HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-21-1994 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 21, 1994, 7:00 P.M.
2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAxMBERS
COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Gabriel Jabbour
ATTENDANCE
1.
Applicants presenting proposals before the Commission are asked to move to the
p^ium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the
Chairman.
^1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road - variance - continuation of public
hearing.
2.#1906 George M. Roscoe, 4030 Elm Street - variance - public hearing.
3.#1907 James and Joann Jundt. 1400 Bracketts Point Road - variances - public hearing.
4.#1908 David Carlson, 620 Big Island - conditional use permit/variance - public hearing.
5.#1909 David L. and Margaret H. Vergeyle, 1485 Green Trees Road - variance - public
hearing.
6.#1910 Orono School District #278, 795 Old Crystal Bay Road - conditional use permit -
public hearing.
7.#1911 Ernest Lemmerman, 4620 Tonkaview Lane - variance - public hearing.
Planning Commission Comments
8.Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of March 14, 1994.
9.Other issues for discussion.
Additional Items
10.Planning Commission approval of minutes: January 18, 1994 meeting and February 22,
1994.
11.Plannin g Commission to select a representative to attend the April 11, 1994 meeting of
the Council.
ADJOURNMENT
TO;Orono Planning Commission Members
Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE:March 15, 1994
SUBJECT: #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road - variances
continuation of public hearing
Pertinent Ordinances/Review of Amended Plan
Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) - Average lakeshore setback variance
Allowed = 0
Existing deck = 13’
Proposed kitchen = 6’
Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Review of lot covet age
Total lot area = 19,850 s.f.
Allowed = 2,977.5 s.f. or 15%
Existing = 2,244.8 s.f. or 11.3%
Proposed ■= 2,563.8 s.f. or 12.2%
Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Side yard setback variances
A. Proposed kitchen addition to south side of existing residence
Required = 10’
Existing = 10’
Proposed = 4’
Variances = 6’ or 60%
B.Side deck on north side
Required = 10’
Existing = 7’
Variance = 3 ’ or 30%
Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover review
0-75’ setback area = 5,250 s.f.
None exists and none is proposed
75-250’ setback area = ll,3(X) s.f.
Allowed = 2,825 s.f. or 25%
Existing = 2,182 s.f. or 19.3%
Zoning #1898
March 15. 1994
Page 2
Original proposal » 3,482 s.f. or 30.8% (657 s.f. or 5.8% variance)
Amended proposal = 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% (reduction of original garage at 75 s.f..
removal of drive 69 s.f. and steps at 106 s.f.)
Variance = 408 s.f. or 3.6%
250-500’ setback area = 3,300 s.f.
Allowed = 990 s.f. or 30%
Existing = 1.880 s.f. or 56.9%
Proposed = 990 s.f. or 30%
No variance required
List of Exhibits
A - Amended hardcover proposal
B - Site Plan/Floor Plan Upper Level Garage
C - Minutes of 1/18/94 Planning Commission Meeting
D - 1988 Survey
Description of Request
Applicants have submitted a revised proposal resulting in hardcover reductions from 30.8% to
28.6%. The garage has been reduced by 75 s.f. and the driveway by 69 s.f. The 106 s.f. of
wood steps should be designated by applicants. Staff has enclosed the 1988 survey that
designates a wooden stair/step structure in lakeshore yard. Applicants should specify if this is
the structure to be removed.
Planning Commission members did advise applicants that they have no problem with the setback
variances rquired for deck and proposed breakfast nook area.
Issues for Consideration
1.
2.
Have applicants responded to Planning Commission’s directives set forth in minutes of
meeting (Exhibit C)?
Has the reduction in the garage area met intent of Planning Commission
recommendation? Note lot coverage or structural coverage is proposed at 12.9%.
Hardcover in the 250-500’ setback area has been reduced from 52.6% to 30%. Is the
reduction in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area sufficient.^ —Existing at 19.3%
and proposed at 28.6% (25% allowed). Are there other hardcover improvements that
should 1^ considered for removal?
r
Zoning #1898
March 15, 1994
Page 3
Hardship Staiement
The same hardships set forth in the original review still hold true for the current proposal
Options of Action
Approval as proposed: or
Approval as amended. Any condition of approval must include the condition that all hardcover
improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for new
construction by the Orono Building staff.
r 1
TO;
FROM:
RE:
Planning Commisicm Members
Paul & Roa Hauser
Zoning File # 1898
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
REDUCING SIZE OF PROPOSED ADDITION
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
RANGE AREA HARDCOVER %PROPOSED %CHANGE
0-75 5,250 0 0 0 0
0
75-250 11,300 2,182 19J 3,482 30.8 Up 11.5%
250 - 500 3J00 1736 52.6 990 30.0 Dn22.6%
REVISED PROPOSAL
RANGE
0-75
75-250
250 - 500
AREA
5^50
11.300
3.300
HARDCOVER %
0 0
2,182 19.3
1736 52.6
PROPOSED %
0 0
3233 28.6
990 30.0
CHANGE
0
Up 9.3%
Dn22.6%
Removing 250 sq. ft. as follows:
Wood steps 106
Garage 75
Driveway 69
See Attachment
Ac-
I .akc
Minnetonka
PROPOSED
AUSER RESIDENCE
2801 CASCO PT RD
D«c4i. Witt*
SIS sq ft
^BrcikfiiC
Nook
Caesae 'd^cef^e^
Z‘
320 14 ft
c,<dP^*
(S
^ t m#* jSI 897 for R« H^ril Grccnc «ind
Commissioner «»*''“ of a new survey showing correct'.Silts', sr :r.» S's. -i-. *- - »■ .
.u„ -.UL V.V ROS. mvsa,!». c«sco POO.T KOW. .*«»
. public hearing ^
Mabusih gave the staff repon and noted ““ J^fg^n'^^rnrho^se. “commissiomr
75-250 setback area. Discussion ensu^ in the amount of hardcover
Rowlette commented there was a 5. -o Hauser explained they had
about the possibility of reducing ^.^a above the garage which would be
attach the garaee to the house in order to g needed as the house was so small. He
u" tw^o b'edrooms and a bathrc.-. He noted this would be an
stated they would also gam some much-needed si ga«5fet.c improvement as well as a practical one.
Commissioner Lindquist commented he was Rowlette
woSd be created by the small kitchen « on he s^outh^sid^
b-rnm=“::uv^;yS^^^^
Commissioner Nolan inquired about "^1^ reromiT'Mr°*Nolan responded that
garage and he inquired whether the exis g -u^iroom Discussion ensued regarding the
S would be an'access onto "‘rde“d«°^^ '"^“1',"
possibtlity of reducing the tuea o "a ,^°dft on was too large a strucmre. and wh.le
ff:r ,sr St 5 »
reduced in size.
H .hat the Planning Commission has tried to be very consistent Commissioner Rowlette noted that the P annii^g understood the
receding hardcover levels they were '“>"'"8 ,<,0 great. Discussion ensued
Sh^p me fact remained that the “'"“"wd"n The consemus of the
regarding possible means of reducing .„„m he denied as proposed. The Commissio
'ALiing^Commission r^ qulst to allo^w Lm time to thinh about it
and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point. Ayes 7. nays
tn
u
o
*u
o
c w o
U ‘rl
O u
J rj
U
S*
hO —«
c ^ wi <yo o o>
vj B -»x: «!}
<« O tJ <T| 01 *i ♦J
a V4 (u u V4
'M T) >y c OU-i
u
<9
x:
u
o ou
o(4 u
M
O
W TJ
<U C
•f^ nj
TJ 44
c o
tf) 44 M U
(A o « Iff 01 01
O U r4 SZ U
U W *0 U Ou c o» x:
0> 13 (0 O 01
i 01 NO ^
bO
d
..4
’ < *d w
01 01 U 01
•-1 d .
r-4 U O
«0
V4 O .-4
<0 u
a. tA -
bO 01 M •
c x: oj d
•-* bO u d4 o
d d t4 01
d *0 ,c t»o )4
p :» d 01
MU -r4 X:x: u u u
01 bOd a
d -M H-i m »4
H U O 01V4 0r4Nox;r-4 a,c>
UCr-«CMU U
(0 to vo u
O »-4 Tj
u x: Ti o •-« u
U 01 U CO ro
C M M x:
d
tn
0) 01 .-4
d x3 u
■M u o u
o
d 01 •
0 0) X3 NO 44 o
X) U U CM O 44 *M
y •“« owe
01 to G 01 CO
x: |4 U G 01 01 'M
U U O r4 n u U
Tl ,J r-4 -M X u
44 01 01 r-4 01
o x: d44 s.
U ‘r4
>> 44
0144 01
O TH
01
d
d
w
44
o
to *r4
01 -4
B
f~4
W 01
tO fM
u *o
U G
to to ex
•d
U 01
bO 01
d
H XI
C M
d w
r4 r*
bO >
.M 01
- to XI T3
CM c
0 tO 44 fO
C *M ex o
c "d
01 >r4
U (0
w
to x:
C U
0
•H »d
U c
to to u
d “
01 *d
W 01
01 u
U to
O- u
01 to
Vi >
tn
u bO
C G
•iH ‘H
O T>
a.M
bO ‘M
d 01 d
o x: X3
M r-< U
to bO
X
01
wu
u
u
01
u u
o
U < CO
•d 01 01
C
to O to
x; »J
01 to *d
d *u 01
Ki 01 O X)u M .r4
to 01 Vi
0 »~4 Js 0)
Vi U
M 01 Vi -H
01 U 01
d tn u d H
M to W c
0 to to to W
U UJ u
01 NO ‘M
u JZ 01 C 4
w u x: f-M o u to u u
to 01 o u
d X! u o o to
bO u U ^
•r4 >4 -4 C T1 O C
WO01r-444OG>>U*r4W
OlZrHOlOUtOfM UU
*d r-4i-4 01 V4>swa
01 t0»-4 01 CvO 0I|-4*H tlJ
tox:vif0ddcMuv4XtOUtOVl*r4«f-4r-4W 0101a to iM X to u
VI ex U U) tr iH
to ts 01 O to r-4
>Sr-4 ^ 01 W to
bO Vi *-< V4 fO O
C01M01»d44d0144•Mxroix: ooluo
U u x: U 44 X3 d
GdUViOOlUoiG
01 O Vi O d X3 O
COOS301*H*«U«H
Vi -4 c u
O 41 01 o O •* to
u u 01 x: x: >.-m bo u
COUWr-4WCO
w 01 d u d *M .-4
to x: 01 bo 01 01
ux: cx:x:U O u u
* r-4 V4
u - to bO O
01 bn
01
d
G
01 > •c
01
d 01
d Vi
01 o y CO o > x: B is
o
to
0
V4a
d
01
V4
0
wu
d
01
01 G
u c 01
X -M x:
01 bOU
01
c is w X) *d
4-4 C
►r4 44 »0
o
>o
V4
a
B
>t4, _ . - 01 G >» O
tO i-J T3 U 4l -H r-4 r-4 01
•MW evtiox: o vi
W44W010C01 u*d “01
•HO TJ CM -H U >, c u ti4 x:
0) b0Wr-444t0CO
U^*|J44010)VIO HOI
•HViOXlISQl nOOVi
w
•H
x:u x:
01 u
u
Vi
to W to 01 X >^CM 04 0)
0< O CVi Vi 44 01
O4 01 o u
u u a box:
to to o c u
x: x: H
U u 01 Vi 01
x: D. G
>,*d U CO H
44 c -H
•H (0 c 44
4J 00 >.X r-4 U
Vi •• .-4 U 01 'H r-4
OlvOvOUM U “44rHVi
UC4Clt001OOt0 <j>
.-4,-4r-IX UrJ^O >^U
>' p4 U r>. 4_| y)
XlTJ-d MU440 Vi 01
01 c d 01 o 01 o
Vi to to X is 01
01 u 44 01
X tn m 01 d
C^J C4 4-1 X CO *H
u
o
U r-4 »-4
d Vi
d o 01 u X
u 01 to X O u U
d x: u ^ (0
•H U 01 d B rH
0 CJ 0 44 o exx
a - d to O Vi W
NO 01 44 Tl
01 CM X u 01 01 o
01 d >s-d uu
>s
d
to
D1o
0
Cl
01 u
VI *d 01 D: 01
01 d X X
d to u u u
d Vi 01
H o O 01 O
Mr-4,-4 o UrOiHX: UiS44 U
u
Vioo.u
da
u
o
d
I«•
?V4
01
• -N V4
0 00 ni
tnoo s
1 VO d
I o
: o V4
01
f-4 01
to U
O tfl
tn Q
• •#• •«Vfff >**1't -.—ju|-•.••. "i — - • • .^^‘ «*• ** T *''aiarP£AU LLE.’^T qk:V I -■•KIGMT side £l,gVAT^O^f«Ac« : *•• * • r <'• /'-. . /...,.. •: I.
V-P^OM T ejlevat iom
. '/4’ • r-<?’
I OKOIJO
’■'■tH"
I
! I
M. C*
gLCVATlOt
t
TO:Orono Planning Commission Members
Mayor Callahan and Orono CouiKilmcmbcrs
Ron Moorse. City Administrator
FROM: Jearme A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: March 16, 1994
SUBJECT: #1906 George Roscoe, 4030 Elm Street - Variance - Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.24. Subd. 5(B) - Lot area variance
Required = 43,560 s.f. or 1 acre
Existing = 32,800 s.f. or .75 acres
Variance = 10,700 s.f. or 24.7%
Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover
500-1,000’ setback area = 32,800 s.f.
Allowed = 9,840 s.f. or 30%
Proposed = 5,914 s.f. or 18.03%
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Applicant’s Addendum
C - Plat Map
D - Property Owners List
E - Neighbors’ Acknowledgment Form
F- Hardcover Fact Sheet
G - Survey
H - Elevation
Description of Request
The applicant seeks approval of an area variance to construct a new
resident structure and detached garage were burned within the bst few weeks by the
Fire Department. The fomier residence was constructed 50 to 60 years ago. Fou^iions to
yet to bT removed from the site. A demolition permit was issued.
Mrmit calls for the removal of foundations and debris. Section 12.09, Subds. 1 ato 2 «ntiU^
•Clean Fill" will prohibit the filling over of foundations and debris left on the site. Roa weig
restrictions are in effect now and have delayed removal.
Review Exhibit C, the building site is consistent with other home sites within the Miimetonto
M Park area. To the west of the site is an unimproved dedicated right-of-way shown at
a 30’ width. The City has no plans to develop roadway. The house has been placed on the sit
r
Zoning File #1906
March 16, 1994
Page 2
to meet the required 35’ setback from both Elm Street and the unimproved dedicated right-of-
way. The lot meets the required lot width of 140 ’ to the rear of the 33’ front setback line. All
setbacks of the LR-IB Zoning District have been met.
The former residence was connected to municipal sewer in 1979. There is no municipal water
available to this area and properties are served with on-site wells. It is not clear from the
information that has been submitted whether an existing well will serve this property. If an
original well has been abandoned, it must be properly sealed. Applicant should advise.
Drainage will follow the namral contours except that drainage will be channeled along driveway
so that runoff from development site will not drain to the east propeny.
The following conditions of approval should be included with your recommendation:
1.
2.
3.
Applicant to provide grading detail on driveway that will insure drainage
continues to flow to south or Elm Street and away from residential property to
the east.
Depending upon status of the existing well, if former well is not to be used, the
well must be legally abandoned by a qualified contractor.
Applicant must tulfill requirements of demolition permit and complete removal
of foundation and other debris on-site as soon as weight restriction on roadways
are lifted.
It is staffs intention to present this application before the Council at their March 28th meeting
r
/ 7 0(c
CITY OF OROKO - VARIANCE APPLICATION f
Initial Application Fee S200.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee S1(X).(X) / /
(no change from onginal application)
Variance for non-coniorming structures $200.(X)
After-thc-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
-1
•'1
.'■•A
rrrv rz nr--.\;n
wa I I W4
L V a' > A/r r "‘iTr* T * kf CM I acc
a •.‘w'V'ii. V'vv w
PROPERTY ESTORNUTION
Site Address ^ C ^0 “ST/g-t g /
w a > V
Ti
.ViwW W
W V t vv
Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) 06 il7 erJ- V/ CQ'J^I \ ^ I. c a I I r I
vr,n
ift\I WW
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired De, C. / 9 S
"rfZ I V w' V' w i V' a i>-kf T< a»‘ , V' a n a r a u * k.
(month/year)
a /Ca*^/
1 (4») (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: ^ residential ___other (specify)
Zoning District: ^fZ'l(b_________________________
Phone (homeVA O'} ‘1\D-Oe>L9f
_________ Phone(wOTk/4/^) 9v4- 3^J3
Address: inc.<^l <,^a~rAx)A g^l ti City: ttok/A Zip: 55-^*/^.
APPLICANT
Name . Ro Srz>£
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name _______
Phonethome)
Phone (work)
Address:Citv:Zip:
DESCRIPTION OF REQLTST
Describe request in detail:
-An -/-/b
EstimatedConsmictionCostS^SO^ OC'd
Sf" ^ree. \rc r ^(ytsJC f ~frri 6. .*7d a.c.t'P ) n't"
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage
Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual oroMtp' conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ,T^a c* l\ -e-Jr --------------------
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
MM
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS■H M ■ ■ ■! ^ ^ -» k ^ —
. „ „ infnm.,.l«.. m.s, H .vt>nut.<d ja ,h> wMca.i9a d,adjia^.3 ldaigito
jw vmir application to be con$iOergd_caniBiglgI
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
of owners wiOun ISO’ ,yon nsus. ob.in ^is Us. fron.
SeSi^pin Dep>nn«nt of Finance A-603, Gov, Center, o48-32a>.
PI,. Map (Obu.^ r"^"^Kra“ucemed surveyor) and include hardcover.4 ,„.«•. n-,«
f»“< ■“ ‘“‘5~
' K-i2.fr
you wish notified of this application.
Additional items as may be requested by City stall.
APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE renuired or requesttd by the Zoning
The applicant hereby agrees ‘o P^vide ^ll o f„ payment)
Administrator, agrees to pay addmonal ^aati^^ and certifies that the
and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of tosapp^atm^
information supplied is true and correct to die best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant’s Signamre
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner’s Signature ^ ----------------------- f
Applicant must have all submittals into the City Monday of^each month.
M^eSting. Planning Commission Meetmgs ^^
Applicants must be present at all scheduled meeting please make arrangements
and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a sch eiiSding & Zoning Office of
“have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the BuUdmg
this change prior to the meeting.
a Date n In
“ / 7
8
1
»0A J ^
L » IT 8 T1
, / (96)
f i' **• VMM UTt otmm UTCN til Nt»i€PXN. i-• »•S8 M-117-XS 41 0054' ma^ um m«m momss imassigntbOMCM MM NOtC4IN rOMFClTCO tANO TiMAVft NCNNiAIN FORFdTEO LAND ; . HMC/AOM rot SALE TO ADJACENT*r'.✓ iT - •A: *•
\ MOP UM
iMCP mm
TAXPAYift
NAm/AOM
PPOP MM
OMCt MM
-V . ' TANtAVEt
NAHE/AOOR
‘ t •
*•
I. ;
. PROP kwn
V ' oMNtii mm
' TAXPAYCR •
NANE/AOm
* >jr» •
rS:'Y">’»•
. <•
' PROP ADM
o»t€R mm
TA)9AYER
HAHE/AOM
r.-V-
MOtCRTY OMCRS ONLYSD DD-nr-ES 41 OOTt
04DS0 CLH ST
ADM VETERANS ArEAIRS
6C0R6E N tOSCOE
10441 SHETANA RD §500
NINNETONU MN 5S345
SD 04-117-2S 41 0002
OOOSD ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
KAREN niLLER
KAREN rUUER
1477 LONG LAKE RD
NEN DRI6NT0N NN 55112
SO 04-117-2S 41 0091
00401 HIM«T0MIA H6LD LA
C CURTIS LEE A NXFE
C CURTIS LEE
401 raNNETONU FiGHLAND LANE
LONG LAKE NN 5SS54
SO 04-117>2S 41 OIOS
04005 OAK ST
TAD ARGADRIGHT
TINOTHY A DARSARA ARGADRIGHT
4005 OAK ST
LONG LAKE NN 55354
1
t ■t
V \
•v/,. :v i
' 'y7‘
«'* ^.*V" , • •
/» V*'.*- V .f *
»A . ^ , • • • ! ,,
COUNTY RROREITY IWORHATION SYSTEH RRORERTY OMCRS LIST50 04-117-2S 41 005904001 OAR ST M HAMUROERC A 0 HAmUDERG 0 MA»«URBERG A N NAttURDERG 4001 OAK ST LONG LAKE Ml S55S4SO 04-117-23 41
00415 HIMCTOMCA N6L0 LA
L N NILE A N J LEE
LANCE N HUE A HARTNA J LEE
415 HTKA HIGHLAND LANE
LONG LAKE Ml 55554
SO 04-117-25 41 0003
00050 AOORCSS UNASSIGNEO
KAREN FULLER
KAREN FULLER
1477 LONG LAKE RO
NEN ORIGHTON MN 55112
SO 04-117-25 41 0094
04075 OAR ST
KERRI L OEAUCHAMR
KERRI L OEAUCHAMR
4075 OAK ST
LONG LAKE MN . 55554
50 04-117-25 44 0005
00449 MIMC TONKA HGLO LA
JAMES P HEMIIN6ER ETAL
JAMES P HCNNIN6ER
449 MIMCTONKA HGLNDS
LONG LAKE MN 55554
REPORT NQ. P14S5401 PA« S9 ,\ ■50 04-117-25 41 004004100 ELM ST LUCY L OULLICKSON LUCY GLA.LICKSCN 4100 ELM ST LONG LAKE m 5555450i 04-117-25 41 OOtl
00050 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO
KAREN FULLER
KAREN FULLER
1477 LONG LAKE RO
NEN ORIGHTON MN 55112
50 04-117-25 41 OOM
00594 PARR LA
HERMAN LAUE A MIFE
HERMAN UUE
594 PARK LANE
LONG LAKE MN 55354
30 04-117-25 41 0098
00525 TOMKANA RO .
A 0 A V A HOLM
ARNE O A VIRGINIA A NOLH
540 DEBORAH OR
MAPLE PLAIN Ml 55559
TOTAL BATCH
c.
%
\
[e =^/r‘1, •
f •—H
9
I* ■ 'iL' ■ *
• V- •/
9 ,
.
4 • *
*4 '
Dll OQOIA
• I 1* »<*•
4
‘ k - » . * ' ' * A*
•. Vv» w.‘.- .'V
• . • .*•. *'.* . V- ...........
. •. f* ^ vtv - ‘ • ■». v;
• * •* < ' '**'^<**
■ k* *.
.7 #•.V ^ *1 • ^
•j • ^ I • #-• # 9k. ^
'r ,/■ V*-
r . •
r /
V
f ; !
T • v' • •7 • * . . •
f
• •
*
r ; •■
■ *•>;
» ' \
f *
• ^
• >
. c . ^
4%. *T '• t:*
•Sf' • . *
• # . V
I
»f»f
’ •
.«* :t
* •
r •; .’
* •
*1
r«.- ■>.
p-./*-i'*V' '■
^ .
" ' A •
.. - • •• ^
. »‘.‘ ...• * . * • _ 1 r
r >.*•
» • ■
■ V. ■;
•;
*.
%
•>
•*.’ ^
' ♦
nmmPVi county ^fwfimr immurioN systth■HTY OM€t$ LIST PtPmr NO» ^X^5S4Q1 PAOI 40
\
V •• . V»
•V. ..
• • * ♦
1 V - y
* • »
; I" • •. • •
•N ‘
0 ”^
i.
-
X CERTirY THAT THE FACTS RtPRESENTCO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
representation of inforhation as it appears this date on the records
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TA>UTION, TO THE BEST
OF NY KNOHLEOCE AND BELIEF. /
I f
• .n ■
DATE -M /M \.
• ,
< •
4v*
J
I (we))/
n J " '
Adjacent Property Owners^ Acknowledgement Form
of 5^5 T^AJ/OsoJA
'^Sfnnt rumc(s)j (pnm address)
have reviewed the plans for ihe proposed improvcmeni or proposed use of the property located
at Afo^^o <.'rtdr-^r'^iSO referred to as Land Use Application N’o. /90^
I (w<-> undersund that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the Ciiy
Council that I (we) am (arct aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s
project or use requires Council approval.
2,'/2
Date
/4^,
Properly Owner Date
!«••«# ««•*****««
I (WC) v U-
(print name(s))
of 03-^ SiVv-cg3r~
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at HOSO ^ *=^vrc-4"“ also referred to as Land Use Application No. (^Q(g----•
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to conlum for the Ci^
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s
project or use requires Council approva'.
^perty Owner Date T
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 ys prior
to the scheduled meeting date.
r _
r
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK 2CNE: (CIRCLE cne ) 0-75* 75*250
Existing Hardcover in Zone
250-5Q0'r 5C0-10C0'
A. House ' i f ■ze 3^0 S.F.
LENGTH
ze
WIDTH
^ S.F.
. S.F.
. >& ^ ^ ^^ S.F.
. X S.F.
B. Garage r >4/— x-------------—
c. Driveway JJ^-------x f /
___ S.F,
^ S.F.
7 61^S.F.
D. Sidewalk /r 7C S.F.
S.F.
I L'/ 0 c
E. Patio / Deck
S.F.
/i//S.F
F.Landscape
AREAS
UNDERLAIN
BY
PLASTIC
SHEETING
X 3 7^ S.F.
X
X
S.F.
S.F.
S.F
G. Other
Total Hardcover in Zone
S.F
S.F
Total Property Area in Zone S.F
£
I
>T^/4 X 100 - li_£2.%
Vb
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
ROBERT CRAIG HOMES
OF iOTS 9 THRU 13. BLOCK 8. MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
LEGAL CRIPTION Of- PkEMlbES SURVEYED:
Lots 9, ',11.12. and 13. Block 0. MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK,
o: denotes irofi marker
denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum.
All bearings are based upon an assumed datum.
This survey intends to show the boundaries or the above
describe!' property, and the proposed location of a
proposed house thereon. It does not purport to show any
other mu rovements or encroachments.
jr O
gAit%fMr 3 ,VBcV 3 (i?>
CP p-jUjrAy m ? if, S •
I
• t
?r
Coins & Gro\berg, Inc
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under mv direct super
vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer anu Land Surveyor under
the laws of the State of Minnesota
Mark S CronberR Minnesota License* Number 12TO
DAIt /-2f-94
SCALL r'-30'
JOB NO 94* 10
• i e Ml\^
I
i •
»
t' %■pV • I I. •V. %* • • ♦ .‘i*t • ;> .■f:i.:-.i■• \s'V;•-.• i
• •
. I
LEFrELEVAflOl
Orono Planning Commission Members
W
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorsc, Cit>’ Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
March 16. 1994
#1907 James and Joann Jundt. 1400 Bracken's Point Road - Variances - Public
Hearing
IPertinent Ordiaances
3.
Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - No structures allowed within 75 ’ of shoreline.
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover.
0-75’ setback area = 130,380 s.f.
Allowed hardcover = 0
Existing hardcover = 21,312 s.f. or 16.35% (approved with variance
#1867-245.5 s.f., review Exhibits E and 0
Proposed = 21,312 s.f. or 16.35% (adjusted for approved deck/stairs-
21,557.5 s.f. or 16.5%)
Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (F) - Stairways, lifts and landings allowed within
the lakeshore setback zone. Structure not to exceed 4’ in width. Landings not
to exceed 32 s.f. in area. Canopies or roof not allowed on access structures.
List of Exhibits
1
Application
Plat Map
Property Owners List
Hardcover Inventory
Site Plan Application #1867
Plans/Elevations #1867
Current Survey/Site Plan
Description of Request
Applicant proposes the renovation of the stone step accessways located on the east
shoreline of the property. The existing stone steps shall be reinstalled within the lakeshore
bank. The area of the access stair will not be increased. A new railing will be installed.
Please review Exhibit E, note that there are two stone accessways to be repaired. The original
one to the north has been removed. The new access staircase to proposed lakeside deck is not
shown on this site plan. The issue, as with the first review, was that the code is not clear as
to how many access stairs are allowed on a lakeshore lot The code does not specify each
Zoning File #1907
March 16, 1994
Page 2
propeny limUe. to one
sundards of Section 10.56, ( )^TV 0.75- s^iback ,n:a and
tone, staff deiennined d.„ was a need fot
the variance review.
,. ■ ,. Am’4- The earlier variance review for access stairs to
souU. J'a^^e'^r sto ^ ‘^'^ntest .n6etn one 6as l«n tentoved.
OptuMis of Action
Approval.
OR
Approval as amended.
Any condition of approval must include the foUowmg;
1. Applicant must obtain a building permit for the renovation of the stone step
Structures.
2. Appropriate erosion control should be maintained during the period of time
groundcover remains in a disturbed state.
3. Restoration of groundcover in the areas occupied by former stone step access
Structure.
/
' i
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
rr
■-V
Initial Application Fee S2CO 00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal VariarKe Fee $100.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $2(X).00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site T4Q0 Bracketts Point Road. OronQ» MN
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 11-i i
arr Of uhoso
Flt^HCt CFFIi.
A W W
.Af rry
TL
V h^V *
%V} •*
55391
htCEiPT-inm )0u
S^9i490 COOl POl T
,1*VA*.* A.4-
rrupciiv iuciiuiiv4AiAv/i. V- — —jL-i—1.1 i ——
Aitach legal description to application if not included on required sursey.
Date Property Acquired .March 1992 ------------------------------------
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: X residential -----other (specify)--------------
Zoning District:^__________________________———------------------
(month/year)
ADDf irAvx nmmpt 612-786-7711 (Of f ice)
Mami» Kraus-Anderson Construction____ PhoneiNWyK) 612-473-5732 (Site)
-Company"; Hidwetit UlVisidn Citv: Circle Pines Zip: 55014__
AddresSg^^j^ Rendova GLieeL ME------
Phonahome) 6l2~471-0299
Phone (work)____
Way 7af,a_______
OWNER (if different than applicant)
James and Joann Jundt_ _ _ _
Address: 2200 Huntington Point Rd.City:
description OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $—4,000.01
Describe request indetail: Repair existing stone steps to_la jce^-----
55391
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area _Lot Width
^ Setback:Front Side
Hardcover
Rear
Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
hardship /description of unusual property CONOmONS
(uttuch additional sheets if necessary)
TICE
'ynA r
• V
20Q. i
YOU
t ROl T
02/2:
f ice)
te)
# i
/y _i.
'•‘T-
REQUIRED SUBMITTAI^
^11 of .K. followfno infor.n.linn must bt ;')bniilttd.biJ!!C_ai!pii»-:»i9n »latej!l_arjLcr
fnr yniir aopHcation to be considered complete:
Sled Pro^m orJiTist of owners within 150’ (yw must obtain this list from
— Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center, 348-3-71).
3 * Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). , • , hnrrtrnvf*r
1 — Certincate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor and tnclude hardcove
■ “ calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/4 .4 II fo
5 * T^p'^mphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any conges in existing grade
' - In addition, provide one (1) copy SW’ x IP for tepr^uc ion.
h X SketcheVor plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) cop> 8 /a x 1 )•
7 — Ust of the legal names (include mariul stams) of all persons with an ,meres m the
■ — nroDertv This would include name(s) of applicaiii(s) if not current ownerts).
8. As LiTddendum to this application, please attach a separate Itst of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
Q Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
ofHESE ITE.MS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY SUB.MITTED TO THE CITY OF ORONO.
The Anolicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that jli _
v,.i....re unnlicntion is not complete if the alwve information.has not been mcludgt h
information supplied is inie^d correef to the best of his/her knowledge.
DateApplicant’s Signature _
m'^lTrtee'^by Sledges and agrees to this application and lunher
rnrcy lnm die property by C^y staff, consultants, agents Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
DateOwner’s Signanire____________—------------------------
Applicant must have all submitmis into the City offices 25 days Wore « C"
M^eLng. Planning Commission Meetings a^^^^ ^^etingfonhfpCing Commission
Applicanis must be present at »>' scheduled meeting, please make arrangements
^-rry^r^a^^nd m advise the Building ^ Zomng Omce of
tliis change prior to the n ting.
«1
/'"#5T «V■ 4 ..—r
*
4 __>:> t //1 »«90C •• m'*?5 /
(h •jwm>m,
• • •
lUN MTl■ATCN 004Aom OHNEK name TAXI>AVEII NAHE/AOOR S0 11-117-25 52 0004 01400 0H4CKETTS OOlMT RO J R JUNOT I HARt J JW»T JM«S R JUNOT OOK 1CRYSTAL RAY W S5521 MCW«R1H county RROMRTY 1N»0R«ATICH SYSTEM PIKIRERTV O0«RS LIST58 11-117-25 52 0010012A5 ORACACTTS POINT RO MICMAEL I LYNM 111 I Win MICH4CL A JWIJA LYttl 111 126S 8RRC7.ETTS POINT HAVZATA mm 55541 REPORT MO. PI455401 PACE 12^8 11-117-25 52 001101420 8RACAETTS POINT RO J R JUNOT A H J JUNOT JM1ES R JLWOT BOX 1CRYSTAL BAY MM 5S525PROP AODROWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 50 11-117-25 52 001701500 ORACKETTS POINT RO CEOROE S PILLSOURY ET AL GEORGE S PILLSOURY 4000 TIRST OANR PLACE MPLS N4 55402 58 11-117-25 32 001801223 BRACKETTS P01T»T RO ELLA P CROSOY ELLA P CROSOY 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RO HAYZATA »84 55541 38 11-117-25 52 001401280 ORACKETTS POINT ROJOHN S PlllSBURY JR ET ALJCRA S PILISBURY JR ^J| _ABOO FIRST BANK PLACEMPLS TtT 55402
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAHE/AOOR
SO 11-117-25 55 0001
01420 BRACKETTS POINT RO
J R JUNOT A H J JWOT
JAMES R JUNOT
BOX 1
CRYSTAL BAY MM 5552S
50 11-117-25 55 0004
01450 BRACKETTS POINT RO
MARTHA S A A LACHlAN REED
MARTHA S A A LACHtAN REED
1500 BRACKETTS POINT RO
HAYZATA FW 55541
56 11-117-25 55 0005
01480 BRACKETTS POINT RO
R A L HEADRICK
ROGER L A LYNN C HEADRICK
l<.aO BRACKETTS POINT RO
HAYZATA MN 55541
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
50 11-117-25 55 0004
01500 ORACKETTS POINT RO
MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REED
MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REED
1500 ORACKETTS POINT RO
HAYZATA ;t« 55541
TOTAL BATCH 004 GQOIQ
OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANO BELIEF.
DATE
2..L '1
hardcover CALCULA'nON WORKSHEET
M. - • »
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) f 0-75’
FYTVTTSr. HARDCOVER LN ZONE
A. House Boat_________ .
75-250’25-500’
J
500-1000’
196 S-F.
Leoftli WiM
%
X
%
B. Garage
C. Driveway
C Public)
D. Sidewalk
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Stone Stsps
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Other
a
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
20,591 S.F.
S.F.
195 S.F.
280 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE *
A 21.312 * B X30.38A- ^
pHr>Pn.SFP HAtirK-nVER LN ZONE - SAME AS ABOVE
A. House______________* ----
21,312 S.F
130,384 S.F
16.35 "i
Length Width
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Paiio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Other
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ^ B X 100
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
■ %
\)
A
B
A
B
I
41
' < V
/
h 1 ^
’ ' i ('' >; I;/
./
\
f
-/Jlii \
i
)
¥■
V#
■') ■ ‘
/
I
/ \
\ *' '
1
[*•//'m
ij
( t \ ' VV i^yl /*/ h* \
/ ' ■ ■■ ti hi-I ['ll) \l
m-i ■ M ■ ijp>
bf''/^^^
ti
"ifi‘/'^.
V /
V.If
V
ir
» fi.«
I '.
\I
"V
rv * 'X
.zl H55S| j
1^5 n
S >-1 O 5
|sE§
= 511
, S i £ cd “. 2P S
') }
/
p;if?km
i
/
/
i 4^.
.3? ■
•• t
c .I,
//.
/
\
//t /'/
t
A//f /
/)
/
A/Sf / 'i
'■/ @»
\'k.
s
>< ^
‘^1
AO.Nk I IONS ■' V
•n*^
-r:^
- 't-V
9
SI
#
}liSiii
iiililll Jilirti
A
.•il
TO:Orono Planning Commission Members
Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Aaministrator
DATE: March 16, 1994
SUBJECT: #1908 David R. Carlson. 620 Big Island - Conditional Use PerTnit/Varianee
Public Hearing
. I
.r
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.31, Subd. 8 - Required setbacks for accessory structure
A. Lakeshore setback
Required = 75 ’
Proposed = 95’
B. Minin'um from side or rear internal lot lines
Required = 30’
Proposed = 37’ and 32
c Shed shall be 30’ + from septic tanks and lO’ tom septic system easement
Required setback from tank to shed is 10
Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Hardcover within 75-250 ’ setback area
75-7.50 ’ setback area = 11,880 s.f.
Allowed = 2,970 s.f. or 25%
Existing = 1,926 s.f. or 16.2%
Proposed = 2,142 s.t. or 18%
flood elevation.
section 10.53. Subd. 8 - No filling, grading, temporary or pemtanen. structures will be allowed
within the floodplain.
C ■ toss Subd 10 ■ Permitted and conditional use permit - Section lists stocmres allows
wUhin flood fringe areas via No use
of any flood flow.
Zoning File #1908
March 16, 1994
Page 2
Section 10.22, Subd. KB) - Average lakeshore setback variance.
Allowed = 0
Existing ~ 90’
Proposed = 20’
List ot Exhibits
A - Application
B - Property Owners List
C - Plat Map
D - Hardcover Inventory
E - Rear and Side Elevations
F - Front Elevations/Floor Plan
G - Site Plan/Preliminary Subdivision Locating Drainfield Area
H - Survey of Property
I - Resolution #3264
Description of Request
Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl8’ storage shed to be placed on a cement slab^
Structure will )e completely located within flood fringe district requiring variance and
conditional use permit. Principal structure was approved at a 90’ encroachment of an average
lakeshore setback. The proposed accessory structure will be located 20 in front of the average
lakeshore setback. The same hardships noted for the approval of the seasonal cabin can be made
for the proposed storage, review Exhibit I. The higher elevations to the north minimize any
visual impact by the approximate 12’ high struemre.
The applicant has commenced the filing of the petmit review pr«ess with the Watersht^
District In an earlier conversation with Ellen Sones of the Watershed District, she ^vtsed that
as the stmeture is an accessory struemte and if it is placed at grade on a cement slab with no
ftitther encroachment of the flood fringe elevations, the structure would be approved as
proposed.
Review Exhibit G preliminary site plan of the earlier subdivision review locating septic system.
w»W^ approxLtely 40’ from septic tanks. The code would require a 20’
setback. The structure meets all other setback standards except for the average lakeshore
setback.
Zoning File #1908
March 16, 1994
Page 3
lilies for Consideration
I on s.™cmre be located on lot on,^^ flo^ '^0:^ e"'u';t ‘S
- 30. and would ptobabl,
encroach into the septic system easement.
*• ssKiasaT-S'SaHSS
Options of Action
Approval as proposed or amended;
Any condition of approval must .nCu^-^^= o^r'm Ss“
as slab so as no. » encm«h any Ambers may wish .0
SV",2C'rSS ~ «*
4'% ■ I
I A
CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAM) USE APPLICATION ,
'X'f
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address ^2c — X Z" S'/*i.
c. u PType of Application to be Filed
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)
APPLICANT
Name Ocu.*n^
!Zs.
Address 9c4r<r /f»^C/cu et'' Z2-_
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name ______________
Phone (home) 5"________
______ Phone (wKxk) 9J*/- / V
Citv tf/i*___________ Zip
-/36^
Phone (home)
Phone (work)
Address Citv _ Zip.
Date PropejiyAcau ired____
I (do) (3SSt> also own the adjacent parcels of land
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS -
>v$ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application
>^$125.00 Residential Accessory Use
$200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$175.00 Guest House/Guesi Apartment'
$150.00 Duple.x Credit/Bldg
$250.00 CommerciaVIndustrial Use
$200.00 Land Alteration
Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain
Grading and tilling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore
PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule
$100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application)
....After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 V.ication
$175.00 Easement Vacation
$ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule)
$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
$100.00 Appeals
_____Other - see Fee Schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District ______________
Present Use of Property Residential X Other (specify)
(month/year)
rrrv nz uZtr^rs
rr^/.Aiurr nLcrrcI I aLu
1350200000 S
-Ii rv\l fT“ .v»
rucri(
tl^rryoTZi'UMik' vn/i
Wfc. / # w*v?V i\\fA
’^00%vO
'■nilmas
* /nr- /£?.-/•n
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
Completed Application Form.
Describe request in detail.
Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you can obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271).
4. Plat Map.
5 ____ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey
infonnation.
g Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
7’ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve
changes in elevation (grades).
8 List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the
property. TlSs would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
9 Construction plan, if applicable (see statf for requirements).
jQ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY
FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS
SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be
submitted.)
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete.
Initials of Clerical Staff:___________________________— ---------------------------------------
APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE
The applicant hcrebv agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or unusual expenses incuired in review of this application, and certifies that the inlormation
supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant ’s signamre Date 2
OWhfiER’S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable
entjy onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council
mernbers for purposes' of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner’s signature ^_ Date 2^-22-
Applicam must have aU submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Ptag
CoLiission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at tdl scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled oiwtmg.
please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Buildmg & Zoning Office
of this change prior to the meeting.
o MJN MTC l«/20/«2eATCM QQSpwof toonOllIFft tEUK TAM'tYtRlutc/AoimPROP ADOR
OIIKR NATC
TAKPAVCR
|MI1C/*eOR
PROP MNM
OltSR lUtC
TAXPAYER
• NAK/AOOR
PROP ADDR
a ICR HAIR!
TAXPAYER
NAIC/ADOR
M E2-117:E5 ER 0001 00720 010 ISIANDTRISTtN O ERICKSON ET AL YRISTIN O ERICKSON 2A30 MARStRANO ROAR IIAYZATA Itt Bssnft f2-117-n 20 000«OOOSS ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
SttCRYL RANSTAD IWASS
SltERYL RAHSTAO NVASS
12120 OOlOCN ACRE DR
miltETOIKA III 55SAS
OEtlCPin COtITY PROPERTY IHEORTUTION SYSItH PROPERTY OllJERS LISTSO 22-117-21 2A 000«» OOAOO DIO ISIAHO M ORYSON A T RRVSUI H1U.1AM I niElHA BRYSON lots KIMOERIEY iA PlYinUIH Ml S5^^7SO 22-117-21 51 0002 00540 BtC ISLAIO
DON IIEIVERSail ET At
DON MFIRiERSON
SOAR lOnUtnALE CT
ins MTI 5SA14
SO 22-117-25 SI 0010
004SO 016 ISLAIA
DOUGLAS E PERSON ET AL MA. E
JEFTREY A PERSON
17S45 OTII AVE N
PLYMOUTH IM 55447
SO 22-117-2S SI OOlS
00410 BIG ISLAin
CHARIES LEROY PECEIOH
CHARLES L PECEIOH
12215 45TH AVE N
MPLS If! 55442
SO 22-117-2S 11 0011
004S0 016 ISLAND
00U6LAS E PERSON ET AL M/I
JEFFREY A PERSON
17545 YTM AVE N
PLYMOUTH Ml 55<^47
SO 22-117-21 SI 0014
00410 DIG ISlArn
CHARLES L PECEIOH
CHARLES L PECEIOH.
12215 45TH AVE N
PLYinUTl! MN 55442
REPORT NO. P14S5401 PACE 14SO 22-117-2S 24 OOOf 00470 BIG ISLAND H E DRYSOM I T L BRYSON HUIIAM a TIIEIMA BRYSON 5014 KIMIYCRLY LA PLVIGUTU IM 55447SO 22-117-21 51 0009 B04S0 DIG ISLAND
DOUGLAS E PERSON IT AL H/l G
JETTREY A PERSON
17545 4TH AVE II
PLYtOUTH Ml 55447
S8 22-117-25 51 0012
00410 BIG ISLAIO
CHARICS LEROY PECELQN
CHARLES L PEGEIOH
12215-45TH AVE NO
iriS Ml 55442
SB 22-117-25 51 OOlS
00410 BIG ISLAIO
CHARIES L PFCELON
CHARLES L PECEIOH
12215 45TII AVE N
PLYMOUTH Ml 55442
• •
PROP ADDR
OHIIER NAIIE
TAXPAYER
NAfS/AOOR
58 22-117-25 51 0014
00400 BIG ISLAIO
GAO ADAMS
GEORGE • OQIMA A0M1S
10512 TOLEDO AVE
BLOOMIIOTOII MN 554S7
SB 22-117-25 51 0020
005Y0 DIG ISLAIIO
J 0 FIEGER a J M FIECER
JAMES FIECER
5111 HOLIDAY RO
lilMIETOiaCA Ml 55545
3« 22-117-25 51 0025
00420 DIG ISLAND
PAUL HIE VAIIDCRHOOF
DAVID R I JAN H CARLSON
2240 OHIGHT LA
HllflETOtKA Ml 55345
• I
PROP ADDR
OltICR NAME
TAXPAYER •
NAIC/ADOR
58 22-117-25 51 0024
00440 BIG ISLAIIO
ELIZABETH rOSlER SALISOLTIY
BETTY F PRIir.E
C/O CHEN S MYERS
9T05 DRUmOOD CIR
SUN CITY AZ B5551
SB 22-117-25 51 0027
00450 DIG ISLAIIO
JAMES A R JOIIIISOII
JAMES A R JOIItiSOII
2000 DENTON BLVD
MPLS Ml 55414
50 22-117-25 51 0026
00450 BIG ISLAIIO
JAMES A R JOICOII
JAMES A R JOIRISOII
P 0 DOX 15245
H»L5 Ml 55415
mtl DATC 10/20/f2 PIN COUNTY MOPfUTY lllfCmUTlOII SYSTlH HtOPWTT Oli«RS LIST WLrmi ND. PI%3S^01 PLGf \fIIATCM OOSmOP AD09 OliCII NAf« lAXPAYCII UAHE/ADOi la f^-n7-^s 31 ao7Y D0S70 DIG ISLAND JOOIC t VARGAS €T ALjootc acaa vakasASa lATN AVf N GOOOtNG ID asnoi 58 77-117-25 51 0050OOAAO DIG lSlAt» CIIMIOM Ari»SONcinnoii RfUDsm 1873 rpAtaiiH Avr s cNPLS m SSh IA 38 77-117-73 31 MilOOS80 BIG ISIAHO J D A J H IIIGER JAf€S 0 rUGEII Sill HOLIDAY M mmEToiRA rti sssasm08 AD08 OltCi IIAIK TA)CPAY€II MAI€/ADOR TOTAL BATCH 005 00071
h .
t CERTIFY THftT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESCIITATION OF IfirOTOUTlON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HEIAIEPIH COUIUV DtPARUIENT/OF PROI'ER^V IA^ATION» TO^lftE DEST
OF HY RIIOHLEDCE AND DELIEF.
OAT
/T"r-b\^ C'-oT I =5S
HARECOVER CALCULATION KQRKSHEHT
/*CK ZONE: (circle cne ) 0-/5' (^-250V 250-500' 500-1000,D
//.STING H ardcover in zone
/
0
0 9
//
..ri • • ./
/
i^7
A. H ouse
LENGTH width
X 3.4._
\
3. Oarage
c. D riveway
D.. Sidewalk
Sc oeeTM*!^o
v^’cec'^ -------
e. Patio / D eck
\ 'Z
- iz
F. Landscape
AREAS
UNDERLAIN
BY , .
PLASTIC
SHEETING
G. Other
7
Co-^ X
IZ. X A 4
SL
Total H ardcover in Zone
Total Property A rea in Zone
\^ZL SI— -T*B H&So
f t>4^
I L-Pn
4-5Z
f
S.P.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
I ^ 2- (e S.F
\ I 8P?D S.F.B
X 100 » U.*2-\
0/ • To •
,<LLie
r
• C Vv c (P i *2-1 ^ ^
„ttO .-^70 sc
, • *. , 7 •-*- ... y , . .^ , .-----------i* .
EieVATlOM
'^l£>E ttCY^fow
•»o),/
I* t&
■■*■**■
...* *1 ? •k. ' * •.-V .*r *' •
rP^NT tUevATI^N
ri-AN
• •
cn
00
•p
#
o
I
m
\
I o' 0^
7
CITY of ORONO
BESOu-noN OF THE cmf cou>caQ O A A
NO. O ^ ^ -------------
\Ib-MCIPAL^Ni™OWr^^ONs'^^ «.
1(B) AND 10.31 SUBDIVISION 11(A) AND
A cowma^Srekvm pek secton .o.ss. subdivision lo
files #1781/1782
,\
uw^RFAS David R Carlson (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the
property .oca.cdTo^^; S wiUun 0,c Cicy of Orono (hcrcuuftcr -City-) aod .ogaUy
described as follows;
Loi 1. Block 1, Island PoiiUc, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter -the property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to
toe construction^ seasonal dweUing that will be located 90 ’ in front of the
allowed.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVBD by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
This application was reviewed under Zoning Files #1781/1782.
variances per Resolution #1998 at the time of the creation of the RS Distric,.
Page 1 of 6
r««Mn »«on
CITY of ORONO
resolution of the cmr council
^ C!NO. ' - —------------
3.
4.
5.
r'rtmmicsion revie^Td this application on November 16,
The Orono ^ proposed vatunces as set forth above
based on the foUowing findmgs;r;5r^.“rrx-r.,s-sr;“ir=r,
the average lakcshcre setback
A.
B.
C.
D.
TT.0 seasonal dwelltng wUI be located 7J' from Ore lalteshore and will
meet the 30’ interior lot line setback.
earjn hf. tiervcd bv ^ aporoved on-site septic system to be
iSaterS^e tht 931.5 or floid plain elevation of Uk= Minnetonka.
Proposed hardcover for comprehenswe Sw'75-':?^Miback
result in 16.21% hardcover where -5 .0 is a*iowea m
area.
“St; x”=.T2
designed to allow water to flow freely beneath it.
The Citv Council finds that the condiuons existing on 'Jj*! P™^^ (fi«rict; that
do not apply generally to od«r property m to o^g d«mc
granting the variance would riot adversely after foatficco^u.om^^^^
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Cit>.
The City CouncU finds that granting a '^7 “' ““ ‘"aifoT JJe
constniction of a seasonal dwelling on Big Is and *7" ^eLal welfare of the
Minnetonka will not be detrimental to the health, safety or gener
Page 2 of 6
tmm ^
CITY of ORONO
RE50LLTION OF THi: Cm' COUNCIL
O r-NO.
. -iv lisht air no pose a fire hazard or other danger
pubUc. would not adversely a ^ ^^ ’ Surrounding property values and
u> neighboring prerenjes nor dep^cu ^ ^
s riiTci. - ~ 0, *. c„
CONCLVSIOSS. ORDER CONDITIONS
s .7;r.s.i “uS'."2
conditions:
1.The seasonal cabin shall be IhnUed .0 2-^dr^_nvs
“vsTem^tt d^X^dTdroom use. Bod. propenies shall be
lusted to 2-bedroom seasonal dweUmgs.
2.
Upon application for a budding permit, applicant must provide the following:
Foundation design by either a certified architect or engineer.
Permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
a.
c.
Topographic detail confirming elevation of first habital fioor at a
minimum 932.5 elevation.
d.
Drainage plan to include erosion controls. Such measures must be in
place during the construction.
3.
All building construction shall be subject to all pertinent sundards set forth in
Section 10.31. Subd. 11 of the RS District.
4.
W L ivy il • ^ ▼ — — -
Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the own
Page 3 of 6
t^rnym
\i
o
mJ
CITY of ORONO
REiOLlTIOM OF THE CfTY COlTVCa
NO <> g '^ -1
5.
6.
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (April 12, 1994).
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution <hall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1993.
V./^v/ 'y' .3
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor/^
Property Owner(s)
Page 4 of 6
TO;OroiK) Planning Commission Members
MavoT Callahan and Orono CouiKilmembers
Ron Moorsc, Citv Administrator
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE March 17. 1994
SUBJECT: #1909 David and Margaret Vergeyle, 1485 Green Trees Road - Variance
Public Hearing
Pertioent Ordinances
Section 10.56, Definition 2 Bluff - Topographic feamre such as a hill, cliff or embankment
having the fo.iowing characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18% over a
distance of 50 ’ or more shall not be considered part of the bluff):
A. Pan or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area;
The slope rises at least 25’ above the ordinary high water level of the
water body;
The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25’ or more
above the ordinary high water level averages 30% or greater; and
The slope must drain toward the w?ter bixly.
B
C.
D.
"Toe of the bluff" means the lower point of a 50 ’ segment with an average slope
exceeding 18%. "Top of the bluff" means the higher point of a 50 ’ segment with an
average slope exceeding 18%.
Defrnion 3 Bluff Impact Zone - A bluff and land located within 20’ from the top of a
bluff.
Definition 26 Steep Slope - Lands having average slopes of 18% or greater as measured
over horizontal distances of 50 ’ or more, that are not bluffs.
Section 10.56, Subd. 7, Classification of public waters - Recreational Development Lakes (RD)
Tanager Lake 929.4
Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C-1) - Setbacks from shoreline required for struemres =» 100’
Two additional structure setbacks;
Setback from top of bluff for structures = 30 ’
Bluff impact zone structures and accessory facilities except stairways,
landings and lock boxes must not be placed within bluff impact zone.
Section 10.56, Subd. 16(G) - Steep slopes. Any applicant requesting a permit for construction
of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other improvements on steep
slopes, shall provide adequate information to allow the City to evaluate possible soil erosion
r
Zoning Fiic #1909
March 17, 1994
Page 2
tmnacts and development of vi5ihility fri>m public waters before such permit may be issued.
XTdet^ined rLessary. conditions shall be attached to issued ^nnits to prevent en^sion
^preserve existing vegeution screening of structures vehicles arid otter facilities as vieued
from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf on vegetation.
C^^inni0 56 Subd 16<I-2) - Vegetation alterations. Intensive vegeution clearing wi^in 75 ’
I no r>f Khmhs and trees less than 6" in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of trees
. view ,o <hc water frt>n. the pri^tpal dwelltag s,«
accommodate the placement of permitted suirways and landings, picmc ^as. access path
beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided Uiat the screening o
!^tur«. vehicles or otter facilities as viewed from the water, assum.ns summer, leaf on
conditions, is not substantially reduced.
Section 10 % Subd 16(J-5g) • Topographic alterations/grading and filling. Plans to place fill
^cx""v "ei mater^l on s.4> »'op« "-.ust reviewed by d« City Engineer for conunued slope
sUbilitv and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater.
impact zone.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners List
D - Hardship Sutement
E - Mabusth Letter 1/8/93 ,
F - Applicants Request for Scheduling before Council at 3Z..8/94 Meeting
G - Neighbors Acknowledgment Form
H - Shoell, Mattson Report
I - Ceil Strauss Letter 2/18/94
J - Ceil Strauss Letter 2/18/94
K - DNR Proposed .Amendment ot Code
L - Survey
M - Grading Plan
N - Boulder Wall Section
O - Gusufson Report
P - Filling Profile within Bluff Impact Zone
Ql-2 - Section/Profile Bluff Zone
R - Section/ Locating PercenUges of Slopes
S - Landscape Plan
Zoning File #1909
March 17, 1994
Pace 3
T - Floor Plaas
U - Building Section
V - Elevation
Review oT Request
Lot 1. Block 1. Green Trees on Tanager Lake was platted in September of 1980 ami was
approved at 1.69 acres. The property is not sewered, requiring an on-site septic system. All
other lots within the Green Trees plat have been developed. The last remaining lot is the mint
severely limited of the lots within the subdivision with steep topography and a roadway that
surrourals the majority of the building envelope. The recent Shoreland Regulations not only
created new protective regulations for bluff areas but also reclassified Tanager Lake as a
Recreational Development Lake requiring 100* setbacks for all struemre. Much of tte shoreland
of the property is occupied by a wetlami. The builder has advised staff that applicants propose
no alterations of the shoreland area and wish to maintain it in its pristine condition. Applicants
wUl seek to remove dead trees ami trim and prune existing trees. Any trees prop«ised for
removal will be evaluated by the Building staff to determine the type and number of trees to be
removed. Staff will seek replanting schedule and determine if level of tree removal would be
classified as clear cutting which is not allowed under the ordinances, refer to Section 10.56,
Subd. 16 (1-2) noted abtive.
Applicants have managed to locate a house, septic system and generous driveway layout within
the building envelope all meeting the 25% hardcover allowance. Applicants have been only
recently notified of the presence of bluff areas on the property requiring more restrictive setback
from the top of lakeside bank. There is little room within the building envelope to relocate
proposed house. Mike Gaffron has prepared various exhibits to depict the bluff impact zone as
defined within the current ordinance, proposed land alterations within the bluff area and the
impact of fill on the downside/lakesidc of the bluff, review Exhibits P, Q and R.
Because of the limited building envelope, any other attempt to relocate home would require a
street setback as well as a bluff setback. Any readjustment would have to be to the northwest
cul-de-sac area as the septic prevents movement to south and east. The structure would still not
meet required 30’ setback from top of bluff. Staff will have a sketch of the building pad and
a footprint of the house to assist in determining whether house can be reliKated to a more
acceptable location.
In reviewing the exhibits on the slope determinations, note that a 9’ rise in a 50 ’ segment results
in a 18% slope. As the house is currently proposed, it will encroach within both the bluff
inipact zone and 30’ required setback. Filling is proposed not only around the house pad but
to the lakeside of house, refer to Exhibit P.
No doubt our current code is restrictive and as we interpret and implement the code, we find
Zoning File #1909
March 17. 1994
Pace 4
bluff would be ai approxunaiely jeHned loc is 27^1. Start will
at U.e 950 elevation, the average pe^e^ge of slope trom me
accept the 950 elevation as the top of the slope.
issiia for Consideration
1. Review Exhibit P. The house.^ The foundation
!;r*Aras tetlTw^ Rather tL a patio bet«ath deck, what about a lower dech
bei^ insulled and allow grades to remain as is.
, Review Exhtbits M, N andO, P>“ “
bluff impact zone requited „ Gustafson cannot approve as boulder wallspropose boulder walls. Review Exhibit O. Gu t^^^^^^ ^
Lnnot be ceitined by an engineer. ' f npe of fill, and type of
Gustafson asked for specilic information r'^^^^^hat “ must Ik separated
tie back restraints to be used. His reps j j „ „„ further filling within the bluff
at least 4 ’. What is Planning ^0"’™“^ ^ ooJ^of lakeside of the bluff? Is
.t,»»i.... .< ~
application.
concerning the type of wall to be installed.
^ structure is to be located on bluff '"aLP>»
of landscaping/screenmg will \x require Guilder has advised that no
not address the lakeshore a code will allow access paths, picnic
changes are proposed in lower ™ be given to the removal ot
areas within the bluff impact zone. Special attention m
plantings on bluff.
Staff was pleased to see the proposed ^ oTs^letbKk
Staff secs no problem with this as long ^ considered. In any event, this
area. If outlet velocity is of "P staff and the City Engineer. As far
is a matter that can be reviewed in ^^ ^^v potential erosion of the steep
as staff is concerned, it makes good sense to minimize any p
3.
5.
Zoning File #1909
March 17, 1994
Page 5
bank. Docs Planning Commission have any additional comments concerning this matter?
We hooc we can come to a final recommendation concerning this variance application. If
members seek additional information to assist in their determinations, please advisc^tt pnor
to the meeting. It is staffs intention to sctedule this variance application belorc the Council
meeting on March 28th.
Options of Action
1 Approval as proposed requiring the approval of variances foMhc
win be located within the bluff impact zone and within the required 30 ^tback.
Application also involves the additional filling within the bluff imp^t zone.
cSLnission should then recommend on type of retaining walls to be installed and type
of planting to minimize visual impact from lake level, or
2. Approval as amended. Amended approval may concern the following:
Possible street setback variance for relocated house.a.
b.
c.
Setback variance from top of bluff.
Depending upon the degree of filling needed with an amended proiwsal. filling
may end at the foundation at lakeside of structure and a recommendation to instaU
grade level deck as opposed to a grade level patio.
^ '
cm' OF ORONO - V/VRUNCE APPLICATION
JLLInitial Application Fee S200.00
(S50.00 per each additional variance) j
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 •
(no change from original application)
VariaiKC for non-conforming structures $200.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY LNFOIL\UTION .
Site Address I *'€6^ t<L
\
/
:> lie nuui i / u ^ i r > ---------------------------TyrTil
Propem' Identification Number (P.l.D.) //- ----vv IJ.
rrrv r*4T
firr^rc
i Jwv^ wvvv
ti wtf* *.vv«w
i-i
ktuIPT-lHiSS YOU
n^y I I I V' wv'w'A »»v a i v' ' •
*u*.aakaa*wr«vw * -------------- -----------/----------------------4-i------* — ------------:-------—-------------------
Attach legal description to apolicaticn if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired | «^ 3 I ^ 3_(month'year)
rTOgertv —,--------------r t - ■--------------------
I (do n^^ also own the adjacent paiccls of land. . if/
PreseniusT^property: residential V other (specify) ^
Zoning District: L R - 1 ^
APPI irAVT i\ Phone (home) ~ 5 ? 7
Name P>r;v., A U Vi"iMl^Pt>one(work).2Jf^^g^------
Address: 'ry.aai ^ Ciiy-aJLa^sJ:^^----Zip:(L>
O'VNER (if different than applicant)
Name ________________
Phonc(home)
Phone (work)_
Address;City;Zip:
_ ^ pcrirn^at^HrommictionCostS b , CC>0
Describe request in detail; ^
M ^ Or .me 6piev^.^-f4ven b hg-y-f ----------------------------------
description OF REQUEST
fay ><• LK c.t-4varn b hg-y-y r»sel-------
' (attach additional sheets if necessary)
V ARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area _
Setback:
___Lot Width
Front __Side
Hardcoyer
Rear
Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
)( Other (specify) ^fi?LV<llc —(^UAff LdifU------------------------
hardship /description of unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS
^n" u!^fu7hardship or practical diff.culry or uousoal property cond.uom prevent.ng
compliance w ith Zoning C^e requirements.----^----------------- -
. ti-)VcvC\N*-cl)_______________________________________£s
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
required submittals
jill of th€ followine information must be submitted byJheapplicaUoO
y„|. ^ppiiratinn to be considfrf4 complete:
1.
•y
3.
4.
Y of owners within 150' (you must obtain *is list from
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) py
5.
6.
7.
To^mpWe survey (existing «td proposed ekvations)_if any changes in existing grade
XtcXfplam “'(iTtStoTvlilsTp^vi^ on"(l)°cow's'/x ID.
“L, ,i„.i,„t, marital stams. of all persons with an mterest tn
8.
9.
/ <;Wefrhes or Dlans of floor & elevation views (proviuc one vn •' ** /
YS onhriecarnles (include tr.arital stams. of all persons with an mtetes tn the
^ nroperty. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any o er pe
you wish notified of this application. ^ ^ V
\ddtuonal items as may be requested by Ctty stalf. ^ .(() ■ J- —‘f
■;;foL«VdTs';^ and corr^ to tta best o^lnsther ^owk^e
DateApplicant’s Signature
memb^rf^p^'r^rJo/inve^tion^and
^ /70^ /T Date x^'
Owner ’s Signature
and Council. If an applicant is una Building &. Zoning Office ot
to have an authorized agent attend in your place -ua lo
this ch nge prior to the meeting.
8
J
ovnor A
t OiTt
»637 o;
l*Vr.9
I G^EEM TREES OM
TAMACER LAKE GOVT LOT 2
iGALLY RECORDED MAP. IT
/PILATION OF INFORMATION
,TY rnilMTY AMD <;tatc
0*Tf 02/22/^ MTCM 002Pn» ADOR COMER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOORMt(» ADOR OMCR NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AOOR
OROP AOOR
COMER HAHE
TAXPAYER
HAME/AOOR
50 H-117-25 25 000201A75 SHORELINE OR ROOERT P SCHHITT I NIFE ROOERT P SCHMITT 1*75 SHORELINE DR OMNO FM 5534150 11-1X7-2$ 25 0012 01A45 CR'.EN TREES RO
J A NALKER I S S HALKER
JAMES A A SHARON S NALKER
1A95 6REEN TREES RO
HAYZATA MN S5$41
50 11-117-25 25 OOU
OlAOO GREEN TREES RO
CAS PLATOU
CARL A SUSAN PLATOU
1400 GREEN TREES RO
NAYZATA FM 55541
HEFMEPIN COLMTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OIMERS LIST50 11-117-25 25 001001407 SHORELINE OR ERIC H OERIFFGAUSE ERIC H BERINGAUSE 1407 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA FM 5554150 11-117-25 25 001401520 GREEN TREES RO
0 0 RYERSE JR A M L RYERSE
OORAFCE D RYERSE
1520 GREENTREES RO
HAYZATA MN 55591
50 11-117-25 25 0017
00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
CAS PLATOU
J 0 SURBER
4152 NO YUCCA RO
paradise valley AZ 05255
V.
PROP AOOR
^ 0NI4ER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADOR
t ,
4»»*i ' '
TOTAL BATCH 002 00009
t *
* ■ A
vv.-'
•-•V- •
. - mm ■ ( I':- • V, .
V V» *•*
/I—' '
* *
• ' % *
* .4v'.
;•>
r I. '
V» ■-. '
REPORT FIO. PI455401 PAGE 450 11-117-25 25 001101405 GREEN TREES RO STREETER A ASSOCIATES INC STREETER A ASSOCIATES INC 10300 MIFMETOFACA OLVO 0200 HAYZATA MN 55391 %50 11-117-25 25 001501510 GREEN TREES RO
0 B A J L RICKARD
DAVID B A JIAFE L RICKARD
1510 GREEN TREES RO
HAYZATA MN 55591
50 11-117-25 25 0010
00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
GREEN TREES HOFCOFMERS ASSOC
GREEN TREES H0F1E0FMERS ASSOC
C/0 JACK 0 YOST
1515 GREEN TREES RO
HAYZATA MN 55341
k,
1
f J
i J
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL
PROPERTY CONDITIONS
MARGARET AND DAVID VERGE\XE, .APPLICANTS AND OWNi'ERS
1485 GREEN TREES RD., ORONO
Summary: After accounting for setbacks from street and lakeshore,
the remaining buildable area falls within the bluff impact zone. In
effect, if a setback to the bluff impact zone was also accounted tor,
there would be no room to accommodate a dwelling. Without a
variance to the bluff impact zone setback, this property would
become unbuildable. Additionally, it appears a dwelling could not be
located on this property accommodating this setback because septic
system requirements would be impossible to meet.
The author of the Bluff Impact Zone regulations at the DNR has
reviewed the survey and proposed dwelling plans and admitted to
the unusual property conditions and did not object to this variance.
In August 1992. we found the lot at 1485 Green Trees Rd. and sought
the advice of an architect, builder and licensed surveyor as to the
potential to build on the desired site prior to entering a contract for
sale. The surveyor collected the building requirements from the city
of Orono and created a topographical survey which indicated all
setbacks. This showed the buildable area to be restricted to the area
now known as a bluff. (The Orono building permit specifications did
not then, and do not now indicate any special requirements for bluff
zones.)
The survey also indicated the lot had an encroachment and an
easement owned by the next door neighbors. The survey also
showed the lot to be slightly below the zoned minimum acreage. We
reviewed the topographical survey with the city of Orono and asked
the zoning administrator whether this was a buildable lot or not. She
responded in writing that the lot was approved as a buildable lot in
1980 and would remain so as long as it was returned to its full size
by removing the easement and the encroachment. The next door
neighbors agreed to remove their encroaching driveway at great
expense to themselves, and to release the easement. When ali
appropriate documentation was in the hands of the title insurance
company ensuring that the land was now returned to a clear state,
we closed on the sale of this property-April, 1993.
D
1
/ ^
^ ^ - rir
* fSt
1485 GREEN TREES RD. (CONT.)
.. . /■' %
The process of filing the easement removal in the Hennepin County
court system took until this past December, a full year alter our
conversations with the zoning administrator!
W
In the meantime, based on the surveys and acknowledgement ot the
zoning administrator that this land was buildable, we hired an
architect to design a home falling within the only portion ot land
meeting the many setback requirements (again, unaware of any bluff
zone setbacks.)
After great expense to the neighbors to remove their driveway, a
$285,000 expense to us (our life savings) to purchase this lot and
design a home within what we thought was the only acceptable
location to the city of Orono. and a year of waiting for the processing
of the removal of an easement, we finally applied for a building
permit. The contractor collected the permit application and
accommodated all of the city's requests prior to the submission,
including stringent septic regulations and grading regulations
(interestingly, the grading involved the regrading of the bluff,
although no one indicated anv knowledge of a bluff zone at this
point, either.)
The builder responded to some minor issues after submission of the
permit application, and was not informed of any problems. Nine
working days after submitting the application, the builder w-as given
all indication to expect the permit and even committed to his
vendors that the construction would begin that day. Much to all our
surprise, he received a devastating phone call that very morning
from the zoning office saying they just realized this property falls
within the bluff impact zone and requires an additional 30' setback
from the bluff.
(We met with the zoning office who admitted confusion on their part
as to the interpretation of these relatively new ordinances, and we
remain uncertain as to how new residents could become informed of
this ordinance when the enforcers do not seem well informed and
they are not included in the city's permit process.)
1485 GREEN TREES RD. (CONT.)
J — 4
wen is the other setbacks required by Orono She also admitted the
location on the bluff where the dwelling is proposed is on the
eentlest part of the incline, i.e. the least objectionable portion She
ilso admitted that the dwelling was located in the only acceptable
ocatton to accommodate a proper septic system. Her cone usion w
that she would not object to this variance and agreed to issue a letter
to this effect to the city of Orono.
Without this variance, it is clear this property would be deemed
unbuildable.
We therefore, respectft^y request this variance be granted.
Sii^cer
^ J id. ihvj'f
David ^nd Margaret Vergeyl^
•»
• f
••• • . f«
#
I/O. O.^
A ,>\V^->•I
/>
CITY of ORONO
>tuMOP»* Oflh”
Pmi O0k» Bm **
Crr^^> >0—"«• SSTJ-nw*
January 3, 159-
Mr. and Mrs. David Vergeyle
1141 Dean Court. No. 3C4
Mirne-col’..= M-nne.-.cta ^ = 4--
Dear Mi. Mrs. %'ergeyle:
-r> Tar walker are willing to discharge
It: would appear that w’*th'n Let 1. Block 1, Green
and release the access lines cf Lets 1 and 2. Bicck 1^
located adjacent to ^g^’'Advises that they have agree-
Their letter of that encroaches within uo. 1.
rex.cve portions o- --e -X- -
V -.aat-rv. yeo Vcct, Crone crcinances
AS I have already advisee ea'setnerts to be i.ncluaed
wcula -ot perT.it t.ne fer the
wither, the re.ruire. . ic.^ ^ cuiitao e
A surveyor bas ^^^cen-iy reduciicr. in aw
Let 1, Flo^‘l<- 1 a lot area variance. I-
bui-dible area wouii ua/e agree to -.•eleas.^ a..^
catties vic’^ at ir.teres- area variance wou .a re.,
diidnarge the subject easement, a lOt area
"'n'l^Trees pTaJ -as approved on Sapce^« 29
;coro7al of Chat "^"lina'the sar.e as
unchanged. As long as t.^e require a xct a*ea
I960, i- would building'permit.
variance upon . h ” • ---.i «---•* w_to.
ro,iu..rod t..e ^Liatid easeoeUta that have reduoed the Ut
private owners have g.a...^-- -
Lea since the approval o. .-.e plat.
. f,. —ve^ cuesticnc on this-a. mrr if vcu have any c-— - -Please contacw my ^ = i information,
matter or ir yc^ "-sa.
Sincerely,
0^
Jeanfle A,. Mabusth . 3-01-Building 4 Zoning Aom-n.st.a-oi .
J/'-uM/ch Pealcy, 740 E. Lake Scc: Meg Vogt, Edina P.eaicy,
t., Wayzata, MN 55391
tELEPHOM. - 473-t>5: • FAX - 4tM>51®
February 24, 1994
Ms. Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Municipal Offices
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066
RE; LAND USE APPLICATION #1909, 1485 Green Trees Rd.
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
Thank you for reviewing our variance application with me today.
Please notify us if there are additional questions.
As you are aware, we are ready to begin building our home as soon
as we can obtain a variance and therefore would like to be added to
the next Zoning Commission agenda (March 21) and the very nex
City Council meeting agenda, March 28, 1994.
Sincerely,
Margaret Vergeyle
w) 686-2707
h) 920-5976
o
in(
I • .T!, _i-q.
•I.(
FEB 2 8
r
A .......
1994 4:49rM
612 686 26-81
IVI PUBLISHING in :No. 8300 ?. 2/3
(5
/
Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledfonent Form
(print naine(s)] lP«“ address]
proposed use of tte propttW
/^we) understand that in executing this ^ Sfcity
de^ OT diMpp«»*» of ” ?!,™ ,he n^Ll neiawx/s
project or use requires Council approval.
‘7‘/
Date
Property Owner Date
W««««4i4i*
I (we)
(print namc(s)][print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
also referred to as Land Use Application No. -------
aI ■ —
I iwe) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) ^ “
S ’ffi'^e"a^aS?)”aw«'oI^^^ Zrpropca«i neighbof,
project or use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
DateProperty. Owner
♦t,«t mav aiinist the City in the review of this Land Use
to the scheduled meeting date.
9
H
SCHOELL & MADSOIM, IIMC.
engineers • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
SOIL TES^NG • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
10=00 wavzata bcuuevapc • SUITE 1 . ^,1l^;^4r'C^^KA virsi =
(Q12) S4B>7B01 • FAX t6121 S4S-0OBS
=3CS-1=2S
March I5, 1994
David Vcrgeylc
%Strceier & Associates, Irx.
18300 Minnetonka Blvd., Suite 208
Wavzata, MN 55391
Subject Soil Borings for Lot 1, Block 1. Green
Trees on Tanager Lake, Orono. MN
Dear Mr. Vergcyle:
We were authorized to perform a geotechnical investigation for the above referenced
nroiect The purpose of the investigation was to gather information to assist in the evalua lo
of soil and ground water conditions relative to foundation support and construction of the
hLslear fhe bluff. Two standard penetration borings were perforrned on the TOan of
this investigation. The intetpretation of the results ate contained in this letter. The boring
locations were selected in the field by your builder Steve Streeter and our representative.
METHODOLOGY
The borings were performed with a truck mounted CME 55 rig, using 4 1/4" inside
diameter hollow stem auger. Soil samples were collected using a 2" outside diameter steel
split barrel sampler. The sampler is attached to drill rods and lowered down inside the
auger The sampler is then driven into the ground ahead of the auger using a 140 pound
haraner with a 30 inch drop. The sampler is driven 2 feet with the number of harnmci
blows recorded in 6 inch increments. The blows from the first 6 inches and last 6
inches are disregarded. The blows from the intermediate 1 foot are reported on boring
log and arc and indication of the soil strength characteristics. Samples were taken at 2 1/2
foot intervals to the termination depth of the borings. A portion of each sample was sealed
in a glass jar.
Soil identincacion was performed using ASTM D:2488 (Visual-Manual Procedures).
Preliminary classification was performed in the field, with final deierminaiion made in the
laboratory The samples will be retained and are available for your e.samination.
The holes were probed immediately after the auger was withdrawn to check for the
presence of groundwater. The holes were then backfilled with a tiiLcture of benioniie and
drill cuttings.
APP ipm ATIVE ACTICN . EGUAL CP=CP-UMlTV EMPLOYE*^
r
David Vergeyle March 15, 1994
RESULTS
Boring Logs indicating the depths and identifications of the soil strata, penetration
resistances and ground water observations are anached. The strata changes were interred
unless observed in the samples. Please note that the depths shown to the ^
approximate, the transitions in the field may vaty between bormgs and may not be sharply
defined.
We found approximatelv 4 feet of fill in boring 1. This fill was placed over the
existing topsoil. soils below 4 feet were firm sandy clays and dense s^nds "iih gravel
We found 6 inches of topsoil in bormg 2 overlying sandy clays at^ sands simi a to thc«
found in boring 1. We did not encounter fill in boring 2. Both borings ended at 17 teet.
We did not encounter groundwater in either boring.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The fill found in boring 1 is not suitable for footing suppon. The fill should be
removed under all footing and slab areas. The sandy clays and deme sands found below
W2 feet in bonne 1 and telow th. ‘ tonng 2 are suitable tor footing support. If fill
is required under” footings or slabs, the topsoil must be removed prior to fill .
fill should be non-organic and be placed in 1 foot lifts and compacted with a self-prope led
comoactor to a minimum of 90% Modified proctor density. The fill should be tested at
foot ^vertical intervals We recommend retaining the services of a competent soils engineer to
fbse^eT removal of the topsoil and placement of the fill. Any excavations for placemen
of fill that will support the footings should be oversized laterally I foot for each 1
placed The proposed structure should be placed so that there is at least a 1 H o p
between a point 2 feet outside of the footing and the toe of the slope.
The proposed footings should be sized for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure
of '»500 pouLs per square foot. This sizing is applicable footings placed on naturally
soils or on compacted fill lowest »
of 948 and the base of the slope is approximately 934. a difference of 14 fee . Th
approximate distance between the strucmre and the base of the slope is 30 feet. The exist n,
Tpc is approximaicly 2 honzonml .0 I venical. The site as curremly designed is smuble
for placement of the house.
LIMITATIONS OF EXPLOR.ATION PROGRAM
The observaiions and recommendations of this report are based on the data obtained
from 2lundard penetration borings. Soil conditions between borings may ditfer from our
0b«rva L No exploration program can fully disclose all subsurface conditions. The
“oS described can only be considered accurate at the locations and elevations sampled.
David Verse vie March 15. 1994
We are not addressing the issue of foundation or structure design in our report. If there are
changes in the scope of the project, please contact us so that we may review our
recommendations and modify them if necessary
We recommend that the location of the house be staked in the field. The horizontal
distance from the house to the base of the slope and the vertical distance be verified
construction starts. The location of the house should be adjusted if necessary to keep the 1:1
zone of influence of the footings inside the slope.
We used a survey prepared by Precision Surveys, Inc. as an aid in locating the
borings and estimating the elevation at the base of the slope. The elevations of the borings
were "shot by Schoell and Madson. Inc. personnel using the benchmark set by Precision
Surveys, Inc. The elevation of the proposed footings is based on a plan prepared by Schoell
& Madson, Inc.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON. INC.
Leonard Linton
I hereby eert^^ that this plan. specificaBOn or report was prepared bv me or under my direct supetvUion treJ that I
am a duly reaistered PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ihe laws of the State of Mlnnesoa.ly rcgisicrca
Date
Reviewed By Av
Date
g No,
ASTM
sym bol
.0
. 10
- 15
Description of Material
(ASTM D2488)
BlacK Silty ciay.itopsoii) (CL-OL)
Brcwn sandy silt, fill (ML)
Black siltv ciav. (topso!!) (CL-OU
Brown silty sand (SM)
Backfilled wiSi^entonit and cuttings.
BPF Tests and Comments
COMMENTS "Auger and sample r refusal at71/2 feet. O^set bonng 5 feet and continued samp ling from 10 feet
2 feet of frost
ScnOELL & 1>'C.
E ngineers ♦ SuRvEYCBS ♦ P uwnebs ♦ S oil Testing ♦ E nvironmental S er '^'CES
1C580 Wayzata Blvo. S uite 1. Minnetonka . Mn 55305 (6121-546-7501
PROJECT: David Vergeyle BORING NUMBER: 2
Green Trees on Tanager Lake
Ororo, MN
LOCATION See diagram
DRILLER:1 METHOD:DATE: 9 Mar 1994 IsCALE 1"= 4’
Boring Log Page of
Elev.
954.7
Depth
0.0
ASTM
sym bol
Description of Material
(ASTM D2488)
BPF WL Tests and Comments
2.5
blacK suty Clay,(topsoil) (CL-OL)
brown sandy sut, trace gravel (ML)
Brown silty sand (SM)
End of bonng @17 feet.
Backfilled with bentonite and cuttings.
COMMENTS 2 feet of frost
SOIL IDENTIFICATION TERMINOLOGY
5
X
UJ
Z
0
1
UJcn ^
500 gc/i a
ocn
o
UJz
<cro
uz
Cu
Ui
•C X
O UJ
tn 5
O f/i
S8
u 6
K Z
CO
UJ
CO
UJ
(T
2 <N
Si
K uJ
9 ^irt ►-
more than 50X LESS than 5% FINES GP POORLY GRADED GRAVEL
CF COARSE fraction
RETAINCO ON
NO. * SIEVE
GRAVELS WITH FINES
more than 12 % FINES
GMI SILTY Gf^VEL
GC|CLAYEY GRAVEL
SANDS CLEAN SANDS
LESS than 5X fines 1
sw WELL-GftAOED SAND !
MORE THAN SOX SP “PDDRlY GRADED SANO
OF COARSE FRACTION
PASSES NO. 4
SIEVE
SANDS WITH FINES
more than 12% fines !
SMI SILTY SAND
SC!CLAYEY Sand
SILTS AND CLAYS
INORGANIC,PI > 7 j
CL lean CLAY
PI < 4 ML SILT
LIQUID LIMIT
less than sox
ORGANIC OL ORGANIC CLAY
C GANIC SILT
SILTS AND CLAYS
INORGANIC
PI PLOTS ON OR ABOVE *A" LINE
CH FAT CLAY
liquid UMlT
SOX OR MORE
PI PLOTS BELOW *A* UNE
MH ELASTIC SILT
ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY
ORGANIC SILT
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT
PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION
X
UJo
o
30
20
10
0
[rOH CLASSlFJCAnON OF HN£-
ICRMHtO SOILS ANO FfWC-
VoAiiMrn roATTinM Of /i .?. A
^--------
CRAINCO SOILS
EQUATION OF ’A* L
HORl20NTAi. AT
'pi • 4 TO a - 2S.I
jR • .73(U-20)
INC
/
0'^w
MH 1 OR G 'H
y
-jY^\
L OR1 OL
BOULDERS
COBBLES
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
CLAY
OVER 12"
3" - 12"
3/4" - 3 “
NO. 4 - 3/4 “
NO. 4 - NO. 10
NO. 10 - NO. 40
NO. 40 - NO. 200
NO. 200 - .005 MM
less than .005 MM
UQUID UMIT (LL)
RELATIVE DENSITY OF
COHESIONLESS SOILS
VERY LOOSE
LOOSE
MEDIUM DENSE
DENSE
VERY DENSE
0-4 BPF
5-10 BPF
11-30 BPF
31 - 50 BPF
50+ BPF
REU\TIVE DENSITY OF COHESIVE SOILS
VERY SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
HARD
VERY HARD
0-4 BPF
5 - 8 BPF
9 - 15 BPF
16-30 BPF
30+ BPF
BPF - BLOWS PER FOOT
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
M
-
J u
PHONE NO
STATE OE
^DEPARTMENT OF NATUFfAL RESOURCES
WrO waters - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST.'^AUL, MN 55106
772-7910 1-1 FiLENO
- 8
February 18, 1994
Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota
FEB 2 5 1-^
55323
RE: MARGARET & DAVID VERGEYLE PROPOSAL, TANAGER LAKE (27-141P),
CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
I met with Margaret Vergeyle and her architect on February 17,
1994. We reviewed the proposed residence construction plan for the
lot at 1485 Green Trees Road. The proposed plan does impact a
bluff and would definitely not meet the City of Orono's current
bluff setback requirements. As we discussed on the telephone on
February 17, 1994, I advised Ms. Vergeyle that they would have to
obtain a variance from the City.
After reviewing the shape of the lot, topography and city
requirements for setbacks and drain fields, I would say that the
property has unique limitations. Therefore, we would not object to
the City granting a variance to the bluff setback on the following
conditions:
1. The design of the structure and bluff alterations must be
reviewed and approved by a registered structural or soils
engineer. This review must consider the stability of the
structure and appropriate design to minimize erosion in the
altered area during and after construction.
2. Vegetation and appropriate coloring shall be used to blend in
the alterations with the natural character of the bluff area.
NC.
Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further questions
regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Ceil Strauss
Area Hydrologist
c: City of Orono Shoreland file
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
^NE NO.
ST*TI Of
^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST-rl^l-, cHNt ^51^
772-7910 .
g f! ,..-1 "• ■ r 'n-^SiiO^^-
February 18, 1994 FEB Z 3 1S94
Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
RE: BLUFF DEFINITION, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
After discussion with Bruce, of your office, we realized that Orono
had not incorporated the alternative version (or "common sense"
version) of the toe and top of bluff definitions in its existing
ordinance. I am enclosing alternative language that the DNR -
Division of Waters developed after the field staff (including me)
complained of problems with administering the original definition.
I recommend that this alternative language be added to your list of
housekeeping and clarification amendments.
Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further questions
regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
''' J
Ceil Strauss
Area Hydrologist
Enclosure
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
rtitKi
r«»1 ir«
•■■fffiTAiirtVf
t1»W»•l«Mt
[iai'titl
[•itftifiir*
lu
Ui
I
U)
u.
O
UJ
UJ
X(/>
Oz
»-u
UJ
o
£•
2
vi
<-iQ.3»-cI-liis S oi ^S oo oO 9»-oU4 I i s i U.OUJtuI(/)oz►-olii>•HsQ.o£IUlO§S§§12QIos ocCL2CO. sS 3
V_y
\
I
ii;i§|S
ss:sissh
j
lili
ililf
'yiiy
ij:ce 61c eie 121 eC^£.£'KCC i -wiC >- . Ct
1/1 Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderllk &
Associates
Engtnttrt S Architects
March 16. 1994
Orra a
locrt •ov#'^ •
.oercr C
• Sc*v<*i *1
• Coo»
£ Scvei •£
•Mn C k-.r«crL •£
M IS#'V% C PA
•^«f f
A w^*3 Pf
Jter A OofQor ••
t '•f
sA pjrpt p?
C:>v<» 0 •?
SoDf- C A ^
^e-y A lo-tca*^ *••
A Spr>iO*^ Pf
Vr*«#» T Pf
*td « f ^ ^ •£
•♦^ynei P Arset ia- * a
»raA c lu^rei P£
f Ar*gui Pf
''ey P£
• •»- •£
PA i.C - Pv-A# Pf
M A c p
’•yyAis a PKt'ACA Pf
m<cam* c ijrxA Pf
t vi a^a Pf
n ^?w.‘A Pf
fprnttr • AAitrwjA Pf
M«f« t ft9i*t PS
M«r« P M Pf
C4'> •4' MOfP« Pf
J laoP^cp" •!
A.ijr *c« P|
Pa»« j CepA«' P£
Mr« J wi<ahit Pf
Vhe^ ft Jpr*ip« Pf
^ PA%ip C’iv*i *1 *f
k VA 0^*^ Pf
Gery D Pf
t >*oc Pavr P|
ftKP » Pf
nou^ ^ Sr^t ■!
D 3w^t•^cy‘ Pf
Cif « Oat#- P£
A If :isor
M Pp»<i^^V
V O r
► iirjP ■'4"9?
IRACE
RACKS
TER
:tion
Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusih.
Building and Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Re: Vergeylc Residence
File No. 139-1909
Dear Jeanne,
We have reviewed the geotechnical evaluation and grading, drainage and erosion control plan
prepared by Schocll & Madson. Inc. for the Vergeylc residence. The property is located on
Green Trees Road, overlooking Tanager Lake. We have several comments in regards to
engineering matters.
The two 4-foot tall retaining walls are proposed to control up to 8-feet of fill to be placed on
the existing slope. The wall as shown, and noted on this plan, is acceptable from an engineering
standpoint. However, more information must be provided to identify the specific block, tj^c
of fill and the type of tie-back restraints to be used. Each block manufacturer has specie
design charts that may be used depending on the type of fill and loading conditions. The
loading condition for th:s wall must be a 3:1 backslopc. The two walls must be placed at least
as far apart as they arc tall (1-T) or a surcharge loading must be used.
The proposed roof drains, catch basins and 10-inch pipes leading to the bottom of the slope arc
a good attempt to prevent slope erosion. However, the 10-inch pipe will have an outlc^elocity
of approximately 25 feet per second which will be difficult to control at the bottom. The pi^
may not be necessary if a good ground cover is established. The roof could be drained by
downspouts with overland flow. We feel this method has less potential for erosion.
We do not recommend or approve of gravity type retaining walls, such as the limestone boulder
wall proposed by the builder, due to the difficulty in determining their effectiveness.
Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
i).
Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E.
U)
v«V V. ^
VL« K
1
• NA e, ^ ^ ^ °
S' ^•— (j- ^ o~ or
u
f
V I
r-
t 0 m
\
O
a
or
o
0o
I*
s.
c!
4
•jo
J
3
0
1
\
i
V-s.
v%
VA
J
t£
r*
5
ti
i
0
>-
1
X
3e
-
Vi. t r- i
i'u
2
3%
‘t
«
___________\
SJNr
- ft
\Ae
O
I
*::>
>« .
>• _r
i t*}
\
N.
V
)
«3
<£
••I
L
V \ V V
tyA}/*
\
y*\^*Ta Va \'
Aif»
\\\
\
\A\\
\
\
\
\
UTI t
\
\■'f \
j
\
•t iNf
\
\'• y'^. I Xik H
. \
\ Qf'H<‘
y-\\\\\
\
X
.-r^
\A
\
\
^4v
/
• \'
A'"'
\
>
y . ^
\
#v
-mr
\
r ^
i<V *C-7
< V '
V
'v J X
V '*> ^£cavj>4r\
\\
\\
\
\
y :\-
:"v
■
N
\\'
J <r
N i
\
\ \
G’ .
_/
0*
\
\/
/
\
//•
\
y^m
V
eo9«-ez» (zi9)
NOSNUS *U S31UVH3
u^mrid • ioajjHOUv
V
saivioossv V uaiaauis ^uaanina
NW VMNOi3NNIW
3MV1 U3DVNV1 NO S33biN33bO
aON3aiS3U 31A39U3A
. f
# I #
/
Ti - n :«|«p A
:«q p»i|9«t|9
:Aq umvjp
suotsiaaj : (HI *tyuM>3 ^
2V
«« W07 /
>:r
n,M TV rj
ri
1 !110
7
<
ja.
tu;
0.
S.
-J
ivl
>
ai
j
6
J
2
3
I.
<
(/
<
5 <
01
5u
C)
U'
r
u)
7:
9:
J
u
■J
<
J
u
111
1/
\1(fe
C0S6*CZ» (Zl*)
NQSNIIS U SanUVHO
MailNVia - i031IM0«V
S31VIOOSSV ^ U3133H1S •H3Qlin0
V><NOi3NNllAI
3XV1 H39VNV1 NO S33dlN33y9
33N3aiS3U 31A30a3A
l-W :»l»p \ /
:Aq psqaaqs
:Aq UMtjp
v_.SUOISIAAI :*ou ntmios
€V
'.s ‘ir '.'\l
I ^»l *•i:
i'«i «
' . f
tu t
COS«-CZ» <219)
NOSNIIS U S31UVH3
UBNNV'M * JOailHOUV
I
saivoossv f uaiaauis :uaa'iina
NW VXNOiaNNIW
3XV1 baOVNVi NO S33UiN33UO
33N3QIS3U 31A30U3A
lu. r • -«» :*ivf> ^
tAq pai|39t|3
:Aq yMVjp
:SuoisiAai : *ou 'UIIU03
...... . .V
W
<
S
1
ll
r
N
•il
>-
AN
X
2u
Xa
<
I
b
tf«4
«Aa
♦^
»-
«. IA
0
a
0
n
a
,J^ *
S ' i
1 »
.
•c
■X
§
S
-9
\a
Iu*
i
(' «■ 1
-..« *•
. ‘ 0 ‘
t
a
i
1
jj
-0
1—1i» —--[ 1
o
r
L
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Orono Planning Commission Members
Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Mwrsc, City Administrator
Jea.inc A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator
March 17. 1994
#1910 Orono School District #278, 795 Old Cry stal Bay Road - Conditional Use
Permit/Variance - Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances
1. Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 - Conditional use permit for school year.
Required setbacks
A. Storage Shed
Required = 50’
Proposed = 15’
Variance = 35 ’ or 70%
B. Bleacher/Siorage Unit
Required = 50’
Proposed = 485’
Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) - Allowed maximum individual accessory
structure for property in excess of 9 acres.
Allowed = 3,000’ s.f.
Proposed storage structure = 2,064 s.f.
Proposed bleacher/storage structure = 372,5 s.f.
Storaee struemre attached to bleacher area = 270 s.f. bleacher area
List of E.xhibits
A - Application
B - Property Owners ’ urf
C - Plat Map
D - Survey
E - Elevation, Floor Plan, Site Plan
F - Artist’s Rendering of bleachers
G - Storage Struemre Floor Plans
H - Survey, 3065 Jamestown Road
I - Northeast Section of Survey-to scale
J - Elevation Storage Struemre
K - Wetland Map
r
Zoning File #1910
March 17, 1994
Pace 2 of 3
Description of Request
The application involves a request by the Orono School District to install a storage
structure in the northeast comer ol the property at 2,064 s.f. in area. The structure is proposed
15’ from the north lot line. The code requires a 50’ setback for all structures on school
property.
A combination bleacher/storage structure is located along the east side of the property
to the immediate west of the elementarv- and high school structures and will be kxrated 485 ’ from
the nearest lot line. The storage strucmre will be approximately 372.5 s.f. and the bleacher area
270 s.f.
The subject property consists of 1004- acres. The oversized storage shed at 2,064 s.f.
(allowed 3,000 s.f.) meets the standards of the oversized accessor>' structure ordinance. Review
Exhibit J. The storage structure is shown at 15' 6" total height. The strucmre will be used for
the storage of various field/sport activities. Review Exhibit G, note tlixxi lights are shown along
the front" side of the strucmre. We should receive confinnation as to how structure is to be
placed on site (what side is front, west or east elevation). The flood lights must be shielded
downward so as not to extend illumination beyond lot line of school into adjacent residential
neichborhood. Review Exhibit M. note existing residence strucmre is approximately 2(X)’4-
'W'
from the shared lot line.
Members may inspect the property from Jamestown Road. Note the line of trees along
the northern bounda^ of the storage structure. It is not clear from a road inspection whether
the trees are located on the school property or the residential parcel. This line of plantings will
provide screening from the 15’4- overs’zed accessory strucmre. The plan information notes
strucmre will have w'ood trim, steel siding and asphalt roof shingles.
The tennis/storage strucmre will be 13’ high at railing height. The storage strucmre will
be constructed of concrete walls with wood roof. Exterior walls shall be designed as retaining
walls. Allan Block retaining walls will extend along the sides of the bleacher. It is not clear as
to what materials will be used in the construction of the bleachers. Applicant will provide this
information at your meeting. Note the strucmre is adjacent to a Natural Environment lake along
the west side of the property. All struemres easily meet the 150’ setback from the shoreline of
the lake. The property consists of over 1004- acres in area. The original application
information did not include a hardcover inventory. Applicant has been asked to provide this
information to complete the application requirements for both zoning and building permits.
v-ii
Zoning File #1910
March 17, 1994
Paee 3 of 3
/t
Issues for Consideration
1.
40>
3.
4.
It is not clear whether applicant realizes that a 50' setback would be required for ah
structures as variance was not sought in the original application. Staff would recommend
against granting any setback variances for the oversized stmemre. Should additional
plantings be provided to screen oversized structure?
Review Exhibit E Drainage will be directed to the catch basin to the immediate
southwest of the bleacher struemre. Does this c n.h basin tie into underground drainage
system? Where does drainage eventually flow?
Can the oversized accessory- struemre be located more to the interior of the 100+ acre
parcel?
If proposed structures meet all standards of the conditional use permit, what conditions
should be included with the conditional use permit? Staff would recommend the
following:
Lighting proposed for the oversized accessory struemre must be shielded and
directed downward.
a.
b.
c.
Oversized accessory structure must meet 50’ setback from northern lot line.
Erosion control shall be installed throughout construction of oversized accessory
structure because of wetlands and Lake Classen to immediate west of struemre.
CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND tS
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address ______795 old Crvsf-il Bav Roa4
Type of Application to be Filed
Property Identification Number (P.l.D.)
OWT^R (if different than applicant)
Name
Address
Date Property Acquireduaicriuuciiv ------------------------------------------.
I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
wim CUP appUca,ion
$125.00 Residential Accessor>' Usei iammJ •
X $200.00 Instirational (church, school, etc.)
$175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments
$150.00 Duple.x CrediiyBIdg
$250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.0) Land Alteration „ . , •
----- Grading and filling • designated wetland or floodplain
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. o’- more
Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ ot lakeshore
PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule \
$100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from onginal application)
After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee
OTHER APPLICATIONS , f \
$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
~ $250.00 Vacation
$175.00 Easement Vacation
” $ 75.(X) Easement Vacation With Subdivision
^ $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule)
$3(X).00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
$100.00 Appeals
Other - see Fee Schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property school Residential Other (specify)
"•n M/\.*m W
no Mt'V •
vniiI uu
Ti 7*7
I
V /“c:/o
<mSjt /
REQUIRED SU'BMITT.ULS
1. Completed Application Form.
3* ------- Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you can obtam this list^from
------ Hennepin County' Department of Finance, A-603. Government Center. 348-a. ).
5; — CeniSe of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey
rt ^fli^Teeal description io application if not included on required survey.
7 -------^o^grlptSc su4 (extstmg and proposed contours) if land alterat.ons tnvolve
8 tTorthe le^l" w marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the
* ------- p,opertv. TOs would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current ownerts).
9 Construction plan, if applicable (see sail for requmements). oersons
10. ------- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any oth.r persons
you wish notified of this application. • ^
FOR '^p “Dt^ON™(U™ir
IS^mS-ED ^Sta^' will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be
submitted.)
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
applicalton is not complete if the above information has not been me u e .
Cettificat'on by Clerical Depanment that Land Use Application is complete.
T«;r npHr.il Staff: _________________-----------------------------------—
W • » • • W w ^
Initials of Clerical Staff:
"Unusual eSenses tnemred m review of ihis application, and cenif.es that the mtormat.on
supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant ’s signature ----, Date
tlTwldaes and agrees to U.is application and funher
Zo Sie property by dry smff. consultants, agents commission members, and Couned
members for purposes of investigation and venfication of this request.
Owner’s signamre /l^y Pate AMial
AoDiicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning sfhSulcd
Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday meeting.
please make arraneements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and adv ise the Bull g
of this change pner to the meeting.
//O .. o
4"/
•' ■■^
r-‘ 1
CITY of ORONO
PMOCIIc*B0Xi4
Cr>^ MinnfiW 55323-0)66
,r-
DATA PRI\ ACY ADM50RY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2. "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to
inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its
departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that;
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the
permit or license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the
permit or license.
j.
4.
5.
The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the
e.xtent necessary to process the permit or license.
If vour requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some
information may become public.
You have certain rights under M.S. 13.W (see following page) to review private
data on vourself
Y'our full name is required to process this application or permit.
First
I Vn. a7S
i\Iiddle Last
Address ' 0
Cir\‘
KViM SSSBG
State Zip Phone
I understand mv riahts as stated above
Sisnature
TELEPHONE -*^7357 • E\X-473-0510
•7 r \
ir »
V -Description of Request: ^ j
'^e request is for two storage buildings. One building will be
located at the east end of the High School tennis courts and will
be used for storage of tennis equipment. The roof
flat and used by spectators for viewing tennis matches. The second
building will be located near the east end of the School Distri^
property and used for athletic equipment storage. J*'®
divided^ into 5 units for separate storage of the athletic
equipment.
sa 28 -116-23 33 0005 56 28-116-25 55 0006 56 26-118-25 55 000?00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 05065 JAHESTOm RO 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIO^DmoNOINOEP SCH OIST 6276 J P 6 S K KOOB JAMES R GRABEK ET ALORONOINOEP SCH OIST 0276 JOHN P I SUSANNE K KOOB JAMES R GRABEK •
665 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RO N 5065 JAHESTOHN RO 5050 JAMESTCR6I RD • 'ifLONG LAKE NN 55556 LONG LAKE MN 5S3S6 LONG LAKE MN 55556•
•
«
i * * •
56 26 -116-25 55 0010 30 28-118-23 33 0015 38 28-118-23 33 0018
.*
05065 JAHESTOMN RO 03050 JAMESTOIM RO 03135 JAMESrONN RO »
GIB LARSON J R GRABEK t P J GRABCK M H LURTON • S E LURTON •
GARY A LARSON JAMES R t PENELOPE J GRABEK H WILLIAM LURTON
30«S JAMCST0»t4 RD 3050 JAHESTO»tl RD 3135 JAMESTOI«l RO
LONG LAKE MN SSSSfr LONG LAKE MN 55556 LONG LAKE MN 55358
*\i<*» • J^JrV iwiXii'irw J • • •
1
r ■ .
‘ ' t
. ii , ,• *H I
J * **4
^y^UlPMgNir ^ToRAfeS- Bul .O>>^&
*>tA4A • *'♦' • I’-o'
oaoJo H i6M ^k ^oou
I-—
• 1 f» 1 t___<
T^5 M. OlO CJTfStAL CAY
ORO>10 / M>4.
laomwt fl—P»« <>»*»»<»[
r
4>
o
I
i »
i I
I
i —
»—■- -
--------______
’CM* •
«« •>•€ «• %«•• ••
V
%
*.Mi M*4
v£>
/✓n'j
M
I' I
!t
>-------1
» I
' ^U.«ii V *»I
•.! •.ikS V.
••^—— HCrucl L N^UUA
. u
uci I'
APCNfftCfe
' --------\--------——
jS’y^*-------^------------1—--•‘•.«»»—•«» ««•»-» ne^
Tifo •'•*» j;t’ •••*••
' /
I
«r*i*i J5LAN
j«*. • “ • •• •
u _
•••••• • • K
'••• •• • •
«<r*«
;.vtt
TJr^,
mmJBm t
TCNIIIS WIST
RNUY tSOS HIT.
\noxcT I
TENNIS COURT
tTOMQI rAOUTT
ONONO H. S.
ORONO. MNN.
<^6 TI t BLOa 6«C'*'iOM
•-• m 0a
Mc«t(tiM utt mjt
< If /
! . V • •HCMMi^ cowT^« laniiisoTAI®
><r'
1^r»
Ml 1
Am 6#« ' > 5«« M «*• n
A • 9* V Vt tl B
; ,i(!lr
“"W
Detail
Scaie • liech*20fe^t
iim ;\
if 5
I
‘M
:
ii
;'{
I »:l
/
//
Plat cf Sur-zey
for Robert r. liilchel
of Lot 5, ciocK 1, Liberty Acres
Kenne pla Co ty, Kime 30 ta
THIS mu HAS BEEH
MCROFILIIED
prcverento or ei.croachsents
Scale ;
Date :
o :
1" = 10C»
10-7-76
Iron moricar
«:ioraon R, Coffin Re.^No. cCn4
Lerjd SiC"/e/or ar.d Planr.er
Lone Lake, Klnnesota
tAP.t?' -• * r ■' ■D 1-^ A-. —• •--=—•■I'--.—■ ■■■•■••v:..•1.1PFI cl ^VAT'OM : V* -. r<* “gen #nI*
^-----. ^ »!■ .A* • • *
0
\
%
_____^ \n —
/
\\—„ , _
%
\
0 1
/
— — -' • -1 X » •« -r.
tP.otJT B^EVATIOU
•etAcr. • '/*' • I'-c?'
•■##>*:**
: OKO'tJO »
T*
U OLD
m^o^a. M»
r
-I Ifiili
IBPl liilini-5;'<
if t i-vifilA'-*. ■>■''
mm&
* *%y^4f r" I
|S> (i-^%-:- S' ^
SS5^
T w I ^=^'^’'''-
•t5:v?r.;'Aic;j>m^w
X s
\
'^1
TO:Orono Planning Commission Members
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembcrs
Ron McK^rse. Citv Administrator
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE:March 16. 1994
SUBJECT: #1911 Ernest Lemmerman. 4620 Tonkaview Laiw - Variances - Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.24. Subd. 5(B) - Lot area variance
Required = 43.560 s.f. or 1 acre
Proposed = 20.900 s.f. or .47 acres (prior to lot line rearrangement
33,975 s.f. or .78 acres)
Variance = 22.6#^0 s.f. or 52%
Section 10.56. Subd. 3 u • .i,^
Definition 2 Bluff - Topographic fearure such as a hill, cliff or embankment having the
following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18% over a distance
of 50' or more shall not be considered part of the bluff)-
A. Part or all of the feamre is located in a shoreland area;
B. The slope rises at least 25’ above the ordinary high water level of the
water tody;
The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25’ or more
above the ordinary high water level averages 30% or greater, and
The slope must drain toward the water body.
C.
D.
Toe of the bluff means the lower point of a 50’ segment with an average slope exceeding
18%. Top of tne bluff means the higher point of a 50’ segment with an average slope
exceeding 18%.
Definition 3 Bluff Impact Zone - A bluff of land located within 20 from the top ot a
bluff.
Definition 26 Steep Slope - Lands having average slopes of 18% or greater as measured
over horizontal distances of 50’ or more, that are not bluffs.
Section 10.56. Subd. 7, Classification of public waters - General Development Forest Lake,
OHWL 929.4
Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C-2) - Setback from top of bluff.
For all structures = 30’
Zoning File #1911
March 16. 1994
Page 2
Section 10.56. Subd. 16(C-3) - Bluff impact zone stnictures and accesM>r> facilities, except
stairways, landings and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zone.
detenmned necessary , conditions shall be attached to issue permits to prevent erosion and
preserve existing vegetation screening of stnictures. vehicles and other facilities as viewed trom
the surface of public waters, assuming summer leaf on vegetation.
Section 10.56, Subd. 16(1-2) - Vegetation alterations. Intensive vegetation clearing within 75
of the shoreline and on steep slopes within the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited Limi c
cleanng of shrubs and trees less than 6" in diameter and cumng. pmmng and trimming ot trees
of anv size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to
accommodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings. P';;";"
beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided that the screening of
structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water assuming summer leaf on
conditions, is not substantially reduced.
slopes of 30% or greater.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners List
D - Sewer As-Built Providing Stub for Undeveloped Property
E - Building Envelope Defined before Topographic Information Provided
FI- Site Plan of Topography Reflecting Impact of Blutt Impact Zone
on Undeveloped Lot .
F2- Proposed Building Envelope and Variance within Bluff Impact Zone
G - Topographic Map Designation
II - Section - Profile
' ■ Ehm°ral^g Envelope
Review of Applicfltion
The subdivision of a loi line rearrangement was presented to the Coundl for conceptual direction
bifore applicant proceeded with the filing of the variance application, the formal plat and
r
Zoning File #1911
March 16. 1994
Page 3
poss,b.c ^giMrauon oflands Cch„k-,1
x‘.a wu. .„.pa. ..ne bc.. ....
the ctxle sections listed abi)ve
Mike Gaffron has prepared vanous exhibits to bluff,
determination of a blutf impact zone an ® '■ - ^ j-j- this case is the
in an average slope exceeding 18% (9 nse in 50 ).
and recommendation.
Thi. i. the second arplicat.on of your March
areas upon proposed budding sites. restrictive guidelines in the
p..ssible code of the bluff ends. Review Exhibit F. the
denntuon tn the uxie defies '':„u;nhe"st^.e regula.ton and nun,mire
the top at another. The ^ dial our City aeems to have
impact on steeper elevation of bluft are . . ., snecific code section because we
more questions and problems with t e ^ler municipalities have not begun to
have chosen more resiiiciive standards. I may ^ tot otor m p ^
deal with the requirements ol implementing this section, we win coni,
t DNR whenever variances to the current code section are required.
Issues for Consideration
Review Eahibiis R and F2.
^mllg'e:ve"J^""h'vher elevations bu, more gentle sloped ponion of this
property?
D ... P.hihi, I the lower elevations of the original lo, have more gentler topographies^
Review L.xhi . .nnlicant that lot line rearraimemcnl be readjusted so that a
Should we recommend to ^ ,,^pcd p„nions of the property
building envelope IS I .-es, ^sre id of Ihc north? This
:llTrefTrwhole‘’Uose and in.em of Mr. Lemmennan-s comprehensive
application?
1.
r
Zoning File #1911
March 16. 1994
Page 4
W
Options of Action
Approval of variance application as proposed granting an area variance and a variaiKC that
would allow encroachment of the bluff impact zone; or
Denial of variance application and recommend that applicant consider an amended lot line
rearrangement proposal that would provide a second building envelope to the north side ot
propertv where slopes are more gentle and suitable for building construction.
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCF, APPLICATION^ L
Initial Application Fee $200.00 '
($50.00 per each additional variance) ^
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $2(X).00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION , , / ^ -
Site Address 7 iO iSX ki-LViA ^1.___> ■ / , Tf; 4, rv O.—*
rrrv r»r
» » V*
rry tir
: rfprrc
I
f ‘ ‘f V/»iV“0
A ..^w'Vfc. WWV
V A
TlTl
i.*Xi
(k W • V V
V • W
r r'LTCf"^^TLAL‘1k vTWi
wiA» » »*
*1*
t V
■ *Vw* * V' ^ f
^:yS:2C iCCi aoi ~cs:49
• •
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_________________--------------
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired yT'/d*-!______/
I (doV (do not) also own the adjacem parcels of land.
Present use of property: ^ 'X. residential ___other (specify)
Zoning District:__________________________________
(month/year)
APPLIC/VNT . , n
Name
Address: /-^^7
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name ----------------------------------
Phone (honK)
_____ Phone(work)_
Citv:
V7-2 -9 3'/;
Zip: i>S30^
Phone<home)
Phone (work)_
Address:Citv:Zip:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST gtinutedgnstnictionCostS------^
Deicnbe request indeuil:
_______7't i. *<A. i-*-'
(\/ r
irhttach additional sheets it necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
V Lot Area _
Setback:
___Lot Width
Front Side
Hardcover
Rear
Other (specify)
Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
hardship /description of unusual PROPERTY' CONDITIONS
I^“ ribi uSife h^hip or practical diff.culre or unusual property condmons preventing
compliance with Zomng O^dc requirements:
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
REQUIRED SUBMIT! ALS
AH of the followins infonnatlonmust be submitted bv the application deadline date in order
for vour duplication to be considered complete:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I
5. K
6.
7.
8.
9.
Completed Application Form
Certitied Propertv' Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Go\i Center. 348-3271).
Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).
Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x IP for
reproduction.
Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 81'i" x II" for reproduction.
Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/^" x 11").
List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Ple.ase remember that vour
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT’S signature :
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all infonnation required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or consultant expeases incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is true_and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant’s Signature ivZt \L ' —A"Date , | V
C/
OWNER’S fGNATTJRE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by Citv' staff, consultants, agents Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner’s Signature Date '772r,),. ) /V
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at ail scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coimnissiun
and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements
to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of
this change prior to the meeting.
^ 13 /T7 h/r? a
/L 6:07 <3. r- /)7 4 't'n/)
f^ct i
J
r
|(lt| DATE Ol/il/94
I • •.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OMTCRS LIST
BATCH 005
■ ;*; '■ ■. • • <1
‘ ’ ,..5$ 07-117-2S 52 0028
ADOR . 04655 TONKAVIEH LA
Olt€R HAHE DENNIS A MEYER
TAXPAYER DENNIS A MEYER
HAME/ADDft, 4680 NORTH SHORE OR
' HOUNO MN 55564
PROP ADOk
OHNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AOOR
58 07-117-25 52 0045
04640 TOTACAVIEH LA
KENTCTH J HICKEY
KENNETH J HICKEY
4640 TONKAVIEH LA
HOUNO MN 55564
PROP AODR
OHNER NAME
TAXPAYER
HAME/AODR
PR(H» AODR
OHNER NAME
TAXPAYER
' NAME/ADOR
: . \ ,
•• . * A » *
* •
». * •
• »
58 07-117-25 52 0047
J4690 TONKAVIEH LA
HAS BULL
HILLIAH A BULL
4690 TONKAVIEH LA
MOUTR) MN 55564
t
TOTAL BATCH 005 00027
50 07-117-25 52 0029
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
DErt4IS A MEYER
DENNIS A MEYER
4680 NORTH SHORE DR
MOUND MN 55564
38 07-117-25 52 0045
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGr^ED
J 0 D0LE2AL A J A ROSTAD
J 0 DOLEZAL A J A ROSTAD
4650 TOrACA VIEH LA
HOUNO MN 55564
58 07-117-25 52 0050
04680 NORTH SHORE DR
DENNIS A MEYER
DEmiS A MEYER
4680 NORTH SHORE DR
MOUT40 MN 55564
I
REPORT NO. PI4554Q1
PAGE 12 .
, V
58 07-117-25 32 0050
01510 REST POINT LA
G M REICH A L F REICH
S M A S J SCHMIDT
1510 REST POINT LANE
MOUr40 MN 55564
‘ • .
4
58 07-117-25 52 0046
04650 TONKAVIEH LA
J D DOLEZAL A J A ROSTAD
J 0 DOLEZAL A J A ROSTAD
4650 TCITKA VIEH LA
MOUND MN 55564
I • . ..
I
36 07-117-23 32 0052
01315 RbST POINT LA
K J GROVTR ASK GROVER
KEVIN J GROVER AND
SUSAN K GROVER
1315 REST POINT LA
MimETRISTA MN 553A4
r
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HEW4EP1N COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO JME BEST
OF NY KNOHLEOGE Af40 BELIEF.
OAT ,/MW.
> i
» > .
I
»
•*
J ••
I
B ' #
r I • • •
• ;
I I
I *
J i.
. %
I . • *
*
■ ^
. s
HUN DATE 01/11/H
BATCH OOS
PROP ADOR
OHT^R NANS
TAXPAYER
HAME/ADOR
PROP ADOR .
ONNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AOOR
PROP ADOR
OMT^R NATC
TAXPAYER
NAME/AODR
PROP ADOR
OHNER NAHE
taxpayer
HANE/AOOR
V ’ ^
PROP ADOR
ONNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
. NAHE/ADDR
PROP AODR
ONNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADOR
i:.*cr
» ■ •
•»
HCI4NEP1H COUNTY PROPEHTV INFORMATION SYSTEM
PRW»ERTY OWCRS LIST
M 07-117-25 25 0025
01181 NILOHURST TR
ARNOLD H SOSKIN
ARNOLD H SOSKIN
802 EDCEHOCm.OR
HOPKINS MN S55A5
18 07-117-25 51 0018
01520 REST POINT CIR
PATRICK RAY JURGEF4S
PATRICK JURGENS
1520 REST POINT CIR
HOUND MN 555AA
58 07-117-25 51 0027
01288 NILOHURST TR
HARIT 8IRKELAN0
ROBERT L • HARIT 8IRKELAN0
1298 NILOHURST TRAIL
HOUND HN 555AA
58 07-117-25 51 0051
01299 NILOMJRST TR
SEC OF HSG A URB DEV
SEC OF HSG • URB DEV
220 2ND ST S
HPLS HN 55A02
58 • 07-117-25 51 0058
01219 NILOHURST 1R
GARY N NELSH ETAL
GARY N NELSH
1219 NILOHURST TRL
HOUND HN 55569
58 07-117-25 52 0025
09625 TONKAVIEN LA
HAS NOLO
NINTON 0 A SHERYL L NOLO
9625 TOfA^AVlEH LA
HOUND HN 55569
58 07-117-25 51 OOi
01270 NILDHUtST TR
JAR STASIK
JAMES STASIK
1270 NILOHURST TRAIL
HOUND MT4 55569
58 07-117-25 51 0019
09595 NORTH SHORE DR
HAROLD L ALBRECHT ETAL
HAROLD L ALBRECHT
9595 NO SHORE OR
MOUND MN 55569
58 07-117-25 51 0028
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ROBERT L BIRKELANO A NIFE
ROBERT L BIRKELANO
1298 NILOHURST TRAIL
HOUND MN 55569
58 07-117-25 51 0052
01297 NILOHURST TR
E J LEMMERMAN ETAL
ERNEST J LEMMERMAN
1297 NILOHURST TR
HOUND MN 55569
58 07-117-25 51 0058
01261 NILOHURST TR
S H HENNESSY A K L HENNESSY
S M A K L HENNESSY
1261 NILOHURST TR >
MOUND m 55569
58 07-117-25 52 0026
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
J R ABRAHAMSON/0 ABRAHAMSON
JAMES R A 0ANT4 ABRAHAMSON
19975 90TH PL N
PLYMOUTH MN 55996
REPORT NO. PI955901
PAGE 11 ‘J
58 07-117-25 51 0017
01557 REST POINT CIR
STEVEN M BEC^AFT
STEVEN M BECRAFT
1557 REST POINT CIR
MOUNO MN 55569
• ■ ;
** .
k
‘V
• f •
. I 7 . !! .
58 07-117-25 51 0026
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
ROBERT L BIRKELANO ETAL
ROBERT L BIRKELANO
1298 NILOHURST TRAIL
MOUNO MN 55569
‘‘ \
K
. «
t
h • '
*9
A
58 07-117-25 51 002?
0<^510 NORTH SHORE OR
P SAHICKI I K H SAHICKl
P SAHICKI IKK SAHICKI
ASIO NORTH SHORE OR
HOUNO MN 5556^
’ t
■•A .** » •
i •»
56 07-117-25 51 0055
00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
ERNEST J I MARY J LEM1ERMAN
ERNEST J I MARY J LEMMERMAN
1297 NILOHURST TRAIL
MOUNO MN 5556^
y.
I- * . , >
' *' p
• . 8 I
56 07-117-25 52 002^
00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
KATHLEEN G ASH
KATHLEEN G ASH
<^589 SHORELINE DR flOl
SPRING PARK m 5556^
■> « '
. ;
* •' I
58 07-117-25 52 0027
09655 TOtKAVIEH LA
HAY2ATA PROPERTIES INC
HAYZATA PROPERTIES INC
P 0 BOX e
EXCELSIOR MN 55551
i
•t .i:-
• 1 '
7 f
r
ERNEST LEMMERMANIN LOT 46. TONKAVIEW GARDENSHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
lA ERNEST LEMMERMANIN LOT 46. TONKAVIEW GARDENS HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
X y
y’ \\
/
\
\
/
/
/
^6673
/'
./■7
/
X"' I .'
_,C *
/' #/#4# ■
W:>.i
/
••
/I
I
/
/
^ «
l\
/
y
1^'/
/
I
y'
/ / ^>v, %
^ M//; /X .W
i T
/ /
\ s/«/ J-7 ./y ' W >, ^ /
\ V'/\X' • ' / K'^\\ X\ \ 7-A \i ‘^epy / 3 r\va%./^%
\
■X
^ ^ i 7^it) y
k»
' f