Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-14-1995 Council Packet
T AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MLNNESOTA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL *1. CONSENT AGENDA V. AUg , . ■“•■///.iff APPROVAL OF MINirreS *2. Regular Meeting of July 24, 1995 ^^OHio / s/- . P ^ PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Shcrokec Use Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dale Lindquist Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ' 'f < u) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3.#2032 Miciiael and Lynne Gerhlichcr. 1375 Rest Point Road - Variances - Resolution 4.#2033 Donald and Arlene Kiellcy. 1670 Sliadywood Road - Variances - Resolution 5.#2036 Robert J. Gountanis. 1098 Loma Linda Avenue - Variances - Resolution 6.#2038 Richard licit, 1153 Elmwood Avenue - Variances - Resolution 7.#2040 Doug Olson, 2601 West Lafayette Road - Variances - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT ^ 8.Change Order #1 (Completion Date) Lift Station #7 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT ^ 9.Appointment of Insurance Agent of Record *10. Moratorium on Development in the Highway 12 Area - Ordinance 11.School Liaison Officer Program Agreement 12.Scheduling of Budget Work Session *13. Sale of Police Vehicle *14. Temporary Easement - Willow Drive/IIighway 12 Projec. .rl5. Resolution and Agreement for Use of Hennepin County’s GEO Data Base 16.Long Lake Water Quality Project and Cooperative Agreement - Update Cn Y AT I OICSEY’S REPORT (*I7.) LICENSES (*18.) BILLS 1AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 14. 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 08/14 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 08/16 - Highway 12 i’olicy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. 08/21 - Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. 08/28 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 08/29 - Joint Council/Planning Commission work session 8:00 a.m. 09/04 - HOLIDAY - Labor Day 09/05 - Tuesday - Park Commission 7:15 p.m. 09/11 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 09/18 - Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. 09/25 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. t w ttAHHQIS COIDiZSSZQB COUNCIL V \ PUBLICATTENDANCE MEETING DATE ^ ^ ^ S C _ _ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CIIY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 . 18. 19. 20. d w ORONO Cirv' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 24,1995 ROLL I \ % f'V Oi* ^ .The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following mcmlws presert / ^ /p, Mayor Edward Callahan, Jr., Council Members J. Diaim Goctten, Gabriel Jabbour, JoEUen Hurr, and Charles Kelley. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gcrhardson, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Qcnn Cook, City Attorney Kevin Staumon, and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7;05 p m. (*#1) CONSENT AGENDA Items #4, 5, 8, 9. and 12 were added to the Consent Agenda Goctten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5. Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES V (•#2) REGULAR MEETDIG OF JULY 10,1995 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approv e the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 10. 1995 Ayes 5, Nays 0 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS James White reported the Commission members are completing an open space presentation surv ey at this time. The Friends of the Park Award will be given cut at the August meeting to two Girl Scout Troops and the Orono Baseball Association. White reported seeing people using the bike trail adjacent to the Dickey property. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Planning Commision was present. PUBLIC COMMENTS <>?v, 'i .*■> There were no public comments. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24,1995 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#3) #2005 SAILORS WORLD MARINA AND BOAT CLUB, 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3582 Hurr questioned the deUy of the landscape installation at the manna and mquired of the final date for the installation. Mabusth s^ DeSantis thought the landscaping should be completed by the end of the season The marina is currently removing pollutants found on the property. A concern is with continued pollution leaking onto the property from the gas station at 1960 Shoreline Drive. Mabusth said DeSantis is doing his part in the poDution removal but it has been difficult to locate a person responsible for the pollution the gas station. Hurr asked that the Council see the landscape project completed prior to next spring. Mabusth recommended the end of the fall for a status report. Hurt said she was concotied with boat storage getting in the way of completion of the landscape plan at the end of the season. Jabbour asked Staff that the resolution reference both businesses. Sailors World and the Minnetonka Art Center, regarding the sharing of rvking stalls. Jabbour would like to see both businesses revisit^ at the same time so a proper count can be taken. Callahan reiterated the policy of ofl- site parking should have never been started Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3582 with a status report on the landscape plan by September 15, 1995 Ayes 4, Nays 0, Abstain 1, Jabbour abstain. (*#4) #2025 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 WATERTOWN ROAD - VACATION OF DRAINAGE & UTILITT' EASEMENT - RESOLUTION #3543 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3583 for the vacation of drainage and utility easement. Ay« 5, Nays 0 (•#5) #2026 NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE, 875 W AYZATA BOULEVARD - VARUNCES - RESOLUTION #3584 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3584. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) #2034 MARY & GENE ZULK, 1400 CHERRY PLACE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3585 Mr. & Mrs. Zulk were present. f- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD ON JULY 24,1995 (#6 - Mary & Gene Zulk - Continued) Mabu^h reported that the i^>plication is for a 10x26* covered deck addition to the street side of the residence. No setback variances are required. There is an increases in lot coverage and 48 s f. of additional hardcover. 175 s f. of stone patio will be removed. The Planning Commission said they did not wish to see applications unless additional hardcover is removed. Mabusth said the improvement is the least amount to make the best use of the lot. The allowed structural coverage is 15 “ o, or 1711 s.t. and exists at 17.6 and proposed at 19.9^i Mabusth confirmed that the increase in hardcover results from a structural improvement, while the removal ot stone patio is not structural hardcover. Callahan said several recent applications address this issue of exceeding the lot coverage and hardcover limits. According to the code, Callahan said a real hardship must be demonstrated in order to exceed the allowable structural coverage, adding that eliminating flower beds to enable additional structure does not fit the comprehensive plan's intent. The non-structural should have no bearing on structural Callahan asked that Staff and the Planning Commission to adhere to the poliev’. Mabusth said the Planning Commission does look at reducing hardcover. In this case, the commission knew they were dealing with a substandard lot and looked at where removal could be accomplished. Hurr said if the deck were reduced in width to 8' instead of the 10' requested, this would satisfy the hard.ship and enable the applicant to still receive what they desire, and would result in no gain of hardcover The applicant said he would prefer the 10' width adding that the lot is small, and he lias been unable to obtain any additional land. The neighbors are said to be aware of the project as well as supportive of it. Zulk said the addition fits the house and the neighborhood and will allow safe access to two doors. An elderly relative is li\ ing at the home Zulk commented that the Planning Commission had said no more hardcover would be allowed on the property without existing structure removed, and he has no intention of doing so. Hurr said the safety issue does not relate to the porch itself It was also added that the applicant was aware of the substandard size of the lot w hen he purchased the propeny. Hurr said a hardship would be not to have access that was sale. Kelley added that this still docs not speak to the Issues brought up by Mayor Callahan. If the structural hardcover is allowed, the hardcover would still be over the limits even if reduced I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24, 1995 (#6 * Mary & Gene Zulk Continued) Goetten said a safe access is necessary but there is twice the amount of hajucover located in the 75-250* K>ne than allowed. An option was to make changes allowing the applicant to rcfigure the hardcover in ways that would allow it to meet the requirements. Zulk said they had waited a long time for the porch and fed it is important. Goetten said it no new net increues were made, then it would be satisfactory'. Zulk responded that there was not much hardcover with a small sidewalk and elc\'ated parking area and had carefully considered the porch and how it would fit into the lot and neighborhood. Jabbour said Zulk should make the choice between decreasing the porch width 2* or refiguring the hardcover to not exceed the maxiraum allowed Jabbour added that if Zulk did not make the choice, someone else would do it for him Hurr said she would prefer a reduction in the porch width while Goeteen would okay whatever would meet the standard. Jabbour commented that the Council as a body should commit to not diverting from the policies. Concern was voiced over the trading of illegal non-conforming hardcover for new structure, and trading possibly newly made non-structural hardcover to gain structural hardcover. Hurr was concerned that the Council did not have a handle on the driveway situation with no policies regarding ensuring newly installed driveways do not exceed hardcover limits Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Resolution #3585 on the condition that the deck be limited to a size 48 s.f less than proposed Ayes 5, Nays 0. Callahan commented that the Council needs to control strurtural coverage, but not by balancing hardcover. Zulk asked if this was to begin tonight with his application. Zulk was informed that the policy has been in place and did not begin with this application. Discussion was had on the inability to distinguish between legal and illegal non conforming hardcover and structural/non-structural hardcover in the codes Callahan said there were two policies in place. There is a policy on lot coverage, and there is a policy that no hardcover is allowed within 75* of the lake, either structural or non- structural. This hardcover, according to Callahaa should be removed under all circumstances Mabusth questioned if there w as enough area to support the structural or non-structural hardcover, and if it does not exceed the hardcover percentages, would the City ask the home owner to remove it Callahan again referred to the two policies If there was illegal, non-structural hardcover, it should be removed Callahan said the Planning Commission was not adhering to these policies citing how removal of plastic underlavment, which should not be there in the first place, is counted as removal towards the excess hardcover. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL meeting held on JULY 24,1995 (#6 • Maiy & Gene Zulk - Continued) Callahan said the City could retjuire hardcover removal withtnit an application in process. If the City were to enforce their policies, Callahan said homeouners could be asked to remove hardcover where it is not permitted. Hurt commented that permits are not required for driveway and creates a catch 22 situation. Jabbour said plastic and rock could be added prior to an application and survey and then used as a trade off tor new structure. The total existing hardcover should be compared to the total proposed only according to Jabbour. Mabusth asked if the Council would like to see the non-structural hardcover in the hardcover analysis. The problem with this is the lack of records of illegal hardcover which did not go through the application process This was considered to be unenforceable without permits. Gafiron said the City is the agency that grants the hardcover variances If there is no good reason to grsmt a hardcover variance, then it should not be granted. Further, the structural/non-structural policy and other hardcover policies should be written into a policy resolution or code. Gaft'ron said lot coverage and hardcover are separate issues. Callahan suggested policies be written separately for the two. The definition of structure was read. Callahan concluded that both circumstances of lot coverage and hardcover might add structure to a resident and should focus on this. Moorsc said Staff will investigate this further. Hurr commented that the code does not allow for any plastic or fabric under rock, and tWs also should not be permitted. ?.IAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Callahan inquired of the maintenance project closing off CoRd 15 in the Minnetonka Beach area. Long delays were noted and rerouting of traffic was suggested to CoRd 51. Callahan noted that all Council members have had the opportunity to attend meetings concerning the potential provision of sew er serv ice to various City neighborhoods with Hurr attending a meeting scheduled for July 27 Gaflfon w as commended for his outstanding presentations and his excellent effons in conducting the neighborhood meetings. Callalian reported on the LMCD Budget Meeting coming up The City has written a letter voicing their disapprov al of the LMC'D budget Moorse and Jabbour will be attending the meeting and making a presentation. Other Cities have been notified of Orono’s viewpoint. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD ON JULY 24.1995 (Mayor/Council Report - Continued) Sev era! meeting dates were discussed for a joint work session with the Planning Commission, August 8, 9, or 10, with August 8 as the preferred date in connection with the moratoriums. The Park Commisaon members will be invited to attend. Council discussed if a public meeting should be held concerning Hwy 12 It was decided to wait to schedule a meeting until after the August 16 Highway 12 policy committee meeting. Jabbour suggested Mn/DOT representatives attend the meeting to update the public on what has been done so far Goetten commented on the different positions taken between Bonestroo, the DNR, and the MCWD concerning the Long Lake Improvement Project Goetten questioned whether this issue should appear on the Planning Commission agenda for August as anticipated. The project plans and changes were dis'Aissed from beginning to the current status, from installing aerators to using alum for lake clarification. % Jabbour said Commissioner Maple informed him an agreement had been signed with an Orono resident concerning a 2 acre pond on Orono Moorse said there has been no agreement reached for the 6 acre pond proposed in Medina. Jabbour did not recommend signing an agreement until the MCWD knows what their long term plans are. GafFron updated the Council on the project. The pond in Orono was originally designed at 5-6 acres, but was reduced to 2 acres, and the MCWD then began to pursue land for an additional pond in Medina. Hurr said she felt it w'as premature to discuss the mechanics of the project without an agreement. Jabbour said the MCW D will go ahead with the project with or without the approval of Orono They are now coming before the City as an applicant and would like the City as a partner. Callahan asked that updated information be presented, along with an agreement, at the next Council meeting, which is scheduled prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Moorse said he spoke with a board member, who did not want to consider an agreement until the parameters were all worked out Callahan said he had thought this had already been done. Moorse said he would contaa the MCWD and ask for an agreement Jabbour informed Moorse that he should discuss this further with Gene Strommen as there are mixed feelings on the MCWD board on how to proceed. ftfflnjTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24,1995 (Mi^or/Couficil Report - Continued) Hurr cononeAed on the City's failure to prevail in the Lasher Landing issue The Attorney suggested the City evaluate what could be done in order to take action on sinuiar properties Staunton will pass the utformation on to Barrett for the next Council meeting. Kefley brought up the complaints of Lord Fletchers on their use of the parking lot by non-employees. Moorse said Lord Fletchers has indicated they are not abusing the privilege and only staff are being shuttled A complaim two weeks ago was followed up on. Lord Fletchers indicated the Lafayette Club also has a shuttle and could be using the parking lot for their customers. Lord Fletchers said they would check on the situation. Moorse has not heard any further complaints. Jabbour said he had spoken with the assistant manager at the Lafayette Club. He informed her that the parking lot is not to be dominated by any one business. The manager said they had asked and received permission from the police chief and (danned on making arrangements with the Minnetonka Center of Arts. Kelley inquired if the residents of Old Beach Road have approached the City of Minnetonka Beach concerning the left turn lane off of CoRd 15. This has not been done. It was further noted that this was not a condition of the road closure. Kelley noted that when the Council asks the Park and Planning Commissions to review a particular issue, it does not mean that changes will l<e m^tde He emphasized that a review is a time to evaluate, not necessarily a ' .in* tu change. Jabbour extended his sympathies to Tom Barrett concerning Tom's father. Jabbour asked that the City respond to the letter from Tom Swanson concerning the lack of Orono representation on the LMCD Jabbour said it was imponant to note that Orono is in attendance at the LMCD meetings, and ge-ierally the only ones in the audience. Moorse said he will respond with a letter and asking Swanson to call Jabbour. Callahan inquired of a letter from the U S. Post Office. Moorse said there is a need for a new facility in the southern portion of the metro area, and is proposing a southwestern site. It is not located in this specific area. MlNimS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24,1995 (#7> VOLUNTEER COMMISSION APPOINTMEIVTS Callahan commented he was pleased with the number and caliber of qualified applicants. With onhr one slot to fill on each commission. Callahan asked Staff to recommend to the applicants that thdr names be left on file for future openings Kelley questioned whether this has been done with past qualified applicants. Moorse said they had not been directly solicited Council agreed that this should be part of future procedures. Callahan suggested the appointment of Andrew McDermott for the Park Commission position. McDermott is a 8-year Orono resident with a work experience m wildlife management and architecture which would be helpful to the commission. Hurr asked about McDennott’s original application to the Planning Commission It was noted that his heart is in the matter of parks. When an opening was announced on the Park Commission, he reauested his application be chanued to that field of aoDlicants, Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the appointment of Andrew McDermott to the Park Commission for a term that exoires on 12/31/95. Aves 4. Navs 0. Abstain 1; Hurr abstain as she was not in attendance during the interview process. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to appoint Elizabeth Hawn to the Planning Commission Goetten noted the number of qualified applicants for this position also and asked Staff to add their names to the list for future openings. Ayes 4, Nays 0, Abstain 1; Hurr abstain as she was not in attendance during the interview process ENGINEER REPORT (»#«) PAY REQUEST #4 BROWN ROAD/WATERTOWN ROAD Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the request for payment ^ lor the Brown Road/Watertown Road proiect to Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of S78.034.51. Ayes 5, Nays 0. cm’ ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (*#9) DOG REGUL.\TION AND LICENSING ORDLNANCE AMENDMENT #137, 2ND SERIES Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Ordinance 137, 2nd Series, an ordinance amending Section 9.12 Dog Regulation and Licensing. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#10) MOR.ATORIUM ON SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS REQUESTING USE OF A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY TO SERVE 3 OR MORE LOTS - ORDINANCE #138, 2ND SERIES Callahan said the language w as obscure but was in favor of the moratorium • %^ONUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24,1995 & (#10 - Moratorium on Private Driveways Serving 3 or More Lots - Continued) Kelley moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt the moratorium ordinance as proposed. Ayes 5, Navs 0. Jabbo’iT clariiied that the moratorium would apply to new subdivisions requiring a variance but not to those meeting the normal standards. Moorse said it would apply to those asking for 3 or more residences served from a private driveway. (#11) MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTH HIGHWAY 12 AREA - ORDINANCE Callahan requested the moratorium be extended to include the land south of Highway 12 to the Buiiincton Northern railroad tracks and west to Stubbs Bav Road, and the land west of Old Crystal Bay Road between Highway 12 and County R oad 6. It was noted that even though part of this land is residential and would not app >. it should be included. A new description of the area included in the moratorium r. z the resolution will be brought back to the Council for approval. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to table the Moratorium on the Hwy 12 Corridor to allow the modification to be made to the resolution. .Aves 5, Nays 0. (*#I2) CDBG AGREEMENTS - RESOLUTION #3586 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to app/'^'-c Resolution fr3586 authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the third party and subrecipient agreements for the year XXI 1995 CDBG .Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) PAVING OF REAR YARD OF PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE AREA Gerhardson reported that the rear yard is in need of paving as the vehicles are dragging in too much dirt and debris from the rear yard area. It has been found that it is impossible to clean the area thoroughly as material, such as wire and glass, is getting into the tires of the vehicles. Hand raking has helped. Gerhardson also noted that the type of use incurs about a 1" loss of gravel each year. The original plan was to pave the foot print of the cold storage area but it has beer, found that more area is needed for the mixina of sand and salt bv the shed. The paving will consist of 3" of bituminous. A good base is already in place. The bids have been done on a per unit basis to a cost advantaue for the City. Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the paving of the rear yard of the Public Works aaraae area at a cost of S7.500 to be ftinded from the Building Fund with an expenditure budget increase of $7,500. Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGLT^R ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 24, 1995 (#13 - Paving of Rear Yard of Public Works Garage Area - Continued) Kelley asked if there were plans for storing anvthing in this area Crerhardson said it would be used as a work area oniv. It was further noted that seal coatinu of other areas will be completed next year. Seal coating is done three years after the bituminous is laid. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT The City Attorney had no report. (*#I4) LICENSES Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the following Special Events Permit Licenses Aves 5. Navs 0. Keith Waters & Associates, Inc. 2900 Deer Run Trail Parade of Homes Open House 9/9/95 through 9 '24/95 Tony Eiden Company 2630 Countryside Drive West Parade of Homes Open House 9/9/95 through 9/23/95 (•#15) BILLS Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Pavinent of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, Nays 0 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at S .O p m Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mavor AITEST; Dorothv M Hallin, Citv Clerk I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % DATE: August 1, 1995 H ITEM NO.: Department Approral: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Titte Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zonine Item Description: #2032 Michael and Lynne Gerlicher, 1375 Rest Point Road - Variances Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Approximate lot area = 30,634 s.f. or .7 acres List of Exhibits H - Neighboring Property Owner's Letter I - Petition of Majority of Neighbors Approving Installation of Fence as Proposed by Gerlicher Brief Description of Request Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated July 5. 1995 and the Planning Commission minutes of July 17th for more background and detail on this review. ^efcr to rxhibil D, the applicants seek height and setback variances for a 6 ’ privacy fence to lie installed for an 80’ segment along the street lot line a.id 30’ along the side lot line located v’ithin the street yard. Applicants were stopped in the process ot installing new privacy fencing ..t tlte same location as the former privacy fencing on the property. Sections of the fencing that have been installed conform to the ordinance. Planning Commission members were concerned with the safety issues created with the installation of privacy fencing along a very limited and narrow roadway used by seseral property owners. The ■’pplicants noted that fencing is only 3 1/2 ’ high at the entrance to the driveway. Members were concerned with the intense vegetation in area noting the vegetation may present a sighting problem for users of the driveway and the adjacent public road. Three members of the four member Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as proposed based on the unique findings and hardships set forth in the applicants ’ hardship statement. They conditioned approval on applicants working with City staff to improve sight lines at intersection by trimming back on the dense plantings. The minority opinion opined that tl City code should be upheld because of the negative impact with the creation of alley ways of fencing. If fencing was to be maintained at a 3 1/2 ’ height, it would minimize the visual impact of the solid, 6 ’ high privacy fence. 1 Request for Council' Action continued Page 2 of 2 August 1, 1995 Zoning File #2032 L ^ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, S13DFVISION 15 (C) AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #2032 WHEREAS, Michael B. Gerlicher and Lynne K. Gerlicher (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1375 Rest Point Road within the City ot Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: All of Lots 15. 22 and 23. and all that pan of Lots 16, 17, and 21 which lie South of a line drawn from the Southwest comer of said Lot 21 to a point in the East line of said Lot 16, and which point is situate 1 foot South from the Northeast comer of said Lot 16, together with anv vacated alley which lies between the lots herein described, all being in the Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Park. Lake Miruietonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following-described property: Lot 23 and all that part of Lots 15 and 22 and adjacent vacated alley. Subdivision of Lot 14. Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka. Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the following-described line; Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 15 distant 75 teet Northeasterly from the Southeasterly comer of said Lot 23; thence Northwesterly to the Southeasterly comer of said 1-ot 22; thence Northwesterly on a line forming an angle of 74o55* with the Easterly line of said Lot 22. to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and there ending (hereinafter "the property ’); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) and Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a 6 1/2’ privacy fence to be located at the side and street lot line in the rear yard of a lakeshore lot that does net abut a major thoroughfare where only a 3 1/2’ height fence is allowed and the fence will be located 0’ from the lot lines where a 30’ setback is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: Pace 1 of 5 r 1. 2. 3. 4. FCSDCSGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2032. The property is located in the LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 30,634 s.f. or .7 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17, 1995, and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Original privacy fencing had existed on property for over 18 years. B Applicants’ desire for privacy fence due to location of the residence to roadway at south and public alley to the east. C. Sloping topography adjacent to Rest Point Road places both road and house at the same elevation. D.Need to minimize impact of car lights, etc. from nearby driveways and public roadway. E.Majority of homeowners within the area support privacy fencing and its proposed height and location and have submitted a written petition notifying City of this approval. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 . II im ini I 7-r 5. The City CouncO has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby jgrants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above to permit the installation of a 6 1/2’ high privacy fence to be installed at side and street lot lines located within the rear yard. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. 3. 4. Applicant to obtain a building permit for the installation of the 6 1/2’ high privacy fence within the street yard of the property. Inspection staff to review the sieht lines at the entrance of the drive at Rest Point Road to determine a need to trim bark on e.xisting dense vegetation for the purpose of improving sight lines at the intersection. Authorities granted by this variance run with the propeny not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the d,ite of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of August, 1995. ATTESt: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owneits) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the Citv of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the CiW. Notary Public Pace 4 of 5 W' » 1 -rW“ li—rvC'lL*. • imra ftcA-«-k "XI -.Tf.* k- b STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tlie foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this dav of ,199 . before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. N’otarv' Public Paste 5 of 5 L:^'’ Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator 3 From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Date:July 5, 1995 Subject: ^032 Michael and Lynne Gerlicher. 1375 Rest Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Approximate lot area = 30,634 s.f. or .70 acres Pntinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - Non-encroachment - allowed height. Allowed = 3’ 6" (fences at 3'/i’ or lower are considered non-encroachments and may be placed along any lot line) Proposed = 7’ (posts are 7’, average height of fence 6’ to 6Vi’, 5'/i’ at center of section) Average height = 6-6'/i’ Variance = 3'/i’ or 100% Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) - Required setback for structures from rear/street lot line. Required = 30’ Proposed = 0’ Variance = 30’ or 100% Section 10.03. Subdivision 15 (D) - "... No fence or wall over 42" but not in excess of 72" in height above original grade may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots and shall not be constructed within 75’ of the shoreline." Review Exhibits D and F. The 6’ fence recently reinstalled on side lot line does not encroach 75’ setback nor does it impact lakeshore views of the residence to immediate south. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G Application Plat Map Property Owners* List Survey Elevation of Fencing Staff Sketch-Average Lakeshore Setback Topographic Map - -w.’. A tlah Q*^ Zoning File #2032 July 5, 1995 Page 2 Descriptioo of Request Applicani seeks approval of a height and setback variance for a 6 + privacy fence located at the street lot line and in the rear yard of a lakeshore lot that does not abut a major thoroughfare. Rest Point Road is not a County road nor an MSA funded road. As lence exceeds the allowed 3W height, the Code will require that it meet the strucniral setback of 30 . Review Exhibit D. Applicant has designated the areas requiring variance approval, an 80 section along the street lot line and 30’ along the south side lot line. Posts have already been installed. The Inspector asked the applicant to cease all work until »iie necessary variance approvals were received. The existing sections along the street and rear yard along alley are at the allowed 42 height. Applicant has reinstalled fencing along the side lot line uhere a previous fence had existed for some 18 years. Applicant chose not to repair sections but to replace with berer quality fencing. This type of fencing is similar to the fencing installed at the residence across the street on Rest Point Road. Note reference to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (D) - fencing along side lot line on a lakeshore lot cannot exceed 72" or 6’ height. As average height of this fence is 6’ + , applicant must also seek variance for portion of fence installed along side lot line. If fence is to exceed 6’ in height, the Code asks that the fence be reinstalled 10 from the side lot line. Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit A. They are as follows: 1. Original privacy fencing had existed on property for over 18 years. 2. Applicant ’s desire for privacy due to Ix'.cation of the residence to roadway at south and public alley to the east. 3.Sloping topography adjacent to Rest Point Road places both road and house at the same elevation. 4. Need to minimize car lights, etc. from nearby driveways and roadway. Issues for Consideration 1. Are applicant ’s hardships valid or acceptable? 2. Does the unique layout of this neighborhood require special screening needs year-round? 3. Does the fence visually impact any adjacent property? 4. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. I Zoning File #2032 July 5, 1995 Page 3 Options of Action To either aR>rove, amend or deny the height and setback variance application for privacy fencing within the rear yard and at the street lot line of the property located at 1375 Rest Point Road. Any recommendation of approval must iiKlude the condition that applicant obtain a building permit for construction of privacy fencing within street and side yard. Isv s/r .'—.T—. .ii^ Jt' .I- « ’*r*» CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPITCATION ^II Initial Application Fee S200.00 3^m ^' ($50.00 per each additional varianyy^ Renewal Variance Fee $100.(X) (no change from original appi’cation) Variance for non-confonning structures $200.00 After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION /f ^ /j ^ l/ Site Address /^7T <£■'—VL rrrv r*r nor^kji) will W‘I W‘«Ni.‘ltUcTijAvrr neerreI wi I iww C’j ca/ £ .‘£l.V . fi. /V • rOv. RECEiPT-T^m’ YQLi jjTTQfVf^-V Mf T< f^w’w’WVlV WWil iTvi ll OA/1 Propert}’ Identification Number (P.I.D.) 07//7 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Propert) Acquired /9.f:^ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X- residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: j di 3 ?>:)_______________ (montiv'year) APPLICANT Name L<vV<-^ Address: IA7<; i^f-.rr ---------- OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name -4- ^ --------- Address:___________ _____________ City: Phone (home) 47;, ^•iTS' Phone(work)___ Zip:_^X2iiy. Phondhome) Phone (work) City:7;‘Pv description of reqltst Estimated Construction Cost S TatSch ad VARIANCES REQLTREL Lot Area _Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) ive. lUtP.f-cjSisiJ fifSzi- ^ ' y -Tl.. O.V/i^vVY) .i^v e ery m*'5rV(>i *' Jf REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AM of the follnwing information must be submitt ed bv application de^idline date in or<3er tnf vmir application to t>g considered complete? Completed Application Form . 77 Cenified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtam this list from ■Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Govt Center, 34S-3271). -................. ' -------------owners list). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ✓ Hennepin County Department ot Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). , . , , ^ ^ T/ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/: x 11 for Top'^Shic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade Tn nrovide one (1) copy S'/:” x 11" for reproduction. 6. 7. 8. 9. loposrapnic survey auu^ ^ — ““^re proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/:" x 11" for reproduction. V'^ketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8*/i x 11 ). List of the legal names (include marital status) ot all persons with an interest in the propertv. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current ownens). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff The Applicant and Propertv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour varinnee aDPlicnfinn not' complete if the above information not beep include d. APPLICANT S SIGNATLTIE u 7 Tl>e applicant herebv acrees to provide all intbrmation required or requested by the Zonmg Admto^ator. agrees m pay additiorul fees (staff time no' vivered by original fee payment) jrtetTTn review of this application, and cenifies that the supplied is true^and C^eci to^dfe l)cst,i>f his/her knowledge. .Applicant’s Signatur^^^^^i^il^i^' (Date 7/r^ / OWTVER’S SIGNATL'RE ^ , The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further auUionzes reasonable entry' onto the property by City itatf, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of invesOgation ai^er^ca^n of this request. Owner's Signature of this request Date T Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission aiid Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 r ’ yryx mm UTf M/iuwTumefn * . « - J TAwmi IHMI/AMi AOM . flMNm NAM * TAMAYtA NAM/AOM a»tCN NAM ' TAXPAYER ‘NAM/AOOR ADOR OWCR.NAM TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR M fiNNElm COUNTY PROPERTY XNRMHAnON SYSTEM MOPCRTY OWERS LISTSO RT-ll7-tS St tORt RIMR fltST PODir LA J N NOUTWAW • R J NOUTMAN J N NDU TNAN t R J HOmNAH KHWT LA SSSAA Si tr-iir-ts St oosi •XB7S REST POINT RO K 1 ANDERSON I A R RRAKR KIRR ANDERSON 1S7S REST POINT RO m B5SA4 ; • *• t. #* I ' ' *T • % % Si D7-117-tS St M«1 01S7I REST POINT U KENNITN N A RENEE 0 EOGERT KENMTH N I RENEE 0 EGGERT 1S71 REST POINT LA HOUND m SSS44 Si 07-117-2S SS 0007 OISM REST POINT RO N A V RRAKE JR NALTER 7 A VAUGMN 0 KRAKE ISM REST POINT RO HOUND m SS3A4 SO 07-117-23 33 0011 01305 REST POINT RO SUZAMC R AUSTIN SUZATtC AUSTIN 229 OAKNOOO RO HQPKIM HN 65393 Si 07-117-tS St 0039 01S95 REST POINT RO R N SI6AF00S ETAL RALPH A CORA SIOAFOOi 1345 REST POINT RO NOUe tot 55S49 30 07-117-tS St OOSO 01350 REST POINT RO* LAS CRADILL LARRY A SHARON OIABILL 1350 REST POINT RO tS»9 ttt 55349 30 07-117-23 33 0005 01394 REST POINT RO PAN NALSN PATRICK J HALSH 1390 REST POINT RO m 55349 30 07-117-23 33 0009 01395 REST POINT RO ROOERT 0 OREOESON ROBERT 6 OREOESON 15 E ST ALBANS RO HOPKINS ttt 55305 30 07-117-23 33 0012 01379 REST POINT RO 6 R BLOOM A r A BLOOM GEORGE R A THERESA A BLOOM 1579 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55349 REPORT NO. PZ9SIM1 PA» 4SO 07-117-tS St 0037 01375 REST POINT RO N 0 A L K CCRLICMR MICHAEL 0 A LYtttE MRUCHER 1375 REST POINT RO ttl 55349 SO 07-117-23 32 0040 01344 REST POINT RO LAMRENCE E A HELEN LANGHANS LAMRENCE E A HELEN LANGHANS 1344 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55349 30 07-117-23 33 0004 01304 REST POINT RO nRRV C SMITH ETAL TERRY C SMITH 1304 REST POINT RO HOUND ttl 55349 ' SO 07-117-23 S3 0010 01905 REST POINT RO HENOY H OLSON NENOV H OLSON 1905 REST POINT RO MOUND ttt 55349 ■ •. TOTAL BATCH 509 00019 M * \ • V' V • ♦ ;• m I r- ■ r ’ -v . '•' rij- ■ f• . . ^ J S PS. f I 0 Cl'f'] “2.S - / Plat of Surroy for 1. ?lac*r In Suodl^laloii of U>t Ii*| Host Point Park Hocnapin Cocnty, Wnnooota Juis m * • '”1V* ^icnoFiim 'V4a i V Cartificata of Surrey* I hereby certify that this is a tixa and correct representation of a stcrey of the boundaries of: All of Lota 15, 22, and 23» and all that part of Lota 16, 17, and 21 wnlch lie South of a lli» drawn from .--jSk;. ,'’r 1 the Southwest comer of said l^t 21 to a point in the c>aat Una of ^la I^t 1 , and which point is situate 1 foot South fmn tr.e Northeast comer of together with ar./ eacatod alloy which lies between the lota herein coscrited, a 11 In the Subdlrlslon of Lot XJ*. Rest Point Park, Lajte Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the folic wing-deacribod aU that part of Lots 15 and 22 and adjacent racated alley, Suboirlalon of ^t U, Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minneaota, lying Southerly of the followinr-described llr^* Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1*; distant 75 foot Northeasterly froa the Southeasterly comer oi saia Lot 23; thence Northweetorly to the South-easterly comer of said lot 22; thence Northweeterly on a line forsdng an angle of 74°55' with the Easterly line said Lot 22, to the snore of Lake Minr.etonka, ana there ennlng, and the location of all existing buildings thereon, am prcpoaed location of a proposea addi tion It dees net purport to sh^jw othrr Inprcveoents or encroachcenta. Fbr pur-^ses of this aurvey an iron Barker on the Northerly line of said ?? distant U2.3 feet Westerly from the Northeasterly comer of said Lot 22 has been aaausEd to be "the Southwest comer of said mentioned^ th^ lejel description. Scale* I” = 50* Ctordon R. Coffin Reg^fio. 6064 Date • 10-27-77 Surreyor and Planner o Ircn’marker- Ix>ng Lake, Minneeota ^ V t U mm a jiiliil 'yjjj'i !i ^ I ! I I I 1 liii * • i' • ;:ni: Hit ; > ' 5 -t ^ iniiiii'"' ^oumw Vjp^TATE ■*^ -^ < I X ___I •. •.' s • , *• . \ i ■ i ■. •'.■ * . ;■ r rsi -jf-^ .. *. Plat of Survey fcr ilrer C. Harter cr,partvof Sutdlv^iricn cf Let 14, Hast Peirt Park J Eimriplr. County, ^ttnne^ota i . _ ^ " «■ • - . «» • - **a •• 21• V •• • ** a • , A:f i» Mt #•« l»t liM# rr r . Certificate of Curvey: I h®r®by certify that t?iie is c true ar.d correct r**yrcsentatior. of a survey of the hour.darles cf; a / lot 23, and. all t) at port of Lota 15 «r.d 22, and adjacent vacated alley, .•Sub^vlslcn cf Lot !/., Point Trjr/., La ’:« Mrr.etcnka, lylr.r Southerly of the fcllowlng- 'deeorlbed line: ’.-"rirnlrr at a roint on thr* Scuth"rct=rly* Hr® cf said'Lot It, distant 75 feet •JIorth''nrtr'rl:- th^* Centh^.-irt-rl" cc-r.-r of fpic Lot 23; th®r.c“ hcrthwesterly to 'the Southeast cr'lv ccrrrr rf -aid Lot 22; thv.r» ’:crtb;«cterl’' or. i lino fornlnt' an angle of 74®55' vlth the A-n"rl- lln- -aid Hit 22, to t! - -her® of I/'ke J-tlr.netcnka, and there ending; and B/ All of Lots- 15, 22, t r.i 23, ai.d all th ut cf Lctr> 1^, 17, and 21, utlch lies South of a llr.^: orawr ''rjr th® CouThvest corner cf -aid Let 21 to a roint In the East line of said lot lo, v/; "-;-' -oJrt j- 5ltu?t®d or.® foot Couth cf the Lortheast corner of said Lot ^6A^oc«th<7r.^6Aatp««th<rr. Vir.h .n?- whxc ->> Xi.e. lotn ner-ir. c-rcrat>ec, ai.l “Doli«f .iB.SSbdlylslcn o^ Jc\ :->K-®er. (1/) he-t Pclrt Far/, T/k® Kinr.etcr.ki , ®xce-t that part thereof lyir*r Louti>®rly of th® fcnovlnF-.-iescrlbec line: E®rjr.nlrc- ^t a point on the South -eaeterly line of Ec Io lot 15, clst'-rr 75 f.crtheasterl ’* brr - the Scuthea5iterl7 corner of said lot .3; th®nr- :.crrhv®rte-]y to the Ccutheerterlv corner of sold Let 22; thence ^rthvesterly on a lir® for.T.lr.F an erfl® of 74=55' with the Easterly lin- of said Lot 22. to the shorn of I'inr^'-onka, ar.d th^re nndir^. It dees not pin-rort to shew imrrov®rents or ®ncroochrer,ts, if any. It U understood ana agree- no ncr.u.T^nts nave c®ea placed by us fcr th-» purpose of en^blishlnp-lot lines or Doundary corners. V J • t P'-*- ^ose 01 ecL^Li-isniDP^l( • i^‘?lley, Jr. /Pep. Pc Scale :(Tr •*4 i 50'^ ' Eruce R. /Celley Gordon R. Coffin 1342 Reg. lio. 5713 R rf • No. 6064 e : Mar ch 6, ] 9c 1 .;:,‘i,,; ^ 5^ 3 JF : Iron r.arkor found KELLEY & KELLEY, Engineers S: Surveyors Long I^ke, Minnesota :-V . .fi *I- N . ^ «> V-J 5> .•4-*-‘ • # * f _ r ‘ft/ gp r^ -\^ f •iciii i --------it c ir I £lUL 1 'S ---------♦* 1996 r /•// /Uy 2 C^y>i c/:^ 4 ^y — ) > 1 h ------T-- 1' i.. Ti t- ”^r <K</^s/ cr y ^-e 7^ S'A^ /^ ^ ^ye^licl^^ --------- ^ Ax^CtcJi, ’T^ci^ ^/c/^41^ce /T'^^ C4H c/c^ - / / '~M^^ /wc_ df>4/trc.o2lc/» 7?^»^ ..... "T^vn) p/p^ /^-:%.ao vTtPj «r-€^Ki^-X ”zJ“ ^yi ------- A^trC Xz-^ c/ y/.. -y'// 7^ !^ZS<!'>r-t . iSn2s/*fce 2l^JJ' 7r 7^ 71^—3. rfctZ. ~t7 (/z>^ce z*-*^ cy't^ atsl-*,^^ (7^7^ ^ ^4, 7^ Ai?^^ 4 T^^'VA-f 7/^Ay7 aj ,/S^C^'y^ 7:^ ____________ .-il.. ^ C^c^i^JlsL <?r4-^nyv id^yJt ^ ■ / y ..... Aj^^ yon /^ ^ __\r4dl^ 7^ O^ • _ ^ g/ ^ >v^ o ^ 2r /^ jervxL^y^ ^ r^ __ 'lii// ^,0C^c/V dJ^k-C r // yCv_ c/ JVWW'/'^^W, y\rvy^ /(Y ^ ^^/"»—I# •^— % /7^ 6^ /(^ ^ 7^ 'ii fc4^flc^ y^ cAdyuLS^.^t l^/(/hry^Ac,S (fl^^cfl - ••• 7-^’ <5irc4/^ ^ . ,3^ T^JP^^oTTo^/ ^2»^ ^ ^ JfWyv-^n^/v> m aO «i»X W WVlW «l ricii*el and I^/ana Jerlicnar 2:' 137d Hast Point Rd,, Crono, T.'n. plan to R2?I-vC2 an 2XI3TIJ3 six foot hii^i privnc/ stocinde-type fence on tde east and soutii side of tiieir property ’.vita a 3ETTZH quality, pro- fesflionally built on site, privacy fence of 3are or lesser ncis-tt. Tliis reclacenent fenca will be the alternating jcard iype (red cedar}, finished on aOTH sides and identical to tne attractive fence installed atl374 Rest Point Rd.(George L Tcri Blocc), As an interested nei:i^hbor v.'nose property lies .vithin 150’ of the 1375 Heot Point property,*! would have ao objection to this rropooed re- placenent/improver.ent. /ST)I mi ■L n-j^esT I f\D 0 o f{cti tT /j;5 r-j id'sT- 1350 ^ / f' 1^ od0_ )^!o t)x^ I^<?3" /I e^-r^^‘u~ I 3 (,r iJi P*> - -4- ' 4- . ' ■ <*' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '■■V v'V V 9 DATE: August 7. 199l(o % •* ITEM NO.: -V ^Department Approval: NaoM Jeanne A. Mabusth Titk Building St Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2033 Donald and Arlene Kielley, 1670 Shady wood Road - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC Total lot area = 14,500 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Amended Per Planning Commission Recommendation Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Revi^-w of hardcover. A. 0-75 ’ setback area = 4.680 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 383 s.f. or 8.l8fc Proposed = 158 s.f. or 3.38% Reduction in Hardcover = 225 s.f. or 4.8% B.75-250 ’ setback area = 9,820 s.f. Allowed = 2,455 s.f. or 25% Existing = 5.073 s.f. or 51.6% Original proposal = 5,184.5 s.f. or 52.8% (hardcover increase of 111.5 s.f. or 1.14%) Amended Proposal = 4,409 s.f. or 44.8% Hardcover reduction = 664 s.f. or 6.8%* Variance = 1,954 s.f. or 19.9% ♦Add 505 s.f. addition + covered deck 150 s.f. new walkway pavement To be removed 866 s.f. plastic underiiner 280 s.f. pavement 23 s.f. railroad ties Request for Council Action continual page 2 of 3 August 7, 1995 Zoning File #2033 Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Total lot area = 14,500 s.f. Allowed = 2,175 s.f. or 15 Existing = 2,263 s.f. or 15.6% Proposed *= 2,768 s.f. or 19% Increase in structural coverage - 505 s.f. or 3.4% Lot coverage variance = 593 s.f. or 4% Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Side yard setback variance Required = 10’ Existing = 8 inches Proposed = 6’ Variance for addition = 4 ’ or 40% (existing variance 9'4 inches or 94%) Brief Description of Request Please refer to the enclosed staff memo of July 10, 1995 and the minutes of the July 17 Planning Commission meeting for more detail and background on this review. The application involves a request to construct a 10.5’x42.5’ addition to the street side ot the existinu residence. The structure will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. The addition will be located 6’ from the north side lot line where the existing structure is located at 8". There will be an increase of 505 s.l. or 3.4% of strucmral coverage where coverage exists at 15.6% and is proposed at 19%. The improvement will require a 593 s.f. or 4% lot coverage variance (existing variance = 88 s.f. or 0.6%). Tlie applicants propose a 225 s.f. or 4.8% reduction in hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area resulting from the removal of plastic underliner beneath a rock landscape area, refer to Exhibit L. Per the Planning Commission recommendation the applicants have been asked to remove all plastic underliners on property resulting in a reduction ot some 866 s.f. of hardcover. Planning Commission also asks for an additional 98 s.f. of pavement located between the two detached garases that were to be originally removed in an earlier 1982 variance application. No other hardcover removals were required. Final hardcover has been reduced by 664 s.f. or 6.8% as shown above in the hardcover inventor}'. The Planning Commission ’s recommendation specifically asks that the area in between the garages currently occupied by a rock landscape area underlain with plastic and pavement be replaced with grass. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 August 7, 1995 Zoning File #2033 The applicants advised of the need for additional storage areas within garage as the existing residence structure has no basement. Applicants noted a possible need to maintain plastic along north side of residence to keep drainage or runoff going into a partial basement in lower level. Planning Commission advised that this could be achieved with regrading directing drainage away from house and with the installation of gutters. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application subject to hardcover reductions being made as set forth above. Applicants were advised that it structural improve!.'^nts were proposed at some future time that approval will be conditioned on applicants oficring matching or greater removal of existing strucniral improvements. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission's recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTSTED: To deny, adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) nUE #2033 WHEREAS, Don, ,d R. Kielley and Arlene Kielley (hereinafter "the applicants") arc owners of the property located at 1670 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: The South 2’ of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8. Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C); 10.22. Subdivision 2; and 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a 10.5’x42.5’ addition to the street side of the existing residence to be placed 6’ from the north side lot line where a 10’ setback is required and where the existing structure is located 8" from the lot line. The improvement will result in a structural coverage excess of 593 s.f. or 4% for a total of 19% coverage where 15% is allowed and 15.6% exists and a hardcover variance of 1,954 s.f. or 19.9% with total hardcover of 4,409 s.f. or 44.8% where 25% is allowed and 51.6% exists. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 1 This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2033. The property is located in the LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. The property consists of 14,500 s.f. or .33 acres. Page 1 of 6 syhUiiaiiaiuBBiiiiia [ 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17, 1995, and recommended approval of the variances as amcreled based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Limitations on the lot area and w idth of property cannot be remedied because there is no adjacent undeveloped lands available tor combination. B. luxation of home on adjacent property to the north will minimize any impact of the substandard side setback. C. Majority of the lot except for the last 20’ adjacent to the shoreline is flat. There arc extensive grassed areas to allow for drainage to run over lawn areas before entering take. D. 505 s.f. of new structure will be offset by being placed over approximately 189.5 s.f. of existing pavement and landscape areas underlain with plastic. E. The residence structure has no basement area. The two detached garages on the property’ are also used for residential storage. F. In 1982, the City granted setback and hardcover variances for the second garage on the property. G. The property is served by municipal sewer and water. H. The proposed improvement will result in a reduction of hardcover within the 0-73’ setback area at 225 s.f. or 4.8% and in the 75-250’ setback area there is a reduction of 664 s.f. or 6.8%. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that cranting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propeny; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to all viate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property Pace 2 of 6 right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Plaruiing Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variaiKe on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above to permit construction of a 10.5 ’x42.5* addition to the street side of the existing residence, grants a lot coverage variance of 593 s.f. or 4%, a side yard setback variance of 4’ or 40% and hardcover variance ot 1,954 s.f. or 19.9%, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All hardcover improvements scheduled for removal and as shown on Page 6 of this resolution shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for new' construction. The area between the detached garages shall be cleared of all hardcover improvements and replanted with grass or other suitable ground cover. 3.Applicants and future owners are placed on notice that any fumre requests for structural additions to the residence, accessory stnicnires or additions to existing accessory structures may be approved only with matching or greater removals of existing structural improvements on the property. 4.Authorities granted by this variance run with the propeny not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14, 1996). 5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Paec 3 of 6 ► ^ h 6.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors aral assigns, herebv agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of August. 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mavor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 1995. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said iiLstrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv Ihiblic Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared________________________________^------------—- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Pace 5 of 6 TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:July 10. 1995 SUBJECT: #2033 Donald and Arlene Kielley, 1670 Shadywood Road - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage Total lot area = 14,500 s.f. Allowed = 2,175 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,263 s.f. or 15.6% Proposed = 2,768 s.f. or 19% Increase in structural coverage = 505 s.f. or 3.4% Lot coverage variance = 593 s.f. or 4% Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. A. 0-75’ setback area = 4,680 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 383 s.f. or 8.18% Proposed = 158 s.f. or 3.38% Reduction in Hardcover = 225 s.f. or 4.8% B.75-250’ setback area = 9,820 s.f. Allowed = 2,455 s.f. or 25% Existing = 4,907 + 166 s.f. (rock with plastic not credited in hardcover inventory) = 5,073 s.f. or 51.6%, refer to Exhibit L Proposed = 5,184.5 s.f. or 52.8% Hardcover increase = 111.5 s.f. or 1.14% Variance = 2,729.5 s.f. or 27.8% (existing variance = 2,618 s.f. or 26.7%) Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Side yard setback Required = 10’ Existing = 8 inches Proposed = 6’ Variance for addition = 4’ or 40% (existing = 9’4 inches or 94%) r Zoning File #2033 July 10. 1995 Pigc2 List of Exhibits A • Application Al- A(klendum B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Hardship Statement E - Street Elevation F - Hardcover Inventory 0-75 ’ Setback Area G - Hardcover Inventory 75-250 ’ Setback Area H - Floor Plan 11-4 - 1982 Variance Review* J - Approved Site Plan for 1982 Review Kl-3 - Request by Applicants to Amend Approved Hardcover Plan of 1982 L - Current Survey Plus Hardcover Plan Review of 1982 Variance Application In 1982 the former owner received approval of a setback 'nd hardcover variances to allow construction of the second 20 ’x24 ’ detached garage on the property. The approval included the allowance for an expansion of a paved area to the east side of an existing concrete slab approximatelv I4 ’x24 ’. In order to minimize hardcover increases resulting from the improvement^, applicant was to remove a 16 ’x3 ’x8.3’ storage shed in the street yard and a section of the original paved walkway that linked the older garage to the residence that would be located between the existing and proposed garage, refer to Exhibits 11-4 and J. the approved site plan. In 1985 the applicant sought to amend the original approved hardcover plan asking for both the shed and concrete pavement between garage structures in lieu of not installing 14 ’x24 ’ expanded turnaround area. Applicant was advised to file a new variance application, review Exhibits Kl- 3. The applicant never filed a variance application to amend the hardcover improvements on the property. Review of Current Hardcover Refer to Exhibit L note the shed has been removed. Instead of installing an expanded turnaround 'area, applicant has maintained the concrete walkway between the two detached structures Note a 126 s.f. of rock with plastic has been added to this area in addition to a triancular shaped rocK with plastic area at 40 s.f. just to the east of the new garage. A 13 ’x23 ’ blacktop area has been added to the south of the existing concrete slab resulting in 299 s.t. ol additional hardcover. As already noted above, staff has adjusted hardcover facts to reflect the 166 s.f. of additional hardcover. Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area exists at 5,073 s.f. or 51.6%. Zoning FQc 02033 July 10. 1995 Page 3 Dneription of Current Requ^ Applicant proposes an approximate 10.5'x42.5‘ addition to the street side of the existing residence. Refer to Exhibit L. the struemre will be located approximately 6’ from the nonh side lot line. There is no encroachment of an average lakeshore setback. The structure is completely located in the 75-250’ setback area where excesses of hardcover exist. There will an increase of 111.5 s.f. or 1.14% hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area. The new addition will result in a more intense lot coverage variance. Structural coverage exists at 15.6% now proposed at 19.7% resulting in an increase of structural coverage of 3.4%. Applicant proposes the removal of landscape areas underlain with plastic in the 0-75 setback area and within the 75’-250’ setback area the removal of paved walkways and railroad ties as shown on Exhibit L. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit D. applicant notes the following; 1. 2. Limitations on the area and wi tth of lot cannot be remedied because there is no adjacent undeveloped lands available for combination. Location of home on adjacent property to north will minimize any impact of the substandard side setback. Majority of the lot except for the last 20’ adjacent to shoreline are flat. There are extensive grass areas to allow for drainage to run over lawn areas before entering lake. Some 505 s.f. of nc\v ’ structure is offset by being placed over 189.5 s.f. of existing nonstructural hardcover. Residence structure has no basement. Accessory structures are also used for residential storage. The proposed improvements will result in a total hardcover reduction on the property of 113.5 s.f. or 0.8%. Zoning File #2033 July 10, 1995 Page 4 Issues for Consideration 1 2. I- i: Hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area is proposed at 5,184.5 s.f. or 52.85d. What other hardcover improvements can be or should be removed? a) 13’x23* blacktopp^ area to south of concrete pad at 299 s.f. or 3.04%? b) 126 s.f. or 1.3% of plastic underlincr beneath crushed rix:k betveen detached garage. 98 s.f. or 1.0% concrete pavement between detached garages. 540 s.f. ± or 5.5% of plastic liner beneath landscape areas/crushed rock c) d) areas. Will members approve a 3.4% increase in structural coverage ... 4% final variance? 3. Hardcover in the 0-75’ setback area has been decreased by 225 s.f. or 4.8%. Total hardcover on the property has been reduced 113.5 s.f. or 0.08%. 4. Other issues raised by Plaiming Commission. Options of Action To deny, approve or amend variance application seeking approval of structural coverage, hardcover excesses within the 75-250 setback area and side setback variances for property located at 1670 Shady wood Road. Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new approved construction. F CITY OF OROXO - VARUNCE APPLICATION ^ ^ Initial Application Fee S200.00 ' ($50.00 per each additional variance) / / Renewal Variance Fee S 100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) «n CITY CF FI^A^E OFFICE 1 • Vt/VV'^b. wVvva C‘£T.\ vl OEH PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ Site Address 4^ V • h n1 u V* %j-‘Crrt0 T«. y rx ^i\k.w^ai f r t w‘V #770ri:,T'^wwwvw’W' wVva iTva iv f » ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D^d_______________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (^ (do net) also own the^jaceni parcels of land. Present use of property: ^ ^residential. -----other (specify) Zoning Disaict: APPLICANT Phone (.home) ^7/le) *^// ; ---- Phone(work)_^^2i^IcL2;o Address; 7^City: -----Zip: r-n^ OWNER (if different than applicant) / Name /yaJjA/^ A Address: y^/F'PQ y^a/. Phonethome) Phone (work) City: -------Zip:_^^2Z? DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:____ Estimated Construction Cost S Py'ooo . I SA^o.J:------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQLTRED Lot Area _Lot Width Setback:Front Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify-) HARDSHIP/DESCKJPTION of LINX'SUAL PROPERTY'^ CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusiK.; property conditions preventms compliance with Zoning Code requirements: —^----------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________________________—------------------------------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) L 4HM» 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Ail of the following infonngtioti must be submitted bv the WPliMt»Qn deadline dat^ \n ord^T for your application to bg considered cotnplftg; i/yompleied Application Form “^enifiecl Propcrtv Owners List of ow ners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Htnncpm County Department of Finance. A-603. Gou Center, 348*3271). ^"'rlat Map (obtained with propcrt>’ owners list). "x^Cemficate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur\eyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ‘A x 11 for reproduction. .... Topographic surv ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade \ire proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy x IT for reproduction.^ >/Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 ‘/2' x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) it not current owner(s). __As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by Cit>‘ staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The Applicant and Propenv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that y2U£ variance ^*u.n k m>t fomplete if the above inform ation has not been jncliLdcd, APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE u 7 • The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tme not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s Signature / O A'NER’S SIGNATURE u . ki The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes rea.sonaDie entry onto the p.operty by CUy staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purpos^of investisaiion artd verification of this request. Owner ’s Siannmre f LLL.'Lll I-----Date —h [J_ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday ot each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 V ■< « • jy •V A* A-'i PROJECT SUMMARY - -1670 SHADYWOOO ROAD SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is located on the west shore of Crystal Bay. The lot is long and narrow and generally flat from the street to a point approximately 20' from the shoreline whe a it falls rapidly to the water. The lot area is 14,500 SF. small by any standards except in the core city The existing housr was probably built as a cabin in the 20's or 30's. Though it has been remor^eled and upgraded several times throughout the years, it remains small. Without a basement, all mechanical services (HVAC, laundry, etc.) are 'jcated on the main floor further limiting space for living Existing garages ar«? located near the street. The walk to the front door is something over 70’, a dist ince that seems longer while carrying groceries in the rain or snow. PROPOSAL The homeowners desire increased family .iving space. The proposal Is for the addition of of approximately 273 SF of enclosed space combined with interior revisions to accomooate a Family Room, Laundry and Half Bath while providing a contemporary Kitchen and much needed storage space An additional 232 SF of covered Deck is also proposed to provide shelter at the front door and a modest area for outdoor enjoyment. The covered Deck gives architectural interest and enhances the "cottage charm." The proposed space is to be built streetside. encroaching no closer to the lake. The proposal requires the granting of two variances; one, a skJeyard setback variance to acknowledge an existing condition of the house too close to the North property line and a second for hardcover in the 75’-250' zone. 4GOVT LOT 2 ✓...L.. 1 •1 1 .J M « • • • <f** ^ ' ! *1 '4 "i'*!'» 1 i*® .:i r ! ' i» , 1 ’ 1''^ »I 1 ^43)J!X) !( 1 ! 1 1 -ai !90! -:i-l -57 • -0 JSJ-aj_ J:Ti ‘2w LOT 2 i' - 0 ? I •M i - j-* N S t 1 » MO 1823 n-in-zr=TZ 'i (•:; I' J |i T. • 1 II - r j] •C9T r (35 'sHjT (n .iH mi El o) ^ ci! 8 chTi" l4)■|n/j-- 1 4 f 'Tjj. :j ■ ~ 1 \ ^ . m \ Q r\ ^ (5)A? /7 )I7-23'2| '>1^/ jfe 93 » <05 (25)^; m 4» 4}=- i jul’ *<=1 X L S 9!0 1313 >Vr > , ' 'j. 9 MTn •••M 17-U7-XS. 71 •UTt MMVMOOO n MCmii • MDNUH • MXFf' TttPmttmm/m^ V• •-. ' . i.%9tt» MM’■ *t TAMAVIII ■ NMC/MM yH * 4 . AOM* mmn mm TAXFAYfi WM/AOCNI mmiA m sunM l7-U7-tS tl MIS SUM SNMVMM M S II nOtLOra ETAL K N MELOrS USQ ssAsvNcm n MYZATA lf« BSlfl M 17-117-ES El M17 •liM StIAOYHOOO U JACK F mOM JACK r SNOM UM SHAOVNOOO M MAmTA m S5S9X • 5r-\C ♦ *Vii"r7 .1 MM AOM (MCt NAtC TAXPAYER NAHE/AMi fOTAL BATCH SM BOMS ^ W!*.. •• > •. •¥ I VJr \ r ^ #- #. .* ^ f.%■' •/• . ♦ , . i ' ' v il V ■l - " i A r1}.‘ • 1. - '“■'Vi •' * - '■ ’ t • •' « * ‘ •. 4f. i « f,- d . ‘k . 1 * .. f ' •>% % • > ‘ V. ■« \ • w ' t' ■ t .s:< . •V iPV COUMTY PMPiRTY XMEWhATION $YSTf|f MQKRTY CMCRS LISTM 17-117-ES El BOOS 01719 FAfiERNESS PQIKr fill LAUOEEN E OARLINQ LAUHEN E OARiXMO 1719 FAOERNESS POIKT 00 MAYZATA ffl SU91SO I7-117>ES El MIB 01470 SHAOYMOOO 00 OGNAiO 0 RIELLEY DONALD 0 RIlLLiY 1470 SHAOYNOOO M laYEATA m S5S91 «#OEPOOT NO. PAS PI4SS401IE SO 17-117-ES El MIO 01710 SHAOYNOOO RO JOHN P FITZPATRICK JOHN P FITZPATRICK 1710 SHAOYNOOO 00 HAYZATA HN SSI91 SO 17-117-7S El MIS 01440 SHA0\W00 00 0 T FINN ETAt GERUO T FINN 1440 SHAOYNOOO 00 NAYZATA 194 SS191sa 17-117-ES El Mli 014M SHAOYNOOO m JONN 0 DOLEHAN ETAL JOHN 0 DOLEHAN 1400 SHAOYNOOO ROAD NAYZATA HN 55591 SO 17-117-ES EE MIS 01445 SHAOYNOOO M RALPH HARVEY ETAL RALPH HARVEY 1445 SHAOYNOOO RO NAYZATA MN 55191 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF NY KNQNLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^•7-D5„-DATE * im ■ ^ *' . ^ . N* HARDSHIP: The hardship to justify the granting of these variances comes from the small size of this lot that is located on the lake and thereby affected by the nwe stringent requirements for setbacks and hardcover. The current proposal is an attempt to address those concerns. The proposal adds approxinwtely 505 SF floorspace but because much of it is built over existing hartcover, the net increase in hardcover is only 247 SF Revision of the existing sidewalk to serve the new entry location and removal of the unused portions results in a decrease of 104 SF. Additionally, the homeowner is willing to eliminate the landscape hardcover (rock and poly) in the 0’-75’ zone on the lakeside of the home for a further reduction in hardcover of 225 SF. The result of this proposal Is a net decrease in total hardcover of 114 SF The hardships caused by extremely small sites in close proximity to the water are an ongoing problem in this community. We believe this proposal serves the concerns of everyone, providing additional space, comfort and value for the homeowner that yields a net decrease in hardcover to the environment and the City of Orono. f CT5u c^, O Q t f w. .i K^tLUr hardcover calculation worksheet RCLE ONE) \ A. House r. MARPCOvn IN ZONE lifiZ Wkiiii I X B. Cmte C. Orivcwiy X X D. Sidewalk Y X X • • E. Patlo/Deck s X TT7^ F. Uodsopc Uoccrlam By Plastic X X X tt. * C. Otter TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A —,X 100 - FpnposF.p hardcqvf .R IN ZQN.E A. House »• — ------- « •««» Uflxta WWii X X X B. Gar age C. Dnveway X X D. Sidewalk X X 25-500'500-1 00(r • /Z V • • • _S.P. S.F. •S.F. m •_S.F. m •-S.F. m S.F. m -S.F. m IS S.F. m Is F. " m S.F. m _S.F. a m . 97 S S.F. m 1 S.F. m -S.F. • __S.F. • »••• S.F. */6 S.F.CD% • • • • IS _^S.F. % »S.F. S.F. _S.F. a.1 __S.F. - • ^ _S.F. __S.F. zr __S.F. A B S.F. E. Patio/Deck X X S.F, S.F, F. Landscape VJadeilain By Plastic X X X — o S.F• ---------- S.F. ■ S.F. S.F. G. Otter total hardcover in ZONE ^ • TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ ▲ ~ /^r X lOp - S.F. _S.F. A B L BjURDCOYEFT CALCULATION WORKSHEET- SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7S*O^2S0*J 25-500'500-1000'\ gyiSTTNC HARBCOVllt IN ZONE A- House ^ ./;? UafA yz /3.S *£lJ. s X k Z*rT /^y- 5~. */5 /. ^5" B. Carafe 2Y.:^2^. ^ zy. 2 C. Drivewiy rsuc , ft Jif 2^./ % I D. Sidewalk X X •• • . • »iW » E. Paiio/Deck fettle X X r/f7 F. Landscape _ Underlain ^ By Plastic ^ X X X J02.S.F./ J/S S.P. 7y S.F. *7 .S.F^ S.F.^93 3 y O' -5* eT S.F. S.F. V9o S.F. S.F. /S*S.F. S.F. Z 3 1 S.F. ic G. Otter S.F. S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A * Pnnpo?;FD «N ZONE A. House - - «3o-x- Un|ih VI /S > B. Garage ^ • <L* X X X .s^ 2y5 C. Driveway ZV-x- X X D. Sidewalk X •• • •* E, Patio/Deck • X X F. Landscape jReo.‘>x£. Underlain __ By Plastic __ X X X •92 zo S.F. 922 o X 100 »VRi 9 i*% • «• !» A 3^7. S.F. Width zv.*>— IIV • ' % 9/^' S.F. « ">y S.F. ] S.F/y.e y m 7 zn .o z*. 5 \ ' " A — Z 75 S.F. ZO. i iS"^ V-C.F. «S.F. e*; Z 4^0 S.F. ^ a S.F. /y _S.F.. Z3 Z-S.Fv . — o ~ S.F. - S.F. S.F. A B G. Other • I S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . , total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE • .X 100 - S.F. B '-rS^^rftr ?7;V>r. • • r '» HI u~T~ ** *TT**- fTOiPROH: DAW I SUBJECT: OicJc B«nsQn, City Adainlitrator Jeanne A. Itabu.th, zoning Adainistrator Septeaber ®, 1982 M.4 - s^renp. - Zoning District - LR-lc Area - 14,625 sf AppJlMtion . .Id. Mtb.« „d h.rdcov.r v.,i. con.tructlo. pt . „• * 24 e) Side Setback required 10* proposed 3.5* variance 6.5* or 65t b) Hardcover Variance - 75'-250* area 9,975 sf allowed hardcover 2,494 .f or propowd .tfdition.l h.rrtcpv.r .sJJ .( 5, •Breakdown of additional hardcover - 480 sf20 24 X 24 X 14 ?2< it .xp.„ded «ea ^ f*m * . ^ d r- • , # > /e - ¥ W * A v< y A -'•8. V *• «,. ^J''’S16‘^sf. total V •lib ~l«;”bf‘0(4»n«r.t.«^ , .4* ’ a •■ •*»«!* •V'; - *. :; * ■ 9*rage and within liir "•’^^^ucteo garage ' 4b125 .f reddc. 16.3■ x Tot.1 *dditlo„.l H.rdcov„ri'r.V'°“’° List of Exhlb^^« . ^ " Application Exhibit 0 - Plat Map ?: *}-"-! c-*:- =.•: ,0 P. * ' * *^a-‘* .'.a . *U ^ \ < • !► t i*i • 1 ? r. «r ' * pV. • ■ j .. ' , d • ' ' - ; - J1670 shadywood Road Sapteaber 8, 1982 P«9« 2Ravil# of ApplicationS^npa'a original proposal involved a request to attach a 20* X 24* t^-wr. garage to the east of th. existing garage that IncroaJhal 7 into county Road I19*s right of way. Sa?erpa was advilTS^ 5l! CoBBiission tJicix first review *• invvl»ea%>J5oJ ItSIetSJilBodification of a non-conforming structure. At the orellisiAarv appU«t«A ...tin, with s.re.pa, tM appiic«,t C" Pl«.nr., Co««i..ton «otln,, s.renp. .gre.d to «odUy hi. propo.,1. Current :iIlcation 7!l^ proposal is for a detached singlo-stcry gcrace 20* x 24* located 30* off tight of way of County Hoad .19. n!e s» 3 5* froi eh- property lino has been designated for the new oaLo# -pm? ..thick Will .1.0 .now OM o( th, o.t.lin, con?r.M .IS IS STu*.? as turnaround area, staff will require fire w.ii u^d Window opdnin,. fo. th. north the con.tructlon «d no ^rt“e!!“2?di^lSn.!'“^'’* * .tructut. .object to .11 Planning Coareisslon Recommendations To approve the side setback of 3.5* and hardcover variance application «# So?? construction of a 20* X 24* detached^ iinf^- ^ 2. ^Reaoval '7,of concrete ■ walkway between" ext '9R^R90*.. Carage to:be‘Single story, two»n.—i^CwyldWIlSKihfcStf Add-l.-'x iV tt .ki.tli, "iincr.t. - ^ - e - -. V .1 'U ound 1 i I TOe e::isting garage that encroaches County^toed'#lf<'Tlal»t^o£'wew»4 — . l.,.l non-confor.in, .tructut. .„d •ubj.c^.to^,atf4l^«..v;^c.. Applicant is placed on notice that the City wll? ifo™S El • A 4 .* "^ ’d 0 d wn ... • • .• * . ,. ' u * -1^' V •• i.VV.V..a. .V L id r.,v y ’V': A • .k , • *. a ok . \ /•. ' ^ • • -ho. - , .7_u'^A,V '.‘V» ^ ‘rx'kr: ff**# Iine or the orono council. scpTctacR 13. 1982Dutle** aov*d. Burr >«cond«d. to opprov* th« Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 23. 1982* Motion. Ayes (5) - Nays (8).^P« CONMXSSK L.N.c«o..RiMirr comeNTSNo cooaents froa the Park Coaalsslon. No comr'>nts for the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. ptA8miio,;coioixssxo» comments a*' ■ ‘‘'‘No coaaents froa the Planning Coanis3i«;n> N ■*• .-•'l * ' • ■ i vti - * *• I *r PLAUNBIS ♦ . * ¥ . ,'r \ $. RBS0I4ITI0H 1412 'hftttara.* Straa^INLoeatlon • Man ■ ^Hurr aoved. Butler seconded.' to adopt Resolution fll412 regarding Future Street Location Plans In The Navarre Area. Motion. Ayes (5) -Nays (B) • J V.Vi Clarification of Wetlands Basaaants Resoultion #1413 Butler noved. Fraha seconded, to adopt the Resolution 11413 as aeended regarding Clarifi cation of Wetlands Easement Lot 1. Block 1. Pazendln Forest Addition. Motion. Ayes (5) - Nays (0). - 'Vi • > . • A * - — ‘ "VfV • ‘0 *■ POBLIC COMMENTS No comments from the Public. 0vff669 TONKA LAKE PROPERTIES 1340 Baldut Park Road Proliainary Subdivision ^ ^ • U-T •* — :V:^*aH .... ^ . V-rVif. 1694 TBOMAS SARBNPA 1670 Sbadywood Road Varlanea • ' - J V Van Nest moved. Butler ser.«nded. to conceptuallyV ‘.\\v,^i approve the 3 lot plat per ^^an dated June 10* . and to formally recognise the applicants reguestTi^T^'^ to table action on his original 4 unit PRD«N'^^t^\ ■i-i : Zoning Administrator Mabusth'ravieued‘.for "ouneil the Variance Application'of Mr«>Thoi Sarenpa. ip S#:,; •4 Ip.*• ■ 1 fi •. •.. Nr. Thoaas Sarcnpa was peasant. Butlar aovad. A4au saeondad to approva tha sida satbaekoC 3.S' and hardcovar variance. Notion. Ayes (5) - Wavs (•). ^ fffi aiLOOR HOLLAMOCa 3St Bollandor Road rraliainary Sobdivision Zoning Adainistraeor Habusth ravlawad for tha Council tha Prallninary Subdivision application of Mrs. Hildur Hollander. Mrs. Hollander was present. Van Nest oovad. Hurr seconded, to approve tha prelialnary subdivision per Planning Conais- Sion'S reconaendations subject to staffs inspecting the possibility of a private driveway easeaent through lot 3 and 4 to serve lot 5. council Is concerned with direct access to County Road 6 off lot 5. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). •698 NARVXII 8BXBOLO 1699 North Psra Road Vsrisnee ^ir.. , • ■ 4 • r Mr. Marvin Selbold and his attorney Mr. Bob Mitchell was present for this application. Councllmeober Tlo Adaas wanted It stated In the record that he was a partner in the fara that Mr. Seibold purchased and he did not feel he had a conflict of interest, if anyone on the council felt he did, ho would step down. Council saw no problen and decided it would be7aceeptable for councllaeaber Adaas to stay seated at the council ' table.. ... . .. : .■ • ;>■ ■■■ . : " .T Van Nest Boved, Butler secondedT^to^appreve a 90 lakeshore width variance for lot6 blk J. aubject to^r4^, the filing of an aoended Plowage and Conservation :« easeaent peraitting construction of a joint or single residential dock per L.H.C«0.%stenderds. > Applicant is to work with staff In deteralnlng the best aethod oC reaching shoreline withHalted use of hardcover. Dockage Halted to "two slips. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Couocllaeaber Adaaa abstained. (1). •699 tfXLLXAM NBAR 2160 Wayzata Blvd. Variance Mr. Kevin Conyea representing 0 Petroleua wee present. Zoning Adalnistrator Mabueth reviewed the /ariance application with the council. !•! - ■ • v' ( * A .‘V tO-LeL- i ij msimm -1 RTSnSRBR .f. '#•5^ . > f j*r for T';.-’ in LoV» V n'l ., .. 4r» r. Jt • V ^ h K«r.n'^*'ln T u-*; , !*!*r *nrli #694 .1 i’- ■M If \y.• • "*rtf .'.y •• T ’ I'i 14 ^ * f I • . { 4 •*«'«<» % #4 •<v H #M ' 4 -4 - M " ! •• tv** «f ^ f • ..:U.-fri:.j_ jr^.i • ■ 1 •»e ft /# 4?-r*>v >*'/• / •*» 4* S' * %. * * f'* • • *•>.>•*#••* i#r f ^ • • • s •» * t\^^ ! ' ' -r: * ^ rf*V r* /)LjUtL kXin, Jj l*u£j^C^ ^Jx^e^ o^ui^^ A.t^n/lAj2!c ^ /•/\ ^t/ '(U^fuuie C^c^r^C UlJ. ■ ^ ^ .*r.«(* ‘ ^-t.*' * f %a*’J>%' > •• ftir** y»v\ W>73^'- ’n '•-• *•*. #•, • / A • - .f ^ /7// /^^♦/ —~ , ^ ■*■ ■^*- •, f '*XA • i Ti^ 19t Oroao Council Iteabors Michaol ?. C*ffron» Ansistnnt Zoning Adnini*tr«tor Au^unt •» 1985 8nb)«cts ThOM* Saronpn, 1670 Shndywood Rnod - ^ ^ rollow-up to File 1694 - Bequest to A»end Original Vorinnee Approval Idot of MIbito exhibit A - Latter of Raqueat exhibit B - Survey Exhibit C - Suflonary of 1982 Action Mr. Sartr.pa, in 1982, was granted a aide setback variance and hardcover variance to allow construction of a new detached garage 20*x24* and driveway apron 14'x24*. The conditions of approval were that he reaove a 16.3 r.8.3* storage shed and remove the concrete slabs between the n«w and old garages. The total of the addition was 816 s.f. and the total to be reeoved was 300 s.f. for a net Increase of 516 s.f. of hardcover. Now, Mr. Sarenpa requests that he be mlloM to leave the shed and slabs because he never constructed the 14 x24 apron (3 36 s.f.). • - - • • However, he has addedt a) 40 lineal feet of 3*6* wide sidewalk '••• 140 s.f. b) A triangular rock bed underlain with plastic next.^to^the new garage, about 60 s.f. '.4: • V* * '•*rp •* ' • • #** the hou^and*around the shed area. This appears - • --- triance was granted Comprises approximate^ ■m nay have existed when the variance was granted bo into account at that time. ' 4--^ hardcover. ;o -lepede^* ;*;jr ■ r • end t^en -Vi: V • ) A canvas covered pipe storage rack ’;d^«4 questionable whether it is hardcover, but would^ee direct rainfall infiltration and comprises 96 s.f. Hence, the total hardcover added or unaccounted fbr'previously appears to bet 140+60+140^300*96 * 736 s.f. • kt* * m affect, the applicant has added nearly twice the equivalent hardcover area of the 14'x24' driveway apron he loft off. ^ ♦■he now circumstances, staff recoBBsends that the applicant be advised Jo subiit a new variance application and go through the proce.s so that Council will have benefit of the Planning Commission review. • e<i* • m .V* * •off < ' • • -.e % ■ >'C •t . ‘ * 1 31 r i 1 'C * CITY.*' :L*.: OP "'llOPONO .M ClTYoTORONO i>w«.I> Thoaa* Sac«npa 1679 Shadywood load Wayzata« HH 55391 Ra: Raquaat to not caaove ahed and concrete alaba (Application 1694) Osar Mr* Saranpa: On August 12* 1985 the City Council briefly reviewed youe request to amend the original variance approval which allowed the construction of a second garage and slab subject to removal of certain items of existing hardcover. Staff reviow of your site on August 8* 1985 indicated that certain additional hardcover items not previously approved had been added* i.e. sidewalk and gravel landscape beds underlain by plastic sheeting. *• I *. •• > ■W i ■'T Council directed that your request* if pursued* must be in the form of a new variance application, hence I have enclosed a copy of the variance application. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely* f y •t Michael P.Caffron ' Enclosure .. y ; w * iT. f. / ■ t m --j / i.-e Vi*'- Ki v-V-'J-i v')-*' 4^'. -.', . #yr-i . /; i’“V $»> \'i'* • »-r;t r • r j' KHtOCHC A ZONfSG - 47MSI7 Assrssiwc AlMM9m4T10N A FINAMCt - 47I 725I •-r*' •* • ‘ * ■ •,' t* / ^ a .4fc. ,. ‘'18.-WV iH !i 11 T":' tr ■ • -.yv’ ^Ji r*---1 -i'4- txi-'5> •-•'ll / "v r;. L '// / J 1/ (1A c ('• /i u S^' **l /p /5: /5* /• l/.i-i- uj P/ ^<-tf.,^r Va-/- C-Olz-f c*u legal OESCRIPTION of premises S'J<?ygYFO- The South 2 feet of Lot 7 and dll of Lot 8. ShAOrwOOO. O: dv.*noles iron marker Hearing*: shown are based upon an assumed datus).^ J •vH. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ *C ^ o. % . DATE: \ugust 2, % '5'^; ITEJVINO.: Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: ^2036 Robert Gountanis. 1098 Loma Linda Avenue - Variances Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Total lot area = 6,812 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances The following are the variances as amended per the directives of the Planning Commission recommendation. Four of the si.x member Commission in attendance voted unanimously to approve Option 3 for the redevelopment of the substandard parcel. Councilmembers are encouraged to review the enclosed suff memo dated July 7, 1995 lor greater detail on the three options of development presented by the applicant. 1. 2. 3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 1,284.8 s.f. W Case 3 original proposal = 1,541.5 s.f. Case 3 amended proposal = 1,492.7 s.f. No variance required. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback. Required = 75’ Steps Principal structure Garage Variance = 45’ or 60% Existing 27’ 23 ’ 60’ Case 3 Proposed 33 ’ 30 ’ 63’ 6" Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback. Allowed = 0 Existing = 8’ Case 3 proposed = 0 No variance required. Request for Council Action continued page 2 August 2. 1995 Zoning Fi’c #2036 Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B). A. Left side setback: Required — 10 ’ Existing = 6’ 5" Case 3 proposed = 10 ’ No variance required. B Right side: Required = 10 ’ (adjacent to public access) Existing = -6" (encroachment into public access) Case 3 original proposal = -6" Case 3 amended proposal = 3’ Variance = 7 ’ or 70% C.Street setback. Required = 30 ’ Existing = 5’ 4’ Case 3 proposed = 5’ 4' 5. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover 0-75 ’ setback area = 5,348 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 1,338.15 s.f. or 25% Case 3 original proposal = 1,201.7 s.f. or 22% Case 3 amended proposal = 1,097.7 s.f. or 20.5% Hardcover decrease = 104 s.f. or 1.9% 75-250 ’ setback area = 1.464 s.f. Allowed = 366 s.f. or 25% Existing = ’58.25 s.f. or 11.% Case 3 original proposal = 913.7 s.f. or 62% Case 3 amended proposal = 965 s.f. or 65.9% Variance = 599 s.f. or 40.9% (original variance = 547.7 s.f. or 37.4%) Additional E.xhibit U - Amended Proposal Approved by Planning Commission Request for Council Action continued page 3 August 2, 1995 Zoning File #2036 Brief Description of Request Councilmembers are encouraged to review the staff memo enclosed dated July 7, 1995 and the Plannin g Commission minutes of the July 17, 1995 meeting for more background and detail on this review. Of the three improvement options for the redevelopment of this property, the Planning Commission opted for Case 3 which involved the relocation of a new structure awav from the lake at the approximate size of the existing structure. The single detached garage would now be an attached two-stall garage approved by the Planning Commission at 22 ’ x 22 ’ (original 24 ’ x 22 ’). The current single-stall garage has an access door that faces the street. The proposed attached garage would now have side loading doors. The expanded drive area and enlarged garage result in exce*=sive increases in hardcover in the 75-250 setback area. Side setbacks are improved with the Case 3 proposal. There will be no encroachment of an average lakeshore setback line. Strucmral coverage is under the allowed 1,500 s.f. Hardcover in the 0-75’ setback area has decreased from 25% to 20.5%. Hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area incr''ases from 11% to 65.9%. Note the intensity ot the increase results from the limite*^ ■••.a w,.iiin the 75-250 setback zone at 1,464 s.f. The Planning Commission opined that Cases 1 and 2 involving either partial or total repair of the existing foundation was a "band aid" approach to improvement of the property. Members noted that leaving the property for seasonal use would not solve any problems as the property would remain an eyesore. In fact, the adjacent neighbor to the immediate nonh was present to support the improvement of the property. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the improvement plan that would involve the reconstruction of a new two-story principal structure at a 38.5’ x 26.2 footprint. Note this approval w ill allow squaring off of comers at the lakeside allowing a 3’ x 8’ expansion from the original footprint at both the northeast and southeast comers of the stmemre. The Planning Commission would not approve the squaring off of the corners of structure in its present location. "I'he Plarming Commission also approved a 22 x 22 single story attached garace to be located a minimum of 3’ from the right side yard adjacent to the pubiic access and held structural coverage to the maximum allowed amount of 1.500 s.f. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; To deny, adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (A) AND 2, AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2036 pus; WHEREAS, Robert J. Gounianis (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1098 Loma Linda Avenue within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lot 10, Loma Linda, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property ); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for the following variances that would permit constniclion of a 26.2’ x 38.5- two-story residence and single-story 22' x 22‘ '"“I’e A®“r“®Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - lakeshote setback. Required = 75’ Existing =23 ’ Proposed = 30 ’ (principal structure = 30 ’, steps at lakeside — 33 , garage = 63 ’ 6") Variance = 45’ or 60% B.Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 5,348 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 1,338.15 s.f. or 25% Proposed or variance = 1,097.7 s.f. or 20.5% 75-250’ setback area = 1.464 s.f. Allowed = 366 s.f. or 25% Proposed = 965 s.f. or 65.9% Variance = 599 s.f. or 40.9% Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) Required = 35’ Existing = 5’ 4" Proposed = 5’ 4" Variance = 29 ’ 8" or 85% - street setback. Page 1 of 6 D. Minnesota: 3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) - right side setback. Required = 10’ Existing = -6" Proposed = 3 ’ Variance = 7’ or 70% NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R£SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2036. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 6,812 s.f. or .16 acre. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application at their July 17, 1995 meeting and recommended approval of the variance application as amended, based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Lot 10 of the Loma Linda plat was created in 1912 prior to any standards for residential development. B. C. Based on the City Assessor ’s record, the existing residence structure was built in 1934 prior to any standards for residential construction within the township at that time. The City’s tax records back to 1974 indicate the former owner received homestead credit from 1974 to 1981. The property has been non- homesteaded to the current time. D. Major portions of the property are located in the lakeshore protected area. 5,348 s.f. is located within the 0-75’ setback area and 1,464 s.f, is located within the 75-250’ setback area. Page 2 of 6 4. 5. E.Tlw curvature of the shoreline to the southeast of the property intensifies the impact of the lakeshore setback upon limited building envelope of this propert)’. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propertv’ are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property' in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Pl?n of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above to permit ^f'nstruction of a two-story residence at 26.2’ 38.5 ’ that may extend no closer than 30 ’ to the . noreline and a single-story attached garage at 22’ x 22’ that may extend no closer than 63 ’ 6 ” to the shoreline, a right side setback variance of 7’ or 70%, a street setback variance of 29’ 8" or 85% and hardcover variances within the 0-75’ setback area at 1,097.7 s.f. or 20.5% and in the 75- 250’ setback area at 599 s.f. or 40.9%. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant or applicant’s contractor shall be responsible for obtaining a demolition permit for removal of the residence and single-stall garage structures. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall submit an amended survey as shown on Page 6 of this resolution confirming the location of all improvements as approved by the City. Applicant shall also provide an updated hardcover analysis of all approved improvements and a drainage plan. Pace 3 of 6 ^rr 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date ot Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14, 1996). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of August, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this I4th day of August. 1995 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Patie 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ____day of___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county , personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTS ’OF HENNEPIN ) On this ___day of____, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) e.xecuted the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of _, 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Pace 5 of 6 6 Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:July 7, 1995 Sobject: #2036 Robert Gountanis, 1098 Loma Linda Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR>1B Total lot area = 6,812 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (Q - Review of structural coverage Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 1,284.8 s.f. or 18.9% Case 1 proposed = 1,541.5 s.f. or 22.6% Case 2 proposed = 1,541.5 s.f. or 22.6% Case 3 proposed = 1,541.5 s.f. or 22.6% Variance = 41.5 s.f. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback. Required = 75’ Existing steps = 27’ Principal struemre = 23’ Garage = 60’ Cases 1 & 2 proposed: Steps = 27’ Principal structure Garage = 60’ Case 3 proposed: Steps = 33’ Principal structure = 30’ Garage = 60’ = 21.5’ Section 10.32, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback Allowed = 0 Existing = 8 ’ Cases r & 2 proposed = 8 ’ Case 3 proposed = 0 Section 10.22, Subdivision 5 (B) . A. Side setbacks. l.eft side: Required = 10’ Existing = 6 ’ 5" Cases 1 & 2 proposed = 6’ 5 Case 3 proposed = 10’ —tia r'.*« V 77 1 Zoning File #2036 July 7, 1995 Page 2 Right side: Required = 10 ’ (adjacent to public access) Existing * -0.58’ or 6"encroachment into public access Proposed Cases 1, 2 3 = -0.58’ or 6" B Street setback. Required = 30’ Existing = 5’ 4" Cases 1, 2 & 3 proposed = 5* 4" S. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 5,348 s.f. 75-250’ setback area * 1,464 s.f. Allowed 0 366 s.f. or 25% Existing 1,338.15 s.f. or 25%158.25 s.f. or 11% Cases 1 & 2 proposed 1,366.7 s.f. or 25.5%760.8 s.f. or 52% Case 3 proposed 1,201.7 s.f. or 22%913.7 s.f. or 62% List of Exhibits A - Application Bl-2 Applicant’s Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners’ List El-2 Hardship Statement F - Survey G - Case 1 & 2 Hardcover Facts, 0-75’ Setback Area H - Case 1 & 2 Hardcover Facts, 75-250’ Setback Area I - Case 1 & 2 Hardcover Site Plan J - Case 1 Floor Plan K - Case 1 Elevations L - Case 2 First Floor Plan M - Case 2 Second Floor Plan N - Case 2 Elevations O - Case 3 Hardcover Facts, 0-75’ Setback Area P - Case 3 Hardcover Facts, 75-250’ Setback Area Q - Case 3 Hardcover Site Plan R - Case 3 First Floor Plan S - Case 3 Second Floor Plan T - Case 3 Elevations Zoning File #2036 July 7, 1995 Pigc3 Dcscriptioo nX Request Applicant has presented three alternatives for the redevelopment of this severely substandard parcel. Review Exhibit B-2, applicant’s description of those three options. Case 1 Review *^xhibits G, H, I. J and K. This improvement plan involves an 8’ x 3 expansion of the footprint at the northeast and southeast comer to the lakeside o tte Exhibit J existina foundatton would be approved along the destgnated Itne. The da shows the 3' x 8' new foundation section. The remainder of the struemre ts not ^^'4uaie sup^rt expansion or improvement of the second level. Stmeture wtll rematn as shown w.th only a first floor living area. Review Exhibit I. Applicant proposes an addition to the existing garage, major portions of whic^rbe located ouf of the 0%5’ setback area. Garage dottrs wtll be rel^ated to^ rfU nf structure The existine garaee has doors opening out onto Loma Linda. The existing single stall garage is of quesUonable structural condition. It is doubtful whether this structure can be expand^ upon. It is also doubtful whether the City would approve ot improvement of a structure that encroaches 6" into a year-round public access. Case 2 Review Exhibits G, L. M and N. There ts no dtfference either Case I or 2 This improvement plan calls for the rounding oil ot the 3 x 8 comers on fh n tS nnd Lth side of the structure at lakeside. In this case, the entire foundation would ^ r^nraced all ™ no for an expa^on of the second store. Review Exhibits M and N. note thts UnTa complete second storv addttion. The only portion of structure that will extend beyo^ the existinc footprint are the steps and from stoop that will encroach another “ 'he lakeshore y'ard. Note hardcover improvements are the same for noth Cases 1 and The for the detached garage remain the same as it was in Case 1. Case 3 Review Exhibits O, P. Q. R. S and T. In this option of improvement, applicant proposes f, 1 ^ , Tn of the same footprint funher away from lake and the garage would now be n Z stmemr^Z auhe same approximate location from the street and right side yard. attached to h located 10’ from the left side lot line. Compare the setback results The .structure wo setbacks noted above. Hardcover for this improvement plan is and the increased to 62% in the 75-250- setback area. reduced ' c -p poor plans succest only a second tloor expanston over the prtncipalRevtew Exhibits R, S and 1. tlm P ^ ^ stmeture lootprtm. Note in tmelev^^^^^^^ cmcrll ^yonTL average lakeshore setback line of the residence to the immediate north. Zoning File #2036 July 7“, 1995 Page 4 History off Property Lot 10 of the Loma Linda plat was created in 1912. Based on the Assessor's record, the structure was built in 1934 prior to any standards tor residential construction within the township at that time. The property was not zor^d until November 20, 1950 at which time it became part of the Forest Lake district requiring a 75’ minimum frontage and 15,000 s.t. minimum lot area. In 1967, the area was rezoned to an R-IC district requiring one acre. In 1975, it was rezoned to LR-IB requiring also one acre in area and included more restrictive standard for lakcshore development. Tax records back to 1974 indicate that the former owner received homestead credit trom 1974 to 1981. The property has been non-homesteaded to the current time. From 1974 to 1995, the former owner ’s address was listed to a Minneapolis address. Statement of Hardship Review Exhibits Fl-2. applicant ’s hardship statement. Issues for Consideration .....What levels of improvement are reasonable for this property 1. Will you allow structural improvements to the existing structure? What degree of structural improvement is acceptable? Even it only partial foundation repair is to be completed, existing structure must be raised. Would you allow only replacement of the existing foundation or will you allow the 3’ x 8’ expansions to the northeast and southeast side of residence? 2. Would you allow a new garage to be located within the footprint of the 14 x 22 existins garage? If not, how far should structure be relocated from right side lot line and provide adequate area for driveway and turnaround at north side of garace structure? ... 3’? 5’? Why can t garage be reduced to a 20 north/south dimension rather than the 24’ proposed? 3 Will you approve a structural coverage variance for these improvement plans? Applicant shows an excess of 41.5 s.f. over the allowed 1,500 s.f. 4 Would you allow the expansion of the roof structure within the 8’ average lakeshore setback for Cases 1 and 2? The roof e.xpansion involves merely an alteration in the roof line. 5. If you are to provide direction to the applicant, the following points must be addressed in your recommendation: Zoning File n036 July 7, 1995 Page 5 Proposed garage. What is a reasonable size for the detached garage and will you approve the existing 5.4 ’ street setback as long as doc*rs face away from street? .... What is a reasonable right side setback from the public access and still allow enough room for a side door loading garage? Note the majority of the strucmral improvements would be located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Should garage be relocated to the northwest side yard? B. What level of structural improvements would you approve? • Replacement of partial foundation, complete foundation or total rebuild. C. If foundation is replaced or structure relocated, would you limit second story expansions above principal structure? D. Would you allow a second story expansion above the garage if attached to residence? Options of Action 1. 3. Approval. If members feel applicant has provided enough information so that a plan can be amended per Planning Commission’s direction for Council’s review, then you may act on this application, or 2. Table. Planning Commission may wish to review the amended proposal before passing it onto Council for formal action; or Denial. Members should refer to Section 10.08. Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12) for necessary findings to be addressed if a variance application is to be recommended for denial. Members may find the unique history of this property and the way propeny has been used in recent years that the property can no longer be upgraded to a year-round residence but can continue to serve for seasonal recreational use. Isv Il c o (c I ’ I • ••w • CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conionning structures S-00.00 After-the-Faci Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY CSTOR>UTION ^ y/ Site Address /£> Un4 --------- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^----------------------—- Anach legal descripc.on lo application if not .nduded on required a«ne.. Date PropetTv Acquired Tr-r^ A—-----------------UnS-. -,. ............ I do)(T3o not5 also own the adjacent parcels ot land. PresenrusTotpropertv:^ presidential -----other tspecif>')^--------------------------- Zoning District: ^ applicant CITY OF CFCnO finance office ni "L'-V ihti^ * • "»: *» r •sW*V LM 'w*YOU PPLIC.ANT / a ^ J - Name D€AT Address: ^/F Phone thome') 7i^/ ^ _ Phoneiwork) ____ - Cirv: Zip:.fTy^ 7^ . — / ONVNXR (if differen^^an applKant) Ph“orkf (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARL\NCES REQUIRED Lot .Area ___Lot Width ^ Setback:Front X Side X Hardcover X Rear ___Lot Coverage X Average Lakeshore X Other (specifv’) //K£^ --------------------------------------- compliance with Zoning Code requirements: jf r/Ac/f/■(C.- ------- 1. 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AH «f H.> followin. infnnnation subnUned by tM Wfflirntion j^;i(jline date in ordit for vour application to b< considered completei ■7 of owners within 150’ (you must obum_to 'is' from Hennepin County Depamnem of Finance. A-603. Gom Center, :>48-3.71). ✓ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). , . , ^ ^ ~ CerttfJte of Survey (signed by a licensed sur^•eyor) -d ^ hardcover ----calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i .x 11 tor VA Top^rapSc surv ey (existing and proposed elevations)Jf any changes in c^^sung grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i x 11 for reproduc lo / Sketches or plans of Qoor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S/i x 11 ). ~ List of the legal names (include marital stams) ot all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons you wish notified of this application. ?_ Addiiional items as may be requested by City statf. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. .nnliratinn is not complete if the ahove information hqs not heen im.luded. Tl^applkant terebj^alre^ provide all imbrmation required or requested by the Zoning Mmm“ ac Js to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by ongmal fee paymenO and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is true and conec( to the besyif his/her knowledge. yf /'///. Applicant’s Signamre 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. _ Date The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entrv onto the property by City staff, consthants, agents. Commission members, and Counci members for purposes of investigation and verification ot this request. DateOwner's Signamre_______________________________ Annlicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetinf^ Plamima Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each mon ^ ADoUc^ts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, plea mi^e to have an authorized agent anend in your place and to advise the Building & Zomng Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^//'s £^^/y4^/p ^'f . l,<^(As ^ A^f/^ A^, yJZ /A Af/lfeM^A/f A AS iee^ SiV^^SS '^/f?fl a/A3)Ay /} 7^yy*A /^SS //>/n ///J / y Af^AP^ 7^ ^ A A A T~X^ Z r /y AA/j /r*^.JL^'^ C^f/ZAcr~ A fc \ A>£*'A Z^A\ (?. /sr / ^/yf/f^t^'p//iese^^^^yfr</y^B ^9 .........^ ^ ^/f'M, ^ . /iE€tfAA’S':^/^pc /yJftP 'f- . ^ ^ yy * ^ ^ jV__ y^AiS' ys 3^r/ /rX^'^A-'typpr^ A SEC oa^P P'yt?Ay, y'j/: y J / I T.n: S /j y^' 0 c A aaS yi EC- .' / ^'tE y /V.' X^ '\>/ y^ESC- /V S^aa EP A >0 / c<j/f'^/.y/'/~^<ry^iL-p ^y/(y^E jvm-e a^ p^y^e *^J- ^(<yp Cyf.fe ^^- - Z Z.'y 2 //A^rfjE Jf AyU>A^/? /f-Uy’A^ ^r~A/*>i /^/l p" E^f-JK/E AS Aiiy^A/ y^Ayf S''^/^ St^ P CfiA^A^y/Hf /v ^/ O ^ S<E ^^AcSis AAy'P dCA/i se^^'hs^^ k. ///; CASE/^f^^S^A^ys TA^ C^fh C'// C^Je C*'^S/ECA/Ay^ rL^ /^/i&- £y/j //aj S/ziuc/c'SES A A/P E/e Ja iU / Ic c/f.A 'si>S. 4? “V^ . i ;• V*;yO \ ■I (I)in •• • (55) m (24) fisi^-A.••\(25) (rO««4lT LOTS 1.7.1.32.33: 3*.35 » 9 »*C. STRICT) -- ■ 200 ! ^ t LOMA LINDA AVE ■STTB a '4^v r ft Is J PkJak:;l r (12) 10iJV \ U T oc 4 :» (n) tr» 12- ✓..4......... (222 •i *r in _,n-23'Z3 m 24- 9\i 0» (2ll 25 “ LU I.OMA * LINDA P (13) . W .'•48 5 " 4(5) IfO * \ «\ T \ it 5" :tc P R S (7)P S’ .:•?• %<?>P ?01 P « ,V i°’Jf V \ X \ CD CD \ \ *1 • A . [Q V *2 ( ID \ fii \ (M rit 4- ‘ ILID «0-J5 ’I occ NO »«2oe; (2) 1S. */•LOMA LINDA AV! 1h«w % (3)/ ' / % r A (27) •V / \ --------------------- ■■ — .. ■ ■ - 1 I ■■ ■ ■ —■» F JV 1 \ '90 • F 3 2 \ ^ 165 • ►-— V«C 12-2 6<hled •X'•:••■' (5) 1 \ GOVT LOT 4 , . MM MTI (M/14/9f> .- -.A; V;.* • •*• • 1 r - .% V -Wp\MEftCPXN COUNTY KOKRTY INratMATlIM SYSTEM PMOPCRTY OMCRS LIST ,, •’tTAK^mil NMK/AMm\ ^:r'- 8 .M M-117-ES XS 0007 01000 LONO LINDA AVE R r RAOUNZ a C N IIA0UN2 MOfirr F RAOUNZ UOS RIVER OLUFF CXR RUKRONeTON m SB0S7 H-r...r OM€R MHi TAXI^AYill NANE/AOM Sa M-117-2S IS 0010 01000 torn LINDA AVE N N iOCAnAI#4 A N L DOCANAHN HXLLXAH N DOCRHANN 1000 LQHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN D5SA4 j %•? 1 ♦ ^PIIOO ADDA (MCA NANE 1 TANAAYEA •KANi/ADDA SO 00-117-IS IS OOlS 01140 LOMA LINDA AVE 0 i 0 HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHA 0 4 0 HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHA C/0 LUELLA GOLDBEAQ 7010 TVJAA DA EDINA HN 6S450 AAOA ADDA (MCA NAHi TAKPAYEA NAHE/ADDA TOTAL BATCH 505 QQQQ9 i I 'ii. t N • »' i ■ • •• \.» •X / f m ? •• J V AEPOAT NO4 PI4S54Q1 AAOt IS * •so 00-117*IS IS 0000 01074 LQKA LINDA AVE HAAGAAET E HATTSON HAAGAAET E HATTSON 1074 LQHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN B5S44 J^0 SO 00-117-IS IS 0000 01001 LQHA LINDA AVE A N 4 P DAIVAAI ANOSAQN 4 PATEHEN DAIVAAI ES54 CHEAAYNOOO AD HirtCTOTiU m 55S0B * ■.■<! i »- • -J•C;' ‘0 •} • ^ SO 00-117-IS IS 0011 OlOOB LQHA LINDA AVE LOUIS HEAHAN LOUIS HERMAN S140 CNQNEN AVE SO tI05 HPLS HN 55414 SO 00-llf-IS IS 001£ OllSO LOHA LINDA AVE N H BOCAHAItl ET AL N/L EST NILLXAH A BOCKHAW IISO LOHA LINDA AV HOUND HN 55S44 f f SB 0B-117-IS IS 0011 OHIO LOHA LINDA AVE N J I C J POLLARD HILLIAH J 4 CAROL J POLLARD 1110 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 5SS44 SO 0B-117-IS IS OOlf 01045 LOHA LINDA AVS T G OSTEWERG/K J OSTERBERO TIHOTNY G/KRISTI J OSTERBERO 1045 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND m 55S44 ' ' Vi> ^ r I CCRTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEDGE AND BELIEF « * DATE * • 4 f i* ^r Tiis^a 'jf /> r/i€^/^A/se*^^ C/"^/ Tl^ ^4-fB^ i^C'(<- //^S» Ci^AA^^'^^y a J-/-^ 7X^ ^ - 7S^^ fB^^^AcJC ABd^ o/AGry*t^A^/^ T^4^ /^7P fhAe. Ti Sj A^ AY^a /"/S c J^a /^ fAAT/P A"A A/a cj ^ I ^ L J> B a S(^ I'/l&Om 71(a ^ cA&J t^f^^AAe 7% /M^fAA7i^f79~/^^^AY<^A7^ £^,^tc^ A At/A/ZA-t L*r-7 ^ f- 'B-A/u'/ Ayr /s/BBA>f A^7> 7a £~^f 7 ^ /\ ^ f tA^ /(^ r^O^A, Ct^/iAfM^Jca ,,^S9 c ^A/ ic'f/f ^$r/if> SB'/^Ac7^ a -F 7/ecfftU^l/ Y^^^'/Pa ^ SP^^Aa A^ T(f ^AA/^B c^A S F f~ A 77e A AA/< A / / dr A^ >P^ f/^A/^ T7£~7BAA- 7/b^ / A^’S 777^ />' /i(r^Lf/A^^ '^ A'/// W^ t7b A/f* 77p fa^^,'7X7^Ay7 or/t/i/eA^ A p P 7, A^'f 7 A A 7 ^Ai’^c^j'77 ij^ 7r c<,*AAf-/^7 TycpCB^, 77^^ A 7^C^A 7 7b a 7^*-'^ ^A A (^ A riA^C ^ ■/. 7d if es ‘f'/H F~ //AecpL>f/<d^d^' iy CJdA. Jt'/l » 7)'/y s<F^7tA^^s) 7as ^"^^ 7j r'/7^j:>, 77/p CAS^ AuJf f/7r f7p cpaa ^'^^/a ^'p7a -7/^a ^ 7f> Cdryl iy l^/77 T/tP r/dy//A /idpP/Afytd^^'/ fi f ^3'^ FdA 7cc;7/P^f - hSa F^ylc/a A7BCT/A.^ tL*- f(?(?nAyy TfA 777 /7?vs<^^ 77/c ?7ck /y /A^c^y^ /A'' /cp 77 /.f 7rA/^y> y c? r/r^ <• F 77 7pc ^sb a f^'P 77 7 u77tr/^,/y 7i*f'’ 77/A^)r Fi /-A^'d^ry/ AA'/tPP tp / /F t7 // A^y c c'r r^c: " 77- 7p ^'7 7- *7^/> ^7/A^PdP ^P/Ace /y PBBDPP 7o f^c', A/A/d 7FU' ^7^ 7^ pF A P 7 A A A ly 7^ 7/B c c'/lApP/ 7. /hUAfe t^kicCi y /F^7 27 /J B7yP>A/^P B£> 7d _ /f^ Cci/H/YPc/A fe- 7ePC> CA/17» T// p d p/ApS/fy /V J]p 2. i^/z7. 77;^p^rop^^sAF CcAJ<B^7) AJke/iSS 7^ 77d pe^F/AcMs c.pr7^nArFy Bp/pP/Y/ ^"/7F T/id yHBSAA^T' XycAF/zp'^d fy/pu^py^p-A/F P>A - C-/i/ o^DSfK A /r///£= J^<f^./fj;=/< ^ ffi/\ aaA /> J\'J^>//<'0. TCh CAS^ Af r/F/Ht;- ^S tV^^ Aci^r f~/^ !>^y^ A . ^/<r F/ A- / 2 Afil/SF, A Se^c>'^J> S J^*?/'<^ Ai£^S /~ F jC e c^>^^^'/L XA o^A^^S A x ‘ C*F~t / ^ A^a ^SA^J • ^ SF ^ ^ Sf-C^^ c/jT /^yi^ o' / 'y //A^ 7"/^ r9^X/ y A^^*S ’F~ /^-5 ^f‘<rA r/ ^J> 4'X 7^^ Xt<J(^ !>'A Ay>' ^ /i^S* A f ^Ud ASP- /7 7^ FiA^X"PP ^ fL SAP XT, */a . A/^P a X SjC p SA^p/-/^ie ^/A-^Vtrpp XC^ aSPsA///\^ . pf f/iP /X<^/<pAi^, X/irT ^ASP /^<5=c^ S^/^yA^tyC,///, / j * XA P A7^/1. 7^ / / 7^ /^/Pc' P SA €l Aa^^JP A~^^AA X4.(i^ XAAC(P X/S>A^yFSAtP as ppSS/i>J<PAMP HFPf f^e HP^A aa O S//>P ra^X/j/tcXs^ XAX- XXp/X a (^'^sP Ap ^aaa 9^ / s , f X f xa /^p as x 'asp x Jp ^aaA(^a‘ P s a /X acA s Xc/ XpP^AiSc^SP* Pi// ^a SP /ri/-^(SS XA P/fAMO Ai^y 'AM /A/ PA^^ s>-/X' s Ait^c A sj'/'A/(p. Ja ,' a /C c a /PS a UvA A a ^ A/pP^y:^f A AS AePju ^'-ia Jp /2? XA a //AAP P*> ^'PA^/Ay S/tS s — cof^S f^sA/f A ea ' P - PA fS A/y^‘ <Tif^<// '//^- ,u s /> //(y (SAse^App^yy; f X^ ApsX/^iP'pP XX^ c^XA pa spX A A /I Pip s/Ap''^^p ^ Xs^ 1 ’ j—^ iAt /tt P^'" ■• O ; i :■ ■■‘9))I6 >/il7/2J CXX/TAfOS, BCMlV.ADVANCE SURVEYING A ENGINEERING CO.5ms. IKcy Me ISI Mnnwln-^r. MN 55545 rheme <hl2) 474 79t»4 f ox («12) 4741267SURVEY FOR BOB GOVTANIS ^RVEYED May 19,1555 ussA LPmKmmL PRAFirn, May 24. 1995 m-VlSLP Jtiwe. 1.1995 SJ995i Lot 10. LOKM LINDA, Itetmepin Coualy. Miwietota UMHADiJNS- Wc have surveyed ihe abt>ve desenbed pfopcrly whicb llie ciicni daims lo own or appeals lo owii fioni WMMt govcrmncfit records We make no iej>rcscnIa!ion ftial tl»e cliem does in fact own the property nor that a search of the records has been made lo determine llie rxient aiul naiuie uf his luildmgs if there is any doidn concerning the accuracy cd* the legal desatption. compelcnl legal nxinsd should be retained to perform a till search and issue a Idle opinion for our use in preparing the survey We sliow only tliosc casemems which the client informs us of or winch we happen to become awaie of ttuough other sources The survey shows only those wnprovemertts which are visible and which we deem important SIAHOARI) SYMBQi,? Ai rONVI NTIONS "o" l>cnotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing Slate License Number 92)5, set. if "o" is filled m. then dholes found if on nu^nument CliRIlFJfATION. I hereby certify that this survey was pie|>arcd by me or under my diicct supervision and that I am i ^nal Sui vcyor undci the Laws of tfic Slate of Minnesota ^S^ALn. ON! INCH LQUALS 2» IHI EXISTING HARDCOVER TABULATION b * 75 HOUSE 964 GARAGE 300 DECKS & STOOPS 54 RIPRAP 222 a • 75 TOTAL ____15^ 75-250 GARAGE'2 b DECKS A STOOPS 4 gravel drive '100 75 - 250 TOTAL 124 TOr4J..Mil'4Jlf rr rr oi u>f I -I hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE). 75-250’250-500 ’SDO-HxmT G A. House 3C.jr X 2^. Z - Lenffh J9.0 X Width 2£>>z.XT cAfiMhy X “ X ■ B. Garage LfSS ^ C. Driveway ^ Z2.Z X « n^r X y d X jr /o ^2 . X • D. Sidewalk X X * ECai. L^’iwK 8 X 3. 7 X A « F. Landscape —X - Underlain __-X * Bv Plastic G. Other X “ X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A /’%3^./r - ^ S'J PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE CAS£ X 100 « A. House 3£.i Length Width \ % X B. Garage C. Driveway ZZ.l. X X D. Sidewalk X X E. f^Ar l±- X X F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL hardcover IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A r ■? 7 -• B 5'3^8 ._X KX) = 7f?./ S.F. S. s. S.F. S.F. S.F. JZ*f S.F — 3/>ZJT' 27 S.F. S.F. S.F S.F 3Z S.F 2 2.2 S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F " % 7 S.F S.F, S.F S.F V S.F S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. ZS'S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A B r' ' r"-:. , / J?^4.7 S.F. A ^3^8 S.F. B riti-fi klf'.tk I wi-rL^iir*»w ’*t I t Mm • rt Htiaear^flkrrfhr'-.^nvtfn'T , I r hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE> 0-75’ 250-500’500-1000’ rYTSTTNn HARDCOVER IN ZO.NX S.F.A House %* iTV* LengdI Width * “S.F. - £«S.F. X »S.F. B.Garaged /p.r X S' ii-2 2A ^S_ S.F. C.IT5ri vpwav -TV /c rZ >2 7. S.F. O^vc^i p/L_X /O - /S>0 S.F. D.X .S.F. X -S.F. E.iPji f irt/T^cc Ic X »S.F. Jr altiw/ 1.XVVIV X *S.F. F.I _nnH^C2ine X S.F. 1 Tnrf^rl Tin X -S.F. \J UUwi l<MII Rv Plustic X S.F. G. DV r icwliW OfK^r X S.F. TOTAL hardcover I.N ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - /r8.2S S F. J . ^ S.F. t » ctX 100 PROPOSED hardcover IN ZONE £■ ^ C^S/r B A. House______________* ----- Length Width B. c. Garaee uesJ Dnvcwav Z2.1- ZZiZ- g D. Sidewaik E. F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X X A X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 V J^‘6 G. Other ri2,s S.F. - j zy s'r?.____s F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - B 100 = t' A B (t •--r g ^0 / i>•- y y^O,8 S.F. A S.F. B vTg. % CUT ype O./’/iAr PAA(U!A/(^ C J. A/M^P 7S y'SAcK LAKE MINNETONKA (NORTH ARM) 1 <r-a/QCJ r ?T Jf/3 ^ /7i /^oori i C CL os^r : I bat// L/7/NG AOOT'^i 3 AT// Q -///i w - - • ( Tir. i; •,% A KITC//3// J3 X/Z C.ICS£T n I» SH *■’ /2 A/2 CO f>. *o Q /'/^ONT \ J JFl1 «. . f 4 . 1- A/s r/M? V I N tc' J. F/<oFr 'it I - -r- yc?. F/A^ - - 3S '—if' / X. frniit;^ >! V’ / ':*/■■ --.■ i' ■ •» ' A «r / * C/9S£Z '■ ■. '•'1 '■'/~\ _ 0,P'------ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500’SQO-lflJO* EXISTINC. HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Hcose ____________ Lent*Widiii X X X B. Garage C. Dnvcway X X w^-D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTV’ AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ ^ B .X 100 PROPOSED h ardcover IN ZONE 3 A. House Z6.Z Length X X Width 17 ^ /.rj B. C. Garage ■\ T 2.L /V.32.^ Dnvcwav / c ' i* X X D. Sidewalk X X 0. Puiio/Dccic \S-fX-zz F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X G. Other / J -n TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERD’ AREA IN ZONE - A /2.0/, 7 - B XJ¥S_ 13 X 100 - .1^- 2 2L S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S F, S F. S F S.F S F S.F. S.F S F S.F S.F. S.F. \'e /COS.7 S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 0 A B i .4 ".ri:: rn; Vs \ It S.F. / /2a>A 7 S.F. S.F. A B /O r“* >0 HAJRDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET CAS. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’75-250 ’250-500 ’500-1000* t EXLSTING HARDCQN'ER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Ung^ X X X B. Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X G. Otlier TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ ^ B . PROPOSED HARDCO\TR IN ZONE A. House /7 Length Width X X X B. Garage. ,1 tZi2^%}L C. Onveway Z7,(~X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 9 /j / 7 - B ^ 9 6^ X 100 X 100 S.F. SF. S.F. S F. S F. S.F. S.F. S F S F, S F S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ?. /JTJ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. zof'. 7 S.F. c— ^ *7 jTJ^Z S.F. ^.* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F P A B .) j.*' J• r V, .3 .,iJ ' 7 S.F. S.F. A B i_2./O / /^CAOu^^s ccyj LAKE MINNETONKA O.0...V H,0„ (NORTH ARM) FLO OH i c 3AT7Mi^SI> ^/{0/y T tlif' '- fi• A !■''< J :^j f > Ii \ irt d£./y ly ^-----------£2' - -- flf . ■ % • ^request FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ DATE: August t, 1995 , ITEM NO.: I/} Department Approval: Name Jeamie A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section: Zoning Item Descripti^ #2038 Richard Heit, 1153 Elmwood Avenue - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Total lot area * 16,772 s.f. Additional Exhibit J - Gustafson Report-July 27, 1995 Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated July 6. 1995 and the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 17th for more detail and background on this review. The variance application involves a 10 ’ x 28.3’ two-stor>- expansion to the lakeside of the existing two-stor>' structure. The lakeside of the residence houses a lower level screened porch and an upper level deck. Review Exhibits E and F-1 and 2. The upper level expansion will consist of covered deck and expanded dining room area. The lower level will contain a screened porch and recreation/spa room. The existing structure at the north side is located 9’ 6 * The proposed addition will be located 2" closer to the north lot line proposed at 9 4 (total variance of 8 or 6.6%). The addition will result in 56 s.f. of new hardcover. Applicant has proposed the removal of approximatelv 153 s.f. of a plastic underliner beneath the landscaped areas to the north side of the residence. Refer to Exhibit I. Planning Commission members reviewed the property noting the difficultv of asking for additional removal of plastic underliners beneath landscaped areas^because of the obvious signs of erosion of the steep bank. The main access leading from the higher elevations at garage to the residence is provided via a wooden deck and stairway funher minimizing the impact on the steeper elevations. Hardcover exists at 52 .c and is proposed at 51%. Structural coverage on this property exists at 10.9% and is proposed at 11.3%. There is no issue of a structural coverage e.xcess. The structure will be located an additional 2 ’ beyond the average lakeshore setback line^ The existing structure is located 30’ and the proposed addition will result in a total extension of 3'’’ Refer to Exhibit I. The adjacent lot to the nonh is undeveloped. Applicant has considered the lakeside deck of residence of the second lot to the north and by the house to the immediate south The house on the south is located on higher elevations and is located approximately 86 from the side south lot line. The new addition will have no visual impact on the existing residences. Eequest for Council Action continued page 2 August 3. 1995 Zoning File #2038__________________________________ The Planning Commission noted concern with the erosion on the property and asked that the City Engineer inspect the property. The applicant had alleged the placement of the City road created special drainage problems for the propertv'. Review Exhibit J. the City Engineer and staff inspected the site to review the drainage and erosion. Staff found nothing unusual tor a property located at downside of an access road (i.e. Highwood. Rest Point). Applicant s garage and driveway are located within the platted road right-of-way. The turnaround has been installed within applicant’s property (Lot 19). Applicant has attempted to address the drainage problem created by the garage floor elevation being lower than the road elevation. Heit has installed a draintile at the northeast comer of the garage that eventually drains along the north si<le ol the garage and outlets just to the rear of the residence. Erosion results at the point where the draintile outlets on the earthen bank. Gustatson recommends the draintile be extended to the gentler elevations to the lakeside of the residence, suggesting that the draintile could be buried at a shallow depth. Gustafson also recommends if applicant w ishes to improve the drainage near the garage that the paving could be removed immediately adjacent to the garage doors and repaved in a more defined swale that would lead to the draintile. The Planning Commission had asked that the erosion problem along the north side ot residence be addressed with this variance request. The resolution approving the variance has been conditioned on applicant installing a draintile to the gentler and flatter elevations to the lakeside of the residence. The draintile is to be buried and the area seeded with suitable shade seed. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variance application as proposed, subject to the following conditions; 1 All existing hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction. tfM • 3. Applicant to apply for the legal combination of Lots 8 and 19 as approvals tor hardcover excesses were based on the additional area provided in the 75-250’ setback area located within Lot 19. Legal combination must be filed with the City before a building pemiit can be issued for the new improvements. The City Engineer to recommend plan for controlling erosion along north side ot residence. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MLTVICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIAISIONS 1 (B). 2 AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVTSION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2038 WHEREAS, Richard J. Heit (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1153 Elmwood Avenue within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lots 8 and 19, Skarp and Lindquist’s Femhill, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2 and Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a 10’ x 28.3 two-stor\' addition to the lakeside ot the residence to be located 9* 4" from the north side lot line where a 10’ setback is required. Construction will result in 56 s.f. of new hardcover with total hardcover proposed at 4,120 s.f. or 51% where 25% is allowed and where 4.213 s.f. or 52% exists; and an average lakeshore setback variance of 32’ where no such encroachment is allowed and where a 30 ’ encroachment exists. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, .Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2038. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17. 1995 and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following unique fmdings and hardships: Pace 1 of 6 A. B. C. E. F. The pcrccmagc of hardcover inthe 75-250’ zone will decrease 4.213 s.f. or 52% to 4.120 s.f. or 51%. The proposed addition will have no impact on the views of the lake enjoyed by the neighboring property owner. The two-story addition will extend 2" closer to the nonh side lot line. The 1 't to the immediate north is undeveloped and serves as a lake access for an owner who resides to the immediate east. The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors notified of this variance review. The residence structure to the south is located 85' fn'ii the south side lot line of the subject property. There is more than a 100 ’ separation between the Heit residence and the residence to the south. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propeny are peculiar to It and do not applv generally to other propeny in this zoning district; that granting the vari.anres would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, bv ' necessary to alleviate a demonstiable hardship or difficulty; is necessary a i^eserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keepir., with the spirit and intent ot the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan ot the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repo'-j; by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Pace 2 of 6 CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the OroiK) City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above that would permit the construction of a 10 ’ x 28 3’ two-stor>’ addition to t‘. lakeside of the residence gr.inting a 6.6% side setback variance, a hardcover variance of 2.086 s.f. or 25.6% and a .^2 ’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. • 3. Applicant to have completed the filing of the legal combination ot Lots 8 and 19 before a building permit can issued by City for new residential construction. All existing hardcover improvements scheduled for removal as shown on Page 6 of thi.*- resolution shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. The draintilc that carries drainage along nonh side of property to the west shall be extended to flatter elevations to lakeside of residence. Drainiile to be buried and disturbed area seeded with a mixture recommended for shaded area.s. Authorities granted with this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance Will expire on that date (August 14, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the tenns of this resolution and on behalf of hunself, his heirs, successors and assigns, herebv agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the m property. Page 3 of 6 ( Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on tte 14th day of August, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 ia.' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public .viihin and for said county, personally appeartd ---------------------------------------------------------------— known to me to be che person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instruiiient.and acknowledged that he ithey) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. kr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this NOTARY PUBLIC dav of___________________me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _____________________________^----^------------—- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrumcnt.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Pace 5 of 6 t.'.vir i ‘Ti| j\ A . 1 ti '-i . • J |l ■; !, •: ;i r* ll;i • ELM'WOOO 50.60 ' 01 t)A(ni*^i— qavenue • -•'■• < r :— i , * * ' i » * * • ‘i ' \ ’ . : *. •.. - X •*I • • ^ , .*-0» • • • I ••*.» ^ • w • . y.. * o «• • • • i •• . ’ :t' v- 'T'\ ■ • * \ W , * • • * ^1 .u** .LotLot•Tot a•>liS'l Page 6 of 6 i! r w» a To:Chaif Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, Cit\’ Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building <& Zoning Administrator Itoe:July 6, 1995 Subject: #2033 Richard Heit. 1153 Elmwood Avenue - Variances - PubLk Hearing Zming Dislrkt: LR-IB Total lot area « 16,772 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Allowed - 2.516 s.f. or 15^ E.xisting * 1.S40 s.f. or 10.9% Proposed = 1,897 s.f. or 11.3% No variances required. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review ot hardcover. 0-75 ’ setback area = 4.036 s.t. Allowed - 0 Existing = 121 s.f. or 3% Proposed = 121 s f. or 3% (3% approved in 1988 variance review) 75-250’ setback area = S.137 s.f. (in 1988 review. 8.325 s.f. area was recorded) Allowed = 2.034 s.f. or 25% E.xisting = 4.213 s.f. or 52% (1988-45.5% based on adjusted area) Proposed = 4.120 s.f. or 51% Variance = 2.086 s.f. or 25.6% (existing variance = 2.179 s.f. or 26 7%) Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) Required = 10 ’ Existing = 9’ 6" Proposed = 9’ 4" Variance = 6" or 5% ^1' - Side vard setback. Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) Allowed = 0 Existing = 30 ’ Proposed = 32’ - Average lakcshore setback. Zoning FUc #2038 July 6. 1995 P»ge2 Ust of Exhibits A - Application B • Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Hardcover Inventory 75-250 ’ Setback Area E - Lakeside Elevation F-1-2 Floor Plans for Two-Stor^’ Addition G - Location Map (will assist members in locating rather secluded property) H-1-7 Resolution Plus Exhibits for Application #1272 Appnned by City 6/13/88 I - New Survey/Siic Plan Description of Request Applicant proposes a two-story 10' x 28.3 ’ addition to the lakeside of the e.xisiimt residence. The structure will replace an existing grade-level screened porch and upper level deck at 8’ x 28.3 ’. The new addition will extend 2 ’ closer to the lake but will be located out of the 75’ setback area. There already exists a 30’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed addition wduld now' extend 2 ’ beyond. Review E.xhibits B and I, the property to the immediate north is a vacant lot. The average lakeshore setback has been determined from the residence structure on the second lot to the north. Hardcover exists at 52%. To offset the 2 ’ x 28.3 ’ expansion, applicant proposes the removal of 153 s.f. of plastic liner beneath landscape area to the nonh side of the resider ce. Refer to Exhibit 1. The addition will also extend 2" further into the substandard north side yard proposed at 9’ 4". Review Exhibit H-1-7. In 1988. the City granted hardcover and side setback variances for a partial second story expansion. A condition of that approval held that hardcover must be maintained at 44.5%. this percentage has been adjusted to account for the reduction in area within the 75-250 ’ setback area (now at 45.5%). Review individual hardcover improvements - those noted in the 1988 review. Exhibit H-3. and improvements set forth in the current hardcover inventory. Exhibit D. In 1988 bituminous paving was recorded at 840 s.f. The current application shows it a* 1.049 s.f. There is no new bituminous paving on this property since 1988. Staff will provide a copy of the 1988 sursey for comparison at the meeting. The landscape areas underlain with plastic in 1988 were recorded at 413 s.f. In 1995 it exists at 722 s.f. Review the specific areas on the property , staff found no new landscaping nor bituminous paving. Staff would suggest that the current recorded hardcover inventory is in greater detail than the 1988 review. Review Exhibit I. the gravel area shown to the north of the garage was specifically noted in 1988 as non-hardcover because it was not driven over. Members will observe that there is an informal access drive to the undeveloped lot to the immediate north, probably used by owner who lives to tiie east side of Elmwood seeking access to his lakeshore lot. Refer to Exhibit G. Mr. Beiio's property is located on the staff map. You may find this exhibit useful in locating the property as roadway locations become very' confusing in this area of the City. Zoning File #2038 July 6. 1995 Page 3 StMcfficfit of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A. Staff would add the following 1.Steep topographies to the south and east of the propert>- and the existing .nature vegetation minimize any visual impact upon the lakevicws of the residence to the immediate south There is no residence on the vacant lot to the north. The residence on second lot to north has no bearing on average lakeshore setback determination. 3.The steep elevations of this property create special needs for residential users. The steep topographies also pose drainage and erosion problems. Issues for Consideration 1.Applicant proposes 153 s.f. or 1% reduction in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area. Are there other improvements on this property that can be removed without creating additional erosion problems.’ Members should review the north side of the residence and the erosion that is taking place on both this property and the propeny to the north. The northwest comer of the existing structure is located 9’ 6" from the side lot line. Should the new addition be constructed so to meet the 10' required setback.’ The best way to view the lakeshore of this property is to approach the residence from the nonh side rather than the south side as staff was soon to discover. Options of .-\ction To deny, approve or amend the current proposed variance application for the property located at 1153 Elmwood Avenue. Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: 1.All existinc hardcover improvements required for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. Applicant to apply for the legal combination of Lois 8 and 19 as approvals for hardcover e.xcesses were based on the additional area provided in the 75-250’ setback area located within Lot 19. Isv rr CITY OF ORONO - A'ARLVNCE APPLICA'^^ Initial Application Fes S200.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) ^ j Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no change from original application) Variance for non-coniorming structures *-00. After-the-Fac: Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFOR>L\TiqN ^^ a ,c -Site Address. //■='’ ^LtlyCc. 0> 4 I ^ ' r 4 w w a Propertv Identification .Number (P.I.D.)------■ , . , n-'miired sun^ AttKh ‘lejal description to application it not included on required Date Property Acquired_______________;----—-------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels ot . Present use of property; X _residential -----^ Zoning District: ; Z .* A wC 1 rr.* a w - Vte VV'V vv (mon^ycar)2£.V ta*VV'» • • % V V' « . .• wvI k. ufc.a< f _ ’J’ 7’----K' A ' I V * t m - >K. applicant ^? , - V Name Address: '.1^5 Phone ihnmel ^ ---- Pht^neiwork) 4^ ^ ^----- ?jT;r~,v.d.,vcL _^zip-._sAAi^f OWNER (if different than applicant) Name____ ----------- Phonahome) Phone (work)_ Address;Citv:Zip: a/ description OF REQLXST Esti^tcdCot^t^gonCos^S ^ ^ Describe request indeuil: . _ Q.,.viaO ^ >7._r------------------ ri________________ _________________________________ (attach additional sheets it necessaiy) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: Lot Width Front ^ Side ^ Hardcover ___Eoi Coverage Rear )( Average Lakeshore Other (specify) compliance .ttb Zo.^, V- ► . ytA' i_L “ ^ f -----—(anach additional sheets if necessan') REQUIRED SUBSirrTALS A,. ,h. infnm,«inn m-st b« n,h.T.itte^ h« the appMcn.ion »^dliw in for vour application to b<? considered complet e — of owners w.rhm 150’ (you must obmin Oris list from Hennepin Countv Depanment of Finance, A-60:>, Govt Center. j48o2/l). calculations as required. Li addition, provide one ) p. SapMcsursev (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existmg grade — S^ropLd. In addttton. provide c.te ,U copy 3',r x ll' for Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 ,d x 11 1 ----List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the — p o' ™ Tins would include nameis) of applicaiitis) if not current owner(s). _ ASTn?ddendum to this application, please anach a separate list ot any other persons vou wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City statt. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please a-member that ymir unnlicniiim is not com nleie if the ahiiyejnjarmalion has not heeajncludeiL I \nnlicam must have all submittals into the City offices 23 days before the Planning Coi^ission M.P n. Planmne Commission Meetmgs are held on the third Monday ot each month. A* i^nnts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission ^"^11 if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meettng. please make “have an aulhorized^ent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office ot tliis change prior to the meeting. I )\ 4 (P01 ) -i. V (ipi / / / / (?I5) • • •• V.>Vrr ? ; ■.U_!i' S < R4 T ^ Efr tJ • |AY^ (66) \ ________P*V— '6'.5 \ \ h » . —-X »---\ L ^ i f ' ^^11 y I eC .‘s’ . — PH VoilnU^531 5 '63 56) •/ '* ^»*C7-i*-49 umei L* (15) 55TJ»*C 4-».,3 ^ i-ty? <;tbii. »,..t,,T.v-^ , ^ r' . . '* ------- ■ -. —j A V ► I 1 % « \ (^3) f ~ r\ 7 (5^) 'S> ^ ^—- - ^>(65) ^ :ti i- 'f ?'0 p __* kf ■*• 3' 1 tf| -*.(?7 > ■» r‘‘(^e)r !3‘ (?9i V ',. 'f (30) -r >7? \ I I « I \ ^ ’*(59), e '* i?f A ‘ v'v; X fLsii:::: >* *'• n—■ ; (14) .' f «• / (55) ? LOMA . 40 ' ‘ ' > r.« '' / ^ 30in) 1 ;- SO' i 1:* »i in If); ^'i 1 1 1 3C‘ 33,33; '> i:;q 'S< 3 ^ LINDft tm » ^ ‘OV ^4’ 5 S^' * sCi^Tfi >-4 »VK j) ’M.5 »KK I COC NO :(6^)i pj l> 7 \ 1 ✓ s'1 »90 s 2 ' P ■>*65 VAC 'i’-.’-54 Pi - ■« t 0 (5)h •*.»'3B \V mm MTE oi/f i/wMTCM S04PW AOM CMCR HAM TAXPAYCft NAM/AOM M 07*117*23 IS 021<S OOOSi ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MItSPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY Of ORONO FLOOD CONTROL lUMER KATERI t/f/tt ST DEED •I611AO NEItCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORrUTION SYSTEM PMPERTY OHNERS LISTSa 07-117-23 lA 0016 ooosa ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF OROKO PO DOX 66 CRYSTAL DAY HN S5SSR REPORT NO. PI6SS601 PAGE 17ID 07-117-2S 14 0021 OllOl ELMNOOO AYE HIUIAM R HIDDS HILLIAH R NIMS 1101 itrMlOO AVC OUHO MN S5364 PROP ADOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAM/AOOR PROP AODR OMER NAM TA>9AYER NAM/ADOR PROP ADDR Oi«€R NAM TiOsPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AODR WNER NAM TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR Si 07-117-2S 14 0026 011S7 ELMNOOO AVE NANS 0 NEILER ETAL EHILIC E NEILER 1IS5 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN S5S64 ID 07-117-2S 14 0024 01161 EUPiOOO AVE D E A R R 6ARL0CK BRUCE E 6ARL0CK 1174 ELMNOOO AV HOUND Itl SSS64 SB 07-117-23 14 0034 0003D ADDRESS UUSSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/D/D2 ST DEED 161147 38 07-117-23 14 0052 01151 NORTH ARM jR R A RUTZ ETAL MARTHA KUTZ 14113 CLENRIDGE RD MINMTONKA MN 55345 3D 07-117-23 14 a#^27 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO CARY E BEITO ETA^ TODD VAN DEN EINOE 1164 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN S5364 38 07-117-23 14 0030 01174 ELFDOOO AVE B E GlRLvXR t R R OARLOCK BRUCE GARLOCK 1174 ELFPEXX) AVE HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 8 E 1 R R GARLOCK BRUCE GARLOCK 1174 ELHHOOO AV MOUND MN 5S364 38 07-117-23 14 0054 01174 NORTH ARM DR SCOTT L CHRISTIANSON ET At SCOTT L CHRISTIANSON A DAMN H CHRISTIANSON 1174 NOniH ARM DR MOUND MTT 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0028 01153 ELMNOOO AVE RICHARD JAMES HEIT RICHARD JAMS NEXT 1153 ELMNOOO AVE HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0033 01180 ELMNOOO AVE J H LAMBRECHT ET AL JON H LAMBRECHT IIBO ELMNOOO AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-11/-23 14 0037 01153 ELFMX)0 AVE RICHARD JAMES HEIT RICHARD JAMES HEIT 1153 ELMNOOO AVE MOUND Ft4 55364 36 07-117-23 14 0054 01144 lUUQOO AVE J 1 E NAnVEY J SCOT HARVEY 1144 ELMNOOO HOUND MN 55364 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 07-117-23 14 0060 01164 fKTRTH ARM DR IJOD M VAN DEN EINDE ET AL TODD M VAN DEN EINDE 1164 N ARM OR HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0063 01121 ELr>ifs J avE JAMES DESr aER JAMES DE«*'.INTER 1121 ELMNOOO AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0064 01135 NORTH ARK DR E E NEILER IRS MEERKIM EMILIE E MILER 1135 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 mN MTf QUtl/n^ n *4^.•; f. I' iATCIf S04•' . f•»(MCR NAfC TAKPAYIR NAME/AOOR ’f . t • ”, ♦ : \> • *. MENNEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PR«»ERTY QHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S540I PA6S la • e ‘ t> .S8 07>117>2S M 00A5 outs NORTH ARH OR DAVID J A VALERIE J PETERSEN DAVID J A VALERIE J PETERSEN HAS NORTH ARH OR HOUND m 553A4' ».•*’•;. ^'' • • TOTAL DATCH 50A 00019 I 00 f-'3 '■J I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLE06E AND BELIEF. DATE cnr>s • •. • * H t SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 hardcover calculation worksheet 250-500 ’ EXISTING h ardcover IN ZONE A. House _____________ Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ______________ - B . jPROPOSED HARDCOVT.R IN ZONE A. House ______________ ^ Length X X X \ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain ByPlaslic ^ cl X X X X X X X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE —N 7^250 ’ ; Widdi X 100 = Width a 75^ 2JI 3 SSCr ivVi 51 1 SOO'lOOO’ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ;__S.F. ___S.F. .5^ % ^ B .X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. % c/0 ; ./ A 'o O •** S.F. '• ■-)•\ / A ^ . B 4 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A B . ^* -*-^4:. ^" -kt' ■ - - ■ •■ ' 2^1 ^ ■fH • ji ;fT?X«Aw»>''''>C*‘'QO \u LIVING AREA 1207 sqft BASEMENT 4W 2056 CSMT 6*0 X 6*8" Slider IQ «> CQ C o c 1/1 0)c SLAB CQ 01x: PORCH 0>x: T3 C 0) 1< LU 4W 2056 CSMT 6’0 SPA a. . •«»•..<•«* ..t- * 13'4 134 I < ' I 5’1 5’5 14'8 5--... (-.1i A V f, iV / I ) I ) 'n 1 murphy BROS. Building 4 Rtmodeling Co. 2579 Eastmon Drive 3W 2056( o» I l ' *' I i - I C^MT ) W ! in • «* V V* t ni^ >L/ 13'4 14'8 28'1\ MURPHY BROS. LIVING AREA 1073 sqft Duiiding & Remodeling Co. - - •25/9 Eastman Drivo NEW DRIGHTON, MN 55112 (612) 780-3262 • #• 9 * ' > ;• • ^ t • • \ • ■*• • * *"1 • r • •f'-. ^•r V:. 5 1^1 I'] •r.. «r ^ • •^- .■>■'•:.• i'C- .1 ■.' f*-.-- '. . ...jK...-- - .: ■., , ,. , . , • •» •- , » •*•••#■•'*, ‘V f ^ ' '* / • »«%•« * .. ^ ; V • ".• • >- < ,ra r ; . • ^ . I/-•■ f H * •• •/;■ •/ • / \ r V ORONQ City of OROIVO «U0UUTI0»I Of TMt CITY COUNCIL W). ?«4S A VAAIMKB TO____mncxTAL sonao com •KTXom 10.22, MBMVISZM 2 JUm cacnM 10.24, momozM s(o) - nu 41272 •■BMAO, XlcharO J. Bait (haralaaftar •tha applicant”) la «t 1153 Blaaoed Avanua i^lthin tha City «f Orooo (barainaftar City”) and laBally daaeribad as followai ^ tindqulsta rarnhill, aceordina to 5 J'^***. tharaof, lannapin County, Mlnnatota(harainattar 'tha proparty”)i and "i.nn..ora w i aiBBBAf, tha applicant has appliad to tha city for a 10V4*"falk!lvirifB*?fai**"^“’ Oactlona 10.22, Subdivision 2 andparalt tha construction of a sacond story coaprlsa additional structural hardcovar in axeass of tha 23% hardcovar noraally allowad in tha 73-250* lakashora aaehark Klnnasot.,"®**' ■« XT U8OLTB0 by th. City Council of orono, rznzKS 1. This application was raviavad as Zoninq flla 41272. mIv Ts* ?«??® Hfnnlnq Coaaisslon raviavad this application on faqa 1 of 5 ':Cr.*.T 4 a”«S**^*^*” *♦ V. , ■ : . • * _ a. , at ' ^ • *. a. ‘ . “ •i . i-r •..TtlVXW ■ 1' vrK' ■ii-: ■■ • 4. i rA.,>v,-%,-u -^4- ' ^ -r . »* f » ^ I- « f r« » TT •, . •» 1 ■ • .Of-.' / / ' a •/’ % '*■ - ..a . • . ► V. 4.# V - > a • . . -. r " • ^ -III I I • •* ' 1 ; r. •‘: •n • > f«• • ' ’V• ' #»-##' X? << •• -. •'r.‘'>v*r».^»»?..^ V . . ^ i_. • ' .iV / V ■s;-,. ■:<- *• 0 I . ■'!'.,-';r^-:*.5V.. •I -L -I”/.' ' r-^'.-:. :vr-: v: V . K ; rVj - V ,v*.Hfc'; *»*J kit't#IP?'i.-,- 1 • * *IT- • ■ » , < 'I cirv 1 ORONO City of ORONOnisoLuriOH of thi city councilNO, ________c) Thm proposed cantllavar^d addition vi'l bm locatad l.d* froa tha aida lot lina with a 2* ovar hang, but will ba no cloaar to that lot lina than tha aaiating covarad wa!kway atructura attachad to tha houaa, and will hava no iapact on tha naighboring raaidanca which ia sora than 50* away* 4. Tha City Council haa conaidarad thia application including tha findinga and racouandationa of tha Planning Couiaaion, raporta by City ataff, coo::<inta by tha applicant and tha affact of tha propoaad varianca on tha haa 1th, aafaty and walfara of tha eoMunity. 5. Tha City Council finda that tha conditiona axiating on thia proparty ara paculiar to it and do not apply ganarally to othar proparty in thia zoning diatrict; that granting tha varianca would not advaraaly affact traffic conditiona, light, air nor poaa a fira hazard or othar dangar tc naighboring proparty; would not naraly aarva aa a convanianca to tha applicant, but ia nacaaaary to allaviata a danonatrabla hardship or difficulty; ia nacaaaary to praaarva a substantial proparty riaht of tha applicant; and would ba in kaaping with tha spirit and intant of tha Zoning Coda and Coaprahanaiva Plan of tha City* ooMUdzosi, oumm amd camnnamB Pa a ad upon tha abova findinga# tha Orono City Council haraby grants a varianca to tha Municipal Zoning Coda factions 10*22# Subdivision 2 and 10*24, Subdivision 5(B) to parmit tha construction of a aacond story addition to ba locatad 1*4* froa tha aida lot lino .- i; with ovarhang locatad 4.S* from tha aida lot lina, whara a 10* aida yard aatback ia noraally raquirad, and grants a varianca to allow 44*5i hardcovar in tha 75*250* aatback zona whara only 251 hardcovar v ia noraally allowad, subjact to tha following conditions; • >• - *♦ 1* Hardcovar on tha proparty ia allowad only aa follows; . w>" V • U t 4 •• , • ' 0 'W' ? -I 1-0 Pt V;-CT- • -• y > ,* i' v.«. -•1 t ' A-t'' t 0*>75* Zonal (Araa - 3,975 a*f.) rxiating atapping atonaa Caapfira ring/plaatic undarlay TOTAL ALLOffED 20 a*f* 100 a.f*Tirmr o.od Faga 2 of 5 I- •A S. V-^/ / ,sX • l:’’*‘ r. ■0. 1 f - A a TV City of ORONO MCSOLUTIOM 0^ THI CITY COUNCIC WQ. __3A<5 _______ u ^ •- *■ -A. V ORONO 7S-1S0* toift (Atm ■ IjJas ».f.) Cxiatin^ hous« Exlsti09 deck Csiaciiw shAd Reckbada/plastle alesf watt wall ot hooM« with 3* eaatilavar abev* Covarad walkway with eaatllavar abewa portion CxlatlB9 yaraoa katalnlny walls/plaatle Sraval/plastle naxt to walkway by paramo Portion of proparty In flawood rlyht'Of'way that la aalntalnad by Applicant aa hia drlvaway TOTAl, ALLOWED I. ■' - . I- ->v',•' '« ,-v •», I 1.2S4 a.f. a.f. S« a.f. 113 a.f. 321 a.f. Sl« 230 100 a.f. a.f. a.f. •40 a.f. 3.703 a.r. (44.5t» Applicant la haraby adviaad that no additional hardcovar will ba approvad for thia property, and any future propoaal to incraaaa hardcovar on tha proparty would not ba approvad. but oi^ht ba approvad only in conjunction with raaoval of an aquivalant araa of oxiatinq hardcovar. raaultinq in no not hardcovar incraaaa on tha proparty. 2. foparata kitchan facilitiaa ahall net ba conatruetad to aaka thia a aaparata quaat apartaant without conditional uaa pornit approval by tha City Council. Tha houaa and addition ahall continue to function aa a ainqlo dwallinq unit. 3. Autheritioa qrantad by thia varianca run with tha property net with tha applicant, bat are poraiaaiva only and aoat bo •xarclaad by application for a bulldinq parait within one year of * the data of Council approval, or thia varianca will expire on that data (June 13. 1M9). 4. Violation of or nen-eeaplianea with any of tha taraa and conditiona of thia variance ahall conatitute a violation of the zonlnq coda, ahall autooatically taralnata any authority granted herein, and ahall ba puniahabla aa a xiadaaaanor. 5. Tha undaralgnad applicant haa road, undaratoed and haraby agraaa to tha totaa of thin raaelution and on behalf of hioaalf. hla haira. auccaaaora and aaaigna. haraby agraaa to tha recording of thia raaolutlon in tha chain of title of tha property. faga 3 of 9 ^ . • A'- mm ^ «4 \ V d a TTT7 -w »• ^. * X ' • * / r."- rjfe ^ \ P;^ tr* **• > • ••rf • -•k/. ^•;- V » n »• t • * m-■V'\:ti‘/ __-• > 3 ’I -. r -?• * >r ! I CITY OROTftTOl city of ORONO RCSOLUTION Of THI CITY COUMCl L MO. 2«S *> «»* 'S. A4ept«4 by th« Oreao City Ceuaell oa this 19th day of ;iiaaai IfM. thy N. palia, city Cl< Froparty Owaapfs) >« ik V I • •„ ■t^V 4 ,V' ' v« ✓ \ p* • » > Fafs 4 of 9 ' v^ i '-T t •» ' r \ •f»V V-vV « 'ol ••* •^•' *Sa v^ii<Viyiji,*-'.4i<i^ « i* #* .r a « /• /••/ • • .^V. ..-r/rv*^’'' :: -r,. V .♦ > . • • A.--- .v.v' ‘ V»‘‘.V ^ ** 1' ^T• . • ' I - ■ 2J Kv 0§'r• • • *4-V i Vi t v' ; 5. V —.r*. ^ {.*.• A •/'.rr ?2 • •. 'f . • •• • -iV*^ . J * <• ^ ■:• U ' ;i:'/ . ***,<' * ,* • • •. i 'V T j V •, ' . • 'r’V^ i.-Si- rai M Liin=L 1 1 1 ) t 8eFo«t » ’ • tj • • \* ^ ;W- •«'.'•/ .•,.•• •V *-^ -£ *v • I mV P; % • LM~ rr"-----L-P^II 1 : I 1 A-•- ‘•* % .* •f r \ V • « } i *r r /fpre< • • * •.« • • J* VI * .“• '■\r •••I* V ^ '* ^ \ X- i.t j r ti ' -L »o.i. .‘I 4 .- •. ■ A ti i’■' • mm '<7^?4^cr.*jw^7 V ^.?l :• • I .• .■J *.V•*.vV, • ^ . V • »4 Vv‘'t'- y. * -y , ’'>r ‘. \ r « • Vt ^ - X5* «\ . ' •»;, -.‘rjv'vH.' ,<f • V. I ‘ * •»I r'.vV-:-;^. • , V - •. • t. ;V*' ■* .t * % /■ ■'•V' • •'A-m'mA % .» r V. -j » V 4* '^ ^ #■ ^ i Bonestroo Rdsene Anderlik& |\]| Associates Engineers & Architects Asuk jim me % : fei«« JHparR<wv 1 July 27, 1995 Ono vi 3 Pt f.Sr-jni Ga9« »C tttnwrt * n ** OoKOOT'. n ^ M.<»ard 9 Pf iP*-y 0 ®f Ckxja’*« * j. rnma •€T*v*'ar<j A *f O iasKotA Cer *«0 Oiry»#» pf ^a®e'? C * ; .*’ Pr. ^•.A<l G A Pf A .Hi«r P ®l viaNi A Gary A ^gnr^en Pf Oat O Povuta Pf V tD#* ^ CP*%hc*vir< f PE ; jAnnon A; ^ • . ..>0 ^ * e«l T - t y' P * * ** 5 ; % A P€M M.w i>f OorvMi C Bijfqg'a:V htire* A f A V**Ao w Mnm^s Pf iro M » ‘^sny c i ^‘A e* 9 c»|Kflf <«n V 0 %or i,*r te- •?~ =C .!• -P Agnes M P<ng Vhcfvn * ?1. V-er^'-■gme-s f Engeevwn 'r>om^ A •rra'i-'*C *t. -£ Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bav, -Minnesota 55323 \\5\-S 1 '*? Re; Heit Residence File No. 139-2038 Dear Jeanne, We have inspected the minor erosion along the north side of the Richard Heit residence on Elmwood Avenue on the east side of Forest Lake. The garage floor is several teet below Elmwood Avenue and the driveway slopes down from the street. The drainage from the street is not more than should be e,xpected in such a circumstance. An existing draintile line on the property collects the drainage and carries it west along the north side of the house and outlets some distance from the lake. Tlie erosion is created where the draintile outlets on a steep slope. If the draintile line is extended down to flatter slopes the erosion would be minimal. The draintile could be buried at a minimal depth and the disturbed area should be seeded with a mixture recommended for shaded areas. An alternative would be to place riprap at the outici to break up the flow and reduce velocities, however, this option would be less effective. The drainage on the diiveway near the garage floor could be improved by removing a portion of the pavement and repaving a better swale leading to the draintile. This certainly A * • ^ ^ is not neces.sar\' but could improve the situation if desired. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very' truly, BONES! ROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. /iL., Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 ll REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % ■'s’ ''X DATE: August 7, 1995 J^ If V ITEM NO.: Departmoit Approval: Nmbc Itasmt A. Mabusth Thk Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2040 Doug Olson, 2601 West Lafayette Road - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Total lot area * 60,000+. Pertinent Ordinances A.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback Required = 75’ Existing = 24’ Proposed = 24’ Variance = 51’ or 6%% B.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area. 0-75 ’ setback area = 33,750 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 2,992.69 s.f. or 8.86% Proposed = 2,757.69 s.f. or 8.1% (-170 s.f. patio, -65 s.f. concrete patio) Brief Description of Request The application involves lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for the replacement of a concrete patio that surrounds a pool entirely liKated within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Refer to Exhibits F and I. the concrete paving will be replaced with interlocking pavers placed within a sand bed. Applicant proposes a reduction of approximately 170 s.f. of the original concrete patio area that will be replaced with grass. 65 s.f. of concrete stepping pad shall also be removed at the lakeside adjacent to entrance of lakeshore dock at east shoreline. Plannina Commission members felt the hardcover removals were modest and asked applicant to consider additional removals, specifically removal of the remaining stepping pads within the lakeshore yard. Applicant s contractor noted a 15’ x 15’ boathouse had already been removed in addition to other stepping pads adjacent to lake that provided access to the peninsula at the north shoreline. The shoreline has been riprapped within the last year and the hillside alon*’ the lake has been planted. Plastic underliners beneath landscape areas have been removed. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 August 7. 1995 Zoning File #2040 Members iK}ted extensive paving in street yard. The contractor advised that Dr. Olson has owned the property for just a year and is not owner's prime residence. It is the owner s plan to remodel and expand existing residence next year. It is Dr. Olson s intention to reduce all unnecessary hardcover w ithin the 75-250’ setback area as has been accomplished in the 0-75 setback area. Planning Commission advised that at the time applicant presents plans for complete restoration of the residence located within the 75-250’ setback area, that applicant w ill be expected to consider extensive removals of hardcover pavings within the street yard. Planning Commission Recommendation Three of the four members of the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as propt>sed. The minority opinion telt that approval should have been based on removal of additional stepping pads within the lakeshore protected area. This approval was conditioned on the following; 1.AH hardcover improvements scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City. Applicant is advised that at the time applicant proposes future improvement to the residence structure located within the 75-250’ setback area that applicant shall be expected to consider extensive removals of the paved area within the street yard. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either deny, approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution I A RESOLLTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDI\ ISION 1 (A) AND 2 FILE NO. 2040 MMEREAS, Douglas J. Olson (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2601 West Lafayette Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows. Tracts C and F, R.L.S. No. 131, Files of Registrar of Titles. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivisions 1 (A) and 2 to permit the installation of a new patio area adjacent to a pool entirely located within the 0-75 setback area that wilt be located 24 from the shoreline where a 75’ setback is required and where the existing patio is located 24’, the patio shall be installed with interlocking pavers placed in a sand bed resulting in 1.046 s.f. of hardcover where 1.216 s.f. exists and where none is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. .Minnesota; FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2040. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 60,(X)0± s.f. or 1.37 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17. 1995 and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Over 50/o of the area of this property is Utcated within the 0-75’ setback area. B. The house and improvements were constructed prior to current standards for lakeshore development. Page 1 of 4 C. The property has over 800 liocal feet of shoreline. D. The concrete patio area shall be replaced with interlocking pavera placed in sand bed that will provide increased absorption by runoff. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions c.xisting on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property' in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary’ to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Cixle and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more (’>f the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions I (A) and 2 to permit the installation of a patio of interlocking pavers at 1.04o s.f. adjacent to pool located within lakeshore protected area that will result in total hardcover of 2.757.69 s.f. or 8.1% where 2,992.69 s.f. or 8.86% e.xisted and a lakeshore setback variance of 51 ’ or 68%, subject to thi following conditions: 1 . All hardcover improvements scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the City issuing a building permit for the installation of a replacement patio. Applicant's contractor to call for a site inspection to confirm the required removals. 2. Applicant is placed on notice that at the time applicant files for a future variance application for improvements to the e.xisting residence located within the 75-250 ’ setback area, applicant will be expected to consider e.xtensive paving removals in street yard of property. Page 2 of 4 r 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14, 1996). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, uiKlerstood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the properu’. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of August. 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ilallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Propeny Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of Aucust 1995 bv Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorolhy M. Hallin. Mayor and Ciiy Ckrk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instniment was executed on behalt of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator D^e: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 7, 1995 - Lakeshore setback Subject: #2040 Doug Olson. 2601 West Lafayene Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR IB Total lot area = bO.OOOJi iPeriinent Ordinances A. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) Required * 75’ Existing = 24’ Proposed = 24’ Variance = 51’ or 68% B. Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. 0-75’ setback area = 33.750 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 2,992.69 s.f. or 8.86% Proposed = 2,757.69 s.f. or 8.1% (-170 s.f. patio, -65 s.f. concrete pads) List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - Application Plat .Map Property Owners’ List Neighbor’s Acknowledgement Form Hardcover Inventory Hardcover Map Topographic Map Lakeshore Protected Area Survev Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for replacement of a concrete patio that surrounds a pool located within the 0-75’ setback area. Applicant proposes to replace concrete paving with interlocking pavers placed within a sand bed. As applicant ’s information notes. Exhibit A. the DNR classifies the interlocking pavers placed within sand beds to he "soft cover". The application involves modest reductions in existing hardcover improvements. Refer to E.xhibit F, the patio area shall be reduced by 170 s.f. and 65 s.f. of concrete pads shall be removed at lakeside. w Zoning File #2040 July 7, 1995 Page 2 Members may remember an earlier application in 1994 involving the same propert>'. In that application, applicant sought to install new improvements involving replacement of the retaining walls and a hot tub adjacent to the pool area. This application was never completed. Review Exhibit I. staff has asked that applicant provide an amended sur\ey confirming location of patio area to lakeshore. The patio at its closest projection to lake is 24 from lake. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A. Staff would add the following: 1.Over 50% of the area of this property is located within the 0-75’ setback area Refer to Exhibit J. 2.The house and improvements were constructed prior to current standards for lakeshore development. 3. Review E.\hibit J, the property’ has over 800 lineal feet of shoreline. Issues for Consideration 1.Hardcover has been reduced to 8.1% in the 0-75’ setback area. Will members approve the improvement within the 0-75’ setback area without additional removals? 2. Other issues. Options for Action 1. To either approve as proposed, or 2. To approve as amended. ■i. •i/C cm' OF OROKO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ ^ 0 Site Address :iUo\ O-egJ h ^ /I A r u ' W»?W V 4 ^ • I * » -\V- • u,*w Property Identification Number (P I P ) ---------------------^—_ Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur\'ey. Date Property Acquired 4 - A - .'i/- (month/y.ar) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ^ residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: R »» ___________________________ APPLIC.ANT Name Or Address: OWNER Of different than applicant) Name PhoneOiome) Phone(work) ISO Ciw: _______Zip:_, Phonet home) *i ^ i ♦ ^ 5St» Phone (work)_9toj^3vt^ Address: t^o > DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Citv:Zip: .SS3>^l Estimated Construction Cost $ ft^ooQ (attach additional she VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ___Other (specify) 0"TS* Q(mcAA.\t. Jla/moO^ ^ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF U2SXSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ‘Oesenbe undue hardship or practical difliculty or unusualDesenbe unaue narasmp ui pia«.uv.ai x.. compliance with Zoning Code requirements: rO(U/«\T<mttrixC<- ^ CLfrYUfLAijK—Pft 0 ■CtfV<A 1 Pn>aw>, AV vji - XMOR Ccyfxrs . (attach additional sheets if necessary) Frr 06/27/95 i^t24 c:tv or oRCNO si2 -473-7337 00] REQUIRED SUB^f^T^Ti: AJI of thg fOllQWlna tnfoimatlfln Ftiut ^^ihmltfd br th« apnllcati«m flftMriUna A^ti. i,f to be 4ffliialdcrcii_coiiipict'ii 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. . Con&pletcd Application Form _ Certified Property Owuen List wf V'^ners within ISO' (you must obtain thJs list ftoia Hennepin County Depaitnicnt of Plnatica, A-OOO, Ocvt Center, 348-3271), _ Plat Map (obtained with property O’^non list). _ Certlflcttu; of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and inelude hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8V4" x 11** for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and propetad elevations) if dny changes in existing grade ’ are proposed. In addition, provide ons (1) copy 8V4" x 11" for reproduction. _ Sketches or plans of floor A elevMi^n views (provide one (J) copy SV^" x 11"). ^ List of the legal names (Include marltc t status) of all persons with an interest in die property. Tl^s would include narneCs) of appllcant(s) if not uuucm owuci(i). As an addendum to this application, please aiucli a sepataie Itsi of any other persons , you wisii noliHed of ihU spplioaliun. Additional liems as may be rc4ucnicd by City staff. 'llie Applicant and Property Owner must sign ttiis application. Please lemembrr Umt vour variance uppllcailon la not complete If the above liiformatfon has not been Included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The apnllcaiu hereby agrees lo provide all Infoimatlon required or requested by the Zoning: Adamiiatrator, agrees to pay additional fees (jtaff time tiot coerefl by original fee payment) end/or consullam expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that tlie infomtation supplied is Uuc/tiid coitc^l iq Utc Inst ufliis/hcr knowledgef // A Applicant's SIgnatura '/M Dat<C^aOWNER’S SIGNATURE Tlie owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to thin appllcHtlon and fuiUier authurUcs leanooable entry unto (lie property by City staff, consultants, agemi, Commissioa metnbers, and Council mciiibera for puiposes uf inveatlgailua and vetlflwuilon of iliis request. Owner's Signature ^^7^ 199.^ Applicai:' must aave all submilials Into the City offices 25 days bcfor^dio Planning CommisMiua Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings ate held on the Uiird Monday uf each munlli. Applicants mutt be preseot at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cunuiiissluu and Council. If an applicant Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to liiivc an audioiired ageut anend In your plaue <nid to advise Uie Building A Zoning Office uf tills cliauge pilor to tlie meeting. L ;iuH MTi mni/n /; • ‘^ '■■ MTOI Ml ' 'PMP AfiM ' IMNil NAM TAMAVEt » H IWC/AMI • .c^ • # *1 » raOF Mwif •f:M tl-117-tS n OMl MAM NUT UrAYETTI M UMJM C nOSKE UUU t AIOSU tAM NUT UFAYETTE U ENCBLSXm HN ASSSl MItCnM CaMTT raOMETT XNFOmATXON'SYSrEfi raOKRTY QMCU LIST » J TAXPAYER . NAM/AOM lA EI-U7*tS tl 0U7 OEAW NEST LAFAYETTE U •RAOFORO L BLAMENSHIF ■RAOFORO A QEMA BLAMIENSHXR SAM M8T LAFAYETTE RO . EXCELSIOR m 55m U tl-117-7S n OMt 92A00 NEST LAFAYETTE RO AM4 NATTHENS ANN NATTHENS tAOO NEST LAFAYETTE M EXCELSIOR m 55m 38 21-117-tS 24 0043 02AI0 NEST LAFAYETTE R0 CYNTHIA N ENCQUIST CYNTHIA N ENBOUIST 2410 LAFAYETTE RO N EXCELSIOR rt4 55331 liERdRT NO. FI43i48l FACE t ' 4 •1% zi ooos02M1 NEST UTAYim • J OtSQN i ft J ftONERS DOUfttAS J OLSON EAOl NEST LAFAYETTE 110 EXDELSlOft NN S51S1 Sa 21-117-fS tft OOAf 02415 NEST LAFAYETTE 110 VlCTOftlA L GAGNE VICTOAIA L GAGNE 2415 LAFAYETTE ED M EXCELSIOII m 55551 .V » MOft AOfti CfttCR NAM TAXPAYEII NANE/AOOII *. TOTAL ftATCH 605 i" ’ ».» % ^ 'v * ** V • V : V' •• . ♦ <.. •' I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORKATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE MEFWEPIN COUNTY 0«PARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE ANO BELIEF. DATE t^aslmc:BY^i Uddjui . I r- t ■f (print name(s)J (9Wa) rf?#^rH£uJs of (print address) Vx ^ |0 G '<> T o o (C. £ t i ^4. (ho liave reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use ot the property loctrted at 2,co, *0. u.fA'ie rTts: also referred to as Land Use Applicaiion^)^^ ^v<Uc P I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Date A -<.^0 -C(J^ If you have any information that may assist the City in tlie review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. SETBACK ZaNE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING R4RDCOVER IN ZONE A. House_____________ hardcover c .\lclxation worksheet 250-500 ’5Q0-ltJ»r X X B. Garage C- Dnveway D. Sidewalk f, E. Paiio/Deck f, f A\1U F. Lai^scapc Uodertain Bv-P!astic a X X X X X X X X J •G. Other - ^ ^ i TOTAL HARDCOVER [N ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A *^3 ^ISO _ B pnnposEP H/iwnrovER IN ZONE A. House _____________ Length B. Garage C. Driveway % X X X D. Sidewalk W .’AW P..) E. Patio/Deck • * F. Ltadsc^ _______________ Bv Plastic X X X X X X X X X G. Other - Xu 1 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^ B 7-"/“? 13 ^ • *S.F. Wiilltl a.S.F. •S.F. *S.F.*1 ♦ S F.• S.F. .... » =S.F.• • 3 («•*/ S.F. - ^»% 3 S.F.X *»% _ • __aiiii •-------' s.f./>/6.^, =S.F. ' S.F. V ... *.. < ■\0 't. =r S.F.P* '»sA. ■»S.F. # • *• -S.F.--K ' .• .♦ * ♦ •.• ' S.F.A S.F.B s 100 =% ■; ^ 'i : - •?. ? •/' a •S.F. Width S.F. 5=S.F. s S.F. S.F. S.F. 8 S.F. ♦ ♦■f S.F.- 8 ___S.F. a *7 <K> ) i-« u S.F.- I70..U 8 S.F. S / ' ^ ,' S.F. 8 S.F. 8 S.F. 8 /S.F. S.F.A /S.F.B AAldr X 100 =% ■ . ----------------^/ V ■y- #1966 00^^ CAttte'ti SCO Af iSt. 000 N A' ; A /: yC^.Vyb 7-/^?'?V k Io S <Sf Q I o vv Q» •" «l « ‘<1% • % ’J' >» VV t> vj •J Uj V) %A ?'l c 8 Is c \\ ^ i !? •« -5^ ? ? 5 5 • I• • %. i V z \It «• II s I m ,- I | i5 : M >* ^ >1•«« o V i V» I 5 K S « s s>♦*na •» • «• '•Vr.! I V I 1 h K 4>n. fn ^ •* •- ^ I «# i. t I.%. i • ••• •» ■M • I V ii 1 f •WI ««« « •- 3 ii I cl i : 2 i- « JJJ % ^ Z ^• I »s 'i \ i? ~8 r %» • %*nB •«•»•♦ •< I • %•<" • • • •• ■ W t « • > «« « • % «* «» Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. ^ ' ‘i\ I M;^r. I ^ s/i.',» ■ - ^ifi I l.nin, ' i.muri. k \\nuit • I-mh', l.»ki \1\ 1 hereby certify that this was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Sur\'eyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 7 -/2 - SCALE /";J0' m- ki> p: Bonestrod , nm ^ • -- --------- r*xvr%y*r% Rosene Anderl!k& Ivll Associates Engineers & Architects Oftc ^ ^ » to e^e "f * /i>seo^ C •Ai». « I. . ^ ■ :*“^3 S c.t« *s *»»c p»»i f ‘•o%ei *f %tHPr i k^»wn«c*» 'f V fVf* ^ z** • :e^ ?• V 'flDe- ^ '*»»**f** e v.i r . .-wnei • M»» .*r 1 Z V*'.' - %w •€ 8e^ T •€ August 2, 1995 r-» I - ‘0- * ! “oOf*** ' "a.\e* ^ * f. < S J .'* H V#** ^ Hjn5rr» *f VN*^iir* ' ’t *»'3 * * e j 'E 9 /»noe>\rr" ♦ ! '- iy^^* *C A S.^*o •* - -ie» s , '.‘e-^-nj 'f r^f/ •*» V„»- «e< '* 'f.-j “I *• ♦ A • ♦' I 7 * Vo e^ »AMi - G^VX>T! A>,%' ^ » '"f* M J-r^e ijge'-o^ 'l t ’ v- ^ Ate* ^ A#srW V'T*' pf ’►-.c i w,HAe-i •€ c* ,on N4^a D a *f ifo V '^P-Ae •» M e* § e'^^e*' '*• «r V „ ' . -^. O j >.e 't Agne*. »-ng « ^ A e*^e* ®t * fe*>je!*''Af<SP % City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-066 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: Navarre Lift Station No. 7. Our File 13973 V Dear John: I just want to give you a brief summary on the status of the Navarre Lift Station No.7. The submersible pumps for the station have arrived and the control panel is to be delivered next week. Ford Construction hopes to start work on the station in mid to late August. Attached is Change Order No. 1 for the Navarre Lilt Station No. 7. lliere has been no add/deduct in the cost of the project however there has been a change in the date of completion therefore a change order is required. Please review and sign all four (4) copies of the Change Order. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES 9fa^ Karen A. Cavett cc: File 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 1 -.7 Owner City of Orono, P O Box 66, Crystal Bay. Orono, MN 55323-0066 Date Jang 23. 1995 ContractCTt Fbcd Construction Co-. Inc., P.O. Box 667, Excelsior, MN 55331Bond Co. Washin«ton International Insurance Co 1930 Thoreau Dr^ Ste 101. Schaumburg, IL 60173 13973/co wbl CHANGE ORDER NO. I NAVARRE LIFT STATION NO. 7File 13973 By>Pnss Pumping • No Cost Install one duplex by-pass pumping station instead of two duplex pumping stations. Completion Date of Project - No Cost Extend date of completion to October 31, 1995. All site wcffk must be completed by September 15. 1995. Control Panel - No Cost Remove existing control panel in valve vault. Feed existing lights, receptacles, sump pump and fan from breakers in the new panel above ground (not in valve vault). TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (NO COST) Contract Unit antitv Price Total Amount 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 If Ori|p«i l Coctfact ^BOBrt Prevkiu* Change Oden Hiis Chanfe OnW Revised Contract Amo jnt (includini this chanfe order) Revised Completion $56.78100' $0 00 $56.782.0() Oct. 31. 1995 Reconunmded for Approval BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK A ASSOCUTES, INC. Approved by Contractor FORD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Approved by Owner cm’ OFORONO Distri button I - City i • Bonding Co. 1 • Contractor I-BRA 13973/co*bl REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \- % ■” - DATE: August ITEM NO: ! Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Tom Kuehn Aj^7 Title Finance Director // ' Agenda Section: Citv Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Appoint Insurance Agent of Record for 19% Attachments: • R.L. Youngdahl Insurance Agent Proposal • Agreement for Insurance Brokerage Seip/ices The City's insurance agent. Mr. Dewey Car n of the .Apple Valley Insurance Agency, retired during the summer this year after m^ v years ot service to the Ciw. Dewey was the primary municipal specialist in his tirm and the discussions I had with the remaining agents indicated to me that there was little desire to continue as Orono ’s insurance agent, in part due to the physical distance between their ottice and ours and thev do not actively seek municipal business but are con ' traling ; ere ettorts in other •> ^ ' areas. As a result we began discussions with Mr. Carl Bennetsen ot R.L. Youngdahl and Associates, who had indicated lost year that his firm would be very interested to serv e Orono as insurance agent of record. Mr Bennetsen has represented municipalities since 1977 and the agency currently hi^s 18 municipal or school district clients, many of which are in the surrounding area. I he firm .s located in the City ot Minnetonka so is conveniently close. Mr. Bennetsen haj prepared a detailed proposal that meets all the City's needs in this area and has indicated a fee for service fixed at $7,200 for each of the next three years. The fee proposed is also $680 less than the amount we are currently paying. As we will ha\e a new insurance agent for 1996 it is important that an early appointment be made so sufficient time and effort can be given to reviewing our various policies and insurance needs. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council appointment of Mr. Carl Bennetsen of R.L. Youngd:ihl and Associates, Inc. as insurance agent of rec >rd for 1996 at a fixed fee of $7,200. with a two year renewal at the same fee, and from year to year thereafter unless canceled in writing by either party. PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,____, seconded by,____, to apfXMnt Mr. Carl Bennctsen of R.L. Youngdahl and Associated, Inc., as Insurance Agent of Record for 19% through 1998, at a fee not to exceed $7,200 per >-ear, including any commissions earned on policy premiums paid by the City. Ayes____, Nays___. R.L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES, INC. August 1,1995 Mr. Thomas Kuehn, Finance Director City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Kuehn: Thank you for the opportunity to present an “Insurance Agent Proposal" to the City of Orono. You will find that our entire approach to working with our clients is based on our “promise of superior service." Our municipal clients recognize that we keep this promise through a pro-active service approach, includes specific recommendations after a comprehensive review of current insurance policies Based on our initial discussions, your City will benefit from our Agency’s specialized services, including; PACKAGE POLICY 1. Computerized building replacement cost valuations for insurance. 2. Claims monitoring (as opposed to review), and intervention with LMCIT if a problem arises. 3. Pre-renewal LMCIT Application computerized update. 4. Analyze existing insurable exposures relative to your present coverages. 5. Constant review of changing exposures in your community, and assist City in developing appropriate risk management strategies. 6. Evaluate the feasibility of using a large deductible, or self-insured retention, to generate large premium savings. 10261 Yellow Circle Drive • Minnetonka, MN 55343 9307 • 612 933 7488 • 800 888 5324 • Fax: 612-933-0916 PrintM on locvciid popM city of Orooo August 1,1995 Page 2 WORKERS* COMPENSATION 1. Managed Care Progrums-Evaluation of Competing Providers. 2. Experience Modification Rating Review. 3. Claims status review prior to the Experience Rating Claims Valuation Date. 4. Coordinate Loss Control Services with regard to safety and loss control Issues, including: OSHA/AV^AIR and other Federal and State mandated compliance programs. 5. Review Workers ’ Componsalion policy and audits for p'^opp!’ employee code cla^^'i'f'catiGna payrolls. Please see our attached Insurance Agent Proposal. I feel strongly that your Agency and your City will have an excellent relationship based on our conversations and the information you have provided. Sincerely. Carl A Bennetsen CAB/bs TABLE OF CONTENTS I.PROPOSAL II. ADDENDUMS: A. AGENCY PROnLE a PUBLIC ENTITY CLIENT LIST C. RESPONSE TO #II - EXAMPLE FORMS AND REPORTS 1. COVERAGE SUMMARY 2. PREMIUM COMPARISON (5 YEAR) 3. CHECKLIST OF INSURANCE NEEDS 4. BUILDING VALUATION D. MINNESOTA RISK SERVIC ES (MRS.) E. LET! ERS OF RECOMMENDATION CITY OF ORONO INSURANCE AGENT/BROKER PROPOSAL FORM AGENCY NAf IE: AGENCY ADDRESS; CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: DATE ESTABLISHED: R.L.YOUNGDAHL & ASSOC lATFi* 10261 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE MINNETONKA. MN 55343 CARL BENNETSEN (6121 933-7488 1975 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY'S HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: THE ORIGINIAL R. L. YQIJNGDAIIL & ASSOCIATES WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1975 TO WRITE AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE. A. SUBSIDIARY, MINNESOTA RISK SERVICES. WAS FORMED LN 1988. TO PROVIDE WORKERS* COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES. OUR CORPORATE BENEFITS DIVISION WAS FORMED IN 1988 FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS. INCLUDING HEALTH. DENTAL AND RETIREMENT PROGRAMS.___________________________________________________ R.L. YOUNGDAHL AND ASSOCIATES HAS WORKED WITH MUNICIPALITIES FOR OVER II YEARS. SEE ATTACHED AGENCY PROFILE. PRODUCT AND niWLi. AGENCY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 1.Is agent/broko* Ikensed in the State of Minnesota for all property/casualty insurance lines? Yes X ____ No _____ m 2.Describe your continuous experience with business or commercial insurance for the |H%vious five (or more) years. STARTED IN INSURANCE BUSINESS 1963 AS ACCIDENT______ PREVENTION REPRF.SENTATIVE. COMMERCIAL INSURANCE RFPRF.SENTATIVE SINCE 1968 WITH MANTFACTURIXC. WHOLESALE. CONTRACTOR CLIENTS. AND 15 YEARS_______ FYPFRIFNCE W ITH MUNICIPAL CLIENTS.__________________ 3. List ail other governmental risks written by agent in the last five years. GOVERNMENTAL UNIT PHONE #INSURER SEE ATTACHED PUBLIC ENTITY CLIENT LIST 4.Furnish the following information concerning your Agent's Professional Liabilitv Insurance. Name of Insurer: EMPLOYERS’ REINSURANCE CORP._________ Limit(s) of Liahilitv: i4.000.000 PER CLA1M/S4.000.000 AGGREGATE Deductible: $10.000 PER CLALM/$30.000 AGGREGATE__________ Provide a certiHcate of insurance with Agent's proposal. If your firm does not carry such insurance or limits, please check here._ 5.List all companies represented through direct agency contracts (indiode if the company actively writes and serv ices governmental risks): COMPANY WRITE GOVFRNMKNTAL RISKS: CNA INSURANCE ST. PAUL INSURANCE CO HARTFORD INSURANCE CO IJSFG _____________________ X (PENCOt CHUBB_______ NORTHBROOK 17 ADDITIONAU MARKETS - DIRECT AGENCY CONTRACTS List your agency's premium volume rates*, by category, as follov^s; ^iLLii Governmental Lii Commercial Lines *Rate categories R.\TE DOLLAR LIMITS 1 2 3 4 Under $500,000 $501,000 to $1,000,000 $1,000,001 to $2,500,000 Over $2,500,000 If your office is a branch or subsidiary office of a national or multi-office firm, break out the information for ) our office separately. 7.STAFFING: For each agent/broker, administrative or technical person, loss control engineer or inspector who would be assigned to this account, provide the following (note: seven blanks have been provided, if additional space is needed, use blank paper ar.d attach to the proposal): Name MU CARL BKNNETSFN Title:COMMERCIAL SAI FS RKP. Eyperience: 32 YEARS INSL RANCE INDLSTRY. 11 ^ EARS PRF^SENT AGENCY. REPRESENTED MUNICIPALITIES SINCE 1977. ______________ Professional llesignafions and Education: CPCU CANDIDATE. SEVERAL CIC COURSES Name Ml: PAT MEGER Title:COMMERCIAL SERVICE REP. Experience: 25 YEARS INSURANCE INDIJSTR\. 15 YEARS WITH PRESENT AGENCY, PRESENTLY SERVICING ALL MUNICIPALITIES IN THE OFFICE.______________________ COURSES. CIC COURSES. Name #3; JIM ADELMAN Title; SALES Ma NACER Experience; Ig YEARS INSURANCE. ^NDUSTRy Professional Designatii»n< a Name #4; SHELLEY HFRMANSOV Title; TI AIMS RFP. Experience; 4 1/2 YEARS IN THE INS!FRANCE I\mi<;TRY A,g CLAIMS REP. AND Cl STOVtKR «SFRVirK RFP Professional COURSES ion; LICENSED AOENT - rj(; Name MARK NFI SON Title:MARKETING MANAC.FR Experience; 20 YEARS INSURANCE INDI IS TRY. S YEARS PRESENT AGENCY. ____________ ■Professional Desienatioiis and Education: CPCU - I.Io:NSEn AGENT.________________ Name #6: SARA GARDNER Title: PRKSIDF.NT M.R.S • iwt III YEARS EXPKRIKNCF IN WORKERS' COMPENSATION C LAIMS. STATE OF MINNESOTA. FIREMAN’S FUND. MLRPIIY MOTOR FREIGHTLINES. AmrSTCO. ^ YEARS M.R.S._________________________ Professional I>esignations and Education: Name #7: Title: Experience: 8. Describe any other agency or company resources or special ______qualifications:_______________________________________ A. WORKER’S COMPENSATION SELF INSURANCE PROGRAMS__________________________________ B. Bl ILDINC. INSCRANCE VALUES PROVIDED LSING THE BOECHK SOFTWARE SYSTEM._______________________ r^_LLALMS^£\ 1£\V AmLYrmVmn^ 1). REVIEW CONTRACTS TO DETERMIN INSURANCE ___RAMIFK ATIONS.________________________________ F. MINNESOTA RISK SERVICES - SEE (>t!ESTION #9 FOR DESCRIPTION._____________________________________ Describe loss pn;vention ler^ice (safety, fire rtf .i flvailahle frnm nr thrniiph yniir a; [rtion. MINNESOTA RISK SERVICES A SLIBSIDIARV OF R.l YQLNGDAIIL & ASSOCIATES ON A FEE BASIS. CAN DESIGN A PR<X;RAM to identify and ANAIA ZE an INSURED'S RISK AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION NEEDS.____________ EEFECTIVEI Y SELECT THE PROPER HANDLING OF THOSE NEEDS AND DFiilGN. IMPLEMENT AND MONITOR A PROGRAM TO SUIT YOUR SPECIFIC WORKERS’ COMPENSATION NEEDS. SEE ATTACHED ADDENDLIM FOR FLIRTHER DETAILS._____________________________ your firm \»ould market the Cit} *s property and liahility insurance program. MEET WITH THE CITY INSURANCE CONTACT AND CITY STAFF TO DETERMINE INSURANCE COVERAGE NEEDS. AM) APPRAISE THE CONTACT OF HIE Ct?RRENT MLNICIPAE INSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS. REG.VRDING___________ C OM PARABLE COV ERAGES. PREMIUMS. AND SERVICES DECIDE WHIC II MARKETS TO APPROAC H WITH FORMAL RE(?LEST FOR PROPOSALS. OBTAIN PROPOSALS. AND PRESENT A FORMAL WRITTEN PRESENTATION WITH RECOMMENDATIONS. Attach cttpka q[ form and riienls. l ahd this Infofmation. "Rgsponse to #11.** Set Attached_______________________ TRFAT THF. AnKNrV/ACKNT AS A PARTNER i\ DETERMLNLNG CITY E:iPOSLRES. EV ALUATION. AND IMPl FAIFNTiNr. SOLLTIONS TO RISK MANACiE.MENT NFFDS. BEFORE A PROBLEM ARISES. MAINTAIN OPEN rOMMtJMCATION BOTH WRITTEN AND ORAL.________ WII J JNGNFSS TO 1 IST»:N TO BOTH GOOD AND BAD NEWS. AND rONFIDENCE THAT WF WILL PilT THE CITV_________ INTERESTS FIRST. 13. Are you billing to serve on a fee for service rather than a cummisioii _____basis? Yes X No . If not, prov ide your commission______ percpniapcs by coverage line: Commercial Package: Aiilomobile: Other, Describe: t 14., FEES FOR SERVICES; $7,200 ANNX^AL ProTide f<N» for the followii^ actn ities: •ilVJli Conduct an exposure survey Analyze policies and identify gaps, ONerlaps, failures to dovetail, structural deficiencies in the policies Assist in drafting insurance sjKcifications 1ST YR, INCLUDED INCLUDED Obtain quotes, negotiate and make rccommctKlations for placement of all required insurance INCLUDED Assess the stability of the proposed insurer including its re-insurance INCLUDED Audit outstanding claim reserves in excess of $5.000 INCLUDED Provide certificates of insurance INCLUDED PriK'ess requests for endorsements to the pt)licies (i.e., new vehicles and buildings) INCLUDED Process and monitor all claims against the City Policies and act as inter mediary between City and Insurer INCLUDED Provide annual stewardship report discussing previous year’s experience future concern and exposures, and goals and objects for the future INCLUDED Review policies, billings, claims INCLUDED Assist in loss control program in addition to insurer’s services INCLUDED ZNDYE. INCLUDED INCLUDED INCllJDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED im INCLUDED LNCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCl UDED INCLUDED INCLUDED # ACTIVITY Update insurable values 1ST YR, INCLUDED Provide an insurance policy notebook which contains all policies and a sumnury of coverages Provide a complete accouraing of commissions earned (direct and contingent) on the account INCLUDED Review and explain all coverage changes including implications anl iKw requirements INCLUDED Prepare a cumulative five year Premium and loss record INCUJDFD Assisi in minimizing premiums (reviewing and auditing rating basts, formulas, etc.)INCU^DED Attend Risk Control/Safety Committee meetings as needed INCLUDED 2ND YR. INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED LNCLUDED INCLUDED 3RD-YR. INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCIUDED INCLUDED ♦Assume the insurance and premium summary is accurate. Assume insurance is either placed net of commissions and services, or on commission offset fees. Assume that a minimum three-year agent of record relationship is anticipated except for unsatisfactory service or changing uncompetitive fee. Date: /?7-ji- V- 4 CERT^KATE OF INSURANCE (Cta^ Fir^ Made) iMue Date: Certificate Holder July 31, 1995 City of Orono Orono, HN RECE/veo ius ) ,9,5 This is to certify that EmpJoyers Reinsurance Corporation of Overiand Park, Kansas has Issued insurance coverage Policy desalted is subject to ail terms, exclusions, limitations and corxiitions of such policy Limits shown may have been reduced by paid claims. TYPE OF INSURANCE: Professional Liability for Insurance Agents and Brokers POLICY NUMBER NAMED INSURED: LIMIT OF LIABILITY: PAL-84036-A R.L. Youngdahl & Associates 10261 Yellow Clrle Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 a) MUTUAL FUNDS INCLUDED FOR: DEDUCTIBLE:a) $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 10,000 $ 30,000 each claim aggregate each policy period each claim aggregate each policy penod EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1. 1995 TO:January 1, 1996 By the issuance of this Certificate Employers Reinsurance Corporation assumes no obligation to provide notice of change in or cancellation of the policy. EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION Authorized R.L. YOUNGDAHL « ASSOCIATES. INC. : Z\\ 1 . X •- • ■ * J *ORATEPROnLE • • . PRODUCT AM) SERVICE GUIDE ,'W.CONTENTS 1.CORPORATE PHILOSOPHY - 1995 2.CORPORATE OVERVIEW - PROPERTY & CASUALTY DIVISION CORPORATE BENEFITS DIVISION BONDING DIVISION RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION HEALTH AND WELLNESS DIVISION HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION 3. 4. 5. CLIENT SERVICES INSURANCE COMPANIES REPRESENTED CORPORATE PERSONNEL. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS THIS PROFILE CONTAINS PROPRIETARY. TRADE SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM SHARING ANY OF THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT WITH OUR COMPETITORS THANK YOU RL. YOUNGDAHL AND ASSOCIATES. INC. CORPORATE PHILOSOPHY a We believe Quality People are our Most Important Asset a We win offer our Clients the Highest Level of Professionalism through Quality Service, Reliability and Integrity. □ We will provide National and International services with Innovative Products and Services. □ We believe Growtii is Necessary for Everyone’s Vitality and Opportunity. □ We want to Earn a Reasonable Profit to Insure the Continuity of the Organization. I L. R, L. YOUNQDAML AMD ASSOCIATES, INC, 102S1 YMtouf Circle Driv Minnetonka, Mlnn09Oi9 55343 Phon (612) 933-7488 Ton Free: 80(F888‘5324 Fax: (512) 933-0916 a The original R. L. Youngdahl and Associates Insuianee Agency was established in 1975. □ A subsidiary. Minnesota Risk Services, was established in 1988 □ Our Corporate Benefits Division was formed in 1988 a A subsidiary, Healthcare Pius was established in 1991 □ A subsidiary. H.R. Solutions was established in 1994. □ Premium Volume Managed $40. □ Future Direction: Continued enhancement of services to provide you with total and complete property and casualty, employee benefit and executive personal insurance and risk management. A commitment to developing long-term relationships by providing special attention to our valued customers and new clients. This will be accomplished by designing specialized programs to meet your changing needs. CORfK)RATE OVERVIIWPROPERTY CASUALTY DMSiONR.L YoungdaN and Associates takes a systematic approadi in smjctunng kmovative properly and casu^ irmawKe coverages desispied to mmimize your costs and provide protection against firtandai hardship to your business from insurable tosses.A wvelMnMiaged insurance program demarKis the attention of professionals with the knowledge and experience to provide state-of-the-art protection. At R.L. Your>gdahl and Associates we have the experienced people to meet the challenge of change • in your business and in our msurwKe indusby. Our team of experts will seardi out appropriate coverage attematives to provide quality protection and excellence in service at competitive marketplace pricing and insurance programs tttat are thoroughly customized at the greatest cost efficiency. The alternatives you should consider wiU ttien be presented to you in an understarxlabie proposal format. CORPORATE BENEFITS DIVISION R.L Youngdahl anc Associates' Corporate Benefits Division is unique in that our approach to the health care delivery system is non-traditional. We believe that it is more important to design a benefit “plan” utilizing effective long term cost controls, managed care and employee involvement programs, rather than just purchasing an aggressively low premium. Our experience counts. Each member of our benefits division staff has an average of sixteen years in the business. We have designed plans 'or sole proprietorships to Fortune 500 companies. From the simplest comprehensive major medical plan to full flexible compensation programs we have tfie ability to design customized programs to meet your highest standards. We believe that our service plans make us unique in our industry. We will work together with you to design, implement, and manage your benefit plan. Group Products/Services Administrative Services HeaKh Life Long Term Disability Short Term Disability Dental Vision Stop Loss Long Term Care Rx Plans AD&D Pension 401(k) EAP Plans Flexible Benefits Cafeteria Plans Section 125/129 COBRA Benefit Statements 5500 Services Library Services Consutting Services Benefit Design Analysis Proposal Design Employee Communication Materials Plan Management Data Analysis Strategic Planning Employee Meetings Employee Surveys Union Negotiations '«/B5 i. ' k L.30MStONWt offtr a fufl rang# of sarvicas to taka care of our diants boridRng naads. We are mpwiancad and hava access to tfte bast sur^ markets available.a Contract Bonds (B^j, ParfOrmanca, Payment) a Fir>anctal Guarantee Borxto □ Ucansa and Permit Bonds Q CoiatBonds a Public Offidal Bonds RISK MANAGEMENT OMStON Simply stated, risk mwiagamant is die idantification, analysis, and evaluafioh cf risks and the selection of the most advantageous method of handling it The fundamental objective is the preservation of assets and earnings resulting from toss or dasbuction. Through our assodation with Minnesota Risk Services we can assist in all areas: □ Claims Management a Semiruirs □ Return To Work Programs □ Safety Incentive Programs □ Coordination Of Medical Facilities □ OSHA Compliance HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION Our objective is to provide special attention to our valued customers and new dients by assisting with human resource management prograr^s and services. By mecung your spedatized needs, we are enhancing our commitment to long term, quality relationships with our customers and their employees. Examples of programs and services indude; □ Telephone "Hot Line" to resolve H R. management questions/issues □ H. R. Audits □ Employee Handbooks □ Supervisory Administrative Manual □ Job Descriptions □ Compensation Programs □ Training & Seminars □ Benefit Administration Programs □ Employee/Lc, elations □ Current Issues and Legal Interpretation Updates CLIENT SERVICES 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Negotiation and Placement of AH Required Insurance. Information on relevant changes in Insurance Markets, Products and Service. Assistance in Developing Comprehensive Insurance Coverages. A Preliminary Risk Management Survey will be done at No Cost to you to Identify the Insurable Exposures involved in your operation. Provide an Insurance Policy Inventory and a Summary Of Coverage in Lay Terms. Updated Annually. A Cumulative Premium and Loss Record, Updated Annually. Loss Exposure List and Classifications, Updated Annually. Assistance on Claims and Losses with a Periodic Update Provided Monthly. Quarterly or Annually. Assistance in Minimizing Premiums by Reviewing Rating Basis, Formulas, Worker’s Compensation and Liability Audits, ISO Worksheets, Claims, Settlements, etc. Also, Deductibles, Transfer of Risk, etc. Assistance in Loss Prevention Engineering and Loss Control. We will Initially Provide these services by use of an Agency Loss Control Expert. Periodic Assistance will then be provided by the Insurance Company we select. Attend Safety Meetings with Staff and Employees when necessary. Written Confirmation and Follow Up Provided to the Insured for Changes Requested from the Insurers. BENEFITS CARRIERS REPRESENTED CORPORATE BENEFITS A«tna American Medical Security Blue Cross & Blue Shield CIGNA CNA Delta Dental EBP Health Rans Employers Health Insurance Epic Life Fortis Benefits Great West Life The Guardian Health Partners John Alden Life Jefferson Pilot Lincoln National Kemper Life Mass Mutual Medica Metropolitan Life Midwest Security Minnesota Mutual The New England Network Health Plan Northwestern National Life Phoenix Homo Life Primecare The Prudential Reliance Standard Royal Maccabees Standard Insurance Company The Travelers United Health & Life UNUM Life Wisconsin Physicians Service CORPORATE PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS YEARS IN BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION OR EDUCA’ * 1-----------------TECHNICAL STAFF _____-.......-........1 PatMeger 22 IIA Kathy Broeckel 22 CIC Diann Smith 14 IIA Suzanne Martz 02 • Sandy Cartson PERSONAL UNES DIVISION AND CLAIMS DIVISION •Mary Howerton 07 Sandy Carlson 06 Shelley Hermanson 05 Claims • 1 CORPORA TE BENEFITS DIVISION | • Rick Allen 12 NAHU, MAHU. LPRT Diane Hyde 18 NAHU, MAHU Nancy Reed 17 NAHU, MAHU •Gayle Dorn 14 MBA.CLU CORPORATE PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL YEARS IN BUSINESS AFFILIATION OR EDUCATION 1 BONDINO DMStON ----1 Ralph Zehren 35 1 MRS RISK MANAGEMENT | Sara Gardner 15 Diane Howden 05 Kristen Wilsey 03 1 HEALTHCARE PLUS 1 Tom Suppes 04 1 HR. SOLUTIONS 1 Mitch Gast 04 isn itiano - s4mA L '• .1 >f -- X < .: '■ *-y 9 PUBLIC ENTITY CLIENTS OWOTBAYPORT C ity B rooklyn Park C ity OF B urnsvkle C ityofEaoan C ity OF H opkins H ennepm C ounty C ity of Independence C ity of Lonq Lake C ity of Maple Plain C ity of mound Mounds View School D istrict C ity of New B righton C ity of R obbinsdale C ity of R ockford C ity of St. Francis C ity of Savaoe West H ennepin Public Safety K en H artuno 439-2530 Fred A dams 424-8000 LES A nderson 895-4492 Gene Van Overbeke 681-4616 John Schedler 535-8474 R ichard Schultz 348-4674 Mary Leintz 479-0527 JOE LYNCH 473-6961 D on Loebrick 479-0515 Gino B usinaro 472-1155 C arl C olmark 636-3650 Margaret Egan 633-1533 R ichard Gangelhoff 537-4534 R uth D avid 477-6565 Steve B jork 753-2630 R onald H edbero 890-1045 R onald H edbero 890-1045 Larry B ailey 479-0500 (II#) S31JKVX3 - 3 I COMMERCIAL INSURANCE PROPOSAL FOR "CITY" R. L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES m LOCATION SCHEDULE LOCATIONS: 1. 2321 Marion* City, MN (Pump House #1) 2. Commerce Boulmrard, City, MN (Pump House #2) 3. 23S5 Chateau, City, MN (Pump House #3) 4. R235S Chateau, City, MN (Water Tank) 5. 5549-3 Points Boulevard, Qty, MN (Pump House #4 & #7) 6. 4461 WDshire, City, MN (Pump House #5) 7. 2415 WDshire, Oty, MN (Pump House #6) 8. 4845 Cumberland & 5503 Shordine, City, MN (Sirens & Towers) 9. 5341 Maywood Road, City, MN (VUlage HaU) 10. 2415 WDshire. Oty, MN (Fire Station) 11. 4834 Mandiester, City, MN (ViUage Garage) 12. 4843 Manchester. City, MN (Water & Street Office) 13. Various (Playground BuDdings 8c Equipment) 14. Various (Wat«* Tanks 8c Controls) 15. 5801 Bartlett Boulevard, City, MN (Community BuDdIng) 16. 2324 WDsHre, City, MN (Uquor Store) 17. 2800 Brighton Boulevard, City, MN (Booster Station) 18. 3036 Devon, City, MN (Water Tower) 19. 5468 Winwood Boulevard, City, MN (Public Works BuDding) PROPERTY COVERAGE BUILDING AND PERSONAL PROPERTY Blanket Limit Rlanlfgt Include! Limit of $180,000 at 2324 Wilshire Boulevard $ 2,500 Deductible 90% Coinsurance Replacement Cost Bettermen t! & Impcovements Agreed Amount Endorsement $ 4,516.690 Covoage Extoi^ons: 1) Newly Acquired or Constructed Property - Building - Personal Property 2) Personal Effects and Property of Others • Eadi Building 3) Val: » ps-pcrs and Records - Cost of Research - Each Building 4) Property Off-Premises 5) Outdoor Property - Limit - Maximum Item 6) Asbestos, Clean Up, Abatement and Removal - Per BuUding/AU Buildings - Subject to Policy Forms $ 250, 7) Pollution Cleanup and Removal - Per Policy Forms $ 10,( $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 2,500 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,000 $ 250 BUSINESS INTERRUPTION Loss of Earnings At Location 2324 Wilshire Boulevard 25% Monthly Limitation No Deductible $ 80.000 COVERAGE IS ALL RISK. SUBJECT TO COMPANY FORMS PROPERTY SCHEDULE LOCATIONS 1. 2321 Marion, MN Pump House #1 2. ComnMroe Boulevard, City, MN Pump House #2 3. 2355 Chateau, aiy, MN Pump House #3 4. R2355 Chateau, aty, MN Water Tank 5. 5549>3 Points Boulevard, City, MN Pump House #4 & #7 d. 4461 WDshire, aty, MN Pump House #5 7. 2415 Wilshire, aty, MN Pump House #6 8. 4845 Cumberiand & 5503 Shordine, Oty, MN Sirens & Towers 9. 5341 Maywood Road, aty, MN Village HaU 10. 2415 Wilshire. aty, MN Fire Station 11. 4834 Manchester, City, MN Village Garage 12. 4843 Manchester, aty, MN Water & Street Office 13. Various (Playground Buildings & Equipment PERSONAL BUILDING PROPERTY $ 29,500 $ 11,700 $ 38,000 $ 168,800 $ 142,700 $ 59,100 $ 126,700 $ 16,300 $ 1,407,104 $ 499,900 $ 103,500 $ 198,600 $ 15,500 Includ«l Included Induded Included Included Included Included $ 114.700 $ 28,600 $ 25,200 $ 17,800 $ 191,100 PROPERTY SCHEDULE CONTINUED 14. Varloia (Wato* Tuiks ft Controls) 15. 5801 brtlctt Boulevard, City, MN Community BuDdIng Id. 2324 Wilshire, Oty, MN (Uquor Store) 17. 2800 Brighton Boulevard, City, MN Booster Stai 18. 3034 Devon, aty, MN Water Tower . 10. 5448 WInwood Boulevard, aty, MN PubUc Works BuUding $ 295,814 $ 117,1 $ 180,< $ 119,41 $ 133,100 $ 780,000 Induded Induded Induded $ 40,000 CRIME COVERAGE Amount of Ir SlMt PUBUC EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY 1) atyCtericBood 2) Finance Director/Treasurer Bend 3) Other Employees - Per Employee Includes Faithful Performace Duty $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 THEFT, DISAPPEARANCE AND DESTRUCTION 1) Inside 2) Outside 3) After Businen Hours $ 3,< $ lO.t $ 2,( FORGERY OR ALTERATION $ 20,1 Employee Dishonesty Pays for loss sustained by an insured employer, up too a specified amount, caused by a dishonest act of an employee or employees covered under e policy. Theft, Disappearance and Destruction Covers loss of cash and checks by theft of an individual other than an employee, as well as disappearance and destruction of monies. Forgery or Alteration Covers checks, drafts, promissory notes, or similar written promises. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE ns OF INSUSANCE:Bodily Ibjury & Property Damage $1,000 DedtKtible Applies to All Property Damage Claims Premises & Operations ProdiK^s & Completed Operations Error or Omissions Liability (Municipal) $ 600,000 Included Included $ 600, I^mises Medical Payments - Per Person $ 1,0 - Aggregate $ 10,( Broad Form Liability Endorsement 1) Personal Injury $ 600,i a. False Arrest or Detention b. Libel, Slander or Defamation of Character c. Wrongful Entry or Eviction 2) Employees as Additional Insureds (Including Elected Officials & Volunteers While Acting Within Scope of Their Business) 3) Broad Form Property Damage 4) Extended Bodily Damage 5) Blanket Contractual 6) Fire Damage Legal Liaiblity $ 50,C 7) Non-Owned Watercraft (26’ Limit) 8) Incidental Malpractice - Including Paramedical Services General Liability Endorsed Exclusions 1) Any Operations Associated with the Ownership of an Airport 2) Any Ownership/Operations of a Municipal Hospital or Nursing Home 3) Any Injury to a Volunteer Fireman 4) The Policy Does Not Apply to Any Qaims Resulting From the City Failing to Supply Water, Electricity, Gas or Steam GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGES CONTINUED ns OF INSURANCE • CONTINUED: General Liability Endorsed Exclusions • Continued 5) The Pt^icy Does Not Apply to the Use of Watercraft if: a. The Boat is Over 26 Feet b. The Boat is Used to Carry People or Property for a Charge c. The Boat is Rented to Others 6> The Policy Does Not Cover the Failure to Give or the Giving or Any Professional Services, e.g.: a. Attorney b. Architect c. Doctor of Medicine. Dentist, Nurse, and/or Pharmacist 7) The Policy Excludes any Coverage for ’’Special Events" that Involve the Operation of: a. MechanicsJ’v Operated Amusement Devices b. Automobile, wnowmobile, or Motorcycle Racing or Stunting c. Rodeos *d. Fireworks Displays or Exhibitions 8) Pollution Exclusion With "Limited Pollution Liability" Coverage Per Policy ■^Exception: Lead and Asbestos Exposures - $200,000 per Claim and $200,000 Aggregate per Year. Coverage Does Not Apply to Landfills, Dumps, or Other Waste Facilities 9) Liability Arising Out of the Activities of Joint Powers Entity 10) Land Use Liability Coverage - 85% of Judgement and Defense Exposure of $600,000 Policy Limit ♦Coverage for specified event can be endorsed for an additional premium. # AUTOMOBILE COVERAGE AUTOMOBILE COVERAGES ARE AS FOLLOWS: M • I CombiiMd Sb^« Limit for Bodily Injuiy and Property Dam^e IndiMBaf Hired and Non«Owned Automobiles Combined Single Limit Each Person for Uninsured and Underinsured Coverage on all Vdiides STATUTORY NO FAULT (PIP) COVERAGE: No Deductible PHYSICAL DAMAGE - SI^CinCALLY DESCRIBED AUTOS Comprehouive Coverage Collision Coverage Provided cm specified vehicles with $250 Deductible per sdiedule Provided cm specified vdiida with $500 Deductible per schedule FRUGAL DAMAGE AUTOMATIC ON ACQUIRED VEHICLES REPLACEMENT COST FOR AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS; 1) 1969 Made Pumper Trude 2) 1976 Ford Tanker 3) 1981 Sutphen Model T5-100 4) 1985 Fond Pumper Truck 5) 1987 Chevrolet Chassis Fire Rescue 6) 1990 Emergency Rescue Vehicle $ 225,000 $ 75,000 $ 550,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 325.000 COVERAGE AVAILABLE FOR PHYSICAL DAMAGE FOR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT CONTAINED IN AND TEMPORARILY AWAY FROM THE FOLLOWING VEHICLES: 1) PoUcc Vehicles 2) Fire Trucks 3) Utility Vehicles 4) Ambulances 5) Other (Spedfy) SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES DaiL Stroil Pailc Water Sewer PoUce Vchide Number Year. Make. Model. & Serial t Deductibles •lul 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1974 Vac-All #1843 1981 Ford 2-1/2 T Truck w/Plow Wing #5619 1979 Ditch Witch Trailer 1983 Ford L800 #7082 1985 Ford Dump Truck w/Plow & Wing #5958 1987 Chevrolet Pickup #9201 1986 Ford Dump #5440 1973 Tank Truck #1887 1989 Pontiac Bonneville #2238 1981 Ford F350 1 T. Truck w/35' Boom & Utility Box #2687 1992 Ford 8000 Dump #3438 1978 Dump Truck #3751 1982 Chevrolet 3/4 T. 4x4 w/Plow & Box 1990 Chevrolet 3/4 T. Pickup #4799 1990 Chevrolet 1 T. Dump #1658 1973 Chevrolet Dump Truck #0589 1987 Pontiac 6000 #7165 1991 Chevrolet Pickup #3738 1985 Chevrolet Diesel Pickup #1286 1987 Chevrolet Pickup #1471 1987 Chevrolet Pickup #9118 1979 Ford F750 1/2 T w/Rodding Machine #0841 1970 Ford Truck w/Flusher Unit #3317 1989 Chevrolet S-10 Pickup #2967 1988 Chevrolet Beretta #7699 1989 Pontiac Boimeville #2998 1990 Pontiac Bonneville #3430 1990 Pontiac BonnevUle #3360 1991 Pontiac Bonneville #7318 1991 Chevrolet Lumina #0877 1991 Chevrolet Corsica #2528 Collisifl $250 N/A $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 N/A $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 N/A N/A $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 $250 $500 i Admin. Bn A1^. Brt I SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES - CONTINUED 32 1990 Dodge Dynasty #3037 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 $250 $500 33 1990 Dodge Dynasty #3036 $5( 1950 Dodge 3/4 T. Van #1456 1969 Mack #11 Pumper Fire Trade #1139 1973 Made #12 Pumper Fire Track #1508 1976 Ford Tankers #1709 1981 Sutphen Model T5-100 Fire Trade #1524 1985 Fold Pumper Trade #1441 1987 Chevrdet Chasis Fire Rescue #9503 1990 Emeigency Rrecue Vehide #3 1988 Chevrdet Celebrity #6161 N/A $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 N/A $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 INLAND MARINE COVERAGE rOVERAGE CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT .SOB SCHEDULE LIMITS $ RADIO EQUIPMENT • SEE SCHEDULE FECIAL FORM OF COVERAGE $1,000 Deductible Per Oocurraioe 100% Coinsurmoe Additional Acquired Property (90 Days - $50; Rental Reimbursment - Per Company Forms 1) $250 Per Day 2) $ 500 Aggre^te Limit limit) Street [flit SCHEDULE OF EQUIPMENT Item Des 1970 Cat Gardener 120, S#SN14K1983 Air Compressor & (2) Hammers 1989 Elgin Street Sweeper Trackless MT Diesel Snow Blower Roller - Raygo 2-36 1974 Asplundh Chipper 1984 Cat Loader, S#2289 Oder 1981 Ford Cherry Picker. S#8714 1989 Elgis Street Sweeper Street Department Umit $140,000 $ 26,000 $ 70,000 $ 50,000 $ 23,000 $ 13,500 $ 70,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 63,000 $ 480.500 Sewer 1976 Jet Machine Sewer Department Total $ 23,000 $ 23,000 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE CONTINUED Fire 8000 Feet of 2 1/2* Hose Q $1.80 6000 Feet of 1 1/2* Hose O $1.40 3200 Feet of 4* Hose HearstTool Fire De(»rtment Total $ 16.0( $ 9.0C $ 19.2 $ 10.0( $ 54.2 Police (5) Kustom Signals HR 12 Moving Radars O $ 1.700 Each (4) Overhead Oaisoles 9 $ 900 Eadi Police Department Total $ 8.500 $ 3.600 $ 12.100 Polioe/Radios (8) G.E. VHF PoUcc MobUes 0 $ 1.500 Each (Bolted in Squads) (5) G.E. UHF PoUce 0 $ 1.500 Each (6) Portables 0 $ 1.500 (5) Johnson Mobile Units 0 $ 714 Each (Bolted in Squads) (5) Light Bars & Sirens 0 $ 1.500 Each Total Police Department Radio Equipment $ 12,000 $ 7.500 $ 9.000 $ 3.370 $ 7,500 $ 39.370 Parks 1974 Ford 2000 w/Loader 1987 Melroe 843 Diesel Bobcat 72" Gravel Bucket Pallet Forks Gappler Land Scrapper Tree Spade Cab Enclosxire 1984 Howard Turf Blazer 72" Diesel 727 1987 10,000 LB Dual Axel Trailer w/Tool Bin 8l Ramps Parks Department Total $ 20.1 $ 16j $ 5 $ 4 $ 7 $ 700 $ 700 $ 200 $ n $ 13,000 $ 1,800 $ 54,000 LIQUOR LEGAL LIABILITY (DRAMSHOP) LOCATION: 2324 WOihlrt Boulevard, "aty**. MN 5S364 ns OP LIABILITY Bodily Injury * Eadi Pttscm Bodily Injury - Eadi Oocurrenoe Property Damage - Eadi Occurrence Loss ci Means of Support - Each Person Loss of Means of Support > Eadi Oocunei Policy Aggregate Based on Receipts of: $1,104,498 S5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 FIREMAN’S ACCIDENT & HEALTH ACCIDENTAL DEATH A DISMEMBERMENT Maximum Amount of Benefit Loss of Life, Limbs or Sight Weekly Disability Benefit Maximum Time Payable: 52 Weeks $5,000 $ 25/Week # EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE (OPTIONAL) LIABILITY LIMIT $ 1,000,' cm OF_ _ _PIEMIUM SUMMAtT 1993-94 1992-93 1991-92 1990-91 lusmst mtnoFTioii €11 POILIC IMPLOTIE DISHONESTY cm ClJtt i TIEASUIER BONDS TIBPT. DX8APPBABANCE & DESTRUCTION P0R6ERT OR ALTERATION GENERAL LIABILTH ERRORS AND OMISSIONS AUTONOBILE LIABILITY UN/MIM PHYSICAL DAMAGE INLAND MARINE LIQUOR LIABILITY FIREMAN'S AD4D WOREERS COMPENSATION I I I I $ I 8,247 $10,095 1 10,794 $8,371 258 INC INC • $244 1,100 $1,100 1 1,100 $1,100 200 $200 1 200 $200 365 $272 1 286 $293 138 $138 1 138 $138 45,975 $48,011 $ 48,625 $46,740 5,896 $5,628 1 5,624 $5,556 13,500 $13,551 $ 13,550 $13,026 555 INC INC INC 10,699 $10,005 1 11,153 $10,012 3,056 $3,081 1 3,220 $3,296 7,731 $6,575 $7,069 $5,125 300 $250 $250 $250 53,234 $57,845 $ 57,841 $59,924 TOTALS 1151,254 $156,751 $159,850 $151,575 A MUNiaPAL ENTITYCHECKL.ST OF COMMERCIAL INSURANCE NEEDS FOR:R.L. YOUNCDAHL €c ASSOCIATE: N O f C 0 V • II 1 • Ho T c co o V ¥ f t • II f f 0 0 Mo T C 0 V 1 • f 0 Ml MLOMOi SpacMForm • 3. BIwMLIml »gna Flo«t LMM PolMlon ClMnup PERSONAL PROPERTY SpicWFwm Actual Caali Valu* Agraad Amount BlankalUmt Colnauranoa Paraonai Proparty of OQtan PaNcSoMon LOSS OF INCOME Loos of Eaminga ConUngonl Bus. MsmipHon. Extsndsd Psrtod of Indemnty Off'Promisss Powsr Falurs Coirwurartos/Monlhly UmBsUon Ordinsry Payrol Indudod INLAND MARINE Elsctronic Data Procsasing Accounta Rsosivablo Valuable Pspsra Cargo In TranaR Installation Floater Employee Tools Rental Equipmonl Equip. LaoMd or Loaned to Oittoia □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ % B" NJUiiD MARME (CONT J ExhiMionFI FraAfts □□□□□□□□ □□ □□ □ □ □□□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ O□□□□□a□□ □□ □ □□ %□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ u □ □ □ □ %□□□□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ •e Cl lA^lOEUTY Faihlul Ptrfonnanot ThMft. DinppMranoM A CMrucfio ERISA Cornpltance KkJnaiVRanMom UABIUTY ComprthtntivM Municipal LtabIHty Ganaral A^KT^gatt ProcKicts A CompMad Oparaliona PMsonal A A<Nai1iaing Injury FIra Oamag# (Any Ont Fire) Medical Expense (Any One Pereon) Aggregate Per Location Aggregate Per Job Site NorvOemed Aircreft Non>Owned Watercraft Employee Benefit Liability Liquor Legal UebiUty Feikjw Employee Exclusion Deleted Umitod Poaubon Liability Lead or Asbestos Claim Limit Land Uea Regulabon Claim 7. SPECIAL LIABILITY COVERAGE Professional Liability Directors A Officers Liability /Entity Fiduciary Liability Foreign Liabiiity Liquor Legal Liability Owned Aircraft Owned Watercraft Emptoymenl-Ralaled Pre^ioee Ltebffity Commercial UmbreOa Products Recall A ConUvnlnation PolKjtion Liability □□□□□ □□□□□□ O□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□ □□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ SPECIAL LIABtUTY COVERAOe (CONT.) Petrofund Suppiamant Open Meetin g Law Ra«nbureamar>t □□□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□□ AUTOMOBILE Oemad Autoa NorvOwnad A Hired UebBty Drive Other Car CoMerage Personal tr^jury Protection Broadened PIP Underineured Motorist Umneured Motorist Rental Raimbureament Collision Comprehensive Rental Vehld^ Damage Fellow Employee Exduelon Daisied Towing GARAGE INSURANCE Garage Liability Garagekaapars Legal Garagekaepers Direct Option Dealers Physical Damage WORKERS COMPENSATION Statutory Coverage Employer's Liability Lor^gshoremwi City CouncH Included Voiunteera MadIcal/AD AD BOILER A MACHINERY Boilef A Machinery Business Interruption Mechanical Breakdown Machinery Outage □ □ □ □ □ □ a □ □ □ □□□□□□□□□□□□ □ □ □ U □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□□□□□ □ □ □ □ □ □o□ □ □□□□□□□□□□□□ □ □□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□□□□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ □ Date Date Agent _ Irrsured 9,t. YnfTN*r;n4HT ASSOCIATES p 1 YOfTNGDAHL A ASSOCIATES i2/20/<»2 pHO©r 9*W ; ©pnoc^”^ ADOPFSS •FT RE 4 COW CTTV OF 07/94 COST AS OF; 3/91 #002458 RTtl^.OTiAJ ORSCRTPTTOH — SECTTON nrrc«T>«.ncy; Consrrnrrron: Vu.r:b*“r of Stor-*^^: Oropp «'lnor Ar^n: ypar 3u.^}t: Wan. Opaninga: "'oral PerTaotar: A’^araga Srory Haight: D^mar.^c Region: Condition: 201 Office. Low Rise 2 .Tolsted Masonry 1 5,000 Square Feet 1964 10 % 260 Feet 10 Feet Cold 1 Excellent OF 7.0%are INCLUDED) Slta Preparation Foundation Wall Interior Foundation# Slab on Ground Framing Fxtar.lor WaJ3 1,00% Concrete block Srrurrura} Floor Roof Material - T009. Single membrane Rltch - 1.00% TjOW Floor Fin.ieh 50% Carpeting 50% Vlny] Cen*ng Fin.‘»ah ■c-a** *:ltlo*'^ — 245 F^et Mjjif) — 45% Block 55% Stude, girts - 55% Plvwood, hardboard, fiberboard 45% None P'*u!5b7.r.g — R Tot-al Fixtures Hearing 100% Forced warm a.ir Cooling 100% Forced cool air Flecrrica) 100% H.rgh electrical quality B’l.’ 1 r—Ins nt»'e'»* Building Services 10% Automatic Fire Detection System __ _ _ _ BASE COST 550 17,862 5,554 11,000 8,8X7 22,230 0 42,072 8,450 6,550 9,657 14,404 7,300 10,750 43,960 4,500 85 T,«*v -5'Top 4 rnvM 07/*»4 12/20/- *»4SE SM9TOTV !T.nr'’*T?T IE® »OTV j replacement cn.s'*’ 213,741 1.45 30R.Q24 TOTA^ SECTION 1 309,924 POT.TiTV NITMAER; Z -FIRE & COMM 07/94 12/20/9 # .SECTION SfJMMARY REPLACEMENT COST SO FT COST 201 Off.^ce, Low 309,924 61.98 TOTAI. TOTAL TNSUREO AMOTINT % OP TNSITRANCF. TO VAI UP 90A CO-TNSTJRANCE REQ. 309,924 400,000 129% 278,932 61.98 BOECKH .system , A oRODfTCT OF AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ABOVE COSTS TNCLTiOE TJ^ROR ANO MATERIAL, NORMAL PROFIT ANO OVERHEAD AS OF DATE OF REPORT. CO.STS REPRESENT GENERAL E.STIMATFS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A DETAILED QUAIfriTY SrjRVEY. OFFICE: as Ia VI0S3NX1K - a--------- -------0 . V-. y . MINNESOTA RISK SERVICES WORKERS COMPENSATION risk management specialist RISK MANAGEMENT Is A. eoonfinatcd effort ct numasemoit to ensure and protect your company from financial loss due to an injury or accident claim ASK YOURSELF Is your experience mod rating over .95? Are you presently in the "Assigned Risk Pool"? Has your company instituted wwk comp programs in the past with little success? Does your workers compensation premium represent a major portion of your business insurance expenses? Are you with a formalued/active safety program or return to work program? THE PROBLEM If your answer is yes to any of these questions, you may be paying more for workers compensation insurance than necessary. THE SOLUTION! At Minnesota Risk Services, our goal is to control present losses and minimize future loss exposure with aggressive and active risk/claims management. CUSTOM TAILORED TO YOU We will identify and analyze your company's risk and workers compensation needs, effectively select the proper handling of those needs and design implement and monitor a program to suit the specific workers compensation needs to your company. A program that offers claim prevention, maintenance and continued follow-up. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Through continued service, we will provide claims management, assist in safety programs/seminars, and coordinate between the insurance company, the employer, the employee, and the medical provider. Intum, controlling present losses, minimizing future loss exposure and reducing the overall costs of your workers compensation program. SERVICE FEE Annual fee is determined based on the claims activity and programs that are to be Implemented. A.W.A.I.R. PROGRAM ( CREATION, ■ Job Hazard Analysis • Accident Investigation ■ Safety PoucY ■ Enforcement • Education OF Employees TATTON & TRAINING) ^ WRITTEN EVACUATION POLICY AND EVACUATION MAP ^ WRITTEN RESPIRATORY PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) ESTABLISH SAFETY COMMITTEE (facilitate meeting / PROVIDE WRITTEN MINUTES) PROVIDE MONTHLY SAFETY TOPICS ESTABLISH PROGRAM TO MEET AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REQUIREMENTS o PROVIDE INFORMATION. IF NEEDED, ON PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS PROVIDE INFORMATION, IF NEEDED, ON FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAMS WORK WITH INSURANCE CARRIER LOSS CONTROL • Periodic Loss Control Visits • Audio -Metric Testing (noise level ) ■ Programs As Applicable O PROVIDE INFORMATION ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND SET UP PROGRAM O ESTABLISH RELATIONSHIP WITH DESIGNATED MEDICAL FACILITY AND CONTACT PHYSICIANS FOR TREATMENT PLANS ■ Fitness For D uty Exams ■ R-32 Forms O O DESIGNATE LIGHT DUTY JOBS IN THE WORK PLACE D.O.T. FEDERAL AND STATE MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS CLAIM UPDATES ON ALL OPEN CLAIMS EVERY 60 DAYS REVIEW ALL OLD CLAIMS FOR REDUCTION AND CLOSURE •TCC RUNS SENT TO CUENT QUARTERLY CREATE A FORMAL RETURN TO WORK POLICY ESTABLISH EMPLOYEE REPORTING PROCEDURES FOR WORK RELATED INJURIES ESTABLISH EMPLOYER REPORTING PROCEDURES LOCK-OUT / TAG-OUT TRAINING EMPLOYEE RIGHT-TO-KNOW PROGRAM AND TRAINING FORKLIFT TRAINING BLOOD BORNE PATHOGEN TRAINING OSHA 200 FORMS STATE, FEDERAL* OSHA POSTERS SAFETY INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FORMAL WRITTEN SAFETY POLICY I SOJLOl - a 'W CITY of MOUND 5041 MArwOOO ROAD MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 166: (612) 472 0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 O 2 H, n 7 I V*.' April 6, 1993 R.L. Youngdahl 6 Associates _ 10261 Yellow Circle Drive Minneapolis, MH 55343 To Whom this May Concern: The City of Mound has utilized the services of R.L. Youngdahl 6 Associates for over 10 years. R.L. Youngdahl 6 Associates has been the City's cossercial insurance agent for this ti«e and has offered excellent service to us. They are very responsive to our questions and concerns and do an excellent job of administering the City's insurance program. They currently are of our commercial insurance needs through the League of Minneso Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Throughout the year <rje®J;°"® regarding coverage, claims, etc., will arisu. The agency is there to respond. I recommend them to any municipality who is seeking an insurance agent for their commercial insurance program. erely, :dward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager ES: Is primed on recycled peper rt^ VCITY OF ROBBINSDALE 4221 LAKE ROAD fi^OBBINSOALE. MINNESOTA 55422 TELEPHONE; (612) 537-4534 To Hhom It May Concern: The City of Robbinsdale has engaged R. L. Youngdahl and Asso ciates for approximately the last twelve years as their insurance agent. The City has participated in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Fund since its inception. We have been very satisfied with the long standing relationship that has existed between our insurance agent, representing the city, and the League's program. I'm convinced that some of the claims that the City has received payment for would not have occurred if it wasn't for the insistence of our insurance agent that the City had coverage under the insurance policy and was entitled to payment. As part of their service, price comparisons are made and evaluated for coverage annually to assure that the City is receiving the best value possible. If you wish to speak to me do not hesitate to call roe at (612) 537-4534. Sincerely, City of Robbinsdale Richard Gangelhoff Finance Director RG:mh AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER VoFoagan THOMAS EGAN MavO( PATRICIA AWAOA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Momdors THOMAS HEDGES CiN Admirmfrotof August 31, 1993 E.J. VANOVERtEKE City Ci*rk R.L. YOUNGDAHL k ASSOCIATES 10261 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55343 To Whom It May Concern: The City of Eagan has worked with Jeff Bowers for over 4 years while he was at First Insurance and now with R.L. Youngdahl. Jeff and his agencies have consistently provided prompt and responsive service to the City. Presently they handle all of our commercial insurance needs through the IUCIT program. Throughout the year as questions and concerns arise, the agency is there to respond. Mr. Bowers is also very diligent in bringing new ideas and initiatives to the attention of the City. I recommend them unconditionally to any municipality who is seeking an insurance agent for their commercial insurance program. Sincerely, E.^. VanOverbeke Finance Director/City Clerk EJV/vmd MUNICIPAL CENTER 3U0 Plot UNO# IKDAO EAGAN. MINNESOTA $$1221897 PHONE (612)68l-4«00 fAX (612)681-4612 too (6l2)4S4-8$3$ THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal OppoituniiY/Atfiimaiive Action Emptoyei MAINTENANCE FACIUTY 3501 COACHMAN POfrt EAGAN. MWNESOIA $5122 PHONE; (612)681-4300 FAX; (612)681-4360 too (612)4$4-8$35 ctrv neu bpiomtoh TEU • j *5 E u S ^iep 01'93 13-Jl Nu.006 P.Ol i^of_M«on thedty thst wotksforyou I, IM3 tO> 0»1« »3»-*»** r>: »*tf«T«t ». »*«>. ' 636-S053 Us Toonfdahl *m1 A*«oci*t«* r«fer«aca 0. uh.u.. 3..f I»‘:;siri"u? ?“.r‘.V. Vt^rVtV.'rin.iJ^ci^as our 80Uor*l yeor* while successor to first the ««ly P*« »* ttJ!^ In Jnly »*'“ If'"- * v« .nc. »..ln .. ou, .,«t. for the «itlt. tt« thot I h»« been Vre*.~“-«‘®^S‘Se - So toc«nd Jeff without teretwitlon.I ao --- - fleeee flee mt » cell If you hew. eny uuettlonr. tn<JtO€nd«ni Schoo* 0«scnct No o2l Mounds View Public Schools 2959 North Hamimo Aw«nu« • St. Paul. Minnosot* • 55113 • Phono (6 121536*3650 Carl M. Colmarlu Oiractor ol Finance March 4, 1993 To Hhon It May Concarn: Hounds View Public School District #621 is one of the ten largest school districts in Minnesota. The District has an enrollment of 11,500 students, 1300 employees and a $68 million budget. Several years ago the District engaged the services of Youngdahl and Associates to act as our insurance agent, risJc management consultant and employee benefit consultant. p^ior to working with Youngdahl and Associates we worked ^ith a multitude of insurance agencies for each of our insurance policies and employee benefit packages. The District also contracted with an independent employee benefit consultant to assist in devel^oping employee benefit plans and bid specifications. Since Youngdahl and Associates have expertise in all areas of insurance and employee benefits we no longer need to coordinate efforts with numerous agents and consultants. There is another significant reason why Youngdahl and Associates to serve as our agent. insurance and employee benefit expertise they provide workers cSm^nsalion consultation services through their Minnesota Risk Services. The availability of . from Minnesota Risk Services in the area of a has provided a missing link in the Districts effort to maintain a low experience modification rate. Ton Gallaghsr, our agant with Your-1^1 and assisting tha District for saverii years. Mr. Gallagher s professional approach and personal attention has '=•«" ?n by District staff, his Icnowledge and -Kperience has significant savings on the insurance premiums ^or the District. Youngdahl and Associates are a large firm with ^Q^ee highly icnowledgeable in the areas of risk management and benefits. It is comforting to know that we can limit ° hiahly with agencies and consultants to one reliable firm. I wou g Y recommend Youngdahl and Associates to any organize ion. Sincerely, Carl M. Colmark S*rv,nq commun.n« o. Arden H.lls • Mounds View • New Bnqn.on • Nonh Oaks • Rosev.ll* • <horev,ew • Vadna.s jmiiu 'f ina £-?^ninv.mwni * m REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Aug. 11,^995 ITEM NO: /Q < >s Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Thle Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed: M__ Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Highway 12 Development Moratorium Ordinance The City Council, at its July 24 meeting, directed staff to revise the proposed Highway 12 moratorium ordinance to include areas on the south side of Highway 12 and on the west side of Old Cry stal Bay Road, in addition to the area north of Highway 12 between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bav Road. The attached ordinance reflects the inclusion of the additional areas. •» ^ COUNCIL ACTION REQLTsSTED: Motion to adopt the ordinance placing a moratorium on development in the Highway 12 area 1 ORDINANCE #, 2ND SERIES INTERIM ORDINANCE FTISUANT TO MIN^NESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, ZONING (CUP/VARIANCE) APPROVAL, REZONESG, PUD OR BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR AS DEFINED HEREIN. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No. , 2nd Series. SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The City Council finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of applicanons for subdivision, rezoning, zoning (CUP/Variance), PUD or building permits for propeny within the Highway 12 Corridor. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be approved may be undesirable because the current ordinances may not be consistent with the City’s zoning and development goals. The Council, therefore, finds that it is necessary to study the impact of development under current ordinances to determine whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City’s land use and zoning provisions. The Council further finds that if. as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has been completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property in order to bring about savings of public and private expenditures and to provide the public guides to funire City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning permitted land use and zoning pertormance standards, the granting of preliminary approval of subdivision applications, zoning (CUP/Variance) applications, rezoning applications, PUD or building permits for property within the Highway 12 Corridor would be contrary to the purpose of the zoning enabling act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.351, et seq. The Council furdier finds that it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study SECTION 2. Highway 12 Corridor Defined. As used in the Ordinance, the Highway 12 Corridor shall be defined as four areas of property within the City of Orono defined as follows; Area 1. That area bounded by U.S. Highway 12 on the south. County Road 6 on the north. Willow Drive on the east, and Old Crystal Bay Road on the west. Area 2. That area bounded by U.S. Highway 12 on the north. Old Crystal Bay Road on the west, the Burlington Northern Railroad on the south, and the municipal boundary between Orono and Long Lake on the east. Pane 1 of 2 V Ar« 3. That area bounded by U.S. Highway 12 on the north. Burlington Northern Railroad on the south and west, and Old Crystal Bay Road on the cast. Area 4. That area hounded by Old Crystal Bay Road on the east. County Road 6 on the north, and U.S. Highway 12 on the south and west. SECTION 3. Study The CouncU hereby refers this matter to the Planning Commission to initiate a study regarding tia implications of the potential need for amendments to the City code to implement the results of that study. SECTION 4. Restrictions on the Granting of Preliminary Subdivision Tnniny (CTTp/Variance) \Dproval. Rezoning. PUD or Building permits. No preliminary' subdivision approval. Zoning (CUP/Variance) approval. Rezoning, PUD or Building Permit approval shall be given by the Council for any propeny within the Highway 12 Corridor as defined herein. SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire on January 22, 1996. without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council detennines that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any locessary revisions of the zoning code, have beeti finalized. The duration ot this Ordinance cay be extended by adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total ot not more than 18 a Iditioiial months. SECTION 6. Variances. The Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance » <he Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the ntent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is compati ‘ with tU zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it doc » 'scly impact the health, safety or welfare of the citizens and that U otherwise meets the requirements of the Orono City Code and state law. SECTION 7. Senarabilitv. Every section. | vision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or, i; and if any section, provision, or pan thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held .nvalid, it shall not atlcct any other section, provision, or part. SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE: LAKER and shall be effective immediately Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 14th day of August. 1995, by a vote of____ayes and_____nays. AHEST; Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 2 of 2 'ft REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '<55 DATE: Aug. 11, 1995 % ITEM NO: / I %>» Department Approval: Naoi« Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Jt/A Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: School Liaison Program Agreement d ' The Orono Police Department has been providing a pan-time school liaison officer program to the Orono School District since the summer of 1994. This program is provided under an agreement with a one year term. The School District has been ver>’ pleased with the program over the past year and is interested in continuing the program. The program is fully funded by the School District. The attached agreement has been updated to reflect current costs and is acceptable to the School District. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve 'he continuation of the school liaison officer program for the 1995/1996 school year, and t- authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the agreement. I CONTRACT FOR SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER SERVICES mm Tv", S' ^ This contract sets out the terms and conditions of the agreement bemeen Orono Indq)cndcnt School District #278 and the City of Orono for the provision of a School Liaison Officer by the City of Orono to School District #278 during the 1995-96 school year. 1. Duration and Renewal • » , The agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the date of execution to June 1. 1996 and shall be automatically renewed annually thereafter for each successive contract ye^ unless terminated by either party by serving written notice of termination by March 1st of the current contract year. 2. Costs to School District #278 and Contract PavmgrUS . The total budget for the school liaison officer program for the school year 1995-96 is SI 1.885. Tte hourly rate for the School Liaison Otficer for this school year is S21.00 per hour. The Orono School District will pay to the City of Orono S5.942.50 on January I, 1996 and $5,942.50 on June 1. 1996. (These amounts are estimates based on the number of hours indicated in paragraph 3 - Schedule of Hours. The actual amount tor work performed will be billed with the June 1, 1996 billing, according to the written log of activities and hours.) The budget, hourly rate, and payment amounts will be updated at the time of each contract renewal based on estimated City costs. 3. Schedule of Hours The total number of School Liaison Officer hours to be provided at the cost ot 511,885 is 566 hours. The unused hours from the previous school year is 250 hours (See Attached), for a total of 816 hours to be scheduled for the 1995-96 school year. The general schedule of the School Liaison Officer will be approximately 24 hours per week during the school year 04 weeks). The schedule of working hours will be established by the Chief of Police, in consultation with the School Administrators, in order to respond to emergencies or periods of high need trom either the Police Department or the School District, the specific School Liaison Officer work hours may be adjusted by the Police Chief. The School Liaison Officer services provided by the City of Orono will not exceed $11,885 during the contract period without the mutual consent of the City of Orono and School District #278. 4. Srhool Liaison Officer, an employee of the City of Orono The school liaison officer will be a police officer of the City of Orono and will be subject to the policies and procedures of the City and the Police Departmc it. 5. <;rhool l iaison Officer Selection The School Liaison Officer will be selected by the Police Chief in consultation with the School District staff. Cootract for School Liaison Officer Servk» 2 of Z 6. The Sdxx)l T tai<nn Officer will work under the supervision of the Orono Chiet of Police. Monthly meetings will be scheduled between the School District Admimstrators. the School Liaison Officer, and the Chief of Police to develop specific monthly work schedules and work priorities. 7. School Liaison Officer Attire , . , u a r - The School Liaison Officer will normally wear suitable plain clothes attire. A police uniform will be worn as conditions dictate such as special events, presentations, coming from or going to other assignments which require a uniform, etc. 8. SrhnnI Liaison Roles und Responsibilities The Liaison Officer's main responsibilities will be: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. To build rappoft and be available and visible to students through informal contact in the buildings, at student activities, with student groups and during scheduled office hours. To assist school authorities, social workers, etc. when requested on issues of criminal activity, chemical use, abuse, etc. The liaison otficer will not be the authority for disciplining students on school premises. That function will remain the responsibility of school authorities who will enforce their own school rules and policies. To assist with the development and implementation of programs designed to counteract negative juvenile activity such as youth service programs, SADD, PRIDE, Peer Helpers, etc. To make classroom and public presentations on Juvenile and criminal activity related topics. To serve as a resource person and provide support to school staff, students, parents and community members on issues related to criminal activity, chemical use, abuse, snident conflicts, etc. 6. To foster communication between the police department and the schools. APPROVED; City of Orono NealJiXawson, District ^278 Date Date 1 Period Prior to July 3, 1994 July 3 - 17 July 18 - 31 August 1 — 14 August 15 — 28 Aug 29 - Sept 11 Sept 12-25 Sept 26 — Oct 9 Oci 10-23 Oct 24 — Nov 6 Nov 7-20 Nov 21 - Dec 4 Dec 5-18 Dec 19 - Jan 1 Jan 2 - 15 Jan 16 — 29 Jan 30-Feb 12 Feb 13-26 Feb 27 - Mar 12 Mar 13 — 26 Mar 27 - Apr 9 Apr 10-23 Apr 24 — May 7 Mav 8 — 21 May 22 — Jun 4 Jun 5 — 18 Qty of Orooo Setuxd tiason OCBccr Services For The 1993-1994 Sl 1994-1995 School Years Hours Worked Total 1993-1994 & 1994_ 1995 School Years Amount Paid to the City of Orono Bv School District #278 46.00 20.00 25.50 10.75 3.00 18.75 60.50 57.00 29.00 48.00 44.00 16.00 42.50 19.50 11.00 49.50 48.00 40.50 33.00 41.00 17.00 34.50 36.00 41.00 32.00 40.00 864.00 Credit Towards 1995 - 1996 School vrar ]Flate 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Jun 1, 1994 Jan 1, 1995 Jun 1, 1995 Hours Total Cost 920.00 400.00 510.00 215.00 60.00 375.00 1,210.00 1,140.00 580.00 960.00 880.00 320.00 850.00 390.00 220.00 990.00 960.00 810.00 660.00 820.00 340.00 690.00 720.00 820.00 640.00 800.00 17,280.00 11,139.00 5.570.00 5.568.00 22,277.00 250.00 Amoimt of Funds 5,000.00 ■m Pir REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %y. DATE: Aug. 11. 1^,,, % ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Scheduling of Budget Work Session Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report At the July 26th budget work session, the Council provided direction to staff regarding several revisions to the proposed 1996 budget. A budget overt'iew report retlecting these revisions has been provided to the Council. The overall result of the revisions is that the tax levy will increase by 3.12% and the tax rate will be reduced by 2.78%. The Council may wish to schedule a work session to review the budget revisions or discuss other budget issues prior to the adoption of the tax levy. The maximum ux levy must be adopted at cither the August 28 or September 11 Couiicil meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTSTED: Motion to select a date and time for a budget work session. 1 Kf REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Aug. 9. 19^.^, '%■V ITEM NO: Depiutment Approvi^^^^ Name Gary Cheswick _- Tklc Acting Police Chief Item besciiptSon: Request Disposal of Old Squad Car Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: CHy Administrator ’s Report The Police Department requests permission to dispt>se of a 1993 Ford Crown Victoria, (VIN #2FACi ’7lWXPX155435). Previously used in police patrol, and has been replaced by a new vehicle. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to sell vehicle to highest bidder as per city ordinance request for council action X DATE: August 1,1^^ % ITEM NO = Vo.Vo Department ApproTal: Name John Gcrfaardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item D«cription= Tempoory Easement Cos. - WMow Unvc/ Highway 12 Project In order to complete the upgrade to the Willow Drive/Highway 12 ‘"'"“f™"' ,0 acTu^ a temporaty easement from the property owner on the west side of Wtllow. other projects recently. It is recommended to purchase a temporary ’ easement from Gil and Anna Braun for an amount of S.IOOO. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To authorize payment for a .emporary easement from Gil and Anna Braun for an amount of 51,000 to be paid from the Municipal State Aid fund. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^ DATE: Aug. 11. 1995^^^ ■ % ITEM NO: '*<7 < % DepamiKiit Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorsc iCity Administrator’s Title City Administrator ___________Report__________________________________________ Item Description: Resolution & Agreement Regarding the Use of Hennepin Counts ’s Geographical Data Base Over a number of years Hennepin County has developed a computerized geographical data base which includes information related to all cities in the county. This information is now available to cities, at a nominal cost ($250) as the first step in developing a computerized mapping capability. The County requires a resolution and a conditional use agreement prior to releasing the information to the city. Both are attached for Council review and approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQLESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the city to enter into a conditional use agreement for the use of Hennepin County’s proprietary geographical data base and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the conditional use agreement. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ORONO TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF HENNEPIN COUNTY’S PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DATA BASE WHEREAS, the County has developed a proprietary geographical digitized data base which was designed and built to be used in conjunction with "Ultimap". an automated mapping facility sotWare product (which proprietary geographical digitized data base is hereinafter referred to as "Proprietary Data Base” and which is described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and hereby made a pan hereoty; and; WHEREAS, the City’ of Orono desires to use the County ’s Proprietary' Data Base in the course of conducting the City’s business; and WHEREAS, the County intends that any additions and modifications to the Proprietary Data Base relating to the County remain wholly compatible with the County s Proprietary ’ Data Base for the period of the copyright and information added to the database by either the County or the City shall be made available to either party; and; WHEREAS, in acknowledgement of the Entity’s above stated purpose, the County is agreeable to provide to the City the Proprietary' Data Base described in Exhibit A, and; W’HEREAS. the parties agree that the execution of this Agreement is necessary in order to adequately protect said Proprietary Data Base. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, as well as the obligations herein made and undertaken, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to the conditions set forth in the attached agreement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 14th day of August, 1995. /\rrEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothv M. Hallin, C;ty Cldrk i-v0 Agreement No CONDITIONAL USE AGREEMENT GOVERNMENT ENTITY AEreemenC the address ot the County is A703 Government Center. Minneapolis. MN sfiST-OOyj .nd the address of Entity Is 2750 Kelley Parkway. Orono. MN 5a35e. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County has developed a proprietary geographical digitized data base which was designed and built to be used in conjunction with bltimap an automated mapping facility software product (which proprietary 8®°8raphical digitized data base is hereinafter referred to as "Proprietary Data Base and which is described in Exhibit A. attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof). and aHEREAS. the Entity desires to us. the County's Proprietary Data Base in the course of conducting the Entity's business, and WHEREAS, the Countv intends that any additions and modifications to the Proprietarv Data Base relating to the County remain wholly compatible with the County's Proprietary Data Base for the period of the copyrignt and information added zo the database by either the County or the Entity shall be made available CO either party; and WHEREAS, in acknowledgement of the Entity's above stated purpose, County is agreeable to provide to the Entity the Proprietary Data Base described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS the parties agree that the execution of this Agreement is necessary in order to adequately protect said Proprietary Data Base; NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, as well as the obligacioAs herein made and undertaken, the parties hereto, intending to e legally bound, hereby agree as follows; Section 1 SCOPE OF AGP^EMENT 1.1 This agreement shall apply to Che Proprietary Data Base. 2.1 3.1 4.1 Seccifn 2 GRANT OF LIMITED LICENSE Th« County hereby grants the Entity a non-exclusive and nontransferable license to use the Proprietary Data Base. Said license shall commence on Che dace of approval of this agreement by the County and shall extend throughout the term of the copyright unless terminated sooner, in accordance with the provisions hereof. Sect! ACK.NOVLEDGMENT OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION RESERVATION OF TITLE The Entity acknowledges and agrees that the Proprietary Data Base are Che exclusive property of the County and include commercially valuable information which reflect the effort of skilled development experts and required the investment of considerable amounts of time and money, and that the County has treated such trade secret and Proprietary Data Ease as confidential information, which County encrusts to the Entity in confidence to use in the conduct of the Entity's business The Entity agrees that the County owns and reser/es all rights, protection and benefits afforded unde'r federal copyright law in all Proprietary Data Base furnished to the Entity as unpublished works, as well as all rights protection and benefits afforded under any other law relating to confidential and/or '' ide sec.et information respecting said Proprietary Data Ease, and that the Entity will abide by all relevant laws, rules, regulations and decisions which aftord protection Co the County for its confidential and trade secret information and said copyright. This agreement does not effect any transfer of title in or CO any Proprietary Data Base of the County. The Entity acknowledges that it is granted only a limited right of use of such Proprietary Data Base, which right is not coupled with an interest, and the entity shall not assert nor cause or cooperate w? th others to assert any right, title, or interest in any Proprietary Data Ease of the County. Section 4 PROTEcr-JN OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Obligations of confidentiality; Limitations of Use. The Entity shall neither disclose, furnish, stll, transrer nor disseminate, in whole or in part, the Proprietary Data Base of the County furnished to the Entity to (1) any ocher person, firm, entity, or organization, except as expressly authorized hereunder: or (2) any employee of Che Entity who does not need to obtain access thereto in connection with the Entity's exercise its rights under this agreement. Unless specifically authorized in writing by the County, the Entity shall not copy or otherwise reproduce any Proprietary Data Base of the County. Under no circumstances may the Entity disclose or disseminate any Proprietary Data Ease to any other public or private entity. The obligations of the Entity to protect confidentiality which are established by this Agree.ment apply to the Proprietary Data Base itself and not to any graphic representations or products produced by the Entity while using Che Proprietary Data Base. 4.2 4.3 rr ■ 4.4 4.5 CoapitlbU D«. Ba.. Modlflctloni. UnU.s oth.rai.. .xpUcUly dictionary (Exhibit D) provided by the County Agreeaant. To insure standardization and compatibility preexisting Proorletary Data base, the Entity agrees that any addiaons Ld modifications to the Proprietary Data Base shall be approved, in writing, bv the County. Requests for 5® Hap Project Reference Numbers contained in Exhibit C and the Symbol Di^.io^^^ry contained in Exhibit D shall be directed to and approved by the County Surveyor. Additions and modifications to the Proprietary Data shall be made available to the County for its use and any add..ions and modifications made by the County will be made available to the Entity f^r the conduct of Its business. Secure Handling. The Entity shall require C.hat all Propr'.tary Data Base be kept in a secure location ac 2750 Kelley Parxway, Orono, 55356 and maintained in a manner so as to reasonably persons from having access thereto. The Entity shal. devote its reasonable effortr to ensure that all persons afforded access to Proprietary Data Base protect same against unauthorized use. disLminatlon or disclosure. Except for off-site =;fckup. the Entity shall not remove or cause or allow to be removed from the Entity spa of business or the place of business of any Proprietary Data Base ^ copy thereof without the prior written consent ot the County, which consenc shall not be unreasonably withheld. Assistance of the Entity. At the request of the County and expense of the Entitv. the Entity shall use .^ood faith and reasonable ettorcs to assist the Councv in Identifying any use, copying, or disclosure of any Proprietary Data Base by any current or former Entity personnel - or anyone else who may have come in possession of said Proprietary ata Base while the same was in the Entity's possession - in any manner that is contrary to the provisions of this Agreement so long as the County shall have*provided the Entity with information reasonably justifying the conclusion of the County that such contrary use may have occurred. Sur/lval of Confidentiality Obligations. The Entity's obligations respecting confidentiality of the Proprietary Data Base shall su^ive cer.Tiination of this Agreement for any reason and shall remain in effect for as long as the Entity continues to possess or control any ^roorietarv Data Base furnished by the County. In acdition. the County shall'remaia entitled to enforce its copyright and proprietary interests in all Proprietary Data Base. 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 6.1 Section 5 TEiW. TEX-MINATIOS This sir..a.nc shall concinu. far ch. period of the copyright h.glnnlng frU rh. ^c. h.r.ot, unless sooner r.mlnat.d by either perry upon Chlrcv (30) calendar davs written notice to the ocher. The cerminatlon of this Agreeienc shall’autois.clc.lly and wichouc further action by the Councv ceralnace and extinguish the license, in the .^enc o ‘ tenslnation. the County shall have the right to possession of said ProprieC.r:/ Data Base, wherever Located, and without demand or notice^ Uithin after the cer.in.tlon of this Agr.e..nt. the Entity shall return the Proprietary Data Base, all copies thereof Co the County, or upon request br?he County, the Entity shall destroy all of the sa.~ and .11 copies thereof and certify <n writing to the County Chat the same has been destroyed. It is agreed that any right or remedy provided -.r herein *^.11 not be considered as the exclusive tigh- or remedy but shall be In addition to any ocher right or remedy her-under or allowed by la . equity or statuta. The County's failure to insist upon strict performance of any covenant agreement or stipulation of the contract, or h«ein contained shall not be a waiver or relinqursnnenc of such covenant, agreement, stipularion or right, unless the county thereto in writing. .^ny such written consent shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of such covenant, agreement, stipulation or right. Section 6 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF The Entity acknowledges and agrees - at disclosure or use of any confidential or Proprietary Data contained herein could cause irreparable harm and significant injury Co the County, which may be difficult to measure with certainty or to compensate through damages. Accordingly, the Entity agrees chat the County may seek and obtain azainsc the Encicy and/or any ocher person or encicy injunccive azainsc the breach or threatened breach of the foregoing undertakings, in addition to any other equitable or legal remedies which may be available. 4 7.1 7.2 b-’ 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7 . 7 Section 7 miscellaneous No Agency. The parties hereto are Independent contractors and nothing herein shall be construed to create an agency. JoiJ'C venture, partnership or other form of business association between the parties hereto. Iny such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof unless the same Is consented to In writing. A waiver by either of hereto of any of the covenants, conditions, or agreements .o be obse^ed by the other shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach thereof or of any co%enant. condition, or agreement herein contained. All remedies provided for cumulative and in audition to. and not In lieu of. any other remedies available to either party at law. In equity, or otherwise. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of .Minnesota. waiver, or discharge hereof shall be valid unless in writing an executed by the party against whom such change, waiver, or discharge is sought to be enforced. No Assign-ment. Neit.her party shall assign, sublet or transfer this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the ocher party, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no force and effect. T-HF entity agrees that the county is furnishing the proprietary data BASE ON an "AS IS" BASIS. WITHOUT ANY SUPPORT WHATSOEVER. AND WITHOUT representation OR WARRANTY. INCLUDING BUT NOT IN ANY MANNER LIMITED TO. FITNESS. MERCHANTABILITY OR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE proprietary data BASE. THE COUNTY'S SOLE LIABILITY A.ND THE ENTITY'S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY AGREEMENT. In no event snail the County be liable for actual, direct, indirec.. special, incidental, consequential damages (even if the County has been advised of the possibility of such damage) or loss of profit, loss ot business or any other financial loss or any other damage arising ouc^ot performance or failure of performance of this contract by the County. 7.8 7.9 7.10 Th« Entity shall defend, indemnify and hold the County. Its officers. clain. damages, costs. judsaenC* or expenses, including reasonable at«^.y*s fees, resulting directly or indirectly tro« any act or omissLol of the Entity. Its agents, employees, officers or in the performance of this contract, and (3) all loss by reason ot .he failure'^of said Entity to perform in any respect all obligations under this contract. Nothing herein shall be deemed a of the liiaications on liability provided in .Ivnn. §;at.. Ch. ‘♦66. Notice. Any notice or demand shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the ocher party address as follows. To The Entity:City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, .HN 55356 To Hennepin County Hennepin County Administrator .A-2 300 Government Center Minneapolis, M3J 55‘*87-0233 Copy to:Manager, Taxpayer Ser/ices A-600 Government Center Minneapolis, .M3J 5 548/-0060 Copy CO:Hennepin County Surveyor A-703 Goverrument Center Minneapolis, MN 55“87-0073 Whereas Clauses. The matters sec forth in the "Whereas" clause on pap one of Chi^ Agreement are incorporated into and made a part hereof by this reference. Sur^'ival of Provisions. It is expressly understood and agreed that the obligations and warranties of the Entity under Sections 3. 4, 5. 6. 7.6. 7 7 and 8.3 hereof and the obligations and warranties of the Entity which by their sense and context are intended to survive the performance thereof by the Entity, shall so survive the completion of performance and termination or cancellation of this Agreement. I Section 8rus 8.1 F««s for Ch« Proprietary Data Base shall be calculated pursuant to the •Pricine Pollcv for Products" contained in the County a AdalnLstratlve Manual Section P-9. The tens and conditions of payment are contained in Exhibit S and are made a part of this Agreement by reference hereto. 8.2 The full amount of the fee will be paid to the County no later than f-enty (20) days after receipt by the entity of an invoice for the Proprietary Data Base. 8.3 In the event the Entity and the County enter Into a contract subsequent hereto wherein the County furnishes to the Entity additional Proprietary Data Base, whether the same as or different from Che Proprietary Data Base described in Exhibit A. the t^^e and/or amount of fee charged hereunder shall in no manner preclude or affect the right County to charge the Entity for said additional Proprietary Data Base (at a cocxaerctal race pursuanc to che authority of the Count/). j J ii v.-it «■ Entity, hnvins .UMd thU contract, and th. County h.vine duly approv.d tract on _____________________■ 1 ’------;iq ana pursuant avitu Ind%Srpnp.%°gounty omtUI havlnt-l8;.rsi. contract, th. parti., h.r.to agree to be bound by the provisions herein sec foru.h. Approved as to legality form and execution. Assistant County Attorney Dace: 8 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MI.NNESOTA County Ad-ninistracor Date: City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, KN 55356 Bv: Title;MAYOR And: T^rld.- OIFRK / ClTi M.ANAGEK (Plan A City)-(Plan B City) EXHIBIT A OF AGREEMENT 1. 2. 3. PROPP.IETARY DATA BASE PROVIDED TO (THE ENTITY) BY THE COUNTY R«spons« CO a Use of daca bass elemencs requested Indicating which data Is available from Hennepin County's "MAPS" data base. ULTIMAPS data base extract format and requested d'-a from Hennepin County s “MAPS" data base for segments and/or records requested In Item #1. PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM daca base extract formats and requested daca for Che following daca bases to facilitate locating property addresses, and ownership daca. a. Current Year Tax data base extract format (PID02). miBiT 1 OF ACRZEMENT PAYllENt TEIIMS AND CONDITIONS Pursuant to the Hennepin County Pricing Policy for Products as Hennepin County Political Subdivision are as .ollows. ** Personnel Services - base salary current year overhead rates Supplies - tape, disk, cartridge, etc. •* Current Year Tax Data Base Extract (PID02) $ 40.24 $ 1.50 • 25.00 $ 200.00 « Ih.5. ch«g.. Will b. .djwst.d by =■=“"'=5' year subsequent to the execution of this contract. 10 EXHIBIT C OF AGREEMENT HENJIEPIS COUNTY MAP PROJECT REFERENCE NUMBER USAGE To keep the Property Maps Data Base corapacible within the scope of available reference nuabers, it is hereby required that the Entity restrict its activity to the range of reference numbers that fall between: 3.156.000.000 - 3,160,999.999 If the Entity is creating dac« bases for purposes wherein compatibility is not an issue, then the above restriction does not apply. 11 EXHIBIT D OF ACJLEE:i£NT hennsfis county hap project symbol dictionary To ke«D Che Property Maps Data Base compatible within the dictionary usage of all TO keep cne rropercy .^aps uaw* ^ distribution network to: end users, it is hereby required of the users in cr.e 1 UcUl-e sp«c.i In th. Synbol Dictionary fro. .nrry nunbec 1600 no.'b.r 3200 Nunb.rs 0-1699 will b. r.a.rv.d for futur. expansion. 2. Coordination of additions or change, within existing symbols with the Hennepin County Suir/eyors Office Syrcbol Coordinator. 3. Do not ellnlnate leans from the parent categories of Property, Survey and/or Waterway. If Che Entity is creating data bases for purposes wherein compatibility is not an issue then restriction does not apply. J 'fo,/» '(T , V DATE: Aug. 10.^995, ^Sf.>. /6p. ■ ’ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Adminis^tor Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Long Lake Water Quality Project On Tuesday, August 8, staff met with Tom LaBounty the MCWD’s Lead Manager on th«: Long T water quality project to get an update on the project and to review a revised project agreement. Project Update . . . , The overall project consists of the excavation or e.ilargement of four detention ponds and alum treatment of Long Lake. The detention pond portion of the project includes enlarging two ponds on the Lone Lake park land adjacent to the lake, e.xcavating a 2.5 acre two-stage pond facilit)' in Orono south of County Road 6 on the Pierce property, and excavating a 6 acre pond facility on Deer Hill Road in Medina. The MCWD has worked out an agreement with Long Lake regarding both the ponds and the prv)ject. They also have an agreement with the 'ierces regarding the 2.5 acre pond. They do not at this time have an agreement regarding the pond in Medina. Although the agreement with the Pierces includes a provision regarding a potential larger pond, the MCWD has made the determination that the large pond will be located on the Deer Hill Road property in Medina and not on the Pierce property. The proposed schedule for the project includes the excavation ot the Long Lake pond and the Deer Hill Road pond durinc the winter of 1Q95/T996. and the excavation of the pond on the Pierce property in the winter of 1997/1998. The alum treatment of Long I.ake is planned for the spring of 1996. P.oiect Agreement , - ^ • .A new draft of the cooperative agreement tor the project is attached tor Council review. The draft is much simplirieJ from the original. The agreement includes two items under city responsibilities that require additional discussion. One is the requirement for the city to prepare i local management plan for the sub-watershed district served by the water quality project. The acreement provides that the city will prepare the management within 120 days of receiving the technical eneineerinu information regarding the project. Staff has indicated; first, that the L.0 day period is too short and secondly, it is not clear how much time, effort and cost would be Request for Council Action page 2 of 2 August 10, 1995 Long Lake Water Quality Project involved in preparing the local water management plan for the sub-watershed area. Staff will review this with the City Engineer and with the MCWD’s engineer. The second major item under city responsibilities is the city’s contribution toward the annual sediment removal from the detention pond. Mr. LaBounty indicated the estimated annual cost of the sediment removal is approximately $63,000. The MCWD will pay something more than 50% of that cost. The agreement calls for the city to pay an amount not to exceed $7,000 per year toward these costs. Staff will review these projected costs with the City Engineer to determine if they are reasonable cost estimates. Mr. LaBounty has requested the Council schedule a work session for discussion of the cooperative asreement. The need for the work session is dependent upon the number of questions and level of concerns the Council has regarding the agreement. The City Engineer has raised concerns rega- . ..g the project in relation to the pond proposed in the city of Medina. Part of the review of the project and agreement should include an evaluation of the project by the city’s engineer. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Provide direction to staff regarding what information and discussion the Council needs for its consideration of the project and the cooperative agreement. If this consideration requires a work session, select a date and time for the work session. PJG-=CIJ “1995 . li;9€ MU#€HHha CPE=K l.iaTc?:i“SD i5l247679T3 P.01'10 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT iOliininv * I * ^ 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 611 Twelve Oaks Center Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 r \ /o offlct; (612) 476-7970 fa*. ^6i2) 476-7973 \ bAAC mwmviQNiUk 60AH0 OF IIANiUsEilS: John E. TTicms. Pr-siier^t PsTiri 3 3iixt Vtc« Presidsn:; I Harrfiti. Secrtury: Thomas W. LaBounty, Traasnrar Mon;ca Grcsa, C. WcoGfOvi Leva Thomas Mapie. Jr; DisUict OirtctCf Stremmao___________ Mr. Ron Moorse, City Administrator Qty or Orono 2710 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55?23 RE: Lan» Lake Improvement Project - Draft Cooperative Agreement Dear Mr. Moorse: In preparation for our meeting on Tuesday, August 8. enclosed please find a draft Cooperative Agiccmcnt for the Long Lake Improvement Project. This <^aft cont.ains a number of re’/isions intended to simplify the Agiecmem and be responsive to Chty concems. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers will be discussing this draft Agreement at its meeting on Thursday, August 10. Our hope is that both parties can aulhcrizc execution of the Agreement before the end of August. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me at 475-2226 (work), or 475-3453 (home) if you ha^'e any questions. Very truly yours. 7 Thuma.s W. LaBuuniv Manager TLL:dh si7aao500.^SM/?5 Ci ittifiiaodA i m i L • 1*5 I ft I «i .. « *■ **• % DRAFT COOPER.VTIVE agreement for Uic Lung L^c Iinprovcjnent Project This Cocreriuve Agreement is mada on this-----day of 1995. by and between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnet (hereinafter referred to as "MCWD"). a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D, and the City of Orono (hereinafter referred to as -Giy"). a body corporate and poUUc and a statutory city In the State of Minnesota. 1. <;tntement of Purpose WHEREAS, Lon^^ Lake is situated approximately two miles north of Lake Minnetonka in western Hennepin County and its watershed, encompassing an area of 6.860 acres, includes the Gty of Lon«: Lake and portions of Orono and Medina; where .VS. Long Lake has a public boat landing and public swimming beaches; the lake has been used historically for recreation and has a high potential for future recreational use. but water quality degradation currently impain swimming and fishing; WHEREAS, the Long Lake subwatershed drams into Lake Minnetonka and, ultimately, the Minnehaha Creek corridor. ConsequenUy. any improvements to waicr quality in Long Lake w-ll have .a po.sitive, disiiict wide efreci; WHEREAS, in 1989. the MC3VD received a Clean Water Partnership Grant to invesUs ale lake water quality and charac’,eri2e and quantify the sources contributing to the decline in water quality; thereafter, the MCWD proceeded to develop an implementation plan r►m «• «i c*.r“« ^ (hexcinafter "Implementalioa Plan") to set (ot± specific actions to be undertaken to improve tin: water quality'; ^’HERB.A.S, the MCWD has an approved Water Reso’orces Management Plan which identifies Long Lake a piioiity resource, and the MCWD’s Capital Improvement Program identifies water quality improvement projects in the Long Lake area as priority projects; WHEREAS, the City has, ±rough its governing body, expressed support for the Long Lake Impioveinent Project; WHEREAS, Lho parties adcnowlcdge that their ability to improve the water quality in Long I-a kr- in accordance with the Implementation Plan is dependent upon each party satisfactorily and promptly perfonning its individual obligations and working cooperatively with the other piuty as to those tasks which are to be jointly undertaken; NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties that they enter into tJiis Cooperative Agrccmenr in order to document the understanding of the parties as to the scope of the entire project; reaffirm the commitmisni of each party as to the general fesponsiallitics and tasks to be uaderjiken by each party; establish procedures for perfonning thesi tasks and rcsponsibilidcs; xnd facilitate communication and cooperation among the partit s to ensure successful completion of the project through the construction of stormwater treacnent systems to reduce nutrient loadings, implementation of best watershed management pnirtices. in-lakc irr.provcmcn»,s. xnd public education programs, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of improving water Qualid in Long Lake. 53?/2I039ii9 / 2. Deflniticns For the p urposos of this document, the following tenns shall have the meanings given in this paiagraplL 2.1. ’•Jmprovemenis" refe« coUec-ively to the foUou,*ing stormwater treatment systems: chemi-tal treatment, sediraentatioa basir.s. detsnticn/retention of runoff, stormwater dl\'ersions, restoration of wet detention pondAvctland areas, and construction of wet detention ponds/wetland tieatment systems. 2.2 "Idonitoring Plan’’ shall mean the water qualiry monitoring plan developed to identify the .specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quality assurance and quality control procedures in order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseline data and any changes in water quality throughout lh.e Long Lake subwatershed for the duration of this project 3. General Responsi bilities of Parties 3.1. MCWD The MOVD shall be responsible for the design, construction, and technical maintenance and operation of Ihe stormwater treatment systems for the purpose of reducing internal and external phosphorous loading into Long Lake. These sy.slems shall consist of sedimentation b2sins, deteniion/retention of runoff, stormwater diversions, restoration of wet detention pond/v^etland areas, construction of wet rietemion ponds/weiland treatment systems specifically designed to remove nutrients from stormwater runoff, ,md chemical treatment in Long Lake to reduce internal cyclin® of nutrients and fisheries management in conjunction with the DNR. JJ7/22C89JV7 8/.V95 i fr ----* 4 .‘•V - * A • • •. I*. • **3.1.1. The parties anticipate the use of aliun in Long Lake to reduce in-lake phosphorous loading. The panies dso anticipate the construction of four wet detention ponds/wetiaads to treat extemal phosphorous loading; one bet’*‘ecn County Road No. 6 and the DNR protected wetland adjacent to the north sice of Long Lake, one near Deer Hill Road in Medina, iwo connected basins adjacent to Long Lake in a city dcsionated p.irk and adjoining private property. These systems will be selected and designed by MCWD, based upon a determination of their feasibility. 3.1.2. The MCWTD will pay for the installation of structural fish barriers at the outlet of the Long Lake Qty Park wet detention pond/wedand, and at the outlet of the County Road No. 6 wet dfiteniion pond/weiland. subject to assumption of the ongoing barrier maintenance and cleaning by the City, as discussed below in paragraph 3.2.4 of this Agreement. 3.1.3. The .MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of the contracior or contractors to perfoim the construction of the ordered improvements in a man.ner consistent with stale law. The MCWD shall also be responsible for the negotiation of construction contracts, and the super/ision of the project construction. 3.1.4. The .MCWD shall be responsible for planning and conducting any necessary environmental re'/iews in connection with the ordered Lniprovements. 3.1.5. The MCWD shall be responsible for obtaining any governmental permits, and private approvalii or property rights nscessarv' for the coastruction, maintenance, and operation of the impiovejnents. jiT/eaodis'/f 8M/95 4 .fc ^ • ^ r, 3.1.6. 1*he MCWD will be responsible for obuining the necessary permits, obtaining the necesstty cheaucals, and conducting treatment and monitoring results at Long Lake with alum to reduce phosphorous concentrations in those lakes. 3.1.7. llie MCWD shall be responsible for preparing a plan for the operation mid maintenance (hereinafter "Maintenance Plan") of the improvements, including ongoing monitoring, and presenting such a plan to the Project Advisory Committee for review and comment pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement. The MCWD shall also specify in this Maintenance Plan how the Plan will be implemented. 3.1.8. Tlie MCWT) shall be responsible for the entire project costs associated with the feasibility analy;;is, design, operation, and maintenance of the improvements, subject to City responsibility for sediment removal costs and fish barrier maintenance as described in paragraph 3.2.3 of this .Agreement. 3.1.9. Tlic MCWD agrees that the MCWD District Engineer’s feasibility reports and designs for the improvements in the area of the Long Laite subwatershed. as identified in the map attached to this Agreement for reference as Appendix A, shall be provided to the City; ftirther. the MC^VD agrees that these documents may constitute a substantial basis for the preparation of the local water management plans for the City for the area identified in Appendix B, and that upon proper endorsement, completion, and resubmittal of these documents to the MCWD. the .MCWD wiU approve them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdiviiiou .V ‘•37/2’OS939r • • \ X \.r\ I »• \.' . \ * ' ■ 'i' • . • \ • • 3^ City Responsibilities 3.x 1. T2C Gly agrees to prepare a local water management plan, as required by Minnesota Statutes Sccdon 1033.235, subdivisions 1 and 2. for the area of the Long Lake subwttershed idintified in Appendix B to this Agreement, based upon the feasibility reports, design plans, and specifications for this project prepared by the MCWD and any other relevant information identified by the City, including plans for Implementing best management practices as provided for in sub-paragraph 3.2.2 of tliis paragraph to this Agreement; the City agrees that within 120 days of receiving the technical information from the MCWD, the City will prepare and submit its local water management plan for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed l>ing within the City to the MCWD for its review and approval pursuant to \Iin.iesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdivision 3. 3.2.2. The City agrees to develop policies and disseminate information, subject to paragraph 5.3 of this Agrccmenr. on a variety of best management practices relating to water quality, including but not limited to the following; -yard waste iiuinagcment -urban fertilizer manogciuenl -livestock waste management -agricultural practices While the City may use its discretion in developing the specific details of the policies, the City must develop a plan for best manage.ment practices and include such plan in its local water management plan, as provided in sub-paragraph 3.2.1 of this paragraph to tliis Agreement. 517/?:o»5897 l'v9S 3.2.3. Toe Gty agrees to contribute to a maintenance fund to cover the sediment removal costs of die wet detention ponds/wetlands, as defined in the Maintenance Plan described in paragraph 3.1.7 of iHs Agreement, in an amount not to exceed S7.000 per year during the term of this Agreement. The City’s contribution for this purpose may be made either through a direct financial contiihudon to the MCWD’s maintenance fund established for this project, or through in-kind services provided by the Qty for sediment removal or fish barrier maintenance described in paragraph 3.2.4. In the event that the Gty contributes more than S7.000 in in-kind services in a given year. MCWD agrees to reimburse the City for the amount which c.icccd.s 57,000. 3.2.4. The City of Orono agrees to be responsible for any necessary cleaning associated with rhe structural fish bardtr to be installed at the County Road 6 wet detention pontl/wetJand. 4. Monito r nn Plan MCWD agrees to ds''clop and implement a water quality monitoring plan ("Monitoring Plan”) which wUl identifj' the specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quahty assurance and quality control procedures m order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseUne data and any changes in water quality throughout the Long Lake subwaicrsted for the duration of this project. The Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and comment before any actions implementing the Monitonng Plan are commenced. The MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of a qualified laboratory to perform the data analysis required by the Monitoring Plan and shaU be responsible for the costs of the laboratory sample analysis. The MCWT) agrees to provide the data anlysis 537,':20S589t 8/4/95 « • *» • 40. pursuant to the Monitoring Plan to the Project Advisory Coduniftee described in paragraph 5.1, anrf the Cit^^ agrees that its representative on the Cosimittce shall be responsible fer providing this irformation to the City. 5.Proiect Advisory Coirimittee 5.1. The City agrees to appoint a represeataiive to serve on a Project Advisory Coniniittee to provide coordination, commujiicalion, and advice in guiding the iniplenientation of the Project. The Project Advisory Committee shall also be responsible for coordinating the public education efforts by the Cities, as provided in paragraph 3.2.2 of this Agreement. SJ2. The members of the Prcjeci Advisory Committee shall consist of one representative from each of the citie.s participating in the Ph’ojecf, and one representative from the MCWD. who will serve as the chair of the Committee. 5.3. All written, audio, or video public education materials prepared by any partv' shall be presented to th' * --.cc* Advisor:/ Committee for review and comment prior to their distribution; all <iducatio.nal materials disuibuted to die public must identify each party to the Agreement as a project sponsor. Project tTnordinator 6.1. The MOV’D Board of Managers shall te responsible for appointing the Project Coordinator, to nerve ai the MOVD’s expense. The Project Coordinator shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Project; coordinating communication beCAcen the parties to tliis Agreement; and preparing quarterly progress reports to the Project .Advisory Committee. 537/2I0HQ?i97 • • • 7. Renewal and Terrrdnaiion of Agreenienl This Agreement shaJl teiminate on December 31,2000, and may be renewed for another live year term by written agreement of all parties hereto. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by the written agreement of all parties bercro. $.Amendments This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 9.Notice Notices to the parties to the Agreement shall be given by hand delivery or first class majl addressed to the following icpicscntalives of each party to this Agreement: [insert list] [Signatures] JJ7/‘::C89897 6/-V95 - ^ * I f* • fc % A. ift REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '<5 j DATE: Aug. 10, 1995 ^ 'a •% V ITEM NO: / 7 Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Item Description: Licenses Administrator Reviewed: 7/^v Agenda Section: Licenses SITE EVALUATOR/DESIGNER LICENSE Dev. • ipment Engineering, P.A. 9051 Flying Cloud Dr Eden Prairie ONE DAY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Paula Prahl Smith College Days Minnetonka Center for the Arts 2240 North Shore Drive September 9, 1995 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses iilL.>' f cmrcFcrc\o =31r J SITE EVALUATOR/DESIGNER LICENSE APPLICATION 'JUL ^ i 1995 CITY OF ORONO (612) 473-7357 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 All questions must be answered. License fee and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval peno . Business or trade name (street) / ^ iy 1 ^ Business phone (d\. y Residence phone------->-2 »U .y2-------------- Nameof applicant or company representati^s) holding MPCA certitication-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Type of certmcacion held: hie evaluaiof(»r^ ___System designer Certificate expiration __________________---------------------C-P^X-------------------- 1. 2. 3. 4. Business address 5. 6. 7. Have you ever performed site evaluation or design work in Orono betore.- —y Most recent year Have you ever had a license revoked? /V^ _ Wlien? ------------------------ Where? _____________________________________—-------- SUBMITTALS REQUIRLl): [. SI00.00 License fee. 2. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. .T.tr* . w. . . V - Ti-rru C I XL r * aT. •» m LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL .ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMI H L. Tlie undersigned hereby makes application to the City ot Orono, Minnesota, tor a license to perform site evaluation and septic system design subject to the laws of the State of Mmnesou and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. ^ ^ •. II.-rr^-r .r- ♦ ^ u * V* t L'V .. ;i- .r,li 7. J . ■ ■ 1 w* • n.ate rSA Applicant’sSigna’sSicnaKre CITY Staff recommendation; Approval Denial____ Date / ^ — Reason for denial: ___________________USE ONLY City Council .Action; Date Date license mailed_____ Approved Denied __ - ^. Date: To: From: Re: August 3, 199S Ron Moorse, City Administrator Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police One Day On-Sale Liquor License Smith College Club I have reviewed the application of Paula Prahl on behalf of the Smith College Club. This club has held this function at the Minnetonka Art Center for several years and we have not received any complaints. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. M^mesota Oeptrtmaoi o( Pubfic SaieiyLIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 190 5th St. E.. SI. Paul. MN 55101 (612) 296-6430 TDD (612) 297-2100 I . K®APPLICATION AND PERMIT fora 1 to 3 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE rm OP WWWTINPOAMATIQN NAMC 0* OPGANIZATtON Sm-lt' Ctu.b ^ AlutivSciTi.^ 0AT£ O«GANl2f0 Kl NO. OP members Auv TAX *X£M?T NUMBEP 4\ - H()^ 2b^ STPcrrAooPESS ^ • % uIt*. P*"'-'*-I 2*4*^*^ Cl;a.,iC| t.t.cU C ity Zif^COOg 4“ NAMi OF PERSON MAKING APPLICATION Pd Rtf' PtaH) DATES LIQUOR WtU 6E SOLO’ <1 TO 3 DAYS! S\p k:.H OPQANI2ATION OPPICEB'S NAME pCtutiX U\ , Pf/^ifL «v(: OBOANIZATION OPPICEft^S name ^ . StViitTu PfCOiCU^t ;ANI7AnON OPPtCEft S NAME HOME PHONE (i,2) muBUSINESS PHONE , (6i2> 523 2. _______________ DOES OBCANizATION HAVE A CHARTER GENERAL PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATIO? ^ yt% □ Nc .^(i4vrc4 HwmaI c*^0i»oI z*» ACOBESS ^ address , ^ , U2iy 5 Dr. A>I aJ OBO- 1/ u4r< c'f K-'tx fK plAft. ADDRESS .. Lirlivtff^ Ay6 ~>l- tT(A.IL/' ^'^ILS Locition wbAfB Uc«ft*B w3l bB ut#d. It «n outdoor *fea. describe. L: tv n„. A ^ 2240 / |Ci|t.hcn j Will th* the stfvicf 4«r 1^- ent contract for intoxict.ng l-cuor se. v.ces? II so. give the nan^e .nd address of the Uouor licensee orov-d-ng K)o WiH the eoolicant carry liQuOr liability insurance? II so. tne earner s name and amount of coverage. (Note:Insurance is not mandatoryl Mo APPflOVAl. CITY OF <2^1gjOOO CITY FEE AMOUNT DATE FEE PAO SIGNATURE CITY CLERK DATE approved LICENSE DATES APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR TOTAL P.Ol I'3 i i'y'’- 5» .<V A ' ^>V^-> ,-V cij-'' // % 07/30/95 PR: CB PRREGOR — 258 YTD CURRENT EMP *NAME DPT GROSS GROSS 472204554 ALCH, JEROME S.93 495.90 59.85 471638060 ANDERSON, BRUCE L 31 30590.28 1810.04 474563339 BOBZIEN, SUE A 31 17240.07 1071.20 476921919 BORIS, SCOTT W 31 19812.74 1204.89 471940871 BOSMA, JAMIE L.12 9611.42 629.27 475443862 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F 42 26496.00 1656.00 468113870 CALLAGHAN, JEREMIAH 35 2363.03 313.66 468843008 CARLSON, MICHAEL B 31 5558.37 437.61 472503991 CHESWICK, GARY B 31 28940.29 1945.6C 469526026 CORNICK, JAMES L 31 29816.13 1974.11 475999721 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C 31 29862.82 1892.78 468821018 ENGLISH III, IRVING 31 27635.32 1581.36 468622840 ERICKSON, DOUGLAS J 93 575.25 156.00 472529007 ERICKSON, KURT R 31 25557.69 1495.69 468701868 FISCHENICH, DAN T 31 26762.00 2164.48 470089708 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER 35 1019.32 102.89 469686562 GAFFRCN, MICHAEL P 33 24846.72 1555.52 468420832 GERHARDSON, JOHN R 42 37546.23 2357.73 474667812 GREGORY, JAMES D 42 20867.35 1163.05 475380151 HALLIN, DOROTHY M 12 21404.19 1340.00 477500666 HANSEN, STEVEN C 42 19805.35 1261.62 475444249 HA^JSING, CAROL J 31 10365 46 847.96 477463877 HASEMAT4, CAROLE 12 17128.97 1081.24 471569863 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P 31 27384.73 1807.91 473141624 JCSTROM, FOREST J 93 1258.60 243.60 471848180 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN 31 6521.19 475.40 472500574 KUEHN, THOMAS M 15 36554.45 2288.48 121262417 MABUSTH, JEANNE A 33 31117.10 1948.07 475344512 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E 93 2281.60 266.80 480843542 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L 31 27210.67 1957.90 477561040 MELTON, NEIL W.31 2129.19 123.43 470987727 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER 15 18363.97 1180.32 477700023 MOORSE, RONALD J 12 40791.03 2649.44 334506281 MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES 31 27541.85 1611.52 477028779 NELSON, DAVID D.35 540.22 96.47 473108428 CAS, DANIEL 0 93 2346.70 313.10 468909535 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G 42 19959.62 1143.60 476783251 OBRIEN, RANDY L 92 20069.56 1143.60 476866274 OLSON, JOHN C.15 15679.72 1017.60 470700901 OMAN, LYLE E 33 24846.70 1555.52 469846107 PALMER, GREGORY A 42 19054.85 1143.60 471487919 FERSELL, WILLIAM R.31 5409.31 134.65 474167795 PETERSON, JACK W 9^3086.55 265.05 475392983 QUAST, WAYNE A 92 32584.91 10196.60 473746173 RATHBUN, BARRY J 92 20015.95 1503.29 473609629 ROSS, JOHN A 93 890.30 37.70 468320409 RUTHER, ALVIN C.93 521.55 96.90 470566529 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B 31 20078.94 1475.98 469629194 SKREEN, DALE S 42 20337.58 1604.75 475569177 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD •;3 21404.16 1340.00 472563051 THOMTON, MARK R 31 25850.37 1501.37 474663296 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F 31 27019.03 1655.49 470704904 TCMC2YK, MARK W 31 25784.30 1611.52 475505292 VANG, BRUCE L 33 21002.15 1340.00 468629488 VEE, LINDA S 12 17552.44 1001.24 471067937 WALKER, NATHAN T.93 390.00 390.00 471067937 WALKER, NATHAN T.93 867.00 477.00 477831539 WECKl^AN, STEPHEN J 33 19846.45 1242.49 75,191.34 YTD CURRENT EMP #NAME DPT GROSS GROSS 469138026 CALLAHAN , edwapj: j 11 2400.00 300.00 13324677 GOETTEN,J.DIAxNN 11 1933.36 241.67 470366069 HURR, JCELLEN L 11 1933.36 241.67 473646272 JABBOUR,GABRIEL 11 1933.36 241.67 476527186 KELLEY,CHARLES 11 1933.36 241.67 1,266.68 s s • ' *1OUHCIL HBCR VC \k ■iCHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 3 > CHECK DATE CHECK AHOUHT 1995 00:39:37VENDOR DESCRIPTICai ACCOUNT tt INVOICE \Page 1- PO NUM. MANUAL 03348S 1995/08/02 $5,671.00 $5,671.00* CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS N/H & TRANSP 9999-2030 003052 OH 1995/08/02 $3,604.40 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA,MEDC 9999-2032 003046 OH 03368C 1995/08/02 $12,883.25 $16,487.65* FIRST NATIONAL RANK OF PIT,PICA,MEDCR W/H 9999-2030 003046 OH 033687 1995/08/02 $41,913.50 $41,913.50* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL 9999-2030 003048 OH 033€8I 1995/08/02 $1,490.00 $1,490.00* GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003055 OH 033689 1995/08/02 $164.82 $164.82* HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR THOMTON IC0266780 9999-2030 003051 OH 033690 1995/08/02 $174.50 $174.50* HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR SKREEN UC0262310 9999-2030 003050 OH 033691 1995/08/02 $100.00 $100.00* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003054 OH 033692 1995/08/02 $420.00 $420.00* LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR UNION DUES W/H 9999-2030 003049 OH 033693 1995/08/02 $3,521.51 $3,521.51* MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVF STATE TAX W/H 9999-2030 003047 OH 033694 1995/08/02 $55.00 $55.00* MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003056 OH 033695 1995/08/02 $100.00 $100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003057 OH 033696 1995/08/02 $210.77 $210.77* PEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003059 OH 033697 1995/08/02 $1,085.00 $1,085.00* PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYO DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 003056 OH 1995/08/02 $5,060.10 PERA PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2031 003060 OH 1995/08/02 $3,573.74 PERA PERA W/H 9999-2030 003060 OH 033698 1995/08/02 -$2.29 $8,631.55* PERA OVERPAYMENT 6/19-7/2 9999-2031 003060 OH 033699 1995/08/02 $29.00 $29.00* UNITED WAY ACCT #0750000B 9999-2030 003053 OH $80,054.30 eowciL cmcK 3 J«5 00.3,„1• 999 PAYROLL CLEARI^...............$80,054.30$80,054.30 Page I •w<CCXJMCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 199S 00:29:36 Page 1CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL1995/08/14 $58.80 A T 1: T CELL PHONE UTILITIES 0549-4325 003072 OH1995/08/14 $58.81 A T fc T CELL PHONE UTILITIES 0569-4320 003072 OH 033703 $117.61* 1995/08/14 $39.54 ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPLACE RED LAMP 0249-4346 9272-40 OH 033704 $39.54* 1995/08/14 $127.56 ALL STAR PRO GOLF CO CLUB,SPIKES RENTAL 0590-4331 29879 OH 033705 $127.56* 1995/08/14 $2,981.25 AMERICAN NATL BANK INT DUB 9/1/95 0907-4620 003106 OH 033706 $2,981.25* 1995/08/14 $745.00 ANCHOR SCIENTIFIC INC.ROTO FLOATS 0569-4344 81030 OH 033707 $745.00* 1995/08/14 $26.72 AT 6; T WIRELES SERVICE CELL PHONE-GERHARDSO 0099-4320 003064 OH 033708 $26.72* 1995/08/14 $3.41 ATtT INFO SYSTEM BUS LONG DISTANCE 0129-4320 003067 OK 1995/08/14 $15.20 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM BUS. LONG DISTANCE 0099-4320 003103 OH 1995/08/14 $5.30 ATRT INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0549-4320 003108 OH 1995/08/14 $44.05 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM MAI*^T-AUG 0129-4340 003076 OH 1995/08/14 $19.55 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN 0129-4320 003079 OH 1995/08/14 $5.30 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0590-4320 003077 OH 1995/08/14 $14.70 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0129-4320 003075 OH 1995/08/14 $6.48 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0099-4320 003074 OH 1995/08/14 $5.30 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM BUS. LONG DISTANCE 0129-4320 003083 OH 033709 $119.29* 1995/08/14 $42.34 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF SANDWICHES FOR RESAL 0591-4802 27932 OH 1995/08/14 $52.20 AUGIBS MOBILE CHEF SANDWICHES FOR RESAL 0591-4802 27426 OH 1995/08/14 $39.50 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF COFFEE 0591-4802 20430 OH 033710 $134.04* 1995/08/14 $130.52 BIFFS INC AUG-SUMMIT BEACH 0290-4331 BI054973 OH 1995/08/14 $130.52 BIFFS INC AUG-BEDERWOOD PARK 0290-4331 BI054974 OH 1995/08/14 $65.26 BIFFS INC AUG-GOLF COURSE 0590-4331 BI054971 OH 1995/08/14 $130.52 BIFFS INC AUG-HACKBERRY PARK 0290-4331 BI054972 OH 033711 $456.82* 1995/08/14 $293.89 BLACKOWIAK fc SON JULY SERVICE 0290-4343 181649 OH 1995/08/14 $70.44 BLACKOWIAK fc SON JULY SERVICE-GOLF CO 0590-4343 181679 OH 1995/08/14 $168.58 BLACKOWIAK fc SON JULY SERVICE 0099-4343 181623 OH 033712 $532.91* 1995/08/14 $513.00 BONESTROO ROSENS ASN PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRA 0200-4305 034646 OH 1995/08/14 $130.00 BCNESTROO ROSENE ASN WATER PLANT STUDY-MA 0549-4305 034644 OH 1995/08/14 $198.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN LEAD/COPPER STUDY-MA 0549-4305 034643 OH 1995/08/14 $128.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG L.S. #7 REHAB 9673-1600 034642 OH CXXmciL CHECK RB6ISTBR thu Aug 10 1995 00:29:3£CHBCK IfO CHBCK DATS CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM,Page 2 MANUAL 033713 033714 033715 033716 033717 033710 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/00/14 1995/00/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/00/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/00/14 1995/00/14 1995/00/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $100 $481 $1,441 $571 $342 $65 $0,279 $4 02 $342 $97 $25 $13,117 .00 .16 .87 .18 .00 .00 .38 .25 .00 .50 .75 .59* $325.00 $388.35 $85.42 $798.77* $91.53 $3.20 BONBSTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONBSTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ROSENB ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN BORIS,SCOTT BORIS,SCOTT BORIS,SCOTT BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING MAY ENGINEERING OCB RD BRIDGE ’.JSP-M MAY APPLICATIONS BRONN RD INSP UB INFO RBiWAYZATA A 1 k I PROGRAM-MAY WILLOW DRIVE INSP HWY 12 SAFETY INSP OCB RD ALIGNMENT PLA DRAINAGE 455 N. FERN MSA GENERAL-MAY TUITION REIMBURSEMEN UNIFORM REIMB. BIKE PATROL UNIFORM LETTERHEAD LARGE COPY 0200 0355 0840 0360 0200 0569 0362 0358 0200 0200 0200 4304 ■4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 0129-4356 0129-4221 0129-4221 0129-4322 0099-4322 $11.18 BUDGET PRINTING 6 LARGE COPIES 0099-4322 $105.91* $97.98 CANVAS PLUS INC.TARP 0249-4232$87.33 CANVAS PLUS INC.TARP 0249-4232$185.31* $68.96 CUANNING L. BETB CO.CRIME PREVENT PAMPHL 0129-4322$60.96* $212.21 CHUNKS GARAGE ALIGNMENT #169 0129-4341$56.36 CHUNKS GARAGE REPAIR WINDOW SWITCH 0129-4341$155.23 CHUNKS GARAGE ELEC REPAIR #173 0129-4341$56.69 CHUNKS GARAGE REPAIR MIRROR #170 0129-4341$180.05 CHUNKS GARAGE SVC PACKAGE #169 0129-4341$92.89 CHUNKS GARAGE FIX SEAT #171 0129-4341$753.43* $16.71 CITY OF LONG LAKE OCT WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$18.41 CITY OF LONG LAKE NOV WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$20.88 CITY OF LONG LAKE DEC WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$20.02 CITY OF LONG LAKE JAN WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$16.71 CITY OF LONG LAKE FEB WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$72.42 CITY OF LONG LAKE MAY HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344$16.65 CITY OF LONG LAKE MAR WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$72.46 CITY OF LONG LAKE JUN HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344$16.68 CITY OF LONG LAKE APR WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$13.94 CITY OF LONG LAKE MAY WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$14.61 CITY OF LONG LAKE JUN WILLOW/HWY 12 0249-4324$68.10 CITY OF LONG LAKE OCT HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 034636 034638 034636 034641 034636 034636 034639 034636 034636 034636 034637 003111 003084 003068 10599 10760 10665 12293 12265M 5854-555.01 6512 6537 6588 6397R 6568 6620 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 4H 6F 41 6G CH 61 4A CHI OHt OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COOHCIL C3IECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 1995 00:29:35 Pag« 3CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL1995/08/14 $58.30 CITY OP LONG LAKE NOV HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 4B OH 1995/08/14 $59.95 CITY OP LONG LAKE DEC HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 4C OH 1995/08/14 $59.52 CITY OF LONG LAKE JAN HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 4D OH 1995/08/14 $79.37 CITY OP LONG LAKE PEB HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 003063 OH 1995/08/14 $58.23 CITY OP LONG LAKE MAR HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 4P OH 1995/08/14 $70.60 CITY OP LONG LAKE APR HARRINGTON L.S.0569-4344 4G OH 033720 $793.56* 1995/08/14 $94.71 COCA COLA VENDING POP FOR RESALE 0591-4802 04673033 OH 033721 $94.71* 1995/08/14 $266.11 COPY DUP PR INC TRANSPARENCY PAPER 0099-4210 02174106 OH 1995/08/14 $189.87 COPY DUP PR INC COPIER LEASE 0129-4210 2178360 OH 033722 $455.98* 1995/08/14 $29.30 CULLIGAN AUG,SEPT SERVICE 0590-4231 003097 OH 033723 $29.30* 1995/08/14 $312.90 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 03S5-4306 16634 OH 033724 $312.90* 1995/08/14 $500.00 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-CASCO P 0249-4390 003109 OH 1995/08/14 $1,710.00 DAHLKB TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-CASCO P 0290-4343 003109 OH 1995/08/14 $570.00 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-CASCO P 0249-4346 003109 OH 033725 $2,860.00* 1995/08/14 $243.22 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PLANN COM 0174-4306 76509 OH 1995/08/14 $375.05 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE ZONING FI 0174-4306 76261 OH 1995/08/14 $130.97 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE COUNCIL M 0039-4306 76509 OH 033726 $749.24* 1995/08/14 $5,422.92 E-Z RECYCLING JULY RECYCLE SERVICE 0295-4392 003078 OH 033727 $5,422.92* 1995/08/14 $220.21 EARL P ANDERSON ASSC SLIPPERY WHEN WET SI 0249-4232 142972 OH 033728 $220.21* 1995/08/14 $14.59 ENG REPRO SYSTEMS BLUEPRINTS 0099-4210 136710 OH 033729 $14.59* 1995/08/14 $20.00 htED RITE CONTROLS CYLINDER RENTAL 0549-4234 27811 OH 033730 $20.00* 1995/08/14 $21.29 PRATTALLONE'S ACE HARD COOLER FOR TRAINING 0129-4356 850700 OH 033731 $21.29* 1995/08/14 $79.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS WINDOWS SEMINAR 0039-4356 3077920 OH 033732 $79.00* 1995/08/14 $80.00 FROST, SHERRY R.COUNCIL MINUTES 0039-4306 003070 OH COTMCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 1995 00:29:35^^-1?? CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 033733 033735 1995/08/141995/08/141995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 199./08/14 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #$90.00$90.00 FROST$80.00 FROST $340.00* $15.49 G 6 K $2.60 G 6 K $49.68 G 6 K $15.49 G 6 K $67.25 G fc K $2.60 G 6 K $49.68 G fc K $2.60 G fc K $15.49 G fc K $69.02 G fc K $39.27 Q fc K $70.45 G fc K $2.60 G fc K $8.28 G fc K $39.27 G fc K $127.32 G fc K $577.09* SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PLAN COMM MINUTES PARK CO»l MINUTES COUNCIL MINUTES RATHBUN, QUAST STEFFENHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES RATHBUN, QUAST STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFEHAGEN RATHBUN, QUAST FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN, QUAST FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS 033736 1995/08/14 $156.29 $156.29* GEAR WEST SKI fc BIKE 033737 1995/08/14 $995.91 $995.91*GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCT 033738 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $10.88 $2.08 $131.16 $219.69 $363.81* GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO 033739 1995/08/14 $6.00 $6.00*GERRING'S CAR WASH 033740 1995/08/14 $117.15 $117.15*GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 033741 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $1,000.00 $102.60 $1,102.60* GOLF CAR MIDWEST GOLF CAR MIDWEST 033742 1995/08/14 $46.97 $46.97* GRAINGER-W W 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $301.00 $301.00 GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS CAR WASH TICKETS DRINKING CUPS AUG LEASE repair CARTS CUTOFF WHEEL 10" SEPT INSURANCE SEPT INSURANCE 0174-43060290-4306 0039-4306 0569 0590 0249 0549- 0249- 0590- 0249- 0590- 0569- 0099- 0099- 0249- 0590- 0569- 0099- 0129- -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 -4221 ■4221 ■4343 •4221 4221 4221 4343 4343 0129-4232 0629-4540 0290-4232 0099-4232 0249-4232 0569-4232 0129-4232 0590-4232 0590-4331 0590-4342 0249-4232 0590-4151 0249-4151 INVOICE003070 003070 003070 542903 542901 542902 546757 546756 546755 550554 550552 550555 550553 558167 554424 554423 554425 558166 558172 5608 46233 003095 003095 003095 003095 003098 003094 003082 951740 003090 3806623 3806623 PO NUM.Page 4MANUALOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH CH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH. OH COONCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMCXJNT 1995 00:29:36VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 0 INVOICE PO NUM.Page 5 * MANUAL Q33743 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $1,846.48 $170.74 $1,154.02 $3,773.24* GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC SEPT INSURANCE SEPT INSURANCE SEPT INSURANCE 0129-4151 0174-4151 9999-2030 3806623 3806623 3806623 OH OH OH 033744 1995/08/14 $209.75 $209.75* HALLIN/DOROTHY REIMB CLERK'S SEMINA 0039-4356 003073 OH 033745 1995/08/14 $150.17 $150.17* HAMEL BUILDING CENTER ENTRANCE SIGN 0651-4520 8906 OH 033746 1995/08/14 $50.00 $50.00* HENN CO TREASURER ENTRANCE PERMIT 0569-4344 22748 OH 1995/08/14 $304.19 HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM k BOARD - JUNE 0080-4358 494 OH 033747 1995/08/14 $90.06 $394.25* HENN CTY FIN DiV TRAFFIC TICKETS 0129-4322 1095001504 OH 1995/08/14 $92.27 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT JUNE BOOKING FEES 0080-4358 003062 OH 033748 1995/08/14 $887.15 $979.42* HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT MICROPHONES 0129-4232 003100 OH 033749 1995/08/14 $41.48 $41.48* INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERY 0290-4232 108006 OH 033750 1995/08/14 $2,860.64 $2,860.64* JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY REPAIR SQUAD Hi73 0129-4341 003069 OH 1995/08/14 $23.25 KUEHN, THOMAS JULY MILEAGE 0569-4381 003107 OH 1995/08/14 $6.65 KUEHN, THOMAS JULY MILEAGE 0174-4381 003107 OH 033751 1995/08/14 $43.15 $73.05* KUEHN, THOMAS JULY MILEAGE 0069-4381 003107 OH 033752 1995/08/14 $2,221.28 $2,221.28* LAWN DETAILERS INC.JULY SERVICES 0290-4343 1260 OH 033753 1995/08/14 $526.00 $526.00* LMCIT-3ERKLEY RISK INSP SQUAD #173,174 0129-4374 57736 OH 1995/08/14 $598.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 0549-4354 AR0195-2 OH 1995/08/14 $5,737.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 0099-4354 AR0195-2 OH 1995/08/14 $1,110.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 0569-4354 AR0195-2 OH 033754 1995/08/14 $5,065.00 $12,510.00* LOGIS - SUITE 3^0 SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 0129-4354 AR0195-2 OH 033755 1995/08/14 $15.00 $15.00* LONG LAKE POWER EQUIIM SHARPEN BLADES 0590-4342 1411 OH 033756 1995/08/14 $63.30 $63.30* LONG LK FORD TRACTOR MOWER CLEVIS 0249-4232 205100 OH COONCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 1995 00:29:36CHECK MO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVOICE PO NUM.Page 6 MANUAL1995/08/14 $412.54 MBDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0569-4151 195213102552 1995/08/14 $1,272.42 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 9001-1298 195213102552 1995/08/14 $675.33 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0069-4151 19:-il3102552 1995/08/14 $2,368.64 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 9999-2030 195213102552 1995/08/14 $262.79 MBDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0549-4151 195213102552 1995/08/14 $1,204.04 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0249-4151 195213102552 1995/08/14 $1,163.50 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0039-4151 195213102552 1995/08/14 $488.17 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0174-4151 195213102552 1995/08/14 $2,668.55 MEDICA CHOICE AUG HEALTH INS 0129-4151 195213102552 033757 $10,515.98* 1995/08/14 -$80.25 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 9673 3755 51400995 1995/08/14 -$302.58 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 9673-1151 51400995 1995/08/14 $2,986.58 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 056y-4396 514*^0995 1995/08/14 -$1,529.92 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 9673-1194 51400995 1995/08/14 -$919.58 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 9671-3756 514009. D 1995/08/14 $24,474.75 METRO WASTE MWCC-SEPT 0S69-4395 51400995 033758 $24,629.00* 1995/08/14 $380.00 MICRO AGE SYSTEM CONSULTING 0629-4540 93915 033759 $380.00* 1995/08/14 $70.77 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT PATCH 0249-4233 60270MD 1995/08/14 $332.50 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT PATCH 0249-4233 60329MB 1995/08/14 $498.01 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT PATCH 0249-4233 60427MB 1995/08/14 $190.47 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT PATCH 0249-4233 60376MB033780$1,091.75* 1995/08/14 $4.32 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0129-4210 273073 1995/08/14 $153.66 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4210 273873 1995/08/14 $346.02 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4210 274398 1995/08/14 $23.46 MIDWEST BSNS PROD HEAVY DUTY STAPLER 0129-4210 275031 1995/08/14 $42.54 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0129-4210 286035 1995/08/14 $38.56 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4210 286035 033781 $608.56* 1995/08/14 $27.26 MILLER, CHRIS JULY MILEAGE 0069-4381 003102 033762 $27.26* 1995/08/14 $36.22 MINN COMM PAGER SERVICE-AUGUST 0249-4221 70660008957 033763 $36.22* 1995/08/14 $22.50 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN 0249-4232 RIO795O070 1995/08/14 $13.50 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM MEDICAL OXYGEN 0129-4232 RI07950879 1995/08/14 $31.50 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN 0249-4220 RI06950855 1995/08/14 $96.50 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN 0249-4232 444437 033764 $164.00* 1995/08/14 $160.00 MINNESOTA GFOA MNGFOA AtJNUAL CONF-K 0069-4356 003087 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH CH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH CH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH CIL CHBCK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 1995 00:29:3€Page 7HBOC MO CHBCK DATE CHECK AMcxnrr VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT ff INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL1995/08/14 $160.00 MINNESOTA GPOA MNGFOA ANNUAL CONF-M 0069>4356 003088 OH033755$320.00* 1995/08/14 $2.00 MH DEPT OP REVENUE JULY SALES TAX 9001-3500 003093 OH 1995/08/14 $2,£44.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE JULY SALES TAX 9674-2222 003093 OH 1995/08/14 $308.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE JULY SALES TAX 9672-2222 003093 OH 1995/08/14 $7.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE JULY SALES TAX 9001-2222 003093 OH 1995/08/14 $6.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE JULY SALES TAX 9001-3527 003093 OH 033766 $2,967.00* 1995/08/14 $3,292.57 MN STATE TREASURER 2ND QTR SURCHARGE 9001-2222 003113 OH 033767 $3,292.57* 1995/08/14 $125.78 MTI DIST CO SHOE CLEXNER/BRUSH 0099-4232 149273 OH 1995/08/14 $11.01 MTI DIST CO TURF STAKES 0174-4232 147400 OH 03376S $136.79* 1995/08/14 $167.14 NANFITO,REECE SUMP PUMP RETROFIT 0569-4399 003065 OH 033769 $167.14* 1995/08/14 $89.00 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL SCHOENHOFF REGISTRAT 0129-4356 003085 OH 033770 $89.00* 1995/08/14 $222.33 NORTH STAR TURF INC.REPAIR MOWER 0590-4342 110100 OH 033771 $222.33* 1995/08/14 $187.71 NORTHLAND BUSINESS MINI CASSETTES 0099-4210 4030 OH 033772 $187.71* 1995/08/14 $929.40 NSP NSP CHARGES 0569-4324 003104 OH 1993/0B/14 $2,269.77 NSP NSP CHARGES 0549-4324 003104 OH 1995/08/14 $23.67 NSP NSP CHARGES 0290-4324 003104 OH 1995/08/14 $326.58 NSP NSP CHARGES 0249-4324 003104 OH 1995/06/14 $9.42 NSP NSP CHARGES 0175-4324 003104 OH 1995/08/1-:$672.77 NSP NSP CliARGES 0129-4324 003104 OH 1995/08/14 $1,298.76 NSP NSP CHARGES 0099-4324 003104 OH 1995/08/14 $213.12 NSP NSP CHARGES 0590-4324 003104 OH 033773 $5,743.49* 1995/08/14 $1,112.62 NSP STREET LIGHTING 0249-4325 003066 OH 033774 $1,112.62* 1995/08/14 $7.92 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.PEANUTS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 772468 OH 1995/08/14 $16.17 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.CHIPS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 772399 OH 1995/08/14 $16.48 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.CHIPS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 772546 OH 033775 $42.57* 1995/08/14 $39.15 QMAN/LYLB JULY MILEAGE REIMB 0174-4381 003101 OH 033776 $39.15* COCKICIL CHECK RBGISTBR Thu Augi 10 1995 00>29:36 Page 8CHBCK DATS CHECK AMCXJNT VENDOR DESCRIPTIC»I ACCOUNT I INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL1995/08/14 $246.38 $246.38* PATROL BIKE SYSTEMS BIKE GEAR 0129-4232 2570 OH 1995/08/14 $24.00 PERA INS SEP INSURANCE 0129-4152 003089 OH 1995/08/14 $108.00 $132.00* PBRA INS SEP INSURANCE 9999-2030 003089 OH 1995/08/14 '*27^.59 PIONEER '94 SUMMARY FIN REPO 0099-4322 226 OH 1995/08/14 $92.20 PIONEER '94 SUMMARY FIN. REP 0590-4322 226 OH 1995/08/14 $153.66 PIONEER '94 SUM4ARY FIN. REP 0569-4322 226 OH 1995/08/14 $92.20 PIONEER '94 SUMMARY FIN. REP 0549-4322 226 OH 1995/08/14 $79.26 PIONEER ORD N136 0099-4322 229 OH 1995/08/14 $70.32 PIONEER PW MAINT AD 0099-4322 98CD OH 1995/08/14 $46.88 $811.11* PIONEER AD-SALE OF SQUAD 0129-4322 99CD OH 1995/08/14 $250.00 POPHAM HATK k ASSOC G. NELSON-APRIL 0080-4303 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $1,100.00 POPHAM !!AIK k ASSOC APRIL LEGAL 0080-4301 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $600.08 POPHAM .HAIK k ASSOC APPLICATIONS-APRIL 0840-4306 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $170.04 POPHAM hAIK k ASSOC POLICE PERSONNEL-APR 0080-4303 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $468.76 POPHAM HMK k ASSOC APRIL LEGAL 0080-4303 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $3,798.93 $6,387.81* POPHAM HAIK R ASSOC MPRS LAWSUIT 0080-4303 2443062 OH 1995/08/14 $33.50 PRO TIRE It EXHAUST TIRE REPAIR #167 0129-4341 6051 OH 1995/08/14 $49.95 PRO TIRE It EXHAUST ALIGNMENT #173 0129-4341 5768 OK 1995/08/14 $45.60 PRO TIRE It EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #161 0129-4341 6092 OH 1995/08/14 $177.97 PRO TIRE It EXHAUST OIL CHANGE,BRAKES #1 0129-4341 6077 OH 1995/08/14 $22.00 PRO TIRE It EXHAUST REMOVE FOGLIGHTS 0129-4341 5999 OH 1995/08/14 $188.32 $517.34* PRO TIRE It EXHAUST OIL CHANGE, ALIGNMEN 0129-4341 5962 OH 1995/08/14 $193.83 $193.83* RADISSON ARROWWOOD CONFIRM #RE655506 0069-4356 003086 OH 1995/08/14 $59.40 REED VENDING CANDY FOR RESALE 0591-4802 15957 OH 1995/08/14 $67.80 REED VENDING CANDY FOR RESALE 0591-4802 15149 OH 1995/08/14 $44.40 $171.60* REED VENDING CANDY FOR RESALE 0591-4002 15136 OH 1995/08/14 $100.00 $100.00* REHBEIN FARMS GRASS SEED 0590-4231 5155 OH 1995/08/14 $7.97 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3762333 OH 1995/08/14 $3.65 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3763125 OH 1995/08/14 $80.28 RITZ CAMERA FILM, FILM PROCESSIN 0129-4210 3764040 OH 1995/08/14 $20.26 $112.16* RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3763417 OH 1995/08/14 / $2,123.96 ROLLINS OIL CO UNLEADED GASOLINE 9001-1260 49305 OH 1 N 033777 033778 033779 033780 033781 033782 033783 0337B4 033785 |Pff<rv.. ■*» .COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK DATE □Thu Aug 10 ECK AMOUNT 19§5 00:29:36vaiDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT • INVOICE PO NUM.Page 9 MANUALQ337IC 0337R7 0337lt 033719 033790 033791 033792 033793 033794 033795 033796 033797 033798 033799 033800 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 $2,123.96* $314.50 $314.50* $1,241.34 $126.50 $1,367.84* $43.35 $43.35* $285.00 $285.00* $67.85 $67.85* $3,155.00 $3,155.00* $75.00 $75.00* $45.50 $45.50* $66.46 $137.80 $45.59 $30.83 $14.80 $295.48* $400.00 $400.00* $590.95 $590.95* $65.50 $19.38 $84.88* $123.50 $123.50* $9.65 $9.65* RYAN FORD SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS SCHARBER k SOUS SCOTT BEACK SECOND CHANCE TRANSMISSION REPAIR SAFE BENEFITS-AUG AUG FEE WINDOW WASHER KIT GOLF BALLS COVER SHIRT SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVI 3RD QTR 1995 SPRING PARK CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS STRETCHERS STRBICHERS STRETCHERS STRETCHERS STRETCHERS SUBN RATE AUTHORITY SUBURBAN TIRE INC LOCK GRAND MASTERED TARGET PRACTICE SUPP STROBE POWER SUPPLY REPAIR TINT METER CABLE HOOKUP MAPLIGHT BULBS 2ND HALF 1995 SQUAD TIRES TELEPHONE SPECIALIST ACTIVATE PHONE JACK TELEPHONE SPECIALIST PHONE CORDS THORPE DIST CO TOLL CO BEER FOR RESALE WELDING ROOM STOCK 0129-4341 9999-2030 0299-4306 0249-4232 0591-4800 0129-4221 0100-4385 0129-4232 0099-4343 0129-4232 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4232 0039-4380 0129-4232 0629-4520 0099-4210 0591-4815 0249-4232 78519 15604 15604 123680 15412 0059275 003096 003110 43535 30311.1 29011.1 31558.1 30559.1 31406.1 003071 065190 40043 40124 62617 328753 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH t COmcIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Aug 10 199SCHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00t29:3«VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT «INVOICE PO NUN.Pag« 10 MANUAL f 033101 033103 033103 033804 03380S 033804 033807 033808 033809 033810 033811 033812 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 1995/08/14 / $433.72 $530.11 $963.63* TOWN k COUNTRY TOWN k COUNTRY AUGUST SERVICE AUGUST SERVICE $272.75 $827.46 $1,100.23* TRI STATE PUMP TRI STATE PUMP REPAIR GRINDER STATI REPAIR GRINDER STATI $366.76 $366.76* US WEST CELLULAR INC CELL PHONE-CHESWICK $373.40 $252.12 $55.29 $156.90 $55.66 $12.45 $29.04 $55.66 $53.76 $1,044.30* US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST US NEST US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST COMMUN COMMUNccnwm COMMUN COMMUN COMMUN COMMUN COIWUN CC»!MUN US US US US US US US US US WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES $263.00 $263.00* VECTOR ELECTRIC INC. REPAIR FORCE MAIN GR $49.81 $49.81* VILLAGE CHEVROLET EXHAUST 6708 $206.76 $95.85 $106.50 $409.11* WARNING LITES OF MN WARNING LITES OF MN WARNING LITES OF MN TEMP SIGN RENTAL BARRICADE RENTAL STUBBS BAY SIGN $71.31 $71.31* WATERPRO REPAIR WTR HYDRANT $2,761.84 $2,761.84* WAYZATA-CITY OF WTR PURCHASE 2ND QTR $128.25 $128.25* WEST SIDE REDI-MIX INC CATCH BASINS $10.00 $10.00* WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIR REPAIR TIRE 6712 $71,701.20 $870.17 $72,571.37* WM MUELLER fit SONS WM MUELLER fit SONS STREET MATERIALS STREET MATERIALS $8.63 WRIGHT HLNN ELECTRIC SECURITY LIGHT 0129-43430099-4343 0569-4344 0569-4344 0129-4321 0099 0129 0590 0590 0099 0549 0569 0549 0590 4320 4320 4320 4323 4320 4320 4320 4320 4320 0569-4344 0549-4341 0249-4331 0249-4331 0249-4232 0569-4344 0649*4359 0249-4233 0549-4341 0249-4233 0249-4233 0249-4325 003112003112 12583 12551 003099 003105 003105 003105 003105 003105 003105 003105 003105 003105 1786 94907 0074089 0073174 4512 706824 003061 46761 82911:A 003092 003091 003081 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COWMl CHIC* Thu»u9l„„„amoumt vendor1>»5/0«/14 5^5;«. *®KN ELBCTRIC$20i,l«3.io description security light account i0249-4325 INVOICE003080 PO NUM.P«g« U' MANUALOH ■ ■iwi XiCIL.•*! f A*<‘ I*JIT Thu A u 9 10 199S 00:29i4S Paga 1POHD • 001 miBRAL PUHDnm i 112 PMuc pumdP1MD • 114 IW/EQOl? 0/L PDPOID • IIB BLOG CAP 0/L FDPOND # 344 12 IMP BD D/S FDTOD • 423 MUM ST AID CO/FDFOMD • (72 NTR OPERATING FD FUND • (73 SVR OPERATING PD FUND • (74 ' /C OPERATING FD FUND i 999 PAYROLL CLEARING $144,7S(.4($312.90$1,441.41$150.17$2,981.25$9,733.97$(,848.11 $30,833.78 $6,233.05 $4,872.00 $208,163.10 information COUNCIL MEETING r»r’l NCILMEEnNB AUG 1 4 1955 OF ORONO OF :im^^DvisoR Leaders in Public Finance Since 1955 Published Quarterly I JULY 1995 The Bond Buyer Index (BBI) for 20 year ‘‘A** rMed bonds fell to S.7S% as of June 12, the lowest potne in I99S and down significantiy from the 7.06% last November 17. Tins is, of course, a nuxed bag for those wuh arbitrage rebate consiiferacions as the lower borrow mg rate restricts Investment earnings which can increase cash available for the project itself. For the most pan, however, lower boiTOwing rates are welcomed by taxpayers and municipal ofTicials alike. A proposal to remove the lax exemption on municipal bonds for Stale income lax in Minnesota did not make it through the IW5 Legislative Session, but it created a great deal of concern dunng its senous consideration "Tax reform" propi>sals at the federal level arc also creating great interest and concern in the investment community with their vary ing impacts on lax exemption. Changes which affect the tax advantage of municipal securities w ill CONTENTS BANS ........................................ I Hopkins AMM Award ................2 Scegar Swanson. Jr Ketircmeni Comments ..........2 Conferenccs/Conveniions ..........3 Summary' of Area Bond Sales . 4 Quotable Quotes "Oftentimes, politKaJ enuues with limited deN issuance cxpenence are tmk^n to the cleaners. Such entities are kss to pay, and they frequently take negotiated proposals at face value without chalknge Funds which could be used for necessary public purposes are diverted to unnecessary fees and expenses." Taken from /2A>.f issue of Government Finance Review also affect their pricing and demand. SLCONDARY MARKET DIS- CLOSl RE lb HERE Effective July 3, 1995. it becomes (I) unlaw ful fix a bn>kcr or dealer to purchase or sell municipal secuniics in connection with a primary offering of an issue of municipal securities with an aggregate pnncipal amount of at least SI .OOO.tXM), unless it has reasonably determined that the issuer Of an "obligated person" has undertaken in a wnilen agreement to provide certain information annually and upon the occurrence of material events; and (2) unlawful for a dealer to recommend the purchase or sale of municipal securities unless he/she has prixedurcs in niace that prt>vide rcavmable assurance that prompt n4>ii:c of the iKCurrence of a material event will he received promptly pursuant to the continuing disclosure undertaking. Ilicre are additional rules, procedures and exempUions which wc will he happy to discuss if you give us a call Most impHirtanlly. if you plan to borrow money tax exempt after July 3, 1995, you MUST comply with the new rtgulalions. We Will be happy to assist you in determining the level of continuing disclosure you are required to provide -BANS": CONVENTIONAL WISDOM vt. THE MARKET PLACE By: Tkivt Wmgner, BrookfieU Offke "Conventional Wisdom" has ling held that certain municipval obligaiHms couki or should only he sold by negotiaucHi w ith an underwriter, a process sometimes termed a "private sale" in contrast with a compictitivc "pniblic sak". Examples of such obligations that have at one lime or another been held to fall into this category include small and/ix non-rated general obiigatiims. waier/sewer/clecinc system revenue Nmds. spvecial assessment bonds and N>nd aniicipvation mHcs ("BANs"). B ANs were held to be the most unsuitable fur public sale Hie logic w'as that the w cak demand for these securities required longer lead lime by underwriters to first locate and then educate piotential buyers of such securities The term "story bonds" is son>ciimes applied to such secunties. Over the years the compeiiiivc marketplace has increasingly shown a demand for "story' bond" secunties with good financials issued by municipalities for essential pHiiposcs back^ by either an unlimited lax kvy or by demonstrated net revenues of a municipal cnlerpxise. We have seen small general obligation issues and revenue bonds attract 10 or more bids from commercial banks and underwriters outside of the Milwaukee market. Recently, however, we have witnessed a demand for BA.Ns which defies conventional wisdom. Examples of 4 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2950 Norwest Center • 90 South Seventh Street • Minneapolis, MN 55402-4100 • 612-339-8291 • FAX 612-339-0854 Corporate Woods. Suite 225 • 375 Bishops Wav • Brookfield. Wl 53005-6200 • (414) 785-1520 • FAX (414) 785-1810 Wiiconsin nwiici|ittlilks ire inchided in iftif quarter ’s and fant quarter ’s Advisor wlncii had a naad for comrnntcuom financing of waier and sewer pro^ecu in am o unts ranging from $885,000 to $3,000,000. Each received at least four htds from bidders located in Wisconsin, Michigan, nimois and. in two cases. New York, with winning net interest ranging from approxima^ly 4.8% lo S.9%. Winning tHidcrwriting. discooms ranged frm 0.1 to 0.69 points, all imidi kss than expected. What facton went into this transTonnacion of one of these BANs from ** story bonds'* to securities which both in>staie and oul> state investors could bid on? In each case there was an eiplanation of the long-term /immmcimg plan in the munivtpality's Onkial Statement whK'h allowed investors to make a reasoned judgemenf as to the ability of the municipality U' obtain the long-term financing which w as lo be used to pay off the BANs. In two cases a state or federal government agency had made a conditional commitment to provide the long term fmancing. There also appeared to be an increased willingness on the pait of bidders to take the tunc to read and understand these explanations, due perhaps to the relatively high demand tor munk'lpal bonds. While BANs are not for every municipality, their increased marketplace acceptance should be welcomed by ail as It adds to the optums open to municipalities as they seek lo resptmd to demands for infrastructure replaccnirnt and economic development. HOPKINS RECEIVES INNOVATIVE CITY AWARD TheCilv of Hopkins. Minnes4>ia. received the IWS innovative City Award from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMMi The award honors city initiatives that creat»* ely identify and correct a community issue. Hopkins IS receiving the honor for its efforts in developing a financing program that now paves the way for improvements to the Westbrooke condominium and patio home ncighburhuuds. Working with suae officiais, privMt consultants and WesdNooke a^ghbortiond resadenu, the City created the Stale ’s firsl liousing iaqvovemeat area*. Throu^ this program, the City is able lo help W'extbfooke property owners pey for private improvements to thetr neighbortnvids Westbrooke, located in south Hopkins, is compivsed of one patio home and four condominium neighborhoods There art a total of 1,296 housing units in the neighborhoods, representing about IS percent of the City’s housing stuck. Hhlers’ staff helped the City take the housing impn>vement area fnwi ccmcept to reality Rusty Fifleld helped the City staff evaluate options to address the detenoration of the housing stock in \he Westbrook neighborhoods This wcHt led to the improvcmciil area concept. This new ciMKepC required permission from the Legislature This legislatum, drafted by Gene Ranieri of Ihiblicorp (m»w of Ehlers and As.wKiates. Inc.), was designed to give the City the abilit) to finance improvements at Wesibnx>ke to be repaid thnvugh the collection of fees on the property owners ’ property taxes. Ehlers’ worked with the City to create a plan to establish the area and finarKe the improvements. The process required pn>f)cny owner petitions. Council actions on the areas, and fees subject to property owner veto. I’he success of the project reflects the collaborative approach used by the City and the humeow riers asvcK iation. The hcHising improvement area approach can be applied lo a wide range of housing needs Please call lo learn more about this tool and how to prepare for llic necessary special legislation SEEGAR SWANSON, JR. COMMENTS ON HIS RETIREMENT In 1^5. Seegar Swans4>n. Jr. joined the firm of Ehlers and AssrKiates. At that tiine the company had twx) Wisconsin accounts. Today tt has appn^ximaiely 2U) county, city, village, u>wn, sanitary distnet and scfkx'^1 disoxi clients in that Seegar itures this month "It’s been a team effort all the wav The company ha.s provided the supp^vtl, training and resources necessary for the conripany to be a true leader in the fmancial advisory field in the Badger State," said Seegar. Looking back, these m some of his thoughts: CJ Lucai gv'ierfufirnr (that mouik of many small commmnUies) is the real strength of the UmteJ States Government "of and for the people" is found in ytmr lu*metown. mn in Washingum. O Tops cm my list of great Ameru ans are the many lot ai elected officuih I have had the privilege of working with o\er the years Iah oI elected officials and staff work long and hard for the benefit of others. They seldom get the credit they desene. O It takes real cimrage for an elected official to do what is "right" rather than "■ opular". Many times this isn 't understood by the electorate. T(H} often elected officials are defeated in re election and sometimes even recalled. U I have had the privilege of working with many outstanding Un al leaders. It would bt impossible to list them all. But. oh. how wonderful you are. O There are also many great professKfnal persons / have asuH lilted with and worked beside during my career. They mcliuie 5ch(H)l supenntendi^nts, city and village administrators, business officials, municipal clerks and other local government administrators. There hasn */ been a "clock wale her" amimg them. O I have worked with outstanding bond lawyers from several firms. With O V r fSUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALESIOWA UmmOtf •omCarnttf Wmi Om Httmm CWD Ha^Ubmf NaiALitaiy iMMaFAb iMaSMrBaa lo»a 9Mi dl R c«m MINNESOTA N IM SlFM mt Ijtm »>A I HI) InMoai IJD f720(Shalu]fi«v) WaMBfB H«prm « H«m«> U* ISD V2t6llrTaiWyn( «M*«> I SI) MHn)f CoMy Cai^CAimtDA ISO MBSiSi Mriial OMM C O Of nmm oxs to mfimi CO mfum CO mny9i wmm w< tmtm GO M mfnm co m mrw CO M mmm go m «SQN«9 GO •« TmMM wmi scbMi «WHV95 IcAiial IM/lb'95 GO C •VI 1)95 GOA OVINVS Cm OvaV99 GO >A »MV 0VM5 WmIIi MOV95 OO lai 0MV99 WflwAi GO r«i OO M GO ( ovivn GO A 0VIS)9S GO <>VI5)95 GO 0VIV95 9Mt A U«a A r c QV22)9S G O C OSfimi SiM MOWS GO A MOWS G O A M))l/VS GO A •WWt GO A «WWS CO A OWT^ GO Ci Qtmm GOA 0V1D9S T«WA OVIWS OO A OAIWS GO A 0VIW5 GO A OVIWS GOA OVIWS GO A OVIWS GO A 0VIW5 TaMMi OWWS OO C OVr/fS GOT immm w« owws o o c omam Atmtm omm^ Mh %aktWmm GO OWI/M GO C'4 OVODM G O I U I u 01A1W5 AM k Noyai Srv«M» AaA 0VUW5 OO In Aaiit«Mir«m ofh OVtAT95 GO In Anktpam t'crto ot Umtmdrnn* 0VUW5 GO AnA OVI GO r«a AM ciimmK «« -f ilmai Oh IV95 O U In Anmiiiia ( tm at taMtonaM 0V)4rv5 (iO D mk AB u ^ 0V1W5 GO Tn larawM OVIVM C’Wa <Wa 1SI> •«n«(MKipiAi I HI) •iW’iftdwnaaat A|ifA Vitlrv F^nl IS U •!«» ilGmoHA Afvb Vaikv l^ni Ohium C» C) AAoal tayiHf kHaatea k 0V:iJ?r5 GO Mar \m>am lhmv*m tumrn OVn/V> GO Tw lafWBW AaA OlTiVM CO In---------- - OV7V95 TauMrGO lulvfnnaC ABt OV27/VS GO Iu Aannifana i aii «■! laA 0W)95 GO ScihkA AnlAa^ Ante 0VJ7/95 G O ScA miI BaMaa Anb TAB $ MlNNEsurA* Antf Aart > Ml w tiir‘ II.IW.OOO I.IMI uuo 42tJ (RX) UWi 1.5tt).UW i.oHi <>» ]).«9U IWU 4.UUJ UUU uuj l.ltHiU) 2,110 000 ) H4H <JUD (IS' .no 4 MXj .UUU 14 0 Hj |71(J14) WR/.(Kli> l< 225 OIRI I2.liu.0i4t tMA2t»5 I too 200) IW’ 2tW lW*t i44tt 1990-2010 l«9» line I997 2on 19*6-2014 I***-200* i««6 2on I9*V21»I4 J**6-2l>|0 14*’ *i«*- I**) l*«t 1*96 2UU>-2tM5 2Uia 2015 5 14% 5 2W 6 22% 4 75% 4 7*% 5 65% ♦ 6»% 4M>% 5 5 ’% 5 77% S7?% 3f2% 5 4l-% 544% 5 V>% ’ 54% 4M.>% 5 *2* 5 42% 6 11% 6 n% 6114% 6lJt% 6 04% 5 04% 6 11% ft 14% 6 14% 6 14% ft 14% ft U6% ft Jft* 6Uft% ftur% ft Oft* ft ll*% ft 06% 6 06% A* AA«.AA* A»AA*> AA« SU Nk Nk Nk MIG I Bn) N« Bnt A« AAA At (tin A NR Aa AA ixm immfm Banua (tnmty HmmmXam I S l> No III II D No ,nm K ISO P«e 465 <1 SBmlAto larta lomoa Fonfca I H l> No 1*7 4%r«« %i Paul Mfak4i Hagkafini M<atk»Ihi kayiaarf < k^IrPtenllRA M»* mnr »• *%* • GO Tn0N1W5 Ti OVWmi G o I4WV9S OO la^na IJWWS GO Ann miw* GO In In t)V|7%5 GO Tip I UirP%5 Ckw An6% mn%s CO % tMM7/*S GO U%P%S GO tn OVIWH mian 040 %%5 R«a 0WW5 GO 0W4)%5 GO kV27)*5 C O ovrns GO Mwns GO Mnms G o 4%%inS GO MnWS GO MnWS GU OVIWH GO 0V4V4A (iO MklWH Tna 05AJ1245 (, () 0V0A95 C> n WnH f- Tliir (M/UW5 GO Tn 45A)«^1 GO C'lp oviom OO ovtons GO oviom GO win** GO Mr||)%5 GO 0Vll>%5 tJO 4%II<%H GO 0V152*5 GO Tn (IV|S)*5 GO I 0%|V%5 GO ll <JVI\%5 GO % l)V)V*5 iHi T iSnn A VA i.4 AaMAat Anto < AB t DViH/95 TauMr GO Tn •7V1W5 GO laptmwnBo 0VIV*5 TnmtCiO In Ini ()%IW5 GO Ian AM load I UVIW5 GO (paaNans ovians GO % 0S)1W5 t O % ovin%5 <io i ovtws GOA oanm go a OS/7W5 G o « OV2i%5 CO It OV22/%5 »•<) ».»V.*i/*5 GO OV22/95 GO i7H'22/*5 GO (N%f (‘awa Rrvcow AnA 0V2 V*5 PiNb Pnm* kr*«an AnA CrV2 W5 («0 Inp I iiaBi Rrfuakog AnA OV.'WS (lO -‘kn4 ftrfiainn BnaA OV2VN5 GO •-!----------ri - IT i_L OWl'45 (.o la OWINft Gil 0WV%5 fio 0WA%A GO fJ6Art.%A (. I •)A5I5A)A I f 11 '4Vin*5 IA**14 »l6An%5 (i<) GU (I6U5AI5 GO G O I %air*aa A>«aur BnA Ann 2.J15 0M 1946 201*’ 64*6i)*% CtBT -95.«W 1946 104*5 16%6i)»% A HtO.flM 194^ 2014 5 72%407% nr 346 044 1446 JMI S )«%6<T% Nk 413 am 1447 2611 •66%4 03% NR 64b ilJO 19T* 2014 5 61%601% 501 1 (noaob 1946 4 54%601% NR 2 450 000 1997 2014 5 64%6 01% MMA 1 |74 (m> 19*7 2006 5 11%6 01% A 1.155 000 1999 2004 5 52%6 01% Mil A « lAMXX) l«*7 2016 565% 601% CX«' 1 MU UU.) 1*97 201* 5 79% 6 01% AA* i.HODtWU !*4% lU 10 5 54% 5 *6% AaAA 6.5aD.i«IO 1*96 2010 5 14% 5*6%AaAA U*5.UUi !«95 2014 5 41% 5 *6% NB «00.an» i«*5 1014 5 41% 5*6% NR 725 000 19*4 2015 5)0% 6 06% ini 740.000 1*9 7 2011 5 71% 4 06% Bn 2B55 ODD 1497 2017 5«|% ft 06% Bn 2.403.000 1997 2046 5 26% 6 06% IT» 425 UUII 1*96 2040 4 55% 4 06% Bnl 313.000 1996 2040 4*4% ft i»% Bnl 440.tBtl 1*94 5 *2% 6 06% fe* 155 (iiJ 1*97 6 06% A *45 000 1996 2012 5 15% 6 |0% NR 5.04U.UU0 1*96 2010 6 25% 6 10% A(B(' 2 IN) (iiO 1*962007 611% 6 |0% AlBI 11.043.000 19*61015 549% 6 10% An AAA 2.173.00b 1*96 J0I6 5 45% * 10% A 470.000 1*94 2004 5||% 6 10% A 10.750.000 I*97 1004 4 47% 6 10% Al 2.163.000 1*47 JOll 5 19% 4 IO% A! 5.1*3 000 2006 2017 5 6 iO% Aft 4.273.000 1*462017 5 46% 6 10% MBU 20.000.400 1*06 2015 5 49% 4 I U% An AAA 3.000.000 1997 2WN 4 f«% 3 *6% A 795.000 |9r*-200» 3 19% 5 *6% Bnl 4.430.000 19*7 2011 3 40% 3*6% l UT 2.150.000 1997 .oil 5 if.% 5*6% C'lJIC 2.130.000 IV94 3 36% 3 *6% A 1.415.000 1*94 2«>»4 7 54% 5*6%ltJR: 1.910.000 1996 20U6 5 21% 3 *6% NR 1.645.000 1997 2U0 7 m% S 96% AMRAT 72«.i«U I996 2i»5 4 00% 5 *6% NR 10.000 <U0 1995 1999 4 42% 5 *6% An AAA •.24Q.UUU 1*96 2015 *41% 5 p% As 7 9U0.iAi) )4«4 2VI6 4 Ni% 3 *6% Aft 400 000 1497 2001 4 41% 5 96% NR 45U GU3 1*97 2010 3 26% 4 *»% NR 5|3.oac IP7 iOll 5 6ft% 5*6% NR 633 OUU 1*96 2010 4 * 7^ 4 92% N| 645.000 1996 3 92% NR lai OiRI 1*96 2tRM .-4 3 92% NR 26.430.000 1*94 2016 M>5 5 *2% MUA V»*0.i.i6.i 1*9 7 2006 4*65 4 *26 A 670.000 1*9* 2014 5 'ft NR I5U.0UI' I99620IU 6 09% 7 • 4fll V2 73.00IJ 194* 4 74% 14 I.645.UUU 1*94 2004 5 |)% 5*2% Ai 410.000 1*97 2010 3 54* 3 92% NR 6 'I mil 1994 2005 5 20% 5 4V%Rn M4.00O 1*94 2011 5 4;* 5|7% R m *13 OUO 1*94 2011 3 15% 5 »9% Al I.IHO.rai l««7 2016 5 4’% 4 79% Al I.Mu .UA ***’< ' 4 65% 3 79% AMR AC 6.5’5,«R» 19*4 2012 3 P9 5 79% MBlA I.325.0U0 1*94 2U02 4 619 5 79% NR 9)4,(«<j 1991 .fjli7 4I29 5 79% A 1.4*0.000 1*97 ^J|6 4 Hi% 5 79% A ft'Tx^iO 1997 2ti|l 5 4|% 5 79% NR 2.I60.01IU 1*97 2011 4 vl9% 5 7*% A i JT^ooOuO aoao G 9¥9tm ao k mmm ao » MTMf OO O «ri»V9 OO tk m/l3f99 TmM iB«0 UOn^IRCUCMr) QOPwftHi^ ISO M»«9CiiNi« MMaMnnUMPlMi OOMN UB N» tSIflMtMt^ UO Ito uo mmcimmi Cmm\ C mb I IQO U atriVM OO Vto tHii mijm ao ^fmmm ao W^mmm mflV99 oo •«* •viyw ao mum ao wmm CO mt\3m oo mflM99 oo O* mmm ao a^mm a wmm i miW3 ao Warn hm mnm Fsammscma^cm-Ai mmm oo T« ^mamm BmO tVIM T^Mi kMrf N m^ Bt mnam ao amm aatm^ Om MflfOf oo ta* aattam oo im iw«Mi twi tvt«vs oo Bmat mi\am r amatt^ mnmai oo mram o o 0MV9^ OO aanvai oo oo aamm co t»QM5 oo MM oo «riM oo tali atmm ao um mmm oo lap mmm oo stn mmm oo tm mmm oo mm ISO m m0L ISO m mm a amjma ifw^sms UtfJOi IMMOIt 1, mijom itt^son SJfOLflM l«Vt JMT \jm.am ina ma \ m.om \wr m2 C4SS.0M \wf mn ammo imsmi um \ma-mm X.MI.aM IfVT 91S ijiiMm IW7 ms 20.740.000 1007 Ml ^ I4.4I0.M MOO «2I \.mjmo im-ms a.SSDJW loot J0I7 2.400.000 MIS 2013 2. J40.000 2012 2011 •70.000 ton mi I 240.000 ion 4 403 <«» ion 2000 40S.0M 1000-2011 Hojoo looo^mo 40S OOO ion MM SOTO SOSO 4 07%sot« 1M s too 4 7»4| 5 I4« 4 42^ 1 JO* 500* 3 12* 5SO* 4.01* SS2* 400* 472* 477* S24* soo* S40* 0I»* 702* 4 74* S04* 3 20* 3 30* 4tS* 70S* 3 20* 307* 370* SO* or* 320* 304* 3J7* • r% 3 37* 4 35* 4t2* 3 SO* 320* 320* 370* Sa3 TO* cxac3 70* Al 3 70* »ai 3 70* MMA 3 -m WBCOra^•l CM iMCDA aac AJ Ai Aa m MMA 3 70* 3 73* 3 73* 373* 373* 5 74% 373* Ml 3 73* Ml 3-*3* 3 73* m 573* Ml 3 73* A 3 73* iM 373* Ml 3 73* 3 73* 3 73* 304* 300* 300* 300* 300* 300* sat* 310* 310* 3t6* 310* 300* 312* 3 0* 3t2* am 3A2* Ml 3t2* A 3 0* A 3S2* Ml 312* Ml AOAA Ml Al A cur cm: A/AA A/AA A m MMA MILA Aa^AAA A m AAA ROC MBtA A* OO OOOMIM O O mmm oo mrmm oo mti*t oo Ml OSr'VOS oo OSriM OO 0VI0M3 0.0 C OiriM OO OSriM ao oviom o o o OVt7M3 o o t»lM oo C mmm oo oamm oo oamm g o mnsm atm oymm oo mmm OWIM oo 1 (MI2M3 GO 0*1 2M3 r«H 0*1*33 C 0*1*31 Ta« 0*1*31 GO Q*iM ao 0*1*31 OO Cl 0*1fMl OO C 0*1*31 oo G 0*1*31 ammrnm 0*13131 S«*i* a*iM oo c« OiOM oo i« 0*2*31 GO M I fin I 0*1*31 uo c 0*2*31 OO 0*2*31 oo 0*2*31 OO C 0*21/31 0*22/33 a*2tM3 liO 0*23M3 ** M/27/31 OO laOaMlMMmB3"B 3 4(30.030 I3n 2014 3 33%142% Aa 3*27/31 OO laMl la«*1.340.000 I33t 2014 4 73%542% Aa «4orni DAKOTA •70.000 1031 2004 4S2%5 42% A i.m.ooD ion 2014 5 11%142% MMa Mm OVTOm GO M ■mi aOM BMM'04/2*31 OcM oatoom o o cb *mi 11■3.403.000 133* 2003 344%3 04% Aa Ombmiv K 400.000 1330.2004 5 44%404% Aa iMMtll 0*2SA1 G O lOpivay 0 AllBMllMlI 1A23.000 1334-2003 141%4 00% Al tammaamm VMaAlMSMaaiDMrfcl •*l*33 OO 3VIV33 Wmm ovum Uwm ovum a 0*2*33 GU 0*2*33 GO 0*2*31 GO C 0*0V31 GO * 000*31 OO 0*03/31 Wma oomm GO 0*l*3.> Waas 0*ilM3 GO 0*iM GO 0*1*33 OO 0*1*33 OU 04/1*33 WarUalMT 0*2*33 OO 0*2*31 GO C 0*2*31 OO (mnsm oo 05A)\m a,mm Si lAjr* Han§mt Oat •AODMO I33A2004 3 13% 4 Itt Aaa I JOD.OOO 1333 3 34% 4 ll% HO 3300.000 1333^2003 3 14% 403% A* 3030.000 2001 2013 3 31% 4 03% NO IJS0.0M 1333-2004 3 13% 3 03% Al IJIO.000 13302014 3 t2% 3 03% A 2.775.000 1333-2013 312% 3 03% MllA 4.000. 000 1330 2014 3 tS% 407% R« 1.000. 000 ion 2004 3 14% 407% A IJOO.UOO ion 2013 4 00% 407% MIU l.m.000 1334-20113 3 21% on% A tANi 3.000.000 1334 411% 40)% MB l»oanO 1335 1333 4 40% 403% A4l 1.7413.000 1334-2003 3 04% 401% A 11.000.000 133*2003 Aft% A0l% Aa 2^23.000 134* 2003 4 3t% 401% Aa 1500.000 1344-2014 5 72% 4 01% RJlL 11.710.000 1344-2005 5 00% 401% A4B 1415.000 1337 2014 5 4«% 5 34% KJL I 555.000 ion 2004 5 25% 5 34% A 14.300.000 1337 2004 5 04% 5 34% Aa 300.000 1337 2014 4 47% 4 06% KJI MT« M T« Ka«afM>N» 1 CiraORaOi f3aiNa3» CiraaO Kate Drry • late 3SG laiHi^ AaiMOi farfc Icftna UMttki MK-TM DAkUl .% kfbJhaiifc oatoim Lam 0*15231 LmO 0*1*31 Sa* 0VI7/31 Ij* Q*Z2M1 GO OIMIMI t ap 0M>*35 RaR 0*0*31 0*1 V35 0*13/31 Sa 0*1*31 « 0*l*r35 GO Tm • » ■OLary naRapaa 0*27/31 nmMa 0*27/33 L mM 0*1*31 « O Bmmi Pi«I3a«a*5*13B»rnmarm-4aar biAra 0«Ma|I 310.000I3M 2014 441%603% Ml2..«40.006 J34? 2014 5 14%6 10%AMKAC1.100.0001333 2W1 5 01%6 10%AAMAC1.510.00013301330 440%3 10% Aa •5C.0HI 134020055 01%3 13%Ml 5.r/5 OKI 1330 20M 5 15%3 10%Aa 1 4W.000i33omo 144%3 10% ixar 2.1UI<)U0 1334 2005 4 35%5 43% A 5.050.0001333 2011 5 11%3 33%/5*AA 4.33U.U001330 2010 3 12%533%Aa/AA i.Sau.ouO 1431 20U4 430%5 33%A i.rM.aM 13302003 4i3«5 33% AI//SA 4.310 000 133020105 140 5 33% AMM* 1. mo 1331 2007 1 12%^33% Ml 15.liS.0M 1330 2010 12 ' 33%MMA A4M0M1337 MIO 124%5 32% CXJT' it. 300.000 1330Mil 544%5 31% R«r 101.000I3M 2001 4 33%532% Ml 540.000 2000 344%532%IM U'^ODO 1340 20M 4M%1 70%A 1 3M.oao 1333 417%5 70%Ml 4.031.0001330 iOUl 5 52%5 73%RJC 140,0001330 2004 434%5 71%A 2OK0M 1330 20M 430%1 71%A 6.0M4M 2000-M15 403%1 75%Ml 300.0M I3M MI4 4 10%175%Ml 4.I71.0M133020145 3.5%5 71%RJT 7 51.00013302001 443%3M%Al M^OOU 13301005 4 71%143%Al 100 OM 1337 2003 5 44%143%m 17.323 OM 1330 2015 124%5M%Am I.330.0M 1337 2016 in%543%HO 400 OM 1330 20D1 5 27%143%Ml 5A3U.OM 1337 20U4 4 44%143%A« 5.251 OM JOO* 2014 574%143%MMA 340.000 ion 2003 443%1M%NR 2.0)1.000 1330 2014 5 25%146%Aal 1.225 000 1330 20M 4 65%144%/U1 1.4710001333 2003 434%144%AA* 27.SJU.aUi 1330 MIO 4 33%544%Aat/AA* HQ.0M.0Cn I3M )43%144%AAA 1.010.000 1334-20113 12%SM%NR roau.ouD 13302003 443%5 42%Aa Z.JM0aO 1333 447%142%NR 41000013302001 515%404%NR 1.721.00013302007 5 17%403%AI//U 1 114L0M 13302001 443%400%Ay A* 1.005.000 1330 2or 5 23%401%NR 5.345.000 1331 2«>IU 521%134%Am )M.00i 1330 2001 430%134%Am 740.000 1330 2002 4 37%404%NR 4MM0 1330 2005 124%4 04%Ml 320.000 1330 2000 443%134%Ml 1.040.0110 13302005 5 21%144%Raal 245 000 13302010140%134%NR 700.000 I33OMI0 144%5 32%NR 1 TfUUUU 13302011561%145%NR 505.000 1330 2002 4 54%1 73%NR 325.000 133020104 6)%5 73%Ml 2.2^ «»I33OMI0 5 15%171%MRU IJ40 000 1330-MIS 163% 144%Al 2.100.000 1337 2013 3 64%1M%Al 740.000 1330 2015 5 54%144%Aa 1.410.000 1330 2015 530%142%RmI U>54MJ 1330 2005 440%142%Raa 1.500.000 1330 2003 3 n%40)%Om ■i help. memy seemungh impossible financings have been accomplished That is creative fmatumg and together nr have accomplished our share. O There are many other professional persons to thank. This im luJes tocai attorneys, engineers^ architect.,, accountants and planners. Withtna them there would be no projects and no financings. What an effort they make to get things done! a Special thoughts go to P,d>erT Ehlers. Sr. who hired me fo^ a jtyb tlmt paid enough so i could afford suits'*. He also taught me most of what ! know ah<mt local government finance . . . and work ethic . . . and how to watch my traiel expenses. Q At Ehlers ! ha\r always worked with great people. The clients huTw me so / take most of the credit, hut mu4 h of the work gets done by our fine supiwrt staff. O \khen the empUnees purchased the company from Bob Ehlers. Sr. in 19^5. / had the lu^ru^r of serv ing as Chairman of the Board. / had a w onderful board to work with. Q Uke all successful people. / have enjoyed strong family sup Thanks Tat. Cd M\ namesake first horn asked as a jumor high student. "M fuii should I tell ms frieruis when ihev ask what kind of work you do '" " fell them when they decide to horroH a million Im. k.s to call me. " was ms answer. iJ When I first started work at Thiers Mr Robert Thler\ rsplained that the msnicipal bond indtestry $aw few changes. Local govemrwus had been borrow ing money by issuing bonds for two hundred years, ami most things were done traditumally. a With the IRS and SEC. my. how things have changed Who would base thought that the Federal Reserse Bunk would conirtd the i^rld s economy by raising and lowering interest rates like a yv-yv. O When I first started with Ehlers. most of my work was with school districts. Declining enrollment gave »*ay to the Clean Water Act. and put us in the business of selling sewer bonds. Sow we are working with schtwls again. O When meeting a traveling salesman, I often challenged him with. 7 bet my product is harder to sell than yours. It wsm me a few dinners and Bob thought / w as doing a good Job watching mv travel expenses. ^ The company was a pioneer in Minnesota III so / had the drop on my Miscimsin TIE competitors. We did about 70 districts in 1979 and I9S0 alone. .A ssi.sted by m\ w ije and daughter. / wrote custom software programs that enabled us to meet all the deadlines with lOO<\ of the districts receiving W/)()R approval Li It IS mv conviction that a principal reason ^k isconsin w as spared from the 90s recession w as that the many forward looking communities' TIE pif>gram.s were working uf that time. Li Well, It 's been fun Thanks to the forward planning of the Ehlers team, ^isc, msin is now well served hv □ Sieve Apfelbacker, DmvidAndertou, Mike HmtriguH, David Wagner. Kent Johnson and Sean !.entz And they have a great supp,m staff of experiemed professtonals Icoukki t have done sm h a gosdjob for so Itmg without vnmr sup/H>rt Thanks Seegar Swan son CONGRATULATIONS Gene Ranieii was awarded NAHkO’s Housing and Conununuy Dcvciopmcni Achtevemrnf Award at ihc May meeting at Atrowwuod m Alexandria. MN The award is given for significant contnbuiions in the areas of housing and community development in the State of Minnrsoui. CONFERENCES/CONVEN TIONS We hwvk forward to seeing you at the upcoming conferences including the fol lowing: • Minnesou Association of Small Cities (MAOSC) • Minnesota County Auditor/Trrasurer's Conference • Minnesota National Asstxrialion Housing and Redevelopment Officials (MN NAHRO) ‘ Minnesota Government Finance Officers Assoc iation (MGFOA) » Minnestita Assivialion of School Administrators (MASA) ' League of Iowa Municipalities (LIM). x' / Carolyn Drude Board Chairman ¥’ Trends in Bond Buyers Index 1990 to Present 8.00% . 50% TOO* j- K 6.50%I O d 6 00% «a « > 5.50% *. ft t#* ■’i^ .....I ^ ■ •^ I, , i />’■.-: ,i -.*•, D Current! 500%L 4.50% h P «4t. ■•Til nffir" ' - ji-, r . 670%f 620% 5.70% ftilflimW: I k :W. „ «<«• .■ : " 4 00% ^ # • .‘ - hLjA 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 L___ < I. Ehlers and Associates 3300 LOXCVIEW CIRCUS L03TG lAKE, MTVNESOT.% 53330 i -m' /?f ^ iviv • • ,tt4U2 m au^C(J 4-uj<Ac^^u^^cM^(C^ _ '-{J ljL JiauU. ,UU(U^ ^UcJ. /u^£c4^ ^u4jlj^(:^ uu^-ii-£M-^ {l-ic^ cC^^-cc-^ A-'(fLd AJ>^ t.^ i<? fc^ /jU^K^ Jici^t^P{LjLti^ • _ ^(m '-t'U-t^ /eAjsuec/! 2? ’ Ctoi /ceA^. , ^ '~C(i£ '^uji,aJ~~ ^r"TP^::^-^ J ^^Metropolitan Council Working Jor the Region. Planning for the Future AUG 9 ^ August 4, 1995 TO: Metropolitan Area Gtj* Administrators for your information is a copy of a letter sent to iocal officials in your community. You win note that there has been a change in the starting times for the regional briefing on the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. All of the briefing sessions, scheduled between August 14-23, will begin at 7 p.m. This change to a later hour is to allow for greater participation by local oflicials Staff and local officials are encouraged to attend the briefing session that is most convenient. The program will be the same at all four sessions. £ncl(»ure 230 Eaat Fifth street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612)291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TOD/TTV 291-0904 Metro Info line 229-3780 An Equal Opportuntnj EmpUxjer ctropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future August 4,1995 Ed CaUabai Mayor CityofOrano 2545 N Shore Dti\e Crystal Bay. MN 55323^164 Dear Mayor Callahan: The Metropolitan Livid>le Communities Act of 1995 laid the basis for a ne>»' partnership bet>^ een the Metropolitan Council and the communities uliich make up our region. This partnership li aimed at cleaning ep polluted lands, increasing the supply of affordable and Ufec>cle housing where new job growth is highest, and providing incentives to test mo^Is of more compact, transitoriented development and re-development Adiieving th»e regional goals depends much on how well all of us can communicate as we implement each portion the law. To ensure maximum communication, we have three steps in mind: first, to hold regional briefings for local govemmoit officials and staff. Dates and times are listed below; August 16 - Shoeview City Hall, 7 p.m. August 17 - Dakota County Western Ser\ ice Center, Apple Valley, 7 p m. August 22 - Metropolitan Council Chambers, St Paul, 7 p m. August 23 - Minnetonka City Hall, 7 p m. September • Staff Forums (dates to be annouiKed) Second, we are forming staff teams within the Council to meet with each community or clusters of communities to develop mutually agreeable housing goals. Throtigh a separate process, we are designing an application and scoring system to distribute funds for polluted site clean-ups. Third, we will continue to work with representative organizations which have a strong interest in this law. We have already consulted the Association of McU'opolitan Murucipolities (AMM) about housing goals £iiiHgling«t Many mavors and council members were active through the AMM in getting this legislation and we are committed to continuing this cooperative relationship. We ore also consulting with as many legislators as possible as we move through these implementation steps. Council responsibilities in this new partnership will be carried out principally by Craig Rapp, Director of the Community Development Division, whom many of you know as a former city manager in this region, most recently at Brooklyn Park. I hope you will feel welcome to contact him, or Jim Solent, the Regiona' Administrator, with any suggestion you have Sincerely, Cim Johnson Chairman 230 East FUth Sueet St. Paul. .Minnesota 55101-1634 (6121 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 In Emuit Onnnrrxjutrj Fmni/itjer TDD/TTY 291 -0904 .Metxo Info Line 229-3780 cm' OF ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 7, 1995 7:15 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ATTENDANCE AGENDA 1 . Introduction of Newly Appointed Park Commission Member Andrew J. McDermott III. 2. Approval of Minutes of July 13. 1995. 3. Presentation by Antoine Park Neighborhood AsstKiation. 4. Consideration of Land or Money to be Donated to Park Dedication Fund in Connection with the Following Subdivisions; . vt a. #2031 Kelley. 2340 Fox Street - Recommend Trail Easement along the North Side of Fox Street. u xt u c-1 b. #2029 Smith. 2580 Fox Street - Recommend T'-ail Easement along the North Side of Fox Street. c. #2051 Hilbelink. 2760 Watenown Road d. #2043 Buhrer. 2620 Fox Street e. #2047 Lakeview Golf. 405 North Arm Drive f. #2053 Dennis L. Plaiteter, 809 North Brown Road (Citv staff to provide dollar amount of the park dedication fee involved it we accept cash and how much this will be reduced if we accept a 12 foot trail easement along the nonh side of Fox Street in lieu of cash.) Report by City Staff on Cost of 1995 Improvements to Old Cry stal Bay Road Bike Trail (portion to be paid out of park dedication fees and portion to be paid out of DNR grant). Completion of Planning lor Award of Friends of die Park Award at September 5th Meeting. 7. Update on Other Matters; a. Passive Park on Dickey Propeny (Ilse/McMillan). b. Open Space Planning Process (Moorse. Gerhardson). c. Hiehwood Nature Trail (Gerhardson). d. Lowry Nature Prcser%e (Gerhardson). e. North Brown Road Segment of Bike/Uike Trail (Gerhardson). f. Aerial Maps (White). 8. Planning for Fall/Winter Park Program. 5. 6. 9.Other Business adjournment ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MLNt'TES FOR JL'LY 13,1995 DRAFT ATTENDANCE The Park Commission met on the above date vvith the fonoT^ing members present. Chair Richard nim, Vice-Chair Lili McMiUan, Commissioners Roben Howeiis. Sus^ V\ ilson, and James White. Sherokec Use was absent. Representmg Staff w ere Public W orks Director John Gerhardson and Recorder Sherry Frost. Chair Him called the meeting to order at 7; 22 p.m. (#1) APPROV.AL of \nNUTES OF APRIL 4, 1995, MAY 1.1995, AND JUNE 5, 1995 Wilson moved. White seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Park Commission Meeting of April 4, 1995 Ayes 5, Nays 0. The miimies of the .Mav 1, 1995 meeting were amended as foilows: Page 2. 1st paragraph - -instalUtton wn!l be performed by City employees" was removed Page 4 under Item s7, last paragraph, was amended to read, "Hennepin Parks has the first nght ol retusal on the Veterans Camp propenv " Flint moved. McMiUan seconded, to approve the .Mmutes of the Park Commission hieeting ofMay I. 19^5 as amended Ayes 5, Nays 0. White moved. Howells seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Park Commission Meeting of June 5. 1995. Ayes 5, Nays 0 (H2) PL.4NNLNG FOR AWARD OF FRIENDS OF THE PARK AWARD TO GIRL SCOUT TROOPS AND OBA Flint informed the Commission members that the Council has approved the awards. It was decided to present the awards prior to the Park Commission meeting on Tuesday. September The presentation will be held outside the Council chambers at 7.00 p.m The reguiar rneeting will follow at 7 30 p m Wilson wUI inform the girl scout troops of the scheduled time Use will be in charge of refreshments McMillan will make the presentation of the award ceni6cates. which will be completed by White and Gerhardson. A press release with photograph will be given to the media by McMillan. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLXY 13, 1 995 AFT Gerhardson informed the Commission of the pending sale of the land along Old Crv’stal Bay Road north of Watertown Road, w hich is part of the tnul system, The property' will change ownership in August. The new owner is willing to gram the an easement to build the trail on the property in remm for a credit against future Park Dedication tees. The current owner had not wanted the trail to be a stumbling block ter any forthcori^g sale of the property. Gerhardson reported that because of the pending s^e, the DNH has granted a 30-day extension from the onmnal deadUne of August 30 tor the trail to be built. The grant from the DNR has been appro\-ed and will result in matching t^ds up to a certain dollar amount The other 501 o of the funds will come from Park Dedicatum money. The gram tlinding covers the portion of the trail w hich is contiguous This wi include for 1995 the completion of the trail from the Dickey pioperty south to Luce Line and north from the Dickey property across Watertown Road to the top ot the hill Curb and laitter will be installed south of the Dickey property to the Luce Line becauM the property owners there were not willing to grant an easement The DNR grant will not cover the cost of curb and gutter but will cover 50® i of the trail cost in this area There will be a 4’ grass area provided between the trail and the curb Gerhardson will present the Commission with exact dollar costs of the trail segments at the ne.xt meeting including the portion to be paid by the D.NR gram. DNR gram for this year is about $29,000 ^^nth a possible $50,000 grant money available in 1996 The DNR matching fund gram money is geared towards projeas exactly like this one for transit/trails only. McMillan asked if Hennepin County is participating in the trail Due to time constraints in updating the contract with the City, and a concern over the Hwy 12 cloverleat design near Baker Park, Hennepin County has withheld their participation at this time White said the County does have the funds set aside and -.vlh v-ive this money for the trail segment to Baker Park Flint commented that this has been very frustrating; WTien the City is ready, Hennepin Parks is not; a year ago when Heimepin Park was ready, the City was not. We are fortunate that the delay has not raised the cost ot the trail. Gerhardson said that the 1995 work will be completed by September of this year Flint reported that Gerhardson was able to negotiate costs with the contractor obtaining the same cost per yard for the shorter trail seamem as it would have cost for the longer segment Normally a shorter lament is more costly, but not this time because the contractor was already in the area doing the Hwy 12 improvement project Wilson asked whether the Park Commission had formally approved the binding from the Park Dedication money The approval was noted in the .April meeting minutes, page 12. last paragraph ot the Old Crystal Bay Road Trail item. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMNUSSION Mht flNG HELD ON JLJLY 13, 1995 |[^|^ (#3 - Old Cn-sul Bay Bike Trail Status Report - Continued) McMiDan asked that the Park Commission be provided the final dollar amounts for the 1995 trail section at the August meeting, detailing the DNR and City costs. Gerhardson said he would also provide the plans for the development of the easements There will not be curb and gutter north of the Dickey property because of the easement granted. iMcMillan and Flint discussed the future trail segment and configuration to the school and along CoRd 6. Flint suggested that the school board, as part of its bonding for the new elementaiy school, could assist in the cost of the trail on the school property, both the north-south portion along Old Crystal Bay Road and an cast-west portion to connect with the trail which is planned along the south side of CoRd 6 east of Old Crystal Bay Road. (#4) CONSIDERATION OF LAND OR .MONEY TO BE DONATED TO PARK DEDICATION FUND IN CONNECTION WITH THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: A. #2031 KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET - RECOMMEND TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF FOX STREET A decision for a trail easement or Park Dedication fund monev' will be decided at the August meeting along with item 4b as these properties would both involve a possible future trail segment along Fox Street. B. #2029 SMITH, 2580 FOX STREET - RECOMMEND TRAIL ON NORTH SIDE OF FOX STREET Mr. Smith sent a letter to the Park Commission regarding his opinion on whether park dedication fee or land should be taken as a result of his subdivision application. Smith asked that any decision on this maner be tabled to the August meeting when he can be in attendance. Howells moved, McMillan seconded to table the decision on Park Dedication for Items 4A and 4B until the August meeting. .A.yes 5, Nays 0. C. #1921 ULRICH, 1000 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - RECOMMEND MONEY Flint commented that all the propeny in the area is developed and saw no purpose in obtaining a small portion of trail easement in this area. McMillan moved, Wilson seconded, to recommend Park Dedication money be taken in lieu of land for tliis subdivision. Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGUXAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 13, 1995 QR (#4 - Consideration of Land Or Money for Park Dedication Fund - Continued) Park Commissioners discussed a possible trail along Fox Street. McMillan said the area is verv close to the Luce Line, parallels it, and would duplicate it. McMillan did not see the ne«i for a trail here. Flint responded that this goes to the nature of any traU which would be provided along Fox Street. If the Commissions purpose is to build oniy major anenes, then he agreed with McMillan. If the purpose is to provide smaller trails, then he did not. The park plan contemplates both t>"pes of trails. The Commission speculated on whether ftirther expansion of Fox Street or ^\atertown Road would occur and how this would affect trails and where they are placed, an whether separated or near a road. Wilson said serious bikers do not travel on Luce Line as it is not built for high speeds These bikers use the roads Wilson also commented that there is aood east-west route for bikers. It was noted that CoRd 6 has a narrow shoulder. Flim coiranemed if anv work were to be done on CoRd 6, it would appropriate to ask tor a separated trail. Wte commented on the difficulty of accessing the Luce Lme between Willow Drive and Brown Road since the road is high and the trail is low at that point. FUnt commented that the Commission needs to refine its trail plan to decide on which side of the road a future trail mav be built. Now is the time to decide this with respect to Fox Street. Flim cited the example of Old Crystal Bay Road trail. The utilities were on the ^ west side Placement of housing is also another criteria. If they are placed to the rear of properties away from the road, this is a good indicator for a trail, rather than homes close to the roads. Flint said each project will be different and never ltXy?'o one way Flint commented that with respect to this portion of Fox Street, the utilities poles as w ell as the homes near the street were on the soutli side of Fox Sueet wliich would make the north side the best choice if a trail w ere to be considered He pointed out that we w ere not now deciding whether to build the trail, but merely on which side to "bank" an easement m case a trail is decided upon at some future time. MaMillan cited the Brown Road trail She is concerned with all the efforts taken to gain small parcels ofland for trail segrnems Brown involved little cost, no easements, and no citizen complaints McMillan felt this was a good way to approach this idea of trails. Flint said this only works when major road construction is being done. McMillan felt it is necessary to piggyback onto these major developments after seeing how dificult it has been to obtain the trail on Old Cry stal Bay Road. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 13. 1995 Q^ ^ ^y (#4 - Consideration of Land or Money for Park Dedication Fund - Continued) Wilson said she is in favor of quantities of smaR narrow roads like Fox Street. She feels this type of atmosphere is what draws people to Orono and did not w ant the City to lose this. Wilson is in favor of separated trail segments along major artenes Flint agreed that there was no need to build a trail along Fox Street at this time. He also favored keeping Fox Street the narrow, winding road it is at this dme. But. he said, we also need to consider what mav happen in the future. The Citv' has a 66' easement on Fox Street; and instead of the 40* width now, the City could, at some future time, build a wider road with a separated bike trail and Iiavc no need to obtain any furtlier easements. If the City acquired trail easements at the present time, at some future time, it would have the option to build a narrow, off-road walking or walkmg/biking trail otit of the main right of way. McMillan did not think this was fair to homeowners, requiring them to have a trail in front of their homes, preferring winding, thru-the-woods type trails. Flint said this would allow the area to have a place to run or jog if the road were to change. Wilson emphasized the need to make any choices carefully. White said there are trails for transit and trails to meander thruout your neighborhood. White said he was in favor of drawing a community together Wilson commented that people come to Orono for privacy and would have chosen other areas if they wanted a community feel. Leaf Street was cited as a good example of a meandering road where a 2' walking path is sufficient. There is light traffic, and there would be no need for easements or for widening the road Wilson said she was concerned with private property rights and whether this would lower property values McMillan agreed with Wilson, adding that there is an east/west trail and a possible future trail on the Dakota rail. McMillan further noted that Mr. Smith was not ir. favor of a trail on Fox Street and reemphasized, with Willow’ Drive and Luce Trail, a Fox Street trail would be redundant. Flint said the discussion enabled the Commission to gain each others’ \iewpoint for a decision at the August meeting. He urged each Commissioner to view the property and think about tonight's discussion, so we could vote at the next meeting without rehashing the same discussion. fct MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION NffiETING HELD ON JULY 13, 1995 draft (#5) UPDATE ON CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGROUND (MCMILLAN) MrVfiTlan reported that tho fencing, plantings, and seeding has been done. The parking lot has been stancd. The ADA consultant has recommended that the playground equipment baiefitting handicapped children be installed at this time along with the other playground equipment. Earl Anderson Co. wiU be instaUing the regular playground equipment. The Council has been informed of the high bid received of S3,500 for the ADA play^ound equipment. Gerhardson is awaiting receipt of the other bid and will present to Council for approval. Since the Park Commission is aware of the high bid. there will be no need to present to the commission any other bid before going to Council. The ADA equipment consists of three pieces. The playground equipment has been ordered and is expected in 6-S weeks according to Gerhardson The timbers will be completed at that time also It was noted that the grading and pea rock installation will be done by City employees Howells asked if the ADA upgrade would be required at all parks. Gerhardson said this could be done as parks are upgraded. $14,227 has been approved to date by tl e Council. Total costs are $I8,9«-, which includes $2125 for the burying of the underground wires, and $2500 lor the pea rock The walkway, whose fuiiding has been approved, will be completed in conjunction with the parking lot. This, aloi g witn C remainder of the plantings, should be completed by fall. As mentioned above. The .\DA playground equipment is out for airther bid and has not been approved McMillan noted that neighbors have asked about fencing around the parking lot area to increase the level of safety. Gerhardson said this would intertere with the snow plowing. This area will have plantings instead (H6) UPDATE ON OPEN SPACE PLANNLNG PROCESS (GERHARDSON) The first phase questionnaire of the open space planning process is being reviewed. Gerhardson passed out the phase 2 questionnaire to the Park Commission members for their completion. (#7) REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF PROGRESS ON 1995 PARK COMMISSION ACTION PLAN Howells asked Gerhardson about the work awaiting Highvvood Nature Trail, item tf3 on the action plan. Howells said this was to nave been completed atier the load limits were lifted from the roadway s Gerhardson said he would put it on his schedule as soon as possible. Wilson will continue working with Gerhardson towards completion of the trail this fall. Howells will contact boy scout troop liaison for troop involvement at Highwood. «5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMM^ meeting held on JULY 13, 1995 BfAFT (f^7 - 1995 Park Commission Action Park Review - Continued) Gerhardsoo reported that the gravel base is in on the Brown Road sclent of the bike-hike trail, item #8a. The next step in the process will be the grading and paving, which has been contracted out. Modular block retaining walls will be incorporated into the steep banks on this segment of the trail. Commission members asked how this decision making process on retaining walls is done Gerhardson said the property ownei's are :ontacted, shown the alternatives currently on the market, and asked for theii opinion. Commission members asked that thev be included in this process for input on future landscape decisions One or two members will be contaaed in the future to assist in this decision making process Cormission members fed they have knowieuge to give and to gain in this area and wtiuld like to see a more natural look result instead of the locking block tvpe look. Item #10 on the action agenda concerns the park on thv Jickey property Ilse was waiting to receive Native American involvement in the planning process. White said Hennepin Parks experience was that it is preferable not to wait for their involvement but to go ahead with the planning process and then seek input from the Native American grovrps Flint said he asked Use to go forward with the planning process McMillan felt it was necessary to have a game plan in place. She said it was necessary to identify whether it would be a community or neighborhood-type park Wilson would like Ilse to come to the Commission with a plan prior to contacting any outside groups. Flint said Mayor Callahan had asked that the Park Commission move forward with the planning process. Individual ideas for the park were discussed. McMillan, who is on the con:mittee for this park, envisions a natural, quiet setting, self-suflident, memorial-like, with the landscape inco^orating a Native /\mencan feel W'hite H the geological background is interesting and would like to let people know what the area used to be like wivh the lake at the bottom of the hill White cited the example of Minnehaha Falls, which is a natural setting with a bronze plaque describing the area years ago Flint felt the Native American background was also very interesting, but that it was difficult to verify because it was laruelv unwritten W • McMillan will con'act Ilse and proceed with the project The memb-irs concluded that they desired to create i passive park with a living, spiritual-w-pe reminder of the area and what had been there taking advantage of the \iew, history and rural background ot the area It will not be an aenve park. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION ^ MEETING HEl D ON JULY 13. 1995 OR ■ (#8> OTHER BUSINESS C ommission members scheduled their ancndance at the upcoming Council meetings. It is their itnrfgrqaitfiin g that thcv arc to be in attendance for the beginning part of the Council meeting through the Park Commission comment section and anjr’ other agenda item thM would recpiire their attention for information or advisement. The schedule is as follows; 7/24 - White 8/14 - nse 8/28 - HoweUs 9/11 -McNfillan 9.'25 - Flim 10/9 White 10/23 - Howells The need for better maps was discussed at the meeting. WTiite will inv ’estigate the possibility of providi ig aerial maps and will report on his findings at the August meeting ANTOINE PARK Flir.' .-ought to the anention of the Park Commission a letter received from the Fagemess Point neighborhood concerning Antoine Park. The people in the neighborhood are concerned with the safety and age of the playground equipment The group is asking for the City to consider updating the equipment as well as adding sand or pea rock for safety should a fail occur. Members of this group will be in attendance at the August meeting to discuss the park. Flint was in favor of encouraging a neighborhood group, who would like to sec improvements made to their particular area, and backing this endeavor Due to money constraints, the Commissioners feel it is imponant for the City to receive the panicipation of the community. Raising funds for improvements and the adopt-a-park program for maintenance are examples where community involvement is needed. McMillan said if the equipment is no longer usable, the City should not leave the land without equipment. McMillan feels choices need to be made, people live in the r,:. hberhoods, and the Commission needs to answer their call for assistance. Wilson said the problem always comes dowTi to the Hinds needed for purchasing land or equipment. Wilson suggested meeting with the Council to bring together each group's ideoloeies. Flint commented on a finding by the .Minnesota Land Trust, v.no determined that a City is ahead money-wise by leaving land undeveloped. .Mthough no tax base is being created, no services are required either. Wilson agreed to provide a copy of this report to Commission members. S . t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO P.\RK CONtMlSSION meeting held on JLUY 13. 1995 qO | ADJOURNMENT Wilson raoved, NlcXCllan seconded, to adjouffi at 9:45 p.niL A>’cs 5, Na>'S 0. Richard N. Flint, Chair I? August 1,1995 i •• \ f"r ' • \z , *c» -=^’1:1 John GeiiiarcisoQ City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 ^UG 2 1995 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: The Casco Point Association wi:’'es to thank you and the city of Orono on behalf of all the residents of Casco Point for me Aing the Casco Circle Park just prior to the Fun Day on July 23,1995. The park looked great! The event was a huge success due, in large part, to all the support we received from the community and the city. Your support was acknowledged on a banner that day as well as in an article m the local paper. It was such a wonderful use for such a wonderful piece of property. Thank you again. C2&C0 Point /^sociation 1 r E005^ senior community servicesmi10709 Wayzata BMl.. Suite 111. Wnnetonka. MN 55305 Phone 541-1019 Fax 541 -084 1 ■OAiO0(oa«:Tora Otralyn Piiftr iotoZagaros t«Mo» WIRtam H. Oray Kavin Kniagar Tr IbmTIcan Marty Quritz Umtim-aUMf AlkoHlguchl Mary Andarson Nalaon Barg Lauraan Bodin John C. Boadar LucUla Crow Robart DaGhatto Dwight Johnson Tad Juda John Kaafa John Nalaon Sanator Qan Olaon Lawranca Schram Banjamin F. WHhhart fMCuttt* Oraciar A C£.0. PROGRAMS Community Sanlor Groups • H.O.M.E. Multl-purposa Sanlor Cantors • Sanlor Outraach • Sanlora Sarving Businasa AUnilcdVKtv Agenty ’ July 24, 1995 Mayor Edward Callahan Jr. and Council City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Orono. MN 55356 Dear Mayor Callahan and Council Members: Senior Community Services is requesting $13,124 from the City of Orono to support the operation of programs serving the local frail and elderly population for the 1996 calendar year. This is a 4% cost-of-living increase over the City ’s current level of support. The request is divided among three seperate programs as follows: 1. Senior Outreach Program 2. Tamarak (Long Lake) Senior Center 3. Westonka Senior Center $5,704 2,360 5,060 We have very much appreciated the City of Orono's support of senior programs. We look forward to continuing the relationship of cooperation including local church congregations (St. George's, Calvin Presbyterian and Trinity Lutheran), Westonka Rides. Westonka Seniors Inc., Westonka Community Services , local businesses, individuals and cities in order to provide the best services possible to area seniors. As in past years we also will be raising funds from the United Way, civic organizations, businesses and private individuals to support the programs. Sincerely, ijamin F. Withhart Executive Director cc: Ronald Moorse, City Administrator ORONO PLANNLNG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JLXY 17,1995 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the foUowing members preaent: Acting Chair Candace Rowlette, Sandra SmitK Dale Lindquist, and Janice Berg. Steve Peterson and Charles Schroeder were absent The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Adrmnistrator Jeam% Mabusth and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor CaOahan and Council Member Jabbour were present Acting Chair Rowlette called the meeting to ord^ at 7 00 p m PUBLIC HEARING/PXJBUC INFORMATION MEETING #2025 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 WA l ERTOWN ROAD - VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY' EASEMENT, 7:00-7:03 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and i\ffidavit of Publication were noted IMr. Plank was not in attendance. Mabusth reported that the application is for the vacation of the drainage and utility easement located on either side of the division lines of Lots 2 and 3 originally platted in 1986 as pan of the Maple Place subdivision As pan of this current application, lot lines have been redrawn, and the casement serves no public purpose in its current configuration. New drainage and utility easements will be designated along the newly defined shared lot liiw There were no public comments Lindquist moved. Berg seconded, to approve .Application #2025 per Stall recommendations. Ayes 4, Nays 0. ACTION ITEMS («) #2026 NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE, 875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:03-7:13 P.M. Sharon Bergen represented New Horizon Child Care This application had been tabled from the last meeting to allow applicant time to look at scaling back the size of the signs and to speak with Mn'DOT concerning the entrance/exit siun It was discovered that Nla'DOT has no specific signage applicable lor a daycare use but volunteered to assist in locating the right-of-way upon the installation of the sign. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PL.\NNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 (#2 - #2026 New Horizon Child Care - Continued) Mabusth said the applicant has presented two options for the main signage. One option is a 4-I/2x4-l/T single sided sign to be attached to the facility The other altematix e is a free-standing sign, 4-l/'2x4-l/2 ‘, smaller than originally proposed, but located in the same place at a lower height. The entrance pylon is also reduced in size to 4'x4' at a height of I3’8". The sign contractor has provided the electrical specifications as required Nnv Horizon will install timers on the siims and turn the lights off at a prescribed time if recommended as the facility is in a residential area Smith asked if this was at the request of the City or a company policy Bergen said there w as no set company policy Such detemnnations were made by the neighborhood within the City the child care center is located. If the center is in a commercial setting. New Horizon generally does not put timers on their iHuminited signs. The child care center in Wayzata was noted as being in a cornnKfcial zone with similar lighting and brightness of illumination Lindquist recommended the entrance sign include the verbage, "entrance* Smith and Rowlette agreed as the entrance is difficult to detect. There were no public comments Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2026 for one sign on the building, option #1, an entry sign with additional verbage to indicate the entrance, and an illuminated apron, both apron and building sign’s illumination to be controlled by timers .Appropriate hours of illumination will be worked out with Staff. Smith noted people using tliw Luce Line do not wish to see lighted signs Ayes 4. Nays 0 (#3) «0J2 MICHAEL AND LY NNE GERHLICHER. 1375 REST POINT ROAD- VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:13-7:28 P..M. The Certificate of Mailinu and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr. Gerhlichei was present. Mabiisth reponed that the application is for height and rear/street lot line setback for fencing exceeding the 3-1/2' height requirement The fencing will replace a former privacy fence The height of the fence averages 6 to 6-1/2' in height w ith 7* at center posts and 5' at the mid section The fencing is located oi»t of the 75' setback area and w ill be reinstalled on the side lot line. The average lakeshore setback is m^^t, and the fence will have no visual impact on the seasonal cabin next door. Lindquist asked if the 1977 survey is the latest surv ey available Mabusth said it w as and noted that the lot lines have not charged MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMKflSSION MEETING HELD ON JLT.Y 17, 1995 (#3 -1^032 Mjchad & Lynne Gerhlicher - Contimied) The applicant presented photographs of the old and new fencing to the Commission metnbers. The new fencing is the same type as used on a property across the street from sid)fect ivoperty. Rowlette roul into the minutes a letto' with IS signatum from neighbors appro\ing the fence. Smith v'oic^ concern with allowing fencmg that does not meet City code and possibly creating alleyways of fencing. Lindquist said these concerns are valid but noted that the fencmg was a replacement. A recent application approval for a fence in the Narrows area was cited, which .Smith noted she did nert vote in favor of Smith questioned whether members would approve a new fence that was not within the 42" standard Mabusth a^ed if Commissioners would like to review the statement of hardship Smith said she was aware of the statement and noted the good quality of the fencing being used, but her concern was with where the fencing issi>e was going in the futore Rowlette asked how many homes (6) were beyond the applicant's due to poor sight lines. The applicant added that being on top of a hill created the problem of car headlights shining into their home. Mr. Gerhlicher said he was out of towm alot, and the fence would help create a sense of security for his home Rowlette added that the fence did fit the scheme of the property She asked if bushes could be cleared to improve the sight lines The applicant said this could be done Smith asked if more space could be left on either side of the dnve The applicant said this was possible, but the posts were already in place, as this area is not where a variance is required There were no public comments. Rowlette moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2032 for required setback and height variance with the condition that the applicant work with Staff on improving sicht lines at the entrance through clearing of vegetation Ayes 3. Nays 1, Smith Nay Smith said fencing should be lower and was concerned with creating alleyways of fencing. (#4) #2033 DONALD AND ARLENE KIELLEY, 1670 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:2S-7:5I P..\I. The Cenificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Kielley and his contractor. Mr. Roelofs, were present. MINXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17. 1995 (#4 - #2033 - Donald Sc Arlene Kielley - Continued) Mabusth reported that an application was approved in 19S2 for a variance for a detached garage. Excess hardcover was found over the amount approved in 1982. An expansion of paved area was found adjacent to the garage This was not installed by the current applicant A detached shed had been removed, but a connecting walkway between both {^ructures was to have been removed and had not been 166 s f of hardcover was added in a rock area underlined with plastic Hardcover calculations have been adiusted The current application is for a 10-I/rx42-l/2’ addition to the street side ot the residence. The floor plan was reviewed and calls for an expansion of a family room, a formal entrance, and a covered deck area. With the addition, lot coverage would increase by 510 s.f or 3 5% 15% lot coverage is allowed Lot coverage exists at 15 6®b With the proposed addition, lot coverage would be at 19 1%. 4 l“o over the allowed amount A hardcover reduction of 4 8% in the 0-75’ setback zone was noted Hardcover in the 75- 250' zone exists at 51.6% and is proposed at 52 8* « Total hardcover increase would be 113 s f or 0 %%. A side setback variance of 4’ would also be required The structure is presently at 8" and the addition is proposed at 6'. Smith suggested the triangle area of rock and concrete area between the two garages be removed Smith noted that part of the new hardcover will be placed ov er non-structural hardcover Lindquist agreed with the suggested removal Lindquist asked what material would be used for the new walkway It will be of a concrete-ty pe material as it is now Mabusth said elimination of these two areas would result in reductions of 126 s f, or 1.3%. in the 75-250’ zone for the plastic underlayment and 98 s f of concrete, or 1%, for the area between the garages, for a total of 2 3*?b. Other removal consists of 540 s.f of plastic, or 5.5%. but is also non-structural. Mabusth asked if there were drainage concerns on the propeny noting erosion on the north side The applicant said a small basement under the nonh corner does get damp It was found that no gutters are planned Roelof said the problem lies with the gabled ends being on a down slope but is not a critical problem Kielley said he was concerned with removing the rock on the north side because of the drainage Lindquist said the concrete and plastic would have to be removed but gravel was okav Smith and Rowictte said they both preferred to see this area green Smith said she would be okav with gravel if drainage was a problem Lindquist asked that the applicant work with Stall'on this issue Berg suggested regrading of the area There were no public comments The ha»‘dcover removal as planned and suggestefJ would result in u decrease of about lO'l'o Rowictte said the resolution should state for the record a hold on any fliture structural improvements unless existing structure is removed to otfsei any new structure \IINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLXY 17, 1995 (#4 - i^2033 Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) Rowktte said a ade variance prefented no problem in her view as the next residence over was a fair distance away. Lindquia moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #2033 with the condition that all plastic areas be removed as well as the concrete and gravel areas The removal of the rock on the north side will be dependent on Staff findings concerning drainage. It shall be ftmher noted that this woula be the maximum amount of struaural coverage allowed on this propertv' in the fijture without removal of existing staicture Ayes 4, Nays 0 (#5) #2034 MARY AND GENE ZULK, 1400 CHERRY PIACE - V ARIANCES - PUBUC HEARING 7;5I-8:0I P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. Mr Zulk was present. This application is for a 10x26’ covered deck addition on the street side A structural coverage variance is required. Structural coverage exists at 17 6®o, allowed at 15’o. and is proposed at 19 9®V for an increase of 265 s f. or 2 3% Mabusth reported that hardcov'cr can be reduced in the 75*250' zone with the removal ot a rock patio at northeast side of residence of 175 s 1 Hardcov er exists at 49.2® b, proposed at 51.8/ o, tor an additional 213 s f, or 2.64®® No side setback variance is required Mabusth asked the applicant if there was any existing hardcover areas that could be removed to offset the hardcover amount. Zulk said he had no drainage problems and suggested removal of the stone patio on the northeast side Lindquist asked about the walkway on the nonh side of the propeny This was found to be used to access the lower level There are stairs to access this level, and Zulk said the sidewalk underneath could be removed, but decking will be placed over this area. Lindquist said, although he wav unhappy with additional hardcover, he saw no area where removal could be done to offset the new Mabusth noted with the removal of the 175 s.f or 2 2®/® of patio hardcover, there would be an overall reduaion in hardcover This results in less hardcover than originally existed There were no public comments. Commission asked that a disclaimer be added to the resolution allowing no more structural improvements on this propeny m the future without removal of existing structures. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLXY 17, 1995 (#5 - U203A Mary A Gene Zulk - Continued) Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2034 for a covered deck additicHi to the street side \^ith removal of the stoiw patio on the northeast. ith the disclaimer of allowing no additional structural improvements on the property in the future without the removal of existing structure. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) #2036 ROBERT J. GOUTANIS, 1098 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARL4NCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:01-8:37 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Goutanis was present. Mabusth reported that the original residence was built in 1934 The garage encroaches 6" into the public right-of-way. which is a lakeshore access uswl year arcnind with a swimming dock Structural failings have been found within the existing foundation The applicant proposes 3x8 ’ rounding off of the structure at the southeast and northeast comers The applicant has proposed three options by which to proceed and is asking for a recommendation from the Planning Commission as to which option they would approve Case #l would involve partial foundation repairs at the lakeside with an renovation of the fust floor only. Tlie condition of the remaining foundation would not enable any expansion of the second floor Case #2 involves a complete replacement of the foundation Both cases I and 2 would require the house to be raised In this case, improvements would also be made to the second floor level, all within the same footprint There would be a slight encroachment of the lakeshtire yard by the steps and stoop of 4 ’ The detached garage would stay the same at 24x22', as in case #1, w ith side relocation of the garage door. The 6" encroachment would remain. Hardcover statistics reflect the increase in hardcover \ side setback variance is needed in this case Case #3 would relocate the home fimher away from the lake with the same footprint. It would improve the left side setback to 10’. where house is 6-1/2' from lot line The garage would be the same but would now be attached and still encroach 6" The upper level improvements would now include a deck to the lakeside This would not involve any encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line as it would not e.xtend beyond the given footprint located tlirther away from lake Lindquist asked if the Commission could approve an application that encroaches on the public righl-of-wav Mabusth leplied that she would hope ilii.s wxiuld not occur MLNUTES of the ORONO PL.ANN1NG CONLMISSION [VffiETING HELD ON JL1.Y 17, 1995(#6 - #2036 Robert Goutanis - Continued)The appficant said if the Commisson would approve a two-car garage, he would be wilKi^ to locate it wheiever necessary to remove the 6” encroachment The 24* garage dimenson was set arbitrarily by the ^^plicam as Gountaris said most municipalities require 528 s.f mtiuiiium garage size today. If Staff or Planning Commission recommended a reduction in size, the af^i^cant said a 22x22* garage would be satisfactory. Rowlette asked if the side setback required is 10* \labusth said that is true, but the setback to the lake is also an isaie. If the garage were to be moved 10* with side loading doors, tiare would be no room for a car to back up, enter, or exit. Rowlette commented moving the foundation makes this application new construction. It was further noted that some kind of variance would be needed on this property for any building changes at all as majority' of lot is located within lakeshore protected area. Gountanis said it was his attempt to minimize hardcover in the lakeshore area and „way from the neighbors. Lindquist asked Gountanis what his preference was in relation to the three options. Gountanis said case # 1 was the simpliest. Case #2 provided tor more space but still presented problems with the foundation. Case #3 would be most cost effective to start over again and replace in the best area for the property Gountanis agrees that the garage should be moved at least 6" and would be easier accomplished by building a new garage. Case #3 is his preference, but said it would come down to the money approved by his lender on whether his choice would be case 1 or 3. Smith inquired about the history of the property. The previous owner, Mr. Herman, had used it as his secondary residence. It had been homesteaded in 1974-81. It has not been occupied for several years. Bill Bachman, 1090 Loma Linda, whose property lies north of the subject property, said he would 'ike to see the property restored He has no reservations on the proposals presented. Gountanis said he had spoken with Bachman concerning improvements. Bachman had said he improved his own property in 1990 with tunneling under and pouring the foundation to save the residence Mabusth commented that this residence is not located in the 0-75’ zone Rowlette said case # 1 would have a bandaid-type affect. It was her recommendation to keep structural coverage at 1500 s.f maximum and would only approve case #3, providing the garage be moved allowing safe egress and ingress Rowlette further noted that leaving the property as seasonal would not solve any problems and remain an ey esore. It was commented that there would be no average lakeshore issue or any visual impact on the neighbors MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 T . f.1 \th.. i ' rrv' (#6 - #2036 Robert Goutanis - Continued) Undquist commented that with the 1000 s f house, it would leave less than 500 s f. for the garage. The applicant proposes the house at 980 s.t. with a 2-x2- garage tor a total of 1492 s.f Rowlette recommended moving the garage 3' at the most. Mayor Callahan suggested moving the garage back parallel with the house and changing the curb cut, Gcuntanis responded that the lot was only 48' wide, and the turning radius from the garage area would be affected if the garage were to be moved that fai noith It wa.s explained that this would allow the applicant to enter the garage from the public access side. Gountanis asked if this improvement would be paid by the City Mabusth said it would be at the expense of the applicant to make the upgrade. Rowlette and Lindquist said the blacktopping would not add any major cost to repairs already projected. Tim Osgood, 1045 Loma Linda, said the public right-of-w ay is a fire lane. If blacktop were to be installed, it would create a problem with attracting more people into using the right-of-way as a landing. The public use this access to park at since the parking along North Shore Drive was prohibited. Ann Stevens, co-owner with Gountanis, soul the blacktopping would make the road more accessible and would not favor this option. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application »20.36 for Case ^3 as outlined with ma.\imum structural coverage of 1500 s.f.. The garage may no longer encroach into the public landing area and must be set back a minimum of 3' from the lot line. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#7) #2037 W'AY'ZATA LEARNING CENTER. 850 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONTINUED AT A FUTURE MEETING Application #2037 will be continued at a ftitu.e meeting. (#8) #2038 DICK HEIT, 1153 ELMWOOD A\TM E - V ARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:42-9:00 P.IVI. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. licit -nd his contractor were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAINING COVLMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 (#8 - #2038 Dick Heit - Continued) Mabusth reported that the application is for a 10x28' two-story addition to the lakeside of the residence. The present lower level screened porch will be replaced with another screened porch and open deck. The upper level will include an extension of the dining room, instead of an enclosed porch as originally proposed, and a deck. Hardcover improvements exist as they were in the 1980's review; no new improvements have been installed. A City turnaround was probably not included in the prior calculations Hardcover calculations now include areas of both lots. The property is made up ol two lots Rowlette asked if there was a drainage problem on the north side ot the lot. The applicant said there had been but was in the process of st)lving the problem through drain tiling Heit has dug a ditch to install the drain tile. It was suggested that the rock area not be driven over to prevent erosion. Mabusth reported that there is a vacant lot adjacent to the property. An average lakeshore setback variance is required but opined that the proposed additional encroachment ot - would not impact adjacent properties, noting the vacant unbuildable lot to north side, one residence to south on higher elevations located 90'+ from shared lot line. Lindquist asked if part of the garage encroached onto Elmwood. It was found that the road was not in the platted right of way but located in applicant's eastern lot. Applicant's garage and driveway are located in street right of way.. There were no public comments. The hardcover in the 0-75' zone is not structural but a stairway. The large amount of hardcover in the 75-250' zone included the large turnaround installed by the City Mabusth asked the applicant to combine the two lots as part of the application. It was noted that two lots that do not abut each other can be combined as long as the City approves. The additional 2" proposed into the side yard setback is caused by the angle ol the addition This setback is to the vacant lot side of the property The applicant noted that he was informed that the owner of the 50' lot cannot build on a lot that narrow. Mabusth confirmed this from an earlier variance application Berg moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application ^?2038 for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover variances to include the legal combination of Lots 8 and 19. and the removal of the landscape areas as shown. Stalfhas been asked to have the City Engineer look at the erosion problem on the north side and make any determinations necessary Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 (W) #2040 DOUG OLSON, 2601 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:00-9:16 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Jim Smith represented the applicant. Mabusth reported that the application is to remove and replace existing concrete patio around the pool area in the 0-75' zone with interlocking pavers in a sand bed Tlie City considers this hardcover, while the DN'R considers it softcover. 170 s.f of patio and 65 s.f. of stepping pads will be restored to grass. The applicant has provided an updated survey locating the pool and patio in relation to the shoreline. The closest portion of the patio to the lake is at 24’. The proposed hardcover shows a reduction of 0.76“o or 235 s f Mabusth said the property has over 800 ’ of shoreline. There is an existing walkway to the dock area. Considerable hardcover has already been reduced w ith the remov al of the 15x15 ’ boathouse foundation and the walkway around the peninsula area The property is a seasonal residence for the applicant Future goals are a new entry and a bedroom addition over the garage It Is the applicant's intention to convert residence to their primary residence. It was purchased in 1994 and has seen major cleaning up of the property since that time The shoreline has been riprapped. A hillside along the lake has been planted. Plastic underlaymeni has been removed and replanting has occurred. J. Smith said the applicant has spent $120,000 in clean up. J. Smith said the concrete patio under consideration has cracked and the replacement is part of the clean up project This oatio area is the closest hardcover surface by the pool and has been reduced in size. J Smith noted that the driveway serv-es three homes and also as a turnaround The owners would like to change this. The new entry will eliminate the driveway turnaround. Updated hardcover calculations and survey will be done when more improvements are made. Rowlette recommended the removal of the stepping stones to the dock area. J. Smith said the stones to the dock make logical sense, where the other stones did not. J.Smith ftirther noted that 300 ’ have already been taken out in stepping stones and about 2000 s.f in total hardcover removal throughout the clean-up process. The applicant ’s willingness to remove hardcover and clean up the property was noted. j. Smith asked for clarification on the approach to the pool area Other than through the side lawn area, the patio is the tnain approach to the pool area MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 (#9 - #2040 Doug Olson - Continued) Mahusth noted that the peninsula shape of the lot places major portions ol property wthin tlw 0-75* zone. Lindqui^ said any consideration by the applicant to rcmo\*e the stepping stones to the dock would be appreciated. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2040 for the removal and replacement of the concrete pad around the pool with the l enioval ol 65 s i of stones and 170 s.f of patio concrete to be replaced with grass Ayes 3, Nays 1. Row lette Nay. Rowlette's recommendation is for all the stepping stones to be removed. Smith said he will make that recommendation to the Olson’s and amend the application if approval is given. (#10) #2041 PHIL AND DARCY OTTO, 4116 HIGHWOOD ROAD - AFTER- THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 9:16-9:43 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. Mr. & Mrs. Otto were present. Mabusth reported that grading plans had been approved with the building permit. Through the process in working within the steep banks in front of residence, additional cuts were made which will require additional and higher retaining walls. The area was e.\cavated further than originally proposed when the structure was erected and well installed. The Engineer has reviewed the specifications for retaining walls and accepted them. Drainage tiles to rear of wall were noted and drained to the rear of the property. A second curb cut was created with an island for salety reasons Gerhardson approved the curb cut. Smith asked if the direction of the wall was changed and taken by the initiative of the applicant. Otto said he had thought the well people had contacted the City Mabusth said the City has no authority to issue permits for wells. This was the responsibility of the applicant Rowlette noted that the applicant had commented to her when she visited the property that the house was not placed in the envelope as originally specified The house placement was skewered by the guidelines of the setback. The original placement made the entry into the garage difficult and the e.xit impossible Lindquist commented that the two curb cuts seemed to make sense. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17. 1995 (#10 - #2041 PhU & Darcy Otto - Continued) Mabusth said additional fill firom the excavation was placed in the rear yard. The Otto's are »tt<»mpring to provided a gentler slope to the rear yard. The problem at the east side h— been intoisified. The problem now is how to deal with the finished elevations at the east jwd at 15' width and maintain 2:1 slope, and also allow walking access to rear yard. Mabusth said it would be necessary to contact the property owner to the east to gain approval of any encroachment The property is possibly in the in the process of going tax foifdt. Mabusth said detail on elevations, catch basins, and final grades arc needed Planning Commission is unable to make any fimher recommendations until the criteria established engineer is addressed. Mabusth asked the Commission if they prefer to revisit the application prior to going to the Council. The landscaping plan would be done at that point. The Commission had no problem with the application going forward if it met the criteria of the Engineer. It was recommended that the landscape architect work with the City Engineer. Glen Sauer of 4104 Highwood reported his concern with drainage fi-om this lot exceeding the capacity of the ditch and retaining pond on his property Sauer does not want this property to further impact his yard Pictures trem heavy rains in 1978 and 1987 were shown to eiTiphasize the problems Sauer said he was concerned with the filling in the Otto s back yard and the change in the slope in that area. It is Sauer's opinion that how fast the drainage flows does not matter. Sauer says it all wall eventually go through the 20' culvert with 8" tiles. He does not want any fill to hamper any of the retention areas It was noted that the gentler slope may aid in water seeping down into the ground of the Otto property Mabusth said the fill and sod should decrease the velocity of the flow Sauer said there is no more storage capacity available. Mabusth said she would have Glerm Cook review the drainage issue with Shawn Gustafson. Cook is familiar with the drainage history of the area. The Planning Commissioners said this fimher information will need to be studied. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2041 for fimher engineering review by City Engineer Cook. Planning Commission would like to receive confirmation on what will occur to the retention areas further downstream Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAN'NING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#11) #2035 MICHAEL HILBEUNK, 2760 W ATERTOWN ROAD - SKETCH f LANySUBDIVTSlON/CONCEPTUAL REVIEW Mabusth reported that the plan is for a 4-lot subdivision of the former Rosch property at the northeast quadrant of Old Crystal Bay Road and W'atertovr n Road. The parcel is 9- i/2 acres in size. Access for three lots is proposed via a private road and cul-de-sac The applicant is asking for lot 4 to be accessed from an e.\isting driveway on Watenown Road Mabusth noted that during the review of the Peterman Addition to the immediate east, the City did not seek access to this propeny Access to this property would be resolved with future division. The proposal recommends a cul-de-sac with a private road and a single curb cut for lot 4 from the south. Additional concern is also for the bike trail on the west side of the propeny. Conceptual plans arc for the septic to be located in this area The Applicant met with Gerhardson and Cook, who said the trail would run 500-600’ down the length of the propeny with a 15 ’ easement and cutting back to the road side of the trees Mabusth said this should not impact the septic site but noted the need lor a 20' separation. Mabusth commented on the design of road with a 60' wide road and 120' cul-de-sac. The code asks for 50' wide road and 100' cul-de-sac. Mabusth asked the Planning Commission lor their views on additional curb cut. The drainage issues need to l>e addressed al.v) A berm funnels water along Watenow n Road. A culven built in 1987 was installed beneath existing access drive to lot 4. The applicant commented that two old drain tiles were found on Lots 1 and 2 draining from Goldenview to the east. Mabusth said this should be investigated funher with the review of this subdivision. Lindquist commented that the access for Lot 4 seemed to be the logical choice but did recommend the private road to be 50' wide with a 100 cul-de-sac. It was noted that there is no problem with sight lines and distance for the 40 mph Watenown Road. Mabusth said no action is required at this time and recommended the applicant proceed with tiling preliminary plans and need for complete septic testing and soil delineation requirements. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17, 1995 (#11- #2035 Michael Hilbelink - Continued) Council Member Jabbour commented that with any sketch plan, the Park Commission should receive the application between the sketch plan and preliminary plat tor their review. Mabusth said Flint has been coordinating these effons The Park Commission will review these plans at their August 7 meeting prior to the application coming to the Planning Commission for further review Rowlette asked that the Park Commission recommendation be part of the packet. The minutes ot the Park Commission meeting will suffice. It was recommended that a Park Commission member be present at the Planning Commission meeting to review boili sketch and preliminary plans and subdivision replications. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#12) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10,1995 (SANDY SMITH) Smith reported on the approval of the Sailors World and James Bruce applications. Smith said the Council had similar problems with application issues but voted for approval The Plank application was approved. Smith reported that the Planning Commission will be asked to review the driveway/private road guidelines A workshop will be scheduled. Smith reported Jabbour as saying, "all driveways arc not created equal", and Callahan as sayimt, "the current ordinance has worked well for the last 25 years A two-month moratorium was placed on subdivisions addressing this issue It was noted that another moratorium was approved for a six month period on any development north of Hwy 12 in order to allow time to study the Hwy 12 comprehensive plan amendment. (#13) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION It was suggested that a member of the Park Commission be present at the Planning Commission meetings when an agenda item is a sketch plan that would be of interest to the Park Commission Representatives will be scheduled to attend Park Commission meetings The Park Commission meeting agenda will be reviewed by the representative, who will attend the meeting if there are any items on the agenda requiring the attention of the Planning Commission. Rowlettte will attend the Park Commission meeting on August 7, 1995. REPORT HER. BPRMTISS-l DATB OP RUN 08/01/95PERMIT TTPtBuilding SQL PAMlLY-NBW SP-AOD/RBMOOBL SP-ACC STRUCTURE MMO/PRINCIPAL IN8T-AOD/RBMODSL DBMO-ACCBSSCNIY ACC/GARAGBSSub-total Nachanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITICWING HOOD STOVE/FLUB FIREPLACE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT NORK (»ILY RratOVB OIL TANK Sub-total Plunbini PlXTUREi MATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sawar k Mater SEMER CONNECTION MEM SEPTIC SYSTE SAC ONLY SEMER k WATER Sub-total Sign PERf^ENT/ POSTED TEMPORARY Sub-total User Defined RETAINING WALLS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY PERMITS ISSUH)/ETES CQLI£CTED PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO JULY 1995* * * * *PAGE > 1REQUESTER; CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 07/01/95 - 07/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 07/01/94 - 07/31/94BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 4 18 4 2 0 2 9,516.50 2,911.25 686.50 190.00 0.00 80.00 1,631,000.00 189,366.00 42,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.185.72 1.121.73 446.23 0.00 0.00 n on 1 19 1 2 2 A 1,028.00 1,452.50 284.50 100.00 762.50 211,000.00 106,403.00 30,000.00 0.00 90,340.00 668.20 591.83 184.93 0.00 281.13 3 33* 383.00 13,767.25* 23,000.00 1,885,866.00* U • u u 235.30 7,988.98* U 4 29* 0.00 459.00 4,086.50* 0.00 44,280.00 482,103.00* 0.00 339.30 2,065.39* € S Qa 1 0 0 481.13 305.00 0.00 280.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 37.690.00 20.850.00 0.00 8,600.00 500.00 0.00 0 on 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A r\ 7 1 1 2 0 1 553.11 35.<j0 35.00 70.00 0.00 35.00 40,617.84 1,160.00 1,100.00 2,500.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20*1,101.13*67,640.00* U . 00 0.00* 2 14* 70.00 798.11* 2,450.00 40,827.84* 0.00 0.00* 13 1 1 15* 1,011.25 35.00 35.00 1,081.25* 65,440.16 1,200.00 300.00 66,940.16* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 9 1 0 10* 798.69 235.00 0.00 1,033.69* 57,248.00 0.00 0.00 57,248.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 10 I 0 11* 0.00 1,000.00 850.00 0.00 1,850.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 1 1 2 6* 70.00 100.00 800.00 140.00 1,110.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 1 2* 35.00 30.00 65.00* 0.00 0.00o.oc* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 1 1* 0.00 35.00 35.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 2 3* 35.00 70.00 105.00* 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 82**17,899.63**020,446.16**7,900.98**62**7,133.30**589,678.84**2,065.39** ,, REPORT MBR. BPBBRPTl-1 ’ DATE or RON 08/01/P5 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLI£CTEDBASB FBB PLAN RBVIEN BUILDING13,767.257,988.98 SURCHAROB 945.29 Lie. SEARCH FBB 0.00 SAC 0.00 INVBSTZOATlOll 2,186.75 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN PERMIT TOTAL 24,888.27 • * , •••• • . report NBR. BFEERPTl-1DATB OP RUN 08/01/95 Report total BASE FEB 17,899.63 PLAN REVIEW 7,988.90 SURCHARGE 1,020.52 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 SAC 0.00 INVESTIGATION 2,221.75 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 28.00 PERMIT TOTAL 29,158.88 mechanical1,101.13 0.00 34.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.50 1,154.71 '*• PERMIT FEE REPORT *****ORONOFROM 07/01/95 TO 07/31/95PLUMBING SEWER & WATER1,081.250.00 35.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 1,125.40 1.850.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.855.00 * * • * *PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** Of ORONOFROM 07/01/95 TO 07/31/95 JULY 1995USER35.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 35.00 PAGE s 3 0REQUESTER: CAROLESIGN65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIRE0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 :VIW». 'MTUB AOO 1, *^95, 4:11 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1995 PAGE 1PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 13C MB 01 8501277501409901296502995 04 4040 04 4064 06 1925 06 1170 06 4360 06 1115 06 930 06 3085 06 4485 06 890 09 2650 09 2905 10 3745 11 3472 11 1241 11 4105 11 575 11 740 15 2675 16 2705 16 1725 17 4040 17 1400 24 1233 24 585 29 630 29 2630 30 575 33C 01 2630 01 2545 01 1420 01 3445 01 1400 01 4590 01 2635 01 2630 01 2350 01 4620 01 2820 01 1261 02 2010 02 3405 02 996 02 1400 02 2605 02 575 24 3620 CRISTOFORI CIR COUNTRYSIDE DR W HIGHWOOD RD DEER RUN TR WILDHURST TR WATERTOWN RD NORTH SHORE DR COUNTRY CLUB RD LYMAN AVE BAYSIDE RD WILLOW DR S COX FARM RD WATERTOWN RD BAYSIDE RD FOREST ARMS LA SILVER VIEW DR DEER RUN TR TOGO RD LIVINGSTON AVE BROWN RD S OAK ST OXFORD RD BROWN RD N SILVER VIEW DR WATERTOWN RD BOHNS PT RD WATERTOWN RD BRACKETTS POINT RD BRIAR ST OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD PARK LA COUNTRYSIDE DR W OXFORD RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W KELLY AVE BRACKETTS POINT RD SHORELINE DR BRACKETTS POINT RD NORTH ARM DR W COUNTRYSIDE DR W COUNTRYSIDE DR W SHADOWOOD DR TONKAVIEW LA DEER RUN TR ARBOR ST COLIN DR WATERTOWN RD NORTH ARM DR BRACKETTS POINT RD KELLY AVE OXFORD RD EILEEN ST 95/07/03 OR- 95/07/11 OR- 95/07/19 OR- 95/07/25 OR- 95/07/27 OR- 95/07/11 OR- 95/07/25 OR- 95/07/07 OR- 95/07/07 OR- 95/07/06 OR- 95/07/20 OR- 95/07/10 OR- 95/07/21 OR- 95/07/21 OR- 95/07/25 OR- 95/07/06 OR- 95/07/27 OR- 95/07/20 OR- 95/07/06 OR- 95/07/10 OR- 95/07/14 Ok- 95/07/21 OR- 95/07/28 OR- 95/07/06 OR- 95/07/17 OR- 95/07/18 OR- 95/07/11 OR 95/07/26 OR 95/07/11 OR 95/07/26 OR 95/07/19 OR 95/07/10 OR 95/07/12 OR 007107007130007164007186007187 007128 007174 007125 007127 007129 007152 007158 007175 -007176 -007185 -007121 -007189 -007169 -007119 -007133 -007146 -007170 -007195 -007120 -007157 -007159 -007140 -007163 -007137 -007192 -007141 -007153 -007064 95/07/03 95/07/03 95/07/03 95/07/06 95/07/10 95/07/13 95/07/17 95/07/18 95/07/10 95/07/21 95/07/25 95/07/27 95/07/06 95/07/06 95/07/13 95/07/17 95/07/19 95/07/19 95/07/17 OR-007113 OR-007115 OR-007116 OR-007131 OR-007134 OR-007142 OR-007155 OR-0071G0 OR-007162 OR-007173 OR-007104 OR-007190 OR-007122 OR 007124 OR-007144 OR-00715G OR-007166 OR-007160 OR-007154 0000000015590251000000001934046100000000 14049022 16993135 00000000 18277636 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 14725547 00000000 15429000 15429000 10071613 00000000 14793030 18238046 10238046 00000000 15300479 00000000 14751160 00000000 17067711 18612461 15460160 14768403 15590251 14540456 15590251 35595900 36332561 34735202 34071061 36332561 34932477 15507609 34422417 36332561 30940005 39296767 39296767 39414211 35453797 34071061 35453797 34202026 39414211 EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INCPETER ANDREA CO BROWNING CONST INC 1ST LANDMARK BUILDERS KIT-DRY ENTERPRISES TAYLOR JIM DALPHIM POOL i SPA DALPHIN POOL 6 SPA BUDGET EXTERIORS INC GRAVELLE, STEPHEN SELA ROOFING SELA ROOFING DAHL STEVE CONST TAYLOR KATHERINE KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST NORDIC WINDOW CO TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO LUCAS DESIGN WORKS EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC SPORT COURT EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO FIRESIDE CORNER MINNETONKA REFRIGERATION DOODY MECHANICAL INC FIRESIDE CORNER HEATING k COOLING TWO TONY EIDEN CO LINDEMEIER SERVICES FIRESIDE CORNER BURNSVILLE HEATING CO VOGT FRED k CO VOGT FRED fit CO KLEVE HTG fii AC M H SEIFERT CONST DOODY MECHANICAL INC M H SEIFERT CONST PRACTICAL SYSTEMS KLEVE HTG k AC KIJAPPSERANLAVERE SMIEJA JONES FREDEEN MCFADDEN OLSON GABRIELSON HANSON SMIEJA WELLS CLARK CROTTEAU POAGE MACKEY VERSAILLES DROWN ALBERS STARK MABUSTH ISAACS CASHMAN SMIEJA JUNDT FRANK DERGGREN WROBLEWSKI EIDEN STARK JUNDT JUNDT EIDEN GROBE BILLINSKI PETERSON NIVIN ESKOLA HEIDORM JUNDT STODDARD STARK WHITMAN 750,275,136,470,60, IB, 7, 2, 6, 2, 1, 18, 8, 1, 2, IB, le, 10, 2, 4, 17, 11. 4, 000.00 000.00 000 000 000 000 700 340 900 944 000 000 000 300 000 000 000 086 000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 12, 3. 8, 20, 7, 300.00 376.00 150.00 000.00 000.00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 800 470 000 000 000 1,200.00 1,000.00 1,100.00 6,200.00 6,000.00 1,100.00 5.300.00 1.100.00 7.390.00 1.100.00 13,000.00 2,000.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 9,800.00 1,000.00 500.00 1,250.00 rUB, AUO 1, 199S, 4:11 PMI’BRMITS ISSUED FOR TUB MONTH OF JULY 1995PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PAGE 2FOREST LAKE LANDING20C20CPL012875DEER RUN TR011400BRACKETTS POINT RD012350SHADOWOOD DR012650SILVER VIEW DR011945FAGERNESS POINT RD012820DEER RUN TR01:870 6TH AVB N 01 2735 COUNTRYSIDE DR 02 2860 DEER RUN TR 07 3445 SHORELINE DR 19 3222 NORTH SHORE DR 24 2970 CASCO POINT RD 29 225 OLD CRYSTAL I^AY RD N 29 2090 WEBBER HILLS RD 29 630 PARK LA 15C 15C SI 13 2060 6TH AVE N 13 3445 SHORELINE DR 2C 2C SW 01 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 2635 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 2630 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 25 CYGNET PL 01 1870 6TH AVE N 01 2905 DEER RUN TR 01 2900 DEER RUN TR 01 2855 SOMERSET LA 01 2350 SHADOWOOD DR 01 480 ORCHARD PK RD 01 2655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W lie lie UD 01 1025 TONKAWA RD 1C 1C 02C PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION95/07/07 OR 95/07/10 OR 95/07/10 OR 95/07/11 OR 95/07/14 OR 95/07/19 OR 95/07/26 OR 95/07/20 OR 95/07/14 OR 95/07/05 OR 95/07/21 OR 95/07/31 OR 95/07/03 OR 95/07/03 OR 95/07/24 OR 0071320071350071360071300714'007165 007188 007194 007148 007110 007172 007197 007114 007117 007177 95/07/26 OR-007145 95/07/25 OR-007170 95/07/12 OR 95/07/12 OR 95/07/12 OR 95/07/14 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/25 OR 95/07/27 OR 007076 007077 007078 007150 007167 007179 007180 007101 007182 007183 007191 95/07/21 OR-007171 39296767VOGT FRED & CO BLACKSTONE 4,000.0024-' 1200 STEINKRAUS PLBG INC 12.900 0024871061DOODY MECHANICAL INC JUNDT 17-000 0024422618SULLIVAN BOB PLBG GROBE lOM00.0024764861MONSON RANDY L CROTTEAU 300.00^9337200 CULLIGAN THIMMESCH V \j W B w w232 1618947600LAKESIDE PLBG & HTG INC ANDREA 10.500.00.-,090699 ROBERT WYLLIE PLUMBING HERNADUS mm w 0 mm mm m0 • mm mm 7.700.00♦409030 AMERICAN PLUMBING EIDEN w 0 w w w • mm mm 200 00-^5593522ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE CO GILLEN 200.0024'^18284 HOLZER PLBG & HTG 2-000 0025593522ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE CO 4b 0 WWW • W W 2-600 0025410203CUSTOM PLBG INC MARTINSON 583 0029337200CULLIGANGIBSON125.0025410203CUSTOM PLBG INC KRUEGER ■A mm • w w 1.000.0024730403DAY EARL W & SONS WROBLEWSKI 1,200.00 00000000 n n 00000000 CRESSY • u u .00 57237155CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC EIDEN 0057237155CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC EIDEN . 0057237155CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC EIDEN 0000000000FISHER. v w . 0051207393PATNODE BROTHERS HERNADUS . 0054791762HAYES EXCAVATING . 0054791762HAYES EXCAVATING • w w 0054791762HAYES EXCAVATING • w w . 0057237155CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC GRODER . 0057237155Cl.OVER HILL COMPANY INC ANDREWS . 0057237155CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC • \m mm .00 04721919 PROFESSIONAL SPRINKLER KISTING .00 2,020,446.16* 0102030405060708 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 99 9999 WORK TYPB CODE Residence Addition Garage/Attached Garage/Detached Porch Deck Fence Gazebo Pool Re-side Re-roof Tennis Court Sign Dock Shed Demo-Principal Structure Demo-Accessory Structure Hove Commercial Institutional Storm Damage Repair 1-100 Cubic Yards 101 Cubic Yards or More Undefined 2425262728293031 32 33 34 Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal LOCAL USE CODES Undefined IW. MMlUMBRICAL LISTING "BXMIT MBR ISSUED 4s10 PM JULY 1995CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY PAGE ISTARK7,000.00 El DEN .00 EIDEN .00El DEN .00KNAPP750,000.00 1,200.00 GIBSON 125.00 1,000.00JUNDT1,100.00 KRUEGER 1,000.00 2,000.00 VERSAILLES 300.00ISAACS4,500.00CROTTEAU15,000.00NIVIN1,600.00BLACKSTONE4,000.00ESKOLA2,000.00 FREDEEN 2,340.00 MCFADDEN 6,900.00 SMIEJA 15,000.00OLSON2.944.00 6.200.00 12,900.00BROWN2,376.00JUNDT6,000.00JUNDT17,000.00 GROBE 10,400.00FRANK12,800.00 275,000.00 CROTTEAU 300.00 SMIEJA .00 WROBLEWSKI 8,000.00 1,100.00 HEIDORM 1,000.00 .00 ALBERS 4,150.00 GILLEN 200.00 THIMMESCH 232.16 FISHER .00 GABRIELSON 1,000.00 EIDEN 20,000.00 WHITMAIJ 1,250.00 EIDEN 5,300.00 JUNDT 9,800.00 .00 HANSON 18,000.00 CASHMAN .00 1,100.00 GROBE 7,390.00 JUNDT .00 SERAN 136,000.00 ANDREA 10,500.00 STODDARD 1,000.00 HERNADUS .00 )R-0070<4)R-00707« »R-007077 )R-00707S JR-007107 )R-007113 )R-007114 )R-0071 IS «-007114 >R-007117 «-007118 >R-007119 JR-007120 JR-007121 )R-007122 )R-007123 JR-007124 }R-0(/7125 JR-007127 7R-007128 JR-007129 >R-007131 OR-007132 OR-007133 OR-007134 OR-007135 OR-007136 OR-007137 OR-007138 OR-007139 OR-007140 OR-007141 OR-007142 OR-007144 OR-007145 OR-00714S OR-007148 OR-007149 OR-007150 OR-007152 OR-007153 OR-007154 OR-007155 OR-007156 OR-007157 OR-007158 OR-0071S9 OR-007160 OR-007162 OR-007163 OR-007164 OR-007165 OR-007166 OR-007167 95/07/12 M 95/07/12 N 95/07/12 N 95/07/12 N 95/07/03 N 95/07/03 K 95/07/03 N 95/07/03 N 95/07/03 N 95/07/03 N 95/07/05 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/07 N 95/07/07 N 95/07/11 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/06 N 95/07/07 N 95/07/10 N 95/07/10 N 95/07/10 N 95/07/10 N 95/07/11 N 95/07/11 N 95/07/11 N 95/07/11 N 95/07/19 N 95/07/13 N 95/07/13 N 95/07/26 N 95/07/14 N 95/07/14 N 95/07/14 N 95/07/14 N 95/07/20 N 95/07/18 N 95/07/17 N 95/07/17 N 95/07/17 N 95/07/17 N 95/07/18 N 95/07/18 N 95/07/18 N 95/07/18 N 95/07/26 N 95/07/19 N 95/07/19 N 95/07/19 N 95/07/25 N 5752760 2635 2630 85 2630 225 2545 1420 2090 3445 3472 2675 2650 2010 4465 3405 1925 1170 4040 4360 3445 2875 1241 1400 1400 2350 1233 2775 2650 4040 630 4590 996 2060 4105 2860 1945 25 1115 2630 3620 2635 1400 2705 930 1725 2630 2350 1400 4099 2820 2605 1870 OXFORD RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W COUNTRYSIDE DR M COUNTRYSIDE DR W CRISTOFORI CIR COUNTRYSIDE DR W OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N KELLY AVB BRACKETTS POINT RD WEBBER HILLS RD SHORELINE DR LIVINGSTON AVE SILVER VIEW DR SILVER VIEW DR COLIN DR FOREST LAKE LANDING WATERTOWN RD COUNTRY CLUB RD LYMAN AVE WATERTOWN RD BAYSIDE RD SHORELINE DR DEER RUN TR BROWN RD S BRACKETTS POINT RD HRACKETTS POINT RD SHADOWOOD DR BRIAR ST COUNTRYSIDE DR W SILVER VIEW DR WATERTOWN RD PARK LA NORTH ARM DR W NORTH ARM DR GTH AVE N OAK ST DEER RUN TR EAGERNESS POINT RD CYGNET PL WILLOW DR S COUNTRYSIDE DR W EILEEN ST COUNTRYSIDE DR W BRACKETTS POINT RD WATERTOWN RD COX FARM RD BOHNS PT RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W SHADOWOOD DR BRACKETTS POINT RD HIGHWOOD RD DEER RUN TR KELLY AVE 6TH AVE N 30 1454045601 57237155 01 57237155 01 57237155 01 00000000 01 15590251 29 29337200 01 35595900 01 363325b! 29 25410203 07 24718284 11 00000000 15 15308479 09 15429000 02 39296767 29 39296767 02 39414211 06 00000000 06 18277636 04 14049022 06 00000000 01 34735282 01 24701208 11 14793838 01 34871061 01 24871061 01 24422618 24 18612461 01 15590251 01 24764861 17 00000000 29 14768403 01 36332561 02 35453797 13 00000000 11 18238046 02 25593522 01 29337200 01 00000000 06 00000000 29 15590251 24 39414211 01 34932477 02 34871061 16 00000000 06 00000000 16 14751160 01 15507609 01 34422417 17 17867711 01 00000000 01 28947600 02 35453797 01 54287393 SPORT COURTCLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC ElDEN CONSTRUCTION INC CULLIGAN MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO FIRESIDE CORNER CUSTOM PLBG INC HOL2ER PLBG & HTG DAHL STEVE CONST DALPHIN POOL 6 SPA VOGT FRED fc CO VOGT FRED 6 CO KLEVE HTG 6 AC KIT-DRY ENTERPRISES BROWNING CONST INC MINNETONKA REFRIGERATION STEINKRAUS PLBG INC GRAVELLE, STEPHEN DOODY MECHANICAL INC DOODY MECHANICAL INC SULLIVAN BOB PLBG NORDIC WINDOW CO ElDEN CONSTRUCTION INC MONSON RANDY L LUCAS DESIGN WORKS FIRESIDE CORNER M H SEIFERT CONST SELA ROOFING ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE CO CULLIGAN El DEN CONSTRUCTION INC KLEVE HTG k AC HEATING k COOLING TWO DOODY MECHANICAL INC TAYLOR KATHERINE TONY ElDEN CO LINDEMEIER SERVICES KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST LAKESIDE PLBG k HTG INC M H SEIFERT CONST PATNODE BROTHERS x'i'-UB/j£VIO 1, 1995, 4tl0 PM1JMBRICAL LISTING JULY 1995BKMIT MBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANYR>0071<8R-0071C9R-007170R-007171R-007172R-007173R-007174R-007175R-007175R-007177R-007178R-007179•R-007180*R-007181'R-007182)R-007183(R-007184 »R-007185 )R-007186 >R-007187 iR-007188 >R-007189 )R-007190 )R-007191 )R-007192 >R-007194 )R-007195 )R-007197 «2C 95/07/19 H 95/07/20 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/21 N 95/07/24 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 N 95/07/25 H 95/07/27 N 95/07/26 N 95/07/27 N 95/07/27 N 95/07/27 N 95/07/26 N 95/07/28 N 95/07/28 N 95/07/31 N 5753745575102532224620406430854485630344529052900285523504802820 890 2965 995 1870 2905 1261 2655 585 2735 740 2470 OXFORD RD 02TOGO RD 10OXFORD RD 11TONKAMA RD 01NORTH SHORE DR 19TONKAVIEW LA 01NORTH SHORE DR 04WATERTOWN RD 06BAYSIDE RD 06PARK LA 29SHORELINE DR 13DEER RUN TR 01DEER RUN TR 01SOMERSET LA 01SHADOWOOD DP 01ORCHARD PK RD 01DEER RUN TR 01FOREST ARMS LA 06 DEER RUN TR 01 WILDHURST TR 02 6TH AVB N 01 DEER RUN TR 09 ARBOR ST 01 COUNTRYSIDF. DR W 01 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 24 COUNTRYSIDE DR 01 BROWN RD N 11 CASCO POINT RD 24 3428282618871613182380468472191925593522363325611699313500000000147255472473840300000000547917625479176254791762572371555723715538940C0500000000 19340461 00000000 24690699 15429000 39296767 57237155 15468160 24409030 00000000 25410203 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS BUDGET EXTERIORS INC SELA ROOFING PROFESSIONAL SPRINKLER ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE CO FIRESIDE CORNER 1ST LANDMARK BUILDERSTAYLOR JIMday PARL M fc SONSHAYES EXCAVATING HAYES EXCAVATING HAYES EXCAVATING CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC BURNSVILLE HEATING CO PETER ANDREA CO ROBERT WYLLIE PLUMBING DALPHIN POOL 6 SPA VOGT FRED 6 CO CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO AMERICAN PLUMBING CUSTOM PLBG INC PAGE 2OWNER LAST NM VALUATION_ ^ A » »-- - - - - - - - - - - - - --500.00MACKEY10,086.00STARK17,000.00KISTING. 002,600.00BILLINSKI1,100.00JONES7,700.00SMIEJA6,000.00NELLS1,300.00WROBLEWSKI1,200.00CRESSY. 00 .00 .00 .00GROBER.00ANDREWS. 0013,000.00CLARK2,000.00470,000.00 LAVERE 60,000.00 HERNADUS 7,700.00 POAGE 16,000.00 PETERSON 2,000.00 .00 BERGGREN 3,470.00 El DEN 200.00 mabusth 11,000.00 MARTINSON 5B3•00 c ZONING PEPMITS ISSUED/FEES COIJECTEDREPORT HER. BPRMTISS-l DATE OF RUN 08/01/95 * PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO JULY 1993« * • t«PAGEj 1 REQUESTER! CAROLSPERMIT TYPE QTY . . . . . . CURRENT07/01/95 -BASE FEB RANGE . . . . .07/31/95VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY . . . . . . PREVIOUS07/01/94 -BASE FEB RANGE . . . . .07/31/94VALUATION PLAN RBVIBMUser DefinedSUBDIVISION 1 1,340.00 0.00 0.00 4 700.00 0.00 0.00VARIANCE71,300.00 0.00 0.00 6 1,200.00 0.00 0.00CUP4950.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 3 600.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 2 950.00 0.00 0.00 1 175.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 17*5,140.00*0.00*0.00*11*2,075.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total X7**5,140.00**0.00**0.00**11**2,075.00**0.00**0.00** A «. ■ 'VV.' rv V .5 REPORT NBR. BPEBRPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 08/01/95 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 07/01/95 TO 07/31/95 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 5,140.00 5,140.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 HC. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 5,140.00 5,140.00 * •« PAGE t 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE f ■.UTS ISSUED/FEES COLIECTED •>*YEAR-TO-DATEEPORT NBR. BPRMTISS*! ATE OP RUN 08/01/9S PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO i « * f •PAGEi 1 REQUESTER: CAROLEBRMIT TYPE uilding GL PAMILY-NEN UPLBX-NEIf P-ADD/RBMODEL F-ACC STRUCTURE rCMO/PRINCIPAL UM-ADD/REMODBL •EHO NST-ADD/RBHODiftL ;P*LAND ALT QTY 20 0 132 19 9 7 1 -- CURRENT RANGB - 01/01/9S - 07/31/95 •- PREVIOUS RAJJGB - 01/01/94 - 07/31/94BASE FEB 34.136.35 0.00 31.908.50 3.369.00 570.00 2,420.50 30.00 56.75 72.00 VALUATION 6.461.278.00 0.00 3.664.176.00 379.400.00 0.00 302.542.00 0.00 1,800.00 5.000.00 PLAN REVIEW 22.187 0 17.213 2.135 0 .28 .00 .35 .25 .00 111.15 0 36 46 .00 .89 .80 QTY 19 1 115 12 7 5 0 2 0 BASE FEB 25.380.00 15.00 16.167.50 1.223.50 410.00 477.00 0.00 762.50 0.00 VALUATION 5.689.720.00 500.00 1.756.690.80 106.300.00 0.00 37.300.00 0.00 90.340.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 16.497.06 0.00 8.175.43 738.73 0.00 81.90 0.00 281.13 0,00 »LAN REVIEW ONLY 1 0.00 550,000.00 1,423.18 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 )BMO-ACCESSORY 5 170.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 VCC/GARAGES *ub-total 7 1.194.50 75,225.00 762.70 13 1,607.00 175,620.00 1,184.95 203*73.927.60*11.519.421.00*43.916.60*175*46,072.50*7,856.470.80*26,959.20* techanlcal {BATING SYSTEMS 38 3.111.08 235,941.00 0.00 47 4,336.11 329,167.04 0.00 MR CONDITIONING 9 525.00 34,050.00 0.00 6 230.00 13,061.00 0.00 iOOD STOVE/FLUE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 151.25 10,200.00 0.00 TREPLACE 31 1.403.75 76.924.00 0.00 20 1,210.00 00,009.16 0.00 VENTILATION 1 35.00 1,200.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,150.00 0.00 •'UEL STORAGE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 2,000.00 0.00 ;AS line INSPECT 3 105.00 1,100.00 0.00 6 210.00 5,400.00 0.00 f)UCT WORK ONLY 8 280.00 7,065.00 0.00 3 132.50 7,000.00 0.00 REMOVE OIL TANK 5 175.00 5,450.00 0.00 7 245.00 5,400.00 0.00 UNDEFINED 1 247.50 19,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 .Sub-total 96*5,082.33*382,330.00*0.00*94*6,584.94*454,268.00*0.00* Plumbing FIXTURES 70 5.402.70 371,051.95 0.00 74 5.300.42 367,703.06 0.00 WATER METER 3 349.00 1.200.00 0.00 8 1,520.00 0.00 0.00 UNDEFINED 2 70.00 700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 .Sub-total 75»5.821.70* 373.751.95*0.00*02*6,900.42*367,703.06*0.00* Sewer k Water .SEWER CONNECTION 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 16 560.00 0.00 0.00 WATER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 210.00 0.00 0.00 NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 23 2.300.00 0.00 0.00 10 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 URNFLD «i/OR TANK 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 1 050.00 0.00 0.00 14 9,600.00 0.00 0.00 SEWER k WATER 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 3 210.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 29*3,390.00*0.00*0.00*51*11,730.00*0.00*0.00* Sign PERMANENT/POSTED 2 70.00 1,500.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 PER./FREE STANDG 1 35.00 400.00 0.00 1 39.00 1,200.00 0.00 TEMPORARY 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 2 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 .Sub-total 5*165.00*1,900.00*0.00*5*169.00*1,200.00*0.00* Fire FIREWORKS 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 oo•o ISSUED/FEES COLLBCTCDBPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 ate op ROM O0/O1/95BRMIT TYPE ub-total ser Defined AMD ALTERATION REE REMOVAL BTAINING MALLS .AWN SPRINKLER ^ub'total •.rand-total QTY3* 11 4 1 4 20* 431** Permit issued reportCITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 07/31/95BASE FEE 150.00* 550.00 120.00 100.00 140.00 940.00* VALUATION0.00* 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 90,276.71** 12,280,402.95** 43,916.68** QTY0* 5 2 1 9 17* YEAR-TO-DATE 424 t * PAGE: 2REQUESTER: CAROLS-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 07/31/94BASE FEB 0.00*300 €0 35 315 710 00 00 00 00 00* 72,156.06** VALUATION0.00*0 0 1,500 0 1,500 00 00 00 00 00* ,601,142.66** PLAN REVIEW 0.00«0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00* 26,959.20** • ♦ • PBFMITS ISSUED/FEES COLXECTED j .A 1 YEAR-TTV-DA'PE REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 08/01/95 DPrnpT t * * *♦PAGE: CITY OF FROM 01/01/95 ORONO TO 07/31/95 REQUESTER: CAROLE BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER k WATER USER SIGN FIRE BASE PEE 73,927.60 5,802.33 5,021.70 3,390.00 940.00 165.00 150.00 PLAN REVIEW 43,916.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 5,494.34 193.56 192.21 14.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 3,323.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN 05.60 38.35 1.50 PERMIT TOTAL 120,361.62 6,161.49 6,052.34 3,504.00 978.50 165.00 150.00 #.,.V .nmiTS ISSI^/FIES CCU/XTEDtBPOIlT WBR. BPWJTI8S-1 )AT8 OP RUH 08/01/95 ***•• PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 07/31/95dUMIT tYPBJmmr Dafinedi 3imDZVISX0MVARIAMCBCOPIKBTCH PLAN ;ariamcb /cup\PPBALiub-total OTY933i1374157*57**Irand* total BASE FEE4.715.006.900.002.825.001.400.001.525.00 100.0017,565.00*17,565.00**VALUATION PLAN REVIEW0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00*0.00**00 00 00 00 00 0.00 0.00*0.00**year-to-date PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLEQTY1032924057*.. PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 07/31/94BASE FEB8.375.006.275.001.425.00400.00600.00 0.0017,075.00*17,075.00**VALUATION0000000000000000000,00*0.00**PLAN RBVIBM0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00*0.00** .r- . *•.• « REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 08/01/95 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE PEE 17,565.00 17,565.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 17,565.00 17,565.00 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 07/31/95 * . « . *PAGE; 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 1^95 lECAP Of COiTUCT CmESJanuary fabruary March June August Septeafear October WovwAxr Oacwbar TTD Totalsrian ievlaw tnspactiona Ratainar TOTALNo. Plan lavlfw No. inspection*Minnetonka loadi Rian RaviaM Inapactiona Retainer TOTAL No. Rian Raviaiw No. Inaoactions 0.(»)225.00 25.00250.00 015 5,L16.77 2,016.97 210.00 75.0025.00 25.005.651.77 2,116.97 8 6 U 5 0.00180.0025.00205.00 012 2.027.67 6,563.8590.00 195.0025.00 25.002.142.67 4,763.853 0.076 15 227.18 255.0025.00507.18 217 Q.OO 135.00 25.00 160.1K} 0 9 1.075.43 45.00 25.00 1.145.43 1 3 143.35 105.00 25.00 273.35 3 7 32.20 45.00 25.00 102.20 1 3 816.56 75.M 25.00 916.56 4 5 210.92 4,525.71 135.00 25.00 570.92 0.02 9 120.00 25.00 4,670.71 0.02 8 2.590.i2 14,232.44 1,060.00 175.00 15,637.U 19.07 826.804.17 660.00 175.00 7.639.17 9.04 44 “^2,576.61 f’ 1.' ITEM 4.A Public Hearing; Meeting: LAKE HIIINETOIIKA COMSERVATIOH DICTRICT Orono's Request Objecting to LMCD’s 1996 Adopted Budget 7 P.M., Wednesday, July 26, 1995 Tonka Bay City Hall, Tonka Bay Members Present: Douglas Babcock, Spring Park; Joseph Zwak, Greenwood; Gene Partyka, Minnetrista; Dua... . Markus, Wayzata; James Grathwol . Excelsior; Tom Reese, Mound; Ross McGlasson, Tonka Bay; Craig Mol let, Victoria; Administrative Technician Greg Nybeck, Executive Director Alan Hi11cutt Vice-Chair Babcock convened the public hearing at 7:00 P.M. He provided background on the 1996 budget noting it was adopted by the Board on 6/28/95 and submitted to the 14 LMCD cities before the required 7/1/95 deadline. He added the City of Orono requested a public hearing to express objections to this adopted budget. He opened the public hearing for discussion from the audience. Ron Moorse, City Administrator of Orono, addressed concerns related to the reserve fund balances and the need to determine sufficient levels. He identified three purposes for reserve fund balances. They were il to provide sufficient working capital, 2) contingency for unforeseen expenses, and 3) to stabilize expenditures that may increase from year to year. He stressed these purposes need to be considered when determining the proper size of reserve fund balances. He summarized a conversation with Chairman Johnstone regarding the reserve fund balances. He noted Johnstone stated the Administrative reserve fund balances are necessary for unforeseen expenses, such as litigation. He added Johnstone stated the level of Milfoil reserve fund balances are needed because of the high volatility of expenditures from year to year. With the Equipment Acquisition reserve funds, Moorse projected a reserve fund balance of approximately $243,000. He suggested a replacement schedule identifying when equipment would be replaced and the costs involved. His final comment was that the 1996 budget does not identify expenditures in the "Save the Lake" budget. Babcock responded that "Save the Lake" funds are raised solely by private donations. He noted they are no*’ raised from taxpayer revenue and cannot be used for operating revenue. Reese concurred with Johnstone's comment regarding the volatility of the milfoil program. He noted that in bad growth years, there are substantial increases in the budgets. He added the $25,000 from the DNR is a volatile source of income. Gabriel Jabbour, a member of the Orono City Council, expressed concerns with the adopted 1996 LMCD budget and how it achieves targeted reserve fund levels. He reminded the Board that the LMCD decided to harvest so. POBLtC REARING, 1996 ADOPTED LMCD BUDGET, 7/26/95, P. 2 navigable channels rather than clear-cutting, thus, reducing the expenditures of harvesting milfoil. He distributed a memo that addressed cash flow issues. He reconvnended the LMCD utilize the financial exoertise in the cities, but noted the LMCD has not done He suggested*the LMCD should not require reserve funds similar to cities. He provided examples of differences between the organizations. He noted the focus of the LMCD is very narrow and well defined. He disagreed with the Boards contention that contributed "Save the Lake funds are not taxpayers money. He added that these are not tax- deductible funds and further investigation needs to be done to determine whether the LMCD qualifies as a 501(c)(3) organization. He noted the $39,000 of unrecognized investment loss in the 1994 audit. Jerry Rockvam, Mayor of Spring Park, concurred with Jabbour’s concern about the $39,000 unrecognized investment loss in 1994. He suggested this was irresponsible and that alternative means of financing need to be addressed. He suggested the LMCD invest the money in accounts that guarantee 110% on the investment. He stated the fund balances are on the increase, not decrease. He suggested examining alternative ways of continuing current operations. He suggested examining the mil foil harvesting program and investigating the feasibility of contracting this with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). An additional suggestion was to investigate contracting administrative/dock inspections with the 14 LMCD cities to provide the same service. Grathwol noted the Board of Directors maintained the LMCD is reducing the reserve fund balances to previously agreed upon Uvels. He^asked Rockvam why the Mayors feel the Board is not accomplishing this; Rockvam noted the figures he received were on the 12-31-94 year end audit. Babcock noted these figures are high at year end since a good portion of licensing fees are received before the beginning of the year. McGlasson questioned whether contracting milfoil harvesting with MCWD would work. He questioned Rockvam where he felt this would fall with the MCWD priorities? Rockvam stated he felt the priorities would not change, but the taxing base would increase. McGlasson expressed concerns about contracting dock inspections to the cities and how it would be financed. He expressed an interest in further investigation into this. Markus expressed a concern with current investments. Rockvam suggested a schedule of investments be distributed on a monthly basis. Vern Haug, Mayor of Tonka Bay, expressed concern with the current PUBLIC HEARING, 1996 ADOPTED LMCD BtJCGBT, 7/26/95, P. 3 investment policy. He felt that there has been some mismanagement with investments in the past. He recommended full 110% guarantee on all investment since this is taxpayers money. He questioned the hiring of the new executive director. He was concerned with the policy or hiring the new executive director at more than the ad»/ertised salary. He added the City of Tonka Bay inspects dock and marinas. Babcock noted that both the administrative budget and levies to the cities have been reduced the past three years. Howard Bennis, Mayor of Deephaven, questioned the amount of reserves. He felt the amount is excessive. Haug requested the Board provide information on how much money the LMCD has, where it is, what type of investments have been made, and the value of these investments. Babcock reminded the audience that the LMCD differs from the cities in that we do not have bonding capabilities. He added that depreciation is paid through cash, with the LMCD not having the ability to finance equipment. He suggested that if the targeted reserve funds are too high, they should be adjusted during a separate meeting. Zwak concurred suggesting further review by the Board on the length of reserve funds. Bob Gisvold, Mayor of Wayzata, agreed for further review on these target levels. He complimented the LMCD for the efforts in managing the lake, however, he noted the success is not related to the level of reserves. He encouraged the Board to spend the reserves down. Al Orsen, Wayzata City Manager, circulated a spread sheet on levies to the cities. He indicated the total levy is within the spirit of the enabling legislation, however, he questioned the 20% levy on Minnetonka. All interested parties having been given an opportunity to be heard, the Public Hearing was closed at 8:03 P.M. FINDINGS: * Representatives from the cities of Orono, Spring Park, Tonka Deephaven, and Wayzata expressed concerns with the 1996 adopted LM-D budget, specifically the reserve fund levels. Board reviewed that they had agreed upon a targeted 6 month reserve fund for administrative and 12 month reserve fund for milfoil operating expenses. * $35,000 will be transferred annually from the reserve funds to a milfoil equipment acquisition fund for depreciation. 1 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. Minnesota S5364-1M7 (612)472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 August 4, 1995 TO:AL ORSEN, CITY MANAGER, WAYZATA RON MOORSE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR. ORONO FROM:ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS COOPERATIVE POLICING INITIATIVE Enclosed is a summary drafted by Len Harrell, Police Chief, regarding the meeting held on July 21, 1995 with you and representatives of your police departments and other city officials. When the meeting ended, it was decided that Len would draft the minutes of the meeting and send those out to you so that you could share the information with your city council to see if there is any interest in moving forward on a cooperative venture amongst the three cities. I would ask that you do this as soon as possible and advise me of your city's interest in moving forward on this exciting project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Len Harrell, Police Chief ES:ls > ■ 11 pfint9<t on fecyci^ OJO^r t tnr>l f <^VlmF^.*%£i«TkAA#tM I f^ct ICF MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 LOiNAflRiLL Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Juh 21. 1995 TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager FROM: Lcn Harrell, Police Chief SUBJECT; Summar}' of meeting regarding cooperative policing initiative. Individuab present included Orsen, Cit>' \Ianager, Wa} zata: Dave Frishmaa. Finance Director, Wayzata; Chief Randy Christiansen. Wayzata; Ron Moorse, City Administrator. Orono; .Acting Chief Gai>' Cheswick, Orono; Ed Shukle, City Manager, .Moiaid; and Chief Len HarrelL Mound. The meeting was called by Ed Shukle and Ron Moorse to discuss the issue of the feasibiiitv^ of consolidating pohcc services for the cities of Mound, Orono. and Wayzata. The "Lake .Area Managers" have been e.xploring the possibilities for coaSk)lidating services for cities in our area and it was felt that there may be a unique opportunity at this time to look at joint venture. Ort>no ha.s recently had their chief leave and Wayzata anticipates the retirement of Chief Christiansen in December of this vear.m Ed Shukle began the discussion with a brief history of the "Lake Area Managers’* group and Ron Moorse e.xplained that they had an intern who would be compiling some financial information regarding the current costs for maintaining separate police agencies in the Lake Minnetonka area. Mr. Moorse explained that this mav ’ be an opportune time in our area with the changes that have occurred and changes that are emincnL Moorse stated that the managers' group is "off the ground", but has moved slowly. Moorse hopes to have some hard data from the intern within the next couple of months. Mr. Orsen stated that there reall>' had been no in-depth thought given to the subject at hand. Orsen felt that the issue of local control could be a stumbling block. Orsen stated that a meeting was alreadv ’ planned with Orono’s .Mayor and administration to discuss the topic of police service. Orsen stated that Wayzata has an issue with their current facility in terms of the need for remodeling. Orsen was concerned about communities maintaining their own idcntitv% but could see that the timing may be critical to the future of sharing services. Orsen stated that he would be more supportive of a “joint powers" arrangement versus a contract for services. .Acting Chief Cheswick was concerned with the personnel issues. 'Hie blending of contracts, seniority issues, and the role ol individuals within the organization. Cheswick is veiy supportive of the concept, but perceives that there will be a variety ol personnel issues to overcome. There was the concern expressed regarding the perception of downsizing and loss of jobs that could cause- resistance. .Any downsizing would be done through attntion. ■ Mr. Ffishfiua (fiscuiied the need for a task anah^ in order to compare community needs and to ifiirdier exfriore civilianizatkxv privatization. Frisfaman felt that dtere woidd need to be dramatic savings before city councils would be wiOing to relinquish the local control Chief Christiansen concurred with a major obstacle being the local control issue and community tity. ChiisdaniQ has been around for o\er 20 years and has seen these issues surface in the past Chief Harrell discussed hb current invoivcmcnl in a Ph.D. program and a willingness to incorporate die consolidation effort into his program of education. Harrell is willing to do background research on other joint powers agencies and consolidation efforts around the country. The tmplenieiit^ion of a merg er or consolidation process could be the subject of his dissertation if that is die direction that the communities decide they want to go. There was some brief discussion on poMibilities for transitional people from individual agencies to a joint powers agency. The dtscusskin then briefly' tried to identity possible areas of current duplication with die three agencies. The areas mentioned for further dbeu^ion were: clerical investigation information sy stems (3) vehicles facilities community' service otBccrs pobce reserves. Areas identified that would possibly benefit from one joint powers agency: Information systems .\nimal control Community Service functions Vehicles required Facility requirement.s Public access to servicc&'extended office hours Canine Training Drug Ta.sk Force affiliation Command Structure Cov erage Issues Transport issues Consistent Policy manuals Contract & bargaining issues. There was group discussion regarding the need to utilize officers in specific areas for community identity needs and public relations. Each community maintains individual identity and has input and representation through a pobce commission or governing board. The issue was discussed regarding the possibility of maintaining individual departments with an administrative head overseeing the three agencies. This would need furthcTr examination. K. ► ► i. DncosaiQii about settbig some kind of t^fine for re\Se^’ and researching the possibilities of a joint venhoe was also held. Information regarding the ciarent budgets and posonnel were shared fc? the three agencks. \fouiul S 900,000 12 officers 1 sccretaiy’1.3 CSO 7 Reserves Wayzata 500,000 8 officers 1 secretaty i. 9 eSc 4 Reserves Orofto 1,200,000 17 officcra 2.5 secretarial ,sc^a 9 Reserves !\igr. Orsen requested that minutes be prepared from this meeting and felt that our <fi$cus$ion should be shared with indi\i<hial councils and mayors to determine the interest and feastbilit\^ in pursuing diese discusston any further. .AO agreed that this should be the ne.xt step before any further discussions. 1 INFORMATION ITEMS '*! Budget Overview Update Police Officer Union Contract Negotiations Update Brliminary proposal to tte City of Wayzata Regarding Cooperative Provision of Police Services Update Regarding Health Concerns Related to the Nehring Property at 1972 Shady wood Road National Night Out Wcstonka Public Schools Memo dated 8/4/95 Re: Community Center Task Force Meeting Thursday. August 10. 10;00 a m. Board Rtwm Community Center 1H 12 Corridor Study Policy Committee Meeting Notice & Agenda Finance Staff Memo 8/10/95 Update on Information Systems Proposals for the Use of the Grace Baptist Church Property at 2380 ShaJywoixl Road TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Adminisifalor August 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Budget Overview Update The attached tables show changes in fund balances, tax levy and txx capacity rate to reflect direction provided by the Council at the July 26 budget work session. The first table. General Fund Changes In Fund Balance, shows increases in several designated uses of the General Fund Reserve. The designation for HACA reduction has been increased from $50,000 to $100,000. A new designation for potential police contract revenue reduction has been added in the amount of $100,000. The designation for working capital has been increased from $850,000 to $925,i:i:» In addition, $50,000 of General Fund Reserves have been transferred to the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund for the development of a storm water management plan. Also, $50,000 of reserves from the General Fund have been transferred to the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund for storm drainage projects. The redesignation and transfer of General Fund Reserves has reduced the amount of un-designated General Fund Reserves from $365,883 to $37,383. The second table shows changes in the fund balance of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. The fund balance has been increased through a tax levy of $40,000 and a transfer of $100,000 from the General Fund Reserves. The $40,000 tax levy along with a $50,000 transfer from the General Fund have been designated for infrastructure (storm drainage projects). An additional $50,000 transfer from the General Fund Reserve has been designated for the storm water management plan. Table #3. Citv of Orono Tax Levies, shows the net tax levy increasing by $64,670 or 3.21% for 1996.’ This reflects the initiation of a 2% or $40,000 levy to address long term fiscal issues, primarily infrastruemre. Table #4 shows that the 3.21 % tax levy increase, in combination with the increase in tax capacity (valuation of propeny) of over $1 million or 8.39%, results in a reduction in the city’s tax capacity rate of 2.78%. Table ttS shows that the proposed tax levy and tax capacity rate result in a 4.9% reduction in taxes on residential property. City of 0 r 0 n 0 General Fund Changes in Fund Balance Revenues Actual Budget Actual 1994 $3,283,595 3,152.666 Estimated 1995 $3,245,015 3,245,015 Estimated 1996 $3,329,070 3,329,070 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues $130,929 $0 $0 Expenditures Actual $3,102,595 $3,230,240 $3,329,070 Budget 3,152,666 3.245.015 3,329,070 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures {$50.07_1J ($14J75)$0 Transfers To P 1 R Fund: For Storm Water Managmenl Plan $0 so $50,000 For Storm Sewer Projects 0 0 50,000 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Exenditures and Transfers Out $181,000 $14,775 ($100,000) Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 1,249,558 1,430,558 1,445,333 Fund Balance - End of Year 11,13P jl 558 $1,445^333 SJ,315,333 Fund Balance Components Reserved tor Prepaid Items $34,502 $39,450 $39,450 Reserved for Advances to Other Funds 10,043 0 0 Designated for Vested Vacation and Severance Benefits 137,421 140,000 143.500 Designated for H A C A Reduction 50,000 50,000 100,000 Designated for Contract Revenue Reduction 0 0 100,000 Designated for Working Capital 850.000 850,000 925,000 Undesignated 348,592 365,883 37.383 Total Fund Balance $1,430,558 $1,445,333 $1,345,333 lZ3r34'«en(dbal Table 1 City of Orono Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR) Changes in Fund Balarx:e Revenues Property taxes Special assessments Interest on investments Miscellaneous Total Revenue Expenditures Professional services Total Expenditures Transfers In From General Fund For storm water managment plan For infrastructure (storm drainage projects) Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Fund Balance Beginning of Year Fund Balance End of Year Fund Balance Components Designated for: Infrastructure (road/bridge) projects Infrastructure (storm drainage) projects Storm water managment plan Emergency contingencies Total Fund Balance Actual Estimated Estimated 1994 1995 1996 $230 $0 $40,000 17,768 13,380 11,940 26,750 27,985 30,250 16,284 0 0 61,032 41,365 82,190 37,467 0 0 ~'^467 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 50.000 $23,565 $41,365 $182,190 485,241 508,8^550,171 $508,806 $550,171 $732,361 $187,837 225,171 267,361 0 0 90,000 0 0 50,000 320,969 325,000 (a) 325,000 (a) $508,806 $550,171 ^$732,361.^ The City established the road/bridge account in 1987 with resolution #2210 The funds to establish this account came from interest earned on MSA construction monies which were not then needed for MSA projects. Expenditures from the account are restricted to road and bridge projects, as approved by Council. The City established the emergency contingency account with resolution #941, and amended with resolution #2669 in 1989. The account is restricted for use in a cataSirophic situation or for temporary funding in the form of short-term loans to other accounts or funds and is to be repaid with interest within 24 months. The General Fund and/or the various operating funds of the City are to provide funding of $30,000 annually unless other action is approved by the Council. Each loan is to be approved in advance by resolution. NOTE! It is assumed that the emergency contingency account will be considered fully funded at the $325,000 level. Table 2 CITY OF ORONO TAX LEVIESACTUAL 1995 vs PROPOSED 1996TAX LEVIES TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE 1995 i996 ►3 tr (0 GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE (PIR) SEWER & WATER BONOS 1982 1985 1989 1992 BUILDING BONDS-HRA TOTALS INCREASE PERCENT (DECREASE) CHANGE $1,647,940 0 5,500 42,945 80,000 18,000 221,785 $2,016,170 $1,647,940 40.000 4,500 46.000 90.000 24.000 228,400 $2,080,040—^—- -1— 40.000 (1.000) 3,055 10.000 6,000 6,615 $64,670 0.00% 0.00% -18.18% 7.11% 12.50% 33.33% 2.98% 3.21% THE TAX LEVIES ARE SHOWN AS REDUCED BY HACA AID FROM THE STATE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN REDUCED BY FISCAL DISPARITIES CREDIT. Tax Levy Net of HACA Stale Paid HACA Total Tax Levy IncI HACA (ax95v96 07/31/95 1995 $2,016,170 305,975 $2,322,145 1996 $2,080,840 289,979 $2,370,819 INCREASE PERCENT (DECREASE) CHANGE $64,670 (15,996) $40,674 3.21% -5.23% 2.10% •*. - * CITYOFORONO TAX CAPAaiTY. LOCAL LEVY AND TAX CAPACITY RATES ACTUAL 1995 ESTIMATED 1996 1996 OVER (UNDER) 1995 AMOUNT PERCENT TAX CAPACITY Real Estate Persona! Property Deduct Tax Increments Deduct Contrib Fiscal Disp Net Tax Capacity (to calc rate) LOCAL LEVY Gross Levy Deduct HACA TOTAL LEVY NET OF HACA Deduct Fiscal Disparities Net Local Levy TAX CAPACITY RATES General Revenue PIR Infrastructure Debt Service HRA Building Bonds Total Local Tax Capacity Rale $12,780,145 $13,845,899 $1,065,754 8,34% 194,020 195,000 980 0.51% 0 0 0 0.00% (319,388)(324,685)(5.297)1.66% $12,654,777 $13,716,214 $1,061,437 8.39% mm mm mm mm m s s s s s s : $2,322,145 $2,370,819 $48,674 2.10% (305.975)(289.979)15,996 - 5.23% $2,016,170 $2,080,840 $64,670 3.21% (48,933)(45,000)3.933 -8.04% $1,967,237 $2,035,840 $68,603 3.49% =========ss = = = =r = == ========== 12.753%12.015%-0.738%-5.79% 0.000%0.292%0.292%0.00% 1.134%1.199%0.065%5.76% 1.717%1.665%-0.052%-3.02% 15.604%14.843%-0.433%-2.78%IIItIIIIII11IIII11MW WW M mm It11IIItII11IIIIS SS = = = TAX CAPACITY - The real estate and personal property tax capacity amounts are reduced by any tax increments and the contribution amount to the fiscal disparities to arrive at the total value of tax capacity used for calculating the tax capacity rate. LOCAL LE'/Y — The amount of gross tax is reduced by the state P3id HACA (Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid) and by the Fiscal Disoarities distributed through the county. TAX CAPACITY RATE - The net local levy amount is divided by the tax capacity to arrive at a percentage or tax capacity rate. taxbates 07/31/95 Table 4 I i • •• »CrrYOFORONO EFFECT OF BUDGET ON HOMES 1996 Est Market Value Tax Capacity (Net) Tax Capacity Rate Net Tax III (Deaease) from 1995 (Deaease) % from 1995 $100,' $1,280 14,843% $189.99 ($9.75) -4.9% • •I$200,1 $3,280 14.843% $486.84 ($24.97) -4.9% IIIS300,i $5,280 14.843% $783.69 ($40.20) -4.9% Tax capacity (net) = 1 % of first $72,000 mkt value, plus 2 % of all value over $72,000 TAXRATES 07/31/95 Table 5 •* %To: From: Date: Subject; Mavof and Cil' Council •0 * Ron Moorse, City Adminisiraior August 10, 1995 Police Officer Union Contract Negotiations Update After a very prolonged negotiation period, the Union steward and Union business agent have agreed on'a two-year settlement package for the years 1995 and 1996 which ihe> can recommend to the* membership for approval. The proposal must still be ratitied by the membership and then must be authorized by the City- Council. The issues addressed m the settlement package arc as follows; 1. 3. 4. 5. Wages. Health insurance contribution. Court time standby pay. Corporal differential pay. Part-time officer pay. An explanation of the proposed settlement package is as follows: 1. 2. 3. Wages. Wages are proposed to increase 2.75% in 1995 and 2.85% in 2 75% increase in 1995 is in line with the increase provided to the City’s non union staff. The average 1995 wage increase for police officers in the metro area is 3%. There are very' few 1996 settlements at this time. It appears the 1996 settlements will be between 2.75% and 3%. Health insurance. The Citv ’s health insurance contribution is proposed to increase by $10.00 per month in 1995 (from $291.00 per month to $301.00 per month), and to increase from $10.00 - $15.00 per month in 1996. The 1995 increase is in line with the increase provided to the non-Union staff. The City s health insurance contribution has been increasing at the rate of $20.00 per mondi in recent years due to substantial increases in insurance premiums. However, m 1995 two of the three insurance carriers did not increase their premiums. One carrier increased premiums appro.ximately $30.00 per month. The proposal holds the 1996 increase to the $10.00 increase but allows for a $15.00 increase if rates increase more significantly. The City has generally covered 50% of the average insurance premium increase. Court time standby pay. The timing of court appearances by police officers involves substantial uncertainty because of uncontrollable variables such the length of jury trials and the potential for working out a plea arrangement. This uncertainty many times requires that an officer be placed on a standby stanis for iPoficc Officer Union Contract Negotiations Update August 10, 1995 Page 2 up to several hours prior to a court appearance. This avoids the otticer having to sit in the court room for several hours, but ensures the otticer is available to respond to court when the case gets to trial. When an officer appears in court outside of a regular shift, the officer receives two hours of pay at the ovenime rate. This pay generally provides compensation for any standby related to the trial. At times, after being on standby for several hours, the trial is cancelled cither for rescheduling or because a plea arrangement has been worked out. In these cases, the officer does not appear for trial, and so docs not receive the overtime pay. Therefore, the officer receives no compensation for the standby time. The settlement proposal provides one hour of pay as compensation for this standby time. 4. 5. Corporal differential pay. The corporal differential pay is proposed to be 2.75% of regular pay in 1995*and 3% of regular pay in 1996. This is equivalent to $97.00 per month or $.56 per hour in 1995 and $106.00 per month or $.61 per hour in 1996. The corporals ser\e as shift leaders to prov ide direction and advice to the officers as well as taking on numerous special projects. There are very few departments who have corporal positions that Orono can use as comparisons concerning the corporal pay ditterential. Howev'er, departments do have pay differentials for a number of special duties. These differentials generally range from $100.00 per month to $125.00 per month. Part-Time Officer Pay. The City ’s part-time police officers have been paid according to the pay schedule in ihe City s non-union compensation plan since the City began using pan-time officers in approximately 1990. This pay schedule is applicable as long as the officers work less than 14 hours per week as their normal work schedule. This pay schedule is shown as Item #3 on the attached proposal of police officer pay schedules dated January 31. 1995. If the part-time officer normal work schedule is greater than 14 hours per week, they become members of the police officer bargaining unit and their pay and benefits become subject to negotiation with the Union. Rackiiroupd Concerning the Part-Time Officer Pay Issue In 1993. due to a prolonged absence by a full-time officer for health reasons and increased e.xpectations regarding p.nrol presence by the contract cities, one ot the part-time officers worked well beyond the 14 hours per week normal schedule. The Union took the position that because the officer worked more than 14 hours per week he was eligible for pay and benefits set out for the full time officers in the police officer contract. The City took the position '.hat the police contract does not include language regarding part-time officer pay and benefits, so that tlie Police Officer Union Cooinct Negotiations Update August 10, 1995 Page 3 City’s part-tiinc pay schedule was applicable. This issue was resolved through the binding arbitration process. The arbitrator ruled that for all hours worked beyond 728 (14 hours per week times 52 weeks) the officer should be paid a full time officer rate as iraiicaied in the contract. Because the arbitrator’s ruling did not meet the desires of either the Citv’ or the Union, and to avoid future disagreements regarding this issue, the City and Union have negotiated a part-time pay schedule that is proposed to be made part of the police officer contract. The Union’s Kev Concern Regarding Part-Time Officet^ay The Union docs not want a situation where the City uses part-time officers to simply replace full-time officers with a part-time officer at a significantly lower pay rate. The City has indicated the main purpose of the part-time officers is to fill in gaps in the schedule when full-time officers are on sick leave or vacation so that the City does not have to pay other full-time officers at an overtime rate to fill these gaps. This ’ "*nefits Nith the City and the officers. The City' is able to pay less to fill out ' schedule and the officers have more flexibility in taking time off. The negotiations v, * on the number of hours per week at which a part time officer should be a part-time rate vs. the full-time rate. The two ends of this continuum were • » m dispute. If the officer works less than 14 hours per week, the pay rate is determined by the City and is set out in the non-union compensation plan. If the officer works a full-time schedule the officer will be paid according to the police officer contract for full-time officers. It was agreed that if the part-time officer works 35 hours per week or more, the officer would receive pay according to the full-time officer contract. The remaining issue was what the level of pay should be if the officers worked a schedule greater than 14 hours per week but less than 35 hours per week. To resolve this issue, a new schedule was developed that added two steps to the City’s current part-time pay schedule. This schedule is set out and explained as Item #2 on the attached proposal regarding police officer pay schedules. The work schedules of the part-time officers will be reviewed each three months to determine the applicable pay schedule. This proposed pay schedule provides the City with flexibility to use part-time officers more than 14 hours per week but less than 35 hours per week without paying them at the full-time officer rate. The increase in the part-time pay schedule is significantly tempered by the fact that the part-time officers are only eligible for the top two steps when they are working a schedule greater than 14 hours per week. 3. PROPOSAL . POLICE OmCER PAY SCHEDULES 0-31*95) 3 WAGE SCHEDULES FOR POLICE OFFICERS 1. Full-time work schedule Pay schedule per current contract Pan-time schedule greater than 14 hours/week (Proposed for 1995) Step .1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step_l Step 6 SI 1.22/hr $11.88 $12.54 $13.19 $13.87 $14.60 .Movemem through the steps will be based on each 1040 hours of work until Step 4 is reached; then each 2080 hours for Step 5 and 6. ’ r ‘..-Lt’Jr ,“.s, fX"." fomWered a member of the bargainini umi). The pay schedule for whose schedule remains at less than i' hours per week u. shown ,n number 3 below. Part-time schedule less than 14 hours/week Pay schedule is determined by the City. The 1995 pay schedule is as follows: Step 2 Step 3_ Step 4Step 1 $11.22 $11.88 $12.54 $13.19 TO: FKOM: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Couocilmcmbers Ron Moorsc, City Administrator August 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Preliminary Proposal to the Cit>' of Wayzata Regarding Cooperative Provision of Police Services On August 1st Mayor Callahan and I met with the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Wayzata to discuss several issues, one of which was the potential for cooperative provision of police services. At that meeting, it w’as indicated that the Wayzata City Council had scheduled a work session for August lOth to discuss the concept of cooperative provision of police services. The Wayzata Mayor suggested that it would be helpful to the City Council, in its consideration of this concept, to have some preliminary information regarding how a cooperative arrangement might work and potential cost savings. In response to the Mayor s suggestion, the attached letter was provided to the City ot Wayzata tor the August 10th work session. . it WltT CITY of ORONO Munkipttl Ottici August 9, 1995 Stmt Udrtss: 2750 Keiley Partwif Crs^a. Wt 55353 Riallisg littnss: P 0. 3oi 66 Crystit Biy. MN 55323-0065 Allan Orsen, City Manager City of Wayzata 600 E. Rice Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391-1799 Dear M^p<H3frsen: \s YOU know the City Managers and City Administrators of the Lake Mtnnetonka Area have been discussing opportunities for cooperative service provision tor several years. One area of coouerative service provision that has been made a high pnonty is police services. It is > uLersunding the citie^s of Wayzata and Orono have had discussions regarding jomt police services going back to the 1960s. At a recent meeting you indicated you were planning to discuss the general topic of tlw coouerative provision of police services with the city council. It was suggested that it would be helphil to provide the Council with preliminary intbmiation regarding the benel its «' service provision in terms of cost savings and ser\ ice improvements to assist the Council consideration of the issue. This letter is to provide that prelimmar>' inlormation. ^rretir^mTn^^f'L Wavzata Police Chief and the resignation of the Orono Police Chief nrovide^e two cities with a unique and somewhat rare opportunity to reevaluate how each is organized for the provision of police sers ices; especially in terms of investigating the cooperative provision of poliL services. The key cnterion for determining the potential for cooperative provision of police services is that it would provide significant benefits to both cities in terms Tf cost savings and improved services. The Citv of Orono is very interested m working wi^ ^he Otv of Wavzata to determme if a plan and arrangement for the cooperative provision of police Services can be developed that will reduce costs and improve services, while preserv'ing and enhancing the best aspects of both police departments. fnr rof^perative Service Provision ^ There are several models for cooperative provision of police services. One is the rnntractual provision of police services by one city to another. A second is a joint powers nm ”ement similar to iku South Lake Public Safety Department. Both of these models require substantial effon to integrate multiple existing departments into one department. A third Telephone (60 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Allan Orscn, City Manager City of Wayzata August 9, 1995 page 2 i. ^ui^,T,c ,-if mine 10 formallv inteerate existing alternative that avoids man>' ot the proble ^ mana^^ement scnices contract, the departments is a management services arrangement. administrative support, and facilities City of Orono could provide the management, o Police Officers would remain the for the Wayzata Police Department: while the Wavzata Police uiiu employees of the City of Wayzata. Arlvamages of \f.-^nagement Services Contract The management services alternative has several a \an 1.I, would enable die City of Wayzata to maintain the current method and statf.ng of patrol services. It can provide signtficant cost savings wh.le retaining current patrol operations, scheduling, and services. It can prov.de an oppominitv for Uie City of Wayzam to “ j®'™ arrangeLn. for police services without the disruption ot a total department. merger. There is die potential of a wider cooperative police services arrangement that TOuld include^dditional cities. A smdy coordinated by the ^e Area City Administrators is currently underway to investigate this ^ managements services contract would preserve the City ot Wayzata s opti regaJIL moving back to managing tts own poltee another alternative based on the results of the smdy and me City o y experience with the City of Orono. the Wayzata police officers would f'™'" 1 ,,I the Citv o‘f Wavzata and could continue to provide police services to the City o employees „,,rr'entlv do The Citv- of Orono would provide the management services to :r;^on^h: under thr'ma„ageme„t services contract the City of Orono would he responsible for the following: 1. PHn ind suoervise effective police department operations. (Tlie current Wayzata PoUce SeXnt worn retain ftrst Lei supervisory responsibility over the Wavzata Police Officers.) Provide overall leadership and oversight. I f Allan Orscn, City Manager City of Wayzata August 9, 1995 page 3 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Conduct performance evaluations. Develop and implement long-term and short-term goals for effective services. Develop and implement effective procedures and practices. 6. Formulate sound budget programs Oversee prompt and thorough investigation of crimes. Provide emergency preparedness suppon services (in conjunction with other emergency services such as the Wayzata Fire Department). Provide e.xcellent customer service through office support staff. Provide for the management and operation of an effective Police Records System. Coordinate the Police Reserve program, and the Community Service (CSO) program. Coordinate the maintenance, purchase, and sale of squad cars and related equipment. Coordinate irainmg for the officers, and maintain training records. Provide firearms training. Supervise office support staff .Administer all purchasing. Provide facilities including; b. omet support space including space for the computerized Police Records Svstem and for hard copy files. c. Holding cells. d. Locker room. e. Fuel storage, fuel pumping system and fuel records. f. Police squad parking and statf parking, o. Facilities for the investigator and CSO. Allan Orscn, City Manager City of Wayzata August 9, 1995 page 4 The only items to be left as the responsibility of the City of Wayzau are the following: 1. Sworn officer compensation-related items such as; wages, benetits, and workers compensation insurance. 2. Police Officer contract negotiation and administration. 3. Maintain a small -substation’ at Wayrau City Hall foi the Wayzata officers. Cnst Savings and Sgr\-icf» ImprovemenB _ ___. U^er the management services contact alternative, some areas ot cost savings and service improvements are obvious and direct, while others are not as cleiu and/or are mo intangible. The following is a conservative listmg of the types of benetits the two vain in terms of potential cost savings and potential serv ice improvements through a 1^“'"'^ «rviccs arrangement. This list is intended to provide a preliminary mdication to enable the City of Wavzata to determine whether the poieniial benefits warrant fimher consideration ot a joint anSnt for police services. If the City of Wayzata determines that ftinher comideration is warranted, more comprehensive and in depth discussions and analysis will be undertaken lo identify and more closely determine cost savings. Cost Savings f Annual) 1. 3. Savings related to the elimination of the Police Chief position Elimination of one CSO vehicle Elimination of one police records svstem including software, netware and hardware S64.000 S 2,000 S 4.000 $70,000 4.Free up the space currently used to house the police department operations to make it available for other space needs of the City of Wayzata. The value of this space is based on the current and e.xpected space needs of the city, and the cost of meeting those needs through other alternatives such as rental of office space or construction of new space. • • • • Allan Orscn, City Manager City of Wayzata August 9, 1995 page 5 Additional Benefits 1. 2. Improved coordination of investigative services. Potential provision of a school liaison officer program or DARE program i; schools serving Wayzata. 3. Availability of additional staff resources for emergency situations. Cooperative Service Provision E.xperience . The City of Orono has had many years of experience providmg contracted police services to three cities. We have found that communication and responsiveness are the keys to successful contractual relationships. We stand ready to work with the City of Wayzata to an arrangement for the cooperative provision of police services that provides substantial benetiis to both cities in terms of cost reductions and service improvements. Thank you tor your consideration. Sincerely. Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator '■'K 4 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbers Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Aueust 10. 1995 W' SUBJECT: Update Regarding Health Concerns Related to the Nehring Property at 1972 Shiadywood Road In following up on the health concerns related to the property' at 1972 Shady wood Road, the County Health Department has become involved due to the presence of rodents on the property, and evidence of rodents on several properties near the Nehring property'. On August 9th staff met with the City Attorney, the County Attorney and the County Health Department staff to develop a plan for addressing the rodent problem. The County Health Department has ordered Mr. Nehring to cleanup his property, to cease all feeding ot ducks and other animals, and to hire a pest control sers ice to exterminate the rodents. Mr. Nehring has not at this point complied with the order. Neither has he allowed the County Health staff to enter his house to inspect it. The Orono Police Department has obtained a search warrant to enable the Health Department staff to enter the house for an inspection to determine the extent ot the rodent inlestation. On the basis of what is currently known and what will be discovered through the inspection, the County Health Depanment will arrange for a pest control firm to eliminate the rodents not only on the Nehring propeny but on the adjacent properties. The cost of this effort will be shared by the property owners' A letter will be sent to the propeny owners early the week of August 14th to advise them of the problem and to obtain their cooperation in allowing the County staff and pest control staff onto their propenies and in sharing the cost of the effort. An important pan of this effort is to ensure Mr. Nehring ceases to feed the ducks and other animals. This feeding provides food for the rats and would attract additional rats to the area. Orono’s City Attorney has suggested that the County is in the best position to take action to obtain a lecal remedy to force Mr. Nehring to cease his feeding of the ducks and other animals. August 11, 1995 Name Address Dear Citv officials of Orono and Spring Park are working with staff from the Hennenin Councv has a contract with Adams Pest Control for extermination of P«s« Counj norrv f'niintv Staff will be working with Adams Pest Control to identify the extent of the pr . m oSy develop a ™ to the rats, and to immediately begm the work. Hennepm Countv wm take responsibility for County property. It is the responsibility of each arrange with a pest control operator to eliminate any rodents on their own property. If you choose, we wTtSa^ge ev^^ation and Abatement procedures for your property and bill you for the cost. R-ite: must have water food, and shelter to survive. They transmit diseases, bite people, cat large Quantities of food, and damage property. Rats will eat almost anything ot nuintjonal value but prefer ^ • -inrt htah nrotein foods. To control rats we must keep all food and feed products store i manner which v^ill exclude them, such as a metal container with a tight fining cover. ^ also be stored and disposed of properly. Possible rat harborages such as old appliances wood a brush Diles and hich grass and weeds should be eliminated or checked frequently for signs ot Sfef gamees neat and off the tloor. Dog food should not be left in a dish fo a toe longer2n i2S for 'the dog to eat it. Rat traps and ban should be used very carefully, preferably by a professional pest control operator. It is important that we all work together to eliminate this serious problem. If yo““y q“«tions. or wStCoordinate the pest control efforts, please call Paul Sivanich at 930-2775. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse Citv Administrator RJM/lsv Date: To; From; Re: August 10, 1995 Ron Moorse Gary Cheswic)c.^;,.^jll^i^ National Night Out On Tuesday, August 1, 1995, the North Tonka Crxiiie Coalition in conjunction with the Orono Police Depeurtment, hosted the National Night Out Against Crime. The location was at Rick's Super Value at 3333 Shoreline Drive in Navarre. The event was highly successful with in excess of 300 people in attendance. Provided by local merchants were prizes, food and entertainment. WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPfNDENT SCHOOt. DISTFICT NO 2T! 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 viifhart G. Looby. Director of Communuv Education and Personnel Service 472-0341 Aueust 4, 1995 .' ' TO:Westonka Community Center Task Force Member^ FROM:Mike Looby, Co-chairperson Sue Peglow, Co-chairperson RE:CONLMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING THURSDAY, AUGUST 10 10:00 A.M. BOARD ROOM. COMMUNITY' CENTER The Community Center Survey has been completed and the results have just come in! A copy of the survey is enclosed for your review. I have not had an opportunity to review the data yet. but like you. I am eagerly anticipating the moment to read, learn, and discuss the preliminary results of frequencies tor each of the survey questions. I have been in re2ular contact with staff from our professional polling fum. Decision Resources, Inc. As we have planned, ne.xt Thursday we’ll review the preliminary report and discuss the findings with their representative. A formal presentation, including a more thorough e.xplanation ot the process and results, is scheduled for Monday''. September 1 1th. at 7:00 p.m. This topic will be presented by Bill Morris prior to our regularly scheduled 7:30 p.m. Board ot Education meeting. This would be a good meeting to invite others to attend such as city council members, city statf. community g.><!ization leaders, etc. As a Task Force member, 1 hope you will al.so be able to ‘ikiid this presentation. I’m sure our next meetine will 'oe extremely interesting and provide a considerable amount of d'lscussion. We will more than likely want to take some time to “digest ” the data as we review the findings, and then consider what action we should take in making a final recommendation to the Board of Education. Thanks for your continued support of the Community Center Task Force See vou Thursday! ?^2*-•J 7Z.• • • O^ciiioc Resources, Lrc. 3128 Dean Court Minneapolis, Minnesota 5541S vestonka cof^^jTjiTY C ents ? afS IDEIiTIAJ, SUR-/EY ‘July, 199f Of Decision Resources, Ltd., a sur*/eyHello, I’m research fifmTocated in mrx;;^oUr'^wrire''c^’? a?a®nr®L . ?*rk, Mound?‘independence‘ iS?«2 i with the wsstonka F’ubUc Schools and theJtou^ and Orono Hockey Associacicns to speak with a random samnle that*ai?*"*^H-iacing the area. i want to assure^u that all individual responses will be held strictly conf^denci^i• only sumries of the entire sample will be rwpor-ed ^PPtcxiinacQiy hov many years have you lived in this comtr.uni»»•’# Are you aware of discussions be tween t.-ie Cities of Minnecrises. Spring Park, Mound, Independence Orono, and the Hestonka Scncol ^^®trict about an area CortnuTiitv Center? IF •A’WARS, " ASX: 3. LESS THAN TWO YCARS_ _7% TWO TO FIv-B YEARS. .20% SIX TC TEN YEARS. . .21% ELSVSN TO TW3NTY Y£ARS2l% 21 TO jO YEARS. . . . .13| OVER THIRTY YEARS. . .18% DON’T know/refused. .0% AWARE................................ 3C% UTIAWARS........................ .69% DON'T XNOW/REFUSED. .* . .1% What have you heard about this project? (N«150) DON'T KNCW, 1*%; ONLY AEOCT A PROPOSAL 44% • PT’Trn sS tTBrS^^3% CElbL’R. 7%; 4. Are you generally favorable FAVCRABL2. . . . . . . .51% or unfavorable about the pro- UNFAVORABLE. 17% ject based upon wnat you have MIXED (VOL.)... . .17% heard or read? (N-15O) DCN-t KNOtf/REF'jsSD. ! 15% 5. Why CO you feel that way? ‘N-i50) NO A^JSWBR, 17%; GOOD 7CR KIVS, 13 %• NSEDFD 9'^%* m^yf inf =,^3”‘-ta .xe Tt^r. C^MKLT^.tY, 1.,%; SCATTERED. 2%. .Many citie.'i a.nd scr.col districts across c.ne .Metrooditan Ar«^ nave either built or are considering building'a community center. r-y --i-• j »• 6.1C local municipalities w»r« to Suild a conmun::ty center. what types of facilities do you thinX it is important to include? NO ANSWER/NCTHIN'G, 40%; £XERCISE, 2%; POOL. 22%; -SPA AtBiETISS, 3%; TEZS, 61; GYM, 9%; SENIOR, 4%; HOCKEY/ICE ARINA, 4%; THINGS FOR ALL AGES, 3%; SPORTS, 31; CLASSES, 3%. 7.Are there any particular activities or programs and services the center should offer to ser-ze t.he needs of residents in this area? (IP •YES,' ASK;) What are they? SCATTERED. 3% 8 Do you favcr or oppose the con- FAVOR/STRONGLf. . . . . .27% struct ion of a WestcnXa Area FAVCR. . . . . . . . 2 5% Ccatrtunity Center? (WAIT FOR RE- OPPOSE. . . li% SPONS8) And, do you feel atrongly OPPCSS/SZRCSSLY ....... 12% Chat way? DON'T KNOW/RSFUSED....25% I would iiJce to read you a list of facilities that could be included in an area ccmmur.ity center For each one, pieas» ^«11 cae if you would atro.ncly favor, sonewnat favor, somewhat ocpose. or strongly ocpose its i.nclusion. If you have no opiaicn ‘ iust say so. (ROTATEi ^ STF SM?3X0 STO .OKR 9.An i.idoor family fun leisure- type swi.Tcning pool?45»27%10%14%5% 10.A single large multi-purpose room with kitchen facilities suitable for receptions, meetings, parties and ocher rentals?341 31%14 V lei 9% 11.A gymnaeivutr?44%30%9%13%4% 12 .At. exercise and fitness center?42%30%11%14%4% 13 ..Racquetbal 1 courts?2 0%29%21%20%1C% 1'..An arts and crafts room frr class a.nd instructional programs'*37%37%Si 12%6% 15 .A senior citizens ce.ncer?47%31%9%8%5% t 4.Ail •ccivities center for school*aoed youth? 17. SitMill group nesting rooms? 1®. An indccr ice arena? 15.---------wwa.’cr* 4. C* area community center? 939 -?4 uji .?? • STF SM?SMO STC DKR 531 3C%7% 8% 51 24%42%lU 14% 9% 22%19%211 301 3% you would like to see in an «AtJ(JNG TRACK, 1%; DAYCAHE It. TS^CLOGY C«NT*R. 1%; CUTdCCR POOL. U CU^OR ?cr ARBNA. a; rSNNIS corars. 3%; BALLRiaJi li ?Hsi?Sp ..S>!JiTTES.ED, 41. if, iHSATEJ?, 4%; 20.-f a proposed comtT.;nity center contai.ned t.h© features you most favored, how much itore likely would you be to support its cor. Structicn -- quite a ict, seme, not too much, or not at ail? C^flTE A :^T......................... S'.-Mt.............................. _ .36% NOT TOO MUCH. . 7% not at all..........................i(i| CON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .5% houiehild°M.-n- SOmwT®;^KELY;.':'”'3Tj •^Ncw/RErcsEo;:;:‘!J Two options are .being conaidered for an area cormunir.y center. »01%TS OPTIONS ioSe «anSrS%orlrrf«?Siv'''^rd^ccP« ■WniiMl repaiiB and mai.ntenar.i» of Che cer*-er Airroor iw^cn of ^he 193<? portion of th» prnCemenJ J; Jhe M-«n- ec^cci-i™! r”'’* additlcne cr renov^^io^^w?^5 ce'^d^ T?e ■Bouid ccntinue ho eperate t."; Cent™ wit , services rerrai.ni.ng subsr.anr laily uncharged . ^^oqcans and tone option/The otner option] would be t.he demolit'on of rh*» current co.UTunity center and r*-e r'^r-a^>^at the same sit= l-lir t"?a -ACiUCy existina bond -efe-e-dSi dollars in would bi ;!t^reve.nue rJ?ser-?n?o5;h"^e^’''murtcipai bonds to finance -cns'ruc*--^®®aance of ctntai.t all current cortr.ur.lVY C€:i5l>« 5>ESX'^:E5 i.75 3-^-*ji 3ii •?? :::3? ^ cencer wculc also contain the School Cis^icc, Catrananity Education, SC?E. and Sceciai Sducat -n ao-elSlAt cjnild b# cperacad through a joint powers ^ccal runicipalities and the scncol dis- 22. Which option do you noet prefer -- (ROTATE) minlauil repair, code compliance, and downs!ring of the current CoBcnunity Center or con struction of a new Cotranunity Center? (WAIT FOR RESPCNS2) Do you feel strcngly t.hat way? If a new ccrunur.ity center buildmc were of nainicipal bends could require an inc coTstercial property taxes to cover tr.ei 23 .How much would you be willing to pay in additional property taxes to fund the construction of a ne<# Weston«a Ccramunity Center? '.START AT A RAl(DOMLy SELECTED PRICE LEVEL; Let’s say, would ycu be willing to pay $_ _per rrenth? (MD\»E UP OR DOWN* DEPENDING ON RE SPONSE j How shout 3 p<*r rtenth”^ (REPEAT) MINIM REFAIR/STRONGL/.22% MINIM REPAIR. . . . . .ict CONSTRUCT. . . . . . . . .if,\ CCNS7R-JCT/STRONGLY_ _32% NEITHER (VOL.). . . . . .9% BOTH EQUALLY (VCL.)....1% DON'T XNCW/RBPUSED....1G% constructed, the issuance raase in residen*‘ial and r cost and interest. NOTHING. . . . . . . . . .i5% 32.CO. . . . . . . . 4% 5»-oo. . . . . . . . . . .:i% 36.00 . . . . . . Ill SB.00. . . . . . . . .ii 310.00 . . . . . . . 91 $12.00. . . . . . . . . .,12% DON’T KNOW/refused_ _13% r«Ioving c.n. . , . 24 Would the charge of a fee tor a daily pass to use facilities such as the swinaning pcol. arte and crafts rooms, and health and fit ness cancer significant^/ decrease your use of the Comtunicy Ce.nter? /ES NO .24% 63%DON’T . . . . . 11% REFUSED. . . . . . .0% offering of individual T.embers.hips to ..ec.eationa 1 facility users. ^ 25. ity How ■Tiuch would you be wiliir.o to pay yearly for an individual * .Te.-nbersnip? START AT A RANDOMLY SELECTED PRICE LEVEL'- L«t' 3 say, would you be willing to cay C per /ear? (.yovE UP CR DCWN de^— PENDING ON response; How about $_ _ year? (REPEAT) nothing. . . . . . . .33% $5 0.00. . . . . . . . . .26% $100.00. . . . . . 1.5% $152.00. . . . . . . . . 7% $200.00. . . . . . . . . 3% $250.00. . . . . . . . . DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....13» ?39 *->? -*.‘3 ^Z '1^ iZi-i 2e.How much would you b« willing to pay yearly for a family riember- •lilp? (START AT A RANCCMLY SE- LECTID PRICE LEVEL) Let’s say, would you be willing to pay $ per year? (MOVE UP OR DOWN DB-~ PCOING CK RESPCNS3' How about _ per year? [REPEAT) NOTHING. . . . . . . . . .30% SlOO .00. . . . . . . . . .28% $200.00. . . . . . . . . .181 $30C .00. . . . . . . . . .6% $430.00. . . . . . . . . .2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED_ _16% ^ option call* tor ciiarcing a daily fee to non-nsirbers of the ccannunity center. This fee would offer liTated accessibilityrn rhA i 4 a*.. ^to the facility 27 How much »K>uld you be willing to pay for a daily fee to use the center? (START AT A .^ANDCMLY SE LECTED PRICE LEVEL) Let’s say, would you be willing to pay $ per day? (MOVE UP OR DOWN DE- PENDIira ON RESPONSE) How about $_ _ per day? (REPEAT) .NOTHING. .. . . . . . $1.00. . . . . . . . . .. . .4% $2.03. . . . . . . . . .14% $3.00. . . . . . . . . . $4.00. . . . . . . . . .. . 12% $5.00. . . . . . . . . .2JI DON’T KNOW/R3FDS EC... . .8% Thixi)clng about the current conmunity center facility. . . . 28. Do you have any ouggeetions for other uses of the existing facilities and the cocctiunicy center? NO ANSWER, 05%; RENT IT OUT, 2%; MEETING ROOMS, 1%; SCHCDLS/SDUCATION, 2%; TEAR DOWN. 1%; OFFICES, 1%; TEEN CENTER, 2%; THEATER, 2%; SCATTERED. 3%. New, just a few more questions tor demographic purpose.? Could you cell me now many peep-e zn each of the following aoe groups live in your housa.hold. . . . First, people 65 year? or older?0 1 -) F2% 11% .8% Adults, uncfer 65 years old and over 13 years old?0 ...............................................14% 1 ...............................................14% 2 .......... 57% 3 ......................................... .11% 4 OR I40KE ..................................4% 31. School-aged chiicren'r 1 2 3 55% 14% 18% . 6% 4 OR M3RE. .. . . . .31 MeiiUMifiWi 34. 3S. 32. fr«-school«c*? 33. D-«3 you rer.c or ovn yeur* pre»%nc r«sid«r.c9? Mh^t la ycur age, olease? (READ' CATEGORIES) Are you curre.ntly employed full time outiide of the hox.e? (Wait FOR RESPONSE) If applicable, is your spouse or partner currently enpicyed full-time outside of the home? 36. Gender (ay OBSERVATION: DO NOT ASF) 57. City or Region (7R0M LIST DO NOT ASK) 38. Sc.hcol District 05?-»>j ^3 *55 13:**^ 86% 2 OR MCFE. . . . . .__ _ _ _ _ OVU_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Q2I. RENT. . . . . . .17% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED.-c% 18-24. . . . . . . . . 25-34. . . . . . . . . . 35-44. . . . . . . . . 45-54 . . . . . . . . . 55-44... . . . . . . . OVER 63 YEARS OLD.....17% DON’T KNOW/REFUSED.- -0% YiS/YiS. . . . . . . . Y2S/NO... . . . . . . . NO/YES. . . . . . . . . •*0/NO. . . . . . . . ....14% YES/MOT APPLICABLE...,12% NO/NOT applicable.. REFUSED . . . . . . .. . . 1% MALE. . . . . . . . . .50% FEMALE. •.. . . . . . . .50% INDEPENDENCE. . . . . .MINNETRISTA. . . . . .. .20% MCUND. . . . . . . . ORCNO. . . . . . . . . SHOREWOOD. . . . . . .... 1% SPRING PARK. . . . . . IN. . . . . .. . . . . OUT. . . . . . . . . . TH 12 Corridor Study Policy Committee Meeting Notice & Agenda , ^ '\0 I. Project Schedule Update > EiS update ► Layouts ► Next Steps II. Upcoming Meetings ♦ Mediation III. Adjournment Meeting LocationOrono City Hall WED. August 16, 1995 5:30 p.m. L t Attencfees: Trunk Highway 12 Policy Committee Meeting Project Discussion Hay 17 5:30 Orono City Hall Ann C. Theis Vern Genzlinger J. Diann Goetten Val Reinaas Marv Johnson Brigid Thykeson Dick Harmon Dwight Poss Liz Olson Ken Neilson Medina Henn Co Orono HnDOT Independence MnDOT Wayzata Delano Long Lake Kandiyohi County Project Schedule Update - Val Draft version of the Farmlands, Wetlands, Forestry, Hazardous Waste, and Water Quality Sections were distributed. Graphics have not been completed at this time, will be coming in the future. Purpose and Need section of the Draft EIS has no comments. There are no comments at this time from Policy Committee members on other sections as well. There were some questions on impacts, difficulty of replacement by species and protection requirements for wetlands and minimum size for delineation, how wetland banking works and how wetland value is to be determined for mitigation and impact analysis. EIS Update Traffic Forecasts * Draft forecast doc’_ment is back. There are some comments that need to be addressed before the final report is completed. * Base year for traffic forecast will be 1995. Twenty year forecast will be 2015. Historical - Archeological Study * Phase I Report was delivered earlier this year. Minnesota Historical Society Reconnaissance Section has since gone out of business and there is some confusion as to how the study will be completed. MnDOT needs to meet with the State Historic Preservation Office to review comments and address adequacy of the Phase I report. Economic Study * Contract has started and is off to a quick start. Barton Aschman was consultant selected. This will eliminate rework for socio-economic data. * Several working papers have been submitted and are in m th« review process. The survey results that were collected by the University of Minnesota are providing some very useful and interesting data on the demographic character of the project study arr.a. * Cities have been provided with numbers for land acres by development type. Please review these numbers and provide response ASAP. Transportation System Management Plan There arc several issues that are still unresolved with regard to thiS alternative. * Watertown Road Connection * TH 12 thru Long Lake * Interchange at CR 6 and TH 12 * Delano? We have had a preliminary meeting. Need to meet again. * Maple Plain? We have had a preliminary discussion, need to get additional information. Mapping is in the works, some has been provided by consultant for Maple Plain but we still need elevation data to get much more detail. Layouts * We are about 50% complete with digitizing in the mapping. MnDOT will be getting aerial photography of the corridor again this spring. Large X's will be put down as target for the flights. * The aerial maps for the four lane proposals are complete. We will work on getting copies to the communities in the next few weeks. Next Steps - Val * MnDOT Metro will work with Delano to work through issue areas in Delano. We also need to get information about the RR bridge in Delano. Contact is Joe Mooney with BNRR. * Metro will be ineetirig with the Districts from outstate to discuss the issues surrounding che alternatives for the corridor. ... * MnDOT will be meeting with Maple Plain to identify issues. As soon as we have some substantive information a meeting will be set. Hennepin County and Independence will need to be involved in discussions regarding CSAH 19 and CSAH 29. Next Meetings * Mediation - May 30 3:00-5:00 Orono City Hall * Next Policy Meeting - July 19 5:30-7:00 Orono City Hall Comments and Questions Where do we stand financially? The project as a whole has no funding right now. The bigger the alternative and the higher cost alternatives will be harder to fund. Parts of the TSM are already funded through Henn County as part of their upgrade initiatives. (ie. CR 6 in independence) Bhat is improved on CR 6 west and south? “S. “f i„7ro"v...nt, that MnOOT supports. There are no additional improvements to this section proposed at this time. JUdjournment b'.-fik August 10, 1995 TO: FROM: RE: Ron Moorse Finance Staff Update o'l Infornation Systems On April 10, 1995 a recommendation was made to Council to establish an in-house information system that would ei^ance Orono's data processing capabilities, and provide a significant reduction in overall costs. Council directed staff to proceed with these changes with the proposed budget and timeline. The recommended plan involved the installation of a local area network (LAN), the purchase of financial software from Banyon Data Svstems, and to discontinue financial operations with LOGIS by the*end of 1995. In addition the recommended plan also included purchasing available software on the market for permitting and licensing, to allow us to discontinue those applications with LOGIS during 1996. The installation of the LAN has been completed, with individual workstations being added gradually to ensure a smooth transition. Financial software from Banyon has been installed and our payroll records will be transferred to the new system later this month. The new utility billing system should be active in September, with the remaining financial applications to be converted in October or November. Staff is currently evaluating several permitting and licensing software package'-. A preliminary study should be available in December. The recommended plan outlined »'udget of approximately $51,225, for the LAN. »nd financial soiLWure. The expenditures to date are $47,3951 Approximately $2,080 of budgeted expenditures will be allocated in the next ccuple of months to complete this portion of the p’- ject. The total projected costs are approximately $49,475, which is $1,750 under budget. Further updates will be provided as staff evaluates the permitting and licensing software, as well as other information systems. TO: FROM: DATE I Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator August 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Proposals Related to the Grace Baptist Church Site at 2380 Shadywood Road Staff has recently been approached by two parties regarding the use of the Grace Baptist Church site. One of the parties is Westonka Intervention which is requesting another opportunity to bring forward a proposal regarding an adult shelter use for the site. A letter from Westonka Intervention is attached. A second proposal is from John O’Sullivan and Irv Smith the owners of O Sullivans. They have purchased the former Martin ’s Service Station property on the comer of 15 and 19, and have a contingency offer on the church site. They have met with staff to discuss a proposed rezoning of the church property to B-4, office and professional office district, to allow an office building (20,000 to 30,000 square feet) that they suggested would house a bank and other professional office uses. On the existing B-1 site (former Martin ’s Service Station) they propose a restaurant use. The process for rezoning the church property from Lakeshore Residential to B-4 requires both a comprehensive plan amendment and a iczoning. The general process used for these types of applications is a conceptual/sketch plan review at the Planning Commission and the Council prior to a formal application being filed. Unless the Council wants to use a difterent process, staff will proceed with the sketch plan review process for the O’SulHvan/Smith proposal. August 5,1995 Orono City Council City of Orono Municipal OSice Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Dear Council Members- The decision to deny a zoning change for a Domestic Abuse Shelter has had sorne strong repercussions Our Board of Directors is receiving requests from community members, the media, and other public interests groups to continue our quest for a shelter. We are asking you to recommend the proper procedure in approaching Orono once again. We also realize that there are issues that need addressing. The approval of the shelter by your planning commission was unanimous. This was onlv after the commissioners had spent several months researching the need and appropriateness of a shelter in the Westonka area A week or so before the final Public hearing, we were aware of some opposition developing against the shelter We were quite willing to share information attending a neighborhood information meeting and meeting with business owners. It became clear that several of these people did not w-ant information. They had in mind to defeat the shelter without hearing the facts or presenting the truth We have heard from store owr.ers and neighbors of the Sojourner Shelter that ffiey were badgered by these people Unfortunately, fear tactics work. We saw a clear demonstration of this the evening of the public hearing when several unfounded and irrelevant statements were heard. t First to address the issue of need. Over the past 12 years, the Westonka Intervention Project has responded to an average of 150 families per year. Victims of domestic violence contact Intervention Project advocates by calling its 24-hour crisis line or by being referred by police and other social/health agencies. During the past 12 years, advocates have been unable to place even one \-ictim in anv of the metro area shelters because these shelters are always at full capacity. Sojourner and Home Free, ’he two nearest shelters to the Lake Minnetonka area which are located in Hopkins and Plymouth, respectively, turn away over 60% of the women who contact them due to lack of space. Combined, the two shelters are licensed to house a total of 43 women and children at any given time Westonka Intervention Project Volunteers estimate that at least 90% of the victims with whom they work need temporary shelter to remain safe Because domestic abuse is almost always kept secret within the household and that abusers attempt to socially isolate their victims, few victims have family or friends with whom they feel comfortable turning to when they decide to leave * In the Westonka Intervention Project's experie.nce, few women (only 5%) have the personal financial resources to move to a mote! or apartment. This has been true even for women from more affluent homes, primarily because their husbands have maintained control over the household's money Until the Lake Minnetonka community has its own shelter, the vast majority r r'-', p of victims, including the children, tvil) be forced by social end fi.-.encial circumstances to continue living with their batterers. The Wcstonka Interv ention Project estimates that they place well under 10% of the victims that need temporary shelter in hotels, motels and safe homes. There are several .actors why local hotels, motels, and safe homes are not an adequate alternative to an actual shelter. First of all, the majority of victims t.hat are coming directly from a violent situation co not feel comibrtable and safe being placed in a hotel, m.otel, or safe home. Persons in this type o situation need support from others; not to be placed alone in a hotcl/m.oxcl room or strainer's home. They need the counseling and assistance with the legal system that a shelter s st^can^ provide. They often have children and could make use of the play areas and kitchens that shelters ^ There are few hotels .motels and safe homes in the Lake MinnetorJea area and sometimes finding a place for viciim.s has been diffrcult. Transportation to and from a safe place becomes an issue and added cost when the victims to not have a car. Also, many of the wea s hoteL'motel managers have expressed concern over taking in victin« of domestic abuse. They fear that it could potentially hun their business. It becomes especially difficult to place victims of domestic abuse in local hotels/motels when the victims begin to sense that there presence is not very desired by the hotel/motel operators. Hotels, motels and safe homes simply cannotf rovide the services and feeling of safety that victims of a violent situation need A shelter will show victims of domestic abuse that the community is serious in helping them put an end to such violence. What impression does sticking these persons in a hotel/motcl give them about the communities willingness to help According to the experiences of other domestic interv'cntion services that have opened such shelters, the demand for use of domestic abuse shelters generally triples once the community becomes aware of the shelters services Oronc, Mound, and Minnetrista-St. Bonifacius police department reports indicate that between 1990 and 1993 the area they cover saw 10 6 domestic abuse repons per 1,000 population. The incidence of reported domestic assaults rose front 23 1 in 1990 to 260 in 1993, a 12 5% increase These numbers are by no means inclusive of all victims of domestic abuse. Other domestic abuse shelters report that a significa.nt proportion of t.he victims seeking their services do not make a report to the police The Westor.ka Intervention Project estimates that half of their requests for services come from persons whom have not contacted the police. The W'estonka Intervention Project estimates that between 450 and 600 women from the I ake Minnetonka area per year will ask for shelter and that they, like other women in the state, will Slav an average of 13-20 days each. Reports from other shelters indicate that the average fxmily group staying in a shelter, mace up of the parent and children, has an average of 2 to 3 members This data implies a demand for a domestic abuse shelter in the Lake Minnetonka area of 32 to 99 beds a year from residents of this area alone. Police reports indicate an average of approximately 1060 reports of domestic abuse a year for the Lake Minnetonka area. Some" concern over the use of the proposed shelter by inne.'-city dwellers has been expressed by a few citizens of Orono. Wc fee! that we have adequately shown that residents of the Lake Minnetonka area alone would easily fill the proposed shelter space year round. Even if at times, there was space not being used by residents of the area, this space would likely be filled bv residents of other western suburbs and communijies outside of the metropolitan area. There are no domestic abuse shelters in ail of Carve.'-. Scott, and Wright Counties, and many sections of these counties are closer to the proposed shelter site than is Minneapolis. The Wcstonka Intervention Project is in no way claiming that the shelter would never be used by persons from the cities, but they are establishing the fact that it is very improbable that this shelter would be overrun by persons who are not residents of the Lake Minnetonka area. So why if the demand is much greater than 20 beds does the proposed shelter only have 20 beds? The Westonka Intervention Projects answer is funding. The Westonka Intervention Projea feels that is has sufficient funding to support the proposed shelter, but that it docs not have the financial capability to support a substantially larger shelter at ffiis time. The proposed shelter is a feasible undertaJdng by the Westonka Intervention Project, and its a stan for domestic shelter service in the Lake MLnnetorJca area. Due to the fact that the Grace Baptist church sits on over tw o acres of land, the proposed site has tremendous expansion capabilities. The structure of the building itself is also very suitable for a future addition. The Westonka Intervention Project wants to purchase and renovate the church in Orono because it is located in the heart of the Lake Minnetorira community, includes two acres of land, and is in a neighborhood that ir.cludes residents as well as small retail shops. The building is on the main bus line serving tne western suburbs of Minneapolis which will enable many residents to continue to go to work, school, and other obligations without having to rely on staffer volunteers. The site is in walking distance to a supermarket, video rental .store, laundromats, dry cleaners, restaurants, and hair saloons The two acre site would provide enough room for a large playground area and a twelve car parking lot There is also plenty of parking available on the street and in a large public parking lot within one block We have found that much of the opposition to suburban dom.estic abuse shelters develops from misinformation. People opposed to this shelters have expressed concern regarding the use of the shelter by persons from the Lnner»city, which is associated with the concerns of an increased crim.e rate. The other largest concern has been w-ith a possible loss in property value for the residential areas adjacent to the proposed shelter site. Before we address the concerns mentioned in the preceding paragraph, we want to briefly respond to some unlbrtimaie opposition that has developed concerning the proposed shelter. We are aware that a few individuals are soliciting opposition on the basis of racial differences We feel that it is a disgrace to the Lake Minnetonka area communities that the use of this shelter by minorities is an issue for a few, but we do not believe that racism is by any means widespread throughout this area. Thus, we believe that the majority of the residents of this area understand that domestic abuse is not an issue of race or income. This type of violence knows no boundaries. The use of this shelter by persons of different races will be no different than ranging composition of this area. We fed that we have successfully established the fact that local dem.and for a domestic abuse shelter in the Lake NCnnctcrtka area alone exceeds the occupancy rate of the proposed shelter. We also re-mind the Council of the fact that Carver, Scott, and Wright Counties ncighbonng this area do not have even one shelter cf a similar purpose. We cannot imagine how this proposed shelter of twenty beds could be overrun with persons from the inner-cities. In response to the concern that such a shelter may increase the local crime rate, we have sufficient data that indicates that shelters of this kind have no affect on an areas crime rate According to individual police departments and the bureau of Criminal Apprehension, no community in Minnesota has ever experienced an increase in their crime rate due to the operation of a shelter for victims of domesrlc abuse. Also, there has never been an incidence of violence generated from a perpetrator of one of the victims at any shelter across the nation since the first of these types of shelters began. One of the main reasons that perpetrators do not appear at these shelters is because of the lav.*s established to crotect victims of domestic abuse. Another reason is because many abusers arc ashamed of their abusive behavior and are very hesitant of causing a disturbar.ee at a location where many other people are present In its eight years of e-xistence, the Sojourner shelter has not had any major security problcm.s, nor has it had to take any extra security precautions Staff from the Home Free shelter report that during the past fourteen years they have never had a major problem with an abuser trying to violate security or disturb the neighbors. In fact, their neighbors gave Home Free a vote of confidence a few years ago by saving they strongly prefer the shelter to any other group home. Staff at Alexandra House report that the only problems that they have had at their new facility have been with residents violating substance use rules. In these instances, local police were called immediately to help the staff remove the particular women from the premises. After researching the effect that such shelters have on neighboring property values, we resolved that such shelters do not have a lowering effect on property value. One of the members fro'T Westonka Interv’cntion Project's Board of Directors is an authority in real estate and at valuing propeny Through market analyses, he was able to show that there has been no incidents of a property value decrease, or even a lower than average increase over time, in Nfmneseta due to the presence of a shelter for domestic abuse. Westonka Intervention Project has the financial capability to support the proposed shelter. In fact, it is our opinion t.hat the Westonka Intervention Project is very financially secure and we feel uhat there should not be any budgetary problems that would arise in the future due to the operation of the proposed shelter. The Westonka Interv ention Project has demonstrated that they have realistically considered and thought through all the aspects of the proposed shelter including its cost. The shelter would be primarily funded by the .Vlinnesota Department of Corrections and the Minnesota Housing and Financing Agency. The next largest group of contributors to the Westonka Intervention Project's budget is made up of large Minnesota and Nation-wide foundations and corporations. Also, significant contributio.ns come from local businesses and individuals as well as from grants from municipalities. The Westonka Intervention Project is self-sufficient and should be viewed as any other business in Orono. The Westonka Intervention Project has the financial mea.ns to support this shelter and the Westonka Intervention Project is solely responsible for financing this project, not the City of Orono or it’s residents It is very important that community members support the shelter. We feel that we have the support of the majority of our rcsider.ts. this is why we are asking to come before the council, once again tor approval Valerie J. Hessburg, Executive Director