Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-04-1987 Planning MinutesMiaoTBs OF tbm pumim amasstm mm HELD mr 4, i987 lAHCB 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows, Taylor, Johnson, and Brown. Cohen arrived at 7:46 P.M. Hanson was absent. The following represented the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. CounciImember Callahan was also present. *1112 SMITH BAY MARIHA & YACHT CLOB 1900 SBORBLIHB DRIVE COMDITIOHAL OSB PERMIT COHTIliaATIOH OP PUBLIC HBARIHG Present for this matter were Gerald Toberman and Woody I Love. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed that at the March 16, 1987 meeting. Planning Commision unanimously agreed that the proposed boat sales/service center use would be a less intense or less non-conforming use than the existing transmission shop. Planning Commission asked the applicant to submit a more detailed site plan of the operation. She reviewed the two site plans submitted: Exhibit E - Consists of 14 parking stalls and 4 boat parking stalls. This plan would only be possible if there were a through road from Spates Ave. to 1950 Shoreline Drive. Exhibit F - Consists of 8 parking stalls and / boat parking stalls with access from Spates Ave. only and a landscape buffer along the 1950 Shoreline Drive let line. At this time, the a • 'lication deals only with the transmission shop prv rty, not 1950 Shoreline Drive, therefore. Exhibit F is the plan to be considered. Chairman Kelley asked Zoning Administrator Mabusth to review the ownership history of the property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that currently R. W.Reutiman is the fee owner and Craig Olson of Tonka Transmission is the Contract for Deed owner and taxpayer. Mr. Toberman has purchased the outstanding contract for deed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Hennepin County Highway Dept, has asked that the surface runoff from the property be corrected to be retained on the property and allowed to enter the catch basin on west side of the County road right-of-way at a more controlled graduated rate. Applicant should provide a drainage plan to address the surface drainage for the site. i i i -,.»V3a;n. ♦SSK : 1:4;-TING HELD NAT 4, 1987NINUTBS OF THE PLANNING O #1112 SMITH BAT MARINA COHTIHUBD Chairman Kelley asked about the signage, lighting and the hours the center will be open. I Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the signage and lighting plan has been submitted. Applicant plans to utilize the present sign on the building and remove the road sign. Lighting will be shielded from residential lot lines as required by code. For more specific information regarding lighting, Mabusth referred to Mr. Love. Mr. Love stated that they plan minimal lighting to meeting the needs for safety and security. Hours of operation are 9 A.M. - 5 P.M. Monday through Saturday, with a possible decrease in hours during the winter. Dan i Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Ave., were present and stated they had no problem with the lighting as long as the 6' privacy fence is retained. Their main concern is the hope that the property would be routinely maintained. They are in favor of the proposal. Mr. Toberman stated that cleaning up the property was their priority intent. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Mr. Love stated they felt thv= proposed parking plan would be sufficient. Alan Nettles, 1940 Shoreline Drive, asked what was proposed to be planting within the curbing area along Shorelin-* Drive. He would like to see some landscaping to present a more rural residential look. Chairman Kelley stated that the type of landscaping is limited because of the sight distance for the Spates Ave. and Shoreline Drive intersection and also noted that certain types of landscaping could not tolerate the winter road salt. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the County will not allow any plantings within the right-of-way of County Rd. 15. The plan calls for a grass area with a nautical rope motif. Chairman Kelley asked about the height of the keel boats on trailers (excluding the mast) that will be stored for sale. Mr. Love stated that based on the parking plan for 7 boat stalls, stalls #1-4 maximum boat height would be 14', and stalls #5-7 maximum boat height would be 8'. Bocits will be on display uncovered year around. i \ !*o*Bs OP THE puumnK: coMussion hbbtiiig hbu > mi 4, ns? #1112 SHITB BAY MARIKA COKTIHUm> i Darklna *'® P'^opnsed locations for boat fhit not be a problem. Mary Crear requested that the fence along their lot line be extended to lot line“^V'ot^® along the 1950 Shoreline Drive alono tkieithe the fence . Itne extended any further towards Spates their vfew o7thfla^r it would obstruct pUbUc hearing '^'’® It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to sL7rre" ®PPtoval Of the conditional use%ermit per Staff recommendations and subject to: ^ a) Fence being repaired b) Allowing a maximum of 4 boats 20‘-25* to be ,^7nder2o‘7irffi: """ remaining 3 boats must Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0, Abstention 1. Cohen abstained his" ''°ti"9 in this application because of his past dealings with Mr. Toberman, which was mee"t?n7^"‘ “" = h 16, iH? Johnson questioned the issue of the County requesting an t^^7Vr°o7.Lr. •'OW i^ -Uld .fLtt Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City has =|r^^^fa7rth77it7rs%7n-rne7 j^r7 slihafufr- ®''ery time there is a 157t;7ru7t7S7t"m^o7e ^i^h^^^^^ay^\°o7 t^-f^tu^e possibility of expanding the road to which the City is opposed. ^ Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive, arrived after this public hearing was over. He wanted it noted that it a^corTing \o'’code*.” ® variance which is illegal kiaa .1- . imniTBS OF TBB FUttBUG >c»:77i ssim . I TIHG HELD MEY A, 1987 •1142 sun BET MEBIWI § TECHT dOB 1955 8BOBBI.TO MtIVB OOHDITIOni. OSB PBRNIT POBUC naUL'BG 7s54-8s29 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. t Present for this matter were Gerald Toberman and Woody Love. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the major upgrading plan of the entire B-2 property. The proposal includes a single 30'x40* principal structure (club house) surrounded by a 10* deck area on the northeast and southeast sides# with a 6* walkway extending to docks on the northeast end and a 4* walkway extending to the docks on the southeast. She reviewed the variances required of which all were either no change or less intense that the existing conditions. In response to Chairman Kelley's question regarding the status of the docks permit with the LMCD - Mr. Love stated the only outstanding issue is the removal of bouys and conversion of slips being discussed with the City and the location of slips being negotiated with the LMCD. Chairman Kelley reviewed the following variances for Planning Commission comments: Lakeshore Setback - Principal structure * SO' - variance of 25* Deck structure * 15' - variance of 60' Side Setback to Residential Used Property - Principal structure « 40' - variance of 10' Hardcover - 0-75' » 15,662 s.f. variance of 63.4% (10% improvement in hardcover) 75-250' ■ 5,100 s.f. (no change from existing) Lot Area = .71 Acre - variance of 1.3 acres Setback for Parking from Street Lot Line - Proposed =10' - variance of 20' Parking Requirements (6 stalls per 10 slips) - Based on 79 slips = 48 stalls required Proposed = 42 stalls - variance of 6 stalls ’^Note: The City always permitted this marina to use the municipal parking lot on weekends for overflow parking. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt comfortable with approving the variances. Taylor agreed with Chairman Kelley because in each instance they have either maintained the existing variance or improved the existing condition. *« ;! ; i \ tl ms OP THE PUynHEG COMUSSIOH MSBTIMG I I -.i ^»:iY 4, 1987 #1142 SHim B&T li kRI» COHTiaUBD . Bellows feels this is an appropriate use and finds no problems in terms of setback. She however, feels the parking is too tight for proper maneuverability. Additionally, she felt that the Planning Commission could not make a recommendation until a complete plan for the new club house is submitted. She suggested that the Planning Commission proceed with the other issues and conceptually approve the footprint. CounciImember Callahan stated that the Council will not review this application further until an entire connercial site plan has been sulwiitted. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Mr. Love stated the specific rip~rap plan to protect the shoreline is not available at this time. Chairman Kelley stated that plans pertaining to the shoreline should be submitted with the commercial site plan. Planning Commission discussed allowing a caretaker apartment above the club house. Planning Commission recommended that a caretaker be on site - possibly for the summer months only. Harriet Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave., asked about the status of an overflow parking lot on the 1950 Shoreline Drive residential property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the issue of permitting a parking lot on that property has been tabled by Council pending the commercial site plan. At this time, the overflow parking will be permitted in the municipal parking lot on weekends. Mr. Toberman stated that with the current proposal, an overflow parking area may never be needed. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Taylor, to recommend conceptual approval of the variances required with exception of the variance to the required 48 parking stalls. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Abstention 1. Cohen abstained. ( tf.B- MinjTBs or THE ruumiiG coiMissioa !TI«G HELD MM 4, 1987 #1122 BIG ISIABD VBTBRAH'S CMff - BQABD OF GOVBRBORS BIG ISIABD KBCX>RD LOT 7 COn>ITIOHBL 08B PBRNIT FBB8B III - COaCBPTlUa. KBVIBM Present for this matter were Alan Wisdorf, Larry Sharpe, and Joe Backes. t t t • ■ /mV . - t ■ |jp Mr. Wisdorf explained that the final development plan is a combination of three studies to determine what could be done with the camp. He believes that the plan is very grand in scope. The Board of Governors would like to work with staff on a realistic a..d acceptable plan. The majority of the Planning Commission, of which three are new members, would like to tour the island before further review and recommendation. Z o n1n g Administrator Mabusth noted that a Counci 1/Planning Coramlssion/staff tour is tentativelv scheduled for May 15th. ^ Bellws stated she was astounded with the proposed scope of the development plan, mainly because the Veteran's group has been struggling to accomplish the demolition and rehabilitation that currently exists. She is concerned about the economic viability of this economic information Should be submitted to support this plan. Mr. Wisdorf stated that he understands the concern of funding, however, he noted that the City has limited what they can do even if they have the means at this time to accomplish a particular goal (i.e. they currently have the funding and volunteers to paint but do not possess the necessary permit;. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that because all the buildings have been condemned, staff would like to convince them against this total development plan and work with them on a compromise of a summer camp and axactly what structures could remain. Mr. Wisdorf stated that they would like approval of some overnight camping for their work crews during the week in addition to weekends. Presently, they are restricted to only weekends. He stated they would like to start the permitting process for the work they intend to do next summer in order to avoid delays. Chairman Kelley suggested that they outline the steps they wish to take for next year's work. 6 A, -•it',' MIHUTBS OP THB PLIOnilHG COMMISSIOH rriHG HELD NAT 4, 1987 -r#1122 BIG ISLAND VBTBaCAH'S CAHP CONTIH1 It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to table this review pending the Big Island tour. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1128 BAINBT AHDBBSOH 780 OU> CBTSTAL BAT BOAD PBBLIMIHART SUBDIVISION - CLASS II CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HBARIN6 RBUONST TO BE TABLED Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that applicant has not submitted any additional information, therefore, staff and applicant request that this item be tabled. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to table this application. Motion, Ayes S, Nays 0. #1133 BNTTT MINER 3830/38(0 BATSIDB ROAD SUBDIVISION - CLASS I CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING Betty Miner and her agent, for this matter. Larry Langhahs, Were present Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that they received the additional survey information indicating no encroachments as previously thought. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the lot line rearrangement subdivision as proposed. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1138 RONALD B. DEMSHAR 2821 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:51-9:05 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Ronald Demshar was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to a) add second story to main body of house which currently has substandard setbacks on both sides, b) remodel the portion of the house away from the lake to create an attached garage requiring 12*x31' addition to house, and revise driveway; and c) construct a ground-level 12' x 24' deck on the lake side with a portion of sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalk ■ iAV r Aif'.iriki \ K.'TA. MiaUTBS OP THB PLMDilTC COMMISSIOH MBBTIHG WKTJl mT 4, 1987 #1118 DBMSHAR coariauBD along side of the house. He reviewed! the variances involved as follows: Side Setbacks - 2nd story - rignt side 5.6* (same as exists) 2nd story - left side 3.4' (same as exists) Addition - right side 9.2' (9.8' exists) Average lakeshore setback encroachment - 18' (same as exists) Hardcover - 0-75' - 3.4% (same as exists) 75-250' 61.7% (52.9% currently exists) Gaffron noted that no comments have been received from the neighbors and staff does not feel that the 2nd addition will hinder any of the neighbors view. Mr. Demshar noted that there are currently 50' pine trees on the neighbor's property which obstruct the view. Bellows asked applicant to explain his hardship for keeping the existing garage in addition to the new garage. Mr. Demshar stated that his basement is only 300 s.f., therefore the existing garage is neod for additional storage and boat storage. Cohen stated he was uncomfortable with the additional hardcover and setting a precedent. He would consider recommending approval if the existing garage were removed. Chairman Kelley agreed with Cohen noting more storage room would be accomodated with the new 2nd story addition. Mr. Demshar asked if the Planning Commission would be amenable to allowing the existing garage to remain until the new construction is completed. Chairman Kelley felt that retaining the garage until construction was completed would not be a problem. He asked what the actual hardcover calculation would be if garage were removed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that if garage were removed, the hardcover would increase by approximately 1.5% to total 54.4% 75-250* hardcover instead of the proposed 61.7%. 8 imniTBS OP THB puaniaG commissioh nbbtipg held nkt 4, 1987 #1138 DBHSHAR COBTI« Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the photos submitted by the applicant of the lakeshore which indicate an obvious need for some type of repair. He asked applicant what his intent was for lakeshore repair. Mr. Demshar stated he intends to eventually replace what exists. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted lakeshore repair work may or may not require a conditional use permit depending on exactly what changes applicant proposes. He noted that if a conditional use permit were requiredr it would involve a separate application. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval subject to: 1) 54.4% maximum approved hardcover in 75-250' 2) existing garage removed by May 1, 1988 3) no additional hardcover will be approved on this property Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1139 JIM « BOHMIB LEAR 2525 DmniOODY AVEMUE VARIAMCE PUBLIC HEARI1I6 9:07-9s21 The Affidr.vit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim Lear and his general contractor, Mike Schroeder, were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct an addition to an existing residence which would extend to within 4' of the existing garage. Because the code recuires a 10' separation between a principal building and accessory structure, applicants propose to attach the two structures by constructing a roof between them. He reviewed the following variances and facts: Hardcover - 0-75' 2.42% - no change proposed 75-250' - 28.7% existing - proposal is for equal tradeoff (no net increase) 250-500'- 13.17% existing - no change proposed i m:;i»ITBS OW ms PliMliaG COMHISSIOR NBBTIBG HBLD mat 4, 1987 #1139 I^IR CORT]• I'J Side Setback - The propos^al is to attach the existing garage to the house via a covered walkway. The existing garage is 6.7% from the side lot line. Technically, there is no change to existing structure or existing side setback, except that what was a detached garage will now be attached, still encroaching into the required 10* side setback. Average Lakeshore Setback - There is no additional distance encroachment over and above the existing 28' average setback line encroachment, but there is a 3 degree reduction in sideward views from the house to the south. Those views are already screened with existing vegetation so that the additional view encroachment is insignificant in staff's opinion. Bill Hultgren of 2545 Dunwoody, neighbor to the south, stated that he has reviewed the plans and has no objections. However, his only concern is any future use of the garage which is built too close to the property line. He would like some assurance that the garage and upper garage area will not be turned into living quarters. His reason is that it would be less than 20' from their main bedroom area. Mr. Lear stated that he does not intend on using this area as living quarters and understands Mr. Hultgren's position. He intends to sheetrock, insulate and provide a small space heater in the garage which will be use strictly as garage use in addition to keeping dogs inside during the day. Regarding the area above the garage, he plans to use it for a small train hobby room. Mike Schroeder reviewed the interior and exterior plans. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval subject to: 1. No additional hardcover will be allowed on the property. 2. The garage and upper garage area will not be plumbed nor be used as full time living space. li f mmOTES OF THE PLAmiHG COMNISSIOH HBBTIEG HELD WhY 4, 1987 #1139 WOL COETIB1 Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated he h«d concerns with controlling the future u*ie cf the garage once it is attached to the main residence. He suggested another alternative of granting a 4' variance between accessory structure and residence# therefore not connecting the two structures but providing firewall as needed# which would eliminate any future problems. Mr. Scbroeder seated that they would be xn favor of Gaffron's suggestion because that is what they originally intended. Mr. Lear concurred. ► Bellows questioned the viability and expense involved in firewalling the garage with a gambrel roof thus creating a fire hazard. She noted that in or.;er to avoid precedent setting# is should be stated in the resolution that this variance is being granted only because of an error in the original survey which resulted in the garage being placed too close to the lot line. Chairman Kelley withdrew his previous motion. It was moved by Bellows# seconded by Johnson# to recommv.i.<i approval of hardcover# side setback# and average setback variances as proposed# finding that side variance is being granted only because garage was constructed too close to the lot line in error# subject to the condition that the garage area may become heated space but may not be plumbed and may not be used as living quarters. Motion# Ayes 6# Nays 0. #1140 TOM BBRTHIAiniB 3035 CASCO POIBT ROAD VARIAECE PUBLIC HEARING 9:33>9:34 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Tom Berthiaume was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct a 2nd story bedroom and bathroom addition over the existing garage which is 7.1 feet from the side lot line and staff finds there will be no view encroachment from the addition. Staff recommends approval. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley# seconded by Cohen# to recommend approval as proposed. Motion, Ayes 6# Nays 0. ^ r; MIMmS OF THB PIAMHIHG CCMHISSIOH MBBTIHG HELD NET 4, 1987 #1141 SARLTON GBNPLBR/HiVRIA IVBS 1955 FE6KRNBSS POINT ROAD VARIANCBS PUBLIC HBARIB6 9s34-9;57 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for hardcover, lakeshore setback, and average lAJ^®shore setback variances to construct a tuckunder garage and ground level deck. He reviewed the following facts: Hardcover: 0-75' - 14,2% existing, 19.9% proposed "^5—250* — 37,7% existing, 32.5% proposed (net decrease overall of 121 s.f. on property) Structure: a) Proposed 350 s.f. deck, ground level, all within 0-75' setback zone. b) Proposed 1-story plus tuckunder garage on street side of house. Proposal is to removal existing garage/shed/driveway and replace with new driveway. Karlton Gempler and Maria Ives were present for this matter. Mr. Gempler showed the proposed plans noting that initially they proposed a 2nd story addition in the application which they have now eliminated. Taylor questioned the afforded lake view from the proposed ground level deck due to the trees and shrubs. Mr. Gempler stated that one tree has to be removed because it has dutch elm and he plans to cut back the existing shrubs. Applicant was advised that a conditional use permit is required for any grading within the 0-75' and that any trees in excess of 6" may not be removed without a permit issued by City staff and must be replaced with like replacements (with exception of dead trees). Planning Commission discussed any alternatives of 350 s.f. deck in the 0-75 zone. Mr. Gempler suggested the use of sand or wood chips used under deck with no plastic allowed. Assistant Zoning Administratrator Gaffron noted that there were two instances on Fagerness Point in which this was approved, however. Council has consistently rejected this alternative in the past two years. MINUTBS OP TBB PIAmiHG COMiasSlQB metim BKLD HAT 4, 1987 #1141 G1 LOt/IVBS COHTIHUBD Johnson felt applicant was entitled to have a deck to enjoy the lake and there is no other location for placement. Chairman Kelley felt the deck was excessive and suggested the alternative of allowing a widened stairway to be installed to alio use of the two proposed glass doors that exist from the lake side of the house a few feet above ground level. Bellows and Cohen concurred. Mr. Gempler stated that with no deck, entertaining would have to be provided on the grass area, and after a time, no grass area would be left. Taylor suggested and compromise between the stairs and a 350 s.f. deck. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron adjusted the 0-75' hardcover calculation if deck were only 230 s.f.as follows* final 17.3% hardcover as opposed to the proposed 19.9%, based on the 23' distance between outside of proposed doors and a 10' width. John Waldron, 1951 Concordia St, adjacent property owner was present for this review, but made no comments. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval subject to reducing the size of the ground level deck to 230 s.f. to be constructed with a sand base with no plastic liner in order to maintain absorbtion capacity of ground below deck. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 3. Kelley, Bellows, and Cohen voted nay because no hardship was proven to justify the size of deck proposed, but they would be willing to allow the widened stairway as suggested. Motion resulted in a split vote. #1109 CURTIS JOHHSOH 2024 SHADTNOOD ROAD VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW Curtis Johnson and Pam Willette were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Mr. Johnson requests Planning Commission give additional consideration to his proposed placement of a second story deck past the average house setback line because he feels there is a distinct hardship placed on his 1 linniTBS OF THB PLMnilBG COHNISSIOH :\a:mm HffiLD HKI 4, 1987 fii09 JOBBSoa corn II -I property due to the 6' high solid fence extending along the deck of his neighbor to the south. Mr. Johnson submitted photos of the adjacent homes which indicate the house to the south has a second story deck extending 6' and has a 6' wall/fence excending out approximately 15-17' along the side which drastically reduces applicant's view. In response to Chairman Kelley's question. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the 6' fence was never permitted as such technically they cannot have the 6' fence there. Regarding requiring removal of th^* fence, because staff cannot verify when the fence was place, Gaffron is unsure that the City can legally require its removal. Chairman Kelley felt a decision could not be made until it was known whether the fence could or could not be required to be removed. Taylor questioned whether the Planning Commission had an accurate depiction to make their recommendation relative to the physical location of the 6' long fence, and if not, the average house setback may in fact be closer to the lake giving the applicant more room to work with. Bellows noted her concerns with leap frog encroachment into the average lakeshore setback area. Planning Commission member Johnson recommended using the 1st story deck at 2016 Shadywood and the 2nd story deck at 2032 Shadywood to determine the average deck setback for applicants deck at 2024 Shadywood. Staff recommended allowing applicants house to be placed up to the average setback line and allowing a 6' maximum second story deck past the average setback line. After discussion, it was moved by Taylor, seconded by Johnson, to revise their recommendation from the April 20th meeting as follows: House must be behind average house setback line. Second story deck may extend 6' further lakeward or up to the "average second story deck setback line", whichever is more restrictive. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1, Abstention 1. Cohen voted nay. Bellows abstained. CounciImember Callahan stated that he did not agree with the method determining the average setback. ^ 1 ■’'Ik IS OP TEB pumim COlWISSIOa MBBTIHG held net 4, 1987 EPPBOPM. OP mmiTBS Taylor requested to amend the minutes regarding his comment during Application #1119 Duncan MacMillan to read: "However, he felt the nature of the hardship, protecting the safety and well being of the applicants, was not an acceptable legitimate hardship • • • It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to approve the Minutes of the April 20, 1987 Planning Commission meeting as amended. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. PLMnmiG COHNISSION RBPRBSBHTATIVE Planning Commission member Brown was appointed to attend the May 26, 1987 Council meeting. ADJOUR]I I --4 IT 10s33 P.N. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:33 P.M. ! 1 1 ■1 i 4