The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-24-1995 Council PacketAGENDA FX)R COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY. JLXY 24, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CAIX *1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Meeting of July 10, 1995 f PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION CO^DIENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3.#2005 Sailors World Marina and Boat Club. 1955 Shoreline Dnve - Conditional Use Permit 4 4.#2025 Michael Plank, 4115/4145 Watertown Road - Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement Resolution r. • • 4 5 #2026 New Horizon Child Care, 875 Wayzata Boulevard - Variances - Resolution 6 #2034 Mary & Gene Zu k, 1400 Cherry' Place - Variance - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 7.Volunteer Commission Appointments ENGCVEER REPORT 4(8.Pay Request #4 Brown Road/Watertown Road CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT Jt 9.Dog Regulation and Licensing Ordinance Amendment 10.Momtorium on Subdivision Applications Requesting Use of a Private Driveway to Ser\'e 3 or More Lots - Ordinance 11.Moratorium on Development in the North Highway 12 Area - Ordinance >^12. CDBG Agreements - Resolution 13.Pavinc of Rear yard of Public Works Garage Area CITY ATTOR iNEY ’S REPORT (*14.) LICENSES (*15.) BILLS THU •TiyiiWCil COMMISSION COUNCIL PUBLIC ATTENDANCE meeting date PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED bELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 3. 5. $. 7. 8. ^ // Cti/y\ Cy\ ^ \----- i.w L:x> r < SI [J______ '_______—1 j/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------—---------------------------------- Mi r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 10,1995 A ROLL C • ^'A r' < The Council met on the above date wth the follot^ing members present; Mayor ^d^vary Callahan, Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel J^bour, Charles Kelley, fst^ JoEllen Hurr, who arrived at 8; 10 p.m Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeunne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Nlichael Gaffron, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, who arrived at 7:30 pm, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p m. (»#1) CONSENT AGENDA Items #4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 19 were added to the Consent .Agenda. Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (•#2) REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 26, 1995 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 26, 1995 Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Susan Wilson had no comments PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Sand, a Smith had no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments ZONING ADMINIS1 RATOR’S REPORT (#3) «2005 SAILORS WORLD MARINA AND BOAT CLUB, 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. DeSantis was present MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (#3 - #2005 Sailors World - Continued) The application is for a conditional use permit to allow private boat club use for a membership up to the level of 100 members and has been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. The applicant has provided a table showing the use during pre, post, and busy seasons with regards to parking. \ early confirmation ot 25 otT*site parking stalls would be rc<juired. The marina presently has 41 stalls in use on site and -.0 off-site stalls for the peak times. 30 stalls arc available through an agreement at the An Center for the marina use. DeSantis reported this operation has been in etTect for the past three years and noted that the boat club provider the best use when there is limited parking available. 75 slips are rentable at the marina. Callahan said clarification was needed in the resolution regarding limitations on the boat club membership as this was not noted in the findings or conclusions, order, and conditions portion of the resolution. Kelley questioned approving this CUP without the landscape plan installed. The landscape plan submitted is fo»- screening of the storage facility The City has a letter of credit and a developers agreement for the landscape project. A pollution problem is in the process of being analyzed and cleaned up DeSantis reported geo-probes being conducted on three parking stall areas and the possibility of the need for monitoring wells. It is hoped that this problem will be - iared up before the end of the year. Ground water flow pollutior. from the nearby gas station might be affecting the marina property. Kelley said he was not opposed to the boat club use but noted that the ordinance w as originated to gain control over certain areas of operation. Smith said the Planning Commission asked for yearly certification in their recommendation. Kelley received confirmation that this would mean the license would not be issued if no certification is received regarding the parking stalls. Callahan was concerned with the marina relying on another commercial venture for their additional parking stalls Mabusth said the times of peak use for each facility complements each others' operation Callahan thought paragraph one of the resolution should be rewntten to speak to this issue Callahan told Moorse that land use was not a good way of regulating an activity. Callahan felt more control is needed over this and asked Staff to give concern and thought over this issue. Callahan moved. Kelley seconded, for application's resolution be rewritten to recognize the 100 member limit and the 25 alternate parking stalls. Ayes 3, Nays 0, Abstain 1, Jabbour Abstain. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (•#4) #2020 JAMES BRUCE, 265 LEAF STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3574 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to grant conceptual approv al of the vacation of the drainage easement within Lot 6 of the Stielows Addition and to dirert staff to prepare the necessary v'acation resolution at the time the final plat. Fox Hollow, is submitted for final plat apfMmval to the City Council. Ayes 4, Nays 0. Jabbour nmved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3574 approving the preliminary plu of Fox Hollow. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#5) #2021 JAMES BRUCE/JAMES HALE, 575 OXFORD ROAD AND 565 LEAF STREET - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3575 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3575. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) #2025 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 WATERTOWN ROAD- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3576 The original plat of Maple Place was approved in 1988 This application is for a realignment involving Lots 2 and 3 of that plat; both with a residence The Applicant proposed a private road with a cul-de-sac Originally, a 30' outlot driveway serving Lot 3 was proposed With the outlot/backlot standard requiring 15 W o of the area, the land was re-platted with a private road and the 150^/o will not be needed. Lot 1 can be replatted at a future time as it contains tl» dry buildable needed. The road can serve all three future lots. Callahan asked about the driveway/private road issue. Mabusth said the applicant has been forewarned concerning Lot i future division would require an upgrade Kelley moved. Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3576. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#7) #2029 WILLIAM F. SMITH, 2580 FOX STREET - PRELLMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3577 Mr. Smith was present. ftllNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (#7 - #2029 William Smith - Continued) A lot spHt was approv ed in 1986 At the time of that resolution, it was determined that any future division of Lot 1 would require legal access be provided to all three lots through a private road platted on the east side. There is no control over Lot 2 as it has another owner. Filling of wetlands and mitigation would be required if a road were to be created. This would also result in the removal of large evergreen trees Another option would be looking at a front lot/tack lot configuration with a 30' outlet on the east side This would have minimal impact on the wetlands A connecting driveway would have to be provided from the outlet to serve the northern lot This would involve encroachment of wetlands to get to the building envelope on the west side. Lot 2 must use the driveway for access. It was further noted that the area standards are met. Mabusth reported the Planning Commission felt there would be a negative impact on proposed Lot 2 if drive was to the east and a new’ drive encroaching the new lot for Lot 2. A curb cut on the west side was considered but code requirenients would make this difficult. It was felt this would conflict with the comprehensive plan The applicant has asked to use the existing easement driveway for all three lots. After taking in the fire department needs, the Planning Commission recommended widening of the drive from 10' to 12'. The drive was approved in 1986 at 12 ’ It was lurther recommended that the portion of the drive beyond the curb cut for Lot 2 be upgraded to a width of 18’ and an outlot be designated through Lot 2 to define the driveway. Planning Commissioner Sandra Smith said the application had been tabled to allow the applicant to contact the homeowners of Fox Run to inquire of use of their private road for access to the lots The homeowners have no interest in granting Smith access from their road. The City has no easement or recourse to make this option happen. Kelley noted the costs involved if the City were to initiate taking Fox Run and upgrading it to a 24 ’ paved road with a cul-de-sac to serve these lots. Kelley thought the City's opportunity to do this was in 198o. Callahan asked Mabusth what the 1986 resolution stated Mabusth said the resolution asked that all three lots would need legal access Callahan voiced the possibility ol requiring this and the need to live up to the rules established. Jabbour cited the City's own e.xample with the Melamed application He agreed with Callahan but thought the ordinance may be too rigid Jabbour did not believe the City would want to redivide the land and did not see the benefit. UK Kiftfriie »i»r»iYT«^ tliTTiT^ wnrtitiii^RIiT^r«Mira RFftRl roxira RIITiTi PTOlfTiTil •lOIi rtiYin nrcira smisssiiTiri rtis^ Minw Rimcf] MffHra \r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (#8> #2030 RICHARD LAVERE, 995 WILDHURST TRAIL - VARIANCES RESOLUTION #357S Nfr. LaVcie was present. Ma .usth reported on a 1992 application for a 20x31’ addition to the east side of the residence. A building permit was issue but the project was never completed. The present owner, LaVere, is asking to complete the project and add a lakeside deck. The deck would encroach 6’ into the average lakeshore setback. There is 28S s f of patio area existing under the proposed deck area. 90 s t. of walkway under a portion ot the deck was removed as part of the oriainal application. The applicant has reduced the deck 2- 1/r for new structural hardcover of 523 s f placed over 288 ’ of patio area. The detached garage was removed as part of the original application 210 s f ot hardcov er in landscape areas and street yard was removed. The Planning Commission recommended limiting the amount ot hardcover to 35.4% in the 75-250 ’ setback area. This is the amount of hardcov er that was thought to exist at that time. Calculations have been redone and hardcover updated to j6. 1% with the applicant's proposal at 35.9®/o. The ditference between the recommendation and the proposal is about 30 s f of hardcover. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3578 per the Planning Commission recommendation of 35.4% of hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#9) NORTH SHORE MARINA - CLUBHOUSE SEWER CONNECTION GafFron reported a sewer connection perm?* was issued 25 years ago for the clubhouse structure on this property. During a recent maintenance call, It was found, to the surprise of all, that the clubhouse was still connected to a septic system Staff recommends abandonment of the septic system and connection of the building to sewer via connection to the next building, and not to the main line, as there are many other utilities and pipes in this area which might be disturbed. Gaffron noted that non-structural repairs were approved last year after Council review, and this connection would add permanenc.- to the structure. Staff does recommend the connection. Council asked what the procedure is when sewer permits are granted. Galfron said today inspections are done to ensure the work is properly completed. He cannot speak for what the procedure was 25 years ago. A permit was granted 25 years ago for two buildings including the building that is currently the clubhouse. Because only one permit was granted listing two addresses. Staff feels this may have some bearing on why this building was not connected Staff recommends the other two buildings in this area ot the property be checked to ensure that they are connected t' sewer. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (#9 - North Shore Nfarina - Continued) Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to direct Staff to issue a phirabing permit for the clubhouse subject to the abandonment of the septic system Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Callahan repo*ted receiving a letter from a previous mayor of Orono, Marv Butler, concerning a use of the wood chipping machine owned by the City. Butler suggested a program of placing the machine at different locations throughout the City to enable citizens to dispose of brush from their properties. Callahan asked Gerhardson to look into this matter. The Council scheduled attendance at the upcoming neighborhood meetings regarding sewering. Jabbour and Kelley will attend the July 12 meeting at the Council chambers; July 20 4:30 p.m. meeting will be attended by Callahan, Goetten will attend the July 20 7;6 o p.m. meeting of the Orono Orchards neighborhood at Council ch^bers, Hurr will attend the July 27 7.00 p.m meeting, and Jabbour will attend the meeting on August 3. Gaffron will confirm with the Council the Bracketts Point neighborhood meeting Callahan asked for an update on the sewer connection at 7 10 Dickey Lake Drive. Moorse said the sewer is in and all costs are paid. The City is in the process of addressing concerns of the property owner related to the project. The sale of the Oberhauscr propc i/ vas noted. The Long Lake Com Days will be held August 11, 12, and 13. Callahan and Goetten will ride in the parade August 13 Hurt noted an agreement made by Mr. Dunn with the DNR over leasing of the Straley property Gaffron said the agreement requires approval from all agencies before a lease could be entered into Hurr was concerned that an option could hold up the sale of the propeny Jabbour said there was a possibility of one property being given up for another property sold Jabbour had believed that the property was to be presented for sale on the open market after the completion of two appraisals and possibly going through the ta.x forfeiture process. Goetten said Dunn had commented at the LMCD meeting that he was reorganizing his docks Commercial and residential use of the property was discussed. Hurr asked Mabusth about a developers proposal concerning redevelopment ot the property located between Lakeside and North Shore Marinas. Mabusth said the proposal was very preliminary and would ask for direction when and if a more detailed proposal is received. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1095 (Miyor/Coundl Rqx>rt • Continued) Kdley his viewpoint on commcraal developni«rt in the North Hwy 12 area in respofse to a memo suggesting interest in development by a discount retailer. It was suggetted ihat the Council review the Hwy 12 comprehensive plan amendment. Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, that a 6 month moratorium be placed on commercial devdopment in the area north of Hwy 12 between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Rc»d to County Road 6. Ayes 4, Nays 0. Goetten reminded Council members of the need for official representation at the Planning Commission meetings as well as at the Park Commission meetings. Council will receive a schedule dedgnating each members' duty as liaison. ENGINEER REPORT (•#10) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT - NAVARRE LIFT STATION NO. 7 RENOVATION Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Request for Payment for the Navarre Lift Station #7 Renovation in the sum of $5,394.29. Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (•#11) RESOLUTION #3579 CALLING FOR WILLOW DRIVE DHPROVEMENT Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3579. Ayes 4, N.:ys 0. (•#12) AWARD BID - WUXOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENT Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to award the bid for the Willow Drive Improvement Project to Buffalo Bituminous in the low bid amount of $131,982.50. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#13) PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD 15 - RESOLUTION #3580 Jabbour moved. Hurt seconded, to approve Resolution #3580 directing Hennepin County to prepare preliminary plans for County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road. Ayes 3, Nays 2, Goetten and Callahan Nay. (•#14) APPOINTMENT OF ACTING POLICE CHIEF Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to approve the appointment of Lt. Gary Cheswick as Acting Police Chief at a pay rate of $24.32 per hour effective June 15, 1995. Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8 r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm* COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 10,1995 (•#15) 1994 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT No action was required. (#16) SCHEDULE 1996 BUDGET WORK SESSION The 1996 Budaet Work Session is scheduled for July 25, 1995, at 8:00 a.m. (•#17) NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - PROCLAMATION #3581 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3581 proclaiming Tuesday, August 1, 1995. as "National Niglit Out" in the City of Orono Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#18) RETIREMENT - WAYNE QUAST Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to accept Wayne Qu;‘ ' i resignation in good standing effective July 28, 1995, and to approve payment ot accrued vacation and 1/3 ol unused sick leave in severance pay, as per City policy Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#19) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AT GOLF COURSE Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to approve the employment of Nathan Walker as a temporary counter helper at the Orono Golf Course for a period not to exceed six months effective June 30, 1995, at an hourly rate of $6 00 Ayes 4. Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Tom Barrett had no report (•#20) LICENSES Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded to approve the following license; Ayes 4, Nays 0, Septic Events Permit Long Lake Com Days Foot Race (•#21) BILLS Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, Nays 0 III! • ifsu< nil II li I im ni3 i I 1 %Ch «5»i I •«. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONLNG CODE SECTION 10.41, SUBDIV ISION 7 (A) FILE NO. 2005 WHEREAS, Gar>' DeSantis of Sailors World Marina and Yacht Club, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter the "applicant ') has an interest in the property located at 1955 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to permit a boat club use at 100 members per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2005. 2. 3. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District. The property consists of 31,217 s.f. On June 19, 1995 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: There are 41 parking stalls on site. In the past year, applicant has had to provide 8 stalls for a boat sales use. The only retail operation at the facility is a ship’s store that serves slip rental customers and boat club members. a. Page 1 of 4 4. 5. b.Applicant ’s analysis and comparison of parking needs tor annual slip rental or boat club uses suggests the element of flexibility makes it far easier to handle the limited parking facilities with a boat club operation. c.For the past three years, applicant has made arrangements for additional off-site parking on weekends to serve the needs of the marina. d.The City has received no complaints from aJiacent residents concerning parking problems within the immediate neighborhood. e.Applicant has operated a 50-55 member boat club for the past three years without any report of parking problems. The City Council finds that granting a conditi»'nal use permit to allow a boat club use at the marina will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor w ill its use depreciate surrounding property' values and that the proposed level of use of the property w ill be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repons by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A) to permit a boat club use with a maximum of 100 members at Sailors World Marina and Yacht Club, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon application for the annua* commercial marina license, applicant shall provide written confirmation that marina has 25 off-site parking stalls. Tlie City further reserves the right to reconsider this parking arrangement if the City staff finds or receives reports from residents of parking inadequacies at the marina or Page 2 of 4 ___ at an approved facility within the City ot Orono that provides the 25 off site parking stalls for the exclusive use of the marina on weekends from May through September. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation ot the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to tfio recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of July, 1995 ATTEST Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono.* a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf ot the City. Notar>' Public Page 3 of 4 I STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person!s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 4 of 4 „.-.c- =f N=r-.n line C=..encin= at ^ 'g ,c--. = l «v-end«*d Easter-j --^-oos '5 r.ir.u~es i.as«. -- ^-ae;*- 2^-0-4 feet:ex-enc- 4i cec.e.s *5 Minutes -asw thence Jcr —--s v. *^--,o-ce Scufr. ^nter^ec ..^cn point of 50 rr.inutes iv thence Morcn =? thence Hortn -< 'fV-Vnc Avenue extencec -o'-’v 42 decrees• ‘^ine cz G^-HC •-hence oou^n^^es--------- , ^ • p;or NoTwa - —^3 leet w.aeii'-- ^r-'^-'o-i.cnsr• o.-rv -•o'rNorth line iTfeet thence PARK" decrees 4 5 to becinninc ^T (hereinafter "the ninutes West 1. ^ County, .l-nnesc.-. Oil LAKE MlllMSTONK^ , - MM \ ^ M ^ rrc?erty ); an' request for COUNCa ACTION^y DAT^ July iO, 1995 Departmrat Approval: NaiM Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2025 Michael Plank. 4l 15/4145 Watertown Road - Vacation of a Drainage and Utility Easement - Resolution Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated July 10, 1995 for more background and detail on this vacation petition. The owner has decided to vacate the drainage and utility easement that still remains along the former division line within proposed Lot 1, refer to Exhibit E, rather than wait at the time of a future subdivision of Lot 1. The easement as it exists seiA’es no public purpose. Tl« Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the vacation petition. Drainage and utility easements will be dedicated along the newly defined lot line as shown on the plat of a lot line rearrangement. Exhibit E. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. \ --ifrxc----r- - r- A RESOLUTION VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1 OF THE PLAT OF MAPLE PLACE IN THE CITY OF ORONO. HENTSTPIN COUTSTY, MINTsESOTA FILE NO. 2025 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 1995, Michael R. Plank filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a 10’ wide drainage and utility easement originally dedicated in the plat of Maple Place and legally described as follows: Drainage and utility easements as dedicated in the plat of Maple Place lying 5’ on each side of the common lot line between Lots 2 and 3, BlcKk 1, Maple Place which bears North 62 degrees 24 minutes West for a distance of 441.99 feet, EXCEPT for that part lying within 5 feet on each side of the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2, said Block 1, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City’s Planning Commission on July 17, 1995 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommend unanimous approval of the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. Tlie drainage and utility easements as shown and dedicated in the original plat of Maple Place will no longer be located adjacent to a lot line as division line has been relocated on property. Paee 1 of 2 2.The drainage and utility easement as it exists ser\'cs no other public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV’ED, that the petition of Michael R. Plank is hereby granted by the Council of the Citv of Orono and that the drainage and utility easement legally described" above is hereby vacated. Granting of the petition is subject to applicant granting drainage and utility easements along newly defined lot division line widiin the plat of Maple Place Seconu Addition. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held on July 24, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Pace 2 of 2 4 P /. TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator iHOM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:July 10. 1995 pi SUBJECT: #2025 Michael Plank, 4115/4145 Watertown Road - Vacation of Drainage : Utility Easement - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.12 - Vacation of public easement. List of Exhibits A • Application B - Certificate of Mailing/Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Maple Place Plat E - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Currently under Consideration by City F - Legal Notice of Vacation Description of Request The applicant has decided to vacate the drainage and utility easement that intersects newiy defined Lot I of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. The drainage and utility easement in its current configuration serves no public purpose. In the replat of the lot line rearrangement new drainage and utility easements will be designated along the newly defined shared lot line. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the vacation application of Michael Plank involving the vacation of drainace and utility easements originally dedicated in the plat of Maple Place involving the properties located at 4115 and 4145 Watertown Road. This approval is conditioned on applicant grantin2 drainage and utility easements along the newly defined division line with the plat ot Maple Place Seconu Addition. ( cn?i)F dis^b - scBDiiiioN application n PROPERTY LOCATION Site address Propeny Ideetii-catton Nuoacr ,oj.;as; Please check one - Propcn>' Aruch legal descrirnon :o acpiicainn. APPLICANT r, .. f) Name ^Add;;sr^-5trCgk l5S^i^ City -------------------------- ________Phnnethome) "zip^j^^JPhone (work)_________ 0\\'N'ER (if diffcren: than applicant) Name Address Cirv Phone (home) Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size w • Z' r — .. ... V.* • - - -r € Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL rx - V- Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Othcr-(specif>’) _______ «... , » • • • A W to* -'i» '• •« wi /u'.n 7-* r ^ • \j». ••;uv .-'70 .... r u*u* r?w to u .'to to ... - * ______ — . tu. .1 W to to y Number of Building Sites Division for Tax Purposes ^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildlmg sites) p.„.. Subdivision for New Building Sites -7; Existing Units O New Units Total Units \ Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (cneck) Units perv^Luu pw.____Acres Sq. Ft. Dr>- Buildable Land Residential Odier (specify)__________ . •• Ns..■UN MTE 0S/17/WI' MTOI SOI .•*_____‘J* ’ *HUMEFTH COUNTY TflOPfllTY’XNTQIimTIQN SYSrCM■■OPftTY QNNUS LIST“.m ..1 :♦•';:«:i -li n tl-llS-XS 4S 0014< PiV aaoo' i toioc coistofcmi ci « .* oiom NAMI *'• M F « I KIUPF ..'TAXPmt NILLXAH F • EVELFH RNU»Pi> ‘rf •.k:- NMC/AOOII 4S00 lAYsiec noIU7U 7LAXN m sssso • •. 1 • *>• '♦.i * • « : • ' i .-* . • ■ .. ■ 0»tct NUC TAKFAYIR >. NMC/AOIMI SO il-no-tS 44 000£ ■ OOOSO AOORESS UNASSIGNCO STATE OF NI»OI STATE OF Him (ONRI (UiCE LINE TRAILI . t • , « ' « i k ** . * ’ N A • • • V ft • U •. r-I f' -1'" 'i:-'iStCR NAHl < ; .TAXPAYER • ^ ; NAME/AOOR # - • ■ 0 • 4.» • •i : • TOTAt rAICH • * 0# • •. 602 0QQ24 * •% ■!. I. • t •J! •• I • f ’.t s ; V-*- ‘ «. » *•’ • t^ • vVu'V- ’i •' ■ r • *»C **• »** ••*** 1 ' * • r » '.*vv . ‘ V • •• . *. J V' . I ;• • t .1 » :i; : -I ; **f 1 • • ■ k4 ’ • . . ’*4- •• •*k * » •. . ; \ y\t ‘, i ft t o- • t• • •ft 0 • r ' /\- • r i; -• k »I • I •. •» ^ : . ; I . « t. » r • * • i ' • » ; • ft .* • * ft • » f 0 ‘i . ..' -I i ;t •*, • »• .......... iv:- „ 7-.- • . ■ . / f-REPORT NO. PAGE PI4354Q1514300.BAYSi0E;R0 HAPLE PLAIN Ml 5S3S4SO Sl-llS-ES 4S OOlS OOOSO ASORfSS UNASSIGNEO N F A E KNAPP KILLIAN F:l EVELYN KNAPP;'•C•5*^ li: Tso S1-110>2S 44 OOOS N OOOSO ASORESS UNA£SIC»Cb HEMCPIN FORFEITCJ LANO.. HEMCPIN FORFEITED LANO FOR SALE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OM€R ONLY SO S1-118-2S 44 0001 00038 ADDREGS IA4ASSICNED STATE OF Him STATE OF MINN (ONRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL! v|| , *. i SO Sl-llO-23 44 0004 OOOSO CRISTOFORI CIR KEIKIRICK B HELROSE KENDRICK 8 MELROSE 50 CRISTOFORI CIR MAPLE PLAIN M( 55554 ■i 4 ■'K.'.1; tf<1 < sli; . A* . ft • 4 r? n*if■ .**•V'T I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE nCPRESENTAriON OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS or THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. i’ i DATE ft ffi BCfjdxK/) r* O'C OD 8^ ^ • iiL'MiTi 1 ■■ IM < ■* (k fH •i..Ml ft*TI unt/w MTOI IM . I ».•CPIN COMTT MCI>EITY XNPOmATlCN SYSTEH MOKITY OMCRS LISTmm/nsm 0MC« mm TiOVAVn / ' NMC/AOM ' OMCR NAME ;.TAXPAYER NAHi/AOOR I -Mt #• I n» AOOR ONNER HAMC TAXPAYER , NAHE/AOOR < . ' i;* •-'i -•«iA » • ? .*I ’ PROP AOOR QMNER NAHE TAXPAYER ’ NAHE/ADOR,V i. • f PROP ADDR . f QNNER NAME I I *1 V ♦ I •N- »*1* •. •* *: *» t . •» . »L M Sl«llA>n IS 0012 ORttt NATERTOM RO R AM J NYATT ROMRT J MYATT <«ttO NATERTOMN ROAD HAMJ RLAIN »M SSSSf Rf.lT Sl-lia-El AX 0001 NATERTCMI R0 T i I C H SHIEJA TmiAS n/tmisnm n shiejr 4040 NAnRT0M4 RD MAPU PLAIN m 55354 I 30 41 0005 04005 HATERTONN RO C r DUE i C L PAULSON CHRISTOPHER F DALE OERX L PAULSON 4005 NATERTCMI RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 •-* A. i.J. SO S1-U0-2S 42 0001 04245. CHIPPEHA LA R L SORtNSCr< ETAL ROOERT L SORENSEN 4245 CHIPPEHA LANE HAPU PLAIN M SS3S9 t' 0 I ' S f • • V 10 31-110-23 42 OOOS 00030 AODRESS UNASSIGNED HirtaFRED M BRYANT Hl^taFREO M BRYANT C/O MERLE STILES IBOl LAKEVIEN TER LONG LAKE MN 55356 TAXPAYER .NAME/ADDR 3B 31-116-23 42 0015 04360 CHIPPEHA LA L E MARTINEAU/J M MARTINEAU LARRY E I JEAN M MARTINEAU 4360 CHIPPEHA LA MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 r so 11-118-2S IS 0015 04225 HATIRTOM M JANES R PAOOQN JANES R PAOOOli ;4225 NATERTOM! RO HAPLE PLAIN m> SSSSf 1' *sa S1-110-2S 41 OOOS 04045 NATERTOM RD D S A 6 S RELLENBERGER DANA A GRfOORY KELLENOERGER 4045 NATERTOM RO HAPLE PLAIN M SSSSf r ■•i i: i V '• 38 31-118-23.41 0008 04145 WATERT0M4 RO M R I M E PLANK SALLY PLAIOC 327 NORTH CARRINGTON BUFFAL0>HY .82634 •;*■I 38 31-118-23 42 0002 04265 CHIPPEHA LA T J A K L MCCAFFREY THOMAS J MCCAFFREY 4265 CHIPPEHA LA MAPLE PLAIN HM .' 55359 HV i* *.* • w38 31-118-23 42 0006 00038. ADDRESS UNASSIQNED STATE OF MINN \ STATE OF Him fONR) f I LUCE LINE TRAIL! 1.38 31-118-23 43 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGT4ED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN (ONR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL! t • i 'vr,- :* ; I li REPORT NO. PI4354Q1PAGE 4■'i•1. t *so 11-110-23 14 000704100 HATERTQHN 00' * t■'V:FRANK KQKESH ET ALFRANK KOKESHr4100 HATERTONN RO . !;• HAPIE PLAIN MN SSSSf 38 31-118-23 41 0004 04105 HATERTOitI RO D GIGUERE I A GIGUERE PATtlALEE MARIE SAHCHUK 4105 HATERTOIfl RD MAPLE PLAIN M4 55359 n. T v;38 31-118-23 41 0011V . 04115 HATERTOitl RO MICHAEL R A MARY E PLAM((( J4:• MICHAEL PLANK f*. 327 NORTH CARRINGT(»I 8UFFAL0\||f 62834 38 31-118-23 42 0003 04355 CHIPPEWA LA FREDERICK E SHEMANEK JR ETAL FRED E SHEMANEK RT 2 BOX 16 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 t \ i 38 31-118-23 42 0012 04220 CHIPPEHA LA PAMELA GAIL ANDERSON PAMELA G ANDERSON 4220 CHIPPEHA LANE MAPLE PLAINS MN 55359 I • 38 31-118-23 43 0011 00145 TURNHAH RO DEAL SAVINGS BANC DAVID A DETERS 145 TURfiHAM RD MAPLE PLAIN Ml 55359 ‘ y • -VMAPLE PLACEi^; ?.-f/,*t-j'Jr;f4’,r.‘Sf*.;'> mmfiim* «l ««« •«i9<i«««l •» ■•• M •mt t*«.«u«4 •• •! |« - Al •v*r%|«l ».«M( \ OUT LOT , A ^ —1] ■•*ik •! r««i •k#i»*f * ^ ^il«« »••««••• H»« <4 f «•• |»lt 9t I •••MM «l M /*«■ f'AJr •/fik !•••• •* *••••••»• • r •••M m lit If!'- ■•* ^ r *• J 0 ^ r, ^ •*•••• ••»#«►••• i <r ^ riTj'. ’!••• •»•r.ik •!•« • •••■•M at >.■•#•»• «■•••> • I H / • ^ 8 . « •t 1 it' W [r_}> :\V'Av % iff' " Ail ! |»M* **•« •* ••••*••*••.•*••• •« ••••••••> •«••<•• 1tt"M !• 4«uu>l • I*0t <*t «».<»•••• •.••••• •! 'Ml**#* >t ti»4 • l*« It •tm ft ./ V/ » 'r '■>0 0-; 'N'-' ^0^ r' 0'.-"’ ’ • g*11 ti’»•ft 11 m -w w m m «♦.«» ' 'w « m m m m a PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MICHAEL PLANK IN LOTS 2 & 3. BLOCK X & OUTLOT A MAPLE PUCE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOA COFHN & GRONRFRr. IMP Coihiiltinif E»,v/iiivf5, Ijwii Smxym, Site PImmen 482 Tjmjrjck Avenuo • Lon); Lake, MN 55356 612-473^141 ~ , •’ , ...3 )) 1,. Ih,r,Klh..llhKMiru> Jb> nu-.wumlirim dit«lMiprf. .mil th.il I jm ,i dull n>;isii fid Ciiil tiigiiuTf .md Und Sutvrvm undrf IIm* I.IU ^ lit llu Sl.iU' of MaiK S CrtHilvf); I m um* \umK i \27^^ •r crn’ OF orono - notice TT k Planning Commission will hold a public hearing m the for a vacation of a drainage and utUity easement involvmg the properues located at 4115 and 4145 Waicnown Road and legally described as follows: s.'sn.T.'S ;sv“—;s i'Sf. common lot line between Lots 1 and 2, said Block 1. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appomtmcni. City of Orono By: Planning Commission (> / /Lr*y>T^________________ _____________ . . JeaimeXMabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the weeks of July 3 and July 10, 1995. Posted at: City Hall Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office •..-•H/IL . 1 - •.... •---------- REQUEST FOR COITVCIL ACTION DATE: July 19. ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Naac Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administratcr Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2026 New Horizon Child Care, 875 Wayzata Boulevard - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: RR-IB ToUl area = 7 + acres Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (A) (3) - Signage area variance. Allowed => 12 s.f. r\ Proposed * 50 s.f. (2 sided entry pylon 2 x 16 s.f., 1 sided building sign 18 s.f.) Variance = 38 s.f. or 316% 2. Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (C) - Height/setback. A.Setback Required = 5 ’ Entry pylon = 10 ’ Building signage =50+’ No variance required for setbacks B.Height Allowed = 8’ Entry pylon = 13’ 8" Variance = 5 ’ 8" or 72.5% Note signage for building has been attached to structure requiring no height variance. List of Exhibits A - Application A-1 Applicant’s Request to be Scheduled at July 24 Meeting of Council Plat Map Property Owners’ List Entrv Pvlon Building Pylon E-2 Sign Attached to Building F-1-2 Elevations of Apron B C D E-I Request for Council Action continued Pigc2 July 19. 1995 Zoning File #2026 G - Spec Sheet for Apron H - Additional In. nnation from Signage Contractor Dealing with Llimination ot Building Sign and Canopy I - Topography Map J • Survev/Site Plan Review of Application New Horizon Child Care has purchased the Busy Bea\er Day Care formerly owned and operated by Inge Cici. The new owners request additional signage requiring area and height variances. The Planning Commission reviewed the signage variance application for New Horizon Child Care at their June and July meetings. The application was tabled at the June meeting providing applicant additional time to amend the plan so as to reduce signage area and height of pylon sign. Applicant was asked to e.xplore other methods of reducing signage area needs. In the amended proposal, review Exhibits E-l-2, applicant provided two options for signage adjacent to the day care facility. The first option proposed a free-standing pylon sign at 12’ height (original proposal was 15 ’ 6"). In the second option, the signage would be attached to the structure. Both signs at building location were proposed at 4’ 2V2” x 4’ (18 s.f.). The free-standing pylon sign would be two-sided for a total of 36 s.f. The sign attached to the building would be single sided at 18 s.f. The Planning Commission recommended that sign be attached to building in order to minimize any visual impact upon the elevated Luce Line to the west. Both the signage attached to the building and the entrance apron would be illuminated. Applicant has agreed to install a control timer that would only allow the signage to be illuminated during hours of use which is typical in residential zones. In the applicant ’s amended proposal, the entry pylon has been reduced to 13 ’ 8" (original proposal 17 ’ 8"). The entry pylon will be 4’ x 4’ and two sided. It will not be illuminated. The Planning Commission has recommended that the signage also include notice of entrance to the day care facility. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A, applicant notes the following: 1. Unique topography at this site presents a need for additional height and signage. tv Request for Council Action continued P>gc 3 July 19, 1995 Zoning File #2026 2. 3. The speed of trafTic along this section of Highway 12 docs not follow the 45 m.p.h. speed limit. Speeds are usually 50-1 “ m.p.h. There is a special need to provide signage alerting oncoming traffic from both the east and west ot the entrance to the day care. Unique location of access to facility at far east of property and day care located to the far west. Both applicant and staff have talked with the Minnesota Department of Transpsirtalion concerning special signage along the road right-of-way. We were advised that Mn/DOT had special signage for school crossings but nothing for a day care facility. Stall spoke with Bill Warden of Mm'DOT. He noted that he would be happy to meet with the sign contractor to stake the edee of the right-of-way. He also noted the need for signage at the entrance because of the locatio'n of the driveway in relation to the facility. He concurred with applicant’s comments for the need to alert oncoming cars from the east of the approaching entrance because of sighting problems created by the curvature of the road. Hanning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of a height and signage area variance for New Horizon Child Care for their lacility located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard and approved a 5’ 8" or 72.5% height variance for the entry pylon and a signage area variance of 38 s.f. or 316% for the two-sided entry pylon at 32 s.f. and building sign at 18 s.l. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Building sign and entrance apron are to be illuminated only during the hours when day care facility is open for use Applicant’s signage contractor to obtain building pennii for entry pylon, building sienage and iliuminated entrance apron. Applicant shall contact Bill Warden at Mn/DOT offices to confirm location of Highway 12 right-of-way prior to installing sign. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planninc Commission ’s unanimous recommendation for approval. COLHSCIL ACTION REQUESTED: L . To either approve or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTLNG VARIANCES TO MLTSICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.61, SURDIVTSION 2 (A-3) AND (C) FILE NO. 2026 WHEREAS, New Horizon Child Care (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: refer to Exhibit A, attached (licreinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (A-3) and (C) to permit the installation of signage proposed a 50 s.f. where only 12 s.f. is allowed; for a signage area variance of 38 s.f. or 316% and for an entry pylon that is proposed at 13’ 8" where only an 8 height is allowed requiring a 5’ 8" or 72.5% "height variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL\TD by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 3. FINDINGS 'Fhis application was reviewed as Zoning File #2026. Tne property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zonin:. ."tistrict requiring two acres in area. The property consists of 7+ acres. TIv Orono Planning Commission reviewed this variance application on June 19, ISTo and July 17, 1995 and recommended approval of the variances as amended d upon the following unique findings and hardships: The severe sloping topography adjacent to the road right-of-way presents a special need for additional height in signage alerting oncoming traffic of entrance to day care facility. Speed of traffic along this section of Highway 12 does not follow the 45 m.p.h. speed limit. There is a need to provide a quick warning for oncoming east and west traffic of location of day care entrance. Pace 1 of 4 t: C. The unique location of entrance to facilit>^ with entrance located to the far east of the property and the day care located to the far west. D. The curvature in the road presents special siy >age height needs to warn oncoming traffic of entrance location. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances wotild not adversely attect tratlic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61 , Subdivision 2 (A-3) and (C) to permit new signace on the property consisting of a two-sided 4’ x 4’ entry’ pylon sign to be installed at a 13 ’ 8" height and a single-sided illuminated sign at 4’ 2'/6" x 4’ 2'-6" to be attached to the structure at the nonh side and an illuminated apron at the entrance side of the facility, subject to the following conditions: The entrance apron and single-sided building sign shall be illuminated only during the hours when facility is open for use. Applicant’s signage contractor shall met with Bill Warden of the Minnesota Department of Transponation in order to confirm exact location of Highway 12 right-of-way and to ensure minimum 5’ setback would be mainiained. 1. Page 2 of 4 3. Authorities granted by this variance run ». tr. the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must bt exercised by application tor a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance win expire on that date (July 24, 19%). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor 5. The undersigned applicant and authorized representative of New Horizon Child Care has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of Neu Horizon Child Care, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain ot Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of July, 1995. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) Sharon Bergen, Authorized Representative of New Horizon Child Care STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 ■ ? M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _____day of ss. ,199 , before me a Notar>’ Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and ceed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this »v of ,199 , before me a Notary Public w ithin and for said Count,. personally appeared known to me to be fSi jtrr- n( s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that < (frr *. executed the same as his (their) free act and deed Notary Public Pace 4 of 4w CITY OF ORONO - VARL\NCE APPLICATION fU yo y(c 'r-'{y Initial Application Fes S200.00 (S50.CX) per each additional variarerf^ Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no chanse from original application) Variance for non-coniorming strucrares 5-LU.W After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) t:*no,;- .•\..n I- - - r • » ' w » ■! •m-- • « » PROPERTY INFOR.%L\T.oN . Site Addrtss_______^--------------------------------------- Properrv’ Identification Number (P.I.D.)Propertv’ Ideniilicauun >umcc: ^—- r,»pnired sur\ev Attach legal description to applicauon if not ir.duaec on requ^d sune. Date Propern- Acquired (montlvyear) 1 (do) (do noO also mvn the P/^V Gigg Present use of property; ___resiuenuai Zoning District:________________________ " APPLICA xNT u»wLiMtrep Name Phone/ 7 Phone (work\ T- - -------^ rinr t.'‘p.-rr‘r q I —— Address:-7-^^-----lo.------_ . owner (if different than Ph^r^Twor™ ~«r<P V-nil _I (attach ad^ional sheets if necessary) \ariances required Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) /Vtuz---- (atuch additional sheets li necessary) / rf REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ... infom...inn must M Ofto yi^ %'our application to be considered completci I 9- A 'Z- 6. 7. 8. 9. _ Completed of^'^'ners within 150' (vou must obtain this list from - S"n:^;t, cS^p^e ‘;:rofFr^^^^ .V603, oov.- center, 348-3:7.), “calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) cop> 8,. 11 f MSc'surs ev (eaisttns and proposed elevations) tf any changes ine,x.sting grade “ areVopo^J- 'n addition, provide one tl) copy 8>A x Sketches or plans of tloor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8x I ). “■ List of the legal names (include marital status) ot all persons with an interest in the ” property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) :f not current owner(s). ASTnTddendum to this application, please attach a separate list of ,iny ether persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City stall. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember itat vou£ I|'l.^r,nnn,.u..nn lx no. romnlete if the -.hove inf«nT.hti«n has not .been mejudsd. mTaoptora tereby^atSs tc provide all information requited or requested by the Zomng rrJn£o anrees to pay aaiitional fees (staff tune not covered by orig.nal fee payment) a"c~ in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied ts true and correa^ best 0/ hts/her Imowledge, (Date ^ /z ? ^‘7Applicant’s Signatui^p^V^ The owifer^he^^^^^ and agrees to this application and funher authorizes reasonable Inirv onto the property bv City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Co members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Date ,‘r/::L3/cfSOwner’s Signature AoDlicant must have all submituls into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Coi^ission Meetine Plannim: Commission Meetings are he.J on the third Monday ol each m ^ AoDlicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning rm.nril If an aoDlicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements “Save an aumor^d"^ in your place and .0 advise dre Budding & Zoning O.hce of this change prior to the meeting. 8 >■ T-- m ft. newMI HORIZON ^ Child Care ' P / I f ^ J 4# 1 ,.«r iM •>! J i» <• July 6.1995 City of Orono Ms. Jeanne Mabuslh P.O. Box 66 Cr>’sial Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne: New Horizon would like to be placed on the agenda for the next City Council meeting set for July 24, 1995, in consideration of our signage variance. Please let us know if you need anv further information prior to the July 17, 1995, Planning Commission meeting. Please contact myself or Monika Helmen, Regional Manager, at 577-9224 if you have further questions. Sincerely, i/ Sharon Bergen Director of Support Scr\ ices SB:as (612) 557-1111 3650 Annapolis Lane North Plymouth. Minnesota 55447 Monzoo i * *•* V *.•rnifun M/tt/fim 4^rr.. ’r 0 « K:>MTCN M7A 7 « ♦ •■:-ffc JU9kytn UK 'r -i'* ■••fef:. •■''■. jl ' -A. ''■i'# ■ ^' «M»CR NM« TAXRAYEII NMC/AOOR HiM«7IN COUHTr MQKirrV SNFONHlTldN SYmHPROPcrrr (Mcn listn is>iu-ti 41 0010OOOM AOOIICSS UNASSX8NE1I HOtCOXN rORfEITCO CANO ■>10-M ST OECD OirSSit • k >* » 4« y n'.. ■ 10 U-llS-n 4S 0020 DOOM. AOOOESS UNASSIONIO % •URLXNOTQN NORTHERN RY ' Vi; RURLINOTON NORTHERN RY 1 ' ■'i V, *♦ t • ^ ^ ^ !0NNCR NANI vTANRAYCR •*• 4 NANC/AOOR M U-110-21 44 0007 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE or HIM4 STATE OF HXNN imR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL I } V •* • *• !► . •K'ti '• •; RROR AOOR y-^i ONNER NAME k. A TAXFAYER 72 S5-11B-23 44 0002 0041B MAYZATA BLVD H C J BOULEY ETAL E J BOULEY 915 N HAYZATA BLVD NAYZATA m 5BSn r + 'I ' A • • i :y-N WlOP AODR ^ ONNER NAME *. Vtj;TAXPAYER : V MAME/AOOR O'* - ^ . ; / . . . . . A • 4 . TOTAL BATCH .-0" 507 00012 in”.■ • . • ' >•! ,«»v\ O'- . . */ •. ■y '' t f* . / S * » IO' ■^4.'If ! A ►- "W V f X4 -SB S5-11B-ES AS BOOS OOOSB AODKSS UNASSIGNEO P N CXCX A X H CICX RANDELX H A XNGEBORG H CXCX TSIZ TROT U N HAPLE GROVE m S5S11 #SB SS-llB-ES A4 0004 00050 «NAYZATA OLVO H riNNER/MAQENER LLC FENNER/HAGENER UC > X2520 HAYZATA BLVO K HINNETOMCA 55S0S I I ’ •» 72 S5-11S-2S AS OOlf V oom LINDAHOOO LA R E VAN VAUCENBURO ET AL R E A B J VAN VAUENBURO 21S LINOANOOO LANE LONG LAKE MN 55SA1 i 72 S5-116-2S 44 0010 I 00204 LINDAHOOO LA fl RAG RAOLOfF KEITH H RAOLOFF 204 LINDAHOOO LAfS HAYZATA m 55S91 y tr: * / %. ‘/i .' '"y # ft Vyir REPORT NO. P1ASS401 FA(^ 10SB S5-116-2S 4S 0004 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIC^D STATE OF MINN STATE OF Him (IHIRl I LUCE LINE TRAIL) SB S5-118-2S 44 0005 00B75 HAYZATA BLVO N P H CICI A I H CICI FANOEII H A INGEOORO CICI 75S2 TROY LA N HAPLE GROVE HN 55SI1 72 S5-I18-2S 4S 0027 00205 LINDAHOOO LA J SELL A K SELL JEFFREY A KATHLEEN SELL 205 LINDAHOOO LA HAYZATA m 55S41 54 S5-118-2S 44 0008 00&49 HARRINGTON RO CITY OF NAYZATA CITY OF HAYZATA 400 RICE ST HAYZATA MN 55S91 =ti= Jro * • * I- * - ■ K ’ ' .• > V {...'I . t • • «.♦ ' ■ f MM MU ' £ ■ MTCH i07;4flt *■' '”'\i *‘f*m •.V/.% A . ... V•♦. *•' : . ' *• ' \t■>'*.(|i’.-‘ i..'’ • ^ -it- .■'. ■■ '.:f .■ . •- *. »;»* -f' r 4 4 - • : ■ / • .4' • • vrv \ • >. i t f i<; V, . V .\1 * «*.*.;%■ *v’, %. • 4 #. .. < • ; if' .*• ■ *• • ’{‘ V t’- 4 4 ' .f i;’• . '± 5> .*• .•jrJi t- r.V • '■ t. •*. V-* ' ?. .- r vf; V” ‘ • 'Tf'".. .» . t •' , . * *. *» *• * . >J '1 A • » ' •' ■. •* 'mi;:-fv J « 4 < . * f * * ’ • »t• r • ;;i-i‘ ■ .Nv ... i . « i :• < A ’ '1 ' • ; • W • ■ ’ » • ; t ■ * *■ . • $» ' W . ' • f 1 ‘ .. 4. • ■» • 4 • • • V' '! i <7 f 1 Pin couMTY mmnff mFoumrioN systih . ftOraiTY OtCKS LIST ^RCPOST NO. P14SS401 PAGE ITi;Aa V’#'V.1«5fV'' • t*. <4' 1 CERHFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErt«PIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AW) BELIEF, . ^ ^ j i ‘ /i r a r c .v1M_MyL_ ‘■ii ■. !■ 'P “’• i r- • •*, • i' ■ . ■ 1 !-.’' I • *' i 1 • . > • • • i NEW^k HORIZON _ Child Care F Pol ► yj I V(2" owtS-fi- NEW ► J Ic'vr .mJ arov^ J Vz' po /e / « r-> I * n» / /"‘ / >r / /> / / \UA 5f /I' -j ^ I 'vt. /-w ( \ I ^ irafcitiit i3>n ■ ^ W0f m^u m ilfePi'mi-ii! i iisB :it-:s::T:4its:iM ll ‘4. I ;■ *'«lil«ili i ItP#;r irlSr 11 pitsHI iin=ii^ ill f] 1 ^ r-;II ft V ^ Iftil ffi ii I ji,i li BfcK' li ihnliiI li li|! 'i [ij ;jb -I! I rapHiiliplMi i WlijfejjigiiBlgjgiB»itgatli;iiaiMm«iraigii£ii^^m aris't i |i! iii .C/lt'AfJi—Z r-l^cK)r s ^ V/ ^vjo/V)"i / 0^ Co ($r •» ^’- I* Snl;§ R2Vts: ^'i • ^ 1 C/lUC'?i S>-A''FOs-‘Xj' ::% 4 \ \ pr-oA3^ 0 - (oi(c f’/'^'- Ixfl 't-A' ' /)/wiV/V N I *'. ‘Frees ; SIGNS LN-If1ITlD C612J 470-2O34FPK/ OFF 479-S462 P02 AEsteflor AS‘ \N nW \V (612) 478-9460 S2400 Hwy. SS H««m4, Mteevoto SS340 FAX 612-478^034 pr««ldrn| [lrW1 J. lK«r«ccli July 8.1995 City ofOroiio Ms. Jeannf Mab«<5ih F.O. Box 66 Ciyslal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne: In response to the concerns of the Pl.mninj Cominisslon. I ssanled to advise you of the ss.s a-? 4 r"* ”‘ifabricated to meet underv^rner Lawraiufics v'-'*-/ ................1 ' nte siens end canopies contain cold ucather ballasts and draw 7 of power. W e have iiHtalled U.is identical application in many residential areas for New Uortron and have been >iiveevsful in controlling them using timers. If you h.ive any further questions, plcdse do not hesiUte 10 contacl me. Sincerely, Michael Dvoracek MD'as ------ III COUNaiMEEntjG JUL ? 4 1995 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Of ORCNO DATE: July 19. 1995 ITEM NO.: j rr Department ApproTal: Name Jeanne A. Mabusili Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator RcTici>red:Anemia Section: Zoning Item Description: #2034 Mary and Gene Zulk. 1400 Cherry Place - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC Total lot area =* 11,404 s/. Brief Review of Application Please review the enclosed staff memo of July 10. 1995 for more detail on this review. The application involves a request to install a 10’ x 26.3 ’ covered deck addition to the street side of the residence. No setback variances are required. The improvement will result in a structural coverage increase of 263 s.f. or 2.3%. Structural coverage exists at 17.6% and is proposed at 19.9% (allowed 15%). The original proposal also called for a hardcover increase of 213 s.f. or 2.64%. Hardcover exists at 3,962 s.f. or 49.2% and was proposed at 51.8%. Planmng Commission members asked for the removal of an additional 175 s.f. of stone patio area to the noith side ot the residence reducing hardcover to 4,000 s.f. or 49.6%. Hardcover would now be increased only 48 s.f. or 0.5%. Hardcover is amended as follows: 75-250’ setback area = 8,059 s.f. .Allowed = 2,015 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,962 s.f. or 49.2% Original proposal = 4.175 s.f. or 51.8% Amended proposal = 4.000 s.f. or 49.6% Hardcover increase = 48 s.t. or 0.5% (original 213 s.f. or 2.64 /c) Variance = 1,985 s.t. or 24.6% With the intent to reduce hardcover and structural coverage excesses, the Planning Commission considered all other improvements on the property and found that remaining improvements were not excessive and the majority of improvements were needed to provide reasonable use of this substandard property. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application as amended. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions ot the Planning Commission s recommendation. COLNCH. ACTION RE(^L ESTED: To either approve or amend *he enclosed approval resolution A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) AND 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 2034 WHEREAS, Gene A. Zulk and Mar>' T. Zulk (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1400 C herry Place within the City of Oiuno and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 4, Crystal Bayview, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to th: City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of a 10’ x 26.3 ’ covered deck addition to the street side of the residence seeking approval of a structural coverage variance of 564 s f. or 4.9%, structural coverage exists at 17.6% and is proposed at 19.9%, and 4,000 s.f. or 49.6% hardcover improvements art- proposed within the 75-250 ’ setback area where only 25% is allowed and where 3,962 s.f. or 49.2% exists. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^2034. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property consists of 11,404 s.f. or .26 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17, 1995 and recommended approval of the variance application as amended, based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. There is no adjacent land available for applicant to acquire. Paee 1 of 5 Ir B. The property is smaller in area than the surrounding lakeshore lots on Chcrr>' Place. The majonty of the surrounuing properties are made up of two lots that are legally combined as one building site. C. The steep topographies at the west side of the propeny require an access 'jrc or path leading from parking area to residence. D. Existing access to interior of residence at both the west and north side of the residence is inadequate and unsafe. E The proposed structural improvement will have no impact on adjacent residential properties. Boih adjacent property owneis have submitted letters in support of the proposed improvement plan. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property arc peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other propeny in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLLSIONS, ORDER AND CONDH IONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby crams v.arianccs -o Municipal Zoning C.xie Sections 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C) and 10.2*. Subdivision 2 to pcrmii consiruciion of a 10' x 26.3’ covered deck addition to the street or west side of the residence resulting in an increase of 263 s.t. or structural coverage variance of 564 s.f. or 4.9% and an increase ot 48 s.l. or 0.5% hardcover^ Total hardcover is approved at 4.000 s.f. or 49.6%. Approval is subject to the followtng conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. ■7 3. Prior to the footing inspection for the new construction, applicant shall remove 175 s.f. of stone patio area as shown on Page 5 of this resolution. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application tor a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that flate (July 24, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions ol this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdeme.mor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms ol this resolution and on behalt of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall in. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) , ,qq^ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day ol July, 1 JvD by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. HaUin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv Public Page 3 of 5 gcmriiaUMlifl i rl' r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this_______day of ss. , 199___, before me a Notary Public w ithin and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who execute J the foregoing insirumcni, and acknowledecd that he (Uiey) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 , before me a Notary Public within and tor said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foiegoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 /UOL'4 f LUIAM O. SCHOeUU •rvfico c:vtv cn<jihcc « t«. 7ta •••. •aft mm, 9AC. •aa Wwr. mmr, taia*« SCHOELL 6t MADSON, INC engineers ft SURVEYORS 90 NII^TH AVtNUt SOUTN iaia*«€*OTA pMOMK; iiuK^cssssn / 7/-r* 935-7601 CARLISLE MaoSCN 9Cai9TK90 LAND tuiavtTCV ^ «tO. 4t?4 • a. 0A«. 7tl '»a MO. a.«f4 IOWA . aT«a I ••• CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY T£:i?i?y Go3£L^ FQB. cc.< < - i 4. .................>J o.£-^k'£ I A/r/Jr:^ ^NoST/-£ AeNT) 1 ■».r ^ !os 3S— r — *t3.2 it — rf A o - Denotes iron monumenr foaneJ •i .. C^noF£s iron rnonuman^ S£^ a - Gsnoias nvco<^ THiS ITEM M BEiH MISF.OFjIMED /V^' IERE3Y CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATICN OF A SURVEY OF THE JNOARIES OF: * Lot /, SLcck^ B ay COUMTT i Mi/V/V^SOT-A ' OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENX&. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. ____ - »//// V' .« 'TS SURVEYED BY ME THIS OAY OF. SHOtVS 7%^<ST LOCATIOA/ SrAiCdS AS ei£T F-OtS A ‘=>f^OFCSeD 2AS£T BY' aWNSS. JuuY nCOtSTKRCO i^AMO aURV«YOR Mini^. No. 8414 Pace 5 of 5 TTIT [tilTil Zoning File /!'2034 July 10, 1995 Page 2 I - Hardcover Inventory 75*250’ Setback Area Jl-2 - Survey/Site Plan K - Floor Plan L - Elevation Description of Request Applicants propose a I0’x26.3 ’ covered deck addition to the street side of the residence. The proposed structure will require no setback variances nor is there an encroachment ot an average lakeshore setback line. The proposed addition will involve 263 s.f. or 2.3% increase in structural coverage where 17.6% exists and only 15% is allowed. The improvements result in a 213 s.f. or 2.64% increase in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area existing at 49.2% and proposed now at 51.8%. Statement of Hardships Refer to Exhibit F, applicants note the following: 1. Refer to Exhibit D. applicants note that lots on either side of property are double in area. Prop d structural improvement would have no impact on the adjacent residential properties. Review Exhibits Hl-2, adjacent property owners have submitted letters in support of improvement plan. 2. There is no adjacent land available to acquire. 3.The propeny is smaller in area than the surrounding lakeshore lots on Cherry Place. Once again refer to Exhibit D. note the majority of surrounding parcels arc made up of two lots that are legally combined as a building site. 4. Existing access to residence is inadequate and unsafe. 5.An older member of the applicants ’ extended family requires a safer and easier method to access structure than what exists today. Issues for Consideration 1.Are there existing or proposed improvements that can be reduced in size? Can stone patio area at northeast side of residence be either removed or reduced in area, existing at 175 s.f. or 2 2%? What other improvements can be considered for removal or reduction? > ■ • Zoning File #2034 July 10. 1995 Page 3 2. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. OpticHis of Action To deny, approve or amend the current variance proposed, seek approval of lot coverage and hardcover variances within 75-250’. Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. j Initial Application Fee $200.00 (550.00 per each additional varla Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION n. Site Address /^OQ C"-ke.r^^—111 ______Tj______NJumK^r T O ^ / (H),-r*> ^ •.4 .R', /i: i ^ CITY CF CiiCNO f;.vavle office i 7CV, TmT.*I t I.' I ri» ni rC\jV ^ cui t r *l V' V' • ^ ■ /K^ Date Pmpfim Acquired ^ 1^ SS--------------------------------------- I (do) (SnSl) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. Present use of property': Residential -----other (specify)-------------- Zoning District:_______—USt-------------------------------------------------- . 'ucri' k.1 ik.u A CHECK 193. ixECEIHl-THm' ya- 4TVJ' i^‘l» C‘(M ji*fTw* w*i.'"»w*v wvva t\\^A t V VW/ ft. <=’«=' / T- (month'year) applicant - Phonetbome) V7/- 8oo/_ Phnnei work) V 7 2» — O ^ feo--- Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name -------------------------- Phondhome) Phone (work)_ Address:City:Zip: description of reqlt :st Describe request in detail:___* Estimated Construction Cost $ _____________________ -7P>OCj . (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot .Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HAHnCHIP/DESCRlFFlON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTl'CONDITIONS '^erftfundue hardship or practical difficulty ot unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements ----------------------------------- S«*-C£_ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following infnrmation must be submj tted bv th^ applicat!on.de Mline_date in order for vour application to be cons idered complete: ^ 1. —♦ 3. #i»4. 6. ^7. ^9. Completed Application Form . — Cenified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain ^is list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603. Govt Center. 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Cenificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S.': x 11 for reproduction. „ . ... , Topographic surv ey (existine and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade “ are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 3;/.' x 11" for reproduetton Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8V2 \ 11 ). — List of the legal names (include marital stams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include aame(s) of applicant(s) it not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please atucb a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by Citv' staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vfiriance application is not complete if the_ah ove information has not been includccL APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . u u 7 The applicant herebv aizrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signanire Date A —’ / OWTVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and lunlier authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by Citv- staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signamre —*—■Date 6-/^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each nionth. ApplicMts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 ^ •JL r, fi . •*. \ • DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST K We wish to add an open porch to the road side (main entrance side), of our house. The porch will provide a covered (with a roof), safe entrance to our house and will also to allow us to safely use the side entrance to our house. The side entrance is rx3t safety usable at this time. The porch will run the width of our house and extend around the north side to connect to the existing lariding of the side entrance to our house. Please see attached plan/drawing for specific details » • b 1 J •7 ^ f June 18.1995 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth. As a follow-up to our telephone conversation and your suggestion In May. I am requesting to have our variance and permit application reviewed at the July 17 and July 24 meetings. As we discussed in May, I am a high school principal, and my window of opportunity to do the porch closes the 2nd week of August. Your willingness to consider our applications in July is sincerely appreciated. Thank you Sincerely. Gene Zuik 1 •" > \t'^ * ■ *r;ni - c.-»r •** . V fvif"V-'' .y-p .. r • t UJI*> ^ o ' 'i 4. - • —> W Jl a^7!:;'.rr^*''’'''':''^'r'- . -a •’ ' y-'y:.-y:r:f^- ; '■ ■ »•.•.* .'j.v''-• •• V ^"ii’n-” • M >y* ->! C > Cl >- 15 ^ JtJU ^ - cKW <5 '6 a» - t.’« •6 N o .*00 t5 ^ ^ fK1 MlfJiJlE AVE C) CO 1^:- jO •jU •ju JO *A) 1 tjt — 04 “ *>j - t’^j o V 5-*^'4 HJ '4 •W 8 rv O s ;5 ^ V)V?*0 •0 *0 *•.) 1 »^ ?\^ 5 \ '^v I TT b '4o •J - V t n / w^r*^ *iyi Oa c= [ury*^\ r- 1'-' & »S» iiii: 4h « - U* "> ^L'^- •S4 - W3 ’4J^ 02 *0 'TJ 'O’. 2 \V?^s- D<hRi<r RL tn 5U jo JO . A ^0 mm .J s« ^>m rs>*v# C4 ^s 9. fvj -§Oi *71 4T ■> ca =Q T |S2-'^\>::^ ■-» oi MAPLE ^£.17-4.11-90 ^'i-iZ-Lll-S*^ t\‘ M ^7> fUR MTE M7CH 504AOOII .OMNER NMC TiP<RAYCII MAME/AINNI OtCII NAW TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR , \’ PROP AOOR ONNER MAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADOR OmER HAK TAXPAYER HAME/ADDR IM 00-U7-E3 SE 0001 OISOS CHERRY PL T R JAMES AHA JAMES THOMAS R A MARGARET A JAMES 1S55 CHERRY PL MOUND MN * S53A4 30 00-117-23 32 0023 QllfO CHERRY PL TAG BLOUNT TERRY J BLOUNT 1330 CHERRY PL ORQNO MN S53A4 30 00-117-23 33 0021 01415 CHERRY PL E A SCHMIDT A C A SCHMIDT E ALLEN SCHMIDT 1415 CHERRY PL S HOUND MN 55364 *30 00-117-23 33 0081 01410 CHERRY PL T 0 HXLOUR A A T NIlBlfR THOMAS 0 A ANT4E T HILDUR 1410 CHERRY PL MOUND m 55364 HEftlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY COMERS LIST30 00-117-23 32 0002 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY Of QRONO EXTENTION OF STREET 3/a/OO ST DEED 150324 30 00-117-23 33 0012 01400 CHERRY PL G A 2ULK AMT 2UU GENE A A MARY T ZULR 1400 CHERRY PL MOUND m 55364 38 00-117-23 33 0022 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED E ALLEN AND CAROL A SCHMIDT E ALLEN AND CAROL A SCHMIDT 1415 CHERRY PL S MOUND m 55364 REPORT NO. PI4S54Q1 PAGE 12* ..ri• I % 0 TOTAL BATCH 504 00010 t <1 •y ‘ • 9- i S8 08-117-2S SZ 0022 01S70 CHERRY >L T 0 NAFSTAO ETAL T 0 C H NAFSTAO 1S70 CHERRY PLACE NOUNO m 5SS44 5« 00-117-25 55 OOlS 01A50 CHERRY PL J R NARTXN A 0 J MARTIN JAMES R A OETSY J MARTIN 1450 CHERRY PL HOUND Itl 5B544 36 08-117-23 S3 0023 0143S CHERRY PL EVANS JOHNSON ETAL EVANS JOHNSON 1A5S CHERRY PLACE MOUND Mr: S55M » • t A I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEriTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AT® TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAR1MENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE SEST OF MY KNONLEDGE ANO BELIEF. DATE '.V ^r' » • - *..-U!*• # t ' ' i 5 ; r • ' • -" i :. s' • V i- • ■ ?.■' ■ * t V V : • A , . ? 4 r{ V. J ^ IJk 5^ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS 1. Safety concerns: we currently have a very small concrete steps and landing to the main entrance of our house. Neither the steps or the land has a railing. The steps are very steep with little depth (only two 9 inch steps to the landing) The new porch would have 4 steps to the landing The current landing is small (38 inches by 58 Inches) and allows little room for entering the house especially with grocery bags or other items. There is no place to set anything down while you open the outside door and unlock the inside door. My wife’s father. A.B. (BUD) TYLER JR., who is 84 years old lives with us the year arourxl. and has difficulty with the stairs. We leave early in the morning for work, and worry about him leaving and returning from the house on his own to go to senior citizens. We really worry about his getting the door unlocked and maneuvering into tfie house in the winter (landing is not covered and there is only 12 Inches between the door and the edge of the landing). 2. We are unable to safely use the side entrance to our house. The steps leading to the side entrance landing, the railing and the side entrance landing itself would not meet safety code requirements. We simply don t use it. The new porch would extend around the north corner of the house and connect to the current side entrance landing, and would meet code standards. This would provide us with another safe entramce to our house. 3. Unfortunately, our house is on a smaller lot. We have no chance of purchasing more property on either side of our home. Fortunately, both of our adjacent neighbors have larger lots. 4. Both adjacent neighbors (Terry and Gretchen Blount. Tom and Ann Wilbur) are aware of our request to add a porch, the porch plans/drawing, and the reasons why we want to add the porch Please see attached letters from Mr. and Mrs. Blount and Mr. and Mrs. Wilbur. # o' Adjacent Property 0«Tiers’ Acknowledgement Form T(wel~TP5i “/^Q-of 14(0 CfetCh M [print name(s)][print address] ChlfV^ , (WO unde^ind (ha. In eaecu.mg ^ ^hf Cl“ C;?nd.r.T(trar(X;ire ol'l pl- and ,ha. (he proposed neighbor's project or use requires Cotificil approval. 6/^/7^ Property Owner Date Bf Property Owner I (we) "1^1-1, 5, Blouh'f of Chet ru Place. ' --------^ ^ [print address] ’[print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at PWd lso referred to as Land Use Application No.------------ I (we) underst^d that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declarl approval or disapproval of the propeny or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed nugh project or use requires Council approval. Property 0\^ner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least ay p to the scheduled meeting date. .r-^ O ^■''1 O jj ; •• ;.'j _ *^>^ ^ W <J-^JUNE 17. 1995 Orono City Council: We currently reside at 1390 Cherry Place, and are neighbors to Mary and Gene Zulk. We are aware of the Zulk’s request to add a covered porch to their home at 1400 Cherry Place. The Zulks have shown us the porch plans and we would support their request for a variance. Mary ’s father, Bud, lives with the Zulks and we know that they are concerned g^out his getting into and out of the house safely. Again we would support their request for an variance. Sincerely. ’ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7r « EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ^7. ^ x 250-500* Lcngib Widdi X X X B. Cange C. Driveway 22.3 22- Se£ X D. Sidewalk P^4CLk/^9 E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X £L TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 37^7 - B //X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 2^ e y/ f 77A/<y i id^ecAj njj£_ Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck_ F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^k^oo B ./ / , ^-4 X 100 /r24 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. — S.F. 3Tg7 S.F. A 1I I "T -r m 2^3 S.F. S.F. S.F. r2/i ')S.F. —S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. —S.F. S.F. -—S.F. S.F. ---S.F. —S.F. S.F. 0 _S.F. S.F. % Hv • • • '* A T B - - I n i t t -.. - -i/j.>L-------------- Z^7~ / , -4 ^ ys7-/3/- B/f y y/eu> f/£j/A/. /b. yni/<^Al£yf'^ loT fidt fi - - O' /■ - /.AH£ MTKA , SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. 972-3221 8997 Cty. M. 13 SE O*l«no. MN 96328 I hereoy certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date; -77<* ^ ^9^ -Registration No. 14700 JOB# 4S^// Book - Pag* 33-6 Scale WiLUAM O. SOiOCUU rairmiro civiu cNomuH mtmm. mo. aa«« •«. OA« raa avfs. »•. c.«fT« rwAfUOA aart »A«. aaai mmmr. /tfOc' C^/Z^f^u-L / SCHOELL a MADSON, iNt. CNGINCERS a SURVEYORS ^97-*rCARLISLE MADSON CAMO VuAVCTC* •O NINTH AVtNUt SCUTN ho^imv. MINNCSOTA PHONE; 938-7601 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR /£I^^^Y G0B£L P? I 1 A/ry<;;4 Aje/^) n a - - Donates iron monumeni" found • Dsno/ss iron monumert^ se^ Osnoies tvood e^aJc€ A THiS n* •!». ;!iK MlSHOFaMEB MO- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: Lot /> B locuo j , ‘dsysTAL BAy t//ety" HOUfV£Rl/V CoUNTT, MlNUirSOTA AND OF THE LC \TION OF ALL. BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALO_ VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. CZrMf AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS-------------------2__L-DAY OF___ tT yACSO SHOnS TUC locat /o/v or STAKCZS AS SBT r~Oi^ A P^PCS&O QA/ZAiBS Br Otvnse. ----- July 73 ftEaiETEACO LJINO EUMVEYOP A///W. No. 84/4 T> , . / . c y '4- V- vX ^ -f vv> ) v>\ cv 3 c?-,c/ —..— t Ll \ L J 7 »* V rl u> o O > N \^/°..ll <y vj ,3 iV ^ H (D 1 • f f -i c/ 7J.SIqj^ 0f%^ & V o ,» V3 rvl I - PoflCti PitifJS__ / / v\ f _ZulC \IJ0 - •'•• -» ^ >»ct. - - K J -71 - 5-?i \.\ v\ \ js C 4 ir ». ’* i?S 6 - !»(. :•'•«•'■•* % » • ir- I I ■' .-u,. J%.* Ls-*. 2^L s \ >$ d* A y ^ '1, • U jlll^ Ti:*tC 3^#i> - 11 * f ia ♦ I :,-3 3T r?-'.-: 'S-'x! :, j u. F .• • aaen ✓ -I y i-— «««••'•r s>.*-. I___I Cjo ' * Bfic t £lev»ttom 1/ . y .n i4.v '“f- U/rttL Sc;ti,2»4^ . • .V: • REQLT:ST for COtTVCIL ACTION - ^ DATE: July 20, 1995 ’ Of ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Rod Moorse Title City Administrator Iption: Volunteer Commission Appointments Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Mayor/Council Report The Council has completed interviews for two volunteer commission positions, one on the Planning Commission and one on the Park Commission. The Planning Commission term expires on March 31, 1998. The Park Commission term expires on December 31, 1995. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint___to a three year term on the Planning Commission expiring March 31, 1998. Motion to appoint__to the Park Commission for a term that expires on 12/31/95. I ^ : 3 I i^f I I** -3» ^ ’".w*— t 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene AnderlikSi Associates Engineers & Architects •« : s*r» ^ • w i- •' H.- # :•# -: ■*..- •:..«*« r—: v./\* *• 4.f p A ^ • C.*.x* • VI..‘•^? -: v« r ~ £.^ V\» . —•*• % "C p ^c-c-« j y. ‘i f •“%'*.•'• .-• *• *C C '* • , A ’ V.*».t A • t.•.:.*• I‘^'1 •? •*1, .5.rf..r /»• z.-.n-: •• •• . «>• w *h r, - . _ • *• — .••• 4-V • • • . •• • • *M *« # »rf« • •W » .*.-••••- •* “ ^ . . .. A • • • <• •<l»r^ *? t-**, - t,.f?—-» M I * v»A*:< •**. Ml.-» J: •? •.#,.-^ * M fi ^ »•/ M 'V>f - *f » . fir-: --e V •■ i h»r i : r. ^-.- ■•’• .’t • «*<•*• % .'» ^ -• *-v. k^‘, a;* ■ ^ lifen^p V 4—? -.f- fi 4. C.*^*v ■« • f . • • i-»«v.'»* *t C'*i* iff •■ \« '*• |£f «l ^ (*^*^» A* D ** • ' »« .*.'• v. . I*, f •••.• ,'VlCU*- ^ f.-—If M •4*e» |f% t' 4^.k • • •• r****** ' " •. -•* i* • V • •.’ •«• •« I «I ^'*V* 4 • ..- •> *■ • ! *r *fi July 20, 1995 City of Orono P.6. Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 55325 4 u »o Atteniion; Mr. John CethaiJson ClTY Of ORONO Re; Brown RoaJ Reconstruction. SAP 1 52-107*01 Watertown Road Culven. S.AP 152*103-01 File No. 13972 Dear Jolin: Enclosed »« *r=e (3) siened copies of request for peyraent for the above referenced project. This portion of the work has'been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. A breakdown of the cost to each project is a.s follows: Broad Road SI4.665.60 Watciiown Culvert f3?..T68 91 Request #4 5 . S.0.34. 51 If you have any questions please call. Yours very tioily, BONESTROO. ROSE.N’c .\NDERLIK v.^: .ASSOCIATES. Es'C. Harlan M. Olson HMO:lk Enclosures %-,-Tc kv/o<t Winhw^'/ 36 ■ St. Poul MN 55113 • 617-6 36-11600 L’ Ow»«r City of Orono, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay. MN 5323 Datejnly 13, 1995 For Period February 13, 1995 to July 13. 1995 Request No. 4 I Buffalo BitMiiuBoua, 2852 County Road 12 North, Buffalo. MN 55313 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT MUNICIPAL STATE AID IMPRON EMENTS BROWN ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - SAP 152-107-01 WATERTOWN ROAD CUL3TRT- SAP 152-103 01 FUc No. 13972 SUMMARY 1 Origmal Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order • Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Sub-Total 10 Less Amount Paid PreNiously 11 AMOUNT DUE nilS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTR ANDJERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: June 16, 1995 Date: 566,506.5< $566,506.5< $411,942.4- $1,94h.0‘ $413,886.41 s 20,694.32 $393,192.16 $315,157.65 $78,034.51 Uail Coalnicl Qmmtifir Unit Prtet QttaiitiCy To Date Aaiount To Date Brown Road North Part A - Street » SAP i52 107-01 2101^01 Clearing (tree) 2101.506 Grubbing (tree) 2104.501 Remove concrete curb & gutter 2104JOl Remove pipe culvert 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement 0104.601 Relocate mailboxes, signs, etc. 0105.609 Geotextile fabric. Type V 2105.501 Common excavation (P) 2105.507 Subgrade excavation 2105 J21 Granular borrow (CV') 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV) 2211.501 Aggregate base, C1.5, 100% crushed quarry rock 2331.504 AC-1 bit. material for mixture 2331.508 Type 41 wearing course mix. (1995) 2331.510 Tvpe 31 binder course mLxture 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture 2331.518 Bituminous mixture for walk SP-1 Driveway restoration 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat 0412.604 Modular block retaining wall 2451.511 Coarse filter aggregate (CV) 2502.54 1 4" perforated PE pipe drain 2506.522 Adjust frame and ring cstg. 2521.501 4” concrete walk 2531.501 Concrete curb Sc gutter-Design B618 SP-2 Reinforcing for cone, curb & gutter 0531.602 Pedestrian curb ramp 2563.601 Traffic control 2564.531 Furn.& inst. sign panels, Tvpe C 0564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) paint 0564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) epoxy 0564.603 4” wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow epoxy AC 0.2 2.000.00 0.2 400.0 AC 0J2 2.000.00 0.2 400.0' LF 40 4.00 30 120.0( LF 540 7.00 460 3,220.0( SY lOJOO 1.25 10,115 12.643.75 LS I 500.00 1 500.0( SY 14,400 1.00 14,105 14.105.0f CY 12.000 3.25 12,000 39,000.00 CY 1,200 4.00 850 3.400.00 CY 600 10.00 CY 1,850 5.00 TN 9,700 8.50 6419.62 71,566.77 TN 231 125.00 170.49 21.311.25 TN 1.050 17.00 TN 1,400 15.00 1,134.01 17,010.15 TN 1.750 15.00 1,965.76 29.486.40 TN 580 30.00 2 4 SY 550 10.00 GL 1,500 1.00 250 250.00 SF 1.300 13.00 CY 50 10.00 50 500.00 LF 850 7.00 297.5 2.082.50 EA 4 200.00 SI-20 5.00 7,230 5.00 6,737 33,685.00 U-360 0.50 250 125.00 EA 5 125.00 2 250.00 LS 1 5,000.00 J.75 3,750.00 SF 37.5 35.00 EA 1 30.00 EA 1 50.00 5,500 0.20 LF 5,500 0.20 RP-1 H • Vmh CosIncI Qmmmiatf Umit rrtc€ QmmmiHf To DuU Amcmmi T i DaU 0564.603 4" broken line^ yellow paint LF 500 0.20 0564.603 4" broken Imc. yelkm epoi^LF 500 0.20 0564.603 4* wide solid line, white paint LF 100 1.25 0564.603 4^ wide solid line, white epoxy LF 100 1.25 0564.603 6* solid line, white paint • LF 320 1.25 0564.603 6* solid line, white epoxy LF 320 1.25 0264.603 24" solid line, white paint LF 60 1.25 0564.603 24" solid line, white epojcy LF 60 1.25 2571 JOl Spruce Colorado Blue 6' hi. B 0 E/\50 157.00 257U02 Maple Sugar 3" caL, B & B E^\25 235.00 2571302 Ash Summit 3" Cal. BAB EA 25 235.00 2573.503 Silt fence, preassembled LF 700 2.00 2575.501 Roadside seeding AC 1.5 150.00 2575.502 Seed, mixture 500 LB 150 3.50 2575.505 Sodding. Type lawn SY 9.400 1.40 2575.511 Mulch material. Type I TN 3.0 150.00 2575.519 Disk anchoring AC 1.5 55.00 2575.523 Wood fiber blanket SY 200 1.50 2575.531 Commercial fertilizer, analysis 20-10-10 TN 0.7 400.00 200 400.00 Total A . Street - SAP 152-107^01 S254.205.82 Part B-Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 2501.515 12" RC pipe apron LA 3 400.00 5 2,000.00 2501.515 15" RC pipe apron LA 2 425.00 1 425.00 2501.51524" RC pipe apron EA 1 550.00 2 1,100.00 0501.602 Trash guard for 15" RC pipe apron EA 2 300.00 5 1,500.00 0501.602 Trash guard for 24" RC pipe apron EA 1 500.00 2 1,000.00 2503.511 12" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Dcs. 3006 U-410 23.00 463.5 10.660.50 2503.511 15" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Dcs. 3006 \JF 470 25.00 516 12.900.00 2503.511 18" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Dcs. 3006 LF 684 31.50 790 24.885.00 2503.51124" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Dcs. 3006 LF 156 33.00 164 5.412.00 SP-3 Construct catch basin, Dcs. 3-4 EA 2 500.00 2 1.000.00 SP-4 Construct catch basin, Dcs. 3-6 EA 7 700.00 9 6,300.00 SP-5 Construct CBMH, Dcs. 3-5 EA 11 1,200.00 10 12.000.00 SP-6 Construct inlet control structure RP-2 lUtm Uaii CoBtnict QMsUty Unit Price 0«Aiility To Date Aatoost To Date Design 4-2.4' dia. SP-8 Connect to exist, stonn manb' le SP*9 Cut into existing stonn sewer 2511.501 Random rip rap. CL III - DELETBD Total D-Storm Sewier-SAP 152-107-01 EA EA EA C\' 1 2 1 28 1.150.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 1 13 6 l.ISO.Of* 3.900.0( 1,800.01 $86.032J( Watertown Road Cuhert Part C-SAP 152-103-01 2101.501 Clearing 210U06 Grubbing 2104.501 Remove pipe cuKcrt 2104J05 Remove bituminous pavement 2104.509 Remove guard posts 0105.609 Geotcxtilc tabric. Type V 2105.501 Common excavation (P) 2105.521 Granular borrow (CV) 2105.523 Common borrow (CV) 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV) 2211.501 Aggregate base. CL5,100% crushed quarry rock 2221.501 Aggregate shouldering. Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock 2331.504 AC-1 bit. material for mixture 2331.508 Type 41 wearing course mixture 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture SP-1 Driveway restoration 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat 2451.501 Structure excavation. Cl U (P) 2451.511 Coarse filter aggregate (CV) 2501.511 12" CM pipe culvert 2501.511 48" RC pipe culvert.C1.4,17cs. 3006 2501.515 12' CM pipe apron 2501.515 12" RC pipe apron 2501.515 48" RC pipe apron 0501.602 Tra.sh guard for 48" RC pipe apron AC 0.3 2.000.00 0.3 600.00 AC 0.3 2.000.00 OJ 600.00 LF 64 20.00 64 1.280.0C SY uoo 1.25 1.200 1.500.00 Ej\40 10.00 40 400.00 SY 2.600 1.00 2.400 2.400.00 CY 1.450 3.50 1.450 5,075.00 CY 600 10.00 90 900.00 CY 1.000 6.00 700 4.200.00 CY 300 6.00 TN 1.500 8.50 1.250 10.625.00 TN 130 10.00 75 750.00 TN 18 125.00 23 2.925.00 TN 135 17.50 132 2.310.00 TN 180 16.00 276.82 4.429.12 SY 30 10.00 22 220.00 GL 100 1.00 CY 750 4.00 750 3.000.00 CY 120 14.00 90 1.260.01 LF 50 24.00 160 3.840.00 IP 124 140.00 112 15.680.0C 1L\■)70.00 7 490.00 lA 1 400.00 1 400.00 EA 1 1.270.00 1 1.270.0C lA 1 950.00 1 950.00 RP-3 Ucii SP>7 CoiBtnict inlet control stntctnte. Design 4-2, 6* dia. 25! 1.501 Random rip rap. O. IV - DELETED 2554.5tli Traffic barr’cr, Des. B8307 2554.509 Guide post. Type A 2554.511 Anchoring assembly - plate beam 2554.523 Twisted end treatment 2563.601 Traffic control 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4* wide solid line, white paint 2573.503 Silt fence, preassembled 2575.501 Roadside seeding 2575.502 Seed, mixture 500 2575 J05 Sodding. Type lawn 2575311 Mulch material. Type I 2575319 Disk anchoring 2575.531 Commercial fertilb.er, analysis 20-10-10 Total C-SAP 152-103-01 Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price EA 1 uoo.oo CY 28 0.00 I-F 500 10.00 EA 82 25.00 EA 0 200.00 EA 2 450.00 LS 1 5,000.00 LF 1,100 0.20 LF 1,100 0.20 LF 300 2.00 AC 0.4 200.00 LB 40 3.50 SY 700 1.50 TN 0.8 150.00 AC 0,4 75.00 TN 0.1 400.00 Alternate Bid • Contractor shall bid cable cone, in lieu of random rip rap. Base bid for rip rap will not be paid in this case. Brown Road North Part B - Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 SP-10 Cable concrete, CC-20 Total Part B - Storm Sewer SF 256 Watertown Road Culvert Part C - SAP 152-103-01 SP-1! Cable concrete. CC-35 Total Part C - Culvert SF 320 RP4 Quantity TeDatfi Amount To Date 1,200.0' 5.000.01 200 400.01 $71,704.12 5.00 50.01. 6.00 SO.OC . r.. ItUi Uatt Coatnui QmmmiU/tf Urn! Prtc« Qvantity T« Dalt Aamiat To Date Total A - Street - SAP 152-107-01 Total B - Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 Total PartC- 152-103-01 Total Alt. • Part B Total Alt. • Part C Total Work Completed to Date 2S4.205.S2 86,032.3( 71.704.12 0.00 0-00 $411.94144 Material on hand 1.944.04 RP-5 # ntOIECT PA^ Project No. file No. Contractor ’ STATUS City of OroBO Browo Rd. Rccontimctioa / Wafertowa Road CuK'ett SAP 152-107-01 / SAP 152-103-01 13972 Boltak} Oitmninons CHANGE ORDERS No. Date 1 Total Change Orders • Add PAYMENT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 5 Period Start 10- 1-94 11- 8-94 2-13-95 10- 1-94 11- 8-94 2-13-95 7-13-95 Payment $18,536 40 229,898.24 66,723.01 78,034.51 6 7 8 9 Total Payment to Date Retainagc, Payment No. Total Amount Earned $393,192.16 20,694.32 $413,886.48 RP Reiainage $975.60 13,075.51 16,587.24 20,694.32 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract • 1 Amoun Completed $19,512.00 261,510.15 329,800.85 411,942.4J $566.506.5( 0.0( $566,506.51 REQUEST FOK COUNCIL ACTION 't// DATE: J’*ly l^. 1^5 4 ^ ’’ ITEM NO: Department ApproT Name Dorothy Hallio Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed: 7 Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Dog Regulation and Licensing Ordinance Amendment Attachment:A. D. Excerpt From League of Minnesota Cities Bulletin - State now’ requires 10 day wait before destroying animals Dated June 23, 1995 Proposed Ordinance This proposed ordinance will make the city’s ordinance conform to the new Slate law which the length of time an animal must be held for redemption by the owner and also includes miscellaneous housekeeping changes. fhe attached ordinance includes the language from the original source ordinance which was in effect 4/1/84 and ordinances adopted in the second senes. Deletions are tdeniilicd with Strikeouts and additions are identified with an underline. The changes are as follows: Subd 10 Animal Pound. Includes the new law changes and changes the length of time impound records are keep. The State Records Retention Schedule states a three (3) year retention period. Subd. 11. Wording change to non-sexist. Subd. 12. Changes wording to conform to enforcement personnel used in Subd. 14 (A). Subd. 13. Wording change to non-sexist and adds size of the letters to be used on the sign. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Ordinance 137. 2nd Series, an ordinance amending Section 9.12 Dog Regulation and Licensing. Ayes_. Nays — ?n... W‘ State now requires 10 day wait before destroying animals After several highly publicized cases, the Iceislarurc acted Lhis session to delay the killing of dogs. cats, and other animals seized by cities and ether animal control agencies under the state’s “cruelty to animals ’ statute (M.S.§§ 343.22 or 343.29). The legislature did not amend its other aniinai health statute (M.S. Chapter 35) which addresses the disposal of seized animals. M.S. 33.171. surd. 3 requires all animals seized by public authontics be held for redemption by the ow ner for at least five regular business da>s. Tnc law was amended to auuhorizc seizure only in circumstances that threaten the life of the animal. (Ch. 244 1995 session laws.) Previous law authorized the immediate humane disposal of seized animals upon the order of a vetennar- ian if the animal was suffering and beyond cure, or seven days after the animal was taken into custody. The law was amended this year, ctfcctivc June 2, 1995, to require holding the seized animal for ten days unless a veterinarian authorizes its immediate destruction. Technically, the law applies only to animals seized under the state laws cited above, which are limned to sinjations where an animal is removed from the possession of an individual due to cruel treatment or lifc-ihreaien- ing environments. Alternately, a method needs to be developed which categonzes animals taken under uhe respective starutes. Until the legislature acts to clarify this apparent inconsistency, cities^mighi want to adopt a uniform ten-day retention penod for ail animals. .Also, all cities should comply with die new provision that animals raised for tood or fiber products not be seized or disposed of without prior examination by a licensed vetennarian pursuant to a warrant issued by a judge. The secunty and notification requirements in state law were also amended. A person claiming an iriterest in an animal may prevent disposition by posting secunty suffi cient to provide for :ne ani.mal s a^oual costs of care and keeping. The secunty must be posted w ithin ten days of the seizure, inclusive ct ^ die date of seizure. / The aumenty uking custody of an animal must deliver or m*ail a notice to a person claiming an interest in Lhc animal, or by posting a copy of the notice at the place where die animal is taken into custody, or by delivering it to a person residing on the property, 2nd by telephoning, if possible. The nonce must include: • A description of the animal seized, the authority and purpose for the seizure; the time, place, and circum stances under which the animal was seized; and the location, address and telephone number for the contact person where the animal is kept; • A statement that a person claiming an interest in die animal may p?ost security to prevent disposition of the animal and may request a hearing concerning the seizure or impound ment; failure to do so within ten days of the date of the notice will result in disposition of the animai; and • A statement that all actual costs of the care, keeping, and disposal of tnc animal are the responsibility of the person claiming an interest in the animal, c.xcept to the extent that a court or hcanng officer finds that the seizure cr impoundm*ent was not substantially justified by law. The notice must also include a form that can be used by a person claimung an interest in the animal for requesting a hcanng under diis subdivision. Upon request of a person claiming an interest in the animal, that must be made within ten days of the date of seizure, a hcanng must be held within five business days of the request, to K determine the validity of the seizure and impoundment. If the seizure was done pursuant to a warrant (under section 343.-2), the hcanng must be conducted by the judze w ho issued the wairani. If the seizure was done under section which authorizes removal of the animal from lifc-thrcaienmg situations, the municipality taking custody of the animal or, in the case of a humane society, the municipality from which the animal was seized, may cither (1) auihonze a licensed vcicnnanan with no financial interest in the matter or professional association with cither party; or. (2) use the services of a hearing officer to conduct the hearing. A person claiming an interest in the animal who is aggrieved by a decision of a hcanng officer under this subdivi sion may seek a court order governing the seizure or impoundment within five days of notice of the order. The judge or hcanng officer may authonze the return of the animal if the judze or hcanng officer finds that: • The animal is physically fit: and • The person claiming an interest in the animal can and will provide the care required by law for the animai. The person claiming an interest in Lhe animal is liable for all actual costs of care, keeping, and disposal of the animal, unless a court or hcanng of ficer finds that the seizure or impound ment was not substantially justified by law. The costs must be paid in full or a munially satisfactory arrangement for payment must be made between the municipality and the person claiming an interest in the animal before return of the animal to the person. This new law went into effect June 2. 1995 so immediate action to con- fonn local policies to the state law is required. S3 June 23, 1995 Page 5 r. SEC. 9.12. DOG REGULATION .AND LICENSING. Subd. 1. Definition. For the purpose of this Section, "owner" means a person who owns, harbors, feeds, boards or keeps a dog. Source: City Code Effective: 4-1-84 Subd. 2. Running at Large and Biting Dogs Prohibited. It is unlawful for the owner of any dog to permit such animal to run at large. Any dog shall be deemed to be running at large with the permission of the owner unless; A. It is on a durable leash secured to an object which it cannot move arai is on the premises of the owner. B. On a leash and under the control or within 10 feet and under the effective command of the accompanying person ot suitable age and discretion. C. In the owners' fenced yard or other suitable enclosure where the dog cannot leave without human assistance. D. In the owners ’ yard and under effective command of an accompanying person of suitable age and discretion present outside in the yard. E. In a vehicle from which the dog cannot leave w ithout human assistance provided it is not left unattended in violation of Minnesota Statutes. Any dog having bitten a person or other animal, shall be forthwith impounded for the period of incubation. Oriimnee 57, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-22-88 Subd. 3. License Required. It is unlawful for the owner ot any dog, si.x months of ace or more, to fail to obtain a license therefor from the City, except as tollow's: A. Dogs confined to a City licensed commercial kenmel need not be individually licensed. B. Docs confined to a City licensed residential kennel shall be individually licensed but need not wear the license tag while they are confined in the kennel. C. Docs currently licensed by anotlier jurisdiction may be temporarily kent in the Citv for a period not to exceed thirty days provided the dog wears a tag or other identification from such licensing jurisdiction, and provided that the cuircnt City license is obtained if the temporary stay extends beyond thiny days or otherwise becomes pemiane . Dogs licensed by other jurisdictions are not exempt from the kennel licensing requirements or from any other provision of this Section. S 9.12 Source: City Code Effective: 4-1-84 Subd. 4. Application. All licenses shall be issued by the City and applications therefore shall be accompanied by a certificate issued by a veterinarian licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota, showing that the dog is vaccinated against rabies tor the duration ot the appli^ for license. Should the rabies vaccination expire prior to the full term ot the license, the owittr is responsible for updating such vaccination. No more than two dog licenses shall be issued to any one person or for any one lot. property or address at any one time unless there shall first have been issued a current residential or commercial kennel license for said pcrsim, lot property or address. Ordinance 93, 2nd Series Adopted: 04-22-91 Ordinance 60, 2nd Series Adopted: 11-14-88 Subd. 5. Fees. All licenses and impounding fees provided tor in this Section shall be issued only upon payment in full of fees fixed and determined in accordance with Cit) Code Section 1.05. License fees shall be due for the full two-year license period except that licenses issued in even-numbered years may be prorated to one-half of the two-year license fee. No other prorating shall be permitted. Subd. 6. Tag Required. All liceased dogs shall wear a collar and have a tag firmly affixed thereto evidencing such license for the current year. A duplicate for a lost tag may be issued by the City upon presentation of the receipt showing the payment of the license fee for the current license period, and payment of the fee for a duplicate license. Tags shall not be transferable, and no refund shall be made on any dog license fee because of leaving the City or death of the dog before the expiration of the license. Subd. 7. License Period. All dog licenses shall be issued and be valid for the whole or unexpired portion of two year periods ^ginning on January 1 of each odd-numbered year. All dog licenses regardless of the date of issuance shall expire on December 31 of each even-numbered year. Dog owners shall apply for license renewal prior to the license expiration date. Subd. 8. Notice of Impounding. Upon the impounding of any dog. the owner shall be notified, or if the owner is unknown, written notice shall be posted for five days at the Citv Hall describing the dog and the place and time ot taking. Subd. 9. Release From Animal Pound. Dogs shall be released to their owners as follows: A. If such dog is owned by a resident of the City, after purchase of a license as aforesaid, and payment of the impounding fees. I I r I I a > I .1*.^.'*^--------- S 9.12 B. If such deg is owned by a person not a resident of the City, after immunization of any such dog for rabies, and payt^ient of the impounding fee for the period for which the dog was impounded. Subd. 10. Animal Pound. Any dog found in the City without a tag. or animal nitining at large, shall be placed in the Animal Pound, and an accurate record of tta time and such placement shall be kept on each animal. Evers animal so placed m the Animal Pound shall be held for redemption bv the ossner for a period of no! less than five an regular business days unless ,1 veterinarian aulhorires its immediate destruction. A'regular business day" ts mtc during sshich the pound is open for business to the public for at least four hours hetsseen 8:00 o clock A M. and 7:00 o'clock P.M. Impoundment records shall be preserved tor a minimum ot m««t» three (3i years and shall show (1) the description of the animal by specie, breed, sex. appro.ximate age. and other distinguishing traits: the location at which Ihe ammal was se^ed- (3) the date of seizure; (4) the name and address of the person from whom ans animal iuee monlhs of a« or over was received; and. (5) the name and address of the person to w hom anv animal three months or age or over was transferred. If unclaimed, such animal shaU be humanely destroyed and the carcass disposed of. unless it is requesied by a lieensed <=ducano^l or scientitic institution under authority ot Minnesota Statute:.. Seetion 35. . . however, that if a tag affixed to the animal, or a statement by the animal s owner after seizu^r specifies that the animal should not be used for research, such animal shaU not c made availaWe to anv such institution but niav be destroyed after the expiration ot the five day ten day pen . Anim.ils raised for food or fiber products shall not be seized or disposed ot withiM pnor PYi^mimtion bv .1 licensed veterinarian pursuant to a warrant issued by a. jud^ Source: City Code Effective: 4-1-84 ^ Subd 11 Other unlawful Acts. It is unlawful for the owner of any dog to; (1) fail to have the license tag issued by the City finnly attached to a collar worn at all times by licensed dog. or (2) own or keep a dog which is dangerous (any such dog which has caused iniurv to persons or property shall be deemed -dangerous;), or (3) intertere with any police olTicer. or other City employee, in the performance of th^ Juty to enforce this Section o (4) fail to prevent dou from defecating in or upon public property or the premises of anothe , or (5) permit solid waste of a dog to accumulaie on owners premises for more than twenty-tour hours. Ordinance 133, 2nd Series Adopted 3-13-95 Subd. 12. Immobilization of Dogs. For the purpose of enforcement of this Section anv wuce officer or dog ciHchef Animal Cont rol Officer or law entorcement ottice r may use a’so-callcd tranquili/er^gun or other instmnieni for the purpose of immobilizing an catching a dog. - «W S 9.12 Subd. 13. Warning of Vicious Dogs. The owTier of any dog known to he of vicious habits shall place in plain view of the entrance to h« their premises a sign no smaller than 12 inches by 14 inches which shall read: "Beware of Vicious Dog" in letters.fUjeasL^ inches in height. Source: City Code Effective: 4-1-84 Subd. 14. Noise. A. Disturbing Peace and Quiet. No person owning, operating, having charge of or occupying, anv building or premises shall keep or allow to be kept My a^a which shall, by any noise unreasonably disturb the peace and qmet of any person in tte ' The phrase 'unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet' shall include, but is [*' ‘ . creation of any noise by anv animal which can be heard by any person, including the Animal CmItoI Officer or law enfomemem officer, from a location outside of the budding or prcm|ses where the animal is being kept and which animal noise occurs repeatedly over at least a five minute period of time with one minute or less lapse or time between each animal noise during the five minute period. B Complaint. Anv person may call or deliver a complaint to the Animl Control Officer stating facts and circumsiances of an alleged violation of this Subsection. TOe Animal Control Officer shall investigate such complaint, ft a violation occurs in t e pres of the Animal Control Officer, a summons may be issued^ If exists which violation did not occur in the presence of the Animal Control Otticer. all rep^s. witness statements and evidence may be submitted to the City Prosecuting Attorney for a formal complaint. Ordinance: 133, 2nd Series Adopted: 3-13-95 06:195.3 . :.l TiiEEnNG REQl'EST FOR COUNCIL ACTION H 4 J995 DATE: July 21. I'^rrY OF ORONQ ITE.M NO.: J Department Approval: Name Tide Administrator Reviewed: Michjd P. Gaffron L . Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Moratorium - Subdivision Applications Involving Requests tor Private Driveways to Serve More than Two Residences This moratorium ordinance is currently being dratted by Mr. Barrett and wilt be distributed at Monday’s meeting. The ordinance has the effect that no applications for subdivisions will be accepted which request approval for use of a private driveway that wilt as a result serve three or more total lots. The intent is to not impede subdivisions which propose to construct conforming private road. The intent is to temporarily preclude the acceptance ot subdivision requests where a variance to the road requirements is proposed. This would, for example, prevent applications such as the Smith subdivision on Fox Street and the Melamed subdivision on Old Crystal Bay Road. It would also prevent applications for splitting off an additional lot from existing parcels at the end of a long private driveway such as those heading westward from North Femdale Road, etc. The length of the moratorium is initially proposed at three months, with an option to extend for an additional nine months. During the moratorium, it is proposed that the Council study whether the existing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning/Subdivision Code sections that set thresholds and standards for private roads and driveways, are consistent and appropriate. Specifically, the Council should determine whether the subdivision code requirement that a private access road intended to serve three or more homes must be platted and built to City private road standards, should be revised. Further, whether minimum standards should be adopted for driveways that are extremely long or which serve more than one user. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION RKQUESTED: Adopt the moratorium ordinance as proposed. Isv ORDINANCE #» 2ND SERIES INTERIM ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO MINN'ESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SI BDIMSION APPROVAL OR OTHER PERMITS ANT> APPROVAL FOR PRFV'ATE DRI^’E^^ AYS WmCU SERVE THREE OR MORE RESIDENCES. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No SECTION I. Stntement of Policy . The City Council finds that the City’ is presently faced with the potential of applications for private driveways which serv-e three or more residences. Such applications may arise in the conte.xt ot new development or of rearrangements of existing developments. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such private drives may be undesirable, and may generate future problems for the safety and welfare of the City residents. The Council, therefore, finds that it is necessary to study the impact of applications under Zoning codes Section 10.02; 10.03, subd. 8; and 10.60. subd. 16; and of applications which may also implicate the City’s Subdivision Code Sections 11.03; 11.10; 11.32; and 11.33 that would allow such roads. The Council further finds that if, as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the city code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has bet.n completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop propeny in order to bring about savings of public and private e.xpenditures and to provide the public guidelines to future City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning permitted land u.se and zoning performance standards, the granting of preliminary approval of subdivision applications or other permits for private driveways serving three or more residences would be contrary to the purpose of the zoning enabling act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.351, et seq. The Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study. Therefore, the Council ’s authority to grant preliminary approval to subdivision applications and for private roads and driveways outside of the subdivision context shall not be exercised during the limited tenns of this Ordinance, except as provided in Section 5. SI’XTION 2. Study. The Council hereby refers this matter to the Planning Commission to initiate a study regarding the implications of its current ordinances governing private driveways to serve three or more residences and the potential need for amendments to the city code to implement the results of that study. Pace 1 of 2 SECTION 3. Restrictions on the Granting of Preliminan' Subdivision Approval and Building Permits. No preliminary subdivision approval shall be given by the Council tor an y subdivision or building permit for which application has not already been made tor private driveways to serve three or more residences. SECTION 4. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire on September 11, 1995, without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council determines that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and the appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the zoning code, have been tinalized. The duration ot this Ordinance may be extended bv adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total ot not more than 18 additional months. SECTION 5. Variances . The Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the comprehensive community management plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it does not adversely impact the health, safety or welfare of the citizens and that it otherwise meets the requirements of the Orono City Code and state law. SECTION 6. Separability'. Eveiy section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision, or part; and it any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not alfect any other section, provision, or part. SECTION 7. Tliis Ordinance shall be published in the THE PIONEER and i HE LAKER and shall be effective immediately. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the , 1995, by a vote of_____ayes and _____nays. day of ATl'EST: Dorothv il llin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., M ;,* r Paee 2 of 2 />- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July?fM995 ITEM NO ■■// \r ip iDepartment Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Michael F. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator —\ Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Moratorium - Highway 12 Corridor The City Attorney is drafting a moratorium ordinance for the area bounded by Willow Drive, Old Crystal Bay Road, Highway 12 and County Road 6. The ordinance will be distributed at Monday’s meeting. The effect of the moratorium is that no applications tor subdivision, zoning (CUP/variance), rezoning. PUD or building permits for property within the affected area shall be accepted during the moratorium. The moratorium is intended to last 6 months, with option to e.xtend for an additional 18 months. During the moratorium , it is intended that Council study whether the conclusions reached in the 1987 amendment affecting this area, in conjunction with the zoning code provisions (10.45 "B-6 Highway Commercial District"; 10.52 "Special Requirements for Rezoning in the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area"; and 10.53 "Planned Unit Development (PUD)") provide for appropriate fumre development of the affected area in light of a number of factors. These factors include purchase and use of significant portions of the affected area by the City and School District for non-residential purposes. MivDOT ’S use of a 3-acre parcel for stormwater ponding, as well as uncertainty about the future route of Highway 12 and potential increase in the acreage of wetland in the affected area beyond those originally identified in the amendment as a result of the Wetland Conservation Act. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the moratorium ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the moratorium ordinance V ORDLNANCE #, 2ND SERIES INTERIM ORDINANCE PLTISUANT TO MLNNTSOTA STATUTE SECTION 462.355, SUBDmSION 4, PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDiVISION APPROVAL, ZONING (CLT/VARIANCE) APPROVAL, REZONTNG, PUD OR BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL WITH l N THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR AS DEFINED HERELN. THE cm' OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No. SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The Cit> Council finds that the City is presently faced wiUi the potential of applications for subdivision, rezoning, zoning (CUP/Variance), PUD or building pennits for property within the Highway 12 Corridor. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be approved may be undesirable because the current ordinances may not be consistent with the City s zoning and development goals. The Council, therefore, finds that it is neeessaiy to study the impact of development under current ordinances to deiennine whether they tultill the underlying purposes of the City's land use and zoning provisions. The Council further finds that if, as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has been completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property in order to bring about savings of public and private expenditures and to provide the public guides to future City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning permitted land use and zoning perfonnance standards, the granting of preliminarv' approval of subdivision applications, zoning (CUP/Variance) applications, rezoning applications. PUD or building pemuts tor property within the Ilichway 12 Corridor would be contrary to the purpose ot the zoning enabling act, .Minnesota Statute Section 462.351, ei seq. The Council further finos that it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study SECTION 2. Highway 12 Corridor Defined. As used in the Ordinance, the Highway 12 Corridor shall be defined as the property within the City of Orono bounded by U.S. Highway 12 on the south. County Road 6 on the north. Willow Drive on the east, and Old Crystal Bay Road on the west. SECTIO.N 3. Smdv. The Council hereby refers this matter to the Planning Commission to initiate a study regarding the implications of the potential need tor amendments to the City code to implement the results of that .study. Page 1 of 2 SECTION 4. Restrictions on the Granr^n? of Preliminary Subdivision_ArprovaL Znniny fCUP/Variance) Approval. Re£oning. PUD or Building PerrnjtjL. No preliminary subdivision approval. Zoning (CUP/Variance) approval. Rezoning. PUD or Building Permit approval shall be given by the Council for any property within the Highway 12 Corridor as defiiKd herein. SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire on Januaiy 22. 1996, without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council determi.ies that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary' revisions of the zoning code, have been finalized. The duration ot this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total ot not more than 18 additional months. SECTION 6. Variances. The Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a oroposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it does not adversely impact the health, safety’ or welfare of the citizens and that t otherwise meets the requirements of the Orono City Code and slate law. SECTION 7. Separability. Every section, provision, or pait of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provision, or part thereo* r action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not atfeci any other section, pro • or part. SFCnON 8. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER ^ effective immediately. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this _____, 1995, by a vote of____ayes and_____nays. day of t\TTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callalian, Jr., Mayor Page 2 of 2 request FOR COIIN’CIL ACTION 2 4 19^5 DATE: July ORONQ ITEM NO.: f S' Department Approval: Name John R. Gr'hau'dsoo Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed: /^/7 Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Third Partv and Subrecipient Agreements Attached for review and approval is a resolution authorizing the Mayor and to sign the third party agreement and the subrecipient agreement for the year XXI CDBG IW3. »*ecommendaiion to approve Resolution #____authorizing \hs Mayor and City Administrator to sign the third party arel subrecipient agreements for year XXI 1995 CDBG. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve Resolution #_____authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the third party and subrecipient agreements for year XXI 1995 CDBG. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPLN COUNTY FOR 1995 (YTAR XXD ITIBAN HENNEPIN COUTSTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGR.AM WHEREAS, the City of Orono has executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for the purpose of participating in the 1995 (Year XXI) Urban Hennepin County’ Community Development Blctck Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is the recipient of an annual grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposes of the program, and the city is a subrecipient under the program and receives a share of the grant; and WHEREAS, program regulations require that the City and County execute a Subrecipient Agreement and appropriate Third Party Agreement, which sets forth the specific implementation processes for activities to be undertaken with program funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Administrator to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 24th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ilallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor CC'r-. JUl £77;-.-> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Julv 20. 1995 ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name Roa Moorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Descs otion: Paving of Rear Yard of Public Works Garage Area The attached letter from the Public Works Director outlines a recommendation regarding the paving of the rear yard of the Public Works garage area to minimize the cost of maintaining the yard area, and to enable the area to best accommodate the types of activities for which it is used. It is recommended the yard area be paved with a bituminous surface. The cost of this project is $7,500. The contractor performing the paving of North Brown Road has agreed to install the bituminous pavement for the same unit cost as the Brown Road Project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the paving of the rear yard of the Public Works garage area at a cost of $7,500 to be funded from the Building Fund. TO:Ron Moorsc, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gcrhardson, Public Works Director DATE;July 3, 1995 SUBJECT: Public Works - Paving Yard .Area During the facilm- cons.mciion it was discovered that the rear yard area was not go.ng to be caved' It was determined at that time due to budgeting restramts not to pursue the paving bu rextendtL concrete aprons by the rear overhead door by an additional 6 . This was denied due to budgetary restraints. We have experienced two full years of activity for that area and have concluded that the area should be paved for the following reasons; 1.It is the main staging area for spring and fall cleanups and the spring and tall Ud waste drop off area. When cleaning up after the above activities debris and oiher objects cannot be picked up due to the coarse surface leaving glass, meta . wood leaves and brush, some of which can cause damage to tires and equipment. 2. consequently carried into the building causing more frequent cleanup. 3. snow plowing, etc. 1 would like to take advantage of the bituminous bid prices for Brown Road to complete the paving this year. The amount budgeted for this expenditure was $7,500 in the 1995 budget. JIJL ? 4 1995REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 0»m ,jqj W«ONO ' ITEM NO: Department Approval: Nane Dorothy Hall in Tide City Clerk Item Description: Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Licenses Special Events Permit Keith Waters & Associates. Inc 2900 Deer Run Trail Parade of Homes Open Hou e 9/9/95 through 9/24'95 3-8 p.m. weekdays noon-6 p.m. weekends Tony Eiden Company 2630 Countryside Drive West Parade of Homes Open House 9/9/95 through 9/23/95 3-9 p.m. weekdays noon-6 p.m. weekd«fSj y' COU’NCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses DATE:7-20-95 TO;Dorothy Hallin^ City Clerk FROM;Gary Cheswick, Acting Chief of Police SUBJECT: Keith Waters & Assoc., Inc. Parade of Homes In checking our files we find no previous events which caused any problems or need for the police to respond. The address of 2900 Deer Run Trail is a private road and appears to be suitable for the expected traffic. I would therefore recommend approval of this Special Event Permit. t m fPfn* ^ —f 1 . parades 6 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Perr.it #:_Fee: S50.00 Phone Nunber: Name:uriTU WATrg*^ X '' *■ ' r^oiv/c: i in Address: lC3-i0 VIKING DRIVE ?^110 EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 55344 City, State, "ip: Location of Parade or Event: *)/) ^ ^ /C U t\i (/ Parson(s) and/or Orcani =arion(s) Handling the Event:.. Date of Event:c7--r y/<?i Hours of Event : a - ^ 1 / Reason or Purpose:- - - - - -^ P Amount: /,? insurance Company:. s^niiitted wit;g;;”r!nsSrIngr cert"ktt»%o b: sTuIitted with this application I am aware of all applicable °l^2lso^ag!:se'^to hol^d^the City of special events and will abide b arise directly or indirectly g^g^tSe^il^i^F^eViafevent^ap nroved b/ the granting of this perr.1 . Date Signature Approved :Denied:Bv : Remarks: -r ••pn-oI 4 ft ^ f • mm i ^I,- ^ t t '•* - -<• w.'-.i.N'u -c r*‘ ••LC-i*u -• V • 5J.-V —V wv.--• y - DATE:7-20-95 TO:Dorothy Hallin# City Clerk FROM:Gary Cheswick, Acting Chief of Police SUBJECT Eiden Construction In checking our files we find no previous events which caused any problems or need for the police to respond. The address of 2630 Countryside Dr. West is a private road and appears to be suitable for the expected traffic. I would therefore recommend approval of this Special Event Permit. .fV ”■ i.-»* ff- r^V Mraueti m i> > . ^ m r f'w mm r r / ^ r - ^ S *1'' s ^ ^ ** ij ■ -9*^ /»ir > *• •• 7/H/9S PR: a PRREGOR -57 EMP • NAME 72204554 71518040 74563339 76921819 71840871 75443862 68113870 72503991 ,69526026 .75989721 I6882101S .68622840 i/2529007 i68701868 ^69686562 168420832 174667812 175380151 177500666 175444249 177463877 171569863 173141624 177647279 171848180 172500574 21262417 75344512 80643542 77561040 70987727 77700023 34506281 77028779 73108428 68909535 767837.51 76866274 70700901 69648107 71487919 74167795 75382983 ,73746173 73609629 ,68320409 ,70566529 .69629194 175569177 172563051 174663296 170704904 175505292 168629488 177881539 XLCH, JEROME S. ANDERSON. BRUCB L BOBZIEN, SUE A BORIS, SCOTT W BOSMA, JAMIt L. BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CALLAGHAN, -ERBMIAH CHFSWICK, GARY B CORNICr, JAMES L OEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON, DOUGLAS J ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH, DAN T GAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON, JOHN R GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, JOHNSON, JOSTROM, KARNITZ, CAROLE BRADLEY P FOREST J RICKY D KUEHN, THOMAS M MABU3TH, JEANNE A MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MELTON, NEIL W. MILLER. CHRISTOPHER MOORSE, RONALD J MOROWC2YNSKI, JAMES NELSON, DAVID D- OAS, DANIEL O OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OLSON, JOHN C. OMAN, LYLE E PALMER, GREGORY A PERSELL, WILLIAM R. PETERSON, JACK W QUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS, JOHN A RUTHER, ALVIN C. SCHCENHOFF, JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S THOMTON, MARK R TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG, BRUCE L VEE, LINDA S WECKJ1AN, STEPHEN J DPT YTD GROSS CURRENT GROSS 93 436.05 82.65 31 28772.24 1974.77 31 16168.87 1071.20 31 18607.85 1283.96 12 8982.15 585.66 42 24840.00 .656.00 35 2049.37 361.73 31 26994.69 2150.85 31 27842.02 2094.97 31 27970.04 2105.29 31 26053.96 1611.02 93 419.25 120.25 31 24062.00 1450.36 31 24597.52 1796.1’ 33 23291.20 1555.52 42 35188.50 2357.72 42 19704.30 1163.02 12 20064.19 1340.00 42 18544 23 1143.68 31 0517.50 838.86 12 16047.73 1096.31 31 75576.82 1692.10 93 1015.00 176.90 31 2451.76 336.63 M 31 6046.79 547.43 15 34265.97 2288 .49 33 29169.03 1948.08 93 2014 .80 255.20 31 25252.77 1907.29 31 2005.76 179.53 15 17183.61 1180.32 12 38141.59 2449.44 31 25930.33 1889.50 35 443.75 170.43 93 2033.60 365.80 42 18915.94 1143.67 92 19925.es 1143 .66 15 14662.04 1017.69 33 23791 . 18 1555.51 42 16711.17 1 368 . 84 31 5274 .66 179.53 93 2821.50 367.65 92 22388.23 1772 .46 92 18432.66 1165.13 93 852 .60 139.20 93 424 .65 65.55 31 18602.96 1310.30 42 19732.83 1143.68 ■D 93 20064 . 16 1340.00 31 24269.00 lt.60.43 F 31 25363.54 1690.08 3^24172.76 It 11.51 33 19662.15 1340.00 12 16471.20 1071.20 33 19603.96 1242.18 65,454.69 TV- ,I cotmciL CaiBCK (TO %CHECK REGISTER Thu Jul 4 CHECK DATE CHEOC AMOUNT0335471995/07/07 $5,421.00$5,621.00*1995/07/07 $2,899.691995/07/07 $10,146.75033548$13,046.44* 1995/07/07 $57,454.62 033549 $57,454.62* 1995/07/07 $1,490.00 033550 $1,490.00* 1995/07/07 $155.50 033551 $155.50* 1995/07/07 $174.50 Q33552 $174.50* 1995/07/07 $100.00 033553 $100.00* 1995/07/07 $420.00 033554 $420.00* 1995/07/07 $3,112.12 033555 $3,112.12* 1995/07/07 $110.00 033556 $110.00* 1995/07/07 $100.00 033557 $100.00* 1995/07/07 $156.45 033558 $156.45* 1995/07/07 $4,835.02 033559 $4,835.02* 1995/07/07 $3,820.51 1995/07/07 $5,065.08 033560 $8,885.59* 1995/07/07 $29.00 033561 $29.00* $95,690.24 1995 23:57:40VENDOR Page 1 •DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVOICESAVINGS N/H fc TRANSP 9999-2030 002980 cmCITY SHARE FICA,MEDC 9999-2032 002973 OHFIT,PICA,MEDCR H/H 9999-2030 002973 OH NET PAYROLL 9999-2030 002976 OH DEP COMP W/H 9999-2030 002983 OH THOMTON #00266780 9999-2030 002979 OH SKREEN #00262310 9999-2030 002978 OH DEP CCWP H/H 9999-2030 002982 OH UNION DUES H/H 9999-2C30 002977 OH STATE TAX H/H 9999-2030 002974 OH DBF COMP H/H 9999-2030 002984 OH DBF COMP H/H 9999-2030 002905 OH DEP COMP H/H 9999-2030 002907 OH DEP C .r H/H 9999-2030 002986 OH PERA H/H 9999-2030 002975 OHPERA CITY SHARE 9999-2031 002975 OH CHARITY DONATIONS W/9999-2030 002901 OH PEBSCO/OBRA PERA PERA UNITED WAY COOIiCIL CHECK SUMHARY Thu Jul f 1555 23:57:43irnro • 999 payroll clearing Pago 1$95,490.34$95,490.24 COmClL CHBCK REGISTER Pri Jul 21 1995 00:59:34CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT • 0175-4355 INVOICE002989 PO NUM.Pag* 1 MANUAL OH033555 033555 033557 033550 033559 033570 033571 033572 033573 033574 033575 033576 033577 033578 1995/07/241995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $60.00$60.00*$103.00 $103.00 $206.00* $9.51 $5.30 $14.81* $66.54 $66.54* $130.52 $130.52 $130.52 $65.26 $456.82* $16.67 $16.67* $250.00 $275.95 $525.95* $70.44 $168.58 $293.89 $532.91* $1,030.95 $1,030.95* $274.23 $274.23* $63.32 $63.32* $5,671.00 $5,671.00* $22,260 50 $22,260.50* $163.00 $163.00* AHEMASPLOND COFFEE ASPLUNO COFFEE AT6T INFO SYSTEM ATfcT INFO SYSTEM AUGIES MOBILE CHEF BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BIG A AUTO PARTS BLACKOWIAK 6 SON BLACKOWIAK 6 SON BLACKOWIAK 6 SONS BLACKOWIAK k SONS BLACKOWIAK k SONS BRAUN INTERTEC ENG BUDGET PRINTING CHUNKS GARAGE CONP-TOMCHBCKCOFFEE COFFEE JUNE SERVICE JUNE SERVICE SANDWICHES FOR RESAL JULY-BEDERWOOD PARK JULY-HACKBERRY PARK JULY-SUMMIT BEACH JULY-GOLF COURSE MISC PARTS SPRING CLEANUP SPRING CLEANUP JUNE SERVICE JUNE SERVICE JUNE SERVICE CMKX-93-0163 RECEIPT BOOKS TRANSMISSION CHECK » CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H k TRANSF CITY OF LONG LAKE COCA COLA VENDING 3RD QTR FIRE PROTECT POP FOR RESALE 0129-4210 0099-4210 0099-4320 0549-4320 0591-4802 0290-4331 0290-4331 0290-4331 0590-4331 0590-4232 0295-4348 0295-4348 0590-4343 0099-4343 0290-4343 0651-4306 0129-4322 0129- 4341 9999-2030 0130- 4315 0591-4802 71835 71835 002998 OQ30QO 26081 BI052207 BI05220S BI052206 BI052204 5271 175935 175934 176261 176205 176231 062834 1 035 / 6396 003024 003010 4563804 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH i:.ICIL -CK KBSIiTSt Fri Jul 21 1995 06:59:34 Page 3wSSmmCHECK DATE CHECK JU40UNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 1 INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL1995/0T/24 $18 7.48 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO AUO INS 9999-2030 7O095OOOO227C OH0335791995/07/24 $505.84$493.52*COLONIAL LIFE INS CO AUG INS 0129-4152 7089500002276 OH 033580 1995/07/24 $122.50 $122.50* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR f2 SOFTENER 0S49-434S 3676 OH 033581 1995/07/24 $2.55 $2.55* DOHMEN, NICHOLAl REFUND OVERPAYMENT 9473-1191 002993 OH 033582 1995/07/24 $204.00 $204.00* DORADUS CORP SIREN MAINT 0175-4342 340795 OH 033583 1995/07/24 $214.05 $214.05* DOYLE INC MOWER PARTS 0290-4342 5575 OH 033584 1995/07/24 $115.49 $115.49* EARL F ANDERSON ASSC SIGN FOR G.C.0590-4232 142327 OH 033585 1995/07/24 $224.70 $224.70* EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER FOR RESALE 0591-4015 543059 OH 03358S 1995/07/24 $6.52 $6.52* ENG REPRO SYSTEMS PLAT MAP REDUCTIONS 0099-4322 134893 OH 033587 1995/07/24 $392.16 $392.16* ENGLISH IRVING TUITION REIMBURSEMEN 0129-435i 003003 OH 1995/07/24 $401.64 FEED RITE CONTROLS CHLORINE 0549-4234 64232 OH 033508 1995/07/24 $20.00 $421.64* FEED RITE CONTROLS CYLINDER CHARGE 0569-4234 27077 OH 1995/07/24 $2,876 .46 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA,MLDC 9999-2032 003018 OH 033569 1995/07/24 $9,586.92 $12,463.40* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIT,FICA,MEDCR W/H 9999-2030 003018 OH 033590 1995/07/24 $37,444.20 $37,444.20* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL 9999-2030 003021 OH 1995/07/24 $127.32 G t K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0129-4343 542904 OH 1995/07/24 $39.27 G 6 K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0099-4343 542899 OH1995/07/24 $39.27 G 6 K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0099-4343 542898 OH 1995/07/24 $2.60 G it K SERVICES STEFFENHAGEN 0590-4221 539113 OH 1095/07/24 $15.49 G it K SERVICES RATHBUN, OUAST 0569-4221 539115 OH 033591 1995/07/24 $73.86 $297.81* G 6 K SERVICES STREET EMPLOYEES 0249-4221 539114 OH 033592 1995/07/24 $44.94 $44.94* GALL'S INC.ELECTRIC GUN LOCKS 0129-4221 501518340101 OH ,mOOWCILCHECK REGISTER Prl Jul 21CHBCX IK> CHBCR DATE CHECK AMOUNT1995/07/24 $35.021995/07/24 $26.441995/07/24 $•.•9033593$70.55* 1995/07/24 $94.00 1995/07/24 $98.00 033594 $196.00* 1995/07/24 $1,490.00 033595 $1,490.00* 1995/07/24 $170.74 1995/07/24 $1,846.44 1995/07/24 $1,154.02 1995/07/24 $301.00 1995/07/24 $301.00 033595 $3,773.24* 1995/07/24 $757.84033597$757.44* 1995/07/24 $7.25033598$7.25* 1995/07/24 $155.50 033599 $155.50* 1995/07/24 $174.50 033600 $174.50* 1995/07/24 $200.00 033601 $200.00* 1995/07/24 $100.00 033602 $100.00* 1995/07/24 $900.00 031603 $900.00* 1995/07/24 $22.30 033604 $22.30* 1995/07/24 $2,327.78 033605 $2,327.78* 1995/07/24 $30.00 033606 $30.00* 1995/07/24 $24.60 1995 <00:59:34 Page 3VENDORCESCRIPTIOBACCOUNT iGENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS 0249-42320129-42320590-4232 002996002996002996 OHOHOH GOPHER STATE ClIECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL JUNE SERVICE JUNE SERVICE 0549-4306 0569-4306 5060531 5060531 OH OH GREAT WEST LIFE ASS’JRA DEF CCWP W/H 99.^9-2030 003027 OH GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEAITH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS 0174-4151 0129-4151 9999-2030 0590-4151 0249-4151 3730468 3730468 3730460 3730468 3730468 OH OH OH OH OH HACK CHEMICAL CO REPAIR WTR TESTER 0549-4345 147820 OH HASEMAN, CAROLE MILEAGE REIMS 0039-4381 003016 OH HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPFOR THOMTON #C0266780 9999-2030 003023 OH HKNNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR SKREEN 8C0262310 9999-2030 003022 OH lACP lACP TRAINING 0129-4356 003002 OH ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 003026 OH INFRATECH TELEVISE KELLY AVE P 0569-4306 95327 OH LAKEVILLE PRODUCTS BEEF JERKEY 0591-4802 003007 OH LAWN DETAILERS INC.JUNE BILLING 0290-4343 1229 OH LEAGUE OF MN CITIES SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 0039-4380 2046 OH LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE DISC SPACE 0569-4355 AR0695 OH CCXmClL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jul 21 1JS5 00:59:3«Pag* 4HECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOT DESCRIPTICMI ACCOUNT ff INVOICE PO HUM.MANUAL19R5/07/24 $2,205.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE SERVICES 0099-4352 AR0695 OH1995/07/24 $10.54 LOGIS * SUITE 300 JUNE DISC SPA.J 0549-4355 AR0695 OH1995/07/24 $793.93 UX3IS - SUITE 300 JUNE DISC SPACE 0129-4355 AR0695 OH1995/07/24 $€£7.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE SERVICES 0129-4352 AR0695 OH1995/07/24 $226.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE SERVICES 0549-4352 AR0695 OH1995/07/24 $526.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE SERVICES 0569-4352 AR0695 OH 033607 1995/07/24 $376.99 $4,830.06* LOGIS - SUITE 300 JUNE DISC SPACE 0099-4355 AR0695 OH 1995/07/24 $30.00 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPM BLADE SHARPENING 0590-4342 1061 OH 1995/07/24 $25.19 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPM REPAIR GREENS MOWER 0590-4342 1109 OH 033608 1995/07/24 $17.46 $72.65* LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPM FILTERS 0249-4232 8953 OH 033609 1995/07/24 $426.95 $426.95* LeROY KESLER CONSTRUCT BLDG PERMIT OVERPAYM 9001-3131 003008 OH 033610 1995/07/24 $53.65 $53.65* MABUSTH-JEATJNE JUNE MILEAGE 0174-4381 003013 OH 033611 1995/07/24 $36.22 $36.22* MINN COMM JULY SERVICE 0249-4221 70660C07959 OH 033612 1995/07/24 $13.50 $13.50* MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN 0129-4232 RI06950856 OH 033613 1995/07/24 $2,855.50 $2,855.50* MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE STATE TAX W/H 9999-2030 003019 OH 033614 1995/07/24 $55.00 $55.00* MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 003020 OH 033615 1995/07/24 $100.00 $100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 003029 OH 033616 1995/07/24 $3,398.55 $3,398.55* MN STATE TREASURER 2ND OTR BLDG SURCHAR 9001-2222 003009 OH 033617 1995/07/24 $64.99 $64.99* MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES SHOES-MOROWCZYNSKI 0129-4221 003012 OH 1995/07/24 $134.56 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0290-4232 003006 OH 1995/07/24 $38.79 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS ca.49- . ’32 003006 OH 1995/07/24 $75.38 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0290-4231 003006 OH 1995/07/24 $69.12 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0129-4232 003006 OH 1995/07/24 $62.61 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0590-4232 0C3006 OH 1995/07/24 $8.25 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0549-4234 003006 OH 1995/07/24 $14.37 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0549-42.003006 OH 033618 1995/07/24 $122.02 $525.10* NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0569-4234 003006 OH COWCIL CHECK REGISTER Pri Jul 21 1995 CHBCK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00:59:34VENDOR Tag* 5DESCRIPTION NORTH M£H(%IAL MEDICAL PALL PTAC TRAINING RCHITH STAR TURF INC. REPAIR GREENS MOWER O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE AU FIX FLAT OBERHAUSER, LOUIS REFUND OVERPAYMENT PEBSCO/OBRA DBF CCWP H/H PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYO DBF COMP H/H ACCOUNT i INVOICB PO NUM.MANUAL0129-4356 003001 OH 0590-4342 0030M OH 0590-4342 002999 OH 9673-1191 002994 OH 9999-2030 003031 OH 9999-2030 O0303O OH 9999-2030 003020 OH 9999-2031 003020 OH 0185-4232 002997 OH 0129-4322 001 OH 0099-4322 190 OH 0099-4322 191 OH 0099 4340 109431 OH 0129-4341 002995 OH 012‘»-4'»41 S053 OH 0591-4802 15131 OH 0590-4232 003004 OH 0129-4210 3761075 OH 0129-4210 3760631 OH 0129-4210 3761210 OH 0059-4307 003005 OH 033S19 033S20 033621 033622 C33623 033624 033625 033626 033627 033628 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $1,330.00$1,330.00* $222.33 $222.33* $11.77 $11.77* $26.96 $26.96* $229.26 $229.26* $1,085.00 $1,085.00* $3,578.64 $4,688.96 $8,267.60* $26.33 $26.33* $45.92 $53.38 $32.76 $132.06* $98.41 $98.41* $20.60 $20.60 PERA PERA PET CLIPS PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PERA W/H PERA CITY SHARE DOG SUPPLIES 91 SQUAD FOR SALE LAND USE APPS PLANK DRAINAGE 033629 $41.20* 1995/07/24 $97.20 REED VENDING 033630 $97.20* 1995/07/24 $41.90 RICKS; SUPERVALU 033631 $41.90* 1995/07/24 $7.01 RITZ CAMERA 1995/07/24 $28.17 RITZ CAMERA 1995/07/24 $8.61 RITZ CAMERA 033632 $43.79* 1995/07/24 $6,296.62 ROLF E ERICKSON PRECISION BUSINESS SYS REPAIR TRANSCRIBER PRO TIRE 6 EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #174 T OIL CHANGE #171 CANDY FOR RESALE MISC SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING AUGUST SERVICE COUMCIL CHBCK REGISTER Pri Jul 21 CHBCK ao CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT033633$6,296.62*033634 1995/07/24 $80.00$80.00* 033635 1995/07/24 $18.77 $18.77* 033636 1995/07/24 $190.00 $190.00* 033637 1995/07/24 $61.54 $61.54* 033638 1995/07/24 $375.52 $375.52* 033639 1995/07/24 $262.50 $262.50* 033640 1995/07/24 $167.42 $167.42* 033641 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $229.45 $151.96 $77.00 $466.65 $925.06* 033642 1995/07/24 $29.00 $29.00* 033643 1995/07/24 $45.82 $45.82* 033644 1995/07/24 $27.69 $27.69* 033645 1995/07/24 $253.54 $253.54* 033646 1995/07/24 $2,650.00 $2,650.00* 033647 1995/07/24 $29.45 $29.45* 033648 1995/07/24 $1,414.72 $1,414.72* 1995 0O:S9:34VENDORRUTTGERS LODGE SCHARBER k SONS INC SCOTT BEACK ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT STAR TRIBUNE TRANS-ALARM INC. ultimate awards UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFOR.MS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNITED WAY VEE LIN DESCRIPTIONAMBM-TOHCHECK WHEEL FOR JOHN DEERE GOLF BALLS LOADER STROBE LIGHTS AD FOR LPGA CLASSIC REPAIR ALARM SYSTEM SHIRTS FOR EMPLOYEES COAT-FISCHENICH UNIFORM-KARNIT2 SHIRT-MELTON JOHNSON UNIFORM CHARITY DONATIONS W/ MILEAGE REIMS. VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMEN SAFETY GLOVES VILLAGE CHEVROLET REAR BRAKES #426 WAYZATA-CITY OF 3RD QTR FIRE PROTECT WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIR TIRE REPAIR #426 WM MUELLER 6 SONS PARK IMPROV. ACCOUNT I0175-4356 0590- 4342 0591- 4800 0249-4232 0590-4323 0129-4342 0590-4221 0129-4221 0129-4221 0129-4221 0129-4221 9999-2030 0039-4381 0569-4221 0249-4232 0130-4315 024 9-4341 0395-4530 INVOICE002988 003015 15408 S131243 002990 78219 563'' 497384 497672 109575 497554 003025 003017 511449 002991 002992 82584 003011 Pag* 6PO NUM. MANUALOH QH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Prl Jul 21 1995 00:59:34 Page 7 •CHECK MO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL0336521995/07/241995/07/241995/07/24 $44,'/40.00 $27,799.30 $28,463.20 $101,002.50*AMERICAN NATL BANK AMERICAN NATL BANK AMERICAN NATL BANK INT DUE 3/1/95 INT DUE 8/1/95 INT DUE 8/1/95 0912-46200910-46200909-4620 003045003044003044 OHOHOH 033653 1995/07/24 $21,630.77 $21,630.77* BANYON DATA SYSTEMS IN SOFTWARE 6 HARDWARE 0629-4560 3512 OH 033C54 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $30.80 . $29.00 $59.80* BRINKHAUS-JACK BRINKHAUS-JACK MGNT SEMINAR MILEAGE MILEAGE REIMS. 0249-4356 0249-4381 003040 003040 OK OH 033655 1995/07/24 $19.19 $19.19* BUDGET PRINTING FOLLOW UP FORMS 0129-4322 10490 OH 033656 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $63,368.91 $14,665 60 $78,034.51* BUFFALO BITUMINOUS : BUFFALO BITUMINOUS : INC INC PAYMENT 84 PAYMENT #4 0357-4532 0360-4532 003035 003035 OH OH 033657 1995/07/24 $182.13 $182.13* CHUNKS GARAC.E CLEAN EMISSION, SERV 0129-4341 64 91 OH 033658 1995/07/24 $194.89 $194.89* COCA COLA VENDING POP FOR RESALE 0591-4802 4617^00 OH 033659 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 1995/07/24 $2.55 $24.25 $.85 $111.22 $2.58 $2.07 $21.67 $12.75 $75.91 $253.85* COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL MFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE AUG INSURANCE 0069-4152 0039-4152 0590-4152 9999-2030 0569-4152 0549-4152 0249-4152 v.174-4152 0129-4152 003036 003036 003036 003036 003036 003036 003036 003036 003036 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 033660 1995/07/24 $624.70 $624.70* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR L.S. #14,16,0569-4344 3666 OH 033661 1995/07/24 $549.40 $549.40* CT SYSTEMS REPLACE SOLENOID #2 0549-4345 1983 OH 033662 1995/07/24 $225.00 $225.00* DON RATH REPAIR MONUMENT 0651-4520 003038 OH 033663 1995/07/24 $10.95 $10.95* EARL W DAY «. SONS COUPLING 0590-4343 37158 OH 033664 1995/07/24 $68.)6 $68.16* ESS BROTHERS k SONS CATCH BASIN 0249-4233 2013 OH PO 1 MAMTT&T•1. Pi/\riUALi9001-3134 003039 OH0549-4234 157710 OH0549-4345 003037 OH0590-4210 41889 OH 0590-4342 15270 0590-4220 15270 OH OH 0395-4530 003034 OH C6WC1L CHECK RECITER Yri Jul 21 1995 CHECK MO CHECK DATE CHEC./. AMOUNT 00:59:34VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT n INVOICE PO NUM.Pag* 9 MANUAL1995/07/24 $5.10 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 37613760336781995/07/24 $2.71$7.81*RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 37618220336'^9 1995/07/24 $24.05$24.05*STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 0039-4210 0030320336601995/07/24 $811.53$811.53*TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS SIGN FOR CITY HALL B 0651-4520 29471995/07/24 $17.75 US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS 0549-4355 0030431995/07/24 $26.63 US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS 0569-4355 003043 1995/07/24 $45.94 US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS 0549-4320 003043 1995/07/24 $133.12 US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS 0099-4355 003043 033681 1995/07/24 $55.66 $279.10* US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS 0549-4320 003043 OHOHOHOHOHOHOH OH OH $365,630.12 CCXHfCIL CHECK 8UMHMY Fri Jul 21 1995 00:59:40PUHD i FUND • FUND » FUND • FUND •fond •FUND • FUND N FUND # FUND # 001112114115 34€ 423672673674 999 GENERAL FUND PARK FUND IMP/EQUIP 0/L FD BLDG CAP 0/L PD 92 IMP BD D/S FD MUN ST AID CO/FD WTR OPERATING FD SNR OPERATING FD G/C OPERATING PD PAYROLL CLEARING $54,039.62 $2,464.72 $21,630.77 $2,067.48 $44,740.00 $78,034.51 $32,110.89 $55,830.46 $2,606.77 $72,104.90 $365,630.12 Pag» 1 information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING JUL ? 4 1996 CITY Of ORON OF TO: FROM DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator July 21. 1995 SUBJECT: Update Regarding Health Concerns Related to the Nehring Propert>* at 1972 Shadywood Road The City has had ongoing dealings with Mr. Nehring regarding his feeding of ducks and regarding the general condition of his property. Most recently a concern has arisen regarding rats on the property. I have attached a memo from Tom Barrett providing a brief history of the duck feeding issue. Concerns re^ vding the Nehring property have most recently been initiated by Carol and John Weiland, who are neighbors of Mr. Nehring. Lyle Oman, the City’s chief code enforcement officer, and a staff person from the State Health Depanment will meet with the Weilands and inspect the Nehring property the week of July 24 to determine actions to be taken to address the concerns. PQPHAM HAIK MEMQRANPU\t 3300 riper /•tfrav Tower 222 Souil) Nin'Ji Street Minncapolii, Mlnncicu 55402 (612) 333-4g00 TO:Ron Moorse a FRO.M:Thomas Ba^tt ^ RE:Feeding the ducks DATE:July 20, 1995 Ron, as we discussed l*ic legal history of this matter is not an easy one. Mr Nehring was criminally charged originally with violating the ordinance, and found guilty. His sentence was stayed by the court on the condition that he stop feeding the ducks for twelve months. He obeyed the order, but when it expired he resumed feeding the ducks. He was criminally charged again, demanded a jury trial, and after a three of four day trial, was acquitted by the jury. He continued to feed the ducks. The City then commenced a civil suit, which was denied by the. court after some consideration. I understand that Mr. Nehring has continued to feed the ducks and that the question has again arisen what can be denc about it. llie most diflicult part of this is that one needs to work against the perception that this is a harmless activity, and that the City is overreaching itself when it tries to forbid or regulate. If the City wants to try again, my instinct here is to try another civil suit, with a strong investment in dcnionstraUng not just the violation of the ordinance, hut the harm which this violation causes. We should di.scu.s6 this turiher. 082/220M70I 7/2(V93 TO: INFORMATION ONXY Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:July 19. 1995 SUBJECT: MCWD Long Lake Improvement Project - Update The Watershed District is proceeding with the permit approval process tor the various elements of the Long Lake Improvement Project. To-date, they have: Completed a 24 page Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Distributed copies'^to 21 local,state and federal government entities (sec transmittal letter. Exhibit D). Met with Jeanne and me regarding the CUP/variance application requirements. Met with the City of Medina and encountered significant resistance to the proposed Deer Hill Road detention pond in Medina. MCWD has not yet submitted a formal application to the City of Orono, although the plans have been submitted and Bonestroo has a copy tor review. As noted above. MCWD is proposing a pond in Medina that was not part of the original plan. The pond on the Pearce property in Orono has been reduced from 5.5 acres to a surface area of 2.5 acres. The pond in Medina is proposed to have a surface area of 6.1 acres. We are advised that MCWD’s agreement with Pearce does not allow expansion of the Orono pond whether or not the Medina pond is built. The following exhibits are attached: A - Project location map B - County Road 6 pond, 1" = I00’ C - Deer Hill pond, r = 100’ D - EAW transmittal letter E - Letter from MCWD's Andrew Syverson 7/5/95 F - Memos/correspondence regarding Bonestroo & Associates review of EAW for City of Medina G - Orono staff response to EAW 7/18/95 Additional exhibits have not been attached but which can be copied for Council review if you wish, include: - Environmental .Assessment Worksheet - DNR request for review and comments re: NICWD s permit application to DNR/Corps of Engineers Staff is led to believe that MCWD will make a formal CUP/variance application for review by the Planning Commission at their August meeting. In light of Bonestroo ’s comments regarding the Medina project (Exhibit F). Council may wish to take a greater role in the review process. ch '-r-jv; J TTJ i c .-:^V - ci.l^-i (r .. ■• 7 ^ \ r;/' - ■ ', >! ■-*■ -'- ■—-^a^J oifi* -Ct wy. ^ J "* ■• ' -.” '•\»<'rii25^'n ‘ -::n-^- .“. ' .-i :-r^r= -^j rN'/r:;::- m. i ■ ■ — * ‘ ^_ .*■;• It, I I| I PROJECT ■'••. LOCATION ♦ - • •• “'i:^') •■ ^'-' -'»"Z”» \ •-: <;- v-Jti^; ^ .-ac^. J ryr-^^'r^r^• •/V' '*••••O O 0''T *'’•Fiaure No.2 >1vv. " i II'• V / n 1' \\ \' u.3q tjQS5 85 8 ClV*J n\\^xti or uiu &. u CL S feS h2jtf iw te \ ^ \ -1 I *•*' / \\11 U'\\0 ' \=i-'; i I \ V' jnli\ i« ' 15^.1', '-, S^3^ / Vj> r‘- •■ / -«•' .•J - r''•/' - A '/ ■' '^ >5*.:• 3S| vi h'l'iii PG ) ’t^ fn i/1 y > »'i! ‘E,« \ O pul A Ik/>»- Co ' . vi X l l*<- «MUI /L l*<* «SUI ' , IvdrwW . JJ J r"^ ' '«5i t • d3T I / “I ! /'/7'J d5 .'■ ‘N' • /■ hi I 'i\\l U T‘! 'yU:n r : nt'' Ip. (-?■■•“■" III'*St lis ‘V ... l- ’ilihh LJdC >k\ ■l/'i H'l//'. 'v//47//| ;: ' > /. .',• 'X', •. //, ''. 1 ''y/y'/ •'■• />■'!.». .h > i. //•.',. •. •/•. ''Ai;,h! A '.',y •///. /y, / . . \ ■ . / f A.. 1 ! i (■.' XV " vV •-•' • -■'-----' A\w\ \ 1/ -L^ !■•“ . ' - / ' .' ) -.- - . 'f • •' :: \~ - - . - •- ' ' — I- i I - '* ..aj.ii.a \v —Uid; \ .r 11 . \ ---- h. \ • ‘•'H • I ■x. / I 1 ■ • -•>:■. tv I: A-K'' :;- - •■ v-|./' • , V 111 ••■/.' ;y ' ■' • ✓ ■' , . -V ' . X ■■- X--;i«’ "" ■. ■'—- i '- Vy,: yv--'.i V'' -V , - • lxV, 7 X .1 fif \ ( i ^^'1'I >;/./■ ■■ C\ anil! h \ ‘V \ i ; i/nC/^ ' V \ V '-'v// ' 'vV' ' ' \! 'L w I ^%\ /r.-- HTRACTO Itl.PUM ^ONCD Lvacl ' P / x" / J \ - ^ \ \ •‘'X *1V. \ \ • \ •.' 0\ ••■' '. V . •. 'v ' 's V* X, ^ s \ ^ '•. \ »\ -5S-' •*r%* AW'- • \ V• ' ‘ -V a ,• t I ‘ / / / « KFFl . I M , ----- y I |- Y _V ’• '. '4^1- ^ *♦ V .'•‘S ■'■-. c*- -rf. OB::TO- RE»ttVE-««Efl / ^ ' I \ ' il • - •■ '' '', 1 1 ' NTRACTQB LIEi PUMP RH6oNEI>-tr^tt^ iSfAdE! PUIi»^“TO PROPERTY "- 7y 965.5 X*^ - -nllL’ **... — •■vV-Ai ■"■""----------' WSlI. —:jq0—T* ^ ■• \ fV* < Al .■ 965^5^ X jH iiu ok. “”^954.5 rA $ » J / *i It j / 7 a IUa s , , aASSj/Fl I 1 . (t5'0a»TH A • I \ \ <lil T^ tr^" L. \ .* / • \ '^ ‘ \1\ J' tM ‘\ \ f A {\ J' I • ''' '' A-,.'.•.«!»■• £'• ,' I th\ v\\\\\% ;,r,'' i/,f/ / ' I !•' (it / /■. '■ <\\'^^ / / / // "l/V ■■/ < ^65,1 % \ \ r 1 r^i■* w\ 1 \t V / V _____Xiy. \ -*:s- '— I!l C I'l') I' ' ^ ' ^ /1'' 'x ! km fffl ■'' ■ ^ \ vX ■' c .• I I V ^,'V '—~~— ‘ '1 //'•/ 7 .' ____^ iV'C /.•' .!• -s ^ \ 954-5 V I •< \ CONTRAQTOr AND DISPO^ CULVER A 'X '} ^'i OASS'IFC '(tVQP>TH SEE OCTAL f / '<rx-5j:fL4 — /y y:U>.^4 OVEkFLOW^TRUCTURE '(See-sheet h) of'13-for / / 0 ).!■! f/ 'v . ' .' U .A ' V - •' V.* ^ y •• /f£30' diaiTom ARBD END SEdllOl S I , .--,’^DETAL5»- ■ "■ i )! ,‘1(10.3 r> /•/• /- j§r ^- /• i/^ \ T,’f3.6I //^;dEIiI^ated’/ x^,-.-====^/ V'v7*ETtw 7,c^^ )"r \- -^r •N % /______________________________________________________________________________— - ■/ RJSFFLb WOODS SC I ENT 1F1C X *S \ ** ; ' y '■V- 1 '' 1 \ "••• ''; lY ■ Y' X-" A1A A . \ -i ,■■.■•'— -^.i'/ '-.J \ CONTRAQlTar> AND DISPK CULVER r!,■c!' N-- f i?------ , (i j ’ NS'-1'.* I- ^ ^ k iH CUSS-'iFEl y<t5‘DEPTH SEE DETAL >1 K ■■'anj. ' If I 1 0 ■ 30' DlA.Qli END SEdriOl I > • I -.n. I ^q7tT;«^ 1 MINNtriAnMWATERSHED DISTRICT //• •S15500 Wayzala BoulevardSuite 611 Twelve Oaks Center v^-Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 *LAKE KMNNETaHKAoffice: (612) 476-7970 fw. (612) 476-7973 ,50T»mvs?board of MANAGERS; ^darksofl Undtey • Thomas « LaBounty « Madh-a S r^ame ao memorandum J^[1E[1U^ Interested Panle; RE: Mike Panzer, Wenck Associates So^tmTAsK^ment Worksheet (EAW) JUN 1'3 1995 DATE: June 12, 1995 on behatf of Oto Minnehaha Creek Watershed of the ?AW for the Long Lake Improvement Project to of the availability of the official Environmental Quality onTunVl9 1995 which begins the official 30-day °EAW will be published o.-gn pl^is. design report) are available public comment period. Supp g from the District Office by calling 476 /y/0.from me uisuicv vyk.svw „ virwn Design plans, the EAW, and the s“PP°"^"7 ‘co7tSrdocuE speciftcations. and following a publie hearing on May 25. 1995. ^ppfovals are obtained bidding documents) P'‘7g-ncies Construction of the watershed improvements ate from the apptoprtate scheduled to begin tn December of 1995.scheduica to cegm i** ----------- . wetlands and alum treatment of Long Lake.wetlands ana uium ------------- - ■ a h- ■ n A technical advisory committee fr^the cities of l^ng stages of the project, llie p,..|, urD MPCA and interested citizens. The vario.... --------------- nWSR. DNR HCD MPC ,„p„, „stages of the project .iw ^ interested ciuzei.s. Th= ™'P“*sr objectives. f4:'0U5'O4.3W'A11F<W*5-MTM DLC lj» JL<V71^Vjr JLitJU: ▼ *--i^**^ A M.EAW DISTRIBUTION LIST(6-9-95)ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY BO.VRO 0 copy) Greff DowningEnvtftHiiiieiiU] Review Frognm 300 CentemiMl OfTice Building 65S Cedar Street 1 St. Ptul,MN 55155 BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOLUCES (1 copy)Doug Utomas155 South Wtb.iha, Suite 104St. Piul, MN 55107 11 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (1 copy) Jim Alan200 Metro Square Building 121 7th Place Eait St. Paul. MN 55101 HISTORICAL SOCIETY (1 copy)Slele HiMoric PrcMrv tuon Oflice 345 Kellogg Bouievtrd West St. Peul. MN 55102DEPARTMENT OF NATLTLAL RESOURCES (3 coplei) Tom Balcom Office of Planning 500 Lafayette Road. Box 10 SuPtul. MN 55155 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY (2 copiei) Zone DeWin 645 Stele OfTice Building St. Piul, MN 55155 POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (3 copies) P.ul HoiT Enviromnentai Analysis Office 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul. MN 55155 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LIBRARY (2 copies) 300 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (3 copies) Gerald Larson Mn/DOT Environincnlal Services 34S5 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale. MN 5512S U.S. AR.Nn- CORP OF ENCINTERS (1 copy) Ben Wopat, Chief Regulatory Functions Branch Army Corps of Engineers Centre 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1 copy) Riu Mealing Dinnakcr Building P.O. Box 59040 925 Delaware Street SE Minneapolis. MN 55459-0040 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (1 copy) William D. Franz Chief of Environmental Review 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604-3590 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (1 copy) Paul Burnt 90 West Plato Boulevard St. Paul. MN 55107 U.S. FISH A.ND WILDLIFE SERVICE (1 copy) Twin Cities Field OfTice E.S. 4101 East 80lh Street Bloomington. MN 55425-1665 OmCE OF ENVIRO.NMENTAL ASSIST jVNCE (1 copy) Kevin Johnson 1350 Energy Lane St. Paul. MN 55108 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (1 copy) Lynda Voge. Referrals Meara Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul. MN 55101 HENNEPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT (1 copy) Ellen Soncs 10801 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 240 Minnetonka, N!N 55305 CITY OF ORONO (1 copy) Dorothy Hallin City Clerk P.O. Box 66 CrysulBay. MN 55323-0066 CITY OF LONG LAKE (3 copie«) Joe Lynch City Clerk P.6. Box 606 Long L»ke, MN 55356-0606 CITY OF MEDINA (3 copies) JefTKarlson City Clerk 2052 County Road 24 Hamel. MN 55340 HENNEPIN COLT^TY (I copy) Joel Settles Environmental Management Division 417 North Fifth Street Minneapolis. MN 55401-1039 MINN’EIIAIIA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (1 copy) Tom Maple. President 15500 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 611 Twelve Oaks Center Wavzaia, MN 55391 N:'0li5’O4-WDIST l^-AES Ij^ - er.vironniertal Enghetrsd^i^Wenck ~ - w PO. Bov 423 Maoie Pbin mn >5'^'^'f^]2' 47^-i::0 Fax vsi:) 479-i:-::E-rrsaii wenck.rru^\\erck.ccmJuly 5, 1995 bUL 6 1995Ms. Jeanne Mabusth and Mr. Michael Gaffron City of Orono P.6. Box 66Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066Re: Long Lake Improvement ProjectWenck File ^185-04-209 Dear Ms. Mabusth and Mr. Gaffron: ■,h week to discuss the Long Lake Improvement meeting, the major points are: ;s4”c;srs’;i-s=^ m proposed project wiU also require subsequent counc.l approval tn September 1995. M part of ^e appUeauon " Section ; 75 r„( of the DNR Protected creek running through the site, red" [rrna:.r°e of the proposed project that obtaining the requited variance should not be a problem. 3. me proposed project does not encroach or. any weUands regulated by the City of Orono. to be constructed in 1998 without requinng permit renewals. 5. The project would provide for water quality treatment of the portion of Orono that drains through the proposed project site. N:«t»rO*-aW'WOM)'UMOTO3.LTRAES.lj* J Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Mr. Michael Gaffron City of Orono July 5, 1995 Page 2 E' . 6. Potential concerns by the City of Orono include: 7. 8. # Hauling of spoils Tree removal Need for gate across the access road Demonstration that the project would be successful m removing phosphorus The City would like to have their engineering consultnnts review “ soon as possible ahead of the July ?8, 1995 deadline tor the August 21, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. The Citv of Orono considers the Cooperative Agreement proposed by the MCWD as a preliminary document. Final terms of the agreement s ou agreed to by both the City and the MCWD. I aooreciate your time and interest in the project. MCWD will submit ^ application L die earliest possible date. MCWD will also propose final terms for the Cooperative Agreement. If you havo quesuons or concerns, please call me at 479-4224 or Mike Panrer at 479- 4207. Sincerely, WENCK associates, INC. // C Andrew E. Syverson, P.E. Environmental Engineer AES/ljv cc: Louis Smith, Popham-Haik Gene Strommen, MCWT) N t5MH-3>^WORDMJ MO JOJ5 .LTR-A£S-lp» FAX TRANSMISSION 1/1 Bonestroo ^2 Rosene Anderllk& Associates Engineers L Architects St. Paul • Milwaukee 2335 West Highway 3fi St. Paul. MN 55113 612-O36-4600 rax 612-636-1311 Data: Our Re No.: /yf 1 From: fr. 1 1 , Pages To Follow. }] ! a f Original V/ii' Fellow in Ma‘i: Yes ___No To: ^Ttx(frO(\ Organizitlon: Ci Fax Numbar: "'O'S /o /•rong Subject: Remarks: Lo^I^'f PirP; g-c,-; X-E?A l^TVs ') j\/gv^c>U 'fjltiS.t v> y^por^K. Ici-k^^lLshs:---- •f) Kf A __L5—iSi#2rii£. ________5^ ihnj^.K.__tvij^ja-ciflLi. ___________------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .•«•• »■ Copy To;Signed Note To Addressee: If you did not receive all ot the paqes in good condition, please advise sender at your eariiast ccr.vcnience. Thank You. • • • For Office Use Only Fax then mall: Yes....... Nc. 'r' Call to confirm fax was received: Yes niakc copies for: File._. . Ctne'S Fax copies to (more thonone): ..... Other: ____________________________ Urgent fax Immediataly: Yes.No No Fax and return original to sender: Yes. .^^1, Hf' ■==:r: =5ST-9T-iO Memorandum To:Shawn Gustafson, City Representative if\J Bonestroo From:Ceclllo Olivier, Water Resources gLM Rosene ■ Anderilk & Re:Long Lake E.AW Review 1 Associates Inefneerj a Archittcti Date:July 5,1995 St. ^aul. M.'nn«iot« This memo contains my comments, regarding water quality and ponding issues, on the proposed Long Lake improverwnt projects. The overall approach and recommendations contained in the September 1994 Long [ Feasibility Report, prepared by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, seem weil- considered and sound. Nevcrdieiess, the foUowmg arc some concerns regarding the May 1995 Design Report for the Long Lake Improvement Project. 1. In the September 1994 repon, a 5.0-acre, 3-ceIl, wet detention pond/wctland was proposed south of C.R. 6 to reduce nuuicnis from the nonhem watershed (80% of the external phosphorus loads to Long Lake). The proposed removal efficiency of this facility was estimated to be 70%. In the May 1995 repon, this rltcmativc was replaced by a 2.5-acrc, 2- cell pond at the J22I1C location *'.*d a 6. i-acre, 2*ceU pond/wetland at Deer Hill Road in the City of Medina. Appendix D model) in the May 1995 report shows phosphorus removal efficiencies associ^ti* vi,u me C.R. 6 and Deer Hill ponds of 16% and 61%, respectively. The total combincu efficiency of both ponds is about 40% (total inflow * 4.620 Ibs/yr, net sedimentation = 1,880 Ibs/yr). Is reduemg the phosphorus removal efficiency in the watershed from 70% to 40% acceptable ? Why does the Deer Hill pond need to be 6.1-acres? What specific phosphorus removal needs to be achieved ups-earn of the C.R. 6 pond ? Can the needed additional removal be mere efScicnily and economically achieved by other means such as the use and restoration of exisung wetlands for treatment, wetland creation, channel realignment, ponding nomh of C.R. 6. implementation of BMPs and education 7 2. Table 1 in the September 1994 repon shows that 70% phosphorus removal at the C.R. 6 pond has very little im.pact on the water quality in Long Lake (Sccchi depffi increased by 4 inches). Wiuh40% phosphorus removal the impact will be even smaller. Were there any cost / benefit analyacs of the proposed ponds done as pan of the May 1995 Report 7 3. PONDNET output in Appendix D shows a total annual phosphorus removal of about 1,550 Ibs/yr at the procosed Deer Hill pond. The estimated cos; of the improvement is S L4 million. My concern is that both the total pounds of phosphorus removed and the pond ciBciency rr^ be substaniial’.y ove:c5t:nu:sd due to d-.e aasuraption (Appendix D. second pare) of an average annual phosphorus runoff concentration of 962 ppb at the Deer Hill location. My experience has been that it is ve.'v uncommon to find such high average annual concentrauons even in substanually eroded agriculrural areas. To anphasize this concern, average phosp.hcrus corxentrations at C.R. 6 (downstream of Deer Hid) are shown at a more reasonable value of 367 ppb (Appendix D. fust page). A lower phosphorus concentration at Deer Hid is supported by the October 1994 and March 1995 sampling data Usmg an urueaiisticady h:gh input ccnceniraticn overestimates total load removal and efficurncy, which may lead to the conclusion that a panicular improvement is cost-ctfccuye (say S8(X3Abs of phosphorus removed) when, compared with other aitematives, it is nOw 4 Appendix D of the Mav 1995 report also shows an onhophesphorus / total phosphorus ratio of 0.7. In other words, it is assumed that about 70% of aU the phosphorus m ux runoff is m a bio*available form. Although this number appears high, it seems to be suepened by the sampling data collected at 1994/95. My crJy comment regarding this high ratiVof bio-avadabie phosphorus m the runoff is that, m order to m,aximi» phosphorus removal cificicncv. it would make sense to encourage biological uptake (wetland creaiion/mstorauoi wetland sheet dow diversion) instead of mostly open water por.uS with just a fringe of emergent and submerged vegetation. 5.Finally, the May 1995 study (Appendix D) seems to model existing condiUons in *e watershed (a 0.24 runoff coefficient is assumed). This approach raises the quesuons . (1) How effecuve arc the proposed improvements going to be as the watershed develops? ^and (2)Was future development taken into consideration when assessing how much the a e will imorove? In my view, conclusions regarding future long-term lake water quality improvernsms derived exclusively from an cxisung conditions analysis wiU not be accurate, unless a strict no-phosphorus load increase poUcy is enforced at all new developments within the watershed. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. « ^ • •• ^ « WENCK ASSOCIATES, TSC. MEMORANDUM tw TO: FROM: R£: DATE: Board of Nftnagers, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Weock Associates. Inc. Reply to flonesffoo. Rostnc, Anderlik & Associates’ Cmique of Long Lake Improvement Project Design July 12, 1995 The District received a critique of the Long Uke Improvement Project design in the form of a memorandum titled "Long Lake EAW Review," prepared for the City of Medina by its engineer. Bonesiroo. Rosene, Anderlik (BRA), and dated July 5, 1995. Wenck answers the numbered points in the critique below. 1.BRA questions what appears to be a reduction in the overall phosphorus removal efficiency of treatment ponding on the major tributary, based on comparing the September 1994 'FeasibUity Repon" with the May 1995 "Design Report." There is in fact no reduction in efficiency; the differing efficiency estimates resulted from the use of different computer models. Based on the more conservative "Pondnet" model used in the later report, the phosphorus removals of the formerly proposed 5.0-acre pond at CR 6 and the currently designed two-pond system (2.5 acre at CR 6 plus 6.1 acres at Deer Hill Road) compare as follows: System Proposed Sepwraber 1994: 5.0- acre pond at CR 6 Designed .May 1995: 6.1- acre pond at Deer Hill Road 2.5-acre pond at CR 6 TOT.AL Phosohonis Removal (Ib/vr) 1580 1550 -1212 1880 The tributary’s pre-projee: normal phosphorus loading is 3640 Ib/yr (not 4620 Ib/yr as BRA incorrectly cites due to a double-adding of a portion of the load) so the efficiencies (per Pondnet) of the formerly proposed and currently designed systems are 43% and 52%, respectively. (The September 1994 Board of Managers, MCWD July 12, 1993 Page: 3. report used ±e "Ba'Jirjb" nodel and estiziated an efficiency of 70% for the si^ie 5.0-acre pond at CR 6 then proposed: this gave rise to the acggrent efficiency reduction.) As pan cf its first point, BRA also questions the need for a 6.1-acre pond at Deer Hill Road and asks about specific phosphorus removal requirements. The sizing of the Deer Hill Road pond is based on maximizing the usage of the site capabilities while ensuring that the designed two-pond system meets or exceeds the phosphorus removal of the fcmieriy proposed 5.0-acre pond at CR 6 (which it dees, as shown above). Finally, BRA asks \vhethcr wetland restoration, education, or other measures could achieve the needed phosphorus removal more efficiently and economically. These considerations were actually pan of the Diagnostic/Feasibility Study and have been pursued by the District in the form of a cooperative agreement with the City of Medina, where the City would take on responsibility in this area. BRA suggests that the water quality improvement in Long Lake will be too small i.Secchi depth increase implied to be less than 4 inches) to justify the stormwater treatment ponds, based on Table 1 in the September 1994 report. The second volume of the Diagnostic/Feasibility Smdy Report actually gives a basis for more accurate estimates of the projcc»,ed water quality improvements. The two mam-tributaiy ponds should cause a 0,7 foot Secchi depth increase, whereas the overall project (including in-lake treatment and upgrading of the City of Long Lake stormwater ponds) should result in a 1.6-foot Secchi depth increase. Unforronatciy, the data in Tabic 1 of the September 1994 report were taken from disparate sources not consistent with one another, BR.A. suggests that Wenck’s value for the pre-project phosphorus concentration at Deer Hill Road is unreasonably high, and that as a consequence the phcspho.ms removal of the Deer Hill Road pond may be overestimated. However, Lhe high concentration (962 ?cb) derives from the extensive monitoring program conducted throughout the ;993 runoff season by J. M. Montgomerv. al analyzed in the first volume of die Diagnosiic/Fcasibility Studv Reporx prepared by Wenck which was accepted by MPCA. On behalf of a private client, Barr Engineering performed an independent analysis of the monitoring program results and arrived at a similar (actually somewhat higher) average annual concentration for Deer Hill Road. Therefore the high Deer Hill Road phosphorus concentration is firmly established; it may reflect the Board of Managers, MCWD July 12. 1995 Page 3 substantial horse population in the tributary wa:crshcd. BRA’s citing of a much lower phosphorus concentration (367 ppb) at CR 6 is incorrect, as that concentration is largely the result of the estimated phosphorus removal by the Deer Hill Road pond. The monitoring program results acwally yielded a pre project phosphorus concentration at CR 6 of 638 ppb, again corroborated by Barr ’s independent analysis. (Although the concentration at CR 6 is about one third lower than at Deer Hill Road, the CR 6 phosphorus Igadjag is greater; loading equals the product of flow and concentration, and the flow increase from Deer Hill Road to CR 6 more tbin offsets the concennaiion decrease.) 4,BRA proposes that wetland treatment systems would perform better than ponds because of the higher proportion of orthophosphate-phosphorus (relative to total phosphorus) in the main uibuury’s flowagc. In fact, the current design includes a substantial wetland fringe (1.9 acres) at the Deer Hill Road pond, as well as additional upland wetland to be created. The County Road 6 basin also involves a mix of detention and wetland treatment. The system should (and does) include both wetland and open water. Open water is panicularly important since the monitoring program results show an onho-to-total phosphorus ratio of about 0.4 at Deer Hill Road during the peak loading time (versus 0.7 more generally). 5,bra questions whether the current design makes adequate allowance for funire development in the watershed. We believe, however, that phosphorus concentrations in runoff from the watershed will flflj increase with future deveiopment; the concentrations are already at least as high as those typical of fully urbanized areas such as Minneapolis. Moreover, the District is currently reviewing its development guidelines with the intention of instituting more stringent water quality controls. Therefore the current design should prove adequate even under future development conditions. In addition to the above, the City of Medina has commented orally that its contribution to the phosphorus loading of Long Lake ’s main inbuiary is minor, and that in particular the connibuiion of the area draining to Deer Hill Road is insignificant. However, the extensive monitoring throughout the 1993 runoff season indicated that the area draining to Deer Hill Road coninbuted approximately 40% of the flow and 60% of die phosphorus loading observed downstream at CR 6. Addiuonal stream monitoring conducted since October 1994 at Dfccr Hill Road, CR 6, and two ether locations in the main tributary system generally bears out the 1993 results: the flow at Deer Hill Road has been at least 60% of that at CR 6, and the phosphorus loadmg typically 50%. There is simply no basis for the City of Medina ’s assenions that it contributes little phosphorus loadmg to Long Lake. N 0IW04-li5'M.MCWDC7:a MCM JBBlJv r July 13, 1995 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 1550 W'ayzata Boulevard Suite 611 Twelve Oaks Center Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Attn: Mr. Michael Panzer Re: Long Lake Improvement Project Dear Mike: We received a Land Alteration Application and construction plan for the above referenced project on July 7, 1995. The application submitted is incomplete due to the fact that the portion of the project that is within the City of Medina involves the impact of a wetland. Before we can review your application you must complete one of the two attached forms. One is an exemption certification and the other is a replacement plan application. We are sending you both forms because w'e are unaware of how much fill or draining of the wetland will result in the City of Medina from this activity'. Please fill out the appropriate form and we will determine if 1) an exemption certification is appropriate (identify exemption claimed), or if 2) a replacement plan application and review process is necessary. You should clarify ho'v much wetland impact will result in the Cit\^ of Medina as we have no jurisdiction within the cities of Orono or Long Lake. Please describe the sequencing which has been used on this project, such es fir§t avoidance, then minimization and finally replacement. The sequencing issues should be addressed as the first step in the Wetland Conservation Act approval process. Please contact me or Shawn Gustafson of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc., if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. Loren Kohnen, LGU Official Enclosures (2) To: From: Re: Date: Memorandum Shawn Gusufson, City RepresenUtlve Cecilio Olivier, Water Resources Lons Lake EAW Review July 17,1995 Bonestroo Roscne Anderifk & Associates Ertgmeen t Aixhti«ti St. Paul. Mlnnetou Thu memo u in response to the Wenck Memorand-om dated July 12,1995. Without ge^nj into engineering details of how water quality ihouid or s-hould not be mooeied. there sull are e ui^rtant issues that need to be addressed from the point of view of effecuve use oi pubUc land and money for water quality purposes: 1 A design and sizing of ponds based only on "maximizing the usage of the site capabiLiics '• srem a v^cL^aeaive appmach to imptoving the water ^ ^ A better approach would be to determine, first, what arc reasonable and atiiievable go for the l^e. and, second, what is the combination of alternatives (including in-l^c practices, wetland restoration and creation, and horse tarm best management practices) tha produces the lowest cost per pound of phosphorus removed. A detailed cos ene i analysis comcanng cost with increases in Secchi depth (i.e., cost to increase Sccchi dep^ by 2 inches.' by 4 inches, etc.) would seem appropnatc. Someumes the cost o providing additional inches of transparency is very high compared with the added overall water quality benefit to the lake. . Table 3 of the second volume of the Diagnostic/Fcasibility Study Repon sull mdicaics about 4 inches of Secchi depth increase as a result of the Deer Hill Road pond. T e question remams- iTihe C.R. 6 pond. in*lake treatment, and Long Lake ponas arc already cxpccte- ,0 fflcrehse trumparency in Long Lake by 16 ,nch». u .t a coit-eifeeuve SI 4 million Oh a pond at Dee: Hill Road to add 4 inches of transparency to the lake .fa ..Lfirsn. a-TOunl of phosphoras comes from "the substanaal horse population, as staled in the Wenck memo, could an active livestock waste managemeat program .re uce phosphorus loads at a lower cost? 3 FmaUv, the Wenck m.e.mo maxes reference to a 1990 monitoring program conducted by JM Montgomery- between Marcn and Septemi^er (Figure 13 of the 1993 diagnostic study^ I do no: ^ce how an average annual phosphorus concc.nuauon o: 962 ppb is inferred from Figure 13 without csiablislung a "weighted average" including flow m.ewuremenis. 1 h^e not seen a graphic showing flow measurements for Site 1 (Deer Hill Road). . 70% of the total annual runoff typically occurs from March to June. Figure 13 shows phosphorus concentrations for those months between 200 and 400 ppb. Concentrauons may be expected.It Site 1 should have been obtadned by a weightedThe annual average conc-..trat.cn ^^aliyed to an average Minnesota year,iverage of msasuttd conesatrauons ‘nows) would help not onlyCoarly, n«s'U«d daiu on corxen^t.ons po„dNot (C=0.:d)to caMbruto imd of lo'ids the C:ty is aotuully pumng i«obut also to shew t.-sC ut> oi .Mw-...*- v* uaa . wLong Lake. W.S stated lnourp«vious phosphorus concentratton assutrxd m the model mg p,, pound of removal of the Deer ^4^*0 or.gir.il Ba.-r Engineering teport showed Phosphoms «™ved.at Site 1 Lus the 1.143 Rg/yt of phosphorus L'sSy win™.r^ie'selts about a 4f ^ference that could he tr^tslated tnto 45% less phosphorus been removed at Deer Hil o We agree with the b* «> Lake. However, ui vtcw of the ', r establish the current conditions lldroVme'“V.^^^^ to determine the most cost.ffectlve eombinetion of improvements to achieve reasonable goals at the site. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. MemorandumShawn Gustafson, City Representative John Smyth, Water Resources Long Lake EA W Review July 17,1995 Bones troo Rosene Anderflk &AssociatesEng<n*«r» * AfcMtectl St. PsuJ. Mlnrmota rceardinfl weUar.d issues, on the proposed Long Lake This memo contains my comments, reg a-d corcerrs about the wetland impacts from the DNR was completed July 6. 1993. -T-u i4m Oriftd w« d'temion oond/wetland is proposed to be construc,ed within a 1^.08 1, The Deer HiU Road wet d-ten.ion . r k pond/wcUand is proposed :icre easement on private preperry south of Hill Ro . P ^ ,0 hav. . ,urf«e «a of ^ of PUBF. (Type Tm W “'.^NR^d COE stated that the wetland has been a.niftciaUy ditched and fhe«^re""u “op^s^toicct can be considered in pan a res.oraoon project. In reciewmg the Delmeaoon Data Fonns it >PP'“» f “ most of the test plots have a low percentage ° ^ j . ^ ^995 revealed bulrushes, sedges, cartatl and a ™ ^P^^ ^ ^^d cariary grass is an "js ssstrr;:?.;: p£- —- - land by removing the hydrology in much of the wetland. The remr.ant plant cortan.ritywouW ^ with a * The°exca"vaUon of this basin as deep as proposed would S h"S "t-nd^::":: pr-oposed basm would not be considered a wetland restoration. Restormg the basin "^Tpts ^ restotd'ms o^lg L w'c'uid > more reflective of the fastor.c water regime. This wool C.T - ~ i ^ A n- «-vL ’*r'" Cws: ‘’nd would also reduce the planting cost of the wetlandtecKe can'll grals wodd fc* flooded out and Ihe axiaung seed bed w»u.dreestablish itself with t.hc restored hydrolog)'-request &om the Waiersded Dis.n,._0. ^^^^^ de-.tLune if flexible sequencing isthis point, the City would .J e “ ^ "j" [ „ „;avation within wetlands, and:2r£S “;ri« ss“™ os decision. 3. Coxetnhigl.e.niIO(CovetTypes^.b«^ 6 wet detention pond/wetlana ar.d ‘>1'^ Jeantion pond/weUand, ihere are 2.50 base a net loss in wetland acreage. Fo ■ ^ ‘ after construction, resulting acres of wetland before construction and 1.92 «te ^ 1 ^ in a net loss of 0.58 acres of f/gTacret‘i^ construction, resulting in a net lossacres of wetland before construcuon and 5.65 acres co„m^^ ^ ^ ^ of 2.02 acres of wetland. The ‘ „.jnibere are correct, there is a net loss in the after development numbers corr ^ . mitigauon increased, wetland, and either the impacts should be reduced or me nuug Please let me know if you have any quesUons or conuments. • ». •• ••• •• «» t «v • Memorandum To: Shawn Gustafson From; Stevo McComas, Water Resources Re: Long Lake EAW Review Date; July 13, 1995 Baaed on review of the Locg Lake Feasibility Report (Minneha)ia Diitrict September 199^)t the Design Report for Long Lake Improvement Projec (, ^ J f Distnet and die Qty (July 6. 1995). and review of the EAW. I have Lo„g * aVi» ii vaiid and wOrthwoUe for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. However, the watershed management plan is inappropriate for this project Ttil r.»ur«, within Ut. w.«r,h«. in »nn, of upland and wetland habitat as well u nparian and lacustrine habiuts. L^iStethat shoiSd emphasize poUution rather than treatment. I see no compelllni ^idenco to poUudoo pwentlOT approaches wUI not accomplish the »me thing, m terms of JSTns to Long Lake, that wOl be theoretically accomplished with large, man-made ponds. Presently based on cxisring Information, there is a high degree of uncertainty with ruoo . Se. ihoXrui conemoauons. and numicn: expon coefficients. Why should « exp^sive and ecologicaJly harsh treatment be installed when there arc numerous unanswered quesuens. .nci„ of Mndm. i. and ecologically harsh system. The current deiign destmys one wetland out area and tiien ^ts for spending $75,000 to revegetate the pond to ra^c what was npped out. 1 would argue that It is unnecessary. Homeowner educadon, buffer strips • cattle or horse exclusion practices, an using NURP stands for new development should address excessive watershed nutrient export problems. . ., , mnnev Rather than the Watershed District coming in to construct large treatment ponds, money would be more effectively spent to c.nhance upland, riparian, and wetl^d For in-lake orojecti, an alum applicaUon Is an appropnaie method to reduce phosphorus reteaie from Uto «.iim.n». This moull b« drmo ato proj«ts am wall Abo. becauM mare b eutlvleaf pon<!*aa<l (.Pciamoitton ertspus) m Ung Uke. a euW'" maoagamati! plan 15 neadad. If curlylaaf control i, not inabtutad. the ear y .umm« produce a phosphorus load to Long Late and negate any benefita that alum would • The Long L^ restoration objecuvei are modest; to Increase water transparency from about 1.0 meter to 1.3 meters. If waters.hed stewardship combined with m-lake management project do not accomplish lake goals, there is no indication that *«veal extra he^ In conclusion, the large ponds proposed for this rutorauon can be ddeted and re^c^ with sound watershed stewardship. A curlyleaf pandweed management plan is also needed. Together, these approaches should accomplish lake restoration goals. ,7 ^ ^ I ♦ • • • • •'V > ^ ^ *. ''%> '^'■i'*''‘r vv' • CITY of ORONO Miiokip^ OfDc« Pm Office Box 66 Cn5xal Bay, Minnesota 55313-<W>6 luly IS, 1995 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Mike Panzer, District Engineer Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 428 Maple Plain, MN 55359 . ,n,?ni ProiKt - Envitonracnul Assessment WorksheetRe: Long Lake Improvement Project Dear Mr. Panzer: , ,.nt Pmiect E-\W for which the comment period expires Regarding the Long Lake Improvement Project EA^ July 19, please note the following. 1. 4. a • The County Road 6 waterway wjthan th.e Shoreland Overlay Dtstrict: tree removal wtthin 75' of a protected waterway). downstream is a City-protected wetland. Tt. ciev Coun-ii is ' “f P"'«’ Agreement . Bas.d ontn . station that Wenck on behalf of Planning Commission at their August meetmg. Please consider the followittg comments as you proceed with the approval process; TTI VPHONT.-473-7357 • ECC-^Ta-ftflO i y MCWD July 18.1995 p. 2 iii Mitigation for Countv Road 6 tvetland alterations is proposed upstream in Medina. While the City Council generally has suggested that wetland mitigation for Orono wetlands should occur within Orono. the proposed miti'gation mav be acceptable since it wtll occur withm the same subwatershed. I noted the presence of northern pike in the creek 1^ upstream ot Coun^ Road 6 last vear. A fish barrier is proposed at the County Road 6 pond outi to prevent rough fish from using the basin for spawning. k negative impact on game fish, which wtll presumably also be barred from traveling upstream? Because the County Road 6 pond will change the character of this site fmm heavily wooded to an open water basin, perimeter reforestation should be a lugh priority. The City is concerned about transportation of dredge spoils on County Road 6 in mid-winter. The Eisinger dump site on Highway 12 receivmg location for spoils from MCWD's Gleason Lake project, and that process required constant monitoring by Orono. Safety is of great concern, not only due to truck uaffic but from the slop left on the roadway that will Ireeze and make County Road 6 even mote treacherous than it is in normal wmter conditions. It may be appropriate that a gate be installed at the entrance to the service driveway to preclude public access to the site. Andrew Syverson was advised to provide as pan of the CUP/variance application evidence that other similar ponding projects have successfully resulted in phosphorus reductions in downstream waters. Construction is proposed to commence on the Counw Road 6 basin in January 1998 Staff will recommend that the CUP/variance be granted for an extended period if possible rather than the normal one year period, to avoid the need for annual renewals in the interim. Andrew Svverson has acknowledged a number of the above concerns in his leuer of July 5. WS Additional concerns or questions may be raised by the Planning Commission and I MCWD July 18, 1995 p. 3 Council as the CUP/ variance process goes for\vard. Please feel free to contact me at 473 7357 if vou have any questions. Sincerely» Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator cc: Ceil Strauss. DNR Ron Moorse. City Administrator Glenn Cook. City Engineer Orono City Council MINUTES OF THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATION MEETING OF APRIL 18, 1995 Members present: 1. 2. MnDOT: Valerie Reinaas and Chuck Sigemid City of Long Lake: Mayor Tod Olson. Councilmembcrs Jim Hanfiel. Mike Bash and Liz Olson, and Joe Lynch City Administrator City of Orono: Mayor Ed Callahan, Councilmembers Diann G^Ktten and Gabriel Jabbour, and Ron Moorse City' Administrator Mediator: Roger Williams Approval of minutes of the .March i5ih meeting. Mayor Callahan made a correction to Ihe minutes prior to approval. He indieateJ the minutes were incorrect when they stated he agrees that Watertown Road needs to provide a route from County Road 6 on the \^est to Hishway 12 on the east. However, he is willing to move forward with consideration of the System Plan. Valene Reinaas suggested the group begin by reviewing the things that are agreed upon and identifying issues regarding the alignment segments. Mavor Callahan suegested the group should take a different approach due to the many changes that have ^en made to the alignment alternatives recently. Mayor Callahan indicated that two meetings ago the TSM plan had the support of the city council and everyone seemed to be moving in the same direction. Then a new alignment was proposed through Long Lake on the north side of the railroad tracks. Then a new' alignment was proposed along the south side of the railroad tracks. These changes happened very rapidly. Mavor Callahan suggested the group go back to what it is really trying to do. MnDOT wants to build a highway to move traffic east to west. This decision priKess is being done through an EIS process. The major alternatives in the EIS have run into a wall in Lone Lake" and Orono. I'he mediation process is being used to solve this highway building problem. Iniiially the Long Lake M.iyor felt a new highway was not needed by either Orono or Long Lake. This and other factors led to MnDOT supporting a TSM alternative which did not require a new highway. Now MnDOT can not complete the EIS because they do not have agreement on the details on the TSM by Long La e an Orono. Once the TSM alternative is agreed upon by Long Lake and Orono the EIS process can proceed. Long Lake and Orono have agreed on what is not tolerable by each city. The cities have also'aereed on several items regarding the TSM alternative. MINUTES OF THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDUTION MEETING OF APRIL 18, 1995 B An Lnterchange should be built at the intersection of Highway 12 and County Road 6. An interchange should be built at the intersection of Highway 12 and Wayzata Boulevard. MnDOT also agrees with these two items and indicates it can work out the details. There are now three options in existence regarding the TSM. A. Maintain Highway 12 on its current route. B Construct a new through route south of the railroad tracks to the Long Lake City Hall then north of the railroad tracks. C. Construct a new through route south of the railroad tracks. None of these three altematjves are currently acceptable to majorities on either council, but they are all w ithin several hundred feet of each other. This is a sufficient level of detail and acceptance regarding the TSM alternative to enable the HIS process to prtKeed. Therefore, the Mayor suggested the mediation be suspended until the EIS process is complete. He suggested the group not continue to further narrow the TSM options at this time. The Mayor indicated that when considering the corridor alternative south ot the Burlington Northern Railroad, a new Watertown Road alignment should .not be a pan ot the TSM, because the new Highway 12 would carry this traffic. .Mayor Callahan suggested that the Highway 12 and County Road 6 interchange be disconnected from the EIS prcKess to enable it to be constructed as soon as possible. The City of Orono and Hennepin County are ready to move ahead on this now. The interchange would result in immediate improvement in traftic flow and would enable a phased funding approach to the overall Highway 12 corridor project. Councilmember Jabbour indicated that the initial TSM alternative was one highway and two parkways. The current TSM alternative includes two thoroughfares (Highway 12 and County Road 6) and an additional local traffic carrier - Watenown Road. The TSM alternative south of the railroad tracks includes three major thoroughfares. Councilmember Hartfiel acreed that no current alternatives are tully acceptable and things have been moving very quickly in terms of new alternatives. He suggested the group should continue the mediation process to find a better route through Umg Lake. The best route has not yet been found, time is needed to look more closely at the various routes. -*• MINUTES OF THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATION MEETING OF APRIL 1$, 1995 Councilmcmbcr Bash indicated that Long Lake has not had time to prioritize the impacts to be avoided. Councilmember Olson indicated it was her understanding that the main element of the TSM alternative was a sharing of the traffic burden. She suggested allowing MnDOT to move ahead with the EIS process based on the existing alternatives. W Mayor Olson indicated the Long Lake Council has not found the least objectionable alternative. He indicated the long term objective is to tind a way to get from place-to-place locally without conflict with through traftic. Mayor Olson also indicated the relationship between uong Uke and Orono on this issue is much improved from what it was in the past. He suggested there is merit in suspending mediation for a period of time, perhaps 60 days, to provide time to review all the various alternatives. Councilmember Goetten indicated that even if mediation is suspended this doesn t mean that communication between Long Lake and Orono can not continue. Councilmember Jabbour indicated his vision of the mediation process was to work toward an acceptable system plan on a concepnial basis. The mediation process has been successful in fo^sing on a system plan. The cities now can benefit by MnDOT and the cities' consultants working on the details of the best solution. Councilmember Dash indicated he does not want to see a four-lane highway included in any plan. He believes a system plan can be developed that is better than any four-lane alternative. Chuck Siiierrud indicated that MnDOT knows enough now about the TSM alternatives to proceed with the CIS process. He would like MnDOT to remain involved as a resource to the cities in looking for the best alternative. He suggested that we need to ensure good communication between the cities to avoid suspicions and to preserve the positive relationship between the cities. Valerie Reinaas indicated that the EIS analysis is at a "macro" level or "corridor" level versus a detailed design level. Councilmember Bash indicated that he has not had sufficient opportunity to review the various corridors through Long l ake, and 100 feet one way or another makes a huge difference in Long Lake. Councilmember Hanfiel suggested another mediation meeting to discuss the results of Long Lake's review of the TSM alternatives. Valeric Reinaas indicated that the Highway 12 and County Road 6 interchange could be disconnected from the EIS. The environmental documentation could be separated out of MINUTES OF THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATION MEETING OF APRIL 18» 1995 the EIS. Her only concern with this is that it could give the impression that the TSM is the selected alternative before the EIS is completed. She indicated the critical mass of items required for the TSM alternative arc as follows: A. County Road 6 and 12 interchange. B. Interchange at the east end. C. D. A new connection for Watertown Road to Highway 12 A road through Long Lake that makes the downtown "user friendly ” and efficient for out state travelers. With these four items the EIS can move ahead. Roger Williams indicated that he perceives two things happening in the discussion 1. A discussion about the relationship between the EIS and mediation. 2. The decision regarding where the road should go. Chuck Sigerrud indicated that MnDOT will not select an alternative that is not politically feasible or not feasible in relation to environmental impacts or costs. Mayor Olson indicated that all routes currently proposed are flawed. We need to find a way to solve the flaws. He is not sure he sees anything that is moving us towards solving this. He perceives both councils as having internal problems regarding getting to consensus. The two cities ate the ones who will need to come up with a solution. Roger Williams indicated that the mediation process enables the cities to maintain control of their destinies versus giving the decision making to other parties. Mayor Callahan indicated he understands that all parties have agreed to move the EIS process ahead within the parameters discussed. He suggested the mediation process be suspended while the EIS process moves to completion w ithin the parameters discussed. He also suggested that the Long Lake Council needs to reach a consensus regarding a route through Long Lake before the two Councils can make further progress. After additional discussion regarding whether the mediation process should be temporarily suspended, it was determined that a mediation meeting would be scheduled for May 30th at 3:00 p.m. (Note: The May 30th mediation meeting was later cancelled.) I TIASi.:CITY OF ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING THURSDAY, JULY 13, 1995 7:15 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOTE CHANGE FROM REGULAR MEETING DATE ATTENDANCE AGENDA 1. Approval of Minutes April 4, 1995, May 1, 1995 and June 5, 1995. 2.plannin g for Award of Friends of the Park Award to Girl Scout Troops and OB A. 3. 4. Report on Starus of Old Cr> stal Bay Bike Trail (Gerhardson). Consideration of Land or Money to be Donated to Park Dedication Fund in Conncciion with the Following Subdivisions: w vt -.u a. #2031 Kelley, 2340 Fox Street - Recommend Trail Easement along the North Side of Fox Street. r c b. #2029 Smith, 2580 Fox Street - Recommend Trail on North Side of Fox Street. c. #1921 Ulrich, 1000 Loma Linda Avenue - Recommend Money. 5. 6. 7. Update on Cr>stal Bay Playground (McMillan) Update on Open Space Planning Process (Gerhardson). Review and Evaluation of Progress on 1995 Park Commission Action Plan (copy attached). 8. Other Business. ADJOURNMENT ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 5, 1995 DRAFT ATTESIDANCE The Park Commission met on the above date v\ith the following members present: Chair Richard Flint, Susan Wilson, Lili McMillan, Roben Howells, Sherokee Ilse and Jim WTiite. Public Works Director John Gerhardson represented Staff. Chair Flint called the meeting to order at 9:00 p.m. after the park tour. FRIENDS OF THE PARK AWARD Discussion centered around nominations for the 1995 Park Award. The commission’s consensus for this year’s recipient was narrowed to the Girl Scout Troops #1210/1900 for their work at French Creek Preserve and OBA for their successful completion of the Crv stal Bay ballfields. Wilson moved, Use seconded, to nominate jointly tlie Girl Scout Troops #1210/1900 and OBA as 1995 recipients of the Friends of the Park Award. Ayes 6, Nays 0. Flint noted that many in the Girl Scout Troop were high school graduates w'hich may necessitate an earlier award presentation than the usual October park commission meeting. The issue of whetlier to have a separate award ceremony for each group was discussed. It may be easier for all involved to present the award to both groups on the same night. It was agreed to finalize this issue at the July meeting and then promptly repon this to the Cit>- Council. Wilson and McMillan will work on the plaque imd presentation. Ilse will be in chcUge of relreshinents for tlie awiud reception. REPRESENTATIX'ES TO THE CITi^ COUNCIL MEETLNG The following schedule was determined: 6/12 - McMillan 6/26 - White 7/10 - Wilson 7/24 - Flint 8/14 - Use 8/28 - Howells /■*\DJOLTLNMENT Whin? moved, Howells seconded, to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. Ayes 6, Nays 0. Richard N. Flint, Chair ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 19, 1995 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the tollowing members present: Chair Stephen Peterson, Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Candace Rowlette, Charles Nolan, Jr , and Janice Berg The following represented the City StalT Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Recorder Sherry Frost. Council Member Goetten and Mayor Callahan were present Chair Peterson called the meeting to order at 7 00 p.m. SCHEDULED PL’BLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING (#1) #2025 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 WATERTOW N ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - 7:00-7:08 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Plank was represented by his surveyor, Mark Gronberg. The sketch plan was re\iewed at the last Planning Commission meeting. The applicant followed the recommendations for the preliminary subdivision. The road outlot has been platted. There is no back lot reconfiguration Lot 2 does not have to meet 150% of area and w’dth standards A width variance will be required for Lot 2 adjacent to cul-de-sac Septic testing re\ ealed adequate soils for on-site alternate site location The applicant was informed that if Lot I w as subdivided in the fiiture that the northern lot would no longer be able to access from Watertown Road. An upgraded road was asked for if the three lot subdivision were to be done. The applicant's representative inquired if the current standards at the time of future subdivision do not ask fo*^ an upgrade, if the applicant could go to what the standards say at that time. The loss of trees w ere discussed. Mabusth said this wou'd be looked at w hen Lot 1 w as further subdivided Smith asked what the future desire fc. tiie property is according to the applicant His representative said Plank would like to subdivide the remaining property into two lots at some future date Plank was reported to say he has no objection to the requirements but wants it open to what the standards are at that time. During public comments, Mark Jones, a Realtor with Burnet Realty, said the 6 acres with the house has been sold contingent upon approval of the subdivision. 1:1- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNLNG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 1 . p*2T^ - Ccrtirued) Commissioners agreed that changes to the plans were made as asked. Mabusth noted a newly defined designated wetland on the propert>‘. Mabusth commented that a vacation of the utility and drainage easement on the old shared lot line would be asked for when further division occurs. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2025 with the Stall recommendations 1-4. and with the understandinu that if Lot 1 is subdivided it will be subject to the standards and ordinances at that time Ayes 6, Nays 0 (#2) #2029 WILLIAM F. SMITH, 2580 FOX STRi-ET - PRELLMLNARY SUBDIVISION - 7:50-8:30 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and AlTidavit of Publication were noted Mr. Smith was present At the last meeting of the commission. Smith was asked to gain access to the newly created lot from Fox Run Four property owners have sent letters voicing their opposition to the use of this access The applicant's subdivision proposal requests the use of the existing easement drivewav to serve all three lots. It was noted that there is 2+ acres of drv contiguous land to the west of the driveway. Mabusth said another alternative suggested at the sketch clan review would be to allow a second curb cut to serve the nvw lot, but that would conflict with the City's comprehensive management plan ‘or rural areas. An earlier subdivision stipulated a disclaimer that if an additional lot was created, a private road would be needed to serve 3 lots To satistV the current code, a 24 ’ wide paved road would be needed with a cul-de-sac within the only area available, a designated wetland. Mabusth said if division w as considered a back lotyfront lot configuration, an outlot at 30' width could be installed along the east lot line Lot 2 would have to continue using the existing drive. There w ould be minimal encroachment of the designated wetland. The applicant would like the Commission to recommend using the existing driveway for the lot Smith has added 4" of new tu-avel. which has already conformed to the ruts. The applicant will bring in a blade to cut the drive to make it uniform and then crown it for proper drainage. Smith said this would be done to all of the drivewav and the turnaround areas. Mabusth noted that the on-site septic tests confirm suitable area for septic treatment on Lot 2 There would be contiguous 2-acre of dry land to west of easement drive that intersects Lot 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON RJNE 19, 1995 (#2 - #2029 William Smith - Continued) I was informed that Lot 1 cannot be further subdivided due to the wetlands. Lindquist said this would mean that there would be a maximum of three lots serv ed by the driveway if approved. The Applicant asked the Commission to consider the similarities with the Stronghold subdivision, where a 30' outlot roadwav was aooroved. which abuts the McNhilan property. This roadway would also exteiKi no further The majority of the driveway serves two existing residences; the new drive would turn off immediately Mabusth said this is a narrow grav'd easement drive. The Stronghold property is served by a pav^ platted outlot. There is a 14’ desiunated easement; but the actual driveway is 10’ in its present state. Mabusth said there is a need to retain the 26' setback from the wetlands It was noted that there is a loop or turnaround adjacent to the heme that could meet the needs of the fire department if necessary Smith said if the application is approv ed, the bam will be relocated. A larcer turnaround could be created where a larue vehicle could drive in. back up and drive out. Smith plans on creating additional parking for the approach to the house. Peterson said the City is looking at the driveway issue in general The fire and police departments would like larger turnarounds. No changes have been made to the ordinance as yet Peterson recommended maintaining the drive without paving. Smith said if an immediate cut were made, it would affect large trees and Is also where the septic enters the property So as to not disturb the topography of the site. Smith asked for a cut from the driveway further to the north Lindquist would like to see the driveway easement be wider than 14’. Mabusth said this mav create a problem in uettinu 2 acres drv conticuous. Smith said the original cut was 14’ and vegetation has encroached into the 14'. Mabusth asked Lindquist if he felt the outlot or eWment should extend all the way to Lot 3 It was noted that the middle lot is owned by another person, and the City has no authority to include advising this property as to the need to now create a driveway outlot Smith asked that the first portion, 50'- 75',of the drive extending to the first turn otf be wider and base the width on the space available rather than the 15’ outlot It was noted that changes to the middle lot could tngger pulling the scenario all together This lot IS not larue enouuh for subdivision. Mabusth Questioned whv the apolicant would join in the subdivision ’ Smith said the owner of the lots informed him the turnaround was available for emergency vehicles. Smith '.aid he is willing to do what is necessary to allow rigs to enter the upper lot. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNTE 19. 1995 (#2 - #2029 William Smith - Continued) Beth Casody, owner of Lot 2, said expanding the width of the drive defeats the purpose of maintaining the aesthetics of the area An expansion would encroach on the trees The area is well populated by wildlife Casody said she would be happy to maintain the circle for emeruency vehicles. LindQuist said the initial wider road up to the first drivewav would be preferred for safety reasons. Gordon Buhrer, owmer of propeny to the west, said he appreciates the nairowmcss of the existing road. If the road had to be widened, Buhrer telt it would encourage more traffic, and did not sec any reason to widen it if the neighbors each preferred to keep it narrow. Contmission members did not believe the the amount of upgrade being discussed would affect either the privacy or the aesthetics Maintenance would be required, howev er In discussing how wide the driveway should be, Mabusth noted there are no standards in the code for driveways. Schroeder commented, if we now w ere to have three homes on the driveway, it would technically be a road, so the Commission is able to discuss the width Rowlette commented on the inability to pass on the road Nolan said the 4 ot gravel for the driveway is insufficient Smith said there was also a 6" underlavment. C’sodv reported on a moving van's ability to manuever and make a complete ciiclc • ’he tu iiaround in Lot 2. Casody also noted that meeting another car on the drive .miy ‘ ared a 15' backing up movement of a vehicle. ^ 'b cautioned about setting a precedent, citing the Stronghold property being paved ft cul-de-sac. Mabusth said the paving was completed after the fact and nOiC.. he ncil had dealt with the same issues on the Melamed subdivision.\ 1^ Rowlette moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2029 for variances to the subdivision regulations with the stipulation that additional nropeny be available on the first lot to remain at 2 acres to allow widening and upgrading of the driveway to the location ol the new curb cut off the driveway The 10’ existing drive’vay will be widened to at least 18' with grav el. The remainder of the driveway acccessing the other two lots will be widened to a 12' width An outlot will be designated through Lot 2 The applicant asked what would happen if the w etland rules were relaxed in the future Mabusth said the proposals all would be subject to current code Aves 7. Navs 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19. 1995 (#3) #34)31 BRUCE R. KELLY AND IRMA J. KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - S:30-S:45 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr. & Mrs. Kelly were present. The property in question is located at the intersection of Fox Street and Willow Dnve in a RRIB zone requiring 2 acre minimum lot size and 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land. The applicant s'propose a shared access at the existing curb cut, which has been approved by the Engineer Mabusth cautioned the owner that the driveway easement would have an impact on division of Lot 1 in the future The area of the vehicular easement must be excluded from dry land area. It was noted that the top ot the hill at the east side of the new lot was an acceptable location Mabusth said there was a problem with the septic testing. The existing septic system serving residence is located on Lot 2 and would not meet current septic standards Mabusth noted there appears to be no problem with the septic sites on the new lot, but Staff is unable to locate the sites because the septic diagrams are not to scale They need to be redrawn to scale Mabusth said new septic testing needs to be completed for developed lot and a preliminary surv ey An additional 5' is needed to have 200’ of lot width to the rear of the 50' street setback. The Applicant said both lots were over 200' wide Kelly did not understand that the easement area is deducted from the dry buildable. The reason for the subdivision is to build a retirement*type home on the other lot. Kelly said the lot line was not necessarily fixed, but he only wanted to make it easy and simple Kelly understands that two new septics are needed and cited a report saying there is adequate space on both lots for mound systems 1 le does not understand the need for tabling the application Rowlette commented that the survey identifies the property Kelly had thought the survey was certified Rowlette said she could not approve the application without 200' on Fox Street for the new lot Mabusth said structures need to be located in the field and setbacks confirmed from a fixed lot line, and the locating of structures through topograpical mapping does not satisfy' requirements ot a preliminary plat. Schroeder said, although the Commission can not act on the application, direction can be given Schroder noted that the septic seems to meet the requirements Rowlette said caution was needed so as not to destroy a future subdivision. Peterson moved, Nolan seconded, to table Application #2031 for City review of the septic sites and for a survey pinpointing structures and wells Ayes 7. Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JLINT 19, 1995 ACTION ITEMS (#4) #2005 SAILORS WORLD MARINA & BOAT CLITB, 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 8:45-9:25 P.M. Mr. DeSantis was present. Mabusth noted that this application involves the first marina to apply for a condinonal use pennit for boat club use. Two requirements of the code are confirmation of an approved lanscaping plan and adequate parking. The marina has an approved landscape plan, and the City holds a De\'clopcr's Agreement and letter of credit to ensure completion Mabusth noted a recent variance application tor marina approval was conditioned on additional otf-site parking. 46 stalls are required a*'d 41 are available. There are 66 rent^ slips available. Desantis said 4 stalls are not usable and 9 are maintained tor the boat club. There is an accessory structure located in one stall The Applicant provided an in-depth memo on the impact and comparison of parking needs for boat club use and slip rentals Examples were given for the differem scenarios of 60, 80, and 100 boat club members It was further broken down into pre, peak, and late season levels. DeSantis voiced his frustration with the process It is his opinion that he is getting approval fci a business he has already been doing for three \ears The club members numbered 24 in the first year and 50 members the last two years. DeSantis uses the current formula of 7 people per I stall for rental use for boat club members at 60 user level The Applicant maximizes his business via the boat club use He looks at the lev’els of usage to pinpoint his growrth. When the boat club is using more parking space than is available, DeSantis will leave a slip open to compensate His maximum use is projected at 46 stalls on the July 4th weekend DeSantis emphasized his ability to control the parking by adjusting from club and rental uses DeSantis uses several methods to limit the parking. He asks people to drive together to control the over use of the parking stalls Parking passes are placed on the vehicles to reuulate the parking Towing can be done for violators 12 stalls may be used at the Art Center for overflow if needed Peterson recommended this relationship be maintained for future overflow parking use DeSantis noted the difficulty in working with the MPCA over the soil contaminations. A probe is being done to see where the contamination conres from The landscaping plan needs to be worked around this pollution problem. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANTSITNG CONLMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#4 - #2005 Sailors World - Continued) The retail operation was questioned. 8 stalls are reserved lor this operation. DeSantis said he no longer sells or wholesales boats. The general public does frequent the retail operation part of the year Rowlette noted that 2 stalls w'ere probably sufficient for this use. There were no public comments. Lindquist asked about the request for 60 memberships and the growth potential. Peterson was concerned with overgrowth, noting the parking spaces at the Art Center. DeSantis ^iH his operation would be ma.ximized at 100 club members. Peterson asked how the Art Center parking was handled DeSantis said the patrons are followed there The membw is responsible for his party and allows only 1 car per party This is monitored DeSantis said his facts were compiled from his records. Peterson asked how mnay members DeSantis was asking approval for DeSantis would like a ceiling of 100. Schroeder asked how ofren the Art Center is being used. DeSantis said his need is during prime season only, 6/15-8/15, with 10-12 stalls At this time, he has been able to park 10- 12 at the nearby gas station Mabusth said if a number of memberships were approved and the number was to change, DeSantis would have to reapply for the CUP. Mayor Callahan commented that if the concern was over parking, the approval could be conditional on the number of stalls. Callahan noted that once the CUP is completed, it is diflBcult to measure the membership. Schroeder said this would be incumbent on the good relationship with the Art Center, and the number of off-site spaces allow ed would become the issue Lindquist recommended approval be based on a maximum on the number of off-site parking stalls provided. Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2005 for a conditional use permit to provide 25 off-site parking stalls for a ma.ximum of 100 boat club members. The final installation of the landscaping plan cannot be completed until the EP A issue has been settled. Once this is resolved, the Applicant has 60 days in which to fulfill the landscaping plan, or by 6/15/96 if resolution occurs during the winter months. Yearly certifica*ion of the parking arrangement for the 25 off-site stalls shall be submitted w ith the annual commercial marina license application. Ayes 7, Nays 0. = ■MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#5) #2020 JAMES BRUCE, 565 LEAF STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION . CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7;0»*7:49 P.M. Mr. Bruce was present. The application was tabled at the last Planning Commission meeting subject to applicant submitting an amendment of the cov enants ot the Stielow Addition The application is for a three-lot subdivision with a lot line rearrangement. The lot line rearrangement will provide the additional area needed to lultill area requirements for 3 lot division. Lots 1 and 2 will be accessed from Oxford Road, which is a private road, with Lot 3 served by public road. The accessoiy structure on Lot j will be removed prior to final plat application. The Engineer has asked for a 15’ sewer utility easement along north lot line ot Lot 1 to ser%e the church property to the east There had been public concern o\ er tree removal with the house pad location on Lot 1 Bnttc said he has not changed the propert>’s house pod location Bruce did meet with the neighbors to the north, who have a swimming pool located 50-60* from the property line Bruce said the neighbor was concerned over impact on the users of the swimming pool. A neighborhood meeting was held regarding the covenant bylaws It was found that the property owner to the north ’s only desire was not to be able to see a house from their property, but gained no support from others, as they felt this was unreasonable. As far as the tree removal issue is concerned, Bruce said he would agree to plant pine trees. The Nelson ’s, the neighbors to the nonh, were not convinced that this solved the issue, but did agree, according to Bruce, that the building pad fits into the normal setback Peterson clarified with Mabusth that the covenant amendment was signed and meets the required issues for this property ’s subdiv ision Bruce said the covenant was established in 1978. and this would be the third time the covenant has been amended. Mabusth said a width variance is required for Lot 3 due to narrowness of land at 199 98 feet rather than the 200 feet required The applicant is asking for a vacation of the existing easement over the drainageway in Lot 1 . The Engineer has reviewed this request and noted it can be redesignated to 20', where 40’ had been dedicated in the original plat. Mabusth sa»d this was an ambitious designation and is not needed Mabusth advised that applicant proposes no change in drainageway. WIKIITFS OF THE ORONO PL.VW1NG COMMISSION ^®^VttETOGHELDONnJNE 19, 1995 (#5. *2020 Junes Bruce - Commued) tad «con»«nded the IS ,ta, this tvould be the tee to ge.n the with this, except for the issue ot .te j ^le impact on tree removal easement but had reservations as to the location ano Smith asked what the wo^ase “teorwouX"L^.Sng for line Min The Planning Commission propeny line to nmed that » easement though, the easement could be in eliminate interference with building pa . construction can occur at this the middle where the drainage 'VE^neer review and determine the location lor UKstion Undguist by the sz“.r sE Ro«Cu, w«,V like .0 tv '^.^'‘IjJi^Ehe'l'E'lEee. The CilMiV! pU Mabusth said the City lacks the CO t evf the aesthetics Bruce tell the customer was determined by Bmce^; S--' the value of the lot would would choose this particulate site ^ reiterated that he is be restneted if he could not build on 50ot the sensitic e to the trees on the lot the north and trees west of the proposed house. ^ Rowlette asked why Bruce wantedifrdriveway ,he driveway to the north " on the property Bruce would ike tSlLierwor "u^nt r« V .30;^ commissioners had no problem t .. this usage. . ^ be addressed at that time. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#5 - #2020 J4Ui» Brace • Continued) Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2020 for a preliminary subdivision. The City Engineer would determine, thru a meeting with Bruce, the location of the easement, whether along the northern 15* of the lot or along the drainageway. A lot width variance is recommended for approval as well as the access layout for Lots 1 and 2 served by Oxford Road and Lot 3 from Leaf Street. The guest house on Lot 2 cannot fimrtiftn as an independent residential unit, only as a part of a residence. An additional 5 b required along with the 10* dedication of the utility/sewer easement. The driveway to serve the house on Lot 2 is allowed temporary use while the residence is in use or until developed. This would be removed prior to final inspection of home Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#6) #2021 JAMES HALE/JAMES BRUCE, 575 OXFORD ROAD AND 565 LEAF STREET - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGE.MENT - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:49-7:50 P.M. Mr. .Bruce was present. Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve AppUcation #2021 for a lot line rearrangement as presented with StafiT recommendations. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#7) #2023 BETTY SUMNER, 3131 CASCO ORCLE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARLNG 9:25-9:32 P.M, The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mrs. Sumner was present. Mabusth reported that the application is for paving improvements within the lakeshore yard Underlaying plastic is being removed and replaced with concrete pavement under a second story deck as well as concrete pavement by the garage door Hardcover exists at 42.9%, and there are no changes to this figure. 750 s f, or 4.2%, of permanent, non- structural hardcover is being added The pavement would not extend beyond the deck. Thvie is crushed rock on the shoreline where exposed earth is located on a slope. There is no underliner but bits and pieces of old plastic only. This is not rip-rap Mabusth noted that she did not think this would solve the erosion problem .Mabusth asked the Commissioners if this application should have been required to come before the Commission for approval Rowlette said yes, noting that in some applications reductions in hardcover could be made. There are none for this application. Hardcover improvements were reviewed. There is a drive, house with deck and limited walk providing access to residence. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#7 - #2023 Betty Sumner - Continued) NoUn mov«l, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2023 for hardcover v’ariance to install permanent, concrete pavement. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#S>#2024 JAMES WILSON, 2565 LYDIARD AVENUE - CONDITIONAL LSE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 9:36-9:53 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Alfidavit of Publication were noted Mr. Wilson was present. The Application if for a conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property as a non-conforming use in B-4 zoning This use has existed since 1959. A fabric shop was located in the residence structure up to the mid 1980 s. The B-4 office professional use would allow the applicant to operate a CPA business with 2 full and 1 part-time employees four months out of the year A second office is being proposed There is no expansion. The property is within 1000 of the lake. The majority of the paving improvements and structure are outside of this area. No hardcov'er variance is being ask^ for or required. The Engineer has reviewed the site plan improvement for the property There will be 3 QjT'Street parking stalls on the south side of the existing drive. It was desired to close oft access to the north, but it would not be safe to do so. The bushes are in need of trimming at north curb cut. Applicant must contact County to work within right of way Wilson should also contact Clair Rood for permission to cut trees if necessary. Lindquist asked where patrons of the accounting firm would park during tax season. The applicant said only one client would be there at one time. Schroder believed this to be a good use of the property and inquired about a sign. Wilson said he would be using a 4'x8’ sheeted plywood sign. There was found to be no problem with this sign. Nolan asked if the use was grandfathered in. Mabusth said the code would allow the continued non-conforming use as the resident use exists to current time. Nolan also asked if this was two primary uses on the same site, and if this is a problem. Mabusth said there was nothing in the code to address the mixed use Planning Commission noted the commercial part of the property faces Shadyw'ood Road and the residential faces Lydiard. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#8 - 2024 James Wilson - Continued) There were no public comments Mabusth said neighbors called in support of this application. Berg moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #2024 for a conditional use permit with conditions 1 and 2 as noted The number of employees is limited to 4 Any further expansions would need to be review ed Ayes 7. Nays 0. (#9) #2026 NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE, *75 WAYZATA BLVD. - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:53-10:10 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. New Horizon was represented by Sharon Bergen. The Application is for a height and signage area variance The child care facility is in a residential zone but use permitted through a conditional use permit. Surrounding uses of property were reviewed The signage is limited to 12 s.f and would not be easily seen. New Horizon is asking for additional signage. The topographical conditions require that travelers be alerted to the child care center’s location The entrance is to the east and the facility is to the west. There is a drop in elevation adjacent to read. The nearest residence is 400*+ away The property is adjacent to the Luce Line. The Applicant is asking for a illuminated 6x6’ New Horizon sign located near the facility. An entrance pylon would not be lit but would be 4x4' in size and 1 7.8' high. These signs are both two-sided. Mabusth said she was not aware that the signage was two-sided. The Applicant said this could be changed if needed. Nolan commented that the height of the signs was an issue. The need to know who is there and how to get there is needed but these dimensions seemed too high The Applicant said the grade of the area required the height variance. At present, parents of the children are finding it difficult to see the entrance. Commissioners discussed the height and from where the grade level needs to be established Schroeder was concerned over the need for a sign for safety reasons and then the reason of advertising only. He suggested the Applicant speak with the highway department about a "blind spot" or "watch for children" sign if they w ere concerned with safety. Peterson said his children had gone to this center It was his opinion that the sign and driveway were terrible Peterson w as not in favor of a big commercial lit sign next to the natural Luce Line trail. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNTE 19, 1995 (#9 - #2026 New Horizon Child Care - Continued) I was concerned with granting a variance for a sign without first addres» ng the safety of the entrance. A sign would not solve the safety issue. Schroeder questioned whether a lit agn would accomplish a sale entry. Nolan noted the lighting intensity would also be a factor in consideri.ig safety. The Applicant said the entrance sign would not be lit in order to be sensitive to the natural area. The other lights are on timers and would be lit only during the daytime hours or when the center is being used Mabusth said this is a residential area, and lighting of signage was not necessary when facility is closed. Peterson said the regulations should be adher^ to in this case. Nolan did not necessarily agree He commented that the 12 s.f sign allowance would probably not be adequate. The canopy over the doorway was said by the Applicant to provide shelter for the parents and for security. It would be lit w hen children are coming and going. The issue of how this was lit was discussed. Peterson asked for electrical detailing on the canopy. Nolan was concerned that this again was an advertising sign. Schroeder asked the Applicant to speak w ith the Dept of Transportation for assistance in making the entry safer. Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to table Application #2026 to gain further feedback. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#10) #2027 RICHARD LEE KAIL, 3753 CASCO AV ENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 10:10-10:15 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr Kail was present. Kail lives in the residence on the property. The Applicant is asking tor an area variance for a new residence which will meet the setbacks There is a designated wetland in the comer of the property. As the property is sewered, the Applicant will receive credit for this wetland. There aic City owned parcels located to the south which functions as a retention area. There would be no impact on any other property from drainage from the new construction. The alley is platted but serves no purpose. A suggestion was made as to the vacation of this alley. Smith commented that this would be the time to clean up the propeny. There were no public comments ’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 (#10 - #2027 Richifd KaU - Continued) Rowlette moved, Berg seconded, to ^prove Application #2027 for a lot area variance with conditions 1-4 as listed. The Applicant w<^d have 30 days after receiving the occupancy permit to comply with condition #4. The property is also to be cleared of outside debris and cleaned up. Ayes 7, Nays 0 Kail inquired about the vacation of the alley. Kail was informed this would be a separate process and would require a public hearing. He was further inftymed to contact John Oerhardson. (#11) #2030 RICHARD LAVERE. 995 WILDHLRST TRAIL - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 10:15-10:30 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr. LaVcre was present. TTw Application is for an average lakeshore setback variance and hardcover variance for an upper level deck at the lakeside of the residence. A 1992 variance for a 20'x31' garage <t^ll addition made by a past owner required removal of 210' of landscape plastic and removal of a garage. This has been complied with. Hardcover is now at 4900 s.f or 35.41%. The deck would be 8' wide and expand to 14' maximum depth for 10' length. A small concrete patio exists beneath proposed deck. There is also a sidewalk beneath the deck offsetting an additional 90 s f The drawing is not to scale and shows 5082 s.f of hardcover, wherein the survey shows 4991 s f The plans provide no detail on area under the deck. The Planning Commissioners said they had no problem with the average lakeshore setback variance. Lindquist was concerned with the driveway and requested hardcover numbers be verified. Rowlette asked that no application be reviewed in the future without forms being completely filled out. She also asked that the hardcover stay at the amount it presently is or be reduced. Rowlette noted in speaking with the owner at the property, a canopy would be removed and recommended to them that the deck did not extend beyond the windows. It was also recommended that the patio underneath the deck be removed. The present deck is planned to extend the whole length of the house. Commission asked that the worksheet be completed prior to this application going before the Council and hardcover be no more than 35.41%. Schroeder moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #2030 subject to hardcover supported by worksheet at 4900 s.f or 35.41%. Ayes 7, Nays 0. 1 MINX’TES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19. 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#12) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTaT!\ E ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12,1995 - STEVF. PETERSON Peterson informed the members of the results of the Council meeimg of J .me 12, 1995 Discussion of these results followed. (#IJ) OTHER is:, c ES FOR DISCUSSION No additional issues were discussed (#14) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE N.AY 15. 1995 MEETING Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve the Minutes ot the Planning Commission Meeting of May 15, 1995. Ayes 7, Nays 0 (#15) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIV E TO ATTEND THE JULY 10,1995 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Sandra Smitfe will attend the July 10 meeting of the Council. ADJOURNMENT Rowlette moved. Berg seconded, to adjourn at 10:35 p.m. Ayes 7, Nays 0. Stephen Peterson, Chair Person cm OF ORONO notice of counxil work session NOTICE, is hereby given that the Orono City Council will meet in a work session on Wednesday, July 26, 1995, at 8:00 a.m., in the CouncU Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway. Orono, Min*.“siMa. The purpose of this meeting is to review with staff the proposed 1996 budget. This meeting is open to the public. /s/ Dorothy M. Ilallin City Clerk Posted at; Citv Hall Navarre Post Office Long Lake Post Office Crystal Bay Post Office ISSlED/fEES COLLHCTEDREPORT HBR. BPRMTISS-1 )ATB OP RUd 07/13/95'ERMIT TYPEbuilding ■-GL FAMILY-NEW ;P-A£tt)/REMODEL ;P-ACC STRUCTURE JBMO/PRINCIPAL )BMO-ACCESSORY \CC/GARAGES :ub-total Mechanical JEATING SYSTEMS MR CONDITIONING VOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE ;AS LINE INSPECT JUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total i^lumbing •’IXTURES VATBR METER Sub-total Sewer fc Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION lEW SEPTIC SYSTE IRNFLD fc/OR TANK SAC ONLY Sub-total Fire FIREWORKS Sub-total User Defined t,AND ALTERATION LAWN SPRINKLER fSub-total Grand-total QTY3 2(i 6 1 2 3 41* JUNE 1995PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORCWO REQUESTER:PAGBi•• CURRENT RANGE - 0€/01/9S - OC/30/95 -- PREVICXJS RANGE - 0«/01/94 - 06/30/94BASE FEB 11,688.00 1,098.50 50.00 60.00 574.25 19,057.50* VALUATION885,000.00 1,511,843.00 69.000. 00 0.00 0.00 37.000. 00 2.b02,843.00* PLAN REVIEW3,631 6,671 714 0 0 373 38 27 02 00 00 27 11,309.94* QTY4 25 4 1 1 3 38* BASE FEE5, 517 2,364 215 80 30 243 00 50 00 00 00 00 8,449.50* VALUATION1,253.600.00 200.213.00 14.700.00 0.00 0.00 39.840.00 1.508,353.00* PLAN REVIEW 3,586.06 917.48 83.20 0.00 0.00 292.50 4,879.24* 4 4 0 7 1 3 2 21* 503 07 220.00 0.00 288.75 35.00 105.00 70.00 1,221.82* 40,245.00 14,000.00 0.00 16.324.0C 400.00 2.335.00 2.250.00 75,554.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 3 0 1 2 1 0 3 10* 210.61 0.00 81.25 70.00 35.00 0.00 105.00 501.86* 16,850.00 0.00 6.500.00 3.200.00 1.700.00 0.00 1.450.00 29,700.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 11 0 11* 877.38 0.00 877.38* 55,226.79 0.00 55.226.79* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 9 4 13* 798.75 500.00 1,370.75* 59,500.00 0.00 59,500.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 10 1 0 11* 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 50.00 0.00 1,050.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 8 5 5 2 5 25* 200.00 175.00 500.00 150.00 4,000.00 5,105.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 2* 100.00 100.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0 0* 0.00 0.00* 0.00o.oc*0.00 0.00* 5 3 8* 250.00 105.00 355.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 4 5* 50.00 140.00 190.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 94**22,661.70**2,633,623.79**11,389.94**91**15,625.11**1.597,553.00**4,879.24** f ' PBiltITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED %JIHE 1995EPOn NBR. BFEERPTl-1ATE OP RUM 07/13/95 ASE FEE LMI RBVIEtf URCHARGE IC GBAncn FEB AC tJVESTIGATlON EPOSIT AIL IN KRMIT total BUILDING 19,057.50 11,399.94 1,253.10 0.00 0.00 549.25 0.00 32,249.79 EPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 •ATE OF RUN 07/13/95 REPORT TOTAL lASE FEB 22,661.70 LAN REVIEW 11,3B9.94 •URCHARGE 1,327.99 ,IC. SEARCH FEE 0.00 !AC 0.00 INVESTIGATION 649.25 )EPOSIT 0.00 tAIL IN 26.90 ’ERMIT TOTAL 36,055.78 mechanical 1,221.02 0.00 30.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.90 1,275.51 iiif*PERMIT FEE REPORT •••••CITY OF ORONOFROM06/01/95 TO 06/30/95PLUMBINGSEWER fc MATER 077.31 0.00 29.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.50 916.90 1,050.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 1,155.50 t * « ••PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 06/01/95 TO 06/30/95 USER 355.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 358.00 vjPAGE IREQUESTERJSIGN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PiRB IQQ.QO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 PAGBt REQUESTER) . r s? sMU, JUL 13/x!>J5, 4:19 pm'•RMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 1995•iRMIT WORK AODR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY PAJB 1OWNER LAST NM VALUATION01 2655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W01 2820 DEER RUN TR 01 1870 6TH AVE N 02 3133 CASCO CIR 02 2920 FOX ST 02 855 PARTENWCX7D LA 02 975 TONKAWA RD 02 30 LUCE LINE RIDGE 02 1645 BOHNS PT RD 04 2420 WATERTOWN RP 04 3195 WATERTOWN RD 04 2240 BAYVIEW PL 04 538 RUSSELL AVE 05 2440 WATERTOWN RD 06 3680 TOGO RD 06 3340 WATERTOWN RD 06 3231 CASCO CIR 06 1310 REST PT IJV 06 1305 NORTH ARM DR 09 345 SPRING HILL RD 09 735 DICKEY LAKE DR 09 090 FOREST ARMS LA 09 2990 SOMERSET LA 10 3615 LYRIC AVE 10 1995 WEST FARM RD 11 880 PARTENWOOD RD 11 2606 WEST LAFAYETTE F 11 3750 CASCO AVE 11 2440 WATERTOWN RD 16 4099 HIGHWOOD RD 17 2475 DUNWOODY AVE 17 530 RUSSELL AVE 18 4465 BAYSIDE RD SUSSEX RD 95/06/30 OR- 95/06/05 OR- 95/06/19 OR- 95/06/02 OR- 95/06/02 OR- 95/06/16 OR- 95/06/15 OR- 95/06/19 OR- 95/06/29 OR- 95/06/09 OR- 95/06/21 OR- 95/06/30 OR- 95/06/26 OR- 95/06/07 OR 95/06/13 OR- 95/06/07 OR- 95/06/00 OR- 95/06/09 OR- 95/06/14 OR- 95/06/08 OR- 95/06/13 OR- 95/06/13 CR- 95/06/28 OR- 95/06/21 OR- 95/06/22 OR- 95/06/05 OR- 95/06/21 OR- 95/06/22 OR- 95/06/29 OR- 95/06/26 OR 95/06/00 OR OR 006960007022007065 007014 007021 007059 007061 007066 007108 007044 007047 007048 007092 007027 007028 007031 007037 007042 007055 •007036 •007051 -007053 -007105 -007007 -007094 -007026 -007080 -007093 -007101 -007100 -007038 95/06/26 OR-007098 95/06/22 OR-007090 95/06/26 OR 007099 29 3131 CASCO CIR 95/06/01 OR-007017 29 450 WOODHILL RD 95/06/00 OR-007025 29 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 95/06/09 OR-007029 29 2800 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 95/06/07 OR-007033 29 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING 95/06/16 OR-007045 29 315 SILVER MEADOW DR 95/06/19 OR-007058 MC 33 41C 855 PARTENWOOD LA 95/06/00 OR-007020 •I 01 1305 SHORELINE DR 95/06/22 OR-007089 »C 19 2C 200 WAYZATA DLVD 95/06/09 OR-007043 • • m 01 4680 DAYSIDE RD 95/06/29 OR-007016 01 1006 WILDHURST TR 95/06/05 OR-007023 01 4620 TONKAVIEW LA 95/06/06 OR-007030 01 2735 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 95/06/02 OR-007032 01 3780 DAYSIDE RD 95/06/07 OR-007035 01 2900 DEER RUN TR 95/06/19 OR-007000 01 2905 DEER RUN TR 95/06/19 OR-007002 155902511934046113237466 1471D532 00000000 12312231 14490866 15360277 19430037 00000000 14742130 0000000j 00000000 19726025 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 15600103 00000000 00000000 1476115:> 14717200 17297002 17227129 14724110 13237400 19726025 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 19275298 00000000 19299646 17867711 15590251 15448761 15300479 19342000 OOOOCOOO 00000000 34556323 36332561 34205071 00000000 35595900 35421166 39414211 EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC PETER ANDREA CO KESLER CONST i. DRY WALL DANBERRY COMPANY GLACIAL RIDGES JUDD INTERIORS LEINTZ JOB R JOHN KRAEMER 6 SONS INC ARTISAN CONST k DESIGN MARK WACHOLZ CONSTRUCTION ATLANTIS POOLS, INC. POOL CONCEPTS WINDOWS MIRRORS k MORE WESTWAY COMPANY GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. PTL CONTRACTING MARK WACHOLZ CONSTRUCTION BLESSING k ASSOC INC KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST EIDEN C0N7TRUCT10N INC LINDSTRO.-. CONSTRUCTION DAHL STEVE CONST ARTEKA CORP EIDEN 350,000.00SISKA310,000.00HERNANDUn225,000.00 BECKER 21,500.00 STUBBS 1,000.00 r,UL 3,000.00 HENNINGSEN 79,000.00 LEINTZ 275,000.00 PAULUCCI 185,000.00 JOHNSON 3,500.00 RITTER 15,000.00 ERICJON 13,000.00 KNUTSON 9,000.00 ELLIS 8,260.00 MESSERICH 3,360.00 HUBBELL 640.00 COOPER 3,U00.00 REINHART 3.400.00 BEUTLER 1,000-00 FELDMAN 22,500.00 SKOOG 3,500.00 CLARK 2,000.00 KRAMER 15,000.00 GRAHAM 7,850.00 PARRISH 18,500.00 GRAY 21,507.00 EKHOLM 10,000.00 BOEHMER 2,460.00 ELLIS 1,600.00 SERAN .00 VICKERMAN .00 KNUTSON .00 JOHNSON 6,000.00 DELMORE 14,500.00 SUMNER 11,800.00 WILSON 49,466.00 JUNDT 600,000.00 20,000.00 BLACKSTONE 162,500.00 BRUNING 4,000.00 GUL 20,000.00 POPP .00 .00 HEIGHTS MECHANICAL FIRESIDE CORNER KRAEMER HEATING INC MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO FLARE HTG k AC KLEVE HTG k AC SLETTF.N COURNEYA 5.650.00 4.400.00 3.500.00 500.00 1.200.00 12.700.00 18.395.00 lU, JUL 13, 1995, 4il9 PM PAGB 2:rmits issued for tub month or:rmit work addr nbr street issued PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION35453797M H SEIFERT CONST 4,200.0036332561FIRESIDE CORNER 1.100.0036332561FIRESIDE CORNER 3,3'^0.0039414211KLEVE HTG k AC HFNNINGSEN 1,OOU.OO38847491DEL-AIR CONDITIONING INC DALI 650.00 27834545 ERICKSON PHC WILSON 1,235.00 34212419 KALMES MECHANICAL INC HEIDORM 450.00 38693213 MIDLAND HTG k AC INC SPOONER 8,000.00 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER SPENCER 1,624.00 38242656 STANDARD HTG k AC CO REJZER 1,000.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS STODDARD 400.00 34789558 DITTER INC OLSON 4,000.00 34920444 CRIGGS CONTRACTING SHULL 1,000.00 34745826 MESSENGER EXCAVATING INC CARPENTER 1,250.00 29332521 THOMPSON PLBG 14,000.00 29337200 CULLIGAN MEEK 136.79 28947600 LAKESIDE PLBG k HTG INC 19,100.00 27834545 ERICKSON PHC WILSON 4,490.00 27864007 SCHULTIES PLBG IIEIDORN 1,000.00 27839080 PLUMBING SERVICES INC BORN 200.00 24720805 ALS MASTER PLUMBING 700.00 24521565 WENZEL PLUMBING k ilEATING BECKER 500.00 22638236 JOHNSON RICHARD A LEE 500.00 29296767 NEU PLUMBING BRUNNING 1,600.00 29332521 THOMPSON PLBG 13,000.00 54287393 PATNODB BROTHERS SHANNON .00 54722316 COPPIN PLBG .00 54287393 PATNODE BROTHERS SLETTEN .00 54662667 DON'S BACKHOE EXCAVATING VALENTA .00 54662667 DON'S BACKHOE EXCAVATING JACOBSON .00 54425855 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES HARRINGTON .00 57237155 CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC .00 54208092 SCHMITZ JOHN P THOMPSON .00 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC DAYTON .00 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC DAYTON .00 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC DAYTON .00 88510942 MASTER SPRINKLER CAPELL .00 84792505 GENERAL SERVICE HARE .00 14721960 METZGER JEFFREY .00 OOUOOOOO MINNICH .00 00000000 NELSON .00 00000000 BAILEY .00 14730706 THREE STAR TRUCKING SUESS .00 88606418 IRRIGATION RESOURCES CORP GILLEN .00 iC 01010102 02 02 02 03 05 24 29 29 29 29 21C 01 01 01 01 02 02 19 24 24 24 29054502900975315 450 996 1385 1385 2715 2605 2601 1125 480 2905 2725 2900 450 996 1991 2420 3133 601 315 DEER RUN TR WCX)DHILL RD DEER RUN TR TONKAWA RD SILVER MEADOW DR WOODHILL RD NORTfi ARM DR ORONO LA ORONO LA CAROLINE AVB KELLY AVE WEST LAFAYETTE RD SPRING HILL RD RUSSELL AVE DEER RUN TR SHADYWOOD RD DEER RUN TR WOODHILL RD NORTH ARM DR FAGERNESS POINT RD SHADYWOOD RD CASCO CIR MINNETONKA HGLD LA SILVER MEADOW DR 95/06/2795/06/2795/06/2795/06/1995/06/20 95/06/23 95/06/28 95/06/14 95/06/16 95/06/19 95/06/05 95/06/13 95/06/19 95/06/29 OR-007102OR-007103OR-007104OR-007079OR-007084 OR-007097 OR-907109 OR-007056 OR-007070 OR-007003 OR-007024 OR-007050 OR-007081 OR-007112 95/06/02 OR-007018 95/06/07 OR-007034 95/06/16 OR-007067 95/06/16 OR-007068 95/06/02 OR-007019 95/06/29 OR-007111 95/06/21 OR-007086 95/06/09 OR-007041 95/06/16 OR-007072 95/06/20 OR-007085 24 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING 95/06/29 OR-007110 IC lie w 01 2760 WHITE OAK CIR 95/06/02 OR-006973 01 460 SUSSEX LA 95/06/12 OR-007008 01 4680 BAYSIDE RD 95/06/02 OR-007009 01 1160 TOWNLINE RD 95/06/13 OR-007010 01 4185 6TH AVE N 95/06/13 OR-007015 01 4080 BAYSIDE RD 95/06/09 OR-007046 01 2735 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 95/06/16 OR-007069 01 90 MYRTLEWOOD RD 95/06/16 OR-007071 01 990 OLD LONG LAKE RD 95/06/19 OR-007073 01 900 OLD LONG LAKE RD 95/06/19 OR-007074 01 965 OLD LONG LAKE PD 95/06/19 OR-007075 lie lie ID 01 650 GANDER RD 95/06/09 OR-007040 01 3020 SOMERSET LA 95/06/22 0.:-007096 22 3655 TOGO RD 95/06/12 OR-007049 22 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 95/06/13 OR-007054 22 500 TONKAWA RD 95/06/14 OR-007057 22 2807 CASCO POINT RD 95/06/15 OR-007063 22 2590 WATERTOWN RD 95/06/23 OR-007091 29 2860 DEER RUN TR 95/06/15 OR-007062nc0C »4C 2,633,623.79* 9999 01 Residence 2402Addition2503Garage/Attachedl 2604Garage/De tachedi 2705Porch28 06 Deck 29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 32 10 Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 34 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 r^emo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined LOCAL USB CODES Undefined Replacing ExistingLifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal ; _ ___ _ _ iCSlJ, JUL 3, -J95, 10:45 AM .’UMERICAL LISTING 1995ERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NDR STREET PAGE IWORKID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION>R-00fi960 R-004973 'R-007008 R-007009 •R-007010 R-007014 •R-007015 >R-007016 »R-007017 >R-007018 •R-007019 iR-007020 R-007021 ^R-007022 )R-007023 )R-007024 )R-007025 'R-007026 )R-007027 )R-007028 )R-007029 )R-007030 )R-007031 )R-007032 )R-00;033 'R-007034 )R-007035 )R-007036 )R-007037 )R-007038 jR-007040 >R-007041 OR-007042 OR-007043 ')R-007044 OR-007045 '.'R-00704G OR-007047 OR-007040 OR-007049 OR-007050 OR-007051 OR-007053 OR-007054 OR-007055 OR-007056 OR-007057 OR-007058 OR-007059 OR-007061 OR-007062 OR-007063 OR-00706G OR-007066 95/08/30 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/12 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/13 H 95/06/02 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/01 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/08 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/05 N 95/06/05 N 95/06/05 N 95/06/08 N 95/06/05 N 95/06/07 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/09 N 95/06/06 N 95/06/07 N 95/06/02 N 95/06/07 N 95/06/07 N 95/06/07 N 95/06/08 N 95/06/00 N 95/06/08 N 95/06/09 N 95/06/09 N 95/06/09 » 95/06/09 M 95/06/09 N 95/06/16 N 95/06/09 N 95/06/21 N 95/06/30 N 95/06/12 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/13 N 95/06/14 H 95/06/14 N 95/06/14 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/16 N 95/06/15 M 95/06/15 N 95/06/15 i: 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 2655 2760 460 4680 1160 3133 4185 4680 3131 2905 996 855 2920 2820 1006 2605 450 880 2440 3680 1400 4620 3340 2735 2800 2725 3780 345 32 31 24 75 650 3133 1310 200 2420 4465 4080 3195 2240 3655 2601 735 090 34 0 13 05 1305 500 315 855 97 5 2860 2807 1870 30 COUNTRYSIDE DR N 01WHITE OAK CIR 01 SUSSEX LA 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 TOWNLINE RD 01 CASCO CIR 02 6TH AVE N 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 CASCO CIR 29 DEER RUN TR 01 NORTH ARM DR 02 FARTENWOOD LA 33 FOX ST 02 DEER RUN TR 01 WILDHURST TR 01 KELLY AVE 29 WOODHILL RD 29 PARTENWOOJ RD 11 WATERTOWN RD 05 TOGO RD 06 BRACKETTS POINT RD 29 TONKAVIEW LA 01 WATERTOWN RD 06 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 29 SHADYWOOU RD 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 SPRING HIIX RD 09 CASCO CIR 06 DUNWOODY AVE 17 GANDER RD 01 CASCO CIR 24 REST PT LA 06 WAYZATA BLVD 19 WA'IERTOWN RD 04 FOREST LAKE LANDING 29 BAYSIDE RD 01 WATERTOWN RD 04 BAYVIEW PL 04 TOGO RD 22 WEST I.AFAYETTE RD 2 9 DICKEY LAKE DR 09 FOREST ARMS LA 09 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 22 NORTH fRM DR 06 ORONO LA 03 TONKAWA RD 22 SILVER MEADOW DR 29 PAKTENWOOD LA 02 TONKAWA RD 02 DEEP RUN TR 29 CASCO POINT RD 22 CTH AVE N 01 LUCE LINE RIDGE 02 • 5590251 54287393 54722316 54287393 54662667 14710532 54662667 34556323 00000000 29332521 27864007 19342000 00000000 19340461 36332561 34282826 19299646 17227129 19726025 00000000 17867711 34205871 00000000 00000000 00000000 29337200 35595900 15600103 ooooooao 00000000 88510942 24521565 00000000 00000000 00000000 15448761 54425855 14742130 00000000 14721960 34789558 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 38693213 00000000 15308479 12312231 14490866 88606418 00000000 13237466 15360277 EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC PATNODE BROTHERS COPPIN PLBG PATNODE BROTHERS DON’S BACKHOE EXCAVATING DANBERRY COMPANY DON'S BACKHOE EXCAVATING HEIGHTS MECHANICAL THOMPSON PLBG SCHULTIES PLBG ARTEKA CORP PETER ANDREA CO FIRESIDE CORNER PRACTICAL SYSTEMS BLESSING k ASSOC INC GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO MARK WACHOLZ CONSTRUCTION KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST KRAEMER HEATING INC CULLIGAN MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO ATLANTIS POOLS, INC. MASTER SPRINKI.EK WENZEL PLUMBING k HEATING LINDSTROM CONSTRUCTION SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES ARTISAN CONST k DESIGN METZGER JEFFREY DITTER INC EIDENSHANNON SLETi JN VALENTA BECKER JACOBSON SLETTEN SUMNER MTL^AND HTG 6 AC INC D\HL STEVE CONST GLACIAL RIDGES JUDD INTERIORS IRRK TION RESOURCES CORP KESLER CONST k DRY WALL LEINTZ JOE R 350,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 21.500.00 .00 5,650.00 11.800.00 14,000.00 HEIDORN 1,000.00 GUL 20,000.00 STUBBS 1,000.00 SISKA 310,000.00 4,400.00 STODDARD 400.00 WILSON 49,466.00 GRAY 21,507.00 F-LLIS 8,260.00 MESSERICH 3,360.00 JUNDT 600,000.00 COURNEYA 3,500.00 HUBBELL 640.00 500.00 20,000.00 MEEK 136.79 1,200.00 FELDMAN 22,500.00 COOPER 3,000.00 VICKFRMAN . 00 CAPELL . 00 BECKER 500.00 REINHART 3,400.00 .00 JOHNSON 3,500.00 DLACKSTONF,162,500.00 HARRINGTON .00 RITTER 15,000.00 ERICSON 13,000.00 .00 OLSON 4,000.00 SKOOG 3,500.00 CLARK 2,000.00 MINNICH .00 BEUTLER 1,000.00 SPOONER 8,000.00 NELSON .00 DRUNING 4,000.00 GUL 3,000.00 HENNINGSEN 79,000.00 GILLEN .00 BAILEY .00 HERNANDUS 225,000.00 uEINTZ 275,000.00 ION, JUL 3, 1995, 10.-45 AMrOMERICAL LISTINO JUMg 1995'■ERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 2WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNI;r t.AST NM VALUATION)R-007047)R-0070C« >R-007049 JR-007070 )R-007071 3R-007072 JR-007073 )R-007074 3R-00707S )R-007076 )R-007077 JR-007078 >R-007079 )R-007080 ^R-0070B1 :>R-007082 )R-007083 JR-007084 7R-007085 )R-007086 )R-007087 )R-007088 )R-007089 )R-007090 )R-007091 5R-007092 3R-007093 7R-007094 7R-007096 OR-007097 OR-007098 OR-007099 OR-007100 OR-007101 OR-007102 OR-007103 OR-007104 OR-007105 OR-007108 OR-007109 OR-007110 OR-007111 OR-007112 98C 95/08/16 N95/06/16 N95/06/16 N 95/06/16 N 95/06/16 N 95/06/16 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/19 N 95/06/20 N 95/06/20 N 95/06/21 N 95/06/21 N 95/06/21 N 95/06/22 N 95/06/22 N 95/06/23 N 95/06/26 N 95/06/22 N 95/06/22 N 95/06/22 N 95/06/23 N 95/06/26 N 95/06/26 N 95/06/26 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/27 N 95/06/27 N 95/06/27 N 95/06/28 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/28 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/29 N 95/06/29 M 29ro450 2735 1385 90 601 990 900 965 2760 2635 2630 975 2900 1125 2905 2715 315 315 2420 3615 2606 1305 4465 2590 538 3750 1995 3020 450 538 3115 4099 2440 2905 450 2900 2990 1645 1645 996 4465 1991 400 DEER RUN TRHCX)DIIILL RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W ORONO LA MYRTLEWOOD RD MINNETONKA HGLD LA OLD LONG LAKE RD OLD LONG LAKE RD OLD LONG LAKE RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W COUNTRYSIDE DR H COUNTRYSIDE DR W TONKAWA RD DEER RUN TR SPRING HILL RD DEER RUN TR CAROLINE AVE SILVER MEADOW DR SILVER MEADOW DR SHADYWOOD RD LYRIC AVE WEST LAFAYETTE RD SHORELINE DR BAYSIDE RD WATERTOWN RD RUSSELL AVE CASCO AVE WEST FARM RD SOMERSET LA WOODHILL RD RUSSELL AVE SUSSEX RD HIGHWOOl) RD WATERTOWN RD DEER RUN TR WOODHTLL RD DEER RUN TR SOMERSET LA BOHNS PT RD BOHNS PT RD NORTH ARM DR FOREST LAKE LAHDlNi EAGERNESS POINT RD RUSSELL AVE 01 289476000127834545 01 57237165 05 36332561 01 54208092 24 22638236 01 54734300 01 54734300 01 54734300 01 57237155 01 57237155 01 57237155 02 39414211 01 35421166 29 34820444 01 39414211 24 38242656 02 38847491 24 29296767 19 24720805 10 14717208 11 14724118 01 00000000 18 00000000 22 14730706 04 00000000 11 13237400 10 17297802 01 84792585 02 27834545 17 00000000 24 19275298 16 00000000 11 19726025 01 35453797 01 36332561 01 36332561 09 14761153 02 19430037 02 19430037 02 34212419 24 29332521 02 27839080 29 34745826 LAKESIDE PLDG 6 HTG INCERICKSON PNC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC FIRESIDE CORNER SCHMITZ JOHN P JOHNSON RICHARD A SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC KLEVE HTG 6 AC FLARE HTG i. AC GRIGGS CONTRACTING KLEVE HTG 6 AC STANDARD HTG t AC CO DEL-AIR CONDITIONING INC NEU PLUMBING ALS MASTER PLUMBING WINDOWS MIRRORS 6 MORE CONCEPT LANDSCAPING,INC. THREE STAR TRUCKING PTL CONTRACTING WESTWAY COMPANY GENERAL SERVICE ERICKSON PHC RUSS . BOB JOHNSON CONSTUC MARK WACHOLZ CONSTRUCTION M H SEIFERT CONST FIRESIDE CORNER FIRESIDE CORNER FOOL CONCEPTS JOHN KRAEMER 6 SONS IN^ JOJiN KRAEMER 6 SONS INC KALMES MECHANICAL *NC THOMPSON PLBG PLUMBING SERVICES INC MESSENGER EXCAVATING INC WILSON SPENCER THOMPSON LEE DAYTON DAYTON DAYTON El DEN El DEN EI DEN HENNINGSEN SHULL REJZER DALI DKUNNING GRAHAM EKHOLM POPP JOHNSON SUESS KNUTSON BOEHMER PARRISH HARE WILSON KNUTSON DELMORE SKRAN ELLIS KR.M'ER PAUl.UCCI PAULUCCI HEIDORM BORN CARPENTER 19.4.100490 1,624 500 1. 12, 1. 18, 1. 1. 7, 10. «. 9. 2. 18, 000 700 000 395 000 650 600 0000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 700.00 850.00 000.00 . 00 000.00 .00 000 460 500 1,235 14,500 1, 4, 1, 3. 15, 185, 185, 13, 1. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 600 200 100 300.00 000.00 000.00 000 00 450.00 000.00 200.00 250.00 ZONING PEFMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED JUNE 1995REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 )ATB OP RUN 07/03/9S * PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE 2 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 06/01/95 - 06/30/95 PREVIOUS RANGE - 06/01/94 - 06/30/94 ‘ERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Defined /ARIANCB :up ;KETCH PLAN ’.ub-total 6 3 1 10* 1,350.00 600.00 200.00 2,150.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 4 1 1 6* 600.00 175.00 200.00 975.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* trend-total 10**2,150.00**0.00**O.co**6**975.00**0.00**0.00*t REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/03/95 •* PERMIT FEE REPORT *• CITY OF ORONO FROM 06/01/95 TO 06/30/95 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 2,150.00 2 150.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 2,150.00 2,150.00 /\f.'Permits issuED/rtiSi colleoedtBPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 )ATB OF RUN 07/13/95 'ERMIT TYPE building GL FAMILY-NEW JUPLBX-NEW >P-ADD/REMODEL 5P-ACC STRUCTURE ')BMO/PRINCIPAL :OM-ADD/REMODBL OBMO INST-ADD/REMODEL ;P-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY I3EMO-ACCESSORY ^CC/GARAGES ’.ub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE ;hS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED .Sub-total Plumbiiv FIXTURE! WATER METER UNDEFINED .Sub-total 32 4 0 23 1 0 2 8 5 1 A, '9 .PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO YEAR-TO-DATC01/01/95 - 06/30/95 QTY B5SE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 16 24,862.75 4,879,878.00 16,160.81 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 114 28,997.25 3,474,810.00 16,091.62 15 2,682.50 336,900.00 1,689.0.’’ 7 380.00 0.00 0.00 7 2,420.50 382,542.00 111.15 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 1 56.75 1,800.00 36.89 1 72.00 5,000.00 46.80 1 0.00 550,000.00 1,423.18 3 90.00 0.00 0.00 4 811.50 52,225.00 527.48 170*60,403.25*9,683,155.00*36,086.95* 2,629.95 220.00 0.00 1,123.75 35.00 0.00 70.00 280.00 175.00 247.50 198,251 14,000 0 68,324 1,200 0 600 7,065 5,450 19.800 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 76*4,781.20*314,690.00* 57 4,391.53 306,411.79 2 314.00 0.00 1 35.00 400.00 60*4,740.53*306,811.79* Sewer 6 Water « r.EWER COHNECTIOH 2 70.00 u . uu WATER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 MEW SEPTIC SYSTE 13 1,300.00 0.00 IJRNFLD S./OR TANK 2 100.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 .SEWER (t WATER 1 70.00 0.00 .'■.ub-total 18*1,540.00*0.00 Sign PERMANENT/POSTED 1 35.00 1,500.00 PER./FREF. STANUG 1 35.00 400.00 TEMPORARY 1 30.00 0.00 Sub-total 3*10J.00*1,900.00 Fire _ FIREWORKS 3 150.00 u . uu 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ,00 ,00* 0.00 0.00o.co 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 QTY 18 1 96 11 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 9 146* 40 5 2 18 1 1 6 2 5 0 80* 65 7 0 72* 14 6 9 2 13 1 45* 2 1 2 5* REQUESTER I PAGE IPREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 06/30/94 BASE FEE VALUATION 14,352.00 5,478,720.00 15.00 500.00 14,715.00 1,650,207.80 939.00 76,300.00 310.00 •^.00 477.00 37,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 1,148.00 131,340.00 41,986.00*7,374,367.80* 3,783.00 288,550.00 195.08 11,901.00 116.25 9,100.00 1,140.00 78.389.16 35.00 1,15r.00 35.00 2,000.00 210.00 5,400.00 97.50 6,000.00 175.00 2,950.00 0.00 0.00 5,786.83*405,440.16* 4,581.73 310,455.86 1,285.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,866.73*310.455.86* 490.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 8,800.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 10,620.00*0.00* 70.00 0.00 39.00 1,200.00 60.00 0.00 169.00*1,200.00* 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 15,828.86 0.00 7,583.60 553.80 0.00 81.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 845.65 24,893.81* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00* 0.00 IRt PAGBt PEWCTS ISSUED/FEES COLUBCTED YEAR-TO-DATE.AN REVIEW15,826.860.007,583.60553.800.0081.900.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 845.65 24,893.81* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* BPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 >hTE OF RUN 07/13/95BRMIT TYPE total^ser Defined AND ALTERATION REE RBMOVmL BTAIN'NG WALLS .AWN SPRINKLER ‘ub* total .. •«.PERMIT ISSUED REPCRT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 06/30/95 REQUESTER I PAGE!-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 06/30/94DASE FEE 150.00*500.00120.00 100.00 105.00 905.00*VALUATION0.00*3.000. 00 0.00 0.00 0.003.000. 00*PLAN REVIEW 0.00* .'rand-total BASE FEE 0.00*300.00 60.000.00245.00 605.00*VALUATION0.00* 349**72,619.98** 10,309,556.79**36,086.95**362**65,033.56** 8,091,463.82** PLAN REVIEW 0.00*0.000.000.000.00 0.00* 24,893.81** P^MrrS ISSUED/FEES CXDLLEXTED YE7VR-T0-DATE REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/13/95 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN r.<MIT TOTAL * * * * •PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 06/30/95 PAGE: REQUESTER: BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER SIGN FIRE 60,403.25 4,781.20 4,740.53 1,540.00 905.00 100.00 150.00 36,086.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,573.85 159.48 156.56 9.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 oco0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r. .00 0.00 0.00 1,136.25 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.10 29.85 1.50 103,900.30 5,006 78 4, 926.94 1,649.00 908.00 100.00 150.00 0.00 »2»NINGPERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT mn. BPRMTISS-1 '3ATE OF RUN 07/03/95 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 06/30/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTYJser DefinedSUBDIVISIONv/ARIANCE >KBTCH PLAN /ARIANCE/CUP APPEAL Sub-total a2G9 4 2 1 50* 3.375.005.600.00 1.875.00 800.00 675.00 100.00 12,425.00* Srand-total 50**12,425.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 07/03/95 BASE PEE USER 12,425.00 REPORT TOTAL 12,425.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 HC. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 12,425.00 12,425.00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00* 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00* 626 9 2 3 0 46* 0.00**0.00**46** •• PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 06/30/95 * « « * « PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 06/30/94BASE FEE7.675.005.075.00 1.425.00 400.00 425.00 0.00 15,000.00* 15, 000.00* * VALUATION PLAN REVIEW00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00* 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00**0.00** PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 1995 RECAf> Of CONTRACT CITIESJanuary februiry Warch April June JulyPlan Review 0.00 5,416.77 2,016.97 0.00 2,027.67 4,543.35 14,005.26805.00Inspections225.00 210.00 75.00 180.00 90.00 195.00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00TOTAL250.00 5,651.77 2,116.97 205.00 2.142.67 4,763.85 15.130 26io. Plan Reviews 0 8 6 0 5 0.07 17 07ROe Inspections 15 14 5 12 6 13 65 Minnetonka Reach Plan Review 0.00 1,075.43 143.35 32.20 816.56 210.92 2.278 46Inspections135.00 45.00 105.00 45.00 75.00 135.00 540 00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00TOTAL160.00 1,145.43 273.35 102.20 916.56 370.92 2,968.46 9 0?No. Plan Reviews 0 1 3 1 4 0.02 MOe Inspections 9 Ain nn 3 7 5 ion i-> 3 5 9 w % VC 36 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 7-13-95 Officer Larry Tomcheck Acting Chief Gary Cheswick Letter of Ccmmendation It has come to my attention that you were never recognized by this department for life saving actions you took after witnessing a diving accident. On 6—24—94 at around 6:00 pm, while off duty boating on Lake Minnetonka in the area of Big Island, you became aware of a person who dove into shallow water injuring his neck and losing consciousness. You immediately retrieved the victim from the water and placed him onto the swim platform of a boat, stabilizing his neck to prevent further injury. You also performed mouth to mouth resuscitation and remained with him until Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol deputies and paramedics arrived to take over the care of the victim. It was because of the actions that you took, that the victim Mr. Lyn Severson did not sustain further life threatening injuries. I wish to commend you for your dedication to serving the public both on and off duty. cc: ;/'^rono Mayor and City Council Spring Park Mayor and City Council Long Lake Mayor and City Council Minnetonka Beach Mayor and City Council Orono City Administrator, Ron Moorse REQLTST FOR COUNCE. ACTION DATE: January 4, 1995 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hall in Title City Clerk AdrrJnistrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City AdminUlralor’s Report Item Description: Park Commission Liaison Schedule The following is a proposed schedule for CouncU attendance at the monthly Park Commission meetings during 1995. February 6th March 6th April 3rd Mav 1st June 5th Julv 3rd August 7th September 5th October 2nd November 6lh December 4th Mayor Callahan Councilmember Goetten Councilmember Jabbour Councilmember Hurr Councilmember Kelley Mayor Callahan Councilmember Goetten Councilmember Jabbour Councilmember Hurr Councilmember Kelley Mayor Callahan COLTsCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve schedule for Council attendance at the Park Commission meetings for 1995. Ayes__, Nays TO:Mayor and City Council FROM;Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:July 21. 1995 SUBJECT:Tom Barrett’s Father’s Illness Tom Barrett’s father has been diagnosed with lung cancer and will be undergoing surgery at the Mayo Clinic on Monday, July 24. Tom indicated they caught the cancer at an e^iy stage so that they are as optimistic as one can be when faced with this situation. Because Tom will be at the Mayo Clinic on Monday he will not attend the Council meeting. He has arranged for Kevin Staunton to attend the meeting. •‘r-i' ■r. • ‘ 'Vl .......................-........... .--.i......—A.V ?T. ■ kr wri pqpha m H aik 9CMNO0«<CM • KAWrfc*AH. LT®* Tit mm ^IT« %900 If NlN^M •T^ttT MlNMlA^tlS. MiNN«*OT* »»AO* Tf i. FAM •»••»»A'-aa»a LAlV’MVf ••••ANV T»w 01 i4#*a4i -4aiaAati STwrrAAAT. ,. FW4*«»4 Tik TM. 46A TO; Mike Goffron FAX NUMBER: 473*0510 PHONE NUMBER: 473*7357 FROM; Tom Baaeti PHONE NUMBER: 334-2676 authorization NUMBER: 9475 DATE: July 21, 1995 COMMENTS: V • Oo file NUMBER: 03643-001 NUMBER OF PAGES WITH COVER SHEET: 5 IF PROBLEMS. CALL Sue Neshcim AT: 334*2567 The inforraalion contained in this facsimile ‘“'“'"'j' 5^"'cadef o7utis"m" is""®' “>« address via Uie U.S. Postal Service. 0«:^2O59il5 7/21/93 NO. ordinance no -------------- LNTERIM OF } 462.355. SUBD. 4 PROHIBI^^ mLLNWABJ OR (C up /vaw ^nce ^pR ov ^ .the “hKv ^2 as DEFLVXD HERELV THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS; c»., .= « ..0,„,. — secna-J i. ........H nf F» s»“ ■■ «“• j “£s;—1. ,»-r^i'sisss is desirable Uia. the Couec 1 est^ private »ould undoubtedly "-’’f ' \i^ of preliminao' ^rmits for property w.thm the H^b y council former finds m enabling act. Mmn. Stat. 5 « i„div,dual development to occur cun y unwise, improper and unjust to ailo SECTION 2. the City of Orono boun^O by Old Crystal Bay Road on the west. , Uiis matter to the Planning SECTION 3. mrmplica'nrnVo^ potential need for SmSin^^s u, ihc'clty"^ m nnplemcnt the resuit-s of that study. OI2.'220S«S»» 1/2l«5 r f pfpliminarv <;nhdivisiQn made fof private driveways lo sen e two or more residence . cpmov 4 Duration . This Ordinance shall expire on SECTION 4. L>vr4U.v.fl ^iriier if the Council deicmunes that the r.vrie:V3etea"and f more than 18 addiUonal months. SECTION 5. M. if the Council finds after careful review ® it i^ compaUblc with the intent of the comprehensive comniunit> t^e City, that it does not zoning ^d citizens and that it otherwise meets the adversely impact the health, safu^y requircnwnu o( the Orono City Code and sute law. section 6. SStdI»- oTpSiCyt^oSECTION 6. Sgpara&imy- ifrrot ^ ____________or n^iTt.any other sccUon, provision, or part. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be published In the Lake Minnetonka Sun and Shull be effective immediately. Adopted by the City Couneil of the City of Ucono on the __ day of 1995. by u vote of__ ayes and ___ nays. Ldwuid J. Callahan. Jr. - Mayor ATTEST; City Clerk 0*2/220118017/2) ^>5 r ORDINANCE NO. INTERIM G^^G^OF S'^f^wSS^RMORB residences. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: M„». 0.« .<» C, .. 0.» ^« r ThP Citv Council Ends ihai the City is SECTION 1. ltit»rn(tnl PQbC^- roads and driveways which serve Ki's.s™ s‘S.p; .»• “ “ •' ”■ •' ” u„der zoning codes Secuoj«^ S,,0ons 11.03; U-IO. U.32.and which may also imphcate me v.iu 11.33 that would allow .such roads. cS'To‘*eV''’n>cse of ihe CounS further finds Thclefort. Uie CouncU's „„,side SECTION 2. SUiiE- ^“tplSns o[ to "or^ri^ Comntosion to initiate J -f S.nt:r.to r-dc -o in,pien.en. the resuto of iha. stud,. 08:/220»BBO» SECTION4. Bi-nriniftnion ^toaiy subdivision CouncU to sny propeny «.thm to Budding Pcnnit JI”Highway U Corridor as defined herein.orridor as defined herein. SECTION5. Camim. tew'undfde"te”»>“*« ’ . „ withoui Council aciion. or juopad and tot 4PP'°P"*“ ’ this Ordinance may be extcndeu oy «u more than 18 addiiional months. ^ . * SECTION 6. MSS. =HS^|5«HSS=:«« adversely impact to he . J requirements of the Orono City Cooc * CP -ris>•“—“ - “ ““ any other section, provision, or part. and shall he effective immediately. " ,Ud by to City Cou.fi Of to City Of Oiono on to 1995. by a vote of _ nvo and _ nays. Ed^d J. Callahan. Jr. • Mayor ATfEST; City Clerk 0^2/2208^80» 7/2b^5 1 lt« «IHtM IH MM J