The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-13-1995 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 13, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MLNNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. Donation of Wildlife Print to City by David Maass * 2. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of Februar> 27, 1995 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Lili McMillan 4. Cr>'stal Bay Play Ground Conceptual Plan PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Charles Nolan Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 5. #1457 Alan G. Carlson, Crystal Creek Subdivision - Request to Extend Preliminary Subdivision Approval - Resolution 6. #1929 A1 Seran, 4099 Highwood Road - Variance - Resolution 7. #1990 Robert W. Carlson, 710 Gander Road - Vacation of Easement - Resolution 8. #1992 James and Joann Jundt, 1420 Bracketts Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Resolution 9. #1996 Gregg Perl, 309 Westlake Street - Variance - Resolution 10. #1997 Sally and Jonathan Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West - Variances - Resolution 11. #1998 Craig Wicklund, 3780 Bayside Road - Variances - Resolution 12. Sewer Connection. 372 Westlake Street *13. 1995 Joint Use Dock License - Big Island Veterans Camp - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMLNISTRATOF S REPORT 14. Schedule Counci ’ Vv\,rl; ..'ssion 15. Bike Trail Easement \tquisition 16. Spring Clean-Up Date and Fees 17. Highwood Nature Trial Parking Lot and Signage 18. Re-Allocation of CDBG Funds - Resolution 19. Barking Dog Ordinance Amendment AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 13, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, iVHNNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*20.) LICENSES (♦21.) BILLS LT»COMING JSSUTS AND EVENTS 03/13 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/14 - Highway 12 Mediation meeting 3:00 p.m. 03/14 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/15 - Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. 03/16 - .Toint Park Commission/Planning Commission Work Session - Preservation of Open Space 6:30 p.m. 03/20 - Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/22 - School Board meeting 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. 03/27 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 04/03 - Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. 04/10 - School Board Training Session 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. 04/10 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 04/11 - School Board Training Session 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. 04/11 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. 04/17 - Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. 04/18 - Jim Ramstad, Member of Congress - Town Meeting 6-9:00 p.m. 04/24 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 04/25 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. 04/26 - 1995 Board of Review 7:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE lU . 1.:^ ' ^ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. MiO^A£l Pei^LMAiJ iUo I4wy SS'Hib k.“ii ^ / 0 “ <V (j cio ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 27, 1995 ^ s * ’ • t ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members J. Diann Goetten and Charles Kelley. Mayor EdwarcT Callahan, Jr. and Council Member JoEllen Hurr were absent. Representing Staff were Acting City Administrator John Gerhardson, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Acting Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p m. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded to amend the Agenda of the City Council Meeting ot February 27, 1995, to include Item #4A, Application #1994. Robert Wolff, 4450 Forest Lake Landing for an Amended Variance Resolution Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#1) 7:00 P.M. PtBLIC HEARING - CDBG PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS CDBG ALLOCATION OF FUNDS - RESOLUTION #3527 -7:00-7:15 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Gerhardson reported that the City ofOrono will received $23,918 in 1995 from the Community Development Block Grant Program. The public hearing notification, which is required for citizen input, listed the following for recommended allocation of the CDBG funds: We Can 5 1,500 Westonka Intervention 1,500 Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners (lOCP) 1,500 Housing and Rehabilitation 16,418 Sewer Connection Grant 3,000 Roseanne and Dick L'Allier represented Sojourner Adult Day Program. Mrs. L'Allier said that Mn/DOT awarded Sojourner a grant for a vehicle which is wheel-chair accessorized The grant will pay for 80% of the vehicle. The other 20% of the cost, which is about $8,000, is to come fi-om the community. Sojourner, located in Spring Park, is asking for a contribution from the City of Orono through this CDBG program. L'Allier said this program allows adults, who would otherwise be institutionalized, remain in their community by relieving the caregivers by providing an adult day program. Mr. L'Allier is a participant in the program The participants are brought to the program by other means, but the vehicle in question is used for field trips. Sojourner serves the communities of Orono, Spring Park, Excelsior, Wayzata, and Mound, who will also be asked for donations to help pay for the vehicle. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27, 1995 (#1 - CDBG Public Hearing - Continued) Gerhardson asked L’AIlier if Sojourner meets the Hennepin County eligibility requirements regulating this program L’AIlier did not know and asked that the City contact Sally Hebson of Sojourner regarding the requirements. Council recommended reallocating $1,500 from the Housing and Rehabilitation ponion to this program if qualified. Dan and Val Hessburg represented Westonka Intervention and reported that the amount requested by their program had been increased to $1,800 this year. Their proposed shelter will be coming before the Council in the near future. W estonka has asked all contributing communities for more money this year Margaret Holste represented WeCan, which serv es the West Tonka area. Holste presented WeCan's budget from their audit to the Council. Holste reported that this procram initially served emergency needs and budget counseling, but has now added jobs-in-training to their program, and ask for continuation of the $1,500 contribution. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to amend CDBG Allocation of Funds, Resolution #3527, as; Westonka Intervention portion to $1,300 and add Sojourner Adult Day Program, if they meet the eligibility requirements, in the amount of $1,500. These additional amounts would come from the Housing and Rehabilitation allocation. Ayes 3. Nays 0. (*#2) CONSENT AGENDA Item #5 was added to the Consent Agenda Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended Ayes 3, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#3) REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13,1995 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of February 13, 1995. Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Park Commissioner Robert Howells had no comments. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There was no representative of the Planning Commission present. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27, 1995 POLICE CHIEF REPORT Chief Sulliv an reported that both new part-time officers, Persell and Melton, have completed the FTO program and are doing well as productive members of the police department. Sullivan also reported on the recent counterfeiting case. The Orono Police Department, being the predominant police agency in the investigation, will receive from the federal government 90% of any forfeited assets recovered. $10,000 in real money was recovered, and Sullivan expects the City to realize about $9,000 Jabbour commented that the City and Mayor received letters from the U. S. Treasury Department and the Secret Service complimenting the police unit on their work in this investigation. Jabbour extended his appreciation of the excellent teamwork shown. Jabbour also said two letters, including one from the Mound Police, were received in commendation of excellent police work by Officer English. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#*4) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES: BIG ISLAND INC. - RESOLUTION #3528 PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - RESOLUTION #3529 CARLSON/NELSON/GAGE - RESOLUTION #3530 SANDY BEACH - RESOLUTION #3531 FOREST ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - RESOLUTION #3532 WALTERS PORT ASSOCIATION - RESOLUTION #3533 MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON - RESOLUTION #3534 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3528 through #3534 directing staff to issue Joint Use Dock Licenses for Sandy Beach Place, Nelson/Gage/Carlson, Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Association, Big Island, Inc., Walters Port Maintenance and Improvement Association. Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association, Inc., and Minnetonka Power Squadron. Ayes 3, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27,1995 (#4A) #1994 ROBERT AND VELMA WOLFF, 4450 FOREST LAKE LANDING AMENDED VARUNCE APPLICATION - RESOLUTION #3535 Mr. & Mrs. W'olff were present. Mabusth reported that the original application involving a 3-season porch was approved in August of 1994 and involved an average lakeshore setback, hardcover in the 75-250' zone, side setback variances, with hardcover not to exceed 45 5®i) (originally at 51.9'5i>). The applicant has rexised their application to replace the proposed 3-season porch with a 5x26' addition to the principal structure and a 5x26' extension of the deck on the lake side. The structure would be located outside of the 75' zone but would encroach 5' further into the average lakeshore setback area. The structure has ^een designed at a 45 degree angle to eliminate any sighting problems for the property on the north. A side setback variance is no longer required under this amended application. The Planning Commission's concern was to reduce the amount of hardcover. The application would maintain hardcover at 45 3% with the removal of 333 s.f of plastic underliner and 246 s f of paved area and the addition of 105 s f of new deck and 30 s.f of patio stones to replace the paved patio The application received unanimous approval provided the hardcover requirement was met. There had been no public comments The neighbor most impacted reported being satisified and signed the acknowledgment form. Goetten was still concerned with the large amount of hardcover being on a substandard lot. This area is zoned for one acre lots. Wolff reported that the house is as it was originally built in 1964 on the 50' lot, and the spacing of the boards on the deck will allow water to drain down into the grass below. Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the amended variance application. Resolution #3535. Ayes 3, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Council had no report. ENGINEER REPORT (*#5) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #3 - BROWN ROAD NORTH RECONSTRUCTION Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve request for paxTuent #3 in the amount of $66,723.01 to Buffalo Bituminous. Ayes 3. Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27,1995 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•#6) ESTABLISH DATE FOR OLD BEACH ROAD CLOSURE PUBLIC HEARING Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to schedule a public hearing regarding the permanent closure of Old Beach Road for 7:00 p m on Monday, April 24, 1995. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (*ni) BID AWARD WATER STORAGE TANK Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the sale of one used water tank to the City of Medina for an amount of 54,000. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (*#8) MARCH 9 WORK SESSION Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to schedule a work session for 8.00 a.m. on Thursday, March 9 for discussion of issues related to Highway 12. Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett had no report. (*#9) LICENSES vioetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the following licenses: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Septic System Installers License; J. B. Diggers Anoka, MN 55303 Elmer J. Peterson, Co. Delano, MN 55328 Thompson Plumbing Corp. Minnetonka, MN 55345 Site Evaluator/Designer License: Widmer, Inc St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 Otto Assoc. Engineers & Land Surveyor, Inc Buffalo, MN 55313 S-P Testing, Inc. St. Michael, MN 55376 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27, 1995 (*^10)BILLS Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Kelle>’ moved, Goetten seconded, to adjourn at 7:25 p.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 27,1995 (*#10)BILLS Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve pa>-ment of the .All Funds Account. Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to adjourn at 7;25 p.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Acting Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION y; a, DATE: March t ^ .ITEM NO.; ^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1457 Alan Carlson, 3140 Watertown Road - Request for Founh Extension of Preliminary Subdivision Approval Pertinent Ordinance Section 11.10, Subdivision 15 - Refer to Exhibit C. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - Applicant ’s Request Crystal Creek Plat Section 11.10, Subdivision 15 Resolution No. 3392 Approving Third Year Extension of Preliminary Subdivision Approval (Extension Date 4/8/95) Highway 12 Southern Bypass Routes Impacting the Subject Property Discussion The twelve lot plat of Crystal Creek received preliminary approval from the City of Orono on April 8, 1991. In early 1992 Mn/DOT developed corridor alternatives for an expanded 394 corridor that included a southern bypass. The two southern alternative routes have a major impact on the proposed twelve lot subdivision. Since that approval date, applicant has requested extensions until the Highway 12 corridor matter is resolved, hopefully in 1995. Review Exhibit A, applicant now seeks a fourth extension. It is the applicant ’s hope that this will be the last and final request for an extension of preliminary subdivision approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve the enclosed resolution granting a fourth extension of preliminary subdivision approval now extending the effective date of preliminary subdivision approval to April 8, 1996. Council may either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT, CRYSTAL CREEK - FILE NO. 1457 WHEREAS, on March 15, 1994, the City Council of the Cit> Orono adopted Resolution No. 339?. granting an extension of preliminary approval of a plat proposed by applicant, Alan G. Carlson, involving the property located at 3140 Watenown Road; and 8, 1995; and WHEREAS, the effective period of preliminary plat extension expires on April WHEREAS, the applicant has advised Council that he is unable to fulfil the conditions of preliminary plat approval until the issue of the option of a southern bypass for the Highway 12 improvement is resolved; and WHEREAS, applicant has demonstrated a substantial financial commitment during the review of the preliminary subdivision application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono that the effective penod of preliminary plat approval for Alan G. Carlson ’s proposed plat known as Crystal Creek involving the property located at 3140 Watertown Road and as originally approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 2948, adopted April 8,1991, is hereby extended to April 8, 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13th day of March, 1995. Page 1 of 2 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ’ Notary Public Page 2 of 2 ft' MERCHANT & GOULD Mfrcfeaat. Goald. Saith. Edell. Welter A Schmidt Profession^ Vssociauon Pilent. Trademark k Copsrmht Lawyers Direct Dial: 334*4433 UOO Voidest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis. Minnesota V)40J 41 I! ISA PHONE 612/332 5300 FAX 612/33200H1 John D Gould Robert T Edell Paul A belter Cecil C Schmidt John S Sumners Alan G Carlson Ear! D Reiland Charles E Golla Douitlas I Williams D our U s a Strawbndge Albert L I nderhill D Randall King Michael B Laskv Curtis B Hamre Michael D Schumann Michael L Mau .John A Clifford Mark J DiPietro Timoth) R Conrad Alan W Kowalchyk Daniel W. McDonald Randall A. Hillson John P Sumner Wendy M. McDonald Linda M. Byrne Mark D. Schuman Albin J Nelson Brian H Batzli David K Tellekson John J Gresens John L Beard Philip P Caspers • Douglas P Mueller Ronald A Daignault Rob<*rt J Crawford ••• Paul E Lacy Gregory .A Sebald Robert C. Beck Kristine M. Sirodthoff Steven C Bruess Andrew D Sorensen Katherine M. Kowalchyk J Derek Vandenburgh Mark A Krull Alan G. Gorman Joseph M Kastellc Theodore R. Plunkett John C Reich Thomas E. Bejln Dennis R Daley Scott A. Stinebrune^ Charles G Carter Leslie E. Dalglish Jerome R Smith Dawn M. LarNen Karen D McDaniel Lance L. Vietake Michael R. Cohen Mark A. Hollingsworth David G Schmaltz Valerie L Calloway James R. Chiapetta Sandra J Epp Ryan Julie R Daulton Michael A. Dryja Scott W Johnston Paul H Beattie MarySusan H GabiUn • Steven J Pollinger Cole M Fauver Patent Aqrnt Thomas A. Hassing • Not AdmUled In Minnesota mar 1 1995 . 5 February 28, 1995 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Indian Creek (Now Crystal Creek) Subdivision Dear Jeanne: I am writing to ask that you place an item on the agenda of the next Council meeting. Under Section 11.10, subd. 15, I request an extension of the effective period of the preliminary plat approval for one year. In April of 1991, Council granted a preliminary approval of my plat, file number 1457. However, the proposed Highway 12 corridor froze the project. The southern corridor traverses the heart of the property. We discussed what action I could take to keep the approvals active and current. We agreed that I should file a request for an extension of the effective period of the approval. I appeared before the Council in 1992, and the issue was thoroughly reviewed. The Council acknowledged that the Highway 12 corridor study had effectively frozen my property for development purposes. My request for the extension was granted, and it was noted that more than a one-year extension might be necessary. Extensions were granted in 1993 and 1994 as because there had been no resolution of the highway issue and the picture was as cloudy as ever. Each year, we noted that even another one-year extension will likely prove inadequate. That has proven to be the case. MinneapoIi5 Sain! Paul Lo< Ang»‘li»A Jeanne A. Mabusth February 28, 1995 Page 2 MnDot has stated that they expect the issue to be resolved this year. I trust that tnis will be the last extension. The indecision about the highway has been very harmful to me and the other Orono residents with property along the proposed corridors. I encourage the Orono Council members to do their utmost to resolve the situation. I would be happy to appear before the Council to answer any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, AGC:Imb B • • ... * a o* > ■■ m rrA/" ^ •»•••« 9 »m ' m *9 M« It ^ipr-T'- S 11.10 Subd. 14. Special Requirements For Plats. A. Zoning Regulations. Every plat shall conform to existina zonina regulations and subdivision regulations applicable at the time of Final Plat approval. Variances shall not be aoproved to increase the overall subdivision density above the minimum lot area requirements of the applicable zoning district and this Chapter. B. Public Improvements. The Planning Commission may recommend that all public improvements be installed and dedicated prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the City. If the Planning Commission does not recommend that public imorovements be installed and dedicated prior to signing of the Final Plat by the City, the amount of the bond shall be established bv the Zoning Administrator based upon the recommendation of the City Engineer, which bond shall be submitted by the subdivider at the time of application for Final Plat approval. The Planning Commission shall require the subdivider to indicate on the plat all private and public improvements, which shall be required to be established or extended and any other special requirements deemed necessary by the Planning Commission in order to conform the plat to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan and this Chapter. C. Grading of Site Prior to Final Approval. Subsequent to Preliminary Plat approval by the Council, the subdivider may apply for a land alteration permit from the City and uDon receipt of such permit may commence construction to the grades and elevations required by plans approved by the City. D. Referral to Other Government Agencies or Jurisdictions. Following action by the Council on the Preliminary Plat, the Zoning Administrator will refer the Preliminary Plat and the Council's action to other government agencies or jurisdictions for their review and action as may be appropriate prior to Council action on the Final Plat. _ Subd. 15. Effective Period of Preliminary Subdivision Review. Planning Commission recommendations concerning any Class I Subdivision and the Council resolution concerning any Class II and Class III Preliminary Plat shall remain effective for one year. Failure to file a complete Final Subdivision application within this time period shall be construed as formal withdrawal of the proposed subdivision. For one year following preliminary approval, unless the subdivider and the City agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations, the City may extend e period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to a applicable performance conditions and requirements, of it n^ay require submission of a new application unless substantial physica ORONO C!436 (4-1-84) (f: § 11.10 activity and investment \^jer *«\u*^su£f« d^m^^'e^ Vs "a ro^nse^.VencVVV'VVeVuitement to submit a new application. Subd. 16. Final Subdivisions. TTinai <^uhdivision review is the third stace ot t:ne sVodivVIiln'tel^^ aoDCOval. B. Requirements. The V„<^/\,'/,rio=Vments furnish -®“'''tr'Jh4 HeVVeoW County Recorder’s Office, suitable for recording m the r-hanaes required as part incorporating all Review and resolution of preliminary of the preliminary subdivision revie d ^^^^^ij-ements shall be c. Prerequisite. ^ Pj^^®(,j^,,e^Seen aVoWeeV by" the substantially the same of anv Final Subdivision council within one year °?.'‘'® i^trator shall review each Final aopiication. The Zoning ,-tial conformity to the Subdivision ^atio^ns^ on the preliminary subdivision,requirements and representations on cne pt D. Substantial Change ^and/or the The zoning Administrator ®="^bdivision Ipplication council may refuse to ^i"®\he approved preliminary which is substantially diff ’ui^ misreorascntations on th0subdivision, « which discloses pos^s^ib^le^misr^p__^ i preliminary subdivision. In . subdivider to resubmit the Administrator or Council may iteration, and may require proposal for Planning Commission documents or ?he^ subdivider to submit ^_^^t,di^ision review. Planning information required for hearing if so Commission reconsideration may incluc^ ronina^Administrator. The required by the Planning Commission n/2) the applicable subdivider shall pay a fee i^ed r^preliminary subdivision review fee for requi ^ preliminary any proposal occurring within one year ot subdivision approval date. Subd. 17. Final Subdivision Application. A. All Subdivisions. the^^foUo^wfng^'^to be applications shall include one or all of the determined by the Zoning Administrator. (4-1-84) ORONO CC 437 CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 8 ~______ D \ resolution GR.YNTING EXTENSION OF THF rmcwE PMOD OF preliminary plat approval ^“r ^™ St.AL creek , application no . 1457 xATTctur rm March 8 1993 the Citv ’ Council of the City of Orono adopted R„o,.io„applicant, Alan G. Carlson, involvmg the propert>- located at 3140 wateno n W-HEREAS, the effective period of preliminary plat e.xtension e.xpires on April 8. 1994; and WHFREAS the applicant has advised Council that he is unable to fulfill *e conditions of pS pla-PP-al until the issue of the option of a southern bypass for the Hiehway 12 improvement is resolved, and WHEREAS, applicant has demonstrated a substantial financial commitment during the review of the preliminary subdivision application. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Ci^ of Orono that the effective period of preliminary P'Wat“ RoaWas Sly apS“—- 'ofTesdution 2948, adopted April 8. 1991, is hereby extended to April 8, 1995. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a tegular meeting held this 14th day of sVIarch, 1994. ATTEST: Bo rothv M: HaHiii. Cu> €terlc Page 1 of 2 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLTVCIL o Q 0, O\ n C O ------------ D STATE OF NANNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instmment^as acjaipwledgedbefore ■n^ontto ldAday of Mareh ,994 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. .S: .Mayor of .he ^ Orono a Minnesota mumcipal corporation and said instntment was e.xecu.ed on behalf of the City. JAMIE L BOSMAICTARY PUBUOMlNNESOm HWHffWCOU^ My Comm, 12*19-87 Page 2 of 2 f'-' ^ .jw■ :>:VV^''‘: t^;ig-'ll 1. '4^ WM.-- «i *a?kk'> c^..1 ^ « .«"* *‘A.*'- • • • •V » • -y;v.^. * »-» •- ,«, ^ I* * \ 1 !it •’» \ »V'‘ W *• V i*V‘i » . ' M*. f' V -*♦ V. - -j. »r.ii ,\ ►.*♦» {ft •\'| ■'gi’ «•* ' ■ t *♦ ‘'H' V- ‘-^B \^ «1 ♦'. ]j4 \ ;. • ■ .\W'5&?*.' ■ "•, -i'jX•1 ■ i' H •■*'" ^82kX'•mV ,4 • ' f ■r k’ - 'n « •' M •;;*«» . *1 f :• > ’ I: V. viX ■ • - F* »- ..i J '2ft;- «■R-rWiL ^ % V <5i ?’ < * V. V\5\‘ /.-.’A jy />¥ X, i^i A mm^:n f V ^ .» ai r ^ ^ i vi;-,'A i". u 'S1 •) • G I i ;v,VjV. I .**? ..t f rM- t Hr - I •. .1 ; V • / ♦ • v*V > V X I t V V i': i. r ^ r, »» v< ' 1 ''* >ij • r- r'l &:■ i 1 fr Jka-. * 4 {in’J' 1 ' -‘•i >^iV' r X ^ « r j' > "•iJ "#^.■';;u'.’-'^-y r 4 4.» -\ *•*'Si!i^;?'!i.’)*i\' S f* » - I' V. 1 ; :»,:. '. ■««.• 4#.^^ . L V !:«' X I, V".'.' I ■;i‘ •'■>••• 1 v ’ . ''■••!■'7, .' ♦ A./ .^1^^/•1 ,. SC 4'H Hi r%h rk 1l-\11*-^ i >v .5 Mil' : W**V SJ'Sjiis ••• •• --‘ ' •' ■ V'^ inreil^Fn' '-c^ mm ■■.'V *'■ ijihl'^r" - -^rlf ’v /•'•A/* REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; March^^iPS. ITEMNO.: \ Department Approval: iName .Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1929 A1 Seran, 4099 Highwood Road - Variances - Resolution Application: Request for lot area/lot width, hardcover, lot coverage, and side setback variances to allow replacement of existing residence structure. List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Grading/Drainage Plan C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 5/20/94 D - Planning Commission Minutes 5/16/94 E - Memo and Exhibits of 5/13/94. Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of 5/13/94. Briefly, applicant proposes to remove the existing residence structure and replace it with a new two story home with basement walkout. This is a 1/4 acre lot on Highwood Roau, 50’ in width and typical of the small lots in that neighborhood. Technically, a lot area and width variance is required. The existing house is offset to the east side of the lot, about 5.4’ from the east lot line. Applicant requests a side setback variance of 4.2 ’, and proposes to construct the new house approximately 5.8’ from the lot line (see Exhibit H) in an attempt to save the two manire trees located on the property. Existing lot coverage hv structures is 19.3% where 15% is allowed. Proposed is 18.4%, the reduction due to a slight decrease in the house footprint. 0-75 ’ hardcover consists of an existing retaining wall with no proposed changes. In the 75-250 ’ zone, hardcover is proposed to decrease from 51.0% to 49.3%. Applicant was advised to provide detailed drainage and grading plans to confirm there will be no impact on neighboring properties and confirming that building height will meet requirements. These plans are attached as Exhibit B and have been reviewed and approved by staff. Applicant has also provided a cardboard model of the site which illustrates the grading plan. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 March 9. 1995 Zoning File #1929 ____ These plans are attached as Exhibit B and have been reviewed and approved by staff. Applicant has also provided a cardboard model of the site which illustrates the grading plan. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their May 16th meeting and recommended approval on a vote of 5-1, subject to applicant providing suitable grading/drainage plan for staff review and approval. Planning Commissioner Rowlette voted against the motion, having reservations regarding the hardcover percentage. Planning Commission accepted applicant’s justification for the side setback variance, such justification including the attempt to save the two mature trees by not further encroaching into their root systems, and noting that the adjacent house to the east is offset to the east side of its lot, hence the "crowding" effect will be niinimized. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution, COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution granting variances to lot area, lot width, side setback, lot coverage and 75-250 hardcover for construction of a new residence at 4099 Highwood Road. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B), 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), 10.22, SUBDIVISION (2) AND 10.56, SL^BDIVISION 16 (L) FILE mi9 WHEREAS, Alonzo B Seran, III (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 4099 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 14, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for certain variances to allow replacement of the existing residence structure on the property with a new residence structure, including a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) for existing lot area of 10,250 s.f. where lot area of 43,560 s.f. is normally required, for existing lot width of 50’ where required lot width is normally 140’, and for a proposed east side setback of 5.8’ where a 10’ side setback is normally required; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to allow lot coverage by structures of 18.4% where only 15% lot coverage is normally allowed; and a variance to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow hardcover in 75-250’ zone at a level of 49.3% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1929. 2.The property is located within the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 16,1994, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings; A. B. C. E. F. G. There is no adjacent land available to increase the lot size from the existing 10,250 s.f. to the required 43,560 s.f. to meet the LR-IB Zoning District standards. Similarly, no additional land is available to increase the existing 50’ lot width to the 140’ LR-IB standard. The existing lot width and area nre consistent with other developed residential lots in this neighborhood. A residence has existed on the property for many decades. The existing residence is 5.4’ from the east side lot line where a 10’ side setback is normally required. The proposed new residence will be approximately 5.8’ from the east side lot line, but cannot be located to be 10’ from the side lot line without endangering a mature tree located on the west side of the property. Further, many homes in the area are located off center of the lot, and the setback variance may preserve the look of the neighborhood as well as preserve views for homes located north of Highwood Road. Existing lot coverage by structures is 19.3% where only 15% is normally allowed. The proposed decrease to 18.4% will be more conforming than the existing lot coverage percentage. The decrease in lot coverage is due to a slight reduction of house footprint with the proposed construction as compared to the existing house. Existing hardcover in the 75-250’ zone is 51%, and with the proposed plan will be reduced to 49.3%. Hardcover in the 0-75 zone is oidy 1.2%. There is no excessive hardcover on the property that can be easily removed to reduce the hardcover percentage to a more conforming level. Applicant should provide a grading and drainage plan confirming there will be no impact on neighboring properties. Page 2 of 6 4. The applicant has provided grading and drainage plans confirming that there will be no negative impacts on the neighboring properties. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances for replacement of the existing residence at 4099 Highwood Road, including variances to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) for existing lot area of 10,250 s.f. where lot area of 43,560 s.f. is normally required, for existing lot width of 50’ where required lot width is normally 140’, and for a proposed east side setback of 5.8’ where a 10 ’ side setback is normally required; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to allow lot coverage by strucmres of 18 where only 15% lot coverage is normally allowed; and a variance to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow hardcover in 75-250’ zone at a level of 49.3% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 0-75’ setback zone shall not increase above the existing 1.2%. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone shall be limited to 49.3% per the proposed plan. Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will likely not be approved without concurrent reductions in existing hardcover. Page 3 of 6 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant shall conform to the proposed approved grading plans and shall take whatever steps are necessary to ensure no increased drainage impacts on neighboring properties. No other variances are granted with this approval. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by complete application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions ot this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Propeny Owner(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13ih day of March, 1995, by Edward J. cilahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of____, 1.99 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ___day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s' described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 4 I- i • -li f ■? •• *i>n.i *NLo^ 7fUitJg - VVi, _ _ ^‘//.77 •<Ar,r 5/7.77 5J5 77 : o.-.* . “3^c 5 o CD O o tn 5: S SSi'’ HOMCflUtDTJaJ r-Ooooammc c; ------- m 2> H t- ( m 2o>G u,S9oO nr OJ D CD w m r- m r*— 33 L, ^ - O CD T| M CO 3)oz (D ;i; r^' ^ mSS§5|!! “ s ISI i§gP? I m 158-d 33 i 2T-“>oi - 9 I CO CO % i* ♦ .■• • • A- ^ 0 N>^:l ‘1 '•g 0 a 2 ^ N ?.?Q 0 )'. *• i§| ? § • r' '■ ■!: 0 ^.ni § 0 §. • * • « t , ‘V.* *• 7‘ ?* z _______0 ___ • '% *> iiV • iI •. ••■i . I . *. . 4 j .1 •r .1 I i! il ■ i 1 -1 8- ^ r 1....... » I B<W. C CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1929 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 20. 1994 TO:A1 Seran 4099 Ilighwood Road Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances VOTE: 5 FOR 1 AGAINSTDATE OF MEETING: 05/16/94 Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: . Approval as submitted conditioned on applicant providing a suitable retaining wall/grading/drainage plan (please provide prior to Council meeting). • Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council. Monday, June 13, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. . If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Plamttng Commission. em. ^ virrARTY 245 TONKA AV-ENUE - V.ARIANCE - PUBLIC (#10) #1927 \L\RY K. MCCARTx, hearing Chair Scbroeder noted that Schroeder noted were on file with the City. Road, stated they had attempted this w’as a public hearing. ao proposed de%elopment may adversely to replat Parcels 1 and 2 ^e adequate distance from the applicant’s impact their plans. He asked it ^icCarthv responded that she is required to house and when they might build. . ^ done a good meet the setback requirements for applicant has requested approval 'Se°i otr c^^^rp^n: bl^t :r bn. -o. .. b^n dr... Chair Schroeder stated he felt Commission ;“mb°ers“noter‘’bit onCny renews forntnl’ plans ari not drafted because appheants are only seeking direction from the Citv*. It was moved by Rowlette. ^a^^ To^a Avenue because this "m helprs:^"*^ s=nrne&d the lot is very shallour and to allow fo; preservarion of extst.ne mature trees. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#U) #1928 SUZANNE K. WACKER, 1115 BROIVN ROAD SOITTH • RENEWAL ' V.ARLANCE • PUBLIC HEARING Chair schroeder noted 1^f:::e‘:.^h';'“ were on file with the City. Mabus.h f-etbacks previous review the shed in the rear yar w removal She noted that the and with the current proposal the new o'™",? ^{l vtructurt woe' i encroach rSrt -o ^h?sueTset‘bXrfI aai7schr«der noted .bis was a public heanng, but no one wisued to speak. “ ^nc:°::i1anntK. w“c"’'l U5 Bt::n raTsrtrsub|:'’cr "be shed in the rear yard prior to final inspection. Ayes 6, nays u. (#12) #1929 ALONZO B. SERAN, III, 4099 HIGHWOOD RO.\D - VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING Gaffron reviewed the staff report and the was present and hardcover variances, and discussed the nropertv from adjacent stated that there is a significant amount of runoff P'/jsome tiling and properties located upstream, but he felt that he could manage by ^ nnOVO planning COMMISSION MEETINGor the T» 4NI III 4099 HIGHWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES • i*l9^9 ALONZO B. SER^N, UL 4099 ’ S^HEARING (CONTINUED) directing of the water flow. Lindquist inquired if the room'f^the mawt' responded that he had designed ^■olan stated he felt that the and Basswood trees which enst “ ^ lake'bore should be looked at by the Cit- topography between the house ^ '„e commented that the City does not Engineer because it ^ ,[,5 0.75 ’ setback area, normally allow any grading cvith It was moved by Nolan. «™“ded by of the variances for Alonzo B. Seran. f '‘“f j=, „ted drainage plan. Ayes b. nays . Ctit ^atersl'tS'havfprefc to have discussed some hardcover remova 1 the 0-75 ’ setback area. ... „ c.ncT tee RROWTM ROAD SOUTH • VARIANCES •(#13) #1930 MARGARET B. COST, 3a5 BROSVIN k PUBLIC hearing Chair Schroeder noted .hat the Cen.Bcate ^ n on file wa.h .he City. Mabusth ‘^rwha^was the erade of the driveway Engler, the architect, were present. .NoUn inquirea and Mr. Engler responded that it was 9 c. ^ Chair Schroeder noted .ha. this w^ a ^“™f,3,td"hey w«rcl“ t 'house .0 meet the <=' “ concerned about the preservation of ^ house and the proposed septic site which provide the only screenmg bew smaller septic system. ::^rure. Mr. Kearney the County Depai^en. They were also concerned about the ^nveway an existing entrance closed off of Transportation had ‘ “ wod^ the applicant .0 and a shared entrance created. He std« ‘h . preserve some of the trees, retain as much of the existing circle as possible and pres .« « ____ for be Kearney s couia woik 8 TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Membeis Ron Moorse. City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Mav 13, 1994 SUBJECT: tf\919 A1 Seran. 4099 Highwood Road - Variances - Public Hearing Application: Request for lot area/lot width, hardcover, lot coverage, and side setback variances to allow replacement of e.xisting residence structure. Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B): Required lot area in LR-IB zone is 43,560 s.f., required lot width is 140’. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B): Required side setback is 10’. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot coverage limited to 15'Z of lot area. Section 10.22. Subd. 2/10.56, Subd. 16(L): Limit of 25% hardcover in 75-250’ zone. Pertinent Facts Applicant proposes to remove the exiscing house and deck, and construct a slightly smaller footprint house and deck in the same location. The following variances are required: Allowed or Existing Reauired Proposed Area 10,250 s.f. ±43,560 s.f.10,250 s.f. Width 50’140’50’ Lot Coverage 19.3%15%18.4% E.Side Setback 5.4’10’5.8 ’ (Fireplace) Hardcover: 3.8’±8.5 ’4.7’± 0-75'1.2%0%1.2% 75-250'51.0%25%49.3% Variance 33,310(76%) 90’ (64%) 3.4% 4.2’ 3.8’ (No Change) 24.3% Zoning File #1929 May 13, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Hardship Statement C - Photos D - Plat Map E - Property Owners List F • Neighbor Acknowledgments G - Survey (Existing) H - Surv'ey (Proposed Site Plan) I - Hardcover Calculations and Map J - Proposed Building Plans K - Proposed Building Elevation L - Building Height Review M - Lot Coverage Review N - Site Cross Sc .lion by Applicant Additional infomiation • Tht construction meets the average setback based on the location of the two adja • residences. • No 0-75’ grading is necessary to accommodate this walkout if the building as designed is set at an elevation of approximately 943.0 (to be confirmed). • No building height variance is necessary if the building as designed has basement floor set at 943.0 (see Exhibit L). The cross sectional grading plans indicate this will be considered as a two story structure meeting the 30’ height limitation as measured from pre-existing grades. • Applicant has been advised to provide detailed retaimng wall, drainap and grading plans to confirm there will be no impact on neighboring properties. Discussion This 50’, 1/4 acre lot is typical of the Highwood neighborhood, although obviously quite substandard for the LR-IB 1 acre zoning district. No vacant adjacent property is available to make the lot larger. A residence has existed on the property for many decades. • Side Setback Variance Applicant intends to remove the existing two story frame house and replace it with a new residence of two full stories plus a lower level walkout. His intent ts to place the ho Zoning File #1929 May Ts, 1994 Page 3 virtually the same location, no nearer the lake and still averaging about 6’ from the east side lot line while maintaining 17’+ from the west lot line. The City would generally require that in these circumstances the new house be constructed with conforming setbacks. Applicant s reasons for the variance request include tree preser\'ation as well as maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Please review the applicant ’s hardship statement, E.xhibit B. • Lot Coverage/Hardcover Variances Lot coverase is proposed to reduce from existing 19.3% to 18.4%, where 15% is normally allowed. There is only a retaining wall in the 0-75 ’ zone, and in the 75-250 ’ zone hardcover will slightly decrease from 51 % to 49.3%. Absent a complete retaining wall plan for the new construction, it is possible that this may creep back up towards 50.0%. Given the topography of the site and the proximity of Highwood Road to the existing garage and gravel parking area, there does not appear to be any obvious e.xcess hardcoser which could be removed. Fortunately, the 0-75 ’ zone has almost no existing hardcover. • Average Setback is Conforming Although the survey suggests the existing deck extends further lakeward than the neighboring houses, the survey doesn^t show the upper level deck on the house to the east, and incorrectly shows the south wall of the westerly house as being funher north than it really is. That house lines up with the south edge of applicant ’s existing deck. No average setback variance is required. • Building Height Will Conform Staff has reviewed the building height in relation to pre-existing grades as required by the height ordinance and finds that the proposed struemre just means the 30 ’ limit if set at elevation 943.0. However, if final grading plan shows that the house must be set even 1’ higher to avoid 0-75 ’ grading io get drainage from the walkout level, then applicant would have to lower his 9 ceilings to avoid a height variance. • Grading and Drainage . j As of this writing, applicant has been asked to provide a detailed topographic grading and drainage plan showing the location and namre of retaining walls and grade changes necessary to accommodate the house. The house will in fact have to be set somewhat higher than applicant had initially intended in order to avoid 0-75 ’ grading, therefore the grading and drainage plan that shows how- impacts on neighboring properties will be eliminated is necessary before a building permit can be issued. However, staff is fairly confident that grading and drainage conce-Os can be worked out, as drainage will have to continue essentially in the amounts and directions it currently flows. Zoning File #1929 May 13, 1994 Page 4 Applicant has been advised that he should be prepared to justify his reasons for the side setback variance request. Staff Recommendation There is little that can be done regarding lot area and width variances. Lot coverage and hardcover can be decreased only by removing existing necessary driveway and parking areas or making the proposed deck and house footprint much smaller than the existing strucnires. Planning Commission must determine whether sufficient hardship and justification exists for the side setback variance. Any recommendation for approval should state the hardships, and should be conditioned on applicant providing suitable retaining wall/grading/drainage plan for staff review and approval (could be required for review and approval by staff prior to Council review of the application). Options for Actions 5. /1. Approval with conditions noted above. — yCX.V' 2. Partial approval. 3. Tabling for more information. 4. Denial (state reasons). K r Other. I. . ,.r. CITY OF ORONO - VARLXNCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional vari*jf ^ ^ Vr^ri.'ince Fee SlOO.OO ^ yo *56 ^ 1rrrv -r r-vr^jn C A I I v» WM V *U* ^ FiS'Aiv'^ '*■ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming strucoires S200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) hn •^nc. j I *-•» » AC4- a w* w* V'*;. V w %.♦ A IAA.M Zut w TDT—T • ft-' • V • - I » f i’w*vv:.f.v'v vmiinny^j\ IV rvsv ' rr'ic »Tw^VA.V»^V WVV'A nVA I ».•? / ■.• .* PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address hhi4 kWwAwww i % r' / t ^ - - ---------------------—-------—' ' ■ M — — Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) C~7^H'72-"^__^4*4.—A iv-fpvlfcj AVfcWA*W***w**-*'^-- --------------- V- ^ . — ------■—=—■ '■ ---------; *--------- ' ~ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey, o.a/ Date Property Acquired *4 hfr^H V____________________________(monih/year) I (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present^SiTm property: jL residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:_____a ^ <— APPLICANT. ^ ^ Name /rLePt^i^C' J Address: <4o^^/ ^*^y- Phone (home) ^7A.-i-/7e> Phone(work) ■g'5'7- ^ZSb______ yi/i^tyA/ /? Zip: OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name_____ Phone(home) Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQLTST Estimated Construction Cost $ ----------- Describe request in detail: ^g»if eje tz ^ />*V A (attach additional sheets if necessary) 4>x/yfvfc^ VARIANCES REQUIRED ^ Lot Area y. Lot Width ^ Ha: dcover Lot Coverage X Setback:Front Other (specify) ^Side gTK^ST" Pear Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERIT CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property condiuons preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: /f7Mx/rvy? 1------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary’) % 1 4m . 3 4 required submittals All of the follnwing infonpation must be submitted bv the application 4gadline.date in for vour application to be consid ered complete; Completed Application Form “^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603. Govt Center, 348-3271). ✓'Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). “P CeniHcate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one '1) copy .x 11" for li'^^opoeraphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'./i" x 11" for reproduction t/Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'A x 11 ). r/List of the legal names (include marital stams) of all persons with an interest m the propertv. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). i/ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember tot mS. anniicatinn is not com plete if the above information np< hwn igtliitltd, map'plte^ herebj^ag^^ provide all infoimation required or Admitotrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered •’>’ and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Applicant’s Signature Date i//zt!si- Date iJ III hereby tckl^edges and agrees to this application and further entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes ofJnyestigatio^and^ificanpiLnf this request. Owner’s Signamn Applicant must have all submittals into M offices 25 days before Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of Jf^h rnonm^ Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the P anning o Md CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meetmg. pl<^ m^e arra^^enB m have rauthorized'ag^ anend in your place and to advise the BuUdmg & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. #1 929JL. A-) 'Ti‘^ /^ak/z O DiA^ 7> ^X^t/>477^/t/ 7>» <wv. ^ « <1^/' ^v ^*- r /2^ z40fy\ _ _ _ _ AMy'e: . jr ^0/^"/jPz77 CAf^ V^ ^*^^5" r<5.pr aJ£a^ ^ p^,r> ^CiPr ^z^C'^7^ f3^/o , ^ '^•sre^ 7W<S P‘ /^«W D) TrfAo 7>tt^ ^Af^ Tz(^Bt X (}^/sJ t,uc^ Th^ l/'^^OiTT^ 7//'t/^ f^Att}z,fi*/4r Z^CAi^C <^Az /z A TIZA/.T7 -ja p^ziAC., P^*TH y>»^ Z^z ^^/T^c^aJ X ^A»>\/ y4c.% c t^/hr^ez^ P]3 /V^<^ ^T3^}0^cZrtyA>’^ pt^Cm-H #>✓/*- ^A'T^ZtCZ^ f'rt^ PpAzfUl^"^ ^ 7>iz S W. t-w •«« I T<{? T^ 90\^^ U<*^S- tfi^^l^ ✓ft'*-'_ tcuTH /f-^^ J^<^r Trfz. 7"«h/<s» ^y/iui^y^^s, ^ _ /•s 2-t'.*S’' ^.Oe~ £>^ 26> ' S£,7^ /^y^t/T~~ 7.3' 7^^ ff^lfO^ J “f^i^ /^^w ^ '7, C /fr Cyfyytg UrVf^ Ti^fC-^n /f'tr 3 «9 vl^ *C' 2T rAy/i^y^ T7> €/fy^^ T~L^o ^ TTX^fis' 3c7^h/ A^l^ fl- //VZ -^Z/zf ^ 4'^3*'/t<5>3 /Zg; u^> ^5^7>/ii4-»5 « 5 r> Wk.' ^1^7/i TTt^CI^ f^ic. ^ P/^^tyn^^ £V7>u^ P^yy/^-^yyy/ ^ ^ •5>f^e/*^ Pt t ^4•^i^O Z>^cX&€. <//t^ TTfS. /yJ ^ Of^T T>t/S fv? c) /f4</.^(r 7?*E <!^£3r «/'/5 ’£ ^ P^^i/iyOS- ^ f^eTTi^y^ i/t^^ “J-cvt. yio>^cr cyJ yj^M-xhi 5/^s* ///^/y ^ 'I • ■'S iV', ;T:-; <-•■■‘'V K'• • ••: //CW'^at? *• . ”• J 4 f 4 \xt r V V- ; ■?r' \ ■ %. r . ■'V/’i.'K ^7 - V *-'• /• I / 4 *^v3c; V p«"-: Wtiir 5. »' »Iff '2 •=-y^/ •- \ , S4. ' ... r-^-^: r ' V —•• • ^ ' -'.• W '>r X \ ' V 1 V s\ i ^ .— f • -- vV. 0 6osm . \rce 724.25 RES 0 mJN DATE M/15/94BATCH DIEPROP AOOR (MCR NANE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNER HAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR t . PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR . i ‘.PROP ADDR • OHNER NAME TAXPAYER ^ NAHE/ADDR /. • . .* » • t •*. I A ; / HEItCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INEORHATIQN SYSTEM PROPERTY OmERS LISTSB 07-117-25 44 0009 04075 HIQNHOOO RO R S PROCHNOH A S B PROCHNON ROBERT S A SARAH B PROCHNON 4075 HXGHHuOO RD HOUND HN 55344 SB 07-117-23 44 0012 04099 HIGHHOOO RO OLLXS L NELSON ETAL ALONZO B SERAN III 4099 HX6HH000 RO HOUND MN 55344 3B 07-117-23 44 0015 04109 HXGHNOOD RO GEORGE N APPLEBAUH GEORGE APPLEBAUH 4109 HXGHNOOD RO ^ HOUND HN 55344 3B 07-117-25 44 0055 04106 HXGHNOOD RD DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER 410B HXGHNOOD ROAD HOUND HN 55344 36 07-117-23 44 0034 0005B ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO BRUCE J HOLUMDY BRUCE J HOLUHBY 4114 HXGHNOOD RO HOUND HN 55344 I 56 07-11T-25 ♦♦ 0010 (M07f MI6HH000 RO JOHN T SA»«ORN ETAL J T SANBORN 4077 HX6HNOOO RO HOUNO 104 5S3A4 56 07«117-25 44 0015 04101 HI6HN00D RO EVA THEOBALD EVA A niEOBALO 4101 HXCHHOOO ROAO HOUND HN 55564 56 07-117-25 44 0051 04152 HX6HN000 RO SCOTT 0 A CATHERINE ANOERSON SCOTT e A CATHERINE ANOERSON 4152 HIGHHOOO ROAO HOUNO m 55564 56 07-117-25 44 0«54 04104 HIGHHOOO RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HX6HM000 RO HOUND IM 55564 36 07-117-25 44 0057 00056 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO HARREN KLXRSTEXN JANES A LXSBETH CLEARY 4109 NO SHORE OR HOUND m 55^64 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 4756 07-117-25 44 001104091 HX6NH000 RO F L JOHNSON A 0 L FOSS FREDERIC JOHNSON 4091 HIGHHOOO RO HOIM) m 55564 56 07-1X7-25 44 0014 04105 HXGHNOOD RO CHARLES E DA HART HXLLXAH G BRXCKLEY 4105 HXGHHOOO HOUNP Ml 55564 56 07-117-25 44 0052 04116 HXGHHOOO RO BRUCE J HOLUHBY PHIL OTTO 4140 HXGHHOOO RO HOUNO HN 55564 1'. 56 07-117-25 44 0055 04104 NXGHNOOD RO GIB SAUER GLEN i BEVERLY SAUER 4104 NX6NN000 RO HOUND MN 55344 *i J't • . . I I.. r-1• ; .>7 . ■ •• . • ■ »■ ■ •: 'v* • .■"s'.'’- V .. ' I i' rv'rl't ’ • H) -r •. V • •• * •' TOTAL BATCH 012 00014 » ' A • .2 y V 4 t L' f jLvyy^C ■r /f • *,'1 • »r -. • V . Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form [print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed irtprovement or proposed use of the prope^ located ^(T^-Vy /y-g-K^: r:/- also referred to as Land Use .Application Vo. / , ,ve> understand that h, e« Z S^uncil tot7(U'am''(«r^vare of the improvement plans and that the proposed ne.ghbor's project or use requires Council approval, J -,j?/ - 9^ Date i- Zi _ Date ***♦•*•>• ■***•*•**•••' ,*#♦*♦**»** I (we) Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form m . . [pi(mt name(s)] Council tSt I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed nei, project or use requires Council approval. ' Propenv' Owner ^/zu> Property Owner Dr Jte X 5*« * * Coro /•I A<L /ice ‘’ /f*'V»v f 2(,r_ iS^ 1i . Z» -VcA' /IT • •* ..v^* '\_j111 >» * Sherrty cei-f//j r^tf /> ^ fruf QnJ Corrc*/ rc/rete>^iiftn\ 0 5<4'’*^*Y lr4^ ///^/<«/<w</ It Me M/nnf^OR/f^, /ec4//gn */* pr^>are€f 60 0X. ^R'** ^ cUfp / / j Sart/ey*r Tatyjt t/ /”f tr ClfiTlf/CflT£ OF^ Sa/jV^r t i L- • Ptntht fut*^ O Dtntfti S€^ p.k. nait o*~ *nJ Fluf - RLS A>*. nut. N»kt San. l^/'irAcre ; fO 3tr/bn Cr. Ahrens A4iUU. **J. aof,’/ //.. />V/ Bjrf ^f)rens f ’ ^utif >5/» //JgA Tb/neJ', Rf*f SS-Z/S- of:/o/ /jZ Z/tjZuootJ Zjif(e Plinn* f //tAntfim Ct. y/nnfs»^». /cv-fl/onzo Seran ^099 'w . /♦/W, WV SSS&^ SAse^ / e£/ }.3 OEmiL ~!%0 V.\\ n.2 ^ ^^(f-vJ 7L '^ /./ Oc cK !•« t \ t iron m Pen^f^ Tr^ri Q Den»/e^ SC'^ P,i(. naii or- ''^i''/PeS»r ohJ p/uy ~ ^Ls Aia. herc^^ cv^T/^ '/Aa/ frue Ond Corrccp rc^reie>^iaf/<n\ o-f Q Ifon/i<dary it l^Me /^/>7/)tf'^^^/ (^rld /oe^//ffn d/ Sc^/M'n^s , prey>ared Sy mt and dn/ Ct ^4^ Pc^'ifereti l^nii Sctri/eyar andtt^ di.f foktAis o/ A^f S/m/^ oAcmrfA/cflre oe sua ^vev NAct ^an. lytain tine r\€<iir laAerAor e r^zo' Bar/on Cr. /^hf-cn^ A^/AJAJ. Pe.^, f^o.f^K^Z. ^pr// /L /99A Bq:J oil JL_____• » 0 4^_____» hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’25-500’500-1 f VISTTNG hardcover IN ZONT A. House ^ /C y I ^ * f^/P Length X X X 3^-6 X 2(;.^ Width ’Z^____ B. Garage^LT-'L'L C. Drivewa; »rt£0 __14. 0 __& Cy4TM i^rteOx S.5 Af*aer-1 D. Sidev*’«*lk (K th X. X <9 • ^ ^ 7 g. ?2x Z • y //. 5 » E. Patio/Dcclo^ ^X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic ^o X X X 3______ . -7*3 G. Other ^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A - B X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVTR IN ZONT ru 9b t .A. House et, Length A X X X Width 1.5__ B. Garage C. Driveway^ -----------------■ e- -___ D. Sidewalk ^ X X X X ^ -?<.cy y 2,.^ y /<?x^ E. Patio/Deck^ ^ ^ <3^-- X X F. Landsc Underlai Bv Plastic 2^ X X X .73 G. Other (J? TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ONE . , \ / ^ B X. 100 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A Y_ SF. V7 iiji z9r 37>g /W. (# //9 9^9 nil 1± S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F / 3.4.5“ S.F S.F S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F UL^**.h S.F Sf S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9Z.X.9 S.F. S.F. S.F. / S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 99TI % A B A B SOUTH CDGC Of HIGHWOQD RD LOT LINE SOUTH EDGE OT HIGHVOOD RD. LOT LINE total lot area measured 75 EECT EROM 929 4 WATtR LEVEL IS bt.54 6 SO. FT.existing hardcover for lot 14 4099 HIGHWOOD ROAD St'ALE I tr«u» - 15 5 FT4/19/94 AL SERAM garage 484 SO. FT. STAIRS 96^FT driveway 922 9 SOFT. NOTE HIGHWOOD RD COMES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOT 14 THIS ACCOUNTS FOR 120 SO FT OF HARDCOVER SHED 119 SOFT FIREPLACE 17 SO. FT. 3 FT DIA OAK (D OLD HOUSE 1069 5 SO FT. retaining wall M6 SO FT. (is GARDEN 76 4 SO. FT^'^ DECK i STAIRS 332 5 son SIDEWALK 76 6 SO. FT. .^3 FT. DIA DAK PROPOSED HARDCOVER FOR NEW HOME 75 Ff. FREW** ' 9e94 MSL 2//^75= ^ r-3 fZQPr ^€i7~' i^T" >3'^«W/>/^ /f5;€*^3-7^-^/ .?-- /2 7. / i^OT' \ S.^t ^ /t7,1 i c • r < , ^|73r^' Q ^T /•z-7, /^r* ■i ?.j i-o • ■ ^1«>.4£. MOD PvOOM/ LAUMDR^ Room 7' z^w KeFiG rn:i<c4t* o o u:irr-H£H \4® >c <4® V ^__2LS?-I i" C)A.Px D1HIM6 ROOM lo^ K >'Z-" ( - LiViKJG * Room id X 3d p£<sv<. 4'-o » J ' . • 1 1 G*-o 1 io‘- o 11 , 1 o'- o ---------—------------ /-1 /I ^ 1 ^D-O 1----- f ^ ■7~%(c C£Lf^ 4 K 4 P<»*^ z X10 "rTfArep 4 X lO WTfeP 4" pumtH e>i-'=»< ■' 12." A AL SERAN ( • » r: > • 1 : ► f • f . ‘ *• t i: i ©tL A-^ ir^. L'l •) •? LiCF>kT ^ f7“ Q '> •. ‘ -4 j'_ w -W R F.. A R 6 L EVATj^ S'r 1 T~ f r' 7r •‘i r' V■"'* . J \ vi^T4. ^\V P:' feVATiosl I'-O / 1 ^ r I 9f - 61PS. KLEVATion) Ve," ^ I*-© ,. Is / 0>'V <^VJ k1&^2. Vi/ MA^.- -^?A44U<: RA\U\hJG». H Sm^cTUA^ L_ .j^/S bV. ^______... _____________ x/y, 32 /2-3 n J)pCJ^ /o 7,‘i'r _____ ..______V»_V^i, _ -----^ 0 ■ - - ■■ — - ■■' »- • - K ■■ ■ —— -*• ................................- -..........._3.8 _ ._„. „„ . 2-2^x*i^2^ . .. „ ... vsy . ......... SUi^..]0!T .. .. . /,l7.i^ ±.«, -J.%M-m , m j» m w --- ^ //<: 2 d, > ^ 2^g>a*J-r. _ ................. 8 V /‘/11 i. Ff y L-^ pt?c^ !0>^Z^Z<^D ____ ._ ..... . 3 x/4.. r i/‘i ^iVvC •2-'2-x2-2-Vs*/ .......... Q:h?^ - *_V.. ^/OS' ____ /fea/ -h!■ /&My,. « ■ ■ m- ?#•«> ^ •4«Mi W V->. eo 12' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION •7ft DATE: March 6," 4^5 ^ ITEM NO ■'7 % iS? Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1990 Robert Carlson, 710 Gander Road - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Resolution Zoning District: RR-IB Area of property = 2 acres Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.12 - Request to vacate utility easement Application Applicant has petitioned for the vacation of a 35’ wide drainage and utility easement dedicated on the plat of Foxwood Second Addition. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has released and terminated any interest in the original sewer easement granted to the MWCC in April of 1975. The Release and Termination of Sanitary Sewer Easement, Exhibit E, has been filed by the Fredrikson and Byron law firm against the Chain of Title of the property. List of Exhibits A - Application B C D E F G Property Owners’ List Plat Map MWCC Easement Release and Termination of Sanitary Sewer Easement Plat of Foxwood Second Addition Staff Sketch of Easements to Remain Once Vacation is Completed Brief Review of Application The applicant has filed a petition seeking the vacation of a 35’ wide drainage and utility easement dedicated in the plat of Foxwood Second Addition (approved in December of 1989). The surveyor for the subdivision advised applicant that the City Attorney’s office for Orono required that the MWCC easement be shown on the plat as a drainage and utility easement. In reviewing the subdivision file, there is no reference as to the existence of the easement nor is there a record of any written discussion noting the existence of that easement. Approval of Foxwood Second Addition was not conditioned on the easement being shown on the final plat. If the Orono staff was aware of the easement, it would not have been designated as a drainage and utility easement but rather as a utility easement with a document number of the easement recorded on the plat. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 March 6, 1995 <1^1990 Robert Carlson, 710 Gander Road Review Exhibits D and E, the MWCC has released all interest in the easement. The Release Agreement has been filed by the Fredrikson and Byron law firm against the Chain of Title of the property. There is no public interest served by the existence of the easement. Staff recommends that the 35 ’ drainage and utility easement be vacated and that easements be retained as shown on the staff sketch. Exhibit G. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposed vacation subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant to execute drainage and utility easements to ensure 10’ wide easement exists at the north and south lot lines of Lot 2, Block I, Foxwood Second Addition. Execution of a drainage easement to be taken over the portion of the wetland located within the area of the vacated 35 ’ utility easement. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF THE PLAT OF FOXWOOD SECONT ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1990 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 1994, Robert W. Carlson filed a i^tition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a 35’ drainage and utility easement originally dedicated in the plat of Foxwood Second Addition and legally described as follows: a 35* drainage and utility easement as shown on Lot 2, Block 1, Foxwood Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, public hearings were held before the City’s Planning Commission on January 17, 1995 and February 22, 1995, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an oppormnity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. 2. Neither the City nor the MWCC intends to develop a municipal sewer line within the 35’ easement. Location of the easement within the proposed building envelope of the undeveloped lot will present problems with the future residential development of the site. 3. The drainage and utility easement as it exists serves no public purposes. Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Robert W. Carlson is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and that the drainage and utility easement legally described above is hereby vacated. Granting of the petition is subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant to grant a drainage and utility easement to ensure 10 ’ wide continuous easement exists at the north and south lot lines of Lot 2, Block 1, Fo.xwood Second Addition. 2. Granting of a drainage easement to be taken over the portion of the designated wetland located within the area of the 35 ’ drainage and utility easement to be vacated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on March 13, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 2 of 2 n Out It*- CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND US hr $ f PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address "7/0 ’] C r APPLICANT Name _________j— Address >^C —>^IS:± •iyc^ Ca/ 0>*"7^C^ Phone (home) ^ Citv __ Phone (work) 3^ 4^^ Zip ^rys^4 Name ______^------- Address '■i CrV >4v^ S. -------- C*t.+M City MpL^y Zip_£rW£i p^^Pr,^g;Tv Acquired //-^ >/ **</ I (do) (^ n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land (momh/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ' $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commerciaiyindustrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration -------- Grading and filling - designated weUand or floodplam Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore 11 , i i.V “ \Ji\unU’kiil II VI > r lI't"iLu ^ I n‘ M* II 1 1 w'w'Vfc. */WV'V' ,,i rski Vl Ti I u l?c- w' * i " X I V.* •CsiElH jsi:LEiP{^ih^Nh, >'0l 1‘j01 .yvl i. PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , r x _____$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation-^0 ^ \J • \J V< A* /-75‘5^<^r75T0(r^Easement Vacation _____^^5:00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PLTD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals ___Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District VS> Present Use of Propert>' ^ Residential Other (specify). •» * ^ required submittals 1, • Completed Application Form. 0 Describe request in detail. . . .. ^ ——Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you can obtain this list from i. Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). 4 V-' . Plat Map. — ' cenif’cate of Survey (signed by^a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey " information. . , ^ ^ •• j ^ Attach le«^al description to application if not mcluded on required survey. 7*. “Tiir Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours).#, land alterations mvolve changes in elevation (grades). . • .t,.. Q •'1 List of the legal names (include marital sams) of all persons with an mterest m the -------- nropertv Hiis would include name<s) of.applicant(s)- if.not cutient owner(s). 9' o'c> Consmlction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).. 10. As an addendum to this application; please anach a separate Itst of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ SS u ” ■SrSSLXFS'STSSc'SSS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Pka« remember that your application is not complete if the above informauon has not been mcluded. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Appliration is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:---------------------------------------------- and/or unusual expenses incurred iiuev)ew of this^phtmuon, and cemties mat supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Owner’s signamre Date please make aLigemems to have an authorized agent attend tn your plane and advise of this change prior to the meeting. , r:**T '■' • ■.''.'RUN DATE XZ/Z2/9A■-U. ’• ' • .BATCH 50X *‘ i; D ; PROP AOOR rVTOItCR NAHC TAXPAYER . i NAME/ADOR •A j 3.n- j PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE I TAXPAYER : NAHE/AOOR V . f/ r ' *0 \ j»>. • .* ) 1 , PROP AOOR ! ONNER NAHC r TAXPAYER : . NAHE/AOOR ^ * •' ^ < .. ’ • i V U^» »- • • PROP AOOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR V<^V f •PROP AOOR I ^ ONNER NAHEVw***, TAXPAYER ! NAHE/AOOR \ . * *• • i; i. *•*4 V- 1. <• f ! 58 OA-117-E5 AS OOOS 02675 FOX ST P J SLOCUH SEE 6ILL1GAN PETER SLOCUH A ERXN GILLIGAN 2675 FOX ST KAYZATA HN 55391 58 04-117-23 43 0015 02750 RAINEY RO HAIUC G FOX A HARY-STUART FOX HARK G FOX 2730 RAINEY RO NAYZATA HN 55391 36 04-117-23 43 0019 00038 AODRESS UNASSIGNEO RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON 138 GROVELANO TER HPLS HN 55403 38 04-117-23 43 0022 00038 AODRESS UNASSIGNEO DENNIS F KUHLIN DENNIS F KUHLIN PO BOX 855 NAYZATA HN 55391 38 04-117-23 44 0005 00710 GANDER RO R R H A CO ROBERT A ANGELLA CARLSON 235 LAKEVIEH AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 HEM4EP1N COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTCH’ PROPERTY ONNERS LIST38 04-117-23 43 000902625 FOX ST DAE PETERSON DAVID E PETERSON 2625 FOX STREET NAYZATA HN 55391 •; . 1 •?. *11. •V i 38 04-117-23 43 0016 02690 RAINEY RO H N SHITH A C 0 SHITH H N SHITH A C 0 SHITH 2690 RAINEY RO NAYZATA HN 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0020 00650 GANDER RO J H S EQUITIES INC J H S EQUITIES INC 4806 PARK GLEN RO HPLS HN 55416 38 04-117-23 44 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO P E ECKERLINE/H A ECKERLINE PETER E ECKERLINE 2555 FOX ST ORONO HN 55391 %• TOTAL BATCH 501 00013 REPORT NO. PX435401 PAGE 2 • 9 1- .38 04-117-23 43 0013 02685 RAINEY RO R S A S S VICKERHAN R SCOTT VICKERHAN SUSAN S VICKERHAN 2685 RAINEY RO NAYZATA HN 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0018 00048 ' ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON 138 GROVELANO TER HPLS HN 55403 38 04-117-23 43 0021 00730 GANDER RO C K ROOSEVELT/V 0 ROOSEVELT C K ROOSEVELT/V 0 ROOSEVELT 2665 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55391 38 04-117-23 44 0004 02601 RAINEY RO RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON 138 mOVELANO TER HPLS HN 55403 • ,, * S T ■ m ‘J*-* / vi-W*.‘V*^' > k ' « « * V • ' • r • 1' /u •A‘- it .% 'V>U * r . • * ’ > 4« • • • m • : ’-i: ■ ...l i-'-yn: M'". r '.V« '■■j-S •» « J. J • [ y \ " . • ? 'J* u • . / • ;■ :; v--1*”*It •. •» % LD* 1/ V 15 i « w kOt ?i « « m 16 It 4 lOT » ■ It • ft** 1 • WI 47|tt ^" Ntfl'lft V6 8T fAX/ ifc 5 xi.siCAS Mrx'J PftSKiT 73 H ^dOOS o4-in-i^‘‘^3 i>7 H m ish./l SW57'57'C 3 (4) lot (I •.-5 1138B« kr 4 ra 1106036 r-1 AhvJ._____. * •7'", .•• ,*»nj **. ir-1 ‘ n .^n«l !i • !•. K*i—*: •*, *^u^- inc* wife, oC th^ Ccjnt'- *l«'nnr:'ir .in! »*:r o'* , i>f the first f'sr*^. And th#* ••t—pn^'»M7^* WAr*:*^ ^ >V.'»Trr-, ^orr^rlv the *VtroonUtan 5<»wor Po/^rf\ ^ •jl^* instituted ncrn^ ' of the Jtetropol 11 \n Couiicil created .yn** ^^roanized unrsuant to ••innesofj Laws Chapter partv n?‘ rn** second p^r^; -^ITV^SSITH, That the said, partie- »• the ^ir*«t part. ii‘ consi oration of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration to then in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. do hereby Grant, Bargain. Sell. Convey and Warrant to said party of the second part, the easements situate in Permepin County, Minnesota, described as follows, to-wltt A 35 foot perpetual essenent and a 100 foot temporary constractioo easement for sanitary sewer purposes over, under end metOBm the following described propertyi ^ Lot 11, Auditors Subdivision Mo. 129, according to the records ^ on file end of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, « Hennepin County, Miimesots. raid perpetual easement being 17,5 feet on each side of the following described line, emd said temporary const ruction eeeesMit being SO.O feet on each side of said following described line. Said line is described ss foliowst Ccnnencing at the Northeast comer of the Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 117, Range 23i thence south on an assumed bearinq of South 0 degrees, 17 minutss, 5S seconds Bast along the East line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 40B.64 foetr thence South S7 degrees, 10 minutes, OS seconds West 406.43 feeti thence South S3 degrees, 02 minutes, IS seconds West 643.22 feetr thence Sooth 2 degrees, SO minutes, 37 seconds Bast 60 3.21 feeti thenee North tf degrees, 14 minutes, OC seconds Vest 91.70 festi thenos South 25 degrees, S3 minutes, 20 seconds Vest 230.00 fssti thence continue Routh 25 degrees, S3 adnutes, 20 seconds West 123.44 feeti thence South 13 degrees, 44 sdnutes, 30 seconds West 330,C4 feeti thence South 7 degrees, 16 i^nutes* 15 seconds Bast 30S.2I feet and there torainating. Said temporary construction easement axolres December 31, 1976. Tbas ceoveyanoe is axampt froi State Dead Tax pursuant to MSA 217.22 Doc. No. 1138926 Filed 5-T-75 X . D ‘A v' -.v* • . r • ^- ii- / t •• 1138S0Sv^j?rRTor, *u? i,.'irtioK of rho 'imr part ^ovr» 3rt their \.inds trie dev and vfar first ahov#* written. !n I'Qj K LI t LJt Donnin T. KumTn Barbara B.Kumlln ST\7r '>•“ MIMTirSOTA J )C01.-.TY or iirririrpir: j / ■ »On this ic dav of > 1?75, before ->c* a t:otJury Public, within cind for said County, personally appeared Dennis f. Kuril in and Barbara B. K*jr lln, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and %#ho executed the foregoing 1 nitnjnrnt and acknowledged that tliey executed the sane as their free act atwi deed. iUJ e. THIS I?4STRUMrNT WAS DRAFTED BY Robert A. HiUBtron 1710 Soo Line Bldg. Minneapolis, .Minnesota S5402 M. iftS D %,s..•.r?'• t.A.. . a V-.vV-*-' ’■■:£4»r■ '7< 2 V. ^m •fit--r-. ^ . ■C'ww^.•» eTr. ^ ^ . a C ,’h ;;:• >,v -V J ^ '• KC.V*.-’' V4 "• * ' ' ” r-. • ••■•:... • *• 1>TJ| i:r 1/u ^ r ^1- . ' ' V•r tV. V \- - it, i-.' ! V /> o *• •• - r -V •*-•*.* . » r- ^ . « ' . : I S^ii> 'V-T' . ..a A ^ « W » I I J .4 \ . •♦. r,* FW NO. 612229^136 P.C2 „„ot. Statutes I s*"“„i"ssci'«s» “•'sinis. K li. £51«" ”■” “•ase»«nt was ecquirta b? i *.4 AW of m 1 I i \ "rr-; ' *.^ V ^7,9 tMt ®» •{i ^ flaiA ••rpatMl •••yKiJ^SSortiy -nu-sssi: s^^*E*bT®s.SsSfis- anrfs *•** *«»?.•*( • • li,?rwt >»6.« *:;*»,!5rJSJi! ........ “■“•■ ™'7 "1.’...». j'aN- 4-S5 WED 9^29 KWS ENG/CONST FAX NO.r • IH_W1THES3 agr««nent to hm duly oxoeutod thl» APPROVED AS TO FORK: am unr)Motropoiltan council# a public corporation and political aubdiviaion of th® State# , succes*or to^ha K®tro]^ltan Waata control Conaiaoion T^« ChaS^ Its general **awaa®r. ^atavttfr StrYigM - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) aa. COUNTY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^^aattadEi' lUbllc wlthjj: and/or aaid County, # 192^#b«fora M aonaliy aopaarad. .]> V y^eiaatfifivaiv nanad In th# foregoing lnatrum®nt, and that aai?Motropolitan Council, a public corporation and political aubdiviaion of the Stata, suoeeaaor .. iio»Md Council. ANNE MAJETiCH notary PU«UC • M.NNIKTA DAKOTA COUNTY r tenniwat fc«irH fia tl ifM Jeanne K. Matrosa, License No. 60615 Metropolitan Council/Wastowater services - (612) 229-2108 230 East Fifth Street Hears Park Centre \ St. Paul, MN 55105 D1138926.con /p , , ^ ^ /I ••'I' FEET UMENT ________zir___________ fse</ upon on Qssomec/ (> \ N '' } f. I *. c • m ( - ^ ' / C'l V- V w /' I''\ ' ''V^. o 2 o: VX)r-‘o ^I ^ / \ ,- ^hvs'js'w C -.- o r - ,v -r O » I \ L. i. I 300.00 .. •f® NO NO I COUNTY, MINNESOTA Minnesota Laws of 1969, this plat has been approved this day of . 19 fH }; . I: . UMEt 7Sod I CO Min .^1 . i ! h i. UMENT is^<i i^pon Qri QGHjmcc^ (Ja^vm • T , QndodWmno lolt \' Se/iT^ lo oofised tn,PiidtJi and Qd}ointna block, imcs • unless ofherwkt MdicoAsd on tUc fitih > acv H =fe Dn ii.. '5 l_^ «*. n»rJcv:W.Ns s I COUNIY. MINNESOTA Minnesota Laws of 1969, this plat has been approved this day of REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION . % DATE: March 9, 1995 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1992 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 13.8 acres. Please refer to enclosed staff memo dated 2/9/95 for a listing of the pertinent ordinances that remain unchanged. Review of Amended Plan per Planning Commission Recommendation Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. 0-75’ setback area = 110,243 s.f. (20,591 s.f. of public road area has been excluded from setback area as area cannot be credited as buildable area per Section 10.02, Definition 34 - Lot area. The area of a lot in a horizontal plane bounded by the loi lines, but not including any area occupied by . . . area which has been dedicated as public right-of-way). Existing = 966.5 s.f. or 0.80% Proposed = 1,098 s.f. or 0.90%’“ *“160 s.f. of a paved 4 ’ walkway to lakeside deck at southeast comer of property and 30 s.f. of an existing retaining wall to be restored and not included in original hardcover facts. 75-250’ setback area = 317,893 s.f. Existing = 49,923 s.f. or 15.7% Proposed = 55,163 s.f. or 17.35% Increase results with 5,240 s.f. of new service drive hardcover originally proposed as a grass drive. Additional Exhibits N - Adjusted hardcover inventory for 0-75’ setback area O - Amended site plan P - Crosby Letter 3/7/95 Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 March 9. 1995 Zoning File #1992 Brief Review of Application Please refer to the staff memo dated February 9, 1995 and the minutes of the February 22nd Planning Commission meeting for more detail and background on this review. The current application involves major structural repairs to the 59 x26 greenhouse addition at 1,534 s.f. in area. The greenhouse is part of a larger oversized accessory structure totalling 5,478 s.f. in area. The existing foundation and walls shall be retained and the upper portion of the structure to be replaced with a new aluminum and glass super structure. The existing brick foundation and walls shall be repointed and new brick veneer placed over existing masonry walls on the south side of the greenhouse structure. As noted in the factual findings of the memo of February 9th, the greenhouse is located 50’ + from the public road and 80 from the side lot line and meets all required setbacks. The accessory structure was formally recognized by the City in October of 1993, review Exhibit G, as a nonconforming structure because it exceeded the allowed 3,000 s.f. in area for an accessory strucmre. The strucnire now considered a nonconforming structure would require variance approvals anytime structural repairs were proposed. The detached accessory garage at the east lot line shall also receive major strucmral repairs consisting of new roof, new doors, replacement of wood facia and rafter details. The garage does not meet the required side setback of 15’ and will require variance approval for structural repairs. The walls running along the east and south lot line shall also be repaired or replaced. The walls located within the side yard (50’ in from the street) are 6 ’ in height and would not require approval of a variance. The entrance walls located 50’ + from street and at 6 ’ in height will also not require a variance approval. A conditional use permit and variance have also been filed to permit the reconstruction of retaining walls at the underground entrance to the greenhouse located within the 0-75’ setback area. Walls support the banks of an underground tunnel that provides the only exterior access to the lower portion of the greenhouse. The 0.10% hardcover increase in the 0-75’ setback area reflects the 30 s.f. of retaining wall not included in original calculations and a 160 s.f. of a paved path providing access to the lakeside deck/stair structure approved in 1993, refer to Exhibit J. Survey/site plan of 1993 revealed the path but hardcover facts never reflected the new hardcover proposed. The path was originally shown at 8’ width and was constructed at a 4’ width. In the original application presented to the Planning Commission, there was 250 s.f. of additional hardcover in 0-75’ for a 10’ wide access drive originally shown on your improvement plans. Exhibit J, as grassed drive with an underlying gravel bed that would not have been considered hardcover. Planmng Commission Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 4 March 9, 1995 Zoning File #1992 ___ found no acceptable hardship to allow a new curb cut on the public roadway. Applicants had acreed to oricinally install a grass drive and also have an option to relocate a connecting drive from the main access drive out of the 0-75’. Applicants have submitted an amended site plan, review Exhibit O, that shows the 10’ drive being removed and replaced with a grass lawn. In the original hardcover facts presented to the Planning Commission, hardcover in 0-75’ was shown at 16% + . This resulted with the inclusion of the 20,591 s.f. of public road area. Hardcover improvements in the 0-75’ are actually at less than 1 %. The code does not allow the area of public roads to be included in buildable lot area facts. Planning Commission members found acceptable hardships to allow the repair of the Jundt ’s retaining wall at the only e.xterior access to the greenhouse. As for the paved pathway from the lake deck and stairs, they found the path had been installed at a 4’ width which met the standard for access stairs or access ways for lakeshore lots with steeper topographies also noting that a paved path had been shown on original plans and at an 8’ width. The structural repairs to either the greenhouse addition of the oversize accessory structure and the detached three stall garage did not involve the complete replacement of the structures and involved structural/cosmetic repairs to existing portions of structure. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application as amended excluding the paved drive within the 0-75’ setback area based on the hardships noted above, subject to the following conditions: 1. Removal of the 10’ wide paved drive within the 0-75’ setback area must be removed prior to City ’s issuance of building permit for restoration of structures. Groundcover must be restored to the disturbed area no later than May 15, 1995. 2. Applicants to provide written confirmation of a date when the new septic system serving principal structure and detached caretaker residence is to be installed. The applicants’ attorney has been advised that sewering Bracketts Point would require a Comp Plan amendment. The Bracketts Point neighborhood was found to have adequate and suitable areas for septic expansion and was classified as the lowest of the defined ten hot spots as to the need for sewer. The issuance of the original building permit for the repairs to the principal structure and caretaker residence was conditioned on applicants agreeing to install a new septic system once the City had resolved the issue of potential sewering of the area. A temporary certificate of occupancy has been is ued for the principal residence and the City granted a conditional use permit for the continued use of the caretaker residence. It is imperative that a new system be installed during the next construction period for 1995. Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 4 March 9, 1995 Zoning File #1992 ______ The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Conunissions unanimous recommendation of approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. Addendum: The City is in receipt of a letter dated 3/7/95 from Thomas Crosby conarming that applicants will install septic system during construction period of 1995 if they are unable to connect to municipal sewer. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1(A) AND 2; SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(C-2) AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(E) FILE NO. 1992 WHEREAS, James R. Jundt and M. Joann Jundt (hereinafter the "applicants") are owners of the property located at 14(X) Bracketts Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Refer to Exhibit "A" attached hereto (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to allow the reconstruction of a retaining wall and a variance to Section 10.22, Section 1(A) as retaining walls are located within the 0-75’ setback area at approximately 45’ from the shoreline where no such structures are allowed; a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(C-2) as major structural repairs are proposed to a greenhouse addition of an oversized structure at 5,478 s.f. where only a 3,000 s.f. accessory structure is allowed; a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(E) as stmcniral repairs are proposed to a three stall garage in excess of 750 s.f. that is located 0 ’ from a side lot line where the code would require a 15’ side yard setback and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 for a hardcover variance in the 0-75’ setback area resulting in a 0.10% increase in hardcover where 0.80% exists and 0.90% is proposed and where none is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1992. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring two acres in area. The property consists of 13.8 acres. Page 1 of 7 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 22, 1995 and recommended ‘'approval of the conditional use permit and variances as amended based on the following unique findings and hardships; a. b. c. d. e. The property consists of 13.8 acres. The structures on the property were constructed prior to development of standards for residential construction on lakeshore properties. On-site septic testing has been completed for the property and testing has confirmed there is adequate area and suitable soils for development of on site septic systems to serve the principal structure and the caretaker residence within the oversized accessory structure. Structural repairs to the nonconforming accessory structures do not involve the complete restoration but merely partial strucmral or cosmetic repair. The retaining walls at the underground entrance to the greenhouse provide the necessary support and stability to the only exterior entrance to the lower level of the greenhouse. The paved walkway located within the 0-75 ’ setback at the east shoreline has been installed at 4 ’ meeting the required width of accessory access stairs within the 0-75 ’ setback area for lots with steep slope. The paved walkway will minimize erosion of grassed lawn resulting from the more intense use of the lake access stairs providing the only bathing and boating access to lake for this property. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow tte restoration of the retaining wall within the lakeshore protected area will not be deiiimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, wouW not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. f. g Page 2 of 7 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficuity; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER ANP CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings. the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(A) to permit the restoration of retaining walls located 45’ from the shoreline of the property and grants variances to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(C 2) and 10.03. Subdivision 9(E) to permit structural repairs to two nonconforming accessory structures and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 approves a 0.10 increase in hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area where 0.80% exists and 0.90% is proposed, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 250 s.f. of driveway paving located within the 0-75’ setback area shall be removed prior to City’s issuance of building permit for restoration of structures. Applicants are also required to maintain erosion control within disturbed area until groundcover is restored. The City is in receipt of a letter (dated March 7, 1995) from Thomas Crosby, Jr., applicants ’ attorney, confirming that applicants will install a conforming on-site septic system during the 1995 construction period failing to obtain the necessary approvals from both the City of Orono and the Metropolitan Council to extend sewer to the property. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 1996). Page 3 of 7 4. 5. ATTEST: Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions ot this resolution shall constinite a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 1995. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of M^h, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ’ Notary Public Page 4 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared____________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared____________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of ss. , 199___, before me a Notary PublicOn this_________ within and for said County, personally appeared______________________^ ____________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A r rci r-'-^Tcr- c:i::-.TcrcTirr^<^;« ^ u,.., f. ^-.d -;, -,«rr««^r.-. oi Ordr.c ?dir.d; i\ i in Orcno roin^ Al«: -.h,-. W- oi '-o--s,9 « -.i-^ toil .d4.,diw-..- -h, C«««ur., o: v.d :&ii5u irx desor'.’-ctt Ur.«: ♦•ca tht Sorthwesn«riy oorr.s. Oer.tftr Avrsr.u^ toS.SS folRt: th%r.o« ecuti“.«?’-y cf L/J-- ?.«»rr6r^o=oJ'- of *wppxt southweeterlv on a‘iird'rSto oi 221.17 i«i » il»- :ri; oi 169.35 ?^;'o^^outh^^e^ on » r>'*^*r.T.ifc,l cur"/^ 00 >...4 r.i^*' ♦fc-iv tAns^r.” oo S4id litS- o< oi lis.2^; f^oi*. fLv. th'tr.s* w«sx«rly “*• «i; oi « 0.r«a/2 t«=t«V.=4-. •'1‘- ::S '.2 rrd:r*%:;d^oSn^i^ »». 2092sa.= •p;<50t lir.« A '^T.*s ----------------,. i“-.i.23 lofto norths* W tr^a ^-ca *. 5«ino. or. e^-td '•oat Itr.fe ^ p*t*t of tho wasterlv r--». ecuthv^at corner of e^lc. •r'luti'^-**/ of above de- hl'f oi vacated Canter Avenue of the westerly e^-i>>td vervendloular line; the weeterly er." h^'-i of vacated Center Avenue lyias southerly of :::o<cT. ol the northerly line oi *t'“ terly .Ur.e of Mid ; {lie dilvm easterly at riant of o^d ««'‘ vacated Center Avenue iron the of the followir.fl e-'y line with a line orawn 10 feet of eaio Can ac;ll>ed line: Co«naenciM at {{e northwesterly -er Averjue distant £59.9£ fee- a^id centerline a c'^^r S »w u.-- s: ol “m !•-« >«>»* “•' oi S £e»t to the “"‘V-j Al»l curv« to t.-.e scribod! thonoe aouttw«oter.y »1 M oi 1S3.23 ie*t, or- riant with a radius of 221.*. to*'' «• * •^j^d line there endirj;. ^ « Page 6 of 7 lir«S*»5»»»" a dlfltau-.ee of 5 . radius of 221.17 feet a difl- ear*4ential cur*/e to ^“®J^“*2*.e5uthwefltarly tangent to iaat said tar.ee of 163.23 feet; tter.ee ./rjthveeterly along a ta.tfien*of 169.23 feet; t^e^eouw^ ^ -.a.tgen- a dlBtance of 5 teet. ...e~ce difltar.ee of,urve to the right vitt a radiue of 4A0.7 ^?ial'carve to the ‘^““j^eat’ts'lasVeetd carve » . US.21 -'•■;= *5*S'.n--"t*eSi ecuthaesterly elohJ a distance of 107.oO -ecw. >.*•« distance ot 13.7 curve to the left wit., a ra-*^ o - ctirve a distance o: feet; thence aoutherly to the left 6.S feet; thence ecut.nerly >^3 9 feet; thence sovtth- «lth a radius of 163.7 dl^^ce Of 20.5 feet; erly ^ described ^ radius thence southerly on a centerline of aald Eor- 78.1 feet to ita tntaraectlon ?;r .Ave.nue. and said line there ending.. Page 7 of 7 reaiOQi ^5. To: From: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: February 9, 1995 #1992 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 13.8 acres. Pertinent Ordinances 1. • 3. 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for restoration of retaining walls within lakeshore protected area. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Retaining walls supporting underground entrance to greenhouse to be replaced at approximate 6 ’ height and are located within the 0-75’ setback area. Required = 75’ Existing = 45’ Proposed = 45’ Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) - Variance to oversized accessory structure code. Allowed = 3,000 s.f. Existing = 5,478 s.f. Proposed = 5,478 s.f. (59’ x 26’ greenhouse addition* to be restored consists of 1,534 s.f.) * Greenhouse addition is located 50+’ from public road and 80’ from side lot line. Variance required as major structural improvements are proposed for a major part of the oversized accessory structure. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structure in excess of 750 s.f. major structural improvements are proposed. Structure is located at a substandard setback. Required = 15’ from side lot line Existing = 0’ Proposed =0’* ♦ Structure is located 50+’ from public road. Zoning File #1992 Februar>' 9, 1995 Page 2 5.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. 0-75’ setback area = 130,834 s.f. Existing = 21,557.5 s.f. or 16.47% Proposed = 21,939 s.f. or 16.76%* * 250 s.f. of 10’ service drive originally proposed as a grassed drive. 160 s.f. of a paved 4’ walkway accessing to lakeside deck at southeast comer of property. 30 s.f. of retaining wall to be repaired and not included in original hardcover facts. 75-250’ setback area = 317,893 s.f. Existing = 49,923 s.f. or 15.7% Proposed = 55,163 s.f. or 17.35% Increase results with 5,240 s.f. of new service drive hardcover (original grassed drive). List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List D - Description of Request E - Hardcover Inventory, 0-75’ F - Hardcover Inventory, 75-250’ G - Resolution No. 3343, File #1868 H - Elevations-Garage/West Elevations Wall and Greenhouse I - Elevations-North and South Greenhouse J - Original Survey for Application #1867 Reflecting Path to Dock Area K - Resolution No. 3342, File #1867 L - Floor Plan-Greenhouse and Garage M - Survey/Site Plan Reflecting New ami Existing Hardcover Improvements Review of Previous Application In October of 1993, applicant received approval of three comprehensive land use applications dealing with caretaker apartment within the principal structure (#1966), hardcover improvements within the 0-75’ setback area involving a third access stairs with lakeside deck (#1967) and conditional use permit and variance application involving the large accessory structure on the property dealing with a conditional use permit for the use of an existing guest house apartment and a variance to the existing oversized accessory structure (#1968). In April of 1994, the City granted variances (Application #1907) for the repair of existing access paths within the 0-75’ setback area on the east shoreline. Zoning File #1992 February 9, 1995 Page 3 The current application involves major structural repairs to the 59 x 26 greenhouse addition connected to the oversized accessory strucnire totaling 1,534 s.f. in area. The existing foundation shall be retained and the upper portions of the stnicture to be replaced with a new aluminum and Blass upper structure. The existing brick foundation shall be repointed and new brick veneer placed over existing masonry walls on the south side of greenhouse structure. The structure shall be at approximately the same height. As already noted above in the facnial findings, the greenhouse addition is located 50+’ from the public road and 80’ from the side lot line and meets the requ red setbacks. The oversized accessory strucnire was formally recognized by the City in October of 1993, review Exhibit G. The detached accessoiy garage at the east lot line shall also sustain major structural repairs consisting of a new root, new doors, replacement of wood facia and rafter tails. The walls running along the east and south lot lines shall also be repaired or replaced. The walls located within the side yard (50’ in from the street) are 6’ in height and would not require approval of a variance. The entrance walls located 50+’ from street and at 6’ in height will also not require variance approvals. The application also involves the reconstruction of a retaining wall at the underground entrance to the greenhouse located within the 0-75’ setback area where no strucnires are allowed. The wall supports the banks of an underground tunnel that accesses beneath the greenhouse. Retaining walls are proposed at 30 s.f. reflecting no change in hardcover. The .29% increase in the 0-75’ hardcover inventory reflects the 30 s.f. of retaining wall not included in original calculations, a driveway originally proposed as a grassed drive at 12’ width (refer to Exhibit M) at 250 s.f. and 160 s.f. of a pathway providing access to the lakeside deck/stair structure approved in 1993, refer to Exhibit J. The survey/site plan of 1993 revealed the path but hardcover facts never reflected the new hardcover proposed originally at an 8’ width. Statement of Hardship The hardships set forth in the resolutions for Applications #1867 and #1868 are applicable for the current review. Issues for Consideration 1.The original survey for Application #1867 reflected an 8’ paved path to the dock at the east shoreline, portions of which are located within the 0-75’ setback area. Does this information have an impact on your recommendation? Zoning File #1992 February 9, 1995 Page 4 2. 3. 4. The original survey reflected a 12’ grassed service drive with gravel bed beneath, portions^of which were located within the 0-75 ’ setback of the west shoreline. The grassed drive as proposed would not have been considered hardcover. The drive has been installed at a 10 ’ width, relocated and has been paved with asphalt. Does this information have an impact on your recommendation? The greenhouse addition portion of the oversized accessory structure meets all required setbacks of the LR-IA zoning district and accessory structure code. None of the structural improvements involve complete reconstruction of either the greenhouse or detached garage. Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: Applicant to provide written confirmation of a date when the new septic system serving principal structure and detached caretaker residence is to be installed. The Bracketts Point neighborhood was reviewed by staff during the recent septic moratorium for the purpose of determining future septic capacity and need for sewer. The Bracketts Point neighborhood was found to have adequate and suitable areas for septic expansion and was classified as the lowest of the defined 10 "hot spots" as to the need for sewer. The applicant agreed to install new septic system once the City had resolved the issue of potential sewering of the 1. area. 2.If the removal of hardcover improvements will be required as a condition of approval, removals must be completed prior to City’s issuance of building permit for restoration of structures. / CITY OF ORONO - V'ARJANCE APPLICATION / f f (\ 0 sInitial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) ^ 3 H Variance for non-conforming strucmres $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r i t V f'h J » w ^ V. A PROPERTY INFORMATION Site AHHrp^s ia?n Brac kptts Point Road •p * “ ■ - : t f i» .a V w .. V V vv , »- r i w ' . A W Omnn. MN tJlLC /^LILUWOO ----------------------------- Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) 11-117-23-32-00^--------- Attach legal description to application if not included on requu^d survey. Date Property Arguired March 1992 uw. ^ r • im » t ■ f * -*-wV w V (month/year). i I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: __presidential ------^other (specify) Zoning District:^______________—-------------------- irant Ob&feU) 612-786-7711 (O^ffice) ^ Kraus-Anderson Construction Phone(work)_ _ "6t 111 p a n , MxJ«Jt!it D.^vxoXUii City* riT'r-lo Dinoc Address:Hfi^R ftpndova ^r.rRet H£------^uy-. n^rlp Hinp.s-Zip:_55iH4. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name James and Joann JundtiNtUllC ---------------- ~ -----------------------------------------------------—------ Address:2200 Huntington Point RoadCity: Wayzata Phonefhome) 612-471-0299 Phone (work)___ Zip: 55391 Estimated Construction Cost $ 150,000.00_.... . _no (attach additional sheets if necessary) ui * t wi**r. fv-A/'T r^FTC^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lo- _ I j,mrI* tmu L. t a. L. - : \‘Z\\vvv .V; V'A V'U.t i-v* Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage,V '. t 1 /V iCOl i<01 X SetbacK: ___Front Side Rear -7 u* u. Average Lakeshore V'k.. Other (specify) hardship /description of unusual property CONDmONS . strLture. oarage and brick retaining wall are deteriorated an^ dangerous and need to be replaced or repaired^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All nf th. following information must ^.hmitted bv the application deadline date in or^ for vour aPDlication to be considered complete^ 1. 9 j. 4. 5. - Herrm Counw Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 348-3271). - Ste'T^" - 7- “"calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i x 11 for reproduction. 6. 7. " E?S- 8. 9. you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff.Additional items as may uc ----- *THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF ORONO. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rraember tto ISUI variance anplientinn is not rnmnlele if the above informatiQn.has npt IksP iqtlMdS-. Tteappfe^ teSbJ^ag^^ provide all information required or AdmMstraior. agrees to pay additional fees (staff ^ not and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this applicanon and certifies that . information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature Date / S^Mr hereby acknowledges and agrees to this a^.plication and further q entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents.^ Cotmmssmn members, and CouncU members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. DateOwner’s Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Co^»ssm Meethir Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each mon^^ AppUc^ts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning and CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please m^e JLnr .n^nd in vour olace and lO advise the BuUding & Zoning Office ofto have an authorized agent attend in your place and lO advise the this change prior to the meeting 8 RUM DAIE 06/2A/9S ntiiiEPiii couMTY pROTCRTt iiiromuriuii syuilii PROPERTY OUTERS 11ST REPORT !I). PltSS^Ol PACE 12BATCH OOAPROP AOOR OIBIER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 36 11-117-23 32 OOOT OlAOO BRACKETTS POINT RD J R JUNOT I MARY J JUNOT JAftES R jurmT BOX 1CRYSTAl BAY ttt 55323 36 11-117-23 32 0010012A5 BRACKETTS POINT RD MICHAEL E LYIAI III I HITE MICHAEL I JORJA LYItl III 1245 BRACKETTS POINT HAYZATA MN 553T1 36 11-117-23 32 001101<«20 BRACKETTS POINT RD J R JUNOT I H J juimr JAMES R JUNOT BOX 1CRYSTAL BAY Hi 55323 . PROP ADPR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 11-117-23 32 0017 01300 BRACKETTS POINT RO GEORGE S PIlLSOliRY ET AL GEORGE S PILLSOURY 4000 FIRST DANK PLACE MPLS HN 55402 36 11-117-23 32 0016 01220 BRACKETTS POINT RD ELLA P CROSDY ELLA P CROSBY 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RO HAYZATA m 55391 36 11-117-23 32 0019 01200 BRACKETTS POINT RO J01R4 S PIUSBURY JR ET AL JOIlfl S PILISOURY JR 4600 FIRST BANK PLACE MPLS m 55402 PROP ADOR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR .<5 11-117-23 33 0001 01420 BRACKETTS POINT RO J R JUNOT A N J JUNOT JAMES R JUNOT BOX 1 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 36 11-117-23 33 0004 01450 BRACKETTS POINT RD MARIIIA S A A LAC . AN REED MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REED 1500 BRACKETTS POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 36 11-117-23 33 0005 01460 BRACKETTS POINT RO R A L HEADRICK ROGER L A LYrtl C HEADRICK 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD HAYZATA rtl 55391 PROP ADDR dtlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 n-117-23 33 0004 01500 BRACKETTS POINT RD MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REED MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REED 1500 BRACKETTS POINT RO HAYZATA m 55391 Total batch 004 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AtIO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXAT10N» TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE • • • • • ‘J } V-N r^2sss^' -V D CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPLICATION EXHIBIT A 1420 Bracketts Point Road Oronoy MN DESCRlPTinN OF REQUEST 1) Repair and rebuild exisung stone wall at tunnel that connects to existing Greenhouse. 2) Construct a new C reenhouse structure on existing foundation and rebuild existing brick wall at Garage Service Court Area. 3)Repair and rebuild existing garage on existing foundation and repair existing brick retaining wall that runs east and west on property. hardcov -er calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) ^ FVTSTTNG H.\RDr!QVER tN ZO^E 75-250’25-500’500-1000’ 196 s.F. A. House B 0 ai. Ltfcgtii Wiiitb X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage C. Dnvtway^ (Public)\ X s ss 90 s.F. s.F. D. Sidewalk (Stone Steps) F?5 S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck .X X 245.5 s.F. S.F. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X as s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOT.^L H.ARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL B 1T0.834 _ * 100 21.557.5 S.F. 130.834 S.F. 1 R 47 proposed HARDOOV^R in zone A. House Boa_t_----------------- 196 S.F. Length Width X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage __ C. Driveway (P u ^ 1 i X X 20.591 S.F 250__S.F. n rs'-. A‘ B 1 : . ' ■ J /»-e lot D. Sidewalk (Stone Steps) 525 S.F. 4-vva ^ X X s.^. E. Patio/DeckPathways X X 187 160 s.F. S.F. ----- /N e. a; F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. s.F. S.F. G, O0;=r Retaining Wall S.F.e k, total hardcover in zone total property area in zone . 21,939 -rB_ m 130,834 X 100 = 21.939 S.F. 130.834 S.F. 16.76% A B 13 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) hardcover C.ALCULATION WORKSHEET 75-2i0^^ 25-500’0-75’ EXisTiyr; hardcqvtr ts zovE A. House —-------------- Caretaker’s House Wid* X X X B. Garage Caretaker * s Garage C. Driveway ------—X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other Tennis Court total hardcover in zone total property .area ln zone A 49.923 ^^ B 317 ■ 893 X 100 PpnPOSFD H^pnrnvFR IN ZONE A. House _ Length Caretaker’s House Width X X X C^r^etaker ’ s Uarag¥ C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other Tennis Court total hardcover in zone total property area in ZONE A 55.163 - B . 500-1000’ s 8.386 s.F. ss 5,884 s.F. 8 S.F. S.F.4 8 1.400 S.F.n % 822 ccRP7 S.F.b S.F. 229 S.F. s=t IbU S.F. 1,600 S.F. c > i ■: '■IJ «% m 305 “ S.F. \ . S.F. -V 8 S.F.V J a “ S.F. 7.320 S.F. S.F.a • ^S.F.B 8 15.7 % 8.386 ‘/ S.F. TJt 5.884 i/' S.F.K 8 ------- S.F. 8 -----------------"^S.F. 1.400 /s.F. p 022 •/ — yi™- 23.827-/S.F. ------ 5.240 S.F.' 229 ^ S.F. ---------" 150“S.F. 1,600 ^ S.F. ----------- 3057 S.F. S.F. ---------------- S.F. --------------------S.F. 7,320/s.F. 55,163 S.F.A B---------------^S.F. 2S5 17 . J 5 ^ 1 ^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL C NO. ^ ^ % A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONT>ITIONAL USE PERMIT PER \rUNlCIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10 23 SUBDIVISION AND A VARIANCE ?Sti 6n 10.03, SL^DI\TSION 9 (C-2) file no. 1868 UTORE4S James R. Jundt and M. Joann Jundt (hereinafter die 'appUcanis") ate the owners p;op;try located at 1400 Brachens Point Road within the C.t>- of (hereinafter "Cit>'") and legally described as: Refer to Exhibit A attached hereto (hereinafter "property ); and WHEREAS the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a condittonal use tt to ^ilow the -ntmued use ^ a in arXr:orl-"^ ~ -- be allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. findings 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1868. J. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed die application on ?'P^“ and recommended approval of the conditional use petrmt and vanance proposed based on the following hardships or umque findings. a.The property consists of 13.8 acres and can easily support residential unit. Page 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. V/ 6. b. c. 3irucrurc docs not meet the required side yard setback but the nature of the structure and the uniqueness of this property would suggest that even if subdivided in the future, it is unlikely that this s ;ture would remain as a principal structure. The subject structure has existed for over fifty years. The City Council fmds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the continued use of the guest house will not be detrimental to the health, safety or oeneral welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding propeny values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely served as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the fmdings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit to allow the continued use of the guest house strucnire as it exists and to approve a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C-2) recognizing the guest house is approximately 2,478 s.f. in excess of the allowed area for an oversized accessory structure, subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 5 trnrnm CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.__^_^;^^---------- '// 1. j. 4. Violation of or non-complianco with [e'r^lrrsnnU herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned L“! °h:m^"a““tS^ r"^^^ ^ ^»ain of title of the propen>'. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this lllh day of October, 1993. ATTEST: j \ ,^'^yruL^L^ /^Dorothy NT Hallin, City Clerk Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. ----------------------- STATE OF MINNESOT.\ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Mayor and Cicy Clerk of ret oft nta mrcipa, corporaiion and said insunmen. was execuied on behalf of ihe City. te—• STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) J) Notary Public iZlk ss. ~ “s?~rr»--£ «■ »■ ■ ■nil if 199 •/ ♦ before me a Notary Public JAMIE L BOSMA notary PUBUC-MINNESOW HENNEPIN COUNTY My Comm. Eioi« 12-19-97 NotatyJPublic STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) dayof^Dcie^e^^,199 fotary PuJjHc SSedgeVr he (Srey) execu.ed Use same as his (iheir) tree ac^nd deed. f t yfO i, Notary^blic Pase 4 of 5 twrnVM^Onm II O V 0 \\ CITY of ORONO r» ;i RESOLUnOiN OF Tlffi CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF NUNNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) dav of 199__before me a Notary the foregoing instrument, an act and deed. notary public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 199 before me a Notary pe„oc(s) dcscnbed dicknowledged that he (they) executed the same hithe foregoing instrument, an act and deed. notary public Paae 5 of 5 I /o. o CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUKCIL NO. Exhibit A 'r»; rc corMTCT? cwry-rygL'ifrna* r.TcroTC^ Lota •'.» fe.".3 R^^rrv.^'ts'sr.t of Oror.o .-^oint. Also: oi ® irj descr-.tetl Ur.c. jy {„, th< Konhwee^rly conar Center Av*r.u« jB3.9j J.-r. eoutherly fclona r.f u.-. '.. s«rrtr£««-. ci wSth-e.terly on . tar.£entlal curve to t-'J t.ar.ce of 169.38 *eet; *j^,sr.&e acuthveeterly on a deacrlV.ea curve a ^L''. rf^dlns of <4fi.72 feet a distance tanfier.v.al cur/e to .^yi^tanfient to said last de- ot 11S.2*; feet; thence 5 i^et^h^r.ce westerly nahir.£ ar. scnt^d curve a rllv' a distance of 79.3 ar.£ie of 44 Slnnewnxia and there tettilr.atlna; suo-jrct l^*:dri:er;e^%Sre: r... 2092886: Also that part of vacated ^J^*jJ^7orR«arrangeMnro£^Oroft^ dedicated to the lubllc *T'e*elon Of the northerly Point. :ylh£ southerly of the «d northerly of line of Ut 4. said Rearranaeaent [,;t 4 a line drawn westerly 1®2.29 feet northerly froa frca a point on said weet ll..e dlst ‘ p^j,. fj* r,he westerly the southwest corr.er o^ ealc. aouth**-***/ of said aVx<ve de half of vacated Center Avenue Qf the westerly ecribed perpendicular l^he; and a of the westerly ex- hilf of vacated Center Avenue lyirtg southerly of ter-3ton of the northerly line of said uftsterlv •line of said a line drawn easterly at riant aniles .of said west- vacated Center Avenue ni7ea3te*’'‘*y*of"the followlr.« de- scribed lice; iy Irca the northwesterly ter Aver.ue distant ;?®;?^j780Uthe ’*'y alona said centerline a comer of said U>t 5; ^f the line being oe- dlstar.ce of 5 feet to the point of ^ curve to the scribed; whence aouthweater.y ®dlsttrile of 169.38 feet, andright with a radius of 221.17 feet a aio^c — -aid line there enuir.a. r««sxs CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. W Ic • % Also.V,. O' voco'-ed 3or->r Avenue « '.eiS eve «d ^dl=«ei_ov,r : and hcvcsa part c. U- line of aaid Center Avenue er.d a uhlcn lies between .n *venue at rifllnt ar.slei to the line dre'-’T. drawn ac«aa aald of interaaction of, side llr.ee o: .eld ecner A«“« fii.;, s.ecrlbed eo ful- :the =.n-..rlli.. ol eeie 8orce.- Avenue Iowa: SaginnlriE a- a yo.nt ^ha --orthwaat comar oi aatd t«..ce ol fee.. ^ j, ,cu--b».at.rly .loiu a -.arjen- curve a dlatance o- - . -./44m- o# 44a 7“* feet a distance oft-Ml '-urve to the pignt wxth a radius or 440. /- . iCc 'JR <»*et: thence southwesterly tangent to last katar''-'’of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential discM-- 0. lu/.^ -c . ^ distsr.ee or 19.7 -e^S lltlharli tJ^ent to last said curve a diata.nce of I” 'e« iSenc" acuiLrly aldni a th« a JJth- u[% a .-adiuo of 16S.7 feet a distance of 53.9 er'y tange.nt to last described curve a distance o. 20.5 'n;nc^“d«hcrly on a tanaanUal curv. to of 78.1 feet to its intersection wltn tr.e cen^erii der .Ave-nue, and said line there ending. r««i7ii £ *aiQ/tei t?d > »—H I J - - 0) rro) ;: ^ -= ns^ * 5 <T> 0.2 0>•-i 7d^ > o «‘^^e, B t ■% i I V- i \J 1 ^ 1 • «•♦•• 4 ^ »*4 •« »M»< »♦»>♦♦»• • /■ 1' /HI \z ..r :^:1 N •iff: •'» # pt ;!r| ^ ^ ill Qm. > .•*«• ••*•>1 \ ..^■ tw ^ n } “. p t WdoDd itt I IV? ” f «a 3 3?3 rti <Tl ^ w :z: >5 h—fo •:2: I 5 ? uy jH1 i -II_____________II 11 • *” ■ " * n • ^ \ \| / IFt^ \ /] X-C>m tl ******> »««^a «•»•••» 4 lU’A .♦ •*'. t I ■; V I '» y < • ^ •’N iS'\ >nj -I A ■ ' X. f. \ % ^ *x UOAinOUSI- A ^OOC'K '^. 4fe Apcn pw/j^ \ iN X' <>1Wn C w0eiW ». # N • - ^r ^ V' c^ ■" s ^C'" s> - iJ^ir^M ^ N ^. . N-.Nx ^ iV. t-'.v..fXy \ is. t>rMAf»e-.'Wr\ • ^t" KUHTi X*. ^■) ''<*K >''^s /! '■■ / *•<' / '•v •• w \ \/ W 1^ ‘wi#' ' I 1 r ’ ♦• * fc/' a //?'L^/■/ •V k'-^: -i I t t I / trr ib'MW [|n&) X>^lL mcAoOiA »i. »• * r in f ■ ■ {\/ n IEA'2 >:VAVr^^ 3feNv^^(u-icO 'fe.N I ..- 7.i:ii 1 * mm *• •• *^.. • •y. / » -i. ‘I**. ; %# •] /\•V 1^1 . ' ■ J ; /: 7 '. t* J -i^. •• ?• / V.; -••V ., . ifV • *« . • *"*V ■■ Hayi ir'’»l :.:"v . . «* • • * .» • • ' * *•* *< ^., • ' *» » »■. k *. •♦ >. , V ‘ s f‘ • #, -.- / *.l '-* . • .•- • • *•• » .’.■^ / I • • <’: • f •V * * I ! ’ f ' ' f • • V • ■ ' *•'•/»*•*» '•* •» . • • * ‘ . '* * ,.*'•* . . * * **•.• ‘ • • * ' ■. * ■ *. « . i ■ . .* • .^ * ^ * .. • 5'-- '■ •• Ik;-^ -v!:'•:;-v • *;■..^ . •;• ■.’ • • •.. •• >•: s .“•■ •'. :•• -vv-' 'V - • •.‘..v • •; •* •;l *.♦ 1 . •. •• • ' • •. .• • *a ; » .• / / I . / • I t 7 • . / «•'.* f m *•• ♦ ••■ *t - >,• •.Nf'S'- *5. . . ■ * * » ► . :vU^ -‘ ■ A ^-: :--v :•.••>r' ■f': .\: //• • .V; .• •' ',•: ••. •.•..•. ’•... ' • *. • •'• •• .>• •/.. ”• .'•.^■\J'-/\ ••• » ’ • ^ M .• s*:*^ •-.I ••* . '..<• . I v--> ••;,■ - •‘ • r,v:i,.v '.'• • •:.:•- *•....;• ;. • \J V-' •••... ••.'•• • f« • '• * • I *»• •.»»•* -i.' •t, * •• * •0 . •' A : \/ . • .•••/ i ... ,.. .... ...... V ;. V f • .. , . • • /..,• • • ... , •• ; • > ______■■•• I ; • V •-• . : • • •• ’-yy ■■;________ ■ »•••.■••, ;. •____. . ■• ■ • • KCITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.0-^ ■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO \a7«lCIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS I (B) AND . FILE #186" w-HFREAS James R Jundt and M. Joann Jundt (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of^p^ “ated a. 14«) Brachetts Point Road within the City o. Orono (hereinafter "City”) and legally described as follows: Refer to E.tliibit A attached hereto (hereinafter "the property ). and with landmg deck to be yji s.f. or .55% exist, and where total Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^1867. The property is located in the LR-1 A. Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 13.8 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this 1993, and recommended approval of the vanances as proposed based up following fmdings: Page 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO .V^ vr RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A. lleshorfptopeni^s wto st«p (F). 114 s.f. of new hardcover results with the installation of the lakc-ide deck. B. c.Entire property has over 1.600 lineal feet of shoreline. The east shoreline 627L^ feet has steep lakeshorc banks requiring an access stairs. 4.The City Council finds that the conditions e,xisting on this property are Pecuhar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district, tlwl ES'XhSr:.« light Of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this appUcation including the findmgs and recCmlleUaUons of U,c Planning Commission, repons by CiQ- sia^. co^ by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare jf the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council her^y grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Structure instruction of an access stair. 4*x4* landing at htdc7verTrO-75 ’ and a light post at the landing deck resulting m 896.5 s.f. or .hi. .;horeline setback area and a setback variance for landing deck that will be located 2 r subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 r««M0S CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. „ .pi..™;«« from extended lot lines into lake. ’i-.sTr ';s from residential properties. Annlicanis are hereby placed on notice that all existing structures in the 0-75 ’ f«h!ck area are co Jidered nonconforming and subject to all perunent sections "^oS sections of the code. Any structural repans to these sirucnires must be approved by the City. Authorities eran.ed by this variance tun with the property not with the “PP*‘^“- b^^re per^™ ve only and must be exercised by application for a buUdmg peJmU wS ryear'of the date of CouncU approval, or this vanance wdl expire on that date (October 11. 1994). Violation of or non^ompliance with any of the terms and wndtuons of ^ resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code. shaU terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be pumshable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree I?this resolmion aSd onbehalf of themselves, their ‘^1 toeby agree to the recording of this resolution in the cham of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 /o. o CITY of ORONO resolltion of the city council NO________1^:------------ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of October, 1993. AT EST:1 : o^oihyNt^^THillin. Cit>' Clerk Owner(s) ss. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument Ci olono.' a m“ m“coUtioraJ said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. notary ^'^u ^ /yy'jd^ Notary Public Page 4 of 5 rvaSOOS&iiOnii CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. . » STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of /^ O '*./, 199 y before me a Notary Public ’.viihinand for said county . personally-appeared^-’C ___V '.iu. »y t-.V known to me to be the peQan(s) descrij)cd in and who executed Ihe foregoing bstramen.. a-Sdlcknowledgcd il.ai he (they) e«cuted Ihe same as bs (*e,r) free act and deed. JAMIE L BOSrvlA NOTAflY Pl!BLC-M.Nfi£'OTA h£NNE?iN CCUNTY My Ccr.m. Exsircs 12-19-37 (Q NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) , 199 aNotiOn this — Ochhp-I^ . y Public svithinand for said county, ,,,„ibed itvrfnd who executed ihe foregoing instmment. aiidacknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. JEAN 0. SCANLO^N NOTAITWIUC MJNNt«DU ' W MY COMMISSION ^*ES JANUAIY 3L 2000 (7) ■ CL^JsJ rjNOTARY BUBUC Page 5 of 5 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. Exhibit rt Lots S, ot Or^ino ?oin^; 51..w.T t-u- o* Lois 9 wicl 10. R«arrftr.55:=«.'^t of Oron'j Polr.t vid Also: .hit ;*<urt o. (^-,d IJistcrlv --t th* follsw UiiB »c>'.iotiwiL* tli'sf'si.‘j ly*uie "• 4_ ofllr^-* Ccssincln^ it i POir.t In th» cin.o.i.... ci-th'hha« ik'.Si i«-. n.o«herly troa th. Sot-.hueswriy cs^er o1"u- ' OS Orono ?olr.-.: thor.oo scut nor lyolor^ tiT.£er.tlil curve V j the rlgr.t with i i:r^ ir.ali of 44 cicareis 42 einut6« to the ?" iHo « io ‘rO« Ivo»o « oponod to r-«- 2W2M6; Also thi- pert of vicitsd Center Avenue as siid totto 'SiHLnv rri^L?% i line drwn Jt^^j^'^dlatint l^.2S feet northerly fromr^LriofnieJ vr.it ^rt of t^riv half of ViCited Center Avenue lylM scribed perpendloulir line; and also . tvtft**uee»er’y ex- half of vacated Center Avenue „ acutherly oftension of the northerly line of said Lot h and ‘ Tune drawn easterly at riaht aniles -to tne Ilid’vwt- vacated Center Avenue iron the point of erly line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following ^ sci^bid line: Cocnencina at a point in the ter’Averxie distant 569.9£i feet northerly frea t..e ‘s tes.oa t«.. «d said line there endirji. ‘ _ fvm SOM Oiw. Onm CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. • % Alco , . Ave-'ue as laid cu^ and deatcaie- over : esid S«<u-rsr.SJ=«t oJ Orono Poir.. „-j »cross P«*- »• .,y line of aeid C-Miter Avenue end a union -ilea teld'^rOer Avenue »t right arjlea to the ilSe Unea of ..id " '"^un fllM deaorined .. lol-! the centerline o* eexd . centerline of eeid Center Av lows: EaginnlnE at a po..*t of the northweet comer o# said enu. dla«nt 5SS.95 t..t “::^!r^%°;.,;.iine of a»ld enter Avenu. ut »: thence ;";“^l^neVe eoStherly and eouthueiterlv ..an! . j e dlatMoe of V f'- . a radlu. of 221.17 feet a dla-tKigential cuwe to the rlw- tangent to leet e^ tanee o: 169.c8 fee-. the..oe ew ,^.v«„terly along a tangen-eurve a dlataneeaf i feat. .has ^ di.tance of tial ourva to the rlgn. uit.. a rao.» ^ , 119.2i de«;: •“^••"J^i^^outhueaterly along adi8^ar.ce ct 107.30 .eev. •n.ncc o«a dtaiar.ee of 19.7 curve to the left with a radl^ curve a dlata.'ice of feet: th.no. .outherly “.^tligSntlafcurv. to the left8.8 feet; thenoe ecutherly .^o« a tment.ai ulth a raolu. of 1SS.7 ^TjtMee ” 20.5 feat! erly tangent to .aet deeerlb^ o ^ radlu. th.nce eeutherly on a tangential t ^ ^ „id Bor- O* 78.1 fe«^ to its Intereection wltn tr.e c Avc.rje. and sail line there ending. H-ARDCO'-ER C.-U.CLXATION WORKiHXET 3 -u-95 setback ZONT:: (CIRCLE JM!) O-'f ;5-500'500-1000’ EXISTING Ha RDCO^TR I>' ZONE; A. Hc'iis______________ Boat Lcr.g'J: 3. Gang? C. Dr.v?'-v2v IE X D SiOcwiIk ___ Stone Steps X X E. Pano/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain 3y Plasnc X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA LN ZONE ^ 966.5____ B 130.834 x ICO pRopnsFn rajidcover in zont A. Hoosc Boat Ungib Wldtli X X X B. Gangc C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk Stone Steps X X E. Pacio/Deck Pothway X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other Retaining Wall TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 1.098 - B . =195 S.F S F s S.F, s S.F S.F. S.F. s S.F. 525 S.F. =S.F. 245.5 S.F. 5 S.F. 3 S.F. Sm S.F. S.F. 966.5 S F. 130.834 S.F. 3 . 74 % 3 196 S.F. 3 S.F. S S.F. 3 S.F. S S.F. 3 S.F. 3 S.F. 525 S.F. 25 S.F. 3 187 S.F. as ioU S.F. s S.F. S-S F. S.F. 30 S.F. 1,098 S.F. 130.834 s . d4 “?0 A B A B 13 Faegre & Benson PROrCSSIONAI. LIMITBD I.IAaiLITY AA(*TNBI»SMia lioo NoRTtST CEfmn, 90 South Seventh Street .VU nneapous , Mint ^esota 5540x-)90i TILiPHONt 612*336-3000 FACSIMILE 612*336-3026 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Re; Jundt Residence Bracketts Point March 7, 1995 Thomas M. C rosby , Jr . 612/336-3127 MA.R 8 W95 Dear Ms. Mabusth: We have discussed from time to time the requirement that the Jundts upgrade the sepisc .ystem which serves their house and the detached accessoiy structure on Bracketts Point. Some time ago it was agreed that upgrading of the septic systems to current code would await and inspection of all of the systems on Bracketts Point (which took place in 1994) and a determination by the residents of Bracketts Point that, as group, they were prepared to petition the City of Orono for a municipal sewer. We are working with the Jundts to canvas the residents of Bracketts Point concerning the petition for a municipal sewer. I understand from you that, even assuming such a petition were forwarded, presently the City of Orono is not empowered to construct a municipal sewer pending the modification of the Comprehensive Plan which needs to be approved by the Metropolitan Council. In the event that a petition for municipal sewer is not possible either by reason of the desire of the residents of Bracketts Point or the required approvals of the Metropolitan Council, the Jundts will be required to bring their existing systems up to code. Subject to specific approvals to the contrary by the City of Orono, they have agreed and have authorized me to indicate to you that the will upgrade the septic systems for the main house and the accessory buildings during the 1995 construction season. Minneapolis Denver Des Moines Washinpon, D,C. London Frankfurt Almaty Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth March 7, 1995 Page 2 If you would like further detail on these matters, please contact me. Sincerely, ( <Sy^ Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. TMCxfk cc; Mr. and Mrs. James R. Jundt Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Ml:00t6S6S.0l SEE OVERSIZED DOCUMEI1T!! REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Marcli^^l995 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1996 Gregg Perl, 309 Westlake Street - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA ... ... Total lot area = 1.6 acres (Since the tiling of the application, the applicant has applied for the legal combination of parcels 05-117-23 23 (X)21 and 0020.) Refer to Exhibit L. Pertinent Ordinances 1 Section 10.03, Subdivision 4 - Prohibition. It is unlawful to convert, enlarge, reconstruct or alter any structure or use any structure or land for any purpose nor in any manner which is not in conformity with the Zoning Chapter. 2. Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side yard setback variance. Required = 30’ Existing = 12’ (3’ eave to south side of residence considered an encroachment when a substandard setback exists) List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Applicant ’s Letter Confirming Connection to Sewer in June of 1995 E - Survey F - Floor Plan Lower Level G - Elevation - Rear - Approved with Application #1104 H - Current Elevation I - Resolution No. 2318 J - Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. Letter 10/5/87 K - Gaffron Letter of 12/8/87 Advising of Need for Building Permit L - Application for Legal Combination of Property M - Letter from Owner of Property Located at 3965 Bayside Road Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated February 15, 1995 and the minutes of the Planning Conunission meeting for more detail and background on this review. Applicant Request for Council Action continued Page 2 of 3 March 8. 1995 #1996 Gregg Perl. 309 Westlake Street______ __________________________________ proceeded to make improvements within an upper level of the southwest comer of the residence involving bedroom expansions in a portion of the building that did not meet the required side setback." Work was done without a permit and a Stop Work Order was issued by staff when work was discovered in progress. Applicant filed the necessary side setback variance application in addition to applying for the legal combination of homestead parcel and the undeveloped parcel to the immediate west, refer to Exhibit B. The property is located within 500-1000’ of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed 35% hardcover. The property was approved at 25.4% hardcover in an earlier land use application in 1987 when the property was only .8 acres. That application involved side, rear and height variances for major additions to the existing residence. This specific portion of the strucmre did not require a height variance (refer to Exhibits G and H). The Planning Commission reviewed specific violations on the property dealing with an accessory strucmre "that was installed without a building permit and found to encroach into the northern adjacent property. There are also exterior storage violations on the residential property. Note the letter from the neighbor to the immediate north (Exhibit M) advising of his concern that the strucmre still remains as originally installed encroaching into his property. In 1987 staff sent a letter to Mr. Perl advising him of the need for a building permit for the installation of the shed. Exhibit K. Approval of the side setback variance will be conditioned on applicant obtaining a permit and relocating stmcmre to a conforming location. Planning Commission Recommendation Four of the five member Commission recommended approval of the application as proposed based on the hardships set forth in the earlier 1987 review (Exhibit I) and the fact that applicant has acquired additional land increasing property area from .8 acres to 1.6 acres. Approval was conditioned on the following: Applicant to obtain a building permit for the improvements within the existing principal strucmre and for the relocation of storage strucmre on property. Both permits shall be subject to a penalty fee. Applicant to provide an approved physical restraint on patio door at upper level as applicant does not plan to install deck or access stair at this time. Current and fumre owners to be placed on notice that any further expansion of deck or access stairs within substandard side yard will require additional variance review. 3. Approval of the expansion of bedrooms within this strucmre will require applicant to connect to sewer by June 15, 1995. 1. Request for Council Action continued Page 3 of 3 March 8, 1995 #1996 Gregg Perl, 309 Westlake Street 4. All exterior storage violations on the property shall be removed by July 1, 1995 except that applicant must remove all equipment and materials stored on neighboring property to the north as soon as weather permits but no later than April 1, 1995. The minority opinion of one felt that patio door should be altered to a window because of the indefinite time for ftmire deck or access stair addition. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. W COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 19% WHEREAS, Gregg Perl (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 309 Westlake Street within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lots 1. 2, and 3, Block 2, Hillside Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow expansions of the existing roof envelope where a portion of the structure is located 12 ’ from a side lot line where a 30’ side setback is required. The proposed structural improvements will result in an addition of two bedrooms within the second level of the southwest comer of the residence. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1996. 2. 3. The property is located in the LR-1A Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring two acres in area. The total property consists of 1.6 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on Febmary 22, 1W5 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. The property receiving the most impact by the substandard setback of this structure is a residence located approximately 60’ away. The expai^ion of the roof envelope will not cause any significant encroachment on light, air or open space in the immediate neighborhood. Page 1 of 5 B. The expanded roof structure will not be visible from the lake. C. Hardcover allowed on this property is 35%. Hardcover is at approximately 14%. D. Applicant has acquired additional lands doubling the area of the property from .8 acres to 1.6 acres. E. The City has received no negative comments from the property owner to the immediate south receiving the most impact with the expansion of the roof line of the residence structure. F. The footprint of the existing structure is 15 ’ from the side lot line ^d the 3’ eaves that extend southward are located 12 ’ from the side lot line. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5, The City Council has considered this application including the findings and reconunendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit strucniral expansion of the roof where portions of the structure are located within a substandard side yard requiring approval of an 18 ’ or 60% side setback variance, subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4. Applicant shall connect to municipal sewer by June 15, 1995 because of the expansion of bedrooms within the structure. Applicant to obtain a building permit for improvements within the existing principal structure and for the relocation of a storage structure by April 1, 1995. Both pennits are subject to a penalty fee. Principal structure improvements shall include method for restraining opening of patio door at upper level. All exterior storage violations on this property shall be removed by All equipment and materials stored on adjacent property located at 3965 Bayside Road shall be removed no later than April 1, 1995. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a buUdmg permit by April 1, 1995. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tWs resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assign, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, February, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 6.TO:Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: February 15, 1995 SUBJECT: #1996 Gregg Perl, 309 Westlake Street - Variance - Public Hearing ^"'"*Tot^"rea PID 05-117-23 23 0021 and 0020 = 1.6 acres Pertinent Ordinances Section 1reconstruct or alter any stnicture or ^ My or land for any purpose nor in any manner which is not in conformity with the Zomng Chapter. Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B) - Side yard setback variance Smg“ = ir (3- eave to south side of residence considered an encroachment when a substandard setback exists) List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat C - Property Owners List D - Applicant’s Letter E - Survey F - Floor Plan Lower Level . . G - Elevation - Rear - Approved with Application #1104 H - Current Elevation I - Resolution #2318 . ^ J - Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. Letter 10/5/87 K - Gaffron Letter of 12/8/87 Advising of Need for Building Permit Description of Request The aoDlicant proceeded to install bedrooms in the upper level of the sou*west comer of ^kleLe tilJ^essitating the expansion of the roof envelope in order to meet the «qu'ied height refer to Exhibits G and H. The improvements were begun without the Ir^it Staff issued a stop work order when the work was discovered in progress. ApPheant Svisefl"^^^ a side setback variance as portions of the residence were located within the required 30’ side setback. I Zoning File #1996 February 15, 1995 Page 2 In 1987 applicant received approval of a side, rear and height variance for major additions to the existing residence. At that time applicant owned only the eastern portions of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Hillside Park. Since that time, the applicant has acquired the western portions of the property. The new improvement will require only a side setback variance and not a rear setback variance as in the earlier review. This portion of the strucmre did not require a height variance. Review Exhibit I, Resolution #2318, Condition 4 on Page 3 and Exhibit J, there was a need for septic repairs at the time of the major expansion and improvement of the residence in 1987. According to the City's files, there is no record of the applicant obtaining a permit to complete the necessary repairs. Since that time, the property was approved tor sewer with the recent Snibbs Bay sewer project. The applicant has not hooked up to sewer nor was it one of the properties that was required to connect to sewer within sixteen months. Staff did recall that he made some minor repairs that seem to alleviate the original problems with the septic system. Now with the increase of bedroom use the applicant must connect to sewer. Review Exhibit D, applicant’s letter notes that he will connect to sewer by June of this year. Parcels 0020 and 0021 must be legally combined if the City is not to include the need for a rear setback variance. The property is .8 acres. If legally combined, the total area would be 1.6 acres. In the 1987 review, hardcover was at approximately 25%. The property is allowed 35% as it is located within 500-1,000’ of the lakeshore. In a recent Stubbs Bay sewer project the total property was recognized as one unit and assessed for one sewer unit. Refer to E.xhibit E, Mr. Perl has installed a storage shed that encroaches within the properly to the west. The files reveal that a letter was sent to Mr. Perl advising him of the need for a building permit and that it appeared the shed was encroaching into the west property. Mr. Perl never obtained the necessary building permit. The building remains as a nonconforming strucmre. In recent applications, the City did not take action when there appeared to be accessory strucmres that encroached into an adjacent property. It has been our policy to allow property owners to deal with the problem. The size of the strucmre required a building permit and the applicant was notified of that need and of the encroachment. A condition of this approval must be that the shed is relocated to a conforming setback on the property. There is also an exterior storage violation on the property that must be removed either by replacing equipment within storage sheds or garage or by removing the various items from the property. Statement of Hardship Some of the hardships noted in Resolution #2318 can still hold true for current application. Note applicant has remedied the need for a rear setback variance by purchasing the remainder of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and increasing the size of the parcel to 1.6 acres. Zoning File #1996 February 15, 1995 Page 3 Options of Action Any condition of approval of the side setback variance for the property located at 309 Westlake Street must include the following conditions; 1. 3. 4. 5. Applicant to obtain building permits for the installation of two bedrooms and for the detached storage structure, both subject to a penalty fee. Applicant to connect to municipal sewer by April, May, Jung? Upon application for a building permit, applicant to advise of method to physically restrain from opening patio/deck doors at second level. Applicant is further advised that if a deck is proposed from the second level doors that a side setback variance will be necessary if a portion of the deck is located within the 30’ required side yard. Applicant to immediately apply for the legal combination of parcels 05-117-23 23 0021 and 0020. Applicant to confirm date when all exterior storage ^'iolations are to be removed for this property. 1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 a a ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.(X) 7^ F (no change from original application) . Variance for non-conforming structures 5-OO.OU After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPER^ INFOR.MAUON ^ j- Site Af’iress —---------------r C| O I Lin cT _ “i.y.fAtT lFFIC c i • VW' V unrJ^l cvv « vv «« .* * *• • Prnnertv Identification Number (P.I.D.)__Jiij5_L_2::-----------:— -----— Attach legal description to application if not mcluded on require surv Date Property Acquired^______________- . .-z------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of l^d Present use of property: presidential -----other (specify).------------- Zoning District:._________-------------------------- *. W f (month/year) applicant Name ---------——-----^ - Address: ^ 6 i u.^er^___ 0\VNER (if different than applicant) ^ Name___ Phone rhnme ) H(*' 7 Phone (work)___ City: « ( Phone(home) Phcae (work). Zip: ( Address:I ( __City:^__________________Zip:__. Hstimated Construction Cost ^ ^ description of REQUEST Describe request in detail: (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES required Lot Area _Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUB..UTTALS lUtSioe ff*!^ I ^ 2 All nf th« follo»in» information must he subinin«l by the applicatipn deadline date in ofdg fnr vour application to be considered completci 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form u • u- Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtam this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Surv'ey (signed by a licensed surveyor and mclude harfcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 A x 11 tor Topo‘rraphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existmg grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8>A" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8/2 x 11 ). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the propertv. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As anTddendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant-and Property Owner must sign this application. ^ varinnrp anplimfinn is not comnlete if the above information has not been included. Tlw^applic^ Lfeby^agrew^ provide all information required or requested by the Zoning AdminUtrator agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee parent) in review of this certifies that the information supplied is true a^ correc>^ the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature Date y - ^ acSedges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto die property by cfty staff, consultants, apnts Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investjgatrap aq^ venfication of this request. Owner’s Signature /Date this change prior to the meeting. 8 1 ^ 2V.V* o::M- fm OATl .12/20/94 ■"• 'w .• ».BATCH 504;••*“ ^ 14, ;-r-^-^ *. V PROP AOOR TAXPAYER HAW/AODR # ■ ' • • )... V *.. . ^: ’ * WW AOOR 'i'r.oMMER name ?■' taxpayer '■ V.-NAHE/AOORuY V :• \ •'J • .■; J * * • ' \ PROP ADOR OHNER NAME ^ V- TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ‘ fV * ' s Ui';; < •* ; PROP ADOR .* . ONNER NAfC •. • • • r TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDRr '"IV; • 1'^ •;• 'wt; J '^ v' • : — •• SB 05-117-2S 2S 0004 0S945 BAYSlOE RD FRED BLANCH JR FREO BLANCH JR S945 BAYSXDE RD LONB LAKE MN 55S54 SB 05-117-23 23 0020 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO eRE66 S A BETTE J PERL 6RE66 S A BETTE J PERL 309 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE m 55354 SB 05-117-23 23 0023 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO X E A M K BER6SAGEL IRV BER6SAGEL PO BOX 149 NAY2ATA MN 55391 3B 05-117-23 23 0033 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MICHAEL G FILBRANDT MICHAEL FILBRANDT 3940 BAYSlOE RD MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0M4ERS LIST38 05-117-23 23 0009 03895 BAYSlOE RD M 0 KELLEY A C A KELLEY MICHAEL D A CONNIE KELLEY 3895 BAYSlOE RD LONG LAKE (t4 55354 vi:; ' V* f • .•* 9 . • • .. s » '• • •REPORT NO. PX435401 PAGE 11Vi. ;• . • 1* * « •SS OS-117-23 23 0013 00340 NESTURE ST C R NARRER A T R NARRER CYNTHIA R i TXNOTHY R NARRER 340 NESTLARE ST IONS LARE m 55354 •V : ”•% ; * . ‘ fy:• •» N , •‘I */ ytu*• • ■ . ■ ' ■ ‘ y %' •. w . J*', '' ‘‘"***^ . V. 4 . i**|* *4*,j • •** •, • ;" ' f i • , I > i . • i (V -4 ■ •A ■ • .* » *• < 38 05-117-23 23 0021 00304 NESTLARE ST GREGG S PERL GREGG S PERL 509 NESTLARE ST LONG LARE HN 55354 36 05-117-23 23 0024 00341 NESTLARE ST I E i H R BER6SA6EL IRV DERG3AGEL PO BOX 149 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 05-117-23 23 0039 00332 NESTLARE ST B M BICHANICH SMB JANSSEN B H BICHANICH SMB JANSSEN 332 NESTLARE ST lOttQ LARE MN 55354 , . • • I ’• / J. *•!/ ' / ^ •!* 38 05-117-23 23 0022 00325 NESTLARE ST X E S H R BERGSAGEL IRV BERGSAGEL PO BOX 149 NAYZATA m . 55391 V . . •*■♦.1 ' * >* ^ ^ n ■ t • * 4. - • *' J .» • •*-' I .. 38 05*117-23 23 002S 00349 NESTLARE ST EDNA T ANDERSON ET AL N/L E EDNA T ANDERSON 349 NESTLARE ST LONG LARE MN 55354 . " • • • 1 • • »J**' ' * *• . J M “ T. • - • » * ‘ V \ • •■ .'tf ' . . • . .• TOTAL BATCH 504 00011 • #• • I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF HY RNONLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE I j% » 1.1' '•’VilI «3| •U •!) ‘f r.; OF LOTS 1, z, ANU o, dluv ;a z, niLL^iut i^aha ifK,;HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA « • I * • k . a A- sersi'E 45$70^t. 4^57.0 "H.lhiJe f^k’ Sh€0f • 'i ■ ¥’I- " 207.00 ®IS; ; • u* • • w I *,. - • f. i i '; V- ; ' . ifrl; •• • 'l l ' *'*V*'^ • ’ '■ »‘i’?''** :l** '• • ••• ". T 1*1 4’** * M5?*5’/V 456:77m,ai. 4570 7///i.</<-30* •' tLEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2. "Hillside Park" •: denotes iron marker found Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the locations of an existing house and shed thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. • .•« » lociK, Pit • I ; '■. ‘ . 5^; I• % • • *•t I t ?* » . • • . *. 9# '•/■•* ‘ '* • •« * - -w \ 'V • • *.V •• *./ • • •• •■ V ‘'. Cv f-' V-«'* ‘ '* •• *>'*' :. ' •■ 't • • W.** ' •«r \ • V . ;> f * -, '--?•♦* ••. .>•'. •.• i ■£/> ' .r .•*.*.•••'.. fcf. • •>' > .V ,* . »> I •* I ; *' T. V #• t \ •• ■ • % • V*' • \ —-rr • I L I • • *•) • «■ • ’ -•'.f.v •.. -^v ■ ■■ • ■' ;.<:' . ■ 7 AV7fc^^/'" ■ j w t.»t,w •. •.'.V r ^"k <•P s li l»^ s '•* r. if K (M ; f; . \ .; .'^^V ' 7***^ (T% e 5-•v f.•■ i ■.:: '*• .:? 5*^- «• ■'.^ : "■■ ■ •- . ■/■• ^ - :.»■ ?■ •• -7/^;-^' V-;y' ■;: 'V. .■•»■ ^ -V-. • • . , c \ • •• \ -• «' • *i 0 0 • f . ■ •• * '. . '. *• "-*■•' ‘ ■' • * ■ V .•• ^ • . • ‘ -'V ■.•■■■.■-•. .V . ..' ' -‘ i --V-V* •■• ' . ■• • t ' ' i. t r X, . . ,‘ ^ • .. , • * . ■ «i ’.'.: X • ■ l- --rf3 ■rJrTj—-:-! 7- -'-■' ^"zzz~tsz:jr"^:\y ..:::... ^ I •t——— -- r- —*— )■ r"v. . __ .TTT*".* “ *~=^ 4~"~——I • * » . * 4 ••• • miM ^ . »« , t •I • ••-;'{ '' **: vV •.' , • ;< j .. •’ • ••’^ ' ■ ■ 1 . . ’ • - V.::! U ■-* • ■ ‘ '•' .•: ^ ^ - i, ^ .. • w •• ' */‘iv V. ». --• V. « S ♦ 7I //1 • ---------------------------------------------! :.—'_____________. ***** •'“* - - —• • m • ^ 1 i •':* • • ^ ^ I •• ______, . __ _ _ ^ , • i ••’*'••*-•••-•-•*4^** »- . - ----------A . # » .« « , I__- - ^ ^ ., ^ ^ » y • *■ ■ - • ■•• ♦ • » -- — - ___ *• •»♦•-» «« • • • \ »•» * ■km*,7-^* ^" 4-’f ’ *‘'•\''' v{ ^V — ^ -■‘.‘ '■ I.'^ ■ ^ * 4 V '^*«. . •#:k^: % 4 ». *'>• •» I *►' '4 *^‘ *^‘ > "T** It--.(.v.-op,.'-''' SORQNOi City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2318________ A XBSOLDTXOa GRANTZB6 A VARZAHCS TO KoncxPAL zoaniG coos SKTXOI 10.23, SOBOXVISIOI 6 (A) S (B) FZX2 «1104 WBBRZAS, Gregg Perl, (hereinafter *the applicant*) it the owner of the property located at 309 Westlake Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City”) and legally described as followtt Lots 1, 2, and 3 except the West 270* of said lets. Block 2, Billside Pari., Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and wrzRZAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (A) to pemit the construction of a primary residential structure 35* in defined height where a defined height of only 30* is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a 12* side setback for that structure where a 30* side setback is normally required, and to allow a 27.1* rear setback where a 50* rear setback is normally required. Minnesota t ■OW, THERBPORB, BE XT RESOLVED X 1. Thisjiapplication ^was reviewed as tZoning^File ,4^ / i:.'?.^2* 5^The rproperty , i s |locatedViii j theTLR-lJ^fsi^g ’] Residential’.Zoning District. Lakeshore 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed thiarapplication^on^ February 17, 1987 and November 16, 1987, and recommended approve 1'*of .-?r the proposed variances based upon the following findings; A) Approval of the variance for a side setback of 12', finding* that the neighboring rasidence structure located at that side is more than 60* away, and this variance will not cause any significant encroachment on light, air or open space in the neighborhood. B) Approval of a variance for rear setback of 27.1 feet finding that the steep slopes behind the house makes it unlikely that a house could feasibly be constructed on the property to the rear and that that neighboring property to the rear is substandard in size, does not have sewer available, and it is unlikely that a house could feasibly be constructed on that property except near Tonkawa Road, far from applicant's house. Page 1 of 4 *\ '* j r •% ' ■ \ ? V ^*i 1 "w . - ,. -♦•J City of OR.OINO 3RQPia^J RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2318_ _ _ _ C) Approval of variance to allow a defined peak height of 35* at the front side of the house, finding that the steepnees and length of the hill behind the house and the extent of existing vegetation will tend to eliminate the encroachment of that structure above the existing tree line, and hence will eliminate any visual encroachment of that structure into the character of the neighborhood. The structure will not likely be visible from the lake due to the topography of the neighborhood. D) Applicant has revised his proposal so that the existing and the house will be attached, eliminating the need for a structurc-to-structure variance. . */ m B) Hardcover allowed on the property is 35%. The proposed hardcover is 25.4%. Hardcover is not an issue with this application.I N ee MmP) Applicant has provided information showing that it is feasible to construct Interim repairs to the existing failing septic system. Planning Commission noted that this property is within the Stubbs Bay Sewer Study Area, with a potential for installation of municipal sewer at some future date. ..il r 4. The City Council has considered this applicatien^inelodiag the findings and recommendations of the Planning ComoiissibnrC.^eports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect.^f^t^Mpro^sed variance on the health, safety • and yelfare of the 5. ^ The City Council rfinds^that^the conditions>xt¥¥ing,_^^-------^ property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to otherV^ property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not',’ adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a "'•i convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-/ ; strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the> ,> City. . * ' r-[onithis:Dj 5!.' COKLOSXOVS# OBDBS JUO) COIDXTXOVS 1- Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono -^’ty Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section .. 10 23. Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a bouse with a .- defined height of 35* where a maximum height of 30* is normally allowed,^ ^ and a variance to Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a side setback . fo 1'’* where a 30* side setback is normally required and to allow a rear ; setback of 27.1* where a 50* rear setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: ■r V Page 2 of 4 • * t'»-«i '*€ ..rV' , itT- t*" £•* *- S' •^'.* IXORON®, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2318_ _ _ _ 1. Per applicant's revised proposal* the garage and residence structure shall be attached. 2. Hardcover on the property shall not exceed 35% or 13*100 8«f* 3. Applicant shall subait a revised plan shewing the attaehaent of the garage to the house for City review prior to issuance of the building permit. 4. Applicant shall coaplete interia repairs to the existing* failing septic system no later than July 1* 1988. An extension to that date may be granted by staff if installation of City sewer appears to be iaainent and the existing system is functioning adequately at that time. Further* if installation of municipal sewer does not appear imminent as of December 31* 1988* a fully-conforming septic system shall be installed on the property no later than December 31* 1989. 5. Authorities granted with this resolution rxin with the property not with the applicants* but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval* or this variance will expire on that date (December 14* 1988). 6. Violation of ,or noa-compllance with" anytof ithe^erms and conditions ofj..this^reoolution;,shall constitute.a ,v;loIation4,of the 'y-m - >'y ;• rr' •a n V 1 K imiM ' 7.' The undersigned applicant have read* understo^ and hereby agrees. . . ^to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself* his heirs*i?j^;; ^' successors and assigns* hereby agrees to the recording of this ' ‘ resolution in the chain of title of the property. 1987 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of December*; (^A f ,>i.i</. *4^4,S «%i.-'“n.•* • ' ** * * - W. m'*^ ^ iiT^ C ' ,*^dt **i » * *t . \^* ’ •' '*• •*.'<*•*.■ ■ *• ’■ ■ “Jfc* **•' ^■ ' . . I. ^ • . ’ . k < * . 1 ' • ^ • * • ’ f ' *" ‘ < ' ’' • * ^ 'f ''. ' ■ v'*?’. ‘ ; k ' f* “. * *“* ■'‘f«« ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. Mil C>d» tafck IU>d. MIimi»»p>Iw. MW l<41« PboM Ml 3U0 OctObUT 5, 1987 Nr. Grttg P«rl 309 W«st Z«aX« Str«at Long LaJco, NN 55356 Daar Grog: At your roquost vo havo conductod an invootigation of soil conditions at your hoaosits in Long Lako, Minnosota. Tha sita is looatad at 309 Hast Laka Straat in Long Laka. Ona or nora daap borings vara takan to datact any avidanca of a high vatar tabla such as actual standing vatar In tha boring or staining of tha soil by tha action of anaarobio bactaria which liva in saasonally saturatad conditions. This aultioolorad staining of tha soil known as "aottling" , if. found, indicatas that for at laast part of tha yaar, insufficiant air is containad in tha soil to support aarobic bactaria that ara affactiva in tha purification of savaga and that tha soil is unabla to transmit normal rainfall without bacoming saturatad. Tha borings also list soil typa and taxtura sinca diffarant soil typas vary in tha rata at which thay ara abla to absorb savaga. • • Parcolation tasts vara also takan to maasura tha rata at which tha soil in tha araa of tha proposad drainfiald can absorb and traat savaga affluant. Thasa parcolation tasts ara shallow ” borings which approximata tha drainfiald in oparation. Thay ara drillad to about tha sama dapth as tha drainfiald proposad for construction and fillad with about 12 inohas of vatar. % In a clayay or silty soil, tha borings ara allowad to soak and ■, tima is allowad for tha soil partiolas to svall and fill tha .. poras in tha soil so that conditions will approximata actual .. ;; drainfiald oparation. A maasuramant is than takan of bow many minutas art raquirad for tha vatar in tha borings to drop by ' ona inch. This maasuramant is known as tha parcolation rata . and is axprassad in minutas par inch (MPZ). . . • «• :.i v‘i' • 0 jVt-M ■'s ■ •, ’ T ^■ 'V-;: im * > ♦m »* • *• i -.7^ ^ 4^. '. >- 4 ••‘W: V # *. * *.- ^ y~ 5^!* --i -• »f t • /^* sit# Evaluation: * Vr T .• » < * ' -». ** *N.. •• V «y^S2?Sl,!?“4.*^r.^t i, no ; to «U addition.! t«neh IS^nJSld'in*^: ' • ¥ .4 «r .•• ?JJi:^'bor*in;i'^. ■aSoSS!^ 4?snsss'."• # «i 1/ ic^y CT^USSt M •vtluatin® tni«;data •?»*Sinearaly,^3 pV'?- eSK :•• -* V i-i : v T:; 7 t*', • •*: 2 - » . V i ^ . . t Sba^s X«» «t ‘Oil »orln,r'^V.tSi'iSt‘'SS • 1 ' ->»* *'T' rZ^A- t“ -•♦^y *.- • .* -'.* .' \ / # N* '''•; . .-• ' - • ■r’r'->;■ ■••■ • - .•..•■ ■ '>l--‘>'*V■ - y' - y, •• • • .' •’ ■• /.••■. ••' c'/n.-'r- ;c* .-. . •■•.• • .• • ' ■••• ■ * :. r\ •■ --^r ■ l;i '--i'* *>i- '^1 V‘ -«?*T'• ‘c**,., »‘ . ' > f ^? • w *•; *4i*'?' ^ i] ’ > > v>-’^‘>’^>"‘*'’5^/' ■ V •’\ .* H . va * > ^ j> r ^ .*,- r. '' 'i '^ • . '4 * , ‘ ^ ' KQnk:-5'.^S I • • 'jJ ,' <;■ i ■ :-i I'V) » , ’ • .• . '■ P - ■.'.^i . • • .*i“ i^4t> '. 'I.\4 V » • k r, ■/ 'y 'i$ i;;.V- , *.. »■ A \ 't r If, CITY of OKOXO “a*; Gregg & Betty Perl 309 Westlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: zoning Violations on Property Dear Mr. « Mrs. Perl: or. your pr^pV/tv**/" ’'°j" P™«'ty be »toJJd*wlthVn*tV ’ ‘’’*‘ • tor.p. »bel"(l\V.qllI ”’',eM'!'’«rf *be orl.tlnp ly x ij. Jecef^**^® Without the need for ^ bJiidin* square foot allowablV rf«.?^ complaints on this sheV^\,? Rl»-'>ough we havJ de1^r?a'7 “ ‘" location Uca«e it‘•A,‘■be toni„| cJH ai^rf^n >’‘"■1 0C'0> end bf is iociV.a V ‘“‘■teO withij yoS? presuming that it is mohfi* building permit for this Mthin your side or rear yard arirf f°bile, move it to a location and at least 5* from the rear lor the side lot mS2 Sectfo requirements is^Se'tion To®ni®"^"^ ^®*^® *'«^erence for buildTnt^c*®^' Subdivision 15 (Cl &'(P) thiV^n^ f^ requiring a permit is referon square foot limit onthe Uniform Building Code. referenced as Section 301 (b) of IIL'fLT>fN*f;4 fjSiSC - 47) 7JS» Ay»LS5’*«;ADMIMSTKATIOaN 4 f JN a NO - 47J 7335 I f ( ■A W: Cregg t Betty Perl Deceober 3, 1987 Page 2 of 2Aa Zoning Administrator, Jeanne Mabusth. and i na*aA aite inspection on December 3rd, we received on Novembe? 23 1987complaint about your property. State Statute reaS^r^s (ha^ti! complainants remain confidential. The complaint^llegss; identity of Jlght^'d on'U.K"’ cquir,,.-.t durin, d.y ,„d ®* of dirt, rocks, etc. stored in the yard. C. Business being operated from the residence. "'■•“ruction prop..ty on .v.nL,I Ind Sends. ’ * "“‘t**" o» t" p?opert^? ’'««^hVv%^'not®leVei‘'v^*^%"n"y"s;etiU •• employees are present. viola-ion, and even more so when structure, would not appear to l^ave a direct re^aVA accessoryand height variances requested How*v'» relationship to the setbackthey maj have an indirnr«iatii^^rr/^;« » City Council yo.’-, additional investment in^th^ property has“I TOtential V no allowed uses of the property, staff A®' P«*’P*t'**ting counsel be prepared to address the above mention^r?^^^^ that you or your S2!p?:!*w" .“Jty^o^noVl rryVu"2iuld\r1,%^“. the p.ck.t Of infor;«II„ p'^cvid" to -“K sr',*uf.h” iVi/tit *Sincerely, ^ , < • ' y ' Michael P. Caft-f^n, Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator KPC/tln Enclosure Municipal Zoning Code Sectiom. Noted Above I• a,.« • a,* —.•V \ 4, tV^a . , L vn. il /*' CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Keiley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailins Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 C066 February 17, 1995 Hermepin County Government Center Department of Property Tax & Public Records A 607 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 ATTN: Don Deutsch. ID Controller Dear Mr. Deutsch: I hereby make request for a combined assessment on the following descnbed land: Legal descriptions: Lots 1, 2 and 3. Block 2, "Hillside Park". PIDS: 05-117-23 23 0021 and 05-117-23 23 0020 Address: 309 Westlake Street Municipal Code: 38 For 1996 Tax Year r¥ cff/Fee OwSisnature cff/Fee 6wner(s)Sisnatdre of Tax Payer(s) L ^_______________ Tax Payer ’s Address Telephone (612) 473-7357 • F.\X 473-0510 Fred Blanch 3965 Bayside Rd. Long Lake. MN 55356 612/475-1775 CTTYOP CWNO ! != Febaiary 6,1995 FEB 7 199- Mr. Gregg Perl 309 West Lake Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Dear Gregg: 1 have been trying to reach you since before the first snow last year concerning the matter of trash and other miscellaneous materials (such as a china toilet stool, large boxes. e*c.) that you have either stored or discarded onto my property. You and 1 have covered this issi^ before a d am disappointed that you continue to have so little neighborly regard for my property. I am requesting that you remove all the junk and other items placed on my property by you, or your agents, and to move the shed, that you built partially onto my property, back onto your side of the property line. in addiiion to the unsightliness, the trash is destroying the ground cover in my wood(^ aea and I therefore request that you remove all of the trash on my side of the property line within the next thirty days. If you have not removed all of the trash in thirty days, I will seek a court remedy to compel you to do so and ask for compensation for the damage you have caused. As I am informed that you intend to sell your home. I also ask that you move the shed. built a number of feet onto my properly, back onto your own property. I can apprec^te that this is difficult in the winter. Therefore. I am willing to permit you to post a five hundred (Wlar bond with my attorney on the proviso that the shed be moved immediately following the spring thaw. I will not accapt your word to do so; tha shad must ba movad or a bond postad. I would much rather you simply remove the trash and the shed without creating any further problems for either of us. If you do so. in a timely manner. I will be completely satisfied. Please call me so that, if possible, we may work this out between ourselves. Yours truly. cc: Joseph F. Schmidt, Attorney at Law Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, City of Orono Building & Zoning Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % H "' VV- o' DATE: March 9, 19^ w ITEM NO « Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA requiring 2 acres in area Review of Pertinent Ordinances • Revised plans per Planning Commission approval Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) A. Area variance Required = 87,120 s.f. Existing = 8,481 s.f. Variance = 78,639 s.f. or 90.2% B.Lot width Required = 200’ At the 75’ setback = 58’ Variance = 142 ’ or 71% At the lakeshore measured in a straight line Variance = 128’ or 64% = 72’ C. West side lot line Required = 10’ Existing = 0 Original proposal = 1’ Amended proposal = 2+ Variance = 9.9’ or 99% D. E. East side lot line Required = 10’ Existing = 11.7’ Original proposal = 11.7’ No variance required Street setback Required = 50’ Existing = 46’ Original = 44.5 ’ Amended proposal = 37.5’ Variance = 12.5’ or 25% Request for Council Action continued Page 2 March 9, 1995 #1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) A. Lakeshore setback from main lake Required = 75’ Existing = 17’ Original proposed = 20’ Amended proposal = 25’ B.Setback from lagoon Existing = 75 + ’ Original proposal =75 + ’ Amended proposal = 70’ Review Exhibit L, strucmre shall not be set in front of an average lakeshore setback line. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 (A) A. 0*75’ setback area = 7,211.6 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 4,585.4 s.f. or 63.58% Original proposal = 3,963.2 s.f. or 54.96% Amended proposal = 3,635.2 s.f. or 50.41% A 65 s.f. reduction in gravel driveway 0-75’ from lagoon setback, 165 s.f. of house relocated within 75-250’ setback area. B. 75-250’ setback area = 1,269.3 s.f. Allowed = 317.33 s.f. Existing = 1,269.3 s.f. or 100% Original proposal = 861.3 s.f. or 67.86% Amended proposal = 775.3 s.f. or 61.08% Amended variance = 457.9 s.f. or 36% (existing * 75%) C. Review of total hardcover on property Total area = 8,481 s.f. Existing = 5,854.7 s.f. or 69% Amended proposal = 4,410,5 s.f. or 52% Request for Council Action continued Page 3 March 9, 1995 #1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West Section 10 03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Structural coverage Total lot area = 8,481 s.f. Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 2,513.8 s.f. or 29.6%* Proposed = 2,345 s.f. or 27.6% ♦Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C-1), the following shall be included in calculations for lot coverage: All roofed structures which extend more than 6 ’ above grade level. Roofed patio area at the lakeside of the residence, the roofed carport and roofed patio area to the street side of residence are all included in strucmral coverage. List of Exhibits Please refer to the staff memo dated February 13, 1995. Additional Exhibits Submitted with Amended Proposal R - Amended Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75’ Setback Area S - Amended Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250’ T - Analysis of Area of Two Story Structure U - Robert Mitchell Letter of 3/6/95 V - Amended Survey Brief Review of Application Please refer to the staff memo of February 13, r >5 and the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting for more detail and background on uiis review. Applicants propose the removal of the existing single story structure and to construct a iwo story strucmre. The struchire will be 38 ’ wid'*, 60’ along the west side and 62 ’ along the east side (additional 2’ needed for garage entrance along street side of residence). Review Exhibit P, there are no height problems. Review Exhibit N, the original proposal presented to the Planning Commission proposed a 20’ setback from the main lake at the southwest comer. The DNR in their review asked that the stmcture be pulled back a minimum of 25’. Review Exhibit U. By moving the structure 5’ to the nonh, there is now a 5’ encroachment within the 75’ setback from the lagoon. Applicant is unable to relocate the stmcmre to the east because of the potential encroachment of the flood plain. Applicant’s attorney, Bob Mitchell, advised that the Bagley residence is located 10+’ from the lot line and that an overhead arbor or roofed stmcture extends from a rear laundry room area to lot line. The existing stmcture is at O’. The original proposal presented to Planning Commission showed a 1’ setback. The amended proposals shows a 2-1-" setback. Request for Council Action continued Page 4 March 9, 1995 #1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdate Road West___________________________ Three of the five member Planning Commisnon found the proposal acceptable, noting the reduction in the footprint from the original structure and the unique hardships of this property based not only on the limited area but the impact of the lakeshore setback on both the north and south. The footprint of the original structure was at 2,513.8 s.f. and the new structure shall be 2,345 s.f. Review Exhibit U. Mr. Mitchell has responded to the minority opinions’ objection to the proposal. The majority opinion of the Planning Commission approved the proposal subject to the structure being moved 5’ further from the main lake and that additional gravel removals should be made to the street side of the residence. Applicant shows a 65 s.f. reduction in the gravel driveway area within the 0-75’ setback area of the lagoon and 86 s.f. reduction in the 75-250 ’ setback area. Planning Commission Recommendation Three of the five members in attendance voted to approve the application. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of that approval recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTLNG A VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2 AND SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 1997 WHEREAS, Jon Lebedoff and Sally Mitchell Lebedoff (hereinafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 1101 Femdale Road West within the City of Orono and legally described as follows; Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 902, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C), Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and 2 and Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a new principal strucmre on a property that is 8,481 s.f. in area where 87,120 s.f. or two acres is required, on a lot that measures 58 ’ at the 75’ setback and IT measured in a straight line at the lakeshore where a 200’ setback would be required. The structure is to be located 2+" from the west side lot line where a 10’ setback is required and structure will be located 37.5’ from the street lot line where a 50 setback is required. Per Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B), the residence structure will be located 25 ’ from the main lake and 70’ from the main lake measured from the lagoon to the north side where a 75’ setback is required; per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area is proposed at 3,635.2 s.f. or 50.41% where none is allowed ^d within the 75-250’ setback area hardcover is proposed at 775.3 s.f. or 61.08% where 25% is allowed and where 100% exists; and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) the new construction will require a structural coverage variance proposed at 2,345 s.f. or 27.6% where 1,500 s.f. is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 5 FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1997. 2. 3. 4. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring two acres in area. The property consists of 8,481 s.f. or .194 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 22, 1995 and recommended approval of the variances as amended, based upon the following unique findings and hardships: f*. The property is .19 acres and subject to 2 acre setback standards. g The substandard parcel is subject to restnetive lakeshore setbacks at both the north and south sides. C D. E. I'he property has been approved for sewer and assessed one sewer umt. The building/structural footprint has been reduced 168.8 s.f. and total hardcover on the property has been reduced from 69% to 52%. The structure cannot be moved closer to east lot line because of the 931.5 flood plain contour. The Orono Code does not allow excavations or filling within the flood plain. E. The proposed improvement would be consistent with the recent improvements of older properties within the West Femdale neighborhood. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable haril..iiip or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial proper^ right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the C.ty. Page 2 of 5 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections listed above to permit the construction of 38.6 ’ X 60’ two story residence and granting approval of a 78,639 s.f. or 90.2% area variance, a lot width variance of both 71% and 64%, west side lot line variance of 9.9+’ or 994.%^ a street setback variance of 12.5 ’ or 25%, lakeshore setback variance at the main lake of 50’ or 75% and 5’ setback variance to the shoreline at the main lake at the lagoon side or 6.6%, hardcover variance within the 0-75’ setback area of 3,635.2 s.f. or 50.4%, a hardcover variance within the 75-250’ setback area of 457.9 s.f. or 36% and a structural coverage variance of 845 s.f. or 9.9%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide detailed grading and drainage plans to ensure there is no impact upon the flood plain of I^e Minnetonka located at the 931.5 elevation. Erosion control shall be maintained on the property until all disturbed areas are restored to natural groundcover. 2. All hardcover scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by applicant presenting a complete application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 1996). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automaiically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foiegoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13 th day of March, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledsed that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 TO: FROM: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:February 13, 1995 SUBJECT: ^1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District; LR-IA, requiring 2 acres in area Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.23. Sub. 6(B) A. Area variance Required Existing Variance = 87.120 s.f. = 8.481 s.f. = 78.639 s.f. or 90.2% B.Lot width Required = 200 ’ At the 75’ setback = 58 ’ Variance = 142 ’ or 71% At the lakeshore measured in a straight line Variance = 128 ’ or 64% = 72’ C. West side lot line Existing = 0 Proposed = 1’ Variance = 9’ or 90% D. East side yard Required = 10’ Existing = 10’ Proposed = 12 ’ No variance required E. Rear setback Required = 50’ Existing = 46’ Proposed = 44.5’ Variance = 5.5% Zoning FUe #1997 February 13, 1995 Page 2 Section 10.22. Subd. 1(B) A. Lakeshore setback from main lake Required = 75' Existing = 17’ Proposed = 20’ DNR required = 25’ B. Setback from the lagoon Existing = 75’ + Proposed = 75’ + Review Exhibit L. struemre shall not be set in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 A. 0-75’ setback area = 7,211.6 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 4,585.4 s.f. or 63.58% Proposed = 3,939.2 s.f. or 54.62% Amended = 3963.2 s.f. or 54.96% B. 75-250’ setback area = 1,269.3 s.f. Existing = 1,269.3 s.f. or 100% Proposed = 861.3 s.f. or 67.86% C. Review of total hardcover on property Total area = 8,481 s.f. Existing = 5,854.7 s.f. or 69% Proposed = 4,800.5 s.f. or 56.6% Amended = 4,824.5 S.f. or 56.8% Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Structural coverage Total lot area = 8,481 s.f. Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 2,513.8 s.f. or 29.6%* Proposed = 2,369.5 s.f. or 27.9% *Per Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C-1) the following shall be included in calculations of lot coverage by structures: 1. All roof struemres which extend more than 6’ above grade level. The roofed patio area at the lakeside of the residence, the roofed carport and roofed patio area to the street side of -esidence are all included in structural coverage. Zoning File §1991 February 13, 1995 Pase 3 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Applicants' Description of Request E - Applicants' Hardship Statement F - Applicants’ Statement of Unique Property Conditions G - Overall Hardcover Comparison Study by Applicants H - Cenificate of Title I - Neighbors' Acknowledgment Forms J - 0-75' Existing and Proposed Hardcover Inventory K - 75-250’ Hardcover Setback Area Existing and Proposed L - Existing Survey M - Existing House Footprint and Hardcover N - Proposed House Footprint and Hardcover O - Floor Plans P - Elevation/Roof Plan Q - Diagram of Roof Improvements within First Floor Level of Existing Residence Description of Request Applicants propose the removal of the existing single story structure and to construct a new two story strucmre to be placed within the approximate footprint of the existing residence. The structure will be 38’ wide and 60’ along the north side and 62 ’ along the south side (additional 2 ’ needed for a garage entrance along the street side of residence). Maximum height of the structure to the top or peak of the roof will be 32 ’. The mean distance to the peak of the roof is 26' + . Review Exhibits M and N, the new structure is pulled back approximately 3’ from the lakeshore at the northwest comer at 20 ’, the original was 17’. The footprint of the new structure will be reduced by 144.3 s.f. (original 2,513.8 s.f., proposed 2,369.5 s.f.). The property is subject to a lakeshore setback on both the west and the east sides. Both the existing and the proposed structure are located out of the 75’ setback from the lagoon side. The property was approved for sewer in the 1980 Femdale Sewer Project. The subject property was connected to sewer in the fall of 1981. The property achieves access via an easement through the property to the immediate north and east, review Exhibit H. One-fourth of the area of the existing footprint are structural improvements with roofed areas, refer to Exhibit Q. Per the definition above, this portion of the existing principal structure must be included as part of the structural footprint. Zoning File ^1997 February 13, 1995 Page 4 In reviewing Exhibits M and N and the hardcover fact sheets, J and K, the applicants propose major reductions of hardcover to’-lly 1,054.2 s.f. or 12.43%. The proposed site plan does not reflect specific removals of exiiting hardcover improvements. It appears that only the stone walkway at the northeast side of the residence will remain along with the gravel parking area and street entrance areas. The elevations reveal no other access doors to north, west or south. Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibits E and F. applicants ’ Statement of Hardship and unusual property conditions, Issues for Consideration 1. 2. 3. As already noted above, total hardcover on the property has been reduced from 69% to 56.^%. Is the proposal too ambitious for the severely limited property? Should residence be relocated more to the south to minimize substandard setback at north lot line?----Should building footprint be reduced? Now that a new structure is to be rebuil^on property, should structure be pulled further away from main lake to the4&rf^ - Refer to survey. Exhibit L, and still maintain 75’ setback from lagoon? 4,Review Exhibit P, the elevations of the residence reveal no additional access doors which may not be realistic or practical. Many lakeshore owners appreciate a direct access to lake from their lakeside. Applicants should be asked to respond to this issue. 5.A well was installed on this property in 1989 but has not been located on the survey. Applicants should be aware if there is a need to install new well if house is to be relocated. Ceil Strauss of the DNR has been sent the information in the variance packet and will be asked to comment. Staff will report on her final comments at your meeting. #1CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPUCATI Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATIOr (1, fi 'I 7.• f. l- ♦ .• ! . ■ U. ' '• « « IC* . -. . ■' • ’ ■ ’ t — L, r r JL *. L'vV mm* ; 1 U. • . I i ! U i. *. V • \ V w V w' ■ V V rn Tn:.....' t i^u* • j'*' * . . ^ ^ ; ' . .* ■ » Tw*;. ; wi.' w. w' i. 'A M W'A / v u* ' ’ t "* Site Address 1101 West Ferndale Road, Wavzata, MN 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 02-1 17-2.^-43-0020 . . . •• .• ___1___I ^Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired December 1954 ________________(monthy^ear) I (do) (do not ) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X______residential___ 2Loning District: LRl A ___________________ other (specify) APPLICANT Name: Jon and Sallv Mitchell Lebedotf Address: 1915 Irving Ave. S._________ Phone (home) f6121 377-.1272 Phone (work) _____3^^- I *170 City: Minneapolis. MN Zip: 55403 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name: Estate of Rol^rt G. Mitchell Address: c/o Robert G. Mitchell. Jr. Lindquist & Vennum_____ Phone (home) (6121 473-1042 Phone (work) (6121 371-3262 City: Minneapolis. MN Zip: 55402 42(K) IDS Center DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Construction Cost SJOOJIOO Describe request in detail: (See attached)______________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback:Front Side Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify):. IIARDSHIP/DESCRIPnON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (see attached!_____________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1 Jl, f \ / < ^ / ^ . /.*• e; -.4'. .* /f 1. 2. 3. 4. All nf the foUowing information must be subniirted bv the appUcaripn deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete ✓ Completed Application Form ^ "^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obtam this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). IT Cenificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur\^eyor) and melude hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S/i .x 11 for Top'oeraplhc sur^•ev (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade — are proposed. In Edition, provide one (1) copy x 11 " for reproduction ✓ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 ^ ✓ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an mterest m the nroperry. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Please remember that voue variance apniiraiinn is not complete if the ahoye information has not been mcluded. Tte tp’pl^^ Lre^'^^^^ provide all information required or requested Admi^strator. agrees to pay additional fees (staff me not and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and ceitifies that the informauon supplied is Applicant’s Signanire ' fi— L-4-»y . Date —/ ~ S. ^ ^ . 0. 6. 7. 8. 9. members for purposM^^^ugesdptio^and renfica^oi^^^^^ Owner's Signature By ^ • Date ' ^ ^ — Applicant must have all submittals into thiTcity offices 25 days before the Planning Co^sion mST Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of «ch mon*^ AppSSnta ■»-« b* ^ ““eduled review meetings of the this change prior to the meeting. 8 ____ / » APPWH ORIGINAL \ TIUC1 * r 06) \ '» t 09/ ^ \ Jr* X fAAl or I < »‘*'y Ijir LOT 9 (23) (19) R L S KO eo2 _ R L $ MO Ufa _ 8 (3) •''•'b* (?l) <) ^66*»’«« -,.»/ ■‘-:66*» . ^ ''o-ifAHtor 'i/'''"*'~'Uc!*" fie.2 1 12 (24) fl / A •• 3/»tV*‘. C browns (<989 BAY) PHOTO) APfW* ilST Cl>€ or LOT 13 ko^tm smo^ coTTAa tens ACCC«01NG TO KECOAO riAT s. i'* 02-II7-Z5VJ i*rjn i^OVT LOT ? RUN DATE 01/11/95. BATCH 500DROP AOOR OWCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOORt • PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ' I . •» > ■! ■ • • 1 1 *< • ^ . . •• 3B 02-117-23 43 001« 01105 FERNOALE RO N RALPH C BAGLEY RALPH C BAGLEY 1105 FERNDALE RO M . HAYZATA MN 55391 3B 02-117-23 43 0023 01095 ^ FERNOALE RO N B A R FOK B C A KATHERINE H FOX 1095 N FERNOALE RO NAYZATA HN 55391 :• • •. , . • » 'V. ■ ,• • / .• . « .. . * . t ' ‘ ■# . '** ■» .* • •• 1 . i • • '•f. . ' • ♦. • *4 • . ? • ' •« , •. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMNERS LIST0^-117-23 43 0019 OwjSB AOORESS UNASSI^O RALPH C BAGLEY RALPH C BAGLEY 1105 FERNOALE RO H NAYZATA m 55391 mm > r:. . V. • * *. ... * , ..V • r \ •’ . ' ’ Vt ' i'.'i ■■ i • • * * .. /-N /-• • f •• * •* '• .• •• TOTAL BATCH 504 00004 REPORT NO* PI435401 PAGE 17 •«* • »•30 02-117-23 43 0020 01101 FERNOALE RO H ROBERT G MITCHELL ROBERT G MITCHELL 1101 N FERNOALE RO NAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPkESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS OATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE ANO BELIEF. ^ DATE 0 ••. • . r t. •» ■r,‘i-'.••••l.l'’ '(»• 'J X.•"i '< * t‘ 1 T, A • > , il, 'i■ -k ‘» 1' '#• 1 * : •V ■ 0-f .VI - • ■ / f;;JA . : ';M f ‘ • ^ V ;33 li i -1;"■fife • V- I •:9::v>’ ’.iiL • '* • K ^ :v/ .•'/ T C‘* ■ f »•. T loiO I 1?’ * V • : . ./At..: i kx i f. I--*. D Description of Request Demolish existing house and build new two-story dwelling on existing foundation, except as noted on the survey. The variances applied for are necessary to build the new house requested by the Applicants. The proposed new house hardcover is 2369.5 square feet vs. 2513.8 square feet hardcover for the existing house (including canopy over front porch). The hardcover reduction for the new house is 144.3 feet (-5.7%). The roof line or canopy of the new house is 3.2 feet further back from Lake Minnetonka and the house remains more than 75 feet from the lagoon. There is a slight foundation line change on the driveway side for the garage. Two foundation jogs on the sides are being removed, in effect increasing the side lot setbacks. There will be removal of existing hardcover including portions of gravel driveway, sidewalk, front canopy, wood steps and patio block. The proposed new house is a two-story house to replace a one-story house to have adequate space for a family of two adults and two children (ages 11 and 14). The height of the house is 7’9'' under the Orono height limit of 30 feet for a pitched roof, being 22 ’3" at the measuring point. In 1989, while Mr. Mitchell was living, a similar proposal was made. At that time, Ralph Bagley, the neighbor to the west, requested that some additional landscaping be done between the two houses. That additional landscaping was installed. In addition, the overhead power lines were placed underground to each of the two houses. The applicants know of no issues pending regarding any other neighbors. The hardship is as stated below. IX Hardship 1. Per the January 18. 1995 survey and hardcover computations (2 pages) attached, the present hardcover on the site is 5854.7 square feet. The existing house ic without any basement or attic storage area and only has a one car carport. The lot is 8480.9 square feet in size. 2. The applicants can. and will if the building permit Is granted, reduce the existing hardcover from 5854.7 square feet (5854.7 / 8480.9 = 69.03%) to 4800..5 square feet (4800.5 / 8480.9 = 56.60%), a reduction of 1054.2 square feet of hardcover (-12.43%) This will be accomplished by removing certain gravel driveway areas and walkways on the westerly, southerly and easterly sides of the site, and removing sidewalks, wood steps, patio block and some front canopy, and replacing the same with grass. 3. The neighbors on either side of this site, as well as other neighbors along this area of West Ferndale Road, have in the past few years made various changes, alterations, and additions to their properties in efforts to increase liveability. It is our understanding that when the city granted such requests, the test applied was minimal increases in hardcover and minimal reductions in required setbacks, or better. On the M'tchell site there would be a 1054.2 square foot reduction in hardcover and a slight increase in the size of the existing side setbacks in the process creating a more liveable dwelling. Unusual Property Conditions 1. 2. 3. 4. Area of small, old lots. Lake surrounds Bagley and Mitchell houses virtually on 3 sides. Land is low lying, sewered. New water well. The neighborhood houses have been gradually upgraded over the years by each house having been improved similarly. This is the last house in the immediate area to need ir. iprovement. 5 HARDCOVER (SQ. fJ.\ Existing House House and CanoDV Other Hardcover Total Hardcover 2513.8 +2940.9 5854.7 ProDosed !-louse House Other Total INo CanoDvl Hardcover Hardcover 2369.5 +2341.0 4800.5 M. o ' as/District Court No.(s) Trnnnfrr from No.<s> Originrilly registered Volume<s) 07A9 Page(s) 02276A5 123780A268A812/31/5A STATE of HINNESOTAt COUNTY of HENNEPIN. REGISTRATION This Is to certify that: Robert O. Mitchell of 1101 West Ferndnle Rood. City of Woy7otn. County of Henneplnt State of Minnesota is(are) now the owner(s) of nn estate In fee simple of and In the following described land situated In the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, to wits Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 902# flies of Registrar of Titles# County of Hennepin Subject to the encumbrances, liens and Interest noted by the memorial underwritten or endorsed hereoni and subject to the following rights or encumbrence?; subsisting, as provided In the twenty-fourth section of **An act concerning the registration of leond and the title thereto*^ of the General laws of the State of Hlnnesot) for the year 1905. . nd the amendments thereof, namelys 1. Liens, claims or rights arising under the laws or the constitution of the United States# which the statutes of this state cannot require to appear of record. 2. The lien of any tax or special assessment for which the land has not been sold at the date of the certificate of title. ^ • 3« Any lease for a period not exceeding three years. wi>en there Is actual occupation of the premises under the lease. * ' ‘ 4. All rights In public highways upon the land. 5. Such right of appeal or right to appear and contest the application as Is allowed by law. . 6. The rights of any person In possession under deed or contract for deed from the owner of the certificate of title. That the said Robert G. Mitchell Is of the age of 72 years. Is unmarried and Is under nd ♦ disability. . ‘ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF# 1 ha^e hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of my office THIS FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER 1982 R. DAN CARLSON •• Registrar of Titles# In and for the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. . '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DEPUTY MEMORIAL OF ESTATES. EASEMENTS OR CHARGES ON THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE HERETO ATTACHED DOCUMENT NUMBER KIND OF INSTRUMENT DATE OF INSTRUMENT DATE OF REGISTRATION Mo.Day Year Mo.Day Year Hour 632284 Warranty Deed Mar 2 1960 Jul 25 19iV0 On other land Mar 25 1971 02<05 08 : 00 AMOUNT Tract A. RLS RUNNING IN FAVOR OF Robert C. Carter & Georgia K. Carter, his luP. as jt tenants Granting easements for driveway purposes over pt of Tract A. R. L. S. No. A41 & full riparian rights & rights No 902 In favor of Tract B. R. L. S. No. 902 (See Inst) 102 87A081 Order of May 9 1967 1 May 10 1967 10:15 1 Court On other Directing that the land desc of the second easement created SIGNATURE OF DEPUTY REGISTRAR COG (TURN PAGE) NO. 6287S0 ■m■mm.tW mn I K J COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA IR A CONDITION OF THt l* - • . \ *' . 4. •• - . •?’ •• 7 — - f^-V * ^#1 Adjacent Property OwneiT^knoyd^gemat Fortn'-- • / . ., ^ ^ -(icl¥'’2) ?^.C. & Ka^^*^r^ne M. Fox *f4 3 0 [ohar nainc(s)i 1095 W Fernt^ale Rd, Wavzata^ m 55391 [phn: address] ........ “SS.T^?. “I!!!!.'““at M Fornrale ?.d ^150 rctc.^^a 10 as i-i^u i.z 2“S declare approval or disapproval ----nt plans and ±at the proposed neighbor’s Council Lhat i (we) xaxiare) aware of the unprov.....ni pi project or use requires Council approval. 7«^3^vJa ^ Property Owner b.C. Fox Date t ^ / A /f;. c Property Owner Katherine M. Fox Date/ *ai»**«i*»»»»**’ • •« «•> . • .. ■* ♦ • .* * - • • • , * j*. • •• -> I Le6£.Daff HARriCO\’ER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)75*250’25-500’500-1000’ EXISTING hardcover IN ZONE A. House 2.7 //.-t Le&g’Ji /.^.4 X X X Vuidi s.l 3C.O B, Garage 7 ~£X C. Driveway X X D. SidewaJk E. Pfttte^ctrie /.7 X X z // ^X X 4- 4<a.<£-P- haB6Kspc Umicilairr Bv-Phatie <r./ ^. / X X X J’<£3 G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY .AREA IN ZONE A ^SgS.4. * B 7J//. X 100 PROPOSED HARDCO^TR IN ZONE A. House _______ Lecgth H X X Wkilh 7.C7 B. Ga.-ge C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk i T»*i t X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total 01 ZONE ^ , ,oo /<t. 3 //3y. o l^^9.Z n^cf S.F. S.F. /oz./ ^Z4-. o S.F. S.F. \ ZIS’3 f ■ ■ 3^./ \93.o S.F. ; ) S.F^ ; i) S.F. S.F. S.F. ■■■ ) ^4., 7 S.F. 1.. S.F. 7ZNU S.F. % A B i>3. 5*. I54^-S fS3.4- 3!o _ S F. \ S.F. / I S.F. / 7 0/6. S.F. S.F. /4>g/ G S.F. S.F. S.F. 17.6., e> S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9 • S.F. 7Z//.<g» S.F. A B hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CKCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING hardcover IN ZONE A. House Lec{;2l X X X y^OOo B. Gmec ^ C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk ^•4 X X ;. PatioZD^ok X X F. LaDdseop#3-f WudcrtJi By G. Other X X X .TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^ZC^.3 + B . PROPOSED HARDCO^TR IN ZONE A. House ^^/z._____ Lxogth z Z2. X X X B. Garage C. Drivewaj X X D. Sidewalk • 3 X X E. Patro/Decic X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other 75-250J 25-500’500-1000' Widtii 3^ /• 7 M.Z //. 5' //.5 JZA9.3 X 100 Width Z-^7 total hardcover in zone total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B 3 xlOO 13 343^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. I4h7 8>49 S.F. S.F. Z3.0 S.F. S.F 39-S J J. o 4>9.o S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /2^9.3 S.F. ^ S.F. /£>£>________% BIO S.F. 5.3 44- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 41^.0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. t S.F. SU\. 3 S.F. S.F. ) ‘1 * - •i A B A B HARDCOVER SURVEY FORSALLY MITCHELL LEBEDOFF AND JON LEBEDOFFOF TRACT S. R L. S. NO. t02 HCNNCFIN COUNTY. MINNCf 7TA i / c '* ) e tyf r*;» IlMS «%<••*•••• 01 f»Hl •. U**«r *»*. Rf litiM. €•«•«» •* iuHiurrS |Ul«« •»«r*«#****. II F**! M»F«»I !••••• *•! mart IRRTRVRRRMI t RMYtMRRRRtl. I U*« R*Ylt' »»R^ *'• AEtM VRR* •• •!*•••« ••t«R. l«^1A\ OS ■i VMlIN IIAIl ISMSTIHIS — — • ..,fc .M. ^ •. •«.«#> ««.<«•««i«»M (niii\ cS; (.i;t>\it|K(. l\i HAROCOVtR tURVtV FOR SALLY MITCHELL LEBEDOF^ AND JON LEBEDOFF Of TiucT 0. PU-t. Na tea HCNNCPtN COUNTY, lOHIIttOTA •CMS o*n IHVlMDi mND ....i 4 ■ ^ J . !s' r^-pp-^MT euev/^Tig^M 1*2^ n*» rat rr. .FT. iFt l^K in LUnDGRCnBROSrsg^ ^Ev. /-af-ts mONtlttSt m-QSI MS I.««riAT» tLVIk lMailfA.IM SMSI L^4Wt2?T=F LOT OOVWtOFMWilT LINDQUIST & VENNUM p.l.l.p. A ttorneys A t La \n ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR 612-371-3262 4200 IDS C cntcn 80 South Ejohth Street MiNNEAPOUs. Mmmesota 55402*2205 Telephone 612-371*3211 Fax ; 612-371*3207 In D enver Unoouist .VEnnum IC hrstensen RUL.R 600 17tn Street . Sum 2125 D enver . C olorado 802C2 * 5401 Telephone 303*573*5900 March 6, 1995 :MAK. t;i995 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Jc n and Sally Mitchell Lebedoff Zoning File #1997 Dear Jeanne: Pursuant to the comments at the Planning Commission meeting held on February 22, 1995, I submit some additional materials. First I enclose two sets of the Lundgren Bros, building plans with a sheet attached showing the square footages for living spaces, mechanical and storage spaces, and "other” being only the first floor porch and the second floor sundeck immediately above it. From that data one can see that the square footage of living space in this dwelling is only 2,851 square feet. That is the size of a 3-bedroom townhouse and not more. The balance of the space relates to mechanical and storage (including garage) which, without a basement or an attic, must all be within the two existing floors. I hope this gives a better explanation of the relative size of this dwelling vis-a- vis the comments that it is too large. In relation to other houses in the neighborhood it is clearly as small a house as a family could reasonably be expected to live in. Second, I enclose a new site plan drawing and hardcover computation from Mark Gronberg showing the house relocated such that it is 25' from Lake Minnetonka and showing additional green 'area~ofT'tHe''sopther 1 y side of the driveway adjacent to the Fox property. This further decreases the existing hardcover and increases the green area. Third, I have not yet been able to talk to Ceil Strauss about her requirement of placing the house 25' back from Lake Minnetonka. I still hope to do so, but in all events we would like to be on the Orono City Council meeting scheduled for March 13, 1995. Lc NDQUIST & VENNUM pi_l.p. March S, 1995 Page 2 If you have any questions about these submittals, please contact me at 371-3262. Thank you. Very truly yours, LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. RGM/ssc ^-jl' ' - X ■'fclltrawtvViL’i^ - f3K\ ■*?i- • 5 ■mm. II ^Jvi'- riub^ijv ^ , hardcover calculation worksheet RCLE ONE) 75-250 ’ •Ki -1 - 25-500*500-1000' F7q<rrTNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Z»7 Leofth /4-.^ it.c & B. Garage 2 X X X -» Widl]l 6-1 30.0 Z4-.i C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk E. Paiie/Deek' 4.A- 2.7 X X ZiZ Sz X X Z4-.Z lA'. A' baadeeape UuJi'.i'linr By-Ptetie Z./ A. / X X X SO G. Other • • ' TOTAL H ■ '^Jbr^JVtR LN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE j A proposed HARDCO ^T’R in zone A. House ?g-fel Leogch X X X Width 7.^*7 B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X 2-/d'-7/ SrfA E. Patio/Deck __X X f. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other X 100 total HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PR^g^l^^ ^ 3 ■ X 100 a . .. ’ 3 S.F. , B • i ; //^S.F. s J/j&.o S.F. ss f^9.Z S.F. • S.F. n^e?S.F. S S.F. to 2./ t36.o S.F. a tZ ^ _S.F. 27^.3 •« • • S.F. »« 4. /S.F. S.F. tgs.^S.F. J=S S.F. a 3^, 7 S.F. S.F. wm 72//-4.S.F. S3 i^3« 52 % 154^.S S.F. - : S.F. S.F. -a » 2.S.F. a /AS/. 2>S.F? a,d’.r s[g; • 1 '"■‘’iK s-S.F. ■ ; : 2V.<?S.F. . , *S.F. •i• •« 1 • S.F.‘ 1 S.F. S.F. 1 • • •S.F. • 3 c? S- Z • # 1 P S.F. 7Ztf .6^S.F. % A B 0 7i 7 hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ FYTSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House __ * Uofth X X X ^TSP3 B. garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk /»7 ________ E. F. LanitiMpt l^fudertaiiii By PiMtit G. Other X X X X X X X X X proposed TTARDCQVE R in ZONE A. House ^^ Leogtii B. Garage C. Dnveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X 1----------- G. Other X X X X X X X X X 75-250]25-500' Widib 3.^ /. 7 //. 5' //.5 .TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ,, ^ ^ - * + B Width total HARDCCVTR in zone total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A yj*-1— X 100 • ••• 500-1000 ’ B ^ X100 " 13 - S.F. s i'S.T. as S.F. S.F. a « Zt,tf S-F- S.F. a S.F. I4U7 S.F. a 8.4>S.F. es t « ' tn,o S.F. a S.F. S.F. a 33. O S.F. a &^.o S.F. i 1 i S.F. ' i /Z4.9.3 S.F. : • /2^,4y3 S.F. a % S8i ; » • ~3Tf 3 S.F. #7^ • • • 477 zs "jo •7 A B S.F. S.F. S.F.., S.F. • c FsJ; S.F. S.F. j;p; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. # • I 77T, 3 ..S.F. •/ic^.3 _S.F. A B I tf-A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION - DATE: March'7, 19« % yc ITEM NO "P.rf Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1998 Craig Widclund, 3780 Bayside Road - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B) - Lot area and lot width variances. A. Lot area Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 65.560 s.f. or 1.51 acres (17,582 s.f. or .4 acres of wet. Per Section 10.55, Subd. 15(A-2), wetland areas can be credited for sewered properties) Variance = 21,560 s.f. or .49 acres or 24.7% B. C. Lot width Required = Existing = Variance = 200’ 149 ’ 51 ’ or 25.5% Applicant had originally proposed a front streel/street setback variance to the Planning Commission but amended application to exclude the request for the front setback variance. The Planning Commission ’s recommendation dealt only with the lot area and lot width variance. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Addendum E - Topographic Map/2’ Contours F - Neighboring Property Owners’ Acknowledgment Forms G * Burgers Bayside Second Addition Plat - Location of Access Easement H - Deed Recognizing Access Easement I - Existing Site Plan Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 March 7, 1995 Zoning File #1998 ______ J - Property to South ’s Survey (Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road) K - Staff Sketch L - Elevations M - Floor Plan N - Revised Plan O - Gardiner Letter Description of Request The applicant proposes the removal of the existing structure and to rebuild a new residence with attached garage requiring area and width variances as set forth above. Applicant’s application originally involved a request for a front street setback variance but chose to amend the application before the Planning Commission when it appeared that the setback variance would be denied. Review Exhibit N, applicant has presented a revised proposal showing the house meeting all required setbacks of the LR-IA Zoning District. The property was served with sewer with the recent sewering of Stubbs Bay area. The existing residence is currently not connected to sewer but has been assessed one sewer unit. Municipal sewer lines are located within the utility easements within a 16‘/2’ utility easement along the south lot line of Lot 2, Burgers Bayside Second Addition (refer to Exhibit G). Lot 52 of Auditor ’s Subdivision No. 203 was created in October of 1928. The property achieves access via a nonexclusive 16'/^’ easement located within the same area of the municipal easement for sewer at the south lot line of Lot 2, Burgers Bayside Addition. Review Exhibits B, J and N, the property owners to the immediate south advised that the existing curb cut at Bayside servmjg both residences intersects their property. They have asked that construction vehicles not use this portion of the drive. Applicants shall develop a curb cut within their legal access corridor. Statement of Hardship 1. 2. 3. 4. The house has existed on this site for over sixty years. The property was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property without need for setback variances. The property is located within the 250-500’ setback zone from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19,668 s.f. of hardcover improvements. Planning Commission Recommendation Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 March 7, 1995 Zoning File #1998 Planning Commission Recomn.endation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the lot area and lot width variance to permit new residential construction on the 1.51 acre property subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. New residence strucnire must be connected to sewer. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans for walkout design with application for building permit. 3.Applicant shall install curb cut within the legal 16W wide access at Bayside Road. Applicant is further advised to contact Hennepin County DOT for the necessary permits for work within the right-of-way. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution based on the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE #1908 WHEREAS, Craig Wicklund (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 3780 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 52, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of a new p^ipal stracture on a property that consists of 65,560 s.f. or 1.51 acres where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres is required and on a lot that measures a 149 ’ at the 50’ (ront street setback where a 200 width is required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1998. The property is located in the LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 22,1995, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. The house has existed on this site for over sixty years. Page 1 of 5 B C. D. The propert)’ was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property meeting all setback and hardcover requirements of the LR-IA Zoning District. The property is located within the 250-500’ setback zone from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19,668 s.f. or hardcover improvements. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivisions 6(B) to^rmit construction of a new principal structure granting an area variance of 21,560 s.f. or 24.7% and a lot width variance of 51 ’ or 25.5%, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. New residence structure shall be served by an approved sewer srub available to the south of the property. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans tor walkout design residence with application for building permit. Applicant shall install a new curb cut at Bayside Road in order to not encroach upon the property located at 3770 Bayside Road. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heir, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 1995 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared----------^^ known to me to be the person(s) descnbed m and who executed the foregoing instrument, a^cknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public withinand for said county. pcrsonfs) described in and who execul5 the foregoing instiument. andTcknowIedged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 To:Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Date:February 10, 1995 Subject: #1998 Craig Wicklund, 3780 Bayside Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Area, lot width and front setback variances. A.Lot area Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 65,560 s.f. or 1.51 acres (17,582 s.f. or .4 acres of wet. Per Section 10.55, Subd. 15 (A) (2), wetland areas can be credited for sewered properties.) Variance = 21,560 s.f. or .49 acres B Lot width Required = Existing = Variance = 200’ 149’ 51’ or 25.5% C.Front setback Required = 50’ Existing = 46 ’ Proposed = 26 ’ Variance = 24 ’ or 48% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Addendum E - Topographic Map-2 ’ Contours Neichboring Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form G - Burgers Bayside Second Addition Plat-Location of Access Easement H - I - J - K L I^ed Recognizing Access Easement Plan Property to South ’s Survey (Gardiner) Staff Sketch Elevations M - Floor Plan Zoning File #1998 Febmar>’ 10, 1995 Page 2 Description of Request Lot 52 was part of a larger parcel acquired by the current owne'j in 1911 (refer to Exhibit H) Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 was filed in October of 1928. An easement described as a rod wide (16'/2*) was created in 1911 over the Burger property at the time the larger parcel was created. The easement in later years served not only the Anderson parcel but the former Miner residence on Lot 53 of that same Auditor ’s Subdivision. The same non exclusive easement continues to serve the Anderson property. There is some controvei^ as to whether the deed for Lot 52 was updated to reflect right to the use of the easement. There is nothing to suggest in the original Deed that the access easement was an exclusive easement and that when Auditor ’s Subdivision No. 203 was approvedXot 52 would not be made deliberately landlocked. Refer to Exhibits B and .?. The owner of the property to the immediate south has installed a garage within a 30 ’ public alley to the south. Landmark Drive does not abut the property. The only available access to this site is via the 16'/i ’ wide easement. The property was served with sewer with the recent sewering of the Stubbs Bay area. The existing residence is currently not connected to sewer but has been assessed one sewer umt. Municipal sewer lines are located within the utility easement along that same 16 h comdor of Lot 2, Burgers Bay side Second Addition (refer to Exhibit G). It is the intention of the applicant to take down the existing strucmres airf rebuild a new residence with attached garage requiring area and width variances. Refer to Exhibit D, appljcant claims certain hardships with relocating a new residence structure meeting the required 50 front setback. Statement of Hardship Applicant’s addendum notes the following hardships: 1. Applicant claims existing house and proposed house will be located on a Mmral knoll defined at the 942 ’ and 940 ’ elevations. If the house was located further back on lot, it would sit much lower and based on the walkout design may create water problems for new residence. The well is located right in the central portion of the building envelope. The well was installed in 1989 and applicant wishes to continue use of well. 2. Placement of garage and storage area reduces length of driveway and minimizes hardcover. Allowing structure to be placed more to the south will save two mamre trees on property. Impact of residence being placed 26 ’ from south lot line is mimmize by existing growth of trees and shrubs along the south lot line of the property. 3. 4. Zoning File #1998 February 10, 1995 Page 3 Staff would add the following for the area and lot width variance: 1. 2. 3. 4. The house has existed on this site for over 50 years. The property was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. Refer to Exhibit K. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property. The property is located within 250-500' of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19.668 s.f. of hardcover improvements. Issues for Consideration 1. /it the time a property is : j be completely redeveloped, is it appropriate to consider location of an existing well as a reason for granting setback variances? Refer to Exhibit K. The house can be readjusted to meet the 50’ setback and also not be forced into the northern tree line. It will line up approximately with the rear of the existing detached garage. 2. Hardcover does not appear to be a problem for this property and should not be used as a reason for granting a setback variance for new construction. 3. Upon your site inspection, review the elevations to the rear of the detached garage. Is there adequate room to create a walkout and also minimize any tree removal to the north? Note the drainageway within the tree line that runs from the west to the east property line. 4. The house has been designed to take advantage of lakeviews to the southeast. Can this be achieved if house is moved 24’ to the northeast? 5. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Option.s of Action Approval as proposed if members feel applicant has demonstrated suitable hardships for the granting of a front setback variance, OR Partial approval granting the area and lot width variance but requiring that structure be placed at the conforming setbacks. Zoning File #1998 February 10, 1995 Page 4 Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: 1. New structure must be connected to sewer. 2. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans for walkout design with application for building permit. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from jriginal application) Variance for non-conforming structures $2 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) LL f;....' \ (I ‘O PROPERTY EVFORMATION \ . Site Address 7 ^ 0 (Og.^S i de----fsi* ----r------------ Property Identification Number (P.I.D^ <i.-\-c \ —tJ' Attach legal description to application if not included on r^uired survey. - " Date Propem' Acquired (llos —(mdnth/year) w it W — -I -2 u “ “ J. L'Z Date rropem' Acquu^ea i o^ i ja-1 ^ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: n( residential ___other (specify) Zoning District;___________________________________ , u: i u a 1i' J. APPLICANT Phone (home) V7 /-. 75^7 __ Name rr~r,:u \l? : d^l u.^ <i ,____,___ Phone(work)^7^ - ?o fe^---- Address: ^ o 4d^Vxjur odi City: — OWNER (if different than applicmi) Phone(home) ^3 - f3 ----- Name ^~T~<3. tirS 6 r^_____Phone (work)—— Address: ^4.55" HSL City: 4^rvj^ / />7f?-Zip: J .4i_ DESCRIPTION OF REQLTST Estimated Consmiciion Cost fH O ^000^2 ^ Describe request in detail: i r«?-irYio i« g_ \ ^ < n —r.\/i vt *aFr.. r -U rJ dv^j c f>___I>fT <^crC-------tuai------------------------------------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED >4 Lot Area _Lot Width ^ Setback: JC Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or ^usual property conditions preventmg .-r^mnliQnce with Zoning Code requirements: N ^ ^ c ax -s r^c>>c r/ —2J2---ac ^ o , 0c^.ir , g ir\g. < compliance with Zoning Code requirements------------------------ „ X.,.A. s<_l- (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1. 2. 3. 4. required submittals All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in orde j: for vour application to be considered complete: Completed Application Form ........... — Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtam this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). ----Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur/eyor) and include hardcover — calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/^" x IT for Topoeraphic .survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade — are proposed. In addition, provide one U) copy 8*/2" x 11" for repu^ucuon Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 9 A x 11 )• ----List of the iegal names (include marital status) of all persons with an mterest in the propertv TWs would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). __As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Aoplic^nt end Property Owner must sign this application. Please 5!2SU: nr,nlie.-.tion is not cor.m lete if the above infonfialion has ntH been iptlpded. m*appli^ hereS^agreefro provide ali information required or requested by the Zoning ^wLator agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee pa^c™) “cotlsutom expends incurred in review ofjbis application and certtftes that the information supplied is ifu^ and correct, to ^fi^/best 9T his/her knowledge. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. / DateApplicant’s Signature Thl^^tr^her^^y and agrees to this application and furtlier auUwrizcs reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, constants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of ii^^^onpdveri^^on of this request. owner's Signam^^:^::s^S2i^^^^=^ Applicant must hav/all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning ComimMion Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Mraday of each mon^_ ADPlicants must be present at all scheduled review meetmgs of the Plaiuuog Cominiss Md Council. If an applicant is unable to auend a scheduled meeting, “f to have an authorized agent auend in your place and to advise the Butldmg & Zonmg Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 • • •V .1 «- ;?“• • i k.** »■ > • 1* *• ••.•'* *'• ••. *: - • 1'^ • • *•'• •k 3i*K #*•- >»*4 .j. ^ OAH 01/27/W 0?^,r »ATCH 505 ’iv^h ww AOOR -OltKR NAME' ■ TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR** *'=S O-0 " < •4 * t^^S^PROP AOOR ■. U/OHNER NAME . v »V TAXPAYER Ui-jiNAME/AOOR ^ • « . r*. . Z <>4 PROP ADOR* OKNCR NAME ^ • TAXPAYER ^v‘ NAME/ADDR ‘^V‘f f T't*- • • y \ '■ * * ,'■ PRjP AOOR . OHNER NAME :,TAXPAYER • . ; ■' ' NAME/AOOR O . • * PROP AOOR U"... v«i HENNEPIN i : - . OHNER NAME \ Itaxpayeh *v NAHE/ADDR ^ r • « ” ;. . ’-PROP AOOR • • OHNER NAME .'"V.TAXPAYER (. NAME/AOOl SO 05-117-2S 21 0005 0S7O0 BAYSXOE RO HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3700 OAYSIDE RO L0N6 LAKE MN 55354 SO 05-117-2S 21 0020 0S750 BAYSIOE RO JOHN A MARY JANE BURGER CHRISTINE S GARY VALERIUS 3750 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE Itl 55S56 SO 05*117-23 22 0013 00040 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO O.S PERKINS « P M PERKINS DANIEL S • PATRICE M PERKINS 55 LANDMARK OR ORONO MN 55356 SB 05-117-23 23 0037 00255 LANDMARK OR HARK L t KARENA S CASEY MARK L « KARENA S CASEY 4320 ENCHANTED DR MOUND MN 55364 30 05-117-23 24 0102 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 505 00015 COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY QNNERS LIST36 05-117-23 21 0016 03700 BAYSIOE RO J B MAUS A J E MAUS ■ JAMES B A JOAN E MAUS 3700 BAYSIOE RO ' LONG LAKE FBI 55356 ■ 38 05-117-23 22 0010 00055 LANDMARK OR >it* 0 S PERKINS A P M PERKINS * . DANIEL S A PATRICE M PERKUG 55 LANDMARK OR ORONO MN 55356 . report no. PI4SS401 PAGE 14 • > F- U 1* . {• , r ,. •- » f 38 05-117-23 22 0014 00185 LANDMARK OR R F A K A KYLE RICHARD F A KATHLEEN A KYLE 1160 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0100 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIOE RO LONG I LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0103 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 !!/ *; M fi 4 . * \ i I - . ^ / **. * ;V . : 5 . I r. / * I J<.. 38 05-117-2S 21 OOlf 00050 LANDMARK DR JAMES A PATRICIA TOOO JAMES A PATRICIA TOOO 169 MEADOH U LONG LAKE Ft4 55356 38 05-117-23 22 0011. 00175 LANDMARK OR L C HARREN A J H HARREN LEE C A JUUE M HARREN ' 175 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 I 38 05-117-23 23 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LANDMARK OR HOMEOItCRS ASSOC LANDMARK DR NOMEOMCRS ASSOC C/0 LEE C HARREN 175 LANDMARK OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0101 03770 BAYSIOE RO SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN S5S56 3B 05-117-23 24 0111 03775 BAYSIOE RO G R A CE ROHLETTE GERALD L ROHLETTE 3775 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE (M 55356 f •• ; I- •»» J !■ i « •• • • u• . “S-J.-ir •Jf' .'V-•; -^ * f V . ;, - ’,•* ^ * i V '.•i.t W : Hr * • • i ■ ’ .** « •' sj[ ... ^ •'. P • C i » •i . *''•; I • ;8»l. w r r.«*>*M*? • ‘ ’ • . .V . • ‘ wr 'v ‘fl,’; ■■'■■.>'■»•*.-I- *.r:z' r* I . ’• I. i ,* « '• , I t . * 7 ••••*' : .ti *. r. ;.-‘ * • r •» * * ‘ ;• ». I • * j . . * is ‘ ’r. • • • . .. <. ' * . * A * ' • o • V .V ~ .• * ► *1 ^-f y RUN DATE 01/27/95»■>>, ;v- •Q BATCH 505S’•’• ■• •: 'V •QJ : ■ ■ f *5 V v : .♦: ' “r’-J 'V*: •, • * ■iVt 4 * >* n\ • i* HENNEPIN COl^n i TTOPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPER!^ OHNEP"^ UST %REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 15 • 9 0 *A• i % •» i1 .;' * *v^' .• ' **ll ^ * ' •* V'*** I'* • • >^ « 5. ^ :i, ^Vl.v- •••4. 7- * 'i ■* ' A *. ■ • ’• ••‘": vv: v r- V../- Y* **i • * * * • •• *» : 5 > ‘ i ’;, *» *. ;, I ! :i , f* S uV'i". ' i «*r; f. U“V ’■ :'l •. -V • ;Vf- • ^ t »’ *W\ ^ .1 W*^-’ * * • I ’ ' .W*? . . • 4 ♦ f •.. 'I •. • • <• # * • • t % I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEt ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPEHY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. 1^-15DATE : •>■ A : V r . 11 . . .. . -V • k. I, \ ’* ^4 • • \ I. . « . • * • -r •*. .i * 4 • • % * •. , • * ■ t . ^ . • ‘ ‘ . ^'N ■ . • ' >1 * I 1 0 \ , V ' 1 • iV Vv ‘• ••- •»,, • *• •iS /•v:^ ‘* » A Jiif «ff.m«TTfIfa-T -T-. 3780 BAYSIDE ROAD Proposed new construction home locstion for a 1.5 acre lot with existing home to be removed. D Topog lines 942 4 940 create a natural knoll for the best building site. The existing house is located on this knoll. If the new house is located further back on the lot, to lines 938 & 936, it will sit much lower and could block the natural water flow of that lower area. During heavy rains this might create water problems in the in the new house. The present well location is also a consider ation for the new construction site. This is a very good and useable well which was drilled in 1988. It does create some problems in placing the home with consideration to well set backs and the fact that it is centrally located on the lot. Placing the garage, which also serves as small boat storage and shed, on the south side of the house minimizes driveway hard cover and saves existing trees. The south side of this lot touches an easement which is shared with the Gardiners. There is tree and shrub growth which creates a natural privacy for both lots along this easement. #1998 Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) __of 3^;^ [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located ‘^'y C2^ ^y^/J^^also referred to as Land Use Application No,------------. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to project or use requires Council approval. Propeny Owner Property Owner **♦♦♦♦♦♦ J(t***:***j|«************************* Date **##♦♦♦♦**•*♦************************ I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located __________________also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------.. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. 1 (we) am (^) not «ked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for Ci^ Council ttat I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner If vou have any information that may assist the City in the rwiew of Use Apphcmion. please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to the scheduled meeting date. I ledgement Form [print address] proposed use of the property located Application No.________. ment, I (we) am (are) not asked to but merely to confirm for the City ms and that the proposed neighbor ’s 9|| Id Jfnlt 9|n(r )|C 1(C 9tc 4iiti 9|( [print address] proposed use of the property located Application No. ment, I (we) am (are) not asked to 3ut merely to confum for the City ms and that the proposed neighbor ’s • ^ ‘V I 4 l’ » •. I • I ' ' *1 1 A • S vii Aof the of.........................................onA ajut yj,'. ... ... ••.* ... .1^^^ .t .. ^ M J. 1.1 A............ • *4 ■ • ■' '! f' ' I" 'I*/' /.'■ \ • ' . ’• ‘ .r:.. i i* ' i ; -Vv'A* *.•■ , • • •■.• • •• ’ •■ • • .'!>■;• :*' ;•■ .V: ’ ■' : • k k «.«.«. w« a 4 • »»#A4 «.<* k •« * •• H,a.« .1 4 . •»••«•••••••••%« ail/.4 •*•<•*»'.••**** >'*'1^***‘.***«4 ** ' Id aa»4V«»aP*a4»... *#••• 4 •*.«*«■ I . * ‘. ' « • '••.•]■ d ' • .• • .' •' V'!'i • • a* aa>'«*«aa**««a*««»a»»a«aa«»«4>>-a»a«a«»a #«§ aoaaw.a •« m mmmm* mk m m» ^ m-* 9m 4^ i < * ■ 4 V*' • * 4 • * I * * S * </ ••*/ . .. I , » ■* . , * ' a#*asa*aa%as»«%««4*.«a**»a«aa*ft4/%«4«##a»««*«a4*aa«a** » ■ W‘i«/« ^ % aa-» .«a«««*a •• a **%44**»* •••a»aa*a4a4»aa444« ' •• ... <r ■ .. *.,'••..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................• , bd-ci^^lojl ^0 :mJ to ^olii fh^ ^au\(, X'nfr.fhcr vUh alt' the hindHamaU? ond^chpuriftfiancco thqciwtify or In auyuiie oppoKaininf, unio the sdd fy.(rt .^.:..of (he .^•conl^ and -" afdfnr, FOREVER.. Jnd the S'.U>i.....................................................,....i.l.....„.....:.^...l...;..................... .^ ,V-' •I. ,' • < 4* •mm.mmt • 9 9 • m m • m m ^ mm 9 - 9 9 9 m m *.p 9 t* 9 » m 9mm m ».lj#»a*««a*«*»»»«a*aa . ‘v > j pCl^ t,X ifl6 fit'st V'l7'i$ 76^*.....,.,..., v.'*V??:tOi}-Q ^iVaV X f aa..l'alT9iii^,f.a,.aafca.„,,/(t ‘i'/‘J^ CA'^CV(iOf’S Ckt^d' 0/K(/y(«>'v7'C(/<?#'*/ •••••***«»«*a4.«*aaa a4a«. l<\nfXi con\ f)vcmL'(3 In (he quUt and- pi'i^ccahle p/j----’ " -■' .* heirs and atsiXn.i, afain.rt a.H personi laid purt...j,QQ/' i)ic frtl- p'xrt u-Ul • Ifn trealiwonii Xhe. tad partiRJXx^f Eic fir.;f'fr^-i:%d::y^:jia-^ihto 'srkS:^^ atid $ea.l ihc d-ip and year fret aheve U'rlUcn. ' f“j ' /v’ '■ ^’>j' , • Sl|'nnJ D'.-ll%crc(l In Frcicnrp o(ImyuiM-.■..^ . • .V. I , V •" f• •• ,. ••» • 3'41? ^ i? 7. •• i OUW r •!* «uB...an9.:Il)i.MA;'<ifs ■■;;; . *•.•', . . . •• 'y ';.i * . 4.^1-•■• V’. .................rr'*'*'*'* .if . . . . •#•:■ • ; • • •• *i*'-i • ■ f ,■•. ' •:' •■ •'■' ■ •■• .'■, • ■ ■ 'j- . ' ■ .............IW/i,.....................................J'f^............y-.......... • • ' .:. '■ y* ' ;■; ■, - •»••»,•••••••••• •*•■'• Hr****•*•'•*•** tc hmdUumivt? an(?’a;;/»Tt» £(5/f.a/tay Wtcfxiwfv:.; ■ • ; ’* .;**^• V • '• , * • . .'..o/ /7)tf second.part, ..............................................................................................................•' I •^•< •• ••• • * * * * * ‘ .V • ••«•#•••••■•••• ' 'l....t ^1 % \ .7u»V-j, cAiCulors and aiml^Utratort,}.:t m/yyy' f-mK. . /• V bc\t fi •< ■^*--- _• • ^’'>■• XVjy :’ • V‘*V'V V. • ft‘N0-35FRi 9:13 CHiCWO TiTlE FAIi NO. 4768936 P.03 • %VI * • * » • ^ *♦''. .\ •• < . #S LM Covi nty of.—j........11 c^0 r, ?p.i if................. . » . I %» * • * ■ • I « •• • • • •< . (}n ..............2PA .......................day of............AUj^U0.t|......ZX'iiO:.; ;* ...................■..........JIo.tLn;':;r..I^j.hli.a........................«m<I /lp*'c'.’’irf\Cf£f/!^i^’7.’cV^ ;!v I hA • .-• Hotsisiii^a^a • , ' .-V' . . * jVI ' *. • .. • *1 % .• I 0 \ >* r. ..... • * .. ,;•* i’*n, % w ’ . I j;r , . • , t **. <' 1 i’ , > i* ■ 'h. :.*» -1 *• • i\»* -'rii % j ' t •• A.',• 'j- .|,'■■ ■ ■.;’V;V' . •' • * I * I ' .* * • ' *. I .' • * . . *• • • • « » It ^• I • ' ‘ .»•«•(.•• *,**• -•••»# •* .( t • * t ‘ . ’ * • • I * 'i ’* t I w t t • • • • . I** ' 1 V % I ^ I < ,1 • • * • * *H 1 *• • III. • •»«' ; • , # I M, ’•. **• ■ • **l'* • '' •;•. » /* • r • I , ^ I ^ J ^ A < ' « I • » . M *. ?• .V - ■ ■ .**May<i»tiriric' . •ii' a'..* :V D« 'fe:TT # N r ,r • %• * !> >• , k I «« ^ .4 • V •• T_ •t •..•‘/S'•i.r • :.:' I. .i-• I * A. ' 5^1-si ,5\j V A/Bf*44 /49. OS 1 % s K ¥ < vy--------- § V / % c^ N •< Z' / \ / 5J N N \ \ V % \ \ CKUnt^ A fi/SU.-^ \ \ f r r w r m w r w • ^ ^ ;?3 \ \ \ '"s \ \ ^ \ \ \ \ : zo.z \ l».l N N ' *‘1 I I \ $ 9 \ \ ' n|/ A/P9 ^44 '/c "m/ f^e, O % >♦. %\ % % ilJ J ■’ ' ** ^ ...•I t I I « —. »4 ,v V. *. \ f V ./ / V ■ : / ^l.v' V-!.t ", '*JC, J.*'' - H Legal Description Lot 52, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 'Phis survey shows the location of an existing house, shed and well on the above described property, and topo graphy as supplied from the City of Orono maps. It does not purport to show any other improvements or en croachments . o: iron marker — : Existing contour from city maps E X I ^ "I i /J e. *V» < Picpoted loi*I'.TLVL A!.. • AHHKN GAUDim'.W ' -—101 3Ct»-— »I I I a ^ • V » • . I'V: . .• I • • 4 , *. * * • * 15 t 1 • I i • *i •• ■ «. : ■ ’1 '1 % * •• . 1 •••'.. •,< i ;v..‘ .* • • • • •: •ri V • • ••• • • c . • ? ♦ • V • » • • * ..• I . I ;•' 1 ’ - ‘ »} 1 • ;*• * k:ra ^;k 4v*• * .* \. ;- I • >'•• \j. I' fi'i^ 'll,' r* 14# f. •• X • •• • .* i • . •. i:*4 • * ••»• • • V C- • : I------1 I I howJt 4- L-,.1 1 * Ni7i/m^I Tterf I ^ ! I I \ I I-------1 E XI * 1# • « Tpf0 liCgn.. Ocncription Lot 52, Aviditor's Subdivision o., 203, llGiinepin County, Minnosotn. This survey shows the .location of nn existing house, shed nnd well on tlie above described in-opei-ty, and topo- ginphy us supplied from the City of (<rono mups. It does not purport I o ^ihow any other improvemei.ts or cm,- cronchinejits . o: iron marker " • existing contour yor = /.So * .UAfx from city maps L'J ;i4«l I IiI# • I i I n t in \o [ Jlt I ± ^*^>**« • ••. A «a^ » •.•Ml ** I* -TJ r*-?' Il5f SirJ•• = M\n |iS :1;••• I ir • . •. « ••«•. • hf >« V.f »hJ* *k • • ti %. t: i*- •<. • I /• •*4r ’ <; I •. . i\: - :. r >1. if,: t; **4 K* » y 4 3 i-'*V P i •l 'v <ri ,t I » ‘■’i •*-. f i i*'. ’( •t >* \4 . % « . > > 4 :i.’V.: “ 'f 4“v.'.;*V. » ♦ % ••<\ ■I* ‘X' *' !* •. • J ;• * • ! ' l-l ' * - t <Tr; •' • •.' • *• •.••■v‘’..r2.-*. F-.?;i • • ' * [\ V -rr rr • $ k . 4 t • t '• • •■ *1 <: '■? -tv-rM •Vf/.-X'H.of ..........- • t* t * ? =5^ M- r»»* if H I CD CO II f*/ V r>v fi t’j. k V.-! V *.*> . k A. v'' n’ A* v‘ y -/I l« 0 N NI*. 0 6- V)1 0 N (y^ I- 0 ■ 'jj ...____►JO- •V I' r ♦ — • }• 1. I- ; I*'- •4; /.! », r? • ♦ . r •.••! •*TI 4*i t . \’ .'1. j*•/ ;•» t*.‘ I: M ph r -•;. V..' ;.* 4 / 1/ #’■ Y ri t ■» f ■iv ;i : I i- t, V* * i,^.f ;3.- V.: * -/ v*^r*. * • »' * \ ( * . A «« A I • •• t ^ • .c . Y-. 4•V it y’\ p' * A •' - % % “• t'.1''r-V *.v ft: CO #> .?A-•?' ('/■V. j*. % * ijj -ft • . • ..mm* • ». I ! : J • . y n « ;i . w: • I I# I—M*. j -.r** * • 9»miK * • t« • iip«« I•-rr-r^/r / .. .• < **• I ••••V4 T«• •> •• • U '4 » . * 4 • • * • 5*« ■ j \ v>.'. FE2-22-l3r5 04:53 P.01 To: City of Orono Planning Commission From: Steve Gardiner. 3770 Bayside Rd Subject: Item #1998 Craig WicWund variance of 3780 Baysioe Dtte: 2-22-95 The following is for infcrmaticn only. I have no ofciection to the variance application at 3780 Bayside Rd. Enclosed ,s a sun/ey of oor proo.ny at 3770 Bayside Rd. Please note me entrance 10 the 3780 preoM“oresses ou?pr=peny. This does not concern me at this time tut might be a future issue I would like to reouest that construction trucks do not ditve past the entrance to 3780 dose to our house and back up into the propery. This would damage the gravel dnveway we maintain. I would like to be informed of the variances granted as we are considenng remodeling our house also. Please call me at 476-0254 if you have any questions. Steve Gardiner Pie pored for’*IITL’VK A!.: • AHMIM CAHniNi:i<i •<• . •.a*'.I'.!'. .fcl-' *1 . ‘'i ■ .*!I .• • f - - - ----------- - - - _ J_____ , JW 0u Tr*?r . —“*207 SC»"’— Sfil"j;z4“£ • • t l' f. I , . > I 4 . • I -I.' :■ t'-, •i^l 'I.-' • ,3 iJi . I • I • . V ■A " REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed: DATE: March 8, 1995 •YJ 7TEM NO.; / ^ Agenda Section: Zoning % Item Description: Sewer Connection - Dean Maeser, 372 Westlake Street Summary The lakeshore property at 372 Westlake Street contains a principal residence, plus two small rental cabins located about 30’ from the lake. In an early 1992 work session, upon staff recommendation Council chose to provide one sewer stub and assess one sewer unit to the property. It was noted that the cabins are nonconforming, and providing/assessing additional units would potentially create a strong argument for prolonging the nonconforming use or for a subdivision with lot size variance request. The property owner has not met the 16 month deadline for connection of the principal residence, and staff has provided a number of options for resolving this situation as indicated in Exhibit B. The septic system serving the residence and cabins is nonconforming in setback from the lake and height above water table. The property owner requests that the Council approve Option 4, connection of the two rental units to municipal sewer with no connection charge (SAC charge would be required) for a period of five years starting now, at the end of which the cabins would be removed. Staff would recommend a shorter time period given the nonconformity of the rental use, and the fact the owner has been aware of this issue for approximately three years. List of Exhibits A - Letter from Michael Perlman 2/10/95 B - Letter to Property Owner 2/1/95 C - Survey D Ordinance #105, 2nd Series E - Letter to Property Owner 8/8/94 F - Letter to Property Owner 3/24/93 G - 8/21/92 Staff Meeting Notes H - 3/17/92 Letter to Property Owner I - Staff Memo 2/24/92 (Excerpts and Plat Map) J - 7/28/80 Letter to Previous Property Owner K - Nonconforming Use Code Sections L - Code Section Requiring Separate Sewer Services Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 March 8, 1995 Sewer Connection - Maeser Additional Information • Exhibit B defines the City’s stated position on this maner based on code requirements, past City actions, and past actions by the current and previous property owners. • Three of the four options proposed by staff for resolving the issue require City Council approval. • Additional exhibits have been provided as further background on this issue. • While the cabins are not falling down, staff has been called on by tenants in the past to deal with substandard electrical wiring in the cabins, which was repaired. • Staff has concluded that the nonconforming use sections of the code technically could apply to these cabins, and that their nonconforming use for rental purposes could have been required to cease as early as 1978. • The current owner purchased this property in 1985. Staff Recommendation Given that this 2-acre property in a 2-acre zone is too small to subdivide, and given the property owner’s understandable reluctance to spend nearly $28,000 to connect the cabins to sewer, staff would recommend that Option 4 of Exhibit B be conceptually approved via execution of an agreement to be drafted by the applicant’s attorney and approved by the City Attorney, containing as a minimum, the following conditions: 1. The principal residence shall be connected to municipal sewer within 90 days. 2. 3. The two cabins shall be connected to the municipal sewer within 90 days. Such connection shall be a separate connection from the principal residence connection. Connection of the cabins to municipal sewer is considered temporary, and such connection is allowed for a period of___years. At the end of_____years, the property owner shall remove said connection, remove plumbing from the cabins, and discontinue rental use of the cabins. The cabins then shall either be removed from the property or moved to a location on the property that conforms with all provisions of the Orono Zoning Code governing the location and use of accessory storage structures. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 March 8, 1995 Sewer Connection - Maeser Prior to connection of the residence and cabins to municipal sewer, the property owner shall pay the appropriate Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) and obtain the appropriate connection permits. The property owner shall not be required to pay the connection charge of $13,097 per cabin since the connection is temporary in nature per the terms of this agreement. By allow ing temporary connection of the cabins to municipal sewer, the City is in no way granting any specific rights to future reconstruction or replacement of the cabins. Further, connection of the cabins shall not be used as justification for any request by the propeny owner for future variances, subdivision of the property, etc. 7.There shall be no refund of any SAC or permit fees when the cabins are disconnected. 8. All three tax parcels shall immediately be legally combined into one tax parcel COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Give staff and the property owner direction regarding whether the proposed option is conceptually acceptable. If so, take the following action: 1. Determine how many years the temporary connection will be allowed. 2.Advise applicant’s attorney to work with the City Attorney in drafting a mutually acceptable agreement for Council approval. .J A PERLMAN LAW OFFICE, P.A. AHORNEYS AT lAW FEB 1 3 1995 MICHAEL I PERLMAN LAURA LEOSWORTH WANC DEBORAH S. BRE7INA liCAl ASSiyiANt ALLAN r SHAPIRO Of COUN«l 426 PARKDAIE PLAZA 1660 SOUTH HIGHWAY 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5S416 TELEPHONE 16121 S44-9190 FAX 16121 544-9213 February 10, 1995 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 RE: Maeser/Sewer Connection 372 W. Lake Street Dear Mr. Gaffron: I have reviewed your February 1, 1995 letter with Mr. Maeser. The options regarding the cabins that are proposed on pages 2 and 3 of your letter are not very attractive. Options 2 and 3 are cost-prohibitive, and my clients cannot consider them for that reason. That leaves options 1 and 4. Option 1 is, obviously, of no benefit to my clients. They purchased the property in reliance upon the rental use of the cabins. Their income and livelihood depend in part on the rental use. Option 4 is the only one that the Maesers can realistically look at. However, the time fr2une for removal of the cabins (2 years) is too short for them to make plans for their financial future. Since Ordinance #105 has a 60 month provision for certain situations, my clients are requesting that the City grant approval of option 4, with payment of the SAC charge for each cabin, for a period of 60 months. Please let me know how and when we might present this request before the City Council. Sincerely,S xnc0]r0X]j|r ^ Mxchael L. Perlman PERLMAN LAW OFFICE, P.A. MLP/db cc: Mr. and Mrs. Dean Maeser f^O \\ vt.. February 1, 1995 6^. E CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTici Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 65 Crystal Bay. fitN 55323 C065 Mr. Dean Maeser 372 Westlake Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re; Sewer Connection Dear Mr. Maeser; The sixteen mon* deadline for connection of ^Mence to Ci^ 1994. our records indicate that no requirement in a L;rdt?ru2 8"%”ched), in which Steve Weckman e,xtended your dead'me to September 15. 1994. This was not met. c Kar 1Q04 T discussed with vour attorney, Michael Perlman, the issues fu^undm/SLi o'youf two renta. cabins to sewer, -nte City's position is as follows: The main residence strucmre must immediately be connected to municipal sewer. b. Tltl aot Council chose to assess only one unit, to serve the ma n residence, based on the following conclusions; . S: t Sre 0“^^- lines, therefore this . Bay and dtetefore am considered as nonconforming accessory structures. . The use of the cabins as rental units is a nonconfonmng use m the LR-IA Stngi Familv Lakeshore Zoning District. r.,„:iv inr ^ire of 2.0 • The LR-IA Zoning District requires a minimum single^ y acres. The combined acreage of the three tax parcels is ^.1 . subdivision to convert the rental cabins mto free standing smgle fam y units is feasible 1. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Mr. Dean Maeser February 1, 1995 Page 2 c. It is the City’s position tot to cabto M^no nonconforming use. Pec Zoning Code Secuon O yjiue upon the effective date use involving a *,'*5^0? S3.000 or less may be continued for a period of of this zoning chapter (1/^75) o b^ ^nch lTo'S:rui"arc:lt umess brought into conformity .ith to zonmg rriew of the City — — rental c’bins as of 1/1/70 for ^ntal purposes was required by Technically "™7f^°t the Citv has tacitly allowed this use a sixteencode to cease as of 1/1//o- in cucli, uit year grace period. evstem located less than 75’ from the d. The two cabins and your home sh^e p records. This system lake and less than 3 ’ above e w cnbiect to City ordinances regardingis by definition nonconformmg and subject to t.iry nonconforming septic acknowledged by the then owner. e. A septic system repair permit issued m 19SU to[ rurdtv"«a"r2tow of to co^o^ty ismes which arc now of concern due to to sewer whetor cominued use of to non- " :::f;i " » hazardous building action regarding to cabins. Zoning Administrator .'earm^ loTssi"foriy^^^^ to be discontinued, with a possi ty subsequently contact the City rarS'^g^Sf o^ e"^ -Used for a single sewer unit. Tfie followto are potential options regarding to cabto (Options 2. 3 and 4 require City Sun“oval and might not be approved if requested): )W 1. Discontinue rental use of to '^‘^^p™”UTwS'l»°ailowed only non-strucmral 3 and 10.53. Subd. 25. Oij 2. repairs ---- Request to City Council’s approval to comtme. TZ^Z cabins. Such a system requires ^ ^ situation other than on a wS;UU;;a"L eU^ - become available in to near mrnre That is not the case here. City staff wUl not support this option. Mr. DeanMae^er February 1, 1995 Page 3 4. Request that the City CouncU allow the cabins to be connected to municipal sewer. That connection would be conditioned on the following: nt of S850 Sewer AvailabiUty Charge (SAC) for h Payment of a separate connection charge for each cabm of Sla,09/ per umt. c. Property owner would have to execute an agreement contaunng the following for a Mitional sewer units allows connection only for the remaining life of «ch ex^ umt (smtctural repairs would not be allowed), and dm. once sSch rental units are discontinued, there will be no refund of any portion of • Paymem'of additional connection charges does not grant any specific rights to . Pavm^mrf'la'w p Xci^"u"atoTcon^e “o^^^^^^^ renulTi^ts io municipal sewer recommend that lime period not exceed two years. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-7357. Michael P. Gattro: Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. cc: Michael Perlman. Suite 426, Parkdale Plaza. 1660 Hwy. 100, St. Louis Park. MN 55417 Thomas Barrett, City Attorney \ CO Q mr%. 3 •^m •>\J ^ Q Q. V\^ '^* V: V r*o ^J rvo • ^ •'^°CO > Q r4- O J 0 O O :)•J 5^r*. ii. ( in o V w r*.o V ^in u.Q.5c Q v:r^r4»'^'l :3 "I Ul c (A o«•a Q :3y)Q. 0 0 1 8 V:•!■ r*.Q o?O O ORDINANCE #105, 2nd Series trv-PMPT PROPBRTISS WITHIN TEE OrSSo^S^ICH’M- CODB SBCTI^2-30, ^ g Tffi STUBBS BAT SEWER PROJECT 2T C'^y of Orono area; and ^^-ea includes 137 TOERERS, the Stubbs Bay sewerprovided with b;-”ei:itsibi^re?s it E^hibit A ^BK^S, -!'^,/,\"c"on^T=ti"on or early be complete and available for c 1993; and ^ t o -in subdivision 4 WHEREAS, Municipal code Section^^^^ ^'^^^ '^tht’^CitV <B) (1) requires thayhe owners^ f ^I5er° and ^tfSiril non^ts of the availability of the • _ sewer wi^-a.m i ____ ^™diate fmar u «-;snj%V?5S suo^ect uo w..e . fall into one or more o- , .-he owners of properties which « = ■■ ill following eategories shali^^^^.^ rts residence to municipal se availability: Page 1 of 3 Ordinance #105, 2nd Se-res 3. 4. wi-h sectic systems tha-a. ^-ro?®rties wi.li discharging -o -he s „-i-,a-v or •«rr hold-’’ng tanJcs as a p-i^a*^ b. “sewage disposal. " partial me . ‘ following .ne c-wners of V:; Of the L;o?i -7^;£i3htan^ - r;orveriyi;separ_a^,^^^ elevation o. to the bottom Oa. the r distance is properties that B^°y ”or^^Stutbs*Bl? 75- from the shoreline or » properties tha\have drainfieW^ „ater the State minimum ou - ^ .. .not the categories in I-cm "Vla Att?e, existing residence -cu ,«wer becomes ?6 0) months t*'%joperty which ®’'P®t'ac"ce» ®|Pj^odexcept that any pfope-ty ^h connection pe |XIIi”miKe“su%roStl^o: within ,0 days o- notice such failure. ^ Stubbs x„ the event that a septiC system f^^/Vhorelana^^ |Sr%”uil"<?ing P%V^ X%"nSd!vis “fon ‘ 17 (C). the £flfc"aVcr 4o°n4Sn%/^ng classifioahaon. ^ Page 2 of 3 c. Ordinance ^105 2nd Series 5.If aurinc the 60 connec ten ? confort.ity initiates a progran i:, the Shoreland classification. 01 ^}1 -3^^ ^^wer project area overlay Dis.----~ " such oroaram to the extentShall be I ^3 ^on-conforr.inc solely as a result of such lin’^nation deadline, nomal one year nor.-con*o.rt--/ section 2. Sffeotive cate effective upon publication. This ordinance shall be Utuil ---------- . , a-w- citv of OronOf, . ^ j Hv ^he City Council o.- ^ne ui -Adopted by 1992. Minnesota this _27^ cay or ------------ R41, B CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Park-vay Maitinn .^ddress: P.O. Box 65 Crono. MN 5525o Crystal Bay. 55323 0C65 Ausust 3, 1994 Dcun Maeser 372 Westlake Street Lone Lar.e, MN “5356 Dear Mr. Maeser;ucar 4>ii. i'la'-ovi.. HVJ Sincerely, Stephen Weekman On-Site Systenas Manager SW/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 mi. F // if O N \o • \ V> .%• *1 . , ■'^if^EsnOt CITYof ORONO MuBiap*i OfDc** Office Box 6^ Cry«^ Bay. NlinoBoa 5S3rJ-00« March 24. 1993 Dear Stubbs Bay Resident: , n, in vour neighborhood is complete and you may connect your The sanitary sewer system m ,o o residences any time. fotlowna are basic guidelines that you should consider when you plan to hooh up: , Vou must pay a Sewer Availability ' ■ permit can be issued to your City to the Metropolitan made in 1993. This fee is 'jhe fee. The fee is normally ImL'^/rMWC^ylar. so connections occurring in tore years will likclv pav a higher SAC. a you must hire a plumber to mahe the -“f - f'^rilltrd'p — Uie sewer service smb brought jn new City offices at SS’.“‘JS shouW toure tha? this is included in the plumber s bid. All sanitary plumbing serving your as a sewer If vou intend to mamtam an existmg septic y . and receiver fo^ footing or foundation tile drainage, this will require pnor re approval by the City Inspector. It is ille2al to discharge footing and foundation^toins, ^^sadtar>' sewer m: tomry sewer system. Such drains cannot be co^ect d to system, but must be routed to the ground surfac- or a s p 3. 4. TELEPHONE - 473-7S57 • F.\X-47M510 8. Stubbs Bay March 24, 1993 Page 2 ^ vnnr residence to the serv ice stub should be at a depth of at least 7. The pipe from , freezing problems. Any connection n deSli ton 4:-‘or*ndemeach driveways or parking areas tot wUl ^t-ru»nf rpmiires 2 mininiiini scp3.ration of 20 between The State Health D'P „ „,eiis and non-air tested lines. If weUs and 50' from your well or a neighbor’s S v“nt'ractor will be required to air test your conneetton. Upon'connection. to quanerly sewer service charge will be S51.15 (1993 rate). Once sewer >s ava.lable Arties will begin to pay to full "■ sewerte a°t to en^ of the designated connection period whether they have connected to the system or not. monre nipnse feel free to contact me; Bruce Vang, Building If you have other questions or comments, please teei tree lo lu Inspector; or Lyle Oman, Building Official. Sincerely. 9. 10. John R. Gerhardson Public Works Director JRG/lsv Enclosures c> - __ u-/^y -ru>^—T''^' ________ /^J£i/c-45S'C:- -12^—---------- ^ ^ , /v-r/^w ------y A>7"^v ^Mj G-_X?^—^----------- /=b;e_ 7ct^_-'-'----------------- .^ . £rvO J .AJ&i 6^Dtfa -- ---------- _7TD_. 4r2zr^'5-.---------------- ■ 4 ~f^a-:MUJry.^/f.------------- /• r. i r 'T-——- — i4j^jp /^ _^y/j7T^‘i 7../I3_v^_, .i^4>r>-^- ____________/'/ r— /o... Mm-: t \ :stt< March 1“^/ 1992 ■^tk . H CITY of ORONO >funidpal OCBca PaAOfSoeBox66 Crj-stal Bay, Ntinnesoa 5532M066 Dean Maeser 372 Westlake Street Long Lake, MJI 5535o RE: Stubbs Bay Sewer Projec — — Sewer Unit Assessment Dear Mr. Maeser: The City council, is Sin« to be assessed ir t.ne S^ub , V historically i”?y have ^onL'’”e'l“orrthan oir-diel'-ling unit, there is a potential assesino multiple units to your property. your input to. the Planning process will helP '^rt'c number of units to your ific^tions of one unit versus Su!tirie%n?ts “ss“s”e“d to your property. Please contact me at 473-7357. TELEPHONE-473-7357 • FAX-47M510 . T To; Prom: Date: R^rLorsr^?itrAd°iSistratSr^° Ron Moorsef v -xl -j , . . ^ P. Ca«ron, .ss. PXannin, a ua„, February 24. 1592 ^ Subjects Stubbs Bay Sewer r a „ to provide an analysis and The intent of this identified in the cover recommendation for each of the issu outline. I. Area Inclusions. The project has Fas^^SIs'^Seirdliermined from an^engxj^^^ • be the minimum feasible . trunks vs. laterals. Each o^ areas and the designatxon of N%rth, Oxford, and Tt the !-,rclud%"d'or°excfured"tn their own merits SitW a?fect!ng"tU"flasibility of other areas — * • ^ A. B. : X «= o • trrie?ativel “*small lots as comp«^^ htve*'®maVginf 1 L%%!c“sy ‘’s\em7wftr;ot?yten"tia\ for replacement. estimated Bnit Costs Northwest - S12.440, Northeast - $12,450; Baside East - $10,650. Staff Recommendation: Inclusion. Bederwood. The B«derwood area^ inoluding^lO^ho^ plus 1 vicant lot, will | of the lots are lystem and a grinder pump c °re 0.8 acre or i:6 acre or greater, the /ailing system with smaller. Of these 10, one f® Vf^^-oement system, 2 poor potential for a conforming ^ but still others would be ?%/at/o/, the cost of working* B6caus6 of th6^li serving this area is relatively high. EstJjL.i’--c^Cr Unit Cost; $18,190. Staff Recommendation: Trunk ouest^° and assess lateral now if neighborhood requests. 1. 2. 3. 4. a. b. follow existing prop^J-'-i 420 Tonkawa^ is in the sewered The 3+ acre parcel. 42 zone, was " was not assessed for that project, but appar J^nnected to the sewer. The service and has n that parcel would be current connectio $33.35 pet front foot,57,035 charge plus ^S33^.3|,p^^^^^ 510,000 which could ®”°“i'\ermination of footage to be depending °”j prooerty owner was notified in !ll!^rhlt ^rtLrgri"h!r"conlep\*^a\fy ^^/uld’^n^^ To^nV- "r'the^-se’ if the Stubbs Bay project is ordered. in staffs \^t®f r^^^ l^oD^e^'ct'conditioned on the following: Legal combination with adjacent 3 acre A9H Tonkawa to sawcrr rr^o^ittrownrr^ro °/a^^ore ’'c\ion charge (amount to be determined). under thi s s=®^ Yec^ ^the''to\^al ^:“rth"of the loning boundary li>?« ?hln the 2-acre minimum for a ^“l^^^Vortion of future subdivision proposal for the porti property in the Yacilitie°s" fo? connection to t"hfm^nil^prrse«r°*ara%^\"^cant•s cost. An additional factor with this req“est,^^is_^Y“| the City needs an ®. „g „jin. The the 1 acre vacant parcel for a thisproperty owners- agent has been a-lutsed of this neld and has been requested to contact the City Engineer regarding this easement. Staff Recommendation: 1. Allow exclusion conditioned on legal combinat 2. Rlquir^e°^coAnection of 420 Tonkawa to existing 3. Negotiate connection charge for consideration of request for of permanent easements along north boun y roperty. B, 372 Westlake Street - Dean Maeser. A • T V Has contciiri®*^ 3 SII15I0 sewer unit. structures on more than 1 of considered as principa City's interest if the the parcels, it and plumbing removed from the properties were i i^v that the property owner Cabins. There is a multiple units if would see a benefit in P y rearrangement to that would guarantee current zoning would not allow more than ^ . 3 separate parcels withoutallow development of the 3 separai. extreme variances. Staff Recommendation: 1. Review the zoning issues with the property owner. 2. If Pf°P®P'^y °""*ll”be*^charged^/o*r units properties. ' • Sflf - remove"ri^ln^f °rL ^a“bins and^cSe llTl parcels into !• 324/3 3 2 Westlake street -_§1 ake p^a^rc^ls. acre property consists variances for upgrading The applicant had been granted va City agreed tSe residence on the southern "°%erty bfsed on future applicant^ ^o fnl irese are still 2 separate commonly owned tax parcels. staff Recommendations renews the expL%'d‘’vartlnle"a^*d fallows \h/ough with his original proposal . D. 3865 Bayside - ^The®property^o^ers 2 tax parcels, totaling 1.9 acres. P requested 2in signing their original appeal waiver re^qu sewer units. The existing residen obviously smaller of the 2 parcels. f^ain ^him the wants 2 sewer units only if that will <3 ability to build a second residence. From a zoning code standpoint, the a* single combination of properties should be Q^imately unit. Under the 2 acre standards the appr . 200' of shoreline would allow only 1 unit^ even if there was enough acreage for %®®=°"4heriy Also, although there are 2 tax parcels, th C. A 0 ' VI I *•*• I ■ i(^,.i'l fciLEEN ST ,* - «ll V Mli vf • t • " wm^ V - *11 ;D > ’ II /1 •— to ^ lt\;• ? A ^ f 1!? V • 1•« CD•••* *»(ll» 1 tc#% II /1 C a -to ' 11/iA * \■• (lie)* in m ik IM «T» itl II / \ *'• / X « •V u r«> !•% \ • \» •^ LOtd\i • V "'imI • II 4 » ’'li* ' ;; »> M 1 \: • •» • t n ;// iz^ (pa«ocHT5.; Z3 :jf' CoKHiMoU \/Ac. LoTT ! 5* -jf^ VAC. re/». 6.^>r7 : 2 ,/\fJTici pAret^ # 5£v>Jcye. UAJir3 : 2_5-2T? /(/(a loTSIZCi ^IZC^TXV>rtof*ct>^ thCl. o/n AC - )cA^C»^ 0«*2- Ac- “ 2 Ac —^ \ I J1-*J 1"i : . T#lephont 473*7357 il^** CITY OF ORONO f*' ‘ • • • •■ cV « .>A«* * n-vr.' c.«t omp» li«»« ««»Cry»ul Bay. Minne«>U SS3Xi«Miuudpal 0«« / . ' - w» * f ‘ , «- I r *. \ I • ••'• •■lit CITY of ORONQ (M the Xorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 28, 1980 • ■ . .. ■ j ', ^ V . ■ • > - V ^ •»* *r »: • - Mr. Leo Levens 372 West Lake Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re; Repairs to Existing Septic Syn* ^'in . --I’-.v.; ■.: • . ‘ ■■ * -• "1 .* f .•-*■ ' n i -a • ♦ _k^ •*• .a ^ : ■ >*?..-% • <'t - •■>"f • J ’.'^ t •• . ^.r, -A,"*. •»*•■. . «*-6» t ' . •• • • - >' ■ 5i; v^ . r . .♦.# ••. r,a» V **■■• *V > V ««« /.. k «aDear Mr. Levens: . v V>A*'.a* y *' We have reviewed your plans tor repairs to your drainfield as by Jerry Johnson your contractor. does not conform to current code standards, it may *^®f^®^® *fj health hazard (sewage backup into livina quarters) while creaSng any additi^al pollution haza ". to the lalce. However, the Suncil has indicated they do not intend to sewer West Lake time, and has directed that all lakeshore properties fepticjiystgf^Vh, which are non-conforming by State and City Shoreland 5 yet not visibly causing a pollution or health problem t**® I be made conforming within an unspecified period of time to by the City staff! At this time, we are still in the PfO«®?» all non-conforming shoreland systems in the City orders requiring compliance within a set time, probably within ;JL' We have issued a permit to your contractor for the proposed drainflj addition as long as you agree to abide by the compliance orders,to4» issued in the near future. Please sign and return a copy of-thiS^^O If you ho.o any questions, please call. 1 have enclosed a copy 'of of Minnesota Extension Bulletin 394 which outlines the state - i. y.<•;;;/ V*. ’‘H sincerely. On-Site Syste.T5S Manager MPG:kh Enc. I agree to comply with orders to bring the sep dwellings at 372 West Lake Street into compliai codes per City requirements outlined ^in;.^ H.. -‘t . m-'i- V ■ V.|^ ■ Vilf :■ .-;534 Y SEC. 10.03. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subd. 1. £o^ <=»e promotion of the public health, safety, morals, ana we-^are. oo<;*--ictive Provisions To Apply. Where Subd. 2. More ginn of the Zoning Chapter are the conditions imposed by any provi ^^^^^.i^tive than comparable either more restrictive city Code provision, stature, conditions imposed by any regulations which are resolution, or regulation . - higher standards or requirements mote restrictive, or wnicn impose nigne shall prevail. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 subd. 3. All “ spuci^Vule Requirements. A building PgJggggj-y permission of the permit, or other permiw , Qitv Code may be denied if t. wherever or whenever compatible with the intent and proposed action or P®/ Manaaement Plan, the Storm Water provisions of the -ii ‘ g' Policy Statement promulgated by Ln-Off and Shoreland Guidelines any other valid ?he Lake ^Unnetonka_ Conservation Di^sji^r^i^^^^ adooted by the City. PoTic'y .Statement, Jother n"Selic!a!'cS and med'”/ use and examination by the public in the City Hall. Source; Ordinance No. 17 Effective Date: 1-1-75 subd. 4. prohibitions “ l%^"i3%""any s?ruc°ur“or ISirior a^TTuVpoae °n^r^S^“an;’^manner which is not in conformity with the Zoning Chapter. —------ ^pS?ruaJ;t"'to" coidftYonal use permit granted as hereina soecifia<3. , . A. The non-conforming use may not be change another non-conforming use. orevent the B. Nothing in this Zoning ChaPter shall 13 i»°u'ns^fV'bT ‘trBi.il“^q ISalecVor" P^ui-n^^ the necessary ORONO CC 251 (4-1-84) s 10.03 .eoairs shall not constitute »ote than^^fUt^^^ sS="^ f^iLs-Z^^/ea-A-s a'tt^% to - s^e locatea an.whete on the land, such as signs, mar^.ue-s, C. When any lawful non-co^£or™in, ^us^e^o^^___any urerit'shln^nSt t?ere"a£ter be changea to any non-conforning use. atror a lawful non-conforming structure shall D. Whene/er a -vrhin«;ion earthquake, war, riot, have been damaged by J'°°s.-^ucted and'used as before if it be or act of God, it may be "I^^ths after such calamity, unless reconstructed within is seventy-five percent the damage to value as shown on the assessment (75%) or more or its 4^ which case the whole thereof records at the ^^v construction thereafter shall be for a shall be demolished, and a ^ ^ g this Zoning Chapter, use in accordance with the provisions ,t- ar a lawful non-conforming use of a ..gcbufe Of ifna !l“a°^sh°a\l'Te"^^'confSrmiti: with the provisions of thrs Zoning Chapter. involving a S ntruoture with an ^3 oo”“o or less, may be continuedaate of this Zoning Chapter of S3j^0 • <) o effective aate of for a P«ic<3 °l'='’/'^treVeupon such SnilsrSrS2gSf!nlo'c“oSl”mrty with the Zoning Chapter. G. Any proposea *"£0? which a"buildingzoning Chapter, become non-conf^^^^^^ ll-ti: ^effert«« lfa'rtea"''«i\hln%\x'?6) "m^J ’n^hs of *“rhln''\w1f°'yearl. ftfuoVure*"ana'°u"s'f s“A° t1?e?ea%ter be a legally existing non- conforming structure and use. H. Normal maintenance of % ule is structure containing or related tural repairs andl™,-l-fPd including necessary "on-structurax ^ fncidental 'aUerations which ao not extena or intensify conforming use. •* ORONO CC 252 (4-1-84) /N § 10.03 I Alterations may be made to a building containing UvIbilitrihL^eof,'"?^ no\®^ncr%^as''e' the"‘nu'mblr of dweiling'units or bui:< of the builcing. Source; Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 T inniv to "Uses" Only. The non-conforming use J. pvianter aoDlv only to the use to whichprovisions of the ^on^^g Cha r aooly to situations where land and buildings are put, an size or other factors notlocation or height or structures, ^lot^size^^^^ conformance with involving the use or tne chaot-r Where, however, such a the requirements of situated existed legally recuire "strict comoliance and will c£ a variance under Section io.oa. ----------- Subd. 6. Lot be entire corded in the which a deed or n^ods or the Registrar of Titles for approval by the Council if requirec. Source; Municipal Code Effective Date; 9-14-67 A Existina Lots. A lot of record existing upon January 1. 1975 in an -pf" "“'dtr^a/Se reauirementa of the Zoning j-^ached dwellino purpose provided utilized for p”jly |«»^ftucruse doe^ not adversely :£?e\t"punlic^tri?"%fsailtyTd'Vne following requirements are met: Source: City Code Effective Date; 4-1-84 1 In "R" Districts of One Acre .or i*®®* With public sanitary' Sewer. A lot of record existing ^ effective date of this ^^hfSh lot ° s serviced by =u^\^ic°^a“^t\'’ry^"stwer=inf"wliirdo£^otm^^^^ ORONO CC 253 (4-1-84) lyw. r- CJ>^^1 “^ ^10.55 ■. uses A structure or the use O. a stru/eu^^- ??rvfs!c^.s°^r\^hfrVec\Kn ‘ .e continued su.,e=t to t.e fol’.owing conditions: V, nse s'-^ali be exoanded, changed, enlargedA. such use s.al- ^^-^.^onforn;!ty. or altered in a way whicn increases 1 ^iforation or addition to any non-B. No structural alt-r^^^ structure shall exceedSO conforming structure over ^ its becoming a non-conforming oercent of its value at the ‘ ^.-anently changed to a_ conforming use, unless the structure^^i would substantially re uce use or unless -ne a---“ - . ^ entire structure,potential flood damages for th. ^ • r^r addition to anv non-conformingC. Anv alteration or acditi - damage Subparagraph E of this Se-wion. \ -------- It any non-conforming o^f Ttl means, including, floods, 5°/" ®*“o^s?ructed Except in assessed value, it s a section. However, the City 1 1?”rprooled,-°e°?s«Vd" or “otherwise protected in conformity « this Section. are or become „.isances .nall^noA^^ °/itltj“?l^\n‘ti1i!.ras “non-conforming uses 0.0 Which has ^ considered es a non-conforming use. plooaway t? Non-conforming uses located f-" ^^th the District shall be "^within reasonable tire^“s''le?«mtnrd by the City, after a hearing for_^eac^_^ conforming use. The Council shall make improvement '^P°‘\tive basis of the monetary vilue of any (4-1-84) ORONO CC 375 \ r S 10.55 as a result of this Section shall he con^ losses resulting from the requi^emenr ___________ _ under this Section. ------ --------------------------------- “ irTnTe The flood plain designation on Subd. 27. Am®ndment^^ removed from flood plain areas the official maps shall no desianation is in error and that unless it can be shown the regional flood and is the area is at or above the el , plain. Special exceptions to contiguous to lands ^Coi^issioner of Natural Resources this rule may be "other measures, lands are adequately if he determines that, tnrough * amendments to this Section protected for the mtended inust be submitted to and including amenctments to_ ^ne o - Natural Resources prior to approved by the ^^°5c^al maps also require prior approval adootion. Changes in °^-.t^-lttation.by the Federal Insurance Adminis.-a „ T_ 4-hfair interpretation and subd. 23. Section shall be held to be aoDlication, the ^ , "he liberally construed in favor of minimum requirements / j a l-'mitation or repeal of any the City and shall not /®®"'|tatut;s! The boundaries of the other powers granted by a ^jQ.^gj.^ined by scaling distances on Flood Plain Districts shall ___ahation is needed as to the exact the official maps. Where in e. ^j^gtrict as shown on the official location of t.he boundaries to be a conflict between a maps, as f ac-ul If’eld conditions, the City Engineer mapped boundary ^^'^^^^'^f^^.T^retaticn based on elevations on the shall make t.he "’“ofile. The person contesting the regional (100-year) ^ gha 1 1 be given a reasonable lolation of the and\o submit tec.hnical oDOortunity to present his ca..e uo u evidence if he so desires. subd. 29. Abrogation and Greater Restrj.cJ:io^^^^^^ not intended by this Section to covenants or deed existing ordinance, this Section imposes greater L%\Vit?fon°s^.^;he"p7o^IsYo^^ ^^all prevail. subd. 3p. warning °\sl^e'^the''f^^^^ Section does not imply that areas <-tT*icts will be free from or land uses permitted within . shall not create liability flooding or flood damages. .p.p.:employee thereof fot any on the f rt =f re?fan«"SS"?Ls Section or any flTnisratlvl li’c?sior “lLfuny .ade thereunder. Source: Ordinance No. 213 Effective Date: 1-11-79 ORONO CC 376 (4-1-84) k s 3.05 f the description of the premises shall specify the / thereof. The amount so certifiedlerved, and the name of the owner th^ereo^^ against such shall be extended by the Au ° ^ taxes, and collected by the premises in the same manner ^s °tne County Treasurer, and paid to cn ^ Subd. 9. Damage damage to any municipal ^ ul i?i ty ^VquTpment ' or limited to, meters, street ^ | reasonable value thereof Anvone causing such damage shal P ^nd installation of any to' the City, including an insurer of any equipment in ^i*f^:s%”e^sTon or" with" Which he comes in contact. Subd. 10. Municipal Utility^Service °^tsi^e The City Administrator is City, orovided, that such utility service to consumers \^he ter^s'of the City Code, consum'^ers specifically agree ^^^^^e/ulations and ^ates adopted including, assess delinquent service^ thereunder and the rig ^ Charges and penalties. Each separate occupied subd. 11. S«P®”'!,,Mdinr o'r occupancy on a sin?!® ^”p"eVty" s°all\'e sS^by Vcu|?nc”''nriuding Tcrint^ "°t (^"aS^iex i“frng7 ?rsid\^"ui°o'r'’«S:«^'iaru"|s fe;ing^ »°» ^^^S/on* aTeaV o7 the SStldtn, including -„r\-,ri:gs° or leasehold co^bercial e^=?^J^g‘rhiving o'n^i oJner but multiple tenants _ SEC 3 06 CERTIFICATION BEQniRED connect a lot certUicate «'"?H|ate isLed under this Subdivision^sh Section. Any cert subsequent assessment -hall be provide that in the event of | |'^°^3 3^essment hereunder shall be !-d\teV’a-a^nst-t\/rbse%u-nt-assess.ent. subd. 1. The certificate share of the cost of parcel evrieter^r^ll? fain, as ‘^e case "je^ia. thafnS'ins?a?Len« thereof are delinquent or permit (4-1-84) 44ORONO CC , % 'VREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 8, DITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 1995 Joint Use Dock License - Big Island Veteran’s Camp List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Application Big Island Veteran’s Camp has applied for a 1995 Joint Use Dock License and has paid the required late fee. The 1995 application indicates no changes from previous years. Staff has received no complaints regarding the Veteran’s Camp. It is our impression that activity at the camp has decreased in recent years. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by ____, seconded by ____, to adopt Resolution No._____ directing staff to issue a 1995 Joint Use Dock License to Board of Governors, Big Island Veteran's Camp. Vote: ___Ayes,____Nays. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO BOARD OF GOVERNORS, BIG ISLAND VETERAN ’S CAMP SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1995 TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfil! their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an amiual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 13th day of March, 1995. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE; Big Mand Veteran’s Camp Board of Governors Dock Address: Big Island - Record Lot #1 - 100 Big Island Agent; Emil Sulander (Chairman) Address: Box 598, Excelsior. MN 55331 Licensee is: Stamtory board/club or recreation group License Period - January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year ’s license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Sub-Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY, 1995 LowerJMainLake 8 8 16 (14 slips, 2 buoys under previous license) 8 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 E.\ceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Anv chan&es in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. Based on the 5 cabins and 25 tent-camping sites approved by City of Orono Resolution #2802, 8 slips are approved for the 1995 season per your application. 2. Future requests for additional i ips will be subject to City Council approval and shall be reviewed and considered in relation to the concurrent level of allowed camp activity. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any ves«ed right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. Xj X JO LjSOL- p: Big Island vstsrans Camp r=20' Do c.'it, \ /q'lS' - at) dec 1G 199Z . « C.D. ww2 Ye>, Uu/. c* —-•- ••• • .......... ScnCc * ^ <*v« ) .f,»<Sx;u ^xMte.\T‘ B>’f ^ r^nn^ T) l*x.k S^<uc1u4ici,^^-}5" _____ j) Pock ^f<bi»e-k a/J^y^ - /ja-f /fl pp» (.'e.»4 <s/i (prC^^ G''*y *l • U.'rtf k-c t//a ^ jU o A/c»j L, b#rt.v I I DOCK. ISLANDBig* PLANS veter AHs c/nnnP.• •§ •mm m • • *• • £/lbT IMG <x n 17?^ d fuTUK£ 5C.U-. /"• 2°‘ 3i.‘ / <1 Vfi . • . 5H <HoRtl LIK]E .5:* -» >• „';’';:j-1. /', .1( ,sl4ll.“> •", »,i>\ V4+V!..iH^*Uv An- dt*.«v tfHd . *-<'-^1 '■#1; «.xc«^A • •»;+K 4- Sf®vA^«. UMiis . l« ix*!'/ 2) ^nIs'flH^ C* "T n pfivvAAx* <H"t* ^ uj’.tU 1- • o ^fi t •j> «D IJ I: CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 LICENSE YEAR 19 ^ MAR 2 1995 ANNUAL JOINT USE DprK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff January 3. 1995 Date Application Returned to City Fee Received S ^ ^ ---------- engage or panfcipate in ... joint use (of any lakeshote property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND fOTM^ SIGNED^PUCATO^ ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. A.SSOCIATION INFORMATION 1. Association Utle or name (if any) T ake A//A4>CTg>A//<^_________ Bay ------------ TTTTT^ ir/i U MU 2. 3. t i.• »- tt. i- f .1 I- 4. Person responsible for this applij:ation: Name Phone MaUing Address Ey-Cei^mX,, Relationship to association Association is (check applicable items): unincorporated homeowner’s group. w* ft* tU*uM Tlt u 51a cTf r A «i YOU --------------- 1 /ii 03/iLwv'vi /ii-'i T'^‘- incorporated Homeowner’s Association. unincorporated club or recreation group. <Sr»7^ A^SfJC'J : incorporated club or recreation group. Page 1 of 5 * • 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): ____ provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock. ^ provide a club or association gathering place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member’s private property, easement or outlot owned in common. property leased by the group/association. group/association. HthAJS'Sc'TA' List Dock location and ownership information: Street address ‘ .....................— / Legal property description (Sf>ur. ^ ^ Se^c.. 23, / // 7 ^ R PID#______________________________ ^ -7- , Listed property owner(s) ftt-u ^ ^ Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: 'North/West' (Name + Address) 'SouthyEast (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners:J (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) Insurance Coverage - The jointly used dock is insured by one of the following: ____ property owner ’s homeowner ’s policy. separate group/association owned policy. List the following information: Name of insured I si -Ak^ -------------— Name of insurance carrier /hlSTUCAf^ . PniiryNn iSm Effective date of coverage Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence Public liability, per occurrence Page 2 of 5 10.Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable* items): fencing _____ security lighting ____ property owner’s presence contract security service nOCK INFORMATION 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline: 7^ ft. Length of main dock from shore: Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore. ----------— ft- ------ Dock Construction (check applicable items). ft. ft. 12. seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) ___ permanent piling with seasonal deck ____ petmanent piling and decking wooden decking ____ metal decking 13.List Dock Accessories: Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock Number of life preservers available at the dock----4^ 15. List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes boat lifts): Transient (day use only) slips )<5L Transient (day use) off-shore buoys --------- Permanent moorage slips Permanent moorage off-shore buoys-------- Dry storage (rack) slips ___________ Maximum number of boats at the dock------- List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. spaces. fhOSTON and sedimen tATTON CONTROL 16. Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items): strine rip rap ___ wood seawall ___ metal seawall concrete seawall grass and vegetation only ____other (specify) 17. Depth of water at shoreline: ft; at 50 ft. out: -----; at 100 ft. out. _e_ Page 3 of 5 REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. B. C. D. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shorelme width of this property the side property lines and the location, layout and dimrnsions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS_OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. >Wy WtBJ^ A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note- This copy is not required if the applicant initials and cenifies the following statement: •This is a r-n- wal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement onginally'made in _______(state year) and on file with the City.’ ___ Applicant’s initials TNrORPORATFn CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS . 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers 2. 3. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. ____ members A cenified copv of the anicles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note- These copiw are not required if the applicant initials and cenifies the following stalest: ■This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended m------------(state year) and on file with the City.* Applicant’s initials annual LirFNSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule $ $ INITIAL APPLICATION FEE renewal JOINT USE FEE, per year PT T T.S SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, liftj^dry stack, or buoy ^ slips @ 2.(X) each 5 20.M total dlt : this application $ -3.4, aO Page 4 of 5 LATE FEE - Renewals Application for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than March 1 of the license year. Ihe choii n.,, „-nPwal license application s n-reived after January 31 unless the application is accompanied bv a laie fee of $25.00. REVTEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Manna Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVaVL OF THE UCENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Siened Date Page 5 of 5 REQUEST FOR COUHCIL ACTION DATE; Match ,lo/lS|?5 ‘ ? *5 ITEM NO: / *J 0 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Establishment of Council Work Session There are several topics for which the Council may want to schedule a work session. These include: funding for the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail/5 year plan foi the use of MSA funds, the Highway 12 safety improvement project and the related agreement regarding construction and cost sharing related to the project, development issues related to the north side of Highway 12, and a potential ordinaiKe amendment related to the proposed adult shelter. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to establish the date, time and purpose of a Council work session. \ request for council action ^ DATE: March 2, 199^6,;,^ ITEM NO.: /'^ Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Easement Acquisition During the plannins for the location of the bike/hike trail from Baker Park to the Luce Line, it was determined tha't permanent and temporary easements would have to be acquired at certain locations alone the route of the trail. The property adjacent to County Road 6 from Old Crystal Bay to Homes~tead Trail is a property that we will need permanent and temporary easements. I have discussed the acquisition with the property owner and have agreed that the value of the easements is $1,288.80 for 5.370 s.f. of land. There will be no compensation for a temporary easement. It is recommended to purchase a permanent easement from Michael Seeland for $1,288.80 for the construction of a bike/hike traU adjacent to the property at 2940 Sixth Avenue North. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To authorize purchase of a permanent easement from Michael Seeland for $1,288.80 for toe construction of a bike/hike trail adjacent to toe property at 2940 Sixth Avenue North. Monies to purchase this easement should come from the Park Dedication fund. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10. IfITEM NO: /fo ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Spring CIcan-Up Dale and Fees The City’s annual spring cleanup day has been scheduled for Saturday, May 6. It will be held jointly with the City of Long Lake. In past years fees have been charged for all items brought to the clean-up day except miscellaneous refuse items. For example, a fee of $12.00 per cubic yard has been charged for construction materials which covers 100% of the city’s costs. In past years, the city has fully subsidized the disposal of miscellaneous refuse items. Due to budget constraints and to coordinate the fees with those charged by the city of Long Lake, it is recommended that a fee of $3.00 per cubic yard be charged for disposal of miscellaneous refuse items. COUNCIL AC ITON REQUESTED: Motion to approve the scheduling of the joint spring clean-up day on Saturday, May 6, and to authorize a fee of $3.00 per cubic yard for miscellaneous refuse items. request for council action ^ DATE: March 9, 1^ I-)ITEM NO.: | / Department Approval: Name John R. Gcrhardson Title Public Works Director Item Description: Highwood Nature Trails Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Works Recently Park Commission Member Susan Wilson addressed the CouncU regarfmg the use of tifra^r ™si™^ by^: Attached for your review is information regarding the purchase of and the proposed use of the property in 1971. As stated in her comments to the Council, the best way to make better use of the park is to provide for minimal vehicle traffic and identify the park with a typical Orono park sign. The following is a breakdown of costs: 1 . Parking lot construction Picnic table S2.000 (gravel surface) 480 8003. Park sign It is recommended to construct the parking lot and purchase a “hie and park “SJ “ amount of S3.280 and the funds to pay for the above items come from the Park Dedicat Fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve the improvements and purchases for Highwood Nature Trails for an amount of $3,2^3 and to pay for the above items from the Park Dedication Fund. TO:Richard Flint, Park Commission Chair and Park Commission Members FROM: John R. Gerhardson. Public Works Director DATE: February 3, 1995 SUBJECT: Highwood Nature Trails - Parking Lot Design Recently Susan Wilson Park Commission Member anended a Council Highwood Nature Trails. Susan indicated to the Council that as a result of a City survey, there is strong interest in open space and natural areas.go ------------------ * The Hivhwood Namre Trail was acquired in the 1970s and although trails were developed, the vehicles and one school bus. The loop desien will accommodate five vehicles and one school bus. This design is the most costly (in excess of S5.000) and requires excessive tree removal, filling and gra mg. # * MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ffEETINC HELD JUNE 16, 1971 Searles moved, Dorn seconded, that a salary adjustment ot S70 per month, retroactive to January 1, 1971, and a 550 por month or cost of living increase (whichever is highest; for 1972, be approved for the following Street Department employees: ’lotion. Ayes (3; Nays (0). John Gerhardson Thomas Dorrel Duanne Johnston Charles Spencer Page 3 SALARY ADJUSriENTS Street Department Searles moved, Dorn seconded, that the salary of Frank Mross be adjusted to an additional $.26 per hour, retroactive to January 1971, be approvedo Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Searles moved. Oberhauser seconded, , the 12 acre Kutz property, located at Highwood and County Road #19, be purchased tor a Village park at a cost of $14,000 payable as follows at St interest, with t e Village assuming 1971 taxes and granting the *“*** a lease for one acre, with payments as follows. $5,000 October 31. 1971 $4,500 December 31, 1972 $4,500 August 31, 1973 ;4otion. Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Searles moved, Dom seconded, that the Contractor’s Estimate #8, Metro Contracting, be paid. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Searles moved, Dom seconded, that the eontTKt withwith the Village be terminated and the Village Attorney, Village Administrator, or Mayor be authorized to send a letter this effect. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Searles moved, Dom seconded, that the fcllowing gas main permits for Minneapolis Company, be approved: Motion, Ayes (3) (0).Nays Job S-118 - 1971 Repair Job 1882 • Repair Job 1894 - . North Am Drive 8 Forest Ants Lane - Pee $15 1360 Rest Point Circle Togo Road SALARY ADJUSTMENT Sewer Department PURCHASE Kutz - PARK PROPERTY CONTRACTOR’S ESTIMATE 48 Metro Contracting TSR.MINATION ?fetro Contract c-p-r i K- % til »•« - .. .*. , ' T . \ ^ • it *V. . ^ .. • ••• **"• . • A- ^1 • I » * > i r - f ~ • I'ii ;';i 9 • % V .? »•*«. • ? \ j •t. < -»> ♦ ♦I •f 1 RIGHT OF ACCESS % The Village of Orono hereby grants to Lorens «• ^tz ofLo^9J^^ighwood,^^^<c^M^^net^ the following dfsc?Led property in Hennepin County, Minnesota: That part of the Southeast quarter Township 117 North, -^"5° 23 West of the 5t principal Meridian, ®Blolk if Sagathe Southwest corner or xxjt 9, BIock ij, g Hill Revised, according to the to P thereof; thence West axonj ®°“;*'_oiest said Block 13 and the South line Avenue and lot 9, Block 14, Saga Hill Revis^ , to the southwest corner o„ said tot , thence ijrHorthcalt «rner of SSt I: said Block 14; thence J P«P®"^ors4!4 l^ello i?rKesrUnfoftot P? Sfn?; Hlr?f i;ing “s^?S --1f^e tJ^^g^hwest !?jrof°Lis“4 ‘-an ‘d*;C-ilglrsSest^^^^ •tonka to its intersection wxth the Southvestoriy extension of the Northwesterly ime of said Lot S B?Icri3, laga Hill Revised; thence North- listerly along laid Southwesterly extensxon to the point of beginning; !'irLia?i\rti:rwcn“5rien oTL?%rH&. L&ke Minnetonka.. ilflof'?! Village of Orono By, Its Clerk-Administrator If* t; V . I • >r*... f*% t ir- , •• •' 1 1 I ( I I I .cii \; 6/C(C-wm- oA- Ptcg- »V-«" Coo^-n 0><Jfi.r t^i'^ . i5... 71. I _____________...nnn - ' ■■ ( I siaucrp^rx^ Hn^ tfi7Zoic. ZA* StaU of .._. Xiiuxesota , of ths iteond part. aiiMMti!.. r/u.. «u, «a/•* ‘mDolla>:...and other, w., „W mni o/ Cae Dollar and other. Good..emd...vai»9.PAe._W9nsA««*«,w*w..... doli^RS. to ' them " in hand paid by the party of tho oecond paH, the roetipt w^rtof u lur^ 1.i;^tedeed:do:::: Gram. Bargain. SeU. and Ue eueeeeeor, and aeeigne. Forever, all the tract .. . or parcel of la^ ll^rf and being in vu i,ouney of____Hennepin ...........................ond State of Minneeota. deeonbed ae followe, to-unt. S& rKFras s sir Highvood LaXe Minnetonka. ......and-.wif e#..................—ZiL~Zrml''i7f^e ?heir hdre exeeuiore and odminietratore, do.— vaH.lesof the firti paH, /<jr themselvcs# ^.AncMLone. «Aa«~..they.-jar.e..____veli ^venani xoitk the eaid party of the eecond part. Us HgJUto eeU and etmooy the same in mmiU.fm,fOulMito»iprrmim,aftrMd. ____ an of iXo kt•' * r t I-' k: r^.; * . » X. '• j’f,:; •'» si-'n IV. i K1 MM VILUGE OF ORONO Rei^lar Meeting of the Park Conraissio. October 17, 1972 Tlie Pfl'k Connission net on the above date with the following nenbers present: Chair- nan Ogland, Hallowell, Jarl, Lcipold, Mastny^ Panuska, Watson, and Wysocky, Absent: Ophexn, Stanke, and White. No neoting of the Park Comission was held in Septeicber due to a date ciiange. The Minutes of the regular meeting of August IS, 1972, were corrected as follows: Janes Gilbert, Naturalist, is charging the Village only $10P for his services on Highwood. Motion, Ayes (8) - Ways (0). Mastny made a layout of Hackberry Park and showed it to the Lions Club of Long Lake. T/iey have appointed a committee to work with us. Mastny will meet with the conaittee and bring in their ideas. They will work out a plan this winter. The Lions Club wants the Park Commission to put in the backstop and they will then try to pick up from there. They are concerned that a fence be added along Willow Drive. The backstop has arrived but some parts are missing and had to be back ordered. Benson will try to put it in as soon as they arrive. Ogland reported that the Village Council yt&nts to be loiowledgeable about what the Park Commision is doing. Therefore, we have a responsibility to plan carefully and to keep* tK?m informed. Ogland would like to invite Tom Loucks and Paul Fjare to come tv our next meeting so that we can review our id^as witli them. Wysocky walked through the Highwood area with Jim Gilbert and ho has tentatively laid out paths. He recommended that we call it Highwood Paths and not park. He suggested that we have a cul*de*sac at the entrance big enough for a bus to park and turn around. Benson prefers not working on the area until we have a hard freeze; however, we are anxious to work on the area this fall as people have been doing some dumping there. Benson will be there with Gilbert when th9 paths are laid, which they hope to do in November. Gilbert has made a list of plant and animal life that was available this fall. (Continued) 7:30 P.;i. MINUTES HACKBERRY PARK COCIUNICATION TO COUNCIL BRAUER n ASSCCIATES HIGHWOOD AREA Xfr u I ‘i.., ‘ . ir * , «?• I * < . hi MINUTES OF A REGULAR ^^EETING HELD OCTOBER 17, 1972 He will idd to ti. in the spring. He will nark the paths with an orange narking tape. There will oe a vista area and one small area for picnics. Gilbert noted that we have something very rare called a Pagoda Dogwood. He is most anxious that the front paths be developed. We also need to put down permanent stakes to show exactly what we own. This will possibly involve a survey. Wysocky has made a list of all expenditures and materials that will be required. Because we are getting Gilbert’s services so nominally, we have to adjust to his tine. If possible, wc will get some volunteer help, such as scouts, for laying the paths. Wysocky will look into this. Mr. Garcia at Northern States Power Company will iielp Benson get the wood chips for the paths. The cul*de-sac will be leveled this fall. Watson moved, Wysocky seconded, that the area be officiallly called liighwood Paths, Motion, Ayes (8) - Nays (0). Page HIGHWOOD AREA (Continued) HIGHWOOD PATHS Wysocicy moved, Mastny seconded, tiiat we accept the list of recommended expenditures for Highwood Paths. Motion, Ayes (8) • Nays (0). HIGHWOOD EXPENDITURES Ogland reported that Benson is waiting for the :;ruund to dry so he can get in there to level :he ground for the skating rink this winter. The question was raised if we could put teiwis courts in this area. This will be looked into. '^gland reported for Ophein. There will be^ i now fences put up on both ends of the Lydiard access as a safety factor because of tJie posts in there. Snow fences will also be posted on the access adjacent to Ophein*s property and nosted for no'snowmobiles. A letter from Jack Wenger which was sent to 5d Stanke was read expressing concern over^ the Commission's restricted use of the Lydiard access to swimming. The letter will be forewarded to Mr. Cosby so that Marc Whitehead can check on the whole legal description. Jarl moved, Panuska seconded, that the Park Commission recommend to the Village Council that ^ contribution of $500 be made to t«ie Minnesota Parks Foundation for tne preparation of a feasibility study for the Luce Line Trail. Motion, Ayes (8) - Nays (0). CASCO POINT mt LAKE ACCESSES LYDIARD SWIMMING TRAIL SYSTEM % 1 '' - S 9 J '- - -^-‘ PURCHASE AGREEMENT .Orono.. . . . .Minn,. .. . .. . . . .,1971.. RECEIVED OP The .Village of...Orono................................................................. the nun of Fifty, and no/100 ....?.......^ dollars ........................................„ «rte« money Mul in pwt pnymeot for P«d-K of ptoperty « lAAft ae W¥ielk| ................................................tinifticd i Hennepin ....................................... S»« of Min«e»«, nna le^y jearibed u follow^ .. ' f,Of» (Oieeh. CMfeer Orono 7hH County of i.i;s 66 and all of Lots 92, 93 and 94^in^The Easterly 25 feet of Lot thereof on Highwood, Lake Minnetonka, according Titles in and forand of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in ana lor said Hennepin County; Sout.Svest corner of lot ^ IV.'ofllia re/ised, then West to Southwest corner of £4, of ISeS''E«t'‘54'4/10*fMt”o Sent lin4 of lot 94, m"eton.a, then North rSSftSr*°'' to its intersection with the Westerly line Saga Hill Revised extended then Northerly to beg g« „..w «•> v,e,vw«.<e«e, «» Erom Buver to Seller per annum pursuant to the ^ g accrued interest, on providing for payments of $4,500, plu interest, on August 31, ??7l“^0ne^icre!^to'be determined by lona*M*thSL This agreement is “|S”days?'*^If^t**is^ot so accepted, li the. $50.00 earnest money. loitru.m? « perf0«n«« br tf» b«T« .he if IZ BaK(b) Rwtrictiom leU.m* w «* ®» imp.>J4.^nt o«'i 'isr-t ir„"ssis Tb* bum Ui.ll |«T tt« rr.1 ^. .. ____, tn ,lw WM |M» PWWT i. tlilfMt ZwiJw 4 m1I b« «N,4>4 « »J |» ,l» » S^im^I#la«M"=525.SS2S S*rCmIu»pm JuSITSutum ihM ,h, d.i* ol wrium ubimiom ss'.its s issiha'iits!._____— Aammaru turn brini • .. .ft... u —Mkimse m tllS ibt W ftH mm pfufwiTT ••^*7 . I lilt wutf mmf tgnn»f it nontht ftlm m*h npb* •***•• V*'^.__i. -.lU— «hich ftppwftl Krvs,’:.^'v '•/(.» •’■•' ■ ‘’’ . •. . V . ■!*> • . ■• 'V' ■ ;•■*; /t ■< ■*»' ‘ V*; •■' -■• •■'r y v.i-:‘C •''' . : . 'V . ’-V r'^v‘A ' t. V. k>’ jg.^- I>» •,*; •< ; 1 .'k4 // •. * •. ‘ . ■ I X _ • • • I . I - <' ^ “•J /*• . * * r .. V 'i . •;< • .• . • \ . • ^ \ : . • *'-• .••ft'. ,, . w f .sjiA i-Vei it »*•« ^ I ^ ’ .. • ‘41 1*. f ..IN § / J! * ~*^_________________________________________________________________*' ' ^*. 1^ * ^"» •' ■ ■■*" i f- A 1, rJ: f, % saissss^y• IIVn* ORONO PARK COMMISSION ' nioiiwron paths assi CiNMI-nt CONSULTANT - SIOO.OO expert naturalist for advice (see his prelUinarv Study) SURVEY - Objective, clearlv defined boundary lines with stakes to outline - - - - park area - cost unknown TAPE - for narkiHR artas through which paths are to be laid WOODCHIPS - for paths, free from N.S.P. TKO POSTS.CHAIN - to close drivew.iy from dumping - cost? unknown. Village men and equipment do it. • “aj“inknSl'-‘L?ur!:!is?'5Irej?ras ”Sa°ri Sfhis‘oHs[i; 'fee!”"’ TWO SION ADDITIONS - Village of Orono signs with ■•Highwood Paths” curved underneath - cosi unknown LISTS OF PLANTS S ANIMALS AND INSECTS, ETC. - Part of naturalist s g ment LABELING SIGNS - to indicate n.imes of some of the pl.ints along paths. Minimal cost ONE PICNIC TABLE f, BENCHES - for one picnic area plus bench for one - -^Ista. ApproximatclTTSO.OO next spring , • , . :.'/.% *►' . i L \i >'• . ^ j'T\*-i'^ ^ Ik* • • r’ w• * t- }• I- Sf >■ r>- »/ • w rr : - * T VtV. ORONO IlK'.in.OOi) PATHS (Iwclv. ;u rvb rox .-..‘•ide to Ici-rn tnd «T.;cy the sights , ?ci:ndi: r.id ^r.c lls c-f nsture)l: Fecornerdcd Uses of the Land 1. Entrance way two possibilities being considered 1 • 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1?. Parking lot - snail, room for about five cars, must have room for one school bus. Vi*-iiT<» trail - a trail is one of the nost effective n.ctbods ol Nature trail - a ^raii ^ r;r<t e\re’xcrtes ii- the oitdcors. and contemplate their immediate surroundings. Hopefullv the trail can be about cnt-half nilc long with cno two locps. One snail locp sl.ould te sclf-guiucrl (.coe.s for pi.aicS, Trail width aLot-t five feet. Koodchips for surface. Lunch areas - near center on highest ground. Maybe a fire ring and lavatory. You night want to allow scouts ano other small groups to camp overnight. Overnight tent camping - must be very icstrictivc. ObserviPs wild ricv-ets. r.i'.ivc shrubs and trees in a natural setting. Bird sanctuary A sanctuary for all wildlife * insects, raanunals, etc. Scientific observations and study - hopefully school groups will be able to use this area.able to use this area. Painting Nature photography Reintroduce missing native wile flowers and trees. Forest manacement practices - some cutting and clearing . tt be necessary to^eep this area truly b?inrway of rejuvenating our forests, so we must do something to onng back the diverse forms cf life. 14, In the future: a. Small group hikes led by volunteer naturalists, never more than ten students/naturalists. b. Tapping maple trees and evaporating over a woodfire. • ; (: I I k iim isi « v-4, •• . I.’t... ' ' Y V 4 m ^ ' • ?i. • Orono Forest Preserve Page 2 c.S‘;.;:K:!K‘r.,:;r;;i;r,:;■!!!»,;.;r.“'" " • d.ncnonsvri.tior coPfcst, pi Ic and organic garden. (Maybe Lorenz Kutr wotjld help do this near his proper yj. c.Small collection of plants that would provide bird food - crab appleSg honeysuckle, etc. f. Bird houses and bird feeding areas. Non-compatible Uses of this Land 1.Snowmobiles and other motorized vehicles. Also, the area is not large enough for horsts or bicycles. 2. 3. 4. 5. Ball games Trailer camping Outdoor playground Gener.**.! picnicking Jam.es R. Gilbert Naturalist, Carver County Park 6 the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Naturnllst is Jin Cilberz. He is • ircS«l?.«''fo?"‘‘ the University of Minnesota ig- because he is doingifv2i"Sn*r"5;iez?rg ?r?n”:ss; si -'i;turd.y noons or late summer evenings. The normal fee for this sort of thing is upward to J3.000. • * f \ * I T f » ■ « , i * H It •V.'A ?• - ' e a* r -- iT»' - -X ■ ^ 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 4 DATE: March 8, 1995 . ITEM NO.: I ^ /. ‘“-V. n ^'^0 Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Community Development Block Grant Program 1995 At the February 27th Council meeting, the Council conducted a public hearing regarding the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds for 1995. The total amount available for 1995 is $23,918. After hearing comments from the public, the Council proposed the following allocation contingent upon approval from Hennepin County Planning and Development: Activity WeCan Westonka Intervention Interfaith Outreach Community Partners Sewer Connection Grant Sojourn Housing Rehabilitation $ 1,500 1,800 1,500 3,000 1,500 14,618 Following the public hearing, 1 discussed the allocation pf funds with Hennepin County Planning and Development, and was reminded that we are allowed only 15% of the total amount for public service agencies. The increase of $300 to the Westonka Intervention program exceeds the allowable to 20% and after a review of the county-wide allocations, we may only be allowed to designate $1,500 to them. They also stated that "Sojourn" could not be funded as it was way over the allowable amount. Therefore I have prepared an amended resolution for Council review and approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution to approve the allocation of the 1995 CDBG funds, resolution approving projected use CON?TnS?^ DEI^LOPMENT block grant PROGRAM WHEREAS the Citv of Orono, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement wi^^n County, (s cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Communtty Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS the City of Orono has developed a proposal for the of Urban Hennepin County CDBG filndr made avaiiabie to hoS anJ ar;;^riues'r aty s pro^sed use of S23.9.8 from the' i995 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. nv IT rf SOLVED that the City Council of Orono approves the following the 1995 Urban Hennepin County Commumty Development Block Grant Progr . Activity We Can Westonka Intervention Interfaith Outreach and Commumty Partners (lOGP) Housing and Rehabilitation Sewer Connection Grant Budget $1,500 1,800 1,500 16,118 3,1•iw Adopted by the City CouncU of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meetmg held this 13lh day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % V DATE: March la, 4S95 % ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator //4 Administrator’s Report Item Description: Ordinance Amendment Regarding Animal Noise Attached is a memo from Lt. Cheswick outlining the need for a change in the city ’s noise ordinance related to animal noise and a recommended amendment to the current ordinance to address this need. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the proposed ordinance amendment regarding animal noise. I DATE: TO: FROM: 3-10-95 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Lt. CheswicJc SUBJECT: Barking Dog Ordinance In 1994 Orono City Prosecuting Attorney, Laurel Hersey, informed us that the Edina animal noise ordinance, which was virtually the same Orono^s ordinance, was found to be unconstitutional by the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Laurel strongly suggested that we change our ordinance, that she would send us a copy of Edina's new ordinance for us to review. The following is that language: Noise Subd. 1 Disturbing Peace and Quiet. No person owning, operating, having charge of, or occupying, any building or premises shall keep or allow to be kept any animal which shall, by any noise, unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet of any person in the vicinity. The phrase "unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet” shall include, but is not limited to, the creation of any noise by any animal which can be heard by any person^ including the Animal Control Officer or a law enforcement officer, from a location outside of the building or premises where the animal is being kept and which animal noise occurs repeatedly over at least a five minute period of time with one minute or less lapse of time between each animal noise during the five minute period. Subd. 2 Complaint. Any person may call or deliver a complaint to the Animal Control Officer stating facts and circumstances of an alleged violation of this Subsection. J*"® Animal Control Officer shall investigate such complaint. If a violation occurs in the presence of the Animal Control Officer, a summons may be issued. If probed>le cause of a violation exists, which violation did not occur in the presence of the Animal Control Officer, all reports, witness statements and evidence may be submitted to the City Prosecuting Attorney for a formal complaint. orono's existing ordinance relating to dogs barking is under "Other Unlawful Acts" #9.12 Subd. (4), and reads: "fail to keep his dog from barking, howling, or whining or emitting loud or unusual noise.” Given the enclosed information, I recommend that the City of Orono adopt the seune language as that of the City of Edina's noise ordinance providing us the necessary enforcement standards. o ) Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone (612) 939 8266 • Fax (612) 939-8248 Cily Allorncy’s Office 4- mher 28 1994 />nn i<iir)> rn>sn tiliati St-irkTs fi>r itw Cilit'S nf: ^ * t\finiui()iikii, Miiinclonkd ihvi'h. )^tiniieiiV ‘tii. Ms. Susan Sumey ()rtmn,nul St. lUmifoaits 1330 Cherry Place Mound, MN 55364 Re* Report of Barking Dogs, co orono Police Department Case #946158 Dear Ms. Sumey: . a- • iron that we have reviewed the police This letter is to mfor J - barking dogs on September 14, reports relating to your ^eP initiate charges relating to that 19I4 , and have decided not to ini^^te charg^^^ Minnesota court incident. The reason r-onctitutionality of the barking dog decision cast doubt on the orono. The City of Orono is ordinances of many which will address noisy animal working to adopt a ^^institutional limitations set forth® by “t'lfe ®c\®urts°r'’lt you have any questions regarding this, plGas© call inG. Also for your information, we have also police reports ?SrJ°it:re ®a^ ^ct^mlntrc%^rn\n^n^®:o^^n%c^?ioi^^Ath that matter. J { *k\ I C)\r~o OO • • S 9.12 less than five regular business days. A "regular business day" is oL during which the Pound is open for business to the public for at least four hours between 8:00 o'clock A.M. and 7:00 o'clock P.M. Imooundraent records shall be preserved for a minimum of six months and shall show (1) the description of the animal by specie, breed, sex approximate age, and other distinguishing traits; (2) the location at which the animal was seized; (3) the date of seizure; (4) th6 nan\e and address of the person from whom any animal three months of age or over was received; and, (5) the name and address of the person to whom any animal three months of age or over was transferred. If unclaimed, such animal shall be humanely destroyed and the carcass disposed of, unless it is requested by a licensed educational or scientific institution under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 35.71. Provided, however, that if a tag affixed to the animal, or a statement by the animal's owner after seizure specifies that the animal should not be used for research, such animal shall not be made available to any such institution but may be destroyed after the expiration of the five-day period. Subd. li. Other Unlawful Acts. It is unlawful for the owner of any dog to (1) fail to have the license tag issued by the City firmly attached to a collar worn at all times by the licensed dog, or (2) own or keep a dog which is dangerous (any such dog which has caused injury to persons or property shall be deemed "dangerous"), or (3) interfere with any police officer, or ©jner City employe^ in the performance of his duty to enforce this Section, or p) fail to keep his dog from barking, howling or Shining, or fTom emitting loud or unusual noise, or (5) tail to prevent his dog from defecating in or upon public property or tne premises of another, or (6) “permit - solid waste of a ® '•accumulate on his premises for more than twenty-four hours. Subd. 12. Immobilization of Dogs. For the purpose of enforcement of this Section any peace officer, dog catcher or other person assisting a peace officer or dog catcher may use "a so-called tranquilizer gun -nr other instrument for the purpose or immobilizing and cacching a dog. Subd. 13. Warning of Vicious Dogs. The owner of any dog known to be of vicious habits shall place in plain view t^e entrance to his premises a sign no smaller than 12 inches oy inches which shall read; "Beware of Vicious Dog". SEC. 9.13. ANIMALS AND FOWL - KEEPING, TRANSPORTING, TREATMENT, HOUSING. Subd. 1. Definitions. As used in this Section, the following definitions shall apply. A. "Owner" -‘ Any person who owns, harbors, feeds, hoards, keeps, or otherwise possesses an animal, and who is head of the household of the residence, or the owner or manager ORONO CC 203 (4-1-84) C * memorandum 0 TO; FROM: RE: DATE: Lieutenant Gary _o»., YJH TAX a73"51g?r ^ PAQEB TOTfth Rolf A. sponhoia, As.lstsnt City Attorney „f r.t11r-l '■■»■ Prehei. <5* H.W.2d 62 (IlSk of Appeals Decision =n ConstitutloJrality of Barking Dog ordinances) August 25, 1994 Enclosed as you requested .** ttJf*cas'e in which 2irnl “t“^lfTou r.rary call ns. 0 20 Minn.” ^S1 NORTH WE3TKUN UKPORn’R, 2J SFItlKSSUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTADECISIONS WITHOUT PUBUSHEI) OPINIONS Apitcal from Tllle Ooekel Number Dale DUtxmIUoo llotsarl V. Sieve Turnbull Ma- C9-90-385 4/30/90 Affirmed Johnson V. l*ord Me lor Co...C4-90-4')4/18/90 Affinoed johrison v. Morris ................C8-8!-26l4 4/18/90 Reversal and Rc* momlcJ ;osk V. Pioneer Enji. oeering/Ponec. Inc..............Cl-90-11 4/19/90 Affirmed Lapp* V. Regency Manor Kurv- Ifawrwam ...................................• 4/13/90 Affircncd Workers’ Competv sjiion Cl. o( Ap peals Workers* Compen- wit ion O. of Ap peals Tax a. Kclle>\ J. Workers' Compeii- satioQ Cl. of Ap peals Workers* Coinpcn- saliofi Ct. of Ap- peals riTY OF KI>1NA *. liUtHFU K.WJa w« (»«^»»CITY OF KDINA. UrsponJent,*.Koger II. DKEIlKIl, Appellant No. C7-«»-192«. Court of Xpl'oab of MinnosoU. April 21. im Review DcnHxlJunc 15, IMO. 1. Conililutioool Low «=*W) .Mookipol CorpormlioM Culy orilinaoce U«»t probibil^ keepmc of animal lhal "by any noite dislu^ Ibe p.>aee ami Aoicl of persons in Ihe vtrmily dkl not provi<l« adequaie notice or ade«i«*l« slniidanls to pervent arbilrao' eofore^l and therefore violaled uue proce** of bw. US.C.A. ConstAmendi. 5. M; M^A. Const Art 1. S f. 1 Syllabus by tks Court City ordinance that prohibiUtI owning an animal that "by any noise Defendant was eonvicied in Uic Dis trict Court Hennepin County, James D. Rocers. J., of violaling city ordinanee pro- aninuu uv»* ------ . . . « hibitine Uie keeping of an an.mal whkh of persons in Ihe newniy "by anv nouse disturbs the peace and lurct jy ^ prorMc adeqoale notice or adequai* of any* persons in the vicinity" and was to prerent arbitrary enfoie^l assessed J30 fine, plus court costs. On tlierefore violales due proce» of law-SSS€SSCd #01/ line* piu:> vv J It I appeal, the Court of A;>|ieab. Randall. J, held thnt ordinance in question was uncon stitutionally vague in that it dkl not provide adequate notice or adequate sundards U» prevent its arb.uary enforcement. ReversetL Hubert II. Humphrex. NI, Ally. Gen^St Paul. Marshall Hslbcrg. David J. McGw. Thomsen, Nybeck I aw Firm. Edutt. for respoudenL Steven D. DcRuylcr, Leonard. Street & Oeinard. Minneapolis, for appellant. Coiwnkred and decided by f^ANDALU PJ, and FOLEY, and CARDERRINC. L Consiitui’ion«l Law «^251.4 Mufilclpel Corporalioni ^55k<2) City onlinanoc mi»t meH. due pci>ccss « sUiulanls of definiLencss under both Fed- JJ. oral and Stiic Consliluiwns. U5C.A. ConsLAmends. 5. U. M.S.A. Const Art 1. §7- 2. Constitutional laiw «»251.1 Monicipol Corporations •=*591(2) —n — - , , . In order for city ordinance U> meet due p^ibiLs a persori from ke^^ oroecss suorlards of definiteness, persons ^hkh by any noi« ^ Sf^mon inUlligcncc must not be left to of pe«on, guess at meaning of ordinance nor difte aiifues that the city ^ application. U-S.C.A. Lowt jue process of U«. We reverse. FACTS On August U. 1089.»» Edina oommunity officer was dispalehed by the P®**^ mcnl to answer a dliten'a complsml IW a • •_____a ak^ Waaa»*JI JhC OPINION RANDALL. Judge. Thk is an appeal from j^Knu^t >591(2) appellant for violaling a city ordinance lhal U> meet due pruhibiLs a peraoo from keeping nersotis K« anv noise disturbs the to itB ---- Amends. 5. 14; M.S.A. Const Art 1. S “I. a. Municipal Cori/oralions «»t22(4). 59112) Where fundimcnUl rights were no a a^ * auten s oonn>»M*v •>••-» - involved in vagueness challenge U> aly o^ |u»rking at the house of appelhnl dinance. challenge had to be Upon reaching the houae. light of defendant's actual [J,, ,,1 in his vehkie and from tbwl fendanl had to Trove cnnsUlutional v 1 ^ ,p,*HanU dog Uon beyond a rea-vinahle doubt L -. . - . leaving, Ihe offieer left a ronsl.Amends 5. H; M.S.A. Const. Art. 1. hark, liei re *..........^ Minu.\Oin*n WESTKKN KKrOltTEll. 2J SKIilES-nane*. Number 312, f 2Ki) (f)ec. 2.I), which provides;0 person owning, opcraUng, having urge of or occupying any buiMing or x'mbes sliall keep or allow to be kept ly animal whkb shall by any oowc dis- irb the peace and quiet of any persons . the vicinity thereof. wo da>*9 later another complaint was ic about appelhiit's dog by a second vidual. The same community officer iped near appeibnt's hotoe and lisiened about 10 minutes while the dog borkwl officer testified that on lliia second ksion he ooald hear barking and also "a ‘ling or whining type noise.’' The offi- further testified that it was s higher |uency and the "frequency and consist- V* were disturbing." He testified that dog barked about every 10 seconds for roximately 10 minutes, he officer then issued s formal citation i|)pellant for violating the Edina ordi- ce. At trial neither of (he original com- .nants were called, and the city's rase Lcd on solely on the officer's testimony, pr trial to the court, appellant was con ed of violating Uie fldina ordinance and essed a $30 fine, plus court costs. ISSUE >oes Edina City Ordinance, Numl»cr 312. 9(j>. as applied to appellant, violaU: due «v8S of law? ANALYSIS V]ilicllinl MSStrXs that Edina Gty Onli- »cc. Number 312. $ 29(j}, is unconsblu- tially vague as applied to him and Ihcrci- deprives him of due process of law. 1,2] Tilt Edina ordinance musi meet e process standards of dennilcncss un- r both the Um'ied States Constitution and * liinnesou Constitulicn. State v, •icslroffU 3T1 N.W.2d 5*25, 528 (Minn. 85). Persons of common inlclligcncc The entire onliaiace readi: Kr» penofi. im any public or private place, ♦hall miage ia. or prepare, aiicmpl. offer of threaten to engsgc In, or aiaiit nr conspire u'iih another to enfaff in or conf»tTr.^tr roust not be left to guess at ll>e meaning of the ordinance nor differ as tn its applica- tiofi. /(I The purposes of the void for vagueness doctrine are to ptit people on notice of what conduct is prohibiietl aiKl, more importantly, to discourage arbitrary and discfiminatoo* enforcement. Ao- lendcT i*. Ixmon, dSl VS. 352. 357, 103 S.CL 1855, IH5H, 75 L.l-M,2d SK)3 (1583). |3I When fundamc rights are not involved, as here, vagueness cliallcnges must l« esamirKJtl in light of the defen- lUnt's actual comlucL State r. Becker. 351 N.W.2d 323, 925 (Minn. 1981). Appclhml must show that the ordinancsc **lucks speci* fjci^ as to his own behavior and not as to some hypothetical situation.** Stale v. Ka- ger. 382 N.W.2d 287. 289 (Minn.CUVpp. 1986), peL for rtf. denied (Minn. April 24, 1986). Appeliani must prove a constitu tional violation lieyond a reasonable doubt Kio Vista Son^FrofU Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 335 N.\V.*2d 242, 245 (Minn.1983) appeal dismissed, 464 US. 10;i3, 104 S.Ct. 690, 79 LEd.Zd 158 (1984). I-I I Respondent contends the phrase **disturb tiie peace and (iuiec‘ has a well accepted, generally understood meaning so that when applied to appellant's conduct, it meets tlie constitutional slamlard. \Yc dis agree. Respondent cites three cases for Rupport. In Stale v. Johnson. 282 Minn. 15:1, 163 N.W.2d 750 (1968). Vietnam war protesters disrupted the Miniica|iolb Aqua- tcnnial parade by climbing lamp posts, Rhoutirig, and distributing Icanets. Charged with violating a MinneaiwUs onli- nance that punishes **conduct which disr Curbs the peace and ifuiel,** Uie protesters clialicnged Uic ordinance on vagueness grounds.' The supreme court rejected the challenge, reasoning that the defendants w*ere aware of the nature of the cliargcd offense, that is. creatirg traffic congestion during a parade. Johnson. 282 Minn, at 159, 163 N.W.2J at 754. Similarly, in an- rofidticl. art of violence, or any olher conducl which diuurbi ihc peace and quiet of sooih^ MTC for parlicipaJinK in a rcc50Kn>rcd aiWclic contcsi. Johniott, 2S2 Minn INS n. I. 163 N.W.M at 7S3 n. I (qi»o4inx MinncApolis Code • I .-■•i •*. • • d * .-jl = 1' • • --4 •F * • •i." <1 f t f ft tn ri« /i\ . . C /I •V .1 r . •Vt ft. : . \ CITY OF KIHNA v. DHKIIKR0«c u N.WJJ 411 IVWt 623olhcr case. Iho supreme court affirmed a ronversaUM?^Uo^ indu.le i--rson$ conviction under llic same ordinance wlicn I who. because of Uieir love of peu, have ak the defendant enlere<I a church during a / extremely liigh tolerance for barking dogs‘ * 4 *______ ____a_reverential part of the service. beraU-d a clergyman, and refused to leave. Stale r. Ohan. 287 Mini*. :WX). 301-€2. 178 N.W.2J 230, 2:11 (1070). Finally, in 1973 the au- preme court rejected a vagueness challenge to MinmStaL § 009.703(3), the unlawfu) as serably aUtule, when protesters disrupted operation of a restaurant by blocking en trances and damaging properly.* Stale r. flipp, 2M Minn. 81. 89-90. 213 N.W.2d CIO. 6i:,-l6 (1073). Respondent's reliance on these eases is mispbiccd Unlike Johnson. Olson, and llipp where clear observable dev.^jit con- and mewing cals, or do we go by the iun dards of those who aUoagly dislike any prt wUliin a rcaidcnlial area? T)*e ordinanev as written gives no gnidanoe to the ^t owner, the neighbor, or tlio investigating officer an to what is allowable barking and wliat » not. I — Ucsidcs failing la pul appellant on notice of wlal fxmduct is prohibited, the ordi nance invilea arbitrary eoforoemcni. A city may enforce ordinances that reason ably specify what conduct is prohibited. However, it may not enforce an ordinance Hipp where clear observable dev.^jit c^- violation may entirely depend upon duct occurred, appellant's compliance with not a police officer is annoyed." the ordinance hinged on the officer’s per- rinri^nniL 402 HA 611. 6U. 91 w ^rW------------- • the ordinance hinged on the officer’s per sonal sense of annoyance over t)»e sound of a natural act, a dog barking, niockiiig traffic, disrupting a cburch bcrvice, or in terfering with a business are unusual acts, and may be understood by ordinary people of otMumon intelligence as disturbing the peace. Here appellant wav k-fl to guess wlicthcr his dog'.v barking dLsturlicd others Coates V. Cinrinnati, 402 UA 611, 614,91 S.Ct 1686. 1C88. 29 KEd.2d 214 (1971). Yet this is precisely what this Edina ordi nance does. Decausc tlie <.ity failed U» in troduce any evidence from the original complainants who reported appellant’s dog barking, the question whether appellant vr elated tl»o ordinance depended entirely on the officer's IhreshhokI of aniKqrance.* ta U.C «o.itr. I*. .nlnuiH. o«.nttUn« >k. Edi~ K. JH.1.1 u. d.. P~- cniM Ui« l«vel «fl,o dog • l»rk ......... „ mom kb Wig. ____________________________ - Tlie key woidS'lii ttie ordinance are "by any i*oisc disturb the peace and quiet of any persons in Uie viciiiity." Who does llial mean? Does that include several month oW babies which may easily lie dis turbed and cry at any .strange sound? Does it include the ekkrly or anyone wlm Ls extremely sensitive and claims to be dis turbed by any noise above Uie normal hum ^ The sialule pravuics in part: When thrre nr mofr penkons a«mb)r. each person is fuihy of unlawful assembly which is a niisdcmcant>r, if il»c assembly is; * * * Without lawful purpoie. but llte participanls so conduct themselves in a hsortlctly manner as lo disturb or ihfcalcn Ihc public pcaor. IHpp. 29S Minn. al S2. 213 N.WJd M 612 (qualing Minn.SiaL § 609.705(3». X Edina Cily Of Jtnaooe Mumber 312. 5 2*)(k) proridcf ihal before an officer may Irsue a citaiion he umisi personally invcsIiRatc the cir cumstances fr»rinin*{ ih^ hacK of the mmplaini. As reMMindcm es|»l.iineJ ii. ihis riN|uirrmrnt is ...I.,.-.. i» «..»• •!.« »»r -» cess of law and therefore we reverue his conviction. Wc noio that Uw WasliingUMi Supreme Court recently addressed this same issue involvin;? simflnr facU and s paralM ordi- nance. See City of Spokitne p. AtscAer, no \Viuh.2d 541, 754 VM 1241 (1988). In 'ischrr. ihc ordinance provided for convic- a dog were permitted to **ikstuHi or another person or neighbor by fre- policr officer between two acighbofs and. in ihetwy. shouia help irrcea nuisance calls from neighbors involved in a petty backyard tfiiciuic. However, when the pnarcuting ambnrilies made ilic dodvfon not fo call either of the two original mmpUinadiis tn identify by diieci evi* tience what they heard and csbserv^ ihe city. even iliougli encouraging poliSencss and gaod manners between ocigbbori^ defibmiely de prived Itself cl Its best cvidctior. fVoieniling auilioriiies always have the privUege of except ing wiinciset from tlirir case In chief, but they at<o aet^pt ilie risk that their exw weaker. II /*r I • -».4 Minn.* oimi wj:stkiln KKi*<mri:K. 2d skiuks i. • I •v^.I or habitual yelping or b;irk-Id. ai 343. 7S1 P.M at 1241. The «. held the ordinance was unconstitu* lly va^cue. li reasoned that because ikm of the ordinance tume<l on the iibofs ’ level of tolerance or intolerance larkinf. .in avera|*c person of common ii^LMice could noc determine pmliihitcd ucc We find llie reasoninf^ by the t in rnrher logical and fiersuasive, and >t it in this case. DECISION •lina City Onlinance, NiimlxT 312, kg) is ui>conf.ututM>nal)y vague as ap- I to appellant and dc|>fivcs him of liuc •ess oi law. eversed. (o 5 MTMtMMfSfiNMy ST.4TE of Minnesota, Rcsp<indenl, V. Wmiam C. ERICKSON, Appellant No. C-l-419-1227. Court of Appeals of Miiinesola. May 1, 1900. Review Denied May 23, 1990. Defendant was convicted in .he Dis- iCt Court, Hennepin County, H. Peter Al- ecKt, J., of sexual abuse of a child and he i]¥^€iL The Court of Appeals, WozniaV, J.. held that: (1) it was not error to vclude defense testimony concerning ,udy of unwanted children and psychologi- i) theory of learned memory, and (2) evi- jnee was sufficicnl to sustain the convic- 1. Coff^slUutkMUil Law i->26b(10>Tlie due process right to present a defense b Uie right to present the defendant's version of the taels as wd! as the proscrcution's to the jury so it may dixide wlicrc llie truth lies. U.S.C.A. OinsL Amend. 14. 2. ConsUltttional Law e»2^ll>) Exclusion of irstimony regarding Chechoslovakian study of uiiwajitcd chil dren and testimony regarding psycliologi- cal theory of IcameiJ mciuor>* did not vio- btc dcfetidani's due process righU in prosr ecution for sexual altusc of a child, where tl»c defense tlieory thai Uie victim was coerced \nUt telling a suggested story of .sexual abuse was prescnletL U.S.C.A. Const. A mend. 14. 3. Criminal l>aw ^469.2 Admis-sibilily of expert testimony b within sound discretion of trial court. 4. Criminal Law c^333(7) Even when helpfulness re<juircment for admbsion of cxjiert testimony is met, trial court may exclude testimony on the basis that its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfa*: prejudice. 30 W S.A., Rules of Evul., Rules 403. 702. 3. Cnminal Law 0=.487 Trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding, for lack of foundation cstalp ILshing Uiat child concerned was "unwant ed" and limited relevance to American club dren, proffered defense testimony concern ing Czechoslovakian study which tracked children who were unwanted by their moth ers, offered by defeiidarit to show Uiai child who accused him of sexual abuse was vnilnerable to suggestions by her moUicr because she was an unwanted child. 6b Criminal Law ^171.3(1) Trial court did not abuse its discrclioa in excluding testimony on psychological theory of learned versus actual memory, offere<l by defendant charged with sexual abuse of a child, because of its (xitential for iinibilv infliH'iirinr the jury's cn*<iihilily ile- VI - u i* a •r; % 5? -.■f s ‘C:I•-0 V.i /• ««• *«•» CM. N-KJ4 «♦ 1*^7. Criir»in»l Ijiw ♦-*474J(I>Expert testimony rvganiing IniUi or falsity o* witness* xUcjjaiion is not admissible.• •Hs Criminal I*aw €=»1139.2(1)If the piry. giving due rc^rard for the prrsutnpcion of innocence ami the State's OPINION 0 IWOZNIAK. Chief Judge.AdpeUont William C. Eriekson wa« coi»- vicled of efiminal sexua. conduct in violation of MiiuiiiUL $ 609 U2. aubd. 1(a) (I'JRS) in connection with the sexual abuse of Kb girlfriend’a then eighlyear-old » m • A t. Crimiaal La* ^1144.17(3. 6) Reviewing court a*tulrues the record most favorably U> the Stale when review ing the verdirl and assumes the evidence in V ........................ — • burden of proving g»iilt beyond a rea.v>n- 11.11. On ap()eal, Erickion able doubl, could reasonably conclude Hal trial couK's refusal In ad- dcfsnd.ml was proved goilly. iu verdict teiUmony on a psychological will not be di.Hiurl)cd. theory which recognizes a distinction be tween "learned memory ” and mcmoiy of aclu.il evcoU ami on a (bechoslovakiail stmly of unwanted children violated hil in|; viu.- —- _______ right to present a defense. Erickson afcso supporting the conviclioo was believed and claims that Uie evidence b insufficient to sustain his conviction. We disagree and affirm his conviction. FAcns In April 198«. Erickson was living with hb girlfriend. DJI., her daughter. If.II, and her five-yeais>ld son. D.H. told a friend that the suspected Erickaon of sexu ally abusing II.II. and asked her to talk to the contrary evidence was disbeUeved, es- peebUy where resolution of the case de pends on cwnlradiclory testimony. !•. InfanU «>20 Victim's testimony was sufficient to Etulain defendant's cimvktion for sexual abuse of a child, notwithsUnding evidence that story had Itocn suggested to the child bv oUmmts. Syllabux by the ( ouH ^ conversation, OJl. 1. Trbl court did not err m exc udmg ^ ^ e*i«rt testimony regarding psychological Erickion had touched her ihcory of "lcanic*l metnoo' »nd a sooolog- earlier wlule everyone else waa gotm. H.H. also 4oW him that Erickson had touched her four or five timea begin ning after Chrisunas 1981. D.H. dariricd that the last time Erkkson watched H.11. while D.U. was gone was on April 8, 1988, H.IL next ulked to Sergeant Camie Ii^ vine, nn invesligutor with the MiimeapoKs Police Dcpnrtmenl'a Child Abuse UniL The interview was videotaped and portions were admitted inUi evidence. Irvine used ical slutly of unwanted chikiren. 2. The evidence b sufficient t4i sus tain Erickson ’s conviction of first degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.SUL { S09.342, Bubd. 1(a) (1988). Hubert II. Ilumplirey. HI, Ally. Gen., Thomas L. Johnson. Hennepin Onmly Ally, and Lba A. Rcrg. AssL County AUy., Minneapolb, for rcsiHmdcnt. ------------------------ Jolm M. Stuart, State Public Defender anatomically correH dolb during the inter and Susan UP. Ilauge. AssL Public De- view. II.H. described three separate ina^ fender, Minneapolb, for appeIbnL William G. Erickson, Stillwater, appellant pro se. Considered and decided by WOZMAK, CJ.. and PARKER and SCIIUI-TZ.* JJ. ITHJW. aa.aa. ----------------- . dents. She dkln't know precisely whem the incklcnu occurred, but described them as beginning in January 1988 and ending on Aiwil 13 when Erickson was arrested on an unrclaletl matter. H.II. slated that he had touched her with his fingm on her anal, a «...... i„.i,1..- r.mr. I.r An*caK bv ap- peioim^nt piffv.>»nl U> Minn. Cowl. art. VI. § •• * Date:August 25, 1994 To:Chief Sullivan From:Lt. Cheswick Re:Barking Dog Ordinance nn a/17/94 Citv Attorney Laurel Mersey informed roe that ’ a decent Supreme court decision on a Edina city ordinance relating i-o harkina doas (which was the same as Orono's)/ was round to be ?oo vl^e^nd’unccnsUtutional. She feels it is necessary for orono to "re-do" the City's noise ordinance. T sDoke later with City Attorney Rolf Sponheira, indicating I had a copy of the City of Edina's new ordinance dogs. Rolf indicated it was the bevt ordinance of all those i*evi.6wed rolatGci to this matter. It is my suggestion the City of Orono adopt this ordinance relating to noise, providing the necessary standards for enforcement. J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON 'I ' < DATE- March 10, ITEM NO; 0 Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Septic System Installer A-Nonhem Cesspool Co., Inc. Brooklyn Park MN Hayes & Son Excavating Montrose MN Patnode Bros Rogers MN Sullivan’s Utility Services, Inc. Wayzata MN Volkenant Inc. Maple Plain MN Residential Kennel License Rene ’ & Patricia Stemau 440 North Arm Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve licenses. nTrnunNro - • " septic system installersCITY Ur UKUiNU ^ . license application (612) 473-7357 -j 2750 Kelley Parlo ’ay, P.O. Box 66 . ... Crystal Bay, MN 55323 - u T icense fee bond. Certificate of Insurance and evidence of MPCA . cinSoa ZcM.' AU applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. J. Business or trade name C .^A'C - Busutess address BusinessphoneRcsMencephone m.i------------ N^e of applicant or company teptesentative(s) holding MPC.A cettification --------------------------------------------------------------- i... .. r-.nitv.tion held: ^.Installer :k^mper Expiration date: /A ^ ----- 6. •ft Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? ^ Most recent year ---------- 7.Have you ever WTiere? had a license revoked? When?..--------- %,‘A f f Wl UJ WMUt 8. 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes ------- Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes — No No ^ iWA X w'VVV'W . >----------. t. U i- m i I •kXmU L' 1 ouiV•-rrv*IL w* • ' WV' « ’ hLlIPT-T^^K YCi 4'nOl^O IVi/'i tSir’L'/. I A ; V submittals REQUIRED: ^ ?: l°0OT.OT"SLe'’a'id“Fi^™it5on^ of °™"0 as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted, 16 3. 550-100-300,000 minimum Certific^ of Insur^ce. ,D>P' » ^ Copv of current MPCA Certificate.X licenses wtll not be processed until all items are submitted List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of of Minnesota and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the bta and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. CITY Staff recommendation: Approval USE Reason for denial: ONLY City Council Action: Date Date license mailed_____ Approved Denied CITY OF ORONO „ , r \9afiPTic system installers (612) 473-7357 LICENSE APPLICATION 2750 Kelley Parkway. P.O. Box 66 ^ Crystal Bay, MN 55323 All questions must be answered. License fee. bond, Certificate of Insurance and evidence of MPCA Cenification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. Business or trade name Business address .36 ? S£ fdor^j roS&-----jVn {Street) Business phone ~/7 4» (city) (lip) Residence phone ^ "7 <^ ~ 3 Si^/ 4. Name of applicant or company renresentative(s) holding MPCA certificationne of applicant or company r^resentai E> raA /-/(xy ^ ^ 5. 6. 7. Type of certification held; ^Installer _ Pumper Expiration date: Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? ________ Most recent year _______ Have you ever had a license revoked? /VO When?_______________________ Where?___________________________________________________ 8. 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes ____ No No t rrv rv ro~>\>n Will l-'l tx*' (1U .. h,!.jvviL**^ i'l’FICE f »f f *•/»» i *.*i i !-*L A VV'V* «■; CLi SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: r.-| w*V • ^ I » w*Vur'iit.A iL YO.. LuOi IfOl h v2.-\ ^1. $50.00 License application fee. 2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. ^ 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.(3itp» 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant w ho are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date ^ ^ Applicant’sSignature CITY Staff recommendation: Approval USE Reason for denial: _________________ ONLY City Council Action: Date____________ Date license mailed »♦♦»♦»♦♦♦♦♦»♦♦♦♦♦♦♦**♦♦******♦****** Denial Date ~------- Approved Denied i * J CITY OF ORONO (612) 473-7357 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 11 H cf.cNO j SEPTIC SYSTEMINSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION FEB 2 [4 199S SSion to period. 1. I 3*3 3 ly ------ ' fcicv* ~I («P) ________________________ J. 4. 5. 6. Business or trade name _ 'LaoBusiness address_____H---------------—■ (city) / f'y <y - *7*5^*^ Residence phoneBusiness phone V 4. o____: ------— Name of app.icam or company r^i^eotanv-efs) bolding MPCA cer.inca.ion _____________c ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type of ccrrir.ca.ion held:X,I'«“>'« - Have you ever held a Sep.ic Sys.em Insraller license in Orono before? Most recent year ----------- /. Have you ever had a license revoked? When. Where? 8.Do you do Municipal jewer hook-ups? Yes rrry -rLift u*i w; wi nV.* •*“ J, I I’fT*"U.- w»“ “ -i I- U i X w*V VW'V ... .. 01 u-v <Uj>K L i'ltiS iL, Z'<•••.■ >tv.=309000 cool 9. Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes ----- SL^MITTALS REQUIRED: 1. $50.00 License application fee. ^v., omnn at oblioee The State Plumbers 17^2. S2.000.00 license and permit bond narmngCity of Orono as oblige . Bond will not be accepted. ^^.^■'51 , /'y^— 3 $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. ^ "4 Copy of current MPCA Certificate. UCE.NSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SteMirTED List persons oriier than applicant who are audiorized by you to apply for permiB^cc your hcense s 2:* £ irsrs and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. ___Da.e_Ji^251--------- I • • ' .• . \/iUf lb CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation: Approval Reason for denial:_____ City Council Action: Date Date license mailed_____ Approved Denied C ity of orono (612) 473-7357 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Business or ti ade name S ?.—CLi —Sf rO/c^ ^ Business address (itreet) fk/cLiy ^tk (w) Business phone ^7.?-Residence phone 4> ^ (up) (*me of applicant or company tcprcsemalive(s) holding ^l^rcA certiftcalion^^ f Type of ccnification held: jv^stallcr j^umper Expiration date; Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year _______ Have you ever had a license revoked? . a J .^ When? Where? 8. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? ^es ., 1<1 9, Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: A .1. »».***( tc u i L t» i \ i i L*i'i» i» iri*},..aac-vvvvv M i'tit Tii u V't vv 1®. i!0i /ii-'l riJ- ,*i. • f*.». t Tl.eS.ateP,umbers Bond will not be accepted.^^- . J-'VJC 3. $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.^yp li 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate. licenses will not be processed until all items are subnutted List persons other tlian applicant who are^authorized^by you to apply for permits under your license PA L , lUy --------------------------------- The undersigned hereby mokes application to the City of Orono. aiid repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic t^, subject to the laws of the Stat and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. ^ ^ ^ Date Applicant’'Signature ......................................... Staff recommendation: ApprovalCITY USE ONLY Denial D»ic_2r22^ Reason for denial: City Council Action: Date Date license mailed_____ Approved Denied CITY OF ORONO (612) 473-7357 2750 Kelley Parkway, P-0. Box 60 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ^ lirtme fee bond, Cenificate of Insurance and evidence of MPCA All questions must be answered. subject to a ten (10) day approval period. Certificatioa must be attached. All appucau^ 1. 2. j. 4. / / U_______________________Business or trade name____i/C I r~ Business address /Q ---------------------- ^ uip) Business phone (strecU - I s~^1 (city) Residence phone _ Name of applicant or company rep^entative(s) holding MPCA certification 5. 6. Type of certiftcation held: JJnsuller JC Pumper Expiration date: Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year ^----------- Have you ever had a license revoked? J>£— WTien? -------------------------- Where? No 8. 9. CITY CF_ ri^niYCE CFFICE 131:500000 I *17 rryVJL cull Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes _)0 — Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes — No SUBMITTALS REQUIRED^ ^ 1. $50.00 License application fee. ritv nf Orono as obli«^ee. The State Plumbers 2. $2,000.00 license and penmtbond nai^ City of Orono as obligee. ------- Bond will not be accepted. /s<r>, )) ) 9CT $50-100-300,000 minimum C^ificate of Insurance. ~ 4 Copy of current MPCA Certificawc. i-Vi».‘Vt vv lFOCK Jk........kEiEIPi-ii':^{^.ruU, t'nni tjtif / t ? :i A/r^ \ ^opy licenses will not be PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMIITED Lis. person^ oUtcr dtan applicant who are audtorized by you to apply for permits underyo^ and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. . t/.U^ ' Date O-'- ^ _f * 1CITY USE ONLY Reason for denial: ______ City Council Action: Date Date license mailed_____ Approved 4 C Page 1COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Mar 1 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK 1995/02/28032640 032641 032642 $5,486.00$5,486.00*1995 00:52:39VENDOR DESCRIPTION_ _ _’’city’COUNT^ CREDIT* UN^ 6 TRANSF 1995/02/28 1995/02/28 1995/02/28 $2,881.72 $9,609.99 $12,491.71* $37,614.22 $37,614.22* 032643 1995/02/28 $1,356.50 $1,356.50* 032644 1995/02/28 $146.50 $146.50* 032645 1995/02/28 $174.50 $174.50* 032646 1995/02/28 $100.00 $100.00* 032647 1995/02/28 $375.00 $375.00* 032648 1995/02/28 $2,916.15 $2,916.15* 032649 1995/02/28 $100.00 $100.00* 032650 1995/02/28 $31.42 $31.42* 032651 1995/02/28 $1,323.46 $1,323.46* 032652 1995/02/28 1995/02/28 $3,750.12 $4,944.12 $8,694.24* 032653 1995/02/28 $30.00 $30.00* first national bank of share fica.medc FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIT,FICA,MEDCR W/H FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL TRANSFER GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DBF COMP W/H HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR THOMTON #C0266780 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR SKREEN #00262310 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- DEF COMP W/H LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR UNION DUES W/H MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE STATE TAX W/H MN state RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP W/H pebsco/obra def comp W/H PEBSCO/US CONF of MAYO DEF COMP W/H PPRA PERA W/H 2/13 - 2/26 PERA CITY SHARE UNITED WAY CHARITY DONATIONS W/ ACCOUNT #INVOICE002473 PO NUM. MANUALOH9999-2032 9999-2030 002483 002483 OH OH 9999-2030 002484 OH 9999-2030 002471 OH 9999-2030 002479 OH 9999-2030 002480 OH 9999-2030 002482 OH 9999-2030 002472 OH 9999-2030 002477 OH 9999-2030 002478 OH 9999-2030 002475 OH 9999-2030 002474 OH 9999-2030 9999-2031 002470 002470 OH OH 9999-2030 002481 OH $70,839.70 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 9 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 02:16:04VENDOR A T fc T Page 1DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAl!MARCH SERVICE 0549-4320 002515 OHMARCH SERVICE 0129-4340 5219749151 OH LONG DISTANCE 0099-4320 002507 OH LONG DISTANCE 0129-4320 002508 OH TESTING HVAC SYSTEM 0099-4343 5029 OH PARTS FOR GUNS 0129-4232 649165 OH FEB SERVICE 0099-4343 164668 OH SEWER SCHOOL REIMB 0569-4356 002493 OH INSURANCE FORMS 0129-4322 48457 OH PAY REQUEST #3 0360-4532 002487 OH PAY REQUEST «3 0357-4532 002487 OH SOFTENER SALT 0549-4234 675402 OH CELL PHONE-TRUCK 0549-4320 002501 OH CELL PHONE-GERHARDSO 0249-4320 002490 OH CELL PHONE-TRUCK 0569-4320 002501 OH SHARPEN CHIPPER BLAD 0249-4342 6072 OH U JOINT *‘■168 0129-4341 5557R OH BRAKES #172 0129-4341 5559 OH HEADLIGHT #169 0129-4341 5597R OH ALTERNATOR #162 0129-4341 5339R OH 3645 LURIC AVE-WTR T 0549-4306 50223277 OH REPAIR CO EXHAUST 0099-4343 18086 OH 032657 1995/03/13 $14.22$14.22* 032658 1995/03/13 $44.05 $44.05* 032659 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $45.37 $30.07 $83.44* 032660 1995/03/13 $520.00 $520.00* 032661 1995/03/13 $228.34 $228.34* 032662 1995/03/13 $168.58 $168.50* 032663 1995/03/13 $43.50 $43.50* 032664 1995/03/13 $70.68 $70.68* 032665 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $61,973.01 $4,750.00 $66,723.01* 032666 1995/03/13 $1,099.90 $1,099.90* 032667 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $25.17 $58.73 $25.17 $109.07* 032668 1995/03/13 $75.00 $75.00* 032669 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $75.86 $173.11 $22.17 $324.84 $595.90* 032670 1995/03/13 $230.00 $230.00* 1995/03/13 $217.20 ATtT INFO SYSTEM AT&T ATfitT BAL TECH INC. BERETTA USA BLACKOWIAK & SONS BRINKHAUS-JACK BUDGET PRINTING CARGILL SALT DIV CELLULARONE CELLULARONE CELLULARONE CHASPRO INC. CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CIRCUIT RESEARCH CORP CITYVIEW PLMBG & HTG COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 9 1995 02:16:04 Page 3CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT it INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL032685$306.08*1995/03/13 $1,566.70 HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM & BOARD-JAN 0080-4358 002839 OH032686$1,566.70* 1995/03/13 $129.13 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU TAX B(X)KS/FICHE 0059-4210 002514 OH032687$129.13* 1995/03/13 $194.21 JIM HATCH SALES CO STROBE LIGHT 0249-4232 4350 OH032688$194.21* 1995/03/13 $4.64 KEAVENYS DRUG MISC SUPPLIES 0129-4232 002488 OH1995/03/13 $20.90 KEAVENYS DRUG MISC SUPPLIES 0099-4232 002488 OH032689$25.54* 1995/03/13 $35.00 KORTH, CALVIN C.REFUND APPLICATION P 9001-3502 002512 OH032690$35.00* 1995/03/13 $13.28 KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE 2/9-3/8 0174-4381 002519 OH1995/03/13 $39.85 KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE 2/9-3/8 0069-4381 002519 OH1995/03/13 $19.92 KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE 2/9-3/8 0569-4381 002519 OH032691$73.05* 1995/03/13 $6.71 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO OIL FILTER 0590-4232 014405 OH032692$6.71* 1995/03/13 $667.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JAN SERVICE 0129-4352 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $476.65 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT PRINTERS 0129-4340 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $1,040.41 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT COMPUTERS 0129-4340 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $563.75 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT PRINTERS 0099-4340 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $142.66 LOGIS - SUITE 300 HOOKUP B & Z COMP 0099-4340 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $3.84 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JAN SERVICE 0099-4353 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $226.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JAN SERVICE 0549-4352 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $526.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JAN SERVICE 0569-4352 AR0195 OH1995/03/13 $2,205.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 JAN SERVICE 0099-4352 AR0195 OH032693$5,851.51* 1995/03/13 $59.00 LONG LAKE FAMILY PRACT HEPATITUS SHOT 0129-4306 002486 OH032694$59.00* 1995/03/13 $411.00 LONG LAKE GLASS WINDSHIELD #710 0249-4341 19396 OH032C95$411.00* 1995/03/13 $301.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS-MARCH 0590-4151 3199077 OH1995/03/13 $1,716.22 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS-MARCH 0129-4151 3199077 OH1995/03/13 $170.74 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS-MARCH 0174-4151 3199077 OH1995/03/13 $1,154.02 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS-MARCH 9999-2030 3199077 OH1995/03/13 $602.00 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS-MARCH 0249-4151 3199077 OH032696$3,943.98* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Mar 9 1995 02:16:04 aPage 5CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL 032707 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $9.42 $169.42 $4,502.23* NSP NSP NSP CHARGES NSP CHARGES 0175-4324 0249-4324 002521 002521 OH OH 032708 1995/03/13 $2,150.12 $2,150.12* NSP STREET LIGHT BILL 0249-4325 002489 OH 032709 1995/03/13 $11.60 $11.60* OLSON, JOHN C.MILEAGE REIMS 0069-4381 002518 OH 032710 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 S24.00 $96.00 $120.00* PER.^ INS PERA INS LIFE INS-APRIL LIFE INS W/H-APRIL 0129-4152 9999-2030 002503 002503 OH OH 032711 1995/03/13 $706.59 $706.59* PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR CLUTCH #431 0249-4341 14795 OH 032712 1995/03/13 $49.95 $49.95* PHYSICIANS' DESK REFER PHYSICIAN'S DESK REF 0129-4240 002499 OH 032713 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $43.68 $22.65 $14.56 $80.89* PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PLANNING COMM. MTG LAND USE APPS APP #2000 0174-4323 0174-4323 0174-4323 190 606 605 OH OH OH 032714 1995/03/13 $69.44 $69.44* PRAIRIE OFFSET RESOLUTION PAPER 0099-4322 104546 OH 032715 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $19.53 $19.53 $22.73 $19.53 $01.32* PRO TIRE (l exhaust PRO TIRE k EXHAUST PRO TIRE k EXHAUST PRO TIRE k EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #167 OIL CHANGE #172 OIL CHANGE #168 OIL CHANGE #169 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 5117 5124 5122 5116 OH OH OH OH 032716 1995/03/13 $8.06 $8.06* RETTINGER BROS OIL CO KEROSENE 0249-4232 002509 OH 032717 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $8.45 $61.57 $70.02* RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 0129-4210 3769155 3768841 OH OH 032718 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $63.79 $2,579.29 $2,643.08* ROLLINS OIL CO ROLLINS OIL CO OIL UNLEADED GAS 0249-4220 9001-1260 96162 40668 OH OH 032719 1995/03/13 1995/03/13 $1,714.50 $126.50 $1,841.00* SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS MARCH SERVICES MARCH FEE 9999-2030 0299-4306 13923 13923 OH OH 1995/03/13 $520.00 SECOND CHANCE BULLETPROOF VESTS 0129-4221 52995 OH COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Mar 9 1995 02:16:08FUND001GENERAL FUND $32,547.84FUND#112 PARK FUND $54.65FUND114IMP/EQUIP 0/L FD $863.12 FUND 423 MUN ST AID CO/PD $66,723.01 FUND #672 WTR OPERATING FD $5,308.75 FUND #673 SWR OPERATING FD $26,165.65 FUND 674 G/C OPERATING FD $686.34 FUND #999 PAYROLL CLEARING $2,964.52 $135,315.88 Page 1 %t information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING OF ...XlLMEEnNG mar 1 3 1995 CITY OF ORONO V 1 X;i; Minnetonka iPowER Squadron A UNIT OF THE If UNITED STATES POWER SQUADRONS AWARDS A CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION 9^0^ Grajfron tone IN RECOGNITION OF AN OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTION TO THIS SQUADRON, AND TO SAFE BOATING THROUGH EDUCATION FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1994 SQUADRON COMMANDER SECRETARY i •V:i Minnetonka i^WER Squadron A UNIT OF THE If UNITED STATES POWER SQUADRONS SAIL and POWER BOATING I March 1995 mar 2 1995 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Orono Asst. Planing & Zoning Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Gaffron: On behalf of the Minnetonka Power Squadron, I would like to express our thanks for helping us with our island permit problem in 1994. As a token on our appreciation, we have enclosed a Certificate of Appreciation which was awarded to you at our recent Change of Watch. Again, thank you for your help. We look forward to our continuing relationship. Sincerely, Robert Stiema Past Commander 1994-1995 f LOCAL TAX RAT COU^^^Y (Suburban) Fund Aevenue 14.912 Social Services 15.165 Bonds & Interest 2.157 Solid Waste Envir. Fund 0.026 Library 3.246 Clinic Network 0.018 Medical Center T.746 Capital Improvements 0.184 Total 1 37.454 FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 MUNICIPALITY Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Chanhassen Corcoran Crystal Dayton Oeephaven Eden Prairie Edina Excelsior Golden Valley Greenfield • ‘ Greertwood Hanover Hassan Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minneapolis Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo Plymouth Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford Rogers St. Anthony St Bonifacius St. Louis Park Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland Tm Raf I c MVR Rat* 23.235 29.532 28.912 23.158 25.834 20.004 26.298 30.789 14.063 24.090 15.577 23.719 25.682 24.921 15.855 19.371 17.579 27.191 34.453 30.801 24.390 25.052 32.453 0.01443 25.608 14.575 See Sef^rate Composite Rate 19.290 19.066 20.547 20.654 22.843 15.604 21.749 15.282 26.626 21.489 0.04636 See Separate Composite Rate ! 24.132 25.769 38.762 18.998 18.471 26.015 15.448 20.173 7.897 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTBICTR Sch Oisfrict 1 Ret# 11 61.402 110 79.852 111 76.280 270 75.076 271 59.300 272 67.235 273 57.975 276 76.139 277 66.441 278 65.723 279 70.142 280 67.327 281 67.197 282 65.790 283 71.212 284 60.414 286 76.861 728 56.511 877 69.296 879 63.221 883 55.805 SO MVR R«fl~ AVT Rat.' 0.12S27 ■.:x- •V -: . • • •< ’-V I' N . 0.05050 0.05316 0.05117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 S-SSiivislsr. , 0.000 0.000 0.000 . ■ SEPARATE COMPOSITE RATES Minneapoiis and Rockford receive Oi^tarity Reduction Aid. Minneapolis does not pay tor the Cotmty Library and County Parks. T*xlno DIrtriet | No WS Rot* City County School District 1 Special Taxing Districts WS No. 3 35.155 33.542 71.803 5.670 • ■ ‘ *.•-. • •• ; • ■ - . ‘ ’ 4. *•* I ^ i . 35.155 33.516 71.768 5.670 2.332 Total Tax Capacity Rate 146.170 148.441 Rockford Taxing Oiatrfet ISity 43.077 County 36.985 ISD No. 883 55.186 Special Taxing District „^^^3j065 Total Tax Capacity Rate 138.313 SD MVR — ISO #863 j 0.05117 ABBREVIATIONS USED WS Watershed SD MVR School District Market Value Referendum CMVR City Market Value Referendum AVT Area Vocational Technical HRA Housing Redevetopment Authority EDA Economic Devetooment Authority SPECIAL TAXING DIS ' RICT RATES • (apply as necessary) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TRANSIT OPERATIONS (ineluded under Metmpolitan Special Taxing Districts on tax statement) StoomrtSJn. Siooklyn 6emet. 4tooklyn l^ark. iiiysta Eden St'A^thonl'"*' Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach. Mound. New Hope. Orono, Richfield. Robbinsd , y. St Louis Park. Spring Park and Wayzata Champlin. Deephaven. Excelsior. Greenwood. Long Lake. Shorewood Chanhassen. Maple Grove. Medicine Lake. Osseo, Plymouth. Tonka Bay and Woodiana T«x Rat* 3.626 3.116 Corcoran. Dayton. Greenfield. Independence. Loretto. Maple Plain. Medina. Minnetrista. Rogers. St. Bonifacius and Hass an________________________________________________________ 2.861 0.334 WATERSHED TAXING DISTRICTS Taxing Oiatrict 11 Tax Rata Watershed No. 1 0.494 Watershed No. 2 0.341 Watershed No. 3 2.332 Watershed No. 4 0.762 Watershed No. 5 0.476 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (Included under Other Special Taxing Districts on tax stmt) ----"..r:------------------- ^ Tax Rat* IMunicipality STORM SEWER TAXING DISTRICTS (Included under Munlclpeilty on tex stetemenU eppllcpdie Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Crystal Mound Plymouth Richfleld St. Anthony rax Rat* 0.579 0.576 0.351 0.564 0.238 0.574 0.573 0.262 Municipality Taxing Dlftrtc\Tax Rata Minnetonka Storm Sewer No. 1 0.122 New Hope Storm Sewer No. 1 0.208 New Hope Storm Sewer No. 2 0.144 Osseo Storm Sewer No. 1 12.354 Shorewood Storm Sewer No. 2 15.353 Minneapolis (Mpis Public Mousingj ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHO nncluded under Other Special Taxing Distrk. RITY :ts on tax stmt) Munleioalitv ' ^ax Rat* Brooklyn Center Champlin New Hope 0.983 0.734 0.426 MISCELLANEOUS METROPOLITAN SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS (inciudad under Metroponran opeuai w Taxing Ditrirt * ^ Metropolitan Mosquito Control (excluding Hamver) __________________________0.347 Metropolitan Council (excluding Hanover)0.442 Metropolitan Council Solid Waste Bonds & Interest (excluding Hanover. Eden Prairie and Medina)0.038 Total ______________::---------------1 0.827 Metro Waste Deficiency Tax (Wayzata Only)1 0.579 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS (included under Other Special Taxing Districts on tax statement)-------- Park Museum_________________________________0373 Henneoin County Regional Railroad Authority 0.001 1.5301Hennepin Parks Total 1.904 Minneapolis Teacher's Retirement Fund (MpIs only) 0.514 TO GET THE TOTAL RATE Add the rate opposite the Mimklpaltty in wNch you reside and the School District in which you live to the County and Special Taxing District rates which apply. Tax Rato County 37.454 Municipaity Richfield 26.626 Sch District 280 67.327 Matro Spacial Taxinfl OistrieU Metro Transit Miscellaneous 3.626 0.827 Othar Spacial Taxing District* Watershed #1 HRA 0.494 0.573 Miscellaneous 1.904 Total Tax Rate per $100 of Tax Capacity 138.831 Prepared by hennepin county taxpayer services division rUi date 05/01/W.0 V ) ) ) ) ) J > : . i KUNIC'.NUMB TOTALS . < I • PROP•TYPEA B C cc OR CT DB DJ F FF X II K LC LR R RF RL RZ Su Y HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM TAX I VALUES BY PROPERTY TYPERECORDCOUNTTOTALMARKET VALUEZ 7 32 47 15 1 4 1 43 10 4 3 47 2 4?7 1r919 4 955 24 117 1 4 198,500 1,030,000 3.829.800 13,188,000 448,100 123,900 517.000 146.000 3.875.700 1.857.700 1.339.700 2.939.800 58,100 9,413,600 341,726,000 599,100 307,022,900 1,866,100 12,671,300 651,900 . 570,000 3,739 704,073,200 10 \ V- L f ^ rVr I f 'I • ■ TOTAL NET TAX CAPACITY6,749. 14,378 176,173 542,073 20,613 5,699 10,881 2,112 42,883 29,422 61,626 130,770 2,673 211,727 5,688,515 8,982 5,478,160 22,064 283,938 29,987 10,720 12,780,145 r o ; . • « REPORT PI435801 PAGE 14NET TAX•8,651.39 18,378.92 226,653.34 700,390.80 26,691.06 7,408.62 13,948.08 2,692.16 54,538.23 37.504.12 79.794.31 169,323.06 .00 3,461.04 268,981.41 7,218,371.17 11.449.31 7,000,477.41 28.283.12 368,074.28 38,827.66 13,741.72 V •• o• ‘I* *.•n-n U>297,641.41 j -f \ yu 0/SmiCTS ) ) ) j ■ .) *• >. f . iMunfcIpiM** Hastan Bloominrfon BtooKtyn Cantar BtooMvn Paik IchampBn 1 Chanhassen Corcoran i Cryrtal 1 Dayton Daaphavwn Edan PraltW Edna Excaldor j Golden Valle y 1 Qteenleld__ Qteenvwod IHanwar IHopfctne i Independence 1 Long lafce iLoretlo I Maple Prove I Mania Plain Medicine Lake [Medina 1994- 1995 Tax Capacity Taxabla (IncremenlVeluBlIonsOul)02/14/95 Report No. S04SS0IA1994-95Peteonal Properly 1994-95 I 1994- 95Real Etiala I Real Estate Agric. I Non-Agric. 68,246 1.701.977 622,500 I.I97.997I 247.585 5,939 1 207,7981 394,305 109,670 61,981 1,641,625 919,1 17 | 44.62S | 626,0421 93.IO0 I ___1 9.403 | ____9,747 268,662 1 121.449 38,575 15,468 1.189.0771 37.747 2.4061 173^1 1,807,722 125.941.37e Total LastTaxTran Capnclty Una 127,643 22.775,239 35.161.516 7.942.075 983.048 3,030,789 11,362,520 23.397,735 36.3S9.513l 6.189.6601 068.967 3,238,587 11,756,825 2.393.236I 2.502.906' 5.647.753 S.729,734 ! 64.460.172 66,101,797 ! B3 .136,702 | 84,055.819 | 2.194.2661 2.236,891 28,563.368 29.209,430 1.016.524I 1.111,(»24| 1 .223.416 1 1,242,81g | ie9J70l 198,917 1S.242.11l l 15.510,773 | 2.332,7851 2.454.2 34 1 2044.2241 2.062,799 336,565 352,033 31.619,361 33.006.436 1,470,404 1 1,508,151 462.251 1 469.657 6.027.3891 ___6,201,36 3 259,457 LestContribution LassIncramanl 4,215.440 7.11ll 5.S2S.OO0I 8,378 3,844 269,9761 641.1631 317.7301 201,0461 111.306 966,4491 Tax Capacity usad for Uniform Rata PlusDIstrlbutiont I NatTaxCapacity 1.616.511 168,485 1.784.996 89.792.201 S.922,B42|95.715.043 18,016,366 3.260,824 21.277,190 26.841.025 7.173.533 34.014,558 1 7.258.519 1 2,199,1761 9.457,695 671,257 671.257 2.917,8571 486.5771 3.404,434 1 9.796,069| 2.905.913 12.701,962 202.531 115.1891 2.165.1881 817.6951 2.702.863 126.7001 116.56ol 5.482.4741 136,562 1 S.621.0S6 9 942.4461 144.e75|56.014,4761 2.597,913 56.612.369 8.042.3161 5.162.7711 70.650.732 2.214.8751 73.065,607 170.297 2.060.594|200,61 7I 2.269.411 3,106,9eot 81,957| 2.892,1931 23.210.257 I.334.793I 24.545,050 1.025.823 II5.4O7I 1,141,230 11.606 1,231,2101 22.614 1,253,624 1 3.8801 195,029 26.966 223,997 1.579.101 93,268' 1 ,021,176 1 12.910,496 1 2.360.9461 1 692.50 b1 14.603.004 169.977 Z5S0.923 352,403 1 45,222 2I9.979I 1.510,417 306.811 161.4761 1.671.693 49,900 356,711 B378| 3.963,536 2.232.946 26.603,576 a.Wgiggl ----30^08^ 209.744 96,9271 ___1 .201,480 241,6531 ------L£<3i!H 19,5314,632 465.0251 464,556 634,594 ! 267.9361 ___6.296,8331 _____I^MO]------ MuntelpalHtet Mlnntlonka 1994-95 Pef tonal Pfopeily 1994-95 Real Estate Agrlc. 1.105,460 Minnetonka Beach 14,536 MInnetflela t^325 Mound t29.360 New Hope 274,402 Ofono 194.020 Oteeo 72.161 Plymouth 1.446.083 nehllald 383.6211 Robblnsdale 227,908 RooVford Rooars 12,204 63,520 St Anthony 92.814 St Bonifarlus 19.266 St Louis Paik Shoro¥vood Spring Park 27,586 Tonka Bay 20J89 Wayzata 110,630 Woodand 11,794 Fori SneWng Int t Airport________ CHy ToUl (Nol to.eeo.569 ehiiinp Mlnnettwlls^ I 26.043,371 66.246 __IncludlnoMlnneapollt) I 26,11t,6l7| 1994- 1995 Tax Capacity Taxable (Increment Valuatfons Out)02/14/95 Report No. S04SSQ1A 1994-95 Real Estate Non-Agrlc. tess Contribution ___1.400,2231 1,414.^591 9,262^7 27,613 4.959.303| 5,099.6281 5.611.0361 5.740,416 64.076 142.123 16.369,4151 16.643.897 2.256.527 12,760,145 _12.974.1651 1,991,257 _ _2.063.4181 319.388 303.955 69.982.562 71,428.665| 20.111.3671 20,495.0081 7.037.9961_ _7,265.9061 220.660 232,864 8.459.244 1,00^546 Less 1 TaxCapeclty Increment j used for 1 UntformRale Plus Net Dlstiibutlons 1 Tax | 1 Capacity 1 ee7.33ol 60.593.255 3.050,662 63.643.9171 1.367.146 t5,9eol 1.403,126| 5.015.552 151.944| 5.187.496 te7,64t 6.4t0,652 009,143 6,319,705 1.294.602 13.090,5W 2.536,9661 15.627.5541 12.654,777 256.791 12.911,56e 130.566 1.620.695 316 373 1.947,268 4.673,782 58.295.639J 3.681.664 62.177,323| i 2.219.234 17.269.226 3.766.930 21,086,156 281.569 1^3.3011 5.761.036 1.671.655 7,432.691 44,219 188.645 110.709 299,434 2.020.531 ^084.051 461.3981 492,672 1,129,961 50.461 1,160.4421 3.719,843 3,612.657 143,377 351.3621 3.317.9181 525,451 3,843.3691 602.719 621,9851 77.1701 544,807 150,543 695,350 44,026.2341 44,913,638 7.099,0101 6.045.4601 j___1,456,722 2.444.0681 1,484,308 4,410,4611 2.929,6431__37.573.b14| 3.611,343 41,184,857 • 22,195|_ _7,838,0411 310,337 _ _8,148.378| 36,5991 169.2921 1,250.4171 194,08?| 1,4K,506| 185,232 2,472.277 50,922 2,421,3551 55.6611 2,477.2361 8.816.1691___8.928,619 1.024.541 736.541 7,167,737 153,1591 7,320.8961 1,697,9481 2.265 1,685,683 6,678 1.694.561 HiS??4,637 6,955 263,146 270,101 730,575,957 10.680.5691 1 784.619.320 27.711 1J75.960 ;rsK f £ s 1 766,495,296 1. 27.711| 10.880.5691 Qi7n7.M4^ 49.34a.60ol 623.S35.033l 57.538.486 10.860.569 259.457 i JlllSU _JS24W 1.7^.906 6«45i,Si4 57,706,971 i 1994- 1995 Tax Capacity Taxabla (tncramani Valuationt Out)02/14/95RaportNo.904SS01A1994-95 1994- 95 1994-95 Total Lata laaa Laaa Tax Capacity Plua NatMunfeipafftiaaParaonalRaal Eitata Baal Eatata Tax Tran Contribution Incramant uaadfor Olalributfona TaxPropartyAgrie.Non-Agrto.Capacity Una Untform Rala Capacity Mtemaapola 0.062,324 309,095,997 317,158,321 33.514.408 40.424.769 243.219.144 40.030.157 284.049.301 1 HtniMpIn County I 1 OtfrtdToW-CMoi 1 1, 1 1 1.049.479.67BI 1 1.063,653,817 1 27.7111 1 125.481.6491 1 89.773.7891 l 868.370.668l 88.537.128 1 866.M7i{6 MunIclpdHIvt * 1994- 1995 Tax Capscity Taxabla (IncramarH Valuationa Out)02/14/95nepoilNo.S04SS01A 1994-95 Parsonal Property _ 1994-95 Beat Estate Agrlc, 1994- 95 Beal Estate Non-Agric. Totrf Tax Capacity Less Tran line Less Conliibutfon Less Tax Capacity Phil Net kicrement used for DItIribuMont Tax UnHorm Rale Capacity 2 299 816 175.934.380 178.234,198 28.083,238 S.688.327 144.474,833 8.833.858 l5l.3oe.29i vyaieraneo rfP. i V|W S W Waieitntd no. z 522 331 28.037,668 28.560,219 4.412,977 596.016 23,551,226 1,602,815 25.154,041 nennepin v^uniy v^anfVi UBHOIB V/VUntf 9Con Vi/ounij 28.560.219 4,412,9H 596.016 23.551,228 i,80l8l5 25.184.^1 lOiai — waieisiiBu rio. c . WolOftntd NO. 3 11 a n fi ^nln 6 348.106 254,918.903 261,267.011 14.355.999 9,099,162 237.811,850 31.732.036 269.843.888 nenneiwi v^uniy 515.189 818,188 V^BnfVf Total - Wotatohod No. 1 • :26i .287.011 . .. •■ .• .V 14.385,999 1 9,099.169! 237.811.8S(» : 32.247421 270.088.071 Watershed No. 4 1 708 026 63,357,919 65,065,945 5,591,562 211,964 59.262,399 3.703.023 62.968.422 nennBpfn v^ouniy S 1 f WW|Wfc w 578.303 878.303 \^arvBi v/ounif Tolai - W«tatih«d No, 4 f'65.065,945 ■ /.S.591.562 . 211,884 59.262.^' olmfa Watarshadkio. 6 7.990 826.634 834.624 1,202 26.380 807.042 148,048 968.607 WotaithodNo.O 23.287.870 526,403,952 549.691,622 27,711 73.056.473 74.143,90o! 402,463,538 84.8te.88l 468.860.089 ToltlWatatihod IHonnopIn County only)34,173.941 1,049.479,676 1,083,653,617 27,711 125.481,449 e9.77i.768 868.370.688 90.837.128 968.967,iiO MunIcIpalHkt School DIttHct No. 270 Hoplilnt EdanPriSfC' Edna QoldanValiay MinnelonEa PlyffKHilh St Louis ParlT Told - SO # 270 School District No. 271 Bloominglon Ecina Total - 8D # 271 Schoot District No. 272 Bloomington Chanhasson Idon Pralria Edna Told - SO # 272 School District 273 Bloomington Edna §t. Louis Park Tolar^SDT273r 1994 - 1995 Tm Capacity Taxablo (Incramant Valuations Oui)02/14/95 RspoitNo. S04SS01A Sianhassen 100 100 DoaphaN^n 01,901 5.647.753 1.330.703 2.194.^ 5,729,734 1,347,670 2,238,891 Eden Prairie 16,007 Ex^ilof 44.625 Greenwood 19.403 1.223.4i5 12.455.702 1,241618 12,719.416Minnetonka246.974 16,740 Orono 11.040 57.701 68,741 Shorewood 143,069 2.0M 7,599,344 2,444.088 1,676.154 34,629,306 Tj44,4ei 2,472,277 1,607.940 58,253,076 Tonka Bay 20,109 Woodand 11,794 Total - SD (T 276 603,962 iB.BOe School District No. 277 Independence 11,169 31,094 153,402 195,745 Minnetrlsta 97,746 143.415 3,910,502 4,1 si ,743 Mound 129,300 l,l73 5.609.063 5.746.416 Orono 44,176 1,569 3.760.324 3,814.063 Shorewood 2.581 290,406 300.907 S^ng Park 27,506i 1,456,722 1,484,308 Total - 9D # 277 412,632 iS.i97.37S1 1 §,687,262 1994 - 95 Pacsonal Property 1994-95 Red Estate Agric. 1994-95 Red Estate Non-Agric. TotdTw Capacity LessTran Une lessContrlbutk>n lassIncrement Tax Capacity used tor Uniform Rate PkisDlstiibulons NetTax Capacity 267,692 4,263 15.003.220 IS.SSS.lB-*' 1 1.574.476 1.021,176 12,759.531 1,664,619 14,424,150 27.906 753 3.140.504 3.169.323 540.372 2.628,951 ll6,23l 62,205 5,i67,445 5.229.650 249.S94 4.960,056 17b,269 5,156,325 202.460 16.053.592 16,336,060 2.057,072 2,561,579 11.777,609 569,950 12.34^59 674,035 38,i 40.916 38.815.745 4,821.087 33.994.656 1,746.359 35,743,0l7 4^40l 4.705.634 4,833,315 1.162.305 1,562.439 2.066,491 54,406 2,142,697 46,403 3.453.003 3.500.366 500,313 2.992.053 150,073 3,142,126 1,409.150 §,216 05,025.276 07,239.642 i0,9l 3,299 $.104,994 >1.221,340 4,481,907 7§i703i4§6 1. ■ -------------- 1.674.349 9,244 123,961,788 125.645.30l 22.415.255 14,050.999 88,371,127'5,010,139 94,289,266 29.^29,260 5,l3l 3,634 20.503 392 20,695 1,6^4,349 9.244 123.091.656 121674,649 22,420,306 14.062.633 Sa;39l,630 b.918,631 94.310.161 23.509 667,070 691,467 200,331 491,136 1,463 492,599 5,939 070 902.070 968.867 317,730 67l,l57 671,157 1,596,752 328.073 59.659.979 61.504,004 9.373,062 144,675 52,066,647 2,300,090 54^45^937 14.440 961,105 oT 9 4 4 f . 975,633 i AX ean 24T.905 101MI26 t44,6>e 733.640 i ^193.758 15a9,5$3 733,648 1 S9,$$2,i4l1,640,7201 320,951 f S 1 I • fc 4.03C1 1,302,4641 1,306.5031 376,565\929.93C1 3.24(11 933,178 772,96()61.214.09]r 61,967.87]}4.495,614\ 1,754.91]r 55,737.34ci i,87l,03(i 57,006,364 7,59( 784,66i }i3,33(i 20,92( } ”55.518.^ ) i 1.513 i—imsn 19,401 P—S8961.8S 1 2,03(1—Wise! ) 21,439 1 66,M$,00T 120.700 28.992 170.297 jj,6O0 771,092 3.030 104.373 50.922 2.265 T351.279 110,560 22,195 100 "5.402.474 1.310.670 2.060,594 ii231,210 11,948.324 65.711 7,W,9l3 2 j 4^;355 1,605.603 33m545 130,562 93.592 200.017 22,OM 793,610 96 299,560 1.513, 6,670 100 5,621,056 1,412.270 2,269.^ 1,253,024 12,742,134 65,609 TJSfVi 2,ilT^ T,«94,S61 ^4 4,051 190,894 16.9M 55,708 4,096,035 124,794 142,123 107.641 5.410,652 909,143 06,323 3.727,740 75.905 859 36.599 109,292 300,128 10.777 1.258,41?1§4,685 326,463 376,933 14,Be$.$6d T,?31.7o4 207,890 1^,929 6.319,755 3.903.645 "^6.909 T452.565 15311875 1994- 1995 Tax Cnpaclty Taxahia (biciamanlValuaMont Out) School DIaIrtcl No. 280 idina Nciiiiald FortSnatllna ______ Toial - 8D # 280 MunIctpalHIaa 1994- 95 Par tonal Property 1994-95 Real Estate Aorlc. School DItIrIcI No. 276 kidapendanca 49,454 114.224 long Lake 30.575 Mapa Main 37,747 600 Madina 110.604 132,160 Mlnnalonka Baach 14.536 Orono 125.061 60.101 Wayzata 2.424 Total - SO # 276 379,42?315.105 School DIflHct No. 279 township of Hassan 3.349 3.296w1IfO•3•163.346 Brooklyn Park 057.556 161.906&>rcoran 23.169 2i.7M Dayton 20.24S 24.151 Mapla Qrova 1.171,756 211.527 Ossao 72.161 ^’lymoulh 173.521 23.642 Total - So If 279 2.405.125 446,490 02/14/95 flapott No. S04SS01A1994-95 Haal Estala Non-Aoilc. _ 907.60? 2,544.224 l.iM.epj 2.964.065 __1.400,223 0.001.663 73.263 16,060.951 1.303 4,259.602 27.193.022 __203.079 216.977 M.m.496 1.991.257 7,105,604 71.045.140 69,404 303,621 453.)0S _15.759.555 20.11?.307 ~11,592 5S,002,534 School Oltiricl No. 201 Brooklyn Canter 213.206 3,763 7.703.390Brooklyn Park 45.607 2,452,630Crystal394.305 11,362.520Qoidan Va^ay 343.574 12,5^,796Naw Hope 274.402 16.369.415Plymoutfi342,393 20.260 15.631,679Robbinsdala227.900 7,037,990 Total - S6# 201 1.041.637 ______21.043 73,007,636 School District No 262 SI. Anthony 92,014 Total - Sb # 262 92.614 3.719.043 3,?j§,043 School OIttHcl No. 203 Edina 4.352Hopkins970154.620 Minnatonka 920 SI Louis Park 633,331 40.559.015 Total - SO # 203 034.301 40.710.907 TotalTaxCapacHy 1.071.367 2.002,799 I. 5M.151 3.^7,15§ J. 4M.759 0J 95.665 ___75.607 TT;553.537 7.940 _4.422.940 20.212.404 _240.036 _26T.373 ^.176.701 _2.O63;410 _7.302.967 74;T76.7S5 J5.029.O39 20,495.000 11.592 15335,639 J.352 155,590 ______920 J 1,392,346 4i;S53,2O0 LaatTian Una less Lass Tax CapKity PlusContributionIncramanIused for UnHorm Rata Distributions _56,306 352,403 209,744 _07,6M 27.613 195.619 12,215 941,609 1,014.901 219,979 l,5i0.4?7 96,927 1.201,400 3,119^00 1.307,146 0,ooo.o4o 63.472 JlSiSoS 16.297.025 00.063 161,476 241.SS3 _99.??6 _15,9e0 1,054 763 TTS 4,625 3,900,651 3.905.276 2.929.643 2.920.643 4,352 150,965 _____920 34,562.052 34710.200 27.009 3,459.240 3.407.3?S NalTax Capacity 1,095,064 1,671,093 1.445ll33 1,403,126 0.163.519 64.Bm 17.600 737 1.296 6.652 165 6.637442.174 3.060,774 1,071,794 4.804.215 8ioS2.S605.561 5.006.662 3.041.646 19,356.175 24.252.3901,392 12.63S 234,610 ^5i.S97 279.in5S.9 o4 529 204.940 27.030 Sr9789,370 3,956.996 2,232,946 25.978.461 3,776.051 20.7t7!3T2303.955 130,566 1,620.095 6,271,632 316,373 ?!m^260617.254 494.061 490.773 0,7^.40515.351 1^97.266 6,699.970 57,604,140 10.626.226 60,292.374 3,049,992 3,404.220 9.374.027 164,990 9,539,0171.006,546 2.2?9.234 17^9.220 3.706.930 21.OS8!?504.637 6.955 263.146 270.1014,061.1T5 5,623,454 irt,65n010 4.216.066 te.066.076 7,920,461 1,755.651 6,164,010 696,130 6.660,9402,490,325 266,161 2,230.1 m 64S.876 2.876.04011.7M,025 906.449 974.307 9,796,069 2,905.913 12,701.96212,673:075 1,049.900 390.614 11,432,646 764.043 1^197,49116,643.097 2,256.527 1.294,602 13.090.560 2,530.906 18,627,$5415,994,532 T.350,952 1,516.011 13,125,569 1,067,356 14.192,9277,265,906 201,569 1,223,301 5,761,036 1,67l,^7,432.09174,953.316 7,959.217 S.355.233 01,600,664 ib.286.0ST 71^.02$ 3.012,657 143,377 351.362 3,317,918 525,451 3,043,3693.0i 2.657 —143,57?' 351.562 5.31jr§18 ------KS.451 ----3.543.385 4,530 T70.054 920 30,021.292 30,205,004 School Dittrict No. 284 Corcoran Mapjo Qrovt Madicina Laka Madina MInnatonka Orono Plvmouii Wavzata TottI- SD#284 Anok«0H~ Bfoofctyn C*nt»r Sfooiwn Patfc Champttn Dayton Anoka Oil Sharbuma728 Towntiiip of Hattan Dayton 1994 - 1995 Tax Capacity Taxable (kicrtmanl Valuations Out)02/14/95 RaportNo. S04SS01A1994-95 Par tonal Property 1994-95 Rail Ettat* Agric. 1994-95 Real Estala Non-Agric. •TotalTax Capacity LastTran Una lastContHbution LataIncramanI Tax Capacity utadfor UnNorm Rata PlutDltb1bu9ont NatTw Capacity 3.565 8,470 142.045 154.080 1,275 152.805 29,423 162,226 17,319 25,543 788.795 631,657 6.540 825,117 124,046 949,16-i 7,406 . 462,251 469,657 4.632 465,025 19.531 484.556 47.303 131.622 2.084.010 2262,93$347,79$sr$^3 r$63,$2r 40,660 183,651 2.523 19,040,967 19,227,161 3,690,478 887,330 14.649.353 506,493 15,157.846 13,009 2.555 ^,132 895.696 34,416 861.280 17,315 878,595 882.688 177.390 42.157.773 43.217,851 5.320.653 1,067.251 M.809,947 2,261,14t 39.071.094 106.206 8.744.926 8.853.132 1,012.326 736.541 7,104,26$152,105 r,2S$,370 i,2W,i4;348,103 74.300.019 75,912,169 10,416,11$2.762.6^62,73) .419 3,152i?40 85.884,159 1 ^~hool District No 286 . urooklyn Cantar 162.679 9,212.794 9,375.473 1.952.878 1.165.933 6.256.662 972,66?7,229,3491 1 Told-80 # 266 1 162.679 9.2i 2,794 9,375,47$1,952.876 1,1U,^5.256.6^972.687 83.187 294.754 247.585 72.115 ^97,s4T 27.332 29.453 120.661 17?,4^6 1.595.670 5.326.618 7,912.622 1,652.134 T8.487.644 1.878.857 5.648.704 8.189.660 1.844.910 T7>^5l 64,737 1.614.120 520.212 2.134.^ 1.530 249.957 144,^1 5.252,686 1.633,442 6,066,1^6 289.978 641,163 7.256.519 2,199,176 9,457,695 131,724 114,660 1,596,5^393,100 ■” i,S5o 73^9o5!9S4 ~n.m»T 4.74$.#i6 barvar 110 MInnatrItta 19,527 48.712 193,605 262.044 17,033 245.011 6,618 2$) ,$29 SUBonlfaclut 19,2^12.663 589.856 621.985 77,178 644,957 lto,543 69S,350 Total - Cwv«r 110 38,793 6),$7$7S3!$5l 684;^B4t5TT — 1 mil 107.161 Carvar 111 ♦ Mlnnatrlsta 22,711 115.020 538,800 676.531 11.237 665.294 20.365 685,659 £2ai Total - Coivor 1))22,7)i 115,020 536,to0 678,^)Ti,237 665;^20.365 6oSi659 Ropars Total - Sharbuma )28 40.457 17.3iO 63,520 12T.207 117.248 27.841 47.620 192,717 1.547.593 1,705.298 249.251 1,456,047 146,922 1,60^,969 351,474 396.625 14.W3 361,722 97,558 479,280 1.972.903 2,084,OSi 461.3M 492.872 1.129,981 60,481 1,180.442 3.871,970 4,185,974 725,5$2 492,672 2,9i7.?S0 mMT Wright 877 4 4 4Wa TownshiD oi Hastan 24.440 42.367 95,915 162.722 6.910 153,812 21,378 175,190 9 ^0 WWW WWW wm w w wmm w Corcoran 107.575 124.640 1,135.693 1,367,916 6.906 57,103 70.927 1,232,900 221,991 1,454,891 Qraanilald 25.703 40.064 51,629 110.276 2.094 9.6l3 106,569 10,851 117,420 Hanovar 9,747 24.370 164.800 196,917 3.888 195,029 28,968 223,997 Total - WriotU 877 167,545 232.249 1.448,037 1,847.831 9.080 79,514 70,92?),688,310 283,188 11971 ,496 1994- 1995 TmCapscHy Taxable (InctamatilValuatloniOul)MunblpaHtltt 1994-95 Personal Proporty 1994- 95 Raal Esiata Aadc. V9ri^i679 Corcoran 12.976 30.092 Qraanlald 442 2.373 indopandanca 56512 212.966 Loratto 18.466 829 Madina 11.504 28.W5 Minnatrlsla 341 3.^5 Total-Wriclhl 879 99,243 277.970 Wright 883 Corcoran 60.493 141.387 Qraanlald 66.875 138,930 Iridapandanca 2.314 3.712Madina4.283 9.839 Rockford 12,204 67 toM - Wr1alil683 148,169 293,935 02/14/95FWp<^rt‘:>i.C04SS01A1994- 95 Fleet Estate Non-Agile 275.601 _7,536 ■883.435 420.266 5.764 T928.338 318.669 _10,351 J.lS.9i3 352.033 460,275 9,310 2,305,551 Ust Tran Una Last Contribution lass Incramant Tax Capacity usad for Uniform Rata Plua Dlstrlbu8oni Nat Tax Capacity 31.233 287.436 40.625 326.06116510.186 499 10.68530.689 1,124.024 55168 iHiSS45.222 306.811 49,900 ------^356111 117.324 171.614 171.337 3.760 179.097 224.931 171.614 9.2! 2 1,909.008 166 185.555 9,378 Z094.314 ^Kool DIslilcl No 000 liitl Wiport 947.206 1.149,086 98.610 40.379 1.010.097777,192 982.997 1.750 72,179 909.06626.183 32.209 1.162 31.047256.922 27l.o44 81.846 44.809 144.389220.893 232.864 44.2l§186,54s2.228.096 2,868,200~ T7S5 298,016 ■ 85188 2.283.245 1Ml42 164,057 _1,165,639 ___ 1,6i 3,12S 2,5391 33.586 , 1.184 ____148,643 116,789 299,434 674,681 2.657.387 " total - So » 000 10.880,569 __^10,880,56? JO.880.569 10,686,569 l<lJZ^7.359.496l 766.4 ey _____________ ,2Ll»I......Si.0<7.O4ll 49 349~OOol 4^.181.544 10.880.569 10,600,569 10,880,569 10,080,58$ dl School Dtatricl No OOl Mnneapollt Total-6D#tol 8.062.324 8.667.324 8.462 6,467 309.6e7635rii7.168.32i ~36§.68763S|~il7:t88171 33,51 4,406 13,614.486 40,424,769 ~46.474.788 naMi.ji u Ilu ~243.2t9.1441 40,830.187 843.116;144| 46!B3in67 784,049,301 '784.14838T JtoglMg5.Bj^ia!Pgl!.«} J__34J73.94 i1 ___3.032.64sj 1.046.447.0311 1.063.653.61 7 27.7111 125.481.449 School DIstilcI No27f Bloomington - Scott Co. total- 3BT27I School DIstilct No 276 Minnetohlia - Carver Co.' Total - SD # 276 ■447*51 447,687 447 862 School District No 282 SL Antony - Ramsay Co. Total - SO # 202 235.929 235.929 (235,9291 445.132 (235.9291 445.132 209.203 209.203 Vocational School 287 Hennepin County____ Carver County Scott County ' TnlST'^^Vocetloriel # 7B7 13.844,845 H.Bil.BlS 1^673,271 1.673,271 706,353.707 721,871,823 15,351 .89,653,807 47,276,883 584,925,702 31,797 (31.797 50,636 (50,636 584,643,8497o5.353.707 “72i;87r.823 15,351 8$,73§,240 47,576^853 Blj12g.545 636,048.327 416,065 [86,836 1994- 1995 Tax Capacify Taxabia (IncramtnIVaKialiontOul)02/14/95RaportNo.S04SS01AMunfclpalltiai1994-95PartonalPiopaity 1994-95 Real EtiataAaric.1994-95 Total Last L*«*Last Tax Capacity Pkit NatRaai Estala Tax Tran Contribution Incramant utadfor DtiMtiuBont TmNon-Agrtc.Capacity Una UnHorm Rala Capacily Mairo TrantH Aiaa VaKiaflona Hasian 68.246 1.B07.722 1.875,968 259,457 1,616,511 168.485 1,764,996 Cordoran 207,798 3,030.789 3,238.587 8.376 201.046 111,306 2.917.857 488,577 3.404,434 Dayton 109.670 . 2,393.238 2,502,908 •202,531 115,189 2.165.168 517,695 2,702,683 Qraanlald 93.100 1.018,524 1.111,624 3,844 81,957 1,025,823 115,407 1,141,230 Indapandanca 121.449 2.332.785 2.454.234 93.288 2.360.946 189,977 2.550.023 Lo ratio 15.468 336,565 352.033 45,222 306.811 49.900 356,711 Mapla Plain 37.747 1.470.404 1,508.151 209,744 96,927 1.201,480 241,653 1,443,133 Madina 173.974 6.027,389 6.201.363 634.594 267.936 5.298.833 145.500 5.444,423 MInnatrlata 140,325 4.959.303 5.099.628 84.076 5.015.552 151,944 5.167.498 RocMord 12.204 220.660 232.664 44,219 188.645 110,789 299.434 Rooart 63.52 2.020.53 2,064,051 481,398 492.672 1.129,98 50.461 1,100.442 St Bonifaciui 19.266 \602.719 621.985 1 77.176 1 544.807 150.543 695.350 Tolol-MoboTiontHAroj 1.062.7871 1 26.220.629l _ 27.283.396l I2.222I 2.394.71ol ------------------------23.792.43^1 ------2.3Z9.SU -----g9J71.1?9| C Total - County Valuat 34.173.941 A 1.049,479.6rel t,0e3.6S3.617l 27.7MI 12S.48<.449l 89.773.769l 868.370.66ei 99.537.1291 966.907.816Ie| Hancvar 9,747 189.170 198,917 3,888 105,029 28.968 223.097 i Tolal- bounty Valiias I " " " f I (NotlncludlnQHancyart I__I 1.049.290.S06i 1.0e3.454.70of 27.711 1 12S.477.56tl 89.773.7691 968.175.6591 96.509.1601 966.683.819.16ol 15.4B9I I2a.06a.85ll 68.689.739 944.3B3.22sl 96.129.1391 Report No. DKPTOlB Hennepin County Payeble 1995 Rates 17-Feb-95 • Fiscal Disparity State Paid Aid Rate Page No. 1 County FD Rate = 134.799 Report No. DKPTOlB Hennepin County Payable 1995 Rates 17-Peb-95 Municipality Name Shorewood Golden Valley Hopkins Minnetonka 36 Minnetrista Market Value Rate • Fiscal Disparity Tax Rate 140.243 138.673 154.026 130.545 144.569 144.569 146.901 136.690 136.690 146.572 148.410 1.^1 309 SchDst. .12527 144.546 138.299 138.671 140.509 138.939 139.734 141.572 140.002 136.645 123.637 125.847 143.250 137.346 139.678 127.507 129.839 ' 124.287 Sch Dst. .05316 33.2762 19.0437 29.096 13.448 80.278 148.448 148.448 29.096 29.096 111.946 Page No. 2 • County FD Rate = 134.79' Report No. DKPTOlB Hcnnepiri County Peyable 1995 Rates 17-Feb-95 Page No. 3 * County FD Rate * 134.79? Report No. DKPTOlB Hennepin County Payable i995 Rates 17-Feb-95 MC Municipality Name 52 I Corcoran 54 Crystal 56 Dayton 59 Deephaven Eden Prairie 63 Excelsior Greenfield 67 Hanover Hassan 123.74^ Sch Dst. .05316 •j 16.328 Sch Dst. .05117 137.870 132.710 141.450 127.819 Sch Dst. .05050 135.835 134.265 143.433 City .01443 City .01443 135.592 City .01443 135.439 City .01443 135.860 City .01443 144.764 City .01443 i 145.491 134.736 128.661 Sch Dst. .05316 12 1.245 Sch Dst .05117 128.025 128.240 114.609 Sch Dst. .05050 Page No. 4 • County FD Rate 134.79; • • • Report No. DKPTOIB Hennepin County Payable 1995 Rates 17-Feb-95 Fiscal M^ket VaFue Disparity Rate 70 Independence 079 19.770 19.770 111.946 aa.2392 178.375 Long Lake Loretto 76 I Maple Grove 284 77 I Maple Plain 79 Medicine Lake 80 Medina 86 I New Hope 88 Qsseo 282 82 Minnetonka Beach 1 883 1 278 ____^ 3 1 05 Mound__________277 __3_ i 1 1 279 _q__ i 90 Rockford 1 883 0__ i 92 Rooer*720 0 94 St Anthony 282 __0_ 128.130 Sch Dst. .05316 138.240 35.7824 23.6 14 35.8635 117.705 a6S128l 120.458 3S.S128 23.775 33.1522! 23.622 .33 1522 23.622 17.1773 34.8727 34.0727 19.770 115.470 117.802 118.277 Sch Dst. .05316 110.861 Sch Dst. .05117 130.932 133.476 134.485 134.421 134.937 147.291 138.313 Sch Dst. .05117 121.162 Sch Dst. .05050 135.632 136.100 34 8727 23.313 34.8727 23.313 34.8727 111 -9^6 .34 87271 178.375 74821 214.167 149.921 28.121 20.121 Page No. 5 County FD Rate * 134.799 Report No. DKPT01B Hennepin County Payable 1995 Rates 17-Feb-95 ^ !■> '-.Ji Disparity Page No. 6 * County FD Rate * 134.799 i »Ii . UU ‘wOullC 4 4 •»-»•««»» • -a M MINNESOTA OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION A Division of the Bureau of Mediation Services HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATION MEETING 3:00 - 5:00 pm Tuetdiiy, March 14, 1995 Orono City Hall AGENDA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Review/approve minutes of January 3, 1993 nicwting. Connection of Highway 12 and County Road 6; presentation and cotnmenls. Location of Watertown Road: presentation and commentr. Connection of Watertown Road and Highway 12: presentation and comments. Impacts of Highway 12 improvements on downtown Long Lake: presentation and comments. 6.Other business. 7. Datc/agenda for next meeting. 8. Adjourn 340 Ceaiennitl Orrict Building • St.Paul.MinaesotaSSlSS PboB*(6 12) 294.203.3 • Pax (612) 297-7200 • TTOMatro 297-5353 • Non-Metro 1-800-627.3529 TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator DATE:March 10. 1995 SUBJECT: Police Department Unhudgeted Capital Items The Crime Prevention Coalition has requested the Police Department provide the Coalition with a list of capital items which are not able to be funded through the city’s budget prwess but which could be funded through other sources. Because the City Council is the approving body for donations to the city the proposed list of capital items is being presented to the Council for authorization for forwarding to the Crime Prevention Coalition, i Date: To: From: Re: March 10, 1995 City Administrator Ron Moorse Lt. Gary Cheswick Crime Prevention Coalition Rec[uest As we discussed, the Crime Prevention Coalition has re<}uested from the Orono Police Department a list of items the department could utilize. The items, listed in priority order, are as follows: 1. Hand Held Recorders - (4) 2. Plain Paper FAX Machine 3. Night Vision Binoculars 4. Rear Radar Antennas (2) 5. Chairs for Squad, Holding and Lobby areas 6. Police Bicycle and Equipment 7. Squad Car Video Camera(s) 8. Monitoring Cauneras for police department and parking lots 9. Bicycle Carrier, tire pump, night light, \miforms 10. Tint Meters (2) 11. Cellular Telephones for Squad Cars (2) 12. Snowmobile Suits 13. Polaroid Camera (1) 14. Report Forms Rack for Squad Room 15. Literature Rack for Police Lobby area 16. Cupboard doors for police front office Upon request, we can provide costs and specifics on each of the edDOve items. TH 12 Corridor Study rr'f CF c;%ONO .USEtiU^iTIl iww " ^ TH 12 Corridor Policy Committee MAR fS 1995 Meeting Notice & Agenda I. Project Schedule Update ► EIS Update ► MIS ► Layouts ► Next Steps II. Next Meetings ♦ TH 12 Task Force March 30’^ 7pm Norseman Cafe COKATO III. Adjournment Meeting Location Orono City Hall WED. March 15,1995 5:30 p.m. Ml morandum TO:Mayor Ed Callahan Orono City Council: J. Diann Goctten Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley Jo Ellen Hurr Administrator Ron Moorse ' mar 10 1995 FROM: Dick Flint DATE: Marchs. 1995 Thouuht vou'd be interested in the attached article, Farmland ’s top yield isn’t residential taxes By Lee Ronning Arcumcnls for saving Icrtilc farmla'nd fron’ being destroyed by urban sprawl often center on the environmental and social impacts ol rampant development patterns But for better or worse, it’s the linancial bottom line that carries real weieht w ith decision-makers As a result, the environmental and siKial havoc w reaked by urban sprawl is often justi fied on grounds that new development increases the tax base, thus improv ing schools and other community services. However, recent rmancial analyses of the costs of sprawling growth are knocking the legs out from under"the economic justifications for uncontrolled develop ment patterns. Simply put. land-gobbling res idential projects often cost commu nities more than they give back in property taxes. That was the conclusion of a studv recently conducted by the Und Stewardship Project and the American Farmland Trust in three metro-area communities Farmington. Lake Elmo and Independence. Entitled. FarmUvuland ihc Ta\ Hdl: The Cost of Coniinniun Services in Three Minnesota Cities. the study traces the How ol rev enues and expenditures generated The Twin Cities area is the third least densely populated metropolitan region in the country, but one of the histest growing geographically. hv >pccific land uses On average, f.irinland adds twice as much to hKal tax bases as it demands back in Ncrvices. according to the studv Using data g.«hered ifoin the Minnesota Depariinent of Revenue. Office of State Auditor and the Minnesota Department of Education, the analysis found that in those three comnuinities. for cverv SI in lax revenue generated by residen tial development, r’ti .iverage SI was spent to prov ide ser vices such as sewers and streets. According to a study conducted in Wright County by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, the fur ther away from exist ing infrastructure development is locat ed. the more costly it is to prov ide services. We conducted the three-community study 111 hopes ot providing the kind ol localized, bottom-line information that has already been well-docu mented in other states. We hope this data will help city officials bet ter evaluate the impact of land use decisions on municipal and schwil district finances The three communities studied were chosen because they represent cities undergoing various stages ol development within 25 miles ol the Minneapolis-Si Paul downtown area. Indcpeiulcnce is growing FORUM to page 9 CityDuSinCSS I cbiu.li> 17. 9FORUM ♦roi'' page 8 while l .ikc I lmt» In expen* i iieine nuulei.iic yi.iwih .iiul I .trmingiiui is Kinc ilevciufKil i.ipiilly IVih.ips ilie most ironie liiuling • •I lliix simly Is lli.u spi.iwlmg roM- ileniial ilcvcUtpiiieiU'* t .in lesuli in Irsy luiuhng lorseh‘Hils In Minncsnla, sialc aul is iisetl in hold »t»u\n pinperiy taxes Hec.iiisc iliis aid is iisiuilly disiiihiilcil h.isecl on |Htpiilaiion tu scluNil eniollineni. ii iiieieascs the share td eJiicatum ’iimliiig alliihiiiahle in ihc resulen- ual seelnr Minncstiia s sehnol aid ix iK peiiileni on ihe loial propeiiy val- u.ilion ol a seht»ol ihsiiu;i. as •aoII as * w ing .1 luiKii;‘ii v*l I lu.dliiu'iii iluis swIUHil disiiiels rceeixe less slaic aid pv i siiideni as growih »H:eurs and pn^periy lax bases exp.nul Noinially. ihe exp.nuled lax hasc would olfsci any loss ol sl.nc aul Hut if rcsideniial dexclopmcnl is ihe souiee of Ihc cxpaiuled develop- inenl. ihcn ihc increased ensi of ser* vieing dial dcvctnpniciil could actu ally lead lo the need for higher prop erty taxes lo fund seluK)ls. the study found. This analysis piunls oul that Minnesota’s lax sirucinrc makes il very dilficuli lo deicrminc u7m is paying ihe true costs of spraw ling residential development and who is henc’ itiing Irom it And II notes that lai inland pioicc- luni may he financially lx*nericial noi City mIo in this Farmington-arr.x sr» nc* Thu suvun-cminly Twin Citius nwtrofiolii.in area lias lost 21S square iiules of agriciiltui al land lo urbani/.iiiun sme<• I 970 i '4 ..I r... 1 f w •IT: Bf- f s. _ "w I I' , ..-Tts-r:V:,.. t I onlv IH.V.U1SC ol Its conirihiiiion to the tax hasc. hut also Ivecaiise it lioKIs dovsn propelt> t.»x vahiatic'in. I ower profvil) tax valu.ition leads to more stale aid. which raluees the share of local government costs paid lt»r hy l(x:al residents and properly owners. The tax revenue as compared lo cost of services ratios this analysts reports arc similar lo those found in eight studies ol farmlan ' Jcvelop- mcni in Conncciieui. Massachusells. New Yiuk aiul Ohio Those siuilies found (hat any app.ircnt gam in (ax revenue from residential develop- mcni vv.is losi when ihe eosi ol ilchvcrmg ncecssaiy public services — from roads, sewers aiut pat king lots to cdiicalK'n ami piihhc salcty — was eoiisiileied A study leleased last yearh) Utah State University’s economics department louiut that for every SI in revenue collected by residential property lax revenue in one of that stale's counties. SI 27 in services was being provided. These siudics come at a time when sprawling growih is desiroy- ing Minnesota s larmlaiul .il an alarming r.iie. The 20 conniy growih corridor lr»>m .St C Uuid tt» the Twin Cities to Rochester is the fastest-griiwing metriqv hl.m area from the northern plains to the east ern sealioard The seven eoiinly Twin Cities meliopoht.in area has lost 2}^ Ncjiiaic miles ol agrieiilltiial land to uihani/aiion since IV70. Since 1980. most of that growth has occurred in sccc'iid-ring suburbs. The Twin Cities area is the third least densely populated metroptditan region in the eountiy. hut one of the fastest growing geographically The ainoiini ol meiio-are.i l.iiul tlevoied lo urhaii land uses has increased hy 42 fveicent since 1970. aliiu»si doii* hie the 22 pcicent |H»pnlatu*n gnus ill I .UC during this same peruM I hese irends arc aeecleraied hy an all tiui common attitude that lai inland is property that is “vacanr or ‘wasted. “ until it sprouts suKlivi* Nioiis Out ag acres liiel a powerlul economic engine in the legion Despite rapid iiihani/aiion in these eounties. metro aiea agrieuiitiial activity piiMlueed more than SStKI inillum wi>iihot laitn output .iiul generaleil 7.000 jobs m 1900 N.itionall). 56 percent of agricultur al piodiiclion comes Irom counties on the cilge of cities. / til nthtnd titul the To\ /?///con- chutes that Minnesota anil metro- area communities should eonliniie to siippoit existing f.irmland protection progiams such as Metropolitan Agiieultural Preserves and Cneen .Acres |-or economic and env iron- mental reasons, the study rceom- inends exploring other techniques to icl.ini this vahi.ihle resource base, siich as pniehase of conseivalion easements. 1 he statistics reported in this study will justify such measures. Pcrh.ips even more importantly, they will help pul to rest the fallacy that the most valuable crop farmland can phulnce is residential laxes. Lee Ronning is f)fogram director of the Land StcwarJihif) Project in Marine On Sl Croix