Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-13-1996 Council Packet
NOTE CHANGE IN START TIME AGE>H)A FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1995, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of January 23, 1995 PARK CONLMISSION COMMENTS K . PLANNING COXLMISSION COMMENTS - Candace Rowlette Representative PUBLIC CO^LMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3. #1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane - Variance - Resolution 4. #1986 David Yorks, 2825 Casco Point Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variance Resolution 5. #1987 Larry Pillar, 2705 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Resolution 6. #1988 Kenneth J. Severinson, 2800 Shadywood Road - Variances - Resolution 7. 3585 Sixth Avenue North - Home Occupation License Renewal License MAYORyCOUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 8. Kelly Avenue Drainage CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 9. Establish Date and Time for CDBG Public Hearing 10. 1995 Insurance Awards * 11. 1980 Bond Fund Close Out - Resolution * 12. Seasonal Road Weight Limits - Resolution * 13. Appointment to Building Code Board of Review - Resolution * 14. feer Commission Reappointments * 15. Ft Je*al Bridge Replacement Grant Agreement - Resolution CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*16.) LICENSES (*17.) BILLS NOTE CHANGE IN START TIME AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1995, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MP;NES0TA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 02/13 - Council meeting 7:30 p.m. 02/14 - Orono School Board meeting 5:00 p.m. 02/15 - Orono School Board meeting Noon - 4:30 p.m 02/20 - HOLIDAY - Presidents ’ Day 02/21 - Planning Commission Work Session 7:00 p.m. 02/22 - Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. 01/27 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/28 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION ^ COUNCIL ) PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (£rum agenda) NAME OR NUMBER . f 2. 3.. 4.. 5.. 6.. 7.. 8.. 9., 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. £LL \£A yUfy *-f TefO I'r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 23,1995 ✓ y The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayrfj&^d^ J Callahan, Jr., CouncU Members J. Diann Goetten, and Gabriel Jabbour. JoEllen arrived at 8:35 p.m. Charles Kelley was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Public Works Director John W Gerhardson, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Shawn Gustafson, and Recorder Sherry’ Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#2) AAA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD - JOANNE BOCHE Jo Anne Boche presented an award to the City of Orono for five years of having no pedestrian accidents. The only other city to receive the same award is Maple Grove. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#3) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 9,1995 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 9, 1995. Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Park Commission was present. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Planning Commission was piesent. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. POLICE CHIEF REPORT Chief Sullivan reported the recovery of some money and a printing press in a drug and counterfeiting operation in the Navarre area. The police department has been working with the U. S. Customs Service and Secret Service on this case. minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 (#4) SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER UPDATE Officer Scott Boris presented to the Council an overview of his responsibilities md accomplishments as Liaison Officer with the Orono Middle School and Hi^ School. This position has enabled the police department to bring its resources to the school, providing instruction and availabUity of an officer to concentrate on trouble areas within the school, and assist in providing information to the students and faculty on police and court system subjects. Boris sees the main thrust of the position as pre-delinquCTt intervention, in steering a student away from possible criminal or delinquent behavior. Boris has also provided insight into student assessment and information on student contact with other law enforcement agencies, as well as to readily report and process criminal cases. The budget at this time only allows for part-time funding, although Boris believ« there is a potential for a fulltime liaison officer. Boris reported the major impact his position has made has been to divert some students from involvement in more serious cnminal activities. Boris said his main contact to coordinate his activities at the schools has been with the principals and assistar ^ principals of the two schools. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#5) #1989 WILLIAM STODDARD, 2805 KFI LY AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3517 The Applicant was present. Mabusth reported that this appUcation is to e.xcavate 600 cubic yards from a low arw in the applicant's yard. Originally, the intent was to create a decorative pond using rock as a border The applicant thought he had obtained the proper permts but needed to obtain a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. He had obtained permits from the MCWD and Corps of Engineers to construct the pond. The ^plicant also is worlMg with the City on the realignment of his driveway which is in the flooding area of K^y Avenue The Planning Commission recommended the pond to be a type 3 wetlMd wth a graduated slope, deepening to about 7-8' in the center, with a natural look, requinng Uttle maintenance. The applicant reported he is satisfied with the requirements recommended by the Planning Commission He also noted that the pond will store about 75,000 gallons of water. Goetten received confirmation that the proposed pond will not affect the improvements under consideration for Kelly Avenue. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3517 for a conditional use permit. Ayes 3, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 (#6) B-2 ORDINANCE PROPOSED AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 132, 2ND SERIES The Council received a revised draft of the B-2 Ordinance Proposed Amendment and were asked for corrections or comments. The Council is concerned that the landscap ing clause where a marina must comply with a landscaping plan prior to receiving approval of a conditional use permit may be unattainable. Gaflron said that each marina will meet with Staff to determine a realistic landscaping plan. Each marina will need to meet the criteria regardless of whether or not they are seeking a CUP. H utt moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the B-2 Ordinance Amendment, ^132, 2nd Series, as revised. Ayes 4, Nays 0. Moorse commented that any accessory uses that were added would have an impact on the site in regards to available parking. MAYOR/COlINCIL REPORT A work session on the police department was scheduled for Thursday, March 9, 1995, for 8.00 a.m. Jabbour commented on the success of the mediation session on Hwy 12. Jabbour brought to Council’s attention issues discussed at a recent LMCD meeting. He is uncomfortable with the PUD on the Boardwalk issue and concerned with water ski srfety due to proposed plans to eliminate the requirement for an observer in the accompanying boat. Callahan a.sked Moorse to write a letter to the LMCD on the water ski issue. Hurr reported on the thoroughness of the work sessions by the Planning Commission on the profiosed battered women's shelter. She suggested the Council update themselves on the proceedings so far to eliminate spending the time to update at a future meeting. The minutes from the last meeting were included in Council's packet. The public will be invited to attend an upcoming meeting with the Planning Commission. Neighbors within 300' of the proposed site will be invited. Hurr said the closest neighbor to the site is in support of the project but asked that the CUP be amended under that zone without changing the actual zoning. The Staff is attempting to determine the need at this time and has not yet discussed the land use issues. It was noted that the applicant has until mid May to close on the mortgage. Both Hurt and Jabbour reported receiving negative response to the temporary closing of Old Beach Road. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 ENGINEER REPORT (#7) KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE City Engineer Shawn Gustafson updated the Council on the drainage study completed for Kelly Avenue. 35 acres extending to CoRd 19 drain to Kelly pond. This pond annually rises and floods the road. The present drainage system is not functioning well and fills up with sediment. Gustafson presented the Council with five options, four of which were gravity-type solutions, to remedy the problem. They are follows: A) Construction of a storm sewer from Kelly pond to Carman Cove pond. This can be constructed within the right-of-way but would require excavation 20' deep to install the pipe. Estimated cost $81,000. B) Construction of a storm sewer following the natural drainage t^y. Alignment would require easements. The depth of excavation would be minimized by following the perimeter of the wetland area. Estimated cost $70,000 (no estimate for easements). C) Replacement of the existing culverts and drainage tile. Estimated cost $66,i mil D) Connection of all four ponds in the area by storm water piping draining out to Carman Cove. Estimated cost $85,000. E) Construction of a lift station and pump at the south side to include an equalization system which would filter the water. This would be constructed along the right-of-way. Estimated cost $57,000. The City Engineers looked at what would have the minimal impact on the neighborhood. The report also recommended the raising of a portion of the roadway. To raise Kelly Avenue 1* would cost about $29,000. To raise the road 2' would cost about $40,000. Gustafson said the sanitary sewer and water main in Kelly Avenue is sitting on 15' of swamp deposits and has caused settlement and will continue to do so. The Engineer would recommend further study of the sanitary sewer to determine whether it needs replacement. To replace the sewer line would cost approximately $18,000. The Engineer recommends Option E as this option is the least expensive and will have the least impact on the neighborhood. Recommendation is also for raising the road T but not with light weight fill. The Engineer recommends replacement of the sanitary sewer but only after a study of the system is made. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 (#7 - Kelly Avenue Drainage - Continued) Option E would use a 6" pipeline, which is less than the 18" stonn sewer. The lift station would cost $13,000, and the City would be able to salvage a pump Irom an existing lift station. This piping would cause little disruption as h can be trenched in. No easements would be required. Moorse noted that the $56,000 does include legal administrative, and engineering costs. Normal costs have been included for a total of $56,000+$58,000=$114,000, for lift station and raising of Kelly Avenue. Jabbour questioned why the pe:t material would be left under the road. Gustafson said the e.\isting line would be replaced with a joint with a locked restraint that can take the settlement caused by the peat. If the sanitary sewer is found to be in good condition, it can possibly remain in place. The road can still be raised without replacing the sanitary sewer line. The soil engineer estimated 2" of settlement in the foture and 3" with raising the road 2* for a total of 5". Gustafson recommended a neighborhood meeting be held to discuss the options and financing. Gerhardson said there are 20-25 homes in the area and under 50 property owners. At this time, one home would be affected by the plan. William Stoddard, a neighbor on Kelly Avenue, is in favor of raising the road. He voiced concern over the size of the lift station but was informed that the majority of it is underground. The high water level was discussed. Gustafson said the raising of the road by 2' would place the road 1* above the high water level of932.5'. Jabbour reported that indications are that the high water level now will soon become the norm rather than the exception. Jabbour said the Council needs to develop a policy on how to handle this problem as it will happen again as water levels rise. Callahan directed Staff to prepare costs involved in the project and information for the neighborhood meeting. The Council will next discuss the finances of the project. Gustafson said that the cost could be formulated by the watershed basis cost and divided up by the watershed area. This can be based on the amount of flow contributed as well as the amount of hardcover. Callahan asked Gustafson to make this determination and bring the formula back to the Council for discussion. minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#8) LONG LAKE WATER QUALITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Mr Maple of the MCWD was present to discuss the revised cooperative agreement for the Long Lake improvement project. He reiterated the project's purpose was to clean Long Lake and would like this project to be a cooperative effort between the three cities of Long Lake, Orono and Medma. The project no longer includes the construction of aeration systems, but has been replaced by chemical treatment using alum. Under the draft, the City would be responsible for the sediment removal costs of the wet detention ponds. The City's annual share of these costs is estimated to be $4,535 per year. The other responsibilities of the City would be to prepare a local water management pl^ for this area, and submit it to the MCWD for review and approval prior to construction of the improvements; agreement to develop policies and disseminate information on best management practices and include these in the water management plan; clean the fish barrier in the CoRd 6 pond; and provide a representative to the project advisory committee. Mr. Maple said that the change to alum was made to avoid the ne^ to maintain aerators. The alum treatment, he reported, was a one-time treatment, effective for water clarity improvement for 4-5 years It would cost about $300,000 for treating Long Lake. Callahan voiced his concern over the funding of the project. Callahan also disapproved of the large project committee concept. Maple reported on the concerns of a fee owner involved. The MCWD determined the need for a 5-6 acre treatment area adjacent to CoRd 6. They are possibly looking at a jurisdictional wetland to the south of CoRd 6 which would probably reduce the size of the ponds on the fee owner's land. Maple said a definitive plan should be presented for public hearing in about 2-3 weeks but are not close to any type of agreement with the fee owner as of yet. Maple did note that the ponds in question will become larger creating additional sedimentation which will increase the costs of removal. The City Engineer could assist m determining future costs. Jabbour said that the drafts have been made without consideration of input fi-om the Orono Council. Jabbour suggested that the MCWD receive Council’s input prior to the next draft. Callahan noted the portion of the agreement from page 7 on should be eliminated. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 (#9) AWARD 1995 MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT BIDS Moorse reported that these are the annual bids for equipment and materials for the City's Public Works Department. Examples are aggregate, bituminous, backhoes, etc.; equipment requiring an operator. Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 1995. Hurr asked that the bids be divided amongst bidders to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year’s work. Ayes 3, Nays 0 (Goetten was not present during the motion.) (•#10) CONFIRM 1995 BOARD OF REVIEW DATE Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, tc schedule the 1995 Board of Review hearing for 7 00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 26, 1975. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (•#11) RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - ALEX VONGRIES - RESOLUTION #3518 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3518 in appreciation of Alexander Vongries* dedicated service as a member ai'd co-chair of the Park Commission. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (•#12) ADA COMPLIANCE AUDIT - COST CORRECTION Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the proposal from Julee Quarve-Peterson to provide consulting services for the purpose of assisting the City in complying with the laws pertaining to the Americans with Disabilities Act at a cost not to exceed $5,475, to be funded from ih. special project contingency account. Ayes 3, Nays 0. OTY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett requested adjournment to Executive Session at 9:10 p.m. (•#13) LICENSES There were no licenses. (•#14) BILLS Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, Nays 0. minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1995 ADJOURNMENT The Council adjourned to Executive Session at 9:10 p.m. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 8 S (O s 00 s U Pc; r nn - Hn ^ • • • Q W tfl W JTI ^ y C/)m to O < > o n — •a § §• 31 O 3c*^ D. Ss3 2. 03 K B O* § 5 In *— ^ c c oK s a a 3 c o w «2 ^O* i. 5 " » a a £; D. o s H 1. s sf* rf 5 o ”^>a i s V 2 o si $d o\ Oi 4^ Ui u> La 00LA <!«: ^ g:uo2. ^ 'I-a r-*" Oc:oc I H O tJ•a *2 §■ h 5« g c/i n go 5^fi3 <Sis §• CO R‘S* VO VO 00 00 00 ^ 50 fXo ;ii go o VO VO GO Ov ngn cc.o 3 M & 2g O 25.15“1to uon 2:o CO f><o K> O LA H O 50 o 3 C a 50 a e. o 5 5* < O*? 8« tfl ^ O Xo B.1 o 3 m S-n K) 00 8 ?cr Xn CO B* ^•! oc •3 ><;o 3Co fx ^ po ^ giIJ 'v;La (j K 2 n u rn 0 0^3 *T3 H O o o 50 B' ^ H r n noV 53 RH C/1 »-► CO -1 c R C 8. S’ lA O nr» S 50o CJ Q. < Pa. p gn o p p. •-I >c* 3 (Y 8. O 3 P < 50o8 M &n *10n o 3 S’n C ^ <s. oo y COm y H :> :v ?f'V ’ >om o > CL-i R:i;3 '^rr, |£>S § J?p fv o II 3 R >r »-• 5. ^ - 8* S' O o ST w c« UQ D. 2. 3 5n;. § yoS n L*« * • H l‘J;. I o M c « — *3 3® § 2 g- 5 3 «> 2 I Ull r S JL r>r» (A o 3 oo 3 P. u.o 50 Ro S’*o (Ar» 3E> Bo c--.:[| B « C. 8 a g- o- or »:vir - •• rr) CO mMWi ^,-v .«* • > REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Fe5WMy 2,-i895 -3ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane - Variance - Resolution The Planning Commission reviewed the variance application at both the November and January meetings of the Planning Commission. Final action was taken at the January 17, 1995 meeting. Zoning District: LR-IB requiring one acre in area Total area of property = 20,900 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (A). A. Lot area variance granted by City on July 11, 1994, refer to Resolution No. 3449, Exhibit F. B.Street setback variance. Required = 35 ’ Proposed =25 ’* Variance = 10’ or 29% * Refer to Exhibit O 1. 2. 3. Setback from existing traveled road = 46’ Setback from upgraded 28’ road = 42’ Setback from 10’ grassed boulevard adjacent to upgraded road = 32’ 2.Section 10.56, Subdivision 6 (C) (2) - Bluff impact zones. Applicant’s amended plan proposes no encroachment of the bluff nor bluff impact zones of the property. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Form E - Topographic Map Locating Existing and Adjacent Residences Request for Council Action continued Page 2 February 2, 1995 #1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane F - G - H - I - J-1-2 K - L - M - Resolution No. 3449 - Approval of Area Variance Minutes of Council Meeting 7/11/94 Hardcover Fact Sheet, 500-1,000’ Setback Area Survey of Two Options of Development Submitted for 11/94 Meeting Original Front/Rear Elevations Amended Site Plan Floor Plan/Footprint Elevation, Front N-1-2 Floor Plans O - Survey Locating Travelled/Proposed Road Improvements P - Gustafson Report 1/9/95 Status Report As already noted, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance application at both Ae November and January meetings. The three-member Commission at the November meeting provided directives to applicant noting concerns with the original proposal and recommended tnat the applicant request tabling all review until the January meeting. Applicant submitted an amended proposal seeking a street setback variance only as plan shows no encroachment of either the bluff or bluff impact zone. The amended proposal was approved in a 6 to 1 vote of the Commission. Description of Request The applicant was present during the review of variance application #1911 that granted the area variance for the undeveloped lot of the recent lot line rearrangement subdivision application of Ernest Lemmerman. During that review the legal building envelope was defined as shown on Exhibit F-2. Council at the time of their approval of the application directed that this site plan defining the legal envelope be included as part of the formal approval resolution. At the November meeting applicant provided two plans for development, review Exhibits I and J One proposal proposed setbacks to the bluff impact zone and the other a street setback. At the November meeting. Planning Commission members advised that they would not approve any improvement plan that would ask for setbacks to the bluff area or bluff unpact zone of this property. At that same meeting, the three members also noted the need to reduce the footprint of residence, noting that the three-car garage appeared excessive. Although ther<» was no hardcover issue, the concern was the impact of a larger struemre on the severely slopmg property. Review Exhibits K, L, M and N, the footprint of the residence has been reduced and the garage relocated to the west side of the residence. Staff has concurred that the relocated curb cut is in a better location on Tonkaview Road. The total footprint of the residence has been Request for Council Action continued Page 3 February 2, 1995 #1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane reduced to approximately 30’ x 60 ’ with a 15’ x 15 patio to the east side of the residence, all located out of the bluff impact zone. The three stall garage has been reduced to two stalls. The front line of the structure will be located 46 ’ from the existing travelled road. Staff asked Gustafson to consider a potential upgrade of Tonkaview Lane and he advised that because of the limited right-of-way and placement of existing residence that the road would be installed as an urban section at a 28’ maximum width measured to the inside of the curb with 10’ grassed boulevard. The front line of the proposed strucnire would be located now 42’ from the improved road and 32’ from the north side of the 10’ wide grassed boulevard area, refer to Exhibit O. The Planning Commission appeared to have no problem with the street setback variance of 10’ but was concerned with the potential impact from the development of this site if grading and drainage plans were not carefully supervised by the City Engineer. Members specifically asked that roof drainage be directed away from the north and east sides of the residence and directed to the road. The Engineer asked that lot grading be extended into the unimproved right-of-way of Tonkaview Lane so that retaining walls and tree removal would be minimized because of a 4-6 ’ high embankment at the proposed location of the curb cut. The Planmng Commission was also concerned that erosion control be shown on all grading plans and that control measures be implemented as soon as the upper elevations are disnirbed. It was also noted that applicant should provide a landscape stabilization plan. Grading and drainage plans were to be completed by a licensed engineer. If retaining walls were to be used, they wanted them to not only be located on the plan but to provide the engineering specs to ensure adequacy of structure. The minority opinion of one felt that the structure should be further reduced to minimize any impact on the severely limited site. The majority of the Planning Commission felt that as long as the bluff and bluff impact zones were not encroached and that attention was paid to the grading and drainage detail that the proposal was satisfactory. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended approval of the street setback variance of 10’ adopting the original findings and hardships set forth in Resolution No. 3449 and, hardships as set forth by a, Meant on Exhibit A and as developed during review of the application as follows: 1.The location of travelled road at 46 ’ from front line of proposed residence. Even if road was upgraded, structure would still be 42’ from actual travelled road. The code would require a 35’ setback. The building envelope has been severely impacted by the required setbacks from the bluff and bluff impact zone. Request for Council Action continued Page 4 Februa»y 2, 1995 #1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane 3.The legal building pad is defined at 22’ x lOO’. The 22’ depth must also provide adequate area for access stairs, decks and other accessory structures required for a two-story walkout residence. Approval was subject to the following conditions: a Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plan for City Engineer’s review upon application for building permit. Plans must be drawn by a licensed civil engineer. Plans must include erosion control and if retaining walls are proposed, engineering detail must be provided on the walls. The site plan should also locate such walls. b. Upon application for a building permit, a landscape stabilization plan must also be submitted. c. Applicant shall be responsible for scheduling all required inspections as specified by City Engineer with his review of detailed grading and drainage plans. d. Roof plans for house shall address need for roof drainage being directed away from the north and east sides of residence. Because of the 4-6’ high embankment at the northwest comer adjacent to Tonkaview Lane, the Engineer asks that tl:e lot grading be extended into the right-of-way of the unimproved roadway so that retaining walls and tree removal will be minimized. f. Applicant is placed on notice that the City will not allow encroachment of the bluff impact areas for accessory strucmres or improvements such as decks or staircases at any time in the future. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COLTNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the approval resolution. e. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) FILE NO. 1981 WHEREAS, Todd R. Coumeya (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 4620 Tonkaview Lane within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Lemmerman Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Mi^cipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the construction of a 30’ x 60 residence on an undeveloped property to be located 25’ from the street lot line instead of the required 35’. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1981. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 43,560 s.f. or one acre in area. The property consists of 20,900 s.f. or .47 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 21, 1994 and January 17,1995 and recommended approval of the variance application as amended based upon the following findings: A.The property has been assessed for sewer and a sewer snib is available at Tonkaview Lane for new residential construction. B.Lot 1 of the Lemmerman Addition was created as a result of a lot line rearrangement that divided the two lots along a natural division line created by steep topographies. Page 1 of 5 I 1 -% • *1^ E. The lot is severely impacted by required setbacks from the defined top of the bluff and bluff impact zones. The legal building envelope is defined at approximately 22 ’ in depth at 100’ length. The 22 ’ envelope was to provide not only envelope for the principal structure but all accessory structures needed to serve a two-story residence. The residential construction as proposed will minimize any negative impact upon the steeper topographies to the north and the east. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alle ate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit construction of a new residence on an undeveloped parcel to be located 25 ’ from the street lot line and approving a street setback variance of 10’ or 29%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon application for a building permit, the following shall be included: Page 2 of 5 5. 6. 7. 8. a. Detailed grading and drainage plan for City Engineer’s review. Plans must be drawn by a licensed civil engineer. Such plans must include erosion control. If retaining walls are proposed, engineering detail must be provided on the walls. Site development plan should also locate such walls. b. A landscape stabilization plan. Applicant shall be responsible for scheduling all required inspections as specified by City Engineer with his review of detailed grading and drainage plans. Roof plans for house shall address need for roof drainage to be directed away from the north and east sides of the property and directed to the south or Tonkaview Lane. Applicant to obtain a permit for the creation of a curb cut from the Public Works Department. Applicant is further advised that because of the 4-6 ’ high embankment at the northwest comer that grading be extended mto the right-of- way so that retaining walls and tree removal will be minimized. Applicant is further advised that the City will not allow encroachment of the bluff impact areas for accessory structures or improvements such as decks or staircases at any time in the future. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicMt, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 13, 1996). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resofution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner Ernest Lemmerman Applicant Todd R. Coumeya STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of February, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public withinand for said County, personally appeared ___________________________________ known to me to be the i^rson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ss. , 199___, before me a Notary Public withinand for said County, personally appeared _______________________________—— known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ____________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 To: From; Date: Subject: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 9, 1995 /^1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Total area of property = 20,900 s.f. Review of Amended Proposal Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (B) - Non-encroachment ... terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level are considered non-encroachments and may extend into required yard areas. Refer to Exhibits B and D, grade or ground level patio may extend within street yard but may not encroach a bluff setback area. 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 5 (A) Required = 35 ’ Original proposal = 25’ Amended proposal = 25’ - Street setback variance for amended proposal. A. Setback from existing traveled road = 46 ’ B. Setback from upgraded 28 ’ road = 42’ C. Setback from 10’ grassed boulevard of upgraded road = 32 ’ List of Exhibits A - Original Front and Rear Elevations B - Revised Site Plan C - Revised Front Elevation D - Footprint of House E - First/Ground Floor Plan F - Second Floor Plan G - Hardcover H Survey Locating Travelled Road I - Gustafton Report 1/9/95 Zoning File il'1981 January 9, 1995 Page 2 Status of Application At the November 21st meeting of the Planning Comraission, the three members in attendance advised applicant to request tabling application until the January meeting providing applicant additional time to develop an amended plan that would address the following concerns of the members: 1. Need to reduce the footprint of residence noting that three-car garage appeared excessive. Members preferred a street setback variance rather than encroachment of the bluff areas of the property. Members did not specifically specify how much of a street setback variance would be acceptable. They also encouraged applicant to relocate decks and staircases out of the bluff area and bluff impact zones (30’ from top of blufO. Review of Revised Plan Applicant has reduced footprint of residence to approximately 30’ x 60 ’. The attached garage has been reduced from 3 to 2 stalls and has been relocated to the west side of the residence. The principal .and accessory strucuires will be located out of the bluff impact zone and the principal structure will be located 25’ from the street lot line. The structure will be located 46 ’ from the existing travelled road. Review Exhibit I, Gustafson notes in his report that if Tonkaview Road is upgraded, it will be installed as an urban section at a 28’ width measured to the inside of the curb with 10’ grassed boulevard areas. The proposed structure will be located 42’ from the improved road and 32’ from the grassed boulevard area (refer to Exhibit H). In his report, Gustafson goes on to ask that upon application for a building permit the applicant provide detailed grading and drainage plans for his review. He also notes that there may be retaining walls along the north property lines because of the steep topographies. The Engineer ’s report does not note the need to redirect drainage from roof away from the steep bank elevations. Staff suggests that all or the majority of roof drainage be directed towards the roadway. Applicant ’s building plans must provide information on how roof drainage is to be directed towards road and away from the north and east lot lines. Issues for Consideration 1. Has applicant addressed the concerns of the three-member Planning Commission? Zoning File #1981 January 9, 1995 Page 3 2. Do members have any questions concerning Section 10.03, Subd. 15 (B) that would allow applicant to extend a ground level paiio into street yard area? The patio may be extended as long as it does not encroach into the bluff impact zone. Non-encroachments may extend into required yard areas but not required setback areas (i.e lakeshore setbacks, average lakeshore setbacks, bluff setbacks). 3. Does this proposal for development appear feasible for the propeny ? Is it too ambitious or excessive? Note hardcover is at 16.8% where 35% would be allowed. Options of Action To deny revised proposal seeking a 10* street setback variance. Approval of the revised application as proposed, subject to the following conditions. 1. Applicant to provide a detailed grading and drainage plan for City Engineer s review upon application for building permit. 2.Roof plans for house shall address need for roof drainage to be directed away from the north and east sides of residence. 3. Because of the 4-6 ’ high embankment at the northwest comer, the Engineer asks that lot grading be extended into the right-of-way so that retaining walls and tree removal will be minimized. 4. The City will not allow encroachment of the bluff impact areas of accessory structures or improvements such a decks or staircases. REQUIRED SUEMTETALS . „ deadjja^aiiiaM^ fnr vnnr anDUc->^?nn to be considercd_com£lete. 1. 2. j. 4. m 3. 6. 7. S. 9. reproduciioa .»'evacioas) if any changes in exisiing grade ___Topographic snrvey (existing anapr p gi^- x 11" for reproduction. are proposed. In views (provide one (1) copy 8li" x 11"). Sketches or plans of fl.or L crams) of ■’il nersons with an interest m the — List of the legal not current owner(s). property. This would include nara ) ^ separate list of any other persons As an addendum to this application, please atucn p vou wish notirled of this application. Additional items as may be requested by C.ty san. ^ • ^ ,cr dem rhis ''ro'ication. Please remember that vour Adminisaator. agrees to payS^his application, and certifies that the Applicant'. OWT^ER’S SIGNATL-^ % .yv/Cre-s to this application and further authorizes reasonable rte a'gents, Comrrtissioa members, and Conned ^ lA^.in" DateOwner's Signature . Date *?/. io^ Owner s iigi»<.ui<^ r ------------//------------------ this change prior to the meeting. • ., 8 • • cmr OF ORONO - variance application f\r laicial AppUcatioa Fee 5200.00 (550.00 per each addidonai vanance; Renewal Variance Fee 5100.00 (no change from original applicauon) Variance for non-conforming stmerures After-the-Fact Fees (Double appUcauon fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION i O'! err if CROHO •rr r^ccTrc *• • U. C’f » .i ■» Vi’;* ’• “V .It 4,w*V'«VV t'uzn' ilU w W V • VV9 mm —^ w - ^ ill rrc-T-Tuvnr;t tnnrji\ » ut-* L V 1 C‘,'r i 7 i i •n»_awu*^'V ww'i i%vJi i*A« ^operty Anach legal descripdon to application u n * (month/year) Proc^rev Arrruired —UE^------—-- »-. «■ “ S.I«W)Present use or properry. _2^rw^iue.uia ----- Zoning DrimiC::_____J-Aji_i^------------------ .APPLIC.ANT Name '^OO Oaoo^MiN axU'- »*^*^^*^ ------------- — Acirirgss: pi<^^ (pgoTi^Jt^v PhODC rhome) 63 ? -------- Phone (work) 55~3~ -------- Zip: OV\NER (if different than applicant) M-me Address: u.lderhu^^ T/^*hll Phondhotne)_J/2.Z2JSL!--------- Phone (work) --------- rirv: KV)aoi^^_________Ziv:_^52.^ description of request ^____in ripwil: Bunated Cpssavcaoa CosiS /go^o^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot .Area ___L°' Width oVWk- of , ! -------r (attach additional sheets if accessary) X Setback: ^ Other (specify) Side __Hardcover j^Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore utner i,5pc-.,u/./ p 17 "*■' H.OHIP/DESCRIPnON OF ptrenting Doaenbe undue tuidsiup or practical ditfic^ or un^^^ u.. dl, gUt^ _ comijliance t«ih Zotiing Code.requiferacnts: -JVe lef iS \riL 4LT^ VJ i i*l ^ I mrnmm -------^CTjt^ffasres. -ru. leWic «<y ^ ^ <xv<>0 (attach addidonai sheets if necessary) • r-* .*!■’ <• *•» ■ -r • <• > •.; - ■■^ ^ t^ I*^RUN 0ATI.0«/Si/94 ,VV^ii’BATCH 007 . ; . .SB 07-117-2S 31 0015 ■'^^1- -PROP AOOR" . 01270 NILOHURST TR OMNER hake;, jar STASIK ,;,>vJTA)<PAVER JAMES STASIK HE^t«PIN COUNTY PROPERTYPROPERTY OHNERS LISTVp ..'i;tNAME/AOOR . 1270 NILOHURST TRAIL V. . , ^ ee«tA'V-' \ 07-117-23 31 0026 Uj'VRROP AOOR'-^ 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ,i|rs«'OHNER NAME.; ROBERT L BIRKELAND A HIFE -TAXPAYER ■ •• ^.;;^NAME/A00R ROBERT L BIRKELAND 1296 HILDHURST TRAIL HOUND FM 55369 *i^PROP ADDR f[SfftO>ICR NAME. *5^4TAXPAYER V v>; ' ‘ 38 07-117-23 31 0033 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ERNEST J A MARY J LEMHERMAN ERNEST J A MARY J LEMHERMAN 1297 NILOHURST TRAIL hound m 55369 p; 4;.f. PROP ADDR ylS RL' ONNER NAME 38 07-117-23 32 0025 09625 TONKAVIEN LA |WW , R H SHELTON -AML SHELTON WiMTAXPAYER 1 R H SHELTON AML SHELTON :-i#S^N*HE/AOOR i ^2S TONKAVIEN LA i * . A • t ■ . ^ • /,# 4 V ^ ? PROP ADDR iO pl ^OHNER NAME C>.':£r-,TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR w.-;, • < >... V *, 36' 07-117-23 32 0096 09650 TONKAVIEN LA J 0 DOLEZAL A J A'ROSTAD J 0 DOLEZAL A J A ROSTAO 9650 TONKA VIEN LA HOUND HN 55369 - ■:\••■ : .r-. • -J .A ‘.A*^V.y » »P • ,V:^' -REPORT NO. PAGE38 07-117-23 31 0020T ‘ -00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED > *ROBERT L BIRKELAND ETAL 'V. ROBERT L BIRKELAND 1296 NILOHURST TRAIL MOUND MN 55369 : ... .. ,,j- , v,^. • y • ^f■. .• • • V •') .S . 07-117-23 31 0032 ‘^V! 01297 NILOHURST TR ‘ ' ‘ , yy ■ « J LEfflEWIAN ETAL . ’ /, ;• • • . ; . ERNEST J LEMHERMAN . ' 1297 HILOmjRST TR 'f* * mjMn MJ 4.* t 38 07-117-2X 31 0027 '01298 NILOHURST TR MARIT BIRKELAND ROBERT L A HARIT BIRKELAND 1298 NILOHURST TR hound m 55369 , V 38 07-117-23 31 0031 01299 NILOHURST TR P M SCHIMMEL A H S COMINSKY PATTI MAE SCHIMMEL 1299 NILOHURST TR MOUND rm 55369 1297 HILOmjRST TR HOUND m 55369 38 07-117-23 31 0038 01261 NILOHURST TR S f HENNESSY A K L HENNESSY S M A K L HENNESSY 1261 NILOHURST TR MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0027 09635 TONKAVIEN LA C J FENNER A K S FENNER CHARLES J FENNER 2215 LINCOLN ST N E MPLS MN 55918 * • • » ^ *« tp- - V. . ^ •- <• - J) . > 4. t9 i ' 9^ r TOTAL BATCH 007 00013. “ ;%-r : *6. . 4 '.• ■■ I 36 07-117-23 32 0029 .1 y- .00036 ADDRESS UNASSXGlIlO KATHLEEN 0 ASH KATHLEEN 6 ASH ’ ; . 9589 SHORELINE OR 8101 SPRING PARK FM 55389 38 07-117-23 32 0093 09690 TONKAVIEN LA K2fMETH j HICKEY KENNETH J HICKEY 9690 TONKAVIEN LA hound HN 55369' ;r. '•' •! ,»v : * •" .*■ • * ' W V . ‘ i ' i.* .. , V ' ’. •CV . itv\ . f .. w- > I •• • M / I ; • ‘ ' *’^ Vt -.4 * ' *. if 7 -v *■ v; i.\ *‘ • • A . A ■ •. •^ • A •.. ;v •; ■t i., • t. • PI93S901 ■ • 16 . 4r* •• • .'i;v • J - ~ t* J H 9. » (X)m i3U4^t, 1 I Kt r'-'.'^?,-.-;... -r‘DATE 0«/2*/1«OB-HENNEPIN COUNTY PPOPERTY XMFOWUTION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWCRS LIST » .\i 'I# *»REroRT NO. RAGE RXA5540117v;-MTCM QQ7;* !.•■••' •' i‘-xLT •' ‘ 1 . • '••• *t V. •-• < f*%■■ . o• ■•f>•. ,nr ": >•' * •'•. > f.•«■> rj»’r»'— -If- -■ . .-’X 'V •f V'^• . . I ‘ . s> >*M.if •/ -'V* ' • v5> >> Vwf . V " • • •rm- ’tV.V- V >. ^.0...^ .- ..-Vi 4'%•■ ■ •• r. .*. ,; ■• i ’- • V.•• •' J ♦' »*'•<. ♦• ’■ ■.■''-ii*-;' •',' ••:■ !■ i__LJ •_fW''.''i. ■-■j'.’:.- .'.i* '•■• ‘4 • • • s% .• • vM ^•% r ;o\ <ttATvV^V .r.‘ '. *• ». 1* ’, C> . - * • ' 4 ' ' ' .. V Jjl? •. f'l V '\^ >■■ * j ' ■'‘a v.-fo ■• . ..'■".i: V. . . - ;^ri'; ■?;■-* •.• .■, t ^ i' • ' • Y'.« .• v r % Vv- i<-Hsa ■ V# ^ '••••• i ft • *• • : J' w*» *-<■.:■ 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLE06E AND BELIEF' DATE ' -rt ia>M ■'i' K-* ^ ^ li/..‘*». 1- *T ."J. ^ %^ •;'■. i -. y -r.# •. r: 'V'4 .VP _ J • « \\ >» % ». K.J ■>■ ■: ■ ' .• .*^ .XT V '• * ^ '*» \ • -V r^-v••f* ;. >. .^ 4 ' * (' • .t* J 4. ^ i; 4 V. • • • • . ■• A ‘ 4 i ■'. •• 1 ! ‘ > r* ' , • . ^' ■*. * 9 '■■ * •:• B# • t* ^# % • r* '♦ ' Vx * * "* * ■ #r ■* ;' »• - ' * * • n ' * f • -.V •■•. ■■ • , ; ., M * 4 , , ^ t . • 1 .\ »: t •‘' * > ■ V*4;- :•■•Jj • ■, \• '•. *■' •- • ^ :• ; ■ '■ • ' * • ■). •• ' •■' • • . ; ' * • . • l’•> ) i . > . *4 ’ •' •• • • MV . ',4 '• . . •• 4 •, . • • « V * • . L * • .,•,» , • • • • . ,•*. •• • ! •• . ■ • 4. . • “ %* : .t./ ■ ’ . N .'• •' • • • .• 'Jr *,».-• 4 • .' ■ • ■ ■ I. ‘ '• .4‘. 4^,. U * r 4 " • . > r . " . *V-: ■ ^ "•:K' • “« •• • ' ' '. i^- ' ! ^ • f ' ' • 4 • - *v v' . • • • .» rf- .4 : ■• . , . . • • m- • • • •. %; ; •4, * # . • • • %•• • * •9 • 1 w j I (we) Adjacent Property Owners’ [print name(s)] V6 i/6 7^^ ^ [print address] b have reviewed the^pto for " I'waZtlinrin execarid, Sf Ci? declare aoproval or disapproval ot ^ plans and that the proposed neighbor s Council that I (we) am (are) aware ot the nnprovem P project or use requires Council approval. Procerrv Owner• * Property Owner Date I (we) /^-rr/ [print name(s)j [print address] I («e> uB^etsund Uwi i. ss 7X “« s project or use requires Couned approval. Property Owner af£2 Date Property Owner Date ^ Z^ciBg Offi« « to the scheduled meeting date. LVV CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO a 4 4 9_____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) file #1911 WHFREAS Ernest J. Lemmemian (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the propero- located™“o TonSvlw Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "Ctty") and legally described as follows: Lot 1. Block 1. Lemmennan Addition, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal required. Minnerota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Uie City Council of Orono, findlngs This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1911. The property is located in the LR-IB. Ukeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 21, 1^9W. and May 16. 1994 and recommended approval of the proposed varian upon the following fmdings: A.A residence had e.xisted on the property. Page 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. _3_4_4_§——— . B The property has been assessed for sewer and a sewer stub is available at Tonkaview Lane for new residential construction. T AHMifJnn was created as a result of a lot line Karr'anfemL Zd™ded Lots 1 and 2 along a natural division line created by steep topographies. • • 1 7Q nrrp narcel was of an unusual shape and because of the ^pography could only be developed at either the northern or southern parts of the property. 4. The City Council finds ZpS^°S.'Z'’zZTZrfct; that ZitZh'vrjcfrZid pose a fire hazard or if necZry to alleviate a serve as a s^... r "• “ zoning Ze and Comprehensive Plan of the City. ^ 1 rnnsidered this application including the findings and<5 The City Council has consiaerea uu t,v ritv staff comments ;ruZ;"nd tt e“the°ZpZd“’variance on the health! safety and welfare of the cominunity. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER .\ND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of me above szrr n:iz^ ooZfop?^' s=»—^ subject to the following conditions; Paee 2 of 5 r9iksooso>i» CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO- 3 4 4 9 —— 4. 5. ATTEST ah residemia. constn^c.on shall be subjec. lo the legal building envelope as s ° . jj, j jq - side or 30' setback All ftmiK IpSncaV'! ^fseawns that control land alterations, tree removal and eros.on cLtrol within steep sloped or bluff areas ot property. ?=« »'.■«.«®«■■“• - expire on that date (July 11. l99o). H-:S"HS'5SSi5s?S?:i property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of July, 1994. lin. City Clerk Property Owher(s) Edward J. Call-in, Jr., Mav Page 3 of 5 r««»M ftifeOr CITY of ORONO ^ resolution of the city council NO 3 4 ------- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) u,-nc acknowled<»ed before me on this 11th day of July, The foregoing instrument 1 . ^ ^ rno.'a M"a “> and sa.d ina.mman. was e.«cu.ad on tchalf of the Citv. NmABt^PUBUC - Notary Public ss. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) -P , 199^ , before me a Notary Public On this IXl-hh_____dayot------Z”-r i r W Hf'•y / within and for fo^ping te.Snt^withinand for said County personally Srwi:ds:f “a:: ms ahelr) free acr and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of ^ 199^___, before me a Notary Public wi'ttoand for said County. "“'‘y and who executed the foregoing tasmimeni, llid- "<E*.trri“ ff. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 raaWOS &ti& • ♦ • HENNEPIN UUUN I r, iviiMNfcSsL S 4 4 9 ' 1^9, ■■;. S6^*/6 ‘06"^'• • / •< 7cr.s , y\.—*------r? • • * ^ •• ■.•■'1 _/f<nr • * ■-■.?. Pace 5 of 5 & PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING administrators REPORT («3) a #1903 ERNEST 3^ OF A LOT LINE “ 7 3VILDHURST TILUL/4620 '■ .‘■SS« - teoLunoN NO^ Mr and Mrs. Ernest Lemmerman were present. * ■ ^ .i^c iiem from the Consent Agenda was Mayor and felt diis should be commented on prior to because he received a letter rrom uic _ approving the resolutions. , ^ Mahusth comunented Oi. she had as.e^^ re-aUote’r^.^ '“o ^e r:;::-;:er ofth^ Mahusth noted the new ™“ *Ls“^I^o ^^'g°cS4sion felt they could nw^eny lot has limitations because or bluff are . because they had encouraged Lemmerm^ ,hc application on the ^“[Vof the bl^^^ “ T S proceed with his plans pnor to ^ ^^33 received, knowing there would <no« i- the bluff area, and they could then cons approval of-.building envelope. Mabusth reviewed the conceptual approval =;yS"S ; - -2 s "JS s ,S£« - h'»d been assessed to the nortnem ivl sewered lots to be buildable. H.:. m«d dus d Md.« d. cV AdOndd minvto of tbe »»» ® (#3) #1903 & #1911 ERNEST LEMMERMAN (CONTINUED) MabusO. cooTuaned wida C(cy '°'''‘°'’'- It was moved by Jabbour, seconded ^y p 97°wU^urst Trail/4620 Todcaview the lot line rearraDgement of ^ variance to permit construction of ^„rwTel"en«tr Lot1"«™an Addition for Ernest I. lemmerman. Ayes 5. nays (,4, #1937 ERIKA ANTI HERBERT F. KAHLER. 2725 RAINEY RO.AD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTIO sN no. 34-0 Mr. and Mrs. Kahler were present. Mr. Kahler ashed Council to consider the alternative resolution for a variance to build a fitU size tennis court. Mabusth e.tplained that the Ciry '■^^‘''ftom *e t« t"the'mound. Stephen that drainage will be directed to the ' j' [ ^ if the drainage were directed away Weckman agreed that a 10 ’ g^^ack acceptable. These revised grading/drainaaer sr» ™.rr,rp‘« i— the 10' setback with a smaller tennis court. S£rii'S"; s.';“ sz “ ."e driveway. A ntotion was made by Hurr. seconded by f siira^d the property located at 2725 Rainey Road Ayes 5, nays 0. S sXTmrs'iSSN'"™ Mr. Melamed was present, Mayor Callahan stated the only issue remainmg to be discussed was the park dedication fee. hardcover calculation worksheet • • 0-75 ’75-250 ’25-500 ’500-1000' ppr>pr>.<;T:D nAwncoviER A. House _ ^----------- 30 /Xoc Leoftti Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic 'i-\^1 /< 30 ) go G. Otber X X X X X X X X X 'ZZS’ "UO ^LO total hardcover in zonf total PROE-EATY ARE.A ZONE - ^ _________“ “ —— 3ri'=i xlOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. • S.F. S.F. % A B A B 13 I « : \ H * I • r %:• • • , • • *« MO iS a! O > o Q nj n (D 00 IP CP CP ) V ■ ) KtSiCovJbc fy.'\IObUC bEr&biJ • • ns»§ § M > 0 M 1 I- ns>r^ (D V CM f-4 ID Nm •• CP 0» s* • 1 • iJJ• T 1 1 a - ^■, , L •1 •^ 1! iLLVAfttN) / i. 30 TODD COURNEYAOF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. LEMMERMAN ADDITION HENNEPIN COlWrV. MINNESOTA A \. ■'VI:* V- ‘:'l ■. ■ ♦ f »i * Q9 9WItA/fioivi IbCiii P ^ I. I cncn Clo cooR(jD/A Kn H I ms CD •V CM «-l iO •-I • • •H cncn cn r-4 V. CM "I \ti1S»f>6.pr ; ;; \ t • . m •c^srXL Arae^it ^nc AiiOLsni. lor *1 A^'rrjt^r >^crcrv5cu# O^pcrur^ 1^ Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Bnglnetri & Architects CTZ 0 dorr«*ce A/ *ctfrf • ,i^f2-C •? V# • SC' ^e # Hf9lC { C*f‘r H Cc=e *C f t2:e-r 3 ^5 M c •<^t!* CS Januar/ 9, 1995 tfT * t •fe 9 f'j'S ^ *f 3 o L05«rta AC C 9w>>e« A Scwfc'’ ®€ M^e A T3 « •’A'O •-r—j. t At A C Syx«*ct. ®5 •-0*91 ^ 5/«o *i •ixrt . ®*i Vj'^ ■'At *•€ • tiu At A^i V ir»5. AC® Vc»®»l W APf*'%2h *c Vc ee C u/'x*' •* iATfl • A£ .r-*y C Ae^jicr »l Vctt ^ A*7#rfe ac • f Ar»oriO^ A* M# » t Ao**!. A| Ve*« A. lt« A| OJ'V W •.XffA? ®«v. ; ^ * A j AC A ^i.e or *fc A»*, a , Cii.v#< •? M«*« 0 ®f M«« B AC L O »f •e-T"^ C '•W T ■»“«'% A OA’Y C AtiiX' U A£ •f I»* 9 AS Oougi«« j Be^sT Af 0 CwlUSor\ At Cft w Cwf ®S Afwi o ►<€.»* A Ga^s* *2 C^«> vft A riior LA^ M Hi* #*' V G Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Buildinz and Zoning .Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crx'sial Bav. Minnesota 55323 Re; Courneya Residenc e File No. 139-1981 Dear Jeanne, We have «viev-ed the sketch plan submitted by Todd Courneya fo. 'he pr-yo«d on Lot 1. Block 1, Lemmerman Addition. The location of the house pad on the lot appears acceptable from an engineering s'andpoint. Prior to issuing a building permit, a grading plan should be prepared showtng the proposed contours, building elevations and dttvevray location. Due to *e steep 'Wjhy along the along the north prooerty line, it appears that a reiaming wall may be needed. In the future, Tonka View Lane will most likely be upgraded to a 28-foot wide 0-foot wide boulevards. The northwr ..crly corner of this lot has a 4 to along the roadway. The lot grading should be extended into *« retaining walls and Uee removal to construct the roadway will not be nearly as likely. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK Si ASSOCL‘\TES, INC Shawn D. Gnst.ifson. P E. •• •- tv#,•#-%%/ 7*^ *• ^*iri *71 ^ ST7--S5 ^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A- 'A- DATE: 1993-^*. ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1986 David Yorks. 2825 Casco Point Road - After-ihe-Fact Conditional Use Permit/V^ariance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC. Total lot area = 14,835 s.f. Please refer to staff memo of Januar>' 11, 1995 for pertinent ordinances involved in this review. Additional Exhibits Kl- Revised Plan K2- Section of Walls L - David A. Stockdale, Pres, of Edgework Builders Inc. dated 1/16/95 Brief Review of Application Applicant contacted the City in November of 1994 to advise of an immediate need to replace a retaining wall that was in a serious state of disrepair and if not replaced before spring rains would more than likely collapse into their lakeshore. Staff advised applicant of the abbreviated holiday schedule for the Planning Commission noting that the City would be unable to process a conditional use permit application to allow the installation of the wall before a January meeting. It would be impossible to install the wall during the months of January and Februaiy because of the condition of the soil. The applicant advised of an immediate emergency and need to proceed in early November to replace wall. Before staff would allow construction to begin, the applicant was advised that the City Engineer must inspect the site to confirm if there was a potential for collapse of the wall and the bank and if he concurred then applicant would provide all the necessary engineering plans and specs for his review and recommendation. The inspection was completed by both the Zoning Administrator and Mr. Gustafson at which time he cocfirmed that wall was in serious disrepair with potential for collapse. Staff also remembered that properties to the immediate west located on the same bank sustained major damage when older retaining walls collapsed during the 1987 storm. The applicant was required to file a conditional use permit before the work could commence. The original wall is constructed of timbers and was approximately 6-7 ’ in height. The current wall installed with Allan Block extends from the east side at approximately 5'A' to the west at Request for Council Action continued February 6, 1995 Page 2 of 2 il9S6 David Yorks, 2825 Casco Point Road approximately 8* in height. The City was not contacted for inspections during the period of the installation of the wall so it is impossible for the Engineer to confirm that all directives of the engineering plans for the Allan Block design wall or the City Engineer’s recommendations were adhered to. Tlie Engineer recommended that the contractor provide a letter confirming that all required steps were fulfilled in the constriction of the 8’ high wall. Review Exhibit L. David A. Stockdale of Edgework Builders, Inc. confirms that the installation was installed per the manufacturer ’s guidelines and the Bonestroo approval. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the after-the-fact application as proposed and recommended that a building permit for the construction of the wall should not have an additional penalty fee. The Planning Commission specifically noted that staff followed an appropriate proc .dure in the case of the after-the-fact application. Staff would also ask Council to comment on the procedures adopted by the City staff in dealing with an apparent emergency situation. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUT^ICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) FILE NO. 1986 WHEREAS, David J. Yorks (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 2825 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 117, Spring Park, including that part of Lakeshore Avenue, vacated, and that part of the land between said vacated avenue and the shore of Lake Minnetonka lying between the sidelines of said Lot 117 extending to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for an after-the-fact conditional use permit and variance that would allow the reconstruction of a retaining wall within the lakechore yard per Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, a conditional use permit is required for the installation of retaining walls and per Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, ai^ 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) the wall is located within the lakeshore protected area installed at a 25’ setback from the shoreline where no such strucnires are allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1986. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property consists of 14,835 s.f. or .34 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 17, 1995 and recommended approval of the after-the-fact variances and conditional use Page 1 of 5 4. permit per Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 19, 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the 5-8’ high replacement retaining wall on the property, based on the following findings: a The lakeshore lot has a steep sloping lakeshore bank and at the top or ridge of the bank an old timber retaining wall had been installed sometime in the 1950’s. b Ai the site inspection in November ol 1994, the City staff and City Engineer confirmed that the former wall was m a serious state of disrepair and needed to be replaced prior to the spring thaw and rains of 1995. c. The wall could not be replaced in the winter months because of the condition of the soils. d. If the wall was to fail, this would involve the major collapse of the applicant ’s lakeshore bank and the loss of several ^nature plantings. e. Existing mature plantings have been saved during the reinstallation of the second retaining wall providing screening from the shoreline. f. The wall has been installed per the standards set forth by the manufacturer and under the directives of the City Engineer. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to r...,,hboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right m the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zomng Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a retaining wall will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire Page 2 of 5 hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding propert>' values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), and 10.55, Subdivision 8, and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for the installation of a 5-8 ’ retaining wall that replaces a former timber wall at the lakeshore bank, subjeci ,0 the following conditions: 1.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one week of the date of Council ’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (February 20, 1995). 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automafcally terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the propeny. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of Febniary, 1995 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNIT OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of February, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor ana City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and aald instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 To: From: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 11, 1995 Subject: #1986 David Yorks, 2825 Casco Point Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permi‘JVariance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Total lot area = 14,835 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Replacement of lakeshore retaining wall requires conditional use permit. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Setback variance for retaining wall. Required Existing Proposed Variance = 75’ = 25’ + = 25’ + = 50’ 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 5,100 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 260 s.f. or 5.1% No change in hardcover proposed. 75-250’ setback area = 9,735 s.f. Allowed = 2,434 s.f. or 25% Existing = 4,209 s.f. or 43.2% No change is proposed in this setback area. 4.Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - No land alterations are permitted within the lakeshore protected area. The retaining wall is located approximately 25’ from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Mabusth Letter 11/22/94 C - Gustafson Letter 11/17/94 Zoning File #1896 January 11, 1995 Page 2 D - Gustafson Letter 1/1 5 E - Allan Block Corporation Letter 11/15/94 F - Elevations, Section, Plan G - Large Scale Section/Plan H Location Map I - Property Owners’ List J - Survey Review of Application In November of 1994, Mrs. Yorks contacted the City to advise of the unstable condition of an e.xisting retaining wall at the lop of the steep lakeshore bank at her property. She was advised by her contractor of the need to replace existing retaining wall prior to the spring thaw and rains. Mrs. Yorks was advised that there were no futu.e meetings of the Planning Commission for ’94 and that the first meeting of the year in 1995 would not be until January when it would be impossible for the contractor to proceed with retaining wall replacement. Staff advised that the City Engineer would make an inspection of her lakeshore yard to determine if there was a potential for serious collapse of the lakeshore bank based on the condition of the wall. Upon the City Engineer ’s inspection of the Yorks ’ property, he determined that there was indeed a great potential for the collapse of both wall and the steep bank. Mrs. Yorks was then advised that the City could issue no building permits until a conditional use pe;mit review was completed, but that if she had to proceed that it would be advisable that she submit a conditional use permit application and provide all the necessary information for the Engineer to complete his review of the new construction. Gustafson approved the final specs and plans submitted by the Allan Block Corporation, review E)^ibits C, E, F and G. Applicant was advised of the need to first complete the filing of a conditional use permit application and to also await the final review comments of the City Engineer before con.struction of the wall could begin. The wall was constructed sometime in late November or early December. Unfortunately, the contractor failed to ask for inspections of the project as it was being installed. The Engineer recommended that if the wall was to be installed at a height greater than 4’, additional layers and depth of geo-grid were to be used. The Er.cineer also notes in his letter of January 11th, Exhibit D, the following should have been implemented; 1. Bond beam or bridged construction in front of existing trees. 2. Granular backfill in the bridged areas. 3. 14 inches of buried block (18 inches required at increased height) Gustafson contacted the contractor who advised he was not aware that he had to call for the inspections but noted that photos were taken during the construction of the walls and that to his knowledge, based on field notes, that all of the requirements set forth in the City Engineer ’s review were carried out. As Gustafson has no way of confirming that th^. e were achieved, he Zoning File #1896 January 11, 1995 Page 3 advises that the City should require a written statement from contractor confirming that all of these had been completed as a result of the increase in height. The Building staff confirms that the contractor did provide the required erosion control during construction. It was observed from another property when completing another inspection. The Building staff was not involved in the inspection of the retaining walls as building permits were not issued nor do they routinely complete such inspections v hen the Engineer completes the structural/engineering review. The City Engineer will complete inspection involving land alterations proposed under a conditional use permit. Upon your inspection you will note that the landscaping beneath the steep banks of this wall have been protected. The wall, although close n, 7* in height at the western edge, will not be observed because of the plantings within the steep bank and also the color of the stone used is neuKal gray. Staff would caution members that if you proceed to step down the stairs to observe the wall at the base to be most cautious as the steps were slippery and difficult to descend because of the storage of portions of dock on stair structure. Issues for Consideration 1. Staff is placed smack in the middle (or our Mayor Butler would say " between a rock and a hard place") when dealing with emergency situations in the late fall of the year such as in this case. There is no way to provide the necessary land use review to meet the winter deadline. If tliis applicant was delayed to the end of January, there would be no way to ensure against the collapse of the wail and bank this spring. Staff could have advised the person to proceed on their own ai J deal with the penalties as they come but we feel it imperative that the City Engineer provide his reviev/ and guidance for the reconstruction of walls where there is potential for a serious collapse which was the c^e for this property. How would the Planning Commission advise staff to proceed with these matters? 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Planning Commission Recommendation Your recommendation to approve must include the following conditions required by staff: 1. Applicant’s contractor to submit for both City and applicant a letter confirming that all additional improvements as set fc rth by the City Engineer in his report of January 11, 1995 have been fulfilled as a re-ult of the increase in height of the retaining wall that is in excess of a height of 4 ’. 2. Applicant to obtain a building permit (and to make payment of a penalty fee?) to cover the additional costs for the inspections of the City Engineer. Zoning File #1896 January 11, 1995 Page 4 3. Others resommended of Commission Members. CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APP PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^TA> ^ Type of Application to be Filed _ ^ ____ P( 1 J pc Ui vw --------------------------------- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICANT , v/ /, T>/1'0 J. Nbl^ Address Phone (home) 4^/• "T I 4-^ Phone (work ) 4^ I -‘inCTi TD^fU^ ___Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name___________________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address City Zip. DatePropertv Acquired ______ 6/ I (do) ^do'n^ also own the adjacen FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application 5125.00 Residential Accessory Use 5200.00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ‘ ' S150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg 5250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use 5^ $200.00 Und Alteration ^ ^ ^ —Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplam Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more X Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ..................... ^ $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original ^plication) ~ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant tees) _____$250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ” $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District /J^ / ^ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). (month/year) rrrv f t i.f UMUMU u "i-Ai-rr nrzrrr f i • ; * ,‘f* ?t‘ If" 'f * ,4 w wVw t /• f rzki V J. 7i 11» vn.*V T*i“ruzrr U. I • •• L. f C T V * f w A i ' V t ■ t\kmUUMI i IliniTM f U*ts3l9760 cool liOl 7. II/: j if • U///I . 7. 8- 9. 10. required submittals X • ,/Completed Application Form. L Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of o™rs within 350’ (you can obtain this list from -----Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Plat Map. . -----Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach leeal description to application if not included on required survey. -----Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital sams) of all persons with an mterest m the -----property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Constniction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ---- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawmgs of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been mcluded. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff __________________________------------------------------------------ The^appli^ tefel^^ag^^ provide all information required or requested by the Zonmg ^druSs^m agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) "S cx;ScsTurred in review of this application, and certif.es that the mformatton supplied is true and corTecjr-'fo^e best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date ///jU/f^ mJ^Seby ^edU^d agrees to this applicauon entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, comnussion members, and Co members for purposes oLifi^tigation and verificauon of this request. Owner’s signamre Date '/uM Applicant must have all submitLilvntow City offices a^iliiytliefore the Planning Comm^oo^ scheduled SoLission Meetings are held oUe^ review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an app advise the Building & Zoning Office please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend m your p of this change prior to the meeting. e> *n\ ./o o November 22, 1994 CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address.- 2750 Ksiiey Parkway Orono. ViN 55356 Mailing Address; P 0. Box 55 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-C066 Mr. and Mrs. David J. Yorks 2825 Casco Point Road Wavzata. MN 55391 0 R£: Restoration of Retaining Wall Within Lakeshore Yard Dear Mr. and Mrs. Yorks: I have enclosed a copy of the most recent report of the City Engineer concerning tte engineering Lsitn for the replacLent of the reuining wall in your lakeshore yard. Mr. Gustafson has approved the most recently amended plan dated October 30. '994 includmg detail of elevat.on and cross section plus letter from Don Gordhaner of Allen Block Retaining Walls dated November 15. 1994. As we discussed in earlier conversations, there are no further meetings of the Plan^g Commission this year. The City Engineer hds confirmed that there ts an unmedute need to proceed with the repair of your retaining wall. You have agreed to file a condinonal uk permit/variance application before your contractor can begin ±e use application has been filed with the City and will be presented before the Planmng Commission on Tuesday, Jonuary 17, 1995. Please contact my office if you have any ftinher questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects November 17, 1994 Bonearxxlloiene.AridetUt3nclAssocl»f%.^ ts in Amrmtove Opponunty Smpicyfr Ono G BonesDDQ P€ EdDefT VI' • Joseph C Anderuk PE IVtarvnn L Sorvata PE Rchaid E Turner PE Glenn R Coo< PE Thofnas E No>«. PE RbOert G SchunchL PE Susan M Ebenm. C PA •Vn<x Consultant Howard A Sanfbid. PE PCem A Gordon PE Robert » P'p'fene. PE Picnard W Foster PE Oavid O Loikou, PE Robert C Pusse< A i A Jerry A BOUfOOn. PE Mark A Hanson. PE Michael T Raumann. PE Ted K Fieid PE Tnomas R Anderson. A i A Donald C Bungardt. PE Thomas A Sj'hio PE Frederic J StenCorg. PE Ismael Martmea. PE Michael P Rau. PE /^nes M Ring. A 1C P Thomas W Peterson P£ Mchaei C Lynch. PE James R Maiand. PE Jerry D Rertzsch. PE Scott J Aiganeic PE Kenneth P .ArxJerson PE Mark R Rdtfs. PE Mark A Seip PE Gary W Monen. PE Paul J Gannon. AIA Dan.er J Edgenon. PE A Rck Schrr;dL PE Prwio J Cas sell PE Mark D \M»iL PE Maes B Jertien. PE L Phifcp Grawer PE Karen L w^fmen. PE Gary O KrtsKjBcz. PE Keith R Yapa PE Douglas J Benoc PE Sh*^ D Gustafson PE CeciiKJ Olrvier PE Paul G Heoer PE John P Goroer. PE Chanes A EncKson Leo M PaM^ky Harlan M Olson James F Engelhard: (5 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 NOV 1 8 1994 C-.•0 Re; Yorks Residence File No. 139-gen Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the revised proposal submitted today to replace the existing timber retaining wall on the Yorks residence at 2825 Casco Point Road. We understand the urgency to do the work soon to prevent additional damage to the property. The revised plans are acceptable from an engineering standpoint and we would recommend approval. If the height of the wall changes at any time during construction, additional geogrid must be included for support of the wall. Prior to starting the work, silt fence must be installed along the shoreline for erosion control. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIA-TES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc: Dave Stockdale 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MINI 55113 • 612-636-4600 Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects Qonnttoa Aucnf. Anjfrm 4na Assoo^cex Inc 9 Af^rmsuyf Aevon^^Oij9 Opoonunfy Cmpa^ Ooo O SorrMioa •cDfi wir ioif^ • joitph C Aroet < f f L $ofv*« !■€ w'e^'* * Cco*i •£ l*>ur»«i i Nwyn ^1 •oM't G khuhcht Pi Suwr M C PA •Sf" C' A •£ «r A oe^o^ Pi ioon t •Vtrt •iC'ec vir Poite* p! Otv« O ovou. *r ■tJO#*t C P-1*ek A A j^7 A 9c-%;::n •• V#»« A H^rign f C Vicr>j# T AeutTrenn P| JK E P£ T*iQr^J • A'KTf W"' AiA 00%*^ C "^rofTMi A S/fca Pi J kriACv PS v^er Ft MThiti p me »f Agnn M tlAg. AiC • W PFiC’ysn, H C Lync-, Pi jpmfs t Ml JTil PI 0 AfW' PC kCtt J A^gerte »f Uprren p AAoenor P| Mjr% p PCTL Af vpre A SP»[V p? Gpt/ \Ar Mo'»*“ Pi J Qpnnoi-. A*A 34^'e* J eggeno*' pi A IKA Icinwo; PC P*» ‘.o J • PC Mjrt 0 PC V ti t P| L PTtio Gra^ PS. «4»rA L. pf CryO KnttC^O *C KPTA t nap Pf D0w>4l : ttAO< PS c ouujnoA pf Ctc%o C'<vEf pf p»ii' 0 M«UP* pf JCf r F OorOPf. P| CV'TS A C'Ynjor tec M Nj*vr M O'w' JA*^ • f 0 January 11, 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 6t Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 Re: Yorks Residence File No. 139-gen Dear Jeanne, On January 5th we inspected the completed retaining wall at the Yorks residence at 2825 Casco Point Road. Neither the applicant or the contractor contacted the City for inspection prior to or during construction. TTie height of the completed wall is two to five feet taller than shown on the approved plans. The plans show 4-feet of exposed wall. We had noted In our previous reviews that ”if the height of the wall changes at any time during construction, additional geogrid must be included for support of the wall.” The contractor should provide information confirming that additional layers and depth of geogrid were used to construct the wall due to the increased height. Other aspects shown on the approved plans that should have been inspected include: • bond beam (bridged) construction in front of existing trees • granular backfill in bridged areas - 14 inches of buried block (18 inches required at increased height) The contractor should provide the City with photographs taken during construction, revised plans showing changes in design and any other information that would document what steps were taken to reinforce the wall at the increased height. Because the wall was not constructed in accordance with the approved plans, the contractor should provide the City with a letter confirming this fact. Please contact me at this office If you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc: Dave Siockdale. Edgework Builders, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN SSI 13 • 612-636-4600 Allan Blocks” Edgework Builders David Stockdale, President 8301 Audubon Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 November 15, 1994 ?e: Yorks Residence, Orono, MN. Dear Mr. Stockdale, Our in-house engineering staff has reviewed the proposed segmental retaining wall which is to replace an existing treated timber retaining wall. While it is true that no failure has occurred and your proposed walls do not substantially change the current wall geometry, this does not assure future success as this assumes a static condition and futi'.re conditions could change. Furthermore the construction of said wall(s) is on an overall slope and any design can address internal and external wall stability but not overall slope stability. For these reasons we suggest the following to insure that the replacement wall not exacerbate the current stable condition. 1. All walls should be geogrid reinforced to insure internal and external stability. 2. Geogrid reinforcement will necessarily require "benching" of the reinforced zone into the existing slope geometry. 3. To insure no future changes in the soil in the reinforced zone: a. use free draining material (limited to 5% fines) in backfill/reinforced zone and leveling pad. b. place drainage tile behind the base course of block and also at base of the reinforced zone where it meets the retained soil - all tile draining to daylight. c. backfill the top 6" (below top soil) with impermeable clay soil to prevent surface drainage into reinforced zone. d. grade to prevent surface ponding above walls. 4. Because of the slope at the toe of the wall(s) it is recommended that a minimum of 2 courses of block be buried or H'/7 embedment depth which ever is greater, course buried block for the top 2'wall is adequate. One Allan Block™ Retaining Walls Allan Block Corporation • 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 185 • Edina, MN 55439 • Phone 612/835-5309 • Fax 612/835-0013 Allan Block’^*' 5. Your proposed construction procedures are appropriate. I recommend excelsior netting be dormant seeded for Spring germination of appropriate vegetation. 6. All block and grid installation in accordance with the specifications in the Allan Block Design Manual. 7. I have included the engineered wall details for the a 6'wall which represents your major wall including buried block. In summary; said walls can be constructed as designed with the understanding that design parameters are for internal and external stability only and no provision for overall slope stability. As you noted, the slope has been stable and it is reasonable to assume it will remain so if conditions do not substantially change; the most critical condition being ground water. For this reason we have recommended the above procedures which we feel will insure that no hydrostatic pressures develop and selected backfill will insure soil uniformity and performance. Said construction neither improves or diminishes the global stability of the slope but given that you will be eliminating the most probably failure scenario, your approach is entirely appropriate with the disclaimer that should the total slope fail, sail failure would likely include the retaining walls. Mr. Gustafson of Bonestroo and Associates has apparently expressed concern over the effect of the "weight" of the soils on the slope. This is a legitimate concern. I feel the existing walls suggest adequate bearing capacity and slope stability and the proposed design parameters above will improved the current situation and reduce the prospect of future failure. For the Allan Block Corporation, Don Gordhamer Technical Services copy: Shav1 Gustafson Allan Block™ Retaining Walls Allan Block Corporation • 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 185 • Edina. MN 55439 • Phone 612/835-5309 • Fax 612/835-0013 GRADE LINE P SITE DATA: WITHIN 75' SET PACK: •TOTAL AREA • STAIRS/SIDEWALK AREA • SURFACE OF OF TOP OF OPEN rPII MODULAR PLOCK WALL • NET OPEN 562PSF •223 SF 34 SP 5271 SF •PROPOSED/ EXISTING HARDCOVER PERCENTAGE WITHIN 75* SETPACR 4.65% GRADE LINE A PLAN TW 950.35' EL. 946.56* PW 945.10 ... ,.ry>j -----------GRADE UNEP LNDG. EL. 939.73^ GRADE LINE A SECTION --OHW 929.4' Edgework Builders, Inc.PCSniCPKKr A00«S5i DAVID AND PATTY YORKS 2325 CASCO POINT ROAD ORONO. MN eproi E.P. I. permlsftloit will not ba allowod Dila plan shall remain the p^roper^ of Edgework Pulldere. Inc. (E.P.I.). Any reproduction or use of thia plan without II tK m 1*bcrVT--, -> •:.; :i*i;M -.rff^’^1'*’ ''' V •, y -^'V- ■■■.> ■ S':';- ■ • ■ ' .r^; ' V- ■ •■>;.-. v;J.- » ] i ••.»s-r •*^’ *\* rr -. - w •;.*.. I*. % • •* # k 1\ ;■ •’), \^ J ■ • - "^C •• 7 @1# A •.; :j *r-J . • ‘ • < • • *• ; y: #4'1% .. . • X / J • ‘ ; . .\ - ■ 5: • •V \ . . V . V* :' I^Arf 11/07/94wrcii! 505»»■• XPROP AOOR OWER MANE taxpayer NAT«/A00R SO 20-117-75 25 0012 0277A CASCO POINT RO ROIEN A PRICE ETAL ROiEN A PRICE 277« CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 555»? HE’WEPIM CCWTY PROPERTY INPORNATIQN SYSTEM property OttlERS LIST38 20-117-25 51 000905753 CASCO AVE RIDURO L KAIL RICIURO L KAIL 3755 CASCO AVE HAVZATA IM 55391 REPORT MO. P1A3549L PAOE S58 20-117-25 51 0010 05759 CASCO AVE BRUCE 0 MADDEN ETAL BRUCE O MAOOEN 3759 CASCO AVENUE NAYZATA Ml 56591 P«op;*i)Ot OMIEl NAME taxpayer *“«irAooR pmprdor ONNEE NAME taxpa V cr NAW/AOOR 58 20-117-25 51 OOi; 00058 ADDRESS UNASSlSt^EQ DEAN V GREIHAMI DEAN V OREIMMM 5779 CASCO AVE NAYZATA m 55591 38 20-117-25 51 OOU 00058 ADDRESS UNASSlGtlEO HEIMEPIN FORPEITEO LAtfi) ClfY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/a/82 ST DEED X0I145 30 20-117-23 51 8014 00038 ADDRESS EMASSIGt«D HENNEPIN FORFEITED LA»JO CITY OF ORONO LOCAL PONOIN6 AREA 9/5/80 ST DEED 158897 38 20-117-23 51 0054 02871 CASCO POINT RO R E NOLFE R E HQLFE 2871 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA Ml 55591 58 20-117-25 51 0015 00058 ADDRESS MaSSZGNEO HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 141144 58 20-117-21 51 8057 02855 CASCO POINT RD ROSEMARY C IVERSEN ROSEMARY IVERSEN 2855 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml 55591 PROP AOOR ONNER NArc taxpaVer NAME/AODR PROP AODR OMIER name TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR .ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 58 20-117-25 51 0058 05721 CASCO AVE D R MELTY 4 N H JIN 0 R H6LTY a M n JIN 3721 CASCO AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 38 20-117-23 32 0004 02824 CASCO POINT RO FRANK H KAYLOR FRANK KAYLOR 2824 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA Ml 55391 38 20-117-23 52 0009 02821 CASCO POINT RO R E 0EM8HAR A H H DEMSHAR RONALD a MARGARET DEMSHAR 2821 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-25 51 0044 05779 CASCO AVE DEAN V GREIMANN dean V ORCIHANN 3779 CASCO AVE HAVZATA Ml 55391 58 20-117-25 32 0007 028Z9 CASCO POINT RO 8 E PETERSON a H P PETERSON 8RYCE E PETERSON ANO MARY PAT PETERSON 2829 CASCO POINT ROAD HAVZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-25 32 OOIO ■J2817 CASCO POINT RO HESt-EY C 8YRME MESLEV C BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml 55391 58 20-117-25 51 0047 02848 CASCO POINT RD CHARLES F NELSON a NIFC CHARLES a LUCY NELSON 2848 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml 55591 58 20-117-25 52 0008 02825 CASCO POINT RO OAVIO J YORKS a MITE OAVIO J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD NAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 52 0011 02815 CASCO POINT RO O a C SCANLON GENE a CATHERINE SCANLON 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD NAYZATA MN 55591 J I RUN DATE U/07/MBATCH SOSPROP AOOR OI«IER iur« TAXPAYER NRHE/A0OR 38 20-117-23 32 001202013 CASCO POINT RD J L STERN J L STERN2613 CASCO POINT DO HAVZATA m SSl^l METPJEPIM COUNTY PROPERTY IMrOWATIOM SVSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST58 20-117-23 32 001302811 CASCO POINT RO CMENOOIYN C ROSS OMEN I. ROSS 2011 CASCO POINT Ml HAYZATA TM SS301 REPORT MO. PIA35A01 PACE 436 28-117-15 32 001602687 CASCO POINT RO J H 0 P S 6AII EY JOHN N 8 PATRICIA S BAUEY 2607 CASCO POINT RB HAYZATA NT 5SS9L I I PROP ADDR Olt4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 20-117-23 32 0915 02805 CASCO POINT RO ROGER H FROfMELT 1 HIFE ROGER N FROTWELT 2805 CASCO FT RO HAYZATA m 55591 30 20-117-23 52 0014 82600 CASCO POINT RO THOMAS B KING THOMAS B KING 2800 CASCO POINT RCAO HAYZATA m 55391 56 20-U7-23 32 0617 02616 CASCO POINT RO TAmV I NOOOIS TAMMY 1 NOOOIS 2618 CASCO POINT ROAO HAYZATA m 5S391 ) ) PROP ADOR OPMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-U7-23 32 0916 0279A CASCO POINT RO LAURIE r ouzm LAURIE QUirOI 2794 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN 55391 56 20-117-25 52 6021 03799 CASCO AVE JOHN 0 ALEXANOER JOHN 0 ALEXANDER 3799 CASCO AVE MA%ZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 505 00024 I I I I I I CPRTIFY THAT THIt FACTS RFPRESFNTEO ARC AM ACCURATI AND TRUI OF HY KNOHIEOGE ANO BELIEF. OATE liSM 9^ i 1HB mm HU BOH WCBOFIlMr ?ls ^ cf Surv-sT for I>ivid \V.rVs cf ix>t 11-, -orirf: ?zrk Hennypin County, yinneoct-M Certiricate cf Survey: I her»*by certify that this is 8 true and rcrrect repre sentation cf a curvey of the bounderias of l^t 117, Spring Park, Ineludlnfi that oart cf —I^ke Shore Avenue, vacated, and that part of tho lar^ I'e- tueen said vacated avenue ar.c the shore of Lake Kinnetcnka Iving betvear. tlic aldellnaa of said Let 117 extended to the shore of Lake Minnetenks, and of the location of all buildings thereon, ■ and all visible encrocchtBents frea or on said lend. Since the original plat does net give corcplete iretne— raticnl ir.forrnatloc cn the boundaries of said lot, this survey has been based \:rcr. previcusly-existlnp iconu- rentatlrn of tho lot, ■----------^----^-rrr-------- - ^ 6C64 Scale: 1" = 30* Ikite : 9-19-75 • : Iron narker found o : Iren aarker set Gordon R. Coffin Ref* Nc Land Surveyor and Planner Lcnr Lake. Minnesota • *vj rr »rr »T *=J 4^ Z »—•O I'i ^ <) i: j >) / t: D I j ij ly •3 M z 0 V) p<oM <o . J B <0 £1dmo > 79m > PLAN 1W05034’ TW949.77’ n/9^6.ea I W 936.93*- ri E13AOJr eW£>4235f- EL 943.52* 0W944.1*- £1945.2/ SECTION C'C SECTION S-S SECTION A-A SIt Edgework Builders, Inc 8aOIAUOVIONItaAO«CHANIIASSEH.MM }S117 »SOnMk DAVID AND PATTY Y0JU;5 2625 CASCO POINT ROAD OKONO. MN ©Thl» pUn •h«U tha fraMiiy of Ea«eMirkMklff«wln0.rE.bJ.V Any repfoiuctioo or OM of tmjMO oltiioX £.5. L winton MHi4ooioM.Mil not ko AmmI U<UMjtiMrixe<l uoo ohM ofititlo E.OJ. tootf 4wiut)roe«ii»«J ky ouoh aoorkwidMf proparotloN oiul attxerm/* feco.47J-7007 iKU 10/30/94 REV 1.1195 .VSK,-tr..10/26 EEX3EW0RK BUILDERS, INC. 8301 AUDUBON ROAD • CHANH.A.SSEN. MN 55317 PHONE (612) 368-351J FAX<612) 368-3550 4- January 16, 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Yorks Residence File No. 139-gen Dear Ms. Mabusth, Please review attached documents. They Include. 1 . A site plan with field verified elevations and sections as noted. 2. Supporting documentation from me engineering f' This information verifies mat me walls, as built more man meet me engineering requirements for this project 3. Correspondence letter from BRAA to you dated Nov. 17.1994. (My Interpretation of mis letter was mat If me wall got higher make sure additional geogrid re-enforcement occurred. This was done.) If you or omer staff members had intended to Ptease construction. I apologize. It was not dear to me mat this desired. Please understand that me installation was accordance wim the manufacturer's Installation guidelines and BRAA stair approval. If you have any questions, please contact me at your earliesf convenience. Sincerely, David A. Stockdale President "Masters of Quality Construction" w \ > REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION < DATE: January 3f, ITEM NO.= 5 Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1987 Larry Pillar, 2705 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC Total area of property = 15,000 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 (B) - Side yard setback variance. Required = 10 ’ Existing = 6 ’ (Principal structure located 4.7 ’ from side lot line) Proposed = 6 ’ Variance = 4 ’ or 40% Brief Review of Application For more detail on this review, please refer to the staff memo enclosed dated January 11, 1995 and the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 17, 1995. The applicant commenced repairs of three season porch without the required building permit. The applicant advised that he began to make repairs to the foundation and decided to replace the foundation. With foundation repairs he then proceeded to replace the stud walls and siding. The current renter advised of a leak in the porch roof and then when inspected for repair. Pillar decided that it too should be replaced. The applicant estimates that the three season porch was approximately 50 years old. The structure not only serves as a three season porch but as the main rear entry to the residence and provides internal access to the basement level. Because of the existing floor layout and the windows to the immediate south, the addition could not have been reinstalled the additional 4 ’ to meet the 10 ’ setback from the side lot line. As already noted, the applicant does not reside at the property and has not for five years. The construction was begun in the late fall and has been worked on off and on until the Stop Work Order was issued. The applicant advised that the work was conducted over a series of weekends and there was no attempt to hide or rush to complete construction. 9 . Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 January ?1, 1995 #1987 Larr>' Pillar, 2705 Ethel Avenue The hardships are reviewed as follows: 1 The location of 50 year old house on property installed prior to current zoning standards. 2 There is no visual impact on adjacent residence that would receive most impact. 3. The 14’ unimproved alley provides an additional butfer to the residence to the north receiving most impact. 4. The structure provides an internal enclosed access to basement level and the rear of residence. 5. If unimproved 14’ alley was vacated, this property would receive benefit of the entire 14’ right-of-way because the alley was dedicated with the platting of the Casco Heights plat in 1911. The Planning Commission unanimously approved a side setback variance as proposed based on the applicant’s hardships as noted. Thev conditioned approval on applicant obtaining a penalty building permit as soon as Council had completed the review of the application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 1987 WHEREAS, Larry D. Pillar (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2705 Ethel Avenue within the City of Orono a..d legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10,25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a 10.9 ’ x 15.3’ three season porch to the rear of the residence that will be located 6’ from the side lot line where the code would require a 10 ’ setback. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1987, The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property consists of 15,000 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 17, 1995 and recommended approval of the variance as proposed based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. The location of the 50 year old house on the property that was installed prior to current zoning standards. B. The principal residence is located 4.7 ’ from the side lot line. The three season porch addition is located 6’ from the side lot line and will encroach no closer. Page 1 of 4 C. There is no visual impact on the adjacent residence to the north. Q 'j'fjg j4’ unimproved alley provides an additional buffer to the residence to the north receiving most impact from the strucmre located 6’ from the side lot line. E. If unimproved 14’ alley was vacated, this property would receive the benefit of the entire 14’ right-of-way because the alley was dedicated with the platting of the Casco Heights plat in 1911. F. Strucmre has existed on the property for over 50 years. G. The strucmre provides an intemal/enclosed access to the rear of the residence and to the basement. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a 10.9’ x 15.3 ’ three season porch addition to the rear of the existmg residence, subject to the following conditions; Applicant shall make application for a building permit for a three season porch by Monday, February 20, 1995. The building permit fee shall be subject to an additional penalty fee as original construction was commenced without a permit. Page 2 of 4 1. ^ • 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain ot Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1995. ATTEST; 4. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of February, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator January 11, 1995 SUBJECT: #1987 Larry Pillar, 2705 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, area of lot 15,000 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 250-500’ setback area = 15,000 s.f. Allowed = 4,500 s.f. or 30% Existing = 3,822 s.f. or 25.4% Proposed = 3,822 s.f. or 25.4% No variance required. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 - Strucmral coverage. Allowed = 2,250 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,709 s.f. or 11.3% Proposed = 1,709 s.f. or 11.3% No variance required. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Side yard variance. Required = 10’ Existing = 4.7’ Proposed =4.7’ Variance = 5.3* or 53% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Neighbors’ Acknowledgment Form E - Foundation Plan/Conceptual Elevation F - Hardcover G - Survey Description of Request The applicant commenced foundation repairs of a three season porch and proceeded to replace wood frame walls and roofing. All of the work commenced without a building permit. The project was shut down by the building staff. When a survey was obtained by the owner, it was Zoning File #1987 January 11, 1995 Page 2 discovered that the existing structure is only 4.7’ from the side lot line, review Exhibit B. A 14’ unimproved alley separates the property to the immediate north. Upon your inspection note the privacy fence installed within the unimproved right-of-way. The neighbor to the immediate nonh has provided an acknowledgment form and has voiced no concern with the proposed reconstruction of the three season porch in its fonner envelope. The three season porch is 10.9’xl5.3’. The structure not only serves as a three season porch but provides an enclosed entrance to the lower level basement. Pillar began to make repairs to foundation and decided to replace the foundation. With foundation repairs he found the smd walls and sidins needed replacement. The renter advised of a leak in the porch roof and when the roof was insnected for repair decided that it too should be replaced. Applicant advises ba.ed on the approximate age of the house and the condition of the structure that the three season porch had probably existed for fifty years on the property. Mr. Pillar, the applicant, is the owner of the property but does not reside at the residence. The structure is a rental property. The owner resided at the property approximately five years ago. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A, hardships are reviewed as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Location of fifty year old house on property that was installed prior to current zoning standards. There is no visual impact on adjacent residence. The 14’ unimproved alley provides an additional buffer to the residence to the north receiving most impact from the structure located 4.7’ from the side lot line. The strucmre has existed on the property for over fifty years. The structure provides an intemal/enclosed access to basement level. If unimproved 14’ alley was vacated, this property would receive benefit of the enure 14 richt-of-way because the alley was dedicated with the platting of the Casco Heights p a in 1911. Issues for Consideration 1. Could structure have been rebuilt on property meeting required side setback of 10’? On your inspection note location of windows to immediate south of the three season pore.. Also internal access to basement is through this portion ot residence. Zoning File #1987 January 11, 1995 Page 3 2. Oth^r issues raised by Planning Commission. Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that applicant make payment for a penalty building permit to allow completion of construction. Members should be aware that the building official has accepted the foundation plans and other information submitted with variance application as acceptable and complete for a building permit application. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-confonning structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r-TTv ri CA I f Cl ____ w» » X Cl. r CMUITW rC-TrC H50 200000 01 :£V Cash TL ! t ^ w • VOvr } : ! U.M. PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address I'^O b ^Ihifc Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)'jLo-ui-^3- oo/i — X •: i f f K'‘.• f -. f ' ! J -Tw-.'-ru*V CWX rW'A f- < i ■ i X.' . Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired________ / 9 ___________________ I (do) (§onot]) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X" residential ___other (specify)_________ Zoning District:_________/C- _____________________ (month/year) 9;ihiL SS Address: As:?? Cc.-e Clt^ r^Oo,K.P________Zip: OVVNER (if different than applicant) Name 7^ ________ Phone(home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: *7 '>OG Estimated Construction Cost $ S^- - KCrC^tvf-'rilt~cU( 'i (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difflcu^ or unusual prorcrty conditions preventmg ''-mpliance with Zoning Code requirements: ^ Cx^AllQ/^__----------iL ^0 ',y^DAcX (^pnance wil A/A5 tfTrJCn 1 h:^ V T fi jL/l^y 'T'O <^r') }^y\0\^ /-/(V^g- 70 (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^0 JP^• s REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application_deadUn^ ^ate in order for vour application to be considered completes 1. 2. 3. 4. Completed Application Form 77*Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Jfennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). "^Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. - a Topoeraphic surv'ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existmg grade ““are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'A." x 11" for reproduction.^ •/"^Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8>A" x 11"). “7List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant- and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information h^ not been intpluded^ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. variance APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . u -r The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in r^ew.of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true iiAa correct tj thq J^t of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE " . ui The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property bv City staff, copullAn^ apnts. Commission members, and Council members for purposes ojinvestigation ^nd jve^^ation of this request. Owner’s Signature f Date //-10^ V Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 23 days before the Planning Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ApplicLts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planmng Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meetmg, please m^e arrangments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zomng Office o this change prior to the meeting. 8 RUN DATE 12>^1/9A BATCH 002PROP ADOR ONN€R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OHTJER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR r PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR r .r r PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM • . PROPERTY OHNERS LIST*vSB 20-117-2S 24 0001 02464 CASCO POINT RD D L RUNKLE ALT RUNKLE DAVID L RUNKLE 2464 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55ST1 S6 20-117-23 24 0013 02700 ETHEL AVE JULIA S JENSEN JULIA S JENSEN 2700 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0014 02745 ETHEL AVE BENJAMIN R JENSEN BENJAMIN JENSEN 2745 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0020 02750 CASCO POINT RD DALE A CHRISTENSEN A HIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0040 02720 ETHEL AVE JOHN NAYNE A JOYCE E HAMBLET JOHN H A JOYCE HAMBLET 2720 ETHEL AV HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0044 02491 ETHEL AVE MICHAEL 0 REVIER MICHAEL 0 REVIER 2491 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 • • % • s . 02705 ETHEL AVt LAMRENCE 0 PILLAR, lahrence d pillar ■" 0827 CARDINAL COVE OR HOUNO MN 55S0A 58 20-117-25 2A OOOA02086 CASCO POINT RD 0 L RUMCLE A L F RUWLE OAVIO L RUNCLE 2080 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m 55S0I 58 20-117-25 24 0014 .<4 ■ f • . •• fV\ Vi 36 20-117-23 24 0017 02755 ETHEL AVE SONCOR INVESTMENTS SAN CAR INVESTMENTS PO BOX 574 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 36 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RD C H A B J PALMER CURTIS H A BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA m - 55391 v; 36 20-117-23 24 0044 02494 ETHEL AVE JANET C KAUFFMANN JANET C KAUFFMANN 2494 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 * J » • • • > TOTAL BATCH 002 00014 ‘S ^ . i r ' *■ ‘ . I. ■ •*' t , A' . • • •• • *7 1*4 ,* ■ » *f,. REPORT NO. PAGE58 20-117-25 24 001002740 ETHEL AVE L L VICKNAIR I R L VICKNAIR LArCE L A RHOOA L VICKNAIR 2740 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA m 55541 58 20-117-25 24 0015 02725 ETHEL AVE 6 P A O L L0RSUN6 G P A 0 L LORSUNQ 2725 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA m 55541 58 20-117-25 24 0014 02750 CASCO POINT RO . DALE A CHRISTENSEN A HXFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA HN 55341 58 20-117-25 24 0022 02700 CASCO POINT RD 0 P BUSSING A L R RUNNING DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING 2700 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m 55541 58 20-117-25 24 0045 02647 ETHEL AVE C GORDON AMUNDSON ET AL C GORDON AMUNDSON 2697 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 1.4 ■ 'S V, *'; fm iii RUN OAT€ 12/01/94 BATCH 002 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE*r-: -V • . \^ »* • . f«* f • • i% ••<.’• ■'•f.' 5' » ... >: • • ♦ ■ •j ; ••'■- •" . -V r< 'y .‘■i'T: I I r f • i .• r . ... V:. ...SV.if • : / • • ’ t. ' .■ * * * •/ t t • _• ^ , . • ' '■. •t . ". '.'.^ ••■'■■,'i ri‘K'a) . >^<w\; ■'•'vAi i • i •r^: »■ ,. 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEMTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTWNT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF. , * N,« uV- - * y? « ..: -v;' *• * • * r- » !■•• « • ». ■r . •» » <' t • • JI * I A • » . . .Lv,; ; .•t' ' ' / • • **./ *f .• •* \* t<•«'A'i.«'"•» j’- . . 1 ••»•.*•R *• ; ■.'*.• ' • * / •• : ->!• y ' yr 0AT€"3uu ;t. » Y - /• < ^ # & • ' '• ( V ■. = y:» 1• ^ . .•p s, • * .*•; j 4 u*‘ •» .V * ‘ ^^^ • V(s': ('t -• • / ■ -* •• •* A*. L- n; ' • lifey 1 fM.v-jij I Vrn:\r. .‘vv V-' (30) V'(24)M)(>2)v<i»(34) tomENS CASE 16624 (36) rr jF lOI 14 .VV (42) tAsio POINT Z0-m-Z3 ’2H 45 f ?’S <2 1}^ 91 15 I? 4 9\?4o >3 TTf (30)66 ? • 5 t6 • M • XV (0 40 I 40 il ‘ro »(;5)' (19) ///y/ /, T“ I - no. Z r.# ^ Z5 'smsMiP^s smimm of LOTI, SmtHC ^ASnC'm omsion • hw A .•i • % Y^//////^//v J X;........ • \ (4) ix c //\''^ \ < vsf X:--/ » % .(45).V/'V> -V E "sissils moiTism Of SfUIMG fJUfIC LOTS • • ^ " r. > fV ,w.(25) >(33 ‘) • /, W* fi is .''(34) . < 4 '> .C^ V'5 '‘V."'lo fss'^'r fjK** flK* (5) (41) ■•4% ^ 9 '^//'> - • -4 S/ s>•V n'.s .«»4.L /DAdiacent Propem Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) //AAU'^k^^ — [print name(s)] q,7^rig^ /iLza^A [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the prq)^ located 0 ^ referred to as Land Use Application No. jH- I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for |he City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires^^itmciLatiproval. X9/- __ Piroperty Owner Date Property Owner Date ♦ ♦♦******x>#**************»********’*'**’***’^****** *##*#*♦♦**♦*•****♦♦**♦**♦**♦♦** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located also referred to as Land Use Application No.________ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not “■“Jl, “ ?oundl rtT(l7a^t'rawtfofL'’taTr^^^^^^ " project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If vou have anv information that may assist the City in the review of this ^d Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 ays pnor to the scheduled meeting date. - V-HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. H ouse LENGTH B. Garage ] c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other WIDTH X - X // /3 . X . X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 500-1000' ISHO S.F. jtso S S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F.in ^ _ S.F. . S.F. _ S.F. « S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F.l‘oOOO £ 3 ^ [TU5M2_ X100 - % i:xisti;iH 1)C!;(M-ipt ion Lots 1 and 2, Block i, Casco Heights. This survey shows the location of an existing house on the above described pro[)crty. It does not [>urport to show any other improvements or encroachments. it'.S r • : Iron inarkci IOiind o: Iron marker set - /4,810i Ja.fr ( ) 1 hereby certify thnl this survey \v>is prepared by me or under mv direct super- | uaiE 9~ 1!^ •'9^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " y / DATE: Febtuai^i^ '* ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1988 Kenneth J. and Eileen F. Severinson, 2800 Shadywood Road Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Approximate area = 39,000 s.f. (majority of property is located within 0-75 setback area at approximately 29,500 s.f. Description of Request Please refer to the staff memo dated 1-9-95 and the minutes of the meeting for more background on the review of this application. Tlie applicant installed new sections of 6-7’ privacy fence and repaired other sections of fencing without the benefit of a building permit review. At the time of the building permit review prior to construction, staff would have advised of the need for variance approvals. The fencing runs along the channel and adjacent to the County street yard. The Code would allow privacy fencing along the County road or street lot line of the lakeshore lot but the majority of the street yard of this property is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. In fact, the entire fence is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicant notes he was completely unaware that a building permit would be necessary to reinstall the fencing. Please review Exhibit A-1 that notes the unique findings and hardships to support the variance request. They are reviewed as followed: 1 The Narrows Channel is a heavily trafficked channel connecting the lower lake and the upper lake. There is a need for both a visual and noise buffer from the boat traffic and sounds of boaters that pass through the channel. 2. 3. 4. The channel is heavily trafficked both in the summer by boaters and the winter by snowmobilers. Many private properties along the channel within the City of Orono have similar privacy fencing. Elimination of the fence could potentially result in the reduction of the value of the property. Request for Coun''»l Action continued February 6, 1993 Page 2 of 2 . . r> • #1988 Kenneth J. and Eileen F. Severinson, 1800 Shady wood Road 5. 6. 7. 8. The property is located directed across from the Tonka Bay Fishing Park where the public is allowed to fish. Fencing helps to define the private property along the channel from the public fishing areas. The fence provides a noise protection and visual protection from the public who fish in the park. The park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing throuehout the entire summer. The majority of the area of this property is located within the lakeshore protected area where no structures are allowed. The total area of the property is 39,000 s.f. The area within the 0-75’ setback area is 29.500 s.f The property is surrounded by the lake on the north and the east and by the County road on the south. Orono Code would have allowed a privacy fence within the street yard of the property as it is adjacent to heavily trafficked County road but code would not allow such a structure within the 0-75’ setback area. Planning Commission Action The majority of the Planning Commission (5-2) voted to approve the variai. “ application as proposed based on the hardships and unique findings set forth in applicants’ addendum and conditioned approval on ^pplicsnt obtaining 3 penalty building permit. The minority opinion felt that had applicants followed appropriate procedures that the City could have considered other options such as a combination of a lower fence with shrubs. Applicants noted that there already exists plantings to the lakeside of the fence. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQLTISTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCt TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) FILE mm WHEREAS, Kenneth J. Severinson and Eileen F. Severinson (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2800 Shady wood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1196, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the Citv for a vt hnce to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the r . ,svtr,ction of a 6-7’ fence located within 5’ of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka where sucii .-.uaciure must be located 75’. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1988, 2. 3. The property is located in the LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 39,000 s.f. or .89 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 17, 1995, and recommended approval of the variance as proposed based upon the following hardships and unique findings: A. The Narrows Channel is a heavily trafficked channel connecting the lower lake and the upper lake. There is a need for both a visual and noise buffer from the boat traffic and sounds of boaters that pass through the channel. -f Page 1 of 5 B. 4. C. D. E. The channel is heavily trafficked both in the summer by boaters and the winter by snowmobilers. Many private properties along the channel within the City of Orono have similar privacy fencing. Elimination of the fence could potentially result in the reduction of the value of the property. The property is located directed across from the Tonka Bay Fishing Park where the public is allowed to fish. Fencing helps to define the private property along the channel from the public fishing areas. F The fence provides a noise protection and visual protection from the public who fish in the park. The park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing throughout the entire summer. G. The majority of the area of this property is located within the lakeshore protected area where no strucmres are allowed. The total ^rea of the property is 39,000 s.f. The area within the 0-75 ’ setback area is 29,500 s.f. H The property is surrounded by the lake on the north and the east and by the Countv road on the south. Orono Code would have allowed a privacy fence within the street yard of die property as it is adjacent to heavily trafficked County road but code would not allow such a structure within the 0-75 ’ setback area. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to a leviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a subsmtial Property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spint and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 5 The City Council has considered this application includiiig the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS Ba^ed upon one or mote of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision I (B) to permit the reconstruction of a b-T privacy fence located approximately 5 ’ from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, subject to the following conditions: 1 Applicants shall complete the application for a building permit the reconstruction of the fence by Monday, February 13th. Such permit shall be subject to a penalty fee. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only. 3 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4 The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of February, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City ^lerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 • -1 * ‘ ^ " » STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_______________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared--------------------------^^--------— known to me to be the person(s) described m and who exwnited the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 To:Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 9, 1995 #1988 Kenneth J. and Eileen F. Severinson, 2800 Shadywood Road - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB ^ • u- n u iApproximate area = 39.000 } f. (majority of property is located within 0-75 setbacic area at approximately 29,500 s.t.) Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Setback variance required for reinstallation of new sections of privacy fence adjacent to channel at southwest side of property. = 75’ = 5’ (measured from seawall at Narrows Channel) = 5’ = 70 ’ 2. Required Existing Proposed Variance Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (E & F) - Allowed accessory structures within lakeshore protected area: lockboxes, stairways, lifts and landings. Fencing is not allowed within protected area and requires variance approval prior to installation. List of Exhibits A - Application A-1- Applicant’s Addendum B - Property Owners’ List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Adjacent Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Forms F - Hennepin County Public Works Acknowledgement Form G - Dennis Bailey of Hennepin County Public Works Letter Description of Request A 6-6'/2’ high privacy fence bjis existed on this property for over 15 years. It is located approximately 130' along the channel side and 60+’ within the west street y^ the fencing were either repaired or replaced sometime withm the summer of 1994. ™ newly constructed ence was observed by the Inspection staff. The applicant was advised of the need to apply for a variance. Zoning File #1988 Januar>' 9, 1995 Page 2 The fence located approximately 5' from seawall at the channel side and has been reinstalled at the same setback as the previous fence. The entire fence is located within the 75’ setback area. The applicant has provided 1988 photos of the former fencing taken at the time of an appraisal of the property. Photos have been provided showing the newly re installed/repaired fence and will be available at your meeting. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A-1. Hardships are reviewed as follows: 1.The Narrows Channel is a high traffic inlet/outlet between the Lower Lake and the Upper Lake. There is a need for both visual and noise protection from the noise of the boat traffic and sounds of the boaters that pass through the channel. 2.The Channel is heavily trafficked both in the summer by boaters and the winter by snowmobilers. 3. 4. The remaining private propenies along the channel have similar privacy fencing. Elimination of the fence would significantly reduce the value of property. 5.The property is located directly across from the Tonka Bay fishing park where the public is allowed to fish. Fencing helps to define the private property along the channel from the public fishing areas. 6.The fence provides noise protection and visual protection from the public fishing in the park. The park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing du’oughout the entire summer. 7. The majority of the area of this is located within the lakeshore protected area. Any recommendation of approval must include the requirement that applicant obtain a penalty building permit for repair and installation of new fencing within lakeshore yard. i CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-c ^nfonning structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address_____2800 Shadwood Road. Orono. MN _____ Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) 21-117-23-13-0023-36 riTv r*r r+: *A;ri Li I I WP'WtU*;• V;; .K i rr rr r * “r 1J:'0200000 ;n'T# 200. CC OOO.iiO Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired July / 1993 ixiCElPT-you (mo^year^'■•‘■i ROi TiC I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property : x residential ____other (specify) Zoning District:_________________________________ a*-' APPLICANT Name Kenneth J. & Eileen F. Severinson Address: 2800 Shadwood Road OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Same As Above_____ Rione (home) 471-0262_____ _____ Phone(work) 337-1826_____ City: Orono______________Zip: 55331 Phone(home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:____ Estimated Construction Cost $ 1/200 See Attached (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore K Other (specify) Approval of Fence Repaired/Replaced HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg compliance with Zoning Code requirements__________________________________ See Attached _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1 Q S n All of the following infnnnation must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. X Completed Application Form X Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). X Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/i" x 11" for reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8‘A" x 11"). 8. 9. X List of the lesal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant- and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that youE variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE u rr • The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tri^^and corre^ to t|ie best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Sigriature OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees t^rfhis application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, apnts. Commission members, and Council members for purposes ^.^jirfvestigation ai^'i'erification of this request. DateOwner’s Signamre Applicant must havialilsfemtt^ imotS^ offices 25 days before the Planning Co^ssion Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. AppUcants must be present at aU scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arra^^ents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zomng Office ot this change prior to the meeting. 8 / ATTACHMENT TO VARIANCE APPLICATION KENNETH AND EILEEN SEVERINSON nr?;CRTPTION OF REQUEST; Request for variance for repair and partial replacement of privacy/noise abatement fence (the "Fence") along side (East) and rear (South) of our residence. The Fence is at least 15-20 years old and suffered damage from frost heaves and lack of general maintenance. The Fence is parallel to the narrows and between Lafayette and Carmen Bay across from the Tonka Bay Fishing Park and in front of the Narrows Bridge on Shadywood Road. The residence was purchased and remodeled with permit, after purchase in July, 1993. The Fence was repaired and partially replaced in June, 1994. A variance was not requested since we were not aware it was required to repair and/or replace an existing fence. HARDSHIP DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY_CONDITIONS; The following is a summary of unusual property conditions which we believe are pertinent. 1.Our property is located directly on the West side of the narrows channel between Lafayette Bay and Carmen Bay on Lake Minnetonka. The narrows channel is a high traffic inlet/outlet between the lower lake and the upper lake. The Fence, which is wood with vertical slats (stockade type), is approximately 6 to 6-1/2 feet high, provides significant noise protection from boat traffic and boaters going through the channel (see attached photo's) in summer and from snowmobile traffic in winter. It also provides significant visual privacy for our back yard and side yard from passengers on boats and snowmobiles going through the narrows. Other private property on the narrows channel have similar fencing. We understand the Fence was initially built to provide privacy and noise protection. Elimination of the Fence would significantly reduce the value of our property. 2.Located directly across from our property is the Tonka Bay Fishing Park (see attached photo). The Park allows for fishing along the East side of the narrows channel from under the Narrows Bridge all the way to the Northeast point of the narrows (all other property on the narrows, including ours, is private and are non-fishing areas). The Fence provides noise protection and visual protection from people fishing in the Park. The Fence also assists in the enforcement of posted no fishing zones on our side of the channel. The Park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing throughout the summer. Elimination of the Fence would reduce the privacy of our property, increase noise levels, and accordingly, reduce the value of our property. We respectfully request approval of this applica granting of an appropriate variance. t\ “4IDATE' 11/2 t/9A ,^•^V-'iv:-, •:,,,: 'i?.•''■•»'.••'B^TCH 00* ;, ;'': '(•*HErt^EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OI>tlERS LISTPROP AOOR f '21-117-23 13 0023 02600 SHAOYHOOO RDvfcww • rw 0»t4CR NAME / ,K SEVERZNSON « E F HOFFMAN TAXPAYER V KENNETH SEVERINSON t,NAME/A00R. I'l'ESOO SHAOYHOOO RO W "' '* EXCELSIOR FW 55531 »•»*'* ’• * ’ 4JI-117-23 2^ 0040 PROP AOOR *" 02760 SHAOYHOOO RO ^ l^'ONNER NAHC . A J KLOTSCHE A J A KLOTSCHE ^ ) ALLAN J « JUDITH A KLOTSCHE Kif^ KANE/ADOR'v 2760 SHAOYHOOO RO - /I -»f 'v ; t • • . 5%';.W if^.St’PROP AOOR • jHilfW" »«« Je^^TAX*»AYER OS^-^NAME/AOOR .-V V f... ; ^ » 30 21-117-23 31 0002 02795 SHAOYHOOO RO S R I P A BECK STEVEN R t PEGGY A BECK 2795 SHAOYHOOO RO EXCELSIOR HN 55331 : %y: vimi:gf--'Ar-'' **. -1/V,tI• >' vVj h ■■.*•* .•;/ Kk%/>..yi,:V:. '•'V f . /.V,*•i.N-REPORT NO. PI435401 ^ PACE 14 : ##.38 21-117-23 24 000902775 tmOYHOOO RO B K OLr TT.USTEE BONNI*^ K OLSON 2775 SHAOYWOOn PO EXCELSIOR MN ^5331 38 21-117-23 24 0041 , 02780 SHAOYHOOO RO H R HITTKER ASK HITTHER H R HITTMER ASK HITTMER 2780 SMADYHOOO RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 97 21-117-23 13 0017 00097 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT OF HAY SECTION 320 HASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 * I* '■ v*- ■ •• •' •• ^fv •* » ' •' F • 38 21-117-23 24 003500038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED S R A P A BECK STEVEN R A PEGGY A BECK 2795 SHAOYHOOO RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 A'* f .A * • ' '*% ,• \' •.** *f* I • • ( K t v< .. • ‘ • • » ..• *• 38 21-117-23 24 0054 02785 SHAOYHOOO RD ^ • ••.t-.V-J ••■• •V-' C f ■ T J CASCY S S 0 CASEY ' . s V y. - THOMAS J CASEY • • •., .?..V.; : . ; , > •., ^ 2785 SHADY HOOO PO .; > • . v' * ;;*V EXCELSIOR MN 55551>; I- . ^: ■ .. yfA'''. : *• , * --w •'* A. .* • • t v>'r «••■•;».• ■<.; <■ Y.- • ’ ,;f'?Vy: •• •! -■ ' ;gr J ft , •■;;.■ • : -t TOTAL BATCH ' oo* oonim /j . ‘>V. - ; '‘J h . • • U. 006 00008 ..‘/V • ' * •- a •<'V: ' ■ :'.i\ •••■- . .•» i . • • - • ■ • • • • - * •• f-: ' ■ • ■ . ;• .•'ir'-.’, >’*■• y-‘•• ■. ‘ -■ ■•''•■■'• f \ ‘ i". V' if . * ^ ‘ •’ *’ 'v ***'•.' : ‘ T* - •' .f ‘ •• • TK .. t ‘ ♦ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ' REPRESENTATION OF XNFORHATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFMEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDCE AND BELIEF. , • • ; ^ j j DATE 1. ^ * .. }’» • J .*• ** ' p"'. * T t X ‘ • ■ i .. ■ i. *• * *. ; V • I'.. ' • '*» . • ;.• " *: • »• A . .*• 1 / •'’i' . 'i'*/ ' ’ •* ' * ,-! *! 7>y *•,' • V i'.’i y.- - ^ • v*. • I V •*;* ,•• !• ' , I r. . .;-Vv . . •■•• > ■ *♦ * hJ M INNE TONKA / > .?'T'y''iS ~ ^ ^1 Cr>c*>»• \\ju*^ Ur c'^vi t certify thfit in occor dnnce wi tt» the provisions of Cjxfpler *^00, //i rn..-so la Stofiites of 1949 as ‘..nded, I havr turvey^il the f o I I owi nt| descr i bed tract of^f^d in the County of Hennepir and State'of M;.nnopin, except the lion f hwester I v ?'f oe t of ‘ ^^-MJ..tror of 7,tlos, County ejinootj-on of^ said survey. ■ /Ary"!" ted th»s__ dov of A.T] l Iher.^rhHo^t^ir^y.'•■'-.so,a, a, . Surveyor - A\innesota Reeji stro t i on No, 6122 c^noo Villd(je Council of ureno, Aiur.esota hy_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mavor Clerk ■ CA 1 w ^0 t ^ ' Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) of 7'^ [print name(s)l [print address] have revic^j^e plai^^the proposed improv^cn^or ^oposed use^of th^ro^ny located I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use out merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. P'operty Owner /- -r - Date Property Owner I (we) ^ [print name(s)] Date [print address; [IS. for Ui<of the property located I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not “^ed to project or use requires Council approval. /9 9s~^ :> Property Owner Site DateProperty Owner If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this ^se Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zomng Office at least 10 ays p to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) AS of 27^P ^ftAuaJ [prim name(s)][print address] have reviewed ihenl; at ^l^OOSWl^L I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for \he City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plariS and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. / {)- 7- Property Owner 1/ Date Property Owner ***********:*i* *♦**♦*******♦*♦•**•' I (we) ^ P/f- Date [print name(s)l of ^79^ [print addres§] rty locatedhave reviewed- the plans for proposed improvement or proposed use of thyiro^rty at referred to as Land Use Application No. CZUL----• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Prope ner Date DareProperty Owner App"ci;^n.TaseTub“Touf=oll™^^ z“niTg kasUO pri“ to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) _______of ^7 [print aamc(4) [print address/ have reviewed the plans fo5 the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property ’ or use but merely to ccnfirm for die City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council approval. y-fr Date /- f Date of a-is-r [print address] located [print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed impre . . at 0^0 also referred to as Und Use Application No. /7Q£-' I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner ^c "bu W Zo“ci^' iLuO pri” to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) 3 ^ ^ ^ [prini nine(s)] [pnul address] O’SfJ have reviewed the plans fox the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at refeiTed to as Land Use Application No. __• I (we) understand that in executing this aclcnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for ^.c City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner ***********^*****^*^*^^**^*******************************-******************** I (we) Hbatub P/m CouAjTy PusuL V/7 AJ . f/n’fe5f,—^ [print name(s)] (pnnt address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of *e property located at %S(5b SfMOVuxoO J(£&0 also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use bur merely to confirm for die City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor project or use requires Council approval. ■PFoperty Owner- CoAJ56<lJWr/pO Uon JQ___Property- Owner Date y , V. /9?s 3VS V3/S If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Lan ^ Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least ays p to the scheduled meeting date. (5' <rf^ ,^-.Z^,n'tutj6^ a*i i^tJle, <*~*^ cu^uyi^^jrunf^ ^zL- €X^ id Adjacent Propc^ Ojmcrsj Acknowledgement Form I (we) C4\/ I'it' -fn r ^ • (prim ndffle(s)] [P™t address) /f, j. have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Y- ^ ^ if ly also referred to as Land Use Application Nc. ----. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Date * lii m ‘ Property' Owner I (we) HeKTKBPf.^ Cou^Jjy Pu6^!(~ ^g<r^of V/7 ^ [print name(s)l [pr^tt address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at XSci ttmiuMC'C !(c^0 also referred to as Land Use Application No _/7 0 J—• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare aporoval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm me Oty Council that I (we) am (are) aware of he ir. provement plans and that the proposed neighb project or use requires Council approval. k- SAA/y\^t^. -Propcfty - Own er Cc«J56<UWr'o<^ Ucn ^ , u- T H TI If you have any information that may assist the City in the r^iew of j Application, please submit your comments to flie Building & Zonmg Office at least 10 d y p to the scheduled meeting date. vV\r»\<=M.T on» oP 9 request for council action j ^ DATE: FebnfSS^^- ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Ben Meinhardt, 3585 Sixth Avenue North License List of Exhibits A - Home Occupation Renewal License Application B - Location Map C - Oman Letter May 6, 1994 D - Staff Memo M irch 26, 1986 E - Original Home Occupation License Application F - Staff Letter February 2, 1995 Review of Renewal Application Mr. Meinhardt has operated his electrical contracting business from his residence since 1986 review Exhibits D and E. The existing large bam was to serve for storage of his ^cks and equipment. The only employee to come to the site was an electrician wlio worked for Meinhardt’s business that would park his vehicle at the site and pick up the business tmck. Mr. Meinhardt’s business and office were operated from his residence This level of home occupation use by a contractor has been found to be acceptable as long as aP commercial equipment and vehicles are stored within an enclosed structure and not visible to adjacent property owners. Mr. Meiniiardt s wife served as secretary. Since 1986, Mr. Meinhardt's wife’s arthritic condition proceeded to wor^n requiring a part-time nurse who also took over the secretarial responsibilities, i.e. answering the Mrs. Meinhardt was able to take over the clerical responsibilities in the afternoon. In 1994, Mrs Meinhardt’s condition worsened such that she was in the hospital off and on and passed awav a few months ago. The former nurse continues to do secretarial work for Mr. Meinhardt up to about 1:00 p.m. An electrician continues to bring his vehicle to the property and pick up the company truck. Per the original staff review memo of 1986, Exhibit E, it was City s understanding that all employee vehicles would be parked within the large bam. Mr. Meinlwrdt advises that it is ver\' difficult to facilitate the parking exchange within the bam on certain days forcinu the electrician’s vehicle to be parked to the rear of the bam the majority of time. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 February 3, 1995 Ben Meinhardt, 3585 Sixth Avenue North - Home Occupation Renewal License On Februar 1st, staff inspected the property noting certain commercial trailers and building material (steel forms) stored in *he rear yard. Staft took photos for Council s review. Staff also noted that a boat and trailer for yard work was stored to the rear of the bam. The conditions of the orieinal home occupation license would find that the storage of the commercial trailers and materiarwere in violation of that license. Staff met with Mr. Meinhardt to review the storace of the commercial equipment and construction material. Applicant advised that the commercial equipment and materials were his son’s and he would see that his son removed his property so that his license would not be invalidated. Staff reattirmed the City s position in a follow-up letter to applicant. Exhibit F. Staff advised Mr. Meinhardt that we would go ahead and recommend approval of the home occupation license as long as the exterior commercial items owned by his son were removed and that vve would recommend to the Council that we would monitor the property for a period of six months and then bring back the matter before the Council for a status report. Staff ftlt that recommendation would be most applicable with the current situation as Mr. Meinhardt is in a transition period in an attempt to adjust how he plans to proceed with his business, specifically regarding clerical assistance. Meinl.ardt did advise that in approximately two years he would be considering retirement and selling the business. The applicant plans to continue the use of Mrs. Grabill as a part-time secretary during the six-month interim penod. This would be a violation of the home occupation code. Applicant should be advised of the need to pursue other m.:ans of clerical/phone back up in the operation of his business. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend staff recommendation to conditionally approve the home occupation renewal license fc- Ben Meinhardt at the property located at 3585 Sixth Avenue North for a six- month period (August 13, 1995) and to direct staff to submit a status report on the final resolve of the business operation and to further determine if the use involves violations of the code and if variances would be appropriate or acceptable to the City. 1 d CITY OF ORONO ___ _ _ _ _ _ . . P.O. Box 66, 1335 So Brovm Rc Date License Expires:—^ OCCOPATIOS LICESSZ xnpRjiss: r/^ ^ ^ —^ii£sr Anolication Date:_ _ _ _ __ " Date License Approvea:. _ • «—> — * ^Ae • k Ann ial Review v-*w. PHONE : ^3i ^3 Q . of Eaployees within olTback of this applicaticn Provide list of names c- e-:— - -^ —- . "Voe of Business to be Operated:. . - - - rp^xrj^Ton pursuan-t ---------------------------^ -time wij.j. --------------w? i i be is required by City sta^^, ‘Plication with staff recaamiendation will •scheduled before the « nonth. on the second and fourth Monaay »=sassB3Bsss===i=====*-'”** “rrr**__^wrmr.awn'OHS ON B rrrv nr r-rnk/rfa 1 1 v» uMwftw Prohibited Ecme Occupation Prac-ices FlhiAfrCE Ct-rii:: ^ r? ? a w 1 1 w V V W V'^ec iscme uuw%ww&-— j.win-vvwv , .. • e- nc es a hcine occupa^^i,^^ T-- -s unlawful for any busines ^'^-o-ses. Ihir.*!* TL...... -v».vi --n coerauicr. witheun proper Iroa-ses. .iCcrp-./.v-v.-. ,'W , - ^ .. J.riCT #?vi » a -? • 2. 3. i-f-v--TsJ.-V'‘ VMM-T.—ar»P> 'n cseifii—-------------* - *i“ e*-*' *' ,*r5o’‘»'*'he dwei?l-is^. «r,r-p,fT^c *n tie business r.usi resice i.. -be ewe-—^ .All persons enoaoeo — -ne o ____^ *»(3 in tne Ko conuneroial sror.s perriuteo o-.he. -han s.. . residential zone- 1, —;,-e nav b® stored on the premises....;.,.......No-excessive stock in -—awe n ^ !. Over the counter retail sales is no- a-lowed. ;:v;..=™.- - *• •■”■ ■"structure. —=«*-»- unicipal Code and any add ----cnai ci.ii ^ the Orono ,gna‘ pai uoats ---------- 9 /} i ^ -n / .^a of -• _ w—^eg?^£^gss3stsr^s.—— ■ , . • m ^ a ^ 2T 6 C OXil USE ONI«^- A-W-- •%.)H t.—- Approval cf License)llowing: ______ zor^no r - - •care: cmature of Zon-ng u.---------—__—— ^ ff}K \ riw,*-o* CSwiOilf Denial cf License oxmnencs t:he V-3-l^ cnauure cf Fire Inspector: Date: ^ ^ MAY 13 1994 I CITY; ^ yi^yt/tCCe^^L^ DATS OF BIFTE; date of BIRTH; NAME; addrsss<. ■ . > -^ - ^—7—Zy/ „^.. _±i‘ y y DATE OF BIRTH;_ CITY: date of BIRTH; 44«^jr • NAME; ADDRESS; CITY; DATS OF BIRTH: " T’O •iLii- • NAME; ADDRESS: ^•TfnV • W— - • • ]3ATE of birth ; II?; • • • • • address; CITY;_ _ date of birth; ZIP; ADDRESS; DATE OF BIRTH; ZIP; CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 May 6, 1994 Mr. Ben Mcinhnrdt 3585 Sixth Avenue North Long Lake, Minnesota 53356 Re: Home Occupation License Dear Ben: 0.1 Ara il 21 I'ISO ihc Cily of Orono issued a home occupation license for you to operate your as noss'ble. II you have any questions, on this matter, feel free to contact me at my o tas possible. II you Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch Enc. Home Occupation License Application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Adm Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 » 'Mi S •. ■; A»4a »■ »4-r#,4 *> 7«' 6;- ^•.‘V; ' TO: FKOM: DATE: SOBJi Mayor Cutler Mark Bernhardscn Orono Counei1 Mcnbcrc Jeanne A. Kabusth March 26, 19B6 Reinhardt plans to purchase the acre residentl*i located on the south side of Countv nna/c r>siaential property the Otten Nursery property (See Exhibit n c^st ofis at Sixth Avenue North. Exhibit B, Access to property Melnhardfs current busiress is located in one of structures to be razed as part of th» commercial improvement project. He pla^s to sell Long Lake purchase the new site for his Drincinai current home and requires a license from the City fo sMow^k"'®* -PPHcant business from his home. The ex^istina noi^K 0P«-te his residence will serve as garage for his^tfeik parts. Nothing will be stored outsid- warehouse for His wife acts as his secretary The oA i Planned, from his own home and keeps Vhe vehio^'^ employee works Pox'i me. It would appear ti»t M^inhaVd^*® ® residence in utUfl., .11 .t.nd.rcl. ot Section 10.20 sitdKuior.*? ?hVV.« ‘>..1. by tb, city for man. He plans to operlte^his b^I^lni^s^ busine • of c-ir other local contractor^ Tho V® •» -anyserve Mcinhardt's use. * aito is well equipped to the applicant has*moved^to the*sito. ^"**’**^^ storage area once Occupation Llcense^lppiication*^of"*approval of the H. e standard, of the A’ if* :4'- - ^■*1 tA V, •a V' te-' • . ■•“uirv-'A’vv v\ i ,1* J *. • ."J V' J • &A--?'. r m m-’ License No. 0 ue ^ Date P.c'*civc< -dpT^l#^ ® Date Expires •>» CITY OP ORONO 133S DROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 5S323 Namei _ AddressT ly J ^ 9 tj:J‘Phone .*7^ / Number of Employees within operation *? Provide list of Names of Employees on back of this application. • OescriDtion of Request, ^ i^.Xnjue^fU^ ' ■ MUNICIpL°CODE ** “iP^A A°ND^iS^KC A RECOMmSdATION PURSUANT^^^^^ INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BY CITY STAFF, THE REVIEW TIME - WILL BE EXTENDED TO TEN (10) **'>SINESS DAYS. CVIEW TIME ••' ’ ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS OV HOME OCCUPATIONS \ PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.20 SUBD 4(C) •“• Prohibited Boae Occupation Practices. !-• ' 4«« unlawful tor any business operating as a home occupation to enaaoe-X- In operation without proper licenses. v*w»tw engage persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwellina* t' ’ ^{■^•raaidantial zo*n2r*^*^^*^ «i9ns permitted other than signs pernitted in a excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premiseso ®* Over the counter retail aalea is not allowed. rrjV^’II—5 2-f f 2f t^*L^*** occupation muet be gained from within the structure. t*. • hereby egrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono .Municipel Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. . After review of application, staff recommends the followingt ' - - -Approval of application _ _ _ _ Denial of application Signature of Eonlng Official - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --Slgnatura of Fire Inspectors Dates A'‘"- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -_ • - (OVER) n.yc Dates s- *.vt r- ■9 •<1* . u. :«ane: NAMKS OK KMPLOYEKS (Employees must reside in the dwelling) • lYO AddresTT "" ^ * -^L^ 2>-* ^ ~ ^ ~ Address ^ -v»i t ?hone: License No.2l2L-Phone: _ _ License No. L’ar.c: _ AdcressT ^ Phone: _~ License No. Name: AddressT Phone: _ _ License No. Name: ^ AddressT ^a/'ULy y r, Phone: ^ Licensc/No. Name: _ Address: Phone: _ _ License No, Additional names, please attach list) ^ • * • > - - ' :* ^. ( .• 0 f f ■A •«' •« -■•1 - , A ■h;[{^a-i.' • v-w-fr-’' ■ .'; ■ • r--- ■ K»?>3>:vJ.» ; a ■ “ • \-;r i a-. • < •. y.. A V ‘..r LV*'i - -vV * .•»,' • e^*"*»* -• CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 C366 February 2, 1995 Ben Meinhart 3585 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: Home Occupation License Dear Mr. Meinhart: "t" bring" your "p^perty iltl compliance with City Ordinances. 1 Exterior storage of business trailers not part of your operLion but for an off site operation o Exterior storage of building materials (steel). V us^of truclt loiy for storage i7°l''ing an off site commercial operation to the rear of the b staff will forward your Home °6 montS“”"if yoS^’hlve^^r^y qu^es^t^^^^^ feel free to contact me at my office. sincerely, — Lyle Oman, Building Official LO/jb cc- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 i, •, ' ' • ' 3 , i.9,Q5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Februai^ 10, 1995 ITEM NO: ' Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse Administrator’s Report Title City Administrator Item Description: 7^ Options for Resolving the Kelly Avenue Drainage Problem At the January 23 Council meeting, staff provided information regarding the Kelly Avenue drainage problem and optional solutions. Council directed staff to analyze the options more closely; including fine tuning cost estimates and identifying funding sources, including options for assessing costs to benefitted properties. The results of staffs efforts are attached for Council review and discussion. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: There is no Council action requested at this time. TO;Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:February 9, 1995 SUBJECT:Kelly Avenue - Road Construction During discussions of the Kelly of storm sewer proposals, it was suggested to raise the road in the low area as part of the overall project. It was determined that we need to prepare a cost for raising the road in the low area in one foot increments not to exceed 3 feet. The following are these costs: Raise the road one foot Raise the road two feet Raise the road three feet $28,880 $40,040 $52,050 If we proceed with the project, I would suggest we perform raising the road with City forces and materials already on hand. An estimate of costs if City forces do the work is attached. Raise 1’ 300 cu. yds. common borrow 700 sq. yds mill bituminous surface @ 2.00 600 tons cl 5 aggregate @ 8.02 50 ft. 18" CMP @ 10.50 150 tons bituminous surface @ 26.00 900 sq. yd stabilization fabric @ 2.00 600 lin. ft. of silt fence @ 4.00 black dirt seeding sod, etc. lump sum n/c $ 1,400 4,812 525 3,900 1,800 2,400 1.500 $16,337 Raise 2* 700 cu. yd. borrow 800 sq. yds. mill bimminous surface @2.00 800 tons cl 5 aggregate @8.02 200 tons bituminous surface @ 26.00 1,200 sq. yds. stabilization fabric @ 2.00 800 lin. ft. silt fence @ 4.00 50 lin. ft. 18" CMM @ 10.50 black dirt seeding sod, etc. lump sum n/c $ 1,600 6,416 5.200 2,400 3.200 525 1.700 $21,041 Raise 3" 1,200 cu. yds. common borrow 1,100 sq. yds. mill bimminous surface @ 2.00 1,000 tons cl 5 aggregate @ 8.02 250 tons bimminous surface @ 20.00 1,500 sq. yds. stabilization fabric @ 1.00 1,000 lin. ft. silt fence @ 4.00 50 lin. ft. 18" CMP @ 10.50 black dirt seeding sod, etc. lump sum n/c $ 2,200 8,020 6.500 1.500 4.000 525 2.000 $24,745 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& IvJl Associates Engineers & Architects February 8, 1995 Boneitroa Itosenr Anaefht ^<3 Anoastet me »i jm Afffrrruttfve Acvon/£qu*i Ooportumry Ono G Boneiffoo Pooert Jf ffoiene * JOiepr^ C Ande»ii<i Mafvin L iorvalj ffKn^rd E Turner ^E Gter>n 9 Coo« ^E T^o^r^^ £ Nove\ PE RoOert G Scnunu»'t RE Suten M Eberun C R* • Senior Con»u«t4nl HcMard A Sanford RE Keitn A Gordon PE RoDerf R Pfetferle PE Ric*^ard W Foirer PE Daw'd O loi«ota Rf Rooert C Rui»e« A i a Jerry A Bourdon PE Mart A Manton PE V fnae' T Raufmann PE Ted K Field '’E fhomat R Anderson A i a Donald C Burqardt PE Tr>om.n A Sytto PE Freder-C i itenoorg. PE itmaei Martme/ **E Micriaei P R au PE :nom.M W Pererton PE Mtfhaei C Lynch PE James R Maiand P£ Jerry O Pertrsch P£ Frederic J Stenborq P£ Scott J Arganet PE tenneth P Anderson PE Mart R Rolfs Rf Mark A Seip PE Gary Mf Monen PE Paul J Gannon, A I A Daniel J Edqerton Pf A Rick Schmidt PE Philip J Caiweii PE Mart O Waiiit PE Miles B Jensen PE L Ph'Hip Gravel PE Karen l JUiemen PE Gary O Rnupritl. Pf Brian K Gage. PE Keith R vapp PE Douglas J Benoit PE Shawn D Gustafson PE Cecil*© Oliver PE Paul G Neuer. P£ John P Gorder PE Dan D Boyum P£ Jeffrey J Ehirnnqer PE lee M Mann PE Charles A Erickson Leo M Paweisky Harlan M O'son Agnes M Ring James F Engeihardi 55323 Mr. John Gerhardson, Public Works Director City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota Re: Kelly Avenue File No. 13976 IjCill jOillly We have enclosed a draft assessment roll for the proposed storm drainage improvements on Kelly Avenue north of Carman Road. The recommended option provides for cori:>truciioii of a lift station and forcemain system from Kelly pond to Carman Cove. The assessments do not include costs for raising the elevation of Kelly Avenue or replacing the sanitary sewer in the area. The assessments have been divided on an area basis over the entire property that has direct runoff to the drainage area. Please note that no adjustments have been made to the assessments in regards to land use or zoning (residential or commercial). At the Council meeting, we will have available for comparison a separate assessment roll that divides the assessment based on the type of land use. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK, AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. Enclosure 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 551 13 ■ 612-636-4600 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTTHCATION ROLLProject No. 13976 Resolution No. Interest Rate Project Name KELLY AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE Resolution Date Municipal Code No. Prepared By SDG Date reoniary 7, 1995 Levy No. Sheet 1 of S Assessment Rate m COPY Area Trunk Total Owner/ P.I.N.Addition Acre $/Acre Assessment Tax Payer Address 20 117 23 11 0030 Lot 3, Block 1, Leach Addition 2.23 $1,600 $3,568.00 Deanna M. Leach Clair Rood 2215 Kenwood Bay WayzaU,MN 55391 20 117 23 11 0007 Tract C, Reg. Land Surv. No. 0088 2.31 1,600 $3,696.00 Kirk K. NeUon 2560 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 20117 23 11 0032 ’Lot 2, Block I, Orono Hills 4.73 1,600 $7,568.00 1st Nat'l Bank of Navarre P.O. Box 123 Navarre, MN 55392 20 117 23 11 0024 Tract D, Reg. Land Surv. No. 1422 2.94 1,600 $4,704.00 MGT. Company Super Valu Stores Inc. Corporate Tm* Dept. P.O. Box 990 Mirmeqjolis, MN 55440 20117 23 11 0015 Pt. of Lots 1&2, Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park 0.51 1,600 $816.00 1st Nat'l Bank of Navarre Co.Rd. 15 & Co.Rd. 19 Navarre. MN 55392 20 117 23 11 0017 Pt. of Lot 2, Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park 0.37 1,600 $592.00 Jaribo Inc.P.O. Box 95 Navarre, MN 55392 20 117 23 11 0018 Pt. of Lots 2Si3, Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park 0.65 1,600 $1,040.00 Paul M & Jeanne M Enghind P.O. Box 95 Navarre, MN 55392 20117 23 11 0031 Lot I, Block 1, Orono Hills 0.6 1,600 $960.00 1st Nat'l Bank of Navarre P.O. Box 123 Navarre. MN 55392 20 11723 110027 Tracts A & B, Reg. Land Surv. No. 0088 0.06 1,600 $96.00 Duane N Hall 17805 Crestline Hunble, TX 77396 2011723 11 0028 Lot 1, Block I, Leach Addition 0.37 1,600 $592.00 Deaima M Leach Clair Rood 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzata, MN 55391 20 117 23 11 0029 Lot 2, Block L Leach Addition 0.48 1,600 $768.00 Deanna M Leach Clair Rood 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzau, MN 55391 l:\13976\Aimnt2.wp5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIHCATION ROLLProject No. 13976 Resolution No. Interest Rate Project Name KELLY AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE Resolution Date Municipal Code No. Prepared By SDG Date F^ruaiy 7, 1995 Levy No. Sheet 2 of S Assessment Rate Area Trunk Total Owner/ P.I.N.Addition Acre $/Acre Assessment Tax Payer Address 20 11723 11 0021 Pt. of Lot 6, Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park 0.76 1.600 $1,216.00 Valeria M Elliott, Trustee 2565 Lydiard Avenue Navarre, MN 55392 20117 23 11 0003 Lot 1, Block 1, Apple HUl 0.41 1,600 $656.00 GloidonJ Olsmi 2585 Lydiard Avenue Excelsior. MN 55331 20 117 23 11 0004 Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Hill 0.45 1,600 $720.00 Philip & Elizabeth Lenox Rt. 1 Maple Plaine, MN 55359 20 117 23 14 0001 Lot 3. Block L Apple Hill 0.47 1,600 $752.00 G L Maltzen St BJLervik 2605 Lydiard Circle Orono, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0002 Lot 4, Block 1, Apple Hill 0.41 1,600 $656.00 Michael L St Karen GUbeitson 2615 Lydiard Circle S. Excelsior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0003 Lot 5, Block 1, Apple HiU 0.45 1,600 $720.00 C M Williams & C L Alvarez 2625 Lydiaid Circle Excelsior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0005 Lot 7, Block 1 Apple Hill 0.04 1,600 $64.00 Julian Hook, et al 2650 Kelly Avenue Excekior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0006 Lot 8, Block 1, Apple HUl 0.49 1,600 $784.00 John R Si Sheny L Volkmar 2640 Kelly Avenue Excekior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0018 Pt. of Lot 6, Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park 0.86 1,600 $1,376.00 Ginger L Pritchard Ginger L Scott 2620 KeUy Avenue Excekior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0009 Lot 3, Block 1, Caiman Cove 0.01 1,600 $16.00 John T & H Farnham 3225 Caiman Road Excekior, MN 55331 20 117 23 14 0010 Lot 4, Block 1, Caiman Cove 0.01 1,600 $16.00 Jane B. Nebon 3245 Caiman Road Excekr'nr, MN 55331 l:\i3976VRimm2.wp5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLProject No. 13976 Renlution No. Interest Rate Project Name KELLY AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE Resolution Date Municipal Code No. Prepared By SDO Date Fd>ruaiy 7, 1995 Levy No. Sheet 3 of S P.I.N. 20 117 23 14 0011 20 117 23 14 0016 20 117 23 14 0017 20 117 23 14 0025 2'^ U7 23 14 0026 20 ll*»23 14 0022 20 117.\» 14 0021 20 117 23 ;4 0020 20 117 23 14 4019 20 117 23 11 0023 20 117 23 11 0022 Addition Lot 5, Block 1, Caiman Cove Park, Carman Cove Lot 1, Block 2, Carman Cove Lot 8, Si Pt. of Lots 7 & 9, Block 5. Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 6 & Pt. of Lot 7, Block 5. Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 5, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Pt. of Lot 4, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Pt. of Lot 4, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 3, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 2, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 1, Block 5, Townsite of Langdon Park Assessment Rate Area Trunk Total Owner/ Acre $/Acre Assessment Tax Payer Addresi 0.02 1,600 $32.00 Benjamin D Milbrath 3265 Camyui Road Excelfior, MN 55331 0.11 1,600 $176.00 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55359 0.75 1,600 $1,200.00 Marilyn H McClaskey 2693 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 2.53 1,600 $4,048.00 1.7 1,600 $2,720.00 Kurt St Christa Nejezchleba 2625 Kelly Avenue Excekior,MN 55331 0.88 1,600 $1,408.00 William J Stoddard 2605 Kelly Aveiaie Excelsior. MN SS331 0.04 1,600 $64.00 Leonora R Mitchell 2587 Kelly Avenue 0.37 $592.00 Mrs. D F Mitchell Excelsior, MN 55331 1,600 AledaC Burch 2585 Kelly Avenue Excebior, MN 55331 0.7 1,600 $1,120.00 Everett 1 Schroeder 2565 Kelly Avenue Excelsior. MN 55331 0.75 1,600 $1,200.00 Robert H St Barbara A Ponzetti 2545 Kelly Avenue Excebior, MN 55331 2.37 1,600 $3,792.00 Charles E & M C Troyak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excebior. MN 55331 I:\13976\ajnuu3.wp5 Project No. 13976 Resohition No. Interest Rate SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLProject Name KELLY AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE Resolution Date Municipal Code No. Prepared By SDG Date February 7,1995 Levy No. Sheet 4 of 5 P.I.N. 20 117 23 12 0039 20 117 23 12 0038 20 117 23 12 0037 20 117 23 12 0039 20 117 23 12 0038 20 117 23 12 0037 20 117 23 12 0046 20 117 23 12 0051 20 117 23 12 0052 20 117 23 12 0053 20 117 23 12 0054 Addition The Marsh at Lafayette Lot 8, Block 1, The Marsh at Lafayette Tract D, Reg. Land Surv. No. 1428 Tract C, Reg. Land Surv. No. 1428 Tract B, Reg. Land Surv. No. 1428 Lot 3, Block 1, Navarre Cove Lot 1, Block I, Kelly Cove Lot 2, Block 1, Kelly Cove Lot 3, Block 1, Kelly Cove Lot 4, Block L Kelly Cove Area Acre 0.23 0.11 0.08 0.23 0.11 0.08 0.25 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 Assessmoit Rate Trunk $/Acre Total Assessment Owner/ Tax I^yer Address 1,600 $368.00 Freshwater Foundation 725 Co. Rd. 6 Wayzata^MN 55391 1,600 $176.00 Freshwater Foundation 725 Co. Rd. 6 Wayzata, MN SS391 1,600 $128.00 1,600 $368.00 Keith A Sl Janet L Benton 2523 Kelly Avenue Excebior.MN 55331 1,600 $176.00 John E Sl Jean C Folin 2515 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 1,600 $128.00 Charts Sl Candice Nadler 2509 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 1,600 $400.00 Peter Chow Mary Managment P.O. 235 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1,600 $64.00 Austin H Sl Diane Evans 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 1,600 $64.00 R V Dahl Sl MS Dahl Sylvia A Bertagnoli 2499 Kelly Avenue Excebk>r,MN 55331 1,600 $80.00 Daniel T Lindsay 100 5th Street S., Suite 2500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 1,600 $48.00 Daniel T Lindsay 100 5th Street S., Suite 2500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 I; M 3976\Amit2. wp5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTTHCATION ROLLProject No._ 13976RetohiUoo No.. Interest Rete__ Project Name KFI l.Y AVFNUF. STORM HP AlNAnF _ Resolution Date____________Municipal Code No.___ —-----------------------------------Prepared By ______SfXi n>tg FAfiiry 7, I QOS -------Levj No______ Sheet_i Assessment Rate P.I.N.Addition Area Acre Trunk $/Acre Total Assessment Owner/ Tax Payer Address 1 20 117 23 12 00SS Outlet A, Kelly Cove 0.55 1.600 $880.00 Kelly Cove Homeowners Assn/Orono 100 South 5th St., Suite I 2500 1 Minneapolis, MN 55402 1 20 117 23 12 0034 Tract B, Reg. Land Surv. No. 1422 0.61 1.600 $976.00 Richard M Keaveny et al P.O. Box 59 1 Navarre, MN 55392 | N.A.Roadway Rjght-of-Way 4.72 1,600 $7,552.00 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55369 $36.%$59,136.00 1: M 3976\Atmat2 . wp5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A DATE: Februa t 5/S ITEM NO.j Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing For the past several years, the City of Orono has been receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through Hennepin County Development and Planning. This year the City will receive S23.918. A requirement for receiving the funds is for the City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive citizen input regarding the appropriate use of the funds. The public hearing notice must list possible eligible projects; therefore I have listed projects that have been approved for funding in the past. If after the public hearing, the City Council chooses to allocate the monies elsewhere, they can do so. It is recommended to conduct the public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on February 27, 1995. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to schedule a public hearing to receive public comment regarding the City's C.D.B.G grant allocation for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, February 27, 1995. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1995 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY development BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that Ote city " to Title 1 of the Housing U„ Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley public hearing on February 27, 1995, at /.uu p.m. Parkway. The public hearing is on the housing and Urb^Tennepin Tbe cirv of Orono is proposing to undertake *= foHowmg activiues wiO, 1995 Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting on or about July 1, Activity WeCan Operations Westonka Intervention lOCP Transportation Sewer Connection Grant Housing Rehabilitation Grant Budget $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $3,000 $16,418 ■ rn-r- ■“ "Urban^Hennepin County policy wUl be subject to the amendment proce . perfo^cf oforToT473^-7?5T^^^ S^Spin County Offfee of Planning and Development at 541-7080. The public hearing is being held pursuant to MS 471.59. Is/ Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Februarj ’ 9; :n •« ITEM NO: %Vo Department Approval: ^ Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Cit}' Administrator’s Report Item Description: 1995 Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation and Award Recommendation Attachment: Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation Attached is a comparative tabulation of tlie 1994 actual and 1995 insurance premiums, and the 1995 budget amounts. At this time we are recommending award and payment of the policies for all except the golf course liquor liability, which renews April 1; the worker compensation, which was approved and awarded at the December 12, 1994 Council meeting; and the garage keepers liability which renews January 1, but was omitted from our policy package by the LMCIT and will be forwarded shortly. The City will continue to carry an umbrella excess liability policy of $2 million in 1995, and as in 1994 will not waive the statutory limits established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The estimated cost for all policies and the agent of record for 1995 is $142,108 compared to $144,165 for 1994, and $163,433 for 1993. It is recommended that the 1995 insurance coverage be awarded as presented in the attachment, except for the policies previously awarded, or renewing at a later date. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Award of the 1995 insurance package effective January 1, 1995 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,____, seconded by,_____, to award the insurance effective January 1, 1995 as follow s: to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for the comprehensive municipal property and casualty package $65,505, for umbrella excess liability $21,549, for petrofund reimbursement $821, and for open meeting law $789; to Western National Insurance Group for boiler and machinery $331; to the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co for small computers $500; and to the United Fire and Casualtv for suretv bonds. $1,700. Ayes___, Nays___. 1 CITY OF ORONO INSURANCE POLICY PREMIUM TABULATION INSURANCE POLICY AWARDED TO ACTUAL PREMIUMS 1994 RENEWAL PREMIUMS 1995 PREMIUM BUDGET 1995 Worker Compensation LMCIT $37,354 fA1 $41,444 $50,369 Comprehensive Municipal Property and Casualty; Property Vehicle Liab/Coll/U M/Equip Inland Marine Garage Keepers Crime General Liability LMCIT $8,038 8,805 1,677 198 60 54,476 $8,607 7,877 1,418 (E) 225 54 47^324 Total Comprehensive Municipal Property & Casualty $73,254 $65,505 $79,613 Petrofund Reimbursement LMCIT 689 821 850 Open Meeting Law LMCIT 830 789 790 Public Employees Bond U F&C 1,398 1,497 1,528 Monies & Securities UF&C 107 203 111 Boiler Western Nat ’l 296 331 367 Computers St. Paul Co 500 500 500 Umbrella Excess Liability LMCIT 20,574 (B) 21,549 31.222 Liquor Liability for Golf Course 1,513 (C) 1.589 1.589 Agent of Record Apple Valley 7,650 7,880 (D) 2.551 TOTAL ALL INSURANCE POLICIES $144,165 $142,108 $169,490 (A) Renewal Approved at 12/12/94 Council meeting (B) Umbrella $2 million, without waiver of immunity (C) Renewal date April 1st, estimated premium (D) Net fee after commissions (E) Renewal date Jan 1st. estimated premium % A % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION S DATE: February 9,1995 ITEM NO: // / % Department Approval: j/ ,Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Tom Kuehn • Title Finance Director * Citv Administrator's Report Item Description: 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund Close Out -Resolution Attachment! Resolution To Close the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund In 1993 the Council authorized that the 1980 Improvement Bonds be called and that the proceeds be used to assist in the funding of the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989. In December of 1993 transfers in the amount of $241,000 were made from the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Fund to the Water and Sewer Operating Funds. The close out of the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Fund will result in the transfer of the remaining assets. The 1980 Improvement Bond Fund debt was called as of March 1, 1994, and all outstanding bonds were redeemed. At the end of 1994 there is remaining approximately $106,150 of assets, including cash and investment interest receivables of $71,480, and outstanding special assessments receivables of $34,670. As the remaining assets are no longer required for the debt service of the 1980 Improvement Bond Fund it is requested that the assets be closed to the Water Operating Fund to assist in the funding of the G. O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989. COUNCIL .ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of Resolution #_____, A Resolution to Close the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund to the Water Operating Fund. PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,____. seconded by,_____, to adopt Resolution #_____. A Resolution to Close the 1980 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund to the Water Operating Fund as of December 31, 1994. Ayes ____, Nays ____. A RESOLUTION TO CLOSE THE 1980 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS DEBT SERVICE FUND TO THE WATER OPERATING FUND WHEREAS, the 1980 G.O. Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund was established to account for the payment of the said bonds principal, interest and fiscal agent fees; and WHEREAS, all outstanding bonds were called on March 1, 1994, the final payment of bond principal, interest and fiscal agent fees having been then made, and the remaining residual equity of the Fund is no longer required, and WHEREAS, the City can designate the use of the residual equity for any general purpose NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1980 G.O. Improvement bonds Debt Service Fund be closed and that the residual equity at December 31, 1994 be transferred to the Water Operating Fund to be used as a funding source of the G.O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1989. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor request for council action ^ DATE; Febniaiy • o /' "^S ITEM NO.:T. '</7 Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Seasonal Weight Restrictions Atmcted is a list of the reconunended axle wei^ght 1™* streets will be posted from March 15 through May 15, 1995. . Ko,.* niinu/pfi cnlid waste haulers to continue their normalISEEr= :sr = vehicles. An axle limit exemption for public service vehicles to be used during emergency situations has also been included in this resolution. I have drafted a resolution for the 1995 weight limiLs for CouncU approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: .■ss.rsi^'Si.Virs s»-ifC s=“,?rs"sr.::i55r Ayes__, nays 1 TO:John R. Gerhardson. Public Works Coordinator FROM: Jack Brinkhaus, Supervisor II DATE:January 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Seasonal Weight Restrictions "wiil be pL«d ‘^from tougTSay'™" 1995.5ircci:> will uv - — I- cniid waste haulers to continue their normal In the past several anv single a.xle of seven tons or 14,000 pounds. raTeet' we wilflimit tne solid waste haulers to smaller vehicles. An axle limit exemption for public service vehicles to be used during emergency simations has also been included in this resolution. I have drafted a resolution for the 1995 weight limits for Council approval. The City of Otono ordain, that ^ ^^0“ ScC=t - thfjrw::^"re cxcLTI^to T' !l^d“icks shall be operated upon any City street a. anv tune where special posting specifically prohibits retuse collection vehicles. An axle linut exemption to u s' ^.TasTea'i:^ emergency commu-nication, line down or severed, etc. The following streets are Arbor Street Baldur Park Road Barrett Avenue Bayview Place Bederwocd Drive Birch Lane Blaine Avenue Bohn ’s Point Lane Bohn ’s Point Road Brackett’s Point Road Briar Street Brown Road, North Carman Road Carman Street Caroline Avenue Casco Avenue Casco Circle Casco Point Road Cherry Avenue Cherry Place Chevy Chase Drive limited to five ton axle limits; Chippewa Lane Concordia Street Corral Road Country Club Road Crestview Avenue Crystal Avenue Crystal Bay Road Crystal Place Cygnet Place Dahl Road Dickenson Street Dickenson Street Alleys Dickey Lake Drive Dunwoody Avenue Eastlake Street East Long Lake Road Eileen Street Elm Lane Elm Street Elmwood Avenue Ethel Avenue Eagerness Point Road Fairview Cottage Farview Lane Femdale Green Femdale Road West Forest Arms Lane Forest Lake Drive Forest Lake Landing Fox Ridge Road Fox Street (S. Brown to Orono Orchard ) Fox Street (S. Brown to Willow Drive) Fox Street (#84 to Willow Drive) Frederick Street Glendale Avenue Grandview Avenue Hackberry Hill Hanlon Avenue Heritage Drive Page 1 of 3 Heritage Lane High Lane Highwood Road Hunter Drive Iw Place Keene Avenue Kelly Avenue Kenwood Way Lakeview Avenue Lafayette Ridge Court Lakeview Terrace Leaf Street Lilac Lane Linden Avenue Linden Lane Livingston Avenue Loma’ Linda Avenue Long Lake Boulevard Lydiard Avenue Lydiard Circle Lyman Avenue Lyric Avenue Maple Lane Maple Place Mapleridge Lane Minnetonka Avenue Minnetonka Highlands Minnie Avenue Mynlewood Road Navarre Avenue Navarre Lane North Arm Drive North Arm Lane North Fcmdale Road Northern Avenue Oak Street Old Beach Road Old Long Lake Road Olive Avenue Orchard Beach Place Orchard Park Road Orono Lane Orono Orchard Road Orono Townline Road Park Avenue Park Drive Park Lane Partenwood Road Pheasant Lawn Road Prospect Avenue Railroad Avenue Rest Point Circle Rest Point Lane Russell Avenue Scotch Pine Lane Shevlin Drive Smith Avenue Spates Avenue Spring Hill Road Spruce Place Starkey Road Stubbs Bay Road Tamarack Drive Togo Road Tonka Avenue Tumham Road Union Cemetery Road Vine Place Watertown Road Wear Lane North Wear Circle Webb Street Webber Hills Road West Femdale Road West Lafayene Road West Lake Street Wildhurst Trail Willow Drive (Dickey Lake Dr. to Sixth Avenue) Willow Drive (Sixth Avenue to Medina City limits) Willow Drive (from South Brown Road to Fox Street) Willowbrook Road Windjammer Lane Woodhill Avenue Page 2 of 3 The following are nine-ton axle limit: Kelley Parkway Old Crystal Bay Road McCuliey Road Tonkaview Lane t i a Willow Drive (from Watenown Road to Long Lake)sr ss:: s Eir,?."rSn The following bridge is limited to 18-ton per vehicle. 29 Tons per truck and full trailer or semi-trailer combination. Willow Drive The following bridge is limited to 19-ton per vehicle. 32 Tons per truck and full trailer or semi-trailer combination: West Femdale Road Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 13, 1995. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 3 of 3 L REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 9, ITEM NO.: 3 j. % Department Approval: Name Lyle Oman Title Building Official Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Building Code Board of Appeals Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Chief, declined to remain on the Building Code Board of Appeals for 1995. I am proposing to replace him with Kenneth Roelofs, an Orono building contractor. Mr. Roelofs has worked in and around the community for many years and has gained the respect of the Building and Zoning Department. I feel Mr. Roelofs’ experience would be a great asset to the Board. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt the enclosed resolution appointing Kenneth Roelofs to the Orono Buildng Code Board of Appeals. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3515 DESIGNATING THE APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1995 TO THE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS It shall be amended as follows: Kenneth Roelofs, Building Contractor, sjuII replace Theodore Paulfranz. Edina Fire Chief, on the Orono Building Code Board of Appeals to be effective as of February 13, 1995 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 13, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of February, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public r 't's Of ^5^*>» REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Febniarf 'KJ; 1995 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ren Moorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed:m__Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report / Item Description: Volunteer Commission Reappointments Three members of the Park Commission and two members of the Planmng Commission recently had their terms expire or are currently serving terms that will expire on March 31, 1995. The terms of Lili McMillan, James White and Alexander Vongries on the Park Commission expired as of 12/31/94. As you are aware Mr. Vongries has chosen not to serve an additional term. Lili McMillan and James White have each indicated an interest in continuing to serve on the commission. The terms of Charles Nolan. Jr. and Sandra Smith on the Planning Commission will expire as of March 31, 1995. Each have indicated an interest in continuing to serve on the Planning Commission. Charles Nolan, Jr. has notified the city that he will be moving out of Ihe city in early summer, but is interested in continuing to serve on the commission until that time. The next step in the reappointment process is for the Council to determine the eligibility of those commission members listed above to serve an additional term. The Council may wish lO wait until the whole Council is present to make this determination. Due to the resignation of Alexander Vongries and the upcoming resignation of Charles NoIm, Jr.. staff reconunends advertising for both the Park Commission vacancy and the future Planning Commission vacancy. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize staff to advertise for the vacancies on the Park Commission and Planning Commission. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ' 'y,:t ■ DATE: Febniafy'l^y^S ITEM NO.: / 5' ^ Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed: % Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge Project The bridge on Old Cr>stal Bay Road was replaced using several funding sources. The breakdown of the funding is as follows; Local-City General Fund Federal Funds Minnesota Transportation Fund Municipal State Aid (MSA) $ 7,761.51 349,532.60 87,404.89 82,186.80 A requirement for receiving monies from the Minnesota Transportation Fund is to adopt a resolution stating that any costs in e.xcess of that amount will be funded from other sources and that if there are funds not spent that those monies will be returned. A resolution is attached for Council review and action. I recommend the City Council adopt Resolution 0______. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Resolution # CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION NO. 1995 - A RESOLUTION RELATING TO GRANTS FOR THE OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BRIDGE w IFRF AS the Citv of Orono has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a g,a„. f,r.he^~ Fu?d" for .h. cons.roc.ion of Bridge No. 27680 over d.e Burlington Northern Railroad and: WHEREAS, .he amoun. of .he gran, has been de.ermined .o be $87,404.89 by reason of .he lowest responsible bid. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the City of Orono does hereby affirm that any cost of ihc bridge in excess of the grant will be appropriated from the funds available City of Orono. and that Inw grant monies appropriated for the bridge but not required, based on the fin estimate, shall be returned to the Minnesota State Transportation Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that whereas Federal monies arc being used to participate in the cost of the bridge, grant monies as matching funds shall be transferred directly to t c agency account and that the records of the City of Orono shall so state. rFRTTFICATlQN State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Orono I hc.eby ccriily .ha. .he foregoing Resolu.ion is a .rue and co.re« presemtd .0 an'd ado^.ed by .he Ci.y Council of Orono a. a duly •“*onze^mee.mgJh in the City of Orono, Minnesota, on the___day of---------------------^ as aiscios y records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) Ronald iMoorse, City Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A N./; DATE: Febrtiaiy * ITEM NO: \(/> Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Dorothy Hall in Licenses Title City Clerk Item Description: License for Council Approval Cigarette Licenses Jimmie Holtz Jimmies Lounge Richard Keaveny Keaveny Drug LeRoy Koehnen Navarre Amoco Don Scherven Navarre Lanes Steve Corl Navarre Liquor Bill Wear Orono Self Service John O’Sullivan O’Sullivans Richard Bloomquisl Rick ’s Super Valu John Downey Wayzata Country Club On Sale Non-Intoxicating Liquor License Lakeview Golf Course Grant Wenkstem 405 North Arm Drive Licenses for Council Approval continued page 2 of 2 February 10, 1995 Special Events Permit Runners Edge Athletics 4 mile foot race April 1, 1995 Fred Kurz Memorial Race foot race on Luce Line April 15. 1995 Norwest Bank Minnesota 1/2 marathon foot race Mav 7, 1995 Septic Svstem Installers License A-1 Rootmaster, Inc 7502 Hudson Blvd Lake Elmo 55042 Home Occupation License Initial Review LeRoy A. Pilgram D.C. 1795 Shady wood Road COUNCn. ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve licenses. CIT Post Office Bo* 66 • CrysUl B«M I 'll n * !vi A Offii 473-7358 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SBLL^^G^TTES AT RETAIL Ocono Municipal Code 1. Nanie of Applicant _ y/^Zs=.— 19 Mailing Address 3 3> '3Arr /erf City/State/Zip Code fV\£>u/J Dj ^ Ca^. ^ 4^-». ^ J y Phone Number ^^ ^ ^ •' • ' V' r-L* f <-» ’‘.hI u A • • c . t- M C*! L.U 2 Sales Location: Name ___ Street Address . tion ; /y^iy'0 6-S'. \IA /2- ^ /77/t/ - ^S3SL Phone Number ~ ^ ^---------—--------------------- 3. Principal business carried on at this location ^ Other Ordinan****^ r—^nd ’Ceftea-r4. Method of Sales: Over Counter __(Vending maohine—calea-F''^’" V—Effoptivo date-■5/1/9 0 t^ I hereby nake »PPl ot the^tLU'Vf ^^iSneMVa’and Ibl :"d^7an«rof°th/c‘lly"of 0rono'during the following qoarta.ly pariods: LICENSE FEESF:'fc* .’^ar-Apr M-i rune-July yA Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as m tne case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. CITY of Poal Office Box 66»CryetxI Bay, Minneaota FAX-47M510 Tj llAlIJ APPLICATION rOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGA^TTIg^JT,!^^^^ Orono Municipal Cod^ Section 5^ 1. Name of Applicant A -i/l ------------------------------- Mailing Address A^, Y.'lJ ..O U’ \0 ? ?A City/State/Zip Cod'? Ji\ Phone Number 2. Sales Location; *vrv ,T r -D'v'iT u A I ! u r Name Street Address Mailing Address -S •'!A'A'Ra3 DRUG ORci-.f^c UrilVE NAVAKflE. MN ^ I rr'i^L u uT r 1 L u ’ * ‘f ' . r - ia X..V w vv V -1? C- n:^ w J. *zL*\\ iniiiS ti ^.vv-..yp /- / w^A-v YOU Phone Number a)yi nOl T14: Ai /V.* VX/ W'V. 3. Principal business carried->on at this location _________________________________ '• 15i:;^tnr.«itn; S^US ^:^hrbit ed pe^To -TdiHancrri^ ^-d Serl^ Effective date 5/1/90.) : hereby make *°'he ‘ lawV ot the^S tatVVf ^MinnesotV^nd the Irdinances^of the City ot Orono during the following quarterly periods: LICENSE FEES May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-J an Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quartets, at $5.00 pet quartet. «lake remittance payable to; CITY OF MONO Signature of applicant Dated CITYof ORONO Post OfEoe Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices 473-735S FAX-4734)510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CICA^TTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Cod^ Section 5.24 9^ 1. Name of Applicant - - - --- - Mailing Address ^ 3 ^^^ ki£^//V^A/ City/State/Zip Code ^^ Phone Number ^^^ Sales Location: Name _ _ _ _ _ _ J 40'7ff Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number ; ^ t • t:'r”‘»;a--J.--- VWV ^ ^7/- f U S •' • V V 3. Principal business carried on at this location 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter , ■■■■ j-g----:------- (Vending machine sales prohibited pec Ordinance 81# 2nd Series. Effective date 5/1/90.) I h^*reby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Ocono during the following quarterly periods: LICENSE FEESFeb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. CITY of Po«t Office Box 66«Cry8Ul Bey. Minneeota 55323 • Municipel OCB< FAX-4734510 473.735*,--Tv ;^.r ~r.r,vn u Jk ' c*» Wf »U*|1V-' APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGA^TTES AT Orono Municipal Code Section 5. rr 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address ,v> 1.: ** »i.- . i-V .T.‘:L£'«'^‘?'“?rTA%,V iC\} Ll-l-’i i<0l City/State/Zip Code Phone Number V ~7r^<:: >-/ 2» Sdles liOCCLticnj Name_______/> Street Address Mailing Addr** -* rl. Phone Number __ _ _ 'y-7/ —V 3. Principal busl-’ ss carried on at this location 1. Method of Sales: Over Countersaui pco^rbltad^V oF^anc^sI^ Effective date 5/1/90.) I hereby make o^'^MifnerolV^ana tSe =rirnanl°ro£ Wciirof Orono'durln, the following quarterly periods: Cl Feb-Mar-Apr j><^ May-June-July _ _ _ Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31# each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in tne case of seasonal sales, this may e pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. CITY Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minn FAX - 47M5I0 i: I 473.T35S APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address City/State/Zip Code Phone Number «W>BM tWWW INftUUX Ilf w«53JSStr** 2.Sal“S Location: Name \----^iUPAlVvX VI / w* Jt. Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number MnA 3. Principal business carried on at this locationr ^ISSlritid^t^ancr-S” Ind S«i.— Effective date 5/1/90.) I hereby nak^ o£ "Mi^nesV/a'and tS* ,ua.tarly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr ^ May-June-July 'y Aua-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 pet auarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO Signature of applicant Dated \\y(ol ^ CITY^POIRSfO Post OfTio* Bos 66*Cry«Ui Boy. MinncooU 55323• Munidpol OfBcs 473-73M FKX - 47M5J0 ,f£B ;9 1995 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGAMTTE^ AT RETAIL Otono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant - - - --- - - - - -- Mailing Address \ LO » UOA City/State/2ip Code Phone Number f | 3(~V7 _ \ I L6V\c *>t Sal “3 T.oo.’tion: Name OV or^O ^ i;. cr. street Address ^\^C) ^^« LOtl Mailing Address Phone Number 2. I_ 3. Principal business carried on at this location i r,-^v!g,ir>c<£. ^-Wg,______ 4. llA 'i CF CF^fQ . I, \ ^ ^ i_ •. c w* -wuAM 4 -> <• •* • , k 7 • w - I TV X W’U. f Ti n.* . V •. • • • • V t * t f« V' • vv d.ziFi rCil ‘'(Vending^machine salel prohibited per Ordinance 81, 2nd Series.' Effective date 5/1/90.) I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at Love lo^^ation subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Otono during the following quarterly perio . Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July ^ Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, eacn year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quar ter. [lake remittance payable to; CITY OF OROHO Signature of applicant Dated CITYofORONO Po«t Office Boi 66«CrycUl Bey. MinneeoU 55323*Munidpel Officee 473-73SI FAX - 47341510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGA^TTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.2 X Name of Applicant Mailing Address __rlr iri City/State/Zip Code _ Phone Number Hi I - T 7 2-5 19 95 U A I I C !*“ W MWMe l^lL^CiCO ■:1 S 'e. w w -------:-------------------^.K • \\ •- w A i L *« V • w V........ .. .. wU IJ ' » wc : f .* .. w. A M V A » i •• " * •*.**» * vx..' vi ^ .Sstl^s Lccs^icn: P '5aui^±^l^U]l±Name Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number j V'X c S>y/^ />V (j 01" 6 ^ L^/1 Af^LT t'l 11 -r ~7z- r factor/ ^S'3^ 3. Principar. business carried on at this location —^ ^ e I 4.Method of Sales: Over Counter Other ^vending machin4 sales prohibited pet Ordinance 01, 2nd Series.” Effective date 5/1/90.) T hereby mak» application for license to sell cigarettes at at the Lov/ location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly perio . Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO Signature of applicant Dated Il^t hi CITYof ~ j Po9t OtTice Box 66 • Crystal Bay. MinnesoU 55323 • Municipal OfBcaa 47J.735i E\X - 473-0510 cpo 2 1995 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGA^TTES ^ RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.*2 19^3 r\fsg.o E>l r1. Name of Applicant __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mailing Address 333 3 I City/State/2ip Code KitQYJ/9-y^^-f Phone Number C> *7 / " - - - - - --- - - -- Sales Location: Name Dr- A/AYJ/hCAt /^'•J ilTTr wf ’ i ■ ' f *f : vn A w'J. V VV'V____ vi i.v«v - i,k._ 1 u, * * • i _ m • rl itJJ t-W'Vi MV A » -i V V_ Mailing Address ^Th/y t-_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Phone Number _ _ _ _ _^ 73. 3, Principal business carried on at this location 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter OtherMetnou ot aai’sai - - - - --— - _—_——— (Vending machine sales prohibited per Ordinance 81,2nd Effective date 5/1/90.) []aa71^ es.yi I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at '«tai^ above location sub ject to the laws of the State of ' ordinances of the City of Otono during the following quarterly perio s. LICENSE FEES 9< ?eb-Mar-Apr May-June-July "y Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITO OF ORONO Signature of applicant<jg^ Dated / - Po«t Oflic* Boa 66«Cry«Ul Bay. Minneaota 55323 *| FAX -473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Ocono Municipal Code Section 5.2JAN 3 1 1995 19^5 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address City/State/2 ip Code Phone Number •5axes Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number (612) 473-8846 SAME AS ABOVE 3. Principal business carried on at this location Lit t W'!^ "'i uC ,-£wA f u V••A • V • V , • • •! : - ■h~\ 0 l :v1 -'^jl '1- • A *L a. w* 4 Method of Sales: Over Counter jg— — ir.^ series—"vending machine sales prohibited per Ordinance 81, ISd Series. Effective date 5/1/90.) I hereby mate Vrto'°the‘!a"«? c! ^hi^taf/o^Minnes'cVa'and IT. orirnancerof°the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31» each year. Annual license fee is » $20.00. Where applicable, as in tne case of seasonal sales, this niay e pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Signature of applicant Date: To: From: Subject: February 2, 1995 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Steve Sulliveui, Chief of Polic On Sale 3.2 Beer License Lakeview Golf Course j reviewed the applicatxon from Grant Wenkstern on behalf of the Lakeview Golf Course for a 3.2 Beer License. All background checks have been conducted and I have no objection to the issuance of this license. *1 I« Form No. 235- Ap|.Tu#ii..« fi»t Itniil I Jcr«^ »• SrM N»H iMi««irslin| M»li **tlN** |*rvm«^. RETAIL SALE” ^tate o( illimusota, coo.vir or_Ucmisp^-Cd^Orono To the.................(^o«.nc.!..(..............of the .................of.... rci_oi __iil-™. State of Minnesota: Ktreby appltXX-for a licent« for th* term of----0*?..?-^ from, the____.............................. ...................«>/------------------------------------------------- At Retail Only, Non-Intoxicatin* Malt Liqaors, « .am-5 ar« ty lav. for :on»nr«ptwn "O.r* thoso eeriaU premUto In tko....... d€MCiiJbed as follows, Uywit:. -......— ta sell «••••••♦••••♦.._0..r..s?i?..o.._........ at which place said applicant...operate the business o/..AQ-KjCV ..~iS QI ^ * P — •••***« and to that end represent and state as follows: TluU $aid applicant ............^.....................«*»<■" <>f c^aracter and repute; and ha attained the age of tl year*; that.......-S'? • <<...........................proprietor ... of tho ettabUshment for which the lice^.ee will bo ioiucd if this application is granted. That no manufacturer of such non-intoauatint rruilt lUtuors hao any ownership, in wholo or in pari, in said business of said applicant...or any interest therein; That said applicant. make Ihie application pursuant and subject to all tho laws of tho Stalo of Jllinncsota and the ordinances and regulations of said...........................—------------------------ applUahU thereto, whi- h are herehy mada a part hereof, and hereby agrto ....lo observo and obey tho tame; ||l«r« ilHee ronalromonla. If mmf, •# rtO**W***l f~ iIkE i TM . iw*a.’V vvv 01 biH Lhilh !i iCO liSyi’tiO ClVi ilOl JlbtOl •r ,*.> » ».' • W V * C* .« • vv Each appheam further states that by the commence,ueut of business and b, July / of each suev^dint oppheant util hove paid the Federal Special Occupatmnal Tax to the Bureau of Aholwl. Tobacco and Firearms for a retail dealer. Vl.-. Dated.......Jfln KOi .'■j-----igyA.. Permit #:_ Fee: $50.00 PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Phone Number: - - - Name: _ ___ _ _ ___ _ > % •* . V Address: ^ City, state. Zip: L^a /c^ La I<^_ Location of Parade or Event •J^A ✓ / Person(s) and/or Organization(s) Handling the Event: Date of Event: Reason or Purpose: Hours orp Event: ^C Amount: -q.’/' Insurance Company: ,-o be subSittad with this application.Copy of insurance ce frAm the parade or spec Approved:Denied: CITY OF ifHf' um0 ----- Ti I Y'J. i.c- -t i< ■ - Sv‘iwC!av wvv- 'v-J., ff,* ,^v • 01 y —j ak« • • JAN 3 1995 Permit #:_ Fee: $50.00 PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Phone Number: ^- - - Name : /n o/g _____^ ---------------------— Address: 3^ ^0 Sk^Crof^ (^i>cL TV / ' ijfjA^A ! / 8City, State, Zio: / ; ^ j______- - - ------------------------------- , Location of Parade or -...........^ /■/-V' 4 A\^^rUr- J-^r- A/a) n... Pvent: O. Apr, /£T B°“'= Event: f?i?0 - <0 ' --------- Reason or Purpose; --------- Amount : andparade: special “"^,\^-3bttities thkt nay arisi directly or indirectly irSS°tl;e"pira"de « special event approved by the granting of this pemrt. SignaSni rj/^Datfe Approved: Remarks: Denied:By; .r.n« rro • " CITY OF CpC^O^ fli^r^CE il-l-Iit iJx J*-rvvvvV . . 01 £f.V ‘■'urrv’ J1 i^i'.v'v ’■'n'-i.-niv-v^'i.v yffi,;hi.tii t * '.•™»f'. 1' — -. 1^15^4;) iOOl . /V^- i»X/ ieW/ 01.06'55 15:20 THP fjF npijrin 612-JVJ-Vif.? CITY OF ORONO (012) 473-7357 2750 Kelley Parkway, p.o. Hot 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 SEPTIC S VSTEMINSTAIXERS LICENSE .APPLICATION All qucslicns must be answerec License fee. ’ -.J. Certificate of Insurance and evidence of MPC a Cenification must be atLicJied. All appli';ation>' arc subject to a ten (10) day app.'-ovai period. 1. Bu.siness or trade name , JZnc ______________ 2. Business addrcs.s 1‘SL'!^ ______C^DU (iirefij 3. Business pbonc^__O ^ 'P- .93 tcicy) (/.p) Residence phone i^l-Cyi.Lc'? A.Narne of anpl'catu or company lepiescnfauvc^s) holding MPCA certification H-I Xoc ■________________________ 5. Type of certification held: _Installer Ihimper Expiration date: 6. Have >ou ever held a Septic Systen, Installer license in Orono before?_I\) Q Most recent year______________ Ha\C you ever i;ad a license revoked? _When? ______________________ Whctc? 8. Do you dj Municipal Sewer hook-ups^ '■'es No 9. Do you pump cut septic tanks? Yes . No SLT5MITT.VLS REQUIRED: CIT'i CF^ FlivAi'^CE OFFICE ! * i -sV .Vi.Via AwVW W * wni v.i cyt ^ iww rif »^ ‘xziElFT-TF^S fiO nIOziiO CCOl fiOl lU r. *» . * %^V* • Vr,-) ; W* V • V nivx.' a- -e::. I- 2. 3. $50.0<7 License application fee. S2,000.09 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be -accepted. $50'100-300,000 minimum Ceiiificate of Insurance. Copy of current MPCA Ccnificatc. LICENSES WELL NUT BE PROCESSED UNTIL .\LL mvMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons either than applic.ant who are authorized by y(?u to aoidv f'nr nertnit-s under your licetisc The undersigned h.ereby makes appiicatirm to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a liccn.se to lastaH and repair reptic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, su^eci to the laws of the State of Mimic ota anrf fhr» C^rAtnAnC^^ of ihf (^IfV nf Oinrin __Xand the Ordinances of the City of Oiono. Date J ^Aoclicant'sSiemfure CI TY Staff recommendation: Approval Denial Date Reason for denial:U.5K ONLY City Couticil Act;v''n: Date_Ariproved Denied ciTy or ORONO p.O. Box 66, 1325 So Brown Dare i*o.cense ^ Crvsral Eav, MN 55323 .-rmw ttcrRSS Initial Review Fee - Sou.00 APPLICATION POR ANNUAL HOME OCCI7BA-. Annual Review Fee -$30.00 D A D PPnwT-. U ! 3^ -4‘71- --------- NAME: Lg-Knv/ A. ^ ^ V ----------------------- ------------ AEDRESsT /yq \s~ ‘P - ployees with^ operation: Anolication Da^e; ‘* Date License Approvec:^___ Date License Expires* No. of of thi,^appli«ti=n. Tvpe of Busipess P= b. OperaPef:. r r" ^ - - - - - - - -— shaXl liav© f^-ve license nay be revoke- if 'l^“\“^^^oate" and «ake a recommendation (S) bnsinlss days in. yhica to a“.03. If a site pnrsnant to Orono Monacipal S«~ ^ extended to ten CIO) is required by City staff. ^ “^4 staff reccamaendation .wall be business days. The 2-^=“®?, nS* reotlarly scheduled meeting held •scheduled before tbe ____ on tlie second and ..ou— .-li Moncay __mjaimi------:=SiS'Si%S.s.ss.sTT?f “ “ “ *■ V •“ Z * - s • i iAl f V* U-r VMW *• _ •, Z ■' i -I 4 Prohibited Ecnie Occupation P.ac —-es. 1 r. -3 u-.a„iu^ for a.-.v business cperauing as a hone encace in cpe_a —c.. ----. . -i,-,,’, ,-wu ^ ^ - .a -.-4 -• V 1 J • - • • . » - A •' • Wm ^ •A.11 nerscns engaged in the business must res- •No ccrrnercial signs permitted ether than x’esidential zone.• 4. -No excessive stock in nrade may be stored on •inOver the center rctai 1 sales is net allowed. strucuure. ______*s,«k-—________ =,«»=«=*»--”=»==**=====*”^““"““ ^"r,-c:js cuoted above from the Orcno IlllScil^onditicrs the-City may require. .. —>4—- ■ CITr'usrONLT: of iVcsn'sr''**^'^^ ^«7-^ 'L--------i------ .pprcval cf Licensesllowinc; ______ .cnature cf Zoning Off icialr^V .gnature cf Fire Inspecncr: kU/jU^ Memo: to City Council From: Lyle Oman Building Official Re: LeRoy Pilgrim, 1795 Sludywood. Home Occupation Application Mt. Pilgrim la requesting a S^tpl^e^cLpltance wid. city code. It is my "0 mat *is opemtfon would comply with the home occupatton Itcense requtmments. V /. Cv ^ /■ ^ # .J ( PR:' CS' PRREGCR EM? a NA.MS DPT 471S33CS0 474553339 476921819 471340871 475443862 468843003 472503991 469526026 475989721 463821013 472529007 453701363 469636562 468420332 476020397 46908782 ^ 474667812 475330151 477500656 475444249 477453877 471569363 471348130 472500574 121262417 475344512 430843542 477551040 470987727 477700023 334506231 468909535 476783251 476866274 470700901 469848107 471487919 474167795 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 47556 9177 257460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 BORIS. SCOTT W BCSMA, JAMIr. L SRINKHAUS, ‘jOhN F CARLSON, ® CHESWICK, G«R| B CCRNICK, JA.VES L CEMBOUSKI^ JAY C ENGLISH III. ERICKSON, KURT R nSCHENICH, dan T GAFFRCN, MICHAbL P GERKARESCN. JCrUl R GCMA:J, ANITA D. GCMA*N, DAVID J GREGCLY, JAMES D KALLIN. DCRCTf' M HA:1SEN, STEVEN C HAT.SING. CARCL_o HASEMATJ, CARCLb JOHNSON, BRADLEY P KNCLLENBERG, KRISTIN KUEHN. THOMAS M MA3USTH, JEANNs. A MCINTYRE, WILLIA.M E MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MELTON, NEIL W. MILLER, CHRISTOPHER MCORSE, RONALD u M0RCWC2YNSKI, JnMES OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OLSON, JOHN C. OMAN, LYLE E palmer, GREGORY A PERSELL, WILLIAM R. PETERSON, JACK W COAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X THOMTON, MARK R TCMCKECK, LAWRENCE F tomczyk. mark w 31 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 35 42 12 42 31 12 31 31 15 33 YTD GROSS 5368.00 3224.06 3795.33 1716 .47 4968.00 643.59 5323.68 5439.69 5152 .04 540vj .35 4034.56 4653.60 4624.95 6775.93 295.77 723.44 4077.93 3912.48 3700.65 1998.50 3195.00 5036.00 930.94 6681.60 5687.77 175505292 VAI^G, BRUCE L 468629483 VEE, LINDA S 477881539 WECJ04AN, STEPHEN J 93 90.40 31 4967.72 31 325 .41 15 3387.62 12 7548 .32 31 5106 .49 42 4008.78 92 3797.15 15 2866 .48 33 4624.96 42 3711.07 31 1111.67 93 129.25 92 4475.01 92 3529.07 31 2791.17 42 3496.86 93 3984.16 31 6531.84 31 4902.23 31 4744.08 31 4834.56 33 3984.15 12 3184.97 33 3694.17 CURRENT GROSS 1674.40 1071 20 1335.62 533 .74 1656.00 61.71 1774.56 1644.43 1584.03 1596.19 1611.52 1551.20 1555.52 2180.31 109.32 253.33 1261.19 1304.16 1240.19 687 .48 1071.20 1611.52 308.38 2227.20 1395.93 90.40 1576.68 157.09 1160.17 2449.44 1883.46 1229.45 1325.97 964.08 1555.52 1411.75 577.88 38.50 1667.15 1240.18 3272.65 240.17 1340.00 2177.28 1581.36 1581.36 1611.52 1340.00 1071.20 1242.48 63,641.12 •• • • I r • fCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Feb 9 1995 00:22:36CHECK NO 032417 032416 CHECK DATE 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/]3 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1295/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 CHECK AMOUNT VENDORALBINSON DESCRIPTION STEREO SCOPE ACCOUNT U 0174-4210 0360-4305 0355-4305 INVOICE376223 942208 41512 PO NUM.Page 1 MANUALOH OH OH 032419 032420 032421 032422 032423 032424 032425 032426 $300.73$308.73* $158.00 $109.50 $267.50* AMERICAN ENC^INEERING T CYLINDERS - BROWN RD AMERICAT4 ENGINEERING T OCB RD BRIDGE TESTIN $50.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN DEC SERVICES 0200-4304 32605 OH $332.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLIC-APRIL 0840-4305 029040-1 OH $220.50 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN FEMA FLOOD INS MTG 0200-4305 32605 OH $123.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG MAY SERVICES 0200-4305 029303-1 OH $1,429.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLIC DEC 0840-4305 32605 OH $441.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN MSA GEN DEC 0200-4305 032606 OH $777.77 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD BRIDGE INSP-D 0355-4305 032607 OH $761.3f BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD RFP #2-DEC 0361-4305 032608 OH $246.33 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD INSP-DEC 0361-4305 032609 OH $1,008.25 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BROWN RD INSP DEC 0360-4305 032610 OH $191.25 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN LEAD/COPPER STUDY 0549-4305 032611 OH $100.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN JULY SERVICE 0200* 4304 030301 OH $518.30 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN JULY SERVICE 0200-4305 030301 OH $1,543.89 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLIC JULY 0040-4305 030301 OH $63.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OBA ENG JULY 0200-4305 030301 OH $228.76 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN TOPO MAPS JULY 0200-4305 030301 OH $183.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN BASE MAPS JULY 0200-4305 030301 OK $689.38 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN KELLY AVE STORM SWR 0419-4305 030301 OH $438.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN WTR TREATMENT PLAN 0549-4305 030301 OH $641.00 $9,985.79* BONESTROO ROSENE ASN I&I STUDY - L.S. UPG 0569-4305 030301 OH $12.00 $12.00* $20.00 $20.00* $20.13 $20.12 $40.25* $100.00 $100.00* Si,026.00 $1,020.00* $34.70 $34.70* $2,422.55 $2,422.55* DPC INDUSTRIES INC GERRING'S CAR WASH GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL HENN CO TREASURER HENN CTY FIN DIV CHLORINE CAR WASH TICKETS DECEMBER CALLS DECEMBER CALLS ENTRANCE PERMIT-BROW ROOM Sc BOARD-DEC HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT BOOKING FEES-DEC MATHEWS FARMS HAUL CONTAMINATED SO 0549-4234 0129-4232 0549-4306 0569-4306 0360-4532 0060-4358 0080-4350 0651-4306 D01080424 002390 4120526 4120526 22963 2801 002391 002392 OH OH OH OH OH OH OK COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Feb 9 1995 00.22:36 Pag* 2CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT M INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL$34.71 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC WASH SCI TITLE REG 0080-4303 416017 OH$302.31 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC G. NELSON LEGAL-DEC 0080-4303 416017 OH $1,998.44 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC DEC LEGAL APPLIC 0640-4303 416C17 OH $716.19 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC NOV SERVICE 0080-4303 414256-1 OH $361.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL-NELSON NOV 0080-4303 414258-1 OH $184.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LASHER LANDING-DEC 0080-4303 416017 OH $1,607.64 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL APPLIC-NOV 0840-4306 414258-1 OH $1,587.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC MPRS LAWSUIT-DEC 0080-4303 416017 OH $2.88 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL-LASHER LAI4DING 0840-4303 414258-1 OH $418.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC OCT SERVICE 0080-430?411293-1 OH $38.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL - NELSON OCT 0080-4303 411293-1 OH $44.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL-LASHER LANDING 0080-4303 411293-1 OH $3,519.20 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC LEGAL APPLIC-OCT 0840-4303 411293-1 OH $1,106.60 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC DEC SERVICE 0080-4301 416017 OH $107.50 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC DEC SERVICE 0080-4303 416017 OH $935.00 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC PERSONNEL-P.D. DEC 0080-4303 416017 OH $213.40 $13,175.87* POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC AFFIRM ACTION P.D.-D 0080-4303 416017 OH $685.65 $685.65* PUMP &METER 1SERVICES CORE EXCHANGE-GAS SO 0099-4343 93412 OH 032427 032428 032429 032430 03241,1 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 . ’>95/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $412.50 $412.50* $120.00 $120.00* $1,328.58 $1,328.58* $30,022.12 SCHOENING EXCAVATING TRI-CITY LABS WAYZATA-CITY OF HAUL MASTER GRADER WATER TESTING WATER PURCHASED - 4T 0249-4331 0549-4306 9672-1299 002388 002389 002393 OH OH OH COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Feb 9 1996 00:22:38 Pag* 1FUNDit001GENERAL FUND $20,977.90FUNDit115BLDG CAP 0/L FD $2,422.55FUNDit423MUN ST AID CO/FD $3,161.21 FUND it 424 PERM IMP REV FD $689.38 FUND H 672 WTR OPERATING FD $2,109.96 FUND U 673 SWR OPERATING FD $661.12 $30,02? 12 • • « • •• ♦ %• • *NI • • *1^COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 00*35:50CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR Page 1DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT i INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0174-4210 376223 OH0360-4305 942200 OH 0355-4305 41512 OH 0040-4305 030301 OH 0419-4305 030301 OH 0200-43u4 030301 OH 0200-4305 030301 OH 0200-4305 0303C1 OH 0200-4305 029303-1 OH 0040-4305 029040-1 OH 0549-4305 032611 OH 0360-4305 032610 OH 0361-4305 032609 OH 0361-4305 032608 OH 0355-4305 032607 OH 0200-4305 032606 OH 0840-4305 32605 OH 0200-4305 030301 OH 0200-4305 32605 OH 0200-4304 32605 OH 0569-4305 030301 OH 0549-43C5 030301 OH 0200-4305 030301 CH 0549-4234 D01080424 OH 0129-4232 002390 OH 0L69-4306 4120526 OH 0549-4306 4120526 OH 0360-4532 22963 OH 0080-435B 2801 OH 0000-4358 002391 OH 0651-4306 002392 OH 032417 032418 032419 032420 032421 032422 032423 032424 032425 032426 1995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $308.73$300.73*$158.00 $109.50 $267.50* ALBINSON STEREO SCOPE $1,543 $€09 $100 $518 $183 $123 $332 $191 $1,000 $246 $761 $777 $441 $1,429 $228 $220 $50 $641 $430 $63 $9,905 .09 .38 .00 .30 .00 .00 . 00 .25 .25 .33 .36 .77 .00 .00 .76 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .79* $12.00 $12.00* 20.00 20.00* 20.12 20.13 $40.25* $100.00 $100.00* $1,020.00 $1,020.00* $34.70 $34.70* $2,4.'>2.55 $2,422.55* AMERICAN ENGINEERING T CYLINDERS - BROWN RD AMERICAN ENGINEERING T OCB RD BRIDGE TESTIN BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN DPC INDUSTRIES INC. GERRING'S CAR WASH GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONEChl.L HENN CO TREASURER HENN CTY FIN DIV ENG APPLIC JULY KELLY AVE STORM SWR JULY SERVICE JULY SERVICE BASE MAPS JULY ENG MAY SERVICES ENG APPLIC-APRIL LEAD/COPPER STUDY BROWN RD INSP-DEC OCB RD INSP-DEC OCB RD RFP #2-DEC OCB RD BRIDGE INSP-D MSA GEN DEC ENG APPLIC DEC TOPO MAPS JULY FEMA FLOOD INS MTG DEC SERVICES lUl STUDY - L.S. UPG WTR TREATMENT PLAN OBA ENG JULY CHLORINE CAR WASH TICKETS DECEMBER CALLS DECEMBER CALLS ENTRANCE PERMIT-BROW ROOM fit BOARD-DEC HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT BOOKING FEES-DEC MATHEWS FARMS HAUL CONTAMINATED SO COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 00:35:501995/0^/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR$361.00 vopum HAIK fc ASSOC$418.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC$44.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $38.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $1,106.60 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $1,607.64 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $2.83 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $3,519.20 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $716.19 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $935.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $213.40 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $34.71 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $302.31 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $107.50 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $1,998.44 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $1,587.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $184.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC DESCRIPTIONLEGAL-NELSON NOV OCT SERVICE LEGAL-LASHER LANDING LEGAL - NELSON OCT DEC SERVICE LEGAL APPLIC-NOV LEGAL-LASHER LANDING LEGAL APPLIC-OCT NOV SERVICE PERSONNEL-P.D. DEC AFFIRM ACTION P.D.-D WASH SCI TITLE REG G. NELSON LEGAL-DEC DEC SERVICE DEC LEGAL APPLIC MPRS LAWSUIT-DEC LASHER LANDING-DEC 032427 $13,175.07* 032428 1995/02/13 $605.65 $605.65* PUMP & METER SERVICES 032429 1995/02/13 $412.50 $^12.50* SCHOENING EXCAVATING 032430 1995/02/13 $120.00 $120.00* TRI-CITY LABS 032431 1995/02/13 $1,320.E:0 $1,320.50* WAYZATA-CITY OF 032435 1995/02/13 $19. $19.55* A T t T 032436 1995/02/13 $4.21 $4.21* A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC 032437 1995/02/13 $65.00 $65.00* AIA MINNESOTA 032438 1995/02/13 $375.41 $375.41* ANCHOR PAPER 012439 1995/02/13 $1,991.00 $1,991.00* ANTHONY V. SINICROPI 032440 1995/02/13 $ .70 $.70* AT 6T CORE EXCHANGE-GAS SO HAUL MASTER GRADER WATER TESTING WATER PURCHASED - 4T PHONE CHARGE-1ST QTR AIA SEMIN/..’-B. VANG Page 2 COPY PAPER LONG DISTANCE BILL % ACCOUNT It INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL0080-4303 414258-1 OH0080-4303 411293-1 OH0080-4303 411293-1 OH 0080-4303 411293-1 OH 0080-4301 416017 OH 0840-4306 414258-1 OH 0840-4303 414258-1 OH 0840-4303 411293-1 OH 0080-4303 414258-1 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0840-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0080-4303 416017 OH 0099-4343 93412 OH 0249-4331 002388 OH 0549-4306 002389 OH 9672-1299 002393 OH 0129-4320 002350 OH 0249-4232 016780 OH 0174-4356 002370 OH 0099-4210 04565701 OH 0080-4303 002341 OH 0129-4320 002344 OH * ^ •% 0 9 ^ • 0 % 0 • n 00 ^ %. wCOUNCIL CHECK NO CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 00:35:50VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACroUNT #INVOICE •Page 3. PO NUM. MANUAL0324411995/02/131995/02/13 $44.05$1.75$45.80*ATSiT INFO SYSTEM ATiT INFO SYSTEM PHONE EQUIP MAINT-FE CIVIL DEFENSE CHARGE 0129-43400175-4320 5218813288002360 OHOH 032442 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $34.58 $39.84 $74.42* ATVT Ar:.T LONG DISTANCE CHARGE LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 0129-4340 0129-4340 002357 002358 OH OH 032443 1995/02/13 $20.00 $20.00* ATOM DUES-TOMCHECK 0X..9-4380 002327 OH 032444 1995/02/13 $26.88 $26.88* AUGIES MOBILE CHEF SANDWICHES 0591-4802 002351 OH 032445 1995/02/13 $5,207.40 $5,207.40* BARTON SAND/GRAVEI.SAND 0249-4233 002383 OH 032446 1995/02/13 $320.00 $320.00* BELL & HOWELL MAINT AGREEMENT '95 0099-4340 5056266 OH 032447 1995/02/13 $168.58 $168.58* BLACKOWIAK & SONS JAN SERVICE 0099-4343 164188 OH 032440 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $136.00 $12.18 $148.18* BORIS,SCOTT BORIS,SCOTT OFFICERS ASSOC MTG MILEAGE REIMB-BORIS 0129-4356 0129-4381 002366 002342 OH OH 032449 1995/02/13 $992 .40 $992.40* BRAUN INTERTEC ENG CMKS-93-0163 0651-4306 055904 OH 032450 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $15.92 $105.26 $14.91 $136.09* BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING HAND STAMP FOR ABUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE CARDS 8 LARGE COPIES 0129-4322 0129-4322 0099-4322 47774 47770 002411 OH OH OH 032451 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $18.19 $18.20 $36.39* CELLULARONE CELLULARONE CELL PHONE UTILITIES CELL PHONE UTILITIES 0569-4320 0549-4320 002354 002354 OH OH 032452 1995/02/13 $6.00 $6.00* CHESWICK/GARY PTAC LUNCH REIMS 0129-4356 00'^337 OH 032453 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $150.33 $234 .49 $41.37 $426.19* CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE TUNE UP «172 BRAKES #171 CHECK BRAKES #168 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 5322E 5320R 5392 OH OH OH 032454 1995/02/13 $150.00 $150.00*CIRCUIT RESEARCH CORP LAB TESTING 0549-4306 50120400 OH tOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10:heck no check date check amount1995^2/13032455 032456 032457 032458 032459 032460 032461 032462 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $5,441.00$5,441.00*$22,260.50$22,260.50* $16,474.00 $16,474.00* $7.45 $9.77 $8.50 $5.52 $11.27 $4.00 $.01 $45.36 $91.88* $211.90 $50.60 $262.50* 1995 00:35:50VENDOR _ _ _CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H St TRANSF1ST QTR FIRE PROTECTCITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF MOUND CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO OF ORONO COCA COLA VENDING COCA COLA VENDING 1ST QTR FIRE SERVICE FLOWERS FOR FUNERAL- NAPKINS St HAND SOAP PARKING FEES-GERHARD HOLE-IN-ONE PLAQUE FRAMES FOR COUNCIL MAIL HOLE-IN-ONE PLA ADD'L POSTAGE MISC SUPPLIES POP POP FOR RESALE li:160.66 160.66* $180.99 $180.99- $189.87 $189.87* 032463 1995/02/13 $998.00 $998.00* 032464 1995/02/13 $30.02 $30.02* 032465 1995/02/13 $34 .30 $34.30* 032466 1995/02/13 $298.89 $298.89* 032467 1995/02/13 $245.C‘"> $24 -.JO* 032468 1995/02/13 $1,'>3.64 $1,238.64* CONCEPT MICROFiLM INC MICF FICHE SERVICES CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR #2 SOFTENER COPY DUP PR INC CORNERHOUSE INTERAGEN CT SYSTEMS D.L.G. CO. DAHLGREN SHARDLOW DAHLKE TREE SERVICE ACCOUNT tt 9999-20300130-4315 0132-4317 0020- 0099- 0249 0590 0020 0590 0099 0099 4399 4231 4381 4210 ■4399 •4321 -4321 -4210 0591-4802 0591-4802 0129-4210 0549-4345 Page 4INVOICEPO NUM. MANUAL002381OH00233COH 002339 OH 002387 002387 002387 002387 002387 002387 002387 002387 OH OH OK OH OH OH OH OH 3183893 3253704 OH OH 29677 OH 3477 OH COPIER LEASE-FEB 0129-4210 2070323 OH '95 INTERVIEWING CON 0129-4306 122 OH MANHOLE SOFTENER GAS 0549-4232 1970 OH DRIVERS LICENSE GUID 0129-4240 002328 OH CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGI.jU 0400-4306 16314 OH REMOVE XMAS LIGHTS 0099-4343 002324 OH MICROFILM SERVICES 0174-4306 015511 OH <• * •• ••• ^ • m «A' -"•••*■44COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT032469032470032471 032472 032474 032475 032476 032477 03247d 1995/02/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 199S/.''?/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 ’995/02/13 1995/'.i/l? 1995/Oi/l* $55.00$55.00*$5,422.92$5,422.92*$30.00 $30.00* $90.00 $100.00 $80.00 $80.00 $350.00* $2.60 $66.66 $15.49 $39.27 $39.27 $47.49 $127.32 $69.02 $64.74 $2.60 $15.49 $15.49 $2.60 $15.49 $2.60 $47.49 $573.62* $74.93 $74.93* $50.00 $50.00* $72.47 $23.13 $7.94 $103.54* $24.50 $24.50 $49.00* $90.00 $90.00 1995 00:35:50VENDORDIVISION OF EMERGENCY Page 5DESCRIPTION REGISTRATION-TOMCHECE-Z RECYCLINGFEED RITE CONTROLS FROST, SHERRY R. FROST, SHERRY R. FROST. SHERRY R. FROST, SHERRY R. G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G fc & & & & & & & & & & Sc Sl Sc Sc Sc SERVICES s!:"-,:cES s:.VICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES K SERVICES K SERVICES K K K K K K K K K K K K K K GALL'S INC. GANGELHOFF, DONNA GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOVERNMT TRAING SERV GOVERNHT TRAING SERV RECYCLING COSTS-JANCONTAINER CHARGE-6 C CITY COUNCIL MTG PL7U4 COMMISSION MTG PARK COMMISSION MTG CITY COUNCIL MTG STEFFENHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES RATHBUN, QUAST FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS STREET EMPLOYEES FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN. QUAST RATHBUN, QUAST STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN, QUAST STEFFENHAGEN STREET EMPLOYEES UI7IFORMS-PD STAFF DEER PICKUP MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS JAN SERVICE J7U4 SERVICE L7UJD USE WORKSHOP-MA LAND USE WORKSHOP-OM ACCOUNT M PO NUM. MANUAL0175-4356 002410 • s 1 o 111111••111111110295-4392 002329 OH0549-4234 23551 OH 0039-4306 002360 OH0174-4306 002360 OH0590-4306 002360 OH0039-4306 002360 OH 0590-4221 455419 OH0249-4221 455420 OH0569-4221 455421 OH0099-4343 459249 OH0099-4343 459250 OH0249-4221 444001 OH0099-4343 451622 OH0099-4343 444000 OH0249-4221 447840 OH0590-4221 447839 OH0569-4221 451621 OH0549-4221 444002 OH0590-4221 443999 OH0249-4221 447841 OH0590-4221 451619 V^4 A OH0249-4221 451620 ^^4 m OH 0129-4221 621512001011 OH 0185-4360 002359 OH 0129-4232 002404 OH0249-4232 002404 OH0569-4232 002404 OH 0569-4306 002399 OH0549-4306 002399 OH 0174-4356 002386 OH0174-4356 002385 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 00:35:50 Page 6CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT H INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL032479» « V w «$180.00*1995/02/13 $47.39 GRAINGER-W W GRINDING WHEELS 0249-4232 495-297993-0 OH032480$47.39*OH 1995/02/13 $1,356.50 GREAT WEST LI’^E ASSURA DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002378 032401 $1,356.50* 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $2,300.04 $602.00 $1,204.00 $3,432.44 $341.48 GROUP HEALTH INC. GROUP HEALTH INC. GROUP HEALTH INC. GROUP HEALTH INC. GROUP HEALTH INC. JAN, FEB INSURANCE W JAN, FEB INSURANCE JAN, FEB INSURANCE JAN, FEB INSURANCE JAN, FEB INSURANCE 9999-2030 0590-4151 0249-4151 0129-4151 0174-4151 002332 002332 002332 002332 002332 OH OH OH OH OH 032482 $7,887.96* 1995/02/13 $206.78 HACH CHEMICAL CO FLUORIDE 0549-4345 767835 OH 032403 $206.78* 1995/02/1^$146.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR THOMTON #C026678B 9999-2030 002376 OH 032484 $146.50* OH 1995/02/13 $174.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR SKREEN #C0262310 9999-2030 002377 032485 $174.50* OH 1995/02/13 $385.95 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU 1995 TRAFFIC TICKETS 0129-4322 1094001266 032486 $385.95* 1995/02/13 $100.00 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002374 OH 032487 $100.00* 1995/02/13 $41.67 J 6 R RADIATOR CORP REPLACE HEATER CORE 0249-4342 165842 OH 032488 $41.67* 1995/02/13 $35.00 JOHN BECKMAN ADJUST DOORS IN POLI 0129-4343 002326 OH 032489 $35.00* OH OH OH 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $20.90 $4.64 $20.90 KEAVENYS DRUG KEAVENYS DRUG KEAVENYS DRUG FIRST AID SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0099-4210 0129-4232 0099-4232 002340 002396 002396 032490 $46.44* OH OH OH 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $16.60 $59.21 $6.64 KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE 1-14 TO 2-8 MILEAGE 1-14 TO 2-8 MILEAGE 1-14 TO 2-8 0569-4381 0069-4381 0174-4381 002412 002412 002412 032491 $82.45* 1995/02/13 $350.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR UNION DUES W/H 9999-2030 002375 OH 032492 $350.00* 1995/02/13 $10.53 LEATHERWRIGHTS WORKSHO UNIFORM-CARLSON 0129-4221 002325 OH h.--:’*■ yCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 032493 1995 00:35:50VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # INVOICE 032494 032495 032496 1995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 032502 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $10.53*$1,075.00$65,260.00$10,269.00$1,940.00$2,465.00$5,800.00$821.00 $789.00 $88,439.00* $1.50 $1.50* $602.02 $461.72 $160.71 $532.02 $1,756.47* $1,143.50 $665.33 $1,459.58 $2,528.64 $478.17 $2,016.53 $1,455.05 PO NUM.Page 7 MANUAL 032497 1995/02/13 $480.23 $10,515,98* 032498 1995/02/13 $24,629.00 $24,629.00* 032499 1995/02/13 $3.56 $3.56* 032500 1995/02/13 $195.00 $195.00* 032501 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $31.50 $13.50 $45.00* $1,350.06 $57.51 $823.47 $2,231.04* LMCITLMCITLMCITLMCITLMCITLMCITLMCIT' LMCIT' BERKLEYBERKLEYBERKLEYBERKLEYBERKLEYBERKLEYBERKLEY BERKLEY RISKRISKRISKRISKRISKRISKRISK RISK MCNICKOLS, DAVID MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE UMBRELLA LIAB INS 1995 INSURANCE ALLOC UMBRELLA LIAB INS UMBRELLA LIAB INS UMBRELLA LIAB INS UMBRELLA LIAB INS GEN LIAB INS-PETRO F GEN LIAB INS-OPEM ME PARKING RBIMB-DEPOSI FEB INSURANCE FEB INSURANCE FEB INSURANCE FEB INSURNACE W/H MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH INS-FEB INS-FEB INS-FEB INS W/H-FEB INS-FEB INS-FEB INS-FEB INS-FEB INS-FEB METRO WASTE CONTROL CO SEWER SERVICE FOR MA MIDWEST BSNS PROD MILE DESK PAD-POLICE DRUNK DRIVING CONP-M MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO PUBLIC WORKS GAS CHARGES CITY HALL, PW, POLIC 0549900100990569059001290099 0099 4377129943774377437743774370 4370 0129-4381 0174-4151 0249-4151 0129-4151 9999-2030 0039 0069 9001 9999 0174 0129 0249 0549 0569 4151 4151 1298 2030 4151 4151 4151 4151 4151 9673-1282 0129-4210 0129-4356 0249-4232 0129-4232 0099-4324 0569-4324 0099-4324 55792 OH55769OH55792OH55792OH55792OH55792OH55793OH55797OH 002338 OH 1303547 OH1303547OH1303547OH1303547OH 195032102552 OH195032102552OH195032102552OH195032102552OH195032102552OH 195032102552 OH195032102552‘ OH195032102552• OH 195032102552 OH 51480395 OH 109583 OH 002384 OH RIOl950858 OHRI01950859OH 002335 OH002333OH002334OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Pri Feb 10 1995 00:35:50 Page 8CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0325031995/02/13 $214.14$214.14*MINNE.SOTA BOOK STORE TRAFFIC LAWS BOOKS 0129-4240 002331 OH0325041995/02/131995/02/13 $50.00$2,758.66$2,808.66*MINNESOTA DEPT OP REVE MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE USED OIL DISPOSAL STATE TAX W/H 0249-42209999-2030 002414002380 OHOH0325051995/02/13 $10.00$10.00*MN DEPT LABOR-INDUSTRY EXEMPTION CERT-AIR T 0249-4383 185347 OH 032506 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $334.00 $22.00 $356.00* MN MN DEPT OF REVENUE DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX-JAN SALES TAX-JAN 9672-2222 9001-3500 002395 002395 OH OH 032507 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $150.00 $360.00 $510.00* MN MN DEPT PUB SAFETY DEPT PUB SAFETY CJDN CONNECT CHARGES CJDN CHARGES 4TH QTR 0129-4340 0129-4340 94Q4222 94Q4223 OH OH 032508 1995/02/13 $166.00 $166.00* MN DNR-DIV OF WATERS PERMITS 0549-4383 002346 OH 032509 1995/02/13 $100.00 $100.00* MN GOLF COURSE SUPT MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 0590-4380 002397 OH 032510 1995/02/13 $293.86 $293.86* MN POL RECRNMT SYS 3RD,4TH QTR EXPENSES 0080-4303 002348 OH 032511 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $8.CO $8.00 $24.00 $48.00 $16.00 $8.00 $112.00* MN MN MN MN MN MN POLLUTION CONTROL POLLUTION CONTROL POLLUTION CONTROL POLLUTION CONTROL POLLUTION CONTROL POLLUTION CONTROL A A A A A A VEHICLE TESTING VEHICLE TESTING VEHICLE TESTING VEHICLE TESTING VEHICLE TESTING VEHICLE TESTING 0549-4341 0590-4341 0249-4341 0129-4341 0174-4341 0569-4341 002400 002400 002400 002400 002400 002400 OH OH OH OH OH OH 032512 1995 02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $85.00 $85.00 $85.00 $85.00 $340.00* MN MN MN MN RURAL WATER ASSN. RURAL WATER ASSN. RURAL WATER ASSN. RURAL WATER ASSN. MRWA SEMINAR-PALMER MRWA SEMINAR-SKREEN MRWA SEMINAR-O'BRIEN MRWA SEMINAR-GREGORY 0549-4356 0549-4356 0549-4356 0549-4356 002362 002363 002361 002364 OH OH OH OH 032513 1995/02/13 $100.00 $100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-I)E DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002373 OH 032514 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $26.59 $8.00 $34.59* MOORSE RON MOORSE RON MEALS REIMB-JAN PARKING REIMB-JAN 0039-4356 0039-4381 002402 002402 OH OH 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $204.76 $93.76 MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES UNIFORM-MOROWCZYNSKI UNIFORM REIMB-MOROWC 0129-4221 0129-4221 002369 002345 OH OH % %COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 00:35:50CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT II INVOICE PO NUM.Page 9^ MANUAL032515$298.52* 032516 1995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $58.77$62.27$3.40$1.91$41.11$69.80$16.80$1.68 $12.44 $75.92 $344.10* NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE NAVARRE TRUE VALUEVALUEVALUEVALUEVALUEVALUEVALUEVALUE VALUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES 0290-42320549-42320549-42340174-42320590-42320099-42310569-42320569-4234 0129-4232 0249-4232 002403002403002403002403002403002403002403002403 002403 002403 OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH OH OH 032517 1995/02/13 $3,675.02 $3,675.02* l. 'RTH AMERICAN SALT CO ROAD SALT 0249-4233 846631 OH 032518 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $287.74 $34.34 $103.11 $9.42 $932.58 $1,204.98 $2,058.88 $452.93 $5,083.98* NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS NSP COSTS 0249-4324 0290-4324 0590-4324 0174-4324 0099-4324 0569-4324 0549-4324 0129-4324 002407 002407 002407 002407 002407 002407 002407 002407 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 032519 1995/02/13 $1,077.66 $1,077.66* NSP STREET LIGHT BILL-JA 0249-4325 002330 OH 032520 1995/02/13 $71.34 $71.34* OBERAIGNER,SCOTT SEWER SCHOOL 0549-4381 002365 OH 032521 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $17.40 $14.50 $31.90* OMAII/LYLE OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE TO SCHOOL MILEAGE REIMB-JAN 0174-4356 0174-4381 002401 002401 OH OH 032522 1995/02/13 $50.00 $50.00* OTT, LINDA DOT MATRIX PRINTER P 0129-4540 002405 OH 032523 1995/02/13 $18.82 $18.82* PEBSCO/OBRA DEP COMP W/H 9999-2030 002372 OH 032524 1995/02/13 $1,323.46 $1,323.46* PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYO1 DEP COMP W/H 9999-2030 002371 OH 032525 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $3,588.99 $4,702.96 $8,291.95* PERA PERA PERA W/K PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2030 9999-2031 002382 002382 OH OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 00:35:50 Page 10CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0325261995/02/13 $10.00$10.00*PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR AUGER 0174-4232 14697 032527 1995/02/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $27.30$93.82$38.82 $9.71 $48.53 $16.18 $234.36* PIONEERPIONEERPIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PUBLIC HEARING-CARLS SURFACE USE ORDINANC L.S. #7 AD FOR BIDS MEETING TIME CHANGE LAND USE APPLICATION APPLIC #1995 0174-43230174-43230569-43220039-4323 0174-4323 0174-4323 2481219109183 179 180 OHOHOHOH OH OH 032528 1995/02/13 $133.00 $133.00* PLYMOUTH PLUMBING MTR REFUND 980 COX F 9672-1273 002413 OH 032529 1995/02/13 $53.84 $53.84* PRAIRIE OFFSET PURCHASE ORDERS-100 0099-4322 104409 OH 032530 1995/02/13 $157.50 $157.50* PRECISION BUSINESS SYS MAINT AGREEMENT ' 95 0099-4340 50013 OH 032531 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $170.33 $29.53 $41.53 $257.62 $499.01* PRO TIRE & EXHAUST PRO TIRE it EXHAUST PRO TIRE & EXHAUST PRO TIRE St EXHAUST OIL CHANGE, ALIGN #1 OIL CHANGE #168 OIL CHANGE #166 BRAKES #167 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 4852 4932 4862 4870 OH OH OH OH 032532 1995/02/13 $331.02 $331.02* R St T SPECIALTY INC MATERIALS FOR DARE P 0840-4243 23558 OH 032533 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $61.50 $3.02 $65.32* RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING 0129-4210 0129-4210 3765912 3766497 OH OH 032534 1995/02/13 $2,460.28 $2,460.28* ROLLINS OIL CO UNLEADED GASOLINE 9001-1260 38099 OH 032535 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $126.50 $1,639.35 $1,765.85* SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS FEB CHARGES FEB W/H 0299-4306 9999-2030 13552 13552 OH OH 032536 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $167.50 $172.50 $340.00* SOUTHAM BUS COMM USA SOUTHAM BUS COMM USA I AD-CRYSTAL BAY IMPRO I L.S. RENOVATION AD 0359-4323 0569-4323 CPC035892 CPC036056 OH OH 032537 1995/02/13 $281.25 $281.25* SPRING PARK CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002394 OH 032538 1995/02/13 $21.45 $21.45* STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL C039-4240 002356 OH • • • COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995/02/13 00:35:50 VENDORSTEWART, ROBYN DESCRIPTION REFUND LICENSE FEE-S ACCOUNT tt 9001-3119 mm*INVOICE -•••--••••••it•*Page 11 PO NUM. MANUAL002349OH99811.2 OH15177.1 OH13906.1 OH 14790.1 OH 15926.2 OH 15926.1 OH 15233.1 OH 002406 OH 002347 OH 002367 OH 002367 OH 002409 OH 002379 OH 002353 OH 40-76691-11 OH 002352 OH 002408 OH 002408 OH 002400 OH 002400 OH 002408 OH 002408 OH 002408 OH 002408 OH 7629 OH 81947 OH 82009 OH 032539 032540 032541 032542 032543 032544 032545 032546 032547 032548 032549 1995/02/131995/02/131995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $25.00$25.00*$30.35$44.46$10.60 $63.75 $19.60 $38.13 $51.12 $258.01* $18.00 $18.OC* $855.00 $855.00* $433.72 $530.11 $963.83* $374.36 $374.36* $30.00 $30.00* $23.78 $254.53 $288.12 $566.43* 208.66 249.66 55.58 28.95 $55.58 12.40 53.24 $372.20 $1,036.27* I: $ I $246.76 $246.76^ $173.29 $14.10 $107.39* STRETCHERSSTREICHERSSTREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS SULLIVAN, STEPHEN SUTHERLANDS TOWN & COUNTRY TOWN & COUNTRY 2 MAG MODEL 92 L HOL 9MM MAG,FLASHLIGHT B FLASHLIGHT REPAIR #5 SIREN REPAIR #169 REPAIR FLASHLIGHT FLASHLIGHT BULBS & R PBJ MOUTHPIECES BAL DUE lACP CONF TREE REMOVAL-FOX ST FEB SERVICE FEB SERVICE TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR POLICE GARAGE UNITED WAY US WEST CELLULAR INC US WEST CELLULAR INC US WEST CELLULAR INC CHARITY 0750000E CELL PHONE-POLICE CELLULAR PHONE-POLIC CELL PHONE-CHESWICK US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS VESSCO INC VILLAGE CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET CHLORINATOR OVERHAUL EXHAUST WORK #422 EXHAUST WORK #422 012901290129 0129 0129 0129 0129 422142214232 4341 4232 4232 4232 0129-4356 0249-4346 0129-4349 0099-4349 0129-4343 9999-2030 0129-4320 0129-4560 0129-4320 0590 0129 0175 0569 0549 0549 0590 0099 4320 4320 4320 4320 4320 4320 4320 4320 0549-4345 0249-4232 0249-4232 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Feb 10 1995 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995^2/13 00:35:50032550032551$1,651.00$1,651.00*1995/02/13 $99.05$99.05* 032552 032553 032554 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $1.45$8.59 $10.04* 1995/02/13 1995/02/13 $12.51 $12.51* $8.12 $8.12* $272,726.53 \ H HENNEPIN HUMAN SER WARNING LITES OP MNWECKMAN STEPHEN WECKMAN STEPHEN WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT it INVOICE Page 12 PO NUM. MANUAL1995 CONTRIBUTION 0100-4385BARRICADE RENTAL 0249-4331 68610 OHMILEAGE REIMS SEMINAR MILEAGE St PA 0174-43810174-4356 002343002343 OHOH WINDOW REPAIR 0590-4343 5889 OH SECURITY LIGHT 0249-4324 002355 OH » • ^ «COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Fri Feb 10 1995 00:36:00 Page 1 ,FUND n 001 GENERAL FUND $196,952.91FUNDn115BLDG CAP O/L FD $3,414.95FUND423MUN ST AID CO/FD $3,328.71FUND#424 PERM IMP REV FD $988.27FUNDII672WTR OPERATING FD $7,621.52 FUND it 673 SWR OPERATING FD $29,337.80 FUND it 674 G/C OPERATING FD $3,982.93 FUND #999 PAYROLL CLEARING $27,099.44 $272,726.53 information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEEHNG FEB 1 3 1995 CITYOFORONO OF TO: FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:February 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Highway 12 Improvement Project - Signal Agreement As pan of the Highway 12 improvement project scheduled for construction in 1995, a semaphore will be constructed at the intersection ot Highway 12 and Willow Drive. Because the semaphore will be at an intersection of a City street, the cities are involved in a cost sharing of the construction as well as ongoing maintenance of pans of the semaphore. Attached for review only at this time is a standard agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and the Cities of Orono and Long Lake. The City of Long Lake is involved because the south side of the intersection is in Long Lake and the north side is in Orono. The control panel for the signal will be in Orono; therefore Orono will bill Long Lake for one- half of the electric costs, bulb replacement, painting of the signal, cabinet and luminary mast arm extension. This agreement is similar to the agreement we have with Mn/DOT for the signals at Old Crystal Bay Road and at County Road 6. This agreement is presented for review only at this time. MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 73012 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF ORONO AND THE CITY OF LONG LAKE Remove the existing Hazard Identification Beacon and Install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive; and Install Interconnect on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) from Old Crystal Bay Road to County State Aid Highway No. 146 (South Brown Road) - Lake Street in Orono and Long Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2713-64 S.A.P. 152-101-10 F.P. NH 010-2 (95) Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE City of Orono $41,185.00 Oitv of Long Lake S 7.997.40 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED _ _ _ _ _None_ _ _ _ Otherwise Covered THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the City of Orono, hereinafter referred to as "Orono"; and the City of Long Lake, hereinafter referred to as "Long Lake", WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, the State had determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive; and install interconnect on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) from Old Crystal Bay Road to County State Aid Highway No. 146 (South Brown Road) - Lake Street; and WHEREAS, Orono and Long Lake requests and the State agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System", as a part of the new traffic control signal installation on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and 73012 -1- WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a master controller and a new cabinet and control equipment to operate the new traffic control signal; and WHEREAS, because the population of Long Lake is less than 5,000, the State shall therefore pick up 80 percent of Long Lake's share of the new traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System and signing, and the interconnect work provided for herein; and WHEREAS, Orono, Long Lake and the State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the new traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System and signing, and the interconnect as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS; 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal which shall constitute “Preliminary Engineering". The State shall also perform the construction inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service pole or pad, shall 73012 -2- constitute the actusl "Constnjction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall perform the traffic control signal work provided for under State Project No. 2713-64, State Aid Project No. 152-101-10 and Federal Aid Project No. NH 010-2(95) with the Construction Costs stated as follows: a. Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive. Remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System and signing. Estimated Construction Cost is $118,500.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 50 percent. Orono's share is 25 percent. Long Lake's share is 25 percent (State's portion is 80% of this 25 percent. City's portion is 20% of this 25 percent.). b. Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) from Old Crystal Bay Road to County State Aid Highway No. 146 (South Brown Road) - Lake Street. Install interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is $37,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 57 percent. Orono's share is 73012 -3- 23 percent. Long Lake's share is 20 percent (State's portion is 80% of this 20 percent. City's portion is 20% of this 20 percent.). 4. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, Orono and Long Lake shall each advance to the State an amoxint equal to their portion of the project costs. Orono's and Long Lake's total portion shall consist of the sum of the following: a) Orono's and Long Lake's respective share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State furnished materials costs. b) Eight (8) percent of each respective share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 5. Upon completion and final acceptance of the project, Orono's and Long Lake's final share shall consist of the sum of the following: a) Orono's and Long Lake's respective share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the final payment to the Contractor and the actual State furnished materials costs. b) Eight (8) percent of each respective final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 73012 -4- The amount of the funds advanced by Orono and Long Lake in excess of Orono's and Long Lake's final share will be returned to Orono and Long Lake without interest and Orono and Long Lake agree to pay to the State that amount of their final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by Orono and Long Lake. 6. Orono shall be responsible for the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and for providing the necessary electrical power for the operation of the new traffic control signal with street lights installation. Orono shall receive the bill for the installation of the electrical power supply and the monthly electrical bill for the new traffic control signal with street lights, and invoice Long Lake for 50 percent of the costs. 7. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be Orono's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. Orono shall invoice Long Lake for 50 percent of the costs of the above mentioned maintenance responsibilities assigned to Orono. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the signing 73012 -5- 1 , . ^ r^®■rfftr-n all other new traffic controland interconnect, and perrorm axx signal and street light maintenance. 8. The EVP System provided for in Paragraph 3 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a. All maintenance of the EVP System shall be b. c. done by State forces. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, subdivision 5 and 169.03. Orono and Long Lake will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units. Orono and Long Lake shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time the traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System and that said logs shall be made available to the State upon request. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the State immediately. 73012 -6- I d. In the event said EVP System or components aj^e, in the opinion of the State, hein^ misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by Orono or Long Lake of written notxce thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receiver, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components e. shall become the property of the State All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. 9. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of Orono or Long Lake and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any fourth party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of Orono or Long Lake. The State shall not be 73012 -7- 1 responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of Orono or Long Lake. 10. All timing of the new traffic control signal provided fcr herein shall be determined by the State» through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 11. Upon execution by Orono, Long Lake and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement shall supersede and terminate Agreement No. 65149M, dated January 12, 1989, between Orono and the State. 73012 -8- rTTV OF ORONO APPROVED AS TO FORM; City Attorney By Mayor (City Seal) City Administrator CITY OF LONG LAKE APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor (City Seal) City Cler)c-Treasurer 73012 -9- STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Assistant Division Engineer Operations Division Assistamt Commissioner Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota Dated DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Dated 73012 -10- RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Orono enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: •po remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive; and install interconnect on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) from Old Crystal Bay Road to County State Aid Highway No. 146 (South Brown Road) - Lake Street in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 73012, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Orono I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Orono at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the _ _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1995, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk (Seal) resolution BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Long Lake enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing hazard identification beacon and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wnyzata Boulevard) at Willow Drive; and install interconnect on Trunk Highway No. 12 (Wa/zata Boulevard) f r :?m Old Crystal Bay Road to County State Aid Highway No. 146 (South Brown Road) - Lake Street in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 73012, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION state of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Long Lako I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Long Lake at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the _ _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1995, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk-Treasurer (Seal) Penny Steele COMMISSIONER .<**•*. if PHONE 612 34B-75^7 FAX 612 34« 8701 TDD 612 348-7708 Board of Hennepin County Commissioners A-2400 Govt :rnment Centfr Minneapolis , Minnesota 55487-0240 January 27, 1995 Honorable Edward Callahan, Jr. Mayor, City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan: Recently my secretary contacted your office to obtain your city council meeting schedule, agenda information and to offer any support my office can give your city. Thanks for the cooperation and assistance given by vour city administrator. As requested, I would appreciate receiving a copy of your council agenda prior to your meetings, particularly if there is any item on your agenda that affects Hennepin County. This can be faxed to my attention at 348-8701, or mailed to me at the address shown above. I also have asked my staff to FAX a copy of the Hennepin County Board Meeting Agenda to your office when there is an agenda item of particular interest to your township. My plan in the future is to attend one of your City Council meetings to meet you and the City Council Members. My office will let you know when I will be coming. I will be happy to answer any questions or take care of any concerns that you may have. lam enclosing my card, along with the card of my aide, Margaret Littrell. Feel free to contact either one of us. I look forward to serving your needs and the needs of the citizens of Hennepin County. Sincerely, Penny Steele County Commissioner Enclosures c: Ronald Moorse Orono City Administrator PRINTED ON REG I'CLED PAPER ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 17,1995 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the foDowing members presem. Chair Charles Schrocder, Stephen Peterson, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Candace Rowlettc, Charles Nolan. Jr., and Janice Berg. Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Recorder Sherry Frost represented Staff. Chair Schroeder cafled the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING/PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING (#1) 7:30 P.M. #1990 ROBERT W. CARLSON, 710 GANDER ROAD - VACATION OF EASEMENT - 8:05-8:08 P.M. Mr. Carlson was not present. No member of the public had any conunents. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Item #1990. Ayes 7, Nays 0. ACTION ITEMS (#2) #1975 LARRY ANHALT, 2190 WAYZATA BLVD. - APPEALS - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00-8:05 P.M. The Applicant was present. Mabusth said this application has been taken in as an appeal because of the many land use issues that must be resolved before a formal application can be filed. The plan calls for a commercial use of Outlot E, Sugar Woods, in B1 zoning district. The Planning Commission is asked to determine if the proposed use is consistent with intent of B-1 code for a "garage* use. There is also the issue of a partiaily platted east/west road to the north of the property, and City’s plan to seek a final access to east at North Brown Road. The conceptual site plan consists of a showroom, an office area, garage, and car wash. One third of the structure will be for office and showroom use with the remainder for the and car wash. Ihe applicant advised the showroom will house such items as tires, exhaust systems, and brake systems One major issue involves a conflict with plat maps presented with information. The right- of-way issue needs to be solved. Staff provided an exhibit depicting the various options for right-of-way dedications. The City Engineer and Mn/DOT say that a C/D line is being sought in the 1995 improvements. The plat map for the County shows the right-of-way as an E/F line. According to Dennis Hill of the County's Property Description Office, we should go with the right-of-way we depicted by the C/D line in lieu of that shown on the current County plat map. Hwy 12 at this location will have a median in the center probably a turn to left or cast. The median is part of the 1995 safety improvements. MINinrES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 {HI - #1975 Larry Anhalt - Continued) The northenr 55* of the property must be rezoned from RR-IB to B-1 consistent with directives of Sugar Woods plat. The commission discussed the need to plat the remainder of the east/west road which they advised should be platted as part of this application The road will run from the Otten property at the west and through Anhalt's property, eventually to Brown Road. The road will be installed based on demands for future development. The Sugar Woods covenants say that at the time the common corridor is to be platted that the road will be designated. It was noted that because applicant has been asked to dedicate additional right-of-way for 1995 Hwy 12 improvements, Mn/DOT has approved a single curb cut to property. The land owner, Sid Rebers, along with his legal representative, Greg Poe, were presCTt. Rebers originally owned 41 acres from Sugar Woods to Hwy 12. Poe discussed why it was his opinion that the east/west. Brown to Willow Road, connection is not functional Cliff Otten was also present. The easement goes through the Otten property into the Reber property. It was important to note that easements now exist from Willow Road over Outlot D within ^plicant's property and does not e.xtend any further into Outlot F. This would have to be asked for as part of the application process Outlot D was created as part of the future road. Any development of the property east of the Wear property would trigger construction of the road. The first is^te to be resolved would be in the proposed use permitted under the B-l code. Anhalt's business. Pro Tire and Exhaust, is a retail/installation operation involving what he called quick items, tires, shocks, struts, exhaust, alignments, and oil chaiiges. The plan is for a garage consisting of four, east facing bays and a car wash for his clientele, not for the general public. The location would provide good exposure being located on H^ 12. It should be noted that the site allows adequate room to move the proposed building to the rear as Mn/DOT is taking additional land fur right-of-way. Anhalt is asking for clarification from the Planning Commission on the zoning issue in order to proceed with site planning. Mabusth reviewed the intent of the B1 sales distnet that encourages commodities or services for the surrounding ndghborhood and may adjoin a residential area. It must be serviced by municipal water and sewer, and direct highway access is needed. The garage use is listed under the conditional use section of the code and includes repair of cars, which must be totally enclosed. The rear and front setback requirements present no problem. There are recent Mn/DOT changes to Hwy 12 that the City and Applicant will need to review for this application. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#2 - #1975 Lany Anhalt - Continued) The Planning Commissioners voiced their approval of this land use saying h was consistem with the City's comprehensive plaa Nolan brought up the number of parking stalls needed for this usage. Mabusih said this would be studied as part of the conditional use permit process. Neighbor, Bill Wear, of 2160 Wayzata Blvd., said he was concerned with the curb cut. He feels it is too close to his property and should be relocated. Otherwise, he finds the application to be satisfactory Clitf Otten, the property owner to the immediate west noted his support and approval of the application. Peterson moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application # 1975, with the finding that the applicant complies with the Bl zoning code and amendment two of the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant must come back before the commission with a formal conditional use permit and commercial site plan; rezoning and subdivision application. The commission reaffirmed for applicam that the City will exoect the designation of a future connection road to North Brown Road at the time of the platting of Outlot F. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#3) #1981 TODD R. COURNEYA, 4620 TONKA VIEW LANE - VARUNCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 8:08-8:20 P.M. The Applicant was present. Mabusth said the Applicant has come back with a new plan which does not encroach the bluff area The proposed house has been downsized, and the garage has been relocated to the west side and reduced to two stalls. The proposed house will be located 25’ from the street lot line v/here 35' is required. The setback from the existing traveled road wrill be 46' and at 42' if Tonkaview Road is upgraded at 28' width, as proposed by the City Engineer. The setback from the 10' grassed boulevard of the upgraded road is 32' from the north side, where 35' is required. Peterson, who was one of three commissioners who reviewed this application at the last meeting, recalled that if a variance was to be needed, preference was to the street side and not to the bluff* area side. A main concern was with the drainage for the proposed plan. Rowiettte was concerned that no water goes down the hill on the site. Nolan said a landscape stabilization plan would be needed along with a drainage plan designed by a professional engineer. Smith is concerned with the patio and the placement of the building over the smaller hill. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#3 - 1M981 Todd R. Coumeya - Continued) Nolan moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #1981 sul^ect to review and acceptance by the City of a professional drainage plan, a comprehensive landscape stabilization plan, as well as an erosion control plan requiring periodic inspections by the City Engineer Ayes 6, Nays I. Smith. Smith ’s opinion is that the plan should move the house away from the smaller hill. (#4) #1986 DAVID YORKS, 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:20-8:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mrs. Yorks was present. Schroeder read a letter addressed to the City from Dave Stockdale of Edgework Builders, the contractor for the application, to be included as part of the public record, rtipulating confirmation that proper construction procedures were followed for the retaining wall as required by the City. Mabusth said the application was an emergency situation that developed after the November Planning Commission meeting requiring the City to make a decision without first coming before the Commission and Council for approval. It was discovered that the retaining wall at the top of the bank leading to the lake was in a near state of coU^se and measures needed to be taken immediately to safeguard bank before spring thaw and rains. The contractor failed to call for inspections during the reconstruction of walls, although, contractor did work with the City Engineer on the project. Since inspections would not confirm that the wall had been installed as required, the Engineer asked that a letter be submitted for the record. There were no public comments. Rowlette felt there should be no after-the-fact penalty due to the circumstances. Rowlette, moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #1986 for an after-the-fart conditional use permit and setback variance for retaining wall with the recommendation that no penalty be assessed. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #1987 LARRY PH.LAR, 2705 ETHEL AVENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:30-8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#5 - #1987 Lany Pillar - Continued) The AppGcant was present Mabusth reported that the application involves a 10\15' addition to the rear of a home that was installed without a building permit The applicant’s intention was to repar sections of the foundation of the three-season porch, which also provides an interior access to the basemem area, and found he needed to replace foundations, the wood frame walls and roof The addition was rebuilt within the original envelope Applicant advised that he has been working on this project for a fiew months. The inspectors issued a stop work order, and applicant was advised of the need for a building permit and survey The survey revealed the porch w^ 47" from the side lot line The house is 4 ’ from said line. There is a 14’ unimproved alley which separates applicant’s from the property to the north If the alleyway was vacated, this property would receive the benefit of the eventual 14’ wide alley. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #1987 to include a penalty fee for not having acquired a building permit and that addition be completed within 90 days. Ayes 7, Nays 0. It was noted that the shed on the property was not found on the survey and b located on the property line. The vacating of the alley would solve this problem. (#6) #1988 KENNETH J, SEVERINSON» 2800 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:40-8:50 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted The Applicant was present Mabusth reported that the application is for a setback va ance required for rcinstallation of new sections, 6-T in height, of a privacy fence adjacent to the southwest channel side and street side of the property. The original fence continued approximately 8'farther along the channel than the new fence The Applicant said he was unaware of the for a permit. It was discovered after 78% of the fence had been replaced. The fence b in the 0-75’ zone and is not considered hardcover. The Applicant said the noise level of the area without the privacy fence is very Itmd and b part of his hardship statement. Peterson and Smith were concerned with approving a fence here and setting a precedent for others to follow as a reason to g:>‘ant a future request for fencing. There were no public comments. I minutes of the orono planning commission MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#6 - #1988 Kenneth J. Severinson - Continued) Schrocder moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #1988 for reconstruction of the fence due to the hardships listed. Ayes 5, Nays 2, Peterson, Siiuth Peterson said he would have liked to have seen a lower fence with shrubs to be consistent with other channel properties. Smith concurred. (#7) #1989 WILLIAM STODDARD, 2805 KELLY AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:50-9:20 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicam was present. A letter from the Applicant to Orono officials was read to be added as part of the public record. It was noted that permits had been received from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Department of the Array/Corps of Engineers for the installation of the proposed pond Stoddard had been in communication with the City over street flooding matters and wrongly assumed he had satisfied City requirements. This application is a land-use submission for a pond for water retention to aid with the flooding that occurs in Kelly Avenue. Mabusth said the property has a low area approximately 80’x90’ in which the Applicant would like to build a 60'x60’ pond. Landscaping would also involve the placement of large rocks around the pond. The plan also includes the reseeding of all distrubed areas to more suitable vegetation. The Applicant would also like to reaUgn his driveway due to the street flood'uig and is working with Public Works Director Gerhardson on ^s matter. The City Engineer recommended against large benn or rocks being placed in the unimproved rit^t-of-way. Mabusth noted that this land is not a designated or protected wetland but a low retention area. This project will not impact the storm water plan and will have a minimal effect on retention during flooding. It was noted that the 550-600 yards of soil material being removed is now being stockpiled but will be moved and trucked out by the contractor. Berg reported having received complaints over the depth of the pond. It was clarified that the pond will gradually deepen to approximately 6’ to 8'. It was noted that eight neighbors have signed letters giving their approval of the pond as long as the pond conforms to regulations stipulated by the MCWD, Corps of Engineers, and the City of Orono. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#7 - #1989 William Stoddard - Continued) Neighbor, Clair Rood, asked how the pond would alleviate flooding of Kelly Avenue. Mabusth said that it would not solve Kelly Avenue flooding and would provide only a temporary respite for the water, would not add to the flooding problem, nor would it impact any future storm sewers. Peterson moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #1989 for a conditional use permit for a 60'x60' area to be upgraded to a type 3 wetland similiar to the pond developed for a property located at Orono Orchard Road The surrounding area will need to remain natural, with cattails, and no mowing near the pond. The Applicant must work with the Staff on a vegetation plan. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#8) #1991 CLAIR ROOD, 2525 SHADYWOOD ROAD - COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:25-10:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. This application is for a proposed office building on the west side of Shadywood Road on lot 1 of Leach Addition Subdivision A comprehensive plan is included for lot 2 of Leach Addition for another office building, both projects located whhin the B4 zoning district, and a duplex in the LR-IB zone. The subdivision was approved in 1978 with a 24' acce» and utility easement to serve residential lot along northwest lot line of lot 1 Mabusth said the property was the subject of a review in 1980 for an office building, which never transpired. The Applicant is proposing a I25'x42' single story office building with a south-facing walkout. Mabusth noted that the parking stalls on the plan were not sufficient for the maximum use potential that a building of this size would demand. Although the Applicant's plan for the lower level involves storage only, the City looks at what the potential use could be in the future for determining paring stalls. If the building were a single story only, the number of stalls would satisfy City ordinances. The plans shows 25, 9*x 18', stalls. The code calls for staOs at 9'x20’. This is a sensitive area where drainage is concerned. There is a 12" culvert which drains to the southeast to Lafayette Marsh subdivision. Plans for this site must include drainage calculations for determining runoff that will leave site at developed level A retention area must also be included on this she. it should be noted that hardcover is less than 35% \vhhin the 500 to 1000' zone. Ordinance Section 10.56 allows for hardcover controls for properties located in commercial zones. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#8 - #1991 Clair Rood - Continued) Commission concerns involve the use of hardcover with pavement w.ihin 20 ‘ of the front and with drainage going to the front The duplex is proposed to share the driveway with the commercial use which is not allowed. The parking stalls also cannot back up onto the roadway as proposed. The 24* roadway easement is presently located on the north side of the property in question. The Applicant is planning on moving this easement to the center to run between two commercial buildings and down to the proposed duplex. Commission membei^ suggested that the applicant consider moving the building setting fo*- aesthetic reasons as the back of the proposed building is presently exposed to CoRd 19. Another suggestion was combining the two lots and having one ofiSce building. The Applicant anticipates a possible lease with a real estate oflBcc for the one building Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to tabic this Application to allow the Applicant to work with Staff on solving the problems of parking stalls, road egress, and water drainage and retention. Ayes 7, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 12,1994 Smith distributed her report of the Council meeting to the members of the commission. (#10) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Mabusth reported that the Council has reviewed the B-2 Ordinance Proposed Amendment and submitted their changes. Council will again review the ordinance at their meetii^ of January 23, 1995. The Planning Commission has a meeting Friday morning, 1/20/95, on the proposed Westonka Intervention Project shelter. The Planning Commission meeting in February has been changed to Wednesday, 2/22/95. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (#11) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 21, 1994 MEETING Peterson moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 21, 1994. Ayes 6, Nays 0. Smith was not present during the motion. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#12) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE FEBRUARY 13,1995 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Rowiettc will attend the February 13, 1995 meeting of the Council. ADJOURNMENT Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to adjourn at 10:20 p.m. Charles Schroeder, Chair Person JIM RAMSTAD THIRD DISTRICT. MINNESOTA JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE January 23, 1995 of i\)t ^ntteb &tates^ Jaasfjington, 5©€ 20515-2303 wa »mni KSTO«i OPfiCf 322 C*NNO«i Houtf Omici tuikOMM Wasminotom CC 20515-2303 (2021 225-2571 DltTHtCT or*ict 1120 PIWM Avinui Soutm . #152 B loomiwotow. MN 55431 (612) 581-4600 Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Dorothy: 199TS- scheduled date of April 12, 1995. The town meeting will actually start at 7 p.m. and conclude at 8 p.m., but we would like the use of the chambers for three hours to allow for an efficient amount of set-up and clean-up time. A staff member from my office will pick up a key on the 18th, before 4:30 p.m. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Shari Nichols in my Bloomington office at 881-4600. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, STAD ber of Congress JR:sn r JAN 2 6 1995 c;. POINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUgATIOH a 1995 OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. jW ‘ HELD ON JANUARY 10, 1995 The regular neeting of the Board of Education of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on January 10, 1995. The neeting was held in the Orono Village Hall which will now be the regular neeting place for the Board of Education. Present: Janes Franklin Martha Van de Ven Peg Swanson Jack Veach Absent: Panela Schroeder Thonas Mich Neal Lawson John Maresh arrived while the neeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Jack Veach, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the ninutes of the Decenber 6, 1994 regular neeting; - approved the ninutes of the Decenber 15, 1994 special neeting; • accepted the resignation of Phyll5s Fritz, paraprofessional at Schunann Elementary School effective December 23, 1994; - approved the Treasurer's Reports for November and December, 1994; > approved the bills as covered by vouchers 085411 through 085871 and office checks as covered by vouchers 4862 through 4972. Motion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Dr. Mich stated that he had sent a letter to Mayor Callahan expressing appreciation to him, the City Council and the Orono staff for their hospitality/graciousness to the School District as the transition is made for holding the Board of Education meetings in their meeting hall. Dr. Mich reported that the semester break is January 20 and that this is the time when the District recognizes its long-time employees at a luncheon at the high school and the Board members are invited to attend; that on January 18, 19 and 20 the annual MSBA convention will be held at the Convention Center in Minneapolis and he encouraged Board members to focus on exhibits of architects; that he wanted to remind the Board that Mary Endorf and Connie Fladeland hold coffee times for parents and if the Board is aware of people who would like to attend one of these sessions, please contact Mary or Connie; that Pam Henjum will attend a meeting on January 17 sponsored by AMSD and NSPRA for the purpose of obtaining information regarding the upcoming legislative session; that on February 3 the Boara will meet with area legislators for a continental breakfast and discussion regarding the upcoming legislative session. Dr. Mich stated that a Cocurricular Council will be developed to review/study equity in athletics and other cocurricular areas and also the Board policy that relates to this area of concern. He stated that the Council will be comprised of Dr. Carl Shutts and Steve Fedie as exofficio members of the Council, three coaches or advisors, three students selected by the Student Council, three parents selected by the Booster groups, and John Maresh will represent the Board. This group will stay intact as an advisory to the athletic program and meetings will be held at least once during each season of sports and will make recommendations to administration. He stated that the Council will be formulated within three weeks and after preliminary work has been completed, the Board will formally approve the Council as a continuing committee of the District. Some parents were present at the Board meeting, and during community members questions and comments, they expressed concern regarding the athletic program. Dr. Mich and Board members responded to these parents and answered questions regarding this issue. Chairman Franklin stated that, with the consensus of the Board, they would move to Agenda Item F3, a report from Mr. Mark Mallander of AMSD. Mr. Mark Mallander, Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan School Districts, provided the Board with a brief preview of the upcoming legislative session and the work that AMSD is doing on behalf of our School District. Mr. Mallander answered questions from the Board for clarification purposes. Dr. Mich and Board members expressed appreciation to Mr. Mallander for his informative report and for the hard work that he does for the AMSD member districts. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Jack Veach, the Board of Education approved the attached Policies and Regulations, 7101, 7101.3 and 7301 as revised and deletion of 7301.1, 7302, 7302.1, 7302.2 and 7601. This was a second reading and was approved as presented. Board member Martha Van de Ven reported on the progress of the Facilities Council. She stated that the Council is scheduled to visit various school districts within the next week or so and Board members are invited to attend any of the visitations that have been scheduled and she provided the dates for them. If Board members can attend they should call the administrator for a complete schedule. The Board received, in their packets. Policy #2103 as a first reading. The policy establishes regular Board of Education neetings, dates and tine. This policy will be brought back to the Board for a second reading on January 24, 1995. The Board noved to Agenda Item F2, the transportation fund lobbying effort. UPON NOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Peg Swanson, the Board of Education approved that the Orono School District would cooperate with neighboring school districts to engage a lobbyist for the purpose of getting relief from the financial "cap" on the transportation formula. The purpose of this motion is to participate with other school districts in order to hire a lobbyist for a more consolidated campaign to get relief from the transportation formula cap. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Peg Swanson, seconded by Jack Veach, the Board of Education auithorized Ehlers and Associates, Inc. to solicit proposals for the sale of $3,305,000 General Obligation Tax Andicipation Certificates and report the results to this Board for consideration at the meeting of February 14, 1995. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, t^>^or‘Jed by Jack Veach, the Board of Education approved the attached resolution authorizing participation in the State's Credit Enhancement Program for the General Obligation Tax Anticipation Certificates. RESOLUTION COVENANTINO AND OBLIGATING THE DISTRICT TO BE BOUND BY AND TO USE THE PROVISIONS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 124.755, TO GUARANTEE THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL and interest of the CERTinCATES BE nr RESOLVED by the School Board of independent School District No. 271, State of Minnesota, as follows: 1, r..ia«ntee Program (a) The District hereby covenants and obligates itself to notiQr the Commissioner of Education of a potential default in the payment of principal and inter^ on its Gene^ Obligation Tax Anticipation Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1995 (the "Certificates ) and to use ^ provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 124.755. to guarantee payment of the principal and interest on the Certificaies when due. The District further covenants to deposit with the Registiaf or any »»cc^ paying agent three (3) days prior to the date on which a payment is due an amount suffici^ to make that payment or to notify the Commission of Education that it will be unable to make all w a portkm o^payrnent. T^ Registrar for the Certif cates or any successor paying agent it autborued and oncted to n^ the Commissioner of Educatioo if it becomes aware of a potential deftuh in the payment of pnncipd ^ mter^ on the Certificates or if. on the day two (2) business days prior to the d^ a p^ent Certificates, there are insufficient funds to make that payment on deposit with the Registm. The District understands that as a result of its covenant to be bound by the provisions of Minnesoto Statutes, Section 124.755, the provision of that section shall be binding as long as anyCertificates of this issue remain outstanding. (b) The District further covenants to comply with all procedures now or hereafter established by the Departments of Finance and EducaUon of the Stote of Minnesota pursuant to MiiuKWta Stotutes, Section 124.755, subdivision 2(c) and otherwise to take such actions as necessary to comply with that section. 2. Certificate. If this resolution is adopted, the following language shall be inserted on the reverse of each Certificate. The issuer has covenanted and obligated itself to be bound by the provisions of Minnesota Section 124.755. and 10 use the provision of Ihtl suiutt » goinntee Ihe payment of the principal and interest on the Certificates when due. r Motion carried. Dr. Shutts, Orono High School Principal, presented the 1995-96 registration guide and highlighted the changes that have been incorporated, one of those being to increase the number of credits required for graduation from 20 credits to 24 credits. He stated that this recommendation was prepared with input from representative faculty, students and parents and he provided information on the circumstances that led to the development of the proposed change. Dr. Shutts answered questions from the Board. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, the Board of Education approved the 1995-96 registration guide, including proposed graduation requirements, as presented. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Peg Swanson, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. the ames Franklin, Chairman 0John Maresh, Clerk CITY OF ORUNO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1995 7:15 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ATTENDANCE AGENDA 1. Approval of Minutes January 3, 1995 2. Crystal Ba> Park. 3. French Creek Preserve - Message Board. Highwood Nature Trail. Skating Rink - Progress Report 6. Golf Course - Progress Report. 7. Park Commission Action Plan. 8. Canoe Rack. 9. Adopt a Park Brochure. 10. 1995 Calendar Revised. 11. Local Grants Information. 12. Other Business. ADJOURNMENT ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MLNUTES FOR JANUARY 3,1995 DRAFT ATTE^^DANCE The Park Commisaon met on the above date with the following members present: Susan WUson, LUi McMillan, Sherokec Dse, and James \Miite, who arrived at 7:35 p m. Richard Flint and Robert Howells were absent. Public Works Director, John Gerhardson, and Recorder, Sherry Frost, represented Staff. Acting Chair Susan Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:25 p.m. (#1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 5, 1994 The follo>ving cotiections were made lo the December 5. 1994 minutes: Wilson sdd to make sure that the 'Open Space Inventory” memo be attached to the runutes^ McMillan asked that it be noted that a copy be sent to the Park Commissioners m regard to the recruitment letter being drafted by Gerhardson under item K. Wdson a^ed for clarification of the reference Flint made of the public-minded citizens tn Orono under item #4 on pg 3 of the draft. This was in response to a news article of a large publtc donauon made for a park in Wayzata McMillan made the cotreaion of the grant referred to on pg 8 of the draft as the ISTEA gram. The open times were corrected under Item #6, under the Wimer Recreation Program at Orono GolfCourse, as being fi’om 12-4 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. Gerhardson remarked that the Orono park volunteers in 1994 have agreed to continue to assist in 1995. Letters will now be sent to organizations for additional volumeers for this coming year. It was suggested that the parks be listed along with the names of the volunteers who have adopted each park. Wilson suggerted that calls be made to people the commissioners feel would be interested in assisting in this area. Use asked that t e letter define the commitment made by the volunteers as being for one year or one season and list what parks need adopting. Gerhardson will bring the letter to the meeting in Fd>ruary. Dse and McMillan will advertise the winter recreation program available at the golf course in the Pioneer newspaper after reviewal with Gerhardson. McMillan made note of the need to establish a firad for park solicitations fi^om the citizens. Concern was made over the future loss of park fee funding. White moved. Use seconded, to approve the Minutes of the December 5, 1994 Park Commission Meeting as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. minutes of the regular orono park commission S^ING HELD ON JANIJARY 3. 1995 draft («) RESIGNATION VICE CHAIR ALEX VONGRIES v^uable persp^ve .ha.Xngs to .he commission. The other comnuss,oners agreed, ^rhar^n^dldr^ar—^ “ S “wiison said .he Comndssioners should suggest .o possible candidates that they apply for the vacancy. (M) SAGA HILI. '5PEN SPACE PRESERVATION open l^d in Saga HlUs. The group is considenng proposing a bond referendu preserving open l^d in Orono. Wilson me. wid. \Uchael Gaflron and discussed *« open put together maps and data of the open space and has noted open tod more *Gaffion divided Orono into three segments, northwest, northeast . Tlootog over Ute northwest section, Wilson said to notice the Panuska arrf Snibte oronertiK as worth looking at for fiiture park space In the northeasL two large opra tod soa^^ere noted Bruce Dayton owns 140 acres, which he ts ^poMg for a pond. OTeenhousc and trails The 107 acres known as Spring Hill was brought to the S^n^an^onalso. In the south area, Wilson made refa^ to “ a tree farm bordering French Creek Preserve and 14 acr« north were a few areas that Gaflron and Wilson felt the com^nera should look at and consider as maintaining as open space for fiiture park-like development. Wilson said the park commissioners need to set criteria of what the what should be done and how the open space inventory fits into this plan, flse also suegested looking at other cities and their park plans. The conunissioners noted that the action agenda for 1995 included uef i-ing the ^ ^ open space portion of the 1980 Orono Community Management ■•laii. -^,7* “ . btoli was s^gested for Thursday, February 23, 1995,6:30-8:30 p i.i Vt dson ^ conler with Flint and Howells as to their availability on this date. Gerhardson will see t members have a copy of the open space maps developed by Gaflron. (#3 - Open Spsce Preservation ■ Continued) It was detenmiied that each Commissioner member will prioritize wlut b impottam to them for (uture park deveioproem and come to the work session equipped with they see as a picture for tomorrow fun White offered to provide materials which would help facilitate the planning for this session. (#4) CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGROUND Gerhardson passed out a rough plan for the Crystal Bay Playground for the commissioners input. The Commissioners discussed the pros and cons of the plan. McMillan and Wilson vrifl set up a meeting of the sub-committee to go over the plan and make sugg^t.ons for changes and rearrangement. Gerhardson noted the importance of the City s obligation m following the ADA guidelines for accessibility for those with disabilities. Some comments of the plans are as follows: Concern over the small size of the parking lot; need for an open rectangular grass area for casual games; hi^ cost of tennis rourts, movinkt the ice rink to where the voUeyball court is located; ambiance o^c gazebo; positive response to the landscape beims and the sidewalk to the post office; whether both fencing and berms are necessary; and the need to look at rough cost estimates for downsizing as the plan is rather busy. (#5) OTHER BUSINESS Highwood Nature Trail was discussed. Gerhardson passed out a plan for this park ^ had been made in 1970 and noted how it closely foUows what is being suggested today. The location for the parking lot has been determined to be placed along the county road. Gerhardson has suegested a loop driveway which will allow for a smaller lot but still accomodate a bus.''The estimated cost is $5,000. Bituminous is suggested due to the lower maintenance fector but can be sealcoated with colored rock. Tlie trailhead sign and picnic table will cost approximately $1,000. Gerhardson said the City needs to consider development of a pond for storm water runoff. This would be paid for with funding other than Paric Dedication Funds. McMillan moved. Use seconded, to submit a budget proposal to the Council for ^ parking lot for Highwood Trail, which could accomodate a bus, and for signage and picnic table for spring completion. Gerhardson to provide final details prior to Council meeting. Ayes 4, Nays 0. The commission will be looking for an adopt-a-park group to maintain the trails in this area. draft (#5 - Other Business - Continued) bang uL. The rinks are cunently scheduled for flooding 2-3 times a week. nse repo^ thm Uie ^ m'?l^PoinfLks good but a light is currently out Antoine is the ^ rtok. Tn^^so Juried that a piL ofeqmpment had been thrown down a tall at the golf course. The golf course clubhouse is opening on Saturday. 1/7. weather permitting. More snow is Z^sement wUl be placed i» O'*™”* ** taken and submitted along with a news story. A letter from the Shields family dated 1/3/95 was read to the commissioo suggested a short basketball court be added to Bedeiwood ct^ren The commissioners agreed that this would be a good “'dmoi^the * Sion for a possible court and an estimate on costs be Fdimary meeting. This addition would have to be placed amo^ "””L°^VlTSrom inclS Crystal Bay Park in the park budget. Gerhardson wdl respond to the letter from the Shields. WUson said the commission needs to look at planning and budgeting of the park dedication fees and schedule a budget discussion. adjournment White moved. Use seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Susan Wilson, Acting Chair ■“I'efiiSDr'DrHN'crTirs.....TtL:«n-"«'r-ci572.....*......jarrjr^s " c-.s- no.005 p.oi association of metropolitan ipaiitic BULLETIN munici es ALERT ALERT ALERl ALERT ALERT LGA/UACA IN JEOPARDY! Tho Governors' budget proposes I.OA cuts of $27inillion from 1995 aid distribution and HACA cuts of $30nnillion sliarcd with counties, also from 1995 distribution. Tlie Governor Implies tliat property taxes will not increase but does not suggest how. These cuts could equal between 2^ and ^ of your levy plus aid. total revenue boae. LEVY LIMITS TO RETURN? The DFL Legislative response to tlicsc initiatives is a temporaiy property tax freerc for 1996. In other words, very strict levy limits. Unfortunately, temporary often becomes permanent. The irony of both of these proposals is that we are not in a financial crisis aluation requiring aid cuts In an already budgeted and levy ceftilled year. City levy incieases over Uie past two years have been modest compared to other local govenimental units, and draconian solutions for only 15% of the overall property tax levy most certainly won't solve the pioblem. WHAT TO DO? Cities cannot afford to wait. We need to react quickly and voeitbrously. Call or meet with your legislators as soon as possible, l ell them what those cuts of up to 4%, or freezes will do to your local services, especially public safety. Crime is considered the number one problem issue by Minnesotans. The administration and legislature must not get in tlie way of or retard tlie first line of defense against crime prevention. Cities ability to provide for the public safety of people, including cliildtcji caiuiui be allowed to be compromised. 3490 Ic.tiiiglon avvmic iiorili, si. paiil, niiiinc.<;oiG 55126 (612) 490-3301 Daniel Sherman 2505 Old Beach Road Orono. MN 55391 Februar>’ 5,1993 Mr. Edward Callaghan, Jr. Mayor City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Cry stal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Edward Callaghan, I am wTiung to you to say thank you for closing Old Beach Road. When I am at the bus stop I feel much safer because the road is closed, and I am sure my siblings feel the same. Some of my family's friends wish the road wasn't closed, but they understand the safety issue involved. I am hoping that you will vote in favor of closing Old Beach .voad permanently. Minnesota Department of Health 925 Delaware Street Southeast RO. Box 59040 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040 (612) 627-5100 December 28, 1994 JAN 3 1995 Orono City Council c/o Ms. D. M. Haiiin, Clerk Orono City Hall Box 66, Crystal Bay Ofuno, Mirii'iesota 55323 Dear Council Members: This is to inform you tnat the Minnesota Department of Health has nearly completed development of the wellhead protection program. The objective of wellhead protection is to protect public health by safeguarding the areas which contribute water to public wells from potential sources of groundwater contamination. It is expected that this program will be implemented sometime in i995 following promulgation of the state wellhead protection rule. We are enclosing a copy of the newsletter that we have developed for the wellhead protection program. We will be sending yc < additional information about the wellhead protection program on a regular basis through this newsletter. Also, we will send you a copy of the wellhead protection rule when we have it ready for public review and comment. Because of the large number of public water suppliers In this state, It wac necessary to develop a ranking sci .sme for phasing public water supply systems into the program. This scheme is based on the percentage of vulnerable wells in the system and the size of the population serveo. Priority is also given to systems which serve children. Based on information that exists in our database at this time, your system is ranked number 1,236 out of the 1,586 community and nontransient noncommunity systems in Minnesota which rely on groundwater to serve their customers. This ranking Is subject to change should new information become available regarding your system. Information that could change your ranking includes data related to well water quality, well construction, pumping rates, and population served. In addition, any municipal system which adds a new well after the wellhead protection rule takes effect is immediately brought into the program regardless of its position on the current list. We TDD: (612) 627-6003 (Twin Cities) 1-800-627-3529 (Greater Minnesota) An Eaual OoDortunity Emolover Orono City Council Page 2 December 28, 1994 anticipate that for the next several years -^nly municipalities which add a well to V'a - system or public water suppliers who voluntarily want to develop wellhead protection plans will be brought into the wellhead protection program. If you have any questions regarding your ranking for phasing into the wellhead pi otection program, status of the wellhead prctaction rule, or any other aspects cl wellhead protection in Minnesota, please contact Mr. Bruce Olsen of my staff at (612) 627-5167. Sincerely, Gary L Englund, P.E., Program Manager Drinking Water Protection Section GLE;BMO:tvs Enclosure MINNeSOTA WRLHIAOnoncnoN lnff«ffmatlofi About Protootinf PuMIe Dooombor 1t#4 Agencies Ready to Assist Water Suppiiers The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is currently working with six communities to develop WHP plans The experience gained vith these pilot WHP efforts has helped to identity ihe training and technical support needs ot public water suppliers MDH vb lil assist public water suppliers with delineating W’HP arexs and preparing W HP plans. Tnese plans wiii cuuiain an inventory of potential contaminant sources in the W HP area, a strategy for source management, a monitoring strategy to assess source manage ment effectiveness, and a contingency plan to address interruption of the public water supply. MDH will hold workshops on preparing W HP plans for public water suppliers and local government staff. Also. W'HI’ program staff will work dirr.ilv with individual public water supp: cis to help them prepare and implencnt WHP plans. The Minne:>i)ta Department ot Agriculture, Minnesota Polluii »n Control Agency , and MDH itjve signed a memorandum ot agreement Cont. on puf^c 4 About this Publication The purpose of this publication is to provide information and education to water suppliers, local officials, and agencies about protecting public wells which supply drinking water. Editor: Ray Olson Wdlhcadlines staff: Bruce Olsen. Art Persons. Trudi Schmolke To request this document in another format, call (612) 627-510(). TDD (612) 627-6003. or for Gr-rater Minnesota through the Mmne.sota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 (ask for (6121 627-5100) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Program Moves to Implementation Stage The purpose of the WHP program is to prevent contamination of public water supply wells The 1986 amendments to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act require states to develop WHP programs The U S Environmental Protection Agency (U S. EPA) is responsible tor approving state programs. Also. Ihe 1989 Minnesota Ground water Protection .Act requires the ccmr...s:,:cr.;r of health to develop a Slate rule for WHP MDH has completed a draff of the state ’s WHP program plan and has also finished drafting the language for the stale W^P rule. U S. EPA approval of the proposed state WHP program and adoption of the draft WHP rule will ^v;,mit public water suppliers, state .agencies, and local governmeiiii to begin implementing the W1 IP program. PropcseJ WHP Area toi the City of Clear Lake MDH has developed the slate ’s WHP program with th- advice and recommendations of many organizations and individuals. Technica'. and policy workgroups provided recommenoalions regarding how WHP should be applied to public water supply wells. Another advisory group provided contment and advice on drafting the proposed stale WHP rule. Public water suppliers were represented on these workgroups througn persons from Ihe American Water Works Association and the Minnesota Rural Water Association. Under the proposed WHP program, all public water supply wells would have to be protected from disease organisms, physical damage, and direct entry of chemical contaminants. Owners of community and noniransient noncommunity _______Cont. on page 4 In this Issue Surveys of Water Suppliers and the Public........................2 Concerns about groundwater are apparent WHP Rules............................................................................3 Suppliers required to submit plans for WHP Local Governments and WHP..............................................^ Working with water suppliers to protect wells ^ Minnesota Department of Health 1 • " s* . , —• * 4 ts- i • W9llh0Mdnn0S 0«cf(nb«f 1M4 WHP Surveys Show Concerns about Contamination and Training Needs Surveys of public water suppliers and the general public were distributed by MDH in 19V3 The purpose w as to: 1) mexsure concerns about ground- water protection. 2) determine knowledge and attitudes towards WHP. and 3) determine whai edu cational methods may be ettective for these groups Sixty-five percent of suppliers indicated they had heard of W HP. but only 35 percent said they had moder ate or much knowledge of it. Large community suppliers had much more know ledge than the smaller com munity or noncommunity suppliers. two most important barriers. Ninety- three percent said they were of mixier- ate or great importance. Legal and jurisdictional issues ranked next in concern. One survey was disinbuied to all 954 community water suppliers in the state and to about SIX' noniransient non community suppliers. The response for this survey wa.s about 50 percent Contaminants of Concern to Public Water Suppliers Another survey was distributed to a sample or 600 •varer supp! v cu.stoincrs m tour cities ot (littering sizes (Rochester. LakeviUe. St. Peter. Randolp! , The ci'mliincd resp<'.ri'>e rate v. .i- .iver 47 percent in three cities w h.-:-.- the survey was mailed and UX) p-r. ent in St. Peter where it was brouthi door to door Surveys of Water Suppliers The survey of w ater suppliers indi cated that 43 percent believe that (here IS moderate or great concern about groundwater contamination in theit communities. Large community suppliers, serving more than 5.1XX) residents, indicated more concern. Sixteen percent of the suppliers indicated that contaminants had been disciivered in their wells Agricultural chemicals were the number one concern of suppliers Fitty-two percent of ihe suppliers said they had a mtrderaie or great concern Chemical spills and improper use and disposal ot chemicals were next in concern. Agrtcuituf3< C3lS Non Agnc Chemicals UHi'efgf'* ‘Hd Tanks Chemical GpiHs Abandoned Wells Landfills. Dumps Lawn. Garden Chemicals Septic Tanks Feealots Manure 50 60 %•0 10 20 30 40 •Percent indicating rr.oderate or great concern Water suppliers indicated they needed training m all areas ot W’HP. especially idcniitNiiig and managing contaminant sources. Over percent iCidicated this was - ' ^derate or great need. Communil> suppliers said that workshops were the most ettective method of education Over 90 percent said they would be moderately or greatly effective. Noi.communiiy suppliers preferred individual techni cal assistance more than workshops. Pamphlets and brochures were viewed as effective by about iwo-ihirds ot both groups Written res{K)nses to an open-ended “ question about what the state should do to help water suppliers protect wells indicated that edu cation Nvxs the most important thing the state could provide for suppliers. Nearly half the comments mentioned this need About 25 percent also mentioned the need for more enforcement of pollution laws ::: the need lor the state tc make new laws to control c )iiiumi- nation simrces that may aMcct their water supplies. Surveys of the General Public Thirty-seven percent of all re spondents said groundwater con tamination was a moderate or big problem in their communities. This concern was consistent in all four of the cities surveyed. Com. on next page General Public View of Contamination The sur\ ey also asked about barriers to implementing WHP Cost to the community and cost to contaminant source owners to correct contami- naiion problems were seen as the Randolph Rochester if St. Peter 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45%* •Percent indicating "moderate" or "big" problem. 0«CimtMr 1994 However, concern about health risks from drinking the water can vary greatly from city to city. Forty-three percent indicated there was a moderate or great ri^k in one city Thirteen per cent indicated this in two other cities and only 6 percent in the fourth city Just as in the survey of water sup- pli ;rs. the exccsstve use of agri cultural ferttlizcrs and pesticides were mentioned most often (81 percent) as an important source of contamination. There was much variation in the ranking ot the other contaminants listed on the survey Only 23 percent of the public had heard of WHP. but 29 percent indi cated they had moderate or .ruch knowledge of ways to prevent contamination Only about 20 percent of the ccneral publ.c in the three cttic- s.tkI personal activities posed a thi 4* to groundwater Hitwcver. 92 fMccnt said they "maybe wil'ing" rr ■ very willing" to make personal ch-rors to red'xe the threat. A tot.i. of 7S percent also said they mayln: willing or are very willing to pay more for their water to cn.surc a safer supply. Over 98 percent said it was at least of some importance for their community to be involved in an effort to protect groundwater Summary The needs assessment indientes that water suppliers and their customers are very concerned about contami nation of their wells—especially from agricultural sources However, the perception of health riskb from drinking the water varies from city to city Most water suppliers have some knowledge of WHP but need very Com. on page 4 WHP Rule Drafted Suppliers Required to Submit Plans for WHP MDH has completed drafting the WHP rule using an advisory workgroup consisting of public w aier suppliers, rcpresentaiives from local umts of govern- riicnt, state agency staff, and members of the regulated community. The draft rule would requ.re the development of a WHP plan for community wells, numbering about 2.4(X), and for nontransient noncommunity wells, numbering about l.Oa) Plans are not required for transient noncommunity wells The dratt rule would require all public water suppliers to maintain the isolation distances named m ihe stale Well Code for sources under iheir control. The draft rule outlines the elements that must be in a WHP plan. Key parts ot the plan include: 1) a delineation of a W’HP area, 2) a vulnerability assessment of the wells and the WHP area. 3) expeacd changes that could affect the water, 4) the establishment of goals, 5) a plan of action outlining the management of the WHP area. 6| a method of monitoring the effectiveness of the plan, and T) a contingcTiCv plan outlining an alternate waiei supply in the event or w.iier supply contamination o: interruption. The draft rule alM» establishes procedures tor the deveh^pment of a V HP plan tliat will ensure i, public participation, 2) an opportunity for local \rits of government wiih watci management and land-use authority to review Ox plan, and 3) approval of the plan by MDH as the plan is being developed. Ihese objectives are met through written notices, public informational meetings, and two "scoping ’* m'nrtings with the MDH which will review what inforriVition is needed for development of the plan. Other parts of the draft rule include: 1) the schedule for phasing wells into the program, 2) the criteria for delineating the W'HP area, • ; 3) pump test procedures, 4) criteria for assessing well vulnerability. 5) data elements required (depending on the vulnerability of the well and the W HP area), and 6) the principles MDH must use to review' and approve the plan. The projected lime of rule implementation is 1995 The official public hearing, if requested, and a series of informational meetings throughout the state will be held by MDH For a copy of the draft rule or a list ol individuals who have served on the rule development workgroup, please contact Art Persons at (507) 285-7289 or (612) 627-5481. Also, feel tree to contact Art Persons with any questions or comments you may have concerning the draft rule. Wellh^dUnes 0«c«mb«r 1994 MDH Assistance (Cont. from page I) regarding their roles in WHP. All three agencies will work with pniblic water suppliers to shaj; information and manage potential contaminant sources in WHP areas The Nlinnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and MDH have agreed to combine DNR conservation planning requirements with the contingency planning requirements of a WHP plan. In the seven-county Twin Cities area, this agrccmen; has been F i-.d-jc*- the N’etiLp Council, which requires communi ties to develop water supply system • plans. Here, one plan will meet the requirements of all the three agencies. WHP Implementation (Cont. from page I) N\dl> would also have to delineate capture zones (WHP areas' ‘i prepare plan.^ tor managing t- pMeniia! contaminant source, u this area which supplies water w- . charge the well Initially, only comrnunitio *..ch add wells to their water suppU s. rtns would have to delineate W'H.T a^eas and prepare W'HP plans. Pahiic water suppliers may voluntarily enter the W'HP program or wait until they are phased in by MDH Existing com munity and nontransient noncom munity v ells would be brought into the WHP program as time and resources permit. MDH will be contacting public water suppliers about the time and place for meetings where the proposed WHP rule will he dii cussed. A copy ot the proposed WHP rule will be sent to all community and nontransicnt noncom munity water suppliers when it is finalized. For additional information, call Bruce Olsen at (612) 62 /-5167. WHP Survey Results (Cunt, from page 3) specific information and training about delineating WHP areas and managing contaminant sources. The cost of WHP to the community and the cost to contaminant source owners is a great concern of water supply officials. They should, how« ever, be encouraged by the public support for protection programs revealed in the survev LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND WHP Local governments have a major role to play with helping public water suppliers prepare and implement WHP plans. Communities which are already working on WHP are receiving support from local agencies such as soil and w ater conservation districts, county health departments, county planmng and zoning departments, and Minnesota Extension. Local agen cies have experience with planning, public education, and land-use manage ment which will support efforts to protect public water supply v from con*arr.ination Also, counties and tow itship governments can use .ir adopt ordmaricci which will help manage potential contamman. source^ i.t portions of WHF areas which are not under the junsdiction.il ai*ih<aity of public 'vaicr suppliers The Association of Minncsiita Counties. Minnesota Township .V 'CialiOR. and League >',l Minnesota Ci*ies were represented on the workgr-. ;i^ which helped MDH develop policies for implementing the state WHP , ••'jrain and diatt language tor the WHP rale. Public water suppliers should ■ I'sider asking local governments and ag* ndcs to help prepare and implement WHP plans Wellheadlines Minnesota Department of Health Division of Environmental Health 925 S.E. Delaware Street. P.O. Box 59040 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55459-0040 Estimated 1995 aid cuts under Governor’s budget proposal ^;ZlTc^ oM no. haveihe opponunny .oadjus. .her ,995 propeny .ax ,.vy for .hese los. aids. f , i oox The Governor is also proposing an addi.ional 520 The numbers rellec. cu.s for 199.. The G rp ,he le»isla.ure adopts The GoVemo°s bate" Ihet ntml'er" upda.ed .0 reflec. ac.ua, ,99^ property .ax ‘''•l^e's'e are preliminary ™‘!}^e\uy ofThnne- 1 ! Total Estimated 1995 Aid Cut n -1 'll Total Cut As A Percent nf Tax Rate Increase if Cities Could Levy-Back 1 4.7% 1 r 1 •Citv OT 1 Ulol Aid 3 9%iNorthome ‘Northrop______■ 1.886 ; 11.10^ i 5.8°/Tr i 3.4°^ i 2.1% 1 NorwooQ ____________ iOak Grove ____ Woinht<> ; 25.876 i 27.293 1 18.9% ] 35.0% 1.0% i 0^ Ofsego Page 22 LMC Cities Bulletin { ^ PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED '5P0RT NBR. k1TISS-1 OF RUN 02/01/95 PERMIT ISSw/'J REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/95 - 01/31/95 JANUARY 1995 )PA(?E: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/94 - 01/31/94GRMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWailding GL FAMILY-NEW 3 4,764.00 1. 112,614.00 3,096.61 1 1,026.00 430,320.00 1,106.90F-ADD/REMODEL 9 2,111.00 236,100.00 1,006.81 11 3,169.50 424,550.00 1,690.14 F-ACC STRUCTURE 1 54.00 2,400.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 EMO/PRINCIPAL 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 OM-ADD/REMODEL 2 183.00 14,495.00 40.95 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ub-t * al 10*7,260.00*1,365,609.00*4,224.37*12*4,995.50*062,070.00*2,005.04* ‘^chanical GATING SYSTEMS 5 175.00 7,790.00 0.00 16 1,014.10 74,792.00 0.00 rREPLACE 4 191.25 11,100.00 0.00 7 347.50 24,100.00 0.00 GNTILATION 1 35.00 1,200.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,150.00 0.00 UCT WORK ONLY 2 7C.00 1,900.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 GMOVE OIL TANK 1 35.00 1,250.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ub-total 13*506.25*23,240.00*0.00*24*1,396.60*100,042.00*0.00* lumbing IXTURES 8 665.63 49,500.00 0.00 11 644.01 42,821.00 0.00 ATER METER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 705.00 0.00 0.00 ub-total 8*665.63*49,500.00*0.00*14*1,349.01*42,821.00*0.00* ewer & Water EWER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 AC ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 800.00 0.00 0.00 EWER & WATER 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ub-total 1*70.00*0.00*0.00*2*035.00*0.00*0.00* ign •ER./FREE STANDG 1 35.00 4 0.00 0.00 1 39.00 1,200.00 0.00 •ub-total 1*35.00*400.00*0.00*1*39.00*1,200.00*0.00* 'per Defined AND ALTERATION 1 75.00 3,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 REE REMOVAL 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 •ub-total 2*105.00*3,000.00*0.00*1*30.00*0.00*0.00* Jrand-total 43**0,649.80**1,441,749.00** 4,224.37** 54**0,645.11**1,006,933.00**2,885.04** REPORT NBR DATE OF RUNL ISisUliU/l-iJjS cXJUitiLTLUEERPT2-102/01/95 BASE FEB PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN PERMIT TOTAL building MECHANICAL H.UMRING 7,268.00 506.25 665.63 4,224.37 0.00 0.00 684.31 12.03 25.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.40 3.00 2,239.68 531.68 693.71 •• PERMIT REPORT ••CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 01/31/95SEWER k WATER 70.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.50 USER 105.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 \^ ^\GE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE 0.00 SIGN 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 FIRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 OATE OF RUN 02/01/95 111 • t BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE CilC. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT r^IL IN PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL e«649.88 4,224.37 721.92 0.00 0.00 63.00 0.00 16.40 13,675.57 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/95 TO 01/31/95 PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE WED, FEB is»i^995, '3:22 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1995 * . .*•;j PAGE 1PERMITWORKADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER BL 01 2735 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 95/01/10 OR-006643 00000000 01 460 SUSSEX LA 95/01/04 OR-006746 14750548 01 2055 SOMERSET LA 95/01/31 OR-006784 14766768 02 2100 WEBBER HILLS RJ 95/01/31 OR-006769 14786502 11 1105 FERNDALE RD W 95/01/17 OR-006754 18238046 370 BIG ISLAND 95/01/27 OR-006770 00000000 16 3200 NORTH SHORE DR 95/01/13 OR-006669 16334424 16 3206 NORTH SHORE DR 95/01/13 OR-006670 16334424 16 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 95/01/13 OR-006671 16334424 19 2607 WAYZATA BLVD 95/01/10 OR-006751 15592477 19 3465 SHORELINE DR 95/01/30 OR-006779 13873205 29 119 CHEVY CHASE DR 95/01/03 OR-006734 15429058 29 2166 EHADYWOOD RD 95/01/03 OR-006745 10047640 29 3466 IVY PL 95/01/06 OR-006740 00000000 29 2705 SHADYWOOD RD 95/Jl/lO OR-006753 00000000 29 1131 WILDHURST TR 95/01/18 OR-006756 17383285 29 2965 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/19 OR-006750 14710532 29 2071 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/27 OR-006766 14710532 10C 10C MB 01 650 BROWN RD N 95/01/03 OR-006689 00000000 01 2060 DEER RUN TR 95/01/09 OR-006750 34407920 01 2000 COUNTRYSIDE DR 95/01/20 OR-006762 34455620 01 2320 SHADOWOOD DR 95/01/27 OR-006773 36332561 02 245 TONKA AVE 95/01/17 OR-006757 35595900 02 2933 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/27 OR-00677S 28736209 03 1100 MILLSTON RD 95/01/17 OR-006755 00000000 24 2135 SHEVLIN DR 95/01/25 OR-006768 39414211 24 119 CHEVY CHASE DR 95/01/27 OR-006774 39296767 24 2967 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/27 OR-0O6776 38736209 24 265 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 95/01/30 OR-006780 24730793 24 3770 BAYSIDE RD 95/01/30 OR-006781 35378491 29 645 NORTH ARM DR 95/01/20 OR-006760 35350194 13C 13C PL 01 1760 CONCORDIA ST 95/01/C6 OR-006749 25297741 01 2990 SOMERSET LA 95/01/23 OR-^06763 29332521 01 2320 SHADOWOOD DR 95/01/26 OR-006771 24445950 24 1264 NORTH ARM DR 95/01/26 OR-006772 24721551 24 2933 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/27 OR-006777 28736209 24 2967 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/27 OR-006770 28736209 29 119 CHEVY CHASE DR 95/01/10 OR-006752 25334357 29 2166 SHADYWOOD RD 95/01/20 OR-006761 23313711 0C 0C SI 13 2607 WAYZATA BLVD 95/01/03 OR-006744 14273870 1C 1C SW 01 3026 CASCO POINT RD 95/01/31 OR-006783 24724959 1C 1C UD 23 2605 KELLY AVE 95/01/30 OR-006782 00000000 34 3237 CASCO CIR 95/01/20 OR-006759 14791701 2C 2C 43C OWNER LAST NM VALUATION JENSEN HOMES STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ STEPHENSON CONSTRUCTION SELA ROOFING CERES CONTRACTING CERES CONTRACTING CERES CONTRACTING WEST SIDE BUILDERS SCHAFER BUILDING MAINT VAN HEEL BROS CONSTRUCTION COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL SONNEN BROS CONST INC DANBERRY COMPANY DANBERRY COMPANY B R MOLINE MASONRY VIERECK FIREPLACE SALES FIRESIDE CORNER MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST KLEVE HTG k AC VOGT FRED fit CO KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST CITYVIEW PLBG fie HTG SUPERIOR CONTR INC DEAN'S TANK OIL LE VAHN BROS INC THOMPSON PLBG PLUMBMANIA INC GEZEL DENNIS PLBG KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST PLYMOUTH PLUMBING AAA ABBOTT PLBG fit HTG WILDMAN RITCHIE BAGLEY LARSON FORSTER HENSON TUCKER CASEY CULLITON KNUDSON WOLFE GARRETT MCCARTY GALLTSTEL BURWELL BAKER ROSEBOOM GOLDSMITH GARDINER WEEKS WOLD MUELLER GALLISTEL ROSEBOOM HENSON 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WOLD STODDARD 207, 450, 375, 54, 5, 2, 4, 10, 45, 65, 1, 25, 4, 15, 20, 614.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 900 00 400.00 .00 .00 .00 000.00 495.00 300.00 000.00 900.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 500.00 6.900.00 1.900.00 1.100.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 1.390.00 700.00 1.200.00 2.500.00 1,000.00 1.250.00 5.000. 00 15,250.00 7.000. 00 350.00 3.200.00 1.500.00 10,000.00 6.400.00 400.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 1,441,749.00* JANIARY 1995 01 Residence 2402Addition25 03 Garage/Attached 26 04 Garage/Detached 27 05 Porch 28 06 Deck 29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 32 10 Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 34 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal LOCAL USB CODBS 9999 Undefined WED, FEB 3:20 PM Ai:^ ’PAGE 1NUMERICAL LISTING JANUARY 1995PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION207,614.00.00.00.00 GARRETT 500.00 FORSTER 45,300.00 400.00 HENSON 65,000.00 WILDMAN 450,000.00 TUCKER 1,900.00 WOLD 5.000. 00 6,900.00 4.000. 00 10,000.00 CASEY 25,000.00 BAGLEY 5,900.00 BURWELL 1,000.00 CULLITON 4,000.00 MCCARTY 1,200.00 KNUDSON 15,000.00 NAS I EDI.AK .00 WEEKS 1,250.00 HENSON 6.400.00 1.900.00 15,250.00 WOLFE 20.000.00 BAKER 1,990.00 RITCHIE 54,OCu.OO LARSON 2.400.00 7.800.00 MUELLER 150.00 1,100.00 700.00 GALLISTEL 1,200.00 ROSEBOOM 1,200.00 GALLISTEL 3,200.00 ROSEBOOM 1,500.00 10,495.00 GOLDSMITH 2,500.00 GARDINER 1,800.00 STODDARD 3,000.00 WOLD .00 375,000.00 OR-006643OR-006669OR-006670OR-006671 OR-006689 OR-006734 OR-006744 OR-006745 OR-006746 OR-006748 OR-006749 OR-006750 CR-006751 OR-006752 OR-006753 OR-006754 OR-006755 OR-006756 OR-006757 OR-006758 OR-006759 OR-006760 OR-006761 OR-006762 OR-006763 OR-006766 OR-006768 OR-006769 OR-006770 OR-006771 OR-006772 OR-008773 v^R-006774 OR-006775 OR-006776 OR-006777 OR-006778 OR-006779 OR-006780 OR-006781 OR-006782 OR-006783 OR-OOe784 43C 95/01/1095/01/1395/01/1395/01/13 95/01/03 95/01/03 95/01/03 95/01/03 95/01/04 95/01/06 S5/01/06 95/01/09 95/01/10 95/01/10 95/01/10 95/01/17 95/01/17 95/01/18 95/01/17 95/01/19 95/01/20 95/01/20 95/01/20 95/01/20 95/01/23 95/01/27 95/01/25 <^5/01/31 95/01/27 95/01/26 95/01/26 95/01/27 95/01/27 95/01/27 95/01/27 95/01/27 95/01/27 95/01/30 95/01/30 95/01/30 95/01/30 95/01/31 95/01/31 NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2735328032063290 650 119 2687 2166 460 3466 1760 2860 2687 119 2705 1105 1100 1131 245 2965 3237 645 2166 2800 2990 2871 2135 2100 370 2320 1264 2320 119 2933 2967 2933 2967 3465 265 3770 2605 3026 2055 COUNTRYSIDE DR W NORTH SHORE DR NORTH SHORE DR NORTH SHORE DR BROWN RD N CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA BLVD SHADYWOOD RD SUSSEX LA IVY PL CONCORDIA ST DEER RUN TR WAYZATA BLVD CHEVY CHASE DR SHADYWOOD RD FERNDALE RD W MILLSTON RD WILDHURST TR TONKA AVE CASCO POINT RD CASCO CIR NORTH ARM DR SHADYWOOD RD COUNTRYSIDE DR SOMERSET LA CASCO POINT RD SHEVLIN DR WEBBER HILLS RD BIG ISLAND SHADOWOOD DR NORTH ARM DR SHADOWOOD DR CHEVY CHASE CASCO POINT CASCO POINT CASCO POINT CASCO POINT SHORELINE DR OLD CRYSTAL BAY BAYSIDE RD KELLY AVE CASCO POINT RD SOMERSET LA DR RD RD RD RD RD N 01161616 01 29 13 29 01 29 01 01 19 29 29 11 03 29 02 29 3\ 29 29 01 01 29 24 02 15 01 24 01 24 02 24 24 24 19 24 24 23 01 01 00000000 16334424 16334424 16334424 00000000 15429058 14273870 10847648 14750548 00000000 25297741 34407920 15592477 25334357 00000000 18238046 00000000 17383205 3559590C 147105J2 14791701 35350194 2331371j 34455620 29332521 14710532 39414211 14786502 00000000 24445958 24721551 36332561 39296767 28736209 38736209 20736209 28736209 13073205 24730793 35370491 00000000 24724959 14766760 CERES CONTRACTin CERES CONTRACTING CERES CONTRACTING VAN HEEL BROS CONSTRUCTION ALL SIGN CO COMMERCIAL k RESIDENTIAL JENSEN HOMES LR VAHN BROS INC B R MOLINE MASo.,KY WEST SIDE BUILDERS PLYMOUTH PLUMBING SELA ROOFING SONNEN BROS CONST INC MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO DANBERRY COMPANY SUTHERLUNDS NURSERY & TREE DEAN'S TANK OIL AAA ABBOTT PLBG & HTG VIERECK FIREPLACE SALES THOMPSON PLBG DANBERRY COMPANY KLEVE HTG & AC STEPHENSON CONSTRUCTION PLUMBMANIA INC GEZEL DENNIS PLBG FIRESIDE CORNER VOGT FRED & CO KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST KLUVER MECHANICAL CONS'^ SCHAFER BUILDING MAINT CITYVIEW PLBG k HTG SUPERIOR CONTR INC WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ 5-ZONING PEKKI'rS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR.^'wfeMTISS-l DATE OF RUN 02/01/95 JANUAKY 1995***** permit I^kD REPORT *•*•*CITY OF ORONO \PAGE: IREQUESTER: CAROLEPERMIT TYPE QTY . . . . . . CURRENT01/01/95 -BASE FEE RANGE . . . . .01/31/95VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY 01/01/94 - BASE FEE RANGE . . . . .01/31/94VALUATION PLAN REVIEWUser Defined SUBDIVISION 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 2 600.00 0.00 0.00VARIANCE4950 CO 0.00 0.00 1 200.00 0.00 0.00CUP00. tc 0.00 0.00 1 125.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 1 2b0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00APPEAL1ICO.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Sub*total 7*1,600.00*0.00*0.00*4*925.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 7**1,600.00**0.00*^0.00**4**925.00**0.00** 0.00** •* . ^ 'f A •~'r. ^ f REPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN EERPT2-1 02/01/95 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 1,600.OC 1,600.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE C.OO 0 00 SA*’0 00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 1,600.00 1,600.00 'kr* REPORTPERMIT CITY OF OF *JO FROM 01/C*/95 TO 01/31/95 _PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 1995 RFCAP OF CONTRACT CITIESJanuary February Harch April June July August September October November December YTD TotalsSpring ParkPlan Review 0.00 Inspections 225.00 Retainer 25.00 TOTAL 250.00 No. Plan Reviews 0 No. Inspections 15 0.00225.00 25.00250.00 015Minnetonka Beach Plan Review Inspections Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 0.00 135.00 25.00 160.00 0 9 0.00 135.00 25.00 160.00 0 9 410.00 410.00