The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-18-1994 Planning Packetr planning commission meeting MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1994, 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATFVT: - Charles Kelley ATTENDANCE Aonlicanis presenting proposals before the Commission are asked to mo« to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. SCHEDULED PLT5LIC HEARLNGS 1.7 00 D m #1914 Thomas G. and Phyllis Cohvell/Tim and Beth Traff 1130 Old ^ Crystal Bay Road and 2540 North Shore Drive - Subdivision ot a Lot Line Rearrangement 2. 7:30 p.m. #1921 Mary A. Ulrich. 1000 Loma Linda Avenue - Preliminary Subdivision 3.8:00 p.m. ^1922 Robert and Elizabeth MJamed. 1000 Old Cr>’stal Bay Road South - Preliminary Subdivision 4. 9:00 p.m. Amendment of Section 10.56, Subdivision 3 ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. #792 Minnetonka Power Squadron. 510 Big Island - Conditional Use Penr.it - Public Hearing #1881 John Whitman, 1570 Si.xth Avenue North - Conditional Use PermiL'Variance - Public Hearing b. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. #1912 Tim Hillman. 400 Leaf Street - Variances - Public Hearing #1913 Greg J. Truchinski. 1580 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1915 George Applebaum. 4109 Highwood Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1916 Irwin Jacobs. 1700 Shoreline Drive - CondMonal Use Permit - Public Heanng 11.#1917 Frank and Martha Bennett. 315 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1994, 7:00 P.M. 12. #1918 James K. and Julie Ann Lynch-Daniels. 1225 Orono Oaks Drive - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 13. 14. 15. if\9\9 Ty Bucey, 2677 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1920 Phillip Otto. 4116 Highwood Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1923 Atelier LeSueur. Inc., 2180 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 16. #1924 Don Winter. 4620 North Arm Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Planning Commission Comments 17. Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of April 11 . 1994 18. Other issues for discussion. .Additional Items 19. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the March 21. 1994 meeting. 20. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the May 9. 1994 meeting of the Council. Adjournment Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator April 13, 1994 ^1914 Tim and Beth Traff/Thomas and Phyllis Colwell, 2640 North Shore Drive Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application: Division/combinalion to result in two tax parcels where tour tax parcels currently exist To; From: Date: Subject: List of Exhibits Application Plat Map Property Owners' List Survey Area Calculation A - B - C - D - E - Discussion Annmximatelv 5 vears ago, the Colwells purchased the property at 2640 North Shore Drive .O plat h imo three 2+ acreU. On Lot 1 they built a new residenee m which they^now live. Let 2 contains an existing residence in which the Traff s now 3 is a currLtly vacant 2 acre lot which abuts the shoreline of French Lake and which would n be buildable w^ithout variances to the required 150 ’ septic system and structure setbacks from th OHW. The Colwells currently own Lot 3. Lots 2 and 3 are served by a private rivewa> ou accessing North Shore Drive. The Colwells have acreed to sell the westerly half of Lot 3 and the driveway outlet to the Traffs Zitionally, a3o' strip of Traffs’ Lot 2 will be transferred to the Colwells. The nature of these transfers would leave substandard parcels and therefore the as is always the case in such lot line rearrangements, require that all subsequent parce legally combined for tax purposes by the respective owners. The Traff parcels when combined will total 3.68 acres ol dry land. when combined will total approximately 9 acres of dr>- land and 7 acres of wetland. Tot anerlTpted to determine the future subdividability of the Colwell parcel, however it should be noted that the 150 ’ required setback from the OHW ot French Laxe south basin wou significant limiting factor. Zoning File If 1914 April I3, 1994 Page 2 Both ihe Traff and Colwell residences are currently served with septic systems, although Colwells* current Lot 1 is within the MUSA boundary and has a sewer stub on County Road 84 approximately 900 ’ west of their existing residence. Plat vs. Division/Combination? The subdivision code gives no clear direction whether this lot line rearrangement should be structured as the division/combination proposed or whether it should constinite a replat into two lots It is left to the discretion of the applicants and the advice of their surveyor as well as requirements of the County Surveyor’s Office as to which method will be acceptable. Additional Information The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on existing or future septic systems. The proposed lot line rearrangement includes granting drainage and utility easements 5 either side of the new dividing line between the properties. The proposal does not specify a request to vacate drainage and utility easements along existing property lines. Staff has no knowledge of whether certain of those easements contain existing utilities. Any future application to vacate those easements would require confirmation of their current use. Conceptually, however, the City would have no objection to such a vacation. (It will be noted that the conservation and flowage easement for French Lake wetlands, while shown on the original plat as drainage and utility easements, could not be vacated). The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on setbacks for existing structures The Traff residence will continue to access onto North Shore Drive. The Colwell residence will continue to access onto Old Crystal Bay Road. Staff Recommendation The proposed lot line rearrangement appears to meet all requirements of the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zone. Staff recommends approval under either of the following options to be chosen by the applicants: A. B. Legal combination of all resultant parcels as a simple lot line rearrangement; or Replat into two separate lots. Isv n 7 rJkCITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICAT; PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address_ _ Property Identification Nximber (P.I.D.) __ _ Please check one — Property _ _ abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT i , Phone (heme)- - - -V£ «a.e ] Phene OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- -^ ^ Name Si. i PLlhs Col<^*^_ _ Phone (work)_iV£rLfL5^:^ Address: //%C r/J City. -------Zip: ‘TS 37 / (attach list if more than one/) /(attach list EXISTING LAND USE Nxjmber of Tax Parcels Development Size 3 -£5 Present Use (check)sZl Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all Residential; no. Other (specify)_ parcels of 1 Present Zoning District -♦.•.a Art yj \/ \f • W I'uVrk 11^ I.'! * *• .. '14/'- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per _ _ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential _____ Other (specify) oiTAin iMjiru u‘W • W YOU1 nu: vT/14/^ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a^ separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. Payment of fees (park fees^ filing fee# sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional f^s established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature /Date 7 / Owner's Signature 7 Applicant must have all sunmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. , Mmm OATi iz/tz/n fiX A*‘ BATCH 001’’.■3if* ■■•v.' ij- poop' aoohy JjJOWEH, NAME.W“.TAXPAVEH^♦^.NAME/AOOH*• ■ . V' * ' ’. ‘ • * * / .'!•^r>mP:ADOR 38 09-117-23 13 0004 01150 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO ] 6 N A 0 E STEINHATEL GRE06 N/DENXSE E STEINHAfEL 1150 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S NAYZATA MN 55391<r't 09-117-23 14 0004 130 .. OLO CRYSTAL BAY ROLrr^l^OIOCR NAME '• THQHA9 0 I PHYLLIS 0 COLHELL . ‘V/iTAXPAVER . ^ THOMAS 6 A PHYLLIS 0 COLHELL '^■^jC'^NAME/AOOR |,C/0 COLHELL IHOUSTRIES INC%i YBfB gy55401 NEftlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OItJERS LIST38 09-117-J3 13 0007OlEOO OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD STIMOTHY L TRAFFTIMOTHY L TRAFF1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SHAYZATA m 5539138 09-117-23 41 0003 02545 NORTH SHORE O;^ CAROL 6 CALLAHAN CALLAHAN ;#^;piiop Aooii 00038 NAME a CHARLES ^ ‘ CHARLESTAXPAYER , MAME/AOOR 23 41 0009 ' ADDRESS UNASSIGNED A BXR8XTTA SCHOEN A BXR6XTTA SCHOEN 2430 NORTH SHORE DR 55391 ;,iJ0PMP AMR NAYZATA m 1-':»J,38 ‘ 09-117-23 42 0003 ■' ^ 02425 NORTH SHORE OR QMCR NAME jf . KXRTLANO C NOOOHOUSE ftTAHPAYER ■ .> KXRTLANO C NOOOHOUSE NANE/AMR V 2425 NORTH SHORE OR ET AL ^■N. . t; :: > r* v*> / ‘ “ •* ' mi Af 38 09-117-23 42 0007 , 00038 . ADDRESS PENDING »fCR^ NAME ‘ r ELIZABETH L TRAFF ET AL rAXPAVER'vti^TlHOTHYiTRAFF .» • NAHE/ADDR^120D OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ^;,=1fl7CRYSTAL.MN 55591 ' • i. CAROL 6 BOX 72CRYSTAL BAY rtl 55323 38 09-117-23 42 0001 02455 NORTH SHORE DR C A LXNOELL A J J LXNDELL CRAIG A A JENNIFER J LXNDELL 2455 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA m 55391 . ' . .'•?, 38 09-117-23 42 0004 02485 NORTH SHORE OR J A MITCHELL A P H MITCHELL JAMES A MITCHELL 2685 NORTH SHORE DR S HAYZATA MN 55391 %‘ 38 09-117-23 42 0008 02430 NORTH SHORE OR THOMAS G A PHYLLIS 0 COLICLL THOMAS 6 A PHYLLIS 0 COLHELL C/0 COLHELL INDUSTRIES INC 123 N 3RD ST MPLS m 55401 REPORT NQ. PI435401 PAGE 1 »38 09-117-23 13 000802640 NORTH SHORE OR T L A E L TRAFF TIMOTHY L A BETH TRAFF 2640 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA m 5539138 09-117-23 41 0004 02565 NORTH SHORE DR ' i J A T MARTINEAU ;JEFFREY L A TONI A MARTINEAU 2565 NORTH SHORE OR . ' •NAYZATA m 55391 !V' 38 09-117-23 42 0002 02605 NORTH SHORE OR J 0 JEROME ASK JEROME JOHN 0 A SANDRA K JEROME 2605 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA MN 55391 ■' "X' ' 'i, ■’ i'/ ■' . I. 38 09-117-23 42 0005 02683 NORTH SHORE DR E P NILSON AKA NILSON E P NILSON AKA NILSON 2683 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391* TOTAL BATCH » * X/ •? \ i :■ • v;V & , . ^ * 1 • •• ^• # •.V* . •• . •It f'"'> -;1• •* ! • ' r.f•V;• , ‘‘ • •* x.;r^txt■■'■ '4 : 4■L»-• .^Vrt 'V .£-^ 7• f FAX TBaNSMiTTAr, • lOJG L&KS, MINNKSOTA •i TO; rHOM: DATE; - 7y^ Tve^ A-/^ y^-Aif K • t OF PA.GES IKCU3DIKG TKS COVER PAGE: • • • Hoesag©: _ M/^r^r -tac ^ ^L-£V£ir7^^ J>.rP * • /f js:/a>/k r// <v< 2,oC ' ^ *• •/ 3 • ^ • A <3 J ^c<g‘f \ • ^£4rcor A (M^ 7i^.y(CjC^r f • • •• # • •• • •• • t t • • •! • ••« # • i ■ LZJ - i- l! M. M rw::;^ - _____^J^__ ____2 ‘ S__._/^ A^ \3^_ . X«^. 2^_ (<.55^*>S s___ . OCa Ac. -^f.^<,--------- <i^U/Jt-=-t(.-------------- Lo-5- ;l-z^ 1 I.L, —Ljc^’^ 2. ------------------------./V ^Lt> r- .5 ^S7 /, 7T) “7^ ,S7 -°[,ot ----Uj-fes^ V.s- Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1994 Subject: #1921 Mary Ulrich. 1000 Loma Linda Avenue -Subdivision - Public Hearing Application: Subdivision to create a new 1.52 acre building site leaving existing house on 1.1 acre parcel List of Exhibi Application Plat Map Property Owners' List Preliminary Plat Drawing Sketch - Sewer Locations/Right-of-Way Question Sewer As-Built Topography Overlay Soil Survey Map 1975 Orono Wetlands Map 1989 Air Photo National Wetlands Inventory Map Sewer Assessment Documentation Letter to HennDOT Pertinent Facts Total parcel area (including roads): 3.07 acres Zoning District: LR-IB Lot area: Required = 1.0 acre Lot 1-1.52 acre (1.07 dry, 0.45 wet) Lot 2-1.10 acre (all dry) Lot width: Required = 140' Lot 1 - 166' Lot 2 - 210.5' Propose to dedicate 0.21 acres for Loma Linda Drive and 0.24 acres (possibly slightly more) for North Arm Drive (due to discrepancy between legal description and County right-of-way plats) r Zoning File #1921 April 14, 1994 Page 2 Summary Applicant proposes to split off a new building site from the homestead property. The property is serv'ed by sewer but will require a private well. A wetland exists on the proposed new building site. Because this is a sewered property, area credit for the wetland is allowed. Applicant proposes a view easement over the south end of the new building site, which presumably would force a new house to be constructed on the north half of the new lot. There appears to be adequate envelope meeting setback requirements for construction of a new house. A number of factors and issues affecting* this proposal are discussed below. Road Rights-of-Way Loma Linda Avenue is a loop road with two entrances on North Arm Drive about one- quarter mile apart. The northerly segment has never been platted, hence the 25 'x 376’ proposed dedication is necessary and appropriate. Apparently the County plat maps for County Road 51 show a discrepancy from the applicant's legal description. The County has been requested to address this issue but we have received no word as of this writing. It is possible that the County will ask for an additional 7’ to 14 ’ of right-of-way for some portion along the County road. This will not reduce Lot 1 to below the minimum acreage required. Note that it is likely Hennepin County will request a total of 40' of right-of-way from the center line of County Road 151 as a general policy. The Orono Comprehensive Plan considers County Road 151 a "collector street" with a required right-of-way width of 60-66 ’, which it already has. In a similar plat further south a few years ago called "Loma Valley" the City did not grant the extra 7’ of right-of-way, and to be consistent, the City would not require that extra 7' in this application. Sewer Connections The properly was assessed for two sewer stubs and two sewer units as part of the Forest Lake project in the early 1970's. The only connection fee due for sewer on Lot 1 will be $225.00 per the 1994 Fee Schedule. Two sewer stubs exist, both on North Arm Drive. Please refer to Exhibit E. The existing house is connected to «ewer across the proposed new building lot to the southerly stub. The northerly available stub ends in the wetland. This presents a number of concerns and options. Applicant would need to: Zoning File mi\ April 14, 1994 Pace 3 1 . Grant an easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 for the existing sewer connection, a. up wetland to coLiect'm thf northerly stub. This would require review and approval from a number ot agencies and a variance from the b. Jack < new stub under County Road 151 at a location to avoid digging in the wetland (jacking may be expensive due to other utilities in the rig of-way); QE Move the existing connection to the southeast corner of Lot 2, to the sewer line in Loma Linda.^ It appears that the Loma Linda sewer is deep enough to accomplish this. If this option is chosen, then the southerly stub for the new house on Lot 1. This would avoid an encroachment of the existing home's sewer line across the new vacant lot. Staff recommends that Option 2 be required. Access Existing House Setback With the proposed 25’ dedication for Loma Linda, the existing house will be 33.0 from the front lot line^where a 35' setback is normally required. Due to the angling of the house, only a small portion will encroach the front line. Given that this is an existing situation, it is essentially a Ln-issue. To avoid the technical need for a variance to Iront setback, the Ci y would haw to accent less right-of-way. Staff recommends granting the front setback variance. Other Utility Encroachment? Anolicant should be asked to provide information on any other known utilities serving Lot 2 that exist within Lot 1. and if there are, how they will be dealt with. View' Easement AoDlicant should address the intent and purpose of the view easement proposed and address What specific^^est^tionswouW^ pS exists SJ the City m'unknowingly issue building permits that would violate such an easement. Zoning File #1921 April 14. 1994 Page 4 Grading and Drainage The probable house location on Lot 1 is in mid to lower slope of a hill. The drainage area above that site is less than one-half acre, hence any drainage concerns can easily be dealt with at the time a new’ house is constructed. The standard perimeter drainage and utility easements will be required on the plat drawings. Wetland A wetland exists in the northwest quadrant of the property. A review of the area topographic maps suggests that this is a pothole that would overflow to the north at elevation 987.1* under the 100-year storm conditions. The City ’s topographic mapping and the City ’s wetland boundary as depicted on maps in 1975 do not coincide. Staff recommends that the wetland boundary tor purposes of defining a conservation and flowage easement (which is required) be defined at the 98'^.!’ elevation contour which likely will correspond fairly closely with the actual wetland as it currently exists. As always, a 26 setback would be required from that contour line for any construction, changes in grade, etc. Since no grading, filling or draining of this wetland is proposed (or allowed by the City), it does not require Wetland Conservation Act review by the Watershed District. Park Dedicalion Fee The new Lot 1 will be subject to the standard park dedication requirement. This will be presented to the Park Commission for review. Staff is unaware of any trail needs for this area and anticipates that the park dedication fee of 8% of the pre-development fair market value of Lot 1 will be required to be paid prior to final plat approval. Staff Recommendation The property appears to meet all pertinent code requirements for subdivision to create a new buildable lot. A variance should be granted for the front lot setback of the e.xisting house. Any recommendation for approval should include the following conditions: 1.Prior to preliminary plat review by the Council, applicant's surveyor to stake and define on the preliminary plat drawing the 987.1* contour. 2. Conservation and flowage easement required over wetland. 1 Zoning File #1921 April 14, 1994 Pace 5 3. Grant standard drainage and utility easements along lot lines. 4. $225.00 sewer connection charge due with building permit tor Lot 1 5. To avoid excavation in wetland, existing house sewer connection to be relocated to Loma Linda and new house on Lot 1 to use southerly snib at North Arm Drive. 6. Applicant to indicate whether other utilities or improvements exist in Lot 1 serving the house on Lot 2, and if so. describe how they will be dealt with. 7. Dedication of 25’ of right-of-way for Loma Linda Avenue. 8. Dedication of right-of-way for County Road 151 only of a magnimde to resolve discrepancy. * 9. Prior to Council review of preliminary plat, applicant to provide additional background on intent of view easement proposed. 10. Driveway entrance for Lot 1 to be on Loma Linda at least 100' east of County Road 151. 11. Lot 1 is subject to the standard park dedication requirement. ♦ : To be completed prior to Council preliminary plat review. r OP ORONO - SUBDIVISIONfAPPLICATION — — — — — —— — — —— — — — — —— •# tOPERTY LOCATION ^ ' *S iqU Site Address, l/Ay/fA _____________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 07'//l-Z3 Please check one - Property x abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application. applicant Phone (home)97Zr 7/rs Name Phone (work) Address;A i/e.City;Zip; ssJtry OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name SAm€Phone (work) Address; (attach City:Zip:list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / tiff wr iiiiQiiQ Development Size 2./7 ^ . ‘/S y. ri Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land ilTi LF i Fl!vAhir^ nrrrrr# u*i I A U I 7^:n\>nnnnA A W V* W'V Acres Total, all ni *r;/ Present Use (check)X Residential; no. of uni£l^^*’^^~^“"'"' Other (specify) Present Zoning District Z/ /S ^^Ty6 9 &Ci)0i .’iOi Ti 1: -----------VSr25/ PROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; / Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size; Proposed Use: (check) Units per 2.^2.Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) I* • t : 4 ^ ' MINIMUM MATEBIM. NECESS^Y FOR COHPI^^PR^MIHWI^PM^ION^ 1. Completed ApplicationJjo™^^ Survey. td • Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat ^/^o^ers'’within^ (you must obtair^ rrrfeL^^rSoJily" u1pa°rt.ent o£ Finance A-603 Govt Center 348 — 3271 ) • 4 r>ry nl ^AS6 3 SGPHJTStS lieSti of4. As an addendum to this application, please atw^^ any other persons you wish notified of this appiica Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application complete. Zoning Official's Signature^Date sewer and wa ter asses sment s) • 1. Payment of fees (park fees, fixing^fee^^sewerj 2. 3. sl^^d crrtilrca;r;? Tu^r;;y or mjlar copies of formal plat Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter or creaic5. certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat APPU^tion is complete. Zoning Official's Signature- - - - - -- - - -;_ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & HI) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I 6 II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential)325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00Final Plat Review (Class HI) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 150.00 ;re'7p7ri;;;v'h;;;7y';rr^v"rpV°^^^^^^ requested by the t^process this application and all additional fees established by ordinance. r j i V RUN OATt OS/ZS/n•> BATCH DOS«» ‘ * #■ PROP AODR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER ^ ; NAHE/AOOR •* • • • P- • ' ;-i *' •/ /* * *. •*I a*:; /•. - ‘••■PROP AODR ' (■ . OMNER NAME . . TAXPAYER - NAME/AOOR : 'V ■ * ■. * * *' r' *• * • k ^ prop ador N"«•. .'i TAXPAYER •>.P NAME/AOOR r . .. V : 'PROP AODR -> ,•!<» 'Olt«R NAME i ’. »TAXPAYER NAME/AODR .'■'gv-; .I'lvv. ■ -^ •^A- PROP AODR OMNER NAME 'TAXPAYER V. :V*^ NAME/ADOR -i- ^ • V . I. V,.. A • i • y Vi.. ** J.'PROP AOOR V^i^'OWttR NAME V.:’n^ taxpayer, NAME/AODR • W ^ ✓ 4 • • M '^r* •^ t • ^ • • • '* >-■ .. . VA/-..., • •J F- T* N* >* * 50 07-117-23 11 OOOA 04175 FOREST LAKE DR T A S THEISEN THOMAS J THEISEN 4175 FOREST LK OR MOUND W4 553A4 SB 07-117-23 11 0018 04080 DAHL PO JAMES J STARKMAN A WIFE JAMES A SANDRA STARKMAN 400J DAHL ROAD HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 11 0021 04040 , DAHL RO JOHN L LEPPLA A HIFE JOHN L LEPPLA 4040 DAHL RO MOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0002 04025 DAHL RO L H A P 8 KLOSTERMAN L HENRY A PEGGY B KLOSTERIUN 4025 DAHL RD MOUND MN , 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0006 01029 LOMA LINDA AVE R A R KNOX RALPH 8 KNOX 1029 LOMA LINOA AVE MOUNO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0012 01145 LOMA LINOA AVE JEFFERY 0 JOHNSON ETAL JEFF 0 JOHNSON 1145 LOMA LINOA AV mound m 55364 HEtAJEPIN COIATTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»t«RS LIST38 07-117-23 11 000704155 FOREST LAKE OR FREDERICK J YOUNG FREDERICK J YOUNG 4155 FOREST LAKE DR ORONO m 55364 38 07-117-23 11 0019 04070 DAHL RO M D SCHUMAN AHA SCHUHAN MARK 0 A MARY A SCHUMAN 4070 DAHL RD MOLRO) MN 55364 38 07-117-23 11 0022 04030 DAHL RO JON H NELSON JON M NELSON 4030 DAHL ROAD mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0003 04035 DAHL RO 0 E STEHART A J E STEHART OONALO E A JUDITH E STEHART 4035 OAHL RO hound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0007 01025 LOMA LINOA AVE M E WARNES ETAL H/L EST MYRTICE HARNES 1025 LOMA LINDA hound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0015 01067 LINDEN LA L C A K M KASPRICK L C A K M KASPRICK 1067 LINDEN LA mound HN 55364 V,«. ‘ • * >»!•* • ’••■ t. * REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 538 07-117-23 11 001700996 NORTH ARM DR J M HEIOORN A J L HEIDORN JON M A JANENE L HEIOORN 996 NORTH ARM DR mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 11 0020 04060 DAHL RD J A J NEVE JR JAMES P NEVE JR 4060 DAHL RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0001 04015 OAHL RO R A 8 HAAPALA ROBERT J A BONITA L HAAPAU 4015 DAHL RO MOUNO rf4 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0004 01000 LOMA LINDA AVE MARY A ULRICH MARY ULRICH 1000 LOMA LINOA AVE mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0008 01001 LOMA LINOA AVE GILMAN 6 SORENSON GILMAN 6 SORENSON 1001 LOMA L’NOA AVE MOUND Ft4 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0018 01055 tK)RTH ARM OR R A A OAHL RONALD 0 DAHL 1055 NORTH ARM OR HOUND MN 55364 s*-.. %. V 1>^ ■ •“A *' ^ V V,* t r‘ • V. • ■ ^ I. .*• • •• •\',«*• • • r ■ • • . Lt. '■ •% ' • - '■' ’>.. • • • I.''’ • V .* • • ! ;• ;*• ■V • ••• v'T '.i .-''i • .* , • *. V • '•\4 V**-: *. a ’ *• A ■y , 0 f . * • » j> i \ i \ •9 . -h-A '\ - * * \ t. • * * * • i t- • * 's V »V • • •*; ' ‘ At A-.-' -V ..A*- ■ J ! • ' I ^ * ,RUN DATE 03/2S/94 BATCH 003PROP ADDR ONNER NAIC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 3B 07-117-23 lA 0019 OlOAS NORTH ARH OR SALLY A RHYLICK SALLY A RHYLICK 10A5 NORTH ARH DR mound HN S53AA HE^tttEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY OHNERS LIST58 07-117-23 lA 0020 OlOlS NORTH ARM DR R A L CONRAD RONALD C CONRAD 1015 NORTH ARM OR mound MN 5556A SYSTEM REPORT NO. PIA35A0138 07-117-23 lA 00550103A LOMA LINDA AVE RAJ HEG6 ROGER A HEGG 103A LOMA LINDA AVE mound MN 5536A PAGE »s .^ r'9 ‘yPKOP ADDR y. OMNER NAME • j-: TAXPAYER •, - v. NAME/ADDR SB 07-117-23 lA 0056 01030 LOMA LINDA AVE L A HUINKER A G H NOLLNER LORI A HUINKER GARY H NOLLNER 1030 LOMA LINDA OR mound MN 5536A 38 07-117-23 lA 0057 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HILLIAM R HIBBS WILLIAM R HIBBS 1101 ELFWOOD AVE ORONO MN 5536A 58 07-117-23 lA 0061 OllAO NORTH ARM DR TIMOTHY L BRO timothy L BRO llAO NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 5536A r'..X-• A • t' -f . . ‘■'‘1 t *•» . * M ‘ , 1 V; ,1 • .r^ W ; ♦ •*, « • » \ *• » ^ . A ■ • • • * ^ * . *’ V»- > .4 ‘.v* . .<"•., ■ ^ V-PROP ADDR . . OmER NAME TAXPAYERRvname/ador ' * I'*- J ^ •• • *.*V ' y-r:<y -y ..prop AooR ' OWNER NAME 'TAXPAYER 38 07-117-23 lA 0065 01125 NORTH ARM DR OAVIO J A VALERIE J PETERSEN DAVID J A VALERIE J PETERSEN 1125 NORTH ARM DR mound MN. 5536A >4 ■' t ’’ •» « . if-tt'*‘TAXPAYER .TOTAL BATCH • VA V NAME/AOOR , . . . , p ? ■ -Jtp / fc| . ,7 ;,r; ' . t 1 ■a-'# ' . .' ! • V - '^Vi 9*9 ; <* . / J V / * i ' si •' / -V . ■: -iyy'■: ' *4%Vi • ■ .V. ‘ - ^ • .-i *1 * I A f m' r..*,V • si , ^ , J.. • f M /r* • i, • * *A>; •r*. ••. •'v': 003 00027 38 08-117-23 23 0001 03980 DAHL RD THOMAS P FCGLYNN THOMAS P MCGLYNN 3980 DAHL RD mound MN 5536A 58 08-117-23 23 002A 01038 LOMA LINDA AVE R W SANDLER ETAL R H SANDLER 1038 LOMA LINDA LANE mound MN 55364 CiTV *V t 4 ' ' ! « ^ •■•I,-;’ •.r T-r • . • • •* '• V*' •'* ‘ i * • - iT •. : t • ‘ ri *^ -H* V* < •' •»* < S ■ Y i ^>'•1 A.' * . 9 ■. ■.3^J '6: REPRESENTA??ni!i REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF / ' PROPEJ^T^ATION, TO TH5,BEST ‘1* a* •vr « •. . ; tf *1 I *n DATE^ .,{■ t :.;f I l|^|i S ^ . f.i ' 'jf.x* . s i - 8 ' . . 9 JK i i 1 i .c • • :‘r PRELIMINARY PLAT CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MARY A, ULRICH IN SECTION 7-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA Srrs^fKr Al^tk*« MTt cf tU Soulh...t »arur of th. terlUm OuArttp cf C.cll«„ 7. WMp 117. IUi«. 2J. 4,K,lb.4 „ ,ol- J«l«i>lM « • joljt 0« th. llM of th. H.rth.ut Ourt.p ol ..Id C..tl„, 7 dl.u.t 632.S f*»l north of th* Soulhaut comer of aalcl Hortheest GoArtac of R.hp>til. <>. .w nor^ *1^ th* Uat liM of Morthout GaerUr of said Section • dlsUnc* of DlS^M f**ll U>«^ ^ ^ Soulh*a.t (Wior oMh. Hor hi«l Horth**Jt GurUr of ooctlon 7j thonc* North u th* actual loinl of beglruilnj. .Thl. .hould r..d: Itorth .. .!«« th. b.t Hr. ,1 ..,d E™th...i ^1* ^#y *he-i th* location of an .xlatlrg houa* In relation to the above deecribed troierty. It doea not |Airport to ahou any other lar^oveMnte or encroaclaoata. c, iC k-.. ) MMCr.lt> av leiAVrMn aivnavt lull MMatnaw ComN & Grqnberg. inc. CpMMi/>m\» PiyM/aTs, ^il 5unvyi>f5, Site Pluiincn 4H2 r.im.u.Kk Awnut^■ Lonu Uko. 55356 ^12-473-4141 " O aw dHA.*^ /«/ I tiilili lltjl ihiN hiinm »*4. pi’i'jritl K mr tv unJr* mt Jiml M»|vr» 4ivl iKjI 14m 4 iluit rlXltl.t«^K iitl I ngiiMTt 4iiJ IvniJ ^rtrt.v unJrt II m Um% «4 Ihr Suit- i<l \tini«rt.4j - p^ralf* ________________ M->>! S tviioU M>ntvv44 I m nt«-Niin<l*'i I27AS •A All r*eo IIAll 9-4-9; awMi 9;-339 v»r- « *4 . HO. •-:a. * * ^V;*:•. t9 -I ' ' :r *» r.. . 1 /tcAA\»i 5 •/•! '•^.\* V f*/ ^ . • V f ,'•.•/<•^ 41 ^T\/.(7i)id);;f • *• I •I2“ASH . 91.0./i'i-••••.V2»n • i /stub out of* . * • , J * T* » «I ;•?• » %- .* -lao ., .. ^ .^^6-pOPlJIR ^;;! ‘> V I.• ••; < s_^*. *: • ** * ' ?/ ’ ’ T • /?^rAr,5: V*" ■ } ■■■ '.:-^.’6 ~ — G-i • -? • ••r •. • • ••• ••A94.0 • •! •••• I I I 1 I . . 11 I I ^ • I • ••/•• •. # / I ! I • -—— *y 7 •"'••. pp • !. \ *. o’ I I . - . • .1. ^ ^- * O I 1 ~ L 11 1 I * ^ V-^ — —-i’*—-»-—T------... V- '.- ________—v—-^;r*.-^.-~..*"•-. . ^ .'•••"••..;• ■,•: «.o-.^,..:;:,^ . .■■■ MH 4£l ^ V : . ;• ■ v.v.A- ;,-'': “<>f ^ t’X'v - * **• ••• ' ..' y\ypp *«••«•••••••,* •6 - B.M.j BOLT IN S:**SrDE *®^ OF RR.APPROX.‘3'ABOVE GROUND-988.83 X . rf A8t* • * t 68J0 4 ^79.0 - .*0!.••' • pp o.:» • V U96 ; • 70'LONG ^ I I* ^ t 2»5« 6OLONOI (4800)M.H. 481 ' .“••./ «■ • *• «. • ■* . »v»•• I • . 0^61 V* To* LONG > f • (800) }..v^ ; •**.‘ *.. '• • “•r*Tr?«‘ ' •. • **-^- f • *■ • »»••«• M***««*a ............*••♦•#• »» *, j-» '.- . i • • • g • — A y • o ■ »•< > • %********«•« —........V— . afM •«••,•] *•• '"'**** •• ••M* •*«««•«•. . 1- ^ 5 • ;••».... . f ^ ^ . 4 * • • aa«*»t«»«aa» ♦*•••••f••»••#•♦•«%••• **••*••• a^a • • »*• ^»a«tMa»*a«« •••<♦•♦•••••••'»•« a a aa«aff«aa|a • ^ *••*••«• «••••••*»• at •••• ■ »♦•»•»»«' A*«a ••••aa>M.«.M..M.«—«a^.. .... *•A••«••%••••••*••»a •»••■*■*• ^.... a..330'-R' ♦««M9«^9a»9| • '^l. * a • J . •••~^rA*ar*—»r^:«-»■—♦••••• •.. •* —— «a #^a — »#a »»♦*> » 00 ^ ‘ 0 * •• .••••a*'** *» —. — ay^^a^a ♦» Lay *^ «♦»»»««.... • >»>««»«..^aa.a»a»|.a».Ca»«».. «^«y—.a»«a«»«a»«iaM »a»»««.. .•%«.• "■ •« at»taa<py.JlaaA.. ^ a>M. « aa«*| • a. >* 1^ aa ^ a*..« .. •*.••*• T ■ M>v** ••• •* • '•'» .* ; • ’- V.'***••'•* F* ***“ ^ •*•****•*•'• • • . .Vk a • a < » •a a.. • »a W y « V *<3 **^^ * *^ * *^T** ** * ** IotI.#.^ . \aa. >.M. ••««*•• A....... J. ■«* ■ F, ..aa*. •«*.A •• —«-»?%...... -.#.*•■» . t • .,1 ... a^ • . • a M • • « »«M a t • a«a«'.*4k«»*a . a a #a ••• •••» • ••••»••* »«»^ »«a*4 •a*aaaaaaaaa»a»«#»««ag^»«*a**aaa»a •«••• a«« «•« • a^afaa Mfaaa^aBa^aaaaa • •• •aM»«*«tta*«aa • a« «» • a ^ < » a aa a a aaaMaa»aaa«a*.a#*aa«a«a*a< aaaMMtw.aataa^aa* a«*M *.•«. ■••••Aaa^aa.aaaa a« a^a a**«aa* a a« a« a •0f0^»0^0^ ^‘aaaaa^aaai • •aa*#«a >%a a.f•« • % ' A aa««4a«a • f a*«a«-««*««»4» • aaaa»a«*»a aa^Wa • aaa4%aa«aa.a^-< •*••»• ««^a9«aaa«a« a* aaaaaaA aa» a^ai »4 • • ...."; AT**2.20 ■ ....... ......— t • • • '•. * • — <»f<»aa#44 m ».^aa.#»aa««*« •• >a* «p f a • • a» a a • — • •*»*•»«••♦•••«♦••» a•••«••a..»•««•*»J. aa a*4 a « a a*»«a a a •• • »/aa>« a ^a*««a • « (a* ^ a , 9 ' * • « * * % ■ 4«B»‘ aa»««aY****^|»****A|*^ •«■••• a* *a»t»aa»aa —»Ba|%aa»aa . 4 ’ * • • •« »«* «•• ^ai« •«»»*••••* . J; •#• aa »a a«« a4^4aa«l ♦ .............VV* a♦*•« •••«*••♦44 « #*• .ia« .1... »m.w4..•»••.«..«...>>•.•%. • a4*»4««4 a«^a#a *a B« a a aV a a » • •a«a#%»a a « • •••■•• a^a*»a»B«a«a4> • •*»•••4 a.a*4»»«4a4a%«%»a a*#4«aaaa»aa*«»a«a 4*<«a4«44*< 4 a 44 a« a * • a ^ p*4m • >• a«4* 4«»#4a44 . a|.aa>>4«^«a4* •4a»*a4aaa»aaai G4«4 »a •• 4«4 • a a a•< a*«4« a# aa g 4 4 a IW #• 4 a #• I • * «4 44 •••44a4««#^«*««»*»« 'a^i ••a^^ a* • •• * ••4#a»4«44%^»a««»a4a»« -aaa444*«»»4*a^***4aa - A*a a 4 • Ma aa a a 4 »a • ■ * A a «• • a« «f«i»4 aa«< • a a • *A\ a 0^0 atGaiaWaa • « «/4a.a44 4#a«««a aa»a•4a*««aaa*a*«4# ♦ «*•» • a‘$«a '•«««*thaa..aa444a4aaa9f a 44 a^^aa a«***»4t #a«#a«4«4a^. . •aaaa^.aataaaaa mm0 » a ». * ai«»«#^aa4 • 44aaa*4#4Ba«»**a4a % a««^ a a a a a y* *• « «V • a«* ^^a.%a4^,.«i^»#a,*, «•*♦•••'aa^a • .#^#a.4 44 . *' • # * ft * 4ft>Aa<a4^aa4«««44^ ^ ^ « a 4 W . ** ' 9«M •4a.aat44a4*4#9«f«Aa«»ai4#aa«*< •••••i*'*'^***............•%mm^*^0»mf0,04^4 t ^ • • 4 •' •* »*f • «a4 9 a%^a*i ^4 4 • 4 a 4 •• 49^ •« *4 ' ^ a -r • . 4 # . * ' ' ••• ^4* •♦a 49 4*ft^«f%a a«4a4«a a«»M a4M.*»V s * • •r ^ •*»J* ••»... ..M..|«.4.«.<M.. !•••.». •W*a^444«»«4a4.^^.Va4.t • • ...... ‘44./.a ^a.4 ....?ai ' ^a Baa 4*><^^^a^a4 • . a*%*aa##a44* •aaa^a • *00000t *#»a44..aa.. 4 4 44 44 4 a(a a 4^ 4 •••at * • 00^00fy a|ft*|f4^4*«ft9**»%iowM4 4««a • a • •••••a a4>^A4%** •••^■a •• - i** ••# • A 4«*#a4«8.^44#A4^4a44aa ^4»r^a44f«J . aa a aa a a^a4a 4a44t« W 444«» .«^a aa - a *•• I * ' * • • . * f y 4^ ••■ A aa aaa#. a«»4^ 4^ «4«4 ...........................;..*.;.. F** 'to »4a.#a444 to.# a ••4a4a«aa ^4^a4f4 a k a 44 a a 4a a ##• f ^ 4 a a# • a a 4 •• a • • • a a# a#«4 • a«4 > a^ •«• 44a4aa44*A*a44Aai a I. 44a l*4a a%4 a«4a^»a 5f^ . 4 >.iM •..w*«.. *.. iJ-' • > .a..a.«y... a.. .♦..* f-4l.....|*. ■ • •*. *, ' 4. /, , »• ... ■ -^ ... >( ...faA.M 4*^. .«.4 .•««. . .a.^ . » V * * * i • • » ^ V-' ■ ..^.*»».»«»^».»a» . ^ «.. V »• "4.* <4a V‘ ‘a* ..a^. .*»..•. 4.1 '. •%- .; *■ < .......................................................... ft44*»4 4»44 » ••a aa a«4aa 4«4«aa a a ay«a»#^a ••4a^- aa »^ft»4«a tf i^4^4y a 4 • •••44 to a 4104 a a 44 4 4 a«a 1 a ata 4. « 9^ «# • »4*t.94«#4«a4a 4<* to • « W4^4a taAa • a a . •••a. aa <toPft« * * •••••a f *«4 44 ••a#M' *44 a* ^a»a.a^aa4* BW*44-a»a*«t4^a*4« a* a*4 aa a4 .4^»a. a <4a a *to aka^ ■ 4«a a%*4 a *44 44 to a 49 4^94 a 4 aato 4*1 to •444444«^ a^tol44toft . a«|^taa4 . I . 44 4«4 4*4 <9 ' *A*'*^*B4*to44444»^a4|ta. " • • “ • 4444444 |g 44 4«4 a||4 to»4 44a 9to4 4 a a . • # ' V ‘ f I* ..*• 1-4 a i! * •a.*’ ‘ -r: ••••••• to4^aa • •J -a*. - .* #»t«Ma*— •••a.t^»«„.. t..,,.a. |I- V . VV* * a •<. 4- a9«4>to*-a«4aa'4a4 ••• aa 44 I . ta • - 9«4 4 atto* 4«a44 4 44 a '4444aaa«4a4.a4.44^4*49. ••••a4a444t9«4a4aa4a4«4 ••44atoa44toa44aa4444444 •4444a *4a4a444a. »ato44 > a4444»44*| •*4a.*a4aa.i..»J.».*.......«^M.9 I. .. tL................................ ••to 4ta a9to«^**444 4«444to4 44a*4 a^« am A t I . - tor - . . . . « \w> aat4*.aaaa«a44«toaa .....O'. ^8 ^/c '•••4 9#|4«#4a*4/l^aaa«to4 4 a« * a ^ a «^44 a .# I»44449a4 •4 44.%a a.4*»a44 a#a« .^4 4 aaaaagaa,a«*4444%44«0»••' •44 to#* •■•• a4 44 >4#4aaa44a44aa 444 a 4 •#« .••4a444a44ag.#« aaa to4a4»4to4#9a4^4 4 •••%•a444a *ataaa94<to 4«4a»a4 44toa * t ■ ••toaBa44aa44* «aa44a •#•4»4444*4aa4%*. •••♦••*• *4 44a 4a a .•§••4. to**«t*toto44- • a a a 4to a a a • a« a a • 4A# to a 4 a a# to# 444 ••» * a •■ '•44a4aa4toa4ato**^***#** • t444#a.4a44A« 4 to* a a 44 to«to 4%a aa a* t •••49 4to444«4444 •••••••a44444444441 *••••44 44444 a%#4 4 44•••4a4#444a* •••••••a*#«aa44< •a4aaaa«a«aaaa. a^aaaaa a«*4444 '•a»aaaa«aa«a TviTHsa • ♦ a#44toi9tofto«4toa ••to^4^4 a to 444 44a 44 •4ft 4- a a 444« a-^k*-4a9«4a9«« • •to44to4a a*aa4a| a 4 444 4aaaaa.a4 4a4aa • 4 ^ • ••*to44*aaa44to • •#«««• to 4 a ato •» • «4#a44a»4a•••••■••alAaa a«^ « a 4 a 19-9 ••••• •• •• ••«4a9*aa to a^^« a#a a 444^44 *a • . ■•t*4«<a*««*4a»^«, • 4J.. . to ** * 4to •* . aa^afa •••••#• 44 44 •••••■ »• ) • t**44«^***a*aa9444aaa«4 9^ 4 44 *to4 ato |*44 4to •‘•-4*aa#«#«#a%« 444 aaa4aa9 4#a • *- ■ '■ ' I *.'. # • •ta**.**a»a«. .».«.. a».«.»B.»».»'y» • 444*4a a a # a*a 4 4 a*#a«« •#• ••••a •••^•••4 4a44a4|4a9to9 •••#••. «••••«.,, • 4 4f4a4a4a«»9«^i^9 - to*444a«toa»a9toa. ••••■•••••to4%#^*#4to4» . toaaaaato**#** !•• •••ft *4 444* 44 4494a 4 a»44«a . ••♦toVto44f4 |hi^<ft«4a* « to4«49aA444.#» »4444>^ •••••aBaaaaaaa a^ataii94«4 4«a«« :;:.;::;976.7de::: • 976.58 N ■ aa.a#««Ba«a.#•••••■•••• •■•^a 4 a a*#*## 4 a •4 4 44to44«4I44444a «4 a444a4a4494444*41 • * % • * •44aa4444 44g4a^to«4a4 4a4«4a4a44«449« a44a4>44a aatotoi 4 4 toato a44»4444aato4toa •4 4«4a4«44t44ato4to444ft4li#a4i * ‘ 44 • ^ . ••%#•••• •• to44a4»44 4to« ii i .M .^L« .a.. r.. .^ . :csi *•*• 4 ** • • • ^*a»BB « . y« . . i U . . ^ . .. * V* .* a* . * " • » .^v • '-iBf •».#..B.lg**....., ,«.. ' * *1 *:*rr «to44 4W4»«#*4to^t***to^4 4#«4i«A4Aa4 1 *••#«< _ t. •^*4^ • ^ j # ' •44 A4«»«»4ta*4ato 44t#«l4ft4««44 44444 44 ^0§090i •. ‘-a ••••••**•.'!' % •4 4i«#4##4«4 44#%4ft9^a4 44#to*44to 44#4 9#4 . • 4- . ••• »4 to4f a4ft##4y#4%44i to4t4>a44»«ft4to#>a . -a-*• .».»«•.«. .-a. V..X ol r' *« . ** t' ■■ «. / ;j "-j':- ^ir JSt-A.—% h JI5^[^^P5ESSjIP0 t "\V\\ 'v <i!j ■i^'!V '^V'<«24i* V V- nLfz^\ - w f; 832: "I- ^ ‘ » - 4 c i;®»l sgffPiaagMjimafltf -Vi '<1 • ^i ;ii:| - t\4^j'Sa1S3Ki»:^^ «>* ' V, 'I w-mm ^ /► 'i^ . •" > :• ' ■ • w** » Vv TT-7 7--. *'» -.V -i^V I »-4 ‘-i. , r > > *^» / f ^ ' |T7S ; ■ IBIM \ .. T^ U^U!rLCK<7 &6K}^i ll iiiS '.V 1 j r ' f ' i ^ ^ • • •*-# MM 1 fi^V* • •■ • \i» ■'•I. "7 '» r*s*^ -•.?®»i' 4v yW' m ♦:•.r-..t • /v:-‘'i V ‘tv: ^ •% * /I Jf*' . 'l*l V 4* ^ •' J * ? • • ''Ji N-^-' ■ •/. . •. / ■^ ■,••'* '’• •’>■ > .' r j ‘ *w' *’'( ;w> . -vt ^ 4 • > -> i' * ’<-**- r •^*' r I ' . • . ^i “ V |iMi% Mb^'V i*- > >• • ' • ~d tei. ^ yk'** - uj H- * ^ . if.:*'«w.'1 li at^>^2; ;■-'*. .' - Vf Iv fv • _*<»*• IPS' •• V fm PiCT'A Ji * •> C:>j6'*j ..4 t V • • F --I'-M I \ 22- *, r tSo. ja t-. * T •?> L.II M14i»flt ’'’^*Tlri •'irtiftiillliilllMill ■a , . - « -./v i .L2U^^^ PEMI^ » »i • t T • \.$ *-- » .. «' • *• A’ « 4 ‘ ^■• yV-.T-'r.-*’- % .n 1 - * •i .PEMF loO/ . 't p|gM >_P£WCd •" PWBf: '■4«*. # ••» ^• • » 5 . )6<m .y 4979 • I PU6& • • i ■ L • '. Siiga Itill- V- V\ ’I o /. tjSerrvfK 1 1)'V S' l7 uubh peMc v/..^ -^>.V rv . Oi '-.'I s• • ■• • • • •• * > ^ V >• *i':^s. 9 I «78 ■' »• • *•• • . • • ^ • .% ♦ • ^‘ *- rs/:L • *>r . • .• -fc‘ • ,9 *•“ yr IV2 .....•Ilf;V»1I4 Wt>*1307 1 noo^ 1^0.V *• 00^ ?.^o,rXOOO-'2200^2*!C0^ 2630- 26H0» 265'J- 26B»*^ 26V0^ 2700-^ ii' 641 n 6620^ 41308 4)940 I0001 1 1 2 1 1 X ) 3 0 • • *•. • r •! \!i n -•-f.—ir> •%• I. 1*ft0T •» • ICO. fj jnti. I) 2v*0 I* J.00, n l(Jf‘ o l2*-» 0 3000-1 7?. 5 3303-i 2f)'i . r 0305 X ;i fi*.: n 3307-^1 »*»•. 33.iV*'^X ^fin 0 362 O'2 ' # • 3630"X 50 t» •• '3800 0 65 0 4200-2 l<-'» <• 4710-)1 M M X 2:' 1 0r^ooo^*•( n ^ • 56*4 *.»-1 P.UI* •» »56*;o X •on u 6005^2 •A";. On /lI'M I. •:' • 'I.1If(1 1 • • I. 1« • 1 (I I. 0 1 J 1 1 1 0 I) (» ■l f1 I• • 0 i• * n 1 f- (lAOO--J S" 1)0 .100(1-1 1 '.'1 7 120nn--X 7.'*. «;1 300f 1.•/ V 0 1 1 i-f 5 % 5000-■1 6 1 (>000/'0% <[!'! 0 r- t 7000''1 ? * 5 1 finnn.1 ••*. M 1 9OC0--n 0 • ■ I % • I •• • I *•>!?>•) . 00J 270, (JU au0 on }P.7o'rC0 r'?o,Vfj ''*54*.'. 0?I .»?.70ioo 1270«00 ‘ •270.00 1270,00 AX', i;m .A2VU. 0(1 00 f?70,nn 2ViO.ro i;:yu.oo 0 •?70.0(» 3270.00 .• •.07m7 1270.00 r s4o.00 12'/0.00 3?3.A0,( 0 0 .IV /o,iw.» 1270.0(1 1270.00 1.'?O.0U 1270.00 12/0.00 V VM3.00 .‘2 ■/•.). Of) 1270.00 f} ^ r» ♦ • f # «»• <* •m L'siivn, 00/i9A 'j?•.0/. 00 0 0 ? *'l *i 1.4 V9o/oo yUc)^ 00 I no yco.oo vBa». 00 1012.44 5^*5.50 i:>V2.y6 79'},t0 01.9. f'O 1 :nO.OO ** •• •> P *>.. / . >. r.^ ;.9o. CO 3 Me 00 124-j, 00 MG'jeBO 9.40IDT7ii> T^'oTCu VCO.OO 2/26.«C 63.1.02 3BIV.3?- 390,00 390.00 V09.76 612,30 600.00 603,nn 039.60 693.20 r’y3.3o V1‘..('() Vi '*.(.’0 i Ox Cciu;,:*225.00.00 I 7#^i\0^22 V 000 ?oi; on 225.60 c25.U0 225. 0 225.00 0 00 OU 00 00 00 22.5. 225. 225. 22 s. 225. 0 : (I 0 ft 225.00 f. ‘■■ '•.f f rt •» r» ^r i*. 6 r* b, 225.00 225.00 ' 0 i’9r. CO Q 225.00 22*;. 00 V 225.00 ^ *^^•5,00 **0 .j^V" >•*•5,00 'ViU.OO ir- 225.00 '•25.00 0 % if»CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices PiHtOmctBoi66 Cr^sUl Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 April 5. 1994 Hennepin County Department of Transportation 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 A'lTN: LesWeigelt Re: Subdivision Application #1921 Dear Mr. Weigelt: Enclosed is a plal map and survey for a proposed subdivision of property abutting County Road Commission on April 18, 1994. If you have any questions, please contact me at 473-7357. Michael P. Gaflron Asst. Plaiming & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. TO.KI'HONK - 47>7357 • FAX-473-0510 I To;Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From; Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 13, 19Q4 #1922 Roben and Hlizabeth Melamed, 1000 Old Cr>stal Bay Road South Preliminar>f Subdivision - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. Chapter 11 - Class 11 Subdivision 2. 3. Section 10.28 - RR-IB Zoning Standards Section 10.55. Subdivision 15 (A) (2) - Propeny served by sewer nuy receive credit for wetlands and drainageway area. Review of lot areas: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 1 Lot 2 2.08 acres (exclusive of lake bed) 2.27 acres (exclusive of lake bed) 1.52 acres dry (.15 drainageway, .41 wetlands) 1.89 acres dr>’ (.38 acres wetlands) List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - Application Property Owners ’ List Survey Submitted with Conditional Use Permit for Guest House Wetland/Drainage Areas to be Credited Against Dry Buildable Hardcover Facts - Lot 1 Hardcover Facts - Lot 2 Preliminar>' Plan Review of Application new residentiaf construction, the applicant purchased the single lot and eventually file Zoning File #1922 April 13. 1994 Page 2 conditional use permit application to allow construction of his mother’s residence on the portion of the property defined now as Lot 1. During the review ot the conditional use permit for a guest house, all lot standards were considered. The current dh ision was reviewed at the time of the conditional use permit application confirming that all lot standards were met (review F-.\hibit D). ITie survey also reconfinns that all setbacks conform to required standards. Hardcover facts remain the same as approved in the conditional use permit, review Exhibits F and G. Access to the property shall continue to be provided via the non-exclusive easement granted to Melamed at the time of the City of Orono application. The private driveway owned by the City will continue to serve both Lots 1 and 2. Applicant should be asked to explain signage at entrance of private road. Staff Recommendation To approve the two-lot subdivision of Robert and Elizabeth Melamed as proposed finding all standards of the RR-IB zoning district and Shoreland Regulations of the City have been met, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to grant 5 ’ drainage and utility easements along shared lot line of Lots 1 and 2. 2. Payment of park dedication fee at 8% of the fair market value of the undeveloped land. The value of the undeveloped land shall be determined by City Assessor upon Council’s approval of preliminary plat. r xy'~. jXi Pi CIT>- OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLIC^^N ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _‘ 7^ PnnPT?BTY LOCATION APROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / i —^- - - - -- ■ ., , n^^-^■b\\OOOU> Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -f I U- -- Please check one - Property abstract or- - -torrens? Attach legal descriptj.on__tj3__appl^ i ^Phone zip: Phone (home)_ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ __ OWNER (if different than applicant) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) Name Address: - - --z(attach list ir more t City:Zip: one) existing land use Number of Tax Parcels / *7TV rcLI I » VI___________________ r " TT "iT r^rrlCF i 7» inAAa w'^v'i-w'v'v'v Development Size A/>Acres Acres Acres Dry Land Wet Land CHLVi 01 euM TfI u 300.00 300.00 : ■ rr L V ii* T - TLf A A i A ■ ynii t ittruus I ww Total, all parcels ^299710 £001 ROl 712 :C ,•■.7 /T'e: ,c V'J/ i.\J/ / Present Use (check) ______ 3L- Other (specify).---------------------------- Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:/Existing Units New Units Total Units tA.& Proposed Gross Density: . ^ini ■•ini Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) <Ca:Units per ^ ^ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) sin rtiin L'Itt/ SrTrra u*i. 7nn AA W 7nn M iJVV* vv YC’J 01 T12:C 03/25/9 MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2« Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you must-obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ OcUJuLC- ^ r . fn'>\ . 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a' serrate list of^ any other persons you wish notified of this application.. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. , Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$200.00 300.00Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision) ^^300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Vvf Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Ir , BATCH 005’ *, , • } . : . V* ?. • - :> *>,v■ ■••i/V • •OBno *nnt»' 09-117-25 12 0003okner^!!i: address unassigned"L-G CARPENTER ETAL■^NlSwyfSno G CARPENTERNAME/ApOR ISSOO WAYZATA BLVO tI020'f'1 *HAYZATA.W S5391‘ . . , t . -*1' 1* . Vi;, i ‘ > .•» K - V.: - yi‘’■• ■•■ ■ ' .>-v.,-.'.V: • •'? ••■ ■>- ■ r-. ■ ■• • '. : 38 ’ 09-117-23 14 oftfti : •, PROP AOOR 01100 OLD CRY^TA? n.V' >• OMMPD UAMc n . ^ ULU CRYSTAL BAY RO S: • S wIy ET . . islAMPyAnno ' GUMNIT/FRANCES GRAHAM • .V 1100 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S >WYZATA MN 55391 .. i. ■’ I.! « i\y , • 38,,. 09-117-23 11 0007 # I # , ' • • CITY OF, ORONO of,orono ,335 BROWN RD 'CRYSTAL , BAY MN ' f * . '^6 3^mm V \ V - i - : .I? ©2: .... i *!.• ■*• »■»■'•• -I ■ , . . ■■' ’\ I ■ ';\ ■*.•'•' ’n ’"' '' ■"' v ’"' ' • tf—•'tr~''*' ILM ' ■ • ■ •*^1.' /a. > . *i • ./ ? ^ i - . •• V .V‘W.; ';•«* ,r-., . ‘ * • ;•"■'• ■4-. ■ ••„- :.?, ; ■■ ■•-• •■ . VV'7=> I-'* IM ^ »• 55323 mentjepin ♦ ♦ i COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTFM PROPERTY OWERS Lm38 09-117-23 12 00042c?d« ^ address UNASSIUNED METRO MA3TE CONTROL C0M1 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM 350 METRO SQUARE BLDG ST PAUL MN 5S101 TOTAL BATCH 005 00004 V".report no. PI435401 •• PAGE 9 'I38 09-117-23 13 0006 01020 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO ^5 KENDALL ELLIS •KENDALL ELLIS :y •: * *';[■•X'>TAL BAY RO S , ? .. V/«ir'‘ ‘ ■ r\ '- y ' -Ly' 38 09-117-23 11 0006 vy“‘’vy.'!' 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S --■ - * ^V' 1. ^ , ■ ■'h' *'> *s I; 1212 WAYZATA BLVD - wayzatamn 55391 •. V ‘ * «■ ■ *■ • ‘ 1-V * “i % • . t- • ’ • 1 ' I vV*f . • *kJ\ ■ ••■; V . ., ^ ’•- , -V '■ ’ • ' , . *. • ' ^‘TAV.r’L!v. V . •• • . ■ ■ • . w'; ’■* V> ■ ■ !*•'.•■.■ y. representation OF^IN?S rmATION^AS^t°a JoL^ accurate AND TRUE OF THE HETTNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPFR»”tL®*^^ RECORDS OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF?/ y P«°PE^^AXATIW, T(J THE BEST DATI *• • hmr: 'i . • • s. Vl.*'* V ;• -. ■ » Jf* . ■ ? •• '. .• V- •. , •< ; n' w .1 '4 m iUN DATE UTCM ms 4 t ;4i £• < rcwtj^in om» NtfC TAXPAYm HAK/Amm jk . M Of-117-2S 12 0005 M05A AOOfttSS UNASSIGNIO 'I 6 CAAKHTIA CTAl tEOMAW Q CAA^NTEA IS500 IttYZATA BIVD tIQ20 MAYZATA tt4 S559I - t'T !* ■ AOOfI ONNIR NAHi TAXPAYER NAhE/ADM A S« 09>117-23 0001 01100 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RO S R J GUMNIT A r H CRANAH «»ERr CUmiT/FRANCCS GRANAtt 1100 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S NAYZATA m S5391 JeV. ^1' , ' 38 , 09-117-23 n 0007 . •% * ' 4 CITY OF OROSO CITY OF ORONO 335 BROUN RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 ! rY ’*> \2) ^: vi'4y.; t ’ H: ; ' '• j 4 i COUNTY raORCRTY Ittf^OSUTlON SYSTCH RBORIRTY 0»t«RS LIST SB QY-117-n 12 OOiH BOOM AOORCSS UHASSIGN2D WTM HA3TC CQNTIKX. CONN NCTRO HASTE CONTROL COtOt ISO mrRO S«JARE BLOG ST RAUL TM SSlOl TOTAL BATCH 005 OOOOA RiROiT NO. PIASS401 RAGt M 00-117*21 IS OOOA oioro OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S ACNDALL ELLIS RENOALL ELLIS 1020 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RO & .. HAV2ATA m 555*1 38 09-117-23 11 0006 300 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ■ S'." ROBERT L MELAMED TRUST 18 "rf * ROBERT L MELAMED :>■ 1212 WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 1 t: U :r '>1^ »■ •I •..Ji-ja;, -i; '■*. ■ t i' R- ;*•; uT ■}•/•, ‘;>^V f •C-iV t I I CERTIfY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AM) TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARt/lENT OF PROPER TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF • • K . ? , •y-'"'-.ISTV * T, * 8# .* t 4 ' A ?v • I DAT EPARTMENT EF./ / *r . *1! 'I y t t • I V * • B ^ X. A > 1 ’ •- #i V ' • ’I . ! ■' •< • •^.cf 9}' 4' ’ t'l ;• • T R ;<4 • i*" • A A V‘• >•« 4 • ?•. '• Q CSl> 00 GC 1 1 r- ■> ft, .- (.lii! ju4->i../l-J-4- - J J 4 ___g ______ I V, 1 \. i(j \ --------------------------------- • •'-•■ •■V.^uv\l.|v/,- i'-L._/ /,</f .r I, / / r I i I i, '■ •‘ . * y ^ , / ^s/ / ■; ;?■«: ,■ v/ f-s, / k6 /'J/^ I ' ' /' '' - I / Xt^:; ; 1 J ' - ',..'A'<;t!! -if I ; \ 'fV V, r-r m --------------^ ©1! '•■1 !ii %ii!! i|!S !ii!i |( i1 i.! ItIt Ilii il! !' i I'! l!Mi O M *1 t>«. - -.—n u 52: w Q O0 Ba a Q 5. «o z: 2 - 2 < . ^2 &4 O a 2 o «ot-u bJ 2=ua bau Q lO iffi ?|e t 0 I ‘ _yom^ not H-'" ‘•]_______£':_____________ iik 1I# . . * • H^COVB cH x ULATICN \ f4&r¥is Asf mSLXm rZ.i .■44 “ >• \ ‘ ••r JCOVB CaCuLATICN W}RKSH£ET SE7SACK 2CNC: (CIRCUS cne) 75-250' 250-5G0* 5C0-1CC0 ^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. '-&OSE LENGTH • • • • B. Garage C. DRIVTffAY D.. Sidewalk E. F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , ,PLASTIC SHEETING ‘ V Other rxy ,i* X X X — X ^ X •A X X WIDTH X ‘ Total Haxscovcr in Zqn| Total Property Area in Zone »« 1 • ' . *» 'f. • *. - •*-HJ m m S.P. S.P. S«F. S.P. S.P. A ,t.r. •« . - »'P* yt ------- S.F. S.P. 8t P r 8 tPi S.P. S.P. *• S.P. _ S.F •*F X 100 - -IGuTOO..... O « •> % I • • £Xv // '•* • • • —.’T*. . t t %r ' : •: *^ wt • r r • ••• »• «• • .■ •. \ \ HARDCOVER CALCULATION HCRKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone go^OoO 500-1000' A. ' House S.F. j-ENGTH WIDTH S.F S.F S.F • • - X S.F. B. Garage - X S.F c. D riveway X L ■ • " S.F -.:v D.. Sidewalk ^ . X. . X *. S.F S.F S.F •• ... • E. EATIO/;yr^ -S.F bECK.r'^cT'■ • • * F. Landscape AREAS •••-•. - UNDERLAIN *.—• 'i . • 1' * • • • r - PLASTIC . . . •; , . • _ X_ _ SHEETING V S.F. S.F. SI Fi s.f; V V • t • • • . .•T.-l : 6. Other L • •• X X S.F S.F •• ^•^"SkTotal Hardcover in Zone • **-*^»* ^ • . * Fr t • • < - * V Vv ! • ••t Total Property Area in Zone 3S2£> ■> *•1 X 100 7^\71 'W ■■ • • • • . •*•*.*TV Vrv'* S.F. S.F. I d « • « TvVr; ^ V • • • r /0T HARDCOVER CALCULATION VORKSHEET . Qx ■ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) C0r75^75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone f lU> -1 " A. ' House length WIDTH .« S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. • t GO ®*3 I B. Garage c. Driveway X S.F. « . S.F, . • , S.F. • » S.F. D.. Sidewalk ^X ,S.F. * • « •• •• S.Fi E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS ' UNDERLAIN BY r • , : PLASTIC SHEETING. *• r.'s'- X X X X X .✓ % . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. t • S.F< « . • Other - gg • ' • or ■ - . • • • ■ \ Total Harocover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. *» '£.4 rT XIQO S.F. f.p. I A~ S.F. I b] •** * *i*v ‘ . . • . A* * *,* 4 • r 9t§ •I#*: # * — • !■ -,.•; ■■- ^lov^iy :OVER CALCULATION WORKSHOT.^ SETBACK zone : (c .rcu ohe ) .0-75' Ju ,1-. I ■■ « • Urtiiec •• X —----- •. '^sez S.F. . . > length .WIDTH•• • •• • ■. ^ * • • • %• •»• •• ^ • * •X - * • •s.f; . . • • - :.• • •• X • S.F. •m • . . * • • • # y . • ^ S ■ P • . • * / 'v .1 *. ••• • • •, 4.* ‘ V •• • • • 1 S.'F. '•' • • - / i • • n A O A ^ ? y, • • • y • * • • •• • S.F. * • /• ^«f^/euAV Y • V /5ZO S.F. , X.-.. ■ - ■• .• * • * ■»V • •• ♦ • . • l • . • S.F. . • * • « *. .*• • n C f ntruAt ' f X'Z^o 1 • • . . • S.F. • •• • •• V 4 • S.F. • . • • • • . .. • Y • • •; S.F. E. ?ATioA’^-- D eck - v : ' • •• :. . * • . * * • * • • Y • • ■ • _ 1 . ■• ip z&&^S.F, • .■ 1 j .• ** . • • c. • • ^ « % 1 • ■ . y- ,. . • • - > ' • * . . • 1 AunccAOP **Y ‘ m . •• * .» • S.F. areas • • underlain .. • *• . <**T* ' • * • . * S.F. PLASTIC '; SHEETING • r- ' I '.*. ‘ • ? • • • S.F.• • • * • • ^ \ * -- . • • • V '2 . 0 S.F. c'X ’8 .6c # • .• • * . S.F. • • * • ' I* • tu 7nM« •* » ---- liFf Total Property A ri •< * • . • . nn47^3J 1 kn * • :a jm Zone im 4S7^a •• •4h'16o s.p. [5] X • 0 0• • 100 - • % • • • • • * M«»«* • ( * J . • • .%• *. ■X .V’. ' ■. • .. •• •V 4* •.* • • i o# 1«WORKSHEETWRDcoVEimrcu SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75^ 75-250'^250-500'J 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone Q A. * House ■ .* Zt& • •■•••» • W. •• -V» •k* Total Harocoybr in Zone - ••• . Total Property.Area in Zone A.p. m z^7s^> t.T. m • <• • • • ■• ' <-v'• : • •: •::'r.' LENGTH ; ' WIDTH * . .* • V *t • * • • • • • • • • • •« S.F. • ♦ • ^ • •. •• .•. • "• if •8i • • • • • S.F.. •^ * - • • • • • ‘ • *-p• • • • •• . • Y • •• S.F. ‘ *V‘ ••• • • . m »■ •m ■ • •• S.F. B. • • • ; > *. Garage ■ ' • :"'-Y- •IB • 1 , S«F • C.D riveway ‘ - • ' Y •• • • • / 3B • . • S.F. • •• ^ ■ . Y ■ •• »•#• *• • • • • • S.F. D.. • Sidewalk ' • • S.F. « • • • V • • .* . / * •* • f • • • * •. * 'r V. . ....-................- .Y • • • ■ ........ \• « •, S.F. ►A-. n • ,• * ^ •* • • ‘i•. ■/ '\s, • . ' • . • • •if'-;.;.-v' ' • . . . .,>.. ...-•^ . . •• 9 •• • . • ♦ ♦ • . • S • F t * E. « jATio/^V- DECK.:..hTr j: , .. ;. V./p*• • . -t •; l*r. • . * .V - *•• : 3f • % * * < . • ••>S.F.•w • • »• ' '**« • *• ■• • i- •'Z' ■•■ '. ' *■' • F.Landscape • • • . • -‘i-- Y . ' • • _ * • • i•• * •• S.F. AREAS — • UNDERUIN . . BY • .: « - *• . * -• • • •*•'*'*• • X • * .*• » • • s.f7 • FUSTIC • SHEETING .> • . 4^* *Y • n . • . * / • ;• r t S.F. • •• • . •' ' ■ Y . - • • • • S.F. . ,’r 6. OTHER ' - ' ... .* • f . ■ • • * . •* • * •, • r • ■ Y = • • ••. • «SlF. D • • • ♦. '• f ^ ^ m 4-B Z4-f^0 V 100 - i7.g4- % '■ ^ v - - . • • .X,‘.'*• •• *.• /J TO: FROM: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: April 12. 1994 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendmen. - 'Top of Bluff Definition - Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Proposed Ordinance B - 3/29/94 letter to DNR C - Memo and Exhibits of 3/24/94 This is a public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to Ute definition of 'top of bluff. The current definition is as follows. ■Top of the bluff means the higher point of a 50’ segment with an average slope exceeding 18%. The proposed definition is: more is 18% or less. The reasons and rationale for this letter to Ceil Strauss of the DNR, and ^ determining the point at which bluff Briefly, the definition of "“P protection setbacks are measured. -Hie cumnt detiM a-=1 Ktion "f ^^cts“on the basis that it is guite subjective and not defensible. The proposed definition developed by staff uses 18% slope as the break point between land that is bluff and that which is not a bluff. Staff Recommendation Please review the attached exhibits. Staff recommends approval of the proposed definition amendment. ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORONO ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 3, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF "TOP OF BLUFF" THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Orono Municipal Zoning Code, Section 10.56, Subdivision 3, definition 2 "BlufP is amended as follows: 4m • "Bluff" - A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18% over a distance of 50' or more shall not be considered part of the blufO: A. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. ihe slope rises at least 25’ above the Ordinary High Water Level of the water body; C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25’ or more above the Ordinary High Water Level averages 30% or greater; and D. The slope must drain toward the water body. 2(a). "Toe of the bluff" 'Bluff, toe of the" - The means-the lower point of a 50’ segment with an average slope exceeding 18%. "Top of the bluff" means the higher point of a 50’ segment wi^ on average slope exceeding 1 8%. 2(hl. "Bluff, ton of the" - That point on the cross-section of a bluff below which the slope becomes more than 18% and above which the average slope for a distance_of 50’ or more is 18% or less. SECTION 2. Adoption and Publication Period. This ordinance shall be published in the Pioneer and the Laker newspapers and shall become effective immediately upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this 25th day of April, 1994, by a vote of_ayes and__nays. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorotliy M. Hallin, City Clerk O0\ I* r* March 29, 1994 CITY of ORONO street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Municipal OfTres Mailing Address; P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Ceil Strauss Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Waters 1200 Warner Road Si. Paul, MN 55106 RE; Bluff Definition Dear Ms. Strauss; We have reviewed your alternative version (or "common sense" version) of the toe and tor. of bluff definitions which you forwarded in your Februaiy ’ 18, 1994 letter. While the "common sense " definitions may have their place, we doubt they are defensible in court if a resident was to disagree with the inspector ’s determination. Further, because the "top of blufr is a critical element in determining a line from which to measure a setback, that line must be so defined such that anyone armed with a topographic survey will consistently define the same line as anyone else with the same information. The technical definition for "top of bluff" solves tliese problems, but creates another. While the intent of the code suggested by your common sense definition places "top of the bluff" at the obvious break in slope where a steep drop-off occurs the technical definition for that same situation defines "top of bluff" at a point nearly 50’ back from the obvious break. Adding the required 30’ setback, a structure could be as much as 75-80’ back from the obvious top, clearly not the DNR’s intent (wish, perhaps, but not intent!). The definitions of "toe" and "top" do not necessarily have to use compiementary definitions, since they are defined for two different purposes. "Toe of the biufF is used merely to determine whether a bluff exists. "Top of the bluff" is used solely to determine the point from which setbacks are measured. Clearly, tlie definition of "top of bluff has a greater concern to the homeowner. Addiuonally, the impacts we are concerned about are generally within or just above the bluff, not so much at the base (where the results of protection or non-protection of the bluff eventually manifest themselves'i. lelepl me (612) 473-7357 • FA.\ 473-0510 CeiJ Strauss March 29, 1994 Page 2 Proposed Redefinition^ of "Top nf Rii.ff’ TT.C followmg facts and premises seem critical to us in the discussion of bluffs: Steep slopes" are those exceeding 12%. • DMR a bluff. bluff, aS LTsL\fo°per,TlT% o?mX for 50-“i P"* ^and upper points of a bluff. ^gments that define the lower be conc'erard^toui Ihriifpa'cB rfyet^’steeMo'^7as slopes of 12-18 % which are of somewhat les J cmcer^ "'“P We propose to redefine the "top of bluff" as "th-jr nnint ei, ^^ch the slope becomes more than 18% and above which th ^ of a bluff below 50 or more is 18% or less". This 18®^ "hrf»'iirT% • » i. ^ average slope for a distance of contour topographic maps which me City has resSuy'ava'iStte “sing standard 2’ work by an applicant ’s licensed surveyor wou7d ato Ltcept^^^ '°P°«”Phic survey eXtrfofbSetS - - rDNpVLTnr^ofbifpr^^^^^^^ “ we feel Uutt it meets blutr detenuination, and yields a guamifiable facL7e"ofT"“ fmd it accepm7.“'TOs74°on ^'Tch^ukTfo'rTS >« if you Commission meeting. ^ ^ ^ heanng at the April 18 Planning As always, please contact me at 478-7357 if you have questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoiung Admimstrator MPG/Isv cc: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 24, 1^94 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Bluff Issues - Request to DNR List of Exhibits A - Proposed Letter to DNR B - Five Sketches Defining Bluff Issues C - "Bluff" Sections of Shoreland Ordinance D - DNR Letter 2-18-94 Administering the bluff protection regulations of the Shoreland Ordinance is proving to be challenging. Over the winter, staff took a closer look at the actual language which DNR drafted and which we adopted as they required. We have had numerous discussions with DNR staff in the last two months regarding the intent of their rules as well as applying their definitions to real life situations. In impU*<^» mting the bluff protection regulations as currently written, staff has found that the current definition of "top of bluff" can result in structural setbacks that are much greater than needed for the protection of the bluff. This can have a substantial impact on the buildability of a lot. In response to concerns raised by staff, the DNR has suggested using a "common sense" definition of "top of bluff" vs. the "teclmicar definition currently in the regulations (see sketches 2 and 3). But the "common sense" location often varies with the eye of the beholder, and may not be defensible if an applicant disagrees with the inspector’s determination. The aaached draft letter to DNR addresses the specific issue of defining "top of blufr. Preliminary indications arc that they will accept our revised definition. We think this will allow a consistent and fair determination of the point from which to measure the 30 ’ structural setback from "top of bluff". It is not unreasonable to protect our bluffs, as we learned from the amount of damage caused by the 1987 super-storm. However, one additional potential issue not addressed in the attached letter is how »o deal with additions to existing structures that currently don’t meet bluff protection requirements. Staff is considering how these might be addressed through performance standards rather than the variance procedure, and will advise Council when we formulate something we think might be workable. Unless Council directs otherwise, staff will forward ilie attached letter to DNR and await their response. •THIS. A TBtwFq r /ocjoJ/tlieS) 2S + ^o\✓(i)voiru /s!'Sitfe^ t >3 -rt A, WwT AJS^IT J L acti /Os9 r jDS(^ 0'^^. “ Q ’'S'nrtrf' Cu»^e^“3 2 "Bluff" - A topographic feature such as a hillr more shall not be considered part of the bluff): A. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. The slope rises at least 25' above the Ordinary' High Water Level of the water body; C. Tha crade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25' or more above the Ordinary High Water Level averages 30% or greater; and D.The slope must drain toward the water body. "Toe of the bluff" means the lower point of a 50' segment with an averaae slooe exceeding 18%. "Top of the bluff" means the higher point of a 5”0' segment with an average slope exceeding 18%. 3. "Bluff Impact Zone" - A bluff and land located within 20' from the top of a bluff. r<“'T se -steep Slope" - Lands having average sl°P«f JI;)or ^^ater^i's p^as/red Iver horizontal distances of 50 or that are not bluffs. ^^^rds. The qhoreland Overlay District standaras are Xn addXtofSnto the requirements set forth in Chapter 10 for the various zoning jji3tricts. la case of conflict, the most restrictive provisi applies. C,_ Placement of Structures on Lots. When more than one setbac!capplies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Structures shall be located as follows; 2. Additional structure setbacks. The following additional' structure setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body: Setback from: - Top of bluff Setback (in feet) Jo ■ Bluff Structures-* andimpact zones. ctfssory facilities, except stairways, landings, and locx toxes, not be placed within bluff impact zones. G. Steep Slopes. Any applicant requesting a permit for cc3Ss^ruction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes, shall orovide adequate information to allow the City to t*valuate possible soil erosion impacts and development of visibility from public waters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of pxiblic waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. I. Vegetation Alterations. Lon ✓ wi ■ 2. Intensive vegetatiin clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline and on steep slopesA^lthin the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and trees less than 6 inches in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accomodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced. J. Topographic Alterations/Grading and Filling. 5. The following considerations and conditions must be adhered to during the issuance of construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals: g. Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the City Engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater; h. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones; r N. Agricultural Use Standards. 1. When peraitted in the underlying zoning district, general cultivation farming, grazing, nurseries, , . ^ arifi wild C2TOO harvestixic shall hehojrhi11ux‘er tirucJc famxin^r e-hr--? that no suchallowed in the Shoreland overlay District standards; 2. Animal feedlcts must meet the following a. New feedlots, if permitted, must not be located in the shoreland of watercourses or in bluff impact zones and must meet a minimum setback of 300 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level of all public waters basins; and b. Modifications or expansions to existing feedlots that are located within 300 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level or within a bluff impact zone are allowed if they do not further encroach into the existing Ordinary High Water Level setback or encroach on bluff impact zones. Subd. 17. o n c o n f o rmTTTe^’^is' Noncon^rmrtie^ All legally established I'^tn^aat^o^this ordinance may continue subject to applicable State Statutes and as regulated elsewhere in the Orono Municipal Code. In shoreland areas, the following standards shall also apply: B. Additionr/Expansions to Nonconforming Structures. All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconforming structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements set forth in the Crono Zoning Code. Any deviation from these requirements must be authorized by a variance pursuant to provisions of the zoning chapter. * Subd. 18. Subdivision/Platting Provisions. C. Information Requirements. Sufficient information must be submitted by the applicant for the City to make m ^ A ^ A Ta Xm ^ 2 mm £ ^ mmmm mm 4m 2 A A MV mww w« w—'■— — — — — — — — — — — — j ™ w w w w r ™ —— — a determination of land i'luitability. In addition to information required by other provisions of the Zoning and Platting Codes, the following information shall also be stibmitted: b. A line or contour representing the Ordinary High Water Level, the toe ana che top of bluffs, and the minimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. PHONE NO. STATE OF wi [}^ [1 s ®D epartment of natural RESOUJ ^es metro waters - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST.^;^X., 772-7910 Ml February 18, 1994 FE3 2 3 1S94 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: BLUFF DEFINITION, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Ms. Mabusth: After discussion with Bruce, of your office, we realized harf not incoroorated the alternative version (or common sense ^rsfon^ top of bluff definitions i" its « ordinance. I am enclosing alternative language that the DNR SivisiSr^f waters developed after the field staff »«) complained of problems with administering the original definition. I recommend that this alternative language be added to your list housekeeping and clarification amendments. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist Enclosure AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Top of Bluff" and "Toe of Bluff DEFINITIONS May 15, 1991 The Land Use Coimiittee in its May 15, 1991, meeting discussed and agreed on the following definitions drafted by the shoreland management staff: Top of the Bluff. "Top of the bluff" means the point on a bluff where there iSt es visuelly observedt e clearly Identifiable break in the slopet from steeper to gentler slope above. If no break in the slope is apparent, the top of bluff shall be determined to be the upper end of a 50-foot segment, measured or the ground, with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. 1. 2.Toe of the Bluff. "Toe of the bluff" means the point on a bluff where there is, as visually observed, a clearly identifiable break in the slope, from gentler to steeper slope above. If no break in the slope is apparent, the toe of bluff shall be determined to be the lower end of a 50-foot segment, measured on f*- ground, with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. P o • TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Citv Acimmistrator FROM:Michael P. GafTron. Asst Planning Zoning Administrator DATE:April 12. 1994 SUBJECT: #792 Minnetonka Pou^r Squadron, 510 Big Island - CotKiiiicnal Use Permit Application: Conditional Use Permit for Day Use Recreation Area Note: I his application was initiated by the City in 1983 per the requirements of the then newly adopted RS District Zoning Ordinance. When the City Planner A1 Olson resigned in September 1983, his preliminary work on this application somehow was filed away and forgotten. During Council ’s review of joint use dock license applications this spring, a question w^as raised regarding whether the Power Squadron’s docks arc transient or permanent, and in researching that question staff found that a Day Use Recreation Area CUP had inadvertently never been drafted or issued. List of Exhibits A - APO Letter 5/25/83 B - Srux'k Letter 6/17/83 C - APO U-tter 6/21/83 D - Plat Map E - Property Owners List F - Site Plan G - RLS 1294 H - Memo of 3/21/94 I - letter from Bradley S. Herman 4/7/94 J - 10.31, Subd. 3(C)* K - Photos (Circa 1983) L - 1994 Joint Use Dock License Application M - 4/23/83 Memo Re: Toilet Faciiiiies N - 1001/90 Septic Inspection Reptni Pertinent Code Section: Section 10.31, Subd. 3(C): "Day Use Recreation Areas" are a conditional use within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District (see Exhibit H). Background In 1983, the City adopted Ordinance .No 246, establishing the Seasonal Recreational zoning district to include Big Island. Mahpiyata Island, and Deering Island. Prior to 1983, the islands were zoned LR-lA-1, a Single Family I.akeshore zone requiring 2 acre minimum lot size. Zoning Memo #792 April 12, 1904 Page 2 The new RS Ordinance established each individual existing lot or group of commonly owned lots as "record lots". "Conforming record lots" were those of 5.0 acres or larger “Substandard buiiJablc record lots" were those less than 5 acres with or w ithcHit an existing seasonal dwelling structure regardless of lot size, with those vacant lots of 1/3 acre or less being considered as substandard unbuildable record lots. The RS Zoning Ordinance cstablislKd permitted, conditional and accessory uses, set minimum starclards for septic systems, and set mimmum standards for building construction and fire protection systems. It was the City Cmincirs intent in 1983 to recognize all existing uses on Big Island, and issue lot area variances and CUPs for existing principal dwellings, guest cabins, day use recreation areas, and overnight camps. City Planner A1 Olson created special application forms for the principal dwelling use and guest cabin CUPs, of which there were a significant number, but made no special application for day use recreation areas or overnight camps, of which there were one of each. Rather, be wrote a letter to the Power Squadron requesting specific information in order to draft a CUP resolutitin acknowledging their existing uses. He assigned a file number to the Power Squadron application but never drafted the CUP, and. once he left the City. Application #792 was lost in the shuffle It is staffs intent to complete the CUP review process and issue the CUP per the City’s 1983 intent. Day Use Recreation Area CUP Requirement.s Exhibit J contains the requirements of Section 10.31, Subd. 3(C), the standards for a Day Use Recreation Area conditional use permit. I-unher, that exhibit indicates how the Power Squadron meets each of the requirements: Exceeds minimum 5 acre lot size requirement. Dry huildable area of 7.5 acres (gross area is 9 acres) would allow up to 150 users at one time per ctxle (see discussion below). Lot width of 1,200' greatly exceeds 200' minimum. Annual joint use deck licenses obtained yearly since 1969. Histotically licensed by City for 45 transient slips, equal to 1 per 50 ’ of shoreline. Maintains an established swimming area separate from boating areas. Maintains a vault toilet system which is pumped out as needed. No recent building permits have been requested. A telephone is available at the site as required. Property does abut the lake as required. Property exists in a single tax parcel as required. Zoning Memo #792 Apnl 12. 1994 Pace 3 Additional Information Please review Bradley Hermans* letter regarding the types of activities which generally iKCur at the site. The Power Squadron has a reputation as a "gt^xl neighKir" to the tKwting public, providing a variety of service functions, and has used this site continuviusly since l%9 or earlier The site is capable of hairline a significant number of people on a short tern, basis. There is electricity at the site, and a 142’ deep well provides water for users A 1.200 s f. can*>pied pavilion provides a shaded picnic area, and two storage buildings house property maintenance ^ipment. The pavilion is less than 75* from the shoreline, but is a legal non-conforming structure, with a building permit approved by the Council in 1972. The 12 seaM>naI docks at the site are stored on the grouixls in winter. I here is a permanent dtx:k at the rear of the propeny also used on a transient basis. Area-to-L’ser Ratio The Power Squadron historically has had 250-350 family-unit members, and did so prior to the 1983 ordinance. Their use of the site on a number of iKcasums in any given year exceeds the limit of 20 use^-s per acre we would impose on any new user applying tor a CUP. As many as 200-300 or more persons have successfully used the site at oik* time. A number of factors may suggest that the City should rujl strictly limit the use of the site to 150 persons: • This level of use pre-dates adoption of the RS ordinaiKC. Power Squadron is not a new user. • All adjacent land is owned by Hennepin Parks and is not available for purchase, hence there is no expectation that the site can be expanded to meet the 1983 standard for more than 150 users. 9 Section 5.25 "Shows and Uarge Assemblies" Subd. 7 provides that jpeorporate.d non-profit organizations are exempt from the requirement to obtain a license for a gathering of more than 300 people. • Power Squadron diK*s not want to be in a position of having to obtain ’permission’ to do their normal and customary activities which may include more than 150 users. • Power Squadron has apparently done a good job ot handling large crowds and has not created problems . . StafT Rccomnu ndation The Power Squadron appears to the meet the requirements for a day use recreation area conditional use permit. The City has received no complaints regarding this use ol the property. Zoning Memo #7Q2 April 12, 1W4 Page 4 Planing Commission is requested to consider recommending approval of a Day Vse Recreation Area CUP per the specific conditions of the draft resolution attached. These conditions are open to discussion ch A RESOLUTION GRANTINO A C ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DAY ISE RECREATION AREA PER MIMCIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31. SUBDIMSION 3(C) FILE #792 WHEREAS Miimeionka Power Squadron, a nonprotil Minnesota corp»)ration. (heremaucr -Ih. «' '*« rropeny :.Kated at 510 Big hland, also identified IS RS District Record Lot No. 5. within the City of Orono therettiaftcr City ) and legaily described as: Tract A. Registered Und Survey No. 1294, Hennepin Cixinty. .Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); aixl WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.31, Subd. 3(C) the applicant has submiltcd the requested infomiation for review of a conditional use permit for Day Use Recreation Area with ix'casional overnight camping. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL\Ta> by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #792. The propertv is liKated in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. Orono Zoning Code Section 10.31. Subd. 3(C), adopted by the City Council in 1983. requires that a conditional use permit be obtained for any day use recreation area, and provides minimum stamlards for approval ot such use. Ihe .Minnetonka Power Squadron has operated a day use recreation area with occasional overnight camping at the property continuously since 1969. Pace 1 of 7 ;r o. no ;3. ;a. 4. TTk applicant lus made certain improvements to the propeny since 1P6Q including a picnic pavilion and vault toilet facility (1972) and a private well (1985). Two additional storage structures are located within the property. The picnic pavilion is considered a legal nc»nconfomiing structure since it legally existed at its current location less than 75' from the shoreline prior to adoption of hardcover aiKl 75’ lakcshore requirements. 5. Section 10.31. Subd. 3(C-1) requires minimum of 5.0 acres dry buildablc area for day use recreation area. The gross lot area of the property is appro.ximately 9 acres, of which approximately 7.5 acres is considered dry buildahle. thus meeting the minimum acreage requirement. 6. Section 10.31, Subd. 3(C-l) also requires a minimum "lot area-to-user" ratio of 1 acre per 20 users. Under that standard, die code would allow up to 150 users on the property at one time. All abutting adjacent land is owned by the Hennepin Parks, and there is no adjacent land available for acquisition by the applicant. 7. The Minnetonka Power Squadron by-laws set no limit on the number of members. The average number of members (family units) is 250 to 350. Therefore, the potential exists for the number of users at any given time to exceed 150. Becaus*" the Power Squadron is a nonprofit organization, it is technically exempt from the provisions of Municipal Code Section '’-.25 requiring a license for shows and large assemblies in excess of 300 persons at one time. 8. Lot width at the shoreline exceeds 1,200’, and meets the minimum lot width requirement of 200’. 9. Minnetonka Power Squadron has annually obtained a joint use dock license from the City an«l from the LMCD since 1969. The property contains approximately 2,250’ of shoreline and has historically been licensed for the 45 transient slips this shoreline length would allow at a level of I slip per 50’ of shoreline. 10. The Power Squadron ’s published rules for "Slreater Cove" confine swimming to the beach area, which is designated by buoys. Pace 2 of 7 The propcny contains a vault type toilet system which is pumped out as requirc^^ The history of maintenance of said system indicates thant meets the intent o t sewace treatment provisions of Section 10.31. Subd. 12. A telephone is available at the site. The property exists as a single tax parcel which abuts the lake. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 18. 1994 and recommended approval based on the following findings; A The site containing 7.5 drs buildable acres is large enough to support a dav use recreation area and cKcasional overnight camping use without any adverse effect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands located within the northern pittlion ot the property. B The continued use as a day use recreation area will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties nor on nearby properties. C Based on the historic and expected continuing level of use. the fire protection svstem developed by the Orono staff for Big Island and the Streater Cove guidelines established and published by the Power Squadron for member Jse of the site will provide the necessary precautions to maintain the public safety and welfare. D The historic and continuing use requires no variances to the required standards set forth in Section 10.31, Subd. 3(C). (Alt.: Grant variance to allow uses in excess of 20 users per acre?) E The Minnetonka Power Squadron provides a significant public benefit to the lake bv fostering and encouraging seamanship and sate boating practices. Additionally, the property is occasionally used by educational. research and civic organizations. The Citv Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow day use recreation area w ith cKcasional overnight camping will not be detrimental to the Pace 3 of 7 health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the prop<^>sed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Ccxle and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 16. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommerelations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the communitv. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3(C) to a day use recreation area w ith occasional overnight camping at 510 Big Island (Record Lot 5) for Minnetonka Power Squadron subject to the following conditions: 1 Minnetonka Power Squadron shall be limited to 45 slips at the e.xisting seasonal docks. Applicant shall obtain the required annual joint use dock license from the City and shall meet any multiple dock requirements of the LMCD. All existing dock slips are considered transient rather than permanent mooring slips, but this shall in no way prohibit the occasional overnight docking of boats for overnight camping purposes. Applicant shall provide transportation to the property for annual inspection of the existing sewer facilities and fire protection facilities for compliance for the minimum requirements. Applicant shall provide fire protection for any camp fire rings at the site. Such protection is subject to the special standards developed for island recreation areas by the City of Orono’s Building Department. This protection shall consist of a supply of sand, water, bucket and blanket. Pace 4 of 7 6. Authorities granted by this resolution are granted specifically to the Minnetonka Power Squadron or any of its affiliated organizations. Any transfer ot ownership of the propeny shall result in automatic expiration of this permit and the new owner shall apply for a new conditional use permit it a day use recreation area is proposed. Violaiion of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constimte a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically tetminate any autliority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The urulersigned representative of Minnetonka Power Squadron has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Minnetonka Power Squadron, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the ►.vording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this___day of 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mavor Authorized Representative of Minnetonka Power Squadron Page 5 of 7 STATE OF MiNNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing insmiment was acknowledged betore me on this 1994 bv'"Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor & Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk of the Cily oflirono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City'. Notar>' Public RTTilTO wrauij I CITY I^RQNCy fXrl._£ CITY of OROXO INwa 0(Ti<» Bw* 6i>»0>»U»l Bay. Minnesota 5>.S.VJ.i• Mamcipal OfTiceii On the \orth Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 25, 1983 • / ’ k Minnetonka Power Squadron c/o Dr. Louis Schricker 4829 Minnetonka Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: Big Island property - Record lot #5 Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with information regarding the recent zoning changes on Big Island. Attached is a complete copy of Ordinance #246 as adopted last December 30, 1982. The Power Squadron's non-residential use of this property has existed as an unlisted, non-conforming use under all previous zoning ordinances for the Island. The new "RS" Seasonal zoning now includes special provisions that specifically authorize this type of property use on the islands as a conditional use permit. As discussed at the various meetings, it was the intent of the Council and this ordinance to recognize and authorize your type of property use and to use it as the basis for developing standards to apply to any similar property uses that might occur in the future. Please refer to ordinance section 34.363(c) for specific regula tions now in effect. As with other conditional use permits, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.3595, a formal City Council resolution (perinit) will be adopted and filed in the chain of title of the property to specify the nature and extent of existing use. In order to expedite'this work, would you please take time to respond to the following as appropriate: / 1. Verify the correct tax parcel PID number as shown on the ^ attached blue form (#1). You need do nothing else with this form unless there is an error in the information shown. BUn.DINCifc ZONING - 473 7 357 • \SSI SSINC. administration & ITNANCT: - 473 7358 HI BLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Minnetonka Power Squadron May 25, 1983 page 2 Ik . y !(J » « 2. Is it correct that only active Power Squadron members (and their guests) use the property? 3. chec. the^£ollowin,^Ust^o£ swim^ingrfishing; = ^onal^and IncidenUl^overLghttrails; member meet ngs; occasional and^ melaenra. camping; others? » r*^ ' 4. The annual ^oint use dock license has bee^ year and all recent years. Tnere is au ^ here. 5. swimminq area: what type of safety precautions, equipment and/or supervision is provided? 6. AS discussed during tf.e_d°ck license^review, the jrdi^ does prohibit vault-type privys ' , However, we have been with pump-out maintenance on the islan . s-he ice every tild ?ha? you do have a pump-truck come^out over J_ two or three years. Please the City of all future and please be sure your , the conditional pumping. With this care and continued use of the privy irdefinTieir It ^ertriniris located and built correctly and has been no problem to date. 7 Note that any construction project requires issuance of ap- p«pr?a?e building permits by the City inspector. 8 Is there telephone service available during ^he summer?8. is mere I.I nhone be available for emergency calls,The concern is that a phone d athletic fields and ?^fni^e^ ^orbifts^pIr's^L^^r^rn? - th4 property at times of peak use.# i ^ K 9 What if any first aid supplies, fire extinguishers or slmUaf emLgency equipment is available? c- ■= 10. Finally, «hat is the usagrbeginf^When rui?fofn^:fl^h:jrlrLerS:“^hr^u ^ose is to be able to define-your use in written form for the permit.) thrLlay irge?^Lrth!“in1oimaUon ou^lo'yoJ."*'Sn°behIl£°o£ r 1 CITY of ORON Po*l OfTk* Bo» ^•Crvsul Bay. Minn««eia &53Z3* Offirt^ ^ . 473-7337 On the Aorth Shore of Lcke Minnetonka ORDINANCE NO. 246 RS SEASONAL RECREATIONAL ZONING OFFICIAL RECORD LOT NOTICE FEBRUARY 15, 1983 This notice is provided to the owner/taxpayer of record according to Ordinance #346, Section 34.336. The following Record Lot classification will be considered accurate and final unless you have some reason to dispute the facts used to make the classification. Record Lot identification forms the basis for the granting of automatic lot area variances that "Grandfather" existing properties of less than 5 acres in area. RECORD LOT means all the contiguous or abutting land owned in common by the sar^e person or persons as of November 9, 1981, (the effective date o*^ the island moratorium,* or at any time such common-ownership may occur thereafter, including one or more separately platted lots or unplatted parcels of land, and/or one or more separately identified tax parcels. Because of the unique circumstances and actual use patterns existing on the islands, also included within the definition of a "Record Lot" is commonly-owned land that is contiguous except for being separated only by platted unopened public right-of-way. .Record I.pt ^ ,•'innctcr.xa Power Squadron c/o Dr. Louis Scbricker 4825 Minnetonka Dlvd. .•■linneapolis, 5 3416 This RECORD LOT consists of as follows: t_ _ tax parcel(s) APPROXIMATE SIZE ACRES i CLASSIFICATION: (size IS exclusive of any wetlands) OVER 10 ACRES, (may be SLBDIVlDABLE) '■^^OVER 5 ACRES, but LESS THAN 10 ACRES (conforming but not SUBDlVIDABLE) _ _SUBSTANDARD/EUILDABLE (less than 5 acres? a new seasonal cabin may be built, or an existing seasonal cabin may be improved, added-onto or replaced, subject to setbacks, permits, etc., but without requiring further City Council review) UNBUILDABLE (means a vacant lot of less than 1/2 acre; may be used for recreational purposes without a cabin, but requires a Council approved variance to be built on) EXISTING USE CLASSIFICATION y RECREATIONAL USE ONLY (without a cabin) SEASONAL CABIN, used 180 days or less'year (if your cabin is used more than 180 days/ year, please complete the YELLOW application) Seasonal Cabin plus a PRIVATE GUEST CABIN “S?~Other CONDITIONAL USE y PLEASE VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF THE ABOVE INF0R.MATI0N. If there‘is an error or a change, please mark the correction and return this page to the City in the enclosed pcstage- paid envelope. We want this permanent record to be correct. IF YOU WISH TO CHALLENGE THE RECORD LOT DETERMINATION AND/OR THE CLASSIFICATION OF YOUR PROPERTY, you must file a formal written appeal before July 1,1983 , or the record lot will remain classified as above. Sign below and return along with a separate letter stating the problem and facts supporting any change. Additional information may be requested to verify any challenge such as surveys, utility bills, copies of recorded deeds, etc. 1 IVO lil Offices ^yn . ft Minnetonka ^ Tower Squadron A UNIT or tmc uwirro «t*tcs mwn •qw«o*oh « June 17, 1983 i6, itc Lficaticn. /ariances jerson >r irately :d tax the land it-of-way. arcel (s) c<) lange, ie- Mr. Alan P. Olson City Planner City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 jwzdMI 'lii'iilliiriiK' Re: Big Island Pro^rty • Record Lot #5 Dear Mr. Olson: I am writing on behalf of the Minnetonka Power Squadron in response to your letter of May 25, 1983. For ease of reference I will number my responses to correspond to the numbered paragraphs in that letter: 1. The tax parcel identification is correct. 2. Yes. 3. In addition to the items listed we sometimes have instructional and safety courses for members and guests. 4. No response required. 5. The swimming area is roped off and marked by Coast Guard approved buoys between two docks. While there is no formal life guard in attendance, parents are expected to supervise their child ren when swimming and benches are provided for their use. Boats are not allowed in the swimming area and swimming is not allowed in the docking areas. 6. There seems to be some confusion here. We do not have a sealed vault system. Although the pit has concrete sides, the bottom is not solid and therefore pumping is not required. 7. Noted. Mr, Alan P. Olson - 2 -June 17, 19S3 8. We have telephone service during the summer months (474-31031. In addition, several member boats are equipped with radio-tele phones. 9. Although the island equipment does not include fire extinguishers and first aid supplies, these items are readily available on members’ boats. 10. A typical squadron year includes island activities during the months of April through October. There are no scheduled activities during the other months of the year. Enclosed are copies of our 19S2 and 1983 calendars of events with scheduled island activities highlighted for your reference. Also enclosed is a copy of the 1983 Directory of the Minnetonka Power Squadron. I invite your attention to pages 42, 43 and 44 which pertain directly to our facility on Big Island. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. We believe that the goals and desires of the Minnetonka Power Squadron are completely in agreement with those of the City Council and Planning Commission with respect to the present and future use and enjoyment of Big Isla* h Kobert W. Snook Flag Lieutenant RWStbar Enclosures 2IS mn«tT(J«A WMtl «JU*OW« IM2 OF £<t»TSHAItCHCKtCwtlfft OfflWitU* (H301Instructor Quol1fU«t»o« Cl ass Starts APRIL SstHcWoHprl^^Colftrenc* - lURISOn. Wisconsin NavlRotor Class Starts OporatlORS Tralntnj Class Starts Work Party • Ilf island (0900) Ptibllc Roating Class Citcutivt Co«i1tUt Meeting dSM) Work Party - Hi l»lwO lO’W " *•’'* mting Out Party Work Party - tig Island (0900 - Rain Date) Spring Coreming Board Meeting - Washington, D.C. Slceo Out - Big Island Pancake Breakfast - Big Island (0900) JUKI General Meeting (1930) Wcu Maaker Recognition - Big Island JULt StC€D Out * BIU • *. %Squadron Picnic - Big Island <CM|^n s Day) Pancake Breakfast - Big Island (0900) Executive Ccaaittee Meeting Luau Party - Big Island AUGUST Executive CoBoittee Meeting Rendezvous Party 24.9.B9.B9-1213 13 13 13 13 2 S li 23 23 4 5,4.7 IS 22 7 II 6.7.8,9 13 15 17 17 24 5 7 14 14 14 MliitTQMXA POWER SQWAOROW 1982 CA lEWDAR Of EftRlS,SEPTEWERGeneral Meeting (19M)J’aII!k?‘Uarflsl‘'*Big Island (0900)Fall Governing Board Meeting - San Antonio, TiiMPuklic Boating Class StartsPi1oting/Seaa»n Class Starts Advanced Piloting Class Starts Engine Maintenance Class Starts Instructor Qualification Class Starts OCTOBER Fall Island Party - Big Island Executive Coiwittee Meeting pJ^tJ - Bl! Ul52 (0900 - Rain OaU) Lay Up Party HOVEMBER General Meeting (1930)Oistrict 10 Fall Conference - Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin Dues Moticc Public Boating Class Exwination DECEMBER Executive CoiwitUe Meeting (1930)1 Children's Holiday Party JAMUARY 1982 Rational ^Annual Conference - Hi»l Beach, Florida Annual Meeting and ElectiOD (1930) Dues Deadline Piloting/Seaman Class Starts Advance Piloting Class Starts JN • Class Starts FEBRUARY 1982 Change of Watch Public Boating Class Starts Weather Class Starts Sail Class Starts Marine Electronics Class Starts MIMETOUKA SQUAOffM1963 CALENDAR OF EVINTS7IS.16 12 A 19 18 23 30I 7 7 9 19-22 27-30 29.30 AF»IL 1963 (193U-22UU1District 10 Spr1n9 C»nffr^f«cf - OS^OSH, W1SC0«Slfl Hew nember Orient4ti#« (Tyes4«y Nights)Optritlons Trtinlfig CliSS Starts NorA Fart/ - Straater Covt (0900-1100} iorA Ftrl/ - Streatcr GovtNATCiecullvt CoiiHa1tte« bating (19.10) work Farty - Straatar Coat (talt 4ata) Fittifif Out Party (1630) Fubllc ioatinf Class Eianinatltt Spring Governing Board ^ctinf - Clnclfuiatti. ON Slatp Oyt - Straatar Coat Fancika Iraakfut - Strftter Coat (0900-1100) JUNE General Heeling (see lONklAiiAJTS) National Safe Boating week iq Class Starts New Member Recognition - Streeter Coaa JULY Sleep Out - Streeter Cove Squadron Ficnic - Streeter Cove (Children's Da/; 130Q-1S00) Fancake Breakfast - Streeter Cove (U900-1100) Executive Committee Heeling AUGUST Executive Committee Heating Suraury Fifty - Streeter Cove (see TonkaHAUTS) New Hember Orientation (Honda/ Nights) SEFTEHBER General Heeling (1930-2200) Sleep Out - Big Island Fancake Breakfast - Big Island (0900-1100) Fill Governing Board Heeling - Orlando. FL 12121212121262229 3 9.5 12 15 21 1 11-14 IS 15 15 21 5 13 13 20 miWNlT(?NRA FCNfR SQuAORON 1963-5 CAIENOAR OF EVENTSFwbllc loitlng Class Starts Piloting Clast Starts SemaangMp Class Starts Advanced F11oti»%g Class Starts Engine Halntenance Class Starts I nstree ter Qualification Class StertiOCTOBERExecutive Cemmlttea Heelinginrk Party - Big Island ^ %ttark Party - Big Island (0900 - Rain Dale)NOVEHBER General lifting (1930-2200) District 10 Fall Conference • MUconslB lay Up Fart/ Dues Notice Public Boating Class Eiaminatlen DECEKBER Executive Committee Heeting (1130) JANUARY 1984 Dues Fast Due National Annual Conference - Hlamf Beach. Florida Dues Deadline Seamanship Class Starts Piloting Class Starts Annual Heeting and Election (1930) FEBRUARY Public Boating Class Starts beathtr Class Starts AF Class Starts Sail CliSS Starts HARCH Change of Watch Executive Committee Heeling (1930) CITY i II ORONO Tririphofi# 4TJ-T3S7 ei^t*. c- CITY of ORONO Post Ofnc* Hua 66*C'r>aUl Ba>. Minne^U 5SJ23* Municipal OfTicv^ On the Sorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 21, 1983 Mr. Robert Snook, Flag Lieutenant Minnetonka Power Squadron 5628 Johnson Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 Re: Big Island Property - Record Lot #5 Dear Mr. Snook: Thank you very much for your prompt and complete reply to my May 25, 1983 letter. I will now begin drafting the actual conditional use permit for this property based on your information. As soon as I am able to have this done, I will be sending you a draft for the Power Squadron's review and agreement prior to the time that I ask the City Council to approve it for recordi.ag. Sincerely, / y Alan P. Olson City Planner APO/ams \ (0 #■ iLEiTy: MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON Propeny Owners List 2-28-^ Lisiing :2-II7-23 13 0006 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERV E DISTRICT >.T 1 BOX 296 MAPLE PLAIN MS 55359 22-117-23 14 0003 HENNEPIN COl NTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT r 1 BOX 296 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 22 117 23 13 «»1 TPISTTN O. ERICKSON 45«>7 W 78TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 22-117-23 14 0001 HENNEPIN COUNTY P.ARK RESERVE DISTRICT RT 1 BOX 296 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 22-117-23 42 0002 TRISTIN O. ERICKSON 4567 W 78TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 22 117-23 13 0005 TRISTTN O ERICKSON 4567 W 78TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 22 117-23 14 0002 MTNNETONICA POWER SQUADRON % JEAN S PETERSON 1758 ESSEX RD MINNETONKA MN 553U5 23-117-23 23 002S 1 MARGARET SCHEFTEL PO BOX 176 EXCEl^IOR MN 55331 ’.3-117-23 32 00IH TED R. HANNA 4115 KNOLLWAY DR S MLNNETONKA MN 55305 23-117-23 32 0062 JOHN & CELIA PANOZZO 857 40TH ST CLAYTON WI 50(304 o\( 1r<^f of \v'-r-^ /I ^ Ji' t Iil ! S. Cf^ *. '\ v5l^, Ir 320.U 1294 (*>B-4... 4 P0ci<$ 7 MAi^J r>dcics -v/ $ v^IMMIN.*v ptfCKS 4 POCKS MTKA Pto«;6C. S^OAPIKKJ © T'uitro u^T 22-14-0002. (-ei'V*. I " x\xn PAID Awo mjiZTtn nfro^a ' • DEOSOfi^ I ! .GEORGE a HICKEY;:AUDII0R 98/S^<i i,- ' : : - f i W « v;.4 RECISnaOD IMBj JiURVtTt NO. 19ft 4 (BUIEPiN COUI/n, MINNKSOrii” * / P»a*rs PAV40LE ,„Cr / ON WITHIN OTSCPIOEO PnOPtllTV ARE PAID y C. <P^ iV I * • • ' .*y. f' E»tf tmr c/'.Tnef C .■■iv'.'---'-•.•■'I '* 'A ■jV; of Cev’f Ldf J, : Sor/>OEf 2i. Tf!7f/^ -<» 4§7.9/ 5pj - ‘ * — IF}, LOT 2. OF^tflTCHkL y-f- fff0 7§ fosi^rtv 4r/0nr^<9n or UBDIV. OF.CO\ ' S 6};iN S£C.'2 'ifT//] R23W py LAKE Sottfft uno of Traei C MINNE TONKA •’t V VJo^er ft^vaiion t fi§.4o foo}oko%^t moir, r»^j ^Ii/m^t920 or> /9»/9C9 St'tckmymrk rt 9 tropofej >’00 V£ c«rn#r- cf ra«.*r</,- p^mfUvAO ohi msr Croyk Soy ov/Uf Jam m Flumaora ****^*^ ^ Titles, County of HsnnsplD, tnd of Coestti- - - A . .i. - J n-lncl;*l Hsridlan, lying Southerly of the foUowlng- •t • point cn the faet lino of said Coeemaeat lot 3 distant 180 feet Horth of the Cast quar- 1008,67 feat parallel with the Gaatarly extension of the South line of said Tk-act *51"* PutToees of this description! thanes Borthwestarlr said'Tract ^ C dlatsiat*293'feet Horth "of the Southeast comer of said Tract C! thenea South 5.64 footi.^aaea^OD a baartac of Ueat a distance of 126.5 feet; thence North 66® Vast a dts- tOjite ytft lln« of said lytot C, aLnd thoro •ndiog, 9XC9pt that part of ^-.St-y- "■ “ ’■■■, ^ .:. V Ay ; *"*^D*^qS*‘*'*^ aeeaptad by the VUlage CcuncU of Orono, Minnesota, this ' " VC • • ••?'. r'••1r.• • I- ... . 'O > ■^^TFTT Cordon R. Coffin Land SunrsTor and Flaiinor Long Lako, Kinneaota f r nag. Jfo. 6064 day of ••■'. *e‘ > ■'.r;nfx.v .ay- • • viiv' ; ■ VILLAGE COUMCIL OF OmiO, MUiN&SOr^ :. e By by 1. '., The boaBdariaa «f this rafiaterad land survey hare baan witheactlaally checked and ^mM:%o asMrtala‘that'the legal dsscrlptlcn agrees with said plet. ~ - - - f ‘ *.0; 1969..■■•J.'' , i..-.-.'^:-.-' ;■ V.■•■:;?’)-■ ••'. i SaiUi* 1'laob^* 200 ■ BhU i' 0etohar;r/1969:ro j'I Haaotaa Iron Cated thl* TO By 'UTOQ. mo aa^vraiMiioa ^ of D^C itarBon. OannaDln County 1County Surveyor iMrix^a ahouB ar# aaraad ' f I». ' - K " ■ PILED MM 1 S R70 OORGE B. mexn. Anddor mmmrm comm. Oipiity 961556 OFFICE OP REGISTP.t.n OF TITIXS I Kawn>iN coOT.TT Mririmr.T.i 19 o a 'J^y CtnlfY Thot ihe ., icun .:,n-.!"fcd tjivl p- rv-y No-* ^ 9 4 rj«cf^S,slxarcfT,::T5.C,.,Ti,o;i..n,piT.v.'o-. r ic.1 I.T II,,.; o(i.ce thitiaL*L_day ol .J^fK/noSA. 00*9 vViJTo o'clock.4?./i B|N_K.j4iLLi£GM____ >Jyi3 Rcfiist/J/ oi I iMes .Dcp jty. 1- \c^ REQiTST FOR COl NCIL AC I ION DATE: 3/21/94 ITEM NO.: Adnunistrator Revk^ed:Department Approval: Name Michael P Gaffroc Title A551 Plannuif & Zomnf AJmiaisiralor Item Descrijrtion: Joint Use Dock License - Minnetonkal*ower Squadron Agenda Settiun: Ziwuif List of Exhibits A • Section 10.31, Subds 3(0 and 3(D) Section 10.31, Subd, 16 - 17 - 18 Section 5.42 B - Correspondence 5-25-83/6-17-83/6-21-93 C • 1983 RS District CUP Application (principal dwelling/privatc guest cabin) A question was raised at the March 14th Council meeting regarding whether the Power Squadron’s occasional overnight camping use by numbers changes the status of their dvKks from 'transient (day use only) slips" to "permanent moorage slips". Councilmember Hurr indicated that if this is the case, their application and license should reflect that fact I had not had a charKC to thoroughly research the issue, but after a brief lix>k at the code during the meeting 1 did note that a "day use recreation area" conditional use permit might be required. Having now had a chance to research these issues. I would note the following: 1. In the Joint Use Dock License ordinance (Section 5.42), transient slips are defined as those "on land or w ater used for the temporary storage of many different boats lor short periods of timePermanent slips are defined as lliose "on land or water used tor the storing of a given boat on a long term or yearly basis". The license application requests numbers of "transient (day use only) slips" and "permanent moorage slips". The "day use only" qualitier is a misnomer. Although this wording has appeared on the license application since the I970’s, it is consistent neither with the license code definitions nor with past City pitlicy. A slip used tor occasional overnight camping but which is not for season-long use of an individual specitic boat, is a transient slip by definition. Therefore, the application was filled out correctly. The City has historically charged a $2 annual “slip fee" for permanent slips, no fee for transient slips. Request for Cinincil Action cominued page 2 of 3 March 21, 1994 Joint I'ie Dock License - Miiuietonka Power Squ^ren 3. A review of the code and discussions with the City Attorney yield the conefusion that the Power Squadron is required to obtain a Conditional I’se Permit. Section 5.42, Suhd. 5(B) requires that “any joint use in the RS Awning District by a not-for-profit organization or assocution provKling transient boat slips for stake holders of a property used for dav use recreation or overnight caunping purposes shall he allowed only in conjunction with a valid conditional use permit. . This language was ;iddcd in 1993. Review of RS District, Section 10.31, Suhd. 3(0 “Day Use Recreation Area.s", copy attached, suggests that this is the appropriate fit for the Power Squadron ’s conditional use permit The other possibility, "Overnight Camps", Section 10.31, Subd. 3(D), is clearly intended for organized long-term overnight camps such as the Vets Camp or a scout camp situation. The Day Use Recreation /krea category docs allow "overmght camping , . . only on an occasioml and incidental basis". This appears to be the degree of overnight use historically occurring at the Power Squadron property. The pcrfonnancc standards for this conditional use were likely drafted with the Power Squadron in mind. It was the City’s intent, as nt>ted in the letters referetKed below, to issue ClJP’s to existing users, acknowledging their rights to continue in operation. Additional research discovered the attached May 25, 1983 letter from former City Planner Alan Olson to the Power Squadron regarding their CUP (to be granted at no charge for existing uses), tlwir Juiw 17, 1983 response, and a June 21, 1983 confirmation by Olson that he would "begin drafting the actual conditional use pennit for this property based on your information. As soon as I am able to have this done, I will be sending you a draft for the Power Squadron ’s review and agreement prior to the time that 1 ask the City Council to approve it for recording." These three diKuments comprise the entirety of Zoning File #792, leading me to conclude that before he left the City in October 1983, Olson did not draft such a CUP resolution and this application has iwvcr been followed up. According to additional information in the RS ordinance file, the CUP’S were to be reviewed bv Plannini! Commission and Council under the normal prcKedure. I also reviewed the RS District "nonconforming" use section to determine its applicability to the Power Squadron. It requires that "all existing uses of land or structures which may be made nonconforming by adoption of this section shall be discontinued and or made to be in full compliance w ith all use and peiibmiance standard requirements of this section w ithin a period of seven (7) years from the dale of adoption, not to extend later than January 1, 1990". Note that the Power Squadron ’s use is "nonconforming", because it is an allowed use via a conditional use pennit. The only "nonconformity ” is the lack of a valid conditional use pennit, which the Power Squadron applied for in 1 for CtHinci! Action ci>ntinyci3 page 3 of 3 Lkciw • Miimrtonkj Po»w Smadnai . in 1983 Therefore, issuance of a conditional use permit will licensing ordinance. ^ ,tt^hmrtn\ has been mai’ed to Bradlev Herman (the Po>»cr Stiema. Recommendation 1. 2. 3. T.- I .in. 1 1« Deck Ucen:< ipplication form should be revised to incorporate the of JSim Slip and ^La«n. s1,p. a«l the term 'dav use only e.untmted for clarity. In l..h. of Alan Olson's clear intent lo draft and have Council adcp- a conditional u« Unless Council directs otherwise, staff wUl pnxeed with items 1 and 2 above. BR\»LtV S. HIRMAN ATTcmVt Y AT LA^ IM}? A%mm lao 55«: fcVrt .1 =<• r^x t*i:» v»4-i**« AECEIV1 APR 8 19W CnYOFORONO April 7, 1991 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Adninistrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota VIA PACBIMILl AMD UMITEP BTATgg MAIL 55323 RE: Conditional Use Permit For The Minnetonka Power Squadron Dear Mr. Gaffron: Think you for providing me your memo of March 21, 1994 and the associated documentation. Your cooperation and consideration is certainly appreciated - not only by me, but all members of the Minnetonka Power Squadron Executive Committee. It is my understanding that you are currently drafting a conditional use permit ("CUP") covering the Minnetonka Power Squadron's use of its facilities located on Big Island. It is further ray understanding that you will provide me a copy of the proposed CUP for our review prior to the submission of same to the Planning commission. In order to assist you in drafting the CUP, I would like to provide you with the following supplemental information: 1. While it is true that only active Power Squadron members and their guests normally use the property, there are occasions when we allow other groups and organizations, from both the public and private sectors, the use of our facilities. These organizations have included the Boy Scouts of America, Freshwater Institute, the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol, Aquatennial personnel, an* the University of Minnesota. In most instances, the use of the island is in conjunction with educational, research and civic functions. 2.P«nBitt«<l activities should include instructional safety courses, as veil •• social activities, physical facilities include tvo storage sheds, privies, and the pavilion. and The the hearing froD you at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours. BSH/kjh CBdr. Bob Stiernacc; J ::t. ]I iA XA 1 2 0r A 2 Q0 1 1 cA V Q 5 3 u <L t j l\ i e j 3 51 I ? II ^ 1 3 2 zIzz£ I I0U4Q4 *»T)da)'04i(u<tia)a) ^0aWC«JWC0J3C 0»i5 u ?njc n u **u 3 .. C * NO id ^cn-u OTo5:'Wwnj*Hf-iC 2 U >1^ ^ O aw s* -a tJ" g" S.-2 01 d) 3 «H U n N 0) Of 13 U 4J 3 41 o 3 u W - ^o- Of— 3.-4^»^0)’^» O Wl jj .2 S' 2 .« « o M Jd’w 01 O C 01 0>^»lil !''“«!=, Idu 3 W •• C V) 0) ^ e o OnO.P JH 0) Id "> 2 ** n 2a «-o ^ o a i^'oo" 2 *"-2 iU S "> ""caS u5i5«5uS-o»'-^'-2°*y Ma gaS:jaaSo.5c **1 H U 4J ^ ZZ lu **-i rz J3 ■"*3 mb«“>h . "’’o." " O oi 2 2 - HI ^ ^ *H JC c o» flj Of U dl «.2 Of ^ , wad* D » N w O H ^ u N c •-* a»*^ f g oId Id Id d Oi I ^ »o »o d **5 Of C .r4 W.H 3 W •o Of “ w •o d c O *H •*-1 IM 4» Id H Of >H U u o c OJ 3 a u o m ^ w in Of J3 3 W Of 3 7 3^ >1 J ’5 O u O . w ^ Id ^ Id u O 2S-S- S,o" » *2 *= w 01 7. O Id ■S"gs: Oio ao Of »o J5 d u Of Id 0*13 > 0) H '*-1 4»u o o a o» Ng^ Id 4J « VI ‘H Of Wl 4f VI X 3 Of u Of X) w w Of 44 V) 3 •H X ^ ^ ^^ 'O d Vi ^ w o Id J c -c 9^*^ d* Id o u u o d> o» cd ■U 4J CiQ Id »H *H ^ H > 0 VI d* of*H a Jj d i4 4J <«-l JQ ^ d o ^ 4J 0 3 Id w o 3r4 w Od . df aa 3 W 'J 'or 1 sAI W) VI *4? '4 -V ^ ^ t " i* H 4 if If M ■I »« ia V< o ^ I 11 a> 5 tv' 2 VO I r- c X ?, q J ? ‘^ii s i',., t- e* vt :5 < if d0 t iV w fi ^ Vu 1 I u •-< Id 4J Id Of »u Id o dt w o di M 3 Id u H Of 4J Id O 4J d) o d g 0 Id iH O 5 rH Of T> " E g-ou Of Ul Of #H X3 (dn3 rH •H 3 JQ I Nu 0) d ^ 0 44u U4 Id M 01 M Id 3 44 0 Id >H d •r4 O 0 o 0)• t:in 44 Id Of »-• u o Id Id o o w ro P in 'O 0) Q) Cl Of Of 3 n,-Q O2 0) X .2 2::j" .5 L*’E -c E ^■3 wr o d •H Id 44 d ••4 Id 0 o 44 Wi g tPOf -W H - d *o T) W in 44 *H 3 Of d Id 3 44 IH 3 o oo idOWHo^doo-^ uoodwQfc iduu*H o wj3»h*h*o ofH aa^ Id 'd -^5 o'g 0 J1 'O u ^ q 13 Of Id q XI Id e d H 3o w q d a Of o 3 »H *H Of 44 44 j: x: VI o tp ^ Of Of 3 Of Q^x» jq O 44 > o u nja Qj44 Id 3 O ^ -C O 44 fW.r4 »D ^ Of XI 2*3 §2 u c •H >1c Id V 0 N *7 •vi 4 14. -a i/i I o S Q 3 MC I 3 1 Of d •H H Of V4 Ox:w Of XI 44 44 Id x: 44 ♦o «rl 41 O »H 0 3 0 •H d •rl 0 Of 42 vS c ^3n«» V) % »-i Sku /:\ lit i I 3 0) X)W Vi 0) W 3 O CS Lf iL J Irl *2 ri ^7 tl:r r 1? o ^ T '■ oil K 'I'O 0 « 3 t. 3- !: -i- 1 0 i ri Ti I s.»>«> Vi. J I «-i *4. .q Of 0) 44 u x; *o o Id 44 c Of jQ g idH H O x: ^ w ♦o x» ^ c §* »d H . 2 N Id w X4•H xf o « 5 2-0 q Ofo •»-i f—I »—1 w Id Of 43 0 W w a H Id r-l O H-O q -7. Id o xf ^ Id o •H VI O M4 o P J l/l iu ‘vt o VJ U. U.o a S<2-2 4 4 '4 5 HiO V/l 2 Io I1. ,Ski cc I J t\3 O' o J 'r 4v 7 3 0 1 Q tllo t 3 (Vf . > •Oj Vi ?» & > O- o s C.I. u oO oile ««i < 3 q Id ww Id •H o iJv. 0) q •H H O VI Ox:w •o u Of o M U 44 Id q H 0 Of*H E O >. n. c r4 ‘H 3 X) 3 O Id D*^ 44 Of •H Of 3 N*S W 44 ■‘J 0) tt4 N X) Id -o dJ H ^ r4n0 ^ Id q ^ x: id 5« . g. 0) u ^ fxI? I I TD W Of *H > ^ O i|_| Of ^ XI i ‘ii- 'Af O- vO 3 .1 “5 U' -n w 14 VJ vt)’ hP I Ofx; 4f co iH r-t Id x: qo •M w Id q Of o 14 *H Id 44 Idu u o o O r4 W r4 01 IM U 3 d 44 g- xA 4 i •7 •47> XJ\ O •3.t r 01 ^ 5 ‘Wq O ^ 0) ^ O 3-«.2 x3 0^0 ^ q 44 **^ q*o Of -d 0 3 44 in Id 0) U4 M O 44 W Of 44 S'‘=2“ SI" .in Of 44 ••-I 0 w u Of O O' XJ df x^ Of W.5 VI O w CP VI H 3 O’ Of Vi V..H 'o *2 M 3 B g 3 „ O' Pi O' M Of Of X Of u VI p4 Of VI Id 44 01 Of V|4 o o n Of d rH rH Idx:w w > 3 U I 0) 44 W o S._• o u < O^ XI q^ Sg0) O* H >o Ma o. !2ws°•Hnr d) VI 01 C Of c 5 C 44 O d .H o SH»o •H 01 V4 Of Id Of Id O Of Id N X NV3 d Of 0 O VI Of 04 XI •O »H Of rH 44 (d Id x: Vi w Ida w Of Viw o w »0 *H d > Id 44 U-lo VI Ofa 3 W Of 44 •rl w 1 d O 0) x: 44 in x: 44 •H Ofu q Id 0 VI O 44 qoo q •H U d* nj Id , #H 3 H *H•H g •n ^ O ^d3 rH O 10 rH >H w Of U4 3 0) x: oX) VI 44 3 Of 44 Uf Ud q Of 3 Id C VI f3 3 44 Of w rH W > w rH . O**^ rt* >1 U VI 0^0 O ad w Id • V) lo 01 Of Id x: 44 •H »o Of 'O •H > o VI a Of d iH H Id X2 W N 44 Vi Of <d I I? :> (V CU l NN rH iH 4J 0) O d Of (d V4 > •H -H 'O VIa TJ Of 44 (d Id 0*rAo > •H Of Of rH d d Id • fHrH Of rH »H q flj Id »H x: > rH w Id Of VI rH Of O Of d JCu w Vi iH Id rH Of ! aidx: d 44 Vi Wo o tn 44 5 I v5 \A I 4» 0*3 d*H C H Id Hanj«a« “l?3 .^'«2 r« Of Of aw O 3 a^^Ji ChOf Of x: CP 01 H d x: 44 Id Of u d Id . • rH Of H Of W *2 O _ x: Vi 3 u V) Id On a 0^0 «fiO w O d U S'd "J o e «CDS*® Of w o w U Of Id uu u O'tJ oV4*H o 0 Ofou 44 rH rH O Of rH •H Id'x:w Vio ••4ua qo •H 44 U Of V) 44 Pi Of O X "m '•JS>.4 14 2 VI Of B a D|W O 13 U VIao Ofw 3 •V Ofw Oao 0 Of 2 rH .H Of x: »o 0< Id 44•t 44 Of Vi CO 0 q CP 5 u«vio•H "J Of 044u Id O 44 w q Of q Of .HoOf *H c Id *d•H q Id 0 X3>•H a ^ - ourH0 N Of Of *0 d Id Ofwu q 5 5X3 0 Id •H 1 Xf Of x:IVI c Id qox:a Of iH Of 44 W *0 Of Of >x: o 44 u• a C 0o*^ •o o c Of I -Hc w *« d »o d x: Qj 0 CPr4 O **^ *H If Vi 44 Kyi KW^Sfc^ •' '^2 I • I -, ‘ ■; • t ■. ' "': 'V ■ •'^ • 'i 'v' .r'? ■ i'^‘“;'- :=•''••■ mtM^m <■**?' 'V''*. •» «»»•-. - ' i ■ * 4,., t • - “i j't 1■ '^ v> < ‘ ■ •i^ ■ V:% '■ fs' ra;.: ’ -‘^ V -A”V/,W ''is lf^?p - > V ■~.-;*?22 gt:“ '.V ; - ^ ■, flV'^ ,fjIS:M• > •1-’^ ■'“■ r- . - tAi rtR4*--' yfr ■1 . , r; _____ i\ ms.4. w IS f-v A \i*-: *■ j.. '. * '*- ^ ■ ,. • ■ >. It V^’ **^ m^y-u<m: M ‘ ■■' “if .y .If A. ‘ _i5 « » •• - 1 \’ " 7* C ;i, -iji i ‘t • f j\ r-'- kr- fi mi. m/. ■■ S -iJ » P, ;f fe ; .•( 'I , • Jl. : r i J.I ’'4 •; »4 C '.ll'J V :J IIP.lilii»r M<r • '\v\ ?' - ;| ■;■ Mi.M O'wJV... HT. r CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY. ^CS’ 55313 473-7357 Ui £SSE \Em tCoT € cVW rrrv nc » ( W** W*'W*«6W ^ 'KA^Ct £?t A* ♦ . f 7- VVh'W’^ rcrrrr» AWA» A J A WW ioivt i n<K:K LlCFlsSE AITIJCAJION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5 42 Date Form Scni by City Staff _________Ijeccmber Date Applkation Returned to City-------------------------------- • rrf V A «PW>~^w‘ ft V'V 1 w 1 ^•^W'ft w i ijcr ft w f 4. w -V4. V ft VV fW r wVV 4 ft VV L C~C\ w* T. T * it *Ww f i, |T f WVVA »'VA Tf.X* / .• V • ' T • Fee Received $By Employee Section 5.4:. Subdivision I irFNSF RIQUIREP • It is unlawful fot any (group or association of persons or families, mote than two tn number, whether incotpoirated engage or ponicipate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without lirst havmg obatned a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED /APPLICATION. REQUIRED attach MEaNTS. .AND UCENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY M.ARCH 1 OF THE UCENSE YEAR ANSOCIATION EVFORMAXION 1. Association title or name (if any) /71/AJDE TON Kfi—~~P0tJJ^ ^DfiO P 2. Lake f)] i ------------------------------------—^— Person responsible for this application:3.------------------------------ -- Nome c ^ T^r&rSonnan: COOB K Ut-^b(hn RnA^n . /T)Td^A 4. Relationship to association T7*?£r U Association is (check applicable items): unincorporated homeowner s group, incorporated Homeowner ’s Association, unincorporated club or recreation group. incorporated club or recreation group. Pace 1 of 5 6 Principal purpose of joint use is (check applicable items): ____ provide boat moOTing and lake access for resklential property. ____ provide swimminf access, beach, or offshore dock. )k provide a club or association gatfaring place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item): ____ one member’s private property. casement or outlet owned in common. ____ property leased by the group/association. JL property owned by the group/association List Dock location arul ownership information: Street address 3 lO XsICldA________________ Legal property description B/^ X^ldlfycl R^CjOi'A PI D# N 00 02j____________________ Listed property’ owtkt{s) flT\tt)f]5l'i'Cn^/^A r'Ot] 8. 7 Names of abutting lakcshore property owners (North/West)________________________ (Name -f Address) (South/East) (Name -f Address) Names of other affected property owners: 9. (Name + Addreo , (attach sheet if necessary) Insurance Coverage - The jointly used dock is insured by one of the following: ____ property owner’s homeowner’s policy. X separate group/association owned policy. List the following information: Name of insured f)] / ^ Ofl~Phc0^r (xOi TO GRE Tn^urrik\OP Gre^upName of insurance carrier Name of insurance agency JTt)SULfQif[Q^ ^cjU/SOTS -X/I Policy No. ^300Effective date of coverage j/^O f^3 Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence $ f)CO .OOP Public liability, per occurrence $ SOOfOOQ Page 2 of 5 Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items); fencing ____ security lighting ^ property owner s presence contract security service ____ other (specify)-------------------------------— 11. iCK INFQRMATJ j^M , . . . List Dock Use Area Specifications: ^ ^ Width of shoreline; _________ft- Ungth of main dock from shore: ---------------ft Dock setbacks from side property lines zi shore. -------------- It- aal ----------- 12.Dock Construction (check applicable items). X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) permanent piling with seasonal deck ------- permanent piling and decking wooden decking ____ metal decking 13.List Dock Accessories; Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock Number of life preservers available at the dock nIa ^i li- 14.List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes boat lifts). Transient (day use only) slips 45 _ Transicnl (day use) off-shore buoys Z-O— Permanent moorage slips - O' _ Pemanem moorage off-shore buoys Dry storage (rack) slips -(O' _ Maximum number of boats at the dock 15. List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of Ihe joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. -o-spaces iTRf)«sION AND SEDLMF.NTATION CQNJJIUL Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items). wood seawall metal seawall 16. X stone rip rap concrete seawall grass and vegetation only other (specify) 17. Depth of water at shoreline:ft; at 50 ft. out:at 100 ft. out: Page 3 of 5 REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A.POCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and tl» location, layout and dimensiora of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. liNI^ORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOTTATTOM.^ 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. .A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is pojgguired if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement; 'This IS a renewal applicaion and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in_______(state year) uhI on file with the City." w Applicant’s initials C• INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. members 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are pot required if the applicant initials and certifies the following stalcmeai: •This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws ss onginally made or last amended, in (itate year) and on file with the City.’ A Applicant’s initials D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - .ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule INITIAL APPLICATION FFE RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry <^iack, or buoy _____slips @ 2.00 each TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ $ $ $ 20.00 A?- Page 4 of 5 LATE FEE Renewals Application for renca-al of licenses shall be made no later than March 1 of the license year. The City shall not accent renewal license ipplicaticns received after March 1 unless the arcljcationi is accompanied bv a late fee of S25.00. REVIEW rROCEDlT^E When a complete application is recei\ed. the application will be reviewed by the Cit)- CoutKil and. in the case of new' or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. TIk Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND, OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, tlw applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s employees arKl agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety aral code compliance inspections. Signed 9^ 1 ' W-,«!c 'Jj 4^ ^ 4 < ^ 'V >§CN .-Vj V Page 5 of 5 ISPAir gfjlAlKni^*'’^DwV6o m S«i5Mi ©■«.3RGE -D. HICKEY. AUDIlURHCNNUTM cquiirt, nmn.•^rn FATABLIOH tviTMiH otscmaco Pwo^tnrr a*ji paid^QIED LOO/ aURTTEl HO. ^ Q A mVMEPlM COUI.TX. MUtKESOTA Pi \ • • ••% • I ^ B. }^l^1MER‘5 ^Ul3Di\: >r ii* of^HircHtus v: or / f. < <-*r iC*/**li t o*«A« / >Vrl ’3l ’/ ff*0rrfinr > •/" thmnntl — ^ MKTA POWER SQUADRON STREATER COVE FACILITY iqq^j j-De/unoHL '4 jJ **■ -I ■ I . 1> " iPP^^CAi^ 1" s 100' -sj 7^3 Qocf ' X/f /ai .. f/« •/' l "? !? •• •m • I \• i \ \ \ / / JC ^ -t ' \ .. . VI V,. '. \ • -. i«v7iA*- \ ' Vi'. s :/K'-• • I- 2 rnW y. *ir.<V ;•< II** O •••< 4-;*?>:.w /««Mf \’.S • ••J#iJlf/ R. s m <»« • • A *•*- .r 0(0 mrss'f .. IHM- i/ir***'>* • • • • • • V'"’* i 3 1294 I • » y' ,. f *. } I fc •• • ’•V 1 8 1 i<J • • • • rairiAa^ DitcU • •. ALVER COUNTr HENNEfli (HuntR ic. T Cl *0 1- S ci? • s I IMTEHr.RETATIVE:DRAt«UC OF DIG ISLAND |FACILITY * • • • • * • *• * •Scale !•• - 200’ flU^ , • • • • •• officer5 Conmander Executive Officer Administrative Officer Education Officer Secretary Treasurer Robert K. Stierna, Is 1930 Shoreline Drive feiayzata, MN 55391 (612) 4'?6-1951 Millard Peterson 05 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 (612) 925-3295 Kenneth A. Zullo 3160 North Shore Drive Hayzata, 55391 (612) 471-0021 Carole H. Magnuson 5036 Yvonne Terrace Edina, MN 55436 (612) 926-5109 Linda L. Golle 1845 Watertovm Road Long La)ce, MN 55356 (612) 473-4757 Jean S. Peterson 1758 Essex Road Minnetonlca, MN 55305-1829 (612) 546-3509 (home) (612) 941-9660 (WORK) £>^» . ^ TO: FROM; DATE: SL-BJF.CT: J»4nn«> A. Zoning A<hiinlKtrJtor Michael P. Caffron, S«ptic System Inspector April 23. l‘*83 fiver Squadion toilet facilities. Big Island Today 1 inspected the toilet facilities at the Pcver Squadron facility on Big Island, and wish to nakc the following cowsents: 1. The existing system consists of a concrete vault-type structure located 130 feet horizontally from the nearest lakeshore and with the pit bottom approximately 8 feet above the lake level. It appears to meet all location requirements of the new Island Zoning Ordinance. No water is plta^ed Into the facility. The superstructure consists of a wood framci building with separate Men's and Vomen's sections. 2. Tom Rossini of the Power Squadron stated that he believes the floor of the vault is cracked and some seepage is occurring as would occur in a standard outhouse. He also stated, and other Squadron members present confirtaed, that the tank is pumped out every two or three years is necessary by bringing a truck out over the ice tc pus^ it. Mr. Rossini stated that the vault system was installed some years back to meet State standards for a rest area situation. In my opinion, while the existing system appears to fall into a category somewhere between a ’’permitted outhouse" and a "non-permitted sealed vault", it is adequately meeting the s) ’•it and intent of the law, if not the letter, and doea not appear to constitu health or pollution hazard aa long aa it continues to be maintained as it been in the past. I will reiterate that the intent of the Code in "outlawing" vault outhouses on the island is because maintenance, l.e. pumpouts on a regular basis, is not generally feasible on the island. However, the Power Squadron has apparently been able to provide proper maintenance in the past. Note that septic tank - drainfield systems on the island will also require pumpouts on an occasional basis. I reconaend that the City inspect the facility yearly, and that the Power Squadron be required to notify the City each time the tank is pumped out. As for the requirement that vault outhouses be removed by January 1, 1988 (3A.370, section (b)4 ), the City may want to consider allowing existing vault systems on an individual basis, taking into account the maintenance record and potential of pollution or health hazrds for each specific system and site, before making an across-the-board ruling. 1 ON Site sewage treatment INSPECTION R£K>RT CtT> (>• th< \nrtb ShofT 9f lake ^Imnetsnkj OF ORONO POST OFFICE BOX 6« 1335 S. Browm Rd. CryttM B«y. MN 55323 473 7357 OWNER ^ U- PERMIT NO 'S. City DATES contractors 02 210 t#c1^ (TH«t it BW tyiTiNi □ Mnm m •■cnw Ob C»«v t ppoi»rtM I mmm\ m Krpwwt City •no eopNftiirfiO §f*NM*ny m t^%mm m fre#frwH ty coNttriiCtiON) m 01 0^hp>e^- ta ieo Th# MtTt CwftI »»« in It r rs M r; «• □ 3 lN«t f «*!• Sy NO* PW«ff CMTPWNf CifV tLBrTdOrOli IN m XHn twww. Om* • rwlottMwry Ntfli •• ts f trwe • H0 □ 4 rr --•f cwrwwf C«tV tWOwrOB fm O# tN# CwrfONt iWpMf. 1I%0 •« twQp^gtrwm « CTMiWf • tolwfy N«rorO. Nr ig • It BreewANM. If 0rmmtt00 rwp>icfNtw»M •• VBiir CBUtfcif WHut wtofiN • pwrm«t btfort vopBfly tr«Bt bn O •# pBllMMN tB flirlacv BT yBMBOBffri. BT if CBfnaCt IN# C*ry IWfptClO# IB tfetClMS ByttBfB rtpBir/ •Bil t#Bnwf bn U iMMBlIy bt bw O • Bitifw «n O tit# pi#N rii Ft mn#o. system CONDITIOM ( Ql Oi#cUd PiBfNB wf#y Tjb Ii □ f MNIBBMt NBf R##d#d •! fNlf tun# SoIhSi bcc uPwulBtiBn m tawks iw<lic«f#t tw#v b K bi OO b# ByiBB" •0 BM< mu y#ar to fiBlp pr#M#«^f futwr# 0fObl#mt. □ Sb IiOi accMmolBtiBN m tsnk$ n 0 » critical i#mM T«nki tfiBiOO bt pamp tO bb « •• boon at o<m<bit. □ Syttam it tfia cha ffwfp to toHaoc. TawHt mait bt BMfbai 40 NBart to a liNfiNa tt turf tot Oitcbarft □ Iwtpactiofi ntari wmai Nf taoNt cBaiO wot ba Incaactioii raart 14" Ota. pNial wiaat ba lOtiaflaO m aacb tank at nast pyiBpoat If tanlis Haat wBt baaw pampaO aa^ witnm Oia latt tiaat yaan. tbay □ Inflection p«pt n lacatad thractiy aaar lank baffla. (Doat not •no accarata ynaaa a rtfna nt of taliOB accumulaTion I If tanki N#wt not tiai»n pampaO ewt witfitfi tba latt chraa yaart. tbay BfUMOO ba pampad oaf noty. OrmntmkI intpaciion indicatat □ DrainflaiO It Ory. no turf acinf tvidanf . □ Saata aa lOinca a# turtacino, nat critical ytt O OramliafO ic tataratad and mtibly Oiacnaratnp ontraatad to tha tarfaca. Thu condition r?%ay raou«ra aplaca* mant or addiUBna ta Oramfiaid. Contact tf%a City Intpactor •nwwadiatafy . Rapawy mutt ba compfaM yyithFn 90 dayr □ Dramflald taiant and condition unlinoyyn. SITE CH4RACTERISTICS Limitinf S*tt Eactort □ Siapa □ Soil O H*fh nrater C Lot tiia Q Laka. aiartand, or stream G Draioapt Ratantial for Syitam FaiJura (dapandi on to«i types, •yater tabia artd lyttam conditioni Loyy Madtum □ H»9h O Sf flam If caufinp vitibla MfTfact difcharpa. Sift Capabititiaf for Fyturt Etpanfion n Adaouata C»Fa.r □ Poor G Inadaquata COMMENTS la/^inn Data of Intpaction /Saptic SysTam Inspactor ^ta. ^n that thi* intpaction raport if utad to latiffy tha raquiramantt for a mortpaar* or othar trantfar of proparty. ba advitad that iffapOft doat not puarantaa or cartify that an txittina lytiem «niM continue lo function proparly, but it mareiy an opinion of tha adequacy Of the tytfam under current conditiont bated on the available information Thii report mutt be kept on the premises mih system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY / Inspector-f File GOLD COPY / Homaonmer L To:Chairman SchroeUer and Otuod Plaitfiing C^.'mmiwRMi Members Ron Moorw. Cm Atlmim^rator From:Michael P. Gaffron. Assistaiu Hanning Jt Zoning: AJmini\trau>r Date:April 15. 1994 Subject: #liSl John and !>>nna Whitman, 15T0 SL\th A nthuc .North Ccndiuonal I'se Permit and Variance - Puhitc Hearing Application: Rc^vlc$t for approval of a conditHmal use permit and variance to allow constructioD of a pnvate dnveway crossing of a pnsiected tributary PCrllnenf C«Mie Sections Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20 - Conditional use permit required for filling and grading activities. •y MM .Sccikm 10.55, Subdivisions 8-12 - Prohibits filling in the Hood plain and flood fringe (variance required) and provides standards for review of varunce'Cl'P applications for lame Section 10 56. Subdivisions 10. 12, 13 and 16 (J) - Prohibit grading and filling within 75 ot a protected tributary and provide standards for variance review of such activities. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I J K L Application Plat Map Property Owners' List Survey Topographic Survey Proposed Grading Plan Cross Section City Eneineer’s letter 4/4/94^ «... Coffin and Gronberg lertter 11/1/93 .MCWD Letter 11/1/93 DNR U'tter 1/27/93 Dcclaraiorv Judeemcni Documentation Summary The Whitmans propose to construct a driveway across the tributary creek leading from Holy Name Lake in Medina to Long I^ke. The intent for the creek crossing is to provide access to the rear V/i acres of the property, to allow maintenance of that property (dead tree removal, etc.) and potentially for con.struction of an accessory building at some future date. 1 Zoning Fik #1881 April 15. 19W Page 2 Ceil Strauss has confimwl that ix> DNR DtsUKt X.0 cnsu. n.. ..p.. monies upstream. £xirinent Issue Resolved The OU.I0, .n whkhdn«»av is neiahtHsi. James lawteixe. **” '*n is complcie. applicants pursues! aixi ^rnTu ntiir'iSt u" re^“ appraval. This is Jocumcmcsl m Fsh.hit L. Proposed Grading Plan urn.,.-. E B 1 d..vc».> culvCO Sppm'™.l.l> ISW ^ U.e TheWa.c.hea D,s,r^««^^^^^^^^ Knuineer bhawn GusulM'n p.,^ s;! slopes on the stream crossing be co..structcJ l^atiri" ^™ "’ "*= • ____J ...111 trie' 3l\^pv-. . ------1- The total length of ^ y“d1™r^wS'’”A'^gmfc «•« ""ml wTirri generated from constmetton of the drtveway, al.hsiugh some imponirion of fill may be necessary. Conditions of Approval cons,de:::tora"l"^ construction projects such as that proposed: Mterattons must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the ImaTcsrmount of bare ground is exposed for the shortesr time possible. pf)ssible. Zoning File 11 SSI April 15. 1994 Page 3 • Nfethods to minimize soil crosk)H and to trap sediments hefi>rr they reach any surface water feature must be used. • Altered areas must be subilized to acceptable erosn>n control standards. . Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. • Plans to place fill or excasated materia* m steep slopes must be reviewed by the City Engineer for continued slope subility and must not create tmished slopes ot 30^ or greater. O0% is approximately a 3; I slope). • Fill or excavated material must not be placed in blutf impact zoiks (not a facior here). • Any alterations below the OHW of public waters must be authorized by the DNR (DNR has confirmed no permit required). • Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or coixlitional uses and do not adverse;, affect adjacent or nearby property. It appears that with the revision of slopes to 3:1 at the crossing point, these standards and conditions can be met. Staff would anticipate that in order to construct 3:1 slopes, the crossing may have to shift 5-10 ’ westward to avoid filling into the neighboring property to the east. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance for crossing the creek A sueaested hardship for the variance request is that the rear ot applicants ’ property cannot be suitably maintained and he has little use of that propeny without access to it. Conditions ot approval should include. 1 Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit from the City prior to commencing construction. Construction on the driveway and crossing may not commence until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has issued a permit. 3. 4. Plan must be revised to include 3:1 tmished slo()es rather than 2.1 slopes. Appropriate erosion control and site protection measures (i.e. "Best Management Practices") shall be maintained during all phases of construction. Zi^rung File #1S81 April 15. 1994 Paec 4 ApplK-am .0 execute a DeveUtper x Agt^« ^ aanrf'ai't!l cnering potential co«a of textoratutn shoulJ the proptet he ctattea aiw completed in a timely mai -j; r=r?i.‘":rj;=r ■“ •:?y O? CRCNO" - CiliSaAL U‘X) DS2 APPUCATION M f _ ^ •«i ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------« ??.OPEKTT LCCATIOtl TT" •. J. 'v ^ ~ jj 3it. Address /r^D S^ S^^C, -rcperty Identificaticr. }:ur:ber tP.I.D.) —Z(f ~//g- ^3 3-^ggQg Please attach legal descripticn to acplicaticn if not included cn required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . . . .. (hcr.e)_SOXlJ2^:£- - U B A/. /v/7-;Wghone (work)-------^^^2^------------ ;.,2dress /5^0 6^ /?W aJ_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Ci~ CWNZR (if different than applicant) Phene (hcr.e)- - - - - --- - - - - - Phene _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Name - - -—- - - - C.' nV Zip_ _ _ _ _ _saimm^m.Address - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,- - I (do) (do not) also own tne _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fees “ CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP acplicaticn $125.00 Residential accessory Use e • $175.00 Institutional (church# school, etc.) ” “ ■ ■* ■ '■'$150.00 Guest Heuse/Guest Apartments . ; . _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Ccmmercial/Industrial Use ^ $200.00 Land Alteration ✓' Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ^ ^”^iS|/SL^iil^n^et-a/n“ rwarf; "tSInNs- cd Ia)c.shor. PRD/PIC - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - SIOO.OO (no chanqe frem original applicaticn) W?e.t-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS^ Ccttnercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ----------- $250.00 Vacation ---------- $175.00 Easement Vacation -- - - $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - - - - $300.00 Reconing (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ’ $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100 00 Appeals Other - see fee sch' *.ule PKBSE.T.PSB C. •. ■• ' Present Use of Property - - -^ cttir^lspecify?^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mm 4»* •■* <■» <•» CESCRIPTIOH OP REQUEST A •/ ^ ^ ^ ^ y,tn^» Describe request in detail: ^ - - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Fom. . . owners w’thin 3 50' (you can obtai 1. Certified Property Owners f'^A-603 Governner. this list fren Eennepin County Depar.nent ot Fxnanc^ Center 348-3271). 7«cr ,4-- /Z<<f-ik.r^A La^J. ^ 3. Plat 2Iap. ' - . ' 4. 5. €. 7. any YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIRi OF J*^^?P$$E?^fw?^rED A WOWCING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER^ fOR^^ DOCUM^^ _____ The applicant and Property must sign this applicatlo^ .enember that your application is not complete i. the a.ove in.o. not been included. ______________________________________________ cirtnicltlorbrclerlcar^e^lrlnenrt Land Us. Applioaticn is ccnplete. initials of Clerical Staff:.________ __________________________________________—— SIGNA^ ^ inforr.aticn renulred or is true and correct to the best,_rd5 his/her k.-owledge. . . Date 9/-:^a/93Applicant's signature^...-^ — OWNERS SIGNATURE Owner's signature Date Ap;iIcan7mus7hI7e ‘7lTVufct.ittals into the City °"tt1nos^t7 he\“d the Monday of each month. Anplicants must be present at alx ?s review meetings -f Ihe Planning Conoaission and Co.^cil. If »" review ^ a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have a ^fhorited agen\ atte^^^^^ pl^ce^nd advise the Building S lonxng Office of t.his c.hange prior to the meeting. P'1-11?'33-(R Pfc-IIS-3.3- V I QK rm oATi w tSftCMN COIKTY PMVfRTY l»#0««*ni» StSTlH MORCtTt Oicn LISTBATOI 003omEt mmTAXPAYER f NAK/AOOa 'i* oiop Aom rRMER NAME rA)»Ayi« MATS/AWW i OHNER NAME TAXRAYCR HAHC/AOOIt '4i I * ■raop AODH ONNCII NAHt k ! TAXPAYER ^ Sf> NAMi/ADOII ^ *« 1 . ■ RROO AOOR ;V o»#€R Mtm '^TAXPAYER f I • • >w * . V-^’!.kw VI' .«r'~VX:k # .A•rik:?' ' SO E«-n«-Z3 5E iOR3 • 1S7S SIXTH AVf N JOHN E MNITWAM JOHN E MRITHAN 1570 ATM AVE M LONG LARI HN 553SA 30 ZA-nO-ZS sz 0X5A6 SIXTH AVE H H I LARSCN ASS LARSON R LARSON ASS LARSON ISAO SIXTM AVE M LONS lARE tot 5S5SA 30 ZA-11I.Z3 3Z 0007 01550 SIXTH AVE N JANES r LAMRCNCE t MITf JAMES f UMRENCE 1550 ATM AVE M LOHO LARI MN 55J5A 50 ZA-110-Z3 SZ 0000 oiAao TtmcuNono ro R 6 MALISER A S E ttAL&ER RCKRT 6 A SALLY I MAUSER IRM TANQLEMOOe RO S LONB LARE m 5555A 30 ZA-110-Z3 5Z 001Z 01550 SIXTH AVE N JAMES A ARLA LANRENCE JAMES A ARLA LAMRENCE ISSO ATH AVE N LONB LARE HN 5535A SO ZA-llO-ZI 33 OOZA eiAOS SIXTH AVE H HILLIM R A SAROARA A RCARCE HILLIAH A SAMARA REARCE RO SOM A300 MRLS W4 55AA0 SS Z«-118-n S3 0033 00030 AOORESS UNASSlGt«fi> JANE 0 LEVERING JANE D LEVERING lAOS OLIVE LA OZIZ RLYMOUTM tOt 55AA7 SO Z7-11S-Z3 A1 OOOA 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNCO stAii or MitoesoTA .STATE or MINNESOTA NAHC/AOOR 00 Z7-110-Z3 lA OOOZ 00080 AOORESS UNASSIGtCO DERT Of NATURAL RESOURCES OERT or NATURAL RCSvXIRCES IZOO NARNCR RO ST RAUL MN 5510A TOTU BATCH 003 00013 % lilRORT NO. RlASSAOl RAGE 738 ZA-118-Z5 3Z015A0 SIXTH AVE N ALBERT H NMITNAN I MITE ALBERT i MHITHAH 15A0 ATM AVI N LONG LARI tot 5535830 ZA-llO'ZS SZ OOlZ 015AO TIMGIEMDOO RO J T AND R 0 DOUGLAS JOHN T DOUGLAS 15A0 TANCLEMOOO RO long LARE m S53SA 58 ZA-118-Z3 31 08SZ OIAOO LONG LAKE OlVB ROBERT A BtNTE MARE ROOERT A SENTE HARE lAOO LONG LAKE BIVO LONG LAKE m 5SS5A 00 ZA-118-Z3 ZS 0001 00080 AOORESS UMASSICNEO DERT or NATURAL RESOURCES OERT or NATURAL RESOURCES IZOO HARt«R RO ST RAUL MltRI 5510A 1' 4 ( rH '.<.5-40!I ) i ■ V. \. * ♦ tl, • • : t 'f 1 1570 Sixth Avonuo North CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN E. WHITMAN IN TRACT A. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY h 1418 r^HUPOSED DRIVEWAY FOR *«<* •> <%• »•. «• JHIil TRACT E. WHITMAN R.L.S. NO. 1418 m Bonestroo Rosene Anderfik & \j^ Associates Er>9 *nee fi A Afchitecti April 4. 1994 i» m •• • ir - ^ f ^ •n ^ma *•f •f • « •t •f M • .. • : •! ff • • C ^ I •f • Ml *1 « M *• A *« p . ^ «fe« #1 •f ■j»(( *4 r • •f •f « •« P* »f •f •f •f in s>iar» iP«i« Ms, Jeanne A MabuM** Building and Zoning Adniinisiratoi City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crxstal Bav. MinncsoU 55323 Re: ^Tiitinan Sueam Crossing FUe No. 139-I s'81 Dear Jeanne, We have revie^^ed the proposed driveway plan prepared foi John Whitman by Coffin Gronberg, Inc. The property is Uvated north of CSAH No 6 in the southwest corner s>f Section 26 The dnvewav construction in\olves the installation of a cuKert crossing at an unnamed tributary that runs general!) horn Holy Name Lake to I ong Fake 1 he tributary is a protected water under the jurisdiction of the Department of Natural Restiurces. Ihe culvert installation will require a DNR Permit to Work in Protected W aters I he applicant should also obtain approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. W'e request that a copv of the DNR and MCW D permit applications, as well as all related information, be sent to this office for our files. The plan should include the culvert si/e, grades, mat erials to be used, riprap and erosion control methods to be used during construction. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours ver>’ truly, BONHSTROO, ROSI-NF, A.NDFRLIK it ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r COFUN Si CRON BERG. FNC <•1 • mm jm9 MM «ra •<«« Nwwnbtf 1.1W3 Elen Sones Diririct CoortSnatof Mfwehaha Creek Watershed D^nct 146CX) MmnetorBa Bmjtevard Dear Elen: I have iust talked to John Whitman concent Ns penrot appbcatton 93-180 wtKh in«>l*«» the rstilaUon of ( culvwt to cross an from Holy Namo Lake wtncti leads into anottwf unnamed tributary floweig Into Long lake He apparently talked to Andy Syvwion si your opnm in wrtsig rogardinB the Impact of Uie proposed cuHrert, m regards to 2. under recommmdations Since John will be instaling a culvert equivalent m size to the one downstream wtsch serves two tnbutanes, rattier than the one that is seiv^, I can ^ problam m the saaig of the eutvert. To my knowledgo there las been no problem with the cuhetl downstream which has been there for just under 35 years in effect, the culvert being mstaled by the Wtidmans may actualy be som^l larger than necessary, but t should certair^ have no impact on the propeoy upstream. I am familiar with the area and do not befieve that any further analysis is necessary. Please note that there in another cuh/ert already in place upstream as well. Sincerely. COFFIN & GRONBERG Mark S. Gronberg •V MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 14600 Minnetonlu Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345-1597 317)n9>cn« to OOTNCT TDATOAr Bw*t yfit Apoliotion Mo. Applleastt Joka WkitBaa iS70 «th A»«Bea llortl LonQ Laka» tW 55354 liocatioa: Purposai City of Orooo, Till, *23, Eoc. Ji, SW 1/4 Straao crotain^ inToWinf conatructioo of dri^away and placraoot of culwart in uanfod atraao. Doar Hr. whitmant 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Portnit Application 93-180 recoivad Octobar 7, 1993 Lmttmr from DNP dated January 27, 1993. Letter from applicant received October 12, 1993. Certificate of survey received October 12# 1993. Construction plan received October 12# 1993. Site plan received October 12# 199j. Action was taken to table your paroit application pending receipt and ata£ approval of the following exhibitai 1. 2. City of Orono approval. anaiv.i. nreoared by a professional engineer or ^alified .howing the proposed culvert will not adversely impact property upstream and has adequate hydraulic capacity. .iVLiv. scheduled for November 23, 1993. Sincerely Ellen B. Sones District Administrator EBS/cr Ceil Strauss, DNR Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono 1!0V 2 iSS3 For (1AM 11 AIK » C M mornm^cm ft m. ^ u w m a m , ▼tu )09 ••S ' toft w *« »v, »• r • ▼ •w tOS Sftft OC»'9 ft^lTf JftOO ait Hull‘d*- w •- 9$402 TC« ft<a JJ3 4ftOO fAn ft ! 2 334 ftftftft ••• c t • Lt •} « a»•<-*«.» #« •«# >« « 49 • »4t« ftt I 4ft^« • t f MS ft c Ttw tot #4t t^OO &t¥U4 P. ftT4U*rroi«, EftQ. DfitrcT Dial (• i 1 ) ss4i-«J i O 1 e '1994 March 15. 1994 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administraior City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 Re: Whitman Conditional Use Permit Application Dear Jeanne: Enclosed please find a March 9, 1994 letter from Dan Ryerson and an enclosed Order from the Hennepin County District Court in the matter of Whitman y^I.awrgrtg- Also enclosed please find a copy of ray September 28. 1993 letter to Mr. Ryerson regarding uiis matter. As yo-! mav recall. Mr. Whitman had applied for a Conditional Use Permit to undertake certain work on Tract E of RLS #1418. As I suted iri my letter, the Whitmans do not own t E but have an easement over it. Pursuant to routine City policy, we do not accept applications of this nature without permission from the fee owner oi the property on which the work is *o be performed. Consequently, I advised Mr. W'hitman’s attorney. Mr. Ryerson. in my September 28. 1993 letter that, absent expressed permission from the Lawrences, we would need a Court Order indicating that the Whitmans had the authority to do the work that is the subject of the Conditional Use application (assuming, of course, that they were to receive a Conditional Use permitV 219/220395113/15(94 Ms. Jeanne Mabusih March 15. 1994 Page 2 The Hennepin County District Court has now ruled on Mr. Whitman’s Summary Judgment Motion. Specincally. paragraph 3 of the Coiut’s Order provides "that the easement permits the construction and extension of roadway across Tract E. RLS No. 1418. to served subdivided lots within Tract A. RLS No. 1418." In addition, please note that, on page 5 of the Memorandum in support of the Order, the Court outlines the dilemma the Whitman’s find themselves in. noting that the Whitmans had brought this action and moved for Summary Judgment because "the City had refused to consider [their] application without the written consent of [the Lawrences]." Finally, on page 8 of the Memorandum in support of the Order. the Court states: After reviewing the parties’ contentions, the Court concludes that the scope of the particular easement, as contemplated by the express language of the 1976 deed and by the 1978 easement agreement, is without restrictions as to the geographic location of the easement over Tract E. There is no limiting legal description of the easement, nor is there any other limiting definition of the wasement’s location other than the tract of land origmally platted as a roadway and demarcated as Tract E. Accordingly, from the face of the warranty deed and from the 1978 easement agreement, the whole of Tract E is subject to an easement for driveway purposes, access to County Road 6, and for utilities. ConsequenUy, the Court concluded that the Whitmans "may extend the current roadway over Tract E to serve subdivided lots contained in the northern portion of Tract A." Slip. Op. at 12. Now that the Whitmans’ have obtained the judicial interpretation of the easement that we requested in my September 28. 1993 letter, it is unnecessary for you to obtain permission from the Lawrence’s prior to accepting the Conditional Use Permit. Please feel free to contact me if you have anv questions. via P. Staunton enclosures cc: Ronald Moorse TJBarrett *il9/2;0J95l 13/15/94 Gislason , Martin & V arpness , P.A. ^TTORNfFY^; ANT> CTX/VSFIOR5 AT LAm )AMB T wjtrns* K>IN E. VARfSTSS- PATTUCK M CONUN DAN T RYER50N raiM moMMf Wit rm MAnoMi (umo or TMM /tei^toLMrt RTTIRED ROBERT W ClSL.\SON March 9, 1994 roOC FAKkl.K9TN AV ENUE SOLTM SUTTE 444 KilNNEATOUS. MINNESOTA TtLEFHONE tl^^Ul S79J FAX »U. t)l 7)W UCAi. ASSISTAKTS GLORIA OEER ^'DY THYREN Nfr. Kc% in P. Staunton Attorney at Law 222 Soutii Nbtli Street Suite 3300 Vlinneapolis, MN 55402 RE: ll'Ttitmat Conditional Use Pennii AppHcctiot^City of Orono Dear Mr. Staunton: Reference is made to our telephone discussions during September, 1993 and your letter to me dated September 28,1993. The declaratory judgment proceeding in Whitman y, Lawrence. Hennepin County District Court File No: CT 93-12901, which was the subject of our communications, has now been decided. Enclosed for your review is a copy of the Court's Order and Memorandum dated March 7, 1994. As you can see, the Court’s Order, and in particular parag^ 3, specifically addresses the question tliat was framed by your September 28 letter. Basis for the Order is more fully set out in the Court's attached Nfcrnoraridum, in which it is recognized that the lack of the fee owner's consent to the conditional use application and the inability of the City to proceed with the Whitmans' application in the absence of the consent, is what gives rise to the actioa The Court further specifically took note of your letter in which a resolution of the question by declaratory judgment was contemplated. Thus, the Order granting summary judgment to the Whitmans in the declaratory judgment action has clearly resolved issues and removed the "lack of consent" impediment to their pending application. Accordingly, I am providing a copy of this Order to the City of Orono Zoning Administrator ^v^th the request that the Whitmans' application may now go forward through the usual review and action processes, lhank you for your courtesy and cooperation in helping to Jefine and resr' ; this issue. STATE OF MINNESOTA r" ''F- i:t DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN y- t: {2 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 4. John E. Whitman and Donna Whitman, Plaintiffs,Court File: CT 93-12901 vs.ORDER James F. Lawrence and Aria M. La%rrence, Defendants. The above-captioned matter cane on for hearing on December 7, 1993, before the Honorable Dolores C. Orey, Judge of District Court, on plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Dan T. Ryerson, Esquire, appeared on behalf of plaintiffs; Jonathan Saffold, Jr., Esquire, appeared on behalf of defendants. The Court having considered the file, submissions, and arguments of counsel. XT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiffs* motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. That the easement described in Document No. 1169844, as amended in Docximent No. 1325401, of record in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, does not prohibit Plaintiffs from subdividing the property described as Tract A, RLS No. 1418. 3. That the easement described in Document No. 1169844, as amended in Document. No. 1325401, of record in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, permits the construction and extension of a roadway across Tract E, RLS No. 1418, to serve r 1 subdivided lots within Trsct A, RLS No. 1418.I - - - 4 That subdivision of Tract A does not teminate the easesent described in Oocu-ent No. 11*9844, as amended by Document HO 1325401, and the owners and assigns of Tract A and any portion Ireof may use the easement over Tract 1- Ho. 1418, for _ • k.^ ^ iT>« 2»nd access to Hennepin County Road No. 6 and for driveway purposes and access to utilities. 5. That the attached memorandum is part of this Order trt JOTOHWr M »TW«o xccoboiwly. BY THE COURT: DATED:this 7th day of March, 1994 Dolores C. orey__ _J Judge of District Court - -- - -- J> VhltaiS V, Lavrencm Court File No. CT 93“12901 [ORANDOM This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs John and Donna vniitsan-s motion for sunmary judgment. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment from this Court determining the scope of an easement reserved in a conveyance of real property from Albert and Edith Whitman to Defendants James and Aria Lawrence. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief pursuant to Minn. State s 555.01 (1992). unless otherwise noted, the following facts are undisputed. Albert and Edith Whitman ("the Whitmans") are the parents of plaintiff John Whitman. In the 1960-s, the Whitmans purchased property in Orono, Minnesota, which they subsequently subdivided into five tracts, designated as Tracts A, B, C, D and E. Tracts A, C, and D were each undeveloped and intended for residential building purposes, while Tract B contained the Whitmans resides (Edith Whitman Aff. 1 HD- The fifth tract. Tract E, was intended to serve as a roadway serving the other four tracts. (Isli 1 IV) • Plaintiffs describe Tract E as "a serpentine strip of land 50 feet wide and approximately 1,200 feet long." (Pltf.'s Mem. Supp. Summ. J 0 ft t 1 ) • in 1976, the Whitmans deeded Tracts B and E to Defendants. (Edith Whitman Aff. 1 V; Lawrence Aff. 1 5) the two tracts provided in part: The deed conveying said Tract E (is) subject to afavor of Tracts A, C and D . . . for driveway purpos vAicman v. tawrenc# Court rU* No. CT 93-12901 anH a-cess to County Road No. 6 and for utilities, sublect II agreeLn/ between the parties hereto ttat naintcnance of, and taxes on, said Tract E shall be borne bv thriwners of Tracts A, B, C and D, dependent on use proportionate to linear usage of Tract E computed after a residence has been constructed on a particular tract, j the owner of each tract shall be solely responsible for repair of any damage caused to the road by him or by his agents or subcontractors. (John Whitman Aff. 1 IV, Ex. C). At the time of the conveyance from the Whitmans to Defendants, a driveway had been laid out along a portion of Tract E, between County Road « and the Whitmans' residence on Tract B. (Edith Whitman Aff. M III * IV). The 1976 deed also granted Defendants the right to subdivide Tract B. After acquiring additional acreage. Defendants ultimately subdivided Tract B to create a parcel of land now )cnown as "Tanglewood." (John Whitman Aff. J V; Lavnrence Aff. 1 10). *n outlot on the Tanglewood tract was subsequently dedicated for a roadway to provide the Tanglewood lots access to County Road 6. (John Whitman Aff. 1 V, Ex. D). As a result, the Tanglewood lets did not require the use of the roadway' then existing over Tract E to access County Road 6. on July 28, 1978, the Whitmans and Defendants entered into an "Easement Agreement," which released the Tanglewood lots from the iln their pleadings and at the hearing i Plaintiffs have used the terms 'roadway an Tract interchangeably. The Court concludes that the easement E contemplated a roadway for "driveway purposes and access to Lunty Ro^ad No. 6 and fo/ utilities." Any reference to a roadway in this Order is limited to that purpose. vhicJiMJi V. ZMvrencmCourt File No. C7 93-12901 nainten^nce costs and taxes associated with the roadway over Tract E. Despite modification of the cost and tax sharing structure, the scope of the then existing easement remained substantially the same as the prior easement: ^ 4. r is subject to a non-exclusive [tlhat Tract E . . • * r>f'^Tracts A. C and D . . . easement access to County Road No. 6 and for fu^er that the costs of the * ri T*«»nair of and taxes upon said Tra»-t E maintenance *^®P of Tracts A, C and D . . • shall be borne by the o'™"® ^ linear usages of dependent has ^een constructed Tract E ff"P““j.^VcVor lot! Further, the owner of each on « P*;^^=“^*"3h”rbe responsible for repair of any S^tte cais°e^ the* roal by him or his agent or contractor. The Whitmans conveyed Tract h to Plaintiffs on January 21, 1980. The deed conveying Tract A to Plaintiffs expressly included "a non exclusive easement for driveway purposes and access to County Road NO. 6 and for utilities ..." (John Whitman Aff. i VII, Ex. F; Edith Whitman Aff. 1 IX). Plaintiffs now wish to extend the present roadway over Tract E into the northern undeveloped portion of the tract. Plaintiffs have applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to extend the roadway, but the city has refused to consider Plaintiffs- application without the written consent of Defendants. Defendants have refused to provide that consent. (John Whitman Aff. IX). in a letter to Plaintiffs- counsel, however, an attorney for the city indicated it would accept Plaintiffs- application if Plaintiffs are able to obtain a declaratory judgment V. L»vrmnc9Court rile No. CT 93-12901 fron this Court declaring the scope of the easenent broad enough to allow Plaintiffs' proposed extension of the roadway. (lit, 5 XI, EX. I 4 J) • AS a result. Plaintiffs have brought this action and now move for suimary judgment. The court may render summary judgment "when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue a 1 to any material fact and that either party is entitled to judgment as a natter of law." Minn. R. Civ. P. 56.03; sfifi SjtaniaHl Huiiuck. 318 N.w.2d 240, 242 (Minn. 1982). In deciding the motion, the court must view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. JA^ A party opposing a notion for summary judgment may not simply rest on the averments of the complaint but must affirmatively demonstrate by affidavit or otherwise that material issues of fact remain to be decided. faKman V. gmiM, 285 N.W.2d 95, 97 (Minn. 1985). Plaintiffs contend that the easement reserved to the Whitmans and subsequently conveyed to Plaintiffs permits them to extend the present roadway into the northern undeveloped portion of Tract E. specifically, Plaintiffs contend that "the whole of Tract E, including the portion extending to the north of the present developed roadway, was intended to be used for driveway and access purposes.” (Pltf.'s Mem. Supp. Sumir. J. at 9). Defendants, on the other hand, contend that they never intended for the northern VAicman v. Lawrenc*Court File No. CT 93-12901 portion of Tract E to be used for a roadway. Rather, Defendants claim they have been provided ••with the originally agreed upon option to develop [that portion of Tract E] as we see fit in the future.•* (J* Lawrence Aff. ^ 13) • Although not directly addressed by the parties, the precise issue in this motion is whether the term "subject to/^ as used in the 1976 deed and in the 1978 easement agreement, is sufficient as a matter of law to create a non-exclusive easement over the entire portion of Tract E. Ordinarily, the use of the language "subject to" in a deed purporting to reserve an easement is not sufficient to create express easement: fallthough in certain cases tue use of such [subject to] tenninology has been held sufficient to reserve an ^esement, it should not be employed for this purpose because it does not clearly express the intent of the parties. •Siibject to^ language is commonly used in a deed to refer to existing easements, liens, and real covenants that the grantor wishes to exclude from warranties of title. Jon W. Bruce & James W. Ely, The Law of Easements_and Mgep^es Jn Land, f 3.05[3] (1988). In addition, in Wem^r v. Sample, 259 Minn. 273, 107 N.W.2d 43 (1961), the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the use of the term "subject to" in a warranty deed which purportedly reserved an casement did not create an easement but presupposed an existing easement. Cf., trojan Vj;—Stuebner, 429 N.W.2d 918 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988), pey^ denied December 16, 1988 (citing Werner•s holding but distinguishing it on the basis of the application of the Torrens Act to an unrecorded easement). Ho™3-1=901 The parties to this action, however, do not dispute that the deed between the Hhitsans and Defendants created an easement over Tract E in favor of Tracts A, c, and D, and that the 1978 easement agreement modified the rights and obligations of the various parties who had an interest in the easement at that time. The parties dispute, however, whether the extent of the easement would allow Plaintiff to extend the existing roadway into the northern portion of Tract E. After reviewing the parties' contentions, the Court concludes that the scope of the particular easement, as contemplated by the express language of the 1976 deed and by the 1978 easement agreement, is without restrictions as to the geographic location of the easement over Tract E. There is no limiting legal description Of the easement, nor is there any other limiting definition of the easement's location other than the tract of land originally platted as a roadway and demarcated as Tract E. Accordingly, from the face Of the warranty deed and from the 1978 easement agreement, the whole of Tract E is subject to an easement for driveway purposes, access to County Road 6, and for utilities. Moreover, even if the language of the 1976 deed and the 1978 easement agreement is construed as ambiguous. Defendants have not submitted by affidavit or otherwise evidence of any discussions or agreements the parties had concerning the scope of the a motion for summary judgment must present A party opposing a morion 8 V. L»vT9nc»Court. File No. CT 93-12901specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Minn. R. Civ. P. 56.05. Defendant James Laurence's affidavit does not refer to any discussions between Defendants and the Whitmans as to the geographic scope of the easement, nor does Lawrence set forth any agreement between Defendants and the Whitmans as to the possible restriction of the easement's geographical scope. indeed. Defendants do not dispute Edith Whitman's statement that: we had no intention of limiting^i^^^^^ we could make the T.avrences. tystriotjon ever intended to limit ISiy Moreover, my husband ana i subdivision of any possible future uses, w«e not the subject of Sf our other tracts of land which were not „jth the that deed, ^n-r were siirh patters evey discu^- - - - j^awrences • • • • (Edith Whitman Aff. 1 VI, (emphasis supplied). Further, it is undisputed that Plaintiffs extended the roadway over a portion of Tract E in 1986 to access their home on Tract A. (John Whitman Aff i VIII). in response to the facts presented by Plaintiffs, Defendants have not presented specific facts which would demonstrate that there is a genuine issue for trial as to the alleged ambiguity of the easement documents. Accordingly, summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs as to the geographic scope of the easement over Tract E is appropriate. Plaintiffs also seek a declaratory judgment that they nay subdivide Tract A and subsequently use the easement over Tract E to serve the subdivided lots. Defendants, however, argue that vhltMMn V. LAvr*nem Court: rile No. CT 93-12901 Plaintiffs already have the full use and enjoyment of the roadway easement over Tract E: Plaintiffs' home on Tract A presently has access to County Road 6 by means of Tract E. Defendants contend that extending the roadway into the northern portion of Tract E to serve the northern portion of Tract A is, therefore, beyond the scope of the contemplated easement. Defendants appear to make two arguments in this regard: first. Defendants appear to argue that the 1976 deed and the 1978 easement agreement prohibit Plaintiffs from subdividing Tract A; and second. Defendants argue that the parties to the easement agreement contemplated use of the roadway by only one residence per tract. Defendants therefore contend that Plaintiffs' apparent desire to subdivide Tract A and subject Tract E to use of the roadway by the subdivided lots is not supported by the language of the 1976 deed and the 1978 easement agreement. At the hearing on this motion, however. Defendants acknowledged that the deed and the easement agreement do not purport to limit Plaintiffs' ability to subdivide Tract A. Rather, Defendants contend that local zoning ordinances governing Plaintiffs' property will not allow subdivision of Tract A. The issue of the application of local zoning ordineinces to the potential subdivision of Tract A, however, is not properly before the Court. Further, to the extent Defendants contend that Plaintiffs may not subdivide their property on account of the 1976 deed and the 1978 easement agreement, such an interpretation of i ^ r VhitmAfi r. Court rile No. CT 93-12901 those documents is misguided. There is nothing in cither document which purports to limit Plaintiffs* right to subdivide Tract A. As to whether stibdivided lots within Tract A may make use of the easement appurtenc t to that tract, the law in that regard is clear: a right of way which is appurtenant to an estate is appurtenant to every part of it, no matter into how many parts it may be subdivided, and it inures to the benefit of the owners of all subdivisions so situated that it can be used. Sorkil V. Strom. 156 Minn. 155, 158, 194 N.W. 333, 334 (1923)* Defendants nevertheless contend that the use of the term **a residence" in the cost-sharing provision of the 1976 warranty deed purports to limit the use of the easement to one residence on each of Tracts A, C, and D. Although there appears to be some ambiguity in the 1976 deed as to whether the easement is intended to serve more than one residence on a particular tract, the 1978 easement agreement, which modified the easement's cost and tax sharing arrangement, provided: that the cost of the maintenance and repair of and taxes upon said Tract E shall be borne by the owners of Tracts A, C, and D . . . dependent upon use proportionate to linear usages of Tract E computed after a residence has been constructed on a particular tract or lot. Further, the owner of each tract or lot shall be responsible for repair of any damage caused to the road by him or his agent or contractor. (John Whitman Aff., Ex. E)(emphasis supplied). The inclusion of the term "lot," in addition to the reference to the then existing tracts, clearly indicates that use of the VAiCaafl V. Lsvr*nc0 Court Pil* Mo. CT 93-12901 roadway over Tract E would not be limited to a single residence on the then existing tracts. Rather, the clear language of the 1978 easement agreement allows use of the easement by subdivided lots within each of the dominant tracts. As this is also consistent with existing Minnesota law. Plaintiffs may extend the present roadway to serve subdivided lots within Tract A. For the foregoing reasons. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiffs may extend the current roadway over Tract E to serve subdivided lots contained in the northern portion of Tract A. Furthermore, there is nothing in the 1976 deed or 1978 easement agreement which prevents Plaintiffs from subdividing their property D.C.O. r P O P H A M H A 1 K SC«NO»PiCh S #1 o '-'w^V U % OrriccA OC»wC«. COcOAAOO TCi. X>3 MS 1200 Ttu S09 SSO-OO?© S u • T f 3 300 222 Sout »4 n .n ^h Stwcct MlMMIA^OkiS. MiNmCSOTA I3S402 TCI. •I2 333-4SOO Fai CI2-334C089 AM** rOWAC OAVKIA aCAMAM* ▼Cw OftAA SAI «4t841« frw^OAAI. GfAWANV ttw 01 »49 ?n 2f«303 tM»i«aro««, DC Ttk 202 M2 4700 KEVIN P. STAUNTON. CSQ. OiNCCT OiAV 1«I2| 934^310 September 2S, 1995 Sri' 3 3 *.S93 Mr. Daniel Ryerson 7600 Park Lawn Suite 444 Edina, Minnesota 55435 Re: John E. and Donna M. Whitman Conditional Use Permit Application Dear Mr. Ryerson: This firm represents the City of Orono. I am writing on behalf of the City regarding the above-referenced matter. As I understand it, your clients, the Whitmans, have submitted a conditional use permit application to the City requesting permission to undertake certain work on Tract E of RLS #1418. The Whitmans do not own Tract E but have an easement over it. Their neighbors tlte Lawrences are the fee owners of the Tract As you know, the City has refused to accept the Whitmans* application until they obtain permission from the fee owners of the property. The City routinely requires such permission to ensure that the applicant is legally authorized to engage in the proposed work You have informed me that the Lawrences have refused to grant permission. As a result, the Whitmans have commenced a lawsuit in district court seeking a declaration that the easement granted to the Whitmans is sufficiently broad to legally authorize the work proposed by the Whitmans. I am writing to inform you that if the district finds that the easement is sufficiently broad to legally authorize the type of work contemplated by the Whitman’s Conditional Use Permit or other applications, the City will waive its requirement that permission be obtained from the underlying fee owner before an application will be accepted. 2J9/220228679/2WJ r \lr. Daniel Ryerson September 28. 1993 Page 2 Please understand, however, that in waiving this requirement, the City will make no representauon as to the ments of the Whitman’s application. If the Whitman’s obtain the appropnate coim order allowing their applicauon to be accepted without express permission from the underlying fee owner, the City will consider that applicauon on its merits as it would have had the neighbtus originally given permission. This docs not, of course guarantee that the application will be granted. J hppe this intormaiion is helpful to you. Please call if you h.rve further questions of need additional information. ^ cc: Ron Moorse Mike Gaffron TJBarrett 219/22022867 9/2 8A>3 '^O,^ o 'Vi *'' t ■f/ September 28, 1993 CITY of ORONO Street Mdress: 27W Kelley Partway Orono. WN 55356 Municipal Oftices Mailini Address P 0. Bo* 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 » X ') iMr. and Mrs. John E. Whitman 1570 6lh Avenue North Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re: Incomplete Application Dear Mr. and Mrs. Whitman; The City is in receipt of your application for a conditional use permit to construct a driveway within Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 1418. After reviewing your application, we find that it is incomplete, and therefore cannot be scheduled for the October 18th Planning Commission meeting. The application is considered incomplete because it has not been signed by the owner of Tract E, James F. Law rence. It is standard City practice to require the signature of both the applicant and the property owner where the applicant is not the fee owner of the property. I would also note that the easement agreement included with your application. Document No. 1325401 refers a number of times to Easement Document No. 1169844, a copy of which we hereby request that you provide. It is my understanding that you are proceeding to obtain a declaratory judgment in regard to specific rights for use of Tract E. As our city attorney has outlined in a letter to your attorney, such a judgment which clearly confirms your rights to use Tract E as requested in your application, will substitute for the owner’s signature. Also, please have your engineer provide the City with the size of culvert proposed together with supporting information and data. You should also be proceeding concurrently with gaining approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distric and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Mr. and Mrs. John E. Whitman September 28. 1993 Page 2 P.casc contact me or Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm Kevin Staunton, City Attorney I r To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ma'’cr Cr*Uahan and Orono CounciImembcrs Ron Moorsc, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mahusth. Building & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1994 #1912 Tim Hillman, 400 Ijeaf Street - Variances -Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards A.Froni/street setback variance Required = 50 ’ Existing = 23.3 ’ Proposed ^ 28’ Variance =» 22' or 44% B Side setback variance - South side Required = 30 ’ Existing = 31.9’ Proposed = 25.2’ Variance = 4’ 8" or 16% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage review. Total lot area = 36.239 s.f.*‘ (167 x 217). Area excludes 33 s.f. of right-of-way for Leaf Street Allowed = 5.435.8 s.f. or 15% Existing = 3.069.3 s.f.** or 8.4% Proposed = 5,121.1 s.f.*' or 14.1% Note area of gravel drive on south side of property has not been sh»wn nor was it in legal description of property. An access easement in tavoro properties to east does not exist. The area of the easement would have been excluded from total lot area. *^ Existing lot coverage House = 752.4 s.f. Playhouse = 72.3 s.f. Shed = 264 s.f. Existing garage = 1,032.2 s.f. Pole barn = 948.4 s.f. i • c:»Jc nn Second floor deck is not included in lot coverage as applicant advises it is no longer proposed. Addition = 2,051.8 s.f. Zoning File H9\2 April 14, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners' List C - Plat Map D - Hardship Statement E - North West Elevations - Roiif Plan F - Soutli''East Elevations - First Floor Plan G - Second Floor Plan and Deck H - Survey I - Engineer ’s Report 4/13/94 Description of Request Applicant proposes a two -story addition to the east and north of the existing residence that will be two times as large as the existing 752.4 footprint of the existing house. The addition includes a two-level garage at rear or east side of residence. Applicant wishes to extend addition along existing front and side of residence requiring setback variances. Review Exhibit D. applicant ’s hardship statement. The property is now served with sewer connected in May of 1993. Applicant prov ided City with an easement to extend sewer along north lot line of propert>' to serve properties to the east of residence. The width of the easement is not shown on the updated survey nor the exact location of the culvert that drains beneath the driveway at the north side ot property and eventually to pond to northwest. The neighbor to the immediate north has voiced concern with additional drainage from new construction increasing runoff and storage of drainage on his already severely limited property. Staff has completed a site inspection with the City Engineer. He notes that the majority of drainage from this structure can be directed to the culvert at the southwest comer of property that drains under Leaf along the north side of Bayside and eventually to Stubbs Bay. All downspouts will be directed to the southwest drainage ditch. Review' Exhibit F. Note that the driveway shall be raised and allow drainage to flow to the south. It is not clear from the preliminary’ information received whether applicant plans to install a new foundation. If this is the case, this would be the opportunity to relocate house at a conforming setback. If there is to be further expansion of the second floor above the existing residence, the City will require confimiation that the existing foundation can support the expansion. Applicant should provide Planning Commission with more detail as to the amount of filling and cutting to be done. Review Exhibit E, the north elevation shows cutting into the bank at the northeast comer providing a lower access door to the north yard from the lower level garage. To date we have not received to-scale drawings of elevations so it is difficult to confimi the exact height of the addition but it does not appear that there will be problems with the height. innw RXS^I Rinpj aiinmnis awri]i^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) - Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) •jS/ ^ C < Variance for non conforming use $200.00#/^ J ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Hoo L c<lP ST._______________________ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D. ) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired S//9i/)_ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do)(do nojt) also own the adjacent parcels of land. CITY 8F ORin^Q Present use of property: X residential __ _other (specify) rri-^'iirr nrcrrc Zoning District: .-n-RRMA .. ..' a w'cVi. V V'Vvv *“ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I APPLICANT Phone (home) li s RECtlPT-THARKYC^' • / A1 rrlLLir^cufX_______________ Phone (wor)c) if298690 COOl ROi 709:1 i» • /I’ D/t Vv.^' VU*/ Address: Hoo L^<kf ST _________ City: Lcf\J Lct-k^ Zip: SS ‘3S"C OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)__________________ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Phone (worJc)__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Est^^j^]^d^C^^truqt^^^^ Describe reque^ in detail jC4AC(r.X*^^'m /o X /d * ■ ■?. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ VARIANCES REQUIRED —bot Area _ _ Lot Width _ _ Hardcover Lot Coverage X Setbac)c: X Front X Side _ _ Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore _ _Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual tyroperty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirementsRj^i^^ * ’- ,2J^' ^L/ 7.^ l o^tTZ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered cooiplete; 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j'*xll'' for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>j"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*i"xll"). 7. _^As an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date 3-7-7^/ ONNERS SIGiiATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Sicmature Date 3 7 ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Comniission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise * he Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • !> MM OATf 9Z/tZ/n •r-?•■' . iATCM 00% ^ ^•V :•>WP AOM OUHtn NMC TAXPAYER NAK/AQDRVa-% 'VPROP AOOR CPfCR HAHi TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR »r '? I PROP ATOR , Olt€R NAME TAXPAYER ' ,lttME/AOOR » * • r - PROP AOOR OHNER HAHE TAXPAYER • NAME/AOOR * %i ^0%-117-El 21 000% 00170 LEAF ST ROOYN HARIE STEHART RQOYN HARIE STEHART 170 UAF ST tONO LAKE m S515410 0%-ll7-21 21 0007 OOlfO LEAF ST KATHRYN A ANDERSON KATHRYN A ANDERSON 190 LEAF ST LONG LAKE m 5515% 10 0%-U7-21 12 0007 01190 SUSSEX RO N N A 0 C NILDHAN NINA N A DONALD C NILIXUN 7%5 SPRING HILL RO HAYZATA MN 55191 • V. .- • , . • *•, 10 05-117-21 1% 0059 00175 LEAF ST ELIZAOETH P VOGT ELIZAOETH P VOGT 175 LEAF ST . LONG LAKE NN 5515% k, ^ • ' ' .V- >V •: u:'-;♦I.;T * V’*-. . t: : ; . . • ^ r.'j H V - . • .■• C’:-. •• ' . <> 4* ' .r‘v4 ^ #»• II > : r HEftlEPINtf44#%i } I 0 i \ f \ \ ! COUNTY PROPERTY IHFOmATION SYSTEM • PROPERTY ONNERS LIST18 OH-117-21 21 000500570 LEAF ST ROBYN MARIE STEHART ROOYN MARIE STEHART 170 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 5555%18 0%-117*2S 25 0009005%0 LEAF STH C FURCHNER JR ETALHENRY FURCHNER1%0 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 5555% 18 0%-117-25 52 0008 051%0 SUSSEX RO N H I D C NILDHAN NINA H A OCNALO C HIlDHAN 7%5 SPRING hill RO HAYZATA MN 55591 18 05-117-25 %1 0018 05211 8AY3IDE RD A J ROBBINS A T L ROBBINS ARNOLD J ROBBINS 1211 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE m 5555% \ REPORT NO. PAGE18 0%-1172S 21 000%00058 ADDRESS UNASSIMO ROBYN HARIE STEHART ROBYN HARIE STEHART T 170 LEAF ST LONG LAKE HN 5515%58 08-117-25 25 001000800 LEAF ST E T A S A HILLMAN TIMOTHY HILLMAN 800 LEAF ST LONG LAKE HN 5555% 18 05-117-25 18 0007 05200 BAYSIDE RO RAT MINKEMA ROBERT L A TERESA H MINKEMA 1200 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 5515% TOTAL BATCH 008 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS or THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPEI^IY TAXATION, TO IHE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEFBELIEF. / / •> ,'t • * • . .-tv. «- • > ♦* . « Front Yard Setback Variencg Our existing house, west wall is 23.3 feet fro» the street, side property line (front yard setback). We would like to expand our living room, which is 28 feet fron the west property line. The only direction we can expand our living room is north. We would like to follow^he existing living room west wall going north for our addition . Side Yard Setback Varience Our existing entryway to our basement on the south side yard is only 3 feetwide. To accomodate a split level entrywav it will require a 10 foot area. The south side yard is the only feasible place we can have the main entrance to our house. i' 'TTfV' X l-(t I( J “ spur /\ r~!IT m DtCK I . i ' 1 I I I J (T' V ' J I * .«J cO H.w. '■ V,' » a J-I "" ■ uT6^ V'f^vb >irtitT»^ -,fPi)POS^D ,OecK !Z'm2Z,S >fj 1---------------— l§* 1' - - ~ I I I CFUT L I fMT«y 1 r. •; < t t “ I 2f«% Liclf -ITT I I I I III n'I t I I I iO BW.ICK FACADE PN eHiPAAID E0UN»ATIOM^*k<W mSfi^ jl.>l nrrm riT^TTl amv I I E.r 1___/O CDPTilil—L—J —— ---------------- Msiri CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TIM HILLMAN IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 4-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Legal Doscription (from Owner) That part of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest (luarter of Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: lloginning at the West quarter corner post of said Section 4; tlence running north along the section line a distance of 2IV.8 feet; tlience east 200.00 feet; thence south 217.80 feet; taenev^ west 200 feet, containing 1.0 acre, more or les!i. Fci purposes of this survey the east and nortn lines are assumed to be parallel with the west and south lines of said quarter section. This survey shows the Location of all existing buildings in relation to the bc.undarios as stated above, and some [proposed additions t’lereon. It does not purport to sliow any other improv(MiH?nts or encroach ments . (77/.S) : Existing elevation • : Iron mariner found o : Iron marker set C(HH\ & Gronberg, Inc.I hereby cerlily '.ml this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision. and tha ‘ 1 am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of Ih • State of Minnesota. I M\ Mark S. G onberg Minnesota License Nuni^'r 12755 daff. 5-14-93 SCALE r'^SO' ivtiNu 93-187 ^ i Bonestroo Rosene AndellkA |\j| Associates Engineers A Architects April 13, 1994 Om C w c & G0tv»« C e MvitA torw CfA n- H H- w »ei»* *i DM C MMA »l ,«rry A tM«\ H %«#rA A NtntOA M mi^sm f tfcjr^n ff IMI Mm A^mtx AlA C i^spim M TM^MtC AngiA n MKMilfiM. n ' / m •Af A X ^• >-ap-\ Pf i k Pf w ff n. C n 0^ a AMotm Pi, f PpHir. P| D Pf t Pf Mr J AsgaAf*. H OPygiPi ; aproi P| mntmA p ArmmK P| Miri 1 %a ^Cicvt OiMi» Pf NmO HM» pf OMf w Myyi pr ii^nPtem ail Otnm j tdy»mr Pf CnjAH A A ftga&Mkidi Pf sfvm PfwMp P*Mii CdMP^Pf Hjnjr M aw Mart a Pg P fngrPtrar Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Cr>*stal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Hillman House Addition FUe No. 139-1912 Dear Jeanne, We have inspected the site of the proposed house addition on Tim Hillmao ’s property. The site is located on the east side of Leaf Street, south of the Luce Line, in the northwest comer of Section 4. The majority of the lot drains north through a culvert and drainage swale to a ponding area on the neighboring lot The culvert and swale function poorly and for this reason we would recommend that no additional runoff be directed to the north. Most of the eusting house hardcover, downspouts and sump pump lines appear to drain south and west to an existing culvert under Leaf Street near the southwest comer of the lot We recommend that the future addition be equipped with downspouts. All downspouts and sump pump lines should be directed south to this culvert where possible, to avoid an increase in the runoff to the neighboring property. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. !214 West Venture — **'» - ••• - \r To;Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan ami Orono Councilmembcrs Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator April 13. 1994 #1913 Greg TruchLmski, 1580 Fox Street - After-thc-Fact Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances ! I 1. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.28. Subdivision 3 (A) - [Review Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (K)]. Applicant must first obtain a coralitional use permit before installing an independent tower/antenna structure. Structure was installed sometime in the fall of 1993 and was noted by staff during a building inspection for an adjacent property. Structure must meet 85' setback as totd stnicnire is 85’ in height. The tower/antenna structure must meet an 85’ setback from all lot lines. Required = 85’ Proposed = 32’ Variance = 53’ or 62.3% Section 10.75, Subdivisions I and 2 - The above referenced section limits height to 65’. These code sections would allow increases of height above 65’ by applying for a conditional use permit. The code docs not limit height as long as required setback is met. Section 10.03. Subdivision 9 (D) - No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot. Section 10.28. Subdivision 3 (A) - Suggests that an independent antenna structure must be subordinate to or supportive of principal use yet this code section refers only to detached garages or other accessory buildings. The tower cannot be classified as an accessor/ building. List of Exhibits F - Application Addendum Property Owners ’ Lbt and Certification of Renotification Plat Map Survey-Existing Survey-Proposed Ir Zoning File #1913 April 13. 1994 Page 2 G - Elevation Tower/Antenna H - Amateur License I - Article entitled "Antennii Height and Communications Effectiveness" J - Specifications-Universal Towers K - Neighbors ’ Petition of Approval L - Appeals Before United States Coun of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Description of Request Applicant has installed an independent tower/antenna structure at a total 85’ height without the benefit of a building peniiil ami the required conditional use permit. The antenna, tower and base was installed by applicant. The struemre was observed by the inspectors some time in October of 1993. Applicant was advised of the need to apply for a conditional use permit. Review Exhibit E. It is applicant’s first choice to have the existing structure approved at a 32’ setback requiring a setback variance. A copy of applicant’s amateur radio license has been submitted confirming the use is solely for private and hobby use. Applicant resides in residence on property as required by ordinance The use is subordinate to or accessory to the principal residential use. The property is owned bv Whitney MacMillan and Mr. MacMillan has signed the application. Review Exhibits D and L. The property to the immediate east is owned by David MacMillan. Please note, the petition has not been signed by David MacMillan. It is Mr. MacMillan ’s property to the immediate east that receives the most impact as structure would be IcKated 32’ from his lot line. The applicant has submitted an auoezjdum and photos depicting the antenna from various adjacent elevations. Clearly this is not a question of visual or aestlietic impacts upon adjacent properties, but for the City this is a matter oi ;'«‘'^tection of private property. The setback is established so that if the struemre was to collapse it would result in no physical damage to the adjacent property or structures on that property. If the City is to approve a conditional use permit for applicant, the struemre would have to be relocated to meet the 85’ setback from all lot lines. I'here is no doubt that there is less of a visual impact upon the David MacMillan property at this location than at the northwest front yard location where structure would meet the 85’ setback, review Exhibit F. The elevations are higher. The adjacent trees would provide less of a visual buffer. It would be most helpful if the City could receive some input from Mr. MacMillan as lO his position regarding the two locations of the antenna. If the 32’ setback is more acceptable to Mr. MacMillan, then the City may accept a hold harmless agreement from David MacMillan whereby City would not be held responsible for any damage done to the property if antenna/tower struemre was to collapse. \%SMS ITlWl* MIVU THTtnngr ^l9l@ mj . T CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLIG4CUON jl PROPERTY LOCA’nC^ Site Address rOY ^ ( 13 #19 M(/ s r?^ ( ft ± <o Type of Application to be Filed______ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICANT Name C^ FT- T Address TC V r ""___________ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)'77h~^G Z I ______ Phone (work) ^ I - ^ ^ ^ V- WGt A City nir }jC________Zip^C 3^( Phone (home)__________________ Name _ Address l ^ \ Phone (work)_ Citv 'Tir, Date Property Acquired ____________________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use S2(X).00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $1(X).00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee (month/year) OTHER .APPLICATIONS _____$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____ $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Distriwt______ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. requirep submittals 1 . tX Completed Application Form. ___ Desenbe requert ^ owners within 350 ’ iy oxi can obtain this list from Finance. A-603. Govennnen. Center, 348-3:71). ^ cenmefte of Suney (signed by a licensed suneyor) - refer to handout for sursey you wish notified of this application. VOU ARE REQUIRED TO StTPLY 30 "scardraX^a?. d™ ntents, pla.. etc. to be submitted.) The Aoolicant and Property Owoer must sign this application. Plea-- remember that your ^plicatton is not complete if the above mlotmation has not been inc.uJfu. Certincation by Clerical Department that Utnd Use .Application is complete. ^ Initials of Clerical Slaff:___--------------------------------- — - ^JTappIkaltembTal^^^ provide all imonna.mn re^irri orr r: ~ supplied is true and correct to the best ofj^/her taowledge. !)L*-* r OWNER’S SIGNATURE i nnH further authorized reasonable members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. - Date.Owner’s signature 5 - (W Applicant ntus. have al, sabnnnals into the CIO- oincc 25 days befo. d» Pla^g ^^“^^^“Tall Mecung. arc held on dte dtird Mont^y of “ o«tin,. of this change pner to the meeting. r i I o V ! r Oct. 26,1993 Greg Truchipski 1580 Fox St. VVavzata Mn. 55391 476^9631 H. unlisted 621*5185 Pager. ft Dear Sirs: This is to let you know I wish to cooperate with you fully on the matter of my existing antenna structure. I of course am hopeful that you will allow me to keep the system up as is. Included in my permit appUcation are photo’s from the neighbors house’s. Plus photo’s of other prominent antenna installations. As you can see in the photos, even with all the leaves fallen, my antenna installation is completely hidden from my neighbor's. With leaves on, you have to drive in front of my house to see it. When I’ve climbed to the top and stood on the top rung of the support structure, you cannot see any man made buildings when leaves are on the trees, and only some outline of my two closest neighbors house’s with leaves gone. Bo^ house’s are more than 350 ft. from my house. It is difficult for me tO SCg it as a visual burd.£Q on anybody. Please, if you could, take a look at the document "Antenna Height and Communication.- Effectiveness ” that I've included. Prepared by the American Radio Relay League. Also included is a drawing of the support structure, the three important anteimas, and their heights. This is all 1 do, other than a little hunting. I work, and then talk to the world. I have a large sum of money tied up in this sophisticated antenna system. The antenna system is the heart of my hobby. This is also more than just a hobby. The Fedral Communication Commission is very pro-amateur radio because of our overwhelming public service record. Included with this application are 38 examples of that, which is just the tip of the iceburg. As of 1985 the FCC requires state and local goverments to use the least restrictive means available to meet legitimate zoning purposes. e CERTIFICATE OF MAlLTHO STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ) } ES. ) ) rhf- ritv of Orono, Hennepin County, 1, Jamie Bosm, “^that a Notice of Public Hearing Minnesota, do mailed to the attached concerning the matter or list of property owners. in witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of April, 1994. a Jamie Bdsma V • 'mmi tkATM A^[*f -' ".MCWN MTI Xt/2ft/9S . ,f' *.i•4TCH 001 * - ^|-%•>.4' pmm AODfi^NCItCPIN COUNTY PIIOPEKrY INTORHATION SrSUH , PROPtirr 0N^€RS LIST RCPORT NO. PAK V- '■ ^ ^’-iC* 1 • ‘ . ^ ' ' 0 ' *:%1* 02-117>» 2S OOM f 00S97 OMMO OIKtURO RD S 'OMCK NAHE^r' 0 0 • K H HACnULAN TAXPAYER« i OAVXO 0 HACniLLAN NAM/AOOR.;. PO MX 9SOO DEPT 28 XPLS MN 554A0 IA ;. -a V SB 02-117-2S 25 0007 01580 FOX ST HHITNEY HACNlllAN HHITNEY HACHIILAN IS^O FOX ST HAYZATA m 555fl 58 02-117-25 25 000800058 AD08ISS UNASSlGNlO LONQIllDGi ASSOC LONCHIOGC ASSOC C/O POBCPT J THfILW P 0 80X 95000CPT 28 MPLS m 5S8M> 4^ ' 9- ^ - -r-ti M . 02-117*2S 52 0081 PROP AOOR '•X' OMCR NAME. ' .EDMARO H HATtl 00A8S ORONO ORCHARD RO S i TAXPAYER f^r EDNARO HERSEY HAIMcr-* kNAXE/AOM^^: 408 ST PETER ST 8440 . . <*► fl . • 11,4 * O •* J ■’ ST PAUL MN 55102 58 02-117-25 52 0008 01580 FOX ST MMITNEY MACMIILIAN HHITNEY MACMILLIAN 1580 FOX ST NAYZATA MN 55581 58 02-117-25 12 0007 01570 FOX ST S H llfYNC».0S ADO REYI8H.0S S N PEYNOLOS ADD PEYNOLDS 1570 FOX ST HAYZATA MN 55581 *• #•^ * y *A''m AOOP 00058 * • 58 02-117-25 52 0008 AODPESS UNASSI^D \ CPtCP NAME : HHITNEY MACMILLAN "taxpayer ^ HHITNEY MACMILLAN 1580 FOX STNAME/AOOP 4., J iJv HAYZATA m 55591 I i SB 05-117-23 18 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO CARGILL MAC MILLAN JR ETAL LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES P 0 BOX 8500 OEPT 28 MPLS MN 55880 58 05-117-25 18 0001 01880 FOX ST SUSAN V NORTON NORHEST SANK TRUST REAL ESTATE 8TH A MARQUETTE MPLS MN B5H78-0088 L '-x^v ' ^rti: , PROP AOOR • i - V «/. , OMNCR NAME,y‘!,:i!' TAXPAYER 'W \ NMC/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 005 00009 : .r .1, ,K-^ %* « 9 J i f.- vr-*.; ,1 n*; • • .4, • ■'f *■If . • '1 • 1 :l y *'>• • * #• \^^8C -iL . % 1 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRcSENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE 8EST OF MY KNOHLEOCE AND BELIEF. ' " I-;"'/A' ** A'V f ' , • - ,*• * ’ a. f •• i . * 'i n *i OAT joiaite • *4^ * < ! .. m *r'} A *1 \'- r.v"*r^v: ;;V' •L' . -A •^4'’fV: » 4 1 « f \ ' 4 A jl t C* ^ . .-.‘iW.f- • —V,. V „i-:X 1 o»o4 r ■ • i'^. m. 4 Malch \incC^^® Shec"! Z'J -CTS oo- ^ >^ ' ! T 'j. IV • I t « • Z'. ! ■^ T) ' f-\ I,.- I- • H6 corrutf" Sec 2, betnq a*> y l/Z accoram^ hi*3^iu/oiy ^33 fe« S. Vine ofHhc NW.U4.of Sefr ‘A- '^*N.line of . \\4. o* > u \p 3-^ ^ c £ C cp S^ c 3 u.o 0o cu >o •*' Q; A> 0-^-^ M a; p tn ^ c :j o TJ d; r* cu u 1580 Fox St Greg Truchinskl 476-9M^ 621;5185 Pager. ^ ^ c- r •A *%• *^'-*» 0 • .' •..**• • • f. % •..•.•••'*%t ^v. * •* •••■**- -• ' • • • * « • --rr • - ‘.-v*- : •. .w • • -^kV,.•• > ... •• . . - r -•••^ • • - . ► • . r- ^:. 7 - » * V.*' .• « • - . ■ <■ v' V-'i»' .- •- - •.,• •.' r « • • :■■}•{•• . • ‘ ■ ■' ' ' . . '. ■• -.* ■ ' • ‘•V • w ••• • *■•. ' ‘ ■». ^ . " * * - ... . % •»• • ^ ‘ 'r^•.' •• \x-. - ■-••• • /t^UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE NVflP GREG J TRUCHINSKI 1580 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 SpacI al Conditions -.'5 . ■• iX- - • ■•^ -• *. ... r •44 ft / / • 'i'i r i - .^ #f <*: ^1 /^. * :X^ Antenna Height and Communications Effectiveness r «. • “EXECUTIVE SUMMARY** Amateur Radio communications between two distant points on the earth rety on signals propagating through the ionosphere Acting as somewhat of a mirror at heights m the order of 150 mites, the ionosphere returns signals to the earth a thousand or more miles away. ^ . The vertical angle of radiation is the Key factor in determining effective communications distances beyond line of sight For the greatest possiblr communications distance, the energy from the transmitter must be radiated at angles close to the horizon. For this to take place, a horizontal antenna must be placed high above the ground in terms of wavelengths The length of a radio wav6 IS inv6rs6iy re!at6d to its frequency A beam type of antenna at a height of 70 feet or more will provide greatly superior performance over the same antenna at 35 feet, all other factors being equal. To a distant rece'vmg station, a transmitting antenna a‘ 70 feet will provide the effect of approximately 3 to 4 times more transmitter power than the same antenna at 35 feet. Depending on the level of noise and interference, this performance disparity is often enough to mean the difference between making distant radio contact with fairly reliable signals, and being unable to make distant contact at ail. Thus, the antenna at 35 feet is un satisfactory. while the same antenna at 70 feet is quite satisfactory. The 70-fool height is used only for the purpose of illustration, however, and should not be construed as the optimum height for antennas. Heights above 100 feet will give significantly better performance than at 70 feet. If an amateur operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, it is reasonable to assume he will obtain more powerful transmitting equipment to compensate for the loss of antenna effectiveness For example, he might increase his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1.5 kilowatts, to compensate for a three-fold loss in antenna effectiveness because of height limitations. This increase m power, in turn, increases the possibilities for his signal to overload nearby television and radio receivers, creating interference tor viewers and listeners. A high amateur antenna provides a greater degree of immunity from television interference than does a low antenna. The sole source of radiated RF energy from the Amateur Radio station is its antenna Raising that antenna to an increased height, well above the level of existing antennas for television reception, will reduce the possibility of interierence to television reception from fundamental overload. Antenna Height and Communications Effect veness Bv I Hai! KlTD AsstK aitf Technica' Ed»t4x The purpose of ‘ns paper is intoffTiation aDout cornmunicat^c'^s eh-^tueness as related to the physical heigh; o< antennas The pe'forrr.ancfe of honzcnta! antennas at heights 35 and 70 feet iS examined in detail Ven cai arrays are not considered her*’ oecaoso at shc^-Aave treg;^enoes over average terrain ana at Ica 'jo alien angies mev are less ehecti^e thar. ere nor ;:-:ai anterrnas Ionospheric Propagation Freouencies cetween 3 anc 30 nieganerte taP- previoted WHz) are chen called the ’ short-wave" bands In engineering terms tnis range of frecuencies is defined as the high-frequencv or HF portion ot the radio spectrum HF radio cemmun ’cations Petween two points that are separated Cy d star ’“»\ d* more I'.an about 15 to 25 miles depend almost solely upon propagation of radio signals through the ionosphere. The ionosphere IS a region of me earth’s upper atmosphere which is lOhired by ultraviolet rays received from the sun The ionosphere has the propedy that it will refract or bend radio vaves whicn pass through it However, the ionosphere is not one single "blanket" of ionization Instead, for reasons not fully understood, a few discrete layers are formed at different heights above the earth From the standpoint of radio propagation, each ionized layer has distinctive '•hi^ricteristics. related primarily to different amounts c! ration in the various layers The ionized layer wh - is most useful for HF radio com munications IS . iiied the F layer The F layer exists a! neights varying from approxi mately 130 to 260 miles aoove the eartn's surface Both the layer height and the amount c‘ ionization depend upon the latitude from the equator the time of day the season of the year, ana upon the level of sunspot activity Sunspot activity vanes generally m cycles tnat a^e approximately 11 years n duration although short-term bursts of activity may create cha.nges m propagation conditions that last for less than an rour The ionosphere is not homogeneous, and is undergoing continual change The F layer disappears at mght m periods of low and medium solar activity, as tne uhraviolet energy required to sustain ionization is no longer received from the sun The arriount of bending that will be imparled to a passing radio wave is related directly to the intensity of ionization in this layer, and to trie frequency of the radio wave. A triangle may thus be used to portray the cross- sectional path of ionospheric raoio-wave travel, as shown ih Fig 1. The base of the triangle is the surface of the f . A’f • •• A >. -X» ’ • t *♦ 4 k*’- Fig i_A Simplified cross-sectional representation of ionospheric propagation Typically the F layer exists at a height of 150 miles above the earth at mid-latitudes The distance between the transmitter and the receiver may range from a few miles to 2500 mi'es under normal conditions. earth between two distant points, and the apex of me triangle is the point which represents refraction ir. the ionosphere If all the necessary conditions are met. the radio wave wil! travel from the first point on the earth s surface to the ionosphere, where it will be bent suf ficiently to travel to the second point on the earth, many hundreds of miles away Of course the earth's surface is not a flat plane, but instead is curved High-frequency radio waves behave in essentially the same manner as light waves —they tend to travel in straight lines, but with a slight an.ount of downward bending caused by refraction m t.ce air For this reason it .s not possible to communicate b.* a direct path over distances greater than about 15 to 25 miles in this frequency range The curvature of the earth causes the surface to "fall away' from the path of the radio wave v/ith greater distances The'-efore it is the ionosphere that permits HF ra'^'o communication to be made between points separated by tnousands of miles. The range of frequencies from 3 to 30 MHz is unique in this respect, as ionospheric propagation is not consistently supported for any frequencies outside this range. One of the necessary conditions for 'onospneric communications is that the radio wave must encounter the ionosphere at the correct angle This ■$ illustrated in Fig 2. Radio waves which leave the earth at high angles above the horizon rnay receive only very slight bending, and are then lost to outer space For the same fixed frequency of ooera" as the radiation angle is lowered toward the horizon, a point is reached where the bending of the wave is sufficient to return the wave ■s ive the lelow he vered efleciion nsmitted vy lines) top path although to signal #1 power en times ive. (The sp wave, le earth, lity of ail :tors in vels are dB. The fference 0 of 2:1; of 10:1. )Out 7 to ficant at jistance )0 miles stration. r a 1/10 gnal will B below hat only jditional second ore than eceived Table 1—Propagation Distance versus Radiation Angle (Data extracted from Fig 3) Wi « I Fig 3—Distance plotted against wave angle (one-hop transmission) for the nominal range of virtual heights for the E and F2 layers, and tor the FI layer. The second important point to be recognized in multihop propagation is that the trigonometry of the first hop generally establishes the trigonometry for ait succeeding hops And it is the radiation angie at the transmitter wnich sets up the trigonometry for the first hop Solving a propagation triangle is simplified with the aid of the graph tn Fig 3 ’ In this graph the radiation angie in degrees is given on the left, and th, ' >gle-hop distance for the effective layer height along ..le bottom. Table i shows the optimum propagation distance for various radiation angles. The data for this table was read from the graph of Fig 3, based on an assumed F-iayer height of 131 miles From Table 1. if the radiation angle from a given transmitiing antenna is concentrated at 30®. the first and succeeding hops m radio propagation will span about 650 miles each With a usable rr.aximum limit of five hops under the best of conditions, one can project that the greatest distance for optimum communications for a 30° wave angle is five times 650 miles, or 3250 miles For effective communications over greater distances, it would be necessary to lower the radiation angle at the transmitter antenna site As will be discussed shortly, this can be done only by increasing the height of the hori zontal transmitting antenna. Although the discussion in the preceding para graphs has been m terms of a transmitting antenna, the same principles apply when the antenna is used for reception. A high antenna will receive low-angle signals m''re effectively than will a low antenna. The point of these several paragraphs may be summarized briefly; The vertical angle of radiation is the key factor in determining effective communications distances beyond line of sight. Raa'Stion Ootfm/fT. Angte.Propagation Degrees Distance. KtHes 2 2250 4 2100 8 1650 10 1500 15 1200 20 10C3 30 650 40 450 Scientists and engineers recognize that modes other tnan signal hopping account (or the propagation of radio waves over thousanas of miles However, studies of actual radio propagation in which the writer has participated have displayed signals with as many as 5 hops. 50 the hopping mode is one distinct possibility.^ Whatever the propagation mode, there is unanimous agreement that the .most effective cotrunumcations at HF most often accompany the lowest radiation angle. Horizontal Antennas A simple antenna that is commonly used for HF communications is the horizontal half-wave dipole. The dipole IS a straight length of wire (or tubing) into which radio-frequency energy is fed at the center. Because of Its simplicity, the dipole may be easily subjected to theoretical performance analyses Further^he results of proper cnaiyses are borne out in practice. For these reasons, the half-wave dipole becomes a convenient performance standard against which other antenna systems can be compared. The dipole antenna, when viewed from one end. radiates an equal amount of power in all directions. Because the earth acts as a reflector for HF radio waves, the directive properties of any antenna are modified considerably by the eanh underneath it If a dipole antenna is placed horizontally above the earth, most of the energy radiated downward from the dipole is reflected upward The reflected waves combine with the direct waves (those radiated at angles above the horizontal) in var'ous ways, depending on the height of the antenna, the frequency, and the electrical character istics of the ground under and around the antenna. At some vertical angles above the horizon, the direct ana reflected waves may be exactly in phase —that is. the maximum signal or field strengths of both waves are reached at the same instant at some distant point. In this 'From TheARRL Antenna Book. 14th edition. Chapter 1, Fig 12 ^Hr backscatier studies by Raytheon Company under contract with Rome Air Development Center. Griftiss AFB. NY A pan of this study was done at Raytheon's South Dartmouth, Mass, field site. Jan-Jun. 1960. 3 w lat modes ropagation However. 1 the writer as many as jossibility.* jnanimous tions at HF angle. ed for HF lipole. The into which Secause of bjected to he results For these :onvement r antenna Tna, when U of power r HF radio tenna are ath it. If a the earth, the dipole nbine with above the i height of character- tntenna. . the direct B—that is. waves are )int. In this er 1. Fig 12. der contract . NY A part Dartmouth, Table 2—Electrical Heights For Amateur Bands below 30 MHz F,Q 4-El.vat<on-ptan« pattern for a a height of wavelength (solid line) and m free space (brotien line). Fig 5-tlevation-ptane pattern for a f a height of 1 wavelength (solid line) and in free space (broken tine). case the resultant field strength is equal to the sum of the two components. At other vertical angles the two waves may be completely out of phase at some distant point-that IS, the fields are maximum at the same instant but the phase directions are opposite The resultant field strength in this case -s the d'Herence between the two At still other angles the resultant field will have intermediate values Thus, the effect of the around is to increase the intensity of radiation at some vertical angles and to decrease it at others The elevation angses at which the maxima and minima occur depend primarily on the antenna height above ground (The electrical characteristics of the ground have some slight 6tt6Ct.) If the earth is considered to be a perfect reflector, straiahttorward trigonometric calculations can be made 10 determine the relative amount of radiation intensity at any vertical angle for any dipole height. Graphs from such calculations may be plotted as circular or polar diaqrams. called radiation patterns Fig 4 shows the vertical radiation pattern for a dipole antenna positioned one-half wavelength above the ground, viewed from one end and Fig 5 for a height of one wavelength The radiation from the d.pole if m free space is shown by the broken lines, and appear as semi-circles. !n the plots of Figs 4 and 5. the radiation angle frecfi/ency 18 MHz 35 35 ftper pny$<*' 0 06 wavefength 0 12 0 25 0 36 0 50 064 0 75 0 89 1 00 70 feet physical fwgKt 0 13 wav«i*ngth 025 0 50 0 72 1 00 1 29 1 49 1 77 1 99 above the horizon is represented in the same fasf.ion that angles are measured on a protractor. The concentric circles are calibrated to represent ratios of field stiengths, referenced to the strength represented by the outer circle. The circles are calibrated m decibels. Diminishing strengths are plotted toward the center. Antenna heights are usually discussed m terms of wavelengths The reason for this is that the length of a radio wave 'S inversely proportional to its frequency. Therefore a fixed physical height will represent different e ’ectrical heights at different radio frequencies For example, a height of 70 feet represents at a frequency of 14 MHz But the same 70- oo etg represents only Vz wavelength for a frequency of 7 MHz. For physical antenna heights of 35 and 70 feet, Table 2 shows the electrical heights m wavelengths for all the amateur bands below 30 MHz . e The lobes and nulls of the pattern cf Figs 4 and 5 Illustrate what was described earlier, that the ettect o the earth beneath the antenna is to increase the intensity of radiation at some vertical angles and ^ at others At a height of Vz wavelength (Fig 4 . the radiated energy is strongest at a radiation angle of 3 . an angle wmch was determined earl.er to provide a maximum ettective communications ^ ^ 3250 miles under the conditions assumed. The pattern of Fig 4 represents the radiation from a dipole for 14 MHz at a height of 35 feet As the horizontal antenna is raised to even greater heights adoitional lobes are formed, and those move closer to the horizon But yet the amplitude of the existing lobes is not ^'m-nished. As may be seen from Fig 5. for an antenna height o 1 wavelength, the energy in the lower lobes 's at 15®. And Table 1 indicates that the optimum propagation distance per hop for 15® is ^ Under the very same conditions as befor , P oropagation. one may see that the greatest distance for optimum communication now is 5 x 12^ or ^^00 mijs^ The pattern of Fig 5 represents a 14-MHz ip height of 70 feet. Thus, for the conditions ^ssumedjhe optimum communications distance has been extended from 3250 miles to 6000 miles, merely by raising the shion entric field Dy the libels, nter. ms of ih of a jency. tterent s. For length height 7 MHz. Table all the and 5 Hect of itensity ease it 4). the of 30®. ovide a if about pattern 14 MHz t a [he compass direct»ofts. as a solid une The brot^en ime m F*g 6 shcK»$ the pattern o? a halt-wavelength dipole, for comparison Fig 7 shows the elevation plane or vertical- profile pattern This pattern is that seen from the ends of the elements, with the anterma m free space The soitci line again represents the Yagi. and the broken hr>e the dipole, th^ ■■ perfect circle ” which was ment«x>ed earlier Performance of most other Yag»-type arrays with three or four elements will no* be significantly different from the patterns shown here Another often-used type of becm antenna is the quad array Typically, a quad is constructed with two or more wire elements m tho form of a square or a diamofKJ. The conducting wires are usuafly supported by X-shaped frames of wood or fiberglass material For the same number o* elements and soacinq. the pedormance of a quad beam is generally Similar to that of a Yagi beam The vertical patterns of Figs 4 and 5 were calculated by assuming the earth is a perfect refiector an unrea'istic Situation Actual earth does not reflect ail of the radio- frequency energy striking it, some absorption fakes place Over real earth, therefore, the patterns wiH be slightly different, depencing upon the electrical con ductivity and Qieiectnc constant of the soil, and upon the radio frequency Computer programs are available to take these factors mto account, and reliable calculations of patterns over real earth may oe made > agi patterns over real eanh are shown in Figs 8 through f4. These patterns were calculated with an Apple He personal computer ^ “Average ” soil conoitions were used for these plots, that is. a conductivity of 5 nillisiemens per meter and a dielectric constant of 15 ^ These patterns compare the performance of Yagi arrays at heights of 35 and 70 feet In Figs 6 through 12, the broken line is the plot for a 35-toof height, and the solid line for 70 feet. For 24 9 and 28 MHo Figs 13 and 14. it is helpful to present the 35- and 70-foot patterns m separate graphs, for clarity. Otherwise the multiple lobes become indis tinguishable commefcialiy available so*iAare prog'am ANNIE, was used to calculate all oattems presentee in tnis paper ‘Such soil conditions may be considered typical for the central pan of tne United States such as tne Oriio and Mississippi river val'evs «c 1 Fig 8—Vertical-profile pattern of a ;-MHz Yagi beam over average earth at a height of 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line). / \\ -V- V • A, i ! J. Fig 9—Vertical-profile pattern of a lO.f-MHa Yagi beam at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line). \ ''V >■ X. Fig 10—VeflicaJ-profiic pattern of a 14-MHz Yagi beam at 70 feet (solid tine) and a! 35 feet (broken line). Fig 11—Vertical-profile pattern of an 18.1-MHz Yagi beam at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line). Fig 12—Vertical-profile pattern of a 21-MHz Yagi beam at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line). j Jo Oeam earn ine), am t same conditicxis ^ The radiation angle of the toi^est lobe tor a hcv zomai antenna above the ground may be determined mathematically e 0 25 where ^ • the wave angle or radiation angle h - the antenna height above ground m waveengfhs (see Tade 2i In Short, higher the horizontal antenna the lower 1$ the lowest tooe ot the pattern Therefore the higher an hF .menn. can £* placed me -annec „ .,11 prpv.de effective communications because ot the resu iinc w radiation angle This .s true tor any honzcntai antenna Electrical Characteristics ot MF Antennas As mentioned previously, a oipoie antenna w,,en Viewed from ore end cl me conductor, raoiates amount of powe'm all directions The plotted ^ad.at.on pattern is a perfect crde If the dicoie is vertical, m.s circle represents the azimuth coverage, with an equal amount of power radiated m every compass For point-to-point communications. novi.ever. it is be ficial to concentrate the radiated energy mto a beam which IS aimed toward a single distant point. An analogy can be made by comparing the light emanating from a bare electric lamp to that from an automcPile ^^^d ig t For Illuminating a distant point, the headlight is far more 0ff0CtlV6 Antennas designed to concentrate the radiated energy mto a beam are called beam antennas For a fixed amount of transmitter power fed to the tratismiumg antenna, beam antennas provide increased signa strength at a o-stant receiver In radio communications, the use of a beam antenna is also beneficial during reception, because the antenna pattern for transmission IS the same as for reception A beam antenna helps to reiect signals from unwanted directions, and m effect boosts the strength of signals received from the desired direction ^ ^ The increase in signal or field strength which a beam antenna offers is frequently referenced to a dipole antenna by a term called gam Gam is common y expressed m oecibels One type of beam antenna is a Yagi named after one of its Japanese inventors. Ditterenf varieties of Yaoi antennas exist, each having somewhat diHerent characteristics. Many antennas erected for television reception are a form of multi element Yagi beam Subsequent discussions m this paper refer to a 3-element Yag* array, one having a driven element, a parasitic director and a parantic reflector The parasitic elements are not led any power directly; instead they are excited through mutual coupling to the driven element, and in turn also radiate power Each parasitic element IS spaced 0.2 wavelength from the driven element, and / X / ‘ / > \ \ 2'Ct U-M- •vTu>. y.\ vv (<V _ L I ! X / 4 -•I N-\. 'v.N' \ t w lN.V \V/ -x>' K-X so i I -90 Fig 7-Computer-calculated elevation-plane or vertical- profile pattern of a horizontal Yagi for a comparison dipole, broken line, ere those seen from the ends of the elements with the antennas in free space the theoretical gam of this array, determined through computer analysis, is 7 2 dB over a dipole. This rneans that fcr the same transmitter power, the nrmerthat DOwer of the Yagi m its favored direction is 5.2 times S?the diDOle in the same direction. The theoretical front^ to-back ratio of the Yag. antenna is ’2 dB. power radiated in its forward direction is 157 <‘mes lha fad.ated m the opposite direction Values for a P^^t'cal antenna of this type are quite dose to ^a'' Compute'calculated radiation % horizontal Yag. array are presented in Figs 6 and 7^ Fig 6 shows the azimuth plane, the response in various F Tabit 3 —Comparison of Vagi B^ams at Heights of 35 and 70 Feet Fig 13 —At A. vertical-profile pattern Of a 24 9-MHz Vagi beam al 35 feel, and at B. 70 feet. ^ ao X, ,,>c \ lA) A '0. 0.' i ■ Fig 14—Al A, vertical-profile pattern of a 28-MHz Vagi beam at 3S feet, and at B, 70 feet. Fig 8 shows the vertical profile for 7-MHz Yagi beams. For a height of 35 feet, the energy is maximum at a vertical angle of 34® above the horizon At a height of 70 feet, maximum radiation occurs at an angle of 24®. ( At 35 Feet-) £ ev angm ot ms» radtsbon (•^At 70 Feet-) £ e» enge of mat radition Pvfform^ca d'-Yenence 5* 70 34 degrees 24 degrees 5 7 drcibels to 1 29 18 57 14 0 24 14 56 18 1 20 11 5 4 21 0 13 9 52 24 9 15 e 4 9 28 0 14 7 4 6 This IS 10® lower than for the same antenna at 35 feet In addition, ir tne 2- to i0-degree elevation range those angles that ait necessary tor communicating over thousands cf miles, the performance of the low Yagi beam is nominally 5 6 dB below that of the high Yagi At a wive angle of 5 0®. the response of the Yagi at 70 feel IS superior by 5.7 dB S milar data can be obtained from Figs 9 through 14 for the amateur frequencies from 10 i througn 20 MHz. The differences m perlormance for the amateur bands from 7 to 28 MHz are summarized m Table 3 As Table 3 indicates, a Yagi antenna at 70 feet provides far greater radiation at low angles for all frequencies than the same antenna at 35 feet. This translates to greater communications effectiveness at long distances, and is especially true for the lower frequencies At a 5® wave angle, the differences m field strengths range from 4 6 to 5 7 dB This means that tne power at a distant receiving antenna for most propa gation conditions will be from 2 9 to 3 7 times stronger from a Yagi antenna at 70 feet, compared to the same Yagi at 35 feet Heights greater than 70 feet will produce even higher power ratios In summary, a high Yagi antenna provides ajpenor performance over a low Yagi, ail other factors being equal. Depending on the level of noise and interference, the performance differences related to height are often enough to mean the difference between making distant radio contact with fairly reliable signals, and being unable to make contact at all. Very High and Ultra High Frequencies Commonly used amateur frequencies higher than those discussed earlier are the very high frequency portion of the spectrum, abbreviated VHF. and the ultra high frequencies, or UHF The VHF range covers 3C to 300 MHz and the UHF range from 300 to 3000 MHz. In an earlier section it was mentioned that HF antennas must be large to be effective. To some degree, however, those considerations are not unique to that frequency range They apply in general to VHF and UHF as well. A difference at VHF and UHF is that antennas may be physically small in order to realize optimum electrical lengths. However, a disadvantage of physically smalt antennas is that they present less surface area to passing radio waves, and are therefore less effective m picking up incoming sigr^ais This effect is terrried picKup efficiency Pickup efficiency is reciprocative, it applies, to transmitted signals as well as to received signals To obtain higher pickup efficiency and therefore greater communications effectiveness, many antenna ele.me.nts are required at VHF and UHF The elements are usually installed on multiple booms Single, vertical radiators, even at elevated heights, are ineffective for distances beyond a few miles at these frequency ranges This is true because of tow pickup efficiency and because of tie orr iidireciional characteristic of the radiator Stacked vertical radiators are sometimes used to obtain gam witfi omnidirectionat cove'age Although ionospheric propagation does sometim.es occur at the lower eno of the VHF range, propagation at too MHz and above is almost always over a iine-of- sight path Under usual conditions, signals at these frequencies encounter very little refraction in air There fore It behooves a person using these frequencies to place his antenna as high as possible, so it can "see" farther Certainly the antenna must be above sur rounding objer’s. such as dense foliage and man-made structures Such objects absorb radio-frequency energy in this portion of the spectrum, and therefore tend to block the signal from propagating Objects such as hills, steel structures and many commercial or industrial buildings will block VHF signals to an even greater degree, creating "shadows" behind them At VHF and UHF, the lowest lobes for Yagi arrays at 35 and 70 feet are only a few degrees above the horizontal. However, tor Ime-of-sight communications, the radiation angle should be zeto. if possible, unless one wishes to commumcale with airplanes or objects in outer space Even more desirable are negative angles from high locations, so the antenna can "took down on" the terrain At VHF and UHF the radiation angles for 35-foot heights are twice those occurring for the 70-foot heights Therefore at VHF it is also beneficial to place the antenna as high as possible, and in the clear from surrounding objects Amateur Radio operators wishing to contact other amateurs at great distances use a hme-worn but true expression. "For the best results, put your antenna as high as you possibly can " Many amateurs in various parts of the world put their big antennas atop 1 2lv)-foot towers, anc enjoy communications with amateurs in foreign countries when neighboring amateurs with much lower antennas cannot even hear the foreign signals. Conclusion The preceding information has dealt with antenna height and communications effectiveness It has been shown that tor ail amateur frequencies, high horizontal antennas will outperform tow antennas Information has been developed to show a consistent power gam of the higher antennas over low ones, that is. at 70 feet and 35 feet The 70-fooi height was chosen only for the purpose of illustration, and is not intended to be construed as the optimum height for antennas Heights above 100 feet will give significantly better performance than at 70 feet. It IS reasonable to assume that if an amateur operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, he will obtain transmitting equipment with a corresponding increase in power output to compensate for the toss of antenna effectiveness For example, he might increase his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1 5 kilowatts to compensate for a three-fold toss in antenna effectiveness because of height limitations. It should be realized that this increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities for his stronger signal to overload nearby television and radio receivers, creating interference for viewers and listeners. There is one further consideration concerning amateur antenna height with regard to television and radio interference. In essence, the sole source of radiated RF energy from an Amateur Radio station is its antenna Raising that antenna to an increased height, far above the level of exrtmg antennas for television reception, will reduce the possibility of interference to television reception from funoamenial overload AMATEUR RADIO EMERGENCY SE SPONSORED BY TICK AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE AVC7ST 1917 • CJlLirOUU rill Hilllon-«cr« Stanlfl^u# lonftl for««t Flr«, by lightning. 5.000 flrtflshttri ur«4 - 1 kllltO - If and 24 outbuilding* d€*troy*d - 90**mor d*cl*r*d * 21-county OMr^oncy. Aaatour* ••nn*d V.S. For**t Sorvlc* K«4id9uart*rp. it fonora. and uarlouo JTlald location*. 44 ha**^u**d th«lr oun radio a^ulp- • *:it to a**l*t th* 7,500 ^opla who had to *9racuat€ thair hon«a. M«alth and walfar* ataaas** u*r« **nt for th* 115 *aacu*** In th* A*d Cro** *h*lt*rc. A*at*ur radio h*lp*d coordl- nat* food, clothing and *h*lt«r wh*n th*r w*r*n*t r.«*dad for prlorltr flrt actl*ltl** lonim 1SI7 - Hus eihosioi Pa*pa*. T*»a*. butan* *»plo- alon klliad thr** and Injurad thlrty-**v*n. Kao* proaldad co**un lea lion* for fod Cro** po*t* at Paapa. Chlldr***. A*arlllo and flchlta Fall* Into th* dl*aat*r ar*a. DICIIEEt 1987 - AUAIEAS. HISS* ISSIPPl, TimSSII lOKfACOS S***r* thund«f*tor»a od tor nado*. Kith 200 HPH wind . klll*d ala p*opl*. Injured 15 > and left 1.500 hoael***. Anataur radio oparatora aent 775 ualfar* Kaaaagaa and aaalatcd fir* atatlon*. tha Rad Croaa and th* D*part*ant of Ereroancy Kan- apeaant• HAT H8I - CAL, TAM CAIS OVfRTURIH Pakerafleld. California - Five railroad tank cara overturnad and b*$ati laaklns a volatile toxic aubatanc*. Tha High tchool and a hoapital war* avacuatad. Ha* radio oparatora wara called for aaalgnaanta to varloua coaeunica- tlon poata with the fire and pol ice dapart*anta. JOLT 1968 - lOrA liAUf COLLIEE Altoona. Icwe - Two fralcht Iralna collided. Two killed. Cara containing denatured alcohol overturned, nreal*.r> pceelMllty of largo otplcelon. 1,500 to nr o » r ^ 1 i i. r *' r \ ^ I* - f • • rd 1 ‘^r ^Ith th* Polk County ***rs*ncy director and th* co«**nd po*t, ATCOST I9fl - oucoi fOtiST fill Crant* Pa**. Or*gon - The K*lk*r Hountalfi fir* r**ult*d In €*tabllfhln9 a R*d Cro** avacua- tlon cant*r. at H*rlln. Haaa llnk*d th* c*nt*r. Pad Croaa dir ector and tha Joaaphln* County fa^rgtncy coordinator. TKonty haaa donated 144 hour* of i*r- vic*. loruia ifii - aljliaha iouaso Tuacalooaa. Al*b*aa — R tor nado d**troy*d tK*lv« hoa*« and daaagad ICO othara. All utlli- tlaa failed. Red Croee eaked for aaateur radio aeelatance with food aervlce and ehelter tea**. Coaeunlcatlon* ware e*tabll*h- *d b*tw**n coaaand be*** and tha center of th* dl*a*t*r ar*a. Htiiaga* war* **nt relating to aadicln*. food. ah*lt*r. atatua of elctlaa and r*latlv*a and da*- aga eurv*y*. lOVMJn 1988 - TROPICAL STORH IIITH Gulf Coaat of Florida - Store overturned a tractor-trailer rig carrying ••thyl broalde gaa. Collier County ha«a Kade radio contact with -Cha*tr*c- for tha fire chief. Cha«tr*c la a *pac- ial eaargancy canter ••tabllehad by tha Chemical Tranaportar* A**- ociatlon. Th* haai* uaed **auto- patch" to allow the chl*f to epaak directly to Ch**trac off- Iclala. (Tha nearaat phone to tha accident acane w*a three alia* away.I The accident ecattered 32 1.500 pound cyllndera of tha dangttoua gaa. A leak regulred area evacuation. The hace eat up radio contact between tha e*ei - gency cparatlona canter and the achool evacuation center, eatab- llihlng another autopatch link. lOVEEEER 1988 - RICH. PLASTICS FIRE Canaaa©, Ml :higan - r’lra In a plaatlca cariufaclurIng plant. Purned Jabolc prevented Identifi cation. 600 local raaidanta w#r# evacuated. The radio aeataure or<**^atad et tha fire hall, cen tral dlepatch and the dleaeter rno? <11 n,* 11 rn crntoi . dapartaanta. th* Aad Cro** and th* f*Iv*tlon Aray u*r* provided radio cowaunlcatIon* by the ha*a. 40 flra fighters and two aaateur radio oparatora w*re treated for toxic fuaa* and aaok*. Th* caateure contacted a fal low haa« who 1* a research chaa- fat for I>ow Chaaical Corporation. In Midland, who waa able to iden tify th* chaalcala *nd glv* ad vice about/'eepondIng. lAICI J9I9 - OUCQ.^ IL1Z2AI0 LaCrande. Oregon - A **ro- vlalbility bllrzard. with 00 KPfl Kind*« stranded aotorlat*. Haas provided co«aunlcat ion* for the anergancy aanageaent oflic*# the Salvation Ar*y. the eaargancy op eration* center, the church evac uation alt* and the *earch-and- raacue teas* manning the road clocura*. SPI1I6 1919 * IllbU-IllllSOU rLOOl Fargo. Forth Oakota to Moor head, Minn«*ota - Alvar created 2f-fe*t abov* flood stag* (th*lr worst flood of thl* century). The aaateur radio operator* par ticipated 1ft •'Skywam**, for the Katlonal V*ather Service, aannlng the eaergency operation* center, the dleaater aervlcca groupie the evacuation center, the Aray Corpe of Engineer*. Red Croe* and the county emergency coordlnetore along the flood route. The ham* aleo monitored leaky dlkae and helped coordinate eand- bagging coaaunlcatlone for the Aray Corpe of Engineer*. Thirty haac participated In the three- day activity. JURE 1989 - LOOISIARA TORIADO Grooae Tett, Loulelana - A violent ternado deetreyad ona- thlrd of tha town, killing two and injuring many. The haae using th# Roeedale repeater founded the alara. notifying the State Patrol. Red Croaa and other diaaeter groupe. The Baton Rouge weather bureau had not detected the tori.ado prior to the han radio alert. within 30 alnutee th# hare were tranealtllng eoergency and wellare reesagee for Uielr ccr.- Kurilly. Ae the ♦ornedo roved to- 1 1989-CALIFORllIfi QUAK— ------ , .» t.lh to th* r.iorto Mean- at-oxt »y#'«ltna'a th* daoa^o aaaaaaaant rar«»t* third larflaal *»rth^u*k* tha v.athar *’***^**“' <„» |7t| - firjl* IsUl^S c*nt 1 r^aht a I C«lta« - -........... c~-.„»..... „„.,.mTr... i,,. ,v„ ; „..r;...... ..... tirn.:?; •uffcr«d Hortha*****"" Orajon - •.000 **^'^ *''*'*Wn. »" «•“ hir^T TaVa^Vand •JIO olhor dao- ,era -So—It- tlra. Tb* Ih<» -*<»' ija. *•• -obll* ***' rora.t ST.f ’"‘'''t «} iif^naa. i" 4 «,r rocal-4 -icr dM*9*. oa.rlo.dad Vr L rlU^t on th. .»fnt of -r. h-aU«*. _____*Ka ▼ Oth«r fir#® l*' O.C.# r po in ___ __....-Alnlna ho##!###ere. th. -rr othT ary in th. o <... to rape, t on W,llo«a-Whlt.an Katlonal el*ll "’‘•®7*In.rVhT «lth JaU rora.t same. Mr. ..aaS*r. . .tat. til4* «..d ...t.«r radio Tl'To'c^arT I't V-n Point and --./■h th* baaa caopa In tha Mx a my lootar _________ r.onrtlnq 3 000 of tha. ra.alnln? h—alaaa two .orth. aftar tha <«7*: Tha quaka «a. cantarad at r.aeh tha baaa c.ap. .ha fix. «Vr not^ra'^^rMn, ^“"t •ndVd” \ ro"-** tha' "'•V'olnMd.nt.ny. tha fo^r-t for thl. ha—MPPUad I^rhl^olM'm^.Mnay T.r.lca »»7 -Spoot t^foroatlon. Pra.ldant or- ,^„th. Tha qu.ka l..ta4 rp7ln;;- -raHar/at tha S.500- ^.rad iT^rl ^^ta'Sant. Cruz ara. aaP- foot laaol in tha ^‘lar ♦».«<»»•<> *h* r.- «ttd«.. da—ood toid««.« Thla ropaaUr. ‘“P***^* . ordar. d.clolona. So— ^|o,ad road, and to., of po—r at.t. ceoarasa. -• -**"t !n^«d.d In tha para- ! ),V », 1 aph«na. • tf"T radio Mr. -1th ^*7. Juap taa-a. Into tha dla.a- «,tIon- [*“^1 leua yaar tha haaa h p chut 3 „,„bUah addition- s*nla Cruz lio-pltal •* 1989 - HURRICANE HUGO “.r.-rin ,,ft a path of d.ath and iy patch., for cr—an and h*H<=0P7«-* atructlon in tha Ea.tarn Carlb- ialandar. to thalr lo»ad ^,4,^ contact dlractly bean. Puarto Rico and South Caro- stato.. Ita« radio ho.pltala •■•J*'!!, *^liu, ?ina. Ho-a. and nalqhborho^. «„iy imK a-aUabl.. ^,^4 „l.y th. war. turnad Into rubbla. Tha . South Ctfflll#* Ha*. •!•<» r.port.d «* ' hao. a.ra.d qoaarna.nt and -al- daatn.ctlon. 135 hPH broken water and ••“'[rch-and- Jiri aoenclea. Including CIMI . r‘;**':;/nne. and tr... down so*, -re tu- Oefanaa. th. Ped Cro.a and tha ^l^^ collapalnc. The haaa r.acue t.a- to rational Guard. baaan praparlno for the atcr* on tl*. 1 •* collap.ed ^l , B.fora th* .tor- hit. baqln ^ ^ ^ lath. orqanlzlns •*«- th. 3T0 ***t.or radl j.n^4 radio net* -ere *.t up on JO -tj,, for th* neat 10 day*, to doty with the C ■ atar. and oparatad contlnuou.ly w.rlou. a—rijency opara- the elsht-day period. fir th. nett nine day.. Official » J*//. j,, th. Depart-ent ybe O.kl.nd/San port., w.lfr. ^,4 Croi.. national -ather $.r- oth.r inforaatlen waa handled for ^ hoapltal*. national Guard ,oaern.ent and non-|0-^-nt r.- .t.tlon. H#f « ii*h#n pow#r #nd phonr# wtr# .la.lon. located In Va.hlnqton. 1-h.n p O.C. 4^ With #o## •t#tion# end enten Haaa In Trlnldtd, ‘7‘*' „„ 4e,iroyed. and with th. hl9h Do.lrlca. St. Vincent and ot i drain on local haaa. .boot location, aad* volunteer haa operator* caae to • tata.ld* ha*, who pa-a.d - ao,.th Carolina fro. naarbr .tate. h..lth-and-«alf»r. •'••»S** «® „,i,i. Jo addition to h.a*r r.latlva. and frland. in tha W.S. ^y traffic, th. haa. The aaateor radio “Hurricane ecaaunlcatlona coordlna- vatch- net obtal.iad .eteorolcal- dl.trlbotlon of food, cal report* froo he*, in t a P* ^,j,r. clotl'lng and other eaaen- of th. atora. Including on. ha. whoa* b^ft anaaoaeter waa >. eadl g ----------------- IJO MPH wind*. fh*** 7P7*' prep.tcd by v^JGh. ir- 1®' ware pe—d regular y »® Mraatloo conden.ed fro. the .ore lonal Hurricane Center. In Hla , . ^ roporte which aprcf riorlda. , •' hVr In the -ruHlc Service- The Aeerlcen Fedlo Halay " ■aceilne, which 1* League ^ 7' p„M,,hed by the Aaerlcan Pedlc WlAW. in kewlnctcn, provided r-ranUl--treating heae a.------------ Part of the 1-80 Bay Brldg. al.o collapatd. Twenty-two «J land*. Urge.t bulld«ng« :A0 allllon doll.ra In daa *’*Flfty haaa aaal.ted the aat.y aheltera operating in S"" wlth .any coalng froa a. aa Oregon artd Ht*ada tocl #co f#r #M#r h#lp. / nn Univors:il Mjnurjcn.f > Uu L ) , I » FREE STANDING ALUMINUM TOWER Nc ne-d ♦or ,,,'c o-- LlGHTVVf . FOR TV* FAd-f {/v\', fc a: . ^ - .. .. ‘ 'f'W:rjuV w;r»v^ r CHOOSING THE PROPER TOWER s:;: u’. r.::%■*■ 1 M- ft. f*t •••r to .hoto^or alto aataaM y«« IntmU to ooo. .■tir L-n" •"In 10 fnet •♦ctlonn to fi»o tooor d«ol«ao4 for fl»o aaoaro foot aad ▼«»* ^ yw do act oicood 6 ft. Tbo tablo oa aogo i otll toll yoo oboot yo»r lo-or. It to rocoa.»ooo 4>««« toa of tooor olth OBT aa «aa eotfIpirotloa.example. •. i 11 Top 14 Top II USfr # » ;* i: If I' 1'\ \ 80^. roof mounted guyed tower. i. r ^» ' T 'ffi Model 5-50 Tower 18 Tap 18Str WAJUlAjm: l-nlv.riol Tow.ro or. vorroni.d nolnot dof.ctiv. ooterlol or workjion.hlp ond •” •ubjoet to rrpolr or to -lot.rlol r»PiOc«ont ool. tl falluro rooulto froo th».» foctor. wit 1 1 froB purchBf* tv user. Thl* w«rr« It? Joe* not eit#od to «dt of our produett which boon oubjoctod to • l.uoo, O.ti.ct. oecld.nt, loorop-r In.t.lUtloo or .pplleotl-n. oor .holl U o.tood to unit, which hov. boon r.polr.d or oubotontlollr oUtrod outold. of our f.ctor.. Thlo worrootr 1* In lUu of •ll orhor womntlto oapr^sood or Implied. a ^ 818 r JANUARY 1990 UNIVERSAL TO^^ERS prices and models (amenna size in square feet) 2 sq.ft. 3 sq.ft, 4 sq.ft. 5 sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. 7 sq.ft, 9 S Q • f ^ • 12 sq.ft. 15 S C) eft#* 16 sq.ft. 21 sq.ft. 23 sq.ft. 35 sq.ft. W 30ft.4-30 $335 9-30 $451 12-30 $593 21-30 $704 23-30 $932 35-30 $1050 40ft.4-40 $562 7-40 $706 9-40 $787 12-40 $932 15-40 $1042 21-40 $1157 23-40 $1385 50ft.4-50 $792 5-50 $900 . 7-50 $1013 9-50 $1126 15-50 $1496 16-50 $1614 • 60ft.4-60 $1127 6-60 $1382, 7-60 $1471 9-60 $1577 • 70ft.3-70 $1469 4-70 $1805, 6-70 $1838 7-70 $1922 80ft.3-80 $1920 4-80 $2293 PHnCES SUBJ ECT TOCHIANGE witHOUT NCITICE 90ft.2-90 $2375 NOTt: Above pncti do not include accessories. Accessories Rotor Wt. 2# ... R-U $30.27 Wt. 2-1/2# R-14 $45.33 ■hM ^ 3-1/2# R-18 $60.58Mount FIAT RCX)F MOUNTS FOR GUYED TOWERS Bases Wt. - 19# . . . B-14 $ 60.58 Wt. - 25# ... B-18 $ 60.58 Wt. - 45# ... B-22 $106.04 Wt. - 55# ... B-26 $136.33 V'i Wt. - 10# ...RFM-14 $42.32 Flat Roof Mounts Alum. Mast. Wt. Wt. Wt. Wt. 3-1/2# ..1-1/4 o.d.xlOft.- 5- 1/2# ..1-1/2 o.d.xlOft.- 6- 3/4# ..2" o.d. X 8ft. - 13-1/4# 2" o.d. X 16ft. - $30.27 $37.84 $45 41 $90.88 Wt.-wt.-wt.- 25# . RFM 2?.35. 2?# . RFM i# . RFM 18 . $ 66.69 22 . $ 99.96 26 . $133.33 ^ I /1 \ c11 \i%11 1 V \\fFUniversal Manufacturing Co. 43900 Groesbeck Hwy. Mt. Clemens. Ml 48043 (313) 463-2560 FAX (313) 463-2964FREE STANDING ALUMINUM TOWERMODELNO.HEIGHTFT.WIND LOAD SO. FT.WEIGHTLBS.SECTIONS WHICH COMPRISE TOWER (Sir - Straight Tap • Tapar)BASEABC 4 30 30 4.5 25 1.5 38 14 Tap nstr 11 Top 814 9-30 30 9.6 5 5.55 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top 818 12-30 30 12.8 55 72 18Str 18 Tap 14 Top 818 21-30 30 21.15 115 77 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Top 822 23-30 30 23.16 12.99 22Str 22 Tap 18 Top 822 3600 30 345 25.19.112 26 Tap 22 Tap 18 Top 826 440 40 4.5 2 5 15 68 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Tap 11 Top 818 7-40 40 7.4 25 85 lastr 18 Tap 14Str 14 Top 818 940 40 95 65 5.89 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top 822 1240 40 12.8.55 106 22 Tap 18Str 18 Tap 14 Top 822 1640 40 15.10.7.111 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Top 822 2140 40 21.15.11.5 124 26 Tap 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Top 826 2340 40 23.15.5 11.146 26 Tap 22Str 22 Tap 18 Top 826 450 50 35 1.5 97 18Str 18 Tap 14Str 14 Tap 11 Top 818 550 50 45 2 5 1.5 101 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Sir 11 Top 822 7 50 50 7.4.2.5 118 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top 832 950 50 9.65 5.123 22Str 22Tap 18Tap 14Tap 11 Top 822 16^50 60 IS.10.7.158 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Top 826 1650 50 165 105 7.171 2G Sir 26 Tap 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Top 826 4^60 35 1.5 131 22 Tap 18Str 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Tap 11 Top 822 600 60 6.25 .5 153 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Top • 822 ISO 60 7.4.25 165 26T«p 32T*p 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top B269S0609.6 5 4.170 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top B36 370 70 3..5 165 22 6lr 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Tap 11 Top B22 4 70 70 4 5 2 5 15 195 26 Su 26 Tap 22 Tap 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Sir 11 Top B26 6-70 70 6.3.1.200 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Top B26 7-70 70 7.35 1.212 26 Sir 26 Tap 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Tap 11 Top B26 380 80 3 .5 212 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Tap 11 Top B26 480 80 4 .5 24 7 26 Sir 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Top B26 290 90 1.5 259 26 Sir 26 Tap 22 Sir 22 Tap 18 Sir 18 Tap 14 Sir 14 Tap 11 Top B?S WIND LOADING ZONES -a.-, rn 1 UNIVERSAL TOWERS sectional designations Universal Aluminum Tower Sections are desi9nated as IV. 14". 18". 22" and 26" 10 feet in Ien9ih and are an equilateral trian9ular welded truss. They are TYPICAL ASSEMBLY ll\ STRAIGHT SECTION 11” Top $113.66 Wt.-14'P ... 14" Top $143.22 Wt.-31^ ... IS” Top $259.72 Wt*13-^ . Wt.-29^ . Wt-34-'. Wt-47<^ . . 14 ” Taper $126.00 . 18 ” Taper $226.00 . 22” Taper $337.00 . 26” Taper $453.00 ... ll”Stra4?ht$112.00 Wt,-13<P ... 14 ” Straight $126.00 Wt-29-» ... 18 ” Straight $226.00 Wt.-34«^... 22” Straight $337.00 Wt.-47''^... 26” Straight $463.00 BASES approximately cu. yd. concrete ^^'/l cu. yd. concrete — (Hole 3* x 3 x 4 deep) 2 cu. yd. concrete — Hole (4* x 4 x 4 deep) 4 cu. yd. concrete — Hole (4*%' x 4-% x 5 deep) me D id B-22 and B 26 should be bolted to the bottom tower section of your particular configuration. This will insure correct equilateral spread of the base While concrete is setting up. base can be leveled by using a carpenters ev^ on the upright of the section used to keep the base spread. Concrete ou allowed set up for 3 to 4 days before erecting remainder of tower. NOTE: All ha»m* should be put in omount of concref recommended^ B14 B-18 B 22 B 26 The B-18 caution UO not void your warranty ,11 nP$lTROY Aluminum Tower sections should NEVER be placed directly in concrete" Corrosive effects O aluminum tower sections. Use only Universal Bases as show, ToiA^r thrioss.bility of damage possibility of freezing ano splitting. Universal bases allow the tower to dram properly and obviate t Use of an Universal Tower without the proper base VOIDS ALL WARRANTIES. L r heavy duty H.D. 40 Ft H.D. 50 Ft H.D. 60 Ft. H.D. 70 Ft. 4 sq.ft H.D. 80 Ft. H.D. 90 Ft. H.D. 100 Ft. 4-90 ♦2710 sq. ft 8-70 ♦2034 8*80 ♦2603 4-100 * ^3630 8-90 ♦3198 ':^b~ iC o•o XRY1990 TOWERS t in square ftat) sq.ft T1 1. ft. L-50 1724 9-60 ♦ 1808 9-80 ♦2716 11-80 ♦3085 11-90 ♦3656 12-70 ♦2519 16-60 ♦2178 12-80 ♦3090 16-80 ♦3317 17-70 ♦2749 21-60 ♦2294 21-70 ♦2864 sq.ft 35-40 tieia pBicts SUBJECT TO chance without notice NOTE: Above pnet* do not include occ«sori«. _ 30 ” I tapered section ACCESSORIES 30 straight section ♦670.00 'j (I i 1 i * 3 - 30 BASE $212.57 Flat Roof Mounts RFM - 30 - $186.52 M For Guyed Towers BEARING $90.70 l-5/8"SC 4-B $116.52 2-3/l6 ”SC 4-B 1 • a m r «\• • a •o m 1 - f •# •• with 6 cu. yd. concrete. The B-30 base should be bolted to the bottom Tower section of your particular configuration — fin UTl 3. *t6r3. J.section •This will insure correct equilateral spread of base. While concrete is setting up, base can be leveled by using a carp enters level on the upright section used to keep the base spread. Allow concrete 3 to 4 days to set up before erecting balance of tewer. NOTE: AM bmn thould b» put in aiwunt *1 cwntf f f TOP PLATE Flange Bearing Mount- $2124 This plate to be WELDED to Top Section, (as shown below) SECTION ¥¥MiCM COM^WiSI TO^« (Str Tap Tapa«)^Top 30 Tap. 26 Tap. 22 Tap. l8Top 30 Tap. 26 Tap. 22 Tap. l8Tap. lit Top 30 Tap. 26 Tap. 22 Tap. l8Tap. II4 Tip, llTop 30 Tap. 26 Str. 26 T^. 22Tap 18 Tap lliTop 30 Str. 30 Tap. 26 Tap. 22Tap. 18 Tap, ll*Top 30 Tap. 26 Tap. 22 Tap. l8Str. 18 Tap. m Tap. llTop •asc B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 30 Str. 30 Tap, 26 Tap. 22Tap 18 Str, 13 Tap. lUTop 30 Str, 30 Tap. 26 Str. 26Tap 22 Tap. 18 Tap, lliTop 30 Str. 30 Str, 30 Tap, 26Tap 22 Tap. 18 Tap. lliTop 30 Tap. 22 Tap. 30 Str. 22 Tap. 26 Str. 26 Tap. 22Str 18 Tap. II4 Tap, UTop 30 Tap.26 Tap. 22Str. 18 Tap. Hi Tap. llTop 30 Str. 30 Tap. 26 Str. 26Tap. 22 Str, 22 Tap. 18 Tap, lliTop 30 Str. 30 Str. 30 Tap. 26Tap. 22 Tap, 18 Str. 18 Tap. lliTop 30 Str. 26 Tap. 30 Tap. 22 Tap. 30 Str. 22 Str. 30 Str. 26 Tap, 30 Str. 26 Tap. 30 Str. 26 Tap. 30 Str. 22 Tap. 26 Str. 18 Tap. 30 Tap. 22 Tap. 30 Str. 22 Str. 30 Str. 22 Tap. 30 Str. 22 Str. 30 Tap. 26Str. 18 Tap UiTop 26 Tap. Hi Str. 26 Str. 18 Tap. 30 Tap. 22 Tap. 30 Str. 18 Tap. Hi Tap. 30 Str. 22 Tap. Hi Str. 22s tr. HiTap. UTop 26Tap. HiStr. HiTop 26s tr. l8Tap. HiTop 30Tap HiStr. UTop 30 Tap 18 Tap Hi Top B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 a-30 B-30 B-30 B-30 UNIVERSAL TOWERS ,/ i'.-.. ..•• .'i ■■ ' , •■ J- \-| '■ «:•---- - K v,5...| | , ... i ■'. 'J' 0 vr ^ *.'■ - K'V-‘- ^ ■' k“'»- ^■»^<rVvv'Ite.'v: t -f -1•e.^ I V-*- *•♦ United States Court of AppealsFOR THE EIGHTH CIKCUIT Sylvia Pentel, Appellant, V. City of Mendota Heights, Appellee. No. 93-1026 ★ * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Submitted: October 13, 1993 Filed: January 18, 1993 Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to its zoning ordinance, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, denied Sylvia Pentel, an amateur radio operator, permission to erect a 68-foot radio antenna tower in her yard. Pentel then sued the city, claiming that the zoning ordinance was preempted by a Federal Communications Commission ruling known as PRB-1, which requires the city reasonably to accommodate her amateur communications. The District Court granted summary judgment to the city, and Pentel appeals. Because we conclude that the city did not reasonably accommodate Pentel when it limited her to the continuing use of her ineffective 56.5-foot antenna, we reverse and grant summary judgment to Pentel. ii \ii » [i^»] [•n«T« »c«] •1 K=l« ■ •] ni .li { II. We review de novo the district court's grant of surinary judgment. United States ex rel. Glass v. Medtronic. In^, 957 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir. 1992). Because the parties agree that no material facts are in dispute, summary judgment is appropriate in favor of the party that is entitled as a matter of law to a judgment in its favor. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) ; Celotex Corp. y^. Catrett. 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 326 (1986). Cases centering on zoning regulations governing amateur radio antenna towers present a unigue tension among the various parties interests. On the one hand, a local municipality, through the exercise of its traditional police powers, may regulate the height and placement of radio antenna towers erected in residential districts. A municipality's motivations for such regulation include the possibilities that an antenna may bloc)c the line of sight of pedestrians or drivers; constitute a prominent eyesore that also may interfere with a scenic view; fall on nearby residences; or decrease property values. Amateur radio operators, on the other hand, plainly have an interest in maintaining successful amateur conanunications and in sustaining a strong network of radio amateurs. The federal government's interests are aligned witli those of the amateurs, for amateur radio volunteers afford reliable emergency preparedness, national security, and disaster relief communications. Because there is a direct correlation between an amateur's antenna height and her ability successfully to transmit and receive radio signals, federal interests are furthered when local regulations do not unduly restrict the erection of amateur radio antennas. The FCC was attempting to referee the tension between these interests when it issued PRB-1, in which it attempted "to strike a balance between the federal interest in promoting amateur -4- r I I. Pentel is sn amateur radio operator who uses radio communications to serve the public inte-est. After she was licensed by the FCC in December 1988 to operate an amateur radio and a station from her home, she installed on her roof a vertical radio antenna that reaches a height from the ground of 56-5 eet over the next two years, Pentel was unable to establish rel radio communications with other amateurs across the United States, and she was able to establish only one international contac . Pentel concluded that her existing antenna thus was not adequate for domestic, much less international, communications. Accordingly, Pentel began preparing to install a more sophisticated antenna. The replacement was to be a retractable steel tower that measured 30 feet when lowered and 68 feet when fully extended. This tower, which Pentel planned to have installed professionally in accordance with its manufacturer s specifications, was to have mounted on its top two directional aluminura antennas.' Pentel was unaware when she installed her original antenna that she was violating the city's toning ordinance, which limits all structures, including radio antennas, to a height of twenty- ipentel's proposed antenna would be >"°f® existing"set-up'fOf two «asons Firs^ ^ -ttical antenna dissipates signals in '?itec’:ions, un^^^ signals, thus directional antenna would concentrate and collect signa, itho-TPasina her ability to transmit and receive in a speciri dLection! second, an^antenna^s effectiveness ^^^aller K PPntel's existinq antenna is blocked by trees. Her taller Replacement antenna, when extended, would be at or nearby trees, thus improving her signal transmission and re p -2- L five fcet.^ While preparing to install her new antenna, Pentel became aware of the city's restrictions, and in January 1991 she filed for a variance pursuant to Mendota Heights, Minn*, Zoning Ordinance § 5.5 (1981). The city evaluated PenteJ's application through a planning report prepared by a city staff member, and at a planning commission meeting and two city council meetings. The city then sent Pentel a letter in February 1991 telling her that her application had been denied. The letter did not state any factual findings, reasons for the denial, or what Pentel could do to gain the city's approval. In an attempt to offer Pentel a reasonable accommodation, as required by In re Federal Preemption Qf g.t^te and Local Regulations Pertaining to Amateur_Padjo—FasilJL^ieS/ 10 ^ F.C.C.2d 952, 50 Fed. Reg. 38,813 (1985) (codified at 47 C.F.R. § 97.15(e) (1992)) [hereinafter PRB-1], the city council granted Pentel a special-use permit that allowed her to continue us-ng her existing antenna, which she had erected in contravention of the city's zoning ordinance. Pentel then filed suit against the city in the District Court, claiming that the city's ordinance was preempted by PRB-1 in that the city had not reasonably accommodated her. Agreeing that there were no disputed issues of material fact, Pentel and the city both moved for summary judgment. The District Court g^janted summary judgment in favor of the city on all claims.^ Pentel appeals. ^The parties failed to furnish this Court a copy of § 8B.4(1) of the Mendota Heights zoning ordinance, and the city was unable to furnisi a copy when contacted by this Court. We do not pursue the issue, however, because the parties agree, and the District Court found, that this section limits Pentel's radio antenna tower to a maximum height of 25 feet. ^In addition to her preemption challenge, Pentel raised various other constitutional challenges that are not renewed here. -3- r operations and the legitimate interests of local governments in regulating local zoning matters.” PRB-1 S 22. After weighing local, federal, and amateur interests, the FCC issued a ruling that has a limited preemptive effect on local regulations. See PRB-1 ^ 24. The federal courts that have addressed this ruling have upheld its preemptive effect. See, e.o.. Evans v. Board of County Comm"rs. 994 F.2d 755, 760-61 (10th Cir. 1993); Themes v. City of Lakeside Park. Kv. . 779 F.2d 1187, 1188-89 (6th Cir. 1986) (per curiam). f Courts applying PRB-1 have discerned two means by which PRB-1 may preempt a local ordinance. First, the local regulation may bu preempted on its face. The city's zoning ordinance does not conflict on its face with PRB-1 because it neither bans nor imposes an unvarying height restriction on amateur radio antennas. See Evans v. Board of Countv Comm'rs. 752 F. Supp. 973, 976-77 (D. Colo. 1990); Bulchis v. City of Edmonds. 671 F. Supp. 1270, 1274 (W.D. Wash. 1987).^ Second, PRB-1 also preempts a zoning ordinance that a city has not applied in a manner that reasonably accommodates amateur communications. See Evans. 994 F.2d at 761; MacMillan v. City of Rocky River. 748 F. Supp. 1241, 1248 (N.D. Ohio 1990). The FCC refused to specify a height below which local governments could not regulate, and instead declared that "local regulations which involve placement, screening, or height of antennas based on health, safety, or aesthetic considerations must be crafted to accommodate reasonably amateur communications, and to represent the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose." PRB-1 5 25. ‘Pentel's argument that the city's ordinance is void for vagueness is without merit. See* Kolender v. Lawson. 461 U.S. 352, 357-58 (1983); Williams v, city of Columbia. 906 F.2d 994, 998 (4th Cir. 1990). -5- Initially, we must discuss the extent to which this language requires nunicipalities to yield to amateur interests. Although some courts have evaluated whether the municipality properly balanced its interests against the federal government's interests in promoting amateur communications, see Williams v. City of Columbia, 906 F.2d 994, 998 (4th Cir. 1990); MacMillan. 748 F. Supp. at 1248, we read PRB-1 as requiring municipalities to do more—PRB-1 specifically requires the city to accommodate reasonably amateur communications.^ See Evans. 994 F.2d at 762-63. This distinction is important, because a standard that requires a city to accommodate amateur communications in a reasonable fashion is certainly more rigorous than one that simply requires a city to balance local and federal interests when deciding whether to permit a radio antenna. Application of this reasonable accommodation standard, howevei, does not require the city to allow the amateur to erect any antenna she desires. Instead, it requires only that the city ”consider[] the application, ma[k]e factual findings, and attempt() to negotiate a satisfactory compromise with the applicant.” Howard y....CitY Ol, Burlingame, 937 F.2d 1376, 1380 (9th Cir. 1991); see. Evans, 994 F.2d at 762 (stating that the county was willing to permit a crank-up tower, a shorter tower, or a tower located elsewhere); Wj,].liams, 906 F.2d at 997 (stating that the city suggested a limitation on the hours the antenna could be extended, and noting that the amateur could apply for a shorter antenna). Under this approach, a local regulation that impairs amateur radio communications is preempted as applied if the city has not crafted it "to accommodate reasonably amateur communications” while using 5;^t various places in PRB-1, the FCC states that, in considering the issue before it, it weighed federal and amateur operator interests against those of local governments. After balancing these interests, the standard that the FCC concluded was appropriate was that a local government must reasonably accommodate amateur radio communications. See PRB-1 22, 24. -6- r ( ..tho nininun practicable regulation Cneceeeary) to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose." PRB-1 ? 25. The city informed Pentel that her application had been denied via a bare-bones letter that did not list any bases for the denial. Because the city council failed to make any factual ^ unir.. near RnH t cun Club City of Huqa. 388 N.W.2d 739, (Minn. 1986, (holding in a case reviewing a city council's denial of a special-use permit that a cryptic listing of reasons for the denial did not constitute factual findings); VanT,andschoot v. M.ndota Heights. 336 N.W.2d 503, 509 n.7 (Minn. 1983) (stating that variances and special-usc permits are treated identica y on judicial review), we need not consider whether, if it had, such findings would be afforded preclusive effect here, see Uniyersiti T„nn. V. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788, 797-99 (1986). Although the city failed to make any factual findings, the planning report and hearings suggest four potential justifications tor the city's denial of Pentel's variance application. We now turn to those justifications. First, the city had no reason to fear that the antenna would interfere with other residents television and radio reception: the city's planning report states that Pentel was prohibited by the FCC from causing, and that she could lose her license if she failed to correct, such a problem. second, the city expressed concerns about the tower's safety in light of the strong winds that frequent the Mississippi River valley. Pentel presented to the city the manufacturer's ‘Mendota Heights, Minn., Zoning Ordinance exist.‘'°“Twi coh=lhsoryTa"n^^^^^^^ Th" cUy maj ours. -7- r specifications, which rate the tower secure in cighty-nilc-per-hour winds. Although the city generally relics on such specifications produced by manufacturers, it declined to do so in this case. In addition, the tower was retractable, and the city could require Pentel to retract it whenever bad weather threatened. Moreover, the city in 1987 allowed a nearby amateur radio operator to erect a similar tower, and that one was closer to the operator's property line than Pentel's was to be. The record before us thus does not establish a factual basis for the city's safety concerns. Third, the city claims that it believed it reasonably accommodated Pentel because she already successfully engages in amateur communications. Pentel submitted with her application a letter of commendation for her public services. The city's planning report concluded that this letter demonstrated the adequacy of Pentel's current antenna. Pentel has pointed out, however, that the public services cited in the letter were not related to the amateur communications in which she engaged from her home. In fact, the letter makes it clear that the amateur communications for which Pentel was to be commended were conducted at the Air National Guard base in Minneapolis. In addition, the mayor and some members of the city council indicated in their depositions that they concluded from Pentel's statements at the hearings that she already was communicating effectively, albeit not to the extent she desired. The hearings' minutes indicate that Pentel stated that she was able to reach only sporadically various places in the United States, and that her current antenna did not allow reliable long-range transmissions. When prompted, her attorney reluctantly attempted to quantify the communications: he characterized Pentel's current chances for making contact at 40 percent, and estimated those chances at 80 to 90 percent with the improved tower. The context of these remarks and Pentel's other statements indicate that these chances of success referred to domestic communications only. -8- J r This quantification of Pontol's ability to conmunicato was thoroughly nischaractorizod by the nayor at his deposition, where he stated that Pentel was able to communicate worldwide 60 to 70 percent of the tine, but that she wanted to have reliable worldwide communications 100 percent of the time. One city councilmember understood Pentel's statements regarding her transmission success, but others demonstrated a fuzzy understanding, at best, of Pentel's situation. Although what constitutes "successful” amateur communications is difficult to quantify, the evidence in the record does not justify a finding by the city that Pentel's old antenna enabled her "successfully" to engage in amateur communications, and the city was unreasonable if it so found. On the record before us, the city's first three concerns lack factual support. The city's last reason for denying Pentel's application, that the antenna tower would be unsightly, rests on subjective considerations and is difficult for a reviewing court to evaluate. This reason is undercut, however, by the city's willingness to allow Pentel to keep her present roof-mounted antenna, which reaches a height only slightly below that of her proposed antenna tower and by the city's allowance of a similar antenna tower nearby. We acknowledge the possible aesthetic difference between an antenna tower and a roof-mounted antenna, but there is no indication in the record that the city attempted to find any compromise that would have accommodated Pentel's amateur communications. The city's decision to grant a variance that allows Pentel to continue using a wholly inadequate antenna does not constitute an accommodation in any practical sense. In addition, because the city did not reasonably accommodate Pentel, it obviously did not use the least restrictive means available to meet its legitimate zoning purposes. We therefore hold that the city's zoning ordinance as applied in this case is preempted by PRB-1. -9- L III. we exhort the parties to work together to arrive at a satisfactory solution to this controversy. PRB-1 requires the city reasonably to accommodate Pentel's needs as an amateur radio operator; what is allowed is the ••minimum practicable regulation [necessary] to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose." PRB-1 5 25. The District Court's grant of summary judgment to the city is reversed, and the case is remanded to the District Court for the entry of summary judgment in favor of Pentel. Our decision does not mean that the city necessarily must grant Pentel's application as it now stands, but it does mean that the city must make a reasonable accommodation for her interests. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -10- TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm. DATE: April 14, 1994 SUBJECT: #1915 George Applebaum, 4109 Highwood Road - Variances ■ IMblic Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Setback variances for principal stnicture A. Street Required = 35 ’ Existing = 3.5 ’ Proposed = 10’ Variance = 25 ’ or 71% B. Side yard Required = 10’ Existing = 3 ’ Proposed Variance = Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. A. 0-75’ setback area = 7,296 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 2,083 s.f. or 28.5% Proposed = 1,153 s.f. or 15.8% B. 75-250’ setback area = 9,250 s.f. Allowed = 2,312.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,917 s.f. or 31.5% Proposed = 3,804 s.f. or 41.12% Variance = 1,491.5 s.f. or 16.1% Hardcover increase = 887 s.f. or 9.5% Section 10 56, Subd. 16(C-2) - Proposed addition will encroach required 30’ setback from top of bluff. Applicant also proposes the alteration of the bluff area by providing a walkout from low’er level basement. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Total lot area Allowed = 2,482 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 2,767 s.f. or 16.7% Variance = 281 s.f. or 1.7% = 16,540 s.f. Zoning File #1915 April 14, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms E - Existing Survey F - Topographic Surveys - Location of Bluff Gl-3 - Sections H - Existing Hardcover Inventory 0-75 ’ I - Proposed Hardcover Inventoiy 0-75 ’ K - 0-75 ’ Site Plan L - Existing Hardcover Inventory 75-250 ’ M - Site Plan of Existing Hardcover 75-250 ’ N - 75-250 ’ Hardcover Inventory O - Site Plan of Proposed Hardcover 75-250 ’ PI-2 - Floor Plans. Q - Elevations R - Section of Structure S - Proposed Site Plan Description of Request The application involves the removal of the existing detached garage at 18.9 ’xl6.8 ’ and installing an attached garage approximately 24’x27’ to be relocated at least 10 ’ from the edge of the right-of-way. Applicant proposes the enclosure of the existing lakeside deck and a second story addition. The improvements also include a lakeside deck that will be installed right to the top of the defined bluff. The existing single story residence is limited to two bedrooms. The upper level expansion will provide much needed bedroom area for applicant’s older children. Note the garage will be at two levels providing additional storage area at lower level. Applicant also proposes installation of expanded basement beneath lakeside addition. In a recent site inspection, the applicant advised that there will be no overhang structure above lower level doors of garage. Elevations of garage show an overhead structure. It is not clear from the information submitted whether existing foundation will be replaced and a new one installed. Applicant should advise if current foundation has been evaluated to determine if it can sustain second story. Applicant proposes a reduction of some \2.1% hardcover improvements within the 0-75 ’ and an increase of 9.5% within the 75-250 ’ setback area. The improvements result in an excess ot structural coverage for the site at 1.7%.. mm nHi¥« reii^J ^MUME TmiKTITB snminwE Zoning File #1915 April I4, 1994 Page 4 1. Need to reduce structural coverage so that 15% standard is met. 2. 4. What structures are to be reduced — garage, lakeside deck, decks at shoreline attached to boathouse structure? (Note the decks adjacent to boathouse would not have been included in your lot coverage determinations.) 3. Do members have any problems with the second story addition? What other areas of hardcover can be removed in both setback areas to provide a reasonable percentage for increase in the 75-250 with additional reductions in the 0-75 . 5. Others pre.sented by Planning Commission. I 4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^ V 0*A V_c iA' ^ I ^ rjTv r»riri I I %Jt CMVi/lTU rr.uAA-r nccTrc r AivnftL.k. i/I I X i r~»V"AiNAAA X ^w'ViL V'V' VV V TLIfii\ rraii • W CrirL.cA lu ^%/V VV f^LfTTDT^TLAkJk' Vi t if2993J0 COOi i<01 TIJ:. AT.- < C‘/C ■ ■ ■■■.................. - V«wV A i// Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ‘ CC\^_________ Attach legal description to applicatioji if not included on required survey. Date pTt^ijy^ Acquired________________________________________(month/'year) I (do) {(^notj also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: yi residential ___other (specify)______________________ Zoning District: V_ ^ '£5_____________________________________________ APPLIC^T Name CL vLcvil-e. l\ x-^ (^ \~c Phone (home) Phone(work) AAT--CL-\^> Siti-VVVC._______ Address: *AVO‘^\ c-ts City:_^^2iSib2i^ OWTSTR (if different than applicant) Name Phone(home) Phone (work) Address:Cirv':Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQLTIST Estimated Comtruction Cost $ yOOxOPC:)— Describe request in detail: \Vo..y-v^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback: ^ Front Side Hardcover Rear Other (specify) Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore H.ARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: i rcts.-v\c*c s>__________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) cx ^ \cv V SsV REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must he submitted bv the applicationj1xadjinejdaMn_^^^^ for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2^ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form Cenified Property' Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County' Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Cenificate of Sur ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/^” x 11" for reproduction. Topographic surv'ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/j ' .x 11 tor reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital stams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNAITJRE The applicant hereby agrees to provide ali information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payi^dditional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses ii^ci information supplied isArue a^coi Applicant’s SienaturS^ n review of this application, and certifies that the to the best of his/her knowledge. Date S./ n OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property^ by City staffs consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purp( Owner’s Signatu: es of/ifivestigjj|non and verification of this request. Dale '-^1 n ("xf Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise die Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 r ’• # V L GOVT LOT 5 t ■ RUM DATE 03/01/94BATCH 005-. •j. MWP *®®"* ? OHNER NAME ; T^t.TAXPAYERNAMC/ADDR•> f"! - -..- .r -/v' " ‘ ■■, »•—^ *• *1* ^^.i^ PROR ADOR ' 0»tCR NAMEV taxpayer JO 07-117-2S 44 0011 04091 HIGHHOOO RD F L JOHNSON A D L FOSS FREDERIC JOHNSON 4091 HIGHHOOO RO MOUND m 55344 •V NAI«/A00R 'is,-.*- Iw ’ * '• PROP ADDR * (MCR NAME TAXPAYER < NAME/ADDR . •- 1 * • n L rV. 36 07-117-25 44 0014 04105 HIGHHOOO RD CHARLES E DA MART HILLIAM G BRICKLEY 4105 HIGHHOOO HOUND MN 55364 5S 07-117-25 44 0030 04140 HIGKHOOD RO J 0 CUSACK ACM GRACE C GRACE A J CUSACK 4140 HIGHHOOO RO HOUND MN 55364 . ;r"<pnop AOOR • • ^ 'OHNER NAME Vt>; TAXPAYER • NAME/AOOR I « < 5B 07-117-25 44 0035 RD04108 HIGHHOI DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER V 4106 HIGHHOOO ROAD * HOUND m 55564 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0>t4ERS LIST38 07-117-23 44 001204099 HIGmOOO RD OLLIS L NELSON ETAL ALONZO B SERAN III 4099 HIGHHOOO RD HOUND m 5536458 07-117-25 44 001504109 HIGHHOOO RO GEORGE H APPLEBAUM GEORGE APPLEBAUM 4109 HIGHHOOO RD M0UT8) MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0031 04132 HIGHHOOD RO SCOTT 6 A CATHERINE ANDERSON SCOTT G A CATHERIf4E ANDERSON 4132 HIGHHOOO ROAD HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-25 44 0034 04104 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOO RD HOUND MN 55364 :0»MiR NAME (■ V - > TAXPAYER ^ TOTAL BATCH . NAME/AOOR ‘•r«2.';Vr '■ V ' • / .V V • i ^ ‘ • f * U.. . ^*4. i *ti‘ ^ % ' • 005 00012 *,REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1558 07-117-23 44 001304101 HIGHHOOO RD EVA THEOBALD EVA A THEOBALD 4101 HIGHl^tOOO ROAD HOUND MN 5536438 07-117-23 44 001804149 HIGHHOOO RO LARRY H KARKELA LARRY H KARKELA 4149 HIGHHOOD RD MOUTK) M4 55364 / Vi/ y • • 9.9At> • * 38 07-117-23 44 0032 04116 HICIDCOO RD BRUCE J MOLUreY PHIL OTTO 4140 HIGHHOOD RD MOUt40 ^t4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0084 04125 HIGHHOOD RO JOHN H A ROBERTA J HEfO^ICH JOHN H A ROBERTA J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOO RD ORONO MN 55364 .'4 • •RUN DATE 03iaJl/»4 ^ .** *t ' • •BATCH 005 'r X'* ^ >». • •’ < • ;*r .••■ ■• ■• .* 1 ‘/I. •*: V • ‘■•.‘t**! 'V 4v5%i,>jv .J-. \:..V;i;.V. .,■ ■ V 1*^ 1-* • • , * * •* vi* • *'• * • ^ 1 ?:< 'f- Vii "■■?•;■.•!■■ ■ ■' HEr*«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 14 • V* I ^ '•^ ■ '•••• .•••-•;• rv'. ■•' .'W’- .• ■ •'..a*:•■ ■ ■■■..■ V• ' .): '‘V’ • .' . ' . / i* • . %» -.‘1^ •■‘• i.. ’ ••-r ;.•■ *. f-- ' %V-.*8i « .. ^ / ., > . * / iI : >•» . • s a/ ‘•*- • .J.V;* •=te ». •« c.. ‘-v . I' I . » '^2 1 • . V ? .‘^:V‘v*5>V -sniL-' ^ 3D9BH- X x.r. ; .-1 »*. »•'' I . -4 t . 4' *‘ t . . . * 4, P /. ^>rvV ■■*: .r .■ : •"> r •..-; .Vs, •. 4\f, I ,11 Ji • V>. .* ? .>. ./■. 'V- .ij-,' •■■ > V.'5 REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS* • .'P t' Jj^ _-1^'^ • ‘y OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMEFa OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST , ,V »*i ! ^ ’ • 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE OF HY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF./ .MDATI iiiS M UOOi I . *A1L ‘ ^ 'r ••••.V'MM ; •• • •. • “/ > ■ ■.• ••-: -IV ••*•• • #1 J- Adjacent Property Ooners’ Acknooledgement Form Ipnn; nait;«i)l lP""‘ D , (we, understand that in executing Z Su^diSuwcramTarmt: of *at the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Courcil approval. I (we)[print address)[print nameis)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located also referred to as Land Use Apphcat.on No.------------■ I (we, undersund that in e.xecuttng this "f;;;j:tTonf™ Z '^City .bat *0 proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approsal. l.L Property Owner _ / 7-7 9" Date -------------—------—■ ^ ' DateProperty Owner App;[carn,'’;:as“’'ubm:™f-lirtUfB:ilg"i^^^^ to the scheduled meeting date. iMLnlUl CiNllf I UT ML UN UNUUM WAS >*ML^AMiU « A UWLT >lAtC OF mimmooIa. KUHTH SUHVEYINC INC. 4002 JCFFensoH sTnccT N.e. COLUMOIA HtICHTS MINNESOTA SS42li' Oa TC MINNESOTA Suui>:iTHATlON NO. l<otO L.o»t -s '^'7 i ^ 8» > Vv ' <3 H.VvCC>C>t» > ^ \Aa K\»^eP I sA Co o UT Yj ^ V'C'-i • SCALE •' OaiHON M0NUM£NTC*® Y MCARINOS ARC ON AN AtSUMCO OATUU \ 1 \ 1No \ I 1 e. 1 1 1 1 1 ^ 1 1 V ^ \W (* • iW TOTfiL P.01 H £ certificate of survey Kuntn sunvCYiMG inc . IllCtlillf Ci H Ilf I iMAl IlliS ON Htl'Olll «At Pllt* A|(LU AM A OwkT f llli: )ilATC Of MINni^UlA. CiHlif I IMAl iMiS »tiMVn;r‘W^.ON Htl UT MC on UNIHJI-MJ O iMLCT >uriHvl)t0^^^inrTTYA MIRNCSOTA Sl^:iTRATlON NO. L<i»T1i S ') 8> H IC»H.WOOt» > nr M • ^002 JCfFCnSON STH£eT N.£. COLUMUIA Hi:iGHT:i MlNNCSOtA 99421^ date $CALC •»-«> • o*i(«ON monumcnt C**;^ »eAHIN0( AHC OMAN ASSUMCO DATUM COMTUVfitjUlfaCS,' ^ iVJT^ILVfAU. IV -x- «r 6)<' ^=* S>OT T5' ■:. t I y ^V|J\ ' V.'.'I; v> Sii'i FEB tOS-I?^ 14:24 FRCHl l.urtt. Surreying 4721270 P.03 G-l CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR fr.?>A4'>K— kurth surveying inc . that Thi:l kONViY.KkAH^N NiPUNr MAS I'MiY'AHiU l»T Mi ON ONOCN MY OiNLCY ^UNiNVI>IUN ANQlJMimiH A OOkr ia'^suw e#-UMUkH SOf iHilTATC OF MtHNiYUTA. 4002 J£FF£RS0N STR££T N.C. COlUMUIA H£lGHTS MINN£S0TA 99421 0AT£ ME.. P^KOf'e.K-Vv SCALE r* 0«IHON monument HEAAINOS ARC ON AN ASSUMCfi OATWy ClJ « G-LCE n/. 4f K\riZ/KV FEB-0j>“1934 14^27 FRQII l;urth Sc.‘rveMinq 4721270 P.05 FOB ^ ittinKur ccNfifr ihaf this >uNviY,Hi.A MT MC OH UHOCN MY Oi ^HtTOTT r M^jiMk<Aniu >U»'iMVl>IUW AHO THATjLdtrAOULT l«¥ilOHV<«UiN Vu*: >>AT0^ MINNi^WfA. MINNESOTA REGly^AVoM NO. tCoM^ B ua ^«_\<^Tc >P’ ^o£v.c>";i 'SCZ.-Clj j .• ? ' •- i MW. pi^OPGT^'fS' CCbJC^UG.!^ SURVEYING INC. 4002 JCFTCRSON STHEET N.E. COLUMUIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA SS42I o.rr 2./3/qP L-^KIC.^ fed WA^UU. B o/kor W)■cx>5»e. \CX=:. 'G-V^GN. FEB«-03-1994 14:26 FROH Kurtl> Suri-eying 4721270 P.04 (S--^ FOR SEQR-6G- A.-FP\-I1BKUM CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY l»tCNiHy ClNflf r THAF T||I» Ht»*ONr was ^HtrAtltO if liC QN MHUH HI OiHtCr kUl^iNVI^lUH A^^CiatVaM A OWLT ^H*44*4UllUUA!i? UWUtH TMt tWof T Jt STATt Of MINhiiurA. •: KURTH SURVEYING INC. ^002 JEFFERSON STREET N.C. coLUMUiA heights Minnesota osisi kl2*?A«*»rA» MINNESOTA RTE^I^AtiOW NO. < faT DATE SCALE I l/ 3 / *54 iV •Vt: 5i-.AwCK.TlCi?' P p IC>T"«£.T^T^ 'LwIM-CE. 0*|HON MONUMENT • EAHINOS ANCON AN ASSUMED DATUM O ► E-L tVATTl OVL / P'S \CGw E-l-G-V J»^-<-06-1994 12‘04 FRCJ-1 Kurth Surveying 4721270 P.06 Pr , 8i Ga RAG c — S.F • • 0 c. D riveway ^ X J--------- _ X ^ - 4 D. Sidewalk X __ »I;*..■> jm Ml'w«; <i,\ •LTl'? E. r^Ailo/6 lir ECK F.Landscape areas underlain BY plastic SHEETING X ^ X _ S f F» •« . S«F* ^ S.F.CS) „ S.F ® _ S.F.® ^ S.P*@ 01 W^o>c. O ther X X X X S.F.— %'\ox\0- no _ S • F • 7.*? 3‘>o_ .r.' r•n 'C\'hO 1 ^ SIF* _S.P.® _ S.P**^S) Total Hardcover in Zone f. T oe>3 S.F :i Total Property A rea in Zone ;Vp - .p. S3 « %i,cP,-S B -V-U^^ X 100 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE 5cT3ack zcne: (circle one)(o-^ 75-250' ^ ------------gj44S7i-N6 Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 5G0-I000' A ' Hnn<??X =• 1-fen S.F. LENGTH • • WIDTH X t • S.F. X s • • S.F. •y • S.F. ., . m y • S.F.• 3. C. AD AfZ^V • S.F. Dot a V y s=t S.F. y • • • S.F. D.. • • ^ r nPWAt V m S.F. y S.F. % y ■ST\S . StFi E.^ATIO/ ]ecx &\. S.F. * C 1 AMnC/“APP V m S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN O V V s • S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING V •• • S.F. ••• •. S.F. • /- H tuco * V S.F.• U • *• ■ • . ••i• Total H ardcover Total Property A rea • IN Zone* - IN Zone S.F. •S.F.T B X 100 \S % \1Z^ ■ ■ -A wi IW-i08-19'?J 13=38 rWJl l.urtli St-M-v'ey*"9 OV?L\<S> 4721270 P.04 H CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR <jEOR5:-iC-_ iittttiHf Cinrif 1 IIIAI >oMvnrv‘M(nON HifOiir «ia » hiiirAUku tti mi: tin VMOtjMU OiHkCT ^urtMvixgMjtoTlHT i am a Owct ANV^liii: iiAlC gi MiHtii^gtA MINNESOTA Si£ii)STRATlON NO. V_C>T -b ^"7 S Q> ^ I Ca H.WOC>l? j VA.\KiK\G.TOKiU,^, VVavuAePIM CoouTVj ^ fce.v.3/«/7f KURTM surveying INC. v> 400J JCFFCnSON STIICCT N.C. COLUMUIA llElfiMTS MINNESOTA 03421^^ t-L-Ua hs^ SCALE • O«IN0N MONUMCNTC**'^ MEAfllNOS ANC ON AN ASSUMCO datum r jHfJ-06-19’?4 12 ‘02 FPOfl KijrtK Su«'yeym9 TO 4721270 F.04 •nt CIIY OF ORONQ 612-473-73S?004 L HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSH SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing H ardcover in Zone ON WORKSHEET,. <fO^ ^75-250^ I- 250-500' 500-1000 H ouse - X M S> Q s.Fi \ LENGTH WIDTH ' — ■ - S.F. S.F, - X _S.F» S.F. a. Garage \Ce &» c. Driveway X _ $ IFI S.F. 3 S.F, D. Sidewalk .CDve> S.F. S.F. . E. Patio / Deck ^a> ____S.F. F. Landscape AREAS underlain BY . - PLASTIC SHEETING -ere F-s-«LT . Vi A4JUS G. Other ______ X X X X X S.F S.F _ S.F. WM- S.F. S.F. ^ Total H ardcover in Zone zj=)\n S.F Total Property Area in Zone losic • R. S ...[TlK 100 •\ '-•■-r .-i. r i \ /* c. ur 5^UnVt.T ... 1 / Lot “Si ^~J s > ^~C • Os H^WOOtT- j ^ L/iv.V<.G. \^Lv*aKiCLTOKA\<^^ Ho KildeP IM Co o kiT \r OVLV<S» FOR <jE.O\Zi:jC-_ certificate of f URVEY «-sm i I'OHr WAS MHrANtU r I AM A OUWT f Itti: )TaU of Mihiii^WlA. \V' '0 Mlt^NCSOTA SiQ^UTRATlON NO. Lc>Tt> ^ ^ B > H I <a KWOOt^ i ^ KURTH SURVEYING INC. 4002 JCffCnSON StIICCT N.E. CQUUMUIA MIHhCSOlA ddiSli »ia-u«-»>»» <x,Ka hs<j^ >• ^ $CALC r» ..Jsa:— 0»lftON MOMUMENTf'*'^ \ VCARINaS ARC ON AR AtSUMCO DATUM V-Ak-I-C-CL VA.\KiiaG.TOKiU.^, Coovj-\v^ 10-<40 FRCt'1 K'.irth Sufwip'jino| 12' 09/93 12:41 4721270 P.03 the CITY Q|tf ORONO 612-473-7357 cwm » « • hardcover CALCUUTIOH 250.500- 500-1000 setback zo»E: CCRCLE one ) 0-75 >C5:fcC> A.H ouse X — length WIDTH a, Garage c. Driveway p, Sidewalk i: E. gAT.O/lECK ■0 * F.Landscape — AREAS UNOERI-AIN BY ■|; BY < r------------PLASTIC SHEETING X --------- X X •V \ _____________^ G. Other •t; S.F _ SIF • ^ S.F. =fe S.F.|~ITKsil S.F. m ‘ • 1 f S.F. • S.F. <J S.F. S.F. S.F‘ S.F. S.F. $.F. , S • F • S • F F _ S.F ■ Total Hardcover <n Z«ne i; * i»: Total PRoi-ERTY Area in Zon ||- • • i.f, S.F. [3 »B !r* ■.X 100 . 4L\7- j% FOR OR.v<^ OF SURVEY ntCNkMI ClMIlfl IhAl IMU HLFOMr I.AJ «» M UH ilHOip^ O.MtCf >v/fi w»iaiC«,^nm>4T I AM A OwkT •'«V»V'»U>V*^<lOnn\^A«S/f Ttii >Ia 1£ ok MiHhliwJA. SuSsT i ') e> ^ •<aH.WC>C>t> 1 Ho-KiKidP I K\ Co O «aT V. VCu. 2^pkig. n^-TJrO X ^ KURTM surveying INC. 4002 JCFFCHSO n STIteCT N.£. \- COUUMUIA H£lCnri M«NN£S0TA 98421^ ^ OAjg ,Ll±:thl/ V ^ acALt r> _i-o- O"lf«0N MONUMfNTC'*^ meaainos ancon ah A8SUMC0 OATUy v-A- ' c; 0o H tJ V? ^o‘- "A"- 0 5VUJ^G^ /fy' mOVOJCrtS:, ^ 'TO >AAvW^CjOV/^ iCovv.'^rr^ucrv okx n>o )C>9>•Me> NO _______^ 8&n**‘ ToTIM., pCkC'^ ivL,:« \§ riw 1 A. ^ - iXP'#'\\\^e.HU ----- - NAR*:O0-19?4 13*33 FRCUl KurtI* Surveying TO I O • G (5 oeO(F f^PUz ________________' 4721270 P.01 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ■ KURTH SURVCYIUC INC. CiHlir f itiAi Till) ^uNVlTTrvAfi.oii iiLf'Onr WAS i*iiirAHiu 4002 JCFFCHSO n STKCCT H.C. I AM A Otfur riiii: ^iau of MiHhowtA. ClHlir T ItlAl Till) )UNVlTrev4(i. Oil IlLI MI Mi UH MHOip^ OilikCT )ur*iKVDlOy^^JT lYA ) ijuv*-Mrt0nny^ AM 5/1 MINNESOTA Si£ibsiration NO. I<oII'5 Lc .T'S ^“7 ^ ^ ^“C I <a H.W c>c> 1? 1 V\.GVi»>UlP I S.V C oovjt V^ ^ vC?^ O <2? wfci V n.A. \ COLUMUIA H£lChT;i MINNESOTA d042li^ ^ 'TL.Uahsv *' SCALE r.-iSJ-. y,'^ O«U(0N MOHUMCHTC”'^ ' " ' HEASINOS AHC ON AN ASSUMED DATUM SHAJ5GX> /fv^ lUtovcJiCrTL Ai>i>T'TVOKVS 'TO >iA^W>cjOV/GJi BV T='tea.t»0£.<ib. 1C oVC5STQ>JCV\ okx IT-*^ IT_0 loa-^e> NO SS-^"' ToT|k.U e/^A 0 0 - A-* '■» ji-: -ir' , 1.. il f \t;J N| -A"- r -1 r - X •. s^cenxr.'j '4, V ♦biDifcmrr ’'^TH n.EVATICM A'.i-O rtcnifi uhc ^4!s| Ti I - ‘ i hr .•- *. n 'WE'»T ELEVAT/<?N • s [I- I. f / 1^- *r n €^'' ^ I \ i’-U- !l li- f^i k P \\ / -r -St' ^ r • '*^•1 '• A . Ty • *1 / -‘ ‘^1 :■ }■ -jL^Pr 1 ''____r:--T! .' i. .. c-v.- \ • V ? ->‘vH / D 3r • %—*. *. ^^1 ^ W :'*■»■ yT •f-': • -4 ; » ' :■ • V ‘ ; ‘' -'V' I * • t ^;V / w*T / / V-fe , ■; *■ tVt'f ! \ A-\ L—J In \/ 1 <>£' / ‘.f. : A' 'll ^ ^ . *• *. r / J ., » ^ ^Jh ^ .. •*-., '■ • *■• • *,*1 •; ■•■'.*,•' ; * • ? • .**-•;' •■. t •• -*"• *<^ . X . • * . ^ * L * • ■ *' •* * . . .•*- ;. V. -> *■ . *... p}$ -% . •• .-, •'... ‘ O • V X- ■’ ■ I, .<»^ " '. Uj• ♦ * » . f ’, i r \ V' Xy ^.i-.v /*P/• -y'», . .'C ^y . •'/ • I' ^&5‘ U ‘ I) tft’ ^5“ V. t-#*’’ ■:.., ir. \i ■:' } -A \V /«'?!■':■ / • I i : - U' Mj'fv. ri\' ; -ilfv' »'li .*■ ••Vf’v^'-y \\ V- /# /pil •x .'. / •3‘X / ■ 7 X' ^ #X' iX*.' ,rS' / / ryr.- \ ^ .y\-:x M. -4 A' V > I t ■ * [r* ••'»r-• --—• f'-'" . i I "■-/ •'• >'"■' ■‘■: \ •.TT T- i;y To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 14. 1994 #l.Ji6 Irwin and Alex Jacobs. 1700 Shoreline Drive ■ Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing = 6.000 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) Total allowed area for accessory structures in excess ot 9 acres Existing = 10.633 s.f. Proposed = 10,793 s.f. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Addendum per Jensen Homes C - Jacobs' Letter of November 30, 1993 D - Ptoperty Owners ’ List E - Plat Map F - Hardcover Fact Sheet G - Elevations/Floor Plans H - Survey Description of Request A 1- h.. in.tnlled a euard house at approximately 12' x 16 ’ in the southern yard of ~ "" ■ n-'V" '■ area. In the tall of 1993, the Building and Zoning staff was advised of ijrnHTrre ^ 4 5-1 al'IlV cuxiL h-ir <v) V > tn. I« i -c: <v» ^ w •-• • W cm' OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTT' LOCATION Site Address 1700 ShorpTinp Hrivp OronQ^ MN 553ai •'em Ti Urf <k.UI> I U L'c riTT DT— Tu V uil MUCC. A * I IS !ni%x\ 1 _ _ lVh»f volie /\UUrCNN I/UV ^MUI U I LM LU-------- ---------------------- — —^ ^ TvoeofADplicationiobeFiled Conditional Use Permit-Residential Acce$>9ry USiL Propeny Identification Number (P.I.D.) _1011723140014 ------------------------------- — APPLICANT Phone (home) Name .ipneen Honce- <ne. - -lame? N, JensaB- PhO'® (work) 475-054?---- anarp., ^P, eiw,, .(??■;------City Hinnetotika---------^ip_5S2Qi OW'NER (if different than applicant) Name Irwin & Alex Jacobs Address 1700 Shoreline Drive DaieProperty Acquired 1973 Phone (home) 473-0331 ______ Phone (work) -^-^7-1001 City urono___________Zip 55391 (month/yeai) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application X S125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg .*250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ■-------- Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , r x $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant tees) ^ $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation ' $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision^ ” $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to lee schedule) _______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals ______Other - see Fee Schedule % PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______________ Present Use of Property X Residential Other (specify)_ YitVYfc* f v.fr M VV' f - X^ M W ^^A/V Vm/I »rjM>> I w«J _ _ Oni Tnu*- ^»* / .‘^>/<- »/w*/ L,^/ / REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1 Completed Application Form. 2 Describe request in detail. - ■ ------- Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Depanment of Finance. A-603, Goverament Center. 34S-3271). Plat Map. , w .. rCertificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for suiv'cy information. . , 6 Attach legal description to appUcation if not included on required survey. j -------Topographic survey (caisting and proposed contours) if land alterations mvolve changes in elevation (grades). . g Ust of the legal names (include mariul satus) of all persons with an micrcst m the property. This would include narnc(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner<s). 0 Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). lb. ------- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any ouer persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF FOR reproduction (11" X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR AUL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Suff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above infotmation has not been included. Ccrxincation by Clerical Department that Land Use Appliwtion is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:__________ -------------------------------- provide .11 inforn...ioo requiml or requerled by ^ Zo^8 AdminhWior, epees to pey eddi.ion.1 fees (staff WoiLiion and/or unusual expenses incuned in review of this application, and c supplied is true and correct t^e best of his/b« knowledge. Applicant’s signature Pats fudges end .pecs r^s Owner’s signature \ Applicant must hive all submittals Into the C\ti^ff\^25 days before scheduled Commission Mceilofts are held on the thinl Monday of ‘ to attend a scheduled meeung. review meetings of the Planning Commissicn and Council. ‘ “ *PP“^'^“vise the Building & Zoning Officeplease make iirangemeou to have an authorized agent attend In your place and 80V1SC in of this change prior to the meetiag. nr || JErtSEN HOm^JNC. CARLSON CENTER • 601 LAKESMORE PARKWAY SUITE 1225 • MINNETONKA MN 55305 • 612 475 054R • E AK 612 475 2459 City of Orono Request Description 1700 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 We would like to request a conditional use permit to be granted for In/vin and Alex Jacobs in order to accommodate security personnel and security equipment located at the entrance of their property Due to the unique and immediate need for this structure it was started without the approved permit. However, this project was previously discussed with the City of Orono. Irwin L. Jacobs 100 South Fifth Street Suite 2500 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 Telephone: ©12 337-lBOO November 30, 1993 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Building & Zoning Administrator 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 Dear Ms. Mabusth; accordance with your recent conversation with Jim Jensen on mv behalf, I am writing this letter to request your assistance i^ ^ ® building permit for the purpose of constructina a guardhouse on my property at 1700 Shoreline Drive. ^ bacausrp:iurh^a”igs":oi?d"be needed monitored'^bi*'i°fui?M^^®® wiring will be controlled and ILJ:rs > MM n/. .HUM DATE 05/01/M-\ •* /r t. •BATCH 002 HE^t4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMERS LIST■t.r'j PROP AOORf^l'OHNER NAME ' .TAXPAYERVta^%name/aoor 56 10-117-23 11 000100038 AOORESS UNASSIGNEOSUAO H A7HARISUAD H AZHARI1745 FOX STHAYZATA HN 55391mr #-• ■AOOR^ 7 ONNER NAME -VlTAXPAYER 0004s 5^V^NAH£/A0DR * .' * * 36 10-117-23 1200940 BROHN RD Ate JOHNSTON ALEXANDER/CATHERINE JOHNSTON 940 BROI^ RO S HAYZATA HN 55391 > I PROP AOOR r f^ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER TIAME/AOOR ■>:.v 3J . 36 10-117-23 13 0006 01025 HERITAGE LA H J JOHNSON t H L JOHNSON HARK R JOHNSON 1025 HERITAGE LN HAYZATA HN 55391 .. . V'- ■vW'\'V * Vf>^^ PPOP AOOR ^4 ,Olt«R NAHE TAXPAYER - ^ NAHE/AOOR I * '4i T> 36 10-117-23 13 0019 00036 /ODRESS UNASSIGNEO HELEN S HCKNIGHT OAVIO H HINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 60 S 8TH ST HPLS HN 55402 ;.;.PROP AOOR v; VOHNER NAHE . .^TAXPAYER ; ^ty!^NAHE/ADDR i v 36 10-117-23 14 0003 01760 SHORELINE OR DAVID H HINTON DAVID H HINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 6TH ST HPLS HN 55402 PROP AOOR40I«4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 36 10-117-23 14 0008 01050 HILLSTON RO R. P BURNELL ABE BURNELL RODNEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 6201 HPLS HN 55431 • • % J * * • A 38 10-117-23 11 000200038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAMS ST N HUTCHINSON ft4 5535038 10-117-23 12 000501005 HERITAGE LA 0 t A BEAL DAVID J BEAL 1005 HERITAGE LA NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0017 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DAVID M HINTON DAVID H HINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST HPLS HN 55402 38 10-117-23 13 0020 00036 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO OAVIO H NINTON DAVID H NINTON 4422 ID? CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS HN 55402 38 10-117-23 14 0005 01000 HERITAGE LA STEPHEN NHITEHILL STEPHEN NHITEHILL 1000 HERITAGE LA NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 14 0009 01000 HILLSTON RD R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL RODNEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 1201 MPLS HN 55431 9 .REPORT NO. PI435401 % PAGE 6 :• i38 10-117-23 12 000300930 BROWN RD S GARY 0 FRETHEIM ETAL GARY D FRETHEIM 930 BROHN ROAD NAYZATA HN 5539136 10-117-23 13 000701080 HERITAGE LA DAVID M NINTON DAVID M NirfTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS HN 55402 t/ »‘ N %^ f * ' f.>*(Tl .Vii:k •>?>••A.•U 1f . ■ '^'• L’ • ^ ■ •> V ' T{' «•r i • -:lt ■ >'#.1*'If• f ••I .y/'T. •• •.* ^>; 4*; • 38 10-117-23 13 0018 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID H HirrroN DAVID M NINTON 4422 lOS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS HN 55402 V ' I*’* ' J ‘ • f‘ ' • ' • A* J \ • yi ! . v;. 38 10-117-23 14 0002 01780 SHORELINE DR DAVID M NINTON DAVID H NINTON 4422 IDS CerfTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS HN 55402 'i'-i'-s ) i fV ' • » 4 %. '• t\ *•r - ■!. ^ 38 10-117-23 14 0006 01125 HILLSTON RD R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL ROONEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S MPLS HN 55431 38 10-117-23 14 0010 01100 HILLSTON RO R P BURNELL t E E BURNELL ROONEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 1201 MPLS HN 55431 i, • if* y • : \ 4 >a- ^ ': ..CI * • V . V- •i- '• /• ^ r * , %* ■V • '4 ‘ . * 'I •f ^ • V:'-5?U‘ I" / i ; t V, • ■ •* • 1 » A ' * • t ’ aV ; ' •V::V si Rlf4 DATE 05/01/94 •• 1*;»'^feATCH002■,n> ■:■:■■■.* . PROP AOOR ' i' OMCR NAHE'f,- TAXPAYERV»' NAt«/AODR... ;y■ i*:- y^’l ’ PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAMC/ADOR <-7m; ’ K ‘ ‘"k 4./ ‘ PROP ADDR OHNER NAME. —i ’r TAXPAYER 4<^NAHE/A0DR 5S 10-117-23 U 0011 01100 MILLSTON RO R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL RODNEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S MPLS MN 55^313B 10-117-23 14 0014 01700 SHORELINE DR IRHIN L JACOBS ET AL IRNIN L JACOBS 1700 SHORELINE DR NAYZaTA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 42 0001 01190 HERITAGE LA ONEN A PARR ONEN A PARR 1190 HERRITA6E LANE NAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY »#4ERS LIST38 10-117-23 14 001200038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL RODNEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 1201 MPLS MN 5543138 10-117-23 41 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID M MINTON DAVID M NINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS MN 55402 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE -.•.I 4W.r,V.„,, .V./.0 1. i ^ 1 4|» 1 A . .. f:.■ ;'i’/• . . 9 9 A ' • - I • > ‘ 4 • ' • t—’’ ■ ■ ■■'a .r-f :■■ • /* TOTAL BATCH 002 00025 38 10-117-i:3 14 001300038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO IRMIN L JACOBS ETAL IRHIN L JACOBS 100 5TH ST S STE 2500 MPLS W 5540238 10-117-23 41 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO FOXHILL ASSN FOXHILL ASSN 1160 HERITAGE LA HAYZATA MN 55391 ■i I i i* '4» I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF 5: ‘I ii'i »iV'V • X « < 1 1 «• 2 7 CXEm TREK ON tahacer lari HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ' _ _ __ "K SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (^00-1000^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House ' x ---------- LENGTH WIDTH 3SO S.F. /?iO S. F. ■ S7 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. 7^ B. Garage c. D riveway X _ S.F. ■ I5.F, S.F. D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , , PLASTIC SHEETING POOL CouiT ____X So >r 410 *iO so S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. •• . _ S.F. S.F S.F. ZOOO 7^00 S.F. '^'1) G. Other S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in . Zone SOjOSo s.P, [a Wif.feot S.I.. [b1 . • * • 71 Jo, oSo ^ “b" ^00 X 100 “ (• YJL — ^ ^40^43(4 CCiAfO 44ociS( - /75 5^ 4 So^ (P40 z ^ VV3 cc:) tH i VvX ^ xl|r o J 3 •=3 '^r Q uv ~ x = ■? VI% 5: C“ d br .9 ¥ *; •»• i ■ \ A IM ...1 TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm DATE:April 13, 1994 SUBJECT: #1917 Frank and Martha Bennett, 315 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 4(A) (Section 10.20, Subd. 3G(2)1 Applicant seeks conditional use permit for caretaker apartment within residence structure, List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Survey F - Garage Addition - Floor Plan Gl-2 - Septic Inventory Map and Card H - Elevations I - Partial First Floor Plan K - Floor Plan of Apartment L - Original First Floor Plan Application #1613 M - Original Second Floor Plan Application #1613 N - Resolution #2926 File #1613 Description of Request Applicant has filed a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a caretaker apartment above the recent garage addition installed in 1993. Review Exhibits I and J, and the west elevation of strucmre on Exhibit H, apartment will have a separate entry access to the side of the three stall garage. Note there is no way to provide direct access from the second Boor to existing residence without major alterations to roof design. Internal access to the residence is via the ground tloor hallway and closet that eventually leads to the original garage area and eventually to residence. Review Exhibits K, L and M, the City approved a conditional use permit in February of 1991 for the Bennetts for a lower level guest bedroom within the principal structure All standards of the code were satisfied with the original application. The applicants would nt w like to install an apartment for a full ume n^nnv to assist in the care of the six children of the Bennetts. Applicants propose to do away with the guest room and convert it to an office library to offset 1 // Zoning File #1917 April 13, 1994 Pace 2 the addition of another bedroom (total 6 bedroom). Review Exhibits G 1 and 2. the septic system was desiened for at a seven bedroom capa-ity. The total six bedrooms would once again have no impact on the existing septic treatment area designed for a seven bedroom use level. Jim Jensen, applicants' contractor, has advised that a kitchenette was never installed withtn me proposed guest apartment. There is a sink and a microwave oven. The building staff has advised that a separate alarm system has been installed within the upper level of the garage addition and that because of limitations or location of the original gas line installed to serve the principal structure, a new gas service has been provided to the apartmem. Electric is still under one connection and as required by code there will be no assignment of a separate address for the apartment area. There is a gravel r-rking area located within the street yard of the propert>'. This area is not shown on the survey nor was it approved by eilfter the County or the City and was assumed to be a temporary parkine area at the time of the consiniction of the residence by bom the Count) and the City.' Section 10.61, Subd. 5(A) would prohibit parking within a required front yard as follows: . . . open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a require yar area e.xcept that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within 10’ of an interior side lot line and to within 10’ of a rear lot line. Parking area is located within the 50 front/street yard area. Issues for Consideration 1.Primary access to residence apartment is not within principal structure. Access to principal sttuemre is via a connected first level hallway that eventually leads to original earace Review west elevation Exhibit H. roof design of the smicmre would be destroyed if a physical connecting corridor was installed at second fioor. Note bedroom immediately adjacent in the principal struemre ponion. Second story access is not feasible. Should grade level entryway be relocated more within intenor of existing principal residence? Applicants’ contractor should be asked to respond. 2.The code specifically stales that utilities shall not be separately metered from principal Structure. Applicants* contractor should advise if separate gas installation will be metered independently from principal residence. 3.Code does not limit the number of non-rental apartments within a principal structure. Is it necessary to make any physical changes to the former guest apartment within lower level'’ Unless there is another bedroom not accounted for m our current information, can the cuest area remain as originally proposed? A guest apartment has less intense use lhan~a full time caretaker apartment and certainly less of an impact on drainfield. Any condition of approval must include the condition that gravel parking area within front/street Zoning File #1917 April I3, 1994 Page 3 vard must be removed. Establish a reasonable period of time. Please reviw Exhibit M.^e resolution that granted original approval of the first conditional use permit. The same tindings can be set forth in granting approval of the current conditional use permit. #19 CITY Or .-CATION A ,-TTV i‘L M#. r*v/? A ’ rrvVA W*u»t **-LCr%‘ u * 'k.k'% Ti I i. IT? .*>J A I *1^ • ^'V 1 7~A I ti^ • vv PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 315 Tonkawa Road Qrono, MM— iiiCElFT-T^^S Y^. . ;^299i30 cool ROl ivy:: nTvw/ • crndU.on.. »seV^rmlt ■ Guest Hcuse/GueslAEar^ents Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -------------------------------------------------------- applicant Phone (home)__475-0986 Name James N- densen. ilpnsfin Hnmps, Tnr:— —^Tin^cconti Address 601 Lakeshore Pkwv #1225 City _. Minnetonia-------^»P_5S3Q5. OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name Frank & Martha Bennett Address 315 Tonkawa Road Phone (home) 473-5673 Ci^' Phone (work) 334-5600 o76..g__________Zip 5535£ DateProperty Acquired 12/QQ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - „ . $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application ' $125.00 Residential Accessoiy Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) X $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ' ” $150.00 Duplex Crcdit/BIdg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ■ $200.00 Land Alteration -------- Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule • v $100 00 Renewal Fee (no chance from original application) --------Afler-ihe-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , . . $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75,00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~ $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____ Present Use of Property X Residential Other (specify) r 1 required submittals 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 9. 10. Completed Application Fonn. X3escribe request in deulL . • t- Cextified Propeity Ownen List of owners within 350* (you can obtain Uus list from Henicpia County Department of Finance. A-«». Government Center. 34S-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. ._^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (exuting and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). . • .v Uiyf Qf the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not currcni owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (sec staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please atuch a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application YOU ARE REQIURBD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF ® FOR REPRODUerriON (ll" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMEP^ SUBMnTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. submitted.) The Applicant and Propeiry Owner must sign this appUcaUon. Pl^ remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff;--------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE ««»««««» Uus .ppUc.U0» ^b^fo7pirpS« of inv«j«.u™ »d veritoUon of Uus itquest. Appiicuu »Mb.« U1 a.. of thta change prior to the meaung. Il )EN5EN HOIDES. IHC #191 CARLSON CENTER • 601 LAKESHORE PARKWAY. SUITE 1225 • MINNETONKA, MN 55305 • 612/475 0548 • FAX 612 475 2459 City of Orono Request Description 315 Tonkawa Road Orono, MN 55356 We would like to request a conditional use permit to be granted in order to provide living quarters for a full-time nanny to be employed by the Bennett's. In order to accomplish this, we would propose that the existing quest bedroom in the lower level be converted into an office/library and would not function as a bedroorn. This would give us the same number of bedrooms as originally approved by the City. irt' RUN DATE 03/01/9ABATCH OM* • ’ V HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST'V'^i PROP AOOR.? name' r.-s.v'T' F>-ii':iiJTAXPAYER ,.K-^^NAHE/AODR 38 05>117-23 22 0007039A0 BAYSIDE RO MICHAEL 6 FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 39A0 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PUIN m 5S359‘ LONS LAKE (M 55356 *® 05-117-23 23 0021 1%PROP AOOR V®®*®’ HESTLAKE ST S ,rf^O»«R NAME 0 S PERL A B J PERL ^hV-^TAXPAYER 6REG6 S A BETTE J PERL'•^,w:;^^iNAME/AOOR 309 N LAKE ST 3B . 05-117-W 23 0029 v-;W.RROP AOOR 00391 NESTLAKE ST ?/;«^'0»B«R NAME I E A M K BERGSA6EL -^>'^^5-TAXPAYER CHARLES A BAL6AAR0 J^XtUim/MiOk: 391 WSTLAKE ST ^ V -.A . LONG IAKE W 55356 4\ •*7v i PROP AOOR TAXPAYER 0»MER NAME v:w.:Ij^MAME/AOOR -i .. • :■, m. ... ^ . 38 05-117-23 23 0033 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MICHAEL 6 FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3960 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ' ’1 '“iiT " i'- > <r^#PROP AOORr^i^C0bJ»*mK NAME ,tf^.TWAYER i>^'i>/.-^NAME/AOORr^mt'f- 38 06-117-2 19 0019 09080 BAYSIDE RO M J A M M HARRINGTON MARK A MONICA HARRINGTON 9080 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 & \ cm^■% .(V^. r PROP AOOR name TAXPAYER- /-‘V^NAME/AOOR . *. V 38 06-117-23 19 0021 00315 TONKAWA RD F B BEt«<ETT A M M BE^WETT F B BENNETT A M M BENNETT 315 TONKAHA RO ORONO rW 55356 »* 'A • •■V • 'I' ■ 1 ’■• 38 05-117-23 23 000903965 BAYSIDE RO FRED BLANCH JR FRED BLANCH JR 3965 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE FW 5535638 05-117-23 23 002208325 NESTLAKE ST I E A M K BERGSAGEL CHARLES A BALGAARO 391 HESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE FtJ 55356 38 05-117-23230025 00399 NESTLAKE ST EDNA T ANDERSON ET AL H/L EDNA T ANDERSON 399 NESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE FW 55356 38 05-117-23 32 0001 00920 TONKAHA RD AltnCK R M PRATBERNON EOHIN C GAGE III BARBARA C GAGE PO BOX 59159 MPLS MN 55959-8250 38 06-117-23 19 0019 09165 BAYSIDE RD J A M ALT JAMES A A MARIE A ALT 9165 BAYSIDE RO OROfW MN 55359 38 06-117-23 19 0022 09095 BAYSIDE RD HAL BOON HENRICUS C A CORNELIA A BOON 9095 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55359 \‘ . V' : •REPORT NO. PI935901- -•PAGE II38 05-117-23 23 002000038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GREGG S A BETTE J PERL GREGG S A BETTE J PERL 309 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 PWA * • ^ " * ■ V •'* \ *■f>* • , .* .• T ' •#' .'v<». •••‘:* . •; 4’':<• I',-..38 05-117-23 23 0023 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED I E A M K BERGSAGEL CHARLES A BALGAARD 391 NESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE m 55356 9. ’ ' ' * ^Vv.y.:-J ■ 1 ..r< 38 05-117-23 23 0026 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO E C GAGE III A B C GAGE EOHIN III A BARBARA GAGE 960 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 1. • t .'••jv: 38 06-117-23 11 0006 09010 BAYSIDE RO CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANO CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANO 9010 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ♦'.f • •" • i *>; •. * • t ‘ ''‘ ^ * ■■■i* •Vi- • • • < ■ J"; .•'* ■' i 'i * p > V'.' 38 06-117-23 19 0020 00905 TOtKANA RO K A C DEOOLPH III KARL A CHRISTINE OEDOLPH C/0 KNUT-KOUPEE PO BOX 8630 MPLS HN 55908 I--4 f' • f •( •.V ‘..V ■ ■'■'u-iK i* ‘9-t \ .K"1 ' r iv,/ 38 06-117-23 19 0023 09105 BAYSIDE RD D L COHEN A J L LAMB DEBRA L COHEN 1992 HUMBOLDT AVE S MPLS M< 55903 .-. V/ v; -v> ’• /'•** V Y ’■r• • ■ •. ;• • ? ■ • • X*.*n «. .*•■V* • •» I.v,v. *‘i£rj>v;K'^'••••'■.•r •— \r ^ 1^* ‘';.x i‘r■ ; - . •K*'- :,-•. -r ^fr.'/>;. •<. •ky^‘ ‘ •* •^•^••! . HE^MEPIN COWTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»t«RS LIST04135 BAYSIDE ROC»fCR NAME - . CHARL.O N « HELEN F HAYSSEN ViafcJAXPAYER V CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN ^^^NAME/AOOR 4135 BAYSIDE RO• V:NS?\» : • /«TOTAL BATCH 004 00019MAPLE PLAIN MNc' , • : ;. .'• .'• »•.--X .' /X. . .A.- • '. .>• |;,v ■ J.:;. ■'v:-'"X* >■• ■•*■■ •-. . ‘‘ ^ Vi#;• r.: e i^*Si v:*‘■I ;v*' *. >•—v., .I.” V . • •• if•■f, • '' ••; • • •;rlSfeSijK/v V ' ' i r • ’c * . * • ' * • .■•• * ^ ■•' '"'y ’. i-.' i.'-. -•k i f C-?ii *X'•fix'i ^-’.A j # t*. ’. » ; .•••...■ •. • o & I I REPORT NO. P1435401 >'^ V^•'.PAGE 12 .S :'<v;t > '•■3ti;v.'. ■ •*. ..r •T^ h‘V' ». V »• ?.■• ■• vi-'H ' -■ « *!r' Y •'■'■’•>■>* : '■■ Vv .J. • V".. T,‘ ■?':(,r* . / I |jLar:'ati • :•' ‘"A;•; r>!<‘ s'- . • -a;-1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND.TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS:DATE ON THE RECORDS' OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF.' DAT ^hm.y '^1 HhOL A f * :'I--■ \‘Mi'i'i-.v'• { ‘V >.i*- !■;/f ‘^'.' -i*; • \-a -> - ■; ■, ■ • '“N ■ • VHil ' V-' •■ •'J r»i S#PS'-' mm.- . ••f^v :r«^' '■;. (/»' (I ('Tots ■HUX:;vTfy^(<6J mm*. M*STrT5 JL ;4)uv W. *5 •M ^^ (?5) / ? ~r \ ?rr‘ i2>) (c») . • ( 19) ‘V« */i St-in % (<0) ri«T or 10» ^5 %n crini SI(14)i S \Kiu Jr (?0) (eo- •^'3 9 RD^ NO- : (?») 4 cr • ST f .p *c;3) Mi mr • V «5T (^5)' TiW -Tg-7TT!rZ ;i! ^ ^'1 77TT •0 (26J »■=.=■»-—'—'^zrrr-j---------if Sir.Oi J ; 5; rpTT ] fi' ii5 / * (Q) ' ^ *jm?2!s .p / V : J V ' «t Vt«51 fl! m; / ^ V\M *5 90 / Vi 9i (39) ^1 f R* 86 I a ^ 5'8 06 ^ I :r or 1 «(14) r 1 iti r 30.'/3(15) 9 J'O <8 *2 f R ^8 / R (16) • »6 T «• 60 / R (17)'» 4(9 1 "'* /-•<»II ( IB) rn 8 c'v' y r' **/ 4IS n t ■■« O) 1 (^ 06' in- as . t•. •• I• • *• •. V . . •! ADDRESS CODE __ Addrtts System type CITYOFORONO Date Connected to SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal Sewer TomIc!on leg at A2 Q Standard trench Cl Mound C3 Oth^ Property 1.0. *-* v^uiy ____________________________ L«jal Description_____________________________ ^ Date of permit ~ 0/>^ .... A Dishwather A Disposal A Permit No. Buildlno type No. Bedroom?-^^-^^ or GPD 7 51^Laundry SEPTIC TANKS: Mettflil fj'rrrt<^- Cr>f%erf Proper outlet end Inlet f)^ BaMlei ChL .Capacity 1) ICOQ_________ 2) lOOO ..................... in.Liquid depth to RO level - Height of tank bottom above water table OiK^Distance to nearest building 11^ DRAINFIELD: Total length of lines to i //7P^K bvsl Number of lines Trench width JO /V jr///lOaoPS tvu ^ Total treatment area (sq. ft.) <^r^[ Height of dralnfietdabove water ubie 3j j . Type of filler materia)___Soil type ________________________LJTJJyr\ j L Loarr^ Distance from nearest bldg. IC?^ Tile size P(/(C P«rr latt Depth of fill over dralnfield . JQ.*’_____Depth of rock over tile ^Qunder tile / «min/in 5 c I I £ J2s .«**a t Eo k. \ 8 well DATA \ I i ^5 8 It Xo 4 E2 5 I I 1Q. O M\ c ■O 5 d(b b.>] ‘V- • » « • • • 1---------------------------------------------- _J ;e i•n----------• Pifr* Him © i-:.7IzFs^ G If-lMr- si., pi «!, S:-;lll i/ m I' '(/-ry- / 1 H !l&Ii‘ ‘‘Is:;.W- 4.>!l i n'!ii ■ /% 2s< c 1 w,!M i‘ 5«, 1'/ il 'I I 5' i OE-iO iQ z U QcQO Q 6j6 Q 3=0! <E-0 *P2^ r ] CITV OF ORONa ' 2 City of OFtOINO M RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^^26 _________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23r SUBDIVISION 4 (A) FILE #1613 WHERBASr Jenseii Homes Inc. (hereinafter the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 315 Tonkawa Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract C, RLS #540, Hennepin Countyr Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and HHEREASr the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit a non-rental guest apartment per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision (A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1613. 2. The property is located in the LR—lA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres minimum dry buildable lands. The property consists of 3+ acres in area. 3. On January 22, 1991, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings; A) The rural property contains adequate area to meet the septic needs at a 7 bedroom level use for current and future needs. B) The property contains 3+ acres of land where only 2 acres is required. C) The applicant has presented a valid need for the non-rentai guest apartment. D) The interior design and layout of the non-rental guest apartment within the principal structure satisfies all pertinent standards of the zoning code. Page 1 of 4 1 1 .^CITY- OF QRONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2926 4. The City Council permit to allow a safety or^general welfare of theruriT:r^\^ia n^s the proposed level o£ of the Zoning Code and with the intent and objectives Comprehensive Plan of the City. Incl^dYng^^h^ ^SrtfeTffe^roY^h^^Voposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or "p\r M^nicipr° City Council hereby grants a permit the Zoning Code Sec-cion 10.23, S ar>ar-i-ment within the residence installation of a non-renta ‘to the following conditions: located at 315 Tonkawa Road, subject to me 1. Authorities granted only and property not with the a building permitSust be exercised by application fo^^^ aporoval or the ^^fciSl°c^\I^t\^on%^^f^?hfs^^so^u^7o ”n^^ on that date (February 11/ 1992). 2. Violation of or >^on-compliance with any violation conditions of automatically terminate anyof the Zoning Code, shall automati punishable as a authority granted herein, and shall be pu misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned P®”®"® have beha*i*f oIagree to the terms of thrs resolution and Vh'e ITcll.liroi t%\Tr%%\uti.n in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 1 CITY OF ORONO February, 1991. City of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. ^926_ _ ___ _ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of 1 Qgi. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor L(yi ss. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson Doro y M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, ^ municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NOTAm HENNEPIN COUNTY i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ _ _ day of ' ^^?Tv before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared /J ^- - -;- - --—-- - -■known to me to be the person(s) described xn and who executed t foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and dew. mnimniitn •ipw« 9-*-92 notary public Page 3 of 4 1 City of OROINO CIT> OF OROMO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2926_ _ _ _ __ INNESOTA ) ) ss. COONTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this \\y\day of 199 i 3 foe / said coimtyf j ribe<3 in and who €X t ^now7Vo “.e ;o'b'rth^-p4r'jcnis) descried foregoing instrument/ and acknowledged that he (th y; the same as his (their) free act and deed. SUSAN M. LEHRER NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY My oomnUsaion npim 12-B41 NOTARY PUBLIC 'v../ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) }ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary%5FnTUithin'’fnd for said county, 'personally ^JTip t"o be the pe r son (s) described in and who executed foregoing instrument/ and acknowledged that he (they) execute the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 f / ■:x To:Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator From:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:April 13, 1994 Subject:#1918 James K. and Julie Ann Lynch/Daniels, 1225 Orono Oaks Drive Conditional Use Permit/Variance (Renewal) - Public Hearing Application: Renew al of conditional use permit and variance granted in 1988 tor construction of driveway Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.55. Subd. 8 - Prohibits filling within wetland or within 26 ’ of a wetland Section 10.55, Subd. 10 (B) - Requires a conditional use permit for work in a flood fringe district. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - Application Plat Map Property Owners ’ List Survey Resolution No. 2413 Staff Memo 4-21-88 Summary The subject property is Lot 7, Block 1, Orono Oaks, one of the few vacant lots remaining in that subdivision. In 1987 a variance and conditional use permit was granted to the previous owners. Mr. and Mrs. McCaffrey, for construction of a driveway through the wetland between the cul-de-sac and the high ground (see survey. Exhibit D). They proceeded to constiuct sue a driveway, but thousands of yards of fill just sunk away and no driveway was ultimately deemed possible at that location. Thev then requested and were granted a variance and conditional use permit lor construction of a driveway on the adjacent Lot 8, which at that time was owned by the developer of the subdivision, Gerald Neslund. This driveway encroached the 26 wetland setback, including fill right up to the edge of (but not into) the wetland. The driveway was only roug graded, and never completed, nor was the required 24" culvert installed. The McCaffrevs at that time ran into financial problems and eventually lost the lot. It has been purchased by the Daniels ’ and they are requesting a renewal of the variance and conditional use permit for construction of the driveway through Lot 8. I 1 Zoning File #1918 April 13. 1994 Page 2 Wetland Encroachment The driveway as rough-graded brings fill to the edge of the wetland as defined by a 952 0 ’ elevation contour. The City was granted a conservation and flowage easement over a smaller wetland area as part of the 1978 subdivision, but review m 1987 indicated the wetland was significantly more extensive. A new flowage and conservation easement incorporating the enlareed wetland boundaries using the 952.0’ contour was granted in 1987. Given the driveway base work in place, staff would suggest the following conditions for renewal of this application: • Prior to Council approval, applicants ’ surv eyor to stake centerline of easement to confirm driveway will be within said easement. . No additional filling can be allowed at the point where driveway abuts edge of wetland (about 50-100 ’ south of road). Filling in this area would likely requtre MCWD, DNR and Corps of Engineers approval. • Prior to review by Council, applicant to provide certified copy of driveway easement over Lot 8. • Applicants to provide certified copy of executed flowage and conservation easement granted in 1987. • Additional conditions of approval discussed in prior resolution. a. Since land alteration permit #00623 has expired, applicants ’ contractor shall obtain a new land alteration permit for the driveway construction. Applicants shall call for a final site inspection upon completion of the new driveway. b. The culvert at the drainageway crossing under the driveway shall be 24 in diameter. c. Applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to confirm whether they will require any permits for the new driveway construction and whether they are satisfied with the restoration work completed in 1988 (no further restoration of the aborted driveway site will be required by the City). Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval per the conditions as noted above. r ir:<LO #"! me w* • I ur or^.i-M>»o vu# f 1 erry of orono . generai land use application PROraTY LOCATON oaks_pri^ .-TTV ,-C '■'rf‘*'>JWA I I C*l t'tli.’ltWrv*'A.-r r-cerre I AltniVkU k‘< * AWW 1 V=Vr‘^‘iAA<V^ A w‘fc/V*. WVW t-'i t£,V iC’i^Cv ----iqCkOO Type of Application to ^ - T^ZTT s^2 2-M:zQ^ Property Idcntificaaon Number (P.i.u ^---------------- I U AW-—ya-' rr?:?* ^ ' V r / -.i:. applicant Julie Ann Lynch-Daniels f4amc Janes K n^^piels------------[Name ---^ /^ililirn H;.rrinaton Rd^ I%One (hf»TT>e’> 4i^Q-4R44 — Phone 544-8851------------ ritv w,wzata-------------------------------- 03^'^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name same_____________ Phone (bome\ _ Phone (work). Address, City Zip. __(month/year) I (aoy \50_nyy ------ ™ ct. W1W'“ - “gs KSS.““i.«> --------$173.00 Guest Housc/Gucst Apartments ■ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg -------- $250 00 Commercial/Indusirial Use = - d«i*n..cd flocpuin Gradifis Aod filling - 10| ^^hin 75* of lakeshor®------- Grading, seawall, reuimng walls within - XXi^al“« Tnt'cUe from original appUcaiioo) - iK^rPee Double Curmn. Applioa-on Fee OTHER Silc Plan Review (+ consulun. fees) nn Vacation$250.00 Vacation $175 00 Easement Vacation ^ $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 App^s Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District--------- Present Use of Property Residential X _ Other (specify). 05/22/94 l7:2tJ Int: c.iiT ur uku N u ^03^coc 1 .1 Li REQUIRED SUBMITTALS // - - 1. Completed Application Form. 2- Jd, «<)“'“ , 1„ „f owners wiihin 350' (you can obtain this list from 3. IV Cenined A-603, Government Center. 348-3271). 5: — CeSc of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer .0 handout for survey 7- — “rutriS'tlS'ns involve - S“r~ “ “ lb. ----Mh“«orpl«^^ stoch’ «P«“' >i« you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY M COFIM OT L^GE FOR REPRODUCTION (U" X d "lents pl«». «c. to beSUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of an uocumc f submitted.) The Applicant and Propeity Owner must sign tins application. Please remember that your ^plicatFon is not complete if the above inforuiation has not been me u Certification by Clerical Department that Laud Use Appbcauon is complete. ____ Initials of Clerical Staff --------------------------------— m appli^oT „Tct«rrf ^lllcTpayS f "usSIi cTm« iSIr^d in review of rhls appli^rion. and cerrifics rha. <h. informatton . . DareApplicant’s signapitc ----------- OWNER’S SIGNATURE ,„„ii«tion and further authorized reasonable ^ry'X aU. --i-o” n?e2!b?“ for pSrpSseVo/invcstigatioo and verifeagon of this request. Owner’s signal\jwnci 9 iL—III I ---------------------- Applicant me^Calf^nlttal. into dt= Clw otnc« 25 Conmission are Held on ibe tnml Monday nt Jd a achedoW m«lin«. of ihii chaB£6 prior fo ihc incciing. ^ . DATE 03/23/9A!WTf:iArr MTCM OOA . -i i '- *4.,;j,V.PROP ADOR (»•«« NAHE ^■'^.'TAXPAYER* •j'.'>5HAME/AOOR'' -' 'V^-S PROP AOOR rfA0»MER NAHE 3 ‘^YAXPAYER ^h :3?(nahe /aoor V^.v;. ;. 'tPROP-AOOR >;:i(MCR NAME ‘vJyTAXPAYER 'NAHE/ADOR AOOR -^f;:i%OMNCR NAME i-i^^TAXPAYER V iyj NAME/AODR 58 '02-117-25 21 0002 . 00040 SMITH AVE P Y A A H ALHORTH , PETER Y ALHORTH AMY H ALHORTH .40 SMITH AVE HAYZATA MN 5539158 55-118-23 54 0002 > 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN fONR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL I 36 35-118-23 34 0005 00040 ORONO ORCHARD RO N D t 8 STRUYK DAI BARBARA A STRUYK ^ 40 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD N •. HAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 34 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO D T GARDELLA I T GARDELLA DAVID T I TRESA GARDELLA 1230 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 /•’.I r? V-iiiPROP ADOR " OWER NAME ^/jV^TAXPAYER;^.%^:name/aodr ^ • ■ 58 55-118-23 34 0012 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO J DANIELS I J LYNCH-DANIELS J DANIELS I J LYNCH-DANIELS 533 HARRINGTON RD HAYZATA m 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST38 35-118-23 33 000701555 ORONO OAKS DR D H SHAN AMR SWAN DONALD H I MARLENE R SWAN 1555 ORONO OAKS DR LCNG LAKE MN 5535638 35-118-23 34 000300038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED G MARC WHITEHEAD ETAL G MARC WHITEHEAD 1220 LYMAN AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 34 0007 01320 ORONO OAKS DR D D I A N CARLSON WILLIAM I BEVERLY JENNEY JR 1320 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 35-118-23 34 0010 01230 ORONO OAKS DR DAT GARDELLA DAVID T A TRESA GARDELLA 1230 ORONO OAKS DRIVE LC^ LAKE MN 55356 38 35-118-23 34 0013 01335 ORONO OAKS OR S K NELSON A J H STEWART SUZANNE NELSON/JAMES STEWART 1335 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 ' • v*. ;{;^pr6p AOOR , vv. QM*IER NAME TAXPAYER , ' \TOTAL BATCH 006 00015 ■ ■■ ■ i REPORT NO PAGE ; . > -N •• %" ■. PM35401 . , . ^ . ; 'V J*. K .. -. / ^ ' A .. )’• "4 ‘ *O*. ‘ * ** ■I' J. *.' h38 35-118-23 33 001000030 ORONO ORCHARD RD J L MURPHY ASS SMITH JAMES MURPHY A SANDRA SMITH 30 ORONO ORCHARD RO N WAYZATA MN 5539138 35-118-23 34 000401220 LYMAN AVE G MARC WHITEHEAD ETAL 6 MARC WHITEHEAD 1220 LYMAN AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 34 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED B BORDSON A N C BORDSON BRENT M A NANCY A BORDSON 5707 HWY 7 il25 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 f % t % t 38 35-118-23 34 0011 01200 ORONO OAKS DR J TOMHAVE A B K TOMHAVE JONATHAN A BEVERLY TOMHAVE 1200 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 35-118-23 43 0022 01190 LYMAN AVE B E PALMER A J M PALMER . BRIAN E A JULIA M PALMER 1190 LYMAN AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 \ 9 Z) q:s o Ul u £ If)lu < q: LUo h 9- 1% uz .8 CO m [if 5 o ■(Off £ foS s ^!f dS §1 corn S if 1 * ^2 ^ r»«> I >r( b ur ( 0 if ■%/ V vj rc X B _4 *« Z CITY OF ORONO City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3 NO.2413 A RESOLUTION REVISING the conditions op approval OF RESOLUTION #2305 file #1211 THIS ITEM HUS BEEN MICRBFIIMED ___ Tanri Comcanv is the owner of the property WHEREAS, Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter located at 1^5 as Lot 8, Block 1, Orono Oaks, Hennepin -City") and legally McCaffrey (hereinafter "the t?th Or°ono^e|al% described as Lot 7. Bloc. 1. Srono oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and HBEREAS, the owner ^st^^uW.^'^Vgrrnteli I variance to M“"i=iP*l_^°”"5g|tion 10.55, sibd. 10(B) pet Resolution^i?o\^^^rt*hi “c^vVorci^rda^Vd ^of no?rnam"a^°«Vdnn%rTe^ to construct a private residentral driveway; and WHEREAS, pursuant to g^tained^ the^necessary of the approved driveway through the wetland; and WHEREAS, due to soil ^a^fted^by°the^contractor driveway, construction determined that successful &%t\:nT\hU^°d"rlvewV/"wluld not be technically or economrcally feasible; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 1988 fra foca?ionf^re.Srrn “rn ^remVn-t-trrrfh-Lot's, Block 1, Orono oaks (1335 Orono Oaks Drive): and WHEREAS, the Council ^ "%^etland°on^Lots 7(8, driveway will be located 26' .^’toortn lU|th which is lessexcept for a portion of approximately 100 in lengt The fhfn 26- from the edge of the «e\land but not 11 cross a Council further finds Vjfhe fe^asibly crossed in conjunction designated drainageway which reLlt in no impediment to curefroreVecfed flfws through that drainageway; and ....... -jr. "fs:::?. "S"'- drainfield sites within Lot 8; and Page 1 of 5 CITY OF ORONOy City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2413 Other property m light, air nor pose a fire adversely affect traf neighboring properties; would not merely hazard or other ‘danger to neighbor necessary to serve as a ^^^Sardlhip or difficulty; is necessary toalleviate a demonstrable harasn p applicant; and would be preserve a substantial of the Zoning Code and .... ~-5*> “2 use permit to allow the Sill not be detrimental to the the edge of the cff the public, would not adversely health, safety or general hazard or other danger to affect light, air nor pos decreciate surrounding property Neighboring properties, of th= property will be in ItlriV. ^"^trt‘he‘nn';'emtd^Vb1ec°tives of the Zoning Code and cNNIrehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or ™ore of the re^NNe’^iNe council hereby “uitNble location within 26* of rhe"'d"lLg'na"teN’'we°tNNNT a^n°d%eguiring sn^^s^ement ^a^cross^ the neighboring #2305 are hereby revised conditional use permit grantee xn to read as follows: • r 4. *nnfi23 issed to the applican^ 1. Land Alteration regain in effect for the contractor, Mason Homes, and for the proposed new restoration work required herein and call for a final site driveway restoration for the previously inspection upon ®^l®tion of the revised driveway,approved driveway, and upon completion 2. The contractor shall to ®tland and shall remove the fill material that was ^ ® _ac area. Restoration any remaining fill placed staff no later than shall be completed and approved by City staii October 1# 1988. 3. The wetland areas disturbed by the instruction attempt shall be »“°«f^^’^°/NNiNs«uct a driveway state. No further attempt to construct or « in that location is allowed without City app Page 2 of 5 CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2413 4 Prior to commencement of construction of a driveway in the revised location, the applicants shall provide the City with a copy of a private driveway easement over Lot 8 in favor of Lot 7. 5. The culvert at the drainageway crossing under the driveway shall be 24" in diameter. 6 The applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to obtain any permits they may require for this work. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only. Restoration work shall be completed by July 1, 1988. Driveway construction must be commenced within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (April 25, 1989). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himseir, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of April, 1988. ATTEST: r'y?'). Dorothy Halli City Clerk (^1 Owner (ySl^y (Lot 7) 4/- . ic roper^ty''OWher (LOtTS ) (4) (5) Proo^^ty Owner For Cheyenne Land Co. (Lot 8) Page 3 of 5 Co»^-tooR. Co»jtova7-^ ^Xo-rifc^v. V—onr “Z.. ^<1.. \-tm <\c.. IA> ^ 9i (K • V < ll/ \ \ -m • •«»•• * -••• ••• ••• •• r • CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. On this //day of JclIu 198^ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personallyV X, 2 * WWJLW-**^** —- -— - - - - - - -a r t - appeared m. rr>f <^a-f^rgu and JudiA known to me to be the person(s) described inandwhoexecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ^ (they) executed the same as .h4e (their) free act and deed. KATHLEEN S. SOROKA | NOTAtY ^UIUC - MINNCSOfA HENNtPIN COUNTY ^ *•'' My eominitjion t»pif«s I2-I6-9I jCc<^.tcc^— NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 198 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the pgj;son(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES t • L.CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO resolution of the city council 2413 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) STf^r'y'me'a Mot«y VubC^ within and for said to be instrument, and acknowieage his (their) free act and deed. JANE ANN KLANQ ; NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My Commission Exa Aar 7. IS33 my commission expires STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) s s • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )/A , 198^ before me ^ J instrument, oersoiT — vtl^as-v Public witnxn anu -- - - - - known" to me to be the (their) free act and dee . m.jj^NE ANN KLANG I •WTAfly puBuc — Minnesota HENNEPIN COUNTY ■Y Cofflouttlon Eip Afit 7 lan ----------------------- -----^ Mayor Grab«k and City Council Mambars City Administrator Mark Bernhardson Dates Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Ad»inl»trator April 21, 1988 Sublecf nan Oer«ld HMlund/Ja»*» McCaffrey, 1»25 Orono Oaka Drive - ’ c u.r.Aariance - Bequest for Fevised loeatlon Request: Acendeeent of previous approval, to allow development of drlv«..y thru adjacent lot at edge of wetland. List of Exhibits: A. B. C. D. E. F. G • H. Site Plan Submitted Staff Memo of 4-13-88 Applicants Letter of Request Soils Report By Braun Testing Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 6 (B) Resolution *2305 Approved On November 23, 1987 e<*,«e Staff Sketch of Culverts, Probable Driveway Area, 4 Septic Site Additional Pacts a.»,w. nf Aoril 13. 1988. since that memo, staff hasPlease review the memo ot April u, i^oo. ruffe have walked the proposed revised driveway route. Some additional facts ho been verified by staff, as follows: 1 rera Id Neslund, owner of Lot 8 and one of the developers of Orono oaJte initially in selling Lot 7 to McCaffrey refused to grant them an easement over Lot 8 for driveway purposes. Now, a^r exDeriencing major problems in development of a driveway, they note that Neslund has agreed to grant such an easement. ? It was apparently Ncslund's intent from the start to access Lot 7 v’l.a easement thru Lot 8, since when the house on Lot 8 was ®®"®Yefed^ in 197 “ the base work for the driveway now proposed was complet.d, ,‘nd ’ Culvert placed across the minor drainaqeway at the northwest corner of Lot 7. 3 The existing driveway base work generally is 26* or more from the edoe of th^wetland as we would interpret it today, except for a portion of that driveway approximately 100* south of P®*'® *^77; Note that the Wetlands Conservation and Flowaqe Easement on Lot 8 i. approximately 90* away from the proposed driveway at this point. i The ororosed driveway easement location will have no effect on f \ dr7inf ield sites on Lot 8, and within Lot 7 the driveway can ^rr^nsrructnd to chsily .void conflict with proposed primary and alternate drainfield sites. / .•m - i .< • •• .'.>4 ^ tf I. ^ y**" .** 'i*» .-. ■•if- ♦ .*• ' 'Zoninq Fil® 11211 April 21, 1988 Faqe 2 -. 5. Approxlrately l.S th, portion of Lot * went of **** ip 03 Subdlvinion • (■)»Comniislon r*vl«»*<S Municipal Code Soction 10.03 snooi a^^^ ^ i:uLW\ *rid‘rt - :^::nent^‘ iV.: -«v^o;reSe7p.;M}^i^^ - - -"oVd-r? s\tu ’ J- *H ‘E T*L^t “r*"not appear to sl9nificar tly affect development of Lot 0. Strtft Reco8i»endation even the circun-atance that ,V A ^i^‘7pVrVrm« \*o"il^^ of the wetland over the propJlTed'^aeement on Lot and encournae construction of a d . Y and for all but a short ’;/m^A^‘"L^ir.;/A‘o7e“7ro“thV-V'^^^^^ au'bject to the followln, conditions: ^Ka. T of culvert in poor condition at the drainageway crossing near'the boundary between Lot 7 and Lot 8, shall be remove and replaced with a single 24 inch culvert. b To the greatest degree possible, the sand fill shall be «Joved ^rom the arL of the unsuccessful driveway construction, and the wetland allowed to return to its previous natural state. r. Thn driveway to be developed within Lot 7 shall be constructed to avoid conf lict'^with the approved primary and alternate drainfiel sites. d. The f7;7L"V.Vo”^ "SfTiVr.7d’ contractor sh proposed driveway. Applicants contractor shall^call for a final site inspection of both driveway sites once the sand fill IS removed and the new culvert is placed. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. TO: FROM: DATE: /3. Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1994 SUBJECT: #1919 Ty Bucey, 2677 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing Application: Request for a number of variances to construct a new residence to replace one that burned just before Christmas. Note: You may have to walk on the property to the south to access this site - the neighbor has no problem if you do. Zoning District - LR-IC Variances Required/Pertinent Code Sections 1. Lot Area: Required - 21,780 s.f. or 0.50 ac. Existing - 12,894 s.f. or 0.30 ac. Variance - 8,886 s.f. or 0.20 ac. (40%) Ordinance Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) 2. 3. 4. Lot Width: Required - 100’ Existing - 60’ Ordinance Section 10.04, Subd. 14(C) Hardcover: Pre-Existing 0-75 ’ 7.9% 7.9% 0% 75-250’ 47.6% 43.1% 25% Ordinance Sections 10.22, Subd. 2; 10.55, Subd. 8; 10.56, Subd. 16(L) Proposed 7.9% 43.1% Allowed Variance - 40’or 40% Ordinance Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) Lot Coverage by Strucmres:Proposed Prior Proposed House:1,646 s.f.1,599 s.f. Proposed Deck:496 s.f.0 s.f. Existing Garage:615 s.f.615 s.f. Existing Boathouse:160 s.f.160 s.f. 2,917 s.f.2,374 s.f. Proposed (2,917 -r 12,894):22.6% Allowed:15.0% Previously Existing:18.4% Variance (No change) 18.1%’ ! I i Zoning File #1919 April 14, 1994 Page 2 5.Principal Strucnire Side and Street Setbacks r • s* (Since the existing detached garage is proposed to notv be attached and roof ratscd 4 -5 , variances are required for its existtng v^e out 10 ’ 1.95 ’ 8.05’ (80%)Garage Side Setback: ^ , g ^27%) Garage Street Setback: Ordinance Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) 6.fundefcu^nt technical definition, top of bluff based on a ntid-lot cross-section is 2' lakeward from proposed decks) Required Setback from Top of Blutf: 30 Proposed: NOTE: Under the proposed'zoning amendment, no variance would be required in this case ... Ordinance Section 10.56, Subd. 3.2; Subd. 16(C) List of Exhibits A - Application B - Letter of Request 4/14/94 C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Proposed Site Plan F - Pre-existing Site Plan G - Hardcover Calculations H - Building Plans I - Bluff Cross Section by Staff J - Photos Submitted by Applicant K - Documentation from Previous Grading Approval - Resolution #1079 Discussion The Rucev residence was destroved in a fire on December 18, 1993. On Decem^r 30th the S rSeTan application fo^ a building permit for "fire repair". That apphca.ton -va, subseauentlv withdrawn when the owners concluded that while the house ps , 7. ro>;t of reoairs would approach the cost of a new house. An application for constructi n^w residcTe orthe site was submitted on Febmar>- 15, 1994. A demolition permit was issued on February 25th. In the ensuing weeks the building inspector called out a number ot problems with the rellmd to budding height and grading plans. It was the initial intent of the property owners to Zoning File ^1919 April 14, 1994 Page 3 be required. A variance application was submitted, and during review of the application staff has concluded that there are six specific variances that must be addressed, although the public hearing was publi?w n r for the hardcover variance. That in itself raises some ques.ton as to the validitTof this hearina. although the immediate neighbors have been notified ot the variate application and abutting neighbors have seen the proposed plans. Stall anticipates that a number of the adjacent neighbors will be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting. Variance Review Lot area/lot width The lot area and lot width variance is inherent in any substandard lot situation where an e.xisting house is removed and new one is proposed to be constructed. At 60’ wide and approximately 1/3 acre, this lot is practically the smallest building site in the immediate neighborhood (see plat map). However, a house has existed on the property' for many decades, and improvements have been made through the years. This was obviously the Buceys’ homestead property and denial of lot area and width variances (hence denial of buildability of the lot), would certainly be a hardship for the property owners. Unfortunately, the small lot size magnifies the degree of variances required in order to rebuild. Lot coverage by structures The 1990 "accessory structures" ordinance amendment included limiting lot coverage by structures to 15% of total lot area for lots less than 2 acres in area. The pre-existine lot coverage by structures was 18.4% including house, garage, and boathouse.^ The new proposal increases lot coverage to 22.6%. due to the addition of decks and a connecting link between the garage and house. Are there sufficient hardships demonstrated to justify this magnitude of lot coverage by structures.^ Hardcover Pre-existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 7.9%, and no changes arc proposed That hardcover includes a boathouse as well as stairways and walkways. Zoning File #1919 April 14, 1994 Page 4 In the 75-250’ zone, hardcover is proposed to decrease from 47.6% to 43.1% where only 25% is allowed. Pre-existing hardcover proposed to be removed includes small portion of drivev^ay, a slab behind the garage, and other miscellaneous rearrangements of walkw'ays. Is there adequate hardship shown to justify the proposed hardcover variance? Are the proposed reductions in hardcover adequate under the unique circumstances of this lot? Street and side setbacks It is wonh noting that the existing garage was reconstructed under variance approval in September 1978. A garage has existed at this location as close as 2’ from the side lot line and approximately 20’ from the street lot line since 1975 or earlier. The variance is necessary because the roof envelope is expanding upward in a substandard street and side yard setback, and the fact that the garage and house will now be attached suggest that we are now being asked to grant setbacks for a principal structure rather than accessory structure. The neighbor to the south. Mrs. Smerling, has expressed to staff her opposition of allowing the garage roof to be raised, noting that it will block her morning sunlight to an even greater extent than it is now blocked. Is there sulticient hardship to grant a variance allowing the existing garage to be 4’ higher as close as 2' to the side lot line? Bluff setback Staff initially reviewed the bluff stams of this site approximately two months ago and initially concluded that the top of the bluff was at approximately the 955’ contour and that the proposed construction met a 30’ setback. In the weeks that followed, intensive bluff interpretation discussions with the DNR ensued and consequently staff concluded that the current code is neither practicable nor defensible. That is why tonight ’s agenda includes a proposed "top of bluff” definition amendment. Under the current definition, "top of the bluff" for this property is 2’ lakeward of the proposed decks, and virtually all ot the decks and a significant portion of the house would be encroaching the required 30’ top ot blutf setback. However, under the proposed ordinance amendment, top of blutf would be approximately 47 ’ inland from the shoreline, and the 30’ setback from top of bluff would not be encroached upon by either decks or house. r Zoning File #1919 April 1994 Page 5 Planning Commission should be aware that while the Vergeyle bluff variance application was approved, since then other applications have been held up until the code amendment is completed. Planning Commission may wish to consider whether the hardships in this case justify granting of this variance without delay. Grading Han Discussion The previous owner of this property. Mr. Holzer, commenced grading on the property’ including work within 75’ of the shoreline, in 1979. After extensive review by the Planning Commission and Council, a conditional use permit and variance was granted to allow grading |o continue subject to specific conditions. Please review Exhibit K. Resolution #1079 and Exhibits, which define that approval. As a result of the eradine work, existing grade today appears to be perched 2’-4’ higher than the properties on either side, held in by retaining walls. It was clearly Mr. Holzer’s intent to have a fiat vard rather than a vard that gently slopes away from the house towards the neighbors as the submitted photos (Exhibit J) suggest. The City apparently found some merit in the proposal in the potential to direct drainage away from the neighboring properties and towards the lake. Building Height Question The applicant ’s architect, Mr. Cradit. has worked extensively with the building insj^ctor to desien a house that meets the 30’ maximum height limitation. In doing so. he has in eltect created a three-story structure based on the definitions in the Uniform Building Code. Brietly. that definition states that if a floor is more than 6’ above grade on all sides, the space below is considered as a story. Therefore this is a three story' building, while the zoning code height limitation in Section 10.25, Subd. 6(A) reads as follows: • u • u. "A. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2Vz stories or 30 in height except as provided in Section 10.75". (Section 10.75 discusses unique features such as antenna.s, flag poles, chimneys, etc. which are allowed greater height but are not pertinent to this discussion). The building staff has rarely used the IVi story- limitation because it is difficult to interpret. There is no definition of what constitutes a "half-story". As Planning Commission is aware, it is not unusual to have a lakeshore walkout residence with three levels of living area the lake side plus a steeplv pitched roof. Such structures technically meet the 30 eig limitation but in fact may be as much as 45’ in total height from the walkout grade to the peak. Although it is essentially an aesthetic issue, the neighbor to the south has suggested ^^at this house will tower above the neighboring houses and may not be visually compatible wit. t e ^4. Zoning Tile #1919 April 14. 1994 Paee 6 nciiihborhood. Planning Commission may wish to discuss whether the magnitude of variances requested impact the visual aesthetics of the neighborhood. On purely the height issue, the City has not to staffs knowledge denied variances specifically based on visual incompatibility with the neishborhood. Of course, visual compatibility is in the e\e of the beholder. In viewing the site on April 13lh I reviewed the plans for this propeny with the neighbor. Mrs Smerling who would like to see the house reduced in height to become more compatible with the neighborhood. Putting the house deeper into the ground would lower it, but a walkout trom the lowest level would We to become a "walkup" or alternatively, a variance to allow e.xcavation for a walkout in the 0-75’ zone would be necessary. Planning Commission may wish to consider whether, in the scheme of things, such a proposal should be pursued by the applicant. It would be inconsistent, however, tor the City to allow 0-75 excavation to create a walkout when the City has denied that in a number of other lakeshore applications. Request for Speedy Referral to Council Please review applicants’ letter of request dated April 14th. Due to the various delays to-date, applicants wish to commence construction as soon as possible. Options for Planning Commission Action Planning Commission has a number of options, including: 1. Approval all variances as presented. Approve some variances but not others 3.Denial of variances. 4. Table for further information. 5.Other. Any recommendation for approval should clearly specify the hardships supporting such approval. A denial recommendation should be similarly justified. If the request is tabled, give applicants very specific direction as to how to proceed. Note: Prior to the meeting staff will confer with the City Attorney regarding whether published notice was adequate for the total application. n r*n CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^ 4? :#• \ *-rrrv " nr^n^n W 4 f f cr •.•MC'MW Initial Application Fee S200.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming strucnires $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) rzzTrct At^niyy,^ I AtrA. i yz’,v:>nnruvyX v« wA w*VV'V Oi QE}i 1 M X I %.*• v\f 'mK T'. ,T-. - 17~ M I i. XlhJaWocrcTO ru'* Vf-w f PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ZXsTX'X ^<DifsaT cool ROl Til:i 0*^0 Njo /•'T/T'C’/': Vw*/ A.W*/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - yy ? - 3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required surv'ey. Date Propertv Acquired ______________________________________ i (do) <^o na^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential ___other (specify)_________ Zoning District:____________________________________ (month/year)7 APPLICANT Name ~TZ t7ltc^ Phone (home) <4*^ ____ Address: OiA^ca <k CcQ ,'rrfo _____ Phone(work) ^4*^ 1 • "I (alS City: Q^-^v<-o_______Zip:_52^_t (if different than applicant) , PhoneQiome) ^ 1 o Name ^ S1 Pc r u o <4J>hone (work) ^ *53- < m 7 ity: &■ -rt? ^ Address: a-’p /y. l c /^ City: rJunu^^rtH VJ Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated ConstnictionCost $ Describe request in detail: (Ur^Aw<£>g/ ^aJ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage K Setback:Front /C Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF LNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing pj2j^O/ou:^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered romplete: 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ^__Completed Application Form y Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 34S-327D . M Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). t Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and mclude hardcover calculations as required In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i” x 11" for reproduction. y Topographic surv ey (existing and proposed elev ations) if any changes in e.xisting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 81^:" x 11" for reproduction. y Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy x 11"). , List of the legal names (include marital stams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) c* applicant's) if not current owner(s). y As ag addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may oe requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your varianc e application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICAiNT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inforrnation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay addition''! (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred ih review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and cor :t to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s Signature , | Date Kj____ OV^TVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by CiP/ staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. # M Date ^'-f Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Cour :il. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise die Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. S • V \ CITY OP ORONO - BDILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Total Fee; $ Entered By: Date Received: Date Approved: Pemit #: ALL INFORMATION MOST BE SOBMITTTO REVIEW WILL BE STARTED (See Check-off List Enclosed) THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) OWJER or (^IJTRACT^^ JOB SITE ADDRESS; - - - - - - - - -—— (work) *4*1TS NAME OP ..U.-..A^UC^--------------------------- PHONE: (home) hailing .nnpp::^. 7/,Tl iU>-------- CITY:_Oeo~o---------- ZIP:------------------ /-ma-r-pArmR: g5^ C^^oAA.T.OAJ PHONE:_65^lllO- - MAILING ADDRESSCITY: _. ZIP:_6i±*l STATE LICENSE: t ARCHITECT/ENGINEER; liVr> MAILING ADDRESS: hJQ, NAME: iAAovn.Q TYPE OP WORK: New Addition Demo_ _ _ Remodel/Alteration_ PHONE : 3*1 *i**-^*^ *4:^ CITY:ZIP; ^€>4lg) REGISTRATION # <01*43 Accessory Structure____ Move Renovete Lend Alteration PROPOSED WORK (describe in detail): k)^ tO Q tO€>C*^\ kJ—QsSzpL^^^ 0AAA.A STORIES: 2-^ SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: {'4rO^_ " # NO. OP BEDROOMS: 3 GARAGE STALLS; ATT. ESTIMATED CONSTPnCTION VALDATION (excluding land): $ l*pCP. ^g>0 I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that Love cl^^plete and accurate;^that the work will be in ordinances and codes of the City and with the State Bull ne-^'mit* and understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a p - that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. APPLICANT»S SIGNATURE;DATE Ty & Mila Bucey 2677 Casco Point Road Orono, MN rt€> 535 April 14. 1994 Orono Planning Commission Charles Schroeder, Chairman Crystal Bay. MN 55323 lation :h the :hat I t; and Chairman and other planning members: I am writing this letter to give you information for our variance hearing scheduled for April 18th. 1994. • % On December 18th. 1993 my family experienced a fire in our home that made it necessary to tear down our house at 2677 Casco Point Road. We were moved to the Lafayette club for temporary housing and started planning to rebuild. Due to the extremely cold winter weather we were delayed and a further delay occurred when it was determined we needed a variance for the hardcove\ I - the 75’ - 250' lot area, even though we will have less coverage than before. On February 1st. 1994 our family was moved to moved to temporary housing near our burned home. The temporary house was on the market for sale, but we felt we could build before we would have to r.iove. On April 1st, 1994 we were given notice of a sale and will have to move by May 31st, 1994. Therefore, we are requesting that our hardcover variance request be considered at the hearing on April 18th, 1994 and forwarded to council chambers for their next meeting on April 25th, 1994 for final approval. You may contact us at 471-9335 as to your decision on cur request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ty and Mila Bucey I • ^ 05/25/94 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERr/ INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 15 >• » ■ \ . ^ ' . I 58 20-117-25 25 0001 58 20-117-25 25 0002 56 20-117-25 25 0005R02665 CASCO POINT RD 02691 CASCO POINT RO 02695 CASCO POINT ROmBEVERLY SMERLINQ WILLIAM F MILLER JOHN T REDMONDBEVERLY SMERLINQ WILLIAM F MILLER JOHN T REDMONDDR2552 H LAKE OF ISLES PKHY 2691 CASCO POINT RO 2695 CASCO POINT ROMPLS MN 55405 NAYZATA MN 55591 WAYZATA MN 5559156 20-117-25 25 0020 58 20-117-25 25 0021 56 20-117-25 25 0022R02677 CASCO POINT RO 02665 CASCO POINT RO 02659 CASCO POINT ROMBTYRONE A BUCEY I MILA BUCEY C R SHUTTS A M B SHUTTS S S STANOA A I S STANDATYRONE A A MILA BUCEY CARL R A MARILYN B SHUTTS S S STANOA A I S STANOA OR 2677 CASCO PT RO 2665 CASCO POINT RD 2659 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA MN 55591 NAYZATA MN 55591 WAYZATA MN 55591 ' 58 20-117-25 24 0001 58 20-117-25 24 0002 56 20-117-25 24 0005 IR 02684 CASCO POINT RO 02660 CASCr POINT RO 02664 CASCO POINT RO iME ‘0 L RUNKLE A L F RUNKLE V A G BULLER D L RUTACLE A L F RUNKLE OAVIO L RUNKLE VERNON J BULLER DAVID L RUNKLE IDR 2684 CASCO POINT RO 2660 CASCO POINT RD 2664 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55591 WAYZATA MN 55591 WAYZATA MN 55391 ♦ 36 20-117-23 24 0029 58 20-117-25 24 0059 1 )R 02(49 CASCO POINT RD 02648 CASCO POINT RD ^ME J A J SCHERVEN J W A B J ESSEN * \JON SCHERVEN JEFFREY A BARBARA ESSEN TOTAL BATCH 005 00011 )DR 2649 CASCO POINT RO 60X 120 2646 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55591 " i •V 6 . . |1 *, ■ f • % ♦ • w* * '‘rr'/ HfV 't I *■I SLi I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF., •r; T* ‘ • f V, , . } ♦ •« i ■.» . . .4 ' ! !* \ : I » f •» '1 . i * ? f- ■ .. t .1. •i:•• • , • •1% • 4 ■ ' ? ■ 6 •; \ • V • ».»• 'Tr.'.5* J‘ '4 ■ ,1 f \ 9 f I 14 'B T5 YG<3'zr Lfd V ^ v.*p' to £.SiiSriot, hardcover calculation worksheet 4^to'^-Pr SETBACK zofiE: (ciHCLE qne )(^^0^7S^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000 Existing HAROcove.q in Zone t.A. House B, c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk length X . X WIDTH s • X MM X s X _» 1 (a>X -10 IS Iho X X at tao'. X a'\$o S.F - S.F. S.F. S.F. E. Patio / )eck F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC sheeting S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other .76 (i') - ^l'7i' Total Hardcover in Zone Total Proterty Area in Zone S.F. |T S.F.B 3C9/-7-T X 100 * ^ /OO 4" yiy 1 I4-0 v^o ^ • 5* - I3c# )C ^o.i ^ -S •€:^ST.>^.HARDCOVER C alculation '—;;;;;irK zone : (c.hcle ce) o-?? c_7u ^^ Existing Harocov £r_in _Zohe -------------------X ---------■ -i^’- S • F • House length WIDTH _ S.F. S • F» S.F. _ S.F. B, Garage ‘ - X S.F. ^.^7 X c. Driveway —^ esacio 10 y t/^7. gL S.F. 'Eoi). 0 S.F. 0. Sidewalk i 4T-S.F. *3^ *fb ^ A(UU d T<3 9 l&O.O 'L0‘ 0 S.F. A(Ul« Td ^ COUW^CT n y ' ______________------------- ?ATI0/ 10. r F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BYplastic sheeting __s.F. __S.F. 73 ;/V UOlLtU ®p -----2 _ X G. Other ^00. s.F. s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover ln Zo"^ Total Prorerty Area in Zone S.F. j-| X 100 m aiMt s.F' S 4-7-fe '% /’/Ce'43>y577AJ6. K V-Yty ■ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHPEL^ 0-75'C^5-'’50') 250-500' 500-1000' ScTBACK ZONE: (CIHtLE ONEJ U /> ^ Existing H ardcoves in Zone % 4^' ^ • l^yo—s.FHouse LENGTH 4- WIDTH To X ^ B. Garage c. Driveway 2o ■2.1. C.7 X W O D. Sidewalk _ M- 3 40 W ^ X X 5 6 e.]eck TT.\o --------------<;-\o.> F,Landscape .^^'^'wSoB«^cA4N h' ^ ' • 'Z3 fineiwswc 114- — X . ^t»CA on Total H ardcover in Zone /ZG s.F S.F S.F. S.F. _ S.F W /M 5& s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F y y y _ s.F. Total Pfoferty Area in Zone 6'~>'5y.v' X 100 “ ?^^v,y_s.F. fl H^.l fF/wPosef5 V ffC' (-6T pFAneN«nS'TS^ H/w2bce>v«?ve..I4€».g?>yN> ^eTA>MiM^ uimA> 0EMP ^inw -V ??'’WD6 ^iPtwfttK. / / ' iT ^r&fi i /V / / ' ' X'' /A ^ // / // / A ' y./ . ' .' A ■ /^ A /A / A /M Hupp^^.fLjL,rj IO.» WALL \ ^ ^ \ \ A 9+.S' peTAItJlM^WALL ________ : 'i’ ,i~k — ^ I II ^ iwi < Eiciinvi^ ,AAFA^ • ■956.0 bK ‘^^gj-CT* B.>t XPit^ ^V. 30 "^inrUniii u1 Bg»^A/ fe^.g>l / r-eM<:ve e)asi. Pi^ivfiWAy*^f ^Sf-ACAt (.1 A. . ^ , %#*. tv • > KUiVM inOHiM »H» •• cx3.‘vn«^ii )• jo*« rmc tf*\4 i>ti xi>’w«o# v •XTf JLXt 0*^ A»«J X*) i» ATW >•« r.n l»J< Q»V<U**' i kf* «* WU (■» *M»«k^O Hi*» JT>1» ■*!.«* *»OtO 'iW.’ft ,u Tjru »ru»ra »r.«) vuaru #3 *«jc:3i-.ii A*.>a' T^>r, (t • 1*J j3 t*<TJV* XTBTCir'u<rr k>m TT»ifi 5T»rftli*»* t' usra «a/oK^ ‘m^op* •mb'uviiui ivsw i^K. rNwia»*» qk» »315W»1MW 0«» J»i *C&>3 iJ3UID K SK.<U^I T^CjUtTi T> h<r>*A TT'X'. lO*«0 (t 3««ll9l W #JH M SV3Tr£)CtN« W/»/» t}Oi^Or5-*3 »>**J V»U -•fcO 01 iw>d « TTV»« 0-rt R»Hrf M0C3fl»;l»»J3 CmlQ C»-» Un#»« ’^»7 fci2»ll iKt *TO»f*tc>n T*»hM3iv»i$ mo« t^NOO KT-y C^.IWOHJ* v»»r. w3i?ia;>rc U ATUvClrfL rxjja 01 r»* cr* 1N» licxi» T-t'r. n i-n*; 'MOUOnulxX- io i««ii Irfijio oor tt» tn»<; ici3»».‘<i3 11 ;'V ?;v:5 1 i: p • ^ i » V. y f i, r UJu \—a ;• I ^ c ‘ - iitjasil ** ^ ^ Xi ^ *;i J; •• ;« £ " # « *• 11 3 i !5 “tr t.t >>*r ^* *■ c u o :^ss-' =j >f * «• to ^ i •'linir Jj ?1 ^ k*KV " I >Htiip:“ C •* 2 « W o •• c f c « ^ a L;-;^''>-. ;.• U-- ' i'.Z •V •,'.*; .’7.f’’v?- - >' '•«* ^ • •; *‘ : • ■t’-'VV-.-vb * rv/.: , . • • . * ■ ■’.»•' ••• • ■ ’» , -'.'•-/A V.. .A . v.'" ; " V V ’■ .*?■ •“ '•! ^vi f ^ u*. ♦• :i > / - > ♦ * V - ,*. ;*>. ,^.j.„|i*r.'’Q;..■■ .'. •. ■■■ x:: •/-, r^--";r-•;|.’| ■ ' • - ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ^ •.•’ • ! < ' , w.->~r^ I- :•' .* * * • . •;* '3 \ ■ f.‘ - ■ 1-; • Y----- m TOT^iVg'r • -*- ,*. ■ :*. •• • •■•' T ;.!••■•:. . -X ••c jf • ‘ •♦ -' ■ V. ’•’. * -O'* ^<v2 -T'- . •^r ‘ , *.- i! '*• ••’•' .i ^ ^ *v«id ivcrt ..|?r —t—r—'—-— • i ‘Oz rr,Tr,—r-iiiia -AM t3fi^j v^r-^mv I via nrvi;,^i*.V;i(aV :^0'w. aJlH •; r s' ‘•'H: ■%■ ■^ • *'•>.» i • -I ■ :, . ' . ■ ■t • .r ,‘-■•S sf :'7 * 0 o® •.n|-.a.•*Vr*. *1 >: .‘vV- > : ‘‘• h.'!.- V; ./;1 r - :."; .■■.•*'*; •• ‘ * i‘ -. i.3: rjj ;>.•■■■■ i ^v v jV ’'' •■•,>A -> r'-’-Si- ’i ■M''V :; lA:^ - — r "tt S'-lil'Qri;.!-!: *' 'M ® ■. *' •■' • k e 3'S-^ I I::? ;w.-t >!... - .. .'■ y ,-v :..*• l\\ oo v.;.\ 1 •r* • • . • .’• • •■' 1... ;% S ■ t •> - I ft*VI • ,t| ^ ii.O o^y !v \.>v -a •:• ,.• j “’v • h' 1 i •A,' | • r.1 '^ ir fc1 . ...6 \ -‘ V- 1'" } If f* »*’’ "sA d •■•...,.,rv a-'-.-'- — “• lL§\ ' ■' ■5C. Jl ■H *J UAC VnyAg ^ '^J. a[ i 4l »r *- 9-1 r KV •A 0 J •. ... '*/' , •* :* *, •'•' V. —g-IiSZ / 5?!;^ A ^ ■ ' .■ /4 f ' !T?:^ r. .‘•^r'orj ./■V / /' / / -V»* ' s-t .V +••‘7 r-5-^'riT -i c3-^ W: ■ . 1 .■ ^'" I ■■■"<■11 I i ^^iMrniL * -' ^4'.. I .*■ •■-. .*• - ••; * I •,.)» u I ifl i . o -C3\ <^"0\ msiliiIIIlH « • •'. •*•. l ■, d 1 •*• • • »-t:.-. I* ■ • • • " ■.’ •n^.r ‘ — ♦ * .- i ’ . •, / ■ .. ^ •"• ‘ V • 51 Hi ' - ■ \ ." <FSf. ’ W:^ : •§|-‘ v C"' •"? • J ■.• >. ••»*•, V/« ■' v<>^;-A* *;y » VV:^.‘s' Y.'V.;-, \*; PB ••- 5 4^ t % .;. . Wm 'p- - 'l;-v ii- • 5 .|i dT i, • j:/' .. V' ^ •■ •« •> “ V V": •*' ■ !*rX ;■■•.•- ■f:>'* iv ■’% rrr P pY ^■* <y, > .V •.. .'* ■/:* vr.' • 'f -.V ■ -0 ■¥ V.:; \ . I P\- V>\ Tv- ..0 . >1 ’ • X c. •^ •? g^» y*nor. ’ •:»! </j *-^5 •' • •• ’•:> •. T V j ,• / .' V. . -"W i.^1 «- .. ‘ r> g V9?*.3) f z\ Jvi»io f~ •• :-• “■;l^ I ,:S3• . A 3 »3» ■, , PP-PPP ^ ior^i oa^il 0Z\ ■—- .. ‘-V •• '.•.' - 5lv .S^Stv; •. ..4v*‘: Gt 1 3*rliJrf f • Cl y? 5 5 : V<V5^ nr^'\ .^ll<.t0(2) •. f » *,» • * .; «. •■ •:>• • rvr'.' *; c :t^ = !2ia§‘ :J V .*, .k i ^ f . ■• • ,•••.;■ ■ .Uk : - '-x^ / VI ' *:' i* * ;* - V;: •* •* • ♦-•y • ' ^ -• '■ X-- ■ :-x.:^t. :| r ' * *'- •1*"".“‘ .•. *■.• « I • .* '' • ‘» • ■■ -. . ■ . • ■' ‘i-* V*• ••• i" *. ... ••,- . ,•*' • ■ • •'2' ••■ •. •...fti-.'.:;,T-*:v-..:: .■;--va, fe' •* T K* ^ ‘ • ■' ■ t ^.^|:|5|V. iS •. : '. oS*3 ’ . \ / ‘ . 1 '. --------- —;*. V '/p •* * ■ •' • ‘ ioi 1»" 1 > ^ 0 1-h5- . \ •• «3 f : El§ fes:l;l^lj.i; • '• •. * ?.T> . “ ^ \ - ' ? ’• ’ ■ • ■' i ' ■ '■'.'.• •;. 'U. ,'p ' “ • V* V -ill .:v*.* - ..r' ' -llr 1*. liifj I %bc^t k^‘i i i jl v/ i ■ y >5^ Z i Sh «>aS8r w u. V p Vi .• ■* I •.* « f *1s*. f ;. .. f •*.! •■•*•• •• •; O' I V V O ^:-Sr=4ns. tc V •'.‘VI, ^mr * v 3^1 ri"<vr» -W- • • V* .'■: ■'r..- r 9'^ 4- - 1 -• • .5 •'v.' r:tVr.-_‘i>r-r;iisv: ■ \- •' 'i.'t ?.Xll , •* : r.V tt. Vt] s ‘=>-Oi -a:"»• vr .. •>, . f. ••-!.•* ; * *** ■*. ;. . ^ ■ \ • -“»*/.•- J* . ,•■ A Mi ja8's?sg, V V* v-.y; c :’• . •■ <VNn<r<7»j»j»A . '. r • tot•.r rS.J? ' .*^ •'*-... i'" :• • •• ... ’• •; . S . ■; .*. • r ‘;. ■o :/0 il* •' '.> \ ^. 4'.nnn •V ?•’ ’?T'f ‘r-t . •* I '^^\^ZCZ')\ -------<— g .{ I utr—r|^ ^_ir--_-“. •—irrrLWaij-. cir-»x.',it *~ i- f SI i,. ■ Is':. V|i f* u* o»'ii4:*;«TmmitrrmuiU'onax»u:A3:rfVuisr , ♦ ^. »i’.' ■•».-♦ '•>;♦■ i»Pfe O-^ :.’li^ • f al ^ • . ’.r*«! u;.'.-»T: \v v i*- ;.‘i ■• •••# *' " .j’ •*; Vvili “• • r r* a • V >»C- ■ ■’ • ‘ •:;u‘;;,;-'fe=B5= =i ,• !• • . "> . ‘.•••■ ‘ CT e-ais ’// I .'••vV .•■;•>•. r.v- -.if C'' i ;S‘. • I- ' %y7r V :• •.'• ;, '•V fi i >a2. V i .<p~j) 1 /tear. w it .;c::^:xl r; ■ pX •’: -• ^ ••;*. * n.f.i. •O ‘Jjr ^7 b’-J- i J : 2lli •' 't* .•-Txs:jT -•V i „>’«rii2»<uf jX : •< v;;-^v-/- / *U .*7k3H Z-ll .+ <3-21 C>.^£ • • •• ‘ ■> i'X. -• ■•* — .V • •. if : . If -*•- • - Ti-miJa LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.LAND SUKVETORS&EG1S1TRED UNDER LAWS Of STATE OF MINNESOTA SCALE r RESTORATIOK SERVICES IWC. 7M1.73rd Avcayc North Miowiapotii MtnonoU SS42B ^wmgan (Errlifinlr JLL ■«J'- Lot 135. SPRING PARK ^ropo^ buRdirtg Mormoion muN bo oflh opprovod buSding plan boforo oicoviPon and oonoirucboa 7h» erOy MBsmantt ahoafi an Oom puts of *wofd or mformatton provHS#d try horobr corafy Owl o^ w • om and oorrscf Rrpr»—nf<»on o» a aunwf of ww ■ounOii^ of Ow abow doocntod land and Ow location of all buttdinot and via- Mo ancroactvfwma. H an|^ from or on aaid land. •dn>o»odbruaOi»a itK February ^ __94_________ pevideo « . 1^SifDcd 0-DENOTES IRON I fi Raymond A. Pmch. Mmn. Ray. No. 6743 A \ - ’^ V'l * . - Jr^V'' >>> ip ii^i-.\ iiai I'^JTJii ;l tin ' 5f;. s»^‘*-s*'< nllV % ifelil$ . : IW I ■juBiL* t'2l ✓m-mn• 1- J ':' .4. i - - ■V ‘•> -V /.N • .-/■ ^:,V-V. ; ^ ■' , :* .'a :^;-:v-::v:;V/;^:^ i',:' • aAn'l *;Si mm P. ^/.^^:V':^:>^‘»,-...v’f. i. ' • < -■— • ^' ,■:» v| ♦ -. ■ . -j\ - • ‘ *,■ -^*i: I •> .» ■•Vv.. •■ .’ - i*\\ St f,-;.'-'..v;'^'f- ^:w , » ,- * , V 1 pr?:'r •u.-‘‘ *1 '*^. 'll *\ 1 •>1 i; V ..A :K: •%,"¥*> -- I ia^> ________-tfli-.- ■ i%i Sg;. V.,;. r> •*;.;!'.its-..s s^•.^ 1 rt ■ .' J-!-, ’* I? |[' ■■■^•'^^l‘|'VSi .5*1 V S.V' V- •-. H- '• V' ' J <j DHV • 'SSmtm'/Mtr '-• •-p.'V' :iV, ' .' , ‘i-., y. if I iisi&b:,:prk/s lirf » -V » I • •: - 5 it' ^ !A f ! ^ Cr - if'v.-v';■ . resolution no. WHEBEAS, the.Plan.in, emission .na^cou^ -ufiiir^cco.^pLsi'^-tain ,.aain, on his p.opes.y iocatea at 2677 Casco Point Roaa. an , WHEREAS, P'^°P°5ithin*^75^fh!'^of^Lake Minnetonka, which alteration on an emban^ent ^^Jin 75^^^^ work tequires a variance to Se^ „,„icipal Coae; ana Plain N.anagenent Section 1 General site grading and WHEREAS, said proposal «n 1 9 ^ building perinit, retaining wall use pern,it pursuant to Section WHEREAS, some of the above j®®a“"ance^ana Ls been-“na^fpe^aLrbHrrutroL^^riSir^^piication, NOW, therefore, BE infomati^suppUea by thrip “u"an?! the^'c^ty Councfl hereby makes the following fm mgs of fact: a.- = of the work are necessary to present1. certain portions -^qe to the neighboring undue erosion and/or wat ^ boathouse on the SHS: 2. certain amounts ^^e ?“=“"|„tinrPo"lible^erosion T/liniT,i ^rt^e-I^pUcLt^s^-bankme^nt. i;a/of a?«crthf ?low S“L?tacr2ate«"lor”r«ion Control. 4. Certain other amounts of ^“^^"^t^required tol^ Vill construction above the may affect the ?rktrhrre°^isiriirty'frrLf^i^ng properties. 5 certain amounts of the =°"=“"?^ircode Sh^cS^’"'' sections 34.201 and 34^202 o? hardcover within prohibit the construction average setback of 75 ft. of the lakeshore or ahead of the av y lakeshore residences. Resolution No. Page 2 1079 6. Some work is required to be accomplished as soon as possible to restore vegetation to the land, correct improper portions of the work already accomplished, and to prevent undue erosion over the winter. 7. Special conditions applying to the land in question are peculiar to this property and immediately surrounding property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. 8. The granting of portions of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjo\nnent of a substantial property right of the applicant. 9. The granting of permits including a variance to allow a certain extent of the work to be completed will not in any way impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare, nor the value or security of adjoining properties. 10. The granting of the permits for some of the work will not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code. 11. The granting of the necessary variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties to allow correction of the existing problems and to secure the interests of abutting property owners in maintaining the value and security of their property. FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the foregoing findings the City Council hereby affirms the conceptual approval fcr such work as granted at the September 25, 1979 Council meeting according to the following conditions: 1. Work shall be done essentially as proposed on the drawing made by Gordon Coffin Company, dated September 18, 1979, as clarified by the letter of Robert Mitchell, dated September 25, 1979, except that the top of the buried portion of the wall across the front of the property shall be at elevation 958.33 ft. 2. Final grading shall be reviewed and approved by the City staff. 3. Drainage patterns shall be essentially as shown, with no piped drainage to Lake Minnetonka. 4. 711 exposed earth shall be satisfactorily sodded or seed J to control and prevent erosion, with steeper portions of the embankment to receive additional vegetation having deep root systems. 1 Resolution No. 1079 Page 3 5. Any work required to correct and restore areas on neighbor's properties shall be negotiated and/or resolved between the parties as a private matter and is not a part of these conditions. 6. Work shall be complete'’ this fall, preferrably as noon as possible, but in no case later than December 1, 1979, ' .ccept that portion of the work requiring planting or vegetation may be deferred and/or completed next spring, tne intention being to fully protect from runoff and erosion damage over the winter and during spring runoff. 7. Failure to satisfactorily complete the work shall be considered a violation of the zoning code punishable as a misdemeanor as provided therein. 8. The applicant shall sign this resolution as an agreem.ent to complete the work according to these conditions. //'. /'^r 7 Date Date /O-sr-J? ATTEST; Robert Mitth Date Adopted by the City Council of the City of Oi^no oi the day of October 1979. William B. van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: WaTter RT^ehson,^ Clef'k/Administrator TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: April 15, 1994 SUBJECT: /j^l920 Phillip Otto, 4116 Highwood Road - Variances - Public Hearing i** Z ' I# m 'iJ 7 ■«:• V'/’'A*^'- • , S; ^ 7• '• * \ Lv* ^ t ‘V • !V,.r i. ' : i'; V*. If U f f ---f # ' - - ■* ^ • f / * Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.25, Subd. 5(B) A. Lot area Required = 43,560 s.f. Existing = 16,888 s.f. Variance = 26,672 s.f. or 61% Lot width Required Existing Variance = 140’ = 80’ = 60’ or 43% Street setback for principal structure Required = 35 ’ Principal structure = 23’ (original house was 13 ’, review Exhibit B) Deck = 14’ Variance = 21’ or 60% D.Side setback Required Proposed Variance 10’ 3 ’ 7’ or 70% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Inventory 75-250’ setback area E - Hardcover Inventory 250-500’ setback area F - Elevations G - Survey of Original Improvements H - Current Survey Zoning File #1920 April \S, 1994 Page 2 Description of Request The subject propert>’ is located directly across the street from the Applebauin residence (Application #1915). The original house was destroyed by fire in 1989. The applicant wishes to construct a new residence within the approximate footprint of the former residence, review Exhibits G and H. Side and street setback variances would have to be granted tor the new construction. Review Exhibit A, applicant notes lot is narrow with sloping topographies to the north or rear. Upon your inspection note the yellow garage structure to the west. Otto wishes to alien the house with the vellow garage. Major portions of the front yard are located within the rieht-of-way of Hiehw^ Road. If you stand across the street, ♦‘•e retaining wall that defined a partial drive and serves as a backout area for the Applebaum residence, is located at applicant’s southwest comer. Members may walk down the old drive that served the former residence on the east side of the lot. Walk back to where the topography starts to slope towards the County Road. It is possible that the house in its proposed location would be able to achieve views of the lake. The two triangular additions to property were acquired by former property owner so that existing drive and former house were included within the boundaries of the property as both encroached into adjacent property. Issues for Consideration 1. Planning Commission Members are asked to consider area and width variances for new construction. Will you also grant setback variances? Can 30 ’ wide house be located on the lot without the need for setback variances? 2. Has applicant selected the design of house that fits the topography of the property? What is the hardship? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Any recommendation of approval must include the requirement that Lots 39 and 43 be legahy combined. Review E.xhibit B, note that each lot has a separate PID. ch rTT^r r,c ‘“nT-khl I I w I Vfc'l'C'ttW . -.-k -• — ^ i, t *t u » ' ^ > / .* ^• Ai%r»»tv^ w*i ♦ AWi- % TZ t * ■ ■, W*HV*^»*• 1 w'w w'ft. V vvVv 01 Ctri ChECK JL *r,i M 4.«.'V • W -r.-i M V • W r L rcTyT* Tm*4 ir’ vnn »u t i I I »»“r'4^j* I ww ^ ">c-io^ C'f'j rr'Vi T i T1 iy^ Hr^T/W'U'V* WW4 l\VA ^/»7 /-r,o VwV' *.w*» / |k cm’OF ORONO - VARIANCJ^PlJJ^-nON -. ^ Initial Application Fee J|. (S50.00 per each additionar^ihance)"*^ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change fruni original application) Variance for non-confomaing structures $200.00 Afier-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) \ PROPERTY INFOR.MATION , m.J V Site >..-» i2d. ---------- Property Idenlification Numfer (P.I.D.)_g 3- Vy —OO3J,--------------- Attach legal description to application_if not ^,„„„tfvyear) Date Propen>' Acquired__________^ ------------iliia4a.s------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. L L Present use of propern. ___residential jc_other (specify Zoning District;^------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ...™ . vT Ptwne thnmei — applicant Ol. 1 1; o rn t O^lo Phonetwork) «g6T-^3.'3Z. 1 Adtesi; laASa S|-7i>vrP0£b E.t>. City: OW-NER (if different than applicant) pwTworT f Name________________________________ Address:Citv: DESCR1PT10.N OF REQUEST Estintat«l ConsmtetionCost 'fey ' VARIANCE^^QUIRE^ Lot Width ___Hardcover -----Lot Coverage Setback: jl. Front ^ Side Other (specify) Rear Average Lakeshore ----------- ---------^ ^ . 7 t(attach additional sheets if necessary) rcrijn.-rrrrr 1^1 I -irA oA• w t*c:a aa V • W i;i* VmM I1M t t/O OAi Tii:p“ MVA # Jl X ‘ m7 / v^/P- \/w*/ t. k-*/ / E,-/^A/riCi 5^ **)isz REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. __Completed Application Form 2. __Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 3. __Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. __Cenificatc of Sur\'ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x IT for reproduction. 5. __Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/^" x 11" for reproduction. 6. __Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/^" x 11"). 7. __List of the legal names (include marital stams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ?. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included, APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Tlie applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true antLcorrect to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s Signature___Date ^ OWNER ’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner ’s Signamie Date ^3“' 9'^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J / »(rw i 1t ‘"7 f VAs))/ *?i ^vSJ t-4 {-JSS^•4 I RUN OATI Oi/16/9^.■BATCH OOS '. . ^ • -■:RROR ADOR ^OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOORPROP ADDR ^ 0»t€R NAHC TAXPAYER NAfC/AODR Sa 07-117-tS AA 0010 0A07f NX6HNQ00 RO JONN T SANBORN ETAL J T SANBORN A079 HIGHNOOO RO HQUm m 55SAASB 07-1X7-25 AA 0015 OAlOl ' NXGKNOOO RO EVA THEOBALD EVA A THEOBALD AlOl HIGHNOOO ROAD HOUND MN 5556A HEItlEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNfORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST56 07-117-25 AA 00110A091 HICWOCX) RD F L JOHNSON 4 0 L FOSS FREDERIC JOimOH A091 HIGHNOOO RO HOUND MN 555AA56 07-117-25 AA OOIA 0A105 HIGHNOOO RO CHARLES E DA MART NILLIAM 6 BRICKLEY AIDS HIGIMXH) HOUND m 555AA REPORT NO. PXA55A01 W .v PA« 2556 07-117-25 AA 0012 0A099 HlOmOOO RO OLLXS L NELSON ETAL ALONZO B SERAN XIX A099 HIGHNOOO RO HOUND m 555AA58 07-117-21 AA 0015 0A109 HIGHNOOO RD GEORGE N APPLEBAUM GEORGE APPLEBAUM A109 HIGIMOOO RO MOUND HN 555AA ■f'V: Tv- , ■ •‘t.f ‘ V <-.4 91.0 n u r PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER * NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR ' •< t $ PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAI^AOOlt 56 07-117-25 AA 0A1A9 HIGHNOOO URRY N RARKELA LARRY N KARKELA A1A9 HIGHNOOO RD HOUND MN 5556A -’/ V ; '' ’ 0016 RO « .* i f .. f' PROP ADOR ONNER NAME • TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR k . 1 irV 4 . *V J • .* * , * h t • ' * f • » or-ur-2s ^ 0051 041S2 HXGHHOOO RO SCOTT C t CATHERXrC ANDERSON SCOTT Q « CATHERXhK ANDERSON >152 HXGHKX>0 ROAD HOUND HN ; 555M '' •*'. • 56 07-117-25 AA 0D5A OAIOA HIGHHOOO RO *6 i B SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER AlOA HXGHHOOO RO HOUND MN 55)6A i56.' 07-117-25 AA 0057 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO NARREN KLXPSTEIN JAMES S LXSBETH CLEARY ' A109 NO SHORE DR HOUND MN 5556A ^ <.;* •>: • ■: ’ *;• 56 07-117-25 AA 0029 0A1A6 HIGmOOO RO JANET L EIOE JANET L EIDE A1A6 HIGHHOOO RD HOUND MN 5556A 56 07-117-25 AA 0052 OAllA HIGHNOOO RD BRUCE J MOLUMBY PHIL ono AlAO HIC,HHOOO RO HOltA) MN 555AA 56 07-117-25 AA 0055 OAIOA HIGHHOOO RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER AlOA HIGtmOOO RD MOUND MN 5556A 56 07-117-25 AA 0056 0A109 NORTH SHORE DR NARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A MSBETH CLEARY A109 NO SHORE DR HOUND MN 5556A 56 07-117-25 AA 0050 OAIAO HIGHHOOO RO J D CUSACK A C H GRACE C GRACE A J CUSACK AlAO HIGHNOOO RO HOUND HN 555AA 56 07-117-25 AA 0055 0A106 HIGHNOOO RO DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER A106 HIGHNOOO ROAD HOUND m 5554A * 36 07-117-25 AA 0054 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRUCE J HOLUHDY BRUCE J hOLUHBY A114 HIGmOOO RD HOUND m 5554A 58 07-117-25 AA 006A 0A125 HIGHNOOO RO JOHN N A ROBERTA J HENRXCH JOm H A ROBERTA J HENRXCH A125 HIGHHOOO RD ORONO MN 5556A f* ■i '■ ; • ! ' tv <• i I'*-- . .^ • '■ * t"'* 1 ^ . * • • 1 • ■ *• • ijf " • • *-' * ^ » * V V ■it V?' ‘rt ■J... > • -.i:- A..*. *V *►•*:»". • > • r’ ., J- v;: V b f:, j • . ■« J ,r ' . 'I ‘ v» ** '»> ‘ * »^ * *^‘^’^'^1 ■ ^V:V^*:;ViyiV-.y .I' V:-'tv^--.>-^>-VvL.^ # .5^ F >'* * 1 ••#* ^ !:;■ *■• ••r>’ •■' V>:-,5;'Vw ■ ■ ■■*' . ■';^ r.^r:.:.,:M: bs^ »> 1 : -4*. 'V»V*.i^^ArC ■X'^^vV ••-••''/a >'■A 'r v!' V vi'' ■ ■■.,....-. Dd'i •• , '• '. V^' ■ L-*'*- y* •')i'*' ■’•‘>1 •/•’''■.' MM n>TC :..'RUN HATE 0»/l*mw' . ‘iv ;..''•' .*“ ‘S ' ■■ ■■■> ■ ."k- *“r ^> • BATOI-ops V ■V.'•• ♦f'. '•< .'* ■ •• • •'.OMCII NAME;/:N#TAXPAYER . TOTAL RATCR • f HAHE/AOOR ; % j ’ft .» • • .V. - - -. VA V > * i rjj ■•• '• • X ViTv 'il.n -1. Ar-i *>. •V: '■?/• i.•■>>;?;-li*.':,:* .■*■•■»•..■ '. • V. . .- V -•, • -v > .. ">■ • >''c V 4 •'••:*.• VI, :- '4- ' f •r . .'• • ■■ . i v,.‘ :’• -,%■■ •:. •'. ■••. : ■ 't • ••■i , ;,-l- f • * , *■ • I- ! , r *•' ^ X ■| ' -f. '■ -w:.*:1;• ‘- 'V- : • • V'.v • » * ' * * •■ 1 . --V4- .» > ’■;• . vV *l * ' * •' 4 ♦ k. 'F - - .i /’'.. . fe - J V . -i'. ' A- ■ v» ^1^." ■ I .. ..* ■ ^ .. y.HEitSPIN\,4<»,003 00018 *i•yi.«rI < > I t- /V t if > 1» % COUNTY PROPERTY INTORMATION SYStEN PRWERTY OWERS LIST • i '-. '• yf ■*f report no. PW35A01 Jj< jV. : ' • .. .V^ Ji :■' ■ ■ •' •’I. ■(•>/»tPAGE: v' fObvv■ •»•.*■ ♦- ■> ■ • ’-■•'>j-v. 1,■r . .,. V •.41 ^ i.?•:/-v’ • ..;^ • * M J-•V•tv t i t » •' '•V y , '- . ■, .y : ■'• jU««A| • v>.” rf.-‘y .uI* -f :,. .A; . . - ’ y* VTt t..'»yVv V '.'iy fey I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPE" OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF, j / Bhm ACCURATE AND TRUE » DATE- ■ i';,•. vt;: .-.. - •; • \ ‘/ V T ; • •'. ;4*-‘ ■ V. ^;--'.vv«^l!f f* i •, i',• > y t ■ ';• V-' y?4'4 />//u ^-iS- 9 ' ■ ^ :.V”4v4ii<,4! • . HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET » • . • • •. •• SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (J5-2S0 250-500' 500-1000 Existing Hardcover IN Zone A. ‘ House B. Garage c. Driveway LENGTH WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. X ‘ .../>■ ■ V V‘*5 , D.. Sidewalk _ e. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERUIN BY ■ , . FUSTIC SHEETING . J X ~t «' • I . » • •S.-F/ S.F _ S.F, 6. Other S.F Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ~T| ^2^ 4-|~n- SZiT [3 Z£££j.s.r. [3 X 100 - _ih±l-^o' /I% . ( r' >r- frr; i I •V .r $»t ^ V />/ I RU HT fcC£V>.TlOU !llll!!iimi jiMyii- ^iiiiiiiiiiii j •; \ < • R tKR E LtV^Tt 0 VI L trT I I IVRT I0 U ' > o./v9 'V^->7A‘. ‘ >V :* <1. j>6 . ' '•; i/*/ CERTIF PV OF LX)TS 39 & HENNEI UGAL DESCRIPTION OK PREMISE Ihdt part ot Lot 38, Higi ds follows: Commencing at th* Lot; thence Southwesterly al* said lot a distance of 98 fe* the property being described degrees a distance of 6.2 te* degrees to said Southeaster! the point of beginning, acco file or of record in the oft in and for said County. ALSO That part of Lot 40, Hig Southwesterly of the line dr westerly line of said lot, d from the Southwest corner ot most Southeasterly line of s easterly from said Southwest thereof on file or of record of Titles in and for said Co ALSO Lot 39, HighVood, Lake M thereof on tile or ot record ot Titles I ri and for said Co ALSO Lot 43, Mighwood Lake Minuet Ihis survey intends to show described property. It does luipi oveme.i* s or e«icroachmen• Datum: Mean sea level o Iron marker Bearings shown are based upc CERTIF P^ « OF LDTS 39 & HENNEI To: ^IPTION OF PREMISE art of Lot 38, Higi : CoiRinenc i iig dl th* i Southwesterly al> d I stdiice of 98 fe- Ly being described jistdiice of 6.2 te- Sdid Southeaster! jf beginning, acco record in the oft Sdid County. art of Lot 40, Hig r 1 y of the line dr ine of said lot, d uuthwest corner of easterly line of s roiii Sdid Southwest file or of record in and for said Co , lligh'wood. Lake M tile or' of recoi'd in and fur said Co From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator April 15. 1994 /^1923 Atelier LeSueur Inc., 2180 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. 4. Section 10.28. Subdivision 3 (A) [Section 10.20. Subdivision 3 (A)J - Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow a school of fine arts for full-time snidents at approximately 20 - 24 enrollment. OR Section 10.03. Subdivision 5 - Conditional use permit to allow continuation of non- conforming use. Section 10.61. Subdivision 5 (A) - Open parking on residential properties shall not be located within required front yards. Review staff sketch, E.xhibit Q. Note 10’ required setback is maintained from nonh and west lot line. Section 10.61. Subdivision 10 - Based on standard in code. 1 for each 7 students and I for each 3 classrooms, applicant need provide no more tlian approximately 6 parking stalls. Staff would argue that with 24 full-time students and 3 staff, 24-f- parking stalls would be required. No variance would be needed but the requirement tor parking can be a condition of approval of the conditional use pemiit. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - I^t area. Required = 2 acres Existing = 25,440 s.f. Proposed = .63 acres Variance = 61,680 s.f. or 71% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Prop>erty Owners ’ List D - Addendum E - Floor Plans F-1-3 Letters of Recommendation ghwuod Lake MlimeL Zoning File .^1923 April 15. 1994 Page 2 Handout for School References Engineer's Report Site Plan Recommending Improvements by Engineer Resolution Approv ing Metes and Bounds Division Creating Subject Property 1989 Subdivision of Metes and Bounds Division Staff Memo Application #1487 Action Notice Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting 1/16/90 Termination of l.ease Between Art Center and OwTier Staff Sketch Article in Sailor Newspaper Survey Review of Current Application Applicant seeks a conditional use pennit to allow a school of fine arts in the strucmre located at 2180 North Shore Drive, the former Hill School. Until approximately 1990. the property continued its association with the Art Center providing art and dance instruction. The Institute will provide art instruction for 20-24 full-time smdents. Please review applicant ’s addendum. Exhibit D. As her smdents are all rnamre, she sees no potential for incidents that would dismrb the tranquility of the existing residential neighborhood. Her students will not be parking in the street as she feels there is adequate parking available within the property and the adjacent Art Center parking area. Staff has been advised via her attorney. Mike Hoekstra, that the Art Center has agreed to allow the shared use of the parking facility. Staff has yet to receive written confirmation. Applicant should explain classifi atior o. ...e nstiiute as a non-profit school. If members are not aware, the school has already move 1 to the facility and is in full operation, review E.xhibit R. As applicant ’s addendum notes, she was advised that a conditional use permit for "non-conforming use" was in effect. Review Exhibits I, J and Q. It would be impossible for applicant to meet parking setbacks as set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A). The property is a corner lot and subject to 50’ setback on both the east and the south side. The Engineer has reviewed the proposed parking and has advised there is a need for a median to be installed as shown on his site plan. Exhibit J, defining two curb cuts and two parking areas. He also recommends that parking areas now be paved and each stall designated. There is adequate width for backing out maneuvers with parking stalls adjacent to structure. All stalls meet the required 9’ x 20’. It stalls are to be permanently approved in t.ns setbark. pan of the conditional permit review would require approval of a setback variance for parking. Zoning File ^1^1923 April 15. 1994 Page 3 As per all conditional use penuiis approved in a residential zone, signage would be limited to 12 square feel. Such signage would be allowed to be double-sided. Per the floor plans submitted, E.xhibit E. it appears the applicant proposes no major alterations of the classroom areas. The Building Official has been asked to inspect the facility and to provide further direction concerning any building or fire code concerns. History of Use of the Facility and Land Use Implications In 1989. the An Center determined the need to sell off ilie Hill School for private sale in order to meet cenain financial needs. The Hill School housed the An Center since 1957 and in the early 1970 ’s expanded to the former elementary school to the immediate west. The current owner. Many Schneider, purchased the propeny as shown on survey. Exhibit S. in 1989 after the City approved the metes and bounds division. Prior to the filing of the metes and bounds division, the City received a conditional use permit application from Mr. Schneider seeking duplex use of the structure. The application was withdrawn. During that review, the City received petitions from several neighbors voicing concern that the former Hill School structure would now reven to residential use rather than being part of an art complex. With the approval of the subdivision, the property was now to revert to single family residential use. Soon after the subdivision was complete, Mr. Schneider advi,sed that the Art Center still wished to continue the use of the facility. Mr. Schneider was advised of the need to file a conditional use permit to allow the continuation of that use. Review Exhibits M, N and O. The application (#1487) was filed in January of 1990 but applicant failed to continue with the review. Review Exhibit-P. In September of 1990, both the Art Center and Mr. Schneider terminated their lea.se agreement. Since that time the facility has housed a day care use at a level that would not require a special conditional use permit. The use is a permitted use in a residential zone. Staff was not aware of a dance school being conducted at that facility at the same time. This use should have been authorized under a conditional use permit. Official Status of the Property As Application #1487, the conditional use permit that would have allowed the continued use of the propeny for an and dance instruction, was never completed, the City recognized only the approved residential use or the day care that has been conducted at the facility for the last few years. If a fine arts school is to operate from this facility, a conditional use permit would be required. The informal gravel/parking areas were never removed along the east side of the facility but have continued to serve day care users. The required fencing had been installed along the north and west side of the propeny defining this facility’s parking area as separate from the Minnetonka An Center. Upon a recent inspection, .staff noted the fencing on the west side has been removed. The An Center has relocated a lighting pole within their parking area. The zoning or land use issues for the current review would be the need to approve a conditional Zoning File #1923 April 15. 1994 Page 4 use permit to allow the continuation of art instruction at the tacility and a parking setback variance for parking stalls that do not meet the required 50’ setback. It should also be noted that the facilitv' has been connected to municipal sewer, completed in 1992. Building Officiars Comments The Buildinsi Official shall ask that a licensed architect address the following issues: 1. Handicap access to first level only. 2. Handicap sanitation facilities. 3. Consideration of occupancy requirements and type of construction. 4. Exiting requirements. The Building Official is preparing a written memo outlining in detail all of the general points noted above. The memo will be handed out to the applicant and members of the Planning Commission at your meeting. Planning Commission members are advised that there is an exhibition at the Institute on Sanirday. April 16 between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. The Director of the Institute will be present and she will be able to show members around the facility. If you are unable to make the Sanirday timeline, the Instimte will be open again on Monday during regular hours from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Issues for Consideration 1. Please review the conditional use permit section regarding school use. Does the school of fine arts fall under this classification of use or should this be considered as a conditional use to allow the continuation of a non-conforming use? In reality, the non- conforming use of the facility has continued to present although City did not have a current conditional use permit. In reviewing the exhibits on the former conditional use permit. Application #1487, it was clear that the Planning Commission was ready to recommend approval subject to certain items being provided by both staff and applicant. 2. In light of the limitations in area and parking, should this conditional use permit be limited to a specific number for student enrollment? Zoning File #1923 April 15, 1994 Page 5 Options of Action If denied. Planning Commission members must refer to Section 10.09 on the niees^o ’ findings for conditional use permits and Section 10.03. Subdivision 5. standards tor non- conforming use. OR ADDroval subject to the findings that non-conforming use has been in existence continuous^- since 197“i and that all pertinent standards of the non-conforming use section have b^ers^tUM Bv eranting this current conditional use permit, the City also recognizes the need m gra^ a vtiance for location of off-street parking located within the 50' tront/street ymd^ ThFa approval is based on the finding that this parking area has existed while structure htu been used for educational purposes and that City has found no record ol potential hazards for the users of the adjacent public roadway and that all necessary tindings ot the condttional use pem. sections of the code have been met. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 This conditional use permit shall limit enrollment to 20 - 24 (?) full-time smdents. . AS educational use shall be permanent, the City must ask that all parking areas be paved and median provided at City Engineer ’s request located wiAin the right- of-way of Briar Street. Applicant’s surveyor to provide updated information locating exact location of paved road within Briar Street right-of-way. 3 Applicant shall work closely with building staff to see that all necessaty fire and building code improvements are installed within six months ot the date ot approval of this conditional use permit. Should the City require written confirmation that the Art Center and Institute have agreed to share parking spaces when needed? Should there be a limii placed on the maximum occupancy of stracture during the times of special exhibits or showings? The building code would limtt structure to 100 person occupancy. Should it be less? 4. I CITY OF ORONO •j ■• 1 "‘.7 ^ : ) - GENERAL LAND'USE APPLICATION ' iil i A PROPERTY LOCATION . Site Address zj^e Tvpc of Application to be Filed lAnT Propert)’ Identification Number (P.I.D.) A //7- APPLICANT . y r ^ Name '1a IC±—^-------- Address"iL i)erO0^^^ Atf^ Phone (“home) ^7jT •/f/^ Phone (work) S"2Z ~ Z.J i* ____Zip OW'NER (if different than applicant) Name Sc^MT*^cr\r. Address /2^*T City ii<Al7Jtr4 Phone (home) Phone (work)^2^' inr Zip 5>'5f/ DatePropeffp^cquired______^ururr /7 . L(UnI (do) |^*n^also own the adjawnt parcels of^land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application ______S125.(X3 Residential Accessory Use Y $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______$175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ______$150.00 Duplex CreditiBldg _______$250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.(X) Land Alteration _____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore ______PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ______$1(X).00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) ----------.. .After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$250.00 Vacation ______$175.(X) Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement V^acation With Subdivision ______S3(X).00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Pi. • j^eAJb&ufTMc^ (month/year) rTTV "r nfl'nii'i”Will VI vnuttv r.rrrrr 1 A %/w'V'i-WVW* ,•» t rr^ i 7^yy:nnnnA A fc^w'V<UV'W W OA AAc w* • vv 150.00 200.00 ,it rcw\/A Vi.lfrucrv TiviiwA Ik.OkiTrcT-rUAVi* vnnMUC-4.AI I iiinitA • k.*w S299900 COOl ROl 715:42 03/25/94 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) c .U^oa so. 00 ■00.00 YOU 715:45 '>3/25/94 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 ’ (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SLTPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corrairTolIih best ^ hii^her knowledge. Applicant’s signature ________________Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acl nowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of/lp/v^eafieation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date 25 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building Sl Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \ w r' J ; wn n/tt/H •lATCM 001V. WWO W)00 ' OMCR NAm - TAXPAYCII ' \ > •' NAHE/AODR •' - !••.’♦ V- ■ I ^ I • 5S 10-117-n 53 0002 022^5 NOOTN SHORC OR RIN6SLEY N HURPNY JR RINOSLEY N HURPNY JR 22M NORTH SNORE DR NAYZATA m 55391 i • % '1 •’'m . iVA - . . ; ,r A. ' • , U t • ^ • < ‘ ' . t ^ 1 H' : . • ^ i-. * • HEJtCPlN COUNTY PROPERTY XHfORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (»t€RS LIST ■» ‘h TOTAL iATCN 001 00019 i' REPORT NO, PIA35401 * PAOi t . ’*r; .4- K) % • * k :.V •j« J •: .• ' ■. I ••* ’ ".../'•V • i rrV^;;:- V ' /;*• ■ ^ -‘I • ' ♦ *X * . ‘ . • X . ; * . ' «»• > • • ' J.,. . ' • ■ * > <« ‘ • ■ V i ^ . . ■'■•• V- V - X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RERRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE A»« TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEr#«PIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. 31DATE 9i4iM.y1^ Afi OOxZ) <::.■■■ ;/■■•■»■.. V! r\ •, ' } ^ /a - f » . . * ,• f.. » * * ■ ‘4 ■% ' . • •• i ■ r'V- ■•■ ✓ ♦ k ‘ ■ * / '■■■.■ * L »• ' f • V . .. A- ' ■ t . • *■ .'.•'■.A' ■•^9 • •..»••% V. I4S5401* 2 * V ? . *• •i'f- •..■.•;*• . ..» •'.. • ( I * \i* • • ■■■•.*■.{ ■■■ • • • ■ • * . 7 • .' . , * • .4 ♦ • > ' 4 ■ ; ■;-'v » * *■ . ■ ’ 1 , • • • ■ .■ . J ' . • , • . » . t* - ' . ; 3» • . ; . . ' t • V WP V 4 ? } * » t /; '‘V jr< .■ \ V • ; Jj .' *■ ■ ■. . ■ i-. ; . : •« * V i.,.;.v n*. •l-.-',' ■ •■u-• M i-r.*. V:- • ' .T* « X . •' 4 ■ . * • **,* « t * . V . 4* * • *■ VT . s , -.1. . , \ / f ' , i'. •’; ' •;. ■ 'S. * ■ . ■ •' '-r.t*'' •(«•■ • “• *, ■' '' • . •■■ ■ •. r; . t. ■ ; - VMl .. ’ Atelier Le Sueur Mastei Studio L nititute of REfiBEWTAi:o.NAL AiT 2lW Norm SHO«tDt.OtONO,M?.’55391 (612)473-5%6 Oirec&r Ann«TT« LeSu^uf AdmtssKX^s BartMra A. Coyis Oeveiopmefil Jeffrey Scon Board Directors Patrica Aflar L^nda Coheri Armne leSueur Advisory Board Insifuciors Mary Jane Barnard Gary Chnsienson John Cuningharr* r>ano Haddad David P Jasper George Johnson Don Koestner Richard Lack Mary Lee Rich Colleen Anderson Kim Alleman-Beaty Michael Coyie Stephen G)ertson Jean Grapp Wayne Howreli Mark Johnson Steve Levin Jim Robin»n • Tl c O i\!arch 20. 1994 Dear Jeanne Mabusih, Building & Zoning Adminisiraior, City of Orono, We arc formally requesting that a Conditional Use Permit be granted to Atelier LeSueur Institute, a nonprofit school, presently located at 2180 North Shore Drive in Orono. legally described as: Block 3 Markville. Lot 5 and that part of Lots 4^6 lying East of West 60 Feet thereof. We at Atelier LeSueur Institute are happy to be residing in Orono and would like to continue to operate our fine art school in the future. Wc employ a ‘faculty which includes some of the finest painters in the Classical tradition in the world. Our school is dedicated to the preservation of a tradition that was begun in Seventeenth Century- France; that of Gassical Realist painting. When we agreed to the purchase of this building, we were led to believe that there was an operezhve Non-conforming Conditional Use Permit. Technically the property should have been adopted as a school in 1967 when the Municipal Code was written since tlic property was an elementary public school. Nevertheless there was a conditional use permir « operate the premises as a school when the Minnetonka Art Center owncu uiw twi.uing. Then, during Martin and Andrea Schneider's ownership of the building, there was a performing arts (dance) school housed there until we entered into a purchase agreement. The majority of our students are mature; as our entry demands are quite high, requiring considerable discipline. Consequently we expect no incidents that would disturb the tranquility of our residential neighbortiood. If there was ever a need for overfiow pariting. it could easily be accommodated by a preairangemem with our neighbor, the Minnetonka An Center. And I’m sure that they would appreciate our space for their events. We have instnictcd our student body and staff to refrain from parking on the side of the road - and since we have ample parking for our needs, wc expect to see no violations in this regard. Thank you ever so much, for your earnest consideration of our request. Sincerely, Jeff Scott. Development Anneue LeSueur. Director PS .. You can reach Jeff Scott at 522-2130 fiRyr OlO HtLL Sclt0OL^ 4atoejf Z/ f 9 t>/tnru SU9J9C l>tt 0n'0f^9, A4f^ ^"zl'o" -5-2V-V 522-1557 THE MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ^ ' V Febniary 15, 1994 •a ) rt story artistic table le un- have te rare tpected Annette I^Sueur Atelier LcSueur 2180 North Shore Drive Wayzala, MN 55391 Dear Annette, I want to express my deep gratitude to you and all of the people who came to work at our Family Day last Sunday. All of your efTorts helped make the day a success. Visitors had a wonderful time at the workshop. They loved drawing from the plaster models, but also appreciated the shading exercise that we developed. It was great for them to go up and see Kim hard at work using some of the techmques that they had just learned. I hope that everyone from the Atelier enjoyed themselves as much as the visitors did-we had over 1200 people that day. I ha'/e enclosed a couple of photos that I hope you enjoy. Thanks again for your wonderful contributions. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely Georgie Wade Associate, Public Programs Education Division 1400 Tltird Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 Tel 611/870-3000 Fax 611/870-3004 ART ACTIVITY Noon to 4; JO Hoocloiskal ttlM llff woHithop CUsiioum I ii/l i J, first floor MUSICAL PERFORMANCE 12:10, 1:4$ Mo«l< of th« period played by tho Mlnnojota fei 1:15 Mandolin Orchestra Sculpnire Court, second floor DANCE PERFORMANCE 1:00 b 2: JO Neoclassical dances performed by CapHoi Sculpture Court, second floor DRAWING STUDIO NooA to 4: JO * toth-tontufy dr«wln9 studio brought to o*aaaiAM*« fmfli tWm Atcll^r LftSUCUP VIDEOS lif€ by ftu<l«nts from the Atclter LeSucur Roninda, second flour Ag€ of Reason, Age of Passion Heoclasficism and Romanticism-Realltili Pillsburv Auditonum, second floor EXHIBITION All day Visions of Antiquity; Neoclassical Figure Drawings [)avton Hudson Gallery, second floor Thank you for coming. Please join us for the next Family Day, Imprints. Sunday. March 6, 1994* Family Days are made possible through the support of Grand Metropolitan Food Sector Foundation on behalf of Th« Pilltbury Company, and U $ WIST F^ndation. AddiUonal support is provid«J by The B. C. Carnbl* ft P. W. Skogmo FoundaUon. 1 i r #ur ATELIER LESUER STUDIO OF FINE ART REAUSTIC ART INSTRUCTION liU 10 d-iW. bot yoo do.^1 took f * ooKooaly tospocttd *loli« L.Su«i. Slodu ct Rivo Art oHoc» ch*Wn ^ Doss!w6trai^S^« «« oi r*pr*s«ntalional drawing. Students begin to to see and render^nature accuratety by drawing Irom illustrations of their lavonle slorw^oW master drawings, and directV Uom nature. and pen and mk techniques. They are also taught to develop O'** painSgs after the manner of Englanrfs great book 1880 ‘athrou^ the 1920 ‘s. Lessons are individually designed and class sizes are small SO that each student may progress at h« or her own pace. 1-572*333 Fall Sept. 20-Jan 14 (No classes Oct. 18 - 22. Nov. 22 - 26. Dec 20-31) Winler/Spring Jan. 18 - April 25 (No class Feb. 21 . Apri 4-9) $124 per 13 week 1 ^f2 hour session ^ (1 > ' c::Dt=./h,rawin<t? Atelier Le Sueur Afternoon Classee Mon. 3:30 - 5:00 p.m. Mon. 2:45-4:15p.m. Tues. 4 00 - 5:30 p.m. Tues. 3:30 - 5 00 p.m. Wed. 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. Deephaven MME Minnewashta Groveland Clear Spring w'sWin ©eijQ ........At OanceTECH. the 1993 - 94 dance season offers top training in various types of dance as well as an opportunity to gam poise and confi dence. The instructor. Tracy J. Doheny has taught dance and worked with children and adults for the past 12 years. She uses a positive approach and recognizes each person as an individual.Tracy has studied vanous types of dance over the last 15 years and has named with some of the top instructors in the metropolitan areaThis year DanceTech will offer tap. and ballet, jazz/creative mov«- ment. and creative dance and NEW Ballet technique. 60 min. $92/session 45 mm. $70/S6SSion 30 mm. $52/session Please note; There will be an addi tional lee for the Spring Recital Wed. 4:00 - 5 30 p.m Excelsior Thurs. 3:30 - 5 00 p.m. MMW Fri 4:00-5 30 p.m Scenic Heights Saturday Classes SepL 25 - Oct 30 Sat. 9:00-11:00 am DpEC Sat 11:30-1:30 p.m. DpEC $75 per 6 wreck 2 hour session SESSION 1; SESSION 2: Sept. 13-Jan. 11 (Noclass 10^18 • 10/19.12/20-12/31) Feb. 7 - May 17 (No class 2/21 - 2/22 4 4/4 - 4/5) Recital: May 21 Rehearsal May 19 & 20 Mondays Y500 9 30-10.00 Y501 10:00-1030 Y502 10:30-11:15 Y500 11:15-12:00 Y504 4 15-5:15 New Y506 5 15-6 15 Y506 6:15-7:15 Y507 7.15-6:15 Tuesdays Y385 3.15-4:00 Y386 4 00-4.45 Y387 4.45-5:45 Y388 5:45-6 45 Craatva dance lor boys Creative Dance TatYPre-Ballet Tap/P re-Ballet TafkPre-Ballet Balet Technk|ue(team proper technique, grace 4 strength) Tap& Ballet Jazz/Cieative Creative dance Tap 4 PrebaBat Tap4BaBal Tap 4 BaBat 3.4 & 5yaarolds 3 yaar olds Adv. Beg 4 & Syear okfs Beg. 44 5yearoids' Inlemi. 6.7.8 year olds** 8 4 up Inteirn. 9 4 up** 9 4 up 4 45yearoid Adv. Beg. 4 4 5yrolds* Adv. Beg. 6.7.4 8 yr. olds* Beg. 6.7 4 8 yr. olds. •Students should have computed at laast one session ol tap or balUt. *• Students should have computed tviro years of tap or All classes will be held at Deephaven Ed Center Rm. 21 ★ ★ ★ open House ★ ★ ★ Note- Tracy wll be avaJable to answer questions and accept registrations on ^ Tuesday. September 14 from 6 - 7 p.m. at Deephaven Education Center Rm Call 835-5395 and leave a message for Tracy if you have questions. Minnetonka Public Schools Learning Today for Leading Tomorrow Mav 16, 1991 iwm<b :00 a.m. DpEC ;30 p.m. DpEC 2 hour session 2/20 -12/31) 1-4/5) irolds I 4 & S year old s 5 year olds* y.eyaarolds** &up' Dear Annette, Mark, !-1arie ana ac..e*s. This is a follow-up letter to the AoTtist-In-Residency you completed at our school. V.’e appreciated your efforts and flexibility. Over the years h.ave had many artists vrork with o-ur students, but none were so well received or as effective with the students. They enjoyed the oppor-^ rxnity to draw. Many staff members cemented how effective it was to have two people •^’crkiny together. We are excited about what nattened to ou- stu^-nts and staff. We look forward to the possibiliry to be associated with veur school again next year. Sincerely, (E) Chuck Andrews f old . 4& Syrolds* , 6.7,&8yr.olds* & 6 yr. olds. )t registrations on cation Center Rm. 21 » jestions. Kxceisior FJementarv School r h;irles I.. Andrews Principal (612)474-2564 474-2564 eiinchment experience For 3rt3'-S. r. ret.cier.ee N!ar.e Sc.^j-eme: ara '!arc Johnson, ■A.no spent tnree weeics teaching drav^rr.g to the shicorts at Ex celsior Elementary School, the goal was for each shident to have a successful art exper.er.ee and to binid sKills with which they could move anead on hheir OWTl ".Art -S .rot as mportant a part of the c’urr.c'olum as it used to be." said Schreurer. "but it con- tr.butes to a c.hiid s serae of well-being ana to a se.nse of con fidence and a se.nse of culture " D'urmg their residency, the ar tists met 'X'.th eacn class Lhree times Begu-nung w;tn a irawng demonstrauon. uney showed the sPudents how to use the sight- size method to draw an object Zm ' f f// / . i* ' f V - ' accurately They also shared the pruicipi^ of corTiposition and teenraques of the j^eat masters Vancus exercises helped sradents to tram Lheir eyes to looK at the object and coordmate their eye and' hand, raLher than to simply draw a faminar objec- -- such as a teddy bear — with out looking at it. In some classes the art lessons were mtegrated •A ith other units of study, suen as the 3rd graders who were study- mg dinosaurs and learned to draw them. • We found the srudents at Ex celsior to be absolutely delight- bul/’ said Schreiner. “All or the itudents were successr'ul: the explosion of creauvit>* surpnsed even 'us.'’ • M ; !1 i :->0 ' i' ‘''7? • • * « # -♦ f , - Firvt-c-rader Tajnmv Wcsiermann practiced the sight-size method of draw^ig a dog. as demonstrated by anist m residence .Marc Johnson of the .Atcllicr LeSueur art studio. VINNESGTA S u'EUREAN NEV vSPAPEHS MHINETOflKA > ■'-•r 4V-' V I « * -■i'^ 1- .V‘ •> ---*r -*■ .%• -- yr**"••-H- %--'■- i t w ■► - .-'T :^lr Nli^r i •>< Hopkim uit4i » hrrtk fnini pHinune He % ««o< ot ihnp* inMrifciur^ «i U»c >».h«iui. (itnita t>» < r l^vsiK'w AS J» : • - -S V f: i. . I-'.. ■■ ' ;;■! r*t * t yj-, ■ * \hirti »<ur auiSrni NUr* Vnr» ty( l^hoxiie .« mn .nl pMUmruz. usu« the ••«cni-«/r * mrthnd Hr«ot». »ii l?»r gt^an u>eU h* fi»viiminii \aut»«*ms I roifung '•rth oM-% and pn^-rrOs U» pi>riraiL% and iria^mao pMuumt^ iJ*h(a«iR h% ( r^ig 1 4 i Atelier j( ( n«ti iM«nr I ^ >U»** -4 %' Lh***’ J M»! i V< ■ I r >;>*•.if • .r‘r~- i-av i rt*am -.<mw*t?uf4C >•» J ^•— Hi ,ii » '< H'<4..fKi ■*•>*» !H ir. ner i-:a*n.*i \rBr a's oi > fju* umr ^n. iaT-*5 j*'.^nnpd txfwr ara v r>» » ! snr s»xd eav^ rr.e enm^u> srf va J -i '»i ^ i ntxpjr LrtTN tiiir 1 trr»vf! > 4 rv •I'-r »'^'4t*r Vl.ii iiJ^ •’Mi >4»*U-«^ iW’«'^»M:ni? ui >i» tXMJTs ;4>r*.:.i irruu "-»r^ a ar««^r *.nr rr.j'.!!^ ■J- .’.a.N •..."»»' sruiip^l n»a *•’ ' •>i;.<ts LT»r OiMTiPioW and sml JlS •wild l,rMr. s vn\»w\« i-V vncfcH sinc9 it jpmru ji Lu'^imot n..Tr \i»;tn( Ago ! as a stuomU. and as an mstna tor Ur »: rv tnm *-*w* uwis to go tm arw >> A'wirvr*' gjid aJ ;vt;r';ng !' • aar i nuiMCia'; va.«i V* in«* r4*an in»- vra;rang >J^ rr.tjq\i«k trwt^ e-** j;stna »*.*r".tng i*' om* u'-.e trt muqvn* fV 5;^: ifvi r;;nK*rs j \4M* .1 iuTvio And ine canvas ar»* SJd^ftv sjije artisi -u:xis se\rn: m rrc*ruuv m;ies ine .••m'3i*^;L;tir. r •ovar’j a.'v.l fT-.a«x> LV* i-invas T”':»* ;;r’afsh r»*•.**.» ?*sr •';^nur«is ct ‘..ft.rt* • ,,>-f .Mf'' tov-ratt .natfirun patptm^v *•'. '1 r»'.i-irv*'>iv iv?» I! irvag'-iVirv vpnes '4t»u.n«^ vt j aif r»-: i r*^t tnr aiitk l- painu^J atul il car: U4«* rr. *r,i.ns or v»».in- ’..* uniMi ‘ IS 3K>metftifV nr>i vt xiv an*l i*.'. :’ 'n - - rr-p*/Tir.g •■ irvrr'v '> navp t.» di» Tn*» sriKlio art*a 4>ti !tae lc»p fitjur oi ►Acrisu»r ♦ •mununit' '. • 'VPr > Aith t’PwLsnes t-ag> anil t?M* 'iin*'r parapn^maiia «'i art aful UHr s.T.eu ol v! ;wu':i .if'.g ’*P* 1 omp«el*d aorxs fwng iwi nrartv •f\pr> i^aii and m*xt l.t si-d^nLs ea*’«'ts >)rip vkiHK-v in t fiaiv uuMoe domi ^ Hi gpt to me :»*ir 1 Anere v<iu jjn t maae a cniicai nslK nert it s «o larr.aLar ^iid lipvin >»j vtiu rung it u(a»uir limn *>r n»v at :t '.n me mim^ A ;m me punned remode'ing <»t t-lvceisKif i ofnnmnit' * enter iftu> etenienLarv m n<«n ivcsst'*>«'n> me aU‘uer auJ U^e its r.«'me m*.s summer V searv.n us under aa> tor a neu nmklimi. ana next mmitn a sn<nfc vim feature me ixonus oi students m sirui'tors and <nnen* ivm' puint s tre stvie «»i Xcadeniic Im presAiontsm me sivie oi ar. Uugni in me aienef Ae re going to have ihe largest s.’v'a e\p»^ rii-id ik ,\caiK‘trur I'rpressiorasm vie m;r.K lit tlte t. ni eo. .Mate- s.iiil la=>ueur. ATH) -j-aces ner 'roir.irv •.> an antst :>atx aiong a master to jxjpu tine m.jf fventuatiV :»*a>ls to f”"enc"i fxiinter Jaon*es L avid l7t» l»Cb TTiere x ciassicai music imj r»»‘g r roil tihe said In our cuttuie noth are rtwistdered vaiuatie 'Ae rc rrt»J«*m iwxHue ann rv.ixjem ideas stiwnes 1 aani I' lam at«*ut I :eei can rw-st tv ♦'U\'>*s>ed through realism t\vjrempt»rar»- ^4<jt <cs .w U*a<#em;c l:nvns>s,toniMs mii he head tnym J lo 6 p m .\jturru\ anti Mi/xiav Afav 16-17 on the Curd nitar o4 tlxcriMor Community CtnUf Aanuxuvn is trr<e 1 il ■' •? ■'* t , >. --er- •r r- >\ ^ < cue liaiUeil* •>< f vi-rtuKr fvir. hem • via«irni l«'c »e»r> >t»e m»'*eo li* f.xtrtsee fr^eti t l#in» i*i siU4i« »t liir «f»"4 t»* • r4ig laxMg' I krmioc n-s oaop' ' •- EXCELSIOR • SHOREWOOD SuirSail N«w»sUmd Pnc# April 22, 1992 I C' r- ........ ? - -rl •». ::; 'C s ^ § Ju Holniyd oT F4ma. j siudnil at Aidier U.Sucur in v %»4ifi«ed %»ith a single liizht snurcr in a darkened studio at thr umM. StudefitN oari .neir tranais b% making chairoal dra»*uup 5 o%er ^r>er«i 'Oirs leam more adramed techniques. d*hoto bi Cnug Lavsqy Modern story, old style Excelsior an school tries to preserv'e traditions of old masters Rv MjlUiev^ Zlatnik Ot^ra or .MT\”’ Tlien? s rnoft: that, one way to tell a story, an. some uH»>ple UuTJC the Old wa>^ are Or if not best, t^kin at lea^l worth presemng 711*11 s what happens at Atelier Le5ueur a ^hool for artists based in the Exceisior Community Center A^pinng artists spend up to seven years learning to draw and paint, wonung wnih instructors to develop the style of it^xentury European masters This IS one of the last schools left in the world for this kind of artwork. ’ said founder and director Annette LeSuetir “\Miat we re pnmding is an eve. which you can l get out of a book. The school is modeied after Pans^iased studioR oi the Late IStiis. w here apprentices would study for years with a master “Whai we're providing is an eye, which you can't get out of a book. ” — Annenc LcSucur hkindci. Atelier Lebueur Atelier.“ < pronounced ah tell veh is French for 'workshop l>.r school tne*- to recapture the spinl of the old worKshope,. said Lehueur. with 8-10 students working eJowiy with the ms true tor. AVe try to have ah atmosphere mat o conducive to people ATEUER: To page b\ Atelier I students tradition In the Ate a week. I studio-Cl portrait p. drawing I W assignme ing, pers Graduate advanced instructor are giver necessar\ Students a “sight-sizt. natural si/ are placed to observe vertical lin Van Rijn ; Atelier LeSueur is dedicated to giving students the best possible training in the art of representational drawing and painting. It is modeled after the studio schools of nineteenth century France. •r The Atelier or studio system was developed during the seven teenth century as a modification of the older apprenticeship system. It reached its apex in nineteenth century France and has proven to be one of the most effective means of teaching painters. In this system, students progress at their ow n rates through a series of graduated exercises w hich develop their abilit y to render nature accuraielv. The student-instructor ratio is kept very small (twelve students per instructor). This enables the instructor to give optimum attention to each student and to tailor the instruction to meet the needs of the individual. It provides for maximum development of individual creativity, ensuring that each student learns the methods necessary to paint successful pictures. miA Cast Drawing Ron Arthaud, first year student X I Interim Stephi The instructors a the Atelier systei French academit fact, they are par in an unbroken ci tury French pai training the instr ability to see anc similar to that o: claim such a he: .\t a time when tational painting last vital links ii Y IS'i. *■ ■ //‘ frsr A > 7/1' imcE U' * I LeSueur . trained in )f both the sionists. In raced back teenth cen- ise of this cudenis the y and skill artists can represen- one of the Atelier LeSueur offers a full-time, f-;, students interested in the serious and intense sludv traditional dnming and paintinji. In the Atelier program, students vs ork eight hours a day five da^ys a week. Half of the student's day is spent workin,- studio - cubieles w here they progress through east portrait painting The remaining halt day is '" 'he ^avvina or paintme from the human tigure, eekly leeturvs . ml assignments are given in eomposition. anatomy, memory draw ■ inii, perspective, and art history. Graduates of this program may continue their advanced Atelier program in which the ratio instructor is rrore limited (four students per instructor), h'udc ^ are mven the opportunity to develop the additional skills ^ecetL^y to do c^unple.v interiors and imaginative paintings. i A -\m Students are taueht to obtain accurate proportions by using the ■■siaht-size" method. When drawing still-', fe objects at their natural size, as in the e.vample above, the still file and canvas am pll-ed side bv side. The student stands si.v to eight leet away m observe the measurements through the use ot horizontal and venutal lines. This method was used by such anisLs as Rembrandt Van Rijn and John Singer Sargent. Adult part-»ime courses are offered to students with or without experience who would like to improve their draw ing and painting skills. Many of the school ’s full-time students began in the part-time program. Others choose to maintain their part-time status, melding their art studies with career and family. The same skills taught in the full-time program can be learned in the part-time courses over a longer period. a i ^ A. ‘V ' -Ver #V Pen and Ink study after Arthur Rackham Marc Johnson, first year student A part-time program for gifted young students is also offered. This program (ages four through eighteen) is designed to cultivate the special potential which many students seem to have at an early age. The young students are trained in pencil, watercolor. and pen and ink techniques . They are taught to develop their ow n imaginative paintings after the manner of England ’s great book illustrators of the ISSO’s throuiih 1920 ’s. For more information concerning Atelier LeSueur urite or call: Annette LeSueur Director of Af"l*er LeSueur 3565 Deephaven .Avenue Wavzata. .Minnesota 55391 (6li) 475-1814 • Annette LeSueur received her art training from Richard Lack at Atelier Lack in Minneapolis, MN. Richard Lack was trained by R.H. Ives Gammell who in turn studied with William Paxton William Paxton was trained by the nineteenth century' French painter Jean-Leon Gerome. LINDA ANN COHEN ‘ ' ftprrsf^a P?ycff0.^ocfSt y Home Address 2402 O^Klfind Poed Minnetonio. MN 55343 Phone: (612) 544-iqi7 Office Address Butler Square--Suite 529-B 100 North 6lh 5t limneaDolis, MN 55403 Phone; (612) 332-7621 EDUCATION:Wellesley College - B.A. 1958 Honors in Chemistry ^hi Beta Kaopa (Junior Year) Sigma Xi (for science achievement) Durante Scholar (for highest academic achievement) Woodrow Wilson Notional Fellowship Winner for graduate study at Harvard Harvard University - work toward a Masters 1958-59 M A I960 History of Science Bush Summer Fellowship Winner, summer 1980 Complete Masters and seminar in organizational development at Harvard University of Minnesota - Pegan in 1963 Doctoral program in Educational Psychology--ernphasis; group process, organizational development, family systems and learning styles M.A. Educational Psychology 1985 Ph.D. Educational Psychology 1986 (4.0 average) Division of Counseling Psychology: CSPP Licensed Psychologist - June 1966 Licensed Consulting Psychologist - June 1968 WORK: TCF Banking and Savings Consultant Henry High Partnership Project Private Practice of Psychology 1988-89 1988-89 Blake Middle School Interim Director 1987 Assistant Director 1977-88 Social Services Clinic Counselor/therapist (individual, couple, family end group therapy) 1984-80 The Blake School Senior Administrative Team Member Professional and Personal 1977-88 Growth Task Force Chair Philosophy-Objectives Com 1986-87 mittee Chair 1985 K-12 Computer Coordinator 1981-83 Curriculum/Goals Committee 1965 Blake Middle School Mathematics teacher 1974-77 Head of Math Department 1974-77 Highcroft Country Day Math and Science teacher 1973-74(junior high level) Summit School-St Paul Math teacher 1959-62 Head of Math Department (junior and senior high) 1959-62 Harvard University Teaching Assistant 1959 (core curriculum, natural science) VOLUNTEER WORK:Chair, Glen Lake County Home School Project Sponsored by Junior Leage. University of Min nesota Center for Youth Research and Devel opment and Hennepin County Court Services. Supervised placement, training, and service of 55 volunteers in cottages and school of the juvenile delinquency institution Also worked as volunteer in boys ’ cottage and in school math class (1968-70) 1969-70 FAMILY HOBDIES: Teacher of Enrichment Course for Gifted Students Sunset Hill Elementary School. Wayzata Spoke on panel-Minnesota Council for the Gifted Treasurer. Minneapolis Junior League Board MemPer (Education Chair, PuPlic Affairs Chair) and National Conference Delegate. Junior League Board MemPer. Minneapolis UrPan League Secretary. Board Mpls. Children ’s Hospital Participant monthly seminar- Center for Youth Research and Development. Univ of Minnesota President. Mpls.-St. Paul Wellesley Club Extra-curricular Activities- Wellesley College Class Officer, Sophomore Year President, Junior Class Vice-president of College Government, Senior Year Husband: Henry W. Cohen, physician (Married 1959) Executive Health Program, Park-Nicollet Clinic Children: Laura, age 27 Andrew, age 25 Will, age 22 1972-73 1972-74 1970-72 1971-73 1967-60 1969-75 1964-66 Tennis- ranked in top 10 NWTA, Women s 35 Singles (1981 -88) Jogging- ran Grandma ’s marathon 1979 Knitting- to keep calm! F;::jni!; oi- piMr if?ir. ALLAf': ItHl 'C: ( •.VI'; rCIA DATE )f 'VCrTH: MAR.: T M.. :,;::Arij">- 1 -LLAM '4 %::> r I•. 'i, TW' <:h i ] • Iren .inr.r-F; SA ^ P‘ : : A i ' ^ ’,■! BO !:-t -'•1 h Da -' KoaJ : ; i ...i, I.; m: , i'liiinc^ ,r< SB ■ :h i fEHi i I z I r: .V :h t mg pRor t.: bb i ohai . PDUC A Vli.J! i. tl. ’.,v: ivOi' I.K..I :i> 3 sou 'ir i I.IGH SCi IGOL M l ont? Ap>:) I i .•>, Nir.i ir?*50 1 x I’.B. !jr xduox'e i.97.l H! l i:VEP;>T rv ni “ MIN! lECO I O ! Ity^i <;;.x I. EiImccx tion K -Ei!:, Child Pi:»ych<;)lo*:|y Einpha«»ir3 I I.1.l ine o t C I.«a te Co<;u:;li in • j Cer ti f i ca to;? h,. A. Di.’qr ee • Gradua (.ed Decernbei", 197'I.i UMtTED .>rAi EG PROFESSXOMAL TENNIS A'>S0C1A J ION i:ER TIP TEA! ICN ■ P90EE9BIGNAL 1 LEVEL ■'•I'lY, ,i.9B0 4!iT<K EXPER T I: nwiudv riMT) ! REr>.n>i:;:!'ir : t, I a :. ! xi- rcTin i.a Seivicos, Inc- W.i lI i-'M cn i' i t.n and Racquet Club M i. n n e • < ;•: ■ I’I 1.11 n e :i; o ' •» n' ) ! k I ii Aj) i o !M 11> I-Rc.i- r;;3s ;i ghai . U 1,11 i'S ten E i i-.ne';; ;;i and Racquet Club } v"19e.'> E>S31 STANT TT ' il IIS PliOEESS IGMAL Wi 11 I.<;i ton E j Inca n xnd Racquet Club ■9SO~ 1.902 MEAD rEMl!I3 f::OAf:il St« Loui...;. Pai- I- Hiqh School 19:’7-■!.'■> 02 IRrMIK AN?) FTi::;Li) CIOOCM I. - I. .;>u I ti !“• vi I' I. I I11| 11 3.:: | ,<70 | 19 7 <V- 1901 JW*- *1 • * Robert w. Laird Assistant Dean The Graduate School Brigham Young University i^ugust 26, 1976 i n Annette LeSueur Hathaway 3853 Grand Ave South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 Dear Mrs. Hathaway: On your request this letter s furnished as evidence that you have completed all requirements for the Master of Fine Arts De gree, with a major in Painting and Sculpture in the Department of Art and Design, and a minor in Design, at Brigham Young Univer' sity. Your diploma was awarded during Summer Commencement, 13 August 1976. Sincerely, Robert W. Laird Assistant Dean RWL:bk B-336 ASB. Brigham Young University Provo. Utah 84602 (301) 374-1211. Extension 4091 r ; i .Artist’s Biography 7 ^ v: r: •* '. V LeSueur .Associates -***.«^ Name STEPHEN GJERTSON Bom Study Mav 21, 1949 ATELIER LACK, Minneapolis, MN., 1971-75; SCHOOL OF ASSOCIATED ARTS, St. Paul, MN., 1970-71 L'NTA'ERSIT:' OF MINNESOTA, 1967-70. Work in Public Collections Exhibitions Teaching Positions Awards Farmers N’a;:cr.al Bank, St. Paul, MN.; College or St. Benedict, St. Joseph. MN.; L’ruted Church or' Ch.nst, Sandstone, MN. Commissions Tr.orvch, .Nokomis Heichts Lutheran Church, Minneapolis. MN * 0 W Acudcmc Dio/ogire, The Minneapolis Institute or Arts, 1990-91; The Annual ASCR Fall Salon. Gabberts .Art Gallery, Edina, MN, 1988, 1989 k 1990; C.’^sicai Reab^m • A Tradition Conrinues. The Red Wing Arts Center, 1990; C.'iiSiCiil RealiS'n - VVer*:s or. Paper. Spxiedboat Gallery, St. Paul, MN, 1989; Fresdorr's Li^ht. Carlson Center, .Minnetonka, .MN 1989; The Boston School: .4 Tradition Continues, Ruthven Gallery, Lancaster, OH., 19SS, Stxfo-Fourth .-.v'ol Salon, Spnng>nlle Museum of .Art, Spring>-ille, b’T, 1953; Sixty-Third .4r- ; • *’on, Spnng\nlle .Museum of .Art, Spnngville, LT, 1987; The Atelier Tradition, Gabberts .Art Gallery, Edina, MN, 1986; Realisrn tn Rrooluiicn, Kentage .Art Gallery, .Alexandna, VA., 1986; The .Atelier Tradition, Paul VVhimey Larson Gallery, St. Paul Campus, University of Minnesota, 1985; The Atelier Tradition, Painting, Prints & Drawings of Minnesota's Premier Realists, The Master Framers Gallery, St. Paul, MN., 1984; The Boston Painters: America's Premier Realists, Andrew Art Gallery, Addison, TX., 1983; The Painters of Light, Bayme Yancy Galienes, Dallas, TX., 1983; Classical Realism - The Other Twentieth Century, Springville Museum of Art, Spnngville, LT., .Amarillo .Art Center, Amanllo, TX, Maryhill Museum of Art, Goldendale, WA„ 1982-83; Third Guild Invitational, Minnetonka Center of Arts k Education, 1980; Jury Show for .Minnesota .Artists, Mirmetonka Center of Arts, 1978; Solo Show. .Minnetonka Art Center, 1977; Second Guild Invitational, Minneapolis, MN, 1977; First Annual Guild Invitational, Minneapolis, .VtN., 1976. ATELIER LeSL'EL’R, Present ATTLIER NORTI-I, 1985 - Present ATELIER L.ACX, Minneapolis. MN., 1973-88; .MINNETONKA CE.NTER OF ARTS i EDUCATION, .VtN., 1975-79; MINNESOTA .MUSEUM OF ART SCHOOL, St. Paul, MN., 1973-74. Three Grants: The Elizabeth T. Greenshields .Memonal Foundation, .Montreal, Canada; Director's Awards and Cash Award, .National April Salons, Springville Musou.m. LeSueur Associates, Artist's Biography Stephen Gjertson Bibliography Publications Prints "Painting Classical Still Lifes" by Kurt Anderson, The Artists Magazine, 1990; "The Academic Dialogue" by Jim Billings, Arts, 1990; "The Academic Dialogue" by Tim Iverson, Exh.Cat., 1990; "Postmodern Pamnng", The Utne Reader, July/August. 1989; "Amencan References: A Survey of Leading Coniempioraries", UTu's Who in Arr.ericun Art; "An Interview with Stephen Gjertson" by Kurt Anderson, Classical Realism Quarterly, Fall 19S8; Sixty-Fourth National April Salon, Springville Museum of Art, Exh.Cat., 19SS; Sixty-Third .April Salon, Spnngville .Museum of Art, Exh. Cat., 1987; Stephen Gjertson, Creating a Joyous Beauty" by Carole Katchen, Painting Faces &■ Figures, Watson Guptill, 1986; "Church Painting L'nveiied" by Doug Trouten, Ttinn Cities Christian, Sept. 1986; "Classic .Artist Puts Beliefs on Canvas" by John Camp, St. Paul Pioneer Press, November 4, 1934; "Stephen Gjertson" by .Annette Hathaway, .American Artist, October 1983; "I Like the Stuff this .Artist if Produang ' by Dave Wood, Grif, Sept., 1983; "You Just Don't Dash Off a Work of Classical Realism Overnight" by Dave Wood, .\iinneapoli< Start Sr Tribune, July 30, 1983; Classical REalism; The Other Twentieth Gentry, Exh. Cat, 1982-83; "Is It Radical to Paint Like Rembrandt?" by Carol Pine, Tvin Cities .V.aga^.ne, July 1983, The Boston Painters - .America's Premier Realists, Exh.Cat., 1983. "Perception and Beauty", .Amencan .Arts Quarterly, Winter 1990; 'Truth to .Nature", .Amencan .Arts Quarterly, Fall 1989; "The Foundation of Harmony", American Arts Quarterly, Surrimer 1989; .Art and the Sacred", Amencan Arts Quarterly, Spring 19*89; "The .Necessity of Excellence", Realism in Revolution, Taylor Publishing, 1985; "Frontiers of Enchantment - The Outdoor Studies of William R. Leigh", Classical Realism Quarterly, January 1991; "In Response to the .Man with the Camera", Classical Realism Quarterly, Jan. 1991; "Hippolyte Flandnn - .A Personal Appreciation", Classical Realism Quarterly, Spring 1987: "Gerome ibook review). Classical Realism Quarterly, Spring 1987; Associate Editor, Classical Realism Quarterly, author: "The Noblest Art", Classical Realism Quarterly. Fall, 1985. WINTER TABLE, limited edition; CARNATIONS AND FRUIT, limited edition; PEACE, BE STILL, open edition; THE RECORDER LESSON, limited edition; .MARA.N.ATHA!, limited edition. Media Address Oil, Pencil, Chalk. 3855 Colfax Avenue .North, Minneacolis, M.N 55412. Artist's Biography LeSucur Associates N Name Bom Study Exhibitions Awards Media Address STEVEN J. LEVIN Mav 3, 1964 ATELIER LeSUEUR, Excelsior, MN, 19S3-89; MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN, Minneapolis, MN, T9S2-83. American Artists Professional League, New York, NY, 1991; Solo, Meadow Creek Gallery, Edina, MN, 1991; New Mexico Art Leaque, 20th Annual, Juan Tabo, NM, 1991; The Academic Dialogue, Minneapolis Institute of Arts, 1990,1991; The Annual ASCR Fall Salon, Gabberts Art Gallery, Edina, MN, 1989, 1990; Classical Realism - A Tradition Continues, Red Wing Art Center, Red Wing, MN, 1990. Classical Realism, - Worl:s on Paper, Speedboat Gallerv, St. Paul, MN, 19S9; Freedom's Light, Carlson Center, Minnetonka, .\1N, 19S9. Teaching ATELIER LeSUEUR, Excelsior, MN, 1988-Present. Positions Second Prize, Masters Division, New Mexico Art League, 1991 Oil 400 Saratoga Lane, Plymouth, MN 55441. ' { ! 1 ( I r Artist's Biography LeSucux Associates Name Bom Study Exhibitions Teaching Positions Media MICHAEL F. COYLE Mav 25, 1951 ATELIER LACK , Advanced Program, Minneapolis, MN, 1986-8/; atelier lack , Minneapolis, MN, 1980-84; mSx EAPOLIS college of art & DESIGN, Minneapolis, MN 1971-72 The Annual ASCR Fall Salon, Gabberts Art Gallery, Edina, MN, 1988- 89-90; Classical Realism - Works on Paper, Speedboat Gallery, St. Paul, MN, 1989* Freedom’s Light, Carlson Center, Minnetonka, MN, 1989; The Boston School-A Tradition Continues. Ruthven Gallery, Lancaster, OH 1988* The Atelier Tradition, Gabberts Art Gallery, Edina, MN, The Atelier Tradition. Paul Whitney Larson Gallery, St. Paul Campus, University of Minnesota, 1986. vrxr iqq - Honeytvell Exhibition, Honeywell Gallery, Minneapolis, MN, 198o. ATELIER LACK, Evening Program, 1986-91; L'NIVERSITY OF MC\'NESOTA, St. Paul, MN, 1985; atelier LeSUEUR, Excelsior, Minnesota, 1985-Present; ATELIER NORTH, Summer Landscape Program, Two Harbors, MN, 1987-Present Oil, Pencil, Chalk, Pastel Address 1301 Highway 7 # 24, Hopkins, MN 44343. ^—-Artist's Biography LcSucur ;\ssociates Name Bom Study RICHARD F. LACK March 26, 192S W'^’^-EAPOUS SCHOOL OF ART. if Maryhil! Museu.Ti of Art, Mar>-hills, WA; Xc-.vark Museum of Art .Vewark VI- Collection, Montreal, Canada; Minnesota Histoncal ^det>-, St.' plul. Commissions Exhibitions 1'- Ai>de.-son, MiAPearoLs, MN’- K«?h P ,.er.pedy Jr„ Hyannispen, MA; Lady D,ar.a W.lmot, London, Eneiand i'.e .J.ciic-rrrrc Diilj^ue. The Minneapolis Insutute of .Arts, 1990-91- Gabberts .Art Gallery, Edina, .MN, 1938, 19S9 i 1990- C.-ssz.a. .^^3 :5~ - a T'3J:t:cn ^jr.r.r.uis. The Red Wing Art Center 1090- Galler>', St. Paul, MN, 1959;' Carl:>on Center, Minnetonka, MX, 19S9; ^0^ Re:r:srec:ive. Mai^ hill Museum or Art, Coldendale, WA 19^S- i M Bosten School: A Tradition r- n r' -r-v F'u^-h J-r-; s,'--. c n' Tf Gallery, Lancaster, OH, 19S8; c.vj - _SpnngttIle Museum of Art, Sonne^/ille, UT N55- -..-.w >alon. bpnng^-iile Museum of .Art, Spnngville, LT 198^' r.e . .e.ier : radition, Gabberts .Art Gallery, Edina, .MN, 1986- Rafi-:sm :n Rr.-olution. Hentage .Art Gallcr>-. .Alexandria, Va', 1986- 1 A.ei'.er Trcuiiion, Paul VSTutnev Larson Gallery Paul r ’ t- - Minnesota. 1986; ' Gallery, St. Paul Campus, Lmversity of JtofeSu. 1^“''' ='■ >-~versi.y of Tne^3cuon ^ ^ Tht Pmle^ of Ught. Bayne Yancy Gallenes, Dallas, TX 1983- Goldendaie, WA, 1982-85; ' * nianllo, T2<., aMaryhil Museum or Art, Minnetonka Center of Arts and Education 1980- lury sho^ Minnesota Artists, .Minnetonka Center of Arts 1978 ' Solo bhow. Minnetonka Art Center, 1977; ' Sjeond Guild Invitational, Minneapolis, .MN, 1977; tirst Annual Guild Invitational, .Minneapolis, .Mn' 1976- Solo, Sandusky Art Center, Sandusky, OH, 1976;' io 0, Bngham Young University, Provo, Ut 1975- Solo, College of St. Thomas, St. Paul, .M.V, 1975- >olo. Lafayette Club, Minnetonka Beach, .Minnetonka MN 1974- Solo St L0U.S Park Medical Center, St. Louis Park, ^!V973 c 1°' Center, Ogunquit, .ME, 1971; wo <7, Oshkosh Museum of Fine Art, Oshkos. WI, 1968- Solo, Concord Art Association, Concord, .MA, 1976- solo, .Mar>-hill .Museum of Art, .Marvhill, W.A, 1963-66 r .Artist's Biography, LeSueur .Associates RICHARD LACK Teaching Positions Awards Bibliography Publications Prints Media Address .ATELIER LACK, Founder, 1969-present. VESPER GEORGE SCHOOL OF ART, Boston, MA Three Scholarships from the Elizabeth T. Greenshields Memorial Foundation; John F. and Anna Lee Stacey Scholarship Grant; Gold Medal, .Amencan .Artists Professional League, 196^; Dole NlemonaJ Prize, Best Portrait, 19/(^/l, Honorable mentioti. North Short Artists Association, 1957; Copley Society First Prize Jurors .Awards, 1960; First Pnze, Ogunquit .Art Center, 1957; Medal, Jordan Marsh, Boston, .M.A., 19k. ■•.An Inter%new with Richard Lack", by Kurt Anderson, Cl^issic^l Realism Quarterly, Winter 1989. ".Atelier Lack: Heirs to Michaelangelo", by David Matheny, Minr.espolis Star if Tribune, April, 19S9; "Is it Radical to Faint like Rembrandt?", by Carol Pine, Tu.'in Cities Magazine, July, 1983; ".Artists Taught Realism in Studio School Atmosphere", by Gareth Hiebert, St. Paul Picr£er Press, September, 1976; "Richard Lack's .Atelier System of Training Painters", by Don Jardine, American Artist Magazine, June, 1971. On the Training of Painters unth Notes on the Atelier Program, .Author/Publisher; Realism in Revoiuticn, .Author/Editor; Classical Realism Qua'terlv, Founder, .Author/Editor of num.erous articles. Posters, open edition; 4 Sailboats - Puerto Vallarta, Heritage Gallery, Alexandria, VA. Return of Ulysses, Trammel Crow Companies, .Minneapolis, MN Oil, Pastel, Etching. 5627 Louis Avenue, Miiv'etonka, MN, 55345. r Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Oro G Bonevoo «C30« W PE • jQ^esf^ C PE Mjrvrin L Soo.J«J P£ E Turner, P£ Ge^ P Cx>k PE T^omJl £ PE fJcor^ G St''ur^<'n. PE Swvm M £Denm C P A •Se»^ Ccx>vj«jni Engineers & Architects MowbjiC A Sjr^ PE ne<h A Oo^Gon PE «ooen P P>^» P£ W Posrer PE D^n3 O ^E Booerr C Puviet a a je* y A Bourcton P£ V»4l-'ii A M^mvX' PE ^ PE >t2 c »E 7>xy*^ P -Anoe^^ A i A Oon^ C BufQMOi PE Thort^s E Angul PE -'vnje* Vj't'Tvr PE P Pxi PE P^itc J Py*^ PE Agnes M Peig A iC P Tnomjt W f^rencr PE MiChaei C tyncr PE James p Ma>ano p £ Jerry 0 Pertrich P£ itennetn P Anaenon PE Mart p PbPv PE Marfc A Se-0 PE Gary Monen P£ Oan^ J Eagertor p £ Atjn P«* Sc^<nt3t PE P^iip J Cas.M^ PE Ma*! 0 aa»s PE Vi«es B Jf^sen P£ L Phi«tj Gavei « PE t>en c We^Tsen PE Gary O t/ ucytz PE f Tooo Poster P£ iteth P '^aoa pe Ocx>)ias J Benoc PE Srsaytn O Gustafson P£ Cecio c>\'er PE Charles A £<^KfciCn Leo M Pjyye»s*v Hanan M Odon James P £r>ge*ha»oi April 4, 1994 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 rAPR" 5 1994 Re: Arts Center File No. 139-1923 r-—- , — Dear Jeanne, We have icviewed the surv’ey prepared for the Arts Center of Minnesota by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. The property is located at the Northwest comer of Briar Street and North Shore Drive (County Road No. 51). We have several comments in regards to engineering matters. The entire parking lot as well as the adjacent streets must be delineated on the survey. Due to the intensified use proposed for the building, we recommend that the gravel parking lot be paved. The parking should be confined on the property by a median, as shown on the attached sketch. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC, i).)^Ubunn Shawn D Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MIM 55113 • 612-636-4600 r U—i-n -T -rn 1 1 1 1 I ' l l1 1 1 1 LL--n< 1 —jU?_ u ' 1 1 I I I I I . ; 1^' 1% ^ r.T 106.00 ORAVS area 1 ■[ T ■ z r V, I ..ivj ..11 I I ww PROOF PPARte:lN^~v _ \ \ \ lo .aW \l I____ • u 4‘ M<OC >lOtWAI 60 4^ CoM^- -o C\J £XI4T»M4Tgmt^ii cocikr • % WOOD QLD4. v_ 5.0 69 00 ~ ■ I ^ ■ jgiBaBBSs^s=ssssM ^ ^rwe: ----N90*00'00"W 175.00--- (CO. R^.San. Se<aen tas€/mat pn' O0C- A/#. /J02 99J /• ^*rr»- Waf/0 CmnfrmlC*^^ Corn€f CjO>^'^ Lot* ^ -'O, '7' //*7. C. J i.f-l jf ( - M > i"t! SW.f.rriy ;<vA'<• *: ■». Aii'S r^-.'s^ ; « r>^^*V;ir -VV s .• » » ».T&'ih'Cit> of ORONO'Wm RESOLUTION OF THE Ci COUNCIL NO -• • * A RSSOLOTION APPROVING A Krr!S AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OP A !iOT LINK RJBARRANGKMENT POR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2180/2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE FILE NO. 1397 WREREAS, the City of Orono :s a nunicipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota: and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") har. adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe developnent of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line r»*arrangement by the Art Center of Minnesota (hereinafter "the subdivider") of properties legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREA^ ‘ivider has completed all requirements of the City for a metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purpor.es. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot lino rearrangement for the Art Center of Minnesota as shown on the Certificate of Survey Paul A* Johnson of McCombs, Pran)^, Roos Associates, Inc. revised May 23, 1989 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council, the subdivider shall apply to the City for the legal conbination for tax purposes of the following properties as described in the above referenced survey of the metes and bounds division of the lot line rearrangement: Parcel A to be combined wirh Parcel 3 Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D Page 1 of 3 wtm -’'.VvTV ^ jj ? r uI s i I,m yjiri^ 2. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the conversion of the existing school structure to a single family residence on conbined Parcels A and 3, the property must be connected to r.unicipal sewer. 3. All new construction on the newly created parcels must meet the setbae'e standards of the RH-IB zoning district and all other pertinent sections of the Orono toning Code. 4. Parking for the Art Center on combined Parcels C and D are h reby approved as amended on the official s te plan app:cv,-c by the City Council with this subdivision application and that based on staff's amendment to the plan# the total number of stalls approved and provided with thin review remain at 62 stalls. 5, Subdivider shall execute a Developer's Agreement to ensure that the parking expansion, ncreening/fencing# and re-adjustment of exterior lighting is co-^pleted by September 1# 1989. Subdivider shall provide an acceptable form of security to the City in th^ amount of S5#000.00 to be in effect through November 15# 1909. 6. The subdivider shall provide the City with an executed road and utility easement le granted to the Hennepin County Department of Transporcation. 7. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office and Registrar of Titles office on or before December 12# 1909 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and other covenants and eas^'n**^* s required by this subdivision approval. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expired if the division has not been filed by the date specified tbove. In that event# it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Pace 2 of 3 S'*"!"It'.-:* 5 t •’ V V •s fhJjfA i.ms^^. lA “• 'A.-w. Vrr'r: ,.v^ ' V ^2^^ r v~. 4. A. M'Sll • . .t.»**• ^ m *1 1 *5 'V I •'-4 X-Vv'••,v4*4 r:. .v.%-: ■City of OROIVORESOLUTION OP THE city COUNCILNO.^ ... 12th day of‘^Junef 1989.^* Council of Orono, Minnesota, this ATTDST: 9 t /JCorothy^^ hallin. City Clexr. Canes K. Crano'k, Mayor—' STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) S8. COL’NTY CP HENNEPIN ) this '2^h?a*v o?*?u-r^ edged before me on Maver‘i Citv'clerk o'%h« nff,®® ‘ Dorothy M. Ha 11 in, co'^po^a^’on and Crono, a Minnesota municipalCitv. instrument vas executed on behalf of the X ' ft *«I . Notarv Public p**-MJW<yuuH»w»» ■ ■ » ■■ '; **'*;>v IIAtlRIf H. SCHflKta Ji 'i 4.^* I tv •.•. - ( V. * »«(NNUIN CCA/Nft * ‘ VR, .4.*yH,|t.4,<« •s»**««4*l*9J My Connission Expires 'age 3 of 3 ..«#« Xk>'m ^9 *% t >i * A* l-v i ;'J %» ^/£ • •} ..•> •fiCp$i^mMK. wl P^'V • ‘.V- UX > ' Vj' ■*'■ V'S ->.' .“ IsV-. 3I ■i. I f fl' i! II 1 li! Ia 2 a ii; i 0 I I I I I i 1 i I 31 ; s ll U 6 « • I I i i I? i I 1 • • • • t iiiil; s I i i s « I h ■Ihihi H X i Is Mil I'fei ii . illlli ■' M (iitlii IJ J •i !! li ii !i ;ii i;: 3^55' i • J” \ I [ iiii'i ! “I -i pi-’ i i! i il'" IlnU; il 3i 3tiiiu j is I -TIj Lil 5 -N i*» ! It t __L J •« I M X33yx5 avi'a’d btmjU ... I M««4rj*A9\--** *0» J.tt.IC.OM*-/ I -r*' Lo- I iimriTLE I f I r-r^---------- M •••o-^.S-! <• !x 1 r 1 ; V/f^'■ ilu !% i * C • Q y], .« »it ^ 1 1 U O '^2 ifl tfr iS ; *'• •a -c K f. 3 I? ih 1 w ? 3 TO: Proa: Date: Subject Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator January 8, 1990 #1487 Marty Schneider/Art Center of Minnesota, 2180 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing A- r^^ Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - The Art Center of Minnesota and Marty Schneider, the new owner of the property, have applied for a conditional use permit for the continued use of the structure and property for school use. The City approved a lot line rearrangement of the original Art Center properties on the 12th of June, 1989. The subject property consists of 25,440 square feet or .563 acres. List of Exhibits Exhibit A ~ Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Resolution #2639 Survey of Existing Use Survey of Proposed Improvements when Single Family Residential Use is Installed on Property Review of Current Application - Both Mr. Schneider and the Art Center have applied to the City for a conditional use permit for the continued instructiona1/schoo1 use of the facility and grounds. No additional improvements or changes are proposed with this request. Staff has reviewed the previous lot line rearrangement application, the following issues must be resolved with the review of this current proposal: 1. Sewer connection. A condition of approval of the lot line rearrangement was that the single family structure would have to be connected to sewer. It would be staff's recommendation that the existing school structure also be connected to sewer. Originally, the school structure was assessed 2 units for institutional use and such assessments have been paid. The future usage rates shall be based on the institutional use. r 'I'vv Zoning File #1487 January 8, 1990 Page 2 of 2 2. Status of current developer's agreement and security. A condition of the lot line rearrangement also included the execution of a developer's agreement and supportive security to assure that the improvements required for single family residential use of the property were installed. If a conditional use permit is granted, approval must provide notice to both the Art Center and Mr. Schneider, the current owner, and any future owner that orior to the City issuing a building permit for single famil use of the property, the Art Center must re-execute a developer s agreement and submit appropriate security to insure the required site improvements originally established in the review of application #1397 are installed. Options Planning Commission denies the conditional use permit, please refer to Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A). 2. Approval. If approved. Planning Commission may wish to consider one or more of the following findings: A) The structure has existed on the property without negative impact on the surrounding adjacent residential neighborhood. B) No other changes are proposed on the site or within the structure as a result of this new request. C) The use is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and Orono Comprehensive Plan. Approval should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The school structure must be connected to municipal sewer by March 15, 1990. 2. Prior to the City issuing a building permit for the renovation to single family residential use of the structure, the Art Center of Minnesota must submit a newly executed developer's agreement and post an security to the City to ensure the required site improvements established in the review of Application i are installed. At the time of the conversion, if Center no longer holds any interest in the adDacent property, the current owner of 2180 North Shore Drive '^ii^ be responsible for site improvements. Mr. Schneider best advised to work out a separate agreement with the Art Center to safe-guard his interest in this matter, a y rate, it must be made clear to both parties that if single family use is to be installed, that either one or the other will be held responsible for the installation of the improvements by the City of Orono. r ZONING PILE NO. 1497 CITY OP ORONO ROTICE OP PLAHRIHG CORMSSION ACTIOM Crysta!” B*ay, HN 55323 47_3_-7_357_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n«nT“"Mlr^v'qchneIder''' COPIES TO: Art Center of MN U35 H^tet Drive wayzata, MN 55391 A?tn: DirLto” TYPE OP APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE OP MEETING: 1/16/90 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 Provide City with adequate time to seek opinion fron) City IS^a spe\ific^l?ion discussed during the meeting, nnLfhlv a 2 vear period or related mote to a specific period of time ?SI?1ou^ lea'se^ t“e^r%erty to the Art Center for the school use. 2. sewer hookup by the amended date of June 15, 1990 (Hill School Structure). 3. An authorized representative of the Art Center of Minnesota be present at the Planning Commission meeting. It was the general consensus of the Planning Commission that provided the Hill School structure is hooked up to the sewer and that there is an acceptable guarantee of "h^olo^ ^st^^^^ wL itrcVnUn%“d?t%*art1.'eyVou\'’d°'reloVm'end approval of the proposed conditional use permit. It would be beneficial for both Mr. Schneider and J sit down with the City to work out an acceptable agreement that would deal with the above noted concerns prior to scheduling the application for review by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney will be ^^ked for his opinion concerning the limitations upon the conditional use permit as above the week of January 29, 1990. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth, 473-7357, at the City offices if you have any questions concerning the matters discussed above. J minutes of T**E planning commission meeting JANUARY 16, 1990 ZONING PILE #1484-STASIK CONTINUED duly noted. Mabusth said that the Planning Commission had previously reviewed and approved this property for a hardcover and average lakeshore setback variance to construct an addition. Kellev asked at what point the City requires that the house be pulled back to conforn with the average lakeshore setback. Mr Stasik said that the house has been there for years and the f ?rn"dlAon. “ «r\^ ItXltc. is'denied Purchase t,e property and itj.nl lveVay s'’e7bacrbera“e\hV neighboring property is loolted in such a way it brings the average lakeshore setback further back. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Hanson said that he has questions whether the structure is a viable structure at this point? Cohen said that question is not before the Planning Commission. Mr Stasik noted that Kim Whitney received approval her to aid onto the property. He said that ii inconsistent to not allow his variance request since it is the same request. hardships. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1487 MARTIN SCHNEIDER 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:38 P.M. TO 10:15 P.M. Mr. Schneider was present for this public hearing. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mabusth explained the purpose of ^this Conditional Use Permit to continue the school property. Kelley asked Mr. Schneider why he had changed his mind. Mr. Schneider said that when he proposed his duplex use at 0 r MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16, 199Q ZONING PILE #1487’*SCBNEIDBR CONTINUED Structure available to the public. done to the property. were to he Mabusth clarified that it was the responsibility of th#» a»-4- Center to perform those changes and provide appropriate security to assure those changes are made. yy^^prxaze security Kelley asked if those changes had been done? Mabusth replied that they have not. belng’':anfp''ulated."'’“ “ Planning Co^^lssion was Mr. Schneider replied that it was not his intention to anipulate anyone. He said that when time came to close on the saleable'Diec't^^Center did not have a saleable piece of property. it was at that time that the Art application for a lot line rearrangement, hneider said that it was his understanding that once the property changed ownership, the conditional use granted to that no longer in effect. Mr. Schneider ^saTdV "if ih^d structure"*' l'^ H*'® that as a two u!l?t the propirty?*®''®'^ his intent for buying replied that was his intent and that was whv he came before the Planning Commission. Mr. Schneider said that «t"rut o7 dorna“ii'*'r- no rntirtlon''?oIgreemL? SJ Improvements required in the Developers /'li said that he has been cooperative in ry step of the various applications involving this property. that the Art Center should have a Mr. Hanson indicated that he was thoroughly confused. aoDlicltio^^ briefly explained the various bbm'^ ciry^s^fi/red^^L^ Mr. Schneider said that he had a two year lease with the Art 0 MINUTES OP THE PLAMNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16» 1990 ZONING PILE #1487-SCHNEIDER CONTIW Center. Kelley asked if the letter of credit would continue? Mabusth replied that the City has the ability to request an extension of the letter of credit. Kelley asked whether the City would do that? Mabusth responded that the Art Center feels that the Developers Agreement will no longer be in effect and they wish the City to return the letter of credit. Mr. Schneider said that Mabusth is suggesting that he provide a letter of credit continuining the spirit of the agreement entered into with the Art Center. Mr. Schneider said that he in turn would enter into a personal agreement with the Art Center, but he would provide the guarantee to the City that the improvements would be done. Schneider indicated that he would have no problem in meeting the requirements asked for in the Developers Agreement. Kelley asked Mabusth to identify the specific conditions of the subdivision approval. Mabusth said that all of the gravel parking area to the rear would be removed and a new parking area would be installed in the northern portion of the Art Center property. Mabusth said that a privacy fence was to be installed and some landscaping was to be done. Hanson asked about the tennis court. Mabusth replied that the tennis court is to remain in the domain of the Art Center. Brown asked about the sewer hookup. Mabusth said that the sale of the Hill School was to pay for the sewer assessments that the City had assessed. Mabusth said all that is remaining is for the structure to be connected to sewer. Mabusth said the only issues left to be resolved are the existing Developers Agreement, the letter of credit and making sure that if the Art Center ceases to exist, the required improvements are made. Mabusth said that Mr. Schneider has offered a solution in that he has agreed to provide a letter of credit and would execute the Developers Agreement. Kelley suggested that once the conditional use permit expires it would trigger the requirements of the Developers Agreement. Kelley also suggested that the length of the conditional use permit coincide with the length of Mr. Schneider's lease. 1 6 mihotes of the plminihg COMMISSIOH HBETING JAHOABY 1«, 1990 usually are not written in that manner, but could be. - w -A ^ eairi i*hatL he would Prefer to have the conditional permif^u^as long as the Art Center leases the property. Mabusth suggested reviewing the property every two years. j until th© n0xt in0©tin5 to pr"otrdeThl"^rptorfu^nU^\^^%sfe ’itain any limitations or options the City may have. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was continued. “ "t!r?hl'Ve\^r^atr2'ori99o‘’meeting?"T";aV’tht“^^ co“Vnsu\"Vf\\e%^%ring^ommission^^^^^^^ was hook0d up to sevisr, an cent0r C0as0 to 0xist thay improvements ^^'’““schneide^ said that after speaking to rexcrva°tTrrh:"w\^s informed t»at a se„e h not^be rsreV=iharrr^p^%-nta ”tTv%°"ort1?e AVt%i^^^^ b'e present at the next meeting. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1485 K-P PROPERTIES, INC. 340/350 NORTH ARM LANE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW proposed lot line Mabusth e*Plai2®^ «h®t this^i Estate, 2nd rearrangement of Lots 1 an „jath variances were approved Addition. Mabusth said th devalopars ara now with the subdivision of this ^ __ additional lot width asking the Planning Commission ourpose of this ^h^^“*^^ore^t;^^^i^-^%\V4r-wly^^Jul^^^ int^o the drainfield area. Brown and Hanson indicated that there sufficient hardship to warrant approval of the lot wi variance. Kelley said that he had some reservation. Mr. Don Peterson, one of the ‘^®^®^°^®^|n/fiQrth^Arm^Drive, had no agreement with Mr. Olson, owner interested in at this time. He said that Mr. °1?°" 17® of his subdividing and therefore is unwilli ^ said that theproperty for the «ty right-of-way Mr Peterson__^s^^^^^ two lots involved ” _reated bv a subdivision, desireable, 4 to 5 acre lots which ^ has = ourchase agreement Mr. Peterson said that he owns Lot 2 and ^P^^ rearrangement. Mr! P«e»cn''sa!ru ?Ee®?rirtaVe°s the additional 17' of right- 6) Termination of Lease Sepcombcr 11,19^0. e 7Re: Termination of lease dated August I5th 1989 between Martin B. Schnel'der ^ and Andrea E. Schneider -LESSORS- and The Arc Center of Minnesota (currently known as the Minnetonka Center for Che Arts) -TENi\iNT-. Address of leased property: 2180 N.Shore Drive, Orono, MN (Hill School/Center East). The above referenced lease shall be effectively terminated between the above listed lessors and tenant subject to the lollowing terms and conditions beine fulfilled. - - - 1) The Minneto payments as September I October 1 November I •e Minntjconko Ccncsi* for cHo Arcs sholl <issl^n or ocH^rwist^ convoyi or pay che lossors-SCHNEIDER- che $5,000.00 performance bond which is at present being held by ch City of Orono. SCHNEIDER will, following assignment of this bond, agree to perform che terras of the developers agreement between Ihe Arc Center oi Minnesota and Che City of Orono with respect to the above property relating to subdivision. 3) Tile Minnetonka Center for the Arts' undersigned representatives verily chat che MCA board of directors is aware and in agreement with this document. A) The lifelong tennis court lease between Schneider and The Minnetonka Center tor tlie Arts as stipulated in original purhase agreement remains in force. 5) No ocher provisions or stipulations or side-agreements have been made to terminate the above reference lease. In ocher words, che above conditions must be met^In order to terminate che lease. Martin B. Schneider Lessor Ann Larsen Executive director Minnetonka Center for the Arts Tenant rBarbara McBurney Board President Minnetonka Center for th Arcs Tenant f SV • » France, a cily near tlic Olympic Games location, Albertville. / Trained as a chef in France, Rudelius-l’almer, 26, came to Minnesota in ldS8, six months after meeting the woman he would wed two years later. “I was in love," he said of his ■ wife, Kristi, who is originally from Golden Valley. Once in Minnesota, Rudelius- Palmer enrolled at Hennepin •' Ch«f Erie' Rudelfer-Paliher grates potatoes fronch>style. (Craig Technical College to learn Amer- p ; J_‘"*irtLa*»lg/Stafl Photographer) ica" cooking techniques, he said. ••04.> «0 4i According to Judy Holscher, . s. was cnjoVablc. f C ! i ? ‘-r, • trcmcly favorable.” she said. Rudelius-Pauner did not want And Rudclius-Palmer is en- ''"'■’io leavc.^Hs.'dU.'Kc^’i V; • .. joying It, too. * . r-^Since^I remember, 1 wanted . to be a'cewk," he said; ”1 love the business.;;fJ;^r^.'pl5lS^t:;v i ^ After three ye^s, Rudeliusv Palmer tKciv^ his diploma,', I'graduating fifth in a class of: r'' *Tm very happy here," he said. “I plan on staying here. “Before Town & Country, Rudclius-Palmer was a chef at a restaurant in St. Paul. Hours there usually conflicted with his wife’s work .schedule, which *' 'tcr:->-<-'^;;CHEF/To Page 2B ' A'.•“.T ' ' .•X • t S Ilips tithes painting techniques of oldlihasters Ordnoschool offers student exhibit . • ;j,l ■ ; ‘.I <*t- • ■ . • Arts& Entertainment vfj Story and photos by ' 'Elisabeth Wigolsworth < Cummings f /k.i.and Brenda Mann V;’ .' I Cobtrlbuting Writers Z r I .Ihe old Hill Schoolhoitse on ; if I 'KNbrth Shore Drive in Orono ■ has found new life through an old style of art It’s the hew home of ' Atelie'r LeSueur, a unique art school. In Jah age of .computer-generated .' art, the aielier'teaches art in the style of thcjold masters.-'."Atelier" is • French for ‘‘workshop." *i'Like thc apprenticeships of old, .' ensuring time for their own art. The ithc classes have a ratio of eight to 10 students agree this nukes a difference students per teacher. . in the instmetnrs' tMching abilities. It J.'Owner/instructor...;. Annette seems to keep them fresh and in- I,eSueur of Wayzata often'refers to volved and llieir enthusiasm and love ^ teaching the "sight of the old mas- of their art never lags. ters."r‘Artists like.’ Rembrandt, . 'llic students ’ work is indeed im- Michelangelo^ Raphael and Ve- pressive. Even the children in John- • lasqucz developed the style of art known as classical realism. Atelier ATELIER/foPagc. 6B LxSuetir instructors pass on this vi sion to their students. Marc John.son, .Steven Levine, Mike Coyle, Kim Allcman-Bcaty and t Jeon Graph ore graduates of the ate- . lier. : t LeSueur sets strict limits on how many classes instructors may teach. ^ jT ' 4 •• • r» I • ' • *- ; ‘ Elizab«th SogriUo paint* raallstically In tha tradition of tho old maotWa at Alollor LoSuour .. on North Shoro Drlvo In Orono.K'jtJb'.'fJ/rpiiTrt’;'': r .- r .• f r ••#• 4 •• 4 > r V • I * ** •I • I. • • “1 worked in television ior 18 “\Vc had a great stage manager in tyears,” said the 61-year-old, who 22-year-old Eric Marsel), who 'also has'lS'years of community was very loving and compassion- (inuter on His resume. ' ate." '•] Lotsbcrg diji.his first ‘‘Fogey Lotsberg said he wants “to get accompanist will be provided.The 16 performances of “New Fogey Follies of 1994 “ will open June 8 at the Howard Conn I he- atre and run weekends through « • • • wI *!Sunday, June 19. ,t ; tureil "Yankee Dood’Last year‘s show featured 40 '^‘‘Boogie Woogie Bugh seniors singing and dancing in a ; the Andrew Sisters an full-scale musical revue that fea- of Broadway.? ! ,t •ATELIER/From CoverIson's illustration class display well-, j groomed talent .• \i: ■( •>,The atelier’s students vary greatly. iSome come from as far away as 'Switzerl^ ^ Japan. Some are taking a few classes per week for per- •sonalfulftllment. ••'* i' Judith Curland of St. Louis Park said, “My youngest is five — it‘s ;lime for me to leam to draw." ' Some students are working fuli- •■ time on their art with the intention of ■seeing their pieces sold in galleries. ’ Many ,haye taken instruction at ■other ait schools. A few were com- .metcial aitists.' '<’ 'i ^ Acomnmnthteadseemstobethat .their talents were not fully realized. iThe style of the masters seems to pro vide fulfUlment,.) ■> .1- r»s I' Among those graduating from .Atelier LeSueur are Carolyn Link, Kim Alieman-;Beaty of Hopkins and Patrick Devonas of Shorewood. Their 'work will be on display Saturday at ■theateUer.;V'.''-''‘ •. '' 1 |Alleimm-Beaty wd she wa.s fnis- trated in her work as a commercial aitisL •> • J/ {"1 didn't like the restriction of doing only what the client needed and haying to be.restrairied by time and ■ money."<‘• ^hat: Atelier LeSueuf’" ' silent ^slmw.,,V^en: 1 |o'.4 pjn. Salur;^^; - day, April*J6?i- ..v- . /mere:)2180,Notth.Shorer^ Drivc^Orona^^^;-;";. AdmissionI l^oiinaUqn:j473-596‘'. i after she started her studies at the ate lier. After graduation, she will contin ue to in.<tnict and pursue her interest in spiritual art. Another graduating artist is Patrick Devonas. He started art school at age 16 in Switzerland. While studying abstract art, he realized he wanted to learn symbolism. He studied illustration at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. A teacher tliere responded to his frustration with a brochure from the atelier. An exceptional student, Devonas is graduating from a four-year pro gram after three years. One of tlie few full-time students, he is able to sup- poit himself with his ait. He pl.uis to go on to graduate studies, continuing with art work and instructing. Doth artists art available for com missioned work. Their work and that of others will be on display Saturday. Marc Johnson's illustration class 'I At one point,' she comniuted be- has work on display at the Jack Wold - tween Guam'and Minnesota. Her Fine Art Gallery in Minneapolis. In- ; husband.was.transferred to Guam .formation; 339-5191. ‘Wastebasket Revuetc6h& to break run recoidsToibiis!. • % *4*. i . ^ IScholarships are benefited by schoplspng and da staff Report feilir;- ^^^sseo School District 279 I I has produced its original V-X VMiety show, "The Waste- bxsket Revue," for 27 years. The volunteers’ work has raised $323,500 for scholarships for graduating seniors over the years. The eight performances with a total of 5,700 seats at Park Center High School auditorium are usual ly sold ouL The original show grossed ^ ^ ^ enough at the box office to award restaurant. Planet Marlwood. MW I’Mlbe music,is a varie ,;tuoei and Utt'piceil ^ from llM 1960i:b'^' '‘ ''’■•'The show opened A ;r continues through April Among the commi are Ann Wobig, diret ' .Swingin' Eds. directo ‘^^Dally, who founded a u the'Atlantis. Theatre ir '* Park, producer Ross ri Maple .Grove Junior •»chief writer Steve Au« p, . brook JElementuy., seven scholarships for a total of $2,000. Marl Ramsey, superintendent« of Osseo schools, plays the vision- . This year's 21 winners are ary owner of the megamall com- . being presented a total of $33,000. plex. The show this year is “Marl of America.” lt‘s based around a variety of His faithful mascot is a burro called "Smokey." The musical portions of the-^ skits that spoof a family's visit to show include two different sets by T.‘ a giant mall and the unusual char- the 70-plus members of the dis>^-‘ acters tliey meet along their way, trict's.singing group, the Swingin ’''l>' including a visit to the newest Eds, led by Arm Wobig.' 'i': t .F, I-,; r- -• • t... 'I, . *• —.. '■'••• I »•*»93ei"'' I Crf 8964800 nirmi towiky Out) A^U UU«avii 3 L 1 ; 4 Atelier Le Sueur 1 t STUDIO SCHOOL OF ART IN THE TRADITION OF THE MASTERS X'X _ i #« 1 \ i I r AteliiT Ix'Siieur is dedicated to tji%in^ students the best possible^ training in the art of* representational drawing and painting. It is modeled alter the studio sch<N>ls of nineteenth eenturv France. I he Atelier or studio s\steni was ile\eli'ped iluriim the seven- tet nth centui \ as a tiiodil leation ol the oUler apprent ieeship system. It rctiched its .ipe\ in nineteenth eentur\ ranee and has proven to be one of the most elTeetive means of teaching painters. In this system, students progress at their ow n rates through a series of graduated exercises which develop their ubilitv to render nature accuratelv. Ihc student-instruetor ratio is kept very small (twelve students per in.stt uetoi). I his enables the instructor to eive optimum attention to each student arul to tailor the instruction to meet the needs of the individual. It provides for ma.ximum development of individual creativity, ensuring that each student learns the methods necessary to paint successful pictures. C'a>t Drawing Ho.'i Arthaud. first \ear student I #'.V 4 iir i^ Interior Stephen Gjertson. consultant for Atelier LeSueur I'he itistructors at Atelier l.eSueur are working artists, trained in the Atelier system. I hes ha\e studied the metluHls of both the French academic painters and the American Impressionists. In lact. they are part ol a remarkable lineaee that can be traced back in an unbroken chain of masters and pupils to the eighteenth cen tury French painter. Jacques Louis David. Because of this training the instructors are able to transmit to their students the ability to see and understand nature with a sensitivity and skill similar h) that of the great artists ol the past. Few artists can claim such a heritace. At a time when mo.st art schools no longer leach repre.sen- tational painting. .Atelier lAvSueur stands apart as one of the last vital links in this coni inning tradition. r Adult parl-linti. curses are olfired to students »ith or wtlhoiit experience who would like to improve their draw ing and painting skills. Munv ol the school s lull-tinie siiidciils hegan in the parl-timc program. Others cIuh.sc to maintain iheir part-time status, melding iheir art studies with career and amily. The same skills laught in the full-lime program can he loarnccl m the part-time courses t>ver a longer period. Petj and Ink stud\ alter Aritnir Rackliam Mare Johnson, first year student A part-time program for gifted yoimg students is also offered. this program (ages four through eighteen) is designed to cultivate the special potential which man) students seem to have at an cai ly age. The young students are trained in pencil, watercolor and pen and ink teehnujues. They are taught to develop their own imaginative paintings after the manner ofHngland's great book illustrators of the 18S()‘s through I920*s. f or more infoniuiiion concerninu Atelier I e.Siieur uriie or e.ill; Amii'tle Ivi'Sueur Director of Atelier IxSiieiir 3565 Deephu\en .\>eiiiie Uav/ata, .Minnesota 55391 (612) 475-1814 • Annette LeSueur reeeneJ her an irainini; from Riehanl Lack a Atelier Lack m Minneapolis. MN. Richard I.aek was trained w ir.^ o with William Paxion illiam laxion was trained b\ the nmeieenth eenturv French painter Jean-l,eon (Jerome. 9 ^ r I-' r-. sS Pi ii i^ . ISt II |•«lHl.lH Sii ’.i. I .\in. lomlli \c.ii shuk'iit .'T r Atelier lA“Siieur offers a fiill-tiiiie. four \ear program for students interested in the serious and intense study of traditional dra^^in^ and painting. In the Atelier program, students work eight hours a day. fi\eda\s a week. HaltDt the student s day is spent working in their t>wn studio - eubieles where the\ progress through east, still-life, and l>i>rtrait painting, fhe remaining halfday is spent in the lifeelass. draw mg »>r painting from the human figure. Weekly leeturesand assignments are given m composition, anaiomv . memory draw ing. perspective, aiul art history. Graduates of this prt)gram may eontinue their studies in the advanced Atelier program in whieh the ratio of students to instructor is more limited (four students per instructor). Students are given the t>ppt>ruinitv to develop the additional skills necessarv to do complex interit>rs .and imaginative paintings. \ /. 1 I rr mFy 4 a U Students are taught to obtain accurate proportions by using the “sight-si/e” method. When drawing still-life objects at their natural si/e. as in the example above, the still life and canvas arc placed siile bv side. I he student stands six to eight feet away to observe the measurements through the use of horizontal and veiiieal lines. I his method was used by sueh artists as Rembrandt Van Rijn and John .Singer Sargen*. r I m; ARis THE OTHER TWENTIETH CENTURY The new Christine lietor Gnllerx offers a very speeijic' kind <f tradiii(>nal art —ehissieal realisni. liy Wolfyafiy Stahn / Its m If ym^- i-f’ Wf-?J h'u fiiitd i iiG /\ t\t i4\tiUtl \ntlattnidij. •»tl '• M M I N N\ \ I N » I M 1.1 S' SI !•; I \i|i> a r ( hnslifk* \ .1 Mimplinni^ ncu tirv j M LMik iN llu! h.lN |UNl»»|VIUil .KT*»nn1Ik‘ xlftvl IliMIl Its lmIU i N. C hi InIIIK* «»f S.iMlj Iv I lk- ikAK L’.ilkTN i»fk‘is. in .1 niik- kvnih vi.imiiv .imhiiiki*. .1 vc*i\ N|Vvifu kllki »»| lljJltU»lul n ( LisNkjl kcMllMlI \IcIk I I SlKUf IV |IK‘ MHlfvC' loi 1114»s| Ol ilk- p.iinlinL’v 4»ltcivil .il ( In ivliik* \ kl4>r In .kklili4»n i4* ivpfvv<*nlinL’ .in .illuiikCi't ailivlv luiik’vi in tlk* nk !li4Hlv .iiul plnl4»M»plik‘> <»l ilk* .lldk l vWk lll. \lc*lk*l I c* S»k*UI |sj 1n4» a sUkli4» svti4n»l in ilk* liaililion 4»l ilk* nuivlci'v II 4»lk*ts a Uhii l4» voc'ii \cai pn»jjiain ilali 4.ak*il I»» L’l\ itlL* vllkk fllv llu* Iwl |ktssihlc irainiriL ’ in ilk* ai1 ivpii'x. nLilHMul jviinlinL’ ( LiNSkal kc aliMii in ilk* l\VL*nlk‘lh vt*n Iiir\ lx*4.aiik* c iulaikjciVil l4» ilk* jiiMnl 4»f ncai c\liik ii4»n h\ ilk JiMiniKiikc* 4»I ilk* \aii4Hiv ni4kl4.*in .iM nukciik'niv \v ilk* Javui 4>t a ik*\K 4.i*nliii\ appn>a4.Ik*v. il iv nuking a Ivaiililiil KMkciA. aiul C hi isliik* \ klni iv piAHkl l4»li4i\L* lvi*n wikkcn u» ivpiwcnl ihis c\i\*pli4»iuillN l.ik nlal .iiul riL’4>i4Hivl\ iniiik\l ^jiiHipof p^iink'iN h» iiikk iMaikl uhal nuikcv ihiv art Jilk ivni. «i hi k*l knik al ilk* hivu»i\ «»! ilk* li.iininL’ 4»l painuiv iv in l♦uicI I IlMHlL'IkHlI ilk* 4.X*nUlI k*v llk*K* lui\C IVCII lhivch«isk iik'lhtKls 4»l irainin^ painkTv ilk* appivnikc v\sk ill, ilk* acailtim. .inJ ilk* alclk ‘1 ivlikiko \\vk*m I Ik* .ippicnlki* v\v Icin ili>niinak*il ilk* |viuhI lii»in ilk* MuldU* \Lk‘sl4»llk* Hijjh kcnaissaikt* liuk-imnal k> a tnask i al an c.ii l> a\ic. ilk* cippivnlkk* lvi!an \\ ilh iik'nkil i.iskv Mk h as swccpini: lhH>is. ck‘»iniinj Ilk* siiklk*. .iiul washing hriislk's rik st* L’kkiu.ill) ii.iNt* wa\ li» iiuuv ini|'H»rtanl |4»hs hkc L'liiklinL* 4.4»ltus. laxiinj III uikicrp.iinlMIL'S, .iiul ikinsIcM iinj t an**«»ns* lo panels \fk*i sill Ik k*ni e\|vik*ike ilk* appivnikv \v4»ikal*»n im|i»»nani pic Uiivs aikl 4issi>k\l ilk* nuLsk'i ilik*vll> in extvuiiivj eoin missk»ik*il woi k I Ik* Ivsi sUklenis even lu.ill> Kvaiik* niask'is aiul 4*|vnal sUklu's 4»l ihcii 4k\n \1k lk‘LinLw*l»». K.iphael. aikl I .ouiaiil' uLi \ Ilk 1 all Ivi’aii as appivnikvs I lk* acavleinx .ii**si in siMeenlh eeniur * llal>. inliikhk iiiL' ilk* s\sk*in »»! separalc leaeheis lor ihtteieni suhjeels. and ni!kll\ eaU*L*»»i i/iiiL’ ilk* \aii4»us elemcnis »»l pie luieniakiiiL ’ ink» a soineuha! mllexihle ein I k iiliiiii Iliealeliei »»i suidn* s\siein emepjed in Ilk* seveiiieenih 4.eniui\. 4»lfeiiinj ihe hesi elemenis 4»l the pi i*»i s\sieiiis w iilunil then iliavvl\k ks \n esi.ihlisheil painlei 4»|vned his sUkli4» i4* a selevi enuipi»f siiuienis who |\iul a iiiiHlesi lee I lulei his eiikianee. ihe siiklenis imehl assist the iiiasiei in his 4»w n wiMk. hill einplusis was mi ileNelop me ilk* skills aiul l.ilenis i»| ihe siiklenis u» piKiiike itkte|x*iuleiil. liilK lMiik*d |\iinteis Kemhiaiuirs iiaimiiL' was in an .ileliei. .iiul he 4»|viak*il .1 siikli4»i»l Ills own al the heiehl t»l his jkipiilai il> Ihe.ilehei s\sk*m woikeil I* M / ||! I Stt phi n (iu n\*m: the I iimh of i'uHi."oil. >4 \ <6 i Rt, hiitil I tit k ' Hiir\A \t Itihit tu! 24 ^ l«Mlss\MMi M 1,1 SI SI i»ll Min k ‘**0 M r r • - » y >* ^ 'S 4^^-' ^<4 IfSTf *»=• « «v, •» ^ *Jr J •P JL^ 1 W>' . • '•m 6>*^ \t It htit f ( I *\ h Si4ffin:t f I Itifl, >w t t \ I %ikt Suju Ht*f 1*// /J * /^» W >« » ' yJfF V ^ mw0 ^ ■■ - **»JS i-’fc* "-''A •' •'*: '■'■ 4 ’• >■5 i.‘-j ' I /'■. -^ .V s . ,, - /,I' ^. /*M»*'1 ' » l .' \ V N . \' r Ivi.iUM* It t»»f !lw mjMmiim ilcvclopmciit t»l iikli\u Iiki K !c\iliv il\ wfiik cn^ininL’ »»! ifu-vjjti i»t p.iintinjj I lk' jiKi'Ml *’l Nknlcrn \W in ifk' iwcn liclti ccnluiA c*inpfuM/al mili\ k IimI i.*\pics Mon A\ ilk’ v. \|X*nM.‘ »»t ifk* sUiiKijiiiN ilui Iku I U h icnliif 1^.*^ pn»N ivlckl .1 more or com inon .i^rverneni jn lo wlui woriMiUiieil a pic line naineK. iIki I line. ct»lor. and value should pre^enl .i harm»»nitHis unil to ihe eullivaled cac . lhal drawmjj sh«nild Iv K incx I on skilllul and seledive rranslalion ol the lac Is ol nalure. and lhal the c tiosen Mihjeel should Iv prescMiled in a Lin^ihle .md under siandahle manner ( uhisin. ahsiraei e\['iesMonism. surreal ism. lauvisin. dadaism, eoneepuialism, minim»ilisin. •kc«Mismie!ionism. and i'lher iruHlern isius* have all pnxiueed hnlliani and hisii»ricall\ sii^mrieani workst»l art. hul Ihive ck»ne so wifh disdain lor ihe sivles. ineilkKls. and suhieeisol the ereal masters ol the past Is the ereal. elassieal laneiKiee »»l painline l*»si to conlem|^narA anisis' lor lunateK il is noi Ihe men and women asMkrated with ( hrisime \ iel»»r and \ic lier I e Sueur are keepine alive and v ihranilv puKluetive the studio svsk in and the stand.irds that Modem An iiHAements have disavowed I he unhro ken c ham linkine ( hr isime \ letor s artists lo rlv eiea! (\iinlerA ol tiv ninekvnth eenturv IvL ’ins in the eienicvnih eenturv atelier ol the L’leal I leneh pamlei Jacc|ues l aniis Dav id H is siudio prov ided tlie nn»del lor suhse ijuenl nineteenth and iwentieth eenturv ate lietN I )av id s iHipil. 1 ‘aul IVIanvIv. kvame the master who trained Jean I otn (ierome. who m turn trained William MeCireeor l*a\ton. one ol the loundersia the lk»ston SelnH»l KM Ives (iammell studied under l\i\ti»n and was the teacher ol Kicharvl I ,tc k. deatml tlv current eriHi|u»l arlistsexhihitine at Christine \ ictoi I ack s pupil. Annette I eSueui. isiheworthv heir tiUhis jjoUlen chain Atelier I e Sueur continues the ailistic tradition that m America came to Iv called the hosion Sc hoid l aiiv Hosit»n painters laiivll. hunker. IVC'amp. Hale, aikl Ihvion were trained m P.ii is m the academic tra dition t«»ward the end the nineteenth een turv I hev all eventuallv erav itated to im pressionisin. then in its mlanev m I ranee ()n returmriL’ ti* \meriea. thev set »»ut to lashuMi a sc luk»l ol paintine that would com hine. through sikceediriL’ LvneratuMis ol siu dents, the Ivst ol the academic and impies smnist traditions intt» a unu|ue XmerieanaH I X-dicated to the look ol the v isihle wor Id. the lleetine ellec ts ol lieht. and the mime diacA i\\ gesture lound in ever vdav hie. thev liMinded a tradition ol [\imtirii; and tea». h iiiL’unic|ue to American art. ilut is piohahlv the longest coniiiiume ma|oi scti****! ol pjini Sti \t n i t \in ' N me in our IiisIoia . icMc hiiiL’ hac k <Aei a hun died veals Honor me itadilion wiihout hollow mu lalion. without saciiriciiie suhieetiv ilv. indi V iduahsin. CM mventuMi. the Atehei I e Sueur painters ol ( hr isime \ ic Icm aie remai ka hie m then talenl. dedicaticm. and imaei naticMi riieii winks evc»ke emotion and awe alcMie w ith a scmisc * ol eraiitude Icm their c«»ur aee and determination m ac hic*v me Iradi tional ereatness aeaiiist the m»Klernis| rule c»l the twentieth eenturv ( hrisime \ ict«»i also oilers c Lissk .iI hhMi/eshv mteinatuMullv acclaiiiucl svulp loikiikSi Maui A siimmarV ol the euid me philosophv ol the c lassic al realist masiei^ evluhiime at ( hi isimc* \ ic 1cm can he l.iken licmi the wolds c>l the ereat and mlluential I ivnch impressionist. Ideal Deeas I he sevret, said I Veas. “lies m lollow me the counsels which the masters e.ive iis thrcMieh their pic tures w hile we do scune thine dillerent Iicmu what thev did *’ ( hnsiint I It h»f ( iti/U n i\ ht titt tl in tlir / / ( \ nth t Mtill ti! ihf c t»n\i f (^Itl Siinlti ft ihtiltiHil lli//<7 Situ t, J/</eoM4///\ </« M.VV thi \iftt i fh »/M ( hnsinu Iff Stiniti h (iullt n IlfuiMiit \fi>ntiti\ fhntiii:h StinotIti\ ^ tWtl Si4Htlii\ II ^ (Hf It lt fflinnr isf|si <IS.< ’^>20 ( Imsnr.t I /i /o; (itillt r\, m: I tist \Uiit r Si . Siiniti f t \ M S^Sfl mcissvMvii vnasi m ni Mhi k About Atelier LeSueur Atelier LeSueur is a studio school in the tradition of the French ateliers of the 19th Century. A limited number of students work under one anist/instruaor for five years, learning classical drawing and painting. Students progress through studies of plaster casts, still life and portraits, in conjunction with drawing and painting from the model daily. Landscape painting classes take place outdoors during ^e summer months. This kind of thorough grounding in drawing and painting from life has been the cornerstone of training great artists for centuries. The atelier system came about in the late 18th Century with the French painter, Jacques Louis David. From that time forward, an unbroken succession of master to pupil can be traced to the present day Atelier LeSueur. Such a link gives the students access to the teachings f such great painters as Jean Leon Chrome and William Paxton. Through this lineage, the student acquires the “eye" of the master. Atelier LeSueur is one of the last schools that can claim such a heritage in a world where both the techniques of the great painters and the method of communicating them have fallen into disuse. Atelier LeSueur is committed to maintaining these traditions for the benefit of today ’s world and the future great artists yet unborn. lO MINNETONKA ^ aNTER FOR THE ARTS 2240 North Shore Drive • WayzatJ VtN HI • i612) 473-7361 April 1,1994 Mr. Jeff Scott. Development Director Atelier LeSueur c/c 723 Penn Avenue North Minneapolis, MN. 55411 Dear Jeff: This will confirm that Atelier LeSueur students, staff and guests are rear parking lot at the Minnetonka Center for the Arts when overflow parking'S n^ed room to share). It was good to talk with you. and I wish you the best with your upcoming showsl Sincerely. /Ann Larsen / Executive Director copy: J. Hammes. Weekend Registrar '•I TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:April 13, 1994 SUBJECT: #1924 Don A. Winter, 4620 North Arm Drive West - Variances - Public Hearing Application - Request for area variance for an oversized accessory structure and setback variance to allow strucmre to be located between residence structure and front lot line. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Letter of Request C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Staff Sketch F - Construction Plans G - Air Photo H - 10.03 Subd (C,D) Pertinent Code Section Section 10.03, Subd. 9(D) and Subd. 9(C)(3) prohibit an accessory strucmre from being located between the principal building and the front lot line. z..Section 10.03, Subd. 9(C) limits the area of an oversized accessory structure on this 3.87 acre lot to 1,600 s.f. (1,800 s.f. proposed). Discussion Please review applicant’s letter of request. Applicant proposes an 1,800 s.f. storage shed and workshop to be located west of the front line of the house. The west lot line is considered the front lot line due to the road outlot location. This lot is currently quite remote although the property to the north has potential for a residential 2 acre subdivision. As noted by the applicant, the entire lot is wooded and quite high in elevation. The nearest existing homes are barely visible in the winter, and in summer would be completely screened from the proposed building location. Review of Location Options Applicant has review his proposed location and two other potential locations which, while not requiring a location variance, would present a number of problems related to topography, screening, tree removal, grading, etc. The letter of request contains a number of factors which Planning Commission might conclude constimte hardships that justify the location variance. Zoning File #1924 April 13, 1994 Page 2 Size Variance Again, please review applicant’s letter of request for an oversize accessory structure footprint area variance. Please recall that the oversized accessory structure ordinance was adopted in an attempt to match the size and square footage of accessoty structures to the overall size of the lot. Is the 200 s.f. variance justified in this case by certain factors such as adequacy of screening, relatively modest height, and setbacks in excess of those required? Is there adequate hardship and/or other justification to support the granting of a size variance? The property owner is required to execute an oversized accessory structure covenar -Mch would require removal of the ovp-sized structure if the property is ever subdivided. Sul t.. uion is not feasible under the current 2 acre standards since the lot is less than 4 acres in area, hence the covenant conditions would only come into play if a future lot line rearrangement resulted in the property decreasing in size. Staff has reviewed the proposed structure height which would be approximately 15’ at the peak using the proposed 4:12 pitch. This height would appear to equal but not exceed the height oi the existing house. The structure would be approximately as wide and about 3/4 of the length of the existing house. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission has a number of options including: 1. Approval as proposed. 2. Approve location variance only 3. Approve size variance only. 4. Deny both requests. 5.Table. 6.Other. Planning Commission should specify the hardships and justification for any recommendation of approval, and specify any further conditions j ou feel are appropriate. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE ICAXION r ‘S ./i eyj-'. A •*- ♦ Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address H^2.o COgST r rrv r-r WA I I C^f^WlTW* FJ.V4V''^ .-rrrrr f Vvf JVrVrjA.VA•4 ni rZklK'j, eult T?t u 4.W* V • W .'•« 11 w* V' • vv Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OCa-om.-c>c>o2. CHECK iitCEIPT-THAKK YOU sOymCiL-V): 1,01 ri6: /» • /•/“ Vv.*/ A. Vi" Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey Date Property Acquired I (do)d^o n^tI)also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; \ residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: (month/year) APPLICANT Name OoN Address : MU2-o N Di2_ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name________S.»tw\Ci Address: City: Phone (home) 4"11.- 4*bQ(;» Phone (work) U~)g.. rv\OovNX>____Zip: _ City: Phone(home) Phone (work) Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQ^^ST Estimated Construction Cost $ lO/O^o_____ Describe request in detail: pus^t, <3^ V43c<»nowO I Kt f=Va^tor N yygjr> (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ^ Other (specify) S.<ce- HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preve nting compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Inijn kUiTU* T7rrI u m VV V“.*| ru a vv i-* vna l\ I c*u . ni I 1 i. • »V1 ! XU* 03/25, REQUIRED SUBiVflTTALS order Completed Application Form Courted Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain ihit i!„ r Henneptn County Depantnent of Finance, A-603, Govu Center 348 32^ / ^ , Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 348-3271). Cas»ewft, s-af-lj Certilicate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover reTrodSn.“ “Py * "" for ^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing „ are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copv 8'A” x 11" for^rt^nr^H ^Sketches or plans of floor /elevation vLl^^mvide o^nl a)t;;‘’8^"riT-r’ — List of the kgal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s) ***''’*'‘®^ A» an addendum to this annlication. nl^^f* ortorh o ______ i.-.. _r8. _ A.an addend^ to this application, please afmch a seplr"^ you wish notified* of this application. ^ -Zr Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vanance application is not complet e if the above mform.Hnn H.. nnt ^ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE .The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Admimstrator agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by^riginal fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature _/Xy, /Jy^, Jr. Date 3-J2S-9V OVVTVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entjy onto tbe property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission memb^^L^J CoIcM members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. ^iJ2tn /<J^' J-Date mS. Pla/dn! om«s 25 days before tbe Planning Commission ADD tennrc m Tk® M«tmgs are held on tbe third Monday of each month. Md Council "J? ‘oeeltogs of the Planning Commission totvnr^u'thonvJfT “ malte arrangements this change prior ” m?m“ “ O'"" 8 ^ 1 G ) - « _ • y'O.Mkfc- CITY OF ORONO HARDSHIP VARIANCE REQUEST DON A. WINTER 4620 N ARM DRIVE MOUND, iNLN 55364 5 rteQpta? FC> SITE LOCATION VARIANCE OUR NUMBER ONT CONCERN IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE BUILDING IS ITS ESTHETIC EFFECT ON OUR PROPERTY AND THAT OF OUR NEIGHBORS. OUR HOUSE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF 4 ACRES OF BEAUTIFUL SUGAR MAPLE, BASSWOOD, AND RED OAK TREES. WE DO NOT WANT TO ANY THING THAT DESTROYS THE BEAUTY OF THIS WOODS. WE SPEND A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF TIME IN KEEPING THE WOODS CLEAN AND IN THE LANDSCAPING OF OUR FRONT AND BACK YARD. WE HAVE lOO'S OF FLOWERS BLOOMING ALL SUMMER LONG. OUR LAND IS CONSIDERED PART OF WHAT WAS CALl.ED THE "GREAT WOODS". WE WOULD LIKE TO PRESERVE THE VIEW OUT OF OUR BACKYARD PICTURE WINDOW, PATIO AND DECK. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO PLACE THE BUILDING IN A LOCATION THAT COMPLEMENTS THE HOUSE AND DOES NOT REMOVE MANY OF THE OLD MAPLE TREES. IN THE PROPOSED LOCATION THIS BUILDING SHOULD NOT BE VISIBLE TO ANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS EITHER IN THE WINTER OR SUMMER. THE BUILDING WILL HAVE OUTSIDE WALLS OF ONLY 10 FEET, AND A ROOF PITCH AND COLOR TO MATCH THE HOUSE. LOCATION » 1 ( OUR CHOICE ) • BUILDING IS IN FRONT OF HOUSE BUT TO THE NORTH & DOES NOT MEET CODE. » BUILDING IS RUNNING NORTH & SOUTH WITH GARAGE DOOR TO THE SOUTH. • REQUIRES THE REMOVAL OF ONL\ TWO DEAD ELM TREES & TWO MAPLES. • LOCATION IS LEVEL AND WOULD REQUIRE NO FILL. • LOCATED CLOSE TO POWDER POLE - ENTRANCE WOULD BE LIT BY YARD LIGHT. • BUILDING CAN NOT BE SEEN BY NEIGHBORS EITHER WINTER OR SUMMER. • SHORT ACCESS TO PRESENT DRIVE WAY WITH NO TURNAROUND NEEDED. • DISRUPTS VERY LITTLE OF THE OPEN WOODS. » AESTHETICALLY THE BEST PLACEMENT OF THE BUILDING ON OUR 3.9 ACRES. LOCATION #2 • BUILDING WOULD LINE UP WITH FRONT OF HOUSE AND MEET CODE. » LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE HOUSE. • BUILDLNG IS RUNNING EAST & WEST WITH GARAGE DOOR ON THE W EST SIDE. • REQUIRES THE REMOVAL OF TWELVE MAPLE TREES FOR BUILDING & DRIVEWAY. • REQUIRES THE MOVING OF THE ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE HOUSE. • FROM THE FRONT OF OUR HOUSE THE GRADE DROPS SHARPLY TO THE EAST. • LOCATION WOLT-D REQUIRE 2 1/2 FEET OF FILL ON THE EAST END. • THE 60 FOOT LENGTH WOULD BE VERY VISIBLE FROM BOTH FRONT & BACK YARD. • QUITE A LONG ROAD WOlXD BE ADDED INTO THE WOODS WITH A TURNAROUND. LOCATION # 3 » BUILDING WOULD LINT UP WITH FRONT OF HOUSE AND MEET CODE. • LOCATED SOUTH OF THE HOUSE WITHIN 50’ OF THE SOUTH LOT LINE. • BUILDING IS RUNNLNG EAST & WEST WITH GARAGE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE. • REQUIRES THE REMOVAL OF 52 MAPLE TREES FOR BUILDING & DRIVEWAY. • ADDING ELECTRIC SERVICE BECOMES MORE OF A PROBLEM. • FROM THE FRONT OF OUR HOUSE THE GRADE DROPS SHARPLY TO THE EAST. » LOCATION WOULD REQUIRE 4 1/2 FEET OF FILL ON THE EAST END. • BUILDING WOULD REALLY STICK UP IN THE AIR AND BE VERY VISIBLE. • QUITE A LONG ROAD W OULD BE ADDED INTO THE WOODS FROM THE WTST. « ROAD GRADE WOULD DROP DOWN HILL STEEPLY FROM THE GARAGE DOOR. • A 140’ SIDEWALK WOULD HAVE TO BE BUILT INTO THE WOODS. SIZE VARIANCE WOULD LIKE A GOOD SIZED WOOD WORKING AND REPAIR SHOP FOR MY OWN PERSONAL USE. CURRENTLY RENT A STORAGE LOCKER FOR OLD FURNITURE AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ARE STORED AT A FARM 180 MILES AWAY. CURRENTLY HAVE SEVERAL CARS, TRAILERS AND SNOWMOBILES PARKED OUTSIDE WHICH TENDS TO LOOK JUNKY. WANT TO BUILD A FORD COUPE HOT ROD AND NEED SOME PLACE INSIDE TO ASSEMBLE PARTS AND START CONSTRUCTION. MARCH 25, 1994 CITY OP ORONO - BOILDING PBRMIT APPLICATION Ir- Total Fee: $ Entered By: •Cate Received: Date Approved: Permit #: ATT information MUST BB SUBMITTED IN FULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE STARRED (See Check-off List Enclosed) M applicant ISs (circle one) CONTRAC-OR JOB SITE ADDRESS: - - - - ZIP NAME OP OWNER: /yiOcy/iK?, /Do/v MAILING ADDRESS:CITY: (work) V72-VJO^ PHONE: (heme) 2.T- ZIP; CONTRACTOR: /ktJ///?/lOS M0t.70n^. S^77^^.. .l PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: STATE LICENSE: # CITY:ZIP: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER : MAILING ADDRESS:___ NAME: ____ PHONE: CITY:ZIP REGISTRATION TYPE OF WORK: New X Addition Demo Remodel/Alterntion MoveAccessory Structure Renovate_ _ Land Alteration OfU A- J=^AT7r?Q STORIES:/ NO. OF BEDROOMS:GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land) : S-------- I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge above is complete and accurate; that Hn-firfinCT Code* that Iordinances and codes of the City and with the State Building Cod^ t^^^ understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit, and that the work will be in acco^ance with t.he approved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE:DATE V /* CITY OF QRONa Z7- riT5f«l ion the t I and Ii i '-yfi -J| 5*^^' •v'Sf'T' ■ : '^.-• •. 1 ..’.:;!.? .4* \f ‘r .*.• 4. ^twrth'f ■■'•■,. . • *. .Z' i -..c*-n:^-.«^r ‘f>V';^r; "'. -'Jm -.vr^ -v>v'K>/‘'.r •''■•:Ne9*»*o?*e Tn <<xy I • ’**• . ..*>■. - '»• •Ci9ei»JEV AODKI ;*r. in. T0 P^.V 15* 1 ^ OuTlpy 4 n M 40?. 06 *»•< • (2) (M) IV ?5 fi.f5 02)(g?g)' (525^ (6) = ••••>•-. •»•; •9 0 > GOvT I3i9. T?NOR^H m ■a- c /• •• lOT I • r« •i I ^ECqvj .................J6 ---------------- uirr (S?i,;,i ESTAYC —lLj*li_-------- •*• </ " **** v-^ ^ •ir! ■* *• *• ^ ^ SK- ■tf • - -'Vi.*.''•u --*;=•'■-'*■■‘i- paSau:': v.‘ . :o.*^%-.?*. s' ‘v 4 4* • • . /Uw«^ %• *• fV*.*" •• • ' • • f '.J.- .' ;• •S > ..' ^ *•' '* . • >4• • ur * ^ •• « i *•* .i;» ;• i .• -.-. / *' ^ . • * . • *. - • . ■..,‘r • 4* /I ^ 1)1. if I s m i r • r ; V «»♦ DATE 05/25/94 vjCMTCMOOS 'V * 'V.VWW'AOOO . IV' OWEE HAME. v)l<(^TA)(l»AVEA >:<7 « HAHE/ADDR 58 04-117-25 25 0001 00058 AOOItESS, UNASSXGNEO JEA»ME T ARNSTRONB .JEAN T ARKSTEONB 255 NMTN ARM LANE WUND M4 55544 I <^ya9mk name•*\■<vITAXPAYER NAME/AOOfI •,J^8R0I»: AOOR NAME 4-«1ITA>»AYER . ,,^^fMAME/AOOR f 47J 04-117-25 25 0004 04480 NORTH ARM DR N J A MYERS ET AL TRUSTEES JANES A MYERS v80X 2800-274 CAREEREE AZ 05577 : v:-: ■ „ 58 04-117-25 25 0017 04720 NORTH ARM OR H s J A A E F UTTER •^JOHN A A ELIZASETH F UTTER 4720 N Aim DR N MCNO m 55544 r- : • WWRJAOOR ; A- K\ NAME Jj^TAHRAYER ' r.’A • • . I HEimEPlN COIKTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»MERS LIST50 04-117-25 25 0002 04420 NORTH ARM OR N 0 A A M H NINTER DON A HXNTER ♦420 NO ARM DR NEST NOUNO m 5554458 04-117-25 25 0007 04700 NORTH ARM OR N RAD HAXJALA RAYMOND 6 A DOROTHY HAXJALA 4700 NORTH ARM OR hound MN 55544 50 04-117-25 24 0001 00215 NORTH ARM LA JEANNE T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 255 NORTH ARM LANE hound m 55544 f ’ •^v'total batch 005 00009 #;REPORT NO. PZ435401 PACT 7 ,j!4’58 04-117-25 25 0005 04440 NORTH Am OR N 0 A L IVERSON DANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 4440 NORTH ARM OR hound W 55544 58 04-117-25 25 0015 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO J A A E F UTTER JOHN A A ELIZABETH F UTTER 4720 NORTH ARM OR M ORONO MN 55544 58 04-117-25 24 0004 04590 NORTH ARM DR N 8 L A J R HAGLUNO BARRY L A JANICE R HAGLUNO ♦590 NORTH ARM OR H hound MN 55544 ■ ^ iVV ,*v . •••• • Hr’ • V< •• ' facts represented are an accurate AM) T«ir date ■“ J ' V» *» * 7J* If ‘ t • t I > : 4v:i.- : : VC*-.,*. if • r,7'• «•' ' ‘ • r«.‘i ‘ A* ' kT ^• ’ *'*^1 ;^J t i t •>•*1. »* .* i i; I' i'^ ':J/PA/^rO/^^i/^y^y ~ . • " • ^,. \ro^^y^s>/^ysyCO ;'t:i vl ... /?C»^ !^//r?f^ .' . .‘%. \ ‘ ,7. /* //ary^ /fry^ /P/v*f^^ '...■» .. •*, -f '*,; ;5^-- V- » • ':T ' V • *.-^ •> •»■•. ■’->v**' • • •' . ^>/v^ V .4’ :- . 'it •;c. .. - jp>.' • . !/•' ■ -f%,v-.. • • • # m DM !- ^^/4f:/yr>o ryo'T TO SCfvvC ------------— ? •• \ r— /. • ISt'< ' J t. 'A\"'' g-lA . W . . r. f . :srrT>e.m^fr O -•^^;-S'xs^.. ** ♦\; %.v - -•• - i ; n . * • t ' . .' a r;i tT - . . i' ’ • • » ' ' *•' «•* ’ • A= . .4 * > • 4 • * •« . * r • * V . wm %• tif. .>:: i.-; rr..;^ y fe: :•; ‘V .•• «. »•< .^ • - >•» -i JlV.-.PI'':^ pv. ,'■fe'ra-f-sic. ’ •' i •*^ '.‘^ V‘ -. -i 'Sj«*« - •» *• .v j .55:^ •7?/ 1 SZ /,,. r / ^U'e/■ A/ ^trc:. t-f/r- Z3 Z/7er!f^y ^e/’/r er? ^ 2S • 77 /.y or- y* 'y cA>rrtr.'>*^''<//rr^^,,.jr^tf^ M. Ct^r:r/ >^rrr</rr A/re /j’ur'S^ oA A/re ^As/e oA-r^rA^f^i rCeT/luJU^^ L /f?y..rVt> u.’•i=‘r u .1 /■ ;s-. t V:,/-r.:‘>ui r. V ' 0^/:^^7/OAt/ CA/ 77fB of^ 7WS Z^>//y \ r Th€ £«st 402.86 feeet of the North 418.9 feet of the South 854,5 feet of the Southwest k of the ^Northwest \ of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, said 854.5 feet being meoaured along the easterly and westerly lines of said Southwest k of the Northwest k* Together with road easements shown In Document Number 898587, files oT the Registrar of Titles. Hennepin County exM • 'r/’ .• A? . - X'c-j'i-^'^ ^ W-^ ^---------------------------------------------- ^■' •• • ••irwcd' ....... ■■ ‘M - ■ i'" » .- • *i c*. A ^ ' • w.i"7 . ^0' ♦•r"* •> %.Vi * % ■« I •* .»'*•• Vfe, 0^ 'I gyv» <2^^* • ^’ -. *J3 li«.y ' • • - *i> if pZ*^ •. 3S8 ■ /^ - ^f4:AvvX‘ .- i ■■ ■'.r'^irr'- V VI 'fj ■SL-Toe.fTM^ .; :..V| \;^ -l?'i- - • - iq^:-aweo rM ■# .-• - - •—I ; IOCS'S ; i - .. .» • - *• • ** \ - €• '; 'i? *''V^s; .i':'..; J*> n I ot uT^f-;Zr >t ' -. I ! i’’'- V ;■ '-'s i-'■■'•■ .1 •','. .^,'t • - •-l» « \ 1^ « • .w * fxiju<ve sePTic.'...f5AT/^ >y .A : -V '* •;> - -=-, C- A-^-'.. V. • *■' ' - -»r^ gp.«- .M iK&a,.:2! **»> ■ •»'..■MDON A, WINTER .^620 N. ARM DR. MOUND, MN 55364 •ft .r' \ ; • rW*" TMim?m mm - ■■ m ..' >.' t4» •'< ' /!: M: - >--i C-7^ , • • •>• .;■.->■> » V • 'ri'V'v^ .k ;-1 jv*^www»>r- § 10.03 ) y \ \ \ \ V V;\ \V / •ff.f Subd 7 ^ne Building Per Lot. Except,^ the case of Planned ResidentialWelopments meet all required setback s2i^rdsop-en existing dwe^xng whi^ new principal structure is bein^scpir^ructed. Such permit shall be issued for a period of 3 months^^^dnv extensions must the City and shall expir^^^on i^uance of a certificate of occupancy for the new strupture and suchs^ructure removed. Source: Ob^inance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-^l>4-86 SubdC 8. Lots to Face Streets. Each lot s public st^e^t^or appropriate private easement. face on a - - - - - - -Subd. 9. A^essory Buildings. A. Time of Construction. No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. B. Height Restrictions. No accessory building in the "R" District shall exceed the height of the principal building, nor shall an accessory building exceed 30 feet in height. Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 C. Area Restrictions. In all "R" Districts no accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square except that accessory structures in excess of 1,000 square feet will be allowed under the following conditions: 1. Not more than one Oversized Accessory Structure (OAS) shall be permitted on any property. An "Oversized Accessory Structure" is defined as an accessory structure of foot print area in excess of 1,000 square feet, except that the following non-roofed accessory structures which exceed 1,000 s.t. footprint area are not considered as "Oversize Accessory Structures", but are subject to the special setback restrictions Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (D): - Tennis courts - Pools, when pool basin structure (excluding non- encroachment-type patios) is greater than 1,000 s.f. "1 I - Paddocks or arenas ORONO CC 255 (4-1-84) § 10.03 2. Oversized regulated by the following table: Accessory Structures are Lot Area 0-1.99 acre 2.00- 3.00 acre 3.01- 3.50 acre 3.51- 4.00 acre 4.01- 4.50 acre 4.51- 5.00 acre 5.01- 6.00 acre 6.01- 7.00 acre 7.01- 8.00 acre 8.01- 9.00 acre 9.01 acre or more Maximum Individual Accessory Structure Pnntprint Area 1.000 s.f. 1,^00 s.f. 1.400 s.f. 1.600 s.f. 1.800 s.f. 2.000 s.f. 2,200 s.f. 2.400 s.f. 2.600 s.f. 2.800 s.f. 3.000 s.f. Maximum Allowed Total of All Accessory Structure Footprint Areas* on a Property 2.000 s.f. 2,400's.f> 2.800 s.f. 3.200 s.f. 3.600 s.f. 4.000 s.f. 4,400 s.f. 4.800 s.f. 5.200 s.f. 5.600 s.f. 6.000 s.f. . Excluding non-roo£ed tennis courts, pools, paddocks, arenas 3. Any oversize Accessory Structure shall be subject to the following conditions: a) No such accessory structure shall •vhin a reouiied yard area (principal structure be located within a requiiea ya structure shall be nearer setbacks must be met). ^ ii^e of the principal residence the front lot line than the „ structure shall be located less strict principal structure setbacks apply. b) The maximum height for such u IT Kia n• nr th0 d©fin0d or uno pri”iE°a? relidl^ce^structure on the property, whichever is less. c) Such structure shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in writing wit the City as follows: i. No future subdivision will be approved that places ‘he structure within a lot that^has^no prinlipal structure, period in which the oversized approval may grant a finit a nT-incical structure, inaccessory structure may remain without a end of tliif ptrfo»^ov^r=acTe^s^oV^^^^^ he removed if no principal structure has been constructed. ORONO CC 255-i (8-14-89) I § 10.03 ii. If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the given size of accessory building. iii. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure as defined herein shall remain. • Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the chain of title of the property. Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 D. Location. No detached garages or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake and rear yard adjacent to a street, accessory buildings located within the street or rear yards of such lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B), Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) except that detached garages may be located 10 feet from the street or rear lot line when doors face away from the street and a turn-around is provided on site. This section shall not apply to lakeshore lots divided by roadways or corner lots. Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 1. Location of Principal Building to Lakeshore. No principal building shall be located closer than 75 feet to the natural ordinary high water mark of a lake abutting the property. This lakeshore setback shall be determined as the mean horizontal distance between the natural ordinary high water mark on the lakeshore and the allowable building line. 2. Variance From Lakeshore Setback. Any application for a variance from the requirements of Item 1 above shall be referred to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for its approval before final action by the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 155 Effective Date: 2-14-74 Y- ORONO CC 255-2 (4-1-84) <//f '/^ p b PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ROBERT MELAMED OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. FRENCH LAKE OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA desenfiffcn Lof / B/ocA /, frtnch Lake of Ofone 0 ; tnarKe.r’ Mi.^r -Seu icve/ aho*^ ate AweJ i/pon an 9«k5("Hcc/ f^ote ! As cf Matrix T4. fk^tMcc,jrt uffder C»fts^rui»f,<sn. ^ie^t , IlLSCKiniON lifSlGNFnH'l ■Sr b»< ^Ir !■» xlV- /' ^ ■- ■f: C()lll\ C;K()\HIK(., IV PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ROBERT MELAMED OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. FRENCH LAKE OF QRONO HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA /i PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TIM TRAFF IN COLWELL ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA Inff Mrnl; Lot 2. Ilact I. COLMLl UOIIIM. "?• 0 «0 joel_n^T4-T_J ------1 Scale In All Mftfinpt a/« M « i>i sit;NFn HY Dt-SCkJIMION C(t|l!\ lV (,K(PROPOS; HEN1SISA8i^OUNTY;MINNE! ION FOR IN ESOTA SCALE DATE JOB NO J"WOO' 2-l-5*4 93-^i