Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-25-1995 Council Packet
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of September 11, 1995 p , *V P.ARK CO.MMISSION COMMENTS - Richard Flint Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3. ^1921 Mary Ulrich, 1000 Loma Linda Avenue - Subdivision - Final Plat Approval - Resolution * 4. #2020 James Bruce, 565 Ijiaf Street: A. Vacation of Drainage Easement - Resolution B. Final Subdivision - Resolution 5. #2058 Ron Rantz/Autografs, Inc., 2525 Shadywood Road - Commercial Site Plan Review MAYOR/COL^CIL REPOR1 ENGLNEER REPORT 6. Request for Payment #3 ^ 7. Request for Payment #5 Old Crystal Bay Road Brown Road Nonh CITY ADMINISTR.\TOR’S REPORT 8. Schedule a Lake Use Committee Mto; 'g CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*9.) LICENSES (MO ) BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AMD EVENTS 09/22 09/25 09/26 09/27 10/02 10/03 10/09 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/16 10/18 10/23 10/24 School 12:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Orono Hockey 7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. Neighborhood Sewer Meeting 7:00 p.m. Park Commission 7:15 p.m. Public Information Meeting - Bracketts Point Residents 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. School Board 7:00 p.m. Orono Hockey Association 7:00 p.m. Joint Work Session - Council/Planning Commission/Park Commission 8:00 a.m Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. Highway 12 Policy Committee 5:30 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. Public A ttendance Meeting D ate 7- -^/r. 9/j sT C ouncil Plant ^ing Co\»nssioN Park C ommission Other Please ull out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR ?^TV1BER 1. St • 3. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER II, 1995 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor ^ Callahan, Jr., Council Members Charles Kelley and Johllen Hurr Council Members Gabriel Jabbour and J Diann Goetten were absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Public Works Director John Gerhardson. Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, .Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaf&on, City Engineer Gleim Cook, and Recorder Sherrv' Frost The meeting was called to order by Mayor Callahan at 8:25 p m. r»l) CONSENT AGENDA Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda, .Aves 3. Nays 0. ^APPROVAL OF MINUTES (•«) REGULAR xMEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1995 Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of August 28, 1995 Ayes 3, Nays 0 PARK CO.V1 .MISSION COMMENTS No representative of the Park Commission was present PLANxNING COALMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commissioner Dale Lindquist had no comments PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#3) i!H980 A&T DEVELOPMENT, 460 PARK AVENUE - VARIANCES REQUEST TO A.MEND ACCESS PCAN - RESOLUTION #3595 The applicant was present Mabusth reported that the original access was approved via the unimproved 30’ right-of- way on Park Avenue Staff never considered Tonkawa for access as it is the general practice of the County not to approve a new curb cut. However, the County has given their approval for a realignment of the drive ii MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR ORONO Cm’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,!1 «rw%r (#3 - #1980 A&T Development - Continued) Council asked the Public Works Director, Gerhardson, if this application meets with his apfM'oval, wliicfa h docs. Kelley moved. Hurt seconded, to approve Resolution #3595 for the request to amend the access plan approved tor Application #1980 on December 12, 1994. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#4) #2036 ROBERT J. GOUNTANIS. 1098 LO.MA LINDA AV ENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3596 Mr. Gountanis was present. Mabusth reported that the Application originally was for a detached 22'x22' garage with a principal structure of 26 x33 5’, which was revised at the directive of the Council, who suggested a tuck-under garage with a reduction in the building pad The amended plan calls for the garage to be partially fucked into the structure. The budding pad is reduced but a new 7 ’xl 1 ’ addition has been made to the building pad. This addition is for a single story entrance area with a closet and access stair to the upper level. The garage is shown with a upper level Hurr questioned the second level of the garage. The Planning Commission did not want u two-story garage at its present location because ol its proximity to the public right-of- way and the structure being near the lot line. The amended plan shows the structure moved away from the lot line and the right-of-way Mabusth said the side setbacks have been changed and the structure is now shown at 12' from the public right-of-way and 31 ’ from the lakeshore Hurr inquired under the issues for consideration #3 regarding whether the relocation of the garage minimizes the impact of a second story The elevation of the property with the structure will be lower than that of the neighbor resulting in less impact of looming over one another The applicant said the house also sits closer to the street than the neighboring home Hurr moved. Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3596. Ayes 3, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCILMEETING HELD ON SEPTExMBER ll fAy A^jr,(#5) #2039 WALLY CARSON/ORONO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. 3010 SOMERSET LANE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3597Mabusth reponed that the property is in the Old Crystal Bay Road addition. The application involves the excavation of 1650 cubic yards of fill for a 6' depth pond The property is Nvithin the rural zoning with on-site septic and house pad The Engineer has asked that the top soil be retained and placed on the disturbed land to restore the natural vegetation. Mabusth noted that the Planning Commission was emphatic about the pond maintaining a natural look. It is located in the middle of a type I wetland, which is not suppose to be altered. The Mn/’DOT 250 mixture is recommended. Hurr asked if the resolution noted any etfect on a fiiture owner if they would desire to mow the area. Mabusth said the mowing limitations will be noted on the chain of title as well as in the resolution. There are also covenants on the property regarding protection of type 1 wetlands Mowing will not be allowed within 10* of the pond area Mabusth said the type 1 wetlands cannot be moved or disturbed Hurr asked what material would be used around the house Mark Gronberg said 2' of black dirt with clay underneath would be used in the lawn and the clav under the grass areas. Mabusth noted that the Corp of Engineers permit will stipulate the the drainage from the residence cannot run back to the pond area. Silt fencing will be used to prevent this from occurring The owtier was present and confirmed that the conditions were understood and was agreeable with the resolution. Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3597 for a conditional use permit. Ayes 3, Nays 0 (#6) #2045 JOHN STEINMETZ, 1155 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3598 Mabusth noted an amended survey has been done to show the traveled road and the right-of-way The application requires setback variances from Willow and South Brown Roads The Planning Commission had asked that there be at least 45’ from the traveled right-of-way but the amended survey shows it to be at 42* The proposed addition is to be 8* from the side lot line but also includes a 6’ covered roof deck w ith no ov erhang, which would be 2* from the side lot line and 44* from the traveled road and 48 6* from Willow Drive Mabusth said the Planning Commission recommended the structure not exceed the 15% allowable lot coverage The proposal was onginally for 16 3% coverage and is now amended at 14 2% There is no problem with hardcover though the property is subject to the shoreland area controls. The property is also subject to the 50* setback on three sides as it is a comer lot requiring a rear lot line of 50*. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 (U6~ #2045 John Steinmetz - Continued The applicant was present. Hurr inquired if the County had the adequate right-of-way. Mabusth said the County did have the adequate right-of-way with 66', adding that most of the road is located on the east 33' Mabusth said Dave Zetterstrom from Hennepin County was unable to give any minimum setback from the road but did say the distance from the traveled road was adequate. Callahan noted that an adjustment was made at the Planning Commission regarding the size of the porch. Mabusth said the porch was to be 8' with 10’ at the roof line with a 2* overhang and located at the 0' lot line. Hurr moved, Callahan seconded, to approve Resolution #3598 (#7) #2048 JAMES & JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3599 Scott Crawford of Kraus Anderson Construction represented the applicants Mabusth reported that the application is for a third residential unit in the oversized accessory structure tor a studio apartment, which already contains a 3-bedroom, 2-level, caretaker unit and a 2-bedroom guest house The one room studio will bnng the total bedrooms to si.\, all of which w ill be ser\ ed by one septic system The application was approved by the Planning Commission with conditions placed on the septic systems The sewage system was to have been updated by the 1995 construction season. A petition for sewer is under consideration The Planning Commission has asked for septic testing every two months If failure is found, the system must be pumped out on a reuular basis Limitations would be placed on the property should this fail. Kelley asked if StafFknew where the septic tank was located. Mabusth said they did, and it has been found not to meet the separation required Tests have been conducted to show there is adequate area to serve the usage. Kelley asked what would occur it the MUSA line is not extended to this area A new septic system would be installed. Mabusth suggested stipulating a deadline date for installation of septic should the MUSA line amendment fail Callahan asked if the applicant agreed to update the septic in the original resolution .Mabusth said this was true Callahan said no deadline should then be needed Hurr asked what kind of septic was on the site at present. There are two mound-type septic systems, one for the main residence and one for the accessory structures. Four septic sites were tested. Hurr asked if it is realistic to have six-bedrooms within the accessorv structure, and Mabusth said it was. MINirrES OF THE REGUL^iR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 (#7 - #2048 James & Joann Jundt - Cominued) It was noted that this is the sixth application by the applicants. Caflahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3599. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#8) #2050 WILLIAM TOLES, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE RESOLUTION #3600 The applicant was not present but was represented by the realtor for the property. Gaflron reported that the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances. The property was subject to a variance application in 1988 The current hardcover calculations match that which were approved in 1988 The proposed pool would be 115’ from the shoreline. The average lakeshore setback is defined by the house to the northeast, and the house on the west, which is set back. Gaflron said there would be no impact on these neighboring homes The hardcover calculations shows 33.1% e.xisting in the 75-250' zone, where 25% is allowed, and is proposed at 32 5®/o The reduction in hardcover will be acquired through the removal of 1390 s f of landscape fabric and plastic and 400 s.f of concrete and wood patio. The pool was looked at as structure The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application with reductions as noted in hardcover. The applicant was asked to reduce more hardcover if this w as possible. Hurr said she .saw no problem with the average lakeshore setback but saw no hardship to add to the structural hardcover Hurr asked if there was anywhere to reduce the amount of hardcover Gaflron said any further removal would aflect the house or driveway. It was noted that this application was for a hardcover variance only, not a structural coverage variance The structural coverage is at I l°'o with the proposed pool GatTron said the review of hardcover and structure was made due to the issue of non-structural versus structural hardcover issue with landscape beds and plastic underlayment. Hurr asked for clarification of the reduction of non-structural and decking by 400'. GatTron said the reduction is from a patio 2’ above grade. The 400 s f in patio would be in exchange for the 1500 s f pool. There is a net reduction in non-structural hardcover of 137 s f with the removal of 1390 s.f of plastic and fabric. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER II, 1995 (#8 - #2050 William Toles - Continued) The driveway area was discussed. It had been reduced from 1988 Part of the driv eway is on an easement and any removal would require approval by the neighbor It was included in the calculations In order to compare the hardcover amounts with the calculations of I v >. If the amount were taken out, it w ould show a favorable impact, since 50% of its area is hardcover The other drivew ay is needed to gain access to the detached garage. Callahan said he was at the Planning Commission meeting where consideration was given to the problems and voted 6/0 in favor of the proposal. Hurr said she was concerned with the width of the driveway. Mark Gronberg commented that most of the driveway was in the next zone, the 75-250' The 0-75' and 250-500' zones were well under the allowable. It was noted that the pool was set back 115 ’ from the lake and would provide a buffer. Kelley moved, Callahan seconded, to adopt Resolution #3600. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#9) #2051 MICHAEL HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT, 2760 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION #3601 The applicants were present. Mabusth reported that the preliminary plat application was foi 14-Ioi plat of the former Rosch property located at Old Crystal Bay Road and Watertown Road in a rural residential zone requiting 2-acre minimum lots. .All of the lots meet the 2-acre minimum as well as the width to the rear of the 50' street setback. Suitable soils have been found for the principal and alternate septic sites with a 6% or less slope for mound systems. There are type 1 wetlands within lots 3 and 4. very similar to the previous Carson application. Covenants w ill be required for protection of the wetlands and ask that if any alterations are made to the land, the permits would be received from federal agencies prior to making application to the City The grading plan shows a retention pond Drainage would be treated prior to entering the wetland by a retention pond located between lots 2 and 3 The drainage would travel along lots 3 and 4 to the wetlands, draining through a culven into the type 1 wetland. .Mabusth said the applicant has also granted trail easements extending to the north on the west side of the property along Old Crv stal Bay Road A 10' easement is located on the lower portion of the property and extending to 15' lurther north. The trail will be installed by the City The Park Commission has asked that the area of trail be deducted from the S'*/© amount of land allowable for Park Dedication and the rest in cash in lieu of land mbsutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 (#9 - #2051 Michad HilbeJink/John Vogt - Continued) Mabusth said there is an issue of ttv'O drain outlets on the east side of the property by the Peterman Addition and directed along the lot line to Old Crystal Bay Road. The outlets serve no function and can be closed according to the Engineer. The access for three lots will be served by private road, writh lot 4 to the south by e.Kisting curb cut that served the original house. It was noted that it a new road were put in on the east side, it would create 4 thru lots in the Peterman addition and j thru lots in the current proposal with a lot surrounded on three sides by a road It was determined to be best served bv an internal road, one reason of which to move around the forested area Hurr asked about two alternate septic sites shown in a stand of trees. Hilbelink said a secondary site was in the stand ot trees with the principal, halt in and halt out He noted that if a road were to be located to the east, it w ould be difficult to find two alternate septic sites. Hurr asked about the 10 ’ and 1 5‘ easements. The first 200 ’ would be adjacent to the road, according to Cook, due to the wetlands on the property The 15’ would be required to stay out of the tree line It was noted that the easements were already granted for the trail The trail will be built this month. The value of the acreage would be deducted against the 8®"o park dedication Hurr moved. Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3601. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#10) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - V ARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3602 The applicant was represented by architect. Greg Frazee. Gartron noted that the application is for a number of variances The original proposal was for an addition located 23 ’ from the lake The Planning Commission was not in favor of the addition. An amended proposal was presented for a new house located at the 75’ setback line with a 10 ’ deck encroaching the 0-75 ’ zone The proposed new garage was proposed at a central location, which would meet setback requirements. Hardcover was proposed at 10 l°o in the 0-7S' /one. 1 l®o in the 75-2.’^0' /one. and at 6(^/o in the 250- 500' zone The Planning Commission saw no justification in encroaching the 0-75' zone with a deck and asked for the house and deck to be moved back out of the zone The side setback was to change from 10 ’ to 0 6 ’ It was noted by the applicant’s architect that any change in the house width would adversely affect the room sizes Gafffon reported the present proposiil shows the house out of the 0-75' zone with hardcover at 35^o in the 75-250’ zone and at 60% in the 250-500 ’ zone. A new reconfiguration of the driveway eliminates a large portion of blacktop Hurr said she saw no hardship for a side setback variance. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 1L 1995 (#10 - #2057 James Nystrom - Continued) Fra/ee said the home was designed as an understated cottage with an upper master b«lroom and bath With the narrowness of the lot, the applicant wanted a low profile. It the house were to be made narrower, it would recjuire a second story design. Frazee said this would not be in keeping with the neighborhood. Hurr voiced concern with the house height changing in the fijture if this proposal were approved. Hurt said she was concerned with the drip line trom the proposed residence. 1 he code requires a 10* separation with a maximum allowed 1*1/2’ encroachment ot an overhang in the 10* setback. The proposed residence shows a 9 5* setback and 2.2* overhang, which would bring the roof drip line closer to the side setback line It was noted that the neighbor’s home to the south sits on the lot line as wxll as the garase It was said that a new home would be anticipated in the fijture on the f «i to the north. Kelley said he agreed with the need to meet the side setback and maintain the house out of the 0-75* zone. Kelley said this would require the house to be I* narrower on each side with the overhang. Hurr said this design requires more land than the lot provides Frazee said the owner took steps to make improvements on the lot by proposing a new house. Hurr noted the old residence "on average" met the 10* side setback. Callahan questioned this conclusion, opining that it was belter to move farther in than 1 6' as presenllv located on one side Hurr said it was her opinion that the side setback should be met as well as no e.xceeding of the M/2' overhang allowable Callahan noted that the house was moved out of the 0- 73’ zone. GatTron asked if the footprint to the house were to change, if the Council would like to see the application again It was detennined if the design met codes, met the side setbacks, met the 30~ hardcover requirement, and was out of the 0-75' zone, the Council would approve the application Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3602 with amendments as noted. Ayes 3, Nays 0 (#11) #2033 DONALD & ARLENE KIELLEY. 1670 SIIADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3603 Mr Kielley and contractor. Jerry Roelofs. were present. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER II. 1995 (#11- #2033 Donald & Arlene KJelley - Continued) During recent review of application by the Council, it was recommended to move the accessory structure out of the right-of-way An amended application is presemed moving the structure 9.7 to the east, 2.6' from the County lot line The structure is 3-1/2' from the accessory structure requiring a separation variance The structural coverage is now increased 1% by the moving of the structure to 19%. Paving has been removed to reduce hardcover. The rear set back remains the same. The side setback has improved by 2- 1/2'. Hurt moved, Callahan seconded, to approve Resolution #3603. Callahan noted that although he voted against the resolution at the last Council meeting along with Council Member Kelley, 3 of the 5 Council .Members were in favor of the amended proposal, and would second the motion to move the matter on. Ayes 2, Hurr, Callahan, Nays I, Kelley. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT There was no Mayor/Council report. ENGINEER REPORT City Engineer Cook had no report Kelley asked Cook to try to save the trees on Watertown Road during the bike trail construction Cook said the only trees which would be lost would be in the marsh area. CITY ADMINISTR/VrOR’S REPORT (#12) ADOPTION OF PRELIMINARY 1996 Bl DGET, RESOLUTION #3605, AND TAX LEVY, RESOLUTION #3604 Callahan moved. Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3604 approving the 1996 collectible tax levy' at 52,080,840 Ayes 3, Nays 0 Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt Resolution #3605 to establish the proposed 16% General Fund Expenditure Budget at 53,347,7.55 Ayes 3, Nays 0 It was noted that the proposed tax levy showed an increase of 3 17% but reflects a decrease in the estimated actual rate of tax in the City I he tax capacity rate was reduced from 15 064^ 0 to 14 843% If the value of a home were to remain the same from one year to the next, the Citv taxes on that home would decrease. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER IL 1995 (#13) ESTABLISH TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING DATE AND TIME Callahan moved. Hurr seconded, to set the initial Truth In Taxation public hearii^ for 7 00 p m , Wednesday. November 20, 1905, at the Orono council chambers, and to set the reconvened hearing, if required, for 7:00 p m., Wednesday, December 6, 1905, at the Orono council chambers, wth the final hearing at the December 11, 1995. meeting of the Council Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#14) LETTER OF LNTENT TO PURCHASE TWO POLICE SQUADS Council acknowledged that the purchase of two police squads was in the 1996 budget and previously discussed. Hurr moved, Callahan seconded, to approve the letter of intent to purchase two 1996 police squads Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#15) SCHEDULE PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING REGARDING BRACKETTS POIIST CUTiVE ROADW AY IMPROVEMENTS Callahan said it was his opinion that there was no need lor a public hearing on this issue, but will acquiescence, if it is the consensus of the other members to have a public information meeting Kelley and Callahan are against the road improvements along Bracketts Point Callahan said only an overlay was needed. Hurr suugested dates for the hearing of September 26, 27, or October 3 or 4. Moorse win contaa Jabbour and Goetten to determine a date and will make proper notification to the public. (*#16) EXTENSION OF MOR.\TORIUM REGARDING PRIVATE DRDTWAYS - ORDINANCE #141. 2ND SERIES Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Ordinance #141, 2nd Series, an ordinance to extend the moratorium established in Ordinance #1.>8, 2nd Series, prohibiting the granting of preliminary subdixision approval or other pennits and approval for private driveways which serve three or more residences Ayes 3, Nays 0 (#17) PARK BENCH PI RCIIASE Huir moved. Kellev seconded, to authorize Jason Christensen to build and install six park benches at a cost of S330. to be appropriated from the Park Fund, with a budget adjustment of the same amount .Ayes 3. Nays 0 Callahan asked Stall to convey the City ’s thanks and appreciation to the Boy Scouts, and in particular. Jason Christensen. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER IL IW5 (#17 - Park Bench Purchase - Continued) Hurr received Gerhardson’s acknowledgement of satisfaction with the design of the park benches A letter of recommendation will be sent to the Boy Scouts. Callahan asked that the local newspapers be notified of this endeavor, and Hurr asked for pictures to be sent to the press (#18) ESTABLISH DATE FOR OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE PUBUC HEARING A public hearing concerning the off-sale liquor license application will be conducted at 6:45 p.m., October 23, 1995, prior to the regular City Council meeting. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Barrett had no report. (•#19) LICENSES Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the following licenses Ayes 3, Nays 0. Gambling Permit Resolution #3606 Multiple Sclerosis Minneapolis Chapter at Jimmies Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Special Event Permit Parade of Homes Stickney & Schwartz Builders Inc. 2905 Deer Run Trail September 9-24 Weekdays 3-8 p m. W'eekends noon-6 p m Brico Development. Inc. 1205 Lakeview .Avenue September 9-24 Weekdays 3-8 p.m Weekends noon-6 p m. (•#20) BILLS Hurr moved. Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, Navs 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER Jl. 1995 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p m Edward J Callahan, Jr., Mavor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk 12 CCv/; CnyREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 20. 1W ITEM NO.: O Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffrca Title Assistant Planning Sc. Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zonine Item Description: #1921 Mary Ulrich, 1000 Loma Linda Avenue - Final Plat Approval Resolution I ist of Exhibits A - B - C - D - Final Plat Resolution Copy ot Final Plat Drawings Assessor's Fair Market Value Determination Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution No. 3556 The City Council adopted preliminary plat approval Resolution No. 3556 on May 8. 1995. The plat drawinss indicate compliance with the retjuirements of Resolution No. 3556, including. Dedication on the plat of a drainage easement over the wetland, and granting of a conservation and flowaee easement over said wetland. Dedication of standard drainage and utility easements along perimeter and interior lot lines. Dedication on the plat of 25* of right-of-way for Loma Linda Avenue. Dedication on the plat of 33* of right-of-way for County Road 151. The City Assessor has placed the fair market value of Lot 1. Block 1. the new building site, at $45,000. The Park Commission indicated no trail easement is necessary, and has recommended the standard 8% park dedication fee amounting to $3,600. which has been paid. The remaining conditions of approval per Resolution No. 3556 include; To avoid excavation in the wetland, the existing house sewer connection shall be relocated to Loma Linda Avenue, and the new house on Lot 1 shall use the existing southerlv stub at County Road 151. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 September 20, 1995 Zoning File #1921 ___ . The driveway entrance for Lot 1 shall be on Loma Linda Avenue at a location to be approved by the Public Works Director. - Although the City shall not be party to the view easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2, the location and extent ot said easement shall not be revised from that proposed without notification of the City. The above conditions are noted in the final plat approval resolution. Staff Recommendation Finding that the applicant has completed all requirements for final plat approval, statf recommciKis approval of the plat of "Ukeside Heights" per the attached resolution. COL^CIL ACTION REQUESTED: PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by . to adopt Resolution No. granting final approval for the plat of Lakeside Heights for Mary Ulrich at 1000 Loma Linda Avenue. Vote:aves.nays. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF LAKESIDE HEIGHTS FILE NO. 1921 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and w •* WHEREAS, the City ’ Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Mary A. Ulrich thereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, on May 8, 1995, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3556 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 1000 Loma Linda Avenue; and WHERE AS, the property is located within the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of one acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. Each of the proposed lots meets the required one acre dry contiguous land area. Lot 1 being 1.27 acres in dry buildable area and Lot 2 being 1.10 acres in dry buildable area; and WHEREAS, the Orono Comprehensive Plan requires only 33' of right-of-way for County Road 151 and therefore the City will require a 33' right-of-way dedication for County Road 151 . Further, 25' of right-of-way will he dedicated on the plat for the north half of Loma Linda Avenue; and WHEREAS, due to the proposed dedication of right-of-way for Loma Linda Avenue, the existing house within Lot 2 will remain at its existing location 33.0’ from the right- of-way line where a 35.0' setback would normally be required. The Council finds it is appropriate to grant a front setback variance to accommodate the existing house; and WHEREAS, wetlands have been delineated in the northwesterly quadrant of proposed Lot I, and a conservation and flowage easement has been granted over said w'etlands; and Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the property was assessed for two sewer stubs and two sewer units as part of the Forest Lake Sewer Project. The only connection fee due for sewer for new Lot I will be $225.00 per the 1995 Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the existing sewer connection from the house on Lot 2 crossing proposed Lot 1. will be abandoned and the existing house will be reconnected to the sewer in Loma Linda Avenue. This leaves the existing stub at the southwest quadrant of Lot 1 available for sew’er connection serving the house to be constructed on Lot 1 , and WHEREAS, the property owner proposes a view easement across the southerly 90' of Ia)t 1, allowing merely a driveway in that area. Such easement leaves ample area w'ithin Lot 1 for construction of a single family residence meeting required setbacks; and WHEREAS, access for Lot 2 will remain on Loma Linda Avenue. A new access driveway for Lot 1 shall be located on Loma Linda Avenue, location subject to approval of the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS, drainage on the property can easily be dealt with at the time a new house is constructed, within the standard perimeter and interior drainage and utility easements; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 is subject to the standard park dedication requirement; and WHEREAS, Lots 1 and 2 have been found to meet me standards of the LR-IB Sincle Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, and a residence can be developed within Lot 1 without the need for any variances; and W'HEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of the requirements of Resolution .Vo. 3556. Dedication on the plat of rights-of-vvay for County Road 151 (North Arm Drive) and Loma Linda Avenue. Page 2 of 4 r. 3.Dedication to the City of a flowage and conservation easement providing for limitations on the use of the wetland described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easement". 4. Payment to the City of final plat legal review and filing fees of S200.00. 5. Payment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of $3,600.00. NO\V» THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV ED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Lakeside Heights. Hennepin County. Minnesota, and grants a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow the existing residence to remain in its current location 33.0' from the front lot line where a 35.0’ setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing house sewer connection shall be relocated to Loma Linda Avenue, and the new house on Lot I shall use the existing southerly stub at County Road 151. 2. The driveway entrance for Lot 1 shall be on Loma Linda Avenue at a location to be approved by the Public Works Director. 3. While the City shall not be party to the view easement over Lot I in favor of Lot 2. the location and extent of said casement shall not be revised from that proposed without notification of the City. 4. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono w ith the Hennepin County Recorder ’s Office on or before March 25, 1996 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copy of the conservation and flowage easement document. The approval eranied by this resolution shall expire it the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to tile a new' application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 25th day of September. 1995. Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Doroihv M. Hallin. Citv Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Acting Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day ot September, 1995, by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said iastrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary' Public Pace 4 of 4 Mayor 1 day of September, Clerk of the City of m behalf of the City. #I lit 1- A1 o \ Vu A y'}i •I cuI ± \0 4 CL J ^ I'l ] .. '•- * *!l i•ji! IJ I I \« ) H \ Iw (* Vs 1 1 rO 1 ‘ * ‘Ji I ii a. 00cc Ul >cc i i UJ Oz Cftr UJmzocco z u!u-oo c GITYof ORONO Municipal OfTlca Strait Address: 2750 Wley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Malllni Address: P 0. Bo* 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 August 30, 1995 An Aurancl Burnet Realty 315 East Lake vS,reet Wayzata, MN 55391 Re; File 4^1921, Mary Ulrich Subdivision - Park Fee Dear Mr. Aurand; On July 13 the Orono Park Commission determined that no trail easement was needed at the Ulrich location and recommended the City require a park fee in lieu of land. The City Assessor has established a Fair Market Value for the new lot at $45,000. The Park Dedication Fee is 8% of this amount, or $3,600, due at the time of final plat approval. As I have received the title opinion from Kenneth Schivonc, the subdivision will be scheduled for final approval by the City Council upon receipt of the mylars from your surveyor and the easement documents as required in Resolution #3556. Please contact me at 473*7357 if you have any questions. Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Plannimj & Zoning Administrator cc; Marv Ulrich, 1000 Loma Linda Ave., Mound, MN 55364 end. Telephone (612) 47.V7357 • FAX 473-0510 I rt ■! ft tH • ■ r Y a t /OO''CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 556 Y resolution■ .^proval of .a two lo ^lat for the property located at ^00 LOMA LI>DA A^TINL'E . FILE NO. 1921 A T-1 ih-r-inafter the ■’aopUcani"). on March -5. 1994,^ WTIEREAS, Mary A. Llriuh nnnroval of a two lot residential plat oi pfop.mT.tllv rattich^Vhercnafter the ’propeny*); an.1 ' U-HERE.AS. :ther due 0™u"s Statutes 46:.35S et. seq. and the '°"°g ,994 4, which tune all persons destrtng to be WIEREAS. at TO^Lg^he ftnowing°pXgs ot Council considered the subdivision appliwation Ua . ^ a fh.> IR IB single faniilv lakeshore residential The prcpertv- is located within the LR , ccntisuous dry buildable land zoning district requinng a minimum ot 1 acre or ccnu, within each newly cieated lot. The ." aTL‘’tcaX“™acfot'tL' proposed 'restdetat.al lots .and area as follows: Lot 1 = 1--*^ acres dr>' buildable Lot 2 = 1.10 acres dry buildable. TK* Loma ttnda Avenue is 50 ’. ;;:^Str„c^"ly :?• -vul be dedicated w.thln ..be proposed Ptat. Due to the proposed dedication of nSbuof-way tor Loma *= extstin? house wUl remain at f The CouncU tads it whe-e a -5.0 ’ setback would normally be requir . existm® house, ^pp^pnat; to grant a front setback vanance to accommodate the ex.st.c. 1 Page 1 of 6 VM >u CITY of ORONO RE50LLTIO.N OF TIIF. Cm’ COl NCIL VO a s fi__±. 3. weiiands. 6. 1 win be S225.00 per die 1995 tec schedule. T,.. c.is..ng «..v„ conr.cuo„ fron, -j;-J---!n w,n b. aband, n.d and :he quadranc of Loma Linda Avenue. This consmicied on Lot Lot 1 available for sewer conaeciion b^rving tne nous. I. TTie pKT=n> ^.".^e-rar ^uch eas-ment leaves L3e''atea wiihin propo'sed Lot 1 for construction ot a single tamily residence meeting required setbacks. Access tor Lot 2 will remain on Loma Linda Avenue. A for S 1 shall be located on Loma Linda Avenue, local,on suoject to approval of the Public Works Director. ■« :rKiS s;.rres 'S.n.r=ii; easements. 11. 12. Lot 1 will be subject to die standard park dedication requirements. .All lots have been found to meet the standards of *= iakeshore residential zoning district, and a residence ^an P proposed Lot 1 without the need tor any variances. vnvv THFRFFORE be it resolved , that based upon one or more of t^ .^.dings^noted*abov.^heCi.;^^^^^ ?Qqs'‘bv’Mai‘rs.°Gconberg of Coffin and Gronberg. Inc. and grants a variance to Page 2 of 0 ^*r• SilCi >1*0* T o\ - tl CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COL^CIL xn 3 5 5 3 1. 2. j. 4. The 3FFli=“t ^hall gnn. econsen at.on tlowage easement over *e des.snated wcilands within the plat. Smedard dramage and u.U.ty easements shall be dedicated along pertme.er and intenor lot lines. Applicant shall dedicate on the flat ;5' of right-of-way for Loma Lmda Avenue. Applicant shall dedicate on the plat 33’ of right-of-way for County Road lil. A sewer connection charge of 5235.00 wtll be due with the bu.lding permit for Lot 1. „ fh.. u.-#*riird the existm? house sewer connection shall be s »- - 1 *■< e.xisting southerly stub at County Road LI. The driveway entrance for Lot 1 shall be on Loma Linda .Wenue at a location to be approved by the Public Works Director. proposed without notification of the City. ‘f'' “ rr s" s;;: “ final plat submitt .als ^ The following list of fmal submittals must be submitted to the “"'J® ‘°s two weeits pr.or to the reralarly scheduled Council meeimg on the second of the month: 1 Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200 ’. Drawings to include: Page 3 of 6 8. 9. f«« vxn o*ttO CITY of ORONO RESOLUTIOiN OF TTTE CITY COinSCTt NO. 3 5 5 3_____ .A.. B. c. D. E. Lot lines platted per preUminars iuney_by Coffm and Gronberg. Inc. dated September 4. 1991 revised .4pnl ... 199.. Dedication of -drainage and ut.lity easements' 10' wide along all petteter property line^ and i' each stde of internal property lines. Designation and dedication of a drainage easement located within Lot 1 as delineated by Jonn L. Ance.son or Dedication of 33’ of right-of-way for County Road 151. Dedication of 25’ of rig.ht-of-way for Loma Linda .Avenue. Legal documents required: .A. B. D. Title oDinion addressed to the City. .411 owners, mortgage holders or Lets with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and al. Other documents artected by such interest. The applicant must provide certified copies or all recorded easements currently affecting the propert}'. Sisned and executed consen ation and tlowage easement over the wetland. Please refer to standard easement language enclosed. (To be determined by Park Commission) Signed and executed trail easement, location and legal description to be determined. Fees to be paid; Total due: S-CO.OO .A.Sul iivisiomeasemeats filing fees = S200.00 ,-TTv 'r r *rr*'iitriMU t. u'J f .ic*. 1 w VV'VV • I • I « .A.'-. “•1 “i.rf u'A w'Uit ■out CHECI'i J C• V V * ‘.A .*.t* w.' C V ft V V A.'A .\.* « V' ft V / iVVx I ■ia. v/s'5- Paae 4 of 6 I m «• t ■V CITY of ORONO RESOUmON OF THE CITY COTNCIL NO.3 5 5 3 B -Park Conimission sbsll review park dedication requirements for this rrcr TPii mav i?ark fee in lieu of lands. The Lii> Assessor will ^rKked to determme'' *e fair market value of the undeveloped lands within the subdivision (Lot 1) so that a park dedication f« J’' determined This tee mav be adjusted if acquisition ot a bi>.e. trail easement alone Councv Road 15 1 is required, .\ppiicant will be advised "rsoon as thi Cits' Assessor has submitted his determination ot tair market value. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a tegular meetmg held this Sdi day of May. 199o. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. P; ( Edward J. Callahan; Jr., .Mayor i/ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on *is 1995 bv Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy .M. Hailin. Mayor ity .er' ..... jt ..^g Or!no a Minnesota mumcipal corporation and said insmiment was execmeu on Cirv.0 iV LINDA S. VEE notary piac- HOWEPW COUNTY My Commission bdWB J»i 31. JOOO /■ Notarv Public / Page 5 of 6 <r»Mn hatt- All ll»at ran of Iho Soulhcaat Oiurler of tlie UortlveaBt (Jtarlor of Suction 7. Tuwn;.Iii\. 117. l{fln,*c :;.j. .loncribud uo ful- •O 'S o loue:« BefllnnlnA n » I«lnt on tho Saoi Hn« of the NorUioaut Quartor of oald StcUon 7 dldUnl 832.5 foal Horth.of the Soulhoaat corner ojf paid Uorthoaot Q»iortor of SucU.m 7; U.oncu Mortli aloiul Iho Eaut lino of the llorlhoatt Quartor of oald Section a dlatumc of 313 00 foot; theiKv l^at iy.ralltil with the North lino of thu Southoaot Quorlo, of U.o lloi tlu.nnt Quarter of oald Section a dloUnce of 331.6 feet to tl.o actual i^jlnt of hctlnnlua of tho 11 ' # \\ ^ hereinafter doocrlbod; thence Wo«t alonu u.iId lino i-arellol with the North lino of tlie SoutheSet Quarter of the Northeaat Quarter of Section 7 to I lie conler line of tlie County Road Irunnlng through eald Northeast Quarter of Section 7; thence Souih- caaterjy nlong the center line of aald County Hoao to a loint 032.5 feet North ♦ of U.o South line of the Northeaat Quarter of aafd Section 7; thence Eaet ivuallel with tho South line of aald Northeaat Qiaarter to a lolrit dletanl 33fi.9 foot VIoot of thu Kant lino of oald Northeaat Qinrtor of Geotlon 7; thence North to the ectu.il loint of hei'lnnlm;. a aThlo ehould read: North an ipoeimrud along tho Eaot lino of aaid Southeanl Quarter of the UUrlhcaal (Em, le, . # Thla aur/oy ohowi the location of an extatlng houoo in relation to the ulxiv,- doflcrlbed vroreriy. It dooa not imitiort to rhow any other iiii-roveoitnln or oncrodc)iiiionld. 1-*o t 0 • CO Vl C/l Oi T> :fc^' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION fyt,, DATE: September 14. ' /■ •''ITEM NO.; Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: <t2020 James Bruce, 565 Leaf Street A. Vacation of Drainage Easement - Resoluticn B. Final Subdivision - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Preliminary Plat Resolution B - Final Plat Resolution C - Vacation Resolution D - Final Plat of Fox Hollow At the time Council granted preliminary approval of the 3-lot subdivision members also conceptually approved the vacation of the drainage easement within proposed Lot 1 . It was recommended that fonnal action on the vacation be delayed until the tinal plat is approved and a new drainage easement dedicated over the drainageway. The enclosed resolution approving the vacation has been drafted per the conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. The applicant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary' plat approval. In addition applicant has provided all the necessary submittals and payment of fees. The plat resolution has been drafted per the pertinent findings and conditions set forth in the preliminary plat resolution. COL^CIL ACTION REQUT:STED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed resolutions approving the vacation of the drainage easement within Lot 6 Block 1 of the Stielow Addition and approval of the 3-lot plat known as Fox Hollow. i tn u N I < U IV t)V.w 4> I, O*cji ij |r. S •j tj *•%u 2 p •» 13 ? o* o C- u 5 rl •*t> “•XJ Ko o 2 o "u *“ f8| Is!w f E •• u ^ C !• O t) * o r-i ti•«»* c^ r: o P 6 G < UJ h; V -j ir' - S1,1 C4 5-H ^ £ V i«v> "o tE 8 5? t) X.so VI O fc I?.. to %/ C. t. f . ^ ^ t V %i '• 4 . 1* ** U «t o ^ Vn « ?! c o 5 «cr «/i V m Z §c 2 8 :jv> 8 < -j cf I ? c t t (i o g'- s. n f S“f 15 c 8 9 t u X£ OT S § 2 < o <■'* b o •? —i u: C Ca o ^8 •ifi8 P m £ h- 0.UJo 3 s g •* 8” ?5 •• tJ %S o «• >' V) XI X- b t. I xj ?<n 5ll O X K Ou. vt*« ocr It 9 Po 0 rc %'r> C- b <r 1 X. M bEuu p Or «ic c 2 §g i Is ®P C a «> « E " s x; x> 3 O* r>4 n •’ ? 8 1' ? ^ F E C o ^ U «f x: t/t Xuo lO *« 10 in n 11 ^ ro 5 ^ . »o C E " 10 u c u ~ C C %} 3 *1 2 fi VE «i •I tf £ V I V w5u « t c 0 1 I. tn r •o c «ou I U c O13 touo U >• 10 T1 vl’B r .« *"2 B 41 ^ fi ^ 8 b CD % = 1a V ? f ? s2 I O UJzo to >-5 0, 5ou zo u D X /)z Q O UJu D GC (D 5 S Ul Z I o Ko !!>e U ! D Oo u I Oz o tt:o o &u u. O z D O o (BP n 2 m c «i V ti n I I I £►s> & u I w ff fi I8 i ]► « E 2 is<x: dS 0 1 K O ^ Ul m 'S b ,i l! 'J i u. in UJ SI a $ U) 6 Ui Ol I I ! I u i -■? oSQ Q oi. d n mt % o o X !». • ou t/1 m o») I . U K J50S 96 a /*. L t «Jc.VCX)OI« •V,r ^N « Tt>V, •i? <tN 2 1.0? u, I * /• L*«0 « L____ ')<) /./ M l.* ^t; rN)n X ; 7 !:;! / *% IVlo1 * - 1 1 LL t ^ J 1 jS I I J “ ? A I'/ » » / •'/ '/-V » - 1 I > I , . I I I . *. . I f > / ' ' . V . / » ' I t V ) I' I - - I 1-^1 t j * ~y^ r . . - _ J •1/ l-l. I Ui i ll) 2—i m 4 TT-| ' i I 2- I -I ii “» •* I & I 5 s I z $o « Q n in t <o 3s 'Sfi|l tI • • • J A M F. S W .iSrucc n o M t N Auq 30. 1995 \» V. Jeanne Mdbust.h City O'f Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P O Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55o2o Dear Jeanne, October !• I a» tioping to h-ve all l°kno-'soma detail work :r;no:L:re;L;v:vor;‘:ra?Lrne..-.aV net get acco^pl leded in ti.e ai t r 1-n^r^ IS a city ordinance wnich would keep me from You informed me that -f^ere i . . Completion time of this getting a permit before , need to ocrupy the home by Mar. 1, 19^6, ,,en,e la crucial to .r.e “bs Ind because we intend to tci meet tne tHO-year-reolacemenw preview, a vital marketing event enter this home m the annual Spring ,-revitrw, for us. 1 .Udueet tnat tt.e city ia.ue me - ?;e°e:er‘’ ■ uitr. all proper elans, surveys, etc., ^ course, eould ie::r.c^ral; ^00^0:0"toc^airon^^^uTd be I'n compliance ultn all setbacks, eti:. , on t«itr plat. Thanks <or your help ncercly ?.n, Bruce JD:bk I0')3 H. Wav/ala Blvd., ,Suite 223, Wav/aia, .\!iniu*s.)ta 55391 (til2) 475-2022 FAX (612) 475-302«j NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition ot James Bruce and John McCoy is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and that the drainage easement leealiv described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the condition that upon vacation, applicant shall rededicate the drainage easement within the plat of Fox Hollow. Adopted by Orono City Council of the State of Minnesota, at a regular meeting held on September 25, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoine instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of Seoiember. 1995, by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrament was executed on behalf of the City. Nota.ty Public Page 2 of 2 • J A RESOLUTION VACATLNG A DRALNAGE EASEMENT 0\T:R LOT 6, BLOCK 1. STIELOW ADDITION RLE NO. 2020 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on April 21. 1995. James Bruce and John McCoy filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting tt'*? vacation of a drainage easement originally dedicated in the plat of Stielow Addition legal!. desenbed as follows: The drainage easement ov<r» f. Block 1. Stielow Addition as dedicated in the Plat of Stielow Addition. Henn^ ..^'y. Minnesota; and WHEREAS, after di- . ubiished and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on May 15. 1995 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and coasideration. the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposed vacation and the Council of the City' of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in the consideration of the following: 1. The current drainage easement does not accurately define the 34 ’ wide drainageway that intersects the property. 2. Portions of the dedicated drainage easement as it currently exists would serve no public purpose. Page 1 of 2 3.The existing residence stmcture on Lot I niay never be used as a second residential unit or guest house as property does not meet the area requirements for a guest house located within the LR-1A Ukeshore Residential zoning district. 4.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the He^epin Countv Recorder’s Office or the Registrar of Titles Ottice on or betorc March 25, 1996 together with a certified original copy of this resolution, covenants an easements noted above. The approval wanted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been by date specified above. In that event it will be necessary to I lie a new -'PPl'^bob with the y of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 25th day of September, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) The forecoine instrument was acknowledged before me on 1995 bv Edward'J. Callahan. Jr., and Dorothy M. Halim. Mayor and City Clerk Orono,' a Minnesota municipal corporation and said imstrument was executed on behalf of the Citv. Notary Public Page 3 of 3 5.Dedication on the plat of a 15’ utility easement that will provide private sewer service to Lot 3. The easement is located within Lot 1 and along the shared lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 for a distance of 101.48’. 6.The subdivider has created an amendment to the private covenants for the Stielow Addition addressing the obligation ot Lots 1 and 2, Fox Hollow to share in the maintenance and upkeep ot Oxford Road. 7. 8. Pavment to the City of the park dedication fee in the amount of $16,000.00. Payment to the City for $48,450.00 for two sewer units ($24,225.00 for each unit based on 1995 fee schedule). 9.Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount ot $200.00. 10. Pavment to the City for $175.00 for the final plat application. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Fox Hollow', Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1.The existing drive that e.xtends through Lot 3 to the cul-de-sac witliin Lots I and 2 shall remain while existing residence structure on Lot 2 is occupied. No construction vehicles shall be allowed to use the existing to gain access to Lots I and 2. A*1 access for new construction on Lots I and 2 shall be from approved driveway entrances at Oxtord Road. Future owners or developer shall provide detailed engineering plans and specs for the extension of municipal sewer to Lot 3. Plans shall address the connection to the municipal sewer line and repair of Oxford Road per City Engineer’s report of Mav 3. 1995. Page 2 of 3 __... A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF FOX HOLIT)\N FILE NO. 2020 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corpt)ration organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision reeulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a Class III subdivision of a 3-lot plat by James Bruce of Bruce Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation, hereinalter (the subdivider); and WHEREAS, on September 25. 1995, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3574 approving the preliminary' plat of 3 lots and a lot w idth variance for Lot 3 at 2" based on the unique findings and hardships set forth in that resolution. The subdivision has been found to meet all other ^standards of the LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3574, the resolution that granted preliminary approval of the 3-lot plat. 3. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Dedication on the plat of a 20 ’ wide drainage easement over the drainagew'ay that intersects Lot 1. Dedication on the plat of a 15’ utility easement within Lot I that would provide future sewer e.xtension to the propenies to the immediate east. Page 1 of 3 o\m* >T CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 5 7 -1_____ D Payment of $48,450 for two sewer units ($24,225 for each unit based on 1995 fee schedule) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of July, 1995. ATTEST; Dorothy JyfT iTallin. City Clerk ward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayoi>^ STATE OF NANNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The forecoina instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1995, bv Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & C.ty Ckrk of the Ci^ of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf o e Cirv. l’\uAS.1 \ / >—•,CTASYPLBLlC-f.-NN'SO"A ^ HENNEPIN COUNTY | ' y/ A. Notar\' Public / . A / / w. Pace 5 of 5 ai CITY of ORONO ■■ Ip:RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 5 7 4_____ A.Lot lines platted per preliminar>' survey by Ted Kernna of Sdioell and Madson, Inc., a licensed surveyor, dated April 20. 1995. B.I^cdicalion of "drainage and utility easeinents' 10’ wide along all perimeter property lines and 5’ each side ol internal properly lines. C.DesienativMi and dedication on the plat ot I'OX Hollow of a 20 wide drainage easement over the drainageway tliat intersects Lot 1 . D.Desienation and dedication of a 15 ’ wide utility easement within Lot 1 for future sewer connection to church property. E.Utility (sewer) easements along shared lot lines of 1 and 2 to extend 10’ on each side of the internal property line. Ix'cal documents required; A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting tlie property. C.Applicant to provide an amendment to the private covenants for the Stielows Addition dealing with the obligation of Lots 1 and 2 to share in the tnaintenance and upkeep of Oxtord Road. Fees to be paid; Total due; $4S,825* A. B. C. Final plat fee = $175.00 Lecal review and filing fees = $200.00 *Park Dedication Fee shall be based on Assessor's determination of the fair market value of the property at its undeveloped state. Please note that park fees will only be required for two of the three lots as a residence exists on one of the lots. The subdivider will be notified as soon as the Assessor has made his recommendation. Page 4 of 5 A o. o 1 CITY of OROXO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 5 7 4 ^ _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLN ED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for James W. Bruce at 565 Leaf Street per the survey dated April 20, 1995 by Ted Kcnma, a licensed surveyor, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to execute an amendment to the original maintenance agreement for the Stielows Addition dealing with the obligation of Lots 1 and 2 to share in the maintenance and upkeep of Oxford Road, a private road of the City. 2 Designation and dedication of a 20’ wide drainage easement over die drainageway that ititersections Lot I as shown on the preliminary plan. 3. Existing drive that extends from Lot 3 and cul-de-sac within Lots 1 and 2 shall remain while guest house on Lot 2 is occupied. When the use of tlie residence is complete, then western extension of drive and cul-de-sac shall be removed by developer. No construction vehicles on Lots 1 and 2 shall be allowed to use existing drive. All access for new construction on Lots 1 and 2 shall be from approved driveway entrances at Oxford Road. 4. Future owners or developer shall provide detailed engineering plans and specs for the extension of municipal sewer to Lot 3. Plans shall address the connection to the municipal sewer line and repair of Oxford Road per engineer’s report of May 3. 1995 . 5. Subdividcr has agreed to remove the accessory structure on Lot 3 prior to final plat approval. Existing residenre structure or guest house on Lot 2 may never be used as a second residential unit or guest house as property does not meet requir *ment of LR-IA Zoning District. 6. .Applicant to dedicate 15 ’ utility easement on the plat for future sewer extension to il'.e church propeny to the immediate east. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and founh Mondays of the month: 1.Record plat draw’ings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200’. Draw'ing to include: Page 3 of 5 ■ ■■,r‘ CITY of OROXO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3574____ 3. 4. / . The proposed plat contains three lots each meeting the required minimum tu’o acre area requirement. Section 10.55, Subd. 15 (A-2) as property is sewered, the drainage area within the propertj ’ can be credited as dr> buildable area tor density credit. 5. A two inch lot width variance shall be granted for proposed Lot 3 based on the following findings: A.Developer has been unable to acquire additional lands from church property to the immediate north. B Per Section 6 (A-2) existing lots of record that are greater than 1 acre and serv’ed bv public sanitaiy' sewer may be utilized for single tamily detached dwelling purposes if Council finds that: (1) It is at least 1 acre in size and the average width of a lot is at least 100’. (2) It is ser-ved by public sanitary sewer. (3) The lot otherwise meets the requirements of Zoning Chapter or other applicable City codes. C. No other variances to lot standards are requested. D The two inch deficiency would have a negligible impact on the placement of a residence on this property. 6. .All three properties are located within the Metropolitan Urban Service .Area. .All lots will be setwed from an existing municipal sewer line within Oxford Road to the immediate west of the property ’. All lots can be developed with new residential construction without the need of any variances to the lot standards ot the LR-IA Zoning District. There is adequate capacity within the sewer lines adjacent to the property to support two additional units. Page 2 of 5 T i CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.8 57 A RESOLUTION GR.\NTLNG PRELIMINARY .APPROVAL OF A THREE LOT PLAT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 565 LEAF STREET - FILE NO. 2020 WHEREAS, James W. Bnice. on April 21, 1995, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot residential plat of property legally descnbcd as: Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition. That pan of Lot 2, Block 1. Klitzke .Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies easterly of the following described line. Commencing at the southeast comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 2 a distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be descnbed; thence Nonh 19 decrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 155.00 leet an said line there teminating. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter the propert)’"); and WHEREAS after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statmcs 462 '58 and ihe City of Orono's Zoning and Planing Codes, ihe Orono Plannin'^ Commissi-m held a public hearing on .May 15. 1995, and June 19. 1995. at uhich tin.e all persons desiring to be heard concerning this applieaiion were given the oppominily to speak thereon; and W IU--REAS. at their reeular meeting held on July 10. 1995. the Orono City Councl considered die application of James W. Bmce. noiing ihe following findings of fact: 1 The oropertv is located within the LR-l.A Single Family Ukeshore Residential ZontL Dtsnic. requirtng a minmium of two acres of land within each newly created lot. 2. The properu' contains appro.ximately 6.(XX)6 acres. Pace 1 of 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Septei^^l4. t§95. ITEM NO.: 0 •'xy Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2058 Ron Ramz/Autografs Inc., 2525 Shady wood Road - Commercial Site Plan Review Zoning Districts: Refer to Exhibits D and F. Lots 1 and 2. Leach Addition is zoned B-4. . Total area of commercial property = 62,500 s.f. (deduction of 6,000 s.f. for access easement to Lot 3, Leach Addition is no longer required since residential development of Lot 3 is not planned by fumre owner and properties will be legally combined). Required = 20,000 s.f. Lot 3, Leach Addition is zoned LR-IB, Ukeshore residential. Required area = 43.560 s.f. or 1 acre Existing = 3+ acres. Brief Review of Application This application was reviewed at the August 21. 1995 meeting of the Planning Commission. Applicant received unanimous approval of the commercial site plan as amended at the meeting. The Planning Commission increased the net floor area and called for three additional parking stalls (originally shown 64, amended 67). The applicant proposes construction of a two stor> olfice facility to house the corporate headquarters of Autoerafs Inc., a company that designs and prints graphic decals with 3M technoloay for uses on automobiles, trucks and other vehicle application. The facility will house a national/reeional computerized graphic design center, computerized Film printing of those graphics, shipping and storage facilities and corporate administrative offices. The facility will be for the exclusive use of the Autografs company. The Planninc Commission was concerned with the possible noise or odors that may be omitted from this operation. Applicant advised that there is no noise nor will odors be omitted because of the nature of the operation as the operation calls for a controlled internal environment. The loading dock is located within the interior at the lower level, because of the need to control the temperature. Applicant wanted the Plaiming Commission to note that this is not a showroom sales operation. Sales are conducted through telecommunications. He advised that display units Zoning File #2058 September 14, 1995 Page 2 of 3_________________________________________________________________ will be installed in showrooms and orders placed directly into computers and transferred via modems to Autografs. Mr. Rantz advised that there are no dangerous chemicals used in the process. Any chemical wastes used in the photo processing will be stored on site and deposited at approved locations. None of the chemicr ,s w ill be introduced into the waste system. The Commission members found the use to meet the intent of the B-4 zoning district. All structures and parking areas meet the required setbacks. The Counry has approved the single curb cut to the site. An amended drainage plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Applicant ’s engineer shall work with both the City’s Engineer and the W^atershed District to complete grading and drainage plans. Note no drainage from the developed site will drain to the Kelly Avenue pond. All drainage will be directed to the east via the culvert beneath County Road 19 to the wetland areas in the .Marsh of Lafayette. All drainage will flow through a skimming device that will remove sediment betore draining to the Marsh at Lafayette drainage svstem. The original 64 stall parking plan has been upgraded to 67. Applicant had originally excluded the receiving area at approximately 1,223 s.f. from the net floor area. The amended plan. Exhibit V, reflects the increase in required parking stalls. The applicant has asked that parking be installed in stages as applicant ’s proposed level of use is estimated as follows: 25 employees. 8 business guests, 2 miscellaneous. 9 contingency = Total of 44 parking stalls. Applicant has asked to be allowed to install 44 stalls and if needed at some time in the future, he would install the total of 67. The Planning Commission approved the phased parking proposal as long as there is an executed agreement that would require applicant/owner to install the additional 23 stalls when required bv the Citv. A sprinkler system is required for the structure that contains a total of 19,168 s.f. The structure will have an elevator. SAC charges have been approximated at 7. Applicant's architect will be required to submit plans to the Metro Waste Control Commission for the acmal determination. Landscaping has been approved proposing a variety of 78 trees and approximately 1,500 other plantings. Evergreens have been planted along the west and southwest corner of the pn^perty to minimize impact year round upon adjacent residential areas. Planning Commission approved the landscape plan .as proposed. For more detail on the commercial site plan review, please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated Aueust 17 1995. rtwt][iroifl mtiict] ,i-r^ ,^l *- ’ >■ -f '► *H •» 'i .•y yL' ^•i: t . A ■ X ';* 9 I OHiTS RHUE mm \smi nnira [mm IK [•3m9} Zoning File #2058 August 17, 1995 Page 4 not rom ains ition jnue 13. Required = 9’x20 ’ Proposed = 9'x20’ No variaiKC required Section 10.61, Subd. I0<A) - Required offstreet parking. One parking space for each 200 s.f. of net fIo<3r area. Applicant’s estimate of net tloor area = 12,132 s.f.* * Areas deducted from gross area 2,446 s.f. shipping and receiving (lower level) 722 s.f. general storage (lower level) 192 s.f. rest rooms (lower level) 1,642 s.f. circulation (stairs, halls and elevators) 192 s.f. restrooms and service area (upper level) 1,642 s.f circulation (stairs, halls and elevators) Applicant has excluded 7,036 s.f of floor area, review Section 10,61, Subd. 4 (D) - Floor area. "The term ’floor area’ for the purpose of calculating the number of offstreet parking spaces shall be the net usable floor area of the various floors, devoted to retail sales, services, office spaces. prcKessing, and fabrication exclusive ot hallways, utility spaces, storage areas other than warehousing." Based on applicant's estimate of net floor area at 12,132 s.f. Required stalls = 60.6 or 61 stalls Proposed = 44 initial spaces Proposed = (34 future spaces Variances for initial proposed parking plan == 17 stalls or 27.8% Section 10.03. Subd. 17 (B) - Required loading berth. Loading berth is required for all buildings having 6,000 s.f. of floor area or more. Refer to Exhibits I and J, an interior truck dock or loading benh is included within the building. Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover within 500-1,000’ setback area. Area = 120.000 s.f. p,\\^' Prop*>*>ed = 42.000 s.t. or 35% Proposed = 16,060 s.f.* or 13.38% * Parking area = 4.8(X) s.f. Loading area = 1.160 s.f. Building &. patios = 10.100 s.f. Zoning File #2058 August 17, 1995 Page 5 Review of Use B-4 district allows for offices for professional uses and offices of general nature. Do the uses proposed by Autografs Inc. fall within the permitted uses of the B-4. Current B-4 district contains the Freshwater Biological Institute, the multi office builduig to the immediate north and the Casco Run Office Building on the south side of Shoreline Drive to the west end of the City. The maximum number of employees at the facility will be 25. The structure will be approximately the same size or footprint of the City 's Administrative Building and 1/2 the size of the Freshwater Institute on the east side of Shady wood Road. The structure will house a computerized design center, film printing laboratoiy, shipping and storage facilities and the corporate headquarters of business. Ron Ranlz plans to visit all property owners within the neighborhcx>d to review the plans, dimensional model of facility ami the operation. In early discussions with applicant, staff w'as advised that the proposed development process is state of the art equipment. Operation involves no noise nor does it admit odors. This is not a show room sales operation. Sales are conducted through telecommunications. Kiosks or display units will be installed in show rwms and orders placed directly into computers and transferred via mtxlems to Autograf. Mr. Rantz will be able to explain the process in greater detail. Planning Commission may want to review the uses listed within the light industrial zone in the code Section 10.50. Subd. 2 (A). Access to Pi 0 perty Lots 1. 2 and 3 of Leach Addition were created in 1978. Lot 3, the western lot. was to achieve access via Lot 1 along the nonh propeny line at Shadywood. A 24 ’ wide access and utility easement was created over Lot 1 in favor of the residential lot to the west (review Exhibits S and T). The County approved the shared access for Lots 1 and 3 at the northwest comer oi the propeny and Lot 2 was approved for an independent access at the extreme southeast comer. The new single access proposed to the site has been approved by the County. Staff received a call from Dave Zeitersirotn of the Hennepin DOT advising that he saw no problem with the new'lv relocated access. It is the intention of applicant if site plan is appro\cd, to legally combine all lots into one parcel. The applicant will then be required to file a vacation application vacating all interest in interior drainaee and utility easements adjacent to internal lot lines. The 10' drainage and utility easements will be retained along the perimeter of the combined three lots. Zoning File #2058 August 17. 1995 Page 6 Sewer and Water Sewer and water assessments have been paid for Lots 1 and 2 of the Leach Addition. Each lot lias been assessed tw'o sewer and two water units. Lot 3 was also assessed one water unit tor a total of five water units already paid on the three lots. Reter to Exhibits R1 and 2, sewer and water stubs are available at Shadywood Road. Drainage/Grading Gustafson ’s report of August 14th does not consider the amended pond submitted by Mark Gronberg, Exhibit Q. The amended grading plan is still incomp.ete. The engineer asks for the following: Proposed pond should have a berm along the south and east sides to prevent ovenopping. All grading must be confined to the property un ’ess an easement is obtained from the adjacent property. The pond outlet at the southeast corner is an existing 12" culvert. A skimming device should be provided within retention pond to remove sediment, etc. before draining to outlet culvert. Detail design the outlet structure, culvert kx:ation and elevation should be shown on the plan. Parking lot and entrance should have storm sewer for proper drainage. Applicant’s consultant has started the permitting process with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Parking Proposal Applicant’s parking plan. E.xhibit V. shows sixty-four total parking stalls at required size (9’.x20 ’). Based on applicant’s level of use; 25 employees S business guests 2 miscellaneous _9 contingency Total 44 Zoning File #2058 August 17. 1995 Page 7 Applicant proposes installation of fort\'-four stalls with first phase ot improvement and if needed in the future, install the remaining rwenty. Gustafson asks that pventy parking stalls in future exp ansion area should be designed and should drain to the pond. Gustafson goes on to ask for a section of the pavement area showing concrete curb and gutter for parking lot. Access should be a 9 ton design for truck traffic. Access onto County Road 19 should have a 25’ radii to allow for truck turning movements. Gustafson also notes the location of County Road 19 is shown incorrectly on the grading plan and should be corrected. Detail of retaimng wall adjacent to underground loading area should be provided. Gustafson will review the revised plans and prepare an estimate ot the total cost of the site improvemePiS to determine the amount of the letter of credit needed to ensure improvements have been installed to the City’s satisfaction. Applicant will be expected to e.xecute a developer's agreement and post the necessary security once commercial site plan review is completed by both City and drainage/grading plans approved by the Watershed District. Parking E.xcept for the need for storm sewer the parking layout meets the code requirement. 7,036 s.f. of floor area has been deducted from total building area at 19,168 s.f Should the 2,446 s.f. ot shipping and receiving area be deducted from the total building area (review Section 10.61. Subd. 10 (A) noted abW].> All other deductions appear reasonable. Applicant should provide more detail on the activities within the shipping and receiving area. Does this area include the interior loading dock/benh? If sixty-four parking stalls meet the code requirement and applicant proposes a first phase installation of forty-four based on actual parking needs, is a variance necessary as long as applicant signs off on a resolution agreeing to install the additional twenty stalls if a more intense use creates additional parking needs? Setbacks and Yard Requirements Based on the directives of the code it would appear that there are no setback requirements from a zoning boundary’ line. The code only talks about setbacks from lot lines as lots will be legally combined, internal lot lines are erased and lot exists as it did prior to the Leach Addition. Only the zoning boundaiy exists along the nonh/sruth shared lot line of Lots 1. 2 and 3. The applicant is provided more flexibility in developing a site plan now that the residential lot will no longer be developed and the 24’ driveway easement along the north side is vacated. The buildimi and parking are now placed right at the B-4 western boundary. Refer to Exhibit V, note applicant shows future parking and building expansions within LR-IB zonini! district. Unless rezoning is approved, such expansions are not legal within a residential zoning district. If applicant requires an addition ot 30 x85 in the future, then the existing Zoning File #2058 August 17, 1995 Page 8 building should be relocated further to the south. Can this site support the additional parking needed for the expanded building area.^ Applicant should provide further clarification on the need for the expansion and what type of uses would be proposed in the expanded area. Signage Applicant's site plan shows a sign at the Shady wood access. The property will be allowed a total of 250 s.f. of signage but no single sign can exceed 50 s.f. Building Plan Review Lyle Oman has completed a preliminary plan review and notes the following: 1. Proposed office building is classified as a Group B occupancy. 2. Sprinkler system required per MN State Building Code Section 1306 as adopted by the City of Orono. Proposed building is 19,168 s.f. - sprinkler required at 8.500 s.f. or more for Group B occupancies. 3. Elevator required for handicap accessibility - applicant proposes elevator. 4. SAC charges approximated at 7. Applicant’s architect is required to submit ;-!ans to Metro Waste (MWCC) for acnial determination. Landscaping Plan Review Exhibits N and O. applicant proposes the planting of 78 variety of trees and approximately 1.500 other plantings to offset existing plantings removed during the period of construction. Note evergreens will be planted along the west and southwest corner of the property to minimize impact upon adjacent residential areas. Is the landscape plan adequate.^ Issues for Consideration Before Planning Commission can make any recommendation of approval or denial the following issues must be addressed; 1 Suitability of use - Does use conform to intent cf B-4 district? 2. Phased parking installation vs. complete parking installation. 3. Adequacy of landscaping. Zoning FUc #2058 August 17, 1995 Page 9 4. Potential encroachment of grading within property to south. 5. Size of strucmre in relation to lot area (4+ acres) includes both B*4 and LR-IB properties. 6. 7. 8. 9. Future expansion needs of Autografs. Suitability of site for applicant’s needs, both current and future. Net floor area/proposed parking.r» s Any potential negative impact of proposed use upon adjacent existing residential property. What are the comments of affected property owners? Options of Action To cither deny, approve as proposed or amended or tablc.;^ ch •MO t • •✓0 , wiTS C'A t i Cmk' OF ORONO • GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION I. .-It,«a .4PPL1C.VST , ^ Phonchome)---------------------------- Nu.nie V/ATE-^*:: -3 — Address io'?‘^0 •'‘.^______ Phone (work') ^ -^'1- Oi; City ~-:^e:^ Zip -56 3 0\y>-ER (if diff««,t than ap^licanO______, Ph°“ ',wo*J i>o PJ _ \’.-^me r:Zr,kl gAN.re ;* ----7io ^ ^ Address ^<?/f u.^i<U f< o---------^ . ^ ___— —^ ''' A=^'—^-^'—^(rncnth/year)DateProperr/Acauired ---------:— --------- I (do) (ST^also own the adjacent parcels ot land. I*EES - CONDITION/VL USE PERMITS - , , „ S 50.00 For e- ch variance request with CLP application 5125.00 Residential .Accessory Use ^ 5200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) 51 75.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duple.x CrediPBldg $250.00 Commeicial/Industrial Use ” S200.00 Land .Alteration --------Grading and filling - designated wetland or flooaplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Gradmg. seawall, retaining walls within /5 ‘ ot lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule • \ S 100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) -------- After-the Fact Fee - Double Current .Application Fee ary c~ .'7C-.V0rrrrr . V OTHER applications 5200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (* consultant tees) ^ S250.00 Vacation 5175.00 Easement Vacation ~ S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision --------S300.00 Rezonmg (PUD - refer to fee schedule) 5300.00 Compre.hensive Plan Airienument ' $100.00 .Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule -•7. • • ■'/ :: "7^* present use of PROP^"^ ^ Present Zoning District j . Present Use of Property ^Az^lTR^sidential Other (specify) REQLTRE0 SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. Completed Application Form. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. _ Describe request in detail. _ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350‘ (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center. 348-3'>7n Plat Map. ’ ** . Cenificate of Surrey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for sur^ev information. , Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. . Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include mantal satus) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include rame(s) of applicants) if not current owner(s) Construction plan, if ipplicable (see suff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCL^IENTS OR COPY SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCU^IEN tI SUBMITTED. (Suff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plan;, etc to be submitted.) The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:^__________________ APPLICANT’S SIGNATL'RE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee pavment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of tins application, andeenities that the information supplied IS true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signamre Date OWNTR’S SIGNATLTtE The ow ner hereby acknowledge^ and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by f ' staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members tor purposes .^stigation anyk-r^fme^tion of this request. Owner’s signature ^ L Date- fa f ----------udie / "*o< 0 ________ AUTOGRAF’S LAND USE APPLICATION August 2, 1995 KEi rU WA'I'ERS & ASSOCIATES. INC D«'.SIGN1-;RS lUMLDF.RS 10340 Vikint; Dtivc Suite 110 Eden Prairie Minnesota 55344 (612) 943-1060 Fax 942-1058 Licen%e Number - 0001503 Autograf s Inc. proposes to construct its corporate headquarters facilit>' on the Leach Addition property. Autograph’s is a new high tech firm which designs and pnnts graphic designs with 3M film technology for use on automobiles, trucks and other vehicle applications. The proposed facility includes a national regional computerized graphic design center, computerized film printing of the graphics, shipping and storage facilities, and corporate administrative ottlces. Autografs is working together with 3M. The facility is designed specifically for the Owner’s use and they will occupy the entire facility. Imag/ . 1 corporate identity are extremely important to the firm. They will leave existing wooded buffer areas ot tlie site undisturbed and extensively landscape the entrance to the building and site, and required buffer areas. PROPFRTY USE The 3 parcels of the Leach Additions are to be combined into a single parcel for office use. All building and parking will be contained upon the original lots I and 2. Tlie existing wetland and adjacent wooded slopes on Lot 3 w ill not be altered. A new storm water holding pond will be created in the southeast area of the property BUILDING The structure will be a two level building with built as a "walkout” into a sloping site. Direct access'egress will be available on both levels. Building Area 19,168 sq. ft. Footprint Area 9,584 sq. ft. Net Building areas as calculated for parking requirements 12,132 sq. ft. An interior truck dock is included in the building. PARKING Parking required by ordiance - 63 spaces. Actual parking required by Autografs: • Maximum Emplo> ees 25 • Maximum Business Guests ® anytime 8 • Miscellaneous 2 • Contingency 9 Total 44 This proposal allows for an expansion of 20 spaces for a total of 64 Total maximum required parking is 63 spaces. The site plan is designed to set aside area spaces for 64 . A variance is requested to originally construct 44 spaces required by the buildings projected use. This will allow larger green areas for building occupants and neighbors, and less hard surface run-off. Parkin^ stall sizes are 9’ x 20 ’ per the ordinance A~i SITE PLAN The building and parking have been shifted to the north and northwest adjacent to the commercial building and as far away from the adjacent residential area as possible. The storm water holding area at the entrance will be developed as a landscape amenity. A conservation easement will be created approximately 320 ft. near setback including the wetlands and adjacent would slope. (See the site plan) SETBACKS All structural and parking setbacks exceed the ordinance requirements. BUILDING HEIGHT Average buildhg height is 20 ft.. This is within ordintmce requirements. BUILDING MAIERIALS Dn'vit and or bnck masonrv - See attached elevations. LOT COVERAGE AND DRAINING CALCULATIONS Part of the site falls vvithin the 1000 ft. Lake Minnetonka 35® o hard surtace zone. All drainage related to building and parking is directed to the holding pond and dispersed by controlled access to the Marsh @ Lafayette. No additional runotf is directed toward the Kelly Ave. watershed. Coffin and Gronberg will provide these calculations by separate letter. LANDSCAPING Most of the site is covered by a dense mass of smaller aspen, elm, boxelder and ironwood trees. Left in masses as proposed .these provide excellent visual screening. Sec the landscape plan by Bachman for supplemental planting. Mil DATt um/nIMTCH SOIMmOiMt NAKi TAKPAYCS HAHi/AOOII SMS ADOO ONKER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR * • •V • . HEIt^PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP ADDR (St^R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR M EO-1I7-2S 11 0001 OESOS LYOIARO AVE CLENDON J OLSON 9LEND0N OLSON E565 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR HN 5S351 10 20-117-21 11 0021 0254S LYOIARO AVE V H ELLIOTT TRUSTEE VALERIA N ELLIOTT 254S LYOIARO AVE NAVARRE MN 55192 10 20-117-21 11 0027 02477 SHADYHOOO RD DUANE N HALL DUANE N HALL 17005 CRESTLINE HUMBLE TX 77194 10 20-117-21 11 0030 02525 SHADYHOOO RD DEArtU H LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KErOOOD HAY NAYZATA MN 55191 10 20-117-21 11 0014 02500 SMADYHOOO RD UNIVERSITY OF MirtJESOTA REGENTS U OF M/REAL EST OFF SHOPS BUILDIMGt SUITE 101 119 15TH AVE S E MPLS MN 55455-0199 38 20-117-21 14 0002 02615 LYOIARO CIR MICHAEL L GILBERTSON ET AL MICHAEL L i KAREN G1LBERTSOI4 2615 LYDIARO CIRCLE S EXCELSIOR MN 55331 10 20-117-21 11 000402595 LYDIARO AVE PIE LENOXPHILIP A ELIZABETH LENOX RT 1MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 16 20-117-21 11 0022 02525 KELLY AVE C E I M C TROYAK CHARLES E TROYAK 2525 KELLEY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55531 16 20-117-21 11 0028 02515 SHAOYFIOOO RD DEANT4A H LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENHOOO HAY NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 11 0031 02465 SHADYHOOO RD 1ST NATL BK OF NAVARRE 1ST ?4ATL BK OF NAVARRE P 0 BOX 121 NAVARRE MN 55192 38 20-117-21 11 0038 02520 SHADYHOOO RD FRESHHATER FOUNDATION FRESHHATER FOUr40ATIOr4 725 CO RD 6 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-21 14 0003 02625 LYDIARO AVE C M HILLIAMS ET AL C M HILLIAM3 ACL ALVAREZ 2625.LYDIARO CIR EXCELSIOR m 55331 REPORT NO. PI4154Q1 PAGE I38 20-117-21 11 000702560 KELLY AVE KIRK K NELSON KIRK K NELSON 2560 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55311 38 20-117-21 11 0021 02545 KELLY AVE R H PONZETTI ABA PONZETTI ROBERT H/BARBARA A PONZETTI 2545 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR M44 55311 18 20-117-21 IX 0029 C2545 SHADYHOOO RD DEANNA M LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KErAKX)0 HAY NAYZATA MT4 55191 38 20-117-21 11 0012 00018 ADDRESS Ur4ASSIGNE0 1ST NATL BAt4K OF NAVARRE 1ST tiATL BAf4K OF NAVARRE P 0 BOX 121 NAVARRE MN 55192 30 20-117-21 14 0001 02605 LYDIARO CIR G L MALTZEr4 A B J LERVIK GARY L MALTZEN B0!t4IE J LERVIK 2605 LYDIARO CIR 0R0T40 m 55311 18 20-117-21 14 0006 02640 KELLY AVE J R A S L VOLKMAH J0lir4 R A SHERRY L VOLKMAR 2640 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR Mf4 55111 :»• # ■LM DATE ftATCN 501 HENNEPiN COUHTT PROPERTf IHFORMAUON SYSTEM PROPERTY Q»tCRS LISTONNER NAHi TAXPAYER NAME/AOm PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 0' PROP AOOR OMNCR NAME ' TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR> 58 20-117-25 lA 001802420 KELLY AVE 6XNCCR L PRITCHARO 6INGER L SCOTT 2420 RELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 5S5S1 50 20-117-25 14 0021 02507 KELLY AVE LEONORA R NITcHELL HRS 0 F MITCHELL 2507 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55551 50 20-117-25 14 0024 02425 KELLY AVE * KURT NEJEZCHLEBA ET AL KURT A CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBA 2425 KELLY AV EXCELSIOR HN 55351 PROP AOOR 0M4ER NAI« TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 501 00027 REPORT NO. PI435h01 PAGE 258 20-117-25 14 001402545 KELLY AVE EVERETT J SCHROEOER E J SCHROEOER 2545 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR W 55551 58 20-117-25 14 002002585 KELLY AVE ALEOA C BURCH ALEOA C BURCH 2585 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 20-117-25 14 0022 02405 KELLY AVE WILLIAM J STODDARD WILLIAM J STODDARD 2605 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 20-117-25 14 0025 02655 KELLY AVE J H EUGSTER ACM EUSSTER JACK EUGSTER/CAROL M EUGSTER 2655 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 22 0011 02570 LYOIARO AVE T A RYAN » P J RYAt4 THOMAS A RYAN 2 HACLYNN RO EXCELSIOR MN 55551 5S 21-117-25 22 0012 02456 LYOIARO AVE 0 W MCCUSKEY A C F MCCUSKEY DIVIO H A CW#4IC F MCCUSKEY 2656 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR MM 55551 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEUtEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATI^ 1 U) ^■ondki 4'* CD I , ! • ’I • f. • . • . ■0 • # -vV• •V = = =: h V““ / / / / / 0 (D I i Ii fii [rI II\cXmCcXrrSn 2 ->^».-•-Ok. S •* Am ,•.%">*• ^ **V. .<• *, /'••v' ii H S. xT^. >■ ':'X.- :■ P»* 4aIW4.> f U% .!n;V;H ZJLisu3a UJ q: oz q: <0. UJ «J 2 u LJ < ■■ca c/9 ca c/9 ee z 0 1 LU LU uJ■ Z Cd M 1 ‘ ' ll \\ Saimx^S: ' \N ^ N " s ''X . XW nN y 2 ’j u !H CO B B CQ Zo liJ 111 LiJ (A ca g CA Sea z 01 UJ LU m mz m lO s I w 5 t J J J > > I y u yU ini B \\ \ 0£Ssra COOB ra I \\\ '^ ' ^ i y% > ■ '4N \''■ m ■' mm \ AV r \V>I L ■v%1 vv\:r zo t LU lU ■ (/) / / y u CO zo LU LU ■ (/) J f .if-: - M’ ■ • ■ *•'•<, •*^5 •V'l k >< '<safe -'l-l .:X' ' I ^• \ ' T;. 2i. ■ * -'. •i-,1':'mm •»>-l iii. ‘'•r- j' • » »ir ^ • # f • r mm f *i - —T ,<• • ‘ : •• < ■V ' ;• I . ■ .-'55^ -*> J *.r 'y» TTSurv '-i ... ' :'.,v,vv.r ■-:: .. '- A 9/18/951 KEITH waters & ASSOCIATES, Inc. DESIGNERS & BL ILDERS 10340 Viking r>nvc Suite 110 Edcfi Prairie MN <5344 (612)942-1060 fa\ (612) 942-1058 I icense Number - 0001508 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 re; Ron Rantz Property File No. 139-2058 Dear Jeanne: We have revised the parking layout to accommodate 2 additional future parking spaces per your request, for a total of 67 One is located on the West side and one is on the East end of the future parking lot, which lies between the runoff ponds. I have sent a plan by courier to Shawn Gustafson for you. Sincerely. Blake Bichanich BB/hks End. cc; Shawn D. Gustafson, P E. Oe-21-lSSS 14:32 sia 33S 13:1 BCNEST.=ICC 6 A«=C. ^ ^ 1^1 Bonestroo g:jS Rosene Andernk& |\j| Assodates Englnetrs & Architects ;n^*f •%**•*•* .. N:f • 41 • . • t • , / V, • • *i f4i... f : - • ■< ■f • r ,»% I V->•••% *■ ^ ^ *: V.. . . • f *A . Vi-». . f •• i • A ^ -••»••«: ■• 4. r • A . ••*.■ • 4 t •*. ■ .i^«« . » . • ■* ■ •♦n".* •'.•••. • A A - ' y .« .. r ••* • \* •* « A # • •* • *4 * >4 t • m < . « • *.-1 t • « f? '• Vf.* f i¥“** M t .« « . .................I .1 ' •' . • ■■ *»• •*!.! ■* A «’• «. V ** V’«% •*• V.-« A S, I *I * ••y A Vtr** ' • A A t; •** • • • ■ .t.t *! r. •! August 21, 1995 •nr-* .- . A» # I M »• • ' A ft! •• , , M. ...» It • » 7 . .. 1 • I .» f, ‘ y * • •» ..................... • V » • *’ »»*.•••' • . , ■• «•••**••: I V I. t .. •• • / • ' . *«• r»*. *|i.i •• ♦ t. ♦ 1..* *1 * * *..* •* * .’ »• • I • • . f» V . X • ” f .. rA- *1 lAivw* . ., ••! V • I • M . .. H 7» »• I *•; I • V **.•>••• •* .••» %/% . ; • >» • < V * ••« • * 1. 4 V 1 * > .-f .V V , ••• •• Ms. Jeamie A. Mabusih Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re; Ron Rantz Property FUe No. 139-2058 Dear Jeanne. We have reviewed the revised site and grading plan for Autografs Inc. on Lots 1. 2 and 3, Block 1, Leach Addition. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. rne drainage calculations should be revised to match the revised grading plan and should include the storm sewer. The proposed ponding appears to be acceptable. The grading exceeds the 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) maximum slope and should be revised unless the slopes arc adequately stabilized. The parking expansions should be reviewed by the City prior to construction. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District should review the plans. The pavement section appears acceptable. Hennepin County should review both the replat and the access location. Additional right-of-way may be needed for C.R. 19. The retaining walls should have a draintile line installed behind the blocks. Where the walls exceed 4 fee: in height, geogrid must be utilized to .-einforce the walls. A design should be provided for walls up to ten feet in height as shown on the grading plan. The existing drainage and utility casements between lots 1, 2 and 3 should be vacated when the lots are combined. An estimate of the toul cost for the site improvements should be calculated to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, bonestroo. rosene. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. I easexes? This Esserwnt Is effecclvs ss of the d*y o* 1978, mnd Is Mds snd executed by Thones C. Leech end Ooanne M. L*.ach, husbend end wife, (hereinafter "Grantora.’*) WITNESSETH: Vhcrees. Grantors are the owners of certain reel property situated in the County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, legally de- scribed es: Lots 1. 2 and 3. Block 1. Leach addition, according to the plat thereof on file in and for sard Hennepin County., .. ^ F . ^ < i;w»,.«...'cr.ntor. h»v« agre.d .. .condition to obt.lning fln.l pUt .pprov.l froa the City o£ Orono th.t appurt.n.nt c.scoent of Ingro.o .nd egret, over and acrost Lot 1 to the benefit of Lot Ro«. therefore. Grantors hereby grant and convey a pereia- n«>t eate-ent for roadway and utility purpo... over, under and acre.. Che northerly 2* feet of Lot 1. Bloch 1. Leach Addition featured parallel to the northerly property line of Lot 1. u’oek I, ueach Addition. Ihl. eatenent Is for the benefit of and appur enant to that certain real p.-operry situated in the County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 3. Block 1, Leach Addition. The easewnt described heroin shall run with the land, and shall be for the benefit and use of the owners of Lot 3. Bloch 1. Leach Addition, their heirs and assigns. GRANTORS: U 4 ■ ■ • \ V.' I adei. - a.' V '•■fj • -. TA BBOLUnON NO. 922 A RESOLITIION APPROVING THE LEACH ADDITIOH * nunlclpal corporationorgml«d rad raUtlii* under th. U». of the Sure of Hf^eecS; end ..tKe44»4.4 ''^*®*^* City Council of the City of Orono has adoatAd rad'"' for. euhd^i^f^o^’pS? bX«Tii.^h%r:ifd'i:?dei' „u 1 WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all reculrementa of the platting regulations of the City, Including: of ^dlcatlon of required drainage and utility easements Dedication of public streets and roads. Dedication of open space and flowage conservation easements Payment of a park dedication fee of $1,572 00 “-“"t «=ro«jI rh- r<^ IHE^FO^, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of ? City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Leach ASltion Hennenin County, Minnesota; subject to the following condition^ ' Hennepin ^e aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder s Office on or before March 1, 1979 tosether ^ with a certified original copy of this Resolution, and executed copies of thaTg^age and utiii^ easemenr dnf.,SaN,f flowage and conservation easeme'inrdacumeuL/ and private- -^ driveway and utility easement document. ^ Resolution shall expire If the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event. It will to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. •«*! Dated this 2<i ATTEST: of Auan«^t- Walter K. Ben^n, Clerk/AdminlsTFator03. 1978. luiyAX/iAyi /) //zh Aj William B.vanNest, Mayor mt ;J5 % • t- ^ %’ Ji' > w I I , 5 V . C3 • * A • . "iT ^------------IT \\-------------------------- ’4 •^4 z.Li^nn~zi- u'V r iii>^ - • -9 —•— • —^ym?r—f —1 1 • w t • ^ \ .•14 *\ V_____ % * f "" *" • ,V‘ -. 1.• » • d ______1 4 49 V 4 • ----------- . • • A\ '*’il;’ t^rfd^o-vium ^ Qv31 s A 331 BAO'biJp l»i«l '9 m03 3Nn A1U3<I0UJ NO NIVMU31VM v; vS/Xcl '/ 00 (j I ■►98 L«58 ’ 2*99 L»58 ‘ / . J/ U Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects ott« a ^ ?. C. f X Marwv i. S*rvM« I^II. f. rwiTTwr. # li 0 »«wr< ■. C«0< ^ I C. Nojr««, ^0«rt G. Schun»cn. • 1- luun H !fc«run. C?^* • SCTM^ C«AWCM September 21, 1995 \Cftf» A. >1. •. ^ftrreftt. ^ I. f cwtl W. feirer, PJ C#vid 0 LCMOia. ^ t rfooert C 'UMCC AJ.A. A, P 1- uara A Hanisa PJL \4.<ri*et T ffaucnji^. PX *ca A • L T>omai • A^ersaA. AL,^. ;pmps t tawwnpfpp*. ^ f Ohpwd C f t ThcTi*« A SyrttO.Pf. ff€ae» < i ^ t tvnjtri Marttrci. • £ MierMN • »*'u. ^ C. Thef»%ai r»*#rion. » I M<nat C L>Acr:. PJ Mines *. Maianx ^ t Jttry O. PprtKca ^ 1. ScecT i Arfjr*ea PJ iCemv fn p Aneersea P K. Si»r« ff to/M. PJ Mart A SC42. * S Gary W. Moritf^. P 1 pjui;. Cannen, Ai> i. tff^erroa P £ A. Pi OP<e A Ofovp • !. P*MH» j C#f«re«<. *• c Marii O Jr«Uit. • t. M»*CJ §. PL i_ P t it^pn L i/iT^C-rf. Pf, Oarv P Oikiofitr. P £ art«« e. Oa^.PL P. Teae Po«t«f. PX Ptii^ It y«^#.px Oou9««ti Benoit Pt Sntwn 0. Qusurtaa P f. Ceeuia OiMer. p j p?f*f >. wwer. PX Paul a. Nc^ff. P f John P. Ooracf. Px. Pm O. •o)Aon. PX ;#ft' ey i. tNe rVnyr. P f io.«ech *. imeifi PX tee M, MArm. P4f. Choral A (ncesan Leo M. Pfwe«sky Njinon M CiSOn M. fimg Jarnei P. tr^geiheruf Mr. John Gerhardson Citv of Orono O P O. Box 66 Crystal Bav. MN 55323 Re: Old Crystal Bay Road SAP 152-102-11 Our File No. 13960 6 Dear John; Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the 3rd Request for Payment for the above referenced project. This portion of the wor.x has been satisfacioniy completed and wc recommend payment. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerelv. HMOrb Enel. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612*636*4600 UfJZ.9 = ^ I -ZZ-^ fV Owiter City of Oroao, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Date Sept. 20,1995 F<« Period.Deccstbcr 29. 1994 to September 20, 1995 Request No. 3 Contractor Buffalo Bituminous. Inc. P O. Box 337. Butfaio, .nIN 55313 RXQUEST FOR PAYMENT Muaicipal Sutw Aid Street Improvcmcni Old Cn^tal Bjy Road Project No. S.A.P. 15:-10MI hiltf No. 13960 SUMMARY 1 Original Coniract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Rc\nsed Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned S Levs Refainage 5*^ 9 Sub-Total 10 Less .Kmcunt Paid Pre%*iou.sl\' 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOP. PAYMENT NO S lj7.105.00 s 157.105.00 148.355.46 $0.00 $ 148.355.46 $7,417.77 $140.937.69 $118.359.99 S :i2.577.:o Recommended tor Approval by: BONESTROO. KOSENE, .\NDERU1K Sc ASSOClVTES. INC. Approved by Contractor: BLTF.KLO BITLMINOUS. INC. .\pproved by Owner: CITY OK ORONO, .MN Specified Contract Completion Date: R estoration i. cle .vnup : 6/i ALL OTHEK work ; 9 20.94 Datcc 13960.RFP C4«rr%<i Unit Qnitatity lum Uait Qto»ntitT Pnc«To Dau T»Dat« Base Bi4 - S^VP, 152-102.11 • 2101.502 Ckanng (trre)E^\10 .<0.00 4 200.00 2101.507 Grubbing (tree)10 50.00 4 200.00 2104.501 Remerte plate beam guardrail LT 220 5.00 200 600.00 2104.501 Remove 15 ’ CMP cuKcrt IF 75 6.00 7<450.00 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement SY 1J30 3.00 oon3.900.00 2104.521 Salvage chain link fence LF 320 400 300 1.200.00 0104.601 Relocate mailboxes;, signs, etc.LS 1 200.00 1 200.00 0105.609 Geoiexiile fabric,SY 2.7W 1.00 2.500 2.500.00 2105.501 Commort excavjnion (P)CY U500 3.50 1.500 SJ150.00 2105.507 Subgradc e.xcavaiion CY 500 4.50 500 2.250.00 2105.521 Graaulai borrow (CV)CY 2^00 9.00 987 3.883.00 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV*)CY WO oo263 1,841.00 2211.501 Aggrccaie base, Cl.5, 100% crushed quarf>* rock TN 1.600 9.50 2.401.90 22.S 18.05 2211.502 Aggregate base. Cl 3 (P) (CV)CY y?o 12.00 656 7.S72.00 2331.504 AC-1 bit. material for mexture TN 43 120.00 44.20 5J04.00 233 U08 Type 41 wearing course mixture TN 195 17.00 204 3,469 87 2331.510 Tvpc 31 binder criursc mixture TN 260 16.C0 251.56 4.024 96 2331.514 T>pc 31 base course muiuie TN 525 16.00 325.6.3 5JJ10.08 2331.518 Biiuminous mexture for walk TN S4 .30.00 115..55 3.466.50 SP-1 Dnveviay restoration SY 250 6.50 2357.502 Biruounous material for tack coat GL 350 1.00 1.50 150.00 0412.604 Modular block retaining wall SF 2.150 13.50 2J62 31.387.00 2451.511 Coarse filler aggregate (CV)CY 30 15.00 SO 1.200.00 2501.515 12‘* CM pipe apron Ej\2 60.00 -> W 120.00 2501.515 12" RC pipe apron EA 2 400.00 800.00 2502.541 4" perforated P£ pipe drain IS 500 3.00 500 1.500.00 :1503.511 12*^ CM pipe LF 120 35.00 176 6.160.00 2503.511 12" RC pipe sewer (Cl V*). Dc^.3006 LF 110 22.00 110 2.420.00 2503.511 15 ' RC pipe :>cwci (CL V), Des.3006 LF 200 23.00 200 4,600.00 2503.573 ruiDL ic in.siaU 12''3i2'C^^ pipe tee FA 1 150.00 2503.573 Furnish S: i as tail 12" CM pipe 14 degree bend E.A 1 250.00 4 1.000.00 SP-2 Construct catch basin, design SP-2 FA 1 650.00 1 650.00 SP-3 Comiruct catch bitsia. design SP..>E.A 2 1.200.00 • 3 3.600.00 I3960RFP RP.l • 1. » U#m Cait CoNtritt QuMllTt C.R Pric Quantity Td Daft T« Daitf 151UQI RanUon^ rip rap^ Oa:a III Ci*4 30.00 2531^01 Ccocretc curb c<c fntter-E>c5T5n B6l^U 930 7.00 946 6,62100 ^ SP-t RcuLorciac for cone, curb 4S: jutTci Oii7.603 Fuinubi •& msiull chain link LF <)0 0.50 60 30.00 fence. 6* ull I-F 3i0 10 00 320 3JJ00.00 055T.b03 Furnx:;h %Sic io:»ta]I chain link fence. -12* i^lJ LF i:u i:.oo 110 1.320.00 0564.603 4** wide ?obd line, yellow* pami LF 1.3'.x»0.30 1.30O 390.C0 0264.603 4* wide solid line, white paint LF uoo 030 UOO 390 00 22^3.203 ^ilt fence, preassembled LF 100 .3 00 2573.501 Roadside ;>ccdiuc /\C 0.4 1. ICO 00 0.4 440.00 2575-502 Seed, mextuie 500 LB 40 2.00 40 80.00 2575.503 Sodding, Type Ia\\n SY :.ooo 1.50 U33 1 .R.37.00 2575.311 Mulcb uiaicruil. Type I TN o.s L-iO.OO 0.3 200.00 2375.519 Dtsk aachonn? 2575 531 Commercial Icrtili^er. analysis AC 0.4 100.00 0.4 40.00 20-10-10 T.N O.i 300.00 0.2 .60J5D Total Work Completed to Date .8148.355.46 I3W0.RFP RP-: < ,1 • • 4 c*c : Ci^rr ^ ^ PROJECT PAVMEMT STATUS Owner Prefect Prtject No. rile Vo. Comractor City of Orono ^^unicipal State .Md. Street Improvcmeni S.A.P. 152.102-11 l.'960 Buffalo Bituminous. Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date I •\mouot A* Total Change Orders * .Add PAYMENT SU^tM\RY No. 1 Period 4 < Start 11-1-94 12-29-94 11-1-94 12-29-94 9.20-95 Pa\nient 529,830.00 SS.529.99 22.577.70 Reiainat!e S 1.5 70.00 6.229.47 7,417.77 Completed $31,400.00 124.589.46 148.355.46 8 9 10 Total Payment to Date Ret.ainage, Payment No. Total Value Completed 140.937.69 7,417.77 S148.355.46 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract 157.105.00 0.00 $157,105.00 139<50.RrP ftp-3 •,ucTtz : 'T r:r.cs. i SH?2-i99S 3:e::?M FRC.M £C^*:S’SC3 • :iSSCC p. 1 1/J Bonestroo Rosene Anderfik & Associates Engineers & Architects aer^•tv•«. «W /maoww. irc- n »" Acr*«'lau* Oppaftutsiy ••atiWD*.» f C An##ft4«. ^ C %ii«rv»A t. SATwau. ^ (. Twm#f . ^ L *j 9nn t. C^ot • * e. N0>«$* a • f S(..UA vt k«e«<A. ’ * Senear September 21, 1993 City of Orono P.6. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55523 Attn: John Gerhardsoti Re: Brown Road & Watertown Road SAP 152-107-01 & 152-103-01 Our File Xo: 13972 M«war« A. ^ C trr»» A. oofaotf . P f. Ta^eer t P t ♦ ^05f#e. •S. C«w^4 O L^ttceu- P £• C •*#!»•«, AJ^. ;»erv A ••yr««n P i. Mjr« A Pi \A\tr^ T ?»wt—»et-i A TfVors#t P ,4r«#rfOn A ! A -ar'ct f. ?■ „ SC€«n<*r9. ^ £ rrjei v.vrrea. •* C rn5**5i ^ rete-i?-"! *'f. C ^-4 t. vi««ar^ •! .•rey O A®rtJ«A FJ Se«l d Affwr^^e . Af <#AA#tA P Af^9rmt^. I Mam f Ft \Ur« A S*«o. P £ 3>ry W Moe*«r\ P C FjhA i. (SAAfW A I 4 -;. f P I A » Ct Srr'Tfcr Af A weov*e. • f 4i^t0 i C«rw0H ^ 5. Vi»fll O •Va<trt. *f vt e J • t , ®.*'- ,»0 vjr jwe' ^ £ < L. PI 3«rv C V SIOM5. Pi %r*m R. 9«9t. Pi, P »oirtt^ F *. •>; e-tn P • f. X ttnott F i. SA4Wn 0 Cutt»#««A. F I CFCfTio Ft J. i'9^^ Ft • »uf a Heu«f F • . ••v F O0eoer F E O p f JOivTA I » I. .#♦ V ‘djr.n Ff C***e*0f A . to M. F /we'ts / \i. ^.«or> M »'e*g ^smmt P fn^ctAirdl '^<fp '* 4- rl C'?>' •0 Dear John. Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the 5ih Request for Payment for the above referenced project. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and wc recommend payment. A breakdown of the cost for Brown Road and Watertow n Road is as tollows: Brown Road Watertow'n Road STS,464.22 SI 5.897.75 If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely. Oa ROSENE. .ANDERLIK d: .ASSOCIATES. INC Harlan .VI. Olson HMO:rb End. fV ■oncstrse Owner CicY of Omno. P.O. Box o6, Crv-stal Bay, MN 5323 Dat* SapL 10J99S For Period July 13, 1995 to September 20. 1995 Rcqnest No, 5 Contractor Butfalo Bituminous, 2S52 County Road 12 North, Ruffnlo, MN 55313 REQUEST FOR P.WIMENT MUMCIP.\L state aid IMPROVE.MENTS BRO'VN ROAD R£tONSTRi:CTTO\ - SAP 152-107-01 WATERTOn-N ROAD CULVERT - SAP 152-103 01 File No. 139T: SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 P.evised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Reiainagc 5‘~r 9 Sub-Total 10 Les.s .-Vinount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE lUIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO 5 360,506,50 $366,506 50 s 513,214.37 s O.QO $513,214.87 s 25,660.74 %487,554.13 s 393.192.16 s 94,361.97 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor UUtKALO BITUVflNOUS, INC. .\pproved by Owner; cm OF ORONO specified Contract Completion Date: JUNE 16. 1995 Date: tuai Rrt'wn Road North P;«rt A • Street - SAP 152-107 2101.501 Oeanng(trcc) 2I01.S06 Grubbing (tree) 2104JO 1 Remove concrete cuib & gutter 2104.501 Remove pipe culvert 2104JS05 Remove aituminous pmemenl 0l04.b0l Relocate raailboxes, signs, etc. 0105.609 Gcotexiile fahrie. Type V 210SJ0I Commou excavation (P) *105.507 SuhgruiJe cr.c.svation 2105.521 Granular borrow (CV) 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV) 2211.501 Aggrejate base. a.5. lOOfl crusheJ quarry rock 2331.504 AC-1 bit matcnal for mixture 2331 JOS type 41 wearing course mix. (1995) 2331.510 Type 3l binder course mixture 2331.514 Type 31 base course rooctutc 2331.515 Bituminous muture for walk SP-1 Driveway resioration 2357.502 Bituminous matcn.sl tor tack coat 0412.604 Modular block retaining wall 2451.511 Cuaise liiter aggregate (CV*) 2502.541 4' perforated PE pipe drain 2506.522 Adjust frame and ring cstg 2521.501 4" concrete walk 2531.301 Concrete curb dt gutter-Design B618 SP-2 Reiniorcmg for cone, curb 3t gutter 0531.602 Pedeatri.sn curb ramp 256.3.WI Tratfic control 2564.531 Furii.<S; inst. sign panels. Type C 0564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) paint 0564.602 Pavement mcss.sge (left arrow) epoxv 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4' wide solid line, yellow epoxy Unit AC AC IJ^ LF SY LS SY CY CY CY t2Y 114 174 TN TN TN TN SY 01. .SF CY I.F FA SF U LF E. ^ LS SF EA F. A LF LF RP-1 Centra* l Qunali^ 0.2 0.2 40 540 10.300 1 14.400 12.000 IJOQ 600 1.S50 9.*'00 231 1.050 1.400 1.'’50 5 SO 550 1.500 I..300 50 850 4 20 7.230 360 < I 37.5 1 I 5J0O 5.500 Unit Prite 2.000.00 2,000.00 4.00 7.00 1.25 500.00 1.00 3.25 4.00 10.00 3.00 8.50 125.00 17.00 15 00 13.00 30.00 1000 1.00 13.00 10 00 7.00 200.00 5.00 5.00 0.50 125.00 5.000 00 35.00 30 00 50.00 0.20 0.20 Quantity T« Date 0.2 0.2 30 460 10.115 I 14.362 12.000 350 I0434J8 1S5.71 1.410 83 1.965 76 500 500 250 1.371 50 297J 4 7.1S9 250 2 1 T« Date 400.00 400.00 120.00 3.220.00 12.643.75 500.00 14.362.00 39.000.00 3.400.00 S8.693.93 23.213.75 21.162.45 29,486.40 15.000.00 5.000.00 250.00 24.323.00 500.00 2,032.30 300 00 35,945.00 125.00 25000 5.000.00 1 N«.Iten 0564.603 4" broken line, jellow paint 0564.603 4* broken line. \tiIdw epoxy 0564.603 4" .<;4>Itdl line, white pAinl 0564.60 J 4** \\jdc solid line, while cpox\ 0564.603 6** soJiJ line, white paiul 0564.603 6* solid Imc, white epoxy 0564.603 24" solid lino, white pamt 0564.603 24" solid lino, while epoxy 257UOl Spruce Colorado Blue 6 ’ Ht. D ^ D 2571.502 M.xpfc Sugar 3" cal.. B & 3 2571.502 Ash Summit 3^ CiL. B & B 25/3.503 Slit fence, preassembled 2575.501 Roadside seediof 2375^502 Seed mnluxc 500 2575.505 Soddiutf, Tv^ lawn 2575 511 Mulch material. T>pc I 2575.51^ Disk :inchonng 2575.523 Wood tiber blanket 2375.531 Commercial fcrtili/er. anaivstb 20-10^10 Total A - Street - S.\P 152 IU7 01 Pari H-St<um Scwcr»SAP !.^2 l0'" »)t Uaiii LF LF LF fp IP LF LF E\ ^.A FA LF AC LB SY 17>I AC SY TN CouUact QuAadly iOO 500 100 100 320 320 00 (SO 50 25 25 "00 15 150 0.400 .30 15 200 0.7 L'nU ^ril» o.:o o:o 1 25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 157.00 235.00 235.1X1 2.00 150.(X) 3.50 1.40 150.00 55.00 l..*0 400.00 Qtt.taUiy T» Dit« 224 8.S70 Amomat To D.a« 448.00 12.413.00 $.338,743.78 2501.515 12" RC pip« aproa h.A >400.00 5 2.000.00 2501 515 15" RC pipe apron EA 425.00 1 425 00 2501.515 24• RC pipe .ipron E.V 1 5<000 I.ICO.OO 0501.602 Trash ijuard for 15" RC pipe apron E.\>30O.W 5 1^00 00 0501.602 Trash j.uard tor 24' RC pipe apron HA 1 500 00 1,000.00 2203.511 12" RC pipe sev^er i CL V) D«. 3006 LI-410 23 00 463.5 10.660.50 2503.511 IS" RC pipe se-^er (Cl. V3 Dc*. 3006 LF 470 25 00 $16 12.900.00 2503.511 IS" RC pipe (Cl. V*) Dcs. 3006 LF 684 .71.50 700 24.835.00 25 03.511 24" RC pipe sewer (Cl V) Dcs. 3006 LF 156 33.00 164 5.412.00 SP*3 Construct catch basiru Dcs. 3-4 EA 5(H).00 1.000.00 SP-4 Construct catch basin. Des. 3-6 E.\-T 700 00 9 6.300.00 SP-3 Construct CBMH. Dcs. 3*5 £.\11 1.200.00 10 12.COO.00 RP-2 htm Uort CuBtracI QuBBlity UftU Price QMMuiliy Fd Date A bsoub I To Doi« SP-6 Coiwxrucl inlet control j tnicture Dcai§n 4-2. 4 ’ dia. SP*i Connect to exkx. itorm manhole SP*9 Cut into existing storm seiner 2511.501 Rjodom rip rap. CL III • DELETED Total B-Storm 152-107-Ul W^iX^nowu Ro,iJ Cuiveft Part C - SAP 152-103-^11 21UI.S01 acanng 2101.506 Grubbing 2104 50l Remove pipe culvert 2104 505 Remove bituminous pavemc-nl 2104.509 Remove guard posts OIOS.609 Geoiexulc fabric. Type V 2105.501 Common excavation (P) 2105.521 Granular borrow (CV) 2105.523 Common borrow (CV) 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV') 2211.501 iVggrCgalc baic. C1.5. lOO'^ wtushed qu^irry rock 2221.501 iVggicgjic shouldering. Class 5 100% crushed 4uarrv' rock 2331.504 ACT bit. material tor nuxtura 2331.508 Type 41 weanag course mixture 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture SPT Drivtsvay restoration 2357 502 Bituminous maicriai for tack coal 2451.501 Structure excavation. Cl U (P) 2451.511 Coarse filter aggregate (CV) 2501.511 12' CM pipe culvert 2501.511 48" RC pipe culvert.CL4.Dcs. iOOO 2501J15 12" CM pipe apron 2501.515 12" RC pipe apron 2501.515 43" RC pipe apron EA EA fa CY I 23 1.150 00 300.00 300.00 0.00 1 13 6 1.150.00 3.900.00 1.800 00 586.032.50 AC 0?2.000 00 03 600 00 AC 0.3 2.000.00 0.3 600.00 LF 64 ;o.oo 64 1.2SO.OO SY L3(X>1.25 1.333 1,666.25 EA .to 10.00 40 400.00 SY of 11.00 2.445 2.445.00 CY 1,450 3.50 1.450 5.075.00 CY 600 10.00 157.50 1.575.00 CY l.OOO 6.00 700 4.200 00 CY 300 6.00 TN 1,500 8.50 1481.79 12.595.22 I'N 130 10 00 IS 750.00 TN 18 125.00 23 2,925.00 TN 155 P.50 132 2.310.00 •IN ISO 16.00 276.82 4.429.12 SY 30 10.00 30 300.00 GI.100 1.00 100 100.00 CY 7S0 4,00 1.800 7.200.00 CY i:o 14.00 90 1.260.00 LF 50 24.00 160 5.S40.00 LF 124 140.00 112 15,680 00 £.\*4 70.00 t 450.00 E.A 1 400.00 1 400.00 E.A 1 1,27000 1 .1.270.00 RP-3 ' . K«b ften Unit Qasntitr UlUl Trie* QiUjitity To D»t« AaiMial To Date 0501.602 Tf3sh guard for -iS** RC pip^ apron iL\1 950.00 1 950.00 SP-'' Construct inlet control stnicture. I>c!>tgn 4-2. 6‘ dia.EA 1 1.-00.00 1 IJOO.OO 2511.501 Random np rap. a IV - DEIETHD CY 28 0.00 2554.501 Traffic b^uncr, Des. B6307 LF 500 10.00 475 4,750.00 2554.509 Guide post, Typ« A EA .<■»25.00 SO 2.000.00 2554 511 Aaclrorin^ assembly • pUxe beam tL\200.00 >400 00 2554J23 1'wistcd end ircaimcnt EA 450.00 2 900.00 2563.601 Traffic control LS 1 5.000.00 1 5.000 00 0564.60.3 4 ' s^rde solid line, yellow paint LF 1.100 0.20 1.100 220.00 0564 6f)3 4" wide solid line, white paint LF I.ICK)0.20 l.lOO 220 00 2573.503 Slit fence, prcnsscmbled LF 300 200 200 400.00 2575.501 Roadside seeding AC 0.4 ZOOM 2575.502 Seed, mLxture 500 LB 40 3.50 25752>05 Sodding. Type lawn SY -00 1 50 6"2 1.008.00 2575.511 Mulch material, Tyj>e I TN 08 150.00 2575J19 £>i>k acchoriug AC 0.4 Tj.i.Ki 257.^.531 Commercial fertilizer, analysis 20.10-10 T.N O.l 400.00 Total C - SAP 152.103-01 Alternate Bid - Contractor shall bid cable cone, in lieu of random fo rap Bo^c bid tor np rap '*ill not he paid lu tins ease. Hro'.vn Road North Part M • Storm Scvver-*^AP 152 10^-01 SF-lO Cable concrete, CC-20 Total Fait B • Storm Sewer SF Z56 5.00 %Vaicrio\*n Road Culvert p-.rt r - SAP 152103.01 SP-ll Cable concrete. CC-.3.> Total Part C - Culvert SF 320 6.00 S88.43S.59 SO.OO $0.00 RP-4 No.Uf 01 Unit Cuolracl QfiMOtity Coil rnc€ QuACtllf To Dote AfttOttoC To Dote Total A • Street • SAP 152-10T^» Total li . Storm Svw«r-SAP 152-107-01 Toi.ll Part C- 152-103-01 Total All. - Part B total Alt. • Part C Total Woik Completed to Date 33S.743.7S S6.032.50 S8.438.5 ‘) O.tn) _____ojia. S5l3.:i4.$7 Material ou baud PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner Project Project No. File No. Contractor City of OroQo Brown Rd. Recoitstructioa / Watertown Read OaKert SAP 152-107-01 / S.\P 152 103-i)! 13972 Buffalo Bituminous CH4NGE ORDERS No. Dat« I Tot.il Change Orders - Add PAYMENT SUM.MAKY 6 7 $ Total Payment to Date Reiainagc, Payment No. Total Amount tamed .SU.'J7.554 13 25.6W.-4 Orisinal Coutr.ict Chanjte Orders S5 13,214 87 Revised Con tract 1 Amount: No.Period Payment K»*tjina«;e Completed 1 Start 10-1-94 Sie.S36.4tl SV75 60 $19,512.00 2 10-1-94 ll-S-d4 229,898.24 13,075.51 261,510.15 3 ll-8-«4 2-13-9.S 66.723.01 16.587.24 329.800.85 4 2-13 95 7-13-95 7S.034 5J 20.094.32 411,942.44 5 7-13-95 9-20-95 94.361.9',25.060.74 513.214.S7 S566,506.50 0.00 S566.506.50 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION c» OfDATE: September ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Maxwell Bay Access Updaie/Schedule Lake Use Commiuee Meeting DNR has been making slow’ but visible progress on the Maxwell Bay access: • The gas station, Gayle ’s quonset, and the Sprague buildings were removed within the last two weeks. The Dunn house is scheduled for removal in the very near fumre. Peer Environmental is coordinating the contamination clean-up work. Soil excavation and site restoration will be done by Peiro Tank Services. Trucking of contaminated soil to a site where it will be burned is being done by C.S. McCrossan. This work was occurring the week of September 18th. The DNR’s survey crew was scheduled to be on the site last week, >i.ai Lynell of the DNR is expecting to have a revised concept plan completed by October 3rd. Apparently discussions with Ramberg/Scho.'iemcn are continuing, and it now seems hopefi'l that they will come to an agreement to sell their property to the DNR. Ron Moorse. John Gerhardson and I met with Larry Killien on September 13th to get an update and discuss issues relating to the turn lane (specifications/responsibility for design and construction/funding). It is appropriate to schedule a Lake Use Committee meeting for October 4. 5 or 6 at 8:00 a.m., to review the following issues; 1. Review planning and approval process. Discuss time liiie for approvals and construction. 3. Discuss turn lane issues. 4. Review updated conceptual site plan Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 September 22, 1995 Maxwell Bav Access Memo It is siafFs intent to assign the access a new single address on North Shore Drive (although the entrance will be on Tonkawa Road, it is statFs expectation ^bat a North Shore Drive address will be more user friendly for people trying to find the access, and may reduce the amount of traffic which might attempt to use Tonkawa Road to get to the site). S; The DNR’s current time line irwludes a public hearing/commercial site plan review at the Planning Commission in November, with final Council action in early December. They expect to have the next generation concept plan completed by October 3rd for a Lake Use meeting October 4. 5 or 6, and then would have their preliminary plans completed by the end ot October in time for the November 20th Planning Commission meeting. We would then anticipate Council action on November 27th. or at the December Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION QUESTED: Scheduling of I-ake Use Committee for October 4, 5 or 6. 8:00 a.m XREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^ ' DATE: Sept. 21, 1995^ v r ^ * ■ "T L ITEM NO: Department ApproTal: Name Dorothy HalHn Title City Clerk Administrator Revie^-ed:Agenda Section: Licenst^ j ---------------------------------------------------- -------- item Description: Licenses 1 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLER McCarthy Water & Waste 6250 Highway 12 West Maple Plain HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE ANNUAL REVIEW Ben Meinhardt 3585 Sixth Avenue North COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses iTf OF ORONO (^2) ^ b-7357 2p0 F tUcy Parkway, P.O. Box 66 ^sta Bav. MN 55323 0 ’ SEPTIC systt :m lnstallers LICENSE APPLICATION , . w ^ I ff- bond Certificate of Insurance and evidence of NIPCA ^ ap“icaj;ns a« subj«t ,o a ten am day approval ponod. 1.^ h 1 - /?7 tCdS'^Business or trade name /*/ -------------------— Business address ffl tplt J)yJ 555::^y iSfftet) Business phoneJ. u CiCV) / Residence phone / 7^- / Uip) Name of apolicant or company represemative(s) holding MPCA certification nvi rA rn c /I^a ;______________ 5. 6. Tvpe of certification held: _Installer imper Expiration date: Have you ever hold a S|p^ystem Insialler license in Orono before? S. Most recent year __/ 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? fl 0__ hen. WTiere? ____________________________________ w ^ -------« *•••-• •.wu s. 9. Do vou do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? ^es------- Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes ^'o No i. ^ ; • f ?«%#•••• • ‘-’U • W SLT5MITTALS REQUIRED: ^ 1. S50.00 License application fee. 2 52,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. y 550-100-300.000 minimumCertificate of Insurance. [y 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. /Q^3/-7S ” licenses will NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license UBderygned hereby makes applicabou .0 ‘h^Ciyof Orcoo Murnesoo for a H and repair septic systems, and'or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. ^ 77?/;/? / .Applicant’sSignapare,//(i^^4L'7^^// /la ^^JL oLDate Staff recommendation: Approval Reason for dental: __________ ire// /{(JL/IO^. CITY USE o ,ONLY City Council Action: U^tc mJ Denial Date Approved Denied Date license mailed_ CITY CP ORCNO ?.C. 3cx 6o, Crys-tal Bay, ,2_ic3ricr. Data:a-® ^:,cer:se —o lil.CSr^SS — ^ ’ c~^tal Bay, I'C; - = ____r,^CB5Sz“"initial' APPLICS.TIOK FOP. AIJNUAL ECHB OCCUP^-^CS Annual ?.ev:.ev ree - /iO ^ ^ ^ 'i'=r>TT.: ^/X 5^' ^^ irA.*!!: !W ^ /x ^ . -,r.r5--i? . -y ^----f^‘ iJtO C^f • __^ •./ — ^ ^ ▲ <MMi* «B# W ~^- C-h. —- -r" :;o. cf lulcyees vithin cperattcn:^ia=:-: of this arpliontncn irovide'l-st cf nan.es ci er.ployees ^ ^ // A yf*^/ .r /C.-/V' ""^413. ^ ■ 1* ’r ^r^-pe cf Business to be Dperaneo: -’--r staff shall have five nff’cajce a reconnaendatio If a site inspecrticn 5s^^^^S»s^“fsr“ ’D'^chi-biHcrr.s Cccupa-—cn r-- -— ^ -- o _____ _____ A A Was a ncr.e ccoupattcn __._..x,,- -c” an’’ o’tstnesj --------- -It as u-_cv ------c- —-_________—i::02ns2S. ______ .: - —o-attcn ’A-:.nno-- ---i' — —*** - • ■ , All perscr.s e.-jcaiec i.- aI-.s i’jsA.-.sss --s: rssA^s ii «» —ms —----r ^ m ;;o c “teroial sagns —2si-i* Ota— ocne. isr=i = -si =---■=- per-iAAec a -- •• •• w t Nc ce. * 'ive s •-s.v rs S-C-.ec c— —-----— v» • •* ■ _ laCS ^4*-* • — — ^ W - • •• ■“ 'cunter retail sales is net allowed. ^ • • £3 » W — — tic CCS cccie ____r.usc be cracnec irer. ---------------------- -s——— CC’CCCcuccec £mCC - s-----— — r..,e ur.pers ,-^-- -25- : ^idi-c.-.il ccr.cpppcr.s _e .---/ aa. --. - C - CC— WW4-.S d—^ '0^v■//^^X'±ate: —5ff reccnnencs -—- _ —» — ^ g.ooer re’o_e'* —— ~^ ^ a...eraJDF. CIYI 0.= - —' license _ _ __ lenta- -- - - - - - f 0llC'<"'-“-r • -- - - - "' ^ '^u\ ^ cc Zcr.ccc C- -c-c.—• . —— —— ^cne. 4- —— —— *^o C CS SBOXSTBK THO, SEP 1«, 1»9S> SiSS SM pass 1(CE KO COCE DSXB !CE SNOmT I* •DISCKIPTION sccomiTNUMBER INVOICE NO NUMIBR NMIUAL340291993/09/13 $3,372.00 CITT COUliTT CUOIT UMIOM sAvmos ifiTsnXiD & transf 9999-2030 003220 OH<•>$3,572.00*34030 1993/09/13 $9,208.54 FIRST HRTIOWU. BANK OP LA FIT,FICA,MEDCR WITHHELD 9999-2030 003215 OR 1993/09/13 $2,741.81 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA CITY SHARE FICA,NEOCR 9999-2032 003215 OH <*>$11,950.35* 34031 1993/09/13 $1,265.00 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003222 OH <*>$1,265.00* 34032 1993/09/13 $164.82 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A THOMTQN #C0266780 9999-2030 003219 OH <*>$164.82* 34033 1995/09/13 $174.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A SKREEN #C0262310 9999-2030 003218 OH <•>$174.50* 34034 1995/09/13 $100.00 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEF C0»O> WITHHELD 9999-2030 003223 OH <*>$100.00* 34035 1995/09/13 $2,769.77 MINNESOTA DEPT OP REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD 9999-2030 003216 OH <*>$2,769.77* 34036 1995/09/13 $55.00 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003224 OH <•>$55.00* 34037 1995/09/13 $100.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEP C DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003225 OH <*>$100.00* 34038 1995/09/13 $242.76 PEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003227 OH <*>$242.76* 34039 1995/09/13 $1,085.00 PEBSCO/US CONP OF MAYORS DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003226 OH <*>$1,085.00* 34040 1995/09/13 $3,494.83.PERA PERA WITHHELD 9999-2030 003217 OH 1995/09/13 $4,594.08 PBRA PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2031 003217 OH <♦>$8,088.91* 34041 1995/09/13 $29.00 UNITED WAY CHARITY DONATIONS WITHHEL 9999-2030 003221 OH <*>$29.00* cxL cm RSQifm tnro, sir 14, i9$s, itss &hM I (m ;cK om cncK momn VEKOOm•31,597.11*pag« 4lASeKXfTXOHACCOUMTNUNBERINVOICB MO MUNBBl MANUAL CaUMCIL OiBCK RKGISTEf^CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNTW£D, SEP 23. 1995, 10:35 AM pago JVENDORdescriptionACCOUNTHUMBERINVOICE NO POHUMBER MANUAL0249-4342 9272-41 OH0590 4343 9267-27 OH0249-4342 9272-42 OH0099 4231 138870 OH0099-4 34(1 35263S OH0099-421C 003243 OH 0129-4210 003243 01! Ob49 4 003229 OH O591-40Oi 30406 OH 0591 4302 30891 on 0200 4304 034998 OH 03404305 034993 on 0200 4305 034998 OH 0200-4305 034998 OH 0200-430S 034990 on 0360-4305 350003 on 0355 4305 35626 OH 0361-4305 35627 Oil 0362 4305 35628 on 0360-4305 35630 OH 0360-4305 3563 1 OH 0357 4305 35631 OH 9673 11,00 0356 12 OH 0129-4341 6 7 97 OH 0129-4341 6853 Oil 0129-4341 6873 OH 0129-4341 6878 OH 0069-4356 001249 OH 0132-1317 697-4 OH 0099 4321 003241 OH 0099 4321 003241 OH 0590-4220 00324 1 OH 0039-4399 003241 OH 0039-4399 003241 OH 34045 1995/09/2S $74.08 ALL STAR ELECTRIC1995/09/25 $30.00 ALL STAR ELECTRIC1995/09/25 $89.54 AI.L STAR ELECTRIC<•>$173.S2‘34046 1995/09/25 $320.42 APACHE PAPER CO<•>$320.42*34047 1995/09/25 $189.25 ASCCM MAILING SYSTEM< ♦ >$169.25*34048 1995/09/25 $226.00 ASPLUND COFFEE 1995/09/25 $103.00 ASPLUND COFFEE <•>$329.00* 34049 1995/09/25 $5.30 AT6T INFO SYSTEM <•>$5.30* 34050 1995/09/25 $28.28 AUGIKS M03ILB CHS? 1995/09/25 $39.24 AUGIBS MOBILE CHEF <* >$67.SO* 34051 1995/09/25 $100.00 BONESTROO ROSENS ASN 1995/09/25 Ca,410.3«HONBSTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $357.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $474.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $256.50 BONESTRCX) ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $3,082.94 BONESTROO RO;'.ENE ASN 1995/09/25 $60.34 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $363.29 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $300.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $2,072 OH BONE.STROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $528 93 BONESTROO ROSENS ASN 1995/09/25 $469.90 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 1995/09/25 $128.75 nONE.STROO RO.'IENE ASK <*>;16,694 .61* 34052 1995/09/25 $142.04 CHUNKS GARAGE 1995/09/25 $69.69 CHUNKS GARAGE 1995/09/25 $24.53 CHUNKS GARAGE 1995/09/25 $193.99 CHUNKS GARAGE <•>$130.25* 34053 < * > 1995/09/25 $5.00 $5.00* CITY OK GOLDEN VALLE 34054 1995/09/25 $ It.474.00 CITY OF MOUND <♦>$16,474.00* 34055 1995/09/25 $0.78 CITY OF ORoNO 1995/09/25 $6.65 CITY OF ORONO 1995/09/25 $7.65 CITY OF ORONO 1995/09/25 $2.66 CITY OF ORONO 1995/09/25 $2 9.00 CITY OF ORONO REPLACE LIGHT OCR RD REPAIR PHONE CONNHCTIJN REPIAR TURN SIGNALMETER RENTAL 4TH OTHCOFFEE COFFEE LONG I)1STA1>ICE CHARGES SANDWICHES FOR RESALE SANDWICHES FOR RESALE JUNK COUNCIL MTG JUNE APPLIC REVIEWS JUNE L.L. CLEANWTR PHOJEC JUNE GEN ENGINEERING HWY 12 SIDEWALK ALIGN DROWN RD WATERTOWN INSP J OCB RD URIDGB INSP JULY OCB RD ST IMPROVE INsP JU WILl.OW DR INSP/KASMKNTS J tlROWN RI)/WATERTOWN INST BROWN RD ENG RFP H3-'l WATERTOWN irULVERT ENG KKP L.S )(7 KEIIAB JUr.Y TUNE UP/OIL CHANGE *3/2 TKANSMISSU)N «171 OIL CHANCE BRAKES/OIL CHANGE *173 KIRK CONTRACT 4TH VFR AODT. PO>'.TAGE ADD'D POSTAGE MOTOR OIL PRODUCE-EMP PICNIC rOONClL OHKC. xBGIfJTtR l^SD, CBP ^0, la^S. Mi p.* jt»CirECK NO 34055 CHECK DATE CHECK ANOUUT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT roNUJ’BER INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL<*>34056 <*> 34057 <•> 34058 <*> 34059 <»> <• > 34 062 <*> 34063 <•> 34064 <•> 34065 < ♦> 34066 1995/09/261995/09/251995/09/261995/09/261995/09/251995/09/251995/09/251995/09/26 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 34060 1995/09/25 <•> 34061 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/26 1995/09/26 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/26 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 518.23 $17.40 $19.03 $101.38*$311.25 $186.75 $62.25 $62.25 $131.75 $764.26* $235.00 $80.00 $315.00* $506.84 $187.68 $693.52* $24.25 $2.55 $75.91 $12.75 $33.97 $1.14 $2.66 $0.B6 $115.52 $269.60* $813.64 $813.64• $308.53 $308.53* $51.21 $43.66 $43.55 $138.32* $337.60 $682.50 $1,020.00* $40.00 $40.00* $159.00 $159.00* $2.60 $52.7.7 CITY OF ORCMiO CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONOCITYVIBW PIJKKI 6 HTG CITYVIEW PI31BG 6 HTG CITYVTEW PIJ4BG 6 HTG CITYVIEH PLMBG 6 HTG CITYVIEW PLMBG fc HTG COFFIN 6 GHOMBRRG COPFIH 6 GRONBERG COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COIX>NIAl. LIFE INS CO COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIKE/GRP LIFE/ORP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GR!> LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP CON-MIX INC CRABTREE COMPANIES IN'' DEPT OF ADMINISTRATI'J.'J DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION DEPT OK ADMINISTRATION Kr.MEK J PETERSON CO BlJiER J PETERSON CO FEED RITE CONTROLS FT.OYD TOTAL SECURll*Y G 6 K SERVICES G i K SERVICK.S SUPPLIES-EMP PICNIC MISC SUPPLIES ADD'L POSTAGESERVICE ALL A/C'S SERVICE ALI. A/C*S SERVICR ALL A/C'S SERVICE ALL A/C'S UNIT #5 A/C RF,PAIk DRAWING OF OCU RD DRAWING MISC. LOTS OCT INSURANCE OC.T INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE ocr INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE OCT INSURANCE. CEMENT FOR SIDEWALK toner cartridges 003S-4399 003241 0129-4210 003241 0129 4321 003241009901290549056900994343 434 3 4343 4343 4343 1908719087190871908719101 0361-4306 1272 0361-4306 1273 0129-4162 090896000135 9999-203C 090895000135 003 9 0069 0129 0174 0249 0549 0669 0690 9999 4162 4152 4152 4152 4152 1152 4162 4162 2030 003236 003235 003236 00.3236 003236 0032.35 003235 003235 003236 0395-4530 1309 0099-4210 20762 MICROPTCHK ZONING FILES 0174-4306 036261 MICROFICHE COUNCIL KTNUTH 0039-4306 086509 MICROFICHE PIAKNIKG CCM.M 0174-4 306 086509 FORCE MAIN TONKAWA PUMP L.S. «3 CYLINDER RENTAL 4T1I QTR MONITORING STEFFUNHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES 0569-4344 003244 0569-4344 003245 0549-4234 28731 0099-4343 260696 0590-4221 673322 0249-4221 573323 OHOMOHOHOHOHOH OH Oil OH OH OH OH OH! OHS OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH council. CHiiCK REGISTER RED, SEP 20, 1995, 10:35 AM page 3CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 3406€VENDOR ACCOUNT PODESCRIPTION NUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL 34067 <•> 34068 <•> 34069 <*> 34070 <*> 34071 <*> 34072 < • > 34073 <•> 34074 <*> 34075 <*> 34076 1995/09/251995/09/251995/09/251995/09/251995/09/251995/09/251995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 S8.28 $8.28 $68.53 $2.60 $8.28 $49.68 $3.61 $69.02 $273.60‘ GGGGGGG G &kkkkkk k KKKKKKK K SERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICES SERVICES RATHBUNRATHBUNSTREET EMPLOYEESSTKFFENHAGKNRATHBUNSTREET EMPl^YEES STEFi-ENHAGEN FT.OC3R MATS 0569056902490590054902490590 0099 4221422142214221422142214221 4343 5733245771815771B057717958099958999B580996 580997 $75.57 $75.57* GENICOM CORPORATION PRINTER RIBBON.S 0099-4210 1306972 $27.57 $209.16 $6.91 $16.13 $259.77* GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO MTSC PARTS MISC PARTS MTSC PARTS MISC PARTS 0129-4232 003234 0249-4232 003234 0569-4232 003234 0590-4232 003234 $130.41 $110.41* GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR GOLF CART 0590 4342 952361 $1,846.48 $170.74 $301.00 $1.154.02 $301.00 $3,773.24* GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INC HEALTH INC HEALTH INC HEALTH INC OCT INSURTU^CB OCT INSURANCE ir?iOCT INSURANCE OCT TNSURANCB "URANCBOCT 1N.> 0129 0174 0249 9999 0590 4151 4151 4151 2030 4151 3956881 3956881 3956881 3956861 3956881 $515.54 $515.54* HENN ri’Y FIN DIV $154.13 $154.13* K(X)M 6 BOARD-JULY J H LARSON EI-ECTRICAL CO l.TOHTHUUiS 0080-4350 530 0099-4232 003240 $75.00 $75.00* KRANTZ, DR C. KARL REFUND FIREARMS PERMITS 9001-3524 003250 $148.36 $148.36* LAFAYETTE CT.UB BREAKFAST HERTIHG 0020 4.382 003236 $2,008.28 $2,OOa .28* 1..AWN DKTAIT.FRS1 INC.AUGUST SERVICES 0290-1313 $2,205.00 LOG IS - SUI'PE 300 AU<;SERVICES 0099-43S2$667.00 ixxn.s ■ SUITE 3 0 0 AUG SERVICES 0129-4392$226.00 LOG IS SUITE 300 AUG SERVICES 0S49-4392$526.00 LOG IS - SUITE 300 AUG SERVICES 0S69-4352$379.01 LOG IS SUITE 300 AUG DISC SPACE 0099-43555793 93 LOOTS SUITE 300 AUG DISC SPACE 0129-4355 $10.54 LOG IS SUITE 300 AUG DISC SPACE 0549-4355$24.GO LOG IS - SUITE 300 AUG DISC SPACE 0569-4355$28.78 r.OGIS - SUITE 300 AUG COURIER 0569- 1.153$65.00 !:OGIS ‘ SUITE 300 ASCII F1U2S UB SYSTEM 0569-4355 AR0895 rAR0a9:> AR0895 ARO095 ARQ895 AR0895 AR0B95 AR0895 AR0895 AR0895 OHOHOHOHOHOffon OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 01! OH OH OH OH Oil OH OH on OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH v.O'JNCiu CllEl“’JtlGli-ii.R Wr.Tj. tiEP 20, 19yS, 10:J5 AM f • »•CHECK NO CHECK DATE 1995/09/25 CHECK AMOUNT34076 <• >34077<*>34078 <•> 34079 <•> 34080 <•> 34081 <■> <■> 34183 <■> 34084 <»> <*> 34086 <»> 34087 <•> 34086 < • > C-' > 1995/09,'25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 34082 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 34085 19^5/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1 995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 1995/09/25 34089 1995/09/25 $28.00 $4,953.86*VENDORLOGIS - SUITE 300 DESCRIPTION ACC0»’NINUMP.I.K 1K»DT„>. NO r*oMBER$20.41$20.41*DONG LK. FORD TRACTOR$4,250.00 $4,250.00* $160.71 $602.02 $461.72 $532.02 $1,756.47* MBD CTR HKADTH CAKE MED CTR HKADTH CARS MED CTR HEADTII CARH MBD CTR UEAI.ril CAKB $4,207.50 4,207.50* $32.15 $49.96 $8.97 $91.08* MIDWEST DSNS PROD MIDWEST BSNS PRCD MIDWEST HSN' PROD $36.22 $36.22* MINN COMM $n.so $31.50 $45.00* $7,955.75 $7,955.75* $74.22 $74.22* $69.35 $69.35* $67.16 $67.16* MINNETONKA MN DENHEIT ASSN MOBILE RADIO EN( ’"/vi.OlE RON $85.69 NAVAKJ^K TRUK VALUE $34.87 NAVAkKK TRUK VALUE $64.98 NAVARKK TRUE VALUE $37.26 NAVAKKli TRUK VALUE $17.43 NAVAkRli TRUK VAI.UE $2.55 NAVARRK TRUE VALUE $111.44 NAVARKU TRUK VALUE $1.80 NAVARRi:TRUK VALUE $356 00* $204.79 NSP $204.79* paga 4RANDALASCII P1LBS-U8 3YSTE.M 0S49-43Si>AR0B4SBALANCE DUS-HOSE 0240 4.204/27 ^OHWTU TANK k PUMP STATION 9i71-l^j00 82S0 Oil OCT INSURANCE 0129-411>1 1396545 OhOCT ID.5URANCE 017*1 1151 139654b OilOCT INSURANCE 0219-4151 1396545 OHOCT IN.SURANCE 9999-2030 1396545 OH SAC CHARGES-AUG 9301-222C 003237 OH MTSC SUPPLIES 009‘) 4210 31965S OHMISC SUPPLIES 0129-421C 319655 onTHESAURU.S 009D-421C 321831 OH PAGik SERVICE 0249-4221 7066000995S OH OXYGEN 0129-4232 KI089SOd69 OHoxy<;en 0219-4232 RI08950ft6l)OH 4TM QTK rRO.SF.CUTION SKkVI OOBO 4302 0479-4 OH CX:T l.NSURANCH 0129-4151 003246 OH PHONE REPAIR «171 0129-1320 29233 OH MEALS RKIMDDTISEMSNT 0039-4302 JOJ233 OH MISC PARTS 0099-4231 003228 OHMI SC P7VRTS 0129 4232 003228 OHMISC PARTS 0249 1232 003226 OilMISC PARTS 0171-4232 003228 OHMI.SC PARTS 0290-4232 00322B OHMT.SC PARTS 0569-4232 003228 OHMISC PARTS 0590-1232 0C3228 OHMISC PARTS 0569-4234 003228 OH NSP CHARCK.S 0569-4324 003217 OH :OUliCIL CHECK RKGISTi-^R WHl), EKR 20. \99i,, 10 35 AM page SACCOITNTPOsac so CHECK DATE CHECK Molitrr VfiSDOIC DESCRIPTION NUMBER INVOICK NO NUMUPR MAMUAL3409C1*95/09/25 $17.30 O'SULMVAMS tIAVARRE AUTO OIL CHANGE ERZ TRUCK 0174-4341 0032JI OH1995/09/25 $11.77 O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE AUlO TIRE REPAIR 0S90-4342 003230 OH1995/09/25 $124.75 O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE A’JIC CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 2012475 OH<•>$153.42*34091 1995/09/25 $11 55 OLD DUTCH FOODS IKC CHIPS FOR RESALE C59: »8o;7 ^2 97 0 OH<•>$11340921995/09/25 $25.90 OLSON« JOHH C.199b CA1.ENDAR/PLAN:4ER C099-421C 00J212 OH<•>$25.90*34093 1995/09/25 54C.S0 PIONEER APPLICATION 12064 0174-4323 136 OH[1995/09/25 $sa.so PlONEtai APPLICATION *2065 0174 -4323 m OH<•>$105 30* 34094 1995/09/25 $243.75 PLAISTED COMPANIES GREENS COVERS 0S90-4343 J012 1^Oil <•>$243 75* 34095 1995/09/25 36 ,913 7B POPHAM HAIK E /^SSOC tJUNE LEGAL SERVICES 9001-1299 26796tD on 1995/09/25 57 .715.29 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC JULY LEGAL SERVICES •JOOl 12 99 268HS22 OH < • >514 ,628.57* 34096 1995/09/25 $29 40 REED VENDINC CANDY £A)R RESAIJ5 0591 --IB02 1?599B OH <•>$29.40* 34097 1995/09/25 $30 59 RTTZ CAMHNA FILM PR(X"BSSING 0099-4210 3767S52 Oil 1995/09/25 $a .8£RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3767976 Oil 1995/09/25 $38.15 RTTZ CAMERA HATrERY k FlIM 0129-4210 J76813S Oil 1995/09/25 $77.37 nil A CAMERA CAMTiKA Rt:i*AIH, PROCKSSINCJ 01 29-4210 J768126 OH <*>$154.97* 34098 1995/09/25 .693 75 ROLF E KRJCK:;OK OCT .ASSESS 1N(; FEE OOHO 4307 003239 Oil <•>,693.75* 34099 1995/09/25 $150.00 STAR TRIDUNE AI) FOR rso 0129-4323 003238 OH <♦>$150.00* 34100 1995/09/25 $250.00 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSC!1 T.H. 12 STUDY 0299-4900 lb61.22 OH <•>$250.00* 34101 1995/09/25 $1.3.3.12 US WEST COMMIJN DATA LINE CHARGES 0099-4355 003248 Oil 1995/09/25 $17.75 US WEST COMMUN DATA LIME CHARGES 0549-4355 00324B OH 1995/09/25 $26.63 US WEST COMMUN DATA LINE CHARGES 0569-4.355 003248 OH 1995/09/25 $45.94 US WEST COMMON WTR TOWER (OMM LJNE 0549-4320 003248 Oil <♦>$223.44* 34102 1995/09/25 $S2 63 VARDA S.TI.EN7 ALARM MAT FOR Al.ARM 0129-4312 16/06 OH <•>$52.63* 34103 1995/09/25 $99.05 WARNING larFiS OF MN HARR 1 CADE RENTAL 0249-4331 76SB4 OH <»>$99 05* 34101 1995/09/25 $62 27 WATERPRO REPAIR CLAMP 0569 4232 726234 OH <»>$62 27* COUDCIL CH g » R£G1 u T£k Wiiu, iiiiF ^U, iJ'ib, XU;JS AJI P-3* «CHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AK0UN7 VENDOR HIDKEE BROS DESCRIPTICH BACKHOE k I.ABORES ACtCtINTNUMBER INVOICE MO tJimBER MANUAL54155 1995/09/25<•>$44S.C0 $44*.00* $a«,15o.30*0569-4J4-5 14724 ^ f i.f- .. OXibCXL CHECK CUMHAKY UEU. UKl' 20. AMpmm •FUtO> i FUND # FUND • FUND « FUND I FUND I 001112421(72(71(74 999 $(9,737.93 $S1J.(4 $7,282.49 $445.20 $2.<27.55 $5,240.26 $1,989.24 $88,136.30> page 1 j li im M l:lf m Ckscii •Uta^id R«9isccir City of Oroao Social Cbocic Loc Codo 001 hmm •40043 44S4294St VSS. LIllDA t. 040339 471840071 SOSMA« JJMI L. 040340 47S3801S1 HAIXIM. OOaOTHT fl. 04C041 477443877 HASIMMf. CAftOLI k. 04CC42 477700023 MOOSSt. RONALD J. Totals ChacR Loc Coda 001 ADMIH Chacic Lae Coda 002 riNAMCt 04004S 470987727 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER K. 04C044 472500574 ICUOIIf, THOMAS M. •4C044 474846274 OLSON, JOHN C. Totals Check Loc Coda 002 FINANCE Check Loc Coda 003 POLICE 040042 334504281 hORONCZYHSEI. JAMBS 040054 448701848 PISCHENICH. DAN T. 040054 448821018 ENGLISH III. IRVING H. 040050 448843008 CARLSON. MICHAEL B. 04C052 449524024 CORNICE. JAMES L 04C044 470544529 SCHCENHOFF. JOHN B. 04C097 470544529 SCHCENHOFF. JOHN B. 040047 470704904 TOMCZYK. MARK N. 04C043 471487919 PERSELL. WILLIAM R. C40C58 471569843 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. 040047 471488040 ANDERSON. BRUCE L 040040 471849180 KNCLLENBERG. KRISTIN L. 040051 472503991 CHESWICK. GARY B 040055 472529007 FRICKSON. KURT R. 040045 472543051 THOMTCN. MARK R. 040048 474563339 BOBZIEN, SUE A. 040064 474663296 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F. C400S7 475444249 HANSING, CAROL J C4C053 475909721 DEMBCUSKI, JAY C. 040049 476921819 BORIS. SCOTT W 040059 4*’7447279 KAWIITZ. RICKY D 040041 490043542 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L. Totals Check Loc Code 003 POLICE Check Loc Cede 004 ANT?^ CTRL 041048 468113970 CALLAGHAN. JEREMIAH P 040094 469087984 GOMAN. DAVID J 04C049 470089708 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Loc Code 004 ANIMAL CTRL Security Check Check Check IKsabar Date RMOliilt Groaa 448-429488 13-Sep-95 488.44 X.071 20 471-84-0871 13 -Sep-95 201.37 597 43 475-38-OlSl 13-Sep-95 891.14 1,340.00 477-44-3877 13 -Sep-95 731 33 1.071.20 477-70-0023 13 -Sep-95 1.514.89 2,449 44 4.029 37 4,529 27 470-98 7727 13-5ap-95 823.11 1,180 80 472-J0-0J74 lJ-8ep-9S 1,223.31 2,288 48 474-84-4274 13-5ep-95 749.10 1,075.49 2.815.92 4,544 97 334-50-4281 l3-Sep-95 1.294 47 1,487.58 448-70-1848 13-Sep-95 955.02 1,581.40 448-82-1018 13 -Sep-95 478.47 1,818.84 448-84-3008 I3-Sep-95 494 21 €28 88 449-52-4024 13 -Sep-95 1,400.08 2,292.04 470-54-4529 13-Sep-95 904.12 1.307.32 470-54-4529 15-Sep-95 1,034.40 1.748.65 470-70-4904 13-Sep-95 1,104.51 1,^12.00 471-48-f9l9 13-Sep-95 70.71 ^57.22 471-56-9843 13-Sep-95 912.90 1.412.00 471.48-8C60 l3-Sep-95 549.81 2,032.93 471-84-9180 13-Sep-95 394.14 514.44 472-50-3991 13-Sep-95 1,330.84 1,945.40 472-52-9007 l3-Sep-95 1.044.35 1,612.00 472-54-3051 13-Sep-95 875.54 1,581.40 474-56-3339 13 -Sep-95 452 IS 1,175.40 4^4-66-3294 13-Sep-95 189.24 1,581.60 475-44 4243 13-S«p-95 378.22 411.64 475-98-97:1 13-Sep-95 1.258.89 1,952.30 474-92-1019 l3-Sep-95 785.12 1,254.58 477-64-7279 13 -Sep-95 251. .4 284.37 480-84-3542 l3-Sep-95 403 74 1,697 05 16.792.33 30.711 24 448-11-3070 13 -Sep-95 322 17 405.05 469-38-7004 14 - Sep-95 23 09 25.00 470-08-9709 13-Sep-95 153.57 193.20 490 03 623.25 [3 isn m 1:2« fw K^fUter City of Otom SoeUl hcck Cc^Xoytfi Runbey Cnq^IoyM Kmm hmek Loc Code QOS BIDG/ZCHISR3 40071 1212624X7 H&BU5TB. J£A^ A. 40070 46S686562 Qt^mOiS, MICHAEL P 40072 47Q700S01 QH&S. LTLE 1. 40073 47SSCS292 VAX, hSilXX L. 40074 477881539 WECKMAN, STEPO^ J Total® Check. Loc Code 005 BLC-G/2C»I!IG h4Ck Loc Code 006 PUBLIC HORKS 40076 40079 40083 40081 40092 40077 40075 40080 40078 heck Loc Code 007 -COLF 468420832 468909535 469629194 469948107 473746173 474667812 475443862 476783251 477500666 40090 40084 40087 40085 40089 40088 40086 40091 468320409 RUTHER. ALVIN C. 468622^^40 ERICKSON, DOUGLAS J. 473108428 CAS, OANIE^. 0. 473141624 JOSTROM. FOREST J. 473609629 ROSS, JOHN A 474167795 PETERSON, JACK W. 475344512 MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E. 475569177 STEFFENliAGEN, RONALD S Totals Check Loc Code 0C7 OCLF heck Loc Code 008 CCLTiCIL Page 2 Security Check Check Check Date Amount Groaa 121262417 13-Sep-9S 1. •'3.42 1.948 08 46968-6S62 13-Sep-95 909 25 1,555 52 478-70-0901 13-Sep-95 1, :96 40 i,S55.S2 475-50-5292 13-Sep-95 913 25 1,340.00 477-88-1539 13-Sep 95 60.15 1,242.48 4,172 47 7,641 60 GERHARDSON, JOHN R.468 420832 13-Sep-35 1.279 39 2.357 74 OBERAIC3IER, SCOTT 0-468-90-9535 13-Sep-95 820.52 1,144.00 5KREEN, DALE S.469-62-9194 13-Sep-95 767.26 1.401.40 PALMER, GREGORY A 469-94-9107 13-Sep-95 721.05 1.315.60 RATHBUM, BARRY J.473-^4-6173 13-Sep-9$864.67 1. 144.00 GREGORY, JAMES D.474-66-7912 13-Sep-95 606.39 1. 163 20 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F.475-44-3862 l3-Sep-95 1,100.37 1.701.48 OBRIEN. RANDY L.476-78-3251 l3-Sep-95 98.42 1,144.00 HANSEN. STEVTN C.477-50-0666 13-Sep-95 680.91 1,144.00 Loc Code 006 PUBLIC WORKS 6,938.98 12,515.42 468-32-0409 13-Sep-95 64.88 71.25 468-62-2840 13-Sep-95 100.61 110.50 473-10-8428 13-Sep-95 304.84 334 00 473-14-1624 13-Sep-95 192.75 21T.70 473-60-9629 13-Sep-95 129.38 142.10 474-16-7795 l3-Sep-95 307.89 347.70 475-34-4512 13-Sep-95 277.24 304.50 475-56-9177 13-3ep-95 981.50 1.340.00 2,359.09 2,862.55 40035 019324677 GOETTEN, J. DIANN 018-32-4677 ll-Sep-95 223.19 241.67 40034 469189026 CALLAHAN JR . . EDWARD J .469-16-6026 ll-Sep-95 220.65 300.00 40036 470366069 KURR. JCELLEN L,470 36-6069 ll-Sep-95 223.19 241.67 40037 473646272 JABBCUR, GABRIEL 473-64-6272 11 Sep-95 223.19 241.67 40038 476527196 •^.ELLEY. CHARLES 476-52-‘^186 ll-5ep-95 223.19 241.67 Totals Check Loc Code 0 08 CC'JNCIL 1.113.41 1,266.68 ;rand Total 38,720.40 66,695.00 ■1 information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING OF COUNCIL MEETING SEP 2 5 1996 CfTY OF 9RONO 0^ TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator September 22, 1995 SUBJECT: Council Update 1. 2. IPetro Fund reimbursement for fuel leak clean-up at old City Hall site. The City has received reimbursement from the Petro Fund in the amount of $30,418.81 as the first and largest installment of the reimbursement for the city ’s costs related to the clean up of the underground fuel storace tanks at the old City Hall. There is additional work to be done and expenses to be incurred related to the monitoring wells on the site. When this work is completed a follow-up application for additional reimbursement will be made to the petro fund. Water plant rehabilitation report. The city has received ami reviewed the preliminar> report regarding the rehabilitation of the city ’s water plant. The report includes several suggestions for operational changes to improve the functioning of the plant. The report also identifies the major areas needing rehabilitation. The two main components of the water plant are the iron removal system and water softening system. The iron removal filter unit is potentially the most expensive, depending on the condition of its various internal components which have not yet been inspected" Bonestroo will provide a plan for investigating the condition of the various components of the iron removal filter unit. Although the water softening unit does not require expensive repairs, there are problem areas related to the water softening process. One problem is that a large amount of water is flushed into the sanitary sewer as part of the water softening cycle. This is a significant expease to the city. Also, although the city softens the water many residents also have water softeners in their homes. This .-ises wo issues; 1 ) When both the city and the residents soften water the water acmally gets too soft which causes the water to dissolve copper from th^ residential water lines causing a problem with the amount of copper in residential drinking water. 2.) If a majority of the city ’s water customers are using water softeners, the city ’s water softening may be redundant. A survey of the city ’s water customers is currently underway to detennine how many homes have water softeners. This survey will provide infonnation to assi.st in determining whether the city should stay in the water softening business, or in Coundl Update continued Sepiember 22, 1995 3. 4. 5. determining the level al which thc city should soften the Water. Infiltration and Inflow reduction. The City Council approved $15,(XX) in the 1995 Sanitary Sewer budget for infiltration and inflow (I & I) reduction efforts. Staff has concentrated its efforts in the Saga Hill area based on a prior I & I study that indicated a high level of I & I in this area. Efforts have included a major manhole inspection program by the water and sewer mainienancc staff* recalibration of litt stations to enable the analysis of pumping volumes to identify areas of high I & I. and analysis ot the manhole inspection information to identify those manholes with the highest level of inflow. The next step is to televise the sewer lines in thc area of high I & I to identify additional sources of I & 1 and to seal the lines and manholes. This work will pay for it-^df almost immediately through reduced sewer treatment charges. Saga Ilill park land acquisition. The Saga Hill residents have provided earnest money to the Midway Bank, owners of the propert> to be acquired for park land, in exchange for a commitment from the Bank to extend the purchase date to December 31, with an additional two month extension possible with additional earnest money. The price for the land is $145,000. Because the Legislature placed a $50,000 cap on the amount of individual grants to be made through the grant program, the Saga Hill group is try ing to raise the remaining $95,OCX). If they cannot raise the full $95,000 the land purchase may need to be split into two parts. One $100,000 piece in 1995 and one $45,000 piece in 1996. Thij would involve the city applying for an additional $22,500 grant in 1996 to he matched by the residents for the purchase of the final piece. At this lime the Saga Hill group has not been successful in obtaining any large grants. However, they are optimistic about several potential donors. The Saga Hill group also has contacts in the park land acquisition grant progiam who indicate the Saga Hill project is very high on the priority list. They expect the $50,000 grant to be awarded to the city. Update regarding health concerns at 1972 Shadyxvood Road. The health concerns at 1972 Shadywood Road (thc Nchring pro{;ert>') have now been fully addressed. The pest control service has completed its work. There are no signs of active roilcnts on the Nchring property' or on the propenies adjacent. The County and the city vvill continue to closely monitor the activities on the Nehring property. % Council Update continued September 22, 1995 6. 7. 8. Proposed semaphore at Highway 12 and Wayzata Boulevard. Mayor Callahan has expressed the city ’s concerns regrading the proposed semapnore at Wayzata Boulevard and ^'ghway 12 to Valerie Reinaas of MnDOT. Valerie has provided the name of the person to whom we need to express our objections. I will be working with the Police Chief to prepare information outlining the city ’s concerns regarding the proposed semaphore. Ma3cwell Bay access. Mike Gaffron, John Gerhardson and I met with Larry Killien of the DNR on Wednesday, September 13 regarding the status of the Maxwell Bay access project. The DNR is working toward getting an application to the Planning Commission in November. This will require two meetings with the Lake Use Committee prior to November. One meeting will be to discuss "use” issues. The other meeting will be to discuss the design of the access. We discussed the roadway improvements needed for the .access; including the right fum lane from North Shore Drive to Tonkawa Road and into the access, and the left Uim bypass lane on east bound North Shore Drive. Mr. Killien indicated that the County can install the bypass lane on east bound North Shore Drive. Tlie installation of the right turn lane is a more significant project and will i .'quire additional discussion with the County. On Thursday, September 14 Gary Cheswick, Mayor Callahan and I met with the Mayors of Long Lake and Spring Park for the quarterly police contract cities meeting. Mayor Nancy Check of Minnetonka Beach had planned to attend but was called away to an emergency. The first item on the agenda was a follow up on items from the previous meeting. These included emergency medical response as it relates to the Orono Police Officers as first responders, emergency preparedness and the development of an emergency response check list and drug enforcement. The next discussion item was training for bar owners and employees regarding under-age drinking. We then updated the cities regarding discussions with the city of Wayzata tor cooperative police serv ices and the status of the l.ake Minnetonka Area Police Services Study. The final agenda item was comments and questions from the police cities. The two mayors indicated general satisfaction with the quality of police service. Mayor Olson ot Lone Lake identified two issues. The first, is that there is a perception that the visibility of police officers in downtown and in the parks is not as high as it should be. The second, is that there has been discussion among the Councilmembers regarding the two supplemental officers provided to Long Lake under the contract in addition to the "basic" coverage, questions have been raised regarding why Long Lake needs supplemental officers while Orono has only basic coverage. (Gary Cheswick and I have met with Council Update continued September 22, 1995 9. Long Lake Councilracmbcrs Mike Bash and Liz Olson to discuss and tr> to clarify this issue. We plan to have a follow-up meeting to provide further information and further clarification.) Bill Wear shopping center fuel storage tank leak clean up. A number of years ago leakage from the fuel storage tanks at Bill Wear’s shopping center was identified. In the past year Mr. Wear has been working with a consultant to develop a plan and process for cleaning up the leak. The process involves pumping the contaminated watei from underground into a set of processing tanks that are designed to separate the contaminants from the water. Recently a City of Long Lake Public Works staff person noticed that some trenching was being done on the Wear property. It appeared to be for the purpose of connecting to t e newlv installed storm sewer line along Highway 12. The Long Lake City Administrator has expressed a concern that the contaminated water not be allowed to be piped into the storm sewer, which eventually ends up in Long Lake. Lyle Oman the city s Chief Building Official has followed up with both the PCA and Bill Wear’s clean up consul^t to ensure contaminated water is not and will not be piped into the new storm sewer. The PCA has indicated that Mr. Wear has a permit that allows him to pump the processed water into either the storm sewer or the sanitary sewer depending on the level to which the water is cleaned of contaminants. The citv recently received a trail grant in the amount of approximately $18,000 for the construction of a bike trail to connect the existing bike trail at the south end of the Dickey property to the Luce Line Trail. Tliis is a 50% matching grant. This work will be completed this fall. V I w TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator September 22. 1995 SUBJECT: Update Regarding City Attorney Expenses Related to the MPRS Lawsuit In response to a question by Councilmember Hurr, I have attached infoimation regarding the costs incurred Ly the city for the City Attorney ’s assistance regarding the MPRS lawsuit. The total amount expended from October ot 1994 through April of 1995 was $12,548. J. Mayeron is an attorney specializing in employment law. MAIK, SCHfM06RlCh, A KAU»=iVIAN, I- fU ./ Zlienc No; 03643 rity of Orona nc.ali i • w MINNEAPOUS OFFICE 3300 PfPEW JAFFHAY TOWER 222 SOCrm 9TM STREET MtNNEAPCUS. MINNESOTA S5402 TELEPHONE 612-333-4800 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 telephone WASHINGTON OFFICE ^ 65S 15TH STREET N.IN SUITE 800 WASHINGTON. O.C 20006 TELEPHONE 202-824.8000 MIAMI offk :e 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100SE SECOND STREET MIAMI. FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE 303883-1200 LU 306-S330CS0 June 30, 1995 Invoice Mo. 2443C62 ?GR IICN WITH RE\*ITTANCc For professional services rendered, including: totter No.: 03643.119 Starks v MN Police Recruitment 03/21/95 K. Staunton D3/21/95 7. Barrett 04/10/95 K. Staunton 34/10/95 T. Barrett 34/12/95 K. Staunton 34/ij-':5 K. Staunton Review and analyze supplemental discovery; confer with Attorney LeFevere regarding responses and missing documents; clarify cur role as co-counsel in correspondence to Attorneys LeFevere, Patton and Anderson; discuss strategy with TJBarrett regarding scope of acceptable discovery. Analyze and prepare trial issues . Confer with TJBarrett regarding strategy for representation of City in damages phase of the trial; confer with co-counsel LeFevere regarding same; identify damages sought and statutory provisions governing same. Analyze and prepare trial issues . Review and analyze draft responses to interrogatories from tne plaintiffs; work on research of elements of damage calculations . Work on analysis of law governing damages; search for caselaw involving conflicts between joint powers entities 2.7 5.0 2.2 5.0 i . b 3.4 Popham. Haik. Schnobrich. & Kaufman. LTD. 3300 Piper Jaftray Tower • 222 So. 9th St. • Mmneaoolis. MN 55402 rf CCA4L i 0 MUMfiPQ 4I-0M^88S ; A ^ HAIK, SCHN08RICH, & KAUhiVlAiM, *- ‘ client No: 03643 «lty of Orona :4/15/95 K. Staunton 04/15/95 T. Barrett 04/17/95 K. Staunton 04/18/95 K. Staunton 04/19/95 K. Staunton 04/26/95 K. StaUilton 04/28/95 K. Staunton Total Hours: Amount Due Professional Sen'/ices: Expenses Advanced: 04/30/95 Westlaw mmncapcus office 3300 FIFCR JAFFnAV TOIMER Za SOUTH *TH STHEET UmMEAFOUS. M»<NESOTA S54(a TELEPHONE t13 333-*a00 «VASH iSGTC^» Ccess 15TH STREET N W SUITE 800 WASKNGTON. 0 & 20Q0S TP*‘-?*-3NE 4.. DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER COtCRAOO 80202 telephone paqe 30>893>1200 MIAMI OFFICE 4000 INTERNATKDNAL PLACE 100 S.E SECOND STREET MIAMI. FI OmOA 33131 TELEPHONE 305-S30-0050 June 30, 1995 Invoice No. 2443062 .=L=.43H -STUr.N 'HIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE and individualcities; research standards for monetary damages. Work cn analysis of law governing available remedies for violations of the Minnesota Human Rights «ct. Analze and prepare trial issues. Confer with Charlie LeFevere regarding status of case and hearing scheduled with judge regarding discovery dispute; review and analyze discovery responses. Confer with Attorney LeFevere regarding hearing on discovery dispute and other strategy items. Confer with Attorney Mac ^eFevre and Charles LeFevere regarding status of trial calendar. Confer with Mr. LeFevre regarding status of proceeding and strategy for oroceeding; arrange for time CO review documents in file. Meet with Charlie LeFevere and Mac LeFevre to review file and develop strategy for second state of trial; work on analysis of same. Westlaw Charges - 04-12-95 Popham. Haik. Schnobrich, & Kaufman. LTD. 3300 Piper Jatfray Tower • 222 So. 9th St. • Minneapolis. MN 55402 2.0 5.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 3.2 32.3 3.380.00 259.73 fEO£RALiO number 4 OPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD.fUaifTTO MINNCAPOUS OFFICE 3300 JAFF?UY TOWER 222 SOUTH STH STREET MINNEAPOUS. MNNE90TA SS4Q2 TELEPHONE 612-333-4S00 WASHINGTON OFFICE 655 ISTH STREET N.W. SUITE 600 WASHmGTON. O.C 20006 TELEPHONE 202^4-6000 Client No: 03643 City of Orona DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER COLORADO 60202 TB^EPHONE „ 303-693-1200 Page MIAMI CFFICS 4000 1NTERNATX)NAL PLACE 100 S E. SECOND STREET MiAML FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE 305-S3G0060 June 30, 1995 Invoice No. 2443062 PLEASE -piiS PCRTiCN '.VITH REMITTANCE 04/30/95 Westlaw 04/30/95 Photocopy Westlaw Charges - 04-15-95 Photocooies frctn 04-12-95 thm 04-1-.-95 157.60 1.60 Total Expenses Advanced Total This Matter 418.93 Attorney Hours Worked Billed Per Hour Bill Amount Senior Attorney Barrett. T 15.00 110.00 1.650.00 Subtotal:15.00 1,650.00 Associate Staunton 17.30 100.00 1,730.00 Subtotal;17.30 1,730.00 Total 32.30 3,380.00 J' Popham, Haik. Schnobnch, & Kaufman. LTD. ,f O-» O* . k 4 i — — o ^o I i C FLccflALio NUMeep / POW«AM,- HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD.REMIT TO mmneapous omcs 3300 PIPER JAFFRAV TWER 222 SOUTH 9TM STT^ET MINNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA 554® telephone 612'53>4S00 WASMINGTCN OFFICE 699 19TH STREET HW SUfTESOO WASHINGTON. 0 C. 20009 TELEPHONE 2C2®4»iOOn client No: 03543 City of Orcna DENVER CrFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 90202 telephone 30>99>l^ irayc MIAMI OFFICE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S E SECOND STREET Ml AML FLORIDA 33131 , TELEPHONE XE 530-0050 April 20, 1995 Invoice No. 1692783 For professional seir/ices rendered, including: PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE Matter No.: 03643.119 Starks v MN Police Recruitnent 03/23/95 T. Barrett Analyze status of police joint powers litigation; review dic-overy. 4.5 Total Hours: Air.ount Due, Professional Seir/ices: Expenses Advanced; 03/31/95 Photocopy Total Expenses Advanced: 4.5 $ Senior Attorney Photocopier charges Attorney Hours Worked Billed Per Hour Bill Amount Barrett, T 4.50 110.00 495.00 Total 4.50 495.00 Total This Matter 495.00 4.20 4.20 Popham, Haik, Schnobnch. & Kaufman, LTD. FtOeWL IO NUMMB POPHAM, HAIK, SCMNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD Client No: 3643 City of Orono For professional services rendered, including ROUT TO MflWEAROUS OFFICC 3S» WP€R jrffray tower 222 SOUTX 9TH STREET MlNNEAPOUS. MRINCSOTA 5S402 TEIEPHORE 6^2 333-AaOO DENVER OFFICE !200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE 303-893-'200 WASHINGTON OFFICE 655 15TH STREET NW SUITE 800 WASHINGTON. D C. 200C5 TELEPHONE 202-824^000 MIAMI CFFICE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE ^ '00 SE^^ONO STREET rag^lAlil^XORlOA 33131 TELEPHONE 3C5-530^3050 February 28. 1995 SErjRN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE Matter No.: 03643.119 Starks v MN Police Recruitment 01/20/95 K. Staunton Confer with TJBarreit regarding status of liugation; identify upcoming events per the Scheduling Order. Total Hours:0.2 Amount Due. Professional Services:s Expenses Advanced: 01/31/95 Photocopies Total Expenses Advanced:s ♦ ****SUMMARY B Y ATTORNEY***Ar P Attorney Hours Billed Worked Per Hour Bill Amount K. Staunton .20 80.00 O II O•VOss = = = = * = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Total all Attorneys IIIIIIIIIIII• Itto ItO 11111111111111IIIIIIIIII1111116.00 Total This Matter $18.80 Popham. Halk. Schnobnch, & Kaufman, LTD. • • • T c• 0.2 16.00 2.80 (^2.8^ ^€D€*1ALI0 NUMBCA POPr^MUr, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD. CUentNo: 3643 A£MIT TOMOUNCAPOUS OFFICE 3900 JAFF^Y TOWEH 222 SOUTH fTVI STWEET MlRKiAFOUS. MW#l€90TA 55402 T elephone 912-333-4000 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 90202 TELEPHONE 303-W3-1200 mSHINQTON OFFICE 1300 I STREET N.W. surn sooEAST WASHINGTON. O.C. 2000S TELEPHONE 202-0i2-i700 MIAMI OFFICE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S.E. SECOND STREET MIAMI. FL 33131 TELEPHONE Page: City of Orono Januaiy 20. 1995 =LE.ASE =ETL'?>J "THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE For professional services rendered, incladin Matter No: 119 Starks v MN Police Recruitment 12/05/94 T. Barrett 12/08/94 T. Barrett 12/08/94 J. Mayeron 12/09/94 J. Mayeron 12/12/94 J. Mayeron (Starks) Analyze facts and law; determine strategy. (Starks) Analyze facts and law: determine strategy. Conference with Ron Moorse and Chief Sullivan regarding method by which Orono selects part-time and full-time police officers. Conference with Tom Barrett regarding discussion with Chief Sulliv'an and Ron Moorse regarding selection procedure and options for handling procedure; research validation procedures. Research necessity for posting and performing validation procedure for instituting affirmative action policy; conference with Personnel Decisions, Inc. regarding cost of pursuing validation study: conference with Chief Sullivan regarding questions relaung to Orono ’s hiring procedures of police officers: prepare memo reearding analvsis and options w w • A 2.5 2.5 1.7 1.4 5.3 Popham. Haik, Schnobrich, & Kaufman. LTD. 3300 P'D<?r Jaffrav Tower • 222 So. 9th St. • MlnneabOlis. MN 55402 FEOCRALIO NUMetA ji HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD.REMIT TO MINNEAPOUS OfFiCg 5300 PIPER JAFFRAY T0¥^ 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET MIHNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 012.333-4000 WASHINQTON OFFlCr^ 1»01 STREET nw. sun SOO EAST WASHINGTON. D C. 2»09 TELEPHONE 202-M2-0730 CHenlxNo: 3643 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUTE 2400 DENVER. COLUUOO 20202 TELEPHONE Pase: 15 MiAMormcE 4000 MTEW4ATX9NM. FIACS 100 S E. SECOND STNCET MIAMI, n. 33131 TELEFHOW 30S-UO-0000 City of Orono January 20, 1995 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE 12/13/94 J. Maveron Conference regarding City Council meeting and reaction to options with respect to use of validation study or possible affirmative action program in the future in connection with hiring of parttime officers. Total Hours:13.7 Amount Due, Professional Services ♦ ♦♦♦♦summary by attorney ♦ * * ♦ ♦ Attorney Hours Worked Billed Per Hour Bill Amount J. Mayeron T. Barrett SSSSS3SSSSSS53SSSaBSSZ=: = Total all Attorneys 8.70 5.00 sssaa 13.70 110.00 110.00 :=s = asssasaa ssa 110.00 957.00 550.00 sasssssss 1,507.00 Total This .Matter $1,507.00 Kies .3 $1,507.00 Popham. Haik. Schnobnch. & Kaufman. LTD. nnrn Differ J;?ffrav Towpr • 222 So 9th St. • Minneaoolis. MN 55402 ^COCVLIO NUMBER 4 HAIK, SCHNOBRiCH, & KAUFMAN, LTD, Client No: 3643 REMIT TO MMNEArajS OFFICE 3300 F«R JAFFRAY TOWER 223 SOUTH «TN STREET MfMNEAFOUS, MWINESOTA 0& TELEPHONE 612-333-4000 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUTTE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 60202 TELEPHONE 303-693-1200 WASMMQTON OFFICE 1300 I STREET N.W. SUITE 500 EAST WASHINGTON. O a 20009 TELEPHONE 2Q2-W-6700 MIAMI OFFICE 4000 international PLACE 100 S E SECOND STREET MIAMI. FL 33131 TELEPHONE , ^.306-530-0060Page: 16— City of Orono January 20. 1995 =L=.A3E RETL'RM THIS PORTiON WITH PEMITTA^JCE For professional services rendered, including: Matter No: 120 Ronald Jones v MPRS 12/18/94 K. Staunton 12/21/94 K. Staunton Work on letter to Attorney Greene regarding appearance as co-counsel, Confer with Attorney Baker regarding coordination of roles as co-counsel: draft letter to Mr. Baker memorializing the discussion. .6 Total Hours: Amount Due. Professional Services: .8 S80.00 ♦ F ** * SUMMARY BY ATTORNEY***** Attorney Hours Worked Billed Per Hour Bill Amount K. Staunton .80 100.00 80.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-=3=========» =======»==== ===a===s===== ============ Total all Attorneys -80 100.00 80.00 o6^'0 Total This Matter ^ $80.00^ Popham, Haik. Schnobrich, 4 Kaufman. LTD. -nnn p:nof .|gnr:iv Tower • 222 So. 9th St. • Minneaoolis. MN 55402 FIOCRAL 10. number 41-0MTW6 OPH/yM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD,REMIT TO MINNCAPOUS OFFICE 3X« PIPER JAFFRAY TQWER 222 SOUTH 9TM STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612-335-4000 WASHINGTON OFFICE ^ 1300 I STREET N W. SUITE 500 EAST WASHINGTON. 0 C. 2000S TELEPHONE 202-362-6700 CEN OFFICE 1290 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 2ENVER. COLORADO SQ2C2 TELEPHONE 303-693-1200 Client No: 3643 Page MIAMI OFRCE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S E. SECOND STREET MIAMI. FL 33131 TELEPHONE 305-530-0050: 13”*-“^ City of Orono December 22. 1994 3; --£5 T'—I3 ^CnT'CN WITH nEMI i »Ar%Cc For professional services rendered, includin Matter No: 119 Starks v MN Police Recruitment 11/01/94 T. Barrett 11/03/94 J. Mayeron 11/08/94 J. Mayeron 11/08/94 J. Mayeron 11/08/94 K. Staunton 11/11/94 J. Mayeron 11/14/94 J. Mayeron Analyze and develop facts in police lawsuit. Conference with Charles LeFevere, counsel for MPRS, regarding issues raised by Judge Solum s decision and strategy for future handling. Prepare memorandum regarding status of investigation in preparation for city council meeting; conference with Tom Barrett and Kevin Staunton regarding outstanding issues with respect to lawsuit. Prepare memorandum regarding status of investigation in preparation for city council meeting; conference with Tom Barrett and Kevin Slauion regarding outstanding issues with respect to lawsuit Confer with Mr. Barrett and Ms. Mayeron regarding strategy for proceeding. Conierence with Kevin Staunton regarding municipalities liability under Minnesota Human Rights Act and effect of statutory cap; edit memo regarding issues and analysis. Conference with Charlie LeFevre regarding questions related to handling of lawsuit and status of motion; 5.0 2.6 3.4 3.4 1.2 4.8 2.7 Popnam, Haik. Schnobfich. & Kaufman. LTD. C» • ' P€D€*UliO NUM6£« ’OPHAM,' HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD. Client No: 3643 City of Orono 11/14/94 K. Staunton 11/15/94 J. Mayeron 11/15/94 K. Staunton 11/16/94 K. Staunton 11/30/94 J. Mayeron 11/30/94 K. Staunton Total Hours: .-\niount Due, Protessional Scrv'ices R€MIT TO MINNEAPOLIS OPPKTE 3300 PiPEP JAPPI^AV TOWEP 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 telephone 612-333-aOOO WASHINGTON OPF1CS 1300 I STPEET N W SUITE SOO EAST WASHINGTON. 0 C 2000S TELEPHONE rQ2-9W-aroo OE-VVEP OFPICH 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE 3C3-S93-12W MIAMI OFFICE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S E SECOND STREET MIAMI FL 33131 TELEPHONE 30S-S30-0050 Page: 14 December 22. 1994 = .=.-3= THIS PCP>’'Cri WITH n5M17-A.\C3 conference with Kevin Staunton and Tom Barrett regarding issues with respect to insurance, cap on liability, judge's Order, MPRS’s motion to modify Order, edit memorandum summarizing same. Work on immunity and insurance issues: work on preliminary assessment of issues for council. Consider issues raised from outcome of council meeting. Work on arranging for entering an appearance as co-counsel, obtaining relevant documents, and analyzing apportionment of damages. Confer with Mr. Lefevre regarding mechanics of entering an appearance as co-counsel, scheduling, and strategy; communicate results of that conversation to Janie Mayeron and Thomas Barrett. Conference with Kevin Staunton resardina substitution of attorneys on behalf W ^ of Orono, new suit against Orono, status ot order to modify findings pending final Judgment and insurance issues. Work on notice of appearance; confer with .Attorney Greene regarding joining in second case. 28.6 3.0 .0 .8 .6 .a .0 $3,085.00 Poptiam. Haik. Schnobrich. & Kaufman, LTD. ^tCCPALfO KUM96F 4»-0»4rAa5 T.*.. O' • Co QlH Cl • '4innoa*^'^l»q A •OPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD Client No: 3643 REWIT TO MlflNE-^US OFFICE 3300 PtPER JAFFRAY TOWER 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55A02 TELEPHONE 612<333-a000 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE 30WW-I200 Page WASHINGTON OFFk:E 1300 I STREET N W. SUITE 500 EAST WASHINGTON. D C. 20005 TELEPHONE 202<962-S700 MIAMI OFFICE 40n0 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S E. SECOND STREET MIAMI. FL 33131 TELEPHONE 30S-S30-C050: 15 City of Orono December 22. 1994 r. =iC£ =ET’u.=.r: Tr-lS PCRTICN '.VITH .PE\:iTTA.\CS Expenses Advanced: 11/30/94 Photocopies 4.40 Total Expenses Advanced: Total This Matter $3,089.40 S4.40 oo Popham. Haik. Schnobrich, & Kaufman. LTD. X^..,or . OOO Cn Qf • 'Itnnoannlj^ MN 55^02 PECCRAL I 0 NUMBCA ■»0PHAM; HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, & KAUFMAN, LTD.REMIT TO MINNEAROtiS OFFICE 3300 PIPEB JAFFRAV TOWER 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 telephone 612-^133-4800 DENVER OFFICE 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2400 DENVER. COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE 303-883-1200 WASHINGTON OFFICE 13001 STREET N.W. SUITE 500 EAST WASHINGTON. 0 0. 20m TELEPHONE 202-M4-8700 MIAMI OFFICE 4000 INTERNATIONAL PLACE 100 S.E. SECOND STREET MIAML FL 33131 TELEPHONE 30S-S30-O0S0 Client No: 3643 Page: 12 City of Orono November 16, 1994 ==-_=•■; "HiS rCRTICN WITH .REMITTA.\C = For professional services rendered, includin Matter No: 119 Starks v MN Police Recruitment 10/07/94 T. Barrett 10/10/94 K. Staunton 10/12/94 K. Staunton 10/14/94 J. .Vlayeron 10/14/94 K. Staunton 10/17/94 J. .Mayeron 10/17/94 K. Staunton 10/18/94 T. Barrett 10/19/94 J. Mayeron 10/19/94 K. Staunton Review pleadings, trial findings and conclusions in police w recruitment cases. Review and analyze Coun order in Starks v. Nlinnesoia Police Retirement System; confer with Attorney LeFevere regarding status. Identify issues needing to be e.xamined regarding damages and potential future actions. Review Judge Solum’s decision on discrimination Analyze potential issues regarding ongoing testing, appealability and damages; confer with Mr. Lefevre regarding same. Review decision by Judge Solum; consider options as a result of decision Review and analyze Judge Solum’s opinion. .Analyze reach of injunctive relief: compare with other similar cases. Consider optioiis with respect to Judge Solum’s decision. Identify issues to be 3.5 1.1 .4 3.7 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.5 .6 1.2 Pophatn. Haik, Schnobnch. & Kaufman, LTD. . 000 Qo Qih Cl . M<npots'-‘r>i|q V<M SR<1D2 f€C3€PALlO NUMECil OPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBFMCH, & KAUFMAN, LTD REMIT TO MINNEAPOLIS 3300 PtPER JAFFRAY TOWER 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5S402 TELEPHONE 6l2«333-*a(30 DENVER OFFICE 1200 seventeenth street SUITE 2*00 DENVER. COLORADO 50?C2 TELEPHONE 303-d9S>i2O) WASHINGTON OFFICE 1300 I STREET NW SUITE ;00 EAST WASHINGTON 0 C 200C5 TELEPHONE 202-962-4700 MIAMI OFC'CE 4000 international place 100 S E second street MIAMI. FL 33131 TELEPHONE 30S-530-0050 Client No: 3643 Pa«e: 13 City of Orono November 16, 1994 THiS RC hi .VI < H nc ..! I 10/20/94 J. Mayeron Total Hours: .Amount Due. Professional Ser\'ices: addressed. Consider issues with respect to insurance coverage, Orono’s intention with respect to hiring; conference with Tom Barrett regarding same. 10/20/94 K. Staunton Confer with Ron Moorse regarding various issues; analyze letter to MPRS. ^ 10/21/94 T. Barrett Analyze limits of City damage liability; consider issues of injunctive relief. 10/23/94 K. Staunton Analyze municipal Tort Liability cap implications for potential damages. 10/24/94 T. Barrett Analyze police litigation; discussion with Mayor regarding strategy; develop issue of damage liability/soveirgn immunity. 10/24/94 J. Mayeron Conference with Ed Callahan regarding status of investigation in connection with suit 10/25/94 T. Barrett .Analyze injunctive relief regarding .scope of claim; review letters of Mr. .Morris; substitution of attorney issues. 10/27/94 T. Barrett Analyze issue of City monetary’ liability under Minnesota Federal Civil Rights Act. 10/31/94 T. Barrett .Analyze status of police litigation. a.j.2 Total This Matter OCSO Popham. Haik, Schnobneh. & Kaufman, LTD. S3.571.00 .8 .6 1.5 .8 2.0 .4 2.3 4.0 2.0 S3.571.00 I 0 NUMBtfl 41-0947885 / f CPEN LETTER TO THE MEV5ERS CF THE CITY CCUNC:LS REPRESENTED CN THE LAKE MINNETONKA CCNSERVAT'CN DiSTRiOT Tre LMCD is corrpcsed cf recresentatives cf an ccmmuriitiea that border on the lake. The original intent was tnat a ces^gnatec E lEC ’ED ccurciicerson Her each corrmurnty s't on tre LMCD beard Cur'ently a S’gnificar: ■'.-ce' are rcr-eected =' o' to this year He 'eo'ese-tatives were appointed to an 'cn-c ad t^nee ,car te'~ ““a^ks to the e'^ons cf State Represen.aove^^cd /an Caien and escec.aii/ State Se^a'cr Oe'* Cisen trat nas been cnangeo -jcw any recresentative can be 'e'^ovec at a"y t n'e py ~'3;crty vcte cf tne acce rti-'g city cconcii . h:s can be a COOP e-eeged swore pot f' s s'O-.c ~3Ke tre LMCD r-cre accoui'tao'.e to He wishes Oi tr.e people That e t^.e pHerent c.ty cc-nc s Kf iCW what oViCD is doing The -aK6 MinnetcnKa Consen’aticr D st'.ct 'ecent;/ voted against the establishment of a quiet water zone n the sout''e'n part o* V.'est A'm pay This s He secc'*d ,e3' -n a row that .“^e issue has bee- orcoght oo anc voted dcwn a-- ppnpe'hed t^at the LMCD 'eb'eseHatwes have not re'^Phe'* '^a^K *p p^ 'ece^vec pnect cn Hpm **'■3 ' 'escectwe city ccu c s -once^htn^ ... is mc.v.er the facts 'oere Known s-scect t ..-co.c "ave '.v.despreac supcon The area m question measo'es 'oogn.y 3C: 0/ 9GC ,a'cs it -s ‘ian.Keo to t^e east and '.vest by r.vo otne' quiet -ater zones- cnanne s nvo;v ng tre Setpr a-d Arpoe tndges Deering 'siand. m Crono defines tne ncr.ne'n pc^nca''/ a ong with Sh.ao,'wood •-'C^t m, V cuhd ‘hr.e scut .ern snore of West Arm pay lies in Spring -ark _ Cn a holiday v/eeKend, the nompe' of boats Hat pass cy can eas.iy exceed ^cu per npur. No otner cart cf the ake sees t- s mup- ppat t'aHc suspect that one woo.c oe -ard-oressed to fmd a-erher r-es-' -a-e' a-<e '' t^e cc-nt-. / th t-'S -'gh a 'ate cf minimally 'egu'atec beat traHc Whue -e ccr-merciai cru se vessels -ave a speed :.mit of c " es per -cur tthecreticaHy,. large pnva.e -'aft can pewe' trreug- a: a : es per -ph - the -^a.v n-pm anowaoie sceed- generating large waves n tne process Sman ‘sn -g coats sa coats and canoes get erased oh early during pr-e pcarng nou's =K3mp es cf seve'e s'c'e: ne e'cs on ca'.sed by these peat waves are -umercuS ^ he wa.er m He souther'' '.Vest Arr: -ay a'ea s ve'.- 5-3 c-v .vith cect-s 'are'y e.vceecing '2-'5 feet Muen of the lano aher the retreat of t-e giacie's >3S formed ove' ‘ ve tho'-sahd years through the process O' eutrccnicaticn- tr'e g'ac-ai oo"a-oc of sc ! H'cugh ceccs.t.cn of cecayec p_rganc matenai in this protected area waves ge'^eratec cy wmes '. keiy -ever exceeded 5 incnes oday waves rem passing Peats can eas.iy exceed 'our times tms neigr.t ‘''pm ea'o t-'e-t.etn center, su've.s ano 'Ste'^'cm —ennepm Count; ae'a* o-CkCg achs ,demc-st'3te the damage t-a: co-^e' cca: va-c 'as cc'e to f-e a'ea Deenng s.a-dVor exampie has OS’ C'.e' tn^ee ac'es of a-d c- t'e -est arc sc^t" s oes s.nce weH over cu% of its iCi.3i area VnV-e seJt-e'- s.ce c't-e s.a-d over *:c ‘eet cf shorei.-e nave oeen eaten away since 1913- 3C feet of tnat s.nce ' 960 On Shadywccc oemt t^e west ce—a -as 'cst 3C “= c' ts width - some 3C 'eet of 'and- since 19CQ Tne owne'S Hacec 'cck 'e -'c'cement -accc'd -g to Department of Nat-rai Resources ''uide'i-es- on tne snc'e' ne - '9c “ -=st .ear t' s 'c-'ac nac to oe 'e-acne at consioeraoie ixrense /vr.yn Rock orctect en can c- , ce ciacec to t'e -e^grt of f-e 'and Hat it is supposed to prerect "he -waves ge-e'atec by coats a'e -iC-ER nan the ‘and- some /ears '6 to 20 nenes highe'' ’‘-e /ater .vas'es cve' t'e 'cck cestrcyi-g t-e vegetation ce,c-a tne rccK anp eventually .vasn.ng t-e sc awa, ,f anyone dooots tne cower of coat vaves to eroce src'e .nes .arc ncice-tai.y greatly decrease waVr quaiit/j Here s an exce"e-t st.c,. scc-sored by t-e CNR Hat has ceen 'ecentiy pucushed It IS entitled "Recreatic-a'Boating "^oact ''vesegat en written by Scot Jonnsen puplis .ee n ^ecrua'-y “'99A Coces ca- be cotamed by caii.ng tne DNR at 3A5-56C1 ■yvny aces tne uMCD ' ct ..-ant a c- et water zone estac.,sr,eo .n tne area'’ Are commercial interests navmg 3 stronger -.fiue-ce t-a- tney snouic'’ Slowing the boats cown would mean an e>!'3 6-3 ~ r.-es tc t'2ve'se ‘.f'e area gcrg east-^vest !s a S'S-'ifcant r.ccjen ence'’ VVii! f s ce ay r^a^e recp'e ate ‘cr .'/ex'' 's:e *e d rv'e' at Lore '■ etC'“iS''S'’ '$ speec ■*’.=A,— r'at important to erjC/ing t!-e :3ke" , ^ I .vc-!C '.xe to rat t '■/>li -ot ta^e a ooat ng t'agecy to --aKe tre LVv^u- estao is.. a Quiet vvate'' zone .n tre scotrern West A'rr. pa/ area -'O'.vever v/?'aie\'e'’ the -.' mate c-tceme c. t. .'S soec.MC issue < r-coe trat tre vanous c;t/ roorp s abound tre iake "^ake su*e tnat t^e actions of tnetr _MCD 'ep'esemat ;e acco^ate;/ 'ejects tne'visres a-c oes ^es c^t-en :ommun;ty ana tnat recresentati've 'econ.s 03C.-< 'eg-'an/ a^d accurately on tne ssues oe o e . e _MCu Steve am.es CrC'Cl vmms ISSUED/FEES CX5LLECTED'REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 09/01/95 PERMIT type; Building •^GL FAMILY-NEW ^>F-ADD/REMODEL f>F-ACC STRUCTURE UEMO/PRINCIPAL '^OM-ADD/REMODEL INST-ADD/REMODEL INST-ACC STRUCT DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING FIREPLACE VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer k Water QTY 3 31 3 1 1 2 0 1 1 43* 7 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 17* 14 1 1 1C* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ('ROtF"-- CURRENT RANGE - 08/01/95 - Ofl/31/95 BASE FEE 5 C 616 526 75 25 341.25 50.00 162 2 74 0 30 25 50 00 00 137.25 338.25* 691 105 231 35 0 0 0 0 11 00 25 00 00 00 00 00 1.062.36* 750.94 133.00 35.00 91R . <’4 * VALUATION 931,000.00 520.111.00 19,300.00 0.00 10,000.00 16 , O'^O . 9C 0.00 0.00 7,450.00 1.503.861.00 54.088.00 5.635.00 13.050.00 2.075.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.848.00* 4 0,64 .1.67 0.00 1.000.00 4 1 .643.67* SEWER CONNECTION 4 14 0 0 0 0.00 WATER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 4 400.00 0.00 URNFLD (,/OR TANK 1 50.00 0.00 ONLY 6 5,100.00 0.00 SEWER k WATER 0 0.00 0.00 Sub-VotaI 15*5,690.00*0.00* • iqn PER./FREE STANDG 1 35.00 0.00 •Svib- total 1*35.00*0.00‘ Uner Defined LAND ALTERATION 1 50.00 0.00 TREE REMOVAL 0 0.00 0.00 RETAINING WALLS 0 0.00 0.00 LAWN SPRINKLER 2 70.00 0.00 .Sub- total 3*120.00*0.00* Grand-total 95* *21, 164.55* •1,620,362.67* PLAN REVIEW 3 3 700 456 221 0 105 00 38 01on 46 121.71 0.00 0 09 00 21 7,775.45* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00no* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 on 00* 0.00 0 no* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* AUGUST 1995..... OTY PAGE! 1REQUESTER: CAROl.E-- PREVIOUS KAN'SE - 08/01/''4 - 09/?l/94 PASE FEE VAI.UATION 7, 77S * * 5 8,073.50 1,935,SOO.00 22 1,677.50 120,931.00 5 515.00 41,000.00 1 50.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 317.00 34,900.00 1 207.00 20,000.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 117.00 9, 904 00 36*10,957.00*2,171,115.00* 6 470.94 36,775.00 1 35.00 1,600.00 2 70.00 3,600.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 115.00 70.00 1,535.00 4 148.75 5,950.00 2 499.56 39,925.00 10*1,329.25*89,500.00* 9 627.50 40,133.23 2 314.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 11*941.50*40,133.23* 2 70.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 12 1,200.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3 2,400.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 19*3,775.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0*0.00*0.00* 2 100.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 1 54.00 3,000.00 1 35.00 0.00 6*249.00*3,000.00* 90* *17,251.75* *2,303,748.23* PLAN REVIEW 5,247 597 305 0 0 0 134 0 76 79 03 50 00 00 00 55 00 05 6,360.92* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 6,360.92** pEmrs issied /fees otj ^jctedBPORT NBR. BFBBRPTl-1 ATB OP RUN 09/01/95 BUILDINGASE FEB LAN REVIEW URCHARGE •IC. SEARCH FEE AC NVESTIGATION DEPOSIT 1AIL IN ’ i^ERMIT TOTAL 13,338.25 7,775.45 753.51 0.00 050.00 56.75 0.00 22,773.96 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 09/01/95 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN PERMIT TOTAL 21,164.55 7,775.45 819.39 0.00 050.00 56.75 0.00 22.00 30,608.14 MECHANICAL1,062.36 0.00 37.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1,112.00 PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 00/01/95 TO 08/31/95PLUMBING SEWER 6 WATER918.94 0.00 22.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 949.38 5,690.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,694 .50 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF CRONO FROM 00/01/95 TO 08/31/95 NJGUSV 1995USER120.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 122.50 PAGE: 36REQUESTER: CAROLESIGNFIRE35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 PAGE: 37 REQUESTER: CAROLE « 1 RI, SEP I,J95, 11:45 AM i-ERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF ^JOUST 1995 I'AGE 1'’ERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET'1L 01 3050 6TH AVE N01 3500 BAYSIDE RD 01 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 02 4080 BAYSIDE RD 02 3225 CASCO CIR 02 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR 02 975 TONKAWA RD 02 1153 ELMWOOD AVE 04 1291 BRIAR ST 05 4680 CREEKWOOD TR 05 1400 CHERRY TL 06 1003 COX FARM RD 06 1125 WILLOW DR N 06 3645 LYRIC AVE 06 3300 NAVARRE LA 09 2875 DEER RUM TR 09 3525 IVY PL 11 450 WOODMTLL RD 11 3264 NORTH SHORE DR 11 3700 TOCO RD 11 3460 NORTH SHORE DR ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY 43C ME 11 3496 SHORELINE DR 11 1535 MINNIE AVE 11 1820 FOX ST 11 3970 NORTH SHORE DR 11 1925 COUNTRY CLUB RDn3369CRYSTAL BAY RD 11 1755 FAGERMESS POINT RD 11 100 NORTH SH'''RE DR W 11 4220 CHIPPEWA LA 15 4520 WEST BRANCH RD 16 1685 CONCORDIA ST 17 1590 LONG LAKE Bl.vn 19 2300 WAYZATA I'LVl) 20 2420 DUNWOODY AVE 20 795 OLD CRYSTAL PAY RD 29 3605 WATERTOWN RD 29 630 DEBORAH DR 29 1695 FOX ST 29 3509 IVY PL 29 1790 SHADYWOOD RD 29 51 WILLOW DR N 29 1045 NORTH ARM DR 43C 01 2020 DEER RUM TR 01 1070 cm AVE N 01 1304 ELMWOOD AVE 01 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 1070 6TH AVE M 01 4520 WEST BRANCH RD 01 2635 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 4680 CPEEKW-'OD TR 01 2474 CARMAN ST 95/08/03 OR-007208 95/08/16 OR-007255 95/08/30 OR-007290 95/08/17 OR-007106 95/08/10 OR-007225 95/08/30 OR 007249 95/08/25 OR-007269 95/08/31 OR-007300 95/08/25 OR-007267 95/08/03 OR-007151 95/08/11 OR-007239 95/08/01 OR-007202 95/08/23 OR-007217 95/00/17 OR-007257 95/00/30 OR-007284 95/08/16 OR-007250 95/08/24 OR-00726B 95/00/01 OR-007200 95/08/01 OR-007203 95/08/03 OR-007209 95/08/07 OR 007220 95/08/08 OR-007222 95/08/09 OR 007230 95/08/15 OR-007248 95/08/21 OR-007262 95/08/21 OR-007263 95/08/24 OR-0072?! 95/00/25 OR-007274 95/08/20 OR-007276 95/08/30 OR-007289 95/08/31 OR-007299 95/08/31 OR-007301 95/08/03 OR-007212 95/08/02 OR-007190 95/08/29 OR Of 7270 4 95/08/31 OR-007279 95/08/07 OR-007216 95/08/16 OR-007218 95/08/10 OR 007234 95/08/14 OR-007241 95/08/14 OR-007242 95/08/17 OR-007256 95/f'8/23 OR-007264 15226163 14710390 15590251 OOCOOOOO 00000000 14751160 14490866 17803262 19208888 17572926 00000000 14701364 00000000 00000000 00000000 15429000 00000000 17294420 14710979 14733397 00000000 00000000 00000000 14495771 00000000 00000000 18238046 00000000 00000000 1472790C 00000000 00000000 00000000 18943276 14725715 18299500 18238046 14731765 15308479 14710532 16823369 1 1915514 14721700 NOONAN CONSTRUCTION INC KEN ROELOFS CONST INC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC TAYLOR KATHERINE JUDD INTERIORS MURPHY BROS BUKl 6 RMOLNC WESTERN CONSTRUCriON CO HEDEC.AARD CONSTRUCTION CO HAflELE HOME caRR CO DALPHIN POOL 6 SPA ED SHEP.IDAM EmERPRISES TRENDY ROOFiNC k SONS INC PLYMOUTH R(X1FIN0 SUBURBAN F.XrERlORS INC SKI,A ROOF INC, PETTY PETER BRAUN BUILT COPP THE CARPENTERS CONST CO SOUTH RIDGE COMSlRUCTION SF.LA ROOFING Ll'tlDGREM BROS REMf>DEI,lNG DAHL STEVE COtlST DANBF.RRY COMPANY DON LIND CONSTRUCTION MINNESOTA EXTERIORS PARADISE CONSTRUCTION 95/08/01 OR- 95/08/09 OR- 95/08/11 OR- 95/00/15 OR- 95/08/K. OR- 95/08/17 OR- 95/08/30 OR- 95/00/30 OR- os/o«/30 OK- 007199 007232 007237 007247 007251 007252 007280 007201 007292 35153797 35153797 35421166 15590251 34972661 34461047 15590251 37575040 38242656 M :» SEIFERT CONST M H SEIFERT CONST FLARE HTC, fc AC EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC DJ'S IITG k AC ST DONI REFRIC. I. A/C EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC DEPENDABLE HTC k AC STANDARD HRG 6 AC CO OWNER LAST NMKE7.ARBANGRRT HARRINGTON DOTZEHRCTH SAGAN HENNINGSEN HE I T CURLEY O' NEILL ZULK WILSON ERSKINE DELANEY PAS CH ROBBINS CUMMINGS WILSON NORUM FACKLER NELSON FRAHM KOISTINRN KLIEHKE ZWART FREDEEM HAGEN BOZONIE WHITE ANDERSON EAS PHAN PALM EMGMAN HERIDETH KARLEN CUTIIEART WILSON URBAN GUNSOLUS RHYLICK HERNANDEZ JOHNSON UERMADUS EASIHAN O’NEIL EDWARDS VALUATION232.000. 00425.000. 00274.000. 00 110.000. 00 62,000.00 75.000. 00 40.000. 00 40.000. 00 7.450.00 50.000. 00 7.800.00 4.210.00 1.760.00 2.000.00 2.500.00 16.000. 00 2.500.00 10,000.00 1.800.00 640.00 2,000.00 2,100.00 1,000.00 7.297.00 1.500.00 3,000.00 3.500.00 600.00 840.0" 3.000. 00 800.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 4.000. 00 12,000.00 32.000. 00 11.541.00 1.850.00 20.000. 00 12.500.00 1.673.00 8.000. 00 2,000.00 4.500.00 1.960.00 1,3CO.OO 5.000. 00 3.000. 00 2.250.00 2.075.00 1.975.00 Rl, SEP 1, 1995, 11:45 AMRRMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF ftUGUijTermit work addr nbr street rAf'.E 21995ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER (OMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONB t. I 6C 01 02 24 24 24 24 29 29 17C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 24 29 29 29 29 29 29 99 16C 2655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 4455 NORTH SHORE DR 65 WILLOW DR N 1945 EAGERNESS POINT ! 2265 NORTH SHORE DR 2615 CASCO POINT RD 4109 HIGHWOOD RD 2648 LYDIARD AVE 28 00 COUmRYSILE DR W 2635 COUNTRYSIDE DR .1 1695 FOX ST 4590 NORTH ARM DP M 2655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 4680 CREF.KWWD TR 825 OLD CRYSTAL HAY RD 2725 SHADYWOOD RD 2507 KELLY AVE 480 ORCHARD PK RD 480 ORCHARD PK RD 4182 HIGHWOOD RD 1428 BALDUR PARK RD 3005 WATERTOWN RD 34 9 WESTl.AKE ST 2990 SUSSEX PD 95/08/3095/08/08 95/08/16 95/08/30 95/08/30 95/08/31 95/08/03 95/08/08 OR-007296 OR-007226 OR-007253 OR-007293 OR-007294 OR-007295 OR-007211 OR-007227 95/08/01 OR ''07201 95/08/08 OR-007223 95/08/11 OR-007240 95/08/16 OR-007254 95/08/22 OR 007265 95/C8/29 OR-007277 S 95/08/30 OR-007298 95/08/0/ OR-007221 95/08/11 OR-00723G 85/08/C2 OR 0072C6 95/08/02 OR 007207 95/08/15 OR 007211 95/08/15 OR 007215 95/08/18 OR 007259 95/08/25 OR-007273 95/08/30 OR-007297 3493247736332561 34789558 38242656 39111041 34161299 35453797 34458585 24409030 24432921 24740202 29445399 24432921 27554268 29337200 29332836 2263B236 29332521 29332521 29337200 29337200 24721977 24738793 24409030 HEATING (i COOLING TWO FIRESIDE CORNER DITTER INC STANDARD HTG 6 AC CO CENTRAIRE INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG it CtX3LING M H SEIFERT CONST RON'S MF.CH INC AMERICAN PLUMBING SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG A-AAR<'>NS THOEN PLUMBING INC SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG vIRRRY'S PLBG fc HTG CULLIGAN DOUGS PLUMBING UOHMSON RICHARD A THOMPSON PLBG ■THOMPSON PLBG CULLIGAN CULLIGAN MADSEN PLBG k HTG CITYVIEW PLBG f. HTG AMERICAN PLUMBING ABRAHAMSON GRONHERG THIMMESII MURPHY SCANLON APPLEBAIIM FREESE El DEN EIDEH CARTIICART HAGLUND El DEN O'NEIL |)AYT( )N MEEK NADLER ANDREWS ANDREWS POON ROTN SMIEvIA ANDERSON WILDMAN u 13 075 WAY/ATA BLVD 1C 1C *:w 01 389 WESTLAKE ST 01 309 WESTI AKE ST 01 2075 DEER RUN TR 01 309 WESTLAKE ST 01 105 BEDEKWOC'D DR 01 3211 BAYSIDE RD 01 3211 BAY.S1DE RD 01 2425 NORTH SHORE DR 01 3409 EAS'TLAKE ST 01 3409 EASILAKE ST 01 2775 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 670 BIG I.SLAUD 01 130 CYGNET PL 24 2060 6TH AVE N 29 130 CYGNET PL 15C 15C »ID 01 2990 SU.S.SEX RD 01 2905 DEER RUN TR 22 4 5 FERMI)ALE GREEM 1C 3C 95/08/08 OR-007224 14789460 SIGNS UNLIMITED 95/00/02 95/00/02 95/08/03 95/08/04 95/08/04 95/00/09 95/08/10 95/00/10 95/08/15 95/00/18 95/08/21 95/08/25 95/08/20 95/08/15 95/08/31 CR 007204 OR-007205 ('R 007210 OR 007214 OR 007219 OR 007229 OR-007233 OR 0072 55 OR-007243 OR-007258 OR 007260 OR-007272 OR-007275 OR 007246 OR 007302 95/08/03 OR-007213 95/08/24 OR 007270 95/08/23 OR-007266 00000000 54734300 54207393 00000000 OOOOOOOO 00000000 54734300 5446 1495 00000000 54461495 57237155 54734300 00000000 54791547 24738793 05352731 88510942 OOOOOOOO SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE PATNODE BROTHERS SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE WlliMER BROS INf WIDMER BROS INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC SULLIVAN'S UTII.ITY SERVICE VOLKENANT fc SOUS INC CITYVIEW n.PG h HTG HOME SERVICE IHRH'ATION MAS.TKR SPRIMKLI'.R 8,000.002,000.00 1,600.00 4.830.00 25,680.00 5.978.00 1,000.00 1.700.00 200.00 11,800.00 5, on.00 1,800.00 11,475.00 3.400.00 755.54 500.00 500.00 1.200.00 .00 170.62 142.51 3,200.00 1,000.00 500.00 .00 DOtlAI.DSON .00 DONALDSON • 00 .00 PERL .00 SOUTER . 00 ROBBINS . 00 ROBBINS . 00 LEVY .00 SCHUI.T'/.. 00 SCNULTC..00 EIDEH .00 BRYSON .00 ROSS ING . 00 .00 ROSS 1NG .00 COCCULl.OTTO .00 POAGE . 00 VENTURA .00 1.620,352.67* * % *% ** 7*1 ■. ?. 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 99 9999 WORK TYPE CODE Residence Addition Garage/Attached Garage/Detached Porch Deck Fence Gazebo Pool Re-side Re-roof Tennis Court Sign Dock Shed Demo—Principal Structure Dcmo-Accessory Structure Move Conuncrcial Institutional Storm Damage Repair 1-100 Cubic Yards 101 Cubic Yards or More Undefined 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 LOCAL USB CODES Undefined Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Weil Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monument Tree Removal s UI, SEP i; ^95, lUMERICAL LISTING 11:44 AM AUGUST 199SERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM »^ PAGE 1VALUATION)R-007106)R-007151)R-007198 )R-007199 >R-007200 )R-007201 )R-007202 )R-007203 )R-007204 )R-007205 )R-007206 )R-007207 )R-007208 )R-007209 M-001210 )R-007211 OR-007212 7R-007213 OR-007214 OR-00721S OR-007217 OR-00721B 95/00/17 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/02 N 95/00/01 N 95/08/01 N 95/08/01 N 95/08/01 N 95/00/01 N 95/00/02 N 95/00/02 N 95/00/02 M 95/08/02 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/03 N 95/00/04 N 95/00/07 N 95/00/23 N 95/00/16 N 400046002300 2820 450 2800 1003 3264 309 309 480 400 3050 3700 2875 4109 1590 2990 309 3605 1125 630 BAYSIDE RD CREEKWOOD TR WAYZATA BLVD DEER RUM TR WCX3DHILL RL) COUNTRYSIDE DR W COX FARM RD NORTH SHORE DR WESTLAKE ST WESTLAKE ST ORCHARD PK RD ORCHARD PK RD 6TH AVE N TOGO RD DEER RUN TR HIGHWOOD RD LONG LAKE BLVD SUSSEX RD WESTLAKE ST WATERTOWN RD WILLOW DR N DEBORAH DR 02 0000000005 17572926 19 18943276 01 35453797 11 17294420 01 24409030 06 14701364 11 14718979 01 00000000 01 54734300 29 29332521 29 29332521 01 15226163 n 14733397 01 54207393 29 35453797 17 00000000 01 05352731 01 00000000 29 10238046 06 00000000 29 14731765 OR-007219 95/08/01 N 105 BEDERWOOD DR 01 00000000 OR-007220 95/08/07 N 3460 NORTH SHORE DR 11 00000000 OR-007221 95/08/07 N 2 725 SHADYWOOD RD 02 29332036 OR-007222 95/08/08 N 3496 SHORELINE DR 11 00000000 OR-007223 95/08/08 N 2635 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24432921 OR-007224 95/08/08 N 8 75 WAYZATA BLVD 13 14709460 OR-007225 95/08/10 N 3225 CASCO CIR 02 00000000 OR-007226 95/08/08 N 4455 NORTH SHORE DR 02 36332561 OR-007227 95/08/08 N 2648 LYDIARD AVE 2S 34450585 OR-007229 95/08/09 N 3211 BAYSIDE RD 01 00000000 OR-007230 95/08/09 N 1535 MINNIE AVE 11 00000000 OR-007232 95/08/09 N 1 870 6TH AVE N 01 35453797 OR-007233 95/08/10 N 3211 BAYSIDE RD 01 54734300 OR-007234 95/00/10 N 1695 FOX ST 29 15300479 OR-007235 95/08/10 N 2425 NORTH SHORE DR 01 54461495 OR-007236 95/00/11 N 2507 KFI.LY AVE 24 22630236 OR-007237 95/00/11 N 1 3 01 EI.MWOOD AVE 01 35421166 OR-007239 95/00/11 N 1400 CHERRY PL 05 00000000 OR-007240 95/00/11 N 16 95 FOX ST 01 24740202 OR-007241 95/08/14 N 3508 IVY I'L 29 14710532 OR-007242 95/08/14 N 1790 SHADYWOOD RD 29 16823369 OR-007243 95/00/15 N 3409 EASTLAKE ST 01 OOOOOUOO OR-007244 95/00/15 N 4 102 HIGHWOOD RD 29 29337200 OR-007245 95/00/15 N 1420 BALPUR PARK RD 29 29337200 OR-007246 95/00/15 N 2060 6TH AVE N 24 54 7 9154 ; OR-007247 95/08/15 N 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 15590251 OR-007240 95/00/15 N 1 020 FOX ST 11 14495771 OR-007249 95/08/30 N 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR 02 14751160 OR-007250 95/08/16 N 2875 DEER RUM TR 09 15429000 OR-007251 95/08/16 N 1070 6TH AVE N 01 34972661 OR-007252 95/08/17 N 4520 WEST nvhuni rd 01 34461047 OR-007253 95/00/16 M 6 5 WILLOW DR N 24 H 709550 NEDEGAARD CONSTRUCTION CO BRAUN BUILT CORP M H SEIFERT CONST EL SHERIDAN ENTERPRISES AMERICAN PLUMBING HAGELE HOME CARE CO TRENDY ROOFING k SONS INC SULLIVAN'S UTllilTY SERVICE THOMPSON PI BG THOMPSON PLBG NOONAN CONSTRUCTION INC Pl.YMOUTH ROOFING PATNODE BROTHERS M H SEIFERT CONST HOME SERVICE IRRICJATION SELA ROOFING LUNDGREN BROS KEM(4lEl ING DOUGS PLUMBING SOUTHWEST METRO PI.BG SIGNS UNLIMITED FIRESIDE CORNER RON'S MECH INC M H SEIFERT CONST SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE DAHL STEVE ('ONST WIDMER BROS INC JOHNSON RICHARD A FLARE HTG k AC A-AARONS DANBERRY COMPANY DON LIND CONSTRUCTION CULLIGAN CULLIGAN VOLKKMANT k SONS INC ElDEN CONSTRUCTION INC SUBURBAN EXTEinORS INC TAYLOR KATHERINE DALPHIN POOL h SPA DJ'S HTG k AC ST BONI REFRIG k A/C DllTER INC HARRINGTON 110,000.00O'NEILL 50.000. 0010.000. 00 2,000.00 WILSON 10,000.00 EIDEN 200.00 WILSON 4,210.00 NORUM 1,000.00 DONALDSON .00 DONALDSON .00 ANDREWS 1,200.00 ANDREWS .00 KEZAR 232,000.00 FACKLER 640.00 .00 APPLEDAUM 1,000.00 ENGMAN .00 COC('UM.OTTO .00 PERL .00 MERIUETIl 32,000.00 ERSKINE 1,760.00 KARLEN 11,541.00 SOUTER . 00 NELSON 2,000.00 MEEK 500.00 ERAHM 2,100.00 EIDEN 11,800.00 .00 DOTZENROTH 62,000.00 ABRAIIAMSON 2,000.00 FREESE 1,700.00 ROBBINS .00 KOL'VriNEN 1,000.00 HERNANDEZ 4,500.00 ROBBINS .00 CUTHEART 1,850.00 LEVY .00 NADLER 500.00 JOHNSON 1,960.00 ZULK 7,000.00 CAR THCART 5,000.00 WILSON 20,000.00 URBAN 12,500.00sciun;rz .00 POON 170.62 ROTH 142.51 .00 1,300.00 KLIENKE 7,297.00 ia(;an 75.000.00 ROBBINS 16,000.00 HFRNADUS 5,000.00 I%AS'TMAN 3.000.00 r^RoriBERG 1,600.00 'a, SEP l, 1995, 11:4'! AM'JMERICAL LISTING AUt^ST 1995REMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NPR STREET PA'^B 2WORK ID NUMBER CaiPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONHAOLUNL)1.800.00BANGFRT425,000.00GUNSOLUS1,673.00DELANEY2,000.00SCHULTZ.00SMIEvTA3,200.00EIDEN.00ZWARF1,500.00FRRDEEN3,000.00RHYLICK8,000.00EIDEN11,475.00VENTURA. 00CURLEY7,450.00CUMMINGS2,500.00HENNINGSEN40,000.00rOAGR.00 HAGEN 3,500.00 DRYSC>N .00andi-:rsum 1,000.00BOZONIE600.00ROSSING. 00WHITE840.00O' NE1 r.3.400.00 4,000.00 12,000.00 2.250.00O' NEIL 2,075.00BASCH2,500.00ANDERSC'N 3,000.00 274,000.00EDWARDS1,975.00TIIIMMESII4,830.00 MURI'IIY 25,600.00 S(’ANI.ON 5,978.00 8,000.00WILDMAN500.00 DAYTON 755.54EASIMAN800.00IIEJT40.000.00PALM. 00ROSS IMG .00 R-007254 R-007255 R-007256 R-007257 R-007258 R-007259 R-007260 R-007262 U-007263 R-007264 R-007265 R-007266 R-007267 R-007268 R-007269 •R-007270 >R ''07271 )R-007272 )R-007273 )R-007274 )R-007275 )R-007276 'R-007277 )R-007278 )R-007279 >R-007280 'R-007281 )R-007284 'R-007289 )R-007290 )R-007292 )R-007293 )R-007294 ;R-007295 ')R-007296 )R-007297 ')R-007298 oR-007299 <JR- 007300 OR-007301 OR.007302 75C 95/08/16 N 95/08/16 N 95/08/17 N 95/08/17 N 95/08/18 N 95/08/18 N 95/08/21 N 95/08/21 N 95/08/21 N 95/08/23 N 95/08/22 N 95/08/23 N 95/08/25 N 95/08/24 N 95/08/25 N 95/08/24 N 95/08/24 N 95/08/25 H 95/08/25 N 95/08/25 N 95/08/28 N 95/08/28 N 95/08/29 N 95/08/29 tl 95/08/31 11 95/08/30 N 95/08/30 H 95/08/30 M 95/08/30 H 95/08/30 N 95/08/30 N 95/08/30 U 95/08/30 H 95/08/31 H 95/08/30 N 95/08/30 N 95/08/30 N 95/08/31 N 95/08/31 tl 95/08/31 H 95/08/31 N 45903500513645 3409 3085 2775 3970 1925 1045 2655 45 1291 3525 975 2905 3369 670 349 1755 130 180 4680 24 20 7 95 2635 4 6 00 3 3 00 4220 2 700 24 71 194 5 2265 2815 26 55 29 90 825 1 520 1 153 16 85 1 10 NORTH ARM DR W BAYSIDE RD WILLOW DR N LYRIC AVE EASTLAKB ST WATERTOWN RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W NORTH SHORE DR COUNTRY CLUB RD NORTH ARM DR COUNTRYSIDE DR W FERNDALE GREEN BRIAR ST IVY PL TONKAWA RD DEER PUH TR CRYSTAL BAY RD BIG ISLAND WESTLAKE ST EAGERNESS POINT RD CYGNET PL NORTH SHORE DR W CREEKWOOI) TR DUNWOODY AVE OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W CREEKWOOD TR NAVARRE I.A CHIPPEWA LA COUNTRYSIDE DR W CARMAN ST FAGERMESS pniNT RD NORTH SHORE DR CASCO POINT RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W SUSSEX RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WEST BRANCH RD ELMWOOD AVE CONCORDIA ST CYflNET ri. S 01 29445399011471839029139155140600000000015446149529247219770157237155110000000011000000002914721700012443292122000000000419208888090000000002144908660188510942 11 16238046 01 54731300 29 21738793 11 00000000 01 00000000 11 00000000 01 27551268 20 11725715 20 10299500 01 15590251 01 37575010 06 00000000 11 11727900 01 15590251 01 38212656 2i 30212656 24 39111011 24 31161299 01 31932477 99 24109030 01 29337200 15 00000000 02 17003262 16 00000000 29 217 30 793 THOEN PLUMPING INC KEN ROELOFS CONST INC M1NNESOTA EXTERIORSWIDMER BROS INC MADSEN PLBG 6 NTG CLOVER MILL COMPANY INCPARADISE CONSTRUCTION SOUTHWEST METRO PLBGWESTERN CONSTRUCTION CO.lUDD INTERIORS MASTER SPRINKLER SEI.A ROOFING SUl.LIVAH'S UTILITY SERVICE CITYVIEW PI,BG H IITG JERRY'S I'LPG fx IITG THE. CARPENTERS C(.)NST Co SOUTH RIDGE CONS I RUCTION ElDEN CONSIRUCIION INC DEPENDABLE IITG U AC PETTY PETER ElDEN CONSTRUCTION INC STANDARD HTG U AC CO STANDARD HTG f. AC CO CENTRAIRE INC COUNIRYSIDE HTG «, COOLIMC HEATING *c C(X)L1NG TWO AMERICAN PLUMBING CUI,L1GAN MURPHY BROS lU.DG *, RMDI.U' CITYVIEW PI,BG ». HTG ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLETTEDBPRMTISS-l 09/01/9SERMIT TYPEner Defined UBDIVISIOM ARIANCE UPKETCH PLAN ARIANCE/CUP ACATION *ib- total rand-total 2901 1 1 14* 14** AUGUST 199i***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ••***CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANCE - 0fl/01/9r> . 00/31/95PASS FFE500.on l ,550.00 0.00 200.00 300.00 550.00 3,100.00* 3,100.00** VALUATION000 0 0 0 0 000000 00 00 00 00* 0.00** PLAN REVIEW000 0 0 0 0 000000 00 00 00 00* 0.00 • « OTY163 0 1 0 11* 11* PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 00/01/94 - O0/31/Q4BASE FEE500.001,250.00400.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 2,350.00* 2,350.00** VALUATION00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00* PLAN REVIEW00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00**0.00** EPORT NBR. BFEERFT2-1 ATE OF RUN 09/01/95 . . . . . FROM 08/01/95 TO f'«/91/<»5 REPORT TOTAL ASE FEE 3,100.00 3.100.OP LAN REVIEW 0. on 0.00 HRCIIARGE 0 . no 0.00 1C. SEARCH FEE AC 0 . on 0 . on 0.00 0, no MVESTIGATION () 00 0.00 EPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ERMIT TOTAL 3,100.00 3,100.00 PAGE: 1 RROUESTER: CAROLE « \ P®irrs ISSUED/FEES collected 'YEAR-TO-DATE:bport NBR. BPRMTISS-1 »ATB OF RUN 09/01/95 **ttt rKRMiT ir*suEn reportCITY OF ORONO • • * i *PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE'ERMIT TYPE \uilding:GL family-new>UPLBX-NEW:f-add/remodel ;f-acc structure )BMO/PRINCIPAL :OM-ADD/REMODEL )BMO INST-ADD/REMODEL [NST-ACC STRUCT ?F-LAND ALT 'LAN REVIEW ONLY ^EMO-ACCESSORY \CC/GARAGES ^ub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE (;AS LINE INSnXT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED .*»ub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer fit Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD fit/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER fit WATER Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY .Sub- total Fire FIREWORKS QTY230 162 22 10 8 1 3 0 1 1 6 0 215* -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 08/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/91 - 00/31/91RASE FEE39,9530 30,347 3,710 620 2,582 30 331 0 72 0 200 1,331 07,170 . 10 . 00 .50 .25 . 00 . 75 .00 .25 . 00 . 00 . 00 . 00 .75 .60* VALP\T10N7.392.270.00 0.00 4.180.817.00 398.700.00 0.00 392.512.00 0.00 17,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 550,000.00 0.00 82,675.00 13,019,012.00* Pl.AN REVIEW QTY RASE FEE VAT UA'ITON PLAN REVIEW25,968.16 24 33,453.50 7,625,220 00 21,744.050.00 1 15.00 500.00 0.00 20,669.73 137 17,815.00 1,085,621.00 0,772 .46 2.357.06 17 1.730.50 lift,100.OO 1,044.23 0.00 0 460.00 0.00 0.00 216.61 5 177.00 T7,300.00 81.90 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.60 3 1,079.50 1 25,240.00 281 .13 0.00 1 207.00 20,000.00 134.55 16.80 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,423.18 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 051.99 11 1,721.00 105,601.00 1,261.00 51,692.13*211*57,029.50* 10.027,585.00*33,320.12* 45 3,802.19 290,029.00 0.00 5 3 4,007.05 365,942.84 0.0012630.00 10,485.00 0.00 7 265.08 14,661.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 3 151.25 10,200.00 0.00371,635.00 09,974.00 0.00 22 1,200.00 01.189.16 0.00270.00 3,275.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,150.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 3 5.00 2,000.00 0.003105.00 1,100.00 0.00 7 245.00 5,515.00 0.000200.00 7,065.00 0.00 5 202.50 8,535.00 0.005175.00 5,150.00 0 00 11 393.75 11,350.00 0.00 1 217.50 19,000.00 0.00 2 499.56 39,925.00 0.00 113*6,911.69*157,170.00*0.00*112*7,911.19*513, 760.00*0.00* 01 6,153.72 112,195.62 0.00 03 6,007.92 107,837.09 0.00 1 102.00 1,200.00 0.00 10 1,031.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 o.oc 91*6,710.72*115,395.62*0.00*93*7,841 .92*407,837.09*0.00* 6 210.00 0.00 0.00 10 630.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 215.00 0.00 0.00 27 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 22 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 7 5,950.00 0.00 0.00 17 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 1 200.00 0.00 0.00 41*9,080.00*0.00*0.00*70*15,505.00*0.00*0.00* 2 70.00 1,500.on 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 400.00 0.00 1 39.00 1,200.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 6*200.00*1,900.00*0.00*5*169.00*1,200.00*0.00* 3 150.00 0.00 0 . OO 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 (PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLEJCTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMTlSS-1 DATE OF RUN 09/01/95 • PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAuEs 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANCH - 01/01/95 - OS/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - Qfl/31/94PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VAl,MATION P^A^: REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWUser DefinedSUBDIVISION 11 5,21S.00 0.00 0.00 11 8,875.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 42 8,450,00 0.00 0.00 38 7,525.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 13 2,825.00 0.00 0.00 12 1,825 00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 8 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 2 400.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 6 2,175.00 0.00 0.00 5 800.00 0 00 0.00 VACATION 1 550.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 APPEAL A 100.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 82*20,915.00*0.00*0.00*68*19,425.00*0.00*0.00* Crand-total 82**20,915.00**0.00**0.00**68**19,425.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 09/01/95 •*•** PERMIT FEE CITY OF FROM 01/01/95 PKl’OKT ♦•••• ORONO TO 08/31/05 PAGE: REQUESTER: CAROLE BUILDING ME^'UIANICAL PLUMBING SFWFK r, WATKR USER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE «7, 17<^ f 0 6,944.69 6,740.72 9, nnrt.00 1,060.00 200.00 150.00 PLAN REVIEW 51,f .13 0.00 0.00 o.oc 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE f ,:'«C.ll 231.00 215.15 18.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 2.550.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 3,379.75 0.00 0.00 100.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n.oo 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN .60 45.85 3.00 PERMIT TOTAL 151,04C. . 59 7,274 29 7,001.12 9,198.50 1,101.00 200.00 150.00 P- tj -Z. ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMtISS-1 )ATB OF RUN 09/01/95 PERMIT ISSUED RETORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 08/U/95‘ERMIT TYPB lub-total QTY3*BASE FEE l-.O .00^VALUATION0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00*QTY0*leer Defined .AND ALTERATION IRBB REMOVAL DETAINING WALLS LAWN SPRINKLER :ub-total 1241G23*630.00120.00 100.00 210.001,060.00*000000000 00 00 00 00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*7421023* ;rand-total S25 « •in,354.01»‘ 13,«97,2B5.f.2**,f<92. n* •514** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 HATE OF RUN 09/01/95 • •••• phMirr IEF RF.roRr CITY OK OR(’MO FROM 01/01/95 TO ('«/11/95 « * • * * U.SEP REF'ORT TOTAL BASE FEE 2 n, } 15.00 20,915.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0. on DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 20,915.00 20,915.00 PAGEI 2REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 > 08/31/94BASE FEB 0.00*VALUATION0.00*PLAN REVIEW 0.00*400.00120.00 89.00350.00 959.00*0.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.004,500.00*00000 0000000000* R9.418.61** 10,984,890.89 • •33,320.12** PAGE: I REQUESTER: CAROLE 1995 RECAP Of CORTRACI CITIESJanuary February March_ _April June July August Septernber October November Deccii<)er YTD Totaliing Par Plan Rtvlai Ir»pectiona Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Revfeys No. Inspectlom Minnetonka Beach Plan Review Inspections Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 0.00225.00 25.00 250.00 0 15 0.00 135.00 25.00 160.00 0 9 5.416.77 210.0025.005.651.77 8 14 1.075.43 45.00 25.00 1.145.43 1 3 ,016.97 0.00 2.027.67 4,543.85 227.18 1,898.0075.00 180.00 90.00 195.00 255.00 495.0025.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 ,116.97 205.00 2,142.67 4,763.85 507.18 2,418.00 6 0 3 2 2 6 5 12 6 13 17 33 143.35 32.20 816.56 210.92 4,525.71 885.30 105.00 45.00 75.00 135.00 120.00 120.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 273.35 102.20 916.56 370.92 4,670.71 1,030.30 3 1 4 2 2 2 7 3 5 9 8 8 S.390.si 307.20 3,059.23 5,134.77 i,l77.49 3,448.30 16.130.44 1.555.00200.0018.055.44 27 115 7.689.47 780.00 200.00 8.669.47 15 _ _ _ _52 26.724.9i Siiffiltiafl ince *.o J > *.-3 SEP '11995 Ronald Moorse, Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bav, MN 55323-0066^ # Dear Mr. Moorse: As you know. Suburban Alliance (formerly West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board) has a history of involvement in the issues of affordable housing, c?conomic development, and bringing needed services to our area. It was with great interest that we watched recent developments of interest to our communities; specifically, passage into law of the Livable Communities Act and the adoption of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint Suburban Alliance is committed to assisting those West Hennepin municipalities who are interested in participating in the Livable Communities Act We are currently talking to several foundations about underwriting our efforts to assist communities, and so our involvement and assistance would be available to you at no cost. The type and amount of assistance we can provide will depend on the needs of the individual municipality, and include: community education and involvement; needs assessment organizing networks of social serxice providers to develop needed services; initiating economic development collaboratives; working with the faith community on family-to- family mentoring projects; technical/planning assistance relating to housing; and other services as needed. We are excited bv the opportunities presented by these recent public policy dev^elopments, and would like to talk to you about the possibility of your city's involvement in the Livable Communities .-\cL Bruce Larson, our .-\ssistant Director, will call you next week to discuss the potential for our working together. Sincerely, lL,-C —h- Michele SL Martin Executive Director West Hennepin Human Services Ptonning Board 9 Seveiiiii Avenue South • Hopkins, MN 55343 • (6)2)930-3356 • Fox (6)2)930-3540 4 f September 13, 1995 City Of Orono Municipal Offices P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota Dear Council Members: 55323-0066 As some of you know, I have supported the municipal sewer concept for the adjacent North Long Lake neighborhood. At the information meeting on July 12, 1995, I was told that due to the unfeasibility of more than one lift station, ray property would be required to employ a grinder/force main. According to septic system designers, engineers, contractors, and service companies, this type of set-up is less deslreable and in fact far inferior to my present system. I now must request to "Opt Out" of participation in the proposed municipal sewer system for the following reasons: 1. Mv present system (New "Mound" type) is in full compliance with all State of Minnesota regulations, and Orono City ordinances. 2. My system has been designed and engineered to be maintained indefinitely. 3. Proposed design using grinder pump/force main would be inferior to existing system. 4. 3/4 of ray property is located in the excluded area - (See attached map). 5^ Property does not front or abut any city street or right of way. 6. Property has no lake frontage and is located at least 400 feet from lakeshore. Thank vou for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, Keith R. VandenBranden ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 21, 1995 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date \\ith the following members present: Chair Stephen Peterson, Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist. Jar.’ce Berg, and Elizabeth Hawn Candace Rowlette was absent The following represented ti e City Staff; Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planmng and Zoning Administrator Michael Gafffon, and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan and Council Members Goetten and Kelley were present Chair Peterson called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING (^1)#2051 MICHAEL HILBELINk, 2760 WATERTOWN ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT-7:01-7:13 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr. Hilbelink was present. Mabusth explained that the application is for a 4-lot residential plat of the former Rosch homestead at the northeast quadrant of Watertown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road. The property contains a type 1 wetland .All lots meet the 2-acre dry contiguous and width requirements The on-site septic has been found to be conforming All are proposed as mound systems located on slopes less than The Planning Commission conceptually appro\ed access tor three lots from a private road with a cul-de-sac Lot 4 s access will be from an existing curb cut offWatertown Road A road could be platted along the east lot line with each of the 4 lots meeting area and width standards. The access plan was chosen in order to save trees, reduce the grading impact on elevations, and minimize impact on existing development to east If a road was construaed at east lot line with four lots in the Peterman addition and three in current development would be through lots Conditional use permits would be required for all accessory structures The development must provide retention areas before runoff can enter the type 1 wetland A retention pond is within lots 3 and 4 and drainage flows between the shared line of lots 2 and 3. Mabusth included the draft of the Park Commission minutes regarding the Hilbelink propeny for a decision on park dedication fee or land for park use. The Park Commission recommended to the Council to ask tor cash in lieu of land. They asked that the land in the 8 ’ trail be excluded from the 8°o and the fee adjusted The trail along Old Cry stal Bay Road on the west side is being installed by the City. There were no public comments. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (^*1 - i!^2051 Michael lElbelmk - Continued) It was noted that additional drainage easements will be taken along the shared lot lines. No drainage easement will be taken over type 1 wetland. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2051 with the conditions as stated under the Staff recommendations Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#2) #2052 DOUG SAMS, 1185 LOMA LLNDA AVENUE - VACATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT/AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- 7:55-8:14 PJVL The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mabusth reported that the property ’ is on Loma Linda Avenue. A surv’ey of 10/93 was approved with the building permit Mabusth said the property receives drainage fiom the north and west and eventu^y drains through a ditch under Loma Linda, and continues to the lake. Mabusth said she has fielded a call from a neighbor and distributed a letter from Mrs Moe, who is concerned with the filling on the Sams property and the impact from that filling on drainage. It is Moe's concern that the fill will have a negative impact on her property. Mabusth relayed the history of the drainage for the property. In the early I980's. the Moe ’s were inundated with water and asked to funnel the water with tile and install rip rap. A 27" culvert was approved A tile on the Udell's property conveys the drainage from Sams and one other property to the tile on the Moe property and then on to the lake The Engineer was asked for his recommendation, which was faxed to Staff, and Peterson read into the minutes. Engineer Gustafson did not recall the exact concerns of the Moe's, but said it was his opinion that the fill should not have anv necative impact on the Moe ’s. The existing channel and culvert should be adequate and little retention would be needed. If a problem exists on drainage downstream, Gustafson said a restrictor could be installed on the Sams culvert It was suggested to ask Sams to mitigate any fill placed below the 958’ elevation. Applicant Sams asked for approval to relocate the drainage easement and would rededicate a public easement. It was Sams' goal to create a level yard with the 600-700 cubic yards of fill. Sams said the road elevation is higher and did not feel the fill affected the drainage Mabusth said the Engineer asked for grading of a 3:1 slope, vacation of the original easement, and dedication of a new easement. Gustafson asked for retention or restriction before the drainage goes to the culvert. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 {fiZ - #2052 Doug Sains Continued) Peterson and Liixiquist questioned what would happen if a drainage problem did occur from the fill. Peterson also asked how the fill was done without a permit. Sams said when he moved in 1-1/2 years ago, he put his name on a list for clean fill. He followed instructions of his comractor and landscaped and sodded in August of 1994 He was notified this spring of the availability of the fill, and as a new homeowner, did not realize he was violating a rule He was informed of the violation afrer the fill was delivered. Sams said he thought this was a continuation of the original construction. He added he was aware of the culvert. Smith asked what the lot looked like prior to the fill being added. Sams said he bought the 3-acre lot in 1991. The last owner had cut alot of the dirt out and brought to another lot. Sams had been informed that the lot was partially excavated. Schroeder asked why the applicant, after being advised to stop with the fill, added more fill on top of the original load Sams said the fill was available, and he added it knowing he was in violation. A letter received from Lyle Oman to the applicant informing him of the original violation was noted. Peterson said the Planning Commission would have to rely on the City Engineer to resolve the drainage issue. Schroeder said if the fill presented a drainage problem for the Moe's, the fill would have to be removed. Sams said he would be prepared to take the fill out if it was found to present a drainage problem for the Moe's. Mabusth said Gustafson advised that he did not believe filling on the Sams' property would have created retention or flooding problems on the Moe property. There were no public comments. Smith asked that Gustafson discuss the drainage problems with the Moe's. Peterson emphasized to Sams that no more fill could be added. Schroeder said a penalty should be assessed to the applicam. Sams said the amount of fill on his propertv’ now is all that he requires. He said he would mitigate the flow through the culvert and assist the Moe’s, if necessary. Schroeder said if a problem is found to exist, it was created by the applicant. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#2 - #2052 D<Kig Sams - Continued) Lindquist said the applicant should submit an amended grading plan. The Planning Commission should also receive feedback from the Engineer on the grading and the situation with the neighbors. Mabusth said another neighbor has called about drainage problems too. It was decided that too much information was missing at this time. It was noted that eroaon control efforts have been made with silt fencing. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #2052 to allow the applicant to hire a consuhant for a detailed grading plan and for meeting with the Engineer on the drainage situation. Ayes 6, Nays 0. ACTION ITEMS (#3) #2036 ROBERT J. GOUNTANIS, 1098 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCES - REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION - 7:13-7:55 P.M. Mr. Gountanis was presem and had asked the application be referred back to the Planning Commission for ftirther -'onsideration There was a question regarding the original plan and it's approval regarding a second story elevation above the garage, which was not seen or discussed. The applicant provided the floor plan, which includes two bedrooms with closets and two 'uathrooms with a hallway and door into a large room planned to be used as a game room. This second story will be accessed from a stairway. Peterson remarked that the approval was for the residence to be within the same footprint with no further e.xpansion. The lot is very small, which would create problems with any expansion. Lindquist and Smith agreed that a second story to the garage would be too massive for the property Gountanis responded that approval had been recommended for case #3 involving new construction instead of repair within the same footprint and a ma.\imum lot coverage of 1500 s f The house struaure is 2-story, and the 22‘x22' garage is an addition Gountanis said the setback was defined by the horizontal and not by height. He had thought a 2- story garage was approved and noted no condition made on the height of the structure. The statistics of the lot and variances were restated, and the three case options were reviewed for clarification and refreshment. It was noted that the elevations did show a 2- story garage but approval did not include the same The lack of detail in the floor plans was also brought to the attention of the applicant. \ i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#3 - #2036 Robert Gountanis - Continued) Mabusth reported that it had been stated at the prior Planning Commission meeting that .ne Commission was an advisory body only and made recommendations to the Council, who is the determining body for all applications. The applicant w as w arned of this, and applicant advised he would go forward with the purchase based on the Planning Commission recommendation The Planning Commission did not allow excess of structural coverage and said they were dealing with intensification of the structure on a sub-standard lot The applicant referred to the Planning Commission action notice, which relayed an attached 22x22' garage was recommended with a minimum setback of 3' and adjacent to the right side It also noted the 1 500 s.f lot coverage maximum. Gountanis said it did not mention not allowing a 2-story garage. Lindquist said the approval w as for a 2-story house but the Planning Commission was unaware of a 2-stoiy garage Smith said the location of the door was determined due to the need for minimal impact on the public right of w ay Gountanis said the elevation plan was presented showing the 2-story garage, which was verified by Mabusth Peterson who was not in attendance at that panicular meeting, noted that the minutes of the July 17 meeting made no refer c , e to a second story for the garage nor were any detailed floor plans presented The applicant responded that he could not provide detailed floor plans without knowing what the were The plans call for the same foot print, which is 980 s.f for the residence plus the garage area, for a total of 1492 s f The structural coverage amount deals only with the foot print: itself, not the square footage of the interior. It would not include the second story of the house or of a garage The ordinance relating to a no massing effect was mentioned It was also noted that the survey was current Hawn said she was not present at the meeting when the recommendation was made. However from the discussion tonight, if a scn:ond story to the garage was discussed, it would be denied. Hawn said the Planning Commission’s duty is to provide the best recommendation to the Council along with the best advice. At this time, a 2-story garage on that lot has been determmed to be too much The best recommendation and advice gained from this meeting then would be to deny the second story to the garage. There were no public comments. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#3 - #2036 Robert Gountanis - Continued) Lindquist said be would not approve the 2-story garage. Peterson said the garage was only shown as a 2-story on the elevation drawing. Schroeder said considerable progress has been planned for the property with the house being moved back out of the 0-75' setback area and believed this was enough to warrant approval for the 2-story garage. Gountanis said the reason case #3 was chosen was to improve all the setbacks. He said he felt he had made concessions. It was key to Gountanis to maintain the basic shape and gain as much house on the foot print as possible Gountanis emphasized that he tried to accomodate the recommendations of the Planning Commission and stay within the guidelines. Peterson said he agreed with that summation. He noted that alternatives were limited, and the issue of the 2-story garage w as a misunderstanding and an oversight. Peterson said he would be inclined to vote for approval Mabusth said the oversight was the reason the application was brought b-*ck before the Commission. The oversight was also on the applicant's part for not bringing to the attention of the Commission the desire for the garage to be two stories Gountanis said he did not know it would be a concern. It was further noted that cases 1 and 2 did not present the garage as two stories, only one Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to deny the plan for a 2-story garage. Ayes 4, Hawn, Smith, Berg, Lindquist; Nays, 2, Schroeder, Peterson. Motion for denial approved. The applicant asked w hat was the definition of a one-story garage .Mabusth said there was not one but it must be within the setbacks. Gountanis asked if he could follow the roof line of the house Berg suggested following the same pitch, but lowering it one story, and demonstrated what she meant on the overhead Mabusth said the design plan should be reviewed Ann Stevens voiced her frustration to the Planning Commission regarding the oversight, the lost month of construction time, the costs involved in redesigning by the architect; adding, she wanted the Council to review the plan She also said she was confused that it was noted the floor plans were not detailed, when she felt Mabusth had said the plans were the best Mabusth clarified that she had said the plans were adequate for the review and addressed ail peninent issues MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#4) #2039 WALLY AND SHARON CARSON. 3010 SOMERSET LANE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:07-9:17 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. & Mrs. Carson were present, along with their contractor, Mark Gronberg. The application is for a decorative pond within a type 1 wetland. It is presently under review with the Corp of Engineers, who is reviewing the project with other agencies and checking for effect on the wetlands The property is a 3-acre parcel wiih 1 acre ot type I vvetiands. The residents within the subdivision are asking for assurance that the pond would not affect the'*" properties Gronberg said the 1650+ cubic yards of fill will be used for back filling. The Watershed District was said to believe there would be no negative impact from the pond construction. Peterson asked for the reason for building a pond. Gronberg said there was a two-fold purpose. One reason is for beautification of the site to create a higher type 3 wetland, and the other is to use the fill for the house pad Peterson said the question is always what is a pond. The Planning Commission does not want a round bowl with gravel and mowed grass up to its edges. The Commission would like to see more type 3 wetland ponds, which would include no mowing wnthin 10' of the pond to encourage native growth. Mabusth said this was noted in the Engineer's recommendation Gronberg said this was shown in the configuration for the pond. Mabusth asked the applicant w hat the maximum depth would be of the pond. It would be 6-8 ’ deep Smith asked Stall' to ensure the standards are consistent with the pond development plans made for another project on Orono Orchard Road. Schroeder moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 6' deep pond with the moving of 1650 cubic yards of fill to create a type 3 wetland with the standards developed with the pond on the Spencer property on Orono Orchards. No mowing would be allowed within 10' of the pond Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#5) #2042 THOMAS FRANK. 1233 BRIAR STREET • VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:14-8:23 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. & Mrs Frank were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONLMlSSlON MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21. 1995 (#5 - #2042 Thomas Frank - Continued) Malnisth reported that the property is a lakeshore lot on a natural environment OHW, French Creek Lake There are no improvements within the 75' setback. A structural on a OHW requires a 150* setback. There arc some hardcover improvements at 75’ The proposal requiics an average lakeshore setback variance The house is within the 50' street setback. The proposed deck requires a setback variance The deck exists at 137* and is proposed at 131'. The proposal requires a 3’ average lakeshore setback variance. Peterson read into the minutes a letter from the DNR, which recommends the proposal, with two conditions. They ask for screening and relocation of the deck to another area of the home. Peterson did not see where the deck could be repositioned Mabusth said the setting is very natural and no visual screening is needed. It was detemiined that the DNR had not been on site in reviewing the proposal. Schroeder asked if the deck could be smaller. Mrs. Frank said, although it could be a little smaller, !**<• steps for the deck allow access to the driveway, and the deck only e^nends 6' from t*. house Mr Frank said the hardcover is within the 25% allowable at 19 14% and ask for f .oval as proposed Mah.tf *»r the Commissioners if they would give approval for structure within the street sc * Lindquist and Peterson saw no problem Mabusth will contact M r Richie' of the D’ <. There were no public comments. Schroeder moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2042 to extend the deck based on the lack of another area in which to relocate the deck and the proposal having no impact on its surroundings Ayes 6, Nays 0 (#6) #2044 GEORGE OLSON, 2775 SHAD^ WOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING The Cenificate of Mailing and .Atfrdavit of Publication were noted. Peterson moved. Smith seconded, to table the application until the September 18 meeting at the request of the applicant. Ayes 6, Nays 0 (#7) #2045 JOHN STF.LVMETZ, 1155 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:23-8:40 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. Mr Steinmeiz was present 1 H MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMKflSSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21.1995 (#7 - #2045 John Steinmctz - Continued) Mabusth reported that this property is located at the intersection of Brown Road South and iliow Drive with the house on higher elevations from adjacent roadways. The origiiud driveway has been relocated to Willow Drive along with a new detached garage. New landscaping has also been done The proposal requires structural coverage and street setback variances for a covered deck to be installed around the entire residence along with a single story addition at the NE comer of existing residence. Dave Zetterstrom of the Hennepin DOT said there w as no minimum setback requirement from a county road. The deck is proposed at 8 ’ width with a 2' overhang extending over the deck and would be located approximately 44' from Willow Drive and 0’ from Brown Road South The structural coverage variance is magnified by the new addition. It exists at 93% and is proposed at 16.3®i for 260 s.f or 1.3% excess. No hardcover problems exist Commissioners discussed ways to eliminate the structural coverage problem The code allows 15% of area for properties under 2 acres. Peterson suggested the deck and overhang be used on three sides of the home Hawn suggested eliminating the deck from the Brown .. side of the residence. The applicant emphasized a four-sided deck and overhang for consistency and for an aesthetically pleasing look It was suggested to recalculate the deck at 6' in order to maintain the consistenc>- in look, to move back away from the county road, and stay within the structural coverage guidelines. Schroeder noted the considerable hardships. The higher elevation at the road side was noted Lindquist said downsizing 1-1/2’ all around would meet the requirements There were no public comments Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2045 with the condition the structure is within the maximum of 15% lot coverage to allow the applicant flexibility, and to be at least 2‘ oflf the setback line to the county road and the Brown Road right of way. Mabusth asked the applicant to have the surve>or locate the ditch area and traveled road within the right of way Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#8) #2046 LAKEVIEW GOLF. 405 NORTH AR.M DRIVT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARUNCE - PUBUC HEARING - 8:40-8:52 P.M. The Cenificatc of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The applicant and the builder were present. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#8 - #2046 Lakeview Golf - Continued) Gafifron repeated that the application was to constnict a storage building and to rebuild the 15th and 16th fiirways on the SE comer of the golf course It was noted that the 1974 survey did not include an existing storage building or applicant’s house, which is a separate homestead property. It also does not show the RLS correctly. Gaffron asked for an ted survey to be completed as part of the approval. The storage building is proposed at 45x 100* in size to be located in the northwest quadrant, 640' from North Arm Road, and visible from both North Arm Drive West and CoRd 19. The building would exceed the 3,000 s.f of building limit at 4,500 s.f The code allows for an accessory structure on a 9 acre parcel of 3000 s.f with 6000 s f maximum for total of all accessory structure footprint areas Gaffron noted that an amendment has been drafred to allow 200 s f of accessory' structure for each additional acre. 17 acres would be required to support the accessory structure under that amendment A concern with the proposal is the open view of the accessory structure. It is anticipated that none of the existing mature trees would be removed to accomodate this building. The building will be an average of 16.5' in height of a pole bam type. Screening is recommended along with color of materials to be chosen to blend into the scenery. The relocation of fairways #15 and #16 will require movement of 18(X) cubic yards of fill within the site. As part of a sketch plan, a 2 acre lot subdivision is also proposed. The applicant said the proposal would require carving out of a hill in order to create a view of the green on the second shot Gaffron said the City Engineer had no problem with the grading. If it is approv ed. Staff asks that the applicant adher to Best Management Practices in regards to erosion and runoff control. Revegetation would occur as soon as possible in order to play the holes the next year. Peterson asked what color was proposed for the storage building The applicant said a green or earth tone would be attractice Smith asked why such a large structure was required. The applicant said the amount of equipment, such as mowers, back hoe, loaders, mulchers, has increased over the years and need to be stored The majority jf the equipment is now outside. It was noted there would be no access to this structure Smith asked if the smaller storage building could be remov ed. She was informed that the other building houses the golf carts. Smith also inquired about screening, which is also proposed. Peterson said a CUP to move the fill around should not create any problems as it is not on the roadway and also saw no problem with the size of the structure. Peterson suggested the applicant work with Staff on screening. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#8 - #2046 Lakeview Golf - Continued) Sc)ffo«ler moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval for a 4500 s.f. storage building, work with Staff on a screening plan, to relexate the 15th and 16th fairways with th, movement of fill on the property, and to update the survey at the end of the building process. Tom Major asked how the site was selected. The applicant said the site was in the middle of 3 holes, and the only good spot where there are lots of trees to block it out. Ayes 6 Nays 0. (#9) #2048 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/V’ARIANCE - PUBUC HEARLNG - 8:52-9:07 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. Scott Crawford of Kraus Anderson Construction represented the applicant. Mabusth noted that approval has been granted for a green house, a guest house, and a 2- level caretaker residence within this property The current application is for the conditional use permit for a studio apartmem within the upper level of the oversized accessory structure and will act as an independent structure with its own kitchen and entry If sewer comes to the properT> , all accessory structures will be considered. The sewer is likely to occur and hopefully scheduled for 1996 awaiting completion of comprehensive plan amendment and Met Council approval The property’s scheduled date of 1995 to update the septic will be to be refigured if sewering is not done. CrawTord said the construction company would like to be off-site and completed before 1996 Peterson said he saw no problem with the studio apanment and saw the issue needing resolve as sewer. Peterson is concerned with the lapse of time and the need for protection. que ‘‘tioning whether the septic is able to handle all of the cun ent usage. Schroeder asked how mariv people live on the premises. Mabusth said there would be a total of six bedrooms within structures Although components of the kitchen, etc., were in place according to Crawford, Mabusth said the studio apartment is a separate residential unit. Mabusth turther added that no floor plans were ever provided to Orono Staff of this building MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#9 - #2048 James &. Joann Jundt - Continued) Mabusth said the septic is non-conforming, and h is being questioned \^hat affect the apartmoit would have on the septic. Mabusth said it is a good idea to ask for septic inspections Peterson agreed that the goal is not to allow the septic to fail Crawtord noted that this property was considered a hot spot for sewering at one time, and the applicant has been dealing with this issue throughout all the applications. Schroeder added that the City cannot allow more people to reside on the property than the septic can handle. He is in favor of inspections: and if the system fails, Schroder said that would affect the conditional use permit The property has two separate septic units, one for the main residence and one for the accessory’ structures. The septic units do not meet the separation requirements. Peterson commented that normal inspections occur every two years. This property, according to Peterson, should be inspected more often. Schroder moved, Lindquist seconded, for approval of a studio within the oversized accessory structure, subject to conditions of the CUP with inspections of existing relevant sy stem every two months to show its capability in handling the increased usage. A charge will be incurred by the applicant for extra inspection time. Gaflfron remarked that the earliest date for sewering of the property would be the end of ^ 19% ‘ Is Staffs sense that the septic is not running out onto the ground, but noted the 3* sepa, h% .1 is not met. It is pos.sible that the system may not be able to handle the usable was 'ring this period of time If this is found to be true, the septic would need to be pi. . ed ' on a regular basis. There were no public comments. .Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mabusth commented on an issue with tree removal in the 0-75’ zone for waterproofing of a tunnel that was not approved by Staff All of the eanh around the tunnel was moved during the waterproofing process Staff will ask for replanting of these trees Crawford commented that the elms were deteriorated, and tree roots were extending into the tunnel. Part of the tunnel encroaches the 0-75' setback An amended application will be coming before the Planning Commission on this issue and is not part of this application (#10) #2049 FRED GUTFORMSON AND CHIC DW IGHT, 1220 TONKAVVA ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:25-9:48 P.M. The Certificate of .Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. 12 rs:MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#10 - #2049 Fred Guttormson & Chic Dwight - Continued) The applicants were present. GaSron reported the application was to replace an existing deck, along with the construction of a screened porch uiKler the deck A walkout area would also be excavated from what is now a split entry area The existing deck is in poor condition Replacement would be done of the total foundation as footings have been found to depths less than the frost line. This would all occur within the 0-75' setback area and require hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances The residence is 42' from the lake, and the 8x24' deck would be located 34' from the lake. Drainage on the property comes from the mature trees toward the proposed screen porch area It is questioned whether this could be flattened out, retaining walls about 1' in height be construaed, or ground cover established to aid the drainage. A letter from the DNR was read into the minutes recommending denial of the application based on the existing house being within 75' of the lake and proposed porch and deck increasing the nonconformity of the house The porch and deck would also be within the 37.5' shore impact zone Galfron noted that the hardcover would be at 8 48^^o, resulting in a minimum increase in the hardco\'er from e.xisting It would, however, lend more permanency Two buildings have been removed as well as an 8* gravel driveway located in the 0-75' zone, which has not been revegetated. New gravel has been placed for the loop driveway. The applicant said the property was overgrown and buildings were found to be deteriorated. There is a tank on the property but the reason for it is unknown During clean up. the driveway to the lake was discovered. Two 20-yard dumpsters were used to remove debris from the yard and house. An outhouse sized building still exists by the lakeside Peterson said the application has several issues He felt the filling on the top dressing down to the lake should meet approval. The accessory structure to the south should be removed It was felt the retaining walls would create problems and not solve any. The applicant said she has seeded three times and erosion has washed it out. It is so shaded that sod will not grow and thought a wall would help It is the applicant's desire to keep the property natural Peterson felt the sliding doors would meet his approval but found the deck and screened porch were issues needing discussion. f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#10 - #2049 Fred Guttormson & Chic Dv»ight - Continued) Lindi)uist a^ed why the deck and porch would be be>'ond the house. The applicant said there was surface hardcover there already Lindquist said the desire of the Planning Commission is to remove as much hardcover in the 0-75' zone as possible. It was noted that there is a 1x6' patio extention leading from the patio doors Lindquist said the deck could be replaced but the extension removed. The deck should not extend beyond the house. Gaffron asked the Commission if approval were given for the walkout, would this be setting a precedent by allowing a change to the grade. The applicant said her purpose was to gain light into the lower level ot the home and modernize it. The applicant said it appears the grade was put in when the home was built and not originally there Peterson said he saw a problem with the bench by the dock and asked applicant if they would be willing to eliminate the accessory structure to gain the deck The applicant said about 1000 s f of hardcover has been remov ed and felt they were being sensitive to that issue The applicant said the property was purchased in part because ot the deck structure by the lake Peter.son said it would not be allowed today. The applicant said she would be willing to remove the shed by the lake. Lindquist asked if the deck could be 8' instead of 8'6" Schroeder said the strurtural coverage should not exceed the amount on the property as it e.xists now He suggested the driveway extension and outhouse-slze shed be removed as mediation for the deck Any additional hardcover in the loop driveway that is unnecessary was also asked to be removed The applicant said this was required to turnaround noting the inability to park on Tonkawa Berg said she used the loop area in wiiich to turn around Peterson said the applicant should be concerned with the problems being created by beavers gnawing on the trees Major erosion problems could occur in the future due to the loss of these trees. Peterson asked if the issue is altering the lakeshore if the grading is changed. Gaffron said it would be a conditional use but Staff saw no need for this to be done and would not recommend approval for this or boulder walls Smith asked what could be done to maintain the shoreline. Gaffron said the boulder wall would help erosion from coming to the house and np-rap could be done to prevent shore erosion. A Watershed District pennit could be obtained to rip rap MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#10 - #2049 Fred Guttormson & Chic Duight - Continued) There were no public comments. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve replacement ot the deck and screened porch in the existing footprint, not to exceed the footprint Approval was recommended for the grade cut to allow a window or walkout door as proposed on the southeast side. No boulder walls would be allowed. Removal ot the concrete slab on the east side, removal of the existing accessory structure to the south, removal of the old access boat ramp and resodding of same, and removal of the dock at the shoreline to include the bench-deck area were recommended. Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#11) #2050 WILLLAM TOLLS. 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9;4*-10:l2 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted The applicant was present. Gaffron reponed the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to construct a pool on the lake side of the property, which was purchased by the applicant in July of 1995. The pool would create a 15' average lakeshore encroachment but would have no visual impact A net decrease in the hardcover would result in the 75-250* zone from 33 l*l'oto 32.6%. GatVron compared the application to a 1988 variance approval, the hardcover square footage of which was allow ed at that time, today, is now exceeded. There continues to be no hardcover in the 0-75’ zone The 75-250' zone was approved in 1988 for 29.5%, but exists at 33 l®/o, and is proposed at 32 6%. The 250-500' zone was approved in 1988 for 24 1%. exists in 1995 at 20 4“'o and proposes no change. The two surveys from 1988 and 1995 each use a slightly diflerent base lot area for each zone What GatVron thinks happened is the driveway ponion was eliminated but rock beds that are in place were not looked at and the overhangs were listed separately. The 1988 circular driveway has been changed with not as much loop and the garage addition built The applicant will take out the rock and plastic to be replaced with hard surface. The 1390 s f of land in base area calculation change and 400 s.f of concrete patio would be in exchange for the pool When the pool is built, there would be no hardcover within 115’ of the lake In looking at the hardcover as a percentage of the entire lot, there was 21.7®i» before, and as approved, in 1988. now existing at 22.1%, and proposed at 21.8*10. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#11 - #2050 William Toles - Continued) The applicant said the property has huge spaces of green and assumed there was enough space to warrant a pool He is willing to make any changes necessary without destroying the house to accomplish the pool. The applicant said the deck is not matching and is in stages of deterioration He would like to make the deck congruent with the pool It is within his plan to adjust the decking amount. The deck is needed to gain access to the house which is elevated but not necessary to sit on Peterson said while the average lakeshore setback is generally a most sensitive issue, it is not an issue here Because the pool is below grade, there is no visual impact The hardcover itself is the issue of concern. Again, trading plastic for a swimming pool, is an issue. Mark Gronberg said the shape of the lot was unique The property is large but a big portion is taken out of the 75-250' zone. He reitcreated that all hardcover is back from the lake beyond 115' creating a good bulTer. Schroeder asked the applicant what removals he had in mind for the deck. Toles said he would like to shorten the deck where the massive deck areas are located. He was told he would not need approval to do this A question not dealt with was whether the 4' overhang with an area below it was considered hardcover .Mthough there is a net decrease in the hardcover, it is trading structure for non-structure Peterson noted there are no accessory structures but the garage. There were no public comments. Smith asked for the Commission to see the decks plans to accomodate trading hardcover for hardcover. The applicant said he would be shrinking the size of the decking w ith or without approval for the pool Peterson said with removal of plastic and some deck, it would not be a large isue He also noted with all of the green space, there was good drainage on the property Smith said she felt there was a problem with trading the pool for plastic under an overhang and questioned whether the plastic would be back in place within five years The applicant said the house does not have a basement and the deck does help keep the rain away and would like to keep the deck by the house The odd-shaped lot was again noted by Schroeder. who reiterated no structure or hardcover was located in the 0-75' zone. Peterson said he would recommend approval with the applicant working with Statf to reduce hardcover beyond the 400 s.f reduction planned in the deck/patio area. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANTING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21. 1995 (#11- #2050 William Toles - Continued) Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve the request for hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to construct a swimming pool on the lake side of the existing residence with maximum hardcover allowance of 32 6?o with more reduction it possible. Ayes 6, Nays 0 (#12) #2054 TONY EIDEN COMPANY. 2700 COUNTRY SIDE DRIVE WEST - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 10:12-10:17 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mark Gronberg represented the applicant. Mabusth reported the application is for a conditional use permit required for filling of approximately 500 cubic yards of fill for an undeveloped property within the Old Crystal Bay Road Addition The fill would be an improvement on the drainage creating a gentler slope to the type 1 wetlands to the northwest. The drainage flows under Countryside but would have no impact on the approved drainage plan within the subdivision. The Engineer asked that erosion control be placed along the wetland prior to construction and a swale be constructed on the southeast side of the driveway to prevent drainage into the septic site areas Gronberg said the grading was necessary’ for creating a nice drive to the house as it could not be raised any further. There were no public comments Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, for approval per the Staff recommendations Ayes 6, Nays 0 Mabusth said Eiden would bring the application before the next Council meetinu. (#13) #2055 TONY EIDEN COMPANY, 2800 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE WEST/2425 THOROUGHBRED LANE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 10:17-10:28 P.M. The Cenificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted. The applicant's representative, Mr. Dillemd, was not present. Peterson suggested tabling the application, but those present in the audience asked to give their input at this time on the application MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#13 - #2055 Tony Eiden Company - Continued) Mabusth rcvicw’cd the application. The applicant is seeking to construct a monument at the subdivision entrance at Thoroughbred Lane and Willow and Old Crystal Bay Road and Countryside Drive West 30* in diameter with 50 linear feet ot retaining wall at height of 3- 3-1/2* The monument would be of a horse drinking water from a fountain A setback variance would be required because of the size ot the monument. Peterson said there was an e.xisting oidinance in effect dealing with entrance monuments, and it should not be changed The applicant, however, does have a right to come betore the Commission for a variance. A letter from Bruce Kokal asking for rejection ot the proposal was read into the minutes. Mabusth asked that all members of the audience present in relation to this application sign in on the attendance sheet for the record. There were 10 people present who were in opposition to the application Mabusth said she would notify the applicant of their displeasure with the proposal. Anne Bowman. 10 So. Willow Drive, said she w as not notified of the application. George Stickney said he lives at the end of the development. It was his opinion that the monumemt would create a huge maintenance and vandalism problem Stickney said the monument would be an issue tor the homeowners association. Sticknev’ said he was on the architectural review commission for the homes being built in the subdivision. Mayor Callahan was asked if it was required to table the application without the presence of the applicant. Callahan said there was no requirement to do so, but it w as what was cenerallv done. Schroeder moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #2055 Callahan asked Staff to convey to the applicant the feeling of the audience and the Planning Commission. Ayes 6, Navs 0 (#14) #2056 MICHAEL AND BARBARA WIGLEY, '035 TONKAWA ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 10:28-10:58 P.M. I he Ceaificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted Mrs. Wigley, and landscape architect. Matt Laue, were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELP ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#14 - #2056 Michael & Barbara Wiglcy - Continued) fiaffrnn reported that the application is for land alteration conditional use permit and variance to excavate in the 0-75' zone and to install boulder retaining walls. Code sections prohibit grading within 75’ of the lake, as well as any hardcover in that area, and requires a CUP for lakeshore alteration The application proposes two tiers of boulder walls; one at the top ot a 2 1 slope, the other at the base of that slope in the flood plain next to the lake The walls would taper to a 3.1 slope A retaining wall at the top of the slope would be extended to make the lawn level .A MCWD permit is required to build within that flood plain A previous contractor had been turned down by MCWD when he applied tor their permit. Gaflron said he had spoken with the MCWD, who saw no need for the walls Gaflron said he concurs with the finding that the walls would provide no significant stabilization Snowing an elevation sketch, Gaflron said the wall would be exposed 5-1/2 ot the 17' height at the lake. It would be difficult to screen all of this wall Gaflron said StatT sees little justification for the walls unless there was imminent tailure ot the slopes Walls are not normally approved by ihe City for aesthetic reasons or for surface soil erosion The erosion occurring by the house is in the . taded area Fill would make this area to the north and south more level and could possible be scrcenable with vegetation Staff currently views the site has having a natural state of shoreline, and changing it as proposed will yield a layered look u'ornamental vegetation The Engineer has found no problem with the proposal from an engineering standpoint, but notes there is no evidence that the slope is about to fail Gaflion said the hardcover had not been measured. There is mulch with fabric within the 0- 75', some of which Gaflron said should stay and svme should be remov ed There is likely a need to stabilize the grc"''^ ” h *re no grass is growing to control the erosion The drainage around the house drain'-1,. .ards the neighbor and fans out. Peterson asked the applicant why she felt the w:dls were needed .Mrs W'igley said it was her feeling that erosion was occurring on both sides ot the house as well as being the issue on the hill I ler main concern is for safety of her fami.y noting the vegetation on the hill is full of poison ivy and poison oak Wigley did not wish to remove the natural look of the hill w ith grass She said she is a maintenance-type person, w ho likes to take care of the problem before the hill fai«s down and would like to ren ove the poisong iv\ and oak Schroeder said the applicant could replace the poison ivy and oak with other vegetation without requiring boulder walls Gaflron said the City feels there is no need to grade the hillside to get rid of the poison ivy and oak, and there is no slope problem requiring the w all GatTron did agree that lev eling of the top area would be helpful Schroeder said he aureed that erosion was occurring on the sides of the house, and maybe at the top of the slope, but did not see any erosion at the bottom MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD TN AUGUST 21, 1995 («14 - #2056 Michad & Barbara Wigley - Continued) Petenon told the applicant that the Planning Commission does not want residents to wait until a hill is eroding, but he also did not see any problem except by the house The weeds and the structure on the hill should hold back the hill while revegetating according to Peterson. It was also noted that the stairway was in good solid condition Gai&on inquired about a drainage pif>c found on the property 1 he applicant said she had no idea what wras the reason for the pipe The contractor said he would check on the pipe. Laue said defoliating would t>e difficult and would kill the undergrowih Hawn asked what would be used to kill the poison ivy and oak voicing her concern with chemicals washing into the lake. Laue said a spray would be allowed to dry resulting in no run off Laue said the top wail would hold back erosion from the house area It is his plan create a swale with the boulder wall being located higher and the soil lower to catch the drainage and allow it time to percolate thru the soil I ane said an original permit was denied by the MCWD, not because ot the plan, but because the neighbor's contractor was under investigation. The neighbor was asking for a similar boulder wall Schroeder said it would be hard to believe that the permit was denied for any other reason than merit Schroeder said the City ’s Comprehensive Plan sets guidelines for lakeshore The Plan requires that natural vegetation be preserv ed as much as is practical If erosion is present, rip rap can be used The City recommends a natural look The applicant asked what was the definition of aosion It was noted that no erosion was noted by cither the Engineer. Staff, or the Planning Commissioners Schroeder said the only erosion noted was near the home, which can be assisted with walls at that location Wigley said she was looking at taking the grass out and putting in vegetation. Lane said the mulch will also be removed Gaffron asked if the walls were to be approved, what construaion process would be used for this project Laue said two options were available If permission were received from the neiuhbor. he would come across their propeny. drop the materials over the hill to be placed by a machine at the bottom The other alternative would be to bring in the wall material over the lake during the winter and install it in the spring GatTron read into the minutes a letter received from the DNR noting their concern with retaining w alls removing the natural vegetation, with screening, erosion control of the steep slopes, and concern over water level and ensuing construction. 20 11 iJ: ^mnirai Jiu; umf^ rt^^KUTt •iiira man nM9F\ KyiflCf] MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING C0M^^SS10N MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (^15 - <^2057 James Nystrom - Continued) Peterson said if a new house was built to the north, it also would be at the 75 line. Schfoedcr appreciated the tremendous improsements made in the proposal and saw no problem with the deck as there were hardships with the house. Hawn asked why the 10' side setbad:s could not be met Frazec said he worked with the floor plan trying to minimize room sizes to meet the requirement He found it would be necessary' to move rooms upstairs, and it was the intent ot the applicant to maintain an understated and lower profile Peterson read into the minutes a letter received from the DNR recommending denial of the application due to structure within the 0-75' zone The DNR determined a reasonable alternative would be to move the structure back 10' Peterson informed the apolicant that this is the only opportunity the City has to make properties meet current codes Schroeder noted lakesbore properties are a "Catch 22" proposition. Owners want to be on the lake, yet it is bad for the lake GatTfon noted that the average setback, lot area, and lot width problems are inherent to the property The pertinent faas relating to the existing and proposed houses were reviewed A major improvement with setbacks was proposed tor the garage Schroeder moved to approve .Application #2057 as proposed due to the obvious hardships of the property, the substandard lot, the considerable eflbrt to meet regulations, in particular the 0-75’ zone, to warrant the proposed exceptions There was no second to the motion Peterson said the property had the amount of space needed to move the house back and set the standards where they would meet City requirements. The applicant said there was a privacy issue involved The neighbor's screen porch being on the property line looks directly into the home Lindquist said, although the reasons were valid, many other applications also have valid reasons He noted it was becoming more ditficult to allow any encroachment into the 75' lakeshore area Schroeder agreed GatVron said the City cannot predict what will happen with other homes in the area Decisions cannot be made based on possible predictions The applicant said the home to the south was in good condition NfINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#15 - #2057 James Nystrom - Continued) ” ‘>PPli«'io". dray Ihe proposal, or PP 0 e the proposal with an amendment moving all structure out ohhe 75' area The app leant suggested amending the application to move the structure and deck back 10*. Lindquist m^. Smith seconded, to approve Application «057 isith the stipulation that all structure be moved back out of the 0-75’ setback zone. Ayes 6, Nays 0 SIIADYWOOD ROAD - COMMERCUL SITE PLAN/V ARIANCE - PUBLiC HEARING 11:22-l 1:55 P.M. The Certificate ot Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted The applicant and contractors, Keith Waters and Blake Bichanich, wwere present. Mabusth report^ that the proposal is for a commercial office building just south of the “Rd"'lfw A “P ^ '“»• -''o“f^icht CoRd 19 with a -50 frontage and zoned B-4 commercial The other lot to the rear sindrort-”t'"'i f Tk ran'Wned. and asmgle oflice building would be erected to house a national office center for Autografs. Inc. ’’"’’’T' °*'P"‘'i"S ^™lable to what actual usage is sol^l whh expansion if needed. The goal is to maintain open . pate with plantinp It is the applicant's desire to protect the wooded, treed area. There IS a provision lor future parking with the current plans Jena^Ti'r K 'a c ^PP'^'-'rat Would like to know if there is an ability to expand the building and parking into the residenti.il zoned area in the future if needed Retaining ponds would be located on the propertv with drainage foi the initial building a.nd expansion proposed to dram into the pond It would be connected with a 12" culvert aji drainage will be direcaed away from Kelley Avenue and to the east under County Road Ron Ramz relayed the background on the use 1 he building would he a corporate office ^d graphic design center using ,1M technology. The company is creating a^arketplace tor the technology The computer work and production would be perfomied on the prernises to include a printing area that would create the graphics thru computers that would go out to kiosks wiihm car dealerships nationwide The location was chosen due to neimess to j.M ind Rantz home The number of en.plovees would be limited The technology requires a controlled environment of temperature and humiditv for the printing process R.intz reported that there would be no chemical concerns as there is notllw toxic within the toners used The product is the same as that used in lazer toners The process electrostatically teeds oft ol the humidity and air. People are able to remain in the room throughout the process with no personal harm. 23 XONUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#16 - #2058 Ron Rantz/Autograts - Continued) Smith asked if there would be any materials needing discarding on the premises The applicant said he would need to look into that matter with 3M If a disposal area was needed, Berg asked where this w ould occur Mr V\ aters said it would be contained within the building. The lower level plan for the property is designed as a loading and receiving area, which would be covered and heated Deliveries by' UPS-sized trucks would be made about weekly with pick ups daily The film has to be stored in a controlled environment and then acclimated to the room The loading area would be part of the building itself Rantz said this loading area as well as the shipping areas were e.xcluded from the net floor area calculations Mabusth said the loading berth would not need to be included in the calculations but the shipping area should be Mabusth said in determining parking spaces, if shipping area is included in net tloor area, 67 parking stalls would be required It'S presently shown as 64. with 3 more needed. There would be no problem with locating those stalls on site. Schroeder asked how many employees would work in the building The 25-30 employees would be involved in administration and production with 10-15 graphic designers, who would be on a pan-time basis Rantz said 10-15 employees w ould be on the premises at one time Rantz said the building is large for the proposed business to be conducted, but large tables are needed, 20-25’ long to lay out the graphics The shipping area will require the space for vehicles to pull in for installation of graphics being provided for public reviewal. These vehicles would be used as models Schroeder asked if there would be a car w ash on the premises Ran,z said the cars would be sent out to be washed, even in the winter Only slight clean up will be conducted in the building. Rantz said the cars used as models would not be done on a daily basis They are fur experimental use only to .see if the graphic will work on a vehicle Testing the graphics on cars is needed to determine the perimeters Beru asked if the process w as odorless and requires any ventilation. The applicant .said the process is completely self-contained in a sealed controlled humidity The air is recirculated within the building. 3M is said to have an environmental room similar to the one proposed Mabusth asked the Planning Commission it this use was an appropriate use No variances would be reiiuired. and the lots would be legally combined 24 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING C0\LM1SS10N MEETING ffiLD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#16 - #2058 Ron Rantz/Autografs - Continued) Berg was informed, when ^ked. that no drainage would flow from this property to Kelly A\-cnue. Schroeder noted that the proposed building was very’ large for new technology' Waters said the technology has existed and proven to work Schroeder also reiterated the relayed information given bv the applicant ot an air inliltration system, similar to a big computer room, with no hazardous materials used. Smith asked if the product would be taken to ihe public or to businesses. She was informed that the product would be taken to the general public this tall as well as to a production center located in California The application ot the decals is peiiormed, hower/er, at the car dealerships The appropriateness of the use was discussed within the B4 zoning district Mabusth said the Planning Commission needed to determine if the business mc«»ts the intent of the B-4 zoning code Schroeder said the use as an olTice is met but other areas may be more problematic As a building for creative use, Peterson said it falls under items 11 and 18. The intent of the B4 is its relationship to residential area as an administrative office building with limited public access and no exterior sales Peterson said he saw the proposal as an appropriate use Hawn questioned the expansion and using residential propeny for the purpose of expansion The applicant said it w as unknown if expansion would be needed Mabusth said the residential lot could not be used for any expansion without rezoning Lindquist and Berg informed the applicant that they would probably not agree to allow any expansion within the residential area. The applicant asked why he should have to pay taxes on a piece of propeny if he is unable to expand onto it and has no use for it Mabusth said a 24' road would have been required and the 35' setback to rear lot line The applicant was showai to benefit with owning this lot as he would be able, with having the residential lot as pan of the combined lots, to construct the structure at the lot line without encroachment into the residential area Otherwise, there would be a 35' rear yard setback required. The combination of the three lots allows the applicant some tle.xibility. The applicant asked if he would be able to propose rezoiiing of the lot in the future. He was informed that this would be possible, but was also informed that the Planning Commission was unable to make such commitments to applicant This was an issue to be best addressed by the City Council Peterson moved. Sebjoeder seconded, to approve .Application #2058 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#16 - #2058 Ron Rantz/Autografs - Continued) Rantz asked if it could be proven that the parking was adequate for expansion, would the City allow 44 stalls Rantz was informed that this would be satisfactorv bu. no recommendation could be made for expansion into the residential zone SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#17) #2043 GORDON JAY BlIHRER, 2620 FOX STREET - SKETCH PLAN AND PROPOSED 2-LOT SUBDIVISION The applicant was not present. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2043. Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#18) #2047 LAKEMEW GOLF, 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE - SKETCH PLAN OF SINGLE LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Mr. Wenkstem was present GatTron said the sketch plan is for a 2-acre lot to be subdivided from the 130 acre golf course for a single family residence The land is unused and considered surplus The zoning is RRIB rural residental requiring 2 acres with 200’ frontage on the road. It is located outside the MUSA requinng septic and well There is sewer in the street but it is not accessible To change MUSA boundanes is problematic Connection would require .Met Council approval Staff recommends septic and well The mound-type septic sites in the sketch plan may work but there might be a need to expand the boundaries due to the steep slopes A southern driveway was determined to be the likely approach acco«-ding to the Enaineer Lindquist asked if the applicant proposes any other parcels to be divided from the golf course I he applicant said he was looking to build on the propeny for himself Wenkstem said he preferred the driveway to the north side to be ftinher from any balls beimi hit GatTron said the slope created problems with sight distance The applicant asked if there w as a setback for a dnveway entrance GatTron said Staff looks for 5' but there is no setback for dnveways There would have to be a separation as no grading is allow ed within 5’ of the lot line, and the intent is to proGde a place for snow storage on the lot next to the dnveway It was noted th.at septic testing would need to be completed 1 he applicant was informed that 80“ b of new systems are mound-type due to the soil conditions within Hennepin Countv 26 MINtJTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#18- #2047 LakcMCW Golf - Continued) Peterson commented that the Park Commission reviewed the sketch plan and did not propose a trail on the property but would ask for normal park dedication tees The applicant was informed that t^s amount would be 8% of the lot area or cash in the equivalence of 8*/« of the fair market value before development (#19) #2053 DENNIS PLATTETER, 809 NORTH BROWN ROAD - SKETCH PLAN OF A 3-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Mr. Flatterer was present. Mabusih reported that the plan is for a division of a 6 37 acre homestead, located to the north side of Sugar Woods development, into three lots M\ structures would be removed. The property is accessed via a platted road The propeny is on a natural environment lake to the northwest, the OHW is at 985 5 elevation 4 ot the total property is a type 3 wetland adjacent to the normal high water level Each lot is shown meeting the two acres of dry buildable It was noted that it the road were moved to the west, the lots would not have the 2 acres of dry buildable required. Lot 2 requires a lot width variance in its present configuration Mabusth reported that the septic would be mound-tvpe systems, and 3 were tested at an 8% slope The septic code specifically states that mound systems must be placed on a slope no greater than 6® o Staff could not recommend approval of 3 lot piat based on septic limitations fhe propertv is not located within MUSA Mabusth asked the Commission if they would recommend approv al of current layout? A lot width variance would be required for lot 2 that gains access via a long platted corridor. The lakeshore lot meets 200' at the lake and the 150' setback Flatterer said he has owned the property for 20 years The MUSA line is adjacent to the property to the south The propeny contains alot of sandy area. The applicant selected the building sites based on the views, maintenance ot trees and slopes, and then constructed the lot lines to meet the codes The applicant was informed that with a 150-200' long road, his likely choices would be for 3 executive lots or 2 hobby farms, with contemplation for larger cul-de-sacs required by the fire depanment Peterson said it was his opinion that the propeny consisted of tw o lots, not thiee. as there would be too much crowding in order to gain the proper septic Berg agreed with this conclusion 27 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21. 1995 (#19 - #2053 Dennis Piatteter - Continued) Lindquist said he would not agree to an area variance but would probably approve a width variance. \1abusth said the applicant does not have the acreage to allow’ lot 2 to be realigned and the road outlet extended to the 'St. The applicant inquired about a lot next to his property consisting ot only one acre. He was told it could only be rebuilt in the original footprint but septic approval would determine whether it was buildable or not. Flatterer was informed that the Park Commission recornmended asking for park dedication fee. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#20) REPORT BY PUVNMNG COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 14. 1995 (DALE LINDQUIST) No report was given. (#21) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 7. 1995 (CANDACE ROWLE ITE) Candace Row lette was absent but the Commissioners received copies of the drat) from the Park Commission pertaining to upcoming subdivisions (#22) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION No additional issues were discussed ADDITIONAL ITEMS (#23) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF .MINUTES OF THE JULY 17, 1995 MEETING Lindquist mov ed. Smith seconded, to approve the .Minutes of the July 17, 1995 .Meeting of the Planning Commis.sion .\yes b. Nays 0 :x KflNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONLMISSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (#24) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL No representative was selected ADJOURNMENT Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 12 25 a m. Ayes 6. Nays 0. Stephen Peterson^ Ch Person Metropolitan Council IVorking for the Region, Planning for the Future - ^ •* . A.’ V ■*.1 Regional Issues Community Forums Tlynirsday^ Sewteniter iS 8:30 —noon Nen' Bristow rtUHify) SerL'ice Center .'OO lodf SL NW 633-1190 T(;urs()^y; October 5 S;30-neoM EDen Prdirie CitM Center SoSo Mitchell Rjl 949-S300 Ke;^H0te n^DreSS: "PLinnhuj for the Future" Jim Sofent, Metro|^o[iUm Councif — Re^ioutif AOininistmtor Concurrent Sessions: ~ Tmnsit ReDe5i{)H — working ivitl) CoitmiuHities _ Capital Budgets — riruiHciH^ Tnmsit ifuiJKOL'etnents, Regional Parks and Wistenwter TreatuienL or 1010Regional Grou'tf; Options L ivakle C0h 1 n 1 1 1 nit ies: PomicitciHe —FmiDin^ Guit^efines & Critem clmujes to t(;e Land-filanning Act: Romi()tdfc[e--Housini| elements of the Comprehensive plan •k*J5 O To KSVP, CiiK Lmt Anne SLiJitli .it 101-^)409. -------------------0------------------- ^^Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future September 15, 1995 SEP 2 1 Dear City Manager, Here is the latest information on a possible work stoppage and interruption in transit service provided by the Metropolitan Council to communities throughout the region. Members of the Amalgamated Transit Union, representing bus drivers and mechanics, voted on Saturday, Sept. 9 to authorize a strike for Oct. 9 or earlier if union leaders deem it necesary. Because of a required 10-day cooling off period, the earliest that a strike could take place is Sept. 22. I have instructed our negotiating team to clear their calendars and work toward settlement within the financial limitations and service parameters facing the Council. We hope that state-mediated talks will result in a settlement. A strike will benefit no one. Should there be a strike, no transit service for about 97 percent of the region would be available. This is a substantial impact on customers who ride Transit Operations buses 220,000 tir* '. each business day. Many of these bus customers live in your community, and depend on transit to get to work, school and appointments. Also, there would be a dramatic impact on general traffic congestion and overall air quality, affecting your community. For our employees who work in the Council's Transit Operations area, and those of us who are colleagues and co-workers, the threat of a strike is also damaging to productivity and morale. The main issues in this impasse are the ability to change work rules, so that we can be more flexible and competitive in providing service, and the hiring of more part-time drivers to match the peaks in service. As you are well aware, during this time of shrinking public dollars, we need to live within our means. A shortfall of $10 million to adequately maintain the current transit system adds to this difficult situation. We are committed to resolving these issues quickly to retain the public's trust and expectations for reliable and efficient regional transit service. Your interest is appreciated and I ask that you share this update with colleages and elected officials. 230 East Fifth Strert St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612)291-6359 Fax 291-6550 An Equal Opfjomautif Emploger TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 ^----- • ^ ••,r n . • s \A^Noe. AWli (_aUK!iC.luK;lEVABE.RS ■~Tu^uv: ^lOu vou. 6,'JTrtOtV7JVi&> "Ttte Tn NAE OfV kw'ii POV\\)\WG> T UE “^ST (\VT 'li\(l.M\(l. CL k J u! ^/\}^ can't begin to tell you All the things this ought to say But there's a world of meaning In the thanks it brings your way! I nka Wcstonkn nrvn • A Y,si:rr. in. iri5 Iri vers 'ic mailer of loulc extra trips. nkc nrcnnfinuliy,- llic (lisiriu woi.jJ >lic *i.iinc driver' «»n year after ynr, vcnioiily 'They Ills mid llic f.MMilics said. philii^npliy applies ' liifv, he saiii. Tlie >il rnllicr noi use •ivers for rcnul.ir 1 when ahsoliiiclv •IS coithmie. 1.14 . me la I witulow ss), aulo haliencs. 'i each, sicreos. V(.*Us. IS, tompiilcis. No lephoncs, radios, pc players, this liargcahle and lives. ks: A coninincr d al no ehnrge. louschold ♦ fiec. If you bring i tig bill, they wilt •II may piireliasc a . . . Cunt, on P. 0 IT FELT like fail one morninK last neck and (he nip in the nlr had the cccse in Mo..n.f. r.ri. . I'ark on the move ~ Trom the north end of the park to the south end. •-unniuio fi\ mi I. iioi.M Survey finds low awareness of community-center plans By l^orrlc Ham Wcsionka area residents generally supported the eonsinivtiiMi (>f ,i new coiiiiiiunity tciHcr over minimal repair, coric compliaiHc and dou iivizing of the current i oniiuuniiy center, according t«> die levulls of a Coinniuinty (renter Survey cofuluited by Decision Resources, Inc. Dr. Hill Morns, representing Decision Resources, Inc., presented the complete results of llic survey hi the Mouml City CtniiK fl I'licsday night Hie survey was conducted as a menns for the Wcsionka Community Center task Force to gather pulilic input on an area coinmuiiity center l>cforc making a rccnmnicndaonn lo (he Westonka Ro.ird of Fducniion Mic suivcy was concluded by tcicplicmc between July 10 and 18 A liiial of 5(H) households look part HI the survey, including 100 Minnctrista icsidcnts. 100 Orono residenis. 190 Mound residents. KH) Spring Park rcsulcnts and 10 Independence and Shoreview residents. According to Dr. Morris, only 30 percent of the residents surveyed were aware of discusscons between the cities ami ihc sdiooj district about an area cornmunilv center Of those who were aware of such discussions, nearly half knew only that there was a prc'posjl. but no specifics and 32 percent thought that discussions centered around the budding of a new community center I .ivorabic icaclioiis. sucli as nccfl for such a fnciliiv and gootl inipact on cliildien and llic loiiimuniiv. were mdii.nfcd by 51 percent «)f the rcs|M)ndcnts who u-fc .Tw.irc (d Ihc proposal Unfavornhlr rcacfions poinicd to Ihc lack (’I need and already liiph t.iscs. Ry a 48 percent fo 32 percent judgment, residents supported the construction of a new community center over mimmal icpair. code Por k chop dinner scheduled Sept. 22 The Westonka Senior Center will host a pork ch<'»p dinner compliance and do\» nsi7ing of ihc cunent comniumiy center. According to the survey. Ihc new community center proposal would combine 19 tmihon dollars in existing bond rcrcicndum fuiuU and land provided by the district with revenue raised ihroiigli the issuance of mtimcipnl hoiuls lo finance cons!nicin«n n»c new building could conlain all communiiy cciiicr services as well as expanded recreational facilities The new venter wouUI also contain the sr'.ool district district, coHiin-nity education. ^ nCFE^ and special^ education offices The ccnlcT coiilJ* he operated through a joint powers agreement between the local municipalities .and the schoril dhsirict, according to the survey. The other proposal prcscnlcd in the survey would provide minimal repairs and maintenance of Ihc current community ccnicr. along with compliance with minimum code siandards for lire safety and acccssihilitv Included in ihis propt)sal is the downsizing of the current facility by the dcnudilion of the 19^9 portion of the cc Her. except for the gymnasium. Under this projv>sal. 1.9 million dollars in existing bond referendum funds would be utilized to make some mintmai repairs and limited improvcmcnls lo the current structure, but no major facilities additions or renovations would be made. The sc Iuk )| district would contimic lo i»peinic the ccnicr with Ihcif programs and vcrviccx icmaining siihslaniially tiiu h.iiigcd. Ihc survey icsulis mdu .tied a clear piclciciuc loi a new I icilily over minor iciiKHleliHg nl ilu* lurrciil center, said I )i Mmiis. Key f.icihlics ih.il icMdenis \.ml they wouUI like to vec im huled in a communiiy center iiu hided yoirlli and senior eenicis. gvinn.isimn. exercise/ filiicss crnlcr aiul iiulot»r leisure s umiiiing |>oo| A pro^vteil V5 |»eKcm of the hcHisehoId** survcycil said fhev would use the pi. poscil community renter, a ligurc cofiMsicnl with projcvicd uscrship at the same point m imie to the suiccsslul l.u 'litres ill the uhes of M.iplewtHHl and C haska. noiod |)i Moi I IS. Iltil wliile surveyed icsitlcnis v\crc willing lo pay more than the suburban norm l»»r a daily jmss lo use the ccnicr. they w-cic unw illing to pay as mucli as the suhinhaii iioirn for family or individual mcnil>crships In general, residents were willing to see their properly taxes raised by a moderate amount (S3.90 per immth) lo fund the construcliun of a new community center Hut onclinrd were opposed lo any lax increase for facility consiructinii. said l.’)r. Moriis, ill concluding his icporl. r nka U'csionir/i nrvn Y,M:IT. IK I7*J5 hivers Uc nuiucr of itMiic extra trips. ..nkc rtf*‘crtiifinulty. •* the (iiMrict wotjlJ the x.jinc clrivcf'i nii year after year, ''Cnioiify **'11icy [icl niui the f.iMiilicx said. philosophy applies ' tiips. he saitl. The Id rather not use •ivers for rcpular • when ahsoluiely IS continue. 1.14 . metal window •ss). auto batlerics. s: each, stereos, VeUs. !S. computers. No Icphones. radios, ipe players. Ihis • hargcahle and ’UCCS. ks: A containci il at no charge, 'louschold • lice. It you hnnp .i lip hm. they will Ml in.iy puichase a . . . Cunt, on r. 6 IT l i:i,T like fall one murninj* last week and the nip in the air had the gerse In Mound's Carlsim I’ark on the move ~ from the north end of the park to the south end. iiioio hv nn i imi m Survey finds low awareness of community-center plans Hy l^rrlc Ham Wcsionka area rc.sidcnts gcncr.ally supported the consinictinn of a new community center over minimal repair, ccxic comfdiaiHC and dowiiviring of the current cmnintinit y center, according to the results of a CiMiiniiinily Center Survey CondiKtcd hy l)ci isiiui Resources, IrK*. Dr Bill Morns, representing Decision Resources. Inc., presented the uuiiplctc results of the survey to the Mimnd City Council Pucsilay night. 1 he survey was conducted as a tienns for the Westonka Community Cciucr i ask force Ur ga\hcr public input tui nn area coimnunily venter Ixrforc making a rccommc ulalion lo ihc WcMonka Boanl of fihic.uion • Ihc survey was conducted bv iclcpluinc between July 10 and IH, A total of 5(H) households Itnik part in Ihc survey, including 100 Minnctrista rcsulcnis. 100 Orono fcsidents. 190 Mound residents, 100 Spring Park residents and 10 Independence and Shoreview residents. According lo Dr. Morns, only 30 percent of the residents surveyed were aware of discussions between the cities and the school district about an area community center. Of those who were aware of such iliscussions. nearly half knew only that there was a proposal, but lur specifics and 32 percent thought that discussions centered around the building of a new community venter. 1 avorahic reactions, such as nccil for such a facility and gotni mipact on children and the comiiuinily. were imlicnicd by 51 percent of the respondenis who were awnre (»f ihc propos.il Unfavoralilc rcaciums poinicd to the lack of need and alrcndv high l.iscs. By a 48 percent to 32 percent judgment, residents supported the construction of a new community center over minimal repair, code I^ork chop dinner scheduled Sept. 22 The Westonka Senior Ccnicr will host a pork chop dinner compliance and downsiring of the cuiTcnt community center. According to the survey, the new community center proposal would combine 19 million dollars in existing bond rcfcicmlum fuiuls and land provitied by the district with revenue rnisctl ituoiigh the issuance of municipal bonds to finance conslmctn»n. Tlic new budding crnild contain all community center services as well as expanded recreational facilities Ihc new ccnicr wmilil also contain the school district district, community education, ECFE^ and special^ education offices The ccntcT coiilj* be <ipcraicd through a joint powers agreement between ihc local municipalities and the school disiricl, according to the survey. The other proposal presented in the survey would provide minimal repairs and mnmicnancc of the current community ccnicr. along with compliance with minimum code standards for fire safely and accessibility. Included in this proposal is the downsizing of the current facility by the demolition of the 1939 portion of the ccnicr. except for the gymnasium. Under Ihis proposal. 1.9 million dollars in existing bond referendum funds would be utilized to make .some mininal repairs and limited improvcincnis to the current structure, but no major facilities additums or renovations would be made. Tlie school disli;cl would continue to operate the ienter with their programs and services icinaining siibstanti.iily uik h inged. Ihc siincy icmi Iis itidii ated a i leai piclcicnic loi a m-w l.n ililv ovci minor icimMichiig of the iniicnl venter, s.iid I >i Moms Key faciliiics that lesideiiK s.iid they would like to see nu ludid in ,\ comnittnily ccnict iik hided voniti ami senior vcnicts. gynin.ismiii. exercise/ fitness center and nidi*i»f leisure swiniining |>oo| A projevled 3.5 |x*iiCiil of the households survcycil said tltcy would use the pioposcd community center, a figure lonsiefcnl with projcvted uscrship at the same pomi m lime to the siK kCssful l.u ililics III the i ilics of MapiewiMMi and (.’havka. iioteil Di Moms. But while surveyed icsidcnts were willing to pay moic l!ian the suburban norm for a daily pass lo use the ccnicr. they weic uiiw tiling lo pay n.s much as the suhnihan norm for family nr individual mcnil>crships In general, residents werc^ willing to see their piopcrly taxes* raised by a modcr.aie ninonnt (S3 90 per mouth) lo fund the consiniclion of a new community venter But one-third were opposed lo any tax increase for facility construction, said Dr. Moms, in concluding his icptHt. ~ iffi'Orr- f \'^>":'^-lAv-'-.<J';' A CITYof OROXO Municipal Offlcca Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parnway Ofonc. MN 55355 Mailinf Address; P.O. Bo* 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 GC66 September 25, 1995 Richard Young Police Chief South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Dept. 810 E.xcelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Dear Chief Young: This morning I received information that there may be concern among members of the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safet>’ Department regarding rumors that the Cit>’ of Orono is pursuing the provision of police services to Tonka Bay. I assume these rumors may have originated in relation to the study currently under way regarding police services in the Lake Minnetonka area. Because I am co-chair of the study comminee, the letters to the police chiefs have gone out under my signature. The rumors were probably further fueled by the letter to the editor in the September 21, 1995 Lakeshore Weekly News that indicated the Tonka Bay Mayor had recently called for Tonka Bay to look into switching to the Orono Police Department for police service. This letter is to assure you that the City of Orono is not pursuing the provision of police services to the City of Tonka Bay. There have been no discussions between myself and the Orono Cit>' Council, or between the Tonka Bay Cit\’ Council and the Orono City Council, regarding Orono providing police serv ices to Tonka Bay. 1 regret any concerns or problems this rumor may have caused to you or your depanment. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse Citv Administrator Telephone (612) 473-7357 ♦ FAX 473-0510 SEE OVERSIZED DOCUMEnT!!