Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-21-1988 Planning MinutesimnJTBS OP TUB PLUnmiG CCBMISSIOB NBBTIIIG SBLO miiCB 21, 19BS ATTBBDAHCB 7:02 P.N. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley# Johnson# Bellows# and Brown. Hanson and Cohen were absent. The following represented the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth# Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron# Building Official Jacobs# and City Recorder Peterson. Counci1members Callahan# Peterson# and Goetten were also present. *1257 CATHBRIBB A. CRAM 3700 WATMTOW ROAD PRBLHIIRART 8UBDIVISI0H POBUC HRAR1B6 7:15-7:23 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Gordon Coffin# of Coffin t Gronberg Engineers and Land Surveyors# was present representing Ms. Cram. Mr. Coffin explained the request for preliminary subdivision approval of a 72 acre homestead into 3 lots. Lot 1# Block 1 contains 22.27 acres with an existing barn and shed (no principal structure). Lot 2# Block 1 contains 30.1 acres with two residences. Lot 1# Block 2 contains 18.6 acres %ith no structures. Regarding the two residences on Lot 2# applicant at this time does not wish to divide off the rental house. Staff recommends that this issue be addressed if Lot 2 is further subdivided. Additionally# if Lot 1# Block 1 has not been sold within one year# staff recommends that applicant legally combine Lot 1, Block 1 with Lot 2# Block 1; or remove the barns. If the new owner has not filed a building permit application for a new residence on Lot 1# Block 1 within one year of final plat approval date# the accessory structures would have to be removed. Mr. Coffin stated that Mrs. Cram is out of town and has not been advised of staff's recommendation and he could not comment on her behalf. Mabusth stated that Mrs. Cram is anxious to release the property for sale (Lot 1, Block 1) and would like Planning Commission to act on the application at this time. She noted that if applicant was not agreeable to staff's recommendation regarding the accessory structures# the application would be brought back to the Planning Commission in April. NXIIITBS OF TBE FUUIHI«6 COMOSSIOH MBBTIBG HBLD lABCB 21. 1988 91257 CRAH COHTIVDBD Bellows was concerned with the two residences on Lot 2 and recommended a lot line rearrangement at this time. Johnson stated he was not concerned with the 2 residences at this time because Lot 2 could reasonably be subdivided to meet the 5 ^cre minimum standard. Mabusth asked if Planning Commission was comfortable with st .ff*s recomsiended controls for the non-conforming structures? Johnson, Brown, and Chairman Kelley stated it was acceptable to them. There were no cosiments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Brown, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision as presented per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1251 AUDREY 8CBULT1 PRITICNI TO VACATE P08TI0HS OF FOBBST BOULEVARD SAGA BILL REVISED (SOOTHEAST SBORELIEE OF FOREST LAD) POBLIC BEARIBG 7:54-8:12 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Audrey Schultz was present for this matter. Mabusth explained the request for a partial vacation of the remaining portion of Vine Place and a park area of the Saga Hill Revised plat, and portions of Forest Boulevard, which involves 9 properties. Chairman Kelley asked why all the homeowners were not involved in the application? Audrey Schultz was present for this matter and stated that some of the homeowners did not want it, basically for the expense reasons. She stated she sent out notices to a specific section of homeowners and included the names of those Lhat responded in this application. John Perkins, 1265 Elmwcod, stated they are in favor of the vacation but do not want tht expense involved. Mabusth stated chat costs would be incurred by the owners to pay ti.® costs of land use application fee, filing fee, and legal description. HVDTBS QP ns PLBJnilBG CQMUSSIOH MBRISG HELD MUtCl H, 1911 •1251 scniLn coninD Nabusth noted that before a total vacation could be granted, access to the Nelson property (1310 Elmwood) would have to be resolved. She explained that in 1972, the City vacated Oak Place. Mr. Nelson currently achieves access to his property via the vacated Oak Place now owned by three other property owners. If a total vacation of Forest Blvd. were to be granted. Nr. Nelson's property would be legally landlocked. One of the four fee owners of vacated Oak Place, RichardI Johnson of 1304 Elmwood, stated he had no problem with granting an easement to Mr. Nelson, but was unsure of the process involved. Staff recoBunended tabling the application to work with all the property owners toward a total vacation of Forest Blvd. and to resolve the Nelson access issue. Audrey Schults, acting agent for Douglas and Tricla Johnson, 1399 Park Drive, stated they could not construct an addition to their home until Forest Blvd. is vacated. She has been working on this vacation request since November 1987 and was opposed to tabling the request and delaying her client further, and in consideration that the other property owners were already given the opportunity to join in the application. Mabusth stated that the request would have to be tabled if other property owners wished to join in the vacation request at this point, in order to review the impact on the adjoining properties, and determine the need for survey information, additional fees, and another legal publication. Tricia Johnson, 1399 Park Drive, was opposed to tabling the request for a partial vacation, particularly due to the fact that the other property owners do not want to deal with a survey, noting again that they have been working on this since November and are anxious to make improvements to their home. Bellows and Johnson had no problem with recosunendinq approval of the proposed partial vacation. Kelly Sevan, 1295 Elmwood, asked if a total vacation would include the portion of Forest Blvd. at Summit Avenue? I Mabusth stated that the Summit Avenue and Buff St. portions would not be included and must remain public for fire lane purposes. MIMITBS OP TBB PLIWIIIO OCMMl^IOT tOEBTliG I I .^#1 Httci 31. ini •1251 8CH0LTS COaTIMOBD There were no other comaients froai the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to recoBBsend approval of the partial vacation as proposed! per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Rays 0. •125« mnOPOLlTAR MASTS COMTSOL COMNlSSKSi comm 51 AMD 19 ISTBSSSCnOM COMDITIOSAL USB PBRNIT AMD VABTABCBS PUBLIC BBARIMG 8s30-ts4€ The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. t * Mabusth explained the request for a conditional use permit and variances for the encroachment of the 75* lakeshore protected area, the upgrading of existing lift stations, and installation of two lift stations within the City of Orono. Kimberly Eckhardt of thr MHCC was present for this matter. She explained that the capacities of the existing interceptor line and the lift stations have been reached. To solve the capacity problem they are putting in a parallel system, vacating the existing system, upgrading some of the lift stations, abandoning two lift stations, and putting in some larger lift stations. Chairman Kelley asked how a lift station and the existing pipe being replaced will be abandoned? Ms. Eckhardt stated that they will remove the above ground structures and the lift station is filled with sand; the pipe will not be removed but will be plugged in some areas. She noted that they may attempt to remove the portion of pipe hanging from the bridge. Kent Carlson, 3498 North Shore Drive, explained the history of the lift station located on the corner of Baldur Park and Birch Lane. He felt the problems are directly related to private downspouts and sump pumps discharging to the sewer, and that the City should make an attempt to resolve this abuse before undergoing this expensive project. .M i»ms OF mas puniiaG coMassioa iTiac MMtai 21, 19ts •X2$« ■iSm: COWTIITOED Jasies Olson of Bonestroo, Rosene, « Aderlik Assoc., th« engineering consultants to the MWCC for this project, stated that Mr. Carlson's comnents were accurate as to why this project is needed, however, evaluation of attesq>ts by other Municipalities locally and nationally to reduce problesi flows indicates that they cannot be effectively reduced, therefore the proposed project is necessary. Mr. Carlson reccommended that the City of Orono look into what Haysata and Long Lake has acconplished in reducing problem flows before proceeding with the project because of the extensive amount of money involved. Ms. Eckhardt noted that the MWCC presently has 2.4 million dollars to put toward this project. Bellows asked if any other solutions to solving the peak water problem without rebuilding the system been investigated? Mr. Olson stated that the project investigation started back in 1979 and the proposed project was found to be the most cost effective. It was noted that there was a public hearing regarding this project held on March 7, 1988. Ms. Eckhardt explained the process of notification regarding this hearing noting that approximately 30 people were in attendance. Chairman Kelley read in the record a letter from Kent Carlson, 3498 North Shore Drive, voicing opposition to disturbance to his property during this project. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance application of the MWCC, finding that all standards have been satisfied and such approval to include any amendment to any of the plans for each specific lift station , subject to staff reviewing the erosion control plans prior to Council review. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MiaDTBS or THE PLMDilHG COMMISSIOH MBSTIHG HELD 21, 19|I «125€ Mice COHTIHDBD Mr. Carlson noted that he objected to the basis of the sewer per se and as a property owner he is not satisfied that an alternative Mthod to drainwater being passed into the sanitary sewer has been answered properly which is unfair to the residents of Orono. Chairman Kelley stressed the importance of adhering the the minimum 2*5 acre lot standards in order to minimize the need for sanitary sewer around the lake. #1218 ESTHTB OF ROTH SMITH 387 (ffiOMO ORCHARD ROAD SUBDIVI8I0H THIRD RBVIBM This application was tabled per applicant's request. #1223 JOHB MALDROM 1951 COHCORDIA STREET COHDITIOMAL OSE PERMIT A TARIAECB REFERRAL FROM COOHCIL FC« REVIBH OF REVISED PROPOSAL John Waldron was present for this matter. Gaffron explained the revised proposal for grading, which would cut approximately half of the lakeshore yard down to a depth of 3' below the existing surface. He also reviewed the options to restore the lakeshore bank. Staff finds that from both the short and long-term lake water quality standpoints, there would be no significant impact relative to other options. From a stability standpoint, some options are better than others. From a visual standpoint, the revised proposal will have less of an impact than the original deep walk-out cut proposal. Bellows felt that because of the existing grade, a 3* cut would create more drainage into the lake. She suggested another relatively inexpensive stabilization option that is similar to the cribbing system using posts and concrete footings, and then completed with plantings. Chairman Kelley felt that the 3' cut would cause other problems, however, if the cut was allowed, it should be done along the entire width of the property. He was more in favor of stabilizing the bank by other means. Bellows stated that she too was in favor of stabilizing the bank properly without the need for the 3' cut. MiaOTB OP THE PtAlHiaG COMNISSlQll MBRllG IBLP HAICH 21» 19t8 *1223 iiELmov coanaoED Mr. Waldron did not feal that his proposal vould create any adverse drainage problems to the adjacent properties. He stated that the logical method to solving the bank erosion problem is to remove the overburdening soil which is supported by the HCO and his engineer. He stated that his plan is basically neutral in relation to other options except for the visual impact. Bellows explained that the visual impact issue is not whether they like or dislike this specific proposal, but to maintain a visual coherenci' to the lakeshore. She noted that restoring the lakeshore bank can be done without creating any visual impact. Johnson asked about the material that washed down from the lakeshore bank, were there any plans to reclaim these soils, or just cut the 3* from the top? Mr. Waldron stated that the soils slid into the lake approximately 20’ and settled or washed away during the summer. He did not plan to reclaim these soils. Johnson, Bellows, and Kelley stated they could not support the revised plan. Brown stated he felt OK with the revised proposal taking into consideration the Hennepin Conservation District report, the fact that the visual impact is minimal, the neutral long-term runoff impact. He would agree that the cut should be made along the entire width of the property. Chairman Kelley noted the proposed hardcover increase. Gaffron explained the proposed 1.41% hardcover increase in the 0-75'. Chairman Kelley stated he did not have any problem with the proposed deck but felt the hardcover percentage should remain the same. Mr. Waldron noted way that he could achieve no net hardcover increase and agreed he would do this. Because of the Planning Commission majority opposed to the revised plan, Kelley asked Mr. Waldron if he would like his request tabled so he can submit another revised plan? MlMmS OP THE PIAHMlHe C0NH1SS10«ITIK I mRCB 21 r 19S8 11223 fOOittOH COHTIHDSD Mr. Waldron felt there were no other proposals that would work for then, therefore requested Planning Comnission to nake their reconmendation at this tine. It was noved by Chairnan Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recomnend denial of the 3' excavation cut in the lakeshore yard and 0-75* hardcover variance; and recomnend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to construct the deck as proposed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Brown voted nay. Motion carried. #1233 NICHABL HALLBT BOMBS INC. 2715 PBMCB LAMB OOMOITIOBAL 08B PBBNIT ABD PARIABCB ANBBDBD APPLICATIOB - SBCOMD BBVIBH Architect Larry Kollmeyer was present representing Michael Halley Homes for this matter. Jacobs explained the request for a conditional use permit and variance to reconstruct an existing retaining wall within 75' of the lake; and install a drainage pipe within 75’ of the lake. Chairman Kelley read the City Engineer's recommendation of this proposal. It was noted that the proposal includes constructing a walkout basement with a berm between the home and the lake. Bellows felt that they were being asked to solve a problem (through a variance to the ordinance) that is being created by the proposed design. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Kollmeyer what the hardship was to support granting the variance and conditional use permit for the drainage pipe? Mr. Kollmeyer did not indicate any specific hardship, but questioned why a drainage pipe buried below the surface of the yard would be a problem? Bellows explained that an outlet pipe to the lake is not in the spirit of Orono's protection of disturbing the lakeshore and water quality. She further explained that the proposal is creating an unatural drainage situation, a solution affecting the 0-75' lakeshore yard being created by the desire for a walkout basement. Mr. Kollmeyer felt a 6-10" pipe would have an minimal physical effect to the lakeshore. 8 MIHUTBS OP THE PUJOIIK CONHISSIOII iU >• VllG I I -«F#MKiai 21, 198t #1233 MIOAEL HALLBT BOMBS COMTII Chairnan Kelley stated he is in favor of restoring the retaining walls but opposed to allowing the drainage pipe. Johnson agreed that the pipe would not have significant impact and would support the proposal. a Brown agreed with Kelley finding it would be setting a precedent by allowing a drainage pipe. It was moved by Chairman Kelley* seconded by Bellows* to recommend denial of the CUP/variance for the drainage pipe within the 75* lakeshore; and recosaiend approval of the CUP/variance to reconstruct the retaining walls within the 75* lakeshore subject to no additional hardcover incurred by retaining walls. Johnson felt that the revised plan was a couch better plan than originally submitted. He suggested that applicant could direct the drainage to the rear of the house instead of directly to the lake. Mabusth agreed suggesting the wetland area. Mr. Kollmeyer stated that the wetland is outside of the property. Chairman Kelley stated he did not feel this was a good design for the property because eventually grading of the the lakeshore bank would be desired. Motion* Ayes 3* Nays 1. Johnson voted nay. Motion carried. #1247 ROBERT POSTHOMOS RECORD LOT HO. 40 - BIG ISLAHD VARIAHCE SBCan) REVIEW Applicant was not present for this matter. Jacobs explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a lake home; and a variance and conditional use permit to install a well within 75* of the lakeshore. It was noted that the restricted septic site affects the well and house location* therefore requiring the need for the variances and conditional use permit. The hardships being the lot size and septic location. MMons or m plmwiig connxssxoi wmertm MUKai 21» IMi 11247 POSTHl IS COMTIMIB) Gaffron explained that there are many record lots on Big Island that were granted the right to use the property for seasonal use* many of which are substandard and required variances. There were no comments from the public. It was moved by Chairman Kelley« seconded by Johnson, to recoiranend approval as proposed per staff's findings and conditions. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. fi24s TBoms mxxzjMs 4127 OAE STBKR VABIJUKBS POBUC BKASIMS t:51-8:57 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Nailing were noted. Thomas Williams was present for this matter Mabusth explained the request for a lot area and lot width variance for an undeveloped 3 lot parcel. Staff finds no problem with the building envelope as indicated on the plan. Chairman Kelley stated he would like to see Lots 1 4 2» Block 5 combined with Lot 1, Block 4, including the vacation of Ridge Place between the lots. Charles Hommeyer, 4125 Oak Street, was opposed to vacating Ridge Place because it would eliminate the need to adhere to the 35* road setback requirement, and allow a larger building envelope for that lot. Mabusth noted that because of the existence of the sewer pipes, she did not feel the City would consider vacating Ridge Place. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the lot area and lot width variances per staff recommendation, subject to the condition that the building envelope as described on the plan being maintained. Mr. Hommeyer asked about the status of upgrading Oak Street because of the addition of a fourth residence to be served by this private road. imniTBS OF m ptAMiae ooNassiaii flK il MOtCB 21, list §1248 WILLUMS CMTIHOBD Mabusth stated it is the City's position that the road will not be required to be improved unless all four property owners request the improvement. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay because she does not believe in approving substandard lot sises andl in this case because of the unresolved difficult road situation. Motion carried. 84 t4, I •§1249 DANIEL W. 2780 8BADTMOOD MOAD VAUAMCB PUBLIC BBABIBG This application was formally withdrawn. §1250 DABA N. HELLS 1397 OROBO LABB VABIABCB PUBLIC BBABIBG 7t09>7zll The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing i were noted. | Applicant arrived later in the meeting. Mabusth explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a garage addition which will not encroach any closer than the existing house. There is no increase in hardcover because the garage addition will be constructed over existing gravel drive. She noted that the proposed structure will have no negative impact the most affected adjacent property. There were no comments from the pub!ic regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Brown, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MIHUTBS OP TUB PLMniSG COMMISSIOH !TIK .1 -1^1 MBSCH 21* 19ii tl253 B. J(WB LIBDAHL JS. 1406 Boms POIBT ROBD VBRIABCB PUBLIC HBBRIBG 9:01-9:06 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. B. John Lindahl Jr. was present for this laatter. Mabusth explained the proposal to remove an existing accessory shed and detached garage and replace them with a single detached garage with an attic area providing much needed storage. Staff recommends approval cf the proposal finding many valid hardships present. There were no conuaents from the public regarding thiw Blatter and the public hearing was closed. Mr. reo all ill I Lindahl commented on the following two staff endations : 1. Regarding deeding the travelled portion of Bohns Point Road that Intersects the subject property to the City of Orono* they would be willing to grant an easement to the City if they want it. Mabusth stated that an easement would be acceptable to the City. 2. Regarding no plumbing being allowed* he is requesting to allow the structure to be plumbed for cold water for the kennel and potting area use. Mabusth stated that staff finds no problem subject to the resolution clearly stating that the accessory structure can never be used as a second residence. It was moved by Bellows* seconded by Kelley* to recommend approval per staff recommendation with the exception of amending the following points: 3. Granting an easement of the travelled portion of Bohns Point Road that intersects the subject property to the City of Orono. 4. The structure shall be allowed to be plumbed for cold water and no residential unit use to be allowed. Motion* Ayes 4* Nays 0. 3!^ laHUTBS OF THE FLMnilMG CXMMISSIOH !TIW3 HELD MMtCH 21, 1988 *1254 TRiaiTT LDTHBRAH CHUHCH 2060 SIXTH AVBHUB HORTH ccHn>iTi(HttL OSS pbhmitaariahcbs PUBLIC HBARIHG 9:07-9:31 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Present for this matter were: John Lundquist, isunediate past President of the Congregation, and Craig Mole«^hi of Trinity Lutheran Church and Dick Brownlee, architect for this project. Jacobs explained the proposed commercial site plan and request for conditional use permit for the existing non- conforming use and setback variance for the proposed parking lot expansion. Regarding the requirement of installing sprinkler system in the church, Jacobs stated that a variance cannot be granted to this requirement because it is a State Building Code requirment which the City has adopted. Mr. Lundquist stated that it was his understanding that a variance could be granted to the SBC requiresient. He felt it would be unrealistic and unfair to impose this requirement because of the lack of public water to this site. He noted that the new design will have an enhanced pedestrian travel flow within the building so that the ability to get in and out in case of an emergency will be better than currently exists. Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission could not decide on this issue, it would have to be addressed by the City's legal staff and Council. Bellows noted that no future day care use would be allowed without installing a sprinkler system. Bellows noted the issue of the existing septic system that has not been documented but is expected to be found as substandard in size and design for the proposed addition. She did not feel this plan could be approved without these facts. Mr. Lundquist noted the use of the church would not necessarily increase with this addition. Gaffron stated the septic system was a concern and staff will require soil testing and system design be submitted and approved by the City prior to issuance of any permit for the building additions. MuniTBS OF ns PiAniaG comassioa nHG HELD n&KCH 21, 1988 #1254 nillTF LOTHBIAH CBDICB COVTiainD Paul Phillips, 2140 Sixth Ave. N., asked about the impact of the parking lot lighting toward his property of the Woodland property. Craig Moleski stated that the lighting will not change from what currently exists. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Because of the weather conditions, Gaffron stated that it may be difficult to do soil testing at this time. Dick Brownlee proposed that their engineer furnish a letter to the City which states that the site has adequate area and the design of the system will be adequate when the percolation tests can be done. Staff recommended that applicant submit as much information regarding the septic system as possible prior to the first Council sieeting in April. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the Commercial Site Plan Review, conditional use permit, and variance per staff's recommended conditions and findings, subject to resolve of the septic system issue prior to review by the Council. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1258 JOn 8 KATBT BHLBRT 1785 COKORDIA STREET VARIAMCB/CCNn>ITI(»nL USB PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9s38-9:59 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Jack Anderson and Nick Ruehl of EOS Architecture Corp. were present representing the applicants. Jacobs explained the request to construct a 2-story living area addition and an addition of garage space. To construct these additions the following variances are requested: 1. Lakeshore setback - required 75', proposed 71'. 2. Side setback - required 10'- proposed 3.5'. 3. 0-75' Hardcover - allowed 0% - existing 533.4 s.f. - proposed 576.4 s.f. 4. Average lakeshore setback NmUTES OP THE PIAniHG COMMISSIOH !TIP6 HELD M&SCH 21, 1988 11258 mjSRT OOMTiaUBD A conditional use permit is also required for land alteration within the 75* lakeshore yard, and excavation and construction within the 931.5 elevation. Dave Oskey, 1761 Concordia St., stated he was not in favor of granting the variances because it would reduce the visibility of the park. He does not feel there is a hardship to support granting the variance and 10* setback should be maintained for the garage. Jack Anderson stated that the location of the garage was basically for aesthetic reasons and could be moved. Chairman Kelley did not have a problem with the hardcover but felt the neighbors request for maintaining the 10* setback should be adhered to. Johnson, Bellows, and Brown concurred with Kelley. John Waldron, 1951 Concordia St., stated he did not feel .4% hardcover Increase was significant at^ it was not significant in his previous application. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit (per grading plans submitted), hardcover and lakeshore setback variances; and recommend denial of the side setback variance. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. *1252 CHRIS HADGEH ■AVARRO PLAT - PRD COHDITIOHAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND ORIGIHIRAL PRD SKETCH PLAH This application was tabled because the applicant was not present. ADDITIONAL REQUEST fl213 ROLLIE LACT 2655 NORTH SHORE DRIVE AMENDMENT OP ORIGINAL HARDCOVER APPROVAL Mabusth explained the request for special consideration to keep the 14'x 16* shed scheduled for removal in exchange for not installing structural decking within the 75-250* setback area. This request will result in an overall reduction of .4% proposed hardcover. Planning Commission had no objections to this request. flimJtBS OP TEB P1A1IIIIIN3 COMMISSIOB MmiK HELD MARCH 21, 1988 APPROVAL OP Minims It was moved by Brown, seconded by Kelley, to approve the Minutes of the February 16, 1988 Planning Conmisslon meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PLARBIHG COMMISSIOH RRPRESBMTATIVK Brown was appointed to attend the March 28, 1988 Council meeting. Johnson was appointed to attend the April 11, 1988 Council meeting. AOJOORMMBR 10:09 P.N. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:09 P.M.