Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-27-1995 Council Packet
NOTE EARLY START' AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995, 6:45 P.M ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item’" on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1.6:45 P.M. ASSESSMENT HEARING Willow Drive North - 650’ north of Highway 12 Intersection Npv 2 Y ♦2. CONSENT AGENDA -Resdi^h f 199^ APPROVAL OF MLNUTES •3. Regular Meeting of November 13, 1995 ■" 4. Special Meeting of November 14, 1995 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION CO.MMENTS PL^LIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMLMSTRATOR’S REPORT *5. ^2057 James Nystrom. 1745 Concordia Street - Variances - Resolution *6. #2079 Rick Perry, 440 Willow Drive South - Variances - Resolution 7.Septic System Conformance Agreement - Thomas & Pauline Bouchard, 1860 Shoreline Drive MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGLNEER REPORT CITY /VDMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 8.Sewer Interceptor Reconveyance Agreement 9.Delinquent Utility Assessment Roll - Resolution 10.1996 Meeting Schedule 11.1996 Fee Schedule - Ordinance and Summary Ordinance 12.Fire Service Contract with the City of Long Lake 13! Police Service Contracts with the Cities of Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park 14.Dmg Testing Policy 15.City^Administratoi >a!ary Adjustment CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*16.) LICENSES (*17.) BILLS I •.i ^. i, Mi EARLY START 1 id AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995, 6:45 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 11/23 11/24 11/27 11/29 12/04 12/04 12/06 12/11 12/25 12/26 HOLIDAY - Thanksgiving Day Observed HOLIDAY Council meeting 6:45 p.m. Truth In Taxation Hearing 7:00 p.m. Park Work Session 6:30 p.m. Park Commission 7:15 p.m. Reconvened Truth in Taxation Meeting 7:00 p.m. (if required) Council meeting (last scheduled meeting of 1995) Holiday - Christmas Holiday ■ — - Public A ttendance Meeting Date C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please fill out the intormation REQUESTED BELOW FOR Ollfl CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 5.. 6. 7.. 8. 9. 10.. 11.. 12.. 13. 14. 15. 09119S.4 i • '''TrnKiTH.r*• m otyolOrofx) Iteiic# 0* H«aiing on Piopoe«d At»«aini« I % TO WHOli rr IMV COWCERM: fMice is hereby o»^en that the cch^ erSI meet at 6:45 p m. on 27 1995. in ^ Orono Council Chamoers. 27*80 Katley Parkway to pass upon the proposed assessment tor the improvem^^ the ifSefsection ol Trunk Highway 12 and 650 feel north on Willow Drive. The proposed assessmem roH is on file for pubic inspection at the aty cterk’s office. The total an^ount of the proposed assessment « $38,696 60. Written or oral obiections wifl be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessmet unless a signed, written obieclion is filed with the cierk prior lo the hearing or presented to the presiding offtcer at the hearing. The counai may upon such ix)tice consider any ot^eciion to tne amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adtoumed meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.It an assessment is contested or there IS an adfourned hearing, the toliowmg procedure will be followed. 1. The city will present its case first by calling wTir>esses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits After each witness has testified, the contesting parly will be allowed to Questions. This procedure will be repealed ’ with each witness until neither side has L. ccjhc:: {^^-2 NOV ? T 1995 frry/}: 2!^ASer the city has preserved al its evidence, me obfector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the obtecior desires. The same procedure for questioning the crty^ wftr^sses will be followed with the obiector^ wrtnesses.3. The obiector may be represented by 4. Minnesota rules of evidence wiy not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to me coufKfl as to me weight of items of evidence or testimony pressed to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded , 6 At the close of presentation of evidence, the obiector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and me law No new evKience may be presented at mis point. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the mayor or clerk of the city within 30 days after the adoption of me assessment and tiling such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon me mayor or clerk. Dated November 6. 1995 /S/' Dorothy M Halim City Clerk (Published m The Laker and Pioneer Nov. 13 arxj20,1995) Affidavit of Pubiication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. [LB.) The printed _f'd^lirn iWJ jOPMCtKrlidf?' which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for successive weeks: It was first published Monday, 17the /-2.- day of.'iim^Lj'} 192£_, and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday. Subscribed and sworn to me on this (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $11.72 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above maner: $11.72. (3) Rate actually charged for above matte< $6.80 per inch. Each additional successive weex: $4.90. COUNCIL MEETiuj REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 7 1995 CITY OF ORONO DATE: November 22, 1995 ITEM NO:/ Department Ap|»i>val: Name Ron Mootk Tttle City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: ' Assessment Hearing - Willow Drive Reconstruction Project The Willow Drive reconstruction project is now substantially completed. The total cost of the project is $154,786.40. The two property owners directly adjacent to the project have been notified that the city proposes to assess the two properties for 25% of the project costs. The total amount to be assessed is $38,696.60. Each of the properties is proposed to be assessed $19,348.30. The hearing is an opportunity for the property owners to ask questions and provide comments to the Council regarding the proposed assessments. Hearing Process 1. Mayor opens the public hearing for the assessment hearing on the Willow Drive Reconstruction Project. 2. Mayor confirms receipt of affidavit of publication. 3. Administrator explains the purpose of the public hearing. 4. Mayor asks for comments from the public. 5. After public has had an opportunity to speak - the Mayor closes the public hearing. 6. Discussion by Council. 7. Motion by Council. Assessment Policy The city has historically assessed the full costs of public improvement projects to the benefitting property owners (i.e. sewer projects with have included the reconstruction of local streets as part of the project). In recent years, due to coun rulings that have placed some limitations on the amount of assessments, the city has assessed somewhat less than the full costs, with general property taxes funding the remainder. Eequest for Coundl Actioa Con&iutd page 2 of 3 NoTcmber 22, 1995 Assessment Hearing - Willow Drire Recoi ruction Project Because Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway reconstruction projects have a specifically designated funding source that provides partial funding for the projects, the city has addressed the assessment issue a bit differently for MSA projects. Although the city has not developed a clear policy regarding the assessment of single family residential properties for MSA projects, the cii, of the costs of MSA roadway reconstruction projects. The general reasoning behind the assessment of commercial and industrial properties is that the MSA roads, which by definition serve as collector roadways; provide substantial benefits or services to the commercial and industrial properties. These include bringing traffic and customers to the properties, and providing roadways designed to handle the level of traltic and the heavier types of vehicles that serve the properties, or that are used oy the businesses, located on the commercial and industrial properties. Based on this policy, the properties adjacent to the project are proposed to be assessed for 25% of the project costs. Assessment Appeals If the assessments are adopted, the property owners will have a 30 day period in which to appeal the assessments. A letter is attached from Cliff Otten requesting the Council not to adopt the assessment related to his property, and indicating he plans to appeal the assessment. Mr. Otten’s letter focuses on the question of whether his property benefits from the project in terms of an increase in property value. The focus on increase in value is related to the court ruling that the amount of the assessment can not e.xceed the amount by which the property increises in value due to the project. Benefits to Adjacent Properties There are s everal important benefits to the adjacent properties provided by the Willow Drive roadway reconstruction project. These include; an upgraded roadway, improved access, and increased traffic. 1.Upgraded roadway. The Willow Drive project replaces a roadway that was narrow, in poor condition, and which had a 5 ton design which is inadequate to serve the needs of the adjacent properties; with a road constructed with a 10 ton design and widened to accommodate the level of traffic and to match the new signalized intersection. At the time the Otten development was approved, there was discussion that the then- existing 5 ton design road would not be adequate in the long term to handle the level and type of traffic generated by the development. In fact the road has been steadily deteriorating. '■TiW' i Acdon ContinuedRequest for C page 3 of 3 NoTcmber 22, 1995 AssKanoit Hearing - Willow Drive Reconstruction Project 2.Improved access. The Willow Drive project is an integral pan of the reconstruction of the Willow and Highway 12 intersection, which has substantially improved access to the Otten property. Customers coming from the west and south can now conveniently access the property from Willow Drive. Prior to the signalized intersection those people had to take their chances with the almost continuous flow of traffic on Highway 12, in trying to cross two lanes of traffic from the south or make a left turn from the west. 3.Increased traffic drawn to the Willow Drive intersection. The signalized intersection has changed the character of the intersection from one that was avoided to one that now draws traffic. A significant amount of traffic that formerly used the Old Crystal Bay Road or Lake Drive signalized intersections now can use the Willow Drive intersection. The Otten business benefits significantly by increased traffic flow which now is drawn to the intersection where the business is located. .Staff Recommendation cut Although the proposed assessment is a large amount, it is a very small percentage of the total value of the properties to be assessed. The new roadway that has been desij ned to serve the level of traffic and type of vehicles generated by the adjacent properties, the improved access to the site, and the increased traffic being drawn to the intersection all provide significant benefits to the properties It is staffs recommendation that the Council adopt the proposed assessments. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Willow Drive improvement project. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE INTERSECTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 AND 650 FEET NORTH ON WILLOW DRIVE WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of the intersection of Trunk High.vay 12 and 650 feet north on Willow Drive. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1996 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.5 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1996. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3.The owner, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole or the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may thereafter pay to the county treasurer the installment and interest in process of collection on the current tax list, and he may pay the remaining principal balance of the assessment to the city treasurer. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4.The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council this 27ih day of November, 1995 Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk IQ30955 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY 12 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - P.I.D. 34-118-23 22 0014 33-118-23 11 0003 1I089S.I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 11/27/95 ADDITION CODE ADDITION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY 12 & WILLOW DR. N. 04527 02547 East Willow Woods $19,348.30 Willow Properties Addition $19,348.30 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $19,348.30 $19,348.30 (jOTTENZBR^ *0\’T:R 40 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE' November 20, 1995 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Long Lake^ MN 55356 RE Willow Drive Special Assessment Ladles/Gentlemenj that the proposed special assessment against my parcel will total $19,348.30. The assessment Is to rebuild the asphal surface. I resoectfully urge you not to adopt this assessment tole with an assIssLnt ot sl'J.348.30 to n,y property. For many vears this property has been served by asphalt roads on both the southerly and the westerly sides. The P>^esent Drive although widened to accommodate the new Highway intersection, Is the same as It always has been, an asphalt surface. Consequently, there Is no change In my situation with regard to Willow Drive as a consequence of the rebuilding of the road which you have done. The property was previously served by an asphalt road and after your work it is still serviced by an asphalt road. Since there Is no change In the service you Provide to my property (actually the drive entrance Is not as good as It was). It is not possible that the value of my property has Increased In any dollar^ amount let alone the amount of $19,348.30, by virtue of this repair work. I do hereby protest any dollar amount of any assessment against my property and will appeal the same as provided by law. Respectfully submitted. Clifford L. Otten CLOtbrk 2350 W. WAYZATA BLVD. • PO. BOX 249 ♦ LONG LAKE. MN 55356 • (612) 473-5425 • FAX # (612) 473-7232 looo.x pfTftf.Tr HBARISG PBOCZDtJBS 7s00 P.M. Mayor states - This Is the time and place for the scheduled public hearing -- - - - - - - - Mayor confirms - Recorder has affidavit of publication Administrator - Explains the purpose of the public hearing -- - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - Mayor - Ask for comments from the public. After public has had an opportunity to speak on the matter the Mayor closes the public hearing. Discussion by Council. Motion by Council Rice Law Firm, Chartered Anomeys at Law 575 West 78th Street P.O. Box 1180 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 John D. Rice Tel.(612)949 9616 Fax(612)949-9589 November 27, 1995 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 Re: Proposed Special Assessment Willow Drive and Trunk Highway 12 Dear Ms. Hallin: This office is counsel for Orono Plaza, a partnership, and Gilbert C. Braun and Anna Lou Ella Braun, Trustees, regarding the matter of the City's proposed special assessment for work done at the intersection of Willow Drive and Trunk Highway 12 in the City of Orono. Those parties are the owners of Outlot B, Willow Properties Addition, the property westerly of Willow Drive, which property is proposed to be assessed a portion of the costs of the work done at the intersection. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061, Orono Plaza and Gilbert C. Braun and Anna Lou Ella Braun, Trustees, object to and protest the levy of any assessment against Outlot B, Willow Properties Addition, for the cost of the project. The objection to the levy and the assessment is as follows. Our information is that the City of Orono does not levy special assessments on residential property for improvement projects funded by state aid funds; and that special assessments will be levied upon commercial property for some part of the cost of such improvement projects. Such a practice denies due process and equal protection of the laws to the owners of commercial property. Pending receipt of information on costs and allocation, objections regarding such matters are reserved. Yours very truly. r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 13.1995 ROLL \ % ^The Council met on the ibovc date wth the folloNving members present: Mayor Bdward> ^ Callahaiv Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley, ^ JoEllen Hurr. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and > Zonmg Administrator Michael Uattron, Public Works Director Jo** Cierhardson, (..ity Engineer Shawn Gustafson, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Caiiahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p m (*#1) CONSE’iT AGENDA Items #6. 8, 11, 12. 15. 16. and 17 were added to the Consent Agenda. Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#2) REFUNDING OF *89 AND *85 BONDS - CALL FOR BOND SALE - RESOLUTION #3628 Moorse reported that the City has two bond issues that have reached, or will soon reach, their call dates This is the time when the City has an opportunity to retund those issues at a lower interest rate. The City has been working with Carolyn Drude of Ehlcrs Associates, the City’s bond consultant, to determine whether it would make sense to refund at this time It has been estimated that the sale would result in a savings of over $120,000 in interest over the life of the bonds. Goetten asked if there would be any premium involved. Drude said no premium would be paid to the current bond holders. Hurt moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3628 calling for a retlinding bond sale on December II. 1995 Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0 Callahan asked what interest rate could be obtained. Drude said the City would be replacing interest rates of 6 25% to 8.25% with an estimated 4% to 4 8% interest for a similar length of time. Kelley asked if the bond was in one series Drude said the resolution was in one series for cost savings but would be separarated out later for bookkeeping purposes. The new bonds would also have a call option. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 AFFROVAL OF MINUTES (•#3) REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 23,1995 Huit moved, Gocttcn seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of October 23, 1995. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. FARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Park Commissioner McDermott reporteo that Highwood Nature Trail was at the point of completion. The sign and picnic table will be installed in the spring. McDenrott said the Saga HiU Group has reported they are proceeding with their grant ^plicationSw The group has 30 grant proposals out for consideration. The Council w as informed of the Park Commission plans for access to the Lowry Woods Nature Area McDermott said City Attorney Barrett had reviewed the private access and found that no legal access existed to the nature area Under consideration is the purchase of a small comer of land which would provide access to area The comer of land is separated trom the mam parcel ot land by the county road and is possibly ot no use tor its owner. Easements would probably be required if this option is possible to gain a pathway into the trail area. McDermott asked Council for their direction The Council members were in agreement on looking at the options available but felt more information was required for review. Callahan suggested the Commission inquire about the availability of the comer piece of land. McDermott intbimed the Council that the Park Commission's majority did not want the Luce Line to be paved but left in its current state The Park Commission would like the Council's concurrence in order to represent the City at the meetings regarding this issue. Callahan asked to discuss the issue under the agenda item Hurt said she was in support of paving the trail PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There was no representative of the Planning Commission present. PUBLIC COMMENTS Darcy Otto asked that the recent penalty assessed on the Otto’s after-the-fact application be reconsidered due to the large engineering costs already incurred by the Otto's. No motion was made by a Council member for reconsideration. Callahan informed Otto that the penalty was a matter of policy, and he was inclined to maintain the penalty. —^ MINirreS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING dELD ON NOVEMBER 13» 1995 ZONING ADMLNISTRATOR’S REPORT (#4) JOHN O’SULLIVAN, J340 SHORELINE DRIVE AND 2420 SHADYW'OOD ROAD - COUNCIL DIRECTION M^)usth asked the Council for their direction regarding the expanded service use bong offered at O'Sullivan's in Navarre. The original floor plan was reviewed, which was approved for refrigerated food displays, four seating tables, and food preparation on site requiring a health department permit. There presently is a new independent counter service area with stools The seating has decreased from 16 to 8 An espresso bar has been added A cashier is available at the food service counter Mabusth said a service window was being installed this summer and construction was stopped by the building inspector for lack of a permit. Mabusth asked the Council if they saw any need tor a co^tionai use permit for the increased food service. Jabbour and Goetten said they saw no problem with the food service area Kelley asked what was approved under the original site plan for seating Mabusth reviewed the floor plan approved with the land use application. The application was approved for multiple uses with gas and food. Kelley asked about the adequacy of parking and tying in seating to parking stalls. Mabusth said a variance had been approved due to th? inadequate number of stalls. Goetten suggested no further expansion be allowed Callahan said Stalf could determine the current status of the seating and set a limit. Mabusth responded that there was the actual decrease in seating but only an increase in food service Jabbour said the City should not prohibit merchants from making changes within their stores. He added that a store is required to keep up with market changes to stay profitable. Hurr asked how the service window would work. O’Sullivan said it would be a sliding window for walk-up service only Goetten asked if there was adedquate parking for this service, and O'Sullivan said that there was. Callahan said there may be a time where parking could become a problem and asked Staff to keep watch over the traffic flow. He suggested taking pictures of the current layout of the store. O Sullivan asked if a conditional use permit would be required for the window and was told no. He was infonned he could go ahead with installing the sliding window. The issue of exterior storage use at the Martin station was addressed. O Sullivan has until May 1, 1996 to cease the temporary storage use at the station property. MINUTES OK THE REGULAR ORONO CUT COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 /JLi. CSuHivan, Council Direction * Continued) Goeften inquired about a possible purchase of the church property by O Sullivan He informed her that he has an ootion to ourchase the orooertv continaent on rczoninu Four potential site plans arc currently being dravsn. O’Sullivan said he would meet with City StafTonce the plans are done. Plans include retail and office space A meeting wUl also take place with nciahbors of the propertv (•#5) #2022 R. MELAMED/R. LAl'ER, 920 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3629 Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3629 Vote: Ayes 5. Nays 0. (*#6) #2031 BRUCE R. KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3630 Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3630. V oie; Aves 5, Navs 0. I#7) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM. 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES REQUEST FOR RECONSIUERXI ION Mr. Nystrom and his architect, Greg Frazee. were present Gafi'ron reported that the Council had moved to reconsider the application at the October 23 meetinu The existing house with deck is mainly located within the 0-75’ zone with a detached garage and drivewav The initial Planning Commission review lead to applic^t oroDOsing removal of the house and garage and replacement The Council approved the application with conditions that no encroachment of the 0-75' zone occur and minimum 10’ setbacks be met on each side of the home. The applicant requests a variance for a lesser siue seioacK Fra/ce commented that the applicant responded to the requests of the Planning Commission to meet certain reouiremenis The application was then unanimouslv recommended for approval by the Planning Commission but rejected by the Council. Frazee was of the opinion that the Planning Commission saw the many positives that would take place with the proposal for the propertv, but the Council did not do the same, Frazee reviewed the current layout of the hou.se and garage on the lot. The house is located 23’ from the shoreline and 1.6’ from the side setback with the garage on the lot line The neighborine house is located on the lot line Frazee said Nystrom liked the closeness to the lake but saw the need for update and realized the problem with hardcover dunnu the Planning Commission review 1 he proposal was then amended to include a new house built at the 75’ line The garage, which is currently side loading with alot of driveway hardcover, would be centered on the lot with one parking stall off to the side eliminating the majority of the hardcover I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 ^#7 • #2057 Jirncs Nj'stron! • Continued) Frazee said the pix)blcni with meeting! the side setback lies with the desire to keep a low DTotile. an understated cottase look, so as not to dominate the neighborhood To decrease the floor plan would cause the applicant to build a two-storv to gain the needed space Frazee asked the Council to reconsider their decision, taking into account the beneflts gained bv the proposal, concessions and expenses made, especially the house being moved out of the 75' zone Nystrom commented that the house and garage as they exist are contrarv' to the City comprehensive plan He felt he was taking a proactive approach with his proposal. Nystrom said he was only asking for 12" to ma.ximize his space as he does not wish to have a two-storv home Callahan noted that the three Council members present at the prior application review were Kelley, Hurr, and himself Gaflron added that there w as also the issue of the overhang. The code allow s for a 1-1/2* overhang. The proposed overhang is 2 2’ with the additional 6" variance resulting in a 7- 1/2* setback from the drip line to the lot line With the additional variance. Gaflron said there is still a better setback from the south but closer on the north side It was noted that one side of the residence is available for emergency vehicles to go around Hurr said, because in replacement we consider this as a new lot, she saw no hardship to allow the house to not meet code Even with the positive changes. Hurr felt it would set a bad precedent to allow the variances Callahan noted that with the bad situation as is represented by the property now, the chamies result in many positives Frazee added that the applicant was also taking a perfectly good garage and rebuilding it to meet hardcover goals Goetten questioned why the house cannot be redesigned as the overage is only 6 ” on each side Frazee said the interior would be afl'ected bv 1' and would result in too narrow a headroom in the master bedroom with the slanted walls 1 he master bedroom width was said to be 15* with the slope beginning at 4'6" Nystrom said he realized the Planning Commission and Council made exceptions in other cases and asked that it also be done here A neiuhborinu property was cited as an example but noted to have uained a variance due to a drainage problem. Hurr commented that a variance requires a condition under which there be a hardship, not self-created. Frazee reitereaied the need to maintain a low profile and not overpower the neiuhborhood. !L...1.1 A f... iMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVTMBER 13,1995 (#7 - #2057 James Nystrom - Continued) Goctten asked Nystrom what his rationale was for the hardship, Nystrom said he desired a cape cod stvle home with the master bedroom on the second storv. Frazee called it a modified shingle style. The design of the roof when reduced w ould result in a less effective master bedroom. Nystrom said the tradeoffs of the proposal w ere so positNe that he did not feel the side setback variance should be denied Kelley said he would reconsider the application. Kelley moved, Callahan second^, to ^ approve Application #2057 for the 6” side setback variance and a 2b overhang for a 8 variance and an overhang encroachment of 1.2'. Gafffon explained the need for the secondary variance for the overhang. Hurr asked what the hardship was for the overhang. Frazee said the main concern was with the slope. He asked to have both variances granted but said the overhang could be adjusted. Callahan said he could recall 6-8 homes along this immediate shoreline who were granted variances. With the numerous positive changes of this proposal. Callahan said he was inclined to grant the vanances for this application Jabbour said he had a problem with the eaves, noting the need for space for emergency vehicles, but saw the wisdom to grant the 6" variance. Vote: Ayes 2, Kelley, Callahan, Nays 3, Goetten, Hurr, Jabbour. Motion denied, Kelley moved. Callahan seconded, to approve the application for the 6" variance with the eaves meeting code Vote: Ayes 4. Navs 1. Hurr (-#8) #2061 ARNE WASBERG. 3134 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARLANCE RENEWAL - RESOLUTION #3631 Hurr moved. Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3631. Vote Ayes 5. Nays 0. (#9) #2065 MARFIELD/HILL/TOLES, 2455/2425/2435 SCOTCH PINE LANE - VACATION OF SCOTCH PINE LANE - PRELLMINARV SUBDIVISION APPROVAL (RE-PLAT) - RESOLUTION #3632 Callahan excused himself from the discussion of this application as it was his desire to abstain from voting since he lived in the neighborhood. Gaffron reported that the application was for the vacation of Scotch Pine Lane, a public dedicated road, and the replat of the Dicon addition, which was subdivided in 1974. This subdiv ision occurred prior to the 1975 code requirement of two acre lots The road meets current standards. r MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1W5 ()!^ - #2065 Scotch Pine Lane - Continued) Kclle>’ inquired if the HilTs had lakeshore property. Gafiron said the lot to the lakeshore was a narrow strio. The HilF$ had two seoarate tax statements Gaflron said an outlet was created by the shared dmeway serving the Hill and Martield properties. The road when vacated would be split up between the three parties The HilTs would then have one lot A portion of the cul-de-sac w ould become part of the Toles property, who will have a new driveway off ot CoRd 51 In discussions with the Long Lake Fire Department and the City Engineer, the emergency access was reviewed The current layout is excellent for emergencies but the fire department determined, with additional driveway width, the vacation could occur and still allow room for emergency vehicle staginit The Citv Engineer initiallv Questioned this decision and recommended denial. He raised the issues ot wetland easements and definition, and drainage It was determined that the current catch basin would be eliminated and filled in to allow for overland drainage. GanVon reported that the Public Works Director and Orono Police Department reviewed the orooosal and recommended aooroval The Citv would no lonuer be reauired to maintain the road As part of the packet, documentation provided by the applicants notes the problem with the public attempting to gain access to the lake via Scotch Pine Lane, which has no access. The Hennepin County Public Works Department has also given their preliminary approval The Planning Commission recommended approval bv a 4:1 vote. Gaffron said there was a problem with the high number of utility easements in the area and the concer.i with sewer lines and connections This would need to be addressed prior to final approval Gafiron noted that the pow t line running along the perimeter lot line falls outside of the proposed 10' easement It was further noted that the owners would give the n ccssary casements. Gafi'.on was asked if the City w as attempting to clean up the utility easements because of the proposal Gafiron said it was brought up by the yacation but the need was there for the easements to be addressed Gafii on questioned the vacation of the public road and the replat He noted rural zoning required two acre parcels for any new development Also, any new development would require a private road to be built to the standards which this road currently meets Gafiron questioned vacating and eliminating a road that would be required today to serve these three lots. MlNimS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#9 - #2065 Scotch Pine Lane - Continued) Jabbour said when the proposal is completed, the road would only be used by two DTOperti^, not three as it is currentlv. and would meet code. He also added that the proposal presents a nuyor contribution to hardcover reduction Gatlron asked that the Council note tlw findings that this situation is unique if they wish to allow the vacation to occur without setting a precedent. Gaffron also added that the outlot results in the Marfield property becoming a backlot. It would no longer abut a public or private road but a driveway. This would require meeting the 150® . area and setback standard. He also noted the lot sizes of the three parcels. Hurr said she saw no problem with the proposal and asked that the applicants pay for any easement resolution and the vacation. It was noted that this vacation approval is conceptual, and the re-plat requires preliminary approval as well as final approval. Goetten asked Gatfron if he approved of the proposal Gaffron said he w as here to represent the code. From a tteneral concept, he did not feel the proposal met code but would require specific findings for approval in order to avoid setting a precedent that might result in other existing 3-lot cul-de-sacs asking for the same thing. Jabbour commented that the property had good drainage Goetten said if NSP had placed their power lines in the wrong place, it would probably be their responsibility to correct it Gafffon said he did not believe the power lines would affect the driveway. Toles said that whatever it takes to gain approval to remove the hardcover was satisfactory Jabbour informed Toles that he should move the easement in case Toles would pursue remodeling of the home In the tuture. Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve preliminarv' replat, conceptual approval of the vacation of the road, and asked Staff* to bring back to Council for final approval noting the property owners to pay for costs incurred. This approval is for Resolution #3632 as drafted Vote: Aves 4. Navs 0. Abstain 1. Callahan (#10) #2066 ROBERT AND IRIS W AADE, 1487 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3633 Robert VVaade was present MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#10 - #2066 Robert and Iris Waadc - Continued) Gaffron reported that the application was for a number of variances and additions to a home located on the east side of Shoreline Drive. The house ts located within the 0-75 zone The original proposal was to add a second stor>- to the home with a 10 1. pitched roof The Plannina Commission said that this would be too much for the lot and could not recommend approval The applicant then came back with a proposal tonust a pitched roof over the existing one-stor%- home with a number ot additions^ The carm^rt ^ area is to be built in and used as lixing space The garage would be added ^ a third stall. There would be a bump out in one area, and the entr>- way would be squared off There would also be an angled addition The root would also be pitche over the carport area No height variance is required. The side setback requirement is 30V The garage is currently at 8 ’ and is proposed at 16V The carport bump out is located at 10’ where 30’ is required. The eiitrv wav and root overhang is located in the 0-75 ’ zone Regarding the average lakeshore setback line, the house to the north does not view the prooeitv The house to the south already has limited view. The Planning Commission did not feel this was an issue. The hardcover of bituminous walkway located under the deck would be changed to a non-hardcover of uravel with no underlavment A back out apron and ^rca would be created eliminating the loop Hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone would decrea^ from 39.18% to 36 14Vo Hardcover in the 75-250' zone would decrease from 16,o to 9.25 o. The lot coverage by structure is proposed at 15.37% where 15°o is allowed Waade noted that the 4’ overhangs would be eliminated and rebuilt to 1-1/2*. .All of the additions are within the original overhang depth. llurr asked if Ihere was any way to keep the lot coverage within the 15V. allowable Waade said he made an attempt to do so but was unable to create a functional t oor p an. The garage area would be increased from 2 stalls to 3 with one stall being 30’ in length. It was noted that there are no storage sheds on the propertv. GafVron reported that the 37^o overage in lot coverage amounts to 100 s.f. Hurr said it was her opinion that the lot coveraue should meet the 15*^ 0 allowable. Waaue asked if the overhang was considered. Gatfron explained that the overhang is not included in either the hardcover or lot coverage calculations Goetten said she appreciated the concern with the lot cov erage exceeding I S^/o but looked at the significant improvements to the property She expressed her appreciation of the proposal Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3633. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#10 • #2066 Robert and Iris Waade - Continued) Kcfley commented that the hardcover in the 75-250* zone, while being reduced from 15.96% to 9.25%, is allowed at 25%. He was concerned with the owner’s ability to add hardcover in the future up to the 25% allowable. It was noted that condition #2 of the resolution stipulated that the hardcover in this zone could not exceed 9.25® i without further qqrroval by the CoundL Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#11) #2074 JOHN AND KRISTEN GEHRING, 1687 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCES/CONDmONAL USE PERMIT - RESOUTION #3634 Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3634. V'ote; Ayes 5, Nays 0 (•#12) #2075 HOWARD R. ALTON HI, 1635 CONCORDIA STREET - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3635 Huir moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3635. Vote; Ayes 5. Nays 0. (Hurr was excused from the meeting at this time.) (#13) #2079 RICK PERRY, 440 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH - VARIANCES The applicant was present. Kelley asked if the amended proposal should be referred back to the Planning Commission. It was decided to proceed viith the review. Mabusth reported that the original proposal was for a 24'x23' addition to the existing garage, which is located in front of the principal structure The original proposal involved an oversized accessory structure, which exceeded the 1000 s.f allowable footprint. The original variance of 1978 approved a 5 setback for the existing garage. The Planning Commission did not address application ’s proposal to amend agreeing to bring the garage addition area of structure under 1000 s.f. The structure will be between 750 and 1000 s.f and would require a 15' side setback The footprint variance is no longer required. Mabusth said the applicant felt that the Planning Commission did not consider his request to amend the proposal The applicant was willing to reduce the size but would still require the side setback variance and variance for the intensification ot the addition in front of the principal structure I (r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#13 - #2079 Rick Peny - Continued) Mabusth noted the elevations of the property. The ability to access to the rear of the property is very tight. The only gently sloped ,vea is in the rear and is needed as an ihemate septic site. This leaves the only suitable area for expansion wthin the street yanl The amended addition at 20*x22* would be redesigned to minimize the height from the street and side. Mabusth noted that all of the neighbors have signed off on their acknowledgement forms. Callahan and Goetten said they were both at the Planning Commission meeting and did not feel that the Planning Commission erred in their actions. Callahan commented that the addition is the same as requested in the 1970 s. Mabusth said the additional area is needed for the applicant's collector cars and storage needs of a maturing family. Jabbour said he saw enough hardship to place the structure in front of the principal structure with the narrowness ot the lot for a side setback variance. He believes the applicant has the right to the garage, and the location is satisfactory due to the topography of the land. Mabusth said the Planning Commission questioned how much accessory structure should be necessary. She did note, howev er, that the addition would still keep property under the allowed total area for accessory structures on this property Callahan said an approval would not be granted for other reasons such as business use it not used for the applicant's collection. Perry said it was his desire to keep his vehicles and equipment stored inside He would like to remain living on this property and would be willing to enter into a covenant calling for elimination of the structure if he moved. Goetten said she was concerned with additional structure. Perry' said the property would not support any more structure. Jabbour said he had no problem with the application. Mabusth noted the applicant proposes reduction in structure size, the planting of landscaping and minimizing the roof line She also said the applicant was willing to execute a covenant to remove the structure if he moved The Council did not want such a covenant. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Application #2079 and directed Staff to prepare a formal resolution for Council action at the November 27, 1995, meeting. V( Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#14) #20S1 PATRICK AND NANCY WALSH, 1390 REST POINT ROAD VARUNCES - RESOLUTION #3«36 The applicants were present. Mabusth reported that the application is for mo side additions to the east and west ot the residence located out of the average lakeshore setback area and out ot the 0-75 zone. An aaoition is proposea at me entrance of tne resiaence tor a rooiea porcn i ne proposal also includes an expansion of the upper lev el, abov e the garage, and^expansion of mo bedrooms, all within the average lakeshore setback by b ’ and in the 0-75 zone. The expansion is over the first floor structure Mabusth noted that the applicant had reviewed Staffs findings prior to the Planning Commission meeting and had voluntanly amended his onginal proposal also prior to the meeting. The amended plan reduced the proposed lot coverage from 21 4 “ •. to 19 9* o. No change was made in the 0-75* zone The upper level expansion is located within the substandard street setback, 20* from the street line, requiring a variance. A hardcover variance is also required for the 75-250’ zone. The side setback requirements are met by the proposed additions. Mabusth noted the small lot size The applicant has proposed reductions in hardcover with removal of the landscaping with plastic undcriayment as well as a grade level deck used for storage. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone exists at 40 2% and is proposed at 5l.5?'o. The original proposal was for 56.3%. The proposal results in a variance ot 26 5%. The entry area will be roofed by extending the garage roof over the stoop area. Walsh said this would allow for protection of the entry from ice buildup w hich occurs with the flat roof on it now. The garage roof elevation is lower than that ot the peak of the existing house. Goetten said every one deserves a kitchen and a full bath. Jabbour agreed. The applicants were asked how they' lived without either for 17 years Callahan said the Planning Commission remarked that the additions are ones that should be in a house He added that since the lot was deemed buildable, the applicants should be allowed the amenities Kellev said he understood the need for the additions but was having difllculty with approval due to the encroachments. Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution ^3536 as proposed. Vote: Ayes 4, Navs 0. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOV EMBER 13,1995 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour asked Mabusth to report on findings at the former gas station at I960 Shoreline Drive. Mabusth said there were reports of work being done on the property A man was fourd working on the buflding and had said the County had giv^ him approval to do so xMabosth said the County had received the land through ta.x forfeiture in July ot 1995 and had the right to make use of the property. Mabusth intormed the County that the property was in residential zoning and noted the resolution on the title that restricts the use of the property The County said they were unaware of the residential zoning tor the property Jabbour commented that the abandonment of the gas station was logged as being over the year allowed to regain the temporary non-conforming use and revert^ back to the residential zoning. It was then found that repair on the roof was continuing in violation of the stop order. Mabusth again contacted the County, who stopped the work in process It was noted that the property would come on the tax fortciture list in December, 1995 Mabusth noted the neighbors were concerned over the pollution, adding that the pollution needed to be cleaned up Kelley said this falls under the attractive nuisance heading, and the County should be intbrmed. (Jabbour was excused from the meeting at this time.) Callahan asked Moorse about an appointment of a representative to a committee possibly with the watershed Moorse said it was originally a public information committee and then the Lonu Lake water quality project coordination committee, which was functioning until about one year ago Callahan said a member of the Park Commission w as asked to be on a citizens advisory committee, and he was unable to determine if this was the same committee Moorse said he thought it was another committee. engineer REPORT (*#I5) PAY REQUEST #l - OLD CRYSTAL BAV’ ROAD BIKE/HIKE TRAIL Hurr moved. Goetten seconded, to approve Pay Request #l for the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail to Hardrives. Inc . in the amount of $45,806.24 Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0 (»#16) PAY REQUEST #2 AND FINAL PAVEMENT - NAVARRE LIFT STATION NO. 7 Hurr moved. Goetten seconded, to approve Pay Request #2 and Final Payment for the Navarre Lift Station #7 to Ford Construction Co , Inc , in the amount of $51,387.71. Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (*#17) FAY REQUEST 02 - WILLOW DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Hurr moved, Gocttoi seconded, to ipprovc Pay Request #2 for the Willow Drive Street IxnprovcTncn ts to B tfTalo Bituminous in the amount of $57,824.89. Vote. Ayes 5, Na\s 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#18) POLICE AND FIRE SERVICE CONTRACTS W1TH THE Cl l Y OF LONG LAKE Moorse reported that the contracts were for one year extensions of the three year agreements for Orono providing Long Lake with police service and Long Lake providing (>ono with fire service. Callahan asked that this issue be addressed at the next Council meeting Kelley asked for figures on w hat the percentage of cost for Orono w as ot the police and fire budget.s, whether it was going up or down, or it it was being tracked KeLe>’ said if Orono was paying more of the total budget, the City slvruld know. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to table this item to the November 27, 1995, meeting of the Council. Vote Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#19) DANGEROUS W EAPO.NS AND ARTICLES - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Kelley asked Moorse how this amendment would alTect hunters and it a permit would be required He questioned if this pertained to priv ate property Barrett said no hunting is allowed within a municipality Kelley clarified that this amendment would mean that no hunting would be allowed on private or public property. Moorse said the present ordinance says a person cannot discharge a firearm without a permit The City's concern is with a person carrying a shotgun and the lack of control the Citv has over carrying of weapons Kelley said he would like more information on the ordinance He is concerned about such uses as on the firing range and w alking off the range onto private property and being in violation of an ordinance. Barrett said the w ording of the ordinance did not tlow and needed rev ision. It was suggested that Moorse work with Barrett on rewriting the ordinance. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVXMBER 13,1995 (il9 - Dangerous Weapons Ordinance Amendment - Continued) Call^^ moved, Kelley seconded, to table consideration ol this isaic. Vote; Aves 3, Navs 0. (#20> 1996 SEW ER AND W ATER FEES Mooise reported staff recommended a 3*'* increase in the sewer and water tees at the last budget work session. Moorse prosided a summary for the Council ot the projected costs for improvements of the water plant It w as determined that this expense could be handled ox'cr multiple years if the w ater fees were annually increased a reasonable amount. Goetten asked if the cost would have to be paid o\er one year, how it could be budgeted over a different time length. Moorse said an in-house loan would occur and be paid back through the increased water fees. Callahan noted the high cost of the proposed improvements. Moorse commented that the water treatment plant was 25 years old and has never received any updating up to this time but now required maintenance He is discussing with other cities with similar water treatment plants, who have gone through rehabilitations, to see what can be done to save money. Kelley asked what amount was in the ftind Moorse said the balance was about $70,000. Kelley said it would take a 2.4% increase just to keep up with normal cost increases and was concerned it would not cover the rehabilitation needed Moorse said the cost of sewer per quarter would increase from $69 to $72. Water tees in the Navarre area would increase from $20 10 to $20.70 and from $1.71 to $1.76 per thousand gallons Callahan said as a practical matter, he saw that the increase was necessary. Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve a 3'*/b increase in water and sewer fees to be retlected in the 1996 Fee Schedule. Vote: Ayes 3. Nays 0 (#21) NON-UNION COMPENSATION FOR 1996 - RESOLUTION #3637 Moorse reported that the adjustment is for non-union compensation for 1906 for pay and insurance contributions The general pay increase is proposed at 2.85%; insurance contnbution increase from $301 to $313 5i) per month; and mileage increase from $0 29 to SO 30 per mile. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETINC HELD ON NOVTMBER 13.1995 (#21 • Noo-Union Compensation for 1996 - Continued) Callahan noted that the pay raise and insurance adjustment is in conformitv' with the police contract The mileage change is similar to what has been previously done and is consistent with IRS mileage reimbursement rate Callahan moved. Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution P3637 approving the 199o non union employee compensation adjustments as outlined in the Request for Council Action Vote; Ayes 3. Nays 0 (#22) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT - WEST HENNEPIN REC^ CLING COMMISSION > RESOLUTION #363S Moorse reported that the main portion of the agreement regards the coordinator's salary and extends the agreement through 1999. Orono's share to the commission tor the coordinator's salary is $2700 The coordinator also handles the household hazardous waste collection and Goodwill recy cling etforts, Gerhardson noted that the commission originally started with only a couple cities and has expanded to the present seven cities Kelley mov'cd. Callahan seconded, to adopt Resolution #3638 extending the term of the West Hermepin Recycling Joint Powers Agreement to December 31, 1999. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0 (#23) KELLY AVTNUE EASEMENT ACQUISITION Moorse reported that in replacing the sanitary sewer line along with raising the road on Kelly Avenue, there was found a need to realign the sewer line which will require easements Gerhardson said this change will reduce the total amount of line needed and will move the line out of the low area onto dry land He did not know ofthand the budgeted amount when asked by Kelley. Callahan asked if the homeowners wanted the line moved Gerhardson said the person who was impacted the most by the change was in agreement Moorse commented that the storm sewer was more of a controversial item than the issue of the sanitary sewer. Callahan said his main concern was with informing the homeowners of this change. Gerhardson informed Goetten that the installation would be performed by City employees The additional cost would be for the e.xtra 100* of pipe Kelley asked if the $4680 would be recouped Gerhardson thought there would be a savinus Moorse said, in terms of maintenance and l&I. there would be a significant savimis. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITT' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,19^ (#23 - Kdly Avenue Easement Acquisition - Continued) Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to authorize the acquisition of sanitary easements for sev^er line replacement on Kelly Avenue for an amount ot $l 00 per s.f. and that the monies to purchase the easements will be funded through the Sewer Operating Furtd. Vote: Ayes 3. Nays 0. (#24) LUCE LINE TRAIL - LONG TERM PLANNING PROCESS - RESOLUTION #3639 Callahan reported on the upcoming meeting planned b}‘ the DNK on long term planning for the Luce Line Trail Moorse said the DNR would like to receive input from the Council regarding the future of the Luce Line Trail. McDermott said the majority of the Park Commission would like to maintain the limestone base He said the DNR was interested in hearing from the ditVerent types of users McDermott said the people spoken with by the Commission liked the natural setting. Council noted that in-line skaters have the Baker Park trails, as well as the Orono trails, to use. Kelley said he would prefer to have a natural trail. Goetten agreed. It was noted that Hurr had earlier noted her preference for paving the trail Callahan said a representative would need to attend the meetings Several Park Commissioners have volunteered to do so. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3039 informing the DNR, after consideration and taking the pulse of the citizens, the vast majority of the Park Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council recommend the Luce Line Trail remain as it is Vote Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett requested an E.\ecutive Session (*#25) LICENSES Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the following licenses: Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0 Home Occupation License Initial Review Dale McCurdy 404 1 Nonh Shore Drive MlNirrES OF THE REGULAR ORONO OTV COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVTMBER 13,1995 (#25 4Jceaes - ContinKd) Gambling Pennit Resolution #3640 Lions Mound Northwea Tonka Chib Navarre Lanes 3435 Shofelinc Drive (*«26> BILLS Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve paymeni of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0 adjournment Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 9:42 p.m. Edward J Callahan, Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M Hallin, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14.1995 NOV 2 ^ 19*5 CHY Of ORONO ROLL The Orono City Council met on the above date with the following members present; Mayor Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Councilmembers J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. Councilmcmbcr Jabbour was absent. The following represented City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, Public Works Director John Gerhardson and Recorder Lin Vec. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Callahan at 8:02 a.m. Liveable Communities Act - Resolution #3641 Moorse gave a brief description of the Liveable Communities Act and referred to the memo dated November 8.1995 for additional information on how Orono's 1980 Community Management Plan alreadv addresses alTordable housing policies and goals. The resolution reflects what is already in place regarding housing goals. Moorse stated that if Orono wants to participate in the Livable Communities Act Program for 1996. the City must elect to participate in the following steps; 1. Adopt a resolution by November 15, 1995. 2. Negotiate long-term (10-15 years) housing goals with Met Council. 3. Met Council needs to approve the long-term goals by January 15, 1996. 4 Once ^oals are approved. City must tormulale an action plan by June 30, 1996. 5. Beginning in 1998. Met Council will measure progress City is making toward the housing goals on an annual basis. Moorse explained that the whole idea of the Liveable Communities Act is to maintain and increase the supply of atlbrdable and "life cycle" housing in suburban areas. "Life cycle" housing is defined as a ranee of housing that can match life sty les of people through their life cycle, i.e. single, married, children, emptv nesters. etc. Hurr felt that area communities are already providing such housing options. Moorse noted that Met Council has agreed to "cluster" or sub-regional planning for meeting housing needs. A study could be done of area communities, such as Spring Park, Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach, to see if needs are being met by the current housing supply. Hurr questioned Orono ’s responsibility to spend SI5.000 per year on atTordable housing-related activities. .Moorse explained that the City is currently spending that amount of money on housing rehabilitation. There ;ire three potential programs for funding that relate to affordable housing, none of which Orono would probably be eligible for. Cities who are doing major projects may have access to some of these grant funds. «it| T MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14,1995 Hurr asked how the $15.000 amount was calculated. Moorse explained there w^ a formula used based on the Cit\'*s tax base. There would be no financial responsibility in 1996. but the $15,000 obligation would start in 1997. It does not have to be spent on new housing. Hurr did not feel there was a problem with affordable housing, noting areas such as Crystal Bay and Navarre with housing under SI 15.000. Kelley asked if the money could be spent on other improvements such as sewer or roads which would also make housing more affordable in some areas. .Moorse felt arguments could be made to support such cases. It was moved by Hurr. seconded by Kelly, to adopt Resolution #3641 Participation in the Metropolitan Liveable Communities Act Local Housing Incentive Program. Vote: 3 ayes, 0 nays. Mavor Callahan did not vote. Status of Potential Neighborhood Sewer Projects and MUSA Amendment Application Gaffron referred to the November 13, 1995 and October 18,1995 memos as well as a draft copy of the MUSA Amendment Application. Gaf fron gave an update of responses from the neighborhoods. North Long Lake and the Long Lake Countiy Club have not officially responded but both are going through a petition process. Orono Orchards has not responded at all. Bay Ridge has submitted a petition for sewer dated October 19, 1995. Fo.xhill submitted a letter representing the Foxhill subdivision (not in favor) but not the Shoreline Drive residents (some favor sewer). A building pemiit was denied at 1860 Shoreline Drive due to a non-conforming septic system w hich needs to be upgraded at the time of a building permit application. The owners requested consideration to begin their project pending possible sewer installation in the near future. Edgewood Hills is in favor of pursuing the possibility. Fox Ridge and East Long Lake have given no response. Bracketts Point has submitted 1 1 of 12 petitions in favor of sewer. One resident has not responded but indicated he may be in favor under certain conditions. Webber Hills has submitted a petition also. 28 out of 34 are in favor of sewer (not the 100% the City would like to see to make a commitment). Jim Dillman has requested consideration as his property on Willow Drive is adjacent to a sewered area. There are other similar cases throuuhout the City. Gaffron noted the MUSA /\mendment Application has some blanks which need to be completed. He referred to the "Non-Relatcd Issues" listed at the end of the application. Met Council has asked the City to discuss U-ansportation. housing, stormwater management, etc. as part of the MUSA application but these are really not related to the sewer issues. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14,1995 Gaf&on suggested tv^o options for the Interim Strategy for Reduction of Nonpoinl Source Pollution: 1. Ask Met Council to delay imposition of the Interim Strategy requirements. 2. I ncorporale, by ordinance, NURP Standards and Best NIanagement Practices into the existing Code without doing a comprehensive stormwater plan at this point. These have already been included in the Comprehensive Plan. Moorse noted that approximately $50,000 has been Included in the 1996 budget process for a stormwater management plan. Hurr suggested that Mary Smith be kept informed and ask her to be present at all meetings with Met Council and Orono. Gaffron asked if all ten hot spots plus the school district property and hockey site should be included in the application. Hurt responded that as much as possible should be included in the application. Callahan apeed adding that additional units should also be included tor potential properties adjacent to the e.xisting MUSA boundary, possibly 50. Gaffron commented on the Rural Density Analysis noting that Met Council has already agreed that Orono is exempt. Transportation includes the Highway 12 issues that are still not resolved. Kelley added that County Road 6 and 15 are also being studied. Moorse noted that there are many positives in relation to Orono ’s transportation plan. Gaffron thought it would take at least 2-3 weeks to complete the application before final review by Council. Met Council has 60 days from the date they receive the application to review and respond to the application. Hurr suggested that Council and Gaftron meet with Mary Smith prior to meeting with Met Council probably in early December. Callahan noted that even with the MUSA application and the ten hot spots identified, there are still approximately two-thirds of Orono's properties with sewer/scptic problems that are not addressed bv inclusion in the MUSA boundaries. Goetten thanl;ed Gaftron for the time and good work in preparing information for the MUSA Amendment Application, 5IINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD N0VT:MBER 14,1995 Gocltcn asked for direction with the Bouchard property on Shoreline Drive as she had also receive^*, a call from the property owner. Kelley suggested a Letter of Credit so that if the MUSA line does not go through in two years, a new septic s> stem could be installed. Moorse also suggested a Waiver of Appeal in terms of assessing the property owner for the cost of sewer installation. Potential Availability of the Hennepin County Library Property at Old Cry stal Bay Road and Highway 12 Moorse lead a discussion of the City's interest in the Library property. Goetten felt the City should purchase the property so they had some control over what was developed on the site. Kelley asked the size and cost of the propeity'. Moorse responded that it was two acres, appraised at $227,000 in 1994. Hurr asked about the possibility of selling other City properties. Moorse commented that a lener had been received bv Mr. Harstad who lives near McCulley Road. He expressed an interest in purchasing property that was excess right-of-way after McCulley Road was constructed. One tour- acre buildable lot and two smaller lots are available. The property has a potential value of $120,000 or more. Gerhardson noted this parcel was almost live acres in a five acre zone. Mabusth added that a variance would be required for building but noted that Mr. Harstad did not want to build on the property nor did he want anyone else to build on it. Harstad also hopes to acquire a parcel from Ken Tumham. With the acquisition of two smaller parcels owned by the City, he would have a connection to the Tumham property. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to purchase the Libraiy propeny and investigate the sale of the McCulley Road property. Vote: 3 ayes. 1 nay. Kelley opposed the purchase of the Librarv' property as there are many properties that could be bought for $227,0oo. Moorse confirmed that the City would review the appraisal and other similar properties to detennine a value for the property. AD.JOUR i.ViUNT It was moved by Mayor Callalian to adjourn at 9:02 a.m. A'n'EST: Dorothv M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 7 1995 CfTY Of ORONO DATE: November 21, 1995 ITEM NO.; Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Plaining A Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2057 James Nystrom • Revised Resolution Language (Consent Agenda) Per Council's reconsiueration of Application #2057 on November 13, Resolution No. 3602 has been revised as follows: • Title revised to eliminate denial language. . Finding #4 revised to read as follows; "The Citv Council finds that the negative impact on sizes and house layout and improved location of the residence in relation to lot lines as compared to the existing residence, is adequate justification for granting ot the requested side setback variances for the new residence, but only in conjunction with a reduction of the side roof overhangs to a width of 1’, resulting in no overhang encroachm.ent nearer than 8.5' from the side lot lines." . In Conclusions. Order and Conditions, changes denial to granting of the variance for 9.5' setbacks for the house. • Approval Condition #3 revised to read as follows; "Roof overhang shall extend no closer than 8.5’ to the vertical extension of the side lot lines." Staff Recommendation Adopt the revised language of Resolution No. 3602. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by ____, seconded by___, to adopt Resolution No. 3602 as revised, granting lot area, lot width, average lakeshore setback, hardcover and side setback variances for James Nvstrom at 1745 Concordia Street. Vote. _____ _____ nays. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUi DIVISION 6 (B), SECTION 10.22, SL^DrV'ISIONS 1 & 2, AND SECTION 10.56, SL^DI\TSION 16 (L) FILE #2057 WHEREAS. James Nystrom (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1745 Concordia Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 13, Coffee's Addition to Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 (B) to allow construction of a single family residence and detached zaraee on a lot 0.46 acre in area where 0.5 acre lot area is required, and 75' in width, where loO’^is normally required, and said residence structure being 9.5' from the north and south side lot lines where a 10’ side yard setback is normally required, and a variance to Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 to allow said structure to be located less than the normally required 75’ setback from the lakeshore and such location encroaching on the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed, and a variance to Sections 10.22, oubdivision and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow hardcover on the property in excess of the hardcover limitations imposed by the zoning code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minne.sota: FINDINGS 1 This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2057. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 7 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 21, 1995, and recommended approval of certain requested variances and denial of other requested variances based upon the following findings: A. The lot area and lot width variances should be granted since a residence alreadv exists on the property and no additional land is available tor purchase by the applicant to make the lot area arvl width more contorming. B. The proposed variance to allow construction of a deck in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone should be denied because no adequate hardship has been justified to support such a variance. The removal of the existing residence and deck area affords every opportunity and ability to construct a residence and deck meeting the required 75' lakeshore setback, and the relative location and current use of the residence struemre on the adjacent property do not provide sufficient hardship to justify the granting of the requested lakeshore setback variance. C. The average lakeshore setback variance is justified based on the location of the adjacent house to the north which is extremely distant from the lake and therefore creates an average setback line which would force applicant's proposed residence to be similarly distant from the lakeshore, resulting in not one but two residences out of character with the general residential development in the neighborhood. D. The applicant has proposed to remove the existing detached garage which is 0. r from the south side line and move that garage to a location meeting all setback requirements. E. The requested variances to allow a side setback of 9.5' on both the north and south side lot lines where a 10' side setback is normally required, are justified by the elimination of the existing 1.6' south side setback by replacing that structure with a new structure meeting 95% of the required setback instead of the existing 16%, and said setback variances are further justified by the negative impact on room sizes and house layout if the variances are not granted, and the improved location of the residence in relation to lot lines provides further overall justification for the setback variances. Page 2 of 7 F. A hardcover variances in the 0-75’ zone is not justified since the removal of existing residence and deck allows for the replacement ot a new house and deck meeting the 75’ lakeshorc setback and therefore any hardcover in the 0-75’ zone easily be avoided. Applicant has not shown adequate hardship to justify placement of hardcover in the 0-75 zone. G. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone is proposed to increase from 24.6% existing to 31 % proposed by applicant. Moving the proposed house and deck out of the 0-75’ zone results in a final hardcover (accounting for reduced sidewalk length) of approximately 4,600 s.f. or 35.0% in the 75-250 zone. "11115 percentage increase is Justified by the hardcover elimination in the 0- 75’ zone. Further, hardcover in the 250-500' zone will increase from the existing 22.8% to 60% proposed by the applicant where only 30% is normally allowed, however, a hardship is the small size of the 250-500 zone and the variance is justified by the concurrent removal of hardcover in the 0-75’ zone and general reconstruction of hardcover at locations further from the lake than currently exists. Overall hardcover on the property' is proposed to decrease from 5,715 s.f. (28.5%) to approximately 5,350 s.f. (26.7%), where the entire lot would normally be allowed 18.3% hardcover under normal hardcover limitations. The City Council finds that the negative impact on sizes and house layout and improved location of the residence in relation to lot lines as compared to the existing residence, is adequate Justification for granting of the requested side setback variances for the new residence, but only in conjunction with a reduction of the side roof overhangs to a width of 1’, resulting in no overhang encroachment nearer than 8.5’ from the side lot lines." The City Council has considered this application including the tindings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 7 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely alfect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a tire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the removal of the existing resideiKC. deck aiKl detached garage and construction of a new residence, deck and detached garage on a lot of area 0.46 acre where a 0.50 lot area is normally required, and on a lot of width 75' where a 100' lot width is normally required; and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow the new residence and deck to be constructed lakeward of the defiiKd average setback line, and grants a variance to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow 35.0% hardcover in the 75-250’ zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 60% hardcover in the 250-500’ zone where only 30% hardcover is normally allowed; and grants a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow the new resideixre sirucmre and deck to be legated 9.5' from the north and south side lot lines where a 10 ’ side setback is normally required; subject to the following conditions: 1.The proposed new residence and deck shall not be located within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone, and no hardcover will be allowed in the 0-75’ zone. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone shall be limited to 4,600 s.f. (35.0%) per the diagram and schedule attached as Exhibit A. Funher, hardcover in the 250-500’ zone shall be limited to 750 s.f. (60.0%) per the schedule and diagram attached in Exhibit A. Applicant is advised that any future proposals to add hardcover to the property beyond the levels approved in this resolution will require an additional variance application, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of existinc hardcover to result in no net hardcover increase. Page 4 of 7 3. 5. 6. Roof overhang shall extend no closer than 8.5' to the vertical extension of the side lot lines. Authorities granted by this variance rtin with the property not with the applicant, but arc permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 27, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constinite a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of November, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of November, 1995. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 ♦ ^^'If* ->oo^ •/UO ma «1>C c Mv^ ^tcowcti.75 -Zvo' 2.oAj(y *. ^/AAOcotieA f=e«<ftetriS/E>cc#c/s it«vjA.t.t«74AAX^iciv»^k*|4Tz:.. •5,HA ‘a- fJoT ^cet?£i V, 4?00 /.-<^. //-^^cxroi/^fi. ^u-owc-t^ Fo<?. ^fCtV^li«U^V0A^ ^HI>IL ^JDT ex<^^0i yso C. > ‘i' 44o S'jpP4 rr^.T vrrrrrrrTrr^^r.’^- r-7.'-’ :r. r-TTnTO*T»rT?7-T^:r:;7rr •>-ty;*7;^'1^-'r':v-;.4l'-, ••'•■■ • •^*A'4f->4, ■' ^ 4 j « •••• • iiOJSEJ3T!5?!J^^ r 4. m CITY OF ORONO P.O. Boi 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 473-7357 APPUCATION NO. 2079 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 11/21/95 TO: Rick Perry 440 Willow Drive South Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES: • TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 1 1/13/'95 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Council conceptually approved the setback variances for the 20’x22' garage addition (total area %8 s.f.) to the west side of the structure. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted to reflect the directi\ es of Council's conceptual approval. You are asked to review the findings and conditions of the resolution and to contact staff prior to the meeting if you have any questions. The resolution will be presented to Council for their formal action at their November 27th meeting. The application will be placed on the consent agenda which means your application will be voted at the first part of the agenda by one motion. If your application is to be removed from the consent agenda, you w ill be advised at the time of Council's consideration of the consent agenda. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D) AND (E) FILE #2079 WHEREAS, Richard Perry, Jr. (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner ot the property located at 440 Willow Drive South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as tollows: Refer to Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (E) to permit the construction of a 20 ’x22 ’ addition to the west side of an existing 22'\23' detached garage located in the street yard in front of the principal structure where accessory structures are to be placed either at or behind the front line of the principal structure. The garage will be located 6.4 from the side lot line where the code would require a 15' setback and where the existing structure is located 5.2' from the south side lot line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2079. The property is located in the RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres of diy contiguous land. The property consists of 27,339 s.f. or .63 acres. Page 1 of 6 J 3. 4. The City Council of Orono reviewed this application on November 13, 1995, npd recommended conceptual approval of the proposed v ariances based upon the following findings: A. The property at .63 acres would be allowed a total ot 2,000 s.t. accessory structure area. The property contains a total of 1,024 s.t. ot accessory' structures (968 s.f. of garage and 56 s.f. ot shed in rear yard). B. C. D, E. F. The property is narrow with steep topography restricting vehicular access to the rear yard. The only gentle sloped area on the property is to the rear yard where the existing septic system is located. This area should be retained for future septic needs. The flatter sloped area in the west front yard was filled and not suitable for on-site septic development. Sloping topography in the location of the proposed addition will allow applicant to minimize visual impact of structure. The applicant received approval of a side setback variance at 5’ for the existing 22 ’x23' garage in 1978. The proposed structure will be located 6.4 ’ from the side lot line. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that grantine the variance would not adversely alTect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 ife 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and rcconunendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (E) to permit the construction of a 20 ’x22’ addition to the west side of an existing detached garage located in front of the principal structure where no structures would be allowed and where the structure will be located 6.4 ’ from the side let line requiring approval of 8.6’ variance or 57.3%. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an updated survey locating addition to west side of the detached garage. Applicant ’s construction plan shall address design of the roof to minimize the impact of the structure from the street and side yard. Applicant to provide a landscape plan showing location and number of evergreen trees to be planted to the west and south side of the addition. 3.Authorities granted by this variance ran with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be e.xercised by application tor a building permit within one > ir of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 27, 1996). 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, herebv aerees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 L. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of November, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HEN^NEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of November, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said mstrument was executed on behalf of the Citv. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of____, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared________________________________^----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing iiLstrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of____ NOTARY PUBUC . 199 before me a Nctaiv Public within and for said countv, personally appeared----------------------------------- ------------------------------ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who e.xecuted the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTy\RY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of _, 199 betorc me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________^------------------------ known to me to be the pcrson(s) described in and who executed the toregomg mstrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 6 Cv-rJCi ’J/.tETluG NOV 2 7 1995REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION m 0( ORONO DATE: November 22, 1995 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Niai* Michael P. GatTron Titk Assistant Planning Sl Zoning Admimstrator Administrator Rcviet^ed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description Septic Jystcm Upgrade Agreement - Thomas and Pauline Bouchard. 1860 Shoreline Drive The Bouchard property at 1860 Shoreline Drive contains a non-conforming septic system which was identified as such in 1994. The property owners would normally have until December 31, 19% to make that system conforming. However, the Bouchards have requested a building permit for additions to their residence, which per the Shoreland Ordinance triggers immediate upgrade of the system. Testing and design work have been submitted confirming the septic system can be suitably upgraded. Weather conditions prohibit the installation of a new system at this time. Further complicating matters is the fact that this neighborhood is one of the "hot spots" being con.sidered for municipal sewer. Per Council's direction at the November 14 Special Meeting, staff and the City Attorney have drafted an agreement to be executed by the City and the Bouchards, including a letter of credit. .A "deadline" or completion date for the system upgrade of July 31, 1996 is suggested. The aereement also includes a "reconsideration clause" that would allow the property owner to appear before the Council to discuss the potential for municipal sewer if a decision has not been made by the time the upgrade would be occurring. Again, it is the City's intent to not force septic system upgrades if sewer is expected to be prov ided in the short term. It was suegested at the November 14 meeting that approval of this building permit and the e-\lension of time until mid-1996 to upgrade the system, might be conditioned on the property owners waiving their right of assessment appeal for a future sewer that might be constructed to serve their property. Staff has not made tliai part of the agreement, but can do so if Council so directs. In a standard Developer ’s .Agrc nnenl, the City normally requires a letter of credit for 150% of the estimated cost of the .urk. This covers extraneous costs should die City actually have to contract for and ci'rnplete the work. I Request for Coimcil Action contim^ Page 2 of 2 November 22,1995 Septic System Upgrade Agreement - Thomas and Pauline Bouchard. I860 Shoreline Drive In the of a septic system upgrade, does CouiKil feel the 150% tigure is appropriate or slmuld it be redtKed? Mrs, Bouchard has indicated she will be at the November 27 meeting to answer any questions the Council may have. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Review and approve the draft Septic System Upgrade Agreement between the City and the Bouchards. Staff anticipates that a similar agreement may be used in Uie future for similar situations. 1 ! A lit \ * €lTYof ORONO MaokipaJ Office) smt AMms: 2750 Partony OraM. m 55356 ibiif Mirm P 0. Boi 66 CtysUI Bay. MN 55323 Pauline Bouchard I860 Shoreline Drive Wavzata, NIN 55391 Dear Ms. Bouchard: Attached is a proposed agreement concerning the necessary upgrading of your septic system. I have enclosed pertinent sections of the City ordinances, as well as a memo to the City Council. In order to provide you a reasonable time period in which to complete the necessary upgrade, we propose a completion deadline date of July 31, 1996. However, we have also included a "reconsideration clause" that would allow you to appear before the Council to discuss the potential for municipal sewer if a decision to proceed with municipal sewer installation has not been made by the reconsideration date. This agreement is scheduled for review by the City- Council at their regular meeting this cornuig ”Monday, November 27. The meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.. and I anticipate this item will be fairly near the beginning of the meeting. It would be helpful to the Council ’s understanding of the situation if you or your representative could be present. Please call me if you ha% e any questions. Sincerely, /yti' Michael P. Gatfron Assistant Planning & Zoning Adrmnistrator MPG/lsv Enc. I Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-U510 r CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SEPTIC SYSTEM UPGRADE AGREEMENT FOR (Propertjf Owner ’s Name) (Address) THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of , by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State ot Minnesota (hereinafter called City ), and , their heirs. successors and assigns, (hereinatter called "Property Owner"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Property Owner is the owner of certain property and has made application to the City of Orono for a building permit to construct improvements on such real property legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the septic system serving the property has been determined by the City to be non-conforming; and WHEREAS, the Orono .Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 (C) requires that "a nim-confonning sewage treatment system as defined in Section 12.30 and located within the Shoreland Overlay District must be upgraded and made conforming, at a minimum, at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement on. or use of, the property. Further, the non-conforming sewage treatment system provisions of Section 12.30 shall apply to all shoreland areas"; and WHEREAS, the Property is within the Shoreland Overlay District; and W HEREAS, the Property Owner desires to obtain a permit for improvements to the Property at this time but due to weather constraints cannot complete the required septic system upgrade until the 1996 construction ye:ir; and Initials of Property Owner Initials of City Clerk Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS^ the City CouiKil is cunently considering \%iicther installation of miffiicipal server is i^m>priate for the neighborhood \h1iich ixicludes the Propert>% but has not at this time detetmined \%hcther municipal sevk^’ will be pro\ided to the neighborhood or to the Propcrt>'. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the pemises and of the mutual promises aiidl conditions hereinafter contained, it is herebv agreed as follows: 1 Piopeitv Improvements: In accordance with the policies ami ordinances of the City, the following described private improvements are proposed to be constructed by the Property Owner or hi&'her contractor, who has applied to the City for a building permit for said private propcrt>^ improvements (the ”Property lmpro\‘cmcnts"): 2. 3. |«^«;iinnre of Building Permit for Property Improvements: The City agrees to issue a building permit for the Property Improvements at this time, subject to conformance with all current City standards and ordinances for all applicable work. Septic System 1 rerade: In accordance with the ordinances and requirements of the City, the Property Owner hereby agrees to complete the required upgrade of the septic system no later than July 31. l‘)% (the "Completion Date"). Initials of Property Owner, Initials of City Clerk Page 2 of 6 r 5. 6. «^|r iTnyfaHf Tn^tnlTation: Thc design location, construction, installation and materials for septic system upgrade shall be in accordance Wriih the plans and specilications approv'cd by thc City and attached to this agreement as Exhibit B (thc Septic Improvemcnts"), Reconsideration: No later to thirty (30) days prior to the Completion Date, the Property Owner may request reconsideration of this agreement by the City Council il one of the following has occurred: A. Thc City Council has made a decision to provide municipal sewer to thc laighborhood including the Property ; or B. The City Council has made no decision whether municipal sewer will be provided to the neighborhood and the Property. In the event of reconsideration, the City Council in its sole discretion may determine whether the Completion Date may be extended for the Septic Improvements or, in the event that municipal sewer will be provided, to declare the Septic Improvements clause of this agreement null and void, and City shall immediately return thc letter ot vredit to Property Owner. Performance Dept^sit: For the purposes of assuring to thc City that the Septic Improvements will be completed according to the terms of this agreement, the Property Owner has deposited with the City at the time of the execution of this agreement an irrevocable letter of credit in a form satisfactory to the City' providing that thc City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Septic Improvements if the Property Owner fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the Completion Date. Ihe amount of the letter of credit shall not be reduced before substantial completion of the Septic Improvements. 1 he term of the letter of credit shall be a period of one year. City shall return the letter of credit to Property Owner uptm acceptance of the Septic Improvemen'i. 7.pindiny 1-ffect: The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be bindinu deemed covenants lunning wiili the land. References herein to Property Owner, if there be more than cne. shall mean each and all of them. This agreement shall be executed by the Property Cwrier and City and shall be placed of record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of all or any pan of the properly, and all recording fees, if any. shall be paid by the Property Owner. Initials of Property Owner, Initials of City Clerk Page 3 of 6 Notices! Whenever in this agreement, it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other partv’, such notice or d emand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth below. Such notice or demand shall be iteemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. 9. 10. 11. Notice to Cits- Citv of Orono Clciic/Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Notice to Prot>ertv Owner Disclaimer hv Citv: It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Property Owner or the Property Owner’s contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person, firm or corporation, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions, or causes of action of any kind or character, arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the perfomiance and completion of the Septic Improvements. Hold Harmles-s and Indemnification: The Property Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses. Including attorney fees, which the City, City Council and agents and employees of the City may sutler or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the performance of this agreement by the Property Owner, its employees, aeenfs or subcontractors, whether or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. w Remedy for Default! Default by the Property Owm*r of any of the terms of this agreement shall automatically result in the suspension or withholding of all permits, licenses, occupancy certificates or other authori2xitions issued by the City in connection with the Property, and may. at City's sole discretion, give rise to a draw upon the letter of credit by City to remedy such default. .A The Property Owner hereby grants to the City, its agents and its employees, the right to enter on the Property for the specific purpose of constructing or completing the Septic Improvements should the Property Owner not complete those Septic Improvements by the Completion Date. The remedies afibrded to the City under this Section shall be in addition to any otlicr remedies which the City’ may be entitled by law or equity or other agreement. Initials of Property Owner_______ Initials of Citv Clerk Pace 4 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ^ City and Proper^ Owner have Caused this a^eemcnt to be duly executed on the day and year first libove written. CITY OF ORONO By:Bv: (City Clerk) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HEN^IEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged betore me on this ,19 .bv _____&___________ day of , Mayor & City Cleric of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv’ Public PROPERTY OWNER(S) By:.And: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instalment was acknowledged before me on 1995, by NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 6 Reviewed for Administration: Date:Bv: (Cit>’ Official) i This document has been drafted by: Citv of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Paee 6 of 6 ^Utiicnnov REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 1995 DATE: November 22.1995 ITEM NO: P Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Thie City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: M Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Metropolitan Sewer Interceptor Reconveyance Agreement Background The city constructed a sewer trunk line in the early 1960 ’s to serve the North Arm area. In 1977 the MWee purchased this line from the city because it was carrying flows from Minnetonka Beach. At that time it was the MWCC’s policy to purchase all lines carrying flows from more than one city as part of creating the regional sewer system. The MWCC financed the purchase of this line by agreeing to provide credits to the city toward if MWCC bill for a period of thirty years. The amount of these credits has been $29,340 per year. During the years 1987 through 1990 the MWCC constructed a partial replacement facility for the interceptor described above. Prior to construction of the interceptor project, the MWCC and the city of Orono reached an informal arrangement regarding the city’s assistance in constructing the project and reconveying p<mions of the interceptor to the city. One of the elements of the arrangement was that the city would take over operation and maintenance of the portion of the interceptor to be reconveyed to the city upon completion of the replacement interceptor. Another element is that the city would pay the sum of $3,500 per year over a 20 year period to the MWCC for work completed in conjunction with the interceptor project which allowed the c*ty to eliminate a lift station. The informal arrangement was never formalized and the two elements of the arrangement listed above were never carried out. In 1994 the city and the MWCC reinitiated a process to formalize the elements of an agreement for the reconveyance of the interceptor from the MWCC to the city. This process added an additional element to the agreement. The additional element relates to the MWCC’s payment to the city for the original purchase of the interceptor from the city in 1977. The MWCC has been paying the city for the interceptor in the form of annual current value credits, credited against amounts owed by the city to the MWCC for sewer service. These credits continue through the year 2006. As pan of the reconveyance, the city and MWCC agreed that the amount of the credits provided to the city sh suld be reduced to reflect the reconveyance of portions of the interceptor to the city. The amount of the credits will be reduced from $29,394 per year to $17,401.25 per year through the year 2006. I I ilA CoHiinuedRequest for Cc 2 of 2 Nomber 22. 1995 Metn^wlitan Sewer lnterce|Mor Reconveyaiice Agreement The next step in finalizing an agreement with the MWCC was to identify all portions of the sewer line, and all easements related to the sewer line, that are to be reconveyed to Orono. This process has now been completed. An ag.*ecment which sets out all of the details of the reconveyance has now been prepared, and is ready for Council approval. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Council approve the attached agreement to formalize the reconveyance of a portion of the MWCC interceptor to tte City of Orono, to reflect its current use by the city as part of the city’s sewer trunk system. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTSTED: Motion to approve the interceptor leconveyance agreement and to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future November 21,1995 »0V 2 '2 1995 Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator City of Orono Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Moorse: It is a pleasure to send you the formal agreement for the Orono Interceptor reconveyance. Mark Thompson from the Metropolitan Council Legal Counsel’s Office, made changes resulting from discussions' at the meeting of Nov. 2. 1995 The two schedule, iv. the revised Current Value Credit and the payment from the preferred location for the lift station have been made part of the agreement. Yesterday I received from Glen Cook two copies of the map of the regional and local sewer systems depicting the portion of the regional system being reconveyed. There are a few nunor changes mostly due to mislabeling of some lift stations; nothing to worry about but clearly it needs to be consistent with the text of the agreement. I shall work with Glen to have the changes made. I shall send you two originals of the agreement together with corrected maps for signature, as soon as I get the new maps. If you have any question, please call me at 291-6402, I look forward to the signing of this agreement. Sincerely, C2i Marcel R. JouseaO^ager Water ManagemenTiechnical Services 230 Ea^irmh street St. Paul. MlnncaoU 55101-1634 (612)291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TOD/TtY 291-0904 Metro Info Ur,e 229-3780 An Oppoftwuty Emploger I HECONVEYANCE AGREEMENT TfflS AGREE^^ENT is made and entered into by and between the Metropolitan Council (hereinafter referred to as the "Council") and the City of Orono (hereinafter referred to as the 'Municipality"), each acting by and through its duly authorized officers. SECTION 1. RECITALS A. The Metropolitan Council is the successor entity to all the property and interests of the former Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (hereinafter referred to as the MWCC ). B. In 1976 and 1977, the MWCC purchased a sanitary sewer line, along with certain lift stations, appurtenant structures, and property’ rights, from the Municipality for use as a metropolitan interceptor. That interceptor was designated Interceptor 6-OR-641 and is hereinafter referred to bv that number. C. During the years 1987 through 1990 the MWCC constructed a panial replacement facility for Interceptor 6-OR-641. The replacement facility is designated as Project 85-67 and is hereinafter referred to by that number. The new facility was substantially completed and operational on or about June 1, 1990. Prior to construction of Project 85-67 the MWCC and the Municipality reached an informal arrangement regarding the Municipality's assistance in constructing Project 85-67 and the reconveyance of portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641. This arrangement was never formalized. E. Upon completion of Project 85-67, portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 continued in use by the MWCC as metropolitan interceptor and portions were abandoned because they had no further use to either the MWCC or the Municipality. The remaining portions of Interceptor 6- OR-641 no longer are required for metropolitan interceptor purposes but retain a use as local JJ sewers for the Municipality. The Municipality has operated and maintained those rentaming portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 in use as local sew’cr beginning on or about June 1, 1990 and continuing to the present. In addition, certain portions of Project 85-67 are essentially trunk sewer lines and are more properly conveyed to the Municipality for operation and maintenance. F. The M\VCC was abolished by the Legislature effective July 1, 1994 and the Metropolitan Council became the owner of all properties formerly owned by the M\VCC. G. This agreement is intended to formalize the sale and reconveyance of the remaining portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641, and certain small portions of Project 85-67, in use as local sewer from the Metropolitan Council to the Municipality. SECTION 2. COUNCIL ACTION. By action of the Metropolitan Council on August 25, 1988, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission was directed to negotiate the reconveyance of Interceptor 6-OR-641 to the Municipality. The Council, by Resolution No 88-53 dated September 8, 1988, has approved the reconveyance to local units of government of interceptors which no longer have a role in providing metropolitan-level sanitary sewer services The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission ’s Implementation Plan for 1990-2010 determined that portions of Interceptor 6-OR- 641 'were surplus and should be reconveyed to the Municipality. The Implementation Plan was approved by the Council on June 22, 1989. SECTION 3. TRANSFER OF INTERCEPTOR. -2- The Council will transfer to the Municipality, by Bill of Sale, all of its right, title, and interest in and to those portions oflntcrce^nor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A attached hereto The Council will also transfer to the municipality, by Bill of Sale, all of its right, title, and interest in and to those portions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B attached hereto. It is the intent of the parties to this agreement that ownership of those portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A, and those portions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B, were effectively transferred to the Municipality on or about June 1, 1990. The Bill of Sale is intended to formalize this earlier transfer of interest. Those portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A, and portions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B, are conveyed by the Council in "as is" condition, i.e., the condition the interceptor was in on or about June 1, 1990. The Municipality agrees to accept those portions of the interceptor in such "as is" condition. It is the intent of the parlies that all costs for operation, maintenance and repairs to the ponions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A, and the ponions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B, commenced to be the responsibility of the Municipality on or about June 1, 1990 and shall continue to be the responsibility of the Municipality hereinafter. SECTION 4. TRANSFER OF PROPERTY RIGHTS. The Council shall also transfer to the Municipality by quit claim deed those easements and other property rights related to the portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A which it owns and (a) which are necessary for the operation, maintenance and repair of the reconveyed portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 and (b) which are no longer needed by the Council -3 - for operation, nufotenance. or repair of Project 85^7 or the retained portions of Interceptor 6- OR-641. The property interests to be transferred are described in Exhibit C attached hereto. There are no property interests conveyed in connection with the portions of Project 85-67 trsuisferrcd to the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement. The Council does not warrant or guarantee that the property rights to be conveyed (as described in Exhibit C) cover all of the property under which the sewer lines to be conveyed by this Agreement are located. It is the intent of the panics that ownership of the property interests described in Exhibit C was effectively transferred to the Municipality on or about June 1, 1990. The instruments of conveyance are intended to formalize this earlier i»‘ansfer of interest SECTION 5. MUNICIPALITY’S OBLIGATIONS In consideration of the Council transferring to the Municipality those portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit K those portions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B. and the property interests described in Exhibit C. the Municipality agrees as follows: A. indemnification . The Municipality will indemnify and hold harmless the Council, its employees, contractors and agents from and against all claims, expenses, damages, or losses (including but not limited to attorney ’s fees) arising out of or resulting from the operation, maintenance, or repair of the reconveyed portions of Interceptor 6-OR-641 described in Exhibit A, the reconveyed portions of Project 85-67 described in Exhibit B, and the property interests described in Exhibit C, which arose or shall arise on or after June 1, 1990. B. Payment. The Municipality will pay to the Council the sum of $70,000 in 20 annual payments ot Sa,500 payable as follows. -4 - 1. For the five years 1990 through 1994, during which period the Municipality has not made any payments for the facility, the sum of SI 7,500 is due and owing, This amount shall be amortized and paid by the Municipality at 6% interest over the remaining 15 years of the payment schedule at the sum of SI,SO 1.8 5 (principal and interest) per annum The remaining balance owed of $52,500 shall be paid in 15 equal payments of $3,500 per annum (principal and interest) over the remaining 15 years of the schedule Attached as Exhibit D is a schedule of payments to be made by the Municipality in accordance with this section 4B. The Municipality's annual payment for each year of the payment schedule shall be due and payable on or before December 31 of the applicable year. C. Use of Richt of Wav. The Municipality will allow the Council to construct. reconstruct, operate, and maintain Council Lift Station No. 45 within Municipality right-of-way. SECTION 6. ADAJSTMENT OF CURRENT VALUE CREDIT. The Metropolitan Council is currently paying the Municipality for the original purchase of Interceptor 6-OR-641 in 1976 and 1977. That payment is in the form of annual "current value credits" (CVC) credited against amounts owed by the Municipality to the Council for sewer service in each year through the year 2006 The parties to this Agreement agree that the amount of credit provided to the Municipality shall be reduced retroactively to June 1, 1990 to reflect the reconveyance of portions of Interceptor 6-OR-64I. The agreed upon reduction and adjusted current value credit are as set forth in Exhibit E in the column marked “CVC ADJUSTED SECTION 7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. -5- i r- This Agrccmsnt constitutes the entire agreement among the parties hereto and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements, commitments or understandings with respect to the matters provided for herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings. oral or written, among the parties relating to the subject of this Agreement that are not fully expressed herein IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Council and Municipality have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the dates set forth below. Date: Date; Date: I___ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Regional Administrator CITY OF ORONO Mayor Clerk -6- EXHffilTA PORTIONS OF INTERCEPTOR 6-QR-641 TO BE CON\^YED TO MUNICIPALITY (Note; except as specificallv noted, all references to gravity' lines and manholes ( M.H. ) arc to the record drawings ("as builts") dated Mav' 13,1963 for Interceptor 6-OR-64 1 on file at the offices of the Metropolitan Council/Wastcwaier Services.) 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 Gravit\’ ling from and including M.H. 1 to and including M.H. 9. (Includes M.H.'s 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, 8, and 9.) Gravity' line from and including M.H. 12 to and including M.H. 16. (Includes M.H.'s 12,13,14,15, and 16.) Gravit>’ line from and irKluding M.H. 17 to and including M.H, 21. (Includes M.H.'s 17,18, 19, 20, 20A, and 21.) M.H. 23. Gravit>’ line from connection point with new M.H. 25 (from Project 85-67) to and including M.H. 28, (Includes M.H.'s 25,26,27, and 28.) Gravitv line from and including M.H. 32 to and including M.H. 34. (Includes M.H. s j2, aa, and 34.) Gravit>' line from and including M.H. 36 to and including M.H. 47. (Includes M.H.'s 36,37,38,39, 40, 41[ 42, 43, 44, 45. 46, and 47.) Gravin' line from connection point with L-46 to and including M.H. 54. (Includes M.H.'s 50, 51,52, 53, and 54.) EXHIBIT B PORTIONS OF PROJECT 85-67 TO RF rONVEYED TO NfUNICIPALITY (Note: except as specifically noted, ail refc. cnees to gravit>- lines, forcemains, or new manholes ("M.H.") arc to the record drawings dated June 27,1988 for Project 85-67 on file at the offices of the Meuopolitan CouncilAVastcwatcr Serv ices References to "old" manholes refer to the record drawings ("as builts") dated May 13, 1963 for Interceptor 6-OR-641 on file at the offices of the Metropolitan CounciIAVastcwatcr Services.) I. Gravit>’ stub line from connection point with new M.H. 1 to connection point with old M.H. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Forcemain stub line front Municipalit>' Lift Station No 23 (west of Nocicnberg Channel) to cormcction pxtint with Project 85*67 forcemam. GravitN ’ stub line from connection point with new M.H. 20 to connection point with old M H. 17. Gravity branch line from connection point with new M H. 24 to connection point with old M.H. 23 (Includes new M.H.'s 25 and 26.) Gra\ ity branch line from connection point with new M.H. 31 to and including new M.H. 29. (Includes netv M.H.’s 29 and 30.) 6. Gravin.' stub line from connection point with new M H. 32 to connection point with old M.H. 32. 7. GravitN ’ stub line from connection point with new M.H. 37 to connection pomt with old M.H. 36, EXHIBIT C FA^FMF\’T<s TO RF TB A\’<;FFRRFn TO MTTVirTP AT TTV (Note: references are to original easement numbers from acquisition of Interceptor 6-OR-641 on file at the offices of the Metropoliun Council/\^’asteuater Services.) Seaion’Easement Nos.Document Nos. * 5 4257145 6 4257145 7 4257146 8 4257147 & 4257148 9 4257149 11 4257150 12 4257151 13 1204371 14 4257152 15 1204370 10 4257153 17 4257154 18 4257155 21 4257156 mm mm 4257157 23 4257158 24 4257159 24 A 4257160 ’ Pipe Section refers to the sequential numbered sections of pipe to be conveyed as set forth in Exhibit A which are associated with easements to be conveyed and no longer needed by Metropolitan Council for operation and maintenance of its own facilities. ‘ Document number refers to Hennepin County Recorder of Deeds document number for easement listed. ft • * EXHIBIT D PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR LIFT STATION RELOCATION {NOV. 20. 1995}43.500 payment schedula spilt between principal & interast 96% over 15 yesarsNPVBALANCE 433.992.87 432.532.44 430.984.39 429.343.45 427.604.06 425.760.30 423.805.92 421.734.28 419.538.34 417.210.64 414.743.27 412.127 87 49.355.54 46.416.87 43.301.89 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 I 42.039.57 41.951.95 41.859.06 41.760.61 41.656.24 41.545.62 41.428.36 41.304.06 41.172.30 41.032.64 4884.60 4727.67 4561.33 4385.01 4198.11 41.460.1!'3 41.548.05 41.640.94 41.739.39 41.843.76 41.954.38 42.071.64 42.195.94 42.327.70 42,467.36 42.615.40 42.772.33 42.938.67 43.114.99 43.301.89 Payment plan (or 5 years {1990-1995} payments split between principal & interest @ 6% BALANCE 417.500.00 416,748.15 415.951.19 415,106.41 414,210.94 413,261.75 412,255.61 411.189.09 410.058.59 48,860.25 47.590.02 46,243.57 44.816.33 43,303.46 41,699.82 418,507.13 433,992.87 Combined Totals1P1 P TOTAL 41.050.00 4751.85 43,089.57 42.212.28 45.301.85 41.004.89 4 796.96 42,956.84 42,345.01 45,301.85 4957.07 • 1*44.78 42,816.13 42,485.72 45,301.85 4906.38 *-.(5.47 42.666.99 42,634.86 45,301.85 4852.66 t ^49.19 42,508.90 42,792.95 45,301.85 4795.71 41,006.14 42,341.32 42,960.53 45.301.85 4735.34 41,066.51 42,163.69 43,138.16 45,301.85 4671.35 41,130.50 41,975.40 43,326.45 45,301.85 4603.52 41.198.33 41,775.82 43,526.03 45,301.85 4531.62 41,270.23 41,564.25 43,737.60 45,301.85 4455.40 41.346.45 41.340.00 43,961.85 45,301.85 4374.61 41,427.24 41,102.29 44.199.56 45,301.85 4288.98 41,512.87 4850.31 44.451.54 45,301.85 4198.21 41,603.64 4583.22 44,718.63 45,301.85 4101.99 41,699.86 4300.10 45,001.75 45.301.85 49,527.71 417,500.04 428,034.84 451.492.91 479.527.75 . • « • EXHIBIT E NEW CURRENT VALUE CREDIT SCHEDULE (NOV. 20, 1995)1995-2006 paymint schedule (or reconveyance of interceptor 1990-1994 payir nt schedule repaid (9 0% interest over 12 yea.sORIGCVCITOTAL I TOTAL CVCADJUSTED1990199119921993 1994 1995 129.394.00129.394.00120.394.00129.394.00 129,394.00 129,394.00 15.287.39 13.178.08 18.465.47 120,928.53 13.527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 1996 129.394.00 15,498.78 12,966.69 18.465.47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 1997 129,394.00 15,718.81 12,746 66 18,465.47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 1998 129.394.00 15,947.4912,517.98 18,465.47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 1999 129.394.00 16.185.37 12,280.10 18,465.47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 129.394.00 16,433.05 12,032.42 18,465.47 120.928.53 13,527.28 1000 13,527.28 117.401.25 2001 129,394.00 16,690.24 11,775.23 18,465.47 120.928 53 13.527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 2002 129,394.00 16,9b'».79 11,507.68 18.465.47 120,928 53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 2003 129,394.00 17,236.29 11.229.18 18,465.47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 2004 129,394.00 17,525.73 1939.74 18.465.47 120,928 53 13,527 28 10.00 13.527.28 117,401.25 2005 129,394.00 17,826.69 1638 78 18.465 47 120,928.53 13,527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 2006 129,394.00 18.143.77 1321.70 18.465.47 120,928.53 13.527.28 10.00 13,527.28 117,401.25 1499,698.00 179,451.41 122,134.23 1101,585.641251,142.36 142,327.36 10.00 142,327.36 1208,815.00 1ES M M ■§ M SS 33 ■■B S3 m a n «8 B S S S S B a B B B B B B B BBBBBBB B * » REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cw-uCJlKlETiI.G NOV 2 7 1995 CrTY OF ORONO DATE: November 21, 1995 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name: Tom Kuchn > Title; Finance Director Item Description: Certification of Delinquent Utilities Agenda Section: Citv Administrator's Report Attachments:A. Resolution providing for collection of delinquent sewer, water, septic inspection fees, and recv'cling program fees. B. Assessment roll Each year the city certifies to the county, all unpaid annual service charges for the septic inspection program fees, the annual recycling program fee, and all delinquent sewer and water accounts of $1 ‘'.00 or more, to be collected with the following year's taxes In addition to the outstanding amounts delinquent, the city adds eight percent (8%) interest to all accounts, and an administrative fee to the septic accounts. At this time the total to be assessed is $ 62,722-91^ including admirastrative fees This amount will be decreased by any pre-payments received up to the final payment dated of November 27, 1995. A copy of the assessment is attached for your review COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council direct and authorize the County Auditor to assess properties for delinquent utilities. PROPOSED MOTION; Moved by , seconded by ^ to adopt , providing for the collection of delinquent charges forResolution #__________ 1995 sewer and water utility services, and fees for the annual septic inspection and recycling programs. Ayes___, Nays___. CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT 1995 SE\> ER AND WATER UTILITV' SERVICE CHARGES, RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES, AND ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE ON-SITE SE\VA(;E TREATMENT (SEPTIC) INSPECTION PR0(;R.\M Whereas, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota has enacted certain ordinances under Minnesota Statutes, therefore pursuant to Chapter j and Chapter 13. Orono City Code pertaining to payment and collection of sewer and water charges and annual service charges for recycling and the Onsite SevN.ige Tieatment (septic) inspection program, and the charges identified in the attached list ot properties are delinquent in nature, and; Whereas, the City has obtained from the Hennepin County Auditor, levy number 13625 for the delinquent accounts, and; Whereas, the Citv hereby authorizes and directs the Hennepin County Auditor to extend upon the property tax lists of the Countv and further collect said assessments thereon provided by law. and; Whereas, the City hereby authorizes and directs the Hennepin County Auditor to add eight percent interest, as directed, to all amounts due. Therefore Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota hereby authorizes and directs the County Auditor of Hennepin County to assess properties identitied in the attached list, made a part hereof, for the amounts of delinquent utilities/fees appearing along with such propenies, plus eight percent (8®o) interest added as directed. Said amounts to be collected along with property taxes collected in 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on Nov ember 27, 1995. Edward J. Callahan Jr., Mayor attest: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk RESOLUTION i STATE OF MINNESOTA COLTMTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I. Dorothy M. Hallin, Ciw Clerk of the City of Orono. Hennepin County. Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on November 27. 1995. and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution duly adopted by said City Cotincil at said meeting. diV of In Witness '^’hereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ,19 Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk (SEAL) LEVY NUMBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS CHARGE INTEREST ON THE FOLLOWING ASSESSMENTS 13625 02-117-23- 31 -0002 41640 302.48 007 —1230 Dickenson St 13625 02-117-23- 31-0011 42560 302.48 -013 570 Orono Orchard Rd S 13625 02-117-23-43 -0026 42760 302.48 -—1165 Femdal* RdW 13625 04-117-23- 22 -0006 43109 139.80 ——140 Leaf St 13625 04-117-23- 22 -0007 43450 63.30 001 001 25 Cygnet PI 13625 04-117-23- 23-0004 41520 303.31 027 —370 Leaf St 13625 04-117-23- 23-0021 00954 126.60 001 001 3180 Ridgewood Cir 13625 05-117-23-13 -0032 41900 77.15 001 008 3405 Eastlake St 13625 05-117-23-13-0039 41900 81.78 002 008 3435 Eastlake St 13625 05-117-23-13-0040 41900 291.90 002 008 3415 Eastlake St 13625 05-117-23-14-0024 41900 157.48 007 002 285 Crestview Ave 13625 05-117-23-14-0031 41900 275.90 —005 325 Crestview Ave 13625 05-117-23-14-0039 41900 101.78 014 005 340 Tonka Ave 13625 05-117-23-14-0058 04354 383.61 001 001 3300 Bay side Rd 13625 05-117-23-22-0014 41440 86.71 —-185 Landmark Or 13625 05-117-23-23-0014 42320 275.90 007 001 348 Westlake St 13625 05-117-23-23-0021 42320 126.60 —002 309 Westlake St 13625 05-117-23-23-0024 42320 126.60 006 002 341 Westlake St 13625 05-117-23-23-0029 42320 291.90 018 002 365 Westlake St 13625 05-117- 23 - 34 - 0006 42880 261.35 012 -750 Tonkawa Rd 13625 06-117-23 - 41-0047 42620 265,94 013 006 583 Park La 13625 06-117- 23- 41-0099 42620 302.48 —007 550 Park La 13625 06-117-23 - 43-0012 00641 383.61 ——645 North Arm Dr 13625 07-117-23-11-0010 42950 29.42 006 001 850 Windjammer La 13625 07-117-23-31-0004 41940 558.41 006 —4485/7 North Shore Dr 13625 07-117-23-31-0010 41960 172.48 004 -4470 North Shore Dr 13625 07-117-23-31-0018 43080 302.48 ——1320 Rest Pt Cir 13625 07-117-23-31-0023 43080 250 88 oil -1348 Rest Pt Cir 13625 07-117-23 - 32 -0003 42000 302.48 —001 4725 Tonkaview La 13625 07-117-23-32-0009 42000 162.11 —003 4736 North Shore Dr 13625 07-117-23-32-0027 43132 384.50 --4635 Tonkaview La 13625 07-117 - 23 - 32 - 0030 43080 302.48 ——1310 Rest Pt La 13625 07-117-23-32-0047 43500 86.71 089 -4690 Tonkaview La 13625 07-117-23-33-0010 43360 86.71 025 -1405 Rest Pt Rd 13625 07-117-23 - 34 - 0003 41940 302.48 001 -4425 North Shore Dr 13625 07-117 -23 - 41-0016 43120 302.48 001 005 1205 Elmwood Ave 13625 07-117-23-41-0030 43120 202.48 001 007 1305 Elmwood Ave 13625 07-117-23 - 41-0054 43120 302.48 021 008 1368 North Arm Dr 13625 07-117-23-42-0007 43091 231.93 ——1375 Vine PI LEVY NUMBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT lot BLOCK ADDRESS 1362S 07-117- 23- 42 -0037 43120 221.35 •017 1360 Vin« PI 1362S 1COCM11o42300 302.48 --4005 North Shot* Dr 13625 07-117-23-44-0011 42300 231.93 013 -4091 HighwoodRd 13625 07-117-23-44-0014 42300 302.48 016 -4105 Highwood Rd 13625 07-117-23-44-0020 42300 302.48 024 -4167 Highwood Rd 13625 07-117-23-44-0021 42300 302.48 025 -4175 Highwood Rd 13625 07-117-23 -44-0026 42300 302.48 032 -4174 Highwood Rd 13625 07-117-23- 44-0027 42300 328.16 033 -4166 Highwood Rd 13625 07-117-23 - 44-0062 42300 302.48 —-4056 North Shoro Or 13625 07-117-23 - 44-0091 42300 89.16 -—1453 North Arm Dr 13625 08-117-23-13-0013 41480 383.61 --1040 Tonkawa Rd 13625 08-117 -23-13 -0015 43099 231.93 —-1030 Tonkawa Rd 13625 08-117-23-23-0005 42460 302.48 004 -1056 Loma Linda Ave 13625 08-117-23-33-0003 42180 86.71 -003 3838 Cherry Ave 13625 08-117-23-33-0066 42280 260.56 --1545 Minnie Ave 13625 08-117-23-33-0068 42280 86.71 Oil -3970 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117- 23 - 33 - 0071 42280 303.31 013 —1570 North Arm Dr 13625 08-117-23-33-0075 42280 302.48 017 —1540 North Arm Dr 13625 08-117-23-34-0008 41600 140.22 008 —3635 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-34-0020 41860 149.94 007 002 3580 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117 - 23 - 34 - 0053 42200 361.62 005 —3683 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117 - 23 - 34 - 0058 42180 125.83 -008 3768 North Shore Dr 13625 00-117-23-41-0001 41308 73.70 -—3200 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41 -0002 41308 102.48 -—3210 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41 -0004 41308 916.15 -—3220 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41-0006 41308 272.90 --3250 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41 -0007 41308 202.48 --3260 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41-0012 41308 921.24 —-3324 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41-0020 42500 107.27 008 —3342 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-41-0021 41308 272.90 ——3224 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-42-0002 42500 56.35 —-3398 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-42-0003 42500 292.68 —-3366 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-43-0016 42500 69.55 —-3400 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-44-0002 41308 302.48 —-3268 North Shore Dr 13625 08-117-23-44-0008 42005 302.48 003 001 3260 Bohns Pt La 13625 09-117-23-44-0005 42215 302.48 002 001 2425 Scotch Pine La 13625 20-117-23-21-0002 43102 222.26 —-2460 Dunwoody Ave 13625 10-117-23-31-0004 41310 302.48 --2080 North Shore Dr 13625 10-117-23-31-0007 41310 302.48 --1360 Railroad Ave 13625 10-117-23-31-0016 41310 247.15 --2150 Prospect Ave 13625 10-117-23-31-0022 42140 302.48 001 001 1251 Brown Rd S LEVY NUMBER 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 PROPERTY IPENTinCATION # 10-117-23- 31-0036 10-117-23- 31-0046 10-117-23-31 -0050 10-117-23-31-0057 10-117-23- 31-0072 10-117-23- 31-0098 10-117-23- 42-0022 17-117-23-21-0001 17-117-23-22-0028 17-117-23- 22-0029 17-117-23-23-0009 17-117-23 - 23-0017 17-117-23-23-0019 17-117-23-23-0031 17-117-23-24-0002 17-117-23-24-0007 17-117-23- 31-0017 17-117-23 - 31-0030 17-117-23-31-0032 17-117-23-31-0041 17-117- 23 - 34 -0026 17-117 - 23 - 34 -0034 17-117 - 23 - 41-0003 17-117-23-41-0004 17-117-23-41-0009 17-117 - 23 - 41-0011 17-117-23-41 -0014 17-117-23-41-0017 17-117-23-41-0021 17-117-23-41-0023 17-117-23-42-0021 17-117-23-43-0004 17-117-23-43-0011 17-117-23-43-0016 17-117-23-43-0020 17-117-23-43-0044 17-117-23-43-0074 17-117-23-43-0076 17-117-23-43-0087 17-117-23-43-0095 17-117-23-43-0098 ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT 42140 302.48 42520 302.48 42520 302.48 42520 302.48 42540 302.48 42520 190.81 00499 224.13 41317 263.74 42060 362.23 42060 383.86 42220 214.17 42225 538.65 42510 486.67 42220 186.05 41317 479.68 43101 18.34 43111 419.00 42420 439.70 42420 242.92 43620 650.82 01777 496.29 01777 482.12 43040 465.01 43040 818.25 42420 528.73 42420 568.04 42420 575.21 43540 200.16 43540 522.44 43540 486.37 01398 440.97 42740 539.15 42740 341.64 42740 493.20 42740 404.73 42740 524.88 42740 568.66 42740 481.79 42740 458.74 42740 324.56 42740 1.544.49 LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 004 005 001 002 017 001 002 027 004 004 030 004 002 001 001 002 008 010 001 008 019 018 022 010 019 002 2160 Crystal Ave 001 1375 Brown Rd S 001 1395 Brown Rd S 003 1335 Briar St 002 1245 Arbor St 003 2180 North Shore Dr 001 1960 Shoreline Dr - 3805 North Shore Dr - 1750 Concordia St - 1755 Fagemess PtRd - 1913 Fagemess PtRd 001 1940 Concordia St 001 1825 Fagemess PtRd - 1920 Fagemess PI Rd 1875 Shadywood Rd - 1855 Shadywood Rd 3725 Togo Rd 010 3660 Togo Rd 010 3670 Togo Rd 001 2100 Shadywood Rd 001 3600 Livingston Ave 002 3690 Lyric Ave 001 2150 Kenwood Way 001 2160 Kenwood Way 001 3235 Crystal Bay Rd 002 3205 Crystal Bay Rd 002 3265 Crystal Bay Rd 3315 Crystal Bay Rd 3339 Crystal Bay Rd 3349 Crystal Bay Rd 001 3601 Togo Rd 002 2293 Shadywood Rd 002 3485 Crystal PI 002 3472 Livingston Ave 002 3438 Livingston Ave 004 3525 Livingston Ave 005 3472 Lyric Ave 005 3444 Lyric Ave 006 3473 Lyric Ave 006 3468 Shoreline Dr 006 3416 Shoreline Dr r # » LEVY NUMBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13625 17-117-23-43-0137 43620 34.88 008 002 2189 Shadywood Rd 13625 17-117-23-44-0019 43540 150.60 016 —3385 Crystal Bay Rd 13625 17-117-23-44-0029 43540 49a04 027 —2253 Bayviaw PI 13625 17-117-23-44-0033 43540 134.92 031 —2305 Bayview PI 13625 17-117-23- 44-0039 43540 770.58 036 —2260 Bayview PI 13625 17-117-23- 44-0041 43540 97.23 038 —2250 Bayview PI 13625 17-117-23-44-0084 43600 127.05 004 —2350 Olive Ave 13625 17-117-23-44-0085 43168 164.98 -—3340 Shoreline Dr 13625 17-117-23 - 44 -0092 00369 261.88 003 002 3245 Lafayette Ridge Ct 13625 17-117-23- 44-0096 43540 238.26 ——2300 Bayview PI 13625 17-117-23-44-0102 42420 410.10 005 003 2385 Shadywood Rd 13625 18-117-23-14-0005 42220 545.99 004 —1981 Fagemess PtRd 13625 20-117-23-12-0014 42720 671.64 007 002 2447 Carman St 13625 20-117-23-12-0015 42720 434 22 -002 2455 Carman St 13625 20-117-23-12-0021 42720 494.58 -002 2454 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-12-0022 42730 407.99 —002 2428 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-12-0024 42720 68.10 027 002 2400 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-21-0003 43102 670.07 -—2480 Dunwoody Ave 13625 20-117-23-21-0020 42420 569.27 003 007 2520 Dunwoody Ave 13625 20-117-23-21-0024 42420 657.08 004 007 2580 Dunwoody Ave 13625 20-117-23-22-0002 42420 581.09 001 008 3935 Shoreline Dr 13625 20-117-23-24-0013 42020 517.31 —002 2700 Ethel Ave 13625 20-117-23-24-0017 42020 397.80 006 003 2755 Ethel Ave 13625 20-117-23-24-0033 43580 336.95 —-2690 Caroline Ave 13625 20-117-23-31-0030 43088 110.68 -—2990 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-31-0061 43167 22.98 ——2980 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-31-0067 42020 440.23 —004 2868 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-32-0015 43300 653.11 125 —2805 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-32-0016 42020 520.41 —004 2800 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-42-0033 43480 400.67 ——3532 Ivy PI 13625 20-117-23-43-0035 43640 466.20 —-3040 Casco Pt Rd 13625 20-117-23-43-0043 43640 531.56 165 -3277 Casco Cir 13625 21-117-23-^:2-0008 43220 351.16 023 -2530 Old Beach Rd 13625 21-117-23-23-0019 42940 103.64 019 —2690 Pheasant Rd 13625 21-117-23-23-0033 43530 525.05 008 —2700 Kelly Ave 13625 21-117-23-24-0043 43220 161.64 Oil —2610 W Lafayette Rd 13625 21-117-23-24-0065 43085 566.60 ——2740 Shadywood Rd 13625 33-110-23-13-0011 43515 989.24 001 001 2765 Wayzata Blvd 13625 33-118-23-44-0016 42210 302.48 010 002 51 Hackberry Hill 13625 36-118-23-41-0006 42310 147.20 001 001 101 Chevy Chase Dr 13625 36-110-23-44-0006 41370 326.69 002 001 75 North Femdale Rd • V LEVr MBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ^DmON CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS « NOT CHARGE INTEREST ON THE FOULOWINQ ASSESSMENTS 13625 02-117-23-21-0019 42840 82.00 -—145 Smith Av« 13625 02-117-23- 22-0002 41302 32.00 ——15 Orono Orchard Rd S 13625 02-117-23 - 23-0005 41302 82.00 001 001 385 Orono Orchard Rd S 13625 02-117-23- 24-0003 41640 82.00 -—280 Orono Orchard Rd S 13625 03-117-23- 24-0009 03104 82.00 002 001 265 Brown Rd S 13625 03-117-23 - 32 - 0009 42003 82.00 004 001 2240 Fox St 13625 03-117-23- 33-0005 43570 82.00 004 001 2265 Webber Hills Rd 13625 03-117-23- 34-0009 43570 82.00 002 002 2160 Webber Hills Rd 13625 04-117-23-11-0011 02550 82.00 001 003 2565 Countryside Dr 13625 04-117-23-12 - 0005 02550 82.00 ——2705 Watertown Rd 13625 04-117 - 23 - 22 - 0027 41520 82.00 -—3085 Watertown Rd 13625 04-117-23-23-0022 00954 82.00 002 001 3150 Ridgewood Cir 13625 04-117- 23 - 24 - 0006 41520 82.00 ——275 Old Crystal Bay Rd S 13625 04-117 -23 - 24 - 0014 41520 82.00 -—2860 Deer Run Tr 13625 04-117 - 23 - 34 -0013 42227 82.00 003 002 3070 Farview La 13625 04-117 - 23 - 43 - 0021 04349 82.00 003 001 730 Gander Rd 13625 06-117 - 23 - 21-0003 41306 82.00 -—4485 Bayside Rd 13625 06-117-23 - 21-0006 05194 82.00 001 001 4465 Bayside Rd 13625 06-117 -23 - 22 - 0003 41306 82.00 --180 North Shore Dr W 13625 06-117-23-31-0001 43119 82.00 ——420 North Arm Dr 13625 07-117-23-22-0016 03487 82.00 001 001 4701 West Branch Rd 13625 10-117-23-12-0002 41310 82.00 -—920 Brown Rd S 13625 10-117 - 23-13 - 0021 42265 82.00 -003 1135 Heritage Lane 13625 10-117 - 23 - 24 - 0002 41310 82.00 ——1045 Brown Rd S 13625 22-117-23-31-0010 42960 60.00 012 —630 Big Island 13625 22-117-23-31-0029 42960 60.00 —-570 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-22-0009 42660 60.00 047 -750 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-22-0018 42660 60.00 —-120 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-23-0020 42660 60.00 034 160 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-23-J031 42660 60.00 —-140 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-23-0033 42660 60.00 -—230 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-32-0002 42660 60.00 ——460 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-32-0027 42660 60.00 063 —300 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-32-0063 43140 60.00 ——420 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-32-0065 43M0 60.00 -—410 Big Island 13625 23-117-23-32-0070 42660 60.00 ——450 Big Island 13625 25-118-23-34-0006 03152 82.00 003 001 541 North Stream Rd 13625 25-118-23-43-0026 01730 82.00 001 001 235 Hollander Rd i V • LEVY NUMBER 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 n625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 13625 PROPERTY IDENTIRCATION # 25- 118-23-44-0015 26- 118-23-31-0004 26-118-23-33-0024 26- 118-23- 33-0026 27- 118-23-31-0005 27-118- 23- 32 -0003 27-118 -23 - 32 - 0014 27-118-23- 33-0007 27-118-23- 33 - 0010 27-118-23-42-0010 27- 118-23 -43-0006 28- 118-23 - 32 - 0009 28- 118-23 - 33-0014 29- 118-23-43-0011 29- 118-23 - 44-0002 30- 118-23-31-0003 31- 118-23-11-0004 31-118-23-12-0011 31-118-23-12-0018 31-118-23-21-0003 31-118-23-24-0001 31-118 -23 - 33- 0007 31-118-23-41-0001 31-118-23-41-0003 31-118-23-41-0004 31-118-23-41-0005 31-118-23-41-0011 31-118-23-42-0001 31- 118-23-42-0003 32- 118-23-21-0005 32-118-23-22-0005 32-118-23-23-0003 32- 118-23-32-0001 33- 118-23-31-0007 33-118-23-42-0003 35- 118-23-34-0011 36- 118-23-12-0008 36-118-23-33-0009 36-118-23-33-0012 36-118-23-41-0001 ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT 03735 82.00 LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 41326 42390 42390 41327 41327 41327 01693 01693 42470 42470 41328 03491 00851 41329 41330 41331 43210 41331 41331 41331 41331 41331 41331 41331 41331 03794 41331 41331 41332 42820 42820 41332 41333 03842 00394 03510 42710 42710 41336 Total Delinquent Utility Charges Assessments 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 46.00 82.00 62.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 164.00 82 00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 59,867.07 002 009 012 004 007 005 002 001 006 013 Oil 002 006 002 001 007 001 200 Hollander Rd 1300 Sixtti Ave N - 930 Dakota Ava - 1590 Long Lake Blvd 2135 Sixth Ava N 1180 Willow Dr N - 2329 Shadowood Dr 001 744 Dickey Lake Dr 001 770 Dickey Lake Dr 001 1840 Lakeviaw Ter 004 1802 Lakeviaw Iar 3025 Sixth Ave N 001 3175 Jamestown Rd 3465 Sixth Ave N 3265 Sixth Ava N - 4555 Wayzata Blvd 4185 Sixth Ave N 001 4360 Sixth Ava N - 4380 Sixth Ave N - 4560 Watertown Rd - 4480 Watertown Rd - 4740 Bayside Rd - 4040 Watertown Rd - 4045 Watertown Rd - 4105 Watertown Rd - 4085 Watertown Rd - 4115 Watertown Rd - 4245 Chippewa La - 4355 Chippewa La 605 Stubbs Bay Rd N - 640 Orchard Park Rd - 500 Orchard Park Rd - 3940 Watertown Rd - 225 Old Crystal Bay N 001 31 5 Silver Meadow Dr 001 • 1200 Orono Oaks Dr 001 735 North Ferndale Rd 001 10 Myrtlewood Rd 001 90 Myrtlewood Rd - 395 North Ferndale Rd • V 1LEVY PROPERTY a IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS C harge 8% CERTIRCAHON FEE-Pefinquent A/R 13625 04-117-23-22-0027 41520 1,301.00 —3065 Watertown Road 13625 17-117-23-44-0039 43540 420.69 -- 3286 Navame Lane 13625 20-117-23- 32-0006 43300 577.50 -- 2825 Casco Pt Road 13625 17-117-23-43-0051 42740 352.65 -- 3599 Livingston 13625 33-118-23- 34-0016 5124 204.00 -115 Old Crystal Bay Road Total Delinquent Account Receivable Assessments Total All Assassmenta 2,855.84 62,722.91 I* i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: November 20, 1995 ^CJNCIlMEETTNg NOV ? 7 ,995 ‘ OROiyo ITEM NO: Department Appr Nanc Dorothy Halim Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Rem Description: Proposed 1996 Meeting Schedule Attached is a proposed 1996 Meeting Schedule. On this schedule the Council is scheduled to meet the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month. The only e.xception is November where the second Monday is Veterans’ Day therefore the Council meeting is scheduled on the second Tuesday, November 12. Only one Council meeting has been scheduled in December. The Planning Commission is scheduled to meet the 3rd Monday of the month e.xcept in January' and February when the 3rd Monday is a holiday. In those months the Planning Commission will meet on the third Tuesday. As in past years there is no meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled in December. The first Tuesday in May through October has been scheduled for the Planning Commission to use as an alternate meeting date, except June and September when the School Board has meetings scheduled on Tuesday. Planning Commission approved the draft 1996 Meeting Schedule at their November 20th meeting. The Park Commission meetings are scheduled for the first Monday of the month. The only exception is January and September when the meeting is the first Tuesday because of a Monday holiday. Park Commission approved the draft 1996 Meeting Schedule at their November 6th meeting. As of this date, the Orono School Board lias the followi ;g meetings scheduled; Tuesday, January 9 and 23, February 13 and 27, March 12, April 9 and 23. May 14 and 21. June 4. (These dates are noted on the meeting schedule.) All the holidays are indicated with an "X" and Friday, July 5 is shown as the designated holiday. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the 1996 Meeting Schedule 1996 OUONO MI'EIING SCHEDULE - COUNCIL CIlAMUEttSKEY\Ul 7:00 p.iii. Cotiitctl Mccinn 2ml & 4Ui Mumlny (3 7:00 p.in. IManning Commission 3nt Moiuhiy* /\ 7:15 p.m. r:uk Commissiun 1st Moiulay 'V/ 7:00 p.iii. Oroiio Sdionl nuanl/or Ullu'r Event \ ^ Ollicial Unrnlay ♦PLANNING COMMISSION - May through October 1st Tuesday is an alternate meeting date. '"** 199G JanUaiy VJ9G S M T W T r S X 3 4 5 G 7 ffilWIO 11 12 13 14 ‘$^@17 10 19 20 21 ^W24 25 2G 27 30 3120 29 Fubtumy 199G S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 G 7 0 9 10 11 im? 14 15 IG 17 10 21 22 23 24 25^0^20 29 March S M T W T 199G F S April 1996 S M T W T F S 31 JO) 19 24 ra2G G 13 7 14 1 0 15 2 9 IG 2 3 4 6 6 20 21 22 23 27 20 29 30 ipRe.ONC-T L1«k\JC.O^ TiM mwn ^1G 1i \2S^2- to 11 12 13 17 10 19 20 21 20 29 30 24 25 26 27 Juno s M T W T 199G F S G 13 10' 19 20 25 2G 27 7 14 21 20 1 0 15 22 29 199G T F S X X G 11 12 13 10 19 20 AuyiiGl S M 123 24 25 2.G 27 20 29 30 31 u'txD tVR.tS E.UKC-TVOM_____ Seplomhor S 20 30 199G M T W T F 5 X4i1'4/ 5 G 7 q/,lT 12 13 14 ' 10 19 20 21 25 2G 27 20 *2r«<kTis. PVx &A-C.t-T\QU Oduber 199G 5 M T Y/ T F S /V 0‘* 2 3 4 G ^ 0 9 10 1 1 12 13M1G IG 17 10 19 2G Movembor S M T W T 5 20® 22 23 24 25 2 2/^20 30 31 10 X 17 (® AsS\l22il3 20 7 14 21 199G F S 1 2 0 9 15 IG 23 Uoccuibor S M T W 1 A 3 4 0 rOllO 11 1996 F S 6 7 12 13 14 5 * 22 27 30 15 IG 17 10 19 20 2 22 23 24 20 27 20 211 30 31 Ev.«C-T»DH c:’:::ciLr.':anr;3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 7 1995 mOf ORONO DATE: November 22, 1995 ITEM NO = // Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Titk City Administrator tern Description: 1996 Fee Schedule Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report The proposed 1996 Fee Schedule and the Summary Ordinance retlecting the fee changes for 1996 are attaclwd for Council review and approval. The proposed fee schedule includes a 3% increase in the water and sewer fees, increases in planning application fees, and increases in several golf course tees. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the proposed 1996 Fee Schedule and to adopt the Summary Fee Ordinance for publication. I J ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the test of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance Number ____. Second Scries." and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that the publication of tire title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. ► OFHCIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES ORDINANCE NO.____, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTLNG THE 1996 FEE SCHEDtXE AN ORDLNA.NCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 130, SECOND SERIES AND NO. 135, SECO.NT) SERIES. The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number approved by the City Council of the City of Orono on____________ The following section have changes, additions and/or deletions: DESCRIPTION ZONING APPLICATIONS VARIANCE (Flexible applications involving more than one variance will require an additional $50.00 payment per each variance) Variance for Non-Conforming Structures RENTiWAL VARIANCE (No change from original application) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project) Residential Accessory Use (Animals, etc.) Institutional Use (School. Church, etc.) Duplex Credit (per building) Guest 1 louse/Guest Apartment Commercial/Industrial Use Non-Conforming Use Land Alteration: Grading, filling, etc. (over 100 cubic yards) Sea walls, retaining w'alls within 0-75 lakeshore Renewal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original application) , Second Series . 1995. 1995 19% FEE ¥EE $200.00 $220.00 $200.00 $220.00 $100.00 $120.00 i) $125.00 $175.00 $200.00 $250.00 $150.00 $200.00 $175.00 $225.00 $250.00 $300.00 $200.00 $250.00 $200.00 $250.00 $100.00 $150.00 2 r'w’ PESQUmON ZOWING AFHJCATION Continued Conditional Use Pennit with VariaDce COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan (Class I, n. & m) Subdivision Applkation (Class I & II Subdivisions, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) Renewal of Subdivision Application (Class 1 & II, Subdiv ision of a Lot LiiK Rearrangement) (No change from original application) 199S 1996 FEE FEE Add $50.00 for Add $75.00 for each variance each vahaiKe $200.00 plus $250.00 plus Consultant Fee Consultant Fee $200.00 $250.00 $300.00 $350.00 Rearrangement) $325.00 + $25/lot $375.00 + $25/lot ($400.00/3 lots;($450.00/3 lots; $425.00/4 lots)$475.00/4 lots) $175.00 + Special Legal/$200.00 + Special Legal^ Engineering Engineering $150.00 $200.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application (Class III) (No change from original application) $150.00 $200.00 Renewal of Final Subdivision Application (No change from original application) $100.00 $150.00 PUBUC ROAD VACATION $ 50.00 per benefitting property ($250.00 min. per appl.) $ 75.00 per benefitting property ($300.00 min. per appl.) EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION Al^PLICATIONS $75.00 $100.00 EASE.MENT VACATIONS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS $175.00 $200.00 I giyy.jTk .TiifitAM .Ji 1995 £££. ZONING APPLICATIONS Conimutd ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING $300.00 PUD Rezoning: Residential $300.00 + $40.00 per dwelling unit REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN $300.00 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND LNSPECTION FEES BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42" also multiple tiered walls that exceed 42" and not located in lakcshore protected area) S 15.00 $ 15.00 MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT Water 5/8" meter including sales tax 3/4" meter including sales tax 1" meter including sales tax $135.00 $185.00 $240.00 ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES Various Charges ALL MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES Various Charges SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Well Site ln.spection No Charge LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM SEPTIC INSTALLERS LICENSE - Annual SITE EVALUATOR LICENSE - Annual S 50.00 $100.00 1996 £££_ $350.00 $350.00 4- $40.00 per dwelling unit $350.00 $21.00 $ 21.00 $139.00 $191.00 $247.00 Various Charges Reflecting Cost of Investment Various Charges Reflecting Cost of Investment Deleted $ 35.00 Deleted Deleted ^ 141 V LIJC 1995 1£EL 1996 FEE UCENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES General Adminisoative Documents Assessment Search • Written (Verbal searches not given) $ 10.00/parccI $ 15.00/parcel Current Street Address Book $ 12.75 $ 15.00 Police Department Administered Firearms Permit to Carry m m $ 10.00 HNGERPRINTING SERVICE $ 10.(X)/application $ 15.00/application (resident only) COPY SERVICE - Police Records First Two Copies Additional Copies $ 3.00 $ 0.50 each $ 5.00 $ 0.25 each COPY OF ACCIDENT REPORTS $ 3.00 $ 5.00 COPY OF DRIVER’S UCENSE RECORD $ 3.00 $ 5.00 COPY FROM MICROFICHE FILE First Two Copies Additional Copies $ 5.00 $ .25 $ 10.00 $ .50 i TAPE DUPUCATION $ 10.00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Utility Service Rates - Effective beginning First Quarter 1996 MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by Unit; 1st 2nd $ 69.90 per quarter $ 63.25 per quarter $ 72.00 per quarter $ 65.15 per quaner by Flow:$ 2.63/1000 gal plus $6.65 per quarter per connection $ 2.63/1000 gal plus $6.85 per quarter per connection Smbbs Bay Area Un-Connected Properties $ 31.65 per quarter $ 32.60 per quarter 1995 FEE 1996 FEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTS 131^ MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Nayairc Billing Sc Ready to Serve Charge Water Usage Rate Unconnected Propcrt)’ Charge Hwv 12 Area: Billing Sc Ready to Scr\e Charge Water Usage Rate Che\^ Chase Area: Billing Sc Ready to Serve Charge Water Usage Rate Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area Arca#l Rate Brush Drop Off Fee Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes 2nd Nine Hole (Weekday after 12:00 noon) League Rates Monday thru Friday $ 20.10/qtr $ 20.70/qtr $ 1.71/1000 gal $ 1.76/1000 gal $ 20.10/qtr S 20.70/qtr $ 7.40/qtr $ 7.60/qtr $ 2.37/1000 gal $ 2.44/1000 gal $ 7.40/qir $ 7.60/qtr $ 1.89/1000 gal $ 1.95/1000 gal S 20.10/qtr plus $ 20.70/ qtr plus $ 1.71/1000 gallon $ 1.76/1000 gallon total flow at border meter total flow at border meter $ 3.00 per cubic yard Deleted $ 1.00 minimum fee n Deleted $ 7.25 $ 7.50 $ 8.75 $ 9.00 $ 6.25 $ 6.50 - -$ 5.00 $ 8.25 $ 8.50 1995 rEE.. 1996 FEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Continued GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1996 Season Continued FALL RATES Will begin the Monday nearest the 15th of Sept. - Weekend Rates: 1st Nine 2nd Nine Riding Cart $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 7.00/per nine Weekday Rates: 1st Nine 2nd Nine Sr. & Jr. Riding Cart $ 5.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 5.00/per nine A printed copy of the 1996 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk during regular office hours. This ordinance becomes effective the week of January 1, 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this __________ . 1995, by a vote of____ayes and_____nays. day of ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric tuiMiwry 9ft L I DtRECTOWY FOR 1996 FEE SCHEDULECopfChmtmPageLicenses A MisceHeneotrs iContI Page P»mits (Conti PageMnMtitmion21Garbage Haulers License 19 Sprinkler Systems -Acchtont Itoportt 24 Home Occupation License 20 Commercial 10BuMktg Plan Coplaa 21 Joint Use Dock License 19 Tripping Permit (Limited)23Copy Mim»flcha F9e • Pl>24 Kennel License 21 Undergrourrd Tank Removal 9 Copy Sarvioa - PoSca Dopt 24 SoHdtation License 20 Water Meter Fees 10 Raprint Ovaraizad Documonts Temporwy Trtfer/BuBding On MicrofUffl 21 License 20 Services Tap# Waoor»ing DupPcallon 21 Fingerprinting (Police)24 (PoNca OapU 24 Maps For Sale 20 Water Turn-Off Charge 26 Connuetton Charge Water Turn-On Charge 26 PuMc Works Suppties A S&vices Sanitary Sowar 11 Driveway Culverts 28 S^s Municipal Water IS Driveway/Curb Cut Permits 28 Street Signs (Public Works)28 Documents Tmnporary & Permanent 16 Permits Temp. "No Parking" (P.D.)24 Comprehensive Guide 20 After-The-Fact Fees 5 Temp. "No Parking" (P.W.)28 Spodai Assessment Searches 21 Building Permit Fees 8 Municipal Code/Ordinance 20 Burning Permit Fee 18 Utittty Rate A MisceHeneous 25 Realtors Listing Info 21 Cert, of Occupancy 8 Annual Service Charge • Demolition Permit Fee 8 Septic 15 fa/se Alarm User Faa 23 Docks:Recycling Charge 26 Commercial 8 Recycling Replacement Bins 26 Golf Course Rates 27 Residential 8 Rre Protection 18 Zoning AppFcations Inspections Firearms Discharge Permit 23 After-The Fact Fees 5 Contractual Inspection Firearms Permit To Carry 23 Amendments 3 Service 19 Fireworks Permit Fes 23 Appeal of Admin. Decision 6 Special Inspection Charges 18 Grading Excavating, Filling 16 Commercial Site Plan 2 Large Assembly Permits 23 Conditional Use Permit Fees 1 Licenses A Miscellaneous Lawn Sprinkler System 18 Industrial Revenue Bond Appl.5 After-The-Fact Fees 5 Mechanical Permit Fees 9 Dedication Fees 7 Amusement Devices 23 Move/Lift Building Permit Fee 17 PUD Rezoning 3 Animal Impound Fees 22 Municipal Hook Up Rezoning Application Fee 3 Beer, Wine & Liquor License 22 (Sewer/Water)10 Rip Rap Application Fee 5 Cigarette License 20 On-Site Systems (Septic)15 Special Improvements Appl.4 Commercial Marina License 19 Outhouse Construction 15 Subdivision Application Fee 2 Dog License 21 Parades & Special Events 23 Surcharge for Staff Expense 5 Dance (Public) License 23 Plumbing Permit 9 Vacation Application Fee 3 Cambling/Raffle License 20 Retaining Walls 8 Variance Application Fee 1 ORDINANCE NO.____.SECOND SEMESIDINANCE ADOmNG THE I9W fEE SCHEDULE AN ORDINANCE REFEAUNG ORDINANCE NO. IM.SiCCOND SERIES AND NO. 135 SECXXH> SERIES The City Co«indl of the City of Orooo ordains Section 1. Ordinance Repealed. Ordnance No. 13fl Second Series, entitled 1995 Fee Schedule and No. 135. $cc< Scrict odMIcd AnMndncnl to 1995 Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. The City Council of Orono per Section 1.05 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following fees effective during the calendar year I99ds SECTION 1. Feci. ZONING APPLICATIONS All fees arc application fees and arc non-rtfondabte after staff work has begun on the application. Application Type Fee Applicable Code Section VARIANCE $220.00 10.06, Subd 3 (D) (Flexible applications involving more than one variance will require an additional $50.UU payment per each variance) Variance for Non-Conforming Structures $220.00 RENEWAL VARIANCE $120.00 10.06. Subd 3 (D) (No change from original application) CONDITIOMAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project)10.09, Subd 3 Resident'.al Accessory Use (Animals, etc.)$175.00 10.09, SuImI 3 lastitutional Use (Sch<M>l, Church, etc.)$250.00 10.09, Subd 3 Duplex Credit (per building)$200.00 10.09, Subd 3 Guest House/Guest Apartment $225.00 Commercial/Industriai Use $300.00 10.09, Subd 3 Non-Conforming Use $250.00 10.09, Subd 3 1 ApoMcrtton TvptCONDmONAL USE P£JL\Ut Continued (One Charitc per Project) Grmttnf, mUng, etc. (over 100 cubic jards) Sea waUi, retaining walk within 0-75* hkeshore PRD Application with Subdivision FRD Application without Subdiviskm PID Applications Renewal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original applicatUm) Conditional Use Permit with Variance After-the-Fact Fees COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan (Class 1. II. & 111) Subdivision Application (Class 1 & 11 Subdivisions, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rcarrangcmciit) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-rrsidrntial) Final Plat Review (Clavs III) Filing Fees: a) Subdivision only b) Subdivision + Eascinciits & Covenants Renewal of Subdivision Application (Class 1 & II, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearnuigcinriit) (No Change Fn>m Original Application) tss Applicable Code Sectioii10.09, Subd 3 $250.00 F permit Subdivisi«»n Fee plus $30.00 per dwelling unit $ 35.00 per dwelling unit (minimum $150.00) $150.00 per acre (minliiiuiii $350.00) $156.00 Add $ 75.00 for each variance Double Application Fee Res. #l.t06 & #1309 $250.00 F OmsuKant Fee $250.00 $350.00 11.10, Subd 7(A) 11.10, Subd 10(A) (D) $375.00 + $25/lot 11.10, Subd 10(C) ($450/3 lots; $475/4 lots) $200.00 + Special Legal/Engincering Charges 11.10, Subd 17(A) (9) $75.00 11.10, Subd 17 (A) (II) $200.(K) Minimum plus any additional costs $200.00 aowwo AffLICAl I ki [i)f-.Tat SUBDIVISION CoatiniKd Hi Rencwd of Prdlaiiwiry Sobdi^isioii Appikatiofi (Clam IID (No diaiigc Brom migiiial appUcatlon) Reiewal of Final Sobdi^hion ApplicalMm (No cliaiife from ori|>iiial application) PUBLIC ROAD VACATION EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS EASEMENT VACATIONS NDI ASSOCIATED W1 III SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDINt; REZf)NING PUD Rezoning - Allowed only within area adjacent to Highway 12 os detined in Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 PUD Rezoning: Residential Commercial/Indiutrial REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Fee Applicable Code Section $200.00 $150.00 $ 75.00 per benefilting Section ICMl property ($300.00 minimum per application) $100.00 Si'ciion 10. II $200.00 Section 10.11 $350.00 Section 10.11 Ord. 74, 2nd Series Section 10.53 $350.00 + $40.00 per dwelling unit $150.00 per acre (min. $350.00) $350.00 Section 10.11 i 1 f«vZONING AHPLiCATIONS (CONT.t llfiS SPEHAL IMPROVEMENTS NoB-RTiiiidable charges for City Engineer’s review for applicatiuns and drrig“ drawing, including construction inspection fees. If improvements arc proposed as part of a Subdivision, Review Charges arc payable with Preliminary Plat application. Proposed Private Ronds Proposed Public Roads Request for City u> accept existing private road Request for CHy to maintain unimproved public road Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Proposed Watermain Extension Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) On-Site System - Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applicntions) Applicable Code Section Section 11.12, Subd 4 $600.00 plus 5(W/1ineal foot $900.00 plus 50C/lineal foot $900.00 $200.00 $250.00 plus $25.00 per stub $250.00 plus $25.00 per stub $200.00 $ 50.00 per new lot proposed fur un*sUc J APrUCAIICMMS fCONT.l AnnMcatlon Tvae RIPRAP Stair Review (normal rip-rap) UmmmI Rip-Rap: a) New imtalialion b) Repair previously approved APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND APPLICATIONS Minim— Project Valuation: $250,000.00 AppUcation F«: Applicable Code S No Charge $100.00 ^ CUP review Starr pcniiit - $100.00 $100.00 10.65, Subd 3 (D) 0.1% of project valuation ($250.00 minimum) plus $5,000.00 deposit for legal/ administrative expenses SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF AITEICAHON FEES Per Fee Schedule set forth below: Professional Time Clerical Time Legal/Engineering Coasultaiits Milcagc/Copies/Postage/Etc. AFTER-THE-FACT APPLICATION INVESTIGATION FEF.S (Resolution 1306) (Applies to all application types including variances, conditional use permits, subdivision, naing amendments, rip-rap permits, special improvement reviews, grading permits, moving permits, business licenses, kennel licenses, all building permits and all general permits.) This permit fee may be waived by staff for resident property owners who have not involved a contractor in their work, have no previous history of work without a permit and where such work does not entail any zoning violations. Section 10.11 $ 30.00/hour $ 18.00/hour Actual Billed Cost Actual Cost r 5 •vVl Iw C APPLICATIONS fCONT.tAim>TnMrACT ArrUCATION INVECTIGATION ikes CoatiMMd tes Applicable Code Seclioii Wkenevcr any work, ise or (Ut IsIoii of land for whkh a formal application is reqniml has been CMMMnead wHIwi first making sadi appUcathm and rerd^ina Cil} approtal theriTure, a ■pedal faiTCStigation of the drcumstanccs shall be made during the application process. Became of Ike extra administrative costs ut>ulvcd in the special inrestigation, the minimom appikatioa fee for aftcr>tlie-fact applicatiom shall be twice the fee set forth in the basic fee schcdidc, whether or not the application b thereafter approved or denied. Payment of an aficr-thc-fad application fee shall not constitiUe approval or authorization of the work, use, or (Vviaion of land, and shall not constitute a penalty or a waiver of the right of the City to institnte dril or crimiml legal actiom a^nst the applicant for commencing such work, use or division of land without the required prior apiMoval of the City. After-tlm-fact Invmtigation Fee Amount:Equal to and in addition to the basic fee amount (total fee is tuice the basic fee amounts. Res. 1306 t .C APPUCATIONS <CONT.I PARK INDICATION ¥EES 1 Ltad Pcdkatioii Minimum Area - Subdividcrs shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, phygrouads, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimiim that perceutage of gros land area, or other such amount as ma} be determined by the City Council, us set Toilh below; (1) RoMcallal/Agricultural/Multipic Residential Zoned Land DetUcation requirement of 8% of the land being pbtied or subdis ided. (Eiiclusive of lot that includes an existing residence.) (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Lund. Dctttcated requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdi^ ided. Cash Contribution In Lieu of l^nds. In those Instances where a cash contribution b to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. Applicable CasRSwtion Municipal Code Section 11.62 ilO] N PERMITS AND INSPECTION ttES BUILDING PERMIT MlaiaiMR Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial Rcshknllal Bonding Valiutkm Standard ZONING CERTIHCATE OF OCCUPANCY WITIIOUT BUILDING PKICVm (change in ose) Applicable Fee Code Set t ion (Ord. 216) $ 21.00 (per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Sthrdulc) 65% of iliiilding Permit Fee (per Current l.C.B.O. Building Siundurds/Building Valuali«>n Data) $ 50.00 RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42" also multiple tiered walh that exceed 42" and not located in lakeshore protected arta) NOI'E: Retaining walls in 0-75’ lakeshore proleeird /one - see Cond. Use Permit section of fee schedule. $21.00 ininlniuni (per 1994 UBC Standard Schedule) TREE REMOVAL WITHIN 0-75’ DOCKS • RESIDENTIAL (Permanent and Initial Seasonal) DOCKS - COMMERCIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT Principal Structure $ 30.00 $30.00 Ord. 10.22 Subd 3 Acc^ory Structure Per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule (Ord. 216) $ 50.00 Initial inspection $ 25.00 for each requested or required inspection beyond initial inspection $ 30.00 Initial inspection CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION i-TES (t ONT.)ffetmit TvBi PLUMBING PERMIT Mail-in postage & handlii^ charge MECHANICAL PERMIT Minimiim Fee for any Mechanical Permit MaiMn postage A handling charge Hal. Single Family A Duplen by Unit Type Under Ground Tank Removal Apidkable Co^ Section $ 35.00 nUnimum per project 1.25% of contract price $ 1.50 $ 35.00 per project $ 1.50 1.25% of contract price Per mechanical permit fee^; <>« mPERMITS AND INSTECnON FEES (CONT.l R—rit Ti . ladurtriil and MuRi-Fainilv ReMdentlat by Unit Tviw SPRINKLER SYSTEMS • COMMERCIAL -flrt sprinkler systems •kHchrn fire extinguishing sy stem MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area connection charges) Sewer Water 5/8” meter InclutHng sales (ax 3/4” meter including sales (ax I” meter including sales tax larger meter Mail-In postage & handling charge (sewer and water permits only) Fee Applicable Code S $ 35.00 minimum fee 1.25% of contract price $ 35.00 minimum fee 1.25% of contract price l*Ian Review = 65% permit fee Surcharge based on valuation $ 35.00 per sy stem $35.00 $35.00 $139.00 $191.00 $247.00 quote basis $ 1.50 ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (II not previously assessed or if an improvement projectis not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connecion charge may be in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are UKated outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections arc subject to City Council approval. SEWER PROJECTS By District - Project 1963 ST- lA, LS- lA, ST- 111, LS- 111 Fixed Charge + S225.00 Unit Charge 4* /\rca Or Acreage Charge + $498.00 /acre Front Foot Charge $3^05 Credit To Area (1) 1964LS-1A or LS-IH $225.00 $.36.90 (1) 1965 LS-1 $225.00 $.54.35 (1) 1965 LS-IA $225.00 r3f6o (1) 1967 LS-1 $2.37.00 $23.65 (1) 1969 LS-1 Shore Hills $225.00 $11,7.3.5.00 (1) 1%9 LS-2 Chevy Chase 18,407.00 (1) 1970 LS-1 Saga Hill $2L5.00 $4,600.00 $27.70 (1) 1971 LS—1 Dunwoody $22.5.00 $4,095.00 $25.15 (1) 1973-1 $7,941.00 $37.65 (1) 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs $10,149.00 (1) 1980 — 1 West Ferndalc/County Road 15 $29,66.3.00 (1) 1980-1 Orono Lane $19,004.00 (1) 1980 —1 County Road 15/Marinas $7,911.00 (1) 1980-2 North Shore Drivc/Scotch Pine Lane $27,970.00 (1) 1981-1 North Shore Drivc/Ilighwood $ll 140.00 (1) 1982-lA Navarre Utilities $2,587.00 $1,062.00 trunk area (3) 1982 — IB Navarre Utilities Northern Avenue $22.5.00(1)$210.00 (3)$2,795.00 per acre (3) }(1)&(3) (trunk unit acre/unit)} 1985-1 Crystal Bay $12,269.00 (4) 1983-1 Highway 12 Orono-Long Eakc-Mcdina $i,i 5.3.00 (1) 1989 Highway 12 - Pha.se I - North Side $i, 102.00 (1) Brown Rd to Willow Drive 1989 Highway 12 - Phase II - I’uture Trunk lixpansion $2,025.00 (1) C R E: 1) I I I O A R i : A : (1) 602-376 91 Sewer Operating (3U02^769 1 ! 982 I mprovc & #6 Hy Pass (4) 304-37691 i985 Improve Crystal Hay (5) 406-37691 PJj^Eynd ^71^ &_jHirc^ajn (6) .308 -37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION OIARGES (If not previously assessed or if an impros-cmenl projectis not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connecion charge may he in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which arc located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections arc subject to City Council approval. SEWER PROJECTS By District - Project 1992 Stnbbs Bay Sewer ________1 Stubbs Bay NE/NW - Bayside East Fixed Charge + II Bederwood III Bayside North IV Oxford V Cygnet and Leaf Unit (.'harge + $ 1.^.8 l.t.tX) $21.38^00 ^i8,ioio6 $2.V50.qo $20,6.50.00 Area Or Acreage Front l-'ot)t Charge + Charge Credit To Area 1984 Forcemain and Lift Station #7 upgrade: (An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from the 1984 forcemain and lift station #7 upgrade, as follows, sec map for affected areas):All Charges Arc Per Unit _ Existing Propert ies/IntTcasc New Bldgs Replacing lixistirig Bldgs (If usage increases from existing) Fixed Charge + #6 By Pass + #7 I'orccmain ____________ ____$468.50 $468.50 New Resident ial w/F'xisting Stub $1,.L55.00 New Residential without Stub $225.0 0(1)____$209..5Q(.4) $ I,.4.55.00 (5) Freshwater Biological 1989 Gravity Line and Lift Station #10 By Pass: An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from the 1989 gravity line and lift station # 10 by-pass per Resolution #2671; (see map for affected areas) _ _ _ _ _ ______ $22 5,00 C: R E D I 1 T O A K i: A : Fixed Charge + # 10 By Pa.ss $2,.19.4.00 (1) 602-.4 769 1 Sewer Operating (■^). ■*06-37691 PIR Fund #7I.S & Forcemain (.3) .302-37691 1982 Improve & #6 By Pass (6) 308-.37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay (4) .304-.37691 1985 Improve Crystal Bay “ " ________ (1L(.3)&(5) _____$225.00(1) $209..5 0 (3) $527.50 (5) (1), (3) & (5) per unit on connection (previously assessed $2,000/acre) •* V-'ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or if an improvement projectis not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connecion charge may be in addition to any assessment.) The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections are subject to City Council approval. WATER PROJECTS 1989 Highway 12 - Phase I - North S^dc __ Water Trunk — llrown Rd to Willow Drive $644.00 1989 Highway 12 - Phase 11 -$4,719.00 Water Tower, Well, & Pumphouse C R E D I I I O AREA: (1) 601-3 7.491 Water Opcratjng__ (2) .102-.47.^91 1982 Improve water By District - Project 1967 LW-1 lliKhway 12/Crystal Bay Road Fixed Unit Charge + Charge + $4,119.00 Area Or Acreage Charge + Front Foot Charge $.10.60 Credit To Area (1) 1969 1 W-2 Chevy Chase $4,082.00 (1) 1970 LW-1 Navarre Residential $2,0.19.00 $20.35 (1) 1970 LW —1 Navarre Commercial $.1,060.00 $.10.60 (1) 1982- lA Navarro $2,17.1.00 (2) lUCnON PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.)Fenmk Trot Applicable Code SectionON-SITE SYSTEMS Desifta Review Fees SvbdivWoa SHe Evahudion Report Review IRcsideiitlal System Permit: Repair existing system New/Replaccment System Non>Rcsidential System Permit: New or Total replacement Partial replacement Annual Service Charge (Ord. 210) Included with permit fees $ 50.00/per new kit $50.00 $100.00 -t- $20.(K) per each inspection oier 3 (Includes outhouse on llig Ishmtl) $100.00 -t- $20.00 per each inspection over 4 $ 60.00 -h $20.00 per each inspection over 2 $ 50.00/s}steiii/year plus an additional $10.00 fc'' for late penalty plus interest fur unpaid charges certified Sectiuii 12.30, Subd 8(C) Permit Type GRADING, EXCAVATION, ULIING - 1-100 cubic yard ( max. 10 loads) - lOI -{- cubic vards Apidicahle Code Section $ 50.00 (staff permit) engineering fees if required ($i 00.00 if engineering fee necessary ) $ 75.00 4- Conditional Use Permit 4- $25.00 per each inspection over 1st NOTE: 101 cubic yards or more requires a Conditional Use Permit unless approvetl as psirt of building permit. .Li'N PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.)cowmin™ FttaHTrpy mJIUNNG MOVING OR 1 IFTING is. Applicable Code Section (Ord. 227) Fees for this activity are addition to required buihfing or demolition pcmiiis. Fees and an\ necessarv surcharges are requirrtl to pas costs of building code inspections, public works inspections «»f streets and reasonable police escort service on oversire movements. •Lifting acccMory buiidmgs (no move across lot lines) -Lming principal buildings (no move acrom lot lines) (Includes pre-lift inspection fee) •Moving accemory building within normal highway clearance (max. 8'6" widc/max. 13*6" high/mat. 48* long •Moving acc^ory building larger than normal highway clearance •Moving principal buildings over any lot line, onto or off any lot within Orono; includes any move on or over any City street even if not originating or term inating in Orono (includes ah over size loads exceeding 8*6" wide and/or 13*6" high 48* long). -Prennove code inspection, principal buildings: a) Building within Orono to be relocated within Orono b) Building outside Orono to be moved into Orono (max. radius 25 miles) $30.00 $75.00 -I- engineering fee If necssary No muv lug permit required $ 50.00 $i 50.00 $ 50.00 $150.00 irrs AND INSPECTION FEES fCONT.) rtfwH.IyiK SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site InspcctkM without permit (wheo called by owner) Inspcctioa eurcharge for work or apptkatkm on Big Uland or Dccrlng Island Rdnspcction fee aBcr failure to comply with Bididing, Septic «>r Zoning Code Correction Notice - 3rd trip fIRE PROTECTION Fire Prevention Inspection Fire Code Permits Commercial Fire Alarm Plan Review Fee LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM BURNING PERNUTS Up to 5 times per year For Each Reinspection More than 5 times per year (for all organifations and individuals regardlcK of tax status) Applicable Code Section $ 30.00 $30.00 per trip -f boat rental if transportation is not provided by owner $ 30.00 per trip + $30.00 per hoar after 1st hour (Ord. 223) No Charge $ 30.00 each Per UBC Schedule 65% of permit fee $35.00 No Charge $ 20.00 $100.00 CONsnUUCnON permits and inspection fees (CONT.) Pcmiit Type CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERV ICE Monthly R* **«in«’ Fn (Inciudts cicrkal tine) Inspection Chaq^e Plan Review Charge Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical MM b eXCCMivc) LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Zionine Department Administered COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application & Inspection Fee (annual) piis: •late fee JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application Fee Plus mch slip Late Fee GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE - Hat rate • per hauler - transfer fee Applicable £££ Per Contract $ 25.00 per month $ 15.00 per inspection SRC/UBC Schedule $ 15.tM) per hour Code S AlllUl $300.00 $200.00 $100.00 $50.00 $20.00 $ 2.00 $ 25.00 $30.00 $ 15.00/truck $ 30.00 I KM 3!LLANEOUS CHARGES fCONT.) B rz\ HTyw 5 OCCUPATION LICENSE TB^IFORARY TRAH.ERS ft BUILDINC'.S UCENSE Zoning DcDMtinciit Adminhtergd ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS ConprrlMMive Guide Plan • 1980 (with amendments) Munkipal Code Book • complete (Ch. 1-12 w/revLsions) Municipal Code Book • Portions Ch 1 thru 9 (Book I) w/revislons Ch 10 thru 12 (Book 2) w/rcvlsious Ch 10 only (Zoning Code) w/revisions Ch 11 only (Siduliv. Code) w/revisions Other Individual Chapters Binder Comp. Plan Amendment #2 (llwy 12) City Maps Topographic Information Building ft Planning rublirations General Administrative Licenses Cigarette Sales Licenses • per quarter Gambling ft Raffle License Solicitation License Up to 10 solicitors - $1.00 each additional solicitor in Orono. Applirant must list only persons that will solicit in Oruno. Api^icabie Code Section $ 50.00 Initial Review Fee $ 30.00 (Aiiiiual Review Fee) $ 30.00 130.00 $ 60.00 w/binder $ 35.00 loose $ 35.00 loose $ 25.00 loose $ 15 00 kMise $ .25/page $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 each $ 12.00 per acre -f engineering cuasUltant fee if computer diskette is required As Posted • Prices subject to change $ 5.00 5.24 $ 10.00 5.23 $ 20.00 5.30 UCENSES A MISCELLANEOUS CiURGES (CONT.> fjmeni Docwnents Contluued As^anmt Scardi - Writtra (VctiMl searches not f>hcu) Copy Service (for psAOc City records itnly) 1 r X 17" copies iMUvidual copies Ordinances (1 copy) R^riiil of Oversized Documents that Invc been microfilmed Building nan Copies and'ur Tape Rccordtag Duplication Cnrrcnt Street Address Book Does & Kennels DOG LICENSES Biannual Ucense (issued in odd years) Annual License (issued in even years only) KENNEL LICENSES Commercial Applicalion & Inspection Fee (Annual) Residential Application & Ins|>cct!un Fee (Annual) NOTE: Dogs kept In residential kennels must be individually licensed. Residential kennel fee is in additioii to dug license fees. Applicable Code Section $ 10.00 $ 15.00/parccl $ .25 each $ 1.00 each No Charge C«isf <»f copy ing sen ke, Messenger service 8t Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 Cost of Copy ing, Messenger Service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 (entire amount to be paid upon request) $ 15.00 9.12 $ 15.00 $ 7.50 $150.00 $ 25.00 5.36 It MBCBLLANEOtJS CHARGtS <CONt.)Pfcftt TnnCS AT LARGE • RELEASE m Fkit orrcM Sccowl OfT Third (XT After lloar & Weekend Release Charge animals at large (Other than dogs) - Release Fee First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAI. Police Department Adminisferttl BEER, WINE & I.1QUOR LICENSES Initial Investigation On-Salr/Off-Snlr Li(|Uor In state investigation Out state investigation Initial Investigation - Bcer/Wine OfT'Sale Liquor License Bond Requirement On>Sale Liquor IJcense On*Sale Wine License 3.2 Beer Off-Sale (Annur.1) 3.2 Beer On-Sale (Annual) Setup (Annual) Club Liquor License (weekday) (Sunday) Temporary Set-up Permit (one day) Temporary Beer Permit (one day) Applicable Code Section9.12 $20.00 $30.(» $40.00 $45.00 9.13 $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 $ 20.00/hour $ 20.00 plus .25 mile (total distance) Actual Cost $500.00 per License Collected at Application Actu.ll cost up to $10,00 Actual cust $l50.00/|»erson $150.00 $5,000.00 $4,000.00 $750.00 $25.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $100.00 $2(MMKI $ 25.00/each $ 15.00/each Re- 1306 4.30 4.30 4.40 4.20 4.20 4.60 4.50 4.50 4.61 4.21 i 'tak' k .i.fa—ii.f.aaaa * LICENSES A MlSCra J.ANEOUS aiARGES (CONT.tAwMfftiQiiTm Mice Deoartmtftt Admlnktwed - Continued AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per EstabiMnnent (Annual) Per Machine Fee PUBUC DANCE LICENSE (annual) (Inditidual Permit) LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT nREWORKS PERMIT FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT Occasional (limited use) Game Animals (limited use) Annual (Club Only) FIREARMS PERMIT TO CARAY LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMll FALSE ALARM USER FEES First 3 raise alarms/colcndar year (i-3 total) Next 7 false alarms/calendar year (4-10 total) Next 5 false alarms/calciidar year (iI-15 total) Each additional false alarm over 15/ calendar year ApplicableCode Section 5.20 $100.00 F machine fee $ 25.00 each $100.(K) $ 10.00 $50.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 10.00 $ 20.00 5.21 5.21 5.25 9.10 9.10 $50.00 9.11 Ord. 2M Ord. 24* 6.08 No Charge $ 50.00 eat h call $100.00 each cull $150.00 each call ucEHasii*LLANEOUS CHARGES fCONT.)ApiilkaliQa Ttix Pnlirr * Continued fINGEItPIUNTING SERVICE COPY SERVICE • Poikf Records Flr^ Two Copies AddHio—I Copies COPY OF ACCIDENT RtPOR l S COPY OF DRIVER’S LICENSE RECORD COPY FROM MICROnCIlE FILE Find Two Copies Additional Copies "NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE" paper sifins (no lath included) TAPE DUPLICATION AppikabieCode Section $ 15.00/appliaition - RESIDENT ONLY (Citizcusliip No Charge) $ 5.00 $ 0.25 each $ 5.00 each $ 5.U0 each $ 10.00 $ .50 each $ 0.25 cadi $ 10.00 ft«UC WORKS DtyARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES UttttT Stnrice Rata • EffccUre besinnitiR flr^ Qrarter 1996 MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: 2nd by flow: $ 72.00 per quarter $ 65.15 per quarter $ 2.71/1000 gallon pins $6.85 per quarter per connection MlMClPAL SEWER RATE STUBBS BAY AREA F^OJECT For those properties unconnected between 16 moiitbs after KTvke arallability and op to 5 years after sen ice availability and meeting the criteria s>et forth in Ordinance No. 105, Second Series, allowing for h<M>kiip time extension, shall be charged only for the City portion of the sewer unit rate and not for the .MWCC portion of the sewer unit rate. Stubbs Bay Area Un-Connected Properties $ 32.60 per quarter mimic wnaKS PBFAItTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES fCONT.)UtiiitT Senriee Rate - ConthwitJAreaMUNICIPAL WATER EATES Navarre Hwy 12 Area Chevy Chase Area fiUU^ R Ready to Serve Chg Wattf Usage Rate UacoMMctcd Property Chg (ready to serve/hydrant chg) $20.70/qtr $7.60/qtr $7.60/qtr $ 1.76/1000 gal $2.44/1000 gal $1.95/1000 gal $20.70/qtr -0- -0- Fcdcrally Mandated Safe Drinking Water Testing Program (Cluirged per service ctMtnedion) $ 5.21 per year on second quarter hilling Balk sale to Minnetonka Beach fur l.ara>ette Ridge Area - Area #1 Kate $20.70/qtr billing charge plus $1.76/1000 gallon total flow at border meter. Penalty for late payment of sewer/wakr bills - 15% after 45 days from billing date. Interest at on unpaid water/sewer bills certified. Water Tum-On Water Tum-off $ 17.50 $ 17.50 Water System Repair/Replaeement if damage caused by property owner: Labor • Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost RECYCLING CHARGE Recycling Container • Initial Replacement (including sales tax) $ 22,(M)/year No Charge $ 6.50 each fUBLIC WORKS PEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS OfARGES (CONT .^Fee GOLF COURSE CHARGES • Effecttre date 19M Season Monday thru FHday (exciudii^ Holidays^ Regia Flay Before 12:00 Noon 2nd Nine Holes Season Ticket (Senior Citi/ens Only) $ 5.00 $125.00 GOLF CART RENTAL Motorized: 1st Nine Holes (Aflrr 12:00 & VVeckentJs) $ lO.Oti 2nd Nine Holes $ 8.00 Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Pull Carts - Per Round G<df clubs - Per Round $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.50 STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 - I» Begin Play Before Noon Monday • Friday, Excludi*.; Holidays 1*. Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ 5.00 $ 5.00 CONCESSIONS /\s Posted 1st Nine Holes $7.50 FAU. RATES 2nd Nine Holes $5.00 Will begin the Monday nearest the IStb of September. After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes $9.00 - Weekend Rates: 2nd Nine Holes $6.50 1st Nine $7.50 2nd Nine Holes $5.00 2nd Nine $5.00 (Weekday ARer 12:00 Noon)Riding Cart $7.U0/pcr League Rates Monday thru Friday $8.50 - Weekday Rates: 1st Nine $5.00 Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old)2nd Nine $3.00 Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekday s Sr. & Jr.$3.00 1st Nine Holes $5.00 Riding Cart $5.(K>/per 25 i PtJBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.)PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICESStreet or Traffic Signs (sale includes installation) Driveway Culverts (sale only, not installed) Water Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Temporary No Parking Signs (with lath) $ 75.00/std. sign On Quote Basis $ 1.00 each Driveway/Corb-Cut Permits Individual Driveways $ 30.00/permit New Street Intersections (See zoning section • Special improvement Fees) SECTION 2. This ordinance establishing the 1996 Fee Schedule sliall be published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and shall be effective the week of January 1, 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this , 1995. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Summary ordinance published in the Laker/Pioncer newspaper the week of k*: it CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SEPTIC SYSTEM UPGRADE AGREEMENT FOR (Property Owner's Name) (Address) THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this dav of , by and bemeen the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and , their heirs. successors and assigns, (hereinafter called "Property Owner"). WITNESSETH: W'HEREAS, the Property 0\%-ner is the ovv-ner of certain property and has made application to the City of Orono for a building permit to construct improvements on such real property legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the Property ), and WHERE.AS, the septic system serx ing the property has been determined by the City to be non-conforming; and WHERF.AS, the Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 (C) requires that "a non-confomiing sewage treatment system as defined in Section 12.30 and located within the Shoreland 0\erlay District must be upgraded and made conforming, at a minimum, at any time a permit or \ariance of any type is required for any improvement on, or use of, the propcrt>'. Further, the non-conforming sewage treatment system provisions of Section 12.30 shall apply to all shoreland areas"; and WHEREAS, the Property is within the Shoreland Oveday District; and W HEREAS, the Property Owner desires to obtain a permi; for improvements to the Property at this time but due to weather constraints cannot complete the required septic system upgrade until the 1996 construction year; and Initials of Property Owner Initials '>f City Clerk Page 1 of 7 T ri~<i ^ * I # / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CIL MEETING NOV 2 7 1995 .TE: Now^r 22!^^®DATE: ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Adnunistrator Item Description: Administrafor Reviewed:uninist Agenda Section: Adminis trator ’s Report Fire Service Contract with City of Long Lake The city of Long Lake has provided the 1996-1998 fire service agreement to the cities of Medina and Orono for approval. The cost allocation among the cities over the past three years is shown in the table below. The cost allocation formula is based on market value of the property in the fire district for each city, and the number of fire call hours provided to each city. The formula factors are updated each year. FIRE COST ALLOCATION AMONG CITIES Orono Lone Lake Medina 1994 72.73%19.4%7.87% 1995 71.12%20.81%8.07% 1996 70.79%20.89%8.32% COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the 1996-1998 Long Lake Fire Services Agreement. ■f AREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: November 22.‘19W ITEM NO: %D' >S9S Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: yiu Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Police Service Contracts with the Cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach The cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach have each approved the contract for police services for the year 1996. The cost allocation among the cities for the past five years is shown on the table below. The cost allocation formula is based on population and market value of all property in each of the cities. In recent years these two factors have been increasing more in Orono than in the other cities. This will continue as Orono continues to develop housing in its rural area. POLICE COST ALLOCATION AMONG CITIES ORONO LONG LAKE MTKA BEACH SPRING PARK 1992 50.96%18.78%5.48%24.78% 1993 52.071%18.07%5.41%24.45% 1994 51.91%18.53%5.10%24.47% 1995 52.47%18.57%5.0%24.0% 1996 52.91%18.31%4.89%23.89% COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve the 1996 police service contracts with the cities of Spring Turk and Minnetonka Beach. CO!JIVCH r- ^OV ^7REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION - r DATE: November 20, 1995 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Admmistraior Item Description: Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Administrator Revie^^^ed:m__Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Federal regulations mandating a drug and alcohol testing program, for all employees required to have a commercial drivers license in the public sector, were published in February of 1994. These regulations require implementation on January 1. 1995 for large employers (50 or more drivers) and January 1, 1996 for all other employers. For Orono. those employees covered by this regulation are the city ’s Public Works maintenance workers. Because the city has less than 50 employees who are required to have a commercial drivers license, we are required to be in compliance with the Federal requirement as ot January' 1, 1996. Federal law requires that cities develop a drug and alcohol testing policy; and that employers provide information to employees on drug and alcohol misuse, the employer s policy, the testing requirements, and how and where employees can get help. All supervisors of these employees must attend at least one hour of training on the signs and symptoms of drug abuse, and one hour of training on alcohol misuse symptoms and indicators used in making determinations for reasonable suspicion testing. Public entities arc required to use a Federally certified lab for conducting any drug specimen analvsis. The new requirements for record keeping are extensive and significant documentation is required throughout the testing process. Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Orono has panicipated with two groups of cities in developing a drug and alcohol testing policy that meets the requirements of the federal mandate. The policy is attached for Council review and approval. The federal mandate requires drug and alcohol testing under five different sets of circumstances. 1. 3. 4. 5. Pre-employment - during the selection process Reasonable suspicion. Post accident. Remm to duty and follow up testing. Random testing. Kflir 1 i, Requc^ for Coimcfl Action Continued page 2 of 2 NoTember 20, 1995 Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Each of these sets of circumstances is more clearly defined in the proposed drug and alcohol testing policy. Staff Recommendation It is staffs recommendation tha t the attached drug and alcohol testing policy be approved. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the attached drug and alcohol testing policy. t I ’ tm - t ariBivii CITY OF ORONO TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS Pagm Acknowledgment of Receipt of Policy and Related Information Alcohol and Controlled Substances Contact Person Circumstances Under Which Drug/Alcohol Tests Shall be Required or During the Application Process Reasonable Suspicion Post-Accident Return-to-Duty Testing Follow-up Testing Random Testing Confidentiality of Test Results Consequences to Employees Engaging In Prohibited Conduct Coverage Definitions: Accident Alcohol Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT) Confirmation (Confirmatory) test Controlled substance Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) Drug Evidential Breath Testing device (EBT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Medical Review Officer (MRO) Random selection Reasonable suspicion Refuse to submit Safety-sensitive function Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) Discipline Drug and Alcohol Testing Effects of Drugs (Appendix A) Employee/Applicant Rights Licensed Testing Laboratory Other Alcohol Related Conduct Policy Modification Policy and Rules Prohibited Drug and Alcohol Related Conduct Refusal to Undergo Testing and Consequences of Refusal 111795 3 Requested 5 5 6 6 6 6 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 11 7 14 10 8 10 1 8 CITY OF ORONO TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT The abuse of drugs and alcohol is a nationwide problem which affects persons of ever>' age, race and gender. The City of Orono recognizes that work performance and safety problems are created when employees use or abuse illegal drugs and/or alcohol. The City of Orono wishes to provide a safe work place for its employees and to maintain a drug and alcohol free work place. The City of Orono has established the following policy on drugs and alcohol with drug and alcohol testing provisions mandated by the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. POLICY AND RULES A. All employees are strictly prohibited from using, possessing, selling, transferring, or being under the influence of drugs or alcuhol while working or performing job duties or while on the City of Orono premises or while operating the City of Orono’s vehicles, machinery or equipment. "Drugs” are defined as any controlled substance. B. No employee shall perform safety-sensitive functions within four hours after using alcohol. C. No employee shall report for duty or remain On Duty when he or she uses any Controlled Substances, except when the use is pursuant to the instruction of a physician who has advised the employee that the substance does not adversely affect the employee's ability to safely operate a commercial motor vehicle. D. Any employee using a prescription drug which could potentially affect safety or the employee’s performance must immediately notify his or her supervisor of the drug the employee is taking, the name and address of the doctor prescribing the drug, and length of time the employee will be taking the drug. The supervisor will immediately notify the MRO. When in the MRO’s opinion, after consultation with the prescribing physician, the employee’s use of the drug will impair the employee’s job performance or will create a threat to the safety of the employee or others, the employee will be deemed medically unqualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle. The City will work with the employee to determine if there is a suitable temporary job alternative. E. No employee shall report for or remain On Duty if the employee tests Positive for Controlled Substances. TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued F. The distribution or sale of Drugs including, making arrangements during working time or on City property for the sale, purchase, or transfer of Drugs is strictly prohibited, even if the actual sale, purchase, or transfer of Drugs occurs during non-working time or off City property. G. All employees must notify the City Administrator of any criminal drug statute Conviction for a drug law violation occurring in the workplace. The notice must be given to the City no later than five (5) days after the Conviction. H. Any employee found to be in violation of this polic / is subject to discipline up to and including termination of employment. COYTRAGE The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act require that all employees whose Job duties include operating a commercial motor vehicle and who are required to hold a commercial driver ’s license shall be subject to drug and alcohol testing. "Commercial Motor Vehicle" (CMV) means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle meets any one of the following criteria. A. Has a gross combination rating of 26,001 or more pounds inclusive of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating of more that 10,000 pounds; or B. Has a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds; or C. Designed to transport 16 or more passengers including the driver; or D. Is of anv size and is used in the transportation of materials found to be hazardous for the purposes of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and which require the motor vehicle to be placarded. All applicants, including persons currently employed the City of Orono, that apply for a position where job duties include operating commercial motor vehicles will be required to take a drug and alcohol test if a job otfer is made. DEFINITIONS 1.Accident means an occurrence involving a CMV operating on a public road which results in: TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. a) A fatality; or b) Bodily injury to a person who, as a result of the injury, immediately receives medical treatment away from the scene of the accident; or c) One or more motor vehicles incurring disabling damage as a result of the accident, requiring the vehicle to be transported away from the scene by a tow truck or other vehicle. Alcohol means the intoxicating agent in beverage alcohol, ethyl alcohol or other low molecular weight alcohol including methyl or isopropyl alcohol. Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT) means an individual who instructs and assists individuals in the alcohol testing process and operates an EBT. Confirmation (or Confirmatory) test. In drug testing, a second analytical procedure to identify the presence of a specific drug or metabolite that is independent of the screening test and that uses a different technique and chemical principal from that of the screening test in order to ensure rc.lability and accuracy. (Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the only authorized confirmation method for cocaine, marijuana, opiates, amphetamines, and phencyclidine.) In alcohol testing, a second test, following a screening test with a result of 0.02 or greater, that provides quantitative data of alcohol concentration. Controlled substance has the meaning assigned by 21 U.S.C. 802 and includes all substances listed on Schedules 1-5 as they may be revised from time to time (21 C.F.R. Part 1308). DHHS. The Department of Health and Human Services or any designee of the secretary. Department of Health and Human Services. Drug means any substance (other than alcohol) that is a controlled substance as defined in this section and 49 C.F.R. Part 40. Evidential breath testing device (EBT) means an EBT approved by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSA) for the evidential testing of breath. 9. FHWA. The Federal Highway Administration. TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued 10. Medical Review Officer (MRO) means a licensed physician responsible for receiving laboratory results generated by an employer s drug testing program who has knowledge of substance abuse disorder^ and has appropriate medical training to interpret and evaluate an individual's confirmed positive test result together with his or her medical history and any other relevant biomedical information. 11 . Random selection means a mechanism for selection of employees for testing where each employee has an equal chance of being tested each time selections are made. 12. Reasonable suspicion means that the City of Orono believes the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of any employee are indicative of the use of a controlled substance or alcohol based on the observation of a least one (1) supervisor or official who has received training in the identification of behaviors indicative of drug and alcohol use. 13. Refuse to submit (to an alcohol or controlled substance test) means that an employee: a) Fails to provide adequate breath for testing without a valid medical explanation after he or she has received notice of the requirement for breath testing; b) Fails to provide adequate urine for controlled substances testing without a valid medical explanation after he or she has received notice of the requirement for urine testing; or c) Engages in conduct that clearly obstructs the testing process. 14. Safety-sensitive function means all time from the time a driver begins to work or is required to be in readiness to work until the time he/she is relieved from work and all responsibility for performing work and includes the following: (1) All time at a carrier or shipper plant, terminal, facility, or other property, or on any public property, waiting to be dispatched, unless the driver has been relieved from duty by the motor carrier; (2) All time inspecting equipment as required by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, or otherwise inspecting, servicing, or conditioning a CMV at any time: (3) All time spent at the driving controls of a CMV; TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued All time, other than driving time, in or upon any CMV except time spent resting in a sleeper berth; All time loading or unloading a vehicle, supervising, or assisting in the loading or unloading, attending a vehicle being loaded or unloaded, remaining in readiness to operate the vehicle, or in giving or receiving receipts for shipments loaded or unloaded: All time spent performing the drive requirements on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations relating to accidents; All time repairing, obtaining assistance, or remaining in attendance upon a disabled vehicle; 15.Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) means a licensed physician or a licensed or certified psychologist, social worker, employee assistance professional, or addiction counselor (certified by the National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors Certification Commission) with knowledge of and clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of alcohol and contiolled substances-related disorders. CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTS SHALL BE REQUIRED OR REQUESTED DURLNG THE APPLICATION PROCESS. All job applicants, including persons currently employed by the City of Orono, applying for a job where duties include operating the City of Orono CMV’s are required to undergo testing for alcohol and drugs if a Job offer is made. The job offer is contingent upon a negative drug and alcohol test report and the applicant’s written acreement authorizing former employ ers to release to the City of Orono all information on the applicant’s alcohol tests with a concentration result of 0.04 or greater, positive controlled substances test results, and refusals to be tested, within the preceding two years. REASONABLE SUSPICION. A drug test shall be required if the City of Orono has a reasonable suspicion that an employee has violated the provisions of this policy regarding alcohol or controlled substances. Reasonable suspicion alcohol tests should be administered as soon as practicable. If the test is not administered within 2 hours, the reason shall be documented. If the alcohol test is not administered within 8 hours all attempts to conduct the test shall cease and the reasons shall be documented. Notwithstanding the absence of a reasonable suspicion alcohol test, the employee shall not be permitted to perform or continue to perform safety- I TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued sensitive functions until twenty-four hours have elapsed following the determination of reasonable suspicion. POST-ACCIDENT. A post-accident alcohol and drug test is required if an employee operating a CMV is involved in an accident, as ucfined in this policy, that results in: 1. The death of a person or persons regardless of the amount of vehicle or property damage; or 2. The employee receives a citation for a moving traffic violation arising from the accident. The employee must provide an alcohol test sample as soon as practicable alter the occurrence of the accident. If the employee does not receive the test within 2 hours of the accident, the reasons shall be documented. After 8 hours, all attempts to conduct the alcohol test shall cease and the reasons shall be documented. The employee must provide a urine sample tor controlled substances testing as soon as practicable alter the accident. After 32 hours, all attempts to conduct the test shall cease and the reasons shall be documented. An employee subject to post accident testing must remain available or the employee shall be considered to have reliised to submit to testing. The employee is prohibited from using alcohol for 8 hours following the accident or until the employee has undergone a post-accident alcohol test, whichever comes first. RETURN-TO-DUTY TESTING. An employee found to have violated this policy shall not return to work until after undergoing retum-to-duty tests indicating an alcohol concentration of less than 0.02 and a verified negative result from controlled substances. FOLLOW-LT TESTING. Following a detennination by a SAP that an employee is in need of assistance in resolving problems with alcohol abuse and/or controlled substances use, an emplovee shall be subject to unannounced follow-up alcohol and/or controlled substances testing as directed by the SAP. Follow-up testing shall not exceed 60 months from the date of the employee ’s return to duty. RANDOM TESTING. The City of Orono will randomly select employees subject to this policy for unannounced alcohol and controlled substances testing using . computer based random number generator that is matched with an employees identifying number. Alcohol testing shall be performed just before, during or after an employee ’s performance of safety-sensitive duties. Employees selected for testing must proceed immediately to the testing site; provided, however, that if an emplovee is performing a safety-sensitive function at the time of notification, the emplovee shall cease performing the safety-sensitive function and proceed to the testing site as soon as possible FHWA rules require the City of Orono to conduct random controlled TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued substances testing on 50% of the average number of employees and random alcohol testing on 25% of the average number of employees. Employees may be selected for more than one test per year. Tests shall be spread reasonably throughout the year. DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING Controlled substances testing is conducted by analyzing an employee’s urine specimen. Split urine samples will be collected according to FHWA regulations. The employee will provide a urine sample at a desienated collection site. The collection site person shall pour the urine specimen into two bottles labeled "primary" and "split", seal the si^imens, complete a chain of custody document and prepare the bottles for shipment to the testing laboratory' for analysis. If the employee is unable to provide the appropriate quantity of urine, the collection site person shall instruct the employee to drink not more than 24 ounces of fluids and, after a period ot no more than two hours, again attempt to provide a complete sample. If the employee is still unable to provide a complete sample, the testing shall be discontinued and the City of Orono notified. The MRO shall refer the employee for a medical evaluation to determine if the employee’s inability to provide a specimen is genuine or constitutes a refusal to test. For pre employment testing, the City of Orono may elect to not have the referral made and revoke the employment offer. Drue test results are reported directly to the MRO by the testing laboratory. The MRO reports the results to the City of Orono designed contract person. If the results ^ negative, the City of Orono is informed and no further action is necessary. If the test result is confirmed positive, the MRO shall give the employee an opportunity to discuss the test result. The MRO must review any medical records supplied by an employee to determine if a confirmed positive test is the result of the employee having taken legally prescribed medication. The MRO shall notify each employee that the employee has 72 hours in which to request a test of the split specimen at the employee's expense. The MRO will contact the employee directly, on a confidential basis, to determine whether the person wishes to discuss the positive test result. The MRO will review the confirmed positive test result to determine whether there is an acceptable medical reason for the positive result. The MRO shall verify and report a positive test result to the City of Orono when there is no legitimate medical reason for a positive test result as received from the testing laboratory. If after making reasonable efforts and documenting these efforts, the MRO is unable to reach the employee directly, the MRO must contact the designated City of Orono contact person, who sh ill direct the employee to contact the MRO. If the City of Orono contact person is unable to TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPL0\T:E TESTING ACT Continued contact the employee, the employee will be placed on suspension. The MRO may verify a test positive without having communicated directly with the employee about the test results under the following circumstairces: 1. The employee expressly declines the oppimunity to discuss the lest results. 2. The employee has not contacted the MRO within five days of being instructed to do so by the City of Orono. The FHWA alcohol test rules require breath testing administered by a BAT using an EBT. Two breath tests are required to determine if a person has a prohibited alcohol concentration. Any result less than 0.02 alcohol concentration is considered a ’’negative" test. It the alcohol concentration is 0.02 or greater, a second confirmation test must be conducted. It an employee attempts and fails to provide an adequate amount of breath, the City ot Orono will direct the employee to obtain w'ritten evaluation from a licensed physician to determine if the employee s inability to provide a specimen is genuine or constitutes a retusal to test. Alcohol test results are reported directly to the designated City of Orono contact person. LICENSED TESTING LABORATORY The testing laboratory shall be name of company, street address, city, state, zip ctxle, pho ng number, vvhich is a lab certified to perform controlled substance testing according to DHHS regulations. PROHIBITED DRUG AND ALCOHOL RELATED CONDUCT The following alcohol and controlled substance-related activities are prohibited by the FHWA’S drue and alcohol rules for drivers ot C.MV's: 1. Reporting for duty or remaining on duty to perform safety-sensitive functions while having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater; 2. Bein2 on duty or operating a CMV while the employee possesses alcohol, unless the alcohol is manifested and transported as a part of a shipment. This includes the possession of medicines containing alcohol (prescription or over-the-counter), unless the packaging seal is unbroken; 3. Using alcohol while performing safety-sensitive functions; 8 TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY’ UNDER the omnibus TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Contimtd 4. 5. Performing safety-sensiti\e functions within four hours after using alcohol; When retjulred to take a post-accident test, using alcohol within eight hours following the accident or prior to undergoing a post-accident alcohol test, whichever comes first; 6.Refusing to submit to an alcohol or controlled substance test required by post accident, random, reasonable suspicion, or follow-up testing requirements; 7.Reporting for duty or remaining on duty, requiring the performance of safety- sensitive functions, when the driver uses any controlled substance, except when instructed by a physician who has advised the driver that the substance does not adversely affect the driver’s ability to sately operate a CMV; 8.Reporting for duty, remaining on duty or performing a safety-sensitive function, if the driver tests positive for controlled substances. CONSEQUENCES TO EMPLOYEES ENGAGING IN PROHIBITED CONDUCT Employees who have engaged in prohibited conduct are subject to the following consequences pursuant to FHWA rules: 1 . Employees shall not be permitted to perform safety-sensitive functions; 2.Employees shall be advised by the City of Orono of the resources available to them in evaluating and resolving problems associated with misuse of alcohol or use of controlled substances; 3.Employees shall be evaluated by a substance abuse professional who shall determine what assistance, if any, the employee needs in resolving problems associated with alcohol misuse and/or controlled substance use; 4.Before an employee remms to duty requiring performance of a safety-sensitive function, he/she shall undergo a retum-to-duty test with a result indicating a breath alcohol level of less than 0.02 if the conduct involved alcohol, or a controlled substance test with a verified negative result if the conduct involved controlled substance use; 5. In addition, each employee identified as needing assistance in resolving problems 1 * • - TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued associated with alcohol or controlled substances shall be evaluated by a substance abuse professional to determine that the employee has followed the rehabilitation program prescribed; 6. Tte employee shall also be subject to unarmounced follow-up alcohol and controlled subsunce testing. OTHER ALCOHOL RELATED CONDUCT FHWA rules require that in the event of an alcohol test result over 0.02 but less than 0.04. an employee shall not be permitted to perform safety-sensitive functions for not less than 24 hours. REFUSAL TO UNDERGO TESTING AND CONSEQUENCES OF REFUSAL All applicants and employees have the right to refuse to undergo drug and alcohol testing. If an individual refuses to undergo drug and alcohol testing required by this policy, no such test shall be given. An applicant who refuses to take a drug and alcohol test shall be disqualified from further consideration for the coiKiitionally offered position. An employee refusing to take a drug and alcohol test required by this policy shall not be permitted to perform safety-sensitive functions and will be considered insubordinate and will be subject to disciplinary action including possible dismissal. EMPLOYEE/APPLICANT RIGHTS All applicants and employees subject to the drug testing provisions of this policy have the right to request, at employee or applicant expense, a retest of the split urine sample within 72 hours of receiving notice of a confirmed positive test result. If the employee requests an analysis of the split specimen within seventy-two (72) hours of having been informed of a verified positive test, the MRO shall direct, in writing, the laboratory to provide the split specimen to another DHHS-certified laboratory for analysis. If an employee has not contacted the MRO within seventy-two (72) hours, the employee may present to the MRO information documenting that serious illness, injury, inability to contact the MRO, lack of actual notice of the verified positive test, or other circumstances unavoidably prevented the employee from timely making contact. If the MRO concludes that there is a legitimate explanation for the employee ’s failure to contact within seventy-two (72) hours, the MRO shall TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER the omnibus TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued direct the analysis of the split specimen. If the confirming tetest is negative, no adverse action will be taken against the employee and an applicant will be considered for employment. The employer will not discharge an employee that, for the first time, receives a verified positive drug or alcohol test result unless: 1. The employee refuses to meet with a substance abuse professional for the purpose of an evaluation for alcohol/controlled substance use/abuse and recommendations for an educational, counseling or treatment program; or 2. the employee fails to enter the recommended program, or fails to successfully complete the program; or 3. the employee fails a retum*to-duty alcohol and controlled substance test at the successful completion of the recommended program or subsequent unannounced follow-up alcohol and controlled substance testing. DISCIPLINE Any person found to be in violation of this policy is subject to discipline up to and including discharge. Disciplinary actions taken pursuant to this policy are appealable pursuant to the procedures established in the Employer’s personnel policy and rules or any applicable collective bargaining agreement, but not both. Nothing in this policy limits or restricts the right of the City of Orono to discipline or discharge an employee for conduct which violates the City of Orono policies or rules provided the employee is not tested for controlled substances or alcohol. CONFIDENTIALITY OF TEST RESULTS All alcohol/controlled substances test results and required records are considered confidential information. Any information concerning an individual ’s test results and records shall not be released without the written permission of the individual except as provided for by regulation or law. TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY UNDER THE OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE TESTING ACT Continued ALCOHOL AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES CONTACT PERSON The City of Orono designated contact person will coordinate the implementation, direction, and administration of the City of Orono ’s alcohol and controlled substances policy. The contact person is the principal contact for the collection site, the testing lab, the MRO, the BAT and the person tested. Employee questions concerning this policy should be directed to the contact person. The designated contact person is: Name: Position: Phone: POLICY MODIFICATION The City of Orono retains the right to modify this policy to conform to changes in regulation or law. t'- ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF POLICY AND RELATED INFORMATION I have received a copy of the Transportation Employee Drug and Alcohol Policy and have been provided information on the following; 1. The person designated by the City of Orono to answer questions about these materials; 2. Who is subject to alcohol misuse and controlled substance requirements; 3. Explanation of a safety-sensitive function; 4. What driver conduct is prohibited; 5. Circumstances for drug and/or alcohol testing; 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Procedures used to test for the presence of drugs and/or alcohol; The requirement that employees submit to controlled substance and alcohol testing; An explanation of what constitutes a refusal to submit to testing; The consequences for drivers violating the prohibitions of this rule, including the immediate removal of the driver from safety-sensitive functions; The consequences for drivers found to have an alcohol concentration level of 0.02 or greater, but less than 0.04; and Information concerning the effects of alcohol and controlled substances use on an individual’s health, work, and personal life. Signs and symptoms of an alcohol or controlled substances problem and available methods of intervening when an alcohol or a controlled substances problem is suspected, including confrontation, referral to an employee assistance program, and/or referral to management. Sicnamre:Date; Please print name; 0«J«V5 1 C:’Ji%CilMEEnNG REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 7 1995 DATE; ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse linistrator Reviewed: e y; Title City Administrator Item Description: City Administrator Salary Adjustment Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report The City Council met in a work session on Tuesday, November 21, 1995 for the purpose of evaluating the performance of the City Administrator and determining a commensurate salary adjustment. Through the evaluation process, the Council determined the performance of the City Administrator to be satisfactory. The Council also agreed that the salary of the City Administrator is 10 be increased to $66,982 effective 1/1/95, and increased to $68,890 effective 1/1/%. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the adjustment of the City Administrator’s salary to $66,982 effective 1/1/95 and to $68,890 effective 1/1/96. li COUNCIL MEEn:J& REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 7 1995 CITYOFORONO DATE: November 21, 1995 ITEM NO: / y- DepaiUnrat Approval:Administrator Reviewed: Name Dorothy Halim THk City Clerk Item Description: RENEWAL OFF SALE Navarre Liquors Inc. LIQUOR Steve Cori 3421 Shoreline Drive RENEWAL ON SALE LIQUOR Jimmie’s Lounge Jimmie Holtz 3380 Shoreline Drive RENEWAL CLUB LICENSE WcKxihill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Wavzata Countrv Club, Inc 200 Wavzata Boulevard COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses. Agenda Section: LicrnsM i Date: To: From: Subject: Hovenber 13, 1995 Ren Moorse, City Administrator Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application of Mr. John Downey on behalf of the Wayzata Country Club for renewal of the liquor license. After conducting background investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. / Liouoa cxvrnKx. oivisiom . 444 ST-SUITC 100 L C S«fctV ST PAUL rii $5101-215* SION ST. PAW. m MN 55101 toi^)^viM>4J0 i'lY(612)282^^555 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE LIgmMAi Please verify your license informatioo contained below Make corrections if necessary and ^8^- l^ty Clerk/Conatv Auditor sh^ submit this signed renewal with completed license and Ucensee Uqiror for the new license penod. Chy Oerk/Cormfy Auditor are also required by MA W0A.404 S. 3 fo report any Ucense License Code.MCLONSS Period Endme 12/31/95 p «-----LL9S o^ao. CO 100.00 City/County where license appnned Or Ono Licensee Name Wayzata Country Club Inc. Trade Name wayzata Country Club Licensed Location address 200 Wayz aza Blvd/Box 151 City. State.Zip Code Orono, MN 55 391 Business Phone (612) 473-3346 1.ICF.NSE FEES; Off Sale $ On Sale S 300.00 Sunday $ Bv signint this renewal application. appUcant certifies that there has been no change in ownership, corporate ofliem, partn^home addresses. Of telephone numbers, ifehanees base occurred dimng the past 12 months, please give details OQ the back of this renewal, then sign below. ApplSranf- on thb renewal confirms the followina; FaUurt tO rtPOlt MT Ilf thC foflgwjag wjfl m«lt la fiB£2t Licensee confirms that it has never had a Uquor Ucense rejected by any city/township/county in the slate of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renews then sign below. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a Uquor Ucense revoked for any liquor law vioUtion (state or local). If a revocauon has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. Licensee confinns that dunng ±e past five years it or its cmplovecs have not been cited for any civil or crm^al Uquor law violaUons If vioUtions have occurred, please gn e details on back of this renewaL dicn si^^low Licen.see conlinns that dunng the past Ucense year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor LiabUity Law (Dram .Shop) MS 340A.802. If > es. attach a copy of the summon-s. then sign below, j. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the fuU Ucense penod. Ucensee has attached a Uquor liabiUty insurance certtfkate that corresponds with the license c^/county w here Ucense b bsued. S100.000 in cash or securities or S100.000 surety bond mny be submitted in lieu of Uquor UabiUtv. 1. 2. 3 4. 5 Date / Ol icensee Signature ------------------------^-----j-----^ (Signature certifies aU'ii^c inlormauon to be correct has been approved by atv/county Date Date^ rin- rierlci'Cnunr.- .Auditor Simature------------------------------------------------------------------------------—— ----- (Signature certifies that an on-sale intoxicalmg Uquor Ucense has been approved by the cit>/counl> as stated above). County Attorney SignstUfC_________^------- County Board issued Ucenses only (^^^atiue certifies lu Police-Sheriffgjnir^T- -----------------DuK (Simature certillcs UceiLsee or associates hai^’not beCfi cited dunng the past five years for an.v state/1d(ial vnolalions (cnminal/civTl). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS iioble for U< Iladkatg bdow cha loratg flfliffri. partners, home a i^r Tfi»phone numt Report Mow dftaih of liquor law vinlatioin fcivil or crimman that have occurred withitt the laat fivt* ygara. f Patw. ofleinM. finw or other nfnalties. including Liquor Controlf tnaltltaL Report bflow details involving any license rejections or revocations rifv/rounrv Comments; w Date Hovesiber 13, 1995 To;Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswicic, Chief of Police Sxibject:Liquor License Renewal 1 have reviewed the application of Mr. "“l! the Woodhill Country Club for renewal of the liquor licens . After conducting background investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Li JMl w*grVi* \ . OlViStOH 444 CCOM ST-$UITt lOO L ic Slfcfy ST. PMUL rw 55101-2154 BUM* .MN5510I (612)2‘»6^30 TTY(612)242-6555 RENTO'AL OF LIQUOR, WCSE» OR CLUB LlCtySE % Ej. Please verif> >our licease mfcamitKm coouiscd below tbe new Ckrit/Coonly Auditor sboeld siibaut this wmed n^il >1*1^4.404 S. 3 to report aet Bee.se liccMe pcric^ City ClerkConaty AudHor are also required by >1.^ ^ caaceBatioik License Code.HCLONSS License Pmod Ending ,12/31/95,10 i 391 City/CosBty where license approved 0r ono Lkens«Naine Woodhill Country Club Trade Name Licensed Locatioo address 200 Woodhill Rd Orono, MN 55391 Cilv, Stale, Zip Code (612) 473-7333 Business Phone On Sale $ 100.00 Sunday S l.lf yVf;F FEES: Off Sale S ---------- on the back ot this renew aL then sign below . O, ------------ Finn I. nti»it .nT iSttf f«ll»wl.i -nil myltJ» r**" Uca«. ««nnDs aul illu.h«i . Uquor licnL«nsj=ct«db* u; ““ 2. Lic»«coonn^Uu.for a«p... »«»>»l»» (sutc or local) If a rrvocaUoo has ou: p ^_lovae< have not been cited for any civil or cnminal 3. Licensee coafmns that P“‘ a^ e'details on back of this renewal then sign below. uT,^^d.‘sX(I)S •“ UabiUty. . . . y ^Y{\ ,X- ______________________________ all above ini-^aiion to be correct and Ucense has been approved by citj/county. Pels.L/aic_________ - ”,ox.c.,-; ..qu,. b.. .pp^o. by co-wv .. »u.«. .bo^ a;' ^tXuZcs ^ b^bpb^ _ X _____Date au™;*. p.:q n^. >.«. fo. «.y ^.=,locH.q«,».* vioUuons (cnminal/ciMl). Report Moianoos on back, then sign here. PS 9093-94 rI t b ‘ Indicate below rh^nfgi at forporat^ offTiffw. partngr^. home addrwstt or tclephongLjnunib^ra: ry,; rtr>~\ 4^_fo^S3C_______ Pn , f Jr\ (THcf, ■‘Vy ’c S" yrir tA iCA^hlPFiA^r^. '. 4^^-ir^e.i below det ails of liquor law violatiom (civil or criminaH that have occurred within thf last five years. (Dates. ofTemea. fine^ or other penalties, inclndiny Liquor Control Pfnaltif»il- Report below details involving any license rejections or revoeationi. City/County Comments: , I'J, ■'■1 Date: To: From: Subject: Hovember 13, 199S Ron Moorse, City Administrator Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal I hava raviewed the application of the Navarre Liquor for renewal of the liquor license. After conducting background investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. K r UOX» OOfTSOU OIVISIOM ^ 444 aSMI ST-SUITC 100 1. sr. MMA. r« SS101-21SS :k>N 55101 (612)296-6430 TTY(612)2S2*6555 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLl^ LICENSE Uamc. PW v«n^ yo, Monn^ Code____OI^SL . »:«« Pcnod Eod,, _»2/3V95_lP »------Bil Cin/Coonty where license approved Or ono Licensee Name Navarr# Liquors Inc Trade Name Liceosed Location address 3421 Shoreline Dr Navarre, MN 55392 On Sale S Sunday S CiW. Slate. Zip Code (612) 471-8800 Business Phone 150.00 I.ICINSE FE£Si OffSaleS on the back of this renewal then sign below . .I...,-. - .I.I—...1 cc nmii Ihf folb-lai; ruhrr'»imit wr iifllit Mfmm -M m«ltJo (state or dunne the oast five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or crunina Uability. —-------( ^ ^ ^ ____________________Date itave^bm,ruoo to b. toiSCi md l.^li£-t««. .pproved by cly/comily. __________________P«te__________ ---o. uc^ e.. .pp,.ve. b>- cn/^.) ^ Pf^^nty An^nir'' Signature Date County Board is.sued licenses only (Si^ature certifies i 1__IT r dianfM af it» offnifpartiiOT. home t or trf^phone Biimbgn! Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or crimmah that havg occurred within the last five veora. f Datw. offenses, fines or other penalties* ineludin^ Liquor ControLPcnaiticsL Report below details involving any license rejections or revocations. Citv/County Comments: • • Date: To: From: Subject November 13r 1995 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Gary CheswicJc, chief of Police Liquor license Renewal ST. P0O. m 55I01-215« *IN 55101 (612)296-6430 TTY(6l2K»^-6555 m RENEWAL OF LIQUOR. WINE, OR CLl^ LICENSE LktiuMi Please ven^ voor Ikeise informatiaii contaBcd below. Make correctioiis tf neoessap aad sicn. Oi> CkA/Comiy Auditor sh^ submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor babdit> for the new license period. City CerWCounty AudHor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancePatloD. License Code.ONSS Lic«ss Pniod Brim. i:/31./9S ID #----3m Cily/Comty where license apprmed 0r o no LicenseeName Jitwnie ’s Inc. Trade Name Jimmin ’s Lounge LicensedLocatioaaddress 3380 Shoreline Dr/3ox 36 Citj. State. Zip Code Navarre, MN 55 392 Business Phone (612) 471-7666 I iCFNSE FEES; Off Sale S On Sales 4,000.00 Sunday S 200.00 Bv signing this renewal appUcation. applicant cemfies that there has been no change in owne^p. <^rpwtc office^ pamSThome addresses, or telephone numbers. If changes have occurred during the past U months, please give detaiL> on the back of this renewal then sign below. Applir.nrs Signature on this renewal conflrma thf fpUtfwing; FttUttrt ttt rtPim 4nv 9f lilt f9ih>wiBt ^Ul my llifl fines. 2. Licensee confirms that it ha.s never had a liquor Ucense rejected by any city /towiLship/county m the slate of Minnesota. Ifeverrejectei please give details on the back of this renewal then sign below Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a Uquor license revoked for any liquor Uw violation (sute or local) If a rev ocauon has occurred, please giv e details on the back of this renewal, then si^ below. 3 Licensee confirms that during the past fiv e y ears it or its employ ees have not been cited for any civil or c^al bquor Uw violations. If violations have occurred, plexse giv e details on back of this rraevval then sign below 4 Licensee confirms that dunna the past Ucense vear. a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full Ucense period. Licensee has attached a Uquor Uabiiity iniurmnce certificate that corresponds with the where Ucense is bsued. S 100,000 in cash or securities or 51004)00 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of Uquor liability. correct and Ucense has been approved by city/county-. (sl^^mre Smfiw Aat'm Jn^'l^toxicating Uquor license has been approved by the city/<»unty as Staled above)? (^'ntiruv Attnniev Signature DateCOUnrv >\norncY ----------------------------^ County Board issued licenses only (Signiture certifies Ucensee is dinMe for .' / " Hate f 1^!Pr.lice/Shenff Signature-----------J " ■ oertTbeen cited during 3 oack. then sien hereviolations (cnminal'civiJ). Report violations on PS 9093-94 i IIndkaig below nt r ite ofliceru parhiew. hon *^ addrwstt or tdeohttiic numben; Report below details of liquor taw violations fcivil or criminah that have Otcurrcd last five years. (Pates. ofTenses. fines or other pen alties, including Liauor Control PenaltiwK 7~ ft'i/AJo/L. ^/^o u’^"^ ^ccc’y fh/c£ tl-l? - *fc> SotJ LcP^ Report below details involving anv license rejections or revocations. _________________aJo '3 _________________ City/Countv Comments: I I 3 o f til nwsfftm tM 9:M m dt«k OMck ■natter C<ty «4 Orono ^Giployct m 040^ 040284 CALLANAN JA., EOWAAO J. TouU Otcck ftflCar 040^ 04028S 04028S OOfTTEN. J. OIANN Toial* Chack IUBi»r 04Q2tf 0Mck Nuiear 040286 040286 HJRS, JOEUCN L. Totals Otack HuriMr 040286 Chack Nunber 040287 040287 JABBOUt, GABRIEL Totals Chack Ruibcr 040287 ;hcck NiMber 0402S8 040288 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Chock Htariaer 040288 Check Ntabar 040339 040339 BOSMA. JAMIE L. Totals Check Nkober 040339 Check Nuiber 040340 040340 HALLIH, DOROTHY M. Totals Check Hiober 040340 Check Nusber 040341 040341 HASEMAH, CAROLE A Totals Check Munber 040341 Check Muiber 040342 040342 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Hutber 040342 Check Date 13no«-98 13-NOV-95 13-NOV-95 13-NOV-95 13-NOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-MOV-95 RsBa 1 Check 220.65 220.65 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 247.28 247.28 891.14 891.14 731.33 731.33 1,516.89 1,516.89 mi 9i9tm Omk itflfttr City of Orono Qnclt ioptofio wmm MB43 maa vtc. umi TotiU Qioet mater 04043 r 040344 CMS44 KUEffll, TiKMS N. Totolt Oitek mat^ 040344 04Q34S HIlLfi, CKilSTQPHEI K. Touli Qitct meter 040345 3Mclt meter 040346 0LS», JQf» C. Totals Check mriber 040346 3ieck meter 040347 040347 AHDERSOii, BmJCC 1. Tctsls Check Bute* 040347 Sleek Sinter 040346 040348 BtSZlES, SUE A. Totals Check Sunter 040346 Sieck meter 040349 040349 BOfUS, SCOTT U. Totals Check Sinter 040349 Check Sinter 040330 040350 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Nimbcr 040350 Check Sinter 040351 040351 CHESUICK, GARY B Totals Check meter 040351 Check Sunter 04035Z Oiect Date 22-ite-95 :2-Sov-95 22-NOV-95 22NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-MOV-95 rate 2 Check Amount 715.96 715.96 1,223.31 1,223.31 623.11 623.11 730.54 730.54 365.95 365.95 630.60 630.80 623.47 823.47 431.59 431.59 1,259.34 1,259.34 *'■ ■ II - t ■ .r»n» ! Ifv Ifff ^ f:W m Ch«ckCity •« Or«tt OMck QMOM OOMICX, JMfS L Totatt Owck 0403S2 040353 040353 0e«0USKI. JAT c. ToUlt Check Q4Q353 OMck auiibcr 040354 040354 EMGLISN in. IRVIMG M. Total* Check ftefcer 040354 040355 040355 EtlCKSOH. tClMT Totals Check Bt^r 040355 Sleek MUikier 040356 040356 FISCttfklCH, DAB T, Totals Check Huitier 040356 Check Nuiter 040357 040357 HANSINC, CAROL J Totsls Check HuBtoer 040357 Ch'tck Nuieier 040358 040358 JOHNSON, BRAOLET l>. Totals Check kunber 040358 Check Muiiier 040359 040359 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Nuifcer 040359 Check Number 040360 040360 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Nuiber 040360 Check Hutber 040361 Check Date 22*iew*95 22*iov*95 22-NOV-95 22-«ev-95 22-MOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-N0V-95 22-N0V-95 22-NOV-95 raie 3 Oieck 1,201.36 1,201.36 1.041.U 1,041.14 410.73 410.73 1,036.90 1,036.90 999.66 999.66 312.37 312.37 1,087.28 1,087.28 520.67 520.67 468.53 468.53 1 M ftum Ch«£t tcflsttf city of Orm OiOUl I NOMMCznsn. own Total* Choeic 04036T 0403tt MfiStt mmi. uiutM I. Total* Cliock Nuitor 040362 040363 04063 fCNOEmOFF. joni I. Total* Chock MtMbor 040363 Chock r 040364 040364 TNOMTOi. MAUC I. Total* Chock iiuiter 040364 Chock r 04036S 040365 TOMCHECi:, LAURENCE F. Total* Check Nukber 040365 Chock r 040366 040366 TQMCZYiC, HARK U. Totals Chock Neuter 040366 Chock Neater 040367 040367 FARNIOK, CORRET L. Totals Chock Neuter 040367 Chock Neuter 040368 040368 nSCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Chock Neuter 040368 Chock Nejiter 040369 040369 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Total* Check Neiter 040369 Qtock Neuter 040370 Chock Oltt 22-I9V95 22-1^95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 8 08* 4 Oiock It T.B9.83 t,239,83 271.10 271.10 823.08 823.08 868.10 868.10 181.17 181.17 1,104.24 1,104.24 202.59 202.59 130.11 130.11 909.25 909.25 P 1 ftm m eb»A OMck k«fi«t«r City «f Orona OUSTO 0UB70 MOUSTM, XMMm k. Tault OMck ftater 04037Q 040371 CMI. LTLE I. Totals ClMck luter 040371 040372 040372 Wa, KUCI L. Totals Cliacic Itaiwr 04Q37Z 040373 040373 UEOCMAN. STE7HEM J. Totals Chock Huter 040373 Chock 040374 040374 •RIMKNAUS, jom r. Totsls Chock Nciiiior 040374 Chock r 040375 040375 GERHA»S(». JOHM t. Totals Chock Nuibcr 040375 Chock r 040376 040376 GREGORY, JAMES 0. Totals Chock Nuaber 040376 Chock Nuiber 040377 040377 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Nuabor 04U377 Check Nviiber 040378 0403^OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G Totals Check Nuaber 040378 heck Muaber 040379 Chock Oato 22-Nov-9f 22-NOV9S 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-98 22-NOV-95 22-NOV95 22-NOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-MOV-95 Mast 3 Chock 1,116.42 1,116.42 1,096.40 1,096.40 913.25 913.25 60.15 60.15 1,023.37 1,023.37 1,279.39 1,279.39 606.39 606.39 680.91 680.91 820.52 820.52 ■ mi I a' k iwrnmi m OMClt tafilttr City cf OHM Chvcti o«tt 0US79 0MS79 onin, IA»T L.22•Haw-95 Tatalt 040S7V Stack 04OM OMOIO 9<UJiK, 6K£Q«T A.22-HOV-95 Totals dtock 040380 040381 040381 RATNMW. 8AA8T J.22-HOV-95 Totala Chock HuHbor 040381 Stock Hunter 040382 040382 SKKEEH, 0AL8 S.22-HOV-95 Totals Chock Htater 040382 Stock Huiter 040383 040383 OETERSOH, JACK U.22-HOV-95 Totals Chock Huter 040383 Stock Huiter 040384 040384 STEFFENHACEN, RONALO E.22-H0V-95 Totals Check Htoter 040384 SronO Total 9o«o 8 Chock It 148.42 148.42 405.41 • ••••• 405.41 1,058.70 1,058.70 710.56 710.56 24.79 24.79 981.50 981.50 35,458.61 Tu> S:2am Cti«k ClMck l«t<st*r City of Ororw 0«t9 Mm 5<BO MClOi Mfn SQ3SS 1«‘M9vfS ANCm kMfl r«c*ls CDffck itoi^ 50383 ancmom paki dMck ftirtar 5<a8« ka /porcmsic sciemcc lm S03M 18-MOV95 KA/FOMENSIC SCIENCE LAS TstSlS OtfCk NU«»r 50384 SCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAS ctack nstiir 50385 iiTumugos soaoways imc . 5030 18-N9V95 SITVJMINOUS SOAOyAYS INC. Tetsts Oifcfc Mij*tr 50385 situminous soaouays inc . Chsek ttJtitr 5Q386 ilackowiak & SON 50386 50386 50386 50386 50386 21-NOV-9S 21*Moy-95 21-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 16-SOV-95 SLACKOWIAK 6 SON SLACKOUIAK 6 SON SLACKOUIAK 6 SON SLACKOUIAK 6 SON SLACKOUIAK t SON Touts Check Nuiter 50386 SLACKOUIAK ( SON Check Rurtier 50387 SUDGET PR I NT INC Check NuYtoer 50389 CITY Of ninnetonka 50389 16-MOV-95 CITY Of MINNETONKA Totals Check Mvj*er 50389 CITY Of NINNETONKA Check Nuiejer 50390 CITY Of ORONO PETTY CASH 50390 16-NOV-95 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Totals Check NcrtM-r 50390 CITY Of ORONO PETTY CASH tion t 637.91 637.91 40.00 40.00 733.99 733.99 70.44 293.89 168.58 150.00 700.94 1.383.85 8,970.00 8,970.00 80.29 80.29 9B0e 1 COPT PAPER IHTCXTUnR COURSE-MCHICN SITCRETE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE FALL CLEANUP FALL CLEANUP 50387 21-Nov-95 BUDGET PBINTING 100.75 OOM. ABUSE FORMS 50387 16-NOV-95 BUDGET PtlNTING 7.39 RETURN FAULTY MONITOR Totals Check Nuiter 50367 BUDGET PBINTING 106.14 Check Musbcr 50388 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 50388 21-NOV-95 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 133.74 #172 ELECT. WORK 5Q388 16-NOV-95 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 40.59 #171 ELEC. UORK 50368 16-NOV-95 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 89.30 #172 OIL CHANGE^UIPERS 50368 16-NOV-95 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 229.02 ilTO TUNE UP Totals Check Nuiter 50388 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 492.65 4TH QTR PROSECUTION REIMS. POLICE PETTY CASH V • 21 mm mi rm 5:2* Ml Ctwcfc d»«ck City of Orono Bott 5(091 cm 09 (MTZATA 5(091 1**IIW-9I cm Of UfTZAT* Totals Ql«k 50391 CtTT Of MYZATA GfMRk 5(092 COlONIAl UFC INSUSASCE CO. 50392 16-ltoy-9S COLONIAL LIFE IN8UNANCE CO. Teuia Check 50392 colonial life instance co. fate 2 Totals Check Nu^r 50396 ESS BAOT hers ( SONS Oteck Nioiier 50397 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 50397 16-Nov-95 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC Totals Check Nuitier 50397 EULL'S manufacturing CO. INC Check Huiiaer 50398 FEED RITE CONTROLS 50398 16-N0V-95 FEED RITE CONTROLS Totals Check Nirter 50398 FEED RITE controls Jieck Nujber 50399 0 t K SERVICES 50399 16-N0V-95 G & K SERVICES Transaction )t 3.705.45 3.705.45 693.52 693.52 74.55 3S0 QTI UATER CHARGES DECEMBER INSURANa ch#cit 50393 COHSELLT llfiUSTilAL ILEC. 5039S 16-lev-95 CONNEUT INDUSTRIAL ELEC.254.63 ALTERNATORS Totals Check Nuiter 50393 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC.254.63 CMck 50394 OEfT Of fUBLIC SAFETY 50394 16-NOV-95 DEPT OF fOiLIC SAFETY 510.00 CONNECTION CHARGES TotAts Ch^k Mugber 50394 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 510.00 '3)«clc iu^ef 50395 EARL F. ANDERSON 1 ASSOC. 5039S 16-N0V-95 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC.305.52 ORONO NOTICE SIGNS 50395 16-NOV-95 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC.69.40 UTILITY DROP BOX SIGN 50395 16-NOV-95 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC.616.87 CHANNEL POSTS Totals Check Mister 50395 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC.991.79 Qieck Nunber 50395 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS 50396 16-M0V-95 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS 74.55 adjustment rings CO. INC.700.02 MANHOLE RINGS CO. INC.700.02 35.00 CONTAINER CHARGE 35.00 8.48 PJtTHmJN S 119V ms OifCt tfflsttr City Ort»%o CMck 50399 50399 50399 50399 Oatt 50399 0 ft K SEtVICES 16-IOV95 6 ft K KtvnSS lft-lov-95 6 ft K S£Ryi» 1ft-lov-95 G ft K SftiVICtS 1ft-lov*95 G ft K SEftVICXS lft-Hov-95 6 ft K UJNIOLS T«ta(9 Chack Watib^r 50399 G ft K SEKVICES 50400 GAXEUCK STUl CO IMC. 50400 U-iov-95 Totals Chock ftuibor GASELIOC STEEL CO INC. 50400 GANEilCK STEEL CO INC. hock Niater 50401 50401 GNEAT UESTEIN SmY CO 16-NOV-95 Totals Qiock Nioter GREAT yESTERi SUPPLY CO 50401 GREAT WESTERN «>PLY CO hock Nioter 50402 50402 50402 GROUP HEALTH INC. 16-Nov-95 16-NOV-95 Totals Chock Nunbor GROUP HEALTH INC. GROUP HEALTH INC. 50402 GROUP HEALTH INC. hock NiNbor 50403 50403 HASEMAN. CAROLE 21-Nov-95 Totals Check Ntnber HASEMAN, CAROLE 50403 MASEHAN, CAROLE hock Number 50404 50404 ITHACA 21-Nov-95 ITHACA Totals Check Nimber 50404 ITHACA heck Nvjnber 50405 50405 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. 16-N0V-95 Totals Check Nuiber J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC, 50405 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. heck Ntinber 50406 50406 JOHNSON, BRAD 16-NOV-95 Totals Check Ntnber JOHNSON, BRAD 50406 JOHNSON, BRAD heck NuRber 50407 LAFAYETTE CLUB tion 51.46 2.64 i.43 84.96 2.64 158.66 93.26 93.26 301.87 301.87 301.00 3.472.24 3.773.24 15.08 15.08 193.70 193.70 30.00 30.00 9.30 9.30 Pa^ 3 STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN RATHBLIN STREET DEPT STEFFENHAGEN SCRAP METAL PUBLIC SAFETY MAGNETS DECEMBER HEALTH INS DECEMBER HEALTH INS REIMS. MILEAGE SLIP PRINTER RIBBONS APPLIANCE PICKUP NEALS REIMS. 50407 16-NOV-95 LAFAYETTE CLUB 2.27 REN. BALANCE 21 Tot S:2«ffl Ctock tcsistiP City of (^oho Onck sr Oato 5<K07 UfATETTE CLUi Touts Chock mater 50407 LAMTETTE CLUO 50408 LANO EQUIPMENT 50408 16-iOV-95 lANO EQUIPMENT Totals Chock mater 50408 UNO EQUIPMENT Chock mater 50409 UNNE'S TIRE SERVICE 50409 16-10V-95 lEMNE'S TIRE SERVICE Totals Chock Kjnber 50409 LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE Oiock mater 50410 MAOONALO LA8ORAT0RIES 50410 16-NOV-95 MACDONALD LA80RAT0RIES Totals Chock mater 50410 MACDONALD LA80RAT0RIES Chock mater 50411 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 50411 16-NOV-95 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Totals Chock Muter 50411 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Chock mater 50412 HCMICHOLS. DAVID 50412 16-NOV-95 MCNICHOLS, DAVID Totals Chock Muter 50412 MCNICHOLS, DAVID Check Nunter 50413 MEOCEHTER HEALTH CARE 50413 16-BOV-95 MEDCEHTER HEALTH CARE Totals Check Nuter 50413 MEDCEHTER HEALTH CARE Check Muter 50414 MIDWEST ASPHALT 50414 50414 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 MIDWEST asphalt MIDWEST asphalt Totals Check Nioter 50414 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Nuter 50415 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 50415 21 -NOV-95 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS Totals Check Nuter 50415 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS Check Ntinber 50416 MINN COMM TrarsKtion imBurd 2.27 195.16 195.16 72.50 72.50 462.99 462.99 57.18 57.18 3.81 3.81 1/756.47 1,756.47 285.46 142.96 428.42 76.16 76.16 Mage 4 CUTTING EDGES SCRAM TIRES #174 REPAIR STROBE LIGHT MORSE CABLE MEALS REIMS. DECEMBER INSURANCE HAND PATCH H_AN0 PATCH MI SC SUPPLIES • * N iw 199S yt 9:2* M idMck Rvyistvr City of Orono 5M16 Totals Cliack Data 9041* MINN OOMN 1*-Moa>99 MIHM caw 9041* MIM COMM 90417 MINHEATOllS OKTCEM C0M7AMY 90417 16-NOV-99 Totals Chock a«j*or MIIMEA70I.IS OKTGEa COMOAMT 90417 NINN6AP0US ORTGCM COMOANT hock 90418 MIIMCSOTA TROONIES * GIFTS 90418 16-0OV99 Totals Chock auiter MtIMESOTA TROONIES * GIFTS 90418 MtIMESOTA TROPHIES * GIFTS hock RWiRior 90419 90419 MN TURF COMFERENCE 21-NOV-99 Totals Chock NuiRior MM TURF CONFERENCE 90419 MN TURF CONFERENCE hock NUiter 90420 90420 90420 90420 NAVARRE HARDWARE 16-NOV-99 16-NOV-99 16-NOV-99 Totsls Chock Nuibor NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE 90420 NAVARRE HARDWARE hock Nuiter 90421 90421 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 16-NOV-99 Totals Chock NioCior NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 90421 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER hock Nisiter 90422 90422 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 16-NOV-99 Totals Chock NuiRior O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 90422 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR hock NuiR)or 90423 90423 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 16-NOV-99 Totals Ch<Kk Nuiter PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 90423 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR .hack Ni«t>er 90424 90424 PCS INDUSTRIES 16-N0V-99 Totals Check Nuntier PCS INDUSTRIES 90424 PCS INDUSTRIES tion t 3*. 22 36.22 49.00 49.00 8.63 m • m m 8.63 ^.00 90.00 3.25 137.04 109.26 249.55 8.00 8.00 10.19 10.19 30.71 30.71 40.00 40.00 PAGE8 ^KVICE CXYCFM PLAQUI3 rop P.C. SEMINAP-STEMENHAGEN MI SC PARTS MI SC PARTS MI SC PARTS MEOICAL-OFTEOAHL Ml SC PARTS REPAIR SOIL AUGER PCS FORM 300-4 21 Rg¥ 1f95 Tui 5:28 PM Check 8iaber Date MMt Check Wuttwr 50425 PIONEER 50425 21-NW-95 ^lOUCEK 50425 21-Nov*95 PION€€R 50425 21-NOV-95 PIOMCER 50425 21-NOV-95 PIONCEft 50425 21-NOV-95 PIOMEEP 50425 21-Nov-95 PIONEER Check City ef Or«» Totals Check tuifcer 50425 PlOMCEk Check mMtrnr 50426 PMl«JE OMSET 50426 21-ltOV*95 PBAIRIE OFFSET Totals Check Witter 50426 WAieiE offset Check Nii*er 50427 PRTOk RESOueCES IMC. 50427 21-IIOV-95 MTO* RESOURCES IRC. Totals Check iiatwr 50427 PRYOR RESOJRCES IRC. Check Rinfcer 50428 R1T2 CAMERA 50428 50428 50428 16-lloy-95 16-ROV-95 16-10V-95 RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA Totals Check Hutber 50428 RITZ CAMERA Check M»jrt»er 50429 ROLF ERICKSOR ENTERPRISES 50429 21-ROV-95 ROLF ERICKSOR ENTERPRISES Totals Check Mu*er 50429 ROLF ERICKSOR ENTERPRISES Check Ru*er 50430 ROLLINS OIL CO. 50430 16-NOV-95 ROLLINS OIL CO. Totals Check iuiRser 50430 ROLLINS OIL CO. Check Riiiber 50431 SCHLIRIBERGER 50431 50431 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 SCHLUMBERGER SCHLUMBERGER Totals Check Ruiber 50431 SCHLUMBERGER Check Huiber 50432 SCOTT, GINGER 50432 21-Nov-95 SCOTT, GINGER Totals Check Nuiber 50432 SCOTT, GINGER Transaction 188.43 87.75 70.20 54.40 111.15 23.80 535.73 708.07 708.07 99.00 99.00 64.69 14.07 126.62 205.38 6,462.63 6,462.63 311.48 311.48 3.39 19.49 22.88 3,050.00 3,050.00 Pa90 6 nCPOSEO PROPERTY TAXLS PROPOSED ASSESSMENT HEAR MAXyELL BAT ACCESS LAM USE APPLICATIONS VACATION APPLICATIONS SUBDIVISION APPLICATION EN^LOPES 6 LETTERHEAD SEMINAR-JOHNSON FILM FILM FILM DECEMBER ASSESSING FEE OIL FOR SHOP GASOLINE CARDS GASOLINE CAROS KELLEY STORM SWR EASEMENT 11^ %mm %i»m OitckCity of OMm Omk lOati imA mrntmr S0U3 S0431 STA-tAFC LOQCSmTH 21*1^-95 STA-SAFE UXKSHITH Totals Chock ffUmtmr 50433 STA-Un lOQCSHITH liock Outer 50434 STiEICI«S 50434 16-0OV-95 STlEICliEIS Totals Chock Outer 50434 STAEICliEtS 50435 TQNCNECiC, LAAtY 50435 21*0ov-95 TONCMECK, UUAY Totals Chock Outer 50435 TOOCHECK. LARRY hock Outer 50436 US WEST CdOtiOICATIOOS 50436 50436 50436 21-0OV-95 2t0ov-95 21-0OV-95 US UEST CXIiiJilCATICOiS US UEST CCmjilCATICHS WEST CCmjEilCATlCOS Totals Chock Outer 50436 US WEST COmioICATIGHS hock Outer 5043/ UAROIOG LITES OF 00 50437 16-0OV-95 UAROIOG LITES OF m Totals Chock Outer 50437 UAROIOG LITES OF m rsnd Total Transactlof) AaoiRit 20.00 20.00 61.61 61.61 20.94 20.94 26.63 63.69 133.12 223.44 99.05 99.05 39,360.37 Ssfo 7 RE>KEY SQUAD HEADLIGHT,E2 JIO Rtim. SCHOOL COSTS US ISST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US ytST CHARGES BARRICADE REOTAL — • •• wm M CHKt teslittr CItr of Orons Chtck 50369 S0369 cm coum OEOIT UHOl 20*l«w95 cm OOUITT CKDIT UNION Totals Chock luNMr 50369 CITT CtUmP CKDIT UNION Chock Huiter 50370 HIST NATIOMl IMOC OP LAKES 50370 50370 20-HOW-95 20-NOW-95 PIKST UTiraAl tANK OP LAKES P’tST NATIONAL lANK OP LAKES Totals Chock luihar 50370 PItST NATIONAL NANK OP LAKES Oioek Nuiter 50371 CKEAT UEST LIFE ASSUSAMCE CO. 50371 20-NOV-95 CKEAT UEST LIFE ASSONANCE CO. Totals Chock UtMbmr 50371 GREAT UEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Chock Nuiter 50372 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT E COLL 503^20-NOV-95 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT 4 COLL Totals Check Huiter 50372 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT 4 COLL Chock Nu*or 50373 HENNEPIN COUNTT SUPPORT 4 COLL 50373 20-HOV-95 HENNEPIN COUNTT SUPPORT 4 COLL Totals Check Huitwr 50373 HENNEPIN COUNTT SUPPORT 4 COLL Check Nuit)er 50374 ICMA RETIREKNT TRUST - 457 50374 20-HOV-95 ICHA RETIREKNT TRUST • 457 Totals Check Nuiter 50374 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Huiter 50375 LAW ENFORCMENT UBOR SERVICE 50375 20 Nov-95 LAU ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Nuiber 50375 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Nuiter 50376 MN OEPT OF REVENUE 50376 20-NOV-95 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Nunber 50376 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Neater 50377 MN MUTUAL LIFE 50377 20-kc» "TS MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Htater 50377 MN MUTUAL LIFE tion 5.527.00 5.527.00 9,116.12 2,749.49 11,865.61 1.205.00 1.265.00 164.82 164.82 174.50 174.50 100.00 100.00 495.00 495.00 2.723.82 2.723.82 55.00 55.00 PaoR 1 SAVINGS W/N 4 TRANSFERRED PIT.PICA.WDCR U/N PICA.WDCR CITT SHARE DEFERRED C3TP U/H THOMTOH 6C0266780 SKREEN 1^0262310 deferred COHP U/H UNION DUES U/H STATE TAX U/H DEFERRED COMP U/H 1 *,‘.B ^ '‘<pi ' wii»" B aw 1f9S i «:24 m Cbadt l«a>stcr City «f 2 90S78 Tvtalt dMck Oat* S0S71 m STATE KTtB€Mii1-Oif C09* 20-«aw>05 M STATl BCTtKEIKNT-OEF CDPP> SC378 MN STATE tETIEEMEKT'OEF C09 $(079 OtaSGO/QBRA 50379 Total* ClMck TO-MowBS HBBCO/QIIA 50379 OEBSCO/OMU tMCk 50300 7CBSC0AIB COME Of NATOItS 50300 20-MOV-95 Total* Chock Muiter OEBSCO/US COME OE NA70KS $0300 NOSCO/US COME OE MAYORS ;?)OCk IhjMwr 50301 50351 50301 EERA 20-NOW-95 20-MOV-95 Total* Chock Mtoter OCRA RERA 50301 PERA hock Huiter 50382 50382 UMITEO WAT 20-MOV-95 Total* Chock NcHbor UMITEC WAT 50382 UMITEO WAT ;r»iO Total Trahoactlen Aaouii 100.00 100.00 U.52 14.52 1.365.00 1.365.00 3,497.38 4.588.81 8.086.19 29.00 29.00 V 965.46 COBHiWt* BEFERREO COMP W/'i CORA OEFERREL COMP W/H USCM DEFERRED COMP W/N EERA EMPIOTEE M/N PLRA CITY SHARE CHARITY OOMATIOMS W/H I.' f 8 MV IMS mm M OMci: Mvistcr City •# Oram Qiactt CMtajFM i) Chaek lHQa4 Q4Q2t4 CM.UMAM Jt.. TotaU dtaek 0a0284 04Q28S eatTTCM. J. OULNII Totals Q402S3 Chaek 040286 04086 HJU, JOELLEI L. Totals Chack MuMar 040286 Chack 040287 040287 JA8HUR. CAB8IEL Totals Chack stvbar 040287 Check NtJrisar 040288 040288 ttUIY. CHAiLES Totals Chack Muit)er 040288 Cieck iKJikwr 040339 040339 •OSHA, JAMIE L Totals Check Mvjitjar 040339 Check auktoar 040340 040340 HAUm, DOROTHY M. Totals Check Mvjitjer 040340 Cheek HuV>er 040341 J. 040341 MASEHAM, CAROLE A Totals Check Huikser 040341 Check Munber 040342 04034.-0C»SE. RCHALO J. Totals Check Mtntwr 040342 Chack Data T3-faw9S n-iov-95 1S-S0V-95 13-H0V-95 13-HOV-9S 22-40V-95 22-HOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-HOV-95 Chack It 220.65 220.45 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 247.28 247.28 891.14 891.14 731.33 731.33 1.516.89 1.516.89 Om^ City of 0&Q3&3 9uaa «E£. ii»A s. Total* Chock iulfeof 040343 Stock 0403U 040SU iCUEHl, TSKAS R* Totals Chock 0403U Oiock acaPor 040345 040345 RILLOI, CHIISTCPHES k. Total* Chock atJiPor 040345 3!0Ck Ihjitoor 040340 040340 OLSON, JOES C. Totals Chock r 040346 !Si*ek HuiRjor 040347 040347 ANOEKSOR, BRUCE L. Totals Chock tiunbor 040347 Stock Nutbor 04034B 040348 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Total* Check Munbor 040348 Stock Niaber 040349 040349 sons, SCOTT U. Totals Check Nuiber 040349 :heck Nuiber 040350 040350 CABLSDI. NICHAEL B Totals Check Bunber 040350 Stock Nutbor 040351 040351 CHESUICK, CART B Total* Chock Nubor 040351 Stock Mutbor 040352 t • Chock Date 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-Nov9S 22-BOV-95 22-MOV-95 22-Nov-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 Chock 715.96 715.96 1.20.31 1.223.31 823.11 823.11 730.54 730.54 365.95 365.95 630.80 630.80 823.47 823.47 431.59 431.59 1,259.34 1,259.34 f n Wm 1W5 IM 9:01 « Cte£k tnfrttr City of 0fe» tiipioyoo CMck »ater 04Q3S2 040352 COtilCK. JA«S U Totolt Chock tMfcOf 040352 Chock 040353 0403S3 DEMOUSKI. JAY C Totolo Chock 040353 C*_fCk mjitoo^ 0403>4 04C'54 EHCLISM III. IRVING n Touts Chock mji*)or 040354 Chock iuifcor 040355 040355 IktCKSCB, OJRT Totolt Chock r 040355 Chock iuifcer 040356 040356 YISCHOilCH, OAJ T Totolt Chock toitjor 040356 Chock BLflbor 040357 040357 mAMSING, CAROL J. Totolt Chock Nvjftjor 040357 Chock Nuitoor 040358 040358 JOHMSOS, BRADLEY P Tottlt Check Mutter 040358 Chock MuitJer 040359 040359 kn OLLENBERG, KRISTIM L Totolt Check Nurkjer 040359 Check hLinber 040360 040360 HCMIW S. DAVID L Totals Check Muiier 040360 Check MiFbor 040361 Chock Dote 22-»o»-W 22-NCV-95 22-«ov-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-Nov-95 22-NOV-95 22-M0V-95 Root 3 Check 1,201.36 1,201.34 1.041.14 1.041.14 410.73 410.73 1,036.90 1,036.90 999.66 999.66 312.37 312.37 1,087.28 1,087.28 520.67 520.67 468.53 468.53 J a iw msi 9:06 M Ck«efc tStmci Ictitttr City of OroRS C«ptev«« M«» 060361 040361 IOR3UCZYNSXI. JM«S Totolo Chock lu^or Q6Q361 Omck mmtmr 040362 040362 9CISEU. WIILIAM *. Totals Chock luiter 040362 3iack ihoi>or 040363 040363 SCJWEHHOff, JOHN •, Totals Chock Hu^r 040363 3»ock Muitoor 040364 040364 TWWTOII, "ASIC «• Totals Chock Ouabor 040364 Check ouitwr 040365 040365 TOHCHECIC, LAWRENCE F. Totals Chock liurtxr 040365 Check Nusbor 040366 040366 TOUCZYK. NARK U. Totals Chock Kuntoer 04036/ Chock Mu>toor 040367 040367 FARHIOK, CORREY L. Totals Chock Muitoer 040367 Chock Moi*)or 040368 040368 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Hutbor 040368 Chock Nurbor 040369 040369 CArFRON, MICHAEL P« Totals Check Husbor 040369 Check HinkJor 040370 Check Oat* 22-1100-99 22-Nov-95 22-MOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-HOV-95 22-NOV-95 Chock 1.239.83 •••••••• 1.239.83 271.10 271.10 823.08 823.08 868.10 868.10 181.17 181.17 1.104.24 1.104.2'* 202.59 202.59 130.11 130.11 909.25 909.25 •• 1 Hi' a io» tfw ma M CtMCk Qi«ek fcfitttr City •# Orone Ci^ayM law Chack liatef 040370 040370 MMUSTR. JtAimf «. Totals Chock ilMacf 040370 Chock lk«bor 040371 040371 OMR. LTLf C. Totals Chock Rvaiter 040371 Chock 040372 0403a VANS. BkUCS L. Totals Chock Hu N mc 040372 iChock 040373 040373 bECtCHAN, STEPHEN J. Totals Check Nuitoer 040373 Check Muiter 040374 040374 MINICHAUS, JOHN f Totals Check Noflber 040374 Check Niwtoer 040373 040375 CERMAIIOSC*, JOHN N Totals Check NuNoer 040375 Check Niiit)er 040376 040376 GREGORY, JANES 0. Totals Check Nurtwr 040376 Check Ntrtoer 040377 040377 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Nurber 040377 Check Hui*)er 040378 040378 OBERAICNER, SCOTT G Totals Check Nuitwr 040378 iChack Cafe a*8ov93 22-NOV-5S 22-NOV-95 22-NOV-95 22-Nov-95 22-HOV-95 22-HOV-95 22 -MOV-93 22-Nov-95 Check 1,116.42 1,116.42 1.006.40 1.096.40 913.25 913.25 60.15 60.15 1,023.37 1,023.37 1,279.39 1,279.39 606.59 606.39 680.91 680.91 820.52 820.52 Check Nurtber 040379 ¥ mi f:06iM City •# Oron® E^loyrc «»• 040379 040379 OBIEII. RAMOT L Tottl* Chack QJifcef 040379 :iMck 040380 0403NI Totals Chock SiOCk Niflitoor 040381 9AUCK. GACGCRT A 040380 040381 UTHSUH. lARRT J. Totals Chock Ituiter 040381 3)«ck thjitoor 040382 040382 SklEEK, DALE S. Totals Chock sciitwr 040382 3i«k Nuitoof 040383 040383 FETERSOM, JACK U Totals Chock Mu«faer 040383 Chock koitoor 040384 040384 STEFFEMHACEk, RONALD E Totals Check ku«*)or 040334 Chock Data 22*iev*95 22-S3V-93 22-«ov95 22-IOV-95 22-kOv-95 22-HOV-95 Fago 6 Oiock 168.42 168.42 605.61 605.61 1,058.70 1,058.70 710.56 710.56 24.79 24.79 981.50 981.50 Grand Total 35,458.61 n 199S Tu* 5:2* ra Ctacfc fctUtar C<ty of Or«n» tot*tw S0383 uam nra M>Rov>95 /WCMOi PAKR Totals Chock luriMr 50383 AICNCi rSKR ha^ S0384 tCA/KKEiaiC SCtENa LAS 18-lev9S tCA/FOSENSIC SCIENCE US Totals Chock NuiiMr 50384 ICA/FOSENSIC SCIENCE LAS Oiock Nvfiter 50385 BITUNtKXa ROADUATS INC. 50385 16-SOV-95 IITWINOUS SOAOWAYS INC. Totals Check Hijiiwr 50385 BITUAINOUS ROADWAYS INC. aisek Nu*er 50386 BLACKOUIAK 1 SON 50386 21-NOV-95 BLACKOWIAK & SON 50386 21-NOV-95 BLACKOUIAK 4 SON 50386 21-Nov-95 BLACKOUIAK 4 SON 50386 16-NOV-95 BLACKOUIAK 4 SON 50386 16-NOV-95 BLACKOUIAK t SON Totals Check Ntfiter 50386 BLACKOUIAK 4 SON Chock NuSbcr 50387 50387 50387 BUDGET PfINTINC 21-Nov-95 16-NOV-95 budget PRINTING budget printing Totals Check Nu*or 503C7 BUDGET PRINTING Check NuNBer 50388 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 50388 50388 50388 50388 21-HOV-95 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Totals Check UiMiter 50388 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Nortoer 50389 CITY OF MINNETCNKA 50389 16-N0V-95 CITY OF MIMHETCNKA Totals Check Nu*er 50389 CITY OF HINHETCNKA Check Nurtier 50390 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 50390 16-NOV-95 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Totals Check Nuiter 50390 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH i i ’ #* TraAsactfon ftaount Consents 637.91 03PT PAPER 637.91 40.00 INTOXYLUER COURSE-NCNICH 40. BO 733.99 ilTCRETE 733.99 70.44 OCT SERVICE 293.89 OCT SERVICE 168.58 OCT SERVICE 150.00 FALL CLEANUP 700.94 FALL CLEANUP 1,383.85 100.75 OOM. ABUSE FORKS 7.39 RETURN FAULTY MONITOR 108.14 133.74 <172 ELECT. UOR*' 40.59 IIM71 ELEC. WORK 89.30 #172 OIL CHANGE.UIPERS 229.02 #170 TUNE UP 492.65 8,970.00 4TH QTR PROSECUTION 8,970.00 80.29 REIMS. POLICE PETTY CASH C1.29 • r 21 Hvy im Tut S:2* m Check Rtgisttr City of Craw Cheek Pate Check Ruriier S«91 S0991 CITT OR yATZATA 1«-hee-95 CUT V UAT2ATA TctAlt Cheek euitoer 50391 CITT Of uatZATA >4rk amfeer 50392 COLONIAL Lift IMSUkANCf CO. 50392 16-19V-95 COLONIAL LI FI INSURANCE CO. Totali CheJt 50392 COLONlAt LIFE INSURANCE CO. Check ihater 50393 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. 50393 16-NOV-95 CONNELLY 1>©USTRIAL ELEC. Total* Check ftafeer 50393 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. 3>eck Nurtwr 50394 DEPT Of PUNLIC SAFETY 50394 16*Nov-95 DEPT Of PURL IC SAFETY Total* Check Ni^tser 50394 DEPT OF PURLIC SAFETY *,heck Nurtjer 50395 EARL F. ANOtRSON R ASSOC. 50395 50395 50395 16-NOV-95 16-N0V-O5 16-NOV-95 EARL F. Al.i;eRSON t ASSOC. EARL F. ANDERSON t ASSOC. EARL F. ANDERSON t ASSOC. Total* Check NuiiJer 50395 EARL f. ANOERSON & ASSOC. Check Nuitoer 50396 ESS BROTHERS i SONS 50396 16-NOV-95 ESS BROTHERS A SONS Total* Check Hurijer 50396 ESS BROTHERS i SONS Check Nu*er 50397 BULL'S HANUFACTURING CO. INC. 50397 16-NOV-95 EULu'S NANUFACTURIl »^tv.a Check Ni^P 50397 BULL'S NANUFACTURI! C* vk Nirter 50398 FEED RITE CONTROLS 50393 16"Nov-95 FEED RITE CONTROLS Total* Check NUTtoer 50398 FEED RITE CONTROLS Check Nuiuer 50399 C * K SERVICES 50399 16-NOV-95 G t K SERVICES Transaction Aanunt 3,705.45 3,705.45 693.52 693.52 254.63 254.63 510.00 510.00 305.52 69.40 616.87 991.79 74.55 74.55 Pa«e 2 Coeiaent# 3RD QTR WATER CHARGES DECEMBER INSURANCE ALTERNATCRS CONNECT ICM CHARGES ORONO NOTICE SIGNS UTILITY DROP BOX SIGN CHANNEL POSTS ADJUSTMENT RINGS CO. NC.700.02 MANHOLE RINGS CO. INC.700.02 35.00 CONTAINER CHARGE 35.00 8.48 RATHBUN $. 1 MW 1995 ut 5:26 PM Check Check lealster City of Orono Page 3 3,eck Hui*»r 50403 HASEMAM. CAROLE 50403 21-NOV-95 HASEMAM, CAROLE Totals Check Murber 50403 HASEMAM, CAROLE :heck Hurt)er 50404 ITHACA 50404 21-MOV-95 ITHACA Totals Check Minber 50404 ITHACA :heck H^r 50405 J.R.'S APPLIAMCE DISPOSAL INC. 50405 16-MOV-95 J-R-'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC, Totals Check Nutber 5(U0‘ J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. :heck Nifiber 50406 JOHhiCw, «*AP 50406 16-NOV-95 JOHNSON. BRAD Total. Check NiJ*er 50406 JOHNSON. BRAD Check NuM*r 50407 LAFAYETTE CLUB 50407 16-N0V-95 LAFAYETTE CLUB Transaction Anount MuMer Date Naaie iMck Nuiber 50399 G t K SERVICES 51.46 50399 16-NOV-95 G 8 K SERVICES 2 50399 16-MOV-95 G i K SERVICES 8.48 50399 16-NOV-95 G i K SERVICES 84.96 5»99 16-NOV-95 G 6 K SERVICES 2.64 50399 16-NOV-95 G A K SERVICES Totals Check Nuiber 50399 G 8 K SERVICES 158.66 3ieck Nuiber 50400 GARELICK STEEL CO INC. 50400 16-H0V-95 GARELICK STEEL CO INC.93.26 Totals Check Nuiber 50400 GARELICK STEEL CO INC.93.26 :heek Niwt..-.50401 GREAT WESTERN SUPPLY CO 50401 16-NOV-95 GREAT WESTERN SUPPLY CO 301.87 Totals Check Nurber 50401 GREAT WESTERN SUPPLY CO 301.87 :heck Nuiber 50402 GROUP HEALTH INC. 50402 16-NOV-95 GROUP HEALTH INC.301.00 3 472.24 50402 16-NOV-95 GROUP HEALTH INC. Totals Check Nunber 50402 GROUP HEALTH INC.3,773.24 15.08 15.08 193.70 193.70 30.00 30.00 9.30 9.30 2-27 Comnents STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN STREET DEPT STEFFENHAGEN SCRAP METAL PUBLIC SAFETY MAGNETS DECEMBER HEALTH INS DECEMBER HEALTH INS REIMB. MILEAGE SLIP PRINTER RIBBONS APPLIANCE PICKUP MEALS REIMB. REM. BAUNCE f-: 21 MOV 1995 ?(» 5:26 Vn Check Check Check Reetstcr City of Orono 0ate lane 50407 UFAYETTE CLUt Totals Check Check kuitoer 50408 Totals Check Check Nuiter 50409 50407 LAFAYETTE CLUt 50408 UMO EQUIPMEMT 16-NOV-95 UNO EOUIPHENT 50408 LANO EOUtPHENT 50409 LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE 16-MOV-95 Totals Check Nurtier LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE 50409 LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE Check Runber 50410 50410 MACDONALD U80RAT0RIES 16-Mov*95 Totals Check NunfOer MACDONALD LABORATORIES 50410 MACDONALD LABORATORIES Check N«<sep 50411 MACQUEEN EQUIFMENT 50411 16-NOV-95 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Totals Check Nvj«ber 50411 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT •3»eck NuiiseP 50412 MCNICHOLS, DAVID 50412 16-MOV-95 MCNICHOLS, DAVID Totals Check Nu*er 50412 MCNICHOLS, DAVID Check Nunber 50413 50413 MEDCENTER HEALTH CARE 16-NOV-95 Totals Check Nurfcer MEDCENTER HEALTH CARE 50413 MEDCENTER HEALTH CARE Check Nuii>er 50414 50414 50414 MIDWEST ASPHALT 16-NOV-95 16-N0V-95 Totals Check Mijitier MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT 50414 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Nui<>er 50415 50415 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 21-MOV-95 Totals Check Nui*>er MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 50415 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS Check Nuit*r 50416 MINN COMM Transaction Aaouit 2.27 195.16 195.16 72.50 72.50 462.99 462.99 57.18 57.18 3.81 3.81 1,756.47 1,756.47 285.46 142.96 428.42 76.16 76.16 Paee 4 Ca wisen ts CUTTING EDGES SCRAP TIRES i174 REPAIR STROBE LIGHT HORSE CABLE NEALS REIMS. DECEMBER INSURANCE HAND PATCH HAND PATCH MISC SUPPLIES 4 21 lov 199S Tua 9:2«P!I Check lefistcr City of Orono Chock Oott S0416 50416 MINN CCMM 16-NOV-96 MINN Totals Chock Hiflbtr 50416 MINN COMM Chock Ntater 50417 50417 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 16*NOV*95 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Niwber 50417 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check NU*>er 50418 MINNESOTA TROPHIES 1 GIFTS 50418 16-NOV-95 MINNESOTA TROPHIES t GIFTS Totals Check Nuiter 50418 MINNESOTA TROPHIES I GIFTS 3ieck NuiRwr 50419 MN TURF CONFERENCE 50419 21-Nov-95 MN TURF CONFERENCE Totals Check Neuter 50419 MN TURF CONFERENCE Check Nuiter 50420 NAVARRE NARDUARE 50420 50420 50420 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE Totals Check Nuiter 50420 NAVARRE HARDWARE Check Nu*er 50421 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 50421 16-HOV-95 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Totals Check Muter 50421 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER aieck Nuter 50422 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 50422 16-NOV-95 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Totals Check Nuter 50422 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Check Nuter 50423 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 50423 16-NOV-95 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR Totals Check Nuter 50423 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR Check Nuter 50424 PCS INDUSTRIES 50424 16-NOV-95 PCS INDUSTRIES Totals Check Nuter 50424 PCS INDUSTRIES Transaction Anouit 36.22 36.22 45.00 45.00 8.63 8.63 90.00 90.00 3.25 137.04 109.26 249.55 8.00 8.00 10.19 10.19 30.71 30-71 40.00 40.00 Paoe 5 CaiBBents PAGER SERVICE OXYGEN PLAQUES FOR P.C. MEM8ERS SEHINAR-STEFFENHACEN MISC PARTS MI SC PARTS NISO PARTS MEDICAL-OFTEDAHL MISC PARTS REPAIR SOIL AUGER PCS FORM 300-4 4 • 7! Roe 1995 Twe 5:26 PM Check mMmr Date ■a« Cheek lluiter 504S PlOiEER 50425 21-Nov-95 PIONKR 50425 21-Nov-95 PICMEER 50425 21-NOV-95 PICNEER 50425 21-NOV-95 PIONEER 50425 21-Nov-95 PICNEER 50425 21-NOV-95 PICNEER check Register City of Orono TOMIS Check kuitoer 50425 PIOkEE* meek lU!t>eP 50426 PMIRIE offset 50426 21-kov-95 PRAIRIE OFFSET Totals Cheek kuitjer 50426 PRAIRIE OFFSET meek Munber 50427 PRtCR RESOURCES IHC. 50427 21*Mov-95 PRTCR RESOURCES IRC, Totals Check IfuiRwr 50427 PRYOR RESOURCES INC Check Nui*)er 50429 ROLF ERICKSOII ENTERPRISES 50429 21-M0V-95 ROLF ERICKSON FMTERPRISES Totals Cheek Mu.t>er 50429 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Nui*)ef 50430 ROLLINS OIL CO. 50430 16-MOV-95 ROLLINS OIL CO. Totals Check NU-*r 50430 ROLLINS OIL CO. Check Nui*>er 50431 SCHLUHBERGER 50431 50431 16-NOV-95 16-NOV-95 SCHLUHBERGER SCHLUHBERGER Totals Check Norther 50431 SCHLUHBERGER Check Nuttoer 50432 SCOTT, CINCER 50432 21 ’Mov-95 SCOTT, GINGER Totals Check N^r 50432 SCOTT, CINCER TraTBaction Aanuit 188.43 87.75 70.20 54.40 111.15 23.80 535.73 708.07 708.07 99.00 99.00 6,462.63 6,462.63 311.48 311.48 3.39 19.49 22.88 3,050.00 3,050.00 Page 6 Coanents PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES PROPOSED ASSESSMENT HEAR maxwell bay ACCESS LAND USE APPLICATIONS VACATICN APPLICATIONS SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ENVELOPES 8 LETTERHEAD SEMINAR-JOHNSCN Check NuMber 50428 RITZ CAMERA 64.69 FILM 50428 16-NOV-95 RITZ CAMERA 14.07 FILM 50428 16-NOV-95 RITZ CAMERA 126.62 FILM 50428 16-NOV-95 RITZ CAICRA Totals Check Nurber 50428 RITZ CAMERA 205.38 DECEMBER ASSESSING FEE OIL FOR SHOP GASOLINE CARDS GASOLINE CARDS KELLEY STORM SWR EASEMENT ■ev IffS b S:tt PH Check Itgister City ef Or«» Cheek Oatt 50433 50433 STA-SAFC LOCKSMITH 21*llav*95 STA-SAFE LOCXSIITH Totals Chock Rt^or S0433 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH S0434 STREICHERS 50434 16-B0V-95 STREICNERS Totals Chock lhater 50434 STREICHERS wck Huiter 50435 TQMCHEOC, LARRT 50435 21-HOV-95 TOMCHECK, LARRT Totals Chock Htater 50435 TOMCHECK, LARRT rock Hu*or 50436 US WEST COMMUHICATIOHS 50436 50436 50436 21-HOV-95 21-HOV-95 21-HOV-95 US WEST COMMUHICATIOMS US WEST COMMUHICATIOHS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Totals Check Hiater 50436 US WEST COMMUH'CATIOMS rock HuH>or 50437 WARNING LITES OF MN 50437 16-H0V-95 WARNING LITES OF MH Totals Check Nu*er 50437 WARNING LITES OF HH rand Total Transaction Anount 20.00 20.00 61.61 61.61 20.94 20.94 26.63 63.69 133.12 223.44 99.05 09.05 39,380.37 IPago 7 Cmmcnts RE-KET SQUAD HEADLIGHT,EZ JIM REIMS. SCHOOL COSTS US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES BARRICADE RENTAL ITT— 20 NOV 199S Non 6:24 M Check kegister City of orofw Check (r bate r >,0369 50369 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 20-NOV-95 CITY COUNTY CREDIT IflIICf Total* Chock 50369 CITY raUNTY CREDIT UNICN Chock Nuiter 50370 FIRST NATIONAL lANK OF LAKES 50370 50370 20-NOV-95 20-NOV-95 FIRST NATIONAL SANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Chock Niiiter 50370 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Chock NUTbor 50371 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 50371 20-NOV-95 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO, Totals Chock Nu*>er 50371 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Chock Nuiber 50372 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT i COLL 50372 20-NOV-95 HENNEPIN CO. SIffPORT A COLL Total* Chock Nuibcr 50372 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT A COLL Qfock Ninber 50373 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A COLL 50373 20-NOV-95 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A COLL Total* Check Ninber 50373 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A COLL Chock Nuiber 50374 IONA RETIREMENT TRUST • 457 50374 20-MOV-95 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST * 457 Total* Check Nutber 50374 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Nurber 50375 LAW ENfCRCMENT LABOR SERVICE 50375 20-NOV-95 LAW EMFORCMEMT LABOR SERVICE Total* Check Nimber 50375 LAW ENFOICMENT LABOR SERVICE Check NiJiber 50376 MM DEPT OF REVENUE 50376 20-NOV-95 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Total* Check Nurber 50376 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Nuiber 50377 MN WJTUAL LIFE 50377 20-NOV-95 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Cheek Nirter 50377 MN MUTUAL LIFE Transaction AffounC 5.527.00 5.527.00 9,116.12 2,749.49 11,865.61 1.265.00 1.265.00 164.82 164.82 174.50 174.50 100.00 100.00 495.00 495.00 2,723.82 2,723.82 55.00 55.00 Pago 1 Conrwnts SAVINGS W/H A TRANSFERRED FIT.FICA.MEOCR W/H FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE DEFERRED COMP W/H THOMTCN iC0266780 SKREEN 9C0262310 DEFERRED COMP W/H L-NION DUES W/H STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H ( ;h«ck mMtrnr 50379 PEBSCO/QBRA 50379 20-BOV-95 PEBSCO/OSRA Totals Check MtBfcer 50379 PEBSC0/C8RA :heck IhJikjer 50380 PEBSCO/US COBF OP MAYORS 50380 20-BOV-95 PEBSCO/US CCNF OF MAYORS Totals Check Huiijer 50380 PEBSCO/US COMF OF MAYORS •Jieck mmt»r 50381 PERA 50381 50381 20-MOV-95 20-MOV-95 PERA PERA Totals Check M^Jl*)er 50381 PERA :heck Murtjer 50382 UNITED WAY 50382 20-NOV-95 UNITED WAY Totals Check Nuiter 50382 UNITED WAY irand Total 14.52 14.52 1,365.00 1,365.00 3,497.33 4,588.81 8,086.19 29.00 29.00 31,965.46 » • 9 Nov 1995 on 6:24 PM Check Register City of Orono Chock M««bor Dat* Mm Trai»action Amount Coaments 9Mcfc HuriMr 50378 50378 MM STATE RETIREMENT-OEF COMP 20-ltoy-95 MN STATE RETIREMENT-OEF COMP 100.00 deferred COMP W/H Totals Cheek iiiAer 50378 MN STATE RETIREMENT-OEF COMP 100.00 Page 2 CBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H USCH DEFERRED COMP W/H PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H B INFORMATION ITOMS COUNCIL MEETING a' *■ Ntf • I r.:i:rTi:;G OF NOV 2 7 1995 <■ :TV 3C JtgOJ^C PEPMITS ISSUED/F1EES COLI£CTH3 OCTOBER 1995REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/95PERMIT TYPEBuilding SQL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/RBMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/REMODEL INST-ADD/REMODEL SF-LAND ALT DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING FIREPLACE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTUREl UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer k Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD k/OR TANK SAC ONLY Sub-total Sign TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION LAWN SPRINKLER ZONING REVIEW Sub-total Grand-total QTY5 19 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 33* ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/95 - 10/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 10/01/94 - 10/31/94BASE FEB10,106.75 3,716.75 484.00 0.00 149.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 837.00 15,294.25* VALUATION1,639,600.00 288,940.00 28,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56,300.00 2,021,840.00* PLAN REVIEW6,569.38 1,859.97 292.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 544.05 9,265.41* QTY5 25 4 1 1 1 I 1 3 42* BASE FEE VALUATION6 3 739 843 416 80 54 63 54 30 396 50 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 511,821 398,250 39,800 0 3.000 4.000 2,600 0 33,700 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 11,676.00*1.993,171.00* PLAN REVIEW4,380.69 1,957.17 270.40 0.00 35.10 40.95 35.10 0.00 257.4C 6,976.81* 7 498.75 37,581.38 0.00 6 755.00 60,400.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 309.38 15,450.00 0.00 5 246.25 16,700.00 0.00 4 140.00 1,650.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,000.00 0.00 2 70.00 2,050.00 0.00 1 35.00 060.00 0.00 22*1,053.13*58,231.38*0.00*16*1,176.25*80,660.00*0.00* 15 096.25 55,369.60 0.00 26 1,959.70 131,720.00 0.00 1 56.25 4,500.00 • 0.00 1 35.00 • 400.00 0.00 16*952.50*59,069.60*0.00*27*1,994.70*132,120.00*0.00* 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 5 175.00 0.00 0.00 0^ 0^ 0^ 3 300.00 0.00 0.00 6 550.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 1,600.00 0.00 0. uO mm mm mm m 6*420.CO*0.00*0.00*13*2,325.00*0.00*0.00* 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 4*120.00*0.00*0.00*2*60.00*0.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 187.50 15,000.00 0.00 \J 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*1*187.50*15,000.00*0.00* 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 2 125.00 0.00 0.00 mm 0% 0m 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 mm 0% 0\ 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3*115.00*0.00*0.00*2*125.00*0.00*0.00* 84**17, 954.80**2,139,940.90**9,265.41**103* *17,544.45**2,220,951.00**6,976.81* nsscssr^-BPORT NBR. DFBBRm-1 ^TB OP RUN 11/01/95 PEFMrrS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/95 TO 10/31/95BUILDING ASB FEB LAN RBVIBN URCHARGB .IC. SEARCH PEB AC investigation )EPOSIT 1AIL IN •'ERMIT TOTAL 15,294.25 9,265.41 1,011.36 0.00 050.00 0.00 0.00 26,421.02 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN ll/Oi/95 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN PERMIT TOTAL 17,954.08 9,265.41 1,077.26 0.00 050.00 0.00 0.00 15.90 29,163.45 MECHANICAL 1,053.13 0.00 30.'“5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 .40 1,095.00 PLUMBING SEWER li WATER 952.50 0.00 31.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 900.85 420.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 423.00 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/95 TO 10/31/95 OCTOBER 1995USER 115.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.50 PAGE: 32REQUESTER: CAROLSSIGNFIRE 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 120.00 0.00 PAGE: 33 REQUESTER: CAROLE i /f^o, HOV 1, 1995, 3:34 PMBRMIT8 ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF BRMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1OCTOBER 1995ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY 33C ! ME 01 2485 THOROUGHBRED LA01 2575 THOROUGHBRED LA01 565 LEAF ST01 1115 COX FARM RD01 340 NORTH ARM LA 02 1699 NORTH FARM RD 02 1945 FOX RIDGE RD 02 1375 PARK DR 02 1670 BHADYWOOD RD 03 2673 PHEASANT RD 04 35 HACKBERRY HILL 04 2470 DUNWOODY AVF 04 1385 FOX ST 06 3468 LYRIC AVB 06 3050 6TH AVE N 06 2109 SUGARWOOD DR 09 3850 WATERTOWN RD 09 2630 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 11 3780 TOGO RD 11 3100 RIDGEWOOD CIR 11 615 MINNETONKA HOLD LA 11 1645 SHADYWOOD RD 11 1155 LOMA LINDA AVE 11 3405 CRYSTAL BAY RD 14 1655 BOHNS PT RD 15 950 DAKOTA AVE 19 2605 WAYZATA BLVD 24 1410 CHERRY PL 29 2601 WEST LAFAYETTE RU 29 3085 CASCO POINT RD 29 4330 NORTH SHORE DR 29 2709 WALTERS PORT LA 29 1385 CHERRY PL 33C 01 1790 SHADYWOOD RD 01 2780 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 2655 COUNTRYSIDE Dk W 01 2485 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 3050 6TH AVE N 01 2965 DEER RUN TR 01 1973 FAGERNESS POINT RD 01 3020 NORTH SHORE DR 01 160 TRUFFULA TR 02 1385 CHERRY PL 02 1200 TONKAWA RD 02 3843 CHERRY AVE 02 30 LUCE LINE RIDGE 19 3701 SHORELINE DR 20 2380 SHADYWOOD RD 24 2450 COUNTRYSIDE DR 24 3895 BAYSIDE RD 29 2685 PHEASANT RD 29 1200 TONKAWA RD 95/10/13 OR- 95/10/04 OR- 95/10/02 OR- 95/10/11 OR- 95/10/25 OR- 95/10/05 OR- 95/10/10 OR- 95/10/11 OR- 95/10/12 OR- 95/10/20 OR- 95/10/12 OR- 95/10/17 OR- 95/10/27 OR- 95/10/13 OR- 95/10/19 OR- 95/10/24 OR- 95/10/10 OR- 95/10/17 OR- 95/10/04 OR- 95/10/09 OR- 95/10/16 OR 95/10/17 OR 95/10/19 OR 95/10/25 OR 95/10/19 OR 95/10/16 OR 95/10/16 OR 95/10/17 OR 95/10/05 OR 95/10/06 OR 95/10/16 OR 95/10/31 OR 95/10/31 OR 007340007370007399007437007468 007407 007414 007415 007438 007465 007440 007446 •007482 ■007431 ■007460 •007469 -007432 -007439 -007409 -007425 -007449 -007456 -007464 -007475 -007459 -007446 -007452 -007454 -007410 -007411 -007-150 -007183 -007496 1559025115590251147526221435844315447333 14732221 19381139 00000000 14716390 00000000 00000000 14749682 14719022 00000000 15226163 17788752 19332255 15429000 00000000 17294420 19388150 00000000 00000000 18238046 14747218 00000000 14724300 15375995 14724118 00000000 00000000 14703980 00000000 EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC JAMES W BRUCE HOMES FEATURE BUILDERS #1167 ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES STONEHOUSE DESIGNS REIERSON CUSTOM HOMES KEN ROELOFS CONST INC REED GARY GERMAIN CONST UNLIMITED NOONAN CONSTRUCTION INC PRICES CONSTRUCTION k REM CUSTOM POOLS INC DALPHIN POOL (it SPA ED SHERIDAN ENTERPRISES PEAK ROOFING SELA ROOFING MOE EDWARD UPWARD BOUND DESIGN ti CONS T.R. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. C A SMITH INC OWNER LAST NM VALUATION272,100.00EIDEN273,000.00BRUCE• 340,000.00 208,500.00NEILSON546,000.00PERKINS83,000.00 KIRKMAN 8,000.00 MURPHY 5,000.00 KIEI.LEY 80,000.00 BROWN 5,000.00 WAGMAN 9,800.00 LUECK 10,000.00 GOETTEN 31,500.00 MITTELSTAEDT 3,456.00 KE7.AR 9,800.00 AHLERS 9,000.00 HARRIS 10,000.00 DEVOR 15,000.00 MCMILLAN 1,500.00 CASHIN 5,840.00 WILE 2,000.00 HARVEY 129.00 GEYEN 1,575.00 DARLING 8,240.00 NEWMAN 2,000.00 OLEN 1 1,000.00 9,000.00 1 WILBUR 2,900.00 OLSON 14,000.00 DOTZENROTH 20,000.00 STELOW 3,000.00 DUNKLEY 30,000.00 JAMES 1,500.00 95/10/02 OR- 95/10/03 OR- 95/10/04 OR- 95/10/13 OR- 95/10/20 OR- 95/10/20 OR- 95/10/25 OR- 95/10/30 OR- 95/10/30 OR- 95/10/03 OR- 95/10/09 OR- 95/10/09 OR- 95/10/16 OR- 95/10/25 OR- 95/10/30 OR 95/10/02 OR 95/10/10 OR 95/10/05 OR 95/10/06 OR 007403 007401 007413 007415 00746b 007470 007470 007186 -007492 -007105 -007424 -007128 -007151 -007171 -007188 -007106 -007130 -007416 -007120 37862341 34283677 15590251 15590251 00000000 38940005 34702452 34709559 36332561 00000000 34202026 35228475 36332561 35574900 34745826 38711717 39414211 36332561 35453797 CORONADO STONE HEATING k COOLING TWO EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC BURNSVILLE HEATING CO SCHERBER k SONS INC DITTER INC FIRESIDE CORNER PRACTICAL SYSTEMS SILVERNAIL MARK FIRESIDE CORNER THERMO-DYNE INC MESSENGER EXCAVATING INC A-ABC APPLIANCE t. HEATING KLEVE HTG k AC FIRESIDE CORNER M H SEIFERT CONST URBAN 1,000.00 EIDEN 6,000.00 4,500.00 EIDEN 1,200.00 KEZAR 3,450.00 ANDREA 18,000.00 SIVER 800.00 SWENSON 750.00 800.00 JAMES 900.00 BUTCHER 200.00 ANDERSON 2,400.00 LEINFZ 1,000.00 CREAR 4.400.00 1.250.00 grande 2,781.38 KELLEY 3,100.00 MAXSOM 2,300.00 BUTCHER 1,200.00 >?D, NOV 1, 1995, 3j34 PMtiRMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBEKERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 31995ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONROTH400.00FISHER• 1,500.00•SERW4 4,500.00MURPHY950.00JUNDT4.500.00 9.500.00 BANGERT 14,000.00 STODDART 324.00 PALM 6,500.00 LEINTZ 4,800.00 WAADE 100.00 LAVERE 5,000.00 OSMONSON 200.00 OLSON 2,800.00 RUMSEN 95.60 REBSTOCK 500.00 KIRKMAN 1,100.00 SCHUMACKER 5,000.00 OSMONSON .00 O'SULLIVAN .00 O'SULLIVAN .00 BROWN .00 OLSON .00 .00 KNAPP .00 .00 ANDREA .00 PFLEIDER • 00 ZWICKE .00 JUNDT . 00 MORRISON . 00 B 29 1790 SHADYHOOD RD29 1428 BALDUR PARK RD29 774 TONKAWA RD2C 22CL 01 4099 HIGHWOOD RD01 1375 PARK DR01 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 01 2780 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 3500 BAYSIDB RD 01 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 1685 CONCORDIA ST 02 30 LUCE LINE RIDGE 02 1006 WILDHURST TR 02 995 WILDHURST TR 19 3440 SHORELINE DR 24 950 NORTH ARM DR 24 4166 HIGHWOOD RD 24 2943 FARVIEW LA 24 1945 FOX RIDGE RD 24 380 RUANN RD 16C 16C SI 13 3440 SHORELINE DR 13 3340 SHORELINE DR 13 3340 SHORELINE DR 13 2477 SHADYWOCD RD 1C 4C sw 01 348 WESTLAKE ST 01 1650 NORTH FARM RD 01 85 CRISTOFORI CIR 01 3500 BAYSIDE RD 01 2820 DEER RUN TR 24 511 FERNDALE RD N 6C 6C UD 01 1075 TONKAWA RD 22 1400 BRACKETTS POINT 22 3510 BAYSIDE RD 3C 3C 84C 95/10/16 OR-007433 95/10/12 OR-007442 95/10/20 OR-00746795/10/11 OR- 95/10/13 OR- 95/10/17 OR- 95/10/25 OR- 95/10/26 OR- 95/10/30 OR- 95/10/30 OR- 95/10/10 OR- 95/10/11 OR- 95/10/26 OR- 95/10/17 OR- 95/10/03 OR- 95/10/09 OR- 95/10/23 OR- 95/10/27 OR- 95/10/27 OR 007436007443007455 007477 007479 007490 •007491 -007429 •007435 -007481 -007457 -007408 -007427 -007473 -007484 -007485 95/10/05 OR-007418 95/10/06 OR-007421 95/10/06 OR-007423 95/10/13 OR-007447 95/10/09 OR- 95/10/18 OR- 95/10/19 OR- 95/10/19 OR- 95/10/25 OR- 95/10/06 OR- 007426 007458 007462 007463 007474 007419 95/10/11 OR-007434 95/10/13 OR-007444 95/10/25 OR-007476 368259473428282639414211247223162972330827809091 24432921 29332521 24738403 24922121 24720805 29335636 28241626 25872779 27397766 29337200 24738403 24738793 24738793 00000000 00000000 00000000oooooooo 24’’24959 54734300 54791762 54734300 57237155 54718151 OOOOOOOO 17867711 OOOOOOOO C 6 M HTO & AIR OF PRACTICAL SYSTEMS KLEVE HTG b ACCOPPIN PLBG DOUG LINDEN INC PLUMBING SERVICE CENTER SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG THOMPSON PLBG DAY EARL W k SONS VALLEY PLUMBING CO. INC. ALS MASTER PLUMBING DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV. LAKE HARRIET PLBG k HTG TEK MECHANICAL SERVICES NORDWALL K k ASS^C CULLIGAN DAY EARL W k Syj, '■ CITYVIEW PLBG b » ’G CITYVIEW PLBG b .IG WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE HAYES EXCAVATING SULLIVAN'S UTII.ITY SERVICE CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC PETERSON ELMER J CO KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST 2,139,940.98* 01 Residence 2402Addition2503Garage/Attached 2604Garage/Detached 2705Porch2806Deck2907Fence3008Gazebo31 09 Pool 32 10 Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 34 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Hove 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined 9999 LOCAL USB CODES Undefined Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal ZD, MOV l/"l995, 3:34 PM PAGE 1•JMBRXCAL LISTING ERMIT NBR ISSUED OCTOBER 1995CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPAI4Y OWNER LAST NM VALUATI(»iR-007340R-007370R-007399 R.007403 R-007404 R-007405 R-007406 R-007407 R-007408 R-007409 R-007410 R-007411 R-007413 R-007414 ’R-007415 )R-007416 )R-007418 )R-007419 )R-007420 )R-007421 )R-007423 )R-007424 )R-007425 )R-007426 )R-007427 JR-007428 OR-007429 OR-007430 OR-007431 QR-007432 OR-007433 OR-007434 OR-007435 OR-007436 OR-007437 OR-007438 OR-007439 OR-007440 OR-007442 OR-007443 OR-007444 OR-007445 OR-007446 OR-007447 OR-007448 OR-007449 QR-007450 OR-007451 OR-007452 OR-OC7454 OR-007455 OR-007456 OR-007457 OR-007458 95/10/13 N 95/10/04 N 95/10/02 N 95/10/02 N 95/10/03 N 95/10/03 N 95/10/02 N 95/10/05 N 95/10/03 N 95/10/04 N 95/10/05 N 95/10/06 N 95/10/04 N 95/10/10 N 95/10/11 N 95/10/05 N 95/10/05 N 95/10/06 N 95/10/06 N 95/10/06 N 95/10/06 N 95/10/09 N 95/10/09 N 95/10/09 II 95/10/09 N 95/10/09 M 95/10/10 N 95/10/10 N 95/10/13 N 95/10/10 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/11 N 9?/13/ll N 95/10/11 N 95/10/11 N 95/10/12 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/12 N 95/10/12 N 95/10/13 N 95/10/13 N 95/10/13 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/13 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/16 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/17 N 95/10/10 N 2485 2575 565 1790 2700 1385 2450 1699 950 3700 26C1 3005 2655 1945 137 5 2685 3440 511 1200 3340 3340 1200 3100 340 416f 3043 30 3095 3460 3050 1790 1075 1006 4099 1115 1670 2630 35 1420 1375 14 00 2405 2470 2477 950 615 4330 3u 2605 1410 1400 1645 3440 1650 THOROUGHBRED LA 01THOROUGHBRED LA 01LEAF ST 01 SHADYWOOD RD 01 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 CHERRY PL 02 COUNTRYSIDE DR 24 NORTH FARM RD 02 NORTH ARM DR 24 TOGO RD 11 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 29 CASCO POINT RD 29 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 FOX RIDGE RD 02 PARK DR 02 PHEASANT RD 29 SHORELINE DR 13 FERNDALE RD N 24 TONKAWA RD 29 SHORELINE DR 13 SHORELINE DR 13 TONKAWA RD 02 RIDGEWOOD CIR 11 WESTLAKE ST 01 HIGHWOOD RD 24 CHERRY AVE 02 LUCE LINE RIDGE 02 BAYSIDE RD 24 LYRIC AVE 06 WATERTOWN RD 09 SHADYWOOD RD 29 TONKAWA RD 01 WILDHUR5T TR 02 HIGHWOOD RD 01 COX FARM RD 01 SHADYWOOD RD 02 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 09 HACKRERRY HILL 04 BALDUR PARK RD 29 PARK DR 01 BRACKETTS POINT RD 22 THOROUGliBRED LA 01 DUNWOODY AVE 04 SHADYWfJOD RD 13 DAKOTA AVE 15 MINNETONKA HOLD LA 11 NORTH SHORE DR 29 LUCE LINE RIDGE 02 WAYZATA BLVD 19 CHERRY PL 24 BRACKETTS POINT RD 01 SHADYWOOD RD 11 SHORELINE DR 19 NORTH FARM RD 01 155902511559025114752622 37862341 34203677 00000000 30711717 14732221 27397766 00000000 14724118 00000000 15590251 19301139 00000000 36332561 00000000 54710151 35453797 00000000 00000000 34282826 17294420 24724959 29337200 35220475 24720805 39414211 00000000 19332255 36025947 00000000 29335636 24722316 14358443 11710390 15429000 00000000 34202826 29723300 17067711 15590251 14749602 00000000 00000000 19300150 00000000 36332561 14724300 15375995 27009091 00000000 25072779 54734300 EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC JAMES W BRUCE HOMES CORONADO STONE HEATING fit COOLING TWO A-ABC APPLIANCE fit HEATING STONEHOUSE DESIGNS NORDWALL K fit ASSOC CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. EIDEN CONSTRUCnON INC RKIERSON CUSTOM HOMES FIRESIDE CORNER PETERSON ELMER J CO M H SEIFERT CONST PRACTICAL SYSTEMS ED SHERIDAN ENTERPRISES WESTONKA MEr CONTRACTORS CULLIGAN SILVERNAIL MARK ALS MASTER PLUMBING KLEVE HTG fit AC CUSTOM POOLS INC C fit M HTG fit AIR OF BUFFALO DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV. COPPIN PLBG FEATURE BUILDERS H1167 KEN ROELOFS CONST INC DALPHIN POOL fit SPA PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DOUG LINDEN INC KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC REED GARY EIDENBRUCEURBAN EIDEN JAMES GRANDE PERKINS OLSON MCMILLAN OLSON DOTZENROTH PEAK ROOFING FIRESIDE CORNER UPWARD BOUND DESIGN fit CONS T.R. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION PLUMBING SERVICE CENTER TEK MECHANICAL SERVICES SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE KIRKMAN MURPHY MAXSON OSMONSON PFLEIDER BUTCHER O' SULLIVAN O'SULLIVAN BUTCHER CASHIN OI.SON RUMSEM ANDERSON LEINTZ KELLEY MITTELSTAEDT HARRIS URBAN ZWICKK WAADE SERAN KIELLEY DEVOR WAGMAN ROTH MURPHY JUNDT EIDEN LUECK BROWN OLEN WILE STBLOW LEINTZ WILBUR JUNDT HARVEY OSMONSON 272,100.00273.000. 00340.000. 00 1,000.00 6,000.00 900.00 2,781.30 83.000. 00 2,800.00 1.500.00 14.000. 00 20.000. 00 4.500.00 8,000.00 5,000.00 2.300.00 .00 .00 1.200.00 .00 .00 200.00 5.840.00 .00 95.60 2.400.00 4.800.00 3.100.00 3.456.00 10,000.00 300.00 .00 100.00 4.500.00 208,500.00 80,000.00 15.000. 00 9.800.00 400.00 950.00 .00 1.200.00 10.000. 00 .00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3.000. 00 1.000. 00 9,000.00 2.900.00 4.500.00 129.00 200.00 .00 4b •NOV 1. 199S, 3:34 PM PAGB 2UNBRICAL LISTING BRMXT NBR ISSUED OCTOBER 1995CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OmER LAST NM VALUATIONNEWMAN2,000.00KEZAR9,800.00KNAPP.00.00GEYEN1,575.00BROWN5,000.00KEZAR3,450.00FISHER1,500.00NEILSON546.000.00AHLERS9,000.00ANDREA18,000.00CREAR4,400.00REBSTOCK500.00 ANDREA .00 DARLING 8,240.00 MORRISON .00 9,500.00 SIVER 800.00 BANGERT 14,000.00 LAVERE 5,000.00GOETTEN31,500.00DUNKLEY30,000.00KIRKMAN1,100.00SCnUMACKER5,000.00SWENSON750.00 1,250.00 STODDART 324.00 PALM 6,500.00 800.00 JAMES 1,500.00 R-007459R-007460R-007462R-0074S3R-007444R-007445R-007466■R-007447'R-007468•R-007449R-007470)R-007471)R-007473•R-007474 iR-007475 •R-007476 >R-007477 )R-00747i )R-007479 )R-007481 )R-007482 JR-007483 )R-007484 )R-007485 )R-0074B6 OR-007488 OR-007490 OR-007491 OR-007492 OR-007496 H4C 95/10/19 N 95/10/19 N 95/10/19 N 95/10/19 N 95/10/19 N 95/10/20 N 95/10/20 N 95/10/20 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/24 N 95/10/20 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/23 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/25 N 95/10/26 N 95/10/26 N 95/10/27 N 95/10/31 H 95/10/27 N 95/10/27 N 95/10/30 N 95/10/30 H 95/10/30 N 95/10/30 N 95/10/30 N 95/10/31 M 1655 BOHNS PT RD 14 1474721830506TH AVE N 06 1522616385CRISTOFORI CIR 01 547917623500BAYSIDE RD 01 547343001155LOMA LINDA AVE 11 000000002673PHEASANT RD 03 0000000030506TH AVE N 01 00000000774TONKAWA RD 29 39414211340NORTH ARM LA 01 154473332109SUGARWOOD DR 06 177807522965DEER RUN TR 01 389400053701SHORELINE DR 19 355749002943FARVIEW LA 24 247384032020DEER RUN TR 01 57237155 3405 CRYSTAL BAY RD 11 18238046 3510 BAYSIDE RD 22 00000000 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24432921 1973 FAGERNESS POINT RD 01 34702452 3500 BAYSIDE RD 01 29332521995WILDHURST TR 02 282416261385FOX ST 04 147190222709WALTERS PORT LA 29 14703908194 5 FOX RIDGE RD 24 24730793380RUANN RD 24 247307933020NORTH SHORE DR 01 34789558 2380 SHADYWOOD RD 20 34745026 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24730403 1605 CONCORDIA ST 01 24922121 160 TRUFFUI.A TR 01 36332561 1385 CHERRY PL 29 00000000 MOE EDWARDNCXINAN CONSTRUCTION INC HAYES EXCAVATING SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICEKLEVE HTG 6 AC ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES PRICES CONSTRUCTION 6 REM BURNSVILLE HEATING CO THERMO-DYNE INC DAY EARL W 6 SONS CLOVER HI LI. COMPANY INC SELA ROOFING SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG SCHERBER f, SONS INC THOMPSON PLBG LAKE HARRIET PLBG H. HTG GERMAIN CONST UNLIMITED C A SMITH INC CITYVIEW PLBG 6 HTG CITYVIEW PLBG 6 HTG DITTER INC MESSENGER EXCAVATING INC DAY EARL W 6 SONS VALLEY PLUMBING CO. INC. FIRESIDE CORNER u ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED oREPORT RBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/95 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONODAKir!G* - _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _* «r « * •__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DDPVTPkMC PAGE t 1REQUESTER: CAROLE PERMIT TYPE QtY 10/01/95 - BASE FEE 10/31/95 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY 10/01/94 - BASE FEB -- - — - -10/31/94 VALUATION PLAN RBVIBir IJser Defined SUBDIVISION 1 400.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 4 850.00 0.00 0.00 5 950.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 2 450.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 2 700.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 2 €25.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub'total 11*2,675.00*0.00* 0.00*7*1,400.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 11**2.675.00**0.00** 0.00**7**1,400.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 11/01/95 •* PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/95 TO 10/31/95 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 2,675.00 2,675.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 2,675.00 2,675.00 PEBHITS ISSUED/FEES COLliECTED YEAR-TO-DATEEPORT MBR.>ATB or RUH 11/01/95PERMIT TYPE QTYf^uildina 3GL FAMILY-NER OUPLEX-NEWsF-add/remodel SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/RBMODBL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DCMOINST-ADD/REMODEL 1N8T-ACC STRUCT SF-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total 35 0 210 28 14 12 1 3 3 0 1 1 7 15 330* Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE fireplace VENTILATIONFir.L storage__ LINE INSPECT UUCT WORK ONLY remove oil tank UNDEFINED Sub-total 57 15 0 50 2 0 8 8 8 1 149* Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total 113 1 6 4 124* Sewer It Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE drnfld It/or tank SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER It WATER Sub-total 10 0 33 4 7 4 2 60* 2 2 i • • * *• t i • *-- CURRENT 01/01/95 - 10/31/95BASE FEB VALUATION PDAM REVIEW QTY81.430 0 48.625 4.477 960 3.461 529 130 331 0 72 0 230 3.037 123.205 .60 .00 .75 .50 .00 .75 .75 .00 .25 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .60* 10.762.228.00 0.00 5,039.644.00 445.200.00 0.00 455.467.00 45.000.00 0.00 17,800.00 0.00 5,000.00 550,000.00 0.00 202,405.00 17,522.824.00* 39.928.51 0.00 25.426.12 2.833.18 0.00 617.66 344.34 0.00 158.60 0.00 46.80 1,423.18 331 1S7 27 12 7 0 0 4 3 1 1 4,710 735 0 2,184 70 • 0 200 200 2B0 247 8.795 .44 .00 .00 .30 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .32* 359,481. 43,905. 0. 120.724. 3,275 0 3.350 7.065 8,650 19.000 566,250 30 00 00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .30* 7.861.22 162.50 604.50 161.25 0,789.47* 517,261.04 13,000.00 9,200.00 6,200.00 545.661.04* 350.00 0.00 3.300.00 200.00 5.950.00 140.00 140.00 10.080.00* 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 .00 . 00* 34 7 35 3 23 0 4 106* 70.00 70.00 1,500.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 2 1 PAGE: 1REQUESTER; CAROLRBASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW48.344.5015.00 25.369.00 3,064.00 640.00 612.00 0.00 0.00 1.142.50 360.00 54.00 0.00 .000.00 1,960.40 72.738.79* i. 22 300* 3,297.00 92,958.00* 0.00 67 n 6.379.80 265.080.00 f 151.250.00 0.00 28 1 •1 12 £i 1,561.25 35.000.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 420.00 237.500.00 0.00 t> 15 541.25 499.560.00 0.00*142*10,125.69* 0.00 120 8.690.12 0.000.00 0.00 D 11 2,069.00 35.000.00 0.00*132*10,794.12* 11,557.3165002,658,031 299,600 0 45,900 0 0 129.240 29.800 2,600 0 0 355,040 15.070.835 .00.00.80 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* 490. 14. 10. 101. 1, 2. 0. 9. 16. 39. 694, 612.84 661.00 200.00 739.16 150.00 000.00 065.00 535.00 010.00 925.00 698.00* 505,956.69 0.00 0.00 400.00 586.356.69* 1.190.00 245.00 3.450.00 200.00 16.800.00 0.00 280.00 22.155.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 70.00 39.00 0.00 1,200.00 31,424012.376 1.883 0 169 0 0 322 234 35 1,211 0 283 94 0 2 49 .03.00.73 .06 .00 .65 .00 .00 .08 .00 .10 .93 .00 .46 .04* 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 • 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 Permits issued/fees collected YEAR-TO-DATE:PORT MBR. BPRMTISS^l ,TB OP RUN 11/01/95 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGEi 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE01/01/95 -- - - - - -10/31/95:rmit type QTY BASE FEE VALUATION •MPORARY 7 270.00 0.00 ib-total 11*410.00*1,900.00* Ire (REWORKS 3 150.00 0.00 (RE SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0.00 :b-total 3*150.00*0.00* ler Defined AND ALTERATIOi;15 780.00 3,000.00 REE REMOVAL 5 150.00 0.00 ETAININO WALLS 1 100.00 0.00 AWN SPRINKLER 10 350.00 0.00 ONING REVIEW 1 30.00 0.00 ub-total 32*1,410.00*3,000.00* rand-total 709**152,920.39** 18,639,636.22** -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 10/31/94PLM REVIEW QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0.00 5 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*8*259.00*1,200.00*0.00* 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 187.50 15,000.00 0.00 0.00*1*187.50*15,000.00*0.00* 0.00 10 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 89.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 11 385.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*27*1,194.00*4,500.00*0.00* 72.738.79**716**127,683.31**16,380,590.49**49,940.04** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE 21?,006.24 l?EPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 ')ATB OF RUN 11/01/95 REPORT TOTAL MASS FEB 152,920.39 PLAN REVIEW 72,738.79 •SURCHARGE 9,104.70 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 •”.AC 5,100.00 INVESTIGATION 3,564.75 UEPOSIT 0.00 'iAIL IN 50.00 182.35 PERMIT TOTAL 243,610.98 « • * * «PERMIT FEE REPORT •* CITY CF ORCNOFROM 01/01/95 TO 10/31/95PLUMBING8,7*9.470.00283.670.000.000.00 0.00 57.85 SEWER 6 WATER 10,080.00 0.0026.500.000.00100.00 0.00 9,202.75 9,130.99 10,206.50 •* PERMIT FEE REPORT *• CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 10/31/95 USER 1,410.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 4.50 1,504.50 I I PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLSSIGN410.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 FIRS150.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 u ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED "XEAR-TO-DATE uREPORT NBR. EPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 11/01/95 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO t « * * *PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE PERMIT TYPE QTY 01/01/95 - BASE FEB RANGE . . . . . 10/31/95 VALUATICW PLAN REVIEW QTY . . . . . . PREVIOUS01/01/94 - BASE FEE RANGE . . . . . 10/31/94 VALUATION PLAN REVIEN User Defined . SUBDIVISION 15 6,815.00 0.00 0.00 12 9,275.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 50 10,200.00 0.00 0.00 46 9,075.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 15 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 16 2,650.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 9 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 3 600.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCB/CUP 8 2,875.00 0.00 0.00 6 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 3 1,175.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 APPEAL 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 101*25,890.00*0.00*0.00*84*22,700.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 101**25,890.00**0.00**0.00**84**22,700.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/95 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 10/31/95 * « t 4 * BASE FEB USER 25,890.00 REPORT TOTAL 25.890.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 25,890.00 25,890.00 ■i PAGE; 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE . • 9 1995 tICAP or COiTUCT CITIES Minnetonka leach Plan Review Irspectlons Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Revlewa No. Inapectlons 0.00 135.00 25.00 160.00 0 9 1.075.43 45.00 25.00 1.145.43 1 3 143.35 105.00 25.00 273.35 3 7 32.20 45.00 25.00 102.20 1 3 816.56 75.00 25.00 916.56 4 5 210.92 135.00 25.00 370.92 2 9 4.525.71 885.30 120.00 120.00 25.00 25.00 4.670.71 1,030.30 2 2 8 8 665.92 45.00 25.00 735.92 2 3 1.028.96 135.00 25.00 1.188.96 3 9 410.06 So/.So 3.059.23 5,134.77 1,177.89 3,446.30 2,175.89 1.856.92 9.384.35 960.00 250.00 10.594.35 20 64 30,757.7i