The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-25-1996 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1996, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL 1. 7:00 p.m. Public Information Meeting - Bracketts Point Curve (County Road 15) Roadway Improvement I 2. CONSENT AGENDA 2. County Road 15 Orono Lane to Wayzata Border - Final Plans - Cooperative Agreement (J^ AtiAPPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of November 12, 1996 I9$e PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS • William Stoddard Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT C4. #2188 Mary K. Rice. 1570 North Arm Drive - Variance - Resolution 5. #2192 Robert & Wendy Beutler, 1331 North Arm Drive - Variances - Resolution /^6. #2194 David Alan Sutherland, 1365 Arbor Street - Variances - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 1. Change Order #1 - Lift Station #28 Extension of Completion Date CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 8. Lafayette Ridge Tax Forfeit Property - Resolution i 9. 1997 Fee Schedule - Draft Ordinance (Information Only) 10. Draft Noise Ordinance 11. 1997 Non-Union Compensation Adjustments - Resolution 12. Sag?- iiii! j'ark Access Alternatives 13. Fisv-^J » Mi' jes 14. Donation by Long Lake State Bank to Orono Police Department * 15. Recertification of Otten Brothers Assessment - Resolution * 16. Appointment of Public Services Director - Greg Gappa ^\1. Letter of Intent to Purchase Squad Cars <<18. Certification of Delinquent Utility and General Fees - Resolution Jf 19. 1997 Police Services Contract with the Cities of Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park . 20. 1997-1999 Police Services Contract with the City of Long Lake V /Vi. f AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1996, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (♦21.)LICENSES (*22.)BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EV ENTS 11/25 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 11/28 - HOLIDAY - Thanksgiving Day 11/29 - HOUDAY 12/02 - Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. 12/04 - Truth In Taxation meeting 7:00 p.m. 12/09 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Last Regular Meeting in 1996 12/11 - Reconvened Truth In Taxation meeting 7:00 p.m. (If Needed) 12/25 - HOLIDAY - Christmas 1 Public A ttendance Meeting D ate tviOU. i3S. iy?(o ^ Council Planning Commission Park Commission Other Please hll out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. rLA-**»-^ T iNEit UH I f 5.. 6. 7.. 8.. 9. 10.. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14. 15.. 09139S.4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^Ov DATE: No^^b^KRoii^ ITEM NO; ) Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: / Preliminary Plan For Bracketts Point Curve (County Road 15) Roadway Reconstruction Project Public Information Meeting After preparation of an initial preliminary design plan, the Bracketts Point curve roadway project was side tracked by the need to determine the location of Indian burial mounds adjacent to the road right-of-way that could potentially affect the widening or realigning of the curve. Hennepin County DOT has now located several burial mounds on both sides of the curve that have a substantial impact on the roadway project layout and cost. Hennepin County DOT has now developed a preliminary layout that attempts to improve the safety of the curve while avoiding the burial mounds. The preliminary layout will be presented and discussed in a public information meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m. as part of the November 25 regular Council meeting. The purpose of the public information meeting is to present information regarding the preliminary plan and to receive input from property owners adjacent to the proposed project. Revised Layout The revised preliminary layout does not increase the design speed of the curve. However, the layout does include the addition of 8’ shoulders which would improve safety by providing a wider area of pavement around the curve and opening up site lines. The shoulders would also provide a safety zone for disabled vehicles. The layout moves the right-of-way substantially to the east to avoid a burial mound on the west side of the curve. This creates substantial impacts to the properties on the east, and also requires very substantial retaining walls on both sides of the roadway. Increased Costs The revised plan requires substantial property acquisition and regrading on the east side of the curve. It also requires approximately 500 feet of retaining walls much of which are 8 to 10 feet tall. The cost of the additional right-of-way and the retaining walls would be substantial. Hennepin County staff will provide cost information at the Council meeting. Request for Council Action Continued page 2 of 2 November 20, 1996 Preliminary Plan For Bracketts Point Curve (County Road 15) Roadway Reconstruction Project -Public Information Meeting Benefits versus Costs Although the revised layout does provide for the addition of 8’ shoulders on each side of the roadway, it does not provide for any straightening of the curve itself. The design would provide some increased safety but less than initially anticipated. On the other hand the cost of the project has increased substantially beyond the level anticipated. Both the County and the City need to determine whether the benefits of the project are sufficient to warrant the substantially higher costs. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to provide direction to the County as to whether they should move forward with the roadway reconstruction project as reflected in the revised preliminary plan. November 16, 1996 Mr Edward Callahan Jr. Mayor City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 * S • ’ Dear Mr. Callahan: We would strongly urge the Orono City Council to reject Hennepin County’s proposal for widening the road surface and paving the shoulders of Shoreline Drive between Green Trees Road and Bracketts Point Road This is a project which over the years has repeatedly been opposed by our neighborhood While we recognize that safety is paramount, widening the road and paving the shoulders will make the situation worse not better The curve now acts as a natural “policeman” slowing down traffic to a reasonable speed A wider road and paved shoulders will result in traffic moving faster, endangering pedestrians and fisherman crossing Shoreline Drive by the Tanager Lake Bridge, Windward Maiina and the Minnetonka Boat Works Orono Marina Faster traffic will also endanger those living along Shoreline Drive who must turn in and out of their drivew ays and also put at risk the School Busses that stop in front of our homes We look forward to the Orono City Council ’s support on this important issue. Sincerely Your Neighbors, Robert and Iris Waade 1487 Shoreline Drive ' .,r; ^ V *.?((■ ('(. Eric and Susan Beringause 1489 Shoreline Drive I) ■'Vif Janet Kiernan 1491 Shoreline Drive Monday, November 18. 1996 04:50:43 PM Schmitt Music Page 1 of 1 Doug & Ellen Schmitt 1475 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 56391 November 18. 1996 Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator 2750 Kelle, Parkv/ay Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Moorse & The Orono City Council. Thank you for your recent letter regarding the proposed alterations of the Highvyay 15 curve just past our home, by Brackett's Point We wish to express deep concern with this project In our opinions this project v;ill do nothing but make our property more dangerous As it is nov/, this curve serves to slow the traffic and allows us easier access to our home If you straighten this curve, the traffic vyill accelerate and our lives will get more dangerous. We are also concerned about our three, young children. Currently the Orono School Bus stops at the top of our driveway and must also stop the traffic in both directions twice a day. Today it scares us to v/atch the cars and trucks screech to a halt v/ith the School Bus' unexpected stop sign. We can only imagine what it will be like if you cause the traffic to go faster' Please reconsider your plans to straighten this much-needed curve through our neighborhood. We don't need the heightened danger that it will surely deliver. Thank you for your time Sincerely, Doug & Ellen Schmitt **************** IMAGE RECEIVED ERROR **************** X REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^0,% DATE: ITEM NO: Administrator Reviewed: fM Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator_________________________________________________________________ Item Description: ^ County Road 15 Roadway Project - Orono Lane to Orono Eastern Border - Final Plans and Cooperative Agreement Hennepin County has now completed final plans for the reconstruction of County Road 15 from Orono Lane to the eastern Orono border. County DOT staff will make a brief presentation regarding the final design details and project costs at the November 25 Council meeting and will be available for questions. Construction Cooperative Agreement A copy of the construction cooperative agreement, setting out the terms of the County and city cooperation on the County Road 15 project, is attached. The main item in the cooperative agreement is information on costs and cost sharing. This information is shown as Exhibit A attached to the cooperative agreement. A. Costs The initial estimate of the city’s share of the County Road 15 project costs was $57,500 (for right-of-way acquisition). The current estimate of the city’s costs, based on the final project plans, includes $77,500 for right-of-way acquisition, $44,615 as the city’s share of the $2,166,000 construction cost, and potentially up to $83,867 for storm water ponding, flood plain mitigation, and wetland mitigation; for a total amount of $205,982. The amount for ponding and mitigation could be substantially reduced if the Femdale cut-off right-of-way property can be used for wetland mitigation as well as flood plain mitigation. The County is attempting to determine if this is possible in time for the November 25 Council meeting. B.Parking Restriction The agreement calls for no parking on County Road 15 along the entire project area. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Motion to approve the final plans for County Road 15 roadway project #9222. 2.Motion to approve the construction cooperative agreement between Hennepin County and the city of Orono for County State Aid Highway #15 Project #9222. DRAFT Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 County Project No. 9222 County State Aid Highway No. 15 City of Orono County of Hennepin CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT day ofTHIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,19 , by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Orono, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSHH: WHEREAS, The County and the City have been negotiating to bring about the improvement of that portion of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) No. 15, between 200 meters west of Orono Orchard Road and the easterly intersection of Hillside Drive as shown on the County Engineer’s plans for County Project No. 9222, which improvement contemplates and includes grading, drainage, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, right of way and other related improvements; and WHEREAS, The above mentioned construction of CSAH 15 shall be identified as County Project No. 9222, (a.k.a. SAP 27-615-15) hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, The City has expressed willingness to participate in the construction cost of said Project; and WHEREAS, The above described Project lie within the corporate 1imits of the City, and WHEREAS, The County and its agent have heretofore prepared Engineer’s Estimates of quantities and unit prices for the construction contract work of the above described Project in the amount of Two Million One Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Four Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($2,166,400.00). A copy of said - 1 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 estimate is included in Exhibit "A“, which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1992, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: I The City, by executing this Agreement, approves the final construction plans for said County Project No. 9222. The County will advertise for bids for the work and construction of the aforesaid Project, receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisements and enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The Contract will include the plans and specifications prepared by the County. Ill The County will administer the contract and inspect the construction of the contract work contemplated herewith. However, the City Engineer of Orono shall cooperate with the County Engineer and his staff at their request to the extent necessary, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work. The City agrees that the County may make changes in the aforereferenced approved plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the City that the County may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the County’s contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project. Said changes may result in an increase or decrease to the City cost participation estimated herein. - 2 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 The City agrees to grant right of way to the County over those lands owned by the City that are a part of the required right of way for said Project. Said right o^ way shall be granted at no cost to the County. The County or its agent: will acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project. The final cost of all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project plus all costs incurred by the County in acquiring said right of way, permits and/or easements shall be apportioned fifty (50) percent to the County and fifty (50) percent to the City. The right of way costs incurred as described herein shall include all acquisition costs including, but not limited to, any and all damages occurring to any person or persons, including private utilities, in relocating or removing or adjusting main conduits or other structures located in or upon the land taken and within the present right of way; or damage in procuring such right of way, whether such damage is caused by the County or the City in the performance of such contract with respect to the improvement of CSAH No. 15 as shown on the plans for said Project. Damages, as used in this section, pertains to acquisition costs allowed by Minnesota Statute Chapter 117 and does not abrogate the meaning of the language set forth in Section XIV of this Agreement. The County will periodically, as parcels are acquired, prepare and submit to the City itemized invoices showing right of way and acquisition costs incurred by the County. The City’s share of said costs shall become due and payable within forty five (45) days after receipt of said invoice. The estimated right of way expenses described herein are indicated in said Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The City shall reimburse the County for its share in the construction costs of the contract work for said Project. The total final contract construction costs shall be apportioned as set forth in the attached Division of Cost in said Exhibit "A". It is understood that the Engineer’s Estimate referred to on Page 1 of this Agreement is an estimate of the construction - 3 - Agreement No, PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 costs for the contract work on said Project and that the unit prices set forth in the Contract with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the County shall govern in computing the total final Contract construction cost for apportioning the cost of said Project according to the provisions herein. In addition to payment of the City’s p-oportionate share of the contract construction costs, the City also agrees to pay to the County a sum equal to pighteen (18%) percent of the amount computed as the City’s share of the Lur.tract construction costs for the Project. It is understood that said add.tional payment by the City is its proportionate share of all engineering costs incurred by the County in connection with the work performed under this Agreement. VII After an award by the County to the successful bidder, the County shall invoice the City and the City shall deposit with the Hennepin County Treasurer, ninety five (95) percent of the estimated City share in the contract construction and engineering costs for C.P. 9222. Payment shall be made to the County by the City for the full amount due stated on the invoice within forty five (45) days of the invoice dete. Said estimated City share shall be based on actual contract unit prices applied to the estimated quantities shown in the plans. In the event the County Engineer or his staff determines the need to amend the contract with a supplemental agreement or change order which results in an increase in the contract amount, the City hereby agrees to remit within forty five (45) days of notification by the County of said change an amount equal to ninety five (95) percent of the estimated City share as documented in the supplemental agreement or change order. The remainder of the City’s shares in the engineering cost and contract construction costs, including additional costs resulting from supplemental agreements and change orders, will be due the County upon the completion of the Project and submittal to the City of the County Engineers final estimate for the Project. - 4 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 Upon final payment to the Contractor by the County, any amount remaining as a balance in the deposit account will be returned to the City; likewise, any amount due the County from the City upon final payment by the County shall be paid by the City as its final payment for the construction and engineering costs of said Project within forty five (45) days of receipt of an invoice from the County. All payments to the County must be postmarked by the date due or a late penalty of one (1) percent per month, or fraction thereof, on the unpaid balance will be charged to the City. The City shall pay the amount due as stated on the statement, notwithstanding any dispute of such amount. Should a disputed amount be resolved in favor of the City, the County shall reimburse the disputed amount plus daily interest thereon calculated from the date such disputed amount was received by the County. Daily interest shall be at the rate of one (1%) percent per month on the disputed amount. VIII The County will prepare weekly progress reports as provided in the specifications. Copies of these reports will be furnished to the City upon request. All records kept by the City and the County with respect to this Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. The County reserves the right not to issue any permits for a period of five (5) y»ars after completion of said Project for any service cuts in the roadway surfacing of the County Highway included in this Project for any installation of underground utilities which would be considered as new work; service cuts shall be allowed for the maintenance and repair of any existing underground utilities. It is agreed that the City shall, at its own expense, remove and replace all City owned signs that are within the construction limits of this Project. Removal and replacement operations shall be coordinated with the construction activities through the County’s Project Engineer. - 5 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 XII Upon completion of said Project, the County shall place the necessary signs and the City, at its expense, shall provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on that portion of CSAH No. 15 constructed under this Project recognizing the concurrent jurisdiction of the Sheriff of Hennepin County. Any modification of the above parking restrictions shall not be made without first obtaining a resolution from the County Board of Commissioners permitting said modification. XIII Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The County und the City’s liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self- insurance program. XIV It is understood and agreed that upon completion of the Project, all municipal sanitary sewer systems, municipal street construction and detention basin included in said Project shall become the property of the City and all maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter shall be performed by the City at no expense to the County. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, its elected officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the City owned improvements. - 6 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair nr replacement of the County owned improvements. It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers’ Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. XVI In order tc -oordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin County Engineer or his designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the City. - 7 - Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the City’s Director of Public Works or his designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as Maiscn between the City and the County. XVII The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. J - 8 - . j Agreement No. PW 52-08-96 CSAH 15; C.P. 9222 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year fi»*st above written. CITY OF ORONO (Seal)By: Mayor Date: And: Manager Date: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AHEST: By:By: Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board Date:Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM:And: Assistant/Co'inty Administrator By:Date: Assistant County Attorney Date: And: Director, Department of Public Works and County Engineer Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By:By: Assistant County Attorney Transportation Division Engineer Date:Date: - 9 - DIVISION OP COST SUMART HENM. CO. PROJ. 9222 CSAH 15ITEMimiTI EST.I QUAIi TOTAL I OMIT I ESTIMATED ;COST jPRICE !ORONOCOST HENNEPINCOUNTY1COST MCES (1)» 1 .. cost; ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS CONCRETE CURB A GUTTER. DESIGN 0424 CONCRETE CURB S GUTTER. DESIGN B424 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER. DESIGN B624 m 1 84 35 00 2.640 00 50 1.470.00,50 1.470 00 m 600 30 00 18.000 00 50 9.000 00 50 9.000 00 m 466 30 00 13.980 00 50 6.990 00 50 6,900 00 SUBTOTAL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS 34.S20.00 17,460.00 17.460.00 4 PRO^TA ITEMS MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 ii i 11 36.00000i 36.000 00 2 72000 96 35,280 001 FIELD OFFICE TYPE 0 EACH 1 8.000 00 8.000 00 2 160 00 98 7.840 00 1 FIELD LABORATORY TYPE 0 EACH 1 6.000 00 8.000 00 2 120 00 98 5.860.00TRAFFIC CONTROL EACH 1 70.000.00 70.000 00 2 1.400 00 98 68,600 00 i SUBTOTAL PRO-RATA ITEMS 120.000 00 2.400.00 117.600 00 STORM SEWER • 1 100mm PERFORATED THERMOPUSTIC PIPE m 1050 20 00 21.000 00 0 000 100 21.000 00 37Smm RC PIPE APRON/TRASH GAURO EACH 1 11 400 00 4.400 00;SO 2.200 00 50 2.200 00 1 i 300mm RC PIPE SEWER i m 47 5 80 00.3.SOOOO|0 000 100 3.80000 •* 1 375mm RC PIPE SEWER j m ;211 7*90 00‘19.053 001 50 11 9.52650 50 9.526 50 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G l m 20!550 00 1.100 oo;0 000 100 1.100 00 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN N m 1 139i 550 00 7,645 00'50 3.822 50 3,82250 CASTING ASSEMBLIES 1 EACH 1 16!300 00 4.800 00'50 2.400 00 50 2.400 00 t SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER 61.706 00 17.94900 43«849.00 \ MCES SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION LUMP SUM i!214.000 00 214.000 00|0 -000 0 0.001 100 I_ 214.000 001 SUBTOTAL MCES SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION 214.000.00 COO 0.00 214.000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY AGREEMENT NO. PH 52-08-96 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 1 OF 2 ITEM UNIT EST.QUAN UMTpncEHmCATION CONSTRUCTIONSTORMWATER DETENTION BASIN CONSTRUCTION (112 ACRE) FLOOD PLAIN MITIGATION CONSTRUCTION (TOWN ROAD)DNR WETLAND MITIGATION CONSTRUCTION (TOWN ROAD) WCA WETLAND MITIGATION CONSTRUCTIONSUBTOTAL MITIGATION CONSTRUCTION REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ITEMS SUBTOTAL REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ITEMS TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEM COST PLUS ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE , Jj/f STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN - ORONO 0 84 ACRE-FT . WAY2ATA 0 28 ACRE-FT Ylt Kffl <■ FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION tBAOter CUTOFF IS A POSSIBLE SITE ) DNR WETLAND MITIGATION - ORONO 1 214 ACRE. WAY2ATA 0 01 ACRE WCA WETLAND MITIGATION - ORONO 0 98 ACRE. WAYZATA 0 08 ACRE PERMANENTH^EMPORARY EASEMENTS TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL mmmpmESTNNATEOOHOHOcommrCOST%i COST %! . COST22.400 00 1 ^0 00 u»22.4000020,000 00 (3)000 100 20.000 0010.000 00 1 W.000 100 10.000 00000i (7)000 100 0 0052.400 00 000 52.400 30 j 1.683 282 00 1 0 1 100 ,1.683.282 00 1.683282 00 0.00 1.683^2-00 $2,166.400 00 $37,809.00 $1,914,591.00 8.800 00 (8) 43.00000 (5)16,87500 28.125 00 13.00000 W 7,50000 7,500 00 119.984 00 <4)50.49200 60.472 00 000 (7)000 000 170.000 00*t«) 1 77.50000 92,500 00 $349,964.00 $161,367.00 $188,597.00 $2,516,364.00 $205,982.00 $2,103,186.00 (1) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IS UNDER SEPERATE AGREEMENT. (2) *20.000 PER ACRE-FT OF DEAD POND STORAGE IS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BASIN. WITH FUNDING 100% HENN CO. (3) COST PARTICIPATION TO MITIGATE THE IMPACTED FLOOD PLAIN AT A 1 1 RATIO FOR CONST ITEMS IS 100% HENN. CO . 0% MUNICIPAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION IS 50% HENN CO AND 50% MUNICIPAL (4) COST PARTICIPATION TO MITIGATE DNR WETLANDS AT A 1 5 1 RATIO FOR CONST ITEMS IS 100% HENN CO . 0% MUNICIPAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION IS 50% HENN CO , 50% MUNICIPAL BASED ON PERCENTAGE MUNICIPAL IMPACT AS COMPARED TO THE TOTAL PROJECT IMPACTS. (5) COST PARTICIPATION FOR A DETENTION BASIN IS 50% HENN CO AND 50% MUNICIPAL BASED ON THE PROPERTY ACQUISITION NECESSARY TO CONST A BASIN TO ACCOMODATE THE MUNICIPALITIES DEAD POND STORAGE REQUIRED AS COMPARED TO THE TOTAL PROJECT DEAD POND REQUIREMENTS (6) COST PARTICIPATION FOR PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS IS 50% HENN CO . 50% MUNICIPAL BASED ON ACQUISITIONS OCCURING IN THE MUNICIPALITY. (7) ENTIRE COST FOR WCA WETLAND MITIGATION IS FUNDED BY BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES (8) 18% FOR DESIGN AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (9) 10% FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. » 1 CQ?T % $214,000.00 21.400.00 (9) : $235,400.00 HENNEPIN COUNT! AGREEMENT NO. PW 52-08-96 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 .. M«i I . ■■«»«■%»■»»CITY OF ORONO MSA STREETS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMSTREET C.I J>.1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BEYOND2005Watertown Road Culvert (West of Leaf St)S61.000 $0 $0 SO SO so SO to $0 SO to Old Oyslal Bay Road Bridjjc Approach S6Z000 $0 $0 $0 SO 50 SO to to SO to Old Qystal Bay Road I rail (Co. Rd. 6 to luce IJne)$0 so SO SO SO _so ______ SO 50 ____to SO to Brown Road (TH12toCo.Rd.6)$165,000 SO so $0 to to to to y SO T1I12 Safely Improvanents (Willow Dr to S. Brown Rd.)$185,000 so so SO to to so to to C.SA.H.6(RiEhl of Way)$0 $600.0-'$0 Jp.SO to to to to SO to CSA.II. 15 (ROW East I-nd)$0 $206,000 so so _______^$0 50 so to so to to CSA.II. 15 (ROW Bracketts Pt)SO SO $61,500 $0 _______SO to to to to to to Stubbs Bay Road (Co.Rd.84toni 12)$0 SO SO sp 50 to so so so SO si.ioauoo Willow Drive, including overlay (Til 12 to Co. Rd. 6)$84,000 SO so so _______SO to to to so SO S6oaooo Femdalc Road (Co. Rd. 6to 1-394)$0 SO S«X).(X)0 so 50 to so so so so so Willow Drive (Railroad Bridge) so TO BE CC SO iMPUm-D so BY MNIX so n’ IN 2001 ____to so to $0 ____to to to Walcrlown Road (Willow Drive to Sluhbs Bay)so so so so so to to so so to $1.6.5a000 s.i..3.5abooTOTAL$557,000 ^)6.(XXJ Sf)61.500 so so to so $0 $0 $0 M55A Budget (C'arry over)731.000 4.'tO.(XX)I (121.(xxr (527.5(X);(272.5(X);(17.5(X)]237..5fXl 4Q2,5rxl 747,500 1.002..500 MSA /Mlotmcnt 256,(XX)255.(XX)255.000 255.000 255.0(X)25.5,000 255.000 25.5,(XX)255,000 15.5.000 BALANCE __S4.30,000__ (S121.(XX);_(S527..5n0'(S272,5(*)j| (S17.5fX)j S137.5(K)__S4')2,500 $747,500 $1,002,500S1.257,.5(X) MSA-CIP updated 11/21/96 Nolc: P.I.R. I'und Kojid'Hridgc construction account balance at I/l/% is SI22.830 i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 12, 1996 ^0 N-7 X XT The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present Mayor Edward J. Callahan, Jr, Council Members J Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, and Charles Kelley JoEllen Hurr was absent Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Radio. City Engineer Glenn Cook, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Public Works Director John Gerhardson. and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p m. (*#1) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda. It was noted that Goetten had voted for denial of Application #2136 for the Greenfield Corporation. V'^ote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PRESENTATION BY AMELIA KROEGER Amelia Kroeger. Coordinator of the West Hennepin Recycling Commission, recognized the dedicated serv ice and contributions of John Gerhardson, who has serv ed as chairman of the commission She indicated that Gerhardson has always held the big picture in view for those on the commission, and worked diligently on behalf of all of the seven commissioners The award represented a salute to Gerhardson ’s service regarding env ironmental issues Another commission member, Sandy Larson, presented the award to Gerhardson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#2) REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 28, 1996 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of October 28, 1996. V'ote Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#3) CANVASSING BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 1996 Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Canvassing Board Meeting of November 6, 1996. Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Wilson stated the Park Commission is in the process of reviewing the park im'entory for final review as well as working with the Antoine Park neighbors to determine the needs of the park The building on the property and play ground equipment needs are being evaluated Wilson reported that ice rinks will be maintained at Casco Point, Hackberry , and Bederwood Parks The golf course club house w ill also be open for activities on Saturday and Sunday afternoons Callahan congratulated Wilson on her appointment as Vice Chair of the Park Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Janice Berg was present, along with Dale Lindquist Berg had no comments to make at this time PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (*#4) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3798 It was noted that while this resolution was on the C'onsent Agenda, Goetten had previously voted for denial of this resolution Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3798. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#5) #2176 DANIEL S. PERKINS, 55 LANDMARK DRIVE - RENEWAL OF ANNUAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3799 The applicant was present. Mabusth stated that a conditional use permit was granted during the 1994-95 winter season for the excavation of 200 cubic yards of material Applicant had originally presented a plan that called for the removal of a total of 2,000 cubic yards of peat over a ten year period At the time the CUP was granted, the Council did not approve the permit for a ten year period but recommended annual reviews The applicant was allowed to pay a renwal fee for the reviews rather than what is normally charged for a conditional use permit Dredging did not take place in 1995-96 season as the need for the peat ma'. rial was limited The contractor advised that he would only need 200 cubic yards of peai every two years. MIMUES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITA’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 - #2176 Daniel Perkins - Continued) Mabusth reported that the Planning Commission approved the current application which will complete the southern pond at 5,000 s f asking that the contractor grade the slopes at 8 1 and 5 1 as originally apnroved The next removal of material w ill be from the northern pond The Planning Commission was uncomfortable with addressing the issue of an extension to live years and '•ecommended review every other year and asked for Council to address the issue Perkins reiterated what Mabusth had reported He asked that the reviews take place every five years to simplify the review process for the StalT. He noted that digging would only occur every other year Kelley indicated his support. Callahan asked if Staff had specific concerns for requiring additional review s or if they were satisfied with a 5 year review period Mabusth said Staffhad agreed with Council’s recommendation of yearly reviews due to possible changes in regulations as the 150 acre wetlands could become redefined as a DNR protected wetland Mabusth indicated she w as satisfied w ith a five year period for rev iew w ith the stipulation that if any changes occurred in the regulations that it would trigger another review and possibly require DNR or Corp of Engineer permits She noted that the dredging on the property w as going slower than originally anticipated Callahan noted that the contractor may also change his needs in relation to how much and how often the digging occurred This and changes in DNR classification may be reasons for increased review s Callahan suggested an every other year rev iew process for this application, though he also favored the yearly review Mabusth indicated that the Planning Commission was in agreement with a rev iew every other year Jabbour asked if Staff would prefer seeing a time limit or a dredging limit to trigger a review Mabusth said Staff would recommend a land alteration permit for each excavation if the application was approv ed for a five year review. Mabu.sth said the 200 cubic yards of peat material limitation was satisfactory as the material would not lose its value She was in favor of limiting each excavation to 200 cubic yards Callahan indicated that the application as proposed would result in 400 cubic yards over a five year period and suggested an every other year review Mabusth noted that if the permit was for every other year, it would allow StalT to rev iew regulations periodically. Perkins asked if the every other year review would require a land alteration permit and was informed by Mabusth that it would not Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3799 with a review period of every other year. V'ote: Ayes 4. Nays 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 (U6) #2179 THERESA NORSTED, 2811 CASCO POINT ROAD - AMENDED VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3800 The applicant %vas present Mabusth reported that the application was for hardcover and structural coverage variances al(»ng with setback v ariances for the construction of a detached garage in the street yard and two level 7x10-1/2 ’ decks at the southwest corner of the residence The decks do not require any setback variances but do add to hardcover and structural coverage The decks would include access stairs. All improvements are located behind the average lakeshore setback Niabusth noted that no views are impacted upon adjacent residences Mabusth continued that the applicant staked out the garage location on the property and noted location of a tree on neighboring property near to the hack ot the proposed garage. The tree is approximately 70 years old Due to this. Norsted amended her application to reflect a change in the garage dimensions to 22* deep and 26' wide This results in no changes to factual findings The access stairs for the upper level storage area of the garage will be located imernally The garage is proposed at 1 8' but actually located about 22' from the trav eled road The neighboring garages are both located within 1' of the side property lines of property The building inspector rev iewed the site and found no problems that would require special needs such as a fire wall Kelley asked if the neighbors w ere spoken to Mabusth said both neighbors were notified through the application process both in July and October. One neighbor only asked it there was any encroachment of the av erage lakeshore setback. Kelley asked what type of tree was on the neighbouring property Norsted indicated that it was an oak tree Goetten responded that the 2' change in garage location would not matter indicating that she felt the root system of the tree would be aftected Kelley agreed that in his opinion the tree would be killed and hoped that the neighbor understands this. Norsted said she spoke with the neighbor, who felt the location was best for the garage. Kelley indicated that the applicant s' ould have the right to the iiaraue but was concerned with upsetting the neighbor W W Goetten asked how far the tree was from the lot line and was told 2' Jabbour noted that the garage was located 3' trom the corner. He was informed that there was room to move the uarage to the riuht but a mature tree on the applicant's property would need to be removed Norsted said she changed the dimensions of the garage to aid in not disturbing the root sy stem of her neighbor's tree, while not damaging her tree either Norsted said she was the one who voiced the concern for the tree. Goetten informed Norsted that she was not opposed to the garage being built. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO ClTi COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 (#6 - #2179 Theresa Worsted - Continued) Callahan asked Mabusth if the surv ey was satisfactorj'. Mabusth said the surv e>' w as current. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3800 noting the garage dimensions as 26\22' V’ote Aves 4. Nays 0 (#*T) #2183 CHARLES KRAMER, 2990 SOMERSET LANE - CONDITIONAL I SE PERMIl - RESOl.UTION #3801 The applicant was present Mabusth review ed the land holdings of the applicant which include three parcels, one being his homestead. The application is for a conditional use permit and does not require any variances The w etlands in question are of a type 7 .lohn Smyihe, an aquatic scientist with Bonestroo, reviewed the wetlands One wetland area was found to be degraded, and the proposed dredging would result in an upgraded wetland The other wetland was found to be untouched and not degraded Smythe recommended that this particular wetland should be left intact The proposal w ould result in a loss of trees Smyihe did suggest the buckthorn growth could be removed The applicant amended his application after receiving Smylhe's recommendation Mabusth reported that the Planning Commission recommended the alteration of only the one pond and denying alteration of the pond located in the southeast corner Conditions placed on the application include the spoils be limited in their removal to the applicant's property to the north only. The type 1 and 2 wetlands are to be staked in the field and a 26' separation maintained Both septic sites are to be protected and fenced off Erosion control is to be maintained until the ground cover has been restored Kramer indicated that he was satisfied with the Planning Commission's recommendation and stipulations Goetten asked Mabusth if there should be any specific wording in the resolution to maintain the "Hardwood Swamp" as recommended to be left untouched by Smythe to protect the land in the future Mabusth said the area is now identified as a "Hardwood Swamp" Type 7 and would be limited to only that now spelled out by such a classification Jabbour noted that the ordinances in effect now only prohibit the cutting of trees. Mabusth indicated that the wetland is not a designated wetland of the City but is protected under permit reviews by Corp of Engineer and MCVVD. City Attorney Radio suggested a conservation easement be placed over the property if the City wants it to be protected He indicated that the application process is the appropriate time in which to make this request Goetten said she would like to see this conservation easement be taken if Kramer was in aureement. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CU V COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOV EMBER 12, 1996 (#7 - ^^2183 Charles Kramer - Continued) The consei .ation easement was explained to Kramer by Radio noting it would bind Kramer and future ow ners to prevent any degradation of the property Kramer indicated that it was his intent to protect the property Mabusth said the easement does not say that the applicant is unable to do an>lhing but only requires the property owner to come before the City prior to making any changes The conservation easement would be filed against the chain of title of his homestead property Kelley commented that the request was putting the applicant in a difficult position and asked if Kramer would like the application to be tabled to allow him time to consider the casement Kramer indicated that he preferred to move forward on the application as it was in his plans to perform the work indicated as soon as possible Jabbour suggested that the CUP be granted and asked the applicant to w ork w ith Staff on placing a conservation easement on the property It was noted that there are no easements on the property at this time, and the recommendation of the conservation easement is voluntary and does not atTect the plans as proposed Jabbour informed Kramer that he sees the philosophy of the City and of Kramer as being the same and noted that if Kramer would like to see the property saved in the future, he should work with Staff on the conservation easement Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution ff380l Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was noted that while the applicant is not bound to a conservation easement at this time, he is bound by the conditions within the resolution (#8) #2184 BRIAN CARRINGTON, 1920 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VARIANCE - RESOLin ION #3802 The applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application involves a 3 3 acre rural property located on the north side of CoRd 6, the old VVoIsfeld residence The applicant proposes to construct a new residence and the old 20 ’\25' residence, constructed in 1910, would become an accessory structure Because the old residence is placed in front of the proposed new residence, the application requires a variance The residence is 115' from the street lot line Mabusth indicated that all plumbing and plumbing fixtures will be removed The heat fixtures will remain to heat the structure for use as a workshop as well as storage. The City is asking that a restrictive covenant be placed on the staicture to indicate that it will not be used as a guest house Mabusth indicated that such a covenant has been used in the past and was drafted by the City Attorney Goetten was informed by Carrington that the structure would be for personal use only. MINL'TES OF THt REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVTMBER 12,1996 (i!^I0 - #2184 Brian Carrington - Continued) Kelley inquired about the septic field Mabusth said all of the plumbing would be removed and tl .e septic tank would be abandoned as part of the new residence construction and septic permit for new system A new septic system will serve the new residence Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3802 V'ote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Callahan, after indicating that he had reviewed the election canvassing report, publicly congratulated those persons elected Goetten questioned what portion of CoRd 15 would be discussed at the next Council meeting Moorse indicated that both the east end and Bracketts Point would be discussed Jabbour asked for a determination on whether the City can bank newly formed wetlands for future mitigation He noted that landscapers are selling such properties as a result of its mitigation value Mabusth said Start' has been following through on such a proposal and asked Cook to respond Cook said such banking of land for ftiture mitigation was possible but dirtlcult to set up. He indicated that this will be accomplished as part of the comprehensive storm sewer plan and w ill require adoption of a specific policy Mabusth noted that there is an issue of whether the City w ould have to pay for the land and whether it would be set as a condition of the conditional use permit. Cook said he would not expect the City to have to pay for the land Radio said the issue could be part of the application process and not a matter of having to "take" anything. Radio said that the option legally and constitutionally is doable. Jabbour indicated that people are selling the land because of the need for mitigation Kelley questioned what w ill happen if people create a pond and then decide at a later date to fill it in. Cook indicated that a conservation easement would need to be placed on the property to prevent this MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 ENGINEER REPORT (#9) FEASIBlLm' STUDY AND SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE NORTH LONG L4KE SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION #3803 Cook \^as asked to report on the cost of the pioject Cook said the cost was estimated at $1,000,000 for 52 lots This cost reflects a $19,000 per unit cost for assessment, including both trunk costs, and lateral costs The lateral costs include street reconstruction where the pipe is laid, except Dakota Asenue which is being shown as a separate item as a result of the questions at the neighborhood meeting The trunk costs include the four units along Brown Road as part of the system that would hook into it some day in the future Kelley clarified that the four units noted are the four houses on the west side Jabbour asked if the cost was being isolated to determine the cost for a house not originally planned for sewer and located outside of the MUSA line but being requested by the property owner for inclusion Cook said the property owner would pay a trunk charge and a lateral charge in addition to the cost of running a line to the lot and from the lot line to the residence Callahan asked how many units were included and was informed by Cook the number is 55, Goetten was given clarification on connection points along CoRd 6. She asked if lot 30 would be served Cook said it would be served from tb.e same line as lot 31. Jabbour voiced concern with the possible connection of the lot on County Road 6 w est of North Brown Road He noted that the lot was not considered as a hot spot The property owuer had indicated that he wanted his additional lot to be considered buildable and the separate lot was now being segregated out Jabbour felt this would result in the property owner being treated diflerently than what was intended as there had been no plans to provide sewer to that property Moorse responded that it would depend on what the Council wants. He noted that the property owner would be charged the trunk and lateral charges and would also be responsible for any additional costs required to enable the sewer to reach the property. At this point, there would be only one unit at about $19,000. Moorse said if it was two units, the cost would be double. Goetten reiterated that the Council informed the property owner, Mr Maresh, that he would have to pay the full cost for the sewer hook up. . 1 MESUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITS COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 (#9 - Engineer's Report Feasibility Study - Continued) Jabbour indicated that the property owner should not have the right to appeal the cost Kelley agreed Jabbour went on to say that the City had taken the direction that the area was not to be a hot spot He indicated that while it was said to be the intent ot the owner to preserve trees by install .ig the sewer, the sewer installation would disturb the land and result in the loss of many trees Jabbour said he would support adding this property owner to the list but wanted to clarity these points Callahan noted that the City can determine not to build the sew er if the costs become too high Radio stated that the property owner has no right to the sewer But if he w ants his property to become connected, he would have to pay full cost, and it would not be forced on him The decision to connect and pay the required cost would lie with the property owner Kelley questioned whether it was a good policy to sewer two areas separated by another development which is not planned for sewer Moorse reported that the development in question has septic and alternate sites He noted, ideally, sewer would serve the development but it would not be forced on them. Kelley relayed a hypothetical question of septic failure to such properties Cook said if the properties failed, there would be plans in place to connect them into the system These properties would be assessed for lateral and trunk charges Callahan indicated there w ere a limited number of sewer units available, and the City is bound by the MUSA application It was noted that this area, as well as the Maresh property, are not located within the MUSA boundary' and would be considered as part of the extra 50 sewer units available. The applications would be considered on an individual basis Cook added that it was their plan to provide for such possibilities noting the area could be accommodated quite easily He noted changes could be made to lift stations at a reasonable cost. Kelley asked if sewer did go to this area on West Farm Road, would it become necessary to take the road as a public road. Both Cook and Moorse indicated that it would not be necessary to do so and easements may be taken for the sewer. Jabbour informed the Council members that they need to look at the policies established rather than going through the whole process for each application. Jabbour said the C ouncil should take the position that sewer will not be provided unless the public health and welfare were in jeopardy and not for purposes of property division and individual benefit. MINUTtS OF THE REGULAR ORONO (TTY COl'M IL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12. 1996 (#9 - Engineer ’s Report Feasibility Study ♦ Continued) Kelley asked what forces are in play in choosing one sewer layout alternative over another Cook said the determination depends on cost Callahan indicated that public meetings have been held and the public hearings should now begin Jabbour asked GalTron how the proposed cost compares to what was indicated when the meetings were held with the neighbors Gaft'ron said the cost has risen 20® o but noted that the residents were informed that the costs would be hiuher Jabbour asked about the Bay Ridge and Bracketts Point neighborhoods and whether there would be any savings if they w ere done together GatVron said these neighborhoods were still being review ed Cook said there w ould be savings involved if the sewering was done at the same time The Council agreed that the neighborhood meetings should be held separately. Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution /#3803 accepting the feasibility report for the North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club sanitary sewer improvements and schedule the public hearing regarding the improvements for the Council meeting of January 13, 1997 at 7 00 p ni \'ote: Ayes 4. Nays 0. CITY AD.MINIS IRA lOR’S REPORT (#10) TELECOMMl NICATIONS REGULATION Moorse relayed information regarding telecommunication towers and antennas being placed w'ithin the City Information was given on how it may or may not affect the City's landscape He asked for direction on how telecommunications towers and antennas should be regulated within the City The ('ouncil agreed that the number should be limited to as few as possible, if any If so. however, the Council preferred that if antennas needed to be accommodated, the placement should be limited to the current water towers It was indicated that the presence of such tow ers and antennas in surrounding communities may enable the service to be provided within Orono without actually requiring the towers and antennas to be located within the City Mayor Callahan asked that the City receive citizen ’s input prior to making any final determinations (#11) DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN Callahan moved. (Joetten seconded, to authorize the City to offer the Premier Dental Plan to City Staff with coverage to begin January I, 1997. r IVlINliTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,1996 (<?! 1 - Dental Insurance Plan - Continued) Kelley questioned the possibility of the City being self-insured. Jabbour noted that better costs are gained through being insured Moorse indicated that the League of Cities has a dental plan similar to a self-insured policy but it costs about three times as much Kelley said he was concerned with rising premium costs. Moorse said he had investigated the cost of premiums over the previous five years which showed only one increase during that time period Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#12) LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT - CORRECTED RESOLUTION #3804 Moorse stated that the previous resolution was not in the correct form. He informed Callahan that this resolution may aid the City in their applications for future grants Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3804 renewing the City's participation in the Livable Communities Act for 1997. Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Moorse reported on the judge ’s ruling regarding the M P R S case The case resulted in costs of $108,000, $303,000 for attorney fees, and $173,000 for punitive damages for a total of $586,000 According to a derived formula, Orono's share of these expenses is about $9,000 City Attorney Radio had no comments (*#I3) LICENSES Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the following license w ith a vote of Ayes 4, Nays 0; Home Occupation License Annual Review Ross R Repke 3380 Watertown Road Goetten later asked the question whether it was legal to sell firearms from a person's residence Mabusth reported that it was adding that this individual purchases firearms wholesale for his own collection. (*#14) BILLS Jabbour moved. Goetten seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD ON NOV EMBER 12, 1996 ADJOURNMENT Ma>or Callahan adjourned the meeting at 8 38 p.m. Edward J Callahan, Jr, Mayor ATTEST Dorothy’ M. Hallin, City Clerk I a 1.0 “ s 3 3CL ZSP IST, 5- 3 (D W O 0) N i > ri ? I I"! 5. 2 > g. ___O S 15 ^ 3* Q. w o ra O rp P 3 i/» =• n S’1 ^ ^ §■ R- § 0^5. • o 2o a E .2 ' *T3 3 1 2 ^ 3 i-e £ •S'”*® 1 SR b ft JO 9 O r» "® JO 2. O 5 o- •a ° " •vn c o “ S. rto *a Resolutioni'§ o 3 *< i&i ________________________________________gg5- 9 CJin> 9 <oS 2. s ^o o 3 ^ S! < 5®</» p r» I c/» REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NO]/^5 DATE: Noej^er 20, ITEM NO ' 'V Department Approval: Name Jeanne A Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2188 Mar/ K. Rice, 1570 North Arm Drive - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB _________________Lot area = 6,883 s f________________________________________ Application: Applicant proposes two options for improvement involving the installation of a single stall garage Option 1 involves an addition to the residence providing single stall garage with upper level deck. Option 2 involves a detached garage located within the south side yard. Both options involve street setback variances. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review; 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Allowed = 1,500 s.f (minimum allowed for all properties) Proposed Option 1 = 964 s f (684 s f house, 280 s.f garage/deck) Proposed Option 2 = 1,264 s f (160 s f deck, 684 s.f house, 420 s.f detached garage) No variances required. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within 250-500' setback area. Lot area = 6,883 s.f Allowed = 2,065 s f Existing = 1,648 s.f or 23.9% Proposed Option 1 = 1,768 s f or 25.6% (add 280 s.f, remove 160 s.f) Proposed Option 2 = 2,068 s f or 30% (add 420 s.f) No variances required. 3. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Street setback variance. Required = 35' Existing = 34.5' Proposed Option 1 = 33' Variance = 2' or 5.7% Proposed Option 2 = 32' Variance = 3' or 8.5% List of Exhibits A - Application B C D E F G Plat Map Property Owners List Existing Survey Hardcover Facts Option 1 Option 2 « • Request for Council Action continued Page 2 November 20, 1996 Zoning File #2188 Mark K Rice, 1570 North Arm Drive Description of Request Applicant has presented two options for improvement seeking approval of a street setback variance for a single stall garage Option 1 provides applicant with a deck above the proposed 14' X 20’ addition There already exists along the south side of residence a 10' x 16’ deck Option 2 would result in the loss of a grove of young trees along the south side lot line and require more cutting and filling because of the sloping topography to the south Both options require street setback variances In reviewing both development plans, staff finds no need for granting hardcover or structural coverage variances. The property is located on a hazardous curve of County road. Applicant's property has adequate space within the existing driveway to provide a turnaround Option 2's hardcover is right at 30%. The existing drive would have to be altered and realigned to provide access to the detached garage and maintain driveway hardcover at the same percentage. Applicant confirmed that she preferred Option 1. Staff would also recommend Option 1 finding this option would result in the least impact on the property. Statement of Hardship 1. 2. The property does not have a garage The traveled portion of the County road is located 20’ from the west/street lot line of the property. 3. 4. 5. The 6,88.^ s f lot is subject to one acre zoning standards. The property requires no structure coverage or hardcover variances The City has received no comments froi i!.e property owners notified of the proposed improvement. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of a street setback variance of 2' for Option 1 construction plan involving a 14’ x 20’ single stall garage addition with upper level deck for Mary K. Rice for the property located at 1570 North Arm Drive. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A V ARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2188 WHEREAS, Mary K. Rice (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1570 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and W'HEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to iMunicipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a 14' x 20' single stall garage addition with upper level deck to be located 33' from the street lot line where a 35' setback is required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2188 The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 25, 1996 and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: The property does not have a garage. B The traveled portion of the County road is located 20' from the west street lot line of the property. Page 1 of 4 C. The 6,883 s.f lot is subject to one acre zoning standards D The proposed improvements require no structural coverage or hardcover variances as follows; - Structural coverage is proposed at 964 s f (allowed = 1,500 s.f.). Hardcover within 250-500 ’ se;back area is proposed at 1,768 s.f or 25.6% (allowed = 30%) E The City has received no comments from the property owners notified of the proposed improvement. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district, that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a'^ fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, would not merely serv'e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty, is necessary to preserve a substantial propeny right of the applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a street setback variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) of 2' or 5.7% to permit construction of a 14 x 20’ single stall garage addition with upper level deck, subject to the following conditions; 1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance whll expire on that date (November 25, 1997). Page 2 of 4 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of November, 1996. ATTEST; -ST'.'* Dorothy M Hat>«, Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of November, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for iaid County, personally appeared Icnown to me to be the personts) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ■M Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A r- / I LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the North 80 feet of Lot 13, Hickory Hill, which lies east of the west line of Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian; and The North 80 feet of all that part of Lot 13 in Hickory Hill lying between the Easterly line of Government Lot 5, Section 7, Township 117, Range 23. said Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the center line of the County Road as now opened and traveled near the East line of said Section 7, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Hennepin County. 1Application # Jl / P 4- a Date Received /c - */ •^ -/I Amount Paid ‘ ^ ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S220.00 fS50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI20.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S220.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) k 1 jn # % '1 a If \ ? A < (\ ' ' PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ SiteAddress ]5 70 OV''_____^----------------------- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) rj/f- 1 >~ J 3 ^---------------- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired^ ________________________________(month/\ear) I (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of propern^: presidential ___other (specify). Zoning District:_____________________________________ APPLICANT . Name f\ Ix'C Address: \‘S~7l' H. /7 ivk T^t~. Phone (home ) _____ Phone (work ) 4 j / ^ ~ V ~8~ Citv: r r^O_______Zip:S~--S'^ OWT^ER (if different than applicant) Name ____________________ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip:, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ! (_^f Estimated Construction Cost /? '. rwU/f;?J J (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width /^^Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship Cf practical difficulty or unusu.al property conditions jjreventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: l/y'frc/, -------- (1 o ~v \ • --------------------- / ft y (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All 9f the foUowino information must be submitted bv the annlicarinn deaHIjTi^ i» ardcr for your application to he cnn<iHi»red completp; 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Propert>- Owners List of owners with, must obtain this list, labels and map from 1 . Finance, A-603, Con Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed calculations as required. In addition, provid reproduction. ^ UlTJ __ Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elev grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (f __ List of the legal names (include marital status) the property. This would include name(s) of ap __ As an addendum to this application, please at , persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. City of Orono P.O. Bok 10/24/96 16:10:06 UM) USE flPdlCflTION 1 I 220.00 wwr RICE 12168 1 »0.00 SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL SALE RECEI^ CHANGE OEIKI03 TRANSt 2716 220.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 220.00 220.00 0.00 The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance applicatiorx is npt complete if the abo ve information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) an^or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature XI-CL Date _7 J? ~ ^7/ OWIVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature /- ___________ Date7 ------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make anangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Application # X / P ^ ,Date Received /c - -k*/- f' Amount Paid XS ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARLANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $220.00 TS50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) kTION - 'J X ( //• PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 15 70 Pir>^ Dr^ Propert>' Identification Number (P.I.D.) j 'Ool Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Proper^- Acquired ______________________________________ I (do) (<^^t) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential ___pother (specify)___________ Zoning District:________________________________________________ (month/year) APPLICANT . Name f\ Ivic^ Address: IS M. OWTVER (if different than applicant) Name _________ Phone (home) 4 /g>^ ~ V 7 / 1 i 3 _____Phone (work ) L>t ^ ~ 39 73*7" City: Armn_______Zip:*^~5'.^^</ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:Zip: \ /.. // DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost ^ ^ It-/ ( f- Describe request in detail: /' A ■ rJ J (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width /■'^Hardcover Setback:Front Lot Coverage Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions jireventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: </>i^x// ____ .7 o \ - wc \ ^ oV-. r ---------------------------- 7^V (attach additional sheets if necessary) RUN DATE 10/18/96 BATCH 503 I \\HEt8.’£PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NLr. P143S401 PAGE SPROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 07-117-25 <*A 000504005 NORTH SHORE OR J M A R A SOOERBEPG JEROEC H/ROSE ANN SOOERBERG 4005 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55569 38 07-117-23 44 000404009 NORTH SHORE DR M L FLECK AST FLECK MICHAEL L FLECK SUSAN T FLECK 4009 NORTH SHORE DR HOUR) MN 55564 38 07-117-23 44 006604000 NORTH SHORE DR R J BREZA AKA JOHNSON R J BREZA AKA JOHNSON 4000 NORTH SHORE OR ORONO MN 55391PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 08-117-25 33 006601545 MINNIE AVE DIANE LEE OUJLAP DIANE LEE DUNLAP 1545 MINNIE AVE MOUNO MN 55564 38 08-117-25 53 0069 03980 NORTH SHORE OR DAVID M SCHLEICH DAVID M SCHLEICH 3960 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND MN 55364 58 08-117-23 35 0074 01550 NORTH ARM DR MARGARET PELTOLA MARGARET PELTOLA 1550 NORTH ARM OR MOUND m 55364 38 08-117-23 33 006703950 NORTH SNORE OR AMY L A HEINER AMY L A »CI)CR 3950 NORTH SHORE DR MOUffl MN 55364 38 08-117-25 53 0071 01570 NORTH ARM OR MARY K RICE MARY K RICE 1570 rnRTH ARM OR MOUNO MN 55364 38 08-117-23 35 0075 01540 NORTH ARM DR EPOIE A LINOGREN EDDIE A LINOGREN 1540 NORTH ARM OR MOUNO MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 006803970 NORTH SWRE OR TIMOTHY L ZWART TIMOTHY L ZWART 3970 NORTH SHORE OR MOUNO MN 55364 38 08-117-25 53 0075 01560 NORTH ARM OR PATRICIA M LAWLESS PATRICIA LAWLESS 1560 NORTH ARM DR MOUNO m 55364 TOTAL BATCH 505 OOOIl I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE « w E Sr* V>4 0 if 1^ j Oo Ul I D) ■n "D m 5 J3m D O DO O X 2 2 CDm ^ K O O i§* S o mill CO O 9 CD CD CD 9 (0 CD CO (0 (D ^ ^ 13 (D O 5* CDm •D “DII (/) (Da DO 3^If 2. « " 35- «> i ». V ■^1 36 7 • »t } % \ V Vr* t •1 1 . * r 1 7 j___— • * i0^,tsf^ • •’?’•r ^ i<k^e cf ^Attff/^ous OsJ ^ !3 »*:; l:! ^ —4m ;.' ‘O O^. I *r . ., •; #7 1 :• »0 ; lit O Q) O o -a i-f o (D 3" O D »|£ Ct> (Q CQ ^ H Q) 3 CX CV) 3" CD O 0) < 3 ^ H^ o CO 52 ^?» 5 3T «-5- cx =3 5 (Q cr ^ CD O r-t 3^ 3- re c» 3 O ^ O E* DO ~ “ W tJ 3 Q)(O re m O > -' T3 -2 -H ii CD —I ^H !-♦CD CX 5” "nJ CD (X) CD (O 3 “ CD 3 CD O):=• CD ^ O ^ Q) »-4 3 O IT CX 3 CO n s m ^ 8! CO Q) «"♦ o 5 30 4 Q) CD 3 (Q =r CO 3 CO ^ o ^ m " CD Oto CD CD 3. = O < ^ =: 3T 3 CD CD O "O CD CD CD M 52 O CJ o ^ < 2 CD ^=r 3T 21 ^CD ^ 00 ^ ^ O^ CD amc/)n 3J CD CO Oz C3 C» CSi o ^r-4 O CD 3" CD CT^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 500-1000 A. House ^ ZO LENGTH WIDTH X X = X = X • B. Garage X c. Driveway X '>icvv/cl c/k'Tw't^ =7/7 ♦ X = 0. Sidewalk 7 f X ^ =ao 5'/.,pL'r jf f -- w'/. E. ^ATIO/ pi./t. vik a =, 3eck S.F. S.F.•u.•to1V i . S.F. S.F. * . S.F. S.F. liO S.F. S.F. S,F, 5, p^l a. I J F.Landscape X X =: . /U- U AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X PLASTIC SHEETING X iWtur S'lu, ftt'c X = ZT.7- • G. Other c^'-c.sktJi X 9 a4-5 S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone h,es'}. S.F.B ^ [T) fe/X 100 " % A/p. 33 -s - a>^4ciUr am<n/4 ^ H O O ♦ S b ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ (/) (D <P CD (D (D Q (0 CO (0 U) ^ S ^ s a 5‘I 111! ^ Q. CL O S)5sr|f < 11 no -D °-8 CO (Da 73 I ^ • • •«i 2. w ® S- ?? o s -r-» ------<9---------- *>l V>J o o n c‘i *"w >-. .. . rn •-.o • • •'T-B .r*-"**^ . ‘'•n O CD -** O r-> Orr o ^ a ? 5-(S ^ (o o CD ZJ CD a-o CDH X5 ^ CD D 13 3 CD CD Q. CO O 0} 3 ? Q. CDs a «5 CD CD ^ o -. CD 2 S5? CD D CO Zo H IT _ C® H'O or < CD ^ ^ D < Ct ^ m ?. S 00 ^30 r-frr -» CD CD CD E ~ ■"^3-3^ ' 0> 30 5 - “ w p D 0) CO CD CD CD CO N3 *-♦ C a 3 o -4* r-f m O >r- o ^ aCO 5 — • CD ^ O ^ Qj r-4 — D o ^ n Q. 3 CD JSL^Lrno m ' CD CO ^ r->33 (D CD =3 •< CQ — CD 5* CD OCO -H o CD mCO CD Zo zr Om (/) O 73 oz IT CD T3 CD O ^ IT ^Q =r. 00 DO -n CD C3 css> jSLocd q ^ • o CD 0 Vai Ut I OJ •n 1* ■D JJm 5 jjmo T1 O 3J 0 1 2: CDm Ic ^ X ii S O llllll -u U IfIo (/) (Da .f? If O s {}) O Q) O n -Q ‘ O CD 2,^ *> 0 VM IT O D “ CD o o , -! L J •o • • • < ( ♦.:;!0 I • • ••• ^ (Q Q) r-- S (^ o Q. D 3 (Bcno 'i I—r ^ 0) IT ^ -'(DO) a-o ^ 2i S’ Q. 0) 3 Ci. Ho 5 3 Ui ZT MM. • •D 5-^(g ® §■0 ;5zr Im O $ 3^ CD 00 3 O DO O) 3 (O CD (D (/> <D 0) C/) 2 ;; H f-f* 3- CD Vj ^ CD CD CD ro Ca) o CDcn 3 “ CD CD O 3 CD 03 O 5 ? m Q) O C/) -4. CD 03 CD C/> r-> 'A ^ O mmmm 03 3 O 3* Q. 3 < .4 =n 3* CD -4» r4 #-4 ^ 3 ® : z CD ^ cn 3r-f oim (/) O DO oz ^ m - ^ 2 (/) 03 03 3 _ ci ^ 3m 3 C^CD 03 O T3 -H 03 Q ^ o o < -4% CD _ S = 00 ^ ^ o T) 0) C3 S5CJ csa> IT4 O CD 3 CD nn C/) CTD Hov 2 e REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 0»V, is$e DATE: November 21, 1996 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Administrator Reviesied: Name Jeanne A Mabusth Title Building & Zoning AdminisU-ati^r Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2192 Robert and Wendy Beutler, 1331 Resolution North Arm Drive - V’ariances - Zoning District:LR-IB Lot area = 49,200 s f or 1 13 acres Application: Applicants seek approval of a lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on a lot that does not meet the required 140' lot width at the shoreline and at the 75’ setback line. Applicants also seek approval of the use of the existing residence as an accessory structure containing additional living space. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review; 1.Section 10.24, Subd 5(B) - Lot width variance Required = 140’ At shoreline 74.89' At 75' setback 83' Variance = 65.1' or 46 5%. Section 10.22, Subd 2 - Review of hardcover. A. 0-75’ setback area = 5,775 s f Allowed = 0 Existing = 267 s.f or 4 62% (192 s.f steps, 75 s.f retaining wall) B. 75-250' setback area = 15,925 s.f Allowed = 3,981.25 s.f or 25% Existing = 178 s.f or 1.12% Proposed = 1,904 s.f or 11.95% C. 250-500' setback area = 27,500 s.f Allowed = 8,250 s.f or 30% Existing = 5,964 s f or 21.69% Proposed = 5,964 s f or 21.69% No hardcover variances required; new structure will also conform to average lakeshore setback requirements. Section 10.03, Subd. 9(C-2) A. Allowed maximum footprint for an individual accessory structure on property at 1.1 acres. Allowed = 1,000 s.f Existing garage = 901 s.f Proposed accessory structure with additional living space = 981 s.f Request for Council Action continued Page 2 November 21, 1996 Zoning File #2192 Robert and Wendy Beutler, 1331 North Arm Driv'e B. Maximum allowed area of all accessory structures on property Allowed = 2,000 s f Proposed = 1,960 s f. (78 s.f shed, accessory structure 981 s f, garage 901 s f) No variance required 4. Section 10 24, Subd 3 - Conditional uses for second residential unit/guest house (10 20, Subd 3[G-1]) Required area for two residential units = 2 acres Existing 1.1 acres (Property does not qualify for a second residential unit/guest house). Please note applicant is not applying for a conditional use permit for guest house use. Lbt of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants ’ \ddendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Survey F - Existing Hardcover Facts G - Proposed Hardcover 75-250' Setback Area H - Second Floor Plan I - First Floor Plan J - Basement Floor Plan K - Elevations L - Applicants Request to Maintain Existing Residence Structure as Accessory Structure with Additi"‘n>'' Living Space M - Existing Floor Plan N - Proposed Floor Plan O - Restrictive Covenant Description of Request Applicants propose construction of a new residence structure on a property that does not meet the required lot width of the LR-13 zoning district. The new structure will require no setback variances and will be located behind the average lakeshore setback line. The propo^d construction will require no other variances The existing accessory structures on the property meet the required setbacks. At the time the garage strvxture was constructed on the property, the setback from the side lot line was 10' The current code would require a 15' setback for a structure in excess of 750 s.f but less than 1,000 s.f The existing residence structure to be converted to an accessory structure at 981 s.f will be located 15+' from side lot lines and 35' from street. Request for C ouikU Action continued Page 3 November 21, 19% Zoning File #2192 Robert and Wendy Beutler, 1331 North Arm Drive Applicants seek approval of the use of the existing structure as an accessory structure containing additional living space It is the intention of the applicants to retain the heating and use of a bathroom on the first floor, refer to Exhibits M and N The fixtures in the kitchen will be removed The majority of the structure will be used for storage The former living room and dining room area will be office and work shop area It is not the intention of the applicants to use the residence for sleeping rooms for guests as structure will not function as a guest house/apartment It is also not the intention of applicants to use office for home occupation as both are employed outside of home The Beutlers have reviewed the restrictive covenant required by the City for all accessory structures containing expanded living space (Exhibit O) The covenant v>as drafted by the City Attorney for an earlier request The property is served by an on-site well and shall provide the water supply for both structures. It shall be applicants contractor ’s responsibility to provide an "as-built" of the sewer line serving both existing structure and proposed new structure. An additional S.A.C. unit will not be charged as the structure will not be an independent residential unit. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission raised the issue of enforcing the restrictive covenant as to how staff would be aware of someone making use of the structure as a guest apartment The concern was not for the current owner but for future owners of the property The City would be dependent upon adjacent property own«''-s informing of the illegal use of structure Staft* advised that the covenant filed on th*. chain of title provides the City with the means to enforce compliance. The City has failed to uphold certain conditions of approval in the courts when these conditions are listed in an Orono resolution The court will uphold a restrictive covenant. Planning Commission members noted this is the era of conservation and recycling and felt it a waste to require the removal of this structure They were concerned that plumbing facilities would still be retained in kitchen area along with a shower and tub in the bathroom. Members felt more comfortable with the plumbing being removed from the kitchen area along with the fixtures and the shower and tub area from the bathroom facility. Only a sink and stool were to remain within the bathroom. The heating system would remain to allow for use of structure during winter months and noted that thermostat would be at a level to ensure the protection of the plumbing remaining in the bathroom Applicants also noted that the office/workshop area would never serve as a prime office for their occupations as both have full-time employment out of the residence. Request for Council Action continued Page 4 November 21, 1996 Zoning File #2192 Roben and Wendv Beuiler 1331 North Arm Drive Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit B, hardships are reviewed as follows; 1 The property is served with sewer 2. There is no additional land available to expand the lot width of property 3 . No other variances are required as a result of this improvement 4.The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent property owners notified of the proposed improvement Planning Commission Recommendation Three of the four members of the Planning Commission approved the lot width variance for the Robert Beutlers allowing construction of a new principal structure on property located at 1331 North Arm Drive based on the hardships set forth above The Planning Commission also approved of the use of the existing principal structure as a future accessory structure with expanded living space They asked that the plumbing fixtures and plumbing within the kitchen be removed along with the shower and tub frxtures within the bathroom They asked that only a sink and stool remain in the bathroom. Approval of the application was based on the following conditions: 1. 2. Applicants' contractor to provide as-builts of sewer line serving new residence and proposed accessor>’ structure with living space The existing well on property shall serve both the new residence and (he converted accessory structure. Applicants to execute restrictive covenant limiting use of accessory structure with expanded living area. Structure can never be converted to an mdependent residential unit for either rental/guest house or guest apartment use. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission’s recommendation. The minority opinion of one had no problem with the issue of the lot width variance but was concerned with the use of the existing residence to be converted to an accessory structure with expanded living space The member noted the lack of clarity in the code concerning accessory structures with expanded living space and noted the difficulty of enforcing the restrictive covenant. There was also the issue of precedent setting and the difficulty of denying a future request. Request for Council Action continued Page 5 November 21, 1996 Zoning File #2192 Robert and Wendy Beuller. 1331 North Arm Drive The issue of the conversion of principal structure to accessory structure or a new accessory structure containing expanded living space is not addressed under a specific land use application In the case of the Beutler application, you are only asked to review the issue under the lot width variance We reviewed a similar request at last month’s meeting where applicant wanted to retain former residence for accessory use but a variance was required as structure was placed in front of the front line of future residence structure Staff continues to discourage plumbing and heating facilities within detached structures If the City continues to receive more of these requests, staff would ask that Council provide direction as to acceptable levels of improvement within these detached structures and if a land use review should be required. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution granting a lot width variance and to further advise staff to draft a memo establishing guidelines/actions for owners seeking to convert or construct expanded living areas within detached structures. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARLANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2192 WHEREAS, Robert E Beutier and Wendy K Beutler (hereinafter "the applicants") aie the owners of the property located at 1331 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"), and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10 24, Subdivision (B) to permit the construction of a new residence on a property that does not meet the required lot width of 140' measured at the shoreline at 74.89’ and 83' at the 75' setback Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLATD by the City Council of Orono, 1 2 FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2192. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 18, \ggf- ^nd recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings or hardships: A. The lot contains 49.200 s f or 1.13 acres where one acre is required by the zoning district, B, The property is served with sewer. Page 1 of 5 D E There is no additional land available to expand the lot width of the property No other variances are required as a result of this improvement. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent property owners notified of the variance application 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district, that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serv'e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary' to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty, is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a propertv that does not meet the required lot width and grants a variance of 65.1' or 46.5% to Robert E. and Wendy K. Beutler of 1331 North Arm Drive, subject to the following conditions; 1.Applicant shall execute a resfictiv^ covenant limiting use of accessory structure with expanded living area on property. The covenant shall ensure that structure can never be converted to an independent residential unit for either rental/guest house or guest apartment use as property does not meet the required area or width standards of the LR-IB zoning district to allow a second residential unit. Page 2 of 5 2. Prior to the City issuing a Cenificate of Occupancy for the new principal structure, applicants' contractor shall be responsible for providing an as-built of sewer lines serving new residence and accessory structure with living space. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one >'ear of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 25, 1997). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of November, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 1996 by Edward J Callahan, Jr and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of_^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A Lot 4, and that part of Lot 5 lying northeasterly of a straight line running from the midpoint of the northwesterly line of said Lot 5 to the midpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5, Block 6; vacated Oak Place; also Lots 5 and 6, Block 7 all in Saga Hill revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota. i Page 5 of 5 Application ft ; v X Date Received C,c V ? < Amount Paid > ^ ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S220.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI20.00 (no change from original app'ication) Variance for non-conforming structures $220 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) A w ^ rj O V- » PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address \l>’b\ ^-icaTr*. ^ 0.1.’O g- Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) til QQSl Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acguired ^ v) sj g. \ 3> ____________________.(month/year) I (do) (Ho nol) also oun the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property^ V. residential ___other (specify). Zoning District: ~ 1^______________________ APPLICANT Name Bc -oTuc -r . Phone (home ) m 2. - ~l ^ > ^ Phone (vNork ) H 1 - on Address: Ksog.r>- Pmoit Citv:Zip: OM'NER (If different than applicant) Name R<j«3>aK-T B>or.^_c:.r.-________________ Address: 11:^1 Oct.TH A.c.t-a Qf2.>>jg- Citv: Phone (home) Phone (work)_ M1^' o m o-Ttje., Zip: 6 55 oo DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constmction Cost $ Describe request in detail: TS>o*>—o ^ to g.'-o \-foo5:CS.__________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore rr r-ther (specify) o\'^ n.x.iST»>0^r i-\c.o'>C Apn Lvv|l^3c SPac -C. HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:______________________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. v/ v/ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Fomi Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur\eyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/:" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic sur\ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy Z'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy ZVi" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include nanie(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notifie*'. . this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Plea.se remember that ypyr variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT ’S SIGN.\TIRE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (stall time not covered by original tee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date t . c V C~Applicant’s Signature v .Vrlf OWTSER'S SIGN.ATURE —^ ^ ' "" The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. f Owi'.Ci'.' Sionaturej V Date C<-V > Applicant must hav|-^l"'suB^t^^^nto the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. .Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the B ilding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 Ms Jeanne Maba<fh We are requesting a variiince to build a new home on n>\ property located at 1331 Nortli .-Knn Dn\ e We are requesting tlus V’anancc as We do not have the required laJce shore frontage We meet all cl die oUier requuements (i e : hardcover, set backs) We are also requesting tliat if a vanance is approved at the November 18 Pianning Commission meeting that this request be allowed to be heard at the November 25 City Council Meeting We are requesting Uiis to expedite the building process because of the pending winter seiison Tliank you for your consideration Robert &. Wend\ Buetler be City of Orono 2750 Kelley Par^x^ay Post Office Box 00 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Building & Zoning Department # s' i ^ ...1 * *>•• V • • •X- ^ “ j •i «' :9 '1 RUN DATE 10/2^/96BATCH 510PROP AOOR OKNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY O^WERS LIST38 07-117-25 41 002101310 ELMWOOO AVE GORDON N NELSON ETAL GORDON N NELSON 1310 ELMWOOO MOUND MN 55564 38 07-117-23 41 0031 01305 NORTH ARM OR H P SIMNIONIH A C H P SIMNIONIH A C 1305 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 5S564 L L KENT4EDY KENT4E0Y 38 07-117-23 41 0082 01359 PARK DR PETER H LANPHER ET AL PETER A DIAT4E LANPHER 1359 PARK DR MOUND MN 55564 38 07-117-23 41 0086 01545 NORTH ARM OR H SHEKELS A L SHEKELS TRSTES H 0 SHEKELS 8619 NORTH CARDINAL DR PHOENIX AZ 85028 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 2758 07-117-23 41 002901301 NORTH ARM DRP R A E A RODERTSPAUL R A ELIZABETH A ROBERTS1301 NORTH ARM DRM0UT40 MN 55564 38 07-117-23 41 003001305 ELM^KX)D AVE CHARLES E CARLSON CHARLES E CARLSON 2346 CYPRESS LA MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0032 01317 NORTH ARM DR ANN L CARSON ANN L DERBY 1317 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0081 01331 NORTH ARM DR R E BEUTLER A H DEUTLER ROBERT E A WENDY K DEUTLER 1331 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0083 01300 LOMA LINDA AVE MAN KULEfiKAMP MARK A A NANCY L KULENKAW 1300 LOM.A LINDA AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0084 01350 r40RTH ARM OR A P MEISEL A P A MEISEL RICHARD 0 A CAROL A TOOD 1350 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 A 38 07-117-23 41 0088 01304 ELMWOOD AVE RICHARD J JOHNSON ET AL RICHARD J JOHNSON 1304 ELMWOOO MOUND MN 55364 I } TOTAL BATCH 510 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEJITED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEUTATIOf^ OF irJFORMATICN AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEHF4EPIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOI-ILEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE W ,y lVlt/1'^ Certificate of Survey for:RKO CONSTRUCTIONIlous(-‘ Address: __hohtnlluuse Model ________________________ -r: fv Sy / w,<*> f».. «<•«* « »• Ca«MMf r>n«t^ Om0im fr»n»f *>*• 0»«cn«M _»»JO («1 «M>) Om<M Oi^ irv PM ft* «• t«f mrs 4 & 5 . BLOCK _7_ SAGA HILL REVISED KfMtPM ajunry. immso * •• •^•1, •••Mf »M» •«**•• fM" • ••►••• <-• .» . •*.•.1 M !••••• *<*« imm w«»*» •»# i»<N •* •«• »»••• •* M»>»»•»«• •• itiis-iif'-------»® »**H» •> * r * ,(AMwin#4 ft) * <«>l H ,4«li, I S ¥t<% V’ »* *• I I S «»g ••• .'0* t«U ••««'n* 9»«vo/2i/n)CKAPHIC SCALE « # PiaNHR v 4n »2_r> c V- iS4V_O-^S /«et from ohw Lake 75 - 250 feet from OHW Lake 250 - 500 feet from OhW LakeWood §teps Area Wood Steps Area House Area44819225410032.4 ■28.2 914 15.3 4.4 67 Total Wood Steps 192 Total Wood Steps 100 Total House 1 dSi Boulder Ret. Wall Area Shed Area > Garage i Area 1 75 75 9.2 8.5 78 26.2 34.4 901 0 0 0 75 Total Shed 78 Total Garage •901 Decks & steps 20.3 • 12.4 252 4.4 6 26 3 ^ 9 27 Total Decks & steps'305 Gravel Drive Area 13 121 1573 38 58 2204 Total Hardcover Area 0-75 75 x 77 Percentage Hardcover Total Hardcover Area 75-250 175x91 Percentage Hardcover Total Grave Drive x25C 3777 267 •i78 Total Hardcover Area 250-500 1*10 5964 5775 '16925 27500 4.62%-l.'l2%Percentage Hardcover 21.69% HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET / 'ST- SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’ ([Ts-IsQ 250-500*500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plasticm G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - B X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length M I B. Garage X X X Width 2-S I O S.F.S' >> S.F. \ n c-__S.F. __ S.F. (O. O S.F. \ S.F. S.F. S.F. -'X --v S.F.,; S.F. S.Fi' S.Fl. S.F. S.F.' « S.F. [i SJ;. S.F.^ S.F. S.F. % A B ii1 'f- •• « a dr^r-" ■ 'i ® V =tfc M ••II ^ w -W , ft- j L -1 *^g. d.o oo A.A vs*«V-o «- ' f ft : tr f • * / • $ i .»’ \-f • y ^ •* p ' ;.. 7ly :. tr •• / k r . ‘ •. .- . 5* C 'ii-'.t . V^- ♦ I*. #. I K/ My ~T\ •*- •* 4 N Va.%-. .*v •rTT^evi »5! r * I w#» * •"y •7/7 / /' • ^ Vt • •• * • Aa Vi ■ • •• / : •y • / . —wpr t • r^.: 4 * * •* ' * »'i ■ Q'- liFTiTTHIfTf^r U.jjJl Jl*'.'' h I'!i ■j-m i. - j >-*T ^CAvfc-r-«»»\ ^ V^' tV «• , lipiil:! HUiNttiim TT Th 4 1 fcinr ]ME ♦ f rr :i 1- 1 i -f i jn / f I j- r- -- U k.-4. *« f-u hi V_ lUriiLE jjj.M V^»v,ux C,c»/»r'»«»A -5,.*.*. V,-* .* .. .1b»<Mv 1 V^Mp ^'*l»«xrruw<z. to-*. V«»»'«4 li ,J. 1 •73J tyifil tli t itii [•rtiiit •1 lit I SlSwiiwl luiHim H V{ /itf- Kt '\ n 4! 4 I V) vj- \J ccl ?C- •5- V' . • 'v^') X ^ Cc>\\/*"'f' h> OO i< s/i Y j i^pCC- o > i f!: H-.& II i ... . I I ------------1 I Clojc'f' C/oic-f 4- . ._ — f i r^;y>/9),> ! / I I c[ 6 ’ .iz. i h v>'-'-“‘t N 44 o RESTRICTIVE COVENANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that (collectively, "Owners"), do hereby expressly covenant and agree to not use the ________________________________on the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, as an alternative living space, including but not limited to, a guest house, secondary residential unit, mother-in-law apartment, rental of structure, or the like. This Restrictive Covenant shall run with the land, shall be binding upon Owners, their respective heirs, successors and assigns, and may be terminated only upon written agreement of the City of Orono. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owners have hereunto set their hands this _______199_. day of STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 199_, by Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY AND PLEASE RETURN TO: POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)333-4800 I NOV 2 5 1996 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CfTYOFOHOMD DATE: November 20, 1996 ITEM NO.:u Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Jeanne A Mabusth Title Bujldma & Zoning Administrator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2194 David Alan Sutherland, 1365 Resolution Arbor Street - Variances - Zoning District:RR-IB, 2 acre minimum lot size Lot area = 7.000 s f (property is served with sewer) Application: Applicant seeks approval of side and rear setback variances to permit construction of a partial second stor>' over the existing structure The existing residence structure is located 3* from the existing single stall garage The second story addition will be expanded within the substandard setback. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review; 1 Section 10.03, Subd. 12 - Separation setback from structures Required = 10' Existing = 3' Proposed = 3' Variance = T. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Review of structural coverage. Total area = 7,000 s.f. Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 1,100 s f Proposed ~ 1,100 s.f No variance required. Section 10 22, Subd. 2 • Review of hardcover. 500-1,000 ’ setback area = 7,000 s.f Allowed = 2,450 s.f or 35% Existing = 1,978 s f or 28.26% Proposed = 1,978 s.f or 28.26% No variance required. Section 10.28, Subd. 5(B) - Rear and side setback variances. A Rear setback Required = 50 ’ Existing and proposed ^ 29’ 'Variance = 21’ or 42%. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 November 20, 1995 Zoning File #2194 David Alan Sutherland, 1365 Arbor Street B Side setback Required = 30' Existing and proposed = 18' Variance = 12' or 40% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Hardcover Facts F - Site Plan Gl-2 - First Floor Plan and Partial Second Floor Plan H - South or Side Elevation I - West or Rear Elevation Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of side and rear setback variances for construction of a second level above the rear section of residence located within substandard side and rear yards. Intensification of the structure within the required yard areas require variance approvals. The existing single stall garage and residence structure are divided by a 3' setback. The current code requires a 10' setback As applicant is intensifying portions of the structure within the substandard separation setback, this too requires variance approval. Review Exhibit I, the 2'+ overhang will be higher than garage roof but may still require special fire wall construction. Review Exhibit A, applicant notes the proposed improvement is the first phase of construction of a complete second story- estimated to be completed some time in four years The second story above the remaining portion of the house will require side and street setback variances at the time applicant is ready to proceed with the improvement. Review of Hardships 1. Subject property consists of 7,000 s.f and is subject to 2 acre zoning standards. 2. Proposed improvement will not result in further extensions into the substandard yard areas. 3. Lot to rear of property is vacant. 4. Property is served with sewer. Request for Council Action continued Page 3 November 20, 1995 Zoning File #2194 David Alan Sutherland, 1365 Arbor Street 5. The area and width of the lot is consistent with developed lots to immediate south and southeast of the property. 6. Property is located immediately west of the City’s Old Crystal Bay Road park. 7. The City has received no negative comments from property owners notified of the proposed improvements requiring variances The applicant advised that the two mature evergreens at the south and east side of structure will be removed as a result of new construction. Sutherland advised that he does propose to install new plantings when construction is completed in the spring of 1997. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the setback variances for David Sutherland to permit construction of a partial second story over the existing residence located at 1365 Arbor Street based on hardships set forth by applicant. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 12 AND SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2194 WHEREAS, David .Alan Sutherland (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1365 Arbor Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 2, Markville, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); a.id W'HEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 1003, Subdivision 12 and 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a partial second floor over the existing residence structure located 3' from an existing detached garage where a 10' setback is required, 29 ’ from the street lot line where a 50' setback is required, and 18' from the side lot line where a 30' setback is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2194. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring two acres in area. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 18, 1996 and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A The property consists of 7,000 s.f and is subject to two acre zoning standards for development. Page 1 of 4 B. The proposed improvement will not result in further extensions into the substandard yard areas C. The vacant lot to the immediate rear of property is legally combined with developed homestead parcel to immediate south and will not be developed as a single family residence. D. The property is served with sewer. E. The area and width of this property is consistent with developed lots to the immediate south and southeast of property. F. The property is located immediatei; west of the City's Old Crystal Bay Road park G. The City has received no negative comments from property owners notified of the proposed improvements requiring setback variances. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings and hardships, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 2 and 10.25, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a partial second story over the existing residence and grants a 3' or 30% separation setback variance, a 21' or 42% rear setback Page 2 of 4 I variance and 12' or 40% side setback variance, subject to the folIov<ing conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, bit are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 25, 1997). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of November, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoirg instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of November, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to b»e the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 ___; Application #^i4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S220.00 (S50.00 pt.r each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI20.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S220. After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Date Received in - 1 <; - Amount Paid ^ C> ' o 0 ^cJ'J t 5 / :l ^V. ^^*«*%**. PROPERTY INFORMATION I / ;o Site Address / UrhcT hi. I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / O' / / 7 ' cA3 ^/ OCSy Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur\ey. Date Propert>- Acquired "7-^/3-- 9 (monthly ear) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of propert>': residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:_____________________________________ APPLICANT ^ if (home) 3 " Name sl3 Q n Or Ic\hc[ Phone (work) M 7*7-170/ Address: / 3 f her hcA^yi City: (?, r <^S^hr ( /d/V~l Zip: <7^3^^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ________ Phone (home). Phone (work) Address:Citv:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Describe request in detail: ^ ^ /•-- '^Ci. I" ^A ' V y ^ (attach additional sheets if necifssaiy) 'fc VARI.ANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Flardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:____________________________________— (attach additional sheets if necessary) If REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1 2 5, 6 7, 8 Completed Application Fomi Certified Propert\ Owners List of owners within 150’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govi Center. 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic sur\ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the propern-. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included, APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all infomiation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/'or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the infonnation supplied is true and correct toMhe p^t of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date to OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation qpd, verification of this request. \ Owner's Signature CL\Dote Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days befc. Plaaning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday ox v.cch month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building &. Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 - i. 7 V. ' X •- »4 v^y- rQ \:j ^x~\. » 'Mr-'-^ c ‘M";; T"o (,ri>^-^ -- r j .r« \ \ . \ \jy U ^o '1 - • -s, -•- thy--.. T'.t' - «f-r*-,• ♦/O-111 -23-3?r jt\4cr 01 -4___ * r)ii. o r* 7, ,n ■- 'Jl - -1 - _»*ii 1^0 ■:i Ov 1 1 *7 w •» ■-’VvJ 1 '!:.................<Ji bJ * "• ■1 f-'! ^ --: j) i. • 1 ■ i 1 ._h2.______Hil i1 ■ “ *1 -•X| .- •■ t.M t 1 ir i: Oil I j .V». 3 1 it^ 1 <*• •,f • • 1 a:."1 . -.to* '4 1 ^ r O c • • 1 . 1 r^ * j 39.1 Jj 11 tU *4 r . *“ . V.1 ck‘ .*». li .S4p.«> Stvor 19’» OG ^-1 ^ OG 1 UG 0. 1 <:» 1 N r'v cl .' —- lu N...U ( I-- o •» mm*' ^ 1 .li. 1 Oos• J!LJ-Qi. -4 Hvm y; os T 'oir ros- ----Ii _ _ o *-> ':> o Ok.—, ^“■s tc •4 u ^ :> 4 , , L. I I I .r' 4» O #. . k-*N -4 ..trj - r I *»uo LPLlL^ iJt U, ' Xu f ( I _ I fl I o _k5 oK?; 'jj CS oJ »>j •< 09 ^9) =3 ‘1V-.'?> -. \r->^ 09 I _ |T • :zim 'i I — 1 JJOQdV ^ ' a* !O _ tu ‘l;7' tV 7 .'^-u< L .> ' ■'r - .>'• 4A/ O J. A •;•(jifi u '4 % * 'jy -- ‘:51 V t Vu> a; '■ *1 o f- U ,1 1 Si '■^ ,'-3['os {/; ^ in '.. 1 U11 < rn 1 CD t I* 'L vO J\ i N-• fji ' ^ ■ ,*" ^ * tD xXDo 1 :^J^6 tZ « ui V't. A •J9. 3 tf *1 '■ ^ ''--JW . 7.,/ , ■ W'"'- / / '?''--‘7,'i:,-'i;l- W ,»•/ / / - /r^ • ' / / / RUN DATE 10/16/9^ BATCH 504 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST EfPi^T NO. P1455401 PAGE APROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 10-117-23 31 004801375 BROMN RO S J E FRICKSTAO ADA MOEH J E FRICKSTAO ADA MOEN 1375 BROMN RO S HAYZATA W 55591 38 10-117-25 51 004901380 ARBOR STT H A K S SMITHTODD H A KRISTEN S SMITH1380 ARBOR STNAYZATA tM 55391 38 10-117-23 51 OOi.-01595 8R0HN RO S P r A L KALEY PHILIP KALEY 1595 BROFM RO S HAYZATA m 55391PROP AODR ONNER NA»« TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NATC TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 10-117-23 31 005101335 ARBOR ST BARBARA J GARCIA BARBARA J GARCIA BOX 114 1135 ARBOR ST CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0054 01365 ARBOR ST DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND DAVID ALAN SLH'HERLANO 1365 ARDOR ST HAYZATA m 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0098 02180 NORTH SHORE OR MARTIN A ANDREA SCHNEIDER ATELIER LESUEUR INC 2180 NORTH SHORE OR HAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 005201355 ARBOR ST G C PETERSON t J H PETERSON GREGORY A JULIAhNE PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST NAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0055 01385 ARBOR ST E A LIBATIQUE ET AL H/L EST ENRIGUE LIBATIQUE BOX 139 1385 ARBOR ST CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0101 01335 8ROIP4 RO S CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 005301360 BRIAR ST P Ba«1AN A B BONMAN PAUL A BARBARA BONMAN 3458 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA m 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0056 02140 NORTH SHORE DR DORIS Z EISEriCRAMER DORIS I EISENKRAMER 2140 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 52 0019 02240 NORTH SHORE DR ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA MIMIETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE HAYZATA MN 55391 o 1 c V PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 504 00012 S L RUN DATE 10/16/96BATCH 504 MENNEPI^4 COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI9S5401 PAGE 7 *1 j im • "T-. C'VCJ V . *•' a I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEOTATiaj OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEtWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE f- ^ (/ V . • •• / I V ✓ • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ * .k'’ ^ j *• •< . . U # t • 4 <M » #. K « < H • S 89°20' 30" E 87.50 I— LU Ld Q1 (/) «< • I II -’t (Ho CD < N 89®20' 30" W • • • 87.50 * • •• t* V « .k f * f » • •• » • I •• , • i « LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES :« The East Half of Lot J, Block 2, Markville • ♦ ••o-: denotes iron marker -• •• . - Bearings shown ore based upon ai assumed datum. • « I • < 4 • • • ’•% lii • * •<• • • • • • • f • •• « • <*» «« I M • M • « • •J il *1 ••••••••I k. •mam ■ • • I t « • I V • il • I • 'f \ %• • • ■ «* 9 • This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house end garage, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to, show any . other improvements or, encroachments. . •ifi u » t I * I •• I ' I / • *1 • .» 4> I M I > \ ni_.ININl_r UN I I , iVUININC_OV I 410 -f- f "^5 /J t •s if *" • * ' *. ♦liu^\n The East Half of Lot 3, Block 2, Markville • r 4 • • • I 60 % % ♦ •• ■* •■ •• LU LlI CK « » M (/)« Qio CD < » ' . ••« •« • I Ml tl . * • i I I • • * • «. •.» Ml m f 1*4 ••«!• • < *I •» li l« * f •(•#»««• • to • . I « 4 t V ' »l I I • '»I 1*1 • • • .1 Ml N • «l •••!• «• N < ’t , *• J ll M o : denotes -iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the'above described property, the location of an existing house and garage, and the location of -all-visible - "hardcover'' thereon.-It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. • « • < w • .% ' .K-ii' . • • • I • ♦ •••* * • l« * •!» •. « • ••« • » t % - • I • I t • i M • »l • * • '• • $ • « \ i 1*. t m» m • a 6 ¥m# «• • • • -..-^Tsar r-r rrr. • • ^ • • • • \) cl*i 'vV ^1. p'.' / 1r / r7 ' -C rLi^' Co- t vJ I . -' .O'--- M 1. Vc-’ -1 'o _J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Nov^?f?at5j)t.l3,19%^ ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name John R. Gerhardson Title Public Works Director Administrator Reviewed:rV/:, Agenda Section: Public Works Item Description: Change Order #1 Lift Station 28 Due to delays beyond the contractor’s control, the Lift Station #28 rehabilitation project cannot be completed by November 15,1996. The contractor is requesting a time extension to December 15, 1996. It is recommended to allow the completion of the Lift Station #28 rehabilitation project to December 15,1996. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Change Order #1 - Lift Station #28 project, extending the completion date to December 15,1996. i 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates Engineers & Architects Boneitroo. Rosene Anjc nk jrd Assocuntes inc is An Aftirr^ Action £quAi Oppc'tunity PnncipAfs Otto G Bonestroo PE • Joseph C Arnlernk PB • Marvin L Sorv^ia. PE • Pjchcird € Turner PE • Cienn R Cook PE • rhom.^s E Noyes PE • .Robert G Schun.cht kE • Je"'’) A Bourclori ^E • Robert a Rosene PE Sus«^n M EberMn CPA . Senior Consuftonr^ Associate PrircipAfs Ho.v trO A Sanford PE • Kerth A GorPon P£ • Robert R Pfetferle P£ • Richard W Foster PE • Dovid O LosKoto PE • Robert C Russek AiA ■ Mark A Hanson, PE • Mich,^el T R^utni^nn PE • Ted K Field P£ • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • M<irk R Rolfs. PE • S»dney P Williomson PE L S • Robert F Kots-nith Offices St p.»ul Roche iJer Wnirr.*' And St C’oud V^^4 • MequOr^ Wl S> .•> Si: > /-4 . Novembers, 1996 t. ♦ ♦ City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson 6 - Re: Change Order No. I Lift Station No. 28 Renovation BRA Pile No. 13968 '■'o Dear Mr. Gerhardson- Enclosed herewith is four copies of Change Order No. 1 which extends the completion date. Once this is approved, please distribute as follows: Owner Contractor Bonding company Bonestroo & Associates If you have any questions regarding this, please call me at (612) 604-4881. Sincerely, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANTtERLTK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark D Wallis, P.F. MDW:klg enc. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 ■ 612-636-4600 ry Bonctiac Owner; City of Orono, 2750 Kelly Parkway, Orono, MN 55232 Date October 22. 1996 Contractor Ford Construction Company. Inc., PQ Box 667, Excelsior. MN 55331 Bond Co.: Washington International Insurance Co.. 800 Lasalle Ave.. Suite 2100. Mpis.. MN 55402 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 LIFT STATION NO. 28 RENOVATION File 13%8 Description of Work Item No. 1 - Completion Date Extension This item was needed to give sufficient time to procure the pumps. The completion date will be extended from November 15,1996 to December 15, 1996. No change in the contract amount will occur due to this lime extension. Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order Revised Contract Amount (including this change order) $69,872.00 SO.OO $69,872.00 i Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. date: /o/z 7/f, Approved by Contractor. FORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO cc: Owner Contractor Bonding Company Bonestroo & Assoc. 13968/co wb I f % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %Qc> DATE: November ^H§96 ^ • ITEM NO,\ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assl. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator Item Description: Lafayette Ridge Tax Forfeit Property List of Attachments A - 919196 Letter from Bruce W. Palmer B - 4/23/96 Letters to John Larson and Terry Schuler (Hennepin County Tax Dept.) C - Staff Memo 12/8/94 D - Plat Map/Topog/Overlay E - Copy of Special Assessment Levy • County Road 15 Street Lights (1990) F - Street light location map Bruce W. Palmer, representing the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association (LRHA), requests that the City release tax forfeited Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge to the LRHA, and that the City waive the street light assessments levied in 1990. Outlot C is a wetland and open space commons parcel created by the PRD plat of Lafayette Ridge in 1978. Outlot C was intended to remain in the ownership of a homeowners association as density credit for this subdivision. The parcel went tax forfeit in August 1994 for reasons discussed below, and the LRHA lost its right to redeem as of August 1995. Because of this and based on State Statutes, according to Gary Hoecherl at the Hennepin County Tax Forfeit Department, the City has only a limited number of options to help the Association reclaim the property: 1. 2. 3. Release the property for sale to adjacent landowners only, since it is unbuildable. Activate the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority and have the HRA purchase the property for sale to the LRHA. Apply to the County for a cancellation of the forfeiture based on an incorrect method of special assessment, i.e. assessment of an outlot rather than the bencfitted homestead lots. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 November 22, 1996 Lafayette Ridge The second issue needing to be resolved is LRHA’s reauest for waiving the street light asse'isments. of which no fHirtions have ever been paid. The Council's options ar this point are: 1.Deny the waiver and require payment of past due amounts as a condition of release of the property. Approve a partial waiver of the assessments. 3.Waive the entire assessment. Background After the subdivision was completely developed, starling in 1985 the ta.\ statements for Outlot C were mailed to Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association in care of Randy Rosengren at his North Farm Road address, according to County tax records. This continued long after he was no longer involved with the Lafayette Ridge project. The County tax records still show his address for the LRHA. Apparently neither Rosengren nor the LRHA ever notified the County to whom the tax statements and legal notifications should correctly be sent when Rosengren ’s involvement ended. In 1994 Rosengren indicated to staff he did forward tax statement to the LRHA for a period of time. In 1990 the City levied an assessment for County Road 15 street lighting, and that levy included Outlot C. The LRHA claims they never received notification of this special assessment. The City did mail legal notice to the LRHA at the address specified in County records. Since this property' is a "K" classification, it normally is not taxed because its value is spread over the homestead parcels within the subdivision, hence no taxes were ever due prior to the street light levy. As i result of the assessment, and its nonpayment by the LRHA because they apparently knew nothing about it, the parcel went tax forfeit in 1994. The City learned of this in late 1994, and Council adopted a resolution requesting the County to delay public sale of the property so the City could resolve the questions surrounding re-acquisition of the property by LRHA. In discussions between Jeanne Mabusih and representatives of the LRHA earlier this year, it was the City's expectation that LRHA would pay the outstanding assessments and the City would request that the County convey the property back to LRHA. However, in a September 9, 1996 letter to the City from LRHA President Bruce Palmer, the association requests that the assessment be waived, based on the inappropriate application of a special assessment to that "K" classification outlot. Mr. Palmer is expected to be present at your November 25th meeting. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 4 November 22, 1996 Lafayette Ridge ___________ Should Assessment be Waived? The 1990 street light assessment was levied against commercial and residential properties along County Road 15 at a commercial rate of $11,695 per front foot and a residential rate of $3.90 per front foot. CXitlot C was assessed 647.0’ for a total residential assessment of $2,523.30. Total principal and interest unpaid to-date is $2,823.08, with an appro.ximately $300 principal and interest payment due in each of 1997, 1998 and 1999. This project was levied at an 8% interest rate. I am advised by the County that there are also yearly penalties ranging from $55-73 that have accrued. Mr. Palmer indicates that applying a special assessment to an outlot was incorrect and inappropriate because ”K" classification outlets do not pay ta.xes. The County agrees. It would have been more appropriate for the City to have spread the assessment over the 5 homestead parcels within the Orono portion of Lafayette Ridge. The City is asked to waive the special assessment. In staffs opinion it would only be appropriate to waive the special assessment if Council concludes the property does not benefit from the street lights. The rationale in originally assessing Outlot C, was the fact that street lights were placed in the right-of-way abutting Outlot C. It might be argued that those street lights do not benefit the actual homestead properties because they are significantly distant from the street lights and do not abut County Road 15. Exhibit F is a location map of the street lights. As outlined above. Council may wish to consider three options regarding waiving the assessment: 1.Deny request to waive assessment, require LRHA to pay the unpaid 1990 through 1996 levy amounts which include principal and interest, with the expectation that they pay the 1997-1998-1999 payment in the normal manner (the City could re-spread these over the 5 benefitted lots). 2.Conclude that Outlot C has only a limited benefit from the street lights and waive some portion of the unpaid and/or future payable levy amounts. 3. Conclude that Outlot C has no benefit from the street lights and waive the entire assessment. Staff Recommendation The City should assist LRHA in any way legally possible in regaining ownership of Outlot C Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 4 November 22, 1996 Lafayette Ridge since it was required as density credit for their subdivision. As long as LRHA does not own Outlot C, the individual properties must be considered as non-conforming and the special setbacks, etc. approved with the subdivision would be considered invalid. Since John O'Sullivan is the only adjacent propeny owner other than LRHA or the 5 individual >^,afayette Ridge lot owners, the risk in releasing this for public sale to adjacent owne-s is that O’Sullivan could pick it up and it would then not be serving its originally intended density credit purpose. It appears the cleanest way to accomplish the goal of LRHA re-acquisition is to request a cancellation of the forfeiture due to a City error in the method of assessment. In this process, the City still has the right to conclude how much of the assessment must be paid by LRHA. This may also allow the penalty fees to be dropped, but I am advised there will be some added costs passed on by the County in processing a cancellation. Council should allow LRHA representatives to state their case for a waiver of the assessment based on the degree of benefit shown. However, in staffs opinion the assessment should not be waived based solely on the lack of assessment notification, since that is not the City's fault, nor solely on the fact that an Outlot was assessed rather than the individual lots which benefit by its existence. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1.Determine whether the special assessment for street lighting should be totally waived, partially waived, or not waived. 2.Choose one of the following processes to accomplish the reconveyance: A. Sale to adjacent landowners only. B. Sale to the Orono HRA for resale to the LRHA. C. Make application for cancellation of forfeiture due to City error. Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association P.O. Box 41 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Orono Cit\' Council P.O. Bo.\ 66 Crystal Bay, NfN 55323 Oullot C, Lafayette Ridge (17-117-23 44 0094) The purpose of this letter is to request that the Orono Cit>- Council pass a resolution directuig Hennepin County delinquent Tax Forfeit and Land Department, to release Outlot C to Lafayette Homeowners Association Prior to 1994, the Cit>- of Orono assessed Outlot C for street lighting improvements On August 26, 1994, this propertx was forfeited to Hennepin County for lack of pavinent on the special assessment On August 26, 1995, Lafayette Ridge Homeowners lost its rights to redeem Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association was never notified of the assessment of the forfeiture, or of its rights to redeem in that the notices were sent to the wTong address There are several ouUots associated with Lafayette Ridge in which we have received tax statements for several \ears The tax statements received for these outlets indicate no tax due, in that, the outlets do not pay real estate taxes In discussions w ith the tax assessor, the Office of Delinquent Tax and Forfeited Land Department in Hennepin County and with City personnel, we ha\ e been told that assessing the outlot was done incorrectly, in that, given the outlets do not pay ta.xcs that applying a special assessment was inappropriate. In discussions with Hennepin County . they have indicated to us that it will take a resolution from the City of Orono to reverse the pre\ious actions and to release the property back to Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association I ha\ e also discussed this issue with your City Attorney, and asked him to talk to the individual at the County to get specifically what they need from the City to release the property. We presume the conversation between the County and the City Attorney has occurred and that your attorney can provide you with the specific requirements of the Countv. In summary, we are requesting that the City provide the County the necessary information to release Outlot C, and that the City waive the special asses'ment. As you are aware we must retain ownership of Outlot C in order to be in compliance with the PUD agreement with the City ’ of Orono. We will plan to be present at your City Council m^ September 23, 1996, in order to answer any questions you may have at that time. Meanv. wk. i. • .re are any questions regarding our request, feel free to call me at 893-8821 during the d.iy or 471-0347 in the evenings. Sincerely, Bruce W. Palmer President Lafavette Homeowners Association /) \\d IW\ i>V\'C/:'\ 4* April 23. 1996 :5>•i CITY of OROXO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Keiley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 MaRIng Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 John Larson 3225 Lafayette Ridge Court Wavzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Larson: During the review of recent land use applications involving the Baptist Church property and former Martin Service Station property’ in Navarre, you advised stafl that you were in the process of making payment of the delinquent utility assessment levied against Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge (17-117-2 j 440094). The plat of Lafayette Ridge is located uithin a 1 acre zoning district and was approved as a planned residential development.^The area of the outlots were included as density credit to create the five residential lots within the City of Orono. The homeovsners association must maintain ownership of Outlot C to be in conformance with the 1 acre zoning district and conditions of approval of the plat Qf Lafayette Ridge by both the Cities of Orono and Minnetonka Beach. The City of Orono cannot issue permits for building or land alterations while this condition exists. I have sent a letter to the Delinquent Tax and Forfeit Land Department advising them to release the outlot for sale to your homeowners association. The letter has been copied to you and to Mr. Palmer, the representative of the homeowners within the Lafayette Ridge subdivision located within the City of Minnetonka Beach. Please contact my office if you have any further questions concerning these directives. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch cc: Bruce Palmer, 3135 Lafayette Ridge Road \Vav/nta,MN 55391 Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 / 3-z wr-m%r.CITYofORONO 'MM Municipal Offices /■Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parttway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O Boi 66 Crystal Bay, MM 55323 C066 April 23,1996 Terry Schuhler Delinquent Tax & Forfeited Land Dept. Taxpayers Services Division 300 South 6th Street A-600 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060 Dear Mr. Schuhler: You are asked to release Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge (17-117-23 44 0094) upon payment of a delinquent utility assessments against Outlot C. The homeovvners association of the Lafayette Ridge Planned Residential Development has been advised of the need to retain ownership of the outlot as a condition of approval of the final plat of Lafayette Ridge approved by the Cities of Oron j and Minnetonka Beach in March of 1978. Either John Larson or Bruce Palmer representing the homeowners association will contact your department to make arrangements for payment and release of the property to the private property homeowners association. Please contact my office if you need additional information or if more formal action on the part of the City is required to release the delinquent tax parcel. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch cc:John Larson, 3225 Lafayene Ridge Court Wayzata, MN 55391 Bruce Palmer, 3135 Lafayette Ridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Teiepbooe (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 V • T,v ‘'vvV^'' ' --V''■' , •'- ir.“«. ^: - ^ •/ » •i • '• -K! * - ' . *•* 'll /; • -•' i • . ? * I • * i -, ..* ' . -•f.! -; 'V ^ •* y i - :yV.i .•• • * y ■* . * ;M . ■ i ^ • • »♦ * I i- • ** '*•*• I" , '• ; wrV yj A.-I >» *» ♦ ' ~f ■ »»• * •' ** I • ' . .1 •* ! i • •• • ' I * .V: • V / /.'»v? • • * • . . • f . / • V ; . • V ;• # t% .-.*• V . r-: '•A.. • -/?•*% k.-Qv'i-S'i rOR CO\. NCil. ACi'iON '/.'a C.TV.,. ' UATK: Dcv\'n.S:r S, ITK.MNO: ''>.*. Admlnisiraior Reviewed:r-v;:ar .nci’.; A;jp.»va!: ^*^n*c N«** ** 4v« i ii\* 'j, »V T tf* f Agenda Scctiori: Cilv Adininhtralor's Rtpun V..\ . vVA-.; ra.-col .7 117-23 44 0C.')4 Tr.o ci:y h..v .Vcn -. J of a ta\ t\ rScit pared available for acquisition. The ta\ forfeit pared iN C/uiio; C of ;i.e 'i afayeitc R.J.ee* PHD created about 15 years a;o. '.'.v »s ;,ivr>>'...\!.iic.\ 7 ac.e.'. eor.t.:i.un^a t:.e 6 ac.-es wctlar*! on the north side of County \> viiilot V M> .»> i!.c .iu»>c;;c isivl^c l:o;nco\\ricr> A>MX.uiior4 as an v\vn space ou:!ot ««rv*a Ci*Ci»ii lOf t/ts »4^ t!. rev;e.vin: \.ae;; v; the c..y shouui aciiui-e this parcel, staff notes concerns as to liabuuy lor .ia\ c:c..;;-ap of ,va '<<m uM'K.t.ce .•■.o;m the jas station abutiinj! its west end. Further, it .shv^uld :v/r.u;i;s s; .>• ,a t;u . at.cish.p oi'il.e hoiv.cowners as.wviation for the original purposes imendv.'d. No;e'ii.at the r.t> . ocs l.nvc eon»..vaiion. flowa.ce and dramatte cascients over this pared. •.. ce.'s ...\ 1' -K" c:.is^..^cation. whose t.ises art spie.id over the bcncfittin;: i:..::..‘s:e.;d p-r.eis w;.;.;i. ti.t si.hd.\ .Mon lloweser. the city apparently assessed this panX'I fs'r s:.ve; ..d:;' .a.h.cf sp.e.idittp ih..: asscsMv.cnt over the homestead lots. The assessment '! n\eo i.p on t.i\ s;.i:c. ‘.e:t;s hat was never paid hi.til tus Ic.irncu tliat the tax statements h.ivc .-.•sO .;o-iv: to ...; ii..Mo Ou..dcr wh * ius i.ad no mvo.vcment with the property for 10 tears and wlio i;.tJ been .■.•rw.ndn.p li.e t.is si.ne.ncnt' It i' not known set whether the llomevwvneiN :\ssx\,Mix^n ever received s.iivl u\ M.iicnviu^ is imcMi.eai.iii; this ta\ forfeit parcel liiiihcr. ,vnd theiefore a ress'KUion rvviestmj; an o\:ci ‘s.''r( of ;liC dc.ulims* tor o.i\ action is i.ii.ichcsl V M. \i :i. .At ihs A I<i 0‘ F-bTF l>; \ ■ .li.ivla-.l ic'>'’.i:i‘’n us.iicMin.' e\iensi.>n POOR ORIGINAL DOCUMENT •»/•> . . : • v' r"•• r-'. ;•% • t;. Vr * . V*- “* • • ;'v' I*.* :* 3 - * •• v''- f-#v IV. • • * • \ ^ fc'* • V.t‘ *• f • V- ) % ' rv . . r .• 'V • . * a'Il'' ? •rr-.-.v .V.'.b'.r 'V. tve» r ».v.-.V \* • * : I’si'Vtt- i jVAo ‘ tiA* Lts'’-'- * *•* •J / • * ’. ■ \ s I • fit A--AN.-W* Lv'S*2, 43. r. 56. 5Q. ea. to i ?i •4'.lx :e*s c :it:oi to VlU*3£ Ofi BEA>. »6). rC^AC i -.s m:sc. P 550 5 ----— 5CJ 50 L-^ ill) T V uis: -A ■I. - rrrr^\^ V'3V25)\ji*^'^‘*- -3» \^'3)V ' / . « (20 ''\~^i. > ■’ >'' vs, - \ ♦ -1 ■ a V'c v ^/ 25- 5; ? 27- (79H50) (8 i? A5 v62) 50 '*^ - 3 » 1 » ^ <. • •/ 1-" 25 ^5 ^ V .\-^1 • »r j .. .j ;:4 5 ^3 / , > /,i5:^ ■: -sf t;; x' .'.IV:'*- 4 \ ^J-« i.______> •.VO V: .'5 C" ::c s: ."•:; :9 \\, j: >2 ■<y •;;.-{•£ LmrsTfs :-c-. ei nEE GOVT LOT 6 i <C=Cb d]D z ru I---------1 •CD O t 4 o ▲ '*4Ckf. tss • I4k|ttMAM ••4|a*a UM lift tail cowia f»4»# aiiC Owiu»i Ma4;u£^ t«i| a«ii ioUOlkC iuuoiaft • u*Lia C04|ta. tttvciu«ft kOaCaiH U4| t«i*««iac aoOi accaf4ii3« fkcuiit tICat t 4M4 aokC tvtitr iic^f Wtliltt 1^1 •4uao40 iic**4. i*ua040 Svltcn cao^ COataA • fiat. caowao coaiaoi /•fit laoci COafOwa • |at|tf«ot4Tf cOatOut Of*»CSSlCa CCafOua MSCuafO COatQja laoi fi|i»tlCa too ttaic •• f«al 0 100 C**i*«* J* SEI/4 SEC. ir TI I7N.R23W HENNEPIN COUNTY »0« Orono. Mlnnct^l* m > HORt/ONS. INC. • •• • C-«. M t"M I*!* • DM HORIZONS* riLC 3-Z209 Bifi- Hi rtu timjntv o#«#«a 11ur«—u:.«%« t€t-u Au ;.•<« V I l«t.HUNicy LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEVY PROJECT ADOPTIONOISTR.CODE30ORONOCO RO 15 STREET LIGHTS 11552 00369ri^TE PER UNIT SERVICE FIXEDCHARGE CHARGE .05 ADDITION HAHCLAFAYETTE RIDGEFIRSTYEAR UNITS PROPERTY I.O. SEC TWP RO QQ SUFX BLOCK TOTAL Pr<lNCIPAL ANNUAL PRINCIPAL YEARSPAYABLE10 i^Thteris^HOHTHS^INTEREST INT RATE1ST YRlA .05000YEAR/ASSESSHENT 1990 1995 1991 1990 1992 1997 1991 1990 1990 1999 <• 17-117-23 04 0094 2523.30 252.33 521.53 353.31 434.06 333.13 413.07 312.94 395.60 292.75 ^373.50 272.57 • j CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA !1 A ,0 'J / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: November 22, 19% ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning &. Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Citv Administrator Item Description: Lafayette Ridge Tax Forfeit Property List of Attachments A - 9/9/96 Letter from Bruce W. Palmer B - 4/23/96 Letters to John Larson and Terry Schuler (Hennepin County Tax Dept.) C - Staff Memo 12/8/94 D - Plat Map/Topog/Overlay E - Copy of Special As -^sment Levy - County Road 15 Street Lights (1990) F - Street light location map Bruce W. Palmer, representing the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association (LRHA), requests that the City release tax forfeited Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge to the LRHA, and that the City waive the street light assessments levied in 1990. Ojitlot C is a w'etland and open space commons parcel created by the PRD plat of Lafayette Ridge in 1978. Outlot C was intended to remain in the ownership of a homeowners association as density credit for this subdivision. The parcel went tax forfeit in August 1994 for reasons discussed below, and the LRHA lost its right to redeem as of August 1995. Because of this and based on State Statutes, according to Gary Hoecherl at the Hennepin County Tax Forfeit Department, the City has only a limited number of options to help the Association reclaim the property: 1.Release the property for sale to adjacent landowners only, since it is unbuildable. Activate the City’s Housing and Redevelopment Authority and have the HRA purchase the property for sale to the LRHA. Apply to the County for r. cancellation of the forfeiture based on an incorrect method of special assessment, i.e. assessment of an outlot rather than the bene fitted homestead lots. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 November 22. 1996 Lafayette Ridge The second issue needing to be resolved is LRHA's request for waiving the street light assessments, of which no portions have ever been paid. The Council's options at this point are: 1.Deny the waiver and require payment of past due amounts as a condition of release of the property. Approve a partial waiver of the assessments. 3.Waive the entire assessment. Background After the subdivision was completely developed, starting in 1985 the tax statements for Outlet C were mailed to Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association in care of Randy Rosengren at his North Farm Road address, according to County tax records. This continued long after he was no longer involved with the Lafayette Ridge project. The County tax records still show his address for the LRHA. Apparently neither Rosengren nor the LRHA ever notified the County to whom the tax statements and legal notifications should correctly be sent when Rosengren ’s involvement ended. In 1994 Rosengren indicated to staff he did forward tax statement to the LRHA for a period of time. In 1990 the City levied an assessment for County Road 15 street lighting, and that levy included Outlot C. The LRHA claims tl ey never received notification of this special assessment. The City did mail legal notice to the LRHA at the address specified in County records. Since this property is a "K" classification, it normally is not taxed because its value is spread over the homestead parcels within the subdivision, hence no taxes were ever due prior to the street light levy. As a result of the assessment, and its nonpayment by the LRHA because they apparently knew nothing about it. the parcel went tax forfeit in 1994. The City learned of this in late 1994, and Council adopted a resolution requesting the County to delay public sale of the property so the City could resolve the questions surrounding re-acquisition of the property by LRHA. In discussions between Jeanne Mabusth and representatives of the LRHA earlier this year, it was the City's expectation that LRHA would pay the outstanding assessments and the City would request that the County convey the property back to LRHA. However, in a September 9, 1996 letter to the City from LRHA President Bruce Palmer, the association requests that the assessment be waived, based on the inappropriate application of a special assessment to that "K" classification outlot. Mr. Palmer is expected to be present at your November 25th meeting. { Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 4 Novembei 22, 1996 Lafayette Ridee Should Assessment be Waived? The 1990 street light assessment was levied against commercial and residential properties along County Road 15 at a commercial rate of $11.695 per front foot and a residential rate of $3.90 per front foot. Outlot C was assessed 647.0' for a total residential assessment of S2.523.30. Total principal and interest unpaid to-date is $2,823.08. with an approximately $300 principal and interest payment due in each of 1997, 1998 and 1999. This project was levied at an S% interest rate. I am advised by the County that there are also yearly penalties ranging from $55-73 that have accrued. Mr. Palmer indicates that applying a special assessment to an outlot was incorrect and inappropriate because ”K" classification outlets do not pay taxes. The County agrees. It would have been more appropriate for the City to have spread the assessment over the 5 homestead parcels within the Orono portion of Lafayette Ridge. The City is asked to waive the special assessment. In staffs opinion it would only be appropriate to waive the special assessment if Council concludes the propeny does not benefit from the street lights. The rationale used in originally assessing Outlot C, was the fact that street lights were placed in the right-of-way abutting Outlot C. It might be argued that those street lights do not benefit the actual homestead properties because they are significantly distant from the street lights and do not abut County Road 15. Exhibit F is a location map of the street lights. As outlined above. Council may wish to consider three options regarding waiving the assessment: 1. 2. 3. Deny request to waive assessment, require LRHA to pay the unpaid 1990 through 1996 levy amounts which include principal and interest, with the expectation that they pay the 1997-1998-1999 payment in the normal manner (the City could re-spread these over the 5 benefitted lots). Conclude that Outlot C has only a limited benefit from the street lights and waive some portion of the unpaid and/or future payable levy amounts. Conclude that Outlot C has no benefit from the street lights and waive the entire assessment. Staff Recommendation The City should assist LRHA in any way legally possible in regaining ownership of Outlot C, Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 4 November 22, 1996 Lafayette Ridge since it was required as density credit for their subdivision. As long as LRHA does not own Outlet C, the individual properties must be considered as non-conforming and the special setbacks, etc. approved with the subdivision would be considered invalid. Since John O'Sullivan is tiie only adjacent property owner other than LRHA or the 5 individual Lafayette Ridge lot owners, the risk in releasing this for public sale to adjacent owners is that O’Sullivan could pick it up and it would then not be serving its originally intended density credit purpose. It appears the cleanest way to accomplish the goal of LRHA re-acquisition is to request a cancellation of the forfeiture due to a City error in the meth<xl of assessment. In this process, the City still has the right to conclude how much of the assessment must be paid by LRHA. This may also allow the penalty fees to be dropped, but 1 am advised there will lie some added costs passed on by the County in processing a cancellation. Council should allow LRHA representatives to state their case for a waiver of the assessment based on the degree of benefit shown. However, in staff’s opinion the assessment should not be waived based solely on the lack of assessment notification, since that is not the City's fault, nor solely on the fact that an Outlot was assessed rather than the individual lots which benefit by its existence. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. 2. Determine whether the special assessment for street lighting should be totally waived, partially waived, or not waived. Choose one of the following processes to accomplish the reconveyance: A. Sale to adjacent landowners only. B. Sale to the Orono HRA for resale to the LRHA. C. Make application for cancellation of forfeiture due to City error. Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association P.O. Box 41 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Orono City Council P.O. Bo.x 66 Crystal Bay, NfN 55323 Outlet C, Lafayette Ridge (17-117-23 44 0094) The purpose of this letter is to request that thi* Orono Cit>' Council pass a resolution directing Hennepin County delinquent Tax Forfeit and Land Department, to release Outlet C to Lafayette Homeowners Association Prior to 1994, the City of Orono assessed Outlet C for street lighting unprovements. On August 26, 1994, this property was forfeited to Hennepin County for lack of payment on the special assessment On August 26, 1995, Lafayette Ridge Homeowners lost its rights to redeem Lafayette Ridge Homeowners .Association was never notified of the assessment of the forfeiture, or of its rights to redeem in that the notices were sent to the wrong address There are several outlots associated with Lafayette Ridge in which we have received ta.\ statements for several y ears. The ta.\ statements received for these outlots indicate no tax due, in that, the outlots do not pay real estate taxes In discussions with the tax assessor, the Office of Delinquent Tax and Forfeited Land Department in Hennepin County and with City personnel, we have been told that assessing the outlot was done incorrectly, in that, given the outlots do not pay ta.xes that apply ing a special assessment was inappropriate In discussions with Hennepin County, they have indicated to us that it will take a resolution from the City of Orono to reverse the previous actions and to release the property back to Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association I have also discussed this issue with your City Attorney, and asked him to talk to the indiv idual at the County to get specifically what they need from the City to release the property. We presume the conversation between the County and the City Attorney has occurred and that your attorney can provide you with the specific requirements of the Countv. In summary.', v.c are requesting that the City provide the County the necessary information to release Outlot C, and that the City wawe the special assessment. As you are aware, we must retain ownership of Outlot C in order to be in compliance with the PUD agreement with the City of Orono. We will plan to be present at y our City Council meeting on September 23, 1996, in order to answer any questions you may have at that time Meanwhile, if there are any questions regarding our request, feel free to call me at 893-8821 during the day or 471-C347 in the evenings. Sincerely, Bruce W. Palmer President Lafavette Homeowners Association I \ 6-1 crnr of orono Municipal Offkcs Strett Addrf «s: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 April 23, 1996 John Larson 3225 Lafayette Ridge Court Wavzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Larson: During the review of recent land use applications involving the Baptist Church property and former Martin Ser%'ice Station property- in Navarre, you advised staff that you were in tlie process of making payment of the delinquent utility assessment levied against Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge (1 /-I 17-2 j 44 0094). The plat of Lafavette Ridge is located within a 1 acre zoning district and was approved as a planned residential development. The areL of the outlots w-ere inJuded a.<; density credit to create the five residential lots within the City of Orono. The homeowners obsociation must maintain ownership of Outlot C to be in conformance with the I acre zoning district and conditions ot approval of the plat of Lafayette Ridge by both the Cities of Orono and Minnetonka Beach. The City of Orono cannot issue permits for building or land alterations while this condition exists. I have sent a letter to the Delinquent Tax and Forfeit Land Department advising them to release the outlot for sale to vour homeowne»^ association. The letter has been copied to you and to Mr. Palmer, the representative of the homeowners within the Lafayette Ridge subdivision located within the City of Miimetonka Beach. Please contact my office if you have any further questions concening these directives. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM^ch cc: Bruce Palmer. 3!35 Lafayette Ridge Road \Vav2tata, MN 55391 Telepbooe (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITYof ORONO Municipal OfHccs Street Address: 2750 Kelley Partiway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. Mf» 55323 0066 ti, April 23, 1996 Terrv Schuhler 0 ____ Delinquent Tax & Forfeited Land Dept. Taxpayers Serx ices Division 300 South 6th Street A-600 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060 Dear Mr. Schuhler: You are asked to release Outlot C, Lafayette Ridge (17-117-23 44 0094) upon payment of a delinquent utility assessments against Outlot C. The homeoxxTiers association of the Lafayette Ridge Planned Residential Development has been advised of the need to retain ownership of the outlot as a condition of approval of the final plat of Lafayette Ridge approved by the Cities of Orono and Minnetonka Beach in March of 1978. Either John Larson or Bruce Palmer representing the homeoxvners association will contact your department to make arrangements for payment and release of the property to the private property homeovsners association. Please contact my office if you need additional information or if more formal action on the part of the City is required to release the delinquent tax parcel. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch cc:John Larson, 3225 Lafayene Ridge Court Wayzata, MN 55391 Bruce Palmer, 3135 Lafayette Ridge Road Wayzata. MN 55391 Telcpbooe (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 ‘4 .»V • I» A.4 • .■■.-V *\sS i t ‘••’ i •*■ t ’ \i <'.'‘V’ r. :* * '^* •.•^- 4* / * . * ** '■• \ *!•>; /" !^ — * >’/ *• , xv;v •« •’. c . if . • ; ^ ^ vv!1, \Jt’* .' I t- • • J . i . 1*1 ••; f :••» A ..»♦'• * • Vf $ ‘1 ’ 4. -^. * •* /■' ‘ ' ♦ j v>-' ■ i.: V». ! ‘ /l . -.; jV,- • ;' .%J iT ‘ - :i^4 Vi i•^^N:•', - ' A ':*! ^ .',J ' V ! ♦ : trf •. •*. f" • ‘ .i •V * . • : A*, , V ^ •*•r ^ '‘ > . * ' f ^ • ' • * ‘v vw;! .* •■*■' • * .* *. jf •■ ' I ’-V • • i V ‘ *, #«- V. r- ' f ; S‘‘. > • .*•*■ >'' **^:<*' c f^^-; V i ••iVi •f'-,. k*:QVt:s* for coi NCiJ. \CTios U ^ ^ «1 ^ U.\TK: r>cccn.N;r S. 1994 ITKMNO: i Af5ml :»is* ra;or Rev icv\ cd;r-v‘;:ai* .iiCiit A'.jj’.'ovr.!; N^ci.c .V...!i iv: .-*. viai';.***!-. . //, *»**i\* .\^'^•. »v /*'i'tiii^ .\*iii.*»i«>ir«t f ^ Auendu Section: Ci«> AdminMratw's Rrp<>rt i;e.v D.-sCi*i.)tioii: V..X ;*v:cil Parvc: i7 1 17-23 4t tV.94 The ci:y h.;s i'-cen .vtii'-eJ of;! tax iV-rfcit parcel available I'or acquisition. The tax forfeit pa.-vd IN Ouilot C of :i-.e "I.afaycitc RiJ.uc" PHD ercateJ about 15 years a^o. ■;;;.• ,x.;;e: js ;.p,-!r*v„a!.:;e;\ 7 aerc.*. eontaiaina 'lie 6 acivs wetland on the north side of County \\t s x Utloi V .Is a >’a ;;.*u ;»y i!.c • :4l»\;-cuc *\K!ic IIo;u* aviwi > A>M\;iaiton as an v>j>cn space Oiuioi .‘;..J *•> arcM Civvili i\V Inw S%a*vliVl>o’>n. ti. rev .e.vin; \-ao!!:c.' tlie euy shv'uid ae*,ui'e this parcel, staff notes coneems as to liabiiuy tor .say ele..;' up *'•.’ ,*oi ''Vial ieak.iiic ;Vo;';i the yas sUtion abuttinjt its west end. Funher. it should Iv.'r.^ilr.N V. ty ihr r.ership *''f the luT.ieowners as.siviation for the ori^iina' purposes intendN'd. Ni'ie t;..it ;..j e.i> * oes li.ive eoiis.rvaiion. fio\\.i^ee and draiiuge case..ients over ibis pared. ...> ,\. ee. s i..x s;....s i' "K" elass.ue.nion. whose taxes an. spivad over the benciittiriC .•.ii;;es:e.iv! p.ir;oN ......... thv subd.v .s-.on However, the eiiy apparently as.sessed this p;»red tor s;ree: . diis .a.h.er iii.iii sp.e.u!iav: tii..t assesMv.cm over the homeste.td lots. The assessment •.1 nvc ’ v,v on i.ix sMtei'ienis but w.i> iiever pau> Mt.tll lu' learned tliat the tax statements haxv •a.i eo'!v:...i t>..-no Ou..der w!i > li.is ii.ui n.' invo.vcment with the pro|vrty for 10 years and beer. rdnvc il.e t.ix si.iiei.wnis li is not ktuwvn yet whether the 1 lomcvwvneis A'so^i.ition ever received s.iivl tax si.uenwiUs .s,.,:V ;s nivesiieatini; tins tax forfeit pared furihr:. .viul therefore a resolution rcviestiiii: an ':i <»f the ile.sdhne tor eiiv .letion is aiuehevl I. \* 'l' ;\i • I* ill 0* l' .hllvi)l A • .1!'. ivi.i i :e'.-'.i:i -ii us.iieMau! cxienMon ' lAi- DOCUMENT PCOB OP.: > r'-y;:-., 1 -I’-:. V---.. V . ' ’ t rV- . ^ -A « ' 7 '% u *-■ ’ I Vi; -.vy ' %u* *; »'v h‘ * y > '* *1 f'-’ffT- »v.T > ^ •* I'»V' # * .* . 4 • ** I • . .'-t. * * \r fi . M- w • <4 ifS i?.t/u-V:r. ** *^ *• i. • • • ^ » i • ^ • 1*^ ‘•Sr" • ^ . T. rV %29 % O <C=Cb CTT) CEZD lltlAM B«A|fe«4C il«C lail tMC CO»|t ^UC Owlll»C M«Cl CZD ..... t....i "(ZD CD CZD o t ■ A G A tSS • •bKOlAC •ullOlX • U«Ol* COAltl. tttuctvtft CO«i»lU tk*| t«lf«*iac »OOt ■ccif*iis« fACUitt IICAt I AAR ^Oil 1«MII llt«f wi u I tf i:i • •litOAO tICAAi • «ll*0AO SvMC h C«O ua O CC a IIOi • till. C*Ou»9 COattOL lACIl C&Atfiwt . COafOut DI»*((SlOa CCal&u4 OtK^CO CQatXt l^Ot ClColiCa S««l* •• 0 ^ €«••••• 1* SE\/A SEC. \7 n17N.R23W HENNEPIN COUNTY >o< Orono. H iaa «$oI* H0ffl20NS. INC. AfllAi MA^^iaC M9#CSSIOaAiS • • C *> M RtM HORIZONS* MIC 3-ZZ09 i tnjnfy nuurttttr t^4t uttnAt tutt z**i^hmRATE PER UNIT SERVICECHARGE.05 FIXEDCHARGEMUNIC/ DISTR.LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEVY PROJECT ADDITIONCODE — - ^ WADDITION NAHS38ORONOCO RO 15 STREET LIGHTS 11552 00369 LAFAYETTE RIDGEFIRSTYEAR 90 UNITS PROPERTY I.D. SEC TWP RQ QQ SUFX 17-117-23 009A LOT BLOCK TOTAL PRINCIPAL 2523.30 ANNUAL PRINCIPAL 252.33 PAYABLE10 HOHTHS IHTEREST INT1ST VR 16 RATE.00000YEAR/ASSESSMENT 1990 1995 521.53 353.31 1991 1996 639.06 333.13 1992 1997 613.87 312.96 1993 1998 393.68 292.75 1996 1999 '^Tl.SO 272.57 m CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA <5^DIRECTORY FOR 1997 FEE SCHEDULE^ Co{§jf Charges Page Licenses & Miscellaneous fContJ Page Permits (Cent.)Page4f >^Administration 22 Garbage Haulers License 20 Sprinkler Systems -Accl^mt Reports 25 Home Occupation License 20 Commercial 9Bluing Plan Copies 22 Joint Use Dock License 20 Trapping Permit (Limited)24Microfiche File - PD 25 Kennel License 23 Tree Removal 8Jk^opy Service • Police Dept 25 Solicitation License 22 Underground Tank Removal 9Driver's License Record 25 Temporary Trailer/Building Water Meter Fees 9Reprint Oversized Documents License 20 On Microfilm 22 Services Tape Recording Duplication Maps For Sale 22 Fingerprinting (Police)25 (Police Dept.)25 Water Turn-Off Charge 27 Public Works Supplies & Services Water Turn-On Charge 27 Connection Charges Driveway Culverts 29 Sanitary Sewer 10 Driveway/Curb Cut Permits 29 Signs Municipal Water 15 Street Signs (Public Works |29 Permits Temporary & Permanent 17 Documents After-The-Fact Fees 5 Temp. "No Parking" (P.D.)25 Comprehensive Guide 21 Building Permit Fees 8 Temp. "No Parking" (P.W.)29 Special Assessment Searches 22 Burning Permit Fee 19 Municipal Code/Ordinance 21 Cert, of Occupancy 8 Utility Rate & Miscellaneous 26 Realtors Listing info 22 Demolition Permit Fee 8 Annual Service Charge - Current Street Address Book 22 Docks:Septic 17 Contmercial 8 Recycling Charge 27 False Alarm User Fee 25 Residential 8 Recycling Replacement Bins 27 Fire Protection 19 Golf Course Rates 28 Firearms Discharge Permit 24 Zoning Applications Firearms Permit To Carry 24 After-The-Fact Fees 5 Inspections Fireworks Permit Fee 24 Amendments 3 Contractual inspection Grading Excavating. Filling 17 Appeal of Admin. Decision 5 Service 19 Large Assembly Permits 24 Commercial Site Plan 2 Special Inspection Charges 18 Lawn Sprinkler System 19 Comprehensive Plan Amend 3 Mechanical Permit Fees 9 Conditional Use Permit Fees 1 Licenses & Miscellaneous Move/Lift Building Permit Fee 18 Industrial Revenue Bond Appl.5 After-The-Fact Fees 5 Municipal Hook Up Park Dedication Fees 7 Amusement Devices 24 (Sewer/Water)9 PUD Rezoning 3 Animal impound Fees 23 On-Site Systems (Septic)17 Rezoning Application Fee 3 Beer, Wine & Liquor License 24 Outhouse Construction 17 Rip Rap Application Fee 5 Cigarette License 22 Parades & Special Events 25 Special Improvements Appl.4 Commercial Marina License 20 Plumbing Permit 9 Subdivision Application Fee 2 Dog License 23 Retaining Walls 8 Surcharge for Staff Expense 5 Dance (Public) License 24 Vacation Application Fee 3 Gambling/Raffle License 22 Variance Application Fee 1 ORDINANCE NO.____, SECOND SERIESAN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1997 FEE SCHEDULE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 143, SECOND SERIES AND NO. 146 SECOND ESThe City Council of the City of Orono ordains Section 1. Ordinance Repealed. Ordinance No. 143 Second Scries, entitled 1996 Fee Schedule and No. 146, Second Series entitled Amendment to 19% Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. The City Council of Orono per Section LOS of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following fe« effective during the calendar year 1997: SECTION 1. Fees. ZONING APPLICATIONS All fees are application fees and arc non-rcfundable after staff work has begun on the application. Application Type VARIANCE (Flexible applications involving more than one variance will require an additional $50.00 payment per each variance) Variance for Non-Conforming Structures RENEWAL VARIANCE (No change from original application) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project) Res* iential Accessory Use (Animals, etc.) Institutional Use (School, Church, etc.) Duplex Credit (per building) Guest House/Gucst Apartment Commercial/Industrial Use Non-Conforming Use $250.00 $250.00 $150.00 $175.00 $250.00 $200.00 $225.00 $300.00 $250.00 Applicable Code Section 10.06, Subd 3 (D) 10.06, Subd 3 (D) 10.09, Subd 3 10.09, Subd 3 10.09, Subd 3 10.09, Subd 3 10.09, Subd 3 10.09, Subd 3 t <“ f 20WINC APPLICATIONS fCONT.)Apiriication TypeCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Continued (One Charge per Project)Land Alteration:Grading, filling, etc. (over .'90 cubic yards)Sea walls, retaining walls within 0-75 ’ lakeshore PRD Application with Subdivision PRD Application without Subdivision PID Applicatioas Renewal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original application) Conditional Use Permit with Variance Afler-the-Fact Fees COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan (Class I, II, & III) Subdivision Application (Class I & II Subdivisions, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) Filing Fees: a) Subdivision only b) Subdivision + Easements & Covenants Renewal of Subdivision Application (Class I & II, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement) (No Change From Original Application) Applicable Code Section10.09, Subd 3$250.00 + permit Subdivision Fee plus $30.00 per dwelling unit $ 35.00 per dwelling unit (minimum $150.00) $150.00 per acre (minimum $350.00) $150.00 Add $ 75.00 for each variance Double Application Fee Res. tll306 & #1309 $250.00 + Cuasultanl Fee $250.00 $350.00 11.10, Subd 7(A) 11.10, Subd 10(A) (B) $375.00 + $25/Iot 11.10, Subd 10(C) ($450/3 lots; $475/4 lots) $200.00 + Special Legal/Engineering Charges 11.10, Subd 17(A) (9) $ 75.00 11.10, Subd 17 (A) (11) $200.00 Minimum plus any additional costs $200.00 ZONING APPLICATIONS <CONT.)Application TypeSUBDIVISION ContinuedRenewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application (Class III) (No change from original application) Renewal of Final Subdivision Application (No change from original application) PUBLIC ROAD VACATION EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS EASEMENT VACATIONS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING PUD Rezoning • Allowed only within area adjacent to Highway 12 as defined in Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 PUD Rezoning: Raidential Commercial/Indastrial REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Applicable Code Section$200.00 $150.00 $ 75.00 per benefitting Section 10.11 property ($300.00 minimum per application) $100.00 Section 10.11 $200.00 Section 10.11 $350.00 Section 10.11 Ord. 74, 2nd Series Section 10.53 $350.00 + $40.00 per dwelling unit $150.00 per acre (min. $350.00) $350.00 Section 10.11 ZONING APPUCATIONS (CONT.)APDlication Type SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTSNon-refundable charges for City Engineer’s review for applications and design drawing, including construction inspection fees. If improvements arc proposed as part of a Subdivision, Review Charges arc payable with Preliminary Plat application. Proposed Private Roads Proposed Public Roads Request for City to accept existing private road Request for City to maintain unimproved public road Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Proposed Watermain Extension Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) On-Site System - Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) Applicable Code SectionSection 11.12, Subd 4 $600.00 plus 50</lincal foot $900.00 plus 5M/li.ieal foot $900.00 $200.00 $250.00 plus $25.00 per stub $250.00 plus $25.00 per stub $200.00 $ 50.00 per new lot proposed for on-site ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.)ADpIication Type Fee Applicable Code SectionRIPRAPStaff Review (normal rip-rap) Unusual Rip-Rap: a) New installation b) Repair previously approved No Charge $100.00 + CUP review Staff permit = $100.00 APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION $100.00 10.65, Subd 3 (D) INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND APPLICATIONS Minimum Project Valuation: $250,000.00 Application Fee:0.1% of project valuation ($250.00 minimum) plus $5,000.00 deposit for legal/ administrative expenses SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF APPLICATION FEES Per Fee Schedule set forth below: Professional Time Clerical Time Legal/Engineering Consultants Mileage/Copies/Pn^age/Etc. Section 10.11 $ 30.00/hour $ 18.00/hour Actual Billed Cost Actual Cost AFTER-THE-FACT APPLICATION INVESTIGATION FEES (Resolution 1306) (Applies to all application types including variances, conditional use permits, subdivision, zoning amendments, rip-rap permits, special improvement reviews, grading permits, moving permits, business liceascs, kennel licenses, all building permits and all general permits.) This permit fee may be waived by staff for resident property owners who have not involved a contractor in their work, have no previous histor}' of work without a permit and where such work does not entail any zoning violations. ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.)AfTER-THE-FACT APPLICATION INVESTIGATION FEES Coatinucd Applicable Code Section Whenever any work, use or division of land for which a formal application is required has been commenced without first making such application and receiving City approval therefore, a special investigation of the circumstances shall be made during the application process. Because of the extra administrative costs involved in the special investigation, the minimum application fee for after-the-fact applications shall be twice the fee set forth in the basic fee schedule, whether or not the application is thereafter approved or denied. Payment of an after-the-fact application fee shall not coastitute approval or authorization of the work, use, or division of land, and shall not constitute a penalty or a waiver of the right of the City to institute civil or criminal legal actions against the applicant for commencing such work, use or division of land without the required prior approval of the City. After-the-fact Investigation Fee Amount:Equal to and in addition to the basic fee amount (total fee is twice the basic fee amount). Res. 1306 % ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.)Applicable Code SectionPARK DEDICA VJtW FEES I Municipal Code Section 11.62 l-anH fV-digation Minimum Area - Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (1) Residential/Agricultural/Multiple Residential Zoned Land. Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. (Exclusive of lot that includes an existing residence.) (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedicated requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. rath Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEESPermit Type BUILDING PERMIT Fee Applicable Code Section(Ord. 216) Minimum Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial Residential Building Valuation Standard $21.00 (per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) 65% of Building Permit Fee (per Current I.C.B.O. Building Standards/Building Valuation Data) ZONING CERTinCATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHOLT BUILDING PERMIT (change In use) $50.00 RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42" also multiple tiered wails that exceed 42" and not located in lakeshore protected area) NOTE: Retaining walls in 0-75’ lakeshore protected zone - see Cond. Use Permit section of fee schedule. $21.00 minimum (per 1994 UBC Standard Schedule) TREE REMOVAL WITHIN 0-75’ CKS - RESIDENTIAL (Permanent and Initial Seasonal) $30.00 $30.00 Ord. 10.22 Subd 3 CKS - COMMERCIAL Per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule DEMOLITION PERMIT Principal Structure Accessory Structure (Ord. 216) $ 50.00 Initial inspection $ 25.00 for each requested or required inspection beyond initial inspection $ 30.00 Initial inspection 8 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.)Permit Type PLUMBING PERMIT Mail-in postage & handling chan'c MECHANICAL PERMIT Minimum Fee for any Mechanical Permit Mail-in postage & handling charge Residential. Single Family & Duplex by Unit Type Under Ground Tank Removal Commercial. Industrial and Multi-Family Residential by Unit Type SPRINKLER SYSTEMS - COMMERCIAL -fire sprinkler systems -kitchen fire extinguishing system MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area connection charges) Sewer Water 5/8" meter including sales tax 3/4" meter including sales tax 1" meter including sales tax larger meter Mail-in postage & handling charge (sewer and water permits only) Applicable Co^ Section $ 35.00 minimum per project 1.25% of contract price $ 1.50 $ 35.00 per project $ 1.50 1.25% of contract price Per mechanical permit fees $ 35.00 minimum fee 1.25% of contract price $ 35.00 minimum fee 1.25% of contract price Surcharge based on valuation $ 35.00 per system $35.00 $35.00 $139.00 $191.00 $247.00 quote basis $ 1.50 ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CCMSNECTION CHARGES (If not previous! v assessed or if an improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City, if an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which arc located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connectioas are subject to City (Jouncil approval. SEWER PROJECTS 1 By District - Project Fixed Charge +Unit Charge +Area Or Acreage Charge 4- Front Foot Charge i Credit To Area 1 1963 ST-IA, LS-IA, ST-IB, LS-IB $ 225.00 $515.00/acre $ 37.20 (1) 1964 LS-IA or LS-IB $ 225.00 $ 38.10 (1) 1965 LS-1 $ 225.00 $ 56.15 (1) 1965 LS-IA $ 225.00 $40.90 (1) 1967 LS-1 $ 245.00 $ 24.40 (1) 1969 LS-1 Shore Hills $ 225.00 $12,120.00 (1) 1969 LS-2 Chevy Chase $ 8,685.00 (1) 1970 LS-1 Saga Hill $ 225.00 $ 4,750.00 $ 28.60 (1) 1971 LS-1 Dunwoody $ 225.00 $ 4,230.00 $26.00 (1) 1 1973-1 $ 8,200.00 $38.90 (1) 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs $10,485.00 (1) CREDIT TO AREA; (1) '' ■‘'’-37691 Sewer Operating (2) 3U2-3769I 1982 Improve & I'6 By Pass (3) 304-3791 1985 Improve Crystal Bay (5) 406-37691 PIR Fund #7LS & Forcemain (6) 308-37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL W ATER CONNECTION CHARGES Of nol previously assessed or if an improvement project b not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement b required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections are subject to City Council approval. 1980-1 West Femdale/County Road 15 $30,640.00 (1) 1980-1 Orono l^ne $19,630.00 (1) 1980-1 County Road 15/Marinas $ 8,170.00 (1) 1980-2 North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine Lane $28,895.00 (1) 1981-1 North Shore Drive/Highwood $12,540.00 (1) 1982-1A Navarre Utilities $ 2,670.00 $1,095.00 trunk area (3) 1982-lB Navarre Utilities Northern Avenue $ 225.00 (1)$ 217.00 (3) (trunk unit acre/unit) $ 2,885.00 per acre (3) (1) & (3) 1985-1 Crystal Bay $12,675.00 (4) 1983-1 Highway 12 Orono-Long Lake- Medina $ 1,191.00 (1) 1989 Highway 12 - Phase 1 - North Side 1 Brown Rd to Willow Dr $ 1,138.00 (1) CREDIT TO AREA; (1) 602*37691 Sewer Operating (2) 302-37691 1982 Improve & #6 By Pass (3) 304-3791 1985 Improve Crystal Bay (5) 406-37691 PIR Fund #7LS & Forcemain (6) 308-37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or if an improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole disoetion of the City. If an improvoncnt is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections are subject to City Council approval. 1989 Highway 12 - Phase II - Future Trunk Expansion $ 2,092.00 (1) 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer I Stubbs Bay NE/NW - Bayside East $14,270.00 (6) II Bederwood $22,090.00 (6) III Bayside North $18,700.00 (6) IV Oxford $26,395.00 (6) V Cygnet and Leaf $21,330.00 (6) CREDIT TO AREA; (1) 602-37691 Sewer Operating (2) 302-37691 1982 Improve & By Pass (3) 304-3791 1985 Improve Crystal Bay (5) 406-37691 PIR Fund Jf7LS & Forcemain (6) 308-37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If n<A previously assessed or if an Improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an Improvement Is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any asse^nent.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which arc located outside the delineated boundaries of the afrectcd project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections arc subject to City Council approval. 1984 Forcemain and Lift Station HI upgrade: (An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from the 1984 forcemain and lift station !fl upgrade, as follows, see map for affected areas): All Charges Are Per Unit Existing Properties/Increase New Bldgs Replacing Existing Bldgs (If usage increases from existing) New Residential w/Existing Stub New Residential without Stub Freshwater Biological (Inch "Marsh at Lafayette’ Lots) Fixed Charge +#6 By Pass + $225.00 (1) $ 225.00 (1) $ 216.50 (3) $ 216.50 (3) in Forcemain $484.00 $484.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 (5) $ 545.00 (5) Per unit on connection (previously assessed $2,000/acre) Credit To Area (1), (3) and (5) (1), (3) and (5) mEDlT TO AREA; (1) 602-37691 Sewer Operating (2) 302-37691 1982 Improve & #6 By Pass (3) 304-3791 1985 Improve Crystal Bay (5) 406-37691 PIR Fund #7LS & Forcemain (6) 308-37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or If an improvement project is not deemed to be required in the sole discretion of the City, if an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.)The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project area shall be charged the connection fee for that area. Such connections arc subject to City Council approval. 1989 Gravity Line and Lift Station ^10 By Pass: An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from the 1989 gravity line and lift station #10 by-pass per Resolution #2671: Fixed Charge +#10 By Pass Credit To Area (see map for affected areas)$ 225.00 $2,470.00 (1) CREDIT TO AREA; (1) 602-37691 Sewer Operating (2) 302-37691 1982 Improve & t'6 By Pass (3) 304-3791 1985 Improve Crystal Bay (5) 406-37691 PIR Fund #7LS & Forcemain (6) 308-37691 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If not previously assessed or in an improvement project is not deoned to be required in the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement is required, the connection charge may be In addition to any assessment.) The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water but which are located outside the delineated boundaries of the affected project ara «hait be charged the connection fee for the area. Such connections are subject to City Council approval. WATER PROJECTS By District - Project Fixed Charge +Unit Charge +Area Or Acreage Charge -1- Front Foot Charge Credit To Area 1%7 LW-1 Highway 12/Crystal Bay Road $4,119.00 $ 30.60 (1) 1%9 LW-2 Chevy Chase $ 4,082.00 (1) 1970 LW-1 Navarre Residential $ 2,039.00 $ 20.35 (1) 1970 LW-1 Navarre Commercial $ 3,060.00 $ 30.60 (1) 1982-1 A Navarro $2,173.00 (2) 1989 Highway 12 - Phase I - North Side Water Trunk - Brown Rd to Willow Dr $ 644.00 (1) 1989 Highway 12 - Phase II - 1 Water Tower, Well, & 1 Pumphouse $4,719.00 (1) j CREDIT TO AREA: (1) 601-37391 Water Operating (2) 302-37391 1982 Improve water SEWER AND WATER UNIT ADJUSTMENT CHARGESCHARGESCharges shall result from either an intensification of an existing non-residential use or a new non-residential use that replaces a former use on a property located within an area already assessed and served by municipal sewer and water. CREDIT Credit for previously assessed sewer or water units shall be applied against the total number of sewer and water units established for the new use. UNIT CHARGE Each sewer and each water unit adjustment charge shall be equal to the current Service Availability Charge established by the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services or its successor and shall be payable to the City of Orono upon application for a building permit. i CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEESPennit TvpcON-SITE SYSTEMS Design Review Fees Subdivision Site Evaluation Report Review Residential System Permit: Repair existing system New/Replacement System Non-Residential System Permit: New or Total replacement Partial replacement Annual Service Charge ApplicableFee Code Section(Ord. 210) Included with pennit fees $ 50.00/per new lot $50.00 $100.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 3 (Includes outhouse on Big bland) $100.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 4 $ 60.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 2 $ 50.00/systan/yoir plus an additional $10.00 fee for late penalty plus 8% interest for unpaid charges certified SecUon 12.30, Subd 8(C) GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING -101 + cubic yards - 1-100 cubic yard ( max. 10 loads) $ 50.00 (staff permit) + engineering fees if required ($100.00 if engineering fee necessary) $ 75.00 + Conditional Use Permit + $25.00 per oich inspection over 1st NOTE: 101 cubic yards or more requires a Conditional Use Pennit unless approved as part of building pennit. SIGNS Temporary Permanent $35.00 (Per 1994 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION I-TES (CONT.)Permit Type BUILDING MOVING OR LDTING Fe« for this activity arc in addition to required buildine or dtniolition permits. •Pre-move code inspection, principal buildings: a) Building within Orono to be relocated wUhin Orono b) Building outside Orono to be moved into Orono (max. radius 25 miles) SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site Inspection without permit (when called by owner) Inspection surcharge for work or application on Big Island or Deering Island Reinspection fee after failure to comply with Building, Septic or Zoning Code Correction Notice - 3rd trip Fee Applicable Code Section (Ord. 227) $50.00 $150.00 $30.00 $30.00 per trip + boat rental if transportation is not provided by owner $ 30.00 per trip + $30.00 per hour after 1st hour 18 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.>Permit TypeFIRE PROTECTION Fire Prevention Inspection Fire Code Permits Commercial Fire Alarm Plan Review Fee LAWN SPRBvKLER SYSTEM BURNING PERMITS Up to 5 times per year For Each Reinspection More than 5 times per year (for all organizations and individuals regardless of tax status) CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE Monthly Retainer Fee (Includes clerical time) Inspection Charge Plan Review Charge Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use is excessive) Fee Applicable Code Section(Ord. 223) No Charge $ 30.00 each Per UBC Schedule 65% of permit fee $35.00 No Charge $20.00 $100.00 Per Contract $ 25.00 per month $ 15.00 per inspection SBC/UBC Schedule $ 15.00 per hour LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGESPwmit Type Zoning Department Administered Fee Applicable Code Section COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application & Inspection Fee (annual) plus: •late fee $300.00 $200.00 $100.00 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application Fee Plus each slip Late Fee $50.00 $20.00 $ 2.00 $ 25.00 GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE • flat rate - per hauler • transfer fee $30.00 $ 15.00/truck $30.00 HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE $ 50.00 Initial Review Fee $ 30.00 (Annual Review Fee) TEMPORARY TRAILERS & BUILDINGS LICENSE $30.00 LICENSES & MISCELLANKOUS CHARGKS (CONT.)Permit Tydc Fee ApplicableCodeSection Zoning Deoartment Administered ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS Comprehensive Guide Plan -1980 (with amendments) Municipal Code Book • complete (Ch. 1-12 w/revisions) Municipal Code Book • Portions Ch 1 thru 9 (Book 1) w/revisions Ch 10 thru 12 (Book 2) w/revisions Ch H) only (Zoning Code) w/revisions Ch 11 only (Subdiv. Code) w/revisions Other Individual Chapters Binder Comp. Plan Amendment #2 (Hwy 12) $30.00 $ 60.00 w/binder $ 35.00 loose $ 35.00 loose $ 25.00 loose $ 15.00 loose $ .25/page $ 5.00 $ 5.00 LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHAR(;ES (CONT.)Document Type City Maps Topographic Information Building & Planning Publications General Administrative Licenses Cigarette Sales Licenses - per quarter Gambling & Raffle License Solicitation License Up to 10 solicitors - $1.00 each additional solicitor in Orono. Applicant must list only po^ns that will solicit in Orono. General Administrative Documents Listing Information Assessment Search - Written (Verbal searches not given) Copy Service (for public City records only) 11" X 17" copies Individual copies of Ordinances (1 copy) Reprint of Oversized Documents that have been microfilmed Building Plan Copies and/or Tape Recording Duplication Current Street Addr^ Book Applicable Co^ Section $ 2.00 each $ 12.00 per acre + engineering consultant fee if computer diskette is required As Posted - Prices subject to change $ 5.00 $ 10.00 $20.00 S.24 5.23 5.30 $ 10.00 $ 15.00/parcel $ .25 each $ 1.00 each No Charge Cost of copying service, Messenger service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 C(»t of Copying, Messenger Service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 (entire amount to be paid upon request) $ 25.00 LICENSES A MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.)Permit TypeDogs & Kamels DOG LICENSES Biannual License (issued in odd years) Annual License (issued in even years only) KENNEL LICENSES Commercial Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) Residoitial Appiiation & Inspection Fee (Annual) NOTE: Dogs kept in residential kennds must be individually licensed. Residential kennel fee is in addition to dog license fem. DOGS AT LARGE • RELEASE FEE First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Alter Hour & Weekend Release Charge ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) - Release Fee First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL Applicable Code Section 9.12 $ 15.00 $ 7.50 J 5J6 $150.00 $25.00 9.12 $25.00 $ 35.00 $45.00 $45.00 9.13 $25.00 $40.00 $55.00 $ 25.00/hour $ 35.00 plus .25 mile (total distance) Actual Cost OrFNSRS A MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.)Ptfmit TypePtUicg Department AdministeredBEER, WINE & LIQUOR LICENSES Initial Invetigation On-Sale/OTr-Sale Liquor In state investigation Out state investigation Initial Investigation - Beer/Wine Off-Sale Liquor License Bond Requironent On-Sale Liquor License On-Sale Wine License 3.2 Beer Off-Sale (Annual) 3.2 Beer On-Sale (Annual) Sctup( Annual) Club Liquor License (weekday) (Sunday) Temporary Set-up Permit (one day) Tonporary Beer Permit (one day) AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Establishment (Annual) Per Machine Fee PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE (annual) (Individual Permit) LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT FIREWORKS PERMIT FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT Occasional (limited use) Game Animals (limited use) Annual (Club Only) FIREARMS PERMIT TO CARRY LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT Applicable Code Section$500.00 per LicenseCollected at Application Actual cost up to $10,000 Actual cost $150.00/person Res. $150.00 4.30 $5,000.00 $4,000.00 4.30 $750.00 4.40 $ 25.00 4.20 $75.00 4.20 $100.00 4.60 $100.00 4.50 $200.00 4.50 $ 25.00/each 4.61 $ 15.00/each 4.21 5.20 $100.00 + machine f<'e $ 25.00 each $100.00 5.21 $ 10.00 5.21 $50.00 5.25 $50.00 9.10 9.10 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 10.00 $20.00 9.119.11, Ord. 232 &Ord. 243 UCENSES & mSCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.)Apolkatloii TypePftlkc Department AdministeredPARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT Fee$50.00 Applicable Code Scctioii6.08FALSE ALARM USER FEESFirst 3 false alanns/calendar year (1-3 total) Next 3 false alarms/calendar year (4-6 total) Next 3 false alanns/calendar year (7-9 total) Each additiuoal false alarm over 10/ calendar year No Charge $ 75.00 each call $150.00 each call $250.00 «ich odl FlNGERPRD»mNG SERVICE $ 15.00/appUcaUon - RESIDENT ONLY (Citizenship No Charge) COPY SERVICE - Police Records First Two Copies Additional Co|des COPY OF ACCIDENT REPORTS COPY OF DRIVER’S LICENSE RECORD COPY FROM MlCROnCHE FILE First Two Copies Additional Copies "NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE" paper dgns (no lath included) TAPE DUPLICATION $ 5.00 $ 0.25 each $ 5.00 each $ 5.00 each $ 10.00 $ .50 each $ 0.25 each $ 10.00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCKiJ.ANK.ODS CHARGESUtility Service Rates - Effective beginning First Quarter 1997MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: 1st 2nd by flow; $ 74.00 per quarter $ 66.95 per quarter $ 2.79/1000 gallon plus $7.05 per quarter per connection MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE STUBBS BAY AREA PROJECT For those properties unconnected between 16 months after service availability and up to 5 years after service availability and meeting the criteria set forth in Ordinance No. 105, Second Series, allowing for hookup time extension, shall be charged only for the City portion of the sewer unit rate and not for the MWCC portion of the sewer unit rate. Stubbs Bay Area Un>Cunnccted Properties $ 33.60 per quarter PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANKOUS CHARGES (CONT.>Utility Service Rates - ContinuedAreaMUNICIPAL WATER RATES Navarre Hwy 12 Area Chevy Chase AreaBilling & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Properly Chg (ready to serve/hydrant chg) $21.30/qtr $7.8S/qtr $7.85/qtr $ i.81/1000 gal $2.51/1000 gal $2.01/1000 gal $21.30/qtr -0- -0- Federally Mandated Safe Drinking Water Testing Program (Charged per service connection) $ 5.21 per y«ur on second quarter billing; Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area - Area #1 Rate $21.30/qtr billing charge plus $1.81/1000 gallon total flow at border meter. Penalty for late payment of sewer/water bills - 15% after 45 da> s from billing date. Interest at 8% on unpaid watcr/sewer bills certified. Water Tum-On Water Turn-off $ 18.00 Minimum $ 18.00 Minimum Water System Repair/Replacement if damage caused by property owner: Labor - Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost RECYCLING CHARGE Recycling Container - Initial Re|dacement (including sales tax) $ 22.60/year No Charge $ 6.50 each L PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.)FeeGOLF COURSE CHARGES - EITecfive dale 1997 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays)Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon Season Ticket (Senior Citizens Only)$130.00 GOLF CART RENTAL Motorized: 1st Nine Holes (After 12:00 & Weekends) $ 10.00 2nd Nine Holes $ 8.00 Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Pull Carts - Per Round Golf clubs • Per Round $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.50 STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 - 17) Begin Play Before Noon Monday • Friday, Excluding Holidays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ 5.S0 $ 5.50 CONCESSIONS r As Posted 1st Nine Holes $7.75 FALL RATES 2nd Nine Holes $5.50 Will begin the Monday nearest the 15th of September. After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Hol«$9.50 - Weekend Rates: 2nd Nine Holes $7.00 1st Nine $7.75 2nd Nine Holes $5.50 2nd Nine $5.50 (Weekday After 12:00 Noon)Riding Cart $7.00/per League Rates Monday thru Friday $8.75 - Weekda> Rates:« 1st Nine $6.00 Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old)2nd Nine $4.00 Begin Play Before 12:00 No«»n - Weekdays Sr. & Jr.$4.00 1st Nine Holes $5.50 Riding Cart $5.00/per 2nd Nine Holes $5.50 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES FeeStreet or Traffic Signs $ 75.00/std. sign(sale includes installation) Driveway Culverts On Quote Basis(sale only, not installed)Water Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Temporary No Parking Signs (with lath)$ 1.00 each Driveway/Curb-Cut Permits $ 30.00/permitIndividual Driveways New Street Intersections (See zoning section - Special improvement fees) i SECTION 2. This ordinance establishing the 1997 Fee Schedule shall be published in the Uker and Pioneer Newspaper and shaU be efTecUve the wedt of J 1, 1997. ( , 1996. iAdopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Uallin, City Clerk Summary ordinance published in the Laker/Pioneer newspaper the week of ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked Official Summary of Ordinance Number ___, Second Series," and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that the publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES ORDINANCE NO.___, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1997 FEE SCHEDULE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 143, SECOND SERIES and NO. 146, SECOND SERIES. The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number ___, Second Series approved by the City Council of the City of Orono on______________, 1996. The following section have changes, additions and/or deletions; DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES Commercial Industrial and Multi-Family Residential by Unit Type 1996 FEE 1997 FEE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS - COMMERCIAL - fire sprinkler systems S35.00 minimum fee 1.25% of contract price Plan Review =65% permit fee Surcha' based on valuation all sanitary sewer and MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTIONS CHARGES $35.00 minimum fee 125% of coiract price Surcharge based on valuation Various Charges Various Charges CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AM) INSPECTION IT.ES SIGNS Temporary S 30.00 $35.00 BUILDING MOVING OR LIFFING Fees for this activity arc in addition to required building or demolition permits. Fees ond any necessary surchoi^cs ore roquifcd to pay--costs of building code inspections! public works inspections of streets and reosonaMo police escort service on ovcff sitfr movements* - Lifting accessory buildings • Lifting principal buildings - Moving accessory building within normal highway clearance - Moving accessory building larger than normal highway clearance $ 30.00 deleted $75.00 + engineering fee if necessary deleted No moving permit required $ 50.00 deleted deleted DESCRIPTION BUILDING MOVING OR LIFTING Continued - Moving principal buildings over any lot line, onto or off any lot within Orono; includes any move on or over any City street even if not originating or terminating in Orono General Administrative Documents Current Street Address Book IJCENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES GS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE First Offense Second Offense Third Offense ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) - Release Fee First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge FALSE ALARM USER FEES First 3 false alarms/calendar year (1-3 total) Next ? 3 false alarms/calendar year (4-40 4-6 total) Next 5 3 false alarms/calendar year (44-i# 7-9 total) Each additional false alarm over 45 10/ calendar year 1996 FEE $150.00 $ 15.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 S 20.00/hour S 20.00 plus .25C mile No Charge S 50.00 each call $100.00 each call $150.00 each call PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCEI.LANEOUS CHARGES Utility Service Rales - Effective beginning First (Quarter 1997 MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: 1st each add'l by flow; $ 72.00/qtr $65.15/qtr $ 2.71/1000 gallon plus S6.85 per qtr per connection 33 1997 FEE deleted $25.00 1 $25.00 $35.00 $45.00 $ 25.00 $40.00 $ 55.00 $ 25.00/hour $ 35.00 plus .25C mile No Charge $ 75.(X) each call $150.00 each call $250.00 each call $ 74.00/per -itr $ 66.95/per qtr $ 2.79/1000 gal $ 7.05 per quarter per conn DESCRIPTION 1996 FEE 1997 FEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Continued Stubbs Bay Area Un-Connected Propenies $32.60 $ 33.60 MUNICIPAL water RATES Navarre Area Billing & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Propeny Chg (ready to serve/hydrant chg) Hwv 12 Area Billing & Ready to 'i -ve Chg Water Usage Ratr Unconnected Proper Tag (ready to ser\T/h'‘^t^t *g) Chevy (Thase Billing & Ready to w ^ Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Property Chg (ready to serve/hydrant chg) Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area Area #1 rate total flow at bordei meter. $ 20.70/qtr $ 1.76/1000 gal S 20.70/qtr $ 7.60/qtr $ 2.44/1000 gal -0- S 7.60/qtr $ 1.95/1000 gal -0- $ 20.70/qtr + S 1.76/1000 gal $21.30/qtr $ 1.81/1000 gal S21.30/q»r $ 7.85/qtr $ 2.51/lQOOgal -0- $ 7.85/qtr $ 2.01/1000 gal -0- S 22.30/qtr + $ 1.81/1000 gal Water Tum-On Water Turn-Off RECYCLING CHARGE $ 17.50 $ 17.50 $ 22.00/year PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 18.00 minimum $ 18.(X) minimum $ 22.60/year GOLF COURSE CHARGES Monda> thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes $ 7.50 S 5.00 $ $ 7.75 5.50 After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes 2nd Ni'’'* )lcs (Weekd.i^ After 12:00 Noon) S 9.00 $ 6.50 S 5.00 $ S $ 9.50 7.00 5.50 44 DESCRIPTION 1996 FEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CR4RGES Continued GOLF COURSE CHARGES Continued 1997 EEE League Rates Monday thru Frida\'S 8.50 $ 8.75 Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdays 1st Nine Holes $ 5.00 $ 5.50 2nd Nine Holes $ 5.00 $ 5.50 Season Ticket (Senior citizens Only)S125.00 $130.00 STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 - 17) Begin Play Before Noon Monday • Friday, Excluding Holidays 1st Nine Holes S 5.00 $ 5.50 2nd Nine Holes S 5.00 $ 5.50 FALL RATES Will begin the Monday nearest the 15th of September. • Weekend Rates: 1st Nine S 7.50 $ 7.75 2nd Nine S 5.00 $ 5.50 - Weekday Rates: 1st Nine S 5.00 $ 6.00 2nd Nine S 3.00 $ 4.00 Sr. & Jr.$ 3.00 $ 4.00 1 A printed copy of the 1997 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk during regular office hours This ordinance becomes effective the week of January 2, 1997. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this ayes and___nays. day of December, 1996, by a vote ATTEST: Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Hoi, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^5 CTv, Date: November 19, 1996 Item No: / ^ Department Approval: Gary Cheswick-r^^Sl'^^? Administrator Reviewed; Name: Title:Chief of Police Agenda Section: Item Description:NOISE ORDINANCE Exhibits:Draft of Noise Ordinance DISCUSSION Review of current ordinance relating to excessive noise within city limits provides for limited enforcement action options, lack of definition, and fragmentation throughout the c ty code. A model policy from the League of Cities is attached and provides the necessary elements to enforce noise complaints. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt draft ordinance relating to noise. ORDLNAiNCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO NOISE CONTROL AN ORDINANCE REPEALING; Ordinance No. 22, Second Series, Sub. 1(N), adopted March 10, 1986, and entitled "Shows and Large Assemblies"; Section 7.14, adopted April 1, 1984, and entitled "Honking Horns"; Section 7.30 Sub. 2(1) and (K) and Sub. 5(A), adopted April 1, 1984, entitled "Recreational .Motor Vehicles (Including Snowmobiles)"; Section 9.20, (1), (3) and (7), adopted April 1, 1984, and entitled "Disorderly Conduct"; Ordinance #51, Second Series, (8), adopted May 9, 1988, entitled "Disorderly Conduct"; Ordinance #51, Second Series, Sub. 1(A), adopted May 9,1988, entitled "Public Nuisance"; and Ordinance No. 108, Second Series, (A), adopted August 24, 1992, entitled "Participation In Noisy Parties or Gatherings". The City Council of Orono ordains: CHAPTER 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES IS HEREBY .AMENDED BY THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING SECTION: SECTION 9.58 NOISE CONTROL 1.Definition. Except as provided in this section, words or phrases used in this chapter and defined in the rules of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Noise Section, Chapter 7010, shall have the meanings given in those rules. A. A-Weighted. A specific weighing of the sound pressure level for the purpose of determining the human response to sound. The specific weighing characteristics and tolerances are those given in American National Standards Institute 1.4-1983, Section 5.1. B. Cut-Out or By-Pass. Mechanism which varies the exhaust system gas flow so as to discharge the exhaust gas and acoustic energy to the atmosphere without passing through the entire length of the system including all exhaust system sound attenuation components. C. dB (A). A unit of sound level expressed in decibels (dB) and A-weighted, D. Exhaust System. Combination of components which provides an enclosed flow of exhaust gas from engine parts to the atmosphere. E. Holiday. Any day fixed by the United States or by Minnesota State Law for suspension of business in whole or in part. F. LIO. The sound level, expressed in dB (A) which is exceeded 10 percent of the time for a one hour period, as measured by test procedures approved by the Director of the MPCA. G. L50. The sound level, expressed in dB (A) which is exceeded by 50 percent of the time for a one hour period, as measured by test procedures approved by the Director of the MPCA. H. MPCA. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. I J. K. L. M. Municipality. The City of Orono. Noise. Any sound not occurring in the natural environment, including but not limited to, sounds emanating from airways, roadways, waterways, industrial, commercial and residential sources. Noise Control Officer. The Noise Control Officer shall be the City of Orono planning and zoning administrator, police official or other person appointed by the City Council. Noise Pollution. The presence of any noise or combination of noises in such quantity, at such levels, or such nature and duration or under such conditions as could potentially be injurious to human health, safety, or welfare; or to animal life; or could interfere unreasonably with the enjoyment of life or property. Person. Any individual, firm partnership, corporation, trustee, association, the State and its agencies and subdivision, or any body of persons whether incorporated or not. With respect to acts prohibited or required herein, person shall include employees and licensees. General Noise Standards A. Incorporation by Reference. The MPCA Noise Rule, Chapter 7010.0010 through 7010.0080, and all amendments thereof and supplements thereto are hereby referred to, adopted incorporated by reference, and made a part of this ordinance. A current copy shall be available for public inspection through the City of Orono City Clerk ’s office. B. Maximum Noise Levels by Receiving Land Use Districts. No person shall operate or cause or permit to be operated any source of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level outdoors exceeding the dB limit set in Table 1 for the receiving land use district specified. TABLE 1 SOUND LEVELS BY RECEIV ING LAND USE DISTRICTS Land Use District Residential Day (7 A.M. - 10 P.M.) LIO L5Q 6065 Niaht (10 P.M. - 7 A M.) LIO L50 55 50 EXEMPTIONS The levels prescribed above do not apply to special events approved by the City Council of the City of Orono which sliall be preceded by an application tor the special event to be exempt from noise standards, and a finding of the City Council that the proposed event will not adversely affect the citizens of Minnetonka Beach, and is otherwise consistent w ith the public health, safety, and welfare of the City. The levels prescribed above do not apply to trains operating on the existing train tracks through the City of Orono so long as the use complies with all other applicable county, state and federal standards and said use is not in any expanded in terms of scope or duration. 3. Noises Prohibited Horn, Audible and Signaling Devices, Etc. No person shall sound any signaling device on any vehicle except as a warning of danger (M.S. 169.68). B Engine Exhausts. No person shall discharge the exhaust or permit the discharge of the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine, m^'tor boat, motor vehicle, motorcycle, all terrain vehicle, snowmobile or any recreational device except through a muffler or other device that effectively prevents loud or explosive noises therefrom and complies with all applicable state laws, regulations and this ordinance. Radios, Phonographs, Televisions, Paging Systems, Etc No perc- .• shall use or operate or permit the use or operation ot any radio receiving <' isical instrument, phonograph, television, paging system, machine or otii.*'’ de.' for production or reproduction of sound in a distinctly and loudly audible manner so as to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of any person nearby. Operation of any such set, instrument, phonograph, machine orbther device between the hours oHO P.M. and 7 A.M., in such a manner as to be plainly audible at the property line of the structure or building in which it is located outside a stnicture or building, shall be prima facie evidence of violation of this section. D. Social Gatherings. No person shall participate in any party or other gatherings of people giving rise to noise which disturbs the peace, quiet or repose of the occupants of adjoining or other property. When a police officer determines that a gathering is creating such noise disturbance, the officer shall order all persons present, other u.an the owner or tenant of the premises where the disturbance is occurring, to disperse immediately. No persons shall refuse to leave after being ordered by a police officer to do so. Every owner or tenant of such premises who has knowledge of the disturbance shall cooperate with police officers and shall make ;very reasonable effort to see that the disturbance is abated. A violation of »his ordinance shall be deemed to be the act of the owner of the residential dwelling unit wherein it occurs as well as the persons on the premises who v iolate the ordinance except that the owner of the dwelling unit occupied by other shall be liable only for those violations occurring after a written notice of the violation of this ordinance shall have been received. E. Loudspeakers, Amplifiers, Etc. No person shall operate or permit the use or operation of any loudspeaker, sound amplifier, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound on a street or other public place for the purpose of attracting attention of the public. F. Churches, Etc. No person shall create any excessive noise on a street, alley or public grounds adjacent to a church or other place of worship. G. Human Noise. No person shall engage in yelling, shouting, screaming, whistling, or singing at any time or place so as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort, or repose of any persons in any residence or dwelling in the vicinity of the source. 4. Hourly Restriction for Certain Operations A. Domestic Power Equipment. No person shall operate a garden or lawn tractor, power lawn mower, power hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, edger, power device for bug eradication, drill, or other similar domestic power maintenance equipment except between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10 P.M. on any week day or between the hours of 9 A.M. and 10 P.M. on weekends and holidays. Snow removal equipment is exempt from this provision. B. Refuse Hauling. No person shall collect or remove garbage or refuse in any residential district except between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10 P.M. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 9 P.M. on any weekend or holiday. C. Construction Activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any electric, diesel, or gas-powered machine or D. other power equipment except between the hours of 7:30 A.M. and 5:30 P.M. week days. Loading, unloading, unpacking. No person shall create loud or excessive noise in loading, unloading, or unpacking any vehicle. 5. Exception for Emergency Work A.Noise created exclusively in the performance of emergency work to preserve the public health, safety or welfare, or in the performance of emergency work necessary to restore public service or eliminate a public hazard shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance for a period not to exceed 48 hours after the work is commenced. Persons responsible for such work shall inform the noise control officer of the need to initiate such work or, if the work is commenced during non-business hours of the City, at the beginning of business hours of the first day thereafter. Any person responsible for such emergency work shall take all reasonable actions to minimize the amount of noise and the duration thereof. Powers and Duti^ of Noise Control Officer A. Administering Officer. The noise control program established by this ordinance shall be administered by the Noise Control Officer. B. Testing Procedures. The Noise Control Officer shall adopt guidelines establishing the test procedures and instrumentation used in enforcing the provisions of this section. A copy of such guidelines shall be kept in the office of the Orono City Clerk and shall be available to the public for reference during business hours. C. Investigation and Inspection. The Noise Control Officer, with the assistance of other professional agencies or persons as may be necessary, shall conduct all research monitoring and other studies related to sound as are necessary in order to enforce this ordinance and shall make all investigations and inspections in accordance with law as required in applying the provisions of this ordinance. D. Noise Impact Statements. The Noise Control Officer may require any person applying to the City for a change in zoning, permit, license for any stiucture, operation, process, installation, or alteration or project that may be considered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement on a form prescribed by the officer. Each such statement shall be reviewed to ascertain whether the granting of such change in zoning, permit, or license would result in the violation of any provision of this ordinance. Reviews of Noise Impact Statements shall be made by the Planning Commission, if appropriate, and recommendations shall be made to the City Council. E.Other Powers and Duties. The Noise Control Officer shall exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as are reasonable and necessary to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. 7.Enforcement and Penalties A. B Notice. When the Noise Control Officer, after appropriate testing has been done, determines that a noise exceeds the maximum sound level permitted under this ordinance, or otherwise constitutes a nuisance, the noise control officer shall give written notice of the violation to the owner or occupant of the premises where the noise originates, and order such person to correct or remove each specified violation within such reasonable time as is prescribed in the notice. In all other cases, the Noise Control Officer or the City ’s law enforcement officer may demand immediate termination of the excessive noise. Failure to adhere to such demand would subject the violator to appropriate criminal enforcement procedures. Penalties. Any person violating this ordinance or any of its sections shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and in addition, shall be subject to injunctive relief which the City may exercise to pursue through a court of competent jurisdiction or State administrative agency as may be appropriate. Each day that a violation hereto continues shall constitute a separate violation. C. Effective Date. This ordinatice shall take effect 30 days after its publication. Passed by the City Council this day of . 19 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Published in the Laker and Pioneer newspaper the week of Cotwc/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Nov 2 5 cnvop, 1S96 DATE: November ITEM NO: / / Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse L City Administrators Title City Administrator Report Item Description: 1997 Non-Union Compensation Adjustments Attachments: 1. 2. 1997 Pay Schedule Resolution Approving 1997 Pay Plan Adjustments The following wage and insurance adjustments for non-union staff are proposed for Council approval. 1. 0 «■) • Pay: Increase pay ranges by 3.0% Insurance Contribution: No change 3. Mileage Reimbursement Rate: Increase from $.30/mile to $.31 per mile for the use of a personal vehicle for city business. Compensation Adjustment Criteria An outline of the criteria on which pay and insurance adjustments are generally based is as follows: A.Pay Adjustment Criteria 1.Cost of living increase a.) US consumer price index; annualized increase from October ’95 to October ’96 is 3.0%. b.) Minneapolis/St. Paul consumer price index: annualized increase from the first half of 1995 to the first half of 1996 (July ’95 to July ’96) is 3.1%. 2. Market comparison: Nearly all cities surveyed are considering pay adjustments for 1997 of 3.0%. 1997 Non-Union Wage and Insurance Adjustments November 18, 1996 page 2 of 2 The three percent increase in the pay schedule is larger than the 2.75% increase proposed during the IW7 budget work sessions. However, both the CPI increase and the market comparison stroii^iy suggest a three percent increase. The three percent increase can be accommodated within the proposed budget and tax levy. B.Insurance Contribution Adjustment Criteria 1, 1997 insurance premium increases (family coverage) Plan 1996 Premium 1997 Premium Dollar Difference Percent Difference Medica $449.05 $490.85 $ 41.80 9.3% Group Health $443.32 $417.43 $-25.80 -5.9% Med Centers $464.63 $451.86 $-12.77 -2.7% C. A) The average premium increase is $3.14 per month. Two of the plans have reduced premiums for 1997. Although Medica is increasing premiums significantly for 1997, the premiums have been unchanged since 1994. The city’s mileage reimbuiocment rate has been tied to the IRS mileage reimbursement rate. The IRS rate has increased from $.30/mile to $.31/mile. Council Action Requested: Motion to adopt a resolution to approve the 1997 non-union pay plan adjustments as follows: a 3.0% pay increase, and a mileage reimbursement rate of $.31/mile. Ayes_, Nays_. RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION CITY EMPLOYEES FOR 1997 WHEREAS, the City Administrator is responsible for annually presenting a pay schedule for city employees, with the exception of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has presented the City Council with said pay schedule for calendar and budget year 1997, which pay schedule is attached hereto and hereby made a part of this resolution; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been appropriated in the proposed 1997 Annual Budget to fund the recommended pay schedule and such other matters of compensation as herein specified. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Orono City Council as follows: 1. 2. 3. That the 1997 employee pay schedule, reflecti. 3.00% pay adjustment, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is approve That the city ’s contribution towaro (H- cost of employee health insurance remain at a maximum of $313.50 per m* ith. That city employees using their own vehicles for approved work related business shall be compensated at the rate of $.31C per mile. Adopted by the Council this 25th day of November, 1996. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Halli.., City Clerk City of Orono Compensation Plan Position / Point Groupings For 1997 >uping Point Range Mid Point Position in Grouping 1 44 - 47 45.5 Community Service Officer 2 48 - 51 49*:Laborer, Clerical I 3 52-55 53.5 Clerical II 4 56 - 59 57.5 Police Secretary, Secretary, Deputy Clerk / Secretary 5 60 - 64 62 Public Works Maintenance 6 65 - 68 66.5 Patrol Officer, On-Site Septic Manager (E), 7 69 - 73 71 City Clerk (E), Golf Course Supervisor (E), Building Inspector 8 74 - 78 76 Assistant Finance Director (E), Accountant / Management Analyst (E) 9 79 - 83 81 Asst. Zoning Administrator (E), Building Official (E) 10 84-88 86 Police Lieutenant (E), Public Works Supervisor II (E) 11 89 - 100 95 Building / Zoning Administrator (E), Public Works Director (E) 12 101 - 110 105 Police Chief (E), Finance Director (E) 13 111 - 124 117.5 City Administrator (E) (E) - Exempt REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION C^ry. DATE: November 20,). 19% ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Ttem Description: Saga Hill Park Access Alternatives Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator's Report Attachments: 1. 2. 3. Map showing private properties needing vehicular access Map show ing recommended park access options Map showing options for mitigating the impact of Garden Lane R-O-W Three types of access have been discussed in relation to the Saga Hill park area. These are; pedestrian park access, vehicular park access, and general access. The four main alternatives for achieving access to the park area are as follows: 1. Easement through the Fairview Church property. 2. Easement through the Valek property. 3. Use of Garden Lane right-of-way. 4. Acquire an access through a residential lot fronting on County Road 19. A memo previously provided to the Council discussing various access alternatives is attached. Although the determination of preferred park access alternatives is relatively straight forward, the determination of vehicular access is more complicated because it is closely related to the issue of providing access to privately owned parcels adjacent to the park land. Park Access A. Interim Access. Staff recommends the city pursue an agreement witli Fairview Church for a pedestrian access easement to the park area including the use of the church parking lot. The benefits of this alternative are as follows: 1.It would utilize a parcel currently used for open space and informal recreational activities. 2.The use of the church parking lot by park users would minimize parking on the street and would eliminate the need for the city to construct a parking lot, at least for an interim period. Request for Council Action Continued page 2 of 3 November 20, 1996 Saga Hill Park Access Alternatives B The church has indicated the easement would be pro' ided on an interim basis for a specified perivxl of time to be negotiated or until an active recreational use is developed on the park land. Because there are no plans at this time to develop active recreational uses on the park land, this interim access could potentially continue for a substantial period of lime. Long Term Access. Use of Garden Lane right-of-way to the southern portion of the recently acquired natural area property. The Garden Lane right-of-way alternative can provide three levels of access depending on the level of activity in the park area. 1. Pedestrian access. There is currently a trail on the Garden Lane right-of-way that provides access to and through the natural area. This trail could be extended to the west through the southern portion of the namral area into the park area. 2. Small scale vehicular park access. A roadway or driveway could be developed on the current Garden Lane right-of-way to the natural area. A small parking area could be developed either on the Garden Lane right-of-way or on the natural area land. 3. Larger scale vehicular park access. If higher intensity active use was developed on the park area, a roadway or driveway could be developed along Garden Lane right-of-w ay and through the southern portion of the natural area to a parking lot in the active park area. Garden Lane Right-of-Wav Issues The issue of vehicular park access is closely related to the issue of providing access to privately owned parcels that are contiguous to the platted Garden Lane right-of-way. The attached map shows that there are six undeveloped parcels that would use Garden Lane for access. At least three of these parcels (parcels 1, 2 and 3) do not have any other access alternatives. Without the Garden Lane right-of-way they would be land locked. Two parcels to the north (parcels 4 and 5) have the potential of access from the north but this would be very difficult and very expensive to achieve. The property owners would probably take the position that there is no other practical alternative to Garden Lane for access to the parcels. From a legal standpoint, the city can vacate unneeded right-of-way or relocate public right-of- way. However, the city can not vacate right-of-way if it would create land locked parcels (without compensation to the property owners). The southerly portion of Garden Lane could serve parcels 1 and 2 without affecting public park or open space or natural features. It could also serve as access to the public open space and Request for Council Action Continued page 3 of 3 November 20, 1996 Saga Hill Park Access Alternatives park land area w'ith miniiiuil impact on the open space area. However, the middle segment of Garden Lane is contiguous to the natural area on one side and contiguous to a large ravine on the other side. The northei i> segment of Garden Lane cuts through the natural area. If Garden Lane is to serve parcels 3. 4 and 5 the roadway would have an impact on the ravine and the natural area. It may be possible to eliminate the need to construct a roadway or driveway on the Garden Lane right-of-way through the nature area to serve the private parcels. This would require eliminating the need to serve parcel #3 as a buildable lot and providing an alternative method of access for parcels #4 and 5. Based on discussions with representatives of the owners of parcels #2, 4 and 5, there may be some potential to eliminate the need to serve parcel #3 as a buildable lot. One option put forward by the property owners' representative was for the city to exchange the eastern most parcel of the natural area, with access onto Wildhurst, (parcel A) for parcel #3 which would become part of the natural area. Two potential options for eliminating the need to construct a roadway on the current Garden Lane right-of-way through the northern portion of the natural area are as follows: 1. Relocate Garden Lane right-of-w'ay through the south end of the natural area into the park area then north along the boundary of the park area and the natural area. This would move the right-of-way out of the more passively used natural area and into the potentially more actively used park area. 2. Provide access to parcels and 5, and possibly 6, by a driveway through the 4 acre parcel adjacent to the llighvicw Lane right-of-way fronting on County Road 19. Staff has not approached the property owner regarding this alternative at this point. Garden Lane Ri£ht-of-Wav Issues Requirin2 Council Direction Prior to proccedii\g regarding the Garden Lane right-of-way, staff needs direction regarding the Council ’s interest in preserving tlie natural area from the impacts of constructing a roadway along the current Garden Lane right-of-way. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. 2. Motion to authorize staff to move ahead with discussions with the Fairview Church regarding an easement and use of the church parking lot. Motion to authoriz.e staff to pursue options for preserving the natural area from impacts that would be caused by a roadway constructed on the current Garden Lane right-of-way. 0 2CC> HOO I I I Private Properties Needing Vehicular Access I .\^^\i/i\ Mfc^i Park Area (Tax forfeit parcel) Natural Area Park Access Options Park Area (Tax forfeit parcel) Natural Area Options for Mitigating Impact of Garden Lane R.O.W. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator October 7, 1996 SUBJECT: Saga Hill Park Access Alternatives There are three types of access that ^ ve been discussed in relation to the Saga Hill (9.5 acre tax forfeit parcel) park area. The three types of access are pedestrian park access, vehicular park access, and general access. A listing and evaluation of the access alternatives is included below. A number of the access alternatives involve the use of the currently unimproved Garden Lane right-of-way. The Garden Lane right-of-way is unique as an access alternative because it will be used for general access regardless of whether it is selected as a park access. The following is information regarding the Garden Lane right-of-way. Garden Lane Ri£ht-of-Wav The issue of vehicular park access is closely related to the issue of providing access to privately owned parcels that are contiguous to the platted Garden Lane right-of-way. The attached map shows that there are six undeveloped parcels that would ust Garden Lane for access. At least three of these parcels (parcels 1, 2 and 3) do not have any other acc'^ss alternatives. Without the Garden Lane right-of-way they would be land locked. Two parcels to the north (parcels 4 and 5) have the potential of access from the north but this would be very difficult and very expensive to achieve. The property owners would probably take the position that there is no other practical alternative to Garden Lane for access to the parcels. From a legal standpoint, the city can vacate unneeded right-of-way or relocate public right-of- way. However, the city can not vacate right-of-way if it would create land locked parcels (without compensation to the property owners). The southerly portion of Garden Lane could serve parcels 1 and 2 without affecting public park or open space or natural feamres. It could also serve as access to the public open space and park land area with minimal impact on the open space area. However, the middle segment of Garden Lane is contiguous to the public open space area on one side and contiguous to a large ravine on the other side. The northerly segment of Garden Lane cuts through the public open space area. If Garden Lane is to serve parcels 3, 4 and 5 the roadway would have an impact on the ravine and the public open space area. Based on discussions with real estate people involved with properties in the area, there may be some potential to eliminate the need to serve parcel #3 as a buildable lot. If this was to occur, it would be possible to relocate the Garden Lane right-of-way away from the ravine area but still enable it to serve the parcels #4, 5 and 6 to the north. One option for doing this would be to locate the right-of-way through the southern end of the open space area and then north along the eastern cage of the tax forfeit parcel. This ^voulcl move the right-of-way out of the open space parcel, which is planned to be a more natural area, and on to the tax forfeit parcel. SAGA HILL PARK AREA ACCESS OPTIONS The pedestrian park access options are as follows: lA. IB. Fairview Church properry The Valek property 1. current easement IC. ID. 2. relocated easement Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the recently purchased open space area To and through the northern portion of the Sollner property (parcel #2) Vehicular park access options are as follows: IIA. IIB. lie. IID. HE. Fairview Church property 1. church parking lot 2. access across church property Valek property Garden Lane right-of-way to the open space property Garden Lane right of-way to and through the open space property Garden Lane right-of-w'ay to and through the Sollner property Vehicular general access options are as follows: IlIA. IIIB. me. IIID. lllE. Valek property Garden Lane right-of-way to the southerly portion of the open space parcel and through the open space parcel lO the tax forfeit parcel. This would require mitigating the loss of the open space property by providing additional park land to the DNR. Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the northerly portion of the Sollner parcel. This would require the acquisition ol the northerly 50 feet of the Sollner parcel as public right-of-way for a potential future public roadway. Garden Lane right-of-way to Highview Lane right-of-way and west to the tax forfeit property Acquire an access through a current residential lot fronting on County Road 19. Evaluation of Access Options. The following is an outline of the pros and cons of the alternatives for each of the three types of access to the 9.5 acre open space parcel. Sage Hill Park Access Alternatives Continued I.Pedestrian access A. Frirview Church 1. Pros a. ) Includes the ability to use the church parking lot for off-street parking b. ) Would be a natural entrance point for non-neighborhood people c. ) Utilizes a parcel currently used for open space and informal lecreationai activities. 2. Cons a. ) Based on the church’s initial proposal this would not be a permanent easement. It would be of limited duration based on a number of factors. b. ) The church’s initial proposal would allow use of the right-of-way only by walkers. We would need to broaden this to include bikers and other types of users. B. l. The current easement on the Valek property 1. Pros a. ) There is an existing alley right-of-way through the Valek property to the open space property. b. ) TTie access to the park would be relatively short. 2. Cons a. ) The Valek ’s have indicated their opposition to the use of the easement for access to the park. b. ) The current easement is very close to the Valek house and is currently on a main portion of the Valek driveway. c. ) There is no off-street parking close to this location. B. 2. A 20 foot wide easement on the western border of the Valek property 1. Pros a. ) The trail could be separated a substantial distance from adjacent homes. b. ) Would provide a short access to the park. 2. C-ons a. ) The Valek ’s have indicated their opposition. This would probably require a condemnation process. b. ) There would not be off-street parking near this access point. C. Garden lane right-of-way to and through the recently acquired open space area. 1. Pros a.) Uses an existing right-of-way 2. Cons Sage Hill Park Access Alternatives Continued a.) The Garden Lane right-of-way may be used as access to several private lots in the future. The pedestrian trail would have to be separated from the driveway/roadway. D, Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the Sollner property (parcel 2) 1. Pros a.) Uses existing right-of-way for most of its length. 2. Cons a.) Would require acquisition of an easement through the Sollner property, n. Vehicular park access A.l. Fairview Church - using the church parking lot (expanded ?) and a pedestrian access from the lot to the park. 1. Pros a. ) Does not affect existing residential property. b. ) Provides for off-street parking. c. ) Eliminates the need for what would be a secluded parking lot on the park property which can generate enforcement problems. 2. Cons a. ) Fairview Church has not indicated a willingness to expand the existing parking lot. b. ) The parking area would be a substantial distance from the park itself. A. 2. Fairview Church - vehicular access across the church property into the park. 1. Pros a.) Would enable the creation of an access that would not affect adjacent residential development or unique natural features. 2. Cons a. ) Fairview Church is in opposition to vehicular access. b. ) Would create a secluded parking area in the park. B. Vehicular access through the Valek property. 1. Pros a.) Requires a relatively short roadway into the park. 2. Cons a. ) Would require the construction of a parking area in the park. b. ) Would create a secluded parking area in the park. c. ) The Valeks are in opposition to this alternative. r Sage Hill Park Access Alternatives Continued C.Garden Lane right-of-way to the recently purchased open space property. 1 . Pros a.) Uses existing right-of-way 2. Cons a. ) Requires the construction of a parking lot b. ) Requires DNR approval of the parking lot to serve general park use. c. ) Would create a secluded parking area. D.Garden Lane right-of-way to the open space property and through the open space property to the park property (tax forfeit parcel). 1 . Pros a. ) Uses existing right-of-way. b. ) Provides access to the tax forfeit park parcel. 2. Cons a. ) Requires construction of a parking lot. b. ) Requires DNR approval of a driveway/roadway through the open space property to the tax forfeit park property. c. ) Could require mitigation of the use of the newly acquired open space property as called for in the DNR grant. This could be accomplished by vacating a northerly portion of the Garden Lane right-of-way. d. ) Would create a secluded parking lot. e. ) Would be a relatively long roadway. E.Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the Sollner property (parcel 2). 1 . Pros a.) Uses existing right-of-way for most of its length. 2. Cons a.) Requires acquisition of an easement over a portion of parcel #2. III. Provision of potential future general vehicular access to the tax forfeit park parcel. A.Roadway easement through the Valek property. 1. Pros a. ) Distance to the tax forfeit park parcel is relatively short. b. ) An alley easement currently exists on the Valek property. Cons a. ) The Valeks are very much opposed to vehicular access through their property. b. ) The city code requires that roadway right-of-way be 50 feet in width. The current alleyway is 10 feet wide. 2. Sage Hill Park Access Alternatives Continued B. Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the southerly portion of the newly acquired open space property. 1. Pros a.) Uses existing right-of-way. 2. Cons a.) Would require mitigation of the loss of 50 feet of the recently acquired open space property for the road right-of-way as called for the DNR grant agreement. This could be accomplished by vacating a portion of Garden Lane right-of-way adjacent to the open space property to the north. C. Garden Lane right-of-way to and through the northern portion of the Sollner property. This would require the acquisition of 50 feet of right-of-way from the northerly portion of the Sollner property. 1. Pros a. ) Uses existing right-of-way for the majority of the access required. b. ) Does not disnirb the open space property. 2. Cons a.) May be difficult/expensive to acquire the 50 foot right-of-way from the Sollners. D. Use of Garden Lane right-of-way to Highview right-of-way to the northern portion of the tax forfeit park parcel. 1. Pros a.) Uses existing right-of-way. 2. Cons a. ) Requires a very long right-of-way to obtain access to the tax forfeit park parcel. b. ) Would require the construction of a roadway adjacent to the recently acquired open space property and through the open space property where the right-of-way splits the open space property to the north. c. ) The right-of-way and roadway would separate the open space property from the deep ravine to the southeast of the open space property. E. Access through a residential parcel from County Road 19. 1. Pros a.) Would be a relatively short access. 2. Cons a.) Most of the residential lots are relatively narrow along County Road 19. It would be difficult to put a roadway through those lots. • • • Sage Hill Park Access Alternatives Continued b.) The more northerly lot is larger but also is on a septic system ■N '// 'O^C ''^<V til • > / ^\n' \ '••II I uirAi^ T}kh' •• • Xn) j , »0P* f «m'»■ ••II I \ —r ••II« .1^ / • ••I I ••I* • - IA iiW^•¥ • n ••<•.1 • •M I / II)* \ym( IB 2 IB-1 ••tit Solln • •!• t 7 / • •!• I N t ••i> I ••ir.i L'« I • •M.^ tnfV / Pedestrian Access Options Vehicular Park Access Options Vehicular General Access Options 200 ifoO Private Properties Needing Vehicular Access “^"■meeting NOV 2 5 J9gg REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: NovemberSSPfSJ^P ITEM NO: / Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse Administrator’s Report Title City Administrator Item Description: Financial Management Policies / Staff has developed an initial set of financial management policies to provide the necessary guidelines to ensure the city’s financial resources are effectively managed. The policies are very straight forward and reflect procedures currently in place. Staff recommends these policies be formally adopted by the Council to ensure they continue to guide the actions of both Council and staff for the most effective management of the city’s financial resources. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached set of city of Orono Financial Management Policies r 1 City of Orono Financial Management Policies Overview The City of Orono has developed financial management policies to provide the necessary guidelines to effectively manage the City’s financial resources. These policies are reviewed as part of the financial planning process, and arc used as the basis for developing all procedures involving the financial activities of the City. Effective financial management requires the City to comply with the following policies. Operating Budget Policies The City will prepare its General Fund budget to provide 100% funding for all budgeted operating expenditures with operating revenues. The City will avoid budgetaiy' procedures that balance current expenditures at the expense of meeting future year's expenses. The budget w ill provide for adequate maintenance of the capital plant and equipment, and for their orderly replacement. The City will maintain budgetaiy controls through the review of periodic financial reports to determine whether spending levels are within established parameter. The City maintains a general purchasing policy which provides additional controls of expenditures on a day-to-day basis. The City will prepare its operating budget in a manner consistent with changing economic conditions. Revenue Policies The City will establish user fees and charges at a level sufficient to cover the costs of providing the applicable serv ice. In the case of the Enterprise Funds, a portion of the user fees will be used to cover the costs of future infrastructure replacement. The City will revise user fees on an annual basis to reflect the costs of providing services. Capital Improvement Policies Beginning in 1997, the City will develop and maintain a multi-year Capital Improvement Plan, effective for budget years beginning in 1998. Pending completion of the Capital Improvement Plan, the City will coordinate all capital improvements with the Plan, and will establish an annual capital improvement budget. The estimated costs and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal will be identified before the Plan is submitted to the City Council. Capital Improvement Policies - continued The City will provide ongoing preventive maintenance on all assets at a level sufficient to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. Debt Management Policies The City will confine long-tem. borrowing to capital improvements or projects that cannot be funded from operating revenues and/or a reasonable amount of existing reserves. When the City finances capital projects by issuing bonds, it will pay back the bonds within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project. The City will attempt to limit the long-term obligation of any project to no more than 15 years. Tlie City will not incur long-term debt to support current operations. When possible, the City will take advantage of bond call features and the opportunity to reduce overall interest obligations through bond refunding procedures. As required by Minnesota State Statutes, the City's total legal debt margin will not exceed two percent of the market value of taxable property. Reserve Policies The City will maintain total General Fund Reserves, less funds designated for vested vacation and severance benefits, sufficient to cover general operation expenditures for a period of at least 125 days (35% of the General Fund Operating Budget). A reserve within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund will be maintained to provide for catastrophie events or temporaiy ’ funding in the form of short-term loans to other funds. The City will maintain an equipment reserve fund, and will appropriate funds to it on an annual basis to provide for the timely replacement of equipment. The City will maintain a building reserve fund, to offset the costs related to future new construction, additions, or significant improvements to City facilities. Investment Policies The City will maintain cash resei^es sufficient to cover near or short-term obligations. All idle funds will be invested in accordance with the City's Investment Policy, and as approved under Minnesota Law. The City will conduct periodic market analysis to maximize yield without undue risk. As permitted, the City will pool cash from all funds for investment purposes. The City w ill maintain and review arrangements with financial institutions on a periodic basis to determine reasonable fees for seiv'ices. Accounting. Auditing, and Financial Reporting Policies The City will maintain an accounting and financial reporting system that conforms with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), outlined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), and Minnesota state law\ The City will prepare a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) each fiscal year in accordance with GAAP, and criteria established by the Government Finance Officer's Association (GFOA). «*n independent audit will be performed each year by a certified public accounting fimi, or the State . '.aditor, who will issue an official opinion on the City's financial statements. The accounting system will provide financial reports that help management to monitor all financial activity of the City. r- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION f^OV 2 DATE: Nove 19SS 6 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Adminis^ator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: / Donation by Long Lake State Bank to Orono Police Department A memo from Police Chief Gary Cheswick regarding a donation by the Long Lake State Bank to the Orono Police Department is attached. The donation is for the purchase of a device to assist in bringing high speed chases to an end more quickly and safely. Staff recommends approval of the donation. COU’NCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the donation of four sets of "stop sticks" with an approximate value of $1,200.00 by Long Lake State Bank to the Orono Police Department and to acknowledge Long Lake State Bank for its ongoing support of the Orono Police Department. r Date:November 14, 1996 To:Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator From: Gary Chesvvick, Chief of Police Subject: "Stop Sticks" As you recall, we had the opportunity to review a video tape of a product available to help police in the apprehension of persons involved in high speed chases. This device, carried in the squad car, is equipped with spikes in an enclosed case that can be deployed by an officer to stop a vehicle being chased. The benefits of this device are many including minimizing physical damage as well as lessening liability. On 11/13/96,1 attended a meeting wdth members of the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition, where these devices were discussed. On 11/14/96,1 was contacted by the Long Lake State Bank President Mike Byrnes who told me the bank would like to purchase four (4) sets of the "Slop Sticks" for the police department. The approximate donation value would be around $1200. If allow ed, 1 would like to accept this donation for police department use. L 'C/^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '^Ot, ^ DATE: November 20. ITEM NO = Department Approval: ^ Name Tom Kuehn Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Title Finance Director Report Item Description: Recertification of Otten Brothers Assessment - Resolution Attachment: Resolution to Amend the Assessment ibr Improvement of Willow Drive from the Intersection of Trunk Highway 12 to 650 Feet North on Willow Drive The City Council held a hearing regarding the Willow Drive reconstruction project assessments at a regular council meeting on November 27, 1995. At the conclusion of the hearing the assessment roll was adopted as presented. Mr Otten subsequently filed an appeal of the $19,348.30 originally assessed to his property, (PID 34-118-23 22 0014). A proposed settlement agreement between the Ottens and the City was presented and approved at the November 12, 1996 council meeting. The agreement stipulates: (1) The original assessment be reduced from $19,348.30 to $12,500.00. (2) That credit be applied for the portion of the 1996 installment already paid which exceeds the amount that would have been due if the original assessment were $12,500.00. (3) The amended or modified assessment be recertified and spread over the remaining 14 years commencing with the installment due in 1997. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of Resolution to Amend the Assessment for Improvement of Willow Drive from the Intersection of Trunk Highway 12 to 650 Feet North on Willow Drive PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by., seconded by,, to adopt Resolution #...... Amending the Assessment for the Improvement of Willow Drive from the Intersection of Trunk Highway 12 to 650 Feet North on Willow Drive. Ayes___, Nays 1 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE INTERSECTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 AND 650 FEET NORTH ON WILLOW DRIVE WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3642, adopted November 27, 1995, established the assessments to be levied on the above referenced project for the Otten property, identified as PID 34-118-23-22-0014, in the amount of $19,348.30, and WHEREAS, the Otten<; subsequently commenced an action against the City contesting the amount of ine assessment, and WHEREAS, the City and Ottens have agreed to settle the action by reducing the assessment from $19,348.30 to $12,500.00, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the orif^inal assessment, identified on Hennepin County records as levy number 13628, on the Otten parcel be reduced from $19,348.30 to $12,500.00, and that a reduction of $833.33 be credited for the principal installment paid in 1996 on the amended assessment, and that a further reduction of $938.79 be credited for the portion of the installment paid in 1996 by the Ottens which exceeds the amount that would have been due and payable under the reduced assessment, and that the assessment remaining after said reductions shall be respread over the remaining 14 year commencing with the installment due in 1997, at the original interest rate of 6.50%. Adopted by the Council this 25th day of November, 1996. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ‘V ^5 % DATE: November 19, ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Pi Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Appointment of Greg Gappa to the Public Services Director Position The selection process for the city ’s Public Services Director position is now complete. The Council has had an opportunity to meet the top candidate, Greg Gappa, and has authorized the City Administrator to offer the position to Mr. Gappa. Mr. Gappa has accepted the city ’s offer and is available to start on December 2, 1996. The last step in the hiring process is for the Council to formally approve the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint Greg Gappa to the position of Public Services Director effective December 2, 1996 at a starting salary of $50,844; and providing for quarterly performance reviews, and a 2.5% salary increase at 6 months if merited by the level of performance. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION "0^ ^ 5 iS96 C/7Vop^f^ONO Date: November 21, 1996 Item No: / H Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name: Gar>^ Cheswick Title: Chief of Police Agenda Section: 1 Item Description; Letter of Intent to purchase - 1997 Ford Crown Victoria Exhibits:None DISCUSSION I am requesting approval to send a letter to Superior Ford for intent to purchase two (2) 1997 Ford Crown Victoria squad cars. These two vehicle's are budgeted for and are to replace two old cars; squad #169 with milage of 123,000 miles and squad #171 with 97,500 miles (as of 11/20/96). Cost per car is $19,915.00. This request for intent to purchase is due to the restrictive number of vehicles being built. Ford Motor Company, the only manufacturer of rear wheel drive squad cars, will have difficulty meeting the increased demand. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of letter to be send to Superior Ford. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION nov eg ^99$ DATE: November 25, 1996 ITEM NO,'0. f ^ Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name: Tom Kuehn Title: Finance Director * Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Certification of Delinquent Utilities Attachments:A. Resolution providing for collection of delinquent sewer, water, septic inspection fees, and recycling program fees B. Assessment roll. Each year the city certifies to the county, all unpaid annual service charges for the septic inspection program fees, the annual recycling program fee, and all delinquent sewer and water accounts of $50.00 or more, to be collected with the following year's taxes. In addition to the outstanding amounts delinquent, the citv adds eight j>ercent (8%) interest to all accounts, and an administrative fee to the septic accounts. At this time the total to be assessed is $71.603.43. including administrative fees. This amount will be decreased by any pre-payments received up to the final payment dated of November 27, 1996. A copy of the assessment is attached for your review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council direct and authorize the County Auditor to assess properties for delinquent utilities PROPOSED MOTION:Moved by ,seconded by , to adopt Resolution #, providing for the collection of delinquent charges for 1996 sewer and water utility services, and fees for the annual septic inspection and recycling programs. Ayes___, Nays A RESOLUTION FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT 1995 SEWER AND WATER UTILITY SERVICE CHARGES, RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES, AND ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT (SEPTIC) INSPECTION PROGRAM Whereas, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota has enacted certain ordinances under Minnesota Statutes, therefore pursuant to Chapter 3 and Chapter 13, Orono City Code pertaining to payment and collection of sewer and water charges and annual service charges for recycling and the Onsite Sewage Treatment (septic) inspection program, and the charges identified in the attached list of properties are delinquent in nature, and; Whereas, the City has obtained from the Hennepin County Auditor, levy number 13882 for the delinquent accounts, and. Whereas, the City hereby authorizes and directs the Hennepin County Auditor to extend upon the property tax lists of the County and further collect said assessments thereon provided by law, and; Whereas, the City hereby authorizes and directs the Hennepin County Auditor to add eight percent (8%) interest, as directed, to all amounts due. Therefore Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota hereby authorizes and directs the County Auditor of Hennepin County to assess properties identified in the attached list, made a part hereof, for the amounts of delinquent utilities/fees appearing along with such properties, plus eight percent (8%) interest added as directed. Said amounts to be collected ^ong with property taxes collected in 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on November 25, 1996. Edward J. Callahan Jr., Mayor attest; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk RESOLUTION # STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I, Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on November 25, 1996, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. day of In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ______________^.19____ Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk (SEAL) LEVY PROPERTY NUMBER IDENTIFICATI ON # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 02-117-23-21-CX)19 02-117-23-24-0003 02-117-23-31-0011 02-117-23-31-0014 02-117-23-31-0019 02- 117-23-43-0026 03- 117-23-13-0006 03-117-23-21-0015 03-117-23-33-0002 03-117-23-33-0004 03- 117- 23-34-0015 04- 117-23-11-0008 04-117- 23-11-0011 04-117- 23-12-0008 04-117-23-12-0013 04-117-23-13-0001 04-117-23-21-0009 04-117- 23-22-0003 04-117-23-22-0003 04-117-23-23-0010 04-117-23-23-0021 04-117-23-23-0029 04-117-23-31-0012 04-117-23-42-0018 04-117-23-43-0002 04-117-23-43-0007 42840 41640 42560 42560 42560 42760 42270 00360 43570 43570 43570 02550 02550 05343 05343 41500 41520 41520 41520 41520 00954 05343 04430 43174 41500 41500 82.00 82.00 340.38 264.98 264.98 340.38 71.20 82.00 71.20 82.00 71.20 71.20 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 50.00 123.96 89.13 167.52 82.00 82.00 82.00 71.20 82.00 002 002 001 003 008 001 001 001 005 002 001 001 030 001 007 001 025 026 013 014 014 001 001 001 001 002 001 003 001 002 001 004 003 170 Smith Ave 280 Orono Orchard Rd S 570 Orono Orchard Rd S 521 Hanlon Ave 1340 Fox St 1165 Ferndale Rd W 1945 Fox Ridge Rd 2150 Colin Dr 2325 Fox St 2275 Webber Hills Rd 2060 Webber Hills Rd 130 Manor Cir 2565 Countryside Dr 2645 Watertown Rd 2670 Countryside Dr 340 Old Crystal Bay Rd S 3025 Watertown Rd 3195 Watertown Rd 3195 Watertown Rd 400 Leaf St 3180 Ridgewood Cir 3020 Somerset La 460 Sussex La 2760 White Oak Cir 2765 Fox St 790 Old Crystal Bay Rd S 13882 04-117-23-43-0021 04349 82.00 003 001 730 Gander Rd 13882 05-117-23-12-0001 41440 82.00 003 ■— —3445 High La 13882 05-117-23-13-0039 41900 219.86 002 008 3435 Eastlake St 13882 05-117-23-13-0040 41900 340.38 002 008 3415 Eastlake St 13882 05-117-23-14-0024 41900 60.76 007 002 285 Crestview Ave 13882 05-117-23-14-0030 41900 100.76 —005 315 Crestview Ave 1388i 05-117-23-14-0031 41900 340.38 —005 325 Crestview Ave 13882 05-117-23-14-0035 41900 264.98 009 005 3382 Bayside Rd 13882 05-117-23-23-0014 42320 340.38 007 001 348 Westlake St 13882 05-117-23-23-0029 42320 340.38 018 002 365 Westlake St 13882 05-117-23-23-0040 42320 167.52 ——309 Westlake St 13882 05-117-23-24-0101 42860 126.76 002 — —3770 Bayside Rd LEVY PROPERTY NUMBER IDENTIRCATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 06-117- 06-117- 06-117- 06-117- 06-117- 06-117- 06-117- 06- 117- 07- 117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07-117- 07- 117- 08- 117- 08-117- 08-117- 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 23-1A- 23-21- 23-21- 23-22- 23-22- 23-31- 23-41- 23-43- 23-12- 23-14- 23-14- 23-21- 23-22- 23-22- 23-23- 23-31- -23-31- 23-32- -23-33- 23-34- -23-41- -23-41- -23-42- -23-44- -23-44- -23-44- -23-44- -23-44- -23-13 -23-23 -23-33 -23-33 -23-33 -23-34 -23-34 -23-34 -23-41 -23-41 0020 0003 0006 0003 0009 0001 0099 0012 0019 0018 0033 0013 0012 0016 0002 0004 0023 0030 0010 0003 0030 0054 0007 0011 0020 -0021 -0026 -0062 -0013 -0005 -0021 -0066 -0075 -0008 -0009 -0053 -0002 14III 43094 41306 05194 41306 05490 43119 42620 00641 42230 42440 43240 42700 C2927 03487 41307 41940 43080 43080 43360 41940 43120 43120 43091 42300 42300 42300 42300 42300 41480 42460 42180 42280 42280 41600 41600 42200 41308 41308 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 340.38 340.38 251.56 89.13 340.38 338.68 82.00 82.00 100.76 164.05 220.38 340.38 100.76 340.38 239.58 340.38 189.58 178.26 340.38 340.38 340.38 340.38 340.38 340.38 89.13 302.15 340.38 340.38 178.26 523.06 340.38 307.57 001 001 001 001 006 oil 025 001 001 021 013 024 025 032 004 017 008 009 005 001 001 007 002 004 001 001 007 008 005 405 Tonkawa Rd 4485 Bayside Rd 4465 Bayside Rd 180 North Shore Dr W 4645 Bayside Rd 420 North Arm Dr 550 Park La 645 North Arm Dr 945 Forest Arms La 1055 North Arm Dr 1180 Elmwood Ave 1001 WildhurstTr 900 North Shore Dr W 4701 West Branch Rd 1060 North Shore Dr W 4485/7North Shore Dr 1348 Rest R Cir 1310 Rest R La 1405 RestRRd 4425 North Shore Dr 1305 Elmwood Ave 1268 North Arm Dr 1375 Vine R 4091 Highwood Rd 4167 Highwood Rd 4175 Highwood Rd 4174 Highwood Rd 4056 North Shore Dr 1040 Tonkawa Rd 1056 Loma Linda Ave 1415 Cherry PI 1545 Minnie Ave 1540 North Arm Dr 3635 North Shore Dr 3625 North Shore Dr 3683 North Shore Dr 3210 North Shore Dr 3220 North Shore Dr LEVY NUMBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13882 08-117-23-41-0004 41308 82.80 — —— —3224 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117-25-41-0005 41308 82.60 ——3222 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117-23-41-0006 41308 82.80 ——3250 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117- 23-41-0007 41308 340.38 ——3260 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117- 23-41-0009 41308 340.38 ——3268 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117- 23 -41-0012 41308 1,163.90 ——3324 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117- 23-43 -0009 41860 89.13 003 002 3520 North Shore Dr 13882 08-117-23-44-0008 42005 340.38 003 001 3260 Bohns Pt La 13882 09-117- 23-41-0004 41309 189.58 ——2565 North Shore Dr 13882 10-117-23-13-0004 42265 62.00 004 001 1150 Heritage La 13882 10-117-23-23-0001 02558 82.00 001 001 1205 French Creek Dr 13882 10-117-23-24-0002 41310 82.00 ——1045 Brown Rd S 13882 10-117- 23-31 -0007 41310 340.38 — ——1360 Railroad Ave 13882 10-117- 23 -31-0016 41310 340.38 ——2150 Prospect Ave 13882 10-117-23-31-0022 42140 340.38 001 001 1251 Brown RdS 13882 10-117- 23-31-0048 42520 340.38 004 001 1375 Brown Rd S 13882 10-117- 23-31-0050 42520 340.38 005 001 1395 Brown Rd S 13882 10-117- 23 -31-0053 42520 89.13 —002 1380 Briar 3t 13882 10-117-23-31-0069 42540 89.13 — —001 1230 Arbor St 13882 10-117-23-31-0072 42540 340.38 —002 1245 Arbor St 13882 10-117-23-31-0075 42540 89.13 —002 1212 Briar St 13882 10-117-23-31-0098 42520 315.89 —003 2180 North Shore Dr 13882 10-117-23-33-0001 41310 82.00 ——2385 North Shore Dr 13882 10-117-23-34-0003 43072 82.00 ——1449 Bay Ridge Rd 13882 10-117-23-34-0005 43072 82.00 ——1473 Bay Ridge Rd 13882 10-117-23-34-0017 43072 71.20 ——1425 Bay Ridge Rd 13882 10-117-23-42-0012 42780 164.05 ——1950 Shoreline Dr 13882 10-117-23-42-0016 43066 82.00 ——1920 Shoreline Dr 13882 11-117-23-23-0008 43340 82.00 ——1491 Shoreline Dr 13882 17-117-23-22-0028 42060 426.01 ——1750 Concordia St 13882 17-117-23-22-0029 42060 431.22 ——1755 Fagerness R Rd 13882 17-117-23-23-0017 42225 489.87 001 001 1940 Concordia St 13882 17-117-23-23-0019 42510 431.22 002 001 1825 Fagerness R Rd 13882 17-117-23-31-0017 43111 464.55 ——3725 Togo Rd 13882 17-117-23-31-0030 42420 482.40 004 010 3660 Togo Rd 13882 17-117-23-31-0040 42420 328.74 010 010 3765 Togo Rd 13882 17-117-23-31-0041 43620 702.81 030 001 2100 Shadywood Rd 13882 17-117-23-34-0023 01777 702.89 001 001 2255 Blaine Ave LEVY PROPERTY NUMBER IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117- 17-117 17-117- 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17- 117 18- 117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 23-34- 23-34- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41- 23-41 - 23-42- 23-43 23 -43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43 23-43- 23-43- 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-14 -23-11 -23-11 -23-12 23-12 -23-12 -23-21 0026 0034 0003 0004 0004 0009 0011 0021 0023 0028 0021 0011 0016 0044 0056 0064 0069 0074 0076 0087 0095 0088 0104 0118 0022 0029 0033 0058 0083 0096 0108 0005 14 14 0014 0015 0046 0020 •Iflt • •If 01777 01777 43040 43040 43040 42420 42420 43540 43540 43540 01398 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 42740 43620 43540 43540 43540 43540 43540 43540 43540 42220 41390 41390 42720 42720 00719 42420 566.50 583.91 518.18 453.97 469.81 618.92 717.04 458.56 463.41 454.97 558.52 519.58 551.99 591 50 352.30 120.51 343.09 399.00 666.18 526.03 471.75 1,928.48 802 75 236.97 464.22 452.41 563.27 522.45 771.34 531.47 1.064.85 "36.00 637.69 612.87 585.68 476.51 687.48 615.58 LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 004 001 3600 Livingston Ave 002 002 3690 Lyric Ave —001 2150 Kenwood Way —001 2160 Kenwood Way —001 2162 Kenwood Way 001 002 3235 Crystal Bay Rd 001 002 3205 Crystal Bay Rd 008 —3339 Crystal Bay Rd 010 —3349 Crystal Bay Rd —— —2180 Kenwood Way 001 001 3601 TogoRd 008 002 3485 Crystal R —002 3472 Livingstof Ave —004 3525 Livingston Ave — —004 3536 Lyric Ave 006 005 3443 Livingston Ave oil 005 3477 Livingston Ave 018 005 3472 Lyric Ave 022 005 3444 Lyric Ave 010 006 3473 Lyric Ave 019 006 3468 Shoreline Dr —006 3412 Shoreline Dr 006 007 3551 Lyric Ave 002 001 3415 Crystal Bay Rd ——3405 Crystal Bay Rd 027 —2253 Bayview PI 031 —2305 Bayview R 064 —3220 Navarre La —— —2230 Bayview PI ——2300 Bayview PI ——2260 Bayview R 004 —1981 FagernessRP 002 001 2597 Lydiard Cir 002 001 2595 Lydiard Cir 007 002 2447 Carman St —002 2455 Carman St 003 001 2505/7KellyAve 003 007 2520 DunwoodyAve LEVY PROPERTY NUMBER IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13682 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20- 117- 21- 117- 21-117- 21-117- 21- 117- 22- 117- 22-117- 22-117- 22- 117- 23- 117- 23-117- 23-117- 23-117- 23-117 23-117 23-117 23-117 23-117 23-117 23-117 25-118 25-118 25- 118 26- 118 26-118 23-21- 23-22- 23-24 23-24- 23-24 23-31 23-31- 23-31 23-32- 23-42 23-42 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-22 23-22 23-23 23-24 23-31 23-31 23-31- 23-31 23-22 23-22 23-23 23-23 -23-23 -23-32 -23-32 -23-32 -23-32 -23-32 -23-32 -23-33 -23-43 -23-43 -23-31 -23-33 0037 0002 0013 0014 0017 0061 0063 0067 0015 0032 0033 0022 0035 0043 0008 0011 0033 0065 0010 0029 0032 0033 0009 0018 0020 0031 0033 0002 0027 0063 0065 0066 0070 0004 0011 0013 0004 0016 43490 42420 42020 42020 42020 43167 00373 42020 43300 43300 43480 43300 43640 43640 43220 43540 43530 43085 42960 42960 05046 42960 42660 42660 42660 42660 42660 42660 42660 43140 43140 42680 42660 41325 00634 00634 41326 42890 582.29 481.70 608.09 823.29 464.29 75.41 177.59 472.33 542.58 431.22 625.38 596.87 530.39 616.46 383.43 107.45 324.00 601.40 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 132.00 82.00 100.00 82.00 82.00 001 006 125 031 165 023 008 012 001 002 047 063 008 002 003 003 004 001 001 002 004 001 001 001 2480 Casco Pt Rd 3935 Shoreline Dr 2700 Ethel Ave 2705 Ethel Ave 2755 Ethel Ave 2980 Casco R Rd 2965 Casco R Rd 2868 Casco R Rd 2805 Casco R Rd 3273 Casco Cir 3532 Ivy R 3205 Casco Cir 3040 Casco R Rd 3277 Casco Cir 2530 Old Beach Rd 2570 Lydiard Ave 2700 Kelly Ave 2740 Shadywood Rd 630 Big Island 570 Big Island 620 Big Island 610 Big Island 750 Big Island 120 Big Island 160 Big Island 140 Big Island 230 Big Island 460 Big Island 300 Big Island 420 Big Island 410 Big Island 330 Big Island 450 Big Island 725 Sixth Ave N 290 Hollander Rd 260 Hollander Rd 1300 Sixth Ave N 940 Dakota Ave LEVY NUMBER PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 13882 26-118 - 23 -33-0024 42390 82.00 009 930 Dakota Ave 13882 26-118-23-33-0026 42390 82.00 012 —1590 Long Lake Blvd 13882 27-118-23-31-0005 41327 82.00 ——2135 Sixth Ave N 13882 27-118-23-32-0003 41327 82.00 — —1180 Willow Dr N 13882 27-118-23-32-0014 04518 82.00 002 001 2329 Shadowood Dr 13882 27-118-23-32-0016 04518 82.00 004 001 1115 Cox Farm Rd 13882 27-118-23-34-0006 41327 82.00 ——809 Brown Rd N 13882 27-118-23-42-0010 42470 82.00 005 001 1840 LakeviewTer 13882 27-118-23-42-0013 42740 82.00 001 002 1080 Brown Rd N 13882 27-118-23-42-0015 42470 82.00 003 002 1865 LakeviewTer 13882 27-118-23-42-0016 42470 71.20 004 002 1845 Lakeview Ter 13882 27-118- 23 -44-0009 00390 82.00 008 001 1650 North Farm Rd 13882 28-118-23-33-0014 03491 82.00 001 001 3175 Jamestown Rd 13882 29-118- 23 -44-0001 41329 82.00 ——3225 Sixth Ave N 13882 30-118-23-31-0003 41330 82.00 ——4555 Wayzata Blvd 13882 30-118-23-44-0005 03194 82.00 001 008 830 Hunt Farm Rd 13882 31-118-23-11-0004 41331 82.00 ——4185 Sixth Ave N 13882 31-118-23-12-0011 43210 82.00 006 001 4360 Sixth Ave N 13882 31-118-23-12-0018 41331 82.00 ——4380 Sixth Ave N 13882 31-118-23-21-0003 41331 82.00 — ——4580 Watertown Rd 13882 31-118-23-21-0003 41331 82.00 ——4560 Watertown Rd 13882 31-118-23-22-0008 00721 82.00 001 002 630 Deborah Dr 13882 31-118-23-24-0001 41331 82.00 ——4480 Watertown Rd 13882 31-118-23-33-0007 41331 82.00 ——4740 Bayside Rd 13882 31-118-23-34-0010 02554 82.00 008 001 80 Luce Line Ridge 13882 31-118-23-34-0012 02554 82.00 010 001 4440 Bayside Rd 13882 31-118- 23-41 -0003 41331 82.00 ——4045 Watertown Rd 13882 31-118-23-41-0005 41331 82.00 ——4085 Watertown Rd 13882 31-118-23-42-0001 41331 82.00 ——4245 Chippewa La 13882 31-118-23-42-0003 41331 77.00 ——4355 Chippewa La 13882 31-118- 23-43 -0012 04983 82.00 001 001 45 Cristofori Cir 13882 32-118-23-21-0005 41332 82.00 ——605 Stubbs Bay Rd N 13882 32-118-23-22-0007 42820 82.00 015 —740 Orchard Park Rd 13882 32-118-23-23-0003 42820 82.00 oil —500 Orchard Park Rd 13882 32-118-23-32-0001 41332 82.00 ——3940 Watertown Rd 13882 32-118-23-34-0012 41332 71.20 ——3743 Watertown Rd 13882 32-118-23-44-0009 41332 82.00 ——3405 Watertown Rd 13882 33-118-23-13-0011 43515 1,296.26 001 001 2785 Wayzata Blvd i LEVY PROPERTY NUMBER IDENTIFICATION # ADDITION CERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 13882 33-118 33-118 33-118 33-118 33-118 33-118 33-118 35-118 35- 118 36- 118 36-118 36-118 23-13 23-34 23-41 23-43 23-43 23-44 23-44 23-22 23-33 23-33 23-41 23-44 0014 0013 0014 0006 0020 0016 0019 0002 0003 0009 1 6 tlilf • ill 43515 05124 00695 03369 41333 42210 42210 41360 41335 42710 41336 41370 8.660.23 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 340.38 100.76 82.00 82.00 82.00 82.00 511.72 LOT BLOCK ADDRESS 004 001 2725 Wayzata Blvd 001 001 155 Wear La N 003 001 325 Willow Dr N 001 001 160 Old Crystal Bay Rd N ——2760 Watertown Rd 010 002 51 Hackberry Hill 013 002 2480 Wertertown Rd ——1525 Long Lake Blvd ——105 Orono Orchard Rd N 001 001 10 MyrHewood Rd ——395 North Femdale Rd 002 001 75 North Femdale Rd TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS 71,603.43 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION f^0\/^5 DATE: November ITEM NO: ' Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Item Description: Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report ■7^ 1997 Police Serv ices Contract with the Cities of Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park The cities of Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park have each approved a renewal of the police services contract with the city of Orono for 1997. The cost to Minnetonka Beach will be $64,524. This is an increase of $2,142 or 3.47% over the 19% amount. The.cost for the city of Spring Park will be $313,460. This is an increase of $8,849 or 2.96% over the 1996 amount. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the renewal of the police service contract with the cities of Minnetonka Beac* and Spring Park for 1997 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; Novemto 22 ITEM NO: ^ ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: IP, Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: y 1997 - 1999 Police Service Contract with the City of Long Lake The city of Long Lake has approved the extension of the police service contract with the city of Orono for years 1997-1999. The cost to the city of Long Lake is $239,406 for 1997. This is an increase of $5,872 or 2.54% over the 19% amount. The cost of providing police services to the city of Long Lake in 1998 and 1999 will be determined based upon the police department budget amounts in those years and the cost allocation formula with cost increases not to exceed 4% in any one year. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the police services contract with the city of Long Lake for the years 1997 1999 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract document. REQiT:ST FOR COLTNCIL ACTION ^■*0. ‘ DATE: November 22, 1996 ITEM NO:/ Department Approval: Name Dorothy Halltn Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval There are no licenses. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; r •V / 19 MOV 1996 Tue 10:01 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 52650 52650 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 20-Nov-96 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 52650 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 52651 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF U^JCES 52651 526S1 52651 20-Nov-96 20-NOV-96 20-NOV-96 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 52651 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 52652 GREAT NEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 52652 20-NOV-96 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSUR-\NCE CO Totals Check Number 52652 CaiEAT ^EST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Check Number 52653 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL 52653 20-NOV-96 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL Totals Check Number 52653 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL Check Number 52654 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL 52654 20-Nov-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL Totals Check Number 52654 HE.NNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL Check Number 52655 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 52655 20-Nov-96 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 52655 I^MA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 52656 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 52656 20-Nov-96 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 52656 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 52657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 52657 20-NOV-96 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 52657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 52658 MN MUTUAL LIFE 52658 20-NOV-96 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Number 52658 MN MUTUAL LIFE Transaction Amount 6.460.00 6.460.00 3.006.39 3.006.39 7,023.11 13.035.89 1.190.00 1.190.00 164.82 164.82 184.50 184.50 100.00 100.00 462.00 462.00 2.933.17 2.933.17 55.00 55.00 Page 1 s^omments SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED FICA li MEDICARE W/H FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H THOMTON iC0266780 SKREEN iC0262310 DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES W/H STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H 19 Nov 1996 Tue 10:01 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Qlcck Nun^ber 52659 S2659 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COM? 20-NOV-96 m STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 52659 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COM? Check Nuir±>er 52660 FEBSOO/CBRA 52660 20-NOV-96 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 52660 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 52661 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 52661 20-NOV-96 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 52661 PEBSCO/US CON? OF MAYORS Check Number 52662 PERA 52662 52662 20-NOV-96 20-NOV-96 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 52662 PERA Check Number 52663 UNITED WAY 52663 20-NOV-96 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 52663 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount 150.00 150.00 92.61 92.61 2,002.50 2,002.50 3,707.05 4,825.01 8,532.86 29.00 29.00 35,392.35 Page 2 COfrotientS DEFERRED COMP H/H OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H USCM DEFERRED COMP W/K PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H J L 21 Rov 1996 Thu 4:37 P« Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Check Number Date Name Qieck Number 52664 52664 A-1 RENTAL 15-Nov-96 A-1 RENTAL Totals Check Number 52664 A-1 RENTAL Check Number 52665 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 52665 52665 21-NOV-96 21-NOV-96 ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 52665 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Check Number 52666 ANCHOR PAPER 52666 21-Nov-96 ANCHOR PAPER Totals Check Number 52666 ANCHOR PAPER Check Number 52667 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 52667 15-Nov-96 ASPLUNDH COFFEE Totals Check Number 52667 ASPLUNDH COFFEE Check Number 52668 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL 52668 15-Nov-96 BARTON SAND 6 GRAVEL Totals Check Number 52660 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL Check Number 52669 BLACKOWIAK & SON Check Number 52671 52671 BRAUN INTERTEC 15-Nov-96 BRAUN INTERTEC Transaction Amount Comments 11.25 11.2! 4-WHEEL DOLLY 162.23 99.38 SIREN MAINTENANCE REPLACE LIGHTS 261.61 581.49 581.49 COPY PAPER 222.00 222.00 COFFEE 8,350 57 8.350.57 GRAVEL FOR OCB RD TRAIL 52669 15-NOV-96 BIACKCWIAK & SON 350.00 • _ _ ^ ^ ^ LEAF PICKUP Totals Check Number 52669 BLACKOWIAK & SON 350.00 Check Number 52670 BONESTROO ROSENE St ASSOC. 52670 21-Nov-96 BONESTROO ROSENE (t ASSOC.683.45 I 6 I NAVARRE-CASCO PT 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE 6 ASSOC.555.45 I t I SAGA HILLS-FOREST L 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE Sl ASSOC.466.50 96 OCB RD TRAIL IMPROV 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE i ASSOC.440.68 SEAL COAT PROJ FINAL 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.68.30 KELLY AVE SWR INSP-SEPT 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.1,719.60 L.S. 828 RENOVATION-SEPT 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE St ASSOC.336.57 WILLOW DR RFP 83 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE Si ASSOC.321 10 OCB RD BRIDGE INSP-SEP 52670 21-Nov-96 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.120.50 OCB RD TRAIL INSP-SEP 52670 21-NOV-96 BONESTROO ROSENE i ASSOC.26.75 MSA TRAFFIC MAPS Totals Check 1 Number 52670 BONESTROO ROSENE St ASSOC.4,738.90 601.30 GROUND MONITORING 21 Nov 199S Thu 4*37 PM Check Number Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name 52671 BRAUN INTERTEC Totals Check Number 52671 BRAUN INTERTEC Check Number 52672 52672 BRC-ELECTIONS 15-Nov-96 Totals Check Number BRC-ELECTIONS 52672 BRC-ELECTIONS Check Number 52673 52673 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC, 21-Nov-96 Totals Check Number BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 52673 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC, Q»eck Number 52674 52674 BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 15-NOV-96 Totals Check Number BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 52674 BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Check Number 52675 52675 BUDGET PRINTING 15-KOV-96 Totals Check Number BUDGET PRINTING 52675 BUDGET PRINTING Check Number 52676 52676 BUSINESS FORMS ii ACCOUNTING 21-NOV-96 Totals Check Number BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 52676 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING Check Number 52677 52677 CAR-TEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 15-Nov-96 Totals Check Number CAR-TEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 52677 CAR-TEL MOBILE CONOrJNICATIONS Check Number 52678 52678 CARGILL SALT DIVISION 15-NOV-96 Totals Check Number CARGILL SALT DIVISION 52678 CARGILL SALT DIVISION Check Number 52679 52679 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS 21-Nov-96 Totals Check Number CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS 52679 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS Check Number 52680 CHASPRO Transaction Amount 601.30 19.04 19.04 410.33 410.33 2,500.00 2,500.00 3.17 3.17 109.04 109.04 105.97 105.97 2,163.87 2,163.87 189.88 189.88 Page 2 Comments PADLCXTK SEALS CRUSHED LIMESTONE INSTALL LINER COLOR COPIES W2 FORMS CELL PHONE RENTAL DEICING SALT DECEMBER LEASE 52680 15-Nov-96 CHASPRO 150.OC SHARPEN CHOPPER BLADES 21 Wov 1996 Thu 4:37 PM Check Register City of Crono Check Number Date Name Check Number 52680 CKASPRO Totals Check Number 52680 CHASPRO Check Number 52681 CHESMICK. GARY 52661 05-Dec-95 CHESNICK. GARY Totals Check Number 52681 CHESWICK. GARY Check Number 52682 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO 52682 52682 52682 21-Nov-96 21-NOV-96 15-NOV-96 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO Totals Check Number 52682 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO Check Number 52683 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE 52683 21-Nov-96 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE Totals Check Number 52683 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE Check Number 52684 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 52664 15-Nov-96 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO lotals Check Number 5268-* COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO Check Number 52685 CAHLGREN SHARDLOW 6 UDAN 52685 52685 15-NOV-96 21-NOV-96 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UEAN DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN Totals Check Number 52685 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW 6 UBAN Check Number 52686 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES 52686 15-NOV-96 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES Totals Check Number 52686 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES Check Number 52667 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC 52687 15-Nov-96 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC. Totals Check Number 52697 DEM-CON LANDFILL INC Check Number 52689 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 52688 15-NOV-96 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION Totals Check Number 52688 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION Transaction Amount 150.00 12.00 12.00 53.62 1.477.63 1.822.53 3.353.78 130.00 130.00 871.23 871.23 1.976.67 1.112.49 3,089.15 213.00 213.00 36.00 36.00 38.34 38.34 Page 3 Comments REIMS LLTJCHES 8176 OIL CHANGE. DIAG TST 8169 TRANSMISSION WORK 8171 TRANSMISSION RANGE RENTAL 11-6-96 DECEMBER INSURANCE DIGITAL MAPPING DIGITAL MAPPING 8431 RUSTPROOFING DEMO FILL DISPOSAI. MICROFICHE SERVICES 21 Sov 199€ Thu 4:37 PM Check Number Check Number S26B9 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 52689 EAR. W. DAY k SONS TNC. 21-NOV-96 EAR. N. DAY k SONS INC Totals Check Number 52689 EAR. W DAY k SONS INC. Check NumLer 52690 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 52690 52690 lS-Nov-96 15-Nov-96 ESS BROTHERS k SONS ESS BROTHERS k SONS Totals Check Number 52690 ESS BROTHERS k SONS Check Number 52691 EXPRESS MESSENGER 52691 15-NOV-96 EXPRESS MESSENGER Totals Check 52691 express messenger Check Number 52692 FEED RITE CONTROLS Check Number 52694 52694 GANGELHOFF, DONNA 15-Nov-96 GANGELHOFF, DONNA Totals Check Number 52694 GANGELHOFF, DONNA Check Number 52695 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 52695 21-Nov-96 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS Totals Check Number 52695 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS Check Number 52696 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 52696 15-NOV-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC Transaction Amount 90.50 90.50 455.62 315.24 771.06 27.74 27.74 50.00 50.00 355.55 355.55 Comrents REPAIR URINAL ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUSTMENT RINGS DELIVERY SERVICE 52692 15-Nov-96 KEET BITE CONTROLS 15.00 CYLINDER RENTAL Totals Check Number RITE CONTROLS 15.00 Check Number 52693 0 & 52693 lS-Nov-96 i K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN 52693 15-Nov-96 j k K SERVICES 56.66 STREET EMPLOYEES 52693 15-NOV-96 G k K SERVICES 82.57 FLOOR MATS 52693 15-Nov-96 G k K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN 52693 lS-Nov-96 G k K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS 5269?15-NOV-96 G k K SERVICES 59.82 FLOOR MATS 52693 15-N0V-96 G k K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS 52693 35-Nov-96 G k K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN 52693 15-NOV-96 G k K SERVICES 89.49 STREET EMPLOYEES 52693 15-NOV-96 G k K SERVICES 5.74 STEFFENHAGEN Totals Check Number 52693 G k K SERVICES 413.75 DEER PICKUP DESK CHAIR Page 4 47.25 OCTOBER SERVICES r 21 Nov 1996 Thu 4:37 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Ch»ck NViii^r 52494 52694 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 15-NOV-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CAIX INC. Totals Check Hus^er 52696 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Check Number 52697 HAL MESABX 52497 15-NOV-94 HAL MESABX Totals Check Number 52697 HAL MESABX Check NunC>er 526 98 HEALTHPART!^JIS 52698 21-NOV-96 kealthpartners Totals Check Number 52698 HEALrHPARTNERS Check Number 526 99 HENNEPIN COLTTTY TREASL^RER 52699 15-Nov-94 HENNEPIN COUNT/ TREASURER Totals Check Number 526 99 HENNEPIN LOUmY TREASURER Check Number 52700 LAWN DETAILERS INC. 52700 15-NOV-96 LAWN DETAILERS INC Totals Check Number 52700 LAWN DETAILERS INC Check Number 52701 LOGIS 52701 21-NOV-96 LOGIS Totals Check Number 52701 LOGIS Check Number 52702 M 6 P UTILITIES INC 52702 15-NOV-96 M 6 P UTILITIES INC. Totals Check Number 52702 M 6 P irriLITIES INC. Check ITumber 52703 M.E.M.A. TREASURER 52703 04-Mar-96 M.E.M.A. TREASURER Totals Check Number 52703 M.E.M.A. TREASURER Check Number 52704 MEDTOX LABORATORIEL 52704 15-NOV-96 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Totals Check Number 52704 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Check Number 52705 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Transaction Amount 47.25 94.50 805.43 805.43 1«549.99 1.549.99 159.00 159.00 2.145.22 2.145.22 2.501.38 2.501.30 47.50 47.50 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00 Page 5 Comnents OCTOBER SERVICES PLOW CUTTING EDGES DECEMBER INSURANCE FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LIC OCTOBER SERVICE SEPT DATA PROCESSING LOCATE SERVICE CHESWICK - MZmERSHl P DRUG SCREENING I J 21 Hov 1996 Thu 4 :37 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 52705 S2705 METRO WASTE CONTROL COmiSSlON lS-Nov-96 METRO WASTE CONTROL COW4ISSION Totals Qieck Number 5270S METRO WASTE CONTROL COWISSION Check Number 52706 MIDWEST ASPHALT 52706 52706 15-NOV-96 15-NOV-96 MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Wunber 52706 MIDWEST ASPHALT ^eck Number 52707 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 52707 lS-Nov-96 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 52707 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 52700 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 52700 ll-Dec-95 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Totals Check Number 52700 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Check Number 52709 MN INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EDUCATIO 52709 15-NOV-96 MN INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EDUCATIO Totals Check Number 52709 MN INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EDUCATIO Check Number 52710 NAVARRE HARDWARE 52710 52710 52710 52710 lS-Nov-96 lS-Nov-96 15-NOV-96 15-Nov-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE Totals Check Number 52710 NAVARRE HARDWARE Check Number 52711 NOW CARE MEDICAL CENTERS 52711 21-Nov-96 NOW CARE MEDICAL G TERS Totals Check Number 52711 NOW CARE MEDICAL CENTERS Check Number 52712 NSP 52712 21-NOV-96 NSP Totals Check Number 52712 NSP Check Number 52713 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 52713 15-NOV-96 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Transaction Amount 23.746.00 23.746.00 331.25 235.50 566.83 31.50 31.50 74.22 74.22 195.00 195.00 10.21 37.26 41.73 349.20 430.46 35.00 35.00 1.116.06 1.116.06 17.30 t Page € Oofmneats DECEMBER HAND PATCH HAND PATCH ACETYLENE, OXYGEN DECEMBER INSURANCE ERICKSON-DOM. VIOLENCE MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS DRUG SCREEN & TEST STREET LIGHT BILL OIL CHANGE 21 Rov 1996 Thu 4:37 PH ChcdE; Number Check Reglfter City of Orono Page 7 Date Name Check Nufid>er 52713 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Totals Check Number 52713 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Check Number 52714 OFFICE DEPOT 52714 lS-Nov-96 OFFICE DEPOT Totals Check EAimber 52714 OFFICE DEPOT Oieck Number 52715 OLSON, JOE5I C 52715 07-Nov-96 OLSON. JOIC^ C Totals Check Number 52715 OLSON. JOHN C Check Number 52716 ORONO ICE ARENA INC. 52716 15-NOV-96 ORONO ICE ARENA INC. Totals Check Number 52716 ORONO ICE ARENA INC. Check Number 52717 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 52717 52717 52717 15-Nov-96 21-Nov-96 21-NOV-96 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR Totals Check Number 52717 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR Check Number 52718 PIONEER 52718 52718 52719 lS-Nov-96 15-NOV-96 15-NOV-96 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check NundDer 52718 pioneer Check Number 52719 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST Transaction Amount 17.30 294.78 294.78 72.07 72.07 215.92 215.92 70.71 369.99 243.53 684.23 63.00 84.35 07.50 234.85 Comments MISC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMS REFUND PERMIT FEE TOWING CHARGES 8427 BRAKES 8426 TRANSMISSION ORD 8152, 2ND SERIES APPLICATION 82197 LAND USE APPLICATIONS 52719 21-NOV-96 PRO TIRE &EXHAUST 25.00 8167 OIL CHANGE. 1 52719 21-NOV-96 PRO TIRE &EXHAUST 24.66 8175 OIL CHANGE 52719 21-NOV-96 PRO TIRE 6 EXHAUST 29.00 8171 TIRE SERVICE 52719 21-NOV-96 PRO TIRE &EXHAUST 300.41 8173 BRAKES 52719 21-NOV-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 25.00 8174 TIRE SERVICE 52719 15-NOV-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 58.00 8175 TIRE SERVICE 52719 lS-Nov-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 37.50 8176 TIRE SERVICE Totals Check Number 52719 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 499.77 Check Number 52720 RIT2 CAMERA 52720 15-NOV-96 RITZ CAMERA 10.95 FILM PROCESSING 21 tSbv 1996 Thu 4:37 PM Check Number Check Number 52720 Check Register City of Orono Page 8 Date Name 52720 RITZ CAMERA 21-5IOV-94 RITZ CAMERA Totals Check Number 52720 RITZ CAMERA Check Number 52721 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES 52721 21-Nov-94 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Totals Check Number 52721 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Number 52722 ROLLINS OIL CO. Check Number 52726 STAR TRIBUNE 52726 22-Feb-96 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 52726 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 52727 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. 52727 21-NOV-96 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Totals Check Number 52727 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Transaction Amount 21.41 32.36 6.628.76 6.626.76 24.05 24.05 567.96 567.96 Coments FILM PROCESSING DECEMBER ASSESSING FEE 52722 15-NOV-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.2.902.44 VULEADZD GAS 52722 15-NOV-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.339.38 FOOD GRADS OIL 52722 04-Nov-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.1.930.10 FOOD GRADE OIL 52722 04-Nov-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.234.16 MOTOR OIL Totals Check Number 52722 ROLLINS OIL CO,5.406.08 Qitck Number 52723 SA-AG INC 52723 21-NOV-96 SA-AG INC.458.62 CONCRETE SAND 52723 21-Nov-96 SA-AG INC.2.570.72 CONCRETE SAND Totals Check Number 52723 SA-AG INC.3.029.34 Check Number 52724 SCKARBER k SONS 52724 15-Nov-96 SCKARBER k SONS 35.71 OIL k FILTERS Totals Check Number 52724 SCKARBER k SONS 35.71 Check Number 52725 SNYDER DRUG STORES 52725 15-Nov-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 13.07 FILM DEVLOPING 52725 lS-Nov-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 12.65 FILM DEVELOP I N( 52725 lS-Nov-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 11.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 52725 15-Nov-9b SNYDER DRUG STORES 7.10 MISC. SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 52725 SNYDER DRUG STORES 44.27 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL SQUAD CAR TIRES 21 Nov 199€ Thu 4:37 PM Check Number Check Number 52724 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 52728 T fc t MAINTENANCE 15-Nov-94 T 4 T MAINTENANCE Totals Check Number 52728 T 4 T MAINTENANCE Transact ion Amount 600.00 600.00 Page 9 Comments PUMP OIL FROM HOIST Check Number 52729 THOMTON, MARK 52729 21-NOV-96 Totals Check Number THOMTON. MARK 52729 THOMTON. MARK 23.00 23.00 MEALS EXPENSE RSIMB Check Number 52730 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO, 52730 52730 15-NOV-96 15-Nov-96 Totals Check Number TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 52730 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 299.11 65 00 364.11 REPLACE SPRINGS ADJUST DOOR Check Number 52731 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 52731 15-NOV-96 Totals Check Number UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 52731 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 660.92 660.92 UNIFORM PURCHASES Check Number 52732 US WEST COfWUNICATIONS 52732 52732 52732 21-NOV-96 21-Nov-96 21-Nov-96 Totals Check Number US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COWUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 52732 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 13.31 54.82 66 56 134.69 US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES Check Number 52733 VEE. LIN S2733 15-Nov-96 Totals Check Number VEE, LIN 52733 VEE. LIN 134.99 134.99 MILEAGE REIMS. Check Number 52734 WARNING LITES OF MN 52734 52734 15-NOV-96 lS-Nov-96 Totals Check Number WARNING LITES OF m WARNING LITES OF MN 52734 WARNING LITES OF Mli 98.82 99.05 197.87 BARR I CAD t. RENTAL BARRICADE RENTAL Check Number 52735 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 52735 15-NOV-96 Totals Check Nu.mber WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 52735 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 10.00 10.00 TIRE REPAIR Check Number 52736 WIDMER INC 52736 21-NOV-96 WIDMER INC 512.00 WTR MAIN BREAK-DUNWOODY 21 llov 1996 Thu 4 :37 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 10 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 52736 52736 52736 WIDMER INC 21-Nov-96 WIDMER INC 21-NOV-96 WIDMER INC Totals Check Number 52736 WIDMER INC 740.00 704.00 1,956.00 WTR MAIN BREAK WTR MAIN BREAK-HWY 12 Grand Total 15,670.66 - -i—irr** --------t.JA»T> — 0>H INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETINQ NOV 2 5 1996 OF cmroFORONO ? ! < 1 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED OCTOBER 1996REPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN BPRMTlSS-111/06/96PERMIT TYPEBuilding SGL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/REMODEL ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING FIREPLACE FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURE: WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD &/OR TANK SEWER & WATER Sub-total Sign TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION TREE REMOVAL LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY 6 22 2 3 0 2 35* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF CRONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/96 - 10/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 10/01/95 - 10/31/95BASE FEE 10,300 3,911 412 150 0 717 50 25 00 00 00 00 15,498.75* VALUATION 1,594,743.00 206,999.00 27,000.00 0.00 0.00 56,300.00 1,965,042.00* PLAN REVIEW 6 1 700 080 267 0 0 466 51 00 80 00 00 05 9,322.44* QTY 5 19 4 0 1 4 33* BASE FEE 10,106 3,716 484 0 149 837 75 75 00 00 75 00 15,294.25* VALUATION 1,639,600.00 208,940.00 28,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 56,300.00 2,021,840.00* PLAN REVIEW 6,569 1,059 292 0 0 544 38 97 01 00 00 05 9,265.41* 13 1,107.19 83,750.00 0.00 7 498.75 37,581.30 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,500.00 0.00135.00 1,100.00 0.00 8 309.38 15,450.00 0.001312.50 25,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.003105.00 1,600.00 0.00 4 140.00 1,650.00 0.00135.00 295.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00135.00 700.00 0.00 2 70.00 2,050.00 0.0020*1,629.69*112,525.00*0.00*1,053.13*50,231.38*0.00* 19 1,202.07 70,776.26 0.00 15 096.25 55,369.60 0.001247.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 56.25 4,500.00 0.0020*1,449.07*70,776.26*0.00*16*952.50*59,869.60*0.00* 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00135.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.009900.00 0.00 0.00 3 300.00 0.00 0.002100.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00170.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.0015*1,175.00*0.00*0.00*6*420.00*0.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.000*C . 00*0.00*0.00*4*120.00*0.00*0.00* 1 170.64 13,651.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.001*170.64*13,651.00*0.00*0*0.00*0.00*0.00* 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 2 80.00 0.00 0.00130.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00270.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.005*200.00*0.00*0.00*3*115.00*0.00*0.00* 96**20,123.15**2,161,994.26**9,322.44**84**17,954.00**2,139,940.98**9,265.41** REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDt t « * *OCTOBER 1996BUILDINGBASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT 15,498.75 9,322.44 984.35 0.00 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION SAC FEE 225.00 ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 28,730.54 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 20.123.IE PLAN REVIEW 9,322.44 SURCHARGE 1,095.52 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 2,700.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION SAC FEE 30.00 225.00 50.00 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 33,546.11 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/96 TO 10/31/96MECHANICALPLUMBING SEWER U WATER1, € 2 9.6 9 0.00 57.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.50 1,449.07 0.00 3 8.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 1,175.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,703.62 0.00 1,499.40 50.00 0.00 1,232.50 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/96 TO 10/31/96 * * 111 USER200.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 202.50 PAGE: 36REQUESTER: CAROLESIGNFIRE0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170.64 0.00 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177.47 PAGE: 37 REQUESTER: CAROLE WED^ NOV C, 1996, 3:52 PM PAGE 1PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF CX7T0BER 1996 PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUFD ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION00000000OLSON155,242.0014731231LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 249,368.0018883145STONEWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP 261,833.0017916526HARRIS CONSTRUCTION 238,300.0014732588LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT 400,000.00 14754902 PILLAR HOMES 290,000.00 14734954 BETZ BUILDERS INC RENARD 116,000.00 19295504 HOMEWORK BY JAKE SCHLEICH 18,000.00 00000000 DOTZENROTH 7,200.00 14948810 GOLD KEY CONST WILLIAM 11,300.00 14811101 MEZZENGA CONST EASLEY 45,000.00 00000000 CORNICK 4,800 00 00000000 HEGENES 3,000.00 00000000 GASNER 1,200.00 00000000 ROOKE 1,920.00 14461345 TONY EBERT BUILDERS KLUTH 9,500.00 18925105 MILLER JOSEPH HOLM 10,000.00 00000000 HOLMES 2,640.00 15429000 DALPHIN POOL U SPA KLUTH 15,000.00 14761153 POOL CONCEPTS HOLM 12,000.00 00000000 GIESE 6,550.00 142ot559 TOP GUN ROOFING PEARSON 2,000.00 14718979 TRENDY ROOFING & SONS INC GILLQUIST 2,700.00 14733397 PLYMOUTH ROOFING STRAND 7,000.00 14495771 SUBURBAN EXTERIORS INC MACMILLAN 7,600.00 14731231 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION .00 1890424 STOCKER EXCAVATING DORR .00 1941224b HAWKINS TREE & LANDSCAPING HURD .00 14560287 MIC - GJ INC SILLERUD 14,840.00 14712216 LARSON HOMES MTKA INC LARSON 10,000.00 00000000 DAMPIER 359.00 15330352 SAWHORSE SILLERUD 17,000.00 14750918 BRUCE BREN HOMES BREHM 25,000.00 14752097 nOYER & SONS INC TOTH 17,500.00 14719444 CumSSIC BUILDERS REMODELER PRATBERNON 2,190.00 12516401 EBERT fit HANSON 13,651.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS FELDMAN 400.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS RASMUSSEN 600.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS YOUNKI 600.00 39414211 KLEVE HTG fit AC BERINGAUSE 9,700.00 38880040 ABATEC MECHANICAL, INC DEVOR 295.00 34789558 DITTER INC EDELMANN 1,875.00 34789558 DirrER INC POST 15,000.00 37576200 BLAINE HTG AC fit ELEC INC ROBERTS 1,500.00 39414211 KLEVE HTG fit AC 15,300.00 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 1,100.00 27539777 ARE PLUMBING TODD 3,900.00 34701208 STEINKRAUS PLBG fit HTG SCHEFERS 14,300.00 35935300 ROUSE MECHANICAL INC DORR 3,000.00 24796715 KINGSWAY PLUMBING HALE 9,975.00 35C FI 1C MB 0101010101 01 02 02 02 03 04 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 09 09 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 24 29 29 29 29 29 29 35C 19 1C 01 01 ■:i 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 47571101276030652005 450 1185 3980 3225 2055 4105 4305 2675 884 4190 2801 45 1390 2801 45 2400 4345 993 645 1700 1101 980 2795 1415 3877 3550 1415 430 2811 3505 3340 345 420 1180 1489 2630 750 575 2340 2920 575 50 2540 980 850 TONKAVIEW LA FERNDALE RD W WATERTOWN RD WATERTOWN RD SUGARWOOD DR OLD LONG LAKE RI TONKAWA RD NORTH SHORE DR CASCO CIR WEBBER HILLS RD HIGHWOOD RD CHIPPEWA LA SHADYWOOD RD DAKOTA AVE HIGHWOOD RD FOX ST LUCE LINE RIDGE PARK DR FOX ST LUCE LINE RIDGE WATERTOWN RD WATERTOWN RD WILDHUPST TR FERNDALE RD N FOX ST FERNDALE RD W TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD PARK DR SHORELINE DR IVY PL PARK DR BROWN RD S FARVIEW LA WATERTOWN RD '^6/10/1796/i?/l496/10/109C/:J/1o 96/10/15 96/10/23 96/10/14 96/10/17 96/10/31 96/10/07 96/10/14 96/10/01 96/10/02 96/10/10 96/10/15 96/10/11 96/10/31 96/10/30 96/10/01 96/10/11 96/10/07 96/10/08 96/10/08 96/10/14 96/10/14 96/10/14 96/lO/OC 96/10/29 96/10/09 96/10/31 96/10/01 96/10/08 96/10/07 96/10/24 96/10/31 OR-008454OR-008466OR-008482OR-008496OR-008497 OR-008514 OR-008455 OR-008506 OR-008S26 OR-008430 OR-008485 OR-008261 OR-008429 OR-008456 OR-008484 OR-008490 OR-008525 OR-008528 OR-008336 OR-0nS483 OR-008452 OR-008469 OR-008470 OR-008492 OR-008494 OR-008465 OR-008471 OR-008520 OR-008480 OR-0083U2 OR-008434 OR-008444 OR-008446 OR-008505 OR-008531 SHORELINE DR 96/10/30 OR-008523 SPRING HILL RD BROWN RD S WYNDMERE RD SHORELINE DR COUNTRYSIDE DR W TONKAWA RD SUSSEX CIR FOX ST SOMERSET LA SUSSEX CIR LANDMARK DR CASCO POINT RD TONKAWA RD OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD 96/10/02 OR- 96/10/02 OR- 96/10/02 OR- 96/10/03 OR- 96/10/07 OR- 96/10/09 OR- 96/10/09 OR- 96/10/07 OR- 96/10/07 OR- 96/10/09 96/10/11 96/10/16 96/10/16 S 96/10/22 OR OR OR OR OR 008437 008438 008439 008448 008450 008457 008458 008459 008460 008481 008488 008503 008504 008509 WED, NOV 6, 1996, 3:52 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1996 PAGE 2PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONGEHL3,400.0025,000.00CUFF1,800.00ROHRER2,000.00 OORLOG 2,000.00 DOSSETT 700.00 RUNKLE .00 CARL 750.00 EVENHOUSE 500.00 BIGLEY 166.76 EDMUNDS 202.52 MORRIS 320.59 NELSON 191.39 SCHEFFERS 13,825.00 NESSER 150.00 12,500.00 HALE 14,930.00 LEBEDOFF 7,410.00 RENARD 5,400.00 O'SULLIVAN 3,500.00 1,730.00 VONGRIES 800.00 SILLERUD 5,000.00 FRAHM 400.00 LARSON 2,500.00 HELGREN 500.00 RUNKLE .00 JOHNSTON .00 .00 RUSSFLL .00 .00 THOMPSON .00 PERL .00 BELAWSKI .00 TURKBAS .00 HOLM .00 WALDRON .00 .00 JOHNSON .00 ROWLETTE .00 YOUNG .00 HANSEN .00 DEVERE .00 NESSER .00 WIGLEY .00 .00 BERINGAUSE .00 ME 20C PL 20C SW IbC UD 02192424 24 29 20C 1825336046601424 1050 2795 CONCORDIA ST SHORELINE DR BAYSIDE RD BALDUR PARK RD LOMA LINDA AVE PHEASANT PD 96/10/0096/10/0496/10/0196/10/01 96/10/16 9b/10/l8 OR-000464OR-008442OR-000431OK-000432 OR-008502 OR-00H508 39296767393340003440582834791600 34*"91600 34782452 01 2684 CASCO POINT RD 96/10/02 OR-008436 15099011 01 3780 NORTHERN AVE 96/10/04 OR-000443 00000000 01 1729 EAGERNESS POINT RD 96/10/08 OR-008462 24490147 01 1180 LYMAN AVE 96/10/08 OR-008473 29337200 01 1040 TONKAWA RD 96/10/08 OR-008474 29337200 01 2510 CASCO POINT RD 96/10/08 OR-008475 29337200 01 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RD 96/10/08 OR-000476 29337200 01 2540 CASCO POINT RD 96/10/09 OR-000479 24701208 01 455 TONKAWA RD 96/10/10 OR-008406 29335636 01 575 SUSSEX CIR 96/10/11 OR-000489 .9332521 01 850 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S 96/10/17 OR-00050 /^4796715 01 1101 FERNPALE RD W 96/10/30 OR-008529 253343^7 02 1105 TONKAWA RD 96/10/15 OR-008494 28663057 19 3340 SHORELINE DR 96/10/07 OR-008451 24720805 19 2725 WAYZATA BLVD 9 /10/30 OR-000530 25334357 24 4051 HIGHWOOD RD 96/10/03 OR-008447 28274033 24 1415 r/vRK DR 96/10/14 OR-008493 27735740 24 2520 CASCO POINT RD 96/10/22 Ok-008512 28274033 29 3077 SHORELINE DR 96/10/31 OR-000303 OOOOOOOC 29 865 WINDJAMMER LA 96/10/07 OR-008453 0000 20C 01 2604 CASCO POINT RD 96/10/02 OR-008435 1509. 1 01 2335 Sl^ADOWOOD DR 96/10/03 OR-008441 54791762 01 1920 6TH AVE N 96/10/06 ■3461 54425855 01 3050 SUSSEX RD 96/10/08 j08467 55592721 01 505 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 96/lO/OP .-R-008468 54425855 01 1520 TANGLEWOGJ RD 96/10/<-OR-008472 5471B151 01 309 WESTLAKE ST 96/10/08 OR-OOB477 29338603 01 1690 CONCORDIA ST 96/10/08 OR-OOU478 24 /22316 01 2685 COPPER VIEW DR 96/10/15 OR-008499 54775649 01 15 LUCE LINE RIDGE 96/10/15 OR-008500 54775649 01 1830 FOX ST 96/10/16 OR-008501 54791547 01 3065 WATERTOWN RD 96/10'22 OR-008510 54710151 01 4520 WATERTOWN RD 96/10/22 OR-008511 54718151 01 25 CYGNET PL 96/10/24 OR-008516 24731657 24 3520 WATERTOWN RD 96/10/24 OR-008515 54718151 15C 01 1800 CONCORDIA ST 96/10/03 OR-000440 00000000 01 2570 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 96/10/08 OR-000463 84775296 01 455 TONKAWA RD 96/10/10 OR-008407 89411138 01 1035 TONKAWA RD 96/10/11 OR-008491 14736649 19 2300 SHADYWOOD RD 96/10/25 OR-008519 OOOOOGOO 34 1409 SHORELINE DR 96/10/01 OR-003433 00000000 VOGT FRED t CO PUMP & METER .SERVICE AIR REFRIGERATION COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C SCHERBER U SONS INC J S STEWARl COMPANIES INC CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. CULLIGAN CULLICAN CULLIGAN CULLIGAN STEINKRAUS PLBG INC DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SEKV. THOMPSON PLBG KINGSWAY PLUMBING PLYMOUTH PLUMBING SOUTHTOWN PLBG ALS MASTER PLUMBING PLYMOUTH PLUMBING NORBLOM PLUMBING CO DINIUS PLUMBING NORBLOM PLUMBING CO J S STEWART COMPANIES INC HAYES EXCAVATING SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES BAUER TRUCKING SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES PETERSON ELMER J CO HIGHVIEW PLBG COPPIN PLBG RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING VOLKENANT & SONS INC PETERSON ELMER J CO PETERSON ELMER J CO FADDEN CLIFF k SONS PETERSON ELMER J CO FIC INC HOLASEK DEAN LANDSCAPING PLUS 97C 2,iol,994.26* r~' 9999 01 Residence 24 Replacing Existing02Addition25Lifting Principal Residence03Garage/Attached 26 Well Abandonment04Garage/Detached 27 Foundation Only05Porch28Temporary Traxier06Deck29Renovate/Remodel 07 Fence 30 Accessory Structure 08 Gazebo 31 Stairway to Lake 09 Pool 32 Retaining Wall 10 Re-side 33 Entrance Monuments 11 Re-roof 34 Tree Removal 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined LOCAL DSB CODES Undefined WED, NOV 6, 1996, 3:51 PMNUMERICAL LISTING OCTCBER 19%PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST m VALUATIONOR-008261 OR-008302 OR-008303 OR-008336 OR-008429 OR-008430 OR-008431 OR-008432 OR-C08433 OR-008434 OR-008435 OR-008436 OR-008437 OR-008438 OR-008439 OR-008440 OR-008441 OR-008442 OR-008443 OR-008444 OR-008446 OR-008447 OR-C08448 OR-008450 OR-008451 OR-008452 OR-008453 OR-008454 OR-008455 OR-008456 OR-008457 OR-008458 OR-008459 OR-008460 OR-008461 OR-008462 OR-008463 OR-008464 OR-008465 OR-OOJi466 OR-008467 OR-008468 OR-008469 OR-008470 OR-008471 OR-008472 OR-008473 OR-008474 OR-008475 OR-008476 OR-008477 OR-008478 OR-008479’ OR-008480 96/10/01 N 4305 96/10/31 N 3877 96/10/31 N 3877 96/10/01 N 2801 96/10/02 N 2675 96/10/07 N 2055 96/10/01 N 4660 96/10/01 N 1424 96/10/01 N 1489 96/10/01 N 3550 96/10/02 N 2684 96/10/02 N 2684 96/10/02 N 345 96/10/02 N 420 96/10/02 N 1180 96/10/03 N 1800 96/10/03 N 2335 96/10/04 N 3360 96/10/04 N 3780 96/10/08 N 1415 96/10/07 N 430 96/10/03 N 4051 96/10/03 N 1489 96/10/07 N 2630 96/10/07 N 3340 96/10/07 N 2400 96/10/C7 N 865 96/10/17 N 4757 96/10/14 N 1185 96/10/10 N 884 96/10/09 N 750 96/10/09 N 575 96/10/07 N 2340 96/10/07 N 2920 96/10/08 N 1920 96/10/08 N 1729 96/10/08 N 2670 96/10/08 N 1825 96/10/14 N 1101 96/10/14 N 1101 96/10/08 N 3050 96/10/08 N 505 96/10/08 N 4345 96/10/08 N 993 96/10/08 N 980 96/10/08 N 1520 96/10/08 N 1180 96/10/08 N 1040 96/10/08 N 2510 96/10/08 N 3335 96/10/08 N 309 96/10/08 N 1690 96/10/09 N 2540 96/10/09 N 1415 CHIPPEWA LA SHORELINE DR SHORELINE DR FCX ST SHADYWOOD RD WEBBER HILLS RD BAYSIDE RD BALDUR PARK RD SHORELINE DR IVY PL CASCO POINT PD CASCO POINT RD SPRING HILL RD BROWN RD S WYNDMERE RD CONCORDIA ST SHADOWOOD DR SHORELINE DR NORTHERN AVE PARK DR BROWN RD S HIGHWOOD RD SHORELINE DR COUNTRYSIDE DR W shoreline dr WATERTOWN RD windjammer la TONKAVIEW LA TONKAWA RD DAKOTA AVE TONKAWA RD SUSSEX CIR FOX ST SOMERSET LA 6TH AVE N EAGERNESS POINT RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W CONCORDIA ST FERNDALE RD W FERNDALE RD W SUSSEX RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S WATERTOWN RD WILDHURST TR TONKAWA RD TANGLFWOOD RD LYMAN AVE TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY RD WESTLAKE ST CONCORDIA ST CASCO POINT RD PARK DR 06 00000000 29 14712216 29 00000000 09 15429000 06 00000000 03 14948810 24 34485828 24 34791600 34 00000000 29 00000000 01 15099011 01 15099011 01 34282826 01 34282826 01 34282826 01 00000000 01 54791762 19 39334800 01 00000000 29 15330352 29 14750918 24 28274033 01 39414211 01 38880040 19 24720805 11 00000000 29 00000000 01 00000000 02 : 4954 06 0 uOOOO 01 34789558 01 34789558 01 37576200 01 39414211 01 54425855 01 24490147 01 84775296 02 39296767 16 14731231 01 14731231 01 55592721 01 54425855 11 14284559 11 14718979 16 18904241 01 54718151 01 29337200 01 29337200 01 29337200 01 29337200 01 29338600 01 24722316 01 24701208 24 14560287 LARSON HOMES MTKA INC DALPHIN POOL & SPA GOLD KEY CONST AIR REFRIGERATION COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C J S STEWART COMPANIES INC J S STEWART COMPANIES INC PRACTICAL SYSTEMS PRACTICAL SYSTEMS PRACTICAL SYSTEMS HAYES EXCAVATING PUMP & METER SERVICE SAWHORSE BRUCE BREN HOMES NORBLOM PLUMBING CO KLEVE HTG U AC ABATEC MECHANICAL, INC ALS MASTER PLIT4BING BETZ BUILDERS INC DITTER INC DITTER INC BLAINE HTG AC L ELEC INC KLEVE HTG k AC SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. HC INC VOGT FRED & CO LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION BAUER TRUCKING SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES TOP GUN ROOFING TRENDY ROOFING & SONS INC STOCKER EXCAVATING PETERSON ELMER J CO CULLIGAN CULLICAN CULLIGAN CULLIGAN HIGHVIEW PLBG COPPIN PLBG STEINKRAUS PLBG INC MIC - GJ INC CORNICK LARSON LARSON KLUTH HEGENES WILLIAM CUFF ROHRER BERINGAUSE DAMPIER RUNKLE RUNKLE FELDMAN RASMUSSEN YOUNKI HANSEN JOHNSTON CARL SILLERUD BREHM VONGRIES BERINGAUSE DEVOR O’SULLIVAN GIESE HELGREN CLSQN RENARD GASNER EDELMANN POST ROBERTS EVENHOUSE DEVERE GEHL RUSSELL PEARSON GILLQUIST DORR THOMPSON BIGLEY EDMUNDS MORRIS NELSON PERL BELAWSKI .SCHEFFERS SILLERUD 4.800.00 10,000.00 2.500.00 15.000. 00 3.000. 00 11.300.00 1.800.00 2.000. 00 .00 359.00 .00 .00 400.00 600.00 600.00 .00 .00 25.000. 00 750.00 17.000. 00 25.000. 00 800.00 9.700.00 295.00 3.500.00 6.550.00 500.00 155.242.00 116,000.00 1.200.00 1.875.00 15.000. 00 1.500.00 15.300.00 .00 500.00 .00 3.400.00 .00 249.368.00 .00 .00 2,000.00 2.700.00 .00 .00 166.76 202.52 320.59 191.39 .00 .00 13.825.00 14.840.00 WED, NOV. 6, 1996, 3:51 PM PAGE 2NUMERICAL LISTING PERMIT NBR ISSUED OCTOBER 1996CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPAi^JY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONHOLM1,100.00 261,833.00 12,000.00ROOKE1,920.00EASLEY45,000.00 NESSER 150.00 NESSER .00 TODD 3,900.00 KLUTH 12,500.00 9,500.00 WIGLEY .00 STRAND 7,000.00 SILLERUD 5,000.00 MACMILLAN 7,600.00 RENARD 238,300.00 400,000.00 5,400.00 TURKBAS .00 HOLM .00 WALDRON .00 OORLOG 2,000.00 SCHEFERS 14,300.00 DORR 3,000.00 TOTH 17,500.00 SCHLEICH 18,000.00 HALE 14,930.00 DOSSETT 780.00 HALE 9,975.00 JOHNSON .00 .00 FRAHM 400.00 YOUNG 290,000.00 .00 ROWLETTE .00 HURD • 00 .00 HOLM 13,651.00 10,000.00 DOTZENROTH 7,200.00 HOLMES 2,640.00 LEBEDOFF 7,410.00 PRATBERNON 1.730.00 2.190.00 OR>008481OR-008482OR-008483OR-008484OR-008485OR>008486 OR-008487 OR-008488 OR-008489 OR-008490 OR-008491 OR-008492 OR-008493 OR-008494 OR-008496 OR-008497 OR>008498 OR-008499 OR-008500 OR-008501 OR-008502 OR-008503 OR-008504 OR-008505 OR-008506 OR-008507 96/10/09 N 96/10/10 N 96/10/11 N 96/-'0/15 N 96/10/14 N 96/10/10 N 96/10/10 N 96/10/11 N 96/10/11 N 96/10/11 N 96/10/11 N 96/10/14 N 96/10/14 N 96/10/14 N 96/10/16 N 96/10/15 N 96/10/15 N 96/10/15 N 96/10/15 N 96/10/16 N 96/10/16 N 96/10/16 N 96/10/16 N 96/10/24 N 96/10/17 N 96/10/17 N 57527604541904105455 455 50 575 2801 1035 645 1415 1700 3065 2005 1185 2685 45 1880 1058 2540 980 2811 3980 850 SUSSEX CIR 01 WATERTOWN RD 01 LUCE LINE RIDGE 09 HIGHWOOD RD 06 HIGHWOOD RD 0< TONKAWA RD 01 TONKAWA RD 01 LANDMARK DR 01 SUSSEX CIR 01 FOX ST 06 TONKAWA FD 01 FERNDALE RD N 11 PARK DR 24 FOX ST 11 WATERTOWN RD 01 SUGARWOOD DR 01 TONKAWA RD 02 COPPER VIEW DR 01 LUCE LINE RIDGE 01 FOX ST 01 LOMA LINDA AVE 24 CASCO POINT RD 01 TONKAWA RD 01 FARVIEW LA 29 NORTH SHORE DR 02 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 01 OR-008508 Sb/lO/18 N 2795 PHEASANT RD 29 OR-008509 96/10/22 N 850 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD s 01 OR-008510 96/10/22 N 3065 WATERTOWN RD 01 OR-008511 96/10/22 N 4520 WATERTOWN RD 01 OR-008512 96/10/22 N 2520 CASCO POINT RD 24 OR-008514 96/10/23 N 450 OLD LONG LAKE RD 01 OR-008515 96/10/24 N 3520 WATERTOWN RD 24 OR-008516 96/10/24 N 25 CYGNET PL 01 OR-008519 96/10/25 Y 2380 SHADYWOCD RD 19 OR-008520 96/10/29 N 2795 Cf'-QO POINT RD 16 OR-008523 96/10/30 N 3340 SHORELINE DR 19 OR-008525 96/10/31 N 45 LUCE LINE RIDGE 06 OR-008526 96/10/31 N 3225 CASCO CIR 02 OR-008528 96/10/30 N 1390 PARK DR 06 OR-008529 96/10/30 N 1101 FERNDALE RD W 01 OR-008530 96/10/30 N 2725 WAYZATA BLVD 19 OR-008531 96/10/31 N 3505 WATERTOWN RD 29 363325611888314514761153oooooooc14811101 29335636 89411138 r <539777 29332521 14461345 14736649 14733397 27735740 14495771 17916526 14732588 28663057 54775649 54775649 54791547 34791600 34701208 35935300 1475209' 19295* t 24796715 34702452 24796715 54718151 54718151 28274033 14754902 54718151 24731657 OOOOOOOC 19412245 12516401 18925105 00000000 OOOOOOOC 25334357 25334357 14719444 FIRESIDE CORNER S'rONEWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP POOL CONCEPTSMEZZENGA CONST DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SER\. HOLASEK DEAN ARE PLUMBING THOMPSON PLBG TONY EBERT BUILDERS LANDSCAPING PLUS PLYMOUTH ROOFING DINIUS PLUMBING SUBURBAN EXTERIORS INC HARRIS CONSTRUCTION LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT SOUTHTOWN PLBG RITTER EXCAVATING RITTER EXCAVATING VOLKENANT SONS INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C STEINKRAUS PLBG U HTG ROUSE MECHANICAL INC BOYER & SONS INC HOMEWORK BY JAKE KINGSWAY PLUMBING SCHERBER U SONS INC KINGSWAY PLUMBING PETERSON ELMER J CO PETERSON ELMER J CO NORBLOM PLUMBING CO PILLAR HOMES PETERSON ELMER J CO FADDEN CLIFF U SONS HAWKINS TREE & LANDSCAPIN' EBERT & HANSON MILLER JOSEPH PLYMOUTH PLUMBING PLYMOUTH PLUMBING 97C ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-l DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 » PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * * * *PAGE; 1REQUESTERt CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/96 - 10/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 10/01/95 - 10/31/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWUser DefinedSUBDIVISION 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 3 1 400.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 4 880.00 0.00 0.00 4 850.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 4 1,465.00 0.00 0.00 2 700.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 1 550.00 0.00 0.00 2 625.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 12*3,645.00*0.00*0.00*12*2,675.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 12**3,645.00**0.00**0.00**12**2,675.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/96 TO 10/31/96 * t * * *PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE BASE FEE USER 3,645.00 REPORT TOTAL 3,645.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 3,645.00 3,645.00 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/9C PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLE3CTED YEAR-TO-DATEPERMIT TYPEBuilding SGL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/REMODEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-ADD/REMODEL SF-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD &/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER k WATER Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY QTY 37 231 26 10 1 6 0 1 3 0 1 2 141 0 9 4 1B4* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 10/31/96BASE FEE 72,390 48,602 3,334 640 948 688 0 80 349 0 0 60 4 1 .75 .75 .75 .00 .50 .75 .00 . 00 .25 . 00 .00 .00 VALUATION 11,653,040.00 3,817,426.00 198.982.00 0.00 985,000.00 167.026.00 0.00 0.00 252.720.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 47,053 23,381 1,967 0 3,216 374 0 0 0 0 1,714 0 .90 . 84 .25 . 00 .53 .89 .00 . 00 . 00 . 00 .21 . 00 9,713.06 0.00 1,311.00 140.00 11,164 .06* 606,889.47 0.00 2,750.00 1,IfO.OO 610,789.47* 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00* QTY 35 210 26 14 0 12 1 3 3 1 1 7 114 1 4 4 123* PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 10/31/95BASE FEE VALUATION 61,430 48,625 4,477 960 0 3,461 .60 .75 .50 .00 .00 .75 529.75 130.OC 331.25 72.00 0.00 230.00 19 3,287.25 210,592.00 1,950.33 15 3,037.00 337*137,382.00*17,284,786.00*79,658.95*330*123,285.60* 90 8,093.08 624,983.28 0.00 56 4,647.8116772.40 53,051.00 0.00 15 735.00 2 97.01 6,060.43 0.00 0 0.00 54 2,272.71 130,365.44 0.00 50 2,184.38 5 175.00 5,375.00 0.00 3 140.^3 2 347.50 26,000.00 0.00 0 C .00 8 470.00 23,350.00 0.00 8 280.00 10 392.94 15,420.00 0.00 8 280.00 11 405.00 16,105.00 0.00 8 290.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 247.50198*13,025.64*900,610.15*0.00*149*8,795.32* 10,762, 5,039, 445, 455, 45, 17, 5, 550, 202, 17,522, 228 644 200 0 0 467 000 0 800 000 000 0 485 624 353,831 43,905 0 120,724 9,925 0 3 7 350 065 8,650 19,600 566,250 . 00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* .38 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .38* 7,948.72 162.50 482.00 161.25 8,754.47* 524,261.84 13,000.00 1,200.00 6,200.00 544,661.84* PLAN REVIEW 39,928 25,426 2,833 0 0 617 344 0 158 46 1,423 0 1,960 72,738 .51 .12 .18 .00 .00 .66 .34 . 00 .60 .wO . Id .00 .40 .79* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 16 560.00 0.00 0.00 10 350.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 5,150.00 0.00 0.00 33 3,300.00 0.00 0.006300.00 0.00 0.00 4 200.00 0.00 0.00 11 6,550.00 0.00 0.00 7 5,950.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0.007490.00 0.00 0.00 2 140.00 0.00 0.0095*13,155.00*0.00*0.00*60*10,080.00*0.00*0.00* 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 1,500.00 0.00 29.25 90.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 7 70.00 270.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERfCTTS ISSUED/FEES C0LLEX7TED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO • • * • •PAGE: 2REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 10/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 10/31/95PERMIT TYPE Sub-total OTY5*BASE FEE 154.25*VALUATION 800.00*PLAN REVIEW 0.00*QTY11*BASE FEE 410.00*VALUATION1,900.00*PLAN REVIEW0.00*Fire FIREWORKS FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total 0 1 1* 0.00 170.64 170.64* 0.00 13,651.00 13,651.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 3 0 3* 150.00 0.00 150.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* User Defined LAJ^D ALTERATION TREE REMOVAL RETAINING WALLS DOCKS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total 22 6 4 2 26 60* 1,225.00 180.00 396.00 60.00 910.00 2,771.00* 0. on 0.00 29,790.00 0.00 0.00 29,790.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 16 5 1 0 10 32^ 810.00 150.00 100.00 0.00 350.00 1,410.00* 3.000. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.000. 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* Grand-total 850**177,022.59*»18,840,426.62**79,650.95**708**152,885.39**18,638,636.22**72,738.79** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN FEE MQIL IN ENGINEERING FEES PLANT CHARGE SEWER PLANT SAC FEE ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED/FEES mU£CTED YEAR-TO-DATEBUILDING137,382.0079,658.958,653.610.00 28,750.00 1,035.25 0.00 1.50 1,580.00 225.00 225.00 0.00 257,511.31 MECHANICAL 13,025.64 0.00 455.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 153.62 3.00 0.03 13,637.39 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONOFROM 01/01/96 TO 10/31/96t * • * ♦PLUMBING 11,164.06 0.00 322.68 0.00 0 00 J.OO w . 0 0 87.28 1.50 0.00 11,575.52 SEWER k WAiER 13,155.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 5C.00 50.00 0.00 15,103.00 USER 2,771.00 0.00 25.38 0 00 0.00 35.00 0.00 3.00 50.00 0.00 2,884.38 PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLESIGN 154.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154.25 FIRE170.640.006.830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177.47 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/96 TO 10/31/96 * * * * *PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE BASE FEB PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN FEE MQIL IN ENGINEERING FEES PLANT CHARGE SEWER PLANT SAC FEE ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 177,822.59 79,658.95 9,505.63 0.00 30,550.00 1,070.25 0.00 251.40 1,580.00 50.00 1.50 3.00 50.00 225.00 225.00 50.00 0.00 301,043.32 ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 * PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLEPERMIT TYPEUser Defined SUBDIVISION VARIANCE CUP SKETCH PLAN VARIANCE/CUP VACATION REZONING APPEAL Sub-total Grand-tc*“al . . . . . . . CURRENT01/01/96 -RANGE - - - - -10/31/96 . . . . . . . PREVIOUS01/01/95 -RANGE . . . . .10/31/95QTYBASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW126,095.00 0.00 0.00 15 6,015.00 0.00 0.005211,545.00 0.00 0.00 50 10,200.00 0.00 0.00123,100.00 0.00 0.00 16 3,125.00 0.00 0.0041,000.00 0.00 0.00 9 1,600.00 0.00 0.0071,940.00 0.00 0.00 8 2,075.00 0.00 0.00 4 1,150.00 0.00 0.00 3 1,175.00 0.00 0.00 2 350.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.0094*26,330.00*0.00*0.00*102*25,890.00*0.00*0.00* 94**26,330.00**0.00**0.00**102* *25,890.00**0.00* *0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/06/96 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/96 TO 10/31/96 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 26,330.00 26,330.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 26,330.00 26,330.00 1 1996 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIESJanuary February March April June July August September October November December YTD TotalsSpring ParkPlan Review 82.87 438.59 20U.36 0.00 576.71 105.30 3.243.33 723.94 4.383.11 607.27 9.754.21Inspections390.00 120.OC 195.00 “>85.00 135.00 150.00 195.00 180.00 330.00 255.00 1.780.00Retainer25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 250.00 TOTAL 497.87 583.59 420.36 310.00 "16.71 280.30 3.463.33 928.94 4.738.11 887.27 12.846.48 No. Plan Reviews 0 1 2 0 1 2 6 5 2 21 No. Inspections 26 8 13 19 9 10 13 12 22 17 149 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 0.00 772.37 511.55 744.57 308.43 1.480.04 146.09 194.68 0.00 1.489.15 5,646.88 Inspections 135.00 30.00 30.00 75.00 135.00 60.00 210.00 135.00 105.00 90.00 1,005.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 250.00 TOTAL 160.00 827.37 566.55 844.57 ««68.43 1.565.04 381.09 354.68 130.00 1,604.15 6.901.88 No. Plan Reviews 0 2 2 3 2 4 1 2 0 6 22 No. Inspections 9 2 2 5 9 4 14 9 7 6 67 657.87 1.410.96 986.91 1.154.57 1,205.14 1.845.34 3.844.42 1,283.62 4.868.H J.S91»42 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 1011 First Street S«>uth. Suite 200. Hopkins. MN 55343 (612> 933-0005 Fax: (hl2i 93? November 15. 19% Mayor and City Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bav, MN 55323-0066 • 9 D*;ar Mayor and City Council: Third quarter repo't 1996, on closed cases for the residents, businesses and city staff of Orono 1. City/resident, self referral, conciliated Several of the cities in our service area have been interested in increasing the usage of mediation in disputes and have asked us to explain our services to city staff so they can understand the process VVe would be happy to do so for the staff in Orono Please call our office to schedule a convenient time Enclosed is a laminated card on steps to resolve a cont^ici which ' e hope to widely distribute in our service area Any ideas you might have on distribution in your city would be welcomed Sincerely, :h' Susan A Nelson Executive Director enclosure