Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-17-1995 Planning Packetr ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 17,1995 ROLL The Orono Planmng Commisston met on the above date with the following men4)ers fvesent: Chair Charles Schroeder, Stephen Peto^son, Sandra SmitK Dale Lindquist, CffiKbce Rowlette, Charles Nolan, Jr, and Janice Berg Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Midnisth and Recx>rder Sherry Frost represettied Staff Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p m. STHEDDLED PtBUC HEARING/PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING (#1) 7^10 P.M. #1990 ROBERT W. CARLSON, 710 GANDER ROAD - VACATION OF EASEMENT - S:05-S:08 P.M. Mr. Carlson was not present. No member of the public had any conunents. Schroeder moved. Lindquist seconded, to table Item #1990. Ayes 7, Nays 0. ACTION ITEMS (#2) #1975 LARRY ANHALT, 2190 WAYZATA BLVD. - APPEALS CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00-S;05 P.M. The Applicant was present Mabusth said this application has been taken in as an appeal because of the many land use issues that must be resolved before a formal application can be filed. The plan calls for a commercial use of Outlot E, Sugar Woods, in BI zoning district. The Manning Commission is asked lo determine if the proposed use is consent with intent of B-1 code for a "garage” use. There b also the issue of a partially platted east/west road to the north of the property, and City's plan to seek a fintd access to east at North Brown Road. The conceptual site plan conssts of a showroom, an office area, garage, and car wash. One third of the structure will be for office and showroom use with the remainder for the garage and car wash. The applicant advised the showroom will house such items as tires, exhaust systems, and brake systems. One major issue im olves a conflict with plat nups presented with information. The right- of-way issue needs to be solved. Staff provided an ^::diibit depicting the various options .foi ^ig«^-or>way dedications. The City Engineer and Mn/DOT say that a C/D line is beii^ in the I9f'5 improvements. The plat map for the County shows the right-of-way as an E/F line. According lo Dennis Hill of the County’s Property Description Office, we should go with the right ot-way we depicted by the C/D line in lieu of that shown on the current Count> p!dt map. Hwy 12 at this location will have a median in the center probablv mm to left or east. The median is part of the 1995 safety improvements. i ■i r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#2 - #1975 Larry Anhalt - Conlimied) The northern 55* of the property trust rezoied frnn RR-IB to B-1 coiststettt with directives of Sugar Woods plat. The commissHW discusxd the need to plat the tenwnder of the oist/west road wlridi they Mlvised drauM be pfattted as part of tl^ application The ro«l will run from the Often property at the west and through Anhalt's property, eventually to Brown Road The road will he inataHed based on demands for future devdopment. The Sugar Woods covenants say that at the time the common corridor is to be platted that the road will be designated It was noted that because applicant has been asked to dedicate additional right-of-way for 1995 Hwy 12 inifN’ovements, MtiTXJT has approved a single curb cut to property The land owner. Sid Rebers, along with hb legal representative, Greg Poe, were preseiit. Rebers originally owned 41 acres from Sugu Woo^ to Hwy 12. Poe discussed why it was his opinion that the east/west. Brown to Willow Road, connection is not functional Cliff Otten was also present The easement goes through the Often property into the Reber property It was important to note that easemems now exist from Willow Road over Outlot D within applicant's property and does not extoid any furtiKr into Outlot F. Thb would have to be asked for as part of the application process. Outlot D unu created as (ml of the future ro»I. Any devefopment of the property ei»t of the Wear property would trigger construction of the road The first issue to be resolved would be in the proposed us>^ permitted under the B-l code. Anhalt's business. Pro Tire and Exhaust, is a retail/installation operation mvolving what he called quick items, tires, shocks, struts, exhaust, aligmnents, and oil changes. The plan is for a garage consistirig of four, east fruring bays and a car wash for hb clientele, not for the general puUic. The location would provide good exposure bdi% located on Hwy 12. It should be noted that the site allows adequate room to move the proposed building to the rear as Mn/DOT b taking additional land for rq^-of-way. Anhalt is asking for clarification from the Planning Commission on the zonii^ issue in order to proceed with site planiiifq$ Mabusth reviewed the intent of the BI sales district that encourages commodities or services for the surrounding neighborhood and may adjoin a residentbl area. It must be serviced by municipal water and sewer, and direct highway access is needed. The garage use b listed under the conditional use section of the code and includes repair of cars, which rmist be totally enclosed. The rear and front setback requirements present no problem. There are recent Mn/DOT changes to Hwy 12 that the City and Applicam will need to review for thb application. r MINLITES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANLFARY 17, I<»5 (#2 - #1975 Larrv Anhah - Cofttimied) The Pfauinii^ Commis^men vmced their approvid of tMs land use sayii^ it was consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Nolan hrougitt up the number of parkii^ sta'Js needed for this us^ M^iuAh said this woi^ be studied as pait of tlK conditional use permic proce» Neighbor, Bill Wear, of 2160 Wayzata Blvd , said he was concerned with the curb cut He feeb A is too close to his property aiKl should be relocated Otherwise, he finds the applicMion to be satisfiK:tory ClifT Often, the property owner to the immediaie west noted his support and approval of the application. Peterson moved. Smith seconded, to approve Apfdication #1975, with the findii^ that the applicant complies with the B1 zoning code and amendment two of the Comprehensive nan. The applicant oust come b«;k before the cenurassion with a formal conditional use permit and commercial site plan, rezoning and subdivision application. The comnnssion reafiirmed for applicant that the City will expect the designation of a fiiture connection road to North Brown Road at the lime of the platting of Outlot F Ayes 7, Nays 0. #l9tl TODD R. COliRNEYA, 4620 TONKA VIEW LANE - VARUNCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -1:00-0:20 P.M. The Applicant was present Mabusth said the Applicant has come back with a new plan which does not encroach the btulT area The proposed house has been downsized, and the gan^ has been relocated to the west side and reduced to two stalls. The proposed house %vill be located 25’ from the street lot line where 35' is required. The setback from the existing traveled road wifi be 46' and at 42' if Tortkaview Road is upgraded at 28' width, as proposed by the City Engineer. The setback from the l(/ grassed boulevard of the upgraded road is 32' fttm the north side, where 35' is required. Peterson, who was one of three commissioners who reviewed this application at the laat meeting, recalled that if a variance was to be needed, preference was to the street aide and not to the bhifT area side. A main concern was with the drainage for the proposed plan. Rowlettte was concerned that no water goes down the hill on the she. Nohui said a landscape stabilizatkH) plan would be needed along with a drainage plan designed by a prcdessional engineer. Smith is concerned with the patio and the placement of the building over the smaller hill. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HEl D ON JANUARY 17, 1995 (#3 - #I9S1 Todd R Couitieva - Continued)! Nolan movecL Rowlene sax^idai, to if^irove Applkatitni #1981 subject to review and accefMttioe h>- the City of a professional drainage |dan, a comprehensive landscape stabilization plan, ta wefl as an ox>»oa control plan reopnring perkKfic imyectioiis by the City Engineer Ayes 6, Nays I. Smith South's opinion is that the plan should move the house away from the smaller hill. (#4) «I«M DAVID YORKS, 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL DSC PERMIT/V'ARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:20-8:30 P.M. The Affidavk of Pubficatkm and Cotiiicate of Mailii^ were imted Kfrs. Yorfcs was present. Schroeder read a letter addressed to the CHy from Dave Stockdale of Edgewori Buttders, the contractor for the appheation, to be included as part of the public record, stipulating confirmation that proper construction procedures were followed for the retaining wall as required by the City. Mabusth said the application was an emer^ncy situation that devek^wd after the November Piaimii^ Commission meeting requiring the City to make a decision without firA ccMnii^ before the Conunissicn and Council for approval It was discovered that the retaining wall at the top of the bank leading to the lake was in a near state of collapse and measures needed to be taken immediately to safeguard bank before spriiig thaw and rains. The contractor failed to call for inspections during the reconstruction of waOs, although, contractor did work with the City Ei^ineer on the project. Since inspections would not confirm that the wall had been installed as required, the Engineer asked that a letter be aibmitted for the record. There wo-e no public comments. Rowlette fdt there should be no after-the-fiKk penahy due to the circumstaiKes. Rowlette, moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #1986 for an afier-the-ftet conditiorud use permit and setback variance for retaining wall with the recommendation that no penalty be assessed. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5)#1987 LARRY PILLAIL 2705 ETHEL A VENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:30-8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, IW (#S > #1987 Lmy Pillar - Continued) The Applicant was present M^busth reported that the applicatiem tnvoh^ a 10^15' additkHi to the mr a home that was instafled without a buildii^ permit The apphcaitt's intention was to repair sections of the foundation of the three-souon porch, winch also provides an intoior access to the basement vea, and found he nceM to replace foimdations, the wood fiaine walls and rot>f The addition was rebuilt within the origin^ enve lope. AppKcant advised that he has been working on thb profect for a few months The inspectors isaied a stop work order, and applicant was advised of the need fbr a buildif^ permit and survey The sinvey leveaM the porch was 47” fhMn the side lot line The house is 4' Iran said line There is a 14* unimproved alley which sqwiites applicaiit's fiom the property to the i»rth. if the alleyway was vacated, this pit^)erty would receive the benefit of the eventual 14* wide alley Lindquist nroved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #1987 to include a penalty fee for not havii^ acquired a buiidii^ permit and tind addition be completed within 90 days. Ayes 7, Nays 0. !l was noted that the shed on the property was not found on the survey and is located on the property line. The vacating of tlK alley would solve this problem. (M) #19St KENNETH J. SEVERINSON* 2800 SHADYWOOD ROAD • VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING > 8:404:50 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were nofed. The Applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application is fm* a setback variance required for reinstaliation of new wetions, 6-7 in height, of a privacy fence adjacem to the soulhw^ channel side and street side of the property. The original fence continued approximately 8* fiuther along the duumet than the new fence The Applicant said he was unaware of the need for a permit It was discovered after 78*4 of the fence had been replaced. The fence is in the 0-75* zone and is not considered hardcover. The Applicant said the noise level of the area without the (nivacy fence is vary loud and is part of his harddiip statemem. Peterson and Smith were concerned with approving a fence here and settii% a precedent for oclwrs to ftdlow as a reason to grant a future request for fencii^. There were no public comments. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PL/^NNING COMNflSSION MEETING HELD ON JANtfARY 17, 1995 (#6 • #1988 KoBieth J. Severhuon • Continued) SdiFC»der moved, Rowktte seocnded, to af^irove Applicatk» #1988 (sx reconstructkm of the fence diK to the hardships listed. Ayes S, Nays 2, Peterson, Smith Peterson said he would have liked to have seen a lower fence with shaibs to be consifient with other channel properties Smkh coocuned. (#7) #1989 WUXIAM STOOOARIA 2805 KELLY AVENlfE - CONDTIIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:58-9:20 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailif^ were noted The Applicant was present A lettar from the Applicant to Orono <^Rdals was read to be added as part of the pul^c record. It was noted that permits had been received from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Department of the Army/Corps of Engineers for the inHallatioB of the proposed pond Stoddard had been in communication with the City over street flooding matters and wroi^y assumed he had satisfied City requirements. This appfication is a land-use wbmission for a pond for water retention to aid the A that occurs in Kdly Avenue. Mkbusth said the property has a low area approximately 80hc90'm which die Apfdicaiit wouldlike to build a bC^xbO^ pond Landscaping would also involve the placen^ of large rocks around the pond The plan also inchides the reseeding of all distnibed areu to more suitable v^etation The Applicant would also like to realign Ms driveway due to the street flooding and is working with Public Works Dnector Gerhardson on this matter. The City Engineer recommended against large berm or rocks beii^ placed in the unimproved r^ht-of-way. Mabusth noted that this land is not a designated or protected wetland but a low retendcxi area. This project will not impact the Aorm wato^ plan ami will have a minimal eflfect on retemion durir^ flooding It was noted that the S50-600 yards of soil material being removed is now beii% stockpiled but will be moved and trucked out by the contractor. Berg reported having received complaints over the depth of the pond. It was clarified that the pond will gradually deepen to approximately 6* to 8*. It was noted that eight neighbors have signed letters giving thw approval of the pond as loi^ as the pond conforms to rqpilatiofn stipulated by the MCWD, Corps ofEngineers, and the City of Orono. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, IQQ5 (#7 - 419S9 WilKam Stoddard - Continued) Neighbor Clair Rood aiked how the pond n^xild alleviate flooding cd Kelly Avenue. Mabiisth said that it would not soKe Kelly Avenue flooding and woild provide onh a temporary respite for the water, wxtuld not add to tlw floodii^ problem, nor wtxik* it impact any future storm sewers. Peterson moved Rowlette seconded to approve Application #1989 for a condhioMri use permit for a 60^60* area to be upgraded to a type 3 wetland suniKar to the pond developed for a property located at Orono Orchard Road The surroimding area will need to remain natural, wkh cattails, and no mowii^ near the pond The Applicant must work with the Stair on a vegetation plan Ayes 7, Nays 0. («t) #1991 CLAIR ROOD, 2525 SHADYWOOD ROAD - COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:2S-I9:I5 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted The Applicant was present This application is for a proposed office building on the west side o€ Shadywood Road on lot I of Leach Addition Subdivision A comprehensive plan is included for lot 2 of Loich Addition for anotho^ office building, both projects located within the B4 aoning dislikt, and a duplex in the LR>IB zone. The subdivisioa was approved in W78 with a 24* access and utility easement to serve readential lot aloi^ northwest lot line of tot I. Mrixisth sakl the property was the subject of a review in 1980 for an office building, wfatoh never transpired. The Applicant is proposing a I25'x42’ single story office buUdii^ with a south-fitting walkout. Mabusth noted that the parking stalls on the plan were not sufficient for the maximum use potential that a buikbng of this size would demand Although the Appbeam's pUn for the tower level involves storage only, the Chy looks at what the potential use could be in the future for determiniiig parkii^ stalls. If the bufldii^ w»e a sii^ story only, Utt number of stalls would satisfy Chy orditumc^. The pfauis shows 25, 9\I8', stalls The code calls for stalls at 9^c20^. This is a senshive area where drainage is concerned. There is a 12" culvert which drains to the southeast to Lafiiyette Marsh subdivision. Plans for this site must include drauu^e calculations for determining runoff that will leave site at developed level. A retention arm must also be included on this she. It should be noted that hardcover is less than 35% whhin the SOO to 1000' zone Ordinance Section 10.56 allows for hardcover controls for propoties located in commercial zones. Mr r nn i i-iBnuifii i I ■ iWi i riinniii tkv* MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1995 («S > #1991 Clair Rood - Coftinued) Conmiissioo cooccns mvcrfve the use of hardcover with pavcnent withm 20^ of the and with dramage goii^ to tlK from The duplet is {x-oposcd to diare the driveway with thecommerdaiuse which b not allowed The purkmg stalls dso cannot back onto the romiway as proposed The 24' roadway easement is presemly located on the north side of the property in question. The Appbeam is phmning on movii^ thb casement to the oenttf to run between two commercial buildings and down to the proposed duplex. Commisaion members suggested that the applicant consider moving the building settii^ for aesthetic reasons as the back of the prc^»sed building b presently exposed to CoRd 19. Another suggntkm was condaimig the two lots and having OM office iniildii^. The AnAcam antidoates a tease with a rad ^ttte c^Sce (or the one buikk• ilu Schroeder moved, Lmiquist seconded, to table thb Application to allow the Applicant to work with Staff on solving the problems of parking stdis, road egress, and water draifiage and retention Ayes 7, Nays 0 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 12,1994 SinthrUstributed her report rd* the Council meeting to the members of the oommi•.. f ^ ^ I, < («I0) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Mabusth reported that the Council has reviewed the B-2 Ordinance Proposed Amendment and submitted their changes. CcHincil will again review the ordinance at their meeting of Jamiary23, 1995. The Planning Crnnmission has a meeting Friday mmiung. 1/70/95, oo the proposed Wotonka Intervention Project shelter. The Planning Commission meeting in February has been changed to Wednesday, 2/22/95. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (#11) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 21,1994 MEETING Peterson moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 21, 1994. Ayes 6, Nays 0. Smith was not present during the mcnion. a MWUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CX>MMISS]ON MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 17. 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE FEBRUARY II, 1995 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Rowfecte wffl attoid the Fdmiary 13,1995 meeting of the Council. ADJOURNMENT Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to adjourn at 10:20 pm. L ‘/Cu /l I- Chalks Schroeder. Chair Poson 9 ■ I Ill ^ PLANNING COMMISSION Jc COtlHCIL PUBLIC ATTENDANCE -r ^MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME CR NUMBER 1 2 4. WT/S-v,?. «/<-9 4/r <1^ rf^K________-------------1 " ^ 7 f . i,AIf*waa M• a w 1 ^ "mea. -- ^a '.jsrj mnt tm■ ark**m aau —_ L -4K TO:Chair Schroedcr and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE;January 11, 1995 SfRIECT: #1975 Larry Anhalt, 2190 WayzaU Blvd. - Appeals - Continuation of Hearing Addttkmal Exhibits T - Gaffron ’s Sketch U - 1989 Plat Map V - 1994 Plat Map W - Mn/'DOT Improvcmcitt Plan Dated 12/94 X - Mn/DOT Construction Plan The application was ubled at the October 1994 meeting of the Planning Con^ssion because of the length of the agenda. The application was tabled at the November meeting at the request of the City because of the complexity of issues to be addressed and we also lacked a quorum. The appli^tion will be the first item to be addressed on this agenda. The original October packets have been recopied for your convenience. There is only one new issue that staff would like to address. That is the issue of the Impact of the proposed 1995 Mn/DOT improvements of Highway 12 upon the property. The City has received severe* conflicting exhibits that suggest various acquisitions of right-of-way by Mn/DOT. F^t the site plan is inaccurate as it does not reflect the 10’ dedication of right-of-way at the time of the Sugarwoods platting defined as a line drawn between A and B (Exhibit T). In reviewing the current Mn/DOT improvement plans. Exhibits W and X. the right-of-way is shown per Lines C and D. Compare Exhibits U and V. 1989 right-of-way line is completely different from the one shown in the current plat map for 1994. Dennis Hill of the County advises Aat this will more than likely be corrected as he has no proof in his files that such an acquisition has been made in 1994 by Mn/DOT but Mr. Rebers should be able to provkte further cl^fication on this matter. All documentation submitted with a formal application must include accurate dimensions reflecting Mn/DOT’s adjusted right-of-way. Review of Appeals Application The first issue that must be addressed is the issue of the use and whether it is compatible or permitted within the B-1 Zoning District. Staff, once again, strongly suggests that you visit the site of the Pro Tire and Exhaust operation at 571 Tamarack Avenue in the Long Lake Industrial Park. The proposed business use shows a retaU operation with show room and office areas with a garage and car wash to rear (review Exhibit N). Upon resolve of the matter of the compatibility/suitabUity of use then review other issues to be addressed on pages 4 and 5 of the staff memo of October 13, 1994. 0 To:Chair Schroedcr and Orono Planring Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administiatcr Date:November 10, 1994 Subject;#1975 Larr>' Anhr !t, 2190 Wayzata Boulevard -Appeals - Continuation of Public Hearing B C D E F G H I List of Exhibits Submitted in Current Information Staff memo of October 13, 1994 A - Application Applicant ’s Addendum Plat Map Property Owners’ List Survey Gustafson Letter of October 7, 1994 Engineer’s Sketch-Possible East/West Alignment for Access Road Staff Sketch-Possible Shared Access Page 4 of Resolution No. 2653 Granting Aj^roval of Preliminary Plat of Sugar Woods Supplement to Subdivider’s Agreement (Sugar Woods) Page 1 of First Amendment to Declaration of Covenamts Sections of Comp Plan Amendment Dealing with Approved Plans for Future Development of ftoperty Comp Plan Amendment No. 2-Transportation Policy Site Plan Site Data Facts Existing Zoning Boundaries Zoning Map Ordinance No. 64, Second Series, Rezoning of Former RR-B Property to R-IA Sewer and Water As-Builts Gustafson Report of October 21, 1994 J K L M - N - O - P-1 P-2 Q - R - S - Status of Application The application was tabled at applicant ’s request at your October 17th meeting. Since staffs preparation of the original packet for your October meeting, the City Engineer has submitted an update report, refer to Exhibit S. Gustafson advises that Mn/DOT will allow a curb cut to the property as part of the Highway 12 safety improvement project scheduled for 1995. It would appear that there may be a n^ to acquire additional right-of-way from the owner to complete the improvements. For more information on the issue of access to the property, members should refer to sections of Comp Plan Amendment No. 2 (Exhibits L and M) and in the many Sugar Woods plat documents (Exhibits 1, J and K). The packet for the October 17th meeting lias been recopied for Planning Commission members’ convenience. ti' To: Orono Ranning Conimission Membcn ^__ Mayor CalUhan and Orw Councilmcmbcrs Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Fronn Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building A Zonii« Administrator Date:October 13, 1^)94 Subject:#1975 Urry Anhalt. 2190 Wayzala Boulevard - Appeals - Public Hearing Zoning District: B-l/RR-lB ApplicaUon: App.icamhas^ use would '0'^°™ “ <*'™‘ ' nrf o^r of die property at the time of the Sugar Woodsu^wouldconformto,*^ pt-aiiiuiig issues ag ' i i h hc. matters that must be resolved before a commercial use r:^v A»^^^ busmess. Pro Tire and Eahausi. is locaied in thesubdivtston. There are Tire imd Exhaust, is located in the to this review: 1.Section 10.06, Subdivision 3, 3 (B) - Appeal. Directives of 2.Section 10.40. Subdivision 4 (A) - Garage. Applicant r^ld section for a cond.tional use permit to allow the Commission is asked to review the proposed use to confirm confonnince witli tne ordinance. Review Section 10.40. Subdivision 1 - Putposefintem of Zoning District. Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 - B-1 Standards. Required lot area *“ 20,000 s.f. Existing = 46,206 s.f. +, B Required lot width — 100 Exiting = 148’ C.Front yard = 20 ’ Proposed = 40’ Rear yard = 30’ Proposed = 30’ 1 • • /jming File #1975 October 13. 1994 Page 2 E.Required structure setbacks. Front and rear Required » 35’ Proposed front *= 114' Proix>sed rear = 60’ Side Required West side East side 15’ 15’ 72 ’ F.Height limitation * 2V4 stories or 30’. Applicant has not provided elevations of structure at this point Ln the review. list of Exhibits A B C D £ F G H I J K L M N O P-1 P-2 Q R - Application Addeixlum Plat Map Property Owners’ List Survey of Outlot E Gustafson Report Engineer ’s Conceptual Transportation Plan Engineer ’s Amentoent to the Site Plan Page 4 of Resolution No. 2653, Approval of Sugar Woods Plat-References to Outlets E, E arid F Supplement to Subdivider’s Agreement for Sugar Woods First AmetKlment to Declaration of Covenants for Sugar Woods Pages 49-52, Comp Plan Amendment No. 2, Alternatives for Development of Property anl Surrounding Area Transportation Plan-Comp Plan Amendment No. 2, Pages 61 & 62 Commercial Site Plan Site Data Official Zoning Map Zoning Boundary Map-Deuil Ordinance No. 64, Second Series, Zoning Boundary Change as a Result of Sugar Woods Plat, Rezoning to R-IA Sewer and Water As-Builts A • • Zoning File #1975 October 13, 1994 Page 3 Review of Appncatkm The cuneiu owner of the property is offering Ouilot E for sale for commercial use. The maiotitv of this property except for the north 55' is zoned B-1, RetaU Sales Business District. The orOTOsed use would involve the selling of tires, exhaust systems, alignments, shocks, struts trailer l^hes oil changes and brake service. The proposed use includes not just retail sales of the various items but also of the servicing and installation. There is linie direction m your code. There is no definition for a garage. The zoning code conditional use section merely sutes that garages for the servicing and repair of automobiles ate allowrri provi^ repair ftinctmns are Totally enclosed in a building. Review the purpose or intent of the code, hi^ivision 1. You may wish to visit the facility witlnn me Long Lake Industrial Park on the south side of Highway 12. Outlot E was created with the platting of the Sugar Woods subdivision. The but with specific planning goals. (Review Exhibits I, J and K) Review Exhibits P-1 and P-2, the directives of Comp Plan Amendment No. 2. of a lot within the B-1 zoning district. Review Exhibits I, J. K. L. M and N. all documentauon created for the Sugar Woo^ plat advised the subdivider and current owner that when the comnwreW developed that frontage road would have to be designated. With the ^ a buildable lot, the City will expect at a minimum that the east/west road be defined wi plat. Access to this site is very difficult to resolve at this writing becaua we ^ from Mn/DOT. The upcoming safety improvements in 1995 may prohibit creauon « curb cut. Any access approved at Highway 12 would be temporary M it is Plan Amendment No. 2 to have all commercial uses •?*iS!afi on the site Gustafson in his report (Exhibit F) notes that applicant should provjde plan as to how ftimre access to the fronuge road to the north would be ^ tUommended that a tempotary solution for the property might be creation of a ^^^ess with the Wear property to the immediate east. Review Exhibits F, G and H, ’ sketches of a potential frontage road location and sighting of the temporary shared access. I Zoaiuf File #1975 October 13, 1994 Page 4 Review Exhibit R, sewer and water are immediately available to this property at Highway 12. Tlie owner has been assessed 44 sewer and water units. Tlie paymem cunenUy ass^ ... . ^ ^ i ■ ■ail .AM •• 1 UClC ^ should advise how many units he wishes to assign to applicanfs propeny as pan of sale a^ment. Applicant may wish to keep aU 44 units for Outlet F. In this case, the City w,II directly charge the future owner sewer and water units. General Comments on Proposed Site Plan• I lf." 4 wa^ ate usually assessed several sewer and water units. TTie locauon of the car wash may be an issue later in the more formal review. Issues for Resolve 1.Is the use permitted based on the purpose/intent of the B-1 RctaU^lcs Bu^ss District and per the recommendation set forth in Comp Plan Amendmen for this area (Property No. 4, Fjthibii L)? 2.If the use is found compatible with the B-1 zoning district, the followiiy must be resolved by current owner of property before a formal condi permit application can be accepted by the City. Subdivision of property redesignating ouUot to a lot and definmg of a future east/west road. a. b.Rezoning of 55’ RR-IB parcel to B-1. Resolve of temporary access to this property if the fiontoge road is not installed to north at this time. d. 3.Upon filing of a conditional use permit with the City, applicant shall provide the following: - - - ----------*- --- --- Zoning Fdc #1975 October 13, 1994 Pages Site pUn/survey locating all improvements b. E>etailcd grading and drainage plan. c. d. Landscaping plan plus planting schedule. Elevations and floor plan of proposed structure subject to special ^Uding design and construction standards of the B-1 code for all exterior wall finishes. Applicant is again advised of the need to not exceed a 30’ height. e.Preparation for a permit application with the Minnehaha Creek Waterslad District to review all grading and drainage plans. Planning Commission Acti The only Klion of the PUnning Commission is to confirm for wl'can' neimitted or not permitted within current B-1 code and per Comp Plan Amendment No. 2. a^ ^t if dK use is framed that prior to applicant fUing a conditional use petmit U“t pro^rty must be redesign,^ as a buildable lot. the noithera 55’ of the parcel must be tezoneU to B-1 and temporary access to site must be resolved. Isv • •4'^ 1 rX €I ^ V* tX' O f -i /V CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION \ i Site Address QS ^ ^ »Q ^ ^^1*^0 Vi3 Type of Application to be Filed --------------- Property Idcniificaiion Number (P.I.D.) —il'Ci—ir TS hCLA -am QO applicant , a 1 1 L Name L-^V v/ y ^ « ---------------- /-T". . Phone (home) *3>0)^ - OWNER (i^digre^than applicant) Name tii L-/ Rione (home) ■ ■ i Phone (work)/ L Date Property Acquired_____^------------------__ I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.(X3 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use ” S2(X).00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ~ $175.00 Guest Housc.Guest Apartments ~ $150.00 Duplex Credii/Bldg ” $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use " $200.00 Land Alteration "____ Grading and filling - designated wcUand or floodplam Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ~ $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) ' After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation * $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ’ $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ’ $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____LS I Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). (month/year) riTv rr rfOn^ir till Wf k.*MVMU uFFIL I’JzOEOOCOO 01 Utrl 1C 1 rA VCHtCS Tl ntaiPr-TFANS r ^314650 iCOl ROl 0> f. 4 ^ SOMITTALS \//Completed Application Form Describe requ^ in detail.♦ • 4. 5. 6. 7. T^rcrtified Property Ownen List of owners within 350’ (you can obtain this list froip "^ Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Cenif Sc of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -----Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades) 8 9. 10. changes m eievauon . . / List of the legal (include marital satus) of all persons with an mterest m the ■^✓property This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). v/ Comtruction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. SUBMITTED. (Staff wUl require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) n« Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Pleam remember that your application is not complete if the above infoimauon has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Appheation Initials of Clerical Suff:_________________________ Th^l^ provide all information required « supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Dateq. <?y members for purposes of Jnvestigation and verification of this request. rr... Owner’s icant must have all submlaais into theApplicant must have all subml^^into the City offices 25 days before the Plmhi^ scheduled hnM on th^ third Mondav of each month. Applicants must be p^ « mCo^ion Meetings are held on the Utird Monday of month review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. Ifan^plicant is _ „ — ».nmetreview meeungs of the Plannmg Commission ana i-ouncu. i « “• •- Bnildina A Zoning Office please make anangemenis to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Buiwmg at of this change prior to the meeting. J u September 9, 1994 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST 571 TAMARACK AVE LONG LAKE « MN . 55356^ (612) 473-4261 #1975 To Whom It May Concern: rs::.sn:; Nursery ). The only drawback to our business has been a lack of visibil­ ity. traffic flow, and especially space. Being on highway 12 would give us the visibility needed to serve this areas needs and also to double our business in 1-2 years. Most repairs are completed the same day of the would not have vehicles stored for extended periods, /s for the was te issue, all junk tires would be stored neatly out of . the building with regular scheduled pickups by liscensed haulers. Old oil and filters would be stored properly above ground and disposed oT by liscensed haulers. Currently our business hours are Monday thru Friday SjOO a.m. 6:00 p.m. and Saturday 8:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m.. In a new facility we would extend our hours to Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. and Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.. Because the nature of our business is such that we do not typ ically see our customers 1-2 times a year we need the high visiDi- lity of the highway and it’s traffic count in order for ness to thrive. Ue believe that the proposed location would easily double our business within 1-2 years and hopefully triple in 3 thereby generating substantial revenues both for our business and the cities. Ue welcome any questions or concerns that you may have while deciding on our request. Once again, Thank You for your time and consideration given to this proposal I Sincerely ^rence UrS-ftLawrence Owner nhalt ?605.65 «E5 ----- \ *Ht. *;t.,.V# ...... ■C,5S* « 312.72 OUUQt A ’dm. l>«. 14 .«MB*si‘Ort Is 'if ^•^loToT TBT PLAT V^AY/A ft 09) R 3 fi (17) S LCst/G4fAiQon \ ooc m nm\ “ 353 42 sar»4rt ai. (44) u 4 '•" / Hf 101.03 Ja"* *7 4 S* S s ^(23) 0 ( luaj (20 0 El OtfTlOT r. ^ S«r*4rc r-V ouncn r (») 27I.T1 WAYZATA BLVD W nj i I mai42A I IP R/W PLAT lira ai M Al m 22301 209 90oe 5 (46) (09 ___lao >•(/> i/> 2:0.20 [t > •i (2» i> 5 •. ?-'•»i , " (26) *i ««o) =« (W*! 22f.0l ^4c ISsSSl-! 5. * m^ f Si mm JlMl ‘F.34 - imSTRIAL IIPARK!71T. It I- t0l4t •Si&t3< .....- imo «t ; (42) l« (55) •far>V/ 4 10 » I (23) J 3 (20. run w IS* J (96) JllJl l«|tV!lf# I (50) A U!(51) MI.OJ ■ftmtiweTeff ■NORTfCRN- »*> ,.i, ».'»>V=».__.'i. I 44130 T I *it •17 1 r/ri 7A M .rt 1 1 (6) ?656.11 RES ^V-V : MM wTf flt/tim tvl*'•• •• ■.•.♦!• ■'!•%*mmm • ' •'.MTCN MS MOS NAVZAT* M.VD M • tare HILLIAN N MlA« ZIAO NAYZATA tLVB tSM LONi LAKE m 5SS5« i {l-.TNRrHTtll / /SA-lie-ZS Z1 * ^r.\ Otcil NAW m OQZS OZlOi • SU6ARN000 CK < REBCRS CONSTMUCnOM CO " KMRS CONSTRUCTION CO ^MlAfC/AOOfl W-SSZB MiBSTER AVC Mn RIB IM « 5SA14 . • f SB'-'SA-llB- »:? mOB AOMI ^ .BZm BII • fit OMMR NAME fSB'SA-llB-ZS ZZ 0017 i .ttn bine rioge u E • C I L' OTTEN TAXBAVERV .i ClIffORO • LOUISE OTTEN i^i^>}.NAME/ABOR tB.O BOK AA9 V • t' t»«"LARE W 55S54i • ;••• V 7z;i S4*11B-ZS zs 000» "'^;;BMB,'ABBR .VOOSZO- BRINHALl AVC .‘.i'] 0»MER NAME-V EARL H DAY A SONS INC );^yTAXBAVCIU.V: J.A N BROBCRTIES INC !;^'>:HAfC/AB0R ’• ZB15 NCRENZIi BT RO iW’-: eoBZ __ _ _ _ _ _HAYZATA BIVO H )-V^(»fCR NAME BBCBQRV H SRAUCHNESY ••«■>;,BBOBi AOOB BZB7S M >1 •V. ! TA)<BAYCR;<- iW lQNB LAKE FORD TRAcTOR INC NriH(;iura/AOBB|::;!zo7S h navzata.blvb LONB LAKE 1*1 -SSSSA fSfBCBIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMAnON SYSTEM BROBERTY t»*€RS LISTSB 5«*UB-Z5 Z1 MZl ozloz SU6ARN000 N RCBCRS CONSTRUCTION CO RCBCRS CONSTRUCTION CO SSZS NCBSTER AVC MBU IM S541* U .S4-11B-ZS Z1 BOSZ OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNEB SIBNET B B BARBARA RCBCRS SIDNEY B A BARBARA RCBCRS SSZS NEBSTCR AVC ST Loms BA« m 55A1A SO SA*11B-ZS Z* 0001 BZIZO NAYZATA BLVO N NILLIAH NEAR CTAL klLLIAM N NEAR SB MACKBCRRY HILL LONB LAKE IM 55S5B 7Z S4-118-ZS Z5 00Z5 OZZ^S NAYZATA BLVO N BERRY'S VENTURES INC BERRY'S VENTURES INC ZZO; N NAYZATA BLVO LONB LAKE »M 55154 'Tt' i4-118-ZS 24 0040 . 0M7S HAYZATA BLVO H .Mcbqry H SRAUGHNCSSY LONB LAKE FORD TRACTOR Iftt Z07S N HAYZATA BLVO R'O tox 497 LOliB LAKE IM 55154 ! • '•• i .! • T* : I* • t.; • \' >.* v*» • r •4 I ^ ” Sn?mr m:4 fX%5S401 V" / > * • I 'i;. •i* fSB S4-110>ZS 0Z104 SUBARlIOOO RCBCRS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTIOrt CO 1525 NCBSTER AVC HBLS IM 554i4 SB S4-llB<zi OOOSB AOORCiS CAL OTTEN CLIFFORD A LOUlSC OTTEN BOX Z49 . LONB LAKE HN ' BtSSi SB S4-11B-ZS Z4 005B OOOSB AOORCSS UNASSIBNCOi SIDNEY B A BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY B A BAMARA RESCRS 35Z5 NCBSTER kvC ST LOUIS BARK IM 55414" ■ i-zsisd<»r'^"*^>'^®72 S4-11B OZZOB HAYZAtA BLVB N; PERRY'S VENTURES INC ' BERRY'S VENTURES INC 2205 HAYZATA *LVO H LONG LAKE HN 55S54 i’ ‘ . ' ^ I . 'I. 'iim pi • >. » 4 * A’'Vv .1- . *• . *v ‘ : •t •- • • I ‘ {., • i rr/ * X : V - !.^ X* !• * • 'It . . ,•••> ri» .'••■I.'► . i: • •. -4! .4 Pfill JV'i > T [«• t ti:rs |4I • c ;• i.i* If;. */'MTl M/tsm " '<: • ! I■*>'>' •' Air.-!': ■ri.VV.iVv . '•■••Eil'A' -it i KWCMM COUNTY, niQKRTY INFOmATIQN SYSTEM! . MOKRTY 0I4CRS LIST MfOlir NO ' f/ ^ r VT '•■'"«• i‘k^*i“-*‘ *'•Si M S't• r • .* i • • '• • t • *• i •'SraSrR'jV'>T^ i»'V - til *' •• •1 •.» J , V . ■ ■u. . ,• ••■ •: Aj^iiS'aaSaft.e ■tin • %. t # ,\ih • .i-vi y .• ^ ^ • .\ •’. • ■ •r '■ ,r iwr tliiiif-r:1 '■•.■’ •" ■! ^ -Y t"' ' 1*4 »•***’■ *• M * 4 • •••♦».• . .: . . V. -V ■“ '^• '/•,••■ ;• ^ j. Y‘* ^ • ‘ ••/ . • -V' ; • i • .' • k *i • ^ • * • .mm • ; .• ••, ■ ' r . ■ • !>• s'- \ •'. i.‘ ;• • *».•>:'';. . ‘ • ‘ ‘*- ‘.-V 'i'd * ' \f' : • • H 4 aasiiJsk ^ ‘ : \ •• 1. ♦ • . •. • > 3 .» .. ♦ *. • .* •• ••»■ •- .*. Wi mmiW ■ V** ■ • ■ ■ •■«.■• ■■ '•• i i. • '• • •.■•.,=•••■•/ .;= . ..» , I V.*.*; * •• i) *;•! t CERTIFY THAT THE fAbTS RbMEscMrib ARE AN AcojiuTE aMd ti<ub^: ;i •>.' , ! ijj RERRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS XT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THf RECORDS i .| Of THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OERARTNENT OF PROPERTY tAXATltiNf TQ THE KST Of My rnonledge and belief f •* t. •DATE ikim'i. Ifefgj Midi' ‘ \ ’ .. ijN-. M../ !•> 1 it . ili'fcfei • 1- . !. 4 if • (!,•:.■»:!. • C • • ;;••.•*: ? • • •-.i f; '•: ;•..*• V .. ry- UA ■' = •■ -■ ’■ .•’• :< .’•■.iV': }..;/ .:. ; :'v|iV •. its . ■• »• i, : •-'t j-v 'i • *:;»• • *1 ; ::..;:i . • •. i. ' .5'; • T )fr •S IIn i; t! ,!i 4 • ■;l *♦ »? 1V'^'''A-’v 5 ''• 'S ' ) I « » » rm B 1 )(7 H v'^ JwSWT!- i^W' ■ iOV r»i . !•! / Vj f * r » ■» <f»\ / I • • ' ^p/i i? oj / ^ >. r-V A/ 'V f" ; 7- ;• ■ ‘j.-l-^j / / 4l. * i! pt-' tllL. f"! ».vi: Will ■, /. • o 2 ' -. 5p® . i 1 9 i <1I W ‘ • f. _ (f324'.OP ‘.J_____ ^ i '334.52«eas^ I <;^q;?i9jS© e «2>ISK:Ui4Ud<ti [^’i • I ‘’V‘ OOk?^ m§s !: "'iwll ^ I'l «; i/|r:‘l» f* VM ^ h‘4;» |i^ / *. •rilii.'l.V l|!,.i/ i:n| ;lfe*/.»''H ’;.V ••'i" “"4. 188.9„ N 02°19 ’|)0 ’ I\W i 2,# - lif .1 ?#f!i . . 'V 10.04^V v>5 ■ N 02®19'00 ” E '•—*• 231.71 meas.^^^\^ TORRENS CASE NO. 17100 "'^Xn _______ 232.24 \ J;\« •iili:., mlli JifiSf Q);;00 OI -221.67- li "A Ai ;r. ;i;*Uv 4». T ii t—'m ‘ *.T^’ .'U; 8 s 100 1 .’jfV t'lp' •mu 7;- \ /SjHi I *“?ii. .'W ■:'s!iaei ■ • : m|«h«03 i0iwO'!i Is t fo c a>(/) •r> t rt V’ s? V\i 'ill:i ?:4t 4.' m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates w c t n n* n Cii*in • Cam. ^ i Nom n Mmm. cm C< M A A t W Q i C A A f ^f. n pf PI AlA Pf Pf Pf AiCP llP'Oi Pf Mmyo mmaoK Pf Irat i PpiMA Pf P AAflMA Pf M«C OayO f taf iMit ' PI. pf Pii PC Enginem A Aixhltects October 7, 1994 A Gary W A i A PM i ^ Pf OMUi A Site Pf A i ivnms Pi P^i Mra. Pf MM Q M«Aiii P flu Pf Mint Pf ALA Pf Pf Pi pfi ^iwn 0 Cfoia PMO JMaP Qi OMi A LM M IMpM i Pf. l Pi Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth» Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post OfBce Boa 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 *• m ■ • OCT 11 1994 * A ^ ^ Pro l ire & Exhaust File No. 139-1975 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the site plan for Pro Tire and Exhaust located on Outlot E, Sugar Woods addition along the North side of Highway 12, 0.25 miles west of Brown Road. The acce» onto Highway 12 is a major concern. We have forwarded the site plan to Mn/DOT for their review but have not yet received their comments. Until the application has been reviewed and approved by MnDOT, we cannot determine if the site plan is feasible. We are certain that access to Highway 12 will be more restricted in the future. The City should plan for an east-west frontage road between North Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road (sec figure 1, it is only a schematic). When this road is completed, the commercial area along the north side of Highway 12 would access to the north. The proposed site plan should show how the future access would be orientated. The Highway 12 safety improvement project scheduled for 1995 will include a median on Highway 12 that restricts the access to right-in and right-out only. These improvements will likely require additional right-of-way along the north side of Highway 12. If the new access to Outlot E is approved by MnDOT, we would recommend that it be a shared access with the adjacent property, and that it includes a right-turn lane. This would require that a 40 X 50’ right-of-way be acquired on the lot line for the access (see figure 2). Any changes m the right-of-way would change the setback locations and impact the site plan. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 : 0) < f! f * • I, ■ * m '.Jill____^ ^ ------- — ,‘- \'J.'<^‘ » .; Z *• 5 rvj-—:_j 3'—V- • .' • - ‘ ^ — ij:.' * 1 ^ • f' ¥/A /1 “ I1 QRONC^ City of OROIVO 'T RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ---^653_ _ _ _ _ _ 7 Al 1 cfifistmction vehicles used for the xnsteXletlon of North. The subdivider shall be held responsible for the enforcement of the approved traffic pattern. •j PT*ir»r to the filing of the final plat, associated documents and covenants, the installed in or near Highway 12 by the City. 4 outlot D, a portion of future east/west road located within the commercial zoned portion of be installed at the time of the City p or the development of the Wear propertyLl obtlineS ^ alternate legal accea. ’^^rou^h Outlot E to the Wear property all subject to the approval of the CityJ. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be io,^1990with the Registrar of Titles on or before January iu» ?og.tfef w!?h a certified original copy of this reMol^tion jin»i executed cooies of the easements and covenants noted "ove* The exe/ution of the plat by the City ot Ozone and the filing of the plat ahall be coneluaive subdivider has satisfied all conditions sot forth in this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution that the plat has not been filed by the date specified abo e event, it will be necessary to file a new applicatio City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 10th day of July, 1989. ATifisT: iL>gZ'77n.I/DorothyQ Eallin, City ClerJc es R. Gt Page 4 of 5 •• #7S0 sxrrnxxart to nu2 3rriDni*» Acmir^izar OMtiot«Sionoy 0« sn4 B^rban B*fe«ra, •• fM owt«rft cf w«w*w D C «nd r. SOCJUI «OOOS, B«nn*pin County, Nlnn«sota, h#r*bv vena# Subdlvidor'M A*jr**B*^t .July 21, 10#<, tevtvuvr. t?ia Cl ot Croro und Bubur* Con*txuotlen Co. *Ji«y cenount t3 ^ construction of l>l«n A snd Plan • laprovosonts ss d•s=ri^.*U in «. sorssaont upon Outlets 0. E snd T. Tftsy «cknoulsd9« t*n.At slt.neu Outlots 0, f ana P »rs ssparata paresis and can bs aaparats csnvsyod. /•iJ Outlets cannot bs dsvslopsd by t.i»a, t.ns s^csssers cr assigns, vithout furtbar approvals froa tbs City * • . ^' • • •1 « • Orono• 6 art ail STATE cr HINHESOTA ) ) ••• COUNTY OF KEnJEPIN ) Th« fcaragolnc ln»tru»«nt was acknowledged fe/ Sidney 9.o ' before me un thie ^ dey of July# 19?9a >tMjU m as Notary ••• •». STATE or MINNESOTA )V I* «41I'#• • J05JTY CP WCmEPIU ) Ths foregoing ^nstcuasnt was acisnovlsdgsd by barbara BsbafS. ' :e me on this .JjJi^dsy of July# Ifttabefore / R^ary m V. This instrusant was draftad byf 5 •' •• UOKABO, STBEET AMD DCXHAAO CTTW) ISO South Fifth Straat Suits 2300 Hinnsapolls, hinnaacta S5402 • wV"-* K-i lev'll i ■ 20403S0 K »t»*t akchomsmt to Di:c:..-\nATl03 CTVciiwrro.w= l:7..™«rt. r.« «<!.■« woo=» __ r im BAclQ tt^l* 15th d«y ot 5»pt%i«i>«r , ifSf c, “.Vtu. CO Jiaticnal As30C<ctlon (U»* "Lende^ )• a_S.S_JJILJULJ5 A. Th* Cclarntlon of <>vonants. t?C::sLr.uri*r.l,r-“Ir-- .. ... . R«qi*tr«r of Txt:«* on Soptembor 13, *»«*» n Th» D*cl.rntioM c-jvors tno raal l-o^>crty in n^nnvp;.; ccuntyi Min-mooLa, legally i,.-rvibca n.. rollovs. Lots 1 throtigl* (S, OlocK I; _ Lots I thrc'jgh C, Olcr?: 2; ' Lots I tiuougli 5. Uleck 3; ‘ _ Lots I through n. 01»jc K 4; andLOCS k tniw«v*' ff. outlets A, 0 and C; ‘*":r* • ft ^ • in sIta R vioou S, nur;ordi''g to c 3v Roatt dated septnnoer a, J9»9 and riJed In th-s Cili-: - o£ the'nanr.apin o"rOn “nc'‘-cWiir pJblif r;;i Ju^po^.s cC-ir-budot C. SUCAK V.0Cn5 . ^ D. The o"r"th P niu.'" VoVt^wi n. l"« « Ooco..... HO. :03.795 covert.., .< Lots and O*itlots In Sugar Woods. *. », Qoi. c„u «.a. a..c.t n.M Vj" eerie, or til. “'"'■’>’1.' CooH.y ?J3*203«757'thc M,ool.,t too .>c„ir-!(l 1999. as Document H<>«.Z038796 ••J 2038^^ fss tltlo to Outlets A. D, C an«J J, u.u^ r -ho OscUtant. tho Association and tho Unn-tor now int......i tc r.ubj«ct‘outlot 0, SUGAR WOOL'S, to thO Drcluiutiun. .MOW, TMZREroUC. tlis Declaration is hertbv ..wo.-dr-d •»• X. capitalized tor^s used horniu Shall h.- and ofCoct S6 in tho Dsclaration unla-s othsrwlso. tlSS. AND /RIOR TAXES PAIf) uert cr p«cu*!t 7 ttt 1 h« ij rtcosf TRArNLilR Ri'^CRiO SEP 21 u i '.1 • t L Recommended Alternative - ' ■■ • The recommended alternative# which is includes a further extension of the limited/office commercial business district back from Highway 12# with a remote frontage road on the back portion of this district similar to figures 31 and 32. Prior to the development of the commercial portion of this property# the existing intersection at Brown Road and Highway 12 shall be improved so that safety concerns associated with the current use and future increased use of this intersection are addressed. Configuration of the frontage road and North Brown Road would be determined at the time of development. Frontage road access to Highway 12 could either be opposite Brimhall Avenue in Long Lake# and/or on Willow Drive opposite the frontage road between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. The property north of the commercial area would be single family with sewer and water planned for the area. With sewer and water services available to the property# the owner could submit a 1 and 2 acre mixed single family density alternatives for Council consideration. The maximum allowed density acceptable would not exceed that outline in the alternative 3# subject to utility availability# appropriate density# buffering# etc. The residential area would be served by a cul-de-sac or circular road off Brown Road with no connection to the west if the frontage road is installed .A, i' 9I ! it t A ai<igmative HO. 3_-Fro]o»mors Proposal - »t th. b.glnnin, of the proc... th. own.r .ub«itt.d . .ch». for dovolop-ent of the proporty, which wa, .ub.o<r..ntly ...na.d by th. owner during th. proc... which provid.a a. ahown in Figure 32 fers A combination of land 2 acre aingl. family lot. on th. north portion utilising municipal s.rvic. Th. two acr. .ingl. family ar. u..d to buff.r th. 2 acr. una.wer.d lot. to the north and west. orovide for a remote frontage B) The southern portion does provia« B Road west to the western edge of the property,from Brown Road west to _ / / property Owner Proposal Area 4 „Fig. 32 i L . • • • • .« Alternative No. _2 - Xlt.rnative 2 would allow for business/cormercial abutting Highway 12 to be served by a remote frontage road that would eventually extend over to Willow Drive. The north side of this would provide for eulti-resid.ntial with the bulk of the northern ait. developed at the unsewered 2-acre residential. Connection of the Single family to Pine Hidge Lane is optional, and would be eliminated from consideration in exchange for frontage road between North Brown Road and Willow Drive. r. • * •#•* • alternate 2 Area 4 Fig. 31 4- J.5 Property >»o- * Tnfroduetlen - Thi« 45 acre grouping is currently under t»o oenerships with the majority ot it toned rural residential single family. Approximately 10 acres abutting Highway 12 aie currently zoned B-1 residential business district. All but approximately 3 acres of this are under a single owner. Typical concerns for this property include access to Highway 12 and North Brown Road together with the concern for safety at the North Brown Road and Highway 12 intersection. Discussion of Alternatives ~ Alternative No. 1 " Present Zoning If this property were to develop as it is currently guided and zoned, it would result in a narrow strip of commercial uses along Highway 12. However, since these businesses will be restricted from direct access off Highway 12, some form of frontage road will need to be provided. If this area were to be served by a frontage road adjacent to Highway 12, it would represent an expensive solution to this problem since^his ro^ would only be developed on one eide.;^^ 1• • • « • •••c•t «## * .1 f • •«••• ••• */ ' -m --iiilliiiiii I *** '' •*Mlliip ♦• •e-N /f.'- • • •xr I .*;• '• e» « I. * I 1 i it •■d/... arfpa i Drive, and to limit direct access on to Highway. 12. • ^ Additionally, by providing retail services and housing in close proximity to the existing arterial, transportation demands on * other transportation corridors should be diminished. It is anticipated that the general transportation needs will be within existing capacity and that this development will not exacerbate existing problems with he system. It is anticipated that this development should pay for the local cost of improvement, at least the intersection control points together with payment of a substantial amount of the frontage road improvement (less any appropriate MSA funding for such roads). - MiTTHdUt* ArlarUI •tmtm MiarArtttlii Q Eiiseigavid City of Orono HKIHWAV 12 COfWOOR STIOV «t«Aar 1854 A CMyTitM WMtam Portion Proposed Transportation Systom i Fig. 38 Sk e fjB It <9 * i i 9^ %■i ^r. fh interceptor is the Maple Plain/Long Lake interceptor* a force main that exists within corridor. As is noted on page 28* it is anticipated that this MWCC force main will not be utilized for service in the area* with some noted exceptions. This is in part based on the fact that Orono was in opposition to installation of the subject force main* and the fact that the operating capacity of the line* will probably allow for only 50 units for that section between Old Crystal Bay Road and the Long Lake pump station. The anticipated net increase in units for this area will b^^j in the range of approximately 500 {600 total units in the Medina/Orono/Long Lake line, minus 116 units currently allocated to the City of Orono). It is anticipated that the net addition of 500 units will not be of significant impact either to the interceptor system discharging to the Blue Lake Treament Plant nor to the plant itself* given that this change would be while there are upgrades anticipated at the Blue Lake plant. 3. TRANS PORTATION One of the primary goals during this study was that any altered development should be of a nature that would pay for improvements to the corridor. The primary improvements would be installation of frontage roads both to the north and south of Highway 12* together with improved intersection control* at least .at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. The intent is to keep local east/west traffic off Highway 12 as much as • practical* to provide local traffic with at least one more intermediate control point for crossing Highway 12 at Willow •• • I t•r Ti I t-STTEPMA O ^ r ‘ » • •• ■* ^<1^ ^ _v • •Tp» ♦» ♦ • r:»,-“ -“^ ^ •; *' •- PABKHQ nETAL 1200SF/150 0FRC6 600/200 q/^GE ® STALLS(2) total needed total SHOWN 8 3 10 21 30 SITE DATA» ________ iuLDB>«AHEA 56S0 SOUAHE FEET STE AREA W2 ACRES /A • r **v** ’ *.*r*-* • j-®***^»• •• •- • • V • • % ’ I •-»r I I**' y ‘t t* . > •' a™r->r..j___ m\! w, 'M ■|'3'i >?kJfi LLiiiji I i • i ^1 • ai.p NTiri I l *'l » • ■ • i Iferk;- I *x 8«- %. I X«m.. !•» K I f- I muT^T ___ . iUi.il ly.M IV.ll ^ s■WA * • :» B ’ : '. • '• ; 1' • j|l'- fi V'fi' il:.!<.:•;!!'ft k. :Sxn iiS:m Ir ’ o- •f?:' ‘ *'..* V - ^ iV»; » W K«v» “ X J|o e? ITT.<S K>e.y iirTi jfLfy *4i .^\rr U?.T7 »I14S Mfl). •J - iM.n 25 5.30E5 4^viy :Tnv' n • Tl? 41 ® -BReWN-Re-N'IITO T h4)1Q <t%)y n.ft4 ;:^. |i •f I iliv‘11li-' :»;K' MV. :*.qi Vii ; . • . ;«* {'IV! :i.''■l•i?''l f v"- ’f'll m-m i‘I * I|L,;3 ■•!. i’l 'l iimr "■ !'!% >' mi' n rFf ' M I 5i 33 r . Sraib PEE0S^iiil 3 Hli'‘:>« fe ^ C«k jf r - !♦ 'i #■" •AAAAAAAAAAA••••••««•«•••••••••«**•••«\«AA*a . • * • 1 *^7 11»' simi o I?:!. ' '' . •'■ ;;i.- • • J;<'!5'!i > .■! ,;l... i -ii v^'-‘ •■ .5 ;l :i!i'iit'.' .. f'P'f "I*•SiilMli:t • • •« .1 M M- '■ i^T: fi) UmvM BAY I .‘.r,. 1 {!••},-• ;• 3 I : N!-' ■•'’•■=''■•■'I'.SH ’,! vW-:i •) Wear Lon* N. rMv'' I - irV.-iv I' • • -s ^ * f.'. I i :'■ iV.' •; \v i -‘H!•;• ;.•^f 1.' ‘ ’ iV - ■ ......... ..............................Golden View]' Ijf !' “iTiiail# I 0^o^, i'^sbOTO'f^ iil' |j' \ 'l iVj °1 i^countrysldi 4tu-: At:;,U:VaV^. hach !V. lail^a v- ?:• ' • * 1 ' . •* • *1. I • .e l.;,' c N*1 y'%Wi Vi II .. in •s . » ;«t 1 Clr. HACK |< I ••'I ...;\’| r...,• • ■,ii. Val LOW - ' ‘W\^ ^'wnij-wom ( o^ tali* Cf'“•' BROWN !ii...... ■y. BsA'int .1 • 1 -t* r DUPONT S :!(!• ‘ * /> TAMARA ,-Ci • S3 i' f. VIRONIA AVEl — '■, V.: 1 >?■• ' "<••• • S i>, s k *,K t j .'• • V ,i»0V '.ai':-,^r •■v'lv- ii!!;."if '■ i’i'' •", '''.'orchard '' ' view IS If ■■11'Mf V '■? -v; 1 i’-'i'. ■i‘:dft:m i•M-m |,V« 5«? d.R-1A > ■( 5iif $ # 3',jS :!i;/ (>i*rpv*^w ........ k! r" P(^t) dSBIHAHCS HUMBER 64, SECOND SERIES imt-vdinG the municipal CODE OF ORONO BY LISTING THE lL^DE^WPTI^N OF A CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY RE20NED PROM RR-IB TO R-IA THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OROSO ORDAINS! section I. Th. IT.%"r^*c‘’t "bLnTrYet^?lt V-p:ftY\‘eV.ily <»..ctlbld .elow: •rh*^ oart of "a property located in the east half of the IS«hwest quactet o£ Section 34, Township IIS, Ranse 23, north , iq„«. That part lying north of a line dnwn<^*ll^£eeVsouth of and parallel with the north l"e e»st half of th. northwest quarter of Section 34. Section 2. This ordinance shall be Lak.r/PloS«r newspaper and shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City lOth V.y’'of°*0c?ob2?: Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 1 Y 1988. ATTl^ST: JameV R. Grabe'iCF''M4XO£ f/U42 Dbfothy M/fHallirT, City Clerk I- !■ . .* I .» l’*8*G kjt Ho OJ kj 00(0 s • • • • J/l Bonestroo ^^2 ROsene ^ m Andcflik & Associates Engineers ft ArcNtects 1 io«pt« C AndiB*<ft ^ Myen l lorMift n •KnjRff \<my Pt Giyv« • Cook ^ ThOfPIM f NOj«. « Myi G Pf lyun M tftytm C^A Comuftyt OctcAer 21, 1994 MMA A GiSiaon Af A| ik:hjna Whr Po«r Af OftMtfO LmM ^ ftaftyt C tuoyi # « a JFTPy A luyr Af Mem A MW Pf Mcfseei r ftMTv^nn rf K P««P Pf ft Anftffion AiA C ftmgiitfl Pf moyiy A Pf J IMyf Pf My^net Pf Pf AiCP ThOf*%« %I1BUM Pf C L^nd\ Pf iMift M«M Pf jyvy O Pf Steft i Aiyneft . Pf ftyvwhP Ar^ran Pf MMft Ml Pf Myt A. toy Pf Qyy W rnmm. Pf PIM J Gyvyn AlA oyw J fygMn Pf A aict MMLPf PNly J CftMO Pf Pf Pf IMO Mst I ftypnt Cyy O M«ft MikPf OftyfM J tTOft Pf O Gw#iba> Pi Cftcftft OMC Pi Pima Meyy. Pi jy«nP GMt Pt CAym A fMrftM mm PyeHiky Hyivs M OM Ms. Jeanae A. Mabusth, BuQding and Zoning Administrator City of Orooo Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 OCT 24 1994 r V C.vO Pro Tire & Exhaust File No 139-1975 Dear Jeanne, We have recently received comments from Mr. Glen Ellis at Mn/DOT regarding the proposed access to Highway 12 for Outlot E. He has indicated that as part of the Highway 12 safety improvement project scheduled for 1995, a curb cut to the lot would be provided, if approved by the City. The safety improvements will likely require additional right-of-way along the north side of Highway 12. Mn/DOT will determine the construction limits and approach the property owner if the existing right-of-way is not adequate. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. yiJtiMni X*. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. / jr -i 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 -WftLOW- ISL Tb 9 5i- TioTTi 90 90 • ■^*• 90 u* 8 s «e? 777715 y«.?i 8 »i or ’ s TAMA a ACK ave » :no 15 I 175 Inn] ................-.............*err±i 7n.fi5 e ^ 55.14 i 1/^ 5 «r. 55 uORlUtlALL AVE lol.Tfl 177577 lOM. e 5ft6 n -w+btow- r~ - -' ~«nr^ «r^ *« L i? y 11! ■» ' /x^-,r ,4*,s - ^ -_ ♦«•••______ - f • V4.0I ^ »«v*»9-r SJUlH 3r7.e 7S7.69 k ly.ii 3V .w NX 3 -^vt • ? « 5MAUGHNE5SY 8 JJL9L / . 118.45 I5D L# P 'll ...» S - »U> tj. *K> 1SI.4I 150 b Shaughn ;ssY cirb ar-CIR 8 3 183 II ifi 'Irr V i?i py NtillH 3077IM m »<«IM T'! F «- IT7.7Iiihr IM.54 5Q I M 3*^ At DM w. I M 8 f 771.67 •10 WI9C s TV n •••••••y ne ^ A ‘» — m.st 8 i — >1 iw I9». 17 VIRGINIA AVE 5C U TT SB u SB M SB 50 TO .OM lli iKE NN*J —o i *j •«P 5 ^£ ^Hu.^ I 2 « A1 •w 19 10 ■ ■a *0 X Tt1 \ Yi 50 1 TWT^X...;4 sW:<Av TM.n 454 r»'5o*?7*m 25 5.36 RES . 51.36 ^55 T7 t is: »67.77 -BR9WH nO -H VI 57 1170 I ■»4 UA? v?\«o n T ^ V ? 55 5? l-r-l^i i~rrn ZJOt. ftATMA/ y ^ •»y 5i 1 %T.*. ^ ..................iV'^ ' fry—Tsrn la K »«o*38’ari 15 , DOCNOJOS^i »\4? M7N (25)2 ■ $W41't kn«»ffl Y'f. el rr (W1L0T P (56) _____ m.n WAYZATA BLVD W__ R/n I"" I PAAOl Z42* I •.................IP '—•1 ____W.M toKii (24) 119.9 31*2n.}6 2 1 r. d(36)5 (») ?^ * i («) 80.01 I?8 i (?s) 143 I ^ (26) hvo T KIT |L SMEpfALpE 05) aj I . p.----------4. (JM » (56)ffi: 'in 3- Vi ('» 3!'"..r«.Tirnr TWr-^ / 21I.M C2T) ^ (26) s * 20^ T-nf” ^»(13) "N(Sj) (45) (30) { ! - IMDUgTKtAL fm} r ,PH o >*: H (M)' u5T PSl II^ (22) (55) % •.......IIO--H !PMT Cf }10’ 3 (56)I T8.g ^318.83 “****‘********^'^ .... Wl.SI -BBRWNGT8N- 2 6 ru ITDO -NORTHERN-H<R- (46) 7 ! «jg !s ‘A.^i" «7» ES 1:1." ^1, • .'tl • /-a • *' 1 • ‘ •1**’ h WKM « | v ,jI? 1 f.r''f* '♦’ .ft :j ^• -,:t•t,. i II ^ ^ v'.’r:1 1 CITY OF ORONO OL D |l * <9 <30 fl ^yvQ^Su OL E .iiUU.\l TTCU® M» FOR FUTURE WU lOACMIOR TO « DCTUMOCO IT dcocer . ~a :.1( ■ij Ml B6 COR b CORC :^'"Big cuAb *».■*' »!i. J!5w^ fe-U, i.;i LONO LAKE TRACTOR ANO eouipicht CITY OF LONG LAKE W • IHwbcrr ftjM« jo»>*(jV)ieb iz-r? t %P\nAGte-R^oDE r>l m:!pp:,L?l. :■ . ^iru rvu fjou s So O hH o “n o 33ozo To,Chair Schroeder and Orooo Planning Comm^sioo Members ron Moorse, City Administrator V flron:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building &. Zoning Administrator Date:January 9. 1995 Subject:#1990 Robert Carlson, 710 Gander Road - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Public Hearing Zoniiif District: RR-IB Area of property « 2 acres Plri f inent Ordinano* Section 10.12 - Vacation of Streets. Utilities, etc. Application: Applicant petitions for the vacation of a 35’ wide drainage and utility easement dedicated on the plat of Foxwood Second Addition. The Mctn^litan Waste Control Commission has released and terminated any interest in the original tower easement granted to the MWCC in April of 1975. List of Exhibits A > Application E - Property Owners’ List C - Plat Map D - MWCC Easement F - Recettt Termination of Sanitary Sewer Easement F - Plat of Foxwood Second Addition G > Staff Sketch of F.asements to Remain Once Vacation is Complefed Reykw of Request Applicant has filed a petition seeking the vacation of a 35’ wide drainage and utility easement dedicated in the plat of Foxwood Second Addition (approved in December of 1989). The surveyor for the subdivision advised applicant that the City Attorney for Orono required that the MWCC easement be shown on the plat as a drainage and utility easement. In reviewing the subdivision file, there b no reference as to the existence of the easement nor b there recordmg of any written discussion noting the existence of the easement. There is nothing in the exchanges between suff and the City Attorney that would have suggested conditioning approval on the casement being shown on the final plat. The easement certainly wouldn ’t have been designated as a drainage and utility easement Init rather as a utility easement with the document number of the easement recorded on the plat. Review Exhibits B and E, the MWCC has released all interest in the easement. The original release agreement was sent to the law firm of Fredrikson & Byron for filing against the Chain of Title of the property. It is not clear whether this has been completed by either the applicant or the current owner. The City sees no public interest being served by the existence of the easement. We recommend that the 35’ drainage and utility easement be vacated and that easements be retained as shown on the staff sketch. Exhibit G. Applicant should advbe if the document releasing the easement by the MWCC has been filed. U n lUt cnr or orono - central lant > u # PROFERTY LOCATION fir I Site Addxws ~7/Q N.^ (F.I.d 7^a , «y w APPUCANT « , ^ r Name Co^U Phone (home)■'■■■ yra i jp ■" mxw " Pho« (work) 3 C^tUe.Zip ""S^lggggsg^r DajitPr I (do) Csm-h-t A.T„r.d //->/-^^---------- ^ also owa the adjacent parcels of land. (ffionth/'year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - . ^ ,. ^ . S 50.(X) For each variance requMt with CUP ^phc*:iion S125 .(X) Residential Accessory Use S200.00 Instimtional (church, schoc^ etc.) ” S175.00 Guest House'Guest Apartments ” $150.(X) Duplex Credit/Bldg ” $250.(X) Commercial'Industrial Use " $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling -101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall. .< lining walls within 73’ of lakcsbore CITY CF OFQf^O l^iyAKE OFFICE 1 jSOCCOOOO VI 175 .- Cf€CK TL 1 75. htCEiFT’lHMK YOU fijC2y4v COdl .sOl h PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule . • n $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from origu^ application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee i OTHER APPLICATIONS , . r n _____$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant tees) $250.00 Vacation- /-75‘S/il75j50'^5Easement Vacation 'j^:00"Eisement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD > refer fo fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Vy/CiCC4«%t' Other (specify). ........... • ••'4 required submittals I • CoDQpieied Applkation Fonn. ?• p^^*OwaK5 List oibwneri within 350’ (youcanobtolnthis list from 3. Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Ceoier. 348-3271). 4^ 'Plat Map' ■ - •' €^(cT<'V.< ^—T ccitificate of Survey (signed by^a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey ■ ' information. • , . . •_■ A ' ot ' Attach letal description to application if not included on mquutd survey. 7! Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours). |f la^. alterations Involve chances in elevation (grades). « ^ List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest m the '■" propetty This would telude of ipplic»iit(5) if.iiot cuirem owner(s). o,-' >>' Commctionplan. if ippIic3ble(s«safffor.requireme^^^ IQ an addendum to this application please anach a separate ta of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ vniT ARE required to SLTPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11 ” X 17 ’ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMEN^ SUBMITTED. (Staff wUl requiie to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submined.) The Applicant and Pioperty Owt.c, must sign this applicati^. Ple« remember that your applica^n is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. CeitificaUon by Oerical Department that Land Use AppUc*<ion is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:________________________ provide all infonnation mquired or requested by the Zonlt« ^'^onal lees time ^ co«t^Xn^fJ^rSn and/or unusual expenses incurredjpmv^ew of^^^^pplicauon. and certifi supplied is true and correct to tlie best of h^r knowledge. Applicant’ssignamre ^ Owner’s signature f ------------------- App.icant must have all subminals into the City offices M days hefoie CoLission Meetings are held on the third Mond.sy of each °»nih review meetings of me Planning Commission and Council. I an t «jvise the Building & Zoning Office plea make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and anvise of this change prior to the meeting. i^~ -^^u\9^iir-a M mosK MM W M«7S r«C ST ^amui Him. f -'P j suxuh ait ciuictM TaxPAvia .^ mc« slocuh a taiM cxLLXcaN ---------------. tars fm st -MYzaT* m sssn Igtag ypt COUNTT MOWMTT INFQW«ni0l;kty «m«ss asT A v» •» ■ ( . rrii- 'V n • ■•:>. 1 -.r. ,. - — oa-iir-as as oois ‘^ ;i-MOO aoMi#“ tars#' naxNit »# oMco H»m ^ Ham o fom a raurr-stuuiT rm TaXOaYf 0 .%> MMK « FOK V' MOC/AOM ^ X7S0 RAINCY 00 OiVi . %• MYZATa »•< sssn ■ MOO um ^ >• so 00>U7*ZS as 0019 OOOSO aOOOESS unmsioco OAZNiV mmim aNocosoH OAXICY HANKaO AFSEOSaN o Mai«/aOM ISO OMOVCLANO TIO'V.i'T ... ■ • ^ j5^3 Vi TJ09AYI0 U/>' & ♦ <. . . - !.•■, j :v » ■ V. iipu iti r •F > . •;■ tfi nsm Aoofi V QMHIII MMC ^ TA)9mii w V Hniij/ilOQH “A .. • : ^ ‘ I . ’ *»* -r SO oa>ii7>2S as oozz OOOSO AOOOiSS UNASS16NI0 ocioas F RUHLIN Deltas F RUHUN 00 aox 055 MAYZATA 104 SSS91 . V.-.*" r •.'n u ■ . so -oa-U7-2S aa ooos ^ '0000 AOM ; : 00710 6AN0C0 00 . t I OMCO NAM ‘ 0 0 N a CO L .TANOAYIO-. .'OOOCOT A ANOCltA CARLSON , >t NAM/AOM . ass LAREVXEH AVI . V ioNB uMce m ssssa :-;0' * 9'* ;• ^ * ' ♦ '• v ‘> ? ^ '> '* 'y X, .,0. • - . !k ^ ^ ' V. i: " ' ■ f * y- •' . , {7* ^ • ,4 • - . > » ,:4i. •ti« »»»»r •I •*.* .»tJt -A • ^oa-117-is as ooot- *»- ’t*soozazs fok st a a i orriosaM OAVXO I OITI zazs for stout MAYZATA MM S5S9L A' -r ^ i ♦.^ > • '? lO a. •!!??» 1 »t> •a'v ’v > I * » 4l ^o«Mi iAnrr m ^ ft S i S S VXCMftMl ^ ft SCOTT VXCUftniN ^ SUftftil S VlCUftMM 2MS ftAIICt ftS MYCATA m SU9I so oa-u7>zs as oolo 0ZA9O OAXNiV 00 n M SHXTN act SMITN n N SHXTO act sraTO zaao RAXMY 00 NAYZATA FM SSS91 otassaes ' •t' ■.t'.. - T. •■ ‘ , f \ 4 ^ J» •♦'%.'A» 9 *y< I • ; « 4 oa-U7-ts as ooio aaooiss iMASSiONet OAXNiY oa ioiaw af «oson OAXNIY OaFOO M RFMOSON ISO OOVIUFM TIO \ 1 a % • o * •vr a • 50 oa-117-zs as oozt OOaSO CANDIO 00 J N S eOUXTXCS INC j H s eouxms xnc aooa OAOR olin oo HOLS HN ssaia ■ I If';it’ ■ V. M« .O •4**. - » • *■ r.- ’ ’*•' ■.VV 4..' SO oa-ii7>ts as ooti W7S0 ' OINOeO 00 C R OaOMVILT/V 0 OOOOtVlLT C K OOOSeVILT/V 0 OOOKVILT zaas FOR ST NAYZATA m . BSS9I >1 I '• =t1= ♦. ' :• • • a V • so oa-ii7-zs aa oooz OOOSO AOOUSS UNASSXONIO 0 I eCRIRLXNI/N A ICRIOUNi .i OITEO I ECREOLlNi Z555 FOR ST / OOONO FM S5S91 . • . Jr » •.» ■ • ’ a \* "V V - ^ • cl r •k'V ♦ • ■ s, ■ ■ 7T-'-C'.’'' ,w‘.t SO M-I17-ZS aa OZaOI OAZMY 00 OAIMT NAMiaM aNOeOSON - RAXMY NANNAN ANOlOSaN' ISO COOVILAND TER . ’ HOLS FM ssats - ; ' Y • TOTAL OATCN * ^ *\ ■ *. a-.*’ * I « . • .'• A ' ■ •• - '■•-■* *. • *•'• ' ’■ • ► - t- Z'/ *4 •. I ' A ki.H' ■ ■ ». ■' ■• ■■ m ooois ‘ ry .'• ■ ' A rlbt^ 4 V yJ V *Ji 't ;4 . * HEmCPlM COMTY MOKITT XNTOIMITnH tVSTtH MIOKRTY OMCRS UST . vy': Prilv • nr • •’— *’ * • '«. • •» ’-i t ’ *»-;■ '’a* 7..' ••'-^ i ■’i; - • .. V <• . i,7..v-.i.-^h:.^ .;-;i,..>'^^^^^ ........ ■" • * k.- ’ *• * • '. > *. : 4 n '.,* , .• • • • rim . *• ••■ ‘* '■ •’' ^"^*■■•’l•U-"^'i'^'Vi U^'^.4 v;'* '•'* •'/ • /Cl *■.•■' •* .♦• » .n*- ‘iv"'i.ir ■ f tf ■» * ' • .•. ■; “■. . * > r.* -Vv .'^ViV--- * . • rv J '. 'V-_ ■;: *.' . . • •^- ^^•^f vVr:yr- . zS3i^ , ■ ' ^ .«* :r A *" • •. » * •/ ^ ' ‘..t H X CCRTIFY THAT TMt FACTS KRKStNnO ARI AN ACCIMATC AW TWil RCmSENTATION OF INFORNATION AS XT AFFfARS TNXS OATS ON TMI RtCORM OF THi HENNIPXN COUNTY OfFARTmNT OP PNOPtRTY TAKAHON* TO TNC KST OF MV KNOMCIOOI AW tfLXEF.< . -■ •’';.‘:itt./— ' •,• ^ :. O 7 ";■ -iif Vi' ^ 'a * . ♦ • • ‘ ■ » ‘ * - ■ * » t «^- . a ♦•. .» .* 'j»* 1 . •' »• ♦ F ^* • N \;4 .« », ••>. •» V ■ ■:r.^ . 'vA ,•r• *• ^.x *4* % » « * •t ■ ■ :•'■•.■■»» . *• « \ r wr 4 ra iiab^ : ir-r^Hr:rr, t!i<s ^,•>' '•T". •• betwe#»r r**ont% **. •'i^t n .%n<» !» » p, hun- • an%: %T\(^ wife, of th^ rcjnt^* rU'^ntrir .%n I ••f'ltc* o'* Vs, n^rti.-n .%f th« first par-, aiwl thr .rT>^>L ^nr^rlv tb# v**trc»pnntan 5t<*w#*r Pcv%r<*. ^ ‘mI'* conatltutod .%r,rn^ ‘ of tb#^ f'etrofv^l 11 \n Couiicil created oroanized u'lrsuant tc ••inneaota Laws Chapter of rn^ second xiTVrssrn?, That the said partii * the flr*«t ;>%rt. li: consiiicrat ion o£ One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration to then in hand paid by the laid party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acK^nen^ledged. do hereby Grant. Bargain. Sell. Convey and Warrant to said party of the second part, the easements situate in Hennepin County. HinnesoCs. described as folloars. to*viti A 3S foot perpetual easeamt and a 100 foot temporary constmetiom easement for sanitary sswer purposes over, under snd across the following described propectyi V tot 11. Auditors Subdivision Mo. 329. sccording to ths records ^ on file and of record in the office of the Begiatsr of Deeds. \ Hennepin County, mianesota. raid perpetual easement being I7.S feet on each side of the follwing described line, and said tisfinrary eomatruction ssssmemt being SO.O feet on each side of said folloidlng described line. Said lime is described as folioitsi Ccnnencing at the Mortheast comer of the Southeast Quarter of Section 4. Tomsbip 117. Hangs 23i thence soutA on an asswed bearing of South 0 degrees. 17 adnutss. 55 ssconda Bast along the East line of said Southeast Quarter s distance of 40S.64 fuetx thanes Sjuth t7 degrees. 10 minutss. OS seconds We»t 406.43 fsetf thence South 53 degrees. 02 minutss. IS seconds West 648.22 fsetf thence Sooth 2 degrees. 50 minutss. 37 seconds East 603.21 festf thanes Worth 09 degress. 14 adnutas. 00 seconds Mast 91.*70 festi thanes South 25 degress. 53 minutss. 20 sscondn Wsst 200.00 fsstf thanes continus South 25 degrsea. S3 minutes. 30 seconds West 123.44 fasti thence South 13 degrees. 44 minutss. 30 seconds West 330.04 fasti thanes South 7 dsgrses. 16 minutss. 15 seconds East 305.21 fast and thsre terminating. Said temporary construction essoment asDire^ Oecw«d>sr 31. 1976. TMs csQveysscs is sssmpt Eras Stats Dess Tan pursuant to msa 207.22 Doc. No. 1138926 Filed 5-T-75 X . * A 1:; TrSTIMOt:V vntrRr^**. thr of the part hove ‘‘.oreutito 3ot their hands the dav and vear first above written. In rre*;«»?u*i* >f: K.U i • -u L {nia Kiimlin ^Dennis STA7r or MlrJNESOTA ) ) S3. COuNTY OF lIF.MHF.PItJ ) On this day of A^^rU , 1975, bcforo -*c, » N’otnry Pia>.ie, within and for said County, personally eppoared Dennis f. Kusilin and Barbara B. Kurlln, husband and wife, to we known to be the persons described in and who executed the Corepolnfl instxuaeot and acknowledged that tl»ey executed the ■we as their free ect esd deed. UJ t Notary Public TH^- INSTRUMENT HRS DRATTED lY Robert A. Hlllstron 1710 Soo LIm Bldg. KlnneapollSp Minnesota 55402 gsa^gaSaia, Mb*, itte •vw ‘,r . .. • s*r.> 5 RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that th« undarsigned, successor in intareat to tha Matropolitan Waste Control CottBission, being the holder and owner of an easanant dated April 10, 1975 and raeorded Kay 7, 1975 as Document No. 1138926 in the office of the Registrar of Titles, in and for Kannepln County, Minnaaota, covering the praaisas lying and being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which premises are described as Lot 2, Block 1, FoNwood second Addition, according to the records on file and of record in tha office of tha Raglster of Dsads, Hennepin County, Minnesota, in censidarstion of tha sun of one Doller and other good and valuable consideration to It in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby releasee and terminates that certain easement as described below between the owners of eeld property and tha Metropolitan waste Control Commission, a duly constituted agency of the Metropolitan Council created and organized pursuant to Minnssota Laws 1975, Chapter 13, Minnesota Statutes $473,503, to wit: Lot 2, Block 1, Foxvood second Addition was prsviously part of Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229 upon which the following casement was acquired by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Description of Easement; • perpe^i^^ JM Jpot temporary eenstmoUon ,% Hennepin co«ntyVit5j>twu.-.( T^ « . • I ^6f>8n|'beitwg-27>8')gee,t os oteh side ef the teilowiagI doseribed and said tempgrasy pmtreetien eaaeMnt^bfing 88«o ! f • • jsjiris'.rsis.s' 08 pepende West I02.2X fpeti ____ 91.70 rebti^.^'oi200.00* deetfTSane eocondar West'123; i<sSo;30 peeonde Wett 5g^ df Winttssf' Id seoo^i.Hsst 19 seooeds psat .^09!!rfeet%M*'thoro^teraiAatln9 tgrees* 44 sdnuutr Moreet, II mlnutfSi natlna. ». Said tei^rary construction esBament expirsa Oae«nb«r 31, 1974 Thia coovnMOs 1? 4i^t free ItaU Deed Tax pursuant to MSA 247.a* JAN- 4-S5 WED 9:29 ttCHS ENG/CONST FAX NO. (oUu^ai^o I • VM IN WITNESS HHEESOP, ths undersigned has caused/^ChlB agreement to be duly executed this day of . /TfMnA*/ APPROVED AS TO FORK; Metropolitan councilr a public corporation and political BUbdiviaion of the State, Successor to^he Ketropo^itan Waste control Conalsslon Its General Manager IsSifUmCorm ae STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } flS • COUNTY OF on tb« d«y of _ & notary public within and^or said County, personally appMbad_^ foregoing instruaent, and that said Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political BUbdiviaion of the State, suooeesor to the Metropolitan Waate control conuniesion, by authority of its Board of Conuniaaionere and said Board of Coatmiasloners aeknovladged said instrunent to be the free act and daed of said Metropolitan Council. a ‘ ............................................................................................................ ary Pub %•• ***•»• & - V, ANNEMAJETICH EisbM ria 11 iM Jeanna K. Matrons, Ll^hse No. 68615 Metropolitan Council/Wastevater Services - (612) 229**2108 230 East Fifth Street Hears Park Centre St. Paul, MJ? 55105 ( /3*7-7C97j r r OL-VyVyiMLy MUUI I •200 FEET UMENT 7sa<J ofien on ossomac^ dafom Dfalnacft f uf'lify eastmenis ahenn ^h»s:p _2j_____________________________________ 0'-', ^ V I # V o: ‘ /')<Jio i V,..-. ‘V fH i L I COUNTY, MINNESOTA Minnesota Laws of 1969, this plat has been approved this day of . 19 DERNARD H. LARSON. HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYOR » lEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I within plat of KOXHOOD SECOND ADDITION was filed for record in this office this . H. day of R. DAN CARLSON, REGISTRAR OF TITLES » »OL-VxVyiMU MUUI I ^aa ■I FEET UMENT 7«aV on atzumtJ dofi/m T}i'ama<jt f vhUfy caaemenii ahom fhai: 4L> ____bk_..„k__ V,.™: <\ O' (3:) •pH , S CO iieftn ¥tidfh and odlolntoo M imti, Qod * Se//7Q iO>CO/isef in Midfft (Utd QQ/o/ilffta block, lines '. vnfess oUerwdt Micohoi oir fUt plit^ sO N • r.. CD c•#o t'i 1 V c: '•J.//’^ to VO n*p VvS * O / \Q " ~ o cr ,v T> L- I.. I n J. J ♦ I COUNTY, MINNESOTA Minnesota Laws of 1969, this plat has been approved this_ _ _day of . 19 . OERNARO li,. LARSON, HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYOR »,_j_ _ _ _ _ _^ . lEPIN COUNTY, .MINNESOTA ------------ ■ within plat of FOXHOOD SECOND ADDITION was filed for record in this office this day of •ck • H, ~ R. OAN CARLSON, I^GISTRAR OF TITLES % I i V To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 9, 1995 /^1981 Todd R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Total area of property = 20,900 s.f. Review of Amended Proposal Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (B) - Non-encroachment ... terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level are considered non-encroachments and may extend into required yard areas. Refer to Exhibits B and D, grade or ground level patio may extend within street yard but may not encroach a bluff setback area. Section 10.22, Subdivision 5 (A) - Street setback variance for amended proposal. Required = 35’ Original proposal = 25’ , j j Amended proposal = 25’ A. Setback from existing traveled road = 46 B. Setback from upgraded 28 ’ road = 42 C. Setback from 10’ grassed boulevard of upgraded road = 32’ List of Exhibits A - Original Front and Rear Elevations B - Revised Site Plan C - Revised Front Elevation D - Footprint of House E - First/Ground Floor Plan F - Second Floor Plan G - Hardcover H - Survey Locating Travelled Road I - Gustafson Report 1/9/95 / . I J Zoning File #1981 January 9, 1995 Page 2 Status of Application At the November 21st meeting of the Planning Commission, the three members in attendance advised applicant to request tabling application until the January meeting providing applicant additional time to develop an amended plan that would address the following concerns of the members: 1. Need to reduce the footprint of residence noting that three-car garage appeared excessive. 2. Members preferred a street setback variance rather than encroachment of the bluff areas of the property . Members did not specifically specify how much of a street setback variance would be acceptable. They also encouraged applicant to relocate decks and staircases out of the bluff area and bluff impact zones (30’ from top of bluff). Review of Revised Plan Applicant has reduced footprint of residence to approximately 30’ x 60 ’. The attached garage has been reduced from 3 to 2 stalls and has been relocated to the west side of the residence. The principal .and accessory struchires will be located out of the bluff impact zone and the principal structure will be located 25’ from the street lot line. The structure will be located 46 ’ from the existing travelled road. Review Exhibit I, Gustafson notes in his report that if Tonkaview Road is upgraded, it will be installed as an urban section at a 28’ width measured to the inside of the curb with 10’ grassed boulevard areas. The proposed struchire will be located 42’ from the improved road and 32’ from the grassed boulevard area (refer to Exhibit H). In his report, Gustafson goes on to ask that upon application for a building permit the applicant provide detailed grading and drainage plans for his review. He also notes ^t there may be retaining walls along the north property lines because of the steep topographies. The Engineer ’s report does not note the need to redirect drainage from roof away from the steep bank elevations. Staff suggests that all or the majority of roof drainage be directed towards the roadway. Applicant ’s building plans must provide information on how roof drainage is to be directed towards road and away from the north and east lot lines. Issues for Consideration 1 Has applicant addressed the concerns of the three-member Planning Commission? Zoning FUe #1981 January 9, 1995 Page 3 2. 3. Do members have any questions concerning Section 10.03, Subd. 15 (B) that would allow applicant to extend a ground level patio into street yard area? The patio may be extended as long as it docs not encroach into the bluff impact zone. Non-encroachments may extend into required yard areas but not required setback areas (i.e lakeshore setbacks, average lakeshore setbacks, bluff setbacks). Does this proposal for development appear feasible for the property? Is it too ambitious or excessive? Note hardcover is at 16.8% where 35% would be allowed. Options of Action To deny revised proposal seeking a 10 ’ street setback variance. Approval of the revised application as proposed, subject to the following conditions: 1. 3. 4. Applicant to provide a detailed grading and drainage plan for City Engineer ’s review upon application for building permit. 2. Roof plans for house shall address need for roof drainage to be directed away from the north and east sides of residence. Because of the 4-6 ’ high embankment at the northwest comer, the Engineer asks that lot grading be extended into the right-of-way so that retaining walls and tree removal will be minimized. The City will not allow encroachment of the bluff impact areas of accessory stmctures or improvements such a decks or staircases. 'I )i o i-i > o 01 fXI VD k m s> 00 *n r in • • CPcn CM • • • • • • •0■ \ • . • w. !JUte ynonu ■■■1 BM ' • • V * i'llrtin 111 •' ; 1 f ) f\fkriof^10CIS zloLiRMC/A testcAtx ai'. uotauc. be&i&ij .*•..•• • • •• • n§ !S ji O M > 0 M 1 t- IM r^ •H D O OD CM m • • <n CP / • • I • • \ % 0 tr n □a • 1 .__1 «-4 * ^AitLLVAnSN} / 30 TODD COURNEYAOF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. LH««BMAN ADDITION* HENNEPIN COuirrV, MINNESOTA . i : §1 mWTitAifiorvi'feCUi P } f>J ■•H U) cncn cn •H J i • 0 1 •J i •I I I { ! ■1. .1• • • •I«• • • •;:i!ill. ;r *; r•II‘..I • • « *I * • • • • .il.j * i iI M i'!;*!I • *» I I :i!ii!i'< • ♦ • r •. rrtt ;n m:' ill* DrtTiyeWffy f • 1 4 1 .. 4 • 1 • 4 • * •• • •• • • •• • • * • • -• • • •• • ••• •^ • • • 4 1 i • • * *• • • •* 4 • « » 4 . !i ..I ^ 1-«. ;:j 4 4 1 i; I * illi!.:a MI I!;i! *«iillli!!l• iji ilH ■::l u • •It ll!l l!!i • •' t Jl ;i .1 nil ;i ii !i i!!* ii«111ll;i111;I'M :ii: III «!!! iiiiII! •Ill •If 11 M liil i!ii 111! Ml ♦ !li! :iii Mi: • 11 • • I ^ J • : : ;i I •»*. * nil ill! ill l!n •ill• •« ;il !l!i iiii ti:* ti!: iii- ill !ln Hi li t I I I • .iU;n Hi III i!l iiil ii! '!• ..;i .ii •. i‘ • • ill i • • • • . I tli! rt- :!ti i 11* j » I I 1 I*« • * !i: I I « Mi: it! •i! lii*• • • • • * «t Hi! .li; i! it: i:;. • ♦ it! .i; ii il. i I 4 tr • % Hi ■li I!i'l•It• Mtillili.!iJIt il1 «1 i4U :t li !1 • I *!l! ti; Miiiii’li|: ti; til 1! ti!il! 11 r!». *»i!‘iII1# ••Hii1..-Illli 4 tI ■ Il.>lilt 4 I * * • • 1.1. iti! .!•; « 4 : I u ; t iJi li'.i < • 11 !!!• • * * t i : I .’.il i!ii: 11 I!! 111i.i(• I (< i I t • I, * i •.111!"!• Ill; 4 , 4.4* ili! .. t ti! .Ill ■11' Hi ♦ 4 • i.i »•• If; • • 4 ;i 4 !.i: til ti; i;: iii. Iii; 4 • • 4n: t • * Iii. i‘“ !II 4 Ii: til ;;) ♦ I Ilf :i. Ill • 4 • 4 isII!' 4 4 4 Ji: 4^4 ;;i ‘i‘11 • M * • •:: II • •.4 t .»• * .*1 • I I i. ill! • • • 4 4# lii: III 4 •ir j .1 I . • ^ • ‘ i* I •• •44. 1♦• • • •. 4 •4 tt!.; * ^ *...• 4 • •4 •.1• •I' « 1 •• 4 44 4 4 f 4 • • »4 t • ‘ ■ 1 • • • • . • 4 « • I 4 1 . • • 4 • • 1 « • 1 4 4 I ili: i. *. I. !!: I .1 i: *« • • • 11.. [ I , •Jli ii*. • * I ■ ..a 4 *1 I • ' . 4 .1 . .ai 'll. ■ 4 . 4 • • « •li. : ,f• • * :Ji. 4* * < ‘•1 .J .Hi I bl«K h»rf- . i ) I F/nro IS' I I • •CM • o ca\yRi^A u. I I SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* EXISTP?^>n HABP aI House ''V__ hardcover calculation worksheet 75-250’ 25-500’ •• •• ••• « • 500-1000’ B. Cange C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other / total hardcover in zone ■OTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ B A _____________ xlOO ppnPQSED HARDCOyFR IN A. House _ ^----------- 30 Leafch Widch B. Garage C. Driveway za D. Sidewalk *LCs E. Pado/Deck p. Landscape Underlain By Plastic ) eo X X G. Other /'l.oo y»e ■zio TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property are .^ in zone a T.^ .yoo B 1.o9o^ XlOO S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. .• • S.F. ___S.F. 7^-ft —^ A B A B .* . I/I Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& Associates Engineer! ft Architects Januar/ 9. 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 533^3 Re: Couriieya Residence File No. 139-1981 ecrestroa me ntn Acra^eo^ Opperjr^ QT^ G aoremee ocL-et 'A' Aotert PS • .etfcp C PS Me vv-* * y3-v#t# #5 4.Q-*tC e Tb»r--- Pi Cterr R Cczt r»'c-"ei e Noti •! tree^ 0 Scr^-C'L •f- y^\4n M C PA •Sen-c* Cs 'sotJhf Ho^a^a A *E te-tr A Co^sor PC PW^’*f Pi tChj-3 W fCia* Pf ca%-9 o Lm«ota PS MenC PwiK«. A;a jff*y A icu^cn. ®C Mere A Mihior' Pf MCPJfi ” Pavx.'herr' »S TtQ ft PICO. PC Thor^ji f Ansirian A i A OcoftJ C Ou'^irot PS T»*0*"ll A Sfto PS PTCC'X . UrrffOi^, Pi «xjc« Vert'^ec. VCAftf* • Bau Pi A^rtt V «ir^ A'C» ’PCfras w. fttf'ich *5 v«c»'ee» C ITK*'. P« ■ Veuro Pi C. AH-JICP. •§ ksn j A*9ar»e PS K«nrr.h P. Ardnor. P| « ibA PS ftiam A. Sc^. PI 047 ^ WCPt*' P^ pev .* AI A. ^4r«« J £c9Tisn P5 A Ilk kPrtft Pfe PTi 3 CatAP< •? J?: Ma«t D Nftftkk Pf Men B jf-’ie-i PS L ppi-g Q'avf. Pf *«««« L Pfe 017 a ftiitx* (ft PC Mir ft tftCft PL OoucMs J fr-ct. Pf Jh#fer«-! 0 CMtU%pr% PS CKku Owr* PC Pilft Q Hf jr PC ;ohn P Oar?- PS CAerviA Cfrkidr LWM "dhfifflky nr»e'' V O'eo'' Dear Jeanne, We hive reviewed the sketch plan submitted by Todd Courneya for ** P™P«“^ "’if on Lot 1. Block 1, Lemmennan Addition. The location of the house pa on e pp acceptable from an engineering standpoint. Prior to issuing a building permit, a grading plan should be prepared showing the contows Sng elevatfoL and driveway location. Due to 4e steep t^opaphy along the along the north property line, it appears that a retaining wall may be needed. In the future Tonka View Une will most likely be upgraded to a 28-foot mde \ 0-?oot wide boulevards. The northwesterly comer of this 1« has a 4 to 6-toot emba^ iiolg the roadway. The lot grading should be extended »“ ** retaining walls and tree removal to construct the roadway will not be nearly as Ukeiy Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK &■ ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson. P E. C> OlMl ’'.mi To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 11, 1995 #1986 David Yorks, 2825 Casco Point Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Total lot area = 14,835 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Replacement of lakeshore retaining wall requires conditional use permit. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Setback variance for retaining wall. 4. Required Existing Proposed Variance = 75’ = 25’ + = 25’ + = 50’ 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 5,100 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 260 s.f. or 5.1% No change in hardcover proposed. 75-250’ setback area = 9,735 s.f. Allowed = 2,434 s.f. or 25% Existing = 4,209 s.f. or 43.2% No change is proposed in this setback area, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - No land alterations are permitted within the lakeshore protected area. The retaining wall is located approximately 25’ from the shorelme ot Lake Minnetonka. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Mabusth Letter 11/22/94 C - Gustafson Letter 11/17/94 Zoning File ^1896 January 11, 1995 Page 2 D - E - F - G - H - I - J - Gustafson Letter 1/11/95 Allan Block Corporation Letter 11/15/94 Elevations, Section, Plan Large Scale Section/Plan Location Map Property Owners ’ List Survey Review of Application In November of 1994, Mrs. Yorks contacted the City to advise of the unstable condition of an existing retaining wall at the top of the steep lakeshore bank at her property. She was advised by her contractor of the need to replace existing retaining wall prior to the spring thaw and rains. Mrs. Yorks was advised that there were no future meetings of the Planning Commission for ’94 and that the first meeting of the year in 1995 would not be until January when it would be impossible for the contractor to proceed with retaining wall replacement. Staff advised that the City Engineer would make an inspection of her lakeshore yard to determine if there was a potential for serious collapse of the lakeshore bank based on the condition of the wall. Upon the City Engineer ’s inspection of the Yorks ’ property, he determined that there was indeed a great potential for the collapse of both wall and the steep bank. Mrs. Yorks was then advised that the City could issue no building permits until a conditional use permit review was completed, but that if she had to proceed that it would be advisable that she submit a conditional use permit application and provide all the necessary information for the Engineer to complete his review of the new construction. Gustafson approved the final specs and plans submitted by the Allan Block Corporation, review Exhibits C, E, F and G. Applicant was advised of the need to first complete the filing of a conditional use permit application and to also await the final review comments of the City Engineer before construction of the wall could begin. The wall was constructed sometime in late November or early December. Unfortunately, the contractor failed to ask for inspections of the project zs it was being installed. The Engineer recommended that if the wall was to be installed at a height greater than 4 ’, additional layers and depth of geo-grid were to be used. The Engineer also notes in his letter of January 11th, Exhibit D, the following should have been implemented: 1. Bond beam or bridged construction in front of existing trees. 2. Granular backfill in the bridged areas. 3. 14 inches of buried block (18 inches required at increased height) Gustafson contacted the contractor who advised he was not aware that he had to call for the inspections but noted that photos were taken during the construction of the walls and that to his knowledge, based on field notes, that all of the requirements set forth in the City Engineer ’s review were carried out. As Gustafson has no way of confirming that these were achieved, he Zoning File #1896 January 11, 1995 Page 3 advises that the City should require a written statement from contractor confirming that all of these had been completed as a result of the increase in height. The Building staff confirms that the contractor did provide the required erosion control during construction. It was observed from another property when completing another inspection. The Building staff was not involved in the inspection of the retaining walls as building permits were not issued nor do they routinely complete such inspections when the Engineer completes the strucniral/engineering review. The City Engineer will complete inspection involving land alterations proposed under a conditional use permit. Upon your inspection you will note that the landscaping beneath the steep banks of this wall have been protected. The wall, although close to 7’ in height at the western edge, will not be observed because of the plantings within the steep bank and also the color of the stone used is neutral gray. Staff would caution members that if you proceed to step down the stairs to observe the wall at the base to be most cautious as the steps were slippery and difficult to descend because of the storage of portioas of dock on stair structure. Issues for Consideration 1.Staff is placed smack in the middle (or our Mayor Butler would say " between a rock and a hard place") when dealing with emergency siuiations in the late fall of the year such as in this case. There is no way to provide the necessary land use review to meet the winter deadline. If this applicant was delayed to the end of January, there would be no way to ensure against the collapse of the wall and bank this spring. Staff could have advised the person to proceed on their own and deal with the penalties as they come but we feel it imperative that the City Engineer provide his review and guidance for the reconstruction of walls where there is potential for a serious collapse which was the c^ for this property. How would the Planning Commission advise staff to proceed with these matters? 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Planning Commission Recommendation Your recommendation to approve must include the following conditions required by staff. 1. 2. Applicant ’s contractor to submit for both City and applicant a letter confirming that all additional improvements as set forth by the City Engineer in his report of January 11, 1995 have been fulfilled as a result of the increase in height of the retaining wall that is in excess of a height of 4 ’. Applicant to obtain a building permit (and to make payment of a penalty fee?) to cover the additional costs for the inspections of the City Engineer. Zoning FUe #1896 January 11, 1995 Page 4 3. Others resommended of Commission Members. crry of orono - general land us /appu J ---------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Mame ___________________ Phone (home)___4l21llL4£- Phone (work)___4fILll2Qin— -Zip Phone (homeX Phone (workX Name Address raES - CONWTON^ J.UP ,ppU„rion --------S125.00 Residential Accessory Use --------$200.00 Institutional (church, sc ^ ’ * --------5175 00 Guest House/Guest Apartmen = SS^c«SSSai use ^ staining walls within 75' of lakeshore ______ PRD/PID - see original application)=sr^4“A'S» ««-«.«" OTHER APPLICWIO^ercial Review (+ co^Utant fees) $250.00 Vacation = "vS-WithSuhdivisi^ - 5300.00 Reaoning (PUD - refer to f«$300.00 Rezomng " S300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendme ' $100 00 Appeals " Other - see Fee Schedule Present Present Use of Property Other (specifyX (month/year) ^•TT*V* *‘*T ^ill I w» Wi»eiiuf FltrANiE OFFICi- 1 3502000CO Oi tin IL 2l\ 2iXcmRECEIFT-JH^ ^ H319760 cool aul ^ 11- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. -----Certified ^rty Owners List of owners within 350’ (you can obtain this iist from W/n tfiXlP- -------Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govemmera Center, 348-3271) Plat Map. ^ Will —. mformauon. r ~ 6.^____Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey -------Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 8- -------List of the legal names (include marital sams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 9. ____ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 10- -------As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR ^PRODUCTION (ll * X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information h^ not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:^______________ Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correcj/^oThe best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowled^bs^d agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes ofiifivMtigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature "Date AppIicMt must have all submittali^to^ City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held onlbcihird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Tnning Office of this change prior to the meeting. //o '] -1 ’' '1 >N •'/ November 22, 1994 \\ CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Mr. and Mrs. David J. Yorks 2825 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Restoration of Retaining Wall Within Lakeshore Yard Dear Mr. and Mrs. Yorks; I have enclosed a copy of the most recent report of the City Engineer concerning the engineering d^gn for the replacement of the retaining wall in your lakeshore yard. Mr. Gustafson has ,nLLed the most recently amended plan dated October 30, 1994 including detail of elevation r cr^t secrn plusttrfrom Don Gordhaner of Allen Block Retaining Walls dated November 15, 1994. As we discussed in earlier conversations, there are no further meetings of Ae Pla^g rnmmission this vear The City Engineer has confirmed that there is an immediate need to nr“rm the'e^^^^ wall. You have agreed to file a condidonal use permit/variance application before your contractor can begin the . /pjf Sse application has been filed with the City and wiU be presented before the Planmng Commission on Tuesday, January 17, 1995. Please contact my office if you have any further questions concerning this matter. Sincerely. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building <fe Zoning Administrator JAM/Isv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 % «• * Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects November 17, 1994 Bonesaoa ftosene. AnoefttksnaAssocucn, inc. Oro G BonrstfOQ PE RdOert W ftoitne. PE • xneo^ C An(jeh< PS Mjrvvi L ScrwM. PE Rcrwa E Turner. PE Glenn R CooK PE T« omas E W yev PE AoDen G tr.nu' xht, PE Sutjn M Eoertin. C PA •Senof Consutant Howvjid A SanM. PE Aeen A. Gcxdon. PE AooeR P PKiriffie. PE Ibcnaid W Foster. P£ Oavio O Loshou. PE. fiooen C Putse*. AJA. Jerry A Bomeon. PE Mart A Harnon. P* Mchaei T Pautmann. PE ThJ IC F<id PE Thomas P Annerson. AIA Oonak) C »uJ9a»rr». .*»E Thomas A Syto PE FTOenc J Stenoorg. PE Ismael Mamr ez. PE McnaelP Rau. PE Agnes M Pmg. A lCP Thomas W Rnenoa PE Mchaei C Lynch. PE James P Maiand. PE Jerry O ^rtzsch. PE. Scon / A/jsnrk. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE Mark P RdPl PE. Mark A SeexPE Gary W Monen. PE Paul J Ganrxm. A i A Ojoiei J Edgerton. PE A Pck SchmOL PE Ph*p J Casvweii PE MarkO UM l PE Miles B Jen»a PE. L Ph*p Gravei PE Kaien l W«mea PE Gary O KnfloAiz. PE. Kech P vapd PE Douglas J Bmoc PE. ShjMm O Guoaterx PE Cecjko Ohner. PE. Paul G Heuer. P£. John P Goider. PE. Charles A Enctson Leo M PaM«iky Hanan M Olson James F Engena*di c5 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 NOV 1 8 1994 Re: Yorks Residence File No. 139-gen Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the revised proposal submitted today to replace the existing timber retaining wall on the Yorks residence at 2825 Casco Point Road. We understand the urgency to do the work soon to prevent additional damage to the property. The revised plans are acceptable from an engineering standpoint and we would recommend approval. If the height of the wall changes at any time during construction, additional geogrid must be included for support of the wall. Prior to starting the work, silt fence must be installed along the shoreline for erosion control. Please contact me at this ofrice if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc: Dave Stockdale 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MINI 55113 • 612-636-4600 Bon9UtDaih»9nt,Anaem4rHJAssoo^cc%irc tt ^ A/fJWdin^ Acvon^iGi^ Ofipomjnty £ir\pieyff Oao O aoTMUoa VV noifTf PC • jottp*i c ATdrx. PI L ScnrJ • ®fi MC^ L lU'rr PC a Cco% *C T»>ori«i S Moy*i PI MOOfl G k*»unc*»t Pf SuMr M CDf'tr C PA •Sp'’^' Cy'^h-XiPf HO¥v««d A Sr^. •! n«tr A Oe^iop. Pi noon I. •*•<»»« W Pow PC DJVid 0 kJVOU. PP itoorr C t-mk. a a A lOU'W!. PC V#r« A PC ViC^r T ijutrrrvi, PI TPC P ^<K P| T*ig^J I A'lCt'K)*' Ai Oa-»*d C Bm‘9P<4* pc ^rom«* A S/»a Pm J Sct*'qe^ PS M«r »*pi. PI vtrati P fiiu *1 Agnei V Pr%. A.IC • >c»r j| W ArfCTQn. pg .vscnjf* C PI Jinti *. MrJPA Pf -T'Ty D ^'W' PC kCB J A<9if^«. »f Ntrrttn P Arotnor. P| M«r^ I KC«n PC A jp.n p; Q4<) \Ar MO'it'. P| •iw J Gannor. A*A □i'ne* J C(l9fTO'» PI A t«C« ic^W. PC pHl.oJ PP V#r% 0 Vl^ PC Vk’fl I. Jtnffn. P| L PrivpGraw^ PI. L WWff;. Pf C17 0 <iKcnc. •€ Rr!*« t «»0p Pf DOw>«l ^ tc^ PI a ouicjdon pi Cffcta Q'lV ff P| PAi* G pi /qr*r P OotJfr. P| C*>r‘c»A CTMor Ltc M PAA«*wy Nj*iir M 0*ton m pog«*n««c* 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& Associates Engineers & Architects January 11,1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Yorks Residence File No. 139-gen Dear Jeanne. On January 5th we inspected the completed retaining wall at the Yorks residence at 2825 Casco Point Road. Neither the applicant or the contractor contacted the City for Inspection prior to or during construction. The height of the completed wall is two to five feel taller than shown on the approved plans. The plans show 4-feet of exposed wall. We had noted in our previous reviews that "if the height of the wall changes at any time during construction, additional geogrid must be included for support of the wall." The contractor should provide information confirming that additional layers and depth of gcogrid were used to construct the wall due to the increased height. Other aspects shown on the approved plans that should have been inspected include: • bond beam (bridged) construaion in front of existing trees • granular backfill in bridged areas - 14 inches of buried block (18 inches required at increased height) The contractor should provide the City with photographs taken during construction, revised plans showing changes in design and any other Information that would document what steps were taken to reinforce the wall at the increased height. Because the wall was not ^stnicted in accordance with the approved plans, the contractor should provide the City with a letter confirming this fact. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES. INC. t) Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc: Dave Stockdale. Edgework Builders, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN SS113 • 612-636-4600 Allan Block^^ Edgework Builders David Stockdale, President 8301 Audubon Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 November 15, 1994 Re: Yorks Residence, Orono, MN. Dear Mr. Stockdale, Our in-house engineering staff has reviewed the proposed segmental retaining wall which is to replace an exist.ing treated timber retaining wall. While it is true that no failure has occurred and your proposed walls do not substantially change the current wall geometry, this does not assure future success as this assumes a static condition and future conditions could change. Furthermore the construction of said wall(s) is on an overall slope and any design can address internal and external wall stability but not overall slope stability. For these reasons we suggest the following to insure that the replacement wall not exacerbate the current stable condition. 1. All walls should be geogrid reinforced to insure Internal and external stability. 2. Geogrid reinforcement will necessarily require ‘'benching" of the reinforced zone into the existing slope geometry. 3. To insure no future changes in the soil in the reinforced zone: a. use free draining material (limited to 5% fines) in backfill/reinforced zone and leveling pad. b. place drainage tile behind the base course of block zuid also at base of the reinforced zone where it meets the retained soil - all tile draining to daylight. c. backfill the top 6" (below top soil) with impermeable clay soil to prevent surface drainage into reinforced zone. d. grade to prevent surface ponding above walls. 4. Because of the slope at the toe of the wall(s) it is recommended that a minimum of 2 courses of block be buried or H'/7 embedment depth which ever is greater, course buried block for the top 2'wall is adequate. One Allan Block™ Retaining Walls Allan Block Corporation • 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 185 • Edina. MN 55439 • Phone 612/835-5309 • Fax 612/835-0013 Allan Block 5. Your proposed construction procedures are appropriate. I recommend excelsior netting be dormant seeded for Spring germination of appropriate vegetation. 6. All block and grid installation in accordance with the specifications in the Allan Block Design Manual. 7. I have included the engineered wall details for the a 6'wall which represents your major wall including buried block. In sxjmmary; said walls can be constructed as designed with the understanding that design parameters are for internal and external stability only and no provision for overall slope stability. As you noted, the slope has been stable and it is reasonable to assume it will remain so if conditions do not substantially change; the most critical condition being ground water. For this reason we have recommended the above procedures which we feel will insure that no hydrostatic pressures develop and selected backfill will insure soil uniformity and performance. Said construction neither improves or diminishes the global stability of the slope but given that you will be eliminating the most probably failure scenario, your approach is entirely appropriate with the disclaimer that should the total slope fail, sail failure would likely include the retaining walls. Mr. Gustafson of Bonestroo and Associates has apparently expressed concern over the effect of the "weight" of the soils on the slope. This is a legitimate concern. I feel the existing walls suggest adequate bearing capacity and slope stability and the proposed design parameters above will improved the current situation and reduce the prospect of future failure. For the Allan Block Corporation, Don Gordhamer Technical Services copy: Shawn Gustafson Allan Block™ Retaining Walls Allan Block Corporation • 7400 Metro Boulevard. Suite 185 • Edina. MN 55439 • Phone 612/835-5309 • Fax 612/835-0013 u. VH 950.9 BW946.&5 I fi.\r •I?? r \ —H—1- 1 1! 1 i—H—h 1 II 1 4==F 1 1 1 ---1- 1 1 1 —P I I 1 ----P 1 1 4==F 1 1 1 -----1- 1 1 t 1H—r 1 1 g § r—r- 1 1 *1 —T 1 1 r—r 1 1 *1 ----T 1 1 V—h 1 1 4—T 1 1 p—p I I *1 —‘r 1 1 t‘- 1' 1 1 li !h>^ ;r—r tzt ...p —n-----r ■f““r 1 -----rT~^T 1 1 t"— tH—H 1 1 g g 1 1 M 4' 1 1 1* -r 1 1 4—4' 1 1 ip__p 1 1 —*rt'—r 1 II 1 ----T 1 1 r— 1 1 >|nniiiii itzr ! •!I ' ^r—r »“ZI2 H—H 1 1 A A ri 1 1 *1 —‘n—n till *1 —ri-----r 1 1 1 1 i II 1 1 1 1 1 ■ ■M^ 1 1 —1" 1 1 "1 —'X 1 1 T—r 1 1 *1 ----T 1 1 T----1* 1 1 *1 ----T 1 1 4*—r 1 1 *1 —*t 1 1 ■ w II 1 1 1 1 t 1H—I' 1 1• • T 1 1 4—4 1 1 'i‘—1* 1 1 4—4 1 1 4*—H 1 1 4—^ 1 1 —r 1 1 4 -4 1 1 M‘ 1 1 1 1 ■ r 1■ ■M—4 1 1 —ji 1 1 4—4 1 1 ip_—p 1 1 4—4 1 1 —P 1 1 ‘1 —4 1 1 —I* ! 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1t—+ 1 1 t • —V 1 1 *1 —rr—V i 11 1 *1 —‘rr—r 1 III "1 —n—r 1 11 1 *1 -----n—r 1 1 1 1 -Concrete core fill horizontally/ w #4 Re-t^ar « Uli^ OF <ZlOoX> ' I, >1 ■ cZMJC'Z-V4'^\ fuv/hio/4 • i‘.>■ JICJ m s. SITE DATA: WITHIN 75 ‘SET SACK; •TOTAL AREA 862S SF • STAIRS/SIDEWALK AREA -223 SF • SURFACE OF OF TOf OF OfEN CELL MODULAR HmriCWAU -34 SF • NET OPEN 6271 SF •PROPOSED/ EXISTING HARDCOVER PERCENTAGE WITHIN TSV 5ETSACR 4.6SX GRADE LINE A PLAN ...J.. .. tJ v-Ia C a p X-« U_ a J *-!-> 14-f — — —. ----------— ^ TW 95035 ’ EL 946.56 ’. aw 945.10 / r LNCX3. EL 939.73^ .. f 6RADEUNE5 GRAPE LINE A SECTION r -0HW9294* Edgework Builders, Inc. IS5 1)01 AUDUION lOAD •aiAKHASSEN.MN SS1I7 ntodt: («12) IM-lSl I Fas: ((12) )4(-)SS0 XKMWMfa ^j^p y(mS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD ORONO.MN P)Thl* pUm ohAl romaln thd propoity of Edflework aulUiort. Inc. (E.b.1). Any reproduction or um of thit pUn ivlthout E.b. 1. (written permliilon nrlll not txe otlomied Ufuutliorlzod UM ohoQ entitle E.D.L to ell deme^eo CMMcd by ouch uaer Including preperetlon end ettomeye feet.AHVlOOl UI!R IPCSICICK; n A10/30/94 1 PAS 10/26 I I r •' ’ • /y T •. * • :i ^ mi n : ' ■ ■n I':- . ’: 1^ V if- “ .-V' ■. 4w»- -fl'.^K'- V ,‘::^*.-.-.r ,* . ^i^.' I fc;;i'r >1* f tyi -., * , u:.; :* /. * • L- > V b. -. : v:’ ^ ' ’i^ .*i - , [jV. p^.' ^ .• ?? V'*0.'• • l •. smihWt Vi’i -• ' V ;*,.< ■ « .r * *• .•<*:v^V^.-IVS ''A*-'- >'.-^ *;.’''j.v v‘ •^^?; Vv V*'-, »» *VV1,, t . #. .■ ^4.V• v*vi v' • *f •/< )■ <• » %• ^ #• .h z\ 85:!/h / .• • •■.■• Sfi\« •V. •■>' ■'-:f ifVxmrf. *»'7 ^ VI ^ # V' ?.^*.V ‘ / •% •• s* - ♦ ^ ^ % •# / t^V V-- W>.rl ■ ♦ ^^,*1 »r. V ' :‘ r' •» 'V«.U4 A ‘*>7< ‘ ‘ *’j *^. •'*» Ti'. • *■ t « . ir ♦ .. l3i iT 'i ,**•rV'r , • •#, < *^'•*'•» t.' •' ■ .•»»&. f sLV-*- *v -^r.-*.*i *“ r«. V / X / r i.. / • V •i*\’i§ ^ ..k* •• • * t * T. ^^*' •>,' ’^^ *^*-»* * • * . . ;' . . ... ... 'V- /y. - > - V •. / .%#.• • .* ^ ^' f • : '••.X.:*>i^'"' V . ^ • * i T’* • V -.1 |[ • k. •' ■•• ••' - -:• •» .•>%.. I . , V • ■,•’<♦ ,* • «t .-*• •• w?. *.*•,% /• s* vUfciA ’f -S A,. ^ .*• S. ; : • •• ^ V i w-. Mil DATE n/07/94 BATCH SB5 PROP AOOR QMIER tUME TAXPAYER NAHE/ABOR 38 20-117>23 32 0012 02815 CASCO POIMT RO J L STERN J L STERN 2815 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN S53T1 HEMIEPIN COUMIV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS UST58 20-117-23 32 0013 02011 CASCO POINT RO CMENOOIYN C ROSS CHEN L ROSS 2811 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA rM 5S3T1 REPORT HO. PXA55401 PAGE A38 20-117-23 32 001402887 CASCO POINT RO J H A P S 8A1LEY JOHN M A PATRICIA S 8AUEY 2887 CASCO POINT R8 HAYZATA MM 55591 PROP AOOR OT84ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 58 20-117-23 32 0015 02805 CASCO POINT RO ROGER H FROftICLT A HITS ROGER N PR0M1CLT 2805 CASCO FT RO NAYZATA ttl S5S91 38 20-117-23 32 OOlA 82800 CASCO POINT RB THONAS • KING TNQKAS 8 KINO 2800 CASCO POINT ROAO NAYZATA Ml 5SS91 30 20-117-23 52 0017 02810 CASCO POINT RD TAHKY I N0081S TAHNY 1 MOOOIS 2018 CASCO POINT ROAO NAYZATA Ml 5S391 PNDP AOOR OM«R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 20-117-23 32 0018 02794 CASCO POINT RO LAURIE r quiiti LAURIE QUlfOl 2794 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml 55391 38 20-117-23 52 8021 03799 CASCO AVE JOHN 0 ALCXANBER JOHN 0 ALEXANOCR 3799 CASCO AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 503 00028 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM *CCWATi A» REPRESMITATION OF INFORHATIOH AS IT *^‘*^*"*^J* Of THE MEMCPIN COUNTY OEPARTMEMT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KNONLEBGE ANO BELIEF. om Il f M .V WTY T PIAIXVPI# IW in I$ I "UN QATC 11/07/94 NCtMEPXN COUNTY PROPEm INFOmUTION SVSTEH RCMMT HO. P143S491MTClil: 503 •, •PROPERTY Oi««RS UST PAGE 5 9 s-rPROP ADOR OHHEH NAHE taxpayer NAMt/ADOR • SO E0>117-E3 23 0012 02/74 CASCO POINT RO ROIEN A PRICE ETAL ROtEN A PRICE 2774 CASCO POINr RO HAYZATA HN 55591 30 20-117-23 31 000903753 CASCO AVE . RICHARO L KAIL RICHARD L KAIL 5753 CASCO AVE HAYZATA 194 55391 3S 20-117-2S 001005759 CASCO AVE •RUCE 0 HAMEN ETAL BRUCE 0 MAOOIN 3759 CASCO AVENUE HAYZATA HN 55391 y y • • RROPjkDOR 0»*«E| NAHE TAXPiyIa n«h!/AOOR • . 30 20*117-23 31 0011 00030 ADDRESS IMASSIGHEO DEAN V iMElHAfOl OEAN V ORCIMAHN 3779 CASCO AVE NAVZATA 104 5S391 SO 20-117-23 31 0014 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIONED HENNEPIN FORTEITEO LAND CITY OF ORONO LOCAL PON01N6 AREA 9/5/00 ST DEED 150097 30 20-117-23 31 0015 00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO HENNEPIN fORFEITED LAND cm Of OPONO CONVEYED 2/D/6E ST DEED 141lAA • r y *4 PROP AOOR OMNEE NAME taxpWcr NAKl/AOim •« 30 20-117*23 31 0014 00030 ADDRESS UNASS1GI4E0 HEfOCPIN FORFEITEB UNO ClIY OF ORONO CONYEYCD 2>^2 ST DEED 141144 # SO 20-117-23 31 0054 02071 CASCO POINT RD R E NOLFE R E NOLFE 2071 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA Itl 55391 IS EO-U7-2S n S0S7 . 02SS5 CASCO POINT M ROSEMARY C IVERSEN ROSEHARV IVERSEN 2055 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA m 55391 > > 0 PROP i^R onner name taxpayer NAME/ADOR 1 ■ SO 20-117-23 31 0050 05721 CASCO AVE 0 R HELTY ANN JZN 0 R HELTY A H H JIN 3721 CASCO AVE NATZATA HN 55391 30 20-117-23 31 0044 03779 CASCO AVE OEAN V CREIHAItl OEAN V OREINANN 3779 CASCO AVE HAYZATA roi 55391 • • 30 20-117-23 31 0047 02648 CASCO POINT RO aiARLES F NELSON • HIFC CHARtES i LUCY NELSON E640 CASCO pomr RS HAYZATA HN 55591 ) • .1 1 PROP AOOR 0»««R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR • • 30 20-117-23 32 0004 02024 CASCO POINT RO FRANK H KAYLOR FRANK KAYLOR 2024 CASCO POINT RO KAYZATA HN 55391 SO 20-117-25 32 0007 02029 CASCO POINT RS 0 E PETERSON A N P PETERSON ORYCE E PETERSON AND NARY PAT PETERSON 2629 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391 SS 20-117-75 52 0006 02825 CASCO POINT RO OAVIO J YORKS 1 NIfE DAVID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA HN 55581 * J A PROP AOOR OHNER NAHC TAXPAYER MAHE/AOOR 30 20-117-23 32 0009 02021 CASCO POINT RO R E OEHSHAR ANN OEMSMAR .RONALO A HAR6ARET OEHSHAR 2621 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN 55391 30 20-117-23 32 0010 02S17 CASCO POINT RD HESLEV C OYRNE HESLEV C OYRNE 2017 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA Itl 55391 58 20-117-25 52 0011 02815 CASCO POINT RO 0 A C SCANLON GENE t CATHERINE SCANLON 2015 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391 A *• A Ik..^,-------- THIS nEW HIS BEW XICRQFIIMED • • • •*.• ; f • Ccncrfi*^otCif 0^atf • O \ ?lftt. of Surv*?y *if.rKSfor !>.vid .: cf bet IIT, Sorief: Piric Hennepin County, Minm-ectfi Certiricate cf Survey: I her»?toy c^rtlfV that this is a trxio arc rerrect repre- sertatlon of a eurvey of the bounderlee of Lot 117, Spring Park, including that oart cf Shore Avenue, vacated, and that part of tho lar^ l«- tveen said vacated avenue anc the shore of Lake Minnetonka Iving between the sldellnea of aa ’id Let 117 extended to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and of the location of all buildings thereon, ■ end all visible encroachments fren or on ssid land. Since the original plat does net give complete mathe- ratlcftl information on tho bcunderles of sold lot, this survey has been based urcr. orerlcusly-existlnp moru- • * mentatlm of tho lot. Scale: 1" =30* Ikte : 9-19-75 • ! Iron marker fo;ind o : Iren marker set Cordon R. roffin Rep;. Nc. Land Surveyor and Planner Lcr.g Lake, liinnescta A V .5^ TO: FROM: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:January 11, 1995 SUBJECT: #1987 Larry Pillar, 2705 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, area of lot 15,000 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 250-500’ setback area = 15,000 s.f. Allowed = 4,500 s.f. or 30% Existing = 3,822 s.f. or 25.4% Proposed = 3,822 s.f. or 25.4% No variance required. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 - Structural coverage. Allowed = 2,250 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1.709 s.f. or 11.3% Proposed = 1,709 s.f. or 11.3% No variance required. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Side yard variance. Required = 10’ Existing = 4.7’ Proposed = 4.7’ Variance = 5.3’ or 53% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Neighbors’ Acknowledgment Form E - Foundation Plan/Conceptual Elevation F - Hardcover G - Survey Description of Request The applicant commenced foundation repairs of a three season porch and proceeded to replace wood frame walls and roofing. All of the work commenced without a building permit. 'The project was shut down by the building staff. When a survey was obtained by the owner, it was t Zoning File #1987 January 11, 1995 Page 2 discovered that the existing structure is only 4.7’ from the side lot line, review Exhibit B. A 14’ unimproved alley separates the property to the immediate north. Upon your inspection note the privacy fence installed within the unimproved right-of-way. The neighbor to the immediate north has provided an acknowledgment form and has voiced no concern with the proposed reconstruction of the three season porch in its former envelope. The three season porch is 10.9’xl5.3’. The struchire not only serves as a three season porch but provides an enclosed entrance to the lower level basement. Pillar began to make repairs to foundation and decided to replace the foundation. With foundation repairs he found the stud walls and siding needed replacement. The renter advised of a leak in the porch roof and when the roof was inspected for repair decided that it too should be replaced. Applicant advises based on the approximate age of the house and the condition of the structure that the three season porch had probably existed for fifty years on the property. Mr. Pillar, the applicant, is the owner of the property but does not reside at the residence. The structure is a rental property. The owner resided at the property approximately five years ago. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A, hardships are reviewed as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Location of fifty year old house on property that was installed prior to current zoning standards. There is no visual impact on adjacent residence. The 14’ unimproved alley provides an additional buffer to the residence to the north receiving most impact from the structure located 4.7’ from the side lot line. The structure has existed on the property for over fifty years. , The structure provides an intemal/enclosed access to basement level. If unimproved 14’ alley was vacated, this property would receive benefit of the entire 14’ right-of-way because the alley was dedicated with the platting of the Casco Heights plat in 1911. Issues for Consideration 1. Could structure have been rebuilt on property meeting required side setback of 10’? On your inspection note location of windows to immediate south of the three season porch. Also internal access to basement is through this portion of residence. Zoning File #1987 January 11, 1995 Page 3 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission, Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that applicant make payment for a penalty building permit to allow completion of construction. Members should be aware tlut the building official has accepted the foundation plans and other mformation submitted with variance application as acceptable and complete for a building permit application. r CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.(X) (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming strucmres $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 4 #1987 i 1 PROPERTY INFORMATON Site Address D Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)yio-ui-4^3-Xi oo77 rtTV rc UX I I Wl CMWMV.'rT#ru;rr rrccrrr I wi I A i/L- Jl V V'^ VV* V* f rru V.* \/X CUM f-ACii Tlunwff **- uv\.»* ui*fT7DT«‘i;a ;,v vr.fMuuuar • # f »r*MM f u*u fGf*» u'M? TTw*—V^U'V UV*CJk MV'A » X i 1 /T .A J./ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired__________/ ^ -------------------------- I (do) (g^liotD also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential ___^other (specify) Zoning District:^_________________________________ (month/year) Address: Cot/f // Phone fliome) 33 6 ^_____ Phone(work) Y 9/- /0i>£> City: Y^Out^P ~ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name XA ________ Phone(home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: 'CaJT' v^T 4 bP^ '(attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) hardship /description of unusual property CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficuLy or unusual pr^rty condmons preventmg u/ifh Znninc Code reauirements: ^ OCis^\0\y -----ijOoi f~ ^ [McAu^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMnTALS All of the folinwing information must be sl omitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour aDPlication to be considered complete; » '^Completed Application Form 7/^Certifrd Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from ^Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). i/Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). jXfcertificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8V4" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'^" x 11" for reproduction. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. '/^ketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (i) copy 8'A" x 11"). “7List of the legal names (include marital stanis) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). __As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant- and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance anniication is not complete if the above information has npt been in<;M^iL APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE ^ . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses i^urred in rpview.of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true ahd correct t(/th4 WWt of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signamre Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property bv City staff, consultant apnts. Commission members, and CouncU members for purposes oy mvestigation md jveri^ation of this request. Owner’s Signamre Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Co^ssion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each mom. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, pl^e m^e arra^^ents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildmg & Zomng Office of Jiis change prior to the meeting. 8 1, < r*- RUN DATE 12/01/94 BATCH 00?• •COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEMPROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR r' .r PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR • k >i. **• -V . I38 20*117-23 28 000102A88 CASCO POINT RO 0 L RUNKLE A L F RUmi OAVIO L RUNKLE 2A88 CASCO POINT RD ■. HAYZATA MM 5SS81 : . '' i 38 20-117-23 28 0013 02700 ETHEL AVE JULIA S JENSEN JULIA S JENSEN 2700 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 28 OOU 02785 ETHEL AVE BENJAMIN R JENSEN BENJAMIN JENSEN 2785 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 A,■'t&.-V'-- :•> . f •/ r • ' i : Vv . f • '*• *.V* • »k- . **v •’* * ^ ■ '' • 'V. •- • • • .1, \;*fi,:vVv ••.r.’v> - ' ::Y » * 'CA». -11 ?»f.' ^ j\'** i • - i‘. • '- vV*', • , . • • .i* • -^v . 0 PROPERTY OI««RS LISTf. ,• 9 '■38 20-117-23 28 000802488 CASCO POINT RO 0 L RIPOCLE ALP RUNKLE DAVID L RUMCLE 2888 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA TM 55391 ■ ; :-'t t . j ' •> A f..- 4 • •4‘ ,'t> - ■ , 38* 20-117-23 28 0018 02705 ETHEL AVE LANRENCE 0 PILLAR LAHRENCE 0 PILLAR 8827 CARDINAL COVE OR HOUND MN 55388 \. !- ■ V » . V « 3B 20-117-23 24 0020 02750 CASCO POINT RO DALE A CHRISTENSEN t NIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 •‘.'mT. t i.vv * . i / ' ■ • • *' i* ‘• 38 . 20-117-23 28 0017 02755 ETHEL AVE SONCOR INVESTMENTS SAN CAR INVESTMENTS PO BOX 578 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 \ r*:.. ".'i-:fe . C- • j 38 » 20-117-23 28 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RO ' H A 8 J PALMER CURTIS H A BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO POINT RD . NAYZATA W • 55391 i.’; . •>.. 38 20-117-23 28 0088 ■ V h - ■;K' »% - ■ J “ • • ’•'V:. *f • . I -1 • i • ■ f ; i A 38 20-117-23 28 0080 ^ . 02720 ETHEL AVE . r, :! 7;^ ^ ,• :.02898\ ETHEL AVE JOHN NAYNE A JOYCE E HAMBLET h ♦ ‘ ^ ' J"«T C KAUFFMA^M. JOHN H A JOYCE HAMBLET • , . KAUFFMANN 2720 ETHEL AV . • 'H, : ; 'i.*Z898 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA m 55391 - - C. / HAYZATA 1*1 . 55391 't ♦. *#• f; ‘ •. ’»%. ■ i'i 3B 20-117 02891 ETHEL MICHAEL 0 MICHAEL 0 REVIER 2891 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI835801 PACE 538 20-117-23 28 001002780 ETHEL AVE L L VICKNAIR A R L VICKNAIR LANCE L A RHOOA L VICKNAIR •27'\0 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA (tl 55391 38 20-117-23 28 0015 02725 ETHEL AVE 6 P A 0 L L0RSUN6 G P A 0 L LORSUNG 2725 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA 1*4 55391 38 20-117-23 28 0019 02750 CASCO POINT RO . DALE A CHRISTENSEN A HIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA t*4 55391 38 20-117-23 28 0022 02700 CASCO POINT RO 0 P BUESING A L R RUNNING DANIEL BUESING/LINOA RUNNING 2700 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 28 0085 02897 ETHEL AVE C GORUON AMUNDSON ET AL C GORDON AMUNDSON 2697 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 'ill'*',.4 • j < ' -.'i . T , \ • ‘ t V ^ ;T ‘ j “ I V « j»‘A y*r5 , RUN DATE 12/01/94 BATCH 002 'mombxn county property INTORHATION SYSTEH . • - V • ' 7 t-, •' PROPERTY OltlERS LIST * r . ':o-r .i- ’V • • ,•• ^JV ••••■•-■',•' r>-v ’•= •.■ ■•'. . 5 .. .‘V ,:vr . V ' *»V * •' • ty • 1 .' • x-i. .' <••!' * .- ; •' ■• M .•, r- r r - ■: ^ ■ .4 , .V'v.Vv^^•!‘J•I•^ . / t / •.i.'-s*. •; 5^v* g s ' r'- r THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE OF XNFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST AND BELIEF. £/iMdT\i^ i' Wyim: "Bissas momsm or srum rm LOTS * i. / 0 <• Adjacent Property Owners* ?^/poc~ 4^ n ^ Coox>,^.a/ Ha^UaJk^vir_ wners* Acknowledeement Form ft cc- I (we) /^, _______ [print name(s)] '2. A 9 7 O' /ILza ^A [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at pi 0 ^ tt, /}f/^also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires^gjacTncU^roval. /?/- 9^^ Pi-operty Owner ' Property Owner Date ♦♦♦♦♦*♦*♦•*♦*•♦♦*•*****•*♦***♦*♦***♦♦**♦♦♦ I (we)[print address][print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located 3j __________________also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbo project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this ^ U« Application, please submit your comments to the BuUdmg & Zonmg Office at least 10 days pn to the scheduled meeting date. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one ) 0-75' 75-450' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH B. Garage c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck 11. 11 F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other WIDTH _ X w // . X /3 Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ^0-5^ 500-1000 ■/M S.P. S.P. S • F • S.P. S.P. S.P. /4*ro S.P S.P 5 S.P. S.P. m S.P. S.P S.P S.P . S.F S.P S.F 3-3- S.F. ~a ] -r|T| X 100 1^000 S.F. [T , % ! •• • • • M»t71 CortificcTte of Survey Tor I.fii ry I* ill nr or Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Casco Heights Hennepin County, Minnesota rixistinq l.egiil Desrrir^tion Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Casco Heights. This survey shows the location of an existing house on the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. •: Iron marker found o; Iron marker set fsa.fr C) ( 5 Com\ & Gronberg, Inc. •■i: i! *1 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super­ vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil hngineerand hand Siirvey(»r under the laws of the State t»f Minnesota. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 DAre 9-/5-9^ M Al K I ” • 30 ' iobno5?^-3-^5 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 9, 1995 #1988 Kenneth J. and Eileen F. Severinson, 2800 Shadywood Road - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Approximate area = 39,000 s.f. (majority of property is located within 0-75’ setback area at approximately 29,500 s.f.) Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Setback variance required for reinstallation of new sections of privacy fence adjacent to channel at southwest side of property. Required = 75’ Existing = 5’ (measured from seawall at Narrows Channel) Proposed = 5’ Variance = 70 ’ Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (E & F) - Allowed accessory structures within lakeshore protected area; lockboxes, stairways, lifts and landings. Fencing is not allowed within protected area and requires variance approval prior to installation. List of Exhibits A - Application A-1- Applicant’s Addendum B - Property Owners’ List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Adjacent Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Forms F - Hennepin County Public Works Acknowledgement Form G - Dennis Bailey of Hennepin County Public Works Letter Description of Request A 6-6 Vi’ high privacy fence has existed on this proi^rty for over 15 years. It is located approximately 130 ’ along the channel side and 60+’ within the west street yard. Portions of the fencing were either repaired or replaced sometime within the summer of 1994. The newly constructed fence was observed by the Inspection staff. The applicant was advised of the need to apply for a variance. Zoning FUe #1988 January 9, 1995 Page 2 The fence located approximately 5' from seawall at the channel side and has been reinstalled at the same setback as the previous fence. The entire fence is located within the 75’ setback area. The applicant has provided 1988 photos of the former fencing taken at the time of an appraisal of the property. Photos have been provided showing the newly re­ installed/repaired fence and will be available at your meeting. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit A-1. Hardships are reviewed as follows: 1.The Narrows Channel is a high traffic inlet/outlet between the Lower Lake and the Upper Lake. There is a need for both visual and noise protection from the noise of the boat traffic and sounds of the boaters that pass through the channel. 2.The Channel is heavily trafficked both in the summer by boaters and the winter by snowmobilers. 3. 4. 5. The remaining private properties along the channel have similar privacy fencing. Elimination of the fence would significantly reduce the value of property. The property is located directly across from the Tonka Bay fishing park where the public is allowed to fish. Fencing helps to define the private property along the channel from the public fishing areas. 6.The fence provides noise protection and visual protection from the public fishing in the park. The park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing throughout the entire summer. 7. The majority of the area of this is located within the lakeshore protected area. Any recommendation of approval must include the requirement that applicant obtain a penalty building permit for repair and installation of new fencing within lakeshore yard. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address____2800 Shadvwood Road# Orono. MN ____ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 21-117-23-13-0023-38 CITY CF CFOnO finance office 1300200000 gCit V • VV Ti vAt ;f'Lxry Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired July/ 1993 / ii ‘ *r*0 T — TLi.' • .* K yfj!!ntLuii f tt ntfts »ww (iflpii^year>^ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: x residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:_____________________________ Ti»** iTvi i T* i Ate.* .4^* ' APPLICANT Phone (home) 471-0262_____ Name Kenneth J. & Eileen F. Severinson Phone(work) 337-1826 _____ Address: 2800 shadvwood Road________City: Orono-------------------Zip: 553^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name same As Above _____ Phone(home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request indetad: Estimated Construction Cost $ 1/200 (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ^ Other (specify) Approval of Fence Repaired/Replaced HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: --------------- ' See Attached _____________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS #1 ^ Q O si^ All of the following infonnation must be gihmittcd bv the application deadline date in order for vour i>pplirarinn to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. X Completed Application Form X Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). X Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). __Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8V4 x 11 for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade ~ are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8>A" x 11" for reprod^tion.^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8’/^" x 11"). IT List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant- and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your; variance application is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE u -r The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or request^ by the Zonmg Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (^ff time not coyer^ by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in reyicw of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is trq^^and correct to ^ie best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s SienatureA^^tM^* rnMAXTinir f ^OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to^ application and further authonxes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, constants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes ^^vestiption a^^erification of this request. Owner’s Signamre AppUcant must haveffl'^^S® mtoS^^ offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. AppUcants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arra^OTents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zonmg O ice o this change prior to the meeting. 8 / ATTACHMENT TO VARIANCE APPLICATION KFNNF.TH AND EILEEN SEVERINSON DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST;^ X 9 I Request for variance for repair and partial replacement of privacy/noise abatement fence (the "Fence") along side (East) and rear (South) of our residence. The Fence is at least 15-20 years old and suffered damage from frost heaves and lack of general maintenance. The Fence is parallel to the narrows and between Lafayette and Carmen Bay across from the Tonka Bay Fishing Park and in front of the Narrows Bridge on Shadywood Road. The residence was purchased and remodeled with permit, after purchase in July, 1993. The Fence was repaired and partially replaced in June, 1994. A variance was not requested since we were not aware it was required to repair and/or replace an existing fence. HARDSHIP DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS; The following is a summary of unusual property conditions which we believe are pertinent. 1. Our property is located directly on the West side of the na^:-ows channel between Lafayette Bay and Carmen Bay on Lake Minnetonka. The narrows channel is a high traffic inlet/outlet between the lower lake and the upper lake. The Fence, which is wood with vertical slats (stockade type), is approximately 6 to 6-1/2 feet high, provides significant noise protection from boat traffic and boaters going through the channel (see attached photo's) in summer and from snowmobile traffic in winter. It also provides significant visual privacy for our back yard and side yard from passengers on boats and snowmobiles going through the narrows. Other private property on the narrows channel have similar fencing. We understand the Fence was initially built to provide privacy and noise protection. Elimination of the Fence would significantly reduce the value of our property. 2. Located directly across from our property is the Tonka Bay Fishing Park (see attached photo). The Park allows for fishing along the East side of the narrows channel from under the Narrows Bridge all the way to the Northeast point of the narrows (all other property on the narrows, including ours, is private and are non-fishing areas). The Fence provides noise protection and visual protection from people fishing in the Park. The Fence also assists in the enforcement of posted no fishing zones on our side of the channel. The Park is heavily used and crowded with people fishing throughout the summer. Elimination of the Fence would reduce the privacy of our property, increase noise levels, and accordingly, reduce the value of our property We respectfully request approval of this applica^<idn and granting of an appropriate variance. ‘ << % • • • * ' ^ *» f* * * • * ‘ '^ . ' 4,. .58 2X-117-25 15 00258HAOYHOOO RO V ,*v.;*r >.HE^t4EPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LISTPROP AOOR V i V 02600 I r^^ 0H»«r1uM6'^ > StVERXNSON » E F HOFFMAN TAXPAYER *i’V’KENNETH SEVERINSON I:^>NAHE/AOORj;i, 2800 SHADYNOOO RO ;V:4 = . - ; -i ; /:• EXCELSIOR m 55531 5 ;• :i ■> S8‘- 21-117-25 ooao . ^ *f. PR0P AOOR /,'T 02700 SHAOYHOOO RO I f/i 0I04ER NAHE>< A J KLOTSCHE A J A KLOTSCHE ••* (U TAXPAYER ALLAN J A JUDITH A KLOTSCHE ‘ jK/'MAME/AOORvf 2700 SHADYNOOO RO W , • . ■. • excelsior m 55331 '1/ V •' •*.' *» r '<i • ' > ^ iii * ' • 58 ^ 21-117-23 31 0002 PROP AOOR V 02795 SHADYNOOO RO ;"4>c O»MER NAME $ RAPA BECK ‘iilTAXPAYER ^ ' STEVEN R A PEGGY A BECK 3:i;j NAME/ApOR ',.2795 SHADYNOOO RO i' '4 a * '• ' Tr.„ i; ' ■;ivi V • EXCELSIOR NN 55331 , ... Sf : * 'i • .. • dv^- v. ; v^'Vt ,V •.« / . •* » ‘ * • .* .'*•-C'*' V *•.r ^ •* *, .•.'-I'l-'.-u;' '• ■■>••“■ '',1 . •.. - • .. I,* . W ‘ . •» ■ rf • I " i ».•: . •' 3a 21-117-23 24 0009 02775 SHAOYHOOO RO .! .riON ■ SYSTEM "'‘.rW'-r ' .'58'21-117-25 20 0055 ; 00038•• AOORESS UNASSXONEO ’ 8 K OLSON TRUSTEE //S RAPA 8ECK • • *> '.. .:, .r ' BONNIE K OLSON - / . ' ' STEVEN R A PEGGY A BECK 2775 SHAOYHOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 95531 r. , * ’ 2795 SHAOYNOOO RO 02760 SHADYNOOO RO H R NITTMER ASK HITTMER * N R HITTMER ASK HITTMER 2780 SHADYNOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . .. I excelsior. MN., 55351 ’ : ' * J • M \J » •* «^* * * •' -.f** ‘ ^ * •<•<••.*' t * ^ » • •••“•.* V ■ ■-. . •. .‘ ’< *** f'Ct.’v' ■ '• ’ * • ^ - ' * • ■ •• • .V'., ' ■ ^ A* 38 21-117-25 Z<* OOAl . ,, ) • if fi-:,. 58 ‘ 21-117-23 2A 005*• '.4i‘ ‘ tUv. r; ' 02785 . v.': ^:« ••• ’T. 97 21-117-23 00097 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HEM4EPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT OF 520 NASHINGTON HOPKINS THOMAS J casey •'■*• i- RO •.■.^^•'^>:^V^. 2785 SHABY-NOOO RO ' 55531 . -r/K. 'EXCELSIOR . 5S331:j:;,'f • •^ . *■■ ■: . -.A'.''. ■ ■‘•V '.«•.. • '' . ■ 'i .i'.'j- ■ V S'V • ,* .»T.: - A t \9 *. • ^ ; P * ' t ' -V>‘ * ‘f ^ • >. • . ■ • v*' ^ * *^*.’ * .A** '**'i* ., < >“ ^*,A*" *r — c i«j*ceTajen V-. vAi : r. ■• > '. .HEO ■ v'-A*. '•’it--- *' '■ i \ . ■ ■ r : ’J- OOA. 00008 , . vt , V* • ‘ •sJ . J • - . • * ♦ -c: • .V . - ‘if • • % PRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE* AND* TRUE ‘ XI CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS . OF THE HEWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATXON» TO THE BEST- ,, . - » OF MY KNOHLEDGE ANO BELIEF. ■it *■ . ‘xxfx .. t' .vj"'" 'r' .T. r . . • • , . •**' -* *•^.^*■,*'*4*1"' ' ^ ^ . i *4 A • » • ‘ . • s» •# \ *. «» f • f *• -1 Svi REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. •ear:riqs Chown Are Assunied. "o" Osnofes Iron Monument, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA JANUARY, 1966 SCALE: 1" » SO' EGAN, FILLI) i NO.YAK Engineers 4 Surveyors Minnetonka p-'y's’ fi:.y ' i A--'**' ' hereby certify thnt In accordance with the provlsl.:ns of C^Kuiter /r I rn»i?£.ola Stotiites of 1949, as •ended, I have surveyed the fol levying described trod oK/KTnd In the County of Hennepin and Stale of rnesoto, towit: Vacts C and F, Weul«*er«d Land Sur^pfy Uo, 420, Files of K-Mjlitrar of Titles, Conn I y H»»nnerln, except Ihj "jouthwei.t.>r |y 7 f.?et of saj^^'^octs. ^atylhe sury^ hereon is a correct •'lineal Ion of said survey. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ted this dov of Jent^Ar^' a . D..^^f966. Surveyor - A\lnnesota Regl stro 11 on No, 6122 / is r«ci?t ‘*red land survey v/as approv^Tl and accepted by the VI I loqe Counci I of Orono, Mlrnesoto, at a qiilar meetinn thereof helo this____/__^3y of ________________''.D. 1966, vlllacje Council of ureno, Vinr.esota by _________________________________________Moyor by ___________________________________________CI er k • o #108 /IPAfori« Lb C/lTion b P" i tJ A-f / I (wc) /?/>/! iv Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form [print address] ’[print name(s)J have revised Ac plans proposed improvement or proposed use of Ae property located at referred to as Land Use Application No. _TrS:, I (we) understand !Jiat m executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval cr r -approval of Ae property or use but merely to confirm for Ac City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of Ae improvement plans and Aat Ae proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council approval. V.>T<1 ^ Property Owner -7 1 t'l ^■ r y /- 4" - 7'^ Date Property Owner ♦*♦♦♦**♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦**•♦♦♦♦***♦*•**♦*•••**♦•*•••♦•***•*•**•**•*••*•**************** [print addres^ irty located I (we) [print name(s)] I (we) understand that m executmg this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of Ae property or use but merely to confirm for Ae City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of Ae improvement plans and that Ae proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner DateProperty Owner If you have any information that may assist Ae City m Ae review of ihf Application, please submit your comments to Ae Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to Ae scheduled meetmg date. Adjacent Property Owners’ Acimowledgement Fonn I AS. rS.A AfLcrjSC He _ of J [print name(s^ [print addre^ls] have reviewed the nlans forproposed improvement or proposed use of the property located -------^ ____r____A «o T TTc^ AnnliVafirm No . tnCl)i2LIIS IQTylO^ prupuscu liiipiuvtuiwuv vri referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understaiid that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. /- 7- Date DateProperty Owner I (we) of [print narae(s)] have reviewed the_plans for^proposed improvement or-t)posed use of tteproK^ jt l-thO T)SAulJ.'/?/iifrJisa referred to as Land Use Application No. —• roperty located I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (^) not “^ed m declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to Council tLt I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor project or use requires Council approval. peny OwnerPropel Date DateProperty Owner If you have any informaiion that may assist the City in the t^iew of Application, please submit your comments to the Buildmg &. Zonmg Office at least 1 y P to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) [print name8f [print address/^ ' have reviewed the plans foe the proposed improvement or proposed use of the located at referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. /g- V-f-r_____ D4ttProperty Owner Date [print name(s)l address] have reviewed the p’; as for the proposed improvement or proposed use of at also referred to as Land Use Application No. /1Q5 __^ I (we) undersand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (m) not “ declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merey to Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner If you have any information that may assist the Cjp “ r«iew of tto Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zomng ice to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Prope^ Ojmtxs^ Acknowledgement Fonn [print name(s)] have reviewed the pl­ at tprmt addi«s] fi, ^ the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located also referred to as Land Use Application No. p" I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner I (we) HBAftiBP/Ai Cou^OTy Pu^i>iC / [print name(s)l [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the pro^rty located at SfMOmxtM Jt6&0 also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement. I (we) am (^) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbo project or use requires Council approval. ■ Ptoperty Owner* Co/J5ftWWriiDd Uorr Mt-t Date / ^ y /ii~i-y Property Owner -4 . V. /‘its If you have any infonnaiion that may assUt Ihe City in the review of thu Und u» Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zonmg Office at least 10 day p to the scheduled meeiing date. S' ^ . a^AaO ,^UA^J .xxiUk'H^ Xta -^-Vw^ id - ^ - ^ ipe^ I (we) //^ 1>7/ A' ' (print n£me(s)] ' Adjacent Propertv O^vners’ Acknowledgement Form /f/r ^ [print address] have reviewed the plans fpr the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at a ttlso referred to as Land Use Application No. __. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date ♦***<i*******************************♦♦♦♦*♦*♦♦**♦*♦♦*♦*»•*******♦**♦***•******* I (we) CouAjry Pu6ijc 4J&/riof V/7 f/fr^5h—/ [prim name(s)j [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of tbe pro^«y at iScb 5fHOfuxoO also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (^) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the propos. g project or use requires Council approval. > ■ Property Owner- Co^I5e^iJWP()0 Uoir Date ^ nis -y Prppeny O^er ^i.3VS V3/ff If vou have any information that may assist the City in the review of ^se your conunents to Ute Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to the scheduled meeting date. ^TovVlf*XeM,T CtiNi oP 9 COPY William J, Stoddard January 9,1995 Mr. Edward Callahan, Mayor Orono City Council Members Orono Planning Commissioners P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Subject:Land Use Application at 2605 Kelly Avenue Dear Orono Officials: This is just a friendly note to you in the event you have wondered about the pile of dirt in front of our home, and to update you prior to our upcoming Planning Commission meeting on our proposed pond. We now understand we were a permit shy in order to proceed with the excavation at my residence, due to my miscoromunication. We had already obtained Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers Permits, and I was informed that "all other local parties had been informed about this matter." In addition, I had been communicating with Mr. John Gerhardson of Orono about this and related street flooding maters, and I erroneously assumed that I had satisfied City of Orono policy. This mix-up is entirely my responsibility, and we have subsequently furnished the City a Land Use Application for your review. In summary, it is our intent to have a pretty pond which doubles as a water retention area to help with the flooding on Kelly Avenue. This flooding makes it virtually impossible to access our driveway at times and for local traffic to pass. We applied for and were granted permits from the MCWD and Corps of Engineers for excavating the pond for rea.sons of aesthetics; environmentalism, (fill had previously been placed in this portion of this property years ago, and now is home primarily to the exotic "purple loostrife;" and water storage. We are very hopeful that this proposal satisfies yourself. City policy, and shows that we are trying to do something which is helpful to Orono and its taxpayer^. Even though we did not quite fully comprehend Orono’s permit system to-date, we look forward to a mutually beneficial decision permitting us to complete the 1/2 day of required work. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono, Minnesota 55331 f n. TO:Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE;January 11, 1995 SUBJECT; #1989 William Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District; LR-IB, approximate area 1 + acres. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Conditional use permit reouired for excavation of a 60’x60* pond within the street yard of lakeshore property. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant ’s Addendum C - Property Owner’s List D - Plat Map E - Partial Survey F - Proposed Grading Changes in Kelly Avenue Right-of-Way G - Landscape Plan H - Gustafson Report I - Department of the Army Report 9/16/94 J - MCWD Letter 7/25/94 K - Letter of Credit L - Storm Sewer Plan for Kellv Avenue M - Photos N - Letters to City of Orono and John Gerhardson Review of Application Upon receipt of the approval of the Corps of Engineers and the Watershed District, the applicant proceeded with the dredging of a 60’x60’ pond in the street yard of his lakeshore property, not realizing that approval of the City of Orono was also required. Applicant had applied for a conditional use permit for the restoration of a guest house on his property in the summer of 1994. He continued to work on the restoration of the shoreline of his property receiving pemuts from the Watershed District for installation of a sand blanket arid rip rapping of eroding shoreline. He expanded the permit with the Watershed DisLict to include the excavation of the pond in the street yard and was also advised to proceed with the permit process with the Corps of Engineers. Applicant had also been in contact with the City for the past year dealing with the flooding problems of Kelly Avenue and the proposed realignment of his driveway. Driveway improvements involve placing of berms and plantings within the unimproved portions Zoning File #1989 January 11, 1995 Page 2 of the Kelly Avenue right-of-way. Mr. Stoddard had unfortunately assumed that his contact with the Public Works Department had covered any other necessary local government approvals. The building inspector stopped the project and appropriate erosion control measures were taken. Applicant immediately filed the necessary conditional use permit. The area to be excavated is not a designated wetland and is located out of the proposed storm water improvements for Kelly Avenue, review Exhibit L. Gustafson reports that the proposed project will have no negative impact on proposed Kelly Avenue storm water improvements. The area to be excavated is not a protected wetland of either the City, State or Federal authorities. The pond will provide additional retention of runoff within the area. Gustafson cautions about proposed landscaping improvements within the unimproved portion of Kelly Avenue noting that large boulders or trees should not be planted within the right-of-way. John Gerhardson will work with the applicant to ensure that right-of- way is protected. It is doubtful whether the 5’ + high berms will be allowed but this must be resolved by the Public Works Director with the applicant. The pond will be approximately 60 ’x60 ’ and will result in the dredging of some 600 cubic yards ot fill. The excavated fill shall either be used in the grooming of the sides of the pond and fc*- the additional landscaping within the street yard of tlie property. Any remaining fill will be removed from the site. Issues for Consideration Applicant ’s addendum notes the purpose of the creation of a pond is for aesthetics, retention of surface runoff and environmental as site had been previously filled and is covered with purple loostrife. The Engineer confirms that the excavation of the pond will have no impact on the future storm water improvement plans for Kelly Avenue. 1.Do Commission Members have any other concerns, i.e. safety, location of 6 ’ to 8’ pond adjacent to roadway, need for physical barrier? 2.Any issues to address concerning the circumstances of the dredging of the pond without the necessary permit approvals from the City ... Have Plaiuiing Commission Members any further questions to ask of applicant? 3. Any other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action Denial of conditional use permit. If conditional use permit is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in Section 10.09, Sub ’ 6(A). Zoning File #1989 January 11, 1995 Page 3 A.Docs the proposal present conflicts with the standards set forth in the zoning code or the intent and purpose of the Comp Plan? B, Does the proposed improvement pose any hazards to the public health, safety or welfare or will it be detrimental to properties or improvements in the immediate neighborhood? C.Will the proposed improvement have a negative impact on the property values of the neighborhood? Approval of the conditional use permit as proposed subject to the following conditions! A. Applicant to obtain an after-the-fact land alteration permit from the City B Entire disturbed area within the private property and right-of-way of Kelly Avenue to be seeded in the spring. #1CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL’TAND uS e APPLICATI 6.Ww‘W'4,V W'i/VV A ir rr*i V A vA 4.V'- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Ti ~A,'> ■L • Type of Application to be Filed Propert>' Identification Number (P.I.D.) CHECK HECUPT-TimK YDl i:E22600 COOi ROl 71 t ? /•* n o'-117- 23-/<y APPLICANT, I , Name o7 Address ^ l(£LLi. np/MD______^l™ne ( 4 l/7 City n/id/oo Hione (home) i^/^ V 7/* ^Oi Phone (work) Zip nil OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ____£ A/^---- Phone (home) Phone (woric) Address City Zip DatePropeny Acquired IL----/ ^^) ----------------- I (do)C{^ ^) also own the adjacent parcels of lano. fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application S125.00 Residential Accessory Use * $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guesi Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use (month/year) $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain tV" Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from origiwl application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). 2UIR£D SUBMITTALS j2S„ y)Cbmpleted Application Form. 2. rX Describe request in detail. Certifier* Property Owners List of owners within 350 (you can obtain this list from Hennepin Countv Department of Finance, A*603, Government Center, 348-j271). Oh rUi Plat Map. u ^ ^ 5. Oh H<i Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - reter to handout for survey information. 6. DA) r1L'‘y Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. XX Topographic surv'ey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve7. :hanges in elevation (grades). g L^List of the legal names (inciuae maniai saius; oi au pcI^ulli wuu du imcicai m property. This would include narae(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(t). 9. H//)’ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 10. fU/j- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this applic.ition. Oh fni YOU ARE REQUIRED________ FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) vou wish notified of this applic.ition. ........ .^/i, REOUmED TO SUPpLy COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:^__________________________Date---------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE ^ u u -7 • The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required 11 requested by the Zonmg Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incuned in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct^ the ^^sf^his/her knowledge. ... n-n-ifApplicant’s signature OWNER’S SIGNATURE u ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonao entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of Avestip«t5n>pmd verification of this request. Owner’s signamre Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeung. Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at “ review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled mwtmg. please maVe arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zonmg i of this change prior to the meeting. Wtlltam J. SttHiJard .#19 December 19,1994 Ms. Jeanne Mabusih Zoning Department City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Subject; Dear Jeanne: Land Use Application at 2605 Kelly Avenue From your field inspector’s visit and our follow-up meeting this morning, we now understand we were a permit shy in order to proceed with the excavation at my residence, due to miscommunication. We had already obtained Minnebaha Creek Watershed District and Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers Permits, and I was informed that "all other local parties had been informed about this matter." In addition, I had been communicating with Mr. John Gerhardson of Orono (refer to enclosed correspondence) about this and related sueet flooding maters, and I erroneously assumed that I had satisfied City of Orono policy. This mix-up is entirely my responsibility, and enclosed with this letter, please find a General Land Use Application and required information for your review. In summary, last winter we applied for lake shore permits for rip-rapping and a sand blanket from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). These permits were granted and work was performed by an approved contractor. At that time following conversations with the MCWD, we applied for and were granted permits from the MCWD and Corps of Engineers for excavating a portion of my property near Kelly Avenue for reasons of aesthetics; environmentalism, (fill had previously been placed in this portion of this property years ago, and now is home primarily to the exotic "purple loostrife;" and water storage (water routinely floods Kelly Avenue at this location). It is our intent to complete excavation as soon as possible (1/2 day of work) and to have a pretty pond that doubles as a water retention area to help with spring flooding on Kelly Avenue (which makes it virtually impossible to even access our driveway at times) and for local traffic to pass. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612) 471-8088 Fax: (612) 471-0888 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth December 19,1994 ... —-N \ ,'3 No hardcover is affected by our proposal, and please refer to the attached Land Use Application and attachments for additional site specific information. u RAPHIC SURVEY OF ; VACATED 34' OF KELLY AVENUE. ^ONO. ■y. MINNESOTA #■? nS9 I SCT SURVEY MONU4CNT MARKED VD4PER 1M07* ' “ ' SCT P»0ilT ^ OM jJNC * I 1 » i Cl :aphic survey of VACATED 34’ OF KELLY AVENUE. CNO, , MINNESOTA #1989 »l ,• 4 SI3 i> i o i 09 AAOC ATW I TOP) fJlX.SET SURVEY UONUUCNT MARKED ‘KEMPER 18A07*draft It Of \\ “ hifkt Unwtm Ot (j>rrHit^ A /? /^ /^Joym » t HA/TA v<»< if I Bonestroo Rosene Andcflik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 6, 1995 gc--nrfm Ananlik M AsuxiMi. IK a in Opponi.nty ernptcj^ Oro G Bunggoc PE Eoi^ w aosene PE • jcseoh C ArxJe^'k- PE L Sorvj** PE Pch-Jid E Turner P£ Gierm 9 Cook PE Fhomej E h*05«. PE fkjoevi G Schuncht PE Susjn M EDertei C P.^ -Senor Comucam HoM«aid A SjnioKl PE Ketin A Gofdorv PE i«ooert 9 P9ef^tr*e P£ Ptchaej w Foster PE O u»i«xa PE Rooen C Eusse*. AiA Jerry A BOiMSOn PE M»« A Mjmor^ PE Mcnae* T Raumrvi PE K F«I(1 PE Tho»»»a» * ArxJerson A i a Oor\jid C BurgM. PE A PE J Stenoorg. PE ismaet Mamnez. PE Mctiaei P Bau PE Agnes M Bmg AiC P Thomas W ^lenoa PE C Lynch PE j^nes 9 Maiand PE Jerry 0 ^rwh. PE Scoo J Aiganet. PE Kenneth P ArxiersofV PE t Ml PE Mar* A See PE Gary W Monen PE Paui J Ganrxxs. A i A Oan«i i Edgerton. PE A Pic * SchmidL PE Phiie J Casvwei PE M^O VMi Pf Maes B Jensen PE L Ph«p Gra*el PE Kawrt L W«men. Pf Gary O KnmafO. PE Keen R raoa PE Douglas J BerxM. PE Sha«*n O Gusuflorv PL. Cecao Ov«r. PE Paul G Hfuec PE John P GdOpr Pf Charles A Ercmon Leo M PM«tsfcy Hartvs M Ohon James F EngePs aet Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Stoddard Pond File No. 139-1989 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposal to create an open water pond at 2605 Kelly Avenue, h does not appear that this location is a wetland. The applicant has received a^rovals from both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Corps of Engineers^ PJlTnv pond is acceptable from an engineermg standpoint The pond will have no impact on y proposed drainage improvements in the area. The applicant proposes “P ° ’ of fill with landscaping within the City’s right-of-way for KeUy Avenue. No bo“lde^ trees or structures of any kind should be placed within the ^ ^ l,.j encroachment must be approved by the PubUc Works Director. The entire disturbed area should be seeded in the spring. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. J). Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. cc:John Gerhardson, Public Works Director 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY tnnRHSnCETEAST ST. mu. MN S6I01-1SM S«pt«nber 16» 1994 (■(pi.TTe•nwnanv Conatruction-Op«rations Regulatory (94-05621-MW-JJY) Mr. William Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 ^1080 \ Dear Mr. Stoddard: We have reviewed information about your project to dredge 0.08 acre from an unnamed wetland to create a compensation area. The project site is in the MB 1/4 Sec. 20, T. 117N., R. 23W., Hennepin Ccunty, Minnesota. This work is eligible for authorisation by a Department of the Army nationwide permit referenced below and described in the enclosures, provided the enclosed conditions are followed. This determination covers only your project as described above. If the design, location, or purpose of the project is changed, you should contact us to make sure the work %rauld not result in a violation of Federal law. It is your responsibility to ensure that the «rork complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AMD APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE WORK. If you have any questions, contact Mr. Joe Yanta in our St. Paul office at (612) 290-5362. Sincerely, \ \Vw \ Ben Wopat Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosure(a) Determination: 33 CFR 330-Appendix A (26) ■M ^ ■Tj WATERSHED DISTRICT 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597 ofncv: (f 12J §3*4320 »§■: {§t2) W*43** Oani>CTMae§iniATOH:EfcrB Sonw tOUIDOf "Rwr*!Jf .Pm.*C.WfcOC'(CwLow C'artM«<U4to«TboiBi*W Laflouty*ItemsHartte «PatraiaG sac July 25, 1994 vi-iw Mr. William Stoddard 2605 Kolly Avenue Orono, W 55331 ■jf i* v-N t A ' J- .* V C' -* \A--'-- r ' * re: 100-YEAR floodplain remedial wow, 2605 KELLY AVENUE, CITY OF OROMO (CARMAN BAY, LAKE MINNETONKA) Dear Mr. Stoddard: TO. BOUd VOt«J to ““P*^ r^rJd Jtalt . Stt«: of cr«Jit in th. Mount of $2,500 to insure the completion of the vork. PlM.. contact M .houXd you h.v. any qu..tion. concrnlng thu matter. Sincerely, Ellen B. Sones District Administrator c;Jim Smith, Concept Landscaping Premier _ • >. ■ ?<»«»vviuiEn4:AnAvr.rj«J€ • I A f . . ... • • • .» jx -« rS O ^±f 1 >*',) r -> ioreTiiks^ V i' AI7A777 7700 M/J'l f W(X.i>. Mif*tiLSOfA *‘*^109 K,<f Kttlfn TOIC 301 CfNTMAi A.CruJC ■ .cn^^' Mf4 5A1^» r.ir.*403.34il» nr^ w Mir;>*wi«V m ww) July 19. 1994 7lSI !l«^»MPtFf WHiTf BCAH IAkF *.V4 S&nC ft*? rano Leiter of Credit #365 Issued in fiivor ol* Minnehaha Creek Watershed Disiricl 14600 Minneiialia Blvd. Minnetonka. MN 55435-1597 *. Ann: Ellen Somes Dear Ms. Somes: Premier Bank hereby establishes its leiter of credit in your favor for the account of William J, Stoddard in the aggiegate amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($2,500»00) , available by your diafts shown at sight on Premier Bank. *, ‘ Premier Bunk hereby agrees with bonafide holders that all .drafts drawn under and iii compliance with the terms of this credit shall be duly honori^ on presentation and ddivery of rlooimeirts as specinerl to the drawee if drawn and negotiated on or before July 19, 1995. The aggregate amount dr.'twn on this credit .shall not exceed $2,500.00. This credit becomes "void if not used on or before July 19,1995 Your negotiations of any draft or drafts under this letter of credit shall be considered a guaranty to Premier Bank and that the terms, and conditions expressed therein haye bwn. fulfilled. \ Unle.ss iiiherwise espiessly stated, tliis letter of credit is Subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice f<*r Dncumeniary Credits. I.C. Publication No. 500^1993 Reyision)- (Note - (of the ■ purposes of applying said UCP Standards, Premier Bank shall be governed by the reflations applying to Issuing banks). • Sincerely, / . / : ' • • * ?. • l • • •••• I 1.. t Seim O. Regan , 1 President. Premier Bank Ro.sevilic • .., SOR/pm *• \ ** •• • .* . I ! STORM WATER DRAINAGE ORONO, MINNESOTA KELLY AVENUE Scolt in FIGURE^# 1 '9 8 8 Bon9«troo Rosano Anderllk 4 Associates • • V V. V-' - '«• H&W-. 1 >/» ■ '•'i:.- « •» «v7 7.* ' •"* J *7^ View towards road with recommended compensation area to the left, and water ponding area/wetland across Kelly Avenue. fT. • L - ^ ’Mi'j4 ^ .^c ^ -TT' > 7 V, IIVW"/ J'* • 1 rA»-',? v,' 5 > ^ . 4 _ _ ^______ - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Close-up of water ponding area/wetland across Kelly Avenue. William J. Stoddard _ nCOPY September 27,1994 Mr. John Gerfaardson Public W(wks Director Qty of Orono Crystal Bay. MN 55323 #198Pi Subject:Landscaping & Driveway Improvements at 2605 Kelly Avenue Dear John: Per our previous discussion you requested me to submit a preliminary sketch for my roadside improvements. I intend to make various improvements for safety as well as aesthetic reasons. By relocating my driveway outlet somewhat, I will not be driving directly into the roadway pond which comes and goes throughout the year. In summary, the work in the right-of-way area will consist of re-locating the drive outlet, along with landscaping consisting of small rocks, binder-rock/mulch, some shrubs and hosta varieties and tulips. I intend to Place the closest landscaping no closer than ten (10) feet from the road (which is still farther from the road than most homes in the area) and keep safety in mind by not utilizing any large rocks. 1 hope my project meets with your sq)proval, and you find it as pleasing as our neighbors and we do. Sincerely, 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612)471-8088 Fax: (612)471-0888 k -■’'■.“a • '• -^-r frr n - ua COPY July 14,1993 Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 #19 Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear John: It was a pleasure speaking with you today about our problems with the standing water in front of our homes on Kelly Avenue. As we said, the warm, dry season doesn't appear to be coming which has somewhat taken care of this problem in past years. Instead, there has been up to one foot of standing water in the road which has resulted in cars getting stuck in an attempted "shortcut" over my lawn, resulting in tow trucks ripping up more of my yard. We cannot get to our mail boxes except by four wheel drive, and on one occasion, guests had their car flooded as the water came up over the sill in their car door, resulting in a sprained ankle when abandonment was necessary. I could go on but my intention is not to gripe, but to hopefully propose and be part of the solution. In our discussions, 1 understand a costly alternative consists of a storm sewer which would mean both allot of time, and money assessed to homeowners. I would like to propose a quicker, less costly fix which would consist of raising the road slightly in the affected area. Please review our concerns and let us know if there is anything else we may do to help you take care of the water ponding problems. Sincerely, William J. Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono, MN 55331 J * -j N William J, Stoddard Mav 16. 1994 Mr. John Gerhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear John: Per our last discussion you requested me to summarize various problems we’ve encountered with the water problems on Kelly Avenue for your report. As one of the main property owners affected due to my driveway access. I urge expedient road repair before someone is injured due to faulty car brakes which are affected tremendously when driven through one foot of water. This can potentially result in a huge liability to Orono of which you knew of previously, however haven't yet remedied. -Cars have stalled in the middle of the road for hours; -Our newspapers get randomly delivered, and then usually wet. I can only retrieve it with my vehicle; -Our mail is wet every day and sometimes illegible due to cars splashing it; -Our yard gets wrecked from both water ponding and cars driving over our property trying to avoid as much of the pond on the road as possible; -Three instances have been r;ported to me plus my experience of nearly having an auto accident because our vehicles brakes have been affected from driving through the water. The brakes get so saturated, that it takes nearly four times the distance to stop. By this letter, I am notifying you of your party to this danger and liability; -On one occasion, a tow truck was necessary to remove a vehicle stuck in the mud in my yard as they tried to avoid the road; -Water has entered more than a few cars from the door sill of visitors. Sometimes they do not even attempt to come up my drive, either electing to park at my neighbors, or not stop altogether; -I have witnessed over 100 vehicles elect to make a U-tum in the middle of the road than to drive through the water. As you can see, this is not only a nuisance, but what I believe a potentially huge liability for the city of Orono. Please take my comments constructively, as I believe there arc a number of really good things the Public Works department is involved with. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612)471-8088 Fax: (612)471-0888 0 1 L,.... COPY William J, Stoddard April 29,1994 Orono City Council Mr. Charles Kelly 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 ’LL O, O '-n Ti -i- "1 ' P ^'U Subject:Water Problems on Kelly Avenue Dear Council Member: I would like to sincerely request your help in obtaining the resources for the City of Orono to raise the road on a portion of Kelly Avenue which is annually flooded. The water on the road in front of my house is well over one foot deep. I am sure you do not wish to hear repeated problems associated with this flooding, however, I have enclosed two letters to the City Public Works Department which summarized numerous conversations and no results to-date. Our beautiful City of Orono contains many great roads and I am proud of the way they are maintained and the results of our Public Works Department. I feel they should be commended for a great job done overall. Unfortunately, the flooded part of Kelly Avenue which is adjacent to my home makes it impossible for certain vehicular traffic to my home. 1 encourage you to drive on it soon and formulate your own opinions. In the mean time, I place my hopes and confidence in your hands. Please review my concerns and let me know what you can do to help. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or if I may be of assistance. My day telephone number is 595-8888. cc: Mr. Edward J. Callahan, Jr. 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. .Minnesola 55331 Telephone: (612)471-8088 Fax: (612)471-0888 WUliam I Stoddard COPY iH April 29. 1994 Mr. John Gcrhardson Public Works Director City of Orono Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 /; th •I . S Subject: Dear John: Continued Water Problems on Kelly Avenue J .< John, I must say I had hoped that the water problems on Kelly Avenue would have been taken care of by this spring. I understand you do not have the resources to fix every problem which pops up from timc-to-time, but the flooding on Kelly Avenue is a reoccurring problem. The water is now over one foot deep by my mailbox and driveway entrance. In addition to the marsh which is the source of this water, the storm sewer adds water to the problem periodically, as evidenced by water streaming from the top of the manhole. I hope you will devote your attention to remedy the problem by raising the road in this area as soon as possible. I have enclosed a copy of my letter to you from last summer. I have been very patient with your efforts to date. I wonder how patient Orono's "tax collector" is? In addition, I intend to change the course/elevation of my driveway and it would be very helpful to know your decisions and anticipated dates for follow-through. Please review my concerns and let me know when you will take care of the flooding problem. Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or if I may be of assistance. My day number is 595-8888. 2605 Kellv Asenuo Oiono. Minncsoia Telephone: (6I2> 47I-.S(18.S Fa\: (612) 47I-088X © A*-. V ACKNOWLEDGMENT As kmg as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excaviue at 2605 Kelly Avenue oonforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Depaitnwnt Of The Army/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting aj^Hoval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Marne: -175 tz. K X C Signature: Printed Name: K ^ Address: r~ ' «rn •“rvr fF.'- ACKNOWLEDG]7,1 'j: As kmg as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Mtaiiciiaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Corps Of Engmeers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono grantiiig approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. ■ rJAj< 4Signature: Primed Name<^l< I £7 ft Address: 1 • «<ro«r ..V u'r*v:^r-L^iai&s:£re~^: ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard propcraes to excavate at 260S Kelly Avenue ctmfonns to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Cotps Of Engineers, and Orono Pnmit Conditions, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps scHiiewhat with water letection to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature •7^ Printed Name: Address: 2567 K»Ur A f Exatlator w: S5251 ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as ihc pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue confonns to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Department Of The Army/Coeps Of Eitgineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orooo granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the Hooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: ' t Printed Name: ^ A Addresb: ^ ./> 7 (j . //( j ^ ^ s>l ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue coaforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Anny/Coqis Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favor of Orooo granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce die flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: Printed Name/^ |^C^3 Address: AiTgS' |5 / ^ f: ACKNOWLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard pioposes to excavate at 2603 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/C(H7» Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditions, we are in favtM- of Orono granting apfnoval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: Printed Name: Address: Aa »WLEDGMENT As long as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavttfe at 260S Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Department Of The Army/Cbips Of Engineers, and Orono Fermit Conditioos, we are in favor of Orono granting approval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. :U)Signature V I/' ■' V'Printed Nai^: \ r | ^ Address: ^ t fj L*C. »') i' q ACKNOWLEDGMm* As kmg as the pond Mr. Bill Stoddard proposes to excavate at 2605 Kelly Avenue conforms to Minnehaha Credc WMershed District, Depaitment Of The Anny/Corps Of Engineers, and Orono Permit Conditioos, we are in favor of Orono granting ^iproval. We hope this helps somewhat with water retention to reduce the flooding on Kelly Avenue. Signature: JL'-jJr-yx —V. ^ Printed Name: Si Ji^7/ ^/V/ / /// //V^r c cx/^) X Address:/ /' O 'Ca. I ^ jL ': dt-'> / Sf7. ),^ I ^o iUd To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator January 12, 1995 #1991 Clair Rood, 2525 Shadywood Road - Commercial Site Plan Review Public Hearing Zoning District: B-4 Total area of property = 31,275 s.f. Required = 20,000 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3. Section 10.43, Subdivision 2 - All applications for building permits within the commercial district shall be reviewed by both the Planning Commission and Council. Property owners within 350 ’ have been notified of this review. Section 10.43, Subdivision 3 (B) - Permitted uses. The proposed professional office building is a permitted use. Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (B). A. Lot Area. Minimum area required = 20, Gross area = 31,275 s.f. Adjusted area * 25,275 s.f. (6, OOO s.f. 000 s.f. of access and utility easement area must be deducted from buildable area) 4. 5. B Lot Width Required = 100 ’ Existing = 125’ Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (C & D) - Front yards and rear yards. A. Front Yard Required = 20 ’ Proposed = 20 ’ for an access drive to north, 50’ for parking B.Rear Yard Required = 30 ’ Proposed = 50’ parking setback Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (E) - Structural setback requirement. A. Front Setback Required = 35’ Proposed = 49’ Zoning File #1991 January 12, 1995 Page 2 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. B Rear Setback Required = 35’ Proposed = 82’ C.Right/Northwest Side Setback Required = 15’ Proposed = 46’ D.Left/South Side Setback Required = 15’ Proposed = 38’ Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (F) - Required fencing. The B-4 Zoning District ends at the rear (west) lot lines of Lots 1 and 2. A fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 50% opaque and no less than 6’ in height will be erected along the rear lot lines. Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (G) - Building design and construction. Refer to Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (G). Approved exterior wall finishes on building. Building is to be a one-story plus walkout level to south, wood framed, with a full brick veneer. Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (H) - Drainage calculations have not been provided although only Lot 1 is to be developed. Final grades will direct the majority of runoff from this site to the southwest comer. Because of the sensitive drainage system at the Marsh of Lafayette where drainage will eventually flow, it will be imperative that on-site retention by provided so that developed residential properties will be protected. Note (review Exhibit L) the majority of the drainage from the developed site will be directed away from the Kelly Avenue watershed. Section 10.43, Subdivision 6 (I) - Height. Allowed height = 30’ Proposed 26Vi’ measured to the mean or average distance between the highest point of the peak and the ceiling joist of upper level at the low or south side of walkout. Section 10.61, Subdivision 6 (F) - Parking stall size. Required = 9’ x 20’ Proposed = 9’ x 18’ Variance required. Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (B) - Required side setback for parking. Allowed = 3’ Proposed = 25’ Side = 12’ (based on 18’ parking stall length shown on plan) Note parking stalls open out onto lot line. Zoning File #1991 January 12, 1995 Page 5 to Carman Cove. Approximately 9 of these acres drain directly to the tile system while the runoff from the remaining 37 acres ponds in the wetland area located in Lot 3. The wetland has a storage capacity of approximately 2.75 acre-feet. When the capacity is exceeded, the wetland floods across Kelly Avenue to the west to the drain tile system. During the 1978 subdivision review it was noted that drainage from the development of this subdivision must be directed to the southeast comer of the property and away from Kelly Avenue. Now with the Marsh at Lafayette subdivision, the property is no longer just an open vacant area but is now residemially developed and the sending of uncontrolled amounts of mnoff to the site may have a major impact on that developntent. It will be unperative that retention be provided on this site. Applicant’s engineer must provide the necessary hydraulic information to ensure the protection of the Marsh at Lafayette development. Sewer and water assessments have been paid for Lots 1 and 2. Each lot has been assessed two sewer and two water units. Issues for Consideration 1.The County should review all access proposals to this site. In the earlier review it appeared that the County would have no problem with a shared access at the shared lot lines of Lots 1 and 2. If all access to the site is via one access, then are we dealing with a private road? 2.The parking layout must be redesigned so that an access roadway is not located to the immediate rear of the parking stalls. Remember Lot 3 can be developed as a duplex unit. The use of the road will be intensified. Access cannot be achieved via Kelly because of the wetland. Parking stalls must be redesignated at 9’ x 20*. 3.Loading berth should be required and designated on plan. What is ^Planning Commission ’s recommendation concerning net fl^«- area for building - to cwt^ needs for one story use or two story use? ' 4.Concrete curb and gutter should be designated on plan for the direction of the drainage. Retention on site must be provided for fully developed property. 5.Should the applicant be asked to consider combining properties and developing an office complex with parking on one comprehensive site? 6. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. 1 Zoning File #1991 January 12, 1995 Page 6 Options of Action To »Jeny application is proposed, advising applicant Uiat the City cannot consider variances to the required standard for new development and constmction; OR Table application, providing applicant additional time to reconsider the issues raised by the Planning Commission and staff and to provide an amended proposal to be reviewed at the next meeting. r, CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^ ^ - ir‘i 001 Type of Application to be Filed_____ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICANT ^ ^ Name CLa*^ *7^. ’TTctj-tP' y<-3fcSa»S ?• 'V 3-c - //7 - // 0O1O Phone (home) 91/- fS f Phone (work) '■ " Address ^f ^ City Zip ^ 1 f f OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name ---- Phone (home) Phone (work) Address Citv Zip Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels ojHand FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$125.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments mi $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$250.00 Vacation _____$175.00 Easement Vacation _____$ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule (month/vear) rrry i*r roi-»;nWA I f Uy-jzvvm Qi CEH 2Ci CHECK Ti 20C RECEIFT-lHm YC K322990 Ci'Oi ROi i 12/ »« » PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District /.j'~ / Present Use of Property Lof 7 Residential 6 Other (specify) /V . t * f « SnTTALS Ictcd Application Form. miS Lis. or owners within 350' (you can obuin Uiis list from ean^'>in County Deparimeni of Finance. A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). pla; Map-renincate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach lesal description to application if not mcluded on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital sams) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construcuon plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. VoL' ARE required to SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY for REPRODUCTIO.V (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all djcuments, plans, etc. to be submitted.) ,The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your ■ application is not complete if the above information has not been included. 2." ,,1. ■v. ■ -I ‘ - t Ceniflcation by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date It ^APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tnie and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.'.r. y Applicant ’s signature •i ‘ f lira t h:i t bate OWNTR’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner ’s signature Date 5“ *"7^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Apj'’ic,<nts must be present at all scheduled review meetings o* the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant la unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. t t *- a w *• -m ^ VV %2-_3 .. *.l ■ >W-- ;j»44; •.■<:»% ♦ ♦#19 V" , .§^ « •♦ wiw !.. -*‘ :'Sji>- - CLAIR ROOD PROPERTIES / P.O. BOX 248 / MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55391 V Ph. 471-8548 / Fax 471-7444 December 19, 1994 ■T I * City of Orono Building and Zoning 2750 Kelley Parkway Excelsior, MN 55331 RE: Site A.ddress ~ 2525 Shadyvood Request for office building to be built on the site located at 2525 Shadywood. Building to be 120' x 42*. • y i «. I t* ♦’•45 \ ,4* * 4- •' i*. ty . »• v’v » ^ 7. . 't. */ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ wood frame building with a full brick veneer. -4 *;• > Building to be a one story plus walk-out level, »• • , , ,. I «. . 4^^ £• • et*-* ** y»- K ■ ' « k -«->• . t • • ‘ •I’" . V ’ ^ .'-I'- ' ikTi-S. . V; 4«yi'•k ' • .1 -! * 1 T T; •.•iJr-i* • V'*^ ' V V .. , Y ♦.. .*/;•*' -k.A .44* « -4** *,- .4 ’ ‘ 4 , ‘ ' ' . t. ^ . i ■ Wt . ..................... • %r^: A. A.. «• • # i^Ae* W. 1^?^- t -4 I '■' ( t .. * , V •• iee ' ^ V. J5C?. «HNT i4 * •" -'r k .<•> fO‘ ' • ri'"* ■ ■■■ bi .■ !■ r,i - ' 1. /•■M' '' mh ■ ■* *i» ♦ V\ RUN DAT! IZA^k/n BATCH 501 '••4 fv * \ \:i4;:/ *ERIN COUNTY RRORCRTY INPORnATIQN SYSTEM RHORCRTY OMIERS LIST RTRORT NO. RIAS540I RAGCPROP AMm OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NA»«/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TA>0»AYER ^ NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAm TAXPAYER KIME/ADDR SB W-117-IS 11 OOOS 0E50S LYOIARO AVE CLENDON J OLSON CLENDON OLSON 2505 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR m 55SS1 t; I S'. 50 20-117-25 11 0021 02545 LYOIARO AVE V M EUXOTT TRUSTEE VALERIA M ELLIOTT ^ < 2545 LYOIARO AVE NAVARRE m *55592 50 20-117-25 11 0027 02477 SNAOYNOOO RO. DUANE N HALL DUANE N NALL 17005 CRESTLINE HUMBLE TX 77594 - . 7^. 4 < i * ^ .i. Jr - i % ' . ■ * f • ^ V ♦ >• % .« 50 20-117-25 11 000402595 LYOIARO AVf PEE LENOXPHILIP A ELIZABETH LENOX RT 1 NAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 *fi. .* -t*•' T— . ♦** ».s M to-nr*ts 11 oetz 0252S KELLY AVE C E A H C TKOVAK CHARLES E TmVAK 2525 KElLEY AVE EHCEUXOR rtl 55SS1 ’1 ’■ ■' * ., / -A**' fu..». .-tJ.'/ 38 * 20-117-23 11 0028 02535 SNAOYNOOO RO ■ ^ OEANNA H LEACH I'*; . CLAIR ROOD 9 ; •r » • :>r .• * ■ \ 7 hayzata,mn '■ * ,T A „ . * • ■ • •* i • >«A • i^. V 'vA/'AA-itv V 38* 20-117-23 11 OOSO.V- i 11 0031 02525 SHADYNOOO RO ^ M ^ '• 'S 02AA5 SMADYNOOO RO DEANNA H LEACH - y' 'vV^*^ Vw." . 1ST NATL 8K Of NAVARRE CLAIR ROOD .. .V * • 1ST NATL 8K OF NAVARRE 2215 KEIMOOO NAY ‘ i»* >: J?’ V P 0 80X 123 NAY2ATA Ml 55391 H .»• t »' V'M'. '■•o ’•.V »■ ! ' .r 50 20-117-25 i: 02500 SNAOYHCX UNIVERSITY or M! REGENTS U or M>n SHOPS BUILDINGt 519 15TN AVE S I MPLS MN 55455 50 20-117- 02415 LYOIARO CIR 0054 ^ V ‘V W >0-117-25 11 0050 " r >- • ' ! 50 20-117-25 11 0007 02540 KELLY AVE KIRK R NELSON KIRK K NELSON 2540 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 50 20-117-25 11 0025 0254S KELLY AVE R H PONZETTI ABA PONZETTI mOERT H/BAtmSMk A PONZETTI 2545 KELLY AVf EXCELSIOR MN 55551 50 20-117-25 11 0029 i 02545 SHAOYNOOO RO ,( OEANNA M LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENHOOD MAY NAYZATA MN 55591 50 20-117-25 11 0052 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIONED 1ST NATL BANK OP NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OP NAVARRE P O BOX 125 NAVARRE MN 55592 * h..;>,1.■>.«■ /'■ V '■ yy(_ • ; t ^ »• ■. - »•> •.. i:. !* i i>i \ * I'.’ ‘ P V'*«« V. . * ’Si •c > >f- -■ n DZ815 LYDIARD CZR ~ ••^ J' 02425 LYOIARO RVE . raCHACL L GILBERTSON ET HILLIAMS ET.AL^V * 02490 KELLY AVE J R 4 S L VOLKMAR JOHN R 4 SHERRY AVE L VOLKHM • / ,? c •. i' Mis .'V-V RUN OATR BATtH SOI 7/vNCItCRXN COUNTY RRORfRTV XNFORHATXON SYSTtH REPOrr NO. RXAS5A01 ' *>} PROPERTY 0»tCRS UST PACE t PtOP ADM OHNEP MAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB ZB-117-ZS IB 0018 02AE0 REUY AVE GINGER t PRXTCNARO GINGER L SCOTT 2AE0 REUY AVE EKCELSXM m 55351 * ‘ % i' ’ t j >% C‘ •V. .1 ^ ^ - - V r ^ - > so »-HT-fS lA OOIY 025*5 KELLY AVE EVERETT J SCNROEOER E J SCNROEOER tS*5 KELLY AVt EXCELSXOR NN 55X51 -' y 38 20-117-25 lA 0020 02565 KEUY AVE ALEDA C DMCH AtEOA C BURCN 2555 EEUY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55551 •\ * PROP AOM ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAhE/ADM 20-117-25 1* 0021 • < •...KS<s;VVv.-;:. ■ A.-."," iV-A * .* > ■ 58 02587 KELLY AVE LEONORA R HITCNELL HRS 0 F HXTCHELL 2587 KELLY AVE EXCELSXOR HN 55551 V 'V ..4 < % ,A • ( 58 20-117-25 1* 0022 >. 02*05 KELLY AVE W A^*'' * 4* NILUAN J STOOOARO HXLLXAH J STOOOARO 2*05 KELLY AVE EXCELSXOR fM 55551 58 20-117-25 1* 0025 02C5 KELLY AVE J n EUGSTER A C N EUCSTER JACK EUGSTER/CAROL H EUGSTtR 2*55 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55551 } • • » V • : ^ir^l ^ PROP ADM ONNER NAHC TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR i , 1. ?'*. v'^‘-s *»'• V .i ^ *• * .V58 20-117-25 1* 002* 02*25 KELLY AVE • jK . KURT NEJEZCHLE8A ET At"»' fv Vfc KURT A CHRISTA NEJE2CMLE8A ^T • r 2*25 KELLY AV >' f ‘1 EXCELSIOR HN 55551 ‘ V o * 4 : .. :•> ■ A.T- *• - • -• ‘ ^ ■ V 58 : 21-117-25 22 0011 02570 LYOXARO AVE T A RYAN A P J RYAN THOHAS A RYAN. . . 2 HACLYNN RO EXCELSXOR »tl 55551 4 . ^ 58 21-117-25 22 0012 02*5* LYOXARO AVE 0 H HCCUSKEY A C F NCCI^EY OAVIO H A COmXE F HCCUSKEY 2*3* LYOXARO AVE EXCELSXOR Itl 55551 a-■'VI. : ‘ ^.‘-V •• .V CD J >T;.r •• rf.V 7*;? -4. PROP AOOR 0»MER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR • n “ *! • ‘.*> •«* .». .i t - V V • A .V‘; • » a--. • TOTAL BATCH 501 00027 *: ?*>- r e •> * V'*. . .. V • .» I k . ■. ■ 1 9 ■v'.j A ..:,T • . *:l- ... {.'.if , ' ■ V • ’ • • » . • > . ‘ ♦ i 7 • i4 ‘ V. . • V • ;-'vr . .• »«' . - .•<? •7-rO ’.••• » » ^ . ’‘'"X'-- ■ * *'T;‘." -REPRESENTAT . •,Vi.;.•/•• , oF:TME henn _ CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF XNFORHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST LE06E AND BELIEF .V- ■ r r 'MIM i GfSJ f / V f^^k) * > /••. ••TJ^t TST P 100. c«57 lA ^»*» •b / 4 >••••/. <..s /..._ 26) / / --•••,2 J3L ® (3*1) lan ^ $ %• . (25) 8 4 / • *'» ♦ ■ • SESOLUnON NO. ^32 A tZSOLUnON APFROV1N6 THE LEACH ADDITION VHEKZAS, the City of Oroio la a nmlelpal eorperaelen organized and aaclaclng under the lawa of the State of Mlnneaota; and VHEXEAS, the City Council of the City of Orono haa adopted aubdiviaion regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council haa considered the application for a subdivision plat by Thomas Leach the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: I • Dedication of required drainage and utility easements. Dedication of public streets and roads. Dedication of open space and flowage conservation eas< Payment of a park dedication fee of 91*572.00 -j Creation of a private driveway and utility easement across / ta. Lot 1 to serve Lot 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Leach Addition* Hennepin County, Mlnneaota; subject to the following conditions: The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before March 1, 1979* together with a certified original copy of this Resolution, and executed copies of the^ofaln^e and utility easeaimt documgnt flowage and conservation'easooeiVC duo driveway and utility easement document luiu ent y and-prtv The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event* it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for sxabdivision review. Dated this day of ;iriam B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: EA§D®rr 1979f and la aada and executed by Thomas C. Leach and Deanna M. Leach, husband and wife, (hereinafter "Grantors.*’) V17KESSETH: Vhereas, Grantors are the owners of certain real property situated In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally de­ scribed as: Lota 1, 2 and 3. Block 1. Leach Addition, according to the plat thereof on file in and for said Hennepin County. •t H.'e r* \ f* * * . T V -X* »'»'^j«<Whereaa,' Grantors have agreed asa‘condition to obtaining final plat approval from the City of Orono that appurtenant easement of ingress and egress over and across Lot 1 to the benefit of Lot 3: Mow, therefore. Grantors hereby grant and convey a perma­ nent casement for roadway and utility purposes over, under and across the northerly_2A jeet of Lot 1, Block 1, Leach Addition measured parallel to the northerly property line of Lot 1, Clock 1, Leach Addition. This easement is for the benefit of and appur’.enant to that certain real property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 3. Block 1, Leach Addition. The easeswnt described herein shall run with the land, and shall be for the benefit and use of the owners of Lot 3, Block 1, Leach Addition, their heirs and assigns. GRANTORS: % f i:; ■^1: r •i.t' t. - . #4 I * * f . i nr HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlrfl 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnasota 553^ * • 935-3381 February 9. 1978 rpip f > n? ri’^f Jli r db i 1 rj’'.7f3 "1^ ViLL^GF. 0? CI^GKO Mr. Henry F. Huhfch Zoning A^lnlstrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, m 55323 Dear Mr. Muhich RE:Proposed Plat - “teach Addition* CSAH 19 - West Side 100 feet north of Lydiard Ave. Section 20, Tounshlp 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 622 Review and Reconnendatlons Thank you for submitting this plat for our review. Vte ftviewcd the preposcd plat and have the following coiments: 1.Dedicate, for roadway purposes, an additional 7 feet of right of way for a total of 40 feet from and along the centerline of CSAH 19. 2.The proposed access location for Lots 1 and 3 Is acceptable. An approved entrance permit 1$ required before beginning access con­ struction. Permit forms are available from our Traffic Division. 3.An entrance permit will also be required for any future access from LOt 2 to CSAH 19. We recoflinend that before the City approves site development plans for Lot 2, the developer contact our Traffic Division fur access approval. 4.All other propos^ construction or alterations within County right of way must receive County Engineer approval before beginning con­ struction. This Includes, but Is not limited to, drainage a^ util­ ity construction (requires utility permits), trail development, and landscaping. HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oDponunity employer ♦ * P it <»* * T r •, .. ^ 1 a M ] ft i i i • r u h -<9 ■U ■I •••rT;, 'V . *• “. ft 5. The developer Rwst restore all disturbed during construction. .i’V areas within County right of way Please direct any response or questions Mattson at this office. on the above connents to Douglas Sincerely / M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Progrannlng OMW: OBM; bg -ypi . "K ‘ ^ • ' # f. 4.P-' - " k * • •.* * • t V- •t,c • t •# t ‘4 O': X/jI *4 ^ 'N- yfi rvJ^ 1 - ■> - .»k V ' -r 14 3 3 A — *1 5 Bonestroo Rosene Anclerlilc& Associates Engineers A Architects Otto G tuiiggpn ^ HatK*r ^ * Joseph C Anoerwi PE MjrveiL SorvM PE fichjid E \imef PE Glenn 9 Cook PE Thohvis E 'Vios^ ilsdeti G SchurchL PE M EDenm C PA •Vn«r Const tern Januaiy 6, 1995 HOMV0 A SenM PE HWf» A Gatfon PE ■OOert 9 metl^ PE ihcheid ^ Power p£ 0»nd O LOWDCa. PE ■oben C tunet. A i A Jerry A SouHlOh PE Mjrt A Mjrrion. PE ■Vichje« T Kauvnann. PE >a K F«id. PE Thomas t Andenor s AiA OonaiO C Surgardt PE Thomas Syflni PE Fffoenc J Sienooig. PE hmaer Martmet PE MKhaeiP «au. PE Agnes M ling A>CP Thomas VI/ Pnenors. PE lAcnier C Lynch. PE James t MaiandL PE Jerry O Perpi ch PE Scon J Aaganen PE Kenneth p Anderson Pf M«k t IDPS. PE Mam A See PE Gary W Monen PC PaU J Garmorv A i A Oan«« J Edgerton PE A Etcll SchTTMOL PE preo J Caswwee PE M«t O MMR. Pf Mies B Jrnwn. Pf L Phep Graaei. Pf Mrs L Pf Gary O Knwa^ PE Keep t sapo PE OOM^as J Benoc Pf 9vaMm O Guflahom PE CecAo OiMet P€ PeaG Hruet. Pf jorws p Goeet. P£ Charto A fhcfcipn Lfo M Paweisky Hanan M Onon James f Enge«haei Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 K •JAN 9 1995 Re: Rood Commercial Site Plan File No. 139-1991 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed site plan for two commercial office buildings and a residential duplex on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Leach Addition. The plan shows the office buildings with a shared parking lot and one access out to Shadywood Road (Co. Rd. 19). A typical commercial site plan would have a separate access and parking lot for each lot. The commercial buildings and parking lots do not ai pear to meet setback requirements. The access to the duplex is through the parking lot and sh<i.red commercial access. The City Code allows that a two unit duplex may be served by a shared driveway. However, this driveway must be separated from the commercial access and parking lots. «50u.'f^ ^ , 'Tl.’ The proposed drainage on the site is directed to the noi theast to an existing culvert. This concept is acceptable. Drainage calculations should be provided for the site. A storm water sediment pond may be needed near the oor^ast comer of the site due to the increase in hardcover. The proposed access location appears to have adequate site distance but must be reviewed by Hennepin County. The County may need additional right-of-way along Shadywood Road (42-feet recommended). Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 It- ' ' CO » « • « * # t •0(1 • •« (1C) «V ^ u • . V :•.. %oil> 2 •••• ••••N 1 s 1?) s i* :V] V.. rti.v- .T • *./ • » ?! UKOOt OM 900 l-rr—^»3.- ---^•Ttf'f«.?»:*/'^rt , f \ k A -ItiUA ' •• % . *- 1 i •>:t*i^>-.- wV * Jf 4/ , «T ' • - ^ ^ '"! '■i'* i l4d^9#fik .‘I ; * s- • *^'1^1 WATCRUAtN ON PROf>CRTV UNC COMC. lur. h>. ; • ■ i‘K'- ur •l * g -g «#»-' cv a Ttc ir 5 lcao t*<irAt-e^n^ /? j};»„. ,»r 7”• g.A # •• r • N 1 ______i_ _ _ •*, L^C vjv; •■.■’’• r ’• ’ -"t :>• • ?.v*- 9 s- / i t',. ^ V ' '» ». ss r ' ^; AVE. . •••. • • • » t 'j .,»*• 5 A^h -• ,-f • ^ •• • ' { tAjA76,^ - t^BUy \N \v____------1--- “71-------------------------------1------------------------W---------------- /•I 1 . • ••*■ -• -• - — -• • - .-w - • . •. « »L• • / * ^ _./ 1 ... i '<'■f ■ i » • - m •• % 1 • • “ •■ • ... Mt »»* tr* •60 ........... ........................................................................................................................................... • •! • . V • I ilp^ ^ • ''S»V 5J " « 'i ‘gi>^ U98 L«50* 2*99 L«58* f. SIS ^iiVfim^yrTTfiX'-f'■■ H- • «, Wf 1* — •,;v.- • • \9 -- V. % '■ •• ■" t> — 1'. * ■ iij-ir TiVv^ ly*t* |J1' \-:::::.rzisiVe ^\'o . . *4. ^ J.«rI. ^ • ^4 -T -• • • « Hi - *. •^.•. “t “.i -r - •••“■ * ■• - • - V.**^ .1 . <* ^" • * • ♦ . . .J* 4»« ^ • • •? u if - \J ^ P*f r"'-Trv ■ - •_.............r- " 'I kf 'i'i •T‘[ ■•'i i‘v i'l’ V t: i 1‘> 11^ • I ?•. I ii t • t‘ !• i* u •■ i‘ • 1 1^1 ryi •» J, • r?;'! V» • i = 1!. [ ’• ?. I' I’ 1 { • I ^ * $ I \ G ! 1 ■" ' ■ ■' I---------------— i-Lr; • ..TI I ■ i.r" ■ i r ~ ~ ' . 'i' -iiiiiiiLi * .. MbtoCiJ . IL —( . ..li i'PT L-:-J III----------_ili------- iiHiil a .! t * .J < • .» ■;i 4.• ■; ji- iiV ii’’ ' -i 'I*fi-A \1> !:=i 1 •ti r _ i 1 !!s • i • i;'. K>H- 1 • i: r T) I ^i! ir- -h V, J-.___ . vT L . ■<^ a I« :j t Dl ii 'i >4 ! I* * V * * kli. ' *• ' ’• ■' iN'r'pg • < . I ■ *' ■ E f \ / E iM\ X-- E I Xi ___ ' r’-Ji'v fc ‘‘ 'l •i ^l‘i r :! .» I ^ • i'" 51 . i ;■ :';!i;ii‘:'!! □ 11% M I- -1^ 11 C'-s- 1 - JIXDQI] f i '■ # t-r .H -1 ' '• <-1 u ■1 ri­ ll I I ii ' •f \t| ■ «}t.. •» »( <p j!' V DM- o •>. I- . ■! \w\r -J- I.