The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-23-1995 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA % %^4. 32. AAA Pedestrian Safety Award - JoAnne Boche APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of January 9, 1995 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING CONLMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) POLICE CHIEF REPORT 4. School Liaison Officer Upd?*c ZONLNG ADMLNISTRATOR’S REPORT 5. #1989 William Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 6. B-2 Ordinance Proposed Amendment MAVOR/COLTs’CIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 7. Kelly Avenue Drainage CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 8. Long Lake Water Quality Cooperative Agreement 9. Award 1995 Materials & Equipment Bids * 10. Confirm 1995 Board of Review Date *11. Resolution of Appreciation - Alex Vongries * 12. ADA Compliance Audit - Cost Correction CITY ATTORN'EY’S REPORT (-13 » MCENSES (*14.) BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SEF FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 01/20 - Planning Commission Work Session 7:30 a.m. 01/23 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 01/24 - Orono School Board meeting in Orono Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. 01/25 - Orono School Board meeting Noon - 4:30 p.m. 02/01 - Orono School Board meeting Noon - 4:30 p.m. 02/06 - Park Commission 7:15 p.m. 02/13 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/14 - Orono School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/15 - Orono School Board meeting Noon - 4:30 p.m. 02/20 - HOLIDAY - Presidents’ Day 02/22 - Planning Commission 01/27 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/28 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION COUNCIL PTTBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE /- 9 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)address PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. _ 5.._ 6._ 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14.. 15.. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 9,1995 % y.1a'Y ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present; Mayor Callahan. Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten. Gabriel Jabbour, and Charles Kelley, JoEllen Hurr arrived at 7:25 p.m. Representing Staff were City Administrator, Ron Moorse; City Attorney, Tom Barrett; Public Works Director, John Gerhardson; Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator, Michael GalTron; City Engineer. Glenn Cook, who arrived at 7;25 p m., and Recorder. Sheny Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 6;50 p m. i#\) 6:40 P.M. O.ATII OF OFFICE City Administrator Moorse administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Callahan as well as Council Members Goetten and Jabbour. (#2) 6:45 P..M. PUBLIC HEARLNG - PERSONAL WATERCRAFT ON LONG L/\KE ORDINANCE, 6:50-7:00 P.M. AND 7:40-7:45 P.M. - ORDINANCE #131, 2ND SERIES The Cenificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mayor Callahan said the ordinance was originally authored by previous Long Lake Council Member Mary Miller. The ordinance's purpose is to limit the number of hours of operation of personal watercraft vehicles on Long Lake to between sunrise and sunset, or 6;00 p.m., whichever is earlier. It is also to prevent racing of such vehicles unless special permits have been obtained. Long Lake falls under the jurisdiction of both Long Lake and Orono. Council members from both cities were present along with Long Lake Mayor, Todd Olson, who arrived at about 7:40 p.m. Mayor Olson said the ordinance would be beneficial to both cities, and the purpose of the ordinance is not to deprive lake users of these vehicles but to restrict their usage. During public comments. Barb Lukens of 776 Brown Road North said she was happy with the response of Council to this concern and finds the ordinance satisfactory. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt the personal watercraft ordinance and to authorize Staff to submit the proposed ordinance and any supporting documentation to the DNR for its review. Ayes 5, Nays 0. The Mayor and Council of Long Lake also moved and passed the motion to adopt the ordinance. Mayor Olson and Gerhardson will post ordinance signs in their respective Cities on Long Lake. minutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9.1995 (#3) AAA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD - JOANNE BOCHE Moorse reported the cancellation of this item The award will be presented at another time. (*#4) CONSENT AGENDA Items 8, 9, 11,12, 14,15. and 19 were added to the Consent Agenda. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (»#5) REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 12,1994 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of December 12, 1994 Ayes 4, Nays 0. EXECUTIVE SESSION OF DECEMBER 12,1994 Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, approval of increasing the hours of Officer John Schoenhoff from part-time to full-time, with pay at the one year contract rate, effective January 2, 1995. Ayes, 3. Callahan, Jabbour, and Hurr; Nays 1, Kelley. Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, that Staff be directed to work with the City Attorney to improve the City's hiring processes with the purpose of meeting all legal requirements. Ayes 4, Nays 0. Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, that the Chy terminate its membership in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System (MPRS). Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS (#7) RESIGNATION OF VICE CHAIR ALEX VONGRIES The Council accepted the resignation of Alex Vongries as Vice Chair of the Parks Commission. Goetten moved, Callahan seconded, to draff a resolution to be sent to Vongries in appreciation of his work on the Park Commission. Ayes 4, Nays 0. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORDNO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9, 1995 (Park Commission Comments - Continued) Park Commissioner Susan Wilson reported that the Commission was reviewing the natural areas owned by the City. It is the Conrniission’s wish to make these areas user friendly and accesnble. The Highwood Nature Trail on CoRd 19 is being upgraded to include a parking lot, trailhead sign, and picnic table. The parking area will be a small crescent-shaped size for 3-4 cars with the ability for bus access for unloading passengers. At present, there is no access or shoulder on the road. Council members received a park plan from 1971, designed by Jim Gilbert, the naturalist. This trail is in keeping with the present plan now under consideration. The trail area was purchased for $14,000. The cost of the upgrades is estimated to be between $5,000 and $6,000. The Park Commission will present their plan and costs to the Council at an upcoming meeting. Callahan directed City Administrator to post notices for the Park Commission vacancy. Callahan also noted that as normal terms end relatively soon. Staff should contact those Commissioners to see if they are uilerested in continuing to serve on the commission. Council members were agreeable to this plan. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Dale Lindquist, represented the Planning Commission. There were no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT i*m) #1982 DANIEL S. PERKINS, 55 LANDMARK DRIVE - VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3512 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3512 for a variance^conditional use permit for Daniel S. Perkins. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#9) #1985 BRUCE BREN HOMES, 1000 COX FARM ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3513 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded to approve Resolution #3513 for a conditional use permit for Bruce Bren Homes. Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9. 1995 (#10) B-2 ORDINANCE PROPOSED AMENDMENT Concerns over the present draft were noted. Keilcy clarifted that landscaping and screening must be complied with prior to issuance of any conditional use permits and requested confirmation that Council members were willing to uphold this stipulation. Moorse is concerned with the portion of the ordinance that creates new conditional uses. The City is currently able to say no to certain usages. Under the proposed arnendmem. certain usages could be done with a conditional use permit, which in effect, says the usage is okay within certain parameters. Moorse stressed caution should be taken in this area. New accessory items were C, J, and M (refer to packet). Goetten and Callahan felt that with adding conditional uses, the City gains the ability to work with people on improving conditions. Hurr was concerned with snowmobile sales and service and the policing of this area as well as the maintenance base issue. All Council members agreed to eliminate these from the ordinance. Barrett reiterated to the Council that the City has the power to regulate but does not have the power to take property. Hours of operation were discussed under D and E on page 6. It was agreed that wording should be added to state that boats for hire are not considered private. Cotmcil agreed on the need for charter boats but are concerned with theport-of-call use. Parking may become an issue here. Caretaker dwellings were discussed. It was determined to consider this an accessory use instead of a conditional use. Gaffron said that any accessory use item can create parking problems so changing certain accessory uses to conditional uses would aid in requiring additional parking for such use. It was decided that if an accessory usage created parking on the street. Staff can change parking requirements. Subd. 15 on page 8 was questioned as it was noted that the City Attorney recommended eliminating this from the amendment. Banett said this was in relation to the City not being able to regulate the number of boat slips. Under 19 on page 9, it was noted to change Ordinances of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation Department to District. Hurr asked for a better clarification of what is considered a "full-course meal" under D. Callahan suggested that by the wording of prepared and prepackaged before coming on premises would cover any concern over preparing food and selling on premises. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9.1995 (#10 - B-2 Ordinance Proposed Amendment - Continued) Staff will make changes to the draft based on the Council’s concerns and present at the next Council meeting. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Cancellation of work session meeting for Thursday was noted. Kelley asked what the Council would like to see for fiiture development around the Hwy 12 area. Kelley voiced his displeasure with a possible proposal for a major grocery store southwest of Hwy 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road. Moorse said Staff would like to see direction from the Council on future development. Office and high density residential, but no major retail, has been the thrust, but mput for the future is needed as developers are looking at this area for new sites of development. Gaffron indie.,ted he would provide Council with a summary of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code sections regarding the Highway 12 Corridor. Jabbour reported an attempt by an owner to sell land to the DNR, who was not interested, but a land swap was also mentioned. Jabbour was concerned that the DNR did not notify the City and reiterated the DNR had agreed to notify the City whenever they were considering the purchase of property in Orono. ENGINEER REPORT (•#11) PAY REQUEST #1 AND FINAL - 1994 SEAL COAT PROJECT Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded to approve payment of the 1 st and final request for the 1994 seal coat in the amount of $35,606.15 to Allied Blacktop Company. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#12) PAY REQUEST #2 - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve payment #2 for the Old Crystal Bay Road project in the amount of $88,529.99 to Bufialo Bituminous, Inc. Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9, 1995 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#13) OLD BEACH ROAD THROUGH TRAFFIC PROBLEM Moorse reported that this issue relates to traffic problems on Old Beach Road. It has been found that a large number of vehicles, 3600 a day, are using this road as a shortcut between CoRds 15 and 19. Staff has had discussions with the residents on alternatives and is recommending restriction of the access to Old Beach Road. Staff is proposing to close the CoRd 19 end of Old Beach Road, thus eliminating it as a through road. Traffic will then need to go to the CoRd 15 and 19 "mtersection. Moorse has spoken with the county about left turn arrows at CoRds 15 and 19 to facilitate the traffic flow. Barricades are proposed to be used to temporarily close the road over the winter which will allow time to assess the closure. A possible cul-de-sac would be installed later. Barrett said a public hearing would be necessary before permanently closing oflfthis access or neighbors may petition for a variance. In emergency situations, the City docs have the authority to temporarily close a road without a public hearing. Kirk Sherman of 2505 Old Beach Road presented the neighbors concerns. The neighbors support the cul-de-sac option < • • w»i>ty the safety issue. The police department has estimated the speed of cars traveling on this road to be between 40-50 mph but there is no safe p*ace to set up surveillance to monitor violations of the speed limit laws. There have been four school bus incidents where cars have driven around a bus which has had its stop sign extended and red flashers on. It was reported by Sherman and Council Member Hurr that the Minnetonka Beach Council is also looking into this issue. It was determined that a cul-de-sac would require a large enough turnaround for a bus or emergency vehicle. Discussion was held on how this would occur during the temporary closing. Staff will determine the costs involved for this change and discuss with the County the changes for the turn arrows prior to the public hearing meeting. Jim Krey of2560 Old Beach Road owns the property where the turnaround would be placed. He is in favor of this action and sees it as the reasonable solution to the problem. It was his opinion that the short cut was only a perceived one. Hurr said that she could not support this closure until timed turn arrows were installed at CoRd 15 and 19 and the "no passing" sign west on CoRd 15 be removed. Moorse also said that the County could provide signs stipulating that this road will be closed to notify the public prior to its occurrence. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY (XHJNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9, 1995 (#13 - Old Beach Road Through Traffic Problem - Continued) Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize the Staff to temporarily close Old Beach Road to through traffic. A resolution will be brought before the Council in the spring for permanem closure, following a full public hearing. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#14) NORTH SHORE DRIVE NO PARKING SIGNAGE (NEAR PUBLIC ACCESSES) - RESOLUTION #3514 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3514 requesting Hennepin County Public Works to post certain roadways a "No Parking Tow Away Zone." Ayes 4, Nays 0 (•#15) AUTHORIZATION OF ADA COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the proposal from Julee Quarve-Peterson, Inc. to provide consulting services for the purpose of asristance in complying with the laws pertaining to accessibility for all persons with disabilities at a cost not to exceed $4,775.00, to be ftmded from the special projects contingency accoum. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#16) ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNCIL WORK SESSION(S) The work session scheduled for Thursday, 1/12/95, was excelled. Callahan will set a new meeting for next week. Council's availability was discussed. Kelley will be absent from the 1/23 meeting, Callahan from the February meetings; Jabbour the 2/13 meeting. (#17) 1995 APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION #3515 Callahan moved, Kelley seconded to adopt Resolution #3515 designating appointments for 1995. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Callahan designated Goetten to chair the Council meeting in February when both Callahan and Jabbour were absent. (#18) 1995 MEETING SCHEDULE Hurr agreed to accept the 7;00 p.m. start time for the Council meetings. She noted that this could cause her to be late to several meetings this year but since other members wanted the meetings to begin and end earlier, she would not challenge the time change. Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt the proposed 1995 meeting schedule. Ayes 4, Nays 1, Hurr. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9, 1995 (•<^I9) PARK COMMISSION LIAISON SCHEDULE Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the schedule for Council attendance at the Park Commission meetings for 1995. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#20) REQUEST TO CREATE A CENTRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Moorse reported that this proposal is to enable the finance department to consolidate a number of miscellaneous expenses that are currently pro-rated among departments into a central services department which will account for these expenditures. The total General Fund expenditure budget remains the same. Council was concerned with being able to break do’.i'* an item such as insurance for accountability amongst different departments. Kelley said it is important to be able to distinguish the true costs of doing business especially when we provide services to other cities. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to create the Central Services Department within the General Governmental functions of the City, eflfective January 1, 1995, and to direct Staff to incorporate all necessary changes in the 1995 Budget document to reflect the creation of the Central Services Department. Ayes 5. Nays 0. (•#21) PAY LEVEL FOR CORPORAL ASSIGNMENT Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the 2% pay differential for Officers Anderson, Comick and Dembouski effective January 16, 1995. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#22) MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITING SYSTEM (MPRS) MEMBERSHIP TERMINATION - RESOLUTION #3516 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3516 terminating the City’s membership in the MPRS Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett had no report at this time. (•#23) LICENSES Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the following licenses: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 9, 1995 (#23 - Licenses - Continued) Residential Kennel License:Steve Esco 320 Big Island Sue Fackler 3700 Togo Road Jane Kline/Steve Bell 4455 West Branch Road G. James & Judith A. Spinner 940 North Arm Drive (»#24)B1LLS Goctten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Goetten moved, Callahan seconded, to adjourn at 9:10 p.m. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Police % Stephen X. Sullivan Chief of Police Post Office Box 86 Cr>sial Bay, MN 55323 2730 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 % % V . Administration 473-7710 Non-Emergency 525-6210 Fax 473-5183 Emergency 911 % ■■ V-' January 20, 1995 Mayor Callahan; ^^A r^n^ irp rsDorts, 55 criininal casss, 130 In summary, 104 police reports, j ^ ^as been student contacts, and 75 parent contacts. has Been pLt of the workload that I have processed as the School Liaison Officer. on January 23, 1995 I will present a short review of the school Liaison program to date. Attached to this letter are several forms that provide more detailed inform about this position. The form titled " the outline I will follow for your January 23rd meeting. Sincerely, Scott Boris Police Officer Serving North Lake Minnetonka Communities of Orono. Long Lake. Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park PRESENTATION RE<;OirRCE OFFICER Bring the resources of the police department to the school. Concentrate on trouble areas in the school. Provide classroom instruction. Be available to answer student, and faculty questions about police and court system subjects. prf.-det.tmoijent intervention (Our big pay off) Intervening with a student before the behavior gets to a crisis level. A step in the disciplinary chain. tTET.PTNC; TN THE ASSESSMENT OF A STUDENT Provide information eibout a student being assessed. Share student information among other law enforcement agencies. MISCELLANEOUS Budget Current and future funding. Being part of the team at the Orono School District. JOB TASKS (In priority order) Law Enfrirr^ment Reporting and processing criminal cases. Fnllnw UP Processing the paper work for my contact with students. This includes case investigations and necessary paper work for processing police reports. Pre-Delinouent behavior The identification and intervention of students who are showing signs of resistiveness behavior for criminal violations and school violations. Documentaticn . The process of tracking my activities and contacts. Preparing and disseminating monthly reports. Completing miscellaneous paper work related to the position not covered under case follow up. Information Provide information to students and faculty about police and ways to access our services. Counseling Follow up with students who have been involved in minor or first time criminal or rule violating behavior. Being available for students to come to me with questions or problems. Parent follow UD Contacting parents of students that I have counseled to answer their questions or address their concerns. Meeting Attendance . Attending meetings with school staff and students to contribute or receive information about students. Extra Curricular Activities Attending sports events, dances, retreats. Youth in Action activities as a police officer or chaperon. classes Provide classes to students in support of teachers requests or make arrangements for other law enforcement staff to present classes on related subjects. Etudent Center Be available at the Orono Student Center after school and on special occasions. SCHOOL LIAISON MONTHLY REPORT By Scott Boris Month of: December 94 CURRENT YEAR TO DATE SCHOOL ACTIVITIES^ Police Initiated Client Initiated Total TOTAL Meetinqs Attended 5 21 Professional contacts 6 5 1 11 30 Student contacts 22 1 1 30* Counselinq 3 5 8 53 Law Enforcement 9 5 14 44 1 f Parent Contacts 22 74* Counselinq 7 2 9 31 Law Enforcement 13 1 3 33 Teacher Contacts 8 39* Request for class 2 2 8 Student Info 2 ^2 6 Misc 4 4 3 Extra Curricular 1 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT Initiated Assigned TOTAL TOTAL Theft 5 5 18 Vandalism 5 Assault 2 2 12 Orug/Alcohol Cases 1 1 12 Other Cases 2 2 8 Dispositions School Only 1 1 7 Diversion 1 1 7 Court 2 2 2 I.C.R.’s 39 39 104 Professional Contact: Includes Psychologists, Social Workers, Lawyers, Police Officers from other departments. Etc. Police Initiated: Liaison starts. Client Initiated: Student, Teacher or Parent starts. • Grand totals are different because we did not always track each individual category. DEFINITIONS OP MONTHLY REPORT ITEMS fiPHOQL ACTIVITIES CLIENT INITIATED: Means that either the student, parent or faculty contacted me. (Depending on which category is listed) POLICE INITIATED: These are contacts that I initiate. MEETINGS ATTENDED: Number of meetings that I attend. (e.g.. Student Assistance Team meetings, Liaison review meetings, etc.) PROFESSIONAL CONTACTS: Includes Social Workers, Psychologists, Lawyers, Special Education Teachers, Police Officers from other departments. I count a professional contact as a contact where a specific request is being made. I do not count this as contact if it is simply an exchange of information. STUDENT CONTACT: Significant contact with a student. This usually means that I have talked to them face to face about a specific problem or situation. COUNSELING: Any matter tha is not related to a crime or criminal investigation. LAW ENFORCEMENT: Any contact that has to do with a criminal case or potential criminal case. PARENT CONTACT: Significant contact with a parent. This usually is conducted over the phone. Often it is related to a specific problem that a parent is having with a child. TEACHER CONTACT: Any significant contact with a teacher. REQUEST FOR CLASS: If a teacher asks me to give a class or requests that I find someone in law enforcement to give a class. STUDENT INFO: Teacher requesting information about a specific student. They usually have noticed a change in the student's behavior and would like additional information. MISC.: Any other information that they need/request dealing with police work in general. EXTRA CURRICULAR: Any activities that I attend that are sponsored by the school and are normally not during school hours. LAW ENFORCEMENT THEFT; VANDALISM; ASSAULT; DRUG/ALCOHOL; OTHER CASES: Criminal cases that happen under the jurisdiction of the school. INITIATED: Cases that I start directly. ASSIGNED: Cases that another officer has started and are then assigned to roe for follow up. DISPOSSESSIONS: How cases, crimes and incidents are handled. SCHOOL ONLY: The school deals with the situation internally. DIVERSION: The Liaison forwards the case to our diversion program. COURT: Cases that are completed by an arrest or a case being forwarded to the County Attorney for charges. I.C.R.'s: The number of formal police reports that I generate as the Liaison Officer. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Janu^ 19. 1995 t-A. rrp ITEM NO.:^ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusih Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectiofn:/ Zoning Item Description: M19S9 William Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Additional Exhibits O - Applicant ’s Letter of 1/9/95 Addressed to City Officials P-1-8 Acknowledgements from Eight Neighbors Approving Proposal Subject to Directives of MCWD, Department of the Army/Corps of Engineers and the City of Orono Permit Brief Review of Application In the summer of 1994, applicant received approval for a conditional use permit that would allow the restoration of a guest house on his property. During the remainder of the summer he obtained the necessary permits from the MCWD to allow restoration of the shoreline involving rip rapping and a sand blanket. For the past year he has also been working with the Public Works Department regarding the flooding problems adjacent to his property at Kelly Avenue along with his plan to relocate his driveway. His goal was to relocate the curb cut further north away from the flooding area and to provide an additional ponding area for surface runoff retention. The pond itself will have minimal effect on the flooding problems in the area. The Engineer notes in his report. Exhibit H, that the proposed pond will have no impact on proposed Kelly Avenue storm water improvements, review Exhibit L. The proposed pond will be located to the immediate nortl. of the improvement project. Planning Commission was concerned that although the area is not designated as a wetland nor is it a protected wetland of the DNR, Watershed District or Corps, they noted that a wetland exists there today. They added that there are cattails and signs of other wetland-type vegetation. The Type 1 wetland has been created by the seasonal flooding of the applicant s street yar during the spring and summer months. The Planning Commission objected to the creation of a 60’ X 60’ decorative pond in the street yard so close to the roadway. They would not approve a decorative pond for this location and recommended that applicant pursue installing a Type 3 wetland which would be considered an upgrading of the existing Type 1. Members wanted to discourage the manicured lawn-type look and to maintain the natural wetland-type look adjacent to the roadway consistent with other surrounding Kelly Avenue properties. They discouraged the use of boulders and recommended that applicant continue to work with the Public Works Zoning File #1824 January 19, 1995 Page 2 Director concerning additional improvements within the unimproved right-of-way of Kelly Avenue. The sides of the pond were to be graduated until it reached its maximum depth of 8 at the middle They saw no problems with any safety issues if the pond bad graduated banks in the proposed location as City has ordinances that approve residential pools without fencmg. Planning Coniniission Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously approved the application, subject to excavation being amended so that a Type 3 wetland was installed in place of the proposed decorative pond, and provided the following guidelines to applicant: 1.No boulders were to be used around the disturbed area. 2.Applicant was to provide a plan for landscaping with appropriate aquatic vegetation to be reviewed by staff and the Engineer. 3.All disturbed areas were to be seeded by the spring of 1995. 4.Banks were to be graded with graduated slopes not to exceed 3:1 to a maximum depth of 7-8’ at the middle. 5.All fill not to be used with the regrading of wetland/banks is to be removed from site. 6.Excavations are limited to the movement of 600 cubic yards. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission ’s unanimous recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. I i A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 1989 WHEREAS, William J. Stoddard (hereinafter the "applicant") is the owner of the propeny located at 2605 Kelly Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as; Lot 5, Block 5, including adjoining vacated 34 ’ of Kelly Avenue, Townsite of Langdon Park, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to allow the excavation of a 60’ x 60’ pond within the street yard of his lakeshore property involving land alterations proposed at a maximum 600 cubic yards where the Code requires conditional use permit approval for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. Minnesota: 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1989. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 73,008 s.f. or 1.68 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application on January 17, 1995 and recommended unanimous approval of the conditional use permit as amended based on the following findings: a. The proposed excavations will have no impact on the City ’s proposed storm water improvements for the Kelly Avenue neighborhood. Page 1 of 4 The proposal as amended will present no hazards for the public who use the adjacent public roadway. The applicant ’s proposal has received approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Army Corps of Engineers. d.The proposal will have no negative impacts on the adjacent residential properties within the immediate Kelly Avenue neighborhood. 4.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the creation of an open water area or Type 3 wetlands within the street yard of this lakeshore property' will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the piopeny will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the i^roposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the excavation and creation of a Type 3 wetland involving the movement of approximately 600 cubic yards of fill within the street yard of the lakeshore property, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall apply for a land alteration perimt from the City before work can commence. Applicant or applicant ’s contractor shall provide the following information with the permit application: a.Grading plans showing cross-section/profile of wetland to reflect graduated banks not to exceed 3:1 slopes and a maximum depth at the middle of wetland to not exceed 8 feet. Page 2 of 4 2. 3. b. Planting schedule noting types of aquatic vegetation to be planted within wetland area and the location of these plantings. c. All use of boulders adjacent to the wetland shall be discouraged. If there is a need to provide barrier to this area, it must be done with natural plantings or berming. d. The area shall be restored so that it shall remain in a natural wetland state not requiring grass cutting or trimming of vegetation within defined wetland. The entire disturbed area within the private property and the right-of-way of Kelly Avenue is to be restored by seeding in the spring of 1995. Applicant shall continue to work with the Public Works Department regarding additional improvements within the unimproved right-of-way of Kelly Avenue. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner but are permissive only and must be exercised by applicant obtaining an application for a land alteration permit within one week of the date of Council’s approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (January 30, 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of January, 1995. Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) _ ^ u- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day or January 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the pe'rson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 ( TO: DATE: 7 Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator January 11, 1995 SUBJECT: #1989 William Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB, approximate area 1+ acres. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03. Subd. 19 - Conditional use permit required for excavation of a 60’x60* pond within the street yard of lakeshore property. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant’s Addendum C - Property Owner’s List D - Plat Map E - Partial Survey F - Proposed Grading Changes in Kelly Avenue Right-of-Way G - Landscape Plan H - Gustafson Report I - Department of the Army Report 9/16/94 J - MCWD Letter 7/25/94 K - Letter of Credit L - Storm Sewer Plan for Kelly Av mue M - Photos N - Letters to City of Orono and John Gerhardson Review of Application Upon receipt of the approval of the Corps of Engineers and the Watershed District, the applicant proceeded with the dredging of a 60’x60 ’ pond in the street yard of his lakeshore property, not realizing that approval of the City of Orono was also required. Applicant had applied for a conditional use permit for the restoration of a guest house on his property in the summer of 1994. He continued to work on the restoration of the shoreline of his property receiving pemiits from the Watershed District for installation of a sand blanket and rip rapping of eroding shoreline. He expanded the permit with the Watershed District to include the excavation of the pond in the street yard and was also advised to proceed with the permit process with the Coips of Engineers. Applicant had also been in contact with the City for the past year dealing with the flooding problems of Kelly Avenue and the proposed realignment of his driveway. Driveway improvements involve placing of berms and plantings within the unimproved portions Zoning File ^1989 January 11, 1995 Page 2 of the Kelly Avenue right-of-way. Mr. Stoddard had unfortunately assumed that his contact with the Public Works Department had covered any other necessary local government approvals. The building inspector stopped the project and appropriate erosion control measures were taken. Applicant immediately filed the necessary conditional use permit. The area to be excavated is not a designated wetland and is located out of the proposed water improvements for Kelly Avenue, review Exhibit L. storm Gustafson reports that the proposed project will have no negative impact on proposed Kelly Avenue storm water improvements. The area to be excavated is not a protected wetland of either the City, State or Federal authorities. The pond will provide additional retention of runoff within the area. Gustafson cautions about proposed landscaping improvements within the unimproved ponion of Kelly Avenue noting that large boulders or trees should not be planted within the right-of-way. John Gerhardson will work with the applicant to ensure that right-of- way is protected. It is doubtful whether the 5’-I- high berms will be allowed but this must be resolved by the Public Works Director with the applicant. The pond will be approximately 60’x60’ and will result in the dredging of some 600 cubic yards of fill. The excavated fill shall either be used in the grooming of the sides of the pond and for the additional landscaping within the street yard of the property. Any remaining fill will be removed from the site. Issues for Consideration Applicant ’s addendum notes the p urpose of the creation of a pond is for aesthetics, retention of surface runoff and environmental as ue had been previously filled and is covered with purple loostrife. The Engineer confirms that the excavation of the pond will have no impact on the future storm water improvement plans for Kelly Avenue. 1. 2. Do Commission Members have any other concerns, i.e. safety, location of 6’ to 8 ’ pond adjacent to roadway, need for physical barrier? Any issues to address concerning the circumstances of the dredging of the pond without the necessary permit approvals from the City . . . Have Planning Commission Members any further questions to ask of applicant? 3. Any other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action Denial of conditional use permit. If conditional use permit is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in Section 10.09, Subd. 6(A). Zoning File #1989 Januar\' 11, 1995 Page 3 A. Does the proposal present conflicts with the standards set forth in the zoning code or the intent and purpose of the Comp Plan? B. Does the proposed improvement pose any hazards to the public health, safety or welfare or will it be detrimental to properties or improvements in the immediate neighborhood? C. Will the proposed improvement have a negative impact on the property values of the neighborhood? Approval of the conditional use permit as proposed subject to the following conditions: A. Applicant to obtain an after-the-fact land alteration permit from the City. B.Entire disturbed area within the private property and right-of-way of Kelly Avenue to be seeded in the spring. #1CITY OF ORONO - GENERALTTA^D ife^APPLlCATI A w* w* Vc V' V'V V 6. ’ roi V J. C’V . t •-•A A 4.V»V' • PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address________— Type of Application to be Filed -----— Prcpert>' Identification Number (P.I.D.) .APPLICANT. Name_____ Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_______ C ----- Address A-ucmuc ■:,, T- } 3 -14 00^ z f*Lr*i*11 i.vvi i\01 » A i»'• — A Ji.-' S.V * :i?!22i00 COOl i<0 Phone (home) V^/2) ^ 7/* ^0^ Phone (work) f Un) T* 2:ip Phone (home)_ Phone (work). _ City Zip. Date Properrv Acquired I I (doXl^o^) also o'A/ (month/year) FEES - application 5125.00 Residential Accessory Use ^ ^ 5200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ~ S175.00 Guest Hcuse/Guest Apartments 5150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg " $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use TC~ $200.00 Land Alteration „ i • Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain “A” Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore “p^/PID - see Fee Schedule • x $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) ---------After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , r \ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) " $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). REQU^D SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Descnbe request in detail. 1. 2. I / lC4Uta*. uj uviuw. , 1. • . • f r Cemtied Propert>- Owners List of owners within 350 (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department ot Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-j271). 5- r,n ha Cenificate of Surv'ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. . 6. ^A) hVx, Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. 7 yy Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve y^hanges in elevation (grades). _ 8 t/ List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 9. fjfi' Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 10. H/j^ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. YOU ARE required TO SLTPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCL^IENTS OR COPY FOR^P^DLCTON (U " X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to e submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Depanment that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;^__________________________----------------------------------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . u .k 7«n5nc The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zonmg Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incuaed in review of this application, and certifies that the information • • - ^ the b0groT\his/her know ledge. Applicant ’s signature y ^ ~ ~ OWNER’S SIGNATURE . ., The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorize entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of^vesti^ariCrrynd verification of this request. owner's signnrure _Az_^2 _________JldMl------------- Applicant must have all subtmnals into the City otTices 25 days before the Planning Commission Jl^n^ Commission Mcetmgs arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at - review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled »• pleSrrie^Ligements to have an authonzed agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zonmg Office of this change prior to the meeting. William J. Stoddard O O ' o Jf 5S^- 3.>' December 19, 1994 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Department City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Subject:Lund Use Application at 2605 Kellv Avenue Dear Jeanne: From your field inspector's visit and our follow-up meeting this morning, we now understand we were a permit shy in order to proceed with the excavation at my residence, due to miscommunication. VVe had already obtained Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Department Of The Army/Corps Of Eng-neers Permits, and I was informed that "all other local parties had been informed about this matter." In addition, 1 had been communicating with Mr. John Gerhardson of Orono (refer to enclosed correspondence) about this and related street flooding maters, and I erroneously assumed that I had satisfied City of Orono policy. This mix-up is entirely my responsibility, and enclosed with this letter, please find a General Land Use Application and required information for your review. In summary, last winter we applied for lake shore permits for rip-rapping and a sand blanket from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). These permits were granted and work was performed by an approved contractor. At that time following conversations with the MCWD, we applied for and were granted permits from the MCWD and Corps of Engineers for excavating a portion of my property near Kelly Avenue for reasons of aesthetics; environmentalism, (fill had previously been placed in this portion of this property years ago, and now is home primarily to the exotic "purple loosirifc;" and water storage (water routinely floods Kelly Avenue at this location). It is our intent to complete e.xcavation as soon as possible (1/2 day of work) and to have a pretty pond that doubles as a water retention area to help with spring flooding on Kelly Avenue (which makes it virtually impossible to even access our driveway at time' ind for local traffic to pass. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. .Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612)471.8088 Fax: (612) 471-0888 0 r Ms. Jeanne Mabusth December 19, 1994 ft 3rl X ] ,P *“ ^ f & No hardcover is affected by our proposal, and please refer to the attached Land Use Application and attachments for additional site specific information. We look forward to discussing this further with you. 1.» ■ w !mrun' date . o«/ivh cm :o 11 OOOA »: A00R^1 q2S»5^*!>IY0IAR0 AVE f ER NAMgLP I'-EJLENOX ' ^TAXPAYER ^NAME/AOOR t$. RT^ 1 :Vh -t A*:.'.*• ii T.f- »r MADE r i PHILIP.1 ELIZABETH LENOX <J %PROP‘ADDRl^;d,02525^*;<SHADYHOOO RD ) R|U.O»t«ER NAME DEANNA H LEACH <• . j|KNAME/A0Dit«tt'2215‘KENN00D'HAY ;1 ' HAYZATA;»t4 fv, SSSTl ! ’■' '*^^0»^R NAM eM'J R'A'S'L VOLKHAR . • U }Ip70HNER NAHE^^t J R' A'S ll^JAXPAYER if7.r JOHN R I ^ KEL ‘1 ------------------ SHERRY L VOLRHAR KELLY AVE IN' 55531 ,r ,» 0020 , PROP-AOOR i 01565^ KELLY AVE iOHNER NAHEr^VALEDA.C BURCH • 4 , % Lmom ‘ f W11j%*» OwlW^fi • Jfj£rAXPAYER>»T-ULEOA C BURCH i 7'»iNAME/ADD r K1'258S KELLY AVE ■^4 PROP AOORi'.'^IOEASS-'^^ KELLY AVE , ilVi^OWER NAME-C'ljj H.EUCSTER ACM EUGSTER ^"'^TAXPAYER.<iiv>:*'jACK EUCSTER/CAROL M EUGSTER ' I * .V. V < * • .. .*» COUNTY PROPERTY PROPERTY•’ ' f 58 20- 02560 KIRK K NELSON KIRK K NELSON 2560 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 fjp^ (3U *v ..Tfi-0 (39) .) # *> V / V ^ ** ^ C28) A i- . c "(7V O (i) '\f ••. .• "•. • I 7/ 05)^ ^"■"1-/ c‘)^i 402 \Arr VACAl W §s O o ONO, MINN 9. # 9 -P-S^ ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. BUI Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 KeUy Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we arc in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Jiyy/ Printed Name: t'/r^ /i Ji^.7/ Z‘ ^^ ^ / X,.' - • Signature:. Address:/^^^. ^ Jl.Sc/S d^^nJe^ sSf/. ^ ' /■- ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water r»' ention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. n 1 y Signature; Printed N^e: \ P' \\ \j ^ I A— Address: - ' /T >\/ f\ P-1 t ACKNOWLFDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creck Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orooo Pcnnit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: Printed Address: AiT ? S' I ly |S / ^ P -i* ■p-f ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: Printed Name • & >^ r Address: A '7 ( / ^ ACKNOWLEDGMENT p. As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The ^y/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature Printed Name: Address: Mrs. Leoaon R. BtIteteU 2587 KeilrAv* Excelsior kOf 55331 ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature:. Printed ^ iSTf ft Address:^^ P.3^ ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue confonns to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. PY William J. Stoddard January 9,1995 Mr. Edward Callahan, Mayor Orono City Council Members Orono plannin g Commissioners P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Subject:Land Use Application at 2605 Kellv Avenue Dear Orono Officials: This is just a friendiy note to you in the event you have wondered about die pile of dirt in front of our home, and to update you prior to our upcoming Plaiming Comnussion meeung on our proposed pond. We now understand we were a permit shy in mder to proceed with the excavation at my residence, due to my miscommumcauon We ^d already obtained Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnct and Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers Permits, and I was informed that "all other ^ been informed about this matter." In addition, I had been commumcaung with Mr. John Gerhardson of Orono about this and related street floodmg maters, and I erroneously assumed that I had sausfied City of Orono policy. This imx-up is entirely my responsibility, and we have subsequenUy furnished the City a Land Use Applicauon for your review. granted permiis from the MCWD and Corps of Engineeis for egcavaung the pond for reasons of aesthetics; environmentaiism, (fiil had pteviousiy been piaced m this portion of this property years ago, and now is home primariiy to the exotic "purple loostnfe; and water storage. We are very hopeful that this proposal satisfies yourself. City policy, and shows that we are trying to do something which is helpful to Orono and its taxpayer^. Even though we did not quite fully comprehend Orono’s permit system to-date, we look forwwd to a mutually beneficial decision permitting us to complete the 1/2 day of required work. Sincwely, Williqm J. Stodd 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: 16I2) 471-8088 Fa.\: (612)471-0888 William J. Stoddard April 29. 1994 K COPY Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 .-r.r. sr.. _ ^rr r • • Subject: Dear John: Continued Water Problems on Kellv Avenue C"'I. John, I must say 1 had hoped that the water problems on Kelly Avenue would have been taken care of by this spring. I understand you do not have the resources to fix every problem which pops up from time-to-time. but the flooding on Kelly Avenue is a reoccurring problem. The water is now over one foot deep by my mailbox and driveway entrance. In addition to the marsh which is the source of this water, the storm sewer adds water to the problem periodically, as evidenced by water streaming from the top of the manhole. I hope you will devote your attention to remedy the problem by raising the road in this area as soon as possible. I have enclosed a copy of my letter to you from last summer. I have been very patient with your efforts to date. I wonder how patient Orono’s "tax collector" is? In addition, I intend to change the course/elevation of my driveway and it would be very helpful to know your decisions an ' anticipated dates for follow-through. Please review my concerns and let me know when you will take care of the flooding problem. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or if I may be of assistance. My day number is 595-888S. 260^ Kcll\ Avciuio Okmio. Minnesota 5.^.'.^! I clcphinic: (012» 47 1 .SO.SN Ha\ (f>l 2) 47 1 -OSSS © William J. Stoddard April 29. 1994 Orono City Council Mr. Charles Kelly 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake. MN 55356 JJ^ SJ ■t >5 « Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear Council Member: I would like to sincerely request your help in obtaining the resources for the City of Orono to raise the road on a portion of Kelly Avenue which is annually flooded. The water on the road in front of my house is well over one foot deep. I am sure you do not wish to hear repeated problems associated with this flooding, however, I have enclosed two letters to the City Public Works Department which summarized numerous conversations and no results to-date. Our beautiful City of Orono contains many great roads and I am proud of the way they are maintained and the results of our Public Works Department. I feel they should be commended for a great job done overall. Unfortunately, the flooded part of Kelly Avenue which is adjacent to my home makes it impossible for certain vehicular traffic to my home. I encourage you to drive on it soon and formulate your own opinions. In the mean time, I place my hopes and confidence in your hands. Please review my concerns and let me know what you can do to help. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or if I may be of assistance. My day telephone number is 595-8888. Sincerely, William J. Stoddard cc: Mr. Edward J. Callahan, Jr. 2605 Kelly Avenue OioiUL Minnesofa 55.'*^! Telephone <612) 471-SOSS l*a\ (612) 47|.(ISSX © Mr. John Gcrhardson May 16. 1904 Please review our concerns and let us know if there is anything else we may do to help you take care of the water ponding problems. rf V X itJ % ...» vl H W illiam J ShnUarJ Mav 16, 1994 Mr. John Gerhardson Public ''-^o ks Director City of Orono Crystal Bay. MN 55323 #1o O O Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear John: Per our la- t discussion you requested me to summarize various problems we’ve encountered with the water problems on Kelly Avenue for your report. As one of the main projierty owners affected due to my driveway access, I urge expedient road repair before someone is injured due to faulty car brakes which are affected tremendously when iit iven through one foot of water. This can potentially result in a huge liability to Orono of which you knew of previously, however haven't yet remedied. -Cars have stalled in the middle of the road for hours; -Our newspapers get randomly delivered, and then usually wet. I can only retrieve it with my vehicle; -Our »^ail is wet every day and sometimes illegible due to cars splashing it; -Oui d gets wrecked from both water ponding and cars driving over our property tryin^ avoid as much of the pond on the road as possible; -Three instances have been reported to me plus my experience of nearly having an auto accident because our vehicles brakes have been affected from driving through the water. The brakes get so saturated, that it takes nearly four times the distance to stop. By this letter, 1 am notifying you of your party to this danger and liability; -On one occasion, a tow truck was necessary to remove a vehicle stuck in the mud in my yard as they tried to avoid the road; -Water has entered more than a few cars from the door sill of visitor*^ Sometimes they do not even attempt to come up my drive, either electing to park at my neighbors, or not stop altogether; -I have witnessed over 100 vehicles elect to make a U-tum in the middle of the road than to drive through the water. As you can see, this is not only a nuisance, but what I believe a potentially huge liability for the city of Orono. Please take my comments constmetively, as I believe there are a number of really good things the Public Works department is involved with. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612)471-8088 Fax; (612)471-0888 1 i © COPY July 14 1993 Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 #19 Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear John: It was a pleasure speaking with you today about our problems with the standing water in front of our homes on Kelly Avenue. As we said, the warm, dry season doesn’t appear to be coming which has somewhat taken care cf this problem in past years. Instead, there has been up to one foot of standing water in tlie road which has resulted in cars getting stuck in an attempted "shortcut" over my lawn, resulting in tow trucks ripping up more of my yard. We cannot get to our mail boxes except by four wheel drive, and on one occasion, guests had their car flooded as the water came up over the sill in their car door, resulting in a sprained ankle when abandonment was necessary. 1 could go on but my intention is not to gripe, but to hopefully propose and be part of the solution. In our discussions, I understand a costly alternative consists of a storm sewer which would mean both allot of time, and money assessed to homeowners. I would like to propose a quicker, less costly fix which would consist of raising the road slightly in the affected area. Please review our concerns and let us know if there is anything else we may do to help you take care of the water ponding problems. Sincerely, William J. Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono, MN 55331 N wmutrnj. Stoddard September 27, 1994 Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 #1 COPY oV 1 V i ^ 1 Subject: Dear John: Landscaping & Driveway Improvements at 2605 Kelly Avenue Per our previous discussion you requested me to submit a preliminary sketch for my roadside improvements. I inter.'! to make various improvements for safety as well as aesthetic reasons. By relocating my driveway outlet somewhat, I will not be driving directly into the roadway pond which comes and goes throughout the year. In summary, the work in the right-ol-way area will consist of re-locating the drive outlet, along with landscaping consisting of small rocks, binder-rock/mulch, some shrubs and hosta varieties and tulips. I intend to Place the closest landscaping no closer than ten (10) feet from the road (which is still farther from the road than most homes in the area) and keep safety in mind by not utilizing any large rocks. I hope my project meets with your approval, and you find it as pleasing as our neighbors and we do. Sinceivi , 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612) 471-8088 Fa.\; (612)471-0888 ^0 \ f ; 3 % . «% . # VI SV1'"" iV \ , • C ••V:.Ly. • -4’ View towards road with recommended compensation area to the left, and water ponding area wetland across Kelly Av'enue. V w;' ' >'I .*> •• • N. i . . : ' . ' 'TV ^ Ay " •1^': ^ - . fin #A.n-------^*. r.tti • 'h " ' .r •* • ■V-‘ >i: • ••■; ’ •■ 'J‘ ••• • ■ • J .# ••‘Vy^-V Close-up of water ponding area/wetland across Kelly Avenue. STORM WATER DRAINAGE Sf.nit In f«8' ORONO, MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE # L -sI OGURE_l^ ‘O r Boneftroo Roeeno Andarllk & Associates mjJL _ Premier Bfui • ■ '* wtiiip n» AM Avrtjt If • Ri7''?-v-7;oo 1; ^rr:^ nks if if^i < ‘.V J •’V c**' *7 M/IM * ‘l'» '^Of A *‘''.IO<l ^.«HFn f PIC July 19. 1994 >C 301 cfntmm .‘..r^n'C (Tv*^* .» MM 5'1 9 nr mi Ttv» w MK'»»*wv,> *r. wj^4 vmr MM ssm eir.fvi »«ivii riAi iM»Mf» WH»n? Bf AH I AKf VN 551 1* AT 'An*) I-dler of Credit #365 Issued ill 6i\or or Minneliaha Creek Wa'erslied Dish id 14600 Minnelialia P.vd. Minnetonka, MN 55435-1597 Attn: Cllen Somes Dear Ms. Somes; Premier Bank hereby establishes its letter of credit in your favor for the account of William J. Stoild.ird in the ayeiegate amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred dollars (S2,500v00) available bv vour iliafts shown at sight on Premier Bank.. • Premier Bank hereby agrees with bonallde holders that all drafts drawn under and in . • compliance with the terms of this credit shall be duly honored on presentation and delivery of doi.'Minents as specified t<» the drawee if drawn and negotiated on or before July 19, 1995. The aggiegaie aiiHiunt «lr;uvn on this crcilii shall not exceed $2,500.00. Tliis credit becomes void if not used on or before July 19, 1995. Your negotiations of any draft or drafts under this letter of credit shall be considered a guaranty to Premiei Bank and that the terms and conditions expressed llierein have been. •, fulfilled. •“ •• • •• • V* .• • •. * Unless otherwise espiessly staled. Uiis letter of credit is Subject to the Uniform Customs a'"J Practice for l)ocnmentai y Credits. I.C. Publication No. 500 (1993 Revision)- (Note * for the purposes of ap[>lying said UCP Standards, Premier Bank shall be governed by the reflations applying to Issuing banks). . Sincerely, // • . •. • I t* . .Sean O. Regan ' President, Premier Bank Roseville SOR/pm ‘ * * * *• • •• MlNNtinAaM WATERSHED DISTRICT 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597 fiffOO' offic»; (f 12J «W»« »•« <•’*) 93*^** DOTWCT WafBNSTTIATOB: f'i«'« Sr"«* DOJUIO or Thjn** fchiJi#. . P'W • C WoccfcwU"W*Jcr*'iE TTwfras OMkaon Lw*e^ • TNjmas W Lafiowty • ^r\» S Harf>c «Patr.ciaG. 25c July 25, 1994 , »• Mr. Williaa Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono, MM 55331 •.A . JT jL Dear Mr. sroddard: At th. BCheduled p"”pU:TV^«ru H»Pig«r8. the Board reviewed ywr property to pieced elon, be coapleted in association with pemit nunber 94 21. JSSirid t“ Bubmit e letter ot credit in the anount of $2,500 to insure the completion of the work. Please contact he should you have any questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, Ellen B. Sones District Administrator c:Jim Smith, Concept Landscaping DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL OfiTWCT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS ARMY CORPS OF ENGWEERS CENTRE 190 FIFTH STREET EAST ST PAUL, MN S5101-1630 September 16, 1994 TO ATTCMTlON Construction-Operation* Regulatory (94-05621-NW-JJY) Mr. William Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 v; a T AV \ 1 Dear Mr. Stoddard: We have reviewed information about your project to dredge 0.08 acre from an unnamed wetland to create a compensation area. The project site is in the ME 1/4 Sec. 20, T. 117N., R. 23W., Hennepin County, Minnesota. This work is eligible for authorization by a Department of the Army nationwide permit referenced below and described in the enclosures, provided the enclosed conditions are followed. This determination covers only your project as described above. If the design, location, or purpose of the project is changed, you should contact us to make aur"? the work would not result in a violation of Federal law. It is your responsibility to ensure that the %#ork complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE WORK. If you have any questions, contact Mr. Joe Yanta in our St. Paul office at (612) 290-53C2. Sincerely, w- - Ben Wopat ^ Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosure(a) Determination: 33 CFR 330-Appendix A (26) Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 6, 1995 Bonesmxj noarrf Anaefi-n jna Auocjiei. me |«| Otto G Bone«»DQ Aooen W PE ’ jo^eon C Ande^A PE Marvm L Sorvaia PE E Vnef PE Oi^nn ff Coosi PE Tho»hjs E No^ PE BoO^ G PE Sui^ V* Ehe^'p' C PA •Senior C:>nsu»t^ HOMta A SanM PE Ke»th A GortJtyi PE Booert P P^"A^»e ^E Penaro W Poster PE OjvkJ O LosiotJ PE »oee*T C PusieA a i a jeny A Bourdon PE A Mjnion PE VKhjr T Rautminn PE A F*e«o PE P Aryjefson A ' A OoraKJ C Burg^rdi PE ^homjs A Syfto PE P*ede^ J Stenoorg. PE VarTinez PE Mch^ P Pau. PE >^joes M Png, A :C P Thomas W ^tenon PE Whae* C lyr>c^ PE James P MaufxJ- PE jerry O Aprtzsch PE Scott J ArgjneA. PE Aenreth P Anderson PE Mar* P PoPS PE Mar* A Seta PE Gry W Monen PE Paul J Garmon A i A Dar^te- J Edgerron PE * Pk* Schr*«dl PE Phitto J CasiAteri P£ Mar* O VWams. PE Miles 8 Jensra PE L Pha*o Gawei PE Karen L Wiemen PE Gary D K^stofte PE *e^ P Tapp PE Douglas J Benort PE Shaw*n O Gustafson PE CecAO Oirvier PE Pam G Heuer PE jorm P Goroer P£ Charles A ErK*sos Leo M Pavversky Marian M Oson James E EngeihafOf Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Stoddard Pond File No. 139-1989 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposal to create an open water pond at 2605 Kelly Avenue. It d«s not appear that this location is a wetland. The applicant has received a^rovals from both the Mh^nehaha Creek Watershed District and the Corps of Engineers. The proposed p^nd t a«";Lble from an engineering srand^int Tie pond will have proposed drainage improvements in the area. The applicant proposes to place up to 5 feet of fill with landscaping within the City ’s right-of-way for trees or structures of any kind should be placed within the ^ht-of-way. The bem enmorchLnt must be approved by the Public Works Director. The enure disturbed area should be seeded in the spring. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. i). Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc;John Gerhardson, Public Works Director 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 SU SJHVIV bonomcnt wMkfiD VD.'-rER 18407*\DRAFT f '' XT PONT ON UNE of \o'^or (jO/90 (i^iUf/nwUO V* FOUND 1* IRON Pipe wi/j V* ' Mdipc* r UAfTA •> •> ttf«f TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: Januar>' 18. 1995 SUBJECT: B-2 Amendment - Revised Draft (. i4.<of Exhibits A - Revised Draft B - Memo and E.xhibits of 1/4/95 % Council spent forty-nine productive minutes reviewing the proposed B-2 amenument at yod? January 9th meeting. Per that discussion, the following revisions have been made: • Subd’vision 1 - Cross out "commercial" in line 4. • Subdivision 2 - Add definition of "charter boat". • Subdivision 6(C) - Add "large assembly" license and "special event" permit requirement for fishing tournament accessory use. • Subdivision 6(I)/Subdivision 7 - Change "one caretaker dwelling unit" from accessorv- use to conditional use. • Subdivision 7 - Typed in previously penciled-in reference to Section 10.09 re: CUP standards. • Subdivision 7 - Eliminate proposed "Lake/lake structure maintenance operations base" and "Snowmobile sales and service" from proposed list of conditional uses. • Subdivision 8 - Add item "I" to parking requirements, regarding potential inadequacy of minimum parking requirements. • Subdivision 11 - In item "E", relocated "for retail sales and service functions"^for clarity, and added "non-tournament" to clarify fishing activity and "non-charter" to clarify private use. • Subdivision 15 - Eliminated reference to boat slips, boat buoys and docks per City Attorney ’s recommendation. • Subdivision 19 - Corrected the word "Department" to read "District". Council confirmed its intent that conditional use permits not be granted unless landscaping is in compliance. As intended, staff would work with each marina to devise a proposec ’ landscape plan for Council approval, establishing schedules, etc. against which to determine "compliance" on a yearly basis Request for Council Action Please review the revised draft and direct staff how to proceed. Options include: - Direct staff to make specific additional revisions and prepare ordinance for adoption. - Table for further di.scussion. - Other, ch m•Tni.WTiK Rinri ^■nti >■ < ■ iiral lAiini •liio Iic^l \9mnl ^mm ^XoMiSj III I MT^I~I D. On-land storage of boats, winter and summer. F.. Marine fuel sales. F. Bait and fishing tackle sales._ Suhd. 6. Accessory Uses. Within anv "B-2" Lakeshore Business District, the following u«;es shall be permitted a ccessory uses: A. ■’Sign*;. Signs as regulated in this chapter. R. Boat head numpout/ sanitary boat waste dumping facility. r Fishing tnnmaments. subject to the "large assembly" license reauiiements nf 5;prfion 5.25 and/or the "special event" permit requirements of Section 6.08, food includes only n Sale of pre-packaged foods or food from vending machines . Prepackaged _____________ food which has been professionally prepared at a locat ion other than on the ibises and does not include "full-course meals" or a nv food preparation other than warming .^ use of an infra-red or micro-wave oven. Sale of food troni vending machines is allowed ^. F. Dive shops. F Clubhouse (assemhlv/lounge/kitchenette area for use bv slip rental or "boat club" customers only). G. Lessons/teaching (sailing schools, etc.). H. Rental of boats. I. Sailboard sales/rental. J. Ice boating sales/rental/service a nd operations base. K. Ice fishing tackle sales. L. Cross-country ski sales/rental/service. Subdr^ Subd. 7. Conditional Uses. No conditiona l use permit shall be j^ran ted unless the property is found to be in compliance with the lan dscaping and screening requirernei^ of this Section. All conditional use permit applications shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.09 of this chanter. Within any "B-2" Lakeshore Business Distnct, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: ’iM A. Sole of cigarettes. Rnat Cluhs (time share). Applicant shall demonstrate that adequate parking is available on the site. B. Sale of 3.2 boor or sale of "set ups’’. (Subject to licensing by Council.) Public boat launching. On-Demanci (On~d£mand launching of customer~ovvned boats stored on the business site). Applicant shall demonstrate that adequate parking is available on the_site^Approval shall be subject to LMCD permit for such use, but CTitv shall not be oblisated_to approve such.use if approved bv LMCD when parkin2 is inadequate. C. Sale of -pfepackaged food or food from vending machines. Prepackaged food includes only food which has been professionally -prepared at a location oth er thai>-w-the premises and do es not include "fiill course meats or any food preparation other than waiiiiing by use of an infra red or micro wave ov en. Sale of food from vending machines is allow ed-.- PuMk Boat Launching. Transient. (Launchina ot boats via a ramp or other means.for or,bv customers when such boats are not stored on the site). Applicant shall demonstrate_that adequate car-trailer parking is available on the site. Hours of operatio n shall be at Council discrgtio iL n Charter boat nort of call. A charter boat non of call shall be defined^ a location where a chaner boat mav nick up passengers other than the o wner or operatpr _M employees of the chaner boat, whether or not the chaner boat is normally berthed on the propegy ^ The City mav place appropriate conditions on a charter bo at port of call regarding minimum parkin,^ requirements, hours of operation, etc, as may be appropriate to protect public interest. Applicant ■shall demonstrate to rouncil that all such co nditions are met. F. One caretaker dwelling unit, subject to conditions and limitations for such use that mav be imposed bv the Citv Council. Subd. 5t Subd. 8. Parking Requirements. Within the "B-2" Lakeshore Business District the off-street parking facilities shall be sufficient to eliminate any traffic or parking congestion likely to be caused by the business conducted. The parking areas may ne^ not be paved, hut shall be provided with appropriate stormwater runoff qualitv/quantitv controls as m.ay he required in this chanter. The minimum parking requirements shall be as follows: A. Six parking spaces shall be provided for each ten boat slips on water or on land. B. At least eight off-street parking spaces, plus one additional space for each 800 square feet of floor area over 1,000 feet, including warehousing, and all outside sales and storage areas related to the sales and service functions. w C. If the proposed use is to include the launching of boats owned by the public for the day from trailers (i.e. Public Boat Launching, Transientl, ten additional auto-trailer parking spaces shall be provided for each ramp. n If the proposed use is to include a charter boat pon of call, one additional narking snace for each 3 seats of gross chaner capacity shall be provided, or a plan for off-sue parking and shnrtle <;ervice shnll he rrovided to the Citv subject to Council. ajBLQval. ^ The required parking spaces may not be separated by a public roadway from the dock, a storage space, mooring space, floor space, or ramp they are designed to serve. Required off-street parking space may not be utilized for open storage of goods or for the storag^of boats, except that from October 1 to Ma^ during the winter storage season each year, the required off-street parking may be used for winter storage of boats provided that '’0% of the required parking spaces remain as a functional parking area. During the transition senjns tAoril ^ Mnv 31 and September 16 to Novembe r 15), adequate parking shall_be maintained on the site, sufficient to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, but in no case shall parking be reduced to less than 20% of the required spaces, Fr Parking may not be allowed in any required yard or landscaping area. H Employee narking spaces shall be in addition to the parking spaces required above. The number of employee narking spaces shall be designated on an official parking plan to be kept on file with the City. T Where these minimum parking requirements Drove to be inadequate fora aivpn n«;e additional parking mav he required in order to continue that.use^ Subd. 6r 9^ Yards. The minimum required yard areas for the district shall be landscaped and planted with evergreen and deciduous shrubs and trees in accordance with a detailed landscape plan. .Storage of boats, vehicles, equipment and materials shall not be allowed withm.any required yard. Subd. ^ 10. Landscaping Areas. In addition to the landscaping required in the required yard areas for the district, the following landscaping areas shall be landscaped in accordance with the following provisions: A. The minimum landscaping areas shall be as follows: 1. The lakeshore landscaping area shall be an area that is parallel to the entire lakeshore adjacent to the licensed marina operation and equal to 10% of the average lot depth but in no case shall it be less than 10 feet nor more than 75 feet. Breaks in the landscaping area for access to the lake shall not exceed an aggregate width of 30 feet for each marina operation. 2. Side yard landscaping area shall be an area that is parallel to the side lot line and not within the lakeshore landscaping area or front yard landscaping area and shall not be less than 10 feet deep. 3. Front yard landscaping area shall be an area that is parallel to thf street or opposite the lakeshore landscaping area and shall not be less than 10 feet deep. Breaks in the landscaping area for access to the public road shall not exceed an aggregate width of 50 feet for each marina operation. B. The detailed landscape plan for each landscaping area shall provide for a natural woods area containing primarily evergreen and deciduous trees not less than six teet in height. Shrubs not less than two feet in height shall be inierdispersed among the trees so as to eventuallv provide, at manirity, a natural screen that will not be less than 50% opaque during the summer months. No uses shall be allowed in the landscaping area except the required landscaping and access roads. A privacy fence may be required in addition to the natural landscaping which has been planted to meet the requirements ot this district. The use ol any fencing shall not satisfy the requirements of providing natural landscaping and solid visual screening. Any yard area requiring landscaping to meet the requirements ot this district shall be planted with nursery stock, balled and bagged trees and shrubs. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition. C. All the required improvements in the landscaping will be completed prior to the date of issuance of an occupancy cenificate or as otherwise provided by this Chapter, whichever date occurs first. or other acceptable physical barrier ; D. All landscape areas shall be sufficiently delineated bv berming. curbing,. cf> as to eliminate the encroachment of vehicle parking, winter and summer boat storage, and other materials or equipment storage into the required landscape areas. F. All grnundcover in the required landscaping areas shall be natural living materials, such as grass or other planted groundcover. Decorative rockbeds and the like, whether or not lined with plastic, fabric or other weed inhibitors, shall constimte no more than 10% of the required landscape areas. Subd. &T iL. Additional Performance Standards. Within the "B-2" Lakeshore Business District any land use must meet the following performance standards: A. Suitable sanitary facilities connected to public sanitary sewer private on site sewage disposal system which complies with all applicable City Co de provioions and other agency regulations shall be provided on the premises for men and women, and further, suitable facilities shall be provided for the disposal of wastes accumulated in boats docked or serviced at the mnrin.T. including head pumpout facilities and a designated porta-pottv dump station.. B. Insofar as practicable, all means of access to the operation from any street shall be so located and designed as to avoid the routing of vehicles from the propert>’ over streets that primarily serve abutting residential areas. All access roads from the operation to any public paved roadway shall be paved for a distance of at least thirty feet adjacent to the public roadway to minimize dust and noise conditions. All access roads from the operation to any unpaved public roadway shall be treated to minimize dust conditions at least to the extent the unpaved public roadwav is dust controlled. C. Ttie Ail lighting on the premises shall be shielded so that no direct glare can be seen from adjoining residences, from the lake or from the roadway. D. The hours for running engines or operating any boat engine for the purpose of charaina batteries, running au.xiliary equipment or testing shall be between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Noise shall be limited per the provisi ons of the Zonine ChapteL E. The ma.ximum hours of operation for retail sales and service functions shall be 7 00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., for retail sales and-service functions, except as necessary to support normal (non-toumamenO fishing activity or private (non-charterj use of the boats stored on the premises, unless other permission is specifically granted by the Council. F. Persons in charge shall at all times keep the docks, sea walls, and premises in a neat and orderly manner and free from trash, rubbish, repair parts, machinery, equipment and debris of all kinds. G. Persons in charge shall prohibit the dumping or throwing of garbage, paper, bottles, cans, refuse or debris into waterway. Persons in charge of mooring area shall proviGc garbage cans of sufficient size to hold garbage or refuse to be collected. Dumpsters shaU. be screened so as to not be visib le ott-site. H. No commercial docks or boat buoys shall extend further into the waters of any lake than is reasonably necessary to accommodate the docking and mooring of such craft as shall customarily and lawfully be used on the lake or so as to interfere with, obstruct, or tend to obstruct, or render dangerous for use or passage a body of water within the primary harbor of the City. The length of docks and location of buoys shall be regulated by the City Code. All such commercial docks and wharves shall be constructed and maintained of such materials and of such type of construction as will not render them unsafe or likely to endanger public enjoyment of tne waters. The use of non-encased exoanded-bead polystyrene foam as a dock flotation material has been orohihited elsewhere in the municipal code.. Commercial docks shall be maintained m a neat and orderly manner at all times. I. If outside on-land boat slip (land) storage facilities are provided, the ooats shall be stored in such manner that they do not create a fire hazard. Any outside structures for purpose of storage of boats may not exceed 15 feet in height. On-land boat storage areas rnay not be located in the required yards or landscaping areas. i\ny gasoline offered for iqIc jtorert on the prcmi:c: shnll nontninorg os mav be required by the Council, and sueft tanl:c or container*- rmr«»H underground or such distance from the storage focilitiec co a: mH to create a dangi-T nnmmimhy- The premises shall at all times be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. J. Any gasoline offered for sale or stored on the premises shall be placed jo t.nnks or coptniners as mav be required bv the Council, and as required in Municipal Code Seetjon Q ^4 Such tanks or containers shall be stored in such a manner and location so as not to create a danger to the commupitv._ K. On-land boat density. 1 ■ Summer boat density. The number of boats stored on the premises for any and all reasons shall not exceed that number which can be safely stored in allowable locaiions while maintaining appropriate ingress, egress and emergency access to the site, as well as maintaining the required number of acceptable parking spaces. Boats shall not be stored in required auto parking spaces during the summer months (June 1 thru September 15). premises 2. Winter boat densitv/storage. The number of boats stored on the for any and all reasons during the winter season (November 16 thru April 14) shall not exceed that number which can he safely stored in allowable locations while maintaining ingress, egress and emergency access to the site, as well as maintaining the required number of winter parking spaces. 3. A site Plan designating the location of summer and winter boat storage shall he submitted for Council approval no later than three months after adoption of this section and shall require Council approval tor any future revisions. Subd.-9r 12. Area, Height. Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height. B. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: 1. Lot Area - 2 acres. 2. Lot Width Parallel to Lake - 200 feet. 3. Lot Width Perpendicular to Lakeshore - 200 feet. 4. Lakeshore Yard - 75 feet. 5. Side Yard -10 feet. 6. Front Yard Along Street - 30 feet. Subd. lOr II:. Setback, Hardcover and Tree Removal Regulations. All property in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District is subject to the requirements of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56. Shoreland Management. In addition, the following standards shall apply: A. Lakeshore Setback Regulations. The building setback from the shoreline shall be 75 feet. B. Setback to Residential. No operation or activities except for storage and parking may be conducted closer than 50 feet to the boundary of an adjoining property line which property is used for residential purposes. C. Setback Along Streets. No operation or activities except for storage and parking may be conducted closer than 50 feet to the right-of-way of any existing street, road or F highway. D. Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations. Within 75 feet of the shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent strucnires. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hardcover. E. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six i.iChes or more shall ^ removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. Tree removal and other vegetation management shall be in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56. Subd. Hr 14^ Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing floods, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant anv time a new use is applied for, whether through subdivision, variance, conditional use permit or building permit.__Such plans shall be provided in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council tor approval. Such stormwater runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Construction of facilities to manage the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff mav he required. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise, must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan^ Shoreland Management Regulations. Flood Plain Management Regulations, and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions, and is further subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. Subd. 13t 15^ Non-Conforming Use. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, any non-conforming use of land not involving a strucmre and any non-conforming use involving a structure with an assessor’s fair market value on January 1, 1975, of $3,000.(W shall be allowed to continue as a non-conforming use subject to the provisions as set forth in Section 10.03. Subd. Br Variances. Variances may be granted to the provisions of this Chapter in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 10.08. Subd. 14 t IX. Variances For Required Landscaping Areas. The Council may grant a variance allowing a four year installation and planting period to meet the requirements of the landscaping and planting provisions hereof, to any applicant who: A-:—Otherwise meets-all of the provisions of this Chapterr 8 hlj /T) ,7 _ ftr ^ Submits a detailed landscape plan showing sufficient planting and landscaping in each of the four years in order to prov ide at the end of the four years a natural screen that will not be less than 50% opaque during the summer months and not less than 25% opaoue in winter. Gr ^ Submits four year planting and landscaping plan which shall provide that in each year of the plan, at least 25% of the necessary landscaping and planting (as determined by the Council as of April 15. 1975 October 1. 1994) be planned, bonded and completed for each required landscaping area according to the other provisions ot this Chapter. The Council may vary' this requirement in order to allow a higher percentage ot the landscaping and planting in any required landscaping area and credit the applicant for the landscaping and planting which otherwise would be required in other landscaping areas. Subd. 15t 18^ Regulations Relating to Location. Construction, Installation-and Maintenance of Docks. Boat Mooring .\reas and Other Fi.x ed or Flooting Stnictures and Objects-on Lakes- Regulation of Strucnires Within the Lake. Adoption by Reference. The City hereby adopts by reference and makes a part of this Chapter as if ftilly set fonh herein, the following: Ordinanc^e No. 1 of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District as adopted on January 28, 1970; Amendment to Ordinance No. 1 as adopted on May 27. 1970 by the Lake Minnetonka Consorvation District! i\mendment No. 2 to Ordinance No. 1 as -adopted on April 28, 1971, by the Lake Minnetonka Conservat ion Districtr Chanter 11 of the LMCD Code as codified on May 27, 1988 including sections 2.0Q1 through 2.12 and subsequent amendments. The City expressly reserves the right to deny any variance to the provisions of Ordinance Nch-l Chapter II as amended, even though the same variance was granted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Subd. i&T Reference to Other Ordinances. Sections 10.10 through lO.^d are 10.41 is expressly conditioned upon the effectiveness of the Ordinances of the Lake Minnetonka Conser\'ation District pertaining to marina regulations and if all or a portion of such Ordinances are declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, no marina shall have a longer dock, more boat slips or more boat buoys than what was permined by the terms of that ordinance on the date it was declared invalid, or than was last approved by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, whichever is less. The City expressly reserves the power to be more restrictive in its regulation than the Lake Minnetonka Conserv ation District Ordinances if the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Orono so requires. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 4, 1995 ITEM NO.: Administrator Reviewed:Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assi. Planning & Zoning Administrator Item Description: B-2 Zoning District Amendment Agenda Section: Zoning Attachment Memo and Exhibits of 12/5/94 This item was tabled at your December meeting pending additional discussion. The existing language which was missing from "Subdivision 19. Reference to Other Ordinances" has been reinserted. The only other change since the 5/20/94 draft is the 9/9/94 CUP boilerplate language in Subdivision 7. At your December meeting, brief discussion occurred regarding whether Subdivisions 18 and 19,"referring to LMCD or other ordinances, should be updated as proposed, or merely deleted. Further, City Attorney Tom Barrett has recommended elimination of portions of the non- conforming use section. Subdivision 15. Councilmembers also questioned the addition of specific accessory and conditional uses. COL ’NCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff how to proceed with the B-2 amendment. Options include: Direct staff to make specific revisions and prepare ordinance tor adoption. Table for further discussion at a future Council meeting or work session. Other. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 5. 1994 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title As:istant Plannine & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: B-2 Zoning District Amendment Attachments: Memos and Exhibits of 11*23-94 and 9-8-94 Synopsis: The major changes proposed to the B-2 code are in 5 areas - Tk,-' rental’ added to list of Pennitted Uses. A ccestorj’ Uses section added, including some which currently occur at marinas, some not... List of, llowable Conditional Uses revised to reflect existing uses as well as potential new uses. Condition.; CUP approval on landscaping compliance, parking adequacy, etc. Minor revisions in the following areas: Parking requirements. - Stormwater controls. - Landscaping requi'^ements. - Reference to LMCD Code. - Ou-land boat density limitations. - General performance standards. The proposed lists of "uses " a.*- summarized as follows: Permitted N • Slip Rental P • Boat/Equipment Sales P • Boat Repair/Service P • Boat Storage P • Marine Fuel Sales P o Bait & Tackle Sales Acces-sorv N • Signs N • Pumpout N • Fishing Tournament C • Pre-packaged Food N o Dive Shops N • Clubhouse N ? Lessons/Teaching P • Boat Rental N • Caretaker Dwelling Unit N o Sailboard Sales/Rental N o Ice Boating Sales/Rcntal P o Ice Fishing Tackle N o X-C Ski Sales/Rental/Ser\'ice Conditional N • Boat Clubs N • On-demand Launching N • Transient Launching N • Charter Boat Port-of-Call N o Lake/Lake Maintenance Operations Base N o Snowmobile Sales & Service KEY: • Uses currently occurring at one or more Orono marinas o Uses not known to be currently occurring Status in current code; P - Permitted Use C - Conditional Use N - Not addressed in current code Additional Information: City Attorney Tom Barrett has suggested eliminating a portion of the non-conforming use section (Subd. 15). This section, in place since 1975. relates to expansion of number of.slips and buoys, and length of docks. It basically states that if a marina adds slips or dock length in excess of what City previously has licensed, equivalent removals must occur of portions of existing docks that are non- conforming. Staff agrees this wording needs to be either updated to reflect current LMCD codes, or dropped. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff how to proceed with the B-2 Amendment. m ^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: November 23, 1994 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: B-2 Zoning District Amendment The Mayor has requested this be placed on your agenda for discussion. Planning Commission and Council met in a work session on October 6 in regards to the proposed B-2 Amendment. No formal direction was given at that time. A copy of the September 8 memo and exhibits is attached for Council s review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff how to proceed with the B-2 Amendment, \1^ iC ^ A- I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 8, 1994 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: B-2 Zoiuiu District Amendment List of Exhibits A - Proposed Amendment B - Staff Memo 5/31/94 C - Kevin Staunton Memo 7/22/94 Background In 1993 Council directed Planning Commission to review and make recommendations regarding the B-2 Zoning District ordinances. Planning Commission has completed that review, resulting in the attached ordinance recommendation. Funher background regarding the content and process resulting in this proposed ordinance is provided in Exliibit B, and m the 1" thick blue- covered document compilation which Council received earlier this summer. Regulation of Operation (Uses! The proposed ordinance revisions incorporate a number of new uses which Council suggested should be regulated. The majority of recommended changes do in fact relate to the use oi the nropertv rath'er than the physical aspects of the property. Planning Commission concluded that rela.xin^ the lot area/width/setback/hardcover standards to match the reality of our existing marinas was not appropriate. Planning Commission did suggest that those marinas requestmg a conditional use permit for a use which they have not had in the past should be required to meet the landscaping requirements. Planning Commission rev iewed the proposed ordinance with Kevin Staunton. His memo addresses enforceability of the proposed code, and suggests that operational activities might be beuer regulated bv licensing. Perhaps the downfall of regulating by license m the past was a combination of encumbering the license with requirements to make physical changes o marina proper, and denial of licenses when that did not occur, but takmg no legal action nor imposing sanctions for noncompliance. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 September 8, 1994 B-2 Zoning District Amendment Rpoiilalion nf Physical Aspects (Hardcover. Landscapingl Perhaps a reasonable approach to gaining physical changes to the marinas would include the following: • Council to determine what general changes they would like to see in the physical aspect of all marinas. • Allow staff to then work with each marina to devise a plan and schedule for brin^inc each marina into an acceptable degree of compliance o> er time. w S • Bring this back to Council for approval. . Formalize an agreement with each marina, establishing schedules and sanctions for noncompliance. Such a program would perhaps avoid the -taking- issues raised by Staunton, would the Citv to reestablish a base line and set of goals for each manna that, when complted wtth, both the'marinas and the City will have retiched an acceptable comfon level. Options for Action Noting that the Planning Commission has held the required formal public hearings for this amendment, Council could direct staff to make any minor changes you want and place it on your agenda for formal ordinance adoption at your next meeting. • If Council wishes further Planning Commission input regarding the reasoning behind the proposed amendment, a work session with Planning Commission could be held, . If Council feels there are specific physical changes to the marinas which Council feels need to be dressed as a high priority, then hold a work session with staff to identify those issues and their relative priorities. • Other. TO: DATE; Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator May 31, 1994 SUBJECT: Section 10.41, B-2 Lakeshore Business District - Proposed Amendment List of Exhibits A - Proposed Amendment B - 1993-1994 Documentation Packet Background m C cv of Orono besan lioemina marinas in 1962. The B-2 Lakeshore Commercial District was crekted in Januar^ 1968, and standards and requirements for the distnct were adopted. . K r^»v^c^nnc ro the licensin'^ and B-2 District code sections occurred from 1969 to fpTr l^e cSe ™e cuSy in effect was adopted as pan of the 1976 zoning code revisions. Bv 1985 the Citv realized that cenain standards and requirements of the B-2 District wp'e not feLonablv t-nfoLable for e.sisting marinas. Use of licensing as a tool to force ^ hTzotS, 'smSards was found to be ineffective because, while the City refirsed to grant l.censes to cenain"marinas, it did not take steps to stop them from conimumg to operate. The Citv then attempted to redesignate n.arinas as a conditio^l use ra^er ttan a Tt, n o njctrirf This met with great resistance from the mannas. After two years or discussion followed by a three year drought in which lake levels ‘*™PP'^ marina activitv was hiuhlv reduced, the City Council appomted a Lake Use Committee m 1991 Planning Commission for their consideration. Review Process The attached proposed amendment to the B-2 Lakeshore Business District stantods fH^*^^^^^^ Citv Council in 1993, the Planning Commission held * ^ ^ within 350’ through April 1994. to which the public was mvited. All property own p, members of the B-2 Zoning District were maUed individual notices of the woik sessm . qj.quo’s of the public anended and offered comments at one or m.ore work sessions, and f Memo - Section 10.41 May 31, 1994 Page 2 seven marinn operations were represented at one or more meetings, and were given ample opportunity to provide input. •1 e nil ct-jff ind. meetin® minutes related to the B*2 amendiiient " .< •«“” -»» of the mailing list used. mw I . A,h nnhlic hearing notice has been published in the appropriate newspapers, and the ^rice and c^of ordinance amendments has been mailed to all property owners on the B-2 mailing list. Proposed Revisions Following is a brief review of each of the proposed revisions; . Subdiviston 1 -Bujin-ss" rather than "Commercial" District is proposed for consistency. V purpose statement ts broadened and generalized by minor wording revtstons. ■ "“'a defitlition of -Marina Business" is added to be consistent with the 1,cense provisions, of Municipal Code Chapter 5.43. * '"equiement that each marina business within the B-2 ^hore Business District obtain an annual license again is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 5.4a. * code lancuaae requires aU building permit applications in B-2 Dismet .0 be ri:“^:rb; ^tcouncu. T^e additional «itTcotb^l *c^-n« Committee as well as to the Plannmg Commission, and provides a code oasis of a Lake Use Committee. * TOfs°e=tfon reorganizes the "permitted uses" within the B-2 District. "Storage of boats" is exL sded to address borh winter and summer storage on land. perhaps ^ -Rental of in-water boat slips" is added as a permitted use . r^T^n-Sl^g os^ « fxra-i^n (sreTSri“'l8 ml W would provide sufficient controls to allow slip rental to become a permitted use. Memo - Section 10.41 May 31. 1994 Page 3 TOs section adds a long list of aUo-vable "accessory uses". The B-2 Zone is the only commercial or residential zone in Orono with no code allowance for accessory uses. The Plannin'T Commission reviewed each proposed accessory use m the context that it must be subsidiary to a permitted use. No accessory use can exist unless a perrmned use exists on the property One of the Planning Commission s primary concerns was that reasonable accesson ’ uses be allowed, and per the format of Orono ’s zoning code, uses not isted are not allowed ■ This resulted in a fairly long list of accessory uses which are relatively specific m scope, it also resulted in careful review of those uses which should be conditional rather than accessor}'• . Subdhnsimi^^^ ^ conditional uses, including boat clubs, cn-demand launching transient launching, chatter boat port-of-call, lake/lake structure mamtenance snowmobile sales/service. Planning Commission found that each of these uses may be a legitimate and reasonable activity at a marina within the B-2 Zone under cetum cireumstances Ihe r^on concern being adequate parking on the site. Note that all listed “ndmona, uses are proposed to be allowed only for marinas that are in compliance with the landscapin, ^"‘‘.“C‘XbX“.dzed as an alternative to individual boat ownership, that would expand the usage of a given boat with potential for increasing the percentage of boa's in use at the peak'times. A limit on the percenuge of boats at a given marina allowed tor boat club use was considered but not recommended. • ^ . On-demand launching of customer owned boats stored on the business onlv customer parking but boat/trailer storage space. It is perhaps Lm'cD will require licensing of non-rack storage space for such use although LxMCD does currently license rack spaces for on-demand launching. Agam, absent an in en the City to funher regulate numbers of boats on the lake, site congestion and provision of adequate parking are the main concerns. j .u* □ *7 - Public transient bo ’at launching via a ramp has historically parking requirements (Subd. 8) but was never listed as a permmed Adequate parking is the main concern, and Planning Commission suggests that CouncU be able to control the hours of operation. hm mav . Use of a site for a charter boat pon-of-call relies on adequate paring ; also have negative impacts on neighboring property owners. The P«>PO«d allows the citv to place appropriate conditions on this use to protect the p ....ions . p"coLtission aclwldged that a iake/lake structure base mav be a "necessaty evil", providing a location, for the less l^e maintenance activities to occur. The wotfing allows Council to limit such ooenitions at Council ’s discretion. cnhtpci of . Afiowing snowmobile sales and service as a condittonal use die considerable discussion by the Planning Commisston and some matma op Memo - Section 10.41 Mav 31. 1994 Page 4 Plannin.- Commission concluded that Ihe mem sale and service of snowmobUes may a re^Mble winter use for the marinas with the strong feelmg that snowmobile rental and using marinas as a base of operation for snowmobiling is not were rSjed as to the need for demonstrating and testmg snoivmobtles as part of a sales md se^ice activity Planning Commission concluded that negative aspects of such and service ac . existin<» codes remilating hours of operation, noise, etc. .2 ree7»d ctret: ^e'be^rdLinated from the list of allowed conditional uses. Sale of prepackaged food becomes an accessory use. • Subdivision 8 areas "need not be paved", but must have Sto™ if\dhered to. A requirement for one parking space for each three seats to be generally is added to provide a standard for that conditional use. ®”1mm 8(F) rteterL winter, summer and transition seasons, and requues main.enance of adequa” ptJnl "he transition seasons. This revision is intended to provide the marinas some degree of tlexibiliry m ,o required parking, at at least one marina site. . Subdvision^^^ clarification that storage of boats, vehicles, equipment niaterals is not allowed in any required impa/t ::: "mrmTL^'aTd^a70 ^r rn^omement needs to be developed for those properties which have not been formally approved for "required yard variances. ' “trctlon adds a requirement for a physical barrier to encroach 1-dscaping areas c[7 [m"eq-uiring "landscaping" is to provide green space, not rock beds. Subdivision 11 - . P Hjoenct is now sewered. ■ !^^”ptaZg SmZion S^ron^mcommended that - Item G is revised to require that dumpsters be screened. Memo - Section 10.41 May 31, 1994 Page 5 - Item H is a notation that styrofoam dock floDtion has been prohibited. Item I separates gasoline storage language from dry stack requirements. Item K is^intended to set reasonable limits on summer and wmter on-land boat density, bv'requirino developmem of a site plan for boat storage while mamtamtng appropriate ^ "’cc ^.m^raenev access to this sitc while mamtaimng adequate parking. SntirS prop'oid wording is that the marina operator will deal with an envelope r^er than a spLific number of allowed boats, since regulating boats by number rather than location has generally not been effective m the past. . Subdmsion 12 ^3,^ requirements, since ...... ”pgrad°Js.“'since the variance process would likely still be needed under a relaxed set ol standards. Subdivision 13 This section merely adds references to the Shoreland Management code requirements. • se"cll adds lanvuace requiring site and drainage plans upon any application ssrrsss'r regulations to those codes with which changes in grade must be m compliance. • ^“•’rtctL updates - rXence to LMCD’s code, the City would have no ordinance regulating docks. • ™ ss: .cs Memo - Section 10.41 Mav 31, 1994 Page 6 Tin- «Mrienced mixed success with landscaping upgrades by marinas using this The • P piannino Commission recognizes that marinas have had little incentive code sectmn m *e P^'indicated that incentives should be given ftinher roSatn%yi"a;proval to landscaping compliance may act as an incentive in some cases. ’ ^‘‘'’t''nme"d'in the Subdivision 15 comments. UMCD codes have been amended many times since th^ 1970 and ,971 ordinances referred to the B-2 Code. This section is mtended to update the reference to the LMCD codes. * ^“‘’™s'is"a minor revision to omit references to the B-1 through B-5 zoning districts, and replaces that reference with Section 10.41. the B-2 district, which is the only commercial dealing with marinas. Staff Recommendation proposed amendment. pnPHAM HATTC MEM<^RANDUM 3300 Rper Jaffray Tower 222 Soutb NioUi Street MinoeapolU. Minnesota SS^2 (612) 33^4800 TO:Mike Gaffron City of Orono FROM: RE: Kevin Staunton \lj^ Proposed Amendments to Zoning Code Section 10.41 B-2 Lakeshore Business District Standards - Enforceability Questions DATE:July 22. 1994 Attached Dlease find a revised version of my July 17. 1994 memorandum lo you regardinlle above-referenced maner. I have sUghUy revised my desOTpUon of ^ ^ Sns fvSlable to the City in bringing non-confotming uses into conformity with new regulations in an effort to make it less confusing. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. cc: TJBarrett 219/220519727/22/94 JUL 2 5 1994 env OF ORONO 3300 Rper Jaf&ay Tower 222 SouUi NinU) Street Minn<^pnH«, Minm»snta SS402 (612) 333-«00 TO: FROM: RE: Mike Gaffron City of Orono Kevin Staunton Proposed Amendments to Zoning Code Section 10.41 B-2 Lakeshore Business District Standards - EnforceabUity Questions DATE: July 17, 1994 (Revised July 22, 1994) I am writing in response to your memo to Tom Barrea regaidmg the above-referenced raaner Your memo expresses concern regarding the enforceability of the proposed a.nendments to section 10.41. You have sought our advice about how to tot accomplish the ^bstS goals in the proposed amendments given the fact that many existmg m^as m the City of Orono conduct toiness acUvities or use their land in ways conaary m the proposed amendments. This memo is designed to respond to your eiriorcement address an issue regarding what is the most appropriate regmatory vehicle for each of the changes proposed. L ENFORCEABILITY The fast issue raised by your memo is the City’s abiUty to enforce ^y of the dirges being contemplated. Specifically, you are concerned about the ability to , thesi amendments against marinas that have been operating for manner that would be contrary to the new amendments. As a general matter, the C ty to enforce the new amendments even on marinas that have been lime in a manner that would be contrary to the new amendments. The red issue ^ how the may “eat preexisting nonconforming uses that weie lawful pnor to adopuon of the amendments. Preexisting non-conforming uses that were lawful prior to the regulations rendering them unlawful may be treated in one of three be allowed to remain or continue. Under this option, the property own chaneed continue the nonconforming use of the property indefimtely so as ^ expanded, or intensified. The theory behind this opuon is t^ bv fire gradually be eliminated through normal wear and tear, obsolescence, or 219/22051413 7/22i94 the elements or natural disaster.* Second, the use may be eliminated by requiring lawfully nre-existin® nonconforming uses to immediately come into compliance with the new regulations! Whether that requirement results in a "taloEg- wiU depend on the particular circumstances. Third, nonconforming uses may be eliminated over a period of time through amortization. This mechanism requires a nonconforming use to terminate after a prescribed period of time elapses. The prescribed period of time under such a mechanism must be s^ficient to aUow the property owner to recoup his or her investment in the nonconformin ao use. As mentioned above, the City may force a particular property owner with a preexisting Lmce an emting marina may have so Uttle remaining open space that it is ^possible to fit the required number of parking spaces on the open space on the prope^. Requiring strict corapUance with the requirements of the new provisions of the code would make ^e manna ineUgible for a conditionai use permit, thereby forcing the property owner out of busmess and probably triggering a "taking” claim. Conversely, an existing marina may have sufficient space for the parkmg stt^ required by the new regulations. Under such circumstances, the ra^a would be ab e to comply wi* the new regulations and obtain a conditionai use permiL An Mgument that the propel had been -taken" would be considerably less persuasive under such circumstances. Because the consequences of bringing preexisting nonconforming marina uses into corapUance are so dependent on the cL-cumstances of the particular manna, we “ approach that reserves for the City the flexibUity to deal with me« ^ ® c^-by-case basU. Ilie simplest way for the City to enhance its flexibiUty is to t^ow variant to the condiUonal use permit scheme created by the zonmg code amendmeiits. By aUowing variances to the condiUonal use permit requirements in ca^ "‘l™ those requirements would visit a parUcularly hmsh hardship upon the avoid -tiring- the property. In each case, the City can decide which of the three appr^hes ouUined above is the most effecUve way to ultimately elimmate WiU aUow the City to aggressively enforce the zonmg amendments m curumstaiic^ where UtUe. U any, hartUlup wiU be suffered wtule also avoiding unnece^ takmgs claims by granting variances for those marinas that need them to stay in business. ■As you know. Orono's code has provUions relating to the property owner may rebuUd and continue a nonconforming use after destnicuon by fire. elements, or natur ’ disaster. 219/22031413 7/22/94 ^ V * IL appropriate reglxatory vehicle TTie second issue that comes to mind as I review the proposed amendments U whether iU not C^ge fromly to day. For instance, the type of busing to be conductei '^cuSd“id‘*e “sL°ofTart goals'wWch cm oS^ be mols available to ty ^ „se penults allow a City to designate certam types of Sd .L" wIL'a district bLed upon the appUcanfs satisfaction of ceruin Standards and criteria articulated by ordinance. iKe. of land that ini«>ht change from day to day. on the other hand, need not be Uses of land tn « include the specific activities that are conducted on regulated by the zoning code. Su jit. the general nature of the SC “ oXtd."™^^^ reguIaL tluough a Uce.nsing scheme pursuant to the City s pohce powers, is nothing'improper about including “ *““'^§Sve°“thrCi^ more flexibility in E£St srrorg isi/:^toSShr"v licensing provisions.) CONCLUSION I hope Lhis informadon is helpful. 1 would be happy to come »« visit with me Planning Commission as it considers these amendments. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. cc; Thomas J. Barrett 219/22051413 7/22/94 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 26, i995 ITEM NO: ^ V Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse I ^ /City Administrator ’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Kelly Avenue Drair,age Attached is a feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer identifying several options for addressing the drainage problem on Kelly Avenue and identifying the costs of each option. The City Engineer will discuss the drainage problem and the alternate solutions at the Council meeting. Staffs recommendation is that, from a cost and impact standpoint, the lift station option is the best option for the storm drainage. In addition, the feasibility report includes raising Kelly Avenue one foot. This would reduce the number of times, and length of time, the road is under water. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Provide direction to staff regarding preferred options for addressing the Kelly Avenue drainage problem and the level of costs acceptable to the Council. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers A Architects Bonestrrx Rc^ene Anoeruk sna Aiioostn. me s jn AfS/rrwovr AcDcn/Equjt Oppomgity Emti jyrr 030 G Bor^«3Xi Pt ttobcfi W scsene PE • joseon C Arv3e»%e PE Mjrvm L Sorvaia PE p<*^afd E Turner PE Ge''" P Coo*L PE r^<>mai E Nie^i PE Pooen G k»^ur»<r»L PE Susan M Ebenjf> C PA January 20, 1995 Mcwvard A Sanfbid PE l^rtp A Gordon PE Rooer: ft PS fherj/a W Foster PE Oavro O U?s«tofa PE Pcoe'T C Russet A i A .e"'. * Bouraon PE Mart A Hanson PE ^^K:nae♦ T Rautmann PE Ted K F^ PE Thornas R Anderson. A I A DonaKJ C Burgardt PE Thon*aS A SvhiO PE F«eoy< J S»*entxyg. PE •smae' Madme/ p E Micnaei P Rau PE Agnes M R*ng AiCP ^N3rr>as W Pnfno^ PE M<rae< C Lyr<n p£ James R Maiand PE Je"v O Pe^rsen P£ kc3 J ♦•ganet pe •'^rvr^ P Ar.oe^r> P£ Mark R ROifs PE Mark A Se« PE Gary W Monen PE Paui J Ganr>on A i A varies j Edgerton P£ A R<fc Schmiot PS P^iiC J Casvvet PE Mart O \HWhv PE Mies B Jensen P£ L Phdtp Gave* P£ Aa«en L Wemen Pf Gary O tcrsioPc. PE •Ce-rt R rapQ p£ Dougas J Benoit PE Shat^ O Gustafson. PE Ceck« Oirsner PE Paul G Heuer PE John P Goroer PE Charles A Erctson Leo M Pawe-uv Marian M O son Jarr>es F Enge»nan3t City of Orono P.O Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn; Mr. John Gerhardson Re: 139 Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements File No. 13976 Dear John: Transmitted herewith are ten (10) copies of the above referenced report. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:kf End 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Pauh MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 REPORT FOR KELLY AVE. AREA STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ORONO, MINN January 1995 ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& IvJl Associates Engineers & Architects Bi^nextroo Ifoxfrxr A/\h-uk mif A wihiMvx tnt »♦ «r» AffitrruxTtxrf Aitton f CWt j O P'»n»-\i»ot* P| Bot-ffi 'A » **| ■ JO^rp»> < f*l i S. rv<«M Pt I Ttjrnri P| B r I'l* f'f ( N-»yf \ P| Bnbf'M Cl Si huMii Hf r| Sul^> M tr»r***n (PA • StfXtot Lonsttlt^nt January 18, 1995 A S.trvtoid Pf A ijcit.li ■' PI Bot>rM B Pfrtfvfif Pf Pt 1)ivirt () {itskfd,* rt BofwM t Bu*'>**fc A I A A Hoti'ifon Pf M*«ik A P| Me 1 P| fpd A ».«•»<» Pf ?pi- »»».•> P Ars}r*sort A i (»tiO •|,| ( Bi4» P| fhMm.4^ A Syffc*'i P| r»i*dr*»i J Sfr»*n»ifq P| (tm.jf M.«rti'>p/ Pf M> ......... f Bnc Pf f»e »*',«% Ar P»*»r*'r-** Pf Mu b.»**l C I > ''• Pf B Pf If'ffV t> PrM/M Pi P • J StP»'tHJ»<4 **t St iJJf J Af .i.tnek Pf fcf-MMftfl P Art(]|»«\r<t' Pf M.f* (f Pt.l*' MArh A Srip Pf VI Moitrn Pf P.«i.' I ‘ .-.tntiof A I A n.«nu‘l J frtgr*U»r» Pf A Bit I St ^»rtcH Pf PHt»ni I ( Pf MAr» t> VBa H i\ Pf Mil**' H Jf “fnrn Pf I Pr>iiii|T C>».«vPt Pf » ffM ; ilBc»-'m*ii Pf <j.«»y C> A'i'.rnf'»/ Pf B»tAn A Pf AritM B V,4pp Pf OouqlAi J Brnod P| n Gu\l.«fvoM Pf ' f! ilio Oliv >r» PI Pau « G Hnier Pf Jo*^n p (jorffef Pf Oar O Bovu '»* Pf Jrffff»V J (hlt‘Mt>g«*r ff V V »»f ( h^rtry A f ru A ion lr«> M P.4W(Mtfey M M Bing ! ♦ fngetr'Afdl Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Rc: 139 Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for proposed improvements to the drainage system on Kelly Avenue North of Carman Road. We reviewed various alignments for improving the storm sewer outlet for the area. We also reviewed raising the roadway in the area where Hooding occurs. Detailed cost estimates and drawings are provided within the report for each of the options. We have also enclosed minutes of the neighborhood meeting held on August 18, 1994. We would be pleased to meet with the City council and staff at your convenience to review the options presented for the improvements. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:lk 2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 6I2-636-4600 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................2 Introduction Project Description ............................................................................................................3 Storm Sewer Alignment .....................................................................................................4 Street Reconstruction .........................................................................................................4 Project Cost.......................................................................................................................5 Assessments.......................................................................................................................6 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................................6 Appendix A Cost Estimates Appendix B Informational Meeting Appendix C Soils Exploration Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Existing Storm Sewer System Proposed Storm Sewer Alternates Proposed Lift Station & Force Main Proposed Street Improvements Storm Sewer Profile (Alignment D) Bonestroo, Rosette, Anderiik Associates, Inc. 13976.rpi City of Orono Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements January 1995 Introduction The City of Orono ordered the preparation of this report to evaluate the feasibility of improving the drainage for the ponds on Kelly Avenue North of Carman Road. The drainage in this area has been a problem for 20 years or more. The purpose of this report is to define options for improvements and provide estimated project costs to determine project feasibility. The project will require permits from the Watershed and DNR. The existing storm drainage system maximizes the time it takes for storm water to discharge into Lake Minnetonica. The use of the ponding areas with the slow discharge rates make this an environmental sensitive system. It would be desirable to incorporate the principals of the existing system with any proposed improvements. The existing drainage system has been pieced together over time as development occurred. The storm sewer lines are of various sizes and don't seen to have a consistent direction of flow (figure 1). The flooding of Kelly Avenue occurs annually and the street is impassible during certain periods of time. This results in an inconvenience to the neighborhood and a safety problem for the roadway users. The objective of this project is to reduce the amount of time water stands over Kelly Avenue. The elevation of Kelly Avenue in this area is only 1.5 feet above the ordinary high water level for Lake Minnetonka. The vegetation in the ponding areas between Kelly Avenue and Carman Road make it impossible for the water to recede in a reasonable amount of time. Project Description The Kelly Avenue drainage basin includes 30 acres of residential property and 5 acres of commercial property. The basin generally drains southwest to Kelly pond and then into Carman Cove. The existing ponding areas work very well but there is an inadequate outlet for the ponds. The water quality discharging into Carman Cove needs to be considered when improving the storm drainage system. The existing storm sewer system does a good job of controlling the water quality. We would like to maintain the water quality by minimizing the discharge from Kelly pond into Carman Cove. The elevation of Kelly pond relative to Lake Minnetonka make it very difficult for any system to work efficiently. The high water elevation of Lake Minnetonka (931.5) is the same elevation as the desired high water elevation of Kelly pond. The improvements outlined in this report will maximize the storage in Kelly pond. The rate of discharge to Carman Cove will be minimized and the water quality will be maintained. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderiik <& Associates, Inc. 13976.rpt City of Orono Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements January 1995 Uiii Sewer Alignment We have ideniified five options for constructing a new outfall line from Kelly pond shown on Figure 2 and 3. The first four options are gravity lines and the fifth option is a lift station forcemain system. Option A - Provides for construction of storm sewer following Kelly Avenue from the Kelly pond to the Carman Cove Pond. This option results in a 20 foot deep excavation on Kelly Avenue to provide gravity flow. The advantage of this option is that the work can be completed on the street right-of-way. Option B - Provides for construction of storm sewer that follows the natural drainage way. This route is across private property and will require some tree removal. The depth of excavation is minimized by following the perimeter of the wetland area. Option C - Provides for replacement of the existing culverts and drainage tile in the area. This drainage route again follows the namral drainage route. This option would require excavation in the wetland area to create more open water and assure positive drainage. Option D - Provides for construction of storm water pipe between the ponds. This option utilizes the ponds for water quality improvement as does option "C". This option utilizes the best features of options A, B, and C. Option E - Provides for construction of a lift station and force main system. The existing storm sewer system would be left in place and maintained to control normal rainfall events. The lift station would operate when the larger storm events occur. The force main would follow Kelly Avenue from the lift station near Kelly pond to Carman Cove. Street Reconstruction The elevation of Kelly Avenue should be raised to minimize street flooding. The proposed outfall options would not eliminate the possibility of water inundating Kelly Avenue but would shorten the time period. The raising of Kelly Avenue will affect the sanitary sewer line and it should be replaced. The raising of Kelly Avenue in the low area (figure 4) between Navarre Cove and Carman Road will result in fiimre senlement of 5 inches as indicated by the soil report (Appendix C). The settlement can be minimized with the use of wood chips but the cost is greater. Bcnestroo, Rosette, AnderUk A Associates, Inc. 13976-ipc City of Orono Kelly Avenue A>'Cu Storm Drainage Improvements January 1995 We have reviewed the cost of raising the roadway one (1) foot and two (2) feet above the low point of 930.3. It is anticipated that the street would settle an additional three (3) inches from the weight added by two feet of fill. Project Cost Detailed cost estimates of the pressed improvements have been prepared and are included in the Appendix. All prices are based on anticipated unit prices for the 1995 construction season. The total project costs include ten (10) percent for contingencies and thirty (30) percent for engineering, legal, interest, and bonding costs. There are no costs included for easement acquisition. The total estimated cost for the various options is as follows: Storm Sewer Construction Option A - Gravity $81,290 Option B - Gravity $70,430 Option C - Gravity $66,140 Option D - Gravity $85,150 Option E - Lift Station $56,840 Kelly Avenue Street Construction Raise to Elevation 931.5 (1)$28,880 Raise to Elevation 932.5 (2’)40,040 Raise to Elevation 932.3 (2’)58,200 (with lightweight fill) Sanitary Sewer Line Replacement $18,090 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderiik «£ Associates, Inc. 13976. rpe City of Orono Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements January 1995 Xusessmenifi We would recommend that ihe project costs as outlined be charged to the benefitting property owners based on benefit received. The benefit can be calculated on an area basis of the property that has direct ruiwff to the drainage area. The total drainage area of appro.ximately 35 acres will benefit from the improvement. Conclusions and Recommendations The drainage improvements presented in this report are feasible as related to engineering principals and construction practices. We would recommend option E because it minimizes the impact on the neighborhood and it provides good Water Quality Management. We would also recommend raising Kelly Avenue two (2) feet to elevation 932.5. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the City council; That this report be adopted by the City of Orono as a guide for construction of the proposed improvement. That the City televise the sanitary sewer line on Kelly Avenue where the fill is to be placed. That the City investigate funding alternatives with established policies for storm water projects. Ihat the City hold an information meeting with the neighborhood prior to initlatiri^ the project. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to a public hearing. That the cost of the improvements be allocated equitably among the parcels in the study area receiving benefit. Bonestroo, Rosene, AnderUk Jc. Associates, Inc. 13976.rpt City of Orono Kelly Avenue Area Storm Drainage Improvements January 1995 The following schedule be implemented if the project is to proceed in 1995. Receive preliminary report January, 1995 Hold neighborhood meeting W W February, 1995 Public hearing March 27, 1995 Order Plans and specifications March 27, 1995 Approve Plans and specifications May 8, 1995 Open bids June 2, 1995 Award bids June 12, 1995 Start construction June 26, 1995 Complete construction August 18, 1995 Complete restoration September 15, 1995 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderiik A Associates, Inc. 13976.IPI 200STORM WATER DRAINAGE EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM sccie in feet 400 ORONO, MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE FIGURE 1 ^ I Boneatroo Roaene Anderlik S |\J| Associates 13976\13976R01.DWG 1/18/95 COMM. 13976 STORM WATER DRAINAGE PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALT. 100 200 Scale in feet m ORONO. MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE FIGURE 2 Boneatroo Roaene Anderlik d Associates 13976\13976R02.DWG 1/18/95 COMM. 13976 STORM WATER DRAINAGE PROPOSED LIFT STATION & FORCE MAIN Scale in feet ORONO, MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE 13976\13976R03.DWG 1/18/95 FIGURE 3 ^ I Bones troo rS f^osene Anderlik 4 |\J| Associates COMM. 15976 STORM WATER DRAINAGE o PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT scaie in feet 200 400 1 ORONO, MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE FIGURE 4 ^ I Bones (roo Rosene Anderlik & Associates 139, 'A13976R0-..DWG 1/18/95 COMM. 13976 1) ■> V* *o ' \js )r > ‘ *-r _ -> . h ^ im ^ 41 8 j-^OtNVW ^'lOUNVVJ V-z r 2 / %$ si:) . I •/! <li g »7« - r CCH- C>o* 0 r4 FIGURE 5 APPENDIX A Cost Estimates Alternate A Gravity Storm Sewer 850 Lin. Ft.18" PVC @ $35.00/lin. ft.$29,750.00 3 Ea.Manhole @ $l,500.00/ea 4,500.00 2 Ea.18" CM Aprons @ $125.00/ea 250.00 750 Sq. yd.Street Restoration @ S25.00/sq. yd.18,750.00 1.200 Sq. yd.Sod @ S3.00/sq. yd.3.600 00 Total $56,850.00 10% Contingencies 5.680.00 $62,530.00 30% Legal. Eng., Admin.18.760.00 Total Alternate A 581,290.00 Alternate B Gravity Storm Sewer 750 Lin. ft.18" PVC @ $40.00/lin. ft.$30,000.00 Ea.Manhole $l,500.00/ea 3,000.00 2 Ea.18" CM Apron @ $125.00/ea.250.00 160 Sq. yd.Street Restoration @ $25.00/sq. yd.4.000.00 4,000 Sq. yd.Sod @ S3.00/sq. yd.J2.QQQ.00 Total $49,250.00 10% Contingencies 4.930.00 $54,180.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.16.250.00 Total Alternate B $70,430.00 Alternate C Gravity Storm Sewer 350 Lin. ft.18" PVC @ $50.00/lin. ft.$17,500.00 3 Ea.18" CM Aprons @ $125.00/ea 750.00 400 Lin. ft.Ditch grading (Q $30.00/lin. ft.12,000.00 ICO Sq. yd.Street Restoration @ $25.00/sq. yd.4,000.00 4,000 Sq. yd.Sod (§) S3.00/sq. yd.12.000.00 Total $46,250.00 10% Contingencies 4.630.00 $50,880.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.15.260.00 Total Alternate C $66,140.00 8 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 13976.rpt Alternate D Gravity Storm Sewer 880 Lin. ft.18" PVC O $35.00/lin. ft.S30.800.00 6 Ea.18" CM Apron @ $125.00/ea.750.00 3 Ea.Manholes @ $l,500.00/ea.4,500.00 460 Sq. yd.Street Restoration @ $25.00/sq. yd.11,500.00 4,000 Sq. yd.Sod @ $3.00/sq. yd.12.000 00 Total $59,550.00 10% Contingencies 5.950 00 $65,500.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.19.650 00 Total Alternate D $85,150.00 Alternate E Storm Sewer Lift Station 950 Lin. ft.6" PVC force main @ $15.00/Iin. ft.$14,250.00 1 Ea.Manhole (6' diameter)3,500.00 Lump Sum Install salvaged pumps 5,000.00 Lump Sum Install electrical service 5,000.00 I Ea.Inlet control structure 2,500.00 950 Lin. ft.Restoration @ SlO.OO/lin. ft.9.500.00 Total $39,750.00 10% Contingencies 3.975.00 $43,725.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.13.115.00 Total Alternate E $56,840.00 KeDv Avenue Street Construction (Raise 1') 300 Cu. Yd.Common borrow (Q $6.00/cu. yd.$ 1,800.00 700 Sq. Yd.Mill bituminous surface & $2.00/sq. yd.1,400.00 600 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $9.00/ton 5,400.00 150 Ton Bituminous surface @ S26.00/ton 3,900.00 900 Sq. Yd.Stabilization fabric (8> $2.00/sq. yd.1,800.00 600 Lin. Ft.Silt fence <3> S4.00/Iin. ft.2,400.00 Lump Sum Restoration 2,500.00 50 Lin. Ft.18" culvert @ $20.00/lin. ft.1.000.00 Total Construction $20,200.00 10% Contingencies 2.020.00 $22,220.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.6.660.00 Total Project Cost 9 $28,880.00 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik <£ Associates, Inc. 13976.IP* KeDy Avenue Stre^ Construction (Raise 2') 700 Cu. Yd.Common borrow @ $6 00/cu. yd.$ 4,200.00 800 Sq. Yd.Mill bituminous surface @ $2.00/sq. yd.1,600.00 800 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $9.00/ton 7,200.00 200 Ton Bituminous surface @ $26.00/ton 5,400.00 200 Sq. Yd.Stabilization fabric @ S2.(X)/sq. yd.2,400.00 800 Lin. Ft.Silt fence @ S4.00/lin. ft.3,200.00 Lump Sum Restoration 3,000.00 50 Lin. Ft.18" culvert @ S20.00/lin. ft.1.000.00 Total Construction $28,000.00 10% Contingencies 2.800.00 $30,800.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.9.240.00 Total Project Cost $40,040.00 KeUy Avenue Street Ci I »ol (Li^tweigfat Fill) 1500 Cu. Yd.Common excavation (Q $6.00/cu. yd.$ 9,000.00 550 Cu. Yd.Wood chips (Q $12.00/cu. yd.6,600.00 1,200 Cu. Yd.Granular backftll @ $6.00/cu. yd.7,200.00 700 Ton Class 5 aggregate base Q $9.(X)/ton 6,300.00 200 Ton Bituminous surface ® $26.00/ton 5,200.00 1,200 Sq. Yd.Stabilization fabric @ $2.00/sq. yd.2,400.00 Lump Sum Restoration 3,000.00 50 Lin. Ft.18' Culvert ® $20.00/lin. ft.1.000.00 Total Construction $40,700.00 10% Contingencies 4.070.00 $44,770.00 30% Legal, Eng., Admin.13.430.00 Total Project Cost $58,200.00 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik <£ Associates, Inc. 13976.ipt APPENDIX B r~ i • I, ( . EVFORMATIONAL MEETING ON KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE AUGUST 18, 1994 An informational meeting to discuss the Kelly Avenue drainage issue was held on the above date with Public Works Director John Gerhardson, City Engineer Glenn Cook and Recorder Lin Vee representing the City. The meeting was called to order at 7.32 p.m. Gerhardson explained that those people most directly affected by some type of construction in order to eliminate the flooding problems on Kelly Avenue had been invited to this informal meeting. The Orono City Councjl recently directed the City Engineer to review the problems on Kelly Avenue and suggest some possible solutions Gerhardson distributed a diagram developed by the City Engineer indicating four alternatives, or combinations, for consideration to correct the drainage problems. Cook stated the area generally under water is called Kelly Pond. A series of culverts currently exist with a tile drain to Carman Road. Any series of culverts will fill up with sediments and nmoff from the area. Cook explained the four alternatives; 1 . Option A is the alignment along Kelly Avenue to Carman Cove. The approximate cost is 581,300. Much of this cost is in street replacement. 2. Option B also carries pipe from Kelly Pond to Carman Cove with an approximate cost of $70,400. Options A and B are not as environmentally desirable as C and D. The current system follows this path. 3. Option C is a series of culverts with the least amount of pipe. This is basically an upgrade of the existing culvert system costing approximately $66,150. Mrs. Mitchell, 2587 Kelly Avenue, commented on a slough and creek that runs through this area that has caused water problems in basements in the past. Ginger Scott, 2620 Kelly Avenue, asked what has changed to cause more flooding recently. Cook responded that when the drought occurred several years ago, it was perceived to be drying. Over the last few years, very wet weather has occurred causing the problems to resurface. The culverts are old and need improvements, therefore are not functioning as well as in the past. Option D is a cross between other options and would cost about $85,000. There is some clearing work and also some deep cutting which is costly. Scott asked who would pay for the costs of the project. Cook responded that 35 acres (frain into the KeUy Avenue basin. Typically on a stormwater project, nmilrt improvement are the ones who pay for it. Stormwater projects are difficiflt to assess, were to proceed, there would be a public hearing with aU the p^ple who are m and then an assessment hearing. If there are not many appeals of the assessments, then the project would proceed. 4. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEETLNG ON KELLY’ AVENUE DR.AINAGE AUGUST 18, 1994 Farnham noted that Rick's Super Valu on the hill is a major contributor to runoff. The pond near h'S property is a small holding pond for the amount of possible runoff Cook explained it was a water quality pond which takes care of silt and sand rather than large quantities of water. Farnham asked what would happen if that pond were deepened. Cook responded that the rate of runoff cannot be controlled to small enough numbers to help Kelly Pond. Stoddard asked for discussion about raising the road 1' or 2'. Cook replied that raising the road would require digging out appro.ximately 4' and filling v%nth lightweight aggregate with a cost of approximately $40,000 to raise the road 18" This would not necessarily solve the problem. There is still water standing in back>’ards and ponding on the nonh side of Carman that may kill trees due to standing in water. Gerhardson noted that the problem keeps getting worse and is becoming more than just an inconvenience. There are concerns with school bus traffic and emergency vehicles. Mrs Farnham asked what would happen if Kelly Pond were deepened so it could hold more water. Cook did not think it would do a lot of good because of the water table. The average lake level is at 929.4 with the elevation of the road at 930.9 in this area. This is a flat area and any system may have problems. Stoddard noted that if the lake sometimes gets higher than the water table it will back up into this area and the road will still be under water. Cook added the total solution is to raise the road and install piping. Stoddard commented that deepening the slough would not make a lot of difference because the soil is already saturated. In a recent survey he had done of his property, some pans of the road were at 930. The 100 year flood plain is at 931. He hoped the City would have some responsibility in sharing the costs since the road should not be built in the flood plain. He has three main concerns: 1. Safety. There is a direct affect on the homeowners in the area as they have to drive through water. Even though the water may be only 2" deep, others traveling the road will drive onto yards to avoid the water in the road. If the water is deeper than 2", it affects their vehicles and brakes. 2. Environmental. Traces of chemicals are left behind every time a vehicle drives through the water. Since it is connected to the lake, there is a contribution to pollution of Lake Minnetonka. 3. Cost. The residents feel the City has some responsibility. Stoddard suggested thp»* may be funds available to the City from an environmental impact. He felt if the u -^u were built to the 931 elevation, it would curtail many standing water problems. If 50-60 residents were assessed, it may only be a $40 impact per year as a tax increase. Cook noted that the costs of easements were not included in projea cost estimates. Hopefully there would be some property owners willing to donate easements. INFORMATIONAL xMEETING ON KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE AUGUST 18,1994 Scott commented that Option D would have a major impact on trees that would have to be removed. It would take years to replace that growth. Stoddard asked about raising the road to see how that works and then look at a drainage system. He felt raising the road 2' would have minimal impact on the neighboring properties and would take care of the majority of the problems. Gerhardson felt there would have to be something done in addition to raising the road. The pipe along Famhams ’ property is only 8" while the pipe under Kelly .A.venue at the pond area is a 12" pipe. As it goes under the ne.xt driveway, an 18" pipe is used and then runs into an 8" pipe as it goes under Carman Road. This restrirtion slows drainage down. The same size pipe throughout the system would be desirable. Farnham asked about the possibility of an additional pond at the Kelly Avenue comer. Cook questioned if it would actually help with flooding problems. He added that from a water quality point of view, the current system is good. Gerhardson stated that by just raising the road, every culvert would have to be open and working to capacity to be effective. Farnham noted that at one time an option was considered to run a storm sewer along the sanitary sewer lines to County Road 19 Cook stated it would have to be pumped up to get through the Old Beach Road area which would be difficult and costly. Mrs Mitchell thought the road had settled and there was less water in the slough than in the past. Gerhardson felt the growth over the years may make it appear that way. Mrs. Farnham asked what would happen to Carman Cove if the pipes were increased in size and there was more drainage. She stated there were already a lot of weeds in Carman Cove. Mr. Farnham thought increased water would only lead to more weeds. Cook agreed. Stoddard reiterated that raising the road with a culvert underneath it seemed the most economical route. Cook stated the City has many concerns and would have to be prepared to do the en^e project if raising the road did not solve the problem. Stoddard asked if the City has an obhgation to build the road at or above the flood plain of Lake Minnetonka. Cook thought the road was probably built at the 932 elevation but the road has settled. Mrs. MitcheU asked why there were no problems with the road that goes through the slough. Gerhardson responded the road construction was different on Kelly Avenue. Gerhardson stated that the size of the pipe along Famham ’s house was a major concern. If there any changes in drainage, it would be imperative that water could run out of it.were INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON KELLY AVTNUE DRAINAGE AUGUST 18, 1994 Mrs. Famham asked if there wasn't a concern for the quality of Carman Cove because four homes considered that their lakesh^'.e. Gerhardson questioned what the final impact would be. Cook added that Kelly Pond does a lo» of nutrient removal. Scott expressed her objection to major work through her yard. Famham referred to earlier discussions about easements. He did not think he would be in favor of giving easements to the City but they could be negotiated. Laura asked if there was any obligation of the City toward this project and if there were any funds available to the City through other agencies. Cook responded there were few agencies that would provide funding. Mr. Famham summarized his thoughts: 1. He is in favor of raising the road as it is the best solution when considering lake levels. 2. He would consider the addition of a pond at the Kelly Avenue comer by Rick's Super Valu. There is a possibility that the pond by Rick's could be dug deeper to increase capacity. Nothing should be done with piping at this time. Wait to see the results of the first two suggestions. 4. In regards to payment, the City should look at who contributes to the water problem which results in the road problems. One possibility may be to survey the area to see how many square feet each property has that drains into the area. An assessment could be based on how much water is contributed to the problem. 5. He felt the City has some obligation and at a least a portion of the costs should be spread over the whole City. The road was put in too low and neighboring property owners should not have to pay the full cost of upgrading. Other neighbors agreed with Mr. Famham's comments. Stoddard requested that the City pursue any funding which may be available for road use in general and environmental impacts. Gerhardson suggested soil testing be done before proceeding with raising the road. Records fi’om the original Kelly Avenue constmction are not available. DJFORMATIONAL MEETING ON KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE AUGUST 18,1994 Stoddard expressed his appreciation for the interest being taken in solving this problem. He would like further information on timing of the project. Cook thought it may be a month before they could get back to the Council since they would look at the pond behind Rick's for the possible effects it could have. Stoddard submitted a letter written by his neighbors, Kurt & Christa Nejezchleba, expressing their concerns about the drainage problems on Kelly Avenue Gerhardson read the letter to those in attendance. Mitchell asked about sewer and water lines running along the road. Gerhardson replied these utility lines are in the road right-of-way and should not affect this project. The meeting closed at 8:40 p.m. A AMERICAN ENGINEERING Testing, Inc. APPENDIX C CONSULTANTS •or. TECHNICAL • Materials • environmental September 27, 1994 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Sc Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Attn: Glenn Cook RE: Kelly Avenue Grade Raise West of Lydiard Avenue Onmo, Minnesota AET #94-1868 Dear Mr. Cook: This letter report presents the results of the exploratory soU boring -uid our geotechnical comments relating to the planned grade raise for KeUy Avenue. This work is being perfcmned as authorized by you on September 8, 1994. Our authorized scope of work includes the following: • One standard penetration test boring, which was ext»ided to a depth of 36'. • Water content testing in the laboratory. • Geotechnical engineering review of the effects of a 2' grade raise, and preparation of this report. #Il*J L-vH MfflDBMltfQB A segment of Kelly Avenue west of Lydiard Avenue extends through a low swanq>y area. Because the road has settled with time, the lower surface elevation of the road results in periodic flooding. Therefore, you plan to study the effects of adding 2' of fill to the currait road embankment to reduce the potential for flooding. We undentand watermain and sanitary sewer utilities lie below the existing street It is believed the watermain is supported by the existing road embankment, although the sanitary sewer has more recendy been reconstructed and is reportedly supported on piling. Subsurface Exploration The subsurface exploration program consisted of one standard penetration test boring on September 16, 1994. Originally, we had planned a boring depth on the order of 20', although because of conditions, the boring was extended to 36' to penetrate organic and very loose soils. • AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER ' 2102 Unlnnlty Avt. W. • St. Paul, MN 55114 • 512-559-9001 »FaM 012-559-1370 4431 West Micnigan Strutt. Suitt «4 •Ouiuth. MN 55807 •218-828-1S18 «Fax 218^28-1580 1730 First Avenut •Mankato. MN 56001 •507-387 2272 •Fax 507.387-8999 Glenn Cook September 23, 1994 Page 2 The location of the test boring appears on attached Figure 1, and was located T northeast of the existing street centerline. No t,urlVtce elevation was measured, although it is estimated to be about 931', based on the contour plan provided. We refer you to the standard sheet entitled "Exploration/Classification Methods'* for details on the drilling and sampling methods, the classification methods, and the water level measurement methods. Data sheets concerning the Unified Soil Classification System, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs are also attached. Laboratory Testing To aid our evaluation of soil conditions, five of the samples were submitted to the laboratory for water content testing. The results of the tests qipear on the boring log, opposite the samples upon which they were performed (in the "WC" column). Soil/Ground Water Conditions We refer you to the boring log for specific details of the conditions encountered. The log contains information concerning soil layering, soil classification, soil description, and moisture. Relative density or consistency is also noted, which is based on the standard penetration resistance (N-value). The boring indicates a profile of 1514' of fill overlying organic swamp deposits, which are about 12' thick. The swamp is then underlain by alluvial silty sands and silts. The fill is mostly sandy in the upper 4' zone, and mostly clayey below this. Ashes were also "'^ted to be present. Tim underlying swamp deposits include both organic clays and fibiic peats, with water contents ranging from 107% to 340% (suggesting a relatively high organic content). The boring log only indicates the subsurface conditions at the sampled location and variations should be expected away ficum the test location. The boreholes were probed for the presence of ground water, and water level measurements were taken (as recorded on the boring log). A discussion of the water level measurement methods is presented within the attached data sheets. A water level was measured as shallow as 3.8' beneath the surface As overlying soils are non-waterbearing granular soils, we judge the watjr level had reasonably stabilized within the borehole, and the measured levels should reasonably represent the ground water table at that time and location. Ground water levels usually fluctuate. Fluctuations occtir due to varying .wasonal and yearly rainfidl and snow melt, as well as other fiactors. Glenn Cook Sq>tcmbcr23, 1994 Page 3 Geotechniral Review Based on the [wwent swamp dqwsit thickness, and the relatively high moisture — su^t a ronsid^le amount cf settlement has occurred in the past. We understand' the seSS .^'nitSTa Our scope of scnric»s did not include laboratory consolidation testing of the oreanic soils Inorder to accmately predict settlenrents, several consoUdadon tests wolild ty^ 0 swamp deposit vanes. Instead, we conducted water content tests to aid in estimating compresstbiUty. ITierefore, predictions presented herein should be considered rough on the easting road embanlcment being in place for at least 20 years, we «ai-.r. finite settl^^ts of the roadway assodated with secondary consoUdation (^ardkss of grade raise) wuM be on tte order of 2' -I; over the next 20 years. The addition of 2' of ffll rdU^t in «“<* wiU induce additional primary consolidation. We^timate this additional.- ement to be on the order of 3', which may occur within one year B^ on the abwe, estimated long-term settlements due to a 2' increase (both primary and saoi^ , IS ;^>nale<l to be on the order of 5*±. We su^t this type of settlement ’sag* However, you should consider the efiects of Mttlcmcnt on the utilities. Watennam is typicaUy flexible, although the watermain has already likely experiCTced significant settlements. These settlements will also have an effect Cai mic- repported utilitcs, as the soil settling around and above the pile-supported system will experience downdrag or negative load caused by adhesion of the surrounding settling sods. seajement is undesit^Ie, it would be possible to reduce settlements associated with pn^ consohdanon by excavatmg a portion of the existing fiU soils, and replacing tbae heavy “fro-iT~:^rraS^r'“‘”^- >*^‘-»vailabieforeviewdUswithyou Glenn Cook September 23, 1994 Page 4 Standard of Care Our services for your project have been conducted to those standards considered normal for services of this type at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, either express or implied, is intend^. Clsaux If you have any questions regarding the work reported herein, or if ^ am be of furth» sovice to you, please do not hesitate to contact me at ^9-1305. Report Reviewed By: Manager, Geotechnical Engineering JKV/JCR/sm Attachments: Figure 1 - Boring Lx)cation Sketch Log of Test Boring Exploration/Classification Methods Boring Log Notes Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes General Terminology Notes JVynes C. Rudd, PE Principal Engineer AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. PROJECT KELLY AVENUE GRADE RAISE ORONO, MINNESOTA AET JOB NO. 94-1868 SUBJECT FIGURE 1 - BORING LOCATION DATE :/-26-94 SCALE r = i55'± DRAWN BY JKV CHECKED BY PAGE 1 OF 1 I A AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AETJOBNO: 94-1868 project. kelly avenue . WEST OF LYDfARD: ORONO. MN lOQ OF BORINO NO.1 f D, 1 of 1) DEPTH IN FEET surface ELEVATION:----- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY SAMPLE TYPE REC. IN. FIELD Jt LABORATORY TEST DEN %-lC 4.5* BitumtiKHis pavemeol I -14* Base, mostly brown sand with silt and Wraycl 3 4 Fill, mixture of sand and silty sand with gravel, brown and black Fill, mostly ashes, black 3 - 6 - 7 - I - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 10 17 - 18 19 20 21 - Fill, mixture of lean clay and sandy lean clay with a little gravel, gray FILL Fibric peat, dark brown, moist (PT) Organic clay, dark brown and black, very soft (OH/PT) Organic clay, black, very soft (OH) m 1.5 SWAMP DEPOSIT TW I ss TW 18 24 340 308 107 DEPTH: DRiLLING METHOD water level ME/VSUREMENTS 0-29.5’ 3.25" HS1 date TIME sampled DEPTH casinq DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH DRILLING FLUID LEVEL WATER LEVEL 29.5-34.5 ’ RD w/DM 9/16/94 10:50 6.0 4.5 4.6 4.1 9.16/94 10:54 6.0 4.5 4.0 3.8 BORING COMPLETED: 9/16/94 9/16/94 10:58 6.0 4.5 4.6 3.8 CC; CB CA: VD Ri,: 33 9/16/94 11:46 31.0 29.5 17.5 U.9 NOTB: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG 4/90 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.SUBSURFACE BORIIiG LOG ACT JOB NO: 94-H6S PROJECT: KELLY AVENL'E, WEST OF LYDIARD; ORQNO. MN LOO OB BOIUNO NO.1 (p. 2 of 2) DECTH IN FECT MATERIAL OESCRimON GEOLOGY SAMPLE TYPE REC IN. RELO A LABORATORY TEST OEN *-20 23 ^Organic clay, black, very soft (OH) 15 - 2« - 27 - 2S - » H 30 - 31 - 32 33 - 34 - 35 - Organic clay with a little wood, dark brown, gray and black, very soft (OH/PT) Silty sand, fine grained, gray, wet, very loose (SM) Silt, gray, wet, loose (ML) END OF BORING ♦ALLUVIUM Location: Kelly Avenue, 7 ’NE of centerline, lOO’SE of M25i7 driveway centerline 4/90 swamp DEPOSIT COARSE ALLUVIUM FINE ALLUVIUN I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %<V- DATE: JanuafV^O, 199^ ^ ' <y <•' ITEM NO: O Department Aoproval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Cooperative Agreement for the Long Lake Water Quality Improvement Project I have attached a copy of the most recent draft of the cooperative agreement for the Long Lake improvement project. Two significant changes in this draft are as follows: 1. The project no longer includes the construction of aeration systems. These have been replaced by chemical treatment using alum. 2. The costs for which the city is responsible are the sediment removal costs of the wet detention ponds. The city ’s annual share of these costs is estimated to be S4.535 per vear. The other responsibilities of the city under this agreement would be as follows: A. Prepare a local water management plan for this area, and submit it to the MCWD for review and approval prior to construction of the improvements. B. Agree to develop policies and disseminate information on best management practices and include these in the water management plan. C. Clean the fish barrier in the County Road 6 pond. D. Provide a representative to the project advisory committee. Questions Remaining Unanswered 1. tkm • The agreement expires in the year 2000 and may be renewed for another 5 year term if all parties agree. Who becomes responsible for maintenance of the detention ponds after the agreement expires. What is the status of the County Road 6 detention pond? COLTS ’CIL ACTION REQUESTED: Identification of concerns regarding the most recent draft of the agreement, and items to be clarified in the agreement. POPHAM HATK MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: MCWD BOARD OF MANAGERS PRASANTA K. REDDY 3300 Piper Jaffrav Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis. Minnesota SS402 (612) 333-4800 DATE: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE LONG LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT JANUARY 10. 1995 Enclosed please find the most recent draft of the Cooperative Agreement for the Long Lake Improvement Project This draft reflects the following changes: • On page 3, paragraph 2.2, the definition of improvements was changed to include chemical treatment and the phrase, "construction of aeration systems" was deleted. • On page 3, paragraph 2.4, the definition of routine oj^cration and maintenance costs was changed to include only general site maintenance and not periodic sediment removaL • On page 4, paragraph 3.1, the phrase, "construction of aeration systems" was changed to "chemical treatment in Long Lake." • On page 4, paragraph 3.1.1, the phrase, "construction of hypolimnetic aerators, one for each basin of Long Lake" was deleted and replaced with "use of alum in Long Lake." • On page 7, paragraph 3.1.12, the phrase, "routine and technical" was inserted to clarify the MCWD responsibility and the phrase, "routine maintenance" was changed to "sediment removal" to accurately reflect the responsibility of the Cities. • On page 8, paragraph 3.2.2, a sentence was added to clarify the responsibility of the Cities witli respect to best management practices. • On page 8, paragraph 3.2.3, the phrase, "routine operation and maintenance costs" was replaced with "sediment removal costs." • On page 9, paragrs^h 3.2.5, was deleted due to the fact that the Board of Managers has decided to use alum treatment rather than aerators. Please feel free to call me if you have any further comments or suggestions. . . i* *.; .* h. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the Long Lake Improvement Project This Cooperative Agreement is made on this___day of___, 1994, by and between the Minnehaha Crcck Watershed District (hereinafter referred to as "MCWD"), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D; the City of Long Lake (hereinafter referred to as "City of Long Lake"), a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota; the City of Orono (hereinafter referred to as "Orono"), a body corporate a id politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota; the City of Medina (hereinafter referred to as "Medina"), a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota; and Hennepin County, a body corporate and politic and a county in the State of Minnesota. 1. Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS, Long Lake is situated approximately two miles north of Lake Minnetonka in western Hennepin County and its watershed, encompassing an area of 6,860 acres, includes the City of Long Lake and portions of Orono and Medina; WHEREAS, Long Lake has a public boat landing and two public swimming beaches; the lake has been used historically for recreation and has a high potential for future recreational use, but water quality degradation currently impairs swimming and fishing; 275/14070523 mO/95 f. \ • V WHEREAS, the Long Lake subwatershed drains into Lake Minnetonka and, consequently, any improvements to water quality in Long Lake will have a positive, district wide effect: WHEREAS, in 1989, the MCWD received a Clean Water Partnership Grant to investigate lake water quality and characterize and quantify the sources contributing to the decline in water quality; thereafter, the MCWD proceeded to develop an implementation plan (hereinafter "Implementation Plan") to set forth specific actions to be undertaken to improve the water quality; WHEREAS, the MCWD has an approved Water Resources Management Plan which identifies Long Lake as a priority resource, and the MCWD’s Capital Improvement Program identifies water quality improvement projects in the Long Lake area as priority projects; WHEREAS, the CiUes of Long Lake, Orono and Medina and Hennepin County have, through their governing bodies, expressed support for the Long Lake Improvement Project; WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that their ability to improve the water quality in Long Lake in accorddr>ce with the Implementation Plan i^ dependent upon each party satisfactorily and promptly performing its individual obligations and working cooperatively with the other parties as to those tasks which are to be jointly undertaken; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties that they enter into this Cooperative Agreement in order to document the understanding of the parties as to the scope of the entire project; reaffirm the commitment of each party as to the general responsibilities and tasks to be undertaken by each party; establish procedures for 275/14070525 1/10/95 Vi£.. pcrfontiing these snd responsibililiesi and facilitate communication and coopetution among the parties to ensure successful completion of the project through the construction of stormwat er treatment systems to reduce nutrient loadings, implementation of best watershed management practices, in-lake improvements, and public education programs, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of improving water quality in Long Lake. 2. Dcflnitlons For the purposes of this document, the following terms shall have the meanings given in this paragraph. 2.1. "City" or "Cities" shall mean the cities of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina, collectively. 2.2. "Improvements" refers collectively to the following stormwater u^atment systems! chemical treatment, sedimentation basins, detention/retention of runoff, stormwatei diversions, restoration of wet detention pond/wetland areas, and construction of wet detention ponds/wetland treatment systems. 2.3 "Monitoring Plan" shall mean the water quality monitoring plan developed to identify the specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quality assurance and quality conuol procedures in order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseline data and any changes in water quality throughout the Long Lake subwatershed for the duration of this project 2.4. "Routine Operation and Maintenance Costs" shall mean the general site maintenance necessary to keep fences, grass, etc. in good order and appearance. 275/14070525 lAO/95 */ ■ • • 3. General Responslbilitie* ■ Parties 3.1. MCWD Tha MCWD shall be responsible for the design, construction, and technical maintenance and operation of the stormwater treatment systems for the purpose of reducing internal and external phosphorous loading into Long Lake. These systems shall consist of sedimentation basins, deiention/rctention of runoff, stoimwater diversions, restoration of wet detention pond/wetland areas, construction of wet detention ponds/wetland treatment systems specifically designed to remove nutrients from .stormwater runoff, and chemical treatment in Long Lake to maintain areas of well oxygenated water (hereinafter referred to collectively as "improvements"). 3.1.1. The parties anticipate the use of alum in Long Lake to reduce in*lake phosphorous loading. The parties also anticipate the construction of three wet detention ponds/wetlands to treat external phosphorous loading; one between County Road No. 6 and the DNR protected wetland adjacent to the north side of Long Lake, and two connected basins adjacent to Long Lake in a city designated park. These systems will be selected and designed by MCWD, based upon a determination of their feasibility as provided below in sub'paragraphs 3.1.3 through 3.1.5 of this paragraph of the Agreement 3.1.2. The MCWD will pay for the installation of structural fish barriers at the outlet of Long Lake, at the outlet of the Long Lake City Park wet detention pond/wetland, and at the outlet of the County Road No. 6 wet detention pond/wetland, subject to assumption of the 275/I407(«25 I/1(W95 • • ongoing bi.'trier maintenance and cleaning by Long Lake and Orono, as discussed below in paragraph 3.2.4 of this Agreement 3.1.3. The MCWD shall present to each cf the other parties to this Agreement and to the Project Advisory Committee pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement a feasibility report prepared by the MCWD District Engineer concerning each improvement or set of improvements for review and comment prior to public hearing. 3.1.4. Following the distribution of a feasibility report by the MCWD District Engineer to parties to this Agreement and the Project Advisory Committee, and following due notice to the public as required by law, the MCWD shall hold a public hearing on each proposed improvement 3.1.5. The MCWD shall ordwr each improvement only upon a determination by the MCWD Board of Managers that the improvement w*il be conducive to the public health and promote the general welfare, and is in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 103B.205 to 103B.255, and the MCWD Water Resources Management Plan adopted pursuant to Section 103B.231, make findings accordingly, determine the cost of the improvement, and certify the cost before October first of each year to Hennepin County and Carver County for payment 3.1.6. The MCWD shall prepare the design plans and specifications for each ordered improvement and present them to each party to this Agreement and to the Project Advisory Committee pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement io» review and comment prior to public hearing for a minimum period of no less thirty (30) days. Z75/1407Q525 I/lQ/95 */C 3.1.7. No less than thirty (30) days following the distribution of the design plans and specifications for each ordered improvement from tlie MCWD to parties to this Agreement and the Project Advisory Committee, and following due notice to the public, the MCWD shall hold a public hearing on each design plan and specification; the MCWD shall approve the design plan and specification for each ordered improvement based upon the review and comments of the parties to this Agreement, and the record of the public hearing, and upon a determination that the improvement will be conducive to the public health and promote the general welfare, and is in compliance with Miimesota Statutes Sections 103B.205 to 103B.255, and the MCWD Water Resources Management Plan adopted pursuant to Section 103B.231. 3.1.8. The MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of the contractor or contractors to perform the construction of the ordered improvements in a manner consistent with state law. The MCWD shall also be responsible for the negotiation of construction contracts, and the supervision of the project construction. 3.1.9. The MCWD shall be responsible for planning and conducting any necessary environmental reviews in connection with the ordered improvements. 3.1.10. The MCWD shall be responsible for obtaining any governmental permits, and private approvals or property rights necessary for the construction, maintenance, and operation of the improvements, subject to paragraph 3.2.5 of this Agreement; the parties anticipate that it will be necessary to acquire private interests to re;J property and the parties agree to 275/14070525 m095 cooperate in identifying the most effective and efficient means by which to acquire such private property interests. 3.1.11. The MCWD will be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits. obtaining the necessary chemicals, and conducting treatment and monitoring results at Long TjaVi* with alum to reduce phosphorous concentrations in those lakes. The MCWD agrees to present its plan for these chemical treatments in the manner provided in paragnq)hs 3.1.6 and 3.1.7 of this Agreement. 3.1.12. The MCWD shall be responsible for preparing a plan for the operation and maintenance (hereinafter "Maintenance Plan") of the improvements, including ongoing monitoring, and presenting such a plan to the Project Advisory Committee for review and comment pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement 3.1.13. The MCWD shall be responsible for the entire projer* 'osts associated with the feasibility analysis, design, technical and routine operation and maintenance of the improvements, subject to City responsibility for sediment removal costs as described in paragraph 3.2.3 of this Agreement 3.1.14. The MCWD agrees that the MCWD District Engineer’s feasibility reports and designs for the improvements in the area of the Long Lake subwatershed, as identified in the map attached to this Agreement for reference as Appendix A, shall be provided to the Cities; further, the MCWD agrees that these documents may constitute a substantial basis for the preparation of the local water management plans for the Cities of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina for the area identified in Appendix C, and that upon proper endorsement, completion, 275/14070525 1/10/95 * .* and resubmittal of these documents to the MCWD, the MCWD win approve them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdivision 3. 3.2.Local Responsibilities (Cities of Long Lake, Orono, Medina) 3.2.1. The Cities agree to prepare local water management plans, as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdivisions 1 and 2, for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed identified in Appendix A to this Agreement, based upon the feasibility reports, design plans, and specifications for this project prepared by the MCWD and any other relevant information identified by the Cities, including plans for implementing best management practices as provided for in sub-paragraph 3.2.2 of this paragraph to this Agreement; the Cities agree that prior to construction of any of the MCWD stormwater treatment improvements, the Cities will submit their local water management plans for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed within their cities to the MCWD for its review and approval pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdivision 3. 3.2.2. The Cities agree to develop policies and disseminate information, subject to paragraph 5.4 of this Agreement, on a variety of best management practices relating to water quality, including but not limited to the following: .yard waste management -urban fertilizer management -livestock waste management -agricultural practices 275/14070525 1/10/95 8 While the Cities may use their discretion in developing the specific details of the policies, the Cities must develop some plan for best management practices and include such plan in its local water management plan, as provided in sub-paragraph 3.2.1 of this paragn^h to this Agreement 3.2.3. The Cities agree to share in the sediment removal costs of the wet detention ponds/wetlands, as defined in the maintenance plan described in paragraph 3.1.11 of this Agreement in accordance to the following cost sharing formulae one-half of the costs apportioned to MCWD, one-sixth of the costs apportioned to the City of Long Lake, one-sixth of the costs apportioned to Orono, and one-sixth of the costs apportioned to Medina. 3.2.4. The City of Long Lake agrees to be responsible for any necessary cleaning associated with the structural fish barrier to be installed in Long Lake and in the Long Lake City Park wet detention pond/wetland. 3.2.5. Orono agrees to be responsible for any necessary cleaning associated with the structural fish barrier to be installed in the County Road No. 6 wet detention pond/wetland. 3.3. Hennepin County Heimepin County agrees to provide the necessary interim financing to MCWD for the activities identified in this Agreement as MCWD responsibilities. Hennepin County’s financial responsibility to this Agreement will be limited to that provided for in Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.251. 27S/1407Q525 m(»5 4. Monitoring Plan MCWD agrees to develop and implement a water quality monitoring plan ("Monitoring Plan”) which will identify the specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quality assurance and quality control procedures in order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseline data and any changes in water quality throughout the Long Lake subwatershed for the duration of this project The Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the Project Advisory Committee described in paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement on or before May 1, 1995 for review and comment by all parties to this Agreement before any actions implementing the Monitoring Plan are commenced. On or before June 1, following review and comment by the Project Advisory Committee, the Monitoring Plan shall be agreed upon and adopted by all parties as an amendment to this Agreement The MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of a qualified laboratory to perform the data analysis required by the Monitoring Plan and shall be responsible for the costs of the laboratory sample analysis. 5. Project Advisory Committee 5.1. A Project Advisory Committee shall be created to provide technical consultation on engineering and environmental aspects of projects developed under this Agreement to provide comments and technical advice on the Monitoring Plan described in paragraph 4 of this Agreement and the designs, plans, and specifications of each project component and to provide preliminary consultation to the parties on specific technical matters that will eventually be submitted to one or more agencies for a permit or other approval. The Project 275/14070525 1/10/95 Advisory Committee shall also be responsible for appointing a Public Education Sub committee to coordinate the public education efforts by the Cities, as provided in paragraph 3.2.2 of this Agreement 5.2. The members of the Project Advisory Committee shall consist of one representative from wch party to this Agreement as selected by the governing body of that party, as well as the voluntary representatives identified in sub-paragraphs 5.3 of this paragraph. 5.3. The Project Advisory Committee shall be chaired by an MCWD Manager selected by the MCWD Board of Managers, and shall consist of at least one citizen representative from Long Lake, Orono, and Medina, to be appointed by each city s respective City Council and to serve at the expense of each respective city. The Project Manager shall invite the following agencies to appoint one representative to serve on the Project Advisory Committee at each individual agency’s expense: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Department of Natural Resources - Department of Health - Department of Agriculture Hennepin Conservation District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish and WUdlife Service Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 27S/I407(e25 1/KW5 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council 5.4. Each party to this Agreement shall appoint one of its members to serve on the Public Education Sub-committee. All written, audio, or video public education materials prepared by t ;y party shall be presented to the Public Education Sub-committee for review and comment prior to their distribution; all educational materials distributed to the public must identify each party to this Agreement as a project sponsor. 6, Profect Manager 6.1. The MCWD Board of Managers shall be responsible for appointing the Project Manager, to serve at the MCWD’s expense. 6.2. The Project Manager shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Project; coordinating communication between the parties to this Agreement; and preparing quarterly progress reports to the Project Advisory Committee. 7. Dispute Resolution In the event that disputes arise between the parties with regard to rights and responsibilities under this Agreement, the parties agree to first attempt to resolve the dispute among themselves through discussions between their respective supervisory staff persons. If the dispute caimot be resolved in this manner, it shaU be referred to the Project Advisory Committee for resolution. If the dispute caimot be resolved in this manner, the parties agree to refer the dispute first to mediation and, if not successfully resolved at mediation, to binding arbitration. The mediator or arbitrator shall be selected by the following process. Each party 275/14070525 l/10yV5 to the Agreement shall propose two persons having specific expertise and knowledge relating to the specific issues in dispute, but who are not employees, consultants, or agents of any of the parties. In an order randomly assigned, each party may strike two names from the list, one at a time. The last person remaining on the list shall be the mediator or arbitrator. [Consider other alternatives.] 8. Termination and Renewal of Agreement This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2000, and may be renewed for another five year term by written agreement of all parties hereto. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by the written agreement of all parties hereto. 9. Amendments This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 10. Notice Notices to the parties to the Agreement shall be given by hand delivery or first class mail addressed to the following representatives of each party to this Agreement: [insert list] [Signatures] 275/14070525 WMi REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 20, < ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name John R. Gerhardson r- •* ,Ciry Administrator ’s Report Title Public Works Director Item Description: Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bid 1995 The City of Orono advenised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at 10:00 A.M. Friday, January 13, 1995. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. For comparison purposes I have also included a copy of the 1994 bid tabulation. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a iow bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year’s work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: I recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 1995. To: From: Date: Subject: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Jack Brinkhaus, Public Works Supervisor January 20, 1995 Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bid 1995 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, vith bid opening at 10:00 A.M. Friday, January 13, 1995. Tht enclosed ubulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. For comparison purposes I have also included a copy of the 1994 bid tabulation. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Travc'ing distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It ic possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when cc: .;ue-mg materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year ’s work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. I recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 1995. 1995 LIST OF MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT BIDDERS (Bids Received) ABM EQUIP & SUPPLY ATTN: M. MERILLAT 1670 SOUTH 2ND STREET HOPKINS MN 55343 ALLIED BLACKTOP 10503 89TH AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS BOX 73 CHASKA MN 55318 448-3985 BARTON CONSTRUCTION 10633 - 89TH AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 425-4191 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS P.O. BOX 215 SHAKOPEE MN 55379 445-1997 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 10633 - 89TH AVE N OSSEO MN 55369 424-5400 CONTECH CONSTR. PROD. ATTN: GREGG WRIGHT 11155 CHAPARRAL AVE SHAKOPEE MN 55379 496-1050 H.V. JOHNSTON CULVERT 3575 85TH AVE NE ST. PAUL MN 55126-1186 780-1760 WILLIAM MUELLER & SON 831 PARK AVENUE. BOX 247 HAMBERG MN 55339 445-1082 N.\DEAU UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 6615 HIGHWAY 12 INDEPENDENCE MN 55359 JOHN M. SCHOENING 2020 COUNTY ROAD 90 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 479-3216 STEPP MANUFACTURING 12325 RIVER RD NORTH BRAN 3H MN 55056 674-4491 LONG LAKE TRACTOR P.O. BOX 697 LONG LAKE MN 55356 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP P.O. BOX 5477 6350 INDUSTRIAL DR HOPKINS MN 55343 937-8033 CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABI 'LATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTHIf'S ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON PIT DEL. CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON RECYCLED PIT DEL. FA-2 CLASS C (SEAL COAT) TON PIT DEL. FA-1 (WINTER SAND) TON PIT DEL. Wm Mueller & Sons 3.21*6.81 6.99*10.59 1.93*5.53 Barton Sand & Gravel Co.3.35 5.65*3.46*5.86 7.67***10.07(***)*2.77 5.37* Midwest Asphalt Corp.3.69 5.80* Allied Blacktop 5.95 10.95 6.95 1 * Denotes low bid Modified to Barton specs 1 CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 1/2" CLEAN CRUSHED I.IMESiONE TON PIT DEL. 1 1/2" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL. 3/4" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL. 3/4" M CRUSHED L TO PIT INUS .IMESTONE IN DEL. Bryan Rock Products** 4.52 8.02 4.37 7.87 5.77 9.27 4.37 7.87 Wm Mueller & Sons 4.53*8.13*4.53* 8.13* 5.59*9.19*4.42*8.02* 1 Allied Blacktop 11.00 9.00 13.00 13.00 MC 30, 70, 250, 800 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED CRS- 1 & 2 GALLON PLANT DEL. &. PLACED RC 250-800 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED Win Mueller & Sons 1.86* Allied Blacktop 1.00*2.00(***)* ♦ Denotes low bid *♦ Add Minnesota Sales Tax *** 1000 gal min CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE PLANT 2331 AC TON DELIVERED PLACED PLANT 2331 MC TON DELIVERED PLACED Commercial Asphalt 22.00 Wm Mueller & Sons 18.53*22.53*25.93* Midwest Asphalt 22.68 26.65 26.00 izd PLANT 2341 AC TON DELIVERED PLACED PLANT 2341 MC TON DELIVERED PLACED Wm Mueller & Sons 18.53*22.53*25.93* Midwest Asphalt 22.68 26.65 26.00 Commercial Asphalt 22.00 Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN I ONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE MOD. FINE MIX MOD. FINE MIX 50-50 2341 AC 2341 .MC 2341 AC/MC TON TON TON PLANT DEL. PLACED PLANT DEL. PLACED PLANT DEL. PLACED Wm Mueller & Sons 19.64*23.64*27.00* Midwest Asphalt 23.75 27.75 27.00* Commercial Asphalt 23.00 •: Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" CMP 16 GAUGE 15" CMP 16 GAUGE 18" CMP 16 GAUGE 24" CMP 14 GAUGE 24" CMP 16 GAUGE 36" CMP 14 GAUGE 48" CMP 12 GAUGE ----------------- 1 60" CMP 10 GAUGE H.V Johnston**7.86 9.69 11.45 15.13*19.08 28.22 51.52 81.47 All Steel Product**7.25* 9.00*10.50*18.00 14.00*26.00* 49.00* - 80.00* Contech 9.05 11.20 13.35 21.50 17.60 32.00 58.25 90.75 ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 48" APRON 60' APRON 1 H.V. Johnston**38.00 47.00 65.00 95.00 266.00 598.00*1064.00 All Steel Products**35.00 45.00 60.00 90.00 260.00 600.00 1100.00 1 Contech 36.70*46.60*60.45*89.95*265.75*916.70 1110.80* 11 ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" BAND 15" BAND 18" BAND 24" BAND 36" BAND 48" BAND 60" BAND H.V. Johnston**7.86 9.69 11.45 15.13 28.22*77.58*122.21* All Steel Products**7.25* 9.00*10.50*14.00*40.00 80.00 150.00 Contech 9.05 11.20 13.35 17.60 32.00 87.40 136.10 Plus Minnesota Sales Tax CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTi riES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RAIE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Schoening Excavating 12 40.00* Allied Blacktop 11 43.00*18 53.00* ---------- - 1 Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO1995 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE BACKHOE BACKHOE BACKHOE PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Schoening Excavating '/2 50.00*%60.00* 3/4 TON PICKUP W/8 PLOW PER HOUR I Sclu>ening Excavating 34.00* jj Allied Blacktop 50.00 Denotes low bid WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Schoening Excavating 2 50.00*3 60.00* Allied Blacktop 4 85.00* Cl l Y or ORONO1994 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREEF MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT REN FAL AI.L QUAN FI FIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RA FE CITY OF ORONO 1994 BID TABULA! IONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANHTIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 1/2" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL. 1 1/2" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL. 3/4- CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL. 3/4* MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE ION PIT DEL. Bryan Rock Products 4.35 7.73 4.25 7.63 5.67 9.14 4.25 7.63 Wni Mueller & Sons 4.63 8.23 4.63 8.23 6.02 9.62 8.53 12.13 Shiely Co.5.40 10.41 4.60 8.30 6.05 11.00 4.60 7.14 Wm Mueller & Sons MC 30, 70. 250, 800 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED 1.86 CRS - 1 & 2 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED RC 250-800 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED CITY OF OKONO 1994 BID TABULATIONS FOR SI RLFF MATKRIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTH IES are bid in ions - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 PLANT 2331 AC TON DELIVERED PLACED PLANT 2331 MC TON DELIVERED PLACED Commercial Asphalt 20.10 Wm Mueller & Sons 17.64 21.24 25.24 Midwest Asphalt 22.68 26.65 26.00 PLANT 2341 AC TON DELIVERED PLACED 1>LAN1 2341 MC TON DELIVERED PLACED Wm Mueller & Sons 17.64 21.24 25.24 Midwest Asphalt 22.68 26.65 26.00 Commercial Asphalt 20.10 1 n CITY OF ORONO 1994 BID TABULA'riONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE Cl l Y OF ORONO 1994 BID TABULATIONS FOR STRFEI MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTI riES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ALL PRICF^ ro BE DELIVERED 12" CMP 16 GAUGE 15" CMP 16 GAUGE 18" CMP 16 GAUGE 24" CMP 14 GAUGE 24" CMP 16 GAUGE 36" CMP 14 r.Aiir.E 48" CMP n r.AMr:i: Contech 11.19 13.32 21.47 17.57 31.97 58.27 60" CMP in r! AI ir?n 90.74 ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 48" APRON 60" APRON II.V. Johnston 36.00 45.00 58.50 90.00 252.00 567.00 1008.00 All Steel Products 35.00 45.00 57.00 90.00 260.00 600.00 1100.00 Contech 36.68 46.59 60.43 89.94 265.77 573.56 1035.34 ALL PRICIiS 10 BE DELIVERED 12" BAND 15" BAND 18" BAND 24" BAND 36" BAND 48" BAND 60" BAND II.V. Juhnstun 7.40**9.12**10.80**14.24**39.84 73.02 115.02 All Steel Products 8.00 9.00 10.00 15.00 30.00 80.00 140.00 Contech 9.02 11.19 13.32 21.47 31.97 87.41 136.11 7" Wide CITY OF ORONO 1994 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUAN rn IKS ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RME TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PEP HOUR CY RATE TRUCK PER HOUR CY RATE 1 Schoening Excavating 12 40.00 Volkenant & Sons Inc.12 42.00 18 55.00 1 1 CITY OF ORONO 1994 BID tabula 1 IONS FOR SI REFI MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTI riES ARE BID IN IONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE BACKIIOE PER HOUR CY RAIE BACKIIOE PER HOUR RATE BACKIIOE PER HOUR CY RATE Schocning Excavating •A 50.00 %60.00 1 Volkenant & Sons Va 50.(X)75.00 3/4 TON PICKUP 1 W/8 PLOW PER HOUR | Schocning Excavating 34.00 1 WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER I PER HOUR CY RATE CY RA'IE CY RATE Schocning Excavating 2 50.00 3 60.00 Volkenant & Sons Vh 65.00 Recreational SuiTaccs 3 80.00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Januaryn?)^^ ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: / Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Time and Date of 1995 Board of Review Hearing The Council has indicated that 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 26 works as the time and date for the 1995 Board of Review hearing. It is necessary that the Council officially confum this date. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to schedule the 1995 Board of Review hearing for 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 26. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 20, 1995 ITEM NO: | * • % Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Resolution of Appreciation:Alexander Vongries At its January 9 meeting the Council accepted the resignation of Alexander Vongries from the Park Commission and directed staff to prepare a resolution of appreciation for Mr. Vongries’ service on the Park Commission. The resolution is attached for Council adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the resolution of appreciation for Alexander Vongries’ dedicated service as a member and co-chair of the Park Commission. CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION ALEXANDER VONGRIES PARK COMMISSION CO-CIIAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER WHEREAS, ilie City of Orono is a municipal organization existing under the laws of llte State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono relics on its citizens to participate in tlie orderly development of the City and its parks; and WHEREAS, Alexander Vongries became a Park Conunission Member on November 10, 1988 and was appointed as Co-Chair in July 1990 and served on the Park Commission in that position until December 9. 1994; and WHEREAS, Alexander Vongries was always willing to participate and assist in park projects with the goals of the City in mind. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its greatest appreciation for Alexander Vongries’ service and dedication to the City of Orono as a member and Co-Chair of the Park Commission. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 23rd day of January, 1995. Attest: Dorothy M. Ilallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; January 19, 1995 ITEM NO; j Department Approval; Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section; City Administrator’s Report Item Description; Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance Audit Cost Correction At its January 9 meeting the Council approved a contract for consulting services regarding an ADA compliance audit^at a cost not to exceed $4,775. In finalizing the agreement with the consultant it was discovered that the not-to-exceed cost amount was incorrect. The correct amount is $5,475. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve the proposal from Julee Quarve-Peterson to provide consulting services for the purpose of assisting the city in complying with the laws pertaining to the Americans with Disabilities Act at a cost not to exceed $5,475, to be funded from the special project contingency account. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1 V Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval r 't, DATE: j arm^Y/> 20 9 5 ITEM NO: / 3 ipZO, "S Agenda Section: Licenses There are no licenses. information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING (. j:^CILMEEnN6 I AM 3 1995 C!TY OF ORONO OF DRAFT MLNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 The Orono Plannina Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Charles Schroeder, Vice Chairman Steve Peterson. Candy Rowlette, Sandra Smith. Charles Nolan, Janice Bera. and Dale Lindquist. City staff was represented by Budding and Zoning Admim’strator Jeanne Mabusth and Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron Police Lt Gary Cheswick arrived at approximately 8:40 a.m. Applicant Dan Hessberg was represented bv consultant Margaret Webber, Judge Mary Davidson and Board Member Gre<r Sichender. 'Members of the public present included Rick Meyers of 2195 Bavview Place and John Ericson of 1620 Shadywood Road. City Councilmember JoEllen Hurt was also present. The work session was called to order by Chairman Schroeder at 7:57 a.m. Mabusth gave a brief overview of the request for approval of a battered women’s shelter in the former Grace Baptist Church near the intersection of Count>- Roads 15 and 19 in Navarre. She noted ^e site is zoned LR-IC Single Family Residential and exists adjacent to the B-1 Commercial Zonmg District. Mabusth noted the proposed site plan includes parking and a fumre playground area for the shelter She noted that no expansions of the existing building are proposed, although partitiomng of the interior is proposed to provide for office areas and 7-8 sleeping rooms. She indicated Aat space would be provided for small meeting rooms for counseling and job trainmg sessions. She further indicated that provisions would be made for school age children from both the Westonka and Orono school districts tc be picked up at the site. Mabusth indicated the work session outline is structured to first bring forward discussion regarding the namre of the proposed use, and secondly to consider the zonmg issues and compatability of that use in Orono. Dan Hessberg introduced himself as applicant ehalf of Westonka Intervention Project. He indicated that Westonka Intervention currently is a group of approximately 18 volunteers who at the request of local police departments intervene in cases of domestic abuse. He mdicated that domestic abuse victims are provided with one or more advocates who assist victum m understanding their options for dealing with their situation, assist them through counselmg, accompany them through the hearing processes, etc. Hessberg indicated that over the past u years they have found it impossible to place victims in a shelter due to lack of space m existmg shelters. Schroeder questioned how Westonka Interv'ention was funded. Hessberg replied that they were funded by the cities through Block Grant Funding and through various local organizations and private donations. He indicated they have an extremely limited budget at this time. Remming to the outline, Mabusth indicated that the proposed shelter would accommodate a number of functions, including group counseling sessions for up to 8 persons, monthly meetmg draft MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAN"NTNG COMMISSION \\ ORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 of the 15-member Board, job training sessions, individual counseling, day care for victims children, as well as counseling for community members not using the shelter for housing. She indicated that while 24 hour staffmg would be provided, there would be no staff members who reside at the site. She indicated that there would be a full-time e.xecutive director and additional professional full and part-time staffing. Mabusih provided an overhead listing the members of the Board of Directors. It was indicated that the majority of Board members were from the 7 cities served by Westonka Intervention, which include Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, Orono, Minnetonka Beach. Long Lake, Spring Park end Mound. Resident John Ericson. who owns vacant lots adjacent to the site, questioned hovv this activity would fit into the residential character of the adjoining neighborhood. Schroeder indicated that was an issue for discussion but would be considered later in the outline. Margaret Webber, the applicant’s consultant, arrived at approximately 8:20 a.m. Mabusth indicated that in 1990 the Legislature adopted regulations requiring police departments to establish procedures and policies for dealing with victims of domestic abuse. They also were required to send in reports to the Department of Corrections, wliich is the prime agency overseeing such shelters. The Department of Corrections reviews daily per diem budgets as well as budgets for facilities receiving grants. Webber indicated that in the case of Westonka Intervention, the Department of Corrections would be reviewing the Department of Human Services per diem reimbursements but Westonka Intervention will not be receiving a grant from the Department of Corrections. In response to Schroeder’s question, she indicated that she knew of no shelters which received neither a grant nor a per diem reimbursement. Rick Meyers of 2195 Bay view Place questioned whether the repor^ required of the Police Department suggest that there is a need for a shelter. Mabusth indicated that the Police Department s computer system cannot distinguish or track which cases have been referred to Westonka Intervention nor do the reports reveal which involved domestic violence. They ^e merely able to provide a list of general domestic abuse calls with no breakdown. Schroeder commented that Meyers ’ question relates to the need for a shelter, and that would be an item for discussion later in the outline. Schroeder followed up by asking Webber how the 199U Ie<»islation recarding procedures and policies was being fulfilled. Webber indicated that it was handled differently by different cities and she was not completely familiar with the vanous reporting procedures. Peterson suggested that perhaps the better source for data is e Department of Corrections. Mabusth presented an overhead supplied by the applicants with data for the Westonka area. Mabusth reiterated that there is no specific state legislation regulating or providing requirenrients for shelters. She noted that the Minnesota Association of Battered Women’s Shelters is a loose DRAFT MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANTsTNG COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 confederation of 20 Minnesota shelters, which sets their standards for training of volunteers, who makeup the majority of staffing for the shelters. Webber confirmed for Schroeder that the standards for shelters have evolved over 20 years as a result of formal or informal mteraction between people involved with shelters. There is no licensing mvolved with shelters except for the food service aspect. Schroeder asked whether the budget review by the Department of Corrections constituted an informal or "de facto" licensing. Webber was not famUiar with the depth of review provided bv the Department of Corrections in their budget review. She did indicate that a de facto li'censing probably exists when a county or state grant is involved since die contract for the grant specifies conditions. Lindquist requested that information regarding the Department of Corrections review process be provided. Webber acknowledged she would be “ending a seminar and would provide that information after attending. Schroeder reiterated that the Planning Commission is being asked to review an activity for which we have no baselme to compare ±e stmemre or activity happening within, and added that another agency s licensmg guildelines would provide that baseline. Mabusth confirmed that Westonka Intervention is a non-profit charitable organization. Webber confirmed that all e.xisting shelters are non-profit. Schroeder noted that shelters are one option for solving the abuse problem that exists. There may be other wavs such as housing victims in hotels or other tacilities. He requested that Webber describe the relationship between all of the various agencies who are involved m the domestic abuse problem. Mabusth indicated that there are no other local agencies Providing shelter in the area of the 7 cities Westonka Interv'ention serves. Rowlette questioned whether all 7 cities automatically call Westonka Intervention in dealing with domestic abuse situations^ Mabusth replied that her information is that the Orono Police might use Westonka Intemntion or mieht call Sojourner or Home Free, two shelters in neighboring cities to the east, if shelter was needed immediately since Westonka Intervention does not yet have that ability. Rowlette questioned whether she was interpreting correctly that the figures provided people who have wanted to get into shelters have not been able to because of the lack of in Siis^area. Webber commented that that may not be quite accurate, that the Orono a different relationship than some other Westonka cities with Westonka Mound and Minnetrista Police may use Westonka Intervention in most or all caKS wtere^ me Orono Police do not necessarily use them in every case. Webber continued >*“1 Mou^ Minnetrista Police over the last 10 years had never been able to place someone in Sojourner o Home Free due to a lack of available space. She noted that it is possible feat Orono “ as advocates themselves and contacted Sojourner or Home Free on their own uuiiative than involving somebody from Westonka Intervention. Rowlette requested that if possible a representative of the Orono Police Department be asked to come over to the meeting to describe their policies and procedures. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 It was noted that the Mound and Minnetrista Police may have had a policy of using Westonka even prior to the 1990 procedure mandate. Discussion ensued as to whether Orono ’s policies and procedures are similar to those of Mound and Minnetrista, or whether procedures are being followed. Mabusth noted that the law does not specifically require the use of an mtermediary. She indicated that the law required immediate action and required that a policy be in place, but does not require the use of a specific organization. Judoe Davidson indicated she had brought along some materials which she would leave related to domestic abuse laws. She indicated the law defines what police departments are supposed to do but not what happens if thev don ’t follow their adopted procedures. Peterson asked how are police departments held accountable for enforcing their own policies. Judge Davidson mdicated that in any bureaucracy it takes time to deal with issues and the Department of Corrections might not take any action unless there were complaints. It was concluded that discussion on how the Orono Police Department is dealing with domestic abuse policy would be suspended until the Police Department representative was available to comment. Continuina in the outline. Mabusth provided a list of the 20 shelters located throughout the state, mostly near larger populated areas. Planning Commission requested that this information be copied and provided to them. Peterson questioned what the capacity of shelters should for Minnesota ’s 4 million-plus population as compared to the existing capacity. Webber indicated that in most areas demand greatly exceeded capacity. Judge Davidson indicated that Hennepin County handles more than 10,000 hearings for protection in any given year, with a capacity of just 100 beds in the Cit^' of Minneapolis. Judge Davidson also noted that Orders for Protection often result in placement of conditions on the abuser rather than the victim, such as requirmg the abuser to have no contact or stay away from me victim. The shelters do provide a safe place for victims when such orders are not complied with Victims are at the highest risk tetween the time of abuse and the time a Protection Order is gr "..td, that is the time during which victuns are at greatest risk in need of safe housing. Many people find shelter with family members or through their own resources, but those that do not have those resources available need a place to go on a generally short-term basis. Schroeder questioned whether it would be possible to determine the number of people who don ’t have the resources or other means of shelter and would make use of Westonka’s proposed shelter. Judge Davidson replied that it is virtually impossible to come up with those numbers, and that because no shelter exists, many victims will remain in the abusive situation because they don ’t have another housing option. Gre<» Sichender indicated that with other shelters having to turn away 50% of their calls, it is likely that there are numbers of victims not finding shelter. Webber agreed, suggesting that it is likely that the majority of victims don ’t find shelter and remain in abusive situations. She referred to a recent news article regarding several women who had become murder victims as DRAFT MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANTJARY 6, 1995 a result of their abuser violating Protection Orders. It was also noted that while living with family is often an option, the abuser typically knows all of the victim’s family and has little problem finding the victim, hence staying with family is not always a good solution. Lt. Gary Cheswick of the Orono Police Depanment arrived and introduced himself. Lt Cheswick indicated that the State Stamtes require that certain procedures and policies be adopted and followed, and that the Orono Poli-* Department does follow the policies which they have adopted. Those policies include the ability of each officer to assess the specific situation, and victims are alwavs provided with an information card as a resource for phone numbers, who to contact for specific assistance, etc. Lt. Cheswick had provided a copy of the Police Department’s adopted policy to Mabusth and she read e.xcerpts from it. The policy requires that officers advise victims of their lesal rights, available shelters, and community services, and provide victims with copies of "Rights and Services for All Crime Victims". In determining the appropriate course of action in domestic abuse cases, the primary concern of the officer is protection of all from further acts of violence. Lt. Cheswick noted that each victim typically has some idea of how they want to handle the situation, and that each case is different. Peterson questioned whether the Police Depanment had transported any victim to any shelter within the last year. Lt. Cheswick indicated that in the past he personally had on occasion transported victims to Pioneer House but would have to check the computer listing to determine where other victims may have been taken. Rowlette questioned whether Orono Police are directed to involve an advocate from Westonka Intervention immediately for each domestic abuse situation. He indicated that the officers have the discretion to assess each situation individually and bring in a third party as necessary, but there is no specific policy directive mandating the use of Westonka Intervention or any third party. He indicated he would provide Mabusth with a copy of the information matenals provided to victims by the police. He further indicated that quite often in domestic abuse cases where the police are called, the abuser is taken to jaU which allows some time for the victim to consider options for action. Our police normally wUl discuss with the victim their options and assist victims in the options they choose. He noted that quite often in Orono, victims have their own avenues and resources for dealing with the situation and consequently do not request shelter. Lindquist asked whether the Orono Police had had difficulty' in locating shelter space for victms who need it. Lt. Cheswick replied that the Police Department has the availability of ^ee motels in the area and the cost for short-term stays in them by victims is paid for by es Hennepin Human Services if necessary. He also indicated that Sojourner and the Mission Home were additional options that could be used. DRAFT Rowlette asked what training is provided to the Orono Police Officers in regards to dealmg with domestic abuse situations. Lt. Cheswick replied that each officer receives tra^g when they are hired and that it is a Department mandate that onping traimng occur. He noted that m February the Department is scheduled to attend a training session in domestic abuse. JoEllen Hurr asked what additional assistance officers provide victims other than handing them a card with their rights and contact resources. Lt. Cheswick replied that quite often victims are in the police office, and that the officer will advise and assist them until they are in a position of safety, i.e. they may be transported if so requested to a safe location, then they are assisted in making the contacts they deem necessary. Lindquist questioned whether Lt. Cheswick felt a shelter in Orono would be of benefit. Lt. Cheswick noted that in some respects it would mean more work for the department, noting tha the number of police calls to the shelters in Plymouth and Minnetonka were sigmficant. Mabusth noted that many such calls were due to "suspicious activity", since the environment of a shelter is sensitive to intrusion by the victims’ abusers. This has lead to numbers of false alarm calls. She also noted that at one of the shelters located on a cul-de-sac m a middle clas neighborhood a large number of the calls were made by a single neighbor who was apparently adversely impacted by the activity, car parking, etc. generated by the facility. Lt. Cheswick noted that in many respects having a shelter in Orono would be helpful, in that it would provide a nearby location and an additional option for Schroeder questioned how many incidences of domestic abuse the Police Department responded to m a typical year. Lt. Cheswick indicated he would have to review the computer records, but that there are many different levels of domestic abuse, and he would have to do some research to present a c ear Dicture. Mabusth showed an overhead with information provided by the applicant reg^dmg die number of domestic abuse calls reported for Orono including its contract cities. Lt. ^heswic noted that those numbers were somewhat different than City records, and Webber noted that her numbers might be incorrect due to some errors. Schroeder indicated he had received some information from the Department of Correction indicating 19 incidents of domestic assault which Lt. Cheswick characterized as the senous incidents''in 1993, as opposed to somewhere in the range of 80 total domestic assault mcidents. Schroeder indicated he would provide his information to everyone. Schroeder reiterated that the reason for all of this discussion regarding the number of incidern ia to somehow establish wnether or not a need e.xists for the proposed shelter in r • Peterson asked, of the 78 incidents reported for 1993, does Lt. Cheswick have a sense manv I'ctually were referred to or transported to a shelter. Lt. Cheswick suggested the number was probably less than 10. Lt. Cheswick also noted that in his experience the DepaiOTent Ims mt had a problem getting people into safe housing when it was necessary, be it a shelter or a motel. He noted that he personally had not e.xperienced the inability to get a victim mto DRAFT MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAN^TNG COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 shelter. He indicated that motels were typically used on a 1-3 day basis, and shelters would likely be used for a longer term or when there was a question of safety for the victim, which was always of concern to the officer. He reiterated that quite often the abuser is arrested on a typical fifth decree assault and is jailed for up to 36 hours. Judge Davidson indicated that all custodies are reviewed on a daily basis and the Court will decide whether an abuser is released or not. Rowlette noted that information provided by the applicants regarding Sojourner indicated they turned away victims on a daily basis due to lack of space, but that the information she is hearing todav su^^^^ests someihina else. Lt. Cheswick replied that in Orono's experience, the police have always bVen able to find a spot in a shelter for a victim who needs it. although he would not dispute that on i given day a given shelter might very well be full to capacity Peterson questioned whether Orono ’s response was to hand the victim a card and do nothing more for the victim. Lt. Cheswick replied that that was not the case. Schroeder suggested that it is more likely that the perceived low numbers of abuse in Orono are a function of population numbers as compared to the population of the much larger cities of Plymouth and Minnetonka w^-re the two nearest shelters are located. It was suggested that while the mcidence of abuse on a per capita basis may be as high in Orono as it is in other places, the numbers requinng the use of a shelter are relatively low compared to the numbers of people from the city of Plymouth requiring shelter in any given year. Judee Davidson suggested that Sojourner and Mission Ho.uc be contacted and asked if they keep track of where their calls are coming from and if so, provide that information for us. Planmng Commission directed staff to do so. Peterson noted that he volunteers in a homeless shelter m Minneapolis and they turn away people every night. Webber indicated that in their contacts with shelters she was advised that there is more demand for space than they can handle. Webber also indicated she would provide information regarding numbers accepted and turned away from area shelters. Schroeder suggested it may be appropriate also to ask area churches for any information they have or any referrals they have made regarding domestic abuse. Judge Davidson commented that her information is that churches often tell the woman she is subservient to her husband and she should go home and take care of her family, rather than offering shelter or solutions. i> e did not expect much information would be supplied by churches. She suggested talking to e Department of Human Services. Candy Rowlette suggested contacting Interfaith Outreacti. Greg Sichender suggested contacting Pyramid, a mental health clinic in Minnetonka. PlMi^g Commission also requested that they be provided with copies of the cards provided by our Police Department. Discussion continued regarding the need for shelter in Orono. Mabusth indicated that Orono officers she interviewed consistently commented that Orono residents have their own resources draft IVIINXJTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 to deal with this matter. Lindquist commented that we should be looking at t^s m context of the general community, not just within Orono’s city boundaries. Mabusth agreed, and noted that the applicants acknowledge that, and have presented their application as being of benefit to the general Lake Minnetonk^ area. Mabusth noted that in her contacts with the Westonka and Orono school district personnel regarding this issue, they did not recognize city boundanes in dealing with the problem. Schroeder suggested that it is somewhat difficult for Orono s Planning Commission to look at the area-wide issue, although that is what is needed. Mabusth presented a map of the Lake area noting the Navarre location in relation to the area to be served. Not only the service area but the population served would be greatly increased by a shelter at this location, as compared to Westonka Intervention’s current service area which is general^ the northwesterly quadrant of Lake Minnetonka. Mabusth questioned whether the use of ^e shelter was limited to, or gave priority to. residents of the defined service area. Webber sug^^ested that the shelter would exist to serv'e its local community, but there certainly are informal agreements between shelters that encourage referrals to other shelters when one is full. Webber no"ted that the outreach and educational efforts, however, generally are confined to the service area. Turning to the funding issue, Schroeder asked how is the project funded, how much does it cost, where is the money going to come from. Webber advised that Westonka was approved for a $210,000 grant from the Minnesota Housing Authority. Schroeder asked whether Minnesota Housing Authority is the entity that funds most shelters. Webber replied no they haven’t traditionally funded shelters, and that is not necessanly part ot their mission. For various reasons, the MHA Board chose to fund a shelter in tlus rather t^ some other use. Webber noted that shelters in this area have traditionally been funded by the Department of Corrections, both from their State allocation and Federal monies. ApparenUy the current available funds are spoken for, but if the Legislature allocates more money to the Department of Corrections, there may be competitive requests for use of that additional allocation. She noted that shelters generally rely on their per diem as reviewed by th Department of Human Services. Mabusth confirmed that the per diem is funding administered by Department of HumM Seiwices over which the Department of Corrections does budgetary review. Hessberg noted W«to^ Webber noted that Westonka Intervention would have to foUow a similar track as other non profit organizations preparing a plan for fund raising from all of the potential sources. She a so has suggested that over time Westonka Intervention develop a political strategy to convmce County Commissioners to allocate funding. 8 draft MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 6, 1995 Schroeder questioned whether there is a mandate that cities provide funding for shelters. Webber replied no, but their experience has been that the cities served typically contribute from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars each on a yearly basis. Schroeder asked whether it was possible for a shelter to "fail", i.e. run out of money. Webber noted that yes, shelters are non-profit business, and businesses can fail. However, she indicated that her e.xperience has been that if an operation that is providing a service fails, then other organizations who wish to see that service continued will step in. Schroeder asked what is the bissest risk facuis Westonka Intervention with this project. Webber suggested that balanced staffing is critical, especially in this size an operation. She noted that the Executive Director is typically the hiahest paid staff person, who is hired by the Board. The Executive Director hires staffing as budgeted by the Board, and the exact level of staffing for the proposed shelter has not been finalized yet. Schroeder suggested this was probably a good place to stop for today and reconvene at a later date. John Ericson, adjacent property owner, commented that while he has no specific objections to the shelter use and understands what is proposed, he would object to a rezoning of the property to commercial, which would open the door for commercial uses should the shelter become defunct. He noted that the church existed as a conditional use in this residential zone for many years, and he would object to the property being rezoned commercial. Rick Meyers commented that rezoning to allow commercial uses might result in a lucrative financial situation for the shelter should it fail and sell to a commercial user. Schroeder replied that that is a valid issue and will be the subject of future discussions. Judge Davidson provided a video tape to staff for review regarding domestic abuse. The next work session on this topic was set for Friday, January 20, 7:45 a.m. in the Council Chambers. The meeting was adjourned at 9:47 a.m. Charles J. Schroeder, Chairman JIM RAMSTAD THIRD DISTRICT. MINNESOTA JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE January 10, 1995 of i^epredentatibeft JBasfiington, JOC 20515-2303 322 CAiitiOW HOMU OVMQ 1 WhMmrnenm. DC 20S1S-230J (2021 22S-217I Mnucr 1120 PtM awmmc SmtfH. #1S2 tiOOMMSToii. Mfi SS431 (•121 ••1-4000 Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Dorothy: This is to confiim my office ’s recjuested use of the Orono City Council Chambers from 6 to 9 p.m. on Wednesday, April 12, 1^5, for a town meeting. The town meeting will actually start at 7 p.m. and conclude at 8 p.m., but we would like the use of the chambers for three hours to allow for an efficient amount of set-up and clean-up time. A staff member from my office will pick up a key on the 12th, before 4:30 p.m. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Shari Nichols in my Bloomington office at 881-4600. Thank you in advance for your assistance. S^erely, STAD MdAiber of Congress JR:sn ■JAN 1 2 1995 C... PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER EPORT NBR. b..J^ISS-l »ATB OP RUM 01/03/95PEmiTS ISSUED/FEES COU-ECTEDERMIT TYPEmilding :gl family -new :P-ADD/REMODEL :F-ACC structure NST-ADD/REMODEL tub-total QTY 3 7 1 1 12* PERMIT IS^i-tsb REPORT CITY OP ORONO DEXrEMBER 1994 PAGE: 1REQUESTER! LIN-- CURRENT RANGE - 12/01/94 - 12/31/94 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 12/01/93 - 12/31/93BASE FEE 3,626.50 862.00 31.00 491.00 5,010.50* VALUATION 780,000.00 74.350.00 1,250.00 66.750.00 930,350.00* PLAN REVIEW2,357.23 507.65 20.15 319.15 3,204.18* QTY2 4 1 1 8* BASE FEE1,502.00 657.00 90.00 190.00 2,447.00* VALUATION263,050.00 61,000.00 6,650.00 10,500.00 350,000.00* PLAN REVIEW976.30 427.05 58.50 128.70 1,590.55* lechanical (EATING SYSTEMS 26 3,127.73 240,758.00 0.00 15 1,797.54 140,603.00 0.00 f\ 0\ ilk vIR CONDITIONING 1 237.50 19,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREPLACE 2 231.25 18,500.00 0.00 8 403.75 24,022 49 0.00 0% 0% 0^ 'BNTILATION 2 103.75 6,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0*00 ;AS line INSPECT 2 70.00 2,500.00 0.00 1 35.00 450.00 0.00 )UCT WORK ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 980.00 0.00 tub-total 33*3,770.23*286,758.00*0.00*25*2,271.29*166,055.49*0.00* ’lumbing IXTURES 6 875.94 65,725.00 0.00 10 950.49 70,914.00 0.00 ;ater meter 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 133.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 6*875.94*65,725.00*0.00*11*1,083.49*70,914.00*0.00* Sewer 6 Water SEWER CONNECTION 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 10 350.00 0.00 0.00 iEW SEPTIC SYSTE 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 SAC ONLY 2 800.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 0 • 00 SEWER DISCONNECT 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEWER & WATER 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 . uO Sub-total 9*1,145.00*0.00*0.00*13*450.00*0.00*0.00* 'Sign TEMPORARY 3 90.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 ^ub-total 3*90.00*0.00*0.00*1*30.00*0.00*0.00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*0.00*0.00*0.00*1*50.00*0.00*0 • 00* Grand-total 64**10,891.67**1,282,833.00**3,204.18**59**6,331.78**586,969.49**1,590.55** ‘ I* •REPORT NBR. BPBERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 01/03/95PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECfED*••** PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/94 TO 12/31/94 OECEMQER 1994 PAGE: 28REQUESTERI LINi I BUILDING MECHATUCAL PLUMBING SEWER 6 WATER USER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE 5,010.50 3,770.23 875.94 1,145.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 3,204.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 465.19 144.49 33.24 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 800.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION 1,708.10 38.90 1.50 HATER CONNECTION 1,933.00 PERMIT TOTAL 13,120.97 3,953.62 910.68 1,948.50 0.00 90.OC 0.00 -Twfll'WV' ••• REPORT NBR. WiiERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 01/03/95 •* PERMIT Fbo' REPORT *• CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/94 TO 12/31/94 -^PAGE: 29 REQUESTER: LIN REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 10,891.67 PLAN REVIEW 3,204.18 SURCHARGE 646.42 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 SAC 1,600.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION 40.40 1,708.10 1,933.00 PERMIT TOTAL 20,023.77 9,\^S. 33:41 PM PAGEDECniDER 1994ISSUED -i ERM1T8 ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF ERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET SOMERSET LA 01 3026 CASCO POINT RD 01 2320 SHADOWOOD DR 02 3100 RIDGEWOOD CIR 02 755 FERNDALE RD N 05 925 BROWN RD N 06 2610 MAPLERIDGE LA 11 50 FYRTLEWOOD RD 20 795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 29 884 DAKOTA AVE 29 2606 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 30 1580 FOX ST 12C 94/12/06 94/12/16 94/12/19 94/12/07 94/12/20 94/12/22 94/12/02 94/12/14 94/12/27 94/12/21 94/12/22 94/12/01 PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY STICKNEY AND SCHWARZOR-006602 OR-006604 OR-006716 OR-006683 OR-006717 OR-006732 OR-006673 OR-006710 OR-006733 OR-006730 OR-006731 OR-006674 14766768 00000000 14277903 19349423 19345904 14792495 00000000 14733397 14791961 00000000 14724118 00000000 RKO HOMEBUILDERS INC METRO PRAIRIE CONSTRUCTION VIRG LUKEN 6 ASSOCIATES DONALD AHLSTROM PLYMOUTH ROOFING AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCT CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. 33C )1 255 31 625 31 4135 31 855 D1 290 01 3020 01 650 01 120 01 2860 01 4116 01 825 01 3490 01 980 01 290 01 3020 01 290 01 2800 02 2565 02 4109 02 500 02 3100 03 40 07 2687 19 795 24 3264 24 345 24 511 24 3225 24 650 24 220 24 105 2S 550 33C 01 255 01 290 01 2800 19 2687 20 795 TONKA AVE BROWN RD S SPRING HILL RD BAYSIDE RD PARTENWOOD LA WOODHILL RD SOMERSET LA GANDER RD TRUFFULA TR DEER RUN TR HIGHWOOD RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD BIRCH LA COX FARM RD WOODHILL RD SOMERSET LA WOODHILL RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W DUNWOODY AVE HIGHWOOD RD TONKAWA RD RIDGEWOOD CIR ORONO ORCHARD RD N WAYZATA BLVD W OLD CRY.STAL BAY RD NORTH SHORE DR SPRING HILL RD FERNDALE RD N 6TH AVE N TONKAWA r.D STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO ORCHARD RD t TONKAWA RD 94/12/01 94/12/02 94/12/00 94/12/08 94/12/08 94/12/08 94/12/00 94/12/08 94/12/08 94/12/08 94/12/08 S 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/08 94/12/09 94/12/14 94/12/21 94/12/19 94/12/21 94/12/29 94/12/29 94/12/00 94/12/00 N 94/12/21 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/00 94/12/21 94/12/21 I 94/12/21 94/12/02 OR-006672 OR-006676 OR-006605 OR-006686 OR-006687 OR-006608 OR-006690 OR-006691 OR-006696 OR-006697 OR-006690 OR-006699 OR-006700 OR-006702 OR-006703 OR-006704 OR-006711 OR-006729 OR-006720 OR-006725 OR-006739 OR-006740 OR-006695 OR-006693 OR-006727 OR-006675 OR-006676 OR-006679 OR-006701 OR-006723 OR-006726 OR-006728 OR-006677 36025295 39296767 39414211 39414211 39414211 39414211 35421166 35421166 34625702 30940005 34748366 39296767 30019000 34988071 35360035 35291273 34701112 34932477 34282026 37576200 39411044 34741725 34461299 26087802 39296767 00000000 39296767 34761990 38242656 34458585 39296767 34240333 39296767 VARNER SHEET METAL VOGT FRED U CO KLEVE HTG & AC KLEVE HTG & AC KLEVE HTG k AC KLEVE HTG k AC FLARE HTG k AC FLARE HTG k AC JIM SWEENEY SERVICE BURNSVILLE HEATING CO ABEL HEATING INC VOGT FRED k CO SEDGWICK HTG k AC CO WEST AIR COMFORT MECH MCBRICK INC LARSON MASONRY HEATING k COOLING TWO PRACTICAL SYSTEMS BLAINE HTG AC k ELEC INC CENTRAIRB INC MERIT HVC INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG k COOLING BEST MECHANICAL VOGT FRED k CO VOGT FRED S> CO HOME ENERGY CENTER STANDARD HTG k AC CO RON'S MECH INC VOGT FRED k CO ROYALTON HTG St COOLING VOGT FRED St CO OWNER LAST NM VALUATION425,000.00 WOLD 180,000.00 REHBEIN 183,000.00 CASHIN 12,000.00 MITHUN 8,000.00 COX 11,800.00 GERARD 11,250.00 CHAMPLIN 5,300.00 66,750.00 GASNER 1,000.00 EKHOLM 25,000.00 MACMILLAN 1,250.00 MCCARTY 6.625.00 16,000.00 27,000.00 2.500.00 GUL 1.400.00 19.000. 00 14.000. 00 7.700.00 MARSHALL 5,750.00 ANDREA 5,400.00 OTTO 4,500.00 DAYTON 65,000.00 5,000.00 4,800.00 O'MALLEY 21,000.00 10,000.00 8.500.00 4.700.00 BROWN RD S WOODHILL RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W WAYZATA BLVD W OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 94/12/15 OR-006713 94/12/19 OR-006719 94/12/28 OR-006735 94/12/05 OR-006681 94/12/15 OR-006714 24731657 29383509 24432921 26887082 24546645 FADDEN CLIFF k SONS STANDARD PLBG k APPL CO SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG BEST MECHANICAL DAKOTA PLBG St HTG BIELKE APPLEBAUM NELSON CASHIN STRUYK NORUM FELDMAN PFLEIDER HEUPBL ADIR BOLLIS KBLLBNBBRGER CARLSON COST EIDEN 10,880.00 13,600.00 500.00 4,688.00 2,200.00 5.500.00 1.100.00 1.250.00 4.475.00 2.490.00 .00 3,000.00 1,000.00 6.900.00 10.500.00 29.700.00 9,275.00 250.00 15,000.00 MON, JAN 9, 1995, 3i41 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF DE PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 23Ei’v 1994 ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 29337200 CULLIGAN, i 00000000 1 WEEKS .00 00000000 1 . 00 00000000 BLOOMQUIST .00 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WOLD .00 00000000 OLSON • 00 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC OLSON • 00 59723521 HAYES EXCAVATING a 0 0 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC • 0 0 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC • 0 0 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC MORRISON • 0 0 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC . 00 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES 81 4 INC MORRISON .00 00000000 oo•PL 29 3580 BAYSIDE RD SC6C SI 13 3609 SHORELINE DR 19 2395 BLAINE AVE 19 3333 SHORELINE DR 3C 3C SW 01 1760 CONCORDIA ST 01 3640 BAYSIDE RD 01 3640 BAYSIDE RD 01 2990 SOMERSET LA 01 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 01 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 01 3280 NORTH SHORE DR•29 3510 BAYSIDE RD 29 3510 BAYSIDE RD 9C 9C UD 20 1355 BROWN RD S 1C 1C G4C 94/12/02 OR-006680 94/12/1? OR-006707 94/12/14 OR-006700 94/12/1? OR-006718 94/12/14 94/12/16 94/12/20 94/12/20 94/12/29 94/12/29 94/12/29 94/12/12 94/12/12 OR-006709 OR-006715 OR-006721 OR-006722 OR-006736 OR-006737 OR-006738 OR-006705 OR-006706 94/12/29 OR-006742 1,282,833.00* 01 02 01 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 a 12 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 n 22 21 99 9999 WORK TYFR CODB Residence Addition Gara9c/Attached Garage/Detached Porch Deck Fence Gazebo Pool Re-side Re-roof Tennis Court Sign Dock ' Shed Demo-Principal Structure Dcmo-Acccssory Structure Move Conmiercial Institutional Storm Damage Repair 1-100 Cubic yards 101 Cubic Yards or More UndeTined LCXIM* USB CODES Undefined 24 Replacing Existing 25 Lifting Principal Residence 26 Well Abandonment 27 Foundation Only 28 Temporary Trailer 29 Renovate/Remodel 30 Accessory Structure 31 Stairway to Lake 32 Retaining Wall 33 Entrance Monuments 34 Tree Removal FRImJANUfl .NUMERICAL LISTING PERMIT NBR ISSUED 9tia AM DECEMBER 1994CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET vJ PAGE 1WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONMCCARTY6,625.00 GERARD 11,250.00 MACMILLAN • 1,250.00 NORUM 1,100.00 16,000.00 CARLSON 6,900.00 FELDMAN 1,250.00 PFLEIDER 4,475.00 NORTON 1,000.00 250.00 KRAMER 425,000.00 CASHIN 12,000.00 WOLD 100,000.00 27,000.00 2,500.00 GUL 1.400.00 19.000. 00 14.000. 00 7.700.00 2.200.00 STRUYK 4,688.00 MARSHALL 5,750.00 ANDREA 5,400.00 OTTO 4,500.00 DAYTON 65,000.00 5,000.00 HEUPEL 2.490.00 4.800.00 O'MALLEY 21,000.00 10,000.00 MORRISON .00 MORRISON .00 . 00 WEEKS .00 WOLD .00 CHAMPLIN 5.300.00 8.500.00 COST 10,500.00 15,000.00 OLSON .00 REHBEIN 183,000.00 MITHUN 8,000.00 BLOOMQUIST .00 29,700.00 BIELKE 300.00 OLSON .00 .00 ADIR .00 APPLEBAUM 10,880.00 BOLLIS 3,000.00 5,500.00 KELLENBERGER 1,000.00 4,700.00 GASNER 1,000.00 OR-006672 OR-006673 OR-006674 OR-006675 OR-006676 DR-006677 DR-006670 DR-006679 DR-006600 DR-006601 DR-006602 DR-006603 OR-006604 OR-006605 OR-006606 OR-006607 OR-006600 OR-006690 OR-006691 OR-006693 OR-006695 OR-006696 OR-006697 OR-006690 OR-006699 OR-006700 OR-006701 OR-006702 OR-006703 OR-006704 OR-006705 OR-006706 OR-006707 OR-006700 OR-006709 OR-006710 OR-006711 OR-006713 OR-006714 OR-006715 OR-006716 OR-006717 OR-006710 OR-006719 OR-006720 OR-006721 OR-006722 OR-006723 OR-006725 OR-006726 OR-006727 OR-006720 OR-006729 OR-006730 94/12/01 94/12/02 94/12/01 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/02 94/12/05 94/12/06 94/12/07 94/12/16 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/00 94/12/09 94/12/12 94/12/12 94/12/13 94/12/14 94/12/14 94/12/14 94/12/14 94/12/15 94/12/15 94/12/16 94/12/19 94/12/20 94/12/19 94/12/19 94/12/19 94/12/20 94/12/20 94/12/21 94/12/21 94/12/21 94/12/21 94/12/21 94/12/21 94/12/21 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 245 2610 1500 3264 255 550 345 511 3580 2607 2990 3100 3026 625 4135 055 290 3020 650 2687 40 120 2860 4116 825 3490 3225 900 290 3020 3510 3510 3609 2395 1760 50 290 255 795 3640 2320 755 3333 290 2565 3640 2990 650 4109 220 795 105 2800 884 TONKA AVE MAPLERIDGE LA FOX ST NORTH SHORE DR BROWN RD S TONKAWA RD SPRING HILL RD FERNDALE RD N BAYSIDE RD WAYZATA BLVD W SOMERSET LA RIDGEWOOD CIR CASCO POINT RD SPRING HILL RD BAYSIDE RD PARTENWOOD LA WOODHILL RD SOMERSET LA GANDER RD WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO ORCHARD RD N TRUFFULA TR DEER RUN TR HIGHWOOD RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD BIRCH LA 6TH AVE N COX FARM RD WOODHILL RD SOMERSET LA BAYSIDE RD BAYSIDE RD SHORELINE DR BLAINE AVE CONCORDIA ST MYRTLEWOOD RD WOODHILL RD BROWN RD S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD BAYSIDE RD SHADOWOOD DR FERNDALE RD N SHORELINE DR WOODHILL RD DUNWOODY AVE BAYSIDE RD SOMERSET LA TONKAWA RD HIGHWOOD RD STUBBS BAY RD N OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO ORCHARD RD N COUNTRYSIDE DR W DAKOTA AVE 01 06 30 24 01 29 ^^44^' 24 29 19 01 02 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 07 03 01 01 01 01 01 24 01 01 01 29 29 13 19 01 11 01 01 20 01 01 02 19 01 02 01 01 24 02 24 I 19 24 01 29 36025295 00000000 00000000 00000000 39296767 39296767 39296767 34761990 29337200 26807002 14766760 19349423 00000000 39414211 39414211 39414211 39414211 35421166 35421166 26007002 34461299 34625702 30940005 34740366 39296767 30019000 30242656 34900071 35360035 35291273 54734300 54734300 00000000 00000000 24724959 14733397 34701112 24731657 24546645 00000000 14277903 19345904 00000000 29303509 34202026 54734300 59723521 34450585 37576200 39296767 39296767 34248333 34932477 00000000 VARNER SHEET METAL VOGT FRED (t CO VOGT FRED & CO VOGT FRED fit CO HOME ENERGY CENTER CULLIGAN BEST MECHANICAL STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ METRO PRAIRIE CONSTRUCTION & & fit fit fit fit AC AC AC AC AC AC KLEVE HTG KLEVE HTG KLEVE HTG KLEVE HTG FLARE HTG FLARE HTG BEST MECHANICAL COUNTRYSIDE HTG fit COOLING JIM SWEENEY SERVICE BURNSVILLE HEATING CO ABEL HEATING INC VOGT FRED fit CO SEDGWICK HTG fit AC AC CO COSTANDARD HTG WEST AIR COMFORT MECH MCBRICK INC SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS PLYMOUTH ROOFING LARSON MASONRY FADDEN CLIFF fit SONS DAKOTA PLBG fit HTG RKO HOMEBUILDERS INC VIRG LUKEN fit ASSOCIATES STANDARD PLBG fit APPL CO PRACTICAL SYSTEMS SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC HAYES EXCAVATING RON'S MECH INC BLAINE HTG AC fit ELEC INC VOGT FRED fit CO VOGT FRED fit CO ROYALTON HTG fit COOLING HEATING fit COOLING TWO FRI, JAN 6, 1995, 9:18 AMNUMERICAL LISTING DECEMBER 1994 PAGE 2PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-006731 94/12/22 N 2606 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 29 14724110 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC.EKHOLM 25,000.00 OR-006732 94/12/22 N 925 BROWN RD N 05 14792495 DONALD AHLSTROM COX 11,000.00 OR-006733 94/12/27 N 795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 20 14791961 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCT 66,750.00 OR-006735 94/12/28 N 2800 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24432921 SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG EIDEN 9,275.00 OR-006736 94/12/29 N 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 01 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC .00 OR-006737 94/12/29 N 3266 NORTH SHORE DR 01 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC .00 OR-006730 94/12/29 N 3200 NORTH SHORE DR 01 54461495 WIDMER BROS INC .00 OR-006739 94/12/29 N 500 TONKAWA RD 02 39411044 CENTRAIRE INC NELSON 13,600.00 OR-006740 94/12/29 N 3100 RIDGEWOOD CIR 02 34741725 MERIT HVC INC CASHIN A 500.00 OR-006742 94/12/29 N 1355 BROWN RD S 20 00000000 1 i *».00 64C (EPORT NBR lATB OP RUN/• •m._ 4TI88-1 01/13/95 ZUUNG PUCUTS ILiiiULU/lLLiii V.ULLLlTLU / , i .<*••** PERMIT REPORTCITY OF ORONO LJJHil-I: •BRMIT TYPE * t 'ser Defined UBDIVISION ARIANCE UP* P.CATION ub*total Qiy 0 1 2 1 4* irand-total REPORT NBR. ^FEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 01/13/95 PAGE:REQUESTER: LIN-- CURRENT 12/01/94 -RANGE - 12/31/94 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 12/01/93 - 12/31/93BASE FEE VALUATIC.^PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0 200 400 175 775 00 00 00 00 00* 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 5 1 0 8* 2,900.00 975.00 125.00 0.00 4,000.00* 775.00**0.00**0.00*»8**4,000.00** ***** PERMIT-r-eiE REPORT * *** CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/94 TO 12/31/94 • •USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 775.00 775.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE C .00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 775.00 775.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00**0.00** PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN I 4 #LLti'*^LL^ f L ^ V & il a 4S. X I «•^PORT'HaR. BtWmS3-l \TB OP RUN 01/09/95!.:rmit type» illding ;l family -new IPLEX-NBM "-ADD/REMODEL ’-ACC STRUCTURE :M0/PRINCIPAL JM-ADO/REMCDEL •:mo 'IST-AOD/REMODEL MST-ACC STRUCT F-LAND ALT NST-LAND ALT LAN REVIEW ONLY EMO-ACCESSORY CC/OARAGES ub-total lechanical BATING SYSTEMS ,IR CONDITIONING ■OOD STOVE/FLUB TRBPLACB 'ENTILATION UEL STORAGE :AS LINE INSPECT iU<rr WORK ONLY '.EMOVE OIL TANK INUBFINED >ub-total PlumbliK J’IXTUREi SPRINKLER /lATBR METER REPLACE METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer A Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE ORNFLD fc/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER ti WATER Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED PER./FREE STANDG QTY 36 1 215 32 IS 9 0 5 3 1 0 1 PERMIT ^sWsG REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE 01/01/94 - 12/31/«4BASE FEE 54.125.00 15.00 28.541.00 3,793.00 790.00 738.00 0.00 1,633.50 360.00 54.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 VALUAITON 12,795,316.00 51)0.00 2,961,906.80 376.150.00 0.00 52.900.00 0.00 195.990.00 29.800.00 2,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 3,297.00 355,810.00 345*93,436.50*16,771,010.80* IOC 9,950.09 766,687.04 9 652.39 45,616.00 3 151.25 10, .too .00 43 2,426.25 157, 739.16 3 130.75 7,150.00 1 35.00 2,000.00 14 490.00 10,505.00 6 237.50 9,535.00 17 713.75 30,010.00 2 499.56 39,925.00 198*15,294.54*1,000,n58.00* 13A 10,261.69 679,006.69 1 35.00 150.00 11 2,015.00 . .00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 •100.00 147*12,346.69*J,156.69* 38 1,330.00 0.00 7 245.00 0.00 41 4,050.00 0.00 3 200.00 0.00 25 17,600.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 0.00 5 350.00 0.00 122*23,880.00*0.00* 3 130.00 3,200.00 1 39.00 1,200.00 PLAN REVIEW 35,181.36 0.00 1j,006.03 2.356.92 0.00 204 .75 0.00 641.23 234.00 35.10 0.00 1.211.93 0.00 2,203.46 56,034.70‘ 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 ,00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00o.co QTY 41 0 215 24 10 4•X 7 1 1 1 1 13 20. 339* 137 1 12 1 2 153* 70 2 20 10 49 1 0 7 159* PAGE! 1REQUE.STER: LIN-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 12/31/93BASE FEB 49,303.00 0.00 48,469.50 3,158.50 530.00 234.00 30.00 3,145.00 330.00 126.00 0.00 0.00 455.00 3,776.50 109,557.50* VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0.00 101 12,620.71 0.00 10 474.31 0.00 2 65.00 0.00 54 2,549.04 0.00 6 210.00 0.00 1 639.11 0.00 9 305.00 0.00 16 639.00 0.00 10 627.50 0.00 1 35.00 0.00*210*10,164.67* 13,440.32 35.00 2,410.00 0.00 70.00 15,955.32* 2,439 70 2,000 550 30,750 50 0 490 36,349 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50* 11,077,235.00 0.00 9,015,720.44 307.365.00 0.00 12.308.00 0.00 558.600.00 37,000.00 10.245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 515.970.00 21,534,443.44* 893,407.00 31.365.00 3.400.00 130,909.65 6.250.00 51.129.00 3.375.00 26.552.00 34,129.59 1.900.00 1,190,417.24* 924,353.10 150.00 600.00 0.00 950.00 926,053.10* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 31,949.58 0.00 26,329.68 1,991.29 0.00 111.15 0.00 1,537.91 214.50 81.90 0.00 984 .43 0.00 2,405.98 65,606.42* 1 0 35.00 0.00 1,200.00 »'.00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 * w 1REPORT NBR. BPRMTIS9-1 DATE OP RUN 01/03/95 PU<M1TS iSSUED/Flii> LULUM ’il)PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO YEAK-TU-lJHiii PAGEI 2 REQUESTERI LIN»; f 1 -- CURRENT 01/01/94 -RANGE - 12/31/94 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 12/31/93PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN RBVIENTEMPORARY8240.00 0.00 0.00 IBS.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 1 » 12*409.00*4,400.00*0.00*7*220.00*1,200.00*0.00*• Pir« LAWN SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 385.00 0.00 0.00 FIRE SPRINKLER 1 187.50 15,000.00 0.70 1,48.00 2,400.00 31.20 Sub-total 1*187.50*13,000.00*0.00*12*433.00*2,400.00*31.20* Usar Defined LAND ALTERATION 12 650.00 0.00 0.00 14 750.00 0.00 0.00 99 99 99 TREE REMOVAL 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 RETAINING NALLS 3 143.00 7,500.00 0.00 1 117.00 9,700.00 0.00 99 99 99 LAHN SPRINKLER 12 420.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0*00 Sub-total 31*1,333.00*7,500.00*0.00*21*1,067.00*9,700.00*0.00* Grand-total 856**146,887.23**18,558,125.49**56,034.78**901**181,746.99**23,664,213.78**65,637.62** I 1* EPORT HBR- Wu4 rPT2-1 ATS.OF RUtr 01/03/9Sl.N iV* i' ’ • Iit* ;^SB FEB LL»i^i±xu liAN REVIEW URCHARGB IC. SEARCH FEB AC i NVESTIGATION BP08IT AIL IN NGINEERING FEES TAFF FEES lAIL IN FEE ’ARIANCE FEE AFTER THE FACT) iBHER CONNECTION lATER CONNECTION 175.00 6,421.10 1,933.00 PERMIT TOTAL 174,093.62 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 01/03/95 BASE FEB PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEB SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT REPORT TOTAL 146.8B7.23 56,034.78 9,266.56 0.00 10,400.00 2,186.00 0.00 MAIL IN ENGINEERING FEES STAFF FEES MAIL IN FEB VARIANCE FEB (AFTER THE FACT) SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION 229.85 187.25 120.00 1.50 175.00 6,421.10 1,933.00 rrjn.ij-" TOTAIi 233,042.27 •* PERMIT KEruKl •*CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 '^I’AGE:REQUESTERS LINBUILDINGMECHAIUCALPLUMBINGSEWER k HATER USER SIGN FIRB93,436.50 15.294.54 12.346.69 23.880.00 1,333.00 409.00 187.50 56,034.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,307.24 547.11 349.46 46.50 6.75 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,600.00 0.00 0.00 4.600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154.85 J6 .CO l.bO 3.00 187.25 120.00 4.50 1.50 15,996.50 12,763.65 29,038.75 1,344.25 409.00 196.50 i »*t t PERMIT FEE REPORT •* CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 PAGES REQUESTERS LIN |v.; ZONING'.REPORT NBRwPRMTISS-1 PEBMITS ISSIED/FEES CXDLI.B3TOD PERMIT >w<UED REPORT • DATE OP RUN • 01/13/95 CITY OF ORONOu,W:-- CURRENT RAU'.-E - 01/01/94 - 12/M/94 *1 YEAR-TO-DATE •. •M" •)PAGE: 1REQUESTER: LIN-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 12/31/93PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VAI.UATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW»Uaer Defined %• SUBDIVISION 12 9,275.00 0.00 0.00 l5 7,700.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 48 9,475.00 0.00 0.00 63 11,725.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 19 3,250.00 0.00 0.00 17 3,075.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 3 600.00 0.00 0 .Cw 4 1,150.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 6 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 1 175.00 0.00 0.00 5 975.00 0.00 0.00 APPEAL 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMP PLAN AMEND 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 11 • ^ 90*23,075.00*0.00*0.00* 106*25,205.00*0.00*0.00* I Grand-total i 1 » \ iM • 90^*23,075.00**0.00**0.00**106**25,205.00**0.00**0.00*‘ REPORT NBRs^FEERPT2-l DATE OF RUN 01/13/9‘i ***** PERMIT'-.-uE REPORT *♦ CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 USER REPORT TO'IAL BASE FEE 23,075.00 23,075.no PLAN REVIEW C.OO 0 . no SURCHARGE 0.00 0 70 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 O.nn SAC 0.00 0 no INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0. no PERMIT TOTAL 23,075.00 23,075.00 ^ PAGE; REQUESTER: LIN r • *'*4 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIESJanuary February March April June July August Septenber October Noveaiier Deceaber tTD lotaltVi*I»l. :J Spring ParkPlan Review 0.00 0.00 46.00 0.00 332.00 144.95 277.25 OaOO 40.95 29SA2 1.013.36 0.00 842.75Inspections165.00 165.00 30.00 105.00 75.00 90.00 165.00 90.00 60.00 75.00 45.00 210.00 1,150.00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.^0 25.00 25.00 ZS.OO 25.00 25.00 300.00TOTAL190.00 190.00 101.80 130.00 432.80 259.95 467.25 115.00 125.95 395.42 1.083.36 235.00 3,716.53No. Plan Reviews 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 13No. Inspections 11 11 2 7 5 6 11 6 4 5 3 14 85 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 327.93 0.00 176.48 873.73 351.00 0.00 276.25 513.50 0.00 538.53 61.43 597.68 3,716.73 Inspections 165.00 0.00 90.00 240.00 165.00 150.00 165.00 210.00 120.00 45.00 60.00 210.00 1,620.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 300.00 TOTAL 517.93 25.00 291.48 1,138.93 541.00 175.00 466.25 748.50 145.00 608.53 146.43 832.68 5,636.73 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 3 3 0 4 1 0 3 1 1 18 No. Inspections 11 0 6 16 11 10 11 14 8 3 4 14 108 707.93 00 393.28 1,268.93 973.80 434.95 933.50 863.50 270.95 1,003.95 1,229.79 1,067.68 ■L36i.^6^ ^ C a/ '■•i' 'o £>> C5 DPT i iU CURRENTEMP »NAME GROSS GROSS471688060ANDERSON, BRUCE L 31 3693.60 1641.60474563339EOB2IEN, SUE A 31 2152.86 1071.20476921819BORIS, SCOTT W 31 2409.76 1204.88471840871EOSMA, JAMIE L 12 1182.73 580.46475443862ERINKHUS, JOHN F 42 3312.00 1656.00463843008CARLSON, MICHAEL B 31 581.83 319.80472503991CHESWrCK, GARY B 31 3549.12 1774.56469526026CORNICK, JAMES L 31 3795.26 1581.36475989721DEMBOUSKI, JAY C 31 3567.96 1667.64463821018ENGLISH III, IRVING 31 3804.16 1581.36472529007ERICKSON, KURT R 31 3223.04 1611.52463701868FISCHENICH, DAN T 31 3102.40 1551.20 469686562 GAFFRCN, MICHAEL P 33 3069.43 1555.52 468420832 GERHARDSON, JOHN R 42 4595.62 2415.31476020397GOMAN, ANITA D 35 186.45 67.52 469087884 GOMAN. DAVID J 35 465.11 240.87 474667812 GREGORY, JAMES D 42 2816.74 1282.97 475380151 HALLIN, DOROTHY M 12 2603.32 1304.16 477500666 HANSEN, STEVEN C 42 2460.46 1347.42 475444249 HAJJSING, CAROL J 31 1311.02 725.04 477463877 HASEMAN, CAROLE 12 2123.80 1081.25 471569863 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P 31 3424.48 1611.52 471848180 {ONOLLENBERG, KRISTIN 31 b22.56 340.13 472500574 KUEHTI, THOMAS M 15 4454.40 2227.20 121262417 MABUSTH, JEANNE A 33 3791.84 1395.93 430843542 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L 31 3391.04 1562.56 477561040 MELTON, NEIL W.31 168.32 168.32 470987727 MILLER, CHRISTOPHER 15 2227.45 1139.21 477700023 MOORSE, RONALD J 12 5098.88 2649.44 334506281 MCROWC2YNSKI, JAMES 31 3223 ^2 1611.52 463909535 CBERAIGNER, SCOTT G 42 .2779.33 1175.85 476783251 OBRIEN, RANDY L 92 2471.18 1358.15 476866274 OLSON, JOHN C.15 1902.40 964.08 470700901 OMAN, LYLE E 33 3069.44 1555.52 469848107 PALMER, GREGORY A 42 2299.32 1175.86 471487919 PERSELL, WILLIAiM R.31 533.79 359.07 474167795 PETERSON, JACK W 93 90.75 90.75 475382983 CUAST, WAYNE A 92 2807.86 1403.94 473746173 RATHBUN, BARRY J 92 2288.89 1175.85 470566529 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B 31 1518.52 120*i .30 469629194 SKREEN, DALE S 42 2256.69 1143.67 475569177 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 93 2644.16 1340.00 267460042 SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X 31 4354.56 2177.28 472563051 THOMTON, MARK R 31 3320 87 1581.36 474663296 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F 31 3162 . /2 1581.36 470704904 TCMCZYK, MARK W 31 3223.04 1611.52 475505292 VANG, BRUCE L 33 2644.15 1340.00 468629488 VEE, LINDA S 12 2113.77 1071.21 477881539 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J 33 2451.69 1242.48 63,022.72 • • % 1,266.63 HMP n NAME DPT YTD GROSS CURRENT*' GROSS 1 * , 38026 CALLAHAN, EDWARD J 11 300.00 300.00 /•24677 GOETTEN, J.DIANN 11 241.67 241.67 • . 66069 HURR, JOELLEN L 11 241.67 241.67 . • • 46272 JABBOUR, GABRIEL 11 241.67 241.67 — • • • 27186 KELLEY, '■ ILES 11 241.67 241.67 . • *• %f'v'tlCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jan 19 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995/01/23 1995 00:25:15VENDOR032303 032304 032305 032306 032307 032306 032309 032310 C32311 032312 032313 1995/01/231995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995 '01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 l‘»95/01/23 $1.$90,$175,$46, $100, $101, $96, $21, $30, $675, $60.00$60.00*076.10000.00000.00360.00 497.13 180.00 820.00 625.00 887.50 447.73* $1,497.00 $331.1-1 $250.00 $203.00 $250.00 $2,531.00* $60.00 $60.00* $39.50 $44.32 $83.82* $12.46 $46.31 $58.77* $342.40 $342.40* $121.20 $36.40 $110.33 $267.93* $5,441.00 $5,441.00* $221.69 $221.69* $505.84 $187.68 $693.52* AMEMAMERICANAMERICANAMERICANAMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN descriptionMEMBERSHIP DUESNATLNATLNATLNATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL BANKBANKBANKBANK BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK APPLE APPLE APPLE APPLE APPLE ATOM VALLEY VALLEY VALLEY VALLEY VALLEY AGENCY AGENCY AGENCY AGENCY AGENCY AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING CELLULAR ONE - MTKA CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE HRA TRUST DEBT DUE HRA DEBT DEBT DUE HRA DUBT DEBT DUE DEPT DUE DEBT DUE DEBT DUE FEE 6/14-1 2/1/95 due 1/15/95 2/1/95 DUE 1/15/95 2/1/95 2/1/95 2/1/95 2/1/95 1995 INSURNACE 1995 INSURANCE COMPUTER INSURANCE 1995 INSURANCE COMPUTER INSURANCE MEMBERSHIP IJES COFFEE KIT SANDWICHES COLOR COPIES COIN ENVELOPES CELL PHONE-VANG OIL CHANGE, SERVICE BATTERY TERMINAL #16 BATTERY #168 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H & TRANSF COLE PUBLICATIONS COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLE SUBSCRIPTION JAN INSURANCE JAN INSURANCE W/H Pag* 1ACCOUNT n PO NUM. MANUAL0175-4380 002267 ' S1 O1111111111i119350-2040 002284 CH0912-4610 002265 OH0911-4610 002284 OH0912-4620 002285 OH0911-4620 002284 v/il OH0909-4610 002266 OH0910-4610 002266 wn OH0909-4620 002266 OH0910-4620 002286 OH 0099-4375 002281 OH0099-4372 002280 OH0129-4373 002283 OH0099-4375 002282 OH0099-4373 002283 OH 0129-4380 002264 c:i 0591-4232 20284 OH0591-4802 12348 . OH 0358-4322 002273 OH0129-4322 47538 OH 0632-4560 37876 OH 0129-4341 5282E OH0129-4341 5274E ^^A A OH0129-4341 5317 %^A A OH 9999-2030 002297 OH 0129-4240 63212 OH 0129-4152 107950003225 OH9999-2030 107950003225 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jan 19 1995 00:25:15CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT H INVOICE PO NUM.Page 2 MANUAL 032314 032315 032316 032317 1995/01/231995/31/231995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 COMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRPLIFE/GRPLIFE/GRPLIFE/GRPLIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFELIFELIFELIFELIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE INS-INS-INSINSINS- INS INS INS INS INS JANJANJANJANJAN JAN JAN JAN •JAN •JAN $103.30 $103.30* $599.90 $292.05 $109.07 $1,001.02* $165.10 $165.10* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR #2 SOFTENER COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC TONER FOR COPIER DEVELOPER FOR COPIER COPIER LEASE-JAN CRABTREE COMPANIES INC TONER FOR FINANCE PR 0174-41520249-41520549-41520069-41520569-4152 0039-4152 0590-4152 9001-1290 9999-2030 0129-4152 0549-4345 0099-4210 0099-4210 0129-4340 0099-4210 002274002274002274002274002274 002274 002274 002274 002274 002274 3457 2056674 2056673 2053467 25257 OHOHOHOHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 032310 1995/01/23 $62.60 $62.60* CULLIGAN REPAIR PIPES k PIT W 0590-4342 10756 OK 032319 1995/01/23 $12.18 $12.18* DEMBOUSKI/JAY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEN 0129-4301 002292 OH 032320 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $2.61 $39.89 $7.85 $13.29 $63.64* DFPT OF /ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF /ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF /ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PROCESSIN MICROFICHE PROCESSIN MICROFICHE PROCESSIN MICROFICHE PROCESSIN 0174-4306 0039-4306 0039-4306 0174-4306 125511 125509 125511 125509 OH OH OH OH 032321 1995/01/23 $204.00 $204.00* DORADUS CORP SIREN MAINTENANCE 0175-4342 950129 OH 032322 1995/01/23 • $236.50 $236.50* EARL P ANDERSON ASSC STREET SIGNS 0249-4233 130733 OH 032323 1995/01/23 $5.00 $5.00* FEED RITE CONTROLS CONTAINER CH/VRGE 0549-4234 22723 OH 032324 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $9,168.75 $2,849.94 $12,018.69* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIRST NATION/O. BANK OF FIT, FICA, MEDCR W/H CITY SH/AIE FICA,MEDC 9999-2030 9999-2032 002298 002298 OH OH 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $39.27 $39.27 G K SERVICES G k K SERVICES FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS 0099-4343 0099-4343 443997 443998 OH OH « « • #COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jar 19 1995 00:25:15CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #Page ^PO NUM. MANUAL032225l»9b/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 $66.98$15.49$2.60$163.61*G ti K SERVICES G fc K SERVICES STREET EMPLOYEES RATHBUN, QUAST STEFFENHAGNE 0249-42210549-42210590-4221 440184440185440183 OHOHOH 032326 1995/01/23 $4.79 $4.79* GERRING'S CAR WASH CAR WASH #169 0129-4232 002288 OH 032327 1995/01/23 $1,356.50 $1,356.50*GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002295 OH 032328 1995/01/23 $360.25 $360.25* H 6 L MESAfil CUTTING EDGES FOR PL 0249-4232 27052 OH 032329 1995/01/23 $3.75 $3.75*HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CHIPS 0591-4802 100927 OH 032330 1995/01/23 $80.00 $80.00*HENNEPIN CNTY CHIEF PO MEMBERSHIP DUES 0129-4380 002265 OH 032331 1995/01/23 $146.50 $146.50*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR MARK THOMTON #C02667 9999-2030 002301 OH 032332 1995/01/23 $174.50 $174.50*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR DALE SKREEN #C026231 9999-2030 002300 OH 032333 1995/01/23 $200.00 $200.00* lACP MEMBERSHIP DUES 0129-4380 002263 OH 032334 1995/01/23 $8.33 $8.33* lAIMO MEMBERSHIP DUES-OMAN 0174-4380 03058 OK 032335 1995/01/23 $100.00 $100.00*ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002294 OH 032336 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $49.65 $12.99 $6.50 $69.14* KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS MILE.AGE JAN 1-15 mileage JAN 1-15 MILEAGE JAN 1-15 0069-4381 0174-4381 0569-4381 002260 002260 00^260 OH OH OH 032337 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $18.85 $8.68 $27.53* MABUSTH-JEANNE MABUSTH-JEANNE MILEAGE REIMB-JAN 1- SUPPLIES FOR XMAS PA 0174-4381 0099-4210 002287 002287 OH OH 032338 1995/01/23 $1,822.00 $1,822.00*MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #1 0020-4300 22752 OH 032339 1995/01/23 '2,313.00 $2,313.00*MAMA-LMC LABOR RCL SER SUBSCRIBER RENEWAL 0039-4380 002276 OH •‘i COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jan 19 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 00:25:15VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # INVOICE PO NUM.Page 4 MANUAL032340 032341 032342 032343 032344 032345 032346 032347 032348 032349 032350 032351 032352 032353 032354 1995/01/231995/01/231995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $1,716.22$170.74$301.00$1,154.02$602.00$3,943.98* $75.00 $75.00* $24,629.00 $24,629.00* $127.80 $127.80* $36.22 $36.22* $2,718.33 $2,718.33* $10.18 $74 22 $84.40* $50.00 $50.00* $200.00 $200.00* $75.00 $75.00* $400.00 $400.00* $100.00 $100.00* $10.00 $10.00* $25.00 $25.00* $15.08 $15.08* MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MEMA TREASURER METRO WASTE MILLER ENTERPRISES MINN COMM INSURANCE-JAN INSURANCE-JAN INSURANCE-JAf; INSURANCE W/H-JAN INSURANCE-JAN MEMBERSHIP DUES SEWER SERVICE-PEB SNOWPLOW MOTOR #428 PAGERS MINNESOTA DEPT OP REVB STATE TAX W/H MN BENEFIT ASSN MN BENEFIT ASSN MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO INSURANCE W/H-JAN INSURANCE-JAN MEMBERSHIP DUES-OMAN MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP-SU MN DARE OFFICERS ASSOC SEMINAR-CORNICK MN POLLUTION CONTROL A SEMINAR-HANSEN,OBERA MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP W/H MUNICI-PALS NACA OMAN/LYLE MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBER DUES RENEWAL MILEAGE REIM-JAN 0129-41510174-41510590-41519999-20300249-4151 0175-4380 9673-1282 0249-4232 0249-4320 9999-2030 9999-2030 0129-4152 0174-4380 0129-4380 0129-4356 0569-4356 9999-2030 0039-4380 0185-4380 0174-4381 002290002290002290002290002290 002266 51480295 17621 70660001952 002297 002291 002291 002272 002262 002270 002279 002299 002269 002293 002289 OHOHOHOHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH m.COUNCIL CHECK REGIFTER Thu Jan 19 CHECK NO CHECiC LATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 00:25:15VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT #INVOICE PO NUM.Page 5 MANUAL0323551995/01/23 $149.00$149.00*OMNITRAK LEARNING SYST WORDPERFECT SEMINAR-0129-4356 0110 OH0323561995/01/23 $14. X • $14 13*PEBSCO/OERA UEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002302 OH 032357 1995/01/23 $1,323.4G $1,323.46* PEBSCO/US CONE OP MAYO DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002303 OH 032358 1995/01/23 1995/0J/23 $3,530.65 $4,624.16 $0,154.81* PERA PBRA PERA W/H PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2030 9999-2031 002296 002296 OH OH 032359 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/0J/23 $24.57 $203.81 $38.02 $29.12 $296.32* PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER BIOS FOR WTR TANK BUDGET SUMMARY-1995 OCB RD TRAIL IMPROV LAND USE APPLICATION 0549-4323 0069-4324 0359-4323 0174-4324 1208 1204 1214 247 OH OH OH OH 032360 1995/01/23 $24.00 $24.00* POSTMASTER PO BOX RENTAL-POLICE 0129-4321 002261 OH 032361 1995/01/23 $11.57 $11.57* PRO TIRE & EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #171 0129-4341 4775 OH 0323C2 1995/01/23 $240.00 $240.00* PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP CO CALIBRATE RADAl*'0129-4342 6235 OH 032363 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $137.20 $31 .40 $168.60* REED VENDING REED VENDING CANDY CANDY 0591-4802 0591-4802 48020 48023 OH OH 032364 1995/01/23 $20.70 $20.78* RICKS SUPERVALU MISC SUPPLIES 0590-4232 002278 Oh 032365 1995/01/23 $6,210.37 $6,210.37* ROLF E ERICKSON FEBRUARY SERVICES 0059-4307 002271 OH 032366 1995/01/23 $333.24 $333.24* ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT LOADER OIL 0249-4J20 126470 OH 032367 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $21.25 $10.76 $32 01* STREICHERS STREICHERS ASP HOLDER FINGERPRINT EQUIP 0129-4221 0129-4232 13495.1 13494.1 OH OH 032368 1995/01/23 ’2.7b ^^j72.78* STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX SERVICE CONTRACT 0129-4340 221479 OH 032369 1995/01/23 $7.65 $7.65* THOMTON, MARK REIMBURSE FOR NAMEVL 0129-4232 002268 OK COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Jan 19 1995 00:25:15CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT H INVOI0323701995/01/23 $79.91$79.91*TOLL CO WELDING RODS 0249-4232 3016930323711995/01/23 $30.00$30.00*UNITED WAY CHARITY DONATIONS W/9999-2030 002-5040323721995/01/23 $282.22$282.22*WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002277 032373 1995/01/23 $2,650.00 $2,650.00* WAYZATA-CITY OP 1995 FIRE PROTECTION 0133-4318 002275 Page €PO NUM. MANUALOHOHOH OH $759,208.20 • • •# •• •• rCOUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY Thu Jan 19 1995 00:25:20FUNDN001GENERAL FUND $24,419.88FUNDn114IMP/EQUIP O/L FD $342.40FUNDn34692 IMP BD D/S FD $136,360.00FUNDn35091 PUB FAC D/S $276,575.23 FUND n 423 MUN ST AID CO/FD $51.28 FUND «6/2 WTR OPERATING FD $133,035.43 FUND 673 SHR OPERATING FD $154,745.58 FUND 674 G/C OPERATING FD $644.00 FUND »999 PAYROLL CLEARING $33,034.40 $759,208.20 &Page 1 ; tv, COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995/01/23 . . . . . . . . ..1995 00:21:51VENDOR032303$60.00$60.00* 032304 1995/01/23 $1, 1995/01/23 $90, 1995/01/23 $175, 1995/01/23 $46, 1995/01/23 $100, 1995/01/23 $101, 1995/01/23 $90, 1995/01/23 $31, 1995/01/23 $30, $675, 070.10 000.00 000 360 497 100 00 00 13 00 020.00 625.00 007.50 447.73* AMEM AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN AMERICAN DESCRIPTION MEMBERSHIP DUES ACCOUNT # 0175-4300 INVOICE002267 PO NUM NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL NATL BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK HRA TRUST FEE 6/14-1 9350-2040 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0912-4610 HRA DEBT DUE 1/15/95 0911-4610 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0912-4620 HRA DUBT DUE 1/15/95 0911-4620 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0909-4610 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0910-4610 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0909-4620 DEBT DUE 2/1/95 0910-4620 002204 002205 002204 002205 002204 002206 002206 002206 OOiS206 Page 1 MANUAL OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 032305 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $1,497.00 $331.00 $250.00 $203.00 $250.00 $2,531.00* APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY 1995 INSURNACE 1995 INSURANCE COMPUTER INSURANCE 1995 INSURANCE COMPUTER INSURANCE 0099-4375 0099-4372 0129-4373 0099-4375 0099-4373 002281 002200 002283 002282 002283 OH OH OH OH OH 032306 1995/01/23 $60.00 $60.00* ATOM MEMBERSHIP DUES 0129-4380 002264 OH 032307 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $39.50 $44.32 $83.02* AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF COFFEE KIT SANDWICHES 0591-4232 0591-4802 20284 12340 OH OH 032308 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $12.46 $46.31 $58.77* BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING COLOR COPIES COIN ENVELOPES 0358-4322 0129-4322 002273 47538 OH OH 032309 1995/01/23 $342.40 $342.40* CELLULAR ONE - MTKA CELL PHONE-VANG 0632-4560 37876 OH 032310 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $121.20 $36.40 $110.33 $267.93* CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE CHUNKS GARAGE OIL CHANGE, SERVICE BATTERY TERMINAL #16 BATTERY #168 0129-4341 0129-4341 0129-4341 5202E 5274E 5317 OH OH OH 032311 1995/01/23 $5,441.00 $5,441.00* CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H & TRANSF 9999-2030 002297 OH 032312 1995/01/23 $221.69 $221.69* COLE PUBLICATIONS COLE SUBSCRIPTION 0129-4240 63212 OH 032313 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $505.84 $187.68 $693.52* COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO JAN INSURANCE JAN INSURANCE W/H 0129-4152 9999-2030 107950003225 107950003225 OH OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51 Page 2HECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT M INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL1995/01/23 $12.75 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0174-4152 002274 OH1995/01/23 $21.67 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0249-4152 002274 OH1995/01/23 $2.07 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0549-4152 002274 OH1995/01/23 $2.55 COMMERCIAL LIFB/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0069-4152 002274 OH 1995/01/23 $2.58 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0569-4152 002274 OH 1995/01/23 $21.75 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0039-4152 002274 OH 1995/01/23 $.85 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0590-4152 002274 OH 1995/01/23 $2.20 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 9001-1298 002274 OH 1995/01/23 $104.60 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 9999-2030 002274 OH 032314 1995/01/23 $75.93 $246.95* COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE INS-JAN 0129-4152 002274 OH 032315 1995/01/23 $183.30 $183.30* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR #2 SOFTENER 0549-4345 3457 OH 1995/01/23 $599.90 COPY DUP PR INC TONER FOR COPIER 0099-4210 2056674 OH 1995/01/23 $292.05 COPY DUP PR INC DEVELOPER FOR COPIER 0099-4210 2056673 OH 032316 1995/01/23 $189.87 $1,081.82* COPY DUP PR INC COPIER LEASE-JAN 0129-4340 2053467 OH 032317 1995/01/23 $165.10 $165.10* CRABTREE COMPANIES INC TONER FOR FINANCE PR 0099-4210 25257 OH 032318 1995/01/23 $62.60 $62.60* CULLIGAN REPAIR PIPES fit FIT W 0590-4342 18756 OH 032319 1995/01/23 $12.18 $12.18* DEMBOUSKI/JAY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEN 0129-4381 002292 OH 1995/01/23 $2.61 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PROCESSIN 0174-4306 125511 OH 1995/01/23 $39.89 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PROCESSIN 0039-4306 125509 OH 1995/01/23 $7.85 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PROCESSIN 0039-4306 125511 OH 032320 1995/01/23 $13.29 $63.64* DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION MICROFICHE PROCESSIN 0174-4306 125509 OH 032321 1995/01/23 $204.00 $204.00* DORADUS CORP SIREN MAINTENANCE 0175-4342 950129 OH 032322 1995/01/23 $236.50 $236.50* EARL F ANDERSON ASSC STREET SIGNS 0249-4233 138733 OH 032323 1995/01/23 $5.00 $5.00* FEED RITE CONTROLS CONTAINER CHARGE 0549-4234 22723 OH 1995/01/23 $9,168.75 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FIT, FICA, MEDCR W/H 9999-2030 002298 OH 032324 1995/01/23 $2,849.94 $12,018.69* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA,MEDC 9999-2032 002298 OH 1995/01/23 $39.27 G & K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0099-4343 443997 OH 1995/01/23 $39.27 G fit K SERVICES FLOOR MATS 0099-4343 443998 OH r » .'rCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1995 00:21:51 VENDOR032325032326 032327 032328 022329 1995/01/231995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $66.98$15.49$2.60$163.61*$4.79$4.79* $1,356.50 $1,356.50* $360.25 $36 ..25* $3.75 $3.75* description account « INVOICEG i K SERVICES G fc K SERVICES G i K SERVICES PO NUM.STREET EMPLOYEES RATHBUN, OUAST STEFFENHAGNEGERRING'S CAR WASH CAR WASH #169 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DEF COMP W/H H S. L MESABI CUTTING EDGES FOR PL HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CHIPS 0249-42210549-42210590-42210129-4232 9999-2030 0249-4232 0591-4802 440184440185440183002288 002295 27052 100927 Page 3MANUALOHOHOH OH OH OH OH 032330 1995/01/23 $80.00 $80.00*HENNEPIN CNTY CHIEF PO MEMBERSHIP DUES 0129-4380 0022 5 OH 032331 1995/01/23 $146.50 $146.50*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR MARK THOMTON #C02667 9999-2030 002301 OH 032332 1995/01/23 $174.50 $174.50*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPCR DALE SKREEN #C026231 9999-2030 002300 OH 032333 1995/01/23 $200.00 $200.00* lACP MEMBERSHIP DUES 0129-4380 002263 OH 032334 1995/01/23 $8.33 $8.33* lAPMO MEMBERSHIP DUES-OMAN 0174-4380 03058 OH 032335 1995/01/23 $100.00 $100.00*ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002294 OH 032336 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $49.65 $12.99 $6.50 $69.14* KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE JAN 1-15 MILEAGE JAN 1-15 MILEAGE JAN 1-15 0069-4381 0174-4381 0569-4381 002260 002260 002260 OH OH OH 032337 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $18.85 $8.68 $27.53* MABUSTH-JEANNE MABUSTH-JEANNE MILEAGE REIMB-JAN 1- SUPPLIES FOR XMAS PA 0174-4381 0099-4210 002287 002287 OH OH 032338 1995/01/23 $1,822.00 $1,822.00*MALLOY KARNOW3KI CO AUDIT PAYMENT #1 0020-4300 22752 OH 032339 1995/01/23 $2,313.00 $2,313.00*MAMA-LMC LABOR REL SER SUBSCRIBER RENEWAL 0039-4380 002276 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT i995 00:21:51VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT It INVOICE PO NUM.Page 4 MANUAL 032340 032341 032342 032343 032344 032345 032346 032347 032348 032349 032350 032351 032352 032353 032354 1995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $1,716.22$170.74$301.00 $1,154.02 $602.00 $3,943.90* $75.00 $75.00* $24,629.00 $24,629.00* $127.80 $127.80* $36.22 $36.22* $2,718.33 $2,718.33* $10.18 $74.22 $84 .40* $50.00 $50.00* $200.00 $200.00* $75.00 $75.00* $400.00 $400.00* $100.00 $100.00* $10.00 $10.00* $25.00 $25.00* $15.08 $15,08* MED CTR HEALTH CARF MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MEMA TREASURER METRO WASTE MILLER ENTERPRISES MINN COMM INSURANCE-JAN INSURANCE-JAN INSURANCE-JAN INSURANCE K/H-JAN INSURANCE-JAN MEMBERSHIP DUES SEWER SERVICE-FEB SNOWPLOW MOTOR H428 PAGERS MINNESOTA DEPT OP REVE STATE TAX W/H MN BENEFIT ASSN MN BENEFIT ASSN MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO INSURANCE W/H-JAN INSURANCE-JAN MEMBERSHIP DUES-OMAN MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP-SU MN DARE OFFICERS ASSOC SEMINAR-CORNICK MN POLLUTION CONTROL A SEMTNAR-HANSEN,OBERA MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE DEF COMP W/H MUNICI-PALS NACA OMAN/LYLE MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBER DUES RENEWAL MILEAGE REIM-JAN 0129-41510174-41510590-4151 9999-2030 0249-4151 0175-4380 9673-1282 0249-4232 0249-4320 9999-2030 9999-2030 0129-4152 0174-4380 0129-4380 0129-4356 0569-4356 9999-2030 0039-4380 0185-4380 0174-4381 002290002290002290 002290 002290 002266 51480295 17621 70660001952 002297 002291 002291 002272 002262 002270 002279 002299 002269 002293 002289 OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH •^ m imCOUNCILCHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51 •Page 5CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT tt032355$149.00*OMNITR.'iK LEARNING SYST WORDPERFECT SEMINAR-0129-4356 0110 OH 032356 1995/01/23 $14.13 $14.13* PEBSCO/OBRA DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002302 032357 1995/01/23 $1,323.46 $1,323.46* PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYO DBF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002303 OH 032356 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $3,530.65 $4,624.16 $8,154.81* PERA PERA PERA W/H PERA CITY SHARE 9999-2030 9999-2031 002296 002296 OH OH 032359 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $24.57 $203.81 $38.82 $29.12 $296.32* PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER BIDS FOR WTR TANK BUDGET SUMMARY-1995 OCB RD TRAIL IMPROV LAND USE APPLICATION 0549-4323 0069-4324 0359-4323 0174-4324 1208 1204 1214 247 OH OH OH OH 032360 1995/01/23 $24.00 $24.00* POSTMASTER PO BOX RENTAL-POLICE 0129-4321 002261 OH 032361 1995/01/23 $11.57 $11.57* PRO TIRE b EXHAUST OIL CHANGE #171 0129-4341 4775 OH 032362 1995/01/23 $240.00 $240.00* PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP CO CALIBRATE RADAR 0129-4342 6235 OH 032363 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $137.20 $31.40 $168.60* REED VENDING REED VENDING CANDY CANDY 0591-4802 0591-4802 48020 48023 OH OH 032364 1995/01/23 $20.78 $20.78* RICKS SUPERVALU MISC SUPPLIES 0590-4232 002278 OH 032365 1995/01/23 $6,210.37 $6,210.37* ROLF E ERICKSON FEBRUARY SERVICES 0059-4307 002271 OH 032366 1995/01/23 $333.24 $333.24* ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT LOADER OIL 0249-4220 126470 OH 032367 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $21.25 $10.76 $32.01* STREICHERS STREICHERS ASP HOLDER FINGERPRINT EQUIP 0129-4221 0129-4232 13495.1 13494.1 OH OH 032368 1995/01/23 $372.78 $372.78* STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX SERVICE CONTRACT 0129-4340 221479 OH 032369 1995/01/23 $7.65 $7.65* THOMTON, MARK REIMBURSE FOR NAMEPL 0129-4232 002268 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N INVOICE0323701995/01/23 $79.91$79.91*TOLL CO WELDING RODS 0249-4232 3016930323711995/01/23 $30.00$30.00*UNITED WAY CHARITY DONATIONS W/9999-2030 002304 032372 1995/01/23 $282.22 $282.22* WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4232 002277 032373 1995/01/23 $2,650.00 $2,650.00* WAYZATA-CITY OF 1995 FIRE PROTECTION 0133-4318 002275 032377 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $22.20 $22.20 $22.20 $22.20 $22.20 $111.00* AT & AT L AT U AT k AT k T INFO SYSTEM T INFO SYSTEM T INFO SYSTEM T INFO SYSTEM T INFO SYSTEM DATA LINE DATA LINE DATA LINE DATA LINE DATA LINE 0059-4340 0174-4340 0249-4340 0129-4340 0069-4340 5217905926 5217905926 5217905926 5217905926 5217905926 032370 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $2.58 $2.56 $2.58 $2.58 $2.58 $19.89 $32.77* AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM LONG DISTANCE LONG DISTANCE LONG DISTANCE LONG DISTANCE LONG DISTANCE LONG DISTANCE 0174-4320 0249-4320 0059-4320 0069-4320 0129-4320 0129-4320 002317 002317 002317 002317 002317 002318 PO NUM.Page 6 MANUAL 032379 032380 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $5,207.40 $5,207.40* BARTON SAND/GRAVEL WINTER SAND 0249-4233 $294.92 BEST BUY COMPANY HP DESKJET 540 0129-4560 $294.92* $83.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN NOV SERVICE 0549-4305 $100.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN NOV SERVICE 0200-4304 $148.75 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN LEAD, COPPER S'^UDY 0549-4305 $829.48 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN L.S. #7 REHAB-OCT INSP/SURVEY/EASMNTS- 9673-1600 $15,592.65 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN 0360-4305 $127.90 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN CONS ENG RFP #1 0360-4305 $375.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD TRAIL(NON MSA 0200-4305 $3,044.68 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSPECTIONS-OCT 0361-4305 $9,309.70 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN INSPECTIONS-OCT 0355-4305 $7,856.98 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN STUBBS BAY SWR CLOSE 0408-4305 $6,957.92 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN insp/survey/easmnts-0360-4305 $1,586.30 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN CONS ENG RFP #2 0360-4305 $249.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN OCB RD trail(NON-MSA 0200-4305 $249.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN KELLY AVE STORM SWR 0419-4305 $5,184.94 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN survey/INSP-NOV 0361-4305 $1,816.36 BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ENG APPLIC NOV 0840-4305 002306 0040118469 032231 032231 31663 31662 31661 31660 31659 31658 31657 31656 32238 32237 32236 032231 32235 032231 OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH • ^ rCOUNCILCHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51 Page 7CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT n INVOICE PO MUM.MANUAL 032382 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $256.54 $3,599.00 $176.00 $2,856.40 $297.50 $189.00 $694.00 $283.50 $100.00 $36.50 $339.30 $62,339.48* BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE ASM ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ASN ENG RF #1 NOV INSPECTIONS-NOV M.SA GENERAL-NOV ENG APPLIC OCT BASE MAP UPDATE OCT WTR PLANNING REGULAT KELLY AVE STORM SWR ICE ARENA/ORONO HOCK OCT SERVICE COST OF TANK #3 WELL OCT SERVICE 0361-4305 0355-4305 0200-4305 0040-4305 0200-4305 0549-4305 0419-4305 0200-4305 0200-4304 0549-4305 0200-4305 32234 32233 32232 031655 031655 031655 031655 031655 031655 031655 031655 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 032383 1995/01/23 $347.80 $347.88* BORIS,SCOTT UNIFORM-BORIS 0129-4221 002307 OH 032384 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $164.66 $43 .42 $208.00* BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING SUMP PUMP CONNECTION SNOWBIRD VIOLATIONS 0569-4322 0249-4322 46875 47312 OH OH 032385 1995/01/23 $20.00 $20.00* CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS PROBABLE CAUSE/BAIL 0080-4359 002309 OH 032386 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $434.06 $2,663.24 $3,097.30* COMMISSIONER TRANS COMMISSIONER TRANS TESTING & INSPECTION TESTING & INSPECTION 0360-4305 0360-4305 127105 126486 OH OH 032387 1995/01/23 $430.25 $438.25* CYS UNIFORMS UNIFORM-CORNICK 0129-4221 002305 OH 032388 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $311.20 $700.15 $1,011.35* DAHLGREN SHARDLOW DAHLGREN SHARDLOW CRYSTAL BAY PARK PLA CRYSTAL BAY PARK PLA 0400-4306 0400-4306 16103 16203 OH OH 032389 1995/01/23 $335.00 $335.00* DAVID MCNICHOLS TUITION REIMB-MCNICH 0129-4356 002321 OH 032390 1995/01/23 $383.84 $303.84* EARL F ANDERSON ASSC 2-WAY BRACKETS 0249-4232 138688 OH 032391 1995/01/23 $195.80 $195.80* ENGLISH IRVING TUITION REIMB-ENGLIS 0129-4356 002322 OH 032392 1995/01/23 $29.78 $29.78* HAMEL BUILDING CENTER LATHE FOR PLOW 0249-4232 A32686 OH 032393 1995/01/23 $42.50 $42.50* HUMANE SOC OF WRIGHT C 4TH QTR IMPOUND FEES 0105-4360 002310 OH 1995/01/23 $56.18 JET QUICK COLOR COPIES 0174-4322 81902 OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM.Page 8 MANUAL032394$56 032395 032396 032397 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $602 $250 $18 $462 $198 $820 $120 $1,264 $120 $588 $17 $7 $28 $602 $250 $18 $17 $020 $120 $600 $1,264 $7 $20 $600 $602 $254 $10 $462 $190 $020 $17 $600 $7 $1,264 $20 $13,700 00 .72 .70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .66 .00 .20 .31 .00 .72 .70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 .31 .00 .00 .47 .70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 .00 .31 .44* $2,376.00 $2,376.00* $94.75 $37.27 $37.27 $37.27 $206.56* LOG IS LOG IS LOGIS LOG IS ..OGIS LOGIS LOG IS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE iUITE sn'i?. su:Tt SUI'l' SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE OCT SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE PAYROLL CHECKS OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE NOV SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE DEC SERVICE OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE PEC SERVICE UEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE DEC SERVICE METRO WASTE CONTROL CO DEC SAC CHARGES 0129- 0069- 0039- 0569- 0549- 0174- 0039- 0069- 0039- 0069- 0569- 0549- 0174- 0129- 0069- 0039- 0569- 0569- 0549- 0174- 0039- 0129- 0069- 0549- 0174- 0129- 0129- 0069- 0039- 0569 0549 0174 0569 0129 0549 0069 0174 4355 4355 4355 4352 4352 4352 4352 4352 4352 4322 •4355 •4355 •4355 •4355 •4355 -4355 -4355 -4352 -4352 -4352 -4352 -4352 -4352 -4355 -4355 -4352 -4355 -4355 -4355 -4352 -4352 -4352 -4355 -4352 -4355 -4352 -4355 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MIDWEST BSNS PROD MIDWEST BSNS PROD MIDWEST BSNS PROD MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES 9001-2226 0129-4210 0039-4210 0174-4210 0069-4210 AR1194 AR1194 AR1194 AR1194 AR1194 AR1194 AR1094 AR1194 AR1194 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1194 AR1094 AR1094 AR1094 AR1294 AR1094 AR1094 AR1194 AR1194 AR1194 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 AR1294 002314 992647 992647 992647 992647 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OK OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00:21:51VEirooR Page 9DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT »INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0129-4232 112940869 OH0249-4233 12940868 OH 0039-4300 002323 OH 0174-4380 002323 OH 9001-2222 002315 OH 0129-4210 002312 OH0290-4232 002312 OH0249-4232 002312 OH0129-4232 002312 CH0590-4232 002312 OH 0590-4324 002320 OH0290-4324 002320 OH0569-4324 002320 OH0249-4324 002320 OH 0175-43''4 002320 OH 0129-4232 002311 OH 0174-4301 002316 OH 0080-4303 414258.0 OH0000-4303 414258.0 OH0080-4303 414258.0 OH0080-4303 411293-0 OH0000-4301 414258.0 OH0080-4301 411293-0 OK0080-4303 414258.0 OH0080-4303 411293-0 OH 0631-4540 049740 OH0631-4540 106336 OH0631-4540 049739 OH0631-4540 049450 OH 0129-4341 4390 OH0129-4341 4380 OH 032398 032399 032400 032401 032402 032403 032404 032405 032406 032407 1995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 $13.50$31.50$45.00* $37.50 $75.00 $112.50* $2,129.37 $2,129.37* MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM MEDICAL OXYGEN MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM MEDICAL OXYGEN MN PLANNING ASSOC. MN PLANNING ASSOC. MN STATE TREASURER DUES-MOORSE DUES-MABUSTH, GAFFRO PERMIT SURCHARGE-DEC $44.67 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES$6.48 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES$14.38 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES$63.13 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES$18.18 $146.84* NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC SUPPLIES $24.40 NSP NSP COSTS$7.46 NSP NSP COSTS$633.77 NSP NSP COSTS$120.39 NSP NSP COSTS $3.14 $789.16* NSP NSP COSTS $59.85 O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE AU CAR WASH TICKETS$59.85* $23.52 $23.52* OMAN/LYLE $597.60 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC$309.25 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC $3,089.40 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC $231.88 POPHAM HAIK &ASSOC $1,100.00 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $1,261.66 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $408.50 POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC $3,571.00 $10,569.29* POPHAM HAIK fit ASSOC MILEAGE REIMB-DEC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE WASH SCI TITLE REG MPRS LAWSUIT-NOV WASH SCI TITLE REG NOV SERVICE OCT SERVICE NOV SERVICE MPRS LAWSUIT-OCT $575.10 $127.05 $53.25 $4,036.38 $4,791.78* $124.86 $24.00 $148.86* PRECISION BUSINESS SYS DICTATOR PRECISION BUSINESS SYS ON/OFF SWITCH PRECISION BUSINESS SYS BULK ERASER PRECISION BUSINESS SYS RECORDING EQUIPMENT PRO TIRE Si exhaust PRO TIRE Si exhaust OIL CHANGE #167 SERVICE #171 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Jan 20 1995 00:21:51CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION032408OJ2409032410 032411 032412 032413 1995/01/231995/01/231995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 1995/01/23 I$72.71' $72.78^$75.00$75.00*150.00150.00* $215.66 $25.03 $39.97 $9.95 $4.74 $77.00 $373.15* $26.63 $17.75 $45.94 $44.38 $55.60 $44.37 $44.37 $279.04* $99.05 $99.05* $869,507.92 RITZ CAMERA SPECTRA FILMSPRING PARK CAR WA^r: CAR WASH TICKETSULIRAMAX UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UlU FORMS UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNLIMITED UNLIMITED UNLIMITED UNLIMITED UNLIMITED US US US US US US US WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST COMMUN COMMON COMMUU COMMUN COMMUN COMMUN COMMUN WARNING LITES OF MN AMMO BADGES fit SHIRT-CORPO BELT FOR JOHNSON NAME TAGS CAP FOR DEMBOUSKI SILVER BLACK CLUTCH SHIRTS FOR POLICE US US US US US US US WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS BARRICADE RENTAL ACCOUNT ff INVOICE Page 10 PO NUM. MANUAL0129-4210 3764050 OH0129-4232 00P308 OH0129-4241 0023.3 OH 0129-4221 100556 OH 0129-4221 473750 OH 0129-4221 473333 OH 0129-4221 474191 OH 0129-4221 475745 OH 0129-4221 59105 OH 0569-4355 002319 OH 0549-4355 002319 OH 0549-4320 002319 OH 0174-4355 002319 OH 0549-4320 002319 OH 0129-4355 002319 OH 0069-4355 002319 OH 0249-4331 67914 OH ■/*I* FUND # FUND # FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft FUND ft CHECK SUMMARY Fri Jan 20 1995 00;21:5J001GENERAL FUND $67,113.06114IMP/EQUIP 0/L FD $5,134.1834692 IMP BD D/S FD $136,360.0035091 PUB FAC D/S $276,575.23423MUN ST AID CO/FD $48,808.21424PERM IMP REV FD $1,954.3542692 STUBBS SWR FD $7,856.98 672 WTR OPERATING FD $134,227.81 673 SWR OPERATING FD $157,837.12 674 G/C OPERATING FD $686.58 999 PAYROLL CLEARING $33,034.40 $869,587.92 Page 1