Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-10-1995 Council Packet
r (♦) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are avaUable in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL •1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦2. Regular Meeting of June 26, 1995 --rtCIl MEETING JUL 10 1995 C'TY Of ORONO PARK COMMISSION CO^LMENTS PLANTMING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandra Smith Representative PUBLIC COiVLMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) THSESear sis 5! #2021 James Brace/James Hale, 575 Oxford lu- '..: and 565 U-at Streel - Subdivision of a Lot 6 #M25''MTh"k. dtrSMu" Walertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 7 #7029 William F. Smith, 2580 Fox .Street ■ Preliminary Subdivision ■ Resolution s!#2030 Richard UVere, 995 Wildhurrt Trail - Variances - Resolution 9.North Shore Marina - Clubhouse Sewer Connection MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 10.Request for Payment #7 - Navarre Lift Station Renovation CITY ADMLNISTRATOR’S REPORT 11.Resolution Calling for Willow Drive Improvement 12.Award Bid - Willow Drive Improvement 13.Preliminary Plans for County Road 15 - Resolution 14.Appointment ol Acting Police Chief 15.1994 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 16.Schedule ’96 id.’ct Work Session 17.National N'cli' < ' •» - Proclamation 18 Retirement 'V a\ lie Quast 19.Temporary Employment at Golf Course CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*20.) LICENSES (*21.) BILLS I UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 07/04 - 07/10 - 07/10 - 07/11 - 07/12 - 07/13 - 07/17 - 07/19 07/20 07/24 07/27 HOLIDAY - Independence Day (Tuesday) Orono School Administrative meeting 4:00 p.m. (1 hour) -Council meeting 7:00 p.m. -Orono School Board 4:15 p.m. -Neighborhood Sewer Information Meeting 7:00 p.m. -Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. (Thursday) -Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. -Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. -Neighborhood Sewer Information Meeting 7:00 p.m. -Council meeting 7:00 p.m. -Neighborhood Sewer Information Meeting 7:00 p.m. i [ PLANNING COMMISSION (^COUNCIL y 1 ''1PUBLIC ATTENDANCE i MEETING DATE ”7 *“ t 0 ‘ ^1' PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. w^2.R' - - - - - - - - - - - - - -—- - - - - - - 3 - 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. i 9. 10. 11. 12 . 1 ^ . 14. IS, 16. 17. 1 fi 1 Q - on : L.. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 26,1995 ua^.cETirjii^. JUL 1 0 1995 ROLL CITY OF ORONO The Council met on the above date with the following membets present: Mayor Edward Callahan, Jr. and Council Members J. Diann Goetten and Gabriel Jabbour. Council Members Charles Kelley and JoEUen Hurr were absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator NCchael Gaflfron, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (•#1) CONSENT AGENDA Items #8, n, 14, and 15 were added to the Consent Agenda. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to jg>prove the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#2) 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - WILLOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENT Cook reviewed the plans to reconstruct Willow Drive along Hwy 12 to 500 ’ north of Hwy 12, which will eventually tic in with the proposed frontage road. This project includes concrete curb and gutter with a turn lane at Willow to mirror design for Willow on the south side of Hwy 12. There will be two lanes, along with the turn lane, and a right turn lane into the nursery. Cook said the original proposal called for the improvement to end beyond the Otten drive. This has been extended to clear the Otten property. Lower cost options were considered but concern was with the hca\7 traffic emering and leaving the nursery. The cost of the original plan was estimated at $130,000. To scale back to the $100,000 amount would mean the improvement would not extend to the Otten driveway. 'fhe project cost is $157,692. The plan is to assess 25%, or $39,423, to the adjacent property owners on both side of the road. An amount of $19,7! 1 will be assessed to each of the benefited properties Callahan asked for clarification of the right turn lane from Hwy 12 to Willow. Cook said there will be a single lane on Willow, with a left turn lane for the signal, and a thru lane to go south or to the west. There would be a thru lane with a right lane into Otten's nursery 1 he road would taper off to the normal width of the road. There would be no acceleration lane coming out of the Otten property. Those vehicles would go into traffic immediately. ?Q0 f -> MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26, 1995 jj ^ (#2 - WiDow Drive Improvement - Continued) Moorsc noted the purpose of this meeting was to receive input from the public on the project only Discussions and decisions regarding assessments would be done at the assessment hearing scheduled for a later date. A 4/5th m^ority vote is needed to adopt the resolution. With only three members present, this cannot be accomplished at this time. Cliff Ottcn said not talking about costs when talking about the project is not a good idea. He felt it was r good project. Otten noted that Widow Drive is a major connector with Brown Road ending at Hwy 12 and at CoRd 6 and Old Crystal Bay Road ending at CoRd6. Otten felt only two owners being assessed is harsh It was his opinion that Willow is in need of repair along its entire length from Hwy 12 to County Road 6 Otten felt all of Willow should be reconstructed and costs of the entire improvement be spread to all the owners. He also noted that the Brown Road improvement was MSA funded, but no assessments were done. Callahan said Ottcn's points were reasonable and would be considered. In asking if the project was okay, Otten said he felt it was grander than he expected it to be. Cook said a decision on the resolution should be made by the second meeting of the Council in July. Lois Matheson, 900 Willow Drive, located halfway between Hwy 12 and CoRd 6, asked if the improvement would extend to her residence. Callanan said the current project only extends 650* from the intersection of Hwy 12 and Willow Drive. The projected improvements for the portion of WUlow extending to her residence is several projetns down on the City's priority list of improvements. (#3) INTERVIEW PARK COMMISSION APPLICANTS IRENE SILBER Callahan asked Silber if the Saga Hill preserv ation issue was why she applied for the Park Commission. Silber said she was concerned that this would be the Council's opinion but said it was not necessai:!y so J m MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 (#3 - Park Interv'iews - Silbcr - Continued) Goetten asked if her philosophy concerning Saga Hill extended to all of Orono Silber said she is in favor of open space whenever appropriate but recognizes the need for recreation and development. Her philsophy is a balanced use. She understood the Park Commission's duties are one of serving and making recommendations to the Council, who are the decision makers. Goetten asked if she had any recommendations now. Silber noted the need to work with private land owners with large tracts of land, who would be willing to donate gifts of land w hen they die Silber believes in investing the time now for future payoff She also recommended the park fund be used conserv'atively. Silber said the Council ’s openness to creating open land such as Saga Hill is important. ANDREW MCDERMOTT McDermott presented a resume to the Council McDermott was asked why he made the change in application from the Planning Commission to the Park Commission McDermott said he originally saw the growing pains of the City and the surge of growth and thought this would be the best way to serve. He then learned more about the parks, looked at all of them, and decided on applying for the Park Commission McDermott said he has attended accessibility classes regarding the ADA, which he feels is a needed skill. He also has a background in park planning and design and has designed wildlife refuges. He is not familiar with the comprehensive plan but has read the park survey. He is an 8 year resident of Orono and works with the Department of Interior. McDermott said he looked at the parks and received a good report. He saw that while they were maintained, the parks had not improved. With development coming to Orono. McDermott sees changes and improvements will be needed. This is part of his work. Goetten noted the problem of money to make improvements. McDermott said the influx of new residents w ould bring more money in. He did not necessarily see the need to expand the park land area but trails and other passive areas should be added. Jabbour said the survey reflected the philosophy of the comprehensive plan and asked McDermott's opinion of the surv'ey. McDermott said he agreed w ith the passivity concept noting the availabilhy of recreational activities within the County parks. He remarked on the large differences between the northern and southern parts of the City. He fiund no problem with the recreational parks being located in other areas and saw them as complementary. MDOJTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 (#4) INTERVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS ELIZABETH WRIGHT Wright was asked why she applied for the opening. Wright said she has been an architectural engineer for 11 years and has dealt with many city councils within the metropoliur area. She has seen many differences between cities and could bring this knowledge to her home area. Callahan noted the unicjuencss of Orono with its zoning hardcover thrust, and less issues of planning houses. Wright has not attended a Planning Commission meeting and has briefly looked at the Comprehensive Plan commenting on its strictness. Goetten informed Wright that the City looks for its future leaders from the commission. Goetten emphasized the zoning issues and the lake’s importance with 40?'o of the shoreline within Orono. Wright said she lives on Lake Minnetonka and has heard the "bullets", as she described it, concerning the City's strict ordinances, from neighbors. She said she has the time for this commitment and loves to do rese^ch. Wrigln saw the philosophy of development as having alot of objectivity and fairly stable. She said she is interested in other areas of the City but is :.ot familiar with the rest of the community. She noted the lack of intense development, and the need to keep this at bay. ELIZABETH HAWN Hawn is a new resident of Orono but feels she can offer her expertise as a mediator and lawyer in dealing with conflicts needing resolution. Hawn feels she understands the issues and can bring a measure of fairness to the advisory board. She would like to perpetuate what she likes about the City saying she has felt good about what she has seen. Her home is located on the property proposed as the north route of Hwy 12. She previously lived in the Kenwood area since 1979 but her daughter has been involved in sports in this area Hawn has not attended a Planning Commission meeting or looked at the Comprehensive Plan Hawn feels she is here as a learner. She has read about the City in the Pioneer newspaper. She says she has the time to commit to the commission and feels doing your homework on issues is important in order to accomplish anything at the monthly meetings. Jabbour asked if the Hwy 12 issue was what brought Hawn to apply for the position. Hawn responded in the negative adding that the issue would outlive her She saw the issues as being more of a City under pressure from the urban areas. She felt the demographics need to be looked at and discussed with the need for low income housing Other issues HawTi saw' as imponant are water quality and Hwy 12. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 RICHARD MCFARLAND McFariand was asked why he applied for the Planning Commission. McFi^and said he has had many discussions about the Orono growth verais the growth in Minnetonka with a past Minnetonka mayor. His background is construction and feels he can offer some positive direction. McFarland has lived in the area all his life noting his grandfather fanmd in the area. He sees Orono as having a tough, uphill road ahead with the highway issue, sewering, and additional homes. Jabbour asked McFarland how he felt Orono has been doing NicFarland said fine but the pace will need to be changed. Orono needs to see how it fits in with the encroaching urbanization, the issues with the Met Council, and MSA and work through the logistics. McFarland says a certain degree of uevelopment will be done Even with restraints on development, McFarland feels some will come He does not recommend de\’elopment but understands the pressure the City is under to develop. McFarland noted similar growth patterns in other cities he has worked with in Washington County. McFarland is somewhat familiar with the Comprehensive Plan as an overview. He has not attended any Planning Commission meetings. KEVIN DULIN Dulin said he has a vested interest in the area and serving in a civic manner. He previously lived in Independence and plans for Hwy 12 ran through his property. He now lives on Lake Minnetonka Dulin said his experience in management and plaiming would aid the Planning Commission. He has received a legacy of Planning Commission meetings from his neighbors with such issues as hardcover. When asked about the Comprehensive Plan, Dulin said he has browsed through it and sees the Orono philosophy as one of uniqueness with it's ruralncss, yet close in with Hwy 12 and Interstate 394 The Orono philosophy is what Dulin said drew him He sees a need for balance, and a need to control and retain the natural resources Dulin noted how Orono was located between city and rural, contains large amounts of lakeshore, the H^ 12 issue, and the influx of ^uent residents and their influence in what is being built. Jabbour asked if the City development philosophy is conducive to Dulin's philosophy. Dulin said it wall affect him but shares the sense of being careful and maintaining a balance He noted development moving west and subdivisions being built. He mentioned the differences in views in how development is handled bertween Orono and Delano. Dulin said he is sensitive to needs. Through his work with Orono Hockey and especially try outs, he has had to field phone calls and has learned to listen without necessarily having to make a commitment He noted his appreciation of all the individuals who have contributed to Orono Hockey. Large donations have been made, and Dulin sees the proposed hockey rink as a reality. MDnrrES of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 MILTON BIX Bix said he b a scmi-rctircd attorney, which he describes as working only a normal five day work wedc. Bix has been involved in City goverran«t through the Minnellis Planning Commission and the Golden Valley City Council. Bix sees this experie^e u an asset for thb application He is concerned about the future of Orono in maintaining itself as a residential community. Bix moved here after his wife died in 1992 because of Orono's reputation as a low-density, large lot residential area with good schools and good transportation to the downtown area. Bix said Orono has lived up to his expectations. Bbc has seen the Coi ,. _ _ open spa m, wetland protection, and low-density. He is concerned witti Mn/DOT and the Hwy 12 issue. Bix feels he has the time to commit to the commission and the background necessary for the position. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (•#5) REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 12,1995 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 12,1995. Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Richard Flint informed the Council that the Park Commission would like to nominate two Friends of the Park Awards to Girl Scout Troops 1210 and 1900 for their work at French Creek Preserve and to the Orono Baseball Orgaitization for their fund raising efforts and building of the new facilities for the basebaU organization. Flim would like these awards presemed in August as many of the girl scouts are seniors, who have recently graduated, and will be moving on to coll'.ites. The Council was in favor of this suggestion and will work with the Park Commission on the timing for and presentation of the awards. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Planning Commission was presen: at the meeting. I minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 PUBLIC COMMENTS Page, 3493 Crystal Place, Navarre, asked the Council to look into the increase of traflRc from CoRd 15 onto Navarre Avenue and Cr> stal Place Traffic has been congested in the area resulting in a back up of traffic to the Spring Park stop sign west on CoRd 15, especially during the rush hour traffic between 4; 15-5 30 p m Dnvers have begun to turn onto these residential streets to avoid the traffic congestion Recent accidents have brought the question of safet>- to the forefront of the people m the neighborhood. Page would like to see stop signs installed to slow this traffic down, naming Livingston and Navarre Lane as a good intersection at which to install a sign ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#6) #2023 BETTY SUMNER, 3131 CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCE • RESOLUTION #3571 Mrs. Sumner was present. Mabusth reponed that the applicant’s property has excess of hardcover in the 75-250' zone. There is major driveway paving, a portion of which serves neighbors property. The applicant would like to make paving improvements over the patio areas, where plastic.s and chips are presently There would be no increase in hardcover, but the non-structural hardcover will become more permanent. The hardcover calculations consist of 750 s.f for paving areas, with 612 s.f, or 3.4% of total, located beneath the deck already, and 138 s.f. located adjacent to the garage door, serving as an area for maintenance equipment. Goetten asked what the hardship is for this request. Mabusth said there are limited hardcover improvements (drive, residence, walkway) on the property and applicant proposes no increases. Goetten said the Council would normally ask for removal of other hardcover when excesses occur. Mabusth said all the landscaping areas underlain with plastic have been removed prior to hardcover inventory. If this had not been done the hardcover figure would have been much higher Goetten asked about the driveway. Mabusth said there is no change in this area. Exhibit D shows the driveway at 3600 s.f., which includes a portion used by the Becker/Marchessault property and a portion serving the house to the west. Mabusth noted the steep topographies within the drive area. MINtJTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 (#6 - #2023 Betty Sumner - Continued) Jabbour asked for confirmation that the hardcover beneath the deck was already hardcover. Mabusth agreed, adding that the paving makes the non-structural hardcover more permanent. Callahan questioned, since plastic should not be there in the first place, what makes it right to pave it now? Mabusth's responded that is why the applicant has been asked to file a variance application. She noted 612 s.f of the total 750 s.f. ot paving IS located completely beneath the deck. Jabbour noted that he could not see giving the deck itself up, so whether the hardcover is concrete, or otherwise, does not make a difference. Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to approve Resolution #3571 per the Planning Commission recommendations. Ayes 2, Nays 1, Goetten (#7) #2024 JAMES WILSON, 2565 LYDIARD AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3572 The application is for a CUP to allow the continued residential use of the property considered a non-conforming use in the B-4 commercial zone. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3572 per the Planning Commission recommendation. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (•#8) #2027 RICHARD LEE KAIL, 3753 CASCO AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3573 Mayor Callahan asked for clarification whether the Applicant had an updated certified survey, which Mabusth responded to the affirmative. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3573. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#9) DRAFT LETTERS TO POTENTIAL SEWER NEIGHBORHOODS - CONRRM DATES Gaflfron reported Goetten and he had recently attended a meeting of the Webber Hills neighborhood to discuss the possibility of sewering that particular area in the future. As MUSA amendments are only being approved for projects through the year 2000, Gaffion said it was difficult to decide whether to alert neighborhoods about the possibility of sewer when projects would more than likely extend beyond that time period. It was concluded that these meetings were necessary to facilitate the residents’ thinking about the possibility. 8 i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 (#9 - Sewer - Continued) Staff would like to apply to the Met Council for future sewer projects. Jabbour suggested scheduling all possible projects for completion within the five year time span allowed by MUSA, knowing that they would not necessarily come to be in that time frame. If the Council agreed with the drafted letters and the proposed meeting dates, Gaffron would proceed to send out the letters Goetten recommended proceeding. Jabbour agreed and suggested elaborating on paragraph 3 of the North Long Lake letter unde-'’ "Why Are Municipal Sewers Being Considered?". The letter speaks of 70% of exisun^ septic systems would need to be upgraded. Jabbour felt the residents should be inlo*^ ^ .cd on what would prompt a failing system, i.e. a new mortgage or selling of the propeny. in order not to duplicate a resident from paying for a new system along with the cost ot sewering. Jabbour emphasized the City’s desire to work with the residents on this issue. Jabbour also emphasized the importance of residents knowing that, even if systems are not inspected, there are triggers in place to cause a failing system to be upgraded. Goetten asked that it be made clear about the 3' separation from the seasonal high water table, and why a residence would need to ccme on line. It was decided that this would be embellished upon at the meeting to clarify any misunderstandings. Callahan agreed on the need to proceed. Dates of meetings were discussed. Moorse will post the dates of the meetings and notify Council. GaflS-on will send the mailings to the residents two weeks prior to a meeting. MAYOR/COUNCEL REPORT Jabbour informed members of the press to note the bill passed on the House floor allowing the DNR to sell the land on Maxwell Bay. Jabbour asked Staff to e.vtend gratitude to Representative Todd VanDellen and Senator Gen Olson for their efforts regarding this bill. Jabbour relayed information on the LMCD budget. The LMCD promised to bring reserves to a 6-month operating level. The present budget does not reflect this promise, and Jabbour said his concerns were dismissed when voiced. Jabbour said many do not understand the purpose of the LMCD. It was noted that the surface management was conducted by the Hennepin County Water Patrol, who are budgeted through the County. Special event licensing and permits are also taken care of by Hennepin County, along with the dredging of channels and placement of buoys. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26, 1995 (Mayor/Council Report - Continued) The responsibility of milfoil harvesting is that of the LMCD, but it was noted, of the harvesting machines used, the harvester supplied by Hennepin County is considered the best piece of equipment. Jabbour believes the LMCD’s budget should reflect the LMCD's extremely defined and narrow responsibilities. The funding is received quarterly and up front. No State aid is involved. Jabbour questioned the function of their reserve, which went up not down. The turnover of employment was notcu as close to 100%. Concern was also expressed regarding the fund allocations. Jabbour believes the funds available should be used towards the '95 budget. Callahan said there should be no need to collect funds this year and saw no reason to approve their budget, as it was in excess of what it should be. and did not do what it was intended to do. Jabbour noted that the cover letter concerning the LMCD said they are continuing to seek funding by changing legislation. This was seen as a problem, since the only changes allowed regarding water issues are done through the DNR. The Council decided to object now to the LMCD budget, which is to be acted upon at their June 28 meeting. Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to ofiRcially express the City's objections to the LMCD budget. Ayes 3, Nays 0. ENGINEER REPORT City Engineer Cook had no report CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#10) REQUEST FOR OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Moorse reported on the request for an off-sale liquor license for William Wear at the Orono Shopping Center at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard. The ordinance allows for two off- saJe licenses in the City; one is presently in operation in Nav.irre There are parameters within the ordinance that state an ofl-sale liquor establishment may not be located within 1/2 mile of another off-sale liquor establishment. While the two establishments within Orono are farther away than this minimum, the proposed location is across the street from a Long Lake ofl-sale establishment. Moorse asked for Council's direction on whether to move ahead with the background investigation or if there was a need for additional information or the need for discussion. H?. MINUTES OF Tffi REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 (#10 - Off-Sale Liquor Licoisc - Continued) Jabbour received clarification that the liquor license is given to the person, not to the location itself. It was noted that there arc only a few areas that would qualify for an off- sale estabtishment. Goetten expressed her concern over liquor store locations being within such a close proximity to each other. Jabbour said there are three Uquor stores wthin one-half mile Callahan said if the other Council Members were not in favor of this location, a background investigation would not change the situation. Moorse quesUoned whether the City should proceed with the application, considering the costs to the City and applicant for this process, if the Council gives direaion not to approve the license. Moorse said he would contact Mr. Wear and inform him that the Counctfs reaction to the application was not favorable and ask if Wear would like to proceed with the applicati process. lion CaUahan said no formal action would be taken on the matter, since two members were absent, but the general consensus was unfavorable. (#11) PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD 15 - RESOLUTION Moorse reported that the County is in need of a formal resolution regarding the preliminary plans for County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road. It was noted that the costs are now available for the right-of-way acquisitions. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to table the resolution until all members of the Council are present. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#12) CITY FACILITIES LANDSCAPING nNAL PAYMENT Jabbour questioned if the warranty on the land.scape plantings extended fi'om the d^e on which the plantings were replaced. This was confirmed. Moorse said all landscaping has been planted, re-planted, or is growing well. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the final payment to Midland Nursery, Inc., in the amount of $10,884 for landscaping of the City facilities project. Such payment is to be made form the Building Outlay Fund and a budget appropriation for that amount is hereby approved. Ayes 3, Nays 0. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTT\ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26, 1995 (•#13) TRANSFER OF FUNDS CDBG Jabhour moved, Goetlen seconded, to direct Staff to notify Ht rmepin County Planning and Development that the balance in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Connection Grant Program of $20,148 be transferred to Housing Rehabilitation. Ayes 3. Nays 0. (•#14) REQUEST BY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO DISPOSE OF POLICE SQUAD Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the sale of the police squad vehicle to the highest bidder as per City ordinance. Ayes 3, Nays 0 (•#15) ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the acceptance of the donation of a mountain bike to the Orono Police Department from Mr. Peter WeUs, and to express the appreciation of the Council and the Police Department to Mr. Weils for the donation Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#16) EMPLOYMENT MATTER Jabbour moved, Gcenen seconded, to accept the resignation of Police Chief Sullivan and to approve payment of the proposed severance package. Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett had no report at this time. (*#17) LICENSES There were no license applications. (•#18) BILLS Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, Nays 0. 7%^t:?MINUTES OF THr REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 ADJOURNMENT Callahan adjoumtd the meeting at 9; 10 p.m. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST; 'Dorothy M. Hallin, City' Clerk >· .. ..,, � PJUM.111[!1U''41( � rn---- 1 4 MtfEmlSTA 0 ., .. 6 ' MEDtNA "'. 800 6 W --I� i �:It ��� .... __..�-cl it£: r I �I I. rm ♦. ' i I -cm- I� 11' �E\\f f � ---.��- �-&£:� 7-AS✓---- ♦ ··"" I� I l I I I i �� u•£•t::• t l I I 3200 I I · · I -,.;i, -;v =' , · -·· l I � -I ---·· I . ·J=xi · --4S5 -I�A�e�c•o�E�F�G�H�1�J K 400 L 0 • City of Orono Street taDJM'IIIPVI •• Nli1nesota Map �.o,! t: B-.-s:.�......... IL,_.-■■--A narlh !!Hi !!il.lZ' � 4,1990 ,. ........ ..... f.-& .. �---- .,,., --S.1 J41,cJD.-.,. ···-.... ,,. 7 9 10 2800 11 3200 A .. I • .., ,. r m «»« ^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUL 1 0 1995 DATE: smtiimuQ ITEM NO.:x,» 3 Departnwnt Approval: Naaic Jeanne A. Mabusth THIc Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2005 SaUors World Marina. 1955 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning District: B*2 Total area = 31,217 s.f. Pertinent Sections of the Code Please refer to the staff memo of April 10, 1995 enclosed in your packet for more detail and background on this review. Staff has included a copy of the amended B-2 ordinance enclosed as Exhibit J in your packet. Brief Description of Request The application involves a conditional use permit for a boat club/time share use per the new B-2 ordinance. Section 10.41, Snbd. 7 (A) specifically specifies that all landscaping/ screening requirements of this section mast be in compliance before a conditional use permit can be issued. Refer to Exhibit J, the City holds a Developer’s Agreement and Letter of Credit to ensure that the approved landscaping plan will be installed. Unfortunately, the applicant has had many delays because of the disruption created on site as marina attempts to rid itself of pollution problems. Mr. DeSantis has advised that the landscaping should be completed by the end of this summer. Refer to Exhibit B, applicant has provided a parking needs analysis and comparison tor both slip rental and boat club uses. The Planning Commission appreciated the analysis provided by applicant as members noted their lack of knowledge of a boat club operation. The applicant has advised that he has operated a boat club at a 50 member level for the past three years without any problem. He asks that the conditional use permit be approved to allow a 100 member level, although he planned to increase to a 60 member level for the current 1995 season. A Councilmember in attendance advised Planning Commission members that if applicant sought a 100 member level with this conditional use permit that applicant be required to provide annual proof that he maintains 25 off-site parking stalls to support intensification m use Members concurred finding that as long as the City was assured ot additional parking on site that a 100 member boat club would be feasible. Members did reserve the right to review the parking needs if problems would arise in the future. J Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 June 29, 1995 Zoning File #2005 The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission’s unanimous recommeralation of approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 7 (A) FILE NO. 2005 WHEREAS, Gary DeSantis of Sailors World Marina and Yacht Club, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter the "applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1955 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to permit a boat club use at 100 members per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File M2005. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District. The property consists of 31,217 s.f. 3.On June 19, 1995 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: a.There are 41 parking stalls on site. In the past year, applicant has had to provide 8 stalls for a boat sales use. The only retail operation at the facility is a ship’s store that serves slip rental customers and boat club members. Page 1 of 4 1 » b.Applicant’s analysis and comparison of parking needs for annual slip rental or boat club uses suggests the element of flexibility makes it far easier to handle the limited parking facilities with a boat club operation. c.For the past three years, applicant has made arrangements for additional off-site parking on weekends to serve the needs of Lhe marina. d.The City has received no complaints from adjacent residents concerning parking problems within the immediate neighborhood. e.Applicant has operated a 50-55 member boat club for the past three years without any report of parking problems. 4.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a boat club use at the marina will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby erants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A) to permit a boat club use at Sailors World Maiina and Yacht Club, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon application for the annual commercial marina license, applicant shall provide written corfirmation that marina has 25 off-site parking stalls. The City further reserv'es the right to reconsider parking requirements if Lhe City staff finds or receives reports from residents of parking inadequacies at the marina. Page 2 of 4 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title ot the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of July, 1995 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall in. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 y S'r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoine instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of July,^94. by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City ol Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf ot the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public withinand for said County, personally appeared----------------------------------^^----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (Uieir) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOT.\ ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of . 199 . before me a Notary' Public within and for said County, personally appeared-------------------^^ known to me to be the person! s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Paee 4 of 4 iAr.j-.3-- -octicn of the Ncrth^line Ccnrie.ncinc at v'f rjicerly tiqht-oi-way i--‘S ^°*-.actual oy.tenced r.as--------- ,decrees i=East -.----- Whence ^hi^ce'South 57 -Tthe -®- coint of ^-7-‘:*I*‘.;^Zoos 50 -i.^utss -as - -- _ ■whence her--. -- T-honce Uortn .: • oe------, r-onu® e.xcenae- -as *•? decrees -- o'-= North line of ^ranc Z thence Sournwes-^-^-^^j P_:^K k” Sicrees 45 mi-nutes .es beci.nninq incyac^-bhe ninutes He.nr.e?i-n County,.n-s preoerty"); and To: From; Date: Subject: 5. Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 10, 1995 #2005 Sailors World Marina. 1955 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing inning District: B-2 Pertinent Sections of (he Code 1. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 25,117 s.f. Approved hardcover per Resolution No. 2891 = 15,862 s.f. or 63.4% 75-250’ setback area = 6,100 s.f. Existing = 5,100 s.f. or 83.6% Section 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A) - Conditional use permit required for boat club (time share use) Section 10.41, Subdivision 8 (A-I) - Parkir.g requirements. Refer to Exhibit E, 1995 License Application. Required parking A.8 stalls for retail use B.45.6 or 46 stalls per 76 slips (excluded 3 slips - 1 company boat. 2 listed as other; license shows 10 slips for boat club and 66 rental slips) Total stalls required = 54 Existing =41* *Approved per .Application #1947 - Resolution No. 3478 (Refer to Exhibit H, additional parking is provided on weekends at the Minnetonka Art Center.) List of Exhio ts A B C D E F G Application Applicant ’s Addenduii Plat Map Property Owners’ List 19‘>5 License Application Site Plan Parkine Plan for Art Center I Zoning File #200$ April 10, 1995 Page 2 of 3 H - Resolution No. 3478 Approving Variance for Storage Module and Loss of One I . Approved Landscape Plan - Approved with Comprehensive Variance and Commercial Site Plan Application J - B-2 Ordinance 1-23-95 Description of Request Gary DeSantis of Sailors World is the first of our marina owners to file a conditional use perm it for boat club use under your new ordinance. Please refer to Exhibit B. the applicant s addendum that provides much needed background on the boat club use Applicant has also provided an analysis of parking needs based on the season, element of weather and days of week. As for staff, it has been very helpful and is unfonunate that we did not have this kind of input at the time we discussed the use during the ordinance amendment hearings. Planning Commission members may have been able to develop additional standards that would have assisted future applicants and the City in the review of similar conditional use permits. The ordinance does list two standards that must be addressed with the conditional use permit. The first is landscaping. Review Exhibit I. Members may remember that an appro\e landscape plan already exists and was developed at the time of the comprehensive land use review for the redevelopment of the marina property. The City currently holds a Developer s Agreement and Letter of Credit to cover the required landscaping improvements to be completed the spring/summer season of 1995. Note storage module has now been relocated to Stall 37. The second issue is parking. In the approval of Application #1947 that dealt with the relocation of the storage module on the propeny, the City approved a parking variance with the total stalls being now reduced to 41. As already noted above in the factual findings, the total number of required stalls would be 54. The parking requirements are based on the nu^mber ot stalls determined to be needed for a retail operation and on the total number ot slips offered tor rental use (76). Pane 3 of applicant ’s addendum. Exhibit B. notes as follows; "Keep in mind all parking spots are open with none used for service shop needs, retail inventory, used inventory, etc. as --tt^e-nature of our Hn>;int‘ss has been changed to facilitate this (meaning bo at club/private customer use)." The license applxation. Exhibit E, notes on Page 3 their retail sales/service customer use exists requiring 8 spaces. Applicant should clarify if private boat club members or rental slip customers only use the marine accessory' retail operation and not the general public, this may be an issue for consideration. Eight spaces may not be needed based on the new "private club format of marina operation. Zoning File #2005 April 10, 1995 Page 3 of 3 This marina has always operated #1874 a.id 1947) dealing *service the number of rental slips.applicant was required to obtain a formal with the installation of the storage modu^.Center, allowing for overHow ^Vp-idU his current parking use plan at :he Center"with his 1995 license, review E.xhibii G. Issues for Considerntion 1 1 «»rmir for a boat club at a ma.ximum 60 member Does the current conditional pem ^as operated for me level or is the application ^member level The Cit\' can report no problems S.S »S'--™ license application. DO members fmd Ore parking "«f alwresrihlrlpKia^p^to needs of a boat club. As for staff, they found Mr. DeSantis analysis very helpful based on his years of e.spcnence. DOCS the fact that the marina has additional P-king avaibble on .eekends at the M^nJietonka Art Center have any impact on your conside.anons. Other issues raised by Planning Commission concerning parking needs for boat club use. WTiat conditions should be placed on ‘k**^oI the following: for a boat club use? Planning Commission members may consider amended CUP. Should curfew hours be placed on boat hive to be available at final check-m time? Tlie manna closes ai f su^r Shoid the City be involved in esublishmg curfews? Parking attendant on duty on weekends when mannas ate at their busies facilitate au.xiliary parking at An Center. 4. Should a specific number of stalls be designated on site for boat club users onl. 5.Others recommended by Planning Commission. W !' . CITY OF OROxNO - GENERAL LAND US U ■] i: ^i-j 'ON^^4^ fi PROPERTY LOCATION ...v / . ^>c. , Site Address Shorcl>i^ J><L^OllC /\U4AIW&5 ^P* y ' y < my, M„ Type of Application to be Filed CcT/ftM^ni/L!.4^ Property Idcndflcation Number (P.I.D.) Phone (home) 6>iz~ y76-^-T^^Phone (home) Cpi7.~ Name .C/V jLoii.<; (l^r (work)_ti|^-^£i ----- KMr^f^^:^Jry}iX7n.C.Cit) .Zil^XiV------- A \-f C,Cr^^JhAL. /3.-h^^^ ^ O'VNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home)f/_7 _6 - d> i~o &----- c ^ /y. y/ hg _ Phone i^’oxk )T ■ ^.^9 J- Address ^ ^Ta^t! ^C\\y La c Al<e.y:\y> S ^•t/h 11/^9 3 h(_________(monih/year) adjai^nt p^cels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory' Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credil/Bldg y $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use * $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the -Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (-h consultant fees) ^$250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Oth er - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROI^RTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /^/It^J/lResidential _Other (specify) w ^ V * - J w w' ^ 4.J VV-'-'w I te* *-■ ^ J* W* i w W* V t« w i '' •.'w* 2. 3. 4. 5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1.Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. .... ------Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obuin this lisl from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govemmem Cenier, 348-3271). ------Certificate of Sutsey (signed by a licensed surseyor) - refer to handout for survey information. . . Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ..... ____Topographic survey (e.tisting and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). . . • List of the lecal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest m the ------ property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please anach a separate list ol any other persons you wish notified of this application. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE I^CI^ffiN^ flR TO^ FOR REPRODUCTION (11" 17" OR SMALLER) TOCU. 1 . SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: -----------------_Date.--------------- ^e**appl^^ Lre^^^ag^^ pr^ide /ll information required or requested by the Zoning ^dm^hslS acrees mL add>nal fees (sta/f time not covered by original fee payment) Md/or unusual e^pensfl^curred f Kvik' of thjiappHcation. and cenifies that the information supplied is true and cirtcct to th| best^ his/^^^owledge. ^ JlJfMlpi DateApplicant’s signam^ev^-------- The^i^tr^erl^y ^^ovv lidges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable enirv onto the propertv- by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date ADDlicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the PTannmg Comnussion fleeting. Pi^ng CoLiission Meetmes are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present a ^hedulcd review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled please make anangemenis to have an authonzed agent attend m your place and advise the Building & Zoning Of ic of ibis change prior lo ihe meeting. I %y {- March 21,1995 Subject: Orono City Variance RE; 1995 & Future Sailors World Boat Club Attention Planning Commission: Page 1 j ^1 ^ fr /.i •\ -4 Please review the foUowing information pertinent to the requirement you have imposed making it necessary for a conditional use permit for a Boat Lease or Rental Club. I appreciate your willingness to \vork with the local Marinas and I will be working at continuing to offer the finest all new Marina in all of Orono. After meeting with iVUke Gaffron Febniary 27, 1995 he suggested I describe to you our Boat Club parking needs and general Boat Club use. Before I begin I want to e.xpress my disappointment in the Cities revision to make Boat Clubs a conditional use as this goes against the logic of over 40 years of Boat Rentals at this business site This should be an allowable use based on presenting adequate parking and 1 teel very uncomfortable putting the future of my business & family in the the hands of City Governments Conditional Use !! I believe most of the problem is you don't fully understand the Boat Club concept and when 1 provide now written and later oral explanation you will better understand why my above comments are justified. However, I respect Michael Gaffrons opinion that when 1 demonstrate to the City Planners the facts about the Boat Club that I will not have to be womed that every year my business could be subject to extinction !! 1 look forward to working with you and don’t want to give you the impression that 1 will be unreasonable or don’t want to cooperate with the City and its residents On the contrary 1 live m Orono, employ some of its children and love the community & people and w ill do everything I can to continue to improve my business to meet the standards that make it an asset to the community. With all the new improvements on this site to make it affordable for me and my family my future income sources rely heavily on the Boat Club Lease or Rental concept. ^0 Page 2 To begin with & "Boat Club" is nothing more than a fancy term tor Seasonal Boat Rental or Lease. The primary difference being that it would be a seasonal rental or lease on the equipment rather than daily rental. As a result the standard of boat operator is one who is better trained within in the frame work of the club and a safer more responsible user. We have US Coast Guard Auxiliary Instructors teach our members in conjunction with the Hennepin County Water Patrol rules ot the road format. The Boat Club member is typically a local or neighboring resident who does not live right on tlie Lake but would like to have the privilege of boating without having to ow n a boat. Because he is a seasonal user and very often a member of this very conununity the respect for the Boat, Lake & Community is and has been the last three years a proven reality. Rather th^n having a 40 to 50 boat single day rental fleet of fishing boats or pontoons w ith random users we have a total of 10 to 12 runabouts, pontoons and sailboats We do this to get a seasonal rental commitment out of a controlled number of people each year As a result we are not trying to attain needed income and provide parking from a fleet of 40 or 50 small boat users that come and go alternately morning, afternoon & evenings so you turn this fleet of 40 or 50 two or three times a day with parking requirements that get excessive and uncontrollable to say the least. Normal Boat Club users go out for the day and return in the evening so parking is easy to control. The controlled parking situation the Boat Club offers is on of the main reasons we have gone to this type of Lease Rental If you have 12 boats your dealing for parking and Marina parking requirements for only that fleet of 12 not 40 or 50. We will not allow our Boat Club members to come with excess cars and can control this How could you control people from bringing excess cars if you have a 40 to 50 boat fleet of daily rentals coming & going from 5:00 in the morning until 10 00 at night ? As I said This is one of the main reasons why w e do the Boat Club concept so we can handle the parking requirements far easier making the concept fit my needs and the Cities requirements. We also control the grow th of the Boat Club concept by capping membership each year so w e know exactly what we are dealing with in terms of members and our ability to manage it. We currently have approx 50 members & will cap this year at approx. 60. Our facility appears to be able to handle around 100 members or more as we balance the traffic and use by simply leaving a certain number of slips open by not renting them to the annual slip renters. The great thing about the Boat Club is w e can make up lost income in slip rentals and control the right balance of rented slips. Boat Club slips and open slips to accommodate needed income, parking and facility use. ^ Page 3 You uill sec later how the combination of Boat Club Slips & Rental Slips add up in terms of needed parking Our Club offers weekday only and lull week boating. We are encouraging weekday memberships which spread out parking requirements more during the less bus> weekdays when it is never a problem. To understand the Boat Club usage you must realize we work with a certain number of boats to members ratio. We currently operate with a 7; 1 ratio or 7 members to every one Boat. As 1 mentioned earlier because the Boat Club is in such demand we can impose parking restrictions limiting members to use of one car etc. and really exercise control over the parking that you could not in a large 40 to 50 Daily Rental Boat Fleet. The other nice thing about the Boat Club is we can adjust ratios upward so we need less slips and parking per member & offer boating at other locations to make up the difference so its fair to them ( Exaggerated example it you had 20 members & one boat you assume parking for one boat & one slip and Boat Club members only need parking when they are using the boat & when its out only one member uses parking at a time so its one for one with slip renters its one boat one renter one slip one parking spot with the club its one slip one boat one parking spot & 7 members or whatever ratio that you adjust so you can partially control your parking requirements.) 1 believe I have developed a good understanding of the parking needs at this business site since my involvement here since 1973 when it was then called Paul's Landing with between 40 & 50 single rental units consisting of fishing boats & pontoons. Please review the following estimations and facts relating to the yearly parking needs of Sailors World Boat Club, Dock Slip Renters, On & Off Season Retail. In our Boat Club our seasonal contract use dates arc May 15 - Oct. 15. I will only address Weekend parking situations considering a prime season from June 1 - Sept. 4 and off season May 1 - May 3 1 & Sept. 5 - Oct. 15.Keep in mind all parking spots are open with none used for semce shop needs, retail inventory, used inventory etc as the nature of our business has been changed to facilitate this. Adjustments are needed to accurately portray parking needs in regards to: 1)Allocation of total prime season verses Pre- or Post season week end days. (And Holidays) In three years doing the Club early season boating in May & late season boating in Sept. & Oct. has been about 50% less use on weekends compared to prime season June-August (Reason being kids still in school and weather less desirable) . 2)A bad weather Vo deducted in both prime & non prime season week end days It seems that a close estimate would be 25Vo of entire season weekends either rain out, or too cold or windy. Pace 4 To illustrate the real issue where parking requirements are a valid concern we must breakdo\N-n the up conung season as follows: Total 1995 week end days where parking is an issue of concern Pre- Prime se ............6 daysMay 13................................................................................................... Sept. 2 - Oct. 15 Post Seasoa 14 days Total 1995 week end prime days & I lolidays where parking is an issue of concern .........24 davs June 3 - August 27...................................................................................' May 29 (Monday) Memorial day.......................................................................... ^ July 3,4 (Monday -Tuesday) 4th of July................................................................ ^ Sept. 4 (Monday) Labor Day................................................................................ Total Weekend & Holidays where parking is a concern................. Bad weather factor approximately 25 % deduction............. Approximate seasonal average Week End & Holidays where parking is an issue.. out of365 days annually. 48 days -12 davs . 36 days Parking requirements for Boat Club & Dock Slip Renters are determined in regards to us^ slips at Sailors World. Our dock plan indicates a total of 79 slips that we have to deal in regards to parking. For the record only 75 slips are usable for either Slip Renters or Boat Club, Of the other 4 slips off the Sea Wall 2 of these slips are only 12 feet long and 2 are located outside with only two tie up points and are used primarily for servicing break down towed in traffic, limited Slip Rental and Boat Club service or our work boat tie up.i . The following table approximates Slip Renters & Boat Cub parking needs based on 1995 Boating season consisting of Prime Season Week End & Holidays with % deduction adjustments tor bad weather & pre- & post prime season use. We find that approx. 25% ot the total Summer Boat Club use is lost on weekends due to bad weather We also find approx 50% less uses occur in the Boat Club earlier in May & later in Sept. & Oct Prime Season when the kids are out of school & the weather warms up is from approx. June 10 - Sept. 4 when weekend use is around 100%. (Please read comments on Page 6 .before you review table to better understand). f: "Page 5 *BOAT CLUB & SLIP RENTERS PARKING TABLE fPS, '• PABKiyCSPOTS ES “ E4/U.ySE4SO.\ LS-LATESHiSOS RAD HEATHER H E - HEEKESDf. t*SltmSUPSRE\TERS B.C’BOAT CLUEt Currently @ 60 members 80 members 100 members ( 7; I ratios or 9 boats & slips)(11 boats & slips)(14 boats & slips) 11 X 1.50= 16 50 16.50 P.S. x .50%E.S. =8 25 P.S. X .25 B W. = approx 6.25 P S AV E. May 15-31 9 x 1.50 for .50®/o of members (with 50 % ded. driving 2 cars =13.50 P.S. E.S. use). 13.50 x .50 for E S.= 6 75 P.S 6.75 X .25% bad weather ded. = approx 4 P S needed/weekend June 1 - Sept. 4 9 x 1.50 for 50% of members 11 X 1.50= 16.50 driving 2 cars = 13.50 P.S.16.50 P.S. X 25% B.W 13.50 X .251'o bad weather ded. = 12 - 13 P S.AV E = 10 - 11 P.S. needed/weekend 1 ix 1.50=21 21 P.S. X .50% E.S =10 50 P S X 25 = approx 10 P S 14 X 1 50=21 21 P S x 25 B.W = 16 P S AV E. Sept 5. - Oct. 15 9 X 1.50 for .50% of members driving 2 cars = 13.50 P.S approx. 6 25 P S /W E, 13.50 X .50 L.S. =6.75 P.S 6 75 X 25% B W = 4 P S AV E. approx lOP.S.AV’.E. May 15-31 66 S R x 20= 13 2 PS AVE. 64 S R x 20= 12 8 P S AV E 61 S.R. x .20 (slip rentals W.E. (ADD 10 for Boat Club & Slip = 12.2 P.S.AV.E. use last 2 yrs. avg. Renters Memorial Weekend only) approx. 20 % E.S. & 30% prime season). June 1-Sept. 4 66 S R x 30= 20 PS AVE.64 SR x 30= 19 P S AV' E 61 S.R. x.30 (ADD 15 for Boat Club & S.R.=-18 3 P S.AV.E. 4th of July Week end) Sept. 5 -Oct. 15 66 SRx 20= 13 2 PS/WE.64 S R x 20=12 8 PS/WE 61 SR.x .20 = 12 2 P S AV E. HIGHEST 31 P.S. for B.C & S.R. TOTAIS OSL Y 41 .Memorial Wkiid. 46 July 4th Wknd. 32 P.S. for B.C. & S.R. 34 P.S. for B.C- S.R 42 Memorial Wknd. 46 July 4th Wknd. 47 July 4lh Wknd. 49 July 4th Wknd. A Page 6 We bsuc SW parking passes to be displayed on dash board of car at all times to determine and control Slip Renter & Boat Club Member parking so we get them to come in one car most ot the time. For the sake of argument we will increase the Boat Club member parking by 50® o OR 1.5 PARKING STALLS NEEDED FOR EACH This is a very liberal figure to demonstrate that although wc can control the parking what would HAPPEN IF VVE INCREASED THE NEED DRAMATICALLY. Even though it doesn’t happen we will use an example where on a given day one out of every two Boat Club Members wall come in two cars. In summation after 20 years on & off this business site I would like to express 1 feel we have found our niche and best mixture of Marina use for this property to best be able to meet all City requirements. As I have stated in our previous Marina meetings I believe the city should view each Marina as a unique business with unique requirements. Parking , Landscaping, Lake access & Seix'ices all vary in each location and each should be treated and can be on an individual basis to meet City requirements. 1 would appreciate your present & fiiture recommendations for approval of this variance as Boat Club income is such a vital need to assure our future ability to offer a Marina that all of Orono can be proud Sinc! r/Jm •Galy De^antis Sailors World, Inc. ■M OATI o^vn ICMCPIN CaWITY PROPCPTf nirORHATlOll SYSUMPROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT Pl^JBAOlPACE7.%. •.•ATCM OOt*St lO-117-n AE ooos^ • ■ MOP ABM tint SHORELINE OR<9 (Mm NAM R C SmmA spa SnERNATAMPAVIR ' ROBERT C I PATRICIA STIERNA'•« •>NANE/AOM MnO SHORELINE M NAYZATA m . 55Sn , . •' /v * ‘ • .. •*.. .*.■y *• ■*;v.. . r .*4 , I .v:i. .Vi* •c ./! . .. I 7.*SB 10*n7-2S AE OOIA S;...PR0P AOOR • 019S5 SMMELXNE DR OMCR NAHE . SAILORS NORLD ' *”** HARINA A YACHT CLUB INC ^■XP55 SHORELINE OR :7 '.V- ‘'•’.'V.v •V : 0 \i4 .• ‘ B # • •, ^ w**<.• :•'• ;•••■ • i . * ... 1 vV‘. •• • •••••■•■_•_._ NAYZATA HN SSSYl • 3 *. i » 1 SO 10-117-23 AE 0022 , mww.^ -OITAO SHORELINE OR .OHNER NAME SMITH'S BAY MARINA INC ;TAXPAYER SMITH'S BAY HARINA INC •-•‘PROP AODR NAME/AOOR •X170B NAYZATA BLVO :•:* ^/ HINNETONKA MN 555A5 i . . . • ‘ ‘* ’* * •• ^ '• »' ; T. ' ' ‘.Vr •.* •. V *.* • .* • *. i ' »' v;.-.v • T.r. ';V.-'. T‘- ;»■ ( • -::. V •: ?>. ! ’.** .*••, .. * • * . •' •» . ' ‘f .. ; V* .. • ’ • ! • ‘ *•'*•** •«/•.•.•*': .j.r, si.i' v.*,'.'',. •V , • 4 • .1 *i.%• ■■‘i;•..*.. f. *I . , *..7 .. *<'• ,•• •• •. • • I (I .A *m %y ‘ * % V* *• • f' Vv ' *• I* '‘ . •• • ' ,. ' * ! .••**» •' * I’- V *• »*■*..«*.■"*- • V* •' ' ^l* ................. J ■> *4 SB 10-117-ES AE 0007019A0 SHORELINE ORA R NETTLES I A T IttllLESALAN NETTLES I M«« NETTLES19A0 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 553Y1 SB 10-117-2S A2 001201950 SHORELIfiE ORC 4 M L CASTELLONCAHILO 4 MARIA L CASTELLON ;1950 SHORELINE ORNAYZATA m 55391 *•»A . J % - SB 10-117-23 A2 C015 00038 ADDRESS VJNASSIGNEO J V SPATES ETAL MTKA MARINA 4 YACHT CLl» INC 1955 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA 55391 i 38 10-117-.^.. AE 0021 01980 SPATES AVE 0 CREAR 4 H B CREAR DANIEL CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH OOZ 00007 c O 01 I CERTirY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE •' .euH,, , *»• . . • » ■•'• v"' DATE i by *•-. *•. . •I ••; •*. tL »••.V ;/ ^ •. • • V V . ♦ . r •;. /••• •. • • . • • «•.* 4 I •w* I • I .•r- ?• o B B *•B ••, t' - . n •1i" •■ o ••. V ;• ■r ^ ••• # I ‘ •‘ .f. •f*. ‘ •n \ • • • O n r ••.s i *•* rftrt'fifSi v^/ \: > » • *• . •• ..• wrr... 4 iv.• *•: \ (3) A); >•(19) \^‘ ^ i *. •_- .:•>• r**/ • V ... -- • .-. «.■:* .•*•4 .'•% I L HO *>• \ T y^y u1.' •#*. . *r r •••'?.'• : I ' M (^9) . ..'‘.rv 8!^^ A/ >‘>.V.M) or lor 3 (7) 4p: X64) !4\ X /V ( I / I! / ^ '• ' ■' '■•7' / A Tflt.TTA?»C§rU A'•’Z I / 'A ■• 4 1.,^ O' * 'Ola\* vOp VsV CCI»?€T^ C^ viCAffO —^ /y -— —/ / ( 10) :e c:p*.fa > viar£- 43 -3 >. % .•-a;^ •^nn 1 7/Z J CITY OF ORONO ^License Year P O. Box 66, Crjstal Bay, >Unnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina - Date application returned to City u •wf w«*W t T ■ t -s-•c«» unlawful for any persons to engage or parac.pate m busin.ss u ................... . a license therefor front the City. •b a "t^ach .Ss"an ^« FEBRUARY 28 OF THE LICENSE \E.\R m-.sr>T-,ss CsTPRMrfflQN Q .D 2^1 ^ • 1.business or trade name ---------------9 / 19ST ClnotielrM£ I>eiy£ ^ ^IM^SS23 MaUinr Acaress K O ■---------f------------------------I 7^/n MarinaFi.one6ii::l2C.lZWi-------Office Phone OWx t hcH r-OPERATON ^ ^^ DcS’/lAjTrJ . P.Own Address O O__-------------------------------------------- 2. 3. Phone G \ I - H V & ^^------—------------------------------- business ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) individual ownership _____ partnership _corporation List the name of each partner or corporate omcer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: (2tAc9 or-I <;^tvTrS_ List the minimum number of employees on duty -.vhen the m.arina is open to Ute public during boating season. 6 dock attendants __L repair or sert ice personnel others available for sales/public infonnation, etc. Paee 1 of 5 List every short or long rerro business occupant of Ute property other than 0,e Business noted above: jf\ 4. 5. PRINCIP.^all Principal Uses in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ w ^ ____ services offered): ,4ccessorv Uses head pumpout marine accessories boat repair and servicing V on-land boat storage 'winter summer marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle rnnditionnl Uses (ConditjonaiJisS Pprmit is Reauiredl fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) X lessons/ter.^g ^ boat rentalV sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales ■7 X boat club 7^ public boat launching, on-deraand public boar launching, transient ' charter boat caretaker ^iwelling_unit cross-country ski sale/reutal business schedule (Check appropriate items): \/open during boating season only open all year ------ JCll UUilXl^ WWW** ^ ii^proposed hours of operation: d^ock access ,0 ^ ^ & service marina SECURITY is provided by: CARETAKER living on site? -------^--------- J_ AM to £ PM LSi and site plan submitted with this application. 7.boats stored in THE WATER (for lake use) a.At dock slips Total Boats in Water Comp^iny Owned clwU Rental' Boats Rental Slips/ Spaces Other Total Boats 1 \0 (rl^-A JA-4-lO LlLl. Pace 2 of 5 8.BOATS STORED ON FOR L.\KE USE Inside Buildings ------- Outside on Racks —— Outside - other means —^ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use — a. b. c. 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) 19 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) Transient boats (repair/service) New boats for sale (inventory) Used boats for sale (inventory) Other (list:_________________—^ Total InsideBuilding Outside Building a. b. c. d. A/ifl-7 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES O^INTER) Transient boats (repair/service) Contract storage (customer’s boats) Inventory (new & used boats) Other (list: ____________________^ Total Inside Building Total Outside Building a. b. c. d..35 Total off-street parking RFOIJTREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING '■(“r;, Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x___(line y)l - Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Chaner boat pon-of-call .f.) = ^ b. spaces 3 yspaces c.spaces d. _ spaces e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross chaner boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] =’TTT.r.accs Total spaces required (add a. b, c, & d)cnaces Total spaces available per attached parking plan ^ 13 WINTER P.ARKING REQUIRED 0.20 X (line 12e) ^spaces a. Paee 3 of 5 POCK constructiq >[ 14.CH5CK ALL THAT APPLY: Pennanem _____ Seasonal Concrete __ Metal Fcam PUK^s: __X Decking: X Wood Wood De-icing normally used ■^tal _____ Other_____ Other _______________ Barrels Other Flotation Method (if used): ____ |f.tCF.N\SE STANDARDS AmTSORY of mre': Zo^n'Scf uTriL^e standards: A.R^ouired. Each business shall provide certification of liabUity insurance coverage tor the duration of the license peno . T •u The nrimarv' business operator on the property shall be the and ^LTn^ be " toei^d bm"shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. c.nr.„,i.n S..andards, Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum ir"“p"artov“acuities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or ^parking congestion, eliminate Ulegal on-street parking, and avoid pedesm traffic through neighboring property'. 2)Boat engine testing and charging shaU be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3)Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. e.xcept as necessary to accommodate normal fishmg activity or private us premises stored boats. 4)The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5)On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6)Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, matenals be limited to those locations shown on an approved site application, plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annua Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally varia e 7)Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 such use conducted in said dismct shall not be requireo ■,to the above business use license standards shall be cause license pevocattoiL “ntfp of this chapter, for license suspension or revocation p P ATTACFTViENTS, The following PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the manna property and the autnon ^ parking areas, access areas, docks, slips, buoys, launc m • ® ^ jj ^ updated each year to show areas, fencing and and L c'unges proposed for Slet'ariL 0. ;l:: iu "ent‘ appi.cauon.The drawing shall also indi :ate the locat.ons o, winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LI.ABIUTY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. 4. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLIC.ATION.V-.Opy Ol VUUl —-------- COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLIC.VTION FEE according to dte current City fee schedule.nn S Initial Application @ s' ^ OVTW Renewal Application @ $200.00 - Late Fee (if not posunarked by February 28) $100.00 j total due this APPUCATION pfvtf W procedure •I .h.. Tin' Council will review the license application and the v..vo.Ma MAY OPEN P'n^' 'O ONI Y UPON APPROVALOFTIjmCE^ RV THE CITY COUNCIL^ Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code the to pertbrm safety and cod^ynplian^ insp^tto^) 7_ 9 ^ Audtorized^mre ---------— Title f /l^/O!/^!/L Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 illHl'* •'r-i-?.,.f» tied' ■V 1 '* J. id :r f 1*1 t- ) I • • Xiii *f »f - I'IA . ^ r K r 7i iV/*J -• 44 • *•V<Ki\l[ ».r» i\Ft>■ i yj u '■u pH0/‘09£H PECK I* '* t »I r :/i?/^/V-!?:io‘ [♦> 'Mifj'l'c.f -f'i #<•c.io* •'J0/r r J ♦ I l-il'ii'.l @ / LlVl ri. Vr.U bccK r^i /\/'^ n V / I :!■ I.'.!!'. ^yirr: PROPOSE p. »V4JKt''^039 LI'’.', y^'ti •3 ti ^ / '3 5’ MM >i» u\ \ 'h ^ *•^ r ^•.'b•^’1 J, a { rut rosi’P i,|'.< vA- r/\»K/.|iQ — ^ ■' 1' % -lx* t nV SPACl :eu /] V" *‘/«/4yV»» / r lyiii^t iv.«fitv«ti| y / y t y ,ex:i3r:?5r:v:isr:% “v.vjc^v l.t;ca Wall IV / V.‘‘* «lAfO»M«I.C Mlt/iJtn ME1AL imU'iGItMttf) / ^fjcj lyj/i .Lzxz rx zrk r - rr a ^ r - lYouJ lVtjlki\7Ul K-. VI:*//r -0 V» Jbl f\ a! «\ *li IVulkt\:iij •v-llUW/- ;.r;r' !'j.!• 'j*: ;i^./ ,,lior b\J 'M’l*' //>, ,V'>VV3^' '9- •„<«?■?•■' \ @ V vA»'’i ii »>' ■ o.vi rs i- i*r'^'. • • ••,V (V^ \^ *• '• *! fc'f/^ V •I ^•'VdX\u'o, .,•;# llii*^ .fC'111' r'y.ihe Csuvu. fhi^i4crtyvlci<^ ] <?crC€»4reiL’i+o«?5r*' fi\A%Vct. jruDXO •Irv^ffK/+<. sr.^ -------------^(C /7 [/ I H/ w I p/*fl.(^' ^ L -f"'tt^ M*’' 'I? <>''^i>^: I k' $-72. f—/—hh w l^pPf>L>A/ ^ b. ^O f—f r 5 f—/----f—f—f----/ -/- / ,-----f-/ / / f f- /i-ryp.P. Dx«<tTio-v^ : K!5^<-c.’^‘^-(xJoiJi-j); ,r> Be-i^tt- ST. T^fn teff ifi-^l. fl ■f’h-K, A 2-fVvr'fc i&i.ciclc5‘^ 5‘^^Y £67^^^ SAi>-l-fk ^vtsh So <f0 ,<v( M'. Ur_r tOocLCi /Tt£#i D^.Vk, ^ tif C/\ OAc^*X4^# »* rt, hr ifo\ O' ii CITY of ORONO BESOLLTION OF THE CITT COLTiCIL NO 3 4 7??_____ A RESOLUTION GR.\NTLNG VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION lo'^TJDmSION 2, SECTION 10.41, SUBDPVTSION 5 (A) ^.FCTmv 9 (B), SECTION 10.41, SUUDIMSION 10 (D), Ie CT ON lo ‘^^ SL^omSION 16 (L) AND SECTION 10.41. SLTIDIVISION 2SECTION^1^.6.^SJ.M ^^,^^^>,^1ENT OF CTOLMERCLAL SITE PLAN FOR SAILORS WORLD, INC. FILE .4<1947 TVHEREAS, Gan' DeSantis of Sailors World Marina and Yacht Club. Inc_. a follows: E.^ibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, on September 13. 1993 the City council approved Resolution #3371 that granted variances to allow the installation of an 8'x20’ accessory storage module to be located within parking stall 34; and WHEREAS, the applicant has filed an amended variance application that w'ould seek to relocate the storage module within another acceptable parking stall located out of the akes“ore pro “c.ed area ^at would requue approval of the following variances to Mumctpal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 2. Section 10.5o. Subdivision 16 (L) ; Subdivision 10 (D) to pemu. a change in the nature of ex stmg h^''dc°v'r m “ which contains 5 100 s.f. or 83.6% hardcover as approved m Resolution No. ,.891 of COTDCil. where only 1.525 s.f. or 25?. hardcover would normally the to Section 10 41. Subdivision 5 (A) to allow a further reduction of one parking stall from 42 suTapprovek in Resolution No. 2891 which granted a variance to die 48 this site and for a variance to Section 10.41. Subdivision 9 (B) to allow a 10 .J. . setback for a storage structure where a 50’ street setback would normally be required ( § .-1874 proposed 28’ setback); and per Section 10.41. Subdivision 2 seeks approval of an amended commercial site plan to allow the installation of said storage module. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota; Page 1 of 9 if >’ V CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cm* COLTSCIL KO. 3478_____ 1- n *e>» 3. 4. FINDLNGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1947. The Orono City Council granted variances and approved an amended co^ercial site plan for the applicant (Zonir s Application #18/4) per Resolution on December 13 1993. Pursuant to that resolution, the storage module has be temporarily placed within stall 34 but applicant has received complaints from pro^rty owner to the west noting visual impact upon lake views. The aoDlicant has filed the current application in order to seek approval of an amend^ed variance application with the purpose of relocating the storage module in another parking stall that would lessen the visual impact upon the lake view of the property owner to the west. At the Council meeting of August 22. 199*1 Council approved the use of either stalls 37 or 38 because of their alignment behind the principal struemre on the property. Council ’s recommendation was based on the following findings. A.Placement of the structure within either stalls 37 or 38 will nimmize impact upon lake views of residence to the immediate west. B.Structure will be located out of the lakeshore setback area. C.Relocation to either stall 37 or 38 will not result in the loss of additional stalls. D.Less visual impact upon users of adjacent County Road as only 8’ side would be exposed to roadway. E.There will be no sighting problems at intersection. 5 Noted in the earlier review for Application #1874, in order to compensate for^^^e loss of the single parking stall which reduces the number of ^^^t 42 were approved, the applicant has provided a letter from tne Center located approximately 1/4 miles west of the marina for overflow parking use. Page 2 of 9 VXrt 5 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. ^ ^_______ 7. 8. 9. Orono and the DNR. -me location of the storage module at lO’ from the County Road 15 where a 50' setback is normally required, is a location that is from said roadwav and therefore visual screetung of the module by use of evergreen t>pe vegetation is imperative to reduce the negative visual impacts. Based on the intent of Municipal Code Section 10.41. Subdivision 7 (B) tequir^ landscape areas shall not be used for the storage of boats, equipment, or material's. The proposed storage module will provide storage such that none of the landscape areas per the approved site plan for this facUity need not be encuinbered with storage of any kind. The Citv Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Comro-ssion, reports by City staff, by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 10 The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are pecuhar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that erantine the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not rnerely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to a leviate a demonstrable hardship or difficult)’; is necessary to preserve a substamual right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spint and intent ot tne Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER ANT) CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City hereby grants the variances as set forth above and approves tlie proposed . LsolutiL /^3371 that approved Lhe placement of an 8’x8’x20’ storage module stall 34 and now grants a variance that would allow the relocation of said storage mo either stalls 37 or 38, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 9 f: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8478______ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. if the storage module becomes a nui'iance. The storage module shall be free standing and shall have no foundation in order to preserv'C its mobility. m “pfantings of a size LT^pacing to pr^nde at rwestMnd'lrn'frSr' sfdJ. Screening shall not be allowed to interfere with required sighting distance for vehicles entering and exiting the propeil). indicated on the site plan. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, sha ^-nor re“aS- authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a mtsdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the tenns I? this amen'ded resolution and on behalf of himself, his assiens. hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution m the Cha the property. Page 4 of 9 [ Cu « CITY of ORONO RESOLLTIOiN OF THE Cm' COUNCIL NO. 8478 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the lOth day of October, 1994. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoins insimment was acknowledged before me October 1994 by Edward J C tanan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and tty er Cit^^ Orono, a Minnesot ..lunicipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. LISDA S. VEE KOTAPY PU oUC - MINNESOTA ^^3 ''’ hemn^pTn count/ . ^ My co'Tifr i5S!cn expires d-12-96 NoDrv Public Page 5 of 9 CITY of ORONO am.RESOLUTIOiN OF THE Cm’ COUNCIL NO. 3 4 7-8-------- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) >ss COUNTY OF HENNEPLN > 199 before me a Notary On this _______day Public within and for said county, personally appware (-------------- act and deed. IISDA S. VT”__ s NCTAPY PUBLIC • MlNNc:>s-»TA -U }NOT.AJRY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPLN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public v-ithin and for sa.d county,dercrtbcd in and who c.x=^ the foregoing instrument act and deed. 7alidTcknowledged that he (they) executed the same ai his (their) free NOTARY PUBLIC Pa2e 6 of 9 1 'ac»^‘ i 3i \ 1 /' i^ < H1>, j < -X ^ .1 1 1 i ordinance no . ^SECOND SERIES 9 the city COCTICIL ff ORONO ORDMNS AS FOLLOWS: SHCnON I. M..c,.Zc=..Co.S.-ion lOAI.I I. arc .«r=by <lclc«d. ^^ SECTION 2. A ne'.v Secca 10.41, :> to rwd as follows.as loiiowa. SEC. 10.41. B-2 LAKESHOE BUSINESS DISTRICT. •_________; c- S.O.T. ,0 provide areas where limited many of the operators of the l^eshore rpcreatlonal purposes on ' ^^emtion from the shorelands 21 sHaSEC rfe commercial activities, while protect^ enviroiimeni. Subd. 2. Definiiions. A. accessory or condiuonal uses ^ 4 • ywss" means engaaina in one or more of the permitted, 2 Litesho-re Business Distnet. T A 1 Lonai — ' . ........................... la WLU^ii ij --------. , ^ •u- rv.o Lakeshorc Snbd, 3. License ReqdmL Each the Orono Business District shall obuin an annuimarma busmess license per th Municipal Code. subd. 4. .Application. n™ f ^pecia^'Sointed- Uhe Use Comm.nee for review. or sirucrurc shall be use t- fcnBl of in-waier boat slips. Sa!. of tea.. mo.cr..«.U«s and marine accesso™. c.Icrair and servicing of beats. f Knars winter and summer.D.Oadacd storage of boats, vtra E.Marine fuel sales. p 3ai£ and fishing tackle sales. „Withitt any -B-2- lokeshore Businos District, the Subd. 6. .ssoty uses: following uses shall be pomtied acc-ssoty A.Sgua. Signs as regulated in this chapter. B, tot head pumpout/ sanitary boat waste dumping tadity. .1 ^th#*asscnblv'" license c.Fuhing requirements dSecdon 6.03. „r c,.etion 52i and/or the special esem i-requirements of Sec ^ machinesmeats of Section x-a , . from vei*i<' machines. O.sale of pre-paclcaged p^^merariooation other allowed. E.Dive shops. F, Clubhouse (assembly/lounge/kitchenette area for useJy slip .enta ■boat club' customers oif). G.Ussons/teaching (sailing schools, etc.). H.ffennl of boats I.Sailboard sales/rental. j.be boating sales/rental'setvice and operations base. .ir^^tbjrrr K.Ice fisnin? tackle sales. ^nrove sucn use u ............c '”P‘oy«a place appropnare ™^priate to protect publ.c . ...p■E Ooe caretaker dtveUiog unit, subiect ,0 coaiMons and .itnttatto .cbusethatnaybe bnporedbytbeatyCcunctl. Subd. 8. Parking Requirements.^ or parking - telS- ;Xs re"u~ ^baU be as foUo. this chapter, tnc ' . _i:„c- wa . .. . _t or on land. aimum parNuus ----- A.SIX parking spaces shall be provided for »dr ran boat slips on wa V o mess pl^s one additional space for B.At least eisM waiihousing. and all outside sales eaci ECO square feet °f f-^Ltd service'functioa aud storage areas related to tte sales a.d m % J related to tte sates ,.r, Irdudete launching of boats owned by the C.If 1^'Boat LaEctinc. Transient), ten additional public for the day from tnil«s ran?. Lto-trailer par.tting spaces shall he projacsb iuai* r- D.If die P/epof'^‘I “tanerlUiS be^proSed or ajm additional parking ^^'“jr^jcTshad be provided tote City subject to Cou..v app for off-site parking an s..-.•_____„„r he seoarated by a public roadway E.The required pa^g from the deck, a storage srace, moonngce space, muuiui^ F Required off-street parking SM^n each year, the of .oods or for the storage «f^traS-om required off-street parkin, m y f^„o;ional parking itea. u mainuined “■»-or. .1'Ofo of the requircu o P.M ».»“ V “■■ .-.r^r^:t;fTn to the parking space; U.raiKiiis . , ,pove The^um^^r«^/S^:^"-^^^^^^^ 31 on me wiui sasw ■-num narking rteirements prove ro be inadequate for . '• !■;?''! ma"t“"d to orderm continue that use. , given use, add.r.onal park. . may .................iditionai paiK , ^ cHnil be C hd 9 Yr-ds The minimum require yard areas for the^^^^smCp^^ „d and p-t“i-:?rhot," , any requucu d in the ' rrired vard !r“s Jot th'^" accordance widl the followtug provstons: A.The minimum landscaping are. shaU be as follows: L . ... ,0C depth, but in no cut: sboll «"j, ^ aggregate width of 30 feet for «h landscaping area for access to marina operation. CM tedscecidJ eree shall be ar. aiea that is paralldto the side lot line and not within t^e lax.sace uaa shall not be less than 10 feet deep. _____-£S3H===Breaks in the landscaping area for ac.es tn t- of 50 feet for each mama operation. B.Thedetalled^Pl-^;" a natural woods area conuiMg P^^^^\“ht's'hall be interdispersed among the trees ^ in height. Shrubs not less than two „ot be less than 50% 0P^/1“= ^ to eventually provide, at maiunty.J^|p^^.ecl in the landscaping area except the t the summer months. No uses m addition to the ^ landscaping and access roads ^ P ^ reauiemenis of this district. The use o^ landscaping which has been P'““^^ „vidins natural landscaping and solid v^ fencing shall not satisfy tb.e meet the requirements of this diatnct^U screening. Any yard area j uces and shrubs. AU landscapmg shal be be planted with nursery stock. maintained in a healthy growing conly giuwLu^ ^— gHor to .e date of Su^e^f "J^^r^nrat^TrS Chapter, whichever date occurs firsu ^. .1.. hv bennng.chill he sufficientlv delineated by beming, D.AU landscne areas shaU sutticie ercroachment of vdxcle ^kSi: :irLr:^er foir:f^'rornrrrlals or equ.pmen. storage Intethe required landscape areas. E.All groundaver in ilie required landscaping the Ike. 10% of the required landscape areas. '•T3 '?'* T Subd 11 Additional Performance Standards. Within Business District any land use must «r the following performance stand • PU=F°“‘f““'“" “-,„ „.acs of access to te operation frcm any 3.Insofar as ?«=“*'%of vetudesiem the prccew over h lit-, VO locoEland designed as to avoid *. rw ,operation to any street shall te so residential areas,fejadjacent to the public sixeets thaipmnani,naved for a distance or at le >.-oceration to anv unpaved public road^ f„ed. unpaved public road«y ■ C.All lighting ijjre or from the roadiay. Ti^rrfor'Tnnllg -- strife:zoning Chapter. 01 8.00 A..°P'”3^°"o°Lpp“o«”°^''(noT?ou^S -“ ’»S“,=■“” * F.Ptrsons m '‘’“|'f^(jo “trash. rubbish, npair parts, machinery, premises m a neat aid orderly manner and free from rr P,uipment and ^^^leharge shall prohibit - s:,ts3« ^ firilities n providsd, the boats shall be stored I.If OB-Iand boat sto =.outside structures for purpose of in such mamier that they do " .^rOud'andii^ storage areas may not be located storaue of boats may cot exceed 15 f'« “ ^ pr-msashall at aU times be maintamed m a in the required yards or lacdscapmg areas. ns= P neat and orderly manner.ncr. Any gasolme offered ^r “^^oherrMumdptl'’code to create a danger to the cominumt>. K.On-Iand boat density. c- hmt densit\’ Tbe number of boats stored on the 1. Summer boat ^an be safely stored m premises for any and all reasons shall not and emergency access to the ^lowable locations while maintaining ^ accepfale parking spaces. Boats shall not sire, as wefl as maintaining the required nurnb ^^„<,nUis (June 1 thru Seprember 15). be stored in required auto parking spac-s durm, , TTif» number of boats stored on the t.xceed tha mimber which ““ '’Yh/s L as ln as maimining the required number of wmter egress anl emergency access to the sice, as w parking specs. c ^' wvafn®^S Ll'ee mon" “"fto :Sn ^s^Ue“"fcounc™ap;roval for any ftirurerevisions. _ * feet in hd^im Subd 12. Area, Height. Lor Width and lari Requirements. A.Height. NO srruemre or buili« ahall e.xceed 2-1/2 s.ories or thirty L.The following minimum tequiements shall be observed. 1.Lot Area - 2 acres. 2.Lot Width Parallel to bin - 200 feet. 3.Lot Width Perpendiculx to Lakeshore 4.Lakeshore Yard - 75 fer. 5.Side Yard -10 feet. 6.Front Yard Along Strea-30 feet. -200 feet, L Subd. 13. Setback. 2aidcov«^aiidTre^Remo^^^Municipal Zoning Cafe S “bor“ . . w,,;Mi‘na <;c»rhack fron.^.Lnkesbon Setback Rcuntlations. Tbe budding setback from « shoreline shall be 7o feet . D^u-iential No oceradon or activities e.xcept for stor^ B.Setback o boundary of an adjoining propert>' liie and parking may >== “tr«sid!SlSp'os:rwhicb property is used for resioenai t 1 , Cre-ts No operation or activities e.tcept for Stonge b conduc-ed dosf^ 50 feet to die nght-of-way of any existing street, tcid and parking may be conduccca c or highway. D. Lakeshon pJ^^^en^stl^cmrefwS there shall be no excavating, than 25% hardcover. Within 250 to 5)0 „ ISO i„: Oi a.Ik, nr. ».■*«“■ £i s,£X ‘“ •V T _ 0.11 c H.xree Kei^ „iOi the " ^:v “cf Muddpal zoning Ode Section 10.56.s of Municipal Z-oniHe Otalna^ NO land shall be that results in water runoff '^v tune a new use is applied for. wh^r iainase plans shall be ^“btmtted v*e apph p,^ stiaDbe throuah subdivision, variance, coi^o reviewed by the Qty s— to .ta “wrr"poa^l drainage. I r -■ „N0t^^ itMoading any o^he^pra^■ision of this Ss=.i:r»=^s“ •-^. -—“''»“ ““ Vsriarc-s mav he granted to tho provisims of this Chapter Subd.l6.Section lO.OS. in accordance tvith de Fn"s>°'nc Area-. The CouncU may grant Snbd.lT.” “=‘ a variance 'a’ Submits a detailed rTSle^tg Se:"S,afwm'no?^\SS"nf^ opaque in winter,I^dscanine plan wich shall provide B.Submits four y“f P‘""™Vntessty landsLpinf and plantmg (as that in each year 1995) be planned “a^ va^'t^s -:rr^^r:ir;3rl.;-s s s.'s-:s t f-i -s;,- - Subd. 18. Regulation of Structures V. asif f^« f®"**trtiiv hv reference and mahes a part of P iggiiacludinfi sections The City hereby ad.ro by 'fp as codified on May 21. 198l«Uuom s;r» i. ti—. Subdl?.Semnka ciervation Dismct upon the '*-;''^^ri,os and u all or a portion or boat slips orpenaming to rball have a longer d^cR.n_^ weTfa^Tof the citiro of Orono so requires. r • «** • S'^SECTION 3. AdoP-- immediately upon publication. Adopted by the City Coun 1995, by a vote of 4 ayes and 0 nays. cil of Orono.<>“ Edward J. CalWn, Jr., Mayor/ di2^ Cicy Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 6, 1995 ITEM NO.: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2020 James Bruce, 565 Leaf Street A.Vacation of Easement B.Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA Total lot area = 6.0006 acres Additional Exhibits K - Amendment of Covenant to Slielows Addition Brief Review of Application The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at both their May and June meetings. At the May meeting the Planning Commission was advised by neighbors in attendance that the covenants for the Stielows Addition would require an amendment »f the subdivision was to be legal according to the private covenants. Planning Commission advised the applicant that they would prefer tabling the application to ensure covenants were amended before presenting the application to the Council. Members did note that the application was complete except for the matter of the amendment of the private covenants. Review Exhibit K, applicant has submitted an amendment to the covenants allowing for the tliree lot division. A.Vacation of easement. The engineer has reviewed the original easement area dedicated in the plat of the StieFows Addition that intersected Lot 6. He could discern no reason tor the ambitious designation. If mem.)ers have an opportunity to visit the site, you will find the drainageway is no greater than 4 ’-5’ in width. The emiineer recommends the vacation of the original drainage easement and the rededication of a 20 ’ drainage easement 10’ to either side of the center line of the drainageway wiJi the plat of Fox Hollow. The resolution approving the vacation will be formally acted on at the time the final plat of Fox Hollow is presented for formal action. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 July 7, 1995 Zoning File m020 B.Preliminary subdivision of three lots. All three lots meet the required area. Applican; has acquired an additional tenth of an acre with a lot line rearrangement to be approved by the Council at this meeting (Application #2021). Lot 3, the east lot line does not meet the required 200 ’ width to the rear of the 50’ front/street setback measured at 199.98’. Planning Commission members noted at their May meeting the inability of applicant to acquire the additional frentage at the northeast lot line. Members also noted that the property is sewered. An existing lot of record could be built on without variances if the lot measured 160* width (80% of 200 ’). Lots 1 and 2 shall be served by a private road, Oxford Road along the west lot line. Lot 3 would continue to use an existing driveway at Leaf Street. The existing cul-de-sac would remain until the development of Lots 1 and 2. The driveway serving the guest house on Lot 2 will also remain while structure is occupied. Staff recommends that the driveway be removed when new residences are to be constructed in order to minimize the impact on existing planted areas. Based on proposed location of residences, on Lots 1 and 2, it would be more efficient to require access from Oxford Road for new construction. All lots shall be served by sewer from Oxford Road. The property has already been .'.ssessed one sewer unit. Two additional sewer units at a cost of C24,225 each shall be paid prior to final plat approval. The private sewer line to serve Lot 3 will be located along the shared iot lines of Lots 1 and 2, review your preliminary plan. Exhibit J. Review E.xhibit E-2, the engineer has asked for a 15’ wide utility easement at the north side lot line of Lot 1 to allow for future sewer service to church property. The P'anning Commission was concerned with the impact on the mature trees within that area and asked that the City Engineer meet with developer to determine a second location that would have less impact on the existins amenities. Staff has met with Jim Bruce on the site and found that the utility easement could be relocated adjacent to the redesignated drainageway within Lot 1 at the south side. The new location would have no impact on mature plantings nor would it impact the building envelope of the lot. The developer has advised that the shed on Lot 2 would be removed prior to final plat approval. The existing residence on Lot 2, the former guest house, may cither remain to be a part of the principal residence or as an accessory structure with expanded living space but with no kitchen. Structure can never function as a separate residential unit because the property lacks the area requirement for a non-rental guest house use. The future owner will be asked to execute a covenant if the structure remains as a separate accessory structure with living area to alert all future owners that the structure could never serve as an independent residential unit. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 July 7, 1995 Zoning File #2020 The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the three lot preliminary subdivision application of James Bruce and adopted the nine conditions set torth in the staff memo of May 3, 1995 and added the following: 1.Relocate 15 ’ utility easement providing future sewer service to church property to the east. The relocated sewer easement shall minimize any impact on mature trees or existing amenities within Lot 1. 2.The existing driveway that extends from Lot 3 to the cul-de-sac ot Lots 1 and 2 shall remain while residence structure on Lot 2 is occupied. Staff also recommends that this drive not be used by construction vehicles once new residential construction commences for Lots 1 and 2. Curb cuts as defined within access plan, Exhibit H, prepared by applicant shall be installed once building permits have been issued for new construction. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A.Vacation of easement. To ccnceptually approve the vacation of the drainage easement within Lot 6 of the Stielows Addition and to direct staff to prepare the necessary vacation resolution at the time the final plat. Fox Hollow, is submitted for final plat approval to the City Council. B.Preliminary subdivision. To either amend or adopt the enclosed approval resolution approving the preliminary plat of Fox Hollow. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A THREE LOT PLAT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 565 LEAF STREET -FILE NO. 2020 WHEREAS, James W. Bruce, on April 21, 1995, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Sticlov* Addition. That part of Lot 2, Block 1. Klitzke Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast comer of said I^t 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 2 a distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 19 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East a distance* of 155.00 feet and said line there terminating, Hennepin County, Minnesoia (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15, 1995, and June 19, 1995, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 10, 1995, the Orono City Council considered the application of James W. Bruce, noting the following findings of tact; 1.The propeny is located within the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of land within each newly created lot. 2.The propeny contains approximately 6.0006 acres. Pace 1 of 5 3. The proposed plat contains three lots each meeting the required minimum two acre area requirement. 4.Section 10.55, Subd. 15 (A-2) as property is sewered, the drainage area within the property can be credited as dry buildable area for density credit. 5.A two inch lot width variance shall be granted for proposed Lot 3 based on the following findings: A.Developer has been unable to acquire additional lands from church property to the immediate north. B.Per Section 6 (A-2) existing lots of record that are greater than I acre and served by public sanitary sewer may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if Council finds that: (1)It is at least 1 acre in size and the average width of a lot is at least 100’. (2)It is served by public sanitary sewer. (3)The lot otherwise meets the requirements of Zoning Chapter or other applicable City codes. C.No other variances to lot standards are requested. D.The two inch deficiency would have a negligible impact on the placement of a residence on this property. All three properties are located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. All lots will be served from an existing municipal sewer line within Oxford Road to the immediate west of the property. 8.All lots can be developed with new residential construction without the need of any variances to the lot standards of the LR-IA Zoning District. 9 There is adequate capacity within the sewer lines adjacent to the property to support two additional units. Page 2 of 5 6. 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Crono hereby approves the preliminary plat for James W. Bruce at 565 Leaf Street per the survey dated April 20, 1995 by Ted Kemna, a licensed surveyor, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant to execute an amendment to the original maintenance agreement for the Stielows Addition dealing with the obligation of Lots 1 and 2 to share in the maintenance and upkeep of Oxford Road, a private road of the City. 2.Designation and dedication of a 20’ wide drainage easement over the drainageway that intersections Lot 1 as shown on the preliminary plan. Existing drive that extends from Lot 3 and cul-de-sac within Lots 1 and 2 shall remain while guest house on Lot 2 is occupied. When the use of the residence is complete, then western extension of drive and cul-de-sac shall be removed by developer. No construction vehicles on Lots 1 and 2 shall be allowed to use existing drive. All access for new construction on Lots 1 and 2 shall be from approved driveway entrances at Oxford Road. Fumre owners or developer shall provide detailed engineering plans and specs for the extension of municipal sewer to Lot 3. Plans shall address the connection to the municipal sewer line and repair of Oxford Road per engineer’s report of May 3.1995. 5.Subdivider has agreed to remove the accessory structure on Lot 3 prior to final plat approval. Existing residence structure or guest house on Lot 2 may never be used at a second residential unit or guest house as property does not meet requirement of LR-IA Zoning District. 6.Applicant to dedicate 15’ utility easement on the plat for future sewer extension to the church property to the immediate east. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.Record plat drawings in the fonn of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200’. Drawing to include: Page 3 of 5 i_.. ..... A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Ted Kemna of Schoell and Madson, Inc., a licensed surveyor, dated April 20, 1995. B.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10’ wide along all perimeter property lines and 5’ each side of internal property lines. C.Designation and dedication on the plat of Fox Hollow of a 20’ wide drainage easement over the drainageway that intersects Lot 1. W D.Designation and dedication of a 15* wide utility easement within Lot 1 for future sewer connection to church property. E.Utility (sewer) easements along shared lot lines of 1 and 2 to extend 10’ on each side of the internal property' line. Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. The applicant must provide cenified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.Applicant to provide an amendment to the private covenants for the Stielows Addition dealing with the obligation of Lots 1 and 2 to share in the maintenance and upkeep ot Oxford Road. Fees to be paid* Total due: ,$48.825* A. B. C. Final plat fee = $175.00 Legal review and filing fees = 5200.00 *Park Dedication Fee shall be based on Assessor ’s determination of the fair market value of the property at its undeveloped state. Please note that park fees w ill only be required for two of the three lots as a residence exists on one of the lots. The subdivider will be notified as soon as the Assessor has malie his recommendation. Page 4 of 5 I i fz' r t •*4 i:' H D.Payment of $48,450 for two sewer units ($24,225 for each unit based on 1995 fee schedule) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this lOlh day ot July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, Notary Public Page 5 of 5 ^ i. To: Date: Subject: Chair Petersen and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator May 3, 1995 #2020 James Bruce, 565 Leaf Street - Vacation of Easement/Preliminar>’ Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA List of Exhibits A -Application B -Applicant’s Addendum C -Plat Map D -Property Owners’ List E-1 Gustafson Report 4/28/95 E-2 Gustafson Report 5/3/95 .. o x. . i F -M. Braman Report 4/21/95. Senior Environmental Specialist. Schoell & Madson. Inc. G -Resolution No. 939-Final Plat Approval. Stielow Addition H -Access Location Plan 1-1-2 Tree SiTvey, i ree Location Map J -Preliminary Plan A.VACATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.12 - Vacation of drainage casement located in the plat ot Stielow Addition. The applicant has filed the vacation petition and has advised that he will not relocate drainaeeway. The applicant merely asks that the current ambitious designation ot the drainaceway be readjusted to more clearly define the acmal drainageway. Review Exhibit E, Gustafson notes no problem with the redesignation and states that a ■?0’ wide drainace easement would be adequate to define and safeguard the drainage path. Refer to preliminaiy- plat. Exhibit J, that locates the redefined 20’ drainage easement. Staff Recommendation To vacate the drainace easement within Lot 6. Block 1, Stielow Addition, subject to the condition that applicant rededicate a 20’ drainage easement over the existing drainageway as shown on preliminaiy plat of Fox Hollow dated April 20, 1995. I m Zoning File #2020 May 3, 1995 Page 2 B.PRELIMEVARY SUBDIVISION OF THREE LOTS, CLASS III Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Lot standards for LR-IA zoning district. Lot width variance - Lot 3 ,, •., Required = 200 ’ (Refer to Section 10.02, Definition 43 (A) - Required lot width for non-lakeshore lots. Width is measured to the rear of the 50’ street yard setback.) Existing = 199.98’ Variance = .02 ’ or .25" T* 2.Section 11.10, Subdivision 10 (C) - Class III Subdivision - Preliminary. 3.Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 (C). 4.Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 - Typical section for a three lot plat. Review of Preliminary Subdivision All three lots meet the required lot area. Lot 1 can credit area of 20 wide drainage easement as property is served with sewer. Lot 3 does not meet the required lot width shown at 199 98’. It lacks a quarter of an inch of lot width to the rear of the 50 street yard setbac . The applicant has been unable to acquire additional area from either the north or south of the property. The additional area has been acquired from the property to the immediate west of proposed Lot 2 and will be included as part of the area of Lot 2. The Purchase Agreenient tor the 0.10 acre has been included in your packets for the lot line rearrangement (Application #2021). All lots shall be served by sewer from O.xford Road. As already noted in the earlier sketch plan review, the lot has been assessed for one sewer unit. Two additional sewer unUs at a cost of $24 225 each must be paid prior to final plat approval. There is adequate capacity in the sewer lines in Oxford Road to allow hook-ups for two additional units. Note on your preliminarv plan. Exhibit J, the future sewer line will be located within an easement area along the shared'lot lines of Lots 1 and 2. Easements along this interior shared lot line should be shown at 10' from the center line rather than the normal 5’ on either side of the shared lot me. Upon application for a building permit for the development of Lot 3, the owner/budder will be responsible for providing a detailed plan of the connection and service extension. The plans to be in accordance with attached plates submitted by Gustaf.son with cleanouts spaced at a minimum of 100’ apart. w. Zoning File fflOlO May 3, 1995 Page 3 The Engineer has asked for a utility easement at a 15' width along die north^de lot line of Lot 1 to allow future sewer sen-ice to Church property^ Review Exhibit ^ ^at ot *e impact on mature trees? The property is not located withm the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The Engineer is asking the City to consider tiimre needs. The accessoiy strucmre on Lot 3 no longer will achieve credit of the residence on the propertv and upon final plat approval becomes a non-conforming sttucmre. consisren with orevious policy, the City would ask that the structure be removed within one >ear of tinal plat approval date if a building permit has not been issued for new residential construction on Lit 3^Ve existing residence' on Lot 2 i— either be a ftimre part of ' or may remain as an accessory structure wn.: -.xpanded living space but "'Jh “ structure can never function as a separate re .-dential unit because the property lacks the area reXment for a non-rental euest house use. The owner will be asked to execute a covenant if the strucmre remains as a separate accessory structure to alert all tumre owners that Structure could never serve as an independent residential unit. Review Exhibit F, the Environmental Specialist with Schoell and Madson has continued that there arnoTif^ 1 or 2 wetlands within the property. The only wet area would be the drainageway that intersects Lot 1. During the sketch plan review. Planning Commission members discussed the removal of the existing cul-de-sac and driveway. Note applicant has asked to keep the cul-de-sac because of unique landscape features. The cul-de-sac is located within both Lots 1 and *. and will receive major impact when the sewer line is installed. It is questionable whether applicant w^ld mats to retain the cul-de-sac once the property is offered for development. In act, tt may prove to be a problem for the future owners of Luts 1 and 2. Because of its property, it would never sene as a mmaround for either of the properties. Applicant should he questioned on this point. The Plannina Commission was concerned with the issue of tree removal with the oroDosed location of the future residence building on Lot I. Please refer to Exhibits B and 1- of the 3" larae mature trees, only 5 would be removed. Applicant wants to reassure Pbming Commission that this would not be a matter of clear cutting and that the valu. of propeny is based on the existence of those trees not their removal. „ r ‘-r rrr .ir r. “ turnaround on this property when adequate and safe access is already provided. 1. 3. Zoning File #2020 May 3, 1995 Page 4 The Park Commission reviewed the three-lot subdivision at their May meeting and recommended payment of cash in lieu of the acquisition of park lands or trailways. The park dedication fee would be based on only two of the three lots because a residence already exists on Lot 2.. rStaff Recommendation To approve the/fhree-lot preliminary subdivision application of James Bruce granting a lot width variance of .25" and the approval of two sewer units to serve two new lots within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, subject to the following conditions: Applicant to execute an amendment to the original maintenance agreement for the Stielow Addition dealine with the obligation of Lots 1 and 2 to share m the maintenance and upkeep of Oxford Road, a private road of the City. Payment of $48,450 for two sewer units prior to final plat approval. Dedication on the plat of Fox Hollow of a 20’ wide drainage easement over the drainageway that intersects Lot 1. Draiiiase and uiiliiv easements to be designated lO’ along the boundaries of each of the three lots and 5 ’ within internal lot lines except for the shared lot lines ot Lots 1 and 2 where a 10 ’ wide easement on each side of the shared lot line is required for the extension of sewer to Lot 3 and a 15 ’ easement along north side lot line of Lot 1 . Final resolve of the removal of the western portion of the northern driveway that extends from Lot 3 through to Lots 1 and 2 and developer to resolve issue of cul- de-sac as to whether it is to remain as a responsibility or shared improvement tor Lots 1 and 2. Future owner/builder of future residence on Lot 3 to provide engineering plans and specs for the extension of municipal sewer to Lot 3. Plan shall address the connection to the municipal sewer line and repair of Oxford Road per Engineer s report of May 3, 1995. Oxford Road will sustain damage during the period ot installation. Upon Council ’s approval of the preliminary plat, the City Assessor shall be asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land so that a park dedication fee can be determined for four acres of the total six-acre plat. Ihe park dedication fee must be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 4. 5. Zoning File #2020 May 3. 1995 Page 5 8.The accessory structure on proposed Lot 3 shall be allowed to remain for one year. The structure shall be removed if a building permit has not been issued by that deadline date. 9.The existing residence strucnire on Lot 2 may never be used as a second residential unit or guest house as property does not meet area requirements of LR-IA zoning district. .11 03^137/95 14:57 The cm’ OF oRao 612-473-735'012 X f CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION AFPUCATlOlvj^ it \ T PROPERTY LOCATION Siie address 565 Leaf street Property Identification Number (PID) _ 05117234JL 0014— abstract or____torrens"Please check one * Property AlUtcU legal description to appUcaticn. - Legal - Lot 6, Bik I, stieiow Additxon applicant NanK James Bruce Address 1055 E. Wavzata Rlvd.. «22_1 PliQiic(homc) 474-1059 City Wayzata> Mn.Zip5539iPhone (work) 475-2622 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______|4r. & Mrs. John mcCqv Address 5525 Hillside Circle, ^jjy Edina, Mn. Phone (home) 941-6920 Zip5 54 3 9 Phone (work) (attach list if more tlian one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check)X Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District LR-lA -. -^.-T *rrT.*r • . , • U‘» I - C. U ... V V V'V V PROPOSAL i‘2 i-tyTi jvr , Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites -• •>• *u w* • \ ; ‘/ij■.••» '•ftf •t w'W? ^ w W* to - ta* V MV ni ^r 4 V Number of Building Sites Existing Units New Umts Tout Units Proposed Gross L '.iity Minimum Lot Size Proposer. Use (check) Units per 2 Acres 8 7,120 ijq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land X_____Residential ________Other (specify) __________ C'-O ' XcU^( •*4V*(4 A A ^ V *..../ayoKBt pf fees (refer lo *appIic«tioa fees* listed below. Cooipieted ;^licttion form. Preliminary pla( informatioo on CertiHcatc of Survey. . . Certified Property Owners List of owners withiu 350* (you must obtain this list from Hcnacrin County Dcpwtmeo of Finance f.ibU^llcaiion. pWBe inach • »p««« li.. of «h« potioni you wUh uo.ir,rt of ib.s .pplicnoo, Zoiting OfYkiaJ's Sigruture ___________________________________-—----------------------------------------- - MINIMUM MATERIAL REgUlKED FOR COMPLETE FINAL AITLICATION 1.Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval le.solution and park fees if nppicable). 2.Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3.Title opinion. 4.Easements, covenants, etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. 2Umisg Official ’s Sigoanire ------------------—-------------------------------------‘ 1.APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check fXl those which apply) A.Appikailioii Bose Fees: Sketch Plan Review (Class I. n i III) $200.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rcairangcineut S300 00 Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $300.00 Preliminary Subdivision Application $3‘25.00 + $25.00/lot (Class III A nJI non-resi en la Final Plat Application (Class III) $175.00 _____ Legal Keview and Filing; Subdivision only $75.00 Subdivision w/ea.icmcnts and covenants min. $200 00 Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) Legal ;jid Engineering Review Pees (as incurreU) Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $150 00 (No change from origiuiU ^ -------- Renewal of Class HI. Preliminary Subdivision Application $150 00 (No change from ongloal «pp ic.ition) -------- Renew;U of Hnal Class 111 Subdivision Application $100.00 (No change froui oriKuul application) Totall lin. ft. a .50 * $_ Un. ft. 3t .50 ■ $_ D.Special Improvemcot Fees: Proposird Private Roads $600 00 + S.50dlncal ft., Propostjd Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineaI ft.; ' Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $9<)0.00 • Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + Sl.Vsnib -- Proposed Watermain Exicnsioo 52.^0.00 $25/stub " Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding tulveils) $200.00 — On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applicaiious) $50.00/ncw lot proposed for on*sitc x . ocw lot.s — C.Flexible Application Fe«/Misc. Fees Variance $200.00 Easemcm Vacailon Asiociaicd wiib Subdivision $75 00 — PRD ApplicaiiOO with Subdivision $30.00/Dwclliu^ Unit ~ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or roquested by addS'al Attorney Plaiuitng CommisjierrY'd Council necess.ary to process this application and funher .ip.ees p y DateOwner’^ .qignaiurc _ AonliciDt must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning ComnuNsion tnccting. meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicant.s must be present at all scheduled review meetings J Commfssion and Council. If xn applictint is unable to attend a .scheduled mceUnp. plea.se make arrangemems to have lui aulbon agenl attend in your place and to advise the Building A Zoning Office of Uu$ change piior to the meeting. J A M K S W .Bruce li O M K S IT' ' i ;•1 t- DATE: April 21, 1995 RE: Members o-f the Planning Commission City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P Q Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn.cr -r FROM: James W. Bruce Homes Preliminary Plat Application for 565 Leaf Street (P.I.D. # 05117234 10014) PROPOSAL. & COMMENTS: 1.3 lots of 2 acres each. We have an agreement to purchase 1/10 of an acre from the adjoining property to the west to meet the 2 acre per lot requirement. We will provide city with copy of contract confirming our purchase of that property prior to May I5th. Our intent is to complete this lot line rearrangement by simple metes and bounds division. 2.We request a lot width variance for lot 3. The width is a fraction of one inch less than the required 200 ft. 3.Lots 1 and 2 will have driveway access from Oxford Road; lot 3 will have access on existing drive from Leaf St. We would request that removal of the asphalt surface east and west of line between lots 2 and 3 be done when first home is built on either lot 2 or lot 3. This will provide us with access to existing house until that time. Surface in cul-de-sac would be removed at same time. 4.We request vacation of existing drainage easement running east to west on lot I, to be replaced by proposed drainage easement shown on Preliminary Plat. This change does not change physical location of existing drainage ditch; it only redefines easement to 10' on each side of existing drainage way. 5 Proposed pad locations for future homes are shown on the Preliminary Plat. Alternate sites exist on each lot, which may be the preference of our customers when purchasing lots. 10*1 j K. \Vav/.U;i BKd., Siiiir 223. Way/aia. .Minncsoia 55391 (()I2) 475-2022 T.AX (012) 475-3020 M \TV- , O , J i ■..4 I understand and agree with the concerns‘expressed by"memeers of/ the Planning Conutiission regarding mature trees located in the'^^ proposed pad on lot 1. I am interested in not removing a major portion of trees on the site. Of the 25-30 large mature trees on lot 1, I have identified only 5-7 that would be removed. I Mould hope to meet with any concerned Planning Commission members on the site before the next meeting at their convenience. I will also prepare a tree survey prior to that meeting. 6.The proposed sewer service connection to lot 3 is shown on the Preliminary Plat. 7.Schoell 8c Madson, our engineering consultant, conducted a site visit to locate wetlands. According to the attached letter, no wetlands exist on the site. Their understand!ng is that permits from U. S. Corp of Engineers and the MCWD would be applicable only if wetlands exist on site. Please advise. Respectfully Submitted, James Bruce / JMBibk Enclosures:25 copies of Preliminary Plat and reduced copy and mylar Certified list of property owners within 350' and self addressed labels Application and Fees Letter from Schoell 8< Madson Environmental Specialist • I 0 z r mm MIC ovii/BATCH 5MGNNU MHi M 04-117-tS IZ 00120S17B SUSSEX HON N i D C mLDNAN V •HENNEPIN COUNTY PKOKRTY XNFO^TIQN SYSTCH'PROPERTY QMCRS LIST . .53 OA-117-23 52 00X50057S SUSSEX CXRN H i 0 C mLOHAN PROP.ADOR CStCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHC/AOPR PROP ADOR QNNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 53 0S*117-E5 A1 002A 00555 OXFORD RO COmCLZA D KLITZKE CORNELIA D KLITZKE 555 OXFORD RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 53 05-117-25 44 0005 05500 FOX ST N L TRUBECK A J N TRUBECK NILLIAH L A JUDITH H TRUBEK 5500 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55556 REPORT NO. PI455401PAGE 55>•.. .ii.S8 04-117-25 55 001005175FOK STOAVIO A MAASSTAXPAYERNINA M 3 DONALD C MILOMAN .6CRAL0 R A MARY JD ARNESQN DAVID A MAASSNAHE/AOM 743 SPRING HILL RDNAYEATA til 555P1 180 SPUR CIRMEDINA FM 55391 •?..y V:r ♦f ' • P 0 BOX 392L0N6 LAKE F94 55356 ♦*.• S3 3i-117-25 41 0010 i -i 53 05-117-25 41 0011 38 05-117-23 41 0014 PROP ADOR 0047S OXFORD RO 00495 OXFORD RD • ■00565 LEAF ST OM«R NAME 0 E FISHER JR 3 A 6 FISHER D I H GEORGE *«J A C MC COY TAXPAYER ORVILLE E 3 ALEXANDRA FISHER DONALD E GEOR«JOHN L A CHARLENE M MC CQY 'NAHE/AOOR 473 OXFORD RO 495 OXFORD RO i- 4 • 5525 HILLSIDE CXR •*■:• LONG LAKE tfl 55556 LONG LAKE MN 55556 EDINA HN 55459 V 13 OS-117-25 41 0015 53 05-117-25 41 0019 i .53 05-117-25 41 0020 PROP AODR 00500 OXFORD RO 00465 LEAF ST 00525 LEAF ST OMNER NAHE A J 3 3 K NELS0r4 MAG KORONKIENICZ JR i JONATHAN CHAPEL TAXPAYER AL3XN J i SUSAN K NELSON HALTER J KORONKIENICZ •‘ JONATHAN CHAPEL A CHURCH OF NAME/AODR 500 OXFORD RO ORONO MN 55356 465 LEAF ST LONG LAKE m 55556 V .. RELIGIOUS SCIENCE 525 LEAF •s 5S 05-117-23 41 0025 00575 OXFORD RO J T HALE ASS HALE JAMES T HALE A SHARON S HALE 575 OXFORD RD LniG LAKE ftl 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0004 03250 FOX ST DOtAU LUKIS DONNA LUKIS 3250 FOX ST LONG LAKE m 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-25 45 0004 03400 FOX ST JAMES G FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUMBER CO P 0 BOX 30 MPLS m 55440 38 05-117-25 44 0005 03400 FOX ST JAMES 6 FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUMBER CO P 0 BOX 30 MPLS MN 55440 01r*) J*"/ Cv‘ ••* I» ■•»•* • \• If- .» •. . •. r •• • •. 'J • •' ' ■ "7 ♦• •■■V ■ ^ : ••.I--;; •*» » PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NA»«/AD0R TOTAL BATCH 514 00015 • J • w m Bonestroo Rosene An€Jerlik£t IvJl Associates Engineers & Architects .^s 4jjwX -»rej «r f ^ ve ^cr on iousi CoDorn^ty O t:q G 8t>re\!fOO PI Pcoe*? M Pcsene Pf * .asW'C Anoer.-* ®€ ' cnaffl E PE Seno Cr'^.Ji P£ ’'r-c-rr^t f ^ ’E tece'T G Srn-ntcm p| SwiV' V iDe^'.n CPA *Se?* J' ^-'>iu lJn| May 3, 1995 3 A S^nfo'd Pf >f A G^!’*3on . P« P.5Ce*! ? P*rt^er»e ®E J i- »'j A ► n:e» D<««‘C G lz\*c:s '*£ Poee'T C MA ,C-'. A acu'J.:'' PE V.v» A Har\on P| 1 Pf % j !k ' - c: ^E P A i A C Bu’qjftJ* PE A Sy'*0 -E E*e<ie' c j *g ’E -' •e V.*"'X*/ =E A n V ft'.iet C L>nch Pf P V-«i«<n<J Pf , C Pe'tjtcn Pf I -r? J A'l'neA Pf Pf ? Rc.'s P{ W'f A i<^.s H G a»v a Viorirn P£ P i G^^VXX' A • A ^Ao^ei j fj^e»*on Pf A 7ic* fjr Pf **Ti: p J C^srffce'! PE V.lft 0 ’A>l:tl Pf V*«es B ;ensen P| . ^ i>io G^^ve* Pf GtJ v C «r •!-*'?/ Bfutnt G^qe Pf He rn P v.w Pf rc?ug!««s J 6r«o»t. Pf GuitV: y Pf Cec HO 0 ‘iv e* 'f P,Kii 0 Heuef Pf :e» pf D<ir O Boyu'T PE ieff^ J £n*er»nge» Pf jo^eor P ?he«n pf Lee M VI.rtn *>! Ch.«ir!. A £f '*.*•, Leo M P^weiUy M C‘ion A jres M P ng i.'O'e* ® E'^je ’hArdT WM 5 V5^ Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crysta l, Minnesota 55323 Re: Fox Hollow File No. 139-2020 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the sewer service for Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Fox Hollow subdi\’ision. Lots 1 and 2 can be served by the existing service connections at the east right-of-way line of Oxford Road. Service to Lot 3 will require a connection to the main sewer line under Oxford Road. The service extension will follow the lot line behveen Lots 1 and 2. The connection and service extension should be in accordance with the three attached plates, with cleanouts spaced at a minimum of 100 feet apart. A 10 foot utility easement should be provided on each side of the service to Lot 3. An additional 15 foot utility easement should be provided on the north line of Lot 1 to provide future sewer service to the church property. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very' truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOCIATES, INC. latent Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 'JerSf 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 ■ ©^1 Bonesfroo Rosene ^ Andcriik & ^1 Associates En0fn*«ra A ArcMIaela SI. Paul Mlnn«ao<a V ------= STANDARD DETAILS SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION Lost Revision: Nov. 1988J 0RA Plate 3-05 City Plote No. SER-1 ii n-nwr. r O’ Service Riser 4" Extra Heavy CISP or Approved PVC — Sewer Main © l/ll Bonestroo ^=jg Rosene &=5 Anderlik & ^1 Associates Englrf^rw A Arch(l«cit SI. Paul. Mlnncsolft 92 .3-07.PW0 g;TANnARD DETAILS SERVICE RISER Last Revision: Oct. 1989 '"BRA Plata No^j 3-7 N______________ SER-3 NOTE: Cleonoul cap shall be Minneapolis standard. NOTE: Enclose long sweep bend or combinotion wye In concrete as shown. ^Tr=Mil =Tr=imi 4-L CISP Cleanout Riser with threaded brass plug USP 4-22 or equal. ■\-L FNH OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT V ) J Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk A AssociatesM Enginm^rw & ArchM«cl* 91.Paul. MInnavota ?;tandard details SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS Lost Revision: Nov. 1988 BRA Plole No. 3-09 Cily Plate No SER-4 oo_2..-}9 AR R —FRI e « t #2020 F . o ir a SCHOELL Sk MADSON, INC £NGINEESS • • ^LANa'JESS SCL ”c3Tl\G • £N'.''PCN iV=\'^AL SESV.CES ,CSBO vr-'^vIA-A eC.uBVAP= • (612)8<»6-76ai • FAX (8121 643-3065 April 21, 1995 Mr. James Bruce James Bruce Homes 1055 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata. MN 55391 Dear Mr. Bruce: On April 19. 1995 we conducted a site visit to determine if any wetlands existed on the site identified as Stielows Addition. Lot 6. Block 1, Orono. Minnesou Based or . Lb«“Lns no wetlands are present on *e si-.e. There is a wetland located on the adjcmmg property to the north. This wetland does not extend omo the site. Very Truly Yours, Schoell & Madson, Inc. Marshal Braman Senior Environmental Specialist ______________ A—•—V . leQVAL C=ar50-UN:-Ty SV1PL3V5B hi RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP STIELOWS ADDITION FfLe CM.4*a-c 2 y wy. i rv- 5*1 s •- WHEREAS, the City of Orono !• « aunlclpol corporatloo organized and exlaclng under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulatlotiS for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Jurgen Stlelow, Lynn Charlson, Clyde Scribner and the New Thought Center, Inc., the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, Including; -Dedication on the plat of rights of way for public streets and roads shown as County Road No. 84. •Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot B to be known henceforth as Oxford Road. Concurrent' with the creation of this private road, the Suodlvlder has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement (Exhibit A) granting to the City permanent access, iaiprovement and utility easeoents over said Outlot; the Subdivldcr has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements (Exhibit B) over said Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots; and the Subdivider has created certain maintenance covenants (also Exhibit B),wherein eaca of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to r I/ permanently maintain and pay^the^cosr of maintenance .forlrt^r^yj said private road. •' *-Dedication to the City ofV*Floi«ge’and CooaervatloBi^P^K«3«WrSiMB ‘ Easement (Exhibit C)(’of wetlands and/or dralnagewayajdesctlbed(thereia -Execution of a Subdivider * a .Agreement(l^iblt D). . . for installation of certala^l«provsmenta.aa_^condl^ooi|| of subdivision approval»‘^J|g^viv <'? ■•SL? ..7'ji -'.p-J-eot to the City of awaAjBedlcatloaTee^latthefamoani . ■ -V-' A su I, • •». . l, r ^ ,v ' *i IV ti i- K ^-■fe:-- '*4 % w'^1;u feEto' ?- w ^ '• i r-'-.:I. H- ' '•r r*l • •< *B ■ • T ;J*tf *1 >i*. &?•; i. tTiSr' ' »■ \te'i *r.“ • 1^. ■•.. •. . I'f-: •' ■^- -’I ’ ^ ;’lV is4 ■ ..V# -■•*»> ' f 1 Preliminary Plat of:FOX HOLLOW JAMES BRUCE HOMES d4K-ArionS w-VJ* s • §f Iv*' j- ’■. \rz •S4 /□ ________/ I 11^ II ■■ I ^ii. fa _ ______. T f.If ' / • Lbi'•95^ ^ A ' .0 . — n s^s=-^ ^irr-.ss • ••.— r=.^- / / T*: >i '^•>' ■Jt’ht ^~i's.-nr :^?1' 0 , ', v ■^<- / he9*d ? '5 V vzio^ ■—t,QCAtm> hi Drz r^o' A ^ ,/. se9*^2 '5 ^ • »2 i!l esoc^s • Q^C^ Pilicr mJ U> r— />» r r'n \;\ \ J'l'II -^Ito '1'ilSlS «i| i^f|f-Jl5 Usil • i^* rar-a^ ^ *3 ^------(f-:a;7 /y'5, -JC I f-* t-' /* f* *># /•./ LOT 1, FOX HOLLOW, ORONO TREES OVER 12” IN DIAMETER (LOCATION SHOWN ON LOT DRAWING) 1.30 ••Oak o m 24“r> 3.15"7 4.36"Oak 5.14"Mapl e 6.18"Maple 7.24 "Oak 8.24"o 9.14"Oak 0.24-Oak 1.15"Oak 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 15"Oak 23.18"Oak 12"Oak 24.15"Oak 22"Oak 25.16"Oak 20"Oak 26.20"Oak 18"Oak 27.20"Oak 18“r>28.24 "Oak 16"7 29.30"Oak 20"Oak 30.15"o 12"Oak 31.18"Oak 20" 18" Oak Oak 32.18"Oak baaPO>R)seD_\ \ \eeuc^u" Pl/lK071^^ cviO 3:^0(t) % \ r:;f Urcy^QOQ VC Jl0 nsement,dr- - •?z •^SG — <n vt ^v]pc !fl \l O O.^a 7 1/ - S/ieJ ) / >’ T f \ '»» 2 ^y< 5’ V/ic/e Pod •\ 1 * ^ ' V ^ /.XV^ / COo\ ill v% ( ' v'^ /[\^^M// / P<^ofure Ll. —_ITTIZc^ \ / Cone Or #'■ V VV- '<’?!■. ‘er £J / . . ✓ I /■ SECOMD EMEIIDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS AMENDMENT, entered into on the day of , 1995, by and among F. DENNISON SHAW, JR. AND JANET SHAW, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "SHAW"); ALBIN J. NELSON AND SUSAN K. NELSON, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "NELSON"); REX L. CARTER AND CHERYL D. CARTER, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "CARTER"); CARL O. KEIL AND SALLY B. KEIL, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "KEIL"); ORVILLE E. FISHER, JR. AND ALEXANDRA G. FISHER, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "FISHER"); DONALD E. GEORGE AND MARLENE M. GEORGE,husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "GEORGE"); CORNELIA D. KLITZKE AND LOREN J. KLITZKE, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "KLITZKE"); JAMES T. HALE AND SHARON S. HALE, husband and wife (hereinafter re ferred to as "HALE"); JOHN L. MCCOY AND CHARLENE M. MCCOY, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "MCCOY"). RECITALS A.On September 21,1978, Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("Declaration") were executed re stricting the title to Lots 1 through 8, Inclusive, Block 1, and Outlet B, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota which declaration was filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on September 27, 1978, as Document No. 1295753; and filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder on September 29, 1978, as Document No. 4416070. B.Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition was replatted into Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition by plat dated May 17, 1979, and filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on May 31, 1979. • C.Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Stielows Addition, were replatted into Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition by—n* plat recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder on October ' 30, 1980, and recorded with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on October 29, 1980. D.The First Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("First Amendment") made by all the mortgagees of the original Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, Stielows Addition and at least six of eight owners of said Lots was made on June 26, 1981, and filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on November 6, 1981, as Document No. 1446866. E.On the date hereof all the Owners and all the Mort gagees of record of the original Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, —^<11» St:ielov8 Addition, including Lots 1 and "1, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition and Lots 1 and 2, Block Klitzke Addition^ are as follows: 1.Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition (for merly part of Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition) is owned by F. Dennison Shaw, Jr. and Janet Shaw, hus~' band and wife with mortgages of record in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America; Norwest Mortgage, Inc.; and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 2.Lot 2, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition (for merly part of Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition) is owned by Carl O. Keil and Sally B. Keil, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of citibank, N.A., as Trustee under that certain pooling and servicing agreement dated as of December 1, 1993, for Multi-Class Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate Series 1993-0 Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation; and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 3.Lot 2, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by Orville E. Fisher, Jr. and Alexandra G. Fisher, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of FBS Mortgage Corporation and First Bank National Asso ciation. 4.Lot 3, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by Donald E. George and Marlene M. George, husband and wife with mortgages in favor of Norwest Mortgage, Inc. and Investors Savings Bank FSB. 5. Lot 1, Block 1, Klitzke Addition is owned by Cornelia D. Klitzke and Loren J. Klitzke, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. and GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania. 6.Lot 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition is owned by James T. Hale and Sharon S. Hale, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. and First Minnesota Savings Bank, FSB. 7.Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by John L. McCoy and Charlene M. McCoy, husband and wife. 8.Lot 7, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by Albin J. Nelson and Susan K. Nelson, husband and wife with mortgages in favor of First Bank St. Paul; Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.; and Washtenaw Mortgage Corporation. L,_. 9.Lot 8, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by Rex L. Carter and Cheryl D. Carter, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Residential Fund ing Corporation and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. F.It is the intention of the parties hereto to amend the Declaration and First Amendment with regard to resubdividing of said Lots. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements of the respective parties hereto, the which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, consisting of the Owners, their spouses, contract vendees, and life tenants holding a record interest in not less than six of the nine Lots made up of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Stielows Secon Addition, Lots 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition, of the holders of all mortgages upon all Lots in Stielows Second Addition and Klitzke Addition, and Lots 2, 3, 6, 7 anc 8, all in Block 1, Stielows Addition, agree as follows: I.The Declaration and First Amendment are hereby amended by deleting Article III, paragraph 1(a) and substituting therefore the following: 1)Non-exclusive and appurtenant easements are hereby granted and established in fa vor of each Lot or subdivision of a Lot which has access to Outlot B, Stielows Addition (also known as Oxford Road) and the Owners thereof; as follows: a)Tnaress and Earess An easement for roadway purposes upon that part of the Property described as Outlot B, Stielows Addition and which easement is outlined in red crosshatching on Exhibit A, attached to the original Declaration. II.The Declaration and First Amendment are hereby amended by adding to Article IV, paragraph 1 the following: In the event subdivision of a Lot, as approved hereunder, results in more than nine (9) lots with access to Outlot B, Stielows Addition, then owners of all resulting lots with such access shall share equally in said costs along with the Owners of the other Lots with access to said Outlot B.If said subdivision iresul^s in a lot with no access to said Outlet B, then the Owner of said resulting lot without access shall have no liability for said costs. areIII.The Declaration and the First J^endment hereby amended by adding to Article V, para graph 3 the following: In the event more than nine (9) lots result from the subdivision of any lot as allowed hereunder, then such shorter setback shall be approved by seven (7) Owners. IV.The Declaration and the First Amendment are hereby amended by deleting Article V, para graph 6 and substituting therefore the follow ing: (6)Division of Lots.No resubdi vision of a Lot shall be allowed without amendment of this Declara tion, except that subdivision of Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition into four resulting lots, none of which shall be less than two (2) acres in area, is hereby approved. In any case no future subdivision shall be allowed which results in a lot of less than two (2)acres. After the lot division approyed herein, there will be ten lots with access to Outlot B, Stielows Addi tion (also known as Oxford Road), and the Owner of each lot with such access shall share equally in the maintenance and repair costs set forth in Article IV herein. V.The Declaration and The First Amendment are hereby amended by adding to Article V the fol lowing: (7)Rental. In the event there are two living units on any Lot (or a lot resulting from an allowed subdi vision of a Lot), such second living unit shall not be rented separately from the main living unit. An owner shall not be restricted from renting L an entire lot and the living unit thereon. VI.The Declaration and the First Amendment are hereby amended by adding to Article VI, para graph 2 the following: In the event more than nine (9) lots result from the subdivision of any Lot as allowed hereunder, then such amendment shall be agreed to by seven (7) Owners and all Mortgagees of record. ■yil. Except as otherwise amended herein, the Decla ration of Covenants, Conditions and Restric tions and the First Amendment to the Declara tion of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to above shall remain in full force and effect. VIII.The parties hereto do hereby consent that in the event any party endeavors to bring an ac tion for the addition of the original Declara tion, the First Amendment or this Second Amendment to the body of any certificate of title evidencing ownership of any of the lots restricted by the Declaration, the parties hereto consent to such addition to the body of any such certificate of title, and waive all rights to notice of commencement of a proceed ing subsequent to the initial registration of land brought to accomplish such addition and to the entry of an appropriate order of the court with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties het* "o have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. r-^ • {'Juul jk Ca (tcS Cheryl'-'D. Carter r^.i o Q. Carl. O. Keil Orville E. |^lshe^^^Jr. ✓ C KijLi^(U^ ^ herAlexandra G. MaVlene M. George Cornelia D. Klitzke ■Ldren J. Klitzke// ^ \\ -r* Lt^^' i t •• • % V-( Janlfes T. Hale / c Sharon S. Hale Charlene M. McCoy STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1995, by F. Dennison Shaw, Jr. and Janet Shaw, husband and wife. Notary Public f*-. ^ /i/iEETIK^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1 0 1995 DATE: July 5,MiaOHO ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabustb Tide Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2021 James Bruce/Jim Hale, 575 Oxford Road/565 Leaf Street - Subdivision of a Line Rearrangement - Resolution Additional Exhibits F - Amendment of Covenants of Stielows Addition Zoning District: LR-IA Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Amended Lot 2, Block 1. Klitzke Addition = 132.700 s.f. or 3.0464 acres Amended Lot 6, Block Stielows Addition = 261,384 s.f. or 6.0006 acres The profiosed lot line rearrangement provides the . 10 acres of area needed to complete the three lot subdivision of Fox Hollow (Application #2020). As noted in the staff memo of 5/1/95 included in your packets, the subdivision has no impact on required lot standards for the lakeshore lot within the LR-IA zoning district. The owner of 575 Oxford Road will grant a 5 drainage and utility easement along the newly defined shared lot line. At the time of the preparation of the final plat (Application #2020) the subdivider will also dedicate a 5' drainage and utility easement along the east side of the newly defined shared lot line. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the lot line rearrange roent as proposed. The enclosed resoiation has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed aj'proval resolution r ■> ■I r s A RESOLLTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 575 OXFORD ROAD AND 565 LEAF STREET FILE NO. 2021 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council ) has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within lire City; and WHEREAS, the Citv Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a \U Wt c^rrangemenl by James W. Bruce of James Bruce Homes and James T. Hale (ht.cim w the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: i.^t 2. Block 1, Klitzke Addition and Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinatter the property"); and W'HEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes. NOW ’, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono herebv approves the metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for James T Hale and James W. Bruce as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Theodore D. Kemna. a registered land surveyor of Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated April 24, 1995, and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: I,Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council, the owner ot Lot 6, Block 1.Stielows Addition must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. Page 1 of 2 2. r 3. 4. Owner of Parcel A shall grant to the City a 5* drainage and utility easement along the newly defined east lot line. The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Sur\ey shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before January 10, 1996 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessaiy- to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 10th day July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this lOlh day of July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 r % To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator May 1, 1995 #2021 James Bruce/Jim Hale, 575 Oxford Road/565 Leaf Street - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA Required = 87.120 s.f. or 2 acres Proposed Lot 2, Block 1. Klitzke Addition Proposed Lot 6, Block 1, Stielow Addition Pertinent Ordinances 132.700 s.f. or 3.0464 acres 261.384 s.f. or 6.0006 acres 1. 2. 3. Section 11.03, Dermition 65 (C) - Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. The Cit>- shall allow a Class I subdivision. We will request drainage and utility easement along newly defined lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition. Section 11.03, Definition 28 - Lot width. The shortest dimension between opposite lot lines measured at all of those points is required by the Zoning Chapter of the City Code and this Chapter. Section 10.02, Definition 43 - Lot width, 't he horizomal distance between side lot lines measured at the following locations: A.For lots which do not abut a lake or tributary, at the rear of the required front yard, measured parallel to the front lot line. B For lots wb.ich abut a lake or tributary, at the shoreline measured in a straight line between the points at which the side lot lines intersect the OHWL, and at the required structure setback from the OHWL, measured in a straight line between the points of •intersection of the side lot lines with the structure setback line. List of Exhibits A B C D E Application Property Owners' List Plat Map Purchase Agreement Survey of l^t Line Rearrangement Zoning File #2021 May 1, 1995 Page 2 Discussion The applicant has filed the necessary lot line rearrangement with an adjacent property owner in order to acquire 0.10 acre needed to file the three-lot division of Lot 6, Block 1, Steilow Addition. Applicant was unable to acquire land from the Church parcel to the nonheast and has entered into a Purchase Agreement with James Hale, the owner of the property located at 575 Oxford Road, refer to Exhibit D. The shed will be located 43.5 ’ (required 10’) and the principal structure 72’ (required 30 ’) from the newly defined side lot line. The Steilow Addition was approved by the City on September 13, 1978. At that time, lot width for Lot 2 of the Klitzke Addition would have required 200’ to the rear of the 50’ street yard. Per the new Shoreland Regulations approved by the City in 1992, lot width for a lakeshore lot is no lon£er measured to the rear of the street setback but at the lakeshore and at the strucmral setback. The lot line rearrangement will not impact the width requirements for the lakeshore lot. Parcel B will be combined with Lot 6, Block 1 of the Steilow Addition. The metes and bounds division will be immediately tiled with the County so that the area of Parcel B can be included as part of the tw'o-acre platted lot. Drainage and utility easements e.xist along the former shared lot line. The developer of the three-lot plat may be advised to vacate the easements as the City will ask for the dedication of a 5’ drainage and utility easement along the newly defined lot line with the formal three-lot plat. Mr. Hale will be asked to dedicate a 5’ drainage and utility easement along his side of the newly defined lot line as a condition of this subdivision approval. Staff Recommendation To approve the lot line rearrangement as proposed for the properties located at 575 Oxford Road and 565 Leaf Street, subject to the following conditions: 1.Ow ner of Lot 2. Block 1. Klitzke Addition to grant 5’ drainage and utility easement along the west side of the newly defined lot line. City to ask for the dedication of drainage and utility easements along the east side of the newly defined lot line with the formal plat of the *hree lots. Prior to scheduling the lot line rearrangement before the City Council, applicant’s survevor shall provide a sur\ey with signature lines for the Mayor of Orono, the City Clerk, all property owners w'ith an interest and a line for the approval date ot the City Council. The City shall also ask that the survey be amended to include Parcel C to be described as Lot 6. Block 1, Stielow Addition. i 03^t3T7/S5 14:57 ThC CITY CF OR»D 612-473-7357 012 ✓,0 ■7 j:. CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPUCATIOrT^^>- tT^ Site address r --------------------------------------^ ,; rropeny IdCTiiricjiion Number (PIP). ~V ^ ■«- ?3 cr»7^aiary/y' PlCJSe check one • Property abstract or tonenst Auacll legal description to application I J APPLICANT Name F^nO. fL Address 5 7<T ^>Cf^np l^D. City /^Eci^r> j K/ bL (^£uc^ Phone (homely V73 - _ Zip<?!L^Pho»g (work) f/^ce 'f^lO'C-CjC >cA^ iotA OWTSF.R (if different than applicant) Name Address City __Zip Phone(hoinc) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wtt Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) ______ PROPOSAL ^ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new builUhng sites) ” Subdivision for New Building Sites Existing Units New Units Total Units Number of Building Sites Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) __________ MINIMUM MATIIUAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICA 1.Payment of fees (refer to 'applicafioo fees* listed below. 2.Coinpletcd appliemion form. J.W'^loa. pl.».. ~f««« >i« «' ■"»>-”«« >"~ Zoning OfTicial*s Signature __ _ _ _ ___ _ ___^- -” minimum material required for complete final AITLICATION 1.Payment of fees (refer to Prcl.m.nary Subdivision Approval .ejdut.on and park .ees if nppiwble). 2.Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3.Title (pinion. 4.Easements, covenants, etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Zoning Official’s Sigeature______—-------------------—-----Dalt I.APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check fXl those which apply) A« Appliuition Bust Fees; ^^kcich Plan Review (C1 r >v I, II & III) $200.00 Subdivtsion of a Lot Line Rcarrangcincui S300 00 ------- J^bdivTsrn $25.00/lot (Class III & all non-rcsidemial) ____ Final Flat Application (Class HI) $175.00 Legal Review and Filing; Subdivision only $75.00 Subdivision w/ea.tcmcnts and covenants tnin. $200.00 Park Fees (to be deternuned per Section 11.62) Legal ?nd Engineering Review Fees (as incurred), . , *------- Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change from ongiual application) -------- Renewal of Class HI. Preliminary Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change from ong.nal apphcat.on) -------- Renew.m of Final Class III Subdivision Application SlOO.Otl (No change from onguial application) Tot .nil D.Special Improvemcot Fees: FroposixJ Fnvate Roads $600.00 $.50/llncal ft.; 'Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft.; lin. ft. .n .50 = $ tin. ft. * .50 - S_ Request for City to Accept Existing Prlv.nte Road $900.00 ^■ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250 00 + $25/stub —^ Proposed Watennain Eaicnsioo $2.50.00 -f $25/stub ~ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culveits) $200.00 — ^On-Site Systern. Site Evalmition Review (applicable to rural subdivision applicatious) '$50.00/ncw lot proposed for on-sitc x_____new lots • C.Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees Variance $200.00 ^ ~ Easement Vacation Asiociaccd wiib Subdivision $75 00 PRD Application wiin Subdivision SIO-OO/Dwclliug Unit ^ ■n,c 3ppliCiU.I hcrtby «|r«s u> prov.de «1 infcnriMion rcpulrcd or by SdS (CM established by ordmsTce.Date _________ Applicant’s SignsturcN^'^ Owner's .Signature ^Date //- 2 Z-' 9'j: *pplk»l mm. h.v, rb, .mo .he C.y Omcc :.c O.yr before .he Plom,,og '"X „cc o( tl.c PiBur-. mecirngi Be held on the th.rd Monday of e.ieh moMb. AppI.eama mus. be present a. all acheduled review m«nnss o ,u,l.onwi Commfssion and Conne.l, If an appi.eam is unable .0 ai.end a scheduled meent. please make airanpemems agent attend m your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Offtcc uf Uiis change puor to the meeting. /.ns Or: rj I RUN DATE 04/ia/RATCH 514AOORQNTCR NAMETAXPAYERNAME/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR CPt4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAI1E/ADDR PROP AOOR OI^R4£R NAME TAXPAYER NAflE/AODR r .r Il!Elt4EPIH COUNTY PRCR^RTY INFORHATIQI4 SYSTEM,PROPERTY OMCRS.tlSr •^ :r ^M 04-117-23 32 001203175 SUSSEX RON N i 0 C HILDMANNINA N I DONALO C HILDMAN745 SPRING HILL RONAYZATA m 55391 50 05-117-23 41 OOlO 00475 OXFORD RO 0 C FISHER JR I A G FISHER ORVILLE E I ALEXANDRA FISHER 475 OXFORD RO LONG LAKE ?tl 5S3SA 30 05-117-23 41 0015 00500 OXFORD RO A J A S R N£LS0t4 ALBIN J A SUSAN K NELSON 500 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 553S6 38 05-117-23 0024 00555 OXFORD RO CORNELIA D KLIT2KE CORNELIA D KL1T21KE 555 OXFORD RD LONG LAKE 5S3S4 38 05-117-23 44 0003 03300 FOX ST M L TRUCCCK A J H TRUBECK WILLIAM L I JUDITH W TRUOEK 3300 FOX ST LCR46 LAKE m 55356 38 04-117-23 St 0013100575 SUSSEX CIRN M A D C HILDMANGERALD R A MARY. JO A»4ESQN180 SPUR CIR •mOINA m 55391 38 05-117-23 41 OOll 00495 OXFORD RD DAM GEORGE DONALD E GEORGE 495 OXFORD RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 3d 05-117-23 41 0019 00465 LEAF ST NAG KOROfA^IEHICZ JR WALTER J KOROriKIEHICZ 465 LEAF ST LONG LAKE 194 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0025 00575 OXFORD RO J T HALE 4 S S JAMES T MALE A 575 OXFORD RO L0r4G LAKE MT4 *f. -i I t • MALE SHARON S HALE 55356 30 05-117-23 44 0004 03250 FOX ST OOtiNA LUKIS DOttU LUKIS 3250 FOX ST L0t4G lake MN 55356 I , •• REPORT NO. PI435401PAGE 55 «*38 04-117-23 33 001003175FOX STDAVID A HAASSDAVID A HAASSP 0 BOX 392LONG LAKE m 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0014 00565 LEAF ST J A C MC COY JOHN L A CHARLENE M MC COY 5525 HILLSIDE CIR EDINA MN 55439 38 05-117-23 41 0C20 00525 LEAF ST JOriATHAN CHAPEL J0r4ATHAN CHAPEL A CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE 525 LEAF L0T4G LAKE m 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0004 03400 FOX ST JAMES 0 FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUMBER CO P 0 BOX 50 MPLS rfl 55440 50 05-117-23 44 0005 03400 FOX ST JAMES 6 FULLERTON III ET AL FULLERTON LUTOER CO P 0 BOX 30 MPLS MN 55440 •u A’-VC^ » .. i i . PROP AOOR 0*'A4ER NAME TAXPAYER riAME/AODR TOTAL BATCH 514 00015 ) SttUO'^S o*' OV)^ •I :i}4 IB tti t^iC “ •„^co»75«/2? r#A 3P8 97 4 ?40V59'•:^ v" to. • *-.••* ^ TIE L 0 WS »2ND ADO. .,,-.5 ■i e V»A j.l — 2;< >'0 ABO •«. • /•' o St •" • to^'f 1 > 'O V »t. *. .. / t. , {■■■■, s v.A; •■>A ^ a’5^". ’ V" 1 ot 34 <■ f-t* ADD •:5V yAf KLITZKE , i-i *i/Mi)G c: ^ 2 (isl addition »^‘i 1 \/5-C’iv ‘ _z 4 «>••s ^ ^ A\4 II ' ^ ■:! JO^hiMp . f J; 5/0 T3 0" r ■T---------------- J ------l\i ''0‘ • i «“^tl ✓!v /3 4.* '• 4 V,*! 45 •'A «r»-fASJ A •• 1 RECEIVED OF4.____________rj '' 'f'-fS tha sum of n/^C- V Oottais (t J6 bMr'CHECKCASH440TE at aamaat monay to ba daposRed upon accaptanca of Puichaaa Apiaamant by all parties, on orI •* la r>m»i 7 bafoia tt»a nasrt busiitasa day after accaptatKa, In a trust account of Hstlrtg broker but to ba returned to ttuyar If Purchase & Agieamant Is not accapted by Sellar. Said earnest money is part payment tor the purchase of the property located at: a SUM Addm:S7S <^xr ,. /✓X'_______________________ Qiy oi __________________________________________________ County ol Af ___________ stale ol Miimesola, 11.Legafly descrtoed as tt. _ (■ 11 ir 14.U 1& fi ie c That part of Lot 2. Block 1. KLITZKE ADDITION, according to ttie recorded plat thtfcof, which lies easterly of the following described line 17.1 ia £ 19.i 20.i 21.. 22. Ccmmencmg at the southeast corner of said Lot 2. thence on an assumed bearing of North 69 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 2 a distance of 55 00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence North 19 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 155 00 feet and said line there terminating ind ing in fier cks inSy UKl'^ 21 al of which property Seller has this day agreed to .sell to Buyer tor sum of; ($. •■/•A ./^ ■f Co ■Y ^ •* Jf rj f t.» ^ f't fy^ ^r ' «« , _________ ^/r>ro Dollars, 2& »4iich Buyer agrees to pay in the tallowing manner; Earnest money of $—-------—=------------------------------------------------------------ 26 and »//. <f O__________________cash on _________________(G i ------the date of closing, and 27.the balance of $_____ 26 Conventional FHA Assumption Contract for Deed ' 11 '* I. 1|r^l t)/ financing in accordance with the attached addendum; Other:________AZ 29, This Purchase Agreement IS NOT subject to a contingency addendum. (If answer is IS. see attached addendum.) '(^NO^ubject to cancellation of 31.This Purchase Agreement IS /(^^N^])sub)ect to an Inspection Addendum, (If answer is IS. see attached addendum.) 32.Attached are other addenda which are made a part of this Purchase Agreement (Enter page or pages on line 2) 31 DEED/MARKETABLE TITLE: Upon performance by Buyer. Seller shall deliver a 34, joined in by spouse, if any, conveying marketable title, subject to; Warranty Deed 35.(A) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations: (B) Restrictions relating to use or improvement ol the property without 36 effeclivo todeiture provisions; (Q Reservation ol any mineral rights by the State of Minnesota; (D) Utility and drainage easements which do not 37.interfere with existing improvements; (E) Rights of tenants as follows (unless specified, not subject to tenances);------------------------- 38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39.(F) Others (Must be specified in writing); 46 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS shall be paid as follows; lATE OF CLOSING<SEL^ SHALL^.OWJATE-GF 42.of special assessments certified for payment with the real estate taxes due and payable in the year of closing. 43 BUYER SHALL ASSUME / SELLER SHALL PAY OiMlate ul ClUUmg all other special assessments levied as of the date of closing. 44 BUYER SHALL ASSUME / S^ER SHALL PROVIDE^OR PAYMENT jiE^^pecial assessments pending as of the date of this agreement for 45 improvements that have been ordered by the City Council or other assessing autfrorities. (Seller's .provision tor payment shall be by payment into 46 escrow of 2 limes the estimated amount of the assessments, or less as required by Buyer’s lender.) 47.BUYER SHALL ASSUME i(SELLER SHALL PAV c^ data otTtostng-any deferred real estate taxes (i.e. Green Acres, etc.) or special 48 assessments payment of which is required as a result of the closing of this sale. Buyer shall pay real estate taxes due and payable in the 49 year following closing and theieafter and any unpaid special assessments payable therewith and thereafter, the payment ol which is not 50 otherwise provided ''50 oinerwise provioeo — 51.As of the dale of tins acjiucnnent. Scitcr represents tftal Setter ‘IAS / ^AS NOT^Jreceivad a ndico d hearing tor a nwv pubic imprwement 52.project from any governmental assessing authority, the costs of which project may be assessed against the property. If a notice of ponding 51 special assessment is issued after, the date of this agreement and on or before the dale of closing. Buyer shall assume payment of 54.ALL / NONfe T'OTHER:_________________________of any such special assessments, and Seller stiall provide for payment on 55.date of closing r ALL /ViONE / OTHER'of any such special assessments. If such special 56 assessments or escfow amounts for said special assessments as required by Buyer’s lender shall exceed $----------------------------- 57 Purchase Agreement shall be null and void at Seller’s option; parties agree to sign cancellation ol Purchase Agreement and all earnest 56 money paid hereunder shall be refunded to Buyer, unless one or both of the parties agrees in writing on or before the date of closing, to 59.assume, pay. or provide lor the payment of such exces^/j 60.Seller and Buyer Initial; Seller(s)^___:__"liH.— DaleZ ------------^ Buyer(s) v. '-------------Dale --------------- 61.MN PA 1 (093)( own 1041 (BOJi =—) ,on or jrchaM ated at; nnesota, .) Dollars, sing,and Idendum; inty Deed rty without lichdonol istaliments m fKAL Etnrt hues ahal b» pM m IMowk ,10EBuyr»tfpWi WWIUreDFWOMOSafOFCLMW^ yaTHS, ALL, MQMB IQS Stiar Bhag pm PW)*UBTOTODWOFCU)8INa.^1gTM8. ALL.NONE iMl «BtatB taxM duf and payiM In tha yMr l9_£tS. IT tht •:c^^ o^i f 10S doa^ date b ctw^, tt« ml aasata tarn paid dtdl, if proratad, ba adM>t*d to the new doamg datai Sallar warrarta taxaa dua and 11Q payabia In tlw year l9_fZ±i__wffl ba PUU^MnTfi6hP>homeatead elasalflcatlon. If part or non-homaataad claaatficatlon la clrdad. 111.Sato agram to pay Buyer at cloatng S________________________________________________toMard the norvhomaaiaad 112.portton of the real estate taxes. Buyer agram to pay any remaining balance of ncxvhomeatead taxaa whan they become dua and pmdto 113.No tapreeentatlonB «a made concerning the amount of subeequent real estate taxes -.•k-s: :S8ION: Sato shall dellvar possession of the property not later than _4fiartioalng. fl 11& Al Interest, homeowner associafion dues, rants, fuel o8, liquid petroleum gas and alt chargee tor city water, city aewar, aiactriclty. and natural 11& gaa shal be prorated between the partiea aa of data of closing. Seller agrees to remove ALL DEBRIS AND ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY 117.NOT INCLUDED HEREIN from the property by possession data lift ENVnONMENIAL CONCERfS: *to the best of the Seller's knowledge there are no hazardous substances, or uidetgnxind storage tanka SNcept lift herein noted; 12Q 121.SPEOAL WARRANTIES: 122.SELLER WARRANTS THAT THE PROPERTY IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO: CITY SEWER DYEST^ CITY WATER DYES ipNO 123 ^LLER/BUYER AGREES TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TEST f^SULTS ANOA)R SEPTIC SYSTEM CERTIFICATION IF REQUIRED BY fcireto owe| 124.GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER. SELLER WARRANTS THAT ALL APPLIANCES. HEATING, AIR CONDITIONiNQ. WIRING 12& AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS USED AND LOCATED ON SAID PROPERTY WILL BE IN WORKING ORDER ON THE DATE OF CLOSING. 12a EXCEPT AS NOTED ON ATTACHED ADDENDUM. BUYER HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSINa 127.OTHER; 12a ia BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT NO ORAL REPRESENTATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING POSSIBLE PROBLEMS OF WATER laa IN BASEMENT, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER OR ICE BUILD-Ulf ON THE ROOF OF THE PROPERTY AND ^UYER RELIES 131.SOLELY 1N\THAT REGARD ON THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT BY SaLER 132.SELLER HAS / HAS NOT HAD A WET BASEMENT. AND HAS / HAS NOT TW5 ROOF. WALL OR CEILING DAMAGE CAU JED BY WATE 133 OR ICE BUILD-UP BUYER HAS / HAS. NOT RECEIVED A REAL EoTATE TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. / T«e 134.BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE TRUTH IN HOUSING INSPECTION REPORT,^(F REQUIRED BY 133 BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA 13a BUYER & SELLER INITIAL: Buyerfs) \ Selierfs) MUNiaPAUTY. STATUTES SEC 102I \ \J 1.235. / t 137.I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE RECEIVED AND HAD THE OPPORTUNITY. TO REVIEW THE ARBITRATION DISCLOSURE AND 13a RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT..X -\ 139.SELLER(S) 14a SELLER(S) \ . _i_ BUYER(S) \ BUYER(S)___ r / ilosing. eementtor lyment into speciai abie in the hich is not npitvement ol pending aayment of rayment on jch special _____this all earnest I closing,to /V // /A I lAgen*) (Agent) (uxnp^ NMwe) i / ( / Represents Repres^ts V V.-• 144.THIS NOTICE DOES NOT SATISFY MINNESOTA STATUTORY AGENCY DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS. 145.I, the cwner of the property, accept this agreement and authorize 14a the listing broker to withdraw said property from the market, 147.unless Instructed otherwise in writing. I agree to purchase the property for the price and on the terms and conditions set forth above. / ‘y i I (Sa'to 9 Signaru-a)iDttf) )7 . /7W//. (Sa'ir 1 Prir»o (Socia) Sacu'^ Nur^bgr) _ X '//yK-. (Marntt SwutJ ) 7 C. (4 / ) (Saiitf • Sion«u?«)(Om) J" f 00 ' 1 h (Salto 1 PfimaO Nama) //;• W'('(. 2^1 y (Buyv '• S^n^uff) Nlfc^i% PrVWBd NW) (Soctai S«cunty NumDoO (OM) (Mamil Stitvja) (6u^ • SignBlurB)(OiH) (Buy«r • PfVM Narnt) (Social Sacjrr**^ Numogr^ 154.FINAL acceptance date 155 155 MN:PA4 (8^3) (M«fiw Sutui)(Sodtl Sscuny Number)(MtrM SWvNl THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS. IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE, CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL. t t ^ I: « I I i < ■ t • ■ ^ I ; ( M,< . T ' I » •II if- .t: :«7xWt¥fc»:ri (TiTi^ ti ■I • r:¥i^#Tnri^ •:I| •m*Am •:•‘CT;7« ■ •ifri .1 1 si LiiM«l*J:TIilii:« S'. ■ • tli»7it Wti > I : dil7 LtlM» •.^-T |T |T.»:Tr»7ri77'^»r illiVxMt:»xSTTiTIiI#»; S71 r iirrryTtAiri ivTi 1 rr #:fi :• IT* olffis-irtriwy*: [ililGilKyii [•■•IflliliSr;! sryy:js.«imti#TriT*i e.lixtr-tnyrir#: r«B C£sfl^ilSTil(TiTt1 L’X ilU][tHWWicW*! mn$] r SECOHD ~ fptiTc AMFNnMF'MX cntcrcti into on th® !^dsy ofraiS AMENDMENT,DENNISON SHAW, JR. nMn TAN^SHAW- -Fm^band and wife (hereinafter referred to as rHFRYD D CARTER husband a.»d wife (h«.. ^iinafter referred to »s“^L?ra"7r O.KEIL AND SALLY B. KEIL, husband and wife (heSiMfterreferred to as "KEIL”); ORVILLE E. FISHER, JR aS^ALE^DM S:FISHER, husband and wife (hereinafter «7er«d to « Wisher") ; Donald e. gforge ^d m^ene m. CFORGE husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as ••GEORGE"); CORNELIA D. KLITZKE ZL s.l^SN's““HLI?'husbanranS wiffcheriinaf^r re- “rred'^o ff^S^Ll"); JoAnL. MCCOY AND CHARLENE M MCCOY, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as MCCOY ). RECITALS A. on September 21, 1978, Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("Declaration") were executed re stricting the title to Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, Block 1, and Outlot B, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Which declaration was filed for record in the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on September 27, 1978, as Document No. 1295753; and filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder on September 29, 1978, as Document No. 4416070. B.Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition was replatted into Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition by P^at dated May 17, 1979, and fil^H for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of itles on May 31, 1979. y C.Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Stielows Addition, were replatted into Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Klitzka Addition by^ plat recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder on October 30, 1980, and recorded with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on October 29, 1980. D.The First Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, conditions and Restrictions ("First Amendment") made by all the mortgagees of the original Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, Stielows Addition and at least six of eight owners of sai Lots was made on June 26, 1981, and filed for record in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on November 6, 1981, as Document No. 1446866. E.On the date hereof all the Owners and all the Mort gagees of record of the original Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, V Stielows Addition, including Lots 1 and 2, BxOcX 1, Stielows Second Addition and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Klitske Addition, are as follows: 1.Lot 1, Blo?k 1, Stielows Second Addition (for merly part of Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition) is owned by F. Denniscn Shaw, Jr. and Janet Shaw, hus band and wife with mortgages of record in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America; IJorwest Mortgage, Inc.; and Norwest Bank Minnesota, H.A. 2.Lot 2, flock 1, Stielows Second Addition (for merly part of Lot 1, Block 1, Stielows Addition) is owned by Carl O. Keil and Sally B. Keil, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Citibank, N.A., as Trustee under that certain pooling and servicing agreement dated as of December 1,^ 1993, for Multi-Class Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate Series 1993-0 Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation; and Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 3.Lot 2, Block 1. Stielows Addition is owned oy Orville E. Fisher, Jr. and Alexandra G. Fisher, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of FBS Mortgage Corporation and First Bank National Asso ciation . 4.Lot 3, Block 1, Stielows Addition Is owned by Donald E. George and Marlene M. George, husband and wife with mortgages in favor of Norwest Mortgage, Inc. and Investors Savings Bank FSB. 5. Lot 1, Block 1, Klitzke Addition is owned by Cornelia D. Klitzke and Loren J. Klitzke, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. and GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania. 6.Lot 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition is owned by James T. Hale and Sharon S. Hale, husband and wife, with mortgages in favor of Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. and First Minnesota Savings Bank, FSB. 7.Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by John L. McCoy and Charlene M. McCoy, husband and wife. 8.Lot 7, Block 1, Stielows Addition is owned by Albin J. Nelson and Susan K. Nelson, husband and wife with mortgages in favor of First Bank St. Paul; NoxTwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.; and Washtenaw Mortgage Corporation. 9 tot 8, Block 1, Stielows Addition is ownod oy oiv T Carter and Cheryl D. carter, husband and with mortgages in favor of Residential Fund ing Corporation and Noruest Bank Minnesota, N.A. F It is the intention of the parties hereto to amend the Deol^raiion and First Amendment with regard to resubdividing of said Lots# MOW THEREFORE in consideration of the covenants and Addition, Klitzke Addition, with the consent of tSf ho!Serl'ofaf ^ir^gages upon all Lots in Stielows second Addition and Klitzke Addition. »"d Lots 2^«; 8, all in Block 1, Stielows Addition, agree as folio I. 1(a) and substituting therefore the following. Non-exclusive and appurtenant easements are hereby granted and established in fa vor of each Lot or subdivision of a Lot which has access to Outlet B, Stielows Addition (also known as Oxford Road) and the Owners thereof; as follows; a)Ingress and Eoress An easement for roadway purposes upon that part of the Property dei’ ibed as Outlot B, Stielows Additic.i and which easement is outlined in red crosshatching^ on Exhibit A, attached to the original Declaration. II.The Declaration and First Amendment are hepby amended by adding to Article IV, paragraph 1 the following: In the event subdxvision of a Lot, as approved hereunder^ results in more than nine (9) lots with access to Outlot B, Stielows Addition, then owners of all resulting lots with such access shall share egually m said costs along with the Owners of the other Lots with access to said Outlot B.If said subdivision I y Shall have no liability for said costs. TTT The Declaration and the First ^endnent are h«eby amended by adding to Article V, para- graph 3 the followings In the event more than nine (9) lots result from the subdivision of any lot as allowed hereunder, then such shorter setback shall be approved by seven (7) Owners. TV The Declaration and the First Amendment are hereby amended by deleting Article V para graph 6 and substituting therefore the follow ing; (6)nivision of Lots.Ho resubdi vision of a Lot shall be allowed without amendment of this^ Declara tion, except that subdivision of Lot 6, Block 1, Stielows Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, Klitzke Addition into four resulting lots, none of which shall be less than two (2) acres in area, is hereby approved. In any case no future subdivision shall be allowed which results in a lot of less than two (2) acres. After the lot division approved herein, there will be ten lots with access to Outlet B, Stielows Addi tion (also known as Oxford Road), and the Owner of each lot with such access shall share equally in the maintenance and repair costs set forth in Article IV herein. V The Declaration and The First Amendment are hereby amended by adding to Article V the fol lowing: (7)Rental. In the event there are two living units on any Lot (or a lot resulting from an allowed subdi vision of a Lot), such second living unit shall not be rented separately from the main living unit. An owner shall not be restricted from renting r an entire lot and the living unit thereon. VI.The Declaration and the First Amendment are hereby amended by adding to Article VI, para graph 2 the following: In the event more than nine (9) lots result from the subdivision of any Lot as allowed hereunder, then such amendment shall be agreed to by seven (7J Owners and all Mortgagees of record. ► VII.Except as otherwise amended herein, the Decla ration of Covenants, Conditions and Rastric- tions and the First Amendment to the Declara tion of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions referred to above shall remain in full force and effect. VIII.The parties hereto do hereby consent that in the event any party endeavors to bring an ac tion for the addition of the original Declara tion, the First Amendment or this Second Amendment to the body of any certificate of title evidencing ownership of any of the lots restricted by the Declaration, the parties hereto consent to such addition to the body of any such certificate of title, and waive all rights to notice of commencement of a proceed ing subsequent to the initial registration of land brought to accomplish such addition and to the entry of an appropriate order of the court with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year fxrst above written. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) /^/ituZ /k Lcl<I^S Cheryl^D. Carter * OoQ-O. carl. O. Keii S.\\rs>.-v4 sally ~B. Keil, ^ oryilK^^E. Fifehe^^'Jr^ Alexandra G. 7/ George /IMaVlene M. George ____________ ___ Cornelia D. Klitzxe^ -7^y ■' 1 /.'' . ‘^Ldren J. KlitzKeyy ^ T' '9<Z"'( t ^ ^ ^ •* Jan\fes T. Hale Vi Sharon S. Hale JohfiTL. Mc(7oy Charlene M. McCoy The foregoing instrument was acknowledged day of ___'Dennison Shaw, Jr. and Janet Shaw, husband and wife. Notary Public f < i I request for council action DATE: June 30, 1995 ITEM NO.:r Department Approval: Nane Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section Zoninii Item Description: #2025 Michael Plank, di 15/4147 Watenown Road - Preliminar>' Subdivision of Replat of Lots 2 and 3 of Maple Place Plat - Resolution Brief Review of Application Review Exhibits D-1 and 2, the original plat of Maple Place was approved in 1983 and involved the plat of three lots. The current division involves Lots 2 and 3 ot that plat. In 1993, applicant proposed a lot line rearrangement of Lots 2 and 3, review Exhibit D-2, and received an approval recommendation from the Planning Commission but w?s never completed. Since the Planning Commission ’s 1993 approval, the back lot/front lot ordinance was passed and now proposed Lot 2 would have to be increased to 7.5 acres. The back lot ordinance requires 150% of the area for the RR-IA zoning district (5 acre minimum). During a lengthy sketch plan review with the Planning Commission at their May meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that applicant replat Lots 2 and 3 and now designate a private road outlet. Lot 2 would no longer be considered a back lot as it would be served by a private road. Platting the roau outlot w ith the current lot line rearrangement ensures applicant of three residential units with 19+ acres (3.61 acres wet). Refer to Exhibit G. Proposed Lot 2 meets the 5 acres of dry land. Lot 1 at 10.3 acres would have adequate dry buildable land for a future division. Applicant was further advised at the sketch plan review that the northern lot of that future division would have to be served by the road outlot to the east and that developer would also be responsible for installing -» private road. At the public hearing for the preliminary subdivision application, applicant asked that Planning Commission amend their original directive and asked that the condition ot approval only asic that access to the properties and required upgrade of road be subject to current City standards at the time of the future subdivision. Planning Commission had no problem with amending their original directive. Applicant will proceed with the vacation of the drainage and utilities that intersect proposed Lot 1, refer to Exhibit D-1. A public hearing has been scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting in July. The application also involves the granting of a width variance to proposed Lot 2 as lot only measures 200’ at the 100’ setback. Planning Commission members felt that this type of width variance was consistent when lots abut a cul-de-sac. I Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 June 30, 1995 Zoning File #2025 _____ The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the plat ot a lot line reanangnuem of Lots 2 and 3 of the Maple Place plat, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant/subdivider is placed on notice that at some time m the future if Lot 1 is further subdivided that access to the most northern of the lots and upgrade of existing road to serve three units v^ould be subject to the standards of the City at that time. 2. 3. Granting of a road and utility easement to the City over Outlot A. Dedication of .95 acres of additional protected wetland located within proposed Lot 1. 4.Outlot A be reuined in joint or common ownership with Lot 1 and that subdivider is responsible for creating easements in favor of Lot 2 over Outlot A. Applicant should also address the responsibility of Lot 2 for maintenance and upkeep of drive. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELEMLNARY APPROVAL OF A REPLAT OF LOTS 2 AND 3, MAPLE PLACE -FILE NO. 2025 WHEREAS, Michael R. Plank. May 22, 1995, tiled a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a lot line rearrangement of residential property legally described as: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. and Outlet A. Maple Place (hereinafter -the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19, 1995 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 10, 1995, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of a replat of a lot line rearrangement, noting the following fmdings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IA, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 5 acres of drj' lands, 2 acres of which must be contiguous within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 19.34 acres of which 3.61 acres is wetland. Each proposed lot exceeds the 5 acre minimum lot area requirement: Lot 1 Total area = 13.18 acres, 10.63 dry contiguous acres Lot 2 Total area = 6.16 acres, 5.1 dry contiguous acres 3.In 1988. Lot 2 was tested for a principal and an alternate septic site at the time of new construction. Both sites have been approved by the City. As proposed Lot 1 has over 10 dry acres, septic testing has not been required. Pace 1 of 4 1 4.There is 10 acres of dry contiguous lands available for future subdivision of Lot 1 based on current code standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of a lot line rearrangement of Lots 2 and 3. Maple Place, per the survey dated January 13, 1993 by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg. Inc., subject to the following conditions; 1.Subdivider and future owners are placed on notice that a» some lime in the fumre if Lot 1 is further subdivided that issues of legal access and the required upgrade of the existing driveway to a private road will be subject to the City standards in effect at the time of the fumre subdivision. (40 • Granting of a road and utility easement over Outlot A to the City. 3.Dedication of .95 acres of additional protected wetlands located within proposed Lot 1. 4.Outlot A to be retained in joint or common ownership with Lot 1 and that subdivider shall be responsible for creating easements and covenants in favor of Lot 2 over Outlot A. Covenants shall govern Lot 2*s responsibility for the share in maintenance and upkeep of roadway while Lot 2 is serv'ed by single access driveway and at the time of the fumre division. The following list of final submittals must be ‘ ubmitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month; 1.Record plat ^.awin»,' in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1 * 200 . Drawing to include; A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated January 13, 1993. B.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 5 ’ wide on each side of the newly defined internal property line. Page 2 of 4 I C Dedication of new wetland area located within proposed Lot 1 to be designated as drainage easements on the plat. D.Designation of a road outlot shown as Outlot A on the preliminary plat referenced above. 2.Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide cenified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.Signed and executed Conservation and Flowage Easement over the newly defined wetland designated as a drainage easement within Lot 1 (copies of the City ’s Conservation and Flowage Easement may be obtained at the City offices). D.Signed and executed road and utility easement over the private road outlot (copies may be obtained at the City oftices). E.Subdivider may wish to include easements/covenant in favor of Lot 2 involving use of Outlot A, road outlot, and need to maintain current driveway as set forth in Condition #4 above. 3.Fees to be paid: Total due: $200.00 for the legal review and filing fees of subdivision and additional required documents. Page 3 of 4 Adopted by the City CouncU of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of hdy, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged betore me on this 10th day of July, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mavor & City clerk of the Ci^ of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 To; From: Date: Subject: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 7, 1995 #2025 Michael Plank, 4115/4147 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Ueplat of Lot Line Rearrangement (subdivision also involves creation of private road outlot) - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances W [t 1. 2. 3. Chapter 11 - Class II Subdivision. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IA lot standards. Section 10.02, Definition 43 (A) - Lot width measured at the rear of the required front yard. Lot 2 Required Proposed Variance 300’ 200’ 100’ or 33.3% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners’ List C - Plat Map Dl-2 Maple Place Plat Approved 1988, 1993 Lot Line Rearrangement E - Tested Septic Sites for Lot 2 F - Planning Commission Minutes 5/15/95 G - Preliminary Plan Description of Request Per the directives of the Planning Commission at the sketch plan review, ba.sed on current code, applicant was advised that an original lot line rearrangement presented to the City in 1993 wr».fid now be considered, based on current cr-.’.i, .. ' ack lot configuration. Proposed Lot 2 v.ouid have to meet 150% of the area and w-Ju srmdards. As directed, application now proposes a lot line rearrangement with a road oullut. Lot 2 is not a back lot and meets the dry area requirement of 5.1 acres. Zoning File #2025 June 7, 1995 Page 2 Review Exhibit E, septic testing completed in 1988 at the tune of the Maple Place plat confirms alternate site. The current system serving the residence is conforming. The City would not require additional septic testing for the 13.1 acre lot. The existing residence has a conforming system. Restatement of Issues Raised During the Sketch Plan Review 1 Road outlet shall be legally combined with Lot 1 . Applicant/subdivider shall create and easement in favor of Lot 2 over road Outlet A. Applicant would also grant a road and utility easement to the City over Outlet A. 2.Planning Commission would recommend approval of the lot width variance for Lot 2 at the south end of the cul-de-sac finding this was consistent for lots adjacent to cul-de-sac areas in subdivisions. 3 Review Exhibit G, the darkened area on the preliminary plan denotes additional wetland areas to be designated as a protected area consisting of approximately .95 acres. Note this will not separate or divide dry lands within Lot 1. 4.Members placed applicant on notice that if Lot 1 was subdivided in the future that the northern lot would be required to access off Outlot A, the road outlot, and subdivider would be required to construct road to current City standards. Staff recommends approval of the replat of a lot line rearrangement of the properties located at 4115/4147 Watenown Road involving the creation of a road outlot and approves a lot width variance for Lot 2 at 100 ’ or 33.3% based on the finding that all other standards ot the RR-1 A zotung distric* and subdivision regulations have been satisfied. Approval is based on the following conditions; 1 Applicant/subdivider is placed on notice that at some time in the future if Lot 1 is further subdivided that the most northern lot with residence will be required to access to the east at Outlot A. The subdivider/applicant shall also be responsible for construction of a road to the current City standards. 3. 4. Dedication of a road and utility easement over Outlot A. Dedication of .95 acres of additional protected wetlands located within proposed Lot 1. It is recommene’ed that Outlot A be retained in Joint or common ownership with Lot 1 and that subdivider is responsible for creating easements in favor of Lot 2 over Outlot A. b: V; •;<^ F ckW^O - sCBDtVlSION APPLICATION 1^' PROPERTY LOCATION .^ Siie address j;;p;;w Id'eatlltouon Number (PID) l~ " ^(jg?f PleSe cbeck one - Propeny abstract or _J<-‘ Attach legal description to application. applicant , Name \\A\/"]k(u. ^^ Address '^n’l jN. Cirv Phone (home).^7^ Zip^aSi^ Ph'^ne (work) 0^^'^'ER (if different than applicant) Name Address Citv Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other-(specify)_______ Lt1^_ i 1 « rtw wu .** •-r / »• • V * m \ ■■-.*•. .4 •-•u* •4 ‘ -V y PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes xA , Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) (i_ ) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number oFBuilding Sites ____1.-----Existing Units _ New Umts Total Units o Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per Acres X Sq. Ft. Diy Buildable Und Residential Other (specify)_________ MINEVa<’M MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR K^ Pavmeni of fees (refer to 'applicatioo fees’ listed belo . 2/^^Completed application form. CT^ Preluninaty plat infonaanon on Ccnificate . obtain tliis list from Hennepin County- Depanmeat of Finance ^ Cenified Property Owners List of owners wuhm a50 (you mus ^ , V ,—^ A-603 Govt. Center 348-3271).persons you wish liotmcd^inms ^pn^ou. GZ)as an addendum to this application, please attach a separate ^_______ Zooixig Official ’s _________________________________________ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED *^0*^ if appicable). 1.Payment of fees (refer to Prelimmary Subcivision .Approv^ resoiutio f 2.Signed Certificate of Sur%ey or mylar copies 01 formal plat. 3.Title opinion. 4.Easements, coveaams. etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit.___________ Zoning Official ’s Signarore ----------------------------------------------------■ I application FEES (Zoning .administrator to check [XI those v^mch apply) ‘.... ^ nr s:<».oo Subdivision ot a Lot Line Subdivision Application ‘ 00/lot (Class III So. all non-residential)Preliminary Subdivision Apphcation^Sai™ a-.w i Final Plat Application (Class III) S175.00 'Legal Review and Filing: ^ __ Subdivision only S75.00 Totals iUDQlvision uiuv j.j.ww c-.nn nn Subdivision w/easemen:s and covenants mm. S.*.CO. Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) Lesal and Engineering Review Fees (as meurred) ^ ^__ . ^ j IT Annlimfinr ■ ZZt °o'f fS ctf"v,!r;;pl,c.,oS SIOO.>» ,N o fro. origina. appUc.on) .;<ii rmnrnvMnent Fees: _______ n.cacwdi vit t — ^'’TrojTsS°P^«e*RMdi S600.00 4- S.50/lineal ft.; --------- Proposed Public Roads S900.00 -K S.50/lineal ft.; lin. ft. X .50 = S lin. ft. X .50 » S. . S-9^ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Mam Extension S250 00 + S-5/stub Proposed Watermain E.xtension S250.00 + S25/stub oS'Sy ”er l;r/MST.l“er(3pyi'Sle To rural subdivision appltations) S50.00/new lot proposed for on-site x--------new lots ir-____.-w f V/. V/v/» r * c.Fle.\ible .Application Fees/XIisc. Fees Variance S200.00 3?” Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision S75.00 ■----- PRD Application with Subdivision S30.00/Dwellmg Umi_________ PRD AppllCiti^’u WIL.X ......................................... ^ '»Totssr ss established by ordinance.---------------------------------------------- Applicant's Signamre Owner's Signature . i\(^y I.V^/cM Date •« Owner’s Signature « i r4[iL^—r -------------------/ / ^^^ DHnnine Commission r nn« have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commssion meeting^ P ^^5 Planning Applicant must Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review me g meetings arc ,s unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please moke arrangements to have an fguTS m vourTS!= dod to adv.se dt. Bmldiog i Zoomg Office of dtis ebaoge prior lo the meenog. RUN BATE 05/17/«B•' RATCfl 502 RfioR AooR* if! OMCR HNC ifTAXPAYER nahe /ador i a ' * .i - . A NffMPiN eeuKTY pm^iwrf iwmwnm systchPROPERTY QHNERS UST sa Sl-lia*2S 43 0014 00145 CRXSTOfORX CZR U P i i KM4PP MZLLXAH F I EVELYN KNAPP 4300 aAYSXDE RO lUPLE PLAIN rtl 55359 i- t h\ :n •i:y' I* PROP AOOR nahe TAXPAYER ' i I 'NAHE/ADDR SO S1-118-2S 44 0002 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSZGNED STATE OF Hirt4 STATE OF MINN IDNRI lUXE LINE TRAIL) •S>'» ■rj- ' • . .; PROP ADDR ONNER NAME ^TAXPAYER « NAHE/AOOR i-^' •» • ;» •. • ‘ Jc*V*‘ .. t *•* i '. TOTAL PATCH 502 00024 .ilA- • ^ *1 ■. ’ ^ • *■ I * f -« * i ;i ' i •.•W • 4in • •• V .r V •. 3a 31-lia-23 43 0015 00030 ADORES UNASIOCD N F A E KNAPP HXLLXAH F A EVELYN KHAPP . 4300 OAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAXN MN 55359. . I 30 31-110-23 44 0003 00030 ADDRESS UNASIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND ^ FOR SALE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY ONNER ONLY <« \ li-^,I f .i' H . •f REPORT NO.PAGE PI4354015 30 31-116-23 44 0001 00038 ADORES (JNASSK^D STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN IDNR) I LUCE LINE TRAIL) 30 31-118-23 44 0004 00050 CRISTOFORI CIR KENDRICK D MELROSE KENDRICK B MELROSE 50 CRISTOFORI CIR MAPLE PLATN MN 55359 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFOfmATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AhK) BELIEF. DATE by /IM BMu> Y 4‘ *r TITV -RUN RATE os/n/n■'Hf-'■■ . •'MTCN Mt>:v';iMOR AooRi^lirOMNER NAME'i?!'TAXPAYERNAK/AODR;V'; %-.v. i :.,-. i Hi' H“!' -xfi ? j‘;**.’rrop r»; 4 AMR OltCR NAME Li TAXRAYER >[ /, NAIC/AOM .■■? tv-i S'i ■p-h 'i..' 1•'N: , -♦<.• PMN^ ADM OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR r i’.■ PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR * %'•*- V’»v, ,i» T » ‘ ‘ PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR . ! PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER • NAHE/ADDR •■‘A- K ' 1 M 31-lM-tS IS 001204220NATERTOHN ROR AND J HYATTRQDERT J HYATT4220 NATERTCPtl ROADHAPU PLAIN MN 55S5^ Sa SI-118-2S 41 0001 04040 NATERTCPtI RO T R A C H SMIEJA THOMAS R/CHRXSTXNE M SMIEJA 4040 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PUIN MN 55S59 sa S1-118-2S 41 0005 04005 NATERTOHN RD C F DALE I G L PAULSON CHRISTOPHER F DALE GERX L PAULSON 4005 NATERTOHN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 SO Sl-lia-23 42 0001 04245.CHIPPEHA LA R L SORENSEN ETAL ROBERT L SORENSEN 4245 CHIPPEHA LANE MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 sa Sl-lia-23 42 0005 0003a ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HINNIFRED M BRYANT HINNIFRED H BRYANT C/0 MERLE STILES laOl LAKEVIEH TER LONG LAKE MN 55356 HETflEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEMPROPERTY OHNERS LISTSO Sl-lia*2S 13 001504225 NATERTOm ROJAMES R PADDONJAMES R PADDON4225 HATERTOItl RDMAPLE PUIN MN 55359 sa 31-118-23 41 0003 04045 HATERT0lt4 RD D S I 0 S KELLEraERGER DANA A GREGORY KELLENBERl^R 4045 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN /• 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0008 04145 NATERTOHN RO M R A M E PLANK SALLY PLANK 327 NORTH CARRINGTON BUFFALO^ ,82834 38 31-118-23 42 0002 04265 CHIPPEHA LA T J A K L MCCAFFREY THOMAS J MCCAFFREY 4265 CHIPPEHA LA MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 42 0006 00038.ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN CDNR I I LUCE LINE TRAIL) REPORT NO. PI435401PAGE 438 31-118-23 14 000704100NATERTOHN RDFRANK KOKESH ET ALFRANK KOKESH4100 NATERTOHN ROMAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0004 04105 NATERTOHN RD D GIGUERE A A GIGUERE PAMMALEE MARIE SAHCHUK 4105 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0011 04115 NATERT0)a4 RD MICHAEL R I MARY E PLANK MICHAEL PLANK 327 NORTH CARRINGTON BUFFALOVll^ 62834 38 31-118-23 42 0003 04355 CHIPPCNA LA FREDERICK E SHEMANEK JR ETAL FRED E SHEMANEK RT 2 BOX 16 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 42 0012 04220 CHIPPEHA LA PAMELA GAIL ANDERSON PAMELA G ANDERSON 4220 CHIPPEHA LANE MAPLE PLAINS MN 55359 \ 38 31-118-23 42 0015 38 31-118-23 43 0002 38 31-118-23 43 0011 04360 CHIPPEHA LA 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 00145 TURNHAM RD # L E MARTINEAU/J M MARTINEAU STATE OF MINN BEAL SAVINGS BANC LARRY E 1 JEAN M MARTINEAU STATE OF MINN (DNR)>■DAVID A DETERS • 4360 CHIPPEHA LA (LUCE LINE TRAIL)145 TURNHAM RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 •l MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 i ,• • •V f*'. 4 1 * % *■-‘v’•> PLE PLACE lUH iiiii »t •/• 9t ‘ 4>tf tlS4'J«C'»r.--;r,.r>, /v • I. *?«•<-W •■•»*« - “*• |\ OUT LOT ,A //A#fi I f » .•-»» I ’«?»«r Vi l«M •«!» 01 **tt II 1 myrn^mM^m ••« «•<«#«••• ( •«••• IsM ••! 0m4 ...... ♦••Mfc •» f««| Mll«l 0i S«(fl»a II »* V I ,m I tcUatiaa •« »*l..ia *• I .* •*••II $•««• •• ft l/« MC •/« «l t«( V V I’'!:"'! it -f y■'^^ "-t # WMail♦*«.!». al ^Hi«aw taOlM •I n U2. t*o IHI ••••Of Oi - .*••*•*••»• »•«•*« af !•(• Halt ai «•«•••> •! i«(ilaa || I ®|*fai|l.*af tMtkaUal ," »•••••••'•••*••»•*»•«•♦, a II .... .. .*---I ■ I I ■■ .........................V :. ;.v.. :v;..vv; :-: ; :v-. SJ /: 'll' *'•» > • •I •»«••> •»••••• •! laiilaa |i • mil ,^oo f- i t * .1 I ('"'/X/ // m (/I.'/; A' ;V/,,'■Hi U , Vu 'I /i I / I I 1 / j * : ^ 1>'W,' > •'• '' 1 7 .-I \ t I « I I « \ -Vi V> \ V3 \ ' « ., t \ X ^ \V V ^ I \ V \ \ \ N t MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 15. 1995 (#12 - #2019 Leisel Cox - Continued) Mabusth informed the members that the application was for a conditional use permit for a Class 1 restaurant in the Overson Building. The Keaveny property is to the immediate east of this property. Mr. Keaveny was present and still owns that building. Mabusth showed the survey of the building and the parking, w’hich has 28 stalls. Mr. Keaveny confirmed that there was no shared docking or parking areas. Cook said the parking will still be workable after improvements on CoRd 15 is completed. Nolan questioned if it was appropriate to ask for a cenain number of parking stalls. Mabusth did not believe this was necessary, noting there was never a parking problem at this propeny. The site plans call for a coffee shop type restaurant serving espressos, sandwiches, and soups. Peterson said the CUP application is consistent with the use. Simth moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #2019 for a conditional use permit to include the three recommendations. Aves 5, Navs 0. Mabusth added a third condition to the application. There is now one bathroom. Separate bathrooms must be provided for men and women. (#13) SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - #1800 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115 WATERTOWN ROAD - REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL DIRECTION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION Michael Plank was present. Gaflfron reported that approval had been originally given in February of 1993; but through an apparent miscommunication, final exhibits were never submitted by the applicant. Consequently, the applicant never went before the Council and expired in February of 1994. The backlot ordinance was adopted since the original approval, and anv new subdivisions after January of 1994 need to meet the current standards. An example of how that affects this application is the requirement for 150^0 of the lot area and width. Gaffron stated that at this time, this is a sketch plan review and requires no formal vote. In way of background, prior to 1988 this property wa.s a 25 acre parcel. In 1988, it was subdivided into three lots and a 30' width access outlot. Approval was given for the shared use of tlie driveway outlot for the new house on Lot 3 and a second lot which might be split from it in the future. In 1993, preliminary approval was given to rearrange the boundary between Lots 2 and 3, leaving 6.2 acres with the house on Lot 3 and 13.6*” acres with the house on Lot 2. Plank then would have the ability to seU the house on Lot 3 but maLitain control of the outlot and enough acreage for a possible split in the future. ^tlT’•Tr. ^nriNO planning CONMSSION NDNUTES OTTffi ON^tAY 15. >995 Oa®onno«a.ha.;.S,affs OnExHbUC. proposed t^'^he "here they would abut the ou.lo ^ and area requirement. There wou sac.there could be changes in the o-i~«-“^ Does the road have to be budi if h'*house on Lot ’.) becomes the third —““.,'r "S.'S « S™“«" ^ ',sriT “S. .”■ >^“%,rr r.;S,tr; “EtS- give up a possible 1 . -The Applicant is looking for u h-„d.u,st e^lained what - .^'''^nrersss^ssss^- ( ..•I w*.v>Avvyi^v^ rjL-^-u\i.\ij.NU V^UAiiV115:)iUiSNffiETING HELD ON \UY 15, 1995(#13 - #1800 Michael Plank - Continued)Plank asked if approval could be given under the 1993 standards. Lindquist said thestandards of today need to be upheld.Peterson asked for Plank's opinion on a road with a cul-de-sac. Peterson said the Planning Commission would probably look favorably on giving a width variance in this circumsunce. Plank said a road would take more space and questioned wh,at would happen if changes were to be made to Watenowm Road. • Nolan said the approval could stipulate what would trigger a change if the drive were to come off of Watertown Road. Referring to Exhibit D-6, Peterson said if lot Y (the future 3rd lot) has a home with it, then a road would be needed. Prior to this, the road would only be dedicated. Plank would maintain control of lots X and Y and road postponed. If X or Y were to be built on, the road would be constructed. Lot X might need access off a cmWe-sac if Watenown Road were improved or its status upgraded to a level where limiting individual driveway access onto it is critical. Gafiron questioned w hether the City could require the Applicant to close their drive from Watertown Road under the current lot line rearrangement application. Plank ask why he would want to do this. Commissioners responded that when applicam's desire a change in their properties, this is the time for leverage in gaining solutions to future "what-if ' questions. Lindquist said an easement covenant would be required as a deed restriction on the sale of lot X and development of lot Y. The width variance would be a non-issue. Other commissioners agreed. Lindquist asked if the City could require Lot X to access off a cul-de-sac in the future. Gaffron said if Lot I (X/Y) were divided, the City could then change the access to a road and the road could be built for a level of 3 users. Plank asked if this issue could be addressed at that future time. The commissioners informed him that it was being addressed now and was consistent with a 3-lot division. Gaffron said the 1988 resolution which allowed lot line to happen, mcluded a statement that the developer could use the outlet to serve lot 3 and a future lot split from it (Y and Z). Lindquist and Berg said yes, but the code has changed, and that split never occurred. Plank was reminded that if lot 2 were sold now, there would likely not be enough land to have another lot. Nolan commented that future commissions and councils might v-ievv the property differently and Watenown Road might not be upgraded. Any future changes would be dead ed on at time of future applications, but, the time to gain the easement is .now. VI ■% u li i/** «<!#•✓ 44.n HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOA ro,r,,.j „ o,j ~f~C> <®>"s- U(j C o-T^-eQ *<r-025 IK3ICSLD B i WAISK'N OAIl IH_*<RiriR)N ' tWAVXN »V C offin & gronberg . inc . Coihiiltiiiji Euxhhvn, Ltwii Snmi/ors, Site Planners 482 Tamarack Aven ue • Look Uke, MN 55356 612-473-4141 I hrrdn uflifv lh*i| this vuiu*» t\as prcp.m’il bv me or under m\ dirwl ^upi’r- \ iMon. .md lh.>i I .im j duU re);isu-ri\l Civil tn>;im.vr ,md l^nd Survw or under Ibe bu^ i»l tile Sl.ite ol MmiteM'lii Mark S (.nmK‘1}; NtiimeM»la I neiiM* NuniKf 127^^ V - ? •* 5' 4 V ,11* REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ w l 10 1995 DATE; }J^WO£ORONO ITEM NO.:7 Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Tide Building A Zoning Administraior Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zonine Item Descriptiio: #2029 William F. Smith. 2580 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision Resolution Brief Description of Request For more detail on this rather complex review, staff would encourage your reviewing the enclosed staff memo dated June 9, 1995. The current subdivision involves the division of Lot 1, Beau Marais plat approved in 1986. Review Exhibits C & I. The resolution specifically references a future division of Lot 1 and the need to provide legal access for all three lots. The division as proposed, review Ex^bit I. based on current code would classify the divisron as a back lot/front lot configuration calling for 30’ wide driveway outlet to serve two lots within the division. The Planning Commission reviewed this subdivision as a sketch plan at their March meeting and advised applicant to seek an access for new lot (Lot 2) at Fox Run road to the immediate west of property Applk. ,:t was also advised of the pending workshop that was scheduled to revtew existing standards for driveways and private roads and that there may be less rMtnctive standards. Applicani has since been advised that it would not be the intention of the Planntng Commission to recommend less restrictive standards. Roads or driveways may be reclassified but with this change driveways may also be required to meet specific levels of improvement. Th- ''Ticultv for the current 1995 review is that Lot 2 ot the original Beau Marais plat is no loneer’itvcludcd as part of the current division. If legal access for all three lots is to ac^ V .ed. it must be via Lot 1 where extensive wetlands exist to the north, review Exhibit Review Exhibit Gl-4. all property owners served by Fox Run have written ih^ity they will not approve a curb cut onto Fox Run for new development. subdivision application proposes the continued use of the existing easement drive for all t^ee lots seekin- variances to the subdivision regulations. The proposed two lot division poses no other concerns as the lot meets the 2 acre dry contiguous requirement to the west of the intersecting private easement driveway. SP Testing has confirmed that there StsoL for an alternate and principal septic site. The existing curb cut at Fox Street has adequate sighting distance for the 40 mph roadway. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 July 3, 1995 Zoning FUe #2029 ________ 4. The Planning Commission was asked to consider four alternatives for access to the property. Review pages 3 and 4 of the enclosed staff memo. The alternatives are briefly reviewed as follows: 1.Use of existing easement drive to secure three residential units requiring possible upgrades in driveway (E.\hibit P). •y Private road with cul-de-sac involving extensive tree removals along eastern boundary and major filling of designated wetland (Exhibit N). The Council resolution of 1986 said all three lots must be served by a legal access. 3 Back lot/front lot with 30 ’ driveway outlot (Exhibit O). This option would satisfy the current subdivision code but only two lots can be served by this driveway. Existing Lot 2 of the Beau Marais plat would continue to be served by the existing drivewav that encroaches proposed Lot 2. This option would involve the careful placement of a driveway in order to minimize tree removal along the eastern boundary and a slight encroachment of a narrow portion of the weUand to allow an access drive to serve nonhem developed lot proposed Lot 1. Individual curb cut to serve proposed Lot 2. The City Engineer had reviewed the western portion of the lot to determine if there were any sighting problems and found none. This option appeared to be a contrivance to get around the requirements of the code and would be in complete conflict with the Comp Plan. 5.No acceptable access plan. The City may find that Lot I cannot be subdivided either because of the many variances to the subdivision regulations or the negative impact upon existing amenities and designated wetland if code or Resolution #2069 were to be enforced. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of Option 1 allowing for the third lot to be served by the existing driveway but have conditioned approval on the existing driveway being upgraded to the originally approved 12’ width in 1986. The existing driveway is now at 10 ’." In addition the drive was to be widened to an 18’ width Just beyond the new curb cut to serve new lot. The upgraded drive was to be designated an an outlot through proposed Lot 2. The Planning Commission recommends the granting of a variance to the subdivision rcgulatio^ that would have required a 30 ’ driveway outlot along the east boundary and also recommends that the directives of Resolution No. 2069 that granted approval of the Beau Marais subdivision be waived not requiring a private road with cul-de-sac. The enclosed resolution has ^en drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission ’s unanimous approval of the two lot subdivision. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 July 3. 1995 Zoning FUc #2029 ______ COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; To either deny, approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. ch FiTfT^ MW LtMCa MMililCC ^sfmm r -pii™ - ^ - i-^ 4 The existing easement driveway that intersects proposed Lot 2 will not violate Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) as there is 2.15 dry contiguous acres to the west of the easement driveway. 5 In the granting of approval of the Beau Marais plat in 1986 the City also granted variances that allowed the filling of designated wetlands for the installation of the driveway to serve the most northern lot or Lot 1 of the Beau Marais plat. 6 If a private road with cul-de-sac was installed along the east side of property to serve all three lots, a half acre of designated wetlands would be filled. This improvement would also result in the loss of several mature evergreen trees along the east side of the property. All three access drives leading from road would also encroach upon the designated wetland areas. 7 The current subdivision is defined as back lol/front lot subdivision requiring shared access via a 30 ’ driveway outlet. The driveway outlet along the east would be limited to only two users. Lot 2 of the original Beau Marais plat would continue to gain access via the existing easement drive. Construction of a drive would result in the loss of some of the mature evergreen trees planted along the east property line. There would be an encroachment of the required 26’ setback from the wetland. There would be additional encroachments of the designated wetland for the fumre drive to ser\e both lx)ts I and 2 of the current subdivision. 8.The Planning Commission found the creation ol two driveways within this property would have a negative impact upon the aesthetics and sensitive environment of this unique property. 9 The current owner of Lot 2, Beau Marais, has agreed to maintain the current looped driveway within their property to ser\e as a mmaround for emergency vehicles. 10.There is no record of problems reported by the former owners of Lots 1 and 2, Beau Marais or the current owners of l^t 2 in the use ot the current driveway nor has the City any record of an accident resulting at the intersection ot the private driveway and Fox Street. Pace 2 of 5 11.The granting of the variance to the subdivision regulations will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property. 12.The conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are unique to the property’ for which this variance is sought and are not applicable generally to other property in the City. 13.Because of the location of extensive designated wetlands that surround the dry buildable areas of this property- and mature plantings on the property, an unusual hardship to the land would result, if the letter of the code were to be followed as distinguished from an inconvenience or hardship to the subdivider. 14.It has been found that the strict enforcement of this chapter would result in an environmentally unsound development of land. 15.The variance will not in any manner vary from the provisions of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan which would approve three residential units being served by a driveway. 16.No variances are sought to the minimum lot requirements of the RR-IB Zoning District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD, that based upon either one or more of the above findings, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for William F. Smith at 2580 Fox Street per the survey dated 2-10-95, most revised date 5-25-95, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1,The existing driveway shall be upgraded from a 10 ’ gravel road to a 12 gravel road. The entrance portion of the drive shall be upgraded to an 18 width gravel road to a point just beyond new curb cut to serve residence on proposed Lot 2. Subdivider shall be responsible for installing appropriate identification signage identifying location of three residences served by driveway at intersection of drive with Fox Street. Residence shall continue to be addressed at Fox Street. Page 3 of 5 #.air?". 2.Subdivider shall create an ouUot within Lot 2 defining the driveway at a 14’ and 18’ width as described in Condition 1 above. 3.Subdivider shall be responsible for developing covenants for the maintenance and upkeep of driveway. month: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200*. Drawing to include. A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated 2-10-95. most revised date 5-25-95. B.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 5’ each side of new internal property lines. C.Naming of plat. 2.Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide ceiiified copies ot all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.E.xeculion of a Developer’s Agreement and posting of a letter of credit to be wiiiten to an amount equal to 150% of the costs ot required improvements. This includes the required upgrading of the gravel drivewav as set forth in Condition 1 above. Fees to be paid: Total due: $3?5 J!: Page 4 of 5 A.Final plat fee = $175.00 B.Legal review and filing fee = $200.00 C.*Park Dedication Fee Upon approval of preliminary plat, the subdivision shall be referred to the City Assessor to determine the fair market value of the property in its undeveloped state. You will be advised as soon as a fee has been determined. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this lOth day of July, 1995. ATTEST: I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv Public Page 5 of 5 To From: Date: Subject: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 9, 1995 #2029 William F. Smith, 2580 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision, Class HI Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB r- • r u The property is no longer located within shoreland area with the reclassification of the upper French Lake bisin. Total area = 10.23 acres. 3.07 wet, 7.16 dry Proposed Lot 1 = 6.07 total acres, 3.5 acres dry, 2.57 wet Lot 2 = 4.16 total acres, 3.66 acres dry, .5 wet Pertinent Ordinances Zoning Regulations 1 Section 10.03. Subdivision 6 (B) - Combination of separate parcels prohibited in meeting minimum acreage requirement. Note 2.15 dry contiguous acres exist to west of casement drive within lx)t 2. 2.Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards. 3.Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Minimum 26’ setback to be maintained from wetlands. Note applicant proposes use of existing easement drive to serve three properties proposing no further expansion in widlli of road. Subdivision Regulations 4.Section 11.03. Definition 24 - Lot area minimum. 5. 6. 7. Section 11.03 - Definition of back lot/front lot, review Exhibit L. There will be a need to address variances to this section as current easement road that encroaches existing Lot 2 of the Beau Marais plat cannot be replatted to designate through outlet at a 30 width. Ordinance also limits use of 30’ driveway outlet to two units. jp .Section ll.^^. Subdivision 10 (A) (1-7) - Necessary findings for granting variances. Section 11.33. Subdivision 42 - A typical section access serving three to six residential units call for private road. Comprehensive Plan Transportation Section CMP 7-17 - Private driveway may serve up to three residential units r Zoning File #2029 June 9, 1995 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - B - C - D-1-5 E-1-2 F-1-4 G-1-4 H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Application Property Owners ’ List Plat Map Applicant’s Addendum & Exhibits Applicant’s Utter & Plan for Access Dated 3/31/95 Planning Commission Minutes 3/20/95 Written Response of Fox Run Residences Septic Plan Resolution No. 2069 Drainage Plan Wetlands Back Loi/Front Lot Ordinance Access Plan Proposing Options Preferred by Applicant Plan for Private Road with Cul-de-sac as Required by Ordinance Driveway Outlet - Back Ub Front Lot Di\’ision Current Preliminaiy' Plan Current Proposal In recent meetings, the Planning Commission has been asked to address several variations on accesses for properties to be subdivided. Some such as the Cloutier and Plank involved cautionary advise for future divisions and others seeking variances to subdivision regulatior^ because of unique features and the impact on these amenities if the rer-ilations were to be satisfied In the case of the Beau Marais plat of 1986. the City cannot now ask for a replat so that a private road can be designed to meet the ordinance requirements of a three lot plat (as with Plank division). Shouldn ’t that issue have been addressed in 1986 before lot lines were defined? The current application involves a back lot/front lot division. How shall the City dea Uciie of access in the 1995 subdivision? Applicant proposes use of existing easement driveway to satisfy access needs ot back lot/front lot division. Easement driveway will serv-e three units requiring variances to subdivision regulations (Section 11.33. Subdivision 42 and Section 11.31. Subdivision 5)^ Section 11 33, Subdivision 42 calls for a private road when an access is to serve ihree to six residential units. Section 11.31. Subdivision 5 would require a 30 ’ wide driveway outlot with back lot/front lot division. Review Exhibits F-1 4, the Planning Commission was unanimous in recommending that access to the nevvlv created southern lot was preferred from Fox Run. Review Exhibits G-1-4 oropenv owners b.avc submitted written statements reaffirming their refusal to allow additional accesses onto private roadway. Review Exhibits D-1-5, applicant asks you to compare the Zoning File #2029 June 9, 1995 Page 3 cufrent proposal and variances granted to the Stronghold plat noting the similarity in physical characteristics of the property. Note in the Stronghold plat there was a 30 driveway outlot platted. Note also at the entrance a 50 ’ outlot was platted up to the driveway that served the existing residence. In the current proposal it is not possible to provide a continuous driveway outlot because Lot 2 of the Beau Marais plat is not included in this subdivision. The access standard for Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 would be met in division proposed in E.xhibit O. A 30 ’ outlot could be platted along the east side of propeny to the north lot line ot Lot 2. Beau Marais. Based on the directives of the ordinance, only Lots 1 and 2 could be served by this driveway. Lot 2, Beau Marais would continue to gain access via the existing easement drive. This option would have a major impact on the property resulting in the loss of the mature pines along the east side. It would also require a minor encroachment of the wetlands to allow for a connection to the existing drive to serve Lot 1. Review Exhibit N, the private road with cul-de-sac option. This plan would satisfy subdivision regulations. All lots would achieve access from the private road. There would even be a greater impact on the wetland with the installation of cul-de-sac. In 1986 a private road with cul-de-sac could have been located out of the wetlands. Review E.xhibit H, septic testing confirms that there is suitable and adequate area for both a principal and alternate septic site for proposed Lot 2. Lot 2 will meet all area and width requirements no matter what is the resolve ot the access issue. Access Plan Options 1.Use of existing easement drive to serve three residential units require approval of variances to both sections of subdivision regulations noted above. If this option is approved. Planning Commission may wish to recommend upgrading of the existing roadway. Applicant’s addendum notes that 4" of Class 5 gravel have been t __I ___ _nrivpfl :ind .should thc DOrtion withill the existing roaaway. AppiiLaiu ^ auuc:uuuiu umi -r ^------------- placed over existing drive. Should the roadway be paved and should the portion within proposed Lot 2, at least at the entrance, be upgraded with appropriate identification for ____Q.i.irMccf.*; tv* rh;ino4*f1 and a road name assigned to the proposed Lot Z, at least at me cniranec. uc wuii -------------- access to the three lots? Should addresses be changed and a road name assigned to the driveway? Should proposed Lot 1 be required to provide a turnaround in dry buildable area adjacent to residence? Should the driveway be expanded? Would you allow further encroachment of the wetland? 2.Private road with cul-de-sac (Exhibit N). This option would require approval of variances allowing for major encroachment of the designated wetland. The application would have to be reviewed by the Corps of Engineers, Watershed District and DNR. This plan would also result m the loss of several mature trees along the east side of propeny. All three lots would achieve access via this new roadway. m Zoning File #2029 June 9, 1995 Page 4 3 Back lot/front lot with 30 ’ driveway outlet (Exhibit O). This option would satisfy access ‘requirement for the division of this property. Only Lots 1 and 2 shall achieve access v,a the driveway. Lot 2, Beau Marais would retain access from the existing easement drive. There would be minor encroachment of the 26’ setback and a need to intersect drainageway at northern border of outlot to allow Lot 1 to use existing northern portion of driveway. Since our sketch plan review, this City Engineer, applicant and applicant ’s consultant have met on the site and walked the eastern portions of the property. A driveway along the east side could be installed and does not appear to be a major engineering feat. The narrowest pan of the wetland would have to be intersected by a driveway that wou d extend to Lot I’s driveway. If one just deals with a back lot configuration, this would appear to be a means of satisfying the ordinances but what of the aesthetic impact. 4.Individual curb cut to serve proposed Lot 2. Proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 of the Beau Marais plat would continue to use the easement drive. The City Engineer has reviewed the area to the west of the easement driveway and tmds no sighting problems with t e selection of a curb cut to the west side of Lot 2. This option appears to be a rather contrived means of circumventing the demands of the ordinance, and in many ways ts in direct opposition to the goals and intent of the Comp Plan. 5.No acceptable access plan. Property cannot be subdivided. Options of Action The Planning Commission members must select an access option or deny plat. If an access option is approved, then the necessar>' variances must also be granted, refer to Seetton 11.02, Subdivision 10 (A) (1-7) for required findings. If any upgrades of existing improvements are considered in your option, please include them in conditions of approval. cm' OF ORONO ucb:r\c^ QjJ PROPERTY LOCATION Site address ?c;Rn mx .street. . . . • t k- Property Identification Number (PID) <^7l |72341QQQ7 ------ Please check one - Propertv- x abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLlii^dS^ Block 1 Beau .Marais Hennepin County, Minnesota Name william F- Smith Address 6327 Cambridge St. City St. Louis Park, Minnesota Phone (home)4 7 5-2690 Zip55416 Phone (work)929-8825 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name william_f. Smitla. Address City Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 3.07 10.23 Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units__i Other (specify) Barn PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number^of Building Sites i Existing Units ____]____New Units 2 Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per 4 . i fi Acres 159429 .6 Sq. Ft. Dry' Buildable Land X Residential _________Other (specify)___________ i MINIMUM MATHUAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLEre PRELIMINARV APPLICATION 1. Paymem of fees (refer to *applicaiioii fs« below. L Completed application form.2.Completed application form. A-603 Govt. Center 348-3271).,persons you wish notified of this appUcaiion. 5.As n to this application, please attach a scpa*_____________________________ Tflning Official’s Signature ------------------------------------------- S minimum NUTERIAL required if W‘«WeV 1.Payment of fees (refer to Preliminaiy Subdivision Appro 2.Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of lormal plat. 3.Title opinion. 4.Easemenu, covenants, etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Lcner of Credit. Zoni&s Official’s Signature — L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those ifchich apply) *•<Ca« « A m S-.C0.M Subdivision of a Lot Line Rcairangcnicni-S3O0^ r>. .1.A Ir-'irinn I A ID S300.00 Totals Subdivision of a Lot Line Kearratsc-i'^-"--'-^ y Subdivision Application (Class I & smOO^^^^ non-residcmial) ----- Preliminary Subdivision Application Sj^.OO + 5-3.uu/iot Final Plat Application (Class IID S175.CX) Legal Review and Filing: ■Subdivision only S75.00 Subdivision w/easements and covenants mm. 5-UU.uu - . . _________1 1 SUDOlVlSIOn W/CUiCUlCUio oiav* _ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) ..*_l T„.„,.nv<»npnt Fms: “•r "‘s; s«o.oo . i.~ -------- Proposed Public Roads S900.00 + $.50/lineal ft.; ____________ r*,n/ rn Arrmt Existinz Private RoadR^«ffoVci^ to°Accept Existing Private^Roa^Sm^ Prop osed Sanitary Sewer .Main Extension S250.00 + S-5-snib Prop osed Watermain Extension S250.00 + $25/smb Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) SaOO.OO c:.- cv-,f..m <;ite Evaluation Review (applicable to rural lin. ft. X .50 = S_ lin. ft. X .50 = S_ ' ProDOsed Storm Sewer System (excludmg culverts; On-Sitc.S«tem. Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) —'S50.6b/^w lot proposed for on-site x __f— new lots C.Fle-xible Application Fees/TVlisc. Fees Variance S200.00 .. c i.j- • «->< nn--------Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision S'5.00 PRD Application with Subdivision S30.00/Dwelling UnitrKi-/ Iiv—------------------- itablisbed by ordinance^/ pplicant ’s Signanire Date Date '7S vner’s Signamre ^ criend “yo?r7^e lirto'iv‘j^‘th“to the mating. ‘ •-I •. L • >i % V ■.an UTi os/u/H NEWCPXN COUNTY MidPCRTY INTOMUTION SVSTTHVv; mtcm ns114’'^'•*■- r ^1,, •. . . , S. nop a 6m'.•i‘ , Oa«l MMt g TMVAVU ••« >• « if” '.4' ■' ;•; 4< •' m PROP AOM (MCR MM ,-,.’-'!‘T«<PAVfR - *; ' MM/AOOR !V •> f I 'i., ]v/. ^1.' •* * piior Amm CM€il NAM TAXPAYKII NAM/AOm :•:? - ;■f ••» 4 '*pn» Aom OtlER NAM TAXPAYER i ^ NAM/AODR r\ \ • ■./' ' • It* 0t*117-tS IS OMttoon ^ ADDR£» UNAttXGMO ,•J DOOR W•J DOODUSl ARCMiR LAW PLYMOUm m SS447 A SR OR-117-2S 14 OOOS 00401 HXLLON OR S R H RXNGCR R H RZNCCR 40S HXLLON DR S LONO LAKE M4 6S354 C t., f '. % I T L RINKR V • T L RINGER . '.JT' ’ *•> I S8 04-117-ES 41 OOOS 02450 FOX ST K A K ANDERSON KEITH A KATHLEEN ANDERSON 2450 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55S41 .•. > •**••* SO 04-117-2S 41 0007 02550 FOX ST JOHN 5 A IDSTROH JOHN 5 A IDSTROH 2500 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55S91 . *TI *' 's *.. > .* 'I Via ’ PMKRTY OMCn LISTV *.M 04«117-ES 14 0001OOOSOADDRESS UNASSIGWOSTATE OP MINNESOTASTATE OF HUM lONR)(LUCE LIW TRAIL I , •f V so 04-117-21 14 0005 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSZOMD THE STATE OF HINNESOTA DNR-5UREAU OF REAL EST HOT ATTN OMN RALLACK i 1201 E NNY 2 GRAND RAPIDS HN 55744 S5 04-117-2S 41 0004 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NXLLIAH E 06RAH ETAL DEAN R LINDBLOQH > 24S0 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55S91 ■f SO 04-117-2S 41 0005 02590 FOX ST S L CASOTTI A E J CASOTTl STEVEN L I ELIZABETH CASOTTI 2550 FOX ST ORONO HN 55S91 : REPORT NO. PI4S5401PAGE 10S5 04-117-2S 14 000200305 NILLOH DR SD R CARPENTIER/C H CARPENTIERDANIEL R CARPENTIERSOS NILLOH DR SO LONG LAKE HN 55S54 SO 04-117-2S 41 0001 00505 NILLOH DR S NILLIAH G ROBINSON HILLIAH G ROBINSON 505 NILLOH DR S LONG LAKE HN 55354 SO 04-117-23 41 0005 02420 rOX ST JOHN M A SUSAN B RINGER JOHN A SUSAN RINGER 2420 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 04-117-2S 42 0000 02640 FOX ST D A J PLUCKER DARRELL A PLUCKER 2640 FOX ST NAYZATA HN £5391 =ft JO ^' PROP ADDR ^: OMCR NAME '1. f.• TAXPAYER NAM/ADDR SO 04-I17-2S 42 0009 026S0 FOX ST DEAN ROBERT LINDBLOOH DEAN R LINDBLOQH 2630 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55S91 J SO 04-117-23 42 0010 02620 FOX ST 0 JAY A T L BUHRER 6 JAY A T L BUHRER 2620 FOX ST^ NAYZATA HN 55391 SO 04-117-23 4S 0009 02625 FOX ST DAE PETERSON DAVID E PETERSON 2625 FOX STREET NAYZATA HN 55391 VH O PROP AOOR SS 04-117-23 43 0020 38 04-117-23 44 0002 00650 GANDER RD 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED i . 'OMCR NAME PETER J CAPELL P E.ECKERLINE/H A ECKERLINE •.• TAXPAYER ■PETER J CAPELL PETER E ECKERLINE •NAHE/AOOR ‘.1 650 GANDER RO HAY2ATA MN 55391 2555 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391 ‘.•* 1 } . .^,;•*, ♦ .•..-M•-».•.'T t •' . .. V i-' f* rLn:.; *? ■■\•'• •» t '. >r »^>1 .*• *1 A. TOTAL BATCH 503 00017 I <•. ••-4 ’■• .' -V"'C-:: •k J .' *'♦'*1 ‘••*•-*•■%.-\*y. *j ^■V*••llf;.-',;mI. : •‘i’.ii'.'■ *','»'■’ '■'•*'"< •’I , * *r*.i >f.••.• ;MOtCnN COMIY PROPtHTY IMFORHATIQN SYSTEMWP«1TY 0»fCiS LIST ■Z'* ’V'.. #'fiV'-Tvr;n -..ivv: *-:^l** f ! ** * V' • I 'i y ■'* '' •’-f '’'■*■*..* *'•*'ZI.J- Z >••; Ty •y,*‘- V- •• j. 4- *'l.. . ’*!•' * Ytev 4;:) ■;«. /:/ :■ l.t ^ t ♦- L . >*■ Z .1, • •:r-x ^ ll<.f - *• '**»■' V •J **'*** ' ■■;<;' ■: ;■■• J -J*^f • * •* /> -.r . '■j v-v-‘ {^ • ■’* ' ?• • r^.v,.V:; .' • '* ••■ ••1>' ; ■■ 'U/ M V.*•»>• ’ u » A.• ■■ -:i,<V . ••;..■••'<.ri< f’] * (. J - ■■'•; V. Z..' • -■■■•'...........................................<Vt|■ * •;K‘4 % / * >v.^ J . \ • i- *,••»' r. • ■* . • f t ■.« 4 t . . .» . 1 ’’ T ** • i‘v . ' V'j V: ?; ■•’ ‘«:v- • • t ■ -.f -^V' i’> ^ ’’4 '« *• * •: • Zr ' '4 * /i*. *■ ■• o..*. . ^ ^ • , >* ^ * RfPOIIT NO.PAGC PI4S54Q111V ,f•t<■ •.i•r 1)0 V ) CO •4 •r r,'.' DATE ‘^Sby a I L,. I LJ!ir W’r ‘ W m. F. Smith COMPANIES Mav 25, 1995 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 4.L .n r 'f i'* i-7 ■pC>'< •*•<1 /i **•. *. «r.‘ —/ RE: 2580 Fox Street Greetings: In support of our proposed subdivision of 2580 Fox Street, please review the City of Orono Resolution No 1479 regarding the Stronghold Plat This is a situation veiy similar to -580 Fox Street where a private driveway serves Lots 1.2. and 3. Block 1, Stronghold A copy ot the Resolution No 1479 and the sketches of the Stronghold site are attached Also submitted tor your review find percolation tests results tor -580 As vou may know 2‘^SO Fox Street is similarly configured to Stronghold, that is, it is a long, narmw, unusual and unique lot with some wetlands The owners of Fox Run. the adjacent private property to the west of 2580 Fox Street are not interested in allowing an additional driveway cut from Fox Run, so our alternatives are either the existing driveway to serve three lots, or two driveways from Fox Street to seive 2580. 2560 and the front lot The existing driveway has been improved this month w ith the addition of 4" of Class 5 material followed by grading and compacting We believe that throimh caretlil planning we can avoid any net loss ot wetlands and in tact, perhaps, create a net gain of wetlands, by allowing the existing driveway to serve the three lots We also believe there will be no loss of trees Further. Orono’s Comprehensive Plan seems to suppoit the serving of three residential units trom a private driveway WE do not believe that the development of the south portion ot 2580 as a single tamily lot will have any adverse atVects on the public safety, health and welfare, nor do we see any adverse consec]ucnces to the neighbors or their property We are interested in getting your input into the proper way to divide 2580 We appreciate your time, vour etVorts. and your comments Wm F Snv.lh Comoan es 6327 Camordge Street Mmreaootis. MN 55416 612 929 8825 800 878 2229 fa* 612 929 30C6 I 4' '■ $ 4 f .y* * • % .V —• •• ** *" — ^ • <•>.• • • 'b-'V' CXsy of OH.OXO fUS^LUTiCK Of the CiTY CWNCtL KO. A aS5SL'-*?lON ArrrxCVINfi Tli£ ?-'T 0? STIvUNGaOLO MMAS. t.-.* citv 4r.diad «xi»tin9 ur.i:r the **v»-n« »-as. _•/*» «<>i) A*Citv C2 Orh“C h4® AdCj»»Od mt iMii witliiA th« City; Ahd •ft* *d to Tj^C* MMMWt* th«J f! of “orohd*« cn-*ita aawac« Of tho lUHll toning Siitriet * *w a site ce.-.fir-*a=i®*- iBnl S5;IS*: ;fnSii*U!:rr-td-nc. to lccet.d ^iJUot^tho »o«4 of any vorior.co*; *nd -0 City council ho. con.idcrod tho oj^pUcatton fo.- a .ubdivi.i« plot iy -^rry 3oier. tho £uhiivx-o.; end ^ • •NA • J • 0 • .-- -Kd Citv. inw»U'»***s •rocu*—^*c..u w- # •p «o*^*«*s oos^sTojntSo B.d.C^uiol'. o.-. !:.-.c put ci dtau-vc a- ............>• 1,.. of wav for public rood,Cv-iicivicr.on c*'.c p.ot o. *ij- snevn ito County Asaa ,.**o* drcf.Ud of a pr.vot. driveway w.-.ovr. or. too pUt .o Cut lot Cor.c-.-v.:;t vith tne civv.cit-n o. ^ --d the Sai>c.-viior hiii wa.wi'-*;*-'-^^ '‘‘‘ -acriur.ar.t acccuo,.ttiuut U««r.- orontu, to^^ iSHv ■di'ruro:4o«d^,or.-oxci«^ "--.^1 1-* • ‘ tv eaficrncnt over ^ of^iii'oOottir.s oni/oP ^^^?“;t“!J'i.*°jJoKont4 vkoroU oasJ. ioolorotien of evttou jot owner* eoveaant;of .r.e abuttu, and/or^..^«t.n,_^ ^ o. S!r.~ltS:Je“of kud priC-et. driveway. Pedieetron to toe City plat as; -craina'se caccs'c*'*.- . j:-: o ^1. • •t“-* •j.-r ►• '•Sk • J» •; K.'- •»* • t*. . U?.v v:'*;. tOI •• ... • T . .*• >r- •/;»..• f.-rv* » •, •V'". .. :w“' !’■.*. t Vi „ , M-'.. f-‘ ••• *1^ : -a | . •:•«■-•'• ,K k ' :n*. : . *TL '»V./' <rr: *'. *•'' *-* o • • v:«.* M0 *•• :> •*• S- h'-'' ?<r-- K^’*- *o* s Criy o>^ ORGI^O b“ fli- - * *i RISd4.UTXK or 7KS c:ty council 1W7S !u UO. ■\'9 ft.*• “• ?»i>ciiViicr*ii Aiji'co.T^jr.i •*roviii*e inatailatior. of cr.----------"*.^—5 ■^o? -A« t.wv ..S a tfor.t.cior. of tubilvisior. o?=rcval. ^ 1.2!SSror54S0.^**^aeiieotior. ?*♦ i- ?h« ft. •*; ^/MC M 5h« City for tha :«5*x reviow ar,* record’-c “iSj Sf*|75?^iocaaoftta ralatad c.'tercco in ch* |A * “ ** »2S0iV£0 cnat rhe City Council of •• \ c « «. il.t -••i:.-t •.••; t f X:^:. j - •* >.•sr.cll L.0 filed by the Citv of OroRO witb Sccordor's Office cn or before *Hv 1 • Y» ■ ^ • cocetner with a certified orl^iHST**®py c. cr.is Resolution end executed cooies of the ***®’^“-2.*.ts end covon^ncs descrioed herein. r;',*r[ »•% .* £%£? »S’“*SaSfiS;f: IftiSK,.;; S-.S'»“- ■“ revic-r.*^•.-P-i-’-.-c-e.-. with the C.ty cf Crono for subdivision ■*i- ;’v •- C.-S % < t» % »: ■• City Coonci* of the City of Crono, NianesotM ot a regular Apiij. >5 ISfcj, by a vote of 5 Avea endseeting held 6 .Nays : Av--'J-(%;• Mery C. iutier, Sayor Attest: •«*^rA- ••::r'“ :i •• Alberta «. C.rof«. City Cierjc ••.f-L •i 'll. '/•’ ..V •*.•■• 4 .* •n •‘y.«• • • •*..'*:• ■•.'i • * r ‘.et »•<*•«. * >7 ’ .: > ••• #*•’-^ m ■^;*:-v;‘•v.lf !♦ Sfe'• Iff"•’, " -'T —-— -^ ■ ^ . ‘ ^,'3^ r .■ ■•• &> v-T-e--•,x ^ .^-L*«S 3 rrao!^OLD ■#■ ••-*<^i. ♦..* ■vr.^' ••■ .-WW • “Jtrt ■l- riv • •.» .. V «V. r •• • .♦■ ** •Vj%S .*•-• •f •J I.? •1 t ■>a •# : ••• •• ^T» V. i ' .V; K1.> -X ■ •••.. % - ri •!^ J ♦••» *. . P)TU m’t* » ••»»•’.. -%•^^>^l^lK5!^r* 4 • •‘^fV ^ ♦ ^ vt^f'. V,.; f•i f, tmutam :.4i:--,«3 i A— w«> y. Xj^kdZ3^4^ t-: 4•« 4*• *•«( ::\ j* •;*\ . •rn»m • -• •• . T* ••* %•.•. • i* !•*# • . •>•t c: . •* •. / . w., •'•••• •' =-•• • V *. ■■•. -= r*v;,^A‘* 'Ar^X:'>m m • l^*- * ■1^I ^‘■fPM ^00.% m» *«r« I*-, V I ^ • * ; I !' f’ :i / f \ I w» ««• ^ «w«« /I *1 ,»•'' - J Af fJ ;* .*•.■»*.i*‘ « *^V •# ■■•’I «^ •’ • •••'• # » • t*'"! J.3!••J ^ . • • ». f% .'.•• • ^ * •/ /I I I fi r» -7! ■ v^r*•v f *- •‘■' I.» F «t'' •!vH^-:.; <*5*• 1/ I ».v lO r'.ic l **^ I •5 .1 A»7;..‘it.*‘ *.................................................... ••• - -■ •Wcv ® \ V '.. ?•>•' : / Kr-v:«r_.... . . . •:.A f.'/ f..* tl •. f •• •.V( «#« ••«»<«_«>.•■••.•••.••••»<■••*•••• v'*' .9*.* - o il; .• »* • A%**^ 4;*.'. f . ../» f. J J •*• Mm I 4 ‘ ,7^ ^.*r, ••* ^ *## ^ • •• • •* * * • }.. ci h" I f.V' i\ ^ i A1 :3. <'»/ C‘x . ^ CA. •l It ^ , » • .; \ > •I *f .' • ». ('.•'Aff .• / fn;-i t .- I’tn f'~t"f 00f!lH‘)i\f /V COFriN •I'» 1.. r*/.''* -*• vj'- .•’• •f * ■ •• • ‘ ^• Planning Commission City of Crono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crono, MN March 31,1995 -/ Re: 2530 Fox Street Dear Commissioner: Described on the attached survey and below for your review find the three (3) revised driveway options to serve the North and South portions of 2580 Fox Street as sketched by Coffin & Gronberg. Inc. Proposal A This is shown in yellow on the attached sketch and is simple a new driveway cut off of Fox Run to the South lot (the barn lot). Since Fox Run is private road owned by the three neighboring property owners, they have been contacted by me and expect that they will let me know whether this proposal Is acceptable to them. The existing driveway would continue to serve 2560 and 2580 Fox Street. Proposal B This is shown in green on the attached sketch and provide for a new driveway cut from the exist:''g driveway to serve the South lot only. The existing driveway will continue tc *.£)rve 2560 and 2530 Fox Street. Proposal This is show ^ blue on the attached sketch. This plan provides for an additional drivev/ay cut 1 form Fox Street to the South lot. approximately 200' West of the existing Fox Street cut and 100* East of Fox Run. Again, the existing driveway would continue to serve 2560 and 2580 Fox Street. None of three proposed drivev/ay options has any impact on or change to the wetland, and any affected trees will be transplanted. Thank you for your review and comments. SKETCH PLAN FORiwiLLIAM F. SMITH OF LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 1. BEAU MARAIS HENNSPIN county . MINNESOTA 1 I I *. I © . «! I DRIVEVfAV PROPOSALS A.FROM FOX RUN B.FROM EXISTING FOX STREET DRIVEWAY |c. NEW DRIVE FROM FOX STREET •1 rolTlN & GRONBERG. INC. G’lisiilfiiiy LiiiJ 5iimi/i'T<. ^ilt' r/iimit’rs ■ 4j2 fiimjMck Au'riiu* • lout* LiU‘. MN^533^ . ........ 6i2-473-ll4I I . - ■ I ► . I. I'\ . I I'll* IImI itiH '«M » • \ * f* |M». .1 I* III. *•« UM.I* I IIU •IlMl I Ml|^ » * . . Mul'll.•'i .1111 i .liiK fi.i *\il I M, IIUI * m.l I .tiiil Sum* ttf mull' ill I****!*! 'Ill S|,»U I’l Minin'**1.1 Mill lifnnN’fjii MiimrMilji iRrnvi* Numm 12^^^ M Air r-too* I'MI mu M» 95JI w JvflNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 r' (#6 - #2003 - Art and Kathy Henningscn - Continued) There were no public comments. Mabusth reported on the drainage system for the property Water drmns from fre wetland to the SE under two culverts, into a pond, to an underground 100 culvert, located under the applfcanfs driveway pavement, with an outlet at the grassed alonia line of pine t-s.entuaOy to ^along a line of pine jjea Once the plastic is removed around houI^'!^Mabwth andVlan both said this might bring flooding problems to the lower level. The applicant sai^d that the binder ^ 'po^SeL^^er r^et:n^“X^d“l‘^i:;:t5 into th^ house The grading needs to be looked at. Commission members were asked for their viewpoints. Scl^ofer ^ making a distinction between structural and non-sttuctural hardcover. Nt^^n favorably on the use of natural vegetation between the house and lake. Lmdquist th ^ the plan was ambitious but had no problem with it. He earlier made note ^ amount of uo-front structure with the two patios and deck m corapanson with the hardcover removals required. Rowlette noted the long narrow lot and how that resulted m the hardcover pooling in one area. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve Applic^on #2003 wth the ™;:^niction. Detan grading and drainage plans will need to be reviewed by City Engineer. Ayes 7, Nays 0. SKETCH PI^N REVIEWS (#7) #2002 WILLIAM SMITH, 2580 FOX STREET - SKETCH PLAN/SUBDIVISION Mabusth reported that this is a sketch plan for a subdivision of three lots. The French Lake Upper Basin has been redefined as wetland and is no classified as a protected lake The property is no longer located within a shoreland area. The RR-IB zoning requires two acres of continuous dry land. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 (#7 - #2002 - William Smith - Continued) This plan is for a division of a two-lot subdivision originally approved in 1985. There is adequate area to meet requirements of a back lot division with 7+ acres. The applicant was advised in 1985 that future access considerations required access conforming to a 3- lot subdivision. The Citv acquired no underlying access easement over the roadway in the adjacent RLS division. The owner of the RLS said he would never approve any easement or curb cut. This results in only two options, A and B, for the applicant, not three as proposed. Mabusth reported that the e.xisting driveway comes very close to the wetland. 26' setback is required. A separate conditional use and v'anance application was filed with the original subdivision application that w ould allow encroachment of protected wetland for drive to north. The bam on the property was placed in front of the principal structure also requiring a variance review. The drainage comes from both the northeast and northwest into a large wetland and continues draining througli a drainageway along the driveway to French Lake Basin wetland. Option A calls for the use of the e.visting driveway to serv e all three. The northern lot meets the back lot requirement but a 30' driveway outlot can only serv'C 2 lots per code. There is 2.12 acres to the west of the easement maintaining the required continuous 2 acres for the new building envelope. Option B calls for a 60' wide private road with a cul-de-sac along the eastern border. Major portions will be located within a designated wetland area. Mabusth said that in 1985, the applicants chose to develop a shared access drive and did not attempt to acquire an access off the RLS drive. Rowlette noted that this application is similar to the problem faced with the Cloutier application previously discussed Row lette suggested a possible new curb cut off of Fox Street to service new lot. Schroeder said this would require a new curb cut. Schroeder also said that during discussions with the neighbors, the property was always planned to have 3 lots, Nolan asked about upgrading of the existing driveway to a road. Mabusth responded that the setback from a wetland prevented this option. Due to the narrowness of the available land for the driveway, it must remain a driveway but does need upgrading. A loop turnaround was noted to be in lot 2 for emergency vehicles. The Applicant, Bill Smith, would like to keep the driveway, making necessary' improvements, and possibly upgrading it with a passing area if necessary. He preferred the aesthetically-pleasing look of the driveway to a cul-de-sac road. Smith said that one possible buyer asked about keeping the bam. Commissioners informed Smith that 3 acres are needed to allow the keeping of one horse. J I* ^ 1^ • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 1)0 (#7 - #2002 William Smith - Continued) In discussing the RLS road to the west, the Applicant reported haring spoken to the access comes from. Another option discussed was a new driveway from Fox Street, either wh a new curfr cut or the use of the existing curb cut with an immediate turn to the west. Mabusih said she would check with Gerhardson regarding a riew curb cut; but at this time, she was not certain that this option would meet Council s approv During Commission discussion. Nolan said that the the current driveway wo'dd need uoaradinR, even if maintained with two lots, as no mamtenance has been done on it. Nolan alS said that this proposal has never been done m the past and sees no reason to allow it at this time Mabusth responded that we have discussed what the code requires and have not examined the statement of hardships prepared by applicant seekmg vananccs to code requirements. Rowlene said she was interested in using the other curb cut off of Fox Street, and dws not see the propeitv as having three lots Rowlette ead from the 1985 resolution w>>eru Ts issue was discussed t he'resolution determine.: at that time that the subdivision could only be done if code could be met. Lindquist felt that a separate curb cut and separate driveway were the only alternatives, Mabusth was asked if City had ever approved a 3 lot division sen ed by a dnveway. Mabusth referred to the Stronghold subdivision in the 1980's that aUowed for a vanance and approved access via a driveway. Schroeder responded that an aesthetic argument is not a good reason for a variance ^d saw Fox Run as the best alternative His second choice was use of the original dnvew ay. and third best, another private road Schroeder said the applicant need^ to ^hai^t ^1 av enues with obtaining the use of Fox Run as an access If tins is not ^ and Rowlene said it was their opinion that this was not a subdivision. Mabusth concurrea that the use of the e.xisting dnveway, the new road off the e.xisting road, or the new euro cut were not viable options unless the commission were willing to approve the necessary variances The code calls for a private road to serve three lots. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 b.(#7 - #2002 - William Smith - Continued) Schroeder asked that the citv check whh the attorney on the aff«t on the lot as unbuddable if no variance were granted. Mabusth said that the Comprehensive Pl^ allows for three lots on a driveway but the subdivision code requires a pnvate road. The aitomev said that the code has precedence over the Comprehensive Plan Schroeder asked iClabusth about outlots. Mabusth said that lot 2 has 3+ acres, and there would be no issue with the size of outlots. The Commissioners were asked by the chair their final thoughts regarding the plam Lindquist asked if the engineer would approve a "y" within a curb ™t. Mabusth thmght this would be a possibility. Lindquist said a new curb cut off Fox Street or access from Fox Run or not buiidable. Berg agreed with this Peterson preferred access off Fox Run^ He did not wish to see a new curb cut and thought a >” would be better but not prcterred. Schroeder preferred Fox Run. He would like the attorney to look at the sjtuation and determine why it ended up as it now is Rowlette did not want to set a precedent with three lots on a driveway. She was unsure of her feelings on the *y;; Nolan agreed with this. Smith preferred Fox Run, then a new curb cub. and then the y (#8) #2004 ROBERT MELAIVIED, 920 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - SKETCH PLAN/SUBDIVISION Robert Melamed and Ron Lauer were present. Mabusth reviewed the property and the issues involved. This is a 15 acre sub^vision in a heavily wooded area, owned by the Carpenter family, with designated wetlands and types I and n not designated on City’s wetland maps. The applicant has a purchase agreement with the Carpenter trust. The property is surrounded by Old Crystal Bay Road on the west and driveway to the south and east. The drainage flows from the north to the desicnated wetland, then east via a culvert under drive and eventually to French Lake lower basin The applicant has asked the commission to look at the findings and hardships. The code would require an iirtemal road as well as a cul-de-sac. This plan results in the removal or 660 trees and the fiUinc of 2400 s.f of wetland type 1 and 2. and major portions ot designated wetland for access to the east lot Peterson asked if access from the dnveway to the north was a possibility The applicant said it was not as it would require turmng the driveway into a road. This would also require depletion of a forest area. Another option would be to come in off of Old Crystal Bay Road. ttHK U?3 ytT 1*0:4 4 HU 1 y-> S April 199S WaBim F. Smith 612/929-M25 6)27 Cambridge SuTMt Fax; 612/920«)006 St. Loyii Pailt, MN 55416 SUBXECT: FOX RUN DRIVKWAY ACCESS Dear QiU k Jennira': In rtgaid to your letter of 21 March 1995 and our subioquent telephone conversation! requeuing to have your proposed south property development have driveway access to Fox Run u requested by the City of Orono, we ira providing this response. of the opinion that the existing traflSo on Fox Run is already ourreotly too heavy and fi’Oquent for the exlitlng condition of the roadbed and the current width of the roadway. Thla seema quite evident at this springtime thaw from the quite significantly deteriorated condition of the Fox Run roadbed at the entrance to Pox Street The roadway is ver>' sensitive In the ipringtime thaw and other wet rimes of the yf*r to iraffir weioht from haavy veWf.lfi «ieh as oarhaga rnirVi. conitniction tracks and delivery trucks. The additional traffic volume and weight from an additional driveway and household would require some significant immediate upgrade of the Fox Run roadbed. The increased traffic volume and weight would require in the Aiture also more frequent and more coitly maintenance of the roadway. The additional roadbed and roadway Improvements would not only be quite costly but more Importantly would detract from the privacy and beauty of the natural setting wlJch we now enjoy . It is for these reasons as stated above, and also others not stated herein, that we feel we must decline your request. However, we do look forward to your preaence aa a neighbor and wish to express our warmeit greetings to you and your fkmlly. Sincerely, Darrell St Judi Plucker 2640 Pox Street Orono,MN 55391 612/476-4279 612/591-5437 Fax: 612/591-5413 O U O' i ic. I < I c. r. ;•nm- o-tfo mu a;io "* • *' '• * I ^ -'fDAk r u ibl Kmu I i>iO I Nu tHK tu JodJ^ob P.Ui 111 FAX MENfOrtANDUM April 0. 1095 William Smllfi Dean Llndbluom Your March v.ist 1,otter on youi Fox Street Lot At this time, 1 feel that acxess tu the potential building site la questiou would beet be sorvad from the existing drive. Additionally, since the lot has frontage on Fox Street, It should not be considered "land locked". Our private road. Fox Run, currently servos four (4) homes and 1 see no benefit in adding additional traffic ou Fox Run. I would lika to welcome you to our beautiful ai'ea and hope you are «ble to rosolve this situation in a fair and realistic manner. -- H l ' • ' t p Ill --... -••• ••---. ---. aCtJME mm lAiirti c^<u?mv<^c-^/cm *»iv>‘^n o%i> TS%A^«^«C=^ % U¥a3bi& TivA^ ^^-^t^oU -gmu.I Pcrayo?»oo Tests XSc't Borings ^ Bench Mofk Scok:±.l^SQ, Note- This system is lobe cor>strucied to med the Wnnesolo Potiution ConUcH Agency Chapter 7080 8 Local Ordinance Check ali underground utilities fTCPERTY \ iAm 1.^ W\^ 0-OT-l ---- . ovo>4o NhvJ.^0« S-P TESTING iNC Designed By ~ -zli. Ga t-^ns.^ PH. &2-<597-3566 City of ORO> C ) RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A R2C0rjTI02< APPROVING THE PfJ'.T 0? liRAU MAiUMG PILE NO. 067 WUl^It^AS# the City Orono is u ^ ^ ^ . organised and oxiatir.g under the la-.a e: the St.i'te oT ei„..,esota7 and‘'" tubdlvlsicn“r‘^egul«iln6 £or''thro"rdtrly*, V-cno-'-'r ° v*"Da"oc£ land within the City; and -no cafe dcvclop.T.ent a subdivic!of“‘Vohn“D.A?’ld?t-^^application for WUERKAS, chc ftubdi viiiior. haa.boc-n found to root all “ w“-’ diatrict, Oicept that Lot 2 ^oec nottronton a public street, requiring a varianre. but don. to a public road via a private driveway caaer.er.t over l^t 1; and “ 4.W WHEREAS, the subdivider has ccnplcted a 1 ^ reoui renent»' of the platting regulations of the City, including:'quirenent- of 1.Completion of all the requirementr. of Uesolution ?:o. 1978. 2. Dedication on the plat of rights-of-way rot public streetsand roads, shown as Fox Street. soreots 3.Dedication on the plat of drainuco and utility easements o’rov^'cf n?Vo? Co.nservation Ea.ementprov.c ng tor limitations on the use ct vet lands ond/or drainage- Lsorenta-r -dr-iinago $300^00^^*'^'^^I^edication .'='ee in the amount of 6.Payment to the City for the legal leview and filing of the plat easements m the amount of vlSO.CO; and WHEREAS, each lot :.s of a size and configuration that will . liow Its use a single family rouictnee to be tally developed •ithout the need for further variances; and ^ ^ Pago 1 of 2 rw # NOW, TUEREKORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hcrehy approveii the plat of Rcuu .Varais, Hennepin County, .''linnccotc, and incorporatir.cj withir. this approval the granting ot a variance to the recui rer.er.t for ircr.tage cn a public st'rcet for Lot 2; subject to the following conditions: 1.Lots 1 and 2 shall share a single driveway access onto rox Street rather than accessing fror. the existing private road in'jr.cdiately west of che property. Appiopriata access caseinents 20 width shall be granted fren esen new lot to the other. The driveway shall bo const'"acted no less than 26’ from the wetlands. 2.The ^ubdivider is advised that although Lot 1 contains enough dry bu-.ldable land to neet the area standard for an additional future lot near Fox Street, sue!: a subdi v'i sicn creating a 3rd lot on this property would require a replat of Lot 1 and would require construction of a road to r^csidennia.’ Private Rcau Standards to serve all 3 lots, and the City would at that time require that all 3 lots gain access Iron, such read or would need to access onto Fox Run, and variances to requirc.T.cnts would he needed for the rear lot. he frontage 3.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by t.he City o. creno with the Hennepin Cou.ity Recorder's Office on or before April 27, 1967 together with a certified oiiginal cof>y cf this Resolution nnd executed copies of the documen*:s noted above. The uoproval granted by this Resolution shall expire the plat has net been filed by the eatc specified above. In that C' -At, ;t will be necessary to file a now application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 27th day of October, I'.’SC. •»*rrfx* C ••V* • \VV ( v, \ \ . ity Clerk. ’ j .yayjr *.a.i Pii ■ - ' >, ‘v ’ Cl^Xu‘r\>G! R,4tV’ag SgSfl-Mmm lki»>J- s,?.ab.''% ■.' >. ,‘7>.l•^'^r-'•V\J 4'N-t f^-5 '^■:ll« • . * ' ♦ t mA% , X •‘ • - >-V 1.r.',I- k ‘,r •' . * • *1 . A.U • •• .N ^ in i v>\'> ia .* >1^ ■V /,.• i %.*. •>■ r X-;£- y/A-''->•;- 'V/^ .;/!'- -- '0 I .^' V r*/: 'U> '» ' :;ri‘ ‘ '■>'1 Pfl:? -‘ 3 j.i/ ’fflvV.' " ■ -toT ^^•^ ‘ >* * v>\ » ^ 0 >< iJ;.-’si m. P wm- y ■ V £5 K-t fW-o\ ORDINANCE NO , SECOND SERIES L IV ordcmance to amend the municipal zoning CODE AND SUBDIVISION CODE BY DEFINING •.tta NDARM FOR THE CREATION AM) USE OF LOTS NOT ABUT A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: , Municipal Zonina Coda Section 10.02 and Municipal Subdivision Code Section ifos. SuWvision 2 are each hereby amended by adding the foUowmg defmittons: -to, Raef - A lot tvpicallv separated from a public or private road by another lot and utoh aains ac-ss toL public or private road via a narrow corridor. Such a separated ro?^^ coL.dered to be a 'back lof when the corridor is planed as an ouilot^ .A sep^ated lot ‘s considered to be a "nag lof when the comdor is planed as pan ot the lot. lAhea ±e cor^dor is merely ^ easement over another lot. the separated lot is considered to be an "easement back lot". -Lot-Front- - A lot abutting a public or private road, across which an outlot has been platted for access to a back lot. SECTION 2. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 is amenoed by add Subdivision 27 which shall read as follows; Subd 27 SpecialStandardsforBackLotsCreatedAfterJanuary I, 1994^ L defmed I this section which were created as pan of a subdivision |hat received preliminary subdivision approval after Janua^ 1, 1994 are special requirements in addition to the standards required m Section 11.31, Subdivisi 5 of the Orono Subdivision Code: A.Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as follows: 1.Lot area shall be 150% of the zoning district requirement. Lot width measured parallel to the front or street lot line at the Street vard setback line of a lakeshore back lot, or at e ron setback line of a nonlakeshore back lot. shall meet the distnc: width requirement. The street yard or tront yard for ^ back lot will be a yard starting where the n^ow o corridor ends and the lot begins. Lakeshore back lo^ the lot width standard at the shoreline, at the 'es ore line, and at the street yard setback line. 1 P ! ninira RKIf nni@ RmiM Rmi traif^RfillilS svira i»tj nViltJ Rwia :d a. Piom Dimensional standards for front lots. A front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zonmg district area, width and setback standards, except that the required side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlet shaU be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning distnct. 4.Access requirements: Access outlets shall be 30 ’ minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring propenies. h In approving front/back lot divisions, the City may require that both front lot and back lot share a driveway access within the access outlet if Council detenmnes that creatmg an additional access to the existing street will be a potential safety hazard. C.Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least 10' from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. d.No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. e No access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access oudo^ for creation of a public or private road meetmg City sundards. 5 Screening reauirements and accessory struemre standards. Front/back lot subdivisions shall be designed m a the screenmg requirements and accessory structure standards Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 can be met. 6.The requirements and standards of this section those front/back lot divisions which receive prel . P approval after January 1, 1994. SECTION *1. Adoption and publication. This ordinance shaU :r and the La.ker newspapers ^nd shall become effective immediately p P wm tail liwt] mviit RSiTinOO EliUU] nwjvMI] RlfltJ Riira Kara RWi ^titt rattltJ mmm m¥W}Rlssra Esnra raira 1.Applicability. a. b. FroDt/back lot divisions may be used when existmg prop erty dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot width does not aUow for a ride-by-side lot split, but acrea<»e is adequate to provide a "front lot" and a back lot without requiring an area variance when the area of the outlot access corridor is excluded. Front/back lot divisions may be used for individual "lot splits" but may not be used when subdividing a large parrel ’into numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supponed by unique site factors. c A front/back lot division shall not be allowed when any existinv residence on a neighboring properry abunmg the proposed access ouUot is located nearer its affected stoe lo iine titan a distance equivalent to me zoning dismci required front yard cepth. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as follows: a.Lot area shall be 150^0 of the zoning district requirement. b Lot width measured parallel to the front or street lot 'ine at the street vard setback line of a lakeshore back lot, or at Z rear of the front yard setback line of a nonlakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning district width , The street vard or front yard for any back lot wUl be a vard stanin'a where the narrow access outlot comdor end a^d t^e ^oT^esins. Lakeshore back lots shall meet the lot width standard at the shorelme, at the lakeshore se line and at the street yard setback Ime. c The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall b 150fc of the zoning district front yard requirement. d.The required side y^d ‘^yaVd^reauLements. shall be 150% or the f bak lot shaU The reouired lakeshore yard of a la>^ meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requ 4 \ .. I • . . . ' ... & ... . : ..... ir.. ,• . I (o 1 I I IC l l \\ I' J • I z I I l /. ,.,. , !, (. r I 5.JI!/ F' •� r' , •-ti'•J.• =-c---:;- ;j. � •" ._.. _ .. _ ----·-J { ,� I So I I I J.131 N. 2.96t"'. DR'( I_ AIO CIIA rt, t.O T' I -P ' I . • Fox \ I h I I I II (i) , ,. tr I 2 I�\•I �I II i --= l:: I Street lt�a,,d lt1ff•,., i•""•,, /••ff• r .,, ,.. , •• ,, •• I•• I V'I l , _____ OF LO S1 J SKETCH LAN FO I : J II D 2, B CK 1, BE RAIS COU JTV , I ·-SOTA 1 lwri l, ,,·1111 1h.1 1 1h1, "" n \\ ., I'" p.1 fl• I , m\'"' un,h·, ,� tm • '"I ·r• , ,,1111 .• ind 1h.11 J .1 111 .l11h ,. ;1, ,·tt· I(. I\ 1 1 I n ·,n ·w, ntl I ,111J. ur, ,., ,,, unJ,•r I ,. l .1 1, ,. th,· •• ,., ,. ,., l'\I ,·,01., B. n n-2·/IJ•> q5-JI------- :1 B. ff* Ix*f SCAIE I^IOD• OAlt KMINXI 95-31 K\'la r,f;l )p3-}| '—11 / I /^'UyK-y7‘//r/ / i PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILLIAM F. SMITH BEAU MARAIS SECOND ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA / ••I f • V / SbrZCfC 16547 11 \ V \\ :• - e^OA^jL \ ^:r* A til \■) V \^"- >x \ \ \ hC ' C CM4ik*** 7M J ! W^n V v --' '\|\p ; ) '•* r-’ / /v.ti <»\ I m'ZO't, >' l\I . \l \ :i 3100 N09V»V . Note Lo» * tmcfyJt d im #L< f/«» B^aw* Mo'ftil AdJ>t‘9** i - i:!^l \ \i / " \ /y v\Q /i>T 2-V-V\ , ■'■ 'i \ \ /■ •«#•« •>*« 'M ' V'/ '-i—f --~-^v V'- Fox Je637 Street ’) •/ /• ■•' 1 OtSICNlOSY KEVtSION PA 11 nfSCRII ’IION Q ;<♦ tf !•(«*«/ #•.|•••# *•">, 7«**i»*<x# A#**r», aW a>/ /Y ij 1 n«A\v\ n\a>d'/4 fi <*tf J44f^ 0 5 -.*/ »/1 *tt,t !> COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. “ Cflihtilim Eiwihvn. Lwid Siimws, Site Plmwcrs 482 Tom.u.Kk Avenue » Lt>nR Uke, MN 55356 '612-473-4141 I luffl*\ u f1il\ Ih.il IIhv Minin M.n pfi*|Mfi-l In «•; nf ntjor m\ ilifivl mi|M f X imxmi .»m,I iIi.iI I .im .i «lnli H C ii il I n^:mivf .iml I .nul Sun in mi uiuU r llu* Liu ** Ml ll»» ''I 'll' "I Mimu***'!I NUrk S r.fiMilvi); .Mmiu*M»U I iu'iiM’ Niiml^ I'7^^ bCAIl r«joo* l»MI 2-iO-fS Ntn NO 95-31 bCAll 1 r r«joo*1 ■ •All 1 Z-iO‘fs 1 HMI NO 1 <1531 1 (Nat / 5 ssfaox I61T47 ''nV \ '''■'V\'V\ ' ' ' . y y//A *V/— V j!n\[/ /, ' '>h I y 6 \ 5 ji=i^/ / ‘tn V-___ _ 1 ^i iN \\ r ft iS7 if i'j :•. \ PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILLIAM F. SMITH BEAU MARAIS SECOND ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA *r.jio^1 1 • N09*2 i W I iV f •• —- <*• —^ I? J// I r<ntin#\ , ^ Aftf £J).4>^<’ V X ^ \ \ '^'1 i. ry- _ u ■ . Note' Lot I ii ••f ^«• ff^t Beoa Mo<a«i Sot3»i»/ 4d4/i» ?»i s ^ r i / U:. 3.^ i>l\ ^2r !W j.' \ 1\'..: 1 ) l l.' • ^ Pk^OOSi J /v. 5 -.7,? iif'i n\ )fvV I /Li'i j! / I k » :;lh s / 3 \ \ I ' I 'll? ' “ V'\|ll l '' T--------------' f '*' I ‘"-I '^\iv \ \ \ ? -. (' ‘**'V >‘ ** V ^ >?>'■'• c ^— —».,__J'' I •/ u --v^ >-uV—'V-----, N^"I9W 36657 Fok 1 DCStCNlOBY REVISION DATE Df5CRII*IKT.S Q ;■»« *f l•««Ny 7**f*M|^ A««*r^«w y<^r4*Mk' a>/ n ^s J X^4 JJt 1 DRAWN BY (D 4'2HS rApp^MtPA/* x/4#- €Prr ftp 0 f 'H V »tt»i ^PPt0 ^ COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. “ CofNfltin\! Eu^incvm, Lvul Stimn/ors, Site PInnners 482 Tamarack Avenue • Lon^ Like, MN 55356 I*?-) IIti612-473 4141 I hinln iiflilv iKii ihi^ Miriit uj^ |>ri*|\ma h nu* of urnkf mv tlihxl M»|Vf- Iisioii. .»ntl lh.U I jm jdulv ni;isU'Uil Civil I iipmff anJ I and Surw-vm uiul»*f Iho l.mv i»l llu* SlJli* I'l Minni*N4*l.i .* M^fW V ( .t^•M^vf^; VttMni*M*t,i I hvHm* \miuI4^ 127^^ VCAIf r«ioo' IIAII 2-iO-fS H Ml M » 9S-II & J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 3, 1995 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Bmlding & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2030 Richard UVere, 995 Wildhurst Trail - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Total lot area = 23,210 s.f. or .53 acres Additional Exhibits P - Amended Hardcover Inventory Q - Detail on Driveway Original Application/Current Proposal Brief Review of Application For more detail and background on this r wiew, please review the enclosed staff memo dated June 16, 1995. In a 1992 variance application, the property was approved for a 20’ x 31 ’ addition to the east side of the residence. The addition was to provide for on expanded garage area and to the lakeside an 8’ wide screened porch e.xtension and roof deck. he conditions of that approval asked for the removal of some 210 s.f. of landscape plastic along the south and west side of the residence and a detached garage structure in the street yard. 'Fhese improvements have been removed by the former owner. Some 90 s.f. of a waUc%vay to the lakeside of the residence has also been removed. The former owner obtained a building permit for the addition but has only completed the foundation and cement tloor basement. The applicant and new owner has provided an updated inventory of existing hardcover, review Exhibit P, shown at 4,991 s.f. or 36.10% not 4,900 s.f. or 35.4% as originally presented to the Planning Commission. Hardcover in the 1992 review was approved at 36.7%. In the current proposal, applicant plans to complete the 20’ x 31 ’ addition to the east side of the residence. Review Exhibits H. I, J. Kl-2, L, M and Q. In the current appl'cat'on, mnlicant seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances wit in le 250’ setback area to allow construction of an approximate 543 s.f. deck addition to the lakesi e of the residence. The deck structure will be placed over approximately 288 s.f. ot concrete and block patio and approximately 90 s.f. of a former paved walkway that has already been removed. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 July 3, 1995 Zoning FUe #2030 Review Exhibits L, M, P and Q. Applicant proposes the reduction of some 216.5 s.f. of driveway hardcover and reductions in other non-structural improvements such as the front paved walkway and reduced paved walk to back or lakeside of storage area and garage. The Planning Commission conditioned approval on hardcover remaining at 35.4%. Applicant proposes 4,978.7 s.f. or 35.9% (1992 City approved 36.7%). The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variances as proposed finding no visual impact upon the adjacent residences for the proposed lakeside deck. They specifically asked that hardcover be retained on property at 35.4% which at the time of their review. Planning Commission considered existing hardcover on property. Applicant now shows existing hardcover at 36.10% and proposed at 35.9%. Staff has drafted an approval resolution and has left the approved hardcover level blank so that Council may make a final recommendation concerning approved level of hardcover. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To deny or amend the enclosed approval resolution. F kr L A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2 FILE NO. 2030 WHEREAS, Richard LaVere (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 995 Wildhurst Trail within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: The east III’ of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23 (hereinatter "the property "); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2 to permit construction of a lakeside deck totaling approximately 543.6 s.f. of new structural hardcover where 4,991 s.f. or 36.1% exists and where 4,978.7 s.f. or 35.99% is proposed and where 25% is allowed; and an average lakeshore setback variance of 6’ where no encroachment is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FEVDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2030. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 23,210 s.f. or .53 acres. 3.The Orono inning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 1995 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A.In 1992, the City approved a hardcos r variance within the 75-250’ setback area at 5,082.58 s.f. or 36.7%. Pace 1 of 5 4. E. r. B.As a condition of the 1992 approvals, required hardcover improvements have been removed and hardcover is currently at 4,991 s.f. or 36.1%. C.Based on the curvature of the shoreline and the location of mature trees in the adjacent street yards, the proposed 6’ expansion of a deck beyond the average lakeshore setback line poses no visual impact on the adjacent properties. D.The proposed improvements will result in additional reductions in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area. The lakeside deck would be consistent with adjacent lakeside decks on residences also designed with walkouts to lakeshore. 543.6 s.f. of new deck area shall be installed over 378 s.f. of patio and former paved walk area approved in 1992. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv-e a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, satety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, tlie Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2 to permit the construction of a lakeside deck of approximately 543.6 s.f., subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 t 1.Hardcover is approved at 5. 6. s.f. or %. Both existing improvements to remain and proposed improvements are shown on Page 5 of this resolution. Applicant shall maintain improvements as designated on this plan. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be e.xercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 10. 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions ot this variance shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Euw-ard J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July , 1995 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hall in. Mayor and City Clerk of ° Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of t e City. Notar)' Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary' Public within toown to m^'t^L^the described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 4 of 5 To: Date: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 16, 1995 Subject:#2030 Richard LaVere, 995 Wildhurst Trail - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Total lot area = 23,210 s.f. or .53 acres Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) deck at lakeside of residence. Allowed = 0 Proposed = 6 ’ -Average lakeshore setback variance for upper level 2.Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance within 75-250’ setback area. Total area = 13,835 s.f. Allowed = 3,458.8 s.f. or 257c Existing = 4,900 s.f. or 35.41%* Proposed = 4,991.58 s.f. or 36.08% (5,082.58 s.f. or 36.7% approved with Api lication #1726) Variance - 1,532.S s.f. or 11% *AM haidcover sche<1uled for n.-uoval as a condition of aoproval of Application #1726 has b«;en completed (pi-istic and det.iched garage). List of Exhibits A -Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D -Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Form E - Resolution No. 3118 F - Site Plan Approved. Application #1726 Gl-2 Floor Plan & Driveway Detail, Application #1726 II -Current Floor Plan & Driveway Detail 1 - Front Elevation, Application #1726 J - Current Elevation Kl-2 East/West Elevations L - Lakeside Elevation M -Amended Deck Plan N - Survey, Application #1726 O -Current Survey Zoning File #2030 June 16, 1995 Page 2 Review of Application In 1992 the City approved hardcover variances tor a 20 x 31 addition to the east side of the residence. The addition was to provide a third stall for the garage and to the lakeside, an 8' wide screened porch extension and roofed deck. The conditions of that approval asked for the removal of some 210 s.f. of landscape plastic along the south and west side of residence and the removal of a detached garage structure in the street yard. Staff can confirm that the detached garage and 210 s.f. of plastic have been removed. In fact, the entire driveway has been disrupted in the previous owner ’s preparation to redefine driveway access (shown on Exhibits F and G-2). A building permit was issued in 1993 but only the foundation and cemem floor of basement have been completed. Applicant’s surveyor confirms that approximately 4,900 s.f. of hardcover improvements exist on the property at this date. Review Exhibits L, M and O, the current owner proposes completion of the addition and has expanded the application to include a lakeside deck that would result in a 6’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line and 91.58 s.f. of additional hardcover in the 75-250 setback area Note lakeside deck will be installed over existing cement patio. Applicant has amended the plat to also include an 8’ x 18’ deck to the west. The 8’ deck expansion would not result in an increase in hardcover because it will be placed over existing concrete block patio. The deck extends 14 ’ from the residence at its widest extension to lake. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit E, the original resolution that approved Application #1726 and Exhibit A, applicant’s current hardship statement. Issues for Consideration 1 The proposed drive and the approved drive with Application #1726 appears to be far more ambitious. It is also not clear from the information provided in the detail plan. Exhibit H, the area of the new covered porch and redesigned walk. Staff will ask applicant to provide hardcover detail on proposed improvements. Areas of house footprint. Approved deck. Covered entrance porch, street entrance walkway, driveway, and entrance monuments. This information to be submitted to staff prior to scheduling the application before the Council for final action. 2 Upon vour site inspection, determine if there will be an impact on lake views of maximum 14 ’ extended deck at second level. Note alignment of homes and location ot trees. Total deck area is approximately 562 s.f. Should area of structural hardcover improvement be reduced? Is the 14 ’ maximum depth of deck at lakeside acceptable. L Zoning FUe #2030 June 16, 1995 Page 3 3.Applicant has provided no information on area beneath lakeside deck provide information on any proposed changes. Applicant should 4.Any other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action To deny, approve or amend the variance application for an average lakeshore setback and K'jvdcover variance within the 75-250’ setback area. Any condition of approval must include the following: 1.Applicant to provide detail on proposed hardcover improvements to include areas of following improvements: Footprint of residence structure to include covered entrance porch at street side. Final approved footprint of upper level lakeside deck - also hardcover improvements that extend beyon*^ deck at upper level. Walkway and driveway detail to include area of new entrance monuments. Hardcover facts to be submitted before application is scheduled before the Council for final action. 2.Other conditions reco;imended by the Planning Commission. // CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIO?j^ Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no change from original application) Variance for non-confomung structures S20f .00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 0^^ •Try M.c QfiC^nt 9 m W 9 19m 9 ••mi w k,'fcTkfAnrc nrcTrc f jkfTrfrn.i. Uf t A v'wrVi-WV'VV PROPERTY INFORMATION j Site Address ^9^ M A fA ¥0—L Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) rryi-iTci-ri^uzrv r\ L*l f i- -----r.crcrc-T^ru^W v<Kirtuu'Cir r 11 tmJi\ t uv £.\/Vi -An Auach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date PrQpeajL Acquired /2>/ a:aM90 coot aoi TO n^.i~tv (month'year) uaic r r"|-^iiT ^v-vjv^vv-v* » - f • ~ 1 z-i-------j------—-—- I (do)((^^also own the adjacent parcels of land PresenrusTofpropeny: ^/residential -----othei (specify). Zoning Disnict: ^ ‘--------------—------------------ applican Name Address:u),iAi00?’ .: i hone (home) ^-/ Phone(work) 3c^- ^Qg-7_ City:o OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______________________ Phonahome) Phone (\vork)_ Address:Citv;Zip: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback; ___Lot Width Front __Side \ Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specif}’) IT vRnSHTP/DESCRIFriON OF L^X'SUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS )j;v_EA^£e^-; P»-Q>VL (0-3/ /P: r--------^a/^ D6 CKJjtU. 0t>,.A 0101 SL(06r£. Dnc<.S 7 ff,<r *7 . y —(attach additional sheets if necessary).^ ^/\lAr\y\C(: LAV-(:^\D6 ^iU^^e^TA'pO^ cf /Yr>i^v6. '^(lty^\A Ir'ArZnYi/tC^ ^ 0.€SOC ^JHOtA 3//<^ L_ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information he submitte d bv the application deadline date In .order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. 4. u' ^Completed Application Form ................. ■J/Cenified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtam^s list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). t/Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). “I>^ertificaie of Survey (signed by a licensed surv'eyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8I/2 x 11 for iaI^ Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8W x 11" for reproduction. i/Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8W x 11"). List of the leeal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest m the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons ^ you wish notified of this application. ___Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that jour variance applirntion is not complete if the above information has_not been included ^ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoumg Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true an^corre^t^r^^ b^t of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature !'KX /i^(-------Date 5----- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ^w——------------------------w*' this change prior to tlie meeting. ,_ t I • ( I• ( I I I ( ) . . . . . .. . . . . . .. (' ^ !MM DATE OS/a/H ^ I •BATCH 501MOP AOMOMCR NAMETAXPAYER*NAHE/AOM I •\ PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADM OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR M 07-117-25 12 000200075NXLDNURST TRA i L SODERfUNAIL 800ERMAN975 NZLDHURST TRAILMOUND m 55564 56 07-117-25 15 0216 00996 HILOHURST TR R»N ZEDECIC A R J ZEBECK MNALD N A RITA JANE ZEBECK 996 NILDHURST TR MOUND m 55564 56 07-117-25 21 0004 00997 HILOHURST TR C E BOEHM A M A C BOEHM CHARLES A MARY Am BOEHM 997 HILOWJRST TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 56 07-117-23 21 0015 04455 HEST BRANCH RD JANE E KLINE «JANE E KLINE 4455 HEST BRANCH RD MOUrO) MN 55364 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATIONPROPERTY OHNERS LIST58 07-117-25 12 000500995NKOKURST TRHILLIAM A 61LLQUISTNILLIAM A GILLQUIST995 NILDHimST TRMOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 15 0217 01000 HILDHMST TR RAI CONST OF BLOOMINGTON RAI CONST OF BLOOMINGTON 1487 SHORELINE DR HAYZATA MN 55591 58 07-117-25 21 0005 00999 NILDHURST TR R H A A A CAVAN ROBERT H CAVAN 999 HILOHURST TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-25 24 0045 0ft06 NILDHURST TR R2I CONST OF BLOOMINGTON RAI CONST OF BLOMINGTON 1487 SHORELINE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 I.SYSTEM'}<4* :•H,.■I'f-** «•$ / INL ^ INC : •? • V Y"*‘ INC INC REPORT NO. PI455401PAGE I56 07-117-25 12 000900605 FOREST ARMS UJ A A E S FRETHAMJAMES A ELIZABETH FRETHAM605 FOREST.ARMS UMOUND m 55564 56 07-117-25 21 0005 00995 NILDHUI^T TR R C LAVERE A J A LAVERE RICHARD C A JULIE A UVERE 995 HILOHURST TR MOUND m 55564 58 07-117-25 21 0006 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HARRIET J MORGART HARRIET J MORGART 1005 HILOHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 TOTAL BATCH 501 00011 % I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE <5 ^ I nr* ■. .V T • ^.-;-r-..I ^ I' ‘i.sJ ' • i i. ' I-• • ■ , f . * IO••1•. .•1: •t---' ■• v; .U ! , 1 . y., %.. I. ; «• V. • »* * . • H .* f . ••. Y’ • $ •,.’.i I• * .e ? •\ • -..jy .• •»*l» , •• •' 4 I • '..V'r* ‘ ■. ‘; «‘I t / 1 •/ >Su Adjacent Property Owners ’ Acknowledgement Form ^(we) K . 1 I U\ (o i KyDihS of ^ 2 ^ { C li U r S'~^* [print address][print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located Sit 9^6 U),lJkvur^'\ also referred to as Land Use Application No.________ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I rive) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the propertv' or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s proj^t or^se requires Coj^ncil approval. I ri 'Property Owner ^r\ ^ Date Property Owner Date x< He *»>**«« H>«>t< It< «If 4> <C 4> ****<!»••*’O * ** 4*4'’ll <"<'’I'*’i* >!<’i‘* * O'^ I PtI (we) d 4at- :f £r.^, [print name(s)] ? 17 [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at CO/lJCtci.rcJ TtZA-11 also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the propeny or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council approval. Date <P Propert>' Owner Date X If you have any information that may assist the City in die review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3118NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO TnN^2°SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE #1726 WHEREAS, Barbara J,located (hereinafter "the ®he City of Orono (hereinafter at 995 Wildhurst Trail The East 111 feet of the ritfe*H^°6 8r9f6^rHJnne7“n C^nty Minnesota .hereinafter -the property”); end WHEREAS, the applicants "subdlvis'ion°2 to -th^ -r-irsO° s;et= air excess ^Of ^haraco.er exists proposed at 5,032.58 s. . ^^Q^ed and a variance to orri.r-sehd^rirsrll 5 .B. to^per.it |,He eaaition^to the file' In^ld irti:%rured !»■ recuirin, approval of a 4- 4- or 44% setback variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of orono, Minnesota: findings 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1726 L'le^llrrRlsilelt^“rzoi"inroirricrreq ’ullinrin^ acre in area. 3.The Orono P lanning ^Tni^rcol^lndlf plopord vil'ialces'based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 (L M CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3118NO. 4. A.The existing detached within th^reet 2-fro. the curve adjacent to the public roadway. B.The detached garage in this area does not confo^ to current development pattern for homes wrthrn this neighborhood. C.There is no hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. D.The proposed addition and second story b®droom expansion will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. E.The neighbor receiving the most i^pnct the proposed construction has provroed a written Statement approving of the application. Th*. citv Council finds that the conditions existing on this pr"^opert“ are peculiar to it and "°t ®^lj oenerally to other property in this toning district, that granting the variances would not adversely traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard orothlr danger to neighboring property, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is L^-in^w 'p/fhe-o,^^g^lode and Comprehensive Plan of the City 5.The City Council has considered fPPj-^^f^the including the fin^iiii,|fty"c™tafl.by thrapplicants and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the commun y. Page 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council 3118NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS to the east side of the within the 75-250' second story addition over the exist and to approve a Ift^^^dT^afd^rethlc^^^or to the east lot line, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall °°«in a '’permit*'/or “ew ?^nst^r^uit\=o\“° Thl%%t:c///;,araje ^ within 10 days of occupancy and use of attacneo g 2.Applicant shall remove 210 •f.lT/°?oo\°//g and west side of = ® ?u^ °/on The Building .......... 3.Authorities granted by T“^but%/e'*perm^ -n?y-/nVrus “/^/e7.e7//se ^ ^rptti7lf^of^hrs^^-^a^^^“lf on that date {May 11, 19 9 3). 4.Violation of or -n-co-U-oo and conditions of this cHtI 1 automatically term\"/a\°e" any au/horrtTgrante'd herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor 5. The undersigned applicants have read unnerstood^and hereby agree to the '^h “rs‘, successors andbehalf of tho-elves,^^the^ir^heirs^^ re/oYutUn in the^ ch/in of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 I I b' e;^ </r<^'ivnw^<r :s'' \mIT CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OFTHECITV COUNCIL NO. 3118 Adopted by the '3.^’=y^J°d"o'n the llth^da'^y of Mfy°i99 2'.Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the litn y ATT T: ~>>n i/a ; ^o?bthy MT faa*lin,_ Ci^ty Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) / STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The =foorotry m1 this 11th day of May, ^ ritv of Orono, a Minnesota ”un\^pal”:o^%^t\t=o^n^=n^^L\d\n\\\u^^^^^^ “was executed on behalf of the City. 12-m; •• • i;, »■ • of^o mliK CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3118_________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. iritLH__________19 5^ before me>,Notery ,Pu;^ On this jM known to me/to be the foregoing! trument^ ^^^^^30^ and deed, the same as his itheir; rree ea JAMIELBOSMA NOTARY PUBUC-fJi.*iNESOTA H Q ^lyyX,\AjU HENNEPIN COUNTY »My Ccmm. Excites 12-19-97 .aa3egBiS3gaeag5!333£3 NOTARY PUBLICV STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. , 199_, before me TNotiry Public wIThTn^and°lor said County. pTr'sonariy appeared Tt°he^r exfS NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 I WIL HU T T Al I n ^3 IT V V. •'> r) «-• / -I i! . i ; \ \ i-VN O' •c- .1 , « r -J. r» •V^• - n .f J| u ‘ < X Ij J 0 1A N r ***'n I •vr SIX »•E^-r I sjG m A I Kj L-^y/^ L -I c •• \l; li» I !■" f • • •■ :1V r. »/ ‘ \- S-, \ V / * ,'^OA^Vvu-rs^ 'lt\'\2.G LI .. ....... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' f / I I I I I I I I I , I , I I I /1 /! I / J .. () V' . I .• � t \). .,. w' /J .-\_ . I•• ( . . ) • I .. I.. u �. I I -• 1..� l-•• ·'·- ' .. l \ I . . ' ' ' I Il I ' �� � I i I\ I 1 �-I. _ I .. ,.,.. .. • • 0 "' '" I II f --- '--- I I ,- --I I I.. -· .., I I I --- I \ I I l I =�n II II � I I Ii I . l I ( . . \ . . . ,, .. ... . ..... .. .. . . ·: ..,, ... ...•'•' ... .. .. :·! • . . ..... ... '''• .. .. .... .. .... ...... . ., . ' I • • .. ., ..., ,, , : I '• .... .. ,.-, I (' ,., . t •:;., I � CT (I) N C0 0 ) • I I ' -- C'1 i \ / X '■\" \ tt ■X' ‘'V1.1 J____ — f 1 \~- K > ttl j 1 0 h-:a» OV ipi> 0 Nrf^ t I » • • M ir ■-4 — I i_ .."-r TT~n ‘. ! ' i1 -~XL rI; c 1 “-t S->v*f ‘' , f I fv^f flf sL (].D0 '■ t\ •» rj^i. rr r\' i f 1 1 ! 'E^•« LL 1 I n '•1 1' 1I { .1 ,i 1.Ti 1-i!I '> i "I • t rrin^"! } 1 Ulri .4^ I .1 5 i- P"Cc: r r't^L_^\/A“T c .1 ®4ffiSl]0 t> r 11 AM 0 u M. b % • 0 CO ti < 00 V/) UJ I < I / / mPt ^ Tffi ly-'n-fr^ •' / >♦: (; 1) -ii. >»j _ 4 «\, •*• • ••. » •. • , • 'oJA^Wa^T N(i- ;•••.: :s,:r-'-i ^^r• :r-o%N-'ia\ iV n:iu •nrx^ A6 ‘T’ "r p"” ^ I tii i^ T1 li I T-| l-t r1 k^,*-v/E*4-. . ^c.6^aH^. UHiuA/t- l/^«» I'.D £:. UB. V/^T 1 S4 A.- \ ------------—_____ \ I 8! A t a Xi W! I — I 2 1- < > 111 J \l\ I /§ r ■* V- .'v‘ . I • I1 I . . -. ::. I ,1 '' • I• I ,l U1 1 f -. ---- ..,._ - - -- -i uJ l l=. 61·, { � I f I I � 1. -1 -I , I 1 I I ., . K • *• ‘•••4 t 1 � '' J \I)" \I} '.• _,,,, lJ\ ... lz I , ( I -n I 0 •..\ L. I O u 0()5,,._ l i=f •. ;, ... ,_ . /. \ I I • J (.} , ., , ,., , (' . . · . .,,.I• I •• 0 • I I I t', ... . ,,I . , ) ., ' . ., II" I -,, . I . , I ' •,,�,.. / , � , , I ,, I .... .,1,�, 1 I \•·I I I . '. \ •• rl O" , I I, }, ' \ .,. I / I ', , ' f --I . , . ,I . ' .. 'f' • • I .r I ., I ". ' • ,..,, "' .. ,, r:, • ' , I J WILD HURST TRAlL I • \ ' \ 1-Jv-e . .. , .�ll �r . � i L, c9 I ) / I I ., .., I• I I , I .. I 7 L , • I • ·i / . ·,) ' ._ � , I I -I I ,I I' . , >I I /, �, ) t • I • l. 0 . r,C -, I '0 R rHoll £ ¢ l \ - /" I J f•O I I .. I . I , . , .. ( .-,_. / . l , ,, ' \ . �. . . f , . .. -r l " . ·I •/ ., I . hardcover CALCULATU2;iV^OKK5iii:.ti SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING RARDCQVER IN ZONX A.House ■9 75-250’ C 25-500’ Lecstb WidLh X X X /- ^ /s ss B.Garage C.Driveway '/V 2 a'' D.Sidewalk X E.Patio/Dcck a/ F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G.Other 2. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^n'7r -B li?iS PROPOSm HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.Mouse 30 Length 22_ Width /5 OC V 5 .X 7 B.Garage iH C.Driveway ____X X D.Sidewalk 'j r2 X lO E.Patio/Deck 7 F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabnc G.Other cCi,{ »v«.^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A V?7r.7 ^ B I -i A 100 = ^(6 r *7''rr *»' ' C _____X _________________ _____X_________________ X _________ •/' ■ V'‘ 1‘v* > X 100 = /^O /Z 1^0 iZKr.S "5 C'O /iJ? 1 i O >> ±(j:0 =Jl7 / V f^^oo 1 'S (/ o ^ I 500-1000’ _____ S.F. S.F. S.F. £rt; S.F. >^;«Vrv- S.F S.F, S.F, S.F. . S.F. S.F. 6-^*^* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F ^99/ S.F S.F A B S.F. S.F. S.F. 1/ S.F. ' S.F.‘' S.F. - S.F. c p -T S.F.Ti-'^o S.F. Oe” c(^ S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. I -1 e Z S____ S.F. A B /O , 9 ' ' ..... ' -. -..... - ,... ... ------ I i ::, • > ;.-.. ••• I I .. \ I \ I .. I ,. •.. I � � .,, ' WILD HURST I r J Ou J ., I • <-cs"' 1//. .JI/< ,. . 11 '.r �'!I TRAIL I t t/ 2., " ,, pell --·- � I t\J I r 1.l (l�Ou 2 b <Ys'1 I 6 , , \ I I \ •. .. ' , --- , . I I I I I Jo �C.7,4 D 4<. �,v.. �� �41 ,� �� I ') ? r (,./ 1/ � ,•1-;t -{.l- (, • (_) -- m Gw;i.4CILMEEnNG JUL 10 1995 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July TQJ^Of ()||0|||Q ITEM NO.: (T1 Department Approval: Name Michael P. Caffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: North Shore Marina - Clubhouse Sewer Connection In March 1994 Council approved a building permit for remodeling of the clubhouse building near the shoreline. No structural work was involved, this was essentially a cosmetic remodel. According to City records, a sewer connection permit for that building had been taken out in 1970, and it was assumed to have been connected to sewer. Yesterday Rich Anderson had Roto Rooter out to clear the clogged sewer line from the clubhouse bathroom. They found an old septic tank in use. and we have concluded that the cabi n apparently never was connected to sewer, even though a permit was issued 25 years ago. City codes won’t allow continued use of this septic system and Mr. Anderson would like to solve the problem by connecting the clubhouse to the sewer line in the Marina OtOwC building 40 away. While a plumbing permit will be required, no connection charges are due. North Shore Marina has been paying quarterly sewer charges on this unit for many years. This item is brought to Council’s attention because completing this connection adds to the permanency of this nonconlbrming structure. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approve a plumbing permit for the clubhouse conditioned on suitable abandonment of the existing septic system. Staff is working with the applicant and his contractor as to exactly how that connection will be made, considering the intricate web of various utility lines buried in this area of the property. (Note that, although a holding tank was suggested as an option for this seasonal building. City code would require the use of municipal sewer where it is available). Options for Action 1.Approve connection per staff recemmendation. 2.Table for further discussion. 3.Disallow connection (state preferred alternative - removal of plumbing from clubhouse?). 4.Other. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to issue a plumbing permit for the clubhouse. ch 7 • ,• , I' / /. 2 3 ,, '1 I I ' , 1 1 J I c ■ Ti-r CLUB uaiCF FLOOB FLAN m 3222 NorthshoreJ^r wayzata, MN 5539 (612)^71-262' I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Ivll Associates Engineers & Architects June 19. 1994 City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-066 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: Navarre Lift Station No. 7. Our File 13973 C**w j ? ^ A •! ‘ 'I P? n L H " ' - f ^ .2 c"*’ A Cj «a ^6 f Pf Hoce** 3 Scrunjc^ *f ^ fhe* n : •.• : »*tu v^r — * jL.nZ'.r "S •7 •i A K !f' f c=»v 1 O Uwot^ Hcce*f C ffyi .e* »a :e —.- A 3owr'>. «^ •’€ \<a'» A P: V .-•' *e T T.iutr-.mn rj ^ ^ e i Pf ’ Ana»';o^ A : > 2“ -.-a c p? A V*'*; •' •rr* t ,* V*»»- w XC ’f ♦-r VtA'^^eX ®f ''A - *s .%fc Pf ^ ’ V • ‘’t ^. . •' r*^.. .. — P« -1’ . *’ i •f^ Andet ‘ X* Pf R To*f% 2»5 M.v*i A Sf<0 Pf C* •» V ‘A' V ?• •e*' Pf •* »U: G.*''''-'* Af A ? I t ®f A P( •*' ip c *\ veti ^ V wr i) X • ii\ ®6 M-«e*8 '•n*cf' PE u ®E •. e*' l A *1 :c • •• -• -^ 6^ J^je Pi P if.\>p Pf r>pv»a./*^ 1 Ae'V't p? Zei. C? v.e» ®E ’•All G xj«w» p Oo»ae» p| D.<n O Bcyi/n Pf je't ’Ty J £*'ie^ '^e' >o\eo<^ P »»>e'n Pg lee M Mcv^n pg C*‘pne» A f» '*scn trr M , •4^ *” V C .•■>'' *3-e r *.t ■ - 3 *»'e * £■■*■ *' t* COUNCIL wro JUL 10 lQq,s CiTV Of PfiOC/oJUN 2 1 /o Dear John: Enclosed are five copies of Request for Payment for the Narvarre Lift Station No. 7 Renovation. We have reviewed the Request for Pa>Tiient and recommended payment for the enclosed sum of $ 5,394.29. r:- Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOClA'l ES 0' Karen A. Cavett cc: File 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 V I iTHMi la —ill n Owner: CiiyofOrono 2750 Kelly Parkway, Orono, MN 55232 Date June 19, 1995 June 19.1995 Request No. 1 •% » • , > '>. 7 •*Id. f ▼ kEQUEST FOR PAYMENT —' ' -Nai4irre Lift Station No. 7 Renovatioii , ^ ^ —rrt : ‘ . y * 4 ‘ '» :-x 3 .UJi\ File No. 13973 SUMMARY 1 C.-iginal Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deducticn 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Sub-Total 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO S $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: FORD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S 56,782.00 56.782.00 r,.678.20 000 5,678.20 28'».91 5,394.29 0.00 5,394.29 Specified Contract Completion Date September 15. 1995______________ I3973RFP wbl Date: RFPI Item Unit Contract Quantity Unit Quantity Price to Date Amount to Date Part 1 - Total Base Bid Renovation of Lift Station No. 7 for the LUMP SUM of:$56,782.00 10%55,678.20 Part 2 - Alternate Equipment Bid Item Manufacturer Deduct -10,000.00 Total Work Completed to Date 55.678.20 I3973RFP.wbl RFP 2 ■w PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner City of Orono Project No. Fife No.13973 Contractor Ford Constrriction Co.. Inc. CHANGE ORDERS Amount 1 2 3 'jmf Total Chanoe Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 Start 6-19-95 $5,394.29 $283.91 $5,678 20 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $5,394.29 Original Contract $56.782(K) Rctainape. P.iymcnt No 1 $283.91 Change Orders Total Amount Earned $5,678.20 Revised Contract $56,782.00 l3973RFPwbl RFP 3 T TTTM^»'rnT-«rr>» '«CIL MEETING L 1 0 1995 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 29, 1995 ITEM NO; / / Department ApproTal: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Resolution Calling for Willow Drive Improvement A public hearing was held at the June 26 Council meeting regarding the proposed project to reconstruct Willow Drive from Highway 12 to the northern boundary ot the Otten Brothers Nursery property. The purpose of the public hearing was to receive comments from the public regarding the proposed project. The comments received were as recorded in the minutes of the hearing. The purpose of the project is to widen the roadway to enable lane channelization to match the new Willow and Highway 12 signalized intersection. The project will provide a left-turn lane from Willow to Highway 12 and a right-mm lane from Willow into the Otten property. There was no action taken regarding the project at the June 26 meeting due to the need for a 4/5’s vote. It is recommended the Council now take action to approve moving ahead with the Willow Drive improvement proje't. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to adopt the attached resolution calling for the Willow Drive improvement sttn-wi li mm RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR WILLOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a motion of the city council adopted the 22nd day of May, 1995, fixed a date for the council hearing on the proposed improvement of the intersection of Trunk Highway 12 and 650 feet north on Willow Drive, and WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 26th day of June, 1995, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA; 1.Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted this 26 day of June, 1995. 2.Plans and specifications prepared by Glenn Cook, engineer for such improvement pursuant to council resolution, a copy of which plans and specifications is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby appioved and shall be filed with the city clerk. Adopted by the council this__day of_____, 1995. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan. Jr. Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk 052295 10 *4. COUNCIL c. JUL 10 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CfTYOFOROu J DATE: July 7, 1994 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Ronald A. Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Rcpon Item Description: Bid Award - Willow Drive Improvement Attached is a letter from Glenn Cook, City Engineer, listing the bids received for the Willow Drive Improvement and recommending that the project be awarded to Buffalo Bimminous in the low bid amount of $131,982.50. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to award the bid for the Willow Drive Improvement Project to Buffalo Bituminous in the low bid amount of $131,982.50. Isv ; ,4n Af- r^t^: \ t Ai : ^ S a ^-* a £-c Ck^ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects June 8. 1995 John Gerhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Willow Drive, SAP 152-101-11 Flic 13962 C::o 0 Bc^it-co •£ Pcse'? .V ^ere • . -iesn C • *5 ?.cnjr«J£ G ^ Cc ®- Trcfrat £ %o>^i Rcae^: G Su'-.vi •.< £te* ^ C •Cinw*U''t Hcs%ah3 A ^ tn A GofC-»' *£ 7cce'! 7 ^•♦*e"e •■*' M* '? 3^*«3 C L3»«0!J ’£ »ccf't C utse« aia jer'V A Sc^rczn PE VUrt A H^rscn PE VI.-fW»e< T Tec * ^ e:fl ®E Trotrai 7 Ar^e'son A I A Dcna*c C 9wfC.^cr PE Tfxjmat A Sji'tc Pfece' c ; ^5 VA'T’net 7g 7 7aj ^ A **?'e'scn ’H V’C**.*e^ C urx'' PE ^jrrev ^ Va:erc ~£ .e»rv O »e»T:sch P£ !.r * . A'**re* ■*5 P A'‘2e".' VAft « »c f$ n \»A'« A Se 0 PE Ca^v W Mo'-en P£ 3 j O^mo*^ AIA Darnel J Ec^e^'.^^^ ®E A Scrr^c: ®E P^iio J Caswe^J PE va»* D .vai.i* pf v*;es 8 ®E L c G'.’vet ^E <a'en L A-tmef*.?E 0of¥ 2 stc^TJ. PE 3f:an < C.««;e *? <e 7 \'cc. Pf Douc P» J Se'^t P£ Sr.t.vn G Gwii^'tcn =5 Cec 'C C v.e* »l P?u< G »-»e^-e' PE ,o*“n P Gcrse* ^E Dan O Savum. P£ J^tirry J E'^e'inger PE JO seen ff 7he-n PE Lee V NAaon p£ Ch-anes a 5r casen teo M Pa»%e'tny HJfian \1 Oi‘<on .Acres M p rv; .a-"ei f £'>ge ''<»'0: We have reviewed the bids received on Willow Drive north of T.H. 12. The following is a summary of the bids received. Low Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. U2 Hardrives, Inc. #3 Wra. Mueller & Sons, Inc #4 Valley Paving, Inc. #5 DMJ Corporation #6 Master Asphalt Co. $131,982.50 $132,477.23 $139,667.25 $146,001.25 $164,946.50 $172,608.75 The bids received are high but the two low bidders are competitive. It does not appear that it would be beneficisJ to rebid the project The reconstniction was extended 100 feet beyond Ottens driveway to facilitate drainage and clean up the ditch area. This section could be eiiminaled reducing the contract amount by approximately $27,000.00. We would recommend that the project be awarded to Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $131,982.50. If the City elects to reduce the project scope a change order should be prepared and be a part of the contract award. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCLATES, INC. 7^ C-U- Glenn R. Cook 2335 West High way 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEEHNG JUL 10 1995 CnYOFORONO DATE: July 7, 1995 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name Joan Gerbardsoa lllto Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Adminisci'ator’s Report Itpm Description: Resolution - Prelin inary Plans for County Road 15 On May 22, 1 >95, Council reviewed conceptual plans for improvements to County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road to the Orono/Wayzata border. After review of the plans. Council directed Hennepin County to proceed with preliminary plans for that same area. As a matter of procedure, a resolution should have been submitted and approved. Attached for Council review and approval is Resolution No.directing Hennepin County to prepare preliminary plans for improvements to County Road 15 east ot Orono Orchard Road. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve Resolution No._____directing Hennepin County to prepare preliminary plans for County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road. N?.'' •s'** nBW.; ;'-^ m n ; , 0'’f»it II m A RESOLUTION DIRECTING HENNTPIN COUNTY TO PREPARE PRELLMINARY PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD 15 EAST OF ORONO ORCHARD ROAD WHEREAS. Hennepin County has presented concepDial plans for improvements to County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has reviewed the plans and has conducted a public meeting for the residents to offer comments; and WHEREAS, the City Council agrees that preliminary plans showing more detail should be completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby direct Hennepin County to prepare preliminary plans for improvements to County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road to the Orono/Wayzata border. Adopted ’ . the City CouncU of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor Paee 1 of 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 22, 1995 / ITEM NO: / ^ Department A;>oroval: Name Ron Moorse Title Cir/ Administrator Item Description: Administrator Reviewed: ^____________________ Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report ✓/ Appointment of Acting Police Chief Police Chief until a new Police Chief is appointed. It is also recommended that Lt cheswtck receive additional pay for the Acting Police Chiet duties. A general guideline for additional pay for serving in an "acting” role is that the [Kison should receive a tSliimum of 5% above current pay or the Hrst step of the pay range of 'he in which the person will be acting, which ever is greater. Ll. Cheswtck s pay rate is currently $22.18 per hour. Tlie first step of the Police Chief pay range is $24.32 per hour. The difference is $2.14 per hour or 9.6%. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Lt. Gary Cheswick as Acting Police Chief at a pay rate of $24.32 per hour. J City of Orono, Minnesota Hennepin County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended December 31, 1994 I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY Comprehenshe Annual Financial Report Year Ended December 31, 1994 Prepared by Department of Finance Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director TT THIS PACE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Repon Table cf Contents INT lODUCTORY SECTION CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER OFFICIALS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART rRANSMlTTAL LETTER CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT AWARD FINANCIAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (LIFTABLE STATEMENTS) Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups Combined Statement of Revenue. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Fund Combined Statement of Revenue. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) - General and Special Revenue Funds Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings - Proprietary Fund Type Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Fund Type Notes to Financial Statements COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS General Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Special Revenue Funds Ci)mbining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Park Fund Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Building Capital Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budeet and Actual (GAAP Basis) Exhibit Page 1 2 3-16 17 A-1 19 - 22 >123 - 24 A-3 25 - 26 A-4 27 A-5 28 - 29 -30 - 55 56 B-1 57 B-2 58 - 62 63 C-1 64 C-2 65 C-3 66 C-4 67 C-5 68 L IIII#I II THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK r W.. I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents (continued) I I I I I COMBINING AND INDIMDUAL FUND STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Enterprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue. Expenses, and Changes m Retained Earnings Combining Statement of Cash Fhms Water Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue. Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement ot Revenue. Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement ot Cash Flows Golf Course Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue. Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Trust and Agency Funds Combining Balance Sheet Comparative Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Flexible Benefit Plan Expendable Trust Fund Combining Statement of Changes in A.s.sets and Liabilities - Agency Funds FINANCIAL SCHEDULES Comparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by .Source Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Function and Activity Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets by Function and Activity Future Property Tax Levies to Retire Bonds Exhibit Page 69 D-1 70 - 7l D-2 72 - 73 74 E-1 75 - 76 E-2 77 - 7H 79 F-1 80 - 8I F-2 82 - 83 F-3 84 - 85 F-4 86 - 87 F 5 88 F-6 89 F-7 90 - 9l F-8 92 F-9 93 - 94 F-IO 9^ F-ll 96 F-12 97 98 G-1 99 G-2 lOO G3 lOl - 102 Schedule 1 103 1 104 3 10.5 4 106 I 1 % ?! • • THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK cm' OF ORONO, MINNESOTA ComprehcLsive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents (continued) Table Page STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) General Revenue by Source General Expenditures by Function Property Tax Levies and Collections Assessed V'aluc or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments Special Assessments Levies and Ci'llections Computation of I-egal Debt Margin Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt Revenue Bcmd Coverage - Enterprise Funds Demographic Statistics Property Value. Ctmstruction. and Bank Deposits Principal Taxpayers Miscellaneous Statistics Tax Capacity. Tax Levies, and Tax Extension Rates INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS Independent Auditor's Report on the Internal Control Structure Based on an Audit of the General Purpose Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Compliance Report Based on an Audit of the General Purpose Financial Statements Performed in .Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 107 - 108 109 - no 111-112 113 - 114 115 - 116 117 - 118 119 120 - 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 - 131 132 133 I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3If IP I I CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER OPHCIALS Year Ended December 31. 1994 Term of Office From To Citv Council Edward Callahan Mayor 1/1/93 12/31/94 J.Diann Goetten Councilmemher 1/1/91 12/31/94 Gabriel Jabbour Councilmemher 1/1/91 12/31/94 Charles Kelley Councilmemher 1/1/93 12/31/96 JoEllen Hurr Councilmemher 1/1/93 12/31/96 Citv Officials• Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director - Treasurer Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk -1- I CITY OF ORONO ORGANIZATIONAL CHART .1. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK V. GITYof ORONO Munkipal Offices PmI Office Box M Crysiy Mkinaoli 5S3i23«66 May 17, 1995 To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Oront) The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Or«mo for the fiscal ycai ending December 31, 1994 is hereby submitted. Re.sponsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in ail material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds and account groups of the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City ’s financial activities have been included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in four sections: Introductory. Financial. Statistical, and Internal Control Structure and Other Required Reports. The lntroductt>ry Section includes this transmittal letter, the City ’s organizational chart, a list of principal officials, and a copy of the GFOA Certificate of Achievement Award for the City ’s 1993 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Financial Section includes the general purpose financial statements, the combining and individual fund statements, financial schedules, and the Independent Auditor ’s Report on the general purpose financial statements. The Statistical Section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multi-year basis. The Internal Control Structure and Other Required Reports Section contains various Independent Auditor ’s report letters on internal control and legal compliance. All City funds and account groups, departments, commi.ssions. and other organizations for which the Mayor and City Council of the City of Orono are financially accountable are presented in the City of Orono ’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There are no other organizations that when considered would be included in the general purpose financial statements. The City provides a variety of municipal services. These include pt'lice protection, street maintenance, building inspection, planning and zoning, public improvements, general administrative services, public water and sewer utilities, and a municipal g('If course The City contracts tor fire protection fn>m the neighboring cities of Long Lake. Wayzata. Mound, and Maple Plain, and the City provides police protection and/'or building inspection services and/or animal control services ti' the cities of Long Lake. Spring Park, and Minnetonka Beach. 1 KI.KI’llOSK - 47.V7.\.S7 • VW - 47.M15I0 To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17, 1995 Economic C ondition and Outlook 1 I The City of Orono was incorporated effective January 1, 1955. The City is located on the nonhern shore of Lake Minnetonka about 15 miles west of Minneapolis. Of the City ’s 24.5 square miles of area, 50% is open water or marshland (with a total of 15.1 square miles of land area). Of Lake Minnetonka. 40% of the shoreline and 33% of the lake area is in Orono. The City of (3rono is a third ring suburb in the seven-county metropolitan Twin Cities area Minneapolis/St. Paul and is liKated on Lake Minnetonka, the tenth largest lake in Minnesota. Orono developed primarily because of this aesthetic amenity, which is the most heavily used recreational lake in the state. This heavy use is a result of the quality of its aesthetic appeal, together with its proximity to the metropolitan urban core. The City is primarily a residential community with a mixture of several t>pes of housing, and includes a small commercial district. Orono totally surrounds two ci>mtnunities. which are part of the original township, and substantially surrounds a third community. As indicated earlier, Orono c»«)perates with these cities for the most cost effective provision of City services. Orono is home to many of the metropolitan area’s top executives w ho appreciate the community ’s natural amenities. It is anticipated that the positive appeal of the community, together with the extent of available land, will see the community experiencing continued development for the next ten years. The City is in a strong financial position. Because of its strong residential tax ba.se. Orono continued in 1994 to have a tax capacity rate that is one of the lowest in the county for communities over l.CKX) in population, ranking sixth lowest of 38 communities. The strength of the City ’s financial condition is reflected in its bond rating of Aal since 1989. In 1994, the level of residential con.struction continued to strengthen. Building permit and plan review' fees significantly exceeded expected levels. Even with the uncertainty concerning the Highway 12 corridor kx:ation. the improvement in the economy generated sub.stantial new residential deveK'pment proposals in 1994. A 60-unit subdivision was approved in 1994. This will cause a substantial increase in the level of residential development in the City. C ooperatint ; Eftorts With Other Jlrisi )iction .s The City continues to pur.sue opportunities for reducing the cost of City services. In 1992, Orono joined with three other cities for the provision of pro.secution .services. This arrangement reduced the City ’s annual prosecution costs from a three-year average of approximately $100,000 to an annual fixed fee of $30,000. As indicated earlier, the City is involved in cooperative arrangements for both police and fire service. The City of Long Lake provides fire service to the majority of Orono. The City of Orono provides police .services to Long Lake. In 1993, the tsvo cities were able to agree to three-year contracts for both the police and fire services. This has increased the stability of this cooperative arrangement between the two cities. -4- ■I I i I I I I To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 The City Council has given conceptual approval to a joint project with Hennepin Parks to construct a bike/hike trail on Old Crystal Bay Road connecting two regional park facilities — the Luce Line Trail and Baker Park. This trail will also serve the new City facilities and the Orono school campus Funding for the trail will be shared equally between the City and Hennepin Parks. In response to the purchase of a residential lakeshore property by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for a proposed public boat launch, Orono took action to cause the DNR to rethink its priKedures related to the provision of public access. Orono urged the DNR to take a wider and longer range view of the provision of public access to prevent a piecemeal approach to the provision of public access. In response, the DNR stopped all activity related to the initial site and has purchased an existing marina for conversion to a public boat launch. This will provide for public access needs without expanding commercial uses on the lake and without forcing public boat launching facilities into the City's residential areas. This was an outstanding example of a cooperative effort between two governmental jurisdictions to find a mutually beneficial solution to a difficult problem. Orono is currently working in a cooperative effort with the cities of Long Lake and Medina and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to accomplish a major water quality imprmement project on Ltmg Lake, a lake contiguous to both the cities of Long Lake and Orono. This project is to be funded by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. A School Liaison Officer Program was initiated through a cooperative agreement with the school district. Through this program a police officer works with school administrative and counseling staff, and builds positive relationships with the students, to enable them to assist in addressing and preventing problems, and to assist in intersening with "at risk" students. This program is fully funded by the .school district. The City entered into a cot>perative arrangement with the .schot)! district and the Oron»i Baseball Association (OBA), a private organization that coordinates a youth baseball program, for the construction of two youth ba.seball fields. The school district provided the property through a lease to the City, and the OBA provided for the construction of the ball fields. The City's role was to coordinate the proce.ss and to contribute $20,000 toward the construction of the ball field. The City is currently involved with a group of 14 cities ItKated adjacent to Lake Minnetonka in an efbirt to identify new' opportunities for cooperative service delivery to enable improved .services and increa.sed efficiency. Water and Sewfk Fi nd Oi*frati (»ns In response to a very substantial increase in charges paid to the Metropolitan Waste Control Cc'mmission for sewer treatment, the City took action in 1993 to increase sewer rates by approximately 30% effective in 1994 to ensure that the Sewer Fund remains in solid financial condition. In conjunction w'ith the increased sewer rates, the City initiated a program to reduce the amount of ground water and stirmwater entering the .sanitary sewer sy.stem with the purpo.se of reducing sewage treatment co.sts. The program includes a sump pump inspection program to ensure that residential sump pumps are not discharging into the sanitary sewer system, and a manhole and lift .station sealing program. The initial goal of the program is to address tho.se problems that are both significant and relatively inexpensive to address. The savings generated by these efforts will then be put toward addressing the next level of problems. This program will be o..j,.'ing. -5- To the City Council a«l Citizens of tlw City of Orono May 17, 1995 The City also took action in 1993 to raise the water rates for 1994 by 20-30% to strengthen the financial condition of the Water Fund. The increased water rate.s will fund a three-year water plant rehabilitation project. This project will address maintenance and repair needs while upgrading the plant to meet projected water supply needs. 1 I I Labor Relations Labor relations are continuing on a positive path. In 1993, the police officers agreed to a two-year contract for 1993 and 1994 with wage increases of 2.75% for each of the two years. The police lieutenants agreed to the same wage increases, but did so through two one-year agreements versus a two- year agreement. .I iNFRASTRl'CTl'RE The City completed two tran.sportation infra.structure projects in 1994. These were the replacement of the bridge over the Burlington Nonhern Railroad on Old Crystal Bay Road, and the recon.struction of North Brown Road, a liKal collector roadw-ay. The majority of the funding for the bridge project came through a Federal Bridge Grant Program. The funding for the Brown Road Project was provided through the State Department of Transponation Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds which the City has been accumulating in anticipation of a multi-year roadway recon.struction plan. ^ t Park Planning The City conducted a Citizen Survey to obtain input regarding the future direction of the City ’s park system. The survey indicated overwhelming satisfaction with the City as a whole. It also pointed toward the preservation of open space and dcvehipment of a trail system as the two highest priorities for the City ’s park system. This information will be used as the basis for an update of the City ’s Park Master Plan. Highway 12 Cokkiimir The major east/w’e.st transponation route in Orono is State Highway 12. Orono ’s community management plan anticipates this corridor as Orono ’s commercial/industrial corridor, with the remainder of the City (with the exception of a small historical commercial area near Lake Minnetonka) maintaining a rural residential character. The Minnesota Department of Transportatiem (MNDOT) is currently in the process of planning for the future update of Highway 12. MNDOT has identified two new potential corridors for the upgraded Highway 12 in additiim to the existing corridor. Both of the new ciirridors wi^uld significantly impact the rural character of Orono. Orono has entered into a voluntary mediation process with MNDOT and a neighboring city to resolve issues related to the location of the Highway 12 corridor. This priKess has been very succe.ssful in a.ssi.sting the three parties to begin to focus on a corridor that meets the needs and addresses the co'^cerns of each party. -6- To Uw City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17, 1995 Financial Information The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of benefits likely to be derived, and the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. All internal control evaluations occur within this framework for the purpose of adequately safeguarding assets and providing reasonable assurance in the proper recording of financial transactions. The City maintains budgetary controls to aid in compliance with the annual budget as adopted by the City Council. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year for the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds. Budgetary control for Debt Service Funds is achieved through general obligation bond provisions. Budgetary control for Capital Project Funds is accomplished through the use of project controls. Budgetary control is maintained at the department level through the issuance of purchase orders. Expenditures are monitored during the year, and any recommended adjustments to the budget are presented to the Council for approval by City management. Unused appropriations lapse at year-end: however, the Council may approve carryover of specific items. The financial .statements and schema .> iru’ jded in the Financial Section of this report retlect the City ’s continued adherence to sound financial management. -7- To the City Coumril and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 General Government Funciions The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund. Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Serv’ice Funds revenue for the year ended December 31, 1994, and the amount and percentage of increases or decreases in relation to the prior year revenue. Revenue Amount Percent of Total Increase (Decrease) From 1993 Percent of Increa.se (Decrea.se) Property taxes S 1,922.775 45.42 %$104.022 5.72 % Special assessments 257.175 6.08 (168,233)(39.55) Licenses and permits 147,888 3.49 (18.009) (10.86) Intergovernmental 539,226 12.74 42.061 8.46 Charges for services 851,165 20.11 (14,869)(1.72) Fines and forfeits 58,158 1.37 (3,333)(5.42) Interest 286,435 6.77 32,381 12.75 Other revenue 170,500 4.02 98,552 136.98 $4.233,322 100.00%$72.572 1.74 % Taxes are the largest source of revenue, comprising 45.42%, an increase of 5.72%. The special assessments revenue decrease is due in part to the reduced amount of prepayments compared to the prior year and the naturally declining amount of interest on the remaining .special assessments principal balance. The decline in licenses and permits revenue of 10.86% is a re.sult of a decrea.se in the dollar value of the construction and remixleling permits applied for of approximately $4,500,000, although the number of building permits increased from 304 to 317. Intergovernmental revenues have increa.sed $42,061 in total. The municipal state aid for street maintenance increased $26,819; the state paid HACA (Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid) increa.sed $13,572; and the state aid for police increa.sed $3,912; while the recycling grant from the county decrea.sed $1,214; and other miscellaneous grants and aids decreased $1,028. The charges for services revenue decreased $14,869 in total. There were increases in the recycling program fee of $2,642 and in the administrative charges to other funds of $6,058. However, those revenue increases were oftsct by decreases in the variance, subdivision, conditional use. and plan check/site exam fees of $6,751; decrea.sed police .service contract charges of $15,850; and decrea.sed other charges for services of $968. The tines revenue decreased for the sixth consecutive year. The interest revenue increased 12.75% over the prior year, reflecting an overall interest rate increase from the prior year. Other revenue increa.sed $98,552 from the prior year due primarily to an increase in park dedication fees of $98,142. Other miscellaneous items comprise the remaining increa.se of $410. I -8- I I I To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Funds expenditures for the year ended December 31, 1994, and the amount and percentage of increases or decreases in relation to the prior year expenditures. For purposes of this analysis, current and capital outlay are combined by function. Expenditures Amount Percent of Total Increase (Decrease) From 1993 Percent of lncrea.se (Decrea.se) Currem and capital outlay General government $ 701,681 16 07%$44,126 6.71 % Public safety 1,660,901 40 ; 5 46.235 2.86 Streets 583,636 14.li 87,653 17.67 Parks and recreation 79,309 1.9:8,259 11.62 Recycling 72,137 1.74 (13,256)(15.52) Miscellaneous 99,592 2.41 32.438 48.30 1 Debt service I Principal 550,000 13.30 400,000 266.67 1 Interest and other charges 388.991 9.40 (23,263)(5.64) $ 4.136,247 100.00%$582.192 16 .38 % The increa.se in general government expenditures is a result of an administration department increa.se of $10,374, primarily for personnel services; elections department increases of $8,171 in the areas of personal services and supplies, as 1994 was an election year; finance department increases of S4.895 for personal services and data processing co.sts; legal department increa.ses of $22,380 for retainer, consulting, and jail charges; and government buildings increases of $6,279 comprised of an increase of $31,599 for building capital costs offset by decrea.sed personal .serv'ices costs, maintenance co.sts. and insurance costs of $25,320. The foregoing increases were offset by reductions of $7,147 in the mayor and council department due to decreased membership expenditures; reductiims of $600 in the a.s.sessing department for personal services and supplies, offset by an increase in contracted assessing services and reductions of $226 in the human serv’ices department for memberships. The overall increase in public safety expenditures of $46.2.^5 is from a combination of the following: the police department had an iwerall increase of $19,032 as a result of increases in personal services of $16,842. supplies increa.ses of $5,257. while contract services decreased $2,562, and capital outlay was reduced by $505. The fire department contracted service co.sts increased $4,485 between the four communities providing fire protection to the City. Within the inspection and zoning department, the total increase was $19,090; personal .services increased $9,041, contract services and charges increased $459. capital outlay increa.sed $10,516. while supplies costs decreased $926. The emergency preparedness department experienced an overall increa.se of $63. with increa.sed supplies costs of $233. and decrea.sed contract services and charges of $170. The animal control department total increa.se was $3,565; persimal services increased $2,220; supplies increased $202; and other services and charges increa.sed $1,143. The street department expenditures increased m total by $87,653 due t(* increases in personal services of $8,476. other services and charges of $89,643, and capital outlay of $98,145. The.se increases were offset by decrea.ses in supplies costs of $108.611. -9- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 The parks and recreation department expenditures increased $8,259 in total due to increases in capital outlay of $10,600 and other services and charges of $9,208. These increases were offset hy reduced personal services of $9,763. and reduced supplies of $1,786. The recycling department expenditures decreased $13,256 in total due to decreased personal .serv ices of $4,449, and other services and charges of $9,674, which were offset by increased .supplies of $867. Within the miscellaneous expenditures area, the engineering fees increased $10,023; the special services for consulting and police increased $19,596, while the contingency and special project expenditures decreased $5,631. Within the debt service, the principal paid increased $400,000 due to the call of the Improvement Bonds of 1980, which included $150,000 of unscheduled principal payments in addition to the scheduled principal payments. The interest and other charges decreased $23,263 due to the reduced outstanding principal balance, but included $1,500 of call premium. Fund Balances General F i'ni) The undesignated fund balance of the General Fund increa.sed from $1,096,631 at December 31, 1993. to $1,248,592 at December 31, 1994. or 13.9%. The 1994 ending undesignated fund balance provides 38.5% coverage of the 1995 adopted budget of $3,245,015. S pecial Rfatnue F und.s Special Revenue Fund.s are u.scd to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes, including current operating expenses and capital outlay. Park F und The Park Fund was created by Ordinance of the City Council to receive contributi»>ns for .subdivisions in lieu of conveyance or dedication of land for parks, playgrounds, and other public purposes. Such contributions, termed park dedication fees, are to be used for the acquisition, development, or maintenance of public parks, playgrounds, surface water holding areas (ponding areas), and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes. The fund balance as of December 31, 1994 was $304,698. iMrROVLMENT AND EOl lPMF.NT CAPITAL OlTI.AY Ft ND The Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund was established to provide a source of funds for equipment purchases and improvements. The fund was established by a transfer from the General Fund and is maintained by annual budgeted transfers from the General Fund, by investment earnings, and by u.ser charges to participating departments for certain office -10- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17, 1995 equipment. Expenditures are for non-Enterprise Fund purposes. The fund balance as of Dumber 31, 1994 was $344,612. Hinij>iNn C apital Outlay Fund Tl» Building Capital Outlay Fund was established to receive annual budgeted transfers from the General Fund for the purpose of reducing the need for future bonding of non-Enterprise building facilities. The 1991 Public Facilities Capital Project Fund received several advances from the Building Capital Outlay Fund. As an offset to these transfers, proceeds from land sold to reduce the project costs were deposited in the Building Capital Outlay Fund. The City Council has determined that investment earnings of the Building Capital Outlay Fund will be used to panially pay the debt service of the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds. The Building Capital Outlay Fund balance at December 31, 1994 was $2,476,441. D ebt Service Funds Debt Service Funds are used to account for the current year payment of matured principal and interest on long-term general bonded debt. Sources available for payment of the debt .service are primarily provided by special assessments and property taxes. On March 1. 1994, the City called in the remaining out.standing bonds totaling $150,000. due in 1995 and 1996, for redemption at 101% of par. plus accrued interest. These bonds were part of the $1,100,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds dated December 1, 1980. The combined fund balance for all Debt Service Funds as of December 31, 1994 was $1,354,259. a dec. ease of 16.4% from 1993. C apital Project Fund .s Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to he used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities Minnksota Statk-Aii) SiKi kts C onstkcchon Find The Minnesota .State-Aid Streets Construction Fund is used to account for state-aid construction revenue and the use of that revenue for improvements to thoroughfare roads within the City. The fund balance as of December 31, 1994 was $41,837. an increa.se of $42,674 from the prior year. -II- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 Permanent Improvement R evo «.ving Fund The Pennanent Improvement Revolving Fund provides financing for construction costs prior to obtaining permanent financing or levying of assessments against benefitted propenies for those projects funded directly. Within this fund there is also an account for major road and bridge repairs, construction, or maintenance. The fund balance as of December 31, 1994 was $508,806. an increase of $23,565 from 1993. The 1988 street and storm sewer improvement costs are to be funded from dedicated Minnesota State-Aid (MSA) Streets Construction Fund revenue and from General Fund revenue. Approximately $110,000 and $34,000 will be funded from future MSA and General Fund revenue, respectively. 1991 Public FACiLmE<; Construction Fund The 1991 Public Facilities Construction Fund was created to account for the bond prtKeeds of $3,550,000 from the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds and the costs of land acquisition and construction of the public facilities project consisting of a City meeting hall. City offices, police offices, and detention/proce.ssing, public works offices, storage, mainienance and repair of machinery and equipment space, and a cold storage building. This fund was closed during 1994. 1992 Stl^bbs Bay Sewtr Constriction Fi»nt > The 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Fund was created to account for the maji'rity of the $2,000,000 in bond proceeds from the 1992 Improvement Bonds and the costs of construction of the 1992 Stubbs Bay area sanitary sewer project consisting of sewer mains, laterals, and lift stations necessary to provide sewer to the Stubbs Bay area. The fund balance at December 31. 1994 w as $182,083. Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds are used to account for financial resources used in providing self-supporting public- services in which most of the costs involved are paid in the form of cnarges by the u.sers of the services. Except for ownership, Enterpri.se Funds bear a clo.se re.semblance to privately-owned utility or service enterprises. The City owns and operates a water utility, sewer utility, and a public golf course. -12- i ! !f i_* 1 I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17, 1995 Water Operatinc ; Fund The Water Operating Fund accounts for the provision of water services to the residents of the City who have water service available. All activities necessary to provide such service.^ are accounted for in this fund, including administration, operations, maintenance, billing, and collection. The summary of r^rations for 1994 and 1993 is as folh>ws: December 31 1994 1993 Operating revenue Operating expenses $ 202,446 $ 155.126 231.518 198,527 Operating loss $ (29.072) $ (43.401) The operating loss for 1994 docs not include nonoperating revenue of $40,975 or nonoperating expenses of $64,691. The operating loss for 1993 also does not include nonoperating revenue of $10,252 or nonoperating expen.ses of $70,143. Retained earnings as of December 31. 1994 were $158,5%, which represents a decrease of $17,915 from 1993, net of the effects of depreciation on contributed as.sets. nonoperating items, and transfers in. During 1994, the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund transferred $71,483 of residual equity to the Water Operating Fund to assist in financing the revenue bond debt. Sewer Operattnc , Fi^t> The Sewer Operating Fund accounts for the provision of sewer services to the residents of the City who have sanitary sewer service available. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including administration, operatitms. maintenance, billing, and collection. The summary' of operations for 1994 and 1993 is as follows: December 31 Operating revenue Operating expenses Operating loss 1994 1993 $556.360 $441.2.55 647,610 6.55.835 $(91.2.50)$(214.580) The operating loss for 1994 does not include nonoperating revenue of $151,670 or nonoperating expenses of $63,160 The operating loss for 1993 also does not include nonoperating revenue of $116,744 or nonoperating expen.ses of $68,531. Retained earnings as of December 31. 1994 were $1,684,078. which represents an increase of $119.015 from 1993. net of the effects of depreciation on contributed as.sets. nonoperating items, and transfers in. -13- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 Golf C oihsf: Operating Fltnd The Golf Course Operating Fund accounts for the q>eration of the City-owned and operated gidf course sales and expenses necessary to provide this service. The summary of operations for 1994 and 1993 is as follows: December 31 Operating expenses Operating income 1994 1993 $178.283 $142.370 130.461 123.616 $47.822 $18.754 The operating income for 1994 does not include nonoperating revenue of $5,582 or nonoperating expense of $8,774. The operating income for 1993 also does not include nonoperating revenue of $4,581. Retained earnings as of December 31. 1994 were $215,257. which represents an increase of $44,884 from 1993. net of the effects of depreciation on contributed assets and nonoperating items. Debt A dministration At December 31. 1994. the City had six bond issues outstanding. The City's legal debt limitation, based on state statutes, equals 2% of market value. All City bonded debt at December 31. 1994 is special assessment or revenue funded and therefore is excluded from the limit. The City bond rating from Moixly ’s Investors Service is Aal for all bimd issues except the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bond which has a bond rating from Moody's Investors Ser\ ice of Aa. I C ash Manageme .nt Cash temporarily idle during the year was invested in demand deposits, money market funds. obligati«'ns of federal agencies, the U.S. Treasury, obligations of IcK'al governmental units, the State of Minnesota, repurchase agreements, bankers' acceptances, and commercial paper. The City's investment t>bjeciive as stated in the investment policy is to first ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio, second to maximize yield while matching maturity dates with expenditure needs, and third to diversify the investment portfolio by financial institution, government agency, or by the corporation in the case of commercial paper to reduce the exposure to risk of loss. At December 31. 1994, the City had an investment portfolio of $7,779,408. at cost, (exclusive of the assets held by deferred compensation trustees), diversified as shown in the following table: -14- I To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17. 1995 Type of Investment Cost Percent Investment Pool - Money Market Funds $59.927 0.77% Certificates of Deposit 190,000 2.44 U.S. Federal Agencies 6.630.543 85.23 U.S. Treasury Obligations 398.938 5.13 City of Goodview, Minnesota 50,000 0.64 State of Minnesota 450.000 5.79 $ 7.779.408 100.00% For the year ended December 31, 1994, the City had cash and investment interest earnings of $425,484. at an average yield of 5.763%. R isk Management The City participates in the liability, propeny. and workers’ compensation programs spi'nsored by the League of Minnesota Cities In.surance Tru.st. In addition, the City appoints an agent of lecord to assist with the administration, loss prevention, and risk management. Other Information In DKPKNDKNT AlDIT Minnesota State Statutes require that the City have an annual audit performed by a certified public accountant or the State Auditor. The City appointed the certified public accounting firm of Malloy. Montague, Karnowski. Radosevich & Co.. P.A.. to perform the audit for the year ended December 31. 1994. The Independent Auditor’s Report on the general purpose financial statements is included in the Financial Section of this report. A ward The Government Finance Officers’ Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31. 1993. This was the seventh consecutive year that the City received this pre.stigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City published an easily readable and efficiently organized Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This report satisfied both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year i»nly. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and w-e are submitting it to the GFO.A to determine its eligibility for another certificate. -15- To the City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono May 17, 1995 Acknowledge ^ients We would like to express our appreciation to the entire City staff for their individual contributitms in assisting with the preparation of this report and to the outside agencies who assisted with essential information for this report. We also would like to express appreciation to the Mayor and City Councilmembers for their interest and suppon in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse Administrator Af. Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director -16- Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Orono, Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31. 1993 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting President Executive Director -17- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK KJ fU u 0 U 1 I I I I H<^PRINCIPALS __ KENNETH VV MAI .OY. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KARNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A RADOSEVICH CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota I We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31. 1994, as listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our re.sponsibility is to expre.ss an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Thi^se standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant e.stimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general purpo.se financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Orono at December 31, 1994. and the results of its operations and cash flows of the proprietary fund type for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpo.se financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund statements and financial schedules as listed in the table of contents are presented for purpo.ses of additional analysis and are not a required part t»f the general purpose financial statements Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpo.se financial statements and. in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information as listed in the table of contents are not necessary for a fair presentation of the general purpose financial .statements, but are presented as additi(*nal analytical data. This information is unaudited and we do not expre.ss an opinion on it. Mav 17. 1995 cenririKor»ooL.ic ACCOUNT ANTS laAT|i>f4Al HllllIMM* « WAt/AIA HtMll I VAH|» MINNI H tS MINNI V)fA MtfrntoNI »4'i Ml,’I f( ( I I A* fi',’ *>4'* tl'rf.M -18- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK L L I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Ccunbined Balance Sheet An Fund T>-pes and Account Groups As of December 31,1994 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31.1993) Assets and Other Debits Assets Cash and temporary investments Cash and investments held by trustee Receivables Accounts Accrued interest Delinquent taxes Delinquent special assessments Dcfened special assessments Contract for deed Due from other funds Advances to other funds Due from other governmental units Inventories Prepaid items Deferred charges Discount on revenue bonds Other assets Restricted assets (ash and temporary investments Accrued interest I*roperty, plant, and equipment - net CXhcr debits Amount available in Debt Service Funds (jeneral Fund (or vested vacation and severance Kmefits Amount to be provided for debt service Total assets and other debits See notes to financial statements Governmental Fund Types CJencral Special Revenue Debt Serv'ice 14,721 84,638 70.4(i4 5.195 13,358 10,043 100,829 34.502 18.455 2 040 -19- 121.529 34,309 10,281 25.944 882.170 18,455 Capital Project $ 1,344,283 $ 3,012.789 $ 1.316.740 $939.791 43,449 1,399 48,572 i ^ 2,287,899. $ 1,033,^>> 1 i II I I I Proprielafy Fund Type Enterprise 274,694 36.299 1.051 22,621 41.556 300.451 3.599 31.571 11.941 806.734 30.258 6,722.031 Fiduciaryf Fund Tvpe Trust and Agency $ 1,067,213 $ Account Groups General Fixed Assets General Long-Term Debt -$ 616,600 -$ 5.748.055 1,354.259 137.421 4,890,741 Exhibit A-1 Totals (Memorandum Only) 1994 1993 $ 7.680.816 $7.242.770 616,600 511.742 289.415 320.224 81.796 55.159 972.298 13.358 18.455 10.043 401.280 3.599 66,073 18.455 11.941 2.040 215.230 207.417 123.136 70.077 1.207.001 19.072 23.031 22.981 355.536 4,086 23.031 13.402 3,648 806.734 30,258 12.470.086 1,296.007 18.725 12.376.895 1,354.259 1.619.202 137,421 4.890.741 129.946 5.175.798 S 9,150J)J^ $ 616.600 S_,.^748,(L55 $ 6,382^2J_^ (continued) -20- cnr OF ORONO, Minnesota Combined Balance Sheet All Fund Types and Account Groups (continued) As of December 31,1994 (with Cewnparative Totals as of December 31, 1993) General 267,970 Liabilities, Equity, and Other Qedits Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable S 75,535 Accrued salaries and compensated absences payable 62,902 Due to other funds 18,455 Advances from other funds - Due to other governmental units 46,055 Deferred credits - Deferred revenue 65,023 Deferred compensation payable to employees Liabilities related to restricted assets Accrued interest payable - Deferred developer advances — Long-term debt ^ Total liabilities Equity and other credits Investment in general fixed assets - Contributed capital — RetaLred earnings Reserved lor revenue bond debt service - Unreserved - Fund balance Reserved for prepaid items 34.502 F csers ed for advances to other funds 10,043 Unreserved Designated for road.'bridge projects - Designated for emergency contingencies - Designated for construction - Designated for capital outlay - Designated for debt service - Designated for vacation'severance benefits 137,421 Undesignated 1,248,592 Total equity and other credits 1,430,558 Governmental Fund T\pes Special Revenue Debt Service 932,537 8,567 933,640 3,125,751 3,125,751 1,354,259 1,354,259 See notes to financial statements -21- Capital Project 8,567 $1,103 $240,489 10,043 49,953 300,485 320,969 187,837 223,920 732,726 Total liabilities, equity, and other credits 3'„lj6?8,528 $ 3^134,31^ $ 2,287,899 j 1,033,211 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Proprietary Fund Tvpe Enterprise 52,094 89,800 1,950,000 2,249,620 5,042,468 2,057.931 7,100,399 Fiduciary Fund Type Trust and Agency 9,594 $ 33,247 2,876 112,009 616,600 616,600 Account Groups General Fixed Assets General Lang-Term Debt -$-S 6,382.421 6.382.421 5.748.055 5.748.055 Exhibit A-1 Totals (Memorandum Only) 1994 1993 335,288 96.149 18,455 10,043 48,931 112,009 1,047,513 616,600 52,094 89,800 8,332,421 10,759,303 5,748,055 5.042.468 2.057.931 34,502 10,043 320,969 187,837 3,125,751 1,354,259 137,421 1.472,512 19,491,748 $ 179,069 108,500 23.031 22,981 44,292 121,540 1.279.242 511,742 56,589 89,800 9,049,946 11,486;732 5,532.210 5,127,867 73,166 1,838,781 22,981 409,326 465,311 3.015.873 1.619,202 129.946 937,338 19.172.001 $ 9,.350,0J_9_ ^ ^16,60^ $ A748^055 S j(),25j.O .^S ..3J),6.M<J3-^ -22- i CITY OF ORONO. ^^lNNESOT A Combmed J^iatcmcnt of Revenue. Expenditures, and Ch^ges in Fund Balance All Ciovcmmenlal Fund T>’pes and Expendable Trust Ftind Year Ended December 31. 1994 Revenue IVoperty taxes Special assessments Licenses and pennits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeits Other Interest earned on investments Rents and refunds Miscellaneous Total revenue Expenditures Current Cjcneral government Public safety Streets Parks and recreation Recycling Miscellaneous Capital outlay Debt serv ice Principal retirement Interest Fiscal agent fees and other Total expenditures Excess (deficiencv) of revenue over expenditures exher financing sources (uses) Proceeds from sale of land and i'‘lher Operating transfers in 0|x*rating transfers (out) lotal other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expen ditures and other financing uses Fund balance Beginning of year Residual equity transfer (out) lind of vear See notes to financial statements IKl.(KK)KW.X7« Ended December 31. 1993) Governmental Fund Tvpcs General Special Revenue Debt Service Capital fti’ject $ 1.645.1.33 $$277.642 $230 624 —256.551 17,768 147.888 --- 494.619 —44.607 683.814 851.165 —-- 58,158 ——- 49.065 168.336 69.034 41.615 32.680 -—- 4.263 131,373 2.184 16.284 3.283.595 299.709 650.018 759.711 667.018 1.616.087 --- 485.491 --- 55.739 —-- 72.1.37 --- 91.142 8,4.50 -- .30.081 171,111 -741,986 5^0.(K )0 ---379.635 - --9.356 - .3.017.695 179.561 9.38.991 741.986 265.900 120.148 (288.973)17.725 _ —174.900 95,513 - (84.900)(185.170)-(343) (84,U00)(10.270)95.513 (.343) I7.3s: 1.249.558 .3.015.87.3 1.M9.202 715.344 ___________________^___(71.4 83) ______^ S 1.430.558 S 3.125.751 S 1.354.250 S 732.72(> 1I I I I I I v.i -23- j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit A-2 Fiduciary Fund Type Expendable Totals (Memoranduni Only) Trust Fund 1994 1993 $$1.92.T005 $l.R 18.7.5.7 —274.')45 448.721 —147.888 165.897 —1.22.7.040 498.455 —851.165 866.0.74 -58.158 61.491 .728.050 ■IT) S')-) —32,^80 22.84^ 51.491 205.595 12.5.411 51.491 5.044.524 4.329.8.74 667.018 656.845 —1.616.087 1.579.863 —48.5.491 495.983 —5.5.7.79 58.080 —72.1.77 85..79.7 51,491 151.08.7 127.984 -94.7.178 682.387 550.0(«)150.(HMI —.779.6.75 40.7.291 —9..756 8.96.7 51.491 4.929.724 4.548.789 -114.800 (218.955; .290.179 —270.41.7 813.688 —(270.41.7)(1.054.688 --49.179 —114.8(KI (169.776 .6.599.977 ().769.753 -(71.48.7)- S S 6.64.7.294 S 6.599.'^77 -24- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) General and Special Revenue Funds Year Ended December 31, 1994 General Fund Fund balance Beginning of year End of year Sec notes to financial statements 1.249,5 5S $ 1.430.5 58 -25- Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Revenue Property taxes $ 1,633.165 $ 1,645,133 $11.968 Special assessments —624 624 Licenses and permits 122,000 147,888 25,888 Intergovernmental 457.563 494,619 37,056 Charges for services 809,453 851,165 41,712 Fines and forfeits 66.000 58,158 (7,842) Olher Interest earned on investments 30,000 49,065 19,065 Rents and refunds 17,200 32.680 15,480 Miscellaneous 4,200 4.263 63 Total revenue 3,139,581 3,283,595 144,014 Expenditures Current General government 690,163 667,018 (23,145) Public safety 1,624,180 1,616,087 (8,093) Streets 486.045 485,491 (554) Parks and recreation 55,740 55,739 (I) Recycling 86,483 72,137 (14,346) Miscellaneous 91,155 91,142 (13) Capital outlay 34,000 30.081 Total expenditures 3.067,766 3,017,695 (50,071) Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 71,815 265,900 194,085 Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in 13,085 —(13,085) Operating transfers (out)(84,900)— Total other financing sources (uses)(71.815)(84,900) (13,085) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expen- ditures and other financing uses $____________-181,000 $ 181,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ............. Exhiba A-3 Special Revenue Funds Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget $$$ mt, 101,550 168,336 66,786 13,650 131,373 117,723 115,200 299.709 184,509 8,450 8,450 - 189,184 171.111 (18.07^ 197,634 179,561 (18.073) (82,434)120.148 202,582 174,900 174,900 (185,170)(185,170)— (10,270)(10,270)— $__(9 2,70 4)109,878 $ 202,582 3,015,873 $ 3,12 5,751 -26- CITY OF OROm. MINNESOTA Exhibit A-4 Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Prcprielaiy Fund T vt ^ Years Ended December 31.1*9^4 and 1993 See notes to financial slalcnicnls -27- Enienrise Funds 1994 1993 Sales and cost of sales Sales S 16.158 S 142'51 Cost of sales 7J109 8.601 Gross profit 8J149 5.750 operating revenue Metered water sales 1W.2(18 151.798 User charges 544.471 397.993 Great fees 13().5.12 112.308 Equipment rental .31.594 23.751 Other 16.935 47.151 Total q^eraling revenue 928.740 733,001 Total gross pn)fil and operating a venue 937,089 738.751 Operating expenses Personal serv ices 263.931 246,470 Purchased water 6.985 11,635 Sewer disposal charges 282.592 293.536 Professional sen ices 11.716 12.868 Operating and maintenance supplies 20^363 19.866 Heat, light, and pemer 45.812 46.630 Deprecialkin 2172120 202,58“’ Rent and equipment 72136 7.194 Maintenance and rcpaiis 50.588 43.692 Administrative and other expense 91.520 88,744 C3lher expenses 11.426 4,80^> Total operating expenses 1.009.589 977.978 Operating loss (72.500)(2.39.227) Nc’tnoperating revenue (expense) Pn^perty tax revenue 67.576 — Interest income 121.121 122.047 Amortization of deferred credils 9J1.30 9.5.30 Interest expense (127.416)(138.255) Revenue bond expense (435)(419) Loss on sale of assets (8.774)— Total nonoperating revenue (expense)61.602 (7.0*)?) D>ss before operating transfers (10,898)(24(..324) Operating transters in -261.088 Operating transfers (out)—(20.088) lotal (’peralmg transfers in (t>ul)241.CKX) Net li^ss (10.898)(5.324) Credit for depreciation on ci^itrilxjted assets 156.882 156.488 Increase in retained earnings 145,984 151.164 Retained earnings Beginning of year 1.911.947 1.76D.783 lind of Year S 2.057.931 S 1.911.947 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit A-5 OlY OF GROm, MINNESOTA Statement of Cash Flows PR^prietar}’ Fund Tn^c Years Ended December 31.1994 and 1993 Enterprise Funds 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities Opoating loss $ (72.500)$ (239.227) Adjustments to reamcile operating loss to nei cash provided (used) by operating activities Dqreciation 217,320 202,587 Amortization of revalue bond disrount 1.461 1.513 Change in assets and liabilities (Inaease) decrease in Accounts receivable (69.255)7,943 Due fh>m other governmental units (846)1.817 Inventory 487 (62) Prepaid items (31,571)— Increase (decrease) in Compensated absences 2.096 (150) Aewunts payable (7,487)(6,790) Acaiunts pa>’able - restricted —(2.001) Contracts payable — restricted —(129.090) Salaries payable 1,405 346 Due to other govemmenutl units 2.627 (8,286) Net aish prin ided (used) by operating activities 43.737 (171.4(K)) Cash flows from noncapiui! financing activities Operating transfers in —261.088 Ojxrating transfers (out)—(20.088) Net aish provided bv noncapital activities —241.000 Cash flows fri^m capital and related financing activities Residual equity transfer 71,483 - Taxes collected for revenue Kmd debt 66.525 — Special assessments for revenue bond debt 61.998 47.803 Acquisition or construction o. '1 assets (103.440)(77.854) MWee current value credit 35.569 35.347 Principal paid on revenue Kmus (175.000)(175.000) Interest piid on revenue bonds (131.911)(142.726) Other charges on revenue bonds (435J __m Net cash used by aipiuil and related financing activities (175.211)(312.849) See notes to financial sUitcnicnts (continued) -28- ExhrbitA-5 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA . latcment of Cash Flows Proprietary Fund Type (continued) Years Ended Decem^*er 31,1994 and 1993 Enterprise Funds Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year End of year Cash and cash equivalents Unrestricted cash and tempi^rary investments Restricted cash and temporary investments Total cash and cash equis alents Noncash operating items (golf aiurse) 1994 1993 67.707 119.031 (63.767)(124.218) 1.937,714 2.061,932 $ 1,873,947 $ 1.937.714 $ 1.067.213 806,734 $ 1,054.842 882.872 $ 1.873.947 $ 1.937.714 During the year ended December 31.1994, the City traded in equipment with an adjusted book value of $10,074. Equipment (>igin:il price Accumulated depreciation Adjusted lxx>k value Less trade-in value $16.794 6.720 10,074 (1,300) Loss on salt of equipment $8.774 See notes to tlnanci.al statements -29- I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Notes to Financial Statements D«:cmber 31. 1994 NOTE I - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A.Organization The City operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in the State of Minnesina Statutes. Under this plan, the City Council, composed of an elected mayi^r and four elected irustees ir councilmembers. exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The CuV Administrator, appointed by the Counril, is responsible for the proper administering of all affairs relating to the City. The financial statements and the accounting policies of the City .onform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governmental units. B.Reporting Entity As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the.se financial statements include the City of Orono (the pr.mary government) and its component unit. A component unit is a legally separate entity for which the primary government is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements I'f the primary government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable fi'r a component >.nit include w’hether or not the primary government appi-ints the voting majority of the potential coniponem unit’s board, i.s able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial btn-fit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. The Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is a legally separate organization created in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 469.003. Its purpose is to cleat and redevelop blighted areas within the City and to provide adequate hou.sing for low and mi’derate income residents. The HRA is fiscally dependent upon the City of Oriino, and its governing board consists of the City ’s mayor and councilmembers. Therefore, the HRA has been reported as a blended component unit of the City, w'ith its hinds reported a.s though they are funds of the City. There are no other organizations that when considered would be included in the financial .%tatements as a component unit. C.Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account group*^. each of w hich is cimsidered a separate accounting entity. The City maintains the following funds, grouped by fund type and account group. -30- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE I - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINLTD) 1.GoTOiimental Fund Types a.General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating tund of the City. It is used to acccHint for all fmarcial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. b.Special Revenue Funds - The Special Rr enue Funds are used to account b'r the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than expendable trusts or major capital projects) that are restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. c.Debt Service Funds - The Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for. and the payment of. bonded general long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs. d. Capital Project Funds - The Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds). 2.Proprietary Fund Type a.Enterprise Funds - The Enterprise IW-* used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar* *-ivatc busines.A enterprises — where the intent of the governing body is that the costs of r iding goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. 3.Fiduciary Fund Type a.Expendable Trust Fund - The Expendable Trust Fund is used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. The Expendable Tru.st Fund includes the City ’s tlexibie benefit plan (Internal Revenue Code <i| 125). b.Agency Funds - The Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in the capacity of agent. These funds are used for the City ’s deferred compensation plan (Internal Revenue Code § 457). 4.Account Groups a.General Fixed Assets - This separate account group contains the fixed a.s.sets of the governmental fund types. b.General Long-Term Debt - This account group contains the long-term obligations of the City, other than those liabilities included in the Proprietary Funds. -31- ( I I I J J I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) D.Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus and its basis of accounting. Measurement Focus The measurement focus of a fund determines what the fund measures. All governmental funds and the Expendable Trust Fund are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement fix:us. With this measurement fiKUS, only current a.ssets and current liabilities generally are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present increases (revenue and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and inher financing uses) in net current assets. Proprietary Funds are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus. With this measurement fiKUS, all as.sets and liabilities assiKiated with the ope'^ation of these funds are included on the balance sheet. Fund equity (net total assets) is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings components. Proprietary fund type operating statements present increases (revenues) and decrea.ses (expen.ses) in net total assets. Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of re.sults of operations. Fixed assets used in governmental fund type operations and long-term liabilities expected to be financed from governmental funds are accounted for in two account gr*)ups. as they are concerned only with the measurement of financial position, and are not involved with mea.surement of results of operations. Basis of Accounting A fund\s basis of accounting determines when a transaction or event is recognized in the fund’s operating statement. The modified accrual basis of accounting is used by all governmental fund types. Expendable Trust Funds, and Agency Funds. Under this basis of accounting, transactiims are recorded in the following manner: -32- n CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE I - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) i.Revalue Recognition - Revxnue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period cr soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Major revenue that is susceptible to accrual includes propeny taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, and interest earned on investments. Other revenue that is not susceptible to accrual includes licenses and permits, fees, and miscellaneous revenue. Such revenue is recorded only when received because it is mn measurable until collected. 2.Recording of Expenditures - Expenditures are recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on general long-term debt which is reci'gnized when due. Proprietary Funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Under this methtHl. revenues are recognized when earned and expen.ses are recognized when they are incurred. The City applies all applicable pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in accounting and reporting for its proprietary operations. E.Cash and Investments Cash and temporary investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in various securities authorized by state law’. Earnings on pooled investments are alliKated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund. Cash and investments held by trustee include balances held in segregated accounts that are established for the deferred compensation plan payable to employees. Certain proceeds of the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bond and the Enterpri.se Fund Revenue Bonds, as well as certain res(,v.rces set aside, are classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because their use is limited by applicable bond covenants. Investments are stated at cost. Assets held by deferred compensation trustees are carried at market value. F.Property Taxes Property tax levies are set up by the City Council in October of each year, and are certified to Hennepin County for c»)Ilection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all property taxes. A portion of the propeny taxes levied is paid by the State of Minnesota ‘hrough Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA), which is included in intergovernmental revenue in the financial statements. -33- I I I J I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 1 - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) The county spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City on that date. Revenue is accrued and recognized in the year collectible. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable. Revenue from property taxes which is not collected within 60 days of year-end is deferred since it is not available to meet obligations of the current year. Property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. The county provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts several times a year. G.Special Assessments Special assessments represent the financing for public improvements paid for by benefming property owners. These assessments are recorded as receivables upon certification to the county. The corresponding revenue from the delinquent (unremitted) and deferred (cenified but not yet levied) .special assessments receivable is deferred until the year in which it becomes available (cc'llected within 60 days of year-end). H.Inventories Inventories are stated at the low er of cost or market on the fir.st-in. first-out basis and are acc»>unted tor using the consumption meth(Kl. I.Property, Plant, and Equipment Fixed assets are stated at cost, estimated hi.storical cost, or in the ca.se of contributions, at fair market value at the time received 1.General F'xed Assets .Account Group - No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. The costs of property, plant, and equipment are accounted for as current expenditures of the governmental fund types in the year purcha.sed. The City has elected not to record infrastructure fixed assets in its accounting records. 2.Proprietary Fund Type - Fixed assets of the Proprietary Funds are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows: Buildings and improvements Equipment Distrihution/collection svstem 25-50 years 3-20 years 10-75 years Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations is clo.sed to the contributed equity account. I -34- CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) J.Liability for Compensated Absences Vacation and sick leave expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources is reponed as an expenditure and a ^nd liability of the governmental fund type that will pay it. The remaining porti on of such obligations is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. The unused vacation of the Proprietary Funds is included in accrued liabilities of the respective fund. K.Bond Discounts'lssuance Costs In the go\cmmental fund types, bond discounts and issuance costs are recognized in the current periixl. Bond discfnints and issuance costs in the Enterprise Funds are deferred and amonized over the term of the bonds using the bonds outstanding meth(x] which approximates the effective interest rate method. L.Budgets and Budgetary Accounting Each fall, after holding a meeting to obtain public comments, the City Council legally adopts the General Fund and all of the Special Revenue Funds* budget for the following fi.scal year beginning January 1. These budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The City has established budgetary control at the department level City management must request Council approval before exceeding the budget at that level City management may transfer apprtipriations within the department level without Council approval. Appropriations lapse at year-end; however, the Council may approve the carryover of specific amounts. Budget amounts are presented on a modified accrual basis of accounting and include .several amendments adopted by the City Council during the year. Encumbrance accounting is not used. During the year, the City made significant budget amendments to the General Fund appropriations and the Special Revenue Funds’ revenue and appropriations as reflected in the follow ing table; General Fund Expenditures Elections Legal Fire Protection Emergency Preparedness Parks and Recreation Recycling Engineering Special Services - Consulting/Police Contingency Operating Transfer Out $ Adopted Budget Net Budget Amendment Amended Budget 8.390 $1.470 $9.860 88.500 10.280 98.780 199.473 (16.685)182.788 2.550 975 3.525 53.6%2.044 55.740 91.327 (4.844)86.483 13.100 7.735 20.835 25.700 27.685 53.385 65.595 (48.660)16.935 64.900 20.000 84.900 Net amendmeni - -35- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE I - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Tl» expenditure budget amendments in the General Fund were for the following purposes: Elections > The budget was increased to reflect higher than anticipated personal service costs Legal - The budget was increased to reflect higher than anticipated consulting serv ices. Fire Protection - The budget was decreased $20,000 to reflect a realk)cation from expenditures to an operating transfer out to the Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund for fire capital outlay, and the budget was increased $3,315 to reflect higher than anticipated service costs from certain provider cities, resulting in a net budget decrease of $16,685. •Parks and Recreation - The budget was increased for the purchase of additional maintenance supplies and maintenance of buildings and grounds. Recycling - The budget was decreased to reflect a realliKation of appropriations ti> other departments. Engineering - The budget increa.se was due to increa.sed use of the Engineer for projects. Special Services - Consulting/Police - The budget was increased for higher than anticipated legal and engineering services related to land use applications and for higher than anticipated use of police personnel for .special events at local businesses. Contingency - The budget was decreased to reflect i realisation of appropriations to other departments. Operating Transfer Out - The budget was increa.sed to provide additional funds needed in the Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund to cover tire capital outlay. -36- _____ CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE I - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINTJED) Special Revenue Funds Adopted Budget Net Budget Amendment Revenue Park Fund Interest earned on investments Park dedication fees Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Interest earned on investments User fees Operating transfers in Building Capital Outlay Fund Interest earned on investments Operating traasfers in $ 11,250 10,000 10,000 3,650 84,900 80,300 90,000 Expenditures Park Fund Miscellaneous Capital outlay Operating transfers out Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Capital outlay Building Capital (Dutlay Fund Capital outlay 8,450 20,475 90,000 135,050 2,059 31,600 Amended Budget 11,250 10,000 10,000 3.650 84,900 80,300 90.000 8,450 20.475 90.000 137,109 31,600 The revenue budget amendments in the Special Revenue Funds were for the following purposes: Park Fund - The revenue budget was established to reflect investment earnings and park dedication fees from developers. Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund - The revenue budget was established to reflect equipment use charges, investment earnings, and operating transfers in. Building Capital Outlay Fund - The revenue budget was established to reflect investment earnings and operating transfers in. n r ^ I -37- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MTNNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE I - SIGNinCANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) The expenditure budget amendments in the Special Revenue Funds were tor the following purposes: " Park Fund - The budget was increased to provide for a suA'ey and abstract, baseball improvements at Bederwood Park, wild life blinds and picnic table at the French Creek Preserve, and to provide for a transfer to purchase land at the French Creek Preserve. ° Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund - The budget was increased to provide for two personal computers for the finance department. ® Building Capital Outlay Fund - The budget was increased to provide for the demolition of the old Council chambers, clean-up of contaminated soils at the old public works site, and for miscellaneous equipment and construction costs related to the 1991 public facilities capital project. M.Memorandum Only Columns Becau.se the accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis, the columns on the combined financial statements captioned, "Totals (.Memorandum Only)," are presented for informational purposes only and arc not intended to represent consolidated information Data in these columns does not present financial position, results of operations, or cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. N.Comparative Data Comparative total data for the prior year has been presented in the acciimpanying financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the City's financial position and operations. However, comparative data has not been presented in all statements because its inclusion would make certain statements unduly complex and difficult to understand. O.Statement of Cash Flows For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time t)f purcha.se by the City of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Proprietary Funds' portion in the Citywide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent. -38- CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 2 - DEPOSITS AND iNVESTNffiNTS A.Deposits In accordance with ^plicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by insurance, surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits covered by insurance or bonds (140% in the case of mortgage-backed collateral). Authorized collateral includes the legal investments described below, as well as certain first mortgage notes and certain other state or local government obligations. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping by the City or in a financial institution other than that furni.shing the collateral. Deposits consist of checking accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit held in a bank or savings institution. At year-end. the carrying amount of the City’s depi^sits was $707,782. while the balance on the bank records was $804,066. At December 31, W4, all deposits for the City were insured i>r collateralized by securities held by the City’s agent in the City’s name. B.Cash on Hand Cash in the possession of the City, consisting of petty cash and change funds, at year-end totaled $360, C.Investments The City may also invest idle funds as authorized by Minne.stita Statutes, as follows: direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and whose only investments are in securities de.scribed above; general obligations of the State of .Minnesota or any of its municipalities; bankers’ acceptances of United States’ banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States’ corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, of the highest quality, and maturing in 270 days or less; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve Sy.stem with capitalizatiim exceeding S 10.000.0(K). a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers; and futures contracts sold under authority of Minnesota Statutes § 471.56. Subd. 5. -39- ...... I I I cmr OF ORONO, Minnesota Notes to Financial Statements (continued) Dc:emher 31, 1994 NOTE 2 - DEPOSITS AND imTISTMENl S (CONTINUED) The City’s investments are categorized below to give an indication of the level of custcxlial credit risk assumed at year-end. Category 1 includes investments that are insured or registered or for which the securities are held by the City or its agent in the City's name. Categor> 2 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the City’s name. Category 3 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty or by its trust department or agent but not in the City’s name. [>eposits and investment balances at December 31, 1994 are as follows: Custodial Credit Risk Category 1 Carrying Value U.S. government securities S State and Ux:al govemmeni securities Certificates of deposit 4.47K.5S4 SOO.tKK) -S 2.550.897 190.000 S 4.978.584 S -S 2,740.897 7.719.481 Ins’estment pools - unclassified Money market funds Held by deferred compensation trustees 59.927 616.f.lK) Total investments Deposits Cash on hand 707.782 360 Total deposits, invest ments. and cash on hand S 9.104.150 Deposits, investments, and cash on hand arc reported on the City’s combined balance sheet as follows: Cash and temporary investments Cash and investments held by trustee Restricted assets - cash and temporary investments S 7.080.816 616.6(H) 806,734 Total cash and investments $ 9.104.1.50 Market Value 7.029.481 S 6.996.590 500.000 503.020 190.000 190.000 7.689.610 59.927 616.600 8,.396,008 S 8.366,137 iTMWV-T rj.'T' CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 3 - PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT A.Changes in General Fixed Assets Balance Beginning of Year Additions Deletions Balance End of Year Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Equipment $1,129,7%$110,000 $ .$1.239.796 3.210,130 -5,000 3,205,130 1,192,284 166,438 55,593 1,303.129 $5,532,210 $276,438 $60,593 $5,748.055 B.Proprietary Fund Type Property, Plant, and Equipment Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total Work In progress $$26.558 $-$26.558 Land and improvements 57,132 16.210 127.977 201,319 Buildings and improvements 786,594 31.014 48.722 866.330 Equipment 53.828 85.687 97,284 236.799 Distribution/collection system 2.083.577 6.685.138 -8.768.715 2.981,131 6,844.607 273.983 10.099.721 Less accumulated depreciation 839,624 2.484,513 53..553 3,377.690 $ 2,141.507 $4.360.094 $220.430 $6.722.031 -41- Ic L t I ' = f I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Sutements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE A -DEFERRED CREDITS AND REVENUE A.Contract for Deed The City sold a section of land to a homeowners ’ association on a contract for deed in February 1984. The sales price of $100,0(X) will be received in equal quarterly payments over a 15-year period, without interest. At December 31. 1994, the remaining balance of $13,358 on the contract tt<r deed is recorded as deferred revenue in the General Fund until collected and available to finance current operations. B.1985 Special Assessments The City adopted a special assessment roll in 1985 which included $46,175 relating to improvements im City-owned property. The General Fund will pay the.se assessments over 15 years in annual installments with 9.2% interest. The remaining assessment principal balance of $18,455 at December 31. 1994 has been recorded as due to/from other funds. The related revenue and charges have been deferred in the 1985 Improvement Debt Service and General Funds, respectively. C.1989 Special Assessments The City adopted special assessment rolls in 1989 which included $8,135 relating to improvements on City-owned property. The General Fund will pay these assessments over five years in annual installments with 8% interest. The final installment was paid in 1994. D.Developer Advances In 1989. the City began construction of sewer ai.d water improvements almig State Highway 12 but has not finalized the amounts to be specially asses.sed again.st benefited fn'perties. The developers within the project area were charged a preliminary amount for the improvements. This amount has beti. deferred in the Water and Sewer Operating Funds. E.Sewer Operating Enterprise Fund - Due From Other Goveniinental Unils.'Deferred Credits This amount represents the credits resulting from the transfer of the City ’s sewer treatment facilities to the Metropolitan Wa.Me Control Commission (MWCC). The remaining balances due from MWCC total $299,948 for the facilities and $503 for resers’e capacity charges and a*'e included in due from other governmental units as of December 31, 1994 The iotal price tor each portion of the facilities will be received over 30 years with intere.st at 49c per annum by credits against the annual sewage handling charges .if MWCC MWCC has included the co.st of these facilities in its ba.se rate, thus "payment' of credits is dependent upon MWCCs .setting future user fees at a level sufficient to cover all such credits from participating municipaliiies. Therefore, the revenue has been deterred until such user fees are paid or accrued. -42- ♦■V' CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Nc^es to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 4 - DEFERRED CREDITS AND REVENUE (CONTINUED) Composition of the deferred balance is as follcm*s: Facility Treatment Works 1963 Interceptor 1965 Interceptor MWCC Acquisition Year 1971 1977 1977 Remaining Deferred Credits $2.355 102.782 6.872 $112.009 I I 1 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT A.Components of Long-Term Debt Origiiul Issue Interest Rate Issue Date Final Maturity Date Balance End of Year General long-term debt General Obligaiic'ii Bond.s Improvement Bond.v of 1982 $475.000 6.50-10.00 12-1-1982 3-1-1999 $75.000 Improvement Boml.s of 1985 $900.000 5.50-8.25^;7-1-1985 1-1-2001 420,000 ImproN emem Bonds of 1992 $2.000.000 3.30-5.505?8-1-1992 2-1-2008 1.915.000 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds of 1991 $4,000.000 4.50-6.SO'?12-1-1991 2-1-2008 3.835.000 Vacalior. and severance Ktiefiis payable N/A N/A N/A N/A 137.421 Total general long-tenn debt Proprietary Fund debt Revenue Bottds G 0. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989 $2.300.000 6.10-6.605?9-16-1989 2-1-2002 6.382.421 1.950.000 Total all long-temt debt $ 8.332.421 -43- I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA N mcs to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) B.SUitfinent of Changes In Long-Term Debt General Long-Term Debt $ 6,924.946 (550.000) 7,475 Enterprise Fund Debt $ 2,125.000 (175.000) Total $ 9.049.946 (725,000) 7.475 Balance - beginning of year Debt retired Net change in vacation and severance benefits payable Balance - end of year ___________ ____________ ____________ C.Minimum Debt Payments Minimum annual principal and interest payments required to retire long-term debt, excluding vacation and severance benefits payable: $ 6,382.421 $ 1.950.000 $ 8.332.421 Year Ending December 31 General L('ng-Term Debt Enterprise Funds Total 1995 S 693.121 S 318.775 S 1,011.896 19%694.714 306.275 1.0^K).989 1997 709.725 317.994 1.027.719 1998 706.943 303.819 1.010.762 1999 697.567 313.612 1.011.179 2000-2008 5.543.220 935.250 6.478.470 S 9.045.290 $2.495.725 s 11.541.015 D.Descriptions and Restrictions of Long-Term Debt 1.General Long-Term Debt ® General Obligation Bonds - Thc'C bond.s vscrc i>sueJ to finance various improcements and will be repaid from taxes and special a.s>essmenLs .All are backed by the full faith and credit of the Cii> The G O Improvement Bi>nds of 1980 were called and all outstanding himds were redeemed and paid on .March 1. 1994 at 101*^ nt pir. plus accrued interest « • CITY CF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 1 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) *Public Facilities Bonds of 1991 > These bonds were issued by the Housing and Redev’elopment Authority of Orono for the purpose of financing tne construction of facilities for a City meeting haP, City offices, police offices, detention and priKessing. public works office space, stora|,« maintenance, and repair of machinery and equipment, and a cold storage buildinj “uant to Minnesota Statutes § 469.103a, lease-purchase contracts between the Authu.,.^ and the City and a Tru.st l.ndtrture between the Authority and American National Baik and Trust Company have been cuablished. The bonds are special obligations of the City as issuer and owner of the land and buildings. The City has pledged rental payments in amounts equal to the debt service requirements and plans to annually appropriate '^ity funds available for this purpose. In addition. Minnesota Statutes ^ 475.50. Subd. 5(e) allows cities to make a special levy (outside ot levy limits) to pay principal and interest on bonds of another political subdivision. The Minnesota Department of Revenue has determined that because a Housing and Redevelopment Authtirity is a political subdivision of the state, a levy to pay principal and interest on the bonds would be outside the City's levy limits. “ Vacation and Severance Benefits Payable - This liability represents vested benefits earned by employ ees other than Proprietary Fund employ ees through the end of the year (other than the current portion paid w'ithin 60 days), which w ill be paid or used in future periinls. The liability for Proprietary Fund employ ees is included In the accrued liabilities of those funds. 2.Proprietary Fund Debt ® G.O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989 - These bimds were issued to finance improvements to the water and .sewer sy.stems and will be repaid from net revenues id the water and sewer systems, connection charges, and special assessments levied against benefitted properties Under the resolution authorizing the sale of the bonds, the City is required to have in a water and sewer bond restricted cash account an amount not less than the total amount of the principal and interest on the bonds due and payable the following year. Amounts credited to the water and sewer account are to be used only for payment of principal and interest on the bonds. Net revenues of the water and sewer sy.stems after pay ment of operation and maintenance expenses are available to be credited to the water and sewer bond account as required. Unspent bond proceeds received are restricted for debt service or con.struction in t* " Water and Sewer Operating Enterpri.se Funds. E.Ultimate Responsibility for Debt Long-term debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the City, except the Public Facilities Revenue Bonds of 1991. -45- I J I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Sutements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) F.Resources to Meet Future Debt Requirements •Amounts Available for Long-Term Debt - Available fund balance designated or reser\eJ for repayment of long-term debt includes: General Fund $ 137.421 Debt Service Funds 1,354,259 $ 1,491,680 *Amount to be Provided in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group - This amount represents future revenue to be generated for debt payments, generally including deferred tax levies, special assessment fund transfers, and interest earnings. Deferred tax levies scheduled to be placed on the tax rolls, as needed, total $655,300 at December 31. 1994. NOTE 6 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS The City otters its employees deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Intel nal Revenue Code § 457. The plans, available to all employees, permit them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to t'nplo>vw:> until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseen er ergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts are solely the property and r'ghts of the City, subject to the claims of the City's general creditors. Participants’ rights under the plans are equal to those of general crediu'rs of the City in an ami^unt equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. The City has no liability for losses under the plans but does have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent invest»)r. The City believc.> that it is unlikely that it will use the as.sets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. -46- cm’ OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 7 - FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN *11)6 City offers a flexible benefit plan. The plan is a "cafeteria plan" under § 125 of the Internal Revenue Code. All employees who meet the eligibility requirements may participate in the plan. To be eligible an employee must be at lea.st 20 years of age and be an employee who is regularly scheduled to work more than 20 houra per week. Eligible employees can elect to participate by contributing pre-tax dollars withheld from payroll checks to the plan for health care and dependent care benefits. Payments are made from the plan to participating employees upon submitting a request for reimbursement of eligible expen.ses actually incurred by the participant. All a.ssets of the plan are held by the City. The plan is admini.stered by an independent contract adm inistrator for child care and medical expense reimbursements, and by the City for health insurance premiums. The plan is included in the financial statements as an Expendable Trust Fund. All plan property and income attributable to that property is solely the property of the City, subject to the claims of the City ’s general creditors. Participants’ rights under the plan are equal to tho.se of general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the eligible health care and dependent care expenses incurred by the participants. The City believes that it is unlikely that it w ill use the a.s.sets to satisfv the claims of general creditors in the future. NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A.Plan Description All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City of Ortmo are covered by defined benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employees ’ Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees ’ Retirement Fund (PERF) and the Public Employees ’ Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost-sharing, multiple-employer retirement plans. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated members are covered by Social Security and Basic members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, fire fighters, and peace officers who qualifx for membership by .statute are covered by the PEPFF. The payroll for employees covered by PERF and PEPFF for the /ear ended December 31. 1994 was approximately $933,532 and $717,055. respectively; the City s total payroll was $1,687,199. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon the death of eligible members. Benefits are established by state statute, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member’s average salary for any five successive year- f allowable service, age. and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for Coordinated and Basic members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (.Method I) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1. the annuity accrual rate tor a Basic member is 2.0% of the average salary for each of the first ten years of .service and 2.5% for each remaining year. For a Coordinated member, the annuit,, accrual rate is 1.0% of the average salary for each of the first ten years and 1.5% for each remaining year. -47- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9 I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEHT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINTED) Using Method 2. the annuity accrual rate is 2.5% of the average salary for Basic members and 1.5% for Ciwrdinated members. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 2.5% for each year of service through June 30, 1993. Effective July 1, 1993, the annual accrual rate for PtPFF is 2.65%. For PERF members whose annuity is calculated usinp Method 1, and for all PEPFF members, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A normal annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree. No surv ivor annuity is payable. There are also variiHJs types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will reduce the monthly normal annuity amount, because the annuity is payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service, in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. B.Contributions Required and Contributions Made Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. The City makes annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. According to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 356.215, Subd 4(g), the date of lull funding required lor the PERF and the PEPFF is the year 2020. As part of the annual actuarial valuation, PERA's actuary determines the sufficiency of the statutory contributiim rates towards meeting the required full funding deadline. The actuary compares the actual contribution rate to a "required" contribution rate. Current combined statutiiry contribution rates and actuarially required contribution rates for the plans are as 1\»llows: Statutorv Rates Employees Employer Required Rates * PERF (Basic and Coordinated Plans) PEPFF 4.30% 7.90% 4.60% 11.70% 9.58% 17.45% *The recommended rates scheduled above represent the required rates for fiscal year 1994 contributions as reported in the July 1, 1993 actuarial valuation reports. Total contributions made by the City during fiscal year 1994 were: Amounts Percentage of Covered Payroll Employees Employer Employees Employer PERF PEPFF S .39.522 $ 41.858 .54..321 81.481 4.23 % 7.58% 4.48% 11.36% S 93.843 $ 123.3.39 -48- ■ cnr OF ORONO, ntinnesota Notes to Financial Statements (continued) Detemher 31. 1994 NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTIM ED) Tlie City ’s contribution for the year ended December 31, 1994 to the °ERF represented 0.02'r of total employer contributions required of all participating entities. For the PEPFF, contributions b)r the year ended December 31 . 1994 represented 0.15 % of total employer contributions required of all participating entities. C.Funding Status and Progress 1.Pewion Benefit Obligation The "pension benefit obligation" is a standardized disclosure measure of the present value of pension benefus. adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step-rate benefits, estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee ser\ ice to date. The measure, which is the actuarial present value of credited projected benefits, is intended to help users assess PERA’s funding status on a going-concern basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due. and make comparisons among Public Employees’ Retirement Systems and among employers. PERA does not make separate measurements of assets and pension benefit obligation for individual employers. The pension benefit obligations as of June 30. 1994 are shown below: PERF PEPFF Total pension benefit obligation Net assets available for benefits, at cost (market values for PERF = $4,762,519,000. PEPFF = SI.237.484.000) Unfunded (assets in excess of) pensic.n benefit obligation $ 5.625.598.000 $ 1.020.9.50.000 4.733.845.000 1.229.769.000 891.753.000 $ (208.819.000) The measurement of the pension benefit obligation is based on an actuar. d valuation as of June 30. 1994. Net assets available to pay pension benefits were valued as of June 30. 1994. For the PERF. significant actuarial a.ssumptions used in the calculation of the pension benefit obligation include: (a) a rate of return on the inve.stment of present and future as.sets of 8.5% per year, compounded annually, prior to retirement, and 5.0% per year, compounded annually, following retirement; (b) projected salary increases taken from a select and ultimate table; (c)payroll growth at 6.0% per year, consisting of 5.0% for inflation and 1.0% due to growth in group size; (d) post-retirement benefit increases that are accounted for by the 5.0% rate of return assumption follow ing retirement; and (e) mortality rates based on the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table set forward one year for retired members and set back five years for each active member. -49- 9 I I I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) Actuarial assumptions used in the calculation of the PEPFF include; (a) a rate of return on the investment of present and future assets of 8.5% per year, compounded annually, prior to retirement, and 5.0% per year, compounded annually, following retirement; (b) projected salary increases of 6.5% per year, compounded annually, attributable to the effects of inflation; (c) post retirement increa.ses that are accounted for by the 5.0% rate of return assumption following retirement; and (d) mortality rates based on the 1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table projected to 1984 for males and females. 2.Changes In Plan Provisions The 1994 legislative session did not include any benefit improvements which would impact funding costs for the PERF and the PEPFF. 3.Changes in Actuarial Assumptions Prior to fiscal year 1994. the salary increase assumption and the mortality tables used in the calculation of the pension benefit obligation for the PERF were the same as tho.se specified for the PEPFF. For the July 1. 1994 actuarial valuation. PERA's Board of Trustees approved new mortality rates updated to the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, salary increases which were changed to a select and ultimate table, and a new payrvdl growth assumption which was changed from 6.5% to 6.0%. These changes were made ti> reflect actual experience of the plan. With the adoption of the actuarial assumption changes and the new mortality tables for the PERF, the pension benefit obligation increased by S56.596.000. The actuarial a.ssurnption changes also necessitated an $81 .201 .000 transfer from the PERF Benefit Reserve to the PERF Minnesena Post Retirement Investment Fund (MPRIF) Reserve to finance the increased obligation for future retirement benefits. The change m the mortality rate assumption increased the PERF’s co.sts because pensioners are living longer than assumed previously. The change in the salary increase assumption, however, off set .some of the additional costs becau.se lower salary increases generally translate into lower benefit liabilities in the future. Potential changes in the assumptions used for the PEPFF may be made in the future after completion of a special experience study for that fund. Completion of the PEPFF experience study is expected by February I. 1995. I -50- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) D.Ten-Year Historical Trend Information Ten-year historical trend information is presented in PERA’s Component Unit Financial Repon for the year ended June 30, 1994. This information is useful in a.s.sessing the pension plan’s accumulation of sufficient assets to pay pension benefits as they become due. E.Related Party Investments As of June 30, 1994, and for the fiscal year then ended, PERA held no securities is.sued by the City or other related parties. NOTE 9 - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES A.Interfund Receivables and Payables at Year-End Inter fund Receivables Interfund Pavables General Fund Debt Service Fund.> 1985 Improvement $$ 18.455 18.455 $ 18,455 $ 18.455 B.Interfund Advances Advances To Advances From Other Funds Other Funds General Fund Capital Project Funds Permanent Improvement Revolving $ 10,041 10,043 $ 10.043 $ 10.0^', In 1988. the General Fund advanced $113,541 to the Permanent Imprinement Revolving Fund to nay for the construction costs of the County Ri*ad 15 street light project. The advance is considered a h.vn and is subject to repayment from the Permanen* Improvement Revolving Fund to the General Fund from special assessments levied against properties determined to benefit from the project. Because of the long term nature of the advance, the fund balance has been re.served in the General Fund for a corresponding amiiunt In 1994. $12,938 was collected and applied to the advance leaving a bahmee of $10,043 at December 31. 1994. -51- .J I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31. 1994 NOTE 9 - INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED) C.Reservations and Designations of Fund Balances and Retained Earnings For various reasons, certain funds have a portion of their fund equity resersed vU designated tV'f specific purposes. A discussion of each such item as it appears on the Combined balance Sheet follows: Reservation of Retained Earnings " Reserve for Revenue Bond Debt Service - This reserve in the Water and Sewer Operating Funds represents fund balances which are presently committed to provide financial resources to pay principal and interest on the City ’s general obligation water and sewer revenue bonds, as stipulated by bond covenant. Reservation of Fund Balances “ Reserves for Prepaid Items and Advances to Other Funds - These reserves in the General Fund repre.sent the amount of fund balance which does not represent spendable resources i»f the General Fund. Designated for Unreserved Fund Balances ®Designated for Road/Bridge Projects - The amounts in the Capital Pnyect Funds represent fund balances that have been designated for specific road and bridge improvement projects. ®Designated for Emergency Contingencies - This amount in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Capital Project Fund represents fund balances which have been designated by the City Council to be segregated as an emergency source of funds. ®Designated for Construction - This amount represents fund balances which are committed to pay for construction of the sanitary sewer project costs on the 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Capital Project Fund. ®Designated for Capital Outlay - These amounts represent fund balances which are committed to pay for capital outlay in the Special Revenue Funds. ®Designated for Debt Service - These amounts represent fund balances which are presently committed to provide financial resources to pa\ principal and intere.st on the City ’s general obligation bonds. ®Designated for Vacation/Severance Benefits - This amount in the General Fund represents fund balance which has been designated for pavment of the estimated long-term liability for vacation and severance benefits. I -52- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Nates to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 10 - FUND TRANSFERS The following transfers were made during the year ended December 31, 1994: A.Operating Transfers Funds Transferred From Transferred To General Fund Specia' Revenue Fund - Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Special Revenue Fund Park Special Revitnue Fund - Building Capital Outlay Coital Project Fund - IWl Public Facilities Construction Debt Service fund - 1991 Public Facii’ties Revenue Bonds Special Revenue Fund -Debt Service Fund - Building Capital Outlay 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds B.Residua) Equity Transfers Funds Transferred From Transferred Tt> Debt Service Fund -Enterprise Fund - 1980 Improvement Bonds Water Operating -53- Amount Deset iption $ 84.900 Capital (Outlay expenditures 90,000 To transfer the estimated value of parkland. 343 To assist in funding revenue blind debt. 95,170 To finance current operating expenditures. Amount Description $ 71.483 To close 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Serx ’ice Fund. * u L j I !» I I CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 11 - SEGMENT INFORMATION FOR ENTERPRISE FLINDS The City provides services which are accounted for in the Enterprise Funds. The segment information for these Enterprise Funds for the year ended December 31, 1994 i.s as follows: Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total Gross profit and operating revenue Depreciation expense Operating income (loss) Net income (loss) Property, plant, and equipment - additions Net working capital Bonds payable Total assets Total equity $202,446 $556,360 $178,283 $937,089 $62,495 $145.567 $9,258 $217,320 $(29,072)$(91,250)$47,822 $(72,500) $(52.787)$(2.740)$44,630 $(10,897) $13.712 $60.470 $29,258 $103,440 $85,201 $1,248,1 is $146,160 $1.479.480 $986,507 $963,493 $$1.950.000 $2,333,715 $6,647,355 $368,949 $9,350,019 $1,234.644 $5.505.971 $359,784 $7,100,399 NOTE 12 - PROPRIETARY FUNDS’ CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL This balance represents the cost of property contributed to the Enterprise Funds by the City, less depreciation thereon charged to operations. Changes occurring in this account during the year were as follows: Water Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Total Balance - beginning of year AuJ residual equity transfer from 1980 Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund Less depreciation on contribuUu assets Bal.ince - end of year $ 1,039.438 $ 3,943.648 $ 144.781 $ 5.127,867 71,483 (34.873)(121.755)(254) 71,483 (156,882) $ 1.076,048 $ 3.821.893 $ 144.527 $ 5.042.468 During 1994. the outstanding bonds of the 1980 Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund were called. The residual equity of the fund was transferred to the Water Operating Fund for the purpo.se of a.ssisting in the debt .service requirements of the G.O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989. -54- —.'r -T' CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Notes to Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 1994 NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES t A.General Amounts recorded or receivable from state agencies are subject to agency audit and adjustment. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable hinds. The amount, if any, of claims which may be disallowed by the grantor agencies cannot be determined at this time although the City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. B.Construction During the year ended December 31, 1994, the City awarded certain contracts for various construction projects. The City ’s commitment for uncompleted work on these contracts at December 31, 1994 was approximately $463,000. C.Facility Lease During the year ended December 31, 1991, the City entered into an unconditional lease with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Orono for the City Hall and the police and public works facilities. The lease with an option to purchase continues until February 1.2008 or until terminated through cancellation by not appropriating sufficient funds for payment, defeasance, default, or purcha.se of the project by the City. The City is responsible for the real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, and maintenance of the property. The rent expen.se in 1994 was approximately $394,135. Future minimum rental commitments under the lease are as follows: V ! Year Amount 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Thereafter $ 396.266 402.455 402,700 406,903 405,017 3,704.484 $ 5,717.825 The lease purchase payments will equal the principal and interest due on the 1991 - HRA Public Facilities Bonds issued to construct the facilities. -55- ! 1 I I i il I 1 •FbiMKial S«cti(M • ConMning aiMl liMiNMualFufid and Account Group Statements :•’,■ I L-C-.^___L...C___L I I I I I I I I I I I I I :4 GENERAL FUND The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to he accounted for in another fund. I I I I I -56- OTY OF CaiONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of December 31,1994 and 1993 Assets Cash and temporary investments Receivables Accounts Accrued interest Delinquent taxes Delinquent special assessments Qmtract for deed Adv-ances to other funds Due from other gov^rnmcnuil units Prepaid items Deferred charge — assessments on property owned by City Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Fund Equity Liabilities Aca)unts payable Accrued salaries pyable Due to other funds EXie to other governmental units Deferred revenue Qmtract for deed IX'Iinquent taxes Special assessments Total liabilities Fund equity Fund balance Resers’cd for prepaid items Reserved for advances to other ftmds Unreserved Dt'signated for vested vacation and severance benefits Undesignated Total tund equity Total liabilities and frmd equity -57- 1994 Exhibit B-1 1993 $ L344.2S3 $ 1,282,624 f i 14,721 9,791 f 1 84,638 69,879 i 70,464 109,031 5,195 5.195 : 13,358 19.072 % 10,043 22.981 100.829 33.228 • 1 34.502 — 1 18,455 23.031 2.040 3,648 1 j i $ 1,698,528 % 1 i V $ 75.535 $ 89.453 : 62.902 78.754 18.455 23.0.M 46.055 44.043 13,358 19.072 46,470 69.373 5,195 5,195 267,970 328,'922 1 1 i 34,502 ■ 10,043 22,981 V.- 137,421 129,946 1 1,248.592 1.096,631 v_ 1,430.558 i.249.558 $ 1,698.528 $ 1.578,480 L Exhibit B-2 CITY OF OKONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statemoit of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31,1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1993) I I 1994 1993 0\’er (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual Revenue Taxes Property $ 1,633,165 $ 1,644.974 $11,809 $ 1.546.814 Penalties and interest -159 159 — Total taxes 1,633,165 1,645.133 11,968 1,546,814 Special assessments —624 624 — Licenses and permits Licenses 10.725 15,844 5,119 15.073 Permits 111,275 132,044 20.769 150,824 Total licenses and permits 122,000 147,888'25,888 165,897 IntergovemmenUtl Federal emergency preparedness 4.000 4,500 500 4,788 State grants Homestead and agricultural credit aid 258.203 260,327 2,124 247.317 Police town aid 70,000 81.791 11.791 77,879 Police training reimbursement 5.000 5,911 911 6,043 Municipal state-aid streets 75.000 94,483 19,483 67,664 County grant - recycling 45,360 47.145 1.785 48,359 Other —462 462 1.070 Total intergovernmental 457,563 494,619 37,056 453,120 Charges lor services General government 205.960 238,362 32.402 246.651 Public safety 603,493 612.803 9,310 619,383 Total charges for services 809.453 851.165 41,712 866,034 Fines and forfeits 66.000 58,158 (7,842)61.491 Other Interest earned on investments 30.000 49,065 19,065 36.378 Rents 5,100 5,400 —5,400 Refunds and reimbursc-menls 8.000 21,566 13.566 10,631 Contract for deed - land 3.8(»0 5.714 1.914 6,814 Miscellaneous 4,200 4,263 63 20.930 T otal other 51.400 ____86.(108 34.608 80,153 ToUil revenue 3,139,581 3,283,595 144,014 3,173.509 (continued) -58- Exhibit B-: cnr OF ORONO, Minnesota General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December ? 1 , 1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December .^1,1 99.t) 1994 1993 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual Expenditures General government Mavor and council Personal services 16,440 16,349 (91)16,404 Supplies 160 22 (138)345 Olher services and charges 47,316 32,925 (14.391)39.694 Total ma>or and council 63,916 49,296 (14,620)56.443' Administration Persona! services 163,247 166,067 2,820 158,444 Supplies 3,400 3,889 489 3.996 Other services and charges 27,549 24.172 (3.377)20.869 ToUd administration 194,196 194,128 (68)1 83.309 Elections Personal services 6,830 7,304 474 497 Supplies 350 161 (189)— Other services and charges 2,680 2.395 (285)I,l«2 lotal elections 9,860 9,‘860 —1.689 Assessing Personal services ———1,138 Supplies 1,300 483 (817)1,737 Olher services and charges 74.506 75,134 628 73.342 1 olal assessing 75,806 75.6r7 (189)76,217 Finance Personal services 126.730 122,500 (4.230)121,207 Supplies 850 826 (24)1,842 Other services and charges 37.510 39,369 1,859 37,550 Total finance 165.090 162,695 (2.395)160.599 Legal Olher services and charges 98,780 98,777 (3)76,397 I luman sc-rvices Other services and charges 14.940 13,940 (1,000)14,166 (continued) -59 L. L. '4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fxhihit B-2 aiY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in I'und Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 31,1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1993) Expenditures (continued) General government (continued) General government buildings Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Total general government buildings Total general government Public safety Police protection Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Total police protection Fire protection Contracted fire protection Protective inspection and zoning Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Total protective inspection and zoning Emergency prcpar<'dness Supplies Other services and charges 1 otal emergency preparedness -60- 1994 199.3 Budget Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual 2,045 65,530 67,575 2,249 60,456 62,705 204 (5.074) (4,870) 12.012 3.842 72,171 88.02.S 690,163 667.018 (23.145)656.845 923,57. 48,500 140,386 34.000 1,146.458 923,196 42.466 140,164 30.081 1.135,907 (376) (6,034) (222) (3.919} (10.5.M) 906,354 37,209 142,726 34.803 1,121.092 182,788 182,783 (5)178,298 269.862 4.720 35.872 271.001 4,424 34,822 1,139 (296) (1.050) 261,960 5,350 34.363 310,454 310,247 (207).301.673 100 3,425 233 3,288 1.33 (1.37)3.458 3,525 .3.521 (4)3.458 (continued) ——PU.'.—--■■LJ.— -- Exhibit B-2 i OTi' OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue. Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) (continued) Year Ended December 31,1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1993) 1994 1993 Budget Actual O’er (Under) Budget Actual Expenditures (continued) Public safety (continued) Animal control Personal services 11,062 10,515 (M7)8.295 Supplies 300 369 69 167 Other services and charges 3,593 2,826 (767)1.683 Total animal control 14,955 13.710 (1.245)10,145 Total public safety 1,658,180 1,646,168 (12.012)1,614,666 Streets Personal services 226.765 223,414 (3,351)214,9.38 Supplies 90,500 81.381 (9.119)189.992 Other scrV'ices and charges 168,780 180.696 11.916 91,053 Total streets 486,045 485,491 (554)495,98.3 Parks and recreation Personal services 25,554 25,202 (352) 34,965 Supplies 3,500 3.151 (349)4.937 eXher services and charges 26.686 27,386 700 18.178 Total parks and recreation 55,740 55,739 0).s‘8.080 Recycling Personal services 2,123 2.068 (55)6,517 Supplies 550 1,487 937 620 Other services and charges 83,810 68,582 (15.228) 78.256 Total recycling 86,483 72,137 (14,346)85,393 Miscellaneous Engineering 20,835 20,831 (4)10,808 Special services - consulting police 53,385 53,380 (5)33.784 Contingency 16.935 16,931 (4)22,562 Toliil miscellaneous 91,155 91,142 (13)67,154 Total expenditures 3,067,766 3.017.695 (50.071)2,978,121 Excess of revenue over expenditures 71.815 265,900 194.085 195.388 (continued) -61- J I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I cmr OF ORONO, Minnesota General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basts) (continued) Year Ended December 31,1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1993) 1994 Budget Actual Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in C^>erating transfers (out) Total other financing sources (uses) Excess of revenue and other financing sources over expen ditures and other financing uses Fund balance Beginning of year End of vear 13,085 (84,900)(84.900) (71,815) S 1.249.558 -62- 0\-er (Under) Budget _ (13,085) (84,900)(13,085) 181,000 $ 181,(too Exhibit B-2 1993 Actual 84.695 (94.900) M 0,205) 185,183 1.064.375 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for revenue derived from specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. Park Fund - used to account for park dedication fees received to be used for land acquisition and park development. Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund - used to replace non-enterprise, non-police City equipment. Building Capital Outlay Fund - used to partially finance building facilities con.struction and additions through transfers from the General Fund -63- Exhibit C-1 crry of orono. Minnesota Special Revenue Funds Q'lmbining Balance Sheet As of December 31.1994 (wiiti Comparative Totals as of December 31. 1993) Park Assets Cash and temporary investments $ 294,329 Receivables Accrued interest 10.369 Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities Accounts payable Fund balance Unreserved Designated for capital outlay Total liabilities and tund balance 304.698 Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Building Capital Outlay Totals 1994 $ 336,989 11.840 99,320 121.529 $ 4.217 344.612 2,476.441 3.125.751 $ 304,698 $ 348,829 -64- 1993 $ 2,381,471 $ 3,012.789 $ 2.970.839 50.587 $ 304,698 $ 348.829 $ 2.480.791 $ 3.134.318 $ 3.021.426 $4.350 $8.567 $5.553 3.015.873 $ 2.480,791 $ 3.134.318 $ 3.021,426 » i V. 1 ! y Exhibit r-2 cnr OF ORONO, Minnesota Special Revenue Funds Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Year Ended December 31, 1994 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31,1993) Revenue Other Interest earned on investments User fees Park dedication fees Miscellaneous Total revenue Expenditures Current Miscellaneous Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) PriKeeds from sale of land and other Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance Beginning of year End of vear Park Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Building Capital Outlay Totals 1994 199.3 $ 16,130 $17,695 $ 134,511 S 168.336 $140.652 —2,745 -2.745 3,270 122.850 ——122.850 24,708 300 5.478 —5.778 - 139,280 25.918 1.34.511 299,709 168,630 8.450 8,450 . 20,475 119,037 31.599 171,111 13.680 28.925 119.037 31,599 179,.‘t61 13,680 110..355 (93.119)102.912 120,148 154.9.';0 290.179 —84,900 90,000 174,900 — (90,000)—(95.170)(185,170)— (90,000)84.900 (5.170)(10,270)290.179 20,355 (8.219)97.742 109,878 (178.7.S9) 284.343 352,831 2.378.699 .3.015.873 3,194,6.32 $ .304,698 S 344,612 $ 2^76,441 $ 3,125.751 $ 3.015.873 -65- Exhibit C-3 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Park Fund Statonent of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31.1994 (with COTiparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31,1993) Revenue Other Interest earned on investments Park dedication fees Miscellaneous Q'»ntributions Total revenue Expenditures C'urrent Miscellaneous Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing uses Operating transfer (out) Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance Beginning of year End of year 1994 1993 Budget Actaal Over (Under) Budget Actual $ 11,250 10.000 $ 16.130 122.850 $ 4.880 112.850 $ 13.905 24.708 —30C 300 — 21.250 139.280 118.030 38.613 8,450 20.475 8.450 20.475 — 12.970 28,925 28.925 —12.970 (7.675)110.355 118.030 25.643 (90.000)(90,000) $ C)7,675)20.355 S 118.030 25.643 284.343 258,700 $ 304.698 $ 284.343 I !1 I- f 1 i -66- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit C-4 CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Improvement and Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31.1994 (with Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended EXcember 31,1993) Revenue Other Interest earned on investments User fees Miscellanevus Total revenue Expenditures Capital outlay General government Administration Finance Public safety Building and zoning Pi>lice protection Streets Parks and recreation Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing sources Operating transfer m Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources over expenditures Fund balance Beginning of year End of year 1994 1993 Budget Aaual Oser (Under) Budget Actual $ 10.000 $ 17,695 $ 7.695 $ 12.464 3.650 2.745 (905)3,270 —5.478 5.478 — 13.650 25.918 12.268 15.734 265 265 710 2.059 2.799 740 — 8.800 10.516 1.716 — 4.217 4,217 — 125.000 98,145 (26.855)— 1.250 3,095 1.845 — 137.109 119.()37 (18.07^710 (123.459)(93.119)30,340 15,024 84.900 84,900 94,900 $ (38.559)(8,219)S 30.340 109,924 352.831 $ 344.612 242.907 $ 352.831 -67- Exhibit C-5 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Building Capital Outlay Fund Statemoit of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) Year Ended December 31,1994 (witii Q>mparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended Etecember 31,1993) 1994 1993 Budget Aaual Over (Under) Budget Actual Revenue Other Interest earned on investments $ 80,300 $134,511 $54,211 $114,283 Expenditures Capital outlay General government General government buildings 31.600 31.599 (1) Excess of revenue over expenditures 48.700 102.912 54,212 114.283 Other financing sources (uses) Sale of land 290.179 Operating transfers in 90.000 90.000 —— Ojx'rating transfers (out)(95.170)(95,170)—(718.788) Total other financing sources (uses)(5.170)(5.170)(428.609) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources o”er expenditures and other financing uses $ 43,530 97.742 $54,212 (314.326) Fund balance Beginning of year 2.378.699 2.693.025 End of year $ 2,476,44 1 $ 2,378,699 -68- V I I f \ L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Debt Service Funds arc used t(' account tor the accumulati(»n of resources used for the payment of principal, interest, and fiscal agent fees on general long-term debt.1 -69- OTYCFCmONO. MINNESOTA Debt Senice Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of December 31,1994 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31. 1993) 1 Assets Cash and temporary investments Receivables Accrued interest Delinquent taxes Delinquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Due from other funds Restricted assets Cash and temfx>rary investments Total assets Liabilities and Fund Rtlanee Liabilities Acaiunts payable Deferred revenue Delinquent taxes Special assessments Special assessments on City property Total liabilities Fund balance Unrcser\ ed Designated for debt service Total liabilities and fund balance 1980 Improve ment Bernds 531 33.799 $ 34.330 34,330 1982 Improve ment Bonds 10.208 134 1985 Improve ment Bonds -$ 69,278 $ 149.373 10.593 1.852 8.794 68.588 18,455 $ 34.330 $ 79.620 $ 257,655 $ 25 $ 62 1.2(K) —77.052 —18.455 87 96.707 79,533 160.948 I I I I I I I $ 34.330 $ 79,620 $ 257.655 -/- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1991 Exhibit D-1 Public 1992 Facilities Improve- Revenue ment Totals Bonds Bonds 1994 1993 $ 534,382 $ 563,707 $ 1,316,740 $ 1,163.068 13,508 34.309 37.846 7,937 358 10.281 14.105 —16,619 25.944 30.029 779,783 882,170 1.060.917 ——18.455 21.535 412,804 $ 542,319 $ 1,373.975 $ 2.287.JW_$ 2.740,304 $ 1.078 $S 1.103 $1,624 4,834 202 6.298 9.829 —796.402 907.784 1.088.114 ——18.455 21.535 5,912 796.604 933.640 1.121.102 536.407 577.371 1.354,159 1.619.202 $ 542.319 $ 1,373.975 $ 2.287,899 $ 2,740,304 -71- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Statement of Revenue, Expendinires, and Changes in Fund Balance Year Ended December 31,1994 (with Comparative Totals tor Year Ended December 31,1993) Revenue Taxes Property Penalties and interest Special assessments Intergovernmental Homestead and agricultural credit aid Other Interest earned on investments Miscellanwus Total revenue Expenditures Debt serv ice Principiil retirement Interest on bonds Fiscal agent fees Miscellaneous Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in ojx'rating transfers (out) Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing Fund balance Beginning of yciir Rfsiduitl equity transfer (out) End of year 1980 1982 1985 ImproveImfM'Ove-Improve ment ment ment Bonds Bonds Bonds $307 $4,776 $43,441 572 —81 51,151 —21,203 —764 6,941 3,713 3.778 9,721 —199 1,982 55,743 9,517 83.369 225,0(K)15,000 60.000 9,656 8.081 38,640 216 210 — 2,153 225 1.260 237,025 23,516 99,900 (181.282)(13,999)(16,531) ——— (181,282)(13.999)(16,531) 252,765 93,532 177.479 (71,483)—— $$ 79,533_$ 160.948 N. -72- U Exhibit D-2 1991 I Public 1992 Facilities Improve- Revenue ment Totals Bonds Bonds 1994 1993 $ 213,716 $13,964 $276.204 $270.915 —785 1.438 1.024 —184,197 256,551 425.408 34,611 2.291 44,607 44,045 25,971 25,851 69.034 77.024 3 —2.184 195 274,301 227,088 650.(»18 818,611 165,(KX)85,000 550,000 150,000 229.135 94.123 379.635 403.291 2.056 355 2,837 4.543 —2.881 6.519 4.420 396,191 182.359 938,991 561254 (121.890)44.729 (288.973) 256.357 95,513 _95.513 33.165 ———(241,000) 95.513 —95.5 if (207.835) (26.377)44,729 (193.460)48.522 562.784 532,642 1.619.202 1.570.680 ——(71,483)— $ 536,407 S 577,371 $ 1,354.159 S 1.619.202 -73- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK c. CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Project Funds are used to account tor financial resi'urces to be used for the acquisitii>n or construction of major capital facilities. Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Fund - u.sed to account for state-aid allotments used by the City for improvement projects to designated roads and bridges within the City. Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund - used to account for construction costs prior to obtaining permanent financing. 1991 Public Facilities Construction Fund - used to account for construction co.sts of new City facilities. 1992 Stubbs Bav Sewer Construction Fund - used to account for construction ci>sts of the Stubbs Bay area sanitary sewer system. -74- cm OF QRONO, MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds Q^mbining Balance Sheet As of December 31.1994 (with COmpQiati%’c Totals as of December 31. 1993) Assets Minnesota State-Aid Streets Construction Permanent Improvement Revolving Cash and temporar>’ investments Receivables Accrued interest EXiinquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Due from other funds Restriaed assets Cash and temporarv’ investments Total assets $ 271.825 $ 485.183 36.292 1.399 48.572 $ 271.825 $ 571.446 Liabilities and Fund Bitlance Liabilities Aeaiunts and contracts payable Advances from other funds Deferred revenue Special assessments Spe-cial assessments (>n City property Total liabilities $ 229.988 $ 229.988 2.644 10.043 49.953 6Z640 Fund balance (deficit) Unreserv’cd EXsignated for ruadbridge projects Designated for emergency contingencies Designated for construction Lindesignated Total fund balance ^.837 41.837 320.969 187.837 m8{l6 Touil liabilities and fund balance $ 271.825 $ 571.446 -75- I Exhibit E-1 I 1991 Pirf)lic 1992 Stubbs Bay Facilities Sewer Totals Ccmstructian Construction 1994 1993 $$182.783 $939.791 $771.397 7,157 43.449 31.(KK) —1.399 2.970 ——48.572 62.612 ———1.496 331 $$189.940 $ 1,033.21 L $869.806 $$7.857 $240.489 S 65.358 —10.043 22,981 __49.953 64.628 ———1.495 7.857 3(K).485 1.54.462 178,718 —320.969 46.5.311 ——187.837 230.608 —182.083 223.920 (1.59,293) —182.083 732.726 715.344 $$189.940 S 1.033.211 $869.81)6 -76 iisS CITY OF OROM), MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds CiMnbining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Year Ended December 31,1994 -77- (with Comparative Totals tor Year Ended December 31, 1993) Minnesota State-Aid Permanent Streets Improvemeni Qinstruction Revolving Revalue Taxes Propeny $$230 Special assessments —17.768 IntCTgovemmental State aid for instruction 683.814 — Other Interest earned on investments —26.750 Miscellanius —16,284 Total resenue 683.814 61,032 Expenditures Capital projects Professional sers ices 179.801 37.467 Construaion a>sts 459.462 — Miscellaneous 1.877 — loul expenditures 641,140 37,467 Excess (detlciency) of revenue over expenditures 42,674 23..565 Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in —— Operating transfers (out)—— Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (detlciency) ot revenue and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 42.674 23,565 Fund balance (deficit) Beginning of year (837)485.241 End of year $__41.837 $_5()S.806 'I 1 ! ’f 1 I I I I Exhibit E-2 1 1991 1992 1 ! i 1 1 1 Public Facilities Stubbs Bay Sewer Totals GmstructitHi Q^nstruction 1994 1993 $$$230 $ ■——17.768 23.313 1 —-683.814 1.290 1 11 14.854 41.615 68.173■——16.284 15,478 1 11 14,854 759.711 108,254 1 19.860 237.128 96,400■—21.905 481.367 760,950 —21.614 23.491 76.554■—63.379 741.986 933.904■ ■11 (48.525)17.725 (825.650) 1 _mmm 600.928 ■(34^—(34.3)—1 (343)—(343)600.928 1 (332)(48.525)17,382 (224.722) 1 332 230,608 715.344 940.066 $$ 182.083 $ 732.726 $ 715.3441 1 1 1 _______________________•______________________aM -78- THIS PACE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ % L . r L ^i I I ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds are used to account for the operations of self-supporting activities which render services or goods to the public. The accounting rec('rds are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting. Water Operating Fund - used to account for the provision of water services t(' the residents of the City who have water service available. Sewer Operating Fund - used to acct'unt tor the provision of .sewer services to the residents ot the City who have sanitary sewer service available. Golf Course Operating Fund - used to account for the golf course operation sales and related expenses. -79- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA EiUcrpnsc Funds Combining Balance Shcel As of December 31. 1994 (with Comparative Totals as of December 31. 1993) Waitr Operating Sewer Operating Golf Course Operating Totals 1994 1993 Assets Current assets Cash and temporary investments $ 73.708 S 85.3.171 S 140,334 S UK>7.213 s 1.054.842 Accounts receivable 697 27.3.997 —274.694 205.439 Accrued interest receivable 2.865 30.076 3,358 .36.299 18.105 Delinquent taxes receivable 64T)411 -1.051 - Delinquent special assessments receivable -22.621 —22.621 31.883 Deferred special assessments, current p<^riion 15.205 26.331 —41.556 41.736 Due from other governmental units —21.990 —21.990 — Inventory -—3.599 3.599 4.086 Prepaid items 1.840 28.503 1.228 31.571 — Total current assets 94.055 1.257.120 148.519 1.500.594 1.356.W1 Rcslricled assets Cash and temp<'»rary investments 79.433 727.301 -806.734 .S82.872 Accrued interest receivable 11.779 18.479 —.30.258 18.725 Total restricted assets 91.212 745.780 —836.992 901.597 Other assets, less current portion Deferred special assessments -———41.736 Due from other governmental units —278.461 —278,461 322.308 Discount tin revenue K>nds 6.041 5.900 -11.941 1.3.402 Total other assets 6.041 284..V.1 —290.402 .377.446 IViperty. plant, and equipment Work in prt^gress -2^.5>K —26.558 17.771 Land and improveraenls 57.132 16.210 12“*.977 2''1.319 201.319 Buildings and improvements 786.594 .31.014 48.722 8(.6.33(»866.3.30 Equipment 53.828 83.(»S7 97.284 236.799 194.562 Distribution^collectum system 2.083.577 6,685.138 -8.768.715 8.731.793 Less accumulated depreciation 2.981,131 839.624 6.844.607 2.484.513 273.983 53.553 10.099.721 3.377.690 10.011.775 3.167.090 Net property, plant, and equipment 2.141.507 4,360.094 220.4.30 6.722.031 6.844.68.5 Total assets $ 2.333,715 S 6.647.355 S 368.949 S 9.350.019 $_9.479.819 -so- I f 'I I I I I I il I I II 0 I I I a I I I I I I I Fxhihii F—I Cn>lf U'ater Sewer Course lotals Operating Operating Operating — 1994 1993 Dabilitics anJ Fund Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable S 4.1.V,$5.012 S 446 s 9,594 s 17.(181 Salaries and compensated absences payable 2.74:3.989 1.913 H.M4 7.239 Due to other governmental units 2.876 ——2.87(1 24‘) Total current liabilities 9.754 9.(K)1 2.339 21.114 24.569 Current liabilities payable frimi restricted assets Revenue bonds payable 101.IRn 98.820 -2(K).(KK)175.(KK» Accrued interest payable 20..454 25.740 —52.094 56.589 Deterred developer advances 69.723 20.077 -89.8(K»89.800 lotal current liabilities payable from resincicd assets i‘j7.:s7 144.637 —34I.8>»4 321.38'» Long-lcrra liabilities, less current pi>rlion Revenue bunds payable 885.327 864.673 —1.750.tKW>1.95(1.0(1(1 Com|xnsated absences payable 6.733 11.064 0.806 24.603 22.507 Deferred credits -112.000 -112.(KW 121.540 Total long-lemi liabilities 892.(KiO 987.746 6.806 1.886.612 2.094.047 Total liabilities 1.099.071 1.141.384 9.165 2.249.620 2.440.tX)5 Fund equity Contributed capital 1.076.04S .3.821.893 144.527 5.042.468 5.127.867 Retained earnings Reserved !V>r revenue bond debt service —-—-7.3.166 Unreser\ed 158.596 1.684.078 215.257 2.057.931 1.8.38.781 Total retained earnings 1 58.39<>1.684.078 215.257 2.057.931 1.911.947 Total tund equity 1.234.(.44 5.505.971 359.784 7.1(K).399 7.0.39.814 Total liabilities and fund equity S 6,n47.355 S 368.949 s _jA35('.oi^s_^.479.8 -Kl- Exhibit F-2 cm' OF- ORONO, MINNESOTA lEntcrprise Funds Qunbining StatcnKnt of Revenue, IZxpcnses, and Otanges in Retained Eitmings Year Ended rXetemher 31, 1994 (with Comparative Totals for Year Eiukd December 31. 1993) Sales and cost of sales Sales Cost of sales Gross profit Water Operating $ Sewer Operating -$ Gi>If Course Operating $ 16,158 7,809 8,349 $ Totals I9M4 16,158 7,809 ‘8,349 $ 1993 14.351 8,601 5,750 Operating res’entie Metered water sales User charges Greens fees Equii>ment rental Other Total operating revenue 199,208 3.238 544.471 11.889 202,446 556,360 136,532 31,594 1,8(t8 169.934 199.208 1^44.471 136,532 31.594 16.9.35 928.740 151.798 397,993 112.308 23.751 47.151 7.33.(M)I Total gross profit and operating revenue 202.446 556,360 178,283 937,089 738.751 ^rating expenses Personal services Salaries and wages 68,653 105.163 54.270 228,086 211.802 Retirement contribulitms 8,039 12.365 4,401 24.805 23.557 Health and life insurance contributions 1,845 5,553 3,642 11.(MO 11,061 Purcha.sed water 6,985 -—6,985 11,6.35 Sewer disposal charges —282.592 —282.592 293,536 Professiorul sers'ices 5,960 4.156 1,600 11,716 12,868 Operating and maintenance supplies 8.627 4.322 7.414 20.363 19,866 1 leat. light, and power 25.281 17,409 3,122 45.812 46.630 Depreciation 62.495 145,567 9,258 217,320 202.587 Rent and equipment —-7,336 7.336 7.194 Maintenance and repairs 20,357 24.967 5,264 50,588 43.692 Administrative and other expense Administrative charges from General Fund 5,833 16.550 9,825 32,208 26.610 ('ommunications 2.631 2.836 2.912 8,379 5,147 Office supplies ss• *110 701 866 1,052 Printing, publishing, and advertising 199 511 2.763 3.473 5,028 l)aU priKcssing 3,062 6.807 —9,869 10.142 Insurance 10.137 12.4,83 14,105 36.725 4(1.765 Other expe-nses 1.359 6.219 3,848 11,426 4,806 Total operating expenses l2H,5f8 647.610 ‘ 130,46 r r.0i)9,589 977.978 Operating income (loss)(29.072)(91.250) 47.822 (72.500)(239.227) (continued) -82- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l-Ahihil 1-2 cm’ OF ORONO, %fTNNESOTA Enteqprise Funds Combining Statement of Rex’enue, Expenses, and Changes in RcUnned Earnings (continued) Year Ended December .M. 1994 (with Con^rative Totals for Year Ended December 31. 199,3) Cit>lf Water Sewer Course T«Mji 1 s Operating Operating Operating 1994 1993 NcTnoperaling revenue (expense) Property tax rev’cnuc 34,295 33,281 —67.576 — Interest earned on investments 4,324 87.528 5,582 97,434 95.416 Interest on special assessments 2,356 8,465 —10,821 12.952 Interest income from MWCX'-12.866 —12,866 13.679 Amortization of deferred credits —9,530 —9,530 9.530 Interest expense (64.472)(62.944)—(127.416)(138,255) Revenue bond expense (219)(216)—(435)(419) Loss on sale of assets --(8,774)(8.774)— Total nontfterating resenuc (expense)(23.716)88.510 (3.192)61.602 (7.097) Income (loss) before operating transfers (52.788)(2.740)44.630 (10.898) (246.324) Operating transfers in (out) From 1980 Improvement Bonds Fund ————241.000 From Sewer Operating I'und -———20.088 To Sewer Operating Fund ————(20.088) Total operating transfers in (out)—-——241.(KM) Net income (loss)(52.788)(2.74(1)44,630 (10,898)(5.324) Credit ftrr depreciation on contributed equity 34.873 121.7.‘i5 254 156.882 156,488 Net increase (tkerease) in retained earnings (17.915)119.015 44.8M 145,984 151,164 ReUiincd earnings Beginning of year 176.511 1,565.063 170,373 1,911.947 1,760.783 End of year $ f5S.5%$ 1,684,078 S 2)5,257^$A0 ‘57,9.3L $ 1,911.947 -83- m Exhibit F-3 CTTY OF ORONO, KHNNESOTA Eillerprise Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 1994 (with Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31. 1993) Ck^lf Water Operating Sewer Operating Course Operating Totals 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities Operating income (loss)S (29.072)S (91.250)S 47.822 $(72.500) S (2.39.227) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash pnwided (used) by operating activities Depreciation 62.495 145.567 9.258 217.320 202.587 Amortization of revenue bond discount 739 722 -1.461 1.513 Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable (697)(68.558)—(69.255)7.943 Due from other governmental units —(846)—(846)1.817 Inventory 1.792 —(1..305)487 (62) Prepaid items (1.840) (28.503) (1.228) (31.571) — Increase (decrease) in Compensated absences 626 1.032 418 2.096 (O") Accounts payable (7.395)406 (498)(7.487)(6.790) Accounts payable - restricted --——(2.(Kll) Contracts payable - resincicJ ————(129.090) Salaries payable SIK 730 148 1.405 346 Due to other governmental units 2.627 ——2.627 (8.286) Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 29.793 (40.671)54.615 43.737 (171.400) Cash films from noncapital financing activities Operating transfers m ————261.088 Operating transfers (out)-———(20.088) Net cash proviwkd by noncapital financing activities —““241.0U0 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Residual equity transfer in 71.483 ——71.483 — Taxes collected for revenue bond debt 33.655 32.870 —66.525 — Special assessments for revenue K)nd dei^17.561 44.437 -61.998 4'.803 Acquisition or construction of capital assf ♦(1.3.712)(60.470)(29.258)(103.440)(77.8S4) MWee current value credit -35.569 -35.569 35..347 Principal paid on revenue N>nds (R8.533)(86.467)—(175.(KK))(175.(HK1) Interest paid on revenue K^nds (66.734)(65.177)—(131.911)(142.726) Other charges on revenue bonds (219)(216)-_(419) Net cash used by capital and related financing activities (4^1.409)(<•9 454)(29.258)(175.211)(312.849) (continued) -84- I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I Fxhibil F-3 CITY OF ORONO, MINNE.SOTA F-nterprise Funds Combmmg Slalemenl of Cash Flows (continued) Year Ended December 31, 1994 (with Comparative Ti>lals for Year Ended December 31, 1993) CnMf Water Sewer Course Totals Operating Operating Operating 1994 19 ‘>3 Cash flows fiDin investing activities Interest received on investments 2.940 60.963 3.804 67.707 119.031 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (13.766)(79.162)29.161 (63.767)(i:4.:i,«' Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year 166.‘)0"1.659.6.34 111.173 1.9.37.714 2.061.932 End of year S 133.141 S 1..3H0.472 S 140.3.34 5 1.K73.647 S 1.‘>.37.714 Cash and cash equivalents UnresU’icted ^ash and temporary investments S 73.708 S 853.171 S 140.334 S 1.067.213 S 1,054.842 Restricted cash and temporary investments 7U.433 727.301 806,734 882.872 Total cash and cash equivalents S 1^3,14j^S 14q3^^S l ,87Jt,ujr^ v Noncash operating items (golf course) During the year ended December 31. R>04. the City traded in equipment with an adjusted NH>k value of SlO.074. Equipment Original price Accum u 1 ated deprec ial ii >n Adjusted Kx>k value Less trade-in value Loss on sale of equipment S 16.704 6.720 10.074 (1,300) S 8.774 -85. CITY OF QRONO, MINNESOTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of Dumber 31.1994 and 1993 Assets Current assets Cash and tempi>rar>’ investments Aca^unts receivable Accrued interest receivable Delinquent taxes receivable Defen ed special assessments, current portion Inventory Prepaid items Total current assets Restricted assets Cash and temporary investments Debt service Construaion Total cash and temprirar>- im estments AciTucd interest receivable Debt service Construaion Total acc'ucd interest receivable Total restricted assets Other assets IDeferred special assessments Discount revenue bimds Ti>tal other assets Property, plant, and equipment Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Equipment Distribution'collection svstem Less accumulated depreciatii>n Net property, plant, and equipment ToUil assets -86- 91.212 6,041 6.041 57.132 786.594 53.828 2.083,577 2.981.131 839.624 2.141.507 1994 1993 $ 73.708 S 57.640 697 — 2.865 1,511 640 — 15,205 15.205 —1.792 1.840 — 94.955 76.148 79.433 103.288 —5.979 79,433 109.267 11.779 3.608 —8.141 fl.779 11.749 121.016 15.205 6,780 21.985 57.132 786.594 40.116 2.083,577 2.967.419 777.129 2.190.290 1-.-?^3.715. $J.409,4.39 . t . I k- I I I I I 6 I I Jjabilitics and Fund Equity Cunent liabilities Current liabilities payable fh>m restricted assets Revenue Kmds payable Accrued interest payable - revenue bc»nds Deferred developer advances Total current liabilities payable from • •’’•icted assets 1994 101.180 26.354 69.713 19T.257 Exhibit F-4 1993 Acaiunts payable $4.136 $11.531 Salaries and aimpensatcd absences payable 2.742 2,224 Due to other governmental units 2.876 249 Total current liabilities 9,754 14.(Hr4 88.5.30 28.616 69.723 186.869 IjL>ng-tcrm liabilities, less current p»>rtion Revenue Kinds ptiyable Compensated ab^^ cnees payable Touil long-term liabilities Total liabilities 885.327 6.733 892.060 1,099.071 986.510 6.102 '992.617 1.193.490 Fund equity Contributed capital Reuiined earnings Reserv ed tor revenue Kind debt sers iee Unreserved Touil renined earnings ToUil fund equity 1.076.048 158.596 158..^96 1.234.644 1,039.438 8.557 1^.954 _176.511 1.215.949 Touil liabilities and tund equity $2..333.715 $ 2.409.439 -87- Exhibit F-5 CITY OFORONO. MINNESOTA Water Operating Fund Cxunparativie Statement of Revenue. Exp>en5;c.^, and Granges m Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31. 1994 and 1993 Operating transfers in From Seuer Operating Fund f-rom Improvement Bi'nds Fund Tina! operating transfers in Net income (loss) Credit for depreciation on contributed equity Increase (decrease) in rctaiivjd eamuigs Retained earnings Beginning c\ year Fiid of vear -KS. 1094 l‘»*)3 Cperaiing rrvpiTOe Metered water sales S S 151.7‘>X Other 3.2?X 3..32X Total operating R^’enuti 202.446 ^ 1.V5.126 Operating expenses f Salaries and wages 68.653 60.079 Retirement contributions 8.039 7.248 i Health and life insurance contributimis 1.845 .3.121 Purchased water 6.985 11.6.35 » Professional services 5.96f).3.480 < Operating and mamtenance supplies K.627 7.052 i Heat, light, and power 25.2X1 25.751 Depreciatum 62.495 4X.3'3 1 Mainlen*«ce and nrpairs 20.35^6.8'") Administraii\^ charges from General Fund 5.X33 5.85 m Communications 2.631 1.967 t OlTice supplies 55 311 ! Printing, publishing, and advertising 199 84 Data priK'essing 3.062 3.437 Insurance 10.1.37 11.199 Other expenses 1.359 1.141 1Tt>tal operating expenses 231.5 IX 198.327 0|’»erating loss (29.n72)(43,4(11) !N(^opcrating revenue (expense) Property taxes .34.295 — Interest income on special assessments Interest earned m invesimoits 2.356 .3.535 ! Debt Serv ice 461 1.582 i Operatii)ns 3.X63 2.215 Construction —2.920 Interest expense on revenue bi>nds (64.472) (69.931) i • Revenue bond expense _____ I'otal nont^peraling revenue (expense)(2.3.71())(59.891) Ijoss before »operating transfers in (52.788)(10.3.292) 20.0HS 122.000 -142.08S (52.788) .34.873 33.32‘^ (17.915)72.125 176.511 1(14.386 S 158.596 S JlO-51 1 L L 1 ■j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit F-6 OIY OF CmONO, MINNESOTA Water Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows Years ^ded December 31. 1994 and 1993 Cash flow's from operating activities Operating loss ^justments to rea>ncilc operating loss t<^ net cash provided (used) by i>perating aaivities Depreciation Amortization of revenue K>nd disci>unt Change in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Aca^unts receivable Due horn other go\ emmental units Inventorx ’ Prepaid items Increase (decrease) in Compensated absences Aewunts payable Accounts payable - restricted Contracts payable - restricted Salaries payable Due to other govemmenul units Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flow's tri'm noncapital financing activities Operating transfers in Cash flows from aipital and related financing activities Residual equity transfer in Taxes wllected for revenue Kind debt Special assessments collected tor re\ enue bond debt Acquisition or constmaion of capital assets Principtil ptiid on revenue Kinds Interest paid on revenue bonds Other charges on revenue nonds Net cash used by capiral and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents Bc'ginning of year End of Year -89- 1994 62.495 739 (697) 1.792 (1.840) 626 (7.395) 518 2.627 29.793 71.483 33.655 17.561 (13.712) (88.533) (66.734) _._(2J9) (46.499) 2.940 166.907 1993 $ (29.072) $ (43.401) 48.373 765 2.630 30 (91) 8.503 (2.(M)1) (129.090) 206 (8.216J (122.292) 142.088 18.740 (70.816) (88.530) (72.205) (213.023) 8.614 (13,766) (184.613) 351,520 $153,141 $ 166.907 CriY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Balance Sheet As of Dxember 31.1994 and 1993 Assets Current assets Cash and temporar>* investments Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Delinquott taxes receivable IDelinquent special assessments receivable Deferred special assessments, current portion Due from other governmental units Prepaid items Tinal current assets Restriaed assets Cash and tempi'rary investments Debt ser\ ice Construtnion Ti>tal cash and tempi>rary investments Accrued interest receivable Debt serv ice Construction ToLil accrued interest receivable ToUil restricted assets Other assets, less current pi^rtion Deferred special assessments Due from other govemmenuil units Discount on revenue btinds Total other assets Property, plant, and equipment Work in progress Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Equipment Distributiim/collection system Less aceumulated depreeiation Net property, plant, and equipment Total assets 1994 1993 $ 853,171 $ 886.029 273.997 205.439 30,076 15.014 411 — 22,621 31.883 26.351 26.531 21.990 21.144 28.503 — 1,257,120 1.186.rU0 38,645 109.489 688.656 664.116 727.301 773.605 3.200 3.170 15.279 3.806 18.479 6.97^ 745.780 780.581 26.531 278.461 301,164 5.900 6,622 284.361 334.317 26.558 17.771 16.210 16.210 31.014 31.014 85.687 70.926 6.685,138 6.648.216 6.844,6()7 6.784,137 2.484.513 2.338.946 4.360.094 4,445,191 $ 6.647.355 S 6.746.129 -90- I I I I I I il il !l I I r I I I I j 1 I I I I I I I I I Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Aco>unts payable Salaries and o>nipensated absences payable Total current liabilities Current liabilities payable from restricted assets Revenue bonds payable Accrued interest payable - revenue Kinds Deferred devekiper achances Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets Long-term liabilities, less current p^irtion Revenue bonds pyable Compensated absences payable Difentd credits - MWCC Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities $ 1994 5,012 3,989 9,001 98,820 25,740 20,077 144,637 864,673 11,064 11 2,(M)9 987J46' Exhibit F-7 1993 $4,606 3,250 7'856 86,470 27,973 20,077 134,520 1,141,384 963,490 10,012 121,540 1,095,042 1,237.418 Fund equity Contributed capital Reuiined ciimings Reserx ed tor revenue Kmd debt serx iee Unreserved Touil retained earnings Total fund equity 3,821,893 1,684,078 1,684,078 5,505,971 3,943.648 64,609 1^50^454 i,565,063 5,508,711 Total liabilities and fund equity S 6.647.355 S 6,746.129 -91- Cm^OFORONO, KflNNF^TA Sewer Operating Rmd CoiTiparativc Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 Operating revenue User charges Interest cn accounts certified to county Other Total operating revenue Operating expenses Salanes mJ wages Retirement cantTibuiicns Health and life insurance cditributicns Sewer disposal charges Professuxial services Operating and maintenance supplies Heal, light, and power Depreciation Maintenance and repairs Administrative charges from Genc*ral l\md Communicaticxis Office supplies Pnnting. publishing, and advertising Data processing Insurance Other expenses Total (^Krating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenue (expense) Property taxes Interest earned on investments Debt service Operations Constructidi Interest income on spcci. 1 assessments Interest income frenn MW( C' AroortizaticTi of deferred credits Interest expense in revenue Knds Revenue Nnd expense Total mxiiyKTating rev# .„e (expense) Ix>ss bef ve operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers (mtt Ti'tal iperating iransfers in (luit) Net loss Credit for depreciatim in cmtnbuted equity Increase in retained earnings Retained earnings Beginning of year l*nd of vear Exhibit F-8 vm 1‘8).5 $ 544.471 $.507.90.5 4..V7 4.W>6 .58.596 5.56..VH)441.255 95.«XI 12..V>5 11.502 5.55.5 4.675 282.592 20.5.5.V) 4.1.V>7.8.58 4..-«22 8.452 17.409 17.445 145..507 14(,.540 24.967 27.945 10.5.50 16.2.50 2.8.56 1.612 110 40(> 511 141 6.807 6.705 12.48.5 15.286 6.219 1.82.5 M7.6'io 655.8.55 (91.2.50)(2I4.5XOJ .5.5.281 - 462 1.(48 49.040 4().X50 .57.117 .5,5.611 8.465 0.417 12.8f)6 1.5.679 0.5.50 9.5.50 (62.044)((.8.524) (2U>)(207) 88.510 48.21.5 (2.740)(1(>()..567) 110,(HK) —(20.088) -9X.012 (2.740)(67.455) 121.755 122.905 119.015 55.4.50 1..565.06.5 1..509.61.5 S 1.684,078 S 1.565,(163 Ie- -92- I Exhibit F-9 OTY OF QRONO, MINNESOTA Sewer Operating Fund G>mparative Statement of Cash FIi>ws Years Ended December 31,1994 and 1993 1994 1993 Cash flop’s from operating activities Operating k>ss $ (91.250)$ (214.580) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used by operating activities Depreciation 145,567 146..549 Amortization of revenue bond discount 722 748 Change in assets and liabilities (Inaease) deacase in Accounts receivable (68.558)2.415 Due from other governmental units (846)(HI.4) Prepaid items (28,503)— Increase (decrease) in Compensated absences 1,052 109 Accounts payable 406 (11,446) Salaries payable 739 (174) Due to other government;!) units — Net cash used by operating activities (40,67 ij (77.262) Cash flows from mmcapital financing acnivities Operating transfers in —119.0(H) (^■rating transfers (out)—(20.088) 98.912Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capiml and related financing activities Taxes collected for revenue bond debt 32.870 — Special assessments cx'lleeted for revenue bond debt 44,437 29.063 Acquisition or constructiim of capita! iissets (60,470) (6.040) M\VCC current value credit 35,569 35,347 Principal payments on revenue bonds (86.467)(86.470) Interest paid on revenue bonds (65.177) (70.521) Other charges on revenue bonds (210 . 1207) Net cash used by cjipital and related fin;mcing activities (99.454)(98.828) (continued) I -93- Exhibit F-9 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Sewer Operating Fund Comparative Statement of Cash Flows (a>ntinucd) Years Ended December 31.1994 and 1993 1994 1993 Cash flows from investing activities Interest received on investments 60.963 105,073 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (79.162)27.895 Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year 1.659.634 1,631.739 End of year $ 1.580.472 $ 1.659.634 -94- I I I I I I I I CTTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Q^mparative Glance Sheet As of December 31.1994 and 1993 Assets Current assets Cash and tanporar>' investments Accrued interest receivable Inventory Prepaid items Total current assets Property, plant, and equipment Land and improvements Buildings and improx'cmcnts Equipment Less accumulated depreciation Net property, plant, and equipment Total assets Exhibit F-10 1994 $ 140.334 3,358 3,599 1,228 148.519’ 127.977 48,722 97,284 273.983 53.553 220.430 1993 $ 111.173 1.580 2.294 "Ti57)47' 127.977 48.722 83.520 260.219 51.015 209.204 $ 368.949 $ 324.251 Liabilities and Fund Equity Current liabilities Aca>unts payable Salaries and compensated absences piiyable Totil current liabilities $446 1.913 2J59 $944 1.765 2.'709 Long-term liabilities Qimpensated absences payable Total liabilities 6,806 9.165 6.388 9,097 Fund equity Qintributed capittl Retiined earnings Totil tiind equity Total liabilities and fund equity 144.527 215.257 ‘359.784 144.781 170.373 315,154 $ 368.949 $ 324.251 -95- Exhibit F-11 CfiY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Golf Course Operating Fund Cemparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings Years Ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 -96- 1994 1993 Sales and cost of sales Sales $ 16,158 S 14,351 Cost of sales 7.80U 8.601 Gross profit 8,349 5,750 operating revenue Greens fees 136,532 112.308 Equipment rental 31,594 23,751 oier 1,808 561 Total operating revenue 169.Q34 136.620 Total gross profit and operating revenue 178,283 142,370 Operating expenses Salaries and wages 54,270 56,123 Retirement contributions 4.401 4,807 Health and life insurance contributions 3,642 3,265 Professional services 1.600 1,550 Operating and maintenance supplies 7.414 3.462 Heat, light, and power 3,122 3,434 Depreciation 9,258 7.665 Rent and equipment 7,336 7.194 Maintenance and rc-pairs 5,264 8,848 Administrative charges Irom General I'und 9,825 4,530 Communications 2.912 1.568 Office supplies 701 245 Printing, publishing, and advertising 2,763 4,803 Insurance 14.105 14,280 Other expenses 3,848 1.842 Ti>tal operating expenses 130,460 —123,616 Operating income 47,822 18.754 Nonoperating revenue (expense) Interest earned on investments 5,582 — Loss on sale of assets (8.774)4,581 Total nonoperating revenue (expense)(3.192)4,581 Net income 44.630 23.335 Credit for depreciation on contributed equity 254 254 Increase in retained earnings 44,884 23,58^^ Retained earnings Beginning of year 170,373 146,784 End of year $ 21.^257 170,373 ( ' j CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Exhibit F-12 I Gi>lf Qnirse Operating Fund Q>mparativc Statement of Cash Fli>ws Years ^ded December 31.1994 and 1993 Cash flows from operating activities Operating inwme Adjustments to rca^cile operating ina>me to net cash provided by operating activities 1994 1993 $ 47.822 S 18.754 Depreciation 9,258 7,665 Qiange in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in Accounts receivable —5.528 Inveiitory (1,305)(92) Prepaid items (1,228)— Increase (decrease) in Compe nsated absences 418 (168) Accounts payable (498)(3,847) Salaries payable 148 314 Net cash provided by operating activities 54,615 28,154 Cash flows tri>m oipital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets (29,258) (998) Cash flews ttom investing activities Interest received on investments 3,804 5,344 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 29,161 32,500 Cash and cash a^uivalents Beginning of year 111,173 78,673 End of year $ 140,334 $ 111,173 Noncash operating items During the year ended December 31, 1994, the City traded in equipment with an adjusted btxik value of $10,074. Equipment (>iginal price Accumulated depreciation Adjusted bu^k value Less trade-in value Diss on sale of equipment $ 16.794 6,720 10,074 jyjooj $__8J_74_ -97 *i'C i s% »; r-;'-V,,I » r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRUST AND AGENCY FVSDS Trust Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. Flexible Benefit Plan Fund - used to account for employee participatiim in the cafeteria plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Cinle § 125. Agency Funds are used to account t*)r a.s.sets held by the City in an agent capacity for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units, or other funds. Deferred Compensation Agency Funds - IC.M.A Fund, Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund, Great West Life Insurance Company Fund, and USCM/PEBSCO Fund - used to account btr employee deferred compensation plans created in accitrdance with Internal Revenue Code 457. i -98- [Exhibit G-1 CITY OF QRONO, MINNESOTA Trust and Agencj’ Funds Q^nbining Balance Sheet As of December 31.1994 (%-ith Cc«npurativc Totals as of December 31, 1993) Expendable Trust Flexible Benefit Plan Agency Totals Deferred Compensation Funds 1994 1993 Assets Cash and investments held bv trustee $ -$ 616.600 $_$ 511.742 Dabilities Deferred a>mpensation payable to employees $”$ 616.600 $ 616.6fK) $ 5J 1,742 I [ -99- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit G-2 CTTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Flexible Benefit Plan Expendable Trust Fund Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Years Ended December 31,1994 and 1993 1994 1993 Reveir*5 Payroll »»’ithlx>ldings for Flexible Benefit Plan $ 51,491 $ 60,830 Expenditures Miscellaneous Employee benefits 51,491 60.830 Excess of rex enue over expenditures —— Fund balance Beginning of year End of year $$ -100- QTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Agency Funds Combining Sutemcnt of Cbanges in Assets and Liabilities Year Ended December 31.1994 Pefeired Compeasatioa Agency F"und (ICMA) Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees Deferred Compensation Agency Fund (Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund) Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees Deferred Compensation Agency I'und (Great West Life Insurance Company> Assets Cash and investments held bv trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees $ ft9,162 $ 5 5 <^9^62 $ -101- Exhibit Cf-3 Balance Balance January 1,December 31, 1994 Additions Deductions 1994 $ 92.865 $_L9^ $ _2,6S9 S 92,116 $ 92.865 S 1,940 $ 2,689 $ 92.116 S J S $24 ,630 I $____279 $24,630 $_429^()2_!. S ‘*r_9J[)21 (continued) f • i i i I I i i I I Cl ry OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities (continued) Year Ended December 31, 1994 Deferred CompcBs atioii Agency Fund VUS^/PEBSCO Fund) Assets Cash and investments held by trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable »o employees All Agency Funds Assets Cash and investments held bv trustee Liabilities Deferred compensation payable to employees -102- Exhibit (i-3 Balance Balance January 1,lX‘cember31, 1994 Additions Deductions 1994 $ 40.399 $ 30,750 $_ _.116 S 70,833 $ 40,399 $ 30,750 $____3|6 $ 70.8.V3 $ 3,28 4 L^lh7^-S 5 J,284 $ 616,600 i. S|• THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANTv I I I I I m ■f *?--v5 %T-f.: -L..c__ II I I I I I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Qunparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by St>urce December 31,1994 and 1993 Genera] fixed assets Land and land improvements Buildings and building improvements Equipment Total general fixed assets im’estment in general fixed assets by source General Fund after December 31,1984 Special Revenue Funds after December 31.1984 Capital Pn>ject Funds after December 31,1990 Donations after December 31,1984 Years prior to January 1,1985 Total investment in genera! fixed assets Schedule 1 1994 1993 $ 1.239.796 $ 1.129.796 3,205.130 3.210.130 1,303,129 1,192,284 $ 5,748,055 $ 5,532.210 $ 143.921 $ 131.710 754.192 545.558 3,989.224 3,989.224 4.025 4,025 856.693 861.693 $ 5.748.055 $ 5.532.210 I -103- Schedule 2 CTTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Schedule of General Fixed Assets By Functk>n and Activity December 31.1994 Function and Activity Land and Land Improvements Buildings and Building Improvements Equipment Total General gm'emment Council $C —$3,868 $3.868 Administration --27,685 27.685 Dcaions ——24,476 24.476 Assessing ——2,695 2.695 FinaiKe ——26,198 26.198 Government buildings 696,358 1,999,912 145.919 2.842.189 Total general government 696,358 1.999,912 230.841 2.927.111 Public safety Police ——290.235 290.235 Protective inspection and a>ning ——46,737 46.737 Emergency preparedness ——29.155 29.155 Animal control ——238 238 Total public safety ——366.365 366.365 Streets —1.178.319 614.210 1.792,529 Parks 215.389 1.899 91,713 309,001 Other — unclassified 328,049 25,00()—353,049 Total general fixed assets S 1.239.796 $ 3.205,130 SJ_i3_03J21$ 5.748.055 -104- II I I I I I I I I I I I I I J J l| J Schedule 3 I OIY CfF ORONO, MINNESOTA Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets By Function and Activity Year Ended December 31.1994 -105- Function and Activity General Fixed Assets January 1, 1994 Additiems Deletions General Fixed Assets Devember 31 1994 General government Council $8.868 $S 5,000 $3.868 Administration 27.420 265 —27.685 Elections 24.476 ——24.476 Assessing 2.695 ——2.695 Finance 23.325 3,214 341 26.198 Govemme.it buildings 2.842.189 ——2.842.189 Total general government 2.928.973 3.479 5.341 2.927.111 Public safety Police 274.010 42.261 26.(»36 290.235 Protective inspection and zoning 36.221 10.516 —46.737 Emergency preparedness 29.155 ——29,155 Animal txmtrol 238 ——238 ToL'il public siifety 339.624 52.777 26.()36 366.365 Streets 1.715.133 106.612 29.216 1,792.529 Parks 195.431 113.570 —309.001 Other - unclassitled 353.049 —353.049 Total general fixed assets $ 5,532.210 $ 276.438 $ 60.593 $ 5,74^.055 CJJY OF ORONO, NfINNTSOTA Future Properly Tax Levies to Retire Bt>nds (1) As of December > 1, 19^4 Schedule 4 Year llectible 1982 Improvemeat Bonds 1985 Improvement Bonds 1989 Water and Sewer Revenue Bt>nds 1991 Public Facilities Revenue B<mds 1992 Improvement Bonds lotal Levies 1995 $5,500 (2)$50.000 0)$ 80,000 (4)$ 250,000(5)S 18,000 (6)$ 401.^ OO 1996 700 50,000 --—^0,700 1997 600 50,000 -——50,600 1998 500 50,000 m •——50,500 1999 —50,000 -——50,000 2000 —50,000 -——50.000 7,.^00 $ .100,000 ; 8oj)oo $ 25pj)00,L^jOpt)$ 65 5,..^ 00 (1)llie levies for these issues arc the general obligation property Uix levies which are in addiliem to the amounts levied in the special assessment rolls. Tax levies are placed (as required by law) at 105^? of debt service requirements. (2)The City levied $5,500 for the 1982 Improvement Bonds due to a projected shi^rtfall prior to 1995. Ilie ('ity will continue to monitor the issue and levy additional taxes as required to generate sufficient sources to pay future debt requirements. (3)llie City levied $50,0(K) for the 1985 Imprmement Bonds due to the asses.smcnl appeals and subsequent reductions of deferred assessments. In 1988, the City established future taxes to generate sufficient sources to pay future debt requirements as required b\ law. (4)'Ihe City levied $8(),()0() for the 1989 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds due to a shortfall in revenues. Projerted development has not occurred, therefore user fees and property taxes are required to meet debt service payments. The City will monitor the issue levy additional taxes as required. In addition, certain excess funds were transferred from the 1980 Ini*' iivement Bond I*und to be used to fully meet the debt service requirements of the 1989 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. (5)Ibe City levied $250,00(J for the 1991 l^iHic l acililies Revenue Bonds for the 1995 lease-purchase payments, llie appropriation for th' levy is made annually and is anticipated to cover approximately 55'? of the lease-purchase payment. (6)ITie nty levied $18,000 for the 1992 Imprmement Bonds. The bonds are to U* paid TO'? from special assessments levied, and up to 30'? to be levied in taxes. IVepayments of special assessments and interest earned thereon will determine the amount of taxes required from year to year. .106- -fV,*•Stattotieal S«etion t .. ^t I 1 STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) OTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Revenue by Source (1) (!) Includes General. Special Revenue, and Debt Se^ .'ice Funds. cal Year Property Taxes Special Assessments Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Ckirges for Sen-ices 1985 $ 891,422 $$ 102,811 $ 453,488 $473.850 1986 (2)988,547 —102,533 525,735 605,(H)2 1987 1,106,603 —136,420 499.864 594,424 1988 1,170,411 —124.334 489,319 643,151 1989 1,211,541 —148.564 493,385 685,952 1990 1,637,643 —136,552 135.512 758,369 1991 1,682.260 —81.202 178,901 726.118 1992 1.842.320 327,053 (3)129.365 316.87 1 781.235 1993 1,818,753 425,408 165.897 497.165 866.034 1994 1,922,775 257,175 147.888 539.226 851,165 (2)Reflects the adoption of Govemmenuil Accounting Suindards Bsiard Statement No. 6, eliminating Special Assessment Fund T\pc.Debt Scrv'icc Fun»is were established to account for general isbligation debt previously recorded in Special Assessment Funds. (3)Prior to December 31, 1992. special assessment revenue .ind inierest income was included in other revenue. -107- n \ i w.. iw.. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Tabic 1 Fines and Forfeits Interest Earned on Investments Other Revenue Total $ 61,611 1i257,624 S; 2,240,806 84,877 —1,028.474 3,335,168 102,058 —717,467 3,156,836 140.657 —706.247 3.274,119 125.357 —676,838 3.341,637 108.231 —637.446 3.413.753 72,728 —504.819 3.246.02S 62,458 28Z582 (3)72.623 (3)3,814.507 61,491 254/)54 71.948 4.160.7.50 58.158 286,435 170.500 4.233.322 -108- cny OF ORONO. Minnesota General Expenditures by Function (1) (1)Includes General. Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds. Fiscal Year General Gervemment Public Safety Streets Parks and RecTcation Unalkxated and Other 1985 $ 408.354 $ 946.828 $ 306,479 $43.659 $38.949 1986 (2)458.631 1,089.627 461,855 46.656 126.389 1987 535.558 1.187.328 385,422 94.114 63.154 1988 589.137 1.247.623 344.407 61.582 67.160 1989 655.987 1.376.323 494.742 32.961 95.164 1990 683.176 1.419.419 471.420 48.129 106.778 1991 652.105 1.508.485 474..e50 44,791 165.228 1992 596.138 1.562.709 463.710 53.590 148.908 1993 656.849 1.609.867 495.983 58.080 152.547 1994 667.018 1.616.087 485.491 55.739 171.729 (2)Retleas the adoption ot CknemmenutI Accounting Suindtrds Board Suitement No. 6. eliminating Special Assessment Fund Type. Debt Sere iee Funds were esLiblished to acceeunt tor general lebligaticn debt previously recorded in Special Asse ssment FuniLs. r i -109- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Debt Service Capital Outlay Table 2 Total $ 42.241 $ 107,698 $ 1,894,208 743,450 95,240 3,021,848 678,773 70,614 3.014.963 534,876 92,198 2,936.983 475.520 131,437 3.262.134 426.393 259,921 3,415.236 406.266 46.147 3,297.372 403.209 164,708 3,392.972 562.254 48,483 3.584.063 938,991 201,192 4.136.247 -no- cnr OF ORONO, Minnesota Property Tax Levies and Q^lleenions Fiscal Year Collected Certified Tax Levy for Fiscal Period (1) Current Tax G41ections(lX2) Percent of Levy Qillected Delinquent Tax Collections (2) Total Collections as a Percent of Current Levy 1985 $ 1,001,056 $%7,543 96.7 7($ 36,949 100.3 9? 1986 1,089,634 1,060,820 97.4 36,316 1(K).7 1987 1,246,520 1.218,410 97.7 28.478 100.0 1988 1.293,426 1.257,297 97.2 27.998 99.4 1989 1,382,690 1,332,632 96.4 30,844 98.6 1990 1,638,246 1,579,616 96.4 41.984 99.0 1991 1,713,541 1,638.621 95.6 37.233 97.8 1992 1,961,381 1,902.394 97.0 39.181 99.0 1993 2,120.835 2.080.775 98.1 68.246 101.3 1994 2,281,570 2.246,902 98.5 53,629 100.8 (1)Tiiuil uix levy and current tax aMlections include the Suae paid Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA)’. (2)Includes County adjustments tor abatements, cancellations, and additions of taxes. -Ill- I I » • ! i 1 ^I I I I Outstanding Delinquent Taxes $ 90,476 63,690 45,770 53,658 64.866 71,166 86,352 128,786 123.136 81,796 Table 3 Outstanding Delinquent Taxes as a Percent of Current Levy 9.0 7c 5.8 3.7 4.1 4.7 4.3 5.0 6.6 5.8 3.6 -112- CCJ CITY OF ORONO. MLNNESOTA Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable ftoperty (1) Real Property Personal Property Fiscal Dispiirities Adjustment Taxes Payable Year Assessed Value or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value Assessed V'alue or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity 1985 $ 100.314.576 $ 383.130,000 $ 1,430.696 $ 3.327.200 $ 331,361 1986 98,788.864 385.901.800 1,542.969 3.588.500 446,042 1987 101.291,782 402.896.400 1.678.677 3.903.900 581.055 1988 105.021.213 431.023.100 1.596.719 3.713.300 796.738 1989 (2)14.049,094 477.834^80 183.499 3.495.200 119.216 1990 12.568,353 527.34 S.000 172.131 3.401.800 151.730 1991 14.035.873 585.697.300 178.110 3.598.200 164.776 1992 12.922,819 604.793.4(H)195,919 4.124.600 45.844 1993 11,572.538 625.445.300 182.211 3,876.800 15.389 1994 12,780.145 654.919.200 194.020 3.992.500 62.597 (1)All property, assessed, tax capacity, and estimated market values, and fiscal disp:mties adjustmem are from the Hennepin County Assessor. (2)Beginning with taxes pyable in 19S9. the termim^logy for Assessed Valuations and Mill Rites is no longer used. Tax Capacity replaces Assessed Valuations and is detemiincd in the same manner except using smaller percentages for each property class. -113- t i »i' f II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Tabic 4 Total Assessed Value or Tax Capacit>’ 100.777,875 103.551.514 107,414,670 14.351.809 12.892J14 14.378,759 13.164,582 11.739.360 12.911,568 Estimated Market Value $ 102,076,633 $ 386,457200 389,490.300 406.8(K)300 434.736.4(X) 481,329.780 530.749.800 589.295,500 608,918.000 629,322.100 658.911.700 Ratio of Total Assessed Value or Tax Capacity to Total Estimated Market Value 26.41 9^ 25.87 25.46 24.71 2.98 2.43 2.44 2.16 1.87 1.96 Per Capita Val uations Assessed Estimated V'alue or Market Tax Capacity Value $ 14.541 14.052 14.358 14.747 1.945 1.787 1,969 1,803 1.602 1.749 $ 55.051 54.307 56.406 59.684 65.230 73.582 80.692 83.379 85.327 89.283 -114- cm* OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Property Tax Rales - Direct and 0%erlapping OoN’cnunents (1) (Per $1,000 of Assessed Value or Tax Capacity) Qty of Orono 1985 1980 1982 1991 1992 (•')(•^) Taxes Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Water Sewer Payable General Service Service Service Service Service Operating Operating Year Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund TcMal 1985 9.78 9.78 1986 10.85 —•——-——10.85 1987 11.68 0.59 -•----12.07 1988 11.76 0.28 -—----12.04 1989 (2)9.42 0.21 --—---9.65 1990 12..56 0.27 0.14 —----12.77 1991 11.45 0.28 0.12 0.04 —- --11.87 1992 12.02 0.56 0.12 0.04 1.69 ———14.25 1995 15.26 0.57 0.12 0.04 1.83 0.12 -—15.74 1994 15.45 0.55 —0.04 1.75 0.12 0.29 0.27 16.25 Certain areas of the City are scTved by other schixil districts. Property in those areas w\nild lx- subject to one of the following rales instead ol the rale for ISD#278. Taxes Parable ^'ear ISD#276 ISD #277 ISD #284 1985 55.95 49.75 46.51 1986 58.67 57.52 51 ..T<5 1987 bl..*!.*;55.56 49.88 1988 65.95 57.06 57.58 1989 (2) 5806 47.92 50.56 1990 .«;2.55 42..T5 49.77 1991 .‘:5.56 45.78 50.28 1992 64.02 .*56.15 58.55 1995 74.18 58.97 64.91 1994 76.51 66.98 59.67 (2)Beginning with Uixes payable in 1*^89, the terminology for /\ssessed Valu;itions and Mill R;»tes is longer usc-d. Tax ( apacity replaces Assessed V'aluations and is determined in the Sitme m:mncr except using smaller percenUiges for each property class. Tax lixtension Rates are determined in a similar nuinner to Mill K;ites in that the tax levy is divided by the Uix capjicity. (.1)General obligation water and sewer revenue bond debt. -115- f I Table 5ISD#278SchoolDistrict (1)AreaVo-TcchSchool HennepinCounty MetroCouncil/Transit OtherSpecialDistricts Total 53.54 1.49 29.26 3.88 1..36 99.31 59.51 1.54 29.69 3.80 2.16 107.53 55.08 1.42 29.36 3.90 2.19 104.02 59.50 1.49 31.67 4.05 2.28 111.03 50.01 1.22 27.10 3.41 2.05 93.42 47.17 1.10 27.92 3.72 2.03 94.71 52.74 1.05 30.11 4.11 3.39 103.27 59.80 0.51 .34.33 4.48 1.66 115.01 67.19 1.10 .35.84 4.40 2.31 126.58 65.03 0.81 37.44 4.42 2.15 126.10 -116- OIY ORONO, MINNESOTA Special Assessments Levies and Collections Fiscal Year Current Assessments Due Current Assessments Collected Ratio of Current Collections to Amount Due Delinquent Assessments Collected 1985 $ 375,403 $ 313,670 83.6 $ 40,196 1986 362,515 321,142 88.6 25,765 1987 296,702 262.268 88.4 23.446 1988 257,154 216,503 84.2 68,506 1989 208,158 183.261 88.0 17.604 1990 222,063 198,202 89.3 35.565 1991 228,169 213.418 93.5 14.419 1992 200,477 183.375 91.5 18,390 1993 387.230 355.530 91.8 9.338 1994 294.073 274.403 93.3 23.295 I -117- r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 6 Special Assessments Delinquent $ 159,058 136302 147,635 90,023 61.562 43,766 43,313 54.657 55,507 55.159 Total Outstanding Assessments $ 2,047,811 1.247,407 1,021,321 764,234 663.372 735,609 581.048 1.639,996 1.277,078 1,027.451 -118- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 iL.J i- i Table 7 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Computation of Leg-».l Debt Margin IX cembcr 31.1994 Minncst>ta state law defines a city's legal debt margin as 2.0Cr of its estimated actual property valuation, less all bonds repayable solely fh^n tax levies, plus all sinking funds on hand to retire s;ud debt. Rised cm this formula, the City's leg^ debt margin is as follows: I Estimated total market siilue of taxable property Debt limit (2.09^ of estimated actual property value) Total Ixmded debt Less txmds m>t rep;iid solely from tax levies G.O. Improvement Bonds G.O. Revenue Bonds Public Facilities Revenue Bonds Total amount of debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin $ 8.195.000 2.410.000 1.950.(K)0 3.835.(R)0 8’lV5.(KK) $ ^618,91JJ(|) $ 13.178234 $ 13.178.234 -119- CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Ratio of Net General Bonded EXbt to Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Debt Fiscal Year Bipulation (2) Assessed \'aluc (in 1,000s) Gross Bonded Debt(l) Scrxice Funds Available (1) Net Binded Debt 1986 7.172 $ 100.778 $ 1.722.088 $ 1.354.M2 $367.446 1987 7.212 103.552 1.504,562 1.158.862 345.7(H) 1988 7.284 107.415 1.350.789 1.035.242 315.547 1989 7.379 14.352 (4)1.207.220 867.436 339.784 199<7.213(5)12,892 1,010.710 694.251 316.459 1991 7,303 14.379 4.811.055 928.917 3.882.138 1992 7,303 13.165 5.561.340 1.253.423 4.307,917 1993 7.330 11.739 5.734.084 1.518.649 4.215,435 1994 7.380 12.911 5.362.830 1.349.726 4.013.104 (1)Includes Kinds rcairdcd in the General Umg-Tcmi EXbt Account Group. Prior to 1986. the General Uing-Tcrm Debt Account Group did not include any uix supported bonded debt. In 1986, the Special Assessment Fund Type was eliminated and such bonds were reairded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. Gross Kmded debt has been reduced by Debt Service deferred special assessments receivable in order to reflect only tax suppoiled debt burden. Debt Scn ice Funds available include amounts in Debt Serx ice Funds established in 1986 to sers ice general obligation debt previously recorded in Spe-cial Assessment Funds. For purposes of this analysis. EXbt Serviee Funds available do not include individual fund balance amounts in excess of the related individiuil Kmd issue amount included in gross bonded debt. (2)Population from Metropolium Council estimate as of April 1. annually. (3)Rating history from Muidy Investors Serx ice. (4)Beginning with fiscal year 1989. the terminology for Assessed X'aluations is no longer used. Tax Capacity replaces Assessed Valuations and is determined in the same manner except using smaller percentages for each property class. (5)Federal census. (6)Tlie rating for the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Binds issued by the City of Orono’s Housing and Redevelopment Authority is At. as the City is making lease-purchase payments cqu.il to the annual debt serx ice requirement. Wliile the intent is to continue the annual jxiyments and budget annual appriipriations. the City may termin.ite the lease as provided in the lease-purchase contract. • I: W. -120- f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ratio ot Net Tax Supported Bonded Debt to Assessed Value Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Tables Bi>nded Debt Rating (3) 0.36 %$ 51.23 A:i 0.33 47.93 Aa 0.29 43.32 Aa 2.37 (4)46.05 Aal 2.45 43.87 Aal 27.00 531.58 All 32.72 589.88 Aal (6) 35.91 575.09 All (6) 31.08 543.78 Aal (6) -121- Fiscal Year Trf . J 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CnY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Ratio of Annual Debt Sen ice Expenditures tor General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures (1 ) Principal $ 35.000 520.000 485,000 360.000 325.000 300.000 300.000 155.000 150,000 550,000 Interest and Other $ 7.241 224,693 197.184 174,876 150,520 126.393 106.266 248.209 412.254 388.991 Total Cfcbt Service $42.241 744,693 682.184 534.876 475,520 426,393 406,266 403.209 562.254 938.991 Total General Expenditures $ i,894.::o8 3,021.848 3,014,963 2.936.983 3,262.134 3.415.136 3.297.372 3.392,972 3.584.063 4.136,247 (1)Includes General. Special Revenue, and EXht Service Funds. Tiihle 9 Ratio of Debt Service to Total General Expenditures T T rj /C 24.6 22.6 18.2 14.6 12.5 12.3 11.9 15.7 22.7 (2)Beginning in 1986. expenditures previously rea^rded in Special Assessment Funds became a component of Debt Sen-ice Fund expenditures in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards B«.'iard Statement No. 6. J A. I i I \ I I . » u J I I I I I crry of orono, Minnesota Cbmputatiim of Direct and Ov erlapping Debt December 1,1994 Table 10 I I I I I I I 1 Governmental Unit Gross Debt (1) Sinking Funds Net Debt Net Debt /Xpplicablc to Oono Percent Amount 1 Direct debt City of Orono $ 5362,8.10 $1..149,726 $4.01.1, KM 100.000 7c $ 4,01.1, KM 1 Ovo-laf^ing debt School districts No. 278 (Orono)6,295,000 547,255 5.747.745 20.107 1,155,720■No. 276 (Minnetonka)19,755.000 601,702 19.15.1.298 0.165 .11,6.1.1■No. 277 (Westonka)14,700,000 75.1,878 1.1.946,122 6.908 96.1396 No. 284 (Wayzata)86..184.624 40,009.204 46375,420 2.165 1.00.1.910 1 Hemnepin County 67,780,000 5,712376 62,067,624 1.457 904.512 ■Metro council 87,860,000 41,6.18,716 46,221,284 0.688 117,970 1 Metro transit 1,400.000 59.1.000 807.000 0.756 6.097 1 Suburban Hennepin parks 16.875,000 1.459316 15,415,684 2.024 112,056f Total overlapping debt .101,049.624 91315.447 209.7.14.177 4,695.294 1 Total direct and overlapping debt $ .106,412.4.*t4 $ 92.665,17.1 S 21.1,747.281 $ 8,708,198 (I)(jTi)Ss bonded debt used for the net debt calculation excludes revenue bonds for all governmental units except the Citv of Orono. I -123- Water Operating Fund Sewer Operating Fund Table 1 1 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Revenue Bt>nd Coverage - Enterprise Funds (?) Gross Fiscal Revenues Year (1) Oper^ding Expenses (2) Net Revenue Available for Debt Sen’ice Debt Service Requirements Prmcyal Interest Total Q>veragc 1989 $ 189.086 $ 159.586 $29..500 $$ 17.917 $17.917 1.65 1990 265.068 16.3.271 101.797 —74.97S 74.975 1..36 1991 234.843 162.010 72.833 -74.493 74.493 0.98 1992 221.691 171..373 50.318 —74.495 74.495 0.68 1993 165.378 150.154 15.224 88.5.30 69.931 158.461 0.10 1994 243.422 169.023 74.399 88.533 64.472 15.3.005 0.49 1989 489.658 299.797 189.861 17.499 17.499 10.85 1990 583.998 .305.980 278.018 -72.188 72.188 .3.85 1991 61.3.009 .34.3.2.30 269.779 —72.755 72.755 .3.71 1992 .543.887 445.562 98..325 -72.756 72.7.56 1..35 1993 557.999 .509.286 48.713 86,470 68.324 1.54.794 0.31 1994 708.0.30 512.043 195.987 86.467 62.944 149.411 1.31 (1)TiUal revenues, including interest. (2)Total operating expenses, net of depreciation. (3)Revenue K'nds did not exist prior to 1989. .^4. i. C-. ( I Fiscal Year 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Source: OIYOF ORONO. MINNESOTA IPopulation(l) 7,020 7.172 7.212 7,284 7,379 7.213 (5) 7.303 7,365 7,330 7.3K0 Demographic Statistks Per Capita Inoxne(2) $ 18.217 18,990 20,0% 21,239 22.584 23.705 24.200 * 24,9(X) • 25.500 29.100 Sdxx4 Enrollment 1.978 2.001 1,997 2.037 2,101 2.175 2,289 2.280 2.275 2.433 Table 12 Unemployment Rate (4) (1)Metro Council (2)Federal Census Bureau data; Hennepin County average (3)Minnesota Deptinmcnt of Education, as i cpi^rtcd by Orono Schtx4 District No. 278 (4)Minnesota EX-partment of Economic Security; Hennepin County average (5)Federal Census Estimate -125- 4.1 7€ 3.9 4.1 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 3.2 Fbcal Ycm 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 191»3 1994 Caanercull Canstnictki) (I) Nuraher of IVriniu 28 23 26 18 7 VahK S 243.593 80.050 2.555.700 3.920,090 162,700 1.537.750 489.050 .522.200 12..50O 52.‘»0" CnYOFaRONO. MINM50TA Property Value. Onstructicn. ahJ Bank Depi«iU ResMJentijJ Ccnstroction(l> Number of IPennits 314 343 343 •\30 .360 333 233 272 3(1(1 308 Value 14.065.465 19.824.845 15.8.36.267 17.416J!8S 14.283.828 6.641..3‘W 14.242.621 20.916.2‘8t 16.48<).72I EsUinakJ Market V'aluc (2) industrial/ Cununercial Residential 14.7.33.500 15.652.600 16.208.f<U0 16.7.34.000 18..3(t4.1(i() :i.7‘'8.2O0 22.4f<((..3()n 21.6V).20o 2l.2''0.5oo .371.168..300 387J43.800 39.3.876.700 441.27(J.880 48(..776.00C 552.t8X..20" 582.33.\1(KI .5‘>*».'M2..3(Ht (>08.557.500 Nin-TaxaNe S 15.583.160 S 14.46.3.KM S .368.666,200 S 22..325.4.30 20.939.()70 20.939.67(1 TaNe 13 Rank Dtp<»lts (.3) i 18,521.9.3.3 2*..”>31.1.71 25.21.5.(8>5 25.35.t,o(in 23.693.000 29.031.')45 .30."’‘X..880 .3.3.(.24.0(l() .3.3..389.()()(1 .31.92.3.000 (1)City Inspictmi IXpartmcni. (2)Hennepin Ceiunty Assessing: IXpannieni; Kesulinti.il includes larms; Nm-laxable is valued by the C'ounty nice every six years. (.3) As rvptTted to('(Tiimereijl West by I'lrst Hank ol the i.akes. -126 i Tabic 14 I cmr OF ORONO, Minnesota Taxpayer Principal Taxpayers Typeof BusirKss Assessed 1994 Pav^le 1995 Tax Capacity Percent of Total Tax Capacit Washington Scientific Wtmufactunng $ 125.655 0.97 Wayzata Qsmir) Qub Prix'atc Club 104.752 0.81 Private Residence Single Family Residince 94.000 0.73 Private Residence Single Family Residence 81.602 0.63 Van Dele, Inc.Manuf.icturing 69,073 0.53 Private Resiefcnee Single Family Residence 66,668 0.52 Prixiite Residence Single Family Residence 50.179 0.39 Private Residence Single Family ResiderKC 49,IK)3 0.38 WoixJhill Counffy Club Private Club 44.629 0.35 Super Valu Gnvery Store 33,953 0.26 5 7jy^51-»5.57 n Note: Beginning with uixcs piiyahlc in 1989. the terminoU>gy for Assessed Valuations and Mill Rues is no longer used. Tax Capacity replaces Assessed X’aliutions and is determined in the vime manner except using smaller psreenUiges for eaeh pri'perty class. Tax Extension Rites are determined in a similar manner to Mill Rates in that the tax levy is divided by the Tax Capacity. -127- *» atfiB Date of Inooiporation Form of government Area Miles of streets City Private State and Countv Number of street lights Fire proteaion Number of cities providing contraCTcd fire coverage Police protection Number of stations Number of police oftkers Full-time Part-time Number of cities served Education Attendiince centers Number of students Water and sewer operations Number of connections Water Sever Recreation and culture Number i^f fvirks Tabic 15 CTTT OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Number of swimming beach Employees Classified service/full-time Part-ti me/seasi>nal Miscellaneous Statistics DecemKT 31,1994 December 17.1954: effective January 1.1955 Optional Plan "A"; Qvuncil —Administrator 24.5 square miles; 50'7f is open water or marshland 45.83 15.42 29.28 120 1 16 4 4 4 2.433 8(K) 1.770 12 with 65.20 total acres 3 with 1.40 total acres 42 19 -128 I I I I Tabic 16 CTIY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Tax Capacity, Tax Levies, r’nd Tax Extension Rites Collectible in 1995 1994 1993 Tax capacity Real property $ 12.780,145 S 12,007,816 $11.572.538 Personal fxoperty 194.020 183,655 182,211 Fiscal disparities attribution (319,388)(329,096)(365.146) Fiscal disparities distribution 256.791 306,524 349,345 Total tax capacity $ 12,911.568 $12.168.899 $11,738.948 Tax levies by County Auditor General Fund S 1,918,645 $1,893.492 $1.800.235 Debt Service Funds 1985 Improvement Bonds 50,(K)0 50.0(K)50,000 1980 Improvement Rtds ——16.100 1982 Improvement Bonds 5,500 5.5(K)5,5(M) 1991 Public Facilities Bvtds 250.000 247.620 249,000 1992 Improvement Bonds 18.(K)0 16.5(H)— 1989 Revenue Bonds 80,(KK)68.458 ToUil tax levies S 2.322.145 $2.281.570 $2,120.835_ Tax extension rates by County Auditor(l) General Fund 12.753 7c 13.428 7c 13.261 ' Debt Service Funds 1985 Improvement Bttds 0.333 0.354 0.369 1980 Improvement Bonds ——0.119 1982 Improvement Bonds U.043 0.039 0.040 1991 Public Facilities Bonds 1.717 1.751 1.8.35 1^92 Improvem mt Bitds 0.139 0.117 — 19S9 Revenue Bonds 0.619 0.563 — Total tax extension rates 15.604 7c 16.252 7(15.624 7f (1)Tax levies include the suite piid Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA). -129- i j THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK i... •InctepMKiMit AudRor’t Report on IntfnalControl SInicturo iiMt Qthtr Woquirtdfteports I___i-.... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRINCIPALS KENNt IM W MAUOV. CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A KAHNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A HAOOStVICH CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT ON THE INTERNAL CONT ROL STRUCTl?RE BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE nNANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1W4. and have issued our report thereon dated May 17. 1995. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditini! Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono for the year ended December 31. 1994. we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpo.se of expressing our iTpinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to prtwide assurance on the internal ci^ntrol structure. The management of the City of Orono is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, e.stimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal cimtrol structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control .structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute. a.s.surance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or dispositiim. and that transacti»'ns are executed in accordance w ith management’s authorization and recorded properly ti' permit the preparation of general purpose financial statements in accordance with generally accepted acc»>unting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control .structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future peritnls is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and prtKedures may deteriorate. (continued) cewTiriKo lO AOCOiJfMT AfMTS 4Ul PAMK NANOfaAl (4ANK HUKDtNKj I SVAy /.AIA (♦< >tn I VAHO MINNI AIH n i:> MINNI fiOTA V»4U, OV t>4fi (>4:'4 Hi I ♦ AK »|1.' S4‘. tJMm -130- 'T'r I For the purpose of this repon, we have classified Uk significant internal control structure policies and procedures in the following categories; cash receipts/revenue, cash disbursements/expenditures, payroll, and external financial reporting. For all of the internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and prcxredures and whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk. Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely periixl by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. In our management report to the City Council, issued in connection with our audit of the City ’s general purpose financial statements, we have separately communicated our observations and recommendations regarding other matters. This report is intended for the information of the City Ct'uncil and management of the City of Orono. However, this report is a maner of public record and its distribution is not limited. ^. May 17, 1995 I -131- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ♦ i I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRINCIF^S KFNNETH W MALLOV CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE. CPA THOMAS A AAHNOWSKI CPA RAUl A RADOSEVICH CRA EPENDENT AUDITOR’S COMPLIANCE REPORT BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL Pl'RPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT ALDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Oono Orono. Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31. 1W4. and have issued our report thereon dated May 17. 1995. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. Compliance with laws and regulatii>ns applicable to the City of Orono is the responsibility ot the City’s management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, 've perfi*rmed tests of the City’s compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, and contracts. However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with .such provisions. Accordingly, we do not express such .in opinion. The results of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the City of Onmo complied, in all material respects, with the provisions referred ti' in the preceding paragraph With respect to items not te.sted. nothing came to our attention that cau.sed us to believe that tlie City had not complied, in all material respects, with those provisions. This report is intended for the information of the City Council and management of the City of Orono. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. May 17. 1995 ACCOtJMTA»MT» 4toPAH»s raAtitjfiAi BANK Him(nra<i S Ab I iM K.JI i VAMO MlN»4f Al*t>l r, MlNNl StjTA UlHH40Nt bt"‘>4S(M?4 Till » A* S4S ITbTW -132- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK L k .1 ITMi.lk•<!• fcmm TH M MMii.'Hr L fMn<jnMkSM c^tHOMMS A •uMWH.'JWSHt CFA fWAA. A «MXiaiVH.>* t ] L. l^pPPFXDFNT AI DITQP S REPORT ON COMPLlA&i££ WITH minvf5;ota state laws and REGVL^TIQ^S City CtHtficil and Residrnts Cit>' ot Orono Orono, MinncM^ia Wc have audited the general purpitse financial staieinents ot *' ^ the year ended December 31, 1994. and have issued our repiirt thereon dated May 17. IW We conducted cnir audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and rhe Minnfcota I ^^>^1 rompliance Audit Guide tor b>cal Govcnumi promulgated b> the Legal Com^^^ia^ellsk^F^rceU^ua^^^^ MinneMHa Statutes § 6 65 Acuird.ngly, the audit incluJalvuchtes^ STe ^counting rec.^ds and such enher auditing pr.^edures as considered necessars in the circumstances Th*. Minnesota Lecal r..,T,ni...me Audit Guide for I .K:al Governmenj covers five main compliance to be testd cimu^tinMnd lidding, deposits and investrnents. ttmllicts ot interest, pu ic indebtedness, and claims and disbursements Our study included all ot the listed categories The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested the City of Orono complied with the matenal ,crm, and .ond.uom ot arpHcahk legal r-ovis.»ns, Fonhet. for the nems n.« f ■ '’“f "" and the procedures referred to above, nothing c^me to our attenti.m to indicate that the > complied with such legal provisions. This report is intended for the intormat.on of the City Council and management of the City of Orono. However. thi.s report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Mav 17. 1995 c;«. M ririKO A o o o*sl T A »ha T » 4Yi)»>aH*«BAN*» MUliinNi ) WAf ,’AfA H< n.it FVAMl; MINN> AW-M ts MtNM St.’fA SS414, •I *>4‘> l»4i'4 f» 1 1 fA« f.1? S4S -133- ♦ THIS PAGE LEfT INTENTIONALLV BLANK A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE:July 7, 1995 rrEM NO.: j Department Approval: Name Ronald A. Moorse Title City Adnunistrator Administrator Reviex^ed:Agenda Section: Citv Administrator’s Report Item Descriptioin Scheduling a Work Session to Review the Preliminary 1996 Budget Overview The 1996 budget development schedule includes two budget work sessions. The first, to be scheduled the week of July 24, is to review the preliminary budget overview. The Council may at this time want to schedule the first budget work session. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to set the time and date for the first 1996 Eudgt i Work Session. r?UNCILMEEI1N6 JUL 1 0 1995 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: July 7, 1994 ITEM NO,'■/V Department Approval: Name Ronald A. Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ^7 Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Resolution Proclaiming August 1, 1995 as National Night Out The North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition is coordinating a community "Night Out" event to be held on Tuesday. August 1. 1995. The event will be an ice cream social in the parking lot of Rick’s Super Valu in Navarre. In recognition of this event as pan of the "National Night Out", the Crime Prevention Coalition has requested the City adopt the attached resolution proclaiming Tuesday, August 1, 1995 as "National Night Out" in Orono. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTSTEn* Motion to adopt a resolution proclav- Tuesday, August 1, 1995 as "National Night Out in the City of Orono. r - A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 1995 WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 1, 1995 called "National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the "12th Annual National Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for the City of Orono to join forces with thousar.ds of other communities across the country m promoting cooperative, police/community crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, the Nonh Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition plays a vital role in assisting the Orono Police Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts m the City of Orono, and is supporting "National Night Out 1995" locally; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Orono be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and the impact their panicipaiion can have on reducing crime, drugs, and violence in Orono; and WHEREAS, police/community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out program, NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby call upon all ciiizen^ of Orono to join the North Tonka Prevention CoaliM^ the N^onal Association of Town Watch in supporting 12th Annual National Night Out August 1,«1995. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, the Orono City Council does hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 1. 1995 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in the City of Orono, Minnesota. Ari'EST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 1 of 1 r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE tw^.kLiiL j JUL 1 0 1995 #k ^ y ^ ITEM NO.:/ / Department Approval: Name John Gerbardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed: /4 Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Resignation for Retirement - Wayne Quast, Public Works Supervisor On July 5, 1995, Public Works Supervisor Wayne Quast submitted his resignation to be effective July 28, 1995. Wayne will be retiring after fourteen years of employment with the City of Orono and a total of twenty-four years of municipal service. Wayne has been a valued employee and will be greatly missed. As set out in the City’s Personnel Policy, an employee leaving in good standing receives a payout of one-third of total accumulated sick leave, with a maximum of 960 hours of accumulation, and all vacation time not exceeding 240 hours. Wayne will receive: 320 hours sick leave @ $17,549 = $5,615.68 172.04 hours vacation @ $17,549 = $3.019.13 $8,634.81 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To accept Wayne Quast ’s resignation effective July 28, 1995 and to approve the preliminary severance amount of $8,634.81. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETir.'G JUL 1 0 1995 CitYOfORONO DATE: July 5, 1995 ITEM NO.; / Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section: Public Works \ Item Description: Temporary Employment Orono Golf Course Due to the resignation of a counter helper at the Orono Golf Course, it is necessary to fill that position. Therefore it is recommended to employ Nathan Walker as a temporary counter helper at the Orono Golf Course effective June 30. 1995 at an hourly rate of $6.00 per hour. The above position is for a six month period from actual start date which is June 30, 1995. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To employ Nathan Walker as a temporary counter helper at the Orono Golf Course effective June 30, 1995 at an hourly rate of $6.00. r lt rso ( at ease o e •·• I e .• ) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING .oL 3 0 1995 CfTY Of ORONO DATE: June 8, 1995 ITEM NO: ^ 6 Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk [tern Description: Licenses Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licemra Special Events Permit Long Lake Com Days Foot Race Uackberry' Park on Willow Drive South to Brown Road North to Orchard on Brow’n Road West to Holbrook Park COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses COUNCIL MEETING1 0 1995 CITY Of DHOfilQ r u7/02/iS PiCB PRREGOR 255 EMP #NA.ME 4722C4554 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 468113870 468843C03 472503991 469S26G26 475939721 468821018 468622840 472529007 468701868 4696Sb562 468420832 474667012 475380151 477500666 47544424? 477463877 471569863 473141624 477647279 471048180 472500574 121262417 475344512 480043542 477561040 470987727 477700023 334506281 477028779 473108428 460909535 476787251 476066274 470700901 469040107 471487919 474167795 475382983 473746173 473609629 468320409 70566529 69629194 75569177 67460042 67460042 67460042 72563051 74663296 70704904 75505292 68629488 77801539 HASEMAN, JOHNSCN, JOSTROM, KARNIT2, ALCH,JERCX^TH S. ANDERSON,BRUCE L BGB2IEN,SUE A BORIS,SCOTT W BCSMA,JAMIE L. BRINKHAUS,JOHN F CALLAGHAN,JEREMIAH CARLSCN,MICHAEL B CKESWICK,GAR/ B CCRNICK,JA.MES L DEMBOUSKI,JAY C ENGLISH III,IRVING ERICKSON,DOUGLAS J ERICKSON,KURT R FISCHENICH,DAN T GAFFRCN,MICHAEL P GERKARDSCN,JOHN R GREGORY,JAMES D HALLIN,DOROTHY M HANSEN,STEVEN C HAIISING,CAROL J CAROLE BRADLEY P FOREST J RICKY D hONOLLENBERG,KRISTIN KUEHN,THOMAS M MABUSTH,JEAI^NE A MCINTYRE,WILLIAM E MCNICHOLS,DAVID L MELTCN,NEIL W. MILLER,CHRISTOPHER MOORSE,RONALD J MCROWC2YNSKI,JAMES NELSON,DAVID D. OAS.DANIEL O CBERAIGNER,SCOTT G OBRIEN,rai;dy L OLSON,JOHN C. OMAN,LYLE E PALMER,GREGORY A PERSELL,WILLIAM R. PETERSON,JACK W QUASI,WAYNE A RATHBUN,BARRY J ROSS,JOHN A RUTHER,ALVIN C. SCHOENHOFF,JOHN B SKREEN,DALE S STEFFENHAGEN,RONALD SULLIVAI4,STEPHEN X SULLIVAT4,STEPHEN X SULLIVAN,STEPHEN X THCMTON,MARK R TOMCHECK,LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK,MARK W VANG,BRUCE L VEE,LINDA S WECKMAN,STEPHEN J DPT 93 31 31 31 12 42 35 31 31 31 31 31 93 31 31 33 12 42 12 42 31 12 31 93 31 31 15 33 93 31 31 15 12 31 35 93 42 92 15 33 42 31 93 92 92 93 93 31 42 93 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 12 33 YTD GROSS 353.40 26797.47 15097.67 17323 0396 23184 1687 5120 24843 25747 25864 24442 299 22611 22801 21735 32330 18541 18724 17400 8678 14951 23834 038 2115 54 98 31977 27220 1759 23445 1826 16003 35692 24041 273 1667 17672 17782. 13644, 21735, 17342 5095 . CCKREN- okCS. 2453 20615 17267 .89 .49 .00 .64 . 76 . 84 .05 .75 . 94 .00 . 64 .35 .69 .78 .28 .19 ,55 64 42 ,72 10 13 36 48 95 60 48 23 33 15 S3 32 80 27 22 36 67 33 13 8 5 77 53 713.40 359.10 17292.66 17509.15 18724.16 62692.69 62692.69 62692.69 22600.57 23673.46 22561.27 18322.15 15400.00 17361.48 114 2040 1071 1204 534 1656 528 , 448 1774 . 2183 . 1962 . 1833 . 59 . 1611 . 2058 . 1555. 2357. 1163 . 1340. 1315 . 574 . 964 . 1747 . 182 . 224 . 422 . 2288 . 1948 . 249 . 1972 . 465 . 1190. 2 6 4 9. 1807 . 112 . 316 . 1143 . 1540 . 1017 . 1555 . 1143 . 527. 313 . 1430. 1143 . 150. 68 . 1758 . 1143 . 1340. 2177. 34308. 1759. 1818 . 1611 . 1340 . 1071. .0 .1 . .2. .8^ .7 .0 .3- .8‘ .5. .8^ .3 .3 .5 .5. .9' .5: .72 .04 .01 2f 8( OP AS IC 42 5f 4^oe 4C 02 67 32 44 92 54 20 66 39 69 52 67 39 50 24 68eo 40 39 68 00 28 05 27 56 52 00 20 1242.48 103,604.28 07/31/95 PR: CM P.RREGCR -56 EMP #NAME DPT YTD GROSS CURRENT GROSS 469188026 CALLAHAN,EDWARD J 11 2100.00 300.OC 18324677 GOETTEN, J.DIANN 11 1691.69 241.67 470366069 HURR,JOELLEN L 11 1691.69 241.67 473646272 JABBOUR,GABRIEL 11 1691.69 241.67 476527186 KELLEY, CHARLES 11 1691.69 241.67 1,266.68 li COOKCIL CHECK KEoifftK ThQ Jul 4 1995 03tl3i41 •CHECK MO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUHT VKMDOE DESCRIPTIOII hccamn •INVOICE0334SI$45.00$45.00*A 4 T UOHOLMtKKY CO REPAIR SEAT 1149 0139-4341 Oh 033459 lflS/07/101995/07/101995/07/10 $30.44$29.07$29.00 $04.59* A T 4 TA T 4 TA T 4 T DISTANCE CHARGECELL PHONE UTILITIESCELL FHOKE-UTILITIBS 0129-422C0549-432005494320 •02931•02940•02940 OHOHOH 033440 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $1,070.10 $94,044.07 $95,124.97* AMERICAN NATL EANK AMERICAN NATL BANK HRA TRUST PEE TO 4/1 HRA C«BT DUE 7/15/95 0911-4430 0911-4430 002971 002971 OH OH 033441 1995/07/10 $403.00 $403.00* A^IDATA HAIMT CONTRACT 0129-4 MO 9775 OH 033442 1995/07/10 $320.43 $320.42* APACHB PAPER CO tonbls. tissue 0099-4211 134439 OH 033443 1995/07/10 $42.53 $42.53* AT & T HIRBLRB SERVICE CELL PRONE-GERHARDSO 0099 4320 002939 OH 033464 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $44.05 $5.30 $10.00 $18.92 $78.27* AT4T INFO SYSTEM AT4T INFO SYSTEM AT4T INFO SYSTEM AT4T INFO SYSTEM MAINT-POLICE PHONE LONG DISTANCE LONG distance long distance 0129-4340 0139-4320 0099-4320 0099-4320 0029 U 002947 002950 002949 OH OH OH OH 033445 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $48.18 $54.84 $103.02* AUOies MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF SAmiNICHES FOR RBSAL HOT DOGS, BURGERS 0591-4802 0591-4802 2S416 002934 OH OH 033444 1995/07/10 $4 .43 $4.43* BIG A AUTO PARTS TIE STRAPS 0590-4232 5120 OH 033467 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $104.72 $7.47 $112.39* BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING DARE ANNOUNCEMENTS MARKINGS FOR SEAL CO 0840-4243 0249-4233 9540 10081 OH OH 033468 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $52.00 $36.40 $88.40* CHUNKS GARAGE CHtJNKS GARAGE CLEAN RADIATOR #170 INSTALL BARRIER 0129-4341 0129-4341 4138 4344 OH OH 033469 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $6.90 $7.39 $15.99 $ .29 $14.84 $.32 $45.73* CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO CITY OP ORONO CITY OF ORONO CITY OP ORONO POSTAGE FOR CAPR MAI MISC KITCHEN SUPPLIE SIGN BOARD ADU'L POSTAGE MISC KITCHEN SUPPLIE ADD'L POSTAGE 0099-4321 0099-4210 0099-4210 0099-4321 0099-4210 0099-4321 002945 00294S 002945 002945 002945 00294S OH OH OH OH OH OH IL CHBCK txcisrn Thu « 1»9S 02 ill: 41CfUaC NO CHECK DATSlMl/07/10 mxan ^ it N OESClXmONVOf rot UCSALI ACCWST ••Sfl-4002 IHVOICl044S4934 K>turn 0«9« 2MJW<llAl4OH033470 033471 03'‘47J 033473 033474 03347& 033474 033477 03347a lf*5/67/li 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/J7/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1441.27$441.27*OOCK COLA VEHDmO $24 $2 $2 $21 $12 $74 $111 $2 $ 25 SO 07 47 75 74 22 55 •5 COMWfKCIAL CCfOCEiCIAL COMVRCIAL CCMmiCIAL COMHCltCIAL CCWHEKCIAL COWtERCIAL COMNERCIAL coto qmciAL Liri/G«p Lin/GKO LiPK/air Lira/GRO LlfE/GRP L1PI/GR9 Lin/GRP Lin/GRP Lirs/GRP JITNB JUNE JUNE JUNE JUNE sum JUNE JUNE JUKI LIPI INS Lira IMS Lira IRS Lira INS Lira INS Lira INS Lira IMS Lira INS Lira IMS 0039 0549 0549 04 9 »l '4 0129 9999 004 9 0590 $254.70* 1154.19 $154.19* $5,422 92 $5,422.92* $44.44 $44.44* $53 .04 $444.00 $517.04* $28.17 $24.17* $1,524.15 $1,442.92 $144.51 $148.00 $3,745.58* $80.00 $130.00 $80.00 $110.00 $400.00* 4152 4152 4^52 4152 4152 I.S2 2030 ti52 4152 rELLT INDUSTRIAL IL RKPAIR SOTIVrER 81 $49 $2 $49 $15 $48 $2 $44 $15 09 40 02 49 05 40 99 49 1-1 MCYCLlllG I.H. tENNER 4 ROMS EARL P AMDBRSOH ASSC EARL P AMDBRSOM ASSC ENGLISH IRVING ESS EROTHERS 4 SONS ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS FROST,SHERRY R. FROST,SHERRY R. FROST,SHERRY R. FROST,SHERRY R. G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES JUNl SERVICES 5/8* PACKING BOLTS PC« SWINGS HARDWARE FOR SWINGS HEALS RBIMB-JUDO SCH ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUSTMENT RINGS VALVE ADJUSTMENT RIN BORING MILL CHARGES PARK MlNirrES COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL MINUTES PLANNING COMM MINUTE STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN FLOOR MATS RATHBUN, QUAST STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES RATHBUN, QUAST 0549-4 J45 0295-4392 0*>49 4 345 0395-4520 0290-4232 0129-4354 0549-4344 0549-4344 0549-4344 0549-4344 0590-4304 C039-4304 0039-4306 0174-4306 0249 0590 0099 0549 024 J 0590 0249 0549 4221 4221 4343 4221 4221 4221 4221 4221 002941 002941 CC2941 002941 002941 70294X 002941 002941 002941 3457 002944 01782 141944 142154 002940 001451 001440 001483 001473 002955 002955 002955 002955 535259 535257 535258 535240 527692 631490 531-.91 002937 OH OH! OH OHI OH OH OH OH OH OH OH oH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OHort OH . ^1 •.ECK REGISTER Thu Jul 6CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 02:13:41VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT U INVOICE PO NUM.pPage 3#MANUAL1995/07/10 $2.60 G k K SERVICES STEFFENHAGEN 0590-4221 527691 OH 1995/07/10 $15.49 $305.42* G It K SERVICES RATHBUN, QUAST 0549-4221 527693 OH 1995/07/10 $1,000.00 $1,000.00* GOLF CAR MIDWEST CART RENTAL-JULY 0590-4331 002962 OH 1995/07/10 $686.61 $606.61* .JU4EL BUILDING CENTER PARK SIGNS 9112-4330 7135 OH 1995/07/10 $73.00 $73.00* HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM k BOARD MAY 0080-4358 458 OH 1995/07/10 $184.54 $164.54* HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT MAY BOOKING FEES 0080-4358 002957 OH 1995/07/10 $91.80 $91.80* HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL TRENCHER RENTAL 0395-4511 002929 OH 1995/07/10 $26.02 $26.02* IMS/MN METER TAPE 0099-4321 22654 OH 1995/07/10 $600.00 $600.00* INFRATECH TELEVISION SEWER MAI 0569-4344 95294 OH 1995/0'»/10 $190.11 JIM HATCH SALES CO STROBE LIGHT 0249-4232 5715 OH 1995/07/10 $67.41 $257.52* JIM HATCH SALES CO ORANGE VEbTS 0249-4221 5715 OH 1995/07/10 $26.56 KUEHN, THOMAS JUNE MILEAGE 0569-4381 002967 OH 1995/07/10 $46.49 $73.05* KUEHl^ THOMAS JUNE MILEAGE 0069-4381 002967 OH 1995/07/10 $12,548.00 $12,548.00* LAKEMTKA CONS DIST 1ST HAI’1995 LMCD 0020-4380 002972 OH 1995/07/10 $44.60 $44.60* LAKEVILLE PRODUCTS CANDY FOR RESALE 0591-4802 002933 OH 1995/07/10 $30.00 $20.00* LEAGUE OF MN CITIES SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 0039-4240 1967 OH 1995/07/10 $30.50 $30.50* LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPM REPLACE SAW BUSHINGS 0249-4232 8789 OH 1995/07/10 $20.41 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR HOSE FITTINGS 0590-4232 204327 OH 1995/07/10 $29.82 $50.23* LONG LK FORD TRACTOR PARTS FOR HYDRANTS 0549-4234 203581 OH 1995/07/10 $2,318.00 MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #2 0369-4300 23796 OH 033479 033480 033481 033482 033483 033484 033485 033486 033487 033488 033489 033490 033491 033492 033493 CdOHClL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jul 6 1995 02:13:41CHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM.Page 4MANUAL m 1995/07/10 $2,019.00 MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #2 0549-4300 237961995/07/10 $1,648.00 MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #2 0590-4300 237960334941995/07/10 $3,686.00$9,671.30*MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #2 0020-4300 237961995/07/10 $675.33 MEDINA CHOICE JULY INS 0069-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $1,163.50 MF'^CA CHOICE JULY INS 0039-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $2,668.55 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0129-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $2,368.64 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 9999-2030 195182102552 1995/07/10 $488.17 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0174-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $1,204.04 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0249-4151 195102102552 1995/07/10 $262.79 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0549-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $412.54 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 05G9-4151 195182102552 1995/07/10 $1,272.42 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 9001-1298 195182102552 1995/07/10 -$78.57 MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0549-4151 195182102552 033495 1995/07/10 -$183.32 $10,254.09* MEDICA CHOICE JULY INS 0569-4151 195102102552 033496 1995/07/10 $4,079.91 $4,079.91* MICRO AGE GENICOM PRINTER 0629-4540 91259 1995/07/10 $71.25 MIDWEST ASPHALT HAND PATCH 0249-4233 60211MB 1995/07/10 $308.50 MIDWEST ASPHALT HAND PATCH 0249-4233 60155MU 033497 1995/07/10 $498.00 $877.75* MIDWEST ASPHALT HAND PATCH 0249-4233 60105MB 1995/07/10 $237.92 MIDWEST BSN;; PROD MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4210 250330 03349a 1995/07/10 $9.66 $247.58* MIDWEST BSNS PROD CALENDAR-URINKHAUS 0099-4210 247244 033499 1995/07/10 $195.00 $195.00* MILE SCHOEimOFF-MlLE CONF 0129-4356 002966 033500 1995/07/10 $56.26 $56.26* MILLER,CHRIS JUNE MILEAGE 0069-4301 002969 033501 1995/07/10 $64.00 $64.00* MINN CITY M'lMNT ASSN MCCMA DUES-MOORSE 0039-4380 002930 1995/07/10 $96.11 MINNEGASCO JUNE CHARGES 0549-4324 002940 1995/07/10 $103.08 MINNEGASCO JUNE CHARGES 0099-4324 002940 1995/07/10 $11.58 MINNEGASCO JUNE CHARGES 0569-4324 002940 033502 1995/07/10 $97.15 $307.92* MINNEGASCO JUNE CHARGES 0099-4324 002940 1995/07/10 $27.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE jui;e sales tax 9001-3500 002963 1995/07/10 $2,200.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE JUNE SALES TAX 9674-2222 002963 033503 1995/07/10 $6.00 $2,233.00* MN DEPT OF REVENUE JUNE SALES TAX 9001-3527 002963 OHOHOHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH k .COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jul 6 1995 02:13:41 Pige 5CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL1995/07/10 $360.00 MN DEPT PUB SAFETY CJDN OPERATION CHARG 0329-4340 95Q2225 OH033504$360.00* 1995/07/10 $45.36 NSP NSP COSTS 0290-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $194.86 NSP NSP COSTS 0249-4324 002964 Oh 1995/07/10 $9.42 NSP NSP COSTS 0175-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $2,834.62 NSP NSP COSTS 0549-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $184.61 NSP NSP COSTS 0590-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $689.95 NS?NSP COSTS 0569-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $1,128.01 NSP NSP COSTS 0099-4324 002964 OH 1995/07/10 $562.25 NSP NSP COSTS 0129-4324 002964 OH 033505 $5,649.09* 1935/07/10 $380.00 OFFICE PROD OF MN TYPEWRITER MAINT COf?0099-4340 261773 OH 03350O $380.00* 1995/07/10 $11.55 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.CHIPS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 772002 OH 1995/07/10 $13.86 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.POTATO CHIPS 0591-4802 772179 OH 033507 $25.41* 1995/07/10 $14.07 OLSON, JOHN C.JUNE MILEAGE 0069-4381 002970 OH 033508 $14.07* 1995/07/10 $51.33 OMAN/LYLE JUNE MILEAGE REIMB 03 74 -4381 002959 OH 033509 $51 .-»3* 1995/07/10 $69.12 OTTEN BROS LAWN EHGING 0395-4511 018595 OH1995/07/10 $20.12 OTTEN BROS FLOWERS 0590-4343 019948 OH19° /07/10 $58.58 OTTEN BROS WOOD CHIPS 0395-4511 002936 CH1995/07/10 $70.29 OTTEN BROS WOOD CHIPS 0395-4511 020289 OH 033510 $218.11* 1995/07/10 $15.00 PALMER, GREGG REIMB WTR OPER. LICE 0549-J3 002946 OH033511$15.00* 1995/07/10 $108.00 PERA INS AUG INSURANCE 9999-2030 002951 OH 1995/07/10 $24.00 PERA INS AUG INSURANCE 0129-4152 002951 OH 033512 $132.00* 1995/07/10 $12.00 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR WEIoDING ON MOWER DEC 0590-4342 15437 OH 1995/07/10 $219.50 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PROPERT' ROOM AUCTIO 9001-3790 15255 OH033513$231.50* 1995/07/10 $27.30 PIONEER MEETING NOTICE 0C99-4322 150 OH 1995/07/10 $80.88 PIONEER ORD #136 0C99-4322 179 OH 033514 $108.18* 1995/07/10 $42.02 PRECISION BUSINESS SYS HEADSET FOR DICTATIO 0099-4340 51882 OH 033515 $42.02* C«;NCIL check register Thu Jul 6CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 02tl3:41VENDORPRECISION TURF DESCRIPTION Page £ACCOUNT #INVOICE0590-4231 002958 OH 0129-4341 002961 OH0129-4341 5702 OH01*'9-4341 5660 OH0129-4341 5669 OH0129-4341 5692 OH0129-4341 5711 OH0129-4341 5779 OH 0129-4221 19042 OH 0591-4802 29893 OH0591-4802 15110 OH 0129-4210 3769127 OH0129-4210 3769161 OH 9001-1260 47637 OH 0299-4306 15278 OH9999-2030 15278 OH 0590-4342 2419 OH 0591-4800 15402 OH 0299-4399 002968 OH 0129-4341 28432.1 OH0129-4341 28636.1 OH 0299-4900 0952196-4 OH 0099-4210 24^^6 2 OH 0G26 -4560 39681 OH 033516 $924.68* 03351' '10 199b/0//10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $20.60 $19.53 $19.53 $36.45 $29.53 $19.53 $113.85 $259.02* 033518 1995/07/10 $3.73 $3.73* 033519 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $83.40 $110.20 $193.60* 033520 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $18.83 $7.31 $26.14* 033521 1995/07/10 $2,727.18 $2,727.18* 033522 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $126.50 $1,462.25 $1,588.75* 033523 1995/07/10 $325.61 $325.61* 033524 1995/07/10 $285.00 $285.00* 033525 1995/07/10 $350.00 $350.00* 033526 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $145.89 $3.09 $148.98* 033527 1995/07/10 $1,149.29 $1,149.29* 033526 1995/07/10 $142.88 $142.88* 1995/07/10 $451.30 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST PRO TIFE k EXHAUST pro TT; E k EXHAUST PRO TIKE I. EXHAUST PRO TIRE k EXHAUST PRO TIRE l< EXHAUST PRO TIRE k EXHAUST SEEDOIL CHANGE #167 OIL CHANGE #170 OIL CHANGE #166 OIL CHANGE, BRAKE IN OIL CHANGE #172 OIL CHANGE #173 BRAKES #172 R C INDENTIFICATIONS ID CARD-FISHER REED VENDING REED VENDING RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA ROLLINS OIL CO SAF^’ BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS SCHARBER k SONS INC SCOTT BEACK CANDY FOR RESALE CANDY FOR RESALE FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING GASOLINE PURCHASE JULY W/H JULY W/H REPAIR JOHN DEERE MO GOLF BALLS FOR RESAL STATE OF MINN CPV PROG CPV MEMBERSHIP STREICHERS STREICHERS REPLACE LIGHTS FILTER FOR LIGHT STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH HWY 12 STUDY-MAY STRINGER BtlS SYSTM FAX PAPER TELEPHONE SPECIALIST REPLACE PHONFiS d, EXT ’N COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jul 6 I995 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 02:13:41VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT K INVOICE PO NUM.Page 7 MANUAL033529$451.30* 033530 1995/07/10 $65.10 $65.10* THORPE DIST CO BEER FOR RESALE 0591-4815 60526 OH 033531 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $433.72 $530.11 $297.13 $198.09 $1,459.05* TOWN & COUNTRY TOWN fc COUNTRY TOWN k COUNTRY TOWN k COUNTRY JULY SERVICE JULY SERVICE WINDOW WASHING WINDOW WASHING (129-4349 0099-4349 009 •»-4343 0129-4343 002:56 002956 002930 002938 OH OH OH OH 033532 1995/07/10 $130.00 $130.00* U OF MINNESOTA ADVANCED ACADEMY-HAL 0039-4356 002943 OH 033533 1995/07/10 $23.66 $23.66* U S WEST CELLULAR CELL PHONE-CHESWICK 0129-4320 002942 OH 033534 1995/07/10 $27.69 $27.69* UNIVERSITY EXTENSION WORK GLOVES 0569-4221 511449 OH 033535 1995/07/10 $445.49 $445.49* US WEST CELLULAR INC CELL PHONE-CHESWICK 0129-4340 002954 OH 033536 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $55.66 $29.21 $12.52 $54.01 $375.55 $249.29 $55.29 $156.90 $908.43* US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN LS WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS DIRECTORY ADS 0099-4320 0569-4320 0549-4320 0590 4320 0099-4320 0129-4320 0590-4320 0590-4323 002965 002965 002965 002965 0(12965 0O2965 002965 0O2965 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 033537 1995/07/10 $111.48 $111.48* VESSCO INC WTR CHLORINE METER 0549-4342 8806 OH 033538 1995/07/10 $1,658.98 $1,658.90* WATERPRO 3" COMPOUND METER 9672-1273 698370 OH 033539 1995/07/10 $146.90 $146.90* WEST SIDE REDI-MIX INC CONCRETE FOR POSTS 0395-4511 46629 OH 033540 1995/07/10 $28.85 $28.85* WESTONKA CLASS SERVICE REPAIR CLUBHOUSE WIN 0590-4343 24204 OH 033541 1995/07/10 1995/07/10 $18.00 $10.00 $28.00* WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIR KESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIR REPAIR TIRE ON SWEEP PATCH TIRE ON TRUCK 0249-4342 0249-4342 01800 : A 002935 OH OH 1995/07/10 $9.00 .-RIGHT HENN ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTING 0249-4325 002952 OH COOMCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jul 6 1995 CHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995/07/10 02:13:41VENDOR Page 81995/07/10 $8.69 NRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC $17.69*$1,417.86 YOCUM OIL CO INC $1,417.86*$174,068.93 DESCRIPTION STREET LIGHTINGDIESEL FUEL ACCOUNT n PO NUM.MANUAL0249-4325 002953 OH0249-4220 147522 OH r iviffxnaMCOONCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Jul 6 1995 02:13:48 Page 1FUND•001 GENERAL FUND $46,311.28FUND»112 PARK FUi:D $1,176.34FUND»114 IMP/EQUIP 0/L FD $4,531.21FUND«350 91 PUB FAC D/S $95,124.97 FUND «S72 WTR OPERATING FD $7,213.03 FUND «673 EWR OPERATING FD $7,760.43 FUND «674 G/C OPERATING FD $7,901.56 FUND »999 PAYROLL CLEARING $4,050.11 $174,068.93 information %■ ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING GOUNGILMEEnNG JUL 1 0 1995 CnVOFORONO OF '■V Lii-f' ■ <>c r ^9' Si*. I !'• p^ •4-r >> [jyU J. 1896 W Chcei CWwu>zx, 0(^3 S', Vc/3i£^ciOLM (AtX ‘«^0ubc^lu>6cl -fKc.OuA^d ^ >tn<£. C«^(toraA Oo^ 3Ad APtca^K^U,U.Qt^f dl ^0C^-WVA dct^ S qucuL Cjola ., ft • k Stuaed +ij2.hCS. TA jl PPPo OtAt. <ail <1 die. i<-(l<j j\d 4d-<. S cV ms. biLU-iS<D iPc/t. i QXxiWQ^ 'P0i/^i6 (U\L Jio. Lid -tLe. (Sf^uyVd'OVA. (L^Cd-L^.-iC. OS5 SO 4'h/KAitf' — J^'\jX , SAA 5>0 (^V(d-i-uJt'-l-(*- -Ha .tuU -Hv/ugtL-H /Kc(.(rv«_Shj^ld lo^ an aC( pleased \ji_CijJdiDir CeaL\U G C^d Cu^rCi cil U V ve/j y^Qp^ o , Co^ Oxpa J. "-C> LnrO c^ iri<JuP I rh (5ta,(L t>y^udL (wn 6VCTUJ2) »n rf .^Tir Hr,. r ^^pAsoralM -te^v -fOvjz.. 'XV x UJlJl &D /UjLACic- ScnccAJti^, .Xuai^t'e. Keadi^tciL. fc^®Sd Uc. CevHcKj&-M TO: FROM: DATE: iNljyor and City Ccwmcil Ron Moorsc, City Adminmraiw hint 29. 1995 SinUECT:Update Rejarding Exfeieioa of Sewer to 710 Dickey Lake Drive In April of 1990, Joel Walvalnc imbued about cxiendii^ a sewer line from the sewer trunk on Highway 12 north through the Ouen [vopeity to scr\e his reskkmial property at 710 Dickey Lake Drive. The City suff and City Council determined that because his property was included in the MUSA amendment, that was part of the 1989 n^th Highway 12 comprehensive plan amendment, a sewer connection was approved. Because Ok Highw ’ay 12 sewer project had just been installed, so that the city engineer was familiar with the project and the area, it was determined in discussions with Mr. Walvalnc that the city engineer would design the Walvalnc project and Walvatne would pay all engineering and construction costs. The city then authori/ed Boneslroo to develop the plans for lia project. The plan was for a lateral to bring sewer from the Highway 12 sewer trunk line through the Otten propeity to the Walvatne property, then a private connection from the lateral across the Walvalnc property to the Walvatne home. In designing the project it was dctemiiK*d that tlie lateral slK>uld be constructed to servT boili the Walvatne property and a residential property owned by Cliff Otten. This required an extension of the lateral to the east to ser\e tlie Otten residential property. Mr. Walvatne was given the responsibility to work out a cost sliaring arrangement willi Mr. Otten for the sewer lateral. Theie was a long delay in moving ahead with the sewer project due to working out the cost sharing arrangement with Ctten, ‘.’hanging llic location of the proposed sewer line as it crossed the Otten property, and Mr. Walvatne’s objection to the necessity of including the lateral extension to serve the Otten residential parcel as part of the project. At a meeting in 1991 it was determined the lateral extension to serve the Otten property was not required to be a part of the project. The plan was then revised to rellect this. The city then required that prior to allowing construction of the project to proceed Mr. Walvatne would need to provide a letter of credit or similar security to cover the costs of the project. At that time Mr. Walvatne raised numerous questions and concerns regarding cost increases related to the project and to the project plans and engineering. Mr. Walvatne did provide sufficient security to allow the project to he constructed, hut did also reiterate his concerns regarding cost increases th.nt he would continue to pursue. The project was constructed in December of 1993. Mr. Walvalnc has expressed renewed concerns regarding project delays and related cost increases, and cost increases relating to engineering fees. Stall is in ihe piccess ol reviewing his concerns regarding the p.oject and the cost increases. .. . . . . .. DATE: TO: FROH July 1, 1995 Inv. Janes Morowczynski Acting Chief Gary Cheswick SUBJECT:Letter of Comaendation I wish to take this opportunity to commend you on your intuitive and professional work on the double homicide which occurred in Spring Park on April 25, 1995 - (Orono case 95-2466). After learning that the suspects were at the Mystic Lake Casino at approximately 2:16 am on April 25, 1995, the morning of the murders, you checked the routes from Spring Park to Prior Lake, notina the time of travel. It was then your idea to check the Narrows Channel for the weapons used, since taking the County Road 19 route provided the opportunity to dispose of the weapons into the water. The Hennepin County Sheriffs Department followed your suggestion and had trained divers check the channel and subsequently found both handguns. In addition you worked alon^ with the county detectives from the date of the homicide until the arrests of the suspects. Several of the Hennepin County Detective's told me that your assistance in the investigation really "pai.d off and helped make the case, which resulted in the necessary evidence against the suspects. cc: Orono Mayor and City Council Spring Park Mayor and City Council Orono City Administrator, Ron Moorse —T"».;.'«F**-'V-■*''•'^'*r>W':tv-'»a ••: • • . ' ":y• To: From: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Date:June 29, 1995 Subject:Land Use and Development Update 1. 2. 3. Oberhauser property on Dunwoody: Mr. Oberhauser has reportedly sold his home on Dunwoody Avenue conditioned on his removal of the structures on the adjacent properties by the end of September 1995. Spring Hill Conference Center proposal: A very preliminary idea for the use of the Spring Hill Conference Center was proposed to staff recently. This idea would be to use the Conference Center as an elderly care facility and to construct a number of "empty nester" single family homes targeted toward seniors who want convenient access to services that would be provided by the elderly care facility. A very preliminary idea for the redevelopment of the Lakeside Marina, North Shore Drive Marina and the homes in between the two marinas was recently proposed to staff. The proposed is for a residential development at a density of three units per acre. The current proposal is for all units to be contained in one structure to provide for as much open space as possible '^ith an approximate area of 10 acres, the property would accommodate 30 units at a density of three units per acre. i --- Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator July 7, 1995 Participation in Long Lake Com Days Parade This year ’s Cora Days celebration will be held on August 11, 12 and 13. The parade will be held on Sunday, August 13. The Mayor and Councilmembers are invited to participate in the parade. Please let me know if you plan to participate so that arrangements can be made to provide a vehicle or vehicles to ride in. > ^>• ' CITY of ORONO ^7'"i Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Keiley Parkway Crcno, VN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-C066 June 27, 1995 SENT BY FAX 6/27/95 William Johnstone, Chair Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Wayzata Boulevard Suite 160 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Ch tirman Johnstone: The Orono City Council has reviewed the draft 1996 LMCD budget, and has voiced a number of objections to the budget. The LMCD had indicated it would use a substantial amount of budget reserves to fund the 1996 budget, in order to reduce the reserves to the level needed for efficient fmancial operations. The only reserves proposed to be used to fund the 1996 budget are $50,000 of Eurasian Water MUfoil reserves. The Orono City Council believes the LMCD should use additional reserves to fund the 1996 budget. The Council also questioned whether the amount of funding proposed for the administrative budget was necessary to carry out the statutory purpose of the LMCD. To provide an oppormnit\' for these concerns to be addressed, the City of Orono requests that a public hearing be scheduled regarding the 1996 draft budget. Sincerely, //. Ronald J. Moorse Cirv' Administrator Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 i!^:r:; S' 'f ■Vi ■ •i'V it.-.»i ! V I ->5?r£stto5, / Julv 6, 1995 CITY of ORON Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. WN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 CC65 f ;■ Greg Nybeck Inierim Executive Director I.MCD 900 East Wayzata Boulevard Suite 160 Wayzata, MN 55391 Deer Mr. Nybeck: 'picas"provide the Ibnowing r.nancial information at your earhest convemence: 1 rash balances and fund balances for each of the LMCD operating funds and reserv’e accounts This should include the Admimstrative Fi’.nd, » Save the Lake Fund. Equipment Replacement Fund and any “*er s^.larjund^ or reserve accounts. Please provide these balances for year-end 1994, current, and projected ’95 year-end. 2.Projections of total e.vpendimres in each of the operating funds and reserve accounts for 1995. 3.Interest income in each of the operating funds and reserve accounts for 1994 and projected tor 1995. hUrin7SinT.^r?d^^bu1;?^^^ou^^^^^ requested, please call me. Thanks tor your help. Sincerely, ✓ V Ronald J.'Moorse City Administrator / I ✓ -7/ RJM/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 I i I I I I CITY OF ORONO. NONNESOTA Comparative Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Source December 31. 1994 and 1993 General fixed assets Land and land improvements Buildings and building improvements Equipment Total general fixed assets Investment in general fixed assets by source General Fund after IX'cember 31.1984 Special Revenue Funds after EX'cember 31.1984 Capital Project Funds after IX’cember 31.1990 EXrnations after EX'cember 31. 19S4 Years prior to January 1.1985 Total investment in general fixed assets 1994 Schedule 1 1993 $ 1.239.796 $ 1.129.796 3.205.130 3.210.130 1.303.129 1.192.284 $ 5.748,055 $ 5.532.210 $ 143.921 $ 131.710 754.192 545.558 3.989.224 3.989.224 4.025 4.025 856.693 861.693 $ 5.748.055 $ 5.532.210 -103- cm’ OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Schedule of General Fixed Assets By Function and Activity IX'cembcr 31. 1994 Schedule 2 Land and Land Buildings and Buildng Function and Aaivitv Improvements Improvements Equipment Total General government Council $s $3.868 $3.868 Administration —-27.685 27,685 Elections ——24.476 24.476 Assessing ——2,695 2.695 Finance -—26.198 2v6.19S Gtnemmcnt buildings 6%,358 1,999.912 145.919 2.842.189 Total general government 696.358 1.999.912 230.841 2.927.111 Public satetv Police ——290.235 290.235 Protective inspection and zoning —-46.737 46.737 Emergency preparedness -—29.155 29.1.65 Animal control ——238 238 Total public safety ——366.365 366.365 Streets —1.178.319 614.210 1.792..629 Parks 215.389 1.89^91.713 309.fK)I Other - unclassitlcd 328.049 _ 25.(KM)—353.049 ToUd general fixed assets $ 1.239.796 $ 3.205,13(L S J..303,12^$ 5.748.055 -104- I cm' OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Schedule of Changes in Genen»! Fixed Assets Py Function and Activity Year Ended December 31.1994 Schedule 3 Function and Activity General Fixed Assets January 1. 1994 Additions Deletions General Fixed Assets December 31 1994 General government Qiuncil $8.868 $$ 5,000 $3,868 Administratii>n 27,420 265 —27.685 Electic^ns 24.476 ——24.476 Assessing 2.695 ——2.695 Finance 23.325 3.214 341 26.198 Gtnemment buildings 2.842.189 ——2,842.189 Total general gtn emment 2.928.973 3.479 5.341 2.927.111 Public safety Police 274.010 42.261 26,036 290.235 Proteaive inspection and zoning 36.221 10.516 —46.737 Emergency preparedness 29.155 ——29.155 Animal control 238 ——238 ToUil public safety 339.624 52.777 26.036 366,3‘65 Streets 1.715.133 106.612 29.216 1,792,529 Parks 195.431 113.570 —309.001 Other - unciassitled 353.049 ——353.049 Total general fixed assets S 5.532.210 $ 276,438 $ 60.593 $ 5,748.055 -105- nrs' OI- ORONO, N!INNI.S0ta Future Properly Tax Levies to Retire Bonds (I) As of IXccmher 31. 1994 Schedule 4 Year Collectible 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1982 Improsement ___Bonds__ $5.500 (2) 700 600 500 S_L30_0_ 1985 Improvement Bonds $ 50.000 (3) 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 $ 300,000 1989 Water and Sewer Revenue Bemds 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds 1992 Improvement Bonds $ 80.000 (4) $ 250.000 (5)S 18.000 (6) $ 80,000 $ 250,000 $ 18.000 louil _^*vies $ 403.50(1 50.700 50.600 50.500 50,000 50.000 $ 655,300 (1)'Ibe levies for these issues are the gc*ncral t'bligation propertv tax levies which are in addition to the amounts levied in the special assessment rolls. Tax levies are placed (as icquired by law) at 105'.7 of debt service requirements. (2)The City levied $5,500 ftir the 1982 Improvement Bonds due to a projected .sht'rtfall prior to 1995. Ihe (’ity will continue to mcmitor the issue and levy additional taxes as required to generate sufficient sources to pay future debt requirements. (3)Ibe City levied $50,000 for the 1985 Improvement Btinds due to the assessment appeals and subsequent reductitrns of deferred assessments. In 1988. the City established future Uixes to generate sufficient sources to pay futua* debt requirements as required by law. (4)The City levied $80,000 for the 1989 Water and Sewer Revenue lionds due a shortfall in revenues. Projected development has not tKcurred. therefore user fees and property taxes are required to meet debt service payments. Ihe City will mimitor the issue and levy additional taxes as required. In addition, certain excess funds were transferred from the 1980 Improvement Ihmd l und to be used to fully meet the debt .service requirements of the 1989 Wa'ei and Sew er Revenue Bonds. (5)Ihe City levied $250.0(KI for the I9^i| |^Jblic l acilities Revenue Bonds for the 1995 lease-purchase payments. Ihe appropriation for the levy is made annually and is anticipated to cover appro.ximately 55'7 ol Ihe lease-purchase payment. (6) Ihe ('ity levied $18,0(K) lor the 1992 Improvement Bonds. Ihe bonds are to be paid 70',V from special assessments levied, and up to 3()''; to be levied in taxes. Prepayments of spec i.il assessments and interest earned thereon will determine the amount of taxes required from year to year. -106 •Statistical Section p STATISTICAL SECTION (l!NAUDITEm cnr OF ORONO, Minnesota General Revenue by Source (1) I Fiscal Year 1985 198fi (2) 1987 1988 IV'89 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Property Taxes $ 891.422 988.547 1.106.603 1.170.411 1.211.541 1.637.643 1.682.260 1.842.320 1.818.753 1.922.775 Special Assessments $ Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental $ 102.811 102.533 136.420 124.334 148.564 136.552 81.202 327.053 (3) 129.365 425.408 257.175 165.897 147.888 $ 453.488 525.735 499.864 489.319 493.385 135.512 178.901 316.871 497.165 539.226 Chiirges lor Services S 473.850 605.002 594.424 643.151 685.952 758.369 726.118 781.235 866.034 851.165 (1)Includes General. Special Revenue, and IXbt Service Funds. (2)Retlects the adoption ot GtncmmenLil Accounting Standards Btwd Statement No. 6. eliminating Special Assessment Fund Type.Debt Scrsice Funds were esurblishcd to account for general obligation debt previously recorded in Special Assessment Funds. (3)Prii'r to IXcembcr 31. 1992. special assessment revenue and interest income was included in I'thcr revenue. -107- J J I I p Table 1 Fines and Forfeits Interest Earned on Investments Other Revenue Total $ 61,611 $$257,624 $ 2.240.806 84,«77 —1.028.474 3.335,168 102,058 —717.467 3,156.836 140,657 —706.247 3.274.119 125,357 —676.838 3,341.637 108,231 -637,446 3.413,753 72.728 —504.819 3.246.028 62,458 282.582 (3)72.623 (3) 3.814.507 61,491 254,054 71.948 4.160.750 58.158 286.435 4.233.322 -lOS- CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA General Expenditures by Function (1) I Fis»:al Year General Gen’emment Public Safety Streets Parks and Recreatitrn Unallotted and Other 1985 $ 408.354 $946.828 $ 306,479 $43.659 $38.949 1986 (2)458.631 1,089.627 461.855 46,656 126.389 1987 535,558 1.187.328 385.422 94.114 63.154 1988 589.137 1.247.623 344,407 61.582 67.160 1989 655,987 1.376.323 494.742 32.961 95.164 1990 683.176 1.419.419 471.420 48.129 106.778 1991 652.105 1.508.485 474.350 44.791 165.228 1992 596.138 1,562.709 463.710 53.590 148.908 1993 656.849 1.609,867 495.483 58.080 152.547 1994 667.018 1.616.087 485.441 55.739 171.729 1 (1)Includes General. Special Revenue, and IX-bt Sers iee Funds. (2)Retlects the atk'ption ot CKnemmental Aceountinj: Suindirds Ii*vud Statement No. 6. eliminatini; Special Assessment Fund Type. Debt Service Funds were esuiblished to account tor general obligation debt previously recorded in Spe-eial Assessment Funds. -loy* I I I I I I I I Table 2 Debt Ser\’ice CapiUiI Outlay Total I I I I I I $ 42.241 $ 107,698 $ 1.894.208 743.450 95.240 3.021.W8 678,773 70,614 3.014.%3 534.876 92.198 2,936,983 475,520 131.437 3.262.134 426.393 259.921 3.415.36 406.266 46.147 3.297.372 403.209 164.708 3.392.972 562.254 4S.4S3 3.5S4.0ti3 938.991 201.192 4.1.^6.247 -no- CTTY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Property Tax Levies and Collcctii>ns Fiscal Year Colleaed Certified Tax Levy for Fiscal PeriiKl(l) Current Tax Collections (1X2) Percent of Levy CiMlected Delinquent Tax QM lections (2) Touil Colleeiions as a Percent of Current Levy 1985 $ 1.001.056 $967.543 96.7 91 $ 36,949 1(K).3 1986 1.089.634 1.060.820 97.4 36.316 KKI.7 1987 1.246.520 1.218,410 97.7 28.478 100.0 1988 1.293.426 1.257.297 97.2 27.998 99.4 1989 1.382.690 1.332.632 96.4 30,844 98.6 1990 1,638.246 1.579.616 96.4 41,984 99.0 1991 1.713.541 1.638,621 95.6 37.233 97.8 1992 1.961.381 1 .902..394 97.0 39,181 99.0 1993 2.120.835 2.1 >8(1.775 ^8.1 68.246 101.3 1994 2.281.570 2.246.902 98.5 53.629 100.8 (1)Touil ux levy and current tax collections include the Suite paid Htwesicad and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACa,. (2)r eludes County adjustments for abatements, cancellations, and additions of uixcs. -Ill- I J J J J J J i r I I I I I I Tabic 3 Outstanding Delinquent Taxes __ $ 90.476 63.690 45.770 53.65« 64.S66 71.166 86.352 128.786 123.136 81.796 Outstanding Delinquent Taxes as a Percent of Current Le\’V /(9.0 5.8 3.7 4.1 4.7 4.3 5.0 6.6 5.8 3.6 -112- CrrY OF ORONO. NUNNESOTA Assessed \'alue or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market V’aluc ot Taxable PropiTty (1) Taxes Payable Year Real Property Personal Properly Fiscal Disprities Adjustment to Assessed Value or Tax Capeity Assessed Value or Tax Capacity Estimated Market V^alue Assessed V'alue or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value 19«5 $ UKU 14.576 $ 3S3.130,(XK)$ 1,430.696 $ 3.327.200 $ 331.361 1986 98.788.864 385.901.800 1.542.969 3.588.500 446,042 1987 101.291,782 402.896.4(K)1,678.677 3,903.900 .581.055 1988 105.021213 431.023.1 (K)1.596.719 3.713.3(K)796.738 1989 (2)14,049.094 477.834.580 183.499 3.495.200 119.216 1990 12.568.353 527.348.000 172.131 3.401.800 151.7.30 1991 14.035.873 585.697.300 178.110 3.598.200 164.776 1992 12.922.819 604.793.400 195.919 4.124.600 45.844 1993 11.572.538 625.445..300 182.211 3.876,800 15.389 1994 12.780.145 6.84.919200 194.020 3.992.500 62.597 (1)All property, assessed. Uix eapitcity. and estimated market values, and fiscal disp;irities adjustment are from the Hennepin County Assessor. (2)Beginning with taxes pyable in 1^X9. the termini'logy tor As.sessed N’aluations and .Mill Riites is ni> longer used. Tax Cap.ieity replaces Assessed X'alaititms and is detemiined in the same manner except using smaller percenuiges tor each property class. -ll.V I Tabic 4 Ratio of Total Assessed V'alue or Total Tax Cafsicity Per Capita Valuations Assessed Value or Tax Cip;icity Estimated Market Value ti> Total Estimated Market V'alue Assessed V'alue or Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value $ 102,076.633 $386.4572(H)26.41 $ 14.541 $55.051 100.777.875 389.490.3(H)25.87 14.052 54.307 103.5512^14 406.8(H)200 25.46 14.358 56.406 107.414,670 434.736.400 24.71 14.747 59.684 14.351.809 481.329.780 2.98 1,945 65.2.30 12.892.214 530.749.80()2.43 1.787 73.582 14.378.759 589.295.500 2.44 1.969 80.692 13.164.582 608.918.000 2.16 1.803 83,379 11.739..360 629.322.100 1.87 1.602 85.327 12.91 1.56K 658.911.700 1.96 1.749 89,283 -114- cm OFORONO, MINNESOTA Property Tax Rales - Direct and (h erlappinp (jovemments (1) (Per $1.00() of Assessed Value or Tax Capiicity) I City of Orom> 1985 1980 1982 1991 1992 (•')(.^) Taxes Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Water Sewer Payable Cieneral Ser\'ice Serxice Service Service Serxice Operating Operating Year Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Touil 1985 9.78 MM 9.78 1986 10.8.;———-———10.83 1987 11.68 o.;9 ---—--12.07 1988 11.76 0.28 -—•-——12.04 1989 (2)9.42 0.21 ———-—-9.63 1990 I2..;6 0.27 0.14 —————12.77 1991 11.4;0.28 0.1:0.04 ——-—11.87 1992 12.02 0.36 0.12 0.04 1.69 -——14.23 199.;13.26 0.37 0.12 0.04 1.83 0.12 ——15.74 1994 1.V4.;0.35 -0.04 I./5 0.12 0.29 0.27 16.25 Ccrtiiin areas of the Gly are served by other schix)I districts. PrcYH^riy in those areas would K* subject to one of the followinj: rates instead the rate for ISD^JTS. laxes Payable Year ISD#276 ISD#277 ISD#284 19S5 55.93 49.75 46.51 1986 58.67 57.52 51.35 1987 61.55 53.56 49 88 1988 63.95 57.06 57.38 1989 (2) 58.06 47.92 .'50.56 1990 52.55 42..33 49.77 1991 55.36 45.78 50.28 1992 64.02 56.13 58.55 1993 74.18 58.97 64.91 1994 76.51 66.98 59 67 Ikpinning with Uixes payable in 1^89, the tenninology for Assessed Valuiitions and Mill R;ites is no longer used. Tax ( apacity replaces Assessed VaIu;itions and is eletemiined in the s;ime manner except using smaller percentages lor each property class.lax lixtension Kiitcs are de*termincd in a similar manner to Mill Kites in that the Uix levy is divided by the lax capacity. (renenil obligation water and sewer revenue* bond ek*bt. -115- Tabic 5 ISD #278 Schcx)l District (1) 53.54 59.51 55.08 59.50 50.01 47.17 52.74 59.80 67.19 65.03 /\rca V(>-Tc*ch Hennepin Schcxil County 1.49 1.54 1 42 1.49 1 22 1.10 1.05 0.51 1.10 0.81 29.26 29.69 29.36 31.67 27.10 27.92 30.11 .34.33 35.84 37.44 Metro C\xincib Transit 3.88 3.80 3.90 4.05 3.41 3.72 4.11 4.48 4.40 4.42 Other Special District.s 1..36 2.16 2.19 2.28 2 05 2.03 3.39 1.66 2.31 2.15 ToUt l 99.31 107.53 104.02 111.03 9.3.42 94.71 103 27 115.01 126.58 126 10 -116- CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Special Assessments Levies and Q>Ilections Fiscal Year 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Current Assessments Due $ 375,403 362,515 296,702 257.154 208,158 222,063 228,169 200,477 387,230 294.073 Current Assessments Q^llected $ 313.670 321.142 262.268 216.503 183.261 198,202 213.418 183.375 355.530 274,403 Ratio of Current Collections to Amount E)ue 83.6 88.6 88.4 84.2 88.0 89.3 93.5 91.5 91.5 93.3 Delinquent As.sessments Collected $ 40,196 25.765 23.446 68,506 17.604 35.565 14.419 18,390 9.338 23.295 -117- Table 6 Special Assessments Delinquent $ 159.058 136.302 147.635 90.023 61.562 43.766 43.313 54.657 55.507 55.159 Total Outstanding Assessments $ 2.047.811 1.247.407 1.021.321 764.234 663.372 735.609 5S1.04S 1.639.996 1.277.078 1.027.451 -118- . THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Tabic 7 ciry OF ORONO, mlnnesota Q)mputation of Legal EXbt Margin December 31.1994 Minnesota state law defines a city's legal debt margin as 2.09? of its estimated actual property valuation, less all Ixmds repayable solely trom tax levies, plus all sinking funds on hand to retire said debt. Rised on this formula, the City’s legal debt margin is as follows: Estimated total market value of taxable property Debt limit (2.09? of e.stimated actual pn^perty value) Ti>tal txmded debt $ 8.195.000 $658.911.7 00 $ 13.178234 Less bonds not repaid solely from tax levies G.O. Imprin ement Bsmds G.O. Revenue B<>nds Public Facilities Revenue Bonds ToUil amount of debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin 2.410.(HI0 1.950.000 3.835.(K)(2 8.r95.(Ki0 $ 13.17S.234 I I I I I I -119- CrP' 'A • ^ONO. MINNESOTA Ritiii tti Net General Rinded IXbt ti> Assessed \'alue or Tax Capacity and Net Bt'nded EX'bt Per Capiui Fiscal Year 1986 19S7 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Pc^pulation (2J 7.172 7.212 7.284 7.379 7.213(5) 7.303 7.303 7.330 7.3S0 Assessed \'a!ue (in l.(X)Os) $ 100.778 103.552 107.415 14.352 (4) 12.892 14.379 13.1b5 11.739 12.911 Gnvss Bonded Debt (j}_ $ 1.722.088 1.504.562 1.350.789 1.207 220 1.010.710 4.811.055 5.561..MO 5.734.084 5.362.830 Debt Serxice Funds Available (1} $ 1.354.M2 1.158..‘8i2 1.035.242 867.436 694.251 928.917 1.253.423 1.518.M9 1.349.726 Net Bonded EXbt $ 367.446 345.700 315..M7 339.784 316.459 3.882.138 4.307.917 4.215.435 4.013.104 (1)Includes bonds recorded in the General L'ng-Term D.bt Acc(>unt Group. Prior 1986. the Creneral Long-Temi Debt Account Group did not include any tax supfX'ited bonded debt. In 1986. the Special A>sessmcnt Fund Type' was eliminated and such be'nds were recorded m the General b>ng-Tenn Debt Account Group. Grtws bonded debt h.is been reduced by Debt SerMce deterred s,x.cial .issessments receivable in order to retlect only tax suppi>rtcd debt burden. Debt Service Funds available include amounts in UX'bt Sere ice Fund-s established in 1986 to service general (Obligation debt previiously recorded in Special Assessment Funds. Fior purposes ot this analysis. [X'bt Service Funds available do ni't include individual tund balance anaounts in excess (of the related individuiil btond issue- amount included m gross bonded debt. (2)Population trtom Metr^opi liun Council estimate as ot /\pril 1. anniutlly. (3)Rating history tnom Moiody Investors Service. (4)Beginning with fiscal year 1989. the temiinoU'gy for Assessed \’alu.itions is no longer used. Tax Capiicity replaces Assessed Valuations and is determined in the same manner except using smaller percentages ti'r each pri'perty class. (5)Federal ci nsus. (6)Tlie rating tor the 1991 Public Facilities Revenue Bonds issued by the City of Oriono’s Housing and RedeveK'pmcnt Authority is At. as the City is making lea.se-purcha.se piivments equ.ll to the anniul debt service requirement. Wliile the intent is tio continue the annu.ll p.iyments and budget annu.il appropriations, the City may termin.ite the lea.se as provided in the lease-purchase contract. -12(1 Table 8 Ratio ot Net- Tax Sur^irtcd Bonded Debt to A«;sessed Value Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Bonded Debt Rating (3) 0.36 ^7f $ 51.23 Ail 0.33 47.93 Aa 0.29 43.32 Ail 2.37 (4)46.05 All 2.45 43.87 All 27.00 531.58 All 32.72 589.88 All (6) 35.91 575.09 All (6) 31.08 543.78 All (6) -121- Fiscal Year 1985 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CriY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bi>nded Debt to Total General Expenditures (1) Principal $35.(KK) 1986 (2) 520.0(K) 485.fKK) 360.fK)0 325,(MX) 3(KM*00 300.000 155.000 150.000 5.50.0(H) Interest and Other $ 7.241 224.693 197.184 174.876 150.520 126..393 106.266 248.209 412.254 388.991 Total Debt Serx'ice 42.241 744.693 682.184 534.876 475.520 426.393 406.266 403.209 562.254 938.991 Total General Expenditures $ 1,894.208 3.02 l.M 8 3.014.963 2,936.983 3,262.134 3.415.116 3.297.372 3.392.972 3.584.(Hi3 4.136.247 (1)Includes General. Special Revenue, and Debt Serx’ice Funds. Table 9 Ratio of Debt Service to Total General Expenditures 2.2 97 24.6 22.6 18.2 14.6 12.5 12.3 11.9 15.7 22.7 (2)Beginning in 1986. expenditures previously reewded in Special Assessment Funds became a eeimpiment of EXbt Service Fund expenditures in aecordmee with (jovemment;il Acee>unting Standirds B*xird SUitement No. 6. -122- Table 10 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESO IA CompuUition of Direct and Overlappini: Debt December 31, 1994 (lovemmental Unit Gross Debt (IJ Sinking Funds Net Debt Net IXbt Applicable to Orono Percent Amount Direct debt City of Orono Overlapping debt School districts $ 5.362.830 $1.349,726 $4.013,1(U 100 000 4,013,1(W No. 278 (Orono) No. 276 (Minnetonka) No. 277 (Westonka) No. 284 (WayzaUi) 6,295,000 19.755.000 14.700.000 86.384.624 547.255 601,702 753.878 40.009.204 5.747.745 19.153.298 1.3,946.122 46.375,420 20.107 0.165 6.908 2.165 1.155.720 31.633 963.396 1.003.910 Hennepin County 67,780.(X)0 5.712.376 62.067.624 1.457 904.512 Metro council 87.860.(K)0 41.638.716 46.221.284 0.688 317.970 Metro transit 1.400.0(K)5M3.000 807.000 0.756 6.097 Suburban I lennepin parks 16.875,(K)0 1.459.316 15.415.^4 2.024 .312.056 ToUiI iiverlapping debt 301.049.624 91.315.447 209.7.34.177_4.695,294 Totiil direct and overlapping debt $ 306,412,454 $ 92,665,173 $ 21.3,747,281.$ S.708,,398 (1)Gross bonded debt used for the net debt calculation excludes revenue bonds for all governmental units except the City ol Orono. -123- cnr OF ORONO. minni:sota Revalue Bend Cmerage - Fnteiprise Funds (3) Tabic 11 Water Operating Fund Seuer Operating Fund Gn>ss Fiscal Revenues Year Oj Operating Ejtpenses Net Revenue Available Debt Scr\’icc Debt Service Requ irenients Principal Festal (xnerage 1980 S 159.586 S 2‘>..5(H>s S 17.917 S 17.917 l/>5 1900 16.3.271 101.797 —74.975 74.975 1.3b 1991 234.843 162.010 72.833 —'4.493 74.493 0.08 1992 221.691 171..373 50.318 —74.495 74.495 0.68 1993 16.^.178 150.15;15.224 88.530 69.931 158.461 0.10 1994 243.422 169.023 74.399 88.533 64.472 15.3.(H(5 0.49 1989 489.6.^8 299.797 189.861 17.499 17.499 10.85 1990 .S83.998 .VI5.980 278.018 -72.188 72.188 ,3.85 1991 61.3.(KI9 .343.2.30 269.770 -'2.755 72.755 3.71 1992 543.887 445.562 08..325 -■’2.756 72.756 1.35 1993 557.999 5(N.28(.48.713 8b.4“’0 68.324 I.‘i4.'’94 0.31 1904 7(18.(1.40 5i:.( 143 195.98'8f(.4b7 62.944 149.41 1 1.31 (1)Total revenues, including interest. (2)Total operating expenses, net of depreciation. (3)Revenue b<nds did not exist prior to .124. I CriY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Demographic Statistics Table 12 Fiscal Year 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Population (1) 7.020 7.172 7.212 7.284 7.379 7.213(5) 7.303 7.365 7.330 7.380 Per Capita Inwme (2) $ 18.217 18.990 20.096 21.239 22.584 23.705 24.200 * 24.9(H) • 25,5(K) 29.1(H) Schcx^I Enrollment (3) 1.978 2.CH)1 1.997 2.037 2.101 2.175 2.289 2.280 2.275 2.433 Unemployment Rate (4) 4.1 7f 3.9 4.1 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 3.2 Source: (1)Metro Q)uncil (2)Federal Census Bureau diui; Hennepin County average (3)Minnesou Dep.irtment of Education, as repimed by Orono Schtx^l District No. 278 (4)Minnesota Dep:inment of Economie Security; Hennepin County average (5)Federal Census *Estimate -125- (TH' OF ORONO. MINNIX )TA Priipcrty Value. C<Tistnictu»i. and Bunk IXp*»its TaWc 1.^ (<wnmcrcial Qcistructim (Ij Rtsidential CcTisiruciim (1) Fiscal Year lUH? 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 199.1 1994 Number ol PeimiLs 8 11 28 2.1 26 18 7 5 4 9 Value S 24.1.59.S 80.050 2.555.700 .1.920.090 162.700 1.5.17.750 4S9.050 .122.200 12..KXI 52.‘)00 Number of PemiiLs .114 .14.1 .14.1 .1.10 .160 .1.1.1 2.1.1 272 3(it) .108 Value ________Estimaled Market Value (2) In Jusinal Qinniercial 14.065.465 14.7.1.1.500 19.824.845 15.652.600 15.8.16.267 16.208.riOO 17.416.288 16.7.14.000 14.28.1.828 18..KM.100 6.641..199 21.79.S.21HI 14.242.621 22.4f-0..l0O 20.916.2'»0 21.6V>.2"o 16.489.721 21.2'*0.5(NI Resiikntial Ntn-Taxabic Bank rXpi^iLs (3) .168.666.200 s $ 18.521.9.1.1 .171.168..K10 —27..1.1 1.671 .187.24.1.800 22.32M30 2-5.2 l.l.tft.l .19.1.876.7(X)-25..15.i.o<ki 441.27< 1.880 -27.6'».1.0<I0 486.776.000 —2‘>.0.11.'t45 552.096.2'to -.10.''')(i.88(l 58:..1.1.1.1(HI -.1.1.624.'KKI 5‘>9.912..ioo .1.1..189.000 N I8.557.5(t0 2n.u3^)j»7u .11.‘>2.1.01X1 Si8Jrce: (1 )( ity Insixctinn I X'partnieiil. (2)Hennepin (liunly Assessing IXp.irtment; Residential includes f.inns; Non-laxable is valued by tlic County nice every six years. (.1) /Vs a-ported to(iTiimercial West by First Hank of tlie I.akes. -126- CFTY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA Tabic 14 Taxpayer Princip.ll Taxpayers Typi“ of Business Assessed 1994 Payable 1995 Tax Capacity Percent of Total Tax Capiicit Washington Scientific Manulacturing $ 125.655 0.97 9? Wayzata Countr> Club Private Club 104.752 0.81 Private Residence Single Family Residence 94.(KK)0.73 Private Residence Single Family Residence 81.602 0.63 V'an Dale, Inc.Manufacturing 69.073 0.53 Private Residence Single Family Residence 66.66S 0.52 Private Residence Single Family Residence 50.179 0.39 Private Residence Single Family Residence 49,(HI3 0.3S WixKlhill Country Club Rivate Club 44.629 0.35 Super V'alu Grt>cery Store 33.953 0.26 $ 719.514 5.57 I I N(.itc: Beginning with taxes fKiyable in 1989. the terminology tor Assessed Valuations and Mill Rites is no longer used. Tax Capiieity replaces Assessed X'aluiitions and is detennined in the .same manner except using smaller percenuiges tor each propi-rty class. Tax Extension Rites are determined in a similar manner U> Mill Rites in that the Uix levy is divided by the Tax Cap;icity. -127- Etate of lriO>rporation Form of gin ommcnt Area Miles of streets City Private State and Countv Number of street lights Fire protection Number of cities providing amtracted tire an crage Police proiecnion Number of suitions Number of pt>lice officers Full-time Part-time Number of cities ser\ ed Education Attendance centers Number of students Water and sewer operations Number of connections Water Sewer Recreation and culture Number of parks Number of swimming beach Employees Classified senice'full-time Part-time/seasonal Table 15 cm' OF ORONO, MINTSESOTA Miscellaneous Statistics December 31.1994 December 17.1954; effective January 1.1955 Optional Pl.in "A"; Counci 1-Administrator 24.5 squ;ire miles; 5(Kr is open water or marshland 45.83 15.42 29.28 120 1 16 4 4 4 2.433 800 1.770 12 with 65.20 loLil acres 3 with 1.40 total acres 42 19 -128- -I CTTY OF ORONO, NANNESOTA Tax Capacity. Tax Levies, and Tax Hxtcnsii>n R;»tes Table 16 Collectible in 1995 —1994 1993 Tax capacity Real property $12.780.145 $12.(X)7.816 3; 11.572di38 Personal property 194.020 183.655 182.211 Fiscal disparities contribution (319.38S)(329.096)(365.146) Fiscal disparities distribution 256.791 306.524 349.345 Total tax capacity $,12.911.568 $12,168^899 3; 11.738.948 Tax levies by County Auditor General Fund S 1.918.645 $1.893.492 31 1.800.235 Debt Serx'ice Funds 1985 Improvement Bonds 50.(KX)50.000 50.000 1980 Improvement Bonds ——16.100 1982 Improvement Bt'nds 5..‘'00 5.500 5.500 1991 Public Facilities Bonds 2.*^0.(M)0 247.620 249.0(X) 1992 Improvement Bonds 18.(K)0 16.51K)— 1989 Revenue Bonds ....80.000 — 68.458 ToUil Uix levies _2.322.14.^$2.281.570 3i _ 2,120.835 Tax extension rates by County Auditor(l) General Fund 12.753 '7 13.428 C?13.261 7( Dibt Serx ice Funds 1985 Improvement Btmds 0.333 0.354 0.369 1980 Improvement B*mds ——0.119 1982 Improvement Bonds 0.043 ().(*39 0.040 1991 Public Facilities Bonds 1.717 1.751 1.835 1992 Improvement Bs'nds 0.139 0.117 — 1989 Revenue Bonds 0.619 0.563 -------------------------- Total tax extension rates ___15jSp4 '7 16.252 7f 15.624 n I I I (1)Tax levies include the suite fuiid Homestead and y\griculiural Credit Aid (1 lACA). -129- I ' I THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLV BLANK •Indapandant AikMot’s Rapoit on bitamalControl Structura and Othar Rac|uiradRaporls i MALLOY moimtaoue KARNOWSkl PRINCIPALS KFNNfTHW MAUOV CPA THOMAb M MONlAQUt CPA THC)MAS a KAHNOWSKI CPA PAUl A HAfKiStVICH CPA INDEPENDEN': AI DITOR’S REPORT ON THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRl'CTURE BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the yeir ended December 31. 1994. and h.ne issued our report thereon dated May 17. 1995. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Cimiptroller General of the Lnited States. Thi'.se standards require that %ve plan and perform the audit to (»btain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. In planning and performing our audit of the general purpt>se financial statements of the City of Oront' for the year ended December 31. 1994. we considered its internal control structure in t)rder ti> determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing oui opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control .structure. The management of the City of Orono is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control •Structure In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expectrrl benefits and related co.sts of internal control structure policies and procedures The objectives of an internal control .structure are to prm ide management with reasonable, but not absolute. a.‘surance that assets are safeguarded against loss frc^m unauthorized use or dispi>sition. and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of general purpose financial .statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not he detected Also, projection of any evaluatiim of the .structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. (continued) I f ifAMK r4A!i(i»4Al MAfili Ht ii|. t*. ■ .VA«/ATA Ml iM t vAfM I At*' * IS MiNNt Si • ‘ 'I f‘ 1 I M»»< »«,. •.1.’ M‘, J t.' J TI ! I f A» .• M'l -130- THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK I ] I I J I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure policies and pr(x:edures in the following categories: cash receipts/revenue. cash disbursements/expenditures, payroll, and external financial repuning. For all of the internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and pr(x:edures and whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk. Our consideration of the internal control .structure would not necessarily disclo.se all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose financial statements being audited may ix;cur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above In our management report to the City Council, issued in connection w ith our audit of the City's general purpose financial statements, we have separately communicated our observations and recommendations regarding other matters. This report is intended for the information of the City Council and management of the City »'f Orono. How ’ever, this report is a matter of public record and its distributiim is not limited. Mav 17, 1995 -131- I M<^MALMIIY ____ fsggiy®” PRINCIPALS KLNNtTHW MAILOY CPA IHOMASM MONIAOUE CPA THOMAS A KAHNOWSKI CPA PAUt A nAtX)StVICM CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S COMPUANCE REPORT BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono. Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Oron*>. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1994. and have issued our rep*irt thereon dated May 17, 1995. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Tho.se standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reascmable assurance about whether the general purptise financial statements are tree of material misstatement. Compliance w ith laws and regulation'* applicable t») the City of Orono is the responsibility of the City's management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the City's compliance w ith certain provisiiins of laws, regulations, and contracts. However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results ('four te.sts indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the City of Oroni' complied, in all material resj ects. w ith the provisions referred to in the preceding paragraph. With respect t(' items not te.sted. nothing came to our attentiim that caused us to believe that the City had not complied, in all material respects, with those provisions. This rept'rt is intended for the information (if the City Cc'uncil and management of the City of Oronc*. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. May 17, 1995 CBMTiriKO ACCOOMTAMTI nfji-ALo- f«At»(jfiAi inmnifi', •.WAV/AfA MM f VAt<l) MiNNI AIHmIS ViTA M I f t'HMfa rit;» S4‘. l| 1 I I Ajf S4S -132- IrlXX MAU^PY MONTAGUE KARNOW8KI tilAPpSEVipH GCO,PlA. PRINCIPALS KENNETH W MALLOY CPA THOMAS M MONTAGUE, CPA THOMAS A KAfTNOWSKI. CPA PAUL A HAOOSEVtCH CPA INDEPENDENT AL'DITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS City Council and Residents City of Orono Orono, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono. Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31. 1^4. and have issued our report thereon dated May 17. 1995. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the provisitins of the Minnesota Lecal C<Tmpliance Audit Guide for Local Government promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Fitrce pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing prtTcedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Lecal C>'mpliance Audit Guide for Local Government covers five main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements Our study included all of the li.sted categories. The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested the City (Tf Orono cc^mplied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions. Further, for the items not tested, based on our audit and the procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City had not complied with such legal provisions. This report is intended for the information of the City Council and management of the City of Orono. However, this report is a matter of public record and iis distribution is nt't limited. May 17, 1995 C«MTir>fcO Ac:c:oi.>iisixAiMT» »iATlor*Ai tlA?4K {iUU I H?4{ . StMWA' 'A»A HOtn I VAH|> MiNftf AIH>| I . MiNfil '/lIA Tf I f t A*Vf.-133- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE:July 7. 1995 ITEM NO.: j Department Approval: Name Ronald A. Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report The 1996 budget development schedule includes two budget work sessions. The first, to be scheduled the week of July 24, is to review the preliminary budget overview. The Council may at this time want to schedule the first budget work session. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTSTED: Motion to set the time and date for the lirst 1996 Budget Work Session. ^OUNCIL MEETING MJL 1 0 1995 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CIT\ Of ORONO DATE: July 7, 1994 ITExM NO • • Department Approval: Name Ronald A. Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report It^m Description: Resolution Proclaiming August 1, 1995 as National Night Out The North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition is coordmating a community "Night Out" event to be held on Tuesday. August 1. 1995. The event will be an ice cream social in the parking lot of Rick ’s Super Valu in Navarre. In recognition of this event as part ot the "National Night Out", the Crime Prevention Coalition has requested the City adopt the attached resolution proclaiming Tuesday, August 1, 1995 as "National Night Out" in Orono. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution proclaiming Tuesday, August I, 1995 as "National Night Out" in the City of Orono. A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 1995 WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August I, 1995 called National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the " 12th Annual National Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for the City of Orono to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative, police/community crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition plays a vital role in assisting the Orono Police Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in the City of Orono, and is supporting "National Night Out 1995" locally; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Orono be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and the impact their participation can have on reducing crime, drugs, and violence in Orono; and WHEREAS, police/community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and cooperation arc important themes of the "National Night Out program, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby cell upon all citizens of Orono to join the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting "nth Annual Nattonal Ntght Out on August 1,*1995. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, the Orono City Council does hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 1, 1995 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in the City of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST; Dorothy M, Hallin, City Clerk Etlward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Pace 1 of 1 r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE ITEM NO.: I ■•• JUL JO 1995 /1 Department Approval: Name John Cerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Repon Item Description: Resignation for Retirement - Wayne Quast, Public Works Supervisor On July 5, 1995. Public Works Supervisor Wayne Quast submitted his resignation to be effective July 28, 1995. Wayne will be retiring after fourteen y<»ars of employment w ith the City of Orono and a total of twenty-four years of municipal service. Wayne has been a valued employee and will be greatly missed. As set out in the City's Personnel Policy, an employee leaving in good standing receives a payout of one-third of total accumulated sick leave, with a maximum of 960 hours of accumulation, and all vacation time not exceeding 240 hours. Wayne will receive: 320 hours sick le-tve @ $17,549 = $5,615.68 172.04 hours vacation @ $17,549 = $3.019.13 $8,634.81 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To accept Wayne Quast’s resignation effective July 28, 1995 and to approve the preliminary severance amount of $8,634.81. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ;TJriXILMEETi:.’G JUL 10 1995 CfTYOfORONO DATE. July 5, 1995 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed: L_________ Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Temporarv' Employment Orono Golf Course Due to the resignation of a counter helper at the Crono Golf Course, it is necessary to fill that position Therefore it is recommended to employ Nathan Walker as a temporary counter helper at the Orono Golf Course effective June 30. 1995 .tt an hourly rate of $6.00 per hour. The above position is for a six month period from actual stan date which is June 30, 1995. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To employ Nathan Walker as a temporary counter helper at the Orono Golf Course effective June 30, 1995 at an hourly rate of $6.00. ^.ridress.- - - - - --— _ Location of Parade or Event - - - - - Person(s) and/or Organitation(s) Handling the E/ent Hours of -........ n Amount: Date of Event:___Sli?_55I^^ Reason or Purpose;, ^c^CiT ^S^r°"inSr-ber;l/lcf.es f. be TCSit^erwl;. this appi.^n T am aware of all special events and will abide by arise directly or indirectly ?5rthfpa«'d% "ol'spVoial'tvent approved by the granting of this perml . Date Signature Approved; Remarks; Denied ; L lTf CF_ CrriLi v:v »f • fc.'V . •“ •■*■ , . I • ■ .* . >1 I A W**T V' V'VV'V J1 ;':v ....../i,......_ 't' i-e.' . ^:^CIL MEETING 3 0 1995 REQL^ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ORONO DATE: June 8. 1995 ITEM NO:0 Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section: LicensesNameDorothy Halltn Title Citv Clerk Item Description: Licenses ------------------------------------------ Special Events Permit Long Lake Com Days Fool Pace Hackberry Park on Willow Drive South to Brown Road North to Orchard on Brown Road West to Holbrook Park COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve above listed licenses munch meeting 1 0 1995 ri CB PRREGOR 2135 EMP 4722C4F54 47168P06J 474563339 476921019 471840071 475443062 468113870 468043008 472503991 469526026 475939721 468021018 463622340 472529GC7 463701868 469636562 468420032 474667812 475380151 477500666 47544424? 477463877 471569363 473141624 477647279 471840180 4725C0574 121262417 SALv-H, JERCi*!E a:jderson, pf/jce l BOBZIEN,SUE A BORIS,SCOTT W BCSMA,j;04IE L, BRINKHAUS,JOHN F CALLAGHAN,JEREMIAH CARLSON,MICHAEL B CHESWICK,GARY B CCRNICK,JAaMES L DEMBCUSKI,JAY C ENGLISH III,IRVING ERICKSON,OCUGLAS J ERICKSON,KURT R FISCHENICH.DAN T GAFFRCN,MICHAEL P GERHARDSON,JOHN R GREGORY,JAMES D HA T ^ T N,DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING,CARC jP- J HASFMA.N,CAROLE JOHNSON BRADLEY P JOSTRCM,FOREST J KJkRNITZ,RICKY D KOJOLLENBERG, KRISTIN KUEHN, THOMAS M MABUSTH,JEAILNE A DPT 93 31 31 31 12 42 35 31 31 31 31 31 93 31 31 33 42 4 2 45 31 12 31 93 31 31 15 33 YTD GROSS 353.40 26797.47 15097.67 17323.09 8396 .49 23134.00 1607.64 5120 24843 25747 25064 24442 299 22611 2280i 21735 32330 18541 19724 17400 9678 14951 23994 338 2115 5499 31977 27220 . 76 . 34 , 05 .75 94 ,00 64 35 69 78 28 19 55 64 42 72 10 13 36 48 95 CL"RRE?r GRCS. 114.0 2040.1, 1071.2v 1204 .a«^ 534.7^ 1656 .Oc 528.3: 44 8.3 : 1774.5* 2193.0^ 1962.3: 1033.3 50.5 1611.5: 2058.9 1555.5: 2357.7: 1163.04 1340.0( 1315.2^ 574.8 964.0: 1747.49 182.7C 224.4: 422.59 2288.4: 1948.oe 475344512.•^CINTYPE. WILLIAM E 93 1759.60 249.40 480043542MCNICHCLS, t'AVID L 31 23445.48 1972.02 477561040MELTCN,NEIL W.31 1826.23 465.67 4*; 0987727HILLER,CHRISTOPHER 15 16003.33 1100.32 4777C0023MOORSE,RONALD J 12 35692.15 2649.44 334506281KCRCWC2YNSKI,JAMES 31 24041.83 1007.92 477028779NELSON,DAVID D.35 273.32 112.54 473100428OAS, DANIEL 0 93 1667.00 316.20 460909535CBERAIGNER, SCOTT G 4 2 17672.27 1143.63 476793251OBRIEN,RAIiDY L 92 17782.22 1540.39 476866274OLSON, JOHN C.15 13644 .36 1017.69 470700901OMAN, LYLE E 33 21735.67 1555.52 469840107PALMER,GREGORY A 42 17342.33 1143.67 471487919PERSELL, WILLIA,M R.31 5095.13 527.39 4741677^^5PETERSON, JACK W 93 2453.85 313.50 475382983 CUAST, WAYNE A 92 20615.77 1130.24 473746173RATHBUN, BARRY J 92 17267.53 1143.68 173609629ROSS, JOHN A 93 713.40 150.00 468320409RUTHER, ALVIN C.93 359.10 68.40 70566529SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B 31 17292.66 1758.39 69629194SKREEN, DALE S 42 17509.15 1143.60 75569177STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 93 10724.16 1340.00 67460042SULLIVAN,STEPFiEN X 31 62C92.69 2177.28 67460042SULLIVAN,STEPHEN X 31 62692.69 34308,05 •'7460042SULLIVAN,STEPFtEr; X 31 62692.69 72563051THCMTCN, MARK R 31 22608.57 1759.27 74663296TC.MCFFECK,LAWRENCE F 31 23673.46 1818.50 70704904TCMC2YK, MARK W 31 22561.27 1611.52 75505292VANG, BRUCE L 33 10322.15 1340.00 60629408VEE, LINDA S 12 15400.001071.20 77881539WECKKAN, STEPHEN J 33 17361.40 1242.48 103,604.28 asKS3=s=aflis 07/31/95 PR: CM PRREGOR .56 YTD CURRENl EMP NA.ME DPT GROSS GROSS 469138026CALLAHJLN , EDWARD J 11 2100.00 300.00 18324677GOETTEN,J.DIANN 11 1691.69 241.67 470366069KURR, JOELLEN L 11 1691.69 241.67 473646272JABBOUR,GABRIEL 11 1691.69 241.67 476527106KELLEY,CHARLES 11 1691.69 241.67 1,266.68 s = = 3 a s s r SEE OVERSIZED DOCUMEriT!! vwmw^\—/ ‘11 PREUMMARY PLAT OR FOX HOLLOW •X/- n>M. 0r^» M£m^ r \ Vifli.Qmimi;vv / tAl4r ' •:.. J-- m / r56*r S.?C“L) 1(1 / 'I.tairzKr aod -i,,- iJ iebo^7>oi4 go9 3/ ^ V qi PREmnEO FOR: JAMES BRUCE HOMES PWRAmO BVi tCHOCLL A MAOtOM. mcr\ IWMNIM •MIVtWM *n*lMf»« ftOM. TtRtWf «lH»WK MMMmAt U»V«C«« «••••MTIATA SOMEiMM mmmfomkh, vmmmt* »a»m 9«««tA«1 VAR: •««-•«•« QUOKEBII ui« EM 1 rrciowi AOomoR mrndk t lOJTm/IODmOM Kc«Ei«l»»RiiMM9W •m^. mMi hM I iiliKj •«»• Ijiinin EwcrEu Im ( oaravr «V witf LH } tianoa m m i MM0 at Rnrih M aagPMR 41 m MMt tot 2 ■ (AHnPirjg of M 90 Im( 1b lha patU ¥ BRKyftod »«RC« Mor« 19 IfiRRi 02 wamift 1$5 00 *M« and mmI tma fPwft ibmm rb B ph I Of feafMROif of«« Bna » BB 10 ROCMR Uit « iSHmi si aBOMLJOTM ••bMin nn iwMMmt teun« >r«x>(M|*» *vm »0my '*wmt »»P.I tfn ru > «»»* Iwt «K»« twi»iKltii>' .’-i r»Tl ISroM HDn«n(«<v »« 1 k« alw« 1»1 «I Cxtaf^ n<M« n« r-x» -----rf 0imrmi I T>« mnl i.ol « •«* 1 »r«icwva ACOmCN •«• an '■tMwi* >—mt •> •■» •« lr»»> *’ win aw I 2* mwk* iMM « 2«nn« LR lA ( r-ani—< M • 1 Ml •A im* aucHumi »H» " lan—i^ *•» iA I ' AM «n MMl M* •) LmI SMM •«« •ouKl sf •i.'O M iHOVD »M»I lal t L«1 •T tJB MM urn mi OOM I •7 !« UM Mm2 mm I k« 3 ....MMM m m. I mi mm gmm 2*1 M< >*M M of« MM «MM f — ft0t.-------OMMfMMMt «MMe* M • ••» Can •A2e*Mi Cai'i—l tm taring TmZrz f OR foe* cABMlIiiOl ^rr*•Jt' .4.K^ I RORfB]) TRRt tAII t«^a«»Y RBt B*‘>»R*^4 I0¥fr mr MBorvUIOR ARR tR«t I •• • i UOOM4 i*R« Sor^^OJ^^r oRBtr tRa IRo *f Mlftnawlt. -.{I'JT'»> Tlae?*^ T!a Sm'« a«u 20,itcoRM Ro. iHM I 1 W.ITZKI MlOtTKM atHWilHOTK %»u**ng Item fmmit OraM I m tm ntmmt pm *mm t 132 700««uMlaM*w KMMsmm JUU Mm Mat tM t33 tqum Mt a> 114M aamt rwrn n TMpMiftaii amt latmf MomM I •■Ml. aiMi IM a mu MMHt tmmt kMnntilMiM •( tm* L«Jm r ^ Mi« la 1 tMm* an an ■ a MM M ta ta paan aknaamn^ a Ka m a M «M M M anri tai ata taa ananMnf Maanlaa m • Ma aaaaarif l.M taat a« aa far aoMtt taa attllla 0arpttn . araaarta. anatr at araai T>« pal a la 1 1 SmiMMnTiCM 11 n.iTM4 acornM hhiMimla « a% a Pa Maaag PaaanM Ma I a aa I ( caaai a aap La 2 aanaa an an aniaa a* >iann| a IMfa M Mraii 41 aaniaaa 21 aaawWa MPa aaanp aa •«* Ma a aaa la 2 a PaMma a i$ W Ma a Pa pani a appaaaip a Pa aa a kp pakerkap Pama ka« tp fapraaa 02 an aa i 10 wapnaa Eaa a a ata na a IM M aa aa aaa Ma Paip a nnwaan Q cm » HMI< ar Maar a_ apictit oat M_______ fWKiil Ttal pal a La 2 OkK* 1 KLIT/U MXNTOa aecaapa^ a Pa riiiiaiMil pM tank MaciMaa Mp aa ana tap a .. 10___ Papa canar a aap La 2 lanca an an satanM Oaa nnoaao<»MPariai«1 "Miapa21 pp>aaaMkaaanoPaaoapaa a aaP La 2 a PiiMnaa a M M aa k Pa paa a kPomanp a Pa Ma a kn MkcrakP kamallwM ItPaykkaMn aaMi Ifl kPimiM Ua k Mktaa k a lU 00 aa anP aaP Ma PaalanaMkni •00a PPM «ev(SiONS Kyim ^1^ CERTIfiCA (ON ^'1.^__^ oaa *P«.' M.WMB Laaat Na IMM f- SCHOOL ft MAOSON. IMC. IMMWgi • MMTfCMi • HMOtt m TOMB .OMUGMMlMtML WlMCft •MM aMMiB 10111 r— tun « <t«t) M ^ CLIENT JAMES BRUCE HOMES I , '1. -VI(ON ORONO, MINNESOTA S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60067-026