HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-15-1997 Planning Packet1
I
'r
5
t
PLANNING COMMISSION
WORK SESSION
December 15,1997
- -
6:30 p.m.
1 . Affordable Housing in Navarre Update - Brad
2. Variance Report - Liz
3. Tree Preservation - Mike
4.
5.
6.
7.
SIC Inventory - Brad
Home Occupations - Liz
1998 Application Forms - Liz
1998 Calendar - Liz
I
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
12/2/97
FROM:
RE:
Chair Lindquist and Planning Commission Membets
Ron Moorse. City Administrator
Brad Bressler, Planning Assistant
Affordable Housing Study of Navarre
ATTACHMENTS: A
B
C
Affordable Housing in Navarre
Sale Values of Properties in Navarre: 1996 and 1997
Navarre Housing Study Area Map
As an addendum to the Navarre Housing Study, the amount of housing that is considered affordable
in Navarre was calculated in November, 1997. The Metropolitan Council defines affordable housing
as housing that costs $ 120,000 per year or less per dwelling unit This is based on an average family
of four spending 30% of their income on housing. The total assessed value of each property was
calculated by adding the value of land and buildings for each property that includes a residence
according to the Hennepin County tax records. Table 1 is a summary of the fmdings in Attachment
A, the spreadsheet examining affordable housing in Navarre.
Table 1
Amount of Affordable Housing in Navarre
Area I Area II Area III Area IV Total
Affordable Properties (<$120,000)43 42 24 74 183
Other Properties (>$120,000)31 27 0 1 61
Total Properties 75 70 24 75 244
Percent Affordable 57%60%100%99%75%
The majority of housing within the study area has assessed values that qualify as affordable. In
Areas I and II slightly over one half of the housing is affordable. Almost all of the properties in
Areas III and IV are affordable. The value of houses along the lake in Areas I and II skew the
percentages in these two areas as lakefront property is generally of higher value than other
properties. If properties on Shadywood Road and Crystal Bay Road abutting the lake were
eliminated from the study, nearly all properties in the study area would be considered affordable.
Overall, three quarters of the houses, or 183 units in the study area fall into the affordable category.
r
The average assessed total property value is $ 107,801. The average sale value of properties is lower,
at $60,825. This is largely attributable to many of the prop>erties being sold a number of years ago
when property values were lower. The average date of sale is February 1990, which indicates that
home ownership and mobility are stable.
Table 2 is a summary of the findings in Attachment B, which identifies market values of properties
sold in the study area during 1996 and 1997.
Table 2
Sale Values for Properties In Navarre
Areal Area II Area III Area IV Total
Affordable Properties (<$120,000)
Other Properties (>$120,000)
1 6
0
19
6
Total Properties 8
Percent Affordable 75% 60%100%100% 76%
Of the 25 properties that sold during this time, 19, or 76% sold at or less than $120,000. This is
almost the same percentage that are considered affordable overall in the area based on assessed
value. Also consistent with the assessed values is the location of properties that sold at a price
within the affordable category. Due to proximity to the lake. Areas I and 11 had the lowest
percentage in the affordable category. All properties in Areas III and IV were affordable. The sale
value is only slightly higher than the assessed value for the properties. As an average, the houses
sold for $100,882 where $107,801 is the average assessed value for the entire study area.
Overall, houses in the study area are affordable, with the primary exception being those along the
lakeshore. The Navarre study area provides approximately 183 units of affordable housing, based
on the analysis of assessed value and a review of sales during the previous two years.
These units represent 6.5% of the housing units in Orono. The median value of owner occupied
single family homes is $173,000. The average owner occupied single family home is $227,300.
Orono has 24% of its housing stock valued at $75,000 to $125,000. The Navarre area contributes
significantly to the affordable housing stock in Orono.
1 i
! 5
Attachment A: AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NAVARREStrovtHun^bm Study Sul»-ArM Land Valua BuMng Vakia Total Ataaaaad Vaiua > 1120.000 SatoAiiKMiftt > $120,000 Siia DataNortharn Avanua Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Shadywood Road
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Northarn Avanua
Northarn Avanua
Togo Road
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Northarn Avanua
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Shadywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shadywood Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
Togo Road
35903670
3660
3725
3780
2227
3795
2237
2189
3700
3670
3680
3675
2229
3637
3720
3785
3645
2213
3685
3640
2117
3601
3690
3710
3765
2259
2245
2199
2205
3745
3680
3740
3640
3790
$22,400 $13,900 $36,300 TRUE n/a n/a rva$21,900 $18,000 $39,900 TRUE $32,155 TRUE Sap-96
$29,500 $14,500 $44,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$30,900 $25,200 $56,100 TRUE $45,000 TRUE Oct-90
$20,500 $40,500 $61,000 TRUE $56,925 TRUE Apr-89
$25,500 $38,500 $64,000 TRUE $57,000 TRUE Fab-90
$31,000 $55,000 $64,000 TRUE $64,000 TRUE Fab-86
$25,500 $43,500 $69,000 TRUE $47,000 TRUE Oct-93
$25,500 $44,500 $70,000 TRUE $89,900 TRUE Oct-94
$27,500 $42,500 $70,000 TRUE $56,000 TRUE Apr-87
$25,500 $45,500 $71,000 TRUE $75,000 TRUE Oct-93
$29,500 $41,500 $71,000 TRUE $15,000 TRUE Nov-72
$25,600 $45,500 $71,100 TRUE $51,500 TRUE Fab-92
$29,500 $42,500 $72,000 TRUE n/a n/a Mar-96
$27,500 $45,500 $73,000 TRUE $75,000 TRUE Mav-92
$27,500 $46,500 $74,000 TRUE $53,600 TRUE Nov-80
$25,500 $49,500 $75,000 TRUE $73,500 TRUE Oct-96
$27,500 $48,500 $76,000 TRUE $84,000 TRUE Jan-97
$25,500 $52,500 $78,000 TRUE $96,000 TRUE Aua-96
$34,500 $43,500 #78,000 TRUE $69,000 TRUE Jun-92
$24,000 $55,000 179,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$35,500 $45,500 •81,000 TRUE $66,500 TRUE May-88
$33,500 $47,500 #81,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$27,500 $53,500 #81,000 TRUE $80,000 TRUE Jul-96
$27,500 $55,500 #83,000 TRUE $65,000 TRUE Mar-83
$25,500 $58,500 #84,000 TRUE $83,000 TRUE Aug-96
$24,500 $61,500 $86,000 TRUE $69,000 TRUE Dac-86
$25,500 $61,500 $87,000 TRUE $71,000 TRUE Oct-90
$30,000 $58,000 $88,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$34,700 $53,600 $88,300 TRUE $109,900 TRUE Mar-93
$35,000 $54,000 $89,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$25,500 $63,700 $89,200 TRUE $83,000 TRUE Apr-94
$42,000 $48,000 $90,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
$35,500 $57,500 $93,000 TRUE $52,500 TRUE Oct-63
$25,500 $67,500 $93,000 TRUE n/a n/a n/a
Northern Avernie
Togo Road
Togo Road
Northern Avemie
Northern Avenue
Shedywood Road
Northern Avenue
Togo Road
Shedywood Road
Togo Road
Shedywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shedywood Roau
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Roed
Shadywood Road
Shedywood Roed
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Roed
Shedywood Roed
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Roed
Shedywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shadywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shedywood Road
Shadywood Road
3630
3635
3775
3700
3780
2177
3760
3600
2171
3760
2195
2264
2000
22S6
2024
2216
2200
2184
2130
2032
2232
2172
2208
2224
2080
2016
2240
2248
2178
2064
2092
2100
2118
2106
2142
2190
Attachment A: AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NAVARRE$23^000
$41,000
$21,800
$47,500
$31,500
$25,500
$30,000
$31,000
$42,500
$34,000
$25,500
$92,500
$91,500
$108,500
$84,000
$114,000
$114,000
$114,000
$136,400
$88,300
$114,000
$144,000
$106,300
$114,000
$187,000
$136,500
$114,000
$114,000
$114,000
$152,500
$144,500
$156,400
$208,000
$186,000
$163,500
$203,500
$71,000
$54,000
$74,800
$51,500
$70,500
$80,500
$79,000
$79,000
$70,500
$93,000
$118,500
$64,800
$69,500
$56,500
$86,000
$57,000
$59,000
$60,000
$38,900
$99,800
$81,000
$52,000
$96,100
$94,000
$112,000
$80,500
$115,000
$117,000
$126,000
$89,500
$68,900
$130,700
$83,000
$108,000
$131,500
$124,500
$94,000
$95,000
$96,600
$99,000
$102,000
$106,000
$109,000
$110,000
$113,000
$127,000
$144,000
$157,300
$161,000
$165,000
$170,000
$171,000
$173,000
$174,000
$175,300
$188,100
$195,000
$196,000
$202,400
$208,000
$217,000
$217,000
$229,000
$231,000
$240,000
$242,000
$287,100
$287,100
$291,000
$294,000
$295,000
$328,000
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
n/a
n/a
$67,000
n/a
$82,500
$76,000
n/a
72500
$92,000
n/a
$95,700
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$32,000
n/a
$167,000
n/a
$219.5^0
$62,000
n/a
190000
n/a
n/a
$275,000
$61,000
n/a
$204,000
n/a
$174,000
n/a
n/a
$155,000
$215,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
TRUE
n/a
TRUE
TRUE
n/a
TRUE
TRUE
n/a
TRUE
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
TRUE
n/e
FALSE
n/e
FALSE
TRUE
n/e
FALSE
n/a
n/a
FALSE
TRUE
n/a
FALSE
n/a
FALSE
n/a
n/a
FALSE
FALSE
n/a
n/e
n/e
Mer-87
n/e
May-91
Sep-81
n/e
Aug-84
Jun-81
n/e
Jul-82
n/e
n/a
n/e
n/e
Aug*71
n/e
Jul-92
n/a
Feb-96
Mer-76
Dec-94
Mer-93
n/e
n/e
Oct-96
Jun-77
n/e
May-63
n/e
Dec-91
n/e
n/a
Feb-79
Jul-91
Aug-94
■j
$366,000 FALSE Aug*95$255,000 FALSE Aug-93n/a n/a n/a$340,000 FALSE Jul-89n/a n/a n/an/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a Jun-95
176,000 TRUE Mar-81
$68,500 TRUE D- >93
$90,000 TRUE Mar-97
$57,000 TRUE Jan-64
$56,200 TRUE Jun-89
$62,000 TRUE Dac-88
$60,000 TRUE Mar-86
$111,000 TRUE Jan-95
n/a n/a n/a
$96,500 TRUE Sap-94
$94,000 TRUE Nov-92
$150,117 FALSE Jan-97
$75,000 TRUE May-92
n/a n/a n/a
$75,000 TRUE Apr-83
n/a n/a n/a
$60,000 TRUE Jun-92
n/a•n/a n/a
$140,000 FALSE Nov-96
n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a
$13,000 TRUE Aug-70
$60,500 TRUE Dac-85
$42,400 TRUE Feb-93
$120,000 TRUE May-96
$38,000 TRUE Aug-95
$129,000 FALSE Feb-95
$61,000 TRUE Mar-96
$75,500 TRUE Mar-93
n/a/a n/a/a Jufi-95iEMar*81
JE D' >93
^E Mar-97
IE Jao-64
IE Jun-89
IE Oac-88
IE Mar-86
IE Jan-95
fa n/a
IE Sap-94
IE Nov-92
E Jan-97
E May-92
^a n/a
E Apr-83
a n/a
E Jun-92
'a n/a
E Nov-96
B n/a
a n/a
E Aug-70
E Dac-85
E Fab-93
E May-96
E Aug-95
E Feb-95
E Mar-96
E Mar-93
$39,500$52,000 $172,500$402,000 $212,000$454,000 FALSEFALSE n/an/a n/an/a Sep-94n/e$16,600 $57,700 $74,300 TRUE n/a n/a Auo-95$17,000 $60,000 $77,000 TRUE $65,000 TRUE Jul-90$15,000 $63,400 $78,400 TRUE $66,800 TRUE Sep-90$17,000 $63,000 $80,000 TRUE $64,600 TRUE Jui-91$17,000 $63,300 $80,300 TRUE $79,900 TRUE Sep-83$17,000 $64,000 $81,000 TRUE $91,900 TRUE Mey-84$17,000 $64,000 $81,000 TRUE $77,500 TRUE Mey-94
$17,000 $64,500 $81,500 TRUE $77,000 TRUE Jul-92
$17,000 $65,000 $82,000 TRUE $60,000 TRUE Sep-90
$15,700 $67,400 $83,100 TRUE $71,500 TRUE Mer-91
$15,800 $69,500 $85,300 TRUE $83,900 TRUE Jul-92
$17,000 $69,000 $86,000 TRUE $97,000 TRUE Mer-95
$16,300 $69,900 $86,200 TRUE $84,691 TRUE Apr-91
$17,000 $70,000 $87,000 TRUE $76,900 TRUE Mey-89
$17,000 $70,000 $87,000 TRUE $92,000 TRUE Nov-92
$17,000 $71,000 $88,000 TRUE $91,000 TRUE Sep-92
$17,000 $72,000 $89,000 TRUE $77,730 TRUE Dec-90
$17,000 $72,000 $89,000 TRUE $89,000 TRUE Oec-96
$17,000 $74,000 $91,000 TRUE $68,500 TRUE Jul-89
$17,000 $74,000 $91,000 TRUE $92,500 TRUE Mey-83
$17,000 $77,000 $94,000 TRUE $87,000 TRUE Dec-92
$17,000 $77,600 $94,600 TRUE n/a n/a Jun-94
$17,000 $78,500 $95,500 TRUE $56,500 TRUE Mar-93
$79,000 $96,000 TRUE $81,780 TRUE Apr-89
Attachment A: AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NAVARRECrystal Place UvifHlston Avenue Lyric Avenue Shedywood Road Crystal Place Crystal Place Livingston Avenue Shadywood Road Livingston Avernie
Livingston Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Livir>gston Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Lyric Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Lyric Avenue
Crystal Place
Livingston Avenue
Livingston Avenue
Livingston Averuje
Livingston Avenue
Lyric Avenue
Shadywood Road
Lyric Avenue
Crystal Place
Lyric Avenue
Lyric Avenue
Shadywood Road
Crystal Place
Crystal Place
Lyric Avenue
Livirtgston Avenue
Lyric Avenue
Lyric Avenue
IV $22,000 $36,800IV$25,500 $34,400IV$25,500 $34,500IV$22,500 $39,500IV$25,500 $37,500IV$25,500 $37,500IV$30,000 $33,000IV$25,000 $38,000IV$25,500 $38,500
IV $25,500 $38,500
IV $25,300 $41,300
IV $25,500 $41,500
IV $25,500 $41,500
IV $30,000 $37,000
IV $25,500 $41,50<D
IV $25,500 $42,500
IV $25,500 $42,500
IV $25,500 $42,500
IV $25,500 $44,500
IV $30,000 $40,000
IV $23,600 $47,000
IV $25,500 $45,500
IV $25,500 $45,500
IV $25,500 $45,500
IV $25,500 $46,500
IV $27,000 $45,500
IV $30,000 $43,000
IV $25,500 $47,500
IV $28,000 $45,400
IV $25,000 $49,000
IV $12,200 $62,200
IV $25,500 $49,500
IV $21,500 $53,500
IV $25,500 $51,500
IV $30,000 $47,000
IV $30,000 $47,000
$58,800$59,900$60,000$62,000$63,000$63,000$63,000$63,000$64,000$64,000
$66,600
$67,000
$67,000
$67,000
$67,000
$68,000
$68,000
$68,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,600
$71,000
$71,000
$71,000
$72,000
$72,500
$73,000
$73,000
$73,400
$74,000
$74,400
$75,000
$75,000
$77,000
$77,000
$77,000
n/an/an/a$53,000$41,521n/an/a$45,000$37,300$44,900
$83,900
$69,000
$17,000
$54,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
$52,900
$68,000
$58,000
$24,000
$50,000
$18,900
$59,900
$56,600
$24,000
n/a
$61,300
$63,000
n/a
n/a
$74,900
n/a
$65,500
$46,000
$61,500
n/m
Area 1 Area II
n/M $44,904
Area III Area IV
$63,023
Total
$107,801
TRUE Count 43 42 24 74 183
FALSE Count 31 27 0 1 61
Grind Count 75 70 24 75 244
Pwremit A ffordmbh 57%60%100%99%75%
Togo Road 3670 1 $21,900 $18,000 $39,900 TRUE $32,155 TRUE Sep-96Togo Road 3785 1 $25,500 $49,500 $75,000 TRUE $73,500 TRUE Oct-96Togo Road 3690 1 $27,500 $53,500 $81,000 TRUE $80,000 TRUE Jul-96Togo Road 3765 1 $25,500 $58,500 $84,000 TRUE $83,000 TRUE Aug-96Togo Road 3645 1 $27,500 $48,500 $76,000 TRUE $84,000 TRUE Jan-97Shadywood Road 2213 1 $25,500 $52,500 $78,000 TRUE $96,000 TRUE Aug-96Shadywood Road 2032 1 $88,300 $99,800 $188,100 FALSE $219,500 FALSE Feb-96Shadywood Road 2016 1 $136,500 $80,500 $217,000 FALSE $275,000 FALSE Oct-96
Bayviaw Place 2305 II $25,500 $65,500 $91,000 TRUE $61,000 TRUE Mar>96
Crystal Bay Road 3339 II $64,000 $51,000 $115,000 TRUE $63,000 TRUE Jarh96
Crystal Bay Road 3435 II $66,300 $47,000 $113,300 TRUE $67,888 TRUE Apr-96
Crystal Bay Road 3365 II $54,500 $59,500 $114,000 TRUE $78,900 TRUE Nov-96
Kenwood Way 2150 II $22,500 $38,500 $61,000 TRUE $90,000 TRUE Mar-97
Bayview Race 2215 II $30,000 $53,000 $83,000 TRUE $120,000 TRUE May-96
Navarre Lane 3324 11 $22,500 $52,500 $75,000 TRUE $140,000 FALSE Nov-96
Crystal Bay Road 3405 II $88,000 $89,000 $177,000 FALSE $144,500 FALSE Apr-96
OKve Avenue 2314 II $25,500 $42,500 $68,000 TRUE $150,117 FALSE Jan-97
Lafayette Ridge Court 3265 II $41,500 $110,500 $152,000 FALSE $190,000 FALSE Sep-96
Lyric AverKie 3665 III $17,000 $72,000 $89,000 TRUE $89,000 TRUE Dec-96
Livir^iston Avenue 3438 IV $25,500 $38,500 $64,000 TRUE $37,300 TRUE Apr-96
Lyric Aversje 3585 IV $25,500 $28,500 $54,000 TRUE $39,500 TRUE Dec-96
Shadywood Road 2296 IV $22,500 $39,500 $62,000 TRUE $53,000 TRUE Jun-96
Livingston Averuje 3444 IV $25,500 $41,500 $67,000 TRUE $69,000 TRUE May-96
Lyric Avenue 3525 IV $30,000 $52,000 $82,000 TRUE $88,400 TRUE Aug-96
Livingston Avenue 3585 IV $25,500 $58,500 $84,000 TRUE $97,280 TRUE Mar-96
Ssh Vmkn $95,612 $100,882
Area 1 Area 11 Area III Area IV Total
TRUE Count 6 6 1 6 19 •
FALSE Count 2 4 0 0 6
Grand Count 8 10 1 6 25
Asfcenr AHordMm 75%60%100%100%76%
I -u*Tir —iniHi mi ijii* tjsj.«ji m: ^ .l .":i«
m/M
•»
^‘2
l^lMt-----
»m0 0t9$$
(£5>
tv
/II.
AUF.A l'
(l)llic)
.m..
I .,0*1 I
W^Wi^111*.*•
jiXn.
•vrjiv .li;\ A>J
■i
I •
•
1
I*! •
r
-1—
•
•
fin ••
i«—
d5^
—oi\-
III f
I^ARICA III
0
-J^—
-yt.”(fj: (CilCClO
—iri
". {-aibEra
%
Jw% " •'•*■
mM ' ““
e>w* * .Vjt'd'-
•4W »M«
I I
IMI
, - - ySt>^
-• '“V* * •
!jI
.1
..-;.‘c>' v‘.-J>^;r.-.«':'-
*• M
J / t.ft CJl\9
, C I Ml
fiM.II Ml > »•* * V • •» f #•
r
TO:Chair Lindquist and Planning Commission Members
FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator
RE:Variance Analysis
June 1994 to June 1997
Staff has reviewed all of the variance applications that were made during a three year pen^ of time,
from June 1994 to June 1997. The purpose of the study was to determine what types of vanances
are most common, the approval rate, and whether there is one or more zoning distnets or areas m
the city of Orono that generates more variances than other areas.
Brad Bressler, planning intern, conducted the study and prepared the tables and spreadsheets that are
found in this report.
1
Variance Analysis
December 15,1997
page--1
?
* r
!
I
VARIANCE ANALYSIS
State Laws Regarding Variances
. ••
The state of Minnesota has granted the authority to municipalities in the state to grant appeals to
their zoning ordinances. MN Statutes 462.357, Subd. 6, grants the authority to the city of Orono to
provide a method to appeal zoning ordinance requirements. These actions are commonly referred
to as "variances”. Variances are typically reviewed by a body called the Board of Adjustment or
Appeals or a Zoning and Planning Commission and/or City Council. The law specifically gives the
authority to:
To hear and decide ^^)eals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement,
decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in enforcement of the To ning
ordinance, and;
2) To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where
their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is
demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship as used in connectic .i with the granting of a variance means:
The property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed
by the official controls; and
the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner; and
3) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
4) there is inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
In granting v^ances, the governing body may impose conditions in the granting of variances to
insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. Economic considerations alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the
ordinance. The governing body may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the
ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. However, the
governing body may permit a variance for the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two
family dwelling. No definition of temporary is provided by state law.
The courts have interpreted laws regarding variances to mean that the property owner shall
Variance Analysis
December 15, 1997
page--2
demonstrate that if compliance with the ordinance occurred, there would be no reasonable use of the
owner ’s property. The fact that the property owner might make a greater profit by using the property
in a manner prohibited by the ordinance is considered irrelevant. At least part of the essence of
zoning is the common protection that it affords all property owners, on the theory that all will benefit
if they comply.
A major restriction that must be observed is that the hardship which serves as a basis for granting
the variance must be unique to the property of the applicant. If the condition of which the owner
complains in city or area-wide, it must be presumed that the municipality is aware of this condition.
Where general conditions are found to exist, the proper relief is an amendment to the ordinance, not
the granting of a variance.
The variance that is granted must also be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
ordinance and preserve its spirit. In interpreting the statutory language on which this requirement
is based, the courts have said that the governing authority may not grant a variance authorizing the
applicant to enlarge a nonconforming use or in any way make it more permanent. In most states,
including Minnesota, the governing body may not grant a use variance based on the theory that a use
variance amounts to an exercise of legislative authority.
In recommending variances for approval, the Planning Commission is to safeguard the public safety
and welfare. Unlike an ordinary court, the Plaiming Commission and City Council serve as an
advocate of the public interest. This should be the foremost consideration, rather than considering
the duties as arbitration of disputes among private parties. If more harm will be done to neighboring
properties by granting a variance than denying it, the variance should be denied.
In granting variances, the governing body has the power to place conditions on the variance since
a variance is regarded as a special privilege rather than as a right. The property owner, in order to
enjoy it, must comply with whatever reasonable conditions are imposed, even though they may go
beyond the permissible range of ordinary police power regulations.
Variances bv Zoning District
Table 1 lists the number of variance applications by zoning district. The zoning district that had the
most variances is the LR-IC district. This is the zoning district for ail of Casco Point, Fagemess
Point, along Shadywood Road and the northern part of Navarre along Crystal Bay Road. The
minimum lot sizes in the LR-IC district is 1/2 acres. The lot width requirement is 100'. The front
and rear setback is 30'. The side yard setback is 10'. Many of the existing lots in this district do not
meet the minimum requirements.
Variance Analysis
December 15,1997
page-3
L
TABl£l
LR-IC 122 30.4%78.7%
LR-IB 119 29.7%79.8%
LR'IA 82 20.4%75.6%
RR-IB 41 10.2%82.9%
B-2 15 3.7%60%
RR'IA 14 3.5%92.9%•
B-1 4 1*100%
R-IA 4 1%25%
TOTAL 401 100%
T alfpshore Residential Zoning Districts
The lakcshorc residential districts had the most variance applications during the time period
reviewed. Variances in the LR districts represented 323 of 401 or SO.Syo of all applications. The
approval rate for LR districts was between 75% and 80%.
Rural Residential Zoning Districts
The rural residential districts had 55 variances during the time period studied. This represented
13.7% of all variance applications. Variances in the RR districts had a higher rate of approval
between 82% and 93%. The rural residential districts have greater minimum lot widths and lot area
requirements. The front setbacks are also greater. Most of the variances in these zoning districts
were for setback requirements.
Approval Rates
Table 2 lists the approval rate for variances during the study period. Overall, 78.3 /4 of all the
variances were approved. Only 6.7% of the variances were denied. Thirty of the applications wre
iq^oroved as revised, which represented 7.5% of all applications. Another thirty of the applications
were either tabled or withdrawn.
TART.E 2
JC w «>» *>•»
Approved
Denied
Modified
Tabled
Withdrawn
Total 410
78.3%
6.7%
7.5%
3.7%
3.7%
100%
Variance Analysis
December 15,1997• •page--4 •
Lot Area bv Zoning District
• ^ *
Table 3 categorizes the range of lot sizes by zoning district for the variances filed during the study
period. Between 55.7% and 79.3% of the lots zoned lakeshore residential were substandard for lot
size. A smaller amount, 36.6% to 50% of the rural residential lots did not meet the minimum lot
requirements.
TABLE 3
Variance Analysis
December IS, 199V
page~5
• "».<a
WM
■VC
1
;i499.*:»Mmiacre'rji W
ji cr te: :
B-1 .46
acre
4 Q/a n/z n/a n/2L n/a n/a n/a n/a 100%
LR-
1C acre
11 57 16 14 1 n/a 1 n/a n/a 55.7%
LR-
IB
1 acre 23 24 18 6 13 16 3 n/a o/a 61.3%
R'lA 1 acre n/a n/a 1 vJdL 3 n/a n/di n/a n/a 25%
LR-
lA
2
acres
11 9 1 16 11 17 3 n/a 5 79.3%
B-2 2
acres
n/a
1
11 n/a
1
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 100%
RR-
IB
2 acre 7
1
2 3 n/a 3 t Jz 10 3 5 36.6%
RR-
lA
5
acres
n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 T\/d.n/a 3 7
!
50%
r
I
Variance Tvoes
• ••
Table 4 lists the number of variances by type. The study confirms that approximately of all
variances during the study period »-ere for hardcover. Side setback variances represented 14.24 of
all the variances. Average lakeshore setback variances accounted for 10.2% of all apphcations.
More than 80% of all average lakeshore setback variances were approved. Lakeshore setback
variances represented 34 applications or 8.5 % of all requests. More than 3 out of every 4 l^eshore
setback variances were granted. Lot area and lot width variances each represented 5JA of al
applications. The approval rate was 87% for both lot area and lot width variances. Structural
coverage variances accounted for 6.7% of the total and were granted 7 out of 10 times.
Findings
The analysis of the applications filed during the last three years appear to indicate several trends.
First, as expected, lots zoned as lakeshore residential generate the bulk of variance applications.
This seems logical as these are the lots where more restrictions apply—hardcover, lakeshore setback,
and average lakeshore setback. Further, most of these lots were platted at lot area and wid^ sm^ler
than the current zoning requirements. The approval rate for these lots is roughly 75%. This is a gh
rate of jqiproval.
The high rate of approval may indicate that variances are being granted for lakeshore lots where true
hardships under the state's definition do not exist. This is driven by the desire to replace smaller,
cabin-like structures on the lakefront with newer, larger residences that include bigger garages on
lots that have less lot width and area than required by the minimum standards. Does the current
zoning scheme and minimum standards for lakeshore lot advance or hinder the City's vision for
lakeshore lots?
Secondly, this study may suggest that there are some types of variances that could be codified in the
ordinance. For example, when a zoning lot is on a point and adjacent residences ok more than a
certain distance away and the topography is such that the proposed change doesn't effect views,
should an average lakeshore setback variance be required? Should a variance be needed to allow
additions to a residence that is already closer than 10' to a swimming pool? Perhaps some vanances
could be eliminated.
Finally, the study begs the question as to whether there are some types of variances that should not
ever be granted. One such issue may be the size of accessory structures. There is a chart in the
zoning ordinance that relates size of a lot to the number and size of allowed accessory structures.
Why should a variance be granted that strays from this chart? Is the chart unreasonable or does it
adequately reflect the community's standard regarding accessory structures? Should criteria be
established for when it is appropriate to increase structural coverage beyond 15%? When should a
variance be granted for height; when is there ever a hardship?
Variance Anafysis
December 15. 1997
Page-6
. *•
TABLE 4
^-4'-Ji ri .t.?:*ii
Hardcover 73’ to
230*
32 13%38 73%
Hardcover 0’ to 75’30 12.5%34 68%
Hardcover 230’ to
300’
6 1.3%5 100%
Total Hardcover m 26.9%78 72.2%
Side Setback 57 14.2%44 77%
Front Setback 28 7%24 85.7%
Rear Setback 7 1.7%7 100%
Side Street Setback 3 .7%2 66%
Total Yard Setback 95 23.7%77 81%
Average Lakesbore
Setback
41 10.2%34 82.9%
Lakesbore Setback 34 8.3%26 76.5%
Bluff Setback 3 .7%1 33%
Total Lake/Bbtff
Setbacks
78 19.5%61 78.2%
Lot Area 23 5.7%20 87%
Lot Width 23 5.7%20 87%
Total Lot
AreoTWidth
46 n.5%40 87%
Total Structural
Coverage
27 6.7%19 70.4%
Total
Miscellaneous
47 n.7%41 87.2%
r
Conclusion • ’
* •
/
The puipose of this study was to provide factual information about the number and type of variances
tlwt have been processed during the last three years. It may also be a starting point to review
discussions about the relationship between the comprehensive plan land use goals and zoning
regulations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To review the study and discuss with staff.
Variance Analysis
December IS, 1997
Pagf--7
VARIANCE ABBREVIATION KEY
. '
Abbreviation ^
/
Type of Variance
ALS average lakeshore setback
ALT land alteration
BPS bluff setback
BS boat storage
CV clearing vegetation
FH fence height
FS front setback
HC hardcover
HT height
IFPS in front of principal structure
LA lot area
LLD lakeshore lot depth
LS lakeshore setback
LW lot width
OAS oversize accessory structure
RS rear setback
SC structural coverage
SEP structural separation
SIGN sign height/area
SS side setback
STS street side setback
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997FMt Address Zoning Lot Area Type of Variance Specific Project Requested Approved Result21073340 Shoreline Dr B-1 1.52 acres RS of 35*restaurant, fuel station 5*5*approved
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1 1.52 acres SC of 15%restaurant, fuel station 20.20%20.20%approved
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1 1.52 acres SIGN of 100 sq.restaurant, fuel station 308 sq. ft.308 sq. ft.approved
2107 3340 Shoreline Or B-1 1.52 acres SS of 10*restaurant, fuel station 3*3*approved
B-1 Count 4
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres FS of 30*repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 17*17*approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres LA of 2 acres repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 1.86 acres (existing)1.86 acres approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres LLD of 200*repI acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 115* (existing)115*approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres LS of 75*repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 47*AT approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres PR repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 71 spaces (68 ex.)71 spaces approved
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres ALT in 0*-75*alteration for parking, bluff alteration 5,000 cu yd denied denied
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres CV in 0*-75*alteration for parking, bluff alteration removing 6" trees denied denied
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres HC 0*-75*alteration for parking, bluff alteration 7.3% (.06% ex.)denied denied
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres HC 0'-75*repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 1800 sq ft denied denied
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres HC 75*-250*alteration for parking, bluff alteration 53.57%denied denied
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres BS in 0*-75*repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond on parking lot on grass modified
1947 1955 Shoreline Dr B-2 ?FS of 30*relocate accessory structure 10’10*approved
1947 1955 Shoreline Or B-2 ?FS of 30*relocate accessory structure 10*10*approved
1947 1955 Shoreline Dr B-2 ?HC 75*-250*relocate accessory structure 83.6% (existing)83.60%approved
1947 1955 Shoreline Dr B-2 7 PR relocate accessory structure 41 (42 ex.)41 approved
B*2 Count 15
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre LA of 2 acres replace residence .195 acre (existing).195 acre approved
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre LW of 200*replace residence 58*58*approved
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre SC of 15%replace residence 27.6% (29.6% ex.)27.60%approved
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre FS of 50*replace residence 44.5*37.5*modified
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre HC 0’-75*replace residence 54.96% (63.58% ex 50.4 V%modified
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A . 195 acre HC 75*-250*replace residence 67.86%61.08%modified
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre LS of 75*replace residence 20* (17* ex.)25*modified
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre SS of 30*replace residence 1*2*modified
2083 1535 Long Lake Blvd LR-1A .21 acre SC of 15%replace deck, stairs 20%20%approved
2083 1535 Long Lake Blvd LR-1A .21 acre HC 0*-7b*replace deck, stairs 16.29% (existing)8%• |modified
2083 1535 Long Lake Blvd LR-IA .21 acre HC 75*-250*replace deck, stairs 87.35% (existing)83.70% - •modified
1973 1509 Long Lake Blvd LR-1A .383 acre ALS replace accessory structure, new deck 61* (72* ex.)tabled tabled
1973 1509 Long Lake Blvd LR-IA .383 acre BFS of 30*replace accessory structure, new deck 15*tabled -
4 •_
tabled
19731973
1973
2088
2088
2088
2088
2140
2099
2099
2099
2117
2117
2091
2091
2091
2104
2104
2104
2104
2241
2241
2063
2063
2066
2071
2143
2066
2159
2066
2020
2066
2066
1943
1943
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19971509 Long Lake Bivd 1509 Long Lake 81 vd
1509 Long Lake Blvd
3770 Bayside Rd
3770 Bayside Rd
3770 Bayside Rd
3770 Bayside Rd
1490 Long Lake Blvd
372 West Lake St
372 West Lake St
372 West Lake St
1473 Bay Ridge Rd
1473 Bay Ridge Rd
1065 Ferndale Rd W
1065 Ferndale Rd W
1065 Ferndale Rd W
1065 W Ferndale Rd
1065 W Ferndale Rd
1065 W Ferndale Rd
1065 W Ferndale Rd
1185 Ferndale Rd W
1185 Ferndale Rd W
3775 Bayside Rd
3775 Bayside Rd
1487 Shoreline Dr
1420 Bracketts Pt Rd
3465 East Lake St
1487 Shoreline Dr
1400 Bracketts Pt Rd
1487 Shoreline Dr
565 Leaf St
1487 Shoreline Dr
1487 Shoreline Dr
2455 Scotch Pine Ln
2455 Scotch Pine Ln
LR-1ALR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-1A
.383 acre .383 acre
.383 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.744 acre
.76 acre
.76 acre
.76 acre
.824 acre
.824 acre
.878 acre
.878 acre
.878 acre
.88 acre
.88 acre
.88 acre
.88 acre
.887 acre
.887 acre
.894 acre
.894 acre
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
1 acre
1 acre
HC 0 ’-75*HC 75’-250 ’
SS of 30 ’
FS of 50 ‘
HC 250*-500*
SS of 30*
STS of 50*
FS of 50*
HC 75*-250*
LW of 200*
SS of 50*
HC 75*-250’
LS of 75*
ALS
HC 75*-250*
LS of 75*
ALS
LA of 2 acres
LW of 140*
LW of 200*
LS of 75*
SS of 30*
HC 0*-75*
LS of 75*
ALS
ALT in 0*-75*
HC 0*-75*
HC 0*-75*
HC 0*-75*
LS of 75’
LW of 200*
SC of 15%
SS of 30*
HC 75*-250*
SS of 30*
replace accessory structure, new deck 13% (3% ex.) replace accessory structure, new deck 33.80%
replace accessory structure, new deck 5*
remodel residence, addition to residence 45’
remodel residence, addition to residence 48.2% (45.5% ex.)
remodel residence, addition to residence 3.5'
remodel residence, addition to residence 15’
addition to residence, extend roof 30 ’ (35.1* ex.)
lot line rearrangement, repair residence 28.80%
lot line rearrangement, repair residence 190’
lot line rearrangement, repair residence 20 ’
addition to residence, retaining wall 26.7% (existing)
addition to residence, retaining wall
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
enclose deck, garage addition
enclose deck, garage addition
replace deck
replace deck
rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
replace retaining wall
extend, realign, and replace roof
rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
stair imp, rest grto, rw rep
rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
subdivision
rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
new deck, elevator
new deck, elevator
69’
encroach
38.9% (42.3% ex.)
42’
19’
.88 acre
180 ’ (existing)
180 ’ (existing)
71’ (existing)
19.1’
4.04% (existing)
58’
13’
approval
72 sq. ft.
36.14% (39.18 ex.)
.7% (existing)
encroach
199.98’
15.37%
16’, 19’
29.8% (29.6% ex.)
21’ (10.34’ ex.)
tabledtabled
tabled
45’
48.20%
3.5’
15’
30 ’
denied
denied
denied
26.70%
69’
encroach
38.90%
42’
19’
.88 acre
180 ’
180 ’
71*
denied
4.04%
58’
13’
approved
72 sq. ft.
36.14%
0.70%
encroach
199.98'
15.37%. ,
16’, 19* • ••
29.80%
21’
tabledtabled
tabled
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
denied
denied
denied
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
denied
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997
2099 372 West Lake St LR-1A
2099 372 West Lake St LR-1A
2099 372 West Lake St LR-1A
2133 1385 0ronoLn LR-IA
2133 1385 0ronoLn LR-IA
2200 2435 N Shore Dr LR-IA
2200 2435 N Shore Or LR-IA
2200 2435 N Shore Or LR-IA
2200 2435 N Shore Dr LR-IA
1998 3780 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1998 3780 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1996 309 Westlake St LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA
196B 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
196B 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1968 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1968 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1968 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1968 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA
1992 1400 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA
2010 1420 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA
1992 1400 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA
1992 1400 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA
2010 1420 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA
2142 2525 North Shore Dr LR-IA
2142 2525 North Shore Dr LR-IA
2142 2525 North Shore Dr LR-IA
LR-IA Count 82
1.09 acres
1.09 acres
1.09 acres
1.2 acres
1.2 acres
1.3 acres
1.3 acres
1.3 acres
1.3 acres
1.51 acres
1.51 acres
1.6 acres
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.94 acre
1.97 acre
1.97 acre
1.97 acre
1.97 acre
1.97 acre
1.97 acre
13.8 acres
13.8 acres
13.8 acres
13.8 acres
13.8 acres
2.11 acres
2.11 acres
2.11 acres
HC 75 -250*
LW of 200*
SS of 50*
HC 0 -75*
LS of 75*
HC 250'-500*
LA of 2 acres
LW of 200'
SS of 30'
LA of 2 acres
LW of 200'
SS of 30 ’
FS of 50'
HC 0'-75'
HC 75'-250
LA of 2 acres
LS of 75'
LW of 200*
SC of 15%
SS of 30*
ALT in 0 ’-75'
BFS of 30'
CV in 0 -75'
HC 0'-75'
LA of 2 acres
LW of 200'
HC 0'-75*
OAS > 3,000 sq
OAS > 3,000 sq
SC of 15%
SS of 30 ’
ALS
LS of 75*
HC 0 ’-75’
lot line rearrarvgement, repair residence
lot line rearrangement, repair residence
lot line rearrangement, repair residence
new patio
new patio
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
addition over residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
new residence, retaining wall, driveway
retaining wall, accesory structure addn
repairs to accessory structure
retaining wall, accesory structure addn
retaining wall, accesory st'ucture addn
repairs to accessory structure
addition to residence
addition to residence
.’addition to residence
35%denied denied
190’denied denied
20 ’denied denied
15.8% (17.04% ex.) 15.80%approved
40 ’ 126’ ex.)40 ’approved
36.5% (36.6% ex.)36.5’approved
1.3 acre (existing)1.3 acre approved
120* (existing)120’approved
16.2’, 13.5’ (existin 16.2’, 13.approved
1.51 acres (existing)1.51 acres approved
149’ (existing)149’approved
12’12’approved
43’ (46’ ex.)43’approved
52.6% (63.58 ex.)52.60%approved
67.86% (100% ex.)67.86%approved
.194 acre (existing).194 acre approved
20 ’ (17 ex.)20 ’approved
58’58’approved
27.6% (29.6% ex.)27.60%approved
11.7’, r (O’ existing 11.7’, 1’approved
approval approved approved
approval approved approved
replanting replanting approved
42.60%42.60%approved
1.97 acres (existing)1.97 acres approved
165’ (existing)165’approved
9% (.8% ex.)9.00%approved
5,478 sq. ft.5,478 sq. f approved
5,478 sq. ft.5,478 sq. f approved
0 ’0 ’approved
4’4’approved
23’23’approved
39.6’ (21’ ex.)39.6’approved
21.15%20.25%modified
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2188 1570 North Arm Dr LR-1B
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B
2138 630 Park Ln LR-1B
2138 630 Park Ln LR-1B
2138 630 Park Ln LR-1B
2131 4149 Highwood Rd LR-1B
2131 4149 Highwood Rd LR-1B
2131 4149 Highwood Rd LR-1B
1994 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1994 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1994 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1 B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
2231 1260 Spruce PI LR-1B
2168 4190 Highwood Rd LR-1B
2172 4195 Forest Lake Dr LR-1B
2175 4784 North Shore Dr LR-1B
2125 4760 North Shore Dr LR-1B
2125 4760 North Shore Dr LR-1 B
2125 4760 North Shore Dr LR-1B
2148 1390 Park Dr LR-1B
2247 1390 Park Dr LR-1B
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
.156 acre FS of 35’replace residence, accessory structure 13' (5.3* ex.)13’approved.156 acre HC 0 -75*replace residence, accessory structure 17.8% (25% ex.)17.8*approved
.156 acre LA of 1 acre replace residence, accessory structure .156 acre (existing).156 acre approved
.156 acre LS of 75*replace residence, accessory structure 28.5' (22’ ex.)28.5’approved
.156 acre LW of 140*replace residence, accessory structure 50'50’approved
.156 acre SS of 10*replace residence, accessory structure 3* (6.5% ex.)3’approved
.156 acre SC of 15%replace residence, accessory structure 22.70%22%modified
.158 acre FS of 35’new accessory structure 32’ (34.5* ax.)32’approved
.22 acre ALS addition to residence 68.6* (existing)68.6’i^roved
.22 acre FS of 35*addition to residence 20.9’ (existing)20.9’approved
.22 acre HC 75 -250*addition to residence . 56.3% (40.2% ex.)51.50%modified
.22 acre SC of 15%addition to residence 21.40%19.90%modified
.23 acre FS of 35’enclose porch 33.2’33.2’approved
.23 acre HC 75*-250*enclose porch 44.4% (existing)44.40%approved
.23 acre SC of 15%enclose porch 27.7% (26.8% ex.)27.70%approved
.238 acre ALS upper level deck 21’21’approved
.238 acre HC 75 -250'upper level deck 41% (41.6% ex.)41%approved
.238 acre SC of 15%upper level deck 20.4% (20.3% ex.)20.40%approved
.24 acre ALS addition to residence, deck expansion 28’ (35* ex.)28'approved
.24 acre HC 0'-75‘addition to residence, deck expansion 44.3% (51.9% ex.)44.30%approved
.24 acre SC of 15%addition to residence, deck expansion 20.3% (19.3% ex.)20.30%approved
.243 acre ALS new porch 26* (existing)26’approved
.243 acre HC 75*-250'new porch 45.5% (51.9% ex.)45.50%approved
.243 acre SC of 15%new porch 19.3% (existing)19.3’approved
.243 acre SS of 10 ’new porch 6.5* (existing)6.5’approved
.26 acre HC 75*-250*extend roof 48.83% (48.3% ex.) 48.83%approved
.275 acre HC 75'-250'replace deck, new residence 55% (existing)55%
V
approved
.363 acre SC of 15%new deck 16.8% (15.7% ex.)16.80%approved
.37 acre FS of 35*garage addition, retain gazebo, deck 20 ’tabled tabied
.39 acre ALT w/in 20* blu land alteration 17’17*approved
.39 acre LA of 1 acre land alteration .39 acre (existing).39 acre approved
.39 acre LW of 140*land alteration 100 ’ (existing)100 ’•approved
.4 acre LA of 1 acre replace accessory structure .4 acre (exisiting).4 acre •v' approved
.41 acre STS of 35'new garage 2.33*10 ’' modified
.439 acre ALS replace residence 54'54’approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B
1938 537 Park Lr> LR-1B
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B
2060 4055 Elm St LR-1B
1944 4055 Elm St LR-1B
1949 4455 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
2242 1225 Lakeview Ave LR-1B
1981 4620 Tonkaview Ln LR-1B
2030 995 Wildhurst Tr LR-1B
2030 995 Wildhurst Tr LR-1B
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-IB
2044 2775 Shadywood Rd LR-IB
2191 2780 Shadywood Rd LR-IB
2191 2780 Shadywood Rd LR-IB
1974 4685 North Shore Dr LR-IB
1974 4685 North Shore Dr LR-IB
2234 4215 N Shore Dr LR-IB
2234 4215 N Shore Dr LR-IB
2032 1375 Rest Point Rd LR-IB
2032 1375 Rest Point Rd LR-IB
2169 1185 Tonkawa Rd LR-IB
2169 1185 Tonkawa Rd LR-IB
2169 1185 Tonkawa Rd LR-IB
2243 4030 Dahl Rd LR-IB
2243 4030 Dahl Rd LR-IB
1988 2800 Shadywood Rd LR-IB
.439 acre
.439 acre
.439 acre
.439 acre
.44 acre
.44 acre
.44 acre
.44 acre
.44 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.465 acre
.469 acre
.47 acre
.53 acre
.53 acre
.56 acre
.56 acre
.56 acre
.56 acre
.6 acre
.62 acre
.62 acre
.66 acre
.66 acre
.664 acre
.664 acre
.7 acre
.7 acre
.749 acre
.749 acre
.749 acre
.87 acre
.87 acre
.89 acre
HC 0’-75*
LA of 1 acre
LW of 140*
STS of 15’
BFS of 30*
FS of 35*
HC 75*-250'
LA of 1 acre
LW of 140*
LA of 1 acre
LA of 1 acre
ALS
FS of 50*
FS of 35*
ALS
HC 75*-250 ‘
ALS
HC 0 -75*
LS of 75 ’
SC of 15%
HC 75 ’-250*
HC 0'-75*
HC 75 ’-250’
HC 0'-75 ‘
HC 75'-250*
LA of 1 acre
LW of 140*
FH of 3.5*
FS of 30*
ALS
HC 0’-75 ’
HC 75 ’-250'
HC 0’-75*
LS of 75*
LS of 75'
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
new residence
replace residence
new deck, new porch
garage addition
new residence
new deck
new deck
indoor spa
indoor spa
indoor spa
indoor spa
addition to residence
new accessory structure
new accessory structure
replace retaining wall
replace retaining wall
replace residence
replace residence
fence
fence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
replace, enclose deck
replace, enclose deck
fence
28.69%28.69%approved
.439 acre .439 acre approved
80'80'approved
4' and 6*4' and 6'approved
8' (13* ex.)8’approved
6* 113' ex.)6'approved
2.64%2.64%approved
.44 acre (existing).44 acre approved
10T (existing)101'approved
.46 acre (existing).46 acre approved
.46 acre (existing).46 acre approved
34'34'approved
34.06% (existing)34.06 approved
25’25'approved
6'6'approved
35.4% (36.1% ex.)35.40%approved
encroach denied denied
35.2% (35.4% ex.)denied denied
40'denied denied
16.7% (15.6% ex.)denied denied
31.7% (44% ex.)31.70%approved
7% (9.98% ex.)7.00%approved
29% (31.4% ex.)29%approved
15.5% (13.9% ex.)15.50%approved
59.4% (64.3% ex.)59.40%approved
.664 acre (existing).664 acre approved
90' (existing)90' ^approved
6.5'6.5'approved
0*O'approved
4' (1.5' ex.)4'approved
2.2% (4.4% ex.)2.20%approved
26.7% (existing)26.70%•approved
3.9% (exisiting)3.90%approved
65' (exisitng)65'approved
new fence new fence approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972233 1130 N Shore Dr W LR-1B .91 acre2233 1130 N Shore Or W LR-1B .91 acre
2237 1270 WildhurstTr LR-1B .96 acre
2038 1153 Elmwood Ave LR-1B ?
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B ?
1955 2702 Walters Port Ln LR-1B ?
2073 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B ?
2038 1153 Elmwood Ave LR-1B ?
2056 1035 Tonkawa Rd LR-1B ?
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B ?
2073 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B 7
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B 7
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B 7
2173 2675 Shadywood Rd LR-1B 7
2038 1153 Elmwood Ave LR-1B ?
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B 7
2073 2709 Waiters Port Ln LR-1B 7
2073 2709 Waiters Port Ln LR-1B ?
2073 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B 7
1966 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 7
1966 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
2146 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
2146 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 7
2146 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B 7
1941 3135 North Shore Dr LR-1B 1 acre
2061 3135 North Shore Dr LR-1B 1 acre
1941 3135 North Shore Dr LR-1B 1 acre
2185 1580 Bohns Point Rd LR-1B 1 acre
2061 3135 North Shore Dr LR-1B 1 acre
HTOAS
HC 75*-250*
ALS
FS of 30 ’
FS of 35’
HC 0 ’-75’
HC 0 ’-75’
HC 0 ’-75*
HC 75’-250 ’
HC 75*-250’
HT
SC of 15%
SEP of 10 ’
SS of 10'
STS of 15’
ALS
LS of 75'
SC of 15%
HC 0'-75 ‘
LS of 75’
ALS
AlS
HC 0'-75*
HC 0 ’-75*
HC 75'-250*
LA of 1 acre
LS of 75'
LW of 140*
SS of 10 ’
ALS
HC 0'-75*
HC 0'-75'
HC 75'-250'
LS of 75'
new accessory structure new accessory structure
replace deck
addition to residence
replace accesssory structure
new porch
repi ret wl, wik, rep dr, new prch, deck
addition to residence
replace retaining wail
replace accesssory structure
repI ret wi, wIk, rep dr, new prch. deck
replace accesssory structure
replace accesssory structure
garage addition, retain gazebo, deck
addition to residence
replace accesssory structure
repi ret wl, wik, rep dr, new prch, deck
repi ret wl, wik, rep dr, new prch, deck
repi ret wl, wik, rep dr. new prch, deck
replace retaining wall, new indoor spa
replace retaining wall, new indoor spa
replace residence
addition to res, addition over res
replace residence
addition to res, addition over res
addition to res, addition over res
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
replace residence
addition to residence
replace residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
replace residence
30 ’30'approved1,200 sq ft 1,000 sq ft modified
49.47% (existing)49.47%approved
32* (30 ’ ex.)32'approved
24'24'approved
34* (existing)34'approved
49.6% (existing)49.60%approved
51% (52% ex.)51'approved
3.70%3.70%approved
40.8% (38.1% ex.)40.80%approved
74.20%74.20%approved
23* (19* ex.)23'approved
10.00%10%approved
5'5'approved
9.3*9.3’approved
3*3’approved
encroach denied denied
19’denied denied
16% (15.1% ex.)15.10%modified
encroach (existing)tabled tabled
< 7% 07% ex.)tabled tabled
encroach withdrawn withdrawn
encroach withdrawn withdrawn
33.56 withdrawn withdrawn
9.1% (9.01 ex.)withdrawn withdrawn
30.6% (32.1% ex.)withdrawn withdrawn
7 withdrawn withdrawn
7 withdrawn withdrawn
47’withdrawn withdrawn
7 withdrawn withdrawn
27' (existing)27’approved
45'. 48'45’, 48’•approved
10.7% (12.3% ex.)10.70%approved
27.18% (existing)27.18%approved
10.7% (12.3% ex.)10.70%approved
PW'-"” 'll'«VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997219221922040
2040
2011
2011
2050
2050
2100
2106
1977
1936
2003
2003
1331 North Arm Dr 1331 North Arm Dr
2601 W Lafayette Rd
2601 W Lafayette Rd
4415 Forest Lake Landin
4415 Forest Lake Landin
3165 North Shore Dr
3165 North Shore Dr
1030 Tonkawa Rd
2605 Kelly Ave
980 Tonkawa Rd
2525 Kelly Ave
975 Tonkawa Rd
975 Tonkawa Rd
LR-1B Count
LR-1B LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
LR-1B
119
1.13 acres 1.13 acres 1.37 acres
1.37 acres
1.4 acres
1.4 acres
1.43 acres
1.43 acres
1.56 acres
1.68 acres
1.7 acres
2 acres
2.3 acres
2.3 acres
HC 0’-75* LW of 140* HC 0*-75’
LS of 75*
HT
HT
ALS
HC 75‘-250‘
LW of 140’
SS of 10’
ALS
ALS
ALS
HC 75’-250’
new residence, guest house (ex)new residence, guest house (ex)swimmir>g pool, patio
swimming pool, patio
addition over residence
addition over residence
swimming pool
swimming pool
replace residence
remodel guest house
replace residence
addition to residence
new deck, porch, addition to residence
new deck, porch, addition to residence
4.62% (existing)4.62%approved74.89* (existing)74.89*approved8.1% (8.86% ex.)8.10%approved
24*24*approved
35*35*approved
29.20%29.20%approved
15*15*approved
32.60%32.60%approved
101* (existing)101*approved
3.1* (existing)3.1*approved
97*97*approved
33*33*approved
23*23*approved
33% (32.49% ex.)33%approved
2207
2207
2207
2207
1953
1953
1953
2017
2017
2017
2017
2097
2097
2097
2097
2034
2034
1950
1950
2074
3339 Crystal Bay Rd
3339 Crystal Bay Rd
3339 Crystal Bay Rd
3339 Crystal Bay Rd
3475 Livingston Ave
3475 Livingston Ave
3475 Livingston Ave
1905 Fagerness Pt Rd
1905 Fageriiess Pt Rd
1905 Fagerness Pt Rd
1905 Fagerness Pt Rd
3315 Crystal Bay Rd
3315 Crystal Bay Rd
3315 Crystal Bay Rd
3315 Crystal Bay Rd
1400 Cherry PI
1400 Cherry PI
3685 North Shore Dr
3685 North Shore Dr
1687 Concordia St
LR-1C .15 acre ALS dormer over garage 15*15*approved
LR-1C .15 acre HC 0*-75*dormer over garage 43.37% (existing)43.37%approved
LR-IC .15 acre HC 75*-250*dormer over garage 47.67% (existing)47.67%approved
LR-1C .15 acre LS of 75*dormer over garage 45* (existing)45*approved
LR-IC .15 acre SC of 15%addition to residence, new deck 20%20%approved
LR-IC .15 acre SEP of 10*eddition to residence, new deck 3*3*approved
LR-IC .15 acre SS of 10*eddition to residence, new deck 6* (existing)6*approved
LR-IC .23 acre FS of 30*addition to residence 23* (existing)23*approved
LR-IC .23 acre HC 75*-250*addition to residence 31.97% (49.87% ex 31.97%approved
LR-IC .23 acre SC of 15%addition to residence 23% (26.5% ex.)23%approved
LR-IC .23 acre SS of 10*addition to residence 8.3* (7* ex.)8.3*approved
LR-IC .253 acre ALS replace deck 7* (existing)7*approved
LR-IC .253 acre HC 0*-75*garage repairs 32.2% (34.4% ex.)32.20%approved
LR-IC .253 acre LS of 75*garage repairs 38* (existing)38*approved
LR-IC .253 acre RS of 30*replace deck 19’ (9* ex.)19*approved
LR-IC .26 acre HC 75*-250*new deck 49.6% (49.2% ex.)49.60%approved
LR-IC .26 acre SC of 15%new deck 19.9% (17.6% ex.)19.90%.approved
• l
LR-IC .267 acre HC 0*-75*attached garage, addition to residence 26.7% (21.4% ex.)22.20%* • modified
LR-IC .267 acre LS of 75*attached garage, addition to residence 41* (31* ex.)52*modified
LR-IC .3 acre HC 0*-75*new retaining wall, repair garage 24.2% (existing)24.20%- • •
approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972214 2016 Shadywood Rd LR-1C2214 2016 Shadywood Rd LR-1C2214 2016 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
2149 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
2009 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
2009 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
2009 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
2033 1670 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
2033 1670 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
2033 1670 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2033 1670 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2180 2920 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
2180 2920 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
2180 2920 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
2219 2874 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
2219 2874 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
1987 2705 Ethel Ave LR-1C
2227 3466 Ivy PI LR-IC
2227 3466 Ivy PI LR-IC
2227 3466 Ivy PI LR-IC
2027 3753 Casco Ave LR-IC
2230 2184 Shadywood Rd LR-IC
2230 2184 Shadywood Rd LR-IC
2095 3855 Cherry Ln LR-IC
1984 3855 Cherry Ave LR-IC
2134 1810 Shadywood Rd LR-IC
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-IC
.314 acre .314 acre .314 acre
.316 acre
.316 acre
.316 acre
.316 acre
.316 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.32 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.33 acre
.337 acre
.337 acre
.344 acre
.356 acre
.356 acre
.356 acre
.36 acre
.367 acre
.367 acre
.37 acre
.37 acre
.41 acre
.46 acre
HC 75*-250* SS of 10’SC of 15%
ALS
SS of 30*
HC 75’-250 ’
SC of 15%
SS of 10’
ALS
HC 0’-75‘
HC 0 -75’
HC 75’-250 ’
LS of 75’
LS of 75*
HC 75’-250 ’
HC 75’-250 ’
SC of 15%
SEP of 10’
SS of 10'
SS of 30’
HC 75’-250 ’
SC of 15%
FS of 30’
IFPS
SS of 10’
ALS
HC 75’-250 ’
SS of 10’
LA of .5 acre
HC 75’-250 ’
SS of 10’
LA of .5 acre
LA of .5 acre
HC 0’-75’
ALS
expand roof, new deck, addition to res 49.16% (45.65 ex.) 49.16% expand roof, new deck, addition to res 7’ expand roof, new deck, addition to res 20.67%
new screen porch
new accessory structure, new deck
new accessory structure, new deck
new accessory structure, new deck
new accessory structure, new deck
addition over residence
replace accesory structure, deck
addition over residence
replace accesory structure, deck
replace accesory structure, deck
addition over residence
addition over residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
attached garage, addition to residence
attached garage, addition to residence
attached garage, addition to residence
new residence, relocate acc. struc.
new residence, relocate acc. struc.
new porch
extend roof, new deck
extend roof, new deck
extend roof, new deck
replace residence
7’19.63%
ir
18’
28.50%
15.60%
8’
10’
18.20%
28%
35.80%
50’
39'
32.10%
11’
18’
32.80%
15.70%
2 ’ and 8’
10’ (existing)
18.2% (28% ex.)
28% (existing)
35.8% (33% ex.)
50’
39’ (existing)
33% (existing)
40.8% (51.6% ex.) 40.80%
19% 19%
3.3’ 3.3’
6 ’, 2.6, 3.5" (8". 3. 6 ’. 2.6 ’, 3.
8 ’ 8 ’
39.60% 39%
18.40% 17.10%
20 ’ from front line 20 ’
3’ front forward of p 3’
6 ’ (4.7’ ex.) 6 ’
20 ’ (8’ existing) 20 ’
34.3% (32.26% ex.) 34.3Q%
8’ 8’
.36 acre (existing) .36 acre
addition to residence, stair improvement 25.8% (25.01% ex.) 25.80%
addition to residence, stair improvement 6.6’ (8.9’ ex.) 6.6’
new residence .37 acre (existing) .37 acre,
new residence .37 acre (existing) .37 acre '
new deck 41.7% (43.5% ex.) 41.70%
replace accessory structure approval approved
approvedapprovedmodified
approved
approved
modified
modified
modified
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
modified
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
modified
modified
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
8
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C
1954 2879 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2023 3131 Casco Cir LR-1C
2220 1950 Concordia St LR-1C
2151 2795 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2151 2795 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2008 3133 Casco Cir LR-1C
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2210 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2210 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
.533 acre
.533 acre
.533 acre
.533 acre
.534 acre
.534 acre
.534 acre
.534 acre
.534 acre
.534 acre
.54 acre
.57 acre
.58 acre
.72 acre
.72 acre
.758 acre
.77 acre
.77 acre
.77 acre
.77 acre
.776 acre
.776 acre
ALS
HC 250‘-500’
HC 250’-500'
HC 75*-250’
LA of .5 acre
LA of .5 acre
LWof 100’
LW of 100’
SS of 10’
SS of 10’
HC 0’-75 ’
LS of 75 ’
HC 75 ’-250’
ALS
HC 0’-75 ’
LS of 75 ’
LS of 75 ’
ALS
HC 0’-75 ’
HC 75 ’-250’
LW of 100’
SC of 15%
SS of 10’
LS of 75 ’
HC 75 ’-250’
ALS
ALS
HC 250’-500’
HC 75 ’-250’
ALS
HC 0’-75*
HC 75 ’-250’
LS of 75 ’
ALS
HC 0’-75 ’
replace residence, accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace accessory structure
replace accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace accessory structure
replace accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structure
extend, realign, and replace roof
extend, realign, and replace roof
extend, realign, and replace roof
extend, realign, and replace roof
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat house
fence
new sidewalk, new drive
new residence, relocate acc. struc.
replace residence
replace residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
remodel residence
remodel residence
encroach encroach approved
60%60%approved
60%60%approved
35%35%approved
.46 acre (existing).46 acre approved
.46 acre (existing).46 acre approved
75 ’ (existing)75 ’approved
75* (existing)75 ’approved
9.50%9.5 approved
9.5' (1.6* ex.)9.5 ’approved
10.10%denied denied
65' (23 ’ ex.)denied denied
31% (39% ex.)35’modified
22.6 ’22.6 ’approved
6.8% (existing)6.80%approved
63' (existing)63’approved
69* (existing)69 ’approved
29 ’ encroachment denied denied
7.14%denied denied
32.98% (27.59% ax denied denied
90 ’denied denied
0.2362 (18.09 ex.)denied denied
0' (driveway)denied denied
5’6’approved
42.9% (existing)42.90%approved
8*8’approved
24 ’24 ’ .approved
38.90%38.90%approved
27.1% (29.5% ex.)27.10%approved
46.5’46.5’approved
2.9% (existing)2.90%approved
46.2% (existing)46.20%.approved• |
65' (58.5’ ex.)65’’* approved
50’50’approved
2.7% (2.93% ex.)2.70% •approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972210 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C1999 2475 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1999 2475 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1979 1890 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
1979 1890 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
1979 1890 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
1979 1890 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2163 1825 Concordia St LR-1C
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
2160 3225 Casco Cir LR-1C
2222 2925 Casco Pt Rd LR-1C
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
2112 2765 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
1965 2525 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
1964 2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1964 2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1964 2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
2160 3225 Casco Cir LR-1C
1965 2525 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C
1952 2240 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2118 3546 Ivy R LR-1C
2167 2540 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
1972 3593 Crystal R LR-1C
LR-1 C Count 122
.776 acre .81 acre
.81 acre
.87 acre
.87 acre
.87 acre
.87 acre
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
1 acre
2 acres
LS of 75'ALT in 0 ’-75‘
HC 0 -75*
ALS
HC 0 ’-75*
HC 75*-250*
LS of 75’
ALS
ALS
FS of 30'
HC 0 -75’
HC 75’-250*
HC 75'-250’
LS of 75’
LS of 75‘
RS of 30*
SC of 15%
SIGN height of 8*
SIGN of 24 sq. ft
SIGN of 24 sq. ft
SS of 10*
SS of 10*
STS of 15*
HC 0*-75*
HC 250*-500*
ALS
HC 0*-75*
LS of 75*
SS of 10*
HC 0*-75*
HC 75*-250*
FS of 30*
remodel residence replace stairs
replace stairs
replace deck
replace deck
replace deck
replace deck
new deck, replace residence
replace residence, deck
garage addition
retaining wall
relocate accessory structure
replace deck
replace retaining wall
replace residence, deck
relocate accessory structure
relocate accessory structure
sign
sign
sign
replace residence, deck
relocate accessory structure
garage addition
replace retaining wall
driveway
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence
addition to residence, retaining wall
replace deck, new residence
new porch
58* (existing)25 cu. yd.
5.55% (8.6% ex.)
14*
4% (2.02% ex.)
29.05%
71*
12*
encroach
.2* (exisitng)
8.6% (4.8% ex.)
52% (47% ex.)
44.70%
encroach
65* (existing)
0*
19.10%
9*
48 sq. ft.
148 sq. ft. (103 sq.
7.3* (existing)
0*
4.4' (existing)
5.5% (2.5% ex.)
56.4% (existing)
encroach
39.02% (existing)
33'
1.5* (existing)
25.60%
32%
18*
58*25 cu. yd.
5.55%
14*
0.40%
29.05%
71*
12'
encroach
.2*
8.60%
52%
44.70%
encroach
65'
O'
19.10%
9’
48 sq. ft.
148 sq. ft.
7.3'
O'
4.4*
5.20%
54.60%
tabled
tabled.
tabled
tabled
withdrawn
25%
18'
approvedapproved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
approved
modified
modified
tabled
tabled
tabled
tabled
withdrawn
modified
approved
2113 129 Chevy Chase Dr R-1A
2177 2005 Sugarwood Or R-1A
.678 acre
1 acre
SS of 10*
SS of 30 ’
garage addition
realign driveway
7.95*
allow curvature
withdrawn
approved
withdrawn
approved
VARIANCE REaUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972177
2177
2005 Sugarwood Dr
2005 Sugarwood Dr
R-1A Count
R-1A
R-1A
1 acre
1 acre
SS of 30 ’
SS of 30*
realign driveway
realign driveway
allow filling
ir
denied
25*
denied
modified
1956
2068
2068
1956
2080
2080
1951
2069
2089
2089
1939
2015
2015
2012
4040 Watertown Rd
4040 Watertown Rd
4040 Watertown Rd
4040 Watertown Rd
4045 Watertown Rd
4045 Watertown Rd
50 Christofori Cir
3850 Watertown Rd
4520 Watertown Rd
4520 Watertown Rd
425 Turnham Rd
4080 Bayside Rd
4080 Bayside Rd
4100 Watertown Rd
RR*1A Count
RR-IA
RR-1A
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
RR-IA
14
1.28 acres
1.28 acres
1.28 acres
1.28 acres
10 acres
10 acres
23 acres
25 acres
3.6 acres
3.6 acres
3.8 acres
5 acres
5 acres
9 acres
FS of 100 ’
RS of 50*
SS of 100 ’
SS of 50 ’
FS of 100 ’
SS of 50 ’
SS of 50*
IFPS
LA of 5 acres
LW of 300 ’
IFPS
FS of 100 ’
HT
LA of 3 acres
replace residence
gar addn, addn to res, porch addn
gar addn, addn to res, porch addn
replace residence
replace accessory structure
replace accessory structure
addition to residence, new deck, stairs
swimming pool
new residence
new residence
new accessory structure
addition to residence
addition to residence
horses
100 ’100 ’approved
32’32’approved
25.7’25.7*approved
45’45*approved
52’ (50.4 ’ ex.)52‘approved
26’ (47’ ex.)26*approved
31.4’31.4’approved
500 ’ from road 500'approved
3.6’3.6’approved
237.56’287.56’approved
approval approval approved
64.75’64.75’approved
32.5’32.5’approved
12 horses tabled tabled
i
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B .126 acre RS of 50 ’new porch 10 ’10 ’approved
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B .126 acre SC of 15%new porch 32% (existing)32%approved
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B .126 acre SS of 30 ’new porch 12.3’12.3’approved
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B .16 acre RS of 50*addition over residence 29’ (existing)29*approved
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B .16 acre SEP of 10 ’addition over residence 3’ (existing)3’approved
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B .16 acre SS of 30 ’addition over residence 18 ’ (existing)18*approved
2141 1251 Briar St RR-1B .241 acre SS of 10 ’new accessory structure 2’ (1.8 ’ ex.)2’approved
2045 1155 Brown Rd S RR-1B .46 acre FS of 50 ’addition to residence 2’2’approved
2045 1155 Brown Rd S RR-1B .46 acre STS of 50 ’addition to residence 48.8 ’48.8 ’ ^approved
2079 440 Willow Dr S RR-1B .63 acre IFPS garage addition 55’55’approved
2079 440 Willow Dr S RR-1B .63 acre STS of 15’garage addition 6.4’ (5.2’ ex.)6.4’approved
2079 440 Willow Dr S RR-1B .63 acre OAS garage addition 1,077.09 sq. ft.440 sq. ft.modified
1969 1355 Brown Rd S RR-1B ?FS of 50 ’parking lot encroach encroach ■approved
1963 15 Orono Orchard S RR-1B ?LW of 200 ’replace residence, deck 80 ’80*approved
2249 2245 French Lake Rd RR-1B ?OHW setback of new septic 97’97’approved
2249 2245 French Lake Rd RR-1B ?SS of 20 ’new septic 10 ’10 ’•approved
2067 625 Old Long Lake Rd RR-1B ?SS of 30 ’replace attached garage 23.4’ (23.7’ ex.)23.4’«approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT AREA; JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 19972016Webber Hills Rd RR-1B2016Webber Hills Rd RR-1B22152580 Fox St RR-1B
2228 253 Cygnet PI RR-1B
2228 253 Cygnet PI RR-1B
2228 253 Cygnet PI RR-1B
2046 405 North Arm Dr RR-1B
2046 405 North Arm Dr RR-1B
2042 1233 Briar St RR-1B
2124 2165 Colin Dr RR-1B
2124 2165 Colin Dr RR-1B
2042 1233 Briar St RR-1B
1937 2725 Rainey Rd RR-1B
1937 2725 Rainey Rd RR-1B
2055 2800 Cntryside, 2425 Th RR-1B
2055 2800 Cntryside, 2425 Th RR-1B
2055 2800 Cntryside, 2425 Th RR-1B
2232 2439 Sherwood Hills RR-1B
2184 1920 6th Ave N RR-1B
2153 3105 6th Ave N RR-1B
2153 3105 6th Ave N RR-1B
2110 2465 French Lake Rd RR-1B
2026 875 Wayzata Blvd RR-1B
2026 875 Wayzata Blvd RR-1B
RR'IB Count 41
??
?
1.07 acre
1.07 acre
1.07 acre
130 acres
130 acres
2 acres
2 acres
2 acres
2 acres
2 acres
2 acres
2 acres ea
2 acres ea
2 acres ea
2.291 acre
3 acres
3.92 acres
3.92 acres
6.8 acres
7 acres
7 acres
FS of 50*SS of 30*
tFPS
FS of ro*
HC 7o
SS of 30’
OAS > 3,000 sq
SC of 15%
ALS
FS of 50*
IFPS
LS of 150‘
RS of 30*
SS of 30'
FS of 50*
SIGN height of 8'
SIGN of 6 sq. ft.
SS of 30'
IFPS
IFPS
OAS
LS of 150'
SIGN height of 8'
SIGN of 12 sq. ft
garage additiongarage addition
relocate accessory structure
garage addition
garage addition
garage addition
!•«. • accessory structure
new accessory structure
replace deck
new accessory structure
new accessory structure
replace deck
tennis court
tennis court
monument
monument
monument
addition to residence
remodel residence
new acc. struc.
new acc. struc.
new porch, addition to residence
sign
sign
33' (27' ex.)tabled tabled20'tabled tabled
80'withdrawn withdrawn
41* (existing)41'approved
25.90%25.90%approved
16.4' (31' ex.)16.4'approved
approval approval approved
16.30%16.30%approved
3'3*approved
12'12'approved
48'48*approved
131' (137' ex.)131'approved
10'10'approved
10'10'approved
40', 13', 17'withdrawn withdrawn
11'withdrawn withdrawn
20 sq. ft.withdrawn withdrawn
18.6' (existing)18.6'approved
150'150*approved
15'15'approved
1,260 sq. ft.1,260 sq. f approved
86' (71.6* ex.)86'approved
13.6'13.6'approved
50 sq. ft.50 sq. ft.approved
Qrand Cotmt 401
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997fMf Address Zoning Lot Area Type of Variance Specific Project Requested Approved Result.15 acre ALS dormer over garage 15*15'approved.22 acre ALS addition to residence 68.6' (existing)68.6'approved
.238 acre ALS upper level deck 21*21*approved
.24 acre ALS addition to residence, deck expansion 28' (35' ex.)28'approved
.243 acre ALS new porch 26* (existing)26'approved
.253 acre ALS replace deck 7' (existing)7*approved
.316 acre ALS new screen porch 11'ir approved
.32 acre ALS addition over residence 10' (existing)10'approved
.356 acre ALS extend roof, new deck 20' (8' existing)20'approved
.439 acre ALS replace residence 54'54*approved
.46 acre ALS replace accessory structure approval approved approved
.46 acre ALS replace residence, accessory structure encroach encroach approved
.465 acre ALS new deck, new porch 34'34'approved
.53 acr'^ALS new deck 6’6*approved
.533 acre ALS extend, realign, and replace roof 22.6'22.8'approved
.58 acre ALS new residence, relocate acc. struc.8*8'approved
.72 acre ALS replace residence 24*24*approved
.749 acre ALS addition to residence 4' (1.5' ex.)4'approved
.77 acre ALS addition to residence 46.5'46.5 ’approved
.776 acre ALS remodel residence 50'50'approved
.87 acre ALv.replace deck 14'14'approved
.878 acre ALS addition to residence encroach encroach approved
.88 acre ALS replace residence 19'19*approved
?ALS rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad 13'13*epproved
?ALS addition to residence 32' (30* ex.)32'approved
?ALS new deck, replace residence 12'12' .approved
?ALS replace residence, deck encroach encroach approved
1 acre ALS addition to residence 27' (existing)27'approved
1.43 acres ALS swimming pool 15*15*approved
1.7 acres ALS replace residence 97*97*
e
approved
2 acres ALS addition to lesidence 33'33'•approved
2 acres ALS replace deck 3'3*approved
2.11 acres ALS addition to residence 23'23*approved
2.3 acres ALS new deck, porch, addition to residence23*23'approved
2207 3339 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B
2131 4149 Highwood Rd LR-1B
1994 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
2097 3315 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
2149 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C
2227 3466 Ivy PI LR-1C
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
2067 1745 Concordia St LR-1C
1949 4455 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
2030 995 Wildhurst Tr LR-1B
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C
2220 1950 Concordia St LR-1C
2151 2795 Casco Point Rd LR-1C
2169 1185 Tonkawa Rd LR-1B
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
2210 3229 Casco Cir LR-1C
1979 1890 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2091 1065 Ferndale Rd W LR-1 A
2104 1065 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A
2066 1487 Shoreline Dr LR-1 A
2038 1153 Elmwood Ave LR-1 B
2163 1825 Concordia St LR-1C
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C
1941 3135 North Shore Or LR-1B
2050 3165 North Shore Dr LR-1B
1977 980 Tonkawa Rd LR-1B
1936 2525 Kelly Ave LR-1B
2042 1233 Briar St RR-1B
2142 2525 North Shore Dr LR-1 A
2003 975 Tonkawa Rd LR-1B
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-1C .534 acre ALS
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B .56 acre ALS
2073 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B ?ALS
1973 1509 Long Lake Blvd LR-IA .383 acre ALS
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-1C ?ALS
2162 3115 North Shore Dr LR-1B ?ALS
2146 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B ?ALS
ALS Count
1999 2475 Dunwoody Ave LR-1C .81 acre ALT in 0'-75’
2071 1420 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-IA ?ALT in 0’-75'
1966 3500 Bayside Rd LR-IA 1.97 acre ALT in 0’-75’
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres ALT in 0’-75’
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997repair res, pool, new deck, boat house 29' encroachment
indoor spa encroach
repi ret wl, wik, rep dr, new prch, deck encroach
replace accessory structure, new deck 61 ’ (72* ex.)
addition to residence encroach
replace residence encroach
addition to res, addition over res encroach
denied
denied
denied
tabled
tabled
withdrawn
withdrawn
denied
denied
denied
tabled
tabled
withdrawn
withdrawn
ALT in 0'-75' Count
replace stairs
replace retaining wall
new residence, retaining wall, drivewa
alteration for parking, bluff alteration
25 cu. yd.
approval
approval
5,000 cu yd
25 cu. yd. approved
approved approved
approved approved
denied denied
4
2125 4760 North Shore Dr LR-1B
ALT w/in 20' Muff zone Count
.39 acre ALT w/in 20 ’bluf land alteration
1
17’17*approved
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B
1968 3500 Bayside Rd LR-1A
1973 1509 Long Lake Blvd LR-1A
BF8 of 30' Count
.44 acre
1.97 acre
.383 acre
BPS of 30 ’
BPS of 30 ’
BPS of 30 ’
replace residence
new residence, retaining wall, drivewa
replace accessory structure, new deck
8’ (13 ’ «x.)
approvai
15 ’
8' approved
approved approved
tabled tabled
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr
BS In O'-75' Count
B-2 .33 acres BS in 0’-75’repI see strijc, exp parking, exp pond on parking lot on grass modified
1
1968 3500 Bayside Rd
2196 1449 Shoreline Dr
CV In 0'-75' Count
LR-IA
B-2
1.97 acre
.33 acres
CV in 0'-75’
CV in 0’-7b’
new residence, retaining wall, drivewa
alteration for parking, bluff alteration
replanting
removing 6" trees
replanting approved
denied denied
2032 1375 Rest Point Rd
FH of 3.5' Count
LR-1B .7 acre PH of 3.5'fence 6.5 ’6.5 ’approved
1956 4040 Watertown Rd
2080 4045 Watertown Rd
2015 4080 Bayside Rd
FS of 100' Count
RR-IA
RR-1A
RR-IA
1.28 acres
10 acres
5 acres
PS of 100’
PS of 100'
FS of 100’
replace residence
replace accessory structure
addition to residence
100’
52 ’ (50.4’ ex.)
64.75 ’
100’^ approved
52' approved
64.75' approved
2017 1905 Pagerness Pt Rd LR-IC .23 acre FS of 30 ’addition to residence 23 ’ (existing)23 ’approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres FS of 30 ’repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 17’17’
•
approved
2219 2874 Casco Pt Rd LR-IC .337 acre FS of 30 ’new residence, relocate acc. struc.20 ’ from front line 20'
’ •!
approved
2032 1375 Rost Point Rd LR-1B .7 acre FS of 30'fence 0’0’approved
1947 1955 Shoreline Dr B-2 ?FS of 30 ’relocate accessory structure 10'10’approved
4 •.
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 199<^ TO JUNE 19971947
2161
2160
1972
1955 Shoreline Or
4105 High wood Rd
3225 Casco Cir
3593 Crystal PI
FS of 30' Count
B-2
LR-1B
LR-1C
LR-1C
?
?
?
2 acres
FS of 30'
FS of 30*
FS of 30*
FS of 30'
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B .156 acre FS of 35'
2188 1570 North Arm Dr LR-1B .158 acre FS of 35’
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B .22 acre FS of 35’
2138 630 Park Ln LR-1B .23 acre FS of 35’
1938 537 Park Ln LR-1B .44 acre FS of 35'
1981 4620 Tonkaview Ln LR-1B .47 acre FS of 35*
1955 2702 Waiters Port Ln LR-1B ?FS of 35*
2175 4784 North Shore Dr
FS of 35' Count
LR-1B .37 acre FS of 35'
2088 3770 Bayside Rd LR-1A .46 acre FS of 50’
2045 1155 Brown Rd S RR-1B .46 acre FS of 50’
2242 1225 Lakeview Ave LR-1B .469 acre FS of 50'
2140 1490 Long Lake Blvd LR-1A .744 acre FS of 50’
1969 1355 Brown Rd S RR-1B ?FS of 50'
2228 253 Cygnet PI RR-1B 1.07 acre FS of 50'
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A 1.94 acre FS of 50’
2124 2165 Colin Dr RR-1B 2 acres FS of 50'
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre FS of 50’
2016 Webber Hills Rd RR-1B ?FS of 50’
2055 2800 Cntryside, 2425 Th RR-1B
FS of 50' Count
2 acres each FS of 50’
2207 3339 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C .15 acre HC 0’-75’
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B . 156 acre HC 0’-75’
2097 3315 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C .253 acre HC 0'-75’
2074 1687 C''ncordia St LR-1C .3 acre HC 0’-75'
2009 1685 Concordia St LR-1C .32 acre HC 0'-75’
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-1C .32 acre HC 0’-75’
2134 1810 Shady wood Rd LR-1C .41 acre HC 0'-75’
2221 3115 N Shore Dr LR-1B .439 acre HC 0’-75’
2144 3546 Ivy Pi LR-1C .533 acre HC 0’-75’
relocate accessory stri cture
replace accesssory structure
garage addition
new porch
10'10*
24 24'
.2' (exisitng).2'
18'18’
replace residence, accessory structure 13' (5.3' ex.)
new accessory structure
addition to residence
enclose porch
replace residence
new residence
new porch
garage addition, retain gazebo, deck
32' (34,5' ex.)
20.9' (existing)
33.2'
6' (13* ex.)
25'
34' (existing)
20'
8
remodel residence, addition to residenc 45'
addition to residence
garage addition
addition to residence, extend roof
parking lot
garage addition
replace residence
new accessory structure
replace residence
garage addition
monument
dormer over garage
replace residence, accessory structure
garage repairs
new retaining wall, repair garage
replace accesory structure, deck
addition over residence
new deck
replace residence
e' tend, realign, and replace roof
45’45’approved
2 ’2'approved
34.06% (existing)34.06 approved
30' (35.1' ex.)30'approved
encroach encroach approved
41' (existing)41'approved
43' (46* ex.)43'approved
12'12'approved
44.5’37.5'modified
33’ (27' ex.)tabled tabied
40', 13', 17'withdrawn withdrawn
43.37% (existing)43.37%approved
17.8% (25% ex.)17.8'approved
32.2% (34.4% ex.)32.20%approved
24.2% (existing)24.20%approved
18.2% (28% ex.)18.20%approved
28% (existing)28%• |approved
41.7% (43.5% ex.)41.70% - •approved
28.69%28.69%approved
6.8% (existing)6.80%approved
2222
2061
1941
2192
2133
2040
2105
1968
1992
2196
2195
2057
2216
2137
1997
2083
1950
1965
2142
1973
'80 Sh 185 No
85 To
29 Ca
129 Ca
75 Du
130 Da
190 Sh
75 Ba’
65 Eat
87 Sh.
00 Bra
09 Wa
53 Elnr
35TOI
2925 Cai
3135 Noi
3135 Noi
1331 Noi
1385 Ore
2601 W I
1101 Wl
3500 Ba\
1400 Bra
1449 She
1449 She
1745 Cor
3195 Cas
2709 Wa
1101 Wl
1535 Lon
3685 Nor
2525 Dur
2525 Nor
1509 Lon
13*approved
32*approved
20.9‘approved
33.2'approved
B*approved
25’approved
34*approved
tabled tabled
»5’approved
2’approved
34.06 approved
30‘approved
sncroach approved
approved
W approved
12*approved
37.5'modified
tabled tabled
withdrawn withdrawn
2088 3770 Bayside Rd LRIA .46 acre HC 250*-500 ’
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-1C .46 acre HC 250'-500*
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-1C .46 acre HC 250'-500'
2151 2795 Casco Point Rd LR-1C .72 acre HC 250*-500'
2200 2435 N Shore Dr LR-1A 1.3 acres HC 250 ’-500*
1952 2240 Shadywood Rd LR-1C ?HC 250 ’-500 ’
46.2% (existing)46.20%approved26.7% (existing)26.70%approved29.05%29.05%approved
38.9% (42.3% ex.)38.90%approved
49.47% (existing)49.47%approved
83.6% (existing)83.60%approved
40.8% (38.1% ex.)40.80%approved
74.20%74.20%approved
52% (47% ex.)52%approved
44.70%44.70%approved
29 8% (29.6% ex.)29.80%approved
27.18% (existing)27.18%approved
25.90%25.90%approved
32.60%32.60%approved
67.86% (100% ex.)67.86%approved
33% (32.49% ex.)33%approved
53.57%denied denied
32.98% (27.59% ex denied denied
28.80%denied denied
35%denied denied
67.86%61.08%modified
87.35% (existing)83.70%modified
56.3% (40.2% ex.)51.50%modified
32.80%28.50%modified
33% (existing)32.10%modified
39.60%39%modified
31% (39% ex.)35* .modified
32%25%modified
33.80%tabled tabled
30.6% (32.1% ex.)withdrawn withdrawn
26.7% (existing)26.70%
•
approved
30’30'approved
23’ (19* ex.)23’approved
35’35'
t
approved
t6.20%approved►6.70%approved(9.05%approved18.90%approved
^9.47%approved
13.60%approved
10.80%approved
^4.20%approveii
>2%approved
14.70%approved
29.80%approved
27.18%approved
25.90%approved
32.60%approved
57.86%approved
33%approved
denied denied
denied denied
denied denied
denied denied
51.08%modified
53.70%modified
51.50%modified
28.50%modified
32.10%modified
39%modified
35 ‘ V modified
25%modified
tabied tabled
withdrawn withdrawn
26.70%
•
approved
30 ’ •• ’ •approved
23 ’approved
35*
f «.
approved
2207 3339 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC .15 acre LS of 75'dormer over garage 45' (existing)45’approved
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B .156 acre LS of 7o*replace residence, accessory structure 28.5' (22' ex.)28.5 ’approved
2097 3315 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC .253 acre LS of 75*garage repairs 38' (existing)38 ’approved
2009 1685 Concordia St LR-IC .32 acre LS of 75 ’replace accesory structure, deck 50’50’epproved
1983 1685 Concordia St LR-IC .32 acre LS of 75'addition over residence 39' (existing)39 ’approved
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres LS of 75*repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 47’47'approved
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-IC .533 acre LS of 75*extend, realign, and replace roof 63* (existing)63*approved
2144 3546 Ivy PI LR-1C .533 acre LS of 75*extend, realign, and replace roof 69' (existing)69'approved
1954 2879 Casco Point Rd LR-IC .54 acre LS of 75*fence 5 ’5'epproved
2150 3229 Casco Cir LR-IC .77 acre LS of 75'addition to residence 65’ (58.5’ ex.)65'approved
2210 3229 Casco Cir LR-IC .776 acre LS of 75*remodel residence 58' (existing)58'approved
2117 1473 Bay Ridge Rd LR-IA .824 acre LS of 75'addition to residence, retaining wall 69*69'approved
2243 4030 Dahl Rd LR-1B .87 acre LS of 75'replace, enclose deck 65' (exisitng)65'approved
1979 1890 Shady wood Rd LR-IC .87 acre LS of 75 ’replace deck 71 ’71'approved
2091 1065 Ferndale Rd W LR-IA .878 acre LS of 75*addition to residence 42'42'approved
2241 1185 Ferndale Rd W LR-IA .887 acre LS of 75 ’enclose deck, garage addition 71' (existing)71'approved
1988 2800 Shadywood Rd LR-1B .89 acre LS of 75 ’fence new fence . new fence approved
2063 3775 Bayside Rd LR-IA .894 acre LS of 75'replace deck 58'58'approved
2066 1487 Shoreline Dr LR-IA ?LS of 75 ’rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad encroach encroach approved
1965 2525 Dunwoody Ave LR-IC ?LS of 75'replace retaining wall encroach encroach approved
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC ?LS of 75*replace residence, deck 65' (existing)65’approved
2061 3135 North Shore Dr LR-1B 1 acre LS of 75 ’replace residence 10.7% (12.3% ex.)10.70%approved
2133 1385 Orono Ln LR-IA 1.2 acres LS of 75 ’new patio 40’ (26* ex.)40’ • •!.'approved
2040 2601 W Lafayette Rd LR-1B 1.37 acres LS of 75 ’swimming pool, patio 24’24’approved
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-IA 1.94 acre LS of 75 ’replace residence 20’ (17 ex.)20’approved
2153
2079
2233
3105 1
440
*1301
OASC
2010 1420 1
2046 405 N
1992 14001
OAS :
2249 2245 1
OHW)
2195 1449 :
1947 1955 ;
PR
2097 3315 1
1959 3345 •
1937 2725 1
RSof
2107 3340:
RSof
2109 1380.
2194 1365.
2068 4040'
RSof
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 199720894520 Watertown Rd RR-1A 3.6 acres LW of 300'new residence 287.56'287.56'approvedLW of 300' Count 121533105 6th Ave N RR-1B 3.92 acres OAS new acc. struc.1,260 sq. ft.1,260 sq. f approved
2079 440 Willow Dr S RR-1B .63 acre OAS garage addition 1,077.09 sq. ft.440 sq. ft.modifM
2233 '130 N Shore Dr W LR-1B .91 acre OAS new accessory structure 1,200 sq ft 1,000 sq ft modified
OAS Count 3
2010 1420 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-1A 13.8 acres OAS > 3,000 sq. repairs to accessory structure 5,478 sq. ft.5,478 sq. f approved
2046 405 North Arm Dr RR-1B 130 acres OAS > 3.000 sq. new accessory structure approval approval approved
1992 1400 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-1A 13.8 acres OAS > 3,000 sq. retaining wall, accesory structure addn 5,478 sq. ft.5,478 sq. f approved
OAS > 3,iXXi tq. ft. uount O
2249 2245 French Lake Rd RR-1B ?OHW setback of new septic 97'97'approved
OHW setback of 150' Count 1
2195 1449 Shoreline Dr B-2 .33 acres PR repi acc struc, exp parking, exp pond 71 spaces (68 ex.)71 spaces approved
1947 1955 Shoreline Dr B-2 ?PR relocate accessory structure 41 (42 ex.)41 approved
PR Count 2
2097 3315 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C .253 acre RS of 30'replace deck 19' (9* ex.)19'approved
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-1C ?RS of 30'relocate accessory structure O'O'approved
1937 2725 Rainey Rd RR-1B 2 acres RS of 30'tennis court 10'10'approved
RS of 30' Count 3
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1 1.52 acres RS of 35'restaurant, fuel station 5'5'approved
RS of 35' Count 1
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B . 126 acre RS of 50'new porch 10'10'approved
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B .16 acre RS of 50'addition over residence 29' (existing)29'approved
2068 4040 Watertown Rd RR-1A 1.28 acres RS of 50'gar addn, addn to res, porch addn 32*32'approved
RS of 50' Count 3
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B .126 acre SC of 15%new porch 32% (existing)32%approved
1953 3475 Livingston Ave LR-1C .15 acre SC of 15%addition to residence, new deck 20%20%^approved
1997 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A .195 acre SC of 15%replace residence 27.6% (29.6% ex.)27.60%approved
2083 1535 Long Lake 8lvd LR-1A .21 acre SC of 15%replace deck, stairs 20%20%approved
2138 630 Park Ln LR-1B .23 acre SC of 15%enclose porch 27.7% (26.8% ex.)27.70%approved
2017 1905 Fagerness Pt Rd LR-1C .23 acre SC of 15%addition to residence 23% (26.5% ex.)23%approved
2131 4149 Highwood Rd LR-1B .238 acre SC of 15%upper level deck 20.4% (20.3% ex.)20.40%
• 1
approved
1994 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B .24 acre SC of 15%addition to residence, deck expansion 20.3% (19.3% ex.)20.30%-••approved
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B .243 acre SC of 15%new porch 19.3% (existing)19.3'approved
2034 1400 Cherry PI LR-1C .26 acre SC of 15%new deck 19.9% (17.6% ex.)19.90%
• *.
approved
VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997
2026
1964
1964
2033 1670 Shady wood Rd LR-IC .33 acre SC of 15%2172 4195 Forest Lake Or LR-1B .363 acre SC of 15%2066 1487 Shoreline Dr LR-1A ?SC of 15%
2161 4105 Highwood Rd LR-1B ?SC of 15%
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC ?SC of 15%
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1 1.52 acres SC of 15%
2105 1101 W Ferndale Rd LR-1A 1.94 acre SC of 15%
1992 1400 Bracketts Pt Rd LR-1A 13.8 acres SC of 15%
2046 405 North Arm Dr RR-IB 130 acres SC of 15%
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-IC .534 acre SC of 15%
2137 2709 Walters Port Ln LR-1B .56 acre SC of 15%
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B .156 acre SC of 15%
2081 1390 Rest Point Rd LR-1B .22 acre SC of 15%
2214 2016 Shady wood Rd LR-IC .314 acre SC of 15%
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-IC .316 acre SC of 15%
2180 2920 Casco Pt Rd LR-IC .33 acre SC of 15%
2073 2709 Walters Port Ln
SC of 15% Count
LR-1B ?SC of 15%
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B
2033 1670 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2173 2675 Shady wood Rd LR-1B
1953 3475 Uvingston Ave LR-1C
______SEP of 10* Count_____________
1964 2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-IC
2026 875 Wayzata Blvd RR-1B
2055 2800 Cntryside. 2425 Th RR-1B
SIGN halqht of 8' Count_______
.16 acre
.33 acre
?
.15 acre
7 acres
2 acres each
addition to residence new deckrep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad
replace accesssory structure
relocate accessory structure
restaurant, fuel station
replace residence
retaining wall, accesory structure ad<
new accessory structure
repair res, pool, new deck, boat hous
indoor spa
replace residence, accessory structur
addition to residence
SEP of 10'
SEP of 10'
SEP of 10'
SEP of 10*
SIGN height of 8'
SIGN height of 8'
SIGN height of 8'
3
addition over residence
addition to residence
garage addition, retain gazebo, deck
addition to residence, new deck
sign
sign
monument
19%19%approved16.8% (15.7% ex.)16.80%approved15.37%15.37%approved
10.00%10%approved
19.10%19.10%approved
20.20%20.20%approved
27.6% (29.6% ex.)27.60%approved
0*0*approved
16.30%16.30%approved
0.2362 (18.09 ex.)denied denied
16.7% (15.6% ex.)denied denied
22.70%22%modified
21.40%19.90%modified
20.67%19.63%modified
15.70%15.60%modified
18.40%.17.10%modified
16% (15.1% ex.)15.10%modified
3* (existing)3'approved
3.3*3.3'approved
5*5’approved
3*3’approved
9’
13.6’
ir
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1
SIGN of 100 sq. ft. Count
1.52 acres SIGN of 100 sq. f restaurant, fuel station
1
308 sq. ft.
9‘ approved
13.6* approved
withdrawn withdrawn
V_______________________________________
308 sq. ft. approved
2055
875 Wayzata Blvd RR-1B
SIGN of 12 sq. ft. Count
2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-IC
2420 Dunwoody Ave LR-IC
2800 Cntryside, 2425 Th RR-IB
7 acres
2 acres each
SIGN of 12 sq. ft. sign
SIGN of 24 sq. ft. sign
SIGN of 24 sq. ft. sign
•>
SIGN of 6 sq. ft. monument
50 sq. ft.
48 sq. ft.
148 sq. ft. (103 sq.
50 sq. ft. approved
148 sq. ft*, approved
SIGN of 6 sq. ft. Count VARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 199711953 3475 Livingston Ave LR-1C
2036 1098 Loma Linda Ave LR-1B
2017 1905 Eagerness Pt Rd LR-1C
2141 1251 Briar St RR-1B
2214 2016 Shady wood Rd LR-1C
2033 1670 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
1987 2705 Ethel Ave LR-1C
2227 3466 Ivy PI LR-1C
2230 2184 Shadywood Rd LR-1C
2181 1745 Concordia St LR-IC
2057 1745 Concordia St LR-IC
2038 1153 Elmwood Ave LR-1 B
1961 3349 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC
1959 3345 Crystal Bay Rd LR-IC
2107 3340 Shoreline Dr B-1
2106 2605 Kelly Ave LR-1B
2216 3195 Casco Cir LR-IC
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-IC
2014 1745 Concordia St LR-IC
2113 129 Chevy Chase Dr R-1A
2162 3115 North Shore Or LR-1B
1945 4450 Forest Lake Landin LR-1B
SS of 10' Count
.15 acre
.156 acre
.23 acre
.241 acre
.314 acre
.33 acre
.344 acre
.356 acre
.367 acre
.46 acre
.46 acre
?
?
?
1.52 acres
1.68 acres
.534 acre
.316 acre
?
.678 acre
?
.243 acre
SS of 10'
SS of 10*
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10*
SS of 10'
SS of 10'
SS of 10*
SS of lo
ss of lo
ss of lo
ss of lo
ss of lo
ss of 10'
SS of 10'
addition to residence, new deck
replace residence, accessory structi
addition to residence
new accessory structure
expand roof, new deck, addition to
addition to residence
new porch
extend roof, new deck
addition to residence, stair improver
replace accessory structure
replace residence, accessory structi
addition to residence
replace residence, deck
relocate accessory structure
restaurant, fuel station
remodel guest house
repair res, pool, new deck, boat hot
new accessory structure, new deck
addition to residence
garage addition
replace residence
new porch
6' (existing)6'approved
3' (6.5% ex.)3'approved
8.3- (7- ex.)8.3'approved
2' (1.8- ex.)2'approved
7'7'approved
6-, 2.6, 3.5" (8". 3.6', 2.6', 3.approved
6' (4.7- ex.)6'approved
8'8'approved
6.6- (8.9- ex.)6.6'approved
9.50%9.5 approved
9.5' (1.6' ex.)9.5'approved
9.3'9.3'approved
7.3' (existing)7.3'approved
O'O'approved
3'3'approved
3.1' (existing)3.1'approved
O' (driveway)denied denied
2' and 8'8'modified
1.5' (existing)tabled tabled
7.95-withdrawn withdrawn
?withdrawn withdrawn
6.5' (existing)6.5'approved
2068 4040 Watertown Rd
SS of 100' Count
RR-1A 1.28 acres SS of 100-gar addn, addn to res, porch addn
1
25.7-25.7*approved
2249 2245 French Lake Rd
SS of 20' Count
RR-1B ?SS of 20-new septic
1
10-10' 'approved
2109 1380 Arbor St RR-1B .126 acre SS of 30'new porch 12.3'12.3-approved
2194 1365 Arbor St RR-1B .16 acre SS of 30-addition over residence 18' (existing)18'approved
2179 2811 Casco Point Rd LR-IC .316 acre SS of 30-new accessory structure, new deck 18-18-approved
2180 2920 Casco Pt Rd LR-IC .33 acre SS of 30-attached garage, addition to residence 8*approved
2088 3770 Bayside Rd LR-1 A .46 acre SS of 30-remodel residence, addition to residenc 3.5'3.5*approved
2066 1487 Shoreline Dr LR-1 A ?SS of 30-rep roof, addn to res, carport, gar ad 16', 19-16', 19*approved
2067 625 Old Long Lake Rd RR-1B ?SS of 30-replace attached garage 23.4' (23.7' ex.)23.4' *'•. •approved
mtVARIANCE REQUESTS RANKED BY TYPE AND RESULT: JUNE 1994 TO JUNE 1997
1956
2080
1951
2099
2099
2221
2079
2161
2160
2455 Scotch Pine Ln 2005 Sugarwood Dr 253 Cygnet PI
2435 N Shore Dr
309 Westlake St
1101 W Ferndale Rd
1420 Bracketts Pt Rd
2725 Rainey Rd
2439 Sherwood Hills
1185 Ferndale Rd W
2005 Sugarwood Dr
1101 W Ferndale Rd
2005 Sugarwood Dr
1509 Long Lake Blvd
Webber Hills Rd
SS of 30' Count
4040 Watertown Rd
4045 Watertown Rd
50 Christotori Cir
372 West Lake St
372 West Lake St
SS of 50' Count
yi 15 N Shore Dr
440 Willow Dr S
4105 High wood Rd
3225 Casco Cir
STS of 15' Count
LR-1AR-1ARR-1B
LR-1A
LR-1A
LR-IA
LR-1A
RR-1B
RR-1B
LR-IA
R-1A
LR-IA
R-1A
LR-IA
RR-IB
1 acre1 acre1.07 acre
1.3 acres
1.6 acres
1.94 acre
13.8 acres
2 acres
2.291 acre
.887 acre
1 acre
.195 acre
1 acre
.383 acre
?
SS of 30* SS of 30' SS of 30'
SS of 30'
SS of 30'
SS of 30’
SS of 30’
SS of 30'
SS of 30’
SS of 30’
SS c f 30’
SS of 30’
SS of 30’
SS of 30'
SS of 30’
new deck, elevator realign driveway garage addition
replace residence
addition over residence
replace residence
repairs to accessory structure
tennis court
addition to residence
enclose deck, garage addition
realign driveway
replace residence
realign driveway
replace accessory structure, new deck 5’
garage addition 20
21' (10.34' ox.) allow curvature 16.4’ (31' ex.)16.2', 13.5’ (existin
12’
11.7', 1’ (O’ existing
4’
10’
18.6' (existing)
19.1’
allow filling
1’
17’
RR-IA
RR-1A
RR-IA
LR-IA
LR-IA
1.18 acres
10 acres
23 acres
.76 acre
1.09 acres
SS of 50’
SS of 50’
SS of 50’
SS of 50’
SS of 50’
replace residence
replace accessory structure 26 ’ (47' ex.)
addition to residence, new deck, stairs 31.4
lot line rearrangement, repair residence 20
lot line rearrangement, repair residence 20
LR-IB
RR-IB
LR-IB
LR-1C
.439 acre
.63 acre
?
?
STS of 15’
STS of 15’
STS of 15’
STS of 15’
replace residence
garage addition
replace accesssory structure
garage addition
4’ and 6*
6.4 ’ (5.2' ex.)
3’
4.4' (existing)
2247
2088
2045
1390 Park Dr
STS of 35' Count
3770 Bayside Rd
1155 Brown Rd S
STS of 50’ Count
Grand Count
LR-IB .41 acre
LR-IA .46 acre
RR-IB .46 acre
STS of 35’new garage 2.33’
21’approvedapprovedapproved16.4’approved16.2', 13.approved
12'approved
11.7', r approved
4’approved
10’approved
18.6'approved
denied denied
denied denied
2’modified
25’modified
tabled tabied
tabled tabled
"45^approved
26 ’approved
31.4'approved
dertied denied
denied denied
4’ and 6 ’approved
6.4 ’approved
3’approved
4.4’approved
X
10’modified
STS of 50’
STS of 50’
remodel residence, addition to residenc 16
addition to residence
approved
approved
••V
* *.
Zoning Applications 1975-1997Includes Variances, CUP's, Subdivisions, Vacations, Etc.
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
lOCOI^OOOO^CMCO^iOCDh^r^r^r^r^oooooooooooooo
0>0>a>0>0)0>0>0)0>0)0>0>
CD 0> O ▼- CM
00 00 GO 0> 0> O)
O O) O O O) o>
ino>o
Number of Applications
Chair Lindquist and Planning Commission Members
Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator
December 10,1997
Tree Preserv'ation and Reforestation
Lut of Exhibits
A, - Chronology of Tree Preservation Discussions and Activity To Date
B - List of Other Cities' Ordinances Reviewed
C - Basic Elements of Most Cities' Ordinances
D - Detailed APA Model Ordinance Outline
E - Current Orono Subdivision Code Language re: Tree Preservation
F - Brief Review/Outline of DRAFT Ordinance & Policy
F - DRAFT Orono Tree Preserv ation Ordinance For Discussion
G - DRAFT Orono Tree Preservation and Replacement Policy Document For DiSCVISSioll
The Planning and Park Commissions have reviewed a number of other cities' tree preservation
ordinances, including those of Shorewood, Minnetonka, and Maple Grove in some detail. While
there are some elements common to each of these ordinances, you have recognized that Orono has
unique characteristics and goals that make it difficult to adopt another city s ordinance without
significant revisions.
At prior work sessions staff has attempted to gain insight as to what you believe Orono’s ^e
preservation goals and guidelines should be. What w'e have absorbed so far includes the following.
Tree ordinance is needed primarily to preserv'C existing wooded areas of widely
v'arying acreages (and perhaps individual 'significant' trees or stands of trees). Rural
character preservation is of utmost importance. This may require creative methods
such as road corridor buffer strip easements, housing clustering, purchase of certain
tracts, etc.
While there is concern about limiting tree removal on large wooded sites which aren t
developing, the value of the laiid is normally enhanced by existing woodlands and
therefore their removal is unlikely. It may be difficult to monitor tree removals prior
to development of a site.
Unlike urbanized cities. % • -* are concerned mainly about preserving woodlands and
trees that mostly occur on privately owned properties, not just those within street
boulevaris.
Reforestation of historically cleared areas is also important. Many areas of Orono,
including both residential and commercial property, are currently open fields with few
iSSlfiQ
ration
iVhile
10 has
ithout
r
Tree Preservation & Reforestation
December 10.1997
Page 2
or no trees. These open Helds contribute to importantly to Orono's rural natural
character. When these areas are ^'cveloped, even if the development is two-acre
residential, this rural natural character can be lost. One method of preserv'ing the
natural character is to provide a treed buffer area on the perimeter of the pioperty,
particularly where it is adjacent to a public arterial roadway.
Development Orientation
□ Tree ordinance should be aimed primarily at new development, and have only
minimal impact on individual owners of e.xisting developed (and undeveloped?)
building lots. There is also strong interest having regulations apply to non-residential
development occurring outside the subdivision process.
□ The primary responsibility for providing information (tree inventory) must be the
developer, but we need to ensure that the financial demands on the developer are
reasonable. This might mean we need to limit the extent of those areas required to
be inventoried.
s tree
wing:
videly
Rural
dhods
:ertain
Enforcement of tree preservation during subdivision development is crucial to
success. Will need verv specific guidelines in place as to how tree preservation
should occur on developing sites.
We need to give developers clear guidelines as to what our goals are and what
boundaries they cannot cross, and make them part of the preservation process. It
may be helpful to consider tree preservation incentives for developers...
We need to beef up our regulations about trees/landscaping for developing
commercial sites.
1 aren't
dsand
s prior
ids and
1 street
Orono,
nth few
Impact on Homeowner
□ StatTdoes not have time to monitor cutting of individual trees on every property. If
we want this to happen we will need additional staffing (a forester).
□ We should provide friendly encouragement and tree preservation guidelines for
homeowners, but not regulate them. (How restrictive do you want to be on new home
construction on existing vacant lots after the subdivision process is completed?)
Standards
□ There are many detailed standards to be worked out, and so far not a great deal of
agreement as to the specifics. But that's OK; we need to become very clear on what
we are trying to accomplish, and then the standards can be written to fit our goals.
latural
o-acre
ng the
>perty.
e only
jped?)
dential
be the
>er are
iredto
:ial to
vation
I what
less. It
les for
/home
deal of
n what
goals.
Tree Preservation and Reforestation
December 10,1997
Page 3
Based on the above, staff is in the midst of drafting an Orono ordinance c id Policy following those
that Shorewood has adopted. So far, what is in front of you has only been minimally tweaked to
reflect some of Orono's goals, but doesn't yet get to everything noted above. And, it feels like there
is too much detail compared to what some people may want. 1 would hope it will be a lot closer to
something of value in a few weeks, after some add itional discussion.
For Monday night, it would be helpful if we can go over the purpose and j^plicability statements
to ensure we all agree on what we are trying to accomplish and to whom it should apply. This will
give staff enough direction to bring you a responsive ordinance in January.
■A
Chronology of Tree Preservation Ordinance Discussions and Activities 1996-97
December 5,1996
December 9,19%
Moorse Memo to Council
Council Adoption of Tree Preset vaucn Policy Resolution
January 28,1997
January 30,1997
March 18,1997
April 3,1997
April 7,1997
June 18,1997
June 23,1997
July 7,1997
July 7,1997
July 9,1997
July 14,1997
August 14,1997
September 12,1997
September 19, 1997
October 7, 1997
October 20,1997
Park Comm. Tree Preservation Subcommittee Meeting
David Beal Memo to Park Commission re Tree Preservation
Park Comm. Tree Preservation Subcommittee Meeting
David Beal Draft Policy Document
Park Commission Discussion of Tree Preservation Draft Policy
Tree Preservation Subcommittee Work Session
David Beal Minutes of 6/18 Tree Preservation Meeting
David Beal Memo: Requesting Council To Appoint Joint Committee
Park Commission Discussion of Tree Preservation
Liz VZ Memo to Council
Council Discussion of Tree Preserv ation: Sent on to Planning Comm.
Ron Moorse Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Commission Tree Preservation Work Session
Brad Bressler Summaiy of 9/12 Work Session
Liz VZ Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Commission Discussion of Tree Preservation
i i APA Model Ordinance Outline (For Discussion Purposes)
(This outline follows APA 'model' in Tree Conservation Ordinances. American •
Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report # 446, dated August 1993)
toried
, with
G.
H.
K.
Purpose Statement
Definitions Section
Information Submittal / Inventory Requirements
Define What Will Be Protected
- Specimen Trees / Significant Trees?
- Woodlands?
- Percentage of Tree Cover?
- Buffers? Views?
- Special Areas such as Parkways, etc.?
Define What Activities Are Covered and Who Must Comply
- Land Disturbance. vSite Clearing?
- Pruning?
- Exemptions: - Existing Residential? - Ag/Comm'l Forestry/Nurseries?
- Based on Parcel Size? - Diseased or Dangerous Trees?
- Special Features - Public Utilities and Agencies?
- Re-forestation of Historically Cleared Lands?
Define How Ordinance Will Be Administered
- Staff-administered?
- Advisor)' bodies?
- Review Procedures: - Submission Requirements - Permit Requirements
- Fees - Notification - Appeals
Define Standards for Permit Reviews:
- Permit & Plan Review Standards
- Replacement / mitigation standards
- Economic hardship a factor?
- Standards and Flexibility
Define Construction Protection Measures:
- Impact injuries/Accidental Cutting
- Excavation
- Grade Changes
- Other Construction Hazards
- Construction Monitoring
Establish What Degree of Maintenance "After Development" is Desired/Required
Establish Enforcement Program:
- Who Enforces
- Fines and Penalties
- Escrow accounts / Certificates of occupancy
- Other administrative Measures
Complements to Regulation:
- Incentives
- 'Compensation' Mechanisms
- Education
EXISTING SUBDIVISION CODE - TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS
Current Code Wording:
SEC. 11.03 DEFINITIONS.
Subd. 2. Def. #58. "Shade Trees" - A tree of approved species and size.
SEC. 11.10 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION.
Subd. 10 (C) Class III Subdivisions. Complete Cla.ss III Preliminar>’ Plat
applications shall include the following: ...; (8) a vegetation preservation and protection plan;...
SEC. 11.60 PRESERVATION Of NATURAI. FEATURES AND AMENITIES.
Subd. 1. General. Existing features which would add value to residential
development or to the City as a whole, such as trees, as herein defined, watercourses and falls,
beaches, historic spots, and similar irreplaceable assets, shall be preserved in the design of the
subdivision. No trees shall be removed from any subdivision nor any change of the grade of the
land effected until approval of the preliminary subdivision has been granted. All trees on the
subdivision plan to be preserved, and all trees where required shall be welled and protected against
change of grade. The vegetation map shall show the number and location of existing trees, as
required by this Chapter and shall further indicate all those marked for retention, and the location
of all proposed shade trees required along the street side of each lot as required by these regulations.
Subd. 2. Shade Trees Planted by Subdivider.
A. As a requirement of subdivision approval, the City may require that
subdivider plant shade trees on the property of the subdivision. Such trees are to be planted within
five (5) feet of the right-of-way of the road or roads within and abutting the subdivision, or, at the
discretion of the City, within the right-of-way of such roads. One (i) tree shall be planted for every
forty (40) feet of frontage along each road unless the Council, upon recommendation of the City staff
shall grant a waiver.
B. New trees to be provided pursuant to this Chapter shall be approved by
the City and shall be planted in accordance with the specif.cations of the City, such trees shall have
a minimum trunk diameter (measured twelve (12) inches above ground level) of not less than two
(2) inches. Only Oak, Honey Locust, Hard Maples, Ginkgo, Ash or other long-lived shade trees,
acceptable to the City shall be planted.
Plat
Brief Review/Outline of DRAFT Ordinance & Policy
1. David Beal's 4/3/97 draft for discussion is virtually identical to Shorewood's pojiey
resolution. Note that Shorewood adopted a half-page tree QrdinwiW that references the Trw
Preservation and Replacement Policy which is adopted by rgSOlmiQO- A benefit of this is that
the Policy may be re’. ised by resolution from time to time, rather than requiring an ordinance
change. Other cities ha\ e incorpiorated their policies into their ordinance directly rather than
by reference. Either way works, but the 'separate policy document' method results in more
flexibility for future revisions.
2. The Shorewood ordinance as adapted by staff for Orono (for discussion) contains merely 3
paragraphs;
The same 'Purpose' statement that appears in the Policy document
A statement that the City will adopt tree preservation regulations by resolution
A statement that non-compliance with the regulations constitutes a violation
3. The Policy document has been re-drafted by stafl and contains the following elements.
I.Purpose Statement
(Indicates City's intent is to protect significant trees, stands of trgSS and
wooded buffer areas)
ition
ons.
II. Applicability Statement
(Defines that this ordinance applies to land being subdivided. vatWlt lotS bglllg
built on. and nil non-residential new construction and development)
III. Definitions
Procedures
A. Development Standards
(States that preservation is required and lists criteria to determine
whether compliance is achieved)
B. Permit Requirements
(Includes a detailed list of items to be submitted and procedures)
V. Tree & Site Related Disturbances
(An informative section that defines in detail what constitutes 'disturbance)
VI. Methods of Tree Protection
(Detailed guidelines for measures to protect trees during development)
Appendix A: Technical Terms
Appendix B: Checklist for Tree Protection Plan
Appendix C; Example of Tree Preservation Site Plan
Figure 1: Typical Critical Root Zone Diagram
Figure 2: Active Protective Tree Fencing Diagram
Figure 3: Passive Protection Detail Diagram
ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES
sly 3
and
2Sm&
mine
;s)
Eince')
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE ’
BY ADDING TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS
The City Council of the City of Orono ordains:
Section I. The Municipal Zoning Code of the City of Orono, Minnesota is amended by adding
Section 10.57, Tree Preserv'ation, as follows:
Section 10.57. Tree Preservation.
Subd. 1. Purpose. It is the policy of the City of Orono to recognize and preserve
existing natural resources of the community. Northern Orono is characterized by its rural
vistas interspersed with woodlands, and southern Orono by its miles of wooded Lake
Minnetonka shoreline. The City finds that its trees and woodlands provide numerous benefits
including, but not limited to: stabilization of the soil by the prevention of erosion and
sedimentation, reduction of storm water runoff, improvement of air quality, reduction of
noise pollution, control of urban heat island effect, protection and increase of property values
pmtecuon of privacy, energy conservation through natural insulation, providing habitat foi^
birds and other wildlife, and conser\ation and enhancement of the city ’s physical and
aestheuc environment. The purpose of this policy is to preserv e and protect significant trees,
stands of trees and wooded buffer areas, the loss of w hich as a result of land disturbances
associated with the process of development or construction would adversely affect the
character of the City and the integrity and quality of its development. This policy also
recogmzes that, despite the best efforts of the City and property owners, trees may
occasionally be lost in the development or construction process. In those cases tree
replacement or reforestation shall be required.
Subd. 2. Regulations. In furtherance of the puipose of this section, the City Council
shall by resolution adopt and may, from time-to-time, amend resolutions providing for tree
preservation and replacement in situations involving development or construction.
1 Enforcement. Failure to comply with the provisions of such
regulations rhall constitute a violation of this Ordinance and the Zoning Code.
M^publLtb^n Publication. This ordinance shall be effective after the date of approval
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this
a vote of__ayes and____nays.
ATTEST:
day of ., 1998 by
, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
I. Purpose. It is the policy of the City of Orono to recognize and preserve existing
natural resources of the community. Northern Orono is characterized by its rural
vistas interspersed with woodlands, and southern Orono by its miles of wooded Lake
Minnetonka shoreline. The City finds that its trees and woodlands pro'dde numerous
benefits including, but not limited to; stabilization of the soil by the prevention of
erosion and sedimentation, reduction of storm water runoff, improvement of air
quality, reduction of noise pollution, control of urban heat island effect, protection
and increase of property values, protection of privacy, energy conservation through
natural insulation, providing habitat for birds and other wildlife, and conservation
and enhancement of the city’s physical and aesthetic environment.
The purpose of this policy is to preserve and protect significant trees, stands of trees
and wooded buffer areas, the loss of which as a result of land disturbances associated
with the process of development or construction would adversely affect the character
of the City and the integrity and quality of its development. This policy also
recognizes that, despite the best efforts of the City and property owners, trees may
occasionally be lost in the jevelopment or construction process. In those cases tree
replacement or reforestation shall be required.
r
II. Applicability. This policy shall apply to any person or private or public entity
that would disturb land areas and impact significant trees or stands of trees:
a) within residential subdivisions during the subdivision development phase
and in conjunction with all non-residential development whether or not involving a
subdivision; and
b) during construction of new homes on individual previously undeveloped
lots oi sites within a subdivision or parcel.
This policy shall not apply to the incidental tree removal which occurs from time to
time within individual developed residential lots, and shall not apply to remodeling,
additions or reconstruction of residences on previously developed lots, and shall not
apply to the construction of accessoiy' buildings on developed residential lots.
The City Council may waive these requirements where there would be greater public
need for the project than to meet the requirements of this policy. The terms and
provisions of this Policy, in conjunction with the Orono Tree Preservation Ordinance
No.___shall apply to all activity which requires the issuance of a Land Alteration
Permit or a Building Permit involving disturbance of the land.
r
I
:i ‘
III. Defliiitions. All words in this Policy have their customary dictionary
definition except as specifically defined herein. The word "shall" is mandatory and
the words "should" and "may" are permissive. Technical terms used in this Policy ^
defined in Appendix A.
Ruildable Area: The portion of a lot which is not located within any minimum
required yard, landscape strip/area, or buffer; that portion of a lot wherein a principal
building may be located, as prescribed by the Orono Zoning Code.
DRH (Diameter-at-Brea.st-Height'): A standard measure of tree size, whereby a tree
trunk diameter is measured in inches at a height of four and one-half feet (4 1/2)
above ground. If a tree splits into multiple trunks below four and one-half feet (4
1/2'), then the trunk is measured at its most narrow point beneath the split.
Dripline: A vertical line extending from the outer surface of a tree's branch tips
down to the ground.
Land Alteration Permit: An official authorization issued by the Zoning
Administrator, allowing defoliation or alteration of the site for the commencement
of any construction.
Perimeter Buffer: (TO BE DEFINED)
Prn.ection Zone: All lands that fall outside the buildable area of a parcel.
Significant Trees: Any healthy long-lived hardwood deciduous tree measuring eight
inches (8") DBH or greater; any healthy softwood deciduous tre. measuring twelve
inches (12") DBH or greater; or any healthy coniferous tree measuring eight feet (8')
or more in height. Box-elder, cottonwood, and willow trees shall not be considered
to be significant trees.
Specimen Tree or Stand: Any tree or grouping of trees which has been determined
to be of a high value by the Zoning Administrator because of its species, size, age,
or other professional criteria.
Structure: An>thing which is built, constructed or erected; an edifice or building of
any kind or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined
together in some definite manner whether temporary or permanent in character.
Tree: Any self supporting woody plant, usually having a single woody trunk, and a
potential DBH of two inches (2") or more.
Tree Preservation Plan: A plan established in Section IV(B) of this Policy. See
Appendices B and C.
Znnint; Administrator: The agent of the City of Orono having the primary
responsibilities of administration and enforcement of this Policy.
r
IV. Procedures.
* •
A. Development Standards. Developments shall be designed to preserve significant
trees, specimen trees or stands, and perimeter buffers where such preservation would
not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare. The City may prohibit
removal of all or a part of a stand of trees or existing perimeter buffer. Additionally,
nothing in this policy shall prevent building on an existing lot of record, provided
that such building shall be designed to save as many trees as possible. Criteria to be
used in determining compliance with this section include but are not limited to.
1.
2.
3.
Size of trees.
Species, health and attractiveness of the trees including:
a. Sensitivity to disease
b. Life span
c. Nuisance characteristics
d. Sensitivity to grading
Potential for transplanting.
4. Need for thinning a stand of trees.
5. Effect on the functioning of a development.
6. Public benefit of maintaining a perimeter buffer.
B. Land Alteration Permit Supplemental Requirements. For any activity covered in
Item II above which requires a land alteration permit or building permit which
involves disturbance of the land and involves the potential removal or destruction of
trees, the following supplemental permit requirements apply to the issuance of said
permit:
1.A tree survey, prepared by a registered land surveyor or landscape
architect, shall be submitted showing size, species and location of
significant trees, stands of trees, and existing perimeter buffers.
2. A Tree Preservation Plan shall be submitted with the following:
a.
b.
c.
Preliminary plat for the subdivision of property.
Other permit drawings as part of the building permit process
for the construction of new principal buildings.
Non-residential site plans, either as a separate drawing or as
part of the landscape plan.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The Tree Preser\ ation Plan shall be certified by a forester or registered
landscape architect and shall include the following information:
a. Identification of spatial limits:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(6)
(7)
Limits of land disturbance, clearing, grading and
trenching
Tree protection zones
Specimen trees, stands of trees and perimeter buffers
Location of significant tree, stands of trees or perimeter
buffers which will be saved
Location of significant trees, stands of trees or
perimeter buffers which will be removed
Location of trees to be transplanted
Location of replacement trees
b.Detail drawings of tree protection merasures as provided for
in Section VI of this Policy where applicable.
c.Drawings indicating location of applicable utilities (City water
or well, Cit> sewer or septic sites, electricity, gas, phone, cable
TV)
These plans shall be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator for
conformance with this policy, in conjunction with the Orono Tree
Preservation Ordinance No.___and will either be approved or
returned for revisions. Reasons for denial shall be noted on the Tree
Preser\ ation Plan, or otherwise stated in writing
Issuance of the Land Alteration Pemiit is contingent upon subdivision
approval, or approval of the Tree Preservation Plan for other building
permit processes or non-residential site plans.
A fee as provided in the current City Fee Schedule shall be charged
for review of Tree Preservation Plans. Any costs incurred by the City
in reviewing plans for plats and and non-residential site plans shall be
charged to the developer. The Zoning Administrator may submit the
plan to a consulting professional forester or landscape architect for a
recommendation, the costs of which shall be paid by the developer or
builder.
All tree protection measures shall be installed prior to beginning
building construction and inspected by the Zoning Administrator or
designated City staff
The Zoning Administrator or designated City staff will conduct
follow-up site inspections for enforcement of this Policy, in
J
r
9.
conjunction with the Orono Tree Preservation Ordinance No.
If any tree, stand of trees or perimeter buffer that has been identified
for preservation within a development or on a building site is cut,
damaged, or the area w ithin the dripline of said tree or group of trees
has been encroached upon by grading equipment, without City
authorization, the City shall require replacement pursuant to Item 10.
below. In addition, if the City determines that a damaged tree or
group of trees will probably not sur\ ive, said tree or group of trees
shall be removed by the developer or builder.
All significant trees removed or damaged during the process of land
development or construction activities shall be replaced on site. The
removal of trees on public right-of-way, conducted by or on behalf of
a governmental agency in pursuance of its lawful activities or
functions, shall be exempt from this replacement. Replacement
standards are as follows:
a.Any trees required to be planted shall be varied in species,
shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not
include any species under disease epidemic, and shall be hardy
under local conditions.
b. Tree Replacement Ratio
Significant deciduous trees eight inches (8") DBH
or greater shall be replaced by two (2), two and a half
inch (2.5") DBH or greater deciduous trees or two six
foot (6‘) high coniferous trees.
Significant deciduous trees twelve inches (12") DBH
or greater shall be replaced by three (3), two and a half
inch (2.5") DBH or greater deciduous trees or three (3),
six-foot (6') high coniferous trees.
Significant coniferous trees six feet (6') high or greater
shall be replaced by one (1 ) six-foot (6') high or greater
coniferous tree.
Significant coniferous trees twelve feet (12') highor
greater shall be replaced by two (2) six foot (6') high
or greater coniferous trees.
In no case will the total number of replacement trees
exceed eight (8) trees per acre.
c.Before any construction takes place, tree protection measures
as set forth in section VI (B) of this policy shall be placed
r
d.
e.
around tree protection zones and around the driplines of
significant treees to be preserved. Signs shall be placed along
fence lines prohibiting grading beyond the fence line.
Any trees required to be planted shall be replaced if they die
or appear to be dying within two (2) full growing seasons of
planting by the person responsible for the planting.
Replacement trees shall be of a similar species to the trees
which are lost or removed and shall include those species
shown on the following list:
Deciduous Trees
Green Ash - Fraxinus pennsyhanica
Mountain Ash - Sorbus spp.
River Birch - Benda nigra
Kentucky CofTeetree - Gymnoclachis dioicus
Amur Corktree - Phellodendron amureme
Flowering Crabapple - Mai us spp.
Ginkgo (male only) - Ginkgo biloba
Hackberry - Cellis occidentalis
Hawthorn - Crataegus spp.
Shagbark Hickory - Carya ovata
Honeylocust - Gleditsia Hatriacanthos
Ironwood - Oslrya virginiana
Japanese Tree Lilac - Syringa amurensisjaponica
American Linden - Tilia americana
Littleleaf Linden - Tilia cordata
Redmond Linden - Tilia americana 'Redmond'
Black Locust - Robinia psuedoacacia
Amur Maple - Acer ginnala
Norway Maple - Acer platanoides
Red Maple - Acer rubrurn
Silver Queen Maple (seedless) - Acer saccharinum 'Silver
Queen'
Sugar Maple - Acer saccharum
Northern Catalpa - Catalpa speciosi
Bur Oak - Quercus macrocar pa
Pin Oak - Quercus pal us iris
Red Oak - Quercus rubra
Swamp White Oak - Quercus bicolor
White Oak - Quercus alba
Ohio Buckeye - Aesculus glabra
Russian Olive - Eleagnus angustifolia
Black Walnut - Juglans nigra
i
8
Conifers
American Arbor\itae - Thuja occidentalis
Balsam Fir - Abies balsamea
Douglas Fir - Pseudolsuga menziesii
White Fir -Abies concolor
Canadian Hemlock - Tsuga canadensis
European Larch - Larix decidua
Austrian Pine - Pinus nigra
Norway Pine - Pinus resinosa
Red Pine - Pinus resinosa
Scotch Pine - Pinus sylvestris
WTiite Pine - Pinids strobus
Black Hills Spruce - Picea glauca densata
Colorado Spruce - Picea pungens
Norway Spruce - Picea abies
White Spruce - Picea glauca
Tamarack - Larix laricina
11. Financial Guarantee - Subdividers.
a.Subdividers shall provide a financial guarantee as part of the
development contract to ensure replacement ot significant
trees lost in the development process. The amount of the
financial guarantee shall be determined by the Zoning
Administrator, based upon estimates made by the subdivider’s
registered landscape architect or actual bids prepared by a
certified nurseryman. This shall be a separate line item in the
development contract and shall be the basis for a development
contract wrhere the lack of public improvements would
otherwise not require a contract.
b.
This financial guarantee shall be held for at least two (2) full
growing seasons beyond the date of installation of the last
replacement tree or beyond the last date of site activity that
may impact tree survival.
In addition to a. above subdividers shall provide a financial
guarantee as part of the development contract to ensure
protection of all significant trees to be saved. For each mass
graded lot with at least one (1) significant tree to be saved and
each custom graded lot with at least one (1) significant tree,
the subdivider shall pay a fee as established in the current City
fee schedule.
This financial guarantee will be released upon 1) certification
r
jfj wxiting by the subdivider’s forester or lundscspe srchitect
indicating that tree protection measures were installed on mass
graded lots and tree replacement is completed, if necessary
and'or 2) the builders have posted security for the custom
graded lots.
12. Financial Guarantee - Builders.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Homebuilders shall provide a financial guarantee as part of the
building permit application to ensure protection of all
significant trees to be saved. For all lots with at least one (1)
significant tree to be saved the builder shall provide a letter of
credit or cash escrow as established in the current City fee
schedule.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or release
of the tree protection guarantee, the builders forester or
landscape architect shall certify to the City in wxiting that all
the tree protection measures identified on the tree preservation
plan were installed from the start of construction to the end of
construction and tree replacement, is completed, if necessary.
The Building Official will monitor the tree protection
measures at the time of routine inspections.
Builders are liable for subcontractors which destroy or damage
significant trees which were indicated to be saved on the
individual lot tree preser\'ation plan.
V. Tree & Site Related Disturbances.
A. Tree protection zones, specimen trees or stands of trees designated to* be
saved must be protected from the following damages which may occur during all
phases of land disturbance and construction processes. Methods of tree protection
and disturbance prevention are provided in Section VI.
1 . Direct physical root damage
2. Indirect root damage
3. Trunk and crown disturbance
B. Direct physical root damage most frequently occurs during site clearing and
grading operations, where transport or feeder roots are cut, tom, or removed.
1. Transport and feeder roots tend to tangle and fuse among the roots of
adjacent trees. The removal of trees -vith heavy machinery along the
outer periphery' of a tree save area causes root damage.
2. The most substantial form of root damage for all root types occurs in
the form of cut roots. Roots are cut in grade reduction, or from
trenching for underground utilities, sanitary sewer, or storm sewer
lines.
3. A more subtle type of root damage is the loss of feeder roots. Feeder
roots normally occur within the organic layer, and the surface four
inches (4") of top soil, subsequently, these roots can be easily
damaged by the track action from a single bulldozer pass. The
stripping of top soil within a tree's critical root zone can totally
eliminate its feeder root system.
C. Indirect root damage through site modification can result from positive grade
changes, temporary' storage of fill material, the sedimentation of erosion
materials, soil compaction, and soil chemical changes.
1 . Positive grade changes from fill and sedimentation causes a decrease
in soil oxygen levels. An increase in soil carbon dioxide and other
toxic gases can also occur, leading to large areas of anaerobic
conditions. Anaerobic soil conditions cause a decrease in the root
respiration process which is essential for the uptake and transport of
minerals and nutrients.
2. Anaerobic soil conditions are also produced by soil compaction, the
increase in soil bulk density with a decrease in soil spore space.
Compacted soil is also impervious to root penetration, and thus
inhibits root development. Soil compaction is generally caused by the
weight and vibrations of heavy machinery, vehicle parking, and the
storage of fill and/or construction materials within the critical root
zones of trees.
/
3. Changes in soil chemistry will adversely affect tree survival. The most
frequent occurrence is the change (decrease) in soil acidity by
concrete washout. The leakage or spillage of toxic materials such as
fuels or paints can be fatal for trees.
D. Trunk and crown disturbances are generally mechanical in nature and
are either caused directly by clearing and grading machinery, or indirectly by
debris being cleared and falling into trees marked for protection.
1 . Common forms of damage include stripped bark and cambium, split
trunks, and broken limbs.
2. Damage also occurs from the posting of signs such as building
permits, or survey markers on trees.
3. Indirect damage can be caused by the placement of bum holes or
debris fires loo close to trees. The possible range of damages includes
scorched tmnks with some cambial dieback, the loss of foliage due
to evaporative heat stress (leaf desiccation), and completely burned
tmnks and crowns.
VI. Methods of Tree Protection.
A. Planning and considerations. Tree space is the most critical factor in tree
protection throughout the development process. The root system of trees can easily
extend beyond the dripline of the tree canopy (Figure 1). The root system within the
dripline region is generally considered to be the protected root zone. Disturbance
within this zone can directly affect a tree's chances of surv ival. With reference to root
zones, the following standards shall apply:
1.
3.
Tne use of tree save islands and stands is encouraged rather than the
protection of individual (nonspecimen) trees scattered throughout a
site. Tliis will facilitate ease in overall site organization as related to
tree protection.
The protective zone of specimen trees or stands of trees or otherwise
designated tree save areas shall include no less than the total area
beneath the tree(s) canopy as defined by the farthest canopy dripline
of the tree(s). In some instances, the Zoning Administrator may
require a protective zone in excess of the area defined by the tree's
dripline.
Layout of the project site utility and grading plans shall accommodate
the required tree protective zones. Utilities must be placed along
corridors between tree protective zones.
Construction site activities such as parking, material storage, concrete
washout, hole placement, etc., shall be arranged so as to prevent
disturbances within tree protective zones.
Alterations to the protective zone of the specimen trees or stands of
trees must be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
B. Protective Barriers.
2.
3.
Active protective tree fencing shall be installed along the outer edge
of and completely surrounding the critical root zones of all specimen
trees or stands of trees, or otherwise designated tree protective zones,
prior to any building construction.
These fences will be a minimum four feet (4'1 high. Four-feet (4') high
orange polyethylene laminar safety fencing is acceptable (Figure 2).
Passive forms of tree protection may be utilized to delineate tree save
areas which are remote from areas of land disturbance. These areas
must be completely surrounded with continuous rope or flagging
(heavy mil - minimum four inches (4") wide). All passive tree
protection must be accompanied by "Keep Out" or "Tree Save"
signage (Figure 3).
4. All tree protection zones should be designated as such with "Tree Save
Area" signs posted visibly on all sides of the fenced area. These signs
are intei ded to infomi subcontractors of the tree protection process.
Signs reqev'.ting subcontractor coopieration and compliance with tree
protection -.andards are recommended for site entrances.
5. All tree fencing barriers must be installed prior to and maintained
throughout building construction and should not be removed until
completion of construction and until landscaping is installed.
C. Encroachment. Most trees can tolerate only a small percentage of critical root
zone loss. If encroachment is anticipated within the critical root zones of
specimen trees, stands of trees, or otherwise designated tree protective zones,
the following preventive measures shall be employed:
1. Clearing Activities: Roots often fuse and tangle amongst trees. The
removal of trees adjacent to tree save areas can cause inadvertent
damage to the protected trees. Wherever possible, it is ad'dsable to cut
minimum two foot (2 ‘) trenches (e.g., with a "ditch-witch") along the
limits of land disturbances, so as to cut, rather than tear, roots.
Directionally felling trees outward into disturbance areas and grinding
stumps is also acceptable.
2. It is ver>' strongly suggested that all clearing in oak stands be done
before May 1st and after July 1st of each season. This will help to
prevent the inadvertent wounding of trees with the consequential
spread of oak wilt. If clearing has to be done at this time, all stumps
and wounded trees shall have the wound areas painted thoroughly
with a tree paint. To be effective, the painting shall be performed
within the same day of cutting. Should oak wilt get started as a result
of construction during the months of May and June, then the
developer/builder shall pay for all additional on-site oak wilt control
measures needed to control the disease.
3. Where the Zoning Administrator has determined that irreparable
damage has occurred to trees within tree protective zones, they must
be removed and replaced by the developer/builder as provided in
Section IV(B)9.
*
r
D. Reclamation of the Growing Site. A tree’s ability for adequate root
development, and ultimately its chances for survival, are improved with reclamatfdn
of the growing site. Whenever possible, the soil should be brought back to its natural
grade. Unnecessary fill, erosion sedimentation, concrete washout, and construction
debris should be removed. When machinery ’ is required for site improvement, it is
recommended that a "rubber-tired skid steer loader" or similar light weight rubber
tire vehicle be used so as to minimize soil compaction.
r
CITY OF ORONO TREE PRESERVATION POLICY
APPENDIX A
Technical Terms:
Cambium: The tissue within the ut)ody portion of trees and shrubs which gives rise
to the woody water and nutrient conducting system, and the energy substrate
transport system in trees.
Cambial dieback: The irreparable radial(?) of vertical interruption of a tree’s
cambium, usually caused by mechanical damage, such as "skinning bark", or from
excessive heat.
Coniferous: Belonging to the group of cone-bearing evergreen trees or shrubs.
Deciduous: Not persistent; the shedding of lea\es annually.
Feeder Roots: A complex system of small annual roots growing outvsard and
predominantly up\\‘ard from the system of "transport roots". These roots branch four
or more times to form fans or m.ats of thousands of fine, short, non-woody tips. Many
of these small roots and their multiple tips are 0.2 to 1mm or less in diameter, and
less than 1 to 2mm long. The .e roots constitute the major fraction of a tree’s root
system surface area, and are the primary sites ot absorption of water and nutrients.
Mainr Woodv Roots: First order tree roots originating at the "root collar" and
growing horizontally in the soil to a distance of between 3 and 15 feet from the trees
trunk. These roots branch and decrease in diameter to give rise to "rope roots". The
primary' function of major woody roots include anchorage, structural support, the
storage of food reserv'es, and the transport of minerals and nutrients.
Protected Root Zone: The rooting area of a tree established to limit root disturbances.
This zone is generally defined as a circle with a radius extending from a tree s trunk
to a point no less than the furthest crown dripline. Disturbances w'ithin this zone will
directly affect a tree’s chance for survival.
Root Collar: The point of attachment of major woody roots to the tree trunk, usually
at or near the groundline and associated with a marked swelling of the tree trunk.
Root Respiration: An active process occurring throughout the feeder root system of
trees, and involving the consumption of oxygen and sugars with the release of energy
and carbon dioxide. Root respiration facilitates the uptake and transport of minerals
and nutrients essential for tree suivival.
Rope Roots: An extensive network of woody second order roots arising from major
woody roots, occurring within the surface 12 to 18 inches of local soils, and with an
average size ranging from 0.25 to 1 inch in diameter. The primary function of rope
r
roots is the transport of water and nutrients, and the storage of food reserv es.
Soil Compaction : A change in soil physical properties which includes an increase in
soil weight per unit volume, and a decrease in soil pore space. Soil compaction is
caused by repeated vibrations, frequent traffic and weight. As related to tree roots,
compacted soil can cause physical root damage, a decrease in soil oxygen levels with
an increase in toxic gases, and can be imperv ious to new^ root development.
Tran»;nort Roots: The system or framework of tree roots comprised of major roots
and rope roots.
r
appendix b
Checklist for Tree Protection Plan:
Tree Protection Plans.
a.
c.
Provisions for tree protection on the site shall be, at a minimum, in
conformance with the requirements of the City of Orono Tree Preser% ation
Policy in conjunction with the Orono Tree Preservation Ordinance No.----.
A Tree Preservation Plan shall be submitted either as part ot a landscape plan,
preliminar> plat, or as a separate drawing, to include the following:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
All tree protection zones
Approximate location of all specimen trees or stands ot trees
Approximate location of all specimen trees w hen their preservation
is questionable, or might result in a change of the site design
Identification of specimen trees to be remov ed (Removal of specimen
trees is subject to Building and Zoning Adnfilfistrator approval).
Limits ot clearing and land disturbance such as grading, trenching,
etc. where these disturbances may affect tree protection zones
Proposed location of underground utilities
Methods of tree protection shall be indicated tor all tree protection
zones, aeration systems, staking, signage, etc.
The plan should indicate staging areas for parking, material storage,
concrete washout, and burial holes where these areas might affect tree
protection.
The following notes shall be indicated on both tree preserv'ation plans and
grading plans in large letters;
(1)Contact the City Planning Department at 473-7357 to arrange a
pre-construction conference with the City Zoning Administrator prior
to anv land disturbance.
(2) All tree protection measures shall be installed prior to building
construction.
(3) Contact the t ily of Orono Planning Department at 473-7357 tor a Site
Inspection upon completion of landscape installation.
r
hPR 04 'SC lO^OT-rtl TR h'vCLU h'i-S
TREE PRESERVATION POLICY
CITY OF ORONO
APPENDIX C SAMPLE DRIVE
R.O. GROUP ______—----------------------
KEY
CH - CHERRY
B.O. - RED OAK
V,'.0. - WHITS OAK
A-ASH
1S FOOT WORKING ENVELOPE
FENCING & WARNING SIGNAGE
LTnUTV ALLEf
STOCKPILE PERIMETER
TREE TO 86 REMOVED
r 1
hFP 04 '9T 10:OfHri TPh/ELUm.S P.ll II
T5
\Canopy Drip-line
?>—— ----- ---------------------------------------
,i:oo«J95St.'-
ty*iii
T^iiissSSS&jci^^
Critical Root Radius
Critical Root Zone Within the Drip-lin^
Accual Feeder Root Svsiem Extend» WeU Beyond ihe Drip-lme
figure 1
typical critical root zone
AFP 04 *97 10:C6Mft TF hVELII h'.9 P.IZ' IZ
tree FCNCIMC shall consist CP
4JI' HIGH MINIMUM CMAWGC PQLYETHyLENC
LAMINAR SATCTV netting.
rtNCC SHALL BE StCURCLT ANCHORED BY
STCO. FENCE POSTS INSTALLED 6.0 FEET
CENTER.
. *
FIGURE 2
ACTIF'E PROTECTIVE TREE FENCING
04 '97 10:09Hri TPhVI:lU h>S P.IO IZ
Passive Protection with Rope and Signage
figure 3
PASSIVE protection DETAIL
H
MEMORANDUM
DATE:12/4/97
TO:Chair Lindquist and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Brad Dressier, Planning Assistant
RE:Orono Business Inventory
ATTACHMENTS: A: Orono Business Directory
B: Businesses With More Than Four Employees in Residential Zones
C: Zoning Code Provisions Regarding Home Occupations
D: List of Licensed Home Occupations
Di^g October and November, i997 a study was conducted to inventory business located in Orono.
Prior to ^s time, there was no comprehensive record containing this information. Information
gathered includes determuiing what types of businesses Orono has, where they are located and what
are the largest businesses in terms of employees and sales. This study has answered these questions.
The purpose of this inventory is to keep track of home occupations, assist in completing a Minnesota
Department of Trade and Economic Development community profile sheet and to serve as a
reference for staff regarding Orono businesses in general.
To determine the nature of each business. Standard Industrial Codes (SIC) were used. These are
numbers assigned to each business registered with the Department of Trade and Economic
Development to denote their primary function(s). As shown in the directory, each SIC is shown, as
well as what the numbers represent.
Attachment A is the business directory. The information is sorted by zoning district, as well as
number of employees. Table 1 summarizes the number of businesses in each zoning district.
Table 1
Number of Businesses in Orono. By Zoning ni<;trirf
Zoning U*B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 I LR-IA LR-IB LR-IC LR-lC-1 RR-IA RR-IB
Number 3 43 3 8 5 13 8
♦unknown, post office box
There are 72 business located in the business zoning districts. The majority of these are located in
the B-1 district. There are five businesses located in the industrial district. Th» largest number of
businesses are located in the residential zoning districts as 101 were quantified. This indicates there
^ •
may be a large number of home occupations in Orono.
The following table is a summary of the findings in Attachment B. which lists businesses in
residential zoning districts that have more than four employees.
Table 2
Businesses With More Than Four Employees in Residential Zoning Distnets
Number of Employees LR-IA LR-IC RR-IA RR-IB Total
100 to 249
50 to 99
20 to 49
10 to 19
5 to 9
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
2
8
7
1
4
4
8
9
Totals 1 1
The majority of businesses with more than four employees located in residential zoning districts
occur in the RR-IB district. Of those businesses employing 20 or more, all but one do not
appear to be home occupations. Most of these are country clubs or educational facilities. Of
those businesses with five or more employees, most appear to be city fimetions or educational.
Of those businesses that have residential addresses, their type includes metal service, recreation,
lawn and garden service, day care, plastic products and auto parts. These are relatively few in
number.
Judging by the findings of business directory, there are many businesses that have residential
addresses. The inventory indicates that many businesses have owners, employees or
representatives identifying their residences as the mailing address for their company or employer.
No survey or inspections have been conducted to determine which of these "businesses” have on
site operations.
Attachment A: ORONO BUSINESS DIRECTORY BY ZONING DISTRICT. 1997BOIHFCitfa■ SIC Coda
Cryaiii Boy. Sf 32S F •411
Maaawp. SSStl r 1731. 1921
Navarro. SfSt2 1 1711
IObbpI 3
IMtaamaCaaat 3
Waysaia. SS2B1 B-1 9B12. 7942. 7949
Wayaaia. BBSS 1 B-1 9941
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 2434. 9712
LdiipLalm.BB2SB B-1 72B9
Wayiaia. BBSB1 B-1 B39B
Wayuia. BB2B1 B-1 9B13
Wtyiala. BB2B1 B-1 7231. 7299
Wayiaia. BBSB1 B-1 7B4I
Wayyaia. BB3B1 B-1 7231
Untlaha. BBSS#B-1 •912. 9411
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 23«9
Waytaia. BB3B1 B-1 •291. 9231
Wayaaia, BB2B1 B-1 9931. 9093
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 7399. 9291. 9947
Wpytaiai BB2B1 B1 4311
tarwLata.BB2BBB-1 7299
Lai« LaBa. BB2BB B-1 7231
toi^ Lata. BB2SB B-1 9912. 9999
Lanp Lata. BB1B4 B-1 9099
Loap Laka. BBIBi B-1 792
Wayaaia. BBSS!B-1 •721
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 7311
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 •742
Waytaia^ B«St1 B-1 3922. 3434
WayiaiA BB2S1 B-1 7334. 7399. 4922
Waytaia. BB2B1 B-1 9211. 9719. 1791
Waytaia. BBSS 1 B-1 7212
Wayiata. BB2S1 B-1 7922
WayiNt. BB2B1 B-1 1793. 6231. 9719
Waytaia. BB2B1 B 1 9713. 7217. 9231
Waytaia. BB9B1 B-1 7999
Waytaia. BB2B1 B-1 9921
Waytaia. B62t1 B-1 7933. 9913
Cbikbci f Bltapli
I arofcw
Wwli/SMito Pamiv
FNkmon AaptaSaum. Aaaoc.
VNapa Bocinc. inc
WOBor HoNor FWmiim and KaaPnp
Ba> 92
Boa 19
Baa 74
471^799 F
471 7717 OovidBN
47O0S22 WNMiHoitor
1 104
1 104
1li4
< I.Om
< k.im
< l.im
Cuhrtra. 0* StdkYarta 2420 Shadywood Rd 471 0729 Jdim 0* Stdkvan 20 la 49 • 9m to 11m
Navarra Amoco 3390 SharaBna Or 471 90B2 URayKoohnon lOlolS •1 li •S.Sm
GBhCabmata 399B Shorokna Or 471-B434 PalOonpoaka iota 19 •.Imia 91m
StmBfo of Lonp Laka. Ind 2190 W Waytaia «wd 473-4127 Sandy Jackaon 9la9 < 9.9m
Ufoatyta Counaaknp al Mound 2399 Blama Ava 472-3444 7 9ta9 < 9.9m
Jimmio'a Lounpa 3390 Shorokna Dr 471-7B9B JknmiaHaItt 9to9 < 9.9fP
Ad Ann Hair FaoNont 3394 Shorokna Or 471-B229 kkarboch Abraham 9to9 < k.tm
PWff •3419 Shorokna Or iB 471-0994 JaffNai SloO < l.tm
Lita Jano'a Hair Oooisn 3449 Shoralna Or 471 1040 BathCipaav Slot < 1.9m
Orono Shoppmp Carttor 2190 W Waytaia BNd 473-7047 BNWaar • lot 91 to 12.9m
Windward Froportwa 471 9497 Staphan Schmidt 9to9 •.9m IP 91m
Navarro Truo Valuo Hardwaro 3400 Shoralna Dr 471 9100 OalaJohnaan 9lo9 9.9m IP 91m
Champion Auto Storo 344S Shorakna Or 471-9932 RkAWood 9to9 9.9m IP 91m
A-1 lAnnotowiia Bontd 3907 Shorokna Or 471-9700 Slava Wagnar two 9.9m IP 91m
US hoot Ofhea 3429 Sherakrw Or 471-9090 Mary Cad 1 to 4 ladumwn at n
ABad Haahh hrofoaaionai 2190 Highway 12 474^109 OabatWi Kukharg 1 IP4 < 9.Sm
NadabyCmdi 2190 W Waytaia Vvd 479-1917 Ondithannan 1 tp4 < 9.tm
Rad Apron 2190 W Waytau Wvd 479 2206 ASaOragary 1IP4 < 9.1m
Roodatta and Aaaacioiaa 2190 W Waytaia 9Hd 479-0979 Garard Rowlana 1 W4 < 9.Sm
TLG Oaaay Carvna 2190 W Waytata Wvd 479-4939 Tami GrabN 1 104 < 9.Sm
RoBart HorWnp. CrA 2391 Mama Ava 471^193 RobartHardms 1 tP4 < 9.Bm
Holooma ^ambal 2393 Kama Ava 471 9420 7 1 104 < 9.im
TNacammumcaHan and tducaPan 2393 Mama Ava 471-0709 7 1 t04 < 9.1m
Fmn and Conway 2394 BImna Ava 471 7099 BradWaiavic 1 ta.4 < 9.Sm
Lady Bug Cipraaa 2399 BWna Ava 471 1114 KimWaaka 1tP4 < 9.1m
Ackarman’t WaWowt aral Marora 3392 Shorakna Or. Boi 9 471-7200 Slava Ackarman 1 104 < 9.Sm
Magic Cloanora 3399 Shorokna Or 47I-OOS3 OonMcCarvNa 1 Ip4 < 9.Sm
Ouakty Cloctronica 3412 Shorakna Or fS 471-9390 Cudia Fradrickaon 1 tp4 < 9.Sm
Waotonka Glaaa Sorvica 3414 Shorakna Or f 9 471-7389 KlrkNHton 1 to 4 < 9.Sm
Lakaahoro Intortora 3419 Shorakna Or 471 8446 PamCharba 1 to 4 * *1 < 9.Sm
UnRad Martial Arti 3420 Shorakna Or 471 0930 7 1 fa 4 < 9.Bm
Navarra Uquoro Inc 3421 Shorakna Or 471 8000 SiavanCorl 1 I04 < 9.Sm
Navarrro Lanaa and Tha Cnb 3429 Shorakna Dr 471 8911 OonScharvan 110 4 *
* *.
< 9.Sm
EHMif m&ern/Cm WMh/Aumnot»v« SwvioM/AuloiiiotivB %piir
OMokno SonMCB Station
Woo4 Mdion Coboiott^umilufo Slofo
SocmI Same#
Ormlung Raooa
Boauty Shop/Mtoc Nfonal toMco
*'Mao TaBt Htntal
Boauty Shop
NofwooMomtal BuiBinB Oporator/Ofocory Storo
Watarptoof OutovBomionia
HarBoraroMnt. Olaoa. Waipopof Sloro
AuM. Hama Itippty^lacthc ii Fowof gpuipiwont
fpiRpwiowl BamalAiarBwaro Stofo/Oth. NovoBy. SouvonMr
US Boaial Somtaa
Miac ^voonal Sofvioo
Boauty Shop
ColoiB Woc oiMioc Batai Storo
Aiwnii SpociaHy Sorvico
ABaorPainp Aponcy
Manapooiont ConatMnf Sorvieo
Cnwton tai Controia/llocuc Houaowaroa. Fana
Photocopyvip. Oupiicaiton/Buairtoaa Sorvico/Ta>apraph. Moatapa Comm
r. BuMnp MalohalaA*ac Homo FurmaNnpmoofmp. Shoot Motal
Apom lor Laundry. Dry Ooanora
Radm. TV Bopau
QIaaa. Qlahnp^aint. (Baaa. WaBpaparAAac Homo FurniiNnp
Floor Covormp Stora/Carpot« Uphultlary Oaaninp/faiot. Ofatt. Walpapof
Amuaomont. Wacroatton
Liquor Storo
Bowlinp ASay/Drmking Plaoa
ORONO BUSINESS DIRECTORY BY ZONING DISTRICT, 1997t4•< f.Sm< I.Sm< 1.9m>49 1.5m to 11m
19 51 to 52.5m
19 5.9m to 51m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
51 to 52.9m
5.9m to 51m
5.9m to 51m
5.9m to 51m
5.9m to 51m
1811< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5 Jm
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
< 5.9m
a < 5.9m
< 5.9m
.< 5.9m
< 5.9m
«< 5.9m
Woyzoto. 99391 B-1Woyioio. 99391 B-1Woytaio. 99391 B-1Woyiou. 99391 B-1Wt.^oiOL 99391 B-1WovBOio. 99391 B-1Wa^ioto. 95391 B-1
Wa/fotau 95391 B-1
Navarro. 99392 B-1
Novowo. 59392 B-1
Count
Woyaoto. 99391 B-2
WOVBOIO. 59391 B-2
Woytkiib 99391 B-2
B*2 Count
Waytoio. 59391 B-3
B-3 Count
WtviM 99391 B-4
Novorro. 99392 B-4
Woytoio, 66391 B-4
WoyiPli. 99391 B-4
Wayioia. 99391 B-4
Eaeolaior. 99331 B-4
EaeoWor. 99331 B-4
Woytkto. 99391 B-4
Woyioto. 99391 B-4
Woytato. 99391 B-4
Woyfoca. 99391 B-4
WovBOla. 99391 B-4
WPVBOIO. 99391 B-4
Waytoto. 99391 B4
B'4 Count
Woytato. 99391 B-9
Woyioto. 69391 B-9
Woyialo. 69391 B-9
Woyioto. 99391 B-9
Waytoio. 69391 B-9
Woytato. 99391 B9
Wtyiau. 99391 B-9
6147. 7S31. Si3i Gift. No»«itv. Sownii Shop/Waich. Clock. Jowoky ftopao/ Man's OothmQ. Fumnlwi Oo«vn Eotl Cfoltsmon•411 kwanco Agonl. Srokoi. Sonnco Alatalo kiouranca•111 Ugtl Sorvfco OroQOiy Kalor Law Offica•041 Offico. Cinic of Oociora kigrkii Chiropractic7212 Afama for Laundiioa. Dry Cloonors llonnMa Dry Oaanara•411 kiauranco Apam. Brokor. Sorvico Siata Farm Inauranca7371 Cwalom Compulor Propramming Sorvico LJ Ataoaatas
6SSU 7H9. S999 Bool Doaiar fWtak/Amua omowt RocroacioiWAiAomotiva Ooalar Mamaionka Jot Ski and Saa Ooo
•411 Inauranca Apont. Brokor, Sorvico Amartcan Family kiauranco
•941 GaaoBno Sonrico Stationa O' Sulbvan't Taaoco
4493. 5991. 7999 Manna/Boat Ooalar Aotailar/Amuaomant. Bocroation
9991. 4493 Boat Ooalar Batal/Marina
Marina4493
9411. 5421 Qrooory Bloio/MooiBFiali Morkat
1
9021 NotionaiBanli
•221 Baaoarch Cantor
•931 Baal Estata Apant. Manapor
•931 Baal Eatoia Apant. Manopar
9141 Orocory Oanoral Una Wfwlosaknp
•721 Acoountlnp. Audkinp. Boofckaapmp Sorvico
7399 Busina ss Sorvico
•021 Ollico. OkOc ol Oantista
•941 Tkta Aboiract Ollico
733B. 9721. 7399 Stonopraphic. Court Roponkig/AcGOuntino. Aiidrtinp. Bookkoapinp/Businoaa Sorvicaa
7999 Amuaomant/Baoaation
7331 Oiroct Mad Advortisinp Sarvtco
9139 Man's OolhinQ. Furrksivnpa WholasaBnp
9149 Grocorioa. Baialad Producu
9812 Eating Placo
9049 Compulart. EquoNnarH
9931. 9013. 7939 Auto. Homo SupplyiMolor VahKio Parts. Suppkas/Auto Rapak Shop
•011. 9041 Offica. Clinic of Doctor ol Moplcina. Chkopractor
•732 Commorclal. Economic. Socidpicai. Edu Bosoarch
3993 Sipna. Advoriialnp Oiaplay
Vatorkiary SarvicasiFarm Suppkos Wholasakng
LokosMa Marina
Windward Marina Cantar
North Shora Orivo Manna
Pick's Supor Valu
Fast National Bank-Tho Lakat
Gray Frashwatar Biolopical
BoAAoa A1 Ei^anco
Bumol Roalty Inc
IFM kic
Jamos T. Wlaon
Par inspactNKia
Enck Enplund DOS
Anchor Titla
AHamMivo Buaaiosa Sarvica
EIS Tanrva
Eapla Graphica Inc
St. Alban's Bay Craations
Boyal Amancan Foods
Dairy Ouaon
Appfcad Communications kic
Lowad's Parts-Pauii Phis
Navarra Chkopractic Olfica
Baaoarch Ouk Inc
Caco'a Vinyl Graphics
Laka Mmnatonka Animal Hospital
3467 Shorokna Or 3600 ShoraknaOr 3A00 Shorafaia Or 3600 Shorokna Or 3900 Shorakna Dr 3900 Shoralina Or 3609 Shorakna Or
3609 Shorakna Or
3412 Shorakna Or. Bos 124
County 19 and 19
3324 N Shora Or
1444 Shorakna Or
3222 N Shora Or
3333 Shorakna Or
2445 Shadywood Rd
2500 Shadywood Rd. Boa 100
2477 Shadywood Rd
3701 Shorokna Dr #209
2477 Shadywood Rd
2965 Lydiard Ava
2477 Shadywood Rd
2455 Shadywood Rd
2477 Shadywood Rd
3701 Shorakna Or
3701 Shorakna Or
3701 Shorakna Or
2477 Shadywood Rd
3701 Shorokno Or
3574 Shorokno Or
3499 Shorokno Or
3942 Shorokno Or
3496 Shorokno Or
3496 Shorokno Or
3502 Shorokno Dr
3572 Shorokno Or
471-7197 MamlBabo 1 104 < 5.6m471-9922 Chorko Andoraon 1 to4 < 5.9m471 7012 GroporyKaiar lto4 < 5.9m471-8222 LAPdpram 1 104 < 5.6m471-9993 RarthKukbarp 1 to4 < 5.9m471-0491 JmwtSymona 1 10 4 < 5.9m471-8679 LooRachta 1 to4 < 5.9m
471-7460 Slava Wapnar 1 I04 < 5.9m
471-9303 MUtaWaad 1 to 4 < 5.9m
471-9479 Jdm 0* Suknrmi 1 104 5.9m to 51m
471-9902 JanOurvi 10 to 19 51 10 52.9m
473-9249 Jm Mvora 9«o9 5! to 52.9m
471-2929 Bkhard Andaraon 1 to 4 < 5.9m
471-9473 Pick Bloommdtt 20 to 49 59fli to #10m
471-0111 OJOalanoySr.20 to 49 unknownor nM
471-8479 Stavan Eifanrakh 20 to 49 unfcnoom or n/ia
471-9948 DavW Poartuiaan 20 to 49 53.9m to 58m
479-0400 OarwktBay 20 to 49 52.9m to 59m
471-0494 ?910 9 52.9m to 59m
471-0947 JamaoWiaon 1lo4 < 5.9m
471-7934 f 1 lo4 < 5.9m
471-9209 Eridi Enplund 1 lo4 < 5.9m
471 7971 David Faoihuaan 1 to 4 < 5.9m
471-0099 f 1 10 4 < 5.9m
471-9908 f 1 lo4 < 5.9m
471-8931 Katfka Strand 1 to4 < 5.9m
471-8949 Slava Brown '1 to 4 51 to 52.6m
899-1200 AlanLoruon 1 to4 51 to 52.9m
471-7949 9 20 to 49 51 to 52.8m
471 8568 TomFrahm 9 to 9 52.9m to 59m
471-0195 JimBokala 9 to 9 5.8m to 51m
471-7728 William KUlborp 1 to 4 * ;•!< 5.9m
471-9399 JudyMarahik 1 to 4 < 5.9m
471-9304 CacakaLarkm 1 104 < 5.9m
471-0911 JanalBoahar 1 !0 4 ‘
a k.
< 5.9m
___J
ORONO BUSINESS DIRECTORY BY ZONINQ DISTRICT, 1997
mwfitu, tisti
MC mm
Ui^UlM.§fWt
Un|UlM.S89M
Uf«fUlMi.SSS8i
8712 fwmilurt SloiM Bay TumNiirt Cawpiwy
8^
•4
84
84
0782. 1281. 0782 Lmmn,ryKk Tiw
8712. 8718. 7288 W>or mnm 7iwiiiNn§»/8>
7811 0«M Han. Sm«M.
8041 Olhca. Chmc •! Otm •!
Otiaw OwOiwi IMtafy
Ocffrt Imartwi. Ine
SurOuM Oanoa ani 88nMa
Rama Chaaptactic
2880 SHarakna Of 471-8814 faaphaw Kiawaa 1 M4 < 8.8ai
2380 W WtylMa 8M 472-8428 CBfM Otiafi 80 la 88
2270 W Wayaaia 8M 472-1282 Oaiali OaMpa 10 aa 18 81 la 82.8IB
2380 W Wayiata 8M 448-8844 8aah Caa^Oal 1 ia4 < 8.8«
2380 W Waytala 8M 473-2888 ChMlMRanla 1184 < I.OfP
4
72
Lan8 Uha. 88288
Ufif Ulia. 88288
Ians Lakau 88288
tano Uka, 88288
Laaf Laha. 88388
• CaMal
1
1
f
1
1
8
8
2888.2888
4731
1711. 24M
7218
7348. 0782. 34
Waat TacK Inc
RaaNkiQa Afaa
lAlar Entarpritat. Ina
2808 W Waytaia Bfad. Baa 240
2728 W Wayraia 8Nd
2728 W Waytaia 8N4. Boa 337
2887 W Waytaia 8Lrd
2788 W Waytaia Blvd
472-1271 OaarfaMmlin
472-8808 AayFafBar
472-7288 Rayd ByaWWom
478-8212 Jia Dunlap
478-1870 iMaiMAaf
f00la248 ItOMlilBQn
80ia88 ISaiaallOai
SOW 88 88aaia810Ni
20IP48 M IP 12.8 m
1 la 4 < 1.84a
7rai|H TarwarAnf, Awanfaaianl
Aad«. TV. RAhahar Aapraaamaava
Wayaaia. 88281 ULIA 2088. 2714 Lalavalta Bay Camainy 3022 ShoraArm Or 471-0141 8rt«>8a4Bi 8la8 •J m la I1«
laaoUkai. 88288 m-IA 8881 diiacA AaUpaya tawaca liaar TAauaN 828 Loaf Si 47241280 ONnnaiaHIn 1 IP4 unknaam at iva
L8fi8Uk% 88288 ULIA 8724 VaAa CaanuMwcaaona. hic.740 N Broom Ad 472-5828 SeaR MakiflOi 1 ia4 < 8.8 m
lai« lalM. 88288 ULIA 7822 AaAa.TVAaaak Lahaalaw TV lOBONBroom Ad 472-1812 NafaMBaaror 1 IP4 < 8.841
Un8 Laha. 88288 ULIA 7288 OmOaar Chapai Na» T1iay«N CSaacli 828 Loaf Si.47241380 QtonnChonin 1 IP4 < 8.8m
laat laha. 88288 LM-IA 8411 Inaiaanea Afant Orakar. ianioi FrankAn Lila Incuranca
I1MoSa478-1088 OanOoarta 1 IP4 < 8.8m
WavMta. 88281 ULIA 8842 8aak8lafa Noland Four Ine.1388 0vanaLn 478-2234 Wdiard Nalan 1tp4 < 8.8m
Wayiaia. 88281 ULIA 7281 2888 N Shora Or 448-8880 CralBUndaB 1lP4 < 8.8m
Wayiaia. 88281 ULIA 7888 Amuaamant AaaaaOan 2840 N Shora Or 478-0080 f 1IP4 < 8.8m
mravraia. 88381 ULIA 4482 8a4or*a World liarwia wid Vachi 1888 Simroino Or 478-3443 OaryOaaanBa 1M4 < 8.8m
Waytaia. 88281 ULIA 8742 Vioion Laaraait Syaiaaia 1880 Spaiaa A«o 478-1010 kiaryOoR 1 la 4 8.8m
Wayniai 88281 ULIA 8788 laaaaaaf LaoMan aaomaOanal 1800 Brackatu AtM Ad 472-8200 LaeMRiAaad 1 IP4 8.8m la 81m
Wayiaia. 88281 LA-1A 8211 Saaialiv Orakar. Daahr Bkaa and Caadany 880 Old Lanf taka Ad 472-7878 Bruca Oayian 1 IP4 1.8m m 81m
lH-IACaaai 12
lacalalar. 88221 LA18 2788 CaawnareM Arkatoig Soft Waar for ScAoala 2888 Mapia Aalfa Ln 47141384 CadBaSmoac 1184 < 8.8m
Lanf taka. 88288 UL18 8288 Schaaia. lAicaliar^ Savicas Swanaon. Tauna. Hc^aaah and Ataoc.1378Charry R 471-8011 f 1 18 4 unknaamar n/a
taafUha. 88388 UL18 8411 Caaia Camp Toko 848 Tonkawa Ad 471-8218 Kaakiialmaan 1 184 unknaamar fVi
Laha. 88288 UL18 1821 Saigla 7aa«tv Mauaiwi Camradar 04m Buddara. Ine 528 Tonkarra Ad 478-8800 Ama HakA 1 M4 < 8.8m
Maiaii.88284 UL18 7288 ^ --------------m------------1--MMWH VSHPIQS Cyaiomimafa 888 Foraai Arma Ln 472-4822 1 1 IP4 < 8.8m
hdawia. 11284 ULI8 1784 Tara Excavatinf 4081 Hlfhwood Ad 472-4774 Fradarfck Jatmaan 1 la 4 < 8.8m
liaiaia. 88384 UL18 818*1 Nandiaakla Ooada Whalaaaki^818 ForoM Arma Ln 472 5481 hSkaMcOifatt iip4;..;i 81 la 82.8m
llaiaii. 88284 LA-18 8188 NanAaakla OaaOa AAialanain Inland Bacfv.1200 Widhural Tr 478-3528 Kathryn KruakapI 1 18 4 81 m 12.8m
Maiaii. 88284 LA-18 8047 Mi<icA HM.HiUM.WIW ABmd MaAcal Aaaocialion 878 Foroal Arma Ln 472-0481 DarloarMadta 1 184 8.8m la 11m
Wayaaia. 88381 LA-18 8811.8322 Ouamata AaaociairortaAndhadual. fmiy Sooal Sarvicaa Amarican CaiKor Sadaty 1700 Bolma Aalm Ad 471-7888 1 llaV.ipduiaam ar n/B
ORONO BUSINESS DIRECTORY BY ZONING DISTRICT. 1997
BS3t1 ui-ie 1799 Spactal Tfa4a Contraciof
W»ytBIB. BS3f 1 LAIB 9734 Cewpmar. Sottwart 9iar4
m-ltCMNl ia\
WvyMia. fl3f 1 UI-1C 7391
W«VBM ii3f 1 UI-1C •391. 9399 Ch4d Oav Cara 9ar«ica/9aaal Sarvica
MmC U3B4 LA-1C 7379
WvrtM Bi391 UI-1C •991. U11 Claach^laiaawiara. laaawiary 9ctiaal
WsvMM. §§391 UI-1C •991 ChMTCh
Wm««. §9391 LA-1C •991 ChM«A
WtVMla. §9391 LAIC 7399 •yainata Sarvioa
WmM §9391 LAIC 7319 A4«aniavi9
WbviM 99391
WavtaiA. 99391
LAIC
LAIC
•711
9992
9arvica
WcvMla. 99391 LAIC
w W A
1799
WtytM 99991 LAIC 7374 CaMpmar ^acaaaaif. Data ^aparaiiow Sarvwa
WvvMM. 99391
W«vB«C«, 99391
LAIC
LAIC
9092
7941 9991 9712
WWyutti. 99391 LAIC 0793. 0792 11J:!11W0VUIBI. 99391 LAIC 1921 9m#a Faaalv Hayamt CaMaiar
WSVMI9. 99391 LA 1C 7393 Haavv Conairuciian. f arthmovaig Eaupmara Aantal. taaaaip
Wm«tiU 99391 LAIC 9099 1f1Wsvnia, 99391 LAIC 9292 maaatma»4 AOvioa. Aaaaareh
WmM 99391 LAIC 9099 ?11m-iccM 19
WaytM 99391 LAIC-1 9111 LafalOarmea
W9VBM 99391 LAIC-1 9099 ilacifanic Farti. CampaiarA Whaliaalng
UI-IC-ICmrI 2
MaplB Mv 99399 fWI-IA 9211 Elamamarr. laaarmary 9cfital
UnfUks. 99399 AA1A 1921. 9734 Smpla FaMiy Mammp Camraciar. Taating laterMory
Ui^ Uka. 99399 AA-1A 7929. 9932. 7923 Aafiiparaiiaw 9ar«tca. AapavAlaad Mardianilaa Siora/Aafnparation Sarv^a,
Ii99li 99399 ftfl-IA 191 Omamamal Pkmmry Froducia
MapI* mm, 99399 WI-1A 792 Lawn. Oardan 9ar«4oa
MaplB 91am. 99399 RA-IA 7399 •uamaaa Sarvka
Mapla Flam. 99399 MI^IA 9099 Uactranic Farta. Equipmani Whalaaaiing
WmM 99391 AA-1A 0792. 1799 Lawn. Cardan Sarwca/Spadid Trada Camraclort
MI*1ACaMMi 9
WanaiA 99391 AA-1S 9941 Civic. Sactal Orpanitalian
LanfUh*. 99399 AAtA 9211 OamantarY. lacandari ScAaal
Uii9Uim. 99399 AA1I 9211 *'lamaniary. Sacandary Sctwal
Efdaw Campmar Sypport Cawipawp 3l99N8haiaOr 471 9923 TamCfdaw 1 la9
Avakm SoHwara 3230 9ohnaFamilli 471 0099 r 1 tad 9.iaili llai
3209 CaaeaCir 471-0121 Cheryl Flaaawdar 20IC49 •.9aa la 91ai
Sharairw lady Ciiddhaod Oavalapaiant3749 Sharaina Or 471 9941 TaraaaOadWa 9Ip9 < Mm
FCSIiap 3993 0iawyAaa 471-0319 7 1 IP4 < 9.9aa
Calvary Mamanai ScAaal 2420 Oiatwaody Ava 1 IC4 ledaipam ar WA
Gaad fhapard Lulharan ClaadK 3749 SharaAw Or 471-9433 LaranOavia I tp4 laWfipaM pr nAi
Kinpdara Ha9-Jaliavah*a Wiinaaaaa 3999 Tata fW 471 9199 7 1 IP4 tMlmeawarnA
Succaaafid Fraaamaaana 3199CaaeaOr 471-9917 9ob9avlan 1 1C4 < l.9«i
Skara and Aaaadataa 2429 Caaea Food Ad 471-0010 SlavaSkcra 1 la4 < I.Sci
AlanGraana Co 2949 Caaca Aaod Ad 471 9044 AlanCiaana 1 IP4 < •.§«
Tartdam Carp 3799 Caaca Fami Ad 471-0973 Oleli mAncm 1 ia4 < 9.9m
miaa CruaKara 2909 Caaca Faini Ad 7202411 JMi9awara 1 Ia4 < 9.9m
OSS 3020 Caaea Faim Ad 471-9492 Tarry Lindpran 1 1C4 < 9.9m
Aa Fnau-Tiaiac Ca 3399 Cryaul 9ay Ad 471 99P9 JALdrana I tc4 < 9.9m
•art Aadawmd Uphalataran 3443 CryatalFI 471 7302 9artABdawald Iia4 4 9.9m
3909 Ivy FI 471-7429 7 1 ia4 < 9.9m
Shap'a Carwtfuctian 2177 Shadywaad Ad 471-7009 7 1 ia4 < 9.9m
F9L Crww Sarwca 3799 Tata m 471-1090 m»mmrn 1fc4 < 9.9m
WMLSalaa 3199 Caaea Or 471-9994 Waywa Lundatraai 1IP4 91 la 92.9m
Lynaca-^aia Ladpar Sva 2990 Ounwoody Ava 471-7909 MichaallCaatt 1 tc4 91 la 92.9m
Ouddara Sarwca 3993 N Shora Or 471-9902 AaxAaadar 1 1C4 91 IP 92.9m
H9n0m and AMrian Law Officaa 3194N8horaOr 1 tc4 < 9.9m
Donwwi of Mmnaapafca 3949 Lyne Ava 471-9790 Achard Oa Lanay 1 IP4 91 IP 92.9m
Orano Early Chidhaod Famiy 7 479 3949 7 20 la 49 tadMpaMPtda
Graai Waal Maaiaa 929 Orchard Park Ad 479-9229 AwWy Waaatrand 1 IC4 < 9.9m
Oaug'a Appkanca Sva 4490 Watartown Ad 479 9414 7 1|c4
a
< 9.9m
Orona Qraarara 3749 Waiartawn Ad 4731211 Nad ButtarfiaW 1 ta4 < 9.9m
• 9uitarfiaid landacapa Ca 3929 Waiartawn Ad 473-9129 9 9ultarfiald 1 lc4 < 9.9m
Waal wood Sound Studio 4300 Waiartawn Ad 479-3192 Jamai Johnacn 1 la 4 < 9.9m
AF Commurvcationa 4799 Watartown Ad 473 9993 Oaruda Ealarty 1 ia4 9.9m ip 91m
Aapan Landacapa. Inc 4240 Sixth Ava N 473 9797 7 1ia4 ‘< 9.9m
Waytata Countiy Club 200 Wayiata Olvd E 473 9949 JafMOownay
•!
100 ta 249 iMknawnar Ida
Orono Middm Schoaf 999 Old Cryaial Oay Ad 44A9450 David Barwan 90 la 99 iMhnpwn ar Ida
Sdiumann Elamaniary School 795 Old Crystal 9ay Ad 449 9490 Cam Fladaland •Ola/ff unhnawnar Ida
ORONO BUSINESS DIRECTORY BY ZONING DISTRICT. 1997
Unttoko.SBJS«NN-1B B2II
W0gnM.SSSB1 NN-IB BB4I. ?9§7. Bsgg
Long Uho. BS JSB NN-1B Bill
tong Lite. SI9SB NN-IB BHI. B3M
tong Uho. SSm NN-IB B22I
tong UhmBf BBS NN-IB B22B
Long Uko. BB9BB NN-IB B2II
Long toko. BB9BB NN-IB BSBI
Woytoio. BB9B1 NN-IB S733. B3tt
WowWh. B8)B1 NN-IB B2II
WovMlO. BB3B1 NN-IB S0S1
Wovsoio. BB9B1 NN-IB B2BB. B3BB
Crgoid Boy. BBJ29 Bfl-IB •121
Oyitol Boy. BBS2S WtlB •121. 7H2
Long Loko. BBIBB NB-1B 7BBB
Moi0id.BB9B4 NN-IB 7B2
WOWWA. BB9B1 NN-IB •BBI
Woyioli^ BB9B1 NN-IB •211
WoyooML BSSB1 NN-IB •3SI
CryoidBoy. BB32J NO-IB 4311
tong Uho. BBBBB NN-IB B742
UiwUho.SBSBB NN-IB B3H
tong toko. SB3BB NN-IB 17SI
tong Loko. BB2BB NN-IB 7BI
twwloko.BBSBB NN-IB 41 IS. gggg
UfwLoho.BB9BB fW-IB 4213
tong toko. BBBBB NN-IB 07S2. ••••
UngLoho.BB2BB NN-IB •3SI
Uiw Loko. BB9BB NN-IB 1731. 1821
Ungtolw.BB39B NN-IB •Oil
Woyraco^ BB3B1 NN-IB •BBI
Woymo. BB3B1 NN-IB •BBI
Woytola BB3f 1 NN-IB 7B41.1881. 8712
Woytoio, BB3BI NN-IB •742
W99UU, BB3BI NN-IB 7828
Woytoio. IB3B1 NN-IB 1781. 1821
Woytoio. BB3BI NN-IB 1771. 17BB. I7B4
Woyiolo. BB3B1 NN-IB 8722
Woycoliw BS3f 1 NN-IB B2H
Orww Sanlw
CmifYCIi*
Mm
OM. S«IMt
CtMte
Mmmi reMMi
flwMiarv. 8tc on4>ry School
School, tducolion Sowmso
OCvOoMWM
MiMc Golf Coim
Aiwuoomom onS Hoc fooiwn
looov Oirion Sorvtco
ChiMii
nowomonr. toco wSory tc fnil
CMi Oov Coro torvico
UShoomSofM
Monofiwnr< ConoiMns Sorvico
Corporoorws
me
Dm hitoo Oopl.
Ororw CUv Ovi Oolofioo
Orono School OMcl
Tfwotv UHhorart Church
Moohwolor FounMort
Orono School Afo ChM Coro
AMf Conotruchon LLC
MmnoMlio Comor for iho Arts
Orono CHy Olhcoi
OroT¥> Golf Courooo
ChonoroO Loooms. Inc
NMotrooo Gorion Oooign
WorMfo Oootli
Orono SoocmI fOucoi«n
WMorf Sonny lOI School
UShoctOtfico
locol hoosor^sir Tn
TnickO^
Aiumm SooooNy SorvrcoAOi oc hotori Sloro
ChM Ooy Coro Sorvtco
ilictricol Work/Sinsit Fornily HoucOif Coniroctor
Poctroro c ^orts. Eqiapmonl Wholoislu^g
Church
Church
RoopholMOii. Fumnuro Wopou/Soot Oodor Aoiorf^uminoo Sloro
Miosorwom ConoiMny Sorvko
Ooctrlcol Aopou Shoo
ClipilOiins/Iinyis FomOy Houooio Consrocior
1111. 17tf. 17S4 Concroto Work/Soodd Trodo Conroctor/Eicoirotinf. FOundOlion Work
Houoohold Apoionco Store
AJoohoOco Anonymous
Wood Moducti ond Ororw Corrloyo
Londmork Bosun. Inc
Cdy View limousmo
StuObs MdMf ond Hmioo Movort
Dog House
Tnraty Moochool
Alitor Eloaric
Sygnot
Si. Edword Iho Confosoor Qtnich
Orono Conununny Church
Bonyon Unucod
Growth Morkotmg. Inc
MidtgHco Onrdung Sysloms
Suid-flHo Conotmcoon Sve
OuoBty Bosomont Wotororoofwf
Etoctrokic Solos end Sorwco
Atodor LoSuour
7B8 Old CryoM Boy Nd 448-0400 Cod SNuItt 8010 88 unknown or nM
lOOWoodNiNd 473-7333 BtnNoW SOloM wdMownoMdi
708 N Old Cryoiol Boy Nd 448-B380 f 2010 48 unknown Of ndi
2IOOSnnh AioN 473-0082 FodWdiWt 20 to 48 unknown or WN
27IOKoBy Fkwy 473 7710 QoryOioowich 10IOI8 unknown or Mi
2730MBvFhwv 478-2828 7 I0IOI8 unknown OMdi
•B8 N Old Cryoiol Boy Nd 448-8300 Thomothheh I0I0I8 wWnownor nfd
lOBOSMh Avon 473^77 Slovwt 04rd»«d I0IOI8 intknownorrdi
728 Statfi Avo N 448-0082 Nowol 8oortt 1010 18 wdMownornM
770 Old CryMd Boy Nd 448-8383 it Focior 1010 18
2888 Nomoy Nd ^^9 wmww rlMVf wICMVIiMil 1010 18 88mlo 3100I
2240 N Shoro Or 473-7381 AioiLran 1010 18 l.ilN 10 IlfN
2780 SoBy Fkwy. Boo 88 473 7387 NtnkMortO 8lo8 unknown or MO
288 Orono Orchordt Nd S. Boo 88 473-8804 Ntn Hofftrdiogtn 8lo8 unknown or MO
IB40ShnhA«oN 478 338B BrtdtoyHMon 8lo8 < 8.ini
4828 Worn Bronch Nood 472 8878 SlovoNuet 8lo8 < 8J«
728 8Mh Avo N 473-0240 FoidJthMn 8lo8 unknown or MO
708 Old CryMsI Boy Nd 448-8371 MronOroult 8lo8 wdoiownorMO
B88 Fornddo Nd N 44841040 7 • lo8 < 8.8ni
1388 Brown NdSoWh 473-2382 JuddhHuwNnt 1 I04 unknown or MO
IB8 Brown NdS 478-1317 f 1 I08 < 8.8ni
2780FoaSl 473-1313 7 1 104 < 8.8111
340 S OW CryMd Boy Nd 473-8481 NodrwyhMch 1 lo4 < 8.ini
108 N Orono Orchordt Nd 1 108 < $.im
3808 Wolortown Nd 1 I04 < $.im
188 N OW Cryoid Boy Nd 473-8427 Larry Sluhht 1 I04 < I.Sm
9808 W Woytoio BM 473-8028 Brian Fdmar 1 to 8 < l.lfO
2080 Sisth Avo N 478-2811 MordtUndo 1 10 4 < 8.8m
3888 84jilh Avo N 478-3897 BonMdnhordt 1 104 < 8.8m
240 Cywwt FI 4734)732 7 1104 •1 10 82.1m
888 Nrrddo NdN 473-2282 ity Hwotn Il04 unknown or MO
770 Old Oyiid Boy Nd 473-4328 BrucoOloon 1 104 unknown or MO
478 Fornddo Nd N 478-0000 Thomot Ow Froano 1 10 4 < 8.8m
878 Fornddo Nd N 473-2231 Gory Vara 1104 < 8.8m
2820 Foo Si 880-4824 Gordon Bdvor 1 104 •< 8.8m
2888 Foo Si 478-8887 7 110 4' ,,< 8.8m
280 Orono Orchordt NdS 478-1801 Wdiord Ndcho
.•
1 104 < 8.8m
870 Orono Orchordt Nd S 473-8801 Nogor Howkmoon 1 104 < 8.8m
2l80NShoroOr 473 8tgg 7 1 10 4*< 8.8m
ORONO business DIRECTORY BY ZONING DISTRICT. 1997
wdvuuk.tt2§1 Mi-ii §012
WtyMla. filfi WI-1B 720§
kiiJfi MI-tB 7§3
WavMMKttSf1 WI-1B §011
40
Eacmf PiBCB
OrfiBMiBfiul WhnM. Tr«B
Omn. CBrac «l Obciw •!
S«9lt Me Kami* CaMilNi
MMVlRMlaf
Tim 9mrmem
Lang tai%aia Oa
2240 N WHmm Ot
140SfiriihAM
§70 Wavtaia M W
I2§0WmMAm
440-0000 iii1 laO < •.§«
470-0222TMiNyfO 1 laO < $J%m
470-1272IMIMM 1 lo4 < I.Sfll
47t-0§l0iaiOaraUno 1 laO < IJai
Attachment B: BUSINESSES WITH MORE THAN FOUR EMPLOYEES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
iiccote Contact f ol tiwplovOT
WavfM*. 56391 Ml-19 Civic. Social Orgarwaiion Waytata Country Club 200 Wayiata f 473 8845 John Poaanay 100 to 249 unhnoaaw ot rWa
Long Lalia. 55355ML19 8211 Elamaniary. SoconOary School Oror«o Middte School 858 Old Crystal Boy Rd 449^9450 Oovtd Banaon 50 to it unknossn or n/8
Long Laka, 55355Ml 19 8211 Bmmnur,. Sdw.1 SOM—» O——Sdw.1 755 Old Crystal Bay Rd 449 5490 Connta Radaland 60 to ft unknown or n/a
LongLaka. 55355MI-19 8211 Elamaniarv. Sacondary School Ororto Saruer High School 795 Otd Crystal Say Rd 449^5400 Carl Shuns 50 to 99 unknown or fiM
Wayiata. 55391 ML19 8541. 7997. 8399 Cfvic. Social Orgamiation, Mamborahip WoodhOi Country Club 200 WoodNI Rd 473-7333 Ban Plaid 50 to 99 unknown or nM
Long Laka. 65355Ml 19 8211 Elamamary. Sacondary School Orono Community Education ?05 N Old Oystal Bay Rd 449^8350 f 20 to 49 unknoum or n/a
Long Lako. 55355 MI-19 8351. 8399 Raiidantal Cara/Social Sarvicat Orono Woodland!. Inc 2100 Si«th Ava N 473-0552 PaulPhiKpi 20 to 49 unknown or n/a
Map«a Plain. 55359 Ml 1A 8211 Eiamantary. Sacorutary School Orono Early ChOdhood Fam«4y ?479-3548 ?20 to 49 unknown or n/a
Waytaia. 55391 LR 1C 7351 Employmant AgarKy Ala«».idar Companlas 3205 Catco Or 471-0121 Cheryl Alaaandar 20 to 49 1.5m to llm
Long Uka. 55355MI-19 9221 PoNca Profaction Orono City Pokca Oapt 2710 Katly Pkwy 473-7710 Gary ChattMck 10 to 19 unknown or n/a
Long Lako. 55355RR 19 9229 Pubkc Ordar. Safaty Orono Dty Ova Oafansa 2730 KaNy Pkway 475-2828 ?10 to 19 unkrwwn or n/a
Long Laka. 55355RR 19 8211 Elamontary. Sacondary School Orono School Oistrici 695 N Old Crystal Say Rd 449-8300 Thomai Mch 10 to 19 unknown or n/a
Long Lako. 55355RR 19 8551 Church Trinity Lutharan Church 2050 SiHth Ava N 473-8577 Stavan Oamand 10 to IB unknown or n/o
Wayaau. 55391 RR-19 8733. 8399 725 Suth Ava N 449^0092 Pta-vai Saada 10 to 19 unknown or n/a
Wayiaia. 55391 RR-19 8211 Elamantary. Secondary School Orono School Ago Ch8d Cara 770 Old Crystal Bay Rd 449^9353 Jo Potiar 10 to 19 unknown or n/b
Wayiaca. 55391 MHO 6051 Mat all Sarvica Wholaiaing AME ConatructMm LLC 2555Ramay Rd 449-8965 Robert Vickarman 10 to 19 •Sm to 410m
Waytaia. 55391 RR-19 8299. 8399 School. Education Sarvica. Social SarvI Minnatonka Cantar for tha Arts 2240 N Shore Or 473-7351 Ann Larian 10 to IB 8.5m to Hfn
Cryatallay. 55323 MI-19 9121 City Govammant Orono Dry Olficaa 2750 Kaky Pkwy. Bos 55 473^7387 Ron Moorao 6 to 9 unknown or n/b
Cfyatal 9ay. 55323 Ml 19 9121. 7992 Pubbe Oolt CouTM Orono Golf Couriaa 265 Orono Orchards Rd S. Boa 55 4739904 Aon Sioffanhagan Slot unknown or n/a
Long Lako. 55355RR-19 7999 Amuaamant and Rocraation Chartarad Leasing. Inc 1940S4>th Ava H 475-3355 Brodlay Hanaan 5109 < 1.5m
MotmA. 55354 RR-19 782 Lawm. Cardan Sarvica HaMotropa Cardan Oaaign 4525 Watt Branch Road 472 5578 Stave hues Slot < b.Sm
Waytaia. 55391 RR-19 8551 Church Woodridga Church 725 SiMh Ava N 4730240 Paul Johnaon Sto9 unknown or n/b
Wayiata. 55391 RR-19 8211 Elamaniary. Sacondary School Oror>o Sgacial Education 70S Old Crystal Bay Rd 449 8371 Karan Orcuti Sto9 unknown or n/b
Waytaia. 55391 RR-19 8351 Chid Day Cara Sarvica Waldorf Spring HM School B55 Farndala Rd N 449-0040 ?5 to 9 < b.Sm
Waytaia. 55391 LR-1C 8351. 8399 Chad Day Caro Sarvica/Soclal Sarvica Shoraina Early Childhood Oavtiopmant 3745 Shorakna Dr 471 8541 Teresa Bocktt 5 to 9 < b.6m
Wayiata. 85391 LR-1A 3089. 3714 Platlic Producti/Moior Vahicia Parts Lafayalta Bay Company 3022 Shorakna Or 471-0141 Brian Badak 5 to 9 V 1.5m to llm
# ol fmployaaa LR-1A LR-1C RR-1A RR-1B Total
100 to 249 0 0 0 1 1
9010 99 0 0 0 4 4
20 to 49 0 1 1 2 4
10 to 19 0 0 0 8 8 •V
9 to 9 1 1 0 7 9
a
rota*1 2 1 22 25 a
r
m
Attachment C
S 10.20
-fc- 1. . . Antenna Structure. One independent ahtsinna
subo?dor combination of antenna attached thereto
servicing the principal use or structure on the
ano^hircustomarily incidental thereto that is not attached^to
not exceed provided the height of the antenna structure does
Inl 1^-ne . antenna structure is set back from any
Source: Ordinance No. 177
Effective Date: 6-5-75
Recidaani.;,?^^* Accessory Uses. Within any "R-lA- One Family
accessory structure or use of land shall
be permitted except for one or more of the following uses:
A. Garages. Private garages and parking space,
courts, and paddicks?°^®' swimming pool, tennis
/^masms!.,•«« Occupations. Any gainful occupation
I n^rcrtn^ pf the following requirements when engaged in only by
^^^Ifatro-^rc^ond-t^d-1EH^n^^e° p?«
' when evidence of the occupation is not visible from
' arf signs Other than those permitted in "R” Districts
excessive stock in trade is stored on the premises,
home occun;»^M«^*^ retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the
doac gained from within the structure, and the use
the drst\ic^fc^Vn^®Jh- character of the uses permitted in
his resida»nr*o ''^^ch it IS located. A professional person may use
of reliaionc; 4*1*^ Consultation, emergency treatment or performance
wLn tuch n.n f general practice of his profession
^ 'thrJl practice will involve the need for more than
v^tnree off-street parking spaces for the occupant and visitors.
Chapter Signs. Signs as regulated in the Zoning
Temporary Structures. Buildings temporarily
not to exce%I^Tm°e” °e ssr;Vor suc^h o"ons?tuc"ungf“
uses including aiiart^ "and fecora^Ut*"un^dscate°fertu«s “="'‘""^
foF sflio Roadside Stands. One roadside stand offering
farm products produced on the premises provided that
located at 200 square feet in area and that it isc ed at least thirty feet back from the public right-of-way.
Source: Ordinance No. 172
Effective Date: 1-1-75
ORONO CC 281 (4-1-84)
MON, NOV 3, 1997, 3i24 PMCONTRACTORS Attachment D PAGB 23APPROVED FOR COMPANY PHONE NUMBER NUMBER STREET CITY ZIP k ZIP^ID NIMBBR
BLOOMINGTON 55420-0000 18814228
MINNETNONKA 55305-0000 19301046
CHANHASSEN 55317-0000 14740197
DAYTON 55327-0000 14272197
PLYMOUTH 55442-0000 15594250
ISANTI 55040-0000 14445353
CORCORAN 55340-0000 14204591
EDEN PRAIRIE 55346-0000 19348536
WAYZATA 55391-0000 94718222
WAYZATA 55391-0000 94737326
MOUND 55364-0000 94726678
MOUND 55364-0000 94719124
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94753637
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94764819
ORONO 55364-0000 94726981
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94734746
MOUND 55364-0000 94725401
WAYZATA 55391-0000 94710568
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94041656
MOUND 55364-0000 94724653
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94750847
ORONO 55391-0000 94734000
EXCELSIOR 55331-0000 94717765
ORONO 55391-0000 94710940
ORONO 55364-0000 94725943
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94737050
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94751516
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94751441
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 90751516
ORONO 55356-0000 94766872
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 94766099
WAYZATA 55391-0000 14719795
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 14733617
MOUND 55364-0000 14723204
WAYZATA 55391-0000 14710405
MOUND 55364-0000 14725463
WAYZATA 55391-0000 14719376
WAYZATA 55391-0000 14710123
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74760123
WAYZATA 55391-0000 74734423
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74762706
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74751516 .
MAPLE PLAIN 55359-0000 74760457
MAPLE PLAIN 55359-0000 74766041
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74710773
MOUND 55364-0000 74724502
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74735621
WAYZATA 55391-0000 74710737..
MOUND 55364-0000 74724494
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74753669
LONG LAKE 55356-0000 74710202
WAYZATA 55391-0000 74764349
WAYZATA 55391-0000 74710445
ORONO 55356-0000 74750492
GENERAL
GENERAL
GENERAL
GENERAL
GENERAL
GENERAL
GENERAL
GERNERAL
/HOME OCCUP/2-97
HOME OCCUP/4-96
HOME OCCUP/9-94
HOME OCCUP/9-95
HOME OCCUP/9-96
HOME OCCUP/9-96
HOME OCCUP/9-96
HOME OCCUP/9-96
HOME OCCUP/9-97
HOME OCCUP/9-97
OME OCCUP/9-97
iOME OCCUP/9-97
iOMB OCCUP/9-97
iOME OCCUP/9-97
^OME OCCUP/9-97
<OMB OCCUP/9-97
ME OCCUP/9-98
HOME OCCUP/EXP09
HOME OCCUP/EXP91
HOME OCCUP/EXP92
HOME OCCUP/EXP94
HOME OCCUP/EXP94
HOME OCCUP/EXP95
HOMBONNER
HOMEONNER
HOMBONNER
HOMEONNER
HOMEONNER
HOMEONNER
HOMEONNER
KENNEL91
KENNEL91
KENNEL91
KENNBL91
KENNEL92
KENNEL92
KENNEL92
KENNEL92
KENNEL93
KENNEL93
KBNNEL93
KENNEL93
KENNEL94
KENNEL94
KENNEL9S
KENNEL95
NOODRIDGE CORPORATION (612
NOODSMITH LTD (612
NORTH CONSTRUCTION INC (612
NORNA, FRANK P. (612
NRIGHT ROOFING, INC (612
YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO (612
ZERULL TOM CONSTRUCTION (612
ANDERSON MIKE (612
PILGRAM LEROY A DC (612
MOOR TAYLON (612
HELIOTROPE GARDEN DESIGN (612
NORTH SHORE ROOFING U EXT. (612
ALLSTAR ELECTRIC (612
DANBY ASSOCIATES (612
LA VERE JULIE (612
REPKE ROSS R (612
ANDERSON CHARLES OWEN (612
ATTORNEY AT LAW (612
DANBY ASSOCIATES (612
DJ MAC SALES (612
HALLSON JOHN (612
MORNING STAAR SURGICAL, IN (612
SCOTT GINGER L (612
WALDRON LAW OFFICES, LTD (612
EVENTS EXTRAORDINAIRE (612
FITZPATRICK ENTERPRISES (612
MARMET SECRETARIAL (612
PFEILSTICKER DALE (612
D L R CONTRACTING (612
SHANNON JOHN (612
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT FRANCH (612
CUFF MARK (612
DALE MICHAEL (612
DERBY LORIN (612
HABAS BRIAN JOHN (612
HICKEY KENNETH (612
JERDEE ROBERT (612
NICCUM RICHARD (612
GREGORY PAM (612
HANSER ALBERT (612
NATHANSON ROSS (612
ROSSING ROBERT M612
KOKESH FRANK (612
PICKARD MICHAEL (612
RITCHIE NANCY (612
WAAG ROBERT (612
ALVORD MAXWELL E (612
ANDERSON THOMAS C (612
CRAWFORD RODNEY (612
MARIER L JAMES (612
FARAS AANTHONY (612
HOYER/ZOHARA (612
FACKLER SUZANNE (612
STEWART ROBYN (612
081-4228 10800 LYNDALE AVB
909-9512 2439 SHERWOOD HILLS RD
474- 0197 P.O. BOX 373
427-2197 13621 129 AVE N
559-4250 4735 NORWOOD LN
444-5353 ROUTE 4, BOX 385
420-4591 19365 MYSTIQUE DR
934-0536 7465 EDEN PRAIRIE RD
471- 0222 1795 SHADYWOOD RD
473-7326 735 FERNDALE RD N
472- 6678 4625 WEST BRANCH RD
471- 9124 3900 NORTH SHORE DR
475- 3637 3505 6TH AVE N
476- 4019 1680 NORTH FARM RD
472- 6981 995 WILDHURST TR
473- 4746 3300 WATERTOWN RD
472-5481 1295 LOMA LINDA AVE
471- 0568 3264 NORTH SHORE DR
476-4819 1680 NORTH FARM RD
472- 4653 4041 NORTH SHORE DR
475-0047 120 GOLDEN VIEW DR
473- 4000 475 FERNDALE RD N
471-7765 2620 KELLY AVE
471- 0940 1951 CONCORDIA ST
472- 5943 993 WILDHURST TR
473- 7050 2845 WATERTOWN RD
475-1516 130 CYGNET PL
475-1441 1830 LAKEVIEW TERRACE
475- 1516 130 CYGNET PL
476- 6872 2760 WHITE OAK CIR
476-6099 1680 NORTH FARM RD
471- 9795 3572 LIVINGSTON AVE
473-3617 261 CYGNET PL
472- 3204 1317 NORTH ARM DR
471- 0405 3645 LYRIC AVE
472- 5463 4640 TONKAVIEW LA
471-9376 3065 CASCO POINT RD
471-0123 2184 SHADYWOOD RD
476-0123 305 STUBBS BAY RD
473- 4423 1685 FOX ST
476-2706 2420 COUNTRYSIDE DR
475- 1516 130 CYGNET PL
476- 0457 4100 WATERTOWN RD
476-6041 4607 WATERTOWN RD
471- 8773 1075 TONKAWA RD
472- 4582 4760 W BRANCH RD
473- 5621 960 BROWN RD N
471- 0737 3550 NORTH SHORE DR
472- 4494 4705 NORTH SHORE DR
475- 3669 2775 WHITE OAK CIR
471-0282 975 TONKAWA RD
476- 4349 565 HANLON
471-0445 3700 TOGO RD
475-0492 340 LEAF ST
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNIOPAL ZONING CODE DY AMENDING THE
DEFINITION AND REGULATIONS RE: HOME OCCUPATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 10.02, Definitions, 30. "Home Occupations" be amended to read as follow's:
30. "Home Occupation"-Any gainful occu patio n meeting all ef the followi ng requirements
engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when that occ upatio n ta co nducted within the
principal struetufc only, when evidence o f the occ upatio n is not visible- fro m the street. No signs
oth er than tho se permitted in "R" Districta arc present, no exeesaivc stoc k in trade is store d on the
premises, over the co unter retail sales are net invol ved, and entrance to the ho me oc cupatio n is
gained fro m within the strueftire. A professional person may use his residence for co nsultatio n.
emergency treatment o r performan ce of religio us rites but not for the general practice ef his
pro fession when such general practice will involve the need fo r mere than three o ff-street parking
spaces for the occ upant and visitor s.
AN OCCUPATION WHICH IS CUSTOMARILY ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF A
DWELLING AS REGULATED IN SECTION 10.20, SUED. 4, ACCESSORY USES. FOR THE
PURPOSES OF REGULATING HOME OCCUPATIONS, A NONRESIDENT EMPLOYEE
SHALL INCLUDE AN EMPLOYEE, BUSINESS PARTNER, INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR,
OR OTHER PERSON AFFILIATED WITH THE HOME OCCUPATION WHO IS NOT A
RESIDENT OF THE DWELLING UNIT, BUT W'HO VISITS THE SITE AS PART OF THE
HOME OCCUPATION. HOME DAY CARE LICENSED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMANS
SERVICES (DHS) IS EXEMPT FROM THESE REGULATIONS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN
STATUTES, 462.357, SUBD. 7.AND 8.
Section 2. That Section 10.20, Subd. 4, Accessory Uses., C. be amended to read as follows:
C. Home Occupations.-Any gainful occu pation meeting all of the fo llow ing requirements when
engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when that oeeu patien is eendueted within the
prineipal structure only, when evidence of the oe eupation is no t visible from the street. No signs
othe r than those permitted in "R" Distriets arc present, no exeessive stock in trade is sto red o n the
premises, ove r the counte r retail sales ore not invo lved, and entrance to the home o ccupation is
gained fro m within the stnicture. A professional person may use his residence fo r consultation,
emergency treatment o r performance of religio us rites but not fo r the general practice of his
profe ssion-w hen such general practice will involve the need fo r mo re than three off -street parking
spaces for the oc cupant and visitors.
Home Occupation Draft
PC Work Session
December !5. 1997
page-1
'I
THE
HOME OCCUPATIONS SHALL BE ALLOWED ACCESSORY TO A DWELLING, §UBJECT
TO THE FOLLOWING:
►Hows:
Mirthe
>-«gns
tion ia
tation,
of his
etrking
OF A
I THE
DYEE
:tor,
OT A
•THE
4ANS
HMN
I when
tin the
coigns
onrthe
tion 18
tation,
of his
afking
PURPOSE. HOME OCCUPATION REGULATIONS ARE ESTABLISHED TO ENSURE
THAT HOME OCCUPATIONS WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CHARACTER
AND LIVABILITY OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT A HOME
OCCUPATION REMAINS ACCESSORY AND SUBORDINATE TO THE PRINCIPAL
RESIDENTIAL USE OF THE DWELLING.
HOME OCCUPATION REGULATIONS. THE REGULATIONS RECOGNIZE THAT
MANY TYPES OF HOME OCCUPATIONS CAN BE CONDUCTED WITH LITTLE OR
NO EFFECT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
A. THE HOME OCCUPATION SHALL BE AN ACTIVITY WHICH IS
CUSTOMARILY ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF A DWELLING.
B. ONLY THE RESIDENTS OF THE DWELLING UNIT AND NOT MORE THAN
ONE (1) NONRESIDENT EMPLOYEE SHALL BE EMPLOYED BY OR
ENGAGED IN THE CONDUCT OF THE HOME OCCUPATION ON THE
PREMISES. NOT MORE THAN ONE (1) NONRESIDENT EMPLOYEE SHALL
BE PERMITTED PER DWELLING UNIT OR TWO-FAMILY DWELLING,
REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF HOME OCCUPATIONS. DOMESTIC
EMPLOYEES SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED EMPLOYEES OF THE HOME
OCCUPATION(S).
C. EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS THAT CHANGE THE
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE DWELLING, ANY
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Og THE ZONING LOT SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
D. INTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS THAT ELIMINATE THE
IGTCHEN, LIVING ROOM, ALL OF THE BATHROOMS OR ALL THF
BEDROOMS OF THE DWELLING SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
E. THE HOME OCCUPATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED ONLY WITHIN THE
ENCLOSED AREA OF THE DWELLING FOR ALL ZONING LOTS IN THE
Rl-A, Rl-B, RR-lB-1, LR-1 A, LR-IB, LR-IC, LR-IC-I ZONING DISTRICTS.
IN THE RR-IA AND RR-IB ZONING DISTRICTS, HOME OCCUPATIONS
MAY USE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
STANDARDS:
Home Occupation Draft
PC Work Session
December IS. 1997
page-2
1.THE NATURE OF THE HOxME OCCUPATION AND ITS IMPACT
ON NOISE, LIGHT, ODOR, VIBRATION, AND TRAFFIC SrfXLL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD^
E
R
E
L
T
R
SI
R
THE HOME OCCUPATION SHALL CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE
ZONING REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
YARDS, SIZE AND LOCATION OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
F. OUTDOOR STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF MATERIALS, GOODS, SUPPLIES,
OR EQUIPMENT RELATED TO THE CONDUCT OF THE HOME
OCCUPATION SHALL |IM|BE PROHIBITED.
G. THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING AREA PROVIDED FOR THE
PRINCIPAL USE SHALL NOT BE REDUCED OR MADE UNUSABLE BY
THE HOME OCCUPATION. PARKING AREAS FOR THE HOME
OCCUPATION SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEWS OF ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
H. SIGNAGE SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO ONE NON-ILLUMINATED,
IDENTIFICATION SIGN NOT TO EXCEED ONE (I) SQUARE FOOT
IN AREA. THE SIGN SHALL BE PLACED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE
DWELLING.
NO EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, OR MATERIALS OTHER THAN OF A TYPE
NORMALLY FOUND IN OR COMPATIBLE WITH A DWELLING SHALL BE
ALLOWED.
I J.NO RETAIL SALES AND DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS OR MERCHANDISE TO
THE CUSTOMER OR CLIENT SHALL OCCUR ON THE PREMISES EXCEPT
WHERE ACCESSORY TO THE SERVICES PROVIDED, SUCH AS HAIR
CARE PRODUCTS SOLD ACCESSORY TO HAIR CUTTING, OR SOFTWARE
ACCESSORY TO COMPUTER SERVICES.
K. NO HOME OCCUPATION SHALL BE VISIBLE FROM ANY PUBLIC RIGHT
OF WAY, EXCEPT FOR ALLOWED SIGNAGE.
L. THE HOURS OF OPERATION OPEN TO THE PUBLIC SHALL BE LIMITED
TO BETWEEN 8:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M.
Home Occupation Draft
PC Work Session
December IS, 1997
page-3
.E
0,
THE HOME OCCUPATION SHALL NOT GENERATE EXCESSIVE CUSTOMER
OR CLIENT TRAFFIC THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE RESIDENTIAL
CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION, MORE THAN FIVE (5) CUSTOMERS
OR CLIENTS PER DAY MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE AN EXCESSIVE
AND DETRIMENTAL LEVEL OF TRAFFIC. THIS NUMBER SHALL APPLY
PER DWELLING UNIT, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF HOME
OCCUPATIONS. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE USED TO
DETERMINE IMPACT:
1.THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, INCLUDING
LAND USES, LOT SIZES, AND LOT WIDTHS.
2. STREET TYPE, WIDTH AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES.
3. THE AVAILABILITY AND LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PARKING
AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE HOME OCCUPATION
CONTRIBUTES TO ON-STREET PARKING CONGESTION.
SHIPMENT AND DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS, MERCHANDISE OR SUPPLIES
SHALL BE LIMITED TO BETWEEN 9:00 A.M. AND 6:00 P.M. AND SHALL
REGULARLY OCCUR ONLY IN SINGLE REAR AXLE STRAIGHT TRUCKS
OR SMALLER VEHICLES NORMALLY USED TO SERVE RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOODS.
NO SOUND OR NOISE CREATED BY THE OPERATION OF THE HOME
OCCUPATION SHALL BE AUDIBLE BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF
THE ZONING LOT.
P. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS iN EXCESS OF CONSUMER COMMODITIES
WHICH ARE PACKAGED FOR C< 'NSUMPTION BY INDIVIDUALS FOR
PERSONAL CARE OF HOUSEHOLD USE SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
Q. PARTIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF SELLING MERCHANDISE OR TAKING
ORDERS SHALL NOT BE HELD MORE THAN FOUR (4) TIMES PER MONTH.
PROHIBITED HOME OCCUPATIONS. THE FOLLOWING USES, BY THE NATURE
OF OPERATION, HAVE A PRONOUNCED TENDENCY TO INCREASE EEVIM)
THE LIMITS PERMITTED FOR HOME OCCUPATIONS. RECOGNIZING THAT
THESE USES HAVE SERIOUS OBJECTIONABLE OPERATIONAL
Home Occupation Draft
PC Work Session
December 15, 1997
page~4
rw AR aptfr ISTICS and THEREBY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURROUNDING
SSoOa TOE F™ OWING SHALL BE PROHIBITED AS HOME
OCCUPATIONS:
A. SERVICE, REPAIR^ ^AINTING,OF f ’
BOATS, PERSONAL WATERCRAFT. RECREATIONAL VEHICLES,
and snowmobiles .
B. BARBER SHOP AND BEAUTY SALON WHICH IS DESIGNED TO
SERVE MORE THAN ONE (1) C lENT AT TIME.
C. THE SALE, LEASE, TRADE OR OTHER TRANSFER OF FIREARMS
OR AMMUNITION BY A FIREARMS DEALER.
D. ADULT-ORIENT ED USES.
y
F.
HEALTH SALONS, GYMS, DANCE OR EXERCISE STUDIOS, AND
MASSAGE.
HEADQUARTERS OR DISPATCH CENTERS WHERE PERSONS COME
TO THE SITE AND ARE DISPATCHED TO OTHER LOCATION .
G, MEDICAL OR DENTAL CLINIC.
H. RENTAL BUSINESSES.
X
$
CATERING OR FOOD MANUFACTURING.
PORTRAIT STUDIOS.
CONTRACTING, EXCAVATING, WELDING OR MACHINE SHOPS.
L. KENNELS AND VETERINARY CLINICS.
M. TOW TRUCK SERVICES.
N. CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS
O. CERAMICS (KILNS 6 FT. OR GREATER).
Home Occupation Draft
PC Work Session
December 15, 1997
page~S
UPHOLSTERY.
(4) . SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR DISABLED PERSONS. PERSONS WITH
DEMONSTRATED PHYSICAL DISABILITIES MAY REQUEST SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. THE APPLICANT
MAY REQUEST A WAIVER OF A PORTION OF ALL OR ONE OR MORE OF THE
REQUIREMENTS. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY GP.ANT AN
ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER ONLY ON THE B.\SIS OF APPLICANTS PHYSICAL
INABILITY TO FUNCTION WITHIN SAID REQUIREMENT;
(5) . ENFORCEMENT. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON MAY NOTIFY THE ZONING
administrator IN WRITING OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS. WITHIN 1HIRTY (30)
DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF SUCH WRITTEN ALLEGATI''?;($), THE ZONING
administrator SHALL COMPLETE AN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE
THE MERITS OF THE ALLEGATION. WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS ArUTP
COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION, THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SHALL
NOTIFY IN WRITING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:
A. IF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DETERMINES THAT NO VIOLATION
AS ALLEGED OR OTHERWISE IS OCCURRING, THEN NOTIFICATION OF
THE DECISION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE COMPLAINANT BY MAIL.
B. IF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DETERMINES THAT A VIOLATION
IS OCCURRING OR HAS OCCURRED, THEN NOTIFICATION OF THAT
DECISION AND A TIME FOR COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SENT BY
MAIL TO THE VIOLATOR AND THE COMPLAINANT. THE NOTIFICATION
SHALL ALSO STATE WHAT ACTION, IF ANY, WILL BE TAKEN IF
COMPLIANCE IS NOT TIMELY EFFECTED.
Home Occupation Ordinance Draft
PC Work Session
December !5. 1997
page-6
o o
6
V. ,
\ ft »■ u
City of Of ono
Variance Checklist
1998
draft
Pre-Application
Preliminary meeting with Zoning Administrator
Date:_________________Time:____________
O Discuss with adjacent property owners
Application
Application submitted to the City before noon on;
Deadline Date. Planning Commision Meeting:
January 21
F^ruaiy 18
March 18
April 22
May 20
June 17
July 15
August 19
September 16
October 21
November 18
December lt>
Fd)iuary 17
March 16
April 20
May 18
June IS
July 13
August 17
September 21
October 19
November 16
December 14
January 19.1999
□
n
□
□
□
Paid Filing Fee:
Completed Application Form
Certified and Signed Current Survey
Property Owners List and Miuling Labels from Hennepin County
Sign Received/Posting Date:_____________
Planning Commission
You must appear at the following meeting(s) to represent your application:
Meeting Date:Time: 6:30 p.m.
Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway. Orono
City CouncU
Meeting Date:.Time: 7:00 p.nt
Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway. Orono
Vananct Application Form
Pag€-^1
r
Variance Process
Preliminary Meeting with City Staff
The variance must be completed in full and be either typewritten or clearly printed. The
application shall be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City
ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you are required to schedule a
meeting with the Zoning Administrator to determine the specific ordinance and procedural
requirements applicable to your application. Please call City Offices at 473-7357 to
schedule an appointment.
O Meeting Date/Time;______________
Notice of Completeness
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten (10) business
days of the application submittal. The applicant will be sent a mailed notice of application
deficiencies. Any missing information must be provided before the deadline date.
Adjacent Property Owners
You are strongly encouraged to discuss your proposal with adjacent property' owners
before submitting this application. An aclmowledgment form is included for you to give
to your adjacent neighbors to verify that you have discussed your plans with them. The
form should be completed and returned with your application.
Public Notice
The City of Orono is required by state law and city ordinance to mail a notice of your
application to all property owners within 150 ft. of your property. You are responsible for
obtaining a current, certified mailing list with labels from Hennepin County. A letter is
enclosed for you to provide to Hennepin County. Public notice will also be posted at area
post offices and published in the official local newspaper.
Posting of Sign
You are required to po<!t the sign provided by the City in a location that is visible fi’om the
front or street side of your propciiy. You must post the sign at least 10 days before the
Planning Commission meeting.
O Posting Date:___________________
PLEASE REMOVE THE SIGN AFTER THE CITY COUNCIL Ni. ^TING.
Variance Application Form
Page—2
r
* * * PETITIONER PLEASE NOTE: It is your responsibility tosend this letter to.Hennepm
County or fax it to: 348-9716
Date
Mr. Dennis Hill (348-3270)
Finance Division
A-600 Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear Mr. Hill:
Please prepare a certified list of the names
within 150 feet of the folio wng:
and addresses of the ov^-ners of all properties located
Street Address:
Legal Description
the fee for this service at:
Daytime Phone Number
After you receive payment for the list, please send it to:
City Planner
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
Sincerely,
(Name)
X :\wpwin60\wpdocs\forins\ltf ccrtl
j
r
SURVEY SUBmXTAL REQUIREMENTS
Cil A current survey signed and certified by a Minnesota Roistered Land Surveyor.
A civil engineer may certify a topographic survey.
For all lots, the survey shall include the following information:
a.
b.
c.
d
e.
f.
Legal description of the subject property.
Location of existing and proposed improvements with dimensions on the
subject property and within 30 ’ of all property lines.
Permanent iron markers at each comer.
All existing and proposed setbacks and dimensions, including accessory
structures, wells, septic sites, etc.
Existing easements, drjunageways, wetlands, right-of-ways, on the
property within 30 ’ of all property lines.
Scaled drawings and elevations of proposed floor plans and
improvements.
For lakeshore lots, the survey shall also include the following information:
8
h.
1.
J-
k
All existing and proposed hardcover in each setback. Hardcover
calculations must be provided in the application worksheets.
Proposed grading and elevations at building foundation.
Lowest floor elevation > 932.5 ft.
Designated Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL).
Average lakeshore setback and adjacent residences.
For unsewered, rural lots:
1 A primary and secondary septic site
Please provide 3 full-sized copies of your survey and 1 smaller (8 1/2** x 11**) copy.
Vananet Appbcanon Form
Pagt—3
J
r
VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM
File Number:______
Application Fees:
$250 for imtial variance
$50 for each additional variance
$150 for renewal variance
Aftcr-thc fact variances are double the basic fee.
The Administrator may require a consultant such as a traffic en^.
IrThi^or city assessor to review your application. You will be requned to pay for tins
service. City staff will notify you if a consultant is retained.
APPUCANT INFORMATION:
Name:
Mailing Address:
City/Statc/Zip:.
Daytime Telephone
Fax Number:____
NOTICE:
The applicant is hereby advised, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, Subd. 3(e), that
due to pubBc hearing legal notification requirements and the Plannmg
City CtLtil schedule, it may take 75 to 120 days
t J appUcation, you are acknowledging that you have rerf arrf faUy “J
admiiUs^tive process. You further acknowledge the fee explanation imd a^ * •
r^eived from the City pertaining to additional fees mcurred wtth tins
application.
APPLICANT’S STATEMENT
This appUcation should be processed m my name, and I am the p^ whom the City
should"ntact about this application. 1 have read mtd
With this appUcation. To the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have
provided are accurate.
AppUcant’s Signature Date
Vananc€ Application Form
Page—4
OWNER INFORMATION;
/.*
Name:
Mailing Address;
City/State/Zip
Daytime Telephone:
Fax Number;____
OWNER’S STATEMENT:
I am the owner of the subject property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation
or partnership is the fee title owner, attach a resolution authorizing this application on
behalf of the board of directors or partnership).
Owner’s Signature Date:
Please provide all of the legal names of the parties having an interest in the subject
property. This information will ^pear on the final resolution adopted by the City Council
and filed in the chain of title on the subject property.
LEGAL NAMES;
All persons having an interest in this property will be required to appear before a Notary
Public in the City Offices to sign all resolutions adopted regarding tMs property.
In addition to notifying the applicant and owner, is there anyone else ihe City should notify
on your behalf, such as a bai^, relative, etc.? If so, please provide theh name and address:
Name:.
Mailing Address;.
City/State/ Zip;_
yanance Application Form
Pag€—5
PROPERTY INFORMATION
The subject property was acquired on:
I (do) (do not) own the adjacent property.
Street Address of Subject Property;.
The title is; Abstract Torrens
Lot Size;sq. ft.acres
(An acre is 43,560 sq. ft.)
O Check here if there are wetlands on the property.
Wet acres___________________
Existing Structural Coverage
Proposed Structural Coverage;
Height of the Principal Structure:,_ft. to the midpoint of the roof
ft. to the peak of the roof
Services Avdlable;
Private WeU
City Water
Septic
Public Sanitary Sewer
□ Check here if a septic report has been prepared.
V<jfi(utC€ Application Form
Pof- Qj
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[Attach here]
;
VariancM Appiicatian Form
r
ZONING INFORMATION
□ R1>A
□ ri-b
□ LR-IA
□ LR-IB
□ LR-IC
□ LR-lC-1
□ RR-IA
□ RR-IB
□ RR-lB-1
□ rs
□ B-1
□ B-2
□ B-3
□ B-4
□ b-s
□ B-6
□ l
a
One Family Residential District (1 acre)
One Family Residential District (1/2 acres)
One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acres)
One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre)
One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre)
One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre)
One Family Rural Residential District (5 acres)
One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres)
One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres)
Seasonal Recreational (S acres)
Retail Sales Business District
Lakeshore Business District
Shopping Center District
Office and Professional Business District
Limited Neighborhood Business District
Planned Urban Development
Industrial District
Other
Existing Use;.
Proposed Use:
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation;
Variance Application Form
p<tz*~ f
VARIANCE TYPE(S):
Lot Width from to
Lot Area from to
Side Yard from to
Side Yard/Street from to
Front/Street from to
Rear Yard from to
Jleittht from to
Structural Cc /craRe from to
Other
Lakeshore Lots:
Averase l^eshore setback from to
Lakeshore setback from to
Hardcover
□
□
a
□
0-75 ’
75 ’-250 ’
250'-500 ’
500 ’-1,000’
Other:
V^arianct Application Form
Pagt- 9
$
r
STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP ^ *•
- i'9
The City Code states that a variance may be granted from the literal provisions of the
ordinance in instances where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
circumsUnces unique to the individnal property under consideration and when it is
demonstrated that such actions would be consbtent with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship means the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by this ordinance, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, would not
alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Economic consideration alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of thu
ordinance. Undue hardship abo includes, but b not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
1. Hardship
Please state why the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right and to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty and will not merely serve as a
convenience to you.
yarkutci Application
page^lO
2.Reasonable Use
Please state why the property cannot be put to a reasonable xise if used only under the conditions
allowed in the Zoning Code. How would the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance result in peculiar and practical difficulties or exceptional or undue hardship upon the
owner of the iot in developing or using such lot in a manner customary and legally permissible
within the zoning district in which said lot is located?
3. Exceptional Conditions of the Lot
What are the special conditions (shape of the lot, topography, etc.) that apply to the structure or land
in question that are peculiar to the property involved or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located?
Variance Applicction
page-II
f.*
4. Character of the Locality'
Explain how the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
S. Effect on Neighborhood
Will granting the variance impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,
unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street, increase the danger of fire, endanger the
public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values in the surrounding area,
or in any other way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance?
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY r/
In accot <ance with M S 13 .04, Subd. 2, “Rights of subjects of data’-f please be informed
that your request for a variance from the City of Orono may require you to furnish certain
private or confidential information. Please be infom..*u of the foUowing;
1.The information you provide vrill be used to determine your qualification for
the variance requested.
2. You may refuse to provide data, but refusal may require the City to deny the
variance.
3.The information may be shared with other governmental agencies, if necessary, to
process your application.
4. Any City Council action taken will become a matter of public record
5. Your legal name is required to process this application:
First Name Middle Name Last Name
Address
City State Zip Code
1 understand my rights as stated above
Signature
Variance Application Form
Pag€-^ I j
j
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form
I (we)
[print name(s)][print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at _____also referred to as Land Use Application No._________.
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's
project or use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
• f»
//
I (we)
[print namc(s)][print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No.________.
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s
project or use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
i
r
hardcover
In 1975. the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting the amount of lot area to can be
covered ^.ith hardcover. Hardcover is any impervious surface that does not allow for Ae ab^rption
of water. The intent of Orono's hardcover regulations is to ensure that rainwater will be cleansed
before entering lakes and protected streams.
A partial listing of both structural and non-structurai hardcover is provided.
Structural Hardcover
Buildings
Tennis Courts
Pools
Decks
Play structure platforms
Roofs, including some overhangs
Temporary buildings . j r •
Any vehicle, material, or equipment stored for an extended penod ot time
Non-Structural Hardcover
\ 3
Roads and shoulders
Driveways and any surface intended to be driven upon
Sidewalks and ramps
Landscape beds lined with plastic sheeting and weed protection fabric
Rocks and timber retaining walls
Patios and paver stones
Porous pavements
Instructions for completing hardcover worksheets:
1.Determine which of the four setback zones apply to the subject property. A separate
sheet is need for each setback area (0'-75', 75'-250', 250'-500 ,500 -1,000 ).
2.Enter the dimensions of each type of hardcover on the worksheet. Multiply the length by
the width to determine total square footage of each type of hardcover.
3.Determine the total amount of hardcover that is existing and the total amount that is proposed
in each setback area.
4.All hardcover that is located in the 0’-75 ’ setback zone is considered non-conforming unless
previous approval has been granted by the City Council since the 1975 hardcover ordinance.
K
*
5.
6.
7.
All plastic or fabric in the setback zones from 75 ’-l .OW is considered non-conforming when
the amount of both structural and non-structural hardcover exceeds the percentages for each
setback area.
AU non-conforming hardcover and plastic shaU be removed prior to receiving any building
permit, therefore, die "proposed" hardcover worksheet shall show the amo^ of hardcover
that will be in place after the non-conforming hardcover has been removed.
TTie hardcover worksheets must be filled out completely. Applications where the surveyor
has listed hardcover on the survey instead of the worksheet will not be accepted.
r
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250'250-500*500-1000*
FY1STING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House _____________
Length Width
X
X
X
B. Garage
C- Driveway.X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E« Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A __________ + B -------X 100
pnOPOSED hardcover in zone
House
Length •Vidih
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
+ B _X 100 -
in
S.Ff
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
%
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
%
A
B
A
B
o
.0^'
•V
^''
S 5.40
SEC. 5.40. HOME OCCUPATION...
Subd. 1. License Required. It is unlawful for any
person to engage in, or carry-on, a home occupation, as that term
IS defined in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code, without first
having obtained a license therefor from the City.
• ^*. Reg’ilation. Licenses will only be issued if
the specific use is permitted or otherwise allowed by the Zoning
Chapter, and if all conditions set forth in said Chapter are fully complied with. -s
Section 5.40. Home Occupations.
Subd. 3. License Period. All licenses for home occupations shall e.xpire on September
30 of each year. Application for renewal of an existing home occupation license shall be made
to the City Clerk at least sixty (60) days prior to the e.xpiradon date.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
ROLL
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present:
Chair Dale Lindquist. Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Elizabeth Hawn, William Stoddard, and
Lili McMillan. Janice Berg was absent. The following represented the City Staff: Senior Planning
Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, City Planner Elizabeth Van
Zomeren, Planning Intern Brad Bressler, and Recorder Sherry Frost Park Commission Chair
Susan Wilson was present Chair Lindquist called the meeting to order at 6:37 p m
The agenda was placed in priority order for discussion and was reviewed in the following order:
#1.3.? 5. 4. 7. and 6.
(#1) AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NAVARRE UPDATE
Bressler reviewed additional information to the Navarre Housing Repoit on affordable housing in
both Navarre and the City of Orono. The Met Council's standard for affordable housing fot 1997
was a maximum of $120,000, based on 30% of an average family's income for housing It was
determined that 75% of housing is considered affordable under this guideline by the assessed
value and 76% under market valuations of homes in Navarre.
Bressler reviewed the sub-areas. He noted the average property value in Navarre is assessed at
$107,000 and at $227,000 for the City at large There are 183 affordable housing units in
Navarre, which is 6.5% of the total housing in the City.
Lindquist asked what will be done with this information. Bressler said it has been presented to
Council. It will be used in the Comprehensive Plan update and for application for grants for
housing rehabilitation, such as the CDBG grant funding.
Schroeder asked if the Planning Commission would review the Comprehensive Plan update.
Gaffron indicated that the Commission would be involved in the process. The update is to be
completed by the end of 1998 as mandated bv the Met Council. Gaffron said the Council feels
there are minor changes necessary in the aieas of housing and transportation
Schroeder asked if there were expectations from Orono by the Met Council. Gaffron said he
received information on population and housing for the future from the Met Council. The forecast
received is not based on the needs outlined by the City.
Hawn asked if the housing in the affordable level was suitable for a family of four. Bressler said
the results are varying. Gaffron said according to the Met Council, 30% of housing in Orono is
considered affordable housing. The benchmark for cities of Orono's size is 60-70%, which is not
possible in Orono The percentage was based on a review of m? ny cities. Schroeder noted that
most suburban communities have sewers Gaffron said there ar>'' a lot of differences between
Orono and other similarly sized communities. Lindquist noted tho difficulty in comparing Orono to
other cities McMillan indicated that the lake was a large reason for the difference.
Stoddard said he was surprised by the low evaluations In areas and II. which include lake shore
properties Bressler said these areas include smaller cabins thr,t are being torn down and rebuilt
with larger homes.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#1 • Affording Housing in Navarre Study, Continued)
Hawn asked what will happen when property owners make application for variances to permit
these larger homes resulting in the loss of affordable housing. Gaffron said he has been
discussing this issue with City Administrator Moorse He noted that the City would be losing
ground on affordable housing when this occurs Smith questioned how property owners could be
requested not to build larger homes instead of maintaining affordable housing Hawn noted that
the lots are substandard, though have been receiving variances in the past Sn.ith acknowledged
that the larger homes will have to be allowed to be built if the housing meets code McMillan
noted that the lot size will minimize what can be built on these lots Schroeder indicated that
rezoning could occur. Hawn questioned whether the Planning Commission would be inconsistent
if variances are not granted in this area in a similar fashion as has occurred elsewhere in the City.
Smith asked if the City has a vision on what there should be in affordable housing. Gaffron said
he has no viewpoint at all on this topic; the housing is as it is. Gaffron said he has not seen the
Council making any conscious decisions to change their direction. He cited the example of the
Brook Park Realty Subdivision, where the Council felt the density was too high; and less density
results in less affordability.
Lindquist asked if this issue will be a consideration in decisions made regarding the
Comprehensive Plan update. Gafrron said the City will have to state what will be done regarding
affordable housing No numbers nave been developed as of yet
Schroeder noted that if sewering is used as a restraint in having affordable housing available, the
Met Council is contrary in its discouragement from expanding the MUSA. Gaffron said the Met
Council has discouraged 2 acre and 5 acre housing, which is not cost effective for providing
sewer to. This housing density has caused the Met Council to bypass the City in its development
to the west. He noted the Council and Met Council have not seen eye to eye on this issue.
Schroeder added that the 2 acre ?nd 5 acre density is done to protect the lake
Hawn noted there is alot of discussion regarding what the Met Council would like to see done.
She felt the City should want to have affordable housing for those residents needing it who live
and work here, and to enable those who have grown up in Orono to remain. She asked that the
City consider what we want rather than concentrating on what the Met Council wants. Smith
noted, however, that the City cannot have both 20% sewered properties and have 60% affordable
housing; this is a oxymoron.
Lindquist indicated that this information will assist in providing input for the update of the
Comprehensive Plan
Schroeder asked why this is being done. Van Zomeren said a component of the update is
housing. The cities around the lake have been discussing the topic of affordable housing and
pooling their ideas in providing such affordable housing somewhere around the lake This
resulted in the idea of reviewing the Navarre area
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#3) TREE PRESERVATION
Gaffron reviewed the information concerning the draft ordinance and the history behind tree
preservation He asked to review the information to see if the Pianning Commission is in
agreement with the goals listed and for direction Gaffron reviewed the list of exhibits provided.
The draft followed the example presented in the ordinance for the City of Shorewood with a
purpose statement and followed with regulations stated in an adopted policy as a resolution rather
than by ordinance The ordinance is one page with a 15 page policy draft. Gaffron reviewed the
procedure section, identification of spatial limitations, and methods of tree protection.
Gaffron noted that the goals may need additional work but asked if they and the development
onentation fit in with the views of the Planning Commissioners
Hawn voiced having difficulty with the first goal She noted that the federal government has
compensated farmers not to grow certain items and sees the goal in conflict in its designation of
limiting what can be done in areas without compensation to the property owners She asked if it is
fair or warranted to be able to designate large stands of trees to remain that are in private domain
without offering compensation
Schroeder noted there would also be an increase in the work load for variances requested.
Stoddard did not feel trees should be reviewed by the Planning Commission Gaffron indicated it
means that an inventory would be done on developed and undeveloped properties but would not
apply to existing residential properties. It may or may not apply for new housing on vacant lots
without subdivision. The inventory would provide what can be preserved but standards need to
be determined. If preservation cannot occur, Gaffron asked what would be dene for mitigation
and follow up on plans. Gaffron said he was not saying that the entire City would be inventoried
and determined what should or should not be saved
Schroeder and Lindquist noted there is a tree ordinance for the 0-75' setback from lakeshore.
Smith referenced the Dickey, Spring Hill, and Coffman developments She asked for an
understanding on how these developments would have been impacted by the ordinance and
policy Gaffron used Spring Hill Golf Course as an example, specifically the Big Woods With the
ordinance, an inventory would have occurred and the developer would have had to show what
was being preserved and what was being planted The property could still be developed but
would have required the extensive inventory. Gaffron noted that the end result may not have
been any different
Lindquist noted the satisfactory outcome of the Melamed Subdivision regarding tree preservation.
Schroeder indicated the ordinance would have prevented any clear cutting which could have been
done
Gaffron said the ordinance and policy would give the City a mechanism by which to define a
subdivision Smith noted that today, clear cutting can occur Gaffron agreed. Gaffron added that
the policy encourages homeowners to do what is right regarding tree preservation McMillan
noted that it is in portant to note that the buffe’ing was maintained on the Melamed Subdivision.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#3 Tree Preservation, Continued)
Stoddard said some developers leave significant trees while clearing out the brush. He would like
to see developers encouraged to do similar projects to Sugar Woods by developing guidelines to
follow. This would put the work load on the developer and builder rather than the City Clear
cutting guidelines could be offset with mitigation
Lindquist asked if the goal should apply to preservation of existing wooded areas. McMillan felt
the goal was more for preservation of the rural character of the City.
Hawn said community issues would be dealt with upfront by use of buffenng zones without telling
the property owners what they can do with the core areas of the property. This would place more
emphasis on property that comes in contact with other properties and residents
Lindquist said this could be used with creative methods to keep the area similar to existing
wooded areas today noting the land will be developed
McMillan felt that an ordinance restricting what may be the ideal building site would be too
restrictive. Linc ’quist agreed that this could not occur but tradeoffs could be offered The end
result may L< more trees
SmuL refer<mced the Coffman Subdivision which resulted in buffering be removed. McMillan said
this occur '«j after the development of the property. Schroeder asked if there were buffering
guidelines now for subdivisions Gaffron said the subdivision would be required to replant one
tree for every 40' of right-of-way. In a PRO, more tree replacement can be requested but may not
result in the creation of a buffer
Lindquist indicated there is general agreement with the goal with some differences as noted.
Hawn would like to see the ordinance where cutting of buffer areas is not allowed.
Park Chair Wilson said the tree preservation issue came from past Mayor Callahan, whose goal
was to protect the rural areas of Orono without restricting the people One way to accomplish this
is thr ugh preservation of trees. Wilson said she would like to make general policies for buffenng
and reforestation, targeting developers, by using a brochure with guidelines. She would like the
policy to protect trees without making it difficult for the property owner
Schroeder asked if this factors into whether land or fee is taken for park dedication. Wilson said it
did as far as buffering and trails are concerned Land is taken when it will enhance the area.
Wilson said she likes the idea of reforestation She does not want to make it impossible for
people to do what they want with their land Wilson feels that most people will do what is right as
they moved to the area due to the rural character of it She noted the slope and ravine issues in
Saga Hill.
McMillan suggested the policy come from a positive outlook. She would like to see natural
buffering with trees every 20' She noted once the trees are established, they gene'ally will not be
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#3 Tfm Preservation, Continued)
eliminated Schroeder responded that each area is different making it difficult to establish whether
there should be a 20' or 40* distance requirement for tree planting Schroeder does not want to
see the City having to make decisions on each tree Lindquist added that he feels most
developers are attempting to preserve trees and providing a buffer.
Schroeder asked if some ordinances were more restrictive Gaffron said some did not apply to
Orono He said some ordinances were fairly extensive in their preservation policies. Gaffron
suggested some steps may be circumvented. An inventory should not be done if the goal cannot
be met. Developers need to be given direction and standards by which to follow.
Schroeder noted that there is the perception that there is no problem on large lots. Gaffron
questioned why a policy if no problem with tree removal.
The second goal related to conversation. If the land is vacant, are we regulating it before
development.
Hawn asked what occurs if a property is purchased that has a large stand of trees and the
property owner decides to purchase horses and wants to cut down the trees. Lindquist cited an
example of a large acreage of woodlands where the property owner cuts it down to sell the timber.
Gaffron can forestry can be regulated if desired by putting restrictions on commercial use.
Lindquist noted that leB-ge amounts of timber were removed from Spring Hill. Gaffron said Spring
Hill recouped some costs by selling that timber but indicated that this war not the purpose for the
removal
Stoddard asked for consideration of using the conditional use permit process.
McMillan would like to see no clear cutting of properties over one acre in size.
Schroeder felt the probability of clear cutting tots is low due to the lots being worth less if trees
were cut down and result in creating an economic disadvantage.
Stoddard askeo what is done if the neighborhood is against what is being proposed regarding tree
removal. He suggested some g jidelines be established for forestry, clear cutting. CUP, and
neighborhood notification
McMillan felt trees are somewhat self-regulating in that people see the importance of trees.
Importance of specific trees, however, may be viewed differently, citing old trees found in the Big
Woods versus loss of one significant tree on Casco Point.
Stoddard cited the example of tree removal on a property in order to build on it He questioned
what is done in that case Gaffron said the owner can be encouraged to save trees or regulate
what happens to the trees. Lindquist felt it was not an issue of not being able to remove trees but
to save as many as possible, noting each lot has different requirements.
5
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#3 Tree Preservation, Continued)
McMillan felt the establishment of guidelines would work. Stoddard agreed. Lindquist felt
guidelines should be included. He suggested the use of a short ordinance with policy attached.
McMillan said she did not agree with the replacement policy with differing sites.
Schroeder said tree mitigation is useful as a bargaining tool in determining tree replacement
Hawn said she would like to see the focus remain on buffer zones as opposed to inventory ing,
noting the cost involved in conducting an inventory, which would be passed on to the buyers.
Gaffron agreed that it would be expensive to inventory trees
Gafiron reviewed the criteria used in determining compliance noted under "Procedures". #1-6, on
page 5 and the "Land Alteration Permit Supplemental Requirements". Gaffron said stating the
definition of a buffer and how it should be saved would be easier than inventorying what is on the
property. Lindquist said he would prefer the developer telling the City what his plans are. Gaffron
said a possibility is to have a policy with goals without the use of a list and formula and ask the
developer how he will obtain the goals. This, however, would give no guidelines. Hawn asked if
this could present legal problems Gaffron said that may happen.
Lindquist indicated that each lot is reviewed individually and sees the need to review each plan as
they are all unique.
Gaffron cited the example of the Sugar Woods Development and what could have occurred on
that property. Schroeder said the enormous amount of tree saving was accompi shed in part
because the property is sewered. Buffering on Brown Road was also a good decision in that
development plan. McMillan agreed that public good results from buffering Schroeder indicated
that it is conceivable that a developer or homeowner may not want a buffer. The Dickey property
was cited as an example. Schroeder said he would like to see the ordinance provide some "teeth"
by which to ensure that a buffer is provided. Wilson agreed that buffering would aid in preserving
the rural feel of the community.
Hawn asked if the present resolution refers to any subdivision or a subdivision of at least three
lots. Gaffron said a Class III Subdivision includes three or more lots A Class II Subdivision is a
lot which is split off from an existing property There is also a metes and bounds division.
Lindquist thought the policy should refer to subdivisions of two or more lots.
McMillan noted that the Brook Park Realty Subdivision for townhomes is an example where
buffering is limited by the right-of-way due to wetlands. The buffering will be closer to the homes.
This circumstance should be reflected in the code with definition of where buffers will occur. She
would like to see the code begin with buffering, which is not as restrictive, with further restrictions
added at a later date if found to be necessary.
Gaffron reviewed the purpose of the ordinance in Exhibit F McMillan voiced her satisfaction with
the purpose as stated. Schroeder felt conservation enhancement should receive more notice
Lindquist agreed with having the ordinance and policy. Hawn felt the last sentence under Subd. 1
should say "may" be required, rather than "shall".
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#3 Tfm Preservation, Continued)
Gaffron said the impression he has received from the Commissioners is that the policy is more
intense than they prefer with requirements going beyond what is desired.
Schroeder felt the main purpose is to preserve, protect, and establish wooded buffer areas and
not necessarily to protect significant stands of trees
Smith noted that the reference is to what currently exists on a property ra:her than what can be
added. Schroeder felt that buffering and tree preservation should be addressed first.
Hawn asked about the need for tree surveys. Lindquist said the surveying is mentioned in the
draft policy but may not be necessary. Gaffron asked and received positive feedback whether
there was a preference for defining the category or characteristics of properties that need
inventories. Hawn said she would like to know what it would cost to inventory a one acre wooded
lot. Gaffron said he would investigate the cost.
Smith noted that properties being considered for development survey wetlands Gaffron
explained how the costs have escalated in surveying Smith suggested identifying buffer areas
and what is in that area which would result in the focus placed in that area Gaffron said the goals
can be defined and include what needs to be inventoried There may be a need for selective tree
survey.
Wilson felt the Commission was on track in their direction taken regarding tree preservation. She
would like to see the review continue.
:#?) VARIANCE REPORT
Van Zomeren reported that the inventory of variances was over the past three years. The
majority of variances were in the LR-1C district, along Shadywood or Casco, for lot width and area
due to requirements being greater than the land platted The overall approval rate was found to
be 78.3% or 323 of 401 variance requests approved Van Zomeren felt this high approval rate
presents the question of what is being accomplished
Schroeder asked if the approvals were as presented in the applications Van Zomeren said that
approval rate was 70%. The inventory is broken down by vanance type and not by application.
Smith asked what the inventory tells us Van Zomeren said the inventory reveals that variances
are not an effective land use tool. However, Van Zomeren said the Council wants to review all of
the applications rather than codification. Van Zomeren said variances take away from planning.
She noted if the process is of value, it should be retained: but if not. it should be changed. Smith
asked if the process should be used to the point of where change can occur. Van Zomeren said it
is not the catalyst for change but should be fine tuned
Hawn indicated that there is little discretion available if sewer units have been granted on
properties in the past, even if the properties are substandard. It was noted, however, that these
applications usually require other variances as well.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#2 VARIANCE REPORT, Continued)
Van Zomeren said it is her opinion that the 15% structural coverage limitation should be strictly
adherec to with no variances allowed. There were 19 of 27 requests approved for structural
coverage variances. Van Zomeren questioned what was the hardship.
Gaffron referenced the opinion of Mayor Jabbour, who feels that if the standards are changed,
people will still request variances for more than what is being allowed The reference point is what
changes. Van Zomeren said she is not suggesting that hardcover requirements should change
but sees a correlation where changes would benefit. She cited the oversized accessoiy chart
includes what is reasonable but requires variance application for any amounts over that included
in the chart. Gaffron said the Council had made the decision to review those applications that are
not reflected by the chart
Schroeder asked if the Council and Planning Commission decisions were reviewed separately in
the analysis. Bressler said he analyzed the resolutions approved by the Council. Schroeder
asked what the variable is between recommendations made by the Planning Commission and
Council decisions. Gaffron said there is a 10-20% conflict in decisions and can go either direction.
He noted that the Council finds it difficult to deny a request that was recommended for approval by
the Commission. Gaffron said the Council prefers that the Planning Commission holds
applications to code
Van Zomeren said she questions the average lakeshore setback variance in examples where
there is no impact Gaffron said that variance has evolved to that point.
Schroeder referenced the 0-75' setbacK. There were 50 applications for hardcover variances in
that zone and 34 were approved. This standard received the lowest approval percentage.
McMillan questioned how many residents called about the possibility of a variance and did not
apply due to information received. Gaffron indicated that changes to plans usually occur before
applications are reviewed McMillan felt this was a likely reason why the approval rate is as high
as the analysis showed Van Zomeren informed McMillan that those applications that are outside
the requirements of the code are usually not seen. Gaffron said these plans are "tweaked" to that
point
Gaffron said the Council is concerned that there is consistency shown between the Planning
Commission and Council. The Council wants the Planning Commission to be on the same wave
length in thei.' considerations, which Gaffron said usually does occur
Van Zomeren said that the purpose of zoning is to protect property rights and ensure compatibility
between land jses She noted that a high rate of variances places a burden on neighbors, and
not necessarily on the applicant, to prove that a request is not good for the neighborhood.
Schroeder asked what the analysis revealed regarding where the Planning Commission fits in with
the Planning Commissions of other communities. Van Zomeren said the number of variance
requests are greater in Orono than in other communities. Gaffron noted that hardcover variances
8
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#2 Variance Report, Continued)
in Mound have increased with the hardcover regulations added Smith noted that while the code
is restrictive, the opportunity to get variance approval is good so residents take the chance.
Stoddard felt Staff and Commission were in agreement over issues but felt there may be issues
that should be reviewed by the Commission. Schroeder noted that all residents have the right to
file for a variance Gaffron voiced concern that if residents are informed of the standard and yet
understand changes can be made to that standard, what then is the standard
Smith asked if there were variances where restrictions may be too tight but still be in keeping with
the code. Gaffron said that might be a possibility but is limited He does not believe a side
variance should ever be allowed on a small lot
Smith reviewed that there are four choices that can be made: The Comprehensive Plan can be
revised: the code can be made less restrictive, no changes made; or deny variance requests for
areas that are cut and dried. Van Zomeren noted that the State law requires a hardship be shown
to allow a variance
Lindquist brought fonward the issue of lake lots. Van Zomeren asked if the goal is to intensify tots,
noting lots with small cabins being replaced with large homes Lindquist said the 1500 s.f.
allowance for structural coverage can be adhered to on these substandard lots
Schroeder questioned why a harder stand would be taken regarding variances now. Smith said it
would show consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Schroeder felt the 1500 s.f. allowance for
structural coverage is consistent with tne Comprehensive Plan He noted, however, that
variances are worth money to the residents in terms of value to the property.
Lindquist asked if changes should be made or maintain standards currently followed. Schroeder
felt the Council should be consulted. Hawn said if all agree to the conclusions drawn, then the
Planning Commission should vote in that manner. McMilian noted the need to define hardship in
applications
Lindquist indicated if the Council is in agreement with the Commission 80% of the time, the
Commission can make the effort to hold firm to the ordinances. Schroeder questioned whether
any of the ordinances are irrelevant. He noted that in order to take a firmer stand, the
Commission should debate the relevancy of the ordinances Gaffron cited the average lakeshore
setback variance may be one that could be changed and brought before the Commission only
when there is an impact. Lindquist asked what happens if the ordinance requires the application
be presented to the Planning Commission Gaffron said the ordinance would then need revision.
Smith asked if the Planning Commission could make use of a consent agenda Gaffron said this
is not possible due to due diligence Hawn noted the audience could be polled Gaffron
questioned if the Commission defines those variances that are going to be approved, are those
ordinances necessary Hawn said it was a matter of saving time Lindquist suggested such
applications be placed first on the agenda rather than going by application number.
—9--.. .n — -f- -. -1- -I’t'>»ir
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#2 Variance Report, Continued)
Hawn asked if the Commissioners could arrive to the meetings with a list of items that they are
ready to approve Gaffron noted that the Council has a consent agenda. Schroeder felt that was
not possible as the Commission is not always aware of what will be controversial. Lindquist
suggested continuing in the same manner as currently exists.
Schroeder said with respect to hardships, he believes remuneration is important. He noted the
difficulty for applicants to state the hardship. Gaffron agreed that the applicant does not always
know what is the hardship.
(#4) SIC INVENTORY
Bressler said the business inventory was a study of the businesses in Orono based on standard
industrial codes (SICs) and are shown by zoning district The information is based on 1996
information.
Lindquist questioned whether the inventory includes all businesses. Van Zomeren said she did
not know. Bressler said agricultural uses are not listed and some of the businesses have gone
out of business.
Smith noted the number of people working from home.
Gaffron asked what source was used in gathering the information. Bressler said he used a listing
of businesses registered with the state found in the library. This did present a problem as the
businesses are listed by zip codes and Orono Coes not have its own zip code.
Van Zomeren said the list shows the creativity of the residents and the vast number of businesses
in the City.
Gaffron asked if there was a way by vvriich io total the number of employees in the City for
comparison with Met Council figures. Van Zomeren noted the difficulty in obtaining sound
calculations but the information could be used for Comprehensive Plan update.
(#5) HOME OCCUPATION
Hawn asked if the ordinance as written would ban Bed & Breakfasts in Orono. Gaffron said the
code would not allow it as it is not listed It would require a code amendment to be included.
Van Zomeren said the ordinance is written restrictively. She reviewed the definition as written of
home occupation The use is associated with the dwelling, which allows for discretion. The non
resident employee presents a correlation with coming to the site to work The definition shows
what impact is created by the home occupation and not by numbers. The ordinance requires that
the person conducting business at the home lives there
Smith said she favored the wording, "for gain". Van Zomeren said she found simplicity is the best
form to use.
oro .no planning commission work session
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#5 Home Occupation, Continued)
Van Zomeren said 2A is purposely vague. 2B allows for personal services to be provided at the
home.
Smith asked if the ordinance allows for only one non-resident employee or only one employee on
site at any one time. Van Zomeren said it refers to only one employee regardless of when there.
Smith questioned if the concern is with impact and not with numbers, whether there could be one
employee in the morning and another in the afternoon. Van Zomeren said there is no distinction
Gaffron noted that the ordinance is written to be very ••estrctive.
Smith asked if the ordinance is geared to what activity is taking place inside the home or the
impact on the neighborhood. She felt this could be problematic. Gaffron said impact should then
be discussed.
A typographical error was noted in 2C regarding the word “on" not "of.
Smith asked the purpose of 2D Hawn said it would eliminate the ability to turn the residence into
something other than a home, such as a warehouse. Smith questioned what difference it would
make on impact if it looks like a house on the outside. Van Zomeren said it would then be
perpetuating commercial use on residential property and made it difficult to revert to residential.
2E allows for uses on the west side of Orono, namely agricultural based businesses for storage in
accessory structures. It does not allow for outdoor storage. Van Zomeren informed McMillan that
accessory structures must still conform to standards. Van Zomeren cited the Holzer application,
where the plumber wanted to use his accessory structure to store his plumbing supplies. This
could not occur under current code but would allow him to do so under this ordinance
McMillan asked if the accessory structure does not conform, whether a variance would be
allowed. Schroeder felt it would be inconsistent to allow a variance for accessory structure and
not for home occupation. Van Zomeren said the intent is regarding storage and not tor office use.
Gaffron said it is not clearly wntten to understand that. Schroeder said he liked the idea. Van
Zomeren said this would allow riding lessons to be held in a bam. Gaffron asked about situations
where activities held in accessory structures Smith said that could not occur Gaffron asked how
to deal with uses currently being conducted. Schroeder noted there are also alot of businesses
with more than one employee. McMillan noted many businesses are also not registered.
Under 2F, the word "not" was deleted.
2G references lots where homes are closer together
2H, Van Zomeren questioned where the sign should be located. Stoddard suggested it be affixed
to the business. He does not want a sign by the road Hawn asked about the customer that finds
it difficult to locate an address suggesting limiting the sign size. Lindquist did not want to see a
road sign. No changes were made to 2H as written.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#5 Home Occupation, Continued)
McMillan felt 21 would present a problem for landscapers. Lindquist noted that the ordinance is
there to use for enforcement when complaints are received.
Van Zomeren said 2J was written to eliminate customers coming to the homes
2K would eliminate the business use being seen from outside into the home, such as racks, inside
signs in windows or in yards.
Stoddard felt the hours of operation were late. Hawn noted the need for the hours for giving
private lessons such as piano.
Gaffron indicated that the number is arbitrary under 2M. Commissioners felt no changes were
necessary to 2M, N. or O.
2P referenced a call received on cleaning supplies. Smith questioned whether the supplies were
'hazardous. Van Zomeren said with chem'cals. problems may occur. There was discussion
u' oarding what is considered hazardous materials and quantities allowed. It was determined to
t-.-. a question of re-bottling chemicals They may need to be stored in approved containers.
Commissioners felt re-bohling should not be allowed
2Q was written to eliminate having boutiques held on a consistent schedule impacting the
neighborhood.
The list of prohibited businesses were reviewed. Gaffron questioned whether 2C would be
restricted. There are firearm dealers currently licensed in the City. Gaffron will investigate this
issue.
E was eliminated. Commissioners felt these businesses should be allowed. I, J, and K were also
eliminated
Commissioners had different views regarding contracting, excavating, welding and machine shops
(K), Schroeder noted that ♦hese businesses provide a service. Gaffron indicated there are some
business owners who would otherwise find it difficult to survive in these types of businesses if they
have to rent facilities elsewhere. Stoddard asked if this addresses the size of the warehouse.
Van Zomeren said the code already covers that issue. This applies to all districts, which was
discussed. Size of properties was also discussed
O limited the size of the kiln to keep it manageable.
P was also eliminated as Hawn and Schroeder said they were not opposed to this business being
conducted. Van Zomeren noted that this business could become noisy with the use of a staple
gun Schroeder said the noise would not be more than noise conducted by a contractor. Van
Zomeren indicated that this would be on-going, however, and include storage of fabric as well.
McMillan referenced the noise ordinance, which could be utilized if noise problems occur.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#5 Home Occupation, Continued)
#4 shows a deference to demonstrated disabilit/ where this would be the only opportunity to
conduct business.
#5 allows for any complaints to be in writing #5A was amended to include notification of the
complaint to the alleged violator.
Smith asked what occurs under 5B. She was informed thet a notice of zoning violation is sent, the
section of the code is cited, and process is followed for zoning violation. Schroeder asked how it
would be enforced. Smith asked if complaints have always been mailed This has not occurred
but will in the future She asked if a copy of the complaint will bo sent to both the violator and
complainant. Gaffron questioned whether the law preserves the c-nonymity of the complainer. If
so, he feels this has to be respected that information received beco.nes public property Van
Zomeren said the intent was to eliminate the need to follow up on all phone calls. Lindquist said
he would not investigate an anonymous call. Van Zomeren and Gaffron said this occurs
frequently Gaffron informed Schroeder that they follow up on complaints Calls are investigated
to determine whether a problem exists. Srn>oeder said many people will not want io write a letter.
Van Zomeren questioned how follow up car- occur McMillan suggested getting advice from City
Attorney Barrett Van Zomeren said she would like to eliminate what is currently in the code.
Lindquist. Schroeder, and Smith agreed Hawn suggested the use of a fee.
Smith asked what happens to businesses that are currently in effect that are not allowed under
the ordinance. Gaffron said an amortization schedule could be used or be grandfathered in and
acknowledged for the record Schroeder leferenced the use of marina licensing in order to
correct deficiencies, which has not worked. Van Zomeren said licensing is viewed as a privilege
but working-at-home is considered a property right Stoddard said he felt a fee creates an added
buiden. Van Zomeren said the $30 licensing fee is to cover the expense of investigating the
business
Smith asked if a determination has been made regarding the use of plumbing in an accessory
structure as a side line business Gaffron said it has not McMillan suggested reviewing the issue
of grandfathering in a business Lindquist noted that a person cannot be put out of business.
McMillan asked about businesses that are non-conforming Lindquist said they should be allowed
to show conformity Lindquist said new businesses that do not conform would not be allowed
Hawn suggested making it clear that businesses must register. Uses that are grandfathered in
will die Vn/ith that business owner upon death or retirement Lindquist agreed that it should not be
allowed to be turned over to another person
Gaffron asked that if the home occupation is not on the list and is a non-conforming use, should it
go with the property. He suggested this regulation be lightened
Smith questioned afffecting the livelihood or assets of a business. Schroeder said an argument
could be made if the business was sold to another person
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION ^ORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(#5 Horn* Occupation, Continued)
Van Zomeren cited an example of a home occupation license It includes a compliance deadline,
hours of operation, number of clients, and shipment and delivery. A use can be lawful non-
conforming until such date and then become unlawful non-conforming Schroeder noted the need
to have "teeth" in the ordinance.
Schroeder asked how many complaints are received on home occupations Gaffron said he
receives a few a year but gets many calls on starting businesses. Schroeder noted many
businesses are started without licensing Van Zomeren said many business owners do not know
they must license their business.
(#6) 1998 APPLICATION FORMS
The tracking sheet is included in this information Van Zomeren said information packets will be
mailed on Wednesdays in the future She indicated that the legal notice drives everything from a
staff standpoint.
Schroeder voiced approval with the need for applicants to provide all necessary information by a
particular date for review to occur. The 60 day time frame begins from the date of filing Smith
sakJ the time frame assumes all information is provided. Gaffron questioned whether the waiver
takes away from the right of an applicant to receive a conclusion to their application within the 60
time frame. Van Zomeren said no, the applicant was only being put on notice It does not refer to
a waiver. Van Zomeren emphasized that the applicant risks submitting applications on the
deadline date as all information must be complete. Van Zomeren said the survey submittal needs
to be reviewed.
Hawn askeo if the $150 renewal is per variance or total. Gaffron said he would need to review it
but it probably is $150 total.
Smith suggested an introduction letter be included She asked to see the final form and
suggested color coding the application Gaffron said the statement shows what is needed. Smith
said lines should be provided.
Pages 10, 11. and 12 were satisfactory to the Commission
Smith suggested giving definitions and examples of hardships Schroeder did not believe giving
examples would help McMillan suggested applicants speak with staff about any questions they
may have regarding h-^rdship Gaffron indicated that staff writes the majority of the hardships.
Hawn asked how the applicant is to determine who to contact for hardcover calculations and
survey. Gaffron said they are informed to contact a surveyor He noted the difficulty in providing
accurate information. Hawn suggested a work sheet be included.
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 15,1997
(«7) 1998 CALENDAR
1998 calendar provided for information only.
ADJOURNMENT
Hawn will attend the January 12.1998 Council Meeting. McMillan will attend the January 26,
1998 Council Meeting
Schroeder moved, McMillan seconded, to adjourn at 9 53 p m. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0
Dale Lindquist, Chair Person