Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-18-1989 Planning MinutesMINUTES or ns PIAMHIMG O • ,1-USSIOB , I H .TIHG SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 ATTEHDAECE 7s00 P.M. The Orono Planning Conmisslon met on the above date with the following nem^ers present: Chairman Kelley; Planning Commissioners Cohen, Bellows, Hanson, Brown and Moos. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron and City Recorder Scheffler. CounciImember Goetten was also present. *1457 MAE CARLSOB 3140 BATERTNOB ROAD PRELIMIBART 80BDIVISI0B PUBLIC HEARIBG 7:00 P.M. TO 7:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this public hearing, as was Mr. Gary Peterson, Mr. Jerry Sunde, his surveyor, and Mr. Steve Schirmers, his septic consultant. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth provided a brief introduction of the proposed subdivision. Chairman Kelley observed that the "flag lot" would not meet the required lot width. Mabusth said that a lot width variance would be required for that lot and that staff was presenting two options for accessing that lot. Mr. Doug Merz, 3195 Watertown Road, asked in what direction water from the wetland flowed? Mabusth explained that the water came from the north from Claussen Lake and flows toward the south. Mabusth said that there is a large wetland that drains from the Eisinger property through a drainageway under the railroad tracks. The southern one-third of the property drains to the south and then exits at the southeast corner. Chairman Kelley noted that the applicant is proposing to install a retention pond to slow the movement of water leaving the property. Mr. Sunde said that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will require the developer to not exceed pre-development discharge. Mr. Sunde explained the applicant's proposal to control drainage. Ms. Carol Senn, owner of property to the west of Mr. Carlson, asked whether the pond would be located close to her property line. Mr. Carlson confirmed that it would be close to her property line. Mr. Sunde said that the pond could be located anywhere in MIOTTBS OP THE PLMmiHG COMMISSIOB NBBTIHG SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 ZOMIIMS FILE «1457-CARLSOH COHTIHUED that area as long as it is far enough north so that it catches the runoff. Mr. Merz asked whether due to the lower water levels now existing if the applicant's drainage plans would further slow the runoff from Claussen Creek? Mr. Sunde did not believe it would h-»ve any effect. Cuirman Kelley asked how nuch flowage there was currently? Mr. Merz said that it was fairly dry. Mrs. Senn added that in the Spring there is heavy flow coming from Claussen Creek. Mr. Scott Goldsmith, 265 Old Crystal Bay Road, said that he had a flowage and conservation easement on his property that was required by the City. Mr. Goldsmith said that water comes into his property from the north and runs west. Chairman Kelley asked how the slope of the lots would facilitate septic systems? Mr. Schirmers said that all lots would require mound systems. He said he has found areas available that are at 6% slope or less. Two lots appear to have future expansion sites within areas at 7% slope. Along the perimeter of the wetland, erosion has formed plateaus and will allow for septic systems being placed at the base of the slope. He said that all of the lots had been tested with the exception of Lot 8. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron said that there are some steep slope concerns for Lot 8 where the slopes are at 9t. He said that Lot 8 was questionable as a building site. Gaffron said that he is also concerned about the existence of only one primary and one alternate site being available for the majority of lots. He said that during the course of constructing the road, lack of extreme care by the contractor could easily result in the destruction of one site or the other, thus losing the buildability of the lot entirely. Mr. Carlson said that he would take necessary measures to assure that those sites would be protected. Planning Commissioner Bellows observed that it would be difficult to achieve access to the proposed attached garage on Lot 6, Block 1, and yet avoid the septic areas. Gaffron replied that indeed he had not yet received a detailed report for each site and it is difficult to determine any specific separation distances without that. Schirmers said that there would be some room to slide the systems around on Lot 6. He said that the slope would allow the mound to wrap around to the west. Mr. Sunde said that the lot was open and would allow for flexibility in the location of the septic system. & MIHOTBS OP THE PlAmiHG (XNfNISSKM MEBTISG SBPT 18, 1989 ZCnilHG PILE «1457-CARLSOH COHTIBUED Gaffron said that staff needs more tine to review this aspect of the application once the detailed reports are submitted. Mr. Carlson asked that approval be given conditioned upon approval being given by staff. Mr. A1 Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road, said that he was opposed to the road outlot being proposed to the east. Chairman Kelley explained the policy of the City regarding the need to plan for future roads. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the road being proposed does not have direct access to the lots. She also said that she questioned the buildability of two of the lots shown in the plat. She said that she would have difficulty giving preliminary approval of this subdivision without the septic report. Bellows also said that she objects to the creation of a flag lot. Mabusth asked the Planning Commission how they felt about the shared access being proposed for Lots 6 and 7 along the south lot line. Bellows said that there are many beautiful trees to the south which will call for the road to be placed north of the property line. This in turn will push the house lots further north into the wetland. Mr. Carlson disagreed with Bellow's opinions regarding the proposed road. He said that he had gone to great lengths to find the optimum plan for the road and there were no other options. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he had reservations about approving a road that runs through the Orono designated wetlands. He said that he may be able to approve such a configuration, but did not like the concept of the additional road beyond the end of the cul-de-sac needed to access the lot. Hanson also said that he objected to the creation of the flag lot and would have difficulty approving the subdivision without having the opportunity to review the septic testing report. Chairman Kelley said that the lot configurations bothered him. He suggested that Mr. Carlson was trying to force too many lots into this development. He said that he did not object to the road running through the designated wetland. Kelley said that he objected to the septic informtaion being incomplete and the creation of the flag lot. Mabusth asked Schirmers which lots would be considered to have the most limited location for septic sites? fUHOTBS OP nit PIAimiK COHHISSIOa VI8G SBPnMBBK 18, 1989 80SIB6 PILE fl457-CABLSOII CXWriMIlSD Mr. Schirmers pointed out specific lots on the diagram and stated that because of the severe slope and poor percolation rates some of the sites will be limited as to septic development. Chairman Kelley asked how the City protects the alternate sites from being destroyed for the purpose of constructing tennis courts and other accessory structures. Mabusth said that the City will have to warn the future property owier, not only the developer of the need to protect those site:;. Mabusth said that the City has not specifically done this in the past although those concerns were always addressed when accessory structure permits were requested. Mabusth said that a copy of the mapping of the septic sites approved with the preliminary subdivision would filed with a covenant or another appropriate document. The Planning Commission as a whole, with the exception of Planning Commissioner Cohen, did not object to the road be located in the designated wetland. In regard to configuration as a whole, Cohen indicated that he believed the plan was calling for more lots than the area can efficiently handle. Bellows said that the < nfiguration as shown would not get her approval, due to the flag lot and pushing the parcel to its limit of development. Brown said that he would vote favorably if it is demonstrated that the lots can handle two septic sites and if there are no variances required. He also conditioned that upon the septic being approved. Hanson said that he had trouble with the northwest configuration, the flag lot and that he felt the density was a bit too high. Moos opined that the development was too dense for the topography and that she too objected to the flag lot. Ml Carlson asked the Planning Commission for direction and more specific information as to what they would like to see him do. Kelley said that he would like to see all lots meet the width standard, irrespective of configuration, including a direct access to the lot. Bellows summarized that the road through the wetlands is no problem, but it must provide direct access to the dry buildable portion of the lots. The Planning Commission suggested that Mr. Carlson may have to revise his proposal showing one less lot along the east side in order to meet the 200* front width. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by NIHOTIS OF THE FlAHniiaG COMilSSIOll MBBTI1K3 SBPTBMBBR 18, 1989 S0HIB6 PILE «1457*<UUU.SOB COETIBDED Planning Comissioner Bellows, to table this application until such time that the septic report has been reviewed by the staff and Planning Coanission. Planning Coninissioner Bro*m questioned how the City would protect the draintile or drainage ditches running through this property? Mabusth replied that they would be protected with drainage easements. Kelley placed the applicant on notice that he should submit information pertaining to the location of the draintile before coming back before the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes«6, Mays*°0, Notion passed. #1440 1ST HATIOMAL BAEK OP TEE LAKES 2445 SHADTNOOD BOAD COmiEKCIAL SITE PUN MBVIEN COMTIMUATION OP PUBLIC HEAKIN6 7:58 P.N. TO 8:00 P.N. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Bank. Mr. Mark Winter was present as a representative for the Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth provided a brief explanation of the application being presented. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the commercial site plan for application #1440, and the installation of an additional lane. Motion, Ayes^O, Nays«0, Motion passed. #1441 DOE COPLET 1185 TOEKAWA BOAO VARIAECES OnrriEUATIOB op public HEARIEG 8:03 P.M. to 8:09 P.N. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Copley was present for this matter. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that staff's hardcover calculations had been incorrect due because a portion of the 0-75' setback area was not included. Staff has calculated that there will a 1.2% increase in hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. Mabusth said there will be a 1' to 1.5' encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. Planning Commissioner Hanson asked Mr. Copley whether he would be willing to remove existing hardcover in order to keep the percent of hardcover the same? Mr. Copley said that he would prefer not to remove any of the existing hardcover. iiiims OP THE puonm» comkissioh TIVG SBPTSnBS 18, 1989 S0HIH6 PILE #1441-COPLBT COHTIHUSD Planning Coininissioner Brown said that, the existing hardcover was 24%. He would be willing to allow the applicant to increase to 25% which is the waxlnium allowed. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance of approximately 1.5* and that hardcover was to be retained at 2.5%. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1452 MALTBK H. PBNBBRTOB 1720 SHMDTNOOD ROAD VARIARCB PUBLIC HBARIIIG 8:10 P.M. TO 8:11 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Pemberton were present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the Pemberton's proposal to convert an existing grade level deck into an addition to their dining room. Chairman Kelley asked whether the Pemberton’s had received any input from their neighbor to the south? Mr. Pemberton said that he had spoken to his neighbors on both sides and they had no objection. Planning Commissioner Brown asked if there was existing hardcover that could be removed? There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Brown reminded Mr. Pemberton that during their recent visit he had indicated that he would be removing hardcover from the back of the house. Mr. Pemberton said that he would be willing to "punch holes in the plastic that is presumed to be underlying the rockbed. Gaffron said that staff prefers to have the plastic removed, since hole punching is nearly impossible to verify. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application provided that the plastic underlying the rockbed in the northeast corner of the property is removed. Motion, Ayes=4, Bellows and Kelley, Nay, due to their preference to see hardcover removed rather than converted into permanent structure. Motion MIHIITBS or THE PLMRIIMG COHHISSIOH MBSTING SBPTl 18, 1989 S(»iIH6 FILE #14 52-PEMBERTON CONTINUED passed. 11453 fflLLIAM BIBBS 1905 FifiBSBBSS POIBT ROAD VARTJkMCBS PUBLIC HBARIBG 8:15 P.M. TO 8:25 P.N. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained ♦•het Mr. Hibbs was requesting a hardcover variance to enclose an existing canopy area. Gaffron said that there would be no increase in hardcover resulting from the conversion of the canopy/bi turn! nous area into a screen porch. Chairman Kelley told Mr. Hibbs that he was concerned about the fact that there was no existing garage. He said that more than likely there will be a future request for a garage. Mr. Hibbs replied that a tuck under garage would be most practical for this property. He said if a tuck under garage were constructed approximately 1,000 s.f. of bituminous could be removed. Planning Commissioner Cohen said that he would prefer to see Mr. Hibbs make application for a garage prior to proceeding with this application for the screen porch. Chairman Kelley said that he preferred not to change hardcover into structural hardcover. Mr. Hibbs said that the hardcover already exists. Planning Commissioner Bellows expanded on Chairman Kelley's concern about converting hardcover into structi’ral hardcover. She said that in order for the porch to be constructed, footings would have to be poured which would make more permanent an already excessive hardcover condition. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend denial of application #1453 requesting a hardcover variance to enclose an existing canopy area. Motion, Ayes=5, Hanson, Nay due to his belief that hardcover is hardcover. Motion passed. MIHUTBS OF flDB PIAMllMG COMUSSIOM MBBTI1I6 SeFTBIOBit 18, 1989 #1454 BRADFOKO W. KBDOICR 2695 PBBASABT ROAD VAKIARCB PUBLIC HBARIH6 8:26 P.N. TO 8:27 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this public hearing. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the basis for this application for an attached garage. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Reddick if there had been any opposition expressed by his neighbor to the south? Mr. Reddick said that he had spoken with the neighbor who indicated that he had no objections to this proposal. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Moos, to recommend approval of the 0.9' side setback variance to construct an attached garage. Motion, Ayes«5, Bellows, Hay, due to lack of a sufficient hardship. Motion passed. #1455 ALLAN LARSOM 3852 CHERRY AVBHUB VARIANCE PUBLIC BEARING 8:28 P.N. TO 8:45 P.N. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing Were duly noted. Mr. Allan Larson was present for this application. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant was tearing down an existing structure and will require a side setback variance in order to construct a new residence. The applicant owns two adjacent tax parcels. Gaffron said that there is a large oak tree centrally located on the property that the applicant wishes to preserve. The applicant submitted 5 options showing various locations of the house in relation to the tree. Gaffron noted that once the existing structure is removed, the City views the property as a new, buildable lot with the capability to meet all setback requirements without the need for variances. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commissioner Cohen concurred that there appears to be adequate area within the lot to meet setbacks if plans are redesigned. Mr. Larson disagreed, saying that there were many other 8 MIVOTBS OF TBS PLMmiHG CCBIMISSIOn MBBTIH6 SBPTBMBBR 18, 1989 ZOHIVG PILE «1455-JU[JAH lARSOM CCMTITOBD trees on the property in addition to the 38" oak tree. Mr. Larson also said that locating the hourse elsewhere may also create a problem with hardcover due to the need to make the driveway longer. He said that locating the house as proposed makes use of the more undesireable portions of the property. He said locating the house so that it extends onto Lot 10 would use portions of the property that would be best as lawn and tree area. Planning Commissioner Brown asked if there would be a need for any variance if the applicant chose Option A. Gaffron confirmed that no variance would be required. Mr. Dick Hanson, 3826 Cherry Place, said that he had reviewed Mr. Larson's plans and believes that the house would fit very nicely. Mr. Larson said that he preferred to use Option B as it would allow for the most clearance from the tree. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he too would view this as a "fresh start" and believed that Mr. Larson could develop a plan chat would not require a variance. Mr. Larson agsln stated that if he constructed the home in such a way to require no variance, then hardcover would Increase. Planning Commissioner Cohen pointed out that Option A did not require a variance. Mr. Larson said that would only allow 3' between the house and the oak tree. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that in her opinion. Option B did not allow enough room between the house and the tree either. She said that in order to build the house, there would be a need to excavate much closer to the tree than 5'. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend denial of the side setback variance to construct a new residence. Motion, Ayes»6, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1456 ROBERT & JAMET BMFIBLD 2240 DEVIH LABE AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:45 P.M. TO 8:46 P.H. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mrs. Emfield was present for this matter, as were Mr. and NIMOffiS OF WE FlAniHG COMNISSIOH iniiG SBPTBfBEB 18» 1989 :* ZORIII6 FILE •145«-BMFIBLD CONTINUKD Mrs. Brad ChiIdsr the prospective buyers of the property. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that this is an application requesting approval of an after-the-fact structure-to-structure setback variance for a detached garage. Gaffron said that approval of this variance should be conditioned upon inspection by the City to verify that appropriate fire walls exist in both garages. Mr. Childs expressed his support for the approval of the variance. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Cohe.; observed that the City had written a letter to the Emfields on June 17, 1986 and questioned whether anything further happened beyond that date? Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied that the Emfield's building contractor was supposed to meet with the City's Building Official, but did not follow through. Mrs. Emfield said that the contractor had indicated that he had followed through, but he had not. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved ''y Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Coh'~-.«, to recommend approval of the after-the-fact structure-to-structure setback variance for a detached garage, subject to the City's inspection of the fire wall and that the garage remain detached. Motion, Ayes-6, Mays^O, Motion passed. *1458 BLAKE M. BICBAHICH 332 NB8TLAKB STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:50 P.N. TO 9:05 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Bichanich were present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron provided a brief explanation of this application for a side setback variance to construct a second story addition. Gaffron also said that the ex.^sting drainfield system is small and does not meet the current codes, but it seems to be working. Gaffron also explained the septic concerns involved with the proposed expansion of this property (see MPG memo of 9/15/89). Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Bichanich what the current use of the guest house is and what he plans to do with the two lots? MIMDTBS OP THE PlAlliflw; COMflSSKHI ;TIH6 SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 S0HIB6 PILE «1458-BICBM|TCH COHTIEUED Mr. Bichanich said that he intends to combine the two lots# but he needs to refinance in order to do that. In order to refinance# he has to make some improvements to the house. He said that once the lots are combined and sewer goes in, he would either incoporate the guest house into the principal residence or remove it. Chairman Kelley Indicated that he too had a concern regarding the intensification of the use and the effect it will have on the septic system. Planning Commissioner Brown asked Gaffron if there was another drainfield site on the property? Gsffron replied th.nt it was very likely that a conforming system could not be installed. He said that the soil type will probably call for a mound system, but there is not enough area with suitable slopes on the lot for a mound system. Chairman Kelley questicied whether the combination of these two lots could be a conditior of approval? Gaffron and Mabusth believed that such a condition could be part of the approval of the V£riance. Mr. Bichanich presented a letter that he had received from a neighbor supporting his application. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Brown indicated that he was concerned about the septic system. Gaffron said that the septic code is not part of the zoning code. He said that he would have to take this issue to Council for some direction. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of the side setback variance to construct a second story addition. Kelley informed the Bichaniches that it is really the intent of the City to have these lots combined and the guest house torn down. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=0, Motion passed. *1459 JAMBS MULVAHNY 559 PARK XAHB VARIAMCBS PUBLIC HBARIHG 9:10 P.N. TO 9:11 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Mulvanny were present for this matter. MIHUTBS OF TBB PIAHHIHG C0MUSS108 MBBTIHG SEPTBMB8R IS# 19S9 XOHIHG PILB «1459>MIILVMnnr COHTIMDBD Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the Mulvanny's were requesting an average setback and hardcover variance to construct a room addition over an existing deck. Gaffron questioned whether it would be possible for the applicants to remove any existing hardcover. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Mulvanny what his hardship for the variance is? Mr. Mulvanny replied that their bedroom is 9' x 12' and the kitchen area is also quite small. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Mulvanny whether he intended to put a deck on the front side of the house? Mr. Mulvanny replied that he had a deck for so long that he would prefer not to have one any longer. Kelley informed Mr. Mulvanny that if approval is given for this application that it would preclude anyone from adding a deck anytime in the future. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recoiranend approval of the average lakecnore setback. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she was having a difficult time finding a hardship for the variance. Planning Commissioner Cohen said that he considered living with less than adequate space to be a hardship. Planning Commissioner Bellows asked Mr. Mulvanny how many bedrooms the house has and what size they are. Mr. Mulvanny said that there were three bedrooms, two of which are 10' x 10' and one is 9' x 12 Motion, Ayes=6, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1460 NARCO R. FRAMKLIH DEVELOPMEHT 1320 BALDDR PARK ROAD SUBDIVISIOH SKBTCH PLAN REVIEW Marco Franklin was present for this application as was Mr. Ed Vogt. The Planning Commission explained the City's position regarding access, water & sewer and the 75' setback zone. Chairman Kelley also noted that the applicant does not own all of the property. Mr. Franklin said that a purchase agreement had been entered into with Mr. David Mess for the property at the end of the point. Kelley said that he would not approve any hardcover variances for this very sensitive property. Kelley asked the applicants if they were familiar with the City's hardcover fC..- 4 MINUTES OF THE PIAHNING COMflS^ICW MBBTlWr SKPTCHBRB 18, 1989 ZONING PILE fl460~FRAMKLIN DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED ordinances? Mr. Vogt said that he was familiar with the hardcover ordinances, but was hopeful that the City would viev/ hardcover in this application as a whole. He said that their proposal would leave 70% of the area untouched. Kelley said that the City would look at hardcover proposed for each area. Kelley also observed that the applicant's proposal called for more than 25% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Mabusth advised the applicant that the City's ordinances would not allow for the consideration of hardcover coverage on the parcel as a whole. Planning Commissioner Bellows noted that the applicant's proposal had not given adequate consideration to the 931.5' elevation. Mabusth said that accessing the property via a public roadway had not been addressed, nor had the extension of sewer to the proposed units. Mr. Franklin said that with the tax structure as it is, and the cost of the land, it would not be economically fea«iible to build anything less than 10 units. Mr. Franklin said that the area of Baldur Park upon which he wishes to build, is currently littered with trash and is a trouble spot for the Orono Police. He felt that his development proposal would be beneficial to the City in many ways. Chairman Kelley said that he did not believe that area could support 10 units. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that ht. too would have difficulty recommending approval of the proposal as !*• is being presented at this time. APPROVAL OP PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to approve the minutes of the September 6, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Planning Commission member, Sarah Moos, would represent the Planning Commission at the October 9, 1989 City Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The September 18, 1989, Planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.