Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-18-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, September 18, 2023, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the Agenda items is available on the City website (www.oronomn.gov) under Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet — located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Maria Veach Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: August 21, 2023 Public Hearings: 1. LA23-000046 Rebecca Holzem, 3407 Eastlake Street, requests variances for average lakeshore setback, 75 -foot lake setback, hardcover, and hardcover within the 75 -foot lake setback for the construction of a deck. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 2. LA23-000047 Erica Hway — Landschute, 2245 French Lake Road, requests variances from the 150 -foot lake setback and hardcover within the 150 -foot lake setback for the construction of a new house. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 3. LA23-000048 Sharratt Design & Company, 3548 Ivy Place, requests variances for lot area, lot width, and hardcover in conjunction with construction of a new home. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 4. LA23-000049 Stonewood, 3001 Casco Point Road, requests an after -the -fact average lakeshore setback variance for a roofed porch. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA23-000052 Revis Stephenson, 3760 Watertown Road, requests a variance for the placement of a new oversized accessory building streetward of the principal building. (Staff: Natalie Nye) Other Items: Update on September 11, 2023 City Council meeting. Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to October 9, 2023 City Council meeting: Jon Ressler Sign up for email notifications at www.oronomn.gov — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Mark McCutcheon, Jon Ressler, Bob Erickson, Gary Kraemer and Dennis Libby (arrived at about 7 p.m.). Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Natalie Nye. Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Kraemer moved, McCutcheon seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 17, 2023 Ressler moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of July 17, 2023. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA23-000026 ESKUCHE DESIGN O/B/O DAN & HEIDI MARTINSON, 2605 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL VARIANCES WITHIN THE 75 -FOOT LAKE SETBACK, HARDCOVER AND WETLAND SETBACKS IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A HOME ADDITION, AN IN -GROUND POOL, AND OTHER HARDCOVER AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS. City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the property has lakeshore on the south and an inlet creek connecting to French Lake which establishes a 75 -foot setback along both the south and west sides of the property resulting an approximate 5,000 square foot buildable area. The inlet is also classified as a protected wetland. The existing home on the property is located almost entirely within the 75 -foot lake setback, she said. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the home within the 75 -foot lake setback, new exterior walls under the lakeside deck, a new in -ground swimming pool, and new retaining walls, stairs, walkways, as well as other hardcover changes to the site within the 75 -foot setback. They are proposing to remove about 4,000 square feet of driveway, some of which would be converted to pool and pool patio areas and a portion would be covered by a new detached garage. They would add a six-foot high stone wall to surround the pool area on the inlet and street sides of the patio area within the setback. Overall hardcover would remain conforming but much is in the 75 -foot setback. The applicant has identified the unique configuration with lakeshore on two sides as a practical difficulty supporting the requested variances. Staff finds that the additional setback burden on the property resulting from the inlet does create practical difficulty, but the owners have reasonable use of the property within the existing principal building and have better alternatives for expansion or improvements. The proposed addition could be constructed in a more conforming location, she said. Staff recommends denial as submitted. The applicant is present, she said. Bollis asked if the inlet was public water and is that why there is a 75foot setback there because that seems restrictive, he said. Page 1 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Curtis said the inlet is public water. While the hardcover is being reduced staff would like to see a breakdown of how much of the reduction is in the setback, she said. Peter Eskuche of Eskuche Design, Deephaven, pointed out the small buildable triangle created by the two 75 -foot setbacks and said they are basically proposing to replace part of the driveway with the pool. The new garage would be conforming. The reduction would be a reduction of 212 square feet of hardcover in the 75 -foot setback, he said, with a total reduction in hardcover of nearly 2,000 square feet. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. There were no public comments Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. Bollis said he thought the applicant had done a good job of keeping the changes in the existing hard cover given the limitations of the site. He noted that the pool is not just a trade-off of hardcovers since it is considered a structure. McCuthen said it is definitely a unique lot. He lives near there and is concerned that in a wet year part of this property could be underwater. He said is not in support of adding a pool and without a pool there would be no need for some of the additional walls but he saw some wiggle room on the home addition considering the whole home is non -conforming. He appreciates the reduction of hardover in the 75 -foot setback. Erickson said he had concerns regarding the practical difficulties. He cited Minnesota Statute 462537 Sub. 62 saying variances should only be permitted when they are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the ordinance. He did not feel that was applicable here when the applicants were not choosing other locations that would be more conforming. There is another side to the property that is farther away from the lakeshore. Ressler clarified the pool is considered an accessory structure with a 15 -foot setback if it was a side -yard. He said he was not in favor of putting a pool in the 75 -foot setback and would support positioning that pool outside of the 75 -foot lakeshore setback he would be more comfortable with that. Staff has said it wants a more specific survey of the difference between existing and proposed hardcover before it goes to Council. The inlet needs to be noted but even more noted should be the lakeshore setback. If the structure of the pool moves outside of the 75 -foot setback he sees the pool patio and driveway as a one-for-one tradeoff. He is also concerned about the six-foot walls because fencing is not allowed in the setback. Commissioners were in agreement that they would support the application with relocation of the pool away from lakeshore setback, reconsideration of the six-foot walls and a better survey of the difference between existing and proposed hardcover. Commissioners explained they could vote on the application or table. If there was a vote to deny the applicant still could go directly to the City Council and choose whether or not to make the recommended changes before it was presented to Council. If the application was tabled it would have to come back to Planning Commission before going to Council Ressler moved, McCutcheon seconded, to deny LA23-000026, 2605 North Shore Dr. Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. Page 2 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. 2. LA23-000030 RYAN ORTLIP, 4685 WEST BRANCH ROAD (PID 0711723220011), REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A REZONING IN ORDER TO ALTER AND REMOVE A WETLAND FROM THE OFFICIAL WETLAND OVERLAY DISTRICT MAP TO SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DRIVEWAY. City Planner Nye explained the City has a wetland map and in order to complete this project the City would have to approve a rezoning (removing the wetland from the City's wetland Map) and issue a wetland alteration permit. The applicant has purchased the vacant property located at 4685 West Branch Road to build a single-family home. The lot is 5.8 acres and includes a 25 -foot -wide parcel that connects to West Branch Road and provides access to the main, buildable area of the property. The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on this piece of the property which includes a wetland. The wetland will need to be altered and filled in order to construct a driveway. The wetland is defined as a wet meadow or shallow marsh wetland. The total area proposed to be altered for the new driveway is approximately 2,760 square feet, she said. The applicant is proposing to mitigate the wetland impacts with wetland bank credits as recommended by Minnehaha Creek Watershed (MCWD). The proposed project will require Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits for erosion control, waterbody crossing, wetland protection, floodplain alteration, and wetland conservation act. Staff has been in contact with the MCWD and all permits are expected to be approved in September. Nye said the proposed wetland alteration is minimal to support the construction of the driveway, which is the only access way to the property. Staff finds that the alteration of the wetland will not negatively impact adjacent properties or the floodplain. Staff would require all MCWD approvals to be in place before bringing the application to the City Council. The applicant was present, she said. Bollis clarified that the applicant owns the 25 -foot strip that will be used for the driveway. Ryan Ortlip currently living in Eden Prairie, explained the strip is part of the property but has an easement. The whole goal of the application is to gain access to the lot. The plan would include a culvert that would help with drainage. There would be no change in high water level for the fill. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. Eric Truskoski, 4665 West Branch Road, spoke in support of the application. He said the applicant has been very good about staying in touch and making plans to make sure their front yard is drained. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. Bollis said this one looks pretty straightforward and it sounded like the MCWD would be doing most of the heavy lifting. Ressler moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000030 4685 West Branch Road Rezoning as applied contingent upon MCWD approval and continued support of the affected neighbor. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000037 GAVIN TEMPERO, 3260 BOHNS POINT LANE, REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOME ADDITION. Page 3 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to construct a new screened in porch addition on top of an existing deck. The existing deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback by approximately 5 feet. The existing deck meets all other setback requirements including the 75 -foot lake setback. The proposed screened -in porch addition will maintain the 75 -foot lake setback and will not impact hardcover but would create a vertical encroachment so requires a variance. The property currently meets the hardcover requirements with the hardcover at approximately 21 percent of the lot and that would not change. The applicant has identified the existing conditions of the property as a practical difficulty adding the home is situated on the property in such a way that the screened -in porch expansion would not impact the lake views of the neighboring property. Staff agrees that the expansion of the screened- in porch on top of the existing deck will not negatively impact lake views for the neighboring property and recommends approval. The applicant is available, she said. The applicant was present but staff had no additional questions. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:41 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:41 p.m. Kraemer said he would be in favor of the application. Ressler said staff had done a nice job on the information and it is not an egregious change. Ken Tempero, 3265 Bohns Point Lane and the nearest neighbor, said his house is oriented differently and the way the lakeshore runs it will not impact their view of the lake and in fact may cut down on the noise from Highway 51. Kraemer moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000037 3260 Bohns Point Lane Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 4. LA23-000038 JOAT LLC — JACK EVANS, 1920 CONCORDIA STREET, REQUESTS A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A NEW FRONT STOOP. City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the property owner constructed the home at 1920 Concordia Street in approximately 1972. The home was built at the 30 -foot front yard setback leaving little room for more than a minimal stoop. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing small concrete stoop and replace it with an 8 foot by 8 -foot deck. The existing stoop is about 27 feet from front property line. The new proposed deck would be 22 -feet from the line. The intent is to create a small outdoor space and to provide a larger landing to support an accessible ramp. The applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties. Staff finds the location of the existing home at the building setback line creates difficulties for supporting anything larger than the building -code required minimum 4 foot by 3 -foot entry stoop. Letters and calls of support from neighbors have been received. Staff recommends approval as applied. Kathy Weist, 1920 Concordia Street, said her father lives at the address. He is 85 years old and although he can still walk, has a hard time getting up the step. All the neighbors are in support. Page 4 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. McCutcheon said this application is pretty conservative and Minnesota winters get tough as people get older. Ressler said he had nothing else to add. Erickson said he is in favor. Erickson moved, McCutcheon seconded, to approve LA23-000038, 1920 Concordia St. Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 5. LA23-000039 EUGENE DOBKIN, 1380 REST POINT ROAD, REQUESTS VARIANCES FROM LOT SIZE, LOT WIDTH, HARDCOVER, AND REAR YARD SETBACK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOME. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating that the lot size is substandard for the zoning district and the existing home is nonconforming and protrudes into the average lakeshore setback, rear yard setback, and has improvements within the 75 -foot lake setback. The property is also beyond the allowable hardcover. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing one and a half story home and build a new two-story home on the property. The proposed home will be constructed further from the lake and will meet the required 75 -foot lake setback and comply with the average lakeshore setback as well. The proposed home will still have a rear yard setback of 28.1 feet where a 30 -foot setback is required. The project will reduce hardcover from 28.5 percent to 27.2 percent which will still require a variance. The applicant is proposing to keep the existing non -conforming shed/boathouse on the property. The existing driveway is also non -conforming but would stay and that is allowed. The overall project will require variances from lot area, lot width, hardcover, and rear -yard setback. The applicant has identified the property's substandard size, width and location of existing improvements as practical difficulties: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The property is substandard in size and width. The proposal to demolish the existing home and build a new home that is setback further from the lake which meets the required 75 -foot setback and average lakeshore setback and reduces the hardcover has the support of staff. Eugene Dobkin, 1380 Rest Point Rd., said they have been working hard on the plan and that the house would not look noticeably different from the existing house from the outside and would have a similar footprint. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:53 p.m. David Wiemer, 1405 Rest Point Rd. said he has looked at the plans and they are in keeping with the neighborhood. His only concern was the ability of construction equipment to get in and out of the neighborhood since Rest Point Road is a very narrow road. He would ask the applicant, who is a neighbor, to work with the contractor on minimizing the impact of construction traffic. Otherwise, he said, it looks good. Page 5 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. The builder was present and said on days when there would cement trucks or big deliveries, they would inform the neighbors of what is happening. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Bollis said it is nice to see applications where what is proposed is better than existing. He is in favor in view of positive comments from the neighbors and a contractor who agrees to communicate with neighbors. Ressler said he was happy to see an improvement that includes addressing hardcover and lakeshore setback. Kraemer also said he supports it because of the reduction of hardcover and added distance from the lakeshore. McCutcheon moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000039 1380 Rest Point Road Variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. Commissioner Libby arrived at about 7 p.m. 6. LA23-000042 ALLISON HOUSTON, 4731 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS A SETBACK VARIANCE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW DECK AND PATIO WITHIN A BLUFF SETBACK. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is proposing to enlarge a deck and patio on the west side of their home within a bluff setback. The City prohibits any buildings or structures within 30 feet of a top of a bluff and there is also a most sensitive bluff impact zone of 20 feet. The existing deck and at -grade patio underneath are entirely within the bluff setback and were originally approved with variances when the house was constructed in 2013. The applicant is proposing to expand both. There is some unimproved right of way next to the property where the City has done some stabilization in a sensitive area. The applicant is also proposing to remove an existing patio and a lakeside deck that were constructed by a previous owner without permits, which would bring the property into compliance with hardcover. The applicant has identified the substandard lot size and width as practical difficulties as well as the existing improvements and the natural landscape of the lot. Staff finds that there are a practical difficulties in the size and width of the lot, however the property currently has a deck and patio that allow for full use and enjoyment of the lot and the City is committed to protecting sensitive bluffs. The proposed project would decrease the setback from 10 to 8 feet at the bluff. While staff is supportive of the removal of nonconforming improvements and reduction in hardcover, staff cannot support the proposal as applied, Nye said. The applicant is present. McCutcheon asked if removing the existing non -conforming used would destabilize he bluff. Nye said it would have to be done carefully since previous owners had already disturbed that sensitive area. Allison Houston, 4731 North Shore Drive, said when they purchased the home they were naive about building regulations. The lot is narrow and steep. They would like to expand the deck to make it more Page 6 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. usable. Because of the topography of the lot there is no other location. The bluff would fall off about six to 8 feet into the yard from the lake. The designer was also present and answered specific questions regarding footings. Erickson asked how much a two -foot difference would really make to their use of the patio. Houston said it is an oddly -shaped deck and once a table and grill is there it gets difficult to use. They were hoping to even the shape of the deck. She noted this was about the third version of the plan because they kept trying to minimize the encroachment on the bluff. Erickson noted a neighbor had sent an email supporting the project. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Bollis said he thought the applicant has made a good effort to propose a project that is limited in encroachment on the bluff. Removal of the lakeside pieces makes the situation better and would probably work if done in wintertime, he said, adding it is rare he disagrees with staff but supports this application. Mark McCutcheon said he could see the back and forth and based on where it is, the proposal is not egregious. He would agree to wiggle on this one, he said. The City has seen some of these bluff projects go bad so don't try to limit the footings, he added. Kraemer said he agreed with the other commissioners and the proposed plan for the footings. Ressler said it was worth noting that neighbors were in support. Kraemer moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000042 4731 NORTH SHORE DRIVE Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 7. LA23-000043 JALIN DESIGN, LLC - JEFF LINDGREN, 2726 CAROLINE AVENUE, REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A ROOF EXPANSION. City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item explaining that in 2022 an average lakeshore setback variance was granted for additions and modifications to the existing home within the setback. After the approval, the owners decided on a new build instead. The variances granted remain in effect and overall the new home will comply with the zoning setbacks as well as the variance approvals. However, the new plans reflects a change in the roof shape, height, and mass within the average lakeshore setback which will require a new average lakeshore setback variance, according to Curtis, although there are no new footprint encroachments. The applicant has identified the shoreline, the adjacent homes, and the shape and orientation of the property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Staff agrees that the location of the existing home with respect to the shoreline and the home to the north contribute to the practical difficulty on this property and the curve of the shoreline also creates a challenge. Supportive Page 7 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION August 21, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. comments were received from neighbors. The proposed changes to the roofline cannot be made without a variance. Staff recommends approval. The applicant is present, she said. Jeff Lindgren, Jalin Design, Brooklyn Park, said they were approved for average lakeshore variances last year but decided it would better the site, neighborhood and home by replacing the existing house. He said the design for the new home met the approved footprint but it was decided the architecture needed to be upgraded to today's fashion. In the process modifications were made to remove protrusions at the sides but raise the roof. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Libby said there were so many agreeable aspects to the application and he couldn't find any disagreeable aspects. Bollis said it was already approved at that location and was just a roof change. Ressler moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000043, 276 Caroline Ave. Variance. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS — Update on August 14, 2023 City Council Meeting Community Development Director Oakden updated the Commission on the August 14 City Council meeting. The Council's approvals were consistent with the Planning Commission. There was some back and forth on a retaining wall that the Planning Commission and City Council had seen several times, but they were able to mitigate with fixes that were observed by the City's inspectors, she said. A preliminary plat for a 10 -acre two -lot subdivision on Whildhurst was approved. ADJOURNMENT Kramer moved, Ressler seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. ATTEST: Christopher Bollis, Chair Page 8 of 8 Date Application Received: 08/15/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/05/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 11/04/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: September 18, 2023 Subject: LA23-000046, Rebecca Holzem, 3407 Eastlake Street, Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for average lakeshore setback, 75 - foot lake setback, overall hardcover and hardcover within the 75 -foot lake setback to construct a new deck. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial of the variance as applied. Background The subject property is substandard in size and width for the LR -1A zoning district. While the property does not directly front on Stubbs Bay, the OHWL extends onto the subject property and a creek runs along the southern edge of the property. The property is therefore subject to the 75 -foot lake setback and average lakeshore setback. The home is almost entirely within the 75 -foot setback as shown in Exhibit C. The applicant does not currently have a deck or patio and is proposing to construct a new 14 -foot by 20 -foot, 280 square foot, deck on the south side of the home. The proposed deck would encroach into the average lakeshore setback and entirely be within the 75 -foot setback. The proposed deck is approximately 31 feet from the OHWL and creek. The proposed deck addition would increase hardcover on the property from 27.63% to 35.07% when 25% is permitted. The existing home on the property received variances in 2005 in order to be constructed within the 75 -foot lake setback. As part of that approval, from 2005, the Resolution 5222 identifies a condition that any future request to increase hardcover will not likely be approved without a current reduction in hardcover. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the extremely substandard lot size and width as practical difficulties. The property also must adhere to lake setbacks due to the proximity of the OHWL and creek tributary. The subject property has no exterior living space and currently does not have a patio or deck to enjoy the yard. The applicant states they have proposed a deck that is comparable in size to neighboring properties' outdoor living spaces. The commission should ask the applicant for additional testimony identifying additional practical difficulties supporting the deck request. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds that there are practical difficulties in the size and width of the lot. The subject property is substandard in size and width. The LR -1A LA23-000046 September 18, 2023 Page 2 of 5 Zoning District requires a 2 -acre minimum and a minimum width of 200 feet. The subject property is 4,488 square feet (0.1 acres) in size and 44 feet wide. The small lot size coupled with the required setbacks eliminates any compliant buildable area. The subject property does not have any outdoor living space and therefore it is a reasonable request to have a small outdoor deck. However, the deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback and a redesign could eliminate this variance request. Additionally, the property received variances in 2005 for the construction of the home and the resolution approving those variances (Exhibit H) explicitly state that the homeowner chose to forego a deck in order to minimize hardcover. The resolution goes on to state that any future requests to increase hardcover would likely not be approved without some reduction in hardcover. The applicant has not proposed to eliminate any hardcover on the site, only add to the overall hardcover bringing to total hardcover on the site to 35%. Staff is not supportive of the proposal as applied, however would be amendable to a redesign outside of the average lakeshore setback line and with some reduction of hardcover. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350— Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1A Required Existing Proposed Rear (Street) 50' 15' 15' Side (East) 10' 10' 10' Side (West) 10' 10' 10' Lakeshore* 75' 41' (house) 31' (deck) Average Lakeshore The proposed deck encroaches by approximately 8' *The home must adhere to the lake setback due to the creek and OHWL of Lake Minnetonka that is present on the property. Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 4,488 (0.1 acre) 44'@75'/ 44' @ OHWL Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Allowed Existing Overlay District Total Area Hardcover Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1,122 s.f. 1,240 s.f. 1,574 s.f. Tier 1 4,488 s.f. (25 %) (27.63%) (35.07%) Applicable Regulations: Averaee Lakeshore & 75 -foot Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279 Most of the existing home is within the 75 -foot lake setback. The current home was approved by variances in 2005 due to its extremely small lot size and not having a compliant buildable area. The proposed deck is situated on the south side of the home and will create a new encroachment into the 75 -foot lake setback and will also extend into the average lakeshore setback. The home currently complies with the average lakeshore setback, but the new deck would extend approximately 8 feet past the average lakeshore setback line. LA23-000046 September 18, 2023 Page 3 of 5 Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700 and 78-1680) The property is approximately 0.1 acres in a 2.0 -acre zoning district. The maximum allowable hardcover is 1,122 square feet. The property received a hardcover variance in 2005 in order to construct the home, driveway and walkway. The current property is at approximately 27.63% hardcover when 25% is the maximum. The resolution approving the 2005 variance explicitly stated that the homeowner was foregoing a deck in order to minimize the hardcover request and that further hardcover expansion would not be supported. The proposed deck expansion increases hardcover by approximate 334 square feet (deck, stairs, and landing) brining the percentage of hardcover up to 35% for the lot. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variance is not in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed deck is within the 75 -foot lake setback and creates a new encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The increase in hardcover is also not supported by the Ordinance. This criterion is not met. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan emphasizes the protection of natural resources including our natural waterways. The proposal creates new encroachments in the 75 -foot lake setback and increases hardcover. This criterion is not met. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new deck is not supported by practical difficulties and therefore is not a reasonable use of the property. This criterion is not met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lot size and width have not been created by the current homeowner. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance in order to construct a new deck would not likely impact the character of the area. LA23-000046 September 18, 2023 Page 4 of 5 The proposed deck is minimal and not intrusive and would have little impact on neighboring properties. This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The special conditions of the property include the substandard lot size and width. The subject properties size is unique to the zoning district and larger area. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The subject property is unique in its small size, width and proximity to the OHWL and creek which prevent the property from having a compliant building envelope. This criterion is not met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home does not have any outdoor living space. The construction of the deck would allow the homeowner to fully enjoy the property. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances would be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter due to the increase in hardcover and further encroachment into the 75 -foot setback and average lakeshore setback. This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The property does not have any outdoor living space and therefore the request is not simply to serve as a convenience to the applicant. However, minor modifications could lessen the hardcover impact and remove the encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Engineer Comments The City Engineer has not reviewed the proposed plan. A thorough review will be conducted at the time of building permit. LA23-000046 September 18, 2023 Page 5 of 5 Public Comments The applicant has provided neighbor acknowledgment forms from the abutting neighbors. No other public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Commission find the increase in hardcover necessary? 3. The Commission should discuss if the property owner has reasonable use of the property. 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends denial of application as applied due to the increase in hardcover and further encroachment into the 75 -foot setback and new encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The previously approved variances for the house explicitly state that further hardcover expansion would not be supported and that a deck was contemplated and not included as part of the original proposal in order to minimize the hardcover request. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Plans Exhibit E. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Site Photos & Aerial Exhibit G. Neighbor Acknowledgment Forms Exhibit H. Resolution 5222 (original approval of house) Exhibit 1. Property Owners List and Map 9/13/23, 2:08 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 08/15/2023 Address: 3407 Eastlake Street Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723130035 Land Use Number: LA23-000046 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: REBECCA LYNN HOLZEM Address: 3407 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Name: Rebecca Holzem Applicant: Company: Address: 3407 East Lake Street Orono, MN 55356 rlholzem@yahoo.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Add Elevated Deck to back of House off of 2nd Floor Kitchen Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12203161 &WorkOrder_ID=876... 1 /1 9/13/23, 2:11 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000046 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The applicant/homeowner proposes to use the property in a very reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. The applicant viewed and measured all other patios and or decks on neighboring properties and created a simple deck plan that is approximately the same size if not smaller in size to her neighbors living in the adjacent properties, and is cognizant that the proposed deck and descending staircase into the back yard will not in any way negatively affect the site lines of the neighbor(s) living in either and or both 3405 and 3403 East Lake Street. The neighbors living at 3409 East Lake Street do not have views into the applicant's back yard as their large garage and a large maple tree located on the applicant's property obstruct said views. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The lot size of the property is 44' W x 102' D and there is a creek that runs through the back of the property where a 75' lake setback is normally required and a 30' side setback is normally required. The size of this property is the smallest of all the lots located in the East Lake Street/Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka neighborhood. The unique circumstances of this property were not created by the landowner as the lot size was formed decades prior to the applicant's purchase of the property in 1996. This is a unique property whereas 79% is located within 75' of the creek and the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: If the variance is granted, the raised deck will not alter the character of the property, neighborhood and/or adjacent properties. All existing landscaping on the East, West and North facing areas of the property will not be affected or altered in any manner. There are two hydrangea bushes that will need to be removed from the South -facing planting bed against the house as the proposed deck will not allow for sufficient sunlight for proper growth. The two hydrangea bushes will be transplanted to other areas of the property accordingly. (Attached photos demonstrate how the property has been improved by the planting and maintaining of perennials/planting beds on all sides of the property following the 2005 home build. NOTE: No landscape fabric has ever been used on this property by current homeowner therefore eliminating chemicals from the plastics/landscape fabric leaching into the ground and subsequently leaching in to the well water and the creak.) 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: At the time that the current home was built, the applicant was not financially able to build a deck onto the back side of the house and at the time that the original variances/setbacks were requested, she chose to forgo the building of a deck at that time but always planned on pursuing the addition of a raised deck off the 2nd floor kitchen at a time in the future when she was more financially stable and able to do so along with upgrading the siding from vinyl siding to a more quality siding product to enhance the look, the usability, the enjoyment and also the value of the property. The addition of a deck will add to the quality of life and overall enjoyment of the property throughout the year - placing a barbequing unit on the deck for grilling throughout the year and hosting family and friends out of doors throughout the Spring, Summer and Fall. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12203161 &WorkOrder_ID=876... 1/3 9/13/23, 2:11 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The creek flowing into Stubb's Bay curves and meanders along thru the applicant's back yard and the back yards of 3403 and 3405 East Lake Street but then curves and flows in a manner that is does not directly flow through the back yards thus not affecting several of the other properties on the South side of East Lake Street. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Other land / properties within the district are larger in size than the applicant's property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The applicant has owned the property for 27 years - living off-site for 1 year during the construction of the current home between November 2004 thru November 2005. Throughout the 26 years the applicant has resided on this property she has not had any outdoor living space for seating and/or dining and has only spent time in the yard when either mowing the lawn or maintaining the planting beds. By granting the requested variances, the applicant/homeowner will be able to enjoy the entire property - especially during the extremely short Minnesota Summer months. The applicant works two jobs - her full-time position is working in an office setting with little to no access to the outdoors throughout the day/ workweek. The applicant's second job is working evenings and weekends out of the home at a desk, in front of a computer. Outdoor living space will allow for connecting to the computer while sitting on/working from the deck and enjoying the back yard and weather, not being stuck inside the home. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: By granting the requested/proposed variances and allowing the applicant to construct an https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12203161 &WorkOrder_ID=876... 2/3 9/13/23, 2:11 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve elevated deck off of the kitchen at the rear of the house on the 2nd level, it will not in any way impair the health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: By granting the variance(s) and allowing the applicant to build a deck/outdoor living space off of the 2nd Level Kitchen at the back of the property is not merely a convenience but also a safety measure. The home has a unique interior staircase between the levels. The homeowner had hip replacement surgery in October 2022 and has not fully regained mobility. She also has both cervical and lumbar spine issues that cause instability in maneuvering stairs and must use the stairway's handrails for maximum stability when ascending and descending. Therefore, carrying prepared food and beverage items down stairs and through the lower level of the home and then lugging items back up to the 2nd floor kitchen is not possible/suitable for safety reasons. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12203161 &WorkOrder_I D=876... 3/3 1—\/IY�TIA 1/'1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR REBECCA HOLZEM IN LOT 1, BLOCK $ BAN SIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 0 I �.4 CONTOUR LINE CREEK i EASTLAKE STREET -933.1 N 90000'00" E 44.00 (933.4) J i / DRIVEWAY (B) (934.1) 93 (933.4) 50 44 tC) _ . ----------------• ---- .......... .......-...-•••••.............. L� ......... 10.1 (934.2); 0.25 �:-• (D) p I I 7-22-0 75' SETBACK _,{............." scn�E 1 =1 O aoeN0. 3-066 LINE J I 1 { °SHE ET' { O --....... -• --- �? 10.0 o T I i )33.5) I o �E) I I o HOUSE o 0 co #3407 z I �.4 CONTOUR LINE CREEK i EASTLAKE STREET -933.1 N 90000'00" E 44.00 (933.4) J i / DRIVEWAY (B) (934.1) 93 (933.4) 50 44 tC) _ . ----------------• ---- .......... .......-...-•••••.............. L� ......... 10.1 (934.2); LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East 44.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 8, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA : Denotes found iron marker - -933-- : Denotes existing countour (933.6) ` Denotes existing spot elevation This survey intends to show the boundary of the above described property, and existing house, drive, and visible hardcover. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachements. (932.6) ,50� ' ' (932.6) / • • EDGE OF CREEK .:- CREEK N 90000'00" W 44.00 N 10 20 PC Exhibit C E, SCALE IN FEET GARAGE FLOOR (D) p 7-22-0 RC`NBERG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW 'DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952-473-4141 fAX: 952-473-4435 scn�E 1 =1 O aoeN0. 3-066 8-11-04 REVISED DRAWN 8-13-04 REVISED 10-28-o REVISES HEct<E I Dare ?-/-Z3 MINN.LICENSE NUMBER�� ��� °SHE ET' 933.9 MAIN 6.0 --....... -• --- �? 10.0 FLOOR =934.7 P. )33.5) EXISTING �E) I o HOUSE co #3407 EAST LAKE STREET o UJ M O I (A) (n -- / / o / 24.0 F-------- .-- T W /�•1.0 0 (9 1) STOOP (0) (93�f0) 10.0 O PROP. LAN DIN 0 PR OPOSED _ -- I (H) o --"--T ADDiTIQN u) { (,G)—� I ---20.00_ :E4- PROP. STAIRS (933.63 I` � {I) AVERAGE LAKESHORE \ SETBACK LINE A� + LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East 44.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 8, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA : Denotes found iron marker - -933-- : Denotes existing countour (933.6) ` Denotes existing spot elevation This survey intends to show the boundary of the above described property, and existing house, drive, and visible hardcover. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachements. (932.6) ,50� ' ' (932.6) / • • EDGE OF CREEK .:- CREEK N 90000'00" W 44.00 N 10 20 PC Exhibit C E, SCALE IN FEET 'REVISIONSI DATE REMARKS hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7-22-0 RC`NBERG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW 'DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952-473-4141 fAX: 952-473-4435 scn�E 1 =1 O aoeN0. 3-066 8-11-04 REVISED DRAWN 8-13-04 REVISED 10-28-o REVISES HEct<E Dare ?-/-Z3 MINN.LICENSE NUMBER�� ��� °SHE ET' 6-9-23 AS -BUILT INFORMATION 23-066A 9-1-23 OHW SETBACKS PC Exhibit D N - 'N ao o -a-, 91 1. 4 it way \. 14, BLj- V -V -kc, Lzp, ro P;T-- j*IpwLt-b ti ■� .• • ` 4� �6� " �L `• . 1 ti -. f�dLr 1 J ` ti� 1 ■ ti ■ ` r 7 ji �� — NOW — — t•. m r i� — J MLy 1 12 4 1� ..i �F '�p _ _ =• rL ti4 — City of Orono �oHardcover Calculationshy s� Property Address_ SHO a�` Prepared by: Date: 2'' 3_ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier S Step i;ISTIPiG HRDCQ�� In the following to dentify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. fey to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) Exam !a (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A S.F- 3 S.F. C '.l S.F. D - S.F. E Uzdi k 53 S.F. F '401S.F.G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. i S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T ST.- U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. Total EAstin Hardcover S F Exct dablwMardcover (Saer ily Code Sec 73.1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. _L31- Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line Z from line t �+ � � 2 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)+(4)] ? 7� C3 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an mfonnation packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions wilt prevail. Rage 6 of 9 �'�l'' �) .• Sar . ' � V A I. ;� , �,q.. .ire f 5 ��.• ` - il� � e•C {fir,• `�• I'. ` fi`�*li I I ^ *�,„•• 4 - ..'.a '�.� 5p6M1 6J , `�'_''•�'• J•�d� .J 5r� + .. y�J��+...• � .. c .y �� -l�J�j' _q er•Y _'t.i ��t�>:�r � n+� � .. � - � •'S ,� ;��" ...1�.`; ki.' '�..L;" �•�, �1gpti r. y ... - . � ... .-.-.:7:?:;'7r.'�11"adw`7�tiY*[i.°.�c.4i.�•J'.11.•,e �•..s ..- . ...'_Vwe; �. orl Y d .",_4 L 3 v74 ddhL -� r ■ F: - ;.• AA WM" (0, _iM LL ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) -'( l ti . of c'l 017 �— L<<c�L [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 31i -i 0-i � L. -,tae- s+ also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Property Owner Date I (we) If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form — January 2023 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM i (we) LRA5 � ULf N LA RIM of �>W 69 C , L A w Si. [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _-�KV-b— also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. rty Oker Date I (we) er l ( Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form - January 2023 i O� O O CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL L`gkESITO NO. '� ? A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 SUBDIVISION B, SECTION 78-282 AND SECTION 78-1288 FILE NO. 04-3041 WHEREAS, Rebecca Lyrui Holzem, a single person (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3407 Eastlake Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 8, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 Subdivision B to allow lot width and lot area variances for a property 4,180 s.f. in area and 44' in width where 2 acres and 200' of width are normally required; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 Subdivision B to allow a rear street setback of 15' where 50' is normally required, a creek setback of 41.5' where 75' is normally required, and a lake setback of 50' where 75' is normally required and side setbacks of 10' where 30' is normally required; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow hardcover within the 0-75' setback of 21.8% or 720 s.f. where 0% is nonnally allowed and hardcover within the 75'-250' setback of 47% or 414 s.f. where 25% is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3041. Page 1 of 5 .. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF T7 CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 2 Acres and a minimum lot width of 200'. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on August 16, 2004 and recommended approval of the variances based on the following findings: a. The property has 4,180 s.f. (0.096 Acre) in area and 44' in width. b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicant to make the property confonning in area or width. c. The property is served with municipal sewer. A single family residence has existed on the property for many years. d. 79% of the applicant's property is located within 75' of the creek and the OHWL of Lake Miiuzetonlca. e. Because the property is less than 10,000 s.f. in area it is allowed a 1,500 s.f. structural footprint absent other factors. Construction of a 864 s.f home accounts for 21.8% of hardcover within the 0-75' setback zone and 16% of hardcover within the 75'-250' setback zone. f. The applicant has proposed minimal driveway, and walk (and has forgone a deck) in order to limit the magnitude of the hardcover excesses. g. The size of the proposed residence and magnitude of hardcover variance is consistent with other approved development in the neighborhood. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Conunission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning Page 2 of 5 \`4kESH04/ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5: 2 2 � district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 Subdivision B to allow lot width, lot area, lake, creek, rear and side street setback variances, and variances to to Section 78-1288 to allow excess hardcover, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Plarming Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of 21.8% or 720 s.f.. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 414 s.f. or 47% per the proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non -hardcover surfaces. 4. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing inspection. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (August 23, 2005). Page 3 of 5 °-4� \`9kES80 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N0. --_ 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the teens of this resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant's heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 23"' day of August, 2004. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owne ( STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN �,,,6,� `�he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 2,34 day of a,,ugiist, 2004 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. �. RACHEL D0_1.7, l< p Y'� -- Notary Public - Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF TFkE 5$Y COUNCIL NO. The ,lyoregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this �-- day of 2004 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL Dc�-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this `� day of 2004 by Rebecca Lynn Holzem, a single person. ZD �` �L�� EEfUiSE M. LESKINE�J ° � � 4` ' �;�-t,,���. NOTARY PUBLIC - MfNN�SOTA }•> �tj. Puny COf*�ir551�,1 F•.;p;f•:a J' . �� Notary Public Page 5 of 5 8 -Mh1JhUUA HULZEM IN LOT 1, BLOCK 8, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETC HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EAST LAKE STREET O (933.2) (933.4) (933.7) O r� EAST 44.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Li 0 0 0 ft The East 44.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 8, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka PROPOSED DRIVEWAY W' LY LINE ..................... 44.0............... OF LOT 1 PROP. WALK .......... �. Ln 10.0 .... .. CD I O _ 10.0 ` (933.8) 0 NI TOP OF WELL= 6,0 78' SETBACK Q I (934.9) PROPOSED LINE � I HOUSE (933.8) #3407 o LOWEST FLOOR 00 a) �) I co933.5 00 ..10.0 24.0 10.0 ........... (933.8 (I o IL_ / (933.7)'. ( l �-- 929.4 CONT I CONTOUR'., ; 9 '=9293 5- 932— LINE I -93+ ;^ �_ {_ —930 i WEST 44.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Li 0 0 0 ft The East 44.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 8, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka RUN DATE: 08/15/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 05-117-23 13 0012 38 05-117-23 13 0043 38 05-117-23 14 0052 C P FLURY & M B FLURY JEANNE M BRAUN TRUST BARBARA JOANNE HUBER 3420 BAYSIDE RD 3444 EASTLAKE ST 3390 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHRISTOPHER P FLURY JEANNE M BRAUN BARBARA JOANNE HUBER MARGARET B FLURY 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3420 BAYSIDE RD UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FORT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23 13 0014 38 05-117-23 13 0044 38 05-117-23 14 0056 LYNN W WALSTEDT M T LEE & C S LEE J F LEHMEYER & T L LEHMEYER 3470 BAYSIDE RD 3424 EASTLAKE ST 320 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LYNN W WALSTEDT MICHAEL T LEE JOHN & TRUDY LEHMEYER 3470 BAYSIDE RD CATHERINE S LEE 320 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 3424 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0029 38 05-117-23 13 0045 38 05-117-23 14 0057 BARBARA J HUBER LYNN W WALSTEDT LOREN PARKS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 350 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA J HUBER LYNN W WALSTEDT LOREN PARKS 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3470 BAYSIDE ROAD 350 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0030 38 05-117-23 13 0046 38 05-117-23 14 0060 DANA S BRUMITT JEANNE M BRAUN TRUST ET AL D L GROTHAUS & E C GROTHAUS 3400 BAYSIDE RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3403 EASTLAKE ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 DANA S BRUMITT JEANNE M BRAUN DAREN L GROTHAUS 3400 BAYSIDE RD 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR ELLE C GROTHAUS LONG LAKE MN 55356 UNIT C 3403 EASTLAKE ST FT MYERS FL 33908 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0032 38 05-117-23 13 0052 38 05-117-23 14 0061 AMY J LAWIN S SCHMIT & J SCHMIT P A& K S SKOOG 3405 EASTLAKE ST 3415 EASTLAKE ST 280 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 AMY J LAWIN STEVEN SCHMIT PHILIP & KAREN SKOOG 3405 EASTLAKE ST JACQUELINE SCHMIT 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 3415 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0035 38 05-117-23 13 0054 38 05-117-23 14 0062 REBECCA LYNN HOLZEM T M ZIESMER & M T ZIESMER SUSAN A M GOHMAN TRUSTEE 3407 EASTLAKE ST 3440 BAYSIDE RD 330 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 REBECCA LYNN HOLZEM TODD M & MARIE T ZIESMER SUSAN A M GOHMAN 3407 EASTLAKE ST 3440 BAYSIDE RD 330 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23130036 38 05-117-23140030 38 05-117-23140064 C J LAPPEN & KALLYN BIALOWAS BILMA LLC A DAHLQUIST & R DAVIDSON 3409 EASTLAKE ST 315 CRESTVIEW AVE 3348 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHRISTOPHER J LAPPEN BILMA LLC AMY DAHLQUIST KALLYN BIALOWAS 315 CRESTVIEW AVE ROBERT DAVIDSON 3409 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 3348 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23130037 38 05-117-23140031 38 05-117-23140069 DIANE M PEREZ WENDY D SULLIVAN TRUST MICHAEL & MARILYN HUTHWAITE 3465 EASTLAKE ST 325 CRESTVIEW AVE 3382 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DIANE M PEREZ WENDY SULLIVAN MICHAEL & MARILYN HUTHWAITE P O BOX 106 325 CRESTVIEW AVE 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0039 38 05-117-23 14 0033 38 05-117-23 410010 TAMMARA L MADDREY BARBARA J HUBER HANKS BAY II LLC 3435 EASTLAKE ST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 475 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 TAMMARA L MADDREY BARBARA J HUBER HANKS BAY II LLC 330 PEAVEY RD 3390 BAYSIDE RD ATTN: ANDREW MILLS WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 475 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0042 38 05-117-23 14 0039 38 05-117-23 410022 HUNSLEY FAMILY JT REV TRUST MATTHEW LAMBRECHT J H MERIDETH & M B MERIDETH 3464 EASTLAKE ST 340 TONKA AVE 405 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK A HUNSLEY MATTHEW LAMBRECHT MARYANN & JOHN MERIDETH NANCY E HUNSLEY 340 TONKA AVE 405 OXFORD RD 3464 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 08/15/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 05-117-23 410023 JOHN D WITHROW & J D WITHROW 425 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 JOHN D WITHROW JESSICA D WITHROW 425 OXFORD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 3514, Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 8/15/2023 0 Buffer Size: 500 Map Comments: 3407 Eastlake St 3474 3444 X65 las , 250 7-1 285 35 ,Fi:, , Ip 280 255 3QU 314 -1 AIM 3dB4 [� 3444 7.) 3424 tuf 435 3415 U U IQ o r W. 3 425 tai 1WH M 0 50 100 200 Feet I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 03/07/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/15/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 05/17/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: September 18, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000047, Erica Hway with Landschute o/b/o Alexander Johnston, 2245 French Lake Road, Variances - Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances from the 150 -foot lake building setback, hardcover within the 150 -foot lake setback, and retaining walls within the Shore Setback in order to construct a new home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home on the property and construct a new home in a similar location. The existing home does not meet the required 150 -foot lake setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of French Lake. The proposed home will be no closer to the lake than the existing home and the proposed patio will also maintain a similar setback of the existing patio. The applicant has proposed to move the home and the building massing away from the lake reducing the existing encroachments within the lake setback by constructing a smaller home, however the applicant is requesting to square off the existing patio space to support a pool within the lake setback. Additionally, to support the proposed patios and accessory structure improvements for the site the applicant is proposing new retaining walls within the 150' Shore setback. These retaining walls are over 100' away from the OHWL of French Lake and should not impact the natural vegetation or shoreline of the lake. All other setbacks including the average lakeshore setback have been met. The total hardcover on the site meets the requirement, however the proposal includes new hardcover within the 150 -foot lake setback. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances in order to build a primary building within the 150 -foot lake setback line and to construct new hardcover within the 150 -foot lake setback. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the existing conditions of the property as practical difficulties. The existing topography, existing vegetation and existing septic system limit the placement of a new house. The applicant is proposing to maintain similar setbacks of the existing home, which are nonconforming. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The current home on the property does not meet the required 150 -foot lake setback. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home in a similar location and decreasing the building footprint and massing within the lake setback. The proposed home is approximately 2,000 square feet smaller in footprint than the existing home. The patio and pool spaces are capturing the original building and patio footprint from the existing house. The new patio and retaining walls within the lake setback are necessary due to the topography of the property. The commission should ask the applications for additional testimony regarding the accessory structures on the site including tennis court, pool, patios and retaining walls. The existing conditions of the property including the topography, vegetation, and septic system limit the placement of the new home. All other setbacks and zoning regulation are proposed to be met. The total hardcover on the property is proposed to be reduced slightly from 20.8% to 19.3%. FILE #LA23-000047 September 18, 2023 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 — Setbacks: RR -1113 District Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 50' 73.9 73.9' East Side 30' 148' 149' West Side 30' 129' 155' Lakeshore 150' House — 125.4' Patio —108' House —125.4' Patio —102.7 Average Lakeshore Met 27,544.5 s.f. 22,896 s.f. lection 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1B District Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 110,178 s.f. (2.5 acre) 432'@ 150'/ 416' @ OHWL Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 110,178 s.f. (2.5 acre) Allowed: 22,035.6 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 6,830 s.f. (6.2%) Total Area Proposed: 4,489 s.f. (4.1%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Total Area Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 27,544.5 s.f. 22,896 s.f. 21,219 s.f. Tier 1 110,178 s.f. (25 %) (20.78%) (19.26%) Applicable Regulations: 150 -foot Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) The property is located on French Lake which is classified as a natural environment lake per the City Code. Natural environment lakes require a 150 -foot setback from the OHWL. The existing home is approximately 125 feet from the OHWL and is nonconforming to the setback requirements. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new, smaller home in a similar location. The proposal will maintain the setback from the lake, but some of the massing of the home has been decreased within the setback. This can be seen clearly in Exhibit F, page AS1.01. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1680) The property has a maximum hardcover allowance of 25% of the total lot area. The existing conditions of the site meet the requirement at 20.78%. The proposal reduces the hardcover slightly to an overall hardcover of 19.26% for the site. Although the overall hardcover meets, the current and proposed site plans include hardcover within the 150 -foot lake setback. The City Code prohibits structures or hardcover, with some exceptions like lake stairs, within the required lake setbacks. The existing home is situated beyond the setback line at about 125 feet from the OHWL when a 150 -foot setback is required. Therefore, much of the existing home is within the setback. Additionally, the existing home has patios and a tennis court that encroaches into the required lake setback. The applicant is proposing to keep the existing tennis court as is. The applicant has proposed a new patio and pool in a similar location to the existing patio. The FILE #LA23-000047 September 18, 2023 Page 3 of 5 setback of approximately 108 feet will be reduced to approximately 103 feet. The new patio will be in a similar location, but will simply be squared off for better usability. Retaining Wall Variance (Section 78-1279) The City Code does not permit retaining walls within a required lake setback. The applicant is proposing several retaining walls to support the proposed patio and pool. The retaining walls are over 100 feet from French Lake and should not negatively impact the natural environment of the lake. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variances for the construction of a new single-family home are supported by practical difficulties. Much of the existing home is located within the 150 -foot lake setback. Therefore, the current property has hardcover within the required lake setback as well. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new, smaller home in a similar location. The new home will maintain the existing setback of 125 feet from the OHWL. The proposed patio will also maintain a similar location to the existing patio, with a slightly reduced setback due to the new patio being a different shape. The new patio will require some retaining walls within the lake setback, which is not permitted by the City Code. The placement of the new home on the lot is limited by the existing topography, tree coverage, and existing improvements. The applicant is preserving the existing septic system and is proposing to keep certain elements of the site including a detached garage and tennis court. The construction of a new home is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties of the property's existing conditions. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a new single- family home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The overall reduction in total hardcover and bringing much of the massing of the home away from the lake are in line with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new single-family home is a reasonable use FILE #LA23-000047 September 18, 2023 Page 4 of 5 of the property. The proposed home is over 2,000 square feet smaller in footprint than the existing home and there is an overall reduction in hardcover. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing house was not built by the current owners. The existing conditions of the lot including the location of the existing structures and improvements were not created by the new landowner. Additionally, the topography and vegetation further limit the placement of a new home and that is not a circumstance created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a new single-family home is supported by practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. The proposed home is smaller in size and the overall hardcover is reduced. The setbacks from the lake remain similar to that of the existing home and improvements. The average lakeshore setback is also conforming for this property. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the RR -113 District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing conditions of the property including the existing location of structures, septic system, topography and vegetation a are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the topography and location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal is to construct a new single-family home in a similar location and maintain the current setbacks. However, the house size will be reduced and the overall hardcover will be reduced on the site. This criterion is met. FILE #LA23-000047 September 18, 2023 Page 5 of 5 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances allow for the construction of a new home in a similar location to that of the existing home. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has reached out to neighboring property owners, but has not provided any acknowledgement forms. No public comments have been received regarding this project. The applicant should be asked if they have received support from the neighbors. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Are the accessory structures of the pool, retaining walls and patio reasonable and necessary? 4. The Commission should discuss the existing nonconforming elements of the site that are proposed to remain including the tennis court and detached garage. Could removal of any nonconforming structures bring the property closer to conformance. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff is supportive of the requested variances from the 150 -foot lake setback, hardcover and retaining walls within the 150 -foot lake setback for the construction of a new single-family home. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit F. Plans Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit G. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit H. Aerial Map Exhibit D. Proposed Survey Exhibit 1. Mailing List & Map Exhibit E. Existing Survey 9/1/23, 10:22 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 08/23/2023 Address: 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1011723220004 Land Use Number: LA23-000047 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: ALEXANDER L JOHNSTON Address: P O BOX 82 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 Name: Erica Hway Applicant: Company: Landschute Address: 202 Water Street Suite 202 Excelsior, MN 55331 erica@landschute.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Jon Monson Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: New Single Family Home - Lake Front Setback Variance Request Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12220342&WorkOrder_ID=876... 1 /1 9/1/23, 10:23 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000047 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: It is reasonable, and preferable, to allow for the continued use of a property in the same manner and location as it has been used. There is no other location on the property suitable or available for development, and the proposed design maintains the existing patterns of the site. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: There are several limitations on the property which constitute practical difficulties. The condition of the existing home, permitted setbacks, the topography, the location of the existing vegetation, and the location of an existing septic system create a significantly limited buildable area. These circumstances are beyond the control of the homeowner. The existing home itself is beyond repair and is not conducive to being replaced in an exact manner. As per the septic designer, whose letter you can find attached to this application, the existing septic system cannot be altered, and there is no alternative location for it. Upon considering alternative locations for the pool deck relative to the structure, no alternative position could be achieved due to the septic system requirements. Furthermore, it is important for the preservation of the character of the property to retain the existing wooded areas on the east side of the property, which further limits the buildable area. The topography is limiting in that the existing home is built upon high ground, and the grade slopes down both to the lake and to the street. Positioning the home on this higher grade is important for allowing water to flow naturally away from the building and to create proper access to the home. In addition, it is the most visually preferable position for the home, allowing for the existing views of the lake to be maintained as well as the character of the property as perceived from beyond the property. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed design is intended to fit into its neighboring context in terms of mass, scale, style, and positioning on the lot. The goal is to preserve the existing character of the property. In addition, it is important to the essential character of the locality that the existing wooded and naturally vegetated areas on the property remain, which is a significant goal of the proposed design. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations have no impact on the positioning of the home on this property. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12220342&WorkOrder_ID=876... 1/2 9/1/23, 10:23 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Response: The proposed use is permitted in the RR -1B zoning district as a single-family residence. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The conditions of the property, including the septic system, limiting setbacks, vegetation, and topography are unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Setbacks are intended to provide a framework for what can be built, and it is uncommon for the setbacks in combination with a septic system to be so limiting that a reasonable buildable area does not exist, as is the case on this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: It is the substantial property right of an individual to be able to use a property in a manner consistent with how it is intended to be used and how it has historically been used. By not granting the variance, the use of the property would be highly substandard. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting this variance is in compliance with the intent of the Zoning Code in every way, including in consideration of the health, safety, comfort, and morals of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: This application demonstrates that it is necessary to grant this variance in order for the property owner to be able to preserve the use of this property in a reasonable manner. https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_I D=12220342&WorkOrder_I D=876... 2/2 Wednesday, August 23, 2023 ILD SCUTE • Architects • Builders • Designers • Real Estate Practical Difficulties Narrative To the Staff, Mayor, Council, and Planning Commission of the City of Orono, Landschute is the Architect and Contractor representing the future homeowners of the property at 2245 French Lake Road. The property at 2245 French Lake Road currently contains a structure that is nonconforming and in disrepair, and it is beyond impractical to consider remodeling. The homeowners would like to replace the current structure with a new home and are requesting a variance for the lake front setback. Both the scale and style of the proposed home are in harmony with the essential character of the locality. The proposed home design is smaller than the existing home in all dimensions, including hardcover. The proposed home is no closer to the lake than the existing home, and the proposed patio and pool deck are no closer to the lake than the existing patio. As such, the proposed design is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance, specifically relative to the requirements for replacing existing, legally non -conforming structures and in that the massing of the new structure is nowhere near the maximum allowed size of structures in the RR -113 zoning district. In addition, there are wooded and naturally vegetated areas of the property which are critical to maintaining the essential character of the locality. It is a goal of the proposed design to maintain these areas. There are a number of practical difficulties in designing a conforming structure that are beyond the control of the property owners. Firstly, it is highly impractical and undesirable to build a new home within the parameters of the existing, nonconforming structure. Secondly, the allowable footprint designated by the required setbacks, in combination with the existing vegetation, topography, and septic mound, is incredibly limiting, making it nearly impossible to build in a reasonable and conforming manner. The existing septic system that cannot be moved or altered, which creates significant limitations as to where any soil disturbance may take place on the west side of the property. The survey notes the toe of the septic mound, which has a 20 - foot setback to where a disturbance can take place. As such, the pool deck and retaining walls cannot move any closer to the septic mound than what is proposed (see attached letter from the septic designer). Further explanation of the practical difficulties can be found within the responses to the questions in the Practical Difficulties section of the variance application form. The proposed design for this property, as evidenced by the statements above, demonstrate that this is a reasonable request for granting a variance. The neighbors have also shown their support. Thank you for your consideration. �uruP�ur� C�Pr�ifirtt�P Site Plan Survey For: LANDSCHUTE GROUP Property located in Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota REN � N F cmp - 936.7 mv= .56' , 937.3 N' eaS• 115 Q _-936 =ir�p9�5.fJO� \ 24.3 _114 - M 93,9--Elec. A K E 93 � 0 A D 937.6 Cut & Fill Calculations Cut I Fill I Total Net 668 Cubic Yards 1214 Cubic Yards 1 455 Cut Cubic Yards Disturbed Area = 15,810 Sq. Ft. 82°00'00" E 60.( 9 37.7 `�$°QQ•QQg/�-- 7 p J 74°0 N6 - - V -0„� O )0" E 84.22 ----- / 940: r ,, 6 Oo 67 o ' 940. ----'' i' �� 0�0 -- 938.4 9A0 �� Q•, ----' 9 5.6 F, -- i i 943.6 `9 7.5 • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only 64,956,5q ft Denotes Existing Contours 3, 080 sq ft Denotes Proposed Contours X000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Basis for Denotes Surface Drainage bearings is Patio allowance assumed Denotes Tree to be Removed Proposed Hardcover within / 50' Proposed Hardcover Total Lot setback Lot Area l /0, l 78 sq ft Area Below 64,956,5q ft /-louse 3, 080 sq ft Setback Patio/Steps 2,397 sq ft Existing Garage 1,273 sq ft 07.1 8.23 wetland delineation 08. 17.23 Average Lake Shore Setback Line'. Existing Shed l 36 sq ft Patio allowance - l 00,5q ft Concrete Walk 142 sq ft House 901 sq ft Conc. pad 16,5q It Concrete pad l 6.5q ft Driveway 595 sq ft rear Deck 582 sq ft X38.6 s / x D l00 Meter Address: 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 7r, I I - - � 8' 947. lox Existing Tennis 6,26 / sq ft Patio including 2,532.5q ft elevations to be verified by builder. NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. 94/.2 �'' � � ` 4 Court 07.1 8.23 wetland delineation 08. 17.23 Average Lake Shore Setback Line'. 08.22.23 Trees to be removed Gr ry R. rasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 938.2 938.9 -' I 94 - Gas X X 5 2 7, 18„ 944 I Total l 0, 070 sq ft patio allowance - l 00 sq ft j I 940.0 MeterN N 43 3. 942 942 - - - ` Percentage l 5.50% Lo �'arage 40.4 - - S X �� Tennis Court 7,776 sq ft jO SBL �' i� 944. ' - 1611 ` 94 SB Bituminous � 944. � °i 8' ' 40 3�0 tJ d 42/ 937.1 Ti er Wall � Deck q ft x 9 /.5 94`I' l4" < I� Paver 508 s q ft /2.6 2 ,� __-- - I ' Dra/nage ` lied - - - 94 / k k f 58 9 ` 9�� - Ik 43. 942 4°2 tw93,5.4 t 3,9 � ` ` Drive Lae 5,0 2 sq ft nt 153.1 24.2 939.7 bw937. l 3 0 1 Y q I 42.9 X SBL - - - 4p 14' ,. a / 2" 15 ` ` - I x 4 Deck 1 - = - - - - - _ Percen 19.26% ., N � - � 1 943. I I _ _ _ - SBSBL I `'�4 .3'-��.944.3 � Egr S - �--' � ul 945. I tage I Q � ---- 11 o T.. ? o ` -� ` ` 946.69 Proposed First Floor Elevation 9 5. 5: 1tw M ` �� j �� �� 945.5 Proposed Garage Floor ti,._gq4 bw9 N-B�iildi 'g im_ sions shown O I 94 0 z �' pet dd File o l \ �` ` ` 936.67 O I c L \' -' P � v \ \ I � � � Proposed Basement Floor �{j I Q J 4 944. a t l 0 r 4'10 3 4" SB N O I� x 944.3 3 3 14'0" i Opo 0 9� / I ` ` Type of Building N O Pr osed c 936.0 top mound `--- -- Ce 6,0,. c 24'0" Yl 65.0 I Full Basement Walkout 6.2 ~ 945. X cantilever ca Septic SBL Conc. I 944.4 G vz co M 14'� 1/4" ro ad 0� I LU ` I proposed M to B� a m ,� N o 0 945.0 = G I - L34 top m�und I Se do 3 ' _ I 9 .5 946 4 p SBL 94° U 0� I O x _- -' X 943. l x c ��t r� 946.9 X 947.5 I I � W I i �� ,' .� ao Pop/ I ,�' ���� ,� o� Pa o 9 I CO I 4. 46.5 ' proposed ' o i 3 - -946,9-45. We// �� x X S fop mound .g 946945.6 9 ° �� �� �� ,' Septic ao 8 O 1 jam- �' �' 40.8 940 39.5 \ �/94g- Z 51 944.--- j 9�2 Septic specbon Pip gag 938.6 x - - - - - - _ 943. / I \ 946.8 ' ®-_ X ----- °I i x 936.2 1 -- 945.6 t --- -----' _- 940.2 44.9// 936.8 I -- I --� --___- �-- Septic --- � x �� \x/ , I - --_, I I - ��T - 945.e X94 .3 ,-------- - \ I ---- �Se tic - - w 940 /9 .6 I - I 93 .4 i p - ' \ `- - A 94 .O xli 3 .4 i----- \ x94. 939.6 x 934 i' i X.0 `-----_ 935.9$ ` --_--_ 9 4 ----- \ x 934.5 -0 26; - \ J37_. X 70 o 2195 French Lake Road j940.7 -' 93 6 r o y ---' ----`_ --_-�---------------- I Q x i 933.0 ----1\l 56606'58" E 169.53 Meas. l --- Plat -'--------- - --------- -�;----- _ 9 /. l 602848 E73 930.81 i 93/.9 WL - M-'937..-2 930. W� 930.2 Q•4 7.0 931. X 96.3 �� e i931. l ----- 93 . l 30. d 93ab"� het , �� xI i 0,00P1'I i AWL /.3 x ---- 36.8 Q O\ x94 ./ % a5, j9 5U z I 9 9 �e , 3/.5 O.H.W. Line ` c� ` m I g2 937r� 1902 ��� �� �� 36.e ---------�-- L I \x,06 ��/ X93/.9 3/.3 4�.1 N66°�/ 93 French Lake 944.5 I �) 6. i 94 j �1 9 AOs Meas�D red 05/02/2023N� X 930.26 930.3 94SBL - x r \ SBL i i i' SBL SBL ` 2 i r w SBL 2285 French Lake Road B d 9 i 945.2 x e 93� ° ' 37 of a d SBL SBL SBL RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential \ Note: Deck location not to scale j I' ' ' e SBL -i �'� i SBL �� 932.0 SBL SBL AVERAGE LAKE 5110RE 5ETBAOK LINE � Building Setback Requirements 4 .4 44.6 I SBL Front = 50 feet x \ 944.3---- --__ ; I i' SBL SBLSide Interior_ e et Side Street 30 etSetbacks to OHW 930.SOS l Wetland Delineation by K•/olhaug Environmental Servies Company dated 07/10/2023 Rear = 50 feet X ' OHWL = 150* 2285 French Lake Road = 45.7 feet to Deck Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer 2245 French Lake Road = 109.9 feet to Deck ' p * 2195 French Lake Road = 38.2 feet to Deck r French Lake Located in Flood Zone "A"er I OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as ----- - 1 i FEMA Map 27053CO304F dated 11 /04/2016defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback Average Setback = 64.6 feet - - - - - - - - - - - - Legal Description from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. -- _________--- Project No. 90348A Scale: 1 rr = 30' 1 certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my ' 930.7 - - _ _ _ - - - NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Lot 1 Block 1 direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under _ _ _ ------ Proposed building information must be checked with Drawn By the laws of the State of Minnesota approved building plan and development or grading JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE F.B.No. 1131-44 Xy plan before excavation and construction. Proposed grades shown on this survey are interpolations of proposed contours from the drainage, grading and/or development plans.DEMARC Hennepin COUrity, Minnesota Address: 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN Surveyed this 10th day of August 2023. rev 05.05.23 wetland 08.30.23 city comments 05.22.23 tenn15 court NOTE: The relationship between proposed floor elevations to be verified by builder. NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com Signed 07.1 8.23 wetland delineation 08. 17.23 Average Lake Shore Setback Line'. 08.22.23 Trees to be removed Gr ry R. rasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 F:\survey\johnstons french lake - hennepin\1-1 johnstons french lake - hennepin\01 Surveying - 90348\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwc �uruP�ur� (�Pr�ifirtt�P • Denotes Found Iron Monument Existing Conditions Survey For: O Denotes Iron Monument Ej Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only \ Denotes Existing Contours LANDSCHUTE GROUP 0 A � 937.6 _S 82000'0 _' GJ� �" E 6 0 ' i �, Denotes Proposed Contours Property located in Section A K E 0.0 32, Township 117, Range 21, 937 .g 37 7 r'6o��,00 8 _ 0 \ S ,4°00,00 ' Basis for x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Hennepin County, Minnesota ___ w` p tY, F E N / 4 - , : N / i F 0 bearings is 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation 9 N 86°40'00" E 84.22 x 940. l'r _ 6 .00 assumed �{; \ -.EEjLDenotes Surface Drainage cmp ��-i -- i 8 _ _ �' i �� S - 936.7 nv= 58' 3�. - - -- ,' ®hse - 670 940. --- ' �� O)0 938.4 940 945. 6 �� Existing Hardcover within l50' Hardcover i - - - 0 setback Lot Area l l 0, l 78 sq ft 937.3 N �3 30 � 5 �O p p � ' � 4S 947.5 as _ 936;;x=9�5.�0 24.3 Me 943.6 _ 0, Area Below 64, 958 s ft 109 r 938 Dec. - - - T Setback q Residence 5,325 s� ft 'i `X35.6 ox House 3,017- q ft 6, e 1,273 s ft x Meter _ _ 7 IShed 136 sq ft 941.2 � - 4 ' 947 Upper Patio l , 20 / sq ft Front Porch 5 / sq ft 938.2 rej 936.9C 94 J r x Gas \ 5 24 7 / g 94 Lower Patio 447 sq ft Cant. l 5 sq ft I 940.0 Meter N N 940.4 43 3. 9 942 - - - Front Patio 15 sq ft Concrete l 2 sq ft I h 6 , x94 Concrete 58 sq ft 0 ara3e SB w 40.2 S /tw94l.3 i/ 944. ' 8, 4� \\ ` Patio allowance - l00 sq ft Concrete / 6 sq ft ____ ' bw94/.2 Bituminous ` 939.4 944.0 37 0 1 Sidewalk l 52 s ft ' T9 0 -g� 2 \ 94 S8\- 94 1.5 _ _ - � 937. T i e r wall I J � �xistmg Tennis 6, 26 / sq ft q ' xl \ _ _ x 12.6 ' _ - 944 - l 4" < I\ Steps 44 sq ft tw939. _ _ _ - - - I ` Court Deck 129 s ft Drainage ` SB hed bw940. ' - 94 / I Total l O, 84 / sq ft q nt 24 2 9 9.4 43. 942' `�2 / I \\ Percentage 16.69% Upper Patio 1,20/ sq ft 42.9 153. l 939.7 1 \ Lower Patio 447 sq ft I / 2" 15 \ Front Patio 203 s ft X S8� - _ 40 25.2 tw9 I x .4_ Deck-tw942.4 - 94 _7 ` _ _ \ \ rice - 943. Patio allowance l 005q ft ' SB SBL I I � \� Front Walk 2 l O sq ft I ..�-���944.3 -- _--' � ��� Q \ bw942.4 '-- Boulder __-- 945.6 I \ Driveway 5,774 sq ft I - Walls \ 94-56 \ I \ Tennis Court 7, 767 sq ft O I -944 " - - o �.. i�, nc. V `v �� Deck 133 sq ft O I 944. c / v I\ \ I J � 944.9 � � Sgt. 9�3. I p c \ I I \ � Total 22, 896 sq ft (0 I Q x 944.3 v o /10" a ` Percentage 20.78% N E x ` j 938.0 OIL- = 5 L ° 94.'1.1'65.0 N I 6.2 ~ 945.5 s8 X 3.0 I _ t � cI C14 I \ G e � °B Re5ldence No. J I LLJ I tw944 to55-Walls - C)bw94 53.9 /. 11 O 45.01 94 s O toD1 9 .5 -1 942.8 Ow \\ \ N I x x / bw942�' tw945.4 946.9 x947.5 I 0 \\ a ' I W I 8� 'tw94 /.3 26.6 - Uw943.4 9 o n ctw947.6 g 9 I \ \\ I bw9399939.7 CO 5 W94 C. 0 _ / l \\ \\ (.0 I 4. 46. 3 _ _ 4. We// � x \ x �. 9 0.9 F o ` a - 946345.6 9 d� I gi Cx 34' ` 3.-t o CV 94b o 39.5 all ------------ C) Z 51 v 94� -tw945. l 944. 11 bw942.8----_tw945.4 9 septic spection Pipe 936.6 x bw944: D - - - _ 94.x. l 1 \ \ \ 945.6 946.0 _ ® x x 936.8 936.2 1 _ 1 -- ------ -----\ _- 940.2 --_\ -_-' -- Septic ---- x x/ i l I - x94 .3 945.5 '--------- j septic ' g0 9 6 I 93 .4 i' / - --- ---- 94 .0 Xl I 3 .4 x94. 939.8 x i / 934.0 1----- 935.9 9 .4 __--------- x I i _ -934--- 934 \ 934.5 26' _ \937_. - B l d g -' x 936 -935.4 x I 7.0 I --- _ �x - ' \ ----, - 940.7 Q X93 6 i - - \- ----8------ _ I i 933.0 ----N BB°06'58" E /69.53 Meas. 170.00 Plat �'---------- - ------------ - o `\ ; , --- 48" 1 ,rte v ' �� - ---- 93/.9 9 /. / WL 930.2 E73 930.8 q•4 vv vvv 7.0 �� -- Q ` 936.3 e 93/.4 93/.1930. WL _ n o I \\ x ` PIa� ,lin i x 30. �la�d o I v i �0 ey ' WL 1.3 �e q `50 36.8 Q x 94 ./ I ; a9 z M6 - �' 3/.5 O.H.W. Line ��h 6) I 9g \ / 2� V A \--------- 6-- I 2 \ 9371E 19� �� X 631.9 /.3 6°2 i French Lake \ ` 40. / N I l 9 \` 930.3 \ 944.5 548 4 i x 94 % j �l 9 Os Measured 0510212023DNR) 930.26 x\\ SBL SBL 33. '51 i / i SBL SBL i r / SBL X i i e e f337. l 8" i 0 d SBL SBL \ \ - B l d g I - 945.2 939 e t a SBL SBL \ Note: Deck location not to scale I ; -q ,' SBL \\ 932.0 SBL SBLAVERAGE LAKE 5NORE SETBACK LINE 4 .4 44.6 \ I SBL Property Zoned RR -1B, One Family Rural Residential Property Zoned RR -1B, One Family Rural Residential - 944.3_ ---- SBL SBL Q €-c-k_ - - - - - -''i SOS= Building Setback Requirements 930. / - _ _ - � � � � Building Setback Requirements Wetland Delineation by Klolhaug Environmental 5ervie3 Company dated 0711012023 Front = 50 feet Front = 50 feet X I / Side Interior = 30 feet Side Side IntStrerior 3030 feet Side Street = 30 feet - - - - ---- ,r' Rear= 50 feet ------------ _ I_,-' ,'9 e OHWL= Rear= 50 feet feet OHWL= 150* Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer -French Lake Located in Flood Zone "A" per *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as 1 930.7 _ _ _---'"" FEMA Ma 27053C0304F dated 11 /04/2016 defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback ---- -- p from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. Legal Description Project No. 90348A Scale: 1 " = 30' 1 certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my Lot 1, Block 1Drawn B direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under F.B.No. 1131-44 y 2-9the laws of the State of Minnesota JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE Address: 2245 French Lake Road Surveyed this 1 st day of May 2023. Hennepin County, Minnesota Orono, MN NOTE: The only easements rev 05.05.23 wetland 8.30.23 city comments DEMARC shown are from plats of 05.22.23 tennis court record or information LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 07.1 8.23 wetland delineation provided b Client. 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 08.1 7.23 Average Lake Shore Setback Line'. Signed p y Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com regory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 F:\survey\johnstons french lake - hennepin\1-1 johnstons french lake - hennepin\01 Surveying - 90348\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base di SHEET INDEX ARCHITECT & BUILDER 2023 I '` General Drawings �- r : �., •. I P. � � � '` � A0.01 A0.02 Cover Sheet Symbols &General Notes LANDS(un TE ''1'�`. ,�� �. F , • _ A0.03 Existing Photos • • • • Architects Builders Designers heal Estate -•"' r t _ s i.rF FTI rAS1.01 =! Architectural Site Plans 202 Water St. #202 ` W ` •r. r�_ - - � �. ••;� � Architectural Site Plan Excelsior, MN 55331 AS1.02 Enlarged Site Analysis (952) 470-7416 ` Builder License: BC002303 • x.f 44 -r I L °; F Plans - New Construction COPYRIGHT NOTICE I� A1.01 Lower Level Plan $r _ .. r — :. * I A1.02 Main Level Plan All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This _= _— "";'�, �. . _ ■! — :*. A1.03 Upper Level Plan copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to * J++, _- __ J♦�� °. — ..--� __ ■� ■! _ __ _ -- — -- ' !A �■ ■■ Jim■ ,. , _ , A1.04 Roof Plan be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is -- unauthorized and strictly (without } —.—-� — --_ _ _ T ■ ;.; F - Elevations prohibited A2.01 Exterior Elevations Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section " – �" — I - '�. �� ■ ■om NN_ ��� �� �� �■ r�� ■� ■: — IP F , y� A2.02 Exterior Elevations 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of Sol 7�w_ NNEONE 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to _ ___ overall form as well as the arrangement of _ -= �� — ,F i spaces and details of the design. Under such these protection, unauthorized use of plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as - well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. - - -�_� -- - .,.,t � .* •4 PROJECT - - HULL RESIDENCE V. - +qL.F J� 1p New Home F FF CLIENT NAME . - . .. _ .. �_- f . - - •:,'.f. _ . s • ` F � .. .'fes � r � ': � � '; } 14 - -Lei 5r r' ji• F . � I hand John Hull Exterior Perspective (From Driveway) Location Map PROJECT ADDRESS 32245 French Lake Road NOT TO SCALE SCALE: 1" = 50' 0 20' 50' 100' Orono, MN 55391 PROJECT INFORMATION PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 r DRAWN BY: ELH OCCUPANCY: IRC -1, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING ZONING DISTRICT: RR -1 B - One Family Rural Residential ISSUE HISTORY TOTAL BUILDING AREA ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR FLOOR AREA 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission Lower Level, Finished Area 1,144 Main Level, Finished Area 2,002 k` Second Level, Finished Area 1,003 4,149 ft2 ` ` !■! ■M� = i�--KNIT NM! — AMR-— - ■■[ ■� ■[■ - _ ��■ �� I son now ■■R ■�� -`� CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION ad— WN ■ no ■■ y II If - - - a7' 4• r *p - - - SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Cover Sheet Exterior Perspective (From Lake) 2 Ao.o1 NOT TO SCALE ABBREVIATIONS SPECIAL SYMBOLS SYMBOL KEY MATERIAL LEGEND GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECT & BUILDER A. B. A/C ADJ. AFF AFG AHJ APPROX. ARCH. BD B. 1. BIT. BLDG BLKG BM B.O.F. B.O.W. B.W.L. CAB CANT C. C. CL CIP CMU CONC CONT DBL Anchor Bolt Air Conditioning Adjustable Above Finished Floor Above Finished Grade Authority Having Jurisdiction Approximate Architectural Board Built -In Bituminous Building Blocking Beam Bottom of Footing Bottom of Wall Braced Wall Line Cabinet Cantilevered Center to Center Centerline Cast -In -Place Concrete Masonry Unit Concrete Continuous Double IN INSUL INT IRC LH LSL LVL Mech. M.O. MSBC MSRC O.C. PL PLF P.S.I. P.T. R REBAR REFR REINF READ RH RM R.O. SB Inches Insulation Interior International Residential Code Left Hand Laminated Strand Lumber Laminated Veneer Lumber Mechanical Masonry Opening Minnesota State Building Code Minnesota State Residential Code On Center Property Line Per Lineal Foot Pounds per Square Inch Pressure Treated Radius Reinforcing Bar Refrigerator Reinforced Required Right Hand Room Rough Opening g p g Steel Beam & @ x " % # +/- And At By Centerline Degrees g Feet Inches Percent Pounds/Number Plus or Minus NORTH ARROW WINDOW LABEL N WindID Direction of True North Window x DOOR LABEL ELEVATION MARKER x Door ID Drawing Reference Number x � Sheet Reference Number xx Nominal Door Slab Width -fix x x Ni l D omnaoor Slaeg Height i Slab H SECTION MARKER CEILING HEIGHT Drawing Reference Number x Sheet Reference Number xx Ceiling Height x x„ (Rough Framing) DETAIL MARKER ELEMENT ABOVE Drawing Reference Number 1 Element Above Sheet Reference Number A-101 Floor Plan Cut Planed — — — - L J ENLARGED PLAN MARKER5. HIDDEN ELEMENT Drawing Reference Number 1 Hidden Element--------- Sheet Reference Number A -1o1 CUT FILL SYMBOLS Earth E th ° ° ° Structural Concrete a ° ° ° ° Nonstructural Concrete Concrete Masonry Unit Nonstructural Brick Masonry Nonstructural Stone Masonry Steel Plywood Glulam Wood Siding or Paneling COVER FILL SYMBOLS Shingles (Material &Exposure May Vary) Wood Siding or Paneling & Orientation May Vary) (Spacing Y Y) Board &Batten Concrete Masonry Unit Brick (Bond May Vary) D Flagstone Limestone - Stacked Fieldstone Limestone - Stacked 0�0 1. 2. 3. 4. Current International Residential Code (IRC) and Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) shall govern. All Subcontractors and Vendors herein accept their respective responsibility for compliance. Plans are representational only and are subject to field verification. The Work shall include labor and material, not specifically indicated, which are necessary to complete the job in a manner which is consistent with Landschute standard practices. It is understood that the plans and specifications do not necessarily indicate all Work required for the full performance and completion of the Work. Inconsistencies in the quality or quantity of Work indicated shall be interpreted in accordance with Landschute standard practices and must be addressed prior to execution of the Work. Any request for extra charges shall only be valid if submitted and agreed to prior to the execution of Work. Commencement of Work constitutes acceptance of substrate. All work shall be performed in a neat, craftsman like manner with extra care and consideration given to protecting work already in place. Each party is responsible for repairing its own damage to the job and g its own debris to a designated area on the job site. for removing All tradesmen on the job are responsible for knowing and adhering to the above -outlined policies. If Subcontractor / Vendor fails to correct work or persistently fails to carry out work as required, Landschute may, by giving 48 hour notice, terminate the agreement, perform the work itself and deduct the costs from any balance owed to Subcontractor / Vendor. If, during the first year of occupancy, it is necessary for the Subcontractor / Vendor to repair its work as a result of © 2023 • Architects • Builder,.; • Designers • heal Estate :. 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used onlyb Landschute as it constructs the y project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to DIM DR DN DW EA ELEC EQ EW EXC Dimensions Door Down Dishwasher Each Electrical Equal Each Way Excavate SC SD SF Specs. SQ SL SIM. T&G T.O.B. Steel Column Smoke Detector Square Feet Specifications Square Spring Line Similar Tongue &Groove Top of Beam REVISION MARKER Revision Number (Refer to Revision Log) x LEVEL MARKER Reference Level Elevation (Main Level - 0'-0") U_01 oT RY JOIST LABELWood Joist Type x Joist Orientations �x Joist Spacing BEAM LINE Beam Type—x — — — — Flooring Gypsum Board Yp Carpeting Rigid Insulation 6. 7. deficiency in labor or material, it shall also repair any subsequent trade's work as to create a finished product. No payment for any subcontract labor shall be made until appropriate Certificates of Insurance, including coverage for both General Liability and Workers' Compensation are provided to and acknowledged by Landschute. Selections for finish materials, fixtures, equipment, and furnishings to be coordinated directly between Client and Landschute. overall form as well as the arrangement of g spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT EXT. Exterior T.O.C. Top of Curb FCO FD Floor Cleanout Floor Drain T.O.F. T.O.H. Top of Footing Top of Heel BEARING POST Spray Foam Insulation HULL RESIDENCE FDN. FFE Foundation Finished Floor Elevation T.O.J. T.O.M. Top of Joist Top of Masonry Bearing Post (Type & Size Varies) Batt Insulation FG FL Finished Grade Floor Level T.O.W. TRTD Top of Wall Treated New Home FRPF Fireproof TYP. Typical FT Feet U.N.O. Unless Noted Otherwise FTG Footing W/ With FURN Furnace W.C. Water Closet (Toilet) CLIENT NAME GYP Gypsum W.H. Water Heater H.B. Hose Bib W.I.C. Walk -In Closet Leigh and John Hull HVAC Heating, Ventilating, W/O Without and Air Conditioning W.S. Water Softener JST Joist YDS Yards PROJECT ADDRESS IBC International Building Code 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Symbols & General Notes A0.02 O O 0 0 M 0 0 90'0£6 Uollena13 aaleM X --- §"6£6 90'0£6 = £000/00/90 PaanseaW sy / 9"0£6 W (&NG NW dad) 0.0£6 = M � ' � X 6.6£6 0 g0,b X a I� D U a a� X a U// e./ (0, 6"L£6 0•a£6= ys 62 -:saw - 6V - ---- X �a�anS--� 00 0 X 6°0£6 - ------------- ` ��� X X t,6 aul l as o U S _-----------------_6;6£6 --------- aU \ --- - - - - - g6- --;----------- -------------------- - - - - - - - - s'6£6 _T 8� 9 - 85 90 88 N gZ - ----- -- - S ---= _.---------- a seen 85'69 3„ a o ££6 x -' X-------------------------------- 9�6 x 3£�_ X06 Z L£6 '„9Z 9'ti£6 X t,• £6 x -----------------6'.90 X X 8'6£6 X 0•ti£6 x 0 'O>t6ft £6 9 ” it6 OA6 9£6(('� 06" `C Q, 19661966�6£ 6 X X£ "6£6 6 bi�6 Z"Ob6 5 TENNIS COURT 0•L£6T IIeM dag1 X ---------- 6 EP6 6 9 �s ° 8.9"76 '00 /9 S Architectural Site Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' 8.9£6 "L£6 6 n v Z m CD X, 6 '£b6 6 'iyti6 OP6 „s- 6 8"'41,6o „ob £ ft „A6 17"'u7 ,6 6 'PP6 9 0A6 adido Ilaadsul agdaS ,0�0 6 LINE OF EXISTING ° z�6 LINE OF EXISTING LOWER PATIO UPPER PATIO I 66 X L ----I 9 9ft6 \i 20' MINIMUM I ' I 6 ; L •6£6 I ' I I LINE OF EXIST PATIO I L, X it6 X 6 XX 99� .L"t� 6 NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE I GRADE = 945 i POOL 150, S 8 • >5 9�6 X Ca I ---------------------I 1 ---s-------------- a ------ U Q O R M -7 7 31 EXIST. O o - 6_O 9y6 RESIDENCE m N FFE = 947.9 PATIO NEW RESIDENCE A , ' ML FFE = 946.69 POOL DECK GRADE 61 j GRADE = 945 LL FFE = 93 = 938.° (7'9 6 _ _ _ _ _�_ WALKOUT GRADE I I CANT BAY HOT I El GARAGE i i i TUB £'titi6 X X m = 6'tiv6 7 945.5 '--- - XL.ftt�6 I I I rn PP6 I I I w I --------- ------- - Q COVERED 9'9ti6 i PORCH W I I W I I I I I 6k6 L'6£6 6 •bi,6 X I I L--------- - 6•Zti6 L "6£6 EIRIVEWAY I WALK FAVER X z �z s z� luawese3 �fl Inn b6` ,, '------- PeLI '8 e5euleaQ I -- 6 i ��6 'I 9'Zd X X ti Oti6 X Zy6 0'"6 � 6Z£6 .0 50' S.B.L. a�eae� �% `' IV „V ' �C LINE OF EXIST. N DRIVEWAY delay X 0'0P6 --- ----- OP6 0'V6 Z"bti6 -_asLl� `7 Y X 6.0t,6 „noo-Q �� ------- , o a n Ch 0 10' 20' 40' 009 H 0 C ►Jc�s1:�� 9 tib x .x 0' ,1r6! 51 Z E SITE & ZONING INFORMATION ZONING DISTRICT: RR -1 B - One Family Rural Residential LOT AREA: 105,217 Sq. Ft. LAKE: FRENCH LAKE LAKE CLASSIFICATION: NE - Natural Environment O H W L: 930.0 ARCHITECT & BUILDER n gn9q LAND S VETTE • Architects • Builder,.; • Designers • heal Estate HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Architectural Site Plan AS1.01 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 202 Water St. #202 SITE NOTES ' 8"8£6 9'L£6 dlui Excelsior, MN 55331 STREET FRONT SETBACK: 50' ti"8£6 (952) 470-7416 LAKE FRONT SETBACK: 150' (unsewered properties) Builder License: BC002303 __---" SIDE YARD SETBACK: 30' COPYRIGHT NOTICE OHWL SETBACK: 150' '- ---- 'vim- ----daa , with requirements ofAJH. All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are WETLAND SETBACK: 25' or to Wetland Buffer the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 25% (26,304 Sq. Ft.) copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to 4. Gradin contours indicated on site Ian are to be verified b 9 P Y be used only by Landschute as it constructs the BUILDING HEIGHT: 30' project for its client. Any other use is certificate of survey for proposed site grading and retaining wall unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without locations. Landschute's express written permission) and 5. Retaining wall material and detailing to be determined at time subject to copyright protection under Section of installation. Retaining wall height is not to exceed 4 feet 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as y6 unless engineering is provided. amended December 1, 1990, known as the 6. Site stabilization to be 6" sod. Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 7. Slope final grade from foundation at minimum 2% slope. 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to 8. New plantings to be determined at time of installation. overall form as well as the arrangement of 9. Driveway and sidewalk materials to be determined at time of spaces and details of the design. Under such installation. protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Architectural Site Plan AS1.01 se,9 Z 8£6 6"8£6 delay 9'8£6-0e13 8C6 £1£6 SITE NOTES ' 8"8£6 9'L£6 dlui ti"8£6 1. Erosion control shall be installed in accordance with requirements ofAHJ °----" _____ '6 ----- --- - __;s=nUi Tree removal an repacem ent t be conducted In accordance '- ---- 'vim- ----daa , with requirements ofAJH. 9£6 3. Shoring shall be provided as necessary based on site conditions. L'L£ 4. Gradin contours indicated on site Ian are to be verified b 9 P Y 6 L£6 surveyor. Refer to proposed certificate of survey for proposed certificate of survey for proposed site grading and retaining wall locations. 5. Retaining wall material and detailing to be determined at time of installation. Retaining wall height is not to exceed 4 feet unless engineering is provided. 6. Site stabilization to be 6" sod. 7. Slope final grade from foundation at minimum 2% slope. 8. New plantings to be determined at time of installation. 9. Driveway and sidewalk materials to be determined at time of installation. HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Architectural Site Plan AS1.01 h4 7f b� �6 V606 0 "016 Ok6 X 9 "916 X Z "016 LINE OF EXIST. NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE EXIST. X 6'906 -----E—FC-6 X LINE OF EXISTING eP6 LINE OF EXISTING LOWER PATIO UPPER PATIO PP6 \ L ----I �� I � � I � I I I I I PATIO GRADE = 945 I _ � 50' S.B.L. - LINE OF EXIST. ` DRIVEWAY X 0 )1 C6 adid uo edsul jgdeo 20' MINIMUM L "6C6 � 5 Q L• O1 SJ 1 ' 10-7, 4 O X L "1�1�6 ------------- 1-'6E6 X SITE PLAN LEGEND NEW STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT OUTSIDE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT & OUTSIDE OF ALLOWABLE BUILDING SETBACK NEW PATIO AREA BEYOND EXISTING PATIO & STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING STRUCTURE ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 ED S VINE • Architects • Builders • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY IISSUEIDATE I ISSUED FOR 02 18/22/23 I Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Enlarged Site Analysis Enlarged Site Analysis SCALE: 1" =I 0' 0 5' 10' 20' AS 1.02 POOL POOLDECK TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR AREA ILower Level, Finished Area I IMain Level, Finished Area 1,144 M1 ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 EAND S VINE • Architects • Builder; • Designers • heal Estate Second Level, Finished Area I 202 Water St. #202 1,003 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 4,149 ft2 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull CIV 1 CK IHII'm IVICIV 1 U U U1 PROJECT ADDRESS I Io 2245 French Lake Road -oz Orono, MN 55391 OPEN RAIL 1 q C9 GUEST 1 M r-4° z'-6° ROOM PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 A3.01 ° 16 RISE 1 "64" a A3.01 �6-$ HALLWAY 6' 8" 0 VIII; O DRAWN BY: ELH UNEXCAVATED V GUEST BATH 00 /2 C9 C9 VI NQ � N� A2.01 ISSUE HISTORY 2 I I I I 2'-4" v I I I I N O O LOSE CLO O ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR I II II = U Z ® 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission III III LU V UNFINISHED m G/M II II � LL Ili III I II II II II I III III Iii Illi I III III II II I II II III III I I I a —� ° a s as a s a a a a s P a FRAMING NOTES GENERAL FRAMING 1. All dimensions are to face of rougecessaril h framingunless U.N.O. g g Y 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not ncoincide with wall CURRENT REVISIONS I° _ heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for REV DESCRIPTION ------ —------------ --— wall framing heights. b DECK ABOVE 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. 5. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, — — — — — — — electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. WALL FRAMING 1. Interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. w/ double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing walls to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated 2 1 lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. A3.01 A2.02 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 1/2" casing at all window and door openings. SCALE AS INDICATED FLOOR FRAMING 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure SHEET NAME treated lumber on sill gasket. 2. Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.O. Lower Level Plan 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided by Lower Leve I Plan ll 4. All beams to be flush U.N.O. 1 5. Floor assemblies to comply with SMRC R.302.13. A1.01 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. 1 A3.01 2 A2.01 TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR (Lower Level, Finished Area (Main Level, Finished Area ISecond Level, Finished Area FRAMING NOTES AREA 1,144 M1 1,003 4,149 ft2 GENERAL FRAMING 1. All dimensions are to face of rough framing unless U.N.O. 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not necessarily coincide with wall heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for wall framing heights. 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. 5. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 EAND S VINE • Architects • Builders • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION U UWALL FRAMING 1. Interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. w/ w-11 double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing walls to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated 2 1 lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. A3.01 A2.02 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 2'-0" 22'-0" 39'-6" 5'-6" 14'-0" 7 L 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 1/2" casing at all window and door openings. SCALE AS INDICATED FLOOR FRAMING 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure SHEET NAME treated lumber on sill gasket. 2. Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.O. Main Level Plan 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided Main Level Plan by 4. All beamlls to be flush U.N.O. 5. Floor to SMRC R.302.13. A1.02 assemblies comply with SCALE: 1/4" = V-0° ° 2 4 $ 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. '2\N,,1 A3.01 A2.01 Second Level Plan SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 8' 2 1 A3.01A2.02 TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR AREA ILower Level, Finished Area I 1,144 IMain Level, Finished Area M1 ISecond Level, Finished Area 1,003 4,149 ft2 FRAMING NOTES GENERAL FRAMING 1. All dimensions are to face of rough framing unless U.N.O. 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not necessarily coincide with wall heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for wall framing heights. 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. 5. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. WALL FRAMING 1. Interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. w/ double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing walls to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 1/2" casing at all window and door openings. FLOOR FRAMING 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure treated lumber on sill gasket. 2. Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.O. 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided by supplier. 4. All beams to be flush U.N.O. 5. Floor assemblies to comply with SMRC R.302.13. 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 EAND S VINE • Architects • Builder; • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Upper Level Plan A1.03 '2\N,,1 A3.01 A2.01 Roof Plan SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 8' 2 1 A3.01A2.02 ROOFAREA I ARCHITECT & BUILDER Top Surface Area © 2023 Roof -Asphalt 4,804 Roof - Rubber 243 I ROOF PLAN NOTES I 1. At nominally flat roof -to -wall conditions, adhere EPDM to wall sheathing and extend up wall 2'-0" beneath siding. 2. Penetrations to be flashed per manufacturer requirements. 3. Finish of flashing and drop edge to be determined at time of installation. 4. Roof shingle material and exposure to be determined at time of installation. 5. Gutter locations and selections to be determined at time of installation. ED S VINE • Architects • Builder; • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Roof Plan A1.04 +10'-1 3/4" 2 Second Level ±0" 1 Main Level -9'-10 3/4" -1 Lower Level West Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" OIL+10'-1 3/4" 2 Second Level +011 1 Main Level ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 LAND S VETTE • Architects • Builders • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION -9'-10 3/4" SCALE AS INDICATED -1 Lower Level SHEET NAME Exterior Elevations A2.01 North Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" +10'-1 3/4" 2 Second Level +0' 1 Main Level East Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 01L+10'-1 3/4" 2 Second Level 01L+0" 1 Main Level ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 LAND S VETTE • Architects • Builders • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Exterior Elevations A2.02 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2245 French Lake Road Prepared by: Demarc Date: 08-30-23 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: Existing Hardcover In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey(Square Length x Width Total Feet Example (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A Residence irregular 5325 S.F. B Garage irregular 1273 S.F. C Shed irregular 136 S.F. D Front Porch irregular 81 S.F. E Cant. irregular 15 S.F. F Conc. irregular 12 S.F. G Conc. irregular 58 S.F. H Conc. irregular 16 S.F. Sidewalk irregular 152S.F. Steps irregular 44 S.F. K Deck irregular 129 S.F. L Upper Patio irregular 1201 S.F. M I Lower Patio irregular 447 S.F. N Front Patio irregular 203 S.F. O Front Walk irregular 210 S.F. P Driveway 5774 S.F. Q Tennis Court 7,787 S.F. R Deck 133 S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existinq Hardcover Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): 22,996 S.F. L Patio Allowance -100 S.F. M S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line Ml 22,896 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 110,178 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 20.78% (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Addr ;ss: 2245 French Lake Road Prepared by: Demarc Date: 08-30-23 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A Residence irre ular 3,080 S.F. B Existina Gara a irre ular 1,273 S.F. C Existina Shed irre ular 136 S.F. D Concrete Walk irre ular 142 S.F. E Concrete oad rear irreaular 16 S.F. F Deck irre ular 582 S.F. G Patio includina pool irre ular 2,532 S.F. H Tennis irreaular 7,776 S.F. I Shed Deck irre ular 129 S.F. i Pavers 508 S.F. K Deck by Lake 133 S.F. L Driveway 5,012 S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): 21,319 S.F. Patio Allowance -100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 21,219 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 110,178 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 19.26% This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 RUN DATE: 08/23/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 10-117-23 210004 L R KLOMBIESB A KLOMBIES 1000 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55391 LINDSAY RB ANNA KLOMBIES 1000 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210006 S HONOUR & J PARSLEY HONOUR 2195 FRENCH LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 SCOTT M HONOUR JAMIE PARSLEY HONOUR 2195 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210008 WILLIAM R QUIRK/LISA M QUIRK 825 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM R QUIRK/LISA M QUIRK 825 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210009 DEBORAH WUNDERLICH SP G TR 2135 CARRIAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 DEBORAH WUNDERLICH TRUSTEE 2135 CARRIAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210011 R J BEDELL & S L BEDELL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 RYAN JBEDELL STACY L BEDELL 845 WILLOW DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0002 STACY L MARTIN 845 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55391 STACY L MARTIN 845 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0004 ALEXANDER L JOHNSTON 2245 FRENCH LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ALEXANDER L JOHNSTON US BANK AS AGENT P.O. BOX 64142 ST PAUL MN 55164 38 10-117-23 22 0010 JAMES HILLEGASS 2355 FRENCH LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 JAMES C HILLEGASS 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0011 ANNE M SHULL 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ANN M SCHULL 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0012 CHRISTIAN RAY & MADELINE RAY 2250 FRENCH LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTIAN RAY & MADELINE RAY 2250 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0014 JAMES HILLEGASS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 JAMES C HILLEGASS 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0015 ANNE M SHULL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ANNE M SHULL 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0016 CHARLES S & SUSAN H LANNOM 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 CHARLES S LANNOM 870 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0017 JAMES HILLEGASS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 JAMES C HILLEGASS 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 24 0012 MARTHA A L SPENCER REV TRUST 1005 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55391 MARTHA SPENCER P O BOX 205 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 8/23/2023 I v French take 4 SIPP I! Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2245 French Lake Rd This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 08/23/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/01/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 10/31/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 18 September 2023 Subject: #LA23-000048, Sharratt Design, 3548 Ivy Place, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot area, lot width, and hardcover variances in conjunction with redevelopment of the property with a new single-family home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on a narrow lakeshore lot. The new home is proposed to meet all of the required setbacks. The lakeside patio and portions of the pergola are recapturing the footprint from the existing home within the average lakeshore setback and are not considered to be new encroachments. Variances for lot width, lot area, and 35.5% hardcover where 44.4% exists and 25% is permitted are requested. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the substandard area and width as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. Additionally, they have provided a narrative and supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, the substandard size (area and width) of the property and its location along the narrow Ivy Place roadway result in challenges to redevelopment. The property currently has 44.4% hardcover. The proposed redevelopment of the property reduces the overall hardcover to 35.5% which results in the property becoming closer to conformance with the 25% limitation. Structural coverage is proposed at 18.6% where a maximum of 20% is permitted. Ivy Place is narrow and does not accommodate any on -street parking. Further, due to the constricted width of the roadway, maneuverability in the neighborhood is also challenging. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1C Required Existing Proposed Street/Rear 30' ±118' house 32' detached garage 61.2' North Side *7.5' 3.7' 8' South Side *7.5' 9.6' 8' Lakeshore 75' 73' 88.5' Average Lakeshore The proposed home will comply with the ALS requirement. *Staff has applied the side setback flexibility to this lot allowing for a 7.5 foot side setback (10% of the lot's width but not less than 7.5 feet) FILE # LA23-000048 18 Sept 2023 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 12,581 s.f. (0.28 acre) 52'@ OHWL 52' @ 75' Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 12,581 s.f. (0.28 acre) Allowed: 2,516 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,192 s.f. (17.4%) Proposed: 2,349 s.f. (18.6%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Overlay District Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Zone Hardcover Tier 3,145 s.f. 5,591 s.f. 4,465 s.f. Tier 1 12,581 s.f. (25 %) (44.4%) (35.5%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Width Variance (Section 78-3 Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, such as the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The request for a hardcover variance results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are also required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area variance is not granted. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) With the redevelopment of the property, the applicant is proposing 35.5% hardcover where 44.4% currently exists. This is a reduction of the overall hardcover by 1,126 square feet, an 8.9% reduction from the existing level. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding FILE # LA23-000048 18 Sept 2023 Page 3 of 4 area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and width make development difficult. The challenges with Ivy Place's narrow width requires guest parking to be accommodated on site resulting in the need for additional hardcover. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances proposed to rebuild a new home on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request for variances supporting construction of a new residence on the substandard lot is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size is an existing condition, there is no available land with which to make the property more conforming. The restricted roadway and substandard lot size are challenges not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variances for the property which is substandard in area and hardcover requirements. The project has been designed with an effort toward limiting the additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a new home in a conforming footprint, which is reasonable. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and parking difficulties also apply to many of the properties in the immediate neighborhood. The proposed hardcover level is an improvement from the existing condition and is not out of character. FILE # LA23-000048 18 Sept 2023 Page 4 of 4 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's substandard area and width, combined with the challenges resulting from the narrow roadway create difficulties which apply to few properties in the City. The immediate neighboring properties have similar challenges. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed size of the home is below the 20% structural coverage limit. Granting of the lot area, lot width, and hardcover variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variances for lot area, lot width, and hardcover in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Without variances the property is unbuildable. The variances for lot area, width, and hardcover are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No comments from the public have been received. The neighbors on either side have signed the acknowledgement form. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances to construct a new home according to the proposed plan. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey & Existing Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List & Acknowledgement Forms Exhibit H. Plat Map 9/14/23,12:56 PM Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 08/23/2023 Address: 3548 Ivy Place Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723420017 Land Use Number: LA23-000048 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: DANIEL GREGOIRE Address: 3160 S BARRINGTON AVE #101 LOS ANGELES CA 90066 Applicant: Name: Nora Kirkwold Company: Sharratt Design & Company Address: 464 Second St. Excelsior, MN 55331 nkirkwold@sharrattdesign.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Demo existing home and detached garage and construct new home and attached garage Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87622175&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 cles C () ril p a 11 August 23, 2023 Additional narrative for variance submission Setback improvements: Average lake shore setback: The existing structure in non -conforming by 16'-6" This proposal fully conforms to the average lake shore setback which betters the existing by 16'-6". Side yard setback: The existing structure is non -conforming, on the North side by 5.5'. This proposal, (on a narrow site) conforms to the side yard setbacks on both sides with 8'-0" setbacks on each side which is greater than the minimum 7'-6" setback. Street side setback: Currently, the existing detached garage is conforming to the 30'-0" front yard setback to the property line. This proposal expands this setback to 60'-10" due to attachment of the garage to the house. Lake setback: Current structure is non -conforming with a 72.9 setback from the lake. This proposal expands this setback to 89'-3". Hardcover improvements: The existing hardcover is at 46.49 %. This proposal results in 35.49 %, or an 11 % reduction of hardcover. In as percentage of what is existing, this proposal drops the existing hardcover by 1384 square feet. The conforming lot area is 20,000 square feet. This lot is 12, 581 square feet or 62.9% of that required. When all the exact requirements for a 20,000 square foot lot are directly applied to a lot 62.9% smaller than required, this in and of itself constitutes very practical difficulties in many requirements. We can not change the area of the lot nor the width of the lot. Variances for lot area and lot width must be allowed to continue. Comments on proposed pergola: We are proposing a lakeside pergola which is supported by brackets which ties into the Craftsman style look the owners are going for. Most all of the pergola members fall within the area of the existing home, however, there would be a bracket and one member on the Southeast side that falls outside the existing footprint. There would not be any columns or obstructions to view because they are 10'-0" off the ground, however, if the City of Orono will not approve this, the plan is to move the entire home back 4'-0" so as to have nothing encroach into the average lakeshore setback. 4 6 4 S e c o n d S t r e e t S u i t e 1 0 0 E x c e l s i o r M N 5 5 3 3 1 p h o n e 9 5 2. 4 7 0 9 7 5 0 f a x: 9 5 2 4 7 0. 8 4 0 7 w e b s i t e s h a r r a t t d e sign . c o m e m a i l: i n f o@ s h a r r a t t d e s i g n. c o m 9/14/23, 12:56 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000048 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: See one and two above and comparative tabulations on sheet A-1. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The requirement for variance is not created by the proposed new land owner. The primary circumstances unique to this property is the application of requirement for a 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size to a property that is only 62.9% the size it is required to be. By definition, practical difficulties to allow reasonable use will abound. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: This much more conforming proposal will alter the locality's character in only a positive way through nearly eliminating all legal non -conformities contained here -in. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations for this project are not practical difficulties other than to build smaller , more efficient, less costly than typical, reasonably sized home. S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Not applicable 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Not applicable 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Not applicable 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Not applicable 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Not applicable 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes.. and necessary for a quality revevelopment of land to significantly make a betterment to the city. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: In no way will the granting of this variance impair any safety or health concerns. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: This is correct. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87622175&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 �uruP�ur� C�Pr�ifirtt�P Site Plan Survey For. • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument ALIGN BUILDING AND REMODELING ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only Property located in Section J � Denotes Existing Contours 20, Township 117, Range 23, �/ Denotes Proposed Contours Hennepin County, Minnesota x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Basis for Denotes Surface Drainage bearings is assumed Property Zoned: LR -1C - One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre Setbacks: Front = 30 feet Side = 10 feet Rear = 75 feet from OHWL 100 Year Flood Elevation = 931.1 per FEMA map 27053Co311 F effective date 11/04/2016 100 Year Flood Elevation per city = 931.5 Re3/dence /Re wood F�nce t e�� / / 0� 95.8 946 944.9 II �bk e „0 /M.?nhol� I I W 39 �1 I II e2 I I \ \ I red U2c \ 93 (0 at ) 019. hh10944.0 / / / tw9 94'7. \\,y // // bw945.3 3e st x / 94L�� tbfw t 947.0 --/ 939.6 l bw944, i 94(9.3 �\ j is 943. / 'R-4! . / -49. / \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ 928.6 \\ \\ \\ 9�3� O N \ 09 s p> \ \ W X \ \ m to 28.6 \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ 936 \ �Da)04R5 Lake Minnetonka ttw93 .3 Exr txxmg II \ Shoreline ebb 32 \all s P• Ordinary High Water 94/.3 9 s �� t r 01- \\ �' \ Elevation = 929.4 ��,sbn9 \J �� 11 ,3 929.4 OHW Contour X l 43.V; Ivo bw9 l.6 G �v'. 208 \ \ 9 h \ 9 g2- ,et 2 - - JG 93.19 �S \\ 93 /.5 c nto,r /loo year flood 1 3t928.7 d942. 93,9.8 \\\m \ w944.6v940.4 bw94 j 06 �t \ 4'4•,� /. T -1 \9 5 I `� 933. l \ w944.7 10 / WO Yi' ¢ \ X \ bw942.s �>, t X \ 94 c -40.5 - 4 ,\4 Pv \ `;' y ° >u'. 'dam l`r "• 6 \\ \\ FQtw943.5 bw936.640 6 im of 6" �O 94.#44.3 \ Drain- 'is X x . \ \1946.3 y4 Drainttn� light ! 9�`I 75�setb-kfnefromOHWL \ 928.7 `V X s X I 946.6 /� \ nosed $ eco \ \ 0 ; rice A � \ robs: y. 45.2 \ Qo1a 7 X \ a ego\9°6 945.8 946.5 Proposed First Floor \ 946.06 Proposed Top of Foundation 9 s .4x 945. o \ � \ 949.0 946.1 Proposed Garage Floor o \ 938.38 Proposed Basement Floor *7w b 3 7 Res/dence Type of Building / e Full Basement Walk i eo�p 94 . PROPOSED HARDCOVER EXISTING HARDCOVER GARAGE 787 HOUSE 1660 HOUSE 1562 GARAGE 532 DRIVE 2552 DRIVE 1433 CONC. STOOP 146 PAVERS 226 DECK 125 STEPS TO LOWER LEVEL 51 PAVERS 205 NEW STEPS 21 STEPS 188 RET. WALLS 151 WOOD WALKWAY 239 FRONT WALK 155 CONC.APRON 44 FRONT STOOP 37 PATIO CREDIT -100 AC 6 FRONT WALK 0 Pergolan Posts 1 EXIST. HARDCOVER 5591/12581=44.44% EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE 2318/12581 = 18.4% 4465 PROPOSED HARDCOVER 4465/ 12581 = 35.49% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 2395/12581 = 19.0% Note: Builder is requesting an additional 35 sq. k. as the site is Developed NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. Legal Description " ' 1 certify that this survey, Ian, or report was prepared b me or under m Project No. 90442 Scale: 1= 30 � y, p p p p y y Lot 174, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF Drawn B direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under F. B. No.1131-70 y 29 the laws of the State of Minnesota SPRING PARK LOTS Prepared this 23th day of August 2023. Hennepin County, Minnesota Address: 3548 Ivy Place Orono, MN DEMARC rev 8- I -2023 site line 8-30-2023 city cc omments LAND SURVEYING 6 ENGINEERING 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Signed Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com G ory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 F:\survey\taylors subdivision of spring park - hennepin\174 taylors sub of spring park\01 Surveying - 90442\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg / I _ � I I I I HOUSE I d GARAGE 532 rr 2552 CONC. STOOP —938--�, DECK 125 PAVERS 205 16 / 940 239 CONC. APRON 44 RET. WALLS 158 FRONT WALK 0 5849 1EXISTING HARDCOVER 115849/12581 = 46.49% EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE wall 943. / I _ � I I I I HOUSE 1660 GARAGE 532 DRIVE 2552 CONC. STOOP 146 DECK 125 PAVERS 205 STEPS 188 WOOD WALKWAY 239 CONC. APRON 44 RET. WALLS 158 FRONT WALK 0 5849 1EXISTING HARDCOVER 115849/12581 = 46.49% EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE 2318/12581 = 18.4% r ; rra �C CZes company imm 464 SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SHEET INDEX PROJ EGT TEAM ARCHITECT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC 454 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / NEW HOME FOR DIBIAS 3548 IVY PLAN ORONO, MN SHEET Al NUMBER THESE DOCUMENT55H4LL �eEaS�a��oR FFDLSTWBUTED WIThbU' E%OFE55EO NR:Tf£N GONSEYt OF S I <9 0/ --------- REMOVE EXIST. RETA: NNIG WALL OPT. RAIN GARDEN i piy I � Veil l •n i Lr / C� / \ / 946 ---_j 944-, -- i loll PERGOLA SHOWN DASHED 94& O / \\ ,i INDICATES SILT FENCE Z) HATCHED AREAS INDICATE EXISTING FOOTPRINT TO BE REMOVED INDICATES PROPOSED CONTOURS ----- INDICATES EXIST. CONTOURS S EXISTING HARDCOVER HOUSE 1660 GARAGE 532 DRIVE 2552 I CONC. STOOP 146 I DECK 125 PAVERS 205 I I STEPS 188 EXISTING WOOD WALKWAY CONC. APRON RET. WALLS 158 FRONT WAL 0 -- WOOD FENCE --- TOP OF WALL 943.5 N 46039'35"E 22 EXIS;. RET. WALL - Lu�- NDSGAPE RETAINING W CID ----- -945 5Ac T / L9lVBHdG" a�5 936.6 GARAGE: 946.25 - 946.43 - - - I , P R O P S E D / M.F. 946.5 L.L. 936.65 / I /946.40 I II II II II II II II II II II II � / 46.4 \ II II II II II II I. C) � L_— T —_—rl---I—I--- I: —T --TT-- — TT— —rI — -- I II II II II II 5849 EXIST. HARDCOVER 5849/ 12581 = 46.49% EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE 2318/12581 = 18.4% I � I - O,A II 1 Site Ty Al 1/8" = 1'-0" I I oe 100, lol - PERGOL48X8" POSTS �-- E X6.2 , , sharra ,Cil esu , , company , I 464 SECONSTREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 , I FAX:952-7ro7-5859 EXCELSIOR; MN 55311 info@sharrattdesign.com SH Is" I N DEX I / \ I Al 51 PLAN / \ / ry�� A2 LO. R LEJEL PLAN \ / \ CY)\ cr! A3 MAIN'FIi-OIL PLAN A4 UPPE E PLAN \ / A6 EXT IOR LLE ATIONS V v J \ EXI I / A7 EX IOR/ELE ATIONS end 7 WALK \ / \ \ / I - RE�16FVE X // // NEW/STO TEP \\ \j RE WAL Dock \I Wood Vya I kway i —I _ ----- --------- '�X /IST. RE // 1 -\ REMOVE EXISIT. PAVERSI I ( I t / WALLS Qush REMOV EXIST. DECD STEPS RET. WALLS PROJECT, �� \ I I �i1 j I p� I I ARGHITEGT H RRATT DE COMPANY, LLG S A DESIGN � GO A 4G04 SEGOND STREET, SUITE 100 / •I I \ \ I I / EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 GONTAGT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) vv C)/ � �M -� 0 �' C) \ STRUCTURAL ENGINEER :21I . PERGOLA \ °' //M rn SHOWN DASHEID WILL NOT EXTEND i \ BEYOND EXIS ING / / C,o \� FOOTPRINT / h� i � GENERAL CONTRACTOR , AVERAGE SETBACK LINE i BETWEEN ADJACENT HOMES II , N , � I i n � PROPOSED HARDCOVER: 46.49% (5849 SQ. FT.) HARDCOVER: 35.49% IMPROVED BY 11% (4465 SQ. FT.) BUILDING COVERAGE: 18.4 BUILDING COVERAGE: 19.0% LESS THAN THE 20 % ALLOWED LAKE SETBACK 72.9' LAKE SETBACK 88'-0" ADDED 15'-3" SIDE SETBACK NW 3.4' SIDE SETBACK NW 8'-0" ADDED 4'-8"TO EXIST. AND EXCEEDS REQ'D. BY 6" SIDE SETBACK SE FRONT SETBACK BUILDING HEIGHT 9.6' 32'-0" 24'-0" (WALK OUT TO PEAK) SIDE SETBACK SE FRONT SETBACK BUILDING HEIGHT 8'-0" EXCEEDS REQ'D. 6" 60'-10" EXCEEDS REQ'D. BY 30'10" 23- 4 1/2" (HIGH GRADE TO AVE. GABLE WELL BELOW 30'-0") INFORMATION FOR SITE PLAN TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY DEMARC LAND SURVEYING & ENG. 7601 73RD AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, 55428 763-560-3093 PROPOSED HARDCOVER ❑ GARAGE 787 ❑ HOUSE 1562 ❑ DRIVE 1433 El PAVERS 261 ❑ STEPS TO LOWER LEVEL 51 ❑ NEW STEPS 21 ❑ RET. WALLS 151 ❑ FRONT WALK 155 ❑ FRONT STOOP 37 ❑ AC 6 \ PERGOLA POSTS 1 PROPOSED HARDCOVER 4465/ 12581 = 35.49% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 2386/ 12581 = 19.0% ISSUED FOR NEW HOME FOR: E3IAS 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I Al I NUMBER F''AI NCJTI�'F:- THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN E COMPANY, LLC. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN e COMPANY, LLC. • • ill EMENEENEENE •s ©ENEEMENEEN EMEMOMMEEME • MrllMEMSEEMEN •: ME11M' ISEEMEMEN war -20,s EEEZZMMMEEE NEW HOME FOR: E3IAS 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I Al I NUMBER F''AI NCJTI�'F:- THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN E COMPANY, LLC. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN e COMPANY, LLC. 0 c� A7 1 11' 1 1 /'T -:�Gt' 7" 1 r) Lis sharra C11eSu • company 464- SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-767-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdeslgnzom SHEET INDEX Al SITE PLAN A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS _ 139 6" N 15-8" 1 16' - 2" 18'-8" \40e ? 90M LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 1 1 CA6 PROJECT TEAM ARGH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC 404 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUGTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. GENERAL GONTRAGTOR T.B.D. ISSUED FOR NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I A2 I NUMBER rIF�GJ_ NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. • • • Manz Eznmam3mzsm NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I A2 I NUMBER rIF�GJ_ NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. I I I I I I -3" AT OVERHEAD DOOR FROM TOP OF MAIN FL SUBFL. o 90' - 2" 46'-6' 1 25-2" 1 14'-0" AA77 01 01 3 A9 � 4 36" RANGE W/ 1 HOOD /\ 3 26-15 26 6 7rok5 263 7 �� A8 A8 / 1 Ag 3/16" / FT. 3/16" / FT. 2 A9 \I �I L TYP. HIGHPOINT OF SLAB @ 4' 3/16" / FT FROM TOP OF MAIN FL. SUBFL. -45/8" MIDPOINT OF GARAGE @ -3" FROM TOP OF MAIN FL. SUBFL. GARAGE WARP FLOOR TO TOP OF 34'-0" X 22'-0° MAIN FL. SUBFL. AT DOOR — - 4 5/8" 5-0" WIDE GONG. WALK 2396 FOOTPRINT 1562 FIN. SQUARE FT. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 34' -0" \ 5 POWDER 6'-9" X 5-2"\ 2636 1 1 1 1 1 2636 1 r 39' - 4" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I AQ `( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WIN - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 39' - 4" 0' 5' 10' 20' ELEV SH. j1 i I 2636 .O.O S. i o 1 MALL APPLIANGEp in C� PANTRY 5-9" X 12-9" 4'-2" 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I l� I F -1 I 2616-2 1 2616- 1 1 30" _ =-- ---art-- PANTRY,' - -- L--------- �------------------ ---- - J - - - - ITCH RAISED GLC. ` -3 1 cn w = SHOWN DASHED 1 1 - 4' - O" 1 J 1 SCREEN PORCH -10 �I O w p 1 _ -h3'-0'X12'-3" _ ----art--J �1 ML 0] -- ------ 1 � --------- - ---------�------------- ---- - - - - - 1 1 I - ------------------------------------ _ 12-0-- )� 8'-0" SLIDER - ---- - I - - C _- 1 - -- - - 1 - 1 -----------+I --- ----------- --��---------- --- - - - - -- DINING ----------!-- -------------- - !---------- Fj 15'-9" X 12'-6" - - ^c _ -- 1- Iz p - LIVING - 18'-0" X 17-2"m- 1 - - -- J C 1 i i BUFFET a - - 3060 6.. 3060 6.. 3060 -L-------------------�i---------- l- 6„ 306 -------- - rt-- - - I I I I -- I 7X 7" BOXEDLl WOOD BEAMS 3016 15-10" 1 19' - 0" 1 I 3060 3016 -40 I I I � IQ 1 I � 'W I ' O 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 N sharra CileSu • company 464 SECOND STREET PH: 952-/470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 95.�=767-5859 EXGELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharfattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al SITE PLAN A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN/ Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR /ELEVATIONS i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i / / / / / 1 / PROJECT TEAM / / ARCHITECT / SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG 404 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXGELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUGTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. G L GONTRAGTOR T.B.D. ISSUED FOR • • • Manz E2EE3M3EEsE lllllmvz�-■EMEEZMEE■■ • ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ NEW HOME FOR: BIAS 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I A3 I NUMBER r�EGAI_ NOTICE. THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SI-IARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. A7 1 I X\ ILE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN sharra CileSu • company 464- SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-767-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdeslgnzom SHEET INDEX Al SITE PLAN A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT TEAM ARGH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC 404 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUGTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. E�I RAL GONTRAGTOR T.B.D. ISSUED FOR NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET A4 NUMBER 0' 5' 10' 20' 2 A7rLF_'"'- NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 .9RAIZRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. • • • Manz Eznmam3mzsm ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET A4 NUMBER 0' 5' 10' 20' 2 A7rLF_'"'- NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 .9RAIZRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. A7 1 0 X\ \C) ROOF 1/4" = 1'-0" Lis -----(8) sharra CileSu • company 464- SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-767-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdeslgnzom SHEET INDEX Al SITE PLAN A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT TEAM ARGH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC 404 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUGTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. GENERAL GONTRAGTOR T.B.D. 2 SUED FOR NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I A5 I NUMBER rIF�GJ_ NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. • • • Manz Eznmam3mzsm • ZZZVZZIHZ -- SOME ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLACE OF -ONO, MN SHEET I A5 I NUMBER rIF�GJ_ NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. UPPEf MAIN F MAIN l QBSMT — — ACK /4" = 1'-0" o00\00, ^ PHALT SHINGLES RDI BOARD SHINGLES :DAR ARBOR MEMBERS DOD BRACKET RDI BOARD LAP SIDING o� Como)� sharra Cl es company 464- SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-767-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdeslgnzom SHEET INDEX Al SITE PLAN A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG 404 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT (952-470-9750) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. GENERAL CONTRACTOR ISSUED FOR NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET A6 NUMBER r�F�GJ_ NOTICE. THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 .9RARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. • • • :lawMIZEEEMIME ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ NEW HOME FOR: 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET A6 NUMBER r�F�GJ_ NOTICE. THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 .9RARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. BSMT PLAT 1/4" = 1'-0" EL IE LEFT 1/4" = 1'-0" SOLATUBES ��V� ■ ■ ■ 066- LEFT 66 ILI sharra 41 es company 404- SECOND STREET PH: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100ROOF F:9S2-767-5859 EXG€harrattdeslgn.com SHEET INDEX JECT TEAM cT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG 4ro4 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 BS/M�T L VEL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 `moi 1 \� (:(�NTAr:T• MIGF �,NA1�I�ATT ��s�-awn-��sn1 6TRUOTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. GENERAL OONTRAOTOR T.B.D. ISSUED FOR Al SITE PLAN ID S I /` -e A2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A4 UPPER LEVEL PLAN • A5 ROOF PLAN Aro EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS UP LEVEL • M ATE JECT TEAM cT SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG 4ro4 SECOND STREET, SUITE 100 BS/M�T L VEL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 `moi 1 \� (:(�NTAr:T• MIGF �,NA1�I�ATT ��s�-awn-��sn1 6TRUOTURAL ENGINEER T.B.D. GENERAL OONTRAOTOR T.B.D. ISSUED FOR 'PER LEVE NEW HOME FOR: MAIN PLAT ID S I /` -e • • • MOVE s ■■■�����■■■ worgrApAmAywAMMENEENEENE ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ 'PER LEVE NEW HOME FOR: MAIN PLAT ID S I /` -e 3548 IVY PLAGE OF -ONO, MN SHEET A7 NUMBER VAIN LEVEL r�F�GJ_ NOTICE. THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLG. © COPYRIGHT 2023 .9RARRATT DESIGN $ COMPANY, LLC. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Addr ;ss: 3548 Ivy Place Prepared by: Demarc Date: 08/30/23 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total Square Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 787 S.F. A Garaae irre ular 787 S.F. B House irre ular 1562 S.F. c Driveway irre ular 1,433 S.F. D Pavers irre ular 261 S.F. E Steps to Lower Level irreaular 51 S.F. F New Steps irre ular 21 S.F. G Ret. walls irre ular 151 S.F. H Front Walk irreaular 155 S.F. A/C irre ular 6 S.F. Per olan Posts rrPmilar 1 S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): 4465 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 4465 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 12581 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 35.49% This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 search by Address or PID search help OO 3548 Ivy Place, Orono Results Property Links 8 X PID 2011723420017 Address 3548 Ivy PI, Orono, MN 55391 Owner Daniel Gregoire Taxpayer DANIEL GREGOIRE 3160 S BARRINGTON AVE #101 LOS ANGELES CA 90066 Parcel Area 0.28 acres Total Tax 12,012 sq ft Torrens/Abstract Abstract Addition Taylors Subd Of Spring Park Lots Lot 174 Block $1,467,700 Metes & Bounds Residential Market Value $1,280,000 Total Tax $12,195.34 Property Type Residential Homestead Homestead Year Built 1910 Market Value $1,467,700 Property Type Residential Homestead Homestead Year Built 1910 Sale Code Warranty Deed Sale Price $1,05000 Sale Date 12/2019 School Dist 277 Sewer Dist Wateshed Dist 3 lie 38 20-117-23 34 0026 38 20-117-23 42 0031 JOEL CARLSON DAVID S OWEN 3026 CASCO POINT RD KAY J OWEN WAYZATA MN 55391 3486 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0005 38 20-117-23 42 0033 CITY OF ORONO JONATHAN P PAUL PO BOX 66 3532 IVY PL CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0006 38 20-117-23 42 0034 HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN 5413 MANITOU RD LAKE MTKA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 42 0016 38 20-117-23 42 0035 WILLIAM S DAMPIER SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW CLAUDIA DAMPIER 3535 IVY PL 3550 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0017 38 20-117-23 42 0036 DANIEL GREGOIRE SCOTT H ANDERSON 3160 S BARRINGTON AVE #101 JULIA L ANDERSON LOS ANGELES CA 90066 3508 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0018 38 20-117-23 42 0038 JEFFREY R LARSON PAUL J TAUNTON HEATHER L MIDJE LARSON 3600 IVY PL 3546 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 CHICAGO IL 60613 38 20-117-23 42 0019 38 20-117-23 42 0040 MICHAEL JOSEPH DREHER RUSSELL KOCON 3534 IVY PL JACQUELINE GIBNEY WAYZATA MN 55391 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0022 38 20-117-23 43 0051 JAMES M & SHERRY D WHITE WILLIAM D GUST 3516 IVY PL 3034 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0027 38 20-117-23 43 0052 JAMES C WHITE KRISTEN & ANDREW RONNINGEN TERA R WHITE 3030 CASCO POINT RD 3560 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0029 38 20-117-23 43 0053 ZEBADIAH STROUT SCOTT J LORIMER MOLLY STROUT KIMBERLY R LORIMER 3525 IVY PL 3729 N MARSHFIELD AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 CHICAGO IL 60613 38 20-117-23 43 0054 LEISEL & MARK PFLEGHAAR 3509 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM of 3 [print name(s)] [prinf address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 7,5 ky-�3 P " also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property owner /tet/Z3 FIVFJGIEY WVV11=1 LQEG If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. iY fFYrYe%ti:PfCfC�YHeP .- _x-cx-icii�i kkR Rf!**%�***kie�kfi'k#+k#'tiYnHYfY Ykfll�.C�YnY�YIeYe:FfIY�]tXYetRY*R�9ef kfY%:!llkflxllflk�k*RRk!'* katk****-k (we) ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] Of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, 1 (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form — January 2023 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM ' 1 (we) �� of. �� O [print na (s)] [punt address] haveewe __ a fans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at f LU also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, 1 (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvgrnentan the proposed neighbor's projector use requires Council approval, Property Qwn�r f Date Property Owner Date 1 (we) ,20 Z�5 If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, l (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 90 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacerd Property Owner Form — January 2023 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 8/23/2023 3638 3600 { 2914 3600 2910 292[ 5609 3990 r17a 3546 LIED 3334 3545 1 3532 13� V6 3560 2996 3535 tan 353', 348E an irl. 3G3� 3509 3271 {S11 496 "3r 3251 303A to 327 l Orono 3207 3277 3100 5 3245 oG 3247 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3548 Ivy Place This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 08/23/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/07/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 11/06/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 18 September 2023 Subject: #LA23-000049, Stonewood o/b/o Michael Gorman, 3001 Casco Point Road, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (After -the -Fact) Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an after -the -fact average lakeshore setback variance for a roofed porch. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background 3001 Casco Point Road and 3005 Casco Point Road (CPR) are being redeveloped by the same builder, Stonewood. It was their plan to build both new homes nearly simultaneously. Prior to construction, the applicant completed an action to combine the then existing three lots into two (which is the current configuration). In 2022 via Resolution No. 7284 (Exhibit F), the City granted variances for the placement of the neighboring home at 3005 CPR lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback would have been based on the setback of the home to the south at 3015 CPR (because 3001 CPR would be vacant at the time of construction). Applying the setback of 3015 CPR to 3005 would have resulted in moving the proposed home on 3005 CPR to a location that would have appeared to be out of character with the neighborhood. The variance could have been avoided if the applicant had relied on the timing of construction to achieve the same result. The applicant is currently building the new homes on both properties. Their intent was to submit for the permit to build 3001 CPR first to situate the home in the current placement, which would have been permitted. However, due to a submittal timing error for the permits for the two properties, as well as an inconsistency between the construction plans and the survey, a roofed, lake side porch was constructed lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. A non -roofed patio would be permitted in the current location. To address the setback encroachment, the applicant is requesting after -the -fact approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for the roofed porch on the lake side of the home at 3001 CPR. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the timing of permit submittal construction and an administrative error as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. FILE #LA23-000049 18 Sept 2023 Page 2 of 5 Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, the application submittal timing appears to be the primary issue. The applicants' plans were not coordinated and the roofed portion of the lakeside porch was not depicted correctly on the survey. Staff finds the porch location to be consistent with the Code, had the permits been submitted in the applicants' preferred order. The neighboring property owners on each side have submitted their support for the current encroachment. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-1279 - Setbacks: LR -1C Required Existing / As Constructed Rear 30' 46.9' North Side 10' 36.3' South Side 10' 15' Lakeshore 75' 136.5' Average Lakeshore The roofed porch is 136.5 feet from the lake; 4 feet lakeward of the ALS line. Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The properties at 3001 and 3005 CPR were intended to be constructed concurrently which resulted in a timing -of -construction -driven average lakeshore setback determination. 3005 CPR received an average lakeshore setback variance in order to solidify the placement of the home in a similar location as the previously existing home on that property. The homes on both of the properties were removed prior to construction of the new homes on either lot; both lots were vacant. City Code 78-1279 provides guidance for determining the average lakeshore setback when a line cannot be drawn from the neighboring homes such as lots without a neighbor, or adjacent to a street, etc. (see Exhibit H). Staff believes it was the applicant's intent, after receiving the ALS variance for 3005 CPR, to submit for the permit for the 3001 CPR lot first. This timing would have allowed placement of the 3001 CPR home at the setback of the Goodwin home (2975 CPR). Because of the application submittal timing mix-up, the required setback at the time of the home construction at 3001 CPR was determined by a projected line from 3005 CPR to the Goodwin home on the north at 2975 CPR. The Goodwin home is ±138 feet from the lake, measured perpendicular to the OHWL. The average lakeshore setback line was not depicted on the survey; however, staff extrapolated the average lakeshore setback line from the home location on the survey for 3005 CPR for the permit issuance. This line is drawn in RED on Exhibit C. The roofed lakeside porch was not specifically identified on the building permit survey, rather it was depicted as a patio (no roof). The home met the setback represented by the red ALS line. The most lakeward extent of 3001 CPR (roofed porch) is situated approximately 136 feet from the lake at its closest point resulting in an approximate 4 -foot encroachment within the average lakeshore setback. FILE #LA23-000049 18 Sept 2023 Page 3 of 5 Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The property includes difficulties in the depth and orientation of the shoreline. The requested average lakeshore setback variance will not result in blocking views of the lake for the neighboring properties. The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The home is situated approximately 136 feet from the lake and will not disrupt lake views from neighboring homes; the proposed variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the roofed porch the proposed location partially within the average lakeshore setback does not appear to be unreasonable considering the lake views from neighboring homes are not impacted. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The intent of the property owner was to submit a conforming plan. The application errors were not intentional; however, accuracy of submitted permit information is the applicant's responsibility; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is FILE #LA23-000049 18 Sept 2023 Page 4 of 5 located. This condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The depth of the lots, shape of the shoreline, and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties. The majority of the home is completed and removing the encroachment is not a simple endeavor as the porch roof structure is integral to the structure of the overall roof and cannot be simply removed. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's shoreline orientation, depth of the lots, and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Removal of the encroachment will result in a significant impact to the property owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Removing the encroachment will result in significant impacts to the existing home likely requiring a significant structural redesign, according to the builder; therefore, the requested variance is necessary and would not serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Public comments have been received in support of the variance. See Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the after -the -fact variance. FILE #LA23-000049 18 Sept 2023 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Annotated Building Permit Survey Exhibit D. Updated Survey Exhibit E. Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Resolution No. 7284 Exhibit G. Public Comment Exhibit H. City Code 78-1279 Exhibit 1. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map 8/29/23, 9:36 AM Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary 08/23/2023 3001 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 LA23-000049 Agent on behalf of property owner Name: Address: Name: Sven Gustafson Applicant: Company: Stonewood Address: 153 Lake St. E Wayzata, MN 55391 sven@stonewood.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Sven Gustafson sven@stonewood.com Associated Contact: Michael Gorman michael@splitrock.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: After the fact Variance for Lake Side Setback Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizen serve. com/Admin/PermitControIIer?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87611037&ciDisplapnull&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 3001 Casco After the fact Variance Request This after -the -fact variance request is consistent with the general intent of the average lakeshore setback ordinance. The plans and survey for the property at 3001 were approved and permitted by the city of Orono before construction began. The home is being constructed according to the approved plan and location. Background: Adjacent Homes and Setback Consideration During construction, the foundation as -built survey was also approved by the city as conforming to permit documents. When simultaneously designing the two neighboring homes, the surveyor and architect based the location of the subject home on an average lakeshore setback that results from the property to the north, 2975 and the vacant property to the south, 3005. Note: A variance was approved for the lakeside setback for the home on 3005. Survey issues: The city approved survey mistakenly labeled the covered portion of the lakeside patio as "Patio" rather than "Covered Patio." The Covered patio is flanked by two uncovered patios, which were all shown as a single element on the survey. Surveys for both the subject and neighboring properties did not include the average lakeshore setback line, making it unclear to city staff that the patio was bisected by the setback. While a requirement, the city overlooked that this was not shown on the two surveys. The surveyor believed that, because of the average lakeshore setback variance that had been issued on one of the properties (3005), that it would be misleading to show this average setback line on the survey. He applied this logic to both properties. While the survey may have lacked information, the approved building plans that were submitted with the survey clearly show the patio as a covered patio (labeled as such and drawn in detail on the 3 relevant elevations, the floor plans, the foundation plan, and the roof plan. Timeline: Permit Application and Delays Plans for the home at 3001 were ready for permit before those for 3005. An application was created on our company's CitizenServe account for 3001 expecting that this established the application date. Delays in engineering, discussion about drainage with the city engineer and design modifications led to a postponement in finalizing the submission. The plans for 3005 were submitted days before the final application for 3001 on a different account followed by the application for 3001 weeks later. The initial application went unused. Conclusion: Impact of Timing and Miscommunication Had the permit application for 3001 been dated just minutes earlier, this variance wouldn't be required, and the location of the home on 3001 would be considered conforming. If city staff had recognized the nonconformity, permits could have been withdrawn and resubmitted in the correct order. Miscommunication, engineering delays, and transfer of the application resulted in the permit for the subject property being submitted after the neighboring property. 8/29/23, 9:37 AM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000049 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Yes. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The home conforms with the average lakeshore setback as determined by the home to the right. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations are not alone a factor in this request. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The project is conforming if it were permitted just moments before the neighboring home. Due to an administrative error, the permits were submitted in the incorrect order and as a result, the average lakeshore setback is being determined differently than had been anticipated. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This variance should be allowed under this chapter. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This is not applicable to our request. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The request is specific to this project as two homes were being designed and construction in conjunction with one another and the order in which the permits needed to be issued is driving the measurements that necessitate the request. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87611037&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 8/29/23, 9:37 AM Permit List I Citizenserve 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Correct. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located.: 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Without the granting of this variance the home is considered non -conforming. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting of the variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.: 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes. The granting of this variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty as described in the narrative. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87611037&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 22-209A File #: 22-001790 Permit #: RPS22-000183 Address: 3001 Casco Point RD Orono MN 55391 Description: New Construction Single Family Structure Document: Stonewood 3001 (2987) Casco Pt Rd 1-3-23.pdf 1.1 G. Comment, Adam Edwards • Comment: Drainage: Special care will need to be exercised in creating the drainage pattern on the sides of the property to ensure that runoff is not directed onto the neighboring properties. • Comment: SWPPP - Stockpile: Any soil or dirt storage piles containing more than ten cubic yards of material should not be located within 25-teet from a roadway or drainage channel. If remaining for more than 14 days, they shall be stabilized by mulching vegetative cover, tarps or other means and enclosed with down gradient perimeter sediment controls. Piles which will be in existence for less than 14 days shall be enclosed with perimeter sediment controls. • Comment: SWPPP: The site must have a construction entrance (per city standard detail) that must be provided and maintained. • Comment: SWPPP - Sediment/Erosion Control: Perimeter sediment control measures should be installed by the contractor and inspected by the City prior to any work, including demolition. The contractor must provide a minimum 24-hour notice prior to inspection. • Comment: SWPPP - Street Cleaning: Streets shall be cleaned and swept within 24 -hours whenever tracking of sediments or soils occurs and before the site is left idle for weekends and holidays. • Comment: Adjacent roadway, curbing and drainage structures must be protected. • Comment: City Utilities: A separate utility permit will be required for the sewer and water connections. • Comment: Please coordinate with Orono Public Works prior to excavating with in the right of way. Conatac DJ Goman 952-249-4661 2.2 line, Melanie Curtis • Comment: Separate permit required for the boathouse. LAKE (948.1) �U n CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BEEHIVE CATCH BASINSTONEWOOD, LLC (942.3) IN LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, HARTZELL ADDITION o BLACKTOP LACHENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA KTOP �� w ROADWAY DRIVEWAY - , :,f. , :\ ' s ' \ PATIO - .-'ti^ (948. \ (952.5) \\ \_- 949.5) e PROPOSED \ 952.3 DRIVEWAY 31 ip \ \ \ \ `i9 \ y 94Q \ (945.8) ( Lo 1O 933.3 W \ \ R \ \...... WALK' 000 O�OQ�RS (G) COVERED C? ENTRY o / / (j) ( / O 530 \•yam \ `oi I I t 1 \ .•• / \ toy j / / �� s / s \ NORTH \a \ o �, PATIO PROPOSED (C) / HOUSE g)� 938 \ \ \ STACKE6\STONE WALL, g46 30Q 1 / >� \ \0 REMOVED `` / �XISTING WALK. BEING_REMOVED"" ...".- -� ��4> Ao CASCO PT RD / LAKE (A)/ a'• /` � PORCH / 18g > I EXISYING STEPS 8 LANDING TO EXISTING REMOVED, AND REP!, S€ �v..... OA HOUSE �\ \ \ (C) X \� > BE (943.8)\ TO \ \ I / �A �REMBDELED �� V / I V 1a \ (H) I I XISTING CONRETE \ \� ,SETBACK \ A WALK, TO REMAIN\ V LINE\ \ ( O SO1TH zg° do / ( \ VO C)\l A V A \\ \ \\ \ \\ +\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ 00 LINEVEY \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6 \ \ \ 929.4 CONTOUR \ N \ o \ \ \ \ I LINE (O.H.W.)\ ulW W (935.1) \ ry MINNETONKA � \0) (947.9)--� SPRING PARK BAY \ \ �\ i ` o�,, \ \ I i i o°` 1 (951.7) (0 ,\ \\ I 1 q 10 ------------- \ o� PUMP l w HOUSE 8.3 V % 1Q01 \`0 0 23-0448 BLACKTOP--' / .-*'-ROADWAY / POWER J e00000"_ ------954— _------ //lye / EXISTING / WATER TOWER / / C� (954.3) l 10 +s 0 20 40 :• S C A L E I N F E E T PROPOSED ELEVATIONS—: (per architect, verify) 1) Garage = 953.0 2) Main level subfloor 3) Top of foundation 4) Lower level slab =942.9 PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2, Block 1, HARTZELL ADDITION which lies northerly of the following described line and it` s extensions: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly 34.03 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 2 being a curve having a radius of 725.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees 43 minutes West tangent to last described curve and along said northeasterly line of Lot 2 a distance of 2.50 feet to the point of beginning of said Fine; thence South 64 degrees 04 minutes 01 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and said line there ending. o denotes iron marker denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum 910.8 denotes proposed spot elevation --917---: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum 930 denotes proposed contour line Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, spot elevations and topography, and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. N m N M �d �N z* o N 0 00 N (D W� Ln QD'° °' Z In z i; � •� : �4In N o 0 vVI"'r"�11 A z ao F-iz i n 0 0) a L E p U i Q z U N 73 z _ V) co U p � � I C �� N A o In U co 3 rn J � a O J U N U 0 U) 1 :3 Q) W = 'z W O J r1r� 0 0 -41 W In �E'p0 t--� 41 ^' ry 41 D-0 :• S C A L E I N F E E T PROPOSED ELEVATIONS—: (per architect, verify) 1) Garage = 953.0 2) Main level subfloor 3) Top of foundation 4) Lower level slab =942.9 PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2, Block 1, HARTZELL ADDITION which lies northerly of the following described line and it` s extensions: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly 34.03 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 2 being a curve having a radius of 725.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees 43 minutes West tangent to last described curve and along said northeasterly line of Lot 2 a distance of 2.50 feet to the point of beginning of said Fine; thence South 64 degrees 04 minutes 01 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and said line there ending. o denotes iron marker denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum 910.8 denotes proposed spot elevation --917---: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum 930 denotes proposed contour line Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, spot elevations and topography, and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. N m N M �d �N z* o N 0 00 N (D Ln QD'° °' i; � •� : N o 0 ao i n 0 0) E p U i z U N 73 _ V) co U p C �� U co J � U N U 0 U) 1 :3 Q) o co a) O J C -41 �E'p0 41 41 D-0 N 4-, p E 0 U O v a—� 0-41 � 0o Vi 0 CO -1-O O 3 U _ 3, 0_2 Mi w w Enw M p-, O 0 F p p z N W E5 a W Q a =) 4 W N of of W N N N N n i I � M N M OD lo— T— I'll 1. 11 V, II/P .1V 1'— .1 o. eos MOA. -W DWI /O�TIR 1, 1 o ik 160m.-, Wul oll, owlT1i� U 1". 9.1 , Z � Y12, I W�" T I W.Affll =MX WT 0 1 W 70 —URAT' Cl�All�l,=— 'T DID I=usLvr.us/ss. uu —D 11. GM—RlAlN0T=N—R R.—RINIR—T— T� —DOW AND — V11W 11R -RIN —OW D� . waW.% IDI �l ==D. 1111 INE M i--� See Engineering E =—Sl<uc:H=- 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Wd D—ph. MN 55391 Copyright 2022 ,,NNOOD C�, 612-A6 -AOOO 153 E.,t L.k. Street Wayzata, MN 55391 V ATERTOWE P LACE RESIDENCE 2987 CASCO POINT ROAD ORONO,MNI PERMIT SET 13 DECEMBER 2022 SHEET ��;, _ ;,; g� _ - �� __ � ,, =- `=� �; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7284 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA22-000041 WHEREAS, on July 20, 2022, Peter Eskuche with Eskuche Design (hereinafter the "Applicant") who represents Watertower LLC (hereinafter the "Owner"), applied for a variance on the property owners' behalf from the City Code for the property addressed 3005 Casco Point Road and legally described as: Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2, Block 1, HARTZELL ADDITION which lies southerly of the following described line and it's extensions: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly 34.03 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 2 being a curve having a radius of 725.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees 43 minutes West tangent to last described curve and along said northeasterly line of Lot 2 a distance of 2.50 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence South 64 degrees 04 minutes 01 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new home 173 feet from the OHWL where the applied average lakeshore setback is 210 feet; and WHEREAS, on August 18, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on August 18, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the variance; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2022, after reviewing the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, Council identified practical difficulties which support granting of the requested variance and directed preparation of findings for approval of the variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 728 4 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA22-000041. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is subject to a concurrent boundary line adjustment request to combine the Property with the southern portion of the property at 2987 Casco Point Road, thereby enlarging it. 3. The Property is located in the LR -1C Zoning District. 4. The Property contains 53,432 square feet (1.2 acres) in area and has a defined lot width of 132.8 feet at the OHWL and 144 feet at the 75 -foot setback. 5. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 6. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance 7. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The lot includes difficulties in the orientation of the shoreline and location of adjacent lots/homes. The proposed home location allows for greater stormwater management opportunities on the street side of the Property. The proposed home footprint and mass will allow for preservation of the lake views of the property to the south. The location of the home will limit the lakeward building extent on the property to the north, which will help to improve lake views currently enjoyed by the owners of 2975 Casco Point Road. The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7 28 4 2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The average lakeshore setback variance will continue to preserve lake views from adjacent homes; the proposed variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to allow construction of the home in the proposed location partially within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable as the proposed home location will preserve lake views from adjacent properties as well as allow for better stormwater management on the street side of the Property benefitting the neighborhood. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The location of the neighboring homes, the curve of the shoreline, and orientation of neighboring properties are out of the owners' control. However, the project has been designed so that the home does not impact views of the lake from adjacent homes; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The proposed home has been designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the Applicant's information. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as residential home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 7 NO. J 2 8 4 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The shape of the shoreline as well as the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for the Owners in redeveloping the Property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The Property's shoreline orientation, and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the owners. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The Applicant has proposed a home which has been designed to be sensitive to the existing views of the lake for the property to the south. The proposed location will offer a greater opportunity for stormwater management on the street side of home. The Applicant states that granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the Owner. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The Property's shoreline orientation, and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the owners. The proposed home location partially within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable as the proposed home location will preserve lake views from adjacent properties as well as allow for better stormwater management on the street side of the Property benefitting the neighborhood. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new home 173 feet from the OHWL where the applied average lakeshore setback is 210 feet; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL NO. 7 28 4 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey by Gronberg and Associates dated 07/18/2022 and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (September 26, 2023). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 26th, day of September 2022. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: l dna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor .esol. No. 7284 xhibit A LA22-000049 --�-. - , f r, X10 z o 1-3 om Mlf- e N. �3g '"► =' o Pm 00-7 -3 �3F 9 R u. $R s. 'o goo �o �$� �'\ � "4• z 0 Vie. .O. C+] w ^C alo o > t7 a;4 % R a.b^�g ei 4 5 - CL �\ 1 iR" a°a A 3m�oR P y T .-I n1NY 1 �•� m`s=1 PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. as trwt I apn n yry Ykm.aa Mme 5rveye vdr me )—Ittt CIYIL 6NGINLLR9. WND WRYLYOR9, LAND PLANNERS Sfale of 1•-=ry N6 NORTH WLLOW p11E, W 55356 ,._,. a �._�_ ,�__•_ _ _ .. _.— .�... « ... 957-473--41— Now IN k ' �. o O \\ \\ \\ \`o O \4 4 t \\\\\f o o� --�-. - , f r, X10 z o 1-3 om Mlf- e N. �3g '"► =' o Pm 00-7 -3 �3F 9 R u. $R s. 'o goo �o �$� �'\ � "4• z 0 Vie. .O. C+] w ^C alo o > t7 a;4 % R a.b^�g ei 4 5 - CL �\ 1 iR" a°a A 3m�oR P y T .-I n1NY 1 �•� m`s=1 PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. as trwt I apn n yry Ykm.aa Mme 5rveye vdr me )—Ittt CIYIL 6NGINLLR9. WND WRYLYOR9, LAND PLANNERS Sfale of 1•-=ry N6 NORTH WLLOW p11E, W 55356 ,._,. a �._�_ ,�__•_ _ _ .. _.— .�... « ... 957-473--41— Fl -j rn mm 30 � m1 pgP a y?1 E 'm ° n o a _ rn O �N DNm �, � > F ° n o a _ rn >K � o� r r� m m _ a O i= _ o? A _ T y Z O4 7v oa �o rn From: Neil Goodwin To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Gustafson, Sven; Michael Gorman; Barbara Goodwin Subject: 3001 Casco Pt Rd Variance, LA23-00049 Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 8:30:06 PM Melanie, After consideration we offer our support of variance LA -00049 to allow the existing structure at 3001 Casco Pt Rd (Gorman house) to extend approximately 8' beyond the setback line towards the lake. Sincerely, Neil & Barbara Goodwin 612-801-6303 From: Michael Gorman To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Fwd: Gorman Variance Request Date: Thursday, September 14, 2023 8:32:43 AM Heim letter of support >>> On Sep 13, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Chris Heim <chris@2ndwavesoftware.com> wrote: »> » >> I am fully in support of the Gorman Variance Request regarding average lakeshore setback. This is very consistent with the neighborhood. » >> Chris and Kim Heim >> 3005 Casco Point Road >>(612)965-1901 Sec. 78-1279. Placement of buildings and structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, buildings, structures, and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Buildings and structures shall be located as follows: (1) Building, structure, and on-site sewerage system setbacks (in feet) from ordinary high water level: Public Water Classification Building/Structure Unsewered Setbacks Sewered Sewage Treatment System NE 150 150 150 RD 100 75 75 GD 75 75 75 Tributary 100 75 75 (2) Additional building and structure setbacks. The following additional setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body: Setback from: Setback (in feet) Top of bluff 30 Unplatted cemetery 50 Right-of-way line of federal, state or county highway and local public and private roads 30* * Except for accessory buildings on lakeshore lots as regulated in this chapter and except for buildings and structures subject to less restrictive side yard adjacent to street setbacks as regulated in the various zoning districts. (3) Bluff impact zones. Buildings, structures and accessory facilities, except stairways, landings and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (4) Uses without water -oriented needs. Uses without water -oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the Shore Setback zone. Portions of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings per section 78-1282. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the Shore Setback zone. (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) than the average distance from the shoreline of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots; This does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, and/or stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Created: 2023-02-03 16:30:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 20) Page 1 of 2 In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the principal building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. In situations where the average lake shore setback line bisects the principal building located on either adjacent lot, the next most adjacent lake side point of the bisected principal building shall be used for determining the average lakeshore setback. If the line continues to bisect the principal building, the next most lakeside point is to be used until the setback line does not bisect the principal building on an adjacent lot. (Ord. No. 101 2nd series, § 1(10.56(16)(C)), 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 11 3rd series, § 1, 5-24-2004; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 28, 6-10-2013; Ord. No. 157 3rd series, § 1, 8-10-2015; Ord. No. 222 3rd series, § 19, 12-10-2018; Ord. No. 234 3rd series, § 1, 10-14-2019; Ord. No. 243 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2020) (Supp. No. 20) Page 2 of 2 Created: 2023-02-03 16:30:23 [EST] Date Application Received: 08/24/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/01/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 10/31/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: September 18, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000052, Revis Stephenson, 3760 Watertown Road Variance for Accessory Structure Location- Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a new accessory building streetward of the principal building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to construct a new accessory building that will be 2,800 square feet in size and used as a barn. The subject property is located at the corner of Watertown Road and Stubbs Bay Road. The City Code designates the front property line on a corner lot to be the shorter dimension of the two. The property's frontage along Watertown Road is approximately 1,552 feet and the frontage along Stubbs Bay Road is approximately 1,459 feet, thus making Stubbs Bay Road the front. The subject property is over 29 acres in size, with a large portion of the property protected with a conservation easement. The proposed home and accessory building are situated in the northwestern corner of the lot. The proposed buildings are over 800 feet from the front property line. However, the applicant has designed the property so that the proposed accessory building is placed streetward of the home. The City Code does not permit oversized accessory buildings (over 1,000 square feet in size) streetward of the principal building. Therefore, a variance is being requested for the proposed placement of the new accessory building as it relates to the principal building's location. All other zoning requirements such as setbacks and lot coverage have been met. This property is exempt to hardcover restrictions. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the conservation easement that has been placed on the property by the Minnesota Land Trust as a practical difficulty that limits the placement of structures and buildings. The conservation easement has reduced the buildable area on the lot to a 1.6 acre building envelope where the proposed new home and barn are to be located. The conservation easement is in place to preserve the natural environment of the lot and agriculture use. The applicant has also indicated that the placement of the new accessory building is to be adjacent to the horse pasture and farm fields as the accessory building will be used as a barn. Additionally, the applicant has stated that the proposed improvements will not impact neighboring properties due to the distance from the property lines. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The proposed home and accessory building are well beyond the required setbacks and not visible from the right-of-way. Staff acknowledges the limitations of the conservation easement and understand the rationale that requires the placement of the barn to be near the agricultural land on the property. FILE #LA23-000052 September 18, 2023 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 —Accessory Building Setbacks: RR -1A District Accessory Building > 1,000 s.f. Required Proposed Front/Street 100' 850' Rear 100' 350' North Side 50' 138' South Side 100' 515' *Accessory buildings may not be located streetward of the principal building. Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: RR -1A District Lot Area Lot Width Required 217,800 s.f. (5.0 acres) 300' Actual 1,297,369 s.f. (29.65 1,458' acres) Section 78-1434 — Accessory Building Size Restrictions: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 1,297,369 s.f. (29.65 acres) Allowed: 17,424.6 s.f. (1.3% of total lot area) Proposed: 2,800 s.f. (0.02%) Applicable Regulations: Accessory Building Placement Variance (Section 78-1440) The City Code limits the placement of oversized accessory buildings to behind the principal building or home. The rural districts within the City (RR -1A, RR -113) allow construction of accessory building streetward of the home if they have less than a 1,000 square foot footprint. The proposed accessory building has a footprint of 2,800 square feet and therefore requires a variance in order to be constructed streetward of the principal building. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variance for FILE #LA23-000052 September 18, 2023 Page 3 of 4 the construction of a new accessory building is supported by practical difficulties. The lot is limited by a conservation easement that does not allow for construction on most of the 29 -acre parcel. The proposed accessory building will be used as a barn that serves the horse pastures and farmland that currently exist of the property. Furthermore, the accessory building is setback far enough from the street that it will have little to no impact on neighboring properties. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance resulting in the construction of a new accessory building in a residential zone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; Constructing a new accessory building to be used as a barn is a reasonable use of the property. The property as it exists today is used as farmland and horse pastures. The placement of the barn on the property serves this accessory use. This criterion is met. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The total size of the property as well as the agricultural use and conservation easement are unique to the property were not created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance will allow the construction of a new barn streetward of the principal building. The proposed location meets all required setbacks and is sufficiently screened from neighboring properties and the street. The proposed placement of the barn will not alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the RR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The size and use of the lot are unique and specific to this property. This criterion is met. FILE #LA23-000052 September 18, 2023 Page 4 of 4 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property is unique in size and nature to that of the surrounding area. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed barn must be adjacent to the existing agricultural land and is further limited by the conservation easement placed on the property. The variance is required for the construction of the barn. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variance allows for the construction of a new accessory building to be used as a barn on a 29 -acre parcel and will not serve as a convenience to the applicant. The placement of the barn on the property is limited and requires a variance. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No public comments have been received. The applicant should be asked if neighboring proeprties were contacted as part of this request. Issues for Consideration Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? Does the Planning Commission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff is supportive of the variance application for the placement of a new accessory building streetward of the principal building as applied. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Survey Exhibit E. Plans Exhibit F. Mailing List & Map 9/1/23, 10:57 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 08/24/2023 Address: 3760 Watertown Road Orono, MN 55359 Parcel Number: 3211823310005 Land Use Number: LA23-000052 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: REVIS L STEPHENSON III Address: 1850 FOXRIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Name: Revis Stephenson Applicant: Company: Address: 3780 Watertown Rd Orono, MN 55359 rstephenson@stonearchcom.com Contact Information: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Build new barn Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12224380&WorkOrder_ID=876... 1 /1 9/1/23, 10:57 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000052 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property will be used as a residence and working farm. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes there are unique circumstances. The property has been subject to a Conservation Easement since 1994, prior to the current landowner's purchase in 2012. The property is 30 acres, but the Conservation Easement has a building envelope that restricts the new house and barn into a 1.3 acre area in the north westerly corner. The Conservation Easement also restricts the aggregate footprint of all buildings on the property. The barn was designed as a two story "drive out basement" type structure in order to have enough space for horses, hay storage, and equipment to operate and maintain a working farm. The "drive out basement" requires a gentle sloped grade to have access to both floors. There is only one reasonable area in the building envelope that affords for the proper slope and access to the agricultural portion of the property. That location happens to be the easterly area of the building envelope. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. In fact the working farm next door at 3850 Watertown Rd has its accessory structures streetward of the primary residence. That farm looks great and I would have never imagined that layout would be a non -conforming Orono's ordinance. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: We do plan to add solar panels to the barn. The requested variance location of the barn allows the best direct sunlight for solar power. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12224380&WorkOrder_ID=876... 1/2 9/1/23, 10:57 AM Response: N/A Permit Details I Citizenserve 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Yes, this is correct. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Yes, this is correct. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The property owner is building a working farm operation and the variance is necessary to do this effectively. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Yes, this is correct. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes, this is correct https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_I D=12224380&WorkOrder_I D=876... 2/2 Variance Request 3760 Watertown Rd. Orono, MN LA23-000052 Reason for variance request: Land owner requests to build an accessory structure greater than 1,000 sqf footprint "streetward" of the primary residence. This is contrary to Orono standard zoning practices. Background: The parcel is located in the NW quadrant on the corner of Watertown Rd and Stubbs Rd. The parcel consists of 30 Acres with approximately 7acres of forest, 19 acres of pasture and tillable farm land, 2.5acres buildable areas, and 2.5 acres of lawn, driveway, etc. The property has been subject to a Conservation Easement since 1994 of which the City of Orono has been provided the current version thereof. The current owner is Revis Stephenson III, who purchased the property in 2012. The property is an active farm, is designated agricultural by the governing assessor, the owners have filed a Form Schedule F with the IRS since 2014, and participate in the annual Department of Agriculture survey to report their farming activities. Figure 1— Google Earth View of 3760 Watertown Rd The Property Owner has submitted a permit to build a new home (RPS 23-000099) and a new Barn Accessory Structure (RAS 23-000047). During the preliminary review of the Barn Permit, the City of Orono determined that Stubbs Bay Rd is considered the "Front of the Parcel" per zoning rules. The property border along Stubbs Bay rd is about 1,465 ft and the about 1555 ft along Watertown Rd. As it turns out, the rule is the shorter of the two is the front. One could imagine why this is the rule for smaller lots, but I truly believe the rule is not intended to prohibit the proposed buildings at this site, on a farm of this size. It would certainly appear that the variance request is in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. Orono history is rooted in agriculture and this property is designed to hold true to the small farm spirit. Practical Difficulties—There are a combination of practical difficulties that make the proposed barn location necessary. 1. The Conservation Easement with the MN Land Trust —The property has been subject to a Conservation Easement since 1994. The key restrictions are a very limited 1.6 acre build envelope that the proposed house and barn are allowed to be built into. Setbacks, driveway access, and trying to save a mature stand of trees in the NW corner further pushes the buildings south and east. 5263 10531 0 Z J� fix___ rv0l0ZU UU �i� 0.5l 045. wfi.4 9r.. �� uM a 5� �MM ELM 8' / eQ50 2 -L Ss 6 �w yo n 10ss M.a e °Px 6 o 22 P1a __ z°.�i o u• Pie' 0� � 'SPR zx os � �� aa5i.4 Lsi050.9 ��.� �� `� � �� �A � �O V A � V � � R 12 i 22' -�)�� N `iasz.�� o� o io 'F �. N° . iosa� f � tefJ'/.ms�a � V iace.o i ,osis � A V 0sJ6 'aexie� .% o 1 tiP�ernas � 1 �� 11 I 0620 �' Yii ; ¢ll 2g NEW x105Z 2 6 ` R ExisTwc wEIL 10 � QpcA' o L=` a ! elnwlu � • i0 e _ // _ 00 3 PRS �0 hs Ir )d0 -. S \ ds.e `*�_ayCrTCITANK§ 1 � / X{l05 O) g � CiF io55o I 1 1 1 PROPOSED BARN gi I 1 1 1 6sL g.22iI].] 19525' >IA 3 �a @'E=Id120 ' A I I�iIC aae h� / ' �e I• iavo H l s�y1 352 ��� 6 s�� .ems �� 1 /, �T " 5 — 141Y10a4y. W '6 0 �ipygg�v`��o z • 050 9.BL x pn45C� �L� / i �' y i044A 16 ala. \ �4 x —d J N \ -104 04HPIN 8 / ,096 017.s. I s / i 76 1to _ — � l i =0463�N4 y1c969 \® // i � l / _ / slEa�'/ .��--i— xi 9il i / � .iM�S o - 109)A '� Ol].9 104] / � w)a IK 1 - � � � i _ � � � av,e i o^10 � -< - - Figure 2 — Site Plan, Building Envelope, Elevations 2. Physical limitations of the site - The horse pasture and farm fields are all east and south of the building envelope. It would not be practical to have the barn located opposite of the agricultural area of the property. The barn is designed as a "drive out basement" style barn in order to accommodate enough space for farming equipment to be stored on the 1St and 2nd levels. A structure with a larger footprint would be a more economical solution, but this is limited by the Conservation Easement. This in turn requires a gentle slope as shown in Figure 3. The existing and proposed elevation contours can be seen in Figure 2. The western 2/3 of M Figure 3 — Barn Elevation the building envelope are relatively flat and not suitable for a walkout structure 3. Additional Circumstances — The address has always been Watertown Rd., the driveway is on Watertown Rd., and the property presents itself as the front of it is on Watertown Road. I have spoken with both adjacent neighbors and neither have an objection to the project. The entire property is not visible from Watertown Rd as there is a heavy tree line on the boundary. The barn would be over 850 feet back from Stubbs Bay Rd. See pictures along Stubbs bay Rd. below. Stubbs Bay Rd. Looking South Stubbs Bay Rd Looking North See the yellow star on Figure 1 for photo locations 4. Solar Panels The owner has plans to put solar panels on the entire roof of the barn. Any other location within the building envelope would have partial shade on portions of the barn during certain times of the day & year. Summary — Given the unique circumstance to this particular property, size of the parcel, adjacent neighbors in favor, request is within the spirit of what Orono is protecting against, and common sense, I request that the City of Orono approve this variance request. I Mi N FIND PINCH TOP 0.68 EAST 0.56 NORTH N PC Exhibit D "".Z N89°23'32"W 730.00 N \050 J o u 051.3 WOOD FENCE 052.3 1053.1 + 1042.7\ 10 1051.3 Woo x 1053.1 1052.2 44.8 1 104.3 94. 040.6 1040.2 1.2'/- 50Z MAP 6' monommial_MAP 6" 1051.E 1049.1 J046.4 x�xx x x .e x x x -x x x 1037.3 x WOOD FENCE 1030.5 x 022.1 ELM 10' 1052.7 x 51.9 051.4/ 0.1 1049.0 x 1043.8x - 1 ELM 8" APP66 MAP 6" MAP 8'� 052. MAP 8' PIN MAP 8" ELM 10/ ` ELM 8" I x x Q50.2� -\ -6 041.36"N 6" � � \\ \ ELM 8" MAP AP 6' I 050.8 x yp \ \ \ x *111, x 40.2 ` �`x 10 5.7\� \ V \� �\ x 10229 ELM 8" x1050.5 \ i MAP 8 MAP 6' 052 yx1051.6 \ \ z P 2XI�� OQR \ OQ�� \ I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \O� \ \ 049. ELM " X 1051.9 I OS \ YOS \ _\ \ 1 1 1 1030 9 1 \ \ A, x 1052.9 2 \ Q \ MAP\ " \ \ \ \ �0 \ MAP 6" / / L0 -/ Y10528 - x1052.8 \ x 1050\. \ x 1048.6 \ Og��\ \ \ I 1 \ \ \ \ \ X 49.9 / x 1051. �05� � \ \ \ \ \ _ \ \ 1 L 2'/- 49.7 /� �/ \ I 1042. \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \�O'- \ \ / -1054 \ \/ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \�O \ / \ 2 0 \ \\ 1 I037.� \ \ v' \ "\ � I927 I / I / x x 105 .5 x 1050. \ MAR 8" \ 1 \ \ \ \ x 1040.7 \ \ \ \ \ PIN 32" x 1050.8 PIN 28" ) PIN 16' PIN 36 \ \ ` \ \ O \ \ PIN I �/ 1054.4 24" 1 PIN 22' \ x 1053.8 MAI' 20" x 051.2 � 1 \ i� \ \ \ \ �� \ \ \ X Id 0.7 105 t1W_a�,..\__iese-lase-P 18- _ A 5 _ 'O A YI P 30'PI 16"1 16 PIN 'S �X \\ x- �3.4p 2E � -� IN 3 M 2� P 20' 8 '� '� gym - \ � \,-� \ \ '. \ D.. \ - �e-lase ease -lase nese- - 03_ .5 x nese nese��- 1051.5 PIN 2 10 .ar--\�PIN/28" x 1052.6 \ E MAP �Q \ \S��T \ I-, \ \ AP \ \ X MAP 611 * 28 dIN�24 PIN 30' PINI 53.8 P�B * PIN 12" �x053.9 / / \ PIN 2X16.. P Soso \ ��2 \ \ Y° \ \ II I SPR 12" SPR 24 �_ 1050.9 MAP 14' ............. ::::: Q4 :r. mos 18' \ \\ OF I \ \ \ `�6'\ \ \ \ ) I CED 20" CED 12 '%PR 20�-x 1051.8 / x 1051.4 �4 I'r:::::::::: c� \ \ \ X 1051.5 / * / SPR 12" \ x 1049 6 1 AR;;2h:f,.:::::::::: mos 4.7 \ \ \ \ 1039.0\, \ \ \ x 31.7 ,1 x PIN 28" SPR 14' x 1051. 10 052. %� x_ BOX 8 \ i/%i� I / .. .::::,,::: \......::..::..:::::::. \ °� \ -------50----1- 0) \x1054.1 CED 16" \ MAP 116 \ \ IN -1 \ \ \ \ X 1 D -_ / y� \::i:`.ii. i. I x /' r _. -N ::::::::::::::..................... .. 10" 042. 0 \ n ...:::::::::::::: 5 0521 �' X 1051.3 m / � \ X 9 I O x 1053.1 _\ \ f�:AN..:2 "::.i..... \ ;;;;. / \ \ 1\ \ Ln 1051.9 O SIR 22 I I `:if047.`0>,:` : iii:. `iiiii»;::: / XI 051.2 % \ n O \ \ \ Q 1054.1 x 1052.3 \ o is `i>. Iz X11037.1 \ E 5:::::::::: E#FS:::. \ \ HAC 6" v G.:;;;;: \::::::::::::::::.... ............................. I� x 1033.1 N N W x \ C\ x 1052.0::::::a45,C�3::i:�:;i: \ r7 I / 053.5 "� ��/ x \ \......:::::::::..:::..:::..:::..::::. ,01 1052.2 ..... ..:: \\� J / x 1052.2 �\ S\�w t:.. x d PRO fl E13 ° \ \ 1 I I 1 c c O 0 L x 1� \ 1052.4 �..............:.::..... 0 o H- 5 BIT JMII\int}��..::::::.......................................... �p Q / � x 105 .7 � \-x-1053.6 I '��� I� \0 \ 1 0 0 Ln � \.. o INV= n ... \ I 1 x 1040.6 I I 0 J 105 x 053.0 x 10524 \ l (n cn � 0- 105.9 xl�x.IPIN 6 I I \ L- Wl� § 14" "1049.4 G� r' c 0' :.:.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::. I \ I I Ill05 2 P 5 d' a,:?p:..::..::..::..:. I \ \ \ x Ios26 P 55' \ �:::::::::::::::::.:. OI\ / x 1053.1 052.6 0 R 20 c' \L FE .::::::::::::::::::::::::. .. I x 104 6 I W O MAP 6" m ( ELM 12" / / x 1052.8 Q G� $ cS MAP 16" JCS 1 52: h I I u7 x \ NP . ` 6AP 2X4" PROPOS D: I \ I \ ELM 10" / x 1053.3 8 x 1052.6 i� S 2 6. 5 x 103 6 � � O x 105 C \6 \ `'' \�' BITUMIVQ S Qk� cn cn N x 10522 ' 105 6 : ELM 2" F O E MAP k4v 2p I I I X 50 I ° x x 1052.2 I &ELM 12' *PIN I4 PIN 8" 05 201 ��O FF -6 -- I. 6 MAT 18 5. \ \ I 1 -' � �� \ Q / \ x 141.4 I I 1 \ \ O II 52.2 ---- 10522 I ELM 10' --\- -- PI 12" - UNIQUE J - ----.: .........--------- ` C'O O : e1\�O S (0 �6 M� 2- 2 --- �; « . .. I� I 1 70.0 I � w O x BOX 215.8 EX/ST/NG ------ -- 2$�ROO�.'� cP fE ��O :,... ... L\10 \ �_ I I 1 Z: z Ptrd�6' X(1053 0 I 1 0 0 I I BOX 8" / I HOUSE �O��C� \6� "Z-3 �� \ FE111111111111111111 =1055. \ --rI0429 I I ` 1 1 ELM 16' �• 9 ..."' .`..`........ o E=1055.5 of � / FOOTPR/NT o x I 2.3 �O �P P flPO S ? :.::::.:: :.::::: PROP SED B A N , o z� 10 1 5 "IIII J 1105. x 1052.1 ? �j 4 $ 105% GP x051.2 X° IQ IO UMtNfQ f ,:::::::::::::::NfA, 18 16� BFE�1042.0 Ivi I v o I I 1 I x 1035.9 e U) a� x I !� 051. / -1052 ( 052. lb 5 ............. \ \ - -- I-� I O I I I I CO 1051.3 x 1051 ALM 16 x \ / I x 1052.2 SPR 20" SPR 18" i� 2 8 x j�51.5 d / 1 Ir 1 911 11 . O T Lu � X � 0 I -rLM 16" I x 1051.7 / t� \ 1 � x .cl l d� , O ° p 1047.6 \ I o Q j x 1052.2 �. I O j l.8 ° Q P a/ x 47.7 \ 70.0 L � I x 1 1.5 1 0 ELM 6" / C SIPR 14' x �\ �x'I 19 \Oh /OS / .° QO�\ a °%° 50 4 x I / / x ) x / I \ I I 1 to \ / \ .: � _ 1 1051.6 % 1 49./ it P \ 1 w \ _/ @ _ X 1 )` / F\R 40" rZ t ;; G fix` O I 6's SP 14' H 20'1 1 / I \ T 051.9 048 I z SPR 6" SPR o QOO k� s `x 10.7 o x I g x 104 8 1 I \o -1050 0 0 11 2 O� oc M 22" x 051.7 12�I O l �/� x 1050.2 x 1050 SN SF 6 MAP22 E� f �tK J / 043.1 1><,/ I I I -� x 1050.5 x 051.0- X 105L2 x 51.1 �' I x 1050.4 1049 8 \MAP O d / POQ I I 1 1 I 1350--' I � O 0' x 37.4 \ T / I I I I I P 49.4 PIN \ m 101049.6 . o x 049.9 V, '� O x PIN 8" WPIN d .... .. 181, 1049.9-- _ rA x I � \ 2 / % 1 0 052 0 k 1042.0 l I 1049.3x x 1049.6 x l X 1050.1 x 050.�1049.8y x 1049. \OS � x 1040. I ... '% PIN 6 nese 2 -lase -lase -lase- 49.666 �9 a -ease- ease -nese ` 1asa a-�a-less _tea -lase -lase -lase- nese- 1 46.3 / 49.2 x 1049.3 I o x 1049.6 4 o i x 04 �ese��ese �a tee- nese ase-�esg-ase / I - - _ \ 1049.0 1048.6 * ... \ / I- , �( - 48ij 1050 � / , ... �Ex T \ I , P 24" MAP 10 _II - - SPR 8" P 8" �6' / / o x 1042 O � ! I I \ 1049.1 048.3 \ � - X x-1049.0 / \ AP O \04$ / T / / y \ \ BOX 8 I 048.2 \ Jp4� HAC 16" � -_ / / x 1039.7 I I } x \ x � . \ x 104 PIN 8" / x AP 6" �Oq6 � / x 047.1 x 1047.4 MAP 48.0 041- .......\j..... � - �'� 1048.1 x 0 7.4 047.3 � / / x 1043.1 / / / / I I /1 -1046 \ M P� Slx CCCSSS 1045.8 1 46.7 1047.6 . 9 a.:::: x 1047.9 ' /x I X 107.3 0 1047.6 / �- ____/ / / / / 041.5 O� x 1047.4 x 1047.7 \ yp MAP 6" 1047.3x _- - \ \ . AP 22' x __1 'ORg �� / /4 / __/ / AP 16"C G _..x 10 3 / 1036.2 X�q"_� 1047.6 / / x 1046.5 PIN 8' ELM 12' ELi�6'� / / x Ia \1045.3 \ BOX �" x C�J, 0" \ 1046.9 \ - 0�9 / ELM I � F<M / N/ / / / x 1041.8 x 103.7 / PIN 6 x 10 / / X \ \ / 1046.4 046.3 �0�6i x 1045.6 PIN 4" 14.46.4- - -1046 � O� x 43 �� / / / / / O,e LAC 14 / x 1045.7 / / / \ ,1Q,\ -z - l � 1044.0 / / / / � o3�/ / Q 1041.0 ��\ o \ 0"-1045.0 x x 10 6.5 8i \ `.` \ \ \ / 046- 04 1045.1 �x 1044.8 1044.3 / / / � 1042.0 / / T3 / �s 1045.8 x \ 44. 045.8 / �/ / / / / / 1-1 / / j 1 41.1 x 1039.8 / / L ��. / \ 045.1 / / / / lb I \ / / x 10 7.5 JO x 1033.0 \ N\ \��y/�\ \ X045. �0� / x 1044.1 X044- \ x 1044.3 'j / / Ix 042.9 x 1041.7 / / / / / / "I \ \ x 1043.5 x 1043,\ \ � / / / / x 1044.2 % / \ \ \ \ � \ o 043.9~044 x 1044.2 �//::: _ \i x 1043.8 x 1043.2 � / / x 1040.6 1039.1/ / �103� / ,- 1-1 / 09.4\ 1-11 \I III- �_ /'..':'. \xH1044.0 _-�- � - ,`� ��/ D,e / / // // �� \ \ \ 043.4 x 1042.9 x 1041.7 0� /x 1037.7 �Q /\ \ \ / \ \ \ 1043.8 / i x 1042.4 x 10424 / / / � / / 1038.7/ / \ \ I \ � \ \ \ I- � x 1042.6 / � 104 - x 1042.4 � � x 1039.9 / �4� �� \ \ \ yp4 � �\04r - - x 1041.8 / / / / ACV Qv 0 4.9\ \ O��\ \ / \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ 1042.6 1042= x 1041.2 x 1041.6 - x 1041.2 0 / / x 1038.6 X 1040.8 \ \ _ _ - � - \ _ CO (b\,\Yo a \ \ � \ \ \ \ / \,/0 \ � Cti v Y \ \ \ ,// 1040.9 0 V \ OLR \ / \ \ _- \ \ 1041. /\04� BLOCK 1 o \ \ \ ,� \ \ \ \ \ \ l _ LOT 2 \ \ yp3g� \ 1039.8 � i / 1039.7 ::::::::. \ \ y°`� \ ,<\ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-- _ \ \ \ ...- 1038.9 �1038� - I)�.'Q�_\ Yp \ \ / I \ \ o \ x 1036.3 \ \ 1038.7 -_ i / \ s0, \ \ \ \ \\ \\ �-_-- _ __ �... _ - \ \ \ \ - � �) \ Y0 \ x "'p3 \ � x 1037.2 _ice \c\ \ E� \ \ \ \ \ _ � � x 1036.7 - - - --1036 n \ \ \ \ \ 0 1 \ \ 1036.7 x 10 .2-` `/ I-\ \ \ \ \ BOX C \ 1036.1 ''' .... i \ \, \ �\ \ \ \ SEPTI \ 035.2 ... �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ iuLANHOLES RE LL 1035.3 .22.4 0.7\ 035.5 :.:.:.. � �A \ \ \ `14\ \ \ S 35.2 -I GFE= 1034.7 1 ° a �::: 1034.7 ' - \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1034.3x 034.7 0 1034.7 X034.8. .- - -X034 \ \ \11 \ \ \ N, Y x 1033.E \ 505 0 r No a d ..�.::. \ \ \ \ 0`�� R TAINING l03 9034.4 r7 �ONCRET '° . > \ \ a'k \ \ \ \�\ L - DRIVEW Zo::: -_ \ /� \ \ � Ssk � \ \ \ 0�2 033.9 ✓a � :: \ \ \ / ', �� \ \\O�\ \ 103,5 1034.0 _ 16.0 034.6 5.8 a 033.0. 1-1 \ \ //� ��� I'll \ x 031.8\ � '15.5 2 �\ x WOE= 100 . ° 03.4 033.2 .2 032 11-1 \ �/ \ \ \ Asq \ 0 034.7 1034.3 y _ _ EXISTING OU 10322 South Line of NE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 \ \ �`so.4 \ WOE= � 033.8 1033.1 0� 4XX North Line of SE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 \ \ 1034.5 \ /\ \\\I \ y0P\ \E\ININ�_ 7 02.5 48.3 03. 033.b / \o 1-1 O\ \ LL E 10 � / 1030.0 :: 1030.1 \ \ / \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ N0\O 030.6 0 I. 03\2.4 1033.0 o �3.3 / Z \ / \ \ \l \ \ 11�00 \ \ \\t asst I. CK � i x 1031.4 / x 1030.4 \ \ j \ \ \ \ \I \ \\ \\ \ \430.0 �631.Z / \ \ \ 0\ \\\ \ °�4 \ \ \\x 1028.7\7 � x��29 8 / / \\// \ \I- � \ "Vo \ \ \ \ \ _\ x10295 ---x�--&4t,,` / 027.5 \ \ \ �G\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I-,1027.3 / I--- o \ \ \ \ - - �� _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --/ �O:. / \� \ \ \ % \ \ \ \ \ \ � - - - - - �� Existing Elevations - House #1 Proposed Elevations 1 2,� \ \ O' \ \ \ - - � / %\ Garage Floor Elevation = 1034.7 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 1055.5 ~ y \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - B� -- Walkout Floor Elevation = 1034.7 Proposed First Floor Elevation -1056.35 \__< \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ _ _\ �c --alk Walkout Floor Elevation = 1034.5 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 1045.46 I nyo\ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - _ �Oz4 8 1024.9B� Proposed Golf Sim. Floor Elevation = 1043.52 c x U \ Proposed Barn First Floor Elevation = 1055.0 a a� Fence ties are shown on the R\ / \ O/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�� ft Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover m° _ I tL J side of the boundary line that \ / T \ \ \ \ \ _ - - - - - _ \ \ � Net Lot Area = 1,297,369 S.F. Net Lot Area = 1,297,369 S.F. X the fence is located on. \ \ \ \ \ \ House #1 Area = 2,255 S.F. Proposed House Area = 4,246 S.F. I �.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:........ 013.7 \ \ \\ \ \ \ - _ - _ \ \ \ House #2 Area = 2,430 S.F. Proposed Front Porch Area = 688 S.F. r 4 /- \ \ \ Screen Porch Area = 78 S.F. Proposed Cabana Area = 239 S.F. x . \ : -) 0, \ 8 \ \ \ \ _ - - - \ 1022.8 Bit. Driveway Area = 8,150 S.F. Proposed Pool Area = 800 S.F. .\.. ...... ..... � .. \ \ 1022.7 Y p \ \ �\ Conc. Driveway Area = 1,061 S.F. Proposed Pool Patio Area = 1,713 S.F. o..... \ Conc. Walk Area = 128 S.F. Proposed Barn Area = 2,800 S.F. \ ...\... \ \ \\� -� \ - p - ......o..: \ \ Paver Patio #1 Area - 336 SY Pro Proposed Bam Cano Area - 209 S.F. �................. \ \ p Canopy 5 5 � 014.6'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' . . � ---:,*/O/ 2 � .............. \ - �\ Paver Patio #2 Area = 430 S.F Proposed Bituminous Area = 7,963 S.F. \ \ \ 015.2 \ /\ oy \ \ Pavers Area = 177 SY Total Area = 18,658 S.F. \ ... j: .................... \ ............... ...................... \ ��--:- \\ \ Retaining Wall Area = 74 S.F 4..2 ................. \ \\ \\ --- .....:.:.. Deck Area = 26 S.F. Existing Hardcover (to Remain) /.... \ \ �.......... \ 0N0 \ 020.6 1020.9 Total Area = 15,145 S.F. Ex. House #1 Area = 2,255 S.F. \ \ 016.4 \ \ Coverage = 0.01% Ex. Bit. Driveway Area = 5,599 S.F. /...................... \ Ex. Conc. Driveway Area = 1,061 S.F. - J - I ......� &.... Ex. Conc. Walk Area _ 128 S.F. 0 0 \i\ M/ \ Ex. Paver Patio #1 Area - 336 S.F ~\ .% \� \y� 9� .. 7 Ex. Retaining Wall Area 74 S.F I . ..... Ex. Deck Area = 26 S.F. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: _..... .. i \ 0/8 \ Total Area = 9,479 S.F. BEING 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJONING LOT LINES, AND . 016.2::... \:: ,,(( \ BEING 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES �L \/p o o......\...... _ \ r \ AS SHOWN ON PLAT 9 oy.r, \. /0722 \ Total CombinedA rex 28,137 S.F. . Coverage = 0.02% \ \�\ . �. \ \ :::0..... ........................ ............ �.................. .................. 1018• a DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED ..:.:: .. o Lot 2, Block 1, HILLAWAY FARM, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota I \ 018:4: 1018.6 HU g p p tY ... ........-.. o. 018.7 01EI. : STANDARD NOTES SURVEY LEGEND \ :7 io- ;;� . .... 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT © PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION O IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET ca� POWER POLE FEE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION X DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET FLs LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND (S SANITARY MANHOLE CONCRETE * REBAR MONUMENT FOUND® SANITARY CLEANOUT BITUMINOUS A PK NAIL MONUMENT SET s@ STORM MANHOLE --..-a---L- BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN D CONCRETE CURB SURVEY CONTROL POINT 4 FLARED END SECTION -- - 960 - - CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS --------- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER � TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED or DRAIN TILE 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER O TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE El ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 0 YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS GAS UNDERGROUND 0 LIGHT POLE ❑u UTILITY PEDESTAL OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY ® FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑v UTILITY VAULT . TREE LINE =9FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP ® WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE 0 WATER METER » STORM SEWER ® FUEL PUMP c& WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND IIII FUEL TANK ® WELL CDCDCX=x=x= RETAINING WALL PT PROPANE TANK ® MONITORING WELL OTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP WATERMAIN ( GAS VALVE D4 GATE VALVE cy� TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 GAS MANHOLE HYDRANT ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' RAILROAD TRACKS ce GENERATOR51 IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL ® GUARD ITP 71v POST INDICATOR VALVE 0- RAILROAD SWITCH 0 HAND HOLE _u__ SIGN 0SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 9th day of May, 2023. C�V_ Z44e �19 Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 schmidt@sathre.com FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION DM,AK,ABE 1 JRS 5/23/2023 REVISED BARN CANOPY DRAWN JRS CHECKED DLS DATE 12/15/21 ORI Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. �FtS �� C9 ZgUJ o \;1 m N SFR S 1) Site Address: 3760 Watertown Road, Orono, Minnesota, 55369 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO301F, effective date of 11/04/2016. Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 1,297,887 s.f. - 29.79 acres Wet Area: ±6,518 s.f. - ±0.15 acres Net Area: ±1,297,369 s.f. - ±29.65 acres *we do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 3) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: 2713 AL which has an elevation of: 997.33 feet (NAVD88). 4) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR-lA (One Family Rural Residential - 5 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 100 feet Street Side: 100 feet Interior Side: 50 feet Rear: 100 feet Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer Height: 30 feet Hardcover: xx percent of lot area Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 50 feet Street Side: 50 feet Interior Side: 20 feet Rear: 20 feet Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 5) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 6) Wetland Delineation: No wetland delineation was performed for this survey. Wetland shown hereon is based on recorded plat. SATH RE BERGQUIST INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 TWP.118-RGE.23-SEC.32 Hennepin County ORONO) MINNESOTA SEE PAGE 2 FOR COMPLETE BOUNDARY INFORMATION FILE NO. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 79737-001 PREPARED FOR: REVIS L. STEPHENSON III 2 IL �q c OBS � MIVV RD. V = V I Ir 0 o C 12 I SITE i N m D T * - m M Y S wgD rFT0 z C R� o M A Y A L g P R�. E USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. �FtS �� C9 ZgUJ o \;1 m N SFR S 1) Site Address: 3760 Watertown Road, Orono, Minnesota, 55369 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO301F, effective date of 11/04/2016. Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 1,297,887 s.f. - 29.79 acres Wet Area: ±6,518 s.f. - ±0.15 acres Net Area: ±1,297,369 s.f. - ±29.65 acres *we do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 3) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: 2713 AL which has an elevation of: 997.33 feet (NAVD88). 4) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR-lA (One Family Rural Residential - 5 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 100 feet Street Side: 100 feet Interior Side: 50 feet Rear: 100 feet Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer Height: 30 feet Hardcover: xx percent of lot area Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 50 feet Street Side: 50 feet Interior Side: 20 feet Rear: 20 feet Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 5) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 6) Wetland Delineation: No wetland delineation was performed for this survey. Wetland shown hereon is based on recorded plat. SATH RE BERGQUIST INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 TWP.118-RGE.23-SEC.32 Hennepin County ORONO) MINNESOTA SEE PAGE 2 FOR COMPLETE BOUNDARY INFORMATION FILE NO. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 79737-001 PREPARED FOR: REVIS L. STEPHENSON III 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 2, Block 1, HILLAWAY FARM, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 3760 Watertown Road, Orono, Minnesota, 55369 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. INV- 27053CO301F, effective date of 11/04/2016. 990.8 Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 1,297,887 s.f. 29.79 acres Wet Area: (6,518 s.f. (0.15 acres rl Net Area: (1,297,369 s.f. (29.65 acres FIND IP 1/211 4, N D I P West Line of NE 1 /2 N 89 0 23 132 I I W 541.9 9 990.6 — II (" *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description / / — <I Moss SW 1/4 of Section 32 I42'4811 IIL 3) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: 2713 AL which has an elevation of: 997.33 feet (NAVD88). 7 I I WETLAND --�\ 4 75 0�0- 12" DRAIN 4) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR -IA (One Family Rural Residential - 5 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, _o W �� 12r DRAIN 984.7 height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: N "986.0 X o Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 100 feet °o Street Side: 100 feet O ,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese ,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese � �,\ - East Line of NW 1/4, i SW 1 /4 of Section 32 p - a - Interior Side: 50 feet O X DRAINAGE & ; \- _-APPROXIMATE Rear: 100 feet Lo I UTILITY -t SSS%%�2, EDGE OF WETLAND M EASEMENT I -5 DO (Per Plot) Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer W 50 - Height: 30 feet --100-- / c_V Hardcover: xx percent of lot area 111 ni�'I � \ CV X I I I�L_VvfIt\ I m \ I o i I Accessory Structure Setbacks -Front: 50 feet nT n v v (o I Street Side: 50 feet IL _v _ _ East Line of Interior Side: 20 feet \ N I SW 1/4 of Section 32 Rear: 20 feet Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer \ \ - `ND PINCH TOP I I 0 0.68 EAST m \ - 5 0.56; NORTH n N8902332"W 730.00 - FND IP k2-1 I 0 Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for 11012.3 m the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. J 1 0.17 FAST Q / 5 > �OS� \ OS \RS (�0 R \ 1\ \ \ \ py022�\\ 0 0.37 NO iTH LLJ � \ 0° \ 1\ ,ese—,ese—,ese—,ese—,es§—,ese—,eeaJ i We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. +LO ,ems �� o \YOS�S� 5) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There maybe underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. , p e4 \ I Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise W ( V- a„ \ 1 -il _� before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property Before m J I I I 1 i digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. `�'o I l ICO I �1 0I215 ,-�� e - L 1 1 1 1 I 6) Wetland Delineation: No wetland delineation was performed for this survey. Wetland shown hereon is based on recorded plat. 052 o 05 eJf n `ND IP 112"U)I\ ,eae �� — _i _ V 1046.8 I�--100--- --10 -104i?r / �_% o� �� / OA6 ` /il E ko` 046 ~/�/ / // ���l�l/ O Cb "101 04 7- �1p4 / / / �O i - �,�\ N �OX1042\ _ X042 ,' (0 X04 4o-- BLOCK 1 04 0 to 4�Jo38— LOT 2 I o \ Cby0`;a —1036 I I�-I \ O�� 0' r 34 NE Corner of JE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 {0 _ South Line of NE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 North Line of SE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 — ND K NAIL MAG \ 101: \ �\�\�� _� I __ East Line of NE 1/4, n r� It /006 /P j2„ O� \ � — 8"k SW \ SW 1 /4 of Section 32 nL_v�.t� I \ i '' � I 5 5 SEE PAGE 1 FOR DETAILED SITE INFORMATION FIELD CREW NO. BY D,AK,ABE 1 JRS DRAWN JRS CHECKED DLS DATE 12/15/21 DATE REVISION 5/23/2023 REVISED BARN CANOPY -_ West Line of SE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that T am a duly Licensed S CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �tG�R SCiRL STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s FO EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 9th day of May, 2023. _ AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND U' SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES N w THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY 4� LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 cv 1� RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. FRS P �P Schmidt@sathre.com East Line of SE 1/4, SW 1/4 of Section 32 Np R�� Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM TWP:118-RGE.23-SEC.32 Hennepin County ORONO, MINNESOTA I 2 Y X NX Fence ties are shown on the o = I .= side of the boundary line that M in L J the fence is located on x J I L I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: BEING 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJONING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON PLAT SURVEY LEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cQ--) POWER POLE FIFE �q c CDU OBS • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G GUY WIRE GFE < RD. DRILL HOLE FOUND V ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET I LIFT STATION LOE 0 0 X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND C SANITARY MANHOLE a; CONCRETE � REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® I ;:>:>':;si; i.:>; '';: BITUMINOUS PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE SITE PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® i N CABLE TV m PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN O CONCRETE CURB - SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q T —96o CONTOUR EXISTING — co A/C UNIT Y SZ CONTOUR PROPOSED ED TREE DECIDUOUS C GUARD RAIL RrowN 0 M DT DRAIN TILE OE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED A ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND O Y O A L FENCE m c� ❑T P FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND % Ro, O UTILITY MANHOLE E GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE ❑U UTILITY PEDESTAL OHI OVERHEAD UTILITY ®F FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑V SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM TWP:118-RGE.23-SEC.32 Hennepin County ORONO, MINNESOTA I 2 Y X NX Fence ties are shown on the o = I .= side of the boundary line that M in L J the fence is located on x J I L I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: BEING 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJONING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON PLAT SURVEY LEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cQ--) POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION )1( DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET Es LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND IS SANITARY MANHOLE a; CONCRETE REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT ;:>:>':;si; i.:>; '';: BITUMINOUS PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN OTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB - SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q FLARED END SECTION —96o CONTOUR EXISTING — 0 A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -0-0-0-0-0- GUARD RAIL E❑ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND O ELECTRIC METER O TELEPHONE MANHOLE —X—X— FENCE m ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND % YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS— GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE ❑U UTILITY PEDESTAL OHI OVERHEAD UTILITY ®F FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑V UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP © WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE WATER METER >> STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP c& WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND Fr FUEL TANK Q WELL RETAINING WALL PT PROPANE TANK MONITORING WELL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP WATERMAIN �Q GAS VALVE M GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS MANHOLE "(f HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATOR ITIRWI IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Piv POST INDICATOR VALVE C- RAILROAD SWITCH ❑H HAND HOLE SIGN 0 SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX sa SOIL BORING 0 WETLAND BUFFER SIGN FILE NO. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 79737-001 PREPARED FOR: 2 REVIS L. STEPHENSON III 2 Z I zo 111 Q C (� r 0 - PARTY PARTY ROOM TOP OF SUBFLR 10555' � 1 C - Q v H TOP OF LOFT LEVEL CSUBFLR - C - til 0 N Q STORAGE LEVEL TOP OF SLAB = 1055.0' C 4 i M U LUR LEVEL TOP OF SLAB = 1042-0' METAL ROOF I 6" HARDIE FRIEZE PER ELEVS. I HARDIE OR CEDAR VERT. SIDING 8" REVEAL 6" HARDIE WINDOW TRIM BOARDS I THIN STONE PER ELEVS. 'MID POINT OF ROOF 12 4F,� 1049.6 - HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. lz lz (12/'2 36"x24" CsLAZINCs 24'-6" 6/12 12 8„ 12 36"x24" _ CsLAXINCs N x� CUPOLA PER CONTRACTOR TYPICAL 24'-6" on. LL&I on I I WSJ TIJI!Em Ili I I I I I I I I I I I I lllllllli� oil 5AIRN FRONT - SE E L E VAT I ON SCALE: I/4" ■ I' -m" J1UJR LEVEL OP OF SLAB 1042.0' 12 �12 12 6F:� AT FURRING OVERHANG — — JI—�l-1L- 12 12V u NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LARSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. 8" 12 �12 12> 48.lx48ll CUPOLA PER 36°x24 CONITRACTOR �LAZIN� METAL ROOF N 6" HARDIE FRIEZE PER ELEVS. HARDIE OR CEDAR VERT. SIDING 00 8" REVEAL 12 6" HARDIE WINDOW TRIM BOARDS �12 THIN STONE PER ELEVS. mlilill I KINI 1\1 - I * I - �q�qm 1z niuF� Ul?Rfur1aCs ��F II 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I II II II 11 � ai is SAM RIGHT - NE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" ■ 1' -0" MID POINT 1049 - HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu m lu N luN Lu N Z3 Z O Z O U 'Q >D Lu W z q � al Q W W !L Lu U z Lu Cl- t� L O Zu O 'Q z L r 3 OL Lu V! 1 OF Q (P � II 12 r TOP OF I 12 LOFT LEVEL I SUBFLR CACqB C14 � I W �Lu (Pin III I PARTY ROOM TOP OF STORAGE SUBFLR LEVEL TOP I = 10555' OF SLAB - = 1055.0' v CA J1UJR LEVEL OP OF SLAB 1042.0' 12 �12 12 6F:� AT FURRING OVERHANG — — JI—�l-1L- 12 12V u NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LARSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. 8" 12 �12 12> 48.lx48ll CUPOLA PER 36°x24 CONITRACTOR �LAZIN� METAL ROOF N 6" HARDIE FRIEZE PER ELEVS. HARDIE OR CEDAR VERT. SIDING 00 8" REVEAL 12 6" HARDIE WINDOW TRIM BOARDS �12 THIN STONE PER ELEVS. mlilill I KINI 1\1 - I * I - �q�qm 1z niuF� Ul?Rfur1aCs ��F II 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I 1I II II II 11 � ai is SAM RIGHT - NE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" ■ 1' -0" MID POINT 1049 - HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu m lu N luN Lu N Z3 Z O Z O U 'Q >D Lu W z q � al Q W W !L Lu U z Lu Cl- t� L O Zu O 'Q z L r 3 OL Lu V! 1 OF �/12 NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LARSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. 12 12V 12 12� 36"x24" CsLAZINCx 6/12 METAL ROOFING I I ILL -L-1 I iLLJLL=L1 [LL=Lil 11", ILL=Lfii� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 8„ 12 �2 F."x24" CsLAZINCs 48Ix4811 CUPOLA PER CONTRACTOR TYPICAL 5AIRN LEFT - SW ELEVATION SCALE: 1/411=11-011 COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. ���rso�rso�rs�raw oars—o.�rs—o.�rs—o.�r= �s-o.�rso/,mss—o/mss—o �/,mss—o%mss �� ��� so ��� ��� ��� �� f��s=•mss=•mss=•�: o'er �'� rso.yrs-o.yrs-o.yrs-o.yrs-o.�rs-o/,mss-o/mss-o/,mss-o%�soWI f aw 0 .Q TOP OF LOFT LEVEL SUBFLR N Q Lu STORAGE LEVEL TOP OF SLAB ,-1055.0' L1R LEVEL TOP OF SLAB = 1042.0' METAL ROOF b" HARDIE FRIEZE PER ELEVS. HARDIE OR CEDAR VERT. SIDING 8" REVEAL b" HARDIE WINDOW TRIM BOARDS THIN STONE PER ELEVS. 12 a4 H Q _1 A PARTY ROOM TOP OF PARTY ROOM SUBFLR = 10555' z5f ���rso�rso�rs�raw oars—o.�rs—o.�rs—o.�r= �s-o.�rso/,mss—o/mss—o �/,mss—o%mss �� ��� so ��� ��� ��� �� f��s=•mss=•mss=•�: o'er �'� rso.yrs-o.yrs-o.yrs-o.yrs-o.�rs-o/,mss-o/mss-o/,mss-o%�soWI f aw 0 .Q TOP OF LOFT LEVEL SUBFLR N Q Lu STORAGE LEVEL TOP OF SLAB ,-1055.0' L1R LEVEL TOP OF SLAB = 1042.0' METAL ROOF b" HARDIE FRIEZE PER ELEVS. HARDIE OR CEDAR VERT. SIDING 8" REVEAL b" HARDIE WINDOW TRIM BOARDS THIN STONE PER ELEVS. 12 a4 ROOF PLAN Z SCALE: 1/8"=1'-m" TOP OF LOFT LEVEL v M 0 N Q Wu STORAGE LEVEL TOP OF SLAB 1055.0' b s v� ,n U LWR LEVEL TOP OF SLAB 1042.0' 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu ..lu N ~ N N � J � Tj Z3 � O Z O n� g Z U ~� w� W Q W O � al Q w W (L Lu U z Lu vI L O Z W O � z L r n: 0- Lu t� f52 2 OF -1 H Q _i PARTY ROOM TOP OF SUBFLR = 10555' ROOF PLAN Z SCALE: 1/8"=1'-m" TOP OF LOFT LEVEL v M 0 N Q Wu STORAGE LEVEL TOP OF SLAB 1055.0' b s v� ,n U LWR LEVEL TOP OF SLAB 1042.0' 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu ..lu N ~ N N � J � Tj Z3 � O Z O n� g Z U ~� w� W Q W O � al Q w W (L Lu U z Lu vI L O Z W O � z L r n: 0- Lu t� f52 2 OF -1 COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. vl Ird ' 11 I I LIJ �I 5AIRN FIND&OWER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4"1111111-011 SEE SWEET 56 FOR ENGINEERING NOTATIONS I 67 I6' -3"i TO CORNER — — FIER SURVFY — NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LAR50N ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 1-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE EXT. FND. INSUL. IS APPLIED, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 3-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE NOTED11 - MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOW CODES (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) MARVIN 'WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICE' FOR FALL PREVENTION AS REQ'D. NOTE - ALL WINDOW E DOOR HEAD HGTS. TO BE SET AT 8'-0" AT LWR. LEVEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SQUARE FOOTAGE LOFT - 2125* PARTY ROOM - 980 MAIN STORAGE - 1820* LOWER STORAGE - 936* 1055.5 CONC. INTxxx �vv 1055.5.PL CONI 1055 5 _ 1.055 5 -_ 1055.31 05OR R O1==- w 30x80 HALF -LITE FUTURE FUTURE FURE 2° CLG Fax WASH STALL 0 C STALL II' O4' STALL 0-_ M 7RTD. 4-7 x 12'-5" CONC. -0 12'-011 ,-0 24" FLOOR TRUSSESXA BY SUPPLIER6x6 POST ON 18" DIA. FTG. GONG. CONC. 6-_-_ 7 Irn � WALL -B8 r----------------------------------------------------- }y' -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_L-_2-_O--_- - -_ WF -2 ___________________________________________________---------------------- _3 ----------------- --- _3 5 1/2" 11'-5 1/4" CLC 12° II° /2LOWER STORAGE $° W CORRIDOR o 22'-ID2 -9 CONC. 10 ' p I 44'-10" x 12'-10" = WF -2 C I W j I� IROOF TRUSSES I1Z `= N En j PER SUPPLIER - _ lil 5 it i ml i i - i I I I i e I I = ----------------------------------------------- -------------- r------------------------------------� ---------------------- r-� ----------------------r---1--------------- r- -----------------------------------------------------' --------------------- - �- - 6---------------c----------------- - _ _ - - j III � -24" FLR 36" WALL SLOPED G.T. TO STAIR _ i 6x6 TRTD. = 3 -4 4'-10 112 I 11/2 POST ON IS" DIA. FTC. m FUTURE 24" FLOOR TRUSSES FUTURE _ BY SUPPLIERW-O CLC0 FUTURE II 11-0CLCFW-AL-LB-81 rU STA CLG P LL _ 4-, STALL 14 1 TACK RM= WF 0 = �r i t+ @ GONG. GONG. 1 1 14'-," x 11'-7 x i i i i TILE = WALL -B8 Bim, a I = (o" I 1 = = @ cv STAR r, STORAGE 0 ' UP 'll x n " - �t C4 l 2u WALL -B3 WF -5 i = = 2�c8 0 i 0 2�c8 cvl u' 12 -% i = 41-611- = i:: 1 -b " ON t ' +n _ 11/2" - i i - i i �t \I L--------- ---------1053.0---------------------- -- ---- - - - - -1- - - --1-- - - --_7--- la 1053.0.... _,.., , ......., .: 1055 9 1053.0 x.1055,.5:, , 1054.5 . ,1055.5 rp 1054.5 1055.5 1055.31 44 - Ird ' 11 I I LIJ �I 5AIRN FIND&OWER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4"1111111-011 SEE SWEET 56 FOR ENGINEERING NOTATIONS I 67 I6' -3"i TO CORNER — — FIER SURVFY — NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LAR50N ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 1-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE EXT. FND. INSUL. IS APPLIED, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 3-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE NOTED11 - MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOW CODES (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) MARVIN 'WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICE' FOR FALL PREVENTION AS REQ'D. NOTE - ALL WINDOW E DOOR HEAD HGTS. TO BE SET AT 8'-0" AT LWR. LEVEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SQUARE FOOTAGE LOFT - 2125* PARTY ROOM - 980 MAIN STORAGE - 1820* LOWER STORAGE - 936* LOWER STALLS - 1191* TOTAL (FIN.) - 8252* SQUARE FOOTAGE HOUSE F.P. - 5036 BALI F.P. - 3009* POOL - 800111 SHED - TBD* EX HOUSE - 2255* TOTAL (FIN.) - 11100* i 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu c(i m lu N F Q N luLu N tj)� d) Z3 ♦nom W 1J- � N w Z w W �O Z z m� � Q Q O W W 1L Lu U z Lu cn VI L O Z L O z L r O3: lL Lu t� 30E-1 D I 1 I 0 wuuu wuumuuuwuumuuuwuuulu � wi I I I I I I e L ---- N COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. n 1 2 B6 B6 10'-0" 4'-51/2" 12'-4" 10'-91/4" 2'-51/4" 5'-0" lo T UPR 5'-0" 40'-S 1/4" _ _ T UPR I _ 1 2-2x8 FULL d ELCA ELCA I ELCA ELCA ELCA 2-2x8 TRIMMERS \ 3159-E 3159-E �3159-E 3153-E 3159-E V V L 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLATEV V� \� V 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLATE _ v -2x8 v v x8 =v I -I6" LVL CO - o co 3" 3" __ 3" PSL COL" O URINAL 9'-I I/8"-_ CLCs j 2-2x8 FULL a _--------------MECN 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = 2-2x8 TRIMMERS �r SPACE j BY SUPPLIER 42" VANITY I = 24" FLR TRS V-1 1/8" CLGI - 4 ' - FIRE BY BANSUPPLIER '-0 il N j 0 - = `' RATED 4 TILE -- -- - -- -- -- - _ - FLP_ G.T. _ - - 30x80xw i I i / I XFD. I - 7 I I I i 24" FLOOR TRUSSES I 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = j BY SUPPLIER BY SUPPLIER = BY SUPPLIER = i � I al 9'-6 3/8" CLG= 9'-I 1/8" CLG S _ - P,4RTY ROOM 45'-0" x 39'-0" _ `n 23'-6" x 21'-0" CONC._ M CRPT = j ! coo I - i I 1 ! Q 21 1 I - 24" FLOOR TRUSSES / 38(FD BY SUPPLIER MND ' 4 �-z! = I 0 1 I KITCHENETTE N N = I r------------------------------------------------ N__� _ 5'-4 3/4" 13'-4" %Q1 5'4" 1Ai 4'-10" FLR Cx.T. I - I 2x6 BRCS. 6 5'-5 1/2" I I = I DN 0 24" FLOOR TRUSSES =- BY SUPPLIER = 22R �t _ 41 I LIN 5-I/4"x1" 30x80 12-2x8 FULL < = 2-2x8 FULL < I 30x80 - PSL COL. I HALF 2-2x8 TRIMMERS = 2-2x8 TRIMMERS HALF - i -LITE 3-I6" LVL = _[ 11 -LITE 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLA E 2-2x10 160x80IO.H.DOO = 2-2x10 _ 2x8 w/ 2x10 I R = 2x8 w/ 2x10 STEP = I SILL PLATE I = SILL PLATE _ ---------------------------------------- -------- 1 ._._._._._._ ._._._._._._.-. .__._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ - ....... 5'-0" 40'-9 I/4" TC UPR 21'-11 1/2" 13'-0 1/2" - 10-9 1/4" 2-3 1/4" 3'-3 3/4" 5'-1 3/4" 45'-9 1/4" = 5'-1" 16-1 3/4" _ 10'-0" 1 2 B6 B6 5ARN MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" SEE SHEET B(o FOR ENGINEERING NOTATIONS 01 NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LAR50N ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS v 1-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF 0 FOUNDATION WHERE EXT. FND. INSUL. IS APPLIED, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. Ism v Cq NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 3-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE NOTED. MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOW CODES (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) MARVIN 'WINDOW OPENING CONTROL pEVICE' FOR FALL PREVENTION AS REQ'p. NOTE - ALL WINDOW E DOOR HEAD HGTS. TO BE SET AT 8'-0" AT MAIN LEVEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 16'-4_1/2"* TO CORNER — — — — — — — PFR SURVEY — — Ly �ul> old Lu a� r SQUARE FOOTAGE LOFT - 2125* PARTY ROOM - 980 Q I I I N I 1 I 0 wuuu wuumuuuwuumuuuwuuulu � wi I I I I I I e L ---- N COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. n 1 2 B6 B6 10'-0" 4'-51/2" 12'-4" 10'-91/4" 2'-51/4" 5'-0" lo T UPR 5'-0" 40'-S 1/4" _ _ T UPR I _ 1 2-2x8 FULL d ELCA ELCA I ELCA ELCA ELCA 2-2x8 TRIMMERS \ 3159-E 3159-E �3159-E 3153-E 3159-E V V L 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLATEV V� \� V 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLATE _ v -2x8 v v x8 =v I -I6" LVL CO - o co 3" 3" __ 3" PSL COL" O URINAL 9'-I I/8"-_ CLCs j 2-2x8 FULL a _--------------MECN 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = 2-2x8 TRIMMERS �r SPACE j BY SUPPLIER 42" VANITY I = 24" FLR TRS V-1 1/8" CLGI - 4 ' - FIRE BY BANSUPPLIER '-0 il N j 0 - = `' RATED 4 TILE -- -- - -- -- -- - _ - FLP_ G.T. _ - - 30x80xw i I i / I XFD. I - 7 I I I i 24" FLOOR TRUSSES I 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = 24" FLOOR TRUSSES = j BY SUPPLIER BY SUPPLIER = BY SUPPLIER = i � I al 9'-6 3/8" CLG= 9'-I 1/8" CLG S _ - P,4RTY ROOM 45'-0" x 39'-0" _ `n 23'-6" x 21'-0" CONC._ M CRPT = j ! coo I - i I 1 ! Q 21 1 I - 24" FLOOR TRUSSES / 38(FD BY SUPPLIER MND ' 4 �-z! = I 0 1 I KITCHENETTE N N = I r------------------------------------------------ N__� _ 5'-4 3/4" 13'-4" %Q1 5'4" 1Ai 4'-10" FLR Cx.T. I - I 2x6 BRCS. 6 5'-5 1/2" I I = I DN 0 24" FLOOR TRUSSES =- BY SUPPLIER = 22R �t _ 41 I LIN 5-I/4"x1" 30x80 12-2x8 FULL < = 2-2x8 FULL < I 30x80 - PSL COL. I HALF 2-2x8 TRIMMERS = 2-2x8 TRIMMERS HALF - i -LITE 3-I6" LVL = _[ 11 -LITE 2x8 w/ 2x10 SILL PLA E 2-2x10 160x80IO.H.DOO = 2-2x10 _ 2x8 w/ 2x10 I R = 2x8 w/ 2x10 STEP = I SILL PLATE I = SILL PLATE _ ---------------------------------------- -------- 1 ._._._._._._ ._._._._._._.-. .__._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ - ....... 5'-0" 40'-9 I/4" TC UPR 21'-11 1/2" 13'-0 1/2" - 10-9 1/4" 2-3 1/4" 3'-3 3/4" 5'-1 3/4" 45'-9 1/4" = 5'-1" 16-1 3/4" _ 10'-0" 1 2 B6 B6 5ARN MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4".1'-0" SEE SHEET B(o FOR ENGINEERING NOTATIONS 01 NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LAR50N ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS v 1-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF 0 FOUNDATION WHERE EXT. FND. INSUL. IS APPLIED, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. Ism v Cq NOTE - OFFSET EXTERIOR STUDS 3-1/2" TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE NOTED. MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOW CODES (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) MARVIN 'WINDOW OPENING CONTROL pEVICE' FOR FALL PREVENTION AS REQ'p. NOTE - ALL WINDOW E DOOR HEAD HGTS. TO BE SET AT 8'-0" AT MAIN LEVEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 16'-4_1/2"* TO CORNER — — — — — — — PFR SURVEY — — Ly �ul> old Lu a� r SQUARE FOOTAGE LOFT - 2125* PARTY ROOM - 980 MAIN STORAGE - 1820* LOWER STORAGE - 936* LOWER STALLS - 1191* TOTAL (FIN.) - 8252* SQUARE FOOTAGE HOUSE F.P. - 5036 101 BARN F.P. - 30091 POOL- 800* SHED - TBD* EX HOUSE - 2255* tOTAL (FIN.) - 11100 i 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu c(i m lu N F fj Q N lu N � J � d) Z3 � O n� iJ- U 'Q � W p- -1 Q Z z m� Q W W 1L Lu U z Lu Q Cn VI L O Z L O � z Lu r 3 OL Lu V! 4 COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. 1 B6 23'-0" = 23'-0" Q. i 5AFN UFFER LEVEL FLAN SCALE: 1/411011-011 SEE SWEET 56 FOR ENGINEERING NOTATIONS no (I �ILu �.> °I ILu NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LARSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOW CODES (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) MARVIN 'WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICE' FOR FALL PREVENTION AS REO'D. NOTE - ALL WINDOW E DOOR HEAD HGTS. TO BE SET AT 8'-0" AT UPR LEVEL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1] I6'-4 I/2"± TO CO@NFP SQUARE FOOTAGE LOFT - 21254 PARTY ROOM - 980* MAIN STORAGE - 1820* LOWER STORAGE - 936* LOWER STALLS - I191* TOTAL (FIN.) - 8252* SQUARE FOOTAGE HOUSE F.P. - 5036 BARN F.P. - 3009* POOL- 800* SHED - TBD* EX HOUSE - 2255* TOTAL (FIN.) - 11100* i 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 lu m lu N F fj Q N lu Lu N � O Z 0- N jW W 0 - Lu z m� Q W YW(y- Lu 1L Lu U z Lu Lu (y ZLo O z L r 3 OL Lu t� Lu 0 PARTY ROOM TOP OF SUBFLR 10555' SECTION SCALE: 1/4" ■ 1' -0" COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. PLAN KEYNOTES NOTE - ENGINEERING PERFORMED BY LAR50N ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. NOTE - DETAILS ARE FOR DESIGN INTENT. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW PROPER BUILDING PRACTICES, FLASHING, # MANUR INSTALLATION. OEXTERIOR WALL WITH 2X6 STUDS SPACED AT 16" O.C. WITH 1/2" SHEATHING PANELS ATTACHED TO FRAMING WITH 8D NAILS SPACED AT 6" O.C. ALONG ALL PANEL EDGES AND 12" O.C. AT THE INTERMEDIATE STUDS. OINTERIOR WALL: 2X4 OR 2X6 STUDS SPACED AT 16" O.C. WITH'/" MINIMUM GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING PANELS AT BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL ATTACHED TO FRAMING WITH 5D COOLER OR WALLBOARD NAILS OR SM WALLBOARD SCREWS AT 7" O.C. ALONG ALL PANEL EDGES. OEXTERIOR WALL WITH 2X6 STUDS SPACED AT 16" O.C. WITH 1/2" SHEATHING PANELS ATTACHED TO FRAMING WITH 8D NAILS SPACED AT 4" O.C. ALONG ALL PANEL EDGES AND 8" O.C. AT THE INTERMEDIATE STUDS. ®FLOOR TRUSSES SPACED AT 19.2" O.C. (MAXIMUM) WITH 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD SHEATHING ATTACHED WITH 8D NAILS SPACED AT 6" O.C. ALONG ALL PANEL EDGES AND 12" O.C. AT THE INTERMEDIATE FRAMING MEMBERS. OROOF TRUSSES SPACED AT 24" O.C. (MAXIMUM) WITH 1/2" SHEATHING ATTACHED WITH 8D NAILS SPACED AT 6" O.C. ALONG ALL PANEL EDGES AND 12" O.C. AT THE INTERMEDIATE FRAMING MEMBERS. TIE TRUSSES TO BEARING WALL WITH A SIMPSON H3 TIE (OR EQUAL). ©SIMPSON STHD14RJ STRAP -TIE HOLDOWN EMBEDDED INTO THE CONCRETE WALL AND NAILED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE STUDS AND FLOOR TRUSS. OSIMPSON STHD14 STRAP -TIE HOLDOWN EMBEDDED INTO THE CONCRETE WALL AND NAILED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL STUDS. ®SIMPSON MSTC40 WALL STRAP NAILED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL STUDS ABOVE AND BELOW THE FLOOR TRUSS. OPRECAST CONCRETE PLANK PINNED TO THE SUPPORTING CONCRETE WALLS PER SUPPLIER AND GROUT JOINTS. Q 0 PARTY ROOM TOP OF SUBFLR 10555' CONCRETE WALL SCHEDULE (BARN): USE 4,000 PSI CONCRETE AND GRADE 60 REINFORCING STEEL WALL -B1 BASEMENT WALL - 12" CONCRETE WALL WITH 4" INTERIOR BEARING LEDGE AND 8" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT 2'-8" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-0" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. WALL -2 BASEMENT WALL - 14" CONCRETE WALL UP TO 4" EXTERIOR STONE/INSUL. LEDGE THEN 10" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT T-0" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-0" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. WALL -3 BASEMENT WALL - 14" CONCRETE WALL UP TO 4" EXTERIOR STONE/INSUL. LEDGE THEN 10" WALL UP TO 4" PRECAST BEARING LEDGE AND 6" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT T-6" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-0" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. REINFORCE THE CURB WITH #4 VERTICAL BARS AT 4'-0" O.C. WITH 1 - 94 HORIZONTAL BAR AT THE TOP. WALL -4 BASEMENT WALL AT STAIRS - 12" CONCRETE WALL REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT 2'-8" O.C. AND #5 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 16" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. WALL -5 BASEMENT WALL - 12" CONCRETE WALL WITH 4" PRECAST BEARING LEDGE AND 8" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT 2'-8" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-0" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. WALL -6 BASEMENT WALL - 12" CONCRETE WALL UP TO 4" EXTERIOR STONE/INSUL. LEDGE THEN 8" WALL UP TO 4" PRECAST BEARING LEDGE AND 4" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #6 VERTICAL BARS AT 3'-6" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-0" O.C., RUNNING CONTINUOUS, AT THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. REINFORCE THE CURB WITH #4 VERTICAL BARS AT 2'-8" O.C. WITH 1 - #4 HORIZONTAL BAR AT THE TOP. WALL -7 WALKOUT WALL - 12" CONCRETE WALL WITH 2" INTERIOR SLAB LEDGE, 4" INTERIOR SLAB LEDGE AND 6" CURB AT THE TOP, REINFORCED WITH #5 VERTICAL BARS AT 3'-4" O.C. AND #4 HORIZONTAL BARS AT 2'-O"O.C.,-RUNNING CONTINUOUS, CENTERED IN THE WALL. WALL -8 INTERIOR CURB WALL - 6" CONCRETE CURB (OR CMU), VERIFY HEIGHT. PIN TO FOOTING WITH #4 DOWEL AT 3'-0" O.C. FOOTING SCHEDULE (BARN): USE 5,000 PSI CONCRETE AND GRADE 60 REINFORCING STEEL WF -1 10" X 1'-4" WALL FOOTING REINFORCED WITH 2 - #4 CONT. WF -2 10" X 1'-8" WALL FOOTING REINFORCED WITH 2 - #4 CONT. WF -3 12" X 2'-0" WALL FOOTING REINFORCED WITH 2 - #5 CONT. WF -4 12" X 2'-8" WALL FOOTING REINFORCED WITH 3 - #5 CONT. 2 SECTION SCALE: 1/4" ■ 1' -0" GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ALL W RIOR DIMENSIONS TAKEN FROM OUTSIDE OF STUD. EXTERIOR STUD OFFSET FROM FOUNDATION 1-1/2" OF FACE OF FOUNDATION WHERE EXTERIOR FOUNDATION INSULATION IS APPLIED, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS 4 CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS 4 CONNECTIONS TO BE ENGINEERED BY SUPPLIER ALL WOW HEADERS TO BE 2-2x10 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL WOOD ABUTTING CONCRETE TO BE TREATED. VERIFY ANGLES WITH FLOORPLANS (45' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED-) CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE PERFORMED TO CURRENT STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING 4 ENERGY CODES AND TO LOCAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS 4 STANDARD INDUSTRY PRACTICES. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES INSTALLATION REQWREMENTS ALL STUCCO SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MINNESOTA LATH AND PLASTER BUREAU GUIDELINES. ALL WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER IRC SEC. 8103.2 AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA RULES SECTION 13OW103. OOF CONSTRUCTION: ROOF VENTS AS REQ'D. - 1/300. ASPHALT SHINGLES METAL ROOF - PER MAR F. NSTALL REQUIFelENTS. FELT PAPER w/ ICE 4 WATER SHIELD. FULL ICE 4 WATER a ROOFS UNDER 4:12 5/8" 065 ROOF SHEATHING. WOOD TRUSSES a 24" OZ. - ENGINEERED BY SUPPLIER BAFFLE a EACH TRUSS SPACE. R-49 BLOWN -N INSULATION. POLY VAPOR BARRIER - 6 MIL. 5/8" GYP. 5D. CEILING. SOFFIT/FASCIA CONSTRUCTION: HARDIE SOFFIT w/ CONT. VENTS. 5/4" x 10" HARDIE FASCIA BD 5/4" x 3" HARDIE TRIM BD WALL CONSTRUCTION: SIDING PER ELEVATIONS. 2 LAYERS GRADE "D" BUILDING PAPER 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING. 2x6 STUDS a 16" OL. 3" SPRAY "U" FOAM INSUL 4 SEALER - R-20 MIN OR FI5ER GLASS BATTS. CONTINUOUS POLY VAPOR BARRIER - 6 MIL. - SEAL ALL SEAMS 4 PENETRATIONS 1/2" GYP. 50. - TAPED, SANDED, PAINTED FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: FINISHED FLOOR 3/4" T. 4 a PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR FLOOR TRUSSES (PER PLAN) a 16" OZ. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPRAYED U -FOAM INSUL. a RIM R-21. 5/8" GYP. 50. a FINISHED AREAS. FOUNDATION: 1/2" x 14" ANCHOR BOLTS a D'O.C. 2x6 LSL TREATED SILL 4 SEALER 8" W POURED CONC. WALLS MIN. - (SEE DETAILS 4 PLANS) R-15 INSUL W/ R-10 MIN a EXTERIOR 4 SEALER OR EQUAL 20" x 24" CONIC. FTG. (SEE DETAILS 4 PLANS) WATCHDOG WATERPROOFING OR EQUAL 6" GONG. SLAB 2" RIGID INSULATION POLY VAPOR BARRIER INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR DRAIN TILE TO SUMP BUCKET 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 LLI 01 - Q O 4 N Lu N LLJ N d) N � � LL1 [K z 0 z Lu �o �W z_ 111 N 111 Lu U z Lu _a �n v/ Lu Y O Z z� L r 3 m OL Lu w� v! ro OF I .� &C -ALE: 1/4" ■ I' -m" COPYRIGHT 2023, ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP, INC. - ENGINEERING PERFORMED LARSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. AND INTEGRATED INTO THE PLANS. CE - DETAILS ARE FOR DESIGN =NT. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW 9PER BUILDING PRACTICES, 6HING, 4 MANOR INSTALLATION. TOP OF LOFT LEVEL SUBFLR e �Q � O PARTY ROOM TOP OF STORAGE SUBFLR LEVEL TOP 10555' OF SLAB U LJR LEVEL OF OF SLAB = 1042.0' i 275 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE 102 WAYZATA, MN 55391 Phone: 952.473.8777 FAX: 952.473.8222 LLI m � N F Q Q N LLI LUN � N N Z3 � O w Z O W �O 0 � W z Q W !Y W (L Lu U z Lu Cl p Lu ZLo Z L r n: l - Lu t� RUN DATE: 08/24/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 32-118-23 13 0007 38 32-118-23 34 0011 38 32-118-23 43 0004 STUBBS ADDN HOMEOWNERS ASCN W E SHATZER & L C SHATZER GMB REV TRUST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3685 WATERTOWN RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 00000 STUBBS HOMEOWNERS ASCN WADE E & LAURA C SHATZER GAIL M BOLLIS C/O CUSTOM STRUCTURES LTD 3685 WATERTOWN RD 220 STUBBS BAY RD 15500 WAYZATA BLVD MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 32-118-23 24 0003 38 32-118-23 34 0012 38 32-118-23 43 0014 ADAM HUNSLEY/KATHRYN HUNSLEY W T C BERGERSON & J S WEINER T A& L M SCHULENBERG 485 STUBBS BAY RD N 3745 WATERTOWN RD 3520 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 ADAM HUNSLEY/KATHRYN HUNSLEY W THOMAS C BERGERSON THOMAS A SCHULENBERG II 485 STUBBS BAY RD N JILL S WEINER JENNIFER M SCHULENBERG LONG LAKE MN 55356 3745 WATERTOWN RD 3520 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 24 0013 38 32-118-23 34 0013 38 32-118-23 43 0015 KENNETH RIFE & CASEY A RIFE J F HORTON & K A HORTON E C MILLER & C K MILLER 3625 JACOBS MILL RD 3765 WATERTOWN RD 195 KINTYRE LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 KENNETH RIFE & CASEY A RIFE JAMES F HORTON ERIC C MILLER 3625 JACOBS MILL RD KIMBERLY A HORTON CHERYL K MILLER LONG LAKE MN 55356 3765 WATERTOWN RD 195 KINTYRE LA MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 310005 38 32-118-23 34 0014 38 32-118-23 43 0016 REVIS L STEPHENSON III DONALD BRUCE MALBY LIV TRUST M ROLL & J WILLIAM-ROLL 3760 WATERTOWN RD 75 STUBBS BAY RD N 155 KINTYRE LA ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 REVIS L STEPHENSON III BRUCE MALBY MICHAEL ROLL 1850 FOXRIDGE RD 75 STUBBS BAY RD N JACQUELINE WILLIAMS-ROLL LONG LAKE MN 55356 MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 155 KINTYRE LANE ORONO MN 55356 38 32-118-23 310006 38 32-118-23 42 0001 38 32-118-23 43 0017 F R KRIEGER & J L KRIEGER RICHARD N STUBBS TRUSTEE JOHN L BABITT JR 355 STUBBS BAY RD N 400 STUBBS BAY RD N 125 KINTYRE LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 FREDRICK RICHARD KRIEGER RICHARD N STUBBS JOHN L BABITT JR 355 STUBBS BAY RD N 400 STUBBS BAY RD N 125 KINTYRE LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 32 0005 38 32-118-23 42 0005 38 32-118-23 43 0025 M ANDERSON & K D ANDERSON E A KRISIK & J J KRISIK R E& S J ROBERTSON REV TR 3850 WATERTOWN RD 300 STUBBS BAY RD N 3565 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK ANDERSON ESTEE ANN KRISIK SANDRA & ROBERT ROBERTSON KRISTEN D ANDERSON JAKE JOSEPH KRISIK 3535 WATERTOWN RD 3850 WATERTOWN RD 300 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 33 0002 38 32-118-23 42 0006 38 32-118-23 43 0026 JAMES F BROOKS RYAN M BLUM/ASHLEY C WENDEL R E & S J ROBERTSON REV TR 3785 WATERTOWN RD 350 STUBBS BAY RD N 3535 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JAMES F BROOKS RYAN MICHAEL BLUM SANDRA & ROBERT ROBERTSON 3785 WATERTOWN ROAD ASHLEY CHRISTINE WENDEL 3535 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 350 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 33 0004 38 32-118-23 42 0007 T H KING & M W KING R M BLUM/A C WENDEL ET AL 3855 WATERTOWN RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 00000 TODD & MICHELLE KING RYAN MICHAEL BLUM 3855 WATERTOWN RD ASHLEY CHRISTINE WENDEL MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 350 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 34 0004 38 32-118-23 42 0009 GARRETT & ANDREA M GRONBERG C J& G M BOLLIS 65 STUBBS BAY RD N 220 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 ANDREA MARIE GRONBERG CHRISTOPHER J BOLLIS GARRETT GRONBERG GAIL M BOLLIS 65 STUBBS BAY RD N 220 STUBBS BAY RD N MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 34 0005 38 32-118-23 43 0003 DENNIS & DEBORAH KRUMP TRUST N BAUDOIN & K CARLSON 25 STUBBS BAY RD N 3580 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55359 ORONO MN 55356 DENNIS M KRUMP NICHOLAS BAUDOIN DEBORAH L KRUMP KARLA CARLSON 25 STUBBS BAY RD N 3580 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 8/24/2023 Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3760 Watertown Rd This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Natalie Nye From: Rick Krieger <rkrieger76@outlook.com> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2023 8:13 PM To: Natalie Nye Subject: Stephenson variance Attachments: Permit Survey Proposed 2023.08.24.pdf Natalie, I am the home owner adjacent to Revis Stephenson property to the north and along Stubbs Bay Rd. I have reviewed the site map (attached) and the variance and support the approval of the variance. Please add that to the file for the meeting, I will not be attending. Call with any questions... Thanks Rick Krieger CEO, The Stonehaven Group, Inc 355 Stubbs Bay Rd Orono, MN 55356 952-922-7555 rkrieger76@outlook.com Natalie Nye From: Bruce Malby <bmalby@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2023 6:18 PM To: Natalie Nye Subject: Re: 3760 Watertown - variance application Looks like a great home. I can certainly see someone wanting to put up a barn or car storage building on that type of improvement on these large lots west of Stubbs Bay Road. Many of these sites are 10 acres; all are pretty much two acres or more. This neighbor's is about 30 acres. It's been my experience as a fee appraiser for Newcome and Hansen Appraisals and when working for Dick Marks at Universal Valuation, that you usually see a caretaker home on sites like these and usually large barns or large carriage homes. One of the first home appraisals I worked on in 1993 when coming to Minnesota was owned by I believe a guy named Brackett who owned a 8,000 sf home built at the turn of the century on Crystal Bay. He had a caretaker home on the property, which I believe was about 10 acres, and about 3,000 linear feet of shoreline on Crystal Bay. He wanted our opinion of value regarding a property tax appeal. The main home was exceptional quality as much of the inside was hand carved and very high quality woodwork, but the home was in poor condition. It even had an underground tunnel to Crystal Bay and their dock, but also had original knob and tube wiring, and an 8 bay carriage garage back when they had horses. At the time, the home had reached the end of its economic life. But even then, over 100 years ago, you would see a caretakers home on the site. Same thing is true today at the Carlson compound on Tonkawa, and several other homes in the area For what it's worth, I wholeheartedly support whatever they do with their property and wish them well. In a message dated 9/15/2023 1:12:34 PM Central Daylight Time, nnye@oronomn.gov writes: Hi Bruce, Please see the attached site plan for the proposed variance request at 3760 Watertown Road. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Natalie Natalie Nye Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4626 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 www.oronomn.gov