Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-26-1995 Council Packet
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 26, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINTsESOTA Asterisk iteins are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA 2. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING Regarding Willow Drive Improvement 3.Interview Park Commission Applicants 7:30 p.m. Irene Silber 7:35 p.m. Andrew McDermott JUN 2 6 1995 CITY OF ORONO Interview Plarning Commission Applicants 7:40 p.m. Elizabeth Wright 7:45 p.m. Elizabeth Hawn 7:50 p.m. Richard McFarland 7:55 p.m. Kevin Dulin 8:00 p.m. Milton Bix 1 P c / APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 5. Regular Meeting of June 12, 1995 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 6. #2023 Betty Sumner, 3131 Casco Circle - Variance - Resolution 7. #2024 James Wilson, 2565 Lydiard Avenue - Conditional Use Permit #2027 Richard Lee Kail. 3753 Casco Avenue - Variance - Resolution 9. Draft Letters to Potential Sewer Neighborhoods - Confirm Dates - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMIN i.S»RATOR’S REPORT 10. Request fi.i o*f-Sale Liquor License 11. Preliminary Plans for County Road 15 - Resolution 12. City Facilities Landscaping Final Payment {13. Transfer of Funds CDBG Al4. Request by Police Department to Dispose of Police Squad <15. Acceptance of Donation 15. Employment Matter AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 26, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (•17.) LICENSES (•18.) BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 06/26 06/26 06/28 07/04 07/10 07/13 07/17 07/19 07/24 Orono School Board 1:30 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Orono School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. HOLIDAY - Independence Day (Tuesday) Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. (Thursday) Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m Council meeting 7:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION ^^-CQgNCIL J) PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE ^ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAIO: (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER ,1\<V- WOT T~ 5._______ 6.. 7.. 8.. 9.. 10.. 11*. 12.. 13.. 14., 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 7 I ptv\ #3 f 5030 CIL J /99^ W FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. present for (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER *7 '{/<?1 pjy\ Oo^ • \ I *-«• *—• *-< »-« 2 i -3 a* S’<\ OJ-» o o E t? >Is Io ^ 11 P Cl - ^ rj ” ® 2> !ii a *Tj 0 K- 1 ?§••8 o D p p tZ3 *0 O 5 in 3 £ »c;s I ”1 y.oam ?3 ^ o C ^ M S • b r- K U1 5 o fl _t5_ (jn b'- H O Cl ?3 cn >13 O 3 *<o ?3rio 5n P VO 00 ^ o\ O 3 O 3» t-J 3 "SI O O 1^ K> 4^ u> N O y o ^JT "T3 o ?3H C-' v% iA ? c td p o ^se= EP P M tiliJ Ov ^ •— r^n rH O ?0 CO r n oo V* !3 H 3I o CO / p §• no 9 5 O y no V no 9 5 CO ov25 3^ o Ut EJ ^ 00 ^ ^ ***J Q CA Oi *4^ A O O O T3 *0 *0 *0 *0 3 3 3 *3 3 P 3 3 -j ‘-J U1 U)u» o Cl »a *o 3 3 t3r-0 3 • •oo fl C Cl ^ l| 0 V 9 1 n R ,n § S Cl CO Ov SS’ffEC’ O D ^ X g. ^ •n ^ lU ^ X* 5d ^ Cl 00 B' V tio « 2.5rS-Ds- s- u.•-»Cl •nn UCl no o n3sr " p ^ 3. ^ Ti, c/> na J0L_ O*Cl •1 % a 3. *<a O O y COm > Ow > orr nPr o p n > Oo w §1~A O *»1 8§ 58 Si p R tn j-4 n JWL REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Jh> '' ^fOr X*VJ DATE: June 22,’(994 ITEM NO:0 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: li'^i Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Public Hearing Regarding Willow Drive Improvement Project Description In conjunction with the Highway 12 safety improvement project, which involves the imtallation of a semaphore at the intersection of Willow and Highway 12, a portion of Willow Drive on the north side of Highway 12 needs to be reconstructed to match the reconstructed intersection. The project involves the reconstruction of Willow Drive from Highway 12 north 650 feet (approximately to the northern extent of the Otten property.) The reconstruction is to provide for channelization to match the new intersection at Willow and Highway 12. The City Engineer will review the design of the planned improvement at the beginning of the public hearing. Purpose of Public HearinR The purpose of the public hearing is to provide an opportunity for citizens to provide comments regarding the planned improvement. The property owners adjacent to the proposed improvement have been notified of the public hearing and that a portion of the costs are proposed to be assessed to the adjacent property. They have also received an estimate of the p*"'poscd assessment amount based on assessing 25% of the project costs to the adjacent property owners. The estimated assessment amount is $19,711.50 for each of the two property owners. Although this information was provided, this hearing is focused on the improvement itself rather than the funding method or assessments. There will be a formal assessment hearing held at a ftimre (tetc at which time the adjacent property owners would have an oppoitunity to comment regarding the assessments. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Council adopt a resolution calling for the Willow Drive improvement project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution calling for the improvement to Willow Drive RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR WILLOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a motion of the city council adopted the 22nd day of May, 1995, fixed a date for the council hearing on the proposed improvement of the intersection of Trunk Highway 12 and 650 feet north on Willow Drive, aiKl WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 26th day of June, 1995, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an oppommity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA; 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted this 26 day of June, 1995. 2.Plans and specifications prepared by Glenn Cook, engineer for such improvement pursuant to council resolution, a copy of which plans and specifications is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the city clerk. Adopted by the council this__day of_____, 1995. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk CSZ»3.tO PUBLIC HEARING WILLOW DRIVE - MSAP 152-lOMI STREET IMPROVEMENT ORONO, MINNESOTA File 13962 June 26,1995 I. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Reconstruct street with turn lanes, concrete median, concrete curb & gutter, and drain tile. II ESTIMATED COST Reconstruction with turn lanes $157,692.00 111. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS Proticct Cost $ 157,692 Assessed Amount $39,423. Assessable Footage 764 Cost per Foot $51.60 Cost/Parcel $19,711.50 I M .ITM 3%2\TUBUC HRO basclmcOf EXJSTWC S CITY OF ORONO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Notice IS hereby given that the City Council of Orono will meet in the County Chambers of the City of Orono. 2780 Keney Pahfway at 7 00 p m on Monday. June 26. t995, to consider the making of an improvement at the intersection of Trunk Hidhway 12 and 650 feet north on Willow Drive, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Sections 429.CM to 429 111 Tne area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the property abutting on such street. The estimated cost of such improvement is St3 1.982 50 Such persons as desire to be heard witr^ reference to the proposed improvement w i* be heard at this meeting. O0''0thy M Halhn City Clerk (Published m The Laker and Pioneer June 12 and Jur>e 19. 1995) Affidavit of Publication state of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound. Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed cV ‘ f t lA which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for Q successive weeks: !t was first published Monday. theA^day of and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the.day of. Subscribed and sworn to me on this day of__.19 ^ By:• K _______^---^ ^ MaUaiJS4>iic MARSHA OAVEV nota;:v rnjauc-iataoTA HENNEPIN CX)UNTY vYcpwM exMcsoiovaanaia inKnaaiteni (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $11.48 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above maner: $11.48. (3) Rate actually charged lor above maner: $6.47 per inch. Each additional successive week: $4.45. 1 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Dorothy M. Hal 1 in. City Clerk, of the City Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice Public Hearing concerning proposed assessment for improvftmftnts- to Willow Drive 650 f»^^ nnrf of :i_nfPrspcMQD-W3.th trunk----- cm’ OF ORONO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Orono will meet in the Council Chambers of the City of Orono, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, June 26, 1995, to consider the making of an improvement at the intersection of Trunk Highway 12 and 650 feet north on Willow Drive, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the property abutting on such street. The estimated cost of such improvement is $131,982.50. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk Published in the Laker/Pioneer Newspaper the weeks of June 12 and 19, 1995 052395.1 # • • • liO. o V! VV- ■j ^ CITYofORONOPO BOX 66CRYSTAL BAY. MINNESOTA 553210066 CITY of OllONO PO DOX66 CRYSTAL BAY. MINNESOTA 35323 0066 .............. •6/ A/ '''II Ml II l< •- > A|r U : p 34-118-23 22 0014 CLIFFORD & LOUISE OTTEN BOX 249 LONG LAKE MN 553bt • 1' r 4*> ■>* \ kj - mil-1'? US !•«):.IA i, 1 0 0.121 V'l V 33-118-23 11 0003 ORONO PLAZA REIERSGORD LAW FIRM 4945 HALIFAX AVE S SUITE 7 EDINA MN 55424 i . I ' * ^ I I®... ^ i'j •»'’‘'>^'L ». V,^ !;> iV-'l 4*' June 9, 1995 GlTYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Clifford & Lx)uise Onen Box 249 Lons Lake, Minnesota 55356 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Otten: Enclosed is a notice of a public hearing regarding an improvement project for Willow Drive indicating that a ponion of the cost of the improvement is proposed to be assessed to the abutting propenies. Your property is one of two properties abutting the improvement. It is proposed that 25 % of the total cost of the improvement be assessed to the tibutting property owners. The total cost of the improvement is $157,692, twenty-five percent of this is $39,423.00. Your proposed share as one of two abutting property owners would be $19,711.50. If you have questions regarding the project, the public hearing, or the assessment amount please call John Gerhardson, the City’s Public Works Director at 473-7357. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorsc City Administrator Enclosure Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 O.. ®V,€lTYof ORONO MnoJdpal Offices Street Mdress: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Maillni Iddress: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Orono Plaza Reiersgord Law Firm 4945 Halifax Avenue South Suite 7 Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Sirs: Enclosed is a notice of a public hearing regarding an improvement project for Willow Drive indicating that a ponion of the cost of the improvement is proposed to be assessed to the abuning properties. Your property is one of two properties abuning the improvement. It is proposed that 25% of the total cost of the improvement be assessed to the abutting property owners. The total cost of the improvement is $157,692, twenty-five percent of this is $39,423.00. Your proposed share as one of two abuning property owners would be $19,711.50. If you have questions regarding the project, the public hearing, or the assessment amount please call John Gerhardson, the City’s Public Works Director at 473-7357. City Administrator Enclosure Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 tw Ji»Cu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: JUN P 6 1995 ju C{^,QMM0N0 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Interview Park Commission Applicants Attachment: 1. Applicant’s Application Form for Park Commission 2. Park Commission Applicant Interview Question Form (2 copies) At the June 12 meeting Council interviewed 5 applicants for the Park Commission. One applicant was out of town that week and requested to appear at the June 26 meeting. Prior to the June 26 meeting one applicant who initially expressed interest in the Planning Commission requested consideration for the Park Commission appointment. The following times have been assigned to the Park Commission applicants: 7:30 p.m. Irene Silber 7:35 p.m. Andrew McDermott The attached sheets of interview questions are for Council ’s use during the interview process. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Application for Orono Parks Comission JAN 3 1995 ( J Irene Silber 4625 West Branch Road Mound, MN 55364 Home: 472-6678 Office: 95109»7 Resident of Orono for four years Work Experience Honeywell, Inc Minneapolis, MN Marketing Communications Manager Home and Building Control Division 1992 - present Public Relations Manager Commercial Buildings Group 1991 - 1992 Star Tribune Minneapolis, MN Public Relations Manager 1991 - 1993 International Market Square Minneapolis, MN Communications Manager 1985 - 1989 Prex ious experience as nexx spaper editor, public relations agency account supervisor and advertising agency copx'yxriter Education Randse Afrikaans Universiteit, Johannesburg, South Africa Post-Graduate Study in southern African political and economic affairs Baylor University, Waco, Texas Master of International Journalism University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa Bachelor of Arts in Journalism Ci>ic and Volunteer Activities Co-founder, Saga Hill Preservation Society Candidate, Board of Directors, West Metro Chap*.*r, Minnesota Land Trust Board of Directors, Hearing Dog Program of Minnesota Past board member, Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Foundation Past national board member. Little Brothers. Friends of the Elderly Founding board officer. Minneapolis Affiliate, Little Brothers, Friends of the Elderly Communications advisor. People of Phillips (neighborhood organization) Co-founder, Healing Gardens Tour, Center for Victims of Torture Committee member. Perennial Plant Association Volunteer, DECA Volunteer, Habitat for Humanity Past committee member. American Refugee Committee Past committee member, Minneapolis Chapter, American Red Cross Reasons for appUcation to ser>e on the Orono Parks Commission I would welcome the opportunity to serve on the Orono Parks Commission. I have had a lifelong interest in nature, wildlife and the environment, yet respect the challenges faced by Orono as a developing community. The Parks Commission plays an important advisory role in helping the City Council balance the pressures of development and preservation. The City’s 1994 recreational study clearly showed that residents have a passion for outdoor activities. It w'ould be a privilege to help facilitate access and use of Orono's parks and recreation areas - some ot the City’s least recognized assets. As a professional communicator I could perhaps help raise public awareness of Orono's existing outdoor resources and generate support for any new parks. I have held a number of volunteer positions over the years. None has excited me as much as the prospect of serving on the Orono Parks Commission. It would be a great privilege and a rare opportunity. Mv view on the role of the Parks Commission To serve the citizens of Orono To enhance the ability of the City Council to govern, by gathering information and making recommendations To support City policies and, upon request, to develop new ones To work closely with staff in administering City policies To listen to and solicit input from Orono residents To interact with parks authorities on the municipal, county, state and federal levels, whose policies impact the City of Orono fO 0\ , - V ■'/>*" - t-, > U^EkB' CITY of ORON Munldpai CfSc« Post OfRc« Bo* 66 Crvsui Bav, Mlnntsoa ££313-0066 ^ TXLEPHONE-»rJ.T257 • E\X-47^0510 Ot APPLICATION rCR CITI Conunission Applying ror. I2SM ADVISORY COiMMISSltlW^ 1 ^ 1^95 rks Cotsnission _ \ ►-t• t» I • 'L'^ Par3 □ corx'aunity Task Force (Name) Planning "Commission Name ;,^aress Tim \ J^^TT H ^ PpP T --------------- post Office s 2iP code ^ ------bA^i=!------SS3A4 Telephone (H) i^-^ \ ■ (w) e^T. Resident of Orono years Work Erperience: CS./LOi4>i-rt?,c.^r A/tiC O nn-T >A.g./«jur _ g) tc IVIPUO^P__^ Education \ Ji^iU\V/L*>t-ry OF KJ I<~|5*J,. i;>—-rtift-fi- —*^*"*^-—iw iv A. J\,„r.K..Q-roKl— civic and Volunteer Activities (past and pMsent) ,i-X-£P , , A , - (V..^. A ( yoi^fejUXTl-'- Vl.,.-n-V^^ tXuWiAM Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on the Planning Commission: I have lived in Orono for eight years. During that time I have seen many changes such as the relocation of city hall and the completion of highway 394. Since its completion there has been increased pressure to develop the few remaining open spaces we have left in Orono. Any future developments subdivisions, lakeshore residences, commercial properties, road improvements and expansions) should be carefully evaluated to protect and preserve the community as we know it. ^ As a Landscape Architect with a background in planning and architectxiral design, I believe I have the knowledge and skills necessary to assist the Commission in carrying forth its functions. What is your view of the role of the Commission: It is the role of the Planning Commission to carefully and impartially review and evaluate all matters which warrant its consideration. Specifically, the Commission should insure that each proposal complies with various city ordinances, policies, and guidelines. It serves as a vital link between the citizenry and the Council, and as such, must ins\ire that the items brought before it receive a competent and thorough review. I understand that this appointment may be discussed at a public 57/2- Date PARK CO>LMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Criteria Excellent Fair Poor Interest in serving on the Park Commission Related Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience 1 Familiarity with the following items; a. The Park Plan section of the City’s Community Management Plan b. The City’s Park Dedication ordinance c. The City’s bike/hike trail plan d. The City’s current park facilities Support of current Programs/Policies and Philosophy of City 1 Perspective on Council/Park Commission responsibilities aiKl relationship Perspective on key park issues facing the City in 1995 and beyond • • PARK CO.VLMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Criteria Excellent Fair Poor Interest in serving on the Park Commission Related Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience Familiarity with the following items: a. The Park Plan section of the City ’s Community Management Plan b. The City ’s Park Dedication ordinance c. The City ’s bike/hike trail plan d. The City ’s current park facilities Support of current Programs/Policies and Philosophy ot City 1 Perspective on Council/Park Commission 1 responsibilities and relationship Perspective on key park issues facing the City in 1995 and beyond 3 r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 22, 199$.^^Q ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Item Description: Interview Planning Commission Applicants Administrator Reviewed: ///; Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report A„.chn.e„.s: .. ,5 copies, The following times have been assigned to the applicants: 7:40 p.m. 7:45 p.m. 7:50 p.m. Elizabeth Wright Elizabeth Hawn Richard McFarland 7:55 p.m. Kevin Dulin 8:00 p.m. Milton Bix (Mr. Bix will be coming from another commitment and stated he would arrive by 8:00 p.m.) The attached sheets of interview questions are for Council’s use during the interview process. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:i i .• » <1 . ll‘ z ^//^• r ' •». _ ^ 0- :: : •^x•^^'Vvi.'cT:>' CITY of ORON Mvinidpal CfS<M Post Cf^ce Box 66^ QysulBa? ML-uicsoca £^'13-0066 ■m-IFHONE - 473-^57 • E4X • 47M«0 KP?- application tor citiien advisori commissions Coir.T4ission Applying For: Name Parks Commission Con.T.U7iity Task Force (Name) ------------- WFv6?yyT Planning Commission Address TeiA Post Office & Zip Code — Telephone (H)oavJMSi (M) Resident of Orono years WorJc Experience: r^\\V (r. m I- , mtt- irr ^\rP^ . •reasons for wanting to_ serve on this Copies ion- Please state ^ Vossibie. Dse additional sheet if (Please be as specific as p D0cess3ry -) D ^—— -Tivt^. ^Qy/)^0\-nAt>." fgcMjr of the role of the Commission? to include any further Information you o^n^ent %u are seeking. You may you feel is relevant would like the Council to.ISO, litalho^er materials you would consid0ir • Tim irru'T'^nY- w ur^ IV ^,1 w*M ^prlU flip n.\/iiy:iv/go-XW0dJ>yAttorjUL A^ ut?,iroafefgs ©S £f ^n'aS-^^s^t^d this appointment may be meeting Dat DESIGNS 4010 W. 65th Sfreet, Sutte 217 Edina, MN 55435 612-925-5529 OP EOINA. LTD Robait J. Davis, AIA Archttact April 20. 1995 City Of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323*0066 Re;Recommendation for Appointment to The Orono Planning Commission Dear Sir or Madam: I am pleased to recommend Elizabeth Wright for an appointment with the trust that we have acknowledged her as suited for this position of responsibility in your community. She would make an enrching addition by sharing her enthusiasm and organizational skills with the Planning Commission. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely. . • n • f M /. \» ^ o\o .V .'. MunidcaJ CCc« Post Ofllc* Bo* 6o Crvrji Bar. Mian*M “ _ telephone - 473-73S7 • E\X • 473-0510'U r!i % oV/ t'T'”T2E'l i^DVlSOR? COMMISSIONS application rOR Clalx^hN au^x r. - ’- C7.C>’^0 V ■ • * ** Consnission Applyinc loi. Par*<3 Ccniniission ]X Planning Coitcnission Conrr.unity Task Force (Name) Naae Address Post office & Zip Code Telephone (H) '^07L (W) W less 77f/i^ Resident of Orono ^^^^yeers Work Experience Education f^^vnii^fc-rTV yp iVrSilh'j'VTA ^ I 1^1 )"7L Civic and volunteer activities (past and present) ' 5yWc jd^iiuisj^cgU/ ^Vr/yiA^ ■ ' '«*JS jf*/ C.^^»Kl^AJrTy ssihss:cc5,'i:^0,^ 04/KI39-cc/yj/min^ Sc^i^L oc^-Ol)7^c^/P ffr^/7bt:^r - PhtoT c^mnrfGa^ /mn^eiE' rVlXATWJ f\a^Jr^i/ fVVHO/l Ccu^&<s:, ^ d. t/Sm f1 wanting to serve on this Commission ■ Please state your possible! Ose additional sheet if (Please be as specific a v necessary.) ' J J ^ y ^ /s/V yy‘'^ / y^/'/ (dr 'A/ /Vf/y!AytA) ,,/ 7^ ^yjy,.JY,y yyfYrM z J • ^ 4-he role of the Commission?What is your view of the roie ^ ^ Other Comments; Council ”to consider, information you you are seeking. ®fJ you feel is J^Aorials^ Yoa would like the Council toalso attach other material y consider.) I understand this appointment may be meeting. discussed at a public _ i RONO Muftidsai CScfi* P«CSI«3ox« C-vr^ Bar. TpT yfHONE - 473»t:5T • EVX..JMIAS 1 5 1995 c cxTi:s:i aovisoRT cowissions Corctission A=?ly’-^? T —^ssionI Par.<3 -^ Planning Coinaission Macs ;'"■ack Peres (ilarns)CoeLT.unity -asr. *"J X A '■ g J J <* —'____Address post Office s Zip c=<se 42^ &'8'/S7 /f'-rriTr, Telephon®(H) ^ (W)‘?4<g-45S9_ Resident of Orono veacs ,„.c 30. voxuooeeo .«i,it- Kdx>. necessary.) ^ ^% V f « • 'A'^in, What is your view of the role ^„,y, .<JO Cotninission? ^ ^ti^u <7^<flk 4 T nd6 30Y f mrtli®^ other comments: Council ” to ?ou''mS consider.)la X wftw -^ - # .J/f^.''r cftt^ ’KfT^ au^ I understand neetiog . this appointment may be discussed at a public riHi 15 '95 clfL'-I'!' Ml: €>^FvL Ir. Mt("■. j. »r /b Ol ^ --U ,..- i 'V%‘* A- Vi '-'V/ W NV V CITY of ORONO MwJu^Mi OflTwtf TmCX.ta>^i< C/~!t», 8«r, tzni^-a TUi?KC>'s - • ro: rv*’i AP»»;irATION FO? CITI-ity AUVXS0ii2 CO.MHISSIOKS • •CcrrjT;issicn Apj-yi*^'* I [ Psrks Corrr.iGSion 1 I Ccrrr.anity "Task tcxT* 'KASaJ Kelts 'IT' lX.*i.TisJ Planninij Cjamiisslon AdsTots nS<’ CQvrct->TA '’.mrr Post Office « rip CdP m9i Telephone (K) '/?(~(W)jcgo Rasideae ef Oronc -X years Work Experience: Educ^tioo o*J f^?(o /Vi Civic dud VoluotMwr ActilvitldM (past: dcd pi^drs^^at;) S#^ _____ - - •« may 15 '95 O'BJilPM yOPlhI’" nirff€‘^'XIr• your reasons for wanting to ««tv« cn this Co^aission ^Pleas* be aa specific aa poaaible. n»e addition?.! shaet if neccteary.J i-'n.-’— ?C?^ 1^1- tcV.,o( _ 7y^W»ii«. fa _jrar>>,f Vft’ H« r.U/ </ft ___ , ,ir / V.CuV-it W __kitiij.0k» O t # 04031.^ ^1 . 7 -C^e Ifv) Oi^g«vO> ^TvxV'WQtfi; __ •^ W m.e Rw<tOij/t-.W 0f,>.w»>.»A..v^ . (U/nV.Vy <k.<# p/o^..^Aj •tfc (V>,w..»..^>\.'c;. n*>'* V> 1^'^* <'»_V ****'_9^ <v rv^o^^^^^f cvjf) f>.ix..<o>ly bw 4*- ^^1 i. 4a a_ a o ^ C? Hbat Vo. 0>^(^ ro-ni.non.iy ^^^■■^^ S. U'»- X OdOvV>.«.«*-\ .-<- r> OB' <VUWj9 t is your view of the role of tbw gomiaaion? |Xs..-.U^ *fo -gvcslAJi. ^ /ao.vk-»^/ piCiK) _i^ _ ^*>**Uf^*'^ o^ 0<OA/ff '^ro^.^m. e^ ^ ^<l\Vn.<wW piav>ni> 'p*ZC^^ _!^^_*JSLLCi.‘*'^''''*'^ Qwvct ^^wq4‘ p/*3-4«rV' „ o». Cy,/- c»-w>< vnT^^ Other ComiaeDts: (tJaw fchia apwcM to Include any further inforvatioo yon would like the City CeuneiX to cenaider* or. that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are eeekinn. Tou pay alto attach other materials yon would like the Counoil to consider.) r^r?rry\r.-»V.n tY:v iW o^^sAv■Ctf^> - -- ------ -------------------------J" - '■ - - 1 fLiW, AV a vT‘*^«rw .> V • — h U<iVo \mw.A.« Wr^Vc. ---------- • — t/vT 1 ^ or A Q!>01» P» $ ron,i»(jJ?A. -fi oc- •». / nw^e^.4 trVhk^v^ w C*|\J»f r j \j J > • •• • I unc|c<^3tand this appointsieat be discussed at a public meeting-y jer" Dste MmY • e * •ic 03:I£FM YCFlAIT r-’I'-irC-F'XI:• K£VI\ I. Dl l IN rS5 C0N<.01U)iAST. W.UZAIA, MN 5.W1 fcJ.’ 471 9250 OBJtCUVE Om^ral Ma;i:ii'cr •» Chief Operan.-K: Oilitcr flu 4 itivisjoa of a Kirtunc 500 c m tpinv or a pr.votdv held CMiip.^ny Conjunie? locdb indii'Hv BACKGROl NH SIAL'IARV Ui\-.'rjincd ex^Krrience b -alc3, purcliaoi..^, eoginecriiis, product dcxcl..,uuem and eperaoons lor beth large an.l smaller food tinna. C-xcrllnK, vustaineJ carcvT grovuli a wide rang* cl and t\ct inciMMiijc responsIbiliMc; xnd iUiicrior results employment ms i ory YOPI.AIT, IISA, INC. Mpli , Mn 1092-Present vf gbufasfir.tf end CuatiA f 0p*ratio>j^ Responsible for all Controci Marufaciuring iocaimro producing dairy pnidm ii for Yoplait, KcsponsibiiinVs include contrcct ncgotiafiix^, management and to>is inventory manogemenr and product qualits Manage ar.l ciHirdmate Voplait enginccrin£ Nippon for Uic Lontract luc^onns Created the Contract . I^mdacturbg Department A k Vopiai*. Oversee the tnar.uuitiunng of nearJyla.O MM lvivps of protloct, repr«ssenting S30.0 MVt Resporitiblc hir dl Yupl-ir rau maienaJ and packagImm nM.triali p’jrckasmg Total purchases exceeded SI65.0 MM. Accounutdc Ibr matciial . osu iiipnnst budget. Rcspoasible fur the procurement acti *iiies of the two Yoplait pnuhic tion lacilices and ail Comtact frailties. Manage purchflsi.jij staff in Mpls, and at Yuplair facllitlea. iyaicm. Kcuutiated overS^.O MM in cost savuii^N wuhm the hzx tiscal \ru F. J b MPY 15 '95 03:£ZPil VQP l^IT Mir^rCiFCLlZ-P . F. K Reiurnc of Kevin f. DuJiii Page ra o EMPLOVML.NT IrLSTOR^• (comlnueU) GE.\LK.\L MILLS.. INC.. Mp’s.. .Ma i^Lot.cn 4.10 s.,vi up. procuccon results, piOvJiKiion costs, procuction nnd invenrorv ;enonino com^-r^‘ ^ coordinated efforts cf Genet J \fi 11 ^ ^ . w or supi. uJ Direcuc miceratioii ufeitniractor reporting sj’sicms svit Ii Ocrufal MiHa prcducHn.1 n-„,ibi:Uv «SKsncm tor Pvcsea. J, .rd ‘ ‘ f. FRIEDMAN A.ND SO.NS, IN'C m Pln'i'»«!rlphia. Pa 1985-1988 Natioaai Sales Manager for S-IO ONfM Retsil a.xJ Indusiria] fruit ^rnfaunrer Adranistered all sales ac.iivmes includinij bud«eticg. tbicc^simg. maitei as.«t m,-u4 product concept dcvelopmer.i Trade promotional and rra.kHiug pLs and sales u^eiilne prograrr.s. Creoted program. ,o irack veraus budget, sales iriS L P n.oUunaI recap analysis. .NJauages m house sales staff and Retail hnlrr nemerk. general mills. INC.. .Mills . .\!n 1 982 1 985 Staff respHSflsible for new product elopment. Responsible for rlic development of newproduu umcepu! from concett inceoticin nJoMi introduction. Di.ericd start up teams di^g thT GEiNER,\L .MILLS. INC., Mpli.. Mn 1982-1985 P^ZeZ"'^^nc““ “'I of t^;Y 15 '95 OiJcrPf r'!'*^LwIT Mir^Cty^'CiLlS* M)P. 6- b Rr'sitmp of Ke\in T. D jlin Pa-^e 5 EMPLO^IMEM Hlb IURV fcoot) UPPER LAKES FOODS. INT.. n.Hiuri N(n l076-l0Stu Focd .Semcj S&lci Rf Mcsg:it Jivc Ri>$pcniible for e$tabli£hin^ new ficcounts and di^trilMiij(.u! tm:torie; tor L'ppcr Nlidwcc FimhI S«.T\tce Disinbution Corr.pcnv. Asscwcd new teiilioTv narivct potcnlal xcluiiiint m/ijor competitor peoetraticn. required dijtributior rxtwoiV. Ley accounts tind overall m1.*v ^vtcntial. Estabiished two new temtories t>vo hiunlred w'rornr’i and Si.U.MM in new salci. Acci'imianle for customer service, prolit'lcrs. sales vnl’ime .^jiJ ecu jettons. rni CATION IJniveivii) of Minne.«ota. .Mpir.., .Mn R S Chemical Engineennj; Njj2 University of Minnesota. Duluth. Mn Biology 1976 AFFILIAUUNS USA Hockdv Association MinneviM District Five Coach in Chic! Orono Hockey .Association Cu.iuhes Board Chairman Orono hccccr .Association Ct.iach Member. .Araericc'.; Imtitu'e of Chemical Enqinceis •T« ^ ! ./ ■ I.o A .X.^.II« ».l 'f‘. ;!■•>.*,>' A'' Municipal OfSGS Post OfBet Box 66 CfTital Bar. MimicM 5S323-0066 ^ TELEPHONE - 47J.T357 • E\X - 4734510 APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Coiranission Applying For: I Parks Commission Planning Commission ~~1 Community Task Force (Name) Name Milton H. Bix Address ?Am Woodhaven Drive. Post Office & Zip Code Orono 55356-9477 Telephone (H)476-9697 (W)!^33-8225 » i Resident of Orono years Work Experience: Anomev 32 years City Councilman. Golden Valiev,_1971-197^ Board of Estimate-Taxation. Minneapolis. 1968-1970 (Bpar^ Commission Education: University of Minnesota. Bachelor of Science—1958. Wm Mitchell College of Law. LLB and JD 1963 Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): Volunteer. AhH>otT Northwestern Hospital: numberous boards during, past 20 yeays; h4?9haJL horkev. football coach. Golden Valiev: lecturer on Mental Illness and the Civil l^w, Miiyi. IffSL Education- T.ecturer. Psychology Dent.. Carlton College; Univ. of Minn. 3and A|umm Assn ■ Minnesota Mental Henlth Assn and hoard member nQ80-88); Purl Oaks Golf ritih hoard member Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission (Please be as sp<.-cinc as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) Mv nas. exnerienre and educaiior----T'^hfy me as a member of a City Commissiom.1 0 n..in.ain in.enriiv pf Ornno ns a communilv of single family-low jensity residences; (P rttainjaia ,nH open sn.ee woodlands. we.i-^nHs- to halt abuse of our hiUlway apd ffanypPPatjon inm resideniial areas: 10 Provi-te for lone range planning that ^ sitccesyfijl What is your view of the role of the Commission? p,„nn.e nf Commission is self staled - to plan and control ftilvre ijevel«?pn|fnt; IQ rejinbl ilOT that encroaches upon residential nrifbborhoods; fo wprk with oilier CPIumlSSiqiM m insure a muniripalitv that cares ahowt it? citaens Iheif propeitY villtfW anil their future. Other Comments: (Use this space to include any further information you would like the C^ CcLcil to consider, or that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are seekmg. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) Age 59 2 Children - Matt - Civil Fnpineer and Registered Surveyor. Green Bay. W1 - married to Mama - Sof^ial Worker - Human Resources. Minneapolis married to Ga.pL--------- Mv most important Quality is that I am semi-rttiredX / stand,appointm^t may be discussed at a public meeting. Signamre Date PLANNING CO^LMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS 1 Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Interest in serving on the Planning Commission 1 Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience 1 Familiarity with the following items: 1 a. The City’s Community Management Plan b. The City’s rural development philosophy c. Lake use and management and lakeshore development d. Long term street and transportation planning e. Highway 12 • Support of current Programs/t>S^{« and I^ilosophy of City Perspective on Council/Planning ’ »umission responsibilities and relationship .............. Penpective on Key land use planning issues facing the City in 1993 and beyond 1 Perspective on ways to develop or retain good 1 Planning Commission/applicant/staff relations PLANNLNG CO.NEVOSSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Interest in serving on the Planning Commission Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience Familiarity with the following items; a. The City ’s Community Management Plan b. The City ’s rural development philosophy c. Lake use and management and lakeshore development d. Long term street and transportation planning e. Highway 12 • Support of current Programs/Policies and I^ilosophy of City Perspective on Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship Penpeaive on Key land use planning issues facing the City in 199S and beyond Perspeaive on ways to develop or retain good Planning Commission/applicant/staff relations PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Criteria Excdlent Good Fair Poor Interest in serv ing on the Planning Commission Knowledge, skills, abilities, and CApenence Familiarity with the following items: a. The City’s Community Management Plan b. The City’s rural development philosophy c. Lake use and management and lakeshore development d. Long term street and transportation planning e. Highway 12 • Su{^rt of current Proi,ramsyPolicies and Riilosophy of City Perspective on Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship 1 Perspective on Key land use planning issues 1 facing the City in 1995 and beyond Perspective on ways to develop or retain good Planning Commission/applicant/staff relations ________1 PLANNING COXLMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QLTSTIONS B Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor 1 1 Interest in serv'ing on the Planning Commission 1 Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience - 1 Familiarity with the following items: 1 a. The City’s Community Management Plan 1 b. The City’s rural development philosophy n c. Lake use and management and lakeshore development d. Long term street and transportation planning e. Highway 12 • ; Support of current Programs/Policies and Riilosophy of City Perspective on Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship Perspective on Key land use planning issues facing the City in 1995 and beyond Perspective on ways to develop or retain good Plaiuiing Commission/applicant/staff relations PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Criteria Interest in serving on the Planning Commission Kno^vledge, skills, abilities, and experience Familianty with the following items: a. The City’s Community Management Plan b. The City’s rural development philosophy c. Lake use and management and lakeshore development d. Long term street and transportation planning e. Highway 12 Support of current Programs/Policies and Philosophy of City [Perspective on Council/Planning Commission responsibilities and relationship Perspective on Key land use platming issues facing the City in 1995 and beyond Perspective on ways to develop or retain good Planning Commission/applicant/staff relations Excellent Good Fair Poor ( ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE II. 1995 cc JUN 2 6JUN CITY Of WONQ ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, Jr., Council Members J Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley, and JoEllen Hurr, who arrived at 8 10 p.m Representing Start' were Acting City Administrator John Gerhardson, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m (•#1) CONSENT AGENDA Items #5, 6. 7, 8, 9. 12. 13, 14, and 16 were added to the Consent Agenda. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#2) INTERVIEW PARK COMMISSION APPLICANTS The Council interviewed the following candidates for the one position open witWn the Park Commission. It was noted to aU candidates that further interviewing will be conducted at the next Council meeting, and they will be notified of the filling of the opening after the interviews have been completed. Gerhardson noted that an applicant who had applied to the Planning Commission had asked to change his request to the Park Commission. This applicant will be interviewed along with one other at the next Council meeting. Each candidate was asked why they applied for the position, what contributions or changes they would bring to the commission, whether they were aware of the comprehensive management plan and the philosophy of the present commission, whet er they had attended any Park Commission meetings, and whether they had the time to commit to such a position. The interviewees responses are as follows. ROBERT W. LANGGUTH Robert Langguth lives in the Chevy Chase area of Orono, has an engineering background, and has served on the Wayzata Police Rescues. Lang^th said he has the time to get involved on the Park Commission as he is retired. In noting the urban expansion to the western suburbs, Langguth said it is important to obtain all land available now for future parks. He has not attended any park meetings. MINIATES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CI'H’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (^2 - Park Commission Inter\iev s - Robert Lancguth - Continued) Kelley inquired if he was familiar with the philosophy of Orono and its parks and maintenance. Langguth said he has spoken with Gerhardson about the parks He said he was happy with the present park system but not familiar with the individual parks but saw the need to expand. Jabbour asked tor his opinion on what the functions ot parks should be, i e. active, passive, wildlife preserves Langguth voiced a need for aaive parks with festivities held at the parks Jabbour suggested Langguth read the City's management plan tor his mtbrmation. ANDREW RONNLNGEN Ronningen said he has lived in Orono for two v'ears and plans on living here the rest of his life. He would like to make an investment into the City and saw the Park Commission as a good way to begin. His contnbutions have been a career, overseas job. raising a family He has read the comprehensive plan and felt the current state of the City was good. Ronningen said he has lived in Minneapolis, St Louis Park, and Alaska and has seen what works and does not work. He said the level of quantity and quality of Orono parks IS good and would like to maintain that and add a long term vision His background at St 1 homas was noted. Callahan asked what prompted him to apply for the position and whether he had any specific ideas. Ronningen said a pe^n accumulates wealth but needs to leave their children with a good environment and building a strong park system is one way to accomplish this. Kelley asked about the Casco Point area where Ronningen lives and what his ideas would be for that area. Ronningen said the park on CoRd 15 serves alot of young kids and has a good ice link. The park on the other end, consisting of 8 acres, was kept was natural. He said he is working to develop a Casco Point homeowners association. He thought a 6rst event would be to hold a ^ picnic at the park to make use of it wth walking dogs and kids running and would not want it further developed. Jabbour asked Ronningen if he had enough time with his job responsibilities to fulfill the Park Commission obligations. Jabbour noted the many hours involved, and the meetings with other agencies beyond the one monthly meeting of the commission. Ronningen said he wants to do it wholeheartedly and was not involved in alot of e.Mracurricular activities. MAMIE JIN Jin said she has lived in Orono a t ouple of years and likes to participate in her community. Jin was on the park and recreation board for Maple Grove and fairuliar with parks though the two are structured differently. Jin said Maple Grove was in the process of updating their compre*'Ciisive plan and was not coming into this totally cold. Callahan asked if she has read the Orono comprehensive plan or sat in on any meetings. Jin had not. Kelley asked why she moved to Orono. Jin said that Maple Grove was expanding rapidly, and she preferred more green areas, liked the climate of the City, and noted she had grown up in the western suburbs. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (U2 - Park Commission Interviews - Mamie Jin - Continued) Kelley asked about the two cities’ differences. Jin said Maple Grove’s parks were geared to tiny tot lots with a lot of small parks nearby with more apparatus there. Jin said Orono’s parks were more natural She lives in the Casco Point area and is involved in starting the homeowners association Goetten asked about any specific goals she might have Jin said she liked a natural environment and liked what the Park Commission has done She believed in checking plans and looking into the wants of the residents She is open to new development but feels it is important to preserve land. Jin had not heard of the Saga Hill area. She feels she has the time to commit, noting she is on another board that meets during the working day, and her evenings were open. Tm «ud her family was used to planning around commitments. Jabbour commented on the recent park tour, comprehensive plan, and the park survey. JANELLE PETERSON Peterson said she has lived in Orono for 11 years, 1/2 mile from Wolsfeld Woods, and has used the Luce Line and Bederwood Park. She would like to sec land preserved for her children and those that follow. Callahan asked about her view with development noting her position with a builder. Petersen said her work with a developer has made her aware of the preciousness of parks. She said some cities have overbuilt and would like to sec that parks and wetlands in Orono don’t disappear She did not have any specific plans for the position but would like to continue to maintain the parks and acquire new park land Peterson has not attended any meetings or seen the park survey. She has read the comprehensive plan. Jabbour asked what she felt was the function of the parks Peterson said there needed to be a balance between recreational parks for the eiqoyment of all and the provision of wetlands She noted that tax dollars come into play and saw no problem with paying more to go towards future parks. RICHARD P. MEYERS Callahan asked Meyers why he had applied for the position and what goals he would have Meyers said he has an urban planning degree and parks were his avocatioa His job is in law enforcement. He noted his work with the Cedar Lake renewal project's bike trail and his service as chair of the citizens advisory committe for the Minndiaha State Park renovation, which was a 10 year, 10 million dollar plan. Meyers said he is intiiMtely familiar with Orono through his work with the water patrol. He would like to see bike trails developed and sees this as a nice legacy to leave behind, noting this knows no politics, and balances his life. Meyers secs Orono as a place with an abundance of swamps, prairies, wetlands, gardens, and water. He would like to see more interpretations on natural areas. He noted wdiile walking around French Creek that it was difficult to get all the way around and feh it should be more accessible to the handicapped, and cited this park as an example for interpretation for people to learn about nature. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#2 - Park Commission Interviews - Richard Meyers - Continued) Meyers said that biking is the number one recreation sport and noted the lack of bike racks in the City. He would like to see the parks tic in with bike trails. He noted the la^ of picnicking areas and trash receptacles along the shore on Lake Minnetonka. He noted the good job with the bathroom faciUties and trash at Coffey Cove in Spnng ParL Jabbour said this was done by the DNR. Meyers felt the lake was overused and thought areas should be closed otfto allow vegetation to regrow. He teh fishing piers were good. He thought the City should locate spots and concentrate park efforts instead ot spreading out Meyers saw the need to contain garbage and lack of garbage cans, but noted the cost involved to pick up the garbage. He thought the adopt-a-park progr^ was good and noted a Minneapolis plan called "people-for-parks", which emphasized donations. Meyers thought this would be good for such things as fishing piers, a way to leave a remembrance, and a way to gain private funding He said people are walling to give as they love their parks, and the City needs to tap into this. Meyers said he saw and reviewed the park survey. Jabbour said that ideas mentioned by Meyers were being done within the City now, noting Norenberg Park, and the bike path. Jabbour commented that 2^% of the citizens responded to the park survey and 80-90% feh open space was the number one priority. Jabbour said neighbors do take care of the bike trails but were not organized. Meyers said he thought it was good to have the bike trail. He noted a sign for a trail on CoRd 19 was too small He thought it was good for the neighborhoods and people would use the trails. With the lack of parking space, Meyers reiterated the thought that bike racks would help. Callahan asked about his work with the water patrol. Meyers said he has been on the water patrol for five years and was very aggressive with the boating-while-intoxicated law. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#3) REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 22,1995 Goetten moved, KeUey seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 22, 1995. Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMIVUSSION COMMENTS Park Commission Chair Richard Flint had no comments at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Chair Steve Peterson had no comments. Commissioners Dale Lindquist and Candace Rowlette were also present. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITA' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mimi Ryerse, who lives on Old Crystal Bay Road, asked the Council to consider revising the Noise Ordinance. Ryerse said that the noise from moto-crossing, with no mufflers being used, has affected her neighborhood. She has contacted the police department on several occasions and was told that they are unable to assist in alleviating this problem as the ordinance is vague. Kellev commented that he was aware of the problem, as he also lives in the same area, and ^ggested to Ryerse that she voice the noise complaint before the Council. The people who are moto-crossing are riding on their own property. Callahan asked Gerhardson to check into this problem as weU as the ordinance itsell and report back to Council ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#4) ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ADULT SHELTER Callahan said the issue at the meeting was to decide whether to amend the code and/or the zoning ordinance regarding the use of church property in Navarre. This matter is driven by the interest in the property by the Westonka Intervention Project but was not specific to whether Westonka ’s application would be approved. Their application would need approval under specific conditions under either a zoning or code change. C Jlahan also said the financial stability of the organization is not germane to the discussion. The issue was brought before the Planning Commission and Council as a result of the application required to operate a shelter in October of 1994. The current codes do not permit a domestic shelter in Orono at this time in any zone. The question being is whether or not to make a change to the zoning code to allow this use. Callahan said the Council referrred the shelter issue to the Planning Commission, as it is a land planning matter. The Planning Commission held public hearings, work sessions, and public information meetings. Information was gather^ and detailed from contact with police, professionals, and other shelter groups. As a result, two ordinances were drafted, one for a residential zone amendment, and for a commercial zone amendment. The Planning Commission recommended an ordinance amendment for the residential zone with a conditional use permit or a conditional use permit under the B-4 commercial zoning. This zone includes nursing homes, retirernem homes with CUP, and professional office building use. At this time, a zoning change would be required. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTIY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Steve Peterson, Chair of the Planning Commission, explained the investigation and recommendations made as a result of many meetings The skeptical beginning questioned the need for such a shelter Information, positive and negative, wa« gathered from police departments, a Hennepin County'judge, and other sources The public was shown to be both for and acainst the shelter, for both residential and commercial zoning with a shelter, and for commercial zoning change only. Peterson reported the Planning Commission telt strongly that the zoning should remain residential with a conditional use permit used as the vehicle for shelter approval The public did not seem concerned about the zoning issue itself Peterson felt a need for such a shelter was established. PetciMu, past-Chair Charles Schroeder, and other members of the Commission felt they went beyond the normal measures in scrutinizing the issues involved. The public was notified by newspaper and mail and were involved in the information gathered process Callahan noted that all members of the Planning Commission ga\e the issue careful consideration. Callahan opened the meeting to public comment. Kent Carlson, 3498 North Shore Drive, asked about the need for a shelter as spoken by Peterson. Carlson said the word, need, is a powerful word and questioned how strong the need was in Orono. Callahan said it was difficult to answer this numerically. The question of whether a large number of women in Orono are trying to get into shelters does not exist, but there are women in Orono who are in need of a sheher. Callahan said the shelter would be for those in the Lake Minnetonka area and to the west. Melody Versailles, 3472 Livingston, asked how children from St. Boniftcius would get to school if at the shelter for a long time. Versailles wondered if an abuser knows where the victim is, will they approach the shelter residents in front of the homes and businesses of Orono, and at the parks. She said we caioot afford for this to happen. Versailles did not want our chidiren exposed to such incideiKes. Versailles also wondered if a liason would be on the shelter board to work with if such incidents occurred. If the shelter was under Hennepin County contract, Versailles asked how often they would be reviewed, and questioned whether this would be good for the community. Val Hessburg said what would be done with the children was a choice of the mother. As far as the perpetrator was concerned, these incidents just do not occur. Reseai ch has shown that the shelter is not where the perpetrators go. The sheher is vciy secured and police would be called if an event of this sort would occur. Versailles said she was not concerned with the shelter itself but in areas like our parks. Hessburg reminded the public that the perpetrator was not angry at their children. Versailles responded that she did not want children exposed to this situation. li. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITS’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12. 1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Peterson said safety was a major issue addressed in the review process. Judge Davidson of Hennepin County informed the commission and statistics show that the shelter is the last place an abuser would ao iMost abusers are under court orders and are rcstriaed from going near the shelters Peterson said what we would think would happen just does not occur. The abusers would more likely go to friends and relatives iomes to approach the victim They would run into problems with the police at the shelters Robert .Albertson, 2100 Shad>^ ood Road, said he is a 32 year resident of Orono Albertson has a family member who is a ps>’chiatnst and heads up a shelter. That particular shelter is well run with counselors and security but sees problems for this new shelter. Albertson questioned how this operation would be run He felt the staff was not qualified and anyone needing a job could get one there Albertson did not think the Westonka people knew how to work with these people He fears this would be more of an open boarding house. John Anderson, 2195 Shadywood Road, sad he is against the shelter and says there is no r.eed for one in Orono Anderson said this would only bring e ther people to Orono. He said he never got a letter from Orono or he. rd an^^hing regarding the shelter. Anderson said there is a need for abuse shelters, citing the Simpson case, but questioned the need for this community Callahan said that 300 houseliolds in a certain radius around the proposed shelter site were notified by mail and would like to know if he had a problem with getting his mail. Anderson suggested conuaciing with individuals to temporarily help residents of Orono. Dr Bryant Powers, 3 701 Shoreline Drive, a psychiatrist in Navarre, said his last client of the day was an Orono resident. He is unable to disclose names but knows of tte need for the shelter He also works with offenders, suppt^. i ;hc need for a shelter in this area. Powers said viaims ask where a shelter is and fi> 1 ihey need to go into Minneapolis. T-his is a major deasion to break this cycle of v .vlence, and then they are asked further to go outside of their city of residence as well as away from their support syrtem. Powers said this causes them to feel like they are being punished. He felt more will use a shelter if one is located here than if they had to go into the city and make major changes. The issue of children in school is major. In Powers work with offenders, he says he has never had a case where a victim was stalked. The offenders are aware that the shelter is not where they can go. Callahan asked Powers about the issue of offenders approaching victims outside the shelter, for example, at a park. Powers said we need to know the dynamics of the problem These are people who have problems of dependency and control. The people are frustrated but not crazy; they need help. The spouse being battered is in need of support. The issue of stalking is being well handled by the criminal justice system, and the offender knows this. It has never been Powers' experience of children being snatched. This would occur • ore in a divorce situation. MESITTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCU MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Clair Rood, 2215 Kenwood Way, said the neighbors had a meeting with the Westonka Intervention people the night before He said they were good people who saw a need to help Rood said he felt no animosity towards them Rood said the neighborhood in question is full of children and elderly and is a vulnerable area The streets are narrow and children are playing The intersection is busy, especially with the closure of Old Beach Road. Rood reported that he did research on his own He visited the Sojourner Shelter in Nfinnetonka, which is similar to the propr shelter The shelter houses 12-16 and is located in a neighborhood close to businesses He said the neighbors he spoke with had never talked lO any member of either the Planning Commission or Council. Rood asked one couple, Mr & Mrs Harry Stifler for information on the shelter and whether they would recommend the shelter Rood said the Stiflers responded that they would not recommend a shelter in a residential area. The problem as they saw it was that strange cars come and go The Stifler's told Rood that a felon was arrested one block away and was from out of state Rood asked them if there were many shelter residents from Minnetonka or the surrounding areas. The Stifler’s said no adding that they felt 98Vo who used the shelter were black, as they had seen only two white residents in 10 years. Rood next visited Mr & Mrs. Jim Rooney. 17010 Karen Way. who said their 10 yw old daughter was beaten up on the bus two years ago by three blacks and needed medical attention. They said it was not disclosed to them when they moved into the neighborhood that a shelter was near by. The Rooney's have three daughters, ^es about 8-16, who said they know children from the shelter who have riden the school bus. It was their opinion that the children were good and were at the ahdter about a month at a time. Tlie Rooney’s said they have witnessed one occasion where the police were running through the neighborhood and have seen strange cars but no major problems. They did not know if the residents of the shelter were from Hopkins or Minnetonka area but said the sheher residents were about 90% black. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGUL.\R ORONO CIT\’ COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 {H4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Rood spoke with an employee of the shelter, who he said was young and pregnant Rood said he was invited in and saw residents cleaning up from dinner noting they were 1001 o black. The employee had Rood follow her to the office on the second floor The employee told Rood that the residents did the cooking and light cleaning, with professional cleaners working twice monthly Rood asked about the education requirements of the directors The employee told Rood that only a plulosophical educational was required. This meant in his opinion that they had previously been ^used Rood said he was told that the residents did not stay longer than a month and mMiy were from out of state Rood said the staff w as not paid very much and that there was no neighborhood involvement whalsoev'er. Rood said the employee stated she would not recommend the Navarre location tor a shelter The employee had asked Rood how he had found the shelter Rood said a neighbor had put a sign up in his yard showing the direction to the she’ier as he had people knocking on his door asking where the shelter was located. Rood then visited with Mr. & Mrs Carl Lynn. 11812 Karen Wav, who had been a board member of the shelter for three years She w as no longer on the board as it was felt to be non-productrve and time consuming Rood asked the Lytin’s if they had ever seen anyone who looked "beat up" They replied, they had not. He asked the couple where the shelter residents w ere from He was told that a friend of theirs, who works at Kathenne Curren School in Hopkins, said that half were from out of state, citing Indiana, Chicago, as well as North Minneapolis, and said 90-100% were black in color. Callahan asked Rood what he had gained in know 'edge from the interviews Rood said that the shelter was not used by residents of Minnetonka, but by people on welfare, and j a quicker step to getting on the welfare rolls Rood said we have been misled if we think the shelter would be used by the Lake Minnetonka a*^ea residents. Lyr" P ood added that the statistics of Sojourner Sheher show that the shelter was not ui,^ by people in the area Shiriey Brehm, 3908 Mapleton, Spring Park, said she was a victim of domestic abuse. Brehm was married for 30 years. 28 years of which were abusive. She has been divorced for 11 years and knows her ex-husband has not changed. Brehm said she took the effort to go into counseling and is a recovering alcoholic. She said she is a respected woman, and she knows alot of women who need a shelter here. She said it has been her desire to buy the church herself for this same use if she had the funds. Brehm is concerned for children who are trying to find their own identities Brehm said an ordinance is needed for a shelter as there is no where to go for help. She said families members have problems to deal with too and unable to help the victim. Brehm strongly urged the Council to find a location in our area for a shelter. MINITTS OF THF REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Don Shervcn, who lives on NavTirre Lane, said he has been a resident for 30 years, and his unclf built the Navarre area Sherven questioned whether the business people of Navarre were notified or asked their opinion of the shelter Peterson said the public was notified. Sherven said the people who live in the area have their lives on the bne and is concerned with the environment if the shelter were to come to pass. Dan Hessburg responded to the visit to the Sojourner Shelter by Clair Rood. He read a lener from Sue Aumer, who is Executiv e Director of Sojourner, which Aumer ^?ys corrects misinformation received by Rood when he visited the shelter. The letter is part of this packet. Val Hessburg said the model chosen for Westonka was not Sojourner but Alexander Lewis House. Investigations were conducted of 20 shelters Lewis House has two shelters, one in Eagan and one in Inver Grove Heights One shelter is in a R-4 multi housing zoning and the other in institutional zoning They house 25 and 15. These shelters are in touch with their neighborhoods and have received no complaints. The management of Westonka would come from this area. The Department ot Corrections set guidelines but policy would be set up by the board. Over 2^00 victims were served and over 3000 children by the Lewis House Shelters. Hessburg responded to why sate houses would not be an appropriate alternative. The victims are in need of more support than can be had at a safe house. They are also in need of a longer stay than three days There are programs within the shelter to assi« people. Victims staying in safe houses feel they are imposing as the owner is not paid; whereas in the shelter, staff is paid. The shelter is expected to expand to the greater Lake Minnetonka area Hessburg noted that areas further west, such as Carver County, have no shelters. Hessburg's opinion is that the beds will be filled. Sheri Block, 2305 Bayview Place, commented on the letter from Sojourner's Executive Director, Aumer Block specifically referred to the first paragraph on the second page, which addresses the issue of racism as well as other forms of hatred/violence, which Aumer says arc bound to arise as you shelter battered women and children. Block said she did not want racism, hatred, and violence to come to this area. She felt the victims should be placed out on farms and raise their own food if they didn't have the money, and V in bused back to where they came from. She thought people should get the help they needed but not in Navarre. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Tim Justice, 3114 Brooks Lane, Minnetonka Beach, said the neighborhood meeting on June 11 was spirited He said the Westonka Intervention group were good but were not all knowing He feels there will be an impact on the neighborhood Justice referred to the Mound'shelter application from 1994 From the Mound shelter application file. Justice said the need was not established He contacted 10 police departments, which handle 25 cities and towns in the western suburban area He was told there were 204 domestic abuse cases in the calendai year 1994 Justice then asked whomever he was speaking with whether shelter placements had taken place C’'e depannient had one referral, four departments had none, and 4 departments weren t aware of any but there could have been some placements. The 1993 Mound file showed one shelter retcrral. He did note that this was not the only avenue by which shelters were entered. Callahan said if a shelter was nearby, looking at statistics, the shelter w ould be used. Justice said an abuser goes to jail, and the victim is provided information by the officer or Westonka. Help is also sought from friends and family He believes the need exists, but for this community. Justice said shelter assistance was not the first remedy. Peterson said the Planning Commission had looked over the police calls. The Orono Police Department was asked if a shelter was within the community, would the police department use it The department replied that it would. At this time, referral cards arc given out. Police officers are undergoing sensitivity training to update themselves on this issue. Vouchers are also available and used to send victims to motels. Callahan said we arc trying to establish whether there is a need for the shelter; and if so, would it be used by west suburban people. Rick Hacfiier, 2324 Shadywood, says he lives next to the church and opposes the location for the shelter. He believes the victims should be housed out on a farm not in town. He said he takes care of a 16 year old, and if abuse occurs, it will affca lives and affect the community. Patti Herzog, 288.^ Halstead Lane, said she had visited four shelters. She checked into the police rwords going back seven years for any problems and reviewed the city minutes regarding Sojourner. She found that some of the neighbors were interested in supporting the shelter, while others were antagonistic. The planning commission of Minnetonka had spoken with neighbors and found no filed compl^nts. In checking the police activity in the neighborhood of Sojourner between 1987-1994, there w’as only one call of suspicious activity. Herzog spoke with Lisbeth Wolf of Womens Advocate Shelter in St. Paul, located in a busy neighborhood with alot of businesses, who caid there had been no police calls as a result of any perpetrators on the shelter propeify. Home Free in Plymouth showed no calls in 1994, 1 ;all in 1993, where it was thought a perpetrator was coming but no one did, and 2 calls in 1992. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Crn' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) presented &n excerpt from the City of Minnetonks stiff to the Plinning Commission and Council of Minnetonka, dated 5/16/95, saying they had rexiewed the proposal regarding welfare, health and safety considerations and for noise, access, police and fire protection, real estate value, compatibility to single family neighborhood, and found the shelter would not adversely affect the neighborhood or the community ’. It also went on to say that the Hopkins Project and Sojourner were compatible to their neighborhoods Planning Commissioner Candace Rowlette said the commission was initially concerned and apprehensive about a shelter coming into Orono. A lot ot lime was spent investigating the possibility The Planning Commission did not look for a shelter to fill the location The applicants came to the commission, and the City is now reacting to that application Rowlette noted that this is the first application she has seen in the six years she has been on the Planning Commission for this building. Rowlette cited the vandalism that has occurred to the building. Rowlette rnswered why this was a good location for a shelter. The women come to the shelter without transportation They need to have access to grocery stores and other needs. There are three school district buses. Mound, Orono, and Minnetonka, who serve this area. This would allow the children to attend their own schools In response to sending victims to a farm, Rowlette said this would be like s^ing an Orono resident to downtown Minneapolis. They would lose their support, which they need. Richard Meyers, 2195 Bayview Place, said he was concerned with the raw numbers. He feels after looking at the service calls, there are not enough people from the Orono area to serve. With three references last year, Meyers does not see the need to fill these beds. If the beds are filled on a first come, first serve basis, the people served will come from other areas. If the beds are then filled w ith people from other areas, there will be no ^ space available for Orono residents, and they will be sent to other areas. Meyers saic. the facts show the numbers are not there to support this shelter. Meyers said the shelter would have to adhere to state standards, and there would be no license. If a conditional use permit is given, he asked what the liability would be to the City. He also sees a problem with the management of Westonka, who he feels has no credentials. Meyers said he is concerned with violence. He noted that Judge Davidson is on the board of Westonka Intervention and also used Hennepin County stationery in writing about the shelter. He asked a legal question about whether this use would violate the comprehensive plan of the City regarding multi-dwellings and harming the charaaeristics of a neighborhood. MINLTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Meyers is worried about the people who would come to Or one as a result ot the shelter. He did not believe they would interact well with the people living here. He foresaw problems with school children and cultural clashing. Meyers said he heard the Orono police officer say he did not see the need for the shelter Meyers said he was offended by the way the Planning Commission dealt with the police officer. He felt women who are subjeaed to abuse should call the police often. The offenders should be jailed. Meyers said he did not wish to warehouse the victims. Meyers said he was also concerned with the safety of the people in the facility James Jacobson, 2328 Olive, a 13 year resident, lives across the street from the church. Jacobson said the urban policies state that no new development is to conftici or adversely affect the neighborhood characteristics He said he would not move into the area if the shelter had already been there. Lia Jakisiak, 2338 Olive, sees the church from her window. She is against the shelter. Jakisiak said she was a victim of abuse herself and has been stalked. Her offender tried to find her She said these men are not smart, as they are not smart enough to know not to batter women. She noted a higher percentage of alcoholism related to abuse. With Jimmy’s Bar and the liquor store nearby, this location would not be good. She questioned whether the children and women can leave the shelter, and if they would frequent the liquor establishments Jakisiak said this sheher would have caused her to feel alienated and feel like people were pointing their finger at her. She did go to a safie house and d’J not feel put out Jakisiak said her mother and mother-in-law’s homes have been safe houses, but they have never been contacted out in this area. She said the commuTity should be made aware of safe houses. She said she knows of many homes that would be available to help abuse victims. Jakisiak said this shelter is not the option for us. Albert Ginkcl, 3210 Navarre Lane, is a licensed real estate agent. He said the real estate term of "location, location, location" should indicate that the shelter should not be located here. He said he has not met one person who is for the shelter and feels the majority of people living in the area are t^nst it. Ginkel said the City should find another spot. Robin Anderson, 3324 Navarre Lane, said she interviewed Sjoumer’s Director, Aumer, this past Saturday. She chose this shelter as it resembles the geographic area of Navarre with the residential setting but near a business area. Aumer told Anderson that a residential area is fine but an institutional setting is better. Anderson said she was concerned with the visibility of the shelter in attracting abusers and becoming a neighborhood attraction. Aumer said, while it is nice to get away from the institutional feeling, it is quite public and requires more secirity. Anderson said we do not have this in Navarre. Anderson said she understood that there is only one police car available to patrol Navarre. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter • Continued) Anderson said with five liquor establishments within walking distance, if the abusiv'C relationship involves alcohol, the victim may also have alcohol problems The offender may come into the area with good intentions and begin drinking, lose their judgment, and cause problems Anderson feels we may be comparing apples to oranges with other shelters being more institutional-like and with more police to patrol the areas. Anderson said this was not the location for a shelter Callahan closed the public meeting and asked each Council Member for their feedback. Hurr said participation in the Planning Commission meetings had revealed a need as well as a need in the greater Minneapolis area. Hurr would prefer the zoning remain residential with the use of a conditional use permit. Conditions could tie in closely the proximity to buslines and services Hurr was concerned if the property was rezoned commercial, that some time in the tuture, the City could be looking at a 24-hour Holiday Station or a Lord Fletcher’s at that location. Hurr said a CUP in residential zoning would provide long term protection. Hurt was not concerned with the neighborhood impact. The example of the DNR access on Maxwell Bay was cited as being chosen for its location near a bus line to provide accessibility to those coming needing to amve by bus from other areas. Hurr said she lives four blocks from that location. Hurr felt there was a need for commitment to the greater metropolitan arev ''n some issues. Kelley said he favored individual property rights. He noted when he moved to the area in 1977, he looked at schools, churches, the comprehensive plan, and development stages of the City. Kdley said once a person has moved into an area, they have the right for stability. A shelter would change the neigH)orhood, although, he agreed the church itself would be a good building for the use. Kelley is opposed to the shelter. Goetten said alot of misinformation was shared with people during the meeting.^ In referring to Kelley's point of people moving into an area for certain ambiances, it do^'t happen according to Goetten. She has lived here for 20 years and changes do and will happen. Goetten feels a women ’s shelter is needed. Goetten is more flexible as to the mechanics. She originally felt the vehicle to use was residential zoning with a CUP, which is the most strict and controlling form. Goetten is supportive of the shelter. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Jabbour says he sees the issue t^o fold, land use and the shelter itself Jabbour feels it would set a bad precedent to allow a shelter or multi-family dwelling in a residential zone This opens the City up to future interpretations, i e. Spring Hill Conference Center, bigger mansions, rehabilitation centers, treatment centers, etc Jabbour does agree a need is there The zoning that allows a similar use would be the B-4, where there is no major difference in land use or multi-use building Jabbour said the zoning should be changed to the B-t from residential. Then the issue was should we aUow the shelter as a B-4 with a conditional use permit This would define where the shelter would be located in Orono providing restricted areas wluch Jabbour said would match the application tor this site. Jabbour questioned whether this would be done for Orono or the Lake Minnetonka residents He asked what guarantee there was that the Orono facility would be used by Orono people Could a certain number of beds be held for area residents only. Jabbour said we need to identify a formula under which our need is fulfilled J^bour indicated this use would have an impact on the neighborhood and would not be a good use m a residential area. r.ii.h.n Mked how we would accomplish the fuHiUnient of that need. Jabboitf said the applicant needs to tell the City that a certain number of beds can be reserved for Orono residents. Callahan said he was more in the middle of the issue. Making changes to an ordinance is a serious matter and needs a serious purpose If he thought there was m absolute need m Orono, this would be a compelling reason. In looking at the ne^ in relation to civic responsibility to the greater Hennepin County area, Callahan said it w nm so compelling Callahan said the question of need has not been answered to his satisfe^on. Statistics can be used to further the view on either side of the issue Callahan said the people in the neighborhood should have the right to say what happens^m ^ neighborhood. Callahan questioned what external issues would be affect^ ^ as the parks street traffic, etc. If the shelter was voted in and problems occurred, the proposal does not give the City any avenue by which to take remedial action. If he were to vote for the proposal, commercial would be the vehicle to use, rather than residemial Although residential could be done for that particular site, Callahan does not feel a shelter belongs in a residential zone. Hurt asked the applicant if they are able to set their own policy, and their mission is to serve their own community, are they able to reserve a certain amount of sj^ to area residents Margaret Weber, a consuhant working with Westonka on their business plan, said the project is not constrained to the open poUcy as long as grant mon^ come from the state. The project is able to reserve be^. CaUahan asked if these beds are not filled, would it not affect the economics of the project. Weber said the business plan could be based on a lower occupancy rate. MINUTES OF THE REGUL-\R ORONO CTI Y COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (#4 - Adult Shelter - Continued) Callahan said if the CLT was changed to a license procedure, could the City exercise mofg discretionary powers over the operation if problems occur. Barrett said the City has no familiarity with licensing with the exception of marinas, and no expenise on licensing or any budget for this possibility. From a practical standpoint, this would be difficult to accomplish. Kelley noted the need to preclude getting a grant from the state in order to reserve beds. Huit said we would have to acknowledge the restriction Callahan referred to Sojourner's open policy serving a larger geographical area, and said the shelter would not need to use this policy Callahan said we are open to suggestions in obtaining more information Jabbour said he was hoping the applicant could furnish additional assistance. The need has to be identified and a commitment received from the applicant that Orono’s needs would be met. Hurr asked if other B-4 zoning had CUP's and if the site plan required a CUP. Mabusth said this was true Hurr then said if the applicant is able to meet the conditions to reserve bids for the service area, the CUP can protect the need to fulfill this obligation Callahan said this potained to an ordinance and docs not relate to people problems but land use. Jabbour felt it was difficult for a City to pull a CUP as there are too many court decisions. Jabbour said he was not in favor of having to enforce a CUP. Hurr said the she review has not been done yet. Mabusth said this would occur after this matter of zoning is settled. The Council is trying to determine if there is a process by which the applicant can apply. Kelley said if the shelter were to move at some point, there is a possibilit v that the next occupant would be a use the City would not recommend. The B-4 provides limited uses and is restricted to municipal, office builduig, clinics, banks, and insurance offices. Examples of use for B-4 with a CUP are nursing homes, hospitals, retirement homes, schools, research centers, veterinarian clinics, libraries, museums, galleries, class I restaurants (corporate cafeterias), and off-street parking. Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to amend the zoning code to allow a domestic abuse shelter in B-4 commercial with CUP as a reqiurement and Staff to look into licensing for the specific use and other needed *:onditions. Jabbour said he would ask that a vehicle be attached where 50% of the beds available were reset ved for the service area presently being serviced. Aves 2-Hurr, Goetten, Nays 3-Callahan, Kelley, Jabbour. MINITXS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CUT COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (•#5) #1999 DAVID AND VICKI VICKERMAN. 2J75 DUNWOOD\ AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-VARIANCE RESOLUTION #3565 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3565. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#6) #2007 TONY EIDEN CO., 2800 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE WEST • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3566 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3566 Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#7) #2015 >L\RK HARRINGTON, 4080 BAYSIDE ROAD - CONDITION.AL USE PERMIT/V’ARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3567 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3567 Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#8) #2017 W ILLIAM HIBBS, 1905 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3568 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3568 Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#9) #2018 RICHARD BORN, 1991 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3569 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3569. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#10) #2022 ROBERT MELAMED, 920 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3570 Mabusth reported that conceptual plans were reviewed in April on the use of the City driveway The Planning Commissioners were concerned that a private road ^ a cul- de-sac would cause a major impact on the wetlands The Planning Commission recommended an access drive with a shared access for lots 1 and 2, and a shared drive off the City driveway for lots 3 and 4. The plans for the septic were acceptable for the site. Mabusth said that in lieu of granting a variance to the code that would have required an internal road for four-lot plat, buffer zones were created with 50 ’ around the perimeter of the subdivision and 30' buffers at shared lot lines and adjacent to expanded dnveway easement. There will be no tree removal within these areas. Covenants specifying under what conditions trees may be removed were drafted. The City will not participate in the covenants MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUN*E 12,1995 (#10 - #2022 Robert Melamed - Continued) Mabusth said the Applicant followed the Park and Council recommendations for a 15’ outlot for a future bike trail. Applicant has also dedicated remainder of required park land area as an outlot at the east side of property. Land taken will be dry buildable area at 62' width, for a total of 84 acres. Council must decide whether the .84 acres ofland or cash payment wiU be accepted by the City for Park Dedication The Applicant would prefer the option of dedicating park land with the 3.2 acres as a road outlot. The Engineer has requested the bike path be graded to a 10’ width for mitigation. Cook said it was difficult to make this request after the development is completed. Mabusth said both the County and City Engineer have approved the access, but asked that the large, old, oak tree be removed for safety reasons. The Planning Commission recommended the use of the City driveway for access to lots 3 and 4 but did not discuss the issue of required upgrades of the drive. Mabusth said the City Attorney submitted a memo. Exhibit R, stating that the City docs have the right to grant itself a variance Four alternatives have been given from a range of a 24' wide road with a cul-de-sac to no ma^or changes. If no additional curb cut is aUowed from the City driveway, then the lot lines would have to be redrawn Mabusth said the County is encouraging the City to allow the access from the City driveway as a safer option. Applicant Melamed reported on his concerns. Melamed prefers an access oflf of the City driveway instead of CoRd 84. A CoRd 84 access would cause the remova of more trees with a cut made through the trees. It was also considered less safe with the ne^ for 2 cuts on County road. Melamed asked the City to grant itself a variance in keeping with the Park and Planning Commission reconunendation not to upgrade the drive to maintain the nature of the presem use to the park and the residences served. Melamed also did not understand the need to grade the bike trail at this time. He did not feel the neighbors would want this done and questioned whether acquisition of property would ever occur to complete the trail. Melamed also voiced his concern with the land dedication versus a buffer zone for outlot B, noting comments from the Park Commission on the difficulty in enforcing buffer zones on lot owners, when the City is able to enforce such zones as the owner. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (#10 - #2022 Robert Mslamed - Continued) Mabusth said the developer is responsible for developing a retention pond, which has not been previously reviewed. The option presented by applicant is for a retention pond at 9000 s.f. in area to be located within the designated wetland area. Other options include an area to the east on lot 4. filling the southeast comer on the City wetlands and reclaiming the area. It was noted that it may not be a good idea to have a developer reclaim an area outside of the deveopment. The Watershed District did net realize that the proposed alteration involved a City designated wetland. The wetland is a type 2, and will be upgraded to a type 3 wetland. Melamed said it has been necessary to redig out land on the east side, which is City owned land. It is probable that Melamed will ask the Council to use the City-owned land as he has not been able to initiate any growth after seeding on the filled area. Cook said the City might wish to preserve this land to use for mitigation on City's behalf at some point. Callahan asked if the concern was with storing rain water Mabusth said that was a concern for property when developed and that run off draias on to the City property. Jabbour asked if the land was presently used as a wetland, how can this land be used for a retention pond. The wetland would be expanded in size to accomodate the need. It was noted that it is possible to mitigate in advance and bank for future use. Kelley commented that he would prefer access to come oflf the City driveway but upgraded to a paved road with a cul-de-sac. He suggested if mitigation was needed for the outlot A (the bike trail) to use the City property, to determine what is needed for bike trail mitigation and subtract this portion off and bank it for future use. Cook replied that this was a very difficult segment of land. If the grading was not done at this time, it would probably never be accomplished. While commenting that the bike trail must cross Old Crystal Bay Road at some point, Kelley noted that the Carpenter property was on the other side of the road and abuts Norenberg Park. Hurr said that Norenberg was a restricted area, and it would be better to build the trail on the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road and then cross over. In reaction to a previous comment from Melamed questioning the need to grade a bike trail that doesn't go anywhere, Hurr noted that the Dickey property trail is only a short segment at this time but is already being used by the public. Hurr is in favor of cutting in the trail at this time. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCH- MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (#10 - #2022 Robert Melamed - Continued) Callahan asked for a recommendation for ouUot B to be dedicated to the City. It noted that the rig.*it.of-way off of Old Ciystal Bay Road was probably not a place for a traU but needed to be located fijtther in on the property. Melamed said this would involve the Idling offvetlands and cutting into a treed area Melamed noted it was not clear as to the location of the bike outlot on the property Hurr said she was not convinced that the 84 acre land was needed for Park Dedicarion noting a lot owner would more than likely want to buffer their property from the was*e control area noise and would maintain the buffering themselves Melamed said the outlot follows along the park land. Jabbour commented that he agreed with Kelley that no variance should be grants to the City for its own convenience Barrett said the City has traditionally treated itself as it would the general public. Callahan moved to claim the property known as outlot B instead of receiving funds for Park Dedication with the property deeded to the City. Jabbour seconded the motion after determining from Chair Flint that this was the recommendation of the Park Commission. Ayes 4, Nays 1, Hurr. Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, for the City Engineer. Park Comirossion Chair, ^ developer to select the land most suitable for the bike trail; and when the land is ^ew upon, the trail wiU be graded and seeded, but not paved. Kelley asked for the de^uon of grading Cook said this is land that is "opened up" to be seeded but no gravel la!d, no base is being asked for. When the trail is to be completed, the top soil would be removed and the area paved. Hurr asked how this compared to the Dickey dcvdopcr, who built the trail section. The Dickey developer was paid for the trail construction. Park Dedication fee was credited. These properties are being treated equally. Melamed wiU receive credit for outlot A and not for grading. Melamed asked if the trail would need to be contained aU within the outlot. Cook replied to the negative, noting easements wodd be needed for some areas and that fiUing of path would require mitigation. When asked by Kelley, it was found that the bike path would be mitigated. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Callahan asked Council members if the driveway should be accessed off of the City drive or Old Crystal Bay Road Kelley noted his support to the City drive citing a safety hardship. Jabbour commented that a hardship is not required if an upgrade is required. Mabusth noted four options for upgrade of the driveway. Hurr responded that a major expansion was not required of the Cygnet upgrade. Jabbour said there was no demonstratable hardship and economics was the reason for the number of dnveways. Callahan said the reason for the driveway was to maintain access the park, and that an upgraded turnaround would take away from the park atmosphere. Jabbour said he was against the drive off of the City driveway, and the City should adhere to higher standards than the public. MLNUTFS OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12, 1995 (#10 - #2022 Robert Melamed - Continued) Kellev asked for the pros and cons on leaving the road unpaved. Flint said issue wasn? discussed by the Park Commission but by the Planning Commission FJjnt did say that he recommended no paving as this would change the park f commented that cars would park on the grass at Norenberg Park, and this did not change that park's characteristics Jabbour asked Peterson why the Planning Commission reco^ended a variance. vTcrson said it was a common sense issue that prevailed He ated the example of the City granting itself a variance in the past with regards to the Crystal Bay ^^t oftce parking lot. A setback variance was required in order to preserve the park area but hardship was defined. Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to allow access off the City road >^th no upgrade or cul-de-sac noting the hardship to preserve the park area. Kelley ^ked that the condition be stipulated that the first few feet into each driveway be paved. The motmn was amended that the blacKtop be installed to City Engineer's s^^ds the shared drive to the discretion of the City Engineer and Staff. Ayes 4, Nays 1, Jabbour Jabbour moved. Hurr seconded, to allow the applicant to dredge and area within City property to southeast to be used to mitigation area lor bdte trail and remainder to be banked by City for the future outlot B. The alteration of the designa wetland within the plat will offset mitigation needs of the internal development. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Melamed was infotmed that he is able to fUe for final plat approval at this time. The Council adopted Resolution «570 as amended above. See vote under each item. mayor /council report Hurt reported her absence at the next meeting of the Council. Hurr inquired if a public information meeting will be held for the persons livmg m the Bracketts Point area regarding road improvements to CoRd 15. No date was set. Jabbour reported that he was informed by Tom VanDunn that the state legislature p^sed the bill regarding the sale of a piece of land on Maxwell Bay back to t*'® P“ DNR The governor has signed the bill. An appraisal of the property Wl co and the land will then be offered for sale to all government agenaes. The land would then go to public auaion, if necessary. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (Mayor/Council Report - Continued) Jabbour also reported that the DNR has obtained land from Jim Dunn on Maxwell Bay, and ne«»ds to obtain one more property' to move forward on the Maxwell Bay access project The historical society has given their approval to *ear down the gas station on the proposed access site, which will be done prior to July 14. Jabbour asked the City to express their appreciation to Gen Olson and other state legislators, who sponsored the bill. Planning Commission Chair Steve Peterson asked the Council for direction with regards to the review of the private driveway ordinance. It was said the fire and police depanments would like 24' roads with a 90* turnaround for emergency equipment. Jabbour said the problem seems to be whether there is a need for the cul-de-sac at the end of the drive Peterson commented that the fire department would like to see a loop- type drive. The Council will report to the Planning Commission on this matter at a later date. ENGINEER REPORT (#11) WILLOW DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT COSTS - INFORMATION ONLY Cook verified that the costs for the Willow Drive intersection improvements were increased by 15% A public hearing will be held at the June 26 meeting of the Council regarding this issue. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•#12) PERSONAL WATERCRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT #136,2ND SERIES Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the revised Personal Watercraft Ordinance #136, 2nd Series. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#13) EMPLOYMENT OF PART-TIME C.S.O. - DAVTD NELSON Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the hiring of David Nelson as a Community Service Officer, which is a part-time position with no benefits, at the hourly wage of $6,431, effective immediately. Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (•#14) TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AT GOLF COURSE Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the employment of Debra Renard as a temporary replacement coumer helper at the Orono Golf Course at an hourly rate of S5.70. effecuve May 25. 1995. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#15) REQUEST FOR OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Callahan suggested tabling this re<|uest until the June 26, 1995, meeting of the Council. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to table the request for off-sale liquor license. A>'es 5, Nays 0. (•#16) BID AWARD - CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the purchase and installation of the playground equipment, fall absorption material, and the burying of the utility lines for the following costs: Playground equipment and tuff timber bordm - Earl F. Anderson Co. Fall absorption material (City forces) Burying of utility lines - All Star Electric TOTAL $14,227 2,500 2.195 $18,922 The monies to pay for the above improvements to be funded from the Park Dedicahon fund. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#17) EMPLOYMENT MATTER No formal action was taken regarding this matter. The Council authorized the Mayor to work on this matter. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Chy Attorney Barr-itt had no report at this tune. (*#18) LICENSES Goetten moved, KeUey seconded, to approve the foUowing Ucenses: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 12,1995 (•#18 - Licenses - Continued) Home Occupation License: Initial Application She Evaluator/Designer License: JuMc LaVerc 995 Wildhurst Trail Swedlund Septic Chaska Septic System Installer License; Coppin Sewer & Water Mound Mid-Minnesota Concrete/Excavating, Inc. Anoka Swedlund Septic Chaska (*#19)BILLS Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 11:40 p.m. Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk couNCiLt:;: . i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION juN 2 6 1996 DATE: JuneCmf^fORCNO ITEM NO.: / - Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2023 Betty Sumner. 3131 Casco Circle - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC Approximate area = 24,625 s.f. Brief Review of Application Applicant proposes the paving of 750.5 s.f. of an area that was originally installed with a plastic underliner covered with rock and wood chips. Prior to the hardcover inventory, applic^ tad removed all plastic underliners placed beneath existing landscape areas. Hardcover is at 42.956 within the 75-250 ’ setback area. Applicant was advised to file a hardcover variance application to ensure that the non-stnictural hardcover improvement would be legal based on current code requirements. Applicant was advised of the City ’s policy to require the removal of certain non- strucuiral hardcover improvements where excesses exist. Ihe applicant was also advised that the City will not require a permit for the paving improvement. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the ^PPljcation as propo^ based on the findings and hardships set forth in the enclosed staff memo of June 14, 1The Planning Commission also reaffirmed staffs action in bringing the applicant before the City to obtain approval for the paving improvements. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either denv, adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. If Council disapws with staffs actions'to require applicant to submit a variance application, staff will refund the entLrc fee payment. . A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE <1^2023 WHEREAS, Tom P. Sumner and Betty K. Sumner (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3131 Casco Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property ); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the installation of approximately 750.5 s.f. of paving improvements within the lakeshore yard of the property where ^2.9% hardcover improvements exist and 25% is allowed. Applicant proposes no change m the 42.9% hardcover. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City CouncU of Orono, Mimiesota: 2. 3. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2023. The property is located in the LR-IC, Lakeshore Residents Zoning Dis<nct requiring 21,780 s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. The property consists of 24,625 s.f. or .57 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 1995, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following umque findings and hardships: A. The property consists of 42.9 % hardcover improvements consisting of the residence structure, a walkway to residence and driveway. Page 1 of 5 B. The property is accessed via a private dnveway located on steep slof^s. Portions of neighboring property owners drive is located within the subject property. C. Applicants have an extensive lakeshore yard where no hardcover improvements exist. D 612 s.f. or 3.4% of the total paving improvement is already located beneath a deck and will not extend beyond that upper level deck. E 138 s.f. of the remaining paving improvements will be located adjacent to a garage door that provides storage for either boats or lawn equipment. F. There will be no increase in hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area as a result of these paving improvements. 4 The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property hk peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council has considcied this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit Ae installation of 750.5 s.f. of paving improvements withm the lakeshore yard and aPPJ® hardcover at 7,515 s.f. or 42.9% within the 75-250 ’ setback area, subject to the followmg conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. 2. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and the above requested improvements must be installed by June 26, 1996 or this variance will expire on that date. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono Cir; Council on this 26th day of June, 1995 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor • Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ’ Notary Public Page 3 of 5 ss. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this_______day of_______________ Public within and for said County, personally appeared_________________—^----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. , 199___, before me a Notary Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199__, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ------------------------------------------------ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (tlieir) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTIOiN OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_________________ EXHIBIT A r->r ■t i ~ » a <■. * n. "trcr<?-f • .v.nr or 1 I;r» -i-awr. rarailel vitn and IX :-e: v»rt»r' • of .vistt^riv li-e o:' lo^ ‘*2 ar.c itn ext-ina io::s -..-.ereof: Lots and ; loat part of Lot l^ir.r East of a lire dro«r. rarall**! wi*.- 7' feet W.jst, ceas-Jred at rirr.t anries fror tnc let H>*: ■o ^ ^ ^ r»•=• of That cart of Lot 6L descri-od ac becinr.inc it th« rro-^t Northerly comer of Lot ok, thence Southvesterly to the ttor.t Wecte-ly comer of Lot 6^; thence East olonjj the South line cf Lot c*» to the Northeast corner of Lot ^2; thonce Northerly, a distance of 51»55 feet, more or less to a point which is on a lire drawn parallel witc and 2^*,CXI feet Southeasterly, neasured at rip-ht angles fror the Northwesterly line of Lot 6h ar.c dirtar.t feet Southwesterly alonj; said parallel line fro- its intersection vith the extension North of the East line of Lot 42; thence Northeasterly alonr said parallel line and its extensios, a distance of 6ri,9'‘ feet, more or less to the Northeasterly line of Lot 64; thence Northwesterly to the point of herinnir-7. That part of vacated Lake Shore Avenije anU that za'-z of the tract of land between said avenue and the shore cf Lake Minnetonka, all described as berir.nin^ at the Southeast comer cf Lot 4^; thence West along the South line of Lots 4?, 44 ana 4f to an intersection with a line drawn parallel with end 7y feet -'errt, messured at right an-ies fro= the East line of Lot i***; thence South along the extension of said oarallel line to the shcr» of lake Minnetonka: thence East along said chore to its intersecticr. wi tn the extension South of the East line of Lot ~2\ thence North to the point of beginning. ail in Spring Park. Page 5 of 5 7, To; From: Date: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 14, 1995 Subject: #2023 Betty Sumner, 3131 Casco Circle - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Approval of a hardcover variance within 75-250’ setback area. Total area = 17,500 s.f. Allowed = 4,375 s.f. or 25% Existing = 7,515 s.f. or 42.9% Proposed = 7,515 s.f. or 42.9% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Lakeshore Improvement Sketch F - Hardcover Improvement Plan G - Survey Description of Request Applicant proposes the removal of approximately 750.5 s.f. or 4.2% of non-structural hardcover consisting of landscape and patio areas underlain with plastic and covered with wood chips. The area is to be paved with permanent concrete, review E'diibit A. On your inspection you will note that applicant is removing landscape areas underlain with plastic so as to mmimize hardcover. The majority of hardcover results from the extensive blacktop drive and a limited paved walkway. Members may remember the review of the application involving the property to the immediate east. A portion of that driveway encroaches applicant ’s property. In early conversations with applicant ’s contractor, he advised that the property had excessive hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area and that applicant wished to place concrete paving over landscape areas underlain with plastic and wood chips. Staff further advised the owner and applicant of the need to file a variance application as once staff has been advised that excesses exist, based on Council directives, owner should be advised to remove ^e excesses when those excesses result from landscape areas underlined with plastic or geo-grid. The applicant has agreed to file a hardcover variance to allow the installation of permanent paving improvements where excesses of hardcover exist. Zoning File #2023 June 14, 1995 Paee 2 Review Exhibit E, applicant ’s contractor has also placed stones over existing grade in an attempt to minimize erosion of the sloped bank area at lake. In addition, there is a^itional rock placed to the west side of the lakeshote yard for the obvious storage of a boat. There apjxars (0 be a section of black underliner plastic within the central portion of the area. Apphcant should advise if this is to be removed. If not, the hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area should be amended. Staff can confirm that the newly installed rock within the lakeshore yard does not have plastic or geo-grid underliner. 1.612 s.f. or 3.4% of the paving improvement is located beneath the deck. 'y 9 138 s.f. of remaining paving improvement will be located adjacent to an access door that provides storage for either a boat or lawn equipment. 3.Should the applicant have been advised to file a hardcover variance with the City? erosion or sediment running into lake. Options of Action To either approve or deny hardcover variance as proposed. ..-J CITY OF ORONO - V.\R1.ANCE APPLICATIONn Initial Application Fee S2C0.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal V’ariance Fee S 100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S^OO.O After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY' INFOR>L\TION Site Address .AllU.v ^ > ^! ‘C% if t ji ^ w. . . Site Address ___—TU nnm Proper^' IdenuficationPropem- Idenufication >umDer -^y nj ' • ^ sur\'ev. Attach legal description to application if not me u Date Pro^rrv' Acquired--------L^/ ^----;—7-r-i---------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels 0 ’ Present use of property: _y^residential -----other (specity| Zoning District: (month/'year) APPLICANT Name___rZ u ^ 11 n'’ Aj •£ Phone (home) <^7! ^ T Y ^ o_ Phr)np(work) N<^ - Address:^ I ^ »HSeC City: oc-ouO Zip: ■S'5'3 *=> / _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_____________________ Phone(home) Phone (work)_ Address;City:Zip: Estimated Construction Cost S /}) CjG 0description of REQUE^ ^-AluS Describe requcjar'‘ku il: ——A-, l <yaA dkCP' * VARIANCES required Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side J Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION of UNX'SUAL property conditions ^^cribe undue hardship or practical d.fficult^or unusual P'°P^ “““ J co.pIian« with zoning Code . ^ -lilN A-t/s/iiy-x< <*- —Vii «eM ic:—it-ii-------------------- - ^ ^ +L- r^cjj^____ ,-Y f rO-girtRv/___£2iA 9^ ^3 to t. ^ -tb- dUt^n W -«v*OW 1.^ 1. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS . ■■ .f ,K. f„lln„Hn, must b« subminert hv the application rt^^dlin^ date in order for vmir aprlirntion to considered complete! Ust of owners within 150 ’ (you must obmin mis list from ~T Hennepin County Department of Finance A-bOa. Govt Center, a^- ). Plat Map (obtained with property-ovvner^ su„evor) and include hardcover -StmLis m'^^^cd^n a'Jdit-orprovide one (1) copy S." . U" for reproduction. nrnnosed elevations) if anv chanaes in existing grade you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. T~^ciui .c, cJon this aonlication Please remember that ioui* - — -r re” bT^H^r'pa^S information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her kno g . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Applicant’s Signature '^dJCy ^Date members for purposes of investigation and venftcation of this request. Owner’s Signamte ^iXu^Date li\ this change prior to the meeting. 8 > f'IRUN DATE 04/27/95BATCH 503 «'PROP AOOR f»MER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 20-117-23 34 000703131 CASCO CIR J P StMCR < E K SUtCR JOHN P SUrt4ER EILZABETH K SUttCR 3131 CASCO CIR HAYZATA HN 55391 3B 20-117-23 43 0029 03135 CASCO CIR ROLANO C AMLAJOSON ROLANO C AHUNOSON MINNESOTA JUDICIAL CTR 25 CONSTITUTIONAL AVE ST PAUL MN 55155 ■r'lt«■?MXrtCPlN COUKTY PROPERTY IHrORHATIQN SYSTEHjPROPERTY ONNERS LIST ’ } i.: I*»•' •I.REPORT NO. PI43S401 >• 'A!PACE 14 *A .38 20-117-23 34 OOOB03129 CASCO CIR CERTRUOE H OOUCALL GERTRUDE H OOUCALL ' 5100 NEHTON AVE S MPLS MN 55419 if J.NB*t. i 38 20-117-23 43 0030 03133 CASCO CIR G C BECKER/T I MARCHESSAULT }t 38 20-117-23 34 002203127 CASCO CIR J HONARO A 0 HONARO JAMES A DCMtt HONARO 3127 CASCO CIR HAYZATA m 55391 •}*• 4*• • .»V 4 • * V • •. G C BECKERyT I HARCHESSAULT « ¥• : / 3133 CASCO CIR . ORONO MN 55391 • It • «<. V '4 i ^' TOTAL BATCIi^^;503 00005 \' I . « j •••• • . * • . • *. I !• . .• ♦ • • « V i ' »• J * . ?; . > ..O ' 7. i - Pj _ .J' • % -• >• V V J <•i4 9 , • • f;*'- 1x;.- . v -r" ..>• . 1 1 \ • • • r • 4 1 ■ ■ ; ♦ V' . ^ ' • ^ •; • ...o'l ■i ■4 I ! « i r.i•. V If •f II */1-* » / ♦ *r I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORD OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST HARDCOV'ER CALCULATION U ORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE:) 0-75 EXISTING hardcover IN ZONE D 250-500* A. House 5 5-4/5 Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Dnveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plas ’ic G. Other 30 /C^ 30 5'o X X X X X X X X X ¥Q /A IS TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROP|P^ AREA IN ZONE^ ^ proposed HAWnrOVER IN ZONE A. House_ _ _ _ _ _ __ * - Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X X X X X X X X X X G. Other TOT,- L HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY>REA IN ZONE ^\ 7j 3(>t0 X 100 = AlO isjs 100 ■ 9c 2.Q£-n£oo._ 5)0-1000’ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. *7 S"0 S.F. S.F. 7 0(0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^5/J> S.F. A B A B : 2 N <Si^' i f. - ' ‘ ».^ - ' * -.**»•*- A » ** - , ' ■*• ''I- i < *-L • • -• . V . • *””IxiLjI .* ^‘;.' |i!W'P;:• ■XSjiJ':' '■5LV« X « 1 » / r\ luf ^fZ n- i -.#-»» • %#- .•iMK* I 5*1<WI « X I ' t Jiy}. -------- ---- ; ‘ I “X.N.VtVir^} — «*••* ■. ‘'%: #‘ « I • • •*• • % a • • •.As V 1. f % L - r - >•< 1- X r* «. Mj • yii «• ‘'a.'. "i-7. _ ^ % »k ‘ I • x ** .* • ■ ’' i '»'*»• * ' I * #\ « ' * t'' v;-.. *.r^ 9 \ K. ■li. ,* “ ----------- • -. \.*x - 0 Zl €? « \ -r -r ^ \ p ^ \ . \ \ *iU 34 I • • . ’i. * % .. ••• • * . k * ^. :• t * .• • V *. . V ■ \ ...'.? •. • \ ^ • . • J:' V '■ f' ; ♦ ■ •■ .- •:. .•■. i. ■■ ^ • •-V • ■? .r . A .♦• : * ; * • .* /. •i '>.• r-i- :.■■ ; • t *. • COUNCIL [.'EETl. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION J U N 2 6 1995 DATE: ITEM NO.= 7 Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2024 James Wilson. 2565 Lydiard Avenue - Conditional Use Permit Resolution Zoning District: B-4/LR-1B , .. • r. a Review Exhibits N and Q. The majority of this property is located within B-4 zone. Approximate area = 33.239+ s.f. (exclusive of Lydiard Avenue right-of-way) Brief Review of Application For more detail on this review, please refer to the staff memo dated June 15, 1995 enclosed within your packet. James Wilson has applied for a conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property considered a non-conforming use in the B-4 zone. Review Exhibits H thru O that detail the zoning history of the property. In 1959 when the Elliots built the residency the Zoning Code was vague enough so that a residence was constructed within an area defu^ as a commercial zone. There are no specific uses listed within the 1950 Zoning Code effective at the time of the construction of the residence. The use at that time may have been found to be compatible based on the three standards set forth in the Code. The Elliots have owned the property from 1959 to the present. Mrs. Elliot, who lived in the residence up through December of 1994, is now deceased. Some members may remember the former fabric shop that was operated from the commercial area of the structure adjacent to Shadywood. The family of Mrs. Elliot now offer the property for sale. The current applicant would like to retain the residence and also operate his accounting office. The office/professional use would be a permitted use within the existing B-4 zone. The applicant advises that he is assisted by one full-time and one part-time employee during the tax season. He may, b^ed on work load, hire an additional part-time employee. Review Exhibit E, the oiUy alteration proposed within the structure is the installation of new partitions to create an additional office area. The Planning Commission agreed that if a residential use was to be retained on property along with a business use that it would be necessary to create controls on the permitted commercial use. In addition to the improvements recommended by the City Engineer, the Planning Commission added the following: Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 June 22, 1995 Zoning File miA 1. The commercial operation would be limited to four employees. 2. One commercial sign to be installed at the Shadywood location and to not exceed the size of the signage allowed for the fabric shop use. Planning Commission members noted the written comments from a neighboring property owner in support of the application. Exhibit P. Staff also noted that in informal discussions with neighboring property owners that they also wished to encourage the continued use of the property as residential. It was also noted the location of the residential and commercial uses within the structure have minimal impact on the immediate adjacent residential neighborhood. All commercial use will continue to be operated from the Shadywood side of structure. Wanning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property, a non-conforming use within the B-4 zone. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either deny, approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 5 FILE NO. 2024 WHEREAS, James T. Wilson (hereinafter the "applicant") has an interest in the property located at 2565 Lydiard Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: refer to Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property, a use not permitted within the B-4, Office and Professional Business District. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cou.ncil of Orono, 1. 0 3. 4. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2024. The property is located within the B-4. Office and Professional Commercial District and LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. The majority of the 33,239 s f. property is located within the B-4 Zoning District. In 1959, the City issued a building permit for the construction of the residence and commercially-used portion of the structure. The 1950 Code at that time did not specify specific allowed uses within the "commercial district". In 1967, the Code was amended and created a specific zoning district with a list of permitted uses redefined as the B-1 Commercial District. The zoning boundary lines remained approximately the same as in 1950. The 1967 Code would allow only multiple dwellings with a conditional use perm»t. Single family residential use was not listed. Page I of 6 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. In 1975, the City amended the Zoning Code creating a B-4, Ottice and Professional Zoning District, and rezoned the subject property to B-4. The existing retail use conducted in the "fabric shop" would have been considered non-conforming. There is no record of the owner of the property obtaining a conditional use permit to allow either the single family residential or retail use to continue on the property. Valerie M. Elliot owned the property from 1959 through to the present. The property is now being offered for sale. Applicant has applied for the required conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property. Applicant ’s proposed use of the commercial part of the structure for office professional use is conforming with the existing Zoning District. The location and layout of the residential and commercial uses within the structure are compatible with the older established residential neighborhood on Lydiard Avenue to the south and west and to the commercial area to the north and east along Shady wood Road. There is a duplex dwelling to the immediate south of the property at Lydiard Avenue. The City is in receipt of a letter from a Lydiard Avenue resident approving applicant ’s request to continue the residential use of the property ^d not restoring the entire structure to commercial office use. The City has received no negative oral or written comments from adjacent property owners. Applicant proposes no expansions of the existing building envelope. On June 19, 1995 liie Orono Planning Commission voted to recomrnend unanimous approval of the conditional use permit based on the following findings. a. The single family residential and commercial use has existed on this property for approximately 37 years. Page 2 of 6 b. The uses as proposed will be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial districts. 13. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of this property will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding propert>’ values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 14. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above fmdings, the Orono City Council concludes that the single family residential use of this property is a legal non-conforming uw and hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5. This approval is subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a Hennepin County Department of Transportation permit to allow the trimming of plantings within the County right- of-way adjacent to the Shadywood curb cut in order to meet required sighting distance to ensure safe exiting from the property. Further, applicant shall either relocate curb cut within the property or obtain an easement from property owner for portions of paved curb cut that encroach property to the immediate north. Applicant shall designate three parallel parking stalls along the south side of the paved drive as shown on Page 6 of this resolution. Applicant shall complete the designation of the stalls prior to the City issuing a building permit for remodeling within commercial area of structure. 1. 14#' Page 3 of 6 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant’s accounting business shall be limited to four employees and signage for the business use shall be limited to one sign similar in size to the single sign on the property that served the former commercial use. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant but arc permissive only. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of June, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf ot the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ------------------------^^----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, ana acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DFSCRIPTION That part of Lot 6. Block 4. TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK, lying North of a line drawn at right angles to the East line of said Lot 6 and distant 1156.19 feet South from the Northeast comer of Section 20, Township 117 North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, and mnning to the Northwesterly line of said Lot 6, subject to an easement for street purposes over the East 33 feet thereof; also subject to the rights of the public in that part of said lot now used for County Road No. 19. To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator 7 From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:June 15, 1995 Subject:#2024 James Wilson, 2565 Lydiard Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District:B-4/LR-1B. Review Exhibits N and Q, the majority of this property is located within B-4 zone. Approximate area = 33.239±s.f. (exclusive of Lydiard Avenue right-of- way) Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 - Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to allow the continued residential use of the property, considered a non-conforming use on a B-4 property. 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover. Review Exhibits C and Q. Applicant’s surveyor designates a smaller area located within 1,000’ of lake. Per the plat map, staff has identified a greater portion of the property being located within 1,000’ of lake although major portions of paving and commercial use are located out of the 1,000 setback. List of Exhibits A - Bl-2 C - D - E - FI - F2 - G - H - I - J - Kl-5 L - M - N - 01-2 P - Q - Application Applicant’s Addendum Plat Map Property Owners’ List Floor Plan-Commercial Use Portion of Building Engineer’s Report Engineer’s Sketch Copy of Early Assessment Record-House Built in 1959 1950 Zoning Map-Carman’s Bay Commercial District Allowed Uses 1950 Code 1967 Zoning Map, B-1 Commercial 1967 Zoning Code 1975 Zoning Map, B-4 Commercial 1975 Zoning Code, B-4 Current Zoning Map Current Zoning Code, B-4 Commercial Neighbor’s Approval Survey Zoning File #2024 June 15, 1995 Page 2 History of Property The Elliot family constructed the existing residence in 1959, refer to Exhibits G, H and I Sometime after the construction of the home, the commercial addition to the northeast side of the residence was constructed. Some members may remember the former fabric shop located within commercial part of strucmre. The commercial use of the property ceased sometune within the last 10 years. Mrs. Elliot has resided at the residence through December of 1994 when Mrs. Elliot passed away. The property' is currently being offered for sale. In reviewing the vague description of allowed uses in the 1950 code, it would appear that as long as the use was found to not involve a negative impact on the commercial district that a permit for residential construction was issued by the City. In 1967, review Exhibits J and Kl-5, the commercial zoning district was now reclassified as B-1. The uses were clearly defined. Note that multiple dwellings were allowed as a conditional use permit in the B-1 zone. Finally, in the 1975 codes and current codes, property was rezoned to B-4, Office Professional Use District. Residential dwellings, except for retirement homes and nursing homes, are no longer allowed. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5, the applicant and future owner of the property asks the City to allow the continued use of the residential structure for residential use. The applicant also proposes the use of the commercial part of the structure for his accounting business. Both applicant and an assistant would be full-time and a part-time person used during the tax season. The use would be consistent with those uses allowed within the B-4 zoning district. Refer to Exhibit P, the neighboring property owner at 2615 Lydiard Circle recommends approval of the continued use of the structure as a residence. In informal conversations with property owners of that area, they have noted support for the continued use of the residence structure as a residence and would be greatly concerned if the entire structure was to be used for an office commercial use because of the surrounding residential development. As with Zelma McKinney ’s conditional use permit application for a non-conforming use, this property also has been under single ownership for over 40 years and property subject to major zoning code amendments through those years. Staff has not asked for hardcover facts. As already noted above, the majority of paving/structural improvements will be located out of the 1,000’ setback. In addition, applicant proposes no improvements that involve the expa^ion of the building envelope nor of paving improvement. Review Exhibits FI and 2, the Engineer has reviewed^the commercial entrance area and has recommended parallel parking along the south side of the paved area leaving the north side open as a through roadway connecting Lvdiard and the County road curb cuts. On your site inspection, observe the area of concern noted by Engineer at the north entrance. Applicant will have to work closely with the County to achieve the necessary clearance of vegetation to open up the sighting distance from that curb cut. It would be staffs guess that the majority of the vegetation would be located within County right-of-way, although applicant should contact property owner, Clair Rood, to immediate north if shrubs or trees are to be trimmed back. Zoning File #2024 June 15, 1995 Page 3 Review Exliibit E, applicant proposes the installation of partitions to create a second office area. Applicant proposes no changes within the residential use. Access to the residence will continue to be off Lydiard and all commercial activities will be located off Shadywood. All sisnage allowances for the commercial use will be subject to the signage standards for the B-4 zone. Applicant may wish to consider whether he wishes a permanent address assigned at a Shadywood or Lydiard Avenue address. Although the application has been brought under a Lydiard Avenue address, a Shadywood Road address is the current official designation. Issues for Consideration 1 . Will the proposed multiple residential and commercial use of this property require special limitations or restrictions on commercial use? The residential unit within this zoning district requires one acre. The property is less than one acre although the B-4 zoning district would require only 20,000 s.f. The commercially-used portion of structure is a single story 26 ’ x 24’ addition. Should the conditional use permit specify an approved number of employees for the commercial use? Applicant proposes two full-time staff members and a part-time person. Parking and safety issues alone necessitate some type of control of the commercial use. 2. Do members agree that hardcover information is not necessary with Uiis review? If applicant at some time in the future proposes any additions or paving expansions, hardcover inventory would have to be provided with the permit. 3. The neighborhood appears to be in complete support of the continued residential use. The location of the residential and commercial uses of the strucnire present minimal impact on the immediate adjacent residential neighborhood. Do members have other concerns? Options of Action To either deny or approve James Wilson ’s conditional use application to allow continued residential use of the B-4 zoned property considered a non-conforming use based on some of the findings suggested in the staff memo above, i.e. history, zoning of 1950, pattern of surrounding residential development, layout/design of structure, no proposed expansions of structure..... If the application is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A) (1-3). Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions. 1. Conditions set forth by City Engineer in his report dated June 7, 1995 that includes a recommended site plan indicating three designated off-street parkmg stalls. •'7 Zoning File #2024 June 15, 1995 Paae 4 2.Any controls or limits to be placed on commercial use of property while residential use is permitted. a. b. Limits on number of employees. Review of all building permits that result in an expansion of either the commercial or residential use. 3. Others recommended by Planning Commission CITY OF ORONO - GENER.A.L LAND US /•;, O ff y .v» Propenv' Identification Nur-ber (P.I.D.) D7 ^—U----QQAJ---------------------- APPLICA.'^ . . . , AddresTTW '^‘5 Phone rhome) _______ Phone (work) ^ I ~ A!?<7 "7 City nVl inn Zip OWNTR (if different than applicant)'^i^*^'-'‘'^‘'';'‘-' *rnwnc vu'Jiiic;. Artdr^^r^> (/7T(>7 / mmAr. —m t than (home) DateProperty Acquired ___________________—------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.(X) For each variance request with CUP application 5125.00 Residential Accessory Use 5200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) 5175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments 5150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg 5250.00 Commercial/Indusirial Use 5200.00 Land Alteration . -------- Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, reuining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule 5100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) . OTHER applications , , r x $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) S250.(X) Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) 5300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule Zip f)l<4'/0 _____(month/year) PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____ Present Use of Property Residential _ Other (specify) X f - . - \ REQUIRED SUBMTTT.VLS Completed Application Form. -----?ertr,ed ottm Lis. of owners wiUun 350’ frou can obtain 'is. I.om Hennepin Count>- Depanment of Finance, A-603. Government Center, 348-3271). ----- CenificTte of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey !^ch le2al description to application if not included on requ^ed survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations invol chanaes in elevation (grades). List of the leeal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the propem'. This would include namets) of applicant(S) it not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ------ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate l.s. of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. SUBMITITD. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign Utis application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Depanment that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. XhTappli^ LreS^at^^ provide all information required or requested by the Zoi^g SmSmo agrees to pav additional fees (staff time not covered by ongmal fee payment) e.xpenses incurred in review of this application, and cenifies that the information supplied is true and conea to the best of his/her knowledge. v\, \La, (DateApplicant’s signature m^Mr*herebv'ackmowlilges and agr.-.-s to .h s application and further onto the pmperry by City staff, c. .l.-r ts. agenB, commission members, and Counc.l members for purposes of investigation and • liication of this request. . . „ Otiv,. TfUQ- _ Date (^tacC<^_ A^. uScu^, 01H7O 5(3\,-©3S-5-|SS ’ ADDlicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planmng commssion rnmmission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is un^Ie ^ 7onine Office please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Bull mg of this change prior to the meeting. ^jxmziL IZ7. ERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT b .;. ;« . :)•i if jfrr / • , v; 4i ^ ■/ * ' ^ • '.—J *1 4444 SHORELINE DRIVE P.O. BOX 95 MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612)471-0547 Ci-':y of Orono Crystal Bay, Minnesota I am at this tine requesting a Non-Conforming Residential Permit on the property located at 2565 Lydiard Avenue. The property previously was a business and owner occupied dwelling, and I think that the location lends itself to this use. I am a Certified Public Accountant .practicing in the area for thirteen years. I have one time employee year round and one part time employee in the months January through April. I have enclose i ar .?/. barged copy of the survey showing the proposed changt * to the floor plan for the business portion of the residence. Sincerely, '. Vilson, CPA 1995 ^XVnSL !Z7. n44/lO/2 A ^ / CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT O O 4444 SHORELINE DRIVE ’ P.O. BOX 95 j -la MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612)471-0547 City of Orono Crystal Bay, Minnesota Dear Sirs, I would like to request that my Non-Conforming Residential Permit be considered by both the Planning Conimittee on June 19th and also by the full Council on June 26th. The closing date is scheduled for July 1st, so your attention tho this matter would be greatly appreciated. I apologize for any inconvenience that this request creates. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, e T. Wilson, CPA May 16, 1995 RUN DATE 04/lVfS oW MTCH 509PROP AOOR ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR HEr#«PlM COUNTY PROPERTY INPORHATION SYSTCH PROPERTY OmERS LIST PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0#CR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AOOR OWBR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OH^R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR SS tO-117-23 11 0005 02585 LYOIARO AVE OLENOON J OLSON OLENDON OLSON 2585 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR m 5555158 20-117-25 11 0021 02565 LYOIARO AVE V M ELLIOTT TRISTEE VALERIA M ELLIOTT 2565 LYOIARO AVE NAVARRE m 55592 58 20-117-25 11 0029 02565 SHAOYNOOO RO OEANNA M LEACH CUIR ROOD 2215 KENNOOO NAY NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 11 0058 02520 SHAOYNOOO RD FRESHHATER FOUNDATION FRESHWATER FOUNDATION 725 CO RO 6 NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 16 0005 02625 LYOIARO AVE C H HILLIAMS ET AL C H HILLIAMS ACL ALVAREZ 2625 LYOIARO CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 22 0011 02570 LYOIARO AVE T A RYAN A P J RYAN THOMAS A RYAN 2 HACLYNN RO EXCELSIOR m 55551 58 20-117-25 11 000602595 LYOIARO AVE P A E LENOXPHILIP A ELIZASCTH LENOX RT 1MAPLE kAIN MN 5555958 20-117-25 11 0027 02677 SHAOYNOOO RO DUA^4E N HALL DUANE N HALL 17805 CRESTLINE MUMBLE TX 775H 58 20-117-25 11 0050 02525 SHAOYNOOO RO OEATtU M LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENNOOO NAY NAYZATA MN 55591 IY f »> 38 20-117-2S 18 0001 02605 LYOIARO CXR 6 L MALTZEN • 0 J LERVXK 6ARY L HALTZEN BONNIE J LERVZK 2605 LYOIARO CIR ORONO MN 55351 38 20-117-23 18 0006 02680 KELLY AVE J R A S L VOLKMAR JOHN R 8 SHERRY L VOLKMAR 2680 KELLY AVE excelsior m 55331 i8 21-117-23 22 0012 4; 02636 LYOIARO AVE Y 0 N HCCUSKEY 8 C F HCCUSKEY OAVIO H 8 COttaE F HCCUSKEY 2636 LYOIARO AVE 1 EXCELSIOR m . 55331 .1 1 • n 1 if $ c u n RCRORT NO. PX8SS801 RACE 29 ^858 20-117-25 11 0007 02560 KELLY AVE ^ Kim K NELSON KIRK K NELSON 2560 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 5555158 20-117-25 11 0028 02555 SNAOYNOOO RO OEANNA M LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENNOOO NAY NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 11 0056 02500 SHAOYNOOO RO UNIVERSITY OF MI»t4ES0TA RESENTS U OF N/REAL EST OFF SHOPS BUILOINQt SUITE 101 519 15TH AVE 8 E MPLS MN 55655-0199 58 20-117-25 16 0002 02615 LYOIARO CIR MICHAEL L GILBERTSON ET AL MICHAEL L A KAREN GILBERTSON 2615 LYOIARO CIRCLE S EXCELSIOR m 55551 58 20-117-25 16 0018 02620 KELLY AVE GINGER L PRITCHARD GINGER L SCOTT 2620 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55551 58 21-117-25 22 0015 02585 SHAOYNOOO RO 0 M SCHULTZ ETAL DONALD N SCHULTZ 2585 SHAOYNOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 55551 .• • T.k* • t • 8 » • 6 \ I .'f RUN DATE 04/XVfS EATCM 509 ITTtCPIN COUNTY PROP!RTY INFO^UTlON SYSTlN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIAS5401 PAGE SO • v». %. . >PROP AOOR OMCR NUC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOORPROP ADOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADOR ONNER HAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR M £1-117-25 ££ 0010 0250S OLD REACH RO K 0 SHERMAN I J 0 SHERMAN KIRK D/JAC9UELINE 0 SHERMAN £505 OLD REACH RO HAYZATA M4 555915R £1-117-25 25 0050 02A4R LYDIARO AVE E e FREESE « J P FREESE ELOON 6 « JOANN P FREESE 24AR LYDIARO AVE 5R 21-117-25 ££ 0019 02555 OLD REACH KO T M t A A COOUTE THOMAS M A ALICIA A COOUTE £555 OLO REACH RO NAYZATA m 55591SR £1-117-25 £5 0051 02650 LYDIARO AVE B J BAUER i J J BAUER BRUCE J BAUER £660 LYOIARO AVE 5R 21-117-25 ££ 0020 02505 OLO BEACH RO E N BLANCH CO LTO PTNSHP E N BLANCH CO LTO PTNSHP 5500 N ROTH ST MPLS m 5565150 £1-117-25 £5 0057 02760 KELLY AVE JOHN 0 MUIR ETAL MRS PHYLLIS E OMALLEY 2760 KELLY AVE 55551CXCCLSIOP m S533X EXCELSIOR MN 55551 ‘E>^ELSIQR MN S8 2X-117-2S 25 0058 50 21-117-25 £5 0055 .* * - p • ‘ ■ V ■ t 027^ KELLY AVE 02720 KELLY AVE * JOm L KOZAR ETAL CATHERINE HANSON NEAGHER s JOm L KOZAR 2750 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55551 CATHERINE HANSON NEAGHER 2720 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 5555X • ^ . • • .*• *. %A J ‘1 ; • * ■rj ♦ . •. TOTAL BATCH \ • • . 1 • -t- • t : * ' . . • ■ • . • • *\ .1 • • • • • * 509 00026 1 CERTIFY THAt THE FACTS RfpRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMAHON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEftlEPlN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OP PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDCE AND BELIEF.■ f ■ 6*s • »' DATE 4-20 •95', V ■fi: I <, • ; ■■ ■■■ J 1 * ■ 'ri* « •.* > f 4^ % •* B -; • i I . * 4 .* i ■'» «. • t* • • - AI’ [•* f • ,v>• ! '■ it ■ u ' ■ B ; . • 4 ‘ . ^ '' u />, ■\N , 0 ) 7 7 .• * t"«/ u f / f o C- t jar ✓ u O Z' r A n r> mmm iC*^i^** i''*3 :V / soc;Tf-/\eooo !• • •y\ r^“O' k^ rd Avenue SOUTH 153.85-1156.19 .0 vS Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& IvJl Associates Engineers & Architects June 7, 1995 •- i 7w.' • r • • ; t • • • j ', .M \\ r ■t»* (» \ r . :. r jt •*' *f : • V •'I .• i A r *. 1 c - •' • • ‘ ^ *» * »•••» * 5 V.** ♦ A ‘-I. f*' • ' f •,l ; *\>r ' ‘ ,•**'• > >•3* ‘ e j -f •»' AiA C ' •-•‘J C 8 ^ rT*,-«*i *,* •• • / “ f V’ r .. *t A 4. —. » 4 - r •/ - •» . .' — ’t • **1. ■ * '• ......*• >f V««* ' * ^ * .* C t .•'* A Vi P j J A I A Z e .' £ J«jr A ^<4 St •■'*''<3* ^ J i ‘ AeM »F Vf • D A.«r.= »f Vir 8 ‘••r•.•'*-( *f ;. •: c ■-•.•*•' •? • L A “'t . .• ......................... p-. •»« * ., r »1 . “« '4: ^ -'A.v‘ rC %'e* G •■'t . '**1^0 ^ r § »um p? .e«^-ey . £•• •• n^e* J.:seoh ff "t'e r ~*t lee V V^n C*'.v e», * £ t • ‘ j* le ; M e *.\r ••¥ * l^e* \f r 3 C if. e,**'3* Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Janies Wilson CUP File No. 139*2024 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the certificate of survey for the James Wilson residence at 2565 Lydiard Avenue. Although the existing driveway with an access to both Shadywood Road and Lydiard Avenue is not desirable, it offers the best access given the present constraints. The driveway can accommodate three spaces for parallel parking along the south side. A through lane should be kept open on the north side of the driveway and the three spaces along the south side should be striped. The trees and vines along the west side of the northerly access presently obstruct the view to Shadywood Road. These trees should be trimmed back to improve the sight distance at the access. It appears that the trees may be located on the adjacent property. Lot 2, Block 1, Leach Addition (PID # 20-117-23-11- 0029). Also, a portion of the paved driveway encroaches into this lot. The applicant should discuss the situation with the owner(s) of this property. A driveway easement should be obtained by the applicant or the access should be removed from the adjacent lot. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours ver>' truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 /> -\ j • •. ipje ai Mfiioir^^.•■•‘tV . 4^ ^ jr^^r ' *-j* --------1------------ yn^cjuniow or fMWCtwr’V JBaJ **■>1^rwnwifiwiMi>= o»4.^h— » \ivi.' 4^ » • .... C4»»c«|*VV ’?' « ««u« Ic. ,k. mm .. 4 7 ■:. J__________; '■ • ■ i». • V. V ■ - fT* ’ *^_____j ijT — I lir a imT"* ■ ■ — i ------I|I1_, ^!m_ ~ |S35at z;'^ ,*T» .......~ ' >TSgi=:Jtl -g-^ - _ * 'i^Cm - #4*^__ _________________I • ‘ JR^^:-I.. . ■•/_x ; ^ - I ^ r| ---Kii • •^ -11 I ‘ j 5 Ju } - T^.j----*. ______ ftyt44 k in>Ml ryv»\»«r<t 1«ka,y: -I ^ J 't *4r I:Tl ▼ . ■• WHV ^ - '1-ZT" I z r z: —;■■- t Z ^'~ J ^~f ' ~ ----- 31 Z — --------OJ^ ti^M____r: • * ;• . . i iv% ' 'r}:J 4 ,r> ‘ • • • • . • . . ^ . 4 ,. J. ♦ ^- M * » ^ • . • . \ . * . - I ' oiTxinjwvni " V, I’ - * ,t i .•/* •" ■ ■ -------------------------------------------------^ -:-* • • wx V ^ : •UILMNC DUCIUM AND OtTBUILOINCS *• •" " *;' <’ • / ' *wZ ■ -----------*j«« »• wij^^.4—i» ___.-J___.-.iz..., ; ------- \ • •* •/ fc..i 1 r. • »»'v’ •.* ^ [9^:* g~i £2, v4'.;; ‘. s i / A?PJ, vn '«n; I'ivr ‘ .r* J ^beptt *:.*' J i; vi:...*Si..'» W -,*<1 :C^ / Mpin County, MinnavoU theiw^ MUlhcrly alonf ihr eaitrrly Un« of Mid pUi of ‘*N«v*rf«*** to • point t*f.i nun dred Afty fc*t (ISO) luuttiorl) •nvthins Ki-iHn contomr«1 (>e con- 9(1 u«d t> I 't'hibit thi (io« of any buildiriK ' • iM\ tiauf in.iu«tr>‘ •M piul '♦n»n 'or whn )• 9uch huild<r(' •VH.9 uwvl 4t Ihr tunr of ,-y ( mm, h‘:h-7M •J-Si*-:':',;-- of the aouthorly line of the i ihr .•••« pt v>n of (hit re« lution n(ht of way of County Hoad and ao-l the enart- No 7; thrnre euterly paral- nieiu (Iu> reauiation and re r»*e • y-m. i ) lel with the north line i>f taid section twenty (20) to a point distant two hundred Afty (ISO* fcft south westerly at right angles from the south erly line of County iload No 19; thence iowtheastrrly par allel With the centei Ime of Mid Cmmty lt«>,i I No 14 (•• the south'-ustei l> line of L>>t Foiii <ti lll<M k Km<i i4i TowiiHite of LangdoP r«rk, thence fcoulhwegtei 1\ on the p'i .. ir.;'. t-y,.'- A). ' • I - • : f ' ' . ' * 1 ' stri< tioii. Ml 'roin construi ling any ; |l iiMiiig f-, tiuilMii'Cs. oi making I o„iis «>•' jltoutmns thereto, foi 0 .• ui • oiini«.ti'in with such tiadc, <«l’.<iti> hoMoess or piufession a ).lilt is III lA.stence and opera tion on said l.oid at the tune of ||<> iUupt.oo this reaolution »nd tdin.inri .••«) ihe inaetment of tiii.N u guUtiov met irstriction. I .«nu .'•■II,n ( OI dm • C. COMMtnCIAL DiSnUCT 111 the coni ’ • M'ial district, southi'sslci ty line of .laid Lad i t»midmgi iray be .•'•d and eroctod Four (4i III a point distant, ,,inmeri la) an i mercharsdia* Four Hundred (400i feet mii poses prov.ded that no soulhw»-sterl> fiofti the M>tit)i- , buildings may la- !.• - eafter erect- ly line of said County ,,, nn> of ihr following UM.-- or purposes fo any other UK- or piiitHM^e of 1 Kind and na-1 tuie 'initial to the fol..»wing uaca,! 01 purposes, there le tng no build- ing.H used *<>r my ul suth uaea oi .j purpoaea a' the time uf t!i« adop-; lion of this reaolution and ordl*' nance ; a Dance balla. pool halla, cir* f;-. |M| % m '4 Road No 19, thence south easterly puiallil wi’h the center tine of said County Road Nu 19 tu the point of intersection with the casteily line uf arction twenty (20) township one hundred s«‘ven- teen (117) range twenty-three (22) Hennepin County. Min nesota. thenee noitherly along the easterly line nf said section twenty t20i to the point of interMclinn with the t< center line of said County I Roed No. 10. them-e north- wraterly along the reniei Ime of Mid County Road No 19 to the point of Its intctsec- tion with the no'*thei |> lin« of said section twenty (20i thence weaterlv along the northerly line uf said section twenty (20) to the |M>ini uf tieginning RcaiDcirriAL di &tmict cuaea. b .Seaplane or amphibian baw or any facility fur tha operation inaintenancr- or stoiage of «iiciaft c. Uses or p irpoees which, in I flat ion !• oermitled use* of other piep i-i-i are noaioia or offensive itason of the emission uf d smoke, gas follies. vihrutii-t> .•! noiic CRYSTAL BAY DISTRICT Soctlon 111. DC 1*^ KUKTIIFH hfclSOI \ FI) .AND lUDAlNED. iM.i* *• '■lli wifii: J-I.I and dis- 1 In the r^aijenlial district. '‘ i-'*nship Iw. no building nr othei stru- tui* or '» improvement shall heiealtei be ^ •oninj’ di»’».^-t of the erected or used lor any purpose i't--’* A5fell® % -| other than residential purposes. W and for the purpose of providing buildings customarily usr-d in con- ' junction therewith t 2 No billboards or othei ad- vei tiling signi. displays or other signs of any kind shall be erer ted or maintained within said resi dential dutrid except signs (tear ing only the names of the resi dents of the diatf^ *1 and the naaaa of dwcllinfs therein, except afreet and road names and traffic signs, and except signs advertising lor Mie or rent, the pevrniacs on which they may be lifted, and except signs adverttsing'o«ch com mercial businaaa or busiiDtaccs as may exist la the said diatrict at' U m; k*ute i-f the a*i”|'i*uii ul U i>k ' resolution and ordinance and^ the | enMctment of tho irgulation | * Town of 1IImo. pMrs.Mnl to Ihr laws uf the State of Minnesota: to wit t. CryaJal Bay Diatrict That part uf s*‘Ctiona three OI. four (4). nine (9). ten tlOi and Aftren (IS) of Toveruhip one humirrd aeventeen (117) range twenty-thiee (23) Hen nepin County. Minnaaota. de- scribed as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the southerly line of aactlon three (3) township one hundred aeventeen (117) range twenty - three (23) Hennepin County, Hinneaota with the center line of the right of W4V •'( ihe Gieat Nuiiliein rKill • .•* 'hence nouth- ^e>U’ilv iihing (he irntrr line 'n.<1 raihoad light of W4> to I in* uf inteiNertiun wnh resti u tiun. 3 Niilhing herein containetl (l!4SKSUKt ^ •eistiu«-il '• p'Mhibil the use <i( :iii\ •-—»I 1,11 M,11 >< •'llt-r^i \\> m iiiiri iiain wiir | li e v..iiihwrB(et ly hru* of Audi- | Imi ■» SiilidiviMi.i'. .S’ l.••t>cl J-IS. 1 ih-nm-pin Couiilr Mnniwiis. i '.’id 'll. ex(eii«<>-i. Ihtieof , I* flu «■ '•■iith* .••ilei ■' ■ ' • • wrsteilv line of a«id Auditor' SoUlivisiMti N miiiIm I 3.SA th 'h.re of l.iiKi Nlimietonk.’ ih< ni I io iithvv i-'i . |v and auutt i‘i Iv along till ). lie of Lak .VIMi'i.‘tonka i.i the (lorthrri I le «>f the ili.miiel l**’lwee I. • ‘ •■! I :ike MiiiPetotika an t •' -tal H i\ . thenee westrri .1 ••Mg till ’.M. iherlv l.ne o( mi . I iimo'l ii- i;,e point of Its II i-t-M-nion A iMi the ei liter lii ••f the right r^f way of II iJie«t N M I t h e f n Hailroa- iiii-i.ee northew>li I ly along tl lenlei line ol li>e great Norll lO U-i'li'-td ••> the pi'int It' lolerM« lioi* with the ce: t« • 1 Me «'f C'ooiity Road N SI liieM-e westerly along tl (entei line f »aid Coun Hoitd N<i SI to the point of i inieiMM iiun with lh« center lii of County Road N»i 14; then n«.it)»eily. westeily and non cily ..long Ihe lentcr line 9aid County Itoad Nu. 84 to t point of intersrction with T eskierly extension of the tout riiy boundary of Lot Seven ( Auditoi'9 Siibd;vt»ion Numl 207. Hennepin County, Minr M>U thence weateily along ar ex tended line, and wetter V'l’therly and westerly alo ih- -Mutherly boundary line suiil lg)t Seven (7) Auditc S .Nilviaion No 307 to the ahi Inn- of StiihtM bay. Lake M Hell I ka. tlirnre n-irlherly, es eilv norOii’ily and northwc eriv along Mid nhort to ( pr.int uf interaeciion with ' norlh-w)U(h centri lint Of • ti.in Ave (S) township « hundred Keventcen (117t rai Iwenty-t)...... (2.1) Henne County Minnt’fota. thei nr-iihcilv along said center I to tlie point of intrrw’ction v the (.enter lino uf (he right way uf (he Minnesota West Kailniad. 'ilvu known aa l.iier line I iheiKW aaateily al the center line .*f Mid railr right of way to the point of lersecti.iii with tlie center of Courdv Hoad No 148; Uu KiHiiheiiy along taid renter ul said County Road Na 14 till’ pomi uf It* inteiacction * the .vMilhe’l) line ol aer I luce (’!' lown.siiip one hunt sevcnu->;n !lii langr twe tliiee c ’.3’ Hennepin Cou Minnesoii-. theme taitc along th«- Said li'ie of said tiun three (3) i.. the poirt lieginning .ind which said rnning dir 'hall t*e referred to as the Cn bay District. n- IT FURTHER RCSOL AND ORDAINED, that the lowing lilies, legulationa arx 'tiictiuns witli re()p(*rt to uv the lands and buildings w the above runing district aha aiiit are hereby adopted as lows |m wit s •n O I / __L. \ LX.J 'l3 33 3] nj :i}0) ~ ~ JLP P CD 1 >§ • •• ••'i o .“• O T O ro b ^ ^ ^z:Nm > rn ''V rnO fV)j>mr»O o > -Ti :d *11 :>r ^ I'l r> ^m x> c/) S r*r* 3J r~ -<-< mn: CO -< :xj ? SD :nmrns 'j;m SGornz1 1 oinp* H S 1 H >> r r > r r m G)m o io o 2 ”*i tj S3 O ozo 31.100 MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO larged, reconstructed or altered, and no structure or land shall be used for any purpose nor in any mariner which is not in conformity with the Zoning Code. f 31.100. Non-Conforming Uses. Any land or buildings which were actually and legally devoted to a non-conforming use on March 10, 1967, may be continued in saiu uon-conforming use pursuant to con ditional use permit granted pursuant to, subject to the following regula- tion*" md such land or buildings may not be; 31.101. Changed to another non-conforming use; 31.103. Re-established after voluntary* discontinuance of said use. such discontinuance having lasted for at least one year; 31.103. Extended in area. 31.104. No “junk yard” may continue as a non-conforming use under any circumstances. 31.110. Apply to “Uses” Only. The non-conforming use provisions of the Zoning Code apply only to the use to which land and b\iild- ings are put, and do not apply to situations where location or height of structures, lot size or other factors not involving the use of the premises prevent strict conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Code. Where, howe%'er, such a situation existed legally under the prior applicable law, the Council will not unreasonably require strict compliance and w'ill generally look with favor on granting of a variance under 32.300ff. 31.200. E.visting Lots. A lot of record existing upon Sept. 14, 1967 (the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single separate ownership in a “R” Residential District, which does not meet the requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may be utilized for a single family detached dw'elling purpose provided that in the judgment of the council such use does not adversely affect public health or safety. Single sep arate ownerships includes joint ownership by not more than two persons. 31.210. One Building per Lot. Except in the case of Planned Resi- 24 1-1-68 4 • • I- ■ m i;.' 4 ■ ;« j I t. ■I: i . •* ' JT f ■i dentia cipal t 3: or apr 3 shall princi 3 trict stable 3 Ing si barn, S shall thatl on tl perm or ac struc ed. a. l-l-€ 35.018 LAND USE 35. ZONING: CO.^DIEKCIAL DISTRICTS 35.000. IM: Commercial RtLsint ss Districts. 35.010. B-1: Permitted Uses. \Vithin any “B-1 ” Commercial Busi ness District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses. .35.011. Municipal Buildings. Municipal buildings where the use conducted is customarily considered to be an off.''e tue. 35.012, Private Oubs. Private clubs and lodges not operated for a profit. 35.013. Offices. Professional offices and offices of a general na ture. 35.014. Clinics. Clinics for human care. 35.015. .Mortuaries. Funeral homes and mortuaries. .3.5.016. Motels. Motels, motor hotels and hotels pro- -ed the site shall contain not less than 800 square feet of area per unit and provided the site has public sanitary sewer available. 35.017. Nurseries. Day nurseries and nursery schools provided not less than 40 square feet of outside play area per pupil is available and fenced. 35.018. Retail and Ser>ice Businesses. The following retail sales and service businesses: .\ppliance store, furniture store, upholstery shop, drapery shop, carpet store. ^ Art and school supply store, book and magazine store, office supply store, office machine store. 1-1-68 32-15 f J I • I ' li 35.020 ♦ MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO Bakcn*. delicatessen, grocerj’, meat market, fruit market, dairy store, vegetable market, frozen food locker, provided no killing is done on the site. Banks, loan couipany. insurance company, real estate office. Barber shop, beauty shop, health and physical culture center. Bowling alley, billiard hail, ice arena, archeiy range. Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen desserts and soft drinks, drive-in facilities. . .unera and photographic supply store, photographic studio, pic- * SJ • ' ming, florist shop, locksmith. ..^ly cleaning, shirt laundry, tail.<r shop, pressing and shoe shine, laundromats, laundry and cleaning pick-up stations. Garage for major auto repair, body and fender shop, car wash, mo tor fuel station, auto upholstery shop, auto painting, auto sales and auto parts store, provided the business is within a completely enclosed struc ture. Hardware store, variety store, garden store, fix-it shop. Hobby shop, gift store, glassware and pottery, antiques. Jewelry store, watch repair, radio, television and sound equipment repair and service. Library', museum, theater, record shop, music store, business school. News stand, tobacco shop, taxi stand, bus station, depot. Paint store, wallpaper store, floor covering, interior decorating, glass and mirror shop. Restaurant, cafe, tearoom. Shoe store, department store, dress shop, men’s store, wearine ap parel store. Radio and television studios. 35.020. B-1: ConditiomU Uses. Within the “B-1” Commercial Dis trict no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. 35.021. Nursing Homes. Nursing homes, rest homes or retire ment homes, provided the site shall contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for each person to be accommodated and that no build ing be located less than 30 feet from the side lot line; hospitals for human care, provided that all buildings be located not less than 25 feet from the lot line of any lot in an “R” District. 3.5.022. Studios. Art studio, interior decorating studio, music stu dio provided .o retail sales are made of products not manufactured on the site. .3? 16 1-1-68 A,/ P’ 35.032LAND USE35.023. Radio and T\\ Radio and tele\Tsion towers. 35.024. Schools. Private academies, schools, colleges and univer sities for teaching. 35.025. Galleries, etc. Historical buildings, museums, art institutes, galleries, and playhouses. 35.02G. .\ccess4iries. Accessory structures or uses other than those listed as permitted. 35.027. Parking. Off-street parking when the principal site of the off-street parking abuts on a lot which is in another “B” or “I” District and is in the same owTie.rship as the land in the “B” or “I” District and subject to those conditions as set forth in 3S.110 ff and other such conditions as found necessary by the Village Council. 35.028. Public Seiwices. Public service structures, including, but not limited to, buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electric power substa tions. 35.029. Research. Research Centers. I . a. 35.030. .Auto Lots. Open sales or storage lot provided that auto mobile lots are adjacent to and a part of a new car agency. 35.031. Halls. Armories, convention hall, sports arena, auction hall, roller rink, dance hall. 3 35.032. Drive-in Theatres. Drive-in theatre, provided the entrance driveway shall hold sufficient autos to equal 20fc of the capacity and the entrance and exits shall be on or within 200 feet of a major thoroughfare. The screen shall be so oriented that it will not be in view from the major thorouglifare and the property shall be adequately fenced. 1-1-68 32-17 35.033 MUMOPAL CODE OF ORONO 35.033. Trade Schckols. Trade schools when conducted within a completely enclosed structure. 35.034. Shops and \Varohous<?s. Electrical service, heating, plumb ing. sheet metal and air conditioning shops and warehousing to 6000 feet. 3.5.035. Monuments. Stone and monument sales. 3.5.036. Vets or Kennels. Animal hospital, clinic or kennels. 35.037. Boats and Bait Boat storage, docking, repairing, sales, rental and bait shops. ‘.1 35.038. Taverns. Tavern, cocktail lounge, liquor store. 35.039. Multiple Dwellings. Multiple dwellings. 35.040. B-1: Accessory Uses. Within any “B-1 ” Commercial Dis trict, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses. oJ.041. Garages, etc. Private garages, off-street parking and load ing spaces, as regulated in the Zoning Code. 35.043. Signs. Signs, as regulated in the Zoning Code. 35.043. Temporary Buildings. Buildings temporarily located for purposes of construction on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary to complete said construction. 35.044. Landscaping. Decorative landscape features. 35.045. Incidentals. Any incidental repair or processing neces sary to conduct a permitted principal use. 32-18 1-1-68 (Ord. 172. 12-15-74, effective 1-1-75) ^ I- fnrr^'na Uses Ahv land or buildincs which “ t^rd-^rlSinrure rsfort^l.^^^nted as hereinafter speci- (l^tnded ord. 172, 12-19-74. effective 1-1-75) 51.1C1. The no.-.-cor.fcrr.tnq use nay not be chanced to another (Aner.=?= Ore. 1/^. .^2-15-.-, e..eCwi\e * i /s; 31.102. :'°tf--i"=4''-,i^^'4°2'""rtion whei^aif"lecture is clacir.c cf a str-ctu.e ,^1 irsnector, providino the neces- declared unsafe by -.7e r'ore than 50 percent of the sary repairs s-s-* f „' ct ^uc-jre structure shall include structure or located aw.essw. • * ,c cicns, r.arcuees, monuments..p•-wron x-ne aciiu, -- "i” • -i i “7c\ lAj-endie ord. 172, i:-i:-7<. eiiectrve 1-1-/-) e. pe-.-.-c-’''ermine use of any structure 31.103. v:nfen any lav u. n.. ^ conforminr use, or land tr. ^•’^1' bS'^-nance'’'♦ o anv non-conform.nr use. liw-.endei Ore. 172, 12-19-74, eiiective .i 1 :,3 .:C4, IC.-.cnever ^a l--rLr";:-;-i:riSrt?%«rh'^aJl -r" .have 'be rKonstructed and used as before : :-.Z;.JScU-‘witr.in twelve (12) months after such 1. -w -fi'-........ ..... .V, buildinn or structure isur..es.- t.nc- wc -i-c *.2^ _>...V4.+ value•*.— •*nc* c#—r.v"* 1-^4. %»a 1 as'“r.ans\ ) or more of its fair nar)tet va I-cn^i'cn't.-.c as:-e^.nrc.ti -Sen^lishS* a^d^v^consbruction *>.ic- ^'.r.ir.m Code. .. . . n .»c\lLtlnded^OriV'"l7 2r 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) 31.105. -Vhenever a lawful a t«io “o£ or land is discontinued and renains '"^^^°"*^;"“uctGre or land twelve (12) months, any ■-f““ this Zoning Code.shall be in conforr-.ity vitn the nrosisions o. t (Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) n 106 An*' lawful non-conformina use of land not involvina a strictu^i, and im-'lawful non-confornino use tnvolvrng a Q f• ^ ( f,\' ^ 35.275. Drives. The design shall internal circuTation drives not less than 22 feet in width which are exclusive of the required parking area. 35.280. Curb Cuts. The driveway curb cuts to the develop ment shall not exceed 26 feet in width, 5 feet return curb radii, and be located net less than 60 feet from all intersecting streets. 35.261. Drainace. No land shall be developed-and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoi* causir.q floocs, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainace plans shall be submitted by the aool leant in suer, detail as required by the Council and these olans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer oefere submission to the Planning Comjr.ission anc Council for approval. Such runoff may be requirec to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether ontc acDacent prooertv or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surf ace* i’a ter Manaoer.ent Plan and shall be consistent with ether applicable regulations or ordinances a.nc subject to the approval of ether agencies naving juris- dictio.'i over the* area affected by the drainage. 35.262 . Fencinc. Wherever a Shopping Center^ Business District abuts or is across the street from a.n ’*R" District, an adequate fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 50% opaque nor less than 6 feet in heiaht shall be erected. When adjacent to a street, it snail not be less than 3 feet nor more than 4 feet in height. 35.263. Buildinc Design and Construction. See Section 35.C46. 35.2B4. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet in height except as provideo n 38.500. 3 5.3 C 0 . B-4; Office and Professional Business Disurict. 35.3C1. B-4i Purpose. The "B-4" Office and Professional Business is intended to* provide a district which is relatec to and may adjoin residential districts or ^ districts for the location of administrative office buila^igs and related offices. The office uses allowed in this distric are those in which there is limited contact with the public and no exterior display or selling of merchandise to the gen 5 V n have inediate access to adequate public. T.be district highways and public sanitary sewer. 35.3C2. District .s,. be relerrea to tbe Planning Cor-jnission for review. i^'i^-hin anv Office 35.310. B-4j_Pernittec Us|s» structure or land shall e^liprfor'^nrir "or; of^ihe following uses: . • Municipal buildings where 35.311. considered to be an rhe use conduc*-e3 is cus.opar.ii office use. •««ai offices and offices of35.312. Offices. Professional o.tiees a the cenerai nature. 15 3^3. Clinics. Clinics for hun.an care on an out- iatier.t bSTTi-S?:!!'. 3 5 • 314 .hanks and Insura nce G-a.ices _;_ 15 320. B-4:_ConditionaUf|e|. s^iil" and P^cfessional Busi.ness bv ‘co.nciticr.al use peir.lt: be used for the following cses a,.--.. t>, u, + Nursins hones, 35.321. !iailjJ£,Ji^^;°:r”r^tirei::5At hoa.es, provided hospitals, rest hones ®ban 60C square feet the site shaU "jor to be accommodated and that no.buUaInc ^e'looated less than 35 feet from tne sice lot line. . c vi-oic Private academies, schools, trade 'ih^fu, ISflitf and^niversities for teaching. 33.323. P*»«^^arch Centers. •sn;,r- Clinics or Kennels. Animal hospital, •js, 374. ^■n.f-p»^lnarv CJinics ux_- - --- -- Clinic or^kennTls. 35.325. Libraries. 35 326. Museums. ralla^ies. etc. Historical buildings, museun.s, institS«s- calleTTes and playhouses. ) « m0 35.328. Restaui:an::s j building located within ana display or advertising proviaing there is nw of the restaurant use. , . =*<-eet parking when the principal 35.329. parking. O.* abuts on a lot which is site of tJie^p^street ‘ri*^^ is in he sane owner- in another "5" or I „ district and subject ship as the land in the 3 or ^^her "" ""°r-i°io^^"arfounrL«ssary by bhe City Council, sucn conci U' - -- - - stations and electric power T1 i a. K s T> anv '*3“4” Offio® 35.34 0. B-_4j—— |-g^nls>rilf> the following uses shallProfessional Business Dis.net, bi pe^.^tted accessory uses: Any accessory use as regulated in the "8-1" District. 35.350. v-i. Area. Height■_D°UilgSa - and Design Peouirenients . _ - - - -l-he .ini^u^ Ict size Shau be 20,000 sauars feet. 35.352. not Kidth. The nininur, lot width shall be. 100 feet.' 35.353. rro.-.t yards. The .ihinum front yard shall be 20 feet. 35.354 . |Jon'a%iic ^^r;:rcrallei! a s^de^drivlway of 12 feet shall be provided to assure access. 4-e Nc building shall be 35.356. Se^^ck Recuireme ji^^nt' Une.'SS feet to nearer than 3= ‘Set 1 35 reUVo^^-\de iot line adlaoent ;""Cu??dlnrsba5l'L loss than 35 feet fret such lot line. >.. g- ( «: I. V “2 -fe r l‘i • ■ ' -^3.^ - ll/.f Ac. B>-3,<2:>ac p>*V - I. - -*/.'• -^e.7 - " ----- '"•'*3 . • • '•> . •• • • • ‘i*K • • • *J y< j't J<.... C » .r -¥.r 7 . - .■ »• •/.=.• »;rt.H,.. >.# •. t • t*v* :■ f ? *r • • -w ^ V■' i >• :*< i i f 16 } ■<* ’!i-'. <• I -liti -I S 10.42 L.Fencing. Wherever a "3-3" Shopping Center iTsi'lll, °an VdeVuafe'fen;; than 50% ooaque nor less than six feet in shall be erected. When adjacent to a street, it shall not be less than three feet nor niore than four feet in height. 3uilding Design and Construction. See Section 10.40, Subdivision 6, Subparagraph G. N Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. is across the street from SBC. 10.43 b-4 office and professional business district. Subd 1 Purpose. The "B-4" Office and Professional Business is intended to provide a distri^ct which is related to and mat, aH-inin residential districts or other business districts for the location of administrative office buildings and related offices. The office uses allowed in this district are those in w5’ch there is limited contact with the public and no exterior disDlav or selling of merchandise to the general public. The district shall have immediate access to adequate highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Application. All applications for a building oermit in any "B-4" Office and Professional District shall be n^iewed by the Council and may be referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any "B-4" Office and Professional Business District, no structure or land shall be usee except for one or more of the following uses: A. Municipal Buildings. Municipal buildings where the use conducted is customarily considered to be an office use. B. Offices. Professional offices and offices of the oeneral nature. ^^ C. Clinics. Clinics for human care on an out patient basis only. D. Banks and Insurance Offices. Subd. 4. Conditional Uses. Within the "B-4" Office and Professional Business District no structure or land shalx be usea for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Nursing Homes, Hospitals. ^ { hospitals, rest homes or retirement homes, provided the contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for to be accommodated and that no building be located less feet from the side lot line. ORONO CC 345 (4-1-84) 6- § 10.43 3. Schools. Private academieSr schools, trade schools, colleges and universities for teaching. hosoitals, c C. Research Centers. D. Vete-'inary Clinics linic or kennels. E. Libraries. F. Museums. or Kennels.Animal G. Galleries, Etc. Historical buildings, museums, art institutes, galleries and playhouses. H. Restaurants (Class I). Restaurants which are located within and mainly servicing an office building providing there is no outside display or advertising of the restaurant use. I. Parking. Off-street parking when the principal site of the off-street parking abuts on a lot which is in another "B" or "I” District and is in the same ownership as the land in the ”B" or "I” District and subject to those conditions as set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 4 and other such conditions as found necessary by the Council. J. Public Services. Public service structures, including, but not limited to, electrical transmission lines and buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electric power substations. Subd. 5. Accessory Uses. Within any "B-4 ” Office and Professional Business District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any accessory use as regulated in the "B-1 ” District. Subd. 6. Area, Height, Lot Width, Yard, Setback and Design Requirements. A. Area. The minimum lot size shall be 20,000 B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be 100 C. Front Yards. The minimum front yard shall be 20 square feet, feet. feet. D. Rear Yards. The minimum rear yard shall be 30 feet and unless the rear yard has access from a public, street or alley, a side driveway of 12 feet shall be provided to assure access. ORONO CC 346 (4-1-84) CITY OF ORONO notice n" cmrjw ^ OPCNO 1. 2. reviewing the foIIowii:g land use applications. «0.3 B.:.. Saoner the ow-the^rty^ 3131 >o-^ =-^covet wltMn the T3-350- sethaelc atea. ^ #2024 James Wilson has ^ for residential use, a use Lydiard Avenue that =‘“° jj ,o„ted in the B-4, Office and Professio^ ButtrDir=n"ph^^^^^^^ pro7oses maintaining his accounting business withm the same strucmre. •ST, s™ " r2.M “ .1 ««««•• •» • hinn to be heard will appear at this meeting. Wriaen comments are solicited. ^i^'SHvIilable in the City Offices for review, by appomtment. 3. 4. 5. City of Orono 3v: Planning Commission ^4 47^ A ^ganne a 7 Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator *i ^ • r*r «* t *. « « » • » « % % * -1 « «•' ‘S- n\vr> H u> SOUTU \BOOO Wmi te:;M i97!trYr. nS'v Vi>jr«T VT^ >.Lyc^/ar<y Avenue in O 153 8F II56I9 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A. 5' "v DATE: June22, \. ITEM NONO.: / Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2027 Richard Lee Kail. 3753 Casco Avenue - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC Lot area = 15.645 s.f. or .36 acres Lot coverage = 2,354 s.f. or 15% Brief Review of Application Applicant seeks approval of an area variance that would allow the construction of a new residence on the property that lacks the required half acre in area. A residence has existed on this property for over 50 years. Applicant seeks no other variances with the proposal. The lot is 92 ’ in width and per Section 10.03, Subd. 16 (A-1) only 80’ would be required. Review Exhibits F and K, a designated wetland encroaches the property at the southwest comer. Upon application for a building permit, applicant has been asked to provide an updated survey locating the designated wetland. This will have no impact on the buildable area as property is sewered and applicant can seek credit for the wetland area. Review Exhibit C, the majo.ity of the development mnoff will drain directly to the ponding area located on the City property to the immediate south. Applicant notes all existing improvements that encroach into the public unimproved right-of-way to the east will be removed. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the lot area variance to allow the construction of a new residence on this property, subject to the conditions set forth in the staff memo dated June 8, 1995. The enclosed appioval resolution has been irafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either deny, approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRAN TING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 2027 WHEREAS, Richard Lee Kail (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lots 7 and 8. Block 4, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a property that consists of 15,645 s.f. or .36 acres where the zoning district would require 21,780 s.f. and where existing lots of record would be required to meet 17,424 s.f. or .4 acre or 80%. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2027. The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one-half acre in area. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 1995 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. A single family residence has existed on the property for over 50 years. B. The property is ser\ed with municipal sewer and water. C. There is no adjacent land available to acquire except for the 14* unimproved public alley to the east. If alley were to be vacated, applicant would receive 1,253 s.f. of additional area. Page 1 of 4 D. Existing improvements on the property encroach into the public right-of- way. E. The existing strucnire is located 18’ from the street lot line where a 30’ setback is required. F. The existing strucnire is located 0’ from the east side lot line where a 10’ setback is required. G. The subject property is consistent with the size and width of other adjacent properties in the immediate neighborhood. H. The new construction will have no impact on residential development as all drainage will drain directly to a ponding area on land owned by City to south and west. 4. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Oreno City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a property that does not meet the required ^ea for the zomiig district and grants a variance of 6,135 s.f. or 28% (per Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 (A-1), variance of 1,779 s.f. or 10%), subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 4 1 . Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide a survey locating designated wetland at the southwest comer and proposed house. Applicant shall also provide detailed grading and drainage plans. 2. The concrete pad located within public alley to be removed prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction. 3. Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of both the garage and house. The Building staff shall determine if detached garage can remain during the period of constmction of new residence. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 7, applicant may apply for a permit from the City that will allow applicant to reside in the existing residence for a three-month period. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 26, 1996). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of June, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Propertv Owner (s) Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________ . known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBUC On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared______________________________^__________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 4^- To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:June 8, 1995 Subject: #2027 Richard Lee Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Lot area = 15,645 s.f. or .36 acres Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A-1) - Lots of one acre or less that meet 80% of the lot width and lot area requirements may be developed without Council approval. 2. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Required area. LR-IC requires 21,780 s.f. or '/i acre. 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 (A-1) A. Required = 17,424 s f. or .4 acres (80%) Existing = 15,645 s.f. or .36 acres Variance = 6,135 s.f. or 28% (variance = 1,779 s.f. or 10% per 80% standard) B Lot width. LR-IC requires 100’. 4.Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A-1). Required = 80’ Existing = 92’ No variance required. 5.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. 500-1,000 setback area = 15,645 s.f. Allowed = 5,476 s.f. or 35% Existing = 1,868 s.f. or 11.93% Proposed = 3,923.2 s.f. or 25.07% No variance required.< Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A-2) - Credit of wetlands as property is sewered. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners’ List Zoning File #2027 June 8, 1995 Page 2 C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Inventory E - Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Form F - Survey G - Site Plan H - Elevations I - First Floor Plan J - Second Floor Plan K - Wetlands Map Description of Request Applicant proposes construction of a two-story residence and the razing of the existing home located 18’ from the street lot line. Note portions of the existing improvements encroach the 14’ alley to the east (review Exhibit F). Review Exhibit G, the applicant has advised that the rear deck shown on the site plan at 9’ from the side lot line will be altered to meet the 10’ setback. Applicant will locate new construction at the mid-point of the lot, taking advantage of the steeper elevations for a rear walkout design. The City Engineer will be asked to review the grading plans with building permit to ensure there will be no greater impact of increased runoff upon drainage retention area to the south. Note drainage all flows to the southwest comer of property. Applicant will reside in the residence during construction. The building staff will be consulted to see if the detached garage will have to be removed during the process of construction. The survey has not designated the wetland area to the southwest of the property, but as property is sewered this area may be credited against lot area. Statement of Hardship or Unique Findings A single family residence has existed on the property for over 50 years and the property is served with municipal sewer and water. There is no additional land available to acquire except for the 14’ alley to the east. If the alley were to be vacated, applicant would receive approximately 1,253 s.f. of additional area (7 x 179). 1. 2. 3.Current improvements on the property encroach the alley and do not meet current setback standards. All new construction will meet all other required zoning standards. Zoning File #2027 June 8, 1995 Page 3 4.Review Exhibit C, the subject property is consistent with the size and width of other adjacent properties in the immediate neighborhood. 5.New construction will have no impact on residem-al development as all drainage will drain directly to a ponding area on land owned by City to south and west. Options of Action To either deny or approve the area variance application for Richard Lee Kail for the property located at 3753 C isco Avenue. If you choose to approve the variance application, the following conditions shouid ^ included in that recommendation: 1. 2. 3. 4. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide a survey locaung de^gnated wetland and proposed house. Applicant shall also provide detailed grading and drainage plans. The concrete pad located within public alley to be removed prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction. Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of both the garage and house, llie Building staff shall determine if detached garage can remain during the period of construction. Per Section 10.03. Subdivision 7, applicant may apply for a permit from the City staff that will allow applicant to reside in the existing residence for a three-mon period. 4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION •• *'“*'*», Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming strucmres $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INTOR-MATION Site Address .i' a . • 4 X/ 0 ^ ^ m •- .. one rvuuieoa ^ ^ ^ ^ f i —a----------------- ^ Propem' Identification Number (P.I.D ) pO--------- Attach legal description to application if not mcluded on require survev. Date Property Acquired __P (uaie rropenv rwuL|uiiww ____________—----------------- --------------- I (do) (do not) also own the ^djacent parcels ot land. Present use'^property; residential -----other (specify)_ Zoning District:____________________________________ (month/year) applicant , ^ Name GCcUiV/l L^c Address: ^ Phone (home) ^"7 / - __ Phonetwork) '~1^ ~)^^2oo ^ Jj-:> City: I A>i yr<;-/<A _____Zip: rs\£j.----- OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name ___________________ Phone(home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimaied Constnjction Cost $ liO Ot». DosT^reqlVindetaU: ^ ^n..<r c/x k :(I c o^-r .p ----------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary ) VARIANCES required tX Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) compliance with Zoning Code requirements. (attach additional sheets if necessary) II 00^‘t i. 2 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS > n .f .H. fnn»u.n. infnr.in.ion must hesufemittert hv the application Headline date in order for vniir applifation to h«> rnnsidered completej ^:r'"fn— He^Jiepin Counw Depanmem of Finance, A-603, Gov, Center, 348-a2,l). ^ Plat Map (obtained surveyor) and include hardcover^Cenificaie of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor “calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 A U reproduction. Dconosed elevations) if any changes in existing grade' ^ :rpSS5'"s:rirr™... you wish notified of this application. 9 __Additional items as may be requested by City statt. Jit“=,.s~ "r ir.ri.'cr;;'T tafoLbon supplied is .me and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature /<^----------^ate ----- ?h“er®here';y Sedges and agrees to this application and further Intty 1 “ the property by City suff. consultants, apnu Commtsston members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature L. IAS}_Date Applicant must have all submihals into the City offices «<lays before the Placing Conumsbon ?o have an am« abend in your place and to advise Ute Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 RUN DATE 04/21/9$ BATCH SOI HErff4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST < PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 03730 CASCO AVE H H SULLIVAN ETAL N H SULLIVAN 3730 CASCO AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 3B 20-117-23 31 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGTIED DEAN V 6REIHANN DEAN V 6REIHANN 3779 CASCO AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 9V& A&13R NA.iS Ta ^^A/ER NAME/ADDR 3S 20-117-23 31 0015 00038 ADDRESS UUSSIC^D HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAI4D CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/62 ST DEED 161146 PROP ADDR 01I4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 31 0067 02068 CASCO POIf4T RD CHARLES F NELSOf4 A HIFE CHARLES I LUCY NELSON 2668 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 V REPORT NO. PAGE PI4354011 . U ■50 Z0*U7-Z3 0008 38 20-117-23 24 0010 ♦0 38 20-117-23 24 0018 . A . . »V-4 V* * *PROP ADDR 0275S CAROLir4C Avc 02740 ETHEL AVE ■f•• • f 02765 ETHEL AVE0NT4ER NAME N J RUDE ADA RUDE L L VIC»^NAIR A A L VICKNAIR •NEVA L NXLLXAMS TAXPAYER NENDELL J RUDE LANCE L A RHOOA L VICKNAIR ^ fe % %NEVA L NILLIAMS • ♦ ‘ • .A ^ NAME/ADDR 2735 CAROLINE AVE 2740 ETHEL AVE * /\ . *9 2765 ETHEL AVE s% NAYZATA MN 55391 NAYZATA MN 55391 t > A- y r'.•# 'f* '•A. • r , NAYZATA MN 55391 / • *1 *38 20-117-23 31 0003 38 20-117-23 31 0009 • i 38 20-117-23 31 0010 • * • • ‘ > r*, « ' « •I ^1 ■ ;,;w 03753 CASCO AVE PTCHARO L RAIL RICHARD L RAIL 3753 CASCO AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 03759 CASCO AVE BRUCE D MADDEN ETAL BRUCE D MADDEN 3759 CASCO AVENUE NAYZATA MN 55391 .. .-9 •* •• I ' { » 38 20-117-23 51 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGT^D MENr4EPIN FORFEITED LAfO CITY OF ORONO * LOCAL POT4Dir4G AREA 9/5/80 ST DEED 158897 i » :* •>r •5 I * 38 20-117-23 31 0058 03721 CASCO AVE D R NELTY I N H JIN D R NELTY I H H JIN 3721 CASCO AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 ' «• • r ) 38 20-117-23 31 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161146 V I .V 38 20-117-23 31 0062 02740 CAROLINE 'AVE S L I J N ROSSTEOT SCOTT A JANET ROSSTEOT 2740 CAROLINE AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 r • - • 5:I (t TOTAL BATCH I •j*; 501 00013 r « t \.s; A f . f J' /• • '* ! . ‘f •»• *. 4.n *• • .9 I 1 » • Vr 1 j- I i • >. r I't . . . i’ll •. '1*•• -V • I*;'. •- ■< .i;*\ * f s % * * . 6 . '• J • . .. •. * • . • -1 V. • * k.* ■3' •f J, 'it * • » • .• > -i. . • . . • * . V ••. •' .* .; • r .. % v» ••' * V*«. ' -'fi*.** j) > : .... • ; .. . rI-^ • I ^ % 9 W *.. ’ * «.i • ^ r V » •’. •*- "V '• *.: i4.- o '»kt ? • 4 RUN DATE 04/21/95BATCH 501 ■# • . ".f.! »■1 •’ , d .!• r- % • i. 4i tHEI«ffPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEHPROPERTY OI«CRS LIST ,♦ %V*1 t'REPORT NO. P14SS401 PAGE 2UAfii* * •Iv ' * . . f • t S .'A •.# K .'«r * V / p'^» . •• “ 5.7 ' . '. • . •- . • ' J t- • •-. V f ■■ » . i jd r i •if •i'' r-l:I I * >; r t I • f V 4 •IJ ^ ..*• I *> f? T -.1 ^■i .‘.•A I* • * * A * • •••■ ‘ ^ V‘. S. 4 ' '. V . ■• I ' J " « •’7 » • > A’ ‘4 ■.«: 1 , • --rk ^ •'•if* ri'*''* ■ ■ I . 'I • • It r«« ii'’'■ '^ .C.. ., -i . .•> •; .- /> . 3 . •-, 4 •*•• '• u *.> ■ • ^ •'•iVl -I' *** • 1 »I '. ■ r? jJ>n • . ■; . •>: 'W ;; '.V c- ••:f' i: ti * ■^‘ • I I • •• ^ I •v . r • • V • * L • • • « • . ' ?!• '•» ,* T t. V M . < ■ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPEBTY TA)UTIQN» TO THE BEST OF HY KN0NLED6E AND BELIEF. ,ms,•\. 't* ■ft DATE VII' n.’ ,v 7f *'■1¥ 11 I ■■»ft? j'- - ' • * » j 5, sv ;• ■■ I ’ '"' ' '•*fcPvT • ■•• •.■ .’in. .•-. ' -iv ’ ■>? ;iif • I. ' • t • < ' • * 1 = • ’. ^ V ■* J v /'.'' ^ ■ 1 ■ • i' -•• *•*• i *• .I-..!./:•> , V’-. ♦ * f • *» f * - \AiA GOVT LOT 5 4 H I »•> RVRDCOVTR CALCUL^^N WO^SHEET ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING hardcove r IN ZONE // 75-250’250-500’500-1000 ’ A. House ^'2 Length 2L Width X \ X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic :: ^ / \ \ \ \ \ \ X X X /t>( G. Other total h.ardcover in zone TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE PROPOSED hardcover IN ZONE A. House ^(n'_______ Length ^ B IS~ X 100 0?.r X __ Width fO B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic '5^2. m It) 22o U. X X N 3 G. Other total HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B )<T./,S5-.3^ X 100 <-/6i ' _ S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. 71C 18 ML' iO / n+- / Eod. 6^ ?V7.g S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3225-^—s*"-_l£3il£23__ S.F. OS~.0 7TTr A B 19- oa A B 77 I • A ■J /c? Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form ofI (we) 9)uc.'f .^ /^']I^VP{ [print name(s)l 1 9 Co:^ f c: (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the propertv' or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. 2. 2.7 s Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner ♦♦♦♦♦♦■ti********************************************* I (we) /^.y»A^. f M r.) Qi -^7^/ [print address][print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located m also referred to as Land Use Application No.________• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner DateProperty Owner If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. r ( OF LOTS * LEGAL DBS( Lots 7 an< This surv o£ the ab location concrete to. show a ments. 4 ’ rxngs U — n' t R OF LO LEGAL Lots 7 This F of the locati conerc to she ments. rii lit » -^IJ SCAJL-G. V,V- I'-O gl6-MT'EUETVATTIQW;^ scALg 1 •; I*;*, • •I. i * :» ; • / •: .1 •!• \\ M. / •^ » SI. __ r+- • «« • •• • * • r—t r ■lr • 1“ e^le:^ /.-• - t ' o u sr.Aj_E '!^'\ I’-o" /\zJ i X (i I -'I s: U 1 .«• » \ » j;^ I :‘i 'i!! . ♦ I •I \i? t' ft j !• 0 \>\ *>s D * I mm fV? ’-'J' '‘A<’ ■'■:rT>^•V>'>v^^L:'^-;:.^y ‘t tf ;v-" -v , .. Ar'v '; -V '/>^w 9 TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Glenn Cook, City Engineer Steve Weekman. On-Site Systems Manager I lib U JUN 2 6 1995 CITY Of ORONO FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:June 22, 1995 SUBJECT: Neighborhood Meetings - Potential Sewer Areas - Confirm Dates Because Met Council staff have indicated they are currently only approving MUSA amendments for projects through the year 2000. it is appropriate that staff meet as soon as possible with each of the 10 neighborhoods identified for possible sewer installation. From these meetings staff would hope to identify which neighborhoods might request sewer in the next 5 years. Additionally, it is appropriate to meet with tlie high priority North Long Lake, Long Lake Country Club and Orono Orchards neighborhoods to discuss the City s willingness to proceed with sewer installation as soon as possible to avoid the need for multiple holding tanks as deadlines for septic system upgrades draw nearer. Staff has tentatively scheduled dates for 4 separate public information meetings, inviting different neighborhoods or groups of neighborhoods to each meeting. (Note that CouncUmember Goetten and I met with the Webber Hills neighborhood on May 17th; also that we anticipate a separate meeting with the Bracketts Point residents in their neighborhood at their request - the date for this is still pending - see Tom Crosby ’s suggested letter and my redraft). Long Lake Country Club & North Long Lake Wed. July 12 Orono Orchards Thurs. July 20 Edgewood Hills/Fox Ridge/East Long Lake Thurs. July 27 Foxhill & Bayridge/Hartwood Thurs. Aug. 3 For each of the public information meetings, it would be our intent to have the followmg present- Gaffron, Weekman. Gerhardson, Cook, Moorse, and one or more Councilmem^re. TTie format of the meetings would be a presentation by staff of background and results of the moratorium study with a question and answer period. Our hope is to provide enough information for each neighborhood to determine whether they will request sewer m the near future. Council Action Requested Please review the suggested meeting dates and advise of any conflicts. Also, comment and suggest any appropriate changes to the draft letters attached. VVHO; WHAT: WHY: MEETING NOTICE AND CsTITATION Residents of "North Long Lake" and "Long Lake Country Club" Neighborhoods (see map) Public Information Meeting WHEN: Wednesday, July 12. 1995, 7:00 p.m. WHERE: Orono CouncU Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway Possibility of Municipal Sewer Installation Why Are Municipal Sewers Being Considered? State of Minnesota septic system regulations and Orono ordinances require that nonconforming septic systems be brought up to code within 2 years of identification. It is estimated that as many as 50% of Orono ’s existing septic systems are nonconforming by State standards and will have to be replaced. Typically, new mound type drainfield systems will be required, at a cost of $7,000-10,000 for the average home. During 1994 the City placed a moratorium on requiring replacement of nonconforming systems, and conducted a study to determine if there are neighborhoods in Orono which should be provided with municipal sewer rather than upgrading their septic systems. This snidy took into account the age, design and condition of existing septic systems, as well as the availability of area on each lot for system replacement. "North Long Lake" and "Long Lake Country Club" are two of 10 neighborhoods identified where small lot sizes (typically smaller than 2 acres), proximity to lakeshore or other factors suggest that municipal sewer may be preferable to long term septic system usage. Within your neighborhoods, it is estimated that 70% of the existing septic systems will need to be upgraded. How Much Would Sewer Cost? Over the past fifteen years, municipal sewer has been extended to a number of individual Orono neighborhoods with conditions similar to those in your neighborhood. The cost of providing sewer to those neighborhoods ranged from $10,CKX) to $25,(X)0 per dwelling unit. In the most recent projects the City assisted by paying a portion of that cost for the benefited property owners. The Citv Ensineer’s preliminary cost estimate to serve your two neighborhoods with sewer is S421,5(X) fo^North Long Lake (about $13,600 per dwelling unit) and $411,700 for Long Uke Country Club (about $19,600 per dwelling unit). Because the City is not in a position to assist in the costs to serve all 10 identified neighborhoods, a priority has been assigned to each neighborhood. Priority is based on the magnimde of existing problems, the number of systems which will likely have to be replaced, as well as the technical feasibility of replacing systems when required. North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club have been rated as the City’s highest priority neighborhoods for sewer installation. A joint sewer project may be the most cost-effective way to irve both neighborhoods. Because of the high priority, some City financial participation is anticipated to help in defraying the project costs. How Does Sewer Fit Into Orono ’s Overall ’’Comprehensive Plan ”? All 10 identified neighborhoods are within Orono’s designated "rural" (unsewered) area. However, these neigh^rhoods are each somewhat unique, having relatively small lot sizes or being adjacent to ^lake. And each neighborhood was developed prior to the 1975 zomng changes which required a 2-acre minimum for rural lots, to accommodate septic systems. The City is currently working with the Metropolitan Council to obtain approval for extending municipal sewer to all 10 neighborhoods, which requires amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and MUSA (Metropolitan Urban i-rvice Area) boundary. Please come to the public information meeting on Wednesday, July 12th. Results ^the smdy as it relates to your neighborhoods will be presented, and City representatives will be availab to answer questions. You are invited and encouraged to attend. We want to hear your views regarding the possible installation of municipal sewer m your neighborhood. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron at 473-7357. Enc. - Area Map WHO: WHAT: WHEN: WHY: MEETING NOTICE AND INVITATION Residents of "Orono Orchards" Neighborhood (see map) Public Information Meeting Thursday, July 20, 1995, 7:00 p.m. WHERE: Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway Possibility of Municipal Sewer Installation Why Are Municipal Sewers Being Considered? State of Minnesota septic system regulations and Orono ordinances require that nonconforming septic systems be brought up to code within 2 years of identification. It is estimated that as many as 50% of Orono’s existing septic systems are nonconforming by State standards and will have to be replaced. Typically, new mound type drainfield systems will be required, at a cost of $7,000-10,000 for the average home. During 1994 the City placed a moratorium on requiring replacement of nonconforming systems, and conducted a study to determine if there are neighborhoods in Orono which should be provided with municipal sewer rather than upgrading their septic systems. This study took into account the age, design and condition of existing septic systems, as well as the availability of area on each lot for system replacement. Orono Orchards is one of 10 neighborhoods identified where small lot sizes (typically smaller than 2 acres), proximity to lakeshore or other factors suggest that municipal sewer may be preferable to long term septic system usage. Within your neighborhood, it is estimated that 35% of the existing septic systems will need to be upgraded. How Much Would Sewer Cost? Over the past fifteen years, municipal sewer has been extended to a number of individual Orono neighborhoods with conditions similar to those in your neighborhood. The cost of providing sewer to those neighborhoods ranged from $10,0(X) to $25,(XX) per dwelling unit. In the most recent projects the City assisted by paying a portion of that cost for the benefited property owners. The City Engineer’s preliminary cost estimate to serve your neighborhood with sewer is $304,000 (about $13,800 per dwelling unit). Because the City is not in a position to assist in the costs to ser\e all 10 identified neighborhoods, a priority has been assigned to each neighborhood. Priority is based on the magninide of existing problems, the number of systems which will likely have to be replaced, as well as the technical feasibility of replacing systems when required. Orono Orchards is rated as the City ’s second highest priority for sewer installation. City financial assistance to help defray the cost of a sewer project in your neighborhood may be possible in a few years when the highest priority areas have been completed. How Does Sewer Fit Into Orono’s Overall "Comprehensive Plan"? All 10 identified neighborhoods are within Orono’s designated "rural" (unsewered) area. However, these neighborhoods are each somewhat unique, having relatively small lot sizes or being adjacent to a lake. And each neighborhood was developed prior to the 1975 zoning changes which required a 2-acre minimum for rural lots, to accommodate septic systems. The City is currently working with the Metropolitan Council to obtain approval for extending municipal sewer to all 10 neighborhoods, which requires amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) boundary. Please come to the public information meeting on Thursday, July 20th. Results of the study as it relates to your neighborhoods will be presented, and City representatives will be available to aruwer questions. You are invited and encouraged to attend. We want to hear your views regarding the possible installation of municipal sewer in your neighborhood. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron at 473-7357. Enc. - Area Map MEETLNG NOTICE AND INVITATION VVHO: Residents of "Foxhill" and "Bayridge/Hartwood" Neighborhoods (see map) WHAT: WHEN: WHERE: WHY: Public Information Meeting Thursday, August 3, 1995, 7:00 p.m. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway Possibility of Municipal Sewer Installation Why Are Municipal Sewers Being Considered? State of Minnesota septic system regulations and Orono ordinances require that nonconforming septic systems be brought up to code within 2 years of identification. It is estimated that ^ many as 50% of Orono’s existing septic systems are nonconforming by State standards and wUl have to be replaced. Typically, new mound type drainfield systems will be required, at a cost of $7,000-10,000 for the average home. During 1994 the City placed a moratorium on requiring replacement of nonconforming systems, and conducted a study to determine if there are neighborhoods in Orono which should be provided with municipal sewer rather than upgrading their septic systems. This smdy twk mto Lcount the age. design and condition of existing septic systems, as well as the availabUity of area on each lot for system replacement. Your neighborhoods, identified as "Foxhill" and "Bayridge/Hartwood" are two of 10 neighborhoods identified where small lot sizes (typically smaller than 2 acres), proximity to lakeshore or other factors suggest that municipal sewer may be preferable to long term septic system usage. Within your neighborhoods, it is estimated that 45% of the existing septic systems will need to be upgraded. How Much Would Sewer Cost? Over the past fifteen years, municipal sewer has been extended to a number of individual Orono neighborhoods witli conditions similar to those in your neighborhood. The cost of providmg sewer to those neighborhoods ranged from $10,000 to $25,000 per dwelling unit. In the m^t recent projects the City assisted by paying a portion of that cost for the benefited property owners. The City Engineer ’s preliminary cost estimate to serve the Foxhill neighborhood with sewer is $318,280 (about $14,470 per dwelling unit). The estimate for service to just the 8 homes on Bayridge Road is $150,000 (or $18,750 per unit). An estimate for bringing service to the Hartwood neighborhood (south of Bayridge) is being completed. (Hartwood was suggested as a logical extension of the Bayridge project after the engineer ’s original estimates were completed). Because the City is not in a position to assist in the costs to serve all 10 identified neighborhoods, a priority has been assigned to each neighborhood. Pnority is based on the magnimde of existing problems, the number of systems which will likely have to be replaced, as well as the technical feasibility of replacing systems when required. Foxhill and Bayridge/Hartwood are rated as two of the four lowest priority areas for sewer installation as compared to other more critical areas. City financial assistance to help defray the cost of a sewer project in your neighborhoods will likely not be possible until the higher pnority areas have been served, which is likely to be at least ten years m the future. Council has therefore chosen to not place your neighborhood on a definite timetable for municipal sewer installation, and has advised that your neighborhood should expect to individually upgrade septic system as required. However the Council has also indicated that if 100% of an individual neighborhood peiitjons fnr «^wer\nd agrees to nav the full cost, sewer installation could be commenced in the relatively near future, thereby avoiding the costly replacement of septic systems. How Does Sewer Fit Into Orono’s Overall "Comprehensive Han"? All 10 identified neighborhoods are within Orono’s designated "rurar (unsewered) area. However these neighborhoods are each somewhat unique, having relatively small lot sizes or being adjacent to a lake. And each neighborhood was developed prior to the 1975 zomng changes which required a 2-acre minimum for rural lots, to accommodate septic systems. The City is currently working with the Metropolitan Council to obtain approval for extending mur vyil sewer to all 10 neighborhoods, which requires amendment of ine Comprehensive Plan ana MX 'iA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) boundary. Please come to the public information meeting on Thursday, August 3rd. Results of the study as it relates to your neighborhoods will be presented, and City representatives will be avaUable to answer questions. You are invited and encouraged to attend. We want to hear your views regarding the possible installation of municipal sewer in your neighborhood. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron at 473-7357. Enc. - Area Map WHO: WHAT: \IEETESG NOTICE AND INVITATION Residents of "Edgewood Hills", "Fox Ridge" and "East Long Lake Neiehborhoods (see map) Public Information Meeting WHEN: Thursday, July 27, 1995, 7:(X) p.m. WHERE: Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway WHY: Possibility of Municipal Sewer Installation Why Are Municipal Sewers Being Considered? State of Minnesota septic system regulations and Orono ordinances require Uiat septic systems be brought up to code within 2 years of identification. It is est^ted that many as 50% of Orono’s existing septic systems are nonconforming by State stand^s and wil have to be replaced. Typically, new mound type drainfield systems wiU be required, at a cost of $7,000-10,000 for the average home. During 1994 the City placed a moratorium on requiring replacement of nonconforming systeim, and conducted a study to determine if there are neighborhoods m Orono whitn should provided with municipal sewer rather than upgrading their septic systems This took mto account the age, design and condition of existing septic systems, as well as the availability o area on each lot for system replacement. Edgewood Hills, Fox Ridge and East Long Lake are three of 10 neighborhoods identified where small lot sizes (typically smaller than 2 acres), proximity to lakeshore or other that municipal rewer may be preferable to long term septic system usage. Wito your neighborhoods, it is anticipated that a significant percentage of the existmg septic^'stenu rwy need to be upgraded, although this need has not yet been thoroughly evaluated three neighbourhoods are not adjacent to the lake and are outside the defined "Shoreland distnct. How Much Would Sewer Cost? Over the past fifteen years, municipal sewer has been extended to a number of individual Orono neighborhoods with conditions similar to those in your neighborhood. The cost of sewer to those neighborhoods ranged from SIO.OOO to $25,000 per dwelling umt_ In the m«t recent projects the City assisted by paying a portion of that cost for the benefited property owners. The City Engineer’s preliminary cost estimate to serv’e your neighborhoods with sewer is $84,000 for ^gewood Hills (about $12,000 per dwelling unit); $208,500 for Fox Ridge (about $29,800 per dwelling unit); and $223,500 for East Long Lake (about $22,350 per unit). Because the City is not in a position to assist in the costs to serve all 10 identified neighborhoods, a priority has been assigned to each neighborhood. Priority is based on the magnitude Df existing problems, the number of systems which will likely have to be replaced, as well as me technical feasibility of replacing systems when required. Your three neighborhoods are rated as mid-to-low-range priority for sewer installation. City financial assistance to help defray the cost of a sewer project in your neighborhood will likely not be possible until the higher priority areas have been served, which is likely to be at least five to ten years or more in me fumre. The Council has therefore chosen to not place your neighborhoods on a definite timetable for municipal sewer installation, and has advised that your neighborhoods should expect to individually upgrade septic systems as required. However, the Council has indicated mat if 1(X)% of an individual neighborhood petitions foc sewer and agrees to pav the entire cost, sewer installation could tie commenced in the relatively near future, thereby avoiding the costly replacement of septic systems. How Does Sewer Fit Into Orono ’s Overall "Comprehensive Plan"? All 10 identified neighborhoods are within Orono’s designated "nirar (unsewered) area. However, these neighborhoods are each somewhat unique, having relatively small lot sizes or being adjacent to a lake. And each neighborhood was developed prior to the 1975 zoning changes which required a 2-acre minimum for rural lots, to accommodate septic systems. The City is currently working wim me Metropolitan Council to obtain approval for extending municipal sewer to all 10 neighborhoods, which requires amendment of me Comprehensive Plan and MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) boundary. Please come to the public information meeting on Thursday, July 27m. Results of me study as it relates to your neighborhoods will be presented, and City representatives will be available to answer questions. You are invited and encouraged to attend. We want to hear your views regarding the possible installation of municipal sewer in your neighborhood. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron at 473-7357. Enc. - Area Map City Re-Draft 6-23-95 (Residents of Bracketts Point) Dear In 1994 the City of Orono inspected each of the septic systems serving the residences on Bracketts Point and several adjacent residences on County Road 15. This inspection included tests to determine the conformity of each system with City and State codes. A majority of systems on Bracketts Point were deemed to be nonconforming. In accordance with current Orono ordinances, all nonconforming systems must be brought up to existing codes not later than the enc' 1996. Some of the work requirejl ttj bring the systems up to code may be substantial, indudmg system replacement in r.^( f.c a three foot separation from the seasonal high water table. This often requires the use c ’ - mound" system, at a cost of $7-10,000 or more. In a recent study, the City identified Bracketts Point as one of 10 neighborhoods where installation of municipal sewer may be appropriate in the long run. The City ,^"8»*jeer has estimated the cost of bringing sewer to Bracketts Point at $247,240 or approximately $17,700 per unit However, Bracketts Point ranks relatively low in priority for sewer service as compared to most of the other neighborhoods, which have smaller lots and in some cases no feasible location for replacement of their systems. The City will soon be making an application to the Metropolitan Council for approval to bring sewer service to all 10 neighborhoods. In the case of Bracketts Point, actual sewer construction is unlikely to occur until the higher priority areas have been served, which is expected to take ten years or longer. The City Council has noted that a petition for sewer by 100% of the landowners in any of these neighborhoods may be sufficient to result in sewer installation much sooner, in time to avoid the need to upgrade septic systems. Representatives from the City of Orono would be wUling to meet with owners of the properties which would be affected by municipal sewer service to Bracketts Point. ^ smg e meeting with all residents late in the afternoon is preferable. We underst ind George Pillsbury has offered his house as a meeting place. A representative from your neighborhood will be calling you shortly to attempt to arrange such a meeting. Any questions regarding this matter may be directed to me at 473-7357. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator p.s. Enclosed for your reference is a copy of the inspection report for your system 1 # . ^es/e?'^-5 : Z1 m mf» Faegre & Benson _^_^_^ PirasiP**^*- c«»T»o .... So.--.iT CiNTT*, 9° M3^;t.oou>. Minn-ot* <;^cx.»?c TIxJL' »<0"** o11-3>C ti2 33Q-^?2®ThCVUS M. CPOS6Y. J". 6U.i3»3’27 June 7, 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning AdminisL'aiof Cjt^'ofOrono Cit>' Hall P.O.Box 66 Crysul Bay. MN 55323-00=6 Rc; T.mHt Residence ........«“““ Sincerely, [ ov^ Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. TMCxfl: Enclosures Ml 003*^4^^- 01 «T Li ^ DC London Frankfurt MmJty u ' < ll t:h I* i 1 0D' 07/^rr . =1 «-i - • — ^ - w •- - - •- [Cit>‘ of Orono Stationer>l June 1995 m?\FT 6/7/95 [Residents of Brackens Point] fetutof""w«e sen. .= each of ,he residents. A majority of the nonconforming In “ ,ac?*an Ute end of 1996. „ust be brought up to e»sung codes no. IPI 'a ii p* r XrrBrro;;«sPoin\ whde a ho. ;P°;;;;-„»f;4;:';^;Xnrp';mran^^ ^ u possrble. however, dta. * "h .runiiix^ »' adjacent residences for a. leas, ten years. . ^ Represen.at.ves from the Ci^ ^ sbglefsssr.s.”;;s.sur.,»r=~i o.....:-™-"-' ■• house as a rneciing place. June _, 1995 Page 2 :,„ins you shortly Questions cn ihss K^sTrun^leS ,0 rrre or Steve Wedotrurr veo ’ Jeanne cr\ r^nnZonmg Admrntstraior. C.h- of Oron ps.Enclosed for your reference rs a copy of the mspectron report for your system. Ml O033011.01 I li I : i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 'A DATE: June 7. 1995 ^ , //aA5^: ITEM NO: /() % Department Approval: Name Dorothy Halim Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Request for Off-Sale Liquor License Agenda Section: Cit> Administrator’s Report THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED AT THE JUNE 12th COUNCIL MEETING Attachment: 1 . 2. Memo to City Administrator Dated March 30, 1995 Copy of Plat Map Indicating Property Location An application has been received for an off-sale liquor license at the Orono Shopping Center, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard. Background A brief description of the initial licensing process according to the city code is as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Application is made upon forms prescribed by the city. Payment of investigation fee. Background investigation by Orono Police Department. Within 30 days of the police report and recommendation a public hearing must be scheduled. Published notice of the hearing must be made at least 10 days prior to the hearing giving the date, time and place of the hearing, name of applicant, place where business is to be conducted and any other information the Council may direct. The Council may approve the application for the remainder of the license year. Upon rejection of any application for a license, or upon withdrawal of an application before approval of the issuance by the Council, the license fee shall be refunded to the applicant. The applicant has completed the proper forms and paid $150.00. The background investigation has not been started as of this date. The City Code authorizes a maximum of two off-sale licenses to be issued in the city. Currently one license has been issued. This is for Navarre Liquors located in Nav^e. The code also indicates that no off-sale establishment may be located closer than 1/2 mile from the off-sale premise licensed in the city of Orono. The location of the proposed off-sale liquor operation meets the ordinance requirements. However, there is an off-sale liquor establishment located in Long Lake on the south side of Highway 12 almost directly across from the proposed location. Request for CouncO Action continued page 2 of 2 June 9, 1995 Request for Off-Sale Liquor License As ihe licensing process outlined above indicates, the license review process includes a background investigation by the Police Department, then a public hearing held \^ithin 30 days of the police report. Because the Council has not had to consider issues related to off-sale liquor licensing in recent years, the Council may wish to discuss these at a work session or at a Council meeting prior to moving ahead with the Orono Shopping Center application. The Council could plan to do this during the time the Police Department is completing its background investigation, unless the Council has concerns regarding the application that are significant enough that they should be addressed prior to the initiation of the background investigation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to direct staff to proceed with the background investigation and to bring the results of the investigation back to the Council for the scheduling of a public hearing. 1 TO:Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: Dorothy Hallin. Cit>* Clerk DATE: March 30. 1995 St.-BJECr: Per.din, AppUca.ion by Wiman. W«r for Off-Sa,e Liquor License On March :Sth the City received an West Wayzata Boulevard Wear to obtain an off-sale liquor license at his property locateo (Orono Shopping Center). This property meets the zoning requirements for an off-sale liquor establishment and the following criteria in the cit\' code: O ■ Cnhd on No off-sale esublishment be located within 500 feet of an “lon'of public e'ducation whose primary purpose is education of individuals m grades kindergarten through 12th grade. 'section 4.31. Subd. 21. No [kenseA^td InVhTS^^^ former municipal off-sale operation. Navarre Liquors, located in Navarre.) A brief description of the initial licensing process according to the city code is as follows: 1.Application is made upon forms prescribed by the City. Payment of investigation fee 3. 4. Background investigation by Orono Police Department. Within 30 days of the police repon and tVa^'w toSfs°U to°be conducted and any other information the Council may direct. The Council may approve the application for the before 0^fTeTs^:^rbr.vsu^^^^^ “ - applicant. The City of Long Lake currently has two off-sale liquor ^Svtd Bom orthfse esmblishmeots ai located on the south side of Highway 12- 5. J?0 #9 lr= ^ ^ PIIfv3 * I ' I f J-J5^ V C7k - Tm 3 ^•Sf f\J a \ mi-o#. too m- Innlm 1 ^ «k.3 ii Hi • IC0TM 1 160 -----------^ r. .» il7 r tORONe-ff.,. 17136 “ -*i H f 136. U -pBT5 ^ 1 (Ti. « j 5SN—» 1 ^ ^..-... • *'3 FvtI Ki ^ Ol K <4 '' “ “ ty* ^ rvj C—0 >a-^ 2s> ^ 25s ^ g (r=^ t n. 4 «DR1MHALL AVE -b. 3t? It 'h. 3«M/ tC‘lJ‘1 <>• 1 M m Uii.49 o iO . .566 iM.e ■"■ ^ W. if* •-?0 V>^r, *»' -•(A3^V°) < « \1 5^ (?^ ^:| 50 iL 'V*»SHAUG(INESSY 116.43 m >111 . f*..,i y «y X - S 7“jj P t- I -X' 3lf4.Q| . 0 .?-/y.M •*. * 3^7. 8 CIR B ■ -----.J^----- .*• '“••' j-irsnsT-Ts r \ r'.ii •,i :/ - m s ly.ji * 40 (20)a <?4 01 S3.34I N 54.00 i. i• • — ;5xn 40 51 ?9; . 7\5.• • a . !“ I *•ts^ % Ca'JXUlK'iEEnfilG request for council action JUN ? 6 1995 DATE cm if MONO TE: June ly95 ITEM NO.: / / Department Approval: Name John Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Adminisinuor’s Repon Item Description: Resolution - On May 22. 1995, Council reviewed conceptual plans for improvements to County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road to the Orono/Wayzata border. After review of the plans. Council directed Hennepin County to proceed wim prelitninaiy plam fofLTsarLea. As a matter of procedure, a resolution should have been submitted and approved. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: directing Hennepin County to prepare preliminary plans forTo approve Resolution No County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road. A RESOLUTION DIRECTING HENNEPIN COUNT\ TO PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD 15 EAST OF ORONO ORCHARD ROAD WHEREAS, Hennepin County has presented conceptual plans for improvements to County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has reviewed the plans and has conducted a public m«.‘cling for the residents to offer comments; and WHEREAS, the City Council agrees that preliminary plans showing more detail should be completed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City CouncU does hereby direct Hennepto County to prepare preliminary plans for improvements to County Road of Orono Orchard Road to the Orono/Wayzata border. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meetmg held this 22nd day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 1 of 1 a^TTi RiiTTimmig RTiTtKW^TiiriT^Ct] {•JTlttlTiT^ raisriiiRTiitj RfftliTiliiTlVriiTfDI WlFlfW riniit] t)' •■■ h-\'>*•'•* ■ f'' ' NIII;I.AN1) NURSKKV I.\c June1^l9« • f*VL. V• Kraus Anderson Construction Company 525 SouUi Etgluli Sirrei Minenapolis, MN 55404 I ♦-.-n « I -■ " » ^r:r95 7/29/03 35,884.00 z I.. i «Ti .> 1 ...• i-| I- - r i /'r* FTTZl^ R.U.A.23,000.(^' • M A H5 10.RR4.00 iifc: Urono City Hall & iniblic Works Garage v-u.AN* nin.rrnv IN«! -AVCL 5034C fl ... V \i • • .• •»•■• i . ■ V I — »» 1 . ' . f\•4 '• 'iv ■MPr I i %• % iNVC;C2 !nc.«<• J:jne 22. 1S93 . *T»-4ia No. 11272 .* . 4 ■ - ' ■ “^i';?:'^‘'‘'’'" -Sri«.»J«SerK- Ccnstnie’.lw Cc. Sb •teuw’iU'-'t-'' St^t -• r2j A g ^tTVir ~ ^ '..• ^ ♦. ,.•*v.- ‘ SE : Orc.no Cl tv Hall and Veres Gtar.*ca 30 Mr* •*• ■w p«»<V,.., s..- :^0 o«»«> — —""'If •>««>«»■ 0" wcd.^<;a:3<v» '•»l^ SKjS5i^Sfipj:•#_ r'.-r, t' ./ -■ 17 ■ {,^.VtV. ’♦ ■ .ViV.'.'rv* ♦••'’••■• Cfifltroct • ■ *■»• * •* # s^*-‘ ^ i .►' .. ^ , • I* #•.- • r •: . ^ *..>•.^ ••* - • s, •t*- . -.* ' .;v - ■ ?-. • j•'. r■ • •r. . % ■ > ^ *i'‘-' ■ • gesJ^oij ja?^>...,. •1/^ JH S^S-'•••■'■ SALSt TAX TOTAL - " •. i.. :*. r •# :A|»fHltCUTe YOUR BU«iM£SS $35,£34.00 •. .• $35,884.00 rnicilssirf ouir*ssr* . Hamal, MN S8340 iL<r S42S Highway S5 inc. 478.61^2 April 6. TO Mr. John Davies .Nraus Anderson Consiruction Company 523 SouLh Eighth Street Minneapolis. MN 334t>* RE: Orono City Hall Municipal Facilities Phase I Tj.NTisc.4PE PROPOSAL V Sugar Maple - 1-1/2 © 110.00 14 Pin Oak - 2* (g? IbO.OO 3 Basswood - 2" 160.00 6 Little Leaf Linden - 3" @ 210.00 12 Sen’iceberry - 8 ’ @120.00 ^ , ,n m 9 Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn - 2" @ 140.00 6 Red Splendor Crab - 2" @ 130.00 13 Ironwood - 2-1/2" @ 160.00 10 Quaking Aspen - 1" @ 60.00 6 Amur Bird Cherry - 2-1/2" @ 150.00 9 Black Hills Spruce - 8 ’ @ 300.00 11 Scotch Pine - 8 ’ @ uOO.OO 51 Glossy Black Chokeberry - 24" @ 14.00 117 Cardinal Dogwood - 24" @ 14.00 61 Bush Honeysuckle - 24" @ 16.00 119 Snowmound Spirca - 24" @ 14.00 51 Buffalo Juniper - 18" @24.00 39 Mint Julep Juniper - 18" @ 24.00 Ryerson Steel Edging 7.000 S.Y. of Sod @ 1.30/SY Shaking Trees & Mulch S 990.00 2.240.00 480.00 1.260.00 1.440.00 1.260.00 780.00 2,080.00 600.00 900.00 2.700.00 3.300.00 714.00 1.638.00 976.00 1.666.00 1.224.00 936.00 800.00 9.100.00 ^QO.QQ $35,884.00 MIDLAND NURSERY. INC HMF407 Harvey M. Foss Estimator •-i.l&riiuQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: JUN 2 6 1995 ITEM NO.: / ^ Department Approval: Name John Gerhaidson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Repon Item Description: Transfer of Funds - Community Development Block Grant Program In Years XIX and XX of the Community Development Block Grant Program, the City of Orono allocated funds to the Stubbs Bay Sewer Connection Grant Program. As a maner of procedure, funds must be used in a timely manner or they must be transferred to another project. The balance of the funds is as follows: Year XIX $ 4,217 Year XX $15.931 $20,148 It is recommended that the balance of funds in the Smbbs Bay Sewer Project Connection Grant Program be transferred to Housing Rehabilitation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To direct staff to notify Hcunepin County Planning and Development that the balance in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Connection Grant Program of $20,148 be transferred to Housing Rehabilitation. REQUEST FOR COUMCIL ACTION DATE ITEM HO■ :7/'. ,?p Department Approval : ^ Naae: Gary Ctcswlck Titla: Lieutenant Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectio City Adain. Kpt. Item Description: Request disposal of old squad car Exhibits: The Police Department request permission to dispose of a 1991 Ford Crotra Victoria, (VIH# 2FACP7205MX172498). Previously used in police patrol, and has been replaced by a new vehicle. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to sell vehicle to highest bidder as per city ordinance. foras/councU.act REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; ITEM NO: ...aCi.f.'EEnNG JUN 2 6 1995 'MllONO Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administraior Item Description: Acceptance of Donation Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator*!! Report The attached memo from Lt. Cheswick is requesting Council approval of the donation of a bicycle to be used by the Orono Police Department. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the acceptance of the donation of a mountain bike to the Orono Police Department from Mr. Peter Wells, and to express the appreciation of the Council and the Police Department to Mr. Wells for the donation. Date:June 20, 1995 To:Orono City Council From:Lt. Cheswick RE:Equipment donation on June 20, 1995 Mr. Peter Wells has graciously donated a mountain bike to the Orono Police Department. This bicycle is used, but is superior to most bicycles currently offered. I request acceptance of this equipment for use in bicycle patrol. C/ryREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 22, 1995 ITEM NO: / h Cr r,^ ’"'--.'a Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Citv Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Employment Matter Materials related to this item will be provided at the Council meeting COUNCIL meet!::g JUN 2 6 1995REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Department Approi^ Name Dorothy HaJlin j(\'^ Title City Clerk ^ hem t)escription: Licenses ITEM NO: / ^ Admiitistrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses There are no licenses. I r>5? ^ o' S Sc ^ ^; c? •‘ s -« ii<^ C5/13/95 PR; C3 PRREGCR EM?Utr *T ^D?T 472204554 ALCH, JERCME S. 471688060 APJDERSCrr, 3RUCE L 474563339 BGBZIEN, SUE A 476 921819 BORIS, SCOTT VJ 471840871 BOSMA, JA,MIE L. 4754 43862 BRIM’KHAUS, JCKil F "'cfo^Ton2 » JEREMIAH•.68843003 CARLSCM, MICHAEL B ^/2503991 CHESWICK, GARY B 169526026 CORNICR, JAMES L -.7.^98 9721 DEM30USKI, JAY C SrJGLiSH III, IRVING 468622940 ERICKSON, DOUGLAS J 4/2529007 ERICrCSCN, KURT R 463701863 FISCHENICH, DA:N T P R 469586562 GAFFRON, MICHAEL 463420832 GERHARDSON, JOHN 4 /4 667812 GREGORY, JAIAES D I^ALLIN, DOROTHY M 177500666 HANSEN, STEVEN C hansing, carol J HASEMAN, CAROLE 471569863 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P JOSTROM, FOREST J iV^lVc.^Zl KARNITZ, RICKY D jx 471848100 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN 31 ^72500574 KUEHN, THOMAS M 121262417 MABUSTH, JEANNE A *^75344512 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E 430043542 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L IZnnVrZZZ f^ILLER, CHRISTOPHER MOORSE, RONALD J 334506281 MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES •477028779 NELSON, DAVID D •5J^^°®428 OAS, DANIEL O OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G os R^en , randy L 476866274 OLSON, JOHN C. 4 70700901 OMAIJ, LYLE E Palmer, Gregory a peRsell, william r. 'VrVilllll PETERSON, JACK W ^^5382903 QUAST, WAYNE A Vnllnllll PATHBUN, BARRY J 473609629 ROSS, JOHN A 460320409 RUTHER, ALVIN C 470566529 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN 469629194 SKREEN, DALE S 475569177 STEFFENHAGEN, RON^ 267460042 SULLIVAN, STEPHE’ 472563051 THOMTON, MARK R 474663296 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE 470704904 TOMCZYK, MARK K 475505292 VAIIG, BRUCE L 468629488 VEE, LTMDA S 477881539 WECKjMAtj, STEPHEN J YTD GROSS B 93 239.40 31 24757.33 31 14026.47 31 16119.01 12 7861.71 42 21528.00 35 1159.31 31 4671.92 31 23069.28 31 23563.19 31 23902.44 31 22609.55 93 240.50 31 21000.12 31 20742.45 33 20180.16 42 30473.06 42 17378.24 12 17384.19 42 16085.29 31 8103.84 12 13987.34 31 22137.23 93 655.40 31 1890.71 ' 31 5075.70 15 29689.00 33 25272.87 93 1510.20 31 21473.46 15 14823.01 12 33042.71 31 22233.91 35 160.70 93 1351.60 42 16528.59 92 16241.83 15 12626.67 33 20130 15 42 16190.66 31 4567.74 93 2140.35 92 19185.53 92 16123.85 93 562.60 93 290.70 31 15534.27 42 16445.47 93 17384.16 31 28304.64 31 20849.3 '31 31 33 12 33 21854 20949 16982 14328 16119 90 75 15 00 00 CURRENT• GROSS! 57.00] 1789.79i 1071.20? 1235.001 628.23 1656.00: 388.16 314.18 17'’4.56 2245.53 1765.57 1744.45 1J9.50 1611.53 1682.08 1555.52 2240.23 1861,69 1340.00 1401.00 586.17 1071.20 1316.99 30 76 76 49 165 89 393 2288 1940.09 345.10 1972 03 1180.32 2449.44 1641.74 96.47 288.30 1360.87 1143.68 1017.68 1555.52 1143 60 224.43 403.70 1403.94 1143.69 40.60 159.60 1272.65 1143.69 1340.00 2177.28 1501.36 1818.56 1611.51 1340.00 1071.20 1242.48 67,043.50 = =5 = = = ss=»=* = s:rsss; / * * V'*. -• \ \COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jun 23 1995 00:48:39 Page 1CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0334441995/06/23 $5,621.00$5,621.00*CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H fc TRANSF 9999-2030 002922 OH 033445 1995/06/23 1995/06/23 $3,011.44 $10,279.81 $13,291.25* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA,MECC FIT,FICA,MEDCR W/H 9999-2032 9999-2030 002918 002918 OH OH 033446 1995/06/23 $40,988.97 $40,988.97* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL 9999-2030 002921 OH 033447 1995/06/23 $1,381.50 $1,381.50* GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 002925 OH 033448 1995/06/23 $100.00 $100.00* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 002924 OH 033449 1995/06/23 $3,138.23 $3,138.23* MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE STATE TAX WITHHELD 9999-2030 002919 OH 033450 1995/06/23 $100.00 $100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 002926 OH 033451 1995/06/23 $159.86 $159.86* PEBSCO/OBKA DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 002928 OH 033452 1995/06/23 $1,323.46 $1,323 .46* PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYO DEF COMP WITHHELD 9999-2030 002927 OH 033453 1995/06/23 1995/06/23 $3,703.61 $4,873.11 $8,576.72* PERA PERA PERA WITHHELD PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2030 9999-2031 002920 002920 OH OH 033454 1995/06/23 $30.00 $30.00* UNITED WAY CHARITY DONATIONS WI 9999-2030 002923 OH $74,710.99 OUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Fri Jun 23 1995 00:48:43UNO # 999 PAYROLL CLEARING $74,710.99$74,710.99 Page 1 I >COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.Page 1 MANUAL 1995/06/26 $104.36 AIR FILTER SUPPLY INC FURNACE FILTERS 0099-4231 6626 033359 1995/06/26 $69,59 $173.97* AIR FILTER SUPPLY INC FURNACE FILTERS 0129-4231 6626 1995/06/26 $65.26 ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPLACE LAMPS CO RD 0249-4232 9272-38 033360 1995/06/26 $39.54 $124.80* ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPLACE LAMP OCB (aHH 0249-4232 9272-39 033361 1995/06/26 $164.25 $164.25* ASCOM MAILING SYSTEM METER RENTAL 7/1/95-0099-4321 970445 1995/06/26 $5.30 ATfcT INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0549-4320 002882 033362 1995/06/26 $10.00 $15.30* AT6T INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE 0099-4320 002889 1995/06/26 $58.18 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF SANDWICHES/COFFEE 0591-4802 23959 033363 1995/06/26 $39.50 $97.68* AUGIES MOBILE CHEF COFFEE 0591-4802 20398 033364 1995/06/26 $147.70 $147.70* AUS COMMUNICATIONS INC INSTALL LAN CONNECTI 0629-4540 16522 1995/06/26 $114.22 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB BRIDGE INSP-APR 0355-4305 0341151995/06/26 $66.15 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD ST INSP -APR 0361-4305 0341161995/06/26 $354.28 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSPEC BROWN RD-APR 0360-4305 0341181995/06/26 $120.90 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN L.S. #7 REHAB-APR 9673-1600 0341191995/06/26 $85.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN KELLY AVE STORM SWR-0419-4305 0341201995/06/26 $513.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN PAVEMENT MGMT PROJ-A 0249-4305 0341211995/06/26 $162.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN UPDATE MSA NEED SHEE 0200-4305 0341141995/06/26 $4,112.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WTR PLANT STUDY 0549-4305 0337531995/06/26 $100.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN APRIL SERVICE 0200-4304 0341131995/06/26 $260.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN APRIL SERVICE 0200-4305 0341131995/06/26 $1,368.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN HWY 12 SAFETY INSP-A 0358-4305 0341131995/06/26 $179.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BASE MAP INFO/COST E 0200-4305 0341131995/06/26 $720.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WTR PLANT SAC CALCUL 0549-4305 33746-21995/06/26 $832.02 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN APPLICATIONS-APRIL 0840-4305 0341131995/06/26 $171.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WAYZATA SWR FLOW ANA 0569-4305 0341131995/06/26 $88.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WTR PLANT SAC CALCUL 0549-4305 0341131995/06/26 $814.25 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN I & I PROGRAM-APRIL 0569-4305 034113 033365 1995/06/26 $753.00 $10,814.82* BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OLD BEACH RD CULDESA 0200-4305 034113 033366 1995/06/26 $38.06 $36.06* BUDGET PRINTING 1994 ANNUAL REPORT C 0099-4322 10031 033367 1995/06/26 $83.52 $83.52* CHUNKS GARAGE SIREN REPAIR #170 0129-4341 6240R 033368 1995/06/26 $16,474.00 $16,474.00* CITY OF MOUND 3RD QTR FIRE SERVICE 0132-4317 002897 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH jOUNCIL check register Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49 Page 2CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL1995/06/26 $440.50$440.50*COCA COLA VENDING POP FOR RESALE 0591-4802 4290168 OH 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $1S7.68 $505.84 $693.52* COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO JUNE INS JUNE INS 9999-2030 0129-4152 0607950000615 0607950000615 OH OH 1995/06/26 $199.07 $199.07* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL CHECK PANEL G.S. N2 0569-4344 3633 OH 1995/06/26 /29.30 $29.30* CULLIGAN JUNE,JULY SERVICE 0590-4343 002878 OH 1995/06/26 $280.53 $280.53* EGGHEAD SOFTWARE HARVARD GRAPHICS 3.0 0626-4560 19131655 OH 1995/06/26 $164.50 $164.50* EMBLEM ENTERPRISES INC EMBROIDERED PATCHES 0129-4221 48156 OH 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $206.35 $30.00 $236.35* FEED RITE CONTROLS FEED RITE CONTROLS CHLORINE CYLINDER RENTAL 0549-4234 0549-4234 61478 26323 OH OH 1995/06/26 $17,040.00 $17,040.00* FIRST BANK NATIONAL AS BOND INT DUE 7-1 0908-4620 002911 OH 1995/06/26 $93.91 $93.91* FISCHENICH/DAN BIKE PATROL GEAR 0129-4221 002902 OH 1995/06/26 $159.00 $159.00* FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 3RD QTR MONITORING 0099-4343 235539 QH 1995/06/26 $5,394.29 $5,394.29* FORD CONSTRUCTION CO I L.S. #7 RENOVATION P 9673-1500 002912 OH 1995/06/26 $127.32 $127.32* G & K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0129-4343 527695 OH 1995/06/26 $8.82 $8.82* GERRING'S CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002886 OH 1995/06/26 $84.00 $84.00* GIBBONS-KEARNS INC BUG SPRAY 0590-4232 3540 OH 1995/06/26 $96.90 $96.90* GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR GOLF CART 0590-4342 951476 OH 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $91.00 $91.00 GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL MAY SERVICE MAY SERVICE 0569-4306 0549-4306 002890 002890 OH OH 1 033369 033370 033371 033372 033373 033374 033375 033376 033377 033378 033379 033380 033381 033382 033383 ICOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49 Page 3::hbck no CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTICN ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL 033384 $182.00*-- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -- - - 033385 1995/06/26 $350.00 $350.00* GOVT FINANCE OFF ASN CAFR REVIEW FEE 0069-4300 002905 OH 033386 1995/06/26 $250.00 $250.00* HENN CTY FIN DIV PROPERTY OWNER'S LIS 0468-4306 002910 OH 033387 1995/06/26 $113.52 $113.52* HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU POSTAL VERIFICATIONS 0099-4321 002883 OH 033388 1995/06/26 $330.00 $330.00* HOLMES k GRAVEN STARKS & FIELDS MATT 0080-4303 47985 OH 033309 1995/06/26 $149.33 $149.33* IDENTI-GRAPHICS LETTERING ON POLICE 9115-4520 12327 OH 033390 1995/06/26 $100.00 $100.00* JOHN DUNN PAINTING, IN PAINT POLICE DOOR 0129-4343 002896 OH 033391 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $53.13 $6.64 $39.05 $99.62* KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE-MAY MILEAGE-MAY MILEAGE-MAY 0069-4381 0174-4381 0569-4381 002894 002894 002894 OH OH OH 033392 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $289.00 $2,022.00 $3,111.00* LABOR RELATNS LABOR RELATNS ASSOC ASSOC LELS MATTER LELS MATTER 0299-4306 0299-4306 002885 002084 OH OH 033393 1995/06/26 $616.50 $616.50* LAKE MANAGEMENT INC WEED & ALGAE CONTROL 0590-4343 002900 OH 033394 1995/06/26 $2,221.28 $2,221.28* LAWN DETAILERS INC.TRIMMING AROUND FENC 0290-4343 1193 OH 033395 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $376.99 $526.00 $226.00 $667.00 $1,842.00 $2,205.00 $790.00 $24.60 $10.54 $793.93 $7,462.06* LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE LOGIS - SUITE 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 MAY DISC SPACE MAY SERVICES MAY SERVICES MAY SERVICES UB SOFTWARE FINAL MAY SERVICES UB SOFTWARE FINAL MAY DISC SPACE MAY DISC SPACE MAY DISC SPACE 0099-4355 0569-4352 0549-4352 0129-4352 9673-1500 0099-4352 9672-1500 0569-4355 0549-4355 0129-4355 AR0595 AR0595 AR0595 AR0595 AR019S-1 AR0595 AR0195-1 AR0595 AR0595 AR0595 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 033396 1995/06/26 $59.00 $59.00* LONG LAKE FAMILY PRACT HEPATITU3 SHOT-KUTZ 0129-4306 002900 OH :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49 Page 4DESCRIPTION REPLACE WINDOW #426 ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0249-4341 19853 9673-1191 00289B OH 9112-3840 5-118-118 OH 0129-4381 002893 OH 0129-4151 1358355 OH 0249-4151 1358355 OH 0174-4151 1358355 OH 9999-2030 1358355 OH 0569-4395 51480795 OH 0569-4396 51480795 OH 9673-3756 51480795 OH 9673-1194 51480795 OH 9673-3755 51480795 OH 9673-1193 51480795 OH 0651-4520 11272 OH 0099-4210 236876 OH 0249-4221 70660006951 OH 9672-2222 002879 OH 0080-4302 002895 OH 0129-4152 002914 OH 9999-2030 002914 OH 0129-4340 95Q02224 OH 0039-4356 002913 OH 033397 1995/06/26 $103.40 $103.40* 033398 1995/06/26 $11.31 $11.31* 033399 1995/06/26 $2,455.36 $2,455.36* 033400 1995/06/26 $3.50 $3.50* 033401 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $160.71 $461.72 $602.02 $532.02 $1,756.47* 033402 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $24,474.75 $2,986.58 -$919.58 -$1,529.92 -$80.25 -$302.58 $24,629.00* 033403 1995/06/26 $10,884.00 $10,884.00* 033404 1995/06/26 $74.36 $74.36* 033405 1995/06/26 $36 .22 $36.22* 033406 1995/06/26 $1,038.00 $1,038.00* 033407 1995/06/26 $7,955.75 $7,955.75* 033408 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $74.22 $10.18 $84.40* 033409 1995/06/26 $150.00 $150.00* 033410 1995/06/26 $272.03 $272.03* LONG LAKE GLASS LYNN, JEFFREY G. MCKAY NURSERY CO MCNICHOLS, DAVID MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE METRO METRO METRO METRO METRO METRO WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE MIDLAND NURSERY INC MIDWEST BSNS PROD MINN COMM MINN DEPT OF HEALTH MINNETONKA MN BENEFIT ASSN MN BENEFIT ASSN MN DEPT PUB SAFETY REFUND CLOSED UTILIT LANDSCAPING PARKING REIMS. JULY INS JULY INS JULY INS JULY INS MWCC- MWCC MWCC MWCC MWCC MWCC JULY JULY JULY •JULY ■JULY •JULY MOORSE RON LANDSCAPING-REM. BAL MISC SUPPLIES PAGER SERVICE 2ND QTR WTR TESTING 3RD QTR PROSECUTION JULY INS JULY INS CJDN CHARGES-JUNE HOTEL REIMB-LMC CONF COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICl 033411 1995/06/26 $20.00 $20.00* MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES S.P. POLICE MTG 0129-4356 002916 033412 1995/06/26 $23.43 $23.43* MPFC MISC SUPPLIES 0590-4231 002880 1995/06/26 $10.87 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0590-4231 002887 1995/06/26 $115.10 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0590-4232 0028871995/06/26 $16.78 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0549-4231 0028871995/06/26 $10.82 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4231 0028871995/06/26 $133.77 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0249-4232 0028871995/06/26 $4.25 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0569-4232 0028871995/06/26 $3.53 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0290-4232 0028871995/06/26 $11.90 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0549-4232 002887 033413 1995/06/26 $19.87 $326.89* NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES 0129-4232 002887 1995/06/26 $10.26 NSP NSP COSTS 0290-4324 0029031995/06/26 $111.85 NSP NSP COSTS 0249-4324 002903 033414 1995/06/26 $594.68 $716.79* NSP NSP COSTS 0569-4324 002903 033415 1995/06/26 $1,110.57 $1,110.57* NSP STREET LIGHT BILL 0249-4325 002907 033416 1995/06/26 $89.00 $89.00* OFFICE PROD OF MN SERV CONTRACT 6/20/9 0129-4340 260580 1995/06/26 $11.55 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.CHIPS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 771923 033417 1995/06/26 $7.92 $19.47* OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.CHIPS FOR RESALE 0591-4802 771924 1995/06/26 $6.87 OLSON, JOHN C.MILEAGE REIMB.0069-4381 002917 033418 1995/06/26 $13.81 $20.68* OLSON, JOHN C.MILEAGE REIMB.0569-4381 002917 1995/06/26 $219.50 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR SQUAD AUCTION FEES 9001-3790 15255 033419 1995/06/26 $498.00 $717.50* PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR ASPHALT PATCH 0249-4233 60105MB 1995/06/26 $19.53 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #173 0129-4341 58461995/06/26 $112.44 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST SERVICE,OIL CtlANGE #0129-4341 57941995/06/26 $19.53 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #173 0129-4341 5510 1995/06/26 $61.08 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST SERVICE,OIL CHANGE #0129-4341 54221995/06/26 $25.00 PRO TIRE fit EXHAUST SERVICE,TIRE REPAIR 0129-4341 53511995/06/26 $19.53 PRO TIRE fit EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #171 0129-4341 5331 033420 1995/06/26 $62.95 $320.06* PRO TIRE fit EXHAUST ALIGNMENT #171 0129-4341 5680 PO HUM.Page 5 MANUAL OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49 Page €HECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL1995/06/26 $1,005.00 PROLAWNS WEED CONTROL-HAY 0290-4343 002891 OH 033421 $1,005.00* 1995/06/26 $25.40 QUAST/W.\YNE PARKING REIMB 0249-4356 002901 OH 033422 $25.40* 1995/06/26 $51.60 REED VENDING CANDY FOR RESALE 0591-4802 29885 OH 033423 $51.60* 1995/06/26 $9.01 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3766078 OH 1995/06/26 $20.58 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0099-4210 3768298 OH 1995/06/26 $113.65 RITZ CAMERA FILM 0129-4210 3765533 OH 1995/06/26 $4.41 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 3767590 OH 033424 $147.65* 1995/06/26 $6,267.20 ROLF B ERICKSON JULY FEE 0059-4307 002899 OH 033425 $6,267.20* 1995/06/26 $29.77 ROLLINS OIL CO HAND CLEANER 0549-4232 107114 OH 1995/06/26 $29.78 ROLLINS OIL CO HAND CLEANER 0249-4232 107114 OH 1995/06/26 $29.78 ROLLINS OIL CO HAND CLEANER 0569-4232 107114 OH 033426 $89.33* 1995/06/26 $19.91 SCHLUMBERGER GAS PUMP CARDS 0099-4232 164387 OH 033427 $19.91* 1995/06/26 $645.03 SERV A CLEAN CARPET CLEANING 0099-4343 002892 OH 1995/06/26 $430.02 SERV A CLEAN CARPET CLEANING 0129-4343 002892 OH 033428 $1,075.05* 1995/06/26 $109.22 SEW LIKE NEW UNIFORM REPAIRS 0129-4221 24871 OH C-^3429 $109.22* 1995/06/26 $187.50 SPRING PARK CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002881 OH 033430 $187.50* 1995/06/26 $2,822.00 STERLING FENCE INC FENCING 0395-4511 13743 OH 033431 $2,822.00* 1995/06/26 $66.81 STREICHERS UNIFORMS 0129-4221 002888 OH 033432 $66.81* 1995/06/26 $6.00 SULLIVAN, STEPHEN PARKING REIMB 0129-4356 002915 OH 033433 $6.00* 1995/06/26 $976.95 TRI STATE PUMP REPAIR #1 PUMPER G.S 0569-4344 12401 OH 033434 $976.95* 1995/06/26 $54.00 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR ADJUST OPENER LIMITS 0099-4343 49843 OH 033435 $54.00* t COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:49 Page 7CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL 033436 1995/06/261995/06/261995/06/26 $459.25$65.70$134.01 $658.96* UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BODY ARMOR-DEMBOUSKI MELTON UNIFORM TOMCHECK,JOHNSON UNI 0129-42210129-42210129-4221 493688494162494581 OHOH OH 033437 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 1995/06/26 $17.75 $45.94 $133.12 $26.63 $223.44* US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN DATA LINE US WEST COSTS DATA LINE DATA LINS 0549-4355 0549-4320 0099-4355 0569-4355 002904 002904 002904 002904 OH OH OH OH 033438 1995/06/26 $99.05 $99.05* WARNING riTES OP MN BARRICADE RENTAL-MAY 0249-4331 71552 OH 033439 1995/06/26 $140.05 $140 05* WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002906 OH 033440 1995/06/26 $832.00 $832.00* HIDMER BROS REPAIR SWR FORCE MAI 0569-4344 14467 OH $135,901.73 FUND # FUND # FUND # FUND # FUND II FUND # FUND # FUND U FUND II FUND II FUND # CHECK SUMMARY Thu Jun 22 1995 00:12:54001GENERAL FUND $53,788.23112PARK FUND $5,277.36HiIMP/EQUIP 0/L FD $428.23115BLDG CAP 0/L FD $11,033.3334585 IMP BD D/S FD $17,040.00423MUN ST AID CO/FD $1,902.65 424 PERM IMP REV FD $335.50 672 WTR OPERATING FD $7,439.83 673 SNR OPERATING FD $36,341.37 674 G/C OPERATING FD $1,585.35 999 PAYROLL CLEARING $72’.“'* $135,901.73 Page 1 W information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 6 1995 CITY Of ORONO OF t ------^ LNFOR iMATION only To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan and Councilmembers Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator June 22, 1995 Update - Lakeside Mtirina The attached letter provides an update on issues : am currently discussing with Lakeside Marina. Mr. Dunn has sold his residential property at 3350 North Shore (next to Gayle's) to the DNR, but apparently has an agreement with DNR for leasing the Straley property and the Crystal Bay side of 3350, for whatever purposes he can get approved by the various governmental bodies with jurisdiction. I anticipate submitting Lakeside's 1995 license application for Council review at the July 10 meeting. s ,\ 'Ad ^./ June 16, 1995 CITY of ORONO Municipal OfEces Street Address: 2750 Keiley Parkway Orono. VN £5356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 65 Crystal Bay. MN 55373-006S Mr. James Dunn Lakeside Marina, Inc. 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Dunn: P„ our discussion on Wednesday, June 7,1 would like to address a number of issues related to Lakeside Marina. 1. Zoning of property south of County Road 51. Attached are zoning maps from 1967. 1975 and the present see. only property north of County Road 51 is zoned commerci^. to be the case dating back to adoption of Ordinance No. 9 on March 11. 195 . Any land which you own on the south side of County Road 51 is Single Family Lakeshore Residential. W acre mimminn lot sue. except for^t portion across from your easterly 70'. which is zoned LR-IB. Smgle Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 acre. You are not permitted to have a commercial dock in a residential zone. Mr^ Mehner operated a gas dock under a conditional use permit for ^ °on-confo^g use granted in 1981 which established his or others’ previous and contmuous use of that dock. Mr. Kempf in the 1960s and ’70s apparently had Crystal Bay side of Lakeside Marina’s property, which our files mdicate the c ty consistently disallowed from any commercial use. The B-2 ordinance contains language in Subdivision 8 (E) indicating required parking spaces may not be separated by a public roadway ^ a storage space, mooring space, floor space, or ramp they are designed w se . It has been and continues to be the City’s position that any dock you . on Crystal Bay across from Lakeside Marina is not legal, because it . j t. accessory to a commercial use and therefore defined as a commercial doc , is not allowed on residentially-zoned property. Te ephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Mr. James Durm June 16, 1995 Page 2 of 5 2. Further, the City hes oolyNorth Shore Dnve to con^ue^r— use of ‘to' it is zoned commercial. As we have discussed sanctioned by the svould require a conditional use pciSt '’?or w^Tyou applied in 1985 but never foltowed through, and which application was declared closed by the Council m 1991. Further, be agam 'to'^o^arrti'ne^m [TslS: 3350 property must be regist d ^ j J occupant of the property) ate commercial storage and you will have to remove them. Current zoning of D*NR property along your east boundary. mo enclosed 'North Shore Drive Commemial of six maps indicate the ° ^ boundary, were zoned commercial units per structure, i.e. twin homes, Inples, or quads. By staff calculation, the DNR property is approximately 1.51 acres. You indicated to me that your P“‘chase/greement wi* DOT on the 33M pelSSedTie pmper^“lb“ M aTr^cipal residence structure ^ P^; lo dock could be constructed on the property for any purpose. Fu^ ’ gtomer , mmmprriTl vou would be allowed no employee or a rezorung to commercial, you wouiu c i„,,,-/t~»ii#»r«!/''smff" wouldparking, and no temporary or permanent storage of boats/trailers/ smti be allowed. 3. Potential rezoning of DNR property. You requested information regarding an application to rezone the DNR prop ^ I Mr. James Dunn June 16, 1995 Page 3 of 5 4. Tw'of *is property. Whoever is the owner at the tmte you make application would have to be a co-applicant. The 19S0 Otoiio Comprehensive Plan discusses and maps only that area from TOur current east boundary to Tonkawa Road as planned for commercial manna use The Comprehensive Plan was not revised in 1984 when North Shore Dnve Marina was rezoned from LR-lC-1 to B-2. However, at that time the Pla^g Coi^ission recommended to CouncU that the area between Lakeside and Nonh ShoTorive Manna only be allowed rezoning to commercial upon accumulation of a o acre oarcei The Citv Council did not take formal action to adopt that noliev and in fact,’ it is merely the recommendation of the Planning Coi^iss.on L 1984 L notUng more. The City has never formally coined to such rezoning should it be requested, and 1 cannot predict the result of such a request. A formal application for rezoning would be made via a 8'”“^ '“d use annlication (copy attached). The base fee is $300. You would have to provide a co^lete and current survey of the property per the guidelmes »PP“ packet, and provide detailed site planning for your proposed use of the property. You should anticipate that the City would grant no variances to any standards regarding setbacks, hardcover, landscaping, etc. This would have a significant impact on your potential use of the property. Further, the totion and namre of vehicular access to North Shore Drive would undoubtedly be an issue of concern. I wUl be happy to discuss with you further and in detail how the City’s codes might impact your potential expansion onto this adjacent property. Conditional use permit (CUP) required under amended ordinance. As we briefly discussed on June 7, a conditional use permit is now required for certain uses of your property which have been ongoing or are now proposea. These include: .... ^ Proposed caretaker/security dwelling within manna property. On-demand launching of boats owned by the public and stored on your property. Public boat launch ramp for transient users. Charter boat port-of-call. Mr. James Dunn June 16, 1995 Page 4 of 5 K mpt in order to be granted each of these conditional uses ™—rsn existing structures arid har apportioned, used and managed rm:cVryorp"togTe,uireLn.^ The minunum parking repuiremems are listed in Subdivision 8 of that ordinance. held on June 6, 1994. Th p affected marinas. A copy and copies of the ."“‘inutes is enclosed. Orono marinas were first llTei'to m^'^he appropriate conditional use permit applications m a letter dated February 3, 1995. We are currently processing regarding club use, and have h^^^^Xg and onSemand launching CUP'S, which their application for caretaker ® ,, operating without the necessary is anticipated shortly. You are violation of the code untU they are conditional use permits ^d tecl^ y appropriate applied for and issued. ju^l^g Commission meeting ifp^ossible. However, noting Jhe « you aU » fubXVoM- c'S^ application by the duly 28 deadline for items to be reviewed at the August Planning Commission meetmg. A-t- c riTP anoroval on compliance with the approved The ordinance „view the iLsca landscape plan You and I must me approval. I believe there and establish a landscapmg plan for Councu re«ew pf including are certain items of landscapmg on your P' P ^ j access to the property, re^establishment of the landscape cribbing at ±e sou^west ^ce as well as reviewing the seteemng issues. The code “view site drainage as par, of ‘“^,?PP'‘““°“' ”ta „ coloU wWch likely establish a time table by which you will provide Planning will include ponding. Given the mtensity hardcover on residential Commission and CouncU have Sr/4ve an obligation to manage theproperties in Orono, I believe you and the City have ^ ooiigai runoff from your large expanses of hardcover m an pp P Mr. James Dunn June 16, 1995 Page 5 of 5 5. Completion of stjTofoam conversion. ^ fnr record vour stated intent to complete the conversion of We have noted for the rec ' ^ approved flotation method by July your docks from non-encas deadline and 1. Although this wi lMCD ’s deadline for that conversion, I can approximately two months la _-n.oie^jtv of the conversion. Since other appreciate the expense ttnte Ute conversion. I will marinas have similarly borne ij .ug conversion not be completed by July 6. 1995 marina license. Now that we have your “Pf be submitted fnot to issue Utose licenses ^u'ul r s^roforconv^ion has been completed. I would expect the same condition on your license approval. Thank you for removing the dock section from the boulevard as requested. «« onv nf the above and advise when we can meet in the next Please call if you have quesuons on any of the aoove. anu au week or two for a site inspection. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Admimstrator MPG/lsv Enc. Metropolitan Working for the Region. Planning for the Future Council June 21, 1995 JUN 2 2 1035 Ed Callahan Mayor City Of Orono 2545 N Shore Drive Crystal Bay MN 55323-0164 Dear Mr Callahan; The Metropolitan Council staff has prepared a preliminary population and household estimate (April 1, 1994) for your community. Enclosed for your review is a 1994 worksheet which includes 1990 Census background data. The estimates are used by the Council to monitor population and household change in the region. Last year the Council conducted a household size survey of 50,000 Metro Area households to assist us in estimating the number of people in households. Our intent was ^ to measure current household sizes for single-family and multifamily units and then to calculate changes since the 1990 census. We have incorporated the results into the enclosed April 1994 estimates. We strive to provide estimates that are accurate and that treat each municipality consistently. If you have questions about the estimates, please contact Kathy Johnson at 291-6332. If you prefer to submit written comments, please direct these to Ms. Johnson as well. We would like to send the estimates to the State Department of Revenue by mid-July for use in their local aids formulas. To do so, we need to receive your comments by July 7, 1995. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, James Solem Regional Administrator JS/kj Enclosure 230 East Fimi Strrrt St. PauJ. .MlnnesoU 55101-1634 (612)291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780 .An Eauni Oppommtru Emnlouer METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROVISIONAL POPULATION ESTI^L\TE ________________________________APRIL!. 1994 ___________ Gty or Township: ORONO 1994 Housing Units Housing Bv Type 1990 Census Housing Units 1994 Estimated Completed Housing Units 1994 1 Estimated 1 Occupied 1 Hcuseiiolds Sinele-Familv 2.722 2.799 2,622 Multifamilv (incl. Townhouse)64 64 59 Mobile Home 1 1 1 TOTAL • 2.787 1 2.864 1 2,682 HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATE 1990 Census Households 2,613 1994 Household Estimate 2.682 POPULATION ESTIMATE 1990 Census Total Population 7,285 1990 Group Quarters Population 0 1990 Population in Households 7,285 1994 Population Estimate 7,444 1994 Group Quarters Population 0 1994 Population in Households 7,444 1 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 1990 Census Persons per Household 2.79 1994 Persons per Household 2.78 All numbers arc as of April 1 of each year. • This total includes 11 units listed in "other" housing in the 1990 Census data. The Census defmes these umts as those not fitting the defined housing categories, such as houseboats, railroad cars, campers and vans. Since no information on "other" umts is available between censuses, for purposes of 1994 population and household estimation, these units have been allocated to the single and multiple family categories. This was done based on persons per "other" household and the ratio of single-faimly to multifaimly housing in the jurisdiction. PEKMITS ISSUED/FEES COOELTED MAY 1995REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 06/01/95RERMIT TYPEbuilding ’GL FAMILY-NEW DUPLE/-NEW JF-ADD/REMODEL 9F-ACC STRUCTURE INST-ADL/REMODEL ACC/GARAGES Sub-total QTY4030611 42* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE! 1REQUESTER; CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 05/01/95 - 05/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 05/01/94 - 05/31/94BASE FEE7,987.00 0.00 7,155.75 340.50 56.75 237.25 15,777.25* VALUATION1,515,764.000.00796,953.0014.500.00 1,800.0015.225.00 2,344,242.00* PLAN REVIEW5,191.550.004,139.38201.8236.89154.21 9,723.85* QTY41235 0 2 35* BASE FEE5.260.00 15.003.739.00357.00 0.00225.00 9,596.00*VALUATION1,171,400.00500.00477,392.8025,600.000.0019,000.001,693,892.80*PLAN REVIEW3,419.010.002,018.92232.050.00146.255,816.23* Mechanical ^ SEATING SYSTEMS 6 560.50 43,113.00 0.00 7 767.12 61,342.00 0.00 MR CONDITIONING 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 125.08 7,406.00 0.00 FIREPLACE 3 117.50 5,800.00 0.00 2 132.50 8,800.00 0.00 SAS LINE INSPECT 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 2,500.00 0.00 13UCT WORK ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 62.50 5,000.00 0.00 REMOVE OIL TANK 1 35.00 1,100.00 0.00 2 70.00 1,500.00 0.00 UNDEFINED 1 247.50 19,800.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 11*960.50*69,813.00*0.00*17*1,227.20*86,548.00*0.00* Plumbinq _ __ FIXTURES 11 953.00 72,939.00 0.00 10 584.33 37,435.86 0.00 Sub-total 11^953.00*72,939.00*0.00*10*584.33*37,435.86*0.00* Sewer & Water _ SEWER CONNECTION /.35.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0.00 riEW SEPTIC SYSTE J.400.00 0.00 0.00 3 300.00 0.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 SEWER k WATER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 3*235.00*0.00*0.00*13*4,510.00*0.00*0.00* Fire ... FIREWORKS 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*50.00*0.00*0.00*0*0.00*0.00*0.00* User Defined . LAND ALTERATION 4 205.00 0.00 0.00 3 200.00 0.00 0.00 LAWN SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 4*205.00*0.00*0.00*6*305.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 72**18,180.75**2,486,994.00**9,723.85**81**16,222.53**1,817,876.66**5,816.23** PEWUTS issu»D/ri:t;s coLUjjrtD MAY 199bf-PORT NDR. DFEERPTl-1 ATE OF RUN 06/01/95 BUILDING ASE FEE r.AN REVIEW URCHARGE IC. SEARCH FEE AC NVESTIGATION EPOS IT AIL IN ERMIT TOTAL 15,777.25 9,723.85 1,173.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,674.20 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 06/01/95 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 18,100.75 PLAN REVIEW 9,723.05 SURCHARGE 1,246.06 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 10.35 PERMIT TOTAL 29,161.01 MECHANICAL 960.50 0.00 34.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 1,004 .41 *♦ PERMIT FEE REPORT •• CITY OF ORONOFROM 05/01/95 TO 05/31/95 PLUMBING SEWER 6 WATER 953.00 0.00 36.47 O.Or 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.3S 990.82 235.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 236.50 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 05/01/95 TO 05/31/95 USER 205.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 PAGE: 26REQUESTER: CAROLE SIGN FIRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 PAGE: 27 REQUESTER: CAROLE THU, JUN 1, ^995, 4:13 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MOUTH OF MAY 1995 PAGE 1WORKADDR 1012905012350 01 2900 01 2075 02 140 02 2605 02 4590 04 940 05 3520 05 635 06 755 06 940 06 2824 06 255 06 15 10 1055 11 3572 11 3590 11 3302 11 3500 11 60 11 356 11 2773 11 3420 11 1290 15 3559 15 1460 15 540 20 774 27 1125 29 2545 29 4000 29 1991 29 3580 29 3605 29 2007 29 1305 29 3745 29 996 30 2605 30 2010 31 537 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 42C FI 1C MB 01 1C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 3350 2735 3780 1205 1006 2760 3700 2990 DEER RUN TR SHADOWOOD DR DEER RUN TR DEER RUN TR LEAF ST KELLY AVE NORTH ARM DR NORTH ARM DR WATERTOWN RD FERNDALE RD N DICKEY LAKE DR DROWN RD S CASCO POINT RD LANDMARK DR BROWN RD S SHADYWOOD RD LIVINGSTON AVE NORTHERN AVE BAYSIDE RD LIVINGSTON AVE STUBBS BAY RD S WESTLAKE ST CASCO POINT RD BAYSIDE RD WILDHURST TR LYRIC AVE TANGLEWOOD RD BARRETT AVE TONKAWA RD WILLOW DR N KELLY AVE NORTH SHORE DR FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA BLVD NORTH SHORE DR CASCO POINT RD ORONO LA SHORELINE DR NORTH ARM DR KELLY AVE SUGARWOOD DR PARK LA FOX ST COUNTRYSIDE DR BAYSIDE RD TONKAWA RD WILDHURST TR COUNTRYSIDE DR BAYSIDE RD SOMERSET LA 95/05/0195/05/12 95/05/19 95/05/22 95/05/22 95/05/10 95/05/24 95/05/15 95/05/10 95/05/26 95/05/09 95/05/05 95/05/22 95/05/23 95/05/23 95/05/12 95/05/05 95/05/09 95/05/16 95/05/10 95/05/19 95/05/24 95/05/24 95/05/26 95/05/31 95/05/19 95/05/03 95/05/30 95/05/04 95/05/18 95/05/03 95/05/04 95/05/25 95/05/12 95/05/09 95/05/15 95/05/16 95/05/15 95/05/10 95/05/04 95/05/16 95/05/24 OR-006912 OR-006943 OR-006956 OR-006908 OR-006747 OR-006955 OR-006994 OR-006957 OR-006951 OR-007005 OR-006940 OR-006945 OR-006992 OR-006995 OR-006996 OR-006963 OR-006946 OR-006950 OR-006976 OR-006903 OR-006989 OR-006999 OR-007000 OR-007006 OR-007013 OR-006540 OR-006928 OR-007011 OR-006935 OR-006902 OR-006939 OR-006942 OR-006944 OR-006952 OR-006954 OR-006959 OR-006966 OR-00^970 OR-006981 OR-006926 OR-006965 OR-006990 147667600000000019421060 10947570 00000000 17705452 14740077 15446797 19416060 14747121 10230303 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 14717006 19553000 00000000 14734954 14733397 14726539 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 19291536 00000000 14725170 15460160 14706637 14725715 00000000 14551066 19430037 14721005 15330352 14724110 14214599 00000000 95/05/16 OR-006970 00000000 95/05/16 95/05/12 95/05/16 95/05/16 95/05/16 95/05/10 95/05/24 OR-006047 OR-006967 OR-006971 OR-006974 OR-006975 OR-006904 OR-007002 STICKNEY AND SCHWARZKEITH WATERS & ASSOC LEB/WATERSTREET BUILDERS HAUX DELMER CONSTRUCTION PETER BOYER CONSTRUCTION FILLA DESIGNERS/BUILDERS MOYNIHAN BUILDERS INC LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS THOMPSON PETER 34455620 37575040 34417259 39414211 34932477 35595900 37354663 SHEP'S CONSTRUCTION MIKE DENOMME CONSTRUCTION BETZ BUILDERS INC PLYMOUTH ROOFING SMITH WF ROOFING DAVID PINSKE DESIGN & BUIL JMN BUILDERS INC TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO ROBERT CRAIG HOMES INC THE CARPENTERS CONST CO VUJCVICH DESIGN/BUILD JOHN KRAEMER & SONS INC DRS HOME REPAIR & REMODEL qiVWMOR^P CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. METRO SUBURBAN CONST VIERECK FIREPLACE SALES DEPENDABLE HTG & AC SERVICE WEST KLEVE HTG k AC HEATING k COOLING TWO MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO SUMMIT HOME CENTER GROBE 375,000.00220,764.00BUCHANAN570,000.00 JARNES 350,000.00 22,650.00 STODDARD 20,000.00 HAGLUND 40,000.00 SPINNER 15,225.00 YOUNG 8,200.00 JACOBSON 34,000.00 ESAU 9,000.00 JOHrSTON 2,500.00 KAYl.OR 800.00 CASEY 3,000.00 EISS 4,800.00 KOSEK 4,000.00 CUFF 1,200.00 HUDERLE 400.00 ADDISON 4,000.00 ANDERSON 1,000.00 KROLL 3,800.00 ANDERSON 2,750.00 ERICKSON 2,575.00 ANDERSON 2,000.00 BIRKELAND 5,500.00 BERARD 2,300.00 BOLTE 700.00 JAFFRAY .00 FISHER 10,000.00 ERSKINE 5,000.00 PONZETH 195,000.00 BREZA 9,470.00 BORN 4,000.00 LURTON 50,000.00 UPTON 5,000.00 BAILEY 5,000.00 SPOONER 300,000.00 HEIDORN 1,800.00 41,300.00 STODDARD 3,900.00 MESHBESHBR 000.00 OLSON . 600.00 FULLERTON, III oo•WICKLUND 1,000.00 8,240.00 SMITH 1,100.00 20,000.00 5.000. 00 1.000. 00 3,800.00 PAGE 24:13 PMIIU, JUN 1, 1995,i:rmits issued for the month of MAY 1995KRMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET24243099lie2697358014001400L01269001370001350001460001130501404001276001462002345 24 2545 30 14 00 • 1C lie ?W 01 3700 01 2060 01 4590 3C ID 22 1510 22 2520 23 3500 34 3500 IC 4C 72C ETHEL AVE WAYZATA BLVD BRACKETTS POINT RD BRACKETTS POINT RDPHEASANT RD BAYSIDE RD WAYZATA BLVD BAYSIDE RD ORONO LA WATERTOWN RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W TONKAVIEW LA SPRING HILL RD KELLY AVE BRACKETTS POINT RD BAYSIDE RD WEBBER HILLS RD NORTH ARM DR W NORTH ARM DR CASCO POINT RD BAYSIDE RD BAYSIDE RD ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION95/05/12 OR-006960 95/05/26 OR-006997 95/05/12 OR-006962 95/05/12 OR-00696995/05/0195/05/0895/05/0895/05/1895/05/1995/05/1995/05/2595/05/3195/05/19 95/05/25 95/05/12 OR-006937OR-006947OR-006949OR-006985OR-006986OR-006990OR-007004OR-007012OR-006991OR-007003 OR-006961 95/05/08 OR-006948 95/05/17 OR-006979 95/05/17 OR-006980 35378491344612993487106134820444 IffiSllSreo'fcOOUNODOODY MECHANICAL INC GRIGGS CONTRACTING AMUNDSONJUNDTJUNDT25464483293325212472592057388355278447922933720024432921256128542546448324724959 24871061 PROPLUMB INC THOMPSON PLBG OLSON LARRY A-1 ROOTMASTER HOKANSON PLUMBING INC CULLIGANSOUTHWEST METRO PLBG KAL'S PLUMBING St HEATING PROPLUMB INCWESTONKX MECH CONTRACTORS DOODY MECHANICAL INC PUDILLURTONSLETTENWEEDSMIEJACOURNEYA FELDMAN PONZETTI JUNDT 29332521 54718151 54718151 THOMPSON PLBG PETERSON ELMER J CO PETERSON ELMER J CO COCCOLUTO HAGLUND 95/05/12 OR-006964 95/05/22 OR-006993 95/05/30 OR-007007 95/05/19 OR-006987 00000000 14724118 14718390 14718390 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC, ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC PIPER FRAHM BANGERT BANGERT 2,000.001,873.006,000.0019,800.0012,000.008.500.00 1,000.003.945.00 4,000.001.299.00 11,000.007.200.00 9,000.00 9,995.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,486,994.00* 01 Residence 24 Replacing Existing02Addition25Lifting Principal Residence03Garage/Attached 26 Well Abandonment04Garage/Detached 27 Foundation Only05Porch28Temporary Trailer06Deck29Renovate/Remodel07Fence30Accessory Structure08Gazebo31Stairway to Lake09Pool32Retaining Wall10Re-side 33 Entrance Monuments 11 Re-roof 34 Tree Removal 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Hove 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined LOCAL USB CODES 9999 Undefined HU, JUN 4:13 PMMJMLRICAL LISTING MAY 1995CRMIT NDR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NDR STREET PAGE 1COMPANYOWNER LAST NM VALUATIONBERARD2,300.00JARNES22,650.00VIERECK FIREPLACE SALES 1,000.00STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ 375,000.00CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC.STODDARD 3,900.00 BOLTE 700.00 DAVID PINSKE DESIGN !■ BUIL FISHER 10,000.00 PROPLUMB INC PUDIL 12,000.00 JMN BUILDERS INC PONZETH 195,000.00 THOMPSON PETER ESAU 9,000.00 TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO BREZA 9,478.00 GRODE 220,764.00 ROBERT CRAIG HOMES INC BORN 4,000.00 JOHNSTON 2.500.00 CUFF 1,200.00 THOMPSON PLBG 8,500.00 THOMPSON PLBG .00 OLSON LARRY LURTON 1,000.00 MOYNIHAN BUILDERS INC YOUNG 8,200.00 THE CARPENTERS CONSl CO LURTON 50,000.00 UPTON 5,000.00 HAUX DELMER CONSTRUCTION STODDARD 20,000.00 KEITH WATERS k ASSOC BUCHANAN 570,000.00 FILLA DESIGNERS/BUILDERS SPINNER 15,225.00 SHEP'S CONSTRUCTION HUDERLE 400.00 VUJOVICH DESIGN/BUILD BAILEY 5,000.00 DOODY MECHANICAL INC JUNDT 5,000.00 DOODY MECHANICAL INC JUNDT 6,000.00 KOSEK 4,000.00 PIPER .00 METRO SUBURBAN CONST MESHBESHER 4,000.00 JOHN KRAEMER k SONS INC SPOONER 300,000.00 DEPENDABLE HTG k AC WICKLUND 8,240.00 SUPERIOR CONTR INC AMUNDSON 2,000.00 GRIGGS CONTRACTING JUNDT 19,800.00 DRS HOME REPAIR k REMODEL 1,800.00 SERVICE WEST SMITH 1,100.00 KLEVE HTG k AC 20,000.00 HEATING k COOLING TWO 5,000.00 MIKE DENOMME CONSTRUCTION ADDISON 4,000.00 FULLERTON, III .00 PETERSON ELMER J CO COCCOLUTO .00 PETERSON ELMER J CO HAGLUND .00 SAWHORSE HEIDORN 41,300.00 ERSKINB 5,000.00 ANDERSON 1,000.00 MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO 1,000.00 A-1 ROOTMASTER SLETTEN 3,945.00 HOKANSON PLUMBING INC WEED 4,000.00 ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC BANGERT .00 LEB/WATERSTREET BUILDERS 350,000.00 BETZ BUILDERS INC KROLL 3,800.00 CULLIGAN SMIEJA 1,299.00 PROPLUMB INC FELDMAN 9,000.00 R-006548R-006747R-006847R-006912 R-006926 R-006920 R-006935 R-006937 R-006939 R-006940 R-006942 R-006943 R-006944 R-006945 R-006946 R-006947 R-006948 R-006949 R-006951 R-O06952 R-006954 'R-006955 'R-006956 ‘R-006957 95/05/19 N 95/C5/22 N 95/05/16 N 95/05/01 N 95/05/04 N 95/05/03 N 95/05/04 N 95/05/01 N 95/05/03 N 95/05/09 N 95/05/04 N 95/05/12 N 95/05/25 N 95/05/05 N 95/05/05 N 95/05/08 N 95/05/08 N 95/05/00 N 95/05/10 N 95/05/12 N 95/05/09 N 95/05/10 N 95/05/19 N N 355914027352905 2605 1460 774 2690 2545 755 4000 2350 1991 940 3572 3780 3780 3580 3520 3580 3r85 2605 2900 940 LYRIC AVE 15 LEAF ST 02 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 DEER RUN TR 01 KELLY AVE 30 TANGLEWOOD RD 15 TONKAWA RD 20 PHEASANT RD 01 KELLY AVE 29 DICKEY LAKE DR 06 NORTH SHORE DR 29 SHADOWOOD DR 01 EAGERNESS POINT RD 29 BROWN RD S 06 LIVINGSTON AVE 11 DAYSIDE RD 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 WAYZATA BLVD 01 WATERTOWN RD 05 WAYZATA BLVD 29 NORTH SHORE DR 29 KELLY AVE 02 DEER RUN TR 01 NORTH ARM DR 04 00000000 00000000 34455620 1476C768 14724118 00000000 19291536 25464483 14725170 18238303 15468160 00000000 14706637 00000000 00000000 29332521 29332521 24725920 19416060 14725715 00.00000 17705452 19421060 15446797 R-006958 95/05/09 N 3590 NORTHERN AVE 11 14717006 >R-006959 95/05/15 N 2 8 07 CASCO POINT RD 29 14551066 >R-006961 95/05/12 N 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 30 24071061 R-006962 95/05/12 N 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 30 34871061 )R-006963 95/05/12 N 1855 SHADYWOOD RD 10 00000000 'R-006964 95/05/12 N 1510 NORTH ARM DR 22 00000000 R-006965 95/05/16 N 2010 SUGARWOOD DR 30 14214599 >R-006966 95/05/16 N 1385 ORONO LA 29 19430037 )R-006967 95/05/12 N 3780 BAYSIDE RD 01 37575040 ^R-006968 95/05/12 N 2697 ETHEL AVE 24 35370491 )R-006969 95/05/12 N 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 99 34820444 )R-00C970 95/05/15 N 3745 SHORELINE DR 29 14721005 )R-006971 95/05/16 N 1205 TONKAWA RD 01 34417259 )R-006974 95/05/16 N lOOC WILDHURST TR 01 39414211 )R-006975 95/05/16 N 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 34932477 }R-006976 95/05/16 N 3382 DAYSIDE RD 11 19553008 ;R-006978 95/05/16 N 3350 FOX ST 01 00000000 )R-006979 95/05/17 N 2060 WEBBER HILLS RD 01 54718151 )R-006980 95/05/17 N 4590 NORTH ARM DR W 01 54710151 )R-006981 95/05/18 N 996 NORTH ARM DR 29 15330352 )R-006982 95/05/18 N 1125 WILLOW DR N 27 00000000 )R-006983 95/05/18 M 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE 11 00000000 )R-006984 95/05/18 N 3780 BAYSIDE RD 01 35595900 )R-006985 95/05/18 N 4600 DAYSI^^E RD 01 57300355 )R-006986 95/05/19 N 1305 ORONO LA 01 27844792 )R-006987 95/05/19 N 3500 DAYSIDE RD 34 14710390 )R-006988 95/05/22 N 2875 DEER RUN TR 01 18947570 )R-006989 95/05/19 N 60 STUBBS DAY RD S 11 14734954 )R-006990 95/05/19 N 4040 WATERTOWN RD 01 29337200 )R-006991 95/05/19 N 345 SrUIWG HILL RD 02 25464483 !!IU, tjUN 1, 19"5, 4:13 PMMJMERICAL LISTING MAY 1995 PAGE 2ERMIT NDR ISSUED CANCEL AODR NDR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY'R-006992•R-006993•R-006994R-006995R-006996>R-006997•R-006998•R-006999iR-007000'R-007002 iR-007003 •R-007004 •R-007005 )R-007006 •R-007007 )R-007011 'R-007012 )R-007013 I2C 95/05/22 N 2821 CASCO POINT RD 06 0000000095/05/22 N 2520 CASCO POINT RU 22 1472411895/05/24 N 1590 NORTH ARM DR 02 1474807795/05/23 N 255 LANDMARK DR 06 0000000095/05/23 N 15 BROWN RD S 06 0000000095/05/26 N 3580 WAYZATA BLVD 24 3446129995/05/24 N 537 PARK LA 31 0000000095/05/24 N 356 WESTLAKE ST 11 1473339795/05/24 N 2773 CASCO POINT RD 11 1472653995/05/24 N 2990 SOMERSET LA 01 37354663 95/05/25 N 2515 KELLY AVE 24 24724959 95/05/25 N 2760 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24432921 95/05/26 N 635 FERNDALE RD N 05 14747121 95/05/26 N 3120 BAYSIDE RD 11 00000000 95/05/30 N 3500 BAYSIDE RD 23 14718390 95/05/30 N 510 BARRETT AVE 15 00000000 95/05/31 N 1620 TONKAVIEW LA 01 25612854 95/05/31 N 1290 WILDHURST TR 11 00000000 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. PETER BOYER CONSTRUCTIONCOUNTRYSIDE HTG & COOLINGPLYMOUTH ROOFING SMITH HF ROOFING SUMMIT HOME CENTER WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC KAL'S PLUMBING & HEATING OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONKAYLOR800.00FRAHM.00HAGLUND40,000.00CASEY3,000.00EISS4.600.001.873.00OLSON3,600.00ANDERSON2,750.00ERICKSON2,575.00•3,800.00PONZETTI9,995.00 11,000.00 JACOBSON 34,000.00 ANDERSON 2,000.00 BANGERT .00 JAFFRAY .00 COURNEYA 7,200.00 BIRKELAND 5,500.00 /• *ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES CX)LLECTED REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 'JATE OF RUN 06/01/95 MAY 1995PERMIT TYPEUser DefinedVARIANCECUPSub-total Crand-total QTY000*0**PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO *♦ iit #-- CURRENT RANGE - 05/01/95 - 05/31/95BASE FEE0.00 0.00 0.00*0.00**VALUATION0.000.000.00*0.00**PLAN REVIEW0.000.000.00*0.00**PA6B:REQUESTER: CAROLEQTY516«6**-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 05/01/94 - 05/31/94BASE FEE1.050.00 200.00 1,250.00*1,250.00**VALUATION0.000.000.00*0.00**PLAN REVIBN0.000.000.00*0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 06/01/95 '** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 05/01/95 TO 05/31/95 PAGBt 1 REQUESTER: CAR6LB BASE FEE USER 0.00 REPORT TOTAL 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 \ - POTITS UVMJFD/FVES WUsPrrCDVOllT NMiT. m’RMTinS-l IE OF RUIl 06/01/95 YEAR-TO-DWE;kmit type lilding ;l family -new IPLEX-NEW •-ADD/REMODEL •-ACC STRUCTURE •MO/PRINCIPAL >M-ADD/REMODEL:mo IST-ADD/REMODEL •-LAND ALT .AN REVIEW ONLY:mo-accessory c/garages lb-total 'chanical•:ating systems IR CONDITIONING )OD STOVE/FLUE [REPLACE i*:ntilation 'IEL STORAGE AS LINE INSPECT UCT WORK ONLY I-:M0VE OIL TANK NDEPINED ub-total lumbing IXTURES ATER METER tlDEFINED ub-total owor *e Water •EWER CONNECTION /ATER CONNECTION lEW SEPTIC SYSTE »RNFLD «t/OR TANK :AC only :i:WER & WATER ‘ub-total • ign •ERMANENT/POSTED ER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY :ub-total •'ire •IREWORKS QTY 13 0 88 9 6 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 129* tt*i* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGEI 1REQUESTER: CAROLS-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 05/31/95 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 05/31/94BASE FEE 19,276 0 17,309 1,504 330 2,420 30 56 72 0 30 237 41,345 . 00 .00 .25 . 00 .00 .50 .00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .25 .75* VALUATION 3.994.978.00 0.00 1.962.967.00 267.900.00 0.00 382.542.00 0.00 1,800.00 5,000.00 550,000.00 0.00 15,225.00 7,100,312.00* PLAN REVIEW 12,529 0 9,420 975 0 111 0 36 46 1,423 0 154 24,697 .43 .00 .35 .00 .00 .15 .00 .89 .80 .10 .00 .21 .01* QTY 14 1 71 7 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 108* BASE FEE 10,835 15 12,350 724 230 477 0 0 0 0 0 905 33,536 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50* VALUATION 4,225,120.00 500.00 1,449,994.80 61,600.00 0.00 37.300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91.500.00 5,866,014.80* PLAN REVIEW 12,242.80 0.00 6,666.12 470.60 0.00 81.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 553.15 20,014.57* 28 2,126.88 150,006.00 0.00 37 3,572.39 271,700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 195.08 11,901.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 2,600.00 0.00 16 835.00 52,000.00 0.00 16 1,070.00 75,189.16 0.00 Ml 1 35.00 1,200.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,150.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 2,000.00 0.00 1 35.00 200.00 0.00 5 175.00 3,700.00 0.00 5 175.00 4,730.00 0.00 2 97.50 6,000.00 0.00 3 105.00 3,200.00 0.00 2 70.00 1,500.00 0.00 1 247.50 19,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 55*3,559.38*239,136.00*0.00*70*5,284.97*375,740.16*0.00* 46 3,514.15 251,105.00 0.00 56 3,702.90 250,955.86 0.00 2 314.00 0.00 0.00 3 705.00 0.00 0 • 00 1 35.00 400.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 49*3,063.15*251,505.00*0.00*59*4,487.98*250,955.86*0.00* 3 170.00 0.00 0.00 6 210.00 0.00 0.00 0^ 0^ 0^ 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 2 200.00 0.00 0.00 4 400.00 0.00 0.00 0\ 0\ 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0*00 0^ 0^ 0^ 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 4,800.00 0.00 0.00 0^ 0^ 0^ 1 7* 70.00 490.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 1 20* 70.00 5,515.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 1 1 1 3* 35.00 35.00 30.00 100.00* 1,500.00 400.00 0.00 1,900.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 1 2 5* 70.00 39.00 60.00 169.00* 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PEW-llTS ISSULD/FEfiS COUECriD YEAR-'iV>UATE•:port nbr. bprmtiss-1ME OF RUN 06/01/95RRMIT TYPE tib-total oer Defined AND ALTERATION REE REMOVAL ETAINING WALLS AWN SPRINKLER ub*total •rand-total QTY1* 6 4 1 0 11* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONOCURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 05/31/95BASE FEE 50.00* 330.00 120.00 100.00 0.00 550.00* VALUATION0,00* 3.000. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.000. 00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 255 * t 49,950.28** 7,675,933.00** 24,697.01** QTY0* 4 2 0 3 9* 271** PAGE: 2REQUESTER! CAROLEPREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 05/31/94BASE FEE 0.00* 250.00 60.00 0.00 105.00 415.00* VALUATION0.00*0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* PLAN REVIEW O.OQ*0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00* 49,408.45** 6,493,910.82** 20,014.57** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED EPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 * * * * *PERMIT FEE YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT *****PAGE: 'ATE OF RUN 06/01/95 CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 05/31/95 REQUESTER:CAROLE BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER 6 WATER USER SIGN FIRE ^ASE FEE 41,345.75 3,559.30 3,863.15 490.00 550.00 100.00 50.00 'LAN REVIEW 24,697.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •URCHARGE 3,320.75 120.69 127.46 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,IC. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ••AC 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NVESTIGATION 587.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 lAIL IN 51.20 19.35 'ERMIT TOTAL 71,650.51 3,731.27 4,009.96 493.50 550.00 100.00 50.00 ZONING■iPoR? w„* issued /eees collectedME OP RliU 06/01/95 YEAR-TO-DATERRMIT TYPE«er Defined (JBDIVISION ARIANCE UP KETCH PLAN ARIANCE/CUP PPEAL ub-total rand-total QTY ♦ PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 05/31/95BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLEQTY 5 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 6153,250.00 0.00 0.00 2251,075.00 0.00 0.00 83600.00 0.00 0.00 12675.00 0.00 0.00 31100.00 0.00 0.00 031*7,900.00*0.00*0.00*40* 31**7,900.00**0.00**0.00**40** -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 05/31/94BASE FEE 7.675.00 4.475.00 1.250.00 200.00 425.00 0.00 14,025.00* 14,025.00** VALUATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 06/01/95 RASE FEE USER 7,900.00 REPORT TOTAL 7,900.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 rNVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 7,900.00 7,900.00 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT •* CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 05/31/95 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 19« RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIESJanuary February March Apri I June July August Septenber October November December YTD TotalsSpring ParkPlan Review 0.00 5,416.77 2,016.97 0.00 2,027.67 9,461.41Inspections225.00 210.00 75.00 180.00 90.00 780.00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 125.00TOTAL250.00 5,651.77 2,116.97 205.00 2,142.67 10,366.0No. Plan Reviews 0 S 6 0 3 17No. Inspections 15 14 5 12 6 52 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 0.00 1,075.43 143.35 32.20 816.56 2,067.54 Inspections 135.00 45.00 105.00 45.00 75.00 405.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 125.00 TOTAL 160.00 1,145.43 273.35 102.20 916.56 2,597.54 No. Plan Reviews 0 1 3 1 4 9 No. Inspections 9 3 7 3 5 27 410.00 6,797.20 2,390.32 307.20 3,059.23 • I ‘ J * s \ - A\ \Wi,fw Thorns B »ftcH, Pm d . SUPOffimworr NEAL J UPrSON ASSIST AKT TO SUPERtNTENDE>T Orono Public SCHCX>LS D istrict Office • 685 OLD CRYSTAL B ay R oad N orth fK). Box 46 • Long Lake . Minnesota 55356-0046 • 612.449.8300 612.449.8399 Fax A n Equal OPPOfTTUNTTY EMPLOYER June 12, 1995 Chief Stephen Sullivan Orono Police Departnent 2730 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Chief Sullivan: The Orono School District, both faculty and staff, truly appreciates the diligent service of Officer Scott Boris to our school community. Scott provides support and leadership relative to our efforts to preserve a quality learning environment. He is a key player in the reconciliation of conflicts that impair a focus on learning and in the coordination of services associated with intervention. He is responsive, takes initiative and follows through routinely. Scott's efforts have resulted in the establishment of a productive rapport with students, parents and staff members alike. Scott steadfastly promotes the expectations of the School District and the community; while at the same time, he consistently demonstrates a true sensitivity for the needs of individuals. Also important, Scott portrays a positive image of law enforcement that is respected by students and that provides both short and long term benefits to your department and to our entire community. Scott Boris has been extremely successful in defining and executing his role as liaison officer. His performance has exceeded our expectations! Our hope is that the Orono Police Department and the Orono School District will continue to cooperate in the maintenance of Scott's placement in this key position. These brief remarks provide a summary of our evaluation of the liaison officer program in general and the work of Officer Scott Boris in particular. I request that note be taken of these remarks at the time of an annual review for Officer Boris. Cordially, ^ Thomas B. Mich, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools TBM;eaz as^ciation of mefropo itan municipa ities June 23.1995 Dear Mayor Many critical issues affecting metropolitan cities will probably be dealt with in the 1996 Legislative session. Talk of pro perty *** reform and elimmanoo of or reductions in LGA/HACA and removal of educanon financing from local property taxes could be a major issue. Lack of adequate rtansportationAraittit funding has reached a critical point Land use controls, regional blueprint implementatioo and modifications to the cost allor^i^ system for the regional wastewater treatment system could be on the front burner as well. We need your views and input on these and other important issues as well to help sh^ie and establi^ legislative policy and directiem for the Assodaden of Metropolitan Mumcipalities for the 1996 sessirai. To provide a forum for this input and discussion, we arc holding our 10th annual series of Outreach Breakfast meetings for you and other city ofTicials. The breakfast meeting for your area is scheduled for Wednesday July 12 at 7:30 ajn., in the WcUmgtai Room of the Ramada Plaza (formerly Radisstm Minnetonka) in Minnetonka. The Ramada Plaza is located on the southeast comer of Highway 12/1-394 and the Ridgedale Drive interchange. Your input on these issues is crucial and we invite you to review the enclosed Issues paper to help focus your thinking. This will be an informal gathering and we look for a good exchange of idca^ This get-together can also be an avenue for you to tell us what you'd like to see the AMM do more or less of in the way of member services and how we can build a better rapport between city officials/AMM and metro legislato rs. We hope you plan to attend your area breakfast by making reservations tow. We would ask that managers and mayors make this information and invitation available to dty counefl members and interested staff persons. As always, if you have any questions, please call the AMM office. PLEASE R.S.V.P. TO LAURIE AUDETTE, 490-3301 BY NOON MONDAY. JULY 10, Sincerely, Joan Campbell AMM President Minneapolis CouncUmember Ann Lenezewski AMM Board Member Bloomington CouncUmember Jim Prosser AMM Board Member Richfield Manager 3490 lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301 Issues for discussion 1. Property Tax Rcfonn/LGA-HACA For sevenl years the Governor and Ugislatute have been discussing major chan^ in the property tax - local government funding sys^ with the g^ of providing more funding for educatioD ynrf property tax reduction. Just in diis last session: - A property tax freeze passed the Senate - A ^^tutional amendment to eliminate school funding from local property taxes passed the House . u - Bills io eliminate city HACA were heard in committees of both houses - Major tax refonn bills were heard in both houses TTie Governor and various commissions he has established during his tenure as governor have recommended total eliinination or major reductions in LG A The busi^ss conMnumty through its main associations (Minnesota Chamber, Business Partnership and the Minnesota Taxpayers Association) has tended to support the Governor ’s thrust Now that tte bus^ss community has accompUshed major changes in workers compensation, its major legislative focus wiU be to reduce C/I property taxes. 1996 could well be a watershed year for property tax - local government [“"***"8 modirications. Sweeping changes can be used as campaign rhetoric and the eff^of such changes (some which may have negative political implications) would not be felt until after the 1996 election. Please think about how cities and the AMM can best position ourselves to be a meaningful participant during these discussions in the 1996 session. 2. Transportation/Transit Funding has u give and soon! Major highway projects state-wide and in the m^ area such as 1-495,1-35W and Hwy. 100 North have been shelv^ for the foreseeable Transit in the metro area, both regular route and metro mobility, is being pared b^ Many regular transit routes have been eliminated and many more are scheduled There is even serious discussion of eliminating all regular route transit outsi^ of the 1-494- 696 beltway. Fares will have to be raised which will lead to less bus ridership and more congestion on the main highways. Reduced public transportation could also negauvely unpact the region’s efforts to provide more affordable housing in the developmg suburbs since lower income people tend to be more public transit dependent Again, please give some thought as to the role metro dty ollldals and the A^ can play in trying to break the funding "log jam" which has dominated discussions during the last three sessions. This disagreement between highway advocates (mainly rural) and transit advocates (mainly metro) has resulted in inadequate binding for both highways and transit. Everyone loses! 3. Land Use Rcgulation/Urban Service Area Expansion I jinH Use Regulation and development sprawl could also be issues during the 1996 sessio^ Bills were introduced in the 1995 session that would have virtually frozen the MUSA line in its current configuration. While perhaps weU intentioned. these bills provided no controls beyond the 7-coundes and preventing growth widiin the metro area would almost surely lead^ to more development in adjacent Counties which would exacerbate the sprawl situation The developers and realtors are also suggesting that unreaso na ble local controls are die mjor of housing costs in developing communities and are quiedy suggesting more oversight of local land use regulatory authority at either the metro or state level. The Met is fifn sponsoring a study of the cost allocation system for the rnetropolitan wastewater treatment system which could lead to the return of a sub-regional cost allocation system that could produce some tension. While somewhat indirect, there b a relationship between all thee Issue and concerns and they could ’’come together** at the Legblature. How should the AMM, with rs on all side of these issues, proceed policy wise for the 1996 aesdon?I r-^ 111 association ofmerropolitanmunicipaiities BULLE DATE:June 14.1995 TO:Mayors. Managers/Administrators. Legislative Contacts FROM:Vem Peterson, Roger Peterson, Cheryl Budewitz RE:1995 Legislative Summary Enclosed is a Policy Narrative and Policy Success Report which provide a summary wrap- up of the 1995 Legislative Session and the issues affecting AMM cides. Approximately two-thirds of all AMM policy was cither fully or partially accomplished during the session. Of the 64 total AMM action policies: # # 33 were passed or upheld fully (52%); 8 were partially accomplished (13%); 17 were not discussed or the issue did not pass the first committee (27%); 6 faUed (9%). 3490 lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301 association of metropolitan municipalities POLICY NARRATIVE 1995 Legislative Session CONTENTS L METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT Tax Base Revitalization Fund (1) lAvable Communities Demonstration Account (1) Local Housing Incentives Account (3) Met Council Reports (4) Miscellaneous Provisions (4) n. OMNIBUS TAX BILL-------•••••*•••••••••••.4 Local Governrr.ent Aid & Homestead Credit Aid (4) Aid Distribution & Service Delivery Study (4) Board of Government Innovation (5) Class Rate Change (5) Transit Zone C// Tax Rate - Metro Area (5} Property Tax Refund as Deduc*^ r. Tax Statement (6) m. TAX INCREMENT FINANCrv^ it (F)*•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••********* LG A!HAC A Penalty Option (6) Soils Condition District (7) Hazardous Substance Subdistrict (7) Pooling (8) But For Test (8) Annual Disclosure - Reporting & Enforcement (8) Clean-up Cost Recovery - Extension of District (9) Economic Development Districts (9) Parcels not Included in Districts (9) Special Laws (10) rv. TRANSPORTATION Highways (10) Transit (10) Noise Regulations (10) V. METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT . ZONING ISSUES - PROCESS TIME..........................................................12 Vn. 800 MHz RADIO SYSTEM---------------•••••••••• VHL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING FINANCE*------------------14 Development of Trade!Economic Development (DIED): Budget (14) Department of Economic Security: Budget (15) Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA): Budget (15) DC. ISSUES NOT PASSED IN 1995 ••••••• ••• Housing as a Regional System (16) Codification of Regional Blueprint (16) Land Stewardship Land Use Planning Bill (16) Direct Election of Met Council Members (16) Property Tax Rate Freeze (16) Municipal Bond Interest Taxation (17) Beg for YourLGAIHACA (17) School Property Tax Constitutional Amendment (17) Municipal Tort Liability Increase (17) Gas Tax & Transit Funding (17) * Special thanks to Publicorp, Inc., for its summary contributions. (I) METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT (SJ^. 1019, Laws 1995, Chapter 255) This act establishes the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. Under the act, three separate accounts or programs are established with each account having specific purposes and specific revenue sources. (Please see graphic on page 2) City participation is voluntary. However, if a city does not participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account, it is not eligible for funds the three accounts or the pollution clean-up fund, which is administered by the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). The Met Council will establish criteria and guidelines for the Livable Communities Fund and the grants and loans process, as well as an annual plan for distribution of the funds and an annual usage report. Tax Base Revitalization Fund Grants for polluted land clean-up will be issued in the metro area. The Met Council will set priorities for the use of the funds if there are a great number of requests. Grants will be awarded for qualified sites that provide the higtest return in public benefits. No more than half of the funds can go to a single city and no more than 75 percent to projects in first-class cities. Cities may use the grants for the local match requirements for projects funded under the DTED contamination clean-up grant program. The local match payment is reduced to 12 percent (was 18 percent) of the clean-up costs. Livable Communities Demonstration Account The Met Council may levy a property tax equal to 50 percent of the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) levy for taxes payable in 1995, indexed for market growth. The account will receive an annual HACA payment equal to 50 percent of the current MMCD HACA payment Grants and loans will be provided to participating cities for projects that meet specific guidelines. The projects should: • Interrelate development or redevelopment and transit; • Interrelate affordable housing and employnant opportunities; • Interrelate development or redevelopment that mixes incomes of residents; • Intensify land use that leads to more compact development; • Encourage public infrastructure investments which connect urban neighborhoods and suburban communities, as well as provide project area residents with opportunities for private sector employment 1995 Policy Narrative 1995 Policy Narrative k Local Housing Incentives Account A city has until November 15 of each year to decide to participate or not. If a city docs elect to participate, it is eligible to receive grants and loans for pollution clean-up and demonstration projects, as well as matching funds from the local housing incentives account The Met Council may give consideration to a city’s participation in the local housing incentives program when making discretionary funding decisions. The following is an outline of the process once a city opts to participate: (1) January 15,1996. City negotiates affordable and life cycle housing goals (2) July 1,1996. City develops an action plan, (3) July 1 of each year. County calculates municipality market value base amount and funds available for the local housing incentives account (4) Met Council notifies city of its affordable and life-cycle housing opportunities amount The amount is the lesser of the following: • Four percent of the residential homestead value x loc^ tax rate; • Residential homestead value in excess of the market value base amount (2 times average) x local tax rate. (5) City uses local funds and available Met Council funds to meet its goals. (6) If a city has not met its goal and not spent 85 percent of its affordable and life cycle housing opportunities amount in the previous year by 1998, it may: Distribute the funds to the Met Council to put in the local initiatives account; Distribute the funds to the city or county HRA to create housing opportunities; City may join together with adjacent cities to provide housing opportunities. Cities must match the Met Council funds dollar-by-doUar. The Met Council must give priority to cities that: Receive less from fiscal disparities than it contributes by more than $200 per household; Demonstrate that the project will link jobs to housing; Provide matching funds from sources other than the affordable and life-cycle opportunities amount. If a city elects not to participate for some years, but then elects to participate, the municipality must establish what it agrees to spend on affordable and life-cycle housing, or agree to disttibute to the local housing incentives account. 1995 Policy Narrative This amount is equivalent to what it would have spent on affordable and life-cycle housing had goals been established under this section for the period in which it was not participating. The Met Council will determine which investments count toward the required cumulative amount by comparing the municipality to participating municipalities similar in terms of stage of development and demographics. Met Council Reports The Met Council must file an annual report with the Legislature outlining the participating and non-participating cities, as well as an annual comprehensive report card on affordable and life-cycle housing in the metro area by city. In addition, a report must be filed wnth the Legislature by Jan. 15,2003 which includes the funds accounts and how they were used. Another report must be filed by Jan 15,1996 describing the probable development patterns in the metro area by the year 2020. Miscellaneous Provisions The starting time for the city of Bloomington to begin repaying the fiscal di^aritics pool for interest on highway bonds sold in conjunction with die Mall of America is delayed. Also, the 1:1 housing replacement of low income housing for first-class cities is repealed. An urban homesteading program is established to encourage higher income persons to buy homes in areas that are in transition toward blight and poverty. Income tax benefits will also be provided to eligible persons. (II) OMNIBUS TAX BILL ______________________ (HF. 1864, Laws 1995, Chapter 264) Local Government Aid/Homestead Credit Aid (Article 8, Section 15) Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) was reduced by $16 million in 1996 for cities, counties, towns and special districts. The city share of the reduction is slightly less than $8 million. The cut is for 1996 only and the HACA will be restored in 1997 unless the Legislature acts next year to make the cut permanenL The reduction is limited within individual cities to .45% of the 1995 net tax capacity, which will benefit a few very property-poor cities. Aid Distribution and Service Delivery Study (Article 8, Section 22) The Legislative Commission on Plarming and Fiscal Policy is directed to establish a subcommittee by July 1, 1995 to study: (1) Alternative methods of distributing general-purpose aids to units of local govemmenL (2) Approaches to maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of local government and service delivery. 1995 Policy Narrative Cities and counties shall provide information and analysis as requested within 60 days of the request If the city or county fails to comply, the subcommittee may recommend that the Legislature impose a financial penalty. The subcommittee report is due Feb. 1.1996 and will make recommendations for reform in aid distribution and government service delivery systems. Ironically, this provision creates an unfunded mandate with the threat of a penalty to supply unspecified data and analysis. Whereas Sections 2 and 23 create a major study of unjfunded mandates and their necessity! Board of Government Innovation (Article 8, Sections 2 23) Of the HACA cut, $2 million is aHocated for the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation for 1996 and 1997. Fifty percent of the funds go for aids to cooperating and combining local government units. The remainder is for general grants. A number of changes were made to the application and grant process to ensure that grant funds arc needed not merely replacements for another existing resource. Finally, the board is directed to do a major assessment and study of unfunded state mandates, their impact, inconsistencies or contradictions and relevancy. A report with recommendations is due Jan. 15,1996. Class Rate Change (Article 3, Section 10) Three property class rates were changed. They will have a small impact and will only create minor property tax shifts: (1) Seosonctl Recreation Property - Non-conimerciaU For ta x a ble value under S72,000, the rate changes from 2% to 1.9% for taxes payable in 1997 and 1.8% in 1998. The value in excess of $72,000 remains at 2.5%. (2) Manirfactured Home Parks: The class rate will remain at 2% for 1996 and thereafter, rather than increasing to 2.3%. (3) Certain Apartment Property: Class rates for apartments in cities with populations of less than 5000 that are outside the seven-county metro area or the nine contiguous counties and that are more than 15 rrules from a city with a population over 5000, will be reduced to 2.3% from 3.4% for taxes payable in 1^6 and thereafter. Transit Zone C/I Tax Rate - Metro Area (Article 3, Sections 9 & 27) Provides that a transit zone is the area within one-quarter mile of a bus route which has certain specified hours of service within the metro urban service area. If construction funds are committed to a light rail transit route, that route shall be considered to be a transit zone. 1995 Policy Narrative Also provides that the Met Council is responsible for maintaining a detailed map of transit zones and providing the map to all assessors in the metro area. The initia l maps will be produced by Jan. 1, 1996. Any class 3 A commcrcial/industrial structure, constructed under an initial building permit issued after Jan. 2, 1996, located in a transit zone and within a school district, and not primarily used for retail or transient lodging purposes, shall have a four percent class rate on its market value in excess of $100,000. (The current class rate on that property is 4.6%.) The four percent rate shall also apply to any new improvements added under an inirial building permit issued after Jan. 2,1996, to an existing qualified commercialAndustrial structure located in a transit zone. These changes are effective for the 1997 assessment, taxes payable in 1998. Property Tax Refund as Deduction on Tax Statement (Article 4) The regular circuit breaker and special targeting property tax refunds for homeowners will be deducted on the taxation notices. Money will be paid by the state directly to county treasurers and be a permanent open appropriation. 1998 is the first year of the new payment method, with 1997 as a transition year. (ni) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF)______________ (HJ^. 1864, Laws 1995, Chapter 264) The Omnibus Tax bill includes an economic development article (Article 5) that contains several TIF amendments. The amendments include: LGA & HACA Penalty Option A major issue surrounding the legislative TIF discussion has been the issue of local accountability. The imposition of the LGA/HACA penalty has been viewed as a means to illustrate local and state financial impacts of TIF. The Legislature has been reluctant to grant exemptions from LGA/HACA without imposing such measures as a local share, a housing development requirement or county board approval of di' ricL The 1995 Legislature adopted a provision that permits a city to choose to pay a local share for a portion of the district costs. The details of the local share are the following: • The amount of the local contribution must be made out of unrestricted money (general fund, tax levy, or a federal or a state grant of authority or municipality); • The local contribution may not be made, directly or indirectly, with TIF or developer payments; • The local contribution must be used to pay project costs and cannot be used for: (1) general government purposes; (2) Improvements or costs that the municipality planned to incur. 1995 Policy Narrative • The municip ality or authority may request contributions firom the other local government entities that will benefit from the district’s aenvities. The contributions count toward the local share. • If the state contributes to the project costs through a direct grant or similar incentive, the required local contribution is reduced by 50% of the amount of the grant or incentive. • The authority must annually submit a report regarding its local share to the commissioner of revenue. The amount of the local match is based on the type of die district. The authority or municipality must: • Elect at the time of district approval to use the option, • In each year make a qualifying contribution equal to: (1) About 10% of the increment for an economic development, housing or renewal and renovation district (2) About 7 1/2% of the increment for a mined underground space district redevelopment district hazardous substance subdistrict or soils district • The maximum contribution for all districts in the municipality is 2% of the city’s net tax capacity. The local option is effective for new districts and those certified after June 30,1994. The city must choose for districts certified prior to July 1,1995, if it will use the option or pay the penalty. The choice must be made by Dec. 31,1995. Soils Condition District The soils district has been amended to limit the district to the presence of hazardous substance, pollution or contarmnants that require removal or remedial action. Tax increment from the district may be used only to: (1) Acquire parcels; (2) Pay for the cost of removal or remedial action; (3) Pay for administrative costs, including the action response preparation costs. Hazardous Substance Subdistrict A hazardous substance subdistrict is defined in the definition section by a cross-reference to the references in 469.175 subdivision 7. An extended subdistrict is defined to be a hazardous substance subdistrict, but only after the overlying TDF district has been terminated. 1995 Policy Narrative The definition of capttued value in a hazardous substance subdistrict and not an extended subdistrict is the amount by which the original net tax capacity of the portion of TIF district overlying the subdistrict exceeds the original net tax capacity of the subdistrict. In other words, during the dual district period, the captured value is the difference between the base values. Pooling The amount of an increment that can be expended outside a non-redevelopment district is reduced to 20%. The new percentage will apply to districts for which the request for certification was made after June 30.1995. But For Test The “but for test” has been expanded to include a market value analysis. The analysis must show that the market value of the site attribution to development not receiving TIF assistance would be less than the increase on market value estimated to result from the proposed TTF development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan. The market value test does not apply to qualified housing districts. Annual Disclosure • Reporting & Enforcement The amendments regarding annual disclosure reporting, as well as enforcement of the act, transfer duties and responsibilities firom the Department of Revenue to the state auditor. The major components of the amendments are: • The annual disclosure statement must report the mount of the increment paid to other government bodies, the amount paid for administrative costs, and the amount of the increment spent outside the district If option (a) is selected for fiscal disparities, the report must indicate the amount of the property tax increase. • The annual financial report must include the amount budgeted and expended for the following additional categories: (1) Parking facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks; (2) Public park facilities, facilities for social, recreational or conference facilities. • The reporting requirements arc extended to pre-1979 districts. In addition to the individual district reports, the city must report to the state auditor for the entire municipality the following: (1) Amount of any payments and the value of in-kind benefits, such as physical improvements and the use of building space that are financed with TIF and are provided to another governmental unit during the preceding calendar year. 8 1995 Policy Narrative Clean-up Cost Recovery - Extension of District An authority may. with the approval of the municipality, extend the durarion of the district beyond the statutory lirruts if the following circumstances apply: • After the district ’s establishment, contaminants, hazard substances or other materials arc found in the district; • The authority elects not to create a hazardous substance subdistrict; The municipality pays for clean-up from the general fund or other non-Tl^* jc venue. If the district qualifies under the three factors, the district can extend the duration the lesser of: (1) Ten years after the district would otherwise terminate; (2) The number of additional years needed to collect increment equal to the clean-up costs paid by the municipality. Clean-up costs are: (1) Limited to actual costs of removal and remediation. Clean-up costs do not include: (1) Financing or interest costs; (2) Testing and engineering costs. Clean-up costs must be reduced by any amounts recovered form private or responsible parties. Economic Development Districts The provision that permits a small city (5,000 population or less) to establish a commercial facility with an economic development district has been eliminated. An economic development district for which certification is requested after June 30,1995, may expend increment to pay for site preparation and public improvements if: • Eighty percent or more of the district ’s area includes bedrock; • The estimated cost of the physical preparation of the site exceeds the land ’s fair market value prior to completion of the preparation; • The increment is only used to prepare the site and pay reasonable administrative costs. Parcels Not Included in Districts The “20 year’’ exclusion regarding parcels formerly in an economic development district has been deleted from the act The section, however, has been amended to prohibit parcels classified under the green acres or agricultural preserves provision from being included in TIF districts. 1995 Policy Narrative The amendment differentiates by regions of the state-metropolitan and Greater Minnesota. The amendments state a parcel cannot be part of a district if during any of the prior five years, it was classified under chapter 273.111 or 273.112 (Green Acres) or Chapter 473H (Agricultural Preserves). In Greater Minnesota, the prohibition does not triply if the parcel will be used for manufacturing purposes. Special Laws A general law amendment regarding special laws that extend the duration of a district is beyond statutory terms in the TIF amendments. If a sp.x:ial law extenu^ the limits of an existing district or a new district, the city must: Elect to pay the LGA/HACA penalty for the additional years or request the school district to approve the adjusted tax capacity. (Adjusted tax capj*city iiKans that the district ’s captured value is used in calculating the school aid formula. Therefore, the school district would receive less state aid and more revenue locally). Request approval of the county board and school district of the local law. The election must be made prior to requesting local approvals. (IV) TRANSPORTATION (Laws 1995, Chapter 265) Highways No changes were made to highway funding and there are no additional gas taxes or increased fees. Mn/Dot was appropriated $2,584,427,000. There is a shortage of funds. Transit Transit funding was increased significandy from last biennium but not to the level needed to stay even with service demands. The biennium funding for general transit and metro mobility was $84 million. This is up from $69 billion in the last biennium but down from the $93 million requested or the $89 million budget arion by the governor. An interesting twist is the Met Council is authorized to spend at a $90 million level the llrst year of the biennium. This may present an interesting dilemma during the 1996 session, rince a sizable supplemental appropriation will be needed to keep transit afloat in F.Y. 1997. Noise Regulations The law provides that no noise standards shall apply to an existing or newly constructed segment of a highway, provided that all reasonably available noise mitigation measures, as approved by the commissioners of the Department of Transportation and Pollution Control Agency, are employed to abate noise. 1995 Policy Narrative This language basicaUy resolves problems encountered by ci’,% county and state road construction noise, as well as potential noise-based lawsuits involving highway construction projects. Mn/Dot is required to conduct a study of noise bamer needs and report back to the Legislature in 1996. (V) METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT (HF. 833. Laws 1995. Chapter 176) This chapter amends several provisions of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, which was first adopted in 1976. They arc the first significant amendments to the act since its adoption. *^fhis bill was sponsored by the Met Council and its major elements are. (1) Incorporation of Water Management Plans. Water management plans prepared by cities pursuant to MS 103B.235 must be incorporated into the land use plan section of a comprehensive plan and be submitted to the Met Council for review and comment Formerly, these plans were submitted to Water Management Organizations (WMOs) only. (2) Ten-year Review of Comp Plans. Metro area units of government must review and, as necessary, amend their comprehensive plans by Dec. 31,1998, and at least every 10 years thereafter. Such review and, if necessary, amendment shaU ensure that the fiscal devices and local controls arc not in conflict with the comp plans. (3) Merriam Amendment is Repealed. That amendment stated that the zoning ordinances supersede the comp plan if there is a conflict (4) Holding Zones are Allowed. An official control or fiscal device shall not be considered to be in conflict with a comp plan if such official control or fiscal device is adopted to ensure the plaimed orderly and staged development of urbanization or redevelopment areas designated in the comp plan. (5) Uniformity of Controls/Fiscal Devices. After August 1,1995, a city is prohibited firom adopting an official control or fiscal device which is in conflict with its plan. (6) Nine Months to Ame.id Ordinances. After approval and adoption of a revised comp plan, a local government unit has nine months to amend its ordina nces (same as current law). (7) Amended Controls go to Met Council for Information. Copies of amended official controls or fiscal devices must be submitted to the Met Council for information (but not approval). A 1995 Policy Narrative (8) Extensions May be Granted. The Met Council may grant extensions to the Dec. 31. 1998 deadline in order to allow the local government unit to complete the review and amendments as required by this bill. (9) The key dates of the bill arc: A. August 1.1995 Effective date of bill. After August 1,1995, local government units shall not adopt official controls which conflict with tteir comp plans. B. Dec. 31.1998 Review. By this date and every 10 years thereafter, each local govemment unit shall review and, if necessary, amend its comp plan. The Met Council may grant extensions to the Dec. 31,1998 deadline. C. Within nine months Amendment process. Within nine months after local govemment unit adoption of comp plan (MS 473.865, subdivision 3) if an official control conflicts with a comp plan as a result of an amendment to the plan, the official control shall be amended by the unit within nine months. (10) Assistance Available if Needed. The Met Council must consult with local government units to evaluate the need for technical and financial assistance to implement this bill and report its findings to the Legislature by Jan. 15,19%. (VI) ZONING ISSUES - PROCESS TIME_______________ (Laws 1995, Chapter 248, Article 18) New time limits are established for certain permits and actions by govemmem.,! units of the state including local, metro and state agencies. An agency must approve or deny within 60 days a written request relating to zoning, septic systems or expansion of the metro urban service area for a permit, license or other governmental approval of an action. Failure to deny within 60 days constitutes an approval. Denials must be stated in wrir'ng with reasons. The 60 days begins upon receipt of a written request containing all information required by law or previously adopted rule, ordinance or policy. An agency has up to 10 days to make a written request for incomplete information. If an action requires approval of more than one state agency in the executive branch, the time period begins for all executive branch agencies when the first agency has received all pertinent data. 1995 Policy Narrative A The time limit is extended if a state statute, federal law or court order requires a process prior to approval and the time periods tor the stated process make it impossible to act in 60 days. Tune is extended if prior approval is required by a state or federal agency. Fmally, an agency may extend the timeline by providing written notice to the applicant The notification reasons and anticipated length of extension must be included and may not exceed 60 days unless approved by the applicant With agreement by an applicant a process such as a complex or controversial rezoning ran be extended beyond the 60-day time limit This provisior* may prevent premature denials by agencies faced with the more difficult actions. The act is effective July 1,1995 for any aRjlicablc request submitted after that date. (VII) 800 MHz RADIO SYSTEM (Laws 1995, Chapter 195) An independent Metropolitan Radio Board is established to supervise and oversee the first-phase planning and implementation of a shared metro-wide radio system. The board will ensure the operation and maintenance of the system in such a way that subsequent phases can be addrri. Staff will be provided by the Met Council until user fees become available July 1997. The board’s plan for the first-phase backbone of the region-wide system must be based on Mn/Dot’s recommendations. Mn/Dot is directed to contract for construction or lease of the first phase and is responsible for ownership and (^ration. The total initial cost is about $30 million. The backbone system will serve Mn/Dot, Metro Transit, metro area highway patrol and possibly the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Counties must do a county-wide plan including cities (which must cooperate). First-class cities will do an individual plan. Participation in the 800 MHz radio system is voluntary. Cities or counties may join at any ume. Capital funding includes $10 million in revenue bonds for Public Safety Mutual Aid, $3 million in transit bonds and an agreement that $15 million state bonds will be a high priority for the 1996 state bonding bill. Th» nublic safety and operational costs will be paid primarily from up to four cents of the 911 telephone tax. $194,000 was appropriated firom state highway funds to secure the necessary radio channels from the FCC and to cover other preliminary costs. 1995 Policy Narrative 15 The radio board consists of 17 members: one elected rcprcicntativc from each of the seven counties, Minneapolis, Sl Paul and Bloomington; five governor appointees (based on recommendations by various organizations including two suburban elected officials by AMM, one elected city official by LMC, one metro sheriiT anl one metro police chief); one Met Council member; and Mn/Dot ’s director of Eleciror ic Communications. The board sunsets July 1.1999. The Legislature will determine if the activity is to be transferred to the Met Council or a state agency. Tic primary ptupose of the shared radio system is to coordinate usage of a dwindling supply of radio channels in the metro region, at a time when demand is growing rapidly. The act is effective Aug. 1,1995. Ail of AMM’s primary concerns were met: • Qdes will not be forced to modify current systems, purchase new equipment prematurely or become part of the metro sysxm untU they voluntarily choose. • The system will provide a phased transition so that uninterrupted service is guaranteed • The system will be flexible to allow various local coordinated dispatch and service arrangements. • Governance will be representative of entida and users who will uldmately bear the cost but not dominated by any single user group. (VIII) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING FINANCE (Laws 1995, Chapter 224) The Legislature enacted several pieces of legisladon relating to economic development The legisladon includes the appropriadons bill as well as secdons of the bond allocadon, state departments, omnibus tax and the public finance bills. The following is a summary of the major components of the various inidatives: Development of Trade/Economic Development (DTED): Budget The agency’s budget for the 1995-1997 biennium totals $58.1 million. Of the total, the following appropriadons were identified: # # Six million for economic recovery grants. This is a one-year appropriadon. The program’s future will be, in part, determine by a legisladve auditor's report that is due during the 1996 session. The appropriation is below the governor’s recommendations of $14.0 million in new funds and the agency base level funding. About $379,000 each year for the small dues federal match. Approximately $1.9 million each year for the jobs skills partnership program. About $7.8 million for the biennium for the pollution clean-up program authorized under secdons 116J.551 to 116J.558. 1995 Policy Narrative • Customized job training grants of $300,000 to the Sl Paul Port Authority and $200,000 to the Minneapolis Community Dcvclcpmcnt Agency. • Two million for the continuation of the Community Resources Program (CRP) in Minneapolis. St Paul and Duluth. Department of Economic Security: Budget The department ’s total budget if $99.6 million. Of the total, the following appropriations are identified: • Approximately $935,000 each year of the biennium for transitional housing operations. • Three million for 1995, for summer youth emplo>Tnent programs. Minnesota Housing Rnance Agency (MHFA): Budget The agency’s budget is $47.5 million for the biennium. The budget is $13.5 million above the current biennial budget The agency’s budget for each year is $30.1 miUion for F.Y. 1996 and $17.4 million for F.Y. 1997. The major components of the budget are: (1) An Additional $6 Million for the Affordable Rental Investment Fund. The current biennial appr jpriation approximates $7 million. The appropriation includes language that directs the agency to work with public and private agencies in the McKnight Foundation regional to establish priority uses for the funds. In addition to the regional priorities, the agency must give preference to economically viable projects in which local governments, en^loyers and the private sector contribute financial assistance. (2) Develop Priorities for Fund Usage. In the metro area, the agency shall collaborate with the Met Council to develop priorities for us of the funds. The Legislamre also directed that the MHFA shall give preference to economically viable projects that: Include local financial contributions; Consider the availability of public transportation; Take into account job training efforts in the community; About $5.8 million for the Community RehabUitation Program (CRP). Of the CRP appropriation, $250,000 must be used each year for full-cycle home ownership and purchase-rehabilitation lending initiatives. Twenty percent of the CRP must be made available for use in low income neighboriioods of Minneapolis and St. Paul for the home ownership programs. Approximately $30 million in revenue bond proceeds are available and originate from a pre-1981 bond. For example, the proceeds can be made available for non-first time buyers and income and purchase price limits are not subject to current federal guidelines. The Legislature required the agency to give priority for use of the proceeds to cities that receive a CRP grant 1995 Policy Narrative About $1.5 million each year for rent assistance and/or famUy stabilization. milThe governor has vetoed $500,000 for lead abatement and $200,000 of a $400.1 appropriation for emergency mortgage foreclostiie prevention and emergency rental assistance. (IX) ISSUES NOT PASSED IN 1995 There were several bills of interest or concern that the AMM reported on d^g this session which did not pass. TechnicaUy. these bills are still "aUve” and can be consakred when the Legislature reconvenes in January. Housing as a Regional System (HF. 1258-Hausman-.SJ. 1233-Pappas) ^ This bill as introduced would have made housing a fifth regional system and required the Met CouncU to establish affordable housing goals for each city. Codification of Regional Blueprint (HF. 1114-Entenza;S.F. 1109 -hlovak) . . „ u, u i This bill also would have required the Met Council to estabhsh affordable housing goals and codified into statute portions of the Regional Blueprint Land Stewardship Land Use Planning Bill (HF. 779 - Orfield; SF. 698 - Morse) This bill virtually froze the MUSA line and established addidonal requirements for comprehensive plans. It also would have allowed residents throughout the state to bring civU action against the Met CouncU if local actions were not in compUance with Met CouncU plans and policies. Direct Election of Met Council Members (HF.609-Orfield:SF. 1107-Mondale) This biU would have estabUshed direct elections of a 16-member Met Councu and provided public financing for candidates. Property Tax Freeze , -m. c ♦ The Senate-proposed property tax and levy freeze did not become law. The Senate passed the freeze bUl (S.F. 1570) and then re-passed it three different times attached to other House files (H.F. 602,603 and 1864). During the final week of the session, the House leadership agreed to report out a conference report on H.F. 603. However, neither the Senate nor the House leadership could muster more than 15-20 House members to support the bill. The bUl never came to a vote on the House floor. 1995 Policy Narrative Up to the last week of the session, the governor ’s staff had insisted he would veto a freeze, but rumor during the last days indicated that if presented with a freeze bill, he would sign it Municipal Bond Interest Taxation The House Tax Committee chair Ann Rest pushed to have all state and local bond mterest taxable for income purposes. But due to extreme municipal pressure, the issue wai. dropped. Beg for Your LGA/HACA A House provision by Rep. Dawld.TS would have required metro area cities to prove they tverc being efficient and attempting to provide services cooperatively with other units to receive all of their U jA/HACA. This was turned into a statewide study by the Legislative Commission on Planning and Fiscal Policy. School Propv. iy Tax Constitutional Amendment The House-passed bill to remove schools from the local property tax was not taken up by the Senate. It does not indicate where funds might come from to replace local property tax. About $2 billion of replacement funds w ould be needed and could come from income, sales or a state-imposed property tax. Although the bill did not pass this year, it may and probably will be reconsidered next year. Municipal Tort Liability increase An Increase to the current $200,000/$600,000 municipal liability limits was well in its way to passage until it became embroiled in a political battle over joint and several liability language. This issue will be back next year since the cunent limits have not been adjusted in 10 years. Gas Tax & Transit Funding This was the year (supposedly) for a political agreement to increase the gas tax for highway funding and to provide alternatives and increased funds for metro transit initiatives. It did not happen. The House would not budge until it got a signal from the governor for gas tax support The signal did not come until the last week of the session and then it was weak at best. The Senate would not do anything for transit until a gas tax increase was agreed upon. A 1995 Policy Narrative M association of metropoiitan municipalities POLICY SUCCESS REPORT 1995 Legislative Session CONTENTS MUNICIPAL REVENUES (IV) METRO GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ________ A. Levy/Value Limits (I) B. Mandated State A Federal Programs (1) C. Local Government Aid (I) D. Property Tax (2) E. General Fiscal Impact Policies (2) F. Oppose Conversion of City LGAIHACA io School Aid (3) G. Homestead & Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) (3) H. State Imposed Fee for Service (3) /. Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution (3) A. Metro Governance Philosophy (7) B. Criteria for Extension of Authority (7) C. Structures, Planning A Funding (7) D. Comprehensive Planning (8) E. Met Council Budget (8) F. Metro Park Funding (8) G. Water Resource Management (8) //. Waste Stream Management (9) (V) TRANSPORTATION .......................................... 9 (II) GENERAL LEGISLATION..............................3 A. Oppose Reduction of Authority! Local Control (3) B. Tort Liability (4) C. General Public Data (4) D. Police <6 Fire Pension Provisions (4) E. Contractors Performance Bonds (4) F. 911 Telephone Tax (4) G. 8(X) Mllz Radio System (4 ) (III) HOUSING A ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ........... A. Housing A Neighborhoods (5) B. Economic Development (6) C. Land Use Planning (7) A. Street, Bridge A Highway Funding (9) B. Metro Transit Funding (10) C. Transportation Services Funding (10) D. Transportation Highway A Transit Funding (10) E. MSAS Funding (10) F. Hig Hway JurisdictL n (10) G. Transportation Utility (II) H. "5C" Transportation Planning (II) /. Railroad Right'of‘Way (I I) J City Speed Limits (I I) K. Transportation Incentives (II) L. Retd mal T•‘ansit System (II) M. MS. i Screening Committee (II) N. Metro Transit Tax (II) O. Airport Policy (II) P. Bikeway Grants Program (II) (I) MUNICIPAL RK\ KM K & TAXATION PoUcy #Description Priority Action Chapter/BilUl Comments lA-I Levy Limits C-A Upheld The Senate-passed "freeze” bill would have established a strict 3% or Implicit Price Deflator levy limit for 1997. IA2 Opposed Valuation/ Operation Freezes C-A ! Upheld The Senate-passed "freeze" bill would have frozen levies and property values for 1996. City lobbying prevented this bill from being heard in the House on the last day of session. IB /Mandated State &. Federal Programs B Partially Upheld Laws 1995 Chapter 248, S.F. 1246 Laws 1995, Chapter 264 H.F. 1864 A zoning, septic system or MUSA expansion permit, license or action must be acted upon within 60 days. A unit has up to 10 days to deter mine if application is complete; time may be extended by agreement The Legislative Commis sion on Planning and Fiscal Policy will study alternative aid distribution systems and ways to improve efficiency and effectiveness of local government service delivery. The commission can request that financial penalties be imposed if cities don't provide information for the study IC Local Government Aid A 1! Upheld The governor had recommended significant LG A cuts for both 1996 and 1997. No changes were made to I GA and the growth for 1996 based on the Implicit Price Deflator is 3.1%. Current law recalculates LG A increases each year for each city, with 1994 as the base grandfather year. AMM Policy Riporl (1995) Policy # Description Priority Action Chapter/Bill #CommentsIDlGeneral Class Rate Changes C-A Upheld Laws 1995 Chapter 264 H.F. 1864 There was no major class rate changes that will signif ^cantly impact other property classes. Seasonal recreational property class rate for va>ue under $72,000 will reduce from 2% to 1.9% for taxes payable in 1997 and 1.8% in 1998. The rate for value over $72,000 remains at 2.5%. Manu factured home pailc class rate will remain at 2% permanently. ID-2.3 Tax Exempt Property: Private/Pttblic B/D No Action A few bills were introduced but no serious discussion occurred. ID-4 Property Tax Reform C/A Upheld Major issues in policy were upheld as no major changes occurred in property taxation. Many bills intended to overtiaul the property tax system were introduced, heard and tabled. There will be major discussion in the interim and 1996. lE-I Fiscal Note Continuation C Upheld Fiscal notes continued per AMM policy. IE-2 Funding Shifts D Upheld Funding was continued per AMM policy. IE-3 State Revenue Stability C Upheld The stale budget reserve and its use were protected. IE-4 City Fund Balances OA Upheld AMM position of no restrictions or state connol upheld. AMM Policy Report (1995) Policy #Description Priority Action ChapterlBill #CommentsIFOpposeConversions of City LGA & HACA to School Aid A Upheld A last-day attempt was made by House leadership to permanently cut 1995 and beyond city/ctunty LG A/HACA by $25 million for school funding. The move failed due to overwhelming response by local officials to requests from AMM and others to quickly call their legislators. IG Homestead & Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) A j Partially Upheld Laws 1995 Chapter 264 H.F. 1864 The Omnibus Tax bill includes a one-time $16 million HACA cut in 1996 for cities, counties, towns and special districts. City share is slightly less than $8 million. Decrease is restored in 1997. IH State -imposed Fee for Services C Upheld No additional fees for services were imposed. II Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution C/A Upheld There were no bills processed that would have reduced the current fiscal disparity pool. S.F. 277/ H.F. 431 provided additional fiscal disparity contri> bution from part of new residential growth, which did not violate the policy. But, it was vetoed. «(ID GENERAL LECJISLATION IIA Oppose Reduc tion of Authority or Local Control C/A Upheld No new restrictions were imposed. AMM Policy Ri^port (1995) Policy # Description Priority Action ChapterIBitt #CommentsIIBTort Liability B Upheld Although there was a major effort to increase the local liability limits, the bill ultimately failed and no new changes to current law were enacted this year. lie General Public Data D No Action IID Police & Fire Pension Provisions C Upheld i No changes per AMM policy. HE Contractors Performance Bonds D No Action IIP 91 1 Telephone Tax D Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 195 S.F. 467 The general 911 telephone tax was unchanged, however, the 800 MHz bill provides that up to four cents of the tax may be used for the public safety portion of the 800 MHz backbone. no 800 MHz Radio System B Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 195 S.F. 467 A 17-member Metropolitan Radio Board was established to plan and implement a metro-wide public safety radio communications system with specific powers including construction granted to Mn/Dot. Board includes six city-elected officials and a police chief. All AMM policy criteria were met City participation is voluntary and the Met Council will oversee the radio board. AMM Policy Report (1995) (Ill) H()LSIN(; & NEICHBOKHOODSPolicy # Description Priority Action ChapterlBill #Comments IIIA-l, 2 Governmental Actions Affecting Housing Costs NA Not Action Policy These policies are not directed toward legislative action but are intended to serve as a reminder to all levels of government that they should carefully examine their policies and practices that, though unintended, may increase housing costs. Jl/A-3 Mandatory Land Use Standards cyA Upheld I1.F.779 S.F. 698 Not Passed This policy opposes mandatory zoning and land use standards being imposed at the state or metro politan level. IIIA-4 State Housing Policy A Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 224 and 255 Appropriates $7 million additional funds for affordable housing. Consolidated some programs. Repealed the 1:1 replacement in central cities. IIIA-5 Local Housing Policy B Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 255 Provides some funding and tools on a match basis for cities to provide affordable housing where needed and upgrade housing where there is too little higher value housing. (See Livable Communities Act - p.l in narrative) llIA-6 Metropolitan Housing Policy A Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 255 and Regional Blueprint Establishes three separate funds to deal with contaminated soils, construction of affordable housing and housing rehabilitation and mainte nance. The Regional Blueprint and this new law considers the linkage between housing, jobs and transportation called for in AMM policy. (See Livable Communities Act - pJ in narrative) AMM Policy Report (1995) ■I Policy # Description Priority Action Chapter/Bill #Comments AMM Policy Report (1995) IIIA-8,9 State/County Licensed Residen- tial Facilities D NoAction Policy Not Upheld Policy calls for more input from cities in the regulation of group homes. IIIB-1 Cities Redevelop ment & Economic Development B No Action Policy Not Upheld This policy suggests that a state development strategy be established and that cities be the primary governmental unit responsible for imple menting the strategy. IIIB-2 ReinstatelExpand URAP B No Action Policy Not Upheld The policy urges the Legislature to reinstate the former successful Urban Revitalization Action Program (URAP) and expand it to include suburban cities. lIlB-3 Equal Treatment of Cities C Upheld The AMM successfully opposed attempts in other proposed TIF legislation that would have set different requirements for usage of programs on basis other than problem derinition. IIIB-4, 5 Tax increment Financing B Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 264 (See TIF summary - p,6 in narrative) lIIB-6 Other Development Tools B Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 224 Did not establish new tools for cities and appro priated only $6 million for the economic recovery grant programs. IIIB-7 Development of Polluted Lands A Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 224 and 255 State appropriated $7.8 million for pollution clean-up and the Livable Communities Act pro vides about $4,(X)0,000 more for clean-up. Policy # Description Priority Action Chapter/Bill #Cf mmentslIIB-8 Building Permit Fee Surcharge D NoAction Policy Not Upheld Policy calls for the return or excess surcharge fee to local units of government. me Land Use Planning OA No Action Upheld No significant changes to state planning act, but Metro Land Planning Act was revised. (See Land Planning Act amendments -p.ll in narrative) (IV) METRO (JOVERNANCE STRl'CTl RE IVA Purpose of Metro Governance Structure NA This is a non>action policy which sets forth a philosophical framework for a metro governance structure. IVB Criteria for Exten sion of Metro Governance Authority aA Upheld No new authority granted to Met Council. IVC-l Selection of Met Council Members B Not Upheld H.F. 609 S.F. 1107 Policy calls for an elected Met Council of 16 members. IVC-2 Restructuring of Metro Agencies D Not Upheld Policy calls for the elimination of the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission as a metro agency and a clarification of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. AMM Policy Report (1995) Policy # Description/VC-3 Priority A ction Chapter!Bill #Policy Planning &. Implementation No Action CommentsNon-legislative action policy urging Met Council to maintain long-range planning as a high priority. lVC-4 /VC-5 IVD Funding for Regionally-pro vided Services No Action Policy opposes a single funding source for re gional government expenditures. Regional Tax Rates A User Fees Comp Planning: Local & Regional Interaction No Action Upheld HR 1258 S.R 1233 Policy opposes legislative regulation of fees charged for regionally-provided services. Would have made housing a regional system. AMM opposes this action. IVE Met Council Budget Process NA Non-legislative action policy. IVF-1 IVF-2 Operation A Main tenance of Re gional Parks B Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 220 $2.25 million appropriated for each year of bien nium for operation and maintenance. AMM policy calls for 40% funding from state. Regional Bonding for Regional Parks B Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 220 $5.1 million appropriated for the biennium. Met Council-issued regional bonds is contrary to AMM policy. IVG-I Water Supply Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 184 No new requirements for water supply planning except local water plans must be included in local comprehensive plans when they are updated per Laws 1995, Chapter 176. AMM Policy Report (1995)8 PoUcy # Description Priority Action Chapter/BiU #CommentsIVG-2 Surface & Ground Water Management C Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 184 Streamlines the review and approval process of surface water management plans. Should reduce the approval process tinw significantly. IVG‘3 Regional Waste Water Treatment System C Upheld No Action This Session Policy calls for uniform rates for the regional waste water treatment system. A study is under way that could lead to changes in the allocation of regional charges for the collection and treat ment of waste water. IVG-4 Water Testing Connection Fee C Not Upheld No Action This Session Policy calls for a change in the connection fee to make it more equitable. IVH Waste Stream Management B Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 247 Among its many provisions, completes the transfer of solid waste management duties of the Met Council to the state Office of Environmental Assistance. (VITRANSFORTAIION VA Street, Bridge A A Not Although several bills providing a gas tax increase Highway General Upheld were progressed, there was never a political Funding agreement between the Legislature and governor. Rural highway and urban transit supporters couldn't agree on funding compromise. Highway funding remains unchanged. AMM Policy Report (1995) Policy # Description Priority Action ChapterlBitt #CommentsVBMetro Transit System General Funding A Partially Upheld Laws 1995, Chapter 265 S.F. 371 $84 million was provided for metro transit and metro mobility. Tliis was $5 million less than the governor recommended and $9 million less than requested. The final amount was a compromise between the rural-dominated Senate position of $69 million and the House which tended toward full funding. A side deal allows the Met Council to spend at a $90 million level for their first year, thus requiring additional funding for year two or drastic cuts. VC Transportation Services Fund B No Action VD Transportation Highway & Trans portation Funding Alternatives A Not Upheld H.F. 1121 (Rep. Lieder) S.F. 832 (Sen. Flynn) Provided a five cent per-gallon indexed gas tax and a metro sales tax up to one-half cent to replace current transit property tax and state transit funds, not including metro mobility. This would have provided souk additional transit dollars. The proposal didn't get the necessary political backing. VE MS AS Funding for Combined Street Departments D No Action VF Highway Jurisdictional Reassignment D Upheld No changes made to current law. AMM Policy Report (1995) Policy #Description Priority Action Chapter/Bill #CommentsVGTransportation VHlity D No Action • VH *3C* Transportation Planning Process C Upheld AMM policy maintained. No changes to cuirent acitivies. VI Preservation of RR Right-of-Way C Uoheld A Mn/Dot Rules Process is per AMM policy. VJ City Speed Limits C Upheld No changes made to current law. VK Transportation IncentivesIDisin- centives D No Action VL Regional Transit System B Upheld Planning for current projects include elements within AMM policy. VM MSA Screening Committee D No Action VN Metro Transit Tax D Not Upheld (See VD (Transportation and Transportation Funding] • p. 10 of policy success) VO Airport Policy C Upheld The dual-track process will continue. VP Bike-way Grants Program D No Action . i AMM Policy Report (1995) MINNEIlAIiA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF BOARD OF MANAGERS AGENDA Thursday, June 22, 1995 - 7:30 PM Minnetonka Community Room Minnetonka Community Center, Minnetonka, MN zo r 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Reading and Approval of March 9, March 23 and June 8, 1995 Board Meeting Minutes 4. Citizejus not on agencLi who wish to address Board (2 minute allowance) 5. Long Lake Improvement Project - Status Report 6. Chain of Likes Improvement Project >Twin Lakes Subwatershed Improvement Project FYI City of St. Louis Park Letter 7. Permit Applications A. The following applications have been reviewed by the Engineers and approval is recommended. 95-67 95-108 95-109 95-122 95-123 95-128 95-130 95-132 95-136 95-137 95-138 95-139 95-140 95-142 City of Minnetonka Hartman Construction, Inc. Malamed/Laver Partners Boyd City of Wayzata City of St. Louis Park Abingdon Development Tripp Carlson Real Estate Strickland Nordblom Carlson, Carlson & Ohland Weber Andrade Corporation B. The following application has been reviewed by the Engineers and denial is recommended. 95-129 Johnson C. The following applications have been reviewed by the Engineers and are incomplete until such a time as all required exhibits have been received. 95-75 95-141 Woodbridge Church Johnson 8. Engineer ’s Report - □ Break □ Executive Session - > Pearce Property > Landview Landscaping > Halley Homes I (Mpls) 9. Attorney’s Report - 10. Treasurer’s Report - A. Approval of Check Register for the period of May 1 - May 31,1995 B. Approval of May Financial Statements 11. Committee Reports - A. Old Business B. New Business > Complaint’ & Violations 12. Administrative Report - A. Proposed Revisions to Sandblanket Permit Application B. Licensed Contractors Inspection Report C. Draft Survey for Licensed Contractors • . , • D. Resolution Authorizing Norwest Bank as the Depository for Checking and Savings Accounts with Signature Cards for persons authorized to sign 13. Manager’ Reports - 14. Old Business- A. Rules Provision regarding permits being heard twice a month B. Review and recommendation of Board Workshops a. proposal to adopt the outline describing Lead Manager responsibilities 15. New Business - > Maintenance Proposal to Develop a Feasibility for designing new gill gates at the Gray’s Control Stioicture 16. Adjournment - MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD OF JUNE 8,1995 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnet was called to order by President Maple at 6:10 p m . Thursday. June 8. 1995, Minnetonka City Hall Community Room. Minnetonka. Minnesota. Managers Present: President Tom Maple. Vice President Woody Love, Treasurer Tom LaBounty, Secretary Jolin Thomas, Pamela Blixt. Monica Gropss and Martha Hartfiel. Managers absent: none Also present: Counsels Louis Smith, Prasanta Reddy; F.^iinccrs Mike Panzer, Andrew SyTcrson; Staff. Distnet Director Gene Strommen, Assistant Distpct Director Suzanne W'eedman. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Manager Love moved to waive the reading of the 6/25/95 minutes, seconded by Manager Thomas. Strommen noted a correction in the minutes, page 1, PERMIT APPLICATIONS paragraph, line 10. delete “Minneapolis grant wrinen approval of’, and insert in its place “St Louis Park appiove ’. Maiuiger Gross noted a spelling correction for Dale Claridge s name among those also present. VOTE. Motion to approve as corrected earned. CITIZEN COMMENTS. Vance Harris, 1305 Bl.ick Oaks La, Plymouth, an affected property owner adjacent to the Gleason Creek II subwatershed improvement project, expressed his appreciation for the work done to upgrade Gleason Creek. He noted that the area is considerably improved over the condition which existed prior to the project start. Landscape improvements were also cited as well done and a great benefit to the area. The board acknowledged this comment with an appreciation for the patience and confidence the neighbors exhibited during the project. Susu Jeffries, Braemar Av., Minneapolis, took e.xception to the characterization made of her comments by Dennis Trooien. attorney for Halley Homes Builders, as reported in the May 25, 1995 board meeting. Jeffries presented an overhead illustration sho\ving comparisons of wetland areas to re make her point about what she believes is happening to the floodplain in the Haley Homes development. LONG LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Engineer Panzer distributed the Long Lake Improvement Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW') to the board members. The EAW IS scheduled to ic published in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor June 19, followed by a 30 day comment period endmg July 18. Panzer then pointed out that a meeting wth Jack Wohlfers and his legal counsel on the designated site June 7 resulted in the landowner finding the project too large and occupy ing too much of their land. John B. Lennes. Jr. attorney for the WahIfors family, presented his client’s position. He questioned why other propem- is not being considered. He cited an example of the publicly owned property to the south. His client believes the 130,000 cu.yds of material to be removed will take a long time to move, disrupting the WahIfors and their neighbors. His client may be more supportive of a project “a little smaller”, Lennes continued. He added that the WahIfors would like to preserve some horse trails near the north end. He also said that the land has been in the WahIfors family for over 100 years Lennes also questioned if a “home” for the soil will be found before it is removed. MCWD BoaiU McclmtJ 6/S/95 Counsel Smith noted that the suggestions now being made on behalf of Wahlfors are new. Panzer responded that the contractor is obligated to have a suitable site for material removed if the land owner does not want any of it. Lennes says his client docs not believe the sale of soil is as important as noted in the property appraisal. Smith pointed out the value of time on this project Construction should begin about 12/1 to 12/15. The bo.ird needs 120 days aliead of a 12/15 start to meet permit requirements Panzer noted the Corps of Engineers permit will take about four months to process. WTiile the project size is six acres, mitigation requires 12 acres Smith continued that a pond location cannot be accomplished further upstream, and an exhaustive inquiry with the MN DNR over a year's time determined that the scientific-dcsignated land to the south is not available. Manager LaBounty reminded the board of the condemnation proceedings which could take place while negotiations arc occuning for a possible solution. Condemnation was noted to take 90 days. The condemnation proceedings could stop whenever agreement is reached. Manager Love moved Manager LaBount}’ seconded that the board direct the attorney to approve initiation of condemnation proceedings . and that the attorney and engineer w ork w ith the Wahlfors and their attorney to seek a resolution short of a condemnation, and report back at the next meeting., VOTE. Roll call: Ayes - Bli.xt, Gross, Hartfiel, LaBounty, Love, Maple, Thomas; Nays - none; Motion carried unammously Lennes thanked the board for their time and indicated he would stay in touch GLEASON CREEK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2. Manager LaBounty called the managers' attention to a prcliminaiy Summary ’ of Project E.xpcnses. 1/1/94 through 5/31/95, for Gleason Creek Phase 2 which total $143,031.80. He noted that there are a few bills which have not been received. Tlie project was projected at a $200,000 budget. With projected bills the final figure should come in under $ 160,000. h is significant to note that the MCWD has closed out on the project. DNR representatives, managers and staff have viewed the work done on Phase I and Phase II. There were many positive comments. LaBounty invited questions. Manager BILxt asked if this closing out means the City of Wayzata financial issue is resolved. LaBounty responded that the project completion he is referring to is for Gleason Creek Phase 2, the financial question with the City of Wayzata on Gleason Lake Phase 1 is still pending. Manager Thomas offered his heartfelt thanks and congratulations on behalf of the Board for a job well done, the managers concurring unanimously. LaBounty offered his appreciation for the recognition. CHAIN OF LAKES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Panzer noted that the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) will be sent out June 9 to the list of agencies, cities, regulators and interested citizens. Permit requirements for the Twin Lakes park site are unsettled due to the road demolition material buned in the site. In talking with staff from the Hennepin County Solid Waste MINNEHAHA CREEX ^ WATERSHED DISTRICT 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 611 Twelve Oaks Center Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 office: (612) 47S-7970 fax: (612) 476-7973 BOARD OF MANAGERS: T>o<rasVa:e -r =-?s *C '.VocC'C» i.:ve».crn CarxsontrceyT^cn-as .v L^ri'-rrv Varj-a S .-ar e* • =jt5 a G = rt E Trcrras TO: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM Interested Parties Mike Panzer, Wenck Associates Long Lake Improvement Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) nir cmrc» IUJt CWONO j ImdEBU^ i '3 1995 » • » » DATE:June 12, 1995 On behalf of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), we are f EAW for the Long Lake Improvement Project to the interested parties include . official Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution ‘i''* EAW will be published in the FOB Monitor on June 19, 1995 which begms the official 30 day public comment period. Supporting documents (e.g., design plans, design report) are available from the District Office by calling 476-7970. Design plans, the EAW, and the supponing design report were approv^ by the MCWD following a public hearing on May 25, 1995. Construction documents (plans, s^ciftcatiom, and Adding Lcuments) will L prepared once all the necessary permits “<* from the appropriate regulatory agencies. Construction of the watershed improvements scheduled to begin in December of 1995. The overall purpose of the project is to improve the water quality in Long Lake by reducing sediment and phosphorus loadings. The project involves constructing three wet detention basin/ wetlands and alum treatment of Long Lake. A technical advisory committee has provided technical input during the planning and design stages of the project. The committee was comprised of representatives from Ae cities of I^ng Se Mela and Orono and BWSR, DNR, HCD. MPCA and interested citizens. THe various regulatory agencies have also been kept informed of the design of the project and their input was obtained during the preliminary design process. Regulatory agency comments have been incorporated into the final design to the greatest possible extent while retaining the overall project objectives. N:«tl51O4.a07\MIFMCIU.MEM-Ot£-1)* long lake improvement project EAW DISTRIBUTION LIST (6-9-95) LWIRO.NMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (1 copy) Gresf Downiiig Enviroamenul Review ProgTim 300 Centennial Office Building 65S Cedar Street St. Paul, NIN 55155___________________ DEP.VRTNJENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (1 copy) Jim Alan 200 Metro Square Building 121 7ih Place East Si. Paul, MN 55101 __________________ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (3 copies) Tom Balcom Office of Planning 500 Lafayette Road. Box 10 St. Paul, MN 55155 POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (3 copies) Paul Hoff Environinenial Analysii Office 520 Lafayette Road Si. Paul. MN 55155 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (3 copies) Gerald Lanon Mn/DOT Environmental Services 34S5 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, MN 55128 department of HEALTH (1 copy) Rita Messing Dinnaker Building P.O. Box 59040 925 Delaware Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040 department of AGRICULTTRE (I copy) Paul Bums 90 West Plato Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55107 OFnCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ,\SSISTANCE (I copy) Kevin Johnson 1350 Energy Line St. Paul. MN 55108 HENTSTPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT (1 copy) Ellen Sones 10801 Wsyzau Boulevard. Suite 240 Minnetonka, MN 55305 CITY OF LONG LAKE (3 copies) Joe Lynch City Clerk P.O. Box 606 Long Lake, 55356-0606 HENNEPIN COLTSTTY (1 copy) Joel Settles Environmental Management Division 417 North Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55401-1039 BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES (1 copy) Doug Thomas 155 South Wibsshs, Suite 104 St. Paul. MN 55107 HISTORICAL SOCIETY (1 copy) State Historic Preservation Office 345 Kellogg Boulevard West St. Paul. MN 55102 legislative REFERENCE LIBRARY (2 copies) Zona DeWiti 645 Sute Office Building Si. Paul. MN 55155 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LIBRARY a copies) 300 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 X U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGLNEERS (I copy) Ben Wopat, Chief Regulatory Functions BrtfKh Army Corps of Engineers Certtra 190 Fifth Street East Si. Paul, MN 55101-1638 ________——— U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (1 copy) William D. Franz Chief of Environmenul Review 77 Weat Jackaon Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604-3590 VS. nSH AND WODUFE SERVICE (1 copy) Twin Citiea Field Office E.S. 4101 EaA 80lh Street Bloomington, MN 55425-1665 METROPOLITAN COUNCDL (1 copy) Lynda Voge, Referrals Mean Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 CITY OF ORONO (1 copy) Dorothy Hallin City Clerk P.O. Box 66 CrysulBay, MN 55323-0066 CITY OF MEDINA (3 copies) Jeff Karlaon City Clerk 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 MDiNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (I copy) Tom Maple, President 15500 Wsyzau Boulevard, SuiU 611 Twelve Oaks Center Wayzau, MN 55391 45O4.a09VDOT.LSTAES-Iiv Environmental Assessment Worksheet ► Long Lake Improvement Project WTVC^ cncNOOJ,_____ JUN i'3 1995 Prepared for Minnehaha Creek Watershed District May 1995 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) ^ space M.cned, actach addMona, shea, as necessan ’. »* rHta vfinnesota E^vironinental QuaJitv Board (EQB) at (612) -96* faTlc o;«a.o'fcr sbe EQB enviroameaol review program) or coasult -iAW Guidelines," a booklet avaUable from the EQB. Note to Revie>%-ers . rg U (see items 3) during the 30^ay comment period followmg notice Comments must be submitted to ‘ If-jj the EOB to learn when the comment period ends.) of the EAW in the EQB Nionitfl L . comoleteness of the information, potential impacts that may Comments should address the ac^racy P EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an warrant furdier . accuracv and completeness of the information and suggest EIS (see item 4). comments should addr-ss the accuracy issues for investigation in the EIS. 1. Project Title 2. Proposer Contact Person Address Phone 3. RGU Contact Person and Title Address Long Lake Improvement Project Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Mike Panzer, District Engineer Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 428 Maple Plain, MN 55359 (612) 479^200 Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distria Mike Panzer District Engineer Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 428 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone (612) 479-4200 4. Reason for EAW Preparation [ ] EIS scoping [X] mandatory EAW [ ] citizen petition I^AW^o^EIS^is mandatory give EQB rule category number(s) [ ] RGU discretion Minn. Rules, pt. 4410.4300, subp. 27 N: V) I 3»VLancZ-»i»*£AW-AE$-Q V Page 1 of 24 5/24/95 5. Project Location n.e Lon* Lake Improveoeeet Prcjec: involves four separate projea components. a. rnnnrv Road Nc < n^>,.rnon Bisin/Wetl.aji^l Township HSN., Range SW SW Va County Hennerin Section -6_ Citv/Twp Prong 23W b. ritaar Hill Road Detention Rn^in/Wetlyid; NW Va WV «4 Section 26.Township 118N^ Range County Henneoin Clty/Twp Medina. c. Pirv nf T nng T Wet Detenrion NW <A Section _H- Township _USiL. Rang. _2iW County Hennepin _ d. y npg Lake Treatneni N Section _li_ Township _jm. County Hennenin CityHTwp .,T onP T ,aKg Ocm Range 23W 6. a. Description Give a compUtef construction activities, Tlse Long Lake toprovement projea ~ phosphonis loading and improve water quality of Long Lake. Pn.d N9 ^ w^t Detention Basin/w?ylandi A two cell wet detention basin/weUand 730 aa^^A ^T^acfe P f " tte.f»TStrLlr».“ S;."S?=n“*SSi^rrin1r3r, 19« ant. he contp.et. by mid-summer of 1998. M:y)lt5>0^3W^t^iy ilp.F.AW«A&lf>Page 2 of 24 5/24/95 b.Hill Ro -»1 PetentTon Ri«iinAVetlan.,4: c. d. r>v nf T nn? T -»i^^ Wet Det-»nr’on Pn<jin5/Wet|^ Two existing stonnwater^im^^a^a approximately 0.S5 acres and enlarged and deepened. The enJ , Construction activities include basin excavation will connected together by a new storm sew^p p_ ^ drainage ditch entering the sue and installation of 206 feet ot storm se P ,^gd through the second basin prior to “j.... .w J.ong I nice Alum TrearmenlL T nn<T Tjilce to control the internal loading of phosphorous Aluminum sulfate (alum) wUI be If by barge in one event taking less than two ss!S“S irji"—r V- V u.. L... which have depths greater than four feet. Provide a 50 or/aver word abstraafor use in £■(?» Monitor notice. The Long Lake Improvement Projea involves four “P?™'rompon^^dude; alum treatment of Long Lake. 7. Project Magnitude Data rn„nfv Road Nn Wet Defenrion p?sih/Wetlandl Totd Projea Area (acres) LajSISS or Ungth (miles) NurrJser of Residential Unas '^^el^LndasrriaUInstimrional Building Area (grossfloor space) Toted NA square feet; Indicate area of specific uses: NA a. NA ihiXAW-A£SM>Page 3 of 24 5/24/95 omce NA Retail NA V/arehouse Manufacrurin?Ji\ Other Industrial, Institutional, Light Industrial, Other Commercial (specify). Building Height(s) NA b. Peer Hill Pond Wet D^rgntion B^^inAVetlandl To,cl Projea Area (acre!) <”■ Number of Residenzial Units Unattached >ja Attached d^^rcial/Industrial/Institutional Building Area (gross floor space) Total NA square feet: Indicate area of specific uses: NA Office_fiA __________________ Pearml MA----------------------- NA NA Warehouse.NA ManufacturingJih --------- Other TnHuvrrial NA Institutional._______NA. Light Industrial.NA Agricultural.NA Other Commercial (specify)___NA Building Height(s). NA--------- c.Pin, nf I nnf I Jlrn Wm D«fHjlll RJ^in«/W«land: Total Project Area (acres) LiOjsISS or Leogih (miles) Number of Residential Units Ummached NA_ attached Commercial/Industriainnstitutional Budding Area (gross floor space) Total NA square feet: Indicate area of specific uses: NA NA NA Office NA Retail NA Manufacturing^^h. Other Industrial Wnrehnuse NA Tnmtutional NA NA A orirultura l NALight Industrial. Other Commercial (specify)---NA Budding Height (s)------NA d. y nny T.ake Alum Treatment: Total Projea Area (acres) 2-0 acr^ or Length (mUes) Number of Residential Units Vnattached _iiA_ ^ Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Building Area (gross floor space) Total NA _ square feet; Indicate area of specific uses: NA NA NA H:«ll5^309VLaBiUl»XAW.A£S-4/^Page 4 of 24 5/24/95 Qfficg NA Retail NA_ Warehouse.VA ManufaauringJiA Other Industrial —, Instirational. NA NA Light Industrial^____ Other Commercial (specijy)— Building Height(s). NA Agricuirural —NA 8. a. Permits and Approrals Required Us: oH local, stare. furJing required: r..nnrv Road ^ Wet DetP^rion Basin,-^'etlan^ arJ federal permits, approvals, and Unit of Government Type of Application MN Dept, of Natural Resources (DNR) Proteaed Waters Permit a™ cents of Engineers Wmdu^ (COE) ^ P^lution Coopo. Agency Set^on «1W«« City of Orono Hennepin County Conditional Use Permit and Flowage easement modification Road Access Permit Status Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Jj Hill RoaH Wet Detention B^to/Wgtlyi dl Unit of Government MN Dept, of Natural Resources (DNR) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Type of Application Protected Waters Permit Individual Section 404 Permit Section 401 Water Quality Certification Status Conc^t Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted m early June 1995 Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 N:>01 Page 5 of 24 5/24/95 CIcv of Medina Land Alteration Permit Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 C. r:rv of Long T ake Wet Derention p.i^insAVetland: Unit o f GoYemment Type of AppUcation MN Dept, of Natural Resources Protected Waters Permit (DNR) Status Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide (COE)Permit No. 26 Concept Review in Progress Permit Application to be submitted in earlv June 1995 City of Long Lake Grading and Excavation permit Permit Application to be submitted in early June 1995 d. T nng Lake Alum Treatment! Unit of Government Type of Application Status MN Dept, of Natural Resources (DNR) Approval by DNR ecological services Request for approval to be submitted in early June 1995 City of Long Lake City of Orono Project Approval Project Approval 9. ^potential conflias involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. a.Cniinry Road No. 6 Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: Th** s^r^’s current land use is a natural undeveloped jurisdictional wetland and undeveloped uplm^ the open water. The wet detention basin/wetland created would be adjacent to an existing 11 act DNR wetland. No environmental hazards due to past land uses are expected as the site has not Deen significantly altered in the past. SoU samples were collected from borings drilled « seven location on the site. No herbicides, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) or semivolatiles were det^ two composite samples analyzed. Metal compounds were all detected within normal background concentration ranges. N I t5>04.2DWjaBfJUi»XAW-Page 6 of 24 5/24/95 b.r;^:?r Hill Ror’d T^^?g"iio P R?-<irAVetlan^ . J -e „nHAv^»inned iurisdictional wetland and undeveloped grassland. The The sites current land use is und P J .. vears. The proposed project would cover exhttog wetland baa beet, d.tcbed resid«rfal dwelltog' Adjacent i:.0S aaea. The -to acre pnva.e and paature land. There are a large parcels consist 01 !“*' '“ "jL a horse farm immediately east of the proposed project. The number ot horses m the 5 “ ^ is located south of me ptoposeo ptojea. The proposed Wolsteld Woods Scientmc and . ^ fUg existin® 10.30 acre (Type 2) wetland by creating project would change tne na^e ot environmental hazards due to past deep waterhabiaofhnge in the past. Soil samples were land uses are expected locations on the site. *No herbicides, pesticides, polychlormaied ‘h°Ss ffCBslTr «mvofatiles were detected in two composite samples analyzed. Metal X'o^ids^were ^1 within normal background concentration ranges. c. r;f^. nf T on? T Wet Detention Ra<jin^/We;jMlds: The site's ^^uSa\^^paS“d^1in *e“aJk ^ A® ^STe Sr^pt^^was — om f^rns are expected. Soil samples were colle eamnle.*; analyzed Low levels of semivolatiles or Ki“ r.‘“- compounds Ire ail deteaed within normal background concentranon ranges. d. I npg T.ake Treatment: Long Lake wUl be treated with alum and wUI not change land use in any way. 10. Cover Types Esti^e r/» ucreuge o/,/m sire wiri. «ch o/rte/Wi»win| co«r OPes and aftar development (before and after totals should be eq )• a.r^.vnrv Road No. 6 WPt Detention Rasin/WedaniL After Before After Before Types 2 to 8 Wetlands 2.50 acres 1.92 acres Urban/Suburban Lawn Landscaping 0 acres 0 acres Wooded /Forest 1.03 acres 0.29 acres Impervious Sui£Ke Access Road (Class V) 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0.07 acres Bnish/Grassland Cropland 0 acres Deep water habitat 0 acres 1.25 acres 0 acres 0 acres 3.53 acres 3.53 acres nsassr Hill Road ris.fpntinn Ra.<;in/Wetlandl Before After Before After Types 2 to 8 Wetlands 7.67 acres 5.65 acres Urban/Subuxban Lawn Landscaping 0 acres 0 acres I t3'04-3WNLflBcLii»£A^*^^*l^Page 7 of 24 5/24/95 c. Wooded /Forest 0 acres 0 acres Impervious Surface 0 acres 0 acres Brush/Grassland 4.41 acres 2.48 acres Access Road (Class V)0 acres 0.20 acres Cropland 0 acres 0 acres Deep Water Habitat 0 acres 3.75 acres 12.0^ acres 12.08 acres City of Long I nke Wet Detention BasinsAVetland: Before After Before .After Types 2 to 8 Wedands 0 acres 0 acres Urban/Suburban Lawn Landscaping 0.74 acres 0.55 acres Wooded /Forest 0 acres 0 acres Impervious Surface 0 acres 0 acres B rusiL'G rassland 0.27 acres 0 acres Wet detention basins 0.39 acres 0.85 acres Cropland 0 acres 0 acres 1.40 acres 1.40 acres d. Long Lake Alum Treatment: Treatment of Loos Lake with alum will in no way change the current cover type which is approximately 271 acres of lake surface. Alum wUl be applied to 220 acres of Long Lake which have depths greater than four feet. 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affeaed by the proiea. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impaas. 1. rniintv RnaH No 6 Wet Detention BasinAVetland: There are no fish resources on-site. Water quality improvements in Long Lake as the project may enhance the ability of game fish to live in Long Lake. In addiuon, a fish barrier will placed between the project and the lake to prevent rough fish from utilizing the basms for spawmng. TTie site currently provides habitat for a variety of small animals and birds. observed in this area. There may be additional wUdlife resources located within Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area (WWSNA). The WWSNA is north of County Road No. 6 and &e proposed project in no way impacts the WWSNA. The projert is scheduled to be constructed durmg the winter months minimizing impacts to wildlife. 2. Deer Hill Pond Wet Detention BasinAVetlandl There are no fish resources on-site. Water quality improvement in Long Lake as the result of project may enhance the abUity of game fish to live in Long Lake. The site currently provides habitat for a variety of small animals and birds. Deer have also been observed m the area. There may oe additional wUdlife resources located within WWSNA located immediately south of the proposed project. Best management practices will be used during construction to avoid and/or minimize^y erosion and sediment transport concerns related to basin construction upstre^ of WWSNA. The project is scheduled to be constructed during the winter months minimizing impacts to wildlife. N; V115V>4-aWVLaB*tAl»-EAW-AES^fr Page 8 of 24 5/24/95 J. ■ ,.f T nn<T Like Ba^insjWgtjss^ War^r nnalitv imDrovements in Long Lake as the result of the There are no fish resources on-site. Lo^g Lake. In addition, a fish barrier wUl be proje-r. may enhance the event rough fish from utilizing the basins for spawning, placed between the project an ■mere ere rro known wUdlife resources on ot near the site. Long T aike AU^ni Trg3trn0nL , ■ - e C „,r,uic=s was obtained from a July 1991 survey by the DNR; The following list ot fish resourc,.s was uu b. 1. 2. Northern Pike Cenaal Mud Minnow * Common Shiner Spottail Shiner Fathead Minnow Pumkinseed BluegUl Largemouth Bass Black Crappie Yellow Perch Johnny Darter Carp Golden Shiner White Sucker Black Bullhead Yellow Bullhead White Crappie Bowfin ("Dog Fish") Hybrid Sunfish ^uminum in fish. Dissolved alummum ^ envirooinentaliy safe dose based on tlw and approved by the DNR. Are there any state-listed endangered. ecological colonial waterbird nesting colonies; ^ resource and how it would be affected by tj^ minimize or avoid adverse impaas. — Pned Vo. (i tvet PetfP'ittn HOTii/wetlaiidi ^ 3'« The Miimesota Nt^al in no way impacts the WWSNA and its vegetation. p ... mtl Bnart W- r------- Hasin/Wedandl S The Minnesota Natural ^^''pOTStsTa^d'o^^^orS^^ endangered is s™* of D«r HUl Road Wet Detention BasinWetland N:'Oltr04.2D9VLoocUi»X^W.Ar5-Qv Page 9 of 24 5/24/95 R33. Cir/ of Long Like Wt»r Detgnrnn Basin$AV^t!ard: liiiVo 4. Long Lake Alum Treatment: E3 No V Physical Imoacts on Water Resources mi tke projea invoNa the physical or hydrologic dterahon ^ (diedging filling, stream diversion, oufiail smxcmre. diking, impoundt^m) of any surface water (lake, pond wehand. stream, drainage ditch)? [J Yes [] No. If yes. identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the alteration, including the construcnon process: volumes of dredged or fill material: area affeaed: length of stream diversion: water surface areaaffeaed:^^^ fluctuations in water surface elevations: spoils disposal sites: and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. rnttnrj Roarf Vo fi w.*f Detenqop R.\«;in/Wetland: S yes The Drojec: involves ejcsvadon within an existing DNR protected stream and a juiMicnonal wedand. ^ approximately 600 foot section of the DNR ptoteaed stream will be extmvated Ibr the purpose ot cons^cting a rwo-ceil wet detention basin. The stream wUI be ^tered to the extent rtat it flows through a basin where the extended detemion time in the basin allows for nument and sedtment removal. The project does not restrirt flow or change any existing water levels. The basiiu will b^xcavated with backhoes or drag lines within a projea easement area of 3.53 acres. A tot^ ot 25,000 cu^c yards of soils wUl be excavated. Tlie spoU disposal site wUl be determmed by the contraaor. To minimize construaion related impacts, the projea wUl be construaed m January and February when there is no stream flow. a. b. c. peer Hill Road Wet Detenrion Basin/Wetlandl S ^es nie projea involves excavation within an existing DNR proteaed stream and a jumdictional wetland. An Mproximately 1100 foot section of the DNR proteaed stream will be excavated for the purpose of constructing a two-cell wet detention basin. The stream wUl be altered to the extent foat it flows through a basin where the extended detention time in the basin allows for nutrient and sedunent removal. The projea does not restria flow or change any existing water levels. The basins wUl be ^^vat^ with backhoes or drag lines wifoin a projea easement area of 12.08 acr«. A to^ yards of soils will be excavated and removed from the site. The spoil disposal site will b^etermmed by the contractor. To minimize construction related impacts, the projea will be construaed m December, January and February when there is no stream flow. 13 YesCifv nf T rno Lake Wet Detention Basins/Wetland: The projea involve.^ enlarging and deepening two existing sedimentation basins construa^ within 1) a drainage ditch for a 613 aae subwatershed and 2) the ouUet of a 20 acre subwatershed. The two basins discharge directly to Long Lake. Normal flows will be diverted through a 36-mch pipe trom basin one to basin two to further improve water quality treatment of the subwatershed tributary to basin one. Under high flow conditions, water will bypass basin two by flowing over an existmg ou e struemre out of basin one. The projea does not restria flows or change any existing water levels. 15^30^1 ■i»-EAW«AES»liw Page 10 of 24 5/24/95 wm t* «=av.ed with bachhc« rc™aacc;°^oSt r.la;»l impacts. *e proje« wUl be constructed in Januars- and February when there is no srream flow. 3 Nod. T nrig La.V:e Alum Treatment: 13. a. Water Use TV7// the projea in^vlve the unpermUred yvells, r,M,nfv T?oad v<^ ^ Wet Der^nrion Pj^yn/Wetlaodl ® No D3Hill Ro^H Wgt Detemi"" B?^inAVetlandi A S-inch 150 foot deep water we,, is ^ number was assigned to the well as it ^ licensed water well drUler in accordance with the Health Well Code. The well wdl be well will be drilled for dte private Minnesota Department ot Health ,ocadon will be seleaed by the landowner landowner to replace the abandoned well. The new wen and will be outsite of the project easement. r;tv of T nng Wf»r Detention Ba.^in^^/Wetla acil S No I ] al«» Ai^im Treatment: H No Wilt thtprojta D.c«„hefn,pncro/.he approprianon on ground wtzrer levels. Rg rn.tnrv Road Mo ^ W.»t Detention PaMn/We^lacdl ^ Yes No dewatering of groundwater is planned may ^ jLary and February. However, te^ra^ bSTw^Siction which is anticipated torjS.'rrsrn™ ■*“ levels. 1. 3. 4. b. 1. *** FAW^AES-Q^e Page 11 of 24 5/24/95 2. Deer Kill Ror»d We; pacinAVetland: Yes No dewaierin<' of groundwater is planned during construction as the excavation is anticipated to occur in December January and February. However, temporary dewatering of groundwater from the excavation mav be required. If dewatering is required it would occur during basin construction which is anticipated to last no longer than two months. Temporary dewatering would have minimal impact on groundwater levels. 3. Cirv' of Long Lake Wer Detention Basins /Wetland: S Yes No dewatering of groundwater is planned during construction as the excavation is anticipated to occur in January and February. However, temporary dewatering of groundwater from the excavauon may be required If dewatering is required it would occur during basin construction which is anticipated to last no longer than two months. Temporary dewatering would have minimal impact on groundwater levels. 4. T,nn? Lake Alum Treatment: cJ iVo c.Will the project require connection to a public waier supply? [ J Yes PCJ *Vb. If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used. 14 Water-related Land Management Districts Does arty part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning distria. a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated mid or scenic river land use distria? If yes. identify the distria and discuss tha compatibUity of the projea mth the land use restrictions of the distria. a. rntmtv RoaH Nn f, Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: A majority of the projert area is regulated under the Shoreland Management Aa. Statewide DNR shoreland standards apply to an area within 300 feet of the stream running through the site. The project is compatible with the land use restrictions as the restrictions apply » lot ^d stroci^e development and no development is proposed. In addition, the finished project will ma intain an appropriate impact zone which will be revegetated as necessary. b, Degf Hill Road Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: A majority of the project area is regulated under the Shoreland Management Act. Statewide shoreland standards apply to an area within 300 feet of the stream tunning through the site. The project is compatible with the land use restrictions as the restrictions apply » lot ^d strac^e development and no development is proposed. In addition, the finished project will maintam an appropriate impact zone which will be revegetated as necessary. rirv nf Long Lake Wet Detention Basins/Wetland: The project area is regulated under the Shoreland Management Act. Statewide DNR standards apply to an area within 1000 feet of Long Lake. In addition, the projea area is also largely within the 10- day 100 year floodplain (948.3) as modeled in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s Water Resource Management Plan (1993). The projea is compatible with the landuse restrictions as the c. N;VDIty<M"30^L«igt nh^FAW-AES-Ijir Page 12 of 24 5/24/95 d. 15. -inri no devcloprncnt is proposed. No structures 3xe storage. T nn? Lak** Alum Jr^ament: W...=.«e<l Land Use Manage^en. Disnics re^ladons do no apply .0 in-.alse alum uenunen,. water Surface Us. 7isZZ ‘pot^-^ 4 .H ,0 increase water quality of Long Lake but are not expected to result Ta sTStorSe St. number or ty^e of water craft used on Long Lake. 16. Soils dd^ -f boring fogr Describe the soils on the sue. giving 5CS classp need not be attached.) a r-.Tn.4, Pnad NO. 6 Wtfjarifml'ni Basin/WtiUiiili 1 ft Redrock- minimum 200 ft.- average J22JL- Groundwater: minimum JL. average B»irock. ^ b. flui Brad wn nnemion Pasin/Wfliaiiili 0 average 1 ft, Bedrock: minimum average _V-5fL. r~rr,i,nHwater 0 average _i—ka— fot tet,SiSrof.«tiS‘i» C nf T nnr Lakr "'‘t n«»«ion Basin.sfWjtiMil; ■ „,mn Q_ average a Bedrock: minimum OSUL. average Groundwater: mmmiumJL. average---- ,Uo indicates sous at tb. site - ~ ““ STrio^tSpStS S Se'^icinity of the two proposal basin expanstons. d. T nner T.ake i^ImTTI Treatment! Soils on lake bottom not mapped. Bedrock: minimum — av^age a>«.EAW.AES»rr»Page 13 of 24 5/24/95 17. Erosion and Sedimaitation Give :o i. ircdci or »ca.o:od ond c-obic yards of sod w bo mc-od: j cubic yardsacres Describe anv m^slopos or UgUy trodiblo sods and idornify ihm on tho sUo map. Doscriio tho orosion ^ ^ ^anng and anor oonsmaaion of:bo projoa. a. b. rnnnn/ Vn 6 W.*f pprer.tion Ba^mAV^gaflit A nrnrimnrHv A 53 acfos wUl bc graded with approximately 25,000 cubic yards of soU excavated and Approximately j.5j acres ® ctmirtinn Havden clav loam and Hayden and Lester loam soils ?empc?^ s^iiSon of soUs wUl b. don'e with teed and mulch. Permanent reatoration wUl include planting wetland and upland vegetation. p<^i»r Hill Road Wet Detention BasinAVetlap.dl Approaim.e.y wUi - ■scursrurdTS'Ss.i 3. I prevent erosion “ck'coStJ^So^'en^^^ «if ^on. with teed and mulch. Permanent reamrauon will include planting wetland and upland vegetation. r;^ nf T.nng f ■'ike Wet Detention Basins/Wedand: * rjs ss-s;*,'3r.r2 — rock construction entrance and sUtation curtains wUl also be used where applicable. Te p stabilization of soDs will be done with seed and mulch. Permanent restoration will mclude plant g wetland and upland vegetation, d. T nny Lake Alum Treatment! Alum treatment results in no erosion and sedimentadon concerns. 18. Water Quality - Surface Water Runoff c. 1 |j>04>2D9MuBtLAi»>£AW-AES-^Page 14 of 24 5/24/95 «*• J. 4. b. 1. 7 4>P* • , •• r’jrtntf before arJ after the projea. Describe methods to beampare the irJ q'Miiiry cf .ue rjnoff etpre or , used to manage and/or treat runoff. ronnfv Road ^ Wgt D>»rpnnon Ba^jp/We^laPiL P.ie« 00. ■ ec: phospoorou. removal efficiency offfie combined Deer HUl Road and Counr/ Road No. 6 Basins is approximately PO percent. Hill Ro^H \V>t Deter.ron Ba^^inAVetland: 1. ..«»;«/ nf <;ita runoff The project is designed for the purpose or The project will not 0^=? v J jj,,. jbe design report prepared for the project “Ty^TlI^afrtba. t X-^ovai efficiency of the Deer HUl Road Eaatn u approximately 60 percent. o-.o. nf 1 T If- netenrion BasiltsAVetlacd: The project wUI not change ,o mfsi.r'The d^ai^trpOT'pre^^^ Ke project ”?:uy "d^-'^that me ^sphorous7emoval efficiency of Ute City of Long Lake Basina ts approximately 20 percent. I nny Lalt;y Alum Treatment: The projea wUl no. change me quantity or tpality of surface w.»r mnoff. SSa ■ nhour^her a nnrrienr Wger analysts ts needed). Road Vo ts Wet Detention Bagin/Wetiaail; The creek running ‘"r'“ sjr^nrrasffi^w^'rwC-^ The projea “^5“ removal efficiency of Uie combined!,rHl/C“rcr.yMliri: H ^ 50 percent. ppf»r HiB Pnnd We^ Detention BasjnAVetland: The creek tunning through me site drains Ate me w”Sbu^es join mey drain southeast towards me proposed County Road Nm 6 W« Detention n « 11 aae DNR proteaed wetland prior to ^^^0000. for me construaion of a two-ceil wet detenuon basin nuroose of iiMroving water quality i CSkf “-JS'dafg: re“o1; p«p'a?S^S L^“o^Sf in May es.ima.es mat m. phosphorus removal efficiency of the basin is approximately 60 percent. F\W»AES^Page 15 of 24 5/24/95 3. City of Lon7 T.nVe Wgt Dg^ent ’on Bj^ins/Wetlands: The drainage ditch running through the site, drains approxim^ely 613 awes and rans through an existing segmentation basin pnor to discharging to Long Lake. An addition^ 20 ac^ or drainage .s routed to a second existing sedimenution basin prior to dischargmg to Long Lake. TTie project involves enlar^^ and deepening the two existing basins and routing the larger drainage area through both basins pnor m discharge to Long Lake. TTie projea is designed for the pu^ose of improving water aualitv in Long Lake. The design report prepared tor the projea is May 1995 estimates that the phosphorus VemovaJ efficiency of the basins are approximately *0 percent. 4. Lon? Lake Alum Treanrenr TTie projea wUl not change the quantity or quality of surface water runoff. 19. Water Quality - Wastewaters a. Describe sources, quannries. and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanUary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. Not applicable. h. Describe am y«sste matment methods to be used and five estimates t^amposition t^r tre^nt or if the projea involves on-site treatment sy stems, discuss the suitability of the sue condinoru for sue systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) andestimme the ! on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affea a .ake consult EAW Guidelines about whether nutrient budget analysis is needed.) Not applicable. c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary. Not applicable. 20. Ground Water - Potential for Contanunation a. Approximate depth (in feet) to groundwater: -----minimum^ 1. rniintv Road No 6 Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: average. minimum;1 ft. average. 2. ppgr Hill Rnad Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: minimum;1 ft. average. 3_ ritv of Long Lake Wet Detention Basins/Wetland: minimum;4 ft.average. HtM)! t5>0*-aWVLaneUi»XA W.A£S-0»Page 16 of 24 5/24/95 4. T r.n<T Lake Aln-n Trginr.ent: Alum is disaibured directly into the lake water. ^ sue ,o troue^^erb. Describe any oj ^/.^^^^'^^‘^^^'Z^'^iTcarstcondinons; soils wish high infiltration raxes; abandoned hazards. 1. r..nr,fv Ro?.d Wet Deteniign R^^ipAVetl.a nd; <*»• Not applicable. n.>»r Hill Bnad Hetentinn Pa5iTV^etl:mdi 3. 1. Well Code as part of this project. r;t^ nf T nng ] Wet Detention B.if>in?>AVetl^ Not applicable. 4. T Lake Alub^ Treanr.em: Not applicable. Rnad N^ ^ Wet P-'nV‘"\ P?<i"^'Wetlandl None 2 y^ggr Hill Ro?<1 Wgt Detention B^^ip/W^dasd: None 3^ rff T nng TilV^ Wet Det^nrion None 4 \ nn.7 T.ake Treatment: ■ su.f»e (aluno ..y Guidelines for safe alum dosage m lakes have Iwen d^«opM nuximum dose considered prevent potential iSetiktitaity and pH. In addition, a required approval ftir alum “dm" be'^^i^ed from the DNR through the Ecological Services Division. H.^tt5Vt>*-3)g>Lnnil aigXAW-AES-O^Page 17 of 24 5/24/95 21. Solid Wastes; Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks a. 1. 3. 4. b. 23. Describe the r,Tes. amounts, and camposirions of solid or hazardous wastes to be ge^rated. including c^^<dmanurl. sludges and ashes. Idendfy the method and locanon of dispos^. For projects Te^ra^municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. Not applicable. Tmirry RnaH Vo f, W.t n.t.mion Ba.'iin/'yedM'ill N'o solid or hazardous wastes will be generated by the projea. Sediment is estimated to aratmulam in i^e tot at a^te of approximately 2.500 cubic yards per year. Sedunent wdl be removed as needed and dispo'cu of off-site. Hill Pnnd Wet pefention B^sinAVetland: No solid or hazardous wastes will be generated by the project. Sediment is estimated to accumulaw in me ttt a^e of approximately 4.000 cubic yatds per year. Sediment wdl be removed as needed and disposed of off-site. rirv of T,nnf T .ilfg Wet netention Basins/Wetland: No solid or hazardous wastes wdl be generated by the project. Sediment is estimated to the ponds at a rate of approximately 1,000 cubic yatds pet year. Sediment wdl be removed as needed and disposed of off-site. T nng Lake Alum Treatment: No solid or hazardous wastes will be generated by the project. Micare the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). Not applicable. 22. Traffic Parking spaces addedTraffic t'orang spaces uuucu , Existing spaces (if project inwlves ^ Total Average Daily Traffic (ADV generated____Estimated maximum peak hour S^TZ% ^g Far each ejected road indicate the ADT and the of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimme of the Impact on traffic conge affected roads and describe any traffic improvements which will be necessary. Not applicable. Vehicle-Related Air Emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project s traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the ^ect of traffic mitigJon measures on air quality impaas. Qf the projea involves 500 or more parkmg spaces, consult 'EAW Guidelines’ about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) Not applicable. Page 18 of 24 5/24/95 . ^ - nc Will the projea involve any stcnorjiry sources of air emissions 24. Stationary Source Air Emissio r , yJs fXl No Ifves. describe the sources, quantities, and operancn? [J to II impoa. Also Uiemf, Ae loc^ons of in,ens.ry. or^ o'- sensinve receptors in ^ne viciru , 1. r,„„.n.- Roid So. f '■V"' r>;!emign p.i^ini-Wei|aiidl S }"« ^ ^ The project involves UieTbove'Sivi^. however. pcoje« In addition, a majonr/ ot ±e .oils to problem. If dust becomes a problem, dry sods can Therefore, dust is not expecv^ Tvnical^onstruaion noise from heavy equipment ana be moistened with water aucks are a number of single-family residenual homes expected during consmiction surrounding bluff. The closest home is approxunately north, west and south ot the site on top ^ ^ expected to be unusually noisy, o°ccr“f ap^^SxhnaSy ^Tweoh; every two-three years, 2. H-.n Road Wt.f Detention Rasin/Wetlandj S Yes The project involves excavation and soil. There may be ^enerar^^^ 8 together with frost, excavation is planned dunng e w gjgjj ^in be moist or sanuated with groundwater. In addition, a majority of the soils to ^lem. If dust becomes a problem, dry so’i can Therefore, dust is not expected to be ^q- nQjse from heavy equipment and trucks is be moistened with water trucks, ^ypica^o of single-family residential home tosssrrszs " “Wais no. .rp^sd jo Sinular i».pac«?’"od'^!S.Tp«^ao:^‘^^^^^ (sedim«.t romova.) wO. occur for .pproxunarely two weeks every two-three years. 3 rii. iifT — T -V w-n«gnrion Pssins/Wcrlanit: H J'« Tl.e projecr involves excavarion and rransponation o^she ^e'S.'So^vSl ’p^^^ ^lerrSay be some dust generated during ^b^und together with frost, excavation is planned during the wmter months . jamrated with groundwater. L aSn, aUoriiy 0, the soUs to ^ pro^ is no. expec.«l fo be unusualiy noisy, but 5/24/95 FAW.AES»ljv Page 19 of 24 4 mmsmmmwSimaar tapaos associated «dth operation and matntenance (sediment removal will occur for approximately one week every two-three years. Long Lake Alum Treatment! S No 26. Sensitive Resources Are any of the follo^ng resources on or in proximity to the site: Yes No a. archeological, historical or architectural resources. c. 1. 3. 3.b. prime or unique farmlands? c. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? — d. scenic ^aews or visits? ---- —^ e. other unique resources? -2L. — If luiT items are answered Ya, describe the resource and idratify any impels on the moorce due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? County Road No. 6 Wet Deten tion Basin/Wetland: None 2. nggf Hill Road Wet Detention Basin/Wetland: None rjpy of T ong Lake Wet Detenti on Rasins/Wedandl such that the recreation resource is protected. 4. T ong Lake Alum Treatment! Alum treatment of Long Lake may require a ban on lake use for up to one week application of the alum and settlement of the polymerized aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)j) Fioc. e. Other unique resources? 1 r;^nntv Road No. 6 Wet Detention Basin/Wedand: The Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area (WWSNA) is located approximately 1,000 feet M:^llW)^3W\LflBtLaki-£AW.A£S-Ijv Page 20 of 24 5/24/95 the W'WSNA and in no ways impjca it. • .Vienna nimral wetlands A wetland delineation was peribrmed and it was Tie reposed sue contains -p^e weUand was classified as t)-pe PFOIC (Type V determined fiat a a. /6 „p |ajg«t pottion of the wetland. The proposed and PEMB (Type 2) with PFOIC vJyP ^ nrnnosed oroiect would impact the above wetland by project would impact the above upland into a two^'e'l -vi detention basin/wetland. The basin wUl have a ^id vllue wUl require additional off-site mitigation to meet peiS"menr nl Sohal wedand mitigation is proposed in conjunction with me Deer Hdl Road site. -7 Deer Hill Wet Hefention Pasin/Wetlandi ■■ n. .u.» »«.«—. -——rwi... - in no ways impacts it. • e- T n-amni wetlands A wedand delineation was performed and it was The proposed site conuins existin, wedand was classified as type PEMBd (Type determined that a f 7pu's“'^(Type 4) Tie proposed project would impaa tie above wetland 2) with a very small area of PUBFx , J' „ L ^to a two-cell wet detention lLXeti1^d.’'-Se'bL1n“lffl ha “e a fringe wetland area of 5.65 acres and a deep water habiut area of 3.75 acres. 3 Pity of T.nng T Wet Deypntinn Basins/Wedanjl None Identified. 4. f,nn<y Lake Alum Treatment. Not Applicable. stacks.) [ J Yes pC] No. If yes, explain. ”■ S'i“' re sol ved. If no, exp I oin. N :V01 Page 21 of 24 5/24/95 M!n.eh.ha w.„r.h>d pr iiirt Manaiemem Plan «r >“.™ p E^SS s .*- »«. »«■>«;“' *; <™« -I , jDDrovad ta 1993 The esublished need documented in the approved plan, calls for a reduraon ot Sm ^d nonlpotot soS« pollutant loads to Long Lake and Lake Minnetonka. All of the four project components are consistent with these goals. 1. rnnnrv Road Nn 6 Wet D»tPnrinn BasinAVetlandl A permanent access road wUl be construaed along the east side of the two-celled basin to allow for periodic sediment removal from the basins. Of»gf Hill Rnad Wet Detention Basin/Wetl^dl A permanent access road wUI be constructed along the east side of the two-celled basin to all for periodic sediment removal from the basin. 3 rifv nf T-nn? T alee Wet Detention Bas/j-fWetly.dsi Not applicable. 4. y nny T ake Alum Treatment: Not applicable. 30. Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts ! Are fumre stages of this development planned or likely? [ J Yes [X] No If yes, briefly describe future stages, their timing, and plans for environmental review. b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier projea? [ ] Yes PQ No t If yes briefly describe the past development, its timing, and any past envtronmemal review. and the other development. 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the projea may cause any adverse * which were not addressed by items 1 to 28, idenrijy and discuss them here, along with any prop mitigation. No other potential environmental impacts have been identified at this time. N:^l tJ'<H*3WVLontL*i«JSAW-AES'^Page 22 of 24 5/24/95 , , m,ii xiricn nttd mt it axwltttd iftht EAV is iting dots for E/S seeping: 32. Srnmarj of Issue iTnis ^ becision doament which must accompasy the issstted. oddrtss rtltvons require fisnhtr insesdgadon before ihe condinons. N:y)ltJ'0^3WLoo»IjJ»-EAW*AES^Page 23 of 24 5/24/95 HENNEPIN CO MINNESOTA NTY llpui 0^ HATg 15-22-95 M OLM MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT General Locotion Map Wenck may 1995 W0mck jMnfiatfT 1m. ttOO ^mr C/Mfe BOX 42B EartrontomntMl gtmlD*cn Uoo»m P*o^ XN 55359- Figure No.1 • • ^C^3 —■. V. •■ - -_ - .^>vj • r*' • ' • '' _ ^/ ■- "r-.- : o :^^ . ■ •> . rC&'r-sj- -^r "v '’- - i ■ ~ '-^' ^ J* - - ' _:' >- ~ ---*’'i!^ «.‘-'~ - ■ • ^.” ' " ^___________________________L*!.-..- -~ 5 ~ •»‘’ ~^ ' ^ ^ -1- - '•' - .^ - I •' 1-''^**'$^^ ” *1- * T^-Z. ~ ~ '' -• -<4. .%#,v •v ••—'Tp *TV •ar»»_'-u * •C40* — ft ^ * **•* KoLs/eid Lak€'" tOCf «3f£^ \ ^cLOCATIO_N m m J —- r -9 ________________ , <r^m V. ' 2^i<r PROJECT ■.— LOCATION*^ :v > "oRONo 2^-.*^^' A* ■ ^ -/- KK-^ h •../• A ffs - V ■V. ------------- . -^ y 1 ' - 9 ’ ■ i i£i fcj-i « «gtrt‘^ / i. uoi - V I * • • • •2Xo-»MJ.-r ./ K-y i-. • I I - I mm m ^ .za iiK->-g i.'<x ■i.t—-s -L ( i z ■ •' • = PROJECT ~ .*. LOCATION ?— \ -1 =— 'R* =:-r; ‘ T’^C.XCr-^ ;• -«*:?■ I scale 1:24 000 0 laoo 1000 20X)3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET I KILOWETER MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Project Location Mco ^^Wenck YancM AaaoelAlA 1800 W^4«r CfH Cmtmr P.O. 90X 428 U4joi« PM*'. *4N 55358 “0429 __________ may 1995 Figure No.2 la*. M».« • ^/".’.'.V . 4ai • * V \ 4-:- V y-w-<•;’"■'\‘\u, . \\ r**" V \\ *'\,:j; \ >v . V %m aiMt#M»<MHi 9 liitOiM ^^,-',p^vu.i.y»i ,’v V' \\i'i/-SK!K:“''»« •■ mmvifys* I MH m /'v'l»•* • •» • •• • w • 9 ^ ^ ___r-.rurr-iT I pnw Miu nifiirACCISS flOAO' HI ocuit lAltfllACt IIO«0 *'4 KlU --------^-• • . ■ * •' • ■ ll •'• ■* . ■-•- •• - -•" /L^ ■ ■' ' ‘ m , r-. \ ivWv/Tv^f,' • ■.>:v\-r;s5s-' V •', I. .•' ^ * • '.*L ■•S.VJ, /V'///,, : /'•>/ ^ •.. '• ■*i'(u.'.\V-.-; .: ;. /:>:v\V .V ’ \' V/|'< V -Sw S. V *J »‘ v"** . 'i'* " • * '" *'■vvv r<C'.'r V. \ .11- ^ 'w *v/ ** • \ \ * * A*' . • ' .'t-l'.':''/.-:;^ S ' ■■ ■ / / ' ' i.i: •:> f V • > , lovcNriov smcuMC / • '. . ‘isa 1KCI D 0# u roN • ft • 4 t ’ *i I I / -T \ ■»• ’ * * 7* *■ r . • C.* iV.»’\' :1*‘*< * * IIOLVIID } v.iiv j t ;•• 1 : • ••» ...'i,';i,-, . ■COOS ICIfNTiriC maim aaia . /i I •V 1'.\\ \ » 1^ fiaosiONi •\\ . I OC^IM *\ 4.1 OU. fO». I »h ArWt octa 1l /t \•» „ • ----------------------------» r . I ' 1 .' ■• ^ *. * I . / \'' /' ' - :• >o :'\> ‘ ■z'^^'<H-h:— \ ' V - ' \ } ' \'\* 'A :\ ~ ~y V ■--------------------------------4^0---------------------—'^, . -T V • ^ » _____ / «20 i» If cir - ®._—^r—--------'^•“/—•■=•—■ ! //;.•" * ^-.r_----------•-.:—.. , •. / //•■. \ ♦. ■•A'.-.x A. • A‘V.>VV.\ •vV •' / '••^'V 'V. *• / '•'.•VT*J-------rf"^- -£r.;v- /.n V '■ '•■ -O'A \i ■M -■ ' ty ' . :r ■ \ * . • ‘ \ ?l * •ACCCS^ kom* s \ ‘\ /'; ■■ *• V ''' i \ :. •' V V * \ t»>\ ■••. ‘A 'v s»€ti Fcc wcw ctrv. kio\ -' 'A. ••• ■ £"-‘ iBSTto; cnioei J, .’ <- WlOCAUD TO >-^ '| • •SP^.l»ATaOCAIlON^I^•^^ . V '• ■•• I : . • ' ' < I' : ’’v A«> 'VonwAuo-/- I-'-/>'■» • ■• v\ -•■• • ' !' \ \ .'s ' t • '=«^^.•;. ■.| T»« i/vBwtuMB; //;v ; ! 1 -"v iv; 1J 0 I 1 I ■• • “■. :v • -A • ■------------------ * ■ » \. N • • ■■ * S ^ ' * * . I* •• •" r*i • - - ^ *r i* * 1 / • * ! ^ • I lECENO lilSTlMC CLCVATICM --- contour PHOPOSCO Ilf VAT ION - CONTOUR - - - - - - - -PRQPCRIT LINC PROPOSCO SPOT (LCVAT ION :Oq PROPOiCO J-LI ti€NCCNT VCCCIAIIQN ^ jJa PROPOStO ____ ^ MJOCCO tcTLAi I t U5 8 ! i I Mn ■» L f .•#<*•. Wenck Wenck Associates, Inc. Lnvironmcnul Engineers IROO Pioneer Creek Center M.ipic Plain, MN 55359 1-80(M72-2232 (612) 479-4200 Fax (612) 479-4242 24 Weston, S.W. Grand Rapids, Ml 49503 (616) 776-9066 Fax (616) 776-9916