HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-22-1994 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMIiSSTON MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994, 7:00 P.M.
2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL representative : - JoEllen Hurt
ATTENDANCE
AppUcants presenting proposals before the Commission are asked to move to the
podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the
Chairman.
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS\PUBL1C INFOR.NLATION MEETING
1 7 00 p.m.1^1903Ernest Lemmerman,1297Wildhurst Trail/4620 TonkaviewLane-
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement.
2 7'30 p.m. #1905 John Powers/Ken HopkLis, 75/85 Femdale Green - Subdivision of
a Lot Line Rearrangement
ACTION ITEMS- Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public
hearings.
3.#1897 R. Hunt Greene and Jane E. Piccard. 865 Panenwood Road - variances -
continuation of public hearing.
4.#1903 Tandem Properties, 2645/3025 Watenown Road - preliminary subdivision -
continuation of public hearing.
5.#1902 Dan R. Guenthner. 120 Golden View Drive - conditional use permit - public
hearing.
6.#1904 Eric and Shelly Liljequist. 3490 Birch Lane - variances - public hearing.
Planning Commission Comments
7.Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of February 14,
1994.
8.Other issues for discussion.
If
PLANNING CONCVIISSION MEETING - TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994, 7:00 PJM.
Additional Items
9. planning Commission approval of minutes of the January 18, 1994 meeting.
10. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the March 14. 1994 meeting of
the Council.
11. Planning Commission schedule of B-2 workshop 2/23/94 at 5.00 p.m.
12. Joint Mectmg of the Council and Planning Commission, March 11. 1994, 8:00 A.M.,
Council Chambers
adjournment
05=r u
•i ~
1-
»—.om
n'
:j
S- ® n
|r.§a?
IT • <Kn
O tj (/)
CJ’^ O3 "
n - V
?!•
n!i?‘Ip- a
n* O1 ^ i |3»
PI
si
I
♦
I
To:Orono Planning Commission Members
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorse. City Adminiiirator
From:
Date:
Subject:
Jeanne A. Mabusth, BuildLng & Zoning Administrator
Fcbruaiy 17, 1994
#1903 Ernest Lemmerman. 1297 Wildhurst Trail'4620 Tonkaview Lane
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement
Pertinent Ordinances
1. Chanter 11 - Class II Subdivision.
Section 10.24 - LR-IB Lot Standards.
Lot 1
Required = 43,560 s.t. or 1 acre
Existing = 33.975 s.f. or .78 acres
Proposed = 20,900 s.f. or .47 acres
Variance Before Subdivision = 9,585 s.f. or 22%
Variance After Subdivision = 22,660 s.f. or 52%
Lot 2
Existing = 12,750 s.f. or .29 acres
Proposed = 24,600 s.f. or .56 acres
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B
C
Property Owners List
Plat Map
D - Planning Commission Action Notice
E - Planning Commission Minutes 8/16/93
F - Sewer As-Built
G - Original Sketch Plan
H - Preliminary Plan
I - Detail of Building Envelope for Undeveloped Lot
Description of Request r , i. t
Applicant has fulfilled directives of Planning Commission at time of sketch plan review.
The required topographic information will be included in your packets either on Thursday or
. - f viy»*nfhpr rp'jtricted outside activities
i he requuxa lopo^rapnic uuuimauuu vrui ... ----------------- - - . .
presented at your meeting. Unformnately, the extreme cold weather restricted outside activities
but surveyor has confirmed they will be available for your review. Note the rear lot line of
existing developed lot has been moved 12’ further south maintaining a mi^um 15’ setback
from the existing garage. Note survey shows a 7’ 3" setback to the west side lot line.
As noted in the earlier review, a sewer unit has been assessed against the undeveloped
parcel. Access to the proposed new building site off of Tonkaview Lane must be approved by
the Public Works Director.
Zoning File # 1903
February 17, 1994
Page 2
Since the sketch plan review staff has learned that part of the subject property is torrcns
property and the lot line rearrangement must be recorded as a formal plat. Note surveyor’s
notations advising of vague descriptions for boundaries of undeveloped lot along Wildhurst Trail
and Tonkaview Ijne. Surveyor has advised that the plat will not be accepted by Registrar of
Title Office with these boundary discrepancies. Applicant must file for a registration of
undeveloped lot for plat to be accepted by the County.
The applicant chose not to file a variance application with the subdivision application.
Before Mr. Lemmerman priKeeds with any further expenditure of funds for registration of
propertv', filing of variance application and platting costs, the proposed subdivision will be
presented for Council ’s conceptual approval.
fhe Planning Commission may act on the current preliminary subdivision application but
the final plat cannot be presented for Council ’s formal and final action until the registration of
the property is completed. If Council conceptually approves the proposed realignment of lot
lines, applicant may proceed with the necessary steps to complete the subdivision, file a lot area
variance for the undeveloped lot and commence registration of remaining property. If Council
denies proposed lot line rearrangement, applicant may file a lot area variance for the existing
lot at .78 acres.
Issues for Consideration
1. Should shared lot line be readjusted at northwest comer of proposed Lot 2 so that
existing garage meets 10’ side yard setback?
2.Upon review of the topographic information, does the newly proposed division line
reflect limitations of physical boundaries?
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission ’s recommendation of approval must include the following
conditions:
1.
2.
3.
Application cannot be presented for Council ’s action until registration of abstract
lands is finalized.
Designation of drainage and utility easements 10’ wide along the perimeter
property lines of both lots and 5 ’ along the interior.
Realignment of side lot line so that existing garage can meet 10’ side setback --
any other changes to reflect topographic natural boundaries of properties?
Isv
kmimom material necessary for complete preliminary application
1. Completed Application Form
2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Suryey.
3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within (you must obtain
348-3271) Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt'Center
4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
completV^*^^°” Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is
Zoning Official's Signature Date
<3 m ^ “
2.
Title opinion.
4. Easements, Covenants, etc.
5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit.
FEES
Sketch Plan Review (Class 1, II & m)§200.00
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement
Preliminary Review (Class I & ll Subdivision)
Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-resldential)
qooTooN
300.00
325.00 +
25.00/Lot
Final Plat Review (Class III)
•(Plus any legal or engineering charges)175.00
Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application
Renewal of Final Subdivision Application
150.00
100.00
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
Plannina'co^lssf Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney,
Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this anni i <-■»
further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordiMnce.
Applicant's Signature Date
Ovmer
C7 Date
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
J
gi-.i M v.« »a MAW «k« ,#« «\'-A■■•■■';^;i \m■ aONNIR HAM S« 07rll7-ZS S2 0020 moo AWm J (K«5S TONKAVIEM la ~ DENNIS A NEVER DfNNXS A NEVER A«60 NORTH SHORE OR NNjV fSJiA. f i t:tis 07-U7-25 S2 004S OASAO ^ TONKAVIEN U KE»METH J HICKEV KSMR^TH J HICKEV
lAAAO TONRAVIEN LA
HE>«CPIN COUNTV PROPERTY INTORNATION SVSTEH PROPERTV OHNERS LISTSO 07-117-25 52 002A 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGTCD DENNIS A NEVER DENNIS A NEVER 4480 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND Itl 555AA58 07-117-23 32 00A5 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO J 0 OOLEZAL A J A ROSTAD J D DOLEZAL A J A ROSTAD
AA50 TONKA VIEN U
NOUNO m 5554A
'v,4/ ‘
' ♦
I.
At'-" ■ ■j' :*
*
' A* ^ v'V ‘i* iltlM
4]
St T9t~U7>23 St 00A7
DASM' TOMCAVIEN LA
|^t^ iU|.L ; . • ; -
, HILLXAH A tULL " ‘
totka Vien U ,
‘.r ■
I
i
c '
-isy ‘i”*" *1
-'i
003 00027
v
‘i
■ -oK H i ■H
c 't: 1Kv’*'®' . . V f • •
R * A *
'>r» ^ * . •. ;'* *• •'
4. •k
8.1
r
S'fi
'LT ^ P C
r 1•. ■: Ij
»p?:K*?-
. ■■■.
. i
58 07-117-aS 5^ OOSO
04880 NORTH SHORE DR
DENNIS A MEYER
DENNIS A mYER
8880 NORTH SHORE DR
MOUND MN 55384
t
I «•
V
■ to •
• •(• A
V •
• «■•!
Vi *...
«•’
REIK»T NO. PIA35A01 PACE 1238 07-117-23 52 0050 01510 REST POINT LA C H REICH A L F REICH $ H A S J SCHHIOT 1510 REST POINT LANE HOUND NN 553AA N*.'• *-> A,I •"•A•1.11vv.*. r :1 •■■ .r' T-to V vi.vAv.^'. •. V ';. ■, ^L'. ’K-- •'•■ ■ v' -' i:..:.m. • ’ i «%38 07-1X7-23 32 004804850 TONKAVIEH LA J 0 OOLEZAL I J A ROSTAD J 0 DOLEZAL I J A ROSTAD
4850 TONKA VIEH LA
HOIM) HN 55384
38 07-117-23 32 0052
01315 REST POINT LA
K J GROVER i S R GROVER
KEVIN J GROVER AND
SUSAN K GROVER
1315 REST POINT LA
HINNETRISTA HN 55384
* VtA» 4 '. ' , *t„ *■>“ K’ •
• ■ ^ 'U''^r-
■ • *-K‘• '
I ' W‘ * I W'to .'•‘ir
'■ V'-:V
NS4,':aV
' T V.ri
P.;v "Y , y-'-v •. . I
’•i - V'i--i *
r •■•-TV;;
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY XAXATION. TO THE BEST
OF NY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF
DATI
ARl^t^
^ 'V *11.*
' : t
.
♦.
;:'V ...ri' -ra*
. I. t3 «>» •fl7-^^'« **Oll#|/ '^ttlOHURST Tt MNOLP H SOSKIN «NOLO n SOSKIN Ot gOOCNOOR.DR HE^•4CPI^^ COUNTY PROPERTY INFORtUTlON SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST
m^--
ti5 ppno^ >
•^07«U7-» n'ooiaLtmST POINT CIR
•#WXrt |UY JURKNS
.•RTWaC^JUROfNS-
»tg pitT POINT cm
97-U7-25 51 0027
'MTLBHURST TR,_ _,, 9im ^KILOHURST TR
«»!/N*«fei'j*W «7l£5r .i«iu»
KtinUlWST TMa
*/*• ’ •
l^ JSr-07:117-25 51 0051* (JJassi-.a
;
Hse • uw oEV
fNp JT s i
-^5402
^ ' i#lii
♦• .
r ■
/
MTOWl^-M 51 0050
WtOMU^T TR
)
{%.t
i
r
I
I*
ti •»
•i >■ 'f
V-. V' Vi
H NfVSH ETAL
___H»€LSN-
E14 NZLOHURST TRL
W'l'?5504
i ■ ■
ipSsRW'fc^ttHTON 0 » SHERYL L NOLO
IN^wg^ffOAtS TOMUVIEN LA
“*S 'r >.V.v--Y- .1
•\:U
fr.
: .V--
H‘-- •
«•
' J '■ '
V
I :.v^
1; , K ,.,;t .. •
58 C7-117-25 51 001501270 MILOHURST TR J I R STASIK JAMES STASIK 1270 HUOMURST TRAIL MOUND 7M 555A458 07-117-25 51 0015 04545 NORTH SNORE OR
HAROLD L AL8RECHT ETAL
HAROLD L ALBRECHT
4545 NO SHORE OR
MOUND FM 55544
. ’ %I .fA
I ’ • ' '
/ 1
• •*4
t*
■ .»
0 .
% P
I
■ k •♦
A *
58 07-117-25 51 0028
00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ROBERT L BIRKELANO A WEB
ROBERT L BIRKELANO • ;
1258 MILOHURST TRAIL ’
mound mm 55544
58 07-117-25 51 0052
01297 MILOHURST TR
E J LEMMERMAN ETAL
ERNEST J LEMMERMAN
1297 MILOHURST TR
MOUND MN 55544
, •
• .9\ ' r
\%
58 07-117-25 51 0058
01241 MILOHURST TR
f \
t,’
S M HENNESSY A K L HETtCSSYi'
» . • . 1 *.
' *1?• '* \s ,
■*}■> •
* ‘ ‘t i •«■
’•I'' •
. •• t
P 4
S M A K L HE7t«SSY
1241 MILOHURST TR
mound W 55544
\
V
• p
38 07-117-25 32 0024
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
J R ABRAHAMSON/0 ABRAHAMSON
JAMES R A DAMN ABRAHAMSON
14475 40TH PL N
PLYMOUTH m 55444
w* ■-
# »•■ /r; .
t %• f
N 'REPORT NO. PIH5S401 PAGE«. PI455401 , , .V, . t 4 1 fja J;. .V -ftr'Y.' •! f.■' ‘Sw;iv ■v,^::,Av:..38 07-117-25 51 001701557 REST POINT CIR STEVEN M BECgAFT STEVEN M BECRAFT 1557 REST POINT CIR MOUND rt4 5554458 07-117-25 51 0024 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
ROBERT L BIRKELANO ETAL
ROBERT L BIRKELANO
1298 MILOIWRST TRAIL . ,
mound MN 55544
58 07-117-25 51 0029
04510 NORTH SHORE OR
P SAMICKI A K M SANICKI
P SANICKI A R H SANICKZ
4510 NORTH SHORE DR
MOUM) MN 55544
38 07-117-23 31 0033
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ERNEST J A MARY J LEttCRHAN
ERNEST J A MARY J LETtCRMAN
1297 MILOHURST TRAIL
MOUND MN 55544 . »V \ r
- - - - - -- ^
:• v..,-5 k’Vif>
38 07-117
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
KATHLEEN 6 ASH
KATHLEEN 0 ASH . '
4589 SHORELINE DR 8101
SPRING PARK MN 55584
38 07-117-23 52 0027
04455 TONKAVIEH LA
MAYZATA PROPERTIES INC
MAYZATA PROPERTIES INC
P O BOX 8
EXCELSIOR MN 55551 ,
(in”7T. V -/ ^ ,9/> .*v '• iC6)(57)/^V7 ■'.;'^/s %ft «3 4 Si -^ ..Vw'6^ -1i-:33L (47)W1<• "I N4 1 O /-^1 'XC7'-^^1 ■^ii —~y 5®^-i -v’{r)i^>v/y V*.2 (451V a:“ TOMSCAVIgJff. "'' ^? Y 1 Aft A.(46)? (38) ;’J ■K (3^i \
7.^>4 n (9)
V
21)7 5
v:
V.
46^ )
14) V
^ 4
je ^
1 (^3)|SAI^DESilS L (15)
N8^*T6-#
fC4
V»<-^
(27)
44 «
C4ST LINC
C7 < L S H3?
7
Pt ly
ka» 79.
(5C) I
Sniffs
^7 0*
is^ wl^( 26) g
TsT K
(13)
t\ (32)’/
(26)O.
J
rt*A ? f ?».05
.(31)
/v
36.2 (24)/(27)
7
V.
/
/
^ 64 T9
1.66
** /
'(IS)
'(17)V <
,2s (58)
c M
■-S ■ >..
c/thistas«a;
COTI2
'(»)
9?II
;
.z''fk 56)7^O M \^ n
ST^\(29)1
(29)
:?53.
(30)
‘.i:
,<• #
P'W
S
i r
(53)V (52)9
►X ; r"
350 5/ss’■NeRW.35'
6*469 9? 4 15
\X X 6r 61 37 57
( »7)
(34)(I*
.t
\V.c- C9).
TMCCn T
(TLi
(39)
\
14;. 3
■7
V'
(5)
16
(37)
5
\,
>>> j’
-V (M)7 “\> IJ
\■\
V
‘V
Cm 271
^ *
A ^__
(37)V
*. ►
37)
£*SI U»<
Cf * I S itW
- j^94.T9
<5*vY '-9*
n 'J!- V.
'9a
A z
97.™r'
NOT
TANOCNT
1^4
iS. f >
^./' '>
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
ZONING FILE #1845
NOTICE OFPLAiNNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: August 25, 1993
TO: Mr. and Mrs. Ernest J. Lenunerman
1297 WUdhurst Trail
Mound, MN 55364
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision/Sketch Plan
DATE OF MEETING:8/16/93 VOTE No formal vote of the Planning
Commission is required for
Sketch Plan reviews
The Planning Commission provided the following conceptual direction:
The Planning Commission looked favorably upon the proposed lot line rearrangement and
concurred with the staff that upon review ot required topographic information, the City may
request that the building envelope of the vacant propern' be e.xpanded by taking additional land
to the north and west of your homestead property. The Plarming Commission also agreed that
the lot area variance was reasonable with lot proposed at approxunately 19,000 s.f.
Staff would recommend that this subdivision be completed as a plat rather than a metes
and bounds subdivision. It is not clear whether the property has been platted with the drainage
and utility easements along perimeter boundaries of each lot. The surveyor should make that
determination to determine if a vacation would also be necessary. The City will request that
drainage and utility easements be defined along the perimeter of each of the lots if they have not
been dedicated with the original subdivision of the property. At the time of the filing of your
formal plat, the City will ask for topographic information to determine whether additional area
from your homestead can be given to the undeveloped lot.
Staff would recommend that you meet with your surveyor to determine benefits of
platting the lot line rearrangement. Staff would also recommend that you arrange to meet with
staff prior to filing the application so that staff can make any other recommendations.
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Fee = $300.00
It is staffs understanding that you will apply for a lot area variance application with the
subdivision. Please advise staff if you plan to submit a development plan. If so, preliminary
sketches or floor plans should be provided along with conceptual elevations of proposed stracture
and survey of the newly configured lot locating strucmre on survey. Surveyor should also
include topographic information on survey.
Lot Area Variance Application — $175.00
Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the review
of your sketch plan or of your pending subdivision/variance applications. Please be advised that
the review of the subdivision and variance application will be separate applications and reviewed
on their own merits.
Isv
* i
)f
• i
minutes of the ORONO planning CONLMISSION MEETING
HELD AUGUST 16, 1993
ZONING FILE #1852 - CONT.
. , • ^ thW u a 12 acre former dump site that was closed in the early ’70s. The
Mabusth explam^ ^ ^ cubic vards but fill was never received under the
City limitwi apptom s ^ jjj [o.ooo cubic yards and the conditional use
first pennit. The second pp received from Stubbs Bay
permit in effect cutrendy « for *0^^^ , recent lake
sewer project ^ Eisu-er is represented by Cliff Reep of GLContiactmg,
SrMrnSrwrenTrl^cuMc^y-ldageLuid be reached^
•III!Reep replied he is not sure when they wUl complete the total 20,
Mabusth suted that aU of the conditions of the original application wiU be held.
Peterson asked if he has always met every prior condiuon and if there were any problems.
Mabusth reported a recent problem a week ago regarding filling of tires but the matter was
cleared up.
Nolan asked why all the filling,
for use.
,t was moved by Peterson, secon.^ by f i^‘--™^trp ”r^t he^^“ueTt^'S fo«S
«- *•«
requirements. Ayes 4, nays 0.
(#12) #1845 ERNEST LEMMERMAN
JfT^oposed lot line rearrangement and lot area
VARIANCE - 10:02 TO 10:21 P.M.
Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Lemmerman were present.
MINITTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.NLMISSION MEETLNG '
HELD AUGUST 16, 1993
ZONING FILE #1845 - CONT.
Mabusth explained applicant seeks direction concerning approval of a^proposed lot ^
reaningement and variance for the development of a vacant lot. The access “
I nroDcrtv is on Wildhurst Trail. He has purchased tax forfeited property and has
^out 33,000 s f. S area. The proposed lot line re^gement will reduce tte vacant lot to
19.600 s.f. Mr. Utnmennan ’s homestead lot would be mcreased to 26.150 s.f.
^ i^rested. He has been there for 36 years and has cleared up that area. It has a nice vie^t
of Forest Lake.
Chair Schroeder asked if it is a buUdable lot.
Mabusth answered the lot needs variance approval as it is m a 1 acre zone. It is sewer
approved.
Volan asked whether it would be a benefit to realign the lot for better balance. Your waU is
only a couple of feet behind your garage. The line could actuaUy be moved ftirther down
balance.
Uinmennan said that would not be a problem and noted the hill being useless. He explained
several years ago the residence had burned down on the vacant land.
Chair Schroeder stated that the issue here would be a lot area variance.
J^d^tTiL^e wlw rm^"ts‘?0%Tf Sa^but he doesn’t meet 80%
for the required lot areas.
Lemmetman stated that he would have no problem dropping the lot line down.
Mabusth asked if memiKts TOO^SiS^rof
It was reviewed favorably in 1985 required airf members need only give
So‘n“rppSr^ U wlTa^o help m determine lot lines by examining a topographic
map but we do not have any topo information.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.\LMISSION MEETING
HELD AUGUST 16, 1993
ZONING FILE #1845 - CONT.
Peterson stated he had no problem with what Lemmerman is tr>'ing • do and it seems to fit into
the rest of the neighborhood. It is an unusual piece of property. He would like to lake a look
at the topography.
Lemmerman said he har been working with it since 1986 to make it a workable situation.
Mabusth relayed information that she received a phone call from a lady who was an interested
buyer..
Lemmerman stated he had not been contacted.
Peterson said he felt Lemmerman was on the right track and to keep working with her.
Schroeder said it makes sense and is consistent with the neighborhood.
(#2) #1848 CITY OF ORONO,
1940 SHORELINE DRIVE - 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 5 - MUSA BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
PUBLIC HEARING - 10:21 TO 10:32
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
Mabusth explained that both properties are outside the MUSA boundary lines. The septic system
at 1940 Shoreline Drive has a failing septic system. The applicant seeks approval of a
connection to an existing sewer line at the southwest comer. The property is approximately 2
acres in area. The adjacent property owner, Mr. Morse, and the railroad do not have a prc‘'lem
with the amendment as proposed.
Peterson commented that we should encourage these hookups to eliminate septic system.
Mabusth said they should be encouraged in the shoreland areas and this is a property that is
located within a 100’.
Callahan said you can’t be connected to the sewer unless you get the approval of Metropolitan
Council. The other connection involved here is the Melamed property so you are being asked
to approve those two MUSA lines.
PoMJii 60^0
r.J.b.
/
/.
tj^/^<rrrtc. y^-52. lx 7^^
V^-JT3 ^
To fAy Lof
V
>-e-K
II
r
»
r
«
f
I PRELIMINARY PLAT AND
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
^ ERNidT LEMMERMAN
... -4Q^;rONlCMnEllf GARDENS
[fTIO^A: f0,m n» #r
fjfti l•.ti..»t.Mr iO r.it jt rig«
rj? p«r>i .1 Kltli Mid do-tMMttriy IlM il tnU tfcwc. dortliwmrly to tho polot of Oogloo
i r>At a^ttmOE I:
Airat%Mft Of^t TOMKAJIM ffoI^UriiiWumrlJt“rwro;|‘S.nhJ.|t.f}y Mr.no. Wtj tM
is,2%lB:R.RrR"RR^Ks «j h s?.'tRM**s*f
IR iRi ^W^|tanntplf» County g RlARtfOti.
Ii•r'4MUt
• t Mrktr fouad
mi iMtrUiff tro upon on »iii»td ditoR#
' t ’ ’ *
>
■ v;.i
.*
*r
m»N o*«; fi«.«irT»oK
A
J
•
COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC
|'*2 I .ir.’.if .It t'Ui* ' I I".!
fti: r'^ mi
.ill \i\ ' -V
I hm-K trrt.lt tiul lh.t tunrt hj» I'crfMird K mr .w
«|»Mn «n<) lh*l I**4 dulyrr|ii*lnrdCu.llnjinrrf 4»tdUftJ^urtrttu under
Ihr Ut«' td ihr Suit .d MritncMHi
------------------------
Milts r.iv«avrK Mwtort.4j Lnentr SumSt U"
tCAlJ
P30*
D*n
I2I0-93
93-900
f
it «*
' a
ft . 4
• >
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission Members
Ron Mwrse. City Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
February 17, 1994
SUBJECT: #1905 Ken Hopkins/John Po%-ers, 75/85 Femdale Green - Subdivision of a
Lot Line Rearrangement (Class
Piertinent Ordinances
Chapter 1 1 - Class I Subdivision
Section 10.55. Subd. 15 (A-3)
Subdivision will result in the reduction of dry buildable land. Applicants propose crediting of
wetland area under this section of code as property is served with sewer allowing for credit of
wetland areas.
Existing Lot 2 = 3.13 acres (1.02 wet [.73 wetlands, .29 acres drainage easement))
Proposed Lot 2 - 2.02 acres (.73 acres wet)
Parcels A, B and C = total area l.ll acres (.29 acres wet)
Other pertinent information for this review:
Resolution #2970 final plat Fairway Hills Addition
Resolution #2927
Council Minutes 2/11/91
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Addendum
C - Plat Map
D - Property Owners List
E - Existing Properties
F - Proposed Subdivision
G - Resolution #2970 Approving Plat of Fairway Hills Addition
H - Resolution #2927
I - Council Minutes 2/11/92
J - Survey
Description of Request
Applicants propose the reconfiguration of the northern boundary of lx>t 2 so that northern
triangular piece of contiguous dry buildable land is divided and would be recombined with pre
existing residential lots (Lots 5, 6 and 7, Alio Terrace), review Exhibit J. Properties in Alio
r
Zoning File #1905
February 17, 1994
Page 2
Terrace are substandard in area and do not meet the required 1 acre minimum lot size. The
additional lands will improve lot area. Mr. Powers has assumed the resfwnsibility for dividing
the three parcels for future connection to his own homestead lot and to the two. northern
residential lots. Staff has been advised that Mr. and Mrs. Famand, the owners of Lot 5. wish
to acquire the additional area. Lot 6 is being offered for sale and it is the hope of applicant to
sell parcel to future land owner or maintain as part of Power's homestead.
Mr. Powers' attorney has been made aware that the Cit>- does not allow substatKiard lots to be
created without being legally combined to adjacent homesteads as Mr. Famand is not an active
participant in this application. If this subdivision is approved as proposed. Mr. Powers would
have to legally combine Parcels A. B and C with his homestead parcel Lot 7. The legal
combination of Parcel C w ith Ixit 5 could take place w ithout the resolve ot Parcel B. It would
be impossible for Parcel B to be combined w ith Lot 6 prior to the legal combinations of Parcel
C w ith Lot 5.
Section 10.55. Subd. 15 (A*3) would allow a property served by sewer to achieve credit for the
wet area as long as the wet areas do not exceed the dry buildable - dry 1.29, wet .73.
Please review Exhibits G. H and I. The intent of the City was to maintain above all the
standards of the RR-IB rural residential no matter if sewer was provided to the property. The
specific notice was set in place as Mr. Powers had expressed an interest in acquiring an
easement over the property to achieve access to the adjacent golf course. Planning Commission
members advised that such an easement would have to be excluded trom the dry buildable area
of Lot 2.
Issues for Consideration
1. Have the applicants provide adequate supportive information for Council to reconsider
its original ruling on the rural dry buildable in the subdivision of Fairway Hills Addition.'
2. Although the lot is oddly configured and contrived to satisfy the rural contiguous dry
buildable. would you recommend to the Council to reconsider based on the findings that
substandard Lots 5, 6 and 7 will be increased in area.
3. Would this area ever function as addition yard area for this addition property?
4. If you support the current lot line rearrangement application, how many parcels should
be created in the northern corridor? 1, 2 or 3 as proposed? Remember Parcel B could
not be sold to Lot 6 before Parcel A is sold to Lot 5 in the current three parcel
configuration.
Zoning File #1905
Februan’ 17. 1994
Page 3
Options of Action
To approve subdivision of lot liiK rearrangement being amended to include onl\ _2_ parcels
and that sketch of lot liiw rearrangement be amended per City’s standard boilerplate: or
Denial finding the lot line rearrangement to be in complete conflict with the directives and intent
of Resolutions #2927 and #2970.
r
1
ft
CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPUCATION
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 75 Femdale Green
ProjKrty Identification Number (P.I.D.) 36-118-23~^^-QQ2Q--------
Please check one - Property______abstract or —IL-----torrens?
Attach legal description to application.
APPUCANT; (Owner of Lot 7, Alio Rae Terrace)
Phone (home)
Name John L. Powers
Address «5 Femdale Greea City Wavzata
Phone (work) 347-7000
_____Zip 55391
OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home)
Name Kenneth R. and L. Hooldns—---------
Address 75 Femdale Green_______ City
Phone (work)
Zip 55391
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size 2.39
.73
3.12
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Present Use (check)Residential; no of units _Ji
Other (specify)_________
Present Zoning District RR-IB
PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes
Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites)
Subdivision for New Building Sites
pc
Number of Building Sites: no change
0 ___
no change.
Existing Units
New Units
Total Units
Proposed Gross Denuty: no change Units per Acres
Minimum Lot Size:N/A Sq. feet Dry Buildable Land
Proposed Use: (check)Residential
Other (specify)
PLEASE SEE ADDENDUM ATTACHED HERETO.
minimum material necessary for complete preliminary APPLICATION
1. Completed Application Form
2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey.
3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you must obtain this list from
4.
Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271)
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you
wish notified of this application.
Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete,
Zoning Official’s Signature Date
1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments).
2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat.
3. Title opinion.
4. Easements, Covenants, etc.
5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit.
Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete,
Zoning Official’s Signature Date
FEES
Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & HI)
XX Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement
$200.00
300.00
my
[•■•TttraTti
#rUt rtKvr*
irtniTt ■ilWO OI
•:^i
rt III r*:i ■ i ir^:^ ii 11 ii r^. i
nirtv^Tii isnnriiTiT*^
ififMArt
m ijaiCllUM TO SUBDIVISION APPLICATIQN
FOR PROPFltTY mCATED AT
75 FERNPALE GREEN
The property which is the subject of this Subdivision Application and which is legally
described on attached Exhibit A (the "Property") is irregularly shaped and includes a long
narrow strip on the north side that abuts, on the east, Lots S, 6 and 7, Alio Rae Terrace.
John and Roxanne Powers are the owners of Lot 7, AUo Rae Terrace. Patrick and Carolyn
Famand are the owners of Lot 5, Alio Rae Terrace.
The Owner of the Property would like to re-configure the northerly boundary of the Property
so as to eliminate the long narrow strip on the north side of the Property. The Owner would
like to divide said strip into three separate parcels, each of which would become a part of a
lot adjacent to it on the east. These propos^ parcels are designated as Parcels A, B, and C
on the attached survey. The balance of the Property following the proposed re-con figuration
of the northerly boundary is shown as Parcel D on the attached survey.
John and Roxanne Powers intend to acquire Parcels A, B and C. Patrick and Carolyn
Farnand have expressed a willingness to acquire Parcel C. At present, the owner of Lot 6,
AUo Rae Terrace, is not interested in acquiring Parcel B. John and Roxanne Powers have
agreed to acquire Parcels A and B with the intent that Parcel B may in the future be sold to a
successor owner of Lot 6, Alio Rae Terrace and Parcel C may be sold to Patrick and
Carolyn Farnand. (Unless and until such sales are made, John and Roxanne Powers wiU
own Parcels A, B and C.)
Lots 5, 6 and 7, Alio Rae Terrace, are currently zoned R1 A. The acquisition of Parcels A,
B and C by John and Roxanne Powers will not have an impact on the present use of Lots 5,
6 and 7, Alio Rae Terrace.
John Powers submitted the proposed legal descriptions for Parcels A, B, C and D to the
Hennepin County Platting and Survey Department. John Smith and Ron Odegaard of that
Department reviewed the legal descriptions and have determined that a registered land survey
will not be required in connection with the proposed subdivision.
ii
pr|
>im-
1^1
rI
r¥s*A!l
-r.
»■i ^ *fv,< ^
J '•■'1;ftiE-sa^^mri 'Si
('■’ ' ■'if■ -t.^ * ■■ ''■ .43’
j^r V 'j '»-^
mfe :immj
j
IP
k^-.
r •' ^
itW=»va/j4,.&HEM4CPIN. ^ i1 ywV MTHI'*'■ -rrtwl* iooli 00til*^^ NWTHCATf ROT««rs»NAMC/»^ ill M0RTH6ATE RO/*>’^'1“'''’ * ^V'W:!. > ■•'•T;-r.-*.•.' y .7 ^ r' *“k .fr 1^. MAYZATA HNV tf.S5SY1 i.mmn>i j^TAXRAVM
►lip
'M ii'CvKINNETH R • LINOA L
AV€ H
iHtkR>TH MM 55AA7
44 0020 GREENHOPKINS HOPKINS
. » .;. r* ''HYMom
\Jm^ '
CMttR NMk* :T L 1 N j LAPtifKC
,-.,iTAXPAYfll\V^f»TtMOTMY L A NANCY J tAPERRE
i^^iW0€/ADft* *‘iS «*N0**-EmT- '‘“’“I* *.
L.i
V
■mh PI •
COUNTY property INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ■=ratt-AREPORT NO. P-----SS S4-118-25 4* 0018 00058 ADDRESS UNASS1GAR0 NORTHGATE THO HOMEOWNERS NORTHGATE TWO H0«0HNERS UNKNOFM •A 5?# i;58 54-118-25 .44 0018 00045 FERNOALl GREEN T L A N J LAPERRE ' ■TIMOTHY L 4 NANCY J LAPERRE V 45 FERNOALE GREEN HAY2ATA MN 55541 WiV' YftS '*58 54-118-25 44 002100058 ADDRESS PENDING T L i N J Li».>ERRE TIMOTHY L 4 NANCY J LAPERRE 45 FEWIDALE GREEN
WAYZATA W 55581
58 54-118-25 44 0022i^: *£|M00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO «HAYZATA country cub >■ TV jShayzata country cub * «80X 151
NAVZATA »< SS581
• •
>4?".-P *Mi J '• vt !r ‘.r >*.
< •• i.-' *.■'■' 'h^'*:'-k'
'i • *8 ^ 1. ■ ,V'
88 0i-Ut-2S 12 0001
00200 NAYZATA 8LV0 W
MAYZATA COUNTRY CUB
NAYZATA COlWTRY CUB
80X 151
hayzata Ifl 55581
H'^akiiS!
TOTAL 8ATCH
• V
m'ooozi
.4: ■>,
.c- ^ . , ■« '•
1
m-'wt
iil4
. t
)pm
,' •
w
'••■ • ^
Ilf -n
if ^1 i;
■ ’«
'•/ 1- i ■ l''
irnMm:■iPl-
1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN 2?biicoRIl4'^3^
representation OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON ^<E JECORW
OF THE HEftiEPIN COUNTY DEPARTFJENTyDF PROPEIjyr^AXATlW, ^
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
re^
m
DATI 7/
Ifl-
ii !• ^
.-i
ill
1}A 'V ♦^ .w
vt
V , < '
• ■ \ ^
. ^4.* * I %' .•
4
P
i*If
.-•**
______/t----
• .*
I
\
\
•• «,
\
1 t o o
* -
\ \
\
%CSH0#^
CITYof ORONO
IRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ^^-0
A RBSOLOTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP
FAXRHAT HILLS ADDITION
PILE NO. 1615
tfHEREASr the City of Orono is a nunicipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has
adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and
safe development of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the
application for a subdivision of a two lot plat by Kenneth R.
Hopkins and Gary D. Mroz, hereinafter "the subdividers"; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all
standards of the RR-IB rural residential zoning district finding
that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its
use as a single family residence to be fully developed without
the need of any variances; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the property has been assessed a
sewer and water unit, the City Council approved sewer and water
services to both Lots 1 and 2, although both lots meet the
required rural standards for residential development; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements
of the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution #2927.
2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road
shown as State Highway Ho. 12.
3. Creation of a new private driveway shown on the plat as
Outlet A.
4. Concurrent with the creation of this private driveway,
the subdividers have dedicated to the City utilities and
access easements granting to the City permanent access,
improvement and utility easements over said outlot; the
subdividers have created a declaration of certain
maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or
benefitting lot o%mers covenants and agrees to permanently
maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private
driveway.
Page 1 of 3
(5
r
O O
^ ^ » I « mm
>•
CITYof ORON
by the Wayzata Country Club.
6. Dedication to the City of Flowage and
Easements providing for limitations on the use
and drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as
drainage easements.
7. Ei-7cution of a subdivid.rs' aqreenent ’=^5
installation of certain credit-subdivision approval and the posting of a letter of credit
at 150% of actual cost of required improvements.
8. Payment to the City of a Parle Dedication Fee in the
amount of $10r200.00.
9. Pavment to the City for the legal review and ot
the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Fairway
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following
condition:
1. Permits for residential construction on both Lots 1 and
2 shall be issued by the City of Orono. Sewer and water
permits shall be issued by the City for both Lots ^
The billing for sewer and water usage shall be the
responsibility of the City of Orono. Lot 2 has received
credi? of the previously assessed water and sewer unit
charges againthe property. Based on
scheduled, a sewer connection charge for Lot 1 is $7,22 .
and a water connection charge is $3,531.18.
2 Building permits will not be Issued for new construction
until utilities are installed and the access road has been
approved by the City Engineer for safe use by municipal
inspection vehicles•
3 Final utility and road construction plans must be
approved by the City prior to installation.
4. The subdividers and future owners are hereby advised
j»nv aranting of access easements involving Lot 2 may
decrease the two^acres in area of dry contiguous lands and
that the existing standards of the RR-IB zoning district
shall be effective even though municipal service has been
provided to Lot 2.
Page 2 of 3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ^
o
r .*>-...
► ; <r-
CITY of ORONO
RESOIJTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.w970
5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of °
with either the Hennepin County Recorder's
Registrar of Titles office on or before December 10, i - ^ JL
together with a certified original copy of this Reso
and executed copies of the easements and covenants no e
above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if
the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that
event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the
City of Orono for subdivision review.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on
this 10th day of June, 1991.
ATTEST:
Haliin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on
of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument
was executed on behalf of the City*
USDA S. VEg^,
mOTAHY PUSUC • MIWNfSOTAcautrn^
y ' I
Notary Public
Page 3 of 3
I
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2921_
A RSOLOnON GRANTING___
PRSLZMJNART APPROVAL OF THE
PLAT OF FAIRNAT BILLS ADDITION
FILE NO. 1615
ffHEREAS, Kenneth R. Hopkins and
(hereinafter "the applicants") on December 28, 1990 filed a
formal subdivision application with the City
two lot residential plat of property legally described in Exhibit
A, attached (hereinafter "the property") and;
NHEREASr after due published and mailed notice in
accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City
of Orono Zoninc and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Coiraission
held a public hearing on January 22, 1991 at which time all
persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were
oiven the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on February 11,
1991 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision
application of the applicants, noting the following findings of
fact:
1, The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family
Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2
acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly
created lot.
2. The property contains a total of approximately 26.3
acres. All of the proposed residential lots meet the
required 2 acre dry contiguous land area, as follows*
Lot 1 " 2 acres
Lot 2 ■ 2.11 acres (1.08 wetlands)
Outlet A » 1.01 acres (.75 dry; .26 wet)
Outlet B « 20.1 acres
3 Portions of Lot 2 have been assessed a sewer and water
unit and shall be served by municipal services yet retain
current rural standards for development.
Page 1 of 5
/
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2927 --------
4. Lot 1 has been found to
on-site sewage treatment facilities to se.ve c
future needs.
5. Lots 1 «nd 2 have been found to satisfy all rural
Standards of the RR-IB zoning district.
6. outlet A has been created
and eastern portion of Lot 2.
7. outlet B has been created to f
of the property for a„d serves as open space
"areIs‘%“o=n\TsVin^g%f tlVUenra^e’a of the golf course.
HOW, therefore BE IT RESOLVED that based^ upo^ or
more of the findings noted Jof Fairway Hills
Orono hereby approves 1990, revised January
Addition per the survey ^ ^ot Surveys Company, Inc.,
^^d aVp^ov^e^s t"hTerttnVior^/n^n?=ipal water and sewer to Lot 1,
subject to the following conditions.
. r 1 and driveway within Outlot
i‘ '^^l”^b\^"suMect to ^ set forth in the
reso'lltion approving a‘°conditional use permit and variance
for all land alterations.
2 Building permits for residential construction °n both
r. 2 shall o.ssued by the City of Orono. SewerLots 1 and 2 snail issued bv the City of Orono forand water Pe^^Jbs ^^all b water usage
!Sril^fe%he‘«spons?bility o7the City of Orono. Based on
tSe 1991 fee schedule, sewer connection charge for Lot 1
$7?224.57 and a water connection charge is $3,531.18.
Page 2 of 5
//V
liW
• V
,v
;7
CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
wn 2927
3. Building permits will not be issued 'frfties'are
until the plat is granted *^2*has^been*app*roved by the City
installed and the access road j'fP^tion vehicles.
??nnru^^!rtilt^^anU^n^d
?feVo^'s e% Y'my;ofem=eYfsY\°ee-rncl^o%”ld°^0^
Agreement).
4. Applicants are hereby advised^that^anyjra^
service has been provided to both Lots 1 and 2.
FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS
The following list of final submittals mu_st
^c\%dYl"eYlouYcYl"mYe:tng"on"tSe“sVcondYnd fourth Mondays of the
month:
s°s, ■”,“■“.'5 s
14^ 1990f revieSed January ^2# 1991e
b' Dedication of "drainage and utility
wide along all perimeter property lines and 5 each
side of internal property lines.
c) Designation and dedication of a drainage easement
over wetlands and drainageways within Outlot A and Lot
2.
d) Designation of Outlets A and B per plat drawings.
Page 3 of 5
i
•1/}
. ■ }
/
•V
.1
!/0 K O w
fi^s-% i
4«o^
CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.2927
LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title ooinion addressed to the City. owners^
mortgage holders or others with property interest
indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other
documents affected by such interest.
b) The applicants must provide certified copies of all
recorded easements currently affecting the property.
c) Signed and executed Flowage & Conservation Easement
over the wetlands/drainageways within Outlot A and Lot
2, Please review sample drainage easement enclosed
herewith. Please make necessary amendments to include
shared driveway to be installed and maintained within
designated wetland.
d) Signed and executed developers' agreement and letter
of credit for installation of sewer and water
improvements and private driveway. Applicant to
provide letter of credit at 150% of actual cost of
improvements .
e) Signed and executed Access and Utilities Easement
over Outlot A. If shared sewer and water lines extend
beyond boundaries of Outlot A» legal description must
be expanded to include this area.
f ) Copy of private covenants to cover
ownership/maintenance of road and culverts and yard
areas within Outlot A. Applicants may wish to expand
to maintenance of dry land areas of Lot 2 along east
boundaries.
FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $300 .00*
* a) Park dedication - Park Commission will accept park
fee in lieu of lands. Rolf Erickson, City Assessor,
has been asked to determine the fair market value of
the lands inclusive of Lots 1 and 2 and Outlot A.
Applicants to be advised as soon as Mr. Erickson has
submitted his findings.
Page 4 of 5
Exhibit A
resolution *^29 2 7
Property Description
PARCEL 1 (P.I.N. 01-117-23-11-0001)
That part of Lot 58, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 184, Hennepin
County, Minnesota lying north of New State Highway o.
PARCEL 2 (P.I.N. 36-118-23-44-0013)
The south 52.00 feet of Lot 9, Blook 1, ALLO-sp TERRACE, except
that part thereof taken for New State Highway No. 1^.
PARCEL 3 (P.I.N. 36-118-23-44-0012)
Lot 8, Block 1, ALLO-RAE TERRACE
PARCEL 4 (P.I.N. 36-118-23-44-0001)
r.f East ■* /2 of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36,
North, Ra'nge 23 West lying South
No 12.
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1991
ZONING FILE #1613-JENSEN HOMES CONTINUED
A motion was made by Callahan, seconaed
Resolution #2926, granting a Conditional nassed
rental guest apartment. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed.
11615 GARY MROZ ft KEN HOPKINS, 59 FERNDALE GREEN
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2927
AND
#1616 GARY MROZ ft KEN HOPKINS, 59 FERNDALE GREEN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION #2928
Mr. Gary Mroz was present.
Bernhardson reviewed the information
Mabusth in her January 15, 1991 memo. He saia Served li?h
wayzata does not object to this property
munic’oal water and sewer. The lot to the south has been tested
“and could accommodate a primary and alternate
-'oncern was raised regarding the control of weeds on t^
Properties near Ferndale Green. It would be the
of t.he owners of the two lots, or the owner of the Outlet, to
maintain the easterly portion of lots. Both
acre minimum. There is also some concern about developing this
orooerty in light of the future Highway 12 corridor. It was telt
?hat such an issue should be left to the individual property
owners."
With regard to the Conditional Use Permit to cross a
wetlands, Bernhardson said, “Appropriate modifications will be
made to the wetlands and the drainage occurring through a culvert
system, so not to impede the storm water ponding.
Mabusth adaed that the private drive that will serve this
orope^tv has been pushed to the north side of the out..ot. She
Lid “This was done to allow flowage from the low lying
JLL of lot to the east to flow without restriction to the
Lainaqeway to the culverts. Mr. Anderson, the Engineer, has met
on SLte with the property owner to the east. The revrsions are
reflected in the most recent plan, which the City is
recommending.“
Bernhardson noted that the Planning Commission had voted
unanimously in favor of recommending approval, but took no
position on the sewer and water issue for Lot 1.
Callahan asked Mabusth to elaborate on the situation that
would exist between the property owners and the Wayzata Country
Club.
Mabusth stated that early on in this process she was
contacted by an attorney representing an adjacent property owner.
- 13 -
. r' •
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1991
ZONING FILE #1615 A |1616-MROZ/HOPKINS CONTINUED
She said, "There is no legal easement granting access for the
adjacent property owners to the Golf Course. I would refer to
Mr. Mroz for any information he may have in this respect. I
explained to the Attorney that the City must be assured that two
acres of dry contiguous land is maintained. With the exclusion
of the wetland, and the areas of the 30 foot and 15 foot drainage
easements, the dry contiguous is reduced to 2.11 acres. I
advised the Attorney that any access easement that is created
over that portion of property ma* reduce that area below the
required two acre minimum."
Mr. Mroz said, "The property owner in question is John
Powers. He had approached us about purchasing the portion of our
property that is located behind his house. We informed him we
could not sell any portion of the property. Mr. Powers asked us
if we would allow the Club to continue maintaining any portion of
that property that is not used by the new homeowner. We informed
Mr. Powers that we would agree to such an arrangement. I do not
believe we can legally grant an access easement."
Callahan asked whether the access would continue to be used.
Mr. Mroz replied, "It would depend on who owns the property.
I would imagine it may be used by the adjacent property owners."
Jabbour asked if the City would be notified by the County if
the property owners filed an access easement after the
subdivision is completed.
Mabusth stated that the County would more than likely nofc
provide any notification to the City of such an easement being
filed.
Barrett stated that the property owners could file such an
easement. He said, "If an easement were filed and came to the
City's attention, the City could treat it as a violation of our
Subdivision Ordinance. Secondly, the City is putting the
on notice that, if the easement decreases the lot
size, it cannot be developed. That is the practical leverage
that the City has to prevent unwanted easements."
Callahan suggested that such language be included in the
resolution.
Goetten stated that she would grant the property owners
access to sewer and water because Ferndale Green has sewer and
water and the lots do meet the two acre minimum.
Bernhardson suggested further amending the resolution to
also place the property owners on notice that the provision of
municipal water and sewer does not entail a potential reduction
- 14 -
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY IL, 1991
ZONING FILE #1615 & #1616“MR02/HOPKINS CONTINUED
in the Trfo-acre Zoninc in the future.
Mabusth stated that the City of Wayzata has agreed to ailo-
the City of Orono to initiate and handle the issuance of ail
perniits. She said, "Billing will occur through the City of Orono
and wa will aake any refunds dee.ned necessary to the City ot
Wayzata."
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt
Resolution #2927, granting Preliminary approval of the Plat ot
Fairway Hills Addition, as amended to include notification to the
orooerty owner of Lot 2, that the granting of any access easement
zo the Wayzata Golf Course may decrease the lot sire below the
required two acre minimum; and that both owners of be place.* on
notice that the provision of .nunicipai water and sewer wi^l not
entail a reduction in the Two-acre Zoning in the future. Motion,
Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt
Resolution 12928, granting a Conditional Use Permit and Variance
to cross a wetland' for access purposes. Motion. Ayes-4, Nays-0.
Motion passed.
MAUREEN STEELE-BELLOWS, 265 BROWN ROAD SOOTH
RESOLUTION #2929*
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to
adopt Resolution #29*29, amending Resolution #2877 that amended
Condition of Approval of the Byfield ?iat. Motion, Ayes-4^
Nays-0. Motion passed.
ENGINEER'S REPORT:
PAY REQUEST #4 - LIFT STATION |8*
It was moved bv Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to
approve the fourth and final Pay Request to Northwest Mechanical
in the amount of $2,400.00, for wor'-c done to Lii.t Station 48.
Motion, Ayes-4. Nays-0. Motion passed.
PAY REQUEST #8 - WELL #3*
It was moved bv Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to
approve the eighth and final Pay Request to Keys Weil Drilling •
Company in the amount of 510,351.95, for work done to Well #3.
Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed.
CHANGE ORDER #1 - LIFT STATION #10 AND #43
Mayor Peterson removed this item from the Consent Agenda.
She asked why the City Engineer had not taken into consideration
the eventual return of the water table to a normal level.
Cook explained, "With a project such as this, we consider
only the existing conditions, not what may occur in the future.
- 15 -
t.
!
1
TO:plannin g Commission Members
Ron Moorsc. Cit>' Administrator
3
FKOM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zomng Administrator
DATE:Februarv 15. 1994
SUBJECT: #1897 R. Hunt Greene/Jane Piccard, 865 Partenwood Road - Variances
Continuation of Public Hearing
Review of Amended Plan
Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (A) • Lakeshorc setback variance
A.Maxwell Bay
Allowed = 0
Existing => 69’
Proposed = 52’
B Channel
Allowed = 0
Existing » 46’
Proposed = 39’ (Setback approved in ’83 variance,
also approved by DNR, review Exhibit D)
Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover
0-75’ setback area = 46,000
Allowed = 0
Existing = 4,497 s.f. or 9.11%
Proposed = 5,040 s.f. or 10.9% (4,972 s.f. + 68 s.f. of new driveway
hardcover)
Alternative plan = 4,740 s.f. or 10.3% (Applicant would remove the
300 s.f. if backout apron was eliminated)
List of Exhibits
A - Applicants ’ Addendem
B - Hardship Statement from Original Application Submittals
C - Topo Maps of 1972
D - DNR Letter 1/12/94
E - Original Plan
F - Amended Plan
Zoning File #1897
Febfuar> 15. 1994
Pace 2
Review of Amended Application
Applicants have submitted a revised plan with exact location of 929.4 elevation at Maxwell Bay.
Note setback from Maxwell Bay shoreline for addition is now shown at 52*. As long as a 50*
minimum setback is maintained, the DNH woulu take no issue w ith the 52’ setback. Applicants
note the addition has been reduced in square footage proposed at 650 s f. (original 760 s.f.).
Applicants note that the size of the garage addition is a standard size for a two stall garage with
additional storage (24’ x 26’ = 624 s.f.).
There is a reduction of 107 s.f. of driveway hardcover (175 s.f. - 68 s.f. of new- drive, see
Exhibit F) resulting from drivew'ay area to be removed and driveway area to be covered by
portion of new structure. Applicants have offered to remove 300 s.f. of backout apron. Staff
once again would ask that a backout apron be provided because of the length of the single
driveway.
Applicants are willing to remove overhangs along the side of the structure facing the channel so
that there is ik) further encroachment of the substandard yard area and would agree to limit
overhang to 1 1/2’ along the side and front of garage. If maintained at 1 1/2’, there would be
no impact on hardcover or structural coverage. A normal lot with 46.000 s.f. would be allowed
6.900 s.f. or 15% structural coverage. Total improvement would result in 2.447 s.f. or 5.3%
structural coverage.
Issues for Consideration
1. Is the reduction of garage addition adequate? Original 760 s.f. Proposed 650 s.f.
2. Should the struemre be reduced in length to minimize encroachment of Maxwell Bay
shoreline now shown at a 52’ setback. Note a 65’ setback was approved in 1983
variance review. Review Exhibit C. this may have resulted from faulty topographic
information.
3.Is a 1.13% increase in hardcover too excessive for this propert)' now proposed at 10.9fS?
Structural coverage is proposed at 5.3%
Options of Action
Approval as propiosed or amended.
Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover scheduled for
removal must be completed prior to the final inspection for the new construction.
r
R9spons9 Planning Coaad.ssion c
l/18/94-il897 Graana/Piccard
ntm
1) A new survey was completed as requested. The new survey
includes a square foot reduction in the proposed addition and
indicates that the requested net additional hardcover has been
reduced to 475 square feet (see 4 below). The total requested
hardcover is now 4972 square feet. When we moved into this home
in 1986 the hardcover totalled 5065 square feet. As part of the
prior 1986 variance the hardcover was reduced by me to the
current 4497 square feet. This request in combination with the
1986 worlc results in a total hardcover reduction of 93 square
feet (see summary below).
2) Overhangs-The house was designed by John Howe, the chief
draftsperson for Frank Lloyd Wright. I have been advised that any
adjustments that are made to the overhang amount will be
distinctly noticeable and substantially impair the architectural
integrity and importance of the home. Nevertheless, I believe
that overhangs in the back beyond standard are not required,
and I believe that the front overhangs can be shortened by at
least six inches if the city so desires.
3) Two car vs. three car-The new garage as proposed requires
exactly the same hardcover as the standard two car garage
proposed and approved in the 1983 variance application. The space
for the third car is obtained by squeezing the standard spacing
and shifting all of the normal side storage area to the side
closest to the house. As such, the space for the third car is
substantially substandard and I believe the city could properly
consider the proposal a two car garage with storage area on the
side. This was designed and proposed this way in deference to the
city's hardcover concerns. In addition, we have now further
reduced the square footage of the garage by shortening the corner
closest to the channel.
4) Alternative reduction of hardcover-We originally discussed with
the staff the elimination of the turnaround area that exists in
the current driveway. If required, we would be willing to remove
this area marked with an "A”. This would reduce the hardcover by
300 square feet. As such, the total additional net hardcover
requested would be only 175 square feet or 0.4%.
Summary of Hardcovor (squara faet)
Existina-1986 Sxistina-1994 ProDosed Alternate
House 1115 1347 1997
Decks 450 450 450 450
Walkways 75 75 75 75
Driveway 3425 2625 2450 2150
TOTAL JWf 4972 wn
1
//
0 »
77 a
hardship/description of unusual property conditions
This property has been an exception from the start. The
property owners a^d'the proposed construction
«5id^ a hill makinq it invisible to any adjacent property
owners. The difficulties of this PfIfal^iched previously by tne city and a copy of a 1986 variance is attacnea
detaili.ng many va"iance*when it required 5641 square?reroriLIcov^fin'’iL''!:7l"fonr"we ave^worhedw city
to brina the current figure down to 4557 square feet. __
variance request will raise t.he hardcover to only 4927 square
feet bv takinq out driveway space.
tL original home and this proposed addition were both
designed by the nationally recognized architect, doh" P°“®'
the Prairie School. The addition will f’-«.9-acefully into the
present home and landscape and create an .f’^F^^rin itssire within Orono. The home is on one of the largest lots in its
neighborhood yet is one of the ^nallest houses in terms of square
footage. In addition, the house has .no basement and
limited storage area. The conversion of the two
living space and addition of a 2 to 3 car garage will Sc . ,.
the house small relative to its comparaole neighbors. We belie
the allowance of the use of our lot as a hcmesite originally
recognized tL lo^s peculiarity and the city-s desire to allow
some^flexibility in its use due to the hardship imposed. e
appreciate this effort by the city.
r
Certifieste of Sur^'ey;
I hereby certifv hhut thl:« Is a and ecrrwnt rermoentitior. cf h s\:rv>^y of
the^bo^jrularies of let 1, flock ?,--Vr.wcod. I‘. icca r.ct piircort tc 3^nw irprove
oenta or *‘r.ercschr>'r.cj-^s indl' ot-? rrr-rr«d lcca*;‘cr. cf n or^'rooed
buildinc. Existlnf: contour lines shown are froa torocraohic survey of July 12,
1971.
Scale;
Date :
o :
1- = fC
4-14-72
Iron marker
Gordon R. Coffin ’ Reg/JJJfi. 6064
Land Curveyor nnd Planner •
Long Lake, Minnesota
I
\
\
I-
STATE Of^.DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MCTRO waters - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106^^^
phonemo. 772-7910
i
January 12, 1994
Jeanne Mabusth
City of Orono
p.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
(27-133, #24),LAND USE APPLICATION #1897, LAKE MINNETONKA
CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Ms. Mabusth;
January 18, 1997.
,1B.7 R H.-- oroor, i Jane E. Piccard, 865 partepwQod Ro.ad^ The
IpDllcants^request lakeshore setback and hardcover variances in
o?der tS constmct a garage. DNl. Metro Waters recommends that the
city deny the variance requests as they are currently propos.
tn-rerw-U-hTs
level of protection.
and we would not object it the city approved the variance.
The Department should be advised of the action taken
re^esIS within 10 days of final =°P/ f
record should be forwarded to this office if the proposal is not
as discuss'd above, before it is approved. Please
conJfrt me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding
these comments.
Sincerely,
Ceil Strauss
Area Hydrologist
c: Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist
Lake Minnetonka file #24 aJAN. 1 5 1994
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
i ^
p>*r:.yy •/,-
.'’r
o ^ -JO •
'oi^/,/.h.
f% >
/f'^^ot:»» I*.
. #.
-Q^
(Cr^
Orono Planning Commission Members
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembcrs
Ron Moorse. City Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator
February 17, 1994
#1901 Tandem Properties. 2645.3025 Watertown Road • Preliminary Subdivision
- Continuation of Public Hearing
List of Exhibits
A - Planning Commission Action Notice 1/28/94
B - Richard LaGarde Ixnter
Richard Putnam Transmittal to MCWD
8420-0520. 0530. 0540. Sequencing, Replacement Plan, Evaluation Criteria
E - Wetland Mitigation Summary by Mark Gronberg
F - Wetland Maps by Svoboda
G - Survey/Topographic Map of Dougan Property (White Oak)
H - White Oak Circle Drainage Plan
I - Staff Memo 1/14/94
J - Topo Maps of Luce Line Area
K - DNR Letter Received 2/17/94
L - Amended Preliminary Plan
Status of Application
The application was tabled at the Planning Commission’s January meeting pending
resolve of downstream drainage concerns, adequacy of culverts under Luce Line, impact of
increased runoff from development on ponding areas adjacent to Luce Line and conceptual
acceptance of mitigation plan by Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnct.
Staff has been in contact with all icviewing agencies and has received concepnial
direction from both the Corps of Engineers and MCWD. The DNR. after a four-hour meeting
with applicant and staff, have approved the drainage plans and have agieed to culvert
replacement and alteration of the trail to make the stormwater controls work (review Exhibit ).
Please review E.xhibit J, the topographic maps of Luce Line area. The southeast culv^
(18") of the Coffin property will be replaced. The DNR has agreed to allow the trail to be
lowered approximatelv 1’ allowing for an emergency overflow to assure residents on nonh side
of Luce Line will not be flooded. The DNR has asked that direct drainage to ditch along north
side of Luce Line on Coffin property be minimized as much as possible because of the inability
to widen and deepen ditches because of the steep elevations adjacent to trail. The DNR has been
convinced that we are dealing with a very small watershed. Drainage currently exits property
at 18 CFS and will be reduced to 1 CFS.
The DNR seemed less concerned with the detention pond in the southwest corner of the
Dickey property. Runoff currently exits property at about a 117 CFS and alter development wi^
exit at 84 CFS. Drainage will follow along an existing drainage path to die southwest ana
on
f tlie
will
and
Zoning File #1901
February 17, 1994
Paue 2
evenoany .0 36'. 75' .on, cuUcn t^neaU. Luc. Li™. No changes a. proposed .n Urn
drainage system.
4 fh^ Hriinai?e comins from the rK^rtheasi along Willow Dnve
The DNR is “■ „ * we Line Refer lo vour iopos again. Drainage from
into an existing ^nd atea arain through culvert at extreme east,
the northeast will not dram P' j^»ention pond 4t the northeast corner ot propen>
DeveloiKt shall Countryside neighhorhood.
to minimize any impact on exntmg
in conversations wtth Joe . anta at the ^dav review*' ll'e
permit review at most would in the proposed mittgatton plan that a
Toted that if the engineer this ease; stntple letter could be sent
more abbreviated review wou.d be ,^5, ,ha„ three actes^
out within the next week He individual permit review that could
of disturbed area, >'’•= P'.'*" " edihat most individual permits were taktng a
result in as much as 120 day J'''''*' j, ,gview plans and additional submittals are sent
minimum of 120 Os Wildlife Service. DNR. State Historical Society and
to five reviewing agencies - me
EPA in Chicago.
.• u M n,.h4hii Creek Watershed Disinci has advised that with some
Ellen Sones of the Mmnehah anolicant will satisfv evaluation ciiiena tor
tweeking of the current mitigativin p an tot PP ^ ^ 30 jay
replacement plans as set forth in the S . q giurd Bulletin. .Mter the 30 day
period for publication of P'™'^'™™ht to the Minixthaha Creek Watershed Board for
period wait, the application can t - nation plan and the stormwater control.
toir regular monthly meeting ^ ^ Waiersfied District will probably be some lime
The earliest possible petratt approval trom the vvaivrsne
in April of this year.
Review E,xhibit B. Mr. “T'iTnTe Di^^^ He states
historical significance in the ‘ ^ .piritual/culmral significance and should
that spirinial leaders all believe tonhe sue J P through the Mn/DOT
roT^nVlotsC —council sometime ,n ..pnRMay 1994.
Please review Exhibit 1. placing ap^icant
of .in aonroval recommendation. Staff would ask tna council of Orono
on notiL tot final approval of the ''■’««'« condition would also
until all reviewing agencies have ‘•“"’P'«“ P^^^ installation of new culverts and alieraiion
approval.
• /f
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crxstal Bay, .MN 55323
473-7357
TO: Mr. Richard Putnam
Tamlem Properties
2765 Casco Point Road
Wavzata. MN 55391
zonlm ; kilk #1901
NOTICE OF PLANMNC, COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: Januar>f 28. 1994
COPIES: Mr. James Deanovic
Tandem Properties
2765 Ca.sco Point Road
Wavzata. MN 55391
TY'PE OF APPLICATION: Preliminarv' Subdivision
DATE OF MEETLNG: 01/18/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST
Tte Planning Commission recommended tabling the application until the following issues
are resolved:
1. Impact on dowristream drainage areas.
2. Resolve of DNR’s concerns regarding adequacy of culvens under Luce Line to
handle increased runotl. DNR also questioned use of old railroad bed of Luce
Lirw functioning as dam and potential impact on existing detention areas adjacent
to trail. Mark Gronberg has sent drainage study to the DNR as requested.
Representatives of the DNR have also expressed concern with increased drainage
flowing into park area to the south of the Dickey property.
Staff plans to meet with DNR representatives to review the findings of their
hydrologist and their final recommendation concerning stormwater
treatment/management plan.
3. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, local governmental unit responsible for
implementing Wetlands Conservation Act. to provide direction to City ccncerrdng
proposed plan tor mitigation of Type 1 wetlands to be filled. If stormwater
detention areas arc not to be considered appropriate mitigation area, then
applicants will be required to provide additional mitigation areas exclusive of
detention ponds.
General Comments on Subdivision
The On-Site Septic Manager will work with surveyor/engineer to resolve separation
setback ot five septic test areas and elevation of 100 year flood plain. The remaining lots of the
tirst phase have been found to have suitable area for on-site septic development. The Planning
Commission will recommend that Countryside Drive, a public road, remain as two cul-de-sac
roads. Property owners are to continue private maintenance of Countryside Drive until roadway
is a connected through road. All other cul-de-sac roads shall remain private. Back lot
configurations were approved on Coffin site. Surveyor shall amend preliminary plan to conform
to required building envelope for back lots. The Planning Commission approved the
encroachment of the 26' required setback from designated wetlands for the land alteratioas
Planning Commission Action Notice
Januar> 28. 1994
Page 2
adjacent to detention pond in Lot 1. Block 1 of Coffm property ^n^t asked that cither cul-de-sac
be relocatol or elevations lowered so that setback is met for cul-dc-sac of southern roadway in
Coffin propert>'.
The developer shall be expected to install bike trail along \xesl side of Dickey property.
Staff wx>uld urge Council to desigrute interior trails within subdivision as public. The City shall
provide further direction regarding adjustments of park dedication fee to reflect cost of
developer's installation of bike trail along east side of Old Crystal Bay Road and lands dedicated
for interior trails if approved as public. The surveyor is asked to adjust lot width for Lot 3,
Block 1 on the Dickey property so that it meets the required 200’ at the 50’ street setback
Applicant is once again advised that per Council’s directive, ail mitigation issues must
be resolved before Council will consider preliminarv subdivision. It will be important that
applicant and applicant ’s consultants work closely with the Watershed District, the Corps of
Engineers and the Department of Natural Resources to assure that all unanswered questions or
outstanding issues are resolved by the Planning Commission meeting of February 22nd.
Deadline for the receipt of ail new information and exhibits is Monday, February 14th before
noon.
Please contact the Orono staff if we can be of any assistance in meeting this deadline.
Failure to address these agencies ’ concerns will only result in further delay for applicant.
«
While Earth Land Recovery Project
B 1
If
Box 327
White E»1h
Phone: (218)473^110
F4X: (218)473^178
January 24, 1994
^ t •
Pat Dickey
2645 Watertown Rd
Long Lake, MN 5S35(
Dear Pat.
• f \
In regards to the area on your property which appears to have a
lot of Cultural significance ttf Native Americans, I would like to
thank you for your effort to preserve and protect this site.
w’
In,recent months Indigenous tribal people have been addressing
issues regarding Sacred Sites, Historical Sites. Hearings for
possible ammendments to the Nebonal Historic Preservation Act
have been held throughout the United States. Testimony from
traditional practitioners. Eiders, Tribal Historiens throughout the US
have echoed the same concern, that is, our language, Burial Grounds,
sites that have Religious Spiritual significance, (fasting sites,
ceremonial sites must be included and protected the same as
historic buildings, battlegrounds etc.), also access to such sites
must be maintained for tribal members.
Currently possibe amendments to the Indian Religious Freedom
Act reflect these concerns.
Having coordinated ceremonies with spiritual leaders,
(Medicine Men) on your property, it is our belief the site has alot of
Spiritual Cultural significance and should be preserved and
protected.
If you should have further questions, please feel free to call.
FEB 7 1994
Megwetch,
(Thank You)
Richard LaGarde
Community Organizer
I
I
W-
»'
,1
r
Ms. Qlcn Soncs
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)
14600 Minnetonka Rlvd.
Minnetonka, MN 55345-1597
He: Dickey/Coffm Permit Application Orono, MN
Dear Ms. Sones,
To assist in MCWD review of our Orono development we are providing
additional information requested in the new regulations for S42Q.QS20
nenclng and 8420.0530 Replacement Plan Components.
Sequencing
The developer hired Franklin J. Svoboda <Sr Assoc, to prepare a "Wetland
Classification Identification and Delineation Project No. 93-005, Oct. 29,
1993"
As part of this report and investigative process the consultant asked all
agencies, iind governmental units dealing with the project to meet out on
the site and discuss the standards to be used in developing the site. MCWD
staff attended these meetings and understand the problems with many of
the sites Wpe 1 and II wetlands.
As the Svoboda report states on pages 10 and 11;
"Many of the wetlands on the property have been significantly
impacted by agricultural activities. All or significant portions of
wetlands la, lb, Ic. 2a. 6a, 6b, 7b, 8b, 8d ;uid 1 lb are toeing farmed
currently or have been farmed in tiie recent past. In addition.
basins. 12. 13 & 14 are within areas currently being pastured by
livestock. In all cases, wetland functions are significant!)' degraded
for biological diversity, w-ild life use. water qualit\', aesthetic and
recreational v;iiue."
The site visits and meetings with Uie governmental and regulatory
represeniaUves provided us with very good direction in wa\ s to develop
the Orono sites. '
1. Since many of the type I and II wetlands were isolated, small,
poorly drained farm fields or pasture areas, combining these lu-eas
into a larger more diversified wetland ssould be beneficial.
2. Protect and enhance the quality type 111 wetlands on the site.
3 integrate the site drainage system with the created wett.tnds to
Lure continued water supply and pondittg opportutt.ttes.
-naUve plans were prepared clect^^pToint'^^'itv rnmmi^^ions numerous site visits lor staii anu
\l% were held, a neighborhood meeting for the
rs was held as well as a consultation vsith technical expert^
at of this process was many site plans. We believe the plan being
- ’dered by the MCWD is the best blend of wetland creation, protec
emovai.
io nothing alternative- in this case will actualh destroy the majority
• site’s wetlands because of agricultural use. Many i\ pc areas wi
verted into cropland in a normal rainfall \'oar. Therefor, me
jpement of the site into 2 acre plus lots, creation of major pondmg
wetland areas is an improvement to the site’s wetland assets.
acement Plan Components
A. 1. Applicant Tandem Properties
2705 Casco Point Road
Wayzata. Mn 55391
2. Corporation ’s Parmers in Project
Peter Andrea Com pain-
James Development Company
R. A. Putnam and Associates. Inc.
Contact: Richard A. Putnam, partner 471-0573
Mark Gronberg. engineer 473-4141
3. Engineering/Surveying - Miirk Gronberg
Wetland Studies Design - F. J. Svoboda and Associates
Owner - Richard Putnam
ml
ts
rt.
2ni
r a
5.
•se
VD
uct
B. Affidavit for wetland replacement
Attached exhibit
r 1
D. Replacement Wetlands
1. The grading plans and replacement/removal plan indicate
the areas proposed for replacement. The table of \%t?tland
replacement indicates the sizes of removal and replaced
weUands. The type of wetlands being replaced is
explained in the F.J. Svoboda and Associates report. The
type of replacement wetland is shown on the Replace
ment Plan with type I, II or 111.
2. The r-lOO’ scale Grading/Drainage pUm provides plans for
the drainage and wetland replacement. F.J. Svoboda iind
Associates will be consulting with the developer to
construct the Type I. II iind III wetlands.
3. The Coffin/Gronberg plans illustrate areas of excavation for
ponds, replacement or removal of existing draintile.
installation of outlet structures, and erosion control
measures.
4. The soils of the removed type 1 wetlands will be used o
rebuild tlie new type 1 areas. The Ha and Co soils in
these areas will support the new areas, likewise the
existing vegetation will fill in these areas.
5. Construction of the wetlands vsill begin with site grading in
April/May '94 with completion by July/August '94.
0. Applicant does not have form requested. (MCWD needs to
provide form.)
7. The replacement wetland was not previously restored or
created under prior approval plans. To tl'.e best
owner’s or applicant's knowledge. (R.A. Putnamly^^f^^
8. The replacement wetland was not drained or filled during
the past tenyea^ to applicant's knowledge. (R.A.
Putnam)
9. The replacemOTt wetland was not restored with financial
asistance from public conservation prt^aim to the
applicant ’s knowledge. (R.A. Putnam
10. The replacement was not r^ored with private loaned
funds. (R.A. Putnam)
11. The applicant will use its wetland consultant and ask tJie
MCVVD staff to evaluate the construction efforts during
the process and to inspect upon completion.
February 18, 1994
AFFIDAVIT
Ms. Hlen Sones
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
14000 Minnetonka Blvd.
Minnetonka, MN 55345-1597
Re: Affidavit confirming that wetland replacement for Permit
Application No. (Dickey/Coffin properties, Orono, MN)
%vili occur with %vetland fill.
Dear Ms. Sones.
As required by Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Conson ation
Act Rules, Chapter 8420.0530 (B), this letter is to serve as the affidavit to
assure you that the wetland replacement proposed as part of the above-
referenced project will be conducted concurrent v\ith the proposed
wetland fill. Both wetland fill and replacement will be accomplished as
part of one grading contract that will be carried out during the 1994
growing season.
Sincerely,
Tandem Properties and Peter Andrea Company
Richard Putnam
Partner
coapli4fiC€ witti tbf t«<;u«ncin(} requir«Mntt tzom local,^^90V€CAMnt unit bmtocm prcpAcinq m r«pl4C««eat plan.Subp. 3. tVAluntion. At provided for In pact S420.32IO. ctchalcnl cpjtstlons cooctrning thm public value* Location* size* 4nd typ# of wetland ihall be subnitted to the tecbnical avalujtioa panel. ?.ne local ^overiment unit nay use a tecbnical evaluation panel to pcedeterm.ne pebllc value* location* slae* or type of wetlands under its jurisdiction and use this deterniaatfon ia adninistecine the act. Zetland boundaries euat be determined ustriq the methodoioqles in the federal Manual foe Identifying and Delineating JurIsdicttonal Wetlands (January
19d9). Wetland type aost be identified according to Cowardin#
et al.* 1979* Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats
of the United States and according to United States Pish and
Wildlife Service Circular Mo. 39 (1971 edition) "Wetlands of che
United States.* The technical evaluation panel shall provide
its deteeminations to the local govecuaent unit for
consideiac*.on.
SAr KS s 14.OS; 103B.IQI; 1033.33S5
HIST: la SR 274
11420.0S20 saoonajwT^^
Subpact 1. Requirea^t. except for wetlands located in
^titltiwaaed ileXda thetace subject to subpart 8* and calcareous
fens that are subject to subpart 9* the local governaeot unit .
nay not consider or approve a wetland ceplaceaeot plan unless.
the local governaent unit finds that the applicant has
dcaonatrated that the activity iapacting a wetland has coaplled
with ail of the following pcinciples in descending order or
priority:
A. avoids direct or indirect iapacts to the wetland
that aay destroy or dlalnish the wetland under the criteria in
subp.irt 3;
a. ainiaizes the iapact to the wetland by limiting
the degree or magnitude of the wetland activity and its
ioplementat ion under the criteria in subpart 4:
C. rectifies the impact by repairing* rehabilitating*
restoring the affected wetland under the criteria in suoparc
S:
D. reduces or ciiminatts the impact to the wetland
over time oy preservation and maiateaance operations urvicr the
criteria in subpart 6; and
E. replaces unavoidable impacts to the wetland oy
restocing or creating substitute wetland areas having enuji or
^(«ater public value as provided for in pa*ti 0420.0S30 to
532? 2^30.
'iubp, 2. Afiplication options. An applicant may either
SUOmtt the Information required for seque.nctng analysis as part
^be application for replacement plen approval or apply for a
prelimrnmry aeqctncing determination from the local government
unit before preparing a replacement plan. The local qo^mxrmmr unit may request adJitionaX information needed to make a determination, for pco}acte impacting wetland actaa lean than O.l acres the local government unit may provide an oit-site sequencing determination without wtittam documencatiom from th applicant; eicept for projects wtiich art located im wetlanda adjacent to amd within 1*000 feet of outstanding ceeomcce vale waters as defined in chapter 70SO: trout streams as designatec iQ Commissioner's Order Sumbec 2294; and trout lakes as designated in Commissioner's Order Sumbec 2230.Subp. J. DetermiaatioQ of impmet avoidmmoe.
A. Avoidance must be required when indicated by part
8420.Q540* subpart 9.
B. Vttland dependenct determination:
(1| Based on information provided by tha
applicant, the local government unit shall determine if the
proposed project is wetland dependent. A project is wetland
dependent if wetland features* functions* or values are
essential to fulfill tbe basic purpose of the project. A
wetland present at the site of a proposed project does not make
that project wetland dependent.
(2) A project that has been determined by the
local government unit to be wetland dependent is eitmpt from th«
analysis of avoidance alternatives in item C.
C. Alternatives analysis:
(1) The applicant shall provide tbe local*
government unit with documentation describing at least two
alternatives in addition to the proposed project* onm of wtiich
may be the no-build alternative* that would avoid impacts to
wetlands. The alternatives may include consideration of
alternate sites or alternative project configurations on tb#
proposed site. The alternatives must be judged by the local
government unit as good faith efforts* or the local government
unit may require the applicant to redraft them for
cecensideration.
(2) The local government unit shall determioe
whether any feasible and prudent alteci^cives ace available tha*
would avoid impacts to wetlands. An alternative shall be
considered feasible and prudent if it is capable of being done
troe an engineering point of view, is in accordance with
accepted engineering standards and practices* is consistent wit*
reasonable regulrtnents of the public health* safety* and
welfare* is an environmentally preferable alternative based on a
review of social* economic* and tnvIror.iientaL impacts* and woulc
create no truly unusual problems. The local government ualt
shall consider the following in evaluating alternatives 41
applicable:
(a I whether the basic project purpose can be
reasonably accomplished using one oc DOie other sites ill the
same general acta that would avoid wetland impacts. A&
\ 14o
msy tyui D# Horn ccns id«r at ion onlyrCMttf it iscluddf or c^quir^s «n ar«A not own«d bf tn«>pllc«i%t tlut could c«JiOftabl/ bm obtJin«d, ut«d. aipaiuUd* oc in^qid to fuICill tfto bjstc pucpoM oC thm proposed pro]«ct:C&) th« qoMrai tuitabilicy ot aitacnata itas consldacad by tba appLlcanti(c) wfiotaac rtascaabla oodiCicatiOci ot lb#ixo. ftcopa configuration, or danjity oC tba pro|act uould aaoid ipacts to uatlmdj;(d) aCforta by tha applicnt to acconaodata: caoova ccnatcalntt on alttrnatlvai iapoaad by tociiog :andacds oc latrastcuctuca. inclodlo^ raq;uasta (oc conditional pacalti, 7actanccf. oc plannad unit davalopntiiti; and (a) tba physical, cccaoaic. and danoqrapbic
*^icanants of tba projact. Ecoocnic coasidarat tons alona do
It naka an altaxoativa not faasibla and pcudmot.
|J) If• tba local qovarnnant unit datarninas that
faasibla and prudent altarnatlva axiats that would avoid
'PdCta to watlaads. it sbaii dany tha caplacanrnt plan. IC no
*asiblt aod prudent altatnativa is available that *^uld av-oid
tpacts to uatlaodSf tba local govarnnanc unit shall avaluata
la rtplacenant plan for cospLianca with subparts 4 to 4.
Subp. 4. Datacniaatioa of inpact aiaiaizatioa.
a. Tha applicant shall danonstrata to tha local
»vtmnant onifs satisfaction that th# actl/ity will niniaiTt
ipaets to wetlands, lo raviawing tha sofCiclency of tha
>plicant*s efforts to ainiaiza vat land iapacts. the Local
ivaraaant unit aust considac:
(1) tha spatial requirements of the project;
(2) the location of existing structural ot
itural faatisras that oiay dictate tha placement oc conf igurJt ion
! tha project;
(3l tha purpose of the project and bow the
irpcse relates to placement, conf i*jurat ion. oc density:
y) the sensitivity of the site design to
^e natural features of the site, including topogciph/.
ideology, and existing vegetation:
(5) the value, function, and spatial
iStrltutlOA of the wetlands cc tne site;
C5) indi/idual jr.d O'iau.jtive lapacts; ind
iZ) xa applicant's efcorcs to:
(3) sodify the sire, scope.
Kifiguratita. or density of the prcjeci;
13) rcaove oc accoaaodace site
onstraintf ir.cluding toning, inf cast ructure. access, oc natural
eatures: aod
fcj otherwise ainialre »xpacts.
B. If the local goveffoient uni: finds that an
ppllcant has not ccapLied with tha rcqulccaents to ainiaire
•sfland lapacts. the local goverraier.t unit shall list. In
I
\
writing, its oojectiuna Id - • •applicant does not withdraw tha project proposal or Udicat# intent to subait an amended project proposal satisfying the local governastit unit’s objections, ths stattaent of objectineissnail constitute a denial.Subp. S. Ostscmloatloa of iapact cectlf lest loo. teaporacy impacts to a wetland aust be rectified by rspsicing. rehabiUtatiag. oc restoring the affected wetlaad.X. Xctivltles may qualify Cot a no-loss detttalMtloo in part 1420.0220 by meeting all of the foliowlag ccm^tioast (1) the physical characteristics of the affected wetland, including ground elevations# contours. Inlet diaensioas. outlet dimensions# substrate, and hydrologic are restored to pr.project conditions sufficient to ensue# that
all preproject functions and values are restored:
C2| the activity Is completed and the physical
characteristics of tbe wetland are restored within six months oi
th. st.ct oC th. .cti.ltfl *n<l
(3) th. p.ctf tespooaihl. for ih. activity
provid«s « p.cfor«anc* bo«a to th. local govatwnt tth.t *«
aKuAt saCfici.at to cov.e th. .stl*at.d coat to t.scor. t^
wetland to pccproject cooditiona. '?he local 90Wttn«.ftt «n t
shall rttuen th. pecfocoance bond to th. c.apoaslbl. party u^n
a d.t.caination by th. local 90v.cnn.nt .nit that th. conditions
in this it.m and ItM a hav. b..o net.
B. An applicant shall b. 9rant.d a no-loss
daterninatioA under the criteria in It*. A one. in a t.n-y.4»
p«tiod for a particular ail. within a wetland, asc.pt that
repairs to th. ociginal project shall b« allowed under the
no-loss d«tec«ination. If the local goveemwot ualt detet«loes
th. request to be n.ctsaary and reasonable.
C. Wetland inpacts that do not qualify for a no-los»
deterelr.ation according to th. cticetia in iieo A ate subject to
replaces.nt under th. criteria in pacts 8120.0530 to StJO.OslO.
Subp. 6. Oetetainal ton of reduction t.c .lieloation of
iapacts over tiae. Aft.: an activity is coaplet.J, Cutth.e
uetljp.d :spacts from the draining or filling aust b. reduced oc
eliaitated by aaintaining. opetacing, and managing the proj.ee
in a cannec that pteierves and maintains remaining wetland
functions and values. The local government unit aust requite
applicants to implvnect ocst Management practice* to protect
wetland (unctions and values.
Subp. 7. Onavoidable impacts. Una/oidatle wetland iMpacts
that remain after efforts to ain-aiz., rectify, oc reduce or
eliainate them must b. replaced according to parts 8420.051 to
3420.0630.
Subp. 8. Wetlands on cultivated fields. If the wetland is
located Of. a cultivated field, replacement must be accompLIs-neJ
through restscation without regard to the priority orde. •
lutpact 1. A wetland drained ot filled under this provision
msc net b« converted to none^ricalteral Und foe cvn y««cs.Tho londownoc «ist esecutv and record « notice of thisoffice of tee cwiotr cecoedec foe the coent/ la tditch the pcopetty is located.fe. **» <^*«**««i* f««*. Calcareoes fens, as identifieddL drained, or otieevlsede^iadwl, wnoUy or partially, by any action, ooless tbewMisslcaer. under oa approved oanaqenent plan, decides tem aitecatlofl is.aeceseary, as provided in pact •420.1010.SAs MS s 14.04; IJIB.IOI; 10Ja.3J5S OZST: II SR 374
M20.0S3I aSUCB«3«T PtAM______
Ob a n application fora provided local qovernnent
vvtland book in parts 8420.0700
iLfJ J ? ' v**“ ■ 0 do not apply; Instead the applicant
transfer fora prescribed la part
3420.0740, svib^rt 2. iera Z:
A. oeyaaizatlonal inforoatlcn. inclodlno the
rolloi#ing:
^ <1| the post office address of the applicant;
V |2| for cocpocaeloas, the principal officers of
the CTcpotttlon. any parent coepenies. owners, partners, and
jolne venturers, end e desi9natcd contact person;
V (3) oana^lng aqents. subsidiaries, or consultants
ir^ieJt; ^ involved with the wetland dcainin., or filling
*'***^‘<*-*''^t confientnp that the wetland
Icalnin^oi 5?iiT**^^*^!** *’*^®'* concurrent with the actual
if cemA^¥ filUaq of a wetland or an irrevocable bank letter
mi! !! ° sscucit, acceptable to the local geveronent
eplacealUt•*"'** successful coopletion of the wetland value
C. for the iepjcted wetland;
m a cecenc aerial phcto-jtapn or acc-jtate laap of
.'.e ispacted wetland area;
>/ (2) the location of the wetland, including the
:=unf/. watershed sane or nusber. and public land survey
.oocdi.iate of appcoiioMte w-tlancJ center;
*i-< >f the wetland, tn acre, or square
f C;
,-ui ‘^tlind using United States Fish
Circular NO. 39 (1971 edition) and National
wentory sapping conventions (Covardin et al.. 1979);
Jo«»n*nt vegetation in the
•«*eedlfia**>i *”** *r*s* including comon naaas of the vegetation
• rainla aJ co-.'scage and an estimate of coverage, for
»«pl«. SO percent willow. 20 percent cattails, and 30 percent
31^
\V ^
o
^ (€1 € soil! Mp of %oii t/P« Modsubstrate. *^«rs avaLIabls:^ {!) to# SIX# of th« #sc«csb#d tb#t dcaiaa tiftcUct #«t«c Into tn# wstlaiwl as datacainad fro* a Uftitod Statas CovaraMot Sorv«y tapogcapbical map oc otbaf saitablt topographical sorvayiw' <8) trta locations of anp aacfact Inlata or ootlatSs natural oc otharvia#* dcaiaiog loto oc o«t of tha watljnds, jod if tha vatiand is aittiln the floodplaia of a stcaaa. river, or cthec ^ataccoocsop cha discaoca and diraction
to tue wataccoaesa;
Hi a *ap# photoqcapha or arittan dascriptlon of
the laod lasa of tha iflaadiata vatershad aitain ona alia of tha
lapacftd aatiaAd. tha sutcoondioq land asa inforMtioa shall
also ifidicata tha ptasanca and location, if any. of liatlaad
prasaevatton rtglcns and araas. i#atland davalopaant avoidance
ragions and araas, and Mtland daflciant ragicns and areas as
idantifiad in tha co*prehansiva vatec plan;
(10) tha natora of tha proposad project, its
Jaaal axtent. and tna iapact on tha wetland aust ba shown In •
sufficient detail to allow the local gowarnaanc unit to
dataraina tha aacant and types of wetland to ba iapactad and to
demonstrate coeipltanca with tha raplacaaaat satpiancifi^ erltacia
In pact i420.0S?0. If applicable;
(III evidence of omacsbip or rights to tha
affected areas, including a legal dasCbiption. Whan two or aora
landowners ace involvcda incladlog toch tha impact site and the
proposed rtplaceaent site, a contract or other evidence of
ageeeaeot signed by all lacdownacs and notarized must ba
included with the replacement plan. The contract oc agraaaanc
must contain an acknowledgment of the covenant provisions in
item 0. subitem (4>, by landowners on which a replacement
w>*tLand is proposed and the locaclcn and acreage of replacaaant
wetlands. The contract becomes binding upon final appr^jwal of
the repLaceeent plan;
(12) a list ot all other local, state, and
federal pacaits and approvals required foe the activity; and
(13) other information considered necessary by
the local gevernment unit lot evaluation of the acrivlty;
O. foe the replacement wetland, tree C. suCitems (1)
to (^) a.hd (11) to (131, and:
(II an explanatioa of the sire and type of
wetland that will result from successfu. coaplttion of the
repiactaent plan;
(2) scale drawings showing plan and profile views
of tha replacement wetland and fixed photo-rtferenca points for
monitoring purposes.* Photo-reference points should Inctcda
views of any control structures and e.nough aJditional points to
adequately depict the entire pco)ect:
laa
(1) hOi# thm s«pUc«Mat ^11ynttimctmd, lot •Kcjv^tion or restoration by blockin<|1 MisclA^ tile; tb« type, site, and specificatioae of outlet tnictucee; eievttioca, reletlve to Nee:: Sea Leeel or subllilied beocb earb, of key features, foe eaaapie. sill* sergency oeerfloe, and structure height: aaJ best eanageeant tact ices that eili be laplseeated to preeetit erosion or site tgradatloa; ,(II foe created «»etlaada only, addltiooal soils aformatioo sufficiect to deteraSoe the capability of the site s produce and aaineair ««etiand characteristics:(^) a tiaatable that clearly states hov uheo
apleaencation of the replaceeent plan shall proceed, and uhen
oast ruction of the replaceeent uetlaod shall he final i led;
(4) a notice in a fora provided by the board
ttached to and recorded with the deed for lands containing a
tplaceacnt eetland, specifying the followiag:
(a> the location of the replaceeent uetlaod:
|b| that the vietland is subject to the act;
|c) that the fee title ounec is responsible
fhe costs of repairs or reconstruction, if necessary, or for
tplaceeeot coats:
(d| that reasonable access to the
tplaeeeeot eetiand shall be granted to the proper authorities
>r iaspectioa« eoaitoring, and enforcement purposes;
(e) that oosts of title review and docuaent
tcording is the respoosibility of the fee title owner; and
(f) that the local governaent unit or board
in require necessary repairs or reconstruction work to return
wetland to the specifications of the approved replaceeent
Ian and require reinburseitent of reasor.able costs fron the
etiand owner, or ran require cepljcemer.t of the wetland
rcording to the act:
(7) 1 statement that the r«pLaceiient wetland was
previously restored or created unoec a prior approved
eplacenent plan;
(5) a stitvsen: thjt the replace*v>ent wetland was
Qt drained or filleJ under in eteaptior. during the pceviaus t^n
ears;
(I) 1 St tteavnt that tne replacement wetland wjs
Ot cestoted with financial iuistance fcocs public ccn^»ec*/* t i on
rograss;
(10) j statement that tr.e replaceaent wetland was
ot ccstoceJ uiing private funds other than zho%€ cf the
andcvnec. unless the funds are paid back with icreresc to the
ndividual or crganiration that funded tr.e cestoration end the
ndividual cr organiiatlon notifies the local qovarr.eenc unit in
writing that the rtstcced wetland aay be corsidored fer
eplacenenc;
(II) a p.an for sonitoclng the success of the
replacMcnt plan in eeetlfig the project goal in fublta* (1)# ar.d s% specified In parts •420.0410 and 8120.0420; and(12) other Inforeatloe consldeeed necessary foe evaluation of the project by the local governeent salt.K. the applicant nust provide iefornatlon known to the applicant or readily evnilable concerning the spec lei considerations criteria le part •120.0810, subpact •.Sai NS s 14.04: lOll.lOli iaiB.33S8 BZSTt 10 SB 274•420.0510 Bzpucafsirr ruui ithrjOBtton cminBih.Subpart 1. Seciueeclng. iefore consideration or approval
of a replacenent plan, the local governnent unit Wt ensnte
that the applicant has eihausted all possibilities to avoid and
ninlnlze adverse wetland inpacts according to itquenclng in part
8120.0520.
The applicant nust demonstrate to the local governnent unit
that the replacenent plan conplies with this pact and part
8120.OSSO.
Subp. 2. Type of repleccneet. The order of preference for
the nethod of repUcenent. fron nost preferred to least
preferred, is project-specific restoration, project-specific
creation, then wetland banking. Nodificatioo or conversion of
nondegraded wetlands fron one wetland type to anocher, foe
esaaple by inpoundaent of additional water, does not constitute
adequate replacenent. Wetlands drained or filled under an
erenption nay not be restored for replacenent credit for ten
years after draining or filling.
Subp. 3. Tiniog of replacenent. teplacenent of wetland
values nust be conpleted before or concurrent with the actual
draining or filling of a wetland, unless an Irrevocable Kanh^
letter of credit or other security acceptable to the responsible
government cnit is subnitted to the responsible governeent unit
to guarantee successful completion of the replaceeent. All
wetlands to be restored or created (or replacenent must be
designated Cor replaceeent before restoration or creation.
Submission to the local go/ernment unit cC the inforeaticn
required in pact 8U0.05J0 and subsequer.t approval shall be
con:ivlereJ evidence oC designation for replaceeent, provided the
information is subeitted before the actual restoration oC
creacion.
Subp. i. Location of replaceeent wetlands. Weplaceeant
wetlands shall be located within the same watershed or county as
the impacted wetlands, escept that counties cr watersheds in
which 80 percent or more oi the presettleeent acreage is Intact
■ay accomplish replacement in count les or watersheds in which 50
percent or more of the presetclesent wetland acreage has been
filled, drained, or otherwise degraded. Replacement wetlar.dt
should be located as close to the impacted wetland as posslhlt*
preferably In the same watershed.
ii £ ^ V# M »• •.^. • V. t^*.‘k\ ’. * fc«- ' 4 A 4 4
la aublt«a U)* *r<^
: an£
sMcy Coc
Mat (uiic.
<m kaoM to
I th« spaelal
ib9«ct 9.
COFFIN & GRONBtRG, INC.amtvrrtNo. KMamacivNO and lamo piannino A42.A Ta MAWA C K AVn<IU6 tjOMO LAAC. MINN. eUA«/«*•/
473-4141
TANDEM PROPERTIES
WETLAND MITIGATION SUMMARY
FEBRUARY 10,1994
JA.
eioo at app'o^**-
Halt wst «ns«c«
iLltlas to and
;o fequaocln^ 4n pact
Mil qo««caaMnt unit
I (Mitt and pact
c of pcafactoea foe
ced to ItaJt
pcojact-spMlflc
on Of ctsavaesLoa of
to anoctiac# foe
doea not consticutt
fillad uiidac an
tne cxedlt foe tan
:eMnt of vatland
lAt Vlth ta# actaal
) Irrevocabla bank
3la to the ttsponsibla
sible qovaensant unit
ceplaccacnc. All
laceiaeat must be
ion oc cceatiOA.
tti€ infocnaticn
approval shall be
ljc€»ent4 provided the
cestOfJtion oc
nds. Replacenent
wAceeshed oc county as
fs cc watersheds In
sent acreage Is intact
wActesheds Ifa which 50
inJ ACceAgt has bten
leplAceaent wetlands
i wetland as possible#
1. DICKEY SITE
A. nigTURBED AREAS
1. Wetland 1 b; Lot 19, Block 2
2. Wetland 1 c; Lots, Block2&road
3. Wtedand 1 a; Lots 17,18, Block 2
4. W«land 2 a; Lot 17, Block 2, & road
5. Welland 14; Lot 2. Block 1, & road
B. MITIGATED AREAS
1. Lotos a 9. Block 2
2- Lot 19, Block 2
3. Lots 18 & 19, Block 2
4. Lots 16 A17, Block 2
5. Lot 16. Block 2
6. Lots 3, 5, 6,13, Block 2
7. Loti, Block 2
8. U^s 1-6, Block 1
0.12 acres
0.38 acres
1.11 acres
0.16 acres
0.11 acres
Total 1.88 acres
0.48 acres
0.17 acres
0.18 acres
0.18 acres
0.15 acres
0.19 acres
0.38 acres
\ 50 acres
Total 3.23 acres
- ^2. CQPFIM SUE
A. DISaiRBED AREAS
1. Wetland 10 a; Lot 1, Block 1, Ditch
2. Wetland 10 a; Lot 1, Block 1, For pond
3. Wetland 8 c; Lot 5, Block 1, For Beam
4. WtOand 8 d; Lot 6, Block 1, For Beam
5. Wddand6t>; Lot 15. Block 1
8. Wetland 8 b. Lot 14, Block 1
7. WfeOand 11 b; Lots 11,12, Block 1 & road
8- Wetland 11 a; Lot 11, Block 1 & road
2. Lot 2, Block 1
3. Lots 2 & 3, Block 1
4. Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, New Areas
5. Lots 6 & 7, Block 1
6. Lot 15, Block 1
7. Lot 8, Block 1
8. Lots 9,12.13, Block 1.
9. Lots 11,12, Block 1
10. Lot 20, Block 1.
11. Lot 17, Block 1
Total Disturted a 1.88 + 0.89 = 2.77 acres
Total Mitigated * 3.23 + 2.73 - 5.96 acres
0.18 acres
0.32 acres
0.04 acres
0.07 acr^
0.06 acres
0.13 acres
0,05 acres
Q.Qlacres
Total 0.89 acres
0.11 acres
0.15 acres
0.13 acres
0.76 acres
0.30 acres
0.06 acres
0.20 acres
0.50 acres
0.13 acres
0.20 acres
0 19 acres
Total 2.73 acres
»*•. A, ‘* ■ * W •COFFIN & GRONBFRG, INC.SUm/CYlNa. CNOJNtJtHfNa and lAND PkAHKiHa 4H?.A TAMARACiC AV'tNUt LOHr» I AXr. MiNUi
47^-At41
(3)
TANDfcM PROPERTIES
SUMP^ARY OF DISTURBED WbOANDS
FEBRUARY 10, 1994
A. DICKEY SITF
1. WETLAND 1 c.
TN* K ^igWy disturbed Type 1 basin usually farmed. Tie road needs to
^eneigndois to the south are not going to allow any connection to Manor
2. WETLAND 1 h
te !?? • disturbed Type 1 basin usuaty farmed. The house pad
^ S^il^ ™ development, but the tUure home ownerwould IScoly want more space so this is being considered now.
3. wetland 1 a
This >ra$ fumed in more typical years. The wetter central portion will
undisturbed and the outlying portions support both wetland and
upi^ weeds. Only these outiymg areas are proposed to be disturbed and
mainly for ample yard area outside of Ifw budding pads.
4. WETLAND 2 a
^ 1$ another highly dsturbed Type 1 basin usuaBy farmed. Because of
city requirements on road curvature, this area can not be avoided bv the
proposed road. ^
5. WETLAND 14
Tte Type 2 pastwed area with degraded wetland hmctions. Because
or the cay need for a connection road and certain minimum curve
requirements this area can not be avoided. However, only the western tm
was crossed and only at 0.11 acres. ^
^ of the representives of the agenciee that visfted the site and the wetland
report indicated that these were highly degraded wetlands not servmq
their ork^i purpose and their demise would create no great loss.
«• A. A COFbTN GRONBiiRG, INC.SMJAVCYIMC;. BMOlN^JUNO AND LAND PLANKlfsK; 4JI2-A TaMAAACA AVl!NUe
LONG LAK£^ MINN. 5Ci3Aa
A73-41A1
(4)
This is a Type 2 wetland. However, the above agencies agreed the swale
leading to this wetland with fts 18 toot drop was of marginal value. Thus
orty this marginal swale area is proposed to be altered for the necessary
road connection and proposed pond area which capture aB runoff though
the swale and treat It before It reaches the main part of this wetland.
^ WETLANDS ^
These two small depressions (tractor ruts) are very marginal Type 1
wetlands and are being improved to a better Type 3 wetland area.
z WETLANDS 6 b & 8 b
These are also Type 1 degraded wetlands usuaPy fiaumed which do not need
to be (fi^urbed by this development but would Hkely be used by a future
home owner, so they are being accounted for now.
This wetland is also a Type 1 disturbed area usuaBy fermed of which a small
portion is impacted because of the necessary road location and septic site
location nearby.
^ Ttenwttfpo^ of this Type 2 wetland is actually the road ditch for ad
Crystal Road and this dttch needs to be crossed In one area.
Tbe number of lots on this sfte has been reduced form
lots m order to preserve as many wetlands as possible. Only the
i wetlands have been dWurbed in as minimum a way as possible and mmaiaccordance wfth recommendations in the wetlands classification report
Sincerely,
COFFIN & GRONBERG
Mark S. Gronberg
- 4*r
1 i ITB
^ ■■' . I
L- '>1
D
i i
ziTi;
Ay
n>s»*
m fl MM
^-y.:
'wwHMnniBnH- jrf «■
jHfellp-^^
\' 'V./ 4'':
T'.-*: '•> : '
*r
i.?
F
fl
v»
f
.■f
fs
rt
.r*
k;
; i
r.‘
■ •'
I
fffp.
*r
filMvm mmw
,'4‘,
n
c/>
H
>r
CD
>
-<
Xo
>
D
'■■i'V*.‘4VM*'!'
■n
i«
I*
S'.
u*
♦
Ej
3
rL
COur
3
v/»
p>«
"O
a
o'
3
' ‘ (^v
'&' f*' » -i. !J
:«ittS32k^
X!
w'
>
-o
73r~\
'■>J
-Mm
73
k • ‘ !.«II2J
fm
■ C',v;r •'Mi
■4-m
i'^
I -Km ■>. • < ij
v' •.PPPWii?^
?®ii
'..'■■)V-Vj.
<-*'-’v
S' •■‘•4'
r Ikii^
i
:!
»
ilnPiMi
pwjPi
p
‘^v'‘:
:%•
W'fmm;
-iIVi.li
- 4. ». ' • 1 4
w
in<o
9?
2r
S'
ri
W^'
Z ta
I
s
S
?K
3
a.
3
o
Itf
S?
r»
1^
I
» J
Bl
Q-
CU
3
CL
CO
&:
3
m
(u
ty>
(-►
“Oo5
5‘
3
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD S
'■4i
% ^
:V ■ ■■ Ui’Jk.*'''- -.r
I \j 1 vma< '• • • . *) .^’,S:
7-^f
Lag
* i' ' V -
• -.i
ri!K..'^r:,L2i
'■ • ->^1;
-1 f^-"'
li
■ w ■ '■
4
■f 5.
i!..Aiy ?.
U ■
',#■ I •''
•> N - i^'T:.* • - 1 ' ■' \k
r "y'
•V. ■♦ • /‘
'•’*.i'v. u.
'•A''v.> •
t f,I
w‘:
O
PO
O
o
-<
V
/am
iC
PC
O
rrf
?3
J
■ /
I
1 • •
* iV-i-U
P/If :
4 Ii»
0?.-4
■ft’
•1
»
.
.* f
A-.
k r
I I ?:
iliv
4»
I
o
-1o3O
§
ftv<
\
S '
•'- 4m I . • '• ^ *
WILLOW DRIVE S
, f
t •
< >,
\ •
*
»
V.t i. » 'A I ♦
.V . t • .
\ •'• i' .
■'i
CXD ZR'iSTkL BM ROAD o>
f— o» m o
0 3 3 0 3 o .«Q -n
id — “»i
"U 3
r- •— ft> z
o* CD
?r 3 “I B»
(1> 3
• 0> • O
3 W
jC VI f~ O
*-• tv i:3 53
Cl m3
Drov»o
rt
iCk)
PD
Ln CD
C -
3 <
fD Z
*< fD
O •
3
iA
O O </l
Qt O* O
r-t rt IV
>00 v» a
t/> I
C ••
CL I O
hJ.rfK
■
X^ f-nm -ri ^-T3 -H O 2 •—^OCiClO -H O fio O X Cl :t> z o :z-H ;3o -D >
-< • • •—I• |— - 2^
• o :>
2 00 o o• c: m z pz > -o m ^ z r-CO ^ >o ^ z
^ r*«J nioee*/
\
.i«4'
<<«««•«
Ml W*4U« mmm4
’-'irt
■ ‘v}4^\:m
- A • ‘
s\v '?Sai'
;& I-v***
» i
G
rti
Mxi^x::—,—
'ii'pif F'i->^ ■
,i5e15?<f-<r p^kiiS <.<='''"'<■
ifrJjn? CAST. ■
I ^ •• .
1
J3 < h
^DESCRIPTIOM
i^PM«lcr«tf'tan^ Survey No 13^0
H-"
;s fb^ /LL.i^FT'nA^'^^
.iv
j •■. pi/jf.porri
■ • Acc..v<.rtAr^ /
kX T(^- * • .•« '
■ • '■■ • • • ■ij^cby certify that thit lurvey wat treoared ny rr>€ or
IMI ' * 0'^* P«J-»«"-‘0
/J-7^
«
\
BtJ MO
):y I ■ •. ' • ■. * »
SlV;
#i;v ■ ■
\Le\^'iINCH’too FEET
J^JS^aJ'n ai'c-V. r^ro^ciioeo
<*%• I y*
7
<J\
\
.
r\\ 1
\
>v.
\\y,
V1.W*c-tt
GORDON P. COFFIN
land surveyor 6 PLANNER
i
■ ^
To;Orono Planning Commission Members
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator
From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building «& Zoning Administrator
Date:January 14, 1994
Subject: //1901 Tandem Properties, 2645/3025 Watertown Road - Public Hearing
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Applicant ’s Addendum
C - Property Owners List
D - Plat Map
E - Council Action Notice 10/28/93
F - Council Minutes 11/8/93
G - Planning Commission Minutes 10/18/93
H - Draft Park Commission Minutes 1/6/94
I - Resolution No. 1408 Approving Countryside Manor Plat
J - Engineer ’s Report 1/7/94
K - Weckman Report 1/13/94
L - Designated Wetland Map
M - Drainage Summary
N - Watershed Map
O - Wetland Basins-Coffm Property
P - Wetland Basins-Dickey Property
Q - Preliminaiy Plat First Pha^e-Dickey Property
R - Preliminarv' Plat First Phase-Coffin Property
Brief Review of Application
Applicant has filed a formal plat for 25 lots (15 Dickey property, 10 Coffin property)
proposed as the first phase development of a total 46-lot subdivision. The second phase will be
filed as soon as the necessary septic testing has been completed for the remaining 21 lots. The
Planning Commission completed a sketch plan review of the comprehensive proposal at your
October 18, 1993 meeting (review Exhibit G).
The following ordinances are pertinent for this review;
1. Chapter 11 - All ordinances pertinent to Class III subdivisions involving
dedication of roads, drainage and utility easements and variances.
Zoning File ^1901
Januarv 14, 1994
Pace 2 of 9
2. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - 26 ’ setback must be maintained from designated
wetlands by all structures and land alterations. Review’ Coffin parcel subdivision,
note encroachment by cul-de-sac plat road and retention/ireatment pond within
Lot 1. Block 1.
3. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards.
4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 - Special standards for back loLs.
5.Section 10.55, Subdivision 3 - Definitions.
Definition 10.
Definition 14.
Definition 15.
Definition 16.
Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL)
Wetlands or marshlands.
Wetlands vegetation types.
Wetlands soil types.
6.
7.
8.
Section 10.55, Subdivision 5 - Defines the protected areas of the City and adopts
the aerial overlay maps.
Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 - Land development and platting. City to obtain
drainage easements over designated conservation areas.
Section 10.55. Subdivision 25 (A) - The necessary findings for granting
variances to this section, specifically review finding 7.
Pertinent Facts for First Stage Development
Dickey Site (15 lot.s)
Total area = 38.25 acres exclusive of road outlot. Wetland conservation areas
were not designated by the City within this property. Applicant proposes
1.96 acres of retention/treatment areas for surface water detention and
treatment.
Total dry = 36.29 acres.
Coffin Site (10 lots)
Total acreage = 26.79 acres exclusive of road.
W
Total dry = 22.52 acres
Designated wetland and retention areas = 4.27 acres
r
Zoning File #1901
January 14, 1994
Pace 3 of 9
Description of Subdivision
Applicant proposes a first phase subdivision of the Dickey properly at 15 lots and Toffin
property at 10 lots. The proposed road outlot w ithin Dickey parcel w ill link Countryside Drive,
a public road, to Old Cry stal Ba> Road. Refer to E.xhibits I and Q. .At the time of the platting
of Country side Manor. Country side Drive was designated a public road and the City was to take
over maintenance at the time the road was a through road. The road outlot on the Coffin
property- will be a private cul-de-sac road at approximately 1,250 lineal feet. Extension outlots
have not been proposed to the west or nonh.
Review Exhibit F. At the November 8, 1993 meeting of the Council. Council advised
that Types 1. 2, 7 and 8 wetlands not designated on the City’s conservation area maps must be
dealt w ith by other governing agencies before City would lake official action on an application.
The Ciiv would not amend its ordinances nor conservation area maps as a result of the new
classification of wetlands. If an application involved the filling of the.se undesignated areas, that
any matter of mitigation would be dealt with by other appropriate agencies. Per Council’s
directive, the "undesignated" wetland areas would not be shown as drainage easements and these
areas would be credited against dry buildable. It was also decided that a 75’ setback would not
be required for septic drainfields from a Type 1 wetland. The only areas to be designated with
drainage easements would be the designated wetlands as shown on E.xhibit L and the retention
areas required for surface water control and treatment as shown on the preliminary plans (not
the mitigation areas).
The Park Commission has reviewed this application at several meetings. Outside of the
3-acre park outlot shown on the Dickey property known as the Ancient Ones Park, the
Commission is not asking for additional park lands. Some members have encouraged developer
to designate interior park trails, but to keep them tor private use and not for public use. Both
Park Commission and City Engineer have asked that the City’s Comprehensive Development
Plan for bike trails along Old Crystal Bay Road be implemented by Tandem Properties installing
bike trail along east side of Old Cry stal Bay Road. The subdivision is reviewed in more detail
as follows;
Lot Configuration
All lots meet the required 2 acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of designated
wetlands and retention/treatment ponds. All lots e.xcept for Lot 3, Block I on the Dickey
property meet the required lot width at the tront/sireet setback measuring approximately 190 .
Lot lines can be easily adjusted to satisfy 200’ width requirement.
Zoning File .<^1901
Januarv 14. 1994
Pace 4 of 9
The following are classified as through lots and conditional use permits would be required
for any accessory structure installed at some future date:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 and Lots 1. 2. 3 and 4. Block 1 all within the Dickey
parcel.
Two lots within the Coffin property achieve access via a 30’ private driveway outloi.
Lots 6 and 7. Members should review the recent code amendment. Section 11.31. Subd. 5 (C)
(1) entitled "Applicability". Please review applicant’s addendum (Exhibit B) that addresses the
need for the back lot configuration. Has developer supported the need for back lots.^ Section
B of code specifically states that back lot configurations should not be used when dividing a
large parcel into numerous lots and may not be used as a tool for the convenience of the
developer. The question to ask the developer - can cul-de-sacs be extended further south? If
you are satisfied with the presentation of facts and findings, then Planning Commission may
wish to recommend approval of the back lot configuration. If back lots are approved, then
surveyor must redesignate setback areas. The north/south lot line would be front yard and not
side yard as shown. Front and rear yards would now' be designated at 75 ’ and side yards at 45’.
House location on Lot 7 would have to be moved 5 feet to the south. House site on Lot 6 would
satisfv the 75 ’ setback.
All future improvements shall be subject to special standards of this code section. The
yard in Lot 5. adjacent to outlot. is already at 50 ’. Side yard of Lot 14 appears to be 50 ’ but
the side yard adjacent to the outlot in Lot 15 would have to be expanded to 50 ’. This w ill not
impact proposed house locations for Lot 15. Note lot areas of 6 and 7 meet the required 1505^
area requirement but note the acres are not of contiguous dry buildable. In discussing this with
Mike Gaffron. he noted that this was not an issue during the review of this ordinance amendment
as there was a need to provide additional space for buffering and that the minimum area required
for zoning district had to be satisfied. Does the Planning Commission have any comments
concerning this issue? Any resolution approving the subdivision must include reference to the
back lot section of the code as it may impact future development of Lots 6 and 7.
Drainage/Grading/Wetlands
Per Council ’s directive, the applicant has filed the preliminary’ plans for permit approval
at both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the local governmental unit responsible for
implementing the National Wetlands Act. and on the federal level the Corps of Engineers. As
of this writing the City has received no comment but staff will provide status report at the public
hearing. In the first phase development for both properties, less than '/i acre of undesignated
Type 1 wetlands shall be filled for required road improvements. As required, applicant has
shown 2:1 replacement. The .VICWD has confirmed that no tilling of Type 1, 2, 7 or 8
wetlands will be allowed without permits. ITie only improvement that will be allowed without
permit will be the maintenance of a lawn area. No structures will be allowed.
Zoning File n^l901
January 14. 1994
Page 5 of 9
The issue for staff has been how do we provide proper notice to a landowner who
purchases a lot with these undesignated wet'and types as they will not be shown as drainage
easements. The final resolution will list the lots that have involvement but it will be necessary
to create an instrument for the filing against the Chain of Title of each property that w ill include
mapping and metes and bi’mnds descriptions of the location of the various type wetlands with a
disclaimer that before any land alterations or structures arc proposed within those protected
areas, that they first obtain the necessary approvals from the Corps and the MCWD.
The City is in receipt of the drainage study prepared for the surface water controls. The
Citv Engineer has been given the information and staff will provide a report on his comments
at our meeting along with the preliminary comments of the Watershed District and Corps. In
reviewing the first phase development of both parcels, there is very linle involvement of the
”undesignated" wetland types. The second phase of development will raise far more critical
reviews in the development of a building site, specifically review the Dickey second phase Lots
17 and 18.
It would be helpful at our meeting if the sur\eyor would designiite any mitigation areas
not included within retention/treatment ponds to be designated as drainage easements and
e.xcluded from lot areas. Types I and 2 mitigation areas will be included as dry buildable area.
Review E.xhibit H. The property is located w ithin three major watersheds -l^ke Classen,
Ma.xwell Bay and French Creek. The majority of drainage from the property flows to French
Creek. Review preliminary' plans, the majority ot site drainage is routed through established
drainageways onto adjacent properties. Per the preliminary plans, developier proposes outlet
drainage at the southwest comer of the Cottm property and directing drainage along Luce Line
to both the east and west. Major runoff areas will continue to flow at the southeast corner ot
Coffin property and southwest comer of Dickey property. The City mast review the impact of
downstream drainage im the established drainage routes. The DNR will review the proposal on
January 14. They are concerned with the impact of two drainage retention basins adjacent to
Luce Line. It has been their e.xperience that when this is allowed to happen, it results in the
undermining of the trail bed. The high elevation ot the Luce Line at the southwest comer is
984. The invert elevation is at 987, three feel above the trail. This should be reviewed. Staff
will relay any concerns of the DNR at your meeting. It is my understanding that they are also
concerned with the drainage that outlets via Lot 6, Block 1 in the Dickey parcel outletting at the
Thompson fami property and eventually to the DNR park.
All land alteration will necessitate the installation ot erosion control and must remain
installed and in place until groundcover is restored. As Engineer s report notes, the City code
reijuires a 26 ” setback from designated wetlands tor all land alterations. He notes that there are
two locations on the Coffin property, specifically the rei^uired grading of the southerly cul-de-sac
shown at 7’ higher than the adjacent protected wetland. He notes the cul-de-sac can either be
lowered or moved south to avoid the .setback encroachment. The other is in Lot 1, BkKk I at
Zoning File #1901
January 14. 1994
Page 6 of 9
the southeast comer of the Coffin property w here the reientioa^lreatment pond is located nght
at the edee of the wetland. Engineer notes that this would be a logical location tor the pond
which will function to protect the wetland from sediment deposition and would appear to satist\
some of the necessary findings for granting variances to encroachment ot a wetland as tollows.
1. Would proposal be consistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses
compatible with the preservation of the natural landforms. vegetation and t e
marshes and wetlands?
Would proposal include development of land and water areas essential to continue
the temporarv withholding of rapid runoff of surface water which would create
downstream 'tlooding or pollution? The Planning Commission should make a
rcconimcndation concerning this encroachment.
Review Exhibit J. The City Engineer's preliminarv- report asks that all mitiption areas
also be designated with drainage easements. This would not be consistent with Council s
directive. Surveyor should be asked if this will have an impact on drv’ buildable ot each k
Parks. Trails, Park Dedication
Please review the Park Commission minutes of Thursday, Januarv' 6, 1994, E.xhibit H.
The Park Commission reviewed the most recent plan for the first stage ot development of the
mComn^ny. Th. developer advised they have been unable .0 fmd any conclus.ve
evidence or supportive dtKumentation that would identify the property as having historica
significance Mn^DOT has hired a consultant who is working closely with the Indian Council
lo'detemiine if the site has some sienificance requiring preservation but the process will take a
few “and may not be resolved un.tl May of 1994. If i. is found tha. .here ,s no htstorteal
significance, the property will be developed as a single family lot.
The park ouilot is located wiihin the first phase development and may have io Jbe
d^oi s^:S aL aVared »
ila, rt ChvTnlv allows credi. for the iratls adjacent to road right-ot-ways that share .he 10
drainage and utility easements that run along the sides ot public roads.
Bod. Park Commission and Engineer ask that
Old Crystal Bay Road -><.-“11 as pan of the^^^^^^
?.;larS^'TmU.“Se':™ -ils W..1 be public or private will have
an impact on the area a^d if dial would
from Park Commission concerning the cost to tne ue.eiopci
have any impact on park dedication tee.
Zoning File #1901
January 14. 1994
Page 7 of 9
Septic
Weckman notes all 25 lots have been found to have suitable area for primary' and
alternate drainfield sites suitable for 5-bedroom home. Lots 2 and 7. Block 2 have been granted
a variance for an slope for the alternate drainfield site. A condition of subdivision approval
must include request that an old well pit be property sealed on Lot 2. Block 2. In response to
the Park Commission and Fngineer's request for the installation of the bike trail along Old
Crystal Bay Road. Weckman recommends that primarv drainfield sites for Lots 2 and 3. Block
1 be moved 5’ east in order to allow adequate separation from trail.
Roads
Review preliminarv plans. Countryside Drive shall be extended to Old Crystal Bay Road
per the directives of the resolution. Once completed, the City will assume the maintenance of
road when older portions have been reviewed and upgraded if necessarv . Directives ot the
resolution granting approval of Countiy side Manor were repeated again in the Findings and
conditions 'of the resolution that granted approval of Countryside Second Addition. The
developed propenies within Countiy side subdivision have been served by the public road but
maintained bv the private propeny owners. Developer has advised that the neighbors who
attended infomiation meeting held Januarv 12 voiced major concern with the tact that this road
would be a through road. They plan to petition the City to allow cul-de-sac to remain with a
cul-de-sac to the west and a future connection corridor planed as an outlot. It was always the
full intent of the Citv to create a public road connecting Willow and Old Cty stal Bay Road. The
Citv Engineer asks if Manor Circle should be extended northward connecting with second phase
cul-de-sac road to nonh. He also asks if there should be a north/south connection linking one
of the plat roads to Watertown Road. The Engineer notes that continuation ot these streets is
necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effectiveness of fire protection, prompt access for
emergency vehicles and efficient provision of City services such as snow removal.
As for the Coffin property, two cul-de-sac roads are shown at approximately 1300’ in
length serving 9 lots each. The Engineer appears to concur that the location ot the numwous
wetlands on the property poses a problem locating a logical connection tor the street These
roadways would not m'eet the standards for a public road. Revh:w applicant s addendum
Exhibit B. He notes the following reasons why a loop road would have a major impact on this
property:
1. Narrow land corridor between west property line and location of designated
wetland.
2. Roads would be located to the rear of Cygnet Place lots that are already limited
in depth.
Zoning File #1901
Januar>’ 14. 1994
Page 8 of 9
3. Location of existing drainageway that drains to the west to Cygnet propert>'.
4. Location of major area of trees providing screening for existing development to
west and natural amenities for future development of property.
5.Road would also negate several septic test areas where property is severely
limited by steep slopes and gentle sloped areas for the iastallation of mound.
1.
Options of Action
Anv formal action of the Planning Commission will be dependant upon the City
Engineer ’s review comments on drainage plan, the concepmal approval of wetlands mitigation
plan bv Corps of Engineers and MCWD for first phase subdivision and preliminary approval by
the Wkershed District of the preliminar>’ grading and drainage plan. It should also noted that
if the DNR disapproves of the retention areas adjacent to the Luce Line on the Coffin property,
that staff may have to call for the tabling of the application until other retention areas are located
on the site.
Any condition of approval of this subdivision must include the following conditions:
Dedication of plat road within first phase of Dickey parcel subdivision as public
road. Note 66 ’ of Old Crystal Bay Road has been dedicated on both sides.
Dedications were completed for all roads adjacent to the Dickey parcel with the
Countiyside option. Cul-de-sac road on Coffin property shall be a private road.
City to obtain underlying road and utility easements.
Dedication of drainage and utility easements 5 ’ along all interior lot lines and 10
along the perimeter boundaries and adjacent to road right-of-ways.
Prior to any site improvements, erosion control as shown on preliminary grading
and drainage plans must be installed and maintained until natural groundcover is
restored.
Prior to site graJing improvements, all tested septic sites on die Cofftn propet^
must be fenced off. The following lots in the itrsi phase development ot the
Dickev propero- must be fenced off; Lots 1,2.3, 4, 5, 6, Block 1 and ^ts 3.
4 5 6 and 7. Block 2. Note Lots 13 and 14, Block 2 will be fenced off at t e
time'of the approval of the second phase construction for the interior plat road.
Drainftelds to be moved 5 ’ to east within Lots 1 and 3. Block 1 to allow for
adequate separation tor bike trail.
3.
4.
8.
9.
Zoning File #1901 January 14, 1994 Page 9 of 9
6. Well pit must be sealed within Lot 2, Block 2 of the Dickey property'.
7. The following lots have been found to contain effective wetland areas not
designated on the City’s conservation area maps.
Dickey parcel. Lot 2, Block 1 - Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, Block 2; Coffin
property' - Lots 1, 5. 6, and 10. Once again, designated wetlands
of the City shall be shown as drainage easements on the plat.
There are no designated wetlands within the Dickey property but
within the first phase of the Coffin property. Lots 1 and 2. 7. 8
and 9 are involved with the designated wetland.
Developer shall create covenants to be filed on the Chain of Title of these
properties advising fumre owners of the limitations on the use of these areas and
the need to first apply to the Corps of Engineers and the Watershed District it any
improvements are proposed at some future date before obtaining the necessary
permits from the City.
Developer to install bike trail along Old Crystal Bay Road.
If no historical significance is found within area of the proposed park outlot,
applicant may have the option to convert park land to residential lot. The Park
Commission has not asked for a park dedication. In addition, if interior trails are
to be developed, said trail areas must be e.xcluded from dry buildable of
residential lots. Park dedication fee will be dependent upon outcome of park land
dedication and whether funds expended on bike trail will be credited against the
park dedication fee.
Readjustment of Lot 3, Block 1. Dickey parcel, so that 200 ’ is met to rear of 50 ’
front street setback.
r r ^* •» * W ? t ^ Ci r . sJ 4L
PH6NEN0.M STATE OFj^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES'^
METRO waters “ 12 00 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106
772-7910 F.LEN0
February 17, 1994
Hs. Jeanne Mabusth
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
RE; TANDEM PROPERTIES, COFFIN/DICKEY SITE, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN
COUNTY
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
We are writing to follow up on the February 3, 1994 naating with
city staff, reprefientatlves of Tandem Properties and DNR staff.
I'd like to summarize our understanding of the agreements that were
made and concerns that were noted.
Coffin Pro> erty - Most of the discussion focussed on the Coffin
Property;
Since the existing ditch along the Luce Line and the existing
18” culvert through the Luce Line already are inadequate for
conveying runoff under existing conditions, the DNR ie
concerned about making a bad situation worse. Therefore, it
was agreed that Tandem Properties would be responsible for;
a. cleantng/upgrading the existing ditch that runs along the
Luce Line,
b. replacing the existing 18” culvert, which is in
disrepair, with a new/upgraded 24” culvert, and
c. placing a new culvert under the horse trail in the area
by the pond (at the east end of the property).
The city has concerns about the potential impacts of the
proposed development on the Ryerse property. Some type of
emergency overflow is required for handling flood flows in
case the lower culvert through the Luce Line is plugged.
a. DNR staff agreed to allowing a second, higher culvert
through the Luce Line to act as an overflow.
b. DNR staff also agreed to consider minimal lowering of the
elevation of the Luce Line at this location, provided;
the slope in the graded area is no greater than one
percent, DNR Trails & Waterways staff has an opportunity
to review and approve the detailed plans, and the surface
of the trail is restored. As noted during the meeting,
any proposed change in grade should be kept to a minimum
in order to avoid creating maintenance problems on the
trail.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
/Ms.-Jeanne Mabusth February 16, 1994 Page 2
r^KTTj 'Tv*Ale & Waterways remains concerned about the iopacte of
’ ■ "tur ld“ not “rf "to %c.
raauirements for any future maintenance adjacent the Luca Line
In^thrSeve^opment^'L Association Agreement ftp'll
see an indication that the city was willing to °OMit to
workino with the DNR on future maintenance. However,
T«aui lontinues to be a concern and we hope to aee greater
^operation between the DNR and City of
this and other similar sites that have, or will, affect tne
Luce Line.
construction taking* placo#
Thank YOU for your assistance in arranging a forum
sincerely,
Ceil Strausa
Area Hydrologist
c: Martha Reger, DNR Trails & Waterways
Del Barber, DNR Trails & Waterways
Kim Waldorf, DNR Regional Engineer assoc 1
Shawn Gustafson, City Engineer (Bonestroo and Assoc.)
Dick Putnam, Tandem properties
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
:>
Orono Planning Commission Members
Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers
Ron Moorse. City Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator
February 14. 1994
#1902 Dan R. Guenlhner, 120 Golden View Drive - Conditional Use Permit ■
Public Hearing
Zoning District: RR-IB. Rural Residential Zoned Lands
Total Area = 6.6+ acres
Pertinent Ordinances
1. Section 10.28. Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for temporary
greenhouse to be installed March 25 - June 15 on John Hallson property located at 120
Golden View Drive.
2. Section 10.20. Subdivision 3 (L) - Farms (crop and stock). Conditional use permit
required if ten acres oi more. Applicant proposes 3.5 acres. No conditional use permit
required.
3. Section 10.02, Definitions.
71 - Use
72 - Use-Accessory
73 - Use-Conditional
74 - Use Permined
75 - Use-Principal
4. Section 10.03. Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessor)' structures in excess of 750 s.f. footprint
area but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. shall be located 15’ from any lot line. The proposed
greenhouse is 840 s.f. Review Exhibit H, note structure has been placed behind
principal structure and meets minimum 15’ setback from all other lot lines.
5. Section 10.20. Subdivision 4 (G) - Roadside stands. Sale of produce grown on site is
allowed, subject to meeting required standards of code. Any approved access to property
is via private road. Golden View’ Drive.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Addendum
C - Plat Map
D - Property Owners List
E-1-2 Newspaper Articles
I 4 Zoning File #1902
Februar)' 14, 1994
Page 2
F - Resolution No. 3098 - Granting Approval of Temporary Greenhouse in 1992 at
Dickey Property Located at 2645 Watenown Road
G - Septic Inventory Plan
H - Survey/Site Plan
Description of Request
Applicant seeks approval of a temporary greenhouse to be installed at the John Hallson
property at 120 Golden View Drive immediately nonh of the Dickey property where a
greenhouse has been installed for the past two seasons (1992/1993). 'Fhe Dickey property is
currently being considered for suWivisitin and property is no longer being otfered to Mr.
Guenthner for planting of crops.
The structure is proposed at 14 ’ x 60 ’ and at a maximum 10 height and shall be
constructed as previously approved of 6mm poly material tacked to wooden perlon structure.
As before, the structure must satisfy the building code standards for a temporarv' greenhouse.
Applicant proposes the planting of approximately a 3.5 acre field. As before, major portions
of the crop will be sold to various markets and restaurants and a smaller percentage to member
families considered share holders. To the City ’s knowledge, produce has never been sold
directly at the Dickey site although code would allow the selling ot produce grown at the site
as an accessory use.
Although the conditional use permit application notes only the use of the Hallson
property, Mr. Guenthner has advised in a recent phone conversation that he may use a small
portion of the Suess property on the west side. Staff advised the applicant of the limiiation.s now
on the use of the Suess property because this property is currently under subdivision review.
Septic testing has been completed for all proposed lots. If Planning Commission members can
recall, original septic testing completed for proposed Lot 3 was negated because ot trucks
driving over septic area. Suess had to provide additional septic testing tor Lot 3. Expansion
to the Suess property may no longer be an option.
The Dickey crop operation was located to the mid/norih of the 66 acre undeveloped
property. The Hallson property is surrounded by two acre development to the west, north and
south. There are certain activities and odors that emanate through care and maintenance of
vegetable crops that may prove to be incompatible with adjacent neighborhood. Applicant
should provide more detail on his operation.
Issues for Consideration
1.The code does not limit the number of conditional uses or permitted uses on a given
property. A conditional use permit is not like an accessory use where accessory use must
be subordinate or supportive of principal use. A conditional use can be independent trom
Zoning File #1902
February 14, 1994
Page 3
3.
4.
5.
. ■ , - The code does not appear to limit the number of uses perniiiied or
the pnncipal use. on^Vallows a conditional use permit for crop use
“^i’re^eeTra^rX Is*is"« tntense a use of the 6.5 acre residential lot.-
Should a property c^ntly -«;visio„
planting of crops? If septic areas Vtere P
-at is the opinion of the
Planning Commission?
c wwt r The existing septic svstem is to the immediate west with an alternate Review Exhibit G. The existing p garage.
site shown to the immediate north. Mr. Hallson has noted
somewhere in the area of the proposed It may be to Mr.
an interest in subdividing his property ^ equipment compacts area
- «■“ -■
consider the Dicltey and the H^Hson pro,.rtic^ is
ereenhouse.' Will the 3.5 acre planting area be a^quaic lo ip
additional acreage is not available at the Suess property.
Resolution No. 3098 that granted appmval of the-ict^or^iy- gmen^use on the_Diche^
“s^uuls c—'use permit ^ limited for a specified timel Should the
conditional use permit be renewed each year.
Options of Action
recemmendation of approval must include the following conditions;
installed to meet all required standards of the State Building and
Any
1.Structure shall be
Fire Codes.
3.
Use of stmemre shall be limited to the specific period March 25 - June 15.
When structure is taken down, s.mcute must be removed immediately from site
and not stored on 6.5 acre parcel.
Zoning File #1902
February H, 1994
Pace 4
nf nmrertv of potential of eliminating suitable septic areas on
4, of the us“ of heavv equipment compacting soils. Existing and
staged pri^r t'o Uac .ns.aUa.ion of greenhouse or any
other land alterations.
OR
Denial If Planning Conrnrission nrembers recommend denial, please refer to the
necessa^ rntdings in Section 10.09. Subdivision 6 (A).
i
4^ I ^ ' ^ __ClT‘i OP CRONO - CP^iSSAI. ) yPROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address
Property Identification tiunber (P.l.D.)
4 V
• •
rrrv r*rUX t 9 Wfl w*f %V.«»»V
C T*‘ • iii“C *jT 1- T*‘'vI Aitrvvtw^ » Aw^
f T^.'V -fVsV**.>X Vti. vw^rv
1 J to acolicaticn if not iRcludgd... 'T'Please attach legal descriowion to a^^u , ^
on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
------------------------------------------- Phone (home) .wa^
applicant
Phone (work)
City fy^pls.Sip ^^oC»
OWNER (if differe.nt than applicant)
Ilar.e )-fAuc-5gN
Phone (hone) H~7S'^
Phone
Address QlLi
Citv Ow'O^’lo Cip ^5^56
. , (cionth/year)
I^?do^"?do*notT^also own f_ _ _ _
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
w w-'th CUP application$ 50.00 For each va-ranc*. request -
$125.00 Residential accessory Use
$175.00 Institutional (churchy schools etc.)
$150.00 Guest Eouse/Guest Apartarents
$150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 Ccprtercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 Land Alteration
ss ;:i isi“s-v.;‘5“S;i SK=.'7I!;L.Grading, aeawall, retaining walls within ,5
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from
y?eJ-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee
OTHER APPLICATIONS oi;,n Review {+ consultant fees)$200.00 Conanercial Site Plan Review v*r
$250.00 Vacation
$175.00 Easement Vacation .
s 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
5300.00 Rezoning (POD — refer to fee s
$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
$100.00 Appeals
” Other “ see fee schedule
ccrrc
} I
vV vr
.-. -. f -
i\\/X I
’ S (o
PRESENT DSB OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning DistrictPresent Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTi^^ribe request in detail:
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
3L.. Completed Application Form. . ^ owners within 350' (vou can obta.
0-^ thH^^st f^^rEinVeprrcounty Department of Finance A-603 Governme:
'' Center 348-3271).
. °?Li*sa»s«5™ _
not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Ce«ifIcatIorbrci«icarDepI"_nent that Land Use Application is complete.
Initials of Clerical Staff;
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 4 n'on -eauired or
is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's signature Date /-2^:271
OWNERS SIGNATUREuwniuu9 ijxvitirsj.a.v,*.. 1 i r.a 1 nn and further
The owner hereby acknowledges J?? staVf° consultants,
authorized reasonable entry onto the property J , ourposes of
agents, commission members, and Councxl member P
investigation and verification of this request,
owner's signature \
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present a aopiicant is
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If have an
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, & Zoning
authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Builai g
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
Jaiiuar>’ 26, 1994 4J. 77Jeanne A. MabusthBuilding and Zoning Atininistrator
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
Dear Jeanne,
Enclosed you will find a conditional use permit aoplicaticn for
relocating mv temporary greenhouse to the Jotm Hal Ison property
at 120 Golden View Drive, As you are well aware I liave been track
faming in the city of Orono for the past three years, renting
property from Pat Dickey, Bob Suess and now Jonn riallson.
The previous three seasons mv greenhouse has been erected on
Pat Dickey's land at 2645 Watertown road. As in previous years,
I ^n.11 need to use a small greenhouse structure to help start
transplants for the spring. I would like to continue the same
arrangement with the 14 X 60 foot structure to be assanbled the
25th of march and disassembled on or before the 15th of June.
Enclosed you will find a map with a more detailed discription of
the proposed location of the greenhouse.
Thank Ycxi for your consideration of the proposal.
Sincerely,
Dan R. Guenthner
Cotimon Harvest Farm
Local, Organic frsh-market vegetables
^ RUN om 01/24/94 V r^BATCH OOSi-.I ->PROP AOOR V , 0»««R NAH6.; ' TAXPAYER.• , ' : MAME/ADOR'w'’ *t(tI'PROP ADDR 0»t«R NAME . . ' TAXPAYER ^ MAME/ADOR• ' ■'■ f'V. Vi •16 04-117-2S 12 0007 02445 HATERTOMN RO PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2445 HATERTOHN RD LONG LAKE ft4 55S545« 35-118-25 42 000702730 SILVER VIEW OR R A A C A SWANSON ROGER A A CAROL A SWANSON 2750 SILVER VIEW DR LONG LAKE MN 55354•-»HEftCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0W«R3 LIST38 33-118-23 41 000802565 WOOOHAVEN OR NAM BASHORE NEAL K A MARY 0 BASHORE 2545 WOOOHAVEN DR LONG LAKE Tt4 5535438 33-118-23 42 000802680 SILVER VIEW OR SPEAK THE WORD CHURCH SPEAK THE WORD CHURCH 515 JERSEY AVE S GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426. ; ;.V PROP ADDR OWNER NAME V TAXPAYERSi''*.' NAME/ADDR• y- r A.> . %
'f'v. ‘■
38 33-118-23 42 0011. 02715 SILVER VIEW OR 0 0 PETERSON A K L PETERSON DONOVAN 0 A KAREN L PETERSON 2715 SILVER VIEW DR LONG LAKE MN 55354
i ?
PROP *00R
' ■ ; OWNER NAME
^38 33-118-23 43 0005
' 00120 GOLDEN VIEW DR
, JOHN HALLSON
r*»
TAXPAYER ■ JOHN T HALLSON
■i’- ■NAME/ADDR P 0 BOX 171
’j LONG LAKE MN 55356
rV-S..% •
' * * V
' i.,
■38 33-118-23 43 0011
“it*,r ' •: •
PROP AOOR . 00055 GOLDEN VIEW OR
0I«4ER NAME VO A N L ERICKSON
TAXPAYER VAN D A NANCY L ERICKSON
• * *4 NAME/ADDR 55 GOLDEN VIEW DR
* -W •:V
f
LONG LAKE m 55356
>\ . . v‘‘J' .
f -.
Mi ' •••
^"•'V'-’' ■ 'v'se' 33-
W. iPROP AOOR
SV OWNER NAME
taxpayer
. ^ ; NAME/AODR
■L-.
118-23 43 0014 •
00155 GOLDEN VIEW DR'da smith a a e gold-smith
DOUGLAS A SMITH
155 GOLDEN VIEW OR
1^ LONG LAKE MN 55356*
'• V
.f:«I*;J•
38 33-118-23 42 001202475 SILVER VIEW OR T W ISAACS A R ISAACS THOMAS W A ROSALYNOA ISAACS 2675 SILVER VIEW DR LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 33-118-23 43 0009
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
J F A M C P VOGT ET AL
GVO HA
85 GOLDEN VIEW DR
LONG LAKE. MN 55356
38 33-118-23 43 0012
00085 GOLDEN VIEW DR
M A A HILBELIFK
MICHAEL J HILBELINK
85 GOLDEN VIEW DR
LONG LAKE MN 55354
38 33-118-23 43 0015
00175 GOLDEN ’LL' - DR
L A J STRAND
LYW H STRAND
175 GOLDEN VII.. J.i
LONG LAKE MN 55354 :
' i
REPORT NO. PAGE58 53-118-23 41 0014 .02525 NOODHAVEN OR C J O'CONNOR A L S O'COtlOR CHRISTOPHER J O'CONNOR AND LYl«ni S 0'C0»t«R 2525 HOOOHAVEN LONG LAKE MN 55554 P14S5481MO ,IP >|t I -t'hf. ; ■ *■*mV vys ^'-438 33-118-23 42 0009 02650 SILVER VIEW OR < J V A 0 H CROTTEAU JOHN V A DONNA M CROTTEAU 2450 SILVERVIEH DRIVE ORONO MN 5535438 33-118-23 43 000402660 WATERTOWN RO T P GORMAN ALT GORMAN T P A L T GORMAN 2640 WATERTOWN RD S V LONG LAKE MN 55354
'•f
4-• 'S'.*'\ '•^1N•4■n i • W ,?!'n-.mffv.'
38 <55-118-23 43 0010 ;
00035 GOLDEN VIEW DR
HAL CHORLEY
MICHAEL E A LUCINDA CHORLEY
55 GOLDEN VIEW DR
LONG LAKE MN 55554
38 33-118-23 43 0013
00125 GOLDEN .VIEW
JAMES C A CARRIE 0
JAMES A CARRIE HEYERDAHL
125 GOLDEN VIEW t)D
LONG LAKE MN 55354
T
,;m:. ‘-5;
HEYERDAHL f
ROAHL < M'VM
r r ^ff
38 53-118-23 43 0014 ,
00038 ADDRESS imSSlGNEO *IJiv
LILLIAN B PETERMAN ET AL : , «
TAXPAYER TO LET FORFEIT ^rv:i^' .V ',’J
k
m
1
U
.V
)JPi
r-ii.
V;--j ;> H. •' ■• .* •f^- 'RUN DATE Ol/ZA/K v ‘ • *( • •■ ,.* .V; ! ^ V‘ *BATCH OOS i/PROP ADDR ka 3S-118-2S 44 0001 02590 HATERTOHN RO■ 0»#«R NAHE ROeEF.r f SUE5S ETAL,a; taxpayer ROBERT F SUESS ■»! iV NAME/AODR i 2590 HATERTOI^I ROuV'"-V LONG LAKE MN 55356. ■r\-I V“ • :.f VV • * • • ^ *V :v ‘ ' w^• 4 , S ’
• • ki' \ .. >' f V ' I
■' ':V. v "'.Vi'
t *f ^ I J'V ‘ K
. ... . . ., i. p y± ■•:■; »•
'. '• •. V- • ^-• ‘ • •»- “ /
.i_HEJPffPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OEMERS LIST
f'-. '^. V' ‘ ■ ■'■■'^'.'V*^'i*.'^ ‘ ••.'■•“
*. t •, f' .f** ' >v- • 4.. '/ t ' • • •
*?..•• *T ■ . j ■ * .; .A .
\ •
IV
58 33-118-23 44 000202590 HATERTOHN RD ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 2590 HATERTOHN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCHrIA/'•V
♦ /
#1.R S /’
REPORT NO. PiASSAoiii ““ .: ■»•ifDOS 00020 ’‘4t*rip.'-2 ■V'*■ ‘-t’ ■ ''M- J.* ^>;v!f.fc Sw-aT. < ■ ’ i' ^ - ' ' JBm5-‘ ‘•- Smm-.mi-fcsS&sfi:h* . . V * 7‘- • .‘T- ^ X•■••r' - .y j. IV, , f .* ‘IV ^iia' ?i.i*)3yy-.'*jSK«‘^y4 mi^V. '1’ ■ r.7k f 1
•-'i mm:
\
. ‘‘: ‘V.»■ ' • V'
fei4
1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HEfWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERS TAXATION, TO/WE BEST.
OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF.
M
V
»*• •*
5W ’-
I • % ^ 44 ■ * St:
*‘‘r ‘M
'1
. •
it
r.4 - w.^'- ■• t^f*>f.,r tQ^inmuhity farms share an organic return to roots■" -wmm•.ijfi ' 4‘K m _i>Tvsr-: 1rasMia■>*ii^'i*
/ »
f -I
'%■
'■^-1.
V V
* v» %'„m
T<^'S »;
’’'T :'-♦^» ■
«' rT Staff Photo by Marlin Levison
* ./• Aj» -\.- » ^
w--'‘.. Dan Quenthner and Margaret Penninas, with a little help from Anne Guenthner, 6
' V^i’^^htha. watered organically grown plants, part of a community-supported farming
program, in a greenhouse near Long Lake.
By Karin WInegar/Staff Writerhere's still frost in the■ ground, but the frogs areB singing love songs in the■ ponds among the oaks at Red Cardinal Farm. David Washburn and Meg Anderson raise flowers, vegetables and berries on this 35- acre organic farm just east of Mahto-
medi. In a month or two. the hillside
behind the small green barn will
bloom with peonies, coral bells, as-
tiibes, scaoiosas, irises and coneflow-
ers. And the raspberry canes and
blueberry bushes will burst up
through the pine-needle mulch behind
the chicken coop that has been con
verted to an office.
This is Washburns' and Anderson's
third season as community shared
agriculture (CSA) farmers. They plan
to offer .TO fruit and vegetable
"shares " — customers pay $395 in
advance for 14 to 16 weeks of pro
duce. They also are selling 50 shares
FARMS continued on page 6E
V •
'^*1 '■•t » -» t
TJ •f ^
r
n/
Sii ii lii
lory Card«tiv
perrent of Um
r»7'
%4*
im ifiM
^ Vic-
ISd^thAi 40
By \Moey L CAftw
U\e Stevo Tite fmmily of Wayiau tat
down lo dinner and enjoyed new poU-
toes, oicumberf and an e|^;plant cas
serole, all vrgetablef picked the very day
they ale thera. But the Tales didn’t pr>w
the vegeubles in their backyard —they
don't have the space Nor did they buy
them at a roadside stand.
The fresh food on their uble came from
the Common Haf>efl Farm on Water-
town Rd. west of Long Lake. It was
plai/.ed. cultivated and cared for by their
farmer. Dao Guenthner. The Tates, who
have purchased a full share (providing
for a family of four) in the crops raised at
the Common Harvest Farm, will receive a
bag of fres h vegetables once a week for 20
weeks. They are one of 85 hous eholds in
Minneapolis who refer to Dan Guenth-
iier as “our farmer.”
Sixieen other subscriber famiiies re-
f ide in the readership area of this news
paper. and they are ail beginning lo think
abot ’t the food they eat m a different way
Thev want to support a program that pro*
mises thera fresher food than they could
b’ly at any market, at lower pntes. and
they want to know the food has been
raised organically and locally.
Many of the families strongly feel the
need to be involved in the production of
the food by going to the fields to see what
is helping pick and pack their
produce, and personally supporting their
farmer and hia staff of five They want
more 'nan a ’•subtle connection'* to their
environment » •• • ,r
Although the Common Harv est Farm is
the only one in this area (the closest
similar farm is in Osceola Wisconsin).
Lhe idea of a subsenber farrii not new
Japan and Switzerland have been doing
this form of agnculture for years. Thirty
years ago in Japan, concerned citizens
formed " buying groups.** went directly to
a farmer, and used this interesting ap
proach to consumensm that is new hrp-
pemng at Har\esi Farm.
Here in the Umied Suies. this t>T)e t f
farm is very prevalent m the northeast
ern states, where it first began Now it's
cropping up on the west coast where
Caiifomians refer to the food raised as
"yuppy chow.”
Farmer Guenthner feels that here m
^^Kihng WoiM Wiint'came'frn those
NtmneioU. ■ nch the G^tJen.. -Me beUevea
avenge penon i*«oiri|ilHiai^«Mwved ;2|j,ble of
trom the food growing procHgPHKiiof 5Bt<e« totloioanh^ ifwepcwene
thefoodMinnesounseatispagducetlOut Ubd for Ibod product*|«.
of sulev.«d the let^ce yot. j .. u,,
> that- has
grocery
hands six uroea before yog piitjl in yoBff ^ ^ Comm o n Harvest Faqig
TbiTbr.tlir^ti
piM m yotttf^4 ^ ^refngenilor. 411^ i Seen its lubscnbert double In number,
“Thaf 8 average for a piece of pirpdiscc;* ^ [ with 100 people tunied away as ^tential
said Guenthner, “and the sam||MJnie/a^ * custpmeraa Asked if bd planned to e*-
food produced here vnthiO;th?lbdwt »od put more of the
jus|^ travels a shorter distance h1 1 *JjjjjK, i?**^** Watertown Rd. into vegeiablet
thdae aia sets of hands.” -pert teaeoiv OuenthM said ^ does
plan to''cultivate and^lant more of theWhat Guenthner says he is really try
ing lo establish at the Common Harvest
Farm is relauons hips—the relationship
of people to land, people to food, and
people to the food of the land. As Maggie
Michaelson. coordinator of the weekljr
food packing and diMnbution. explamt
IS hard for people to get involved os
be concerned about their environment if
NtST
they have no connecung link.** She feels
this chance to see what goes into the
^wtng process —the work In planting
and harvesting the dependence on the
weather, the sharuigof the bounty —will
provide them that Unlt^ge
“There are a lot of closet gardeners out
there.” Michaelson believes, people who
dream of so.meday having that piece of
land and growing their own food. They
don ’t realue they can have that now. if not
in their own backyard, then somewhere
else, if they wnll lake the drae to gel in
volved in the process.
“Were not that far away from our
roou,” said Michaelson, "or those days
when our grandparents raised most of
their own food.”
VMien 1 related that my grandparents
To Page 17
i ^ ' •• •
subscriber list, .w i
But Guenthner believes in toe “econo
mics of scale ” He would rather see sex'-
eral other small subsenpuon farms start
up than to make hia own much bigger.
By keeping the farm small brogue and
limiting the number of subscribers he
serves, Guenthner and Michaelson see a
chance to make tura^ifs not^yuppy
chow ” they arf growing They want their
subsenbers to be participanta, not spec
tators. About 25 percent of the sub-
tenbera how com e our to the fftm and
help. They would like to raise that per
centagCL They want to make the farm a
gaihenrg place (or Sunday picnics or
work-day pollucks. They had one such
gathering in June and hope to have more
soon. ^
Michaelsoa wpukf flie to see a child
ren’s plot plantodiMdii^ac.where kids
could have a pa|tg|t crops
'such as gourdC'i^uspkiiir^lmd Indian
com. Guenthner envisions^ •demon
stration gardes^** where folks could learn
how to plant their own backyard ploU,
f omethuig ho encourages hia subsenb-
ers to do so they dpp’tget hooked on toe
^ rii let rav farmer do it all for me” idea
About 20 different vegeUble# are
grown at Common Harvest rami,”ahd
each week 85 bags of fresh produce are
picked up at the .six drop-off points by the
subsenber families. Each family sends a
cloth reusable bag with their name on it
to the farm where it is filled by helpers
with whaujver produce is available at
that Ume Recently, it was summer
squish, potatoes, cucumbers, onions,
green peppers, eggplant and cabbage.
Meanwhile. 17 families in the Lake
Minnetonka area who have decided they
v%'antto ”get back to the basics ” and relate
to the land and the food they eat. are
expenencing what it is to be p rt of a
"new economic model ” as Michatison
puts it—the Common Harvest Farm.
r
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3098
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDTIONAL USB PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 3A
PILE #1723
WHEREAS, Patricia C. Dickey (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of property located at 2645 Watertown Road located within
the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract
A, RLS 1089 and Outlet A, Countryside Manor, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, (hereinafter "property"), and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for
a Conditional Use Permit to permit the temporary use of a greenhouse
for a four month period each year per Municipal Zoning Code 10.28,
Subdivision 3A,
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1.
2.
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1723.
The property is located in the RR-IB, Rural Residential
Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The subject
property consists of 64 acres.
3.On March 16, 1992 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the
application and recommended approval of the application as
proposed based on the following findings;
a)The structure shall be in use no more than three months
out of the year.
The temporary greenhouse structure shall be located on
the 64 acre site so as not to impact the views of
adjacent residential owners.
c)When not in use the structure is taken down and the
parts stored in a wooded or screened section of the
property.
Page 1 of 6
r
o* o CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO 3093
The temoorary accessory structure shall meet all
required setbacks of the RR-IB Zoning District and for
oversized accessory structures.
The City Council finds that granting a conditional use
permit to allow the temporary installation of a greenhouse
Safety oS^'SeneVa^l wSlLre^ of^She^Vublic?^wo^^ not Adversely
oroperty values and that the proposed level of use of the
prooerty will be in keeping with the intent and objectives
of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5.The Citv Council has considered this application including
the findinos and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
e”fe°ct ce^^he prVpos%"d u™"t\=e Welfare
of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Perniit per Municipal
code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3A \°
1.The temporary greenhouse shall be installed on
f-u"c^u%%^%i;ri’'l = srred"°’n se^iuL^d
wooded area of the property.
2.The temporary use of the property is approved ba
site plan included as page 6 of this resolution. Any
intensification in use shall require submission of a
conditional use permit by applicant and owner.
Page 2 of 6
o CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3098
3.The applicant and owner, Patricia C. Dickey, shall be
responsible for all activities approved under the
conditional use permit for the use of Common Harvest
Community Farm. Direct sale of the produce grown on this
property has not been approved with this current conditional
use permit.
4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation
of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any
authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
5.The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself,
her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to^ the
recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
1992.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of March,
ATTOST:
'^Dol-othyf'MT| Hallirf, City Clerk
■ (^ /
Property Owner(s)
Dan Guenthner, Authorized Agent
of Common Harvest Community Farm
Page 3 of 6
i *
r
<2V/
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.3098
STATE OF MINKESOTA
COUNTY OP HENNEPIN
On this r-y*'C/-/'K
)
) ss.
^"4i-u- - -5-rrr-‘*tit^in and ^or'said county, personallybefore me e Notap Public within .......-----------------,
appeared —~^7\ H.a«;rrTbed in and wno executed the
known to me to be edged that he (they) executedforegoing instrument, and ,thrsame as his (their) free act and deed.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
^30'^'
On y
Notary Publxc
) ss.\
CAR0l£ A. HASEMAN
POTAffr PUtUO-MtMCWTA
HENNEPM COUNTy
WY (XMMISSCN EXMCa MMi
---------- - ----------------wee*
199
Not^y Public
g JAMIE LB0S^M
l^nJW IWUCHaWMBOTA
My Cooaa. Ew w
Page 5 of 6
\ •
. f
low Dri
ft'
V'
%
C ~ CONFOHMI
y ^
Hh;m
SITE COPY Irr 11 f ic«li» of Survey
for JoHii T. Hitlu^
of lot 2, BlocI I, Islilrs
Hr^nniin County. Mlimosoti
nr?*icfoV^
* V r
/•>>?? • ^li %
IS'^ 60' T«A|» MwSc-
, CITYOFORONO
SITE PLAN __ GRADING PLAN
TTjippPOVFn
Vj JkPPROVWi WUH PitVKjlON'j
DATE.u -1^1
tfp
l\f\e\eby certify tiiat tins is a true and correct
resentatlon of a survey of llie boundaries of
Lot 2, Block I, Hail son Estates, and the proposed
location of tv.o proposed buildings. It does not
purport to sliow any other Improvefnents or en-
croaclmients.
-COFFIN ft GKUfIBtUG. INC.
MorK 5. Gionbcrg Mn.“11cT*No. 127S5
Engineers. Uind Surveyors, Plarrners
Long Lake. Minrresota
lUite : 6-8-0/
Scale: T = 100'
0 : Iron marker
C?t.*J : Spot elevation
Datum: Assumed
CD
O
) ‘ill V •r.-pj. M mm
%
■/ouu^
NGPLAN
lU
ie and correct
)oundarles of
id t|ie proposed
. It does not
Bnts or en-
CO___^
.1
I •
. I
• ll , I
•li .
, I
I
f.
I
ll <
• '*1
I I
h *
9 .f*
^1*: !l
TO:Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE:February 14, 1994
SUBJECT: #1904 Eric and Shelly Liljequist, 3490 Birchi Lane - Variances - Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B)
A. Area
Required
Existing
Variance
21,780 s.f. or 1/2 acre
13,894 s.f. or .32 acre
7,886 s.f. or .18 acre
B.Lot width
Required = 100’
Existing at 929.4 elevation
Variance = 57 ’ or 57%
= 43’; at 75 ’ setback = CO’
Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover
A. 0-75 ’ setback area = 3,918 s.f.
Existing = 0
Proposed = 0
75-250 ’ setback area = 9,976 s.f.
Allowed = 2.494 s.f. or 25%
Existing = 2,023 s.f. or 20.28%
Proposed = 2,194 s.t. or 21.9%
No variance required
On June 14, 1993 applicants received approval of a street setback variance tor a 24 ’ x 24 ’
detached garage within street yard of lakeshore yard.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Propertv' Owners List
C - Plat Map
D - Proposed Site Plan
E - 1-2 Floor P’ans
F - 1-2 Elevation
Zoning File #1904 February 14, 1994 Paee 2 G - Hardcover Inventory H - Survey I - Resolution #3288Description of Request
Applicants propose removal of the existing residence and construction of a new residence with
a 34 ’x34 ’ footprint at 1,156 s.f. Please review the hardcover facts. Exhibit G and existing
survey. Exhibit H. Hardcover is proposed at 2.194 s.f. or 21.95^. Applicants have 300
additional s.f. to allow for stairs, deck or sidewaik. Applicants require no other variances to
reconstruct residence as all required yard setbacks are met including the average lakeshore
setback, revievt Exhibit H. There is adequate room for applicants to install a deck at lakeshore
side where patio doors are shown. Hardcover facts must include steps leading from street side
porch as shown in elevation.
Issues for Consideration
Should the City continue its policy of requiring area or lot width variances where no other
variances are required at the time an existing residence is removed and a new residence
constructed? For she benefit of the applicants, can we review some of the reasons wh:' the City
would require th»s variant- review'. Staff has advised the applicants, that when the residence
is removed, the lot is then considered as an undeveloped lot and subject tc current lot standards.
Any condition of approval must include recognition of the proposed hardcover at 2.194 s.f. and
that applicants are allowed 300 s.f. of additional improvements for steps, deck or sidewalk.
r V
• -^1
J ^ k
CITY OF ORONO - V.\RIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $200.00 _
($50.00 per each additional variance) mJJ„
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 •
(no change from original application) / /
Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00
After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
I “
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address 3490 BIRCH LANE
Piooertv Identification Number (P.I.D.)_____■f)8-117-?i) 43 QQ.0.2.
f' 7 T^v r'Lilt w* Lnuito
>ccTrc
itmtwi- Uf I 4 W‘W
^ w • vv
Attach 'legal description to application if not included on required sui^ey.
Date Propertv' Acquired-------- 08/28/92 ------------------------------ -.-v-. .-wi
I adjacent parcels of land. vr^r'"
Present use of property: j^residential -----other (specify)--------------------- x ■ -
Zoning District;^----------------------------------------------------- 01/2S/94
applicant
Name Frio r T.ilipguisE
Address:^aon Bii-r-h i.p.nt>---------------
Phone iFnme) 7/471-725^
P'uone(work) 612/ 8 71d51Q-Q-
____^Zip:.Si22.l-Citv: flrono____
0\\'NER (if different than applicant)
Name_____________________
Phoneihome)
Phone twork)_
Address;Citv:
DESCRIPTION OF REQLT:ST Estimated Construction Cost
Describe request in detail; variance-Lor nov home con
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQLIRED
Y Lot Area _
Setback:
Lot Width
Front __Side
Hardcover Lot Coverage
Rear Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
HARDSHIP/DESCRl^ON O^^^^ uL^sIafFoperty conditions preventing
.^ompl^^^^^^^^^^ Zoning Code requirenient5;_jia^d^o_|C^^
additional sheets if necessary)
‘A
1
4m
3
4,
REQUIRED SI B.MITT.\LS
Alj of the fonowijig.jnfonTiatJon rnust b€ submitted hv the application deadline date in order
for your application to be considerpd complete:
X Completed Application Form
Certitied Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5271).
X ‘^^3p (obtained with property owners list).
-X Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/%" x 11" for
reproduction.
X Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Vi" ,x 11" for reproduction.
X Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11").
SMt legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
__As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
__Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The Applicant ar-d Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vonr
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT S SIGNATLTiE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
inform.ition supplied is true and correct to the best of h'S/her knowledge.
Applicant’s Signature /■:Wa-7/
OWNER’S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further autliorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation an^ verification of this request.
Owner ’s Date 2'^ ^
Applicant must have all submittals into theKTity offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
.Meeting. Planning Commission .Meetings are held on the third Monday of each ..vonth.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission
and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements
to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of
this change prior to the meeting.
• •*mW OATI 04/U/93 BATCH 001 ■ Q?PROt> ADDR OHNEH NAME TA>0>AyER name /ADDS
• /
i>RQO AOOH
OIMER NAME
Taxpayer
NAHE/AODR
PROP AOOR
OI«IER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAHE/AODR
•I
PROP AOOR
ONNER NAME
TAXPAYER
•- NAME/ADOR
• i .
PROP AOOR
ONNER NAME
• TAXPAYER
{ ■'■ . nahe/addr
SB 08-117-25 45 0001 05470 J8IRCH LA REX EUCEf« OOLIINGER JR REX EUGENE BOLLINGER JR 5470 BIRCH LA NAYZATA LM 5SS91
SO OB-117-25 45 0004
01444 BALOUR PARK RO
VIOLET OEROSIA
VIOLET DEROSIA
1444 BALDUR PARK RO
HAYZATA MN 55591
38 08-117-25 45 0008
05510 NORtH SHORE OR
D > J SIKKA
OALJir A JASHINDER SIKKA
351C rJORTH SHRE DR
HAVZATA Ml S5591
58 08-117-25 45 0015
05480 NORTH SHORE DR
BRUCE A NUSDAUH
BRUCE A NUSOAUM
5480 NORTH SHORE DR
NAYZATA htl 55591
58 08-117-25 45 0025
05450 BIRCH LA
E R ENGLER • B ENGUR
EOHARD R t BOttllE ENCLER
5450 DIRCII LA
HAYZATA HN 55591
I
• V
, PROP ADDR
V ONNER NAME •'
••■...TAXPAYER •
NAHE/ADDR
* <-1 /« ..NAYZATA MN
t ‘
1 ., •:1
.
1 • I
•A ■* . • • ............... * .
I
58 08-117-25 45 0027
05440 BIRCH LA
R NlLlIAH TONARD ETAL
R NILLIAH TONARD
5440 BIRCH LA
55591
* i • *- r
HEUIEPIfl COUNTY PROPERTY IHTORMATIOI SYSTEH PROPERTY OltlERS LIST58 08-117-25 45 000205440 BIRCH LA E LILJEQUIST « S LILJCqUtSr ERIC J t SHELLY R LILJEQUIST 5490 BIRCH LA HAYZATA MN 55541
58 08-117-25 45 0005
01440 BALOUR PARK RO
R E EfIGEBRETSON ET AL
RICHARD E ENGEDRcISON
A JEAN ENGEBRETSOtl
1440 BALDUR PARK RO
HAYZATA Ttl 55541
58 08-117-25 45 0009
05520 NORTH SHORE DR
DAVID A SINGER
DAVID A STNGER
5520 NORTH SHORE OR
HAYZATA MN 55541
58 08-117-25 45 0014
05440 NORTH SHORE DR
KENTON M CARLSON ETAL
KENTON H CARLSON
3498 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
HAYZATA Ml 55591
38 08-117-25 45 0025
D54S8 NORTH SHORE OR
P E DOl'tlAM t 8 D DLADER
PAUL BOHMAN/BARBARA 0 BLAOER
5458 NORTH SHORE OR
HAYZATA Ml 55591
TOTAL BATCH 001 00016
REPORT MO. PAGE58 08 117-25 45 0005.01448 BALDimi PARR RO CORAL H LAURENCE CORAL H LAHRENCE 5120 lOTH AVE SO MPLS Ml 55417
58 08-117-25 45 000*
01456 BALDUR PARK RO
HAP NELSON
HALLACC E NELSON
6221 HASimURN AVE S
MPIS Ml 55425
58 08-117-25 45 0012
05470 NORTH SHORE DR
HAROlO J BROUELLETTE
HAROLD J BROUELLETTE
5470 NORTH SHORE OR
HAVZATA m 55591
58 08-117-25 45 0015
05448 NORTH SHORE DR
KAO CARLSON
KENTON H CARLSON
5448 NORTH SHORE DR
HAYZATA Ml 55591
58 08-117-23 43 0026
0541.0 NORTH SHORE DR
JOIRl C NELSON ETAL
JOHN NELSON
5460 NO SHORE DR
HAYZATA MN 55591
■ * '• *c I- ' v"
, 4*** ‘t •* - ' ' * f* * ' ‘ I ' • *».S * I
•• f
il:l!
Ill)
• .1
• .*• .,'••• *'•, * ■ -
I .. I ; - ■vr: r;
. • L .. . !
r
of
/n (9
( k . . « • • «»• -•»|«rmi ux 4. aioc* I n.^Kt^f ».<i Mcn*w
rmimxinm ^.cnm\ Hr^mptxx*
Lat t« Biocft I.
TUtg gurvcy IhuMO t^k locatiUA of gll
e«i«tm9 butltfinqg «nH viiibic ‘hard-
cow«r in mine ion to tnc bounder i«a
of tno anovo doacriUi'd nroporty. It
dooa not purport to «no« any otnar
iopcnu oaion ia or cnerooctvnonia .
n I Iron onikor
Hoar mat «no«n aia naaod
on an aaauood datuo.
I iTtlify llul iktt »• f*Ty r»r^i4/r«i by inr t»# w*4J»* «J<rrti
4l*m «nd IIU41 4«« • 4aiy C*r4 Ln^mrri •nd Lund ^nnyo* wrnlrr
inr U«v« id ihr SlM* M*Am«A4
WUrt S Cn««t)«TC Mmnrtuu Irmar N^i«uny IJT^k
1 • I ¥ • b I
«»•«• bt • t«*
Fiwfl^iNr ® USa^.f.
fpAfbW«e:
f75>drf^iNr =^76»^.F
X'McMonigalArchitects
Lri-^E^^UiVT pEi>lPEH^6.
UAHE
\T McMonigalArdiitects
t^TTE-. ENT\te ^/TTE/t_fW- TD
ftc yNPiNvirttO. tNjVv^rrfe^
VAf*t
1 EL€onMc^i
s I't?”
f’fEUMiNAft.-Y
Lru^E-^^v/^vr fz-Et>voE.H6.e
UAHE
55'2>^1
A. ■ Houss 3C:
3. GaI^ASc
0,.SlC£^<ALK di^d£-
COuc. JC£]?>L —-
zatJc'.
t-2/^CtlecQ
M • • •HARDCuVEa CALC’JLATIQH WORKSHEET SETBACK lotis: (ctRCLE-ONE) C-75'25C-5QQ' 5wQ--uC0 Exi st INQ HAncccvEr. ui Zcne PROPCS0 Q77r S.F.
length width
%
t •
• S.F.
w
X •.
• •
S.F.
S.F.
* m I • vt •
_ $.?.
^V■0 V' IM. ■ 0
I •> if» • •
c. Oriveiiay 2 1. ■■ PavA x JM.
• ••
, X
- X
- X
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.’
Cf^5—
t
5*<? • _ S.F.
• •
- X
. ,*• »•
♦• •••• •
7. V X
• •
F.Landscape
AREAS
unoerlmh
BY ■ . ^—
plastic-----
SHEETING
>< 2-<r
:____ X
// u
X
m • • • »
- X
C^AyC. <f(o(KS
s. - X
X -
X
S.F.
S.F.'
S.F.
S.F.
t
, (
. S.F.
. S.F.
I
. ?.F.
• %
m •
Total HAROCCves in Zone
f
TotAU PAOfEATY Aa EA IH ZC"®
201-^__^,S.F.
• 9 9TS' s.f,
£
T
9f 7^_ X 100 • ZO.
• • »
• •
ComN & Gronberg, Inc.1 hrrcijy ccrtiTy that Iha survey was prrparctJ by me or uihIct my dirret super*
maon. and th^ 1 am t duly rrg>slcfnf Gvil Engineer and Land Surveyor under
the bwrt of tbe Siale of V^rmuU.
OATf 7 . 1 ^ . 9 2
, V.. ... ( . .. NtN .
. « • ■• ^
Mark S. Cnmbrr^ MinrK*suU Licemc NumU.*r 127SS HMNkX 1%^
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU'NCIL
• •
NO. p ^
B.
r
D.
E.
The former detached garage was located 1*2" from the side lot line and
the new structure will be located 10’.
The proposed improvement will result in a reduction of hardcover.
If garage was placed parallel to street meeting the 10’ side and street
setback, a large maple tree would have to be removed.
If proposed garage was to meet the 30 ’ street setback, the 10 separation
setback between principal structure and detached structure could not be
met.
4 The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not applv generally to other property in this zonmg distnct; that
erranting the variance would not adversely affect traffic condiuons, Ught, air nor
nose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
Urve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to aUeviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial propeip^
right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5 The City Couned has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City CouncU hereby
• ... fr. Miinicinal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) to permit the
^ToTa^i W^eScheTg^^^ within the street yard of the lakeshore lot to be located
" L r.qu«d 30-, subjcc. to following eonditioost
Page 2 of 5
iMifliQMi
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. • -
1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (June 14. 1994).
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of June, 1993.
lorothy kllin, City Clerk Edward J. CailafaaifrJr.'.^Mayor
Property Owner(s)
'/I
/
Page 3 of 5
taaMII OMI
41'
STATE OF NANNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL<5
NO. ^ ^ -_______
On this /c/^ day of Tun^__________199^. before m^a Notar>'
Public within and for said county, personally appeared J L> fjd —v.—^—X—r
.y^arr.fcL known to me to be the person(s) described in and who execmed
the for'igoing ihstniment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his ( e**)
act and deed.
m USD A S. VE£
notary Pueuc • MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My convniuion «apir«s A-I2-M
•
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a Notary
Public within and for said county, personally appeared--------------^^-----—-----------
known to me to be the person(s) descnbed m and who executed
the foregoing instrument, andTcknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free
act and deed.
NOTARY PUBUC
Page 5 of 5