Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-12-1996 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1996, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each ot^e Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. u Li cM- i/f-' Ctryop ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦ 2. Regular Meeting of July 22, 1996 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS'-%de Lindquist Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT -t 3 /^2153 Ben Young, 3106 Sixth Avenue North - Variance - Resolution 4. #2131 Larry Karkela, 4149 Highwood Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Resolution 5 #2134 Robert Albrecht, 1810 Shady wood Road - Variance - Denial Resolution ^6. #2136 Greenfield Corp., 180 North Shore Drive West - Preliminary Subdivision Approval Resolution 7. Big Island Inc. - Amendment to 1996 Joint Use Dock License - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCEL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT ^8. Bid Award - Lift Station #28 Renovation 9. Pay Request #1 Kelly Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvement ^10. Pay Request #1 and Final 1996 Seal Coat Project CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 11. Appeal of Local SAC and WAC Charges for 3340 Shoreline Drive 12. Internal Trails in Old Crystal Bay Road Addition (Dickey Property) </13. Appointment of Election Judges - Resolution •5^14. 1997 Assessor's Agreement -1^15. Additional Reponing Required - Crystal Bay City Hall Site - Momloring Wells 16. McCulley Road Plat Proposal 17. Select Date for Work Session CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (♦18.) LICENSES (*19.) BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1996, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMIN^^SUES AND EVENTS 08/12 08/13 08/13 08/19 08/26 08/27 09/02 09/03 09/09 09/10 09/10 09/16 09/23 Councfl^eeting 7:00 p.m. Council Work Session 8:00 a.m. Representative Jim Ramstad - Town Meeting 7:00-8:00 p.m. Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Filing Opens for Municipal Election - Closes Sept. 10 at 4:30 p.m. HOLIDAY - Labor Day TUESDAY - Paik Commission 7:15 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. PRIMARY ELECTION - No public meetings before 8:00 p.m. Last Day for Filing for Municipal Election - Filings Close at 4:30 p.m. Plamiing Commission 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. I V ■I if Public A ttendance X .«rv * Meeting D ate A>c. !9% ••W4 □ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please fill out the information requested below for our city records . NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (rrom agenda) NAME OR NUMBER r 'p)f? __Lt>Mr 3/tf /U /4c' ^isM. ^ I -f^ V C tt tp \JZ> i. iXlV^i ]|\A^A*^K.A*HL'>rT'__________C-Q.-n ---- : tbLeLl HY^ mil6 8.. V / H2^ (^o *.__13 i^iJ .c- __________--------------------------------------------------- / \ y 5 (^/JJjIha ^irLy /* I' OtO^'^n i' 41 ^ w .................r t^n •fU! S.4 f tvIryCi^i^ 0‘_'__k o Public A ttendance Lk. 1 3 19%Meeting Date Council Planning commission Park Commission Other Please fill out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER \! iTM •ZBoo ]2- fir-- 4.X ^^ C r~ Oil T'y5?fc\c^, 5. -j-fY\/ ^GruAi^ - ~7 C-55 6. 12- #/ ddr (> i 1 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14. 15. 09U9M V ORONO CITY COtNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 22, 1996 ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members pres^O>^ Mayor Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, JoEIIen Hurr, and Charles Kelley Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Zoning and Planning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7;00 p m. (*#1) CONSENT AGENDA Item #2 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Items #6, 7, and 12 were added to the Consent Agenda. Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (#2) REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 8, 1996 The Minutes were amended in Item #6, Application #2 134 for Rob Albrecht. Goetten asked that the minutes clarify her statement that it be made clear that no further hardcover would be allowed on this property in the future and that the property had reached its hardcover limits. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 8, 1996, as amended. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner McMillan informed the Council that the Commission is looking forward to receiving input and direction regarding the Park Master Plan. A work session is scheduled for Tuesday, July 30. Jabbour asked that Gaffron read the draft of the Park Master Plan and give his comments to the Council. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Planning Commission w as present PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. J * MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (*#3) #2025 MICHAEL PLANK. 4115 WATERTOWN ROAD. FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3741 Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt Resolution #3741 of the plat of Maple Place Second Addition Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) #2134 ROBERT ALBRECHT. 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD - AFTER-THE FACT VARIANCE The applicant was present GaflVon reported that the Council at their July 8 meeting had conceptually approved an after-the-fact hardcover variance A draft resolution with conditions and requiring appropriate after-the-fact fees was presented to the Council with the advisory that the property had reached its hardcover limit Gaflron referred to the resolution, item #3 on page 4 of 6 The applicant had no ftirther comments Goetten asked that the resolution be clear in its language regarding no further hardcover on the property and asked the attorney to review it. She questioned whether the language was as forceful as it could She noted that the July 8 minutes lacked her notation that no further hardcover would be allowed on the property and the property has reached it hardcover limits She asked that the minutes be amended to reflect this. Barrett said the draft did attempt to say what was intended but was not presuming to bind a ftiture Council as it did not have the authority to do so Goetten asked that the resolution be made clear that this Council is against any additional hardcover in the future. Barrett suggested the draft be amended to state, "This Council recommends that no further hardcover variance be granted on this property." Kelley asked if it was the intent of this Council not to approve any future hardcover variance for this property or for increases to hardcover. He noted that the property owner may need a variance in order to svitch or trade structure. Jabbour asked that it be worded so the intended change would not require the applicant coming back again before the Council. Goetten responded that the resolution should state that there should not be any increases to hardcover. Callahan said it was not his intent to vote in favor of the approval resolution and a vote may be in order. Kelley noted that the applicant's attorney was not present; and if the vote were such that the resolution be denied, he suggested the application then be tabled. 1 \ I_____ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (#4 - #2134 Robert Albrecht - Continued) Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the resolution as presented with the change in language wording as noted He noted, if the motion w ere to fail, the next motion would be to table the application. Hurr asked if there was any time frame to which the hardcover restrictions would be limited. Gaffron said no time frame was set but it could be. Hurr said, if the motion were to pass, she would recommend a time frame be indicated Vote Ayes 2, Kelley, Jabbour; Nays 3, Goetten, Callahan, Hurr Motion failed Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to table the application to allow the applicant to consult with his attorney in respect to the denial action. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0 The application is tabled to the August 12 meeting of the Council. (#5) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SECOND AMENDED PLAN Laurie Lundeen and Mark Gronberg were present. Lundeen asked the Council members if they had been on the site. Goetten said she has been there but not actually walked it. Kelley said he had been there many times. Jabbour and Callahan have also visited the site. Mabusth reported that the applicant has provided an amended plan based on recommendations made by the Council The original plan proposed a private road with cul-de-sac, and the first amended plan proposed a configuration of private road with driveway outlet The second amended plan proposes a 30' wide driveway outlet to serve lots 1, 3, and 4 only. There are no lot width variances required with the amended plan. The owner of Outlet C, Ba>'v iew Farms, Second Addition, has been advised of the change. A private driveway for that subdivision would be intalled within outlets B and D. Callahan asked if the Staff had any problems with the proposal. Mabusth responded that the current proposal will not require lot standard variances. She also responded to a previous concern of the Council on why the Staff was so concerned with a road outlet being dedicated within this plat. Mabusth said the northeast access would serve as besty access for a future N/S through road This was the City's opportunity to plat sections of a future road when surrounding properties are developed Access from the west would benefit Waukman, as he too would be able to maintain views to lake and open space areas. Waukman was informed of this agenda item on the meeting and asked to attend if he had fiirther concerns. Jabbour asked how this applicant could be expected to carry forward with the needs of another development. Staff responded that this is the basis for planning for future needs. It is Staffs responsibility to address these issues. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 (#5 - #2136 Greenfield Coiporallon • Continued) Goetten noted that the proposal still results in the same lots. Jabbour thanked Goetten for insisting on no variances Goetten said she felt the proposal was still gerrymandered. She also noted that the Staft' memo did not address her concerns regarding the configuration of the lots, and it should have Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the six lot plat as amended per revised drawings dated July 12, 1996 by Mark S. Gronberg Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 1, Goetten. WTien asked, Lundeen said she was happy with the results as they were as they originated had wanted. (•#6) #2137 WILLUM DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE - DENIAL RESOLUTION #3743 Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt Resolution #3743 denying variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10 03, Subd. 14(C); 10.22, Subd. 1 & 2; 10.55; Subd. 8; and 10 56, Subd 16(L) - File #2137, William and Susan Dunkley, 2709 Walters Port Lane. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (»#7) #2148 WAYNE M. HOLMES & JACKIE DAHL, 1390 PARK DRIVE - VARL NCE - RESOLUTION #3744 Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Resolution #3744. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) MELANIE ROSE, 1020 BROWN ROAD NORTH - REQUEST TO WAIVE SURVEY REQUIREMENT The applicant was not present. Moorse said he has had discussions with the applicant. He reported that he asked Inspector Bruce Vang and Gaffron to visit the property to get an idea of the setbacks. The sketch from the contractor notes about a 63' setback from the north side. This was found to have been measured from the edge of the paved road. Moorse said, noting that there is a 60' right-of-way and assuming the road was located in the middle of the right- of-way, measuring 30' from center to define the lot line, it was determined that the setback to the proposed deck was 2-3' less than the required 50'. Moorse said he informed Rose she would probably need to reconfigure the deck to meet the setbacks or a variance would be required. In both scenarios, she was informed that at least a partial survey would be required. Rose had told Moorse she would do so but did not necessarily agree to do the survey. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 (US- Melanie Rose - Continued) Hurr asked that Staff continue the policy on requiring a survey. She said a survey was an investment that goes with a property. She did not agree with Staff being sent out to the properly and noted the necessity of a surv ey Goetten agreed. Jabbour said the applicant had made an incorrect assumption assuming that mortgage approval means the property is in 100^4 compliance with setbacks He asked that this be explained to the applicant. Callahan said he hesitated to deny the request without the presence of the applicant and suggested tabling the application with Moorse giving direction of the Council for a sense of the need for a survey Moorse clarified that even if a deck does meet the setback requirements, a survey w'ould still be required Callahan said if a survey requirement was not followed, it would present problems with other applicants as well. He noted that this was not the final decision but did suggest the survey be completed. Moorse said he would relay that it is the policy of the City to require a surv ey if he is asked. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to table agenda item #8 to the September meeting of the Council. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Goetten informed the Council of a request from Mary Butler to allow a property owner to add landscaping to a triangular piece of property owned by the City through tax forfeiture near Casco Avenue and Casco Point Road. She was asked to work through Gerhardson and the Park Commission. No City investment would be required. The property was said to be less than 1/3 acre All agreed it was an excellent idea. Hurr inquired about the status for receiving remuneration from the DNR for lost tax revenue from the Maxwell Bay Access. Callahan noted that the DNR said they would pay what is required by the legislature. Hurr said more than that amount could be paid. It was determined that the County is given a yearly amount and makes the decision on how that money is distributed. Jabbour noted that the law was written for rural properties so this may present a different situation Jabbour was also concerned for the DNR paying twice for the use. Moorse will find out w'hat amount could be paid and to whom; and how the City could obtain the major portion of this amount. Moorse was also asked to respond to a letter from the Putnam’s, whose property is across from the access location. The Putnams said they were not notified of any access being constructed. Kelley asked if they had voiced any objection but no one had spoken with them regarding the access prior to receipt of the letter. Jabbour asked Moorse to contact the Putnams and ask them to call Council members if they wish more information. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (Mayor/Council Report - Continued) Callahan referred to another letter received from Mr. Krogness to Gerhardson. .^rhardson Mid the concern was over driveway maintenance that extends into the right of-way . Callahan asked Gerhardson to inform Krogness of possible future changes Stubbs Bay Road. ®on labour said he had spoken with a resident. Dr. Glen Nelson, regarding problems with the c^le company not burying of cable lines on his property and asked Moorse to follow up. Mwrse said the cable company had informed him they were handling the situation but said he would follow up on it. O'' ‘>'ing considered for affordable housing prior lo CouncU ENGINEER REPORT Cook had no report CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#9) CONDEMNATION RESOLUTIONS TEMPORARY #3745 AND PERMANENT #3746- BIKE TRAIL Moorse reported that the resolutions were to gain authority to move forward with the acquisition of easements through the eminent domain process. Easements were identified of tteSfions recommended adoption Goetten said she had no problem with the resolutions but noted resolution 2 did not list Item #3 as shown on the first resolution. Kelley said it was his understanding that the design of the trail was going to be shown at this meeting Goetten said it was still agreed that the City would move forward with the eminent domain process. Hun- moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolutions #3745 and #3746, authorizing the tatang of land by eminent domain for trail purposes for the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail project at 2775 Silver View Drive and 2790 Silver View Drive. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22. 1996 (#9 - Bike Trail - Continued) Kelley said he had a problem with condemmng property without knowing exactly what will be built on the property in question and asked to see the physical plans Cook noted that the path was moved outward on the plans. On the Hile property, it will be necessary to be on the west side of the septic site. He noted if the trail is generally kept in the right- of-way, some of the trees can be saved and only a temporary easement would be required. This is not the case for the Brandenburg property. Cook said it would not matter which route was done as the trees would still need to be removed on the Brandenburg property. Moorse said he has been speaking with the Brandenburgs and they are understanding the trail placement. Moorse said the Hiles have a question r^arding drainage. It is Moorse’s intent to come to agreement with the Hiles or continue to move forward w ith the eminent domain process Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley. Callahan received confirmation from Barrett that he found the resolution satisfactory. (#10) STORM\\'ATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Moorse reported that at the recent work session, the Council discussed the need for a stormwater management plan The Council asked Staff to present a proposal, which has been updated by Bonestroo from its 1994 proposal. Chanhassen and Chaska were named as cities who have been well-satisfied with Bonestroo's work on their water management plans. Hurr asked if the cost includes taking the plan through the Met Council for adoption. Cook noted the line item regarding the adoption. Cook said this includes all agencies involved in the review process to include the Met Council, MCWD, and DNR. Jabbour inquired what has been spent already. It was clarified that $80,000 has been spent fijr the topography maps, and the additional $108,200 is to be spent on the plan. Kelley asked for clarification on the purpose of such a plan. Moorse noted a number of purposes to include the plan being a tool for planning and implementation of solutions to stormwater drainage problems. Moorse said the plan would model the stormwater flows and volumes, and planning can then be accomplished in a more automated manner. i_ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY^ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 {U\0 - Stormwater Management Plan - Continued) Kelley asked who would spend the money for the plan, the City or the developer. Moorse said the City would spend the money on planning the sub-watershed ponds beyond what is done by the developer. Kelley' asked for an example citing the Dickey property. Cook said the developer would have been charged a fee in addition to being asked to develop small ponds on their sites, which they laid out and paid for themselves. Kelley asked what the problem was with that solution Cook said it only reflects one site rather than being looked at in a comprehensive manner. Jabbour said the developer could have been asked to contribute to a master pond He noted that each neighborhood is different and possibly no pond would have been required on the i-roperty but a contribution made to another pond This could have resulted in nr.ft land being available for development also. Cook said the plan is in two parts: 1) volume of discharge and 2) water quality. Cook said it would be the intent of the plan to design a stormwater drainage system that addresses water quality. Cook noted it is difficult to address water quality improvement on an individual property basis. Callahan asked what can be done once small problems are identified on individual lots. Cook said the plan would show ponding sites and costs It would also look at undeveloped land to be used for ponding Callahan asked if tiie land would be taken and the owner charged for a pond. Cook said the land would be purchased He suggested this could be funded by a storm sewer trunk charge on new dev elopment and a stormwater utility fee on all properties in the City. Jabbour said the stormwater trunk charge would be similar to the Park Dedication Fund. Kelley noted the premise is that new development should not increase the velocity of stormwater drainage from the property. Cook said ponds would slow it down and be more efficient for all. Callahan asked if the City was being required by the Met Council to develop a stormwater plan. Gaffron said the City was under the obligation to the Met Council as well as the MCWD to complete the plan. Gaffron said the Staff is being hindered by the lack of such a plan. He cited day-to-day examples such as high water levels on Mooney Lake and the lack of data to identify stormwater elevations on the ponds A plan would enable the City to have a better handle on what is occurring within the City Highwood area was cited. Goetten asked if the low area created to catch water was doing its job. Gaffron said it does not catch all of the water from the neighborhood. Gerhardson said major repairs were done but it only works to its capacity. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (#10 - Stormwater Management Plan - Continued) Kelley said he w as concerned with the high cost of a comprehensive stormwater plan, and once it is completed, the need for still yet more detailed plans for each specific area. He voiced concern with identifying problems but offering no solutions. Goetten asked what the next step would be once the study was done Cook noted that other cities use their plans daily, and he believes Orono Staff w ill do likewise He said the plans give good information on what generally needs to be done Cook said it won't solve all the details and policies would have to be set Cook said the plan would not enable the Staff to understand requirements of each individual acre, but it w ould be able to take a larger tract of land, such as 20 acres, and know what is required Callahan asked what else would need to be known citing Mooney Lake as an example. Gaffron said if the water was pumped from a high level, the City would need to know where it will flow and what new problems would occur for downstream properties. Callahan asked what would happen then Gaffron said it would give the Watershed District or City Council a rational basis to decide on what to do and what physical and social impacts would be involved Gaffron said without such a plan, many hours of engineering time would have to be spent on each little project Goetten asked if it would be cost efl'ective. Gaffron said he believed it would be Moorse added that it would also enable the City to have a stronger position when dealing with other cities. Callahan said he was concerned that ether cities may not take the plan at its word. Jabbour said the comprehensive plan would give the City the ability to deal with a problem, educate the City, and pro-actively identify the major ponding areas. It was noted that the City was fire-fighting problems as they occur. It was visualized that the plan would identify subw’atershed ponding projects which could attract the MCWD to do projects to benefit the City. Jabbour commented that he would not want to see the pending sewer projects delayed because the City does not have a stormwater management plan Hurr asked to see a formula by w hich the City can recoup the costs involved. This would include not only new development but perhaps for an evaluation of existing problem areas Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the proposal as recommended. In discussing the cost of the plan, Moorse said the funds would be taken out of the funds designated toward stormwater management in the PIR Fund $58,200 additional was required. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (^10 - Stormwater Management Plan - Continued) Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1. Kelley. Kelley said he is in favor of the plan but is not satisfied with the explanations on how it will be put together and how it will serve the community. Kelley asked to see better presentations from the Staff on the pros and cons of spending such a large amount. Kelley said he would like to be sold on a proposal and does not see the benefit of this plan for all. Hurr asked whether bids were required to be taken Barrett said, because this is a professional service, a bid process is not required Jabbour noted as a point of infcrination that the City of Tonka Bay assesses for stormwater once a year. Callahan said he saw it as a problem tid ing to recoup costs Trom the citizens without further study. Jabbour asked what the status was on recouping the costs of the topographic mapping. Gaffron said the City recoups approximately $1000 per year. Kelley asked how long the plan would take to complete. Cook said it would take 9-10 niomhs. Gaffron said there will be a number of presentations throughout the project. He noted that establishing policies is an initial part of the plan process. Kelley asked about a contract with Bonestroo and penalties for not meeting deadlines Callahan questioned why we are going ahead to make a plan without having policies in place. Moorse noted the need for general policies on stormwater management as a basis fo how to do the rest of the study. Callahan responded that he had assumed the City already had such a policy. Moorse said there was a plan done on how the City generally wants stormwater managed from the comprehensive plan but a framework was neces.«!aiy. Callahan suggested the study be done in segments. Moorse said the study is broken down into segments. Hurr noted it would cost $6,700 for the first segment of the plan. Cook said the City would be able to stop the process at that point if they so desired. Kelley noted that Orono was different from other cities and have taken stormwater runoff beyond what other cities have done Jabbour added that the process will take that uniqueness and apply it to the textbook city with the City's philosophy to come up with the plan Jabbour indicated, in his opinion, the City has not done much individual!'/ to deal with stormwater but has placed great burdens on its property owners by having them adhere to such strict standards. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 (#11) SCHEDULE 1997 BUDGET WORK SESSION Budget work sessions were scheduled for Tuesdays, August 6 and August 13 at 8:00 a.m. (*#12) REPLACEMENT OF SANDER - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the purchase of one sander from Aspen Equipment Co. for one dual spinner sander for an amount of $2,189. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) DONATION OF CAR FOR DARE PROGRAM USE Moorse reported that a part-time police officer has offered the use of his classic car to promote the DARE program. This would be similar to what other cities have done with using the car to promote interest in the program by kids. Callahan asked Moorse to contact the City’s insurance agent regarding this use after granting permission for the use and e.xpressing his appreciation of Officer Carlson's donation Hurr asked if Officer Carlson would be using the vehicle while on duty and how this affected the liability issue. Moorse said the car title would remain in Carlson's name. He added that other officers may be the drivers of the car. (#14) TRANSFER OF GENERAL FUND RESERVES TO THE PIR FUND Moorse reported that this item is the transfer of reserves from the general fund to the PIR fund as previously discussed in Item #10 for the general stormwater plan and projects. Kelley noted that the General Fund reserve at the end of 1995 was over one million dollars He asked if IC/o of the reserve is moved into the PIR Fund, and another 25% is to be taken to purchase the "library" property, will there be sufficient reserves remaining? Moorse indicated in the affirmative. Kelley asked, out of the general fund reserve, how much was designated and could not be touched Jabbour said these funds could always be touched. Moorse clarified that $ 1 50,000 was designated for vacation and sick leave, $950,000 for working capital, $100,000 for HACA, and $100,000 for contract revenue loss. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 (#14 - Transfer of General Fund Reserv es to the PIR Fund - Continued) Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the transfer of $100,000 of reserves from the General Fund to the PIR Fund, with $50,000 designated toward a Stormwater Management Plan and $50,000 designated toward infrastructure improvements (stormwater drainage projects); and approving a budget adjustment to reflect the $100,000 expenditure in the General Fund, and the $100,000 revenue increase in the PIR Fund The motion also confirms the designation of $100,000 of the General Fund Reserves as a HACA revenue reduction contingency and $100,000 as a contract revenue reduction contingency. Vote Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley. CITY' ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett had no report. (•#15) LICENSES Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the following license: Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Garbage & Refuse Collector R&WRoII-OfrService, Inc. 5525 County Road 50 Carver, MN (•#16) BILLS Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p m. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk w III fa 8 \\1o* ^03so3 ^(Q Q 3 3a SfsP It O " ? \| K 8 O 8i C^'s ^ LflaAi ‘fj 3 ?D) 2fei MHfll M •w t Ul*! ^ 5 3 Li \ n 1 \'I 9 (2 '£ 8 i-l I^SiS / —M. *l*?*4\ 7 V. f .4?' \] »«>«\ ft II V* »— i-» (j I— I— »— ^ > > O ^ 5d po > 5d *c c ^ m n» o.u> v» ^ <-•»-* I Q ^ t- pd b; H S? ^ O. 2; t? 5* > § n.►- 2 lo vO C OO VO 5? 3 3s g- ?■" Ei 5 n-3 =. O o W c/5 Dr-» rc »-t ft.o ^ ® po (w* 5 os 4^ U» :it :tt N) lO N> tv) 3 OO ►:* S 50o ° 33 S- fi 3<5 ¥<§; > S/-> K 3^ •*: O • ^ P3 ►-*orr 5 g s-'i >O- 2. pp o n n ft 2 Cft ^ (JQ 1-^ o:k (/)m r K* 5a g, ?r G. ft —*-i »-* ft ft 2 H Sr B Cf ft to ft ft:r. ^.g g 2.5 >Om Xo goej n O ft ^ Bftj ft o n n P^ 5. tsi lO H— VO >dered to be Item" on il et - located§ « 3 S-n'S 5 "3sp B."o w -. 5 f» 5 2^ *- ft r:* 5 3 ° O Q* •-• w» rt 6 2 ^ «.2 B ifi p> n•^* r^(IQ p. ft P Q - O. COQ P iC. 2 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION j DATE: Augus^fr^e ITEM NO.-7 Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2153 Ben Young. 3105 Sixth Avenue North - Variances - Resolution Zoning District:RR-IB (Property located within Shoreland District, 500-1,000 feet of Lake Classen) Total lot area = 3.92 acres Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated July 10, 1996 for more background and detail on this review. Applicant has filed for a setback variance that would allow an oversized accessory structure at 1,260 s.f to be placed 15' in front of the front line of the existing residence located 86’ from the front'street lot line. The 3.92 acre property would be allowed a 1,600 s.f. oversized accessory structure. The property would also be allowed a total of 3,200 s.f. of accessory structure area. Applicant proposes a total of 1,740 s.f No other variances are required. Applicant's hardships are listed on Page 2 of the staff memo of July 10, 1996. The Planning Commission members found the hardships valid and unanimously approved the variance application as proposed. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. rS> A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D) FILE NO. 2153 WHEREAS, Benedict E. Young (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3105 Sixth Avenue North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit construction of a 1,260 s.f. oversized accessory structure to be placed 15' in front of the principal structure where no such encroachment is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2153. 2.The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Single Family Zoning District requiring two acres of dry buildable land. The property is also located within 1,000’ of the shoreline of Classen Lake and subject to the Shoreland Regulations of the City. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1996 and recommended approval of the variance as proposed, based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Topography begins to drop off to the east and south of the residence. Placement of the structure at proposed site will limit the need for filling. Page 1 of 5 4. 5. B. C. D. F. llie placement of structure wll minimize impact on propert>’ by utilizing existing drive that currently serves residence. The location of landscs^d areas or formal gardens in the west and north yards as view windows of house are oriented to west, north and south views. Location of septic system in the south yard and need to preserve gentle sloped areas for future septic needs. E. Location of septic tanks at east side of residence. Based on the topography and existing plantings within front street yard, there is no visual impact of structure upon views from public roadway nor on views of adjacent residences. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan nf the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings or hardships, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the construction of a 1,260 s.f. oversized accessory' structure to be placed 15 ’ in front of the front line of the principal structure, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 % 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The exterior of the structure shall be completed of lap siding and painted of the same color as the principal structure. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an updated survey locating accessory structure on property. Applicant shall direct surveyor to stake structure on site prior to contractor excavating for footings. Per ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (3), applicant shall execute a covenant with the City setting forth limitations on the future use of structure should property be subdivided in the future. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 12, 1997). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of August^ 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 ol D STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(c) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the Northwest quar er of the Southwest quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest c’uarter distant 371.31 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence North parallel with the West line of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter a distance of 277.3 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of County Highway No. 6, which point is 371.31 feet East at right angles from the West line of said Northvrest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence Northeasterly along said centerline 554.4 feet more or less to a point on said centerline distant 200.8 feet njeasured along said centerline Southwesterly from a point on said centerline 187.7 feet West at right angles from the East line of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence South parallel with said East line to a point on said South line 384.2 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence West along said South line 546.17 feet more or less to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement for road purposes for hennepin County Highway No. 6. NOv ^^ e TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mooise, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:July 10, 1996 SUBJECT: #2153 Ben Young, 3105 6th Avenue North - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB (Review Exhibit B, portions of property located within Shoreland area of Classen Lake, 500-1,000'). Total lot area = 3.92 acres Application: Applicant proposes construction of an oversized accessory structure to be located 15' in front of the front line of the principal structure. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9(C-2) A. Maximum allowed individual oversized accessor}' structure for 3.51 to 4 acres property. Allowed = 1,600 s.f. Proposed = 1,260 s.f. No variance required. B.Total of all accessory structures allowed on property for 3.51 to 4 acres property. Allowed = 3,200 s.f Proposed = 1,740 s.f (1,260+480) No variance required. Section 10.03, Subd. 9(C-3) - Required setbacks for all oversized accessory structures. The RR-IB zoning district requires a 50' front and rear and 30' side. Proposed structure meets all principal structure setbacks. Sect on 10.03, Subd. 9(D) - Setback variance required for accessory structure placed in front of tront line of principal structure. Allowed = 0 Proposed = 15'. 4.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Area 500-1,000' = 170,360 s.f Allowed = 59,626 s.f or 35% Hardcover is not of issue nor is structural coverage as lot exceeds 1.99 acres. Zoning File #2153 July 10, 1996 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property ONVTiers List D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Form E - Survey F - Topographic Map G - Elevation/Floor Plan H - Septic Map Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a setback variance to construct an oversized accessory structure and place it 15' in front of the front line of the principal structure. Structure does not exceed the maximum allowed area for an individual oversized accessory structure on the 3.9 acre lot. Structure will meet all required principal structure setbacks for the RR-IB zoning district. Review Exhibit G, the accessory structure will be at a maximum height of 14 1/2' and will not exceed the height of the principal structure nor exceed the maximum allowed height of 30’. The City has received no negative comments trom the neighbors notified of applicant s variance application (review Exhibit D). Statement of Hardship Review Exhibit A, hardships are reviewed as follows: 1. Applicant notes structure will be placed in a area where elevations are flat as topography begins to drop off to the east and south of the site. Review Exhibit F, note elevations drop towards drainageway that drains from north side of County 6 south through the property. The drainageway flows southward eventually to Classen Lake. 2. Minimize impact on property by utilizing drive that currently serves residence. 3. 4. Location of landscape areas in west and north yards as house is oriented to west, north and south views. Location of septic system in south yard and need to preserve gentle slope areas for future septic needs. Zoning File #2153 July 10, 1996 Page 3 hsues for Consideration 1. Can structure be relocated on property and meet required setback? 2. Will structure have a negative impact on the pattern of development along 6th Avenue North? 3.How shall impact of oversized accessory structure be softened or minimized? A. Color of structure? B. Need for landscaping? C. Other? Options of Action To deny, approve as proposed or approve as amended. Applicant to be advised that upon application for a building permit, applicant shall be required to provide an updated survey locating accessor>' structure on property and structure shall be staked by surveyor before building permit can be issued. The building official has advised that as structure exceeds 1,000 s.f. and cannot be placed on a floating slab that footings will be required to penetrate fill in order to reach virgin soil strata. J Application # Date ReceiTed f Amount Paid ^ i CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORiVLATION Site Address Zti AiJ Property Identification Number (T.I.D.) aT-//5 03 3^ coo.7 ------------------------ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired 16^' ------------------------------(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ___residential ___^other (specify). Zoning District:_____________________________________ APPLICANT Name a C • ^ Phone (home) Phone (work)______*/>/ - S g 7y_ Address: ? ^r^City: levf. /~^ie Zip: _££J£Jt — OWTsTR (if different than applicant) Name___________________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ .Address:Citv:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost %__SA£1. Describe request in detail:X vf* (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage X Setback: \ Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: -TAc___$jCsA±------c£—"Iks.—--------- fi ^ d ____J±je._____5 r/>1U ---------^ O ^ t\ ^11\y- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application dtad1»n<? daftJll order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property 0\Miers List of o^\•ners \%ithin 150’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Go\l Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as reouired. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11” for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (I) copy SV2' x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the propern-. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vfiitt vr.riance aoplicafion is not complete if the above inforination_lm5L.imLJi£cn APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all infomiation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. iJdarc DateApplicant's Signature I OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authonzes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council mernbers for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plaiming Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, ple^e make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building &. Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 RUN DATE 06/2<^/96 BATCH 509 APROP AOOR OHNER HAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR OltCR HAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 28-118-23 32 000603185 SIXTH AVE N HENRY 8 BRANTINGHAH ET AL HENRY < NANCY BRANTINGHAH 3185 CO RO NO 6 LONG LAKE m 55356 38 28-118-23 32 0013 03180 SIXTH AVE N HENN CO PARK RESERVE OIST HENN CO PARK RESERVE OIST 3800 CO RO NO 26 HAPLE PLAIN 55359 38 28-118-23 33 0009 00038 AOORESS UTUSSIGNEO JAT«S R 6RABEK ET AL JANES R 6RABEK 3050 JAMESTOHN RO LONG LAKE rt4 55356 HENNEPIN COWfTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWiERS LIST38 28-118-23 32 000703105 SIXTH AVE N B A 0 YOUNGBENEOICT E A OENISE E YOUNG 3105 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE m 55356 38 28-118-23 32 0015 03050 SIXTH AVE N H L KEZAR ANA NCOONALO MITCHELL L KEZAR 3050 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0016 03175 JAHESTONN RO MICHAEL AMES A LAUREL AFCS MICHAEL A LAUREL ANES 3175 JAMESTOHN ROAO ORONO MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 509 00009 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 2738 28-118-23 32 000803065 SIXTH AVE N JAB RYOERJOHN 0 A BARBARA V RYOER3065 6TH AVE NLONG LAKE m 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0008 03065 JAMESTOHN RO J P A S K KOOB JOHN P A SUSAI«« R KOOB 3065 JAMEST09OI RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0015 03050 JAMESTOHN RO J R 6RABEK A P J GRABEK JAMES R A PENELOPE J GRABEK 3050 JAMESTOHN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 .-L- 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOC I (we) Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form i&S ^ of 3oCo j Atvte^roa^o [print name(s)][print address have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 310^ Am?. iJ . also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. 1 (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Property OwTier Date ^,^0^n^^m***i*m*** ********************>*****************^************************* I (we) ^ of J>0^T ^O^UL— [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the propert)' located at S ^0^ AiAri/O • also referred to as Land Use Application No.________.. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Cj '<^0 - ^ Date Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. / \X - )_» s__ o _ (/I — - —m_ D i-M *w <»■5_ni o $fn 3dE • • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION X DATE: August 2, ^ ITEM NO.: \ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2131 Larr>- Karkela, 4149 Highwood Road Resolution - After-the-Fact Variances - Zoning District:LR-IB Total lot area = 10,374 s.f. Additional Exhibits L - Applicant ’s Addendum M - Applicant's Amended Plan Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated July 9, 1996 for more detail on this review. The applicant has filed an after-the-fact variance application for an upper le\el deck at the lakeside of the residence. Construction was commenced and halted by the City in the fall of 1993. The application involves an average lakeshore setback, structural coverage and hardcover variances within the 75-250' setback area if deck is to be completed. Applicant explained that the 3 ’ wide walkway deck at the upper level adjacent to applicant's kitchen/dining/living room area is too small to allow for an outdoor dining area. 11.5 s.f. of the upper level deck extends over grassed area creating new hardcover where excess hardcover already exists in the 75-250 ’ setback area. The upper level deck at 65.5 s.f also adds to total structural coverage where 20.3% exists. Planning Commission members asked for reductions in lower level deek area to -ffset increases of structural coverage from the upper level deck improvement. Applicant noted location of existing support columns, refer to Exhibit M, and his desire to eliminate need to alter support structure. Planning Commission members asked that the lower level deck be reduced by 50 s.f Applicant has provided his amended proposal. Exhibit M, calling for the removal of some 50.6 s.f of lower level deck. Removals will have no impact on the existing support structure. Staff has completed a second inspection of the deck and noted that plastic underliner exists beneath the lower level deck. If we are to achieve hardcover reductions, plastic underliner must also be removed. Applicant's amended plan calls for the following variances; 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Structural coverage. Total lot area = 10,449.4 s.f Allowed = 1,567.4 s.f or 15% Existing = 2,123 s.f. or 20.3% Proposed = 2,137.9 s.f or 20.4% (original 2,188.5 s.f or 20.9%) Structural coverage increase = 14.9 s.f, or 0.1% (original 65.5 s.f. or 0.6^) Request for Council Action continued Page 2 August 5, 1996 Zoning File #2131 Larr>- Karkela, 4149 Highwood Road - After-the-Fact Variances 2.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Average lakcshore setback variance. AlloA^'cd - O' Existing lower level deck is located 31.6’ beyond average lakeshore setback line. Proposed upper level deck encroaches average lakeshore setback line by 21'. No change from original proposal. 3.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover variance within 75-250’ setback area. Total area = 6,924 s.f. Allowed = 1,731 s.f or 25% Existing = 2,882.8 s.f or 41.6% Proposed = 2,843.7 s.f. or 41% Hardcover decrease = 39.1 s.f or 0.6% Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application (5 t nay), subject to the following conditions; 1.Applicant to obtain a penalty building permit. Applicant ti .ontact Building Official to determine what type of information will be needed to complete the filing of the building permit application. 2.All required hardcover improvements (deck structure/plastic underliner to be removed prior to the framing inspection by Building Inspector). The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2 FILE NO. 2131 WHEREAS, Larry W. Karkela (hereinafter "the applicant") is the ON\Tier of the property located at 4149 Highwood Road wthin the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows; Lot 22, Highwood, "Lake Minnetonka" Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and Section 10.22, Subdivisions I (B) and 2 to allow applicant to complete construction of an upper level deck placed at the lakeside of the residence to be located 21' in front of the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed, the improvement will result in an increase of 14.9 s.f. or 0.1% increase of structural coverage where 20.3% exists and where 20.4% is proposed and where 15% is allowed and the improvement will result in a reduction of 39.1 s.f. or 0.6% hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area where 2,882.8 s.f. or 41.6% exists and where 2,843.7 s.f. or 41% is prop>osed and where the Code would allow ’ 25%. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application w’as reviewed as Zoning File #2131. 2.The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 10,374 s.f. Page 1 of 5 . . . . , -IT MTll J 3. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1996 and recommended approval of the variance application as amended based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. The existing topography and location of mature plantings minimize the visual impact of the upper level deck on the views of the adjacent residence. B.The City has received written confirmation that the adjacent residents at the east and west side of the property have no problem with the proposed improvement and encourage the Council to approval applicant's deck. 3' upper level walkway deck does not provide adequate room for an outdoor dining area adjacent to upper level kitchen/ dining/living room patio doors. The proposed improvement will result in a reduction of 0.6% hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to othei property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessaiy to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 • ft CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above that would pemit the completion of the construction of an upper level deck and grants a structural coverage increase of 14.9 s.f. or 0.1%, and hardcover variance of 1,276.3 s.t. or 18.4% and a 21 ’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall obtain a penalty building permit before proceeding with construction on unfinished deck. Applicant to contact Building Official to determine what type of information will be needed to complete the filing of the building permit application. 2. Existing hardcover improvements consisting ol 50.6 s.f. of lower level deck and plastic underliner beneath deck to be removed prior to the framing inspection by the Building Inspector. 3. 4. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 12. 1997). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) e: .*cuted the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 To;Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1996 #2131 Larry Karkela, 4149 Highvvood Road - After-the-Fact Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District:LR-IB Total lot area = 10,449.4 s.f. Application: Applicant has filed an after-the-fact variance application involving an average lakeshore setback, structural coverage and hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area to permit completing construction of an upper level deck at the lakeside of the residence. Staff discovered the deck being constructed in the fall of 1993. The deck has yet to be completed as stall issued a Stop Work Order until the appropriate variances were approved. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Structural coverage variance. (Note: All deck areas located 6' above grade with a railing are included in structural coverage inventory.) Total lot area = 10,449.4 s.f. Allowed = 1,567.4 s.f or 15% Existing = 2,123 s.f or 20.3% Proposed = 2,188.5 s.f or 20.9% Structural coverage increase = 65.5 s.f or 0.6% 2.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance. Allowed = 0 s.f Existing lower level deck is located 31.6’ beyond the average lakeshore setback line. Proposed upper level deck encroaches average lakeshore setback line by 21*. 3.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area. Total area = 6,924 s.f Allowed = 1,731 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,882.8 s.f or 41.6% Proposed = 2.894.3 s.f or 41.8% Hardcover increase =11.5 s.f or 0.16% Zoning #2131 July 9, 1996 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List D - Neighbors' Acknowledgement Form E-1-2 Adjacent Neighbors' Approval Letters F - Floor Plan-Location of Additional Hardcover from Upper Level Deck Floor Plan-Upper Level Deck ■ Survey • Hardcover Inventory 75-250' Setback Area • Average Lakeshore Setback Site Plan G H I J K-1-4 Staff Letters to Applicant Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of variances that would allow an upper level deck at 65.5 s.f. installed at the lakeside of the residence. The majority of the structure is located over a lower level deck. Refer to Exhibits F, G and H, the improvement results in an 11.5 s.f. increase of hardcover where excesses of hardcover exist within the 75-250' setback area. ITie entire upper level deck area is credited as structural coverage against the property. Review Exhibit J, the proposed deck w ill be located 21' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The existing lower level deck encroaches the setback line by 31.6'. The upper level deck appears to have little impact upon the lakeshore views of the adjacent residents. Review Exhibits D and E, the neighbors are aware of the proposed improvement and have submitted letters of approval. Review Exhibit F, applicant offers removal of existing hardcover improvements to offset the 11.5 s.f increase. He proposes reduction in gravel drive/parking area or comers of lower deck. In 1984, applicant received variance approval for construction of the new two story garage and decks at lakeside of residence. Applicant applied for building permits for all improvements. Review Exhibits K-1-4, applicant was first advised of the violation in October of 1993. The after-the-fact variance application was filed in April of 1996. The survey submitted with the application was found to be inadequate. Applicant was required to provide an updated survey and hardcover inventory for the variance review. i ■ Zoning #2131 July 9, 1996 Page 3 Statement of Hardships Refer to Exhibit A. applicant notes lower level deck is not useable ... the upper level 4' wide walkway deck, originally approved in 1984. connected the patio doors from the kitchen/dining area to upper deck. Applicant notes the inability to have a table for informal dining immediately adjacent to upper level kitchen. Applicant's immediate neighbors note no problem with the proposed deck and recommended that the City approve the variances as proposed. Issues for Consideration 1.Applicant has agreed to remove 11.5 s.f of existing hardcover to offset increase from upper level deck. What of 65.5 s.f of additional structural coverage improvements? Should 65.5 s.f of structural improvements also be removed to offset the structural coverage increase? 2.What does applicant mean by lower level deck not being useable? Should lower level deck be reduced in area to minimize hardcover and reduce average lakeshore setback encroachment? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. Options of Action To either deny, approve or approve as amended. If application is denied. Planning Commission must recommend a deadline date for the removal of the upper level deck. If approved, the following conditions should be included: 1.Applicant to obtain a penalty' building permit. Applicant to contact Building Official to determine what type of information will be needed to complete the filing of the building permit application. 2.All required hardcover, structural and/or non-structural removals to be completed prior to the framing inspection by Building Inspector. I CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION c- 11 Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 fi After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Tj; PROPERTY INFORMATION “ * ' Site Address \-V \ C sa V vx >co _o__ MAR 2 5 1996 V.\ 4.H * • 3 i . P ■n >1 XI •• *. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)____O ~ i ^ H ^ ^------- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ------------------------(month/year) m V ^ r — I —^--------------------------------------------- I (do)(Tdo not)>lso own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property': ^ residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:^_________________________________ APPLICANT jqajjje \‘CAt2.^<>'^L-A ____ Phone (work)____3L?r^ ^ *^-1 Address: otVM^ \-^ City ’:_ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ________________ Phone(home) Phone (work) I Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: The e y v ^^ ————————— .Tw A fe>' X it>'~ ADPino^.- Aw \s Agovt^ A>-J (attach additional sheets if necessary) /Qr w A u»c - r ' /VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty^r unusu^ property conditions preveji^g compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ’ -----\«-»r T- AV=S\..^ 1 V»tx^ <4rr>n>;Tto -> > V\SS> (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUB\nTTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. ___Completed Application Form 2. 3. 4. ~ Certified Propercy Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Count} Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map foutained with property owners list). Cenificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur>*j}oi) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (D copy SVi" x 11" for reproduction. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. t J l\ Topographic surv-ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11" for reproduction. ^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'^" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ___Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yfiur variance application is not complete if the above information has not beenjncluded. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to tlie best of his/her knowledge. Date OWNER’S SIGNATUTIE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on ±e third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Budding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 ftUN DATE 03/0a/H SATCH 504PHOO AOOK (MCR NAME TAXPAYER NATC/AODR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNfORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE ISSO 07-117-2S 44 0015 04109 HIGHNOOO RO GEORGE H APPLEOAUM GEORGE APPLEOAUM 4109 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND MN 55SA4 SO 07-117-2S 44 0010 04149 HIGHNOm RO LARRY N KARKELA LARRY H KARKELA 4149 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND m S5S64 SO 07-117-2S 44 0019 04154 HIGHNOOO RO FRANCES N NILSON JOHN F TESAR 4154 HIGHHrrV, RO R 1 MOUND MN a5S44 SO 07-117-2S 44 0020 04147 HIGHNOOO RO MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSai 4175 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND MN 55S44 SO 07-117-2S 44 0021 0<*17S HIGHNOOO RO MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND M4 55344 SO 07-117-23 44 0022 04195 HIGHNOOO RO M A FINNEY A S J FINNEY MARK A SARA FINNEY 4195 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND M4 55344 • 'I *, K J SO 07-117-2S 44 0027 04144 HIGW«X)0 RO HAL OEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA OEVAAN 17405 SUSAN DR MIMCTONKA MN 55345 V • • > V 30 07-117-23 44 0028 04150 HIGHNOOO RO TONI 0 GRANOSTRANO TONI 0 GRANOSTRANO 4150 HIGHNOOO RO ORONO m 55344 SO 07-117-2S 44 0029 04140 HIGMKXIO RO JANET L EIDE JANET L ElOE 4140 HI61M000 RO MOUND Ml 55344 '.•/rJb so oy >117-23 44 0030 04140 HIGHNOOO RO J 0 CUSACK ACM GRACE C GRACE A J CUSACK 4140 HIGHNOOO RO MOUND MN 55364 SO 07-117-23 44 0031 04132 HIGHNOOO RD SCOTT G A CATHERINE AflDERSON SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON 4132 HIGHNOOO ROAD MOUND m 55344 SO 07-117-2S 44 04125 HIGHNOOO JOHN N A ROBERTA JOHN N A ROBERTA 4125 HIGIOnoO RO ORONO MN 55344 0004 RO J HENRICH J HENRICH l'u so 07-117-2S 44 0007 04114 HIGHNOOO RD PHILLIP M OTTO PHILLIP OTTO 19050 STRATFORD RD B209 MIMIETOMCA MN 55345 TOTAL BATCH 504 OOOIS Cb 4 RUN DATE OS/Oa/M HEftSPIN COUNTY PROPCRTV INFORMATION SVSflN PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPt»T NO. PX4S54Q1 PASSSATCH 504 / va 1-. .V v|f - ».■ 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE REST OF HY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. )■ -DATE i Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgeiiient Foiin >4* j ’ k ^—r« I (we) [print naiiie(s)] » of HIXS [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understend that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare appro' 4* »» disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we; am (are) aware of the improvemm: plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. VfopcnyOwTicr Date Property Owner I^^te vOC-ir*! i-O (st'.c , I [print name(s)J [print address] I (W( have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property ’ or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the irr;provement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Prope»Ty Owner 5 • ;lz ^ Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to the scheduled meeting date. i t \ n^-' t » •r*.' r - March 22.1996 — ;if 4 • - To: Members of the Orono Citv Council and Staff Re Variance Application of Larrv' Karkela. 4149 Highwood Rd. We the undersigned are neighbors on either side of the subject property and wish to show our support for the appro\ al of the above variance application to allow the expansion of the deck at I st floor level We recommend that the variaiKe application be approved, as it does not adversely affect our properties / k.' 1 A-' March 22,1996 To Members of the Orono Citv Council and Staff Re Vanancc Applrcation of Larr>- Karkela, 4140 Hlghwood Rd We the undersigned are neighbors on either side of the subject property and wish to show our support for the approval of the above variarKe application to allow the expansion of the decK at 1 st floor level We recommend that the \ariance application be approved, as it does not adversely affect our properties Address . /? -1 // hyiLCc \> I i ^■'Cj Lyj Address I '4.3--k AppmbKi-Ac.- sr ms-C. t^w^y PA**?!!^HhJv o_<iI'Cb*>^^i -OF Up v»J« R t> B^^:;_ 1* X ■* ______ K^K€.CV~ ~C>esi-<^ •” ‘: Oo oTu-e; .. I o APC> JT-vOk J > \ W’ s/ Vo<«*T" ^i_oo« D©0^ ■; £>N lV M? - • •• "I / 4- zo- >lj ■illl .J #• **•tr>.>, \: ?. }/ I... .,, . L ! •— i \q-«V » i.-. 'i*... f 1 f / \ ^ 1 /• > ' V f //// / f f y r"22.3 ^ ^ ^ A Scale 1" = 20 Lot area = 10,449.4 Sq. Pt or 0.24 Acres Denotes Iron marker found Bearintjs shown are to an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super™ vision, and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State Of Minnesota. Barton G. Ahrens Minnesota License Number 19162 Kxifitinq Legal Descripticn Lot 22, "Hiqhwood, Lake Minnetonka". Hennepin County, Minnesota. This survey shows the location of all existing buildings and visible "hard­ cover'* in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improve­ ments or encroachments. \ r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250’25-500* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONK A. House Leoffti Widtb X X X B. Garage ^^3 C. Driveway -7 C X X , r. S" z 1 / I ’V D. Sidewalk / X X / 7 3i I . 7 • f E. Pacio/Deck c, > a. X X W '7 F- Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic 11. V y X X X \p^l “ F G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B /r ^ 2- V a 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ___ X L^ngih Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk i X 7 ■ E. Patio/Deck ■t .•»»0 -X X 500-1000’ F. Landscape Underlain By Plasitc X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 1 " 7V^1_ B •r n’-f X 100 /3 2. 0. 7 s.F. SF. S.F. S.F. s.F. s.F. S.F,■2-0 Z 'J3 ‘. ^ ZO. 0 S.F S F n.'j y 70 7 S F S.F. / . 0 S.F. SF. S.F. S.F, V S.F. / /. t ^2, / S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. n. r S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Z^:7‘/3 s.F. s.F. %W7l 7 0^3 . A R A B IK V I \\ ~7 Ar EXISTUIG house r-) • * 6-V. / Lot area = 10,449.4 Sq, Ft. or 0,24 Acres • : Denotes Iron marker found Bearings shown are to an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this survey •. was prepared by me or under my direct super­ vision, and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9(o Barton G. Ahrens Minnesota License Number 191G2 Existing Legal Description Lot 22, "Highwood, Lake Minnetonka". Hennepin County, Minnesota. This survey shows tne location of all existing buildings and visible "hard­ cover" xn relation to the boundaries of the aoove described property. It docs not purport to show any other improve­ ments or cncroachmentj;. o o// ( February ’ 23, 1996 CITYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mainni Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 Mr. Larry Karkela 4149 High wood Road Mound. Minnesota 55364 Re: Deck Construction Dear Mr. Karkela: On December 15, 1993 this office notified you of the requirement for a buildiiig permit for a deck you were constructing on your property. On December 20, 1?93 you submitted an after the fact permit application. A review was completed and the proposed deck addition was found to be encroaching the average lakcshore setback. A letter was -ent to you on March 1, 1994 notifying you of this problem. Work on the deck was halted and it remained unfinished until recently when it was completed. Enclosed is Citation #3960486011 citing you for working without a permit. The City must now require you to remove the deck or if you feel you have a hardship, apply for an after the fact variance to see if the City Council could allow it to remain. A deadiine of March 11, 1995 has been established for removal or application submittal. If tliis deadline is not met, the Cits will forward the matter to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official Enc. cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Tv-Iephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-<^10 > ‘ / CITYof ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 March 1, 1994 Mr. Larry Karkela 4149 Highwood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Deck Construction Dear Mr. Karkela: The City has received and reviewed your application for a building permit for the deck alteration you’ve begun on your property. In looking at surveys of properties on either side of yours, it is clear that your deck addition is encroaching the average lakeshore setback. Although it is above an existing deck, it is required to meet setbacks. You can remove the deck or if you feel you can demonstrate a hardship, you may ask City Council for a variance to the code. Please advise the City of your decision by March 8, 1994. If you have any questions or if I can assist you in anyway, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, O Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc:Jeamie A. M.-ou th, Building & Zoning Adm. Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 1 CITY of ORONO Municipal Oflices Street Address; 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 December 15, 1993 Mr. Larry Karkela 4149 Highwood Road Mound. Minnesota 55364 Re: Work without Building Permit Dear Mr. Karkela: On October 13. 1993 this office informed you that a building permit was required for a deck you are constructing on your property at 4149 Highwood Road. As of this date, the deck has not been removed and a building permit has not been issued. This letter is to require you to remove the deck or apply for a building permit to complete work before December 29, 1993. If this deadline is not met. the City will issue citations and refer the matter to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 rrTi CITY of ORONO Municipal Ofllces Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-C066 October 13, 1993 Mr. Larry Karkela 4149 Highwood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Work without Permit Dear Mr. Karkela: It has come to the attention of this department that you are in the process of constructing a deck on your property at 4149 Highwood Road. As you know, permits are required for deck construction in the City of Orono. This letter is to require you to stop work on the deck immediately and to remove the structure or apply for a building permit before October 25, 1993. If this deadline is not met, the City may issue citations. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Larry W. Karkela 4149 Highwood Road Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: DATE OF MEETING: 7/15/96 ZONING FILE #2131 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: July 23, 1996 COPIES TO; After-the-F act-V ariances VOTE:5 FOR 1 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the foilowing: Planning Commission recommended approval of the after-the-fact variance application subject to applicant providing an amended plan showing removal of some 65.5 s.f of structural improvements to offset structural coverage increase within installation of expanded second level deck. The amended plan should be submitted no later than Wednesday, July 31st (before noon) to ensure scheduling on the Council agenda of August 12, 1996. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357) if you have any questions pertaining to the directives of the Planning Commission or the status of your variance application. "3T^»^N.ilOE5-j f=r \-HtH. (pos-rsj) Vv«F.^vrc- Vo^.^ JUL 3 0 j:V:;n REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^(/Q DATE; AuJtJ8v^l996*^% *%>ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gafiron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoninc Item Description: #2134 Rob Albrecht, 1810 Shad>"wood Road - After-the-Fact Variances Denial Resolution List of Eihibits A - Denial Resolution - Notice of Council Action 7/25/96 - August 8, 1996 Letter from Applicant's Attorney - Council Minutes 7/22/96 Memo and Exhibits of 7/17/96 Including Revised Draft Approval Resolution Site Plan (Exhibit A of "^'2/96) B C D E F Discussion This item was granted conceptual approval by the Council at the July 8 meeting on a vote of 3 to I. When the approval resolution was presented for Council adoption on July 22, Council's motion to adopt the resolution failed on a vote of 2 to 3. The item was then tabled on a vote of 5 to 0 in order that applicant consult with his attorney on this change of direction by the Council. In attempting to anticipate the possible actions Council may wish to take on this application, a draft denial resolution and the previously presented approval resolution with language added regarding Council's intent are enclosed with this packet. The applicant ’s attorney has submitted an additional letter (Exhibit requesting Council's reconsideration of various facets of this application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt one of the attached resolutions as drafted or with revisions you may specify. Isv i 1* . N A V 1 f ) A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) FILE #2134 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Robert and Tara Albrecht (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1810 Shady wood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 22, Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for after-the-fact variances to permit the construction of a deck located within the 75-250' setback zone constituting an additional 165 s.f. of hardcover when hardcover in the 75-250’ zone already exceeds the 25% limit; and WHEREAS, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1996 and a revised proposal on June 17, 1996 and at that June 17 meeting voted 3 in favor, 4 against on a motion to recommend approval of the requested variances; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and their attorney, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community, at the regular Council meeting of July 8, 1996 and voted 3 to 1 to conceptually approve the requested hardcover variance subject to specific conditions, and directed City staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the July 22, 1996 Council meeting; and Page 1 of 5 WHEREAS, on July 22, 1996, all five City Councilmembers were present and a motion to adopt the approval resolution failed on a vote of 2 ayes, and 3 nays; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently voted 5 to 0 to table the application in order that applicant be granted an opportunity to consult with his attorney on this change of direction by the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council on August 12, 1996 again reviewed the application and the comments by the applicant and applicant's attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the variance application described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS 1.The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District and has an area of approximately 18,000 s.f. or 0.41 acres. The zoning district requires 21,780 s.f. or 1.0 acres in area. 2.Pre-existing improvements to the property include a residence structure, sidewalks, paved driveway, lakeshore stairway and landing, and other miscellaneous landscaping hardcover, comprising in total 5,037 s.f. of hardcover (43.5%) in the 75-250' hardcover zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and 315 s.f. of hardcover (4.9%) in the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed. The property was the subject of a previous variance application in 1991 which approved hardcover in the 75-250' zone of 5,080 s.f. That approval was granted via City Council Resolution No. 2955 which included the following condition; "2. The City will approve no further encroachment of the principal structure (this includes decks) within the lakeshore yard." Resolution No. 2955 also contained the following finding: "E. The Planning Commission finds that existing drive provides the necessary safety level for vehicular use on a busy County road." Page 2 of 5 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The applicant constructed a deck in spring 1996 constituting 207 s.f. of hardcover of which 165 s.f. is new hardcover and 42 s.f. is over the pre-existing steps. Applicant failed to apply for or obtain the required building permit for this deck. Upon discovery by the Building L.spector, a Stop Work Order was placed on this deck and the property owner was advised to proceed with an after-the-fact variance application if he wished to retain the deck. While the deck meets all setback requirements, it constitutes additional hardcover when the property already exceeds the standard hardcover limits, and therefore is not allowed unless a variance is granted. In order to mitigate the additional hardcover of the deck, applicant proposed to remove 255 s.f. of the existing asphalt driveway and further remove 115 s.f. of lined rockbed, both items within the 75-250' zone and both of which constitute hardcover. The net result of the 165 s.f. additional deck hardcover and 370 s.f. of proposed removals is a net hardcover decrease of 205 s.f. in the 75-250' zone, resulting in 75-250' hardcover of 4,832 s.f. or 41.7%. Sometime between 1991 and 1996 the applicant rebuilt the lakeshore stairway in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone without a permit. That stairway system includes a 6' wide by 13' long platform parallel to the shoreline, where City ordinances would allow only a 4' wide platform at that location. Existing lot coverage by structures is 11% of the entire property area, where the zoning code would allow up to 15% lot coverage by structures. The Council finds that the property as it existed prior to the illegally constructed deck adjacent to the house, contained the maximum amount of hardcover that the property can support. The Council finds that the trade-off of hardcover in the driveway at a location approximately 150-200' from the shoreline is not adequate mitigation for a deck located approximately 75-85' from the lakeshore. Page 3 of 5 11. 12. 13. The Council finds that Planning Commission’s findings in 1991 as stated in Resolution No. 2955 regarding the existing driveway, are still valid, and that the existing driveway provides for the necessary parking and backup apron to allow vehicles leaving the property to enter County Road 19 travelling forward. The Council finds that Condition No. 2 of Resolution No. 2955 provided clear direction to the property owner and to future City Councils that the City should approve no additional hardcover or structure on this property given the rnagnimde of variances already granted, as documented in that resolution. Granting of required variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) with which the applicants must first comply in order that variances be granted. The Council finds that: A.The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property is being used for a single family residence and yard area. B.The plight of the applicant is due to circumstances created by the applicant. The applicant constructed the deck without obtaining the required permit. Had the applicant applied for a permit prior to construction of the deck, he would have been advised of the need for a variance application. C.The conditions and codes applying to the structure and land in questions are not peculiar to the property but are applicable to all other properties in the LR-IC Zoning District. D.Granting of the application is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has the right to maintain his existing residence on the property. E.The granting of the variance will serve as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Applicant had not demonstrated sufficient reasonable hardship or practical difficulty to support the variance requests. Page 4 of 5 14. In review of the factual findings noted above, the Council finds that granting of the proposed variances to allow construction of the proposed room addition would be in complete conflict with the environmental standards for lakes.hore development within the City and would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader environmental principles and goals set forth in its Community Management Plan and the intent of the specific zoning district standards when dealing with matters of public health, safety and welfare. Issues involving public health, safety and welfare are not only resolved by securing the obvious traffic and drainage concerns, but the City is obligated to provide the citizens with a designated and optimum level of density, open space and quality of life. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the applicant shall remove the deck within thirty (30) days of the date of this resolution. Further, applicant shall obtain an after-the-fact permit for reconstruction of the lakeshore stairway system and shall bring said stairway system into conformity by reducing the width of the 6' x 13' platform to 4' in width, such action to be completed within thirty (30) days of the date of this resolution. Non-compliance with either of the above noted conditions shall constinite a violation of the zoning code, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 12th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 , % CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Rob Albrecht 1810 Shady Road Wayzata, MN 55391 APPLICATION NO. 2134 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: July 25, 1996 COPIES:Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. Lindquist & Vennum 4200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Mpls.,MN 55402 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETLNG: 7/22/96 COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: • The initial motion to adopt the approval resolution with minor language revisions regarding Council's intent for hardcover, failed on a vote of 2 ayes (Kelley, Jabbour) and 3 nays (Goetten, Callahan, Hurr). • A motion to table in order that applicant could consult with his attorney on this change of direction by the Council, was approved 5-0. • Applicant's next meeting will be Monday, August 12, 1996, 7;(X) p.m. at the Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway. Staff will present a denial resolution for Council consideration. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. LINDQUIST & \'ENNUM p.llp. 4200 IDS CtNTcn 80 SocT.< E«O hTh STAcrr lbitNN£APOLis. Mit4k£sota 55402*2205 TclCpnonc 612*371*3211 Fax 612 371-3207 In DCNVf a c LlNDOU»ST.VtNNUM6C>#^JSTENS£N AllP 600 17tm S tmcct. S uite 2125 OcNvcA. CocOAAOo S0202* 5401 TcLCPHONt 303*573*5900 Attoaneys AtLa^t Robert C. Mitchell, |r. (612)371-3262 August 8, 1996 AUG 9 199F Orono City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Robert & Tara Albrecht 1810 Shadywood Road Application No. 2134 Ladies ar.d Gentlemen: I understand that the A’brecht application was tabled at your meeting held on July 29, 1996, to your meeting to be held on August 12, 1996. I also understand there was some concern about the appropriateness of this variance. Let me try to address your concerns. I sense a strong undercurrent of disapproval of the Albrechts for beginning the deck construction without a building permit. If that is your thought, then you might conclude that the Albrechts were trying to pull a fast one on the City of Orono. A response to that would be to prevent the Albrechts from doing legally that which they tried to do illegally. A natural response, surely. From the Albrechts' side, they only moved to Orono in 1991. Previously they had lived in Minneapolis and Seattle, Washington. He is from Seattle; she is from Denver. At ED01888.-.75 1 4 LINDQUIST &VENNUM pllp. Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 2 the tinne they moved to Orono, Rob Albrecht was 23 and Tara Albrecht was 24. They bought their house from Mr, Tibbets. They had no special knowledge of Orono's rules or procedures. They did not know the history of this house and lot with Orono. They did not know the lot had a hardcover overage. Rob Albrecht is in the music business. Tara Albrecht was formerly in the music business also, but is now a full-time mother with two young children, ages 4 years and 2 months. Rob Albrecht, being in the music business, and not the construction business. was not familiar with the line between when a building permit was necessary and when it was not necessary. He knows that if you build a house or build an addition to a house, or build a garage, that you need a building permit. He knows that if you plant a new garden. put metal or rubber edging around your lawn or sealcoat your driveway, that you do not need a building permit. He was not aware that you need a building permit for things like construction of a fence, putting up a dock or making a small (165 square foot. approximately 13' x 13') addition to an existing deck. He thought of those activities as falling closer to the landscape-type work than to the house construction work. In his mind, he made an honest mistake. In some of your minds, there is substantial doubt about that fact. But let us assume the worst. Assume that in your mind you are convinced that Rob Albrecht tried to pull a fast one on the City of Orono. What response does Orono have to such action? Orono's land use ordinance provides the penalty of double fees, stoppage of EB01;8S8.175 I LINDQUIST &VENNUM pllp Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 3 work on the project and, of course, the requirement that a building permit be obtained. The ordinance does not state that the person cannot ever get a building permit because of the bad behavior. Therefore, I urge you to work through the issue of alleged bad behavior, punish the Albrechts as the ordinance provides with the delay and the double fees, and move on to consider the substance of their request. We understand that the substance of the matter is that if the Albrechts had applied for a building permit, then the zoning code issue would have been raised. There obviously is no problem with a building pe-miil being issued for a deck. The issue is whether a deck may be addea lO this property at this location under Orono ordinances. A second biack mark in some of your minds against the Albrechts' application is the history of the house at 1810 Shadywood Road. Ironically, 1810 Shadywood Road was the previously existing house on a 100-foot wide parcel. In 1985, the Orono City Council allowed this parcel to be subdivided and a new house was constructed to the northerly of the Albrechts' house. Some of you view that decision as being a mistake. I believe the mistake is that the two small lots were created where there had been one large lot which caused the situation to come into being that the hardcover limitation of 25% would likely be exceeded. That is what turned out happened. There was further City involvement with this property in 1991, when it came to light that what the City viewed as a hardcover compromise by using "pavers* on the EDOl 88S375 I .-Vi LINDQUIST SlVE.nNUM P.L.LP. Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 4 driveway had been unilaterally abrogated by Tibbels, the then landowner, who simply paved the driveway - to your disgust. Against this backdrop, the Albrechts move in with their young family and attempt to improve the premises. Even though your memories of these past actions cannot be wiped clean, in fairness to the Albrechts, I would like you to concentrate on them as human beings trying to live in their new house and raise their family in the City of Orono, despite all the baggage which goes with their house. I propose to you that 'but for' the history of this site, the request to reduce the hardcover in the 75'-250 ’ zone would be cheered by the Orono City Council as a new homeowner bringing his property more into compliance with Orono City ordinances by the 205 square foot hardcover reduction. The City Council knows that the variance request is a mere technicality in this instance only because not even a rearranging of hardcover is permitted without City approval when the lot is over the limit. A secondary question is, however, present which is potentially decisive. The secondary question is whether the rearranging of the hardcover is a guise or subterfuge for the creation of some other bad or inappropriate condition on the property which should be vetoed by the City Council. In this case, the hardcover reduction is 115 square feet in a landscape area - which can only be positive. The other hardcover reduction is the reduction in size of the driveway and parking area by 255 square feet. This raises a legitimate City concern that this reduction in driveway hardcover is reducing the vehicle EB0I:88837} I i i LINDQUIST & \ ENNUM pllp. Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 5 storage area on this lot when there is a need for maximum vehicle storage area on the lot due to no parking on Shadywood Road, the public street adjacent to this property. This question arises because the surveys utilized by the previous landowners and the City of Orono for the purpose of calculating hardcover did not draw attention to the length and width of the driveway and parking area on the lot by specifying exact dimensions. There is no change in the length of the driveway from Shadywood Road to the house. See attached the 3/12/91 Sathre-Bergquist site survey with driveway dimensions added. Also see the 3/96 Otten Bros, plan attached. Therefore, the only dimension which is under the microscope at the present time is the width of the driveway and the turnaround area. The Orono standard for parking spaces is 9' x 20' for a full-size car parking space. You do not have an 8* x 18' compact car parking space category. Those parking space requirements are for commercial parking lots which must not only assume the worst in terms of size of cars, but also must leave room for maneuvering into and out of parking spaces. Therefore, one should consider that those parking space dimensions are generous. The maximum width for a care is 7' or 84". Most cars are less than 16’ or 192" long. In the case of the Albrechts' driveway and turnaround area, the City Council has previously found that the driveway and turnaround area is exceptionally large. In fact, it is the hardcover of the driveway and turnaround area, rather than the house, which causes the hardcover on the lot to exceed the ordinance standard. Part of the reason for the large amount of driveway hardcover is the 126’ distance from the road to the house. But that ED01.8SS375 I 1 LINDQUIST &VENNUM pllp. Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 6 distance has a benefit to Orono in that it creates more off-street parking for the lot such that there is no unsafe condition created on Shadywood Road. You have made Shadywood Road a no-parking zone in this area such that the nearby homeowners must store all their cars and their guests' cars on their own property at all times. When one examines the Albrechts' driveway and turnaround area under a microscope, one finds that the "before" dimensions of the parking lot created 9’-10‘ of width per car, more than the generous full-size car parking requirement Orono requires. The "after" parking lot, with the removal of only 3’ of width, reduces the width per car to 9’, but only on a portion of the driveway. This is still plenty of width for cars in a private driveway, particularly when the cars are able to drive straight into the driveway and no turning movements are required, and it meets your parking space requirement. Even in the turnaround area, the width still remains 18' total, or 9’ per car, more than wide enough for cars in a private drivew'ay. In total, the number of cars which can be parked in this driveway and turn-around area "before* the work was done is 15. The number which can be parked in this driveway and parking lot "after" the 255 square feet of hardcover is removed by reducing the width of the driveway is still 15 cars. Therefore, as a matter of substance, there is no reduction in the safety of this property because there has been no reduction in the car parking spaces on the property. So where do we go from here? I understand the vexation that this application causes the City Council. I think it is justified from your point of view. Your point of view ED01;m37S I ■ 1 LINDQUIST & VENNUM pllp Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 7 is a 15-year history with this piece of properly. However, I would ask you to do your best to set aside the vexatious history because you are required to act in your quasi-judicial capacity when interpreting your zoning code with reference to a variance application. That is the fair thing to do. The substance of the variance application is to reduce a nonconformity which is all to the good. Consequently, the only reason to allow the nonconformity to remain at a larger size is if the proposed hardcover reduction causes a secondary problem. The only secondary problem that could possibly be created by the proposed hardcover reduction would be if the driveway and turnaround area were being reduced in utility. I believe I have amply demonstrated that the utility of the parking and turnaround area remains as viable as before. In addition, your specific minimum number of parking spaces for a single-family house is only two. Surely, this lot which supplies itself with 15 parking spaces has a large enough driveway to be safe. # One of the ironies of the situation is that if the distance from the road to the house were not so great, and/or if parking were allowed on Shadywood Road, the driveway in question could be far, far smaller and could probably be made to conform to the 25% hardcover limitation in the 75'-250' zone. I come up with two possibilities to allow the Albrechts to have a variance to reduce hardcover by 205 square feet: EBOI 888375 1 LINDQUIST &VENNUM p.llp. Orono City Council August 8, 1996 Page 8 1 . Require them to dramatically reduce the size of their driveway and turnaround area and/or demolish the existing asphalt driveway and go back to "pavers', all with the intention of turning the clock back and trying to make this lot conform to the 25% hardcover limitation in the 75'-250 ‘ zone; or 2. Give value and credence to the fact that the small reduction in width of the driveway and turnaround area does not compromise its parking capacity such that the net hardcover reduction of 205 square feet is positive for the City and with no negatives attached, and, consequently, allou them to rearrange their hardcover by deleting some hardcover from the driveway side and adding on to their deck, all outside the 0'*75' zone. Respectfully submitted, LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.l.L.P. RCM:ap Enclosure Mr. and Mrs. Robert Albrechtcc: EUOl 888375 I 1. 2. All the nearby houses on Shadywood Road have lakeside decks. V'irlually al! the decks are larger than the Albrechts' proposed deck. While 1810 Shadywood Road has more than 25% hardcover, the hardcover of the entire neighborhood surely meets the 25% standard. ^41 ■ AJ' __ AVl. . T. MLNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 ZONLNG ADMINISTRATORIS REPORT (*#3) #2025 MICRAEL PLANK, 4115^TERTO\VN ROAD, FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTIOi\#374l \Jabboar moved, Hurr seconded; to adopi-^^olution #3741 of the plat of Maple Place Second Addition. Vote; Acyes 5, Nays 0. (#4) #2134 ROBERT ALBRECHT, 1810 SaVDV'VVOOD ROAD - AFTER-THE- FACT VARLANCE The applicant was present Gaflfiron reported that the Council at their July 8 meeting had conceptually approved an after-the-fact hardcover variance. A draft resolution with conditions and requiring appropriate after-the-fact fees was presented to the Council with the advisory that the property had reached its hardcover limit. GafEron referred to the resolution, item #3 on page 4 of 6. The applicant had no further comments. Goetten asked that the resolution be clear in its language regarding no further hardcover on the propert>' and asked the attorney to review it. She questioned whether the language was as forceful as it could be. She noted that the July 8 minutes lacked her notation that no further hardcover would be allowed on the property and the property has reached it hardcover limits She asked that the minutes be amended to reflect this. Barrett said the draft did attempt to say what was intended but was not presuming to bind a future Council as it did not have the authority to do so. Goetten asked that the resolution be made clear that this Council is against any additional hardcover in the future. Barrett suggested the draft be amended to state, "This Council recommends that no further hardcover variance be granted on this property." Kelley asked if it was the intent of this Council not to approve any future hardcover variance for this property or for increases to hardcover. He noted that the property owner may need a variance in order to switch or trade structure. Jabbour asKed that it be worded so the intended change would not require the applicant coming back again before the Council. Goetten responded that the resolution should state that there should'not be any increases to hardcover. Callahan said it was not his intent to vote in favor of the approval resolution and a vote may be in order. Kelley noted that the applicant’s attorney was not present; and if the vote were such that the resolution be denied, he suggested the application then be tabled. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 22,1996 (#4 - #2134 Robert Albrecht - Continued) Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the resolution as presented with the change in language wording as noted. He noted, if the motion were to fail, the next motion would be to table the application. Hurt asked if there was any time frame to which the hardcover restrictions would be limited Gaffron said no time frame was set but it could be. Hurr said, if the motion were to pass, she would recommend a time frame be indicated Vote Ayes 2, Kelley, Jabbour, Nays 3, Goetten. Callahan, Hurr Motion failed Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to table the application to allow the applicant to consult with his attorney in respect to the deniaJ action Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The application is tabled to the August 12 meeting of the Council. (#5) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SECOND AMENDED PLAN Laurie Lundeen and Mark Gronberg were present. Lundeen asked the Council members if they had been on the site. Goetten said she has been there but not actually w alked it. Kelley said he had been there many times. Jabbour and Callab.an have also visited the site. Mabusth reported that the applicant has provided an amended plan based on recommendations made by the Council. The original plan proposed a private road with cul-de-sac, and the first amended plan proposed a configuration of private road with driveway outlot. The second amended plan proposes a 30' wide driveway outlot to serve lots 1, 3, and 4 only. There are no lot width variances required with the amended plan. The t wner of Outlot C, Bayv iew Farms, Second Addition, has been advised of the change. A private driveway for that subdivision would be intailed within outlets B and D. Callahan asked if the Staff had any problems with the proposal. Mabusth responded that the current proposal will not require lot standard variances. She also responded to a previous concern of the Council on why the Staff was so concerned with a road outlot being dedicated within this plat. Mabusth said the northeast access would serve as besty access for a future N/S through road This was the City's opportunity to plat sections of a future road w'hen surrounding properties are developed. Access from the west would benefit Waukman, as he too would be able to maintain views to lake and open space areas. Waukman was informed of this agenda item on the meeting and asked to attend if he had further concerns. Jabbour asked how this applicant could be expected to carry forwar'^ with the needs of another development. Staff responded that this is the basis for planning for future needs. It is Staffs responsibility to address these issues. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 17, 1996 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Michae! P. GafTron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2134 Robert Albrecht, 1810 Shadywood Road - Variance (After-the- Fact) - Approval Resolution List of Exhibits A - Council Action Notice 7/17/96 B - Approval Resolution At the July 8 meeting, Council voted 3 to 1 to conceptually approve an after-the-fact hardcover variance for the deck constructed on the lake side of the existing residence, directing staff to draft an approval resolution for the July 22 meeting. The approval was subject to the concurrent hardcover removals of 255 s.f in the driveway and 11 5 s.f. in the entry area. A ftuther condition was that the 6' x 13' lakeshore stairway platform be reduced to the normally allowed maximum width of 4'. Applicant is to pay the after-the-fact variance application fee of $220 and obtain the appropriate after-the-fact building permits. Staff was directed that the resolution shall indicate for the benefit of cu: ent and future owners of the property as well as future City Councils that this property has reached its hardcover limits. A resolution is attached for Council consideration and adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Make any appropriate language revisions and adopt the attached resolution to approve after-the- fact hardcover variance for the deck adjacent to the house, subject to conditions noted. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by seconded by ___, to adopt Resolution No. granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subd. 2 and 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) to allow hardcover in the 75-250' zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed, for property at 1810 Shadywood Road owned by Robert Albrecht. Vote: ___ayes,____nays. .*<1^ O A r r>\ \f-^- o - o f CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. #2134 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTiON Date of Notice: July 17,1996 TO: Rob Albrecht 1810 Shady wood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. Lindquist & Vennum 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 07/08/96 VOTE: 3 FOR 1 AGAINST COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To conceptually approve after-the-fact hardcover variance subject to the proposed hardcover removals and subject to bringing the lakeshore stairway platform into conformity; and to direct staff to draft a resolution of approval for adoption at their July 22 meeting. Applicant or a representative should be in attendance at the Monday, July 22 meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. i i.-. w*=rsv»TT:^*: ■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) FILE NO. 2134 WHEREAS, Robert and Tara Albrecht (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the propert>' located at 1810 Shad\'wood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 22, Shad>'W'ood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit the construction of a deck located within the 75-250' setback zone constituting an additional 165 s.f. of hardcover when hardcover in the 75-250' zone already exceeds the 25% limit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2134. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1996 and a revised proposal on June 17, 1996 and at that June 17 meeting voted 3 in favor, 4 against on a motion to recommend approval of the requested variances. Page 1 of 6 hr- 4. The City Council reviewed the revised application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff comments by the applicants and their attorney, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community', at the regular Council meeting of July 8, 1996 and voted 3 to 1 to conceptually approve the requested hardcover variance subject to specific conditions, and directed City staff to prepare a resolution for adoption. 5. The City Council finds that: A. The property has been the subject of previous after-the-fact hardcover variances, the most recent of which was granted in 1991 to allow 5,080 s.f. of hardcover within the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone. B. The applicant in spring 1996 constructed a deck on the lake side of the existing residence within the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone, such deck comprising 165 s.f of additional hardcover. Applicant proposes the concurrent removal of 255 s.f of existing driveway and 115 s.f existing landscape area hardcover, resulting in a net hardcover decrease of 205 s.f in the 75-250* zone. C. D. E. No variances other than hardcover are required for the deck. The applicant failed to obtain a building permit prior to construction of the deck and therefore is subject to after-the-fact investigation fees for this variance application and all necessary building permits. The applicants reconstructed the lakeshore bank stairway serving the property at some time during the period 1991-1996 without obtaining the required building permit, and that structure does not conform to the City standards for such structures because it includes a platform 6* in width where only a 4* wide platform is normally allowed. The Council finds that thi.s structure should be brought into conformity and the proper after- the-fact permit be obtained by the applicant. Page 2 of 6 ”1 6. 7. F.Council finds that the applicants’ proposal to remove a 255 s.f portion of the existing driveway will not make access to the propert> less safe, because there will still be substantial parking available in the remaining driveway and the necessary backup apron near the west end of the property will still be functional to allow cars leaving the property to enter County Road 19 (Shadywood Road) driving forward. Council finds that the removal of portions of landscape hardcover which were allowed by resolution in 1991 is appropriate as a means to reduce overall hardcover in the 75-250* zone. H.Council finds that once the current construction and hardcover removals are complete, the propert> will have been developed to its maximum hardcover potential, and it is the Council’s intent that future property owners and future Councils be advised that the current Council would not approve future hardcover additions or intensifications on this property. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the applicants' attorney, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv'e a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow the construction of a deck constituting 165 s.f of additional hardcover in the 75-250’ zone, resulting in an excess of hardcover above the 25% hardcover limit normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone shall be limited to 4,832 s.f. (41.7%) per the site plan and hardcovei calculations attached to this resolution as E.xhibit A. All hardcover removals required per Exhibit A shall be completed before applicant is issued a building piermit. Hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone shall be limited to the existing 180 s.f. portion of the house and 90 s.f of lakeshore stairway/platform structure, for a total of 280 s.f or 4.3% of the 0-75' zone. This result shall be accomplished by applicants reducing the 6' x 13' platform portion of the lakeshore stairway to a width of 4'. The property owner is advised that any future proposal to increase or intensify hardcover on the property will require a new variance application and is unlikely to be approved based on the findings of the Council noted in this resolution. It is the intent of the current Council not to approve any future hardcover variances for this property. Within 30 days of the date of this approval, applicant shall pay the $220.00 after-the-fact variance application fee, and shall obtain an after-the-fact building permit for construction of the deck abutting the house, and shall obtain an after- the-fact building permit for the construction of the lakeshore stairway. Further, applicants shall make any revisions to said structures deemed necessary by the Building Inspections Department to bring said structures into conformity with the Building Code requirements. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the Page 4 of 6 applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 12, 1997). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Miimesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 o’-ai ^ < EJ Si § 3 sOQ - 3 X o 3 CT n c ^ - H3 p 3 C/D P Oro p p *. S- !■§ p £L < ? ^ 3n> 3 -» O VJ 3 O- 3 CTQ c 2. ^ r?n> o cx C/. n» 3 o. o p ^ ^« 3 *— 3* ^ o « o r: CL 3 Q o fv H) VO VO VO VO VO VO 0\ 0\ ^ a: D r ^ 2 < Ia v: 3*o -1no 00 Lh TJ ■-I O oton> CL CD X KJ\ Ul I K) Ui O 3 OQ Lh I to Ulo to LOo 3- CXoo <n> 3- P B.oo <a*1 3- E;cxoo <o S', fc/j O 3 ^ - 2 ^ *3 0^ ^ - P O ^ o p p OQn> o CO 3 < P a o < EJ p •3 3 *-i O < P o 3 3 CO 3- 3 3 Xi O O 3 CL = O E- O 3 ^ X. c Sg. E rt i; X) g O 3o 3 I ? >< vy z > 3 ^ "-a ^ o n PS-s I rr ' JOo Xco CO a 5* O CTQ rr Ci5 ON Lfl fH -1 I 3 fD I fib i-i ^ 3 »-♦ c S =52 o 3 P*-i CL O O n> 3’3 1 3 <1^ o 58 to O < Q P ^5* K» 3 Oo ^cn CL i.c/i n. f? • CL P vn o' ^ 5L O p o o*v< ‘ to p 3Lnacx mrn^ CL •—4 S P P S o 3 P O < P B- ^oo < O CXan 7T 3 u% to > 3 3 n P O 3 CX)c 3 3 p •5 / •1 N V / •\ noc 3 rD » m k-r-*.T:viV.V.< t\ __i N CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Cr>stal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. NOTICE OF COUNCII^CTIOtf Date of Notice: July 30, ______________________________________________________________ TO:Greenfield Corporation 330 Hopkins Crossroads Minnetonka, MN 55305 Attn: Jim Pfennig COPIES: Mark Gronberg 482 Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Preliminary Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 07/22/96 VOTE: 4 FOR 1 AGAINST COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Council conceptually approved the six lot residential subdivision per the revised plans dated July 12, 1996. You are as’.ed to review the enclosed approval resolution and to contact staff prior to Council’s August 12, 1996 meeting if you have any questions. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you are unable to attend the August 12th meeting or if you have any further questions pertaining to the status and review of your application. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY a PPROVA of a class III SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST - FILE NO. 2136 WHEREAS, Greenfield Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the "subdivider") on April 26, 1996, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a six lot residential plat of property legally described as: The West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT that part of the West 274.77 feet of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies South of the North 580.00 feet of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, and which lies North of the South 545.34 feet of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 20, 1996, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meetings held on June 10, 1996, July 8, 1996 and July 22, 1996, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 17.2 acres with 2.34 acres of designated wetland area. Page 1 of 8 6. 7. 8. 9. The proposed plat consists of six residential lots each meeting the minimum lot standard requirements of the RR-IB. Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. All lots have been found to have adequate and suitable soils for on-site septic treatment facilities providing both a primar>’ and alternate site for each of the six lots. Lots 1, 3 and 4 shall be served by a private driveway designated on the plat as Outlot A. Lot 2 shall be ser\ed by an approved access at North Shore Drive or County Road 19. Lots 5 and 6 shall be ser\ed by an approved shared access at North Shore Drive or County Road 19. Outlot A shall be expanded to provide a backout pad for emergency vehicles at the east or road entrance side of outlot. The City Engineer, in his report of May 13, 1996, approved the grading and drainage plan for the development of this property. Thomas D. Johnson, a Transportation F^lanning Engineer for the Heimepin County Department of Transportation, in his report of May 13, 1996, approved the three curb cut locations at the Count) roads. Orono's Community Management Plan, Rural Transportation Policy 7 entitled "Driveway Locations in Rural Street or Private Road Intersections will be Limited for Traffic Safety" states as follows: "Joint use of carefully located private roads will generally be preferred over direct access on to public highways from separate properties." The developer has provided the following unique findings and hardships to support the creation of three new curb cuts (one existing curb cut to be relocated) that shall ser\e all six residential lots. The Planning Commission has accepted the findings and hardships presented by developer. They ar-i reviewed as follows: Page 2 of 8 A. Location of wetlands. B. C. D. E. F. Sloping topography to south and east. Subdivider's responsibility to provide a future access road to serve property to east. Property is surrounded by 1,800' of County Road along the north and west sides. The existing access serving Lot 6 has been found to be unsafe and encroaciics within property to the south. The new curb cut developed at the shared lot lines of Lots 5 and 6 has been approved by the County and meets the required sighting distance for a 50 mph speed zone. New curb cut to serve Lot 2 has been found to meet the si^ ;>fi§rSJLiety standards for the 50 mph speed zone. G. The location of septic sites on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. H. Desire of subdivider to preserve views to the south and southeast for the obvious building sites on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. 10. Orono's Community Management Plan, Transportation Chapter, CMP 7-17 states as follows: "PRIVATE DRIVEWAY A driveway is a privately ovmed and privately maintained vehicle path between the street and private property. Private driveways shall be subject to access permits according to the classification of the abutting street. Private driveways will not be subject to any public easement or access right, but do require recorded private easements where driveways cross an intervening private lot between the residence ser\ed and the street. JURISDICTION: PROPERTY OWNER Page 3 of 8 MAXIMUM SERVICE:1 RESIDENCE TYPICAL; JOINT DRIVEWAYS ALLOWED WITH MAXIMUM THREE RESIDENTS PER DRIVEWAY IN RURAL AREAS MORE USERS REQUIRE PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS DRIVEWAY WIDTH:WILL BE REGULATED WHERE MORE THAN ONE USER IS INVOLVED OR FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES WHERE THERE IS EXCESSIVE LENGIH BETWEEN THE RESIDENCE AND THE PUBLIC ROAD" The Comprehensive Management Plan allows three residential lots to be served by a private driveway. The Management Plan fiirther states that a driveway serving more than one residential lot shall be regulated. The City Engineer shall be asked to provide design specifications for the private driveway within Outlot A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Greenfield Corporation per plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., dated May 3, 1996, most revised date July 12, 1996, subject to the following conditions: 1.Subdivider to grant a bike trail, drainage and utility easement 10' wide adjacent to Bayside Road (County Road 84) and North Shore Drive West (County Road 19). 2.Subdivider to dedicate 17’ of additional right-of-way for North Shore Drive West along the west boundaries of Lots 1 and 2. 3.Subdivider to e.xecute private covenants defining responsibility tor the upkeep and maintenance of private driveway, Outlot A, by Lots 1, 3 and 4 and covenants to also address owTiers of all six lots’ responsibility for maintenance of drainage facilities within plat. Page 4 of 8 4. Subdivider shall be responsible for dividing equally the share in ownership in driveway Outlot A of Lots 1, 3 and 4 via transfer deed of lots upon sale. 5. All septic sites within subdivision are to be fenced ofl' prior to any land alterations. 6. Subdivider to grant flowage and conservation easement over designated wetland within Lot 6. 7. Subdivider to designate drainage easement at a minimum width of 15' over drainageway that e.\tends westw^d from Outlot A to sediment pond in northwest comer of Lot 1. Drainage easements are to be taken oxer all sediment ponds and drainageways within plat. 8. Subdivider to install driveway with backout pad within Outlot A. Plans for drive shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 9. Subdivider shall be responsible for installing a conforming septic system to serve existing residence on Lot 6 within 90 days of the date of preliminary plat approval (November 12, 1996) or prior to final plat approval, whichever occurs first. 10. Subdivider is hereby advised that the City carmot grant final plat approval until a permit from the MCWD has been approved for all grading and drainage improvements on the property. 11. Subdivider to create private covenants for protection of Types I and II wetlands located within property that are not classified as a designated wetland of the City of Orono. Such covenants to include site plans locating protected area and advising future owners of need to contact Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the U. S. Corp of Engineers if land alterations are proposed before submitting plan to the City for review and possible permit. Covenants shall include protective language for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. Applicant to develop language alerting future property owners of need to protect sites on adjacent properties. Covenant shall also advise future owner of Lot 3 that no residential construction shall be allowed to south of primary and alternate septic sites. Page 5 of 8 12.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, August 12, 1997. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regulaily scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County') and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated most revised date, July 12, 1996. B.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot line. 10’ drainage and utility easements adjacent to County roads to include trail easement in favor of City (refer to special easement form attached). C.Dedication of right-of-way for County Road 84 at 33' and 50' adjacent to west lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 and 33' adjacent to the west lot lines of Lots 5 and 6 for County Road 19. D.Designation and dedication of drainage easements over detention ponds and drainageways as shown on preliminary plat. E.Designation and dedication of drainage easement over the designated wetlands located within Lot 6. F.Designation of Outlot A to serve as a private driveway. Outlot A at a 30' width is a private driveway that will serve Lots i, 3 and 4. G. The naming of plat. Page 6 of 8 .-cn .---.i. 2. Legal documents required: A. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. B Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently atTecting the property. Signed and executed drainage easements to be taken over drainageway and detention areas within plat (see sample enclosed). Signed and executed developer ’s agreement and letter of credit for approved site improvements and construction of private driveway (Outlet A) and a single address sign locating residences served by Outlot A at Bayside Road entrance (see samples enclosed). Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation easement over designated wetland within Lot 6. Signed and executed declaration of private covenants dealing with the upkeep and maintenance of private drive (Outlot A), drainage facilities and specifying share of Lots 1, 3 and 4 in ownership of Outlot A (see sample enclosed). Signed and executed trail easement over 10' wide drainage and utility easements adjacent to County Roads (see sample enclosed). Completed private covenant for lots involved with protected wetland not included within conservation maps of City which shall include a site plan and metes and bounds descriptions for these areas. Covenants to include protective language for alternate septic sites and to include the site plans locating both the primary and alternate sites. Subdivider to develop language alerting future owners of need to protect sites on adjacent properties. Covenants must be in a form suitable for filing. The City has samples of protective covenants used by former developers. Subdivider may wish copies and should notify City. Page 7 of 8 9. Fees to be paid: Total due: $400.00* A. Final plat fee = $200.00 B Legal review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents $200.00 ♦Park dedication fee shall be determined as soon as City Assessor has placed a fair market value on the undeveloped land at the time of preliminary plat approval. The subdivider shall be advised as soon as Assessor's report has been filed with City. Park dedication fee shall be based on 8% of the fair market value of land within Lots 1 through 5. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 12th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me c* this 12th day of August, 1996, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayot ».• Citv Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument wr- . t ;\‘ . /ed on behalf of the City. Notary' Public Page 8 of 8 • Tw % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August ^^96 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning &. Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Amendment to 1996 Joint Use Dock License - Big Island, Inc, Summary of Request Mark Scholle, secretary' of Big Island, Inc., applied for an amendment of their 1996 Joint Use Dock License. The amendment is to add a third dock to the property, to accommodate handicapped people at a location where the topography would minimize the need for long, hazardous stairways. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - F - G - Location Map June 27, 1996 Letter of Request/Amended Application/Dock Plan Correspondence of 7-25-96/7-17-96/5-2-96 1996 Current License Resolution and E.\hibits Proposed Resolution and Exhibits Resolution No. 3006 Discussion Big Island, Inc. owns a five acre parcel at the southwest end of the Big Island Channel, where they have operated a day use recreation area for their private membership, since 1991. This use was approved via City Council Resolution No. 3006, which includes the following condition: "1. Big Island, Inc. shall be limited to 15 slips at the shared joint use dock. Any attempt to increase the number of slips shall require an amendment of this conditional use permit and the filing of a new conditional use permit with the appropriate notice to adjacent property owners." After discussion with Mr. Scholle regarding the use of the current docks and the numbermg of slips, staff concluded that the proposed 32’ dock would essentially constitute a 15th slip m addition to the 14 shown on the current and previous site plans. Staff further concluded that this would not require an amendment to the conditional use permit, but should be considered a formal amendment to the annual Joint Use Dock License. .,^p Request for Council Action continued Page 2 August 7, 19% Amendment to 1996 Joint Use Dock License - Big Island, Inc. Staff would note that the current license is for 15 transient slips, but the exhibits only defined 14 slip locations. For this reason, an amendment to establish the location of the 15th slip is appropriate. Staff has received no complaints regarding Big Island, Inc.'s use of the property, and we have no information suggesting they are not in compliance with the conditions of Resolution No. 3006. For the record, the septic system on the property has been found to be non-conforming due to lack of 3' separation, and will have to be replaced by the end of 1998. Staff Recommendation The proposed handicap dock would appear to be in a location and configuration that has no impact on the use of the lake or neighboring properties. Staff would recommend approval of this amendment to the 1996 license, with an advisory to the applicants that they must contact the LMCD regarding a revision to their LMCD multiple dock license. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution directing staff to issue an amended Joint Use Dock License to Big Island, Inc. subject to conditions noted herein for the period of August 12, 1996 to December 31, 1996. t % t A . I« ; ijOcATlot^ BIG ISLAND. INC. P.O. Box 188 • Exc iior, Minnesota 55331 June 27, 1996 JUU ■S 1996 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Thank you for forwarding to me the information with your 05/02/96 letter. We have not yet constructed the handicap dock and will not do so until we have approval from the City. I do not believe that our boat space needed would exceed 15 boats. I have been in our group since it started in 1984, and I have never seen as many as 15 boats docked there at any time at all. The annual renewals for our dock license should continue to be sent to: Mr. Brian Tichy BIG ISLAND, INC. 1471 Lake Lucy Road Excelsior, MN 55331 I have traced the property from the acreage survey that is on file with the City. I have separated the docks into Dock A, Dock B, and Dock C. Dock A and Dock B already exist but I have gone ahead and measured these for an accurate depiction. Actually, we purchased new docking this year that was installed by a professional so the measurements vary a little bit from what is on file with you. The enclosed measurements are accurate. The totd dock lengths have actually reduced. 11 i Mr. Michael P. Gaffron June 27, 1996 Page 2 Essentially, our proposal is to have a handicap dock on the west side of our property. As you Ttiay know, the l^d slopes downward from cast going west. The house is on the east part of the property at high elevation. Our members are of an age presently where our parents are somewhat infrim. It would really help us to be able to off load the handicapped people and wheel them up to the house, or let them walk up the gradual slope to the house. Under the present configuration, we must carry them in their wheelchairs up the long stairways at the bases of Docks A and B. If the handicap dock is approved, this will eliminate that hazardous (and very scary) process. I did not know whether we would owe any additional fee or not and have left that part of the application blank. If we do owe an additional fee, simply call me at 338-1330 and I will be sure a check is issued to you. I have yet to contact Gregory S. Nybeck of the LMCD, but we are trading calls at this point. Thank you for your attention to this. Very truly yours. Mark Scholle Secretary MS:cs enclosures CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 LICENSE \T:AR 19 96 ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff 05/02/96 Date Application Returned to City Fee Received $By Employee Section 5.42, Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It i« unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CFTY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 20 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCI ATION INFORMATION 1. 2. Association title or name (if any) Bi island > Inc, Lake Minnetonka _______________Bay Lower lake 3 Person responsible for this application: Name Mark Scholle Phone 612—338—1330 Mailing Address 200 South Sixth Street > Suite 430 ^ Hinnearolis» 55402 Relationship to association _____________________________________ Association is (check applicable items): ____ unincorporated homeowner ’s group. _ incorporated Homeowner ’s Association. _ unincorporated club or recreation group. Page ! of 5 , _ ------- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. X incorporated club or recreation group. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): ____provide boat mooring and laxe access for residential property. ____provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock. provide a club or association gathering place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item): ____ one member’s priwi? property. ____ easement or outlot owned in common. ___ property leased by the group/association. __ property ow ned by the group/association. List Dock location and ownership information: Street address and 19, located on Big Island, Orono, Minnesota Legal property description see attached Exhibit A PID# _______________________________ Listed property ow’ner(s) Bia Island, Inc i^.O. Box 1R8, Excelsior, W 55331 Names of abutting lakeshore property ow ners: (NorthAVest) unknown — believe to be Erickson (Name + Address) (South/East) n/a (Name Address) Names of other affected property ow ners: n/a (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) Insurance Coverage - The jointly used dock is insured by one of the following: ____ property ow ner's homeow ner's policy. separate group/ ssociation owned policy. List the following information: Name of insured Island, Inc. Name of insurance carrier St, Paul Reinsurance Name of insurance agency Erickson-Larsen, Inc.__________________ Policy No. S-2363-’^IN________ Effective date of coverage 06/29/96 ~ 06/29/97 Page 2 of 5 Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence $ 1 million Public liability, per occurrence $ 1 million 10. Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items): _____ fencing ____ security lighting ____ property owner's presence contract security service X other (specify) nanbers of corporation plus one ite'ber faces prooerty with telescone and observes DOCK INFOR.VIATION 11.List Dock Use Area Specifications: See attached and orior armlication Width of shoreline: _________ft. Length of main dock from shore: _______ Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore: _________ ft. and _______ ft ft. 12.Dock Construction (check applicable items). - X . seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) ____ permanent piling with seasonal deck ____ permanent piling and decking X wooden decking ____ metal decking 13. List Dock Accessories: Number of fire extinguishen available at the dock 1 at each dock Number of life preservers available at the dock none ___________ 0 List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes be. lifts): Transient (day use only) slips Transient (day use) off shore buoys Permanent moorage slips______0 Permanent moorage off-shore buoys 0 Dry .storage (rack) slips _______0 Maximum number of boats at the dock s 15 List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the Joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by aiiy public road. n/a spaces. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 16. Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items): ___ stone rip rap ___ wood seawall ___ metal seawall ___ concrete seawall ___ grass and vegetation only X other (specify) larce stones plus vegetation Page 3 of 5 17. Depth of water at shoreline: ^ ft; at 50 ft. out: at 100 ft. out: REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. B C. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline w idth of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dr\ storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATION^ 1 . A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2.A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note; This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in_______(state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS *See attached Exhibit B 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of al' orporation officers. 2.A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. 33 members 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renew al application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as original^ made or last amended in Minnesota!ate year) and on file with the 02/23/39 pplicant’s initials D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule INITIAL APPLICATION FEE RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE. per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy _____slips @ 2.00 each $ $20.00 Page 4 of 5 1 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION LATE FEE - Renewals Application for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than March 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 20 unless the application is accompanied bv a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and. in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the Citv of Orono and the City ’s employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Signed Date Page 5 of 5 1 - - -- - - - --- - - - - r •• •n;‘2 :.• ^ ^*■ *•••. . •,*• .«*•. .••••*. • • *• • • • resolution S3006 EXHIBIT A All that part of Lj3t 1/ I'^^^s^tn^SectUDn 22, Township*!!", subdivision of Government ^ ,5^ \yip.5 southwesierly of a line Range 23, Hennepin County, Lot 7, saic running from ^he no* thue^s^ter Si,bdivision, to the midpoint Ot Rearrangenvent of Lot ' ' ^ ,, Rearrangement of tot 1, the northwesterly Ixne Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, !0, !!, !2,_ Kitchel's Subdivision, v tchel' s Subdivision or ,3, 14 and 15, 22,' township 117, Range 23,Government Lots 5 and o, SeCs.-cn Hennepin County, Minnesota- . Lots 2. 3, 4, 5 and that ^or'Aer of Lot 7 to the a line running from i y " i^ne of said Lot !, atlmidpoint of the frthwes.e ly Rearrangement of Lot ^ 23 according to the recorded plat rhtrJoi o/fiie^nd Vf Ulor^d'in^\'h/off ice of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B ALL COKPORATION OmCERS NAMES, MAILING ADDRESSES AND TITLES Linda Bean, President, P.O. Box 188, Excelsior, MN 55331 Joe Quinn, Vice President, P.O. Box 188, Excelsior, MN 55331 Brian Tichy, Treasurer, P.O. Box 188, Excelsior, MN 55331 Mark Schollc, Secretary, P.O. Box 188, Excelsior, MN 55331 <Xli ujId i ix^ '-t^ S LjO^'^^ /' /N 'y^'' I v^d<. (t) >A, JZ^acKl^ ’bZ." SlA)i'*vu.M.Va / I3 o€j >.4-<'k« (X.5ft ^ /V. CH' ) s/ Sioi'^Vvi'k^ Ohy-*-^A.i-t q ------7"---------------- 5/. OooK/5 Ro /(-/4 - to<3L^ ^vr 33^''V?'' //cM/L^ # C^O ^ VL,i/\.(ocK^l iA.^^ CL^n^ 4\ 3^/ su^ BiG ISLAND. INC.t>«-. c - / P.O.Box 188 • Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 July 25, 1996 Mr. Michael P. Gaffton Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. \.>atfiron: Thank you for your letter ..f July 17, 1996. I will be pleased to be present at the City Council meeting this August 12, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in case the Council has any ques^’ons of me concerning our review and approval of the revisions to our current joint use dock license. I anticipate that there will be no questions but I will certainly be available should they have any. Thank you for your assistance. Very, truly yours Mark Scholle Secretary MS:cs cc: Linda Bean -- President Brian Tichy -- Treasurer . c - ^ GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 July 17, 1996 Mark Scholle 430 Pillsbury Center 200 South 6th Street Mirmeapolis, Minnesota 55402 Dear Mark: Thank you tor your letter of June 27th regarding the proposed revision to the Big Island, Inc. docks. This item will be presented for Council review and approval at their August 12th meeting, which starts at 7:00 p.m. and will be held at the Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway. It would be appropriate if a representative of Big Island, Inc. could be present, although I suspect there will be relatively little discussion on what appears to be a very minor revision to your current joint use dock license. The fee for this amendment to your 1996 joint use dock license is $20.00, the same as your annual renewal fee. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Telephooe (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 gr<^ . C ‘ E GlTYofORONO Monkifnl Oflkcs Stmt AtMrtss: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailinf Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 May 2, 1996 Mark Scholle 430 Pillsbury Center 200 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Big Island, Inc. Proposed Dock Revisions Dear Mr. Scholle: Thank you for your call last Tuesday requesting infomvation on construction of an additional dock at the west end of the Big Island, Inc. property. City of Orono Resolution No. 3006 granted a conditional use permit (CUP) for this Day Use Recreation Area in 1991. Condition #1 of this resolution limits the site to 15 slips, and any increase will require that a new conditional use permit be applied for. If your plan is to eliminate as many existing slips as you create and remain at 15 total, no new CUP would be required. A CUP application is attached should you need to use it. Whether or not you need to file a new CUP, you will need to amend your 1996 Orono Joint Use Dock License. That form is also attached. It's important that you contact the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) because they will likely also require a revision of their license. I will rely on their interpretation of whether you are creating an additional slip or just relocating an existing one. Please call me at 473-7357 if you have further questions. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator end. cc: LMCD, att. Greg Nybeck Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 GITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 8 69 5 ^NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING SI .VFF TO ISSUE A .JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO BIG ISLAND, INC. SI B ILCr TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF J.ANUARV 1, 1996 TO DECEMBER 31,1996 M HEREAS, the City of Orono. hereinafter ■'Cit>" is a municipal corporation o.-ean:zed and existing ui'.der the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and reJponsibilicy under Minnesota Statutes. State Statute 412. et. seq. and State Statute 462. et. seq.. to prc'tect The heahh. safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the Cit>- and other members of the public within the City; and \N HERE.AS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the prirnar- harbor limit of the Civ'’ of Orono with the L akc Minnetonka Conservation District and tite Department of Kaunal Resources of the State of .Minncsoui; and S^'IIERE.AS, the regulation of the navigable wr.ter.s involves an exercise of police power of the Stale, LMCD. and the City of Orono. ail of which have adopted rules to ensure to all ccj jrs! emoyiaent of tlie public lights and equai protection fioin activity on or near inc public waters jud or. the kind witliin the City which, if unregulated, may be dctiimenta! to the public hcaiin, safety an J general welfare; a.nd WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD. and trie City- of Orono regulate the ".looertv rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners rnd the commercia» marma vvvners to the cxiem prohibiting any interference with the public waters adtoiiiuig taeir propc.,v. The LMCir*. DN'R and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship (A’cr the public waters by protcetinti again.st inierfercnve by a.nyone, including those who asseit the ccni.monUiw rights t;. rire-ian owne’S. whether or not they be commercial .marinas or residential owriais. is .^l• U'HERf.AS. as to Lake MiniietonKa. a mutual right of enjoyment exists between .'ina .....-.area d\ ripanat! ownci.< a-.d ilic public generally, no one ppaiiiui owner ins exclusive privileges OT cr Lake Minnetonlta. The only additional prixaie ricli* ih.ni any riparian owxier may ha\ e over the public generafly is to conrnici one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters, fhere caii be no dispute but th.at the public generally and each riparian owner to L ake .Minnetonka has the nght to use tl'e entire surface .area oi Lake Minnetonka lor ail suiUable purposes in common with all oili».r rirarian owners. Tnis riuhi is a rielu not only to members of the public but the right to each npanan • ^ ^ owner. This mutual right of enjoyment wliich is shared by riparian owners and ‘he public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the nparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and \i Pace ! of2 /o^ o GITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ ^ ^______w WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian u>er> of the lake arc regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lalteshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, w hich regulations include the annual licensing f Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and co'ncems and the following special conditions as they relate to an aoplication lor an ynnnal Joint Use Dock Licen:e described on Exiiibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a .Toir.t Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions, noted on Exhibit .\ auached. Adopted by the City Ccimcil of the City of Otono at their meeting on the 1 Ith day ) ss. COUNTY OF HENTx’EPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of March, 1996 by Gabriel Jabbour & Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor & City' Clerk ot the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. SSj& LINDA S.VEE N01ARYPU8UC-MINNES0TA HENNEPIN COUNTY My Conunlssion Expiics Jan. 31.2000 Notaiy' Public Paue 2 of2 r CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 8 6 9 5 CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Big Island, Inc. Dock Address: Big Island, Record Lots #12 and 19 (520/530 Big Island) Agent: Brian Tichy (Treasurer) Address: 1471 Lake Lucy Road, Excelsior, MN 55331 Licensee is:unincorporated homeowner's group incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group XX incorporated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996 II.BOAT DENSITY The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B and C, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Lower Lake Sub-Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water 9 Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY ♦Per Resolution No. 3006, occasional overnight camping allowed. -or... .... ------ Exhibit A Resolution No. .8 6 9 6 Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by tiiis license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit U. Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1 . Licensee shall comply with all requirements of City of Orono Resolution No. 3006. 2.The maximum allowed boat density per Resolution No. 3006 is 15 total slips. Any increase above this number of slips shall be subject to licensee first obtaining Conditional Use Pcmiit approval from the City. The number of slips licensed for the current license period is 15 . V.Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory aulhoi ilios .shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. STYROFOAM DOCK ADVISORY. Licensee is advised that the use of unprotected styrofoam as a dock flotation material has been banned per Ordinance No. 104, Second Series. \ • ^a r^' / • o J~ • n I • .* gx-'^/fiir.^- ^tfS'l^UATTO'^ /% ro' v-^ ;•;• » t• •• ^*s-OF 5^1 . W C 3‘ - 2"'I aeHrn r* »• e S.S VA -.r ^I C RECtlVtu I " f-^ auu 3199Z ■ *i # s • / y 3 2)' 2t' ^ ^ acreage ., survey• • r •.;-v •VO\i • •Big Island, Inc.• • ^ • •ft • • ft *• lakeUmilETOIlKA ... . . . ^ M.y, I:-: ' • •'•* "/•=• C .-I ^eg. 5 hta k • 3.AO ocftJ AfPa 0 ■ 206___1L_ TOTAL* 5.46 - htn\ C • 2.00 ocfcj. total * 7.46 ' ..... -^*. •7 • . / /"•■* r-:-: •.>•• •.- •?; . •«. 7J>V ‘771..6 0 6 ■.....‘-.‘••I 1 .- .:••.• ........................ LAKE‘1’ ’ ”•■ • ' ’• HIimElOHKl • I •** • •• • * . ?ili • ftt • • • ’ «#««•••• ••« ft •• * »-••• : .•••1 • i>A^1= RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE AN AMENDED JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO BIG ISLAND, INC. SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF AUGUST 12,1996 TO DECEMBER 31,1996 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City” is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primar>’ harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of tlie State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate Ae property rights of the riparian owTiers both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may ha\ e o\ er the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and Page 1 of2 1 WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial benefcial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 12th day of August, 1996. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of August, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of2 k. 1 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF TSSUANCF. FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE POCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Big Island, Inc. Dock Address: Big Island, Record Lots #12 and 19 (520/530 Dig Island) Agent: Brian Tichy (Treasurer) Address: 1471 Lake Lucy Road, Excelsior, MN 55331 Licensee is:unincorporated homeowner's group incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group XX incorporated club or recreation group other ______________ License Period - August 12, 1996 to December 31,1996 II.BOAT DENSITY The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B and C, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Sub-Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY Lower Lake 15^ ♦Per Resolution No. 3006, occasional overnight camping allowed. Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and'or prosecution by the City. 1. Licensee shall comply with all requirements of City of Orono Resolution No. 3006. 2.The maximum allowed boat density per Resolution No. 3006 is 15 total slips. Any increase above this number of slips shall be subject to licensee first obtaining Conditional Use Permit approval from the City. The number of slips licensed for the current license period is 15 . V.Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. VI.STYROFOAM DOCK ADVISORY. Licensee is advised that the use of unprotected styrofoam as a dock flotation material has been banned per Ordinance No. 104, Second Series. \ft 5' / :>• c »X •■ 1 ^ r , ^ / I !• ^V\ t-ii^ ‘1- IT '”'• ••1 • •• ^IfSOLiATTO^ ^’wPS*c n C 3’ O ~ O v< (• "O ^ C^l» -V ^n H- ir C ft v< ui — >5' VA -.r ~I nactivtu I jmi 3 TO ■ « \ * f acreage ., survey• ’ • • • .• •• •’> •Island, Inc.\rO\i • 9• *• • li ;• . / .V *, •. V•V • • /.• • * V.4o2lv.i''''; ■‘•N ■• UiKE MIUIlETOinCA . £;c//)^ir c. . Aioo A • 3.-J0 oc'ej Afco O' 206 ‘V- TOTAL* 5.^6 •* Areo C » 2.00 oer ey TOTAL* 7.^6 ' •fooi ------- /. I'"',fe4Vc|i.tAV0UT vfc?.; ^ . A i 'V ••». ^:r “ •.•B . .1. . 1 Y^ r% m I rc?^2l5!L :.r. • • 1 . ______ 4 • • • f • -f. . -•’***•‘“^^7,1X1—iJ :• , ••..■*. * « •• • • ••-•. •»»*•• ‘i * ... LAKE'** * *.* * MUIHETONKA • •••• • nt'Mt I* M 1 ••••«• • • «4^V«444« a*#• •••• •• , .•••!• ••• •4M*4 9 ; *i • • I• I • 0*t K. ( (XU D.ci^s £/s<. exHiaiT ^ fZCSC'LUTtOt'^^ AiO, VocK. Q) D-*U:( D*c Ku ll^UJld 5u».’k».,vi:«.^/ I3*«k,f.*K^ Us 54 ]^e>cK. TXfJ^U i. ocJ^ Is f^ o ((• A - UJa-<j '^'1^ (A^in(oo<ei.tiAj^ Ct^ 5t' 'z' Slvo-. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL f^O. 3006 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) AND VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 t 2 PILES #1606 t 1660 AWHEREAS, Thomas«7udd, an authorized agent of Big Island Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located on Big Island, Orono classification. Record Lots 12 and 19, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows : Refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to allow a day use recreation area with occasional over ­ night camping at a maximum user level of 100 and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 that would allow the repair of an existing swimming doc)c/deck located within the 0-75' la)ce- shore protected area where no structures or hardcover are allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. These applications were reviewed as Zoning Files #1606 and 1660. 2. The property is located in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. Per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C)l - One acre in area is needed for each 20 users. The day use recreation facility will be limited to 100 users based on the existing 5.02 acres. 3, On July 15, 1991, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the applications as proposed and recom^nded approval based on the following findings: Page 1 of 5 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3006__________ A) The 5.02 acre site is large enough to support a day use recreation area and occasional overnight camping use without any adverse effect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands located within the western portion of the subject property. B) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties. C) Based on the proposed level of use# the fire protection system developed by the Orono staff for Big Island and the bylaws developed by applicant will provide the necessary precautionary steps to maintain the public safety and welfare. D) The proposed use will require no variances to the required standards set forth in Section 10.31r Subdivision 3 (C). E) The existing dock/deck will not be expanded and will maintain its present configuration. The dock shall sustain structural repairs only. F) The only flat usable land portion of lakeshore is 15-20' above the lake level. The swimming dock provides area for parents to supervise children swimming in lake. G) The large, rocky shoreline prevents persons from using existing shoreline. 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a day use recreation area with occasional overnight camping will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 Ii oo CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3006 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in »his zoning district; that granting the variances for the repair of an existing swimming dock would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air a fire hazard or other danager to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience but is necessary to alleviate a difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with spirit and intent of the zoning code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered these applications including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of ®PP^3-^J"^ and the affect of the proposed use on the health, satetyr and welfare of the community. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipa zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) to permit a <Say “f® recreation area with occasional overnight camping at Record Lots 12 and 19, Big Island, for Big Island Inc., subject to the following conditions; 1. Big Island Inc. shall be limited to 15 slips at th® shared joint use dock. Any attempt to increase the of slips shall require an amendment of this conditional use permit and the filing of a new conditional use permit wit the appropriate notice to adjacent property owners# 2. Applicant shall file a special lot combination of Record Lots 12 and 19 with the City. 3. If at any time a special ^ 5®J”Jv^^aattendance of more than 100 users at the facili T' responsible agent of the association shall apply for a g assembly permit at the City of Orono. Page 3 of 5 o o » 'i' > "fii' _ ^ \ '.1 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3006 existing system meets needs of approved day use recreation area. 5. Applicant shall provide immediate fire protection for fire ring shown on site plan. Such protection is subject to the special standards developed for Island by the City of Orono's building department. This protection shall consist of a supply of sand, water, bucket and blanket. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for submitting all proposed changes in bylaws related to membership to City f review prior to formal action by board of Big Island Inc. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be^completed within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 26, 1992). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a of the Zoning Code, shall automatically authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned representative of Big Island Inc. has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms o resolution and on behalf of Big Island Inc., its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of August, 1991. 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & I Associates Engineers & Architects 8or*esr»jo AuocuKe^ *fH ^ A*fi. fr«r ,e A.r»on/€QuJ« C'OOo'ru»':r, Oro G Pf • C An<i^.k pf • V.«'v>n l \c»-. ®E • ff.vi'.- :E T .'**r Pr • . *r'' ® ';• ?£ • N.:yri j v.-^' •'r ‘ • A B;;u 35'' rim 7^te»^r W Pc’.e^e. ?E :»wS3r* V Eoe*^ *r CPA Cor*;u»f-<^ C. P;iOfP'«'>c»p.»»v A G- P£ W ^2Ste< ® £ • Das J O touotj. P £ • ^jte t C Pu»^«h V ;r,»et T !?c*-r''P £ • n pij P £ 0?^>cei Si JlOfc^e«rf #na Wk V\ • VtOuon w: July 19. 1996 • ?? 3feff * »»f • s-^ 40„, t'' City of Orono 2750 Kelly Pkwy Orono, MN 55232 AUG 5 139G Re: Lift Station No. 28 Renovation BRA File No. 13968 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Bids were opened for the afore mentioned project on Friday, July 19. 1996. Transmitted herewith are ten (10) copies of the bid tabulation for your information and file. The following summarizes the results of the low three bids received: Low Ford Construction, Inc. $69,872.00 #2 GHT Construction, Inc. $77,860.00 #3 J & D Enterprises of Duluth, Inc. $81,620.00 The low bidder on the project was Ford Construction, Inc. with a Base Bid of $69,872.00. This compares favorably with the engineer’s estimate of $70,000.00. These bids have been reviewed and found to be in order. We are therefore recommending that the City of Orono award this project to Ford Construction, Inc. for the amount of $69,872.00. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 636-4600. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mi/A UJA- Mark D. Wallis, P.E. MDW:PAH:ENC 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 ■ 612-636-4600 , .a BTW«w I *ar*-««-aa ■ Bonesi Assodata Prokct Name Lift Station No. 28 Renovation Project No.File No. 13968 Bid Opening.. 10:00 a.m.. C.D.S.T.. Friday. July 19, 1996 Owner City of Orono / hereby certify that this is an exact / /) / T n y reproduction of bids received. Mark D. Wallis, P.E. Registration No. 19145 BID TABULATION Tabulation of Three Low Bids of Three Received No. Item Unit Qty. Bid No. 1 Ford Construction .Inc. Bid No. 2 GHT Construction Inc. Bid No. 3 J & D Enterprises of Duluth, Inc. Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Base Bid • Lift Station Renovation 1 Install sod SY 50 5.00 250.00 4.00 200.00 7.00 350.00 2 Install 6" sidewalk SF 75 400 300 00 800 600 00 1000 750 00 3 Install 3/4“ rock drive CY 4 25 00 100 00 30 00 120 00 3000 120 00 4 Install 6'Colorado Blue Spruce EA 3 400.00 1.200.00 450.00 1.350.00 400.00 1.200.00 S Provide temporary controls, pumps and piping for interior conveyance LS I 4.000 00 4.000 00 5.490 00 5.490 00 9,000 00 9.000 00 6 Provide lift station demolition LS 1 2.500.00 2.500.004.400 00 4.400.00 6.000.00 6.000.00 7 Install new pumps, piping, valves, top hatch and slab per Section 11306 LS I 35.522 00 35.52200 36.500 00 36.500 00 33.300.00 33.300 00 8 Install new control panel, base slab per Section 16903, including base bid dialer LS 1 26.000.00 26.000 00 29.200.00 29,200 00 30.900.00 30.900.00 Total Base Bid $69,872.00 $77.860 00 S8 1.620 00 Alternate No. 1 9 Provide improved telephone dialer specified in Section 16903 LS 1 700.00 700.00 1.560.00 1.560.00 0.00 000 Total Alternate No. 1 700.00 1.560.00 so.oo Alternate Equipment Bids 10 Item Pumps/Comrois Pumps/Concrots Pumps Manufacturer ABS/Professional Meyers/Healy Ruff F.E. Myers Deduct <52.000 00)($5.600 00)($2.000 00) 1 1 Item Pumps/Controls Controls Manufacturer Myers/Healy Ruff Healy Ruff Deduct ($4.000 00)($6,500.00) Firm Name Ford Consiruciion. Inc.GHT Construction. Inc.J & D Enterprises of Duluth Address POBor 667; 1711 E. Kochnen 2750- 102nd St SE 5197 Lavaque Road City. State. Zip Excelsior. .MN 55331-0667 Delano. MN 55328 Duluth. MN 55803 By Lance R. Ford G.H. Theisen Dale Cich Tide President President Secretary Phone 612 470.9613 612.955 3826 218.729.9105 Fm 612 470 9631 612955.2083 218.729 7296 5% Bid Bond. Cert. Check. Cash Deposit Bid bond Bid bond Bid bond I3968BT.WB2 ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects do'^est'<K> Rcse^e Anje» *» au .??-V' AiT 0«-F<3uAI OpOO*fun»% f-^OIOvei P-'«v Otto G Bc^<f • P £ • A« oe » P£ • V* •' * iy%»» " f • C fuPE • f coo* P£ • 6 Soyri t f • «DC«r: G ^ r*‘l. f I • je"> A non P t • 9:o« • a 9u\tn« P i Ww'n V Cl>e»?«n CPA Sen^o’ 1^ Attoc'Me ^*nc{Miv Ho-^<*nA Ff • «te n A G>^tSdi ri • k^nc--: P Ffe^*»**e Pf • P.CfiA'.l W Ps^?e Ff • r.»v.J ■ F f. • "''D^T c F. t* ^'A •V«**.A H,.- . £ ■ T P £ » Tc-; « • I ^ PE f Offices St F.*cii Foc^esre- #nij VN • veuwon wi %'A July 22,1996 Mr. John Gerhardson City of Orono 2750 Kelly Pkwy Orono. MN 55323 s-^ -Z^/. V\ \ Re: Kelly Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvements Our File No. 13982 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the 1“ request for payment for the Kelly Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvements. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very Truly Yours, BONES SENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO:se JUL ' 4 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 ■ 612-636-4600 R Bonaii oa nAndrttC rlAaodMd W W livt • For Period:Start to July 22. 1996 uaic: juiy zz, iwo Request No: 1 Conttlctor Widmc !nc., P.O. Box 219. St Bonifacius, Minnesoca 55375 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT KELLY AVENUE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS File No. 13982 SUMMARY I Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 5% Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 $ $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Approved by Contractor: Widmer Inc. Approved by Owner: City of Orono 40.595.50 40.595.50 23.913.50 0.00 23.913.50 1.195.68 22.717.83 0.00 22.717.83 Specified Contract Completion Date:Date: l:\139M 3982\REQUEST.WB2 No. Itcn 1 8" PVC. (y-S ’ deep in place 2 8" P.E., 8’-10 ’ deep in place 3 8"P.E.. Iff 12* deep in place 4 8" P.E. 12*-14’ deep in place 5 SuL MH 8* deep. 4’ dia.. w/l642B cstg. 6 Manhole Depth greater than 8* deep 7 Connect to existing 8" VCP 8 Remove A dispose of existing sanitary sewer MH 9 Light weight aggregate or woodchip Contract Unit Qvantity Amount Unit Quantity Price to Date UiDate LF 373 26.50 373 9.884.50 LF 105 32.00 48 1.536.00 LF 30 32.00 0 LF 40 32.00 0 EA 2 1.100.00 2 2.200.00 LF 4.9 75.00 0.50 37.50 EA 3 150.00 3 450.00 0.00 EA 2 150.00 1 150.00 bedding LF 150 20.00 189 10 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch EA 6 300.00 2 11 4" PVC service pipe in place LF 160 15.00 37 12 4" PVC riser pipe for service LF 20 25.00 10 13 Connect to existing 4" service line EA 6 150.00 2 14 Improved pipe fnd. per 6" increment depth LF 500 1.50 350 15 Mechanical trench compaction LF 708 1.00 458 16 Erosion control fence LF 800 1.50 0 17 Seeding with topsoil, mulch A fertilizer AC 0.25 1.200.00 0 18 Sod with topsoil SY 2.000 2.25 0 19 Remove and dispose of existing bituminous SY 750 2.25 750 20 Sanitary sewer television inspection LF 548 1.00 0 21 Removal and disposal of unsuiuble material CY 500 4.00 0 22 Clearing and grubbing LS 1 1.500.00 1 0.00 3,780.00 600.00 555.00 250.00 300.00 525.00 458.00 1.687.50 1.500.00 V Total Work Completed to Date $23^13.50 l:\139\13982VnEQUEST.WB2 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner City of Orono Project No. 13982 FUeNo. 13982 Contractor Widmer Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No.Date Dcscripdoo Amount 1 2 3 Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. Period Payment Retainage Completed 1 Start 07/22/96 22,717.83 1,195.68 23,913.50 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $22,717.83 Original Contract $40,595.50 Rctainagc, Payment No. 1 1,195.68 Change Orders Total Amount Earned $23,913.50 Revised Contract $40,595.50 l:\139\13d82\REOUEST.WB2 ^ J Bonestroo Rosene mn ■ Anderlik & |\ I Associates Engineers & Architects »cir*'e A-Je-1* me >i ^ Afft-Tvirfve V.;jn.f ou^ Ooc^ * t-T'c Oiro G •.)r>ntr9<- 1 • c ieo^ C . «r • . ^ j. ,o v^ * •’i • f f • r-..'V Pf V.Ar. » t • ffahe't “ '’. ! e / * 4on t • ct • A P £ a»>;2 Ww'' M tre* .- CPA V»**sr Co»Mu<ti»rni As<*>C*»f^ H WifO'd • «e«T*' A 3or<tO^ ** £ ** f • » »oste» ® E • 0^»d O L0S«OM P £ • C •.!■♦ a . * « a « t v«c*'4*ei * f4*ut'**Ar»* p £ • Te-t t c=e. J p E /O Ot*'cei Si P^* P'.l*••!*'.•«•■ #n<3 VN ■ Me^uC" W’ s.- V ♦'♦-■,N August I, 1996 -•4/1/1/ «*/•/•%/* »-»• y vj*-y vv/> I V% ■^t> City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 c:. Attn; John Gerhardson Re: 1996 Seal Coat Project Our File No. 13983 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) signed copies of the first and final request for payment for the 1996 Seal Coat Project. This work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Very truly yours. BONES 100.10SEI«. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO:la Enclosure 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 551 13-3898 ■ 612-636-4600 L w- •• HI Owner:City of Orono. Box 66. Crystal. Minnesou 55323 Date:July 23. 1996 For Period.Start to July 23.1996 Request No:1/Final * ContriKtor:Allied Blacktop. 10503 89th Avenue N. Maple Grove. MN 55369 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 1996 SEAL COAT File No. 13983 SUMMARY I Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 3 4 5 6 7 s $ I/Final $ S S s $ $ $ $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTKOO JIOSENE, A^ERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: Allied Blacktop Approved by Owner: City of Orono Specified Contract Completion Date:Date: 44.270.00 44.270.00 34.401.26 0.00 34.401.26 0.00 34.401.26 0.00 34.401.26 l:\139\13983\REQUEST.WB2 No. Contract Unit Qaantlty Item Unit Qtumtity Price to Date 1 Bituminous material for seal coat GL 23,000 0.79 17.534 2 FA-2 seal coat aggregate. Class A Total Work Completed to Date TN 1.200 21.75 944.80 Anoont toDatt 13.831.86 20.549.40 $34,401.26 l:\139M3983\REQUEST.WB2 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner City of Oroao Project No. 13983 FUeNa 13983 Contractor Allied Blacktop CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount 1 2 3 Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 Start 07/23/96 34,401.26 34,401.26 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $34,401.26 Original Contract $44,270.00 Retainage. Payment No. I/Final Change Orders Total Amount Earned $34,401.26 Revised Contract $44,270.00 l:\139M3983tftEQUEST.WB2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 8, 1996ie r ITEM NO: / f Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report ItenTDescription: John O’Sullivan Appeal of Local SAC and WAC Charges Local Sewer and Water Adjustment Charges On April 22, 1996, the Council adopted an amendment to the city’s fee schedule to establish local sewer and water adjustment charges. These charges are collected when a non-residential property undergoes an intensification of use that results in a significant increase in water and sewer usage. The fee amount is $900.00 per unit for additional sewer flows and $900.00 per unit for additional water usage. This is a one time charge collected at the time the building permit is issued. Appeal of Local SAC and WAC Charges The first redevelopment project to be affected by the new fees is the O’Sullivan development at 3340 Shoreline Drive. The total water and sewer adjustment charges for the development are $39,879. This is a substantial cost due to the dramatic increase in sewer and water usage resulting from the proposed development. The usage will increase from approximately 4 units to 26 units. Mr. O’Sullivan was unaware of the local SAC and WAC charges at the time of his building permit application. He strongly questioned the necessity and magnitude of the fees, and requested his payment of the fees be delayed until he had an opportunity to appeal the fees to the City Council. Staff agreed to issue the building permit without payment of the fees subject to the results of the appeal. Background of Local SAC and WAC Charges The local SAC and WAC charges initially were considered as part of a discussion regarding the consolidation of the city’s many sewer connection charges for the various sewer projects. Whenever an undeveloped residential property is connected to the city’s sewer system, that property is charged the initial amount assessed to the area for sewer service adjusted to today’s dollars. This cost generally ranges from $5,000 to $25,000 per unit. This discussion led to a discussion about how to treat commercial property that may have originally been assessed for a small number of sewer units, but is being redeveloped to a more intense use that results in significantly increased water and sewer usage. One option considered was to charge the original per-unit assessment amount for each additional unit of usage. Staff felt this amount, which could be thousands of dollars per unit, was too high. ¥ Request for Council Action page 2 of 2 August 8, 1996 John O’Sullivan Appeal of Local SAC and WAC Charges Staff then surveyed other cities to get an idea of what a reasonable fee would be. Fees in other cities are generally in the range of $200.00 to $1,500.00 per unit (please see the attached survey). Based on this range, staff recomuieiided the local access charge be tied to the Metropolitan Council ’s SAC charge which is $900.00 pe*" unit. The purpose of the local SAC and WAC charges is to collect revenue to accurately reflect the level of usage of the water and sewer system, in relation to the cost of constructing the system. Regular sewer and water fees reflect the cost of maintaining and repairing existing lines, facilities, etc. The local SAC and WAC charges reflect the costs of both the initial installation of lines and facilities, and the future replacement and expansion of the lines and facilities. It is important that these fees be collected at the time the expansion of usage by individual properties occuis. These funds can then be set aside to cover at least a portion of the cost of the future expansion or replacement of the system. If this does not happen, development may continue to intensify with no plan for addressing capacity expansion needs until the specific development occurs which requires the expansion. TTie result of this would be either that the last development would have to pay the full cost of the expansion, or the city would be placed in the position of trying to assess the benefitti d properties for the expansion project. This could be very difficult since those properties that had been able to expand their sewer and water usage prior to the need for the expansion project would make the case that the expansion is not benefitting them. A somewhat similar situation, but dealing with new development, is the sewer expansion for the Highway 12 area. This sewer expansion was planned so that the cost was built into a connection charge that is collected at the time development occurs in the area to be served by the sewer expansion. The amount of the connection charge related to the sewer expansion was set at $1,200.00 per unit. Staff Recommendation It is reasonable that a developer should make some form of payment related to city sewer and water capacity and availability when the development results in a substantial increase in water and sewer usage. The $900 per unit SAC and WAC charges, while being toward the high end of what other cities charge, are still a reasonable cost for sewer and water servic ’f the O’Sullivan development was occurring in the Highway 12 area, the sewer and water connection charges would be over $8,000 per unit (sewer and water combined). This would result in a total cost exceeding $176,000. It is staffs recommendation that the local SAC and WAC charges remain at the current level and that those charges related to the O’Sullivan development be paid. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to deny the appeal of John O’Sullivan of the local SAC and WAC charges related to his development project at 3340 Shoreline Drive. ¥■IJfc 1994 LOCAL SEWER AMD WATER ACCESS FEES (per \init) Monticello Albertville Buffalo Big Lake Elk River Rockford Watertovm Belle Plaine Hutchinson Norwood Haconia I Hater Access Pee $ 500 $5,200 $ 600 $450 $1,070 $1,000 $400 $750 $500 $500 $655 Sewer Access Pee $1,200 $1,500 $1,100 $450 $1,300 $ 850 $300 $750 $500 $200 $480 IL N REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 8, ITEM NO: / - Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: S ____ Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Internal Trails on the "Dickey Property" portion of the Crystal Bay Addition Subdivision The subdivision of the Dickey property by Tandem Properties included several internal trails as part of the subdivision to serve both the residents of the subdivision and the general public. The trails as shown on the plat provide pedestrian access to the Luce Line Trail and adjacent DNR open space, and to the three acre public open space parcel on Watertown Road. The subdivision plat includes public easements over these trails to ensure public access to the trails. These trails have not be installed at this point. It is staffs understanding that these trails are to be constructed as part of the subdivision. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the developer to install these trails as indicated on the plat. In recent discussions with Dick Putnam of Tandem Properties, with the purpose of determining 'the type of surface to be installed on the trails, Mr. Putnam indicated it is his understanding that the Council, prior to or as part of its final action on the subdivision, determined that the internal trails should not be constructed on the Dickey property. It is his recollection that this determination was based on opposition to the internal trails by the residents of Country Side Drive. Since this understanding differs from staffs understanding, and it appears to be different from what is reflected in the Council meeting minutes regarding the subdivision, staff is requesting clarification from the Council regarding whether the Council ’s approval of the subdivision included the construction of the internal trails on the Dickey property. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to clarify the Council ’s intent regarding the construction of the internal trails on the Dickey property portion of the Crystal Bay Addition subdivision. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 7, 1996N, ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin rule City Clerk Item Description: Admioistcator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Appointment of Election Judges for Primary' Election - September 10, 1996 Attachment; Proposed Resolution Appointing Election Judges for the September 10, 1996, Primary Election Background State Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2, states that the City must appoint election judges for the upcoming primary election 25 days prior to the election. Recommendation It is staffs recommendation Council adopt the attached resolution listing the names of qualified persons who have indicated their willingness to serve as election judges at the primary election September 10, 1996. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion lO approve Resolution No.__appointing election judges for the September 10, 1996, primary election. Ayes _, nays_. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 BE iT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws 204B.21, Subd. 2, tlie following persons are appointed as election judges for the Primary Election to be held September 10, 1996. A1 Ackermann Mary Butler Bonnie David Barbara Ericson Eleanor L. Ferril Eldon Freese Carolyn Graham Lee Lathrop Julia Sherf Helen Toward Sally Valiton Vemice Berg Michael Butler Ruth D. Eisinger James Erler Wanda i schback Barbara Garcia John Larson Sue Lurton Marilyn Thome R. William Toward Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held August 12, 1996. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Crry REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ DATE: August 8. ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administr^uor’s Report Item Description: 1997 Assessment Contract The contract with Rolf Erickson Enterprises for city assessing services rxins from September through August. The contract is due for renewal on September 1, 1996. A proposal from Rdf Erickson Enterprises for assessing services for a one year term beginning September 1, 1996 and ending August 31, 1997 is attached. The proposed cost is $78,000. This is a 2% increase over the current contract amount. Staff recommends approval of the contract proposal. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to renew the contract with Rolf Erickson Enterprises for city assessing services for the term September 1, 1996 through August 31, 1997 at a cost of $78,000. - I . i L TO: Ron Moorse, Orono City Administrator For the Orono Mayor and City Counci1 members FROM:RoHf Rolf Erickson, Orono City Erickson Enterprises DATE:Jul y 17, 1996 RE:1997 Assessment Contract Term of Contract: September 1, 1996 through August 31, 1997 Current Contract amiount:t76,500.00 Requested amount for 1997 Assessrrient:t78,000.00 C(s^CC>/tyya ) Number of new houses In 1996 My request for increase is based on the following two factors. Cost of 1iuing/doing business Cost of appraising new properties TOTAL .OO’/O Total •tl ,500.00 Please consider this request at the next City Council meeting that you consider appropriate. If you have any questions or the Council requests rriy presence at a meeting please call. 1 I t REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AUg ***77/ isse DATE: August 8, ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator's Repon Item Description: Additional Sampling Work at the Former City Hall Monitoring Well The MPCA is requiring an additional two quarters of sampling from the ground water monitoring well at the former city hall site. A proposal from Braun Intertec for the sampling and reporting is attached. The cost for this additional sampling is $1,640.80. The proposal from Braun indicates that the second quarterly report will contain a recommendation for site closure and no further work, if the benzene concentrations remain stable or decrease in the ground water sample. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the proposal from Braun Intertec for two additional quarters of ground water sampling at a cost of $1,640.80 to be funded from the building outlay fund, and to amend the budget to reflect this expenditure. I J • BRAUN INTERTEC Brown Inloftwc Cor»*OfO»««n 1 3A3 Northlond Dnv* Mandola M.nn«$oio 33120-1 U1 612-6834700 fox: 6834888 Enj.nMn end Sctenf^fi Stnnng lh» Built and l^aKirol Env.ronm*n« July 19. 1996 fJUL 2 2 1926 Project Mo. CNtKX-93-Ol63 aty olotono Wot>“ Department P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gerhardsoir;Dear Mr. ueruarusuu. MPCA Leak No. 00006933 investigation activities to be conducted at the referenecQ j- Tnve *a.ion on July 15 1996 ''^Tlnet the letter dated monitoring well MW-4 for two additional quarters in re f July 8. 1996. Scope of Work Braun Intertec preposea the following scope of worlc to for monitoring of well MW^t . Sample monitoring well MW-t for and xylenes Sd^r‘sZlea win - STe S^dtie two groundwater sampling e and will be analyzed for BEiX. . Collect water levels in all site monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-5) during the two quarterly groundwater sampling events. . Upon receiving each of the two sets of Jertec will prepare Quarterly Monitoring Reports in accoraan guidelines. rem?:^nirsrofd“r I City of Orono Public Works Department Project No. CMKX-93-0163 July 19. 1996 Page 2 Cost Estimate listed below are the total project cost estimates for the anticipated work at the site. Service Description Cost Estimate Consulting Services Laboratory Services SI.320.80 320.00 Project Total $1,640.80 If you have any questions regarding this cost estimate, please contact me at (612) 683-8866 Sincerely, Gregerfy S. Browne Project Manager, Hydrogeologist i;\*wpnies\cml«\93-0163\0163. L04 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^Uq 4^ DATE: Ai§to,19% ITEM NO X / C=> Department Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron TItk: Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:wt Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: y McCulley Road Property - Recommended Subdiv ision Layout On July 8 Council authorized the expenditure of up to $3,500 for the survey, plat and variance work necessarv' to subdivide the 34-acrc McCulley Road property. At that time staff indicated the City may benefit by dividing this land into a number of separate tax parcels. The attached diagrams indicate two possible division schemes for the property taking into account the following factors: 1. 3. 4. 5. The possible building site in the northeast quadrant of the property appears to contain approximately 3.1 acres of dr)’ buildable land (not the 4.6 acres shown on the 1987 survey) based on City topographic maps. This difference is mainly due to the "ballpark" interpretation of wetland boundaries done in 1987 without the benefit of a topo map. This lot w*!!! require an area variance as it is in the 5-acre zone. The building site had septic testing done in 1987, finding primary and alternate sites for mound systems. Weckman will review the testing information to confirm its validity as part of thie subdivision process. No system design work was done with the testing; this also needs to be done by a site evaluator in order for us to sell a fully approved building lot. All wetlands on the entire 34-acre property should be delineated as part of the subdivision, as this will identify any potential 'surprises' with the building site and help define the areas we may wish to use for future mitigation sites. Inclusion of additional wetland acreage with the buildable lot will likely enhance its value to a buyer. We would place a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands prior to the sale. Large portions of the property (mainly west of McCulley Road) were originally wetlands but were filled to create the roadbed or were used for disposal of spoils. These spoils sites might be suitable for future wetland restoration. Also, some of the adjacent natural high ground could likely be used as a location to create new w’etlands for mitigation of City projects involving wetlands. 1 6.The City negotiated with the DNR during 1978-1981 in an attempt to sell to DNR a portion of the prop>erty for the parking lot near the Luce Line Trail. DNR would not buy it due to certain deed restrictions insisted upon by the Council, which would have prohibited permanent structures and required DNR to sell it back to the City if it was ever sold. Since DNR did not accept, the parking area is still owned and maintained by Orono, and DNR has no easement over it. The attached concept plans show one option with a parcel for possible sale to to DNR, another option without. 7.It w ould be in the Citj 's best interest to retain the triangular areas of property either side of the road near the Luce Line where extensive fill w as needed outside the 100' right-of-way. The drainage culverts would also then remain on City projserty. Based on the above information, two optional subdivision schemes are presented for Council consideration. A decision is needed on which option to proceed with so that we can present the proposed plan to various surveyors for bids. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct staff as to which subdivision scheme should be pursued. Option 1: Lot 1 (Building Site)....................................16.3 acres (3.1 ac dry, 13.2 ac wet) Outlet A (Right-of-way parcel) ................. 0.7 acre Outlet B (Right-of-way and future wetland mitigation parcel).....16.8 acres 33.8 acres Outlot Option 2: OmiL “'y- '3-2 “ 'V'O Outlet B (Right-of-way parcel) ............................. q.5 acre Outlot C (Sell to DNR for parking lot) ................. 2.3 acres Outlot D (Future wetland mitigation parcel).......... 14 0 aerp^ 33.8 acres REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^0. ^(k.J996^DATE: Augu^^l996 ITEM NO:7 J996" Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Itm Description: Administrator Reviewed:m Agenda Section: Administrator's Report Selection of a Date for a Work Session to Discuss County Roadway Projects Hennepin County DOT has now completed a detailed design plan for the reconstruction of County Road 6 from Highway 12 to Townline Road, including the redesign of the Watertown Road intersection. County staff are available to meet with the Council to review the design plan. The Council may want to schedule a work session the week of August 19 or August 26 to review the plan. The County is also prepared to provide an update regarding the County Road 15 project if the Council wants to include that project as part of the work session agenda. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to select a date and time for a Council work session to review County roadway plans. A X REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 7 DATE: Augusn^M^ ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Dorothy Hallin Licenses Tide City Clerk Item Description:/ List of Licenses for Council Approval One Day Liquor License Smith College Club Minnetonka Center for the Arts 2240 North Shore Drive "Smith Day" September 7, 1996 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve above listed license Date:August 6,1996 To: From: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: One Day Liquor License I have reviewed the application of Linda Feltes on behalf of the Smith College Club to obtain a one day liquor license for an event at the Minnetonka Center for the Arts. The organization has held this event for many years with no problems. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. PS-09079 (5/93)Minnesota Depanrr.ent of Public Safe^/ LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 190 SV". St. E.. St. Paul. MN 55101 (612)295-5430 700(512)297-2100 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FORA 1 to 3 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE • TKfe rnim i i.'herv^n.-mAAi iw‘'« NAME OF organization •Ti'TI'I < - 1 IjJ'k . L lt'r» <''/ /M/i")/U• 1 DATE ORGANIZED! n NO. OF members ^\CC TAX EXEMPT NU.V8E: ^ 1 * l'^r'C,2S^ STREET ADDRESS ^T<‘LiiyJ<r> Tritc'-u £ In- €-. if‘i 1 9'^'*1 Srf fC i V f STATE A//L :i»coo! UncTfrt t: s 'S o DATES LIQUOfl WIU8E SOLO’ O TO 3 DAYS) (r:Ji 7 ________________________ I DOES 0AGA.M2AT10N' HAVE A CHAt^TER ( GENERAL PURPOSE OF 0«Gamzat IC Yes z N: II >:«•*» f ri - CRGANI2ATIO.'.' 0FF:C£R'S NAME / <r» c I<1 1 / I V *1 r^C / ADDRESS 2,iC OROANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ^ fK ], t i TVI n — V ^ f > address t-2»7 **> P,' Fi lif-kri ORGANIZATION OFFICER’S NAME ADDRESS ^ ^ _ *■> 7 ^ LO ^ Yv:;v-> , { Pci ( CK f <' Location wh^rt licenaa w»ll b« If an outdoor area, describe. M,rniU.tc.nl<n Ak ‘<C Ll'r^‘ il\W v/ill the applicant contract for intoxicating l.cuor services? If so. give the nawe address of the Uouor licensee providif'g the services. hsiO Will the applicant cat/V liouor liability insurance? if so. the carrier’s narne and amount 0? coverage. I.Note;lnsuranc« is not mandatorvl K'> r.TvnP (£)^O0 DATE APPROVED---------------------------------------------------------------- ^/T ^ ®riTV tcc amouwt ^^ -------LICENSE DATES____________—--------------------------- “ DATE FE= PAID . . _ • APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR SIGNATURE CITY CLERK ____________________________________________________ Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed oy NOTE: ^ returned as the license. Submit to the City Clerk at leist 30 days be'ore the event. ___— TOTPL P.Ol i r: I 29 Jul 1996 Mon 10:5'. AM Check Humber Check Humber 51959 Check Reglfttr City of Orono Date Name 51959 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 31-Jul-96 CITY (XXJNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check N’jmber 51959 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Nuatber 51960 51960 51960 5196C FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 31-JU1-96 31-JU1-96 31-Jul-96 Totals Check NUfriber FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 51960 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Numbcjr 51961 51961 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 31-Jul-96 Totals Check Humber CHEAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO, 51961 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO, Check Number 51962 51962 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL 31-Jul-96 Totals Check Number HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL 51962 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL Check Number 51963 51963 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL 31-Jul 96 Totals Check Number HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL 51963 KE.\*NEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL Check Number 51964 51964 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 31-Jul-96 Totals Check Number ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 51964 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 51965 51965 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 31-Jul-96 Totals Check Number LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 51965 LAW ENFORIMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 51966 51966 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 31-Jul-96 Totals Check Number MN DEPT OF REVENUE 51966 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 51967 51967 MN MUTUAL LIFE 3l-Jul-96 Totals Check Number MN MUTUAL LIFE 51967 MN MUTUAL LIFE Transactloa Amount 5.744.00 5.744.00 3.057.22 3.057.22 7.147.93 13.262.37 1.190.00 1.190.00 164.82 164.82 184.50 184.50 100.00 100.00 462.00 462.00 3.012.64 3.012.64 55.00 55.00 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFT RED PICA k MEDICARE W/H FICA.MEDCR Cl*^ SHARE FEDERAL HITIOIOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H THOMTON SC0266780 SKREEN 8C0262310 DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES W/H STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H 29 Jul 19H mn 10:S9 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Q*eck Number 519€8 51968 STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 31-Jul-96 m STATE RETIRE«3rr-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 51968 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF CCMP Check Number 51969 PEBSCO/OBRA 51959 31-Ju1-96 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 51969 PEBSCO/OBRA Check SUadber 51970 PEBSCO/OS COrfF OP MAYORS 51970 31-Jul-95 PEBSCO/U5 COTF OP MAYORS Totals Check Number S1970 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS Check Number 51971 PERA 51971 51971 31-Jul-95 31-JU1-96 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 51971 PERA Check Number 51972 ST. CROIX COUNTY 51972 31-Jul-96 ST. CROIX COUNTY Totals Check Number 51972 ST. CROIX COUNTY Check Number 51973 UNITED NAY 51973 31-Jul-96 UNITED HAY Totals Check NurC er 51973 UNITED NAY Grand Total Transact Ion Amount 150.00 150.00 228.II 228.13 1.892.50 1*892.50 3*775.94 4*952.09 8*729.03 74.44 74.44 29.00 29.00 35,278 43 1Page 2 Comments DEFERS^ COMP H/H OBRA DEFERRED COMP H/H USCN DtPSRRRO COMP H/H PERA DiPLOYSB H/H PERA CITY SHARE CHILD SUPPORT-SCHULTZ CHARITY DONATIONS H/H 6 Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Regltter City of Orono Page 1 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amouiit Comments Check Number 51974 51974 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 08-Aug-96 AIRTCUCH CELLULAR Totals Cheok Nuir^ber 51974 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Check Number 51975 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 431.4T 431.47 CELL PHOKE CHARGES 51975 51975 C9-Aug-96 OB-Aug-96 ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC 902.51 832.19 tjNDERGROaND REPAIR L.S. #6 REPLACE STARTERS Totals Check N^umber 51975 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Check Number 51976 ALLIED BLACKTOP 1.734.70 51976 51976 51976 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 OB-Aug-96 ALLIED BLACKTOP ALLIED BLACKTOP ALLIED BLACKTOP 1.500.00 3.370.00 29.531.26 OXFORD ROAD OVERLAY PARKING LOT OVERLAY SEALCOATING-STREETS Totals Check Number 51976 ALLIED BLACKTOP Check Number 51977 AT E T COmUHER PRODUCTS DIV 51977 08-Aug-96 AT E T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV Totals Check Number 51977 AT E T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV Check Number 51978 ATET 34.401.26 19.55 19.55 LONG DISTANCE Totals Check Number 51980 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Check Number 51981 BEACK. SCOTT 51981 08-Aug-96 BEACK. SCOTT 132.88 228.00 GOLF BALLS FOR RESALE 1a 1 51978 08-Aug-96 ATfcT 1.70 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 51978 08-Aug-96 ATET 5.30 LONG DISTANCE 51978 08-Aug-96 AT&T 81.56 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES Totals Check Number 51978 ATET 88.56 Check Number 51979 ATET WIRELESS SERVICES 51979 08-Aug-96 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.46 CELL PHONE CHARGES 51979 08-Aug-96 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.45 CELL PHONE CHARGES 51979 08-Aug-96 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 67.54 CELL PHONE CHARGES Totals Check Number 51979 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 78.45 Check Number 51980 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 51980 06-Aug-96 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 60.78 SANDWICHES FOR RESALE 51980 08-Aug-96 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 39.50 COFFEE FOR RESALE 51980 08-Aug-96 AUGIES MOBILF CHEF 32.60 SANDWICHES FOR RESALE • Aug 1996 Thy 4:16 PW ChtcX Eusbcr D«t9 Check Register City of Crono Transaction Amount Page 2 Cc •'wents Check SUinber S19S1 B£ACK« SCOTT Totals Check SOinber S19B1 BEACK. SCOTT 22B.00 Check SAtmber 51962 BENEFITS DESIGN GROUP S1982 Oi-Aug-96 Totals Check Number BENEFITS DESIGN GROUP 51992 BEimFITS DESIGN GROUP 1.573.19 1.573.19 AmiH FEB Check Number 51993 BETTE^RF ROICRER KNOCHE INC. 51983 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Nv!mber BETTENDORF RCHRER KNOCHE INC 51983 BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE INC 1.500.00 1.500.00 APPRAISAL-1055 MIlXHURST Check Number 51984 BIFFS INC. 51984 51984 51984 51984 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BIFFS INC BIFFS INC 51984 BIFFS INC 130.52 130.52 130.52 65.26 456.82 BEDERWOOD PK-AUGUST AUGUST SERVICE HACKBERRY PK-AUGUST AUGUST SERVICE Check Number 51985 BLACKOWIAK k SON 51985 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number BLACKOWIAK k SON 51985 BLACKOWIAK k SON 150.00 150.00 LEAF PICKUP Check NufTber 51986 BRAW INTERTEC 51986 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number BRAUN INTERTEC 51986 BRAUN INTERTEC 314.10 314.10 PROJECT CMKX-93-0163 Check Number 51987 BROCK WHITE CUMPA'-; 51987 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number BROCK WHITE COHPANY 51987 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 229.32 229.32 PROPEX 4545, TIE WIRE Check Number 51988 BUDGET PRINTING 51988 08-Aug-?6 Totals Check Number BUDGET PRINTING 51989 BUDIET PRINTING 142.50 142.50 INSPECTION NOTICES. REGIS Check Number 51989 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 51989 51989 08-Aug-96 08-AU9-96 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUirriNG BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 228.74 286.66 PAYROLL CHECKS FUND ACCTG CHECKS Totals Check Number 51989 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 515.40 8 Aug 1996 Check Register Page Thu 4:16 PM City of Orono Check Transaction INufO^r Date Name Amount Commenta Check Number 51990 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 51990 08-Aug-94 CHUNK.S LAKESHORE AUTO 205.95 #176 BRAKES 51990 08-Aug-96 CHUNK.S LAKESHORE AUTO 337.16 #171 EXT TENSION HOUSING 51990 08-Aug-96 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 44.13 #170 WIRE FOR SMART TRL 51990 08-Aug-96 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 203.43 #167 BRAKES 51990 08-Aug-96 C3IUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 117.16 #175 TRANSMISSION SRVC. 51990 08-Aug-96 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 166.89 #170 INSTALL BALL k HITCH Totals Check Number 51990 CHUNKS LAKESHORE A'.TO 1,074.72 Check Number 5199X CITYVIEil PULING k KEATING S1991 51991 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 CITY\'IEW PLUMBING k HEATING CITYVIEW PLUMBING k KEATING Totals Check Number 51991 CITYV'IEW PLL’MBING k HEATING Check Number 51993 C0M4EK^i.Aw LIFE INSURANCE Check Number 51995 CT SYSTEMS 51995 08-Aug-96 CT SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 51995 CT SYSTEMS Check Number 51996 CYS UNIFORMS 51996 08-Aug-96 CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check rrumber 51996 CYS UNIFORMS Check Number 51997 51997 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 08-Aug-96 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 173.76 7.93 181.69 1.067.18 1.067.18 220.75 220.75 510.00 SERVICE ON URINALS PVC DRESSER COUPLING 51992 08-Aug-96 COfWRCIAL LIFE INSURANCE 0.85 AUGUST LIFE INSURANCE 51992 08-Aug-96 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE 2.66 ALX3UST LIFE INSURANCE 51992 C8-Aug-96 COfWERCIAL LIFE INSLUkNCE 1. 14 AUGUST LIFE INSURANCE 51992 08-Aug-96 COI«MEkCIAL LIFE INSLTANCE 289.53 AUGUST LIFE INSURANCE Totals Check Number 51992 COfWERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE 294 18 Check Number 51993 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. 51993 08-Aug-96 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC.124.70 REPAIR G.S.#30 Totals Check Number 51993 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC.124.70 Check Number 51994 CONTECH INC. 51994 08-Aug-96 CONTECH INC.1,874.93 PIPE. BANDS 51994 08-Aug-96 CONTECH INC.330.15 PIPE. BANDS Totals Check Number 51994 CONTECH INC.2,205.00 WTR PLANT 83 SOFTENER UNIFOFMIS 2ND QTR CON'IECTION CHG B Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Register Cicy of Orono Check Itumber Date Kame Check Number 51997 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Total! Check Number 51997 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Check Number 51998 E-2 RECYCLING 51998 OB-Aug-96 E-2 RECYCLING Totals Check Number 51998 B-Z RECYCLING Check Number 51999 EARL P. ANDERSON k ASSOC. 51999 51999 51999 51999 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC EARL P. ANDERSON k ASSOC EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC. EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC Totals Check Number 51999 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC Check Number 52000 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS 52000 08-Aug>96 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCT^; Totals Check Number 52000 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Check Number 52001 ENGINEERING CONTACTS 52001 08-Aug-96 ENGINEERING CONTACTS Totals Check Number 52001 ENGINEERING CONTACTS Check Number 52002 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 52002 09-Aug-96 ESS BROTHERS k SONS Tc*:sls Check Number 52002 ESS BROTHERS k SONS Check Numbe.*52003 FEED RITE CONTROLS 52003 52003 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 FEED RITE CONTROL.*; FEED RITE CONTROLS Totals Check Number 52003 FEED RITE CONTROLS Check Number 52004 FERGUSON-KELLER ASSOC. INC. 52004 *^2004 52004 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 FERGUSON-KELLER ASSOC. INC FERGUSON-KELLER 2.SSOC. INC FERGUSON-KELLER ASSOC. INC Totals Check Nurrber 52004 FERGUSON-KELLER ASSOC. INC Check Number 52005 G 6 K SERVICES 520C5 08-Aug-96 G 6 K SERVICES Transaction Amount 510.00 5.422.92 5.422.92 307.44 47.98 68.32 148.64 572.38 182.12 182.12 89.00 89.00 82.01 82.01 71.88 324.80 396.68 39.40 39.40 115.70 192 00 10.28 Page 4 Comments JULY SERVICE •I®TICB* SIGNS OlYSTAL DELINEATOR PRIVA*TE ROAD SIGN S*rOP. SLOW SIGNS MANHOLE-OLD BEACH RD PW DIRECTOR AD AEJUSTMENT RINGS FLUORIDE CHLORINE WADERS. SUSPENDERS WADERS, SUSPENDERS WADERS. SUSPENDERS RATHBUN 8 Aug 1996 Check Register Thu 4:16 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Nun^r Date Name Amount Comments Check Number S2005 0 k K SERVICES 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 73.11 SHOP TOWELS S200S 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENKAGEN 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBW? 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 113.51 STREET EMPLOYEES 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 02.57 FLOOR MATS 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENKAGEN 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN 52005 08-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 68.19 STREET EMPLOYEES 52005 O0-Aug-96 G 4 K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENKAGEN Totals Check Number 52005 G 4 K SERVICES 382.41 Check Number 52006 GALL'S INC. 52006 00-Aug-96 GALL'S INC.20.93 REPLACEMENT BULB Totals Check Number 52006 GALL'S INC.20.93 Page S Check Number 52007 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC. 52007 08-Aug-96 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC Total* Check Number 52007 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC Check Number 52000 GEAR WEST SKI k BIKE 52008 08-Aug-96 GEAR WEST SKI k BIKE Totals ChecK Number 52u08 GEAR WEST SKI k BIKE Check Number 52009 GENUINE PARTS CO. 52009 52009 52009 O0-Aug-96 09-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO Totals Check Number 52009 GENUINE PARTS CO Check Nuff^r 52010 gerring'S car wash 52010 52010 08-Aug-96 O0-Aug-96 C-ERRING'S CAR WASH GERRING'S CAR WASH Totals Check Nurrtber 52010 GERRING'S CAP. WASH Check Number 52011 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 52011 08-Aug-96 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN Total* Check Number 52011 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN aieck Number 5201? HACK CHEMI::AL CO. 52012 C0-Aug-96 HACK CHEMICAL CO. 1.148.56 1 148.56 ’1.90 31.90 67.63 73.96 271.61 413.20 9.94 26.09 36. C 3 120.00 120.00 INSPECT, REPAIR GENERATOR TREK HELMET MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS JUNE CAR WASH TICKETS JULY CAR WASH TICKETS KUEHN-NAT'L MEMBERSHIP 28.96 PWD PILLOWS i Aug 199€ Thu 4:16 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Qieck Ihimber 52012 52012 RACH CHEMICAL CO. 08-Aug-96 HAOi CHEMICAL CO. Totals Check Number 52012 KACH CHEMICAL CO. Check Number 52013 KEALTHPARTNERS 52013 52013 52013 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 HEALTHPARTNERS HEALTHPARTNERS HEALTHPARTNERS Totsis Check Number 52013 HEALTHPARTNERS Check Number 52014 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE 52014 52014 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Totals Check Number 52014 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Check Number 52015 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHEPIFP 52015 08-Aug-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Totals Check Number 52015 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Check Number 520T6 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 52016 08-Aug-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASL’RER Totals Check Number 52016 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Check Number 52017 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 5201-»08-Aug-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR.EAS Totals Check Number 52017 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS Check Number 52018 HURR, JOELLEN L. 52018 08-Aug-96 HURR, JOELLEN L, Totals Check Number 52C18 HURR« JOELLEN L. Check Number 52019 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 52019 08-Aug-96 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Totals Check Number 52019 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Check Number 52020 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT 52020 08-Aug-96 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 52020 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Transaction Amount 57.79 86.75 313.50 2,671.06 1.706.09 4,690.65 38.29 38.29 76.58 163.36 163.36 540.00 540.00 37.50 37.50 111.00 111.00 114.91 114.91 84.97 84.97 Page 6 Comments STD SOL. SEPT HEALTH INSURANCE SEr: HEALTH INSURANCE AUGUST HEALTH INS ATHLETIC MIX ATHLETIC MIX JUNE BOOKING FEES ROOM k BOARD-JUNE PROPERTY OWNER LIST MILEAGE REIMB.-LMC CONF. 8710.708 BATTERIES WTR TEMP. GAUGE i Aug I9f€ Thu 4:16 PM Ch«ck Humber Check Register City of Orono Date ]Sdme Transaction Amount Page 7 Comments Check Humber 52021 52021 LEAGUE OP MH CITIES 00-Aug-96 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Totals Check Humber 52021 LEAGUE OP MS CITIES 1.000 00 1.000.00 RIGHT OF WAT EFFORT Check Humber 52 022 LOHO LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 52022 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 52022 LONG LAKE BIG A ALTO PARTS 8.08 8.08 FAN BELT Check Number 52023 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMEST 52023 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 52023 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 11.01 11.01 PLUGS Check Number 52024 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 52024 52024 08-Aug-96 00-Aug-96 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 400.75 7.05 REPAIR ELGIN BRAKES GREASE FITTING Totals Check Number 52024 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 415.80 Check Number 520.75 MAGIC CLEANERS 52025 O0-Ang-96 Totals Check Numbei MAGIC CLEA.N’ERS 52C25 MAGIC CLEANERS 40.00 40.00 BLANKET CLEANING Check Number 52026 MEDICA CHOICE 52026 52026 52026 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Numbei MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE :4EDICA CHOICE 52026 MEDICA CHOICE 262.03 112.29 10,777.07 11.15?.19 AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS AUG HEALTH INS rheck Number 52027 MEDTOX LABCilATORIES 52027 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number MEDTOX LABORATORIES 52027 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 35.00 35.00 DEBAERE SCREENING Check Number 52028 52026 52028 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 08-Aug-96 08 - Aug- *>6 Totals Check Number METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION METRO WASTE CONTROL COW^ISSION 520*'8 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 1.732.00 23.746.00 25.528.00 SAC CHARGES-JUNE SEPTEMBER SERVICE Check Number 52029 MICRO AGE 52029 CS-Aug-96 MICRO AGE 27.69 30* DROP CABLE 6 Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Register City of Orono Check number Date Name Oieck Number 52029 MICRO AGE Totals Check Number 52029 MICRO AGE Check Number 52030 MIDWEST ASPHALT 52C30 52030 52030 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 C8-Aug-9€ MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPlUXT MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Number 52030 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Number 52031 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 52031 52031 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING 00 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 52031 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Number 52032 MILLER. CHRIS 52032 08>Aug-96 MILLER, CHRIS Totals Check Number 52C32 MILLER. CHRIS Check Number 52033 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 52033 08-Aug-96 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 52033 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 52C34 MINNEGASCO Check Number 52035 MINT.TISOTA CLE 52035 08-Aug-96 MINNESOTA CLE Tr.-'als Check Number 52035 MINNESOTA CLE Check Number 52036 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 52036 08-Aug-96 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Totals Check Number 52036 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Check Number 52037 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 52037 08-Aug-96 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Transaction Amount 27.€9 408.93 288.11 455.48 1.152.52 259.00 207.95 466.95 36.75 36.75 13.50 13.50 195.00 195.00 74.22 74.22 3.136 00 Page 8 Cofiffiests HAND PATCH HAND PATCH HAND PATCH POP FOR RESALE POP FOR RESALE JULY r ILEAGE REIMB MEDICAL OXYGEN 52034 06-Aug-96 MirWEGASCO 11.33 GAS CHARGES 52034 00-Aug-96 MINNEGASCO 88.74 GAS CHARGES 52034 08-Aug-96 MINNEGASCO 140.63 GAS CHARGES Totals Check Number 52034 MINNEGASCO 240.90 FISCHENICH-CRIMINAL JUST! AUGUST INSURANCE JULY SALES TAX 8 Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 52037 52037 DEPT OF REVENUE 08-Aug-96 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 520 37 MN DEPT OF RE'/ENUE Check Number 52038 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN 52038 08-Aug-96 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Totals Check Number 5203B MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Check Number 52039 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 52039 08-Aug-96 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM Totals Check Number 52039 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM Check Number 52040 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 52040 08-Aug-96 MSP COM^ICATIONS Totals Check Number 52040 MSP COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 52041 NAVARRE HARDWARE Check Number 52042 NORTH STAR TURF 52042 08-Aug-96 NORTH STAR TURF Total* Check Number 52042 NORTH STAR 'TURF Check Number 52C44 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 52044 OS-Aug-96 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Total* Check Number 52044 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Check Number 52045 OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC. Transaction Amount 46.00 3.182.00 160.00 160.00 172.11 172.11 194.00 194.00 62.12 62.12 23.54 23.54 Page 9 Comment* JULY SALES TAX KUEKN-KNGFOA CONFERENCE 2ND QTR-MPRS v». STARKS ADVERTISEMENT S2041 08-Aug-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 89.92 MISC PARTS 52041 08-Aug-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 23.45 MISC PARTS 52041 08-Aug-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 64.42 MISC PARTS 52041 08-Aug-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 137.25 MISC PARTS Total* Check Number 52041 NAVARRE HARDWARE 315.04 SPIKE HAZARD MARKER Check Number 52043 NSP 52043 08-Aug-96 NSP 275.81 NSP CHARGES 52043 08-Aug-96 NSP 3.788.92 NSP CHARGES 52043 08-Aug-96 NSP 659.21 NSP CHARGES 52043 08 -kug-96 NSP 2.121.85 NSP CHARGES Total* Check 52043 NSP 6.845.79 REPAIR GOLF CART TIRE I * I 8 Aug 1996 Thu 4 :16 PM Check Number Check Number 52045 Check Register City of Orono Page 10 Date Name 52045 OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC. 08-Aug-96 OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC Totals Check Number 32045 OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC Check Number 52046 OLD DUTCH FOCDS INC. 52046 52046 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. Totals Check Number 52046 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC, Check Number 52047 OLSON, JOHN C 52047 09-Aug-96 OLSON, JOHN C Totals Check Number 52047 OLSON, JOHN C Check Number 52048 PERA LIFE INSURANCE 52048 08-Aug-96 PERA LIFE INSURANCE Totals Check Number 52048 PERA LIFE INSURANCE Check Number 52049 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR Check Number 52050 52050 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 08-Aug-96 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Totals Check Number 52050 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Transaction Amount 150.64 150.64 16.17 19.25 35.42 18.65 18.65 132.00 132.00 33.00 33.00 Comments REPAIR MOWER CHIPS FOR RESALE CHIPS FOR RESALE OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMB PERA LIFE INSURANCE 52049 08-Aug-96 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 26.63 8176 REPAIR TIRE 52049 Od-Aug-96 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 62.80 8176 TOW, REPAIR TIRE 52049 08-Aug-96 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 101.14 8426 REPAIR SEAL LEAK Totals Check Number 52049 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 190.57 QUESTIONNAIRE BOOKLETS Check Number 52051 PIONEER 52051 08-Aug-96 PIONEER 63.00 APPL 82158 52051 08-Aug-96 PIONEER 66.50 LAND USE APPS 52051 08-Aug-9S PIONEER 31.50 APPL 82156 52051 08-Aug-96 PIONEER 24.50 APPL 82155 52051 O0-Aug-96 PIONEER 49.00 AD FOR BIDS Totals Check Number 52051 PIONEER 234.50 Check Number 52052 PRO TIRF 4 EXHAUST 52052 08-Aug-96 PRO TIRE 4 EXHAUST 22.86 8174 OIL CHAW 52052 08-Aug-96 PRO TIRE 4 EXHAUST 198.48 8171 TIB ROD, 8 Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Number Check Number 52052 52052 Check Register City of Orono Page 11 Date Name 52052 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 09-Aug-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST 08-Aug-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST Totals Check Number 52C52 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST Check Number 52053 RDO EQUIPMEhT CO. 52053 00-Aug-96 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. Totals Check Number 52053 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. Check Number 52054 REED VENDING 52054 52054 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 REED VENDING REED VENDING Totals Check Number 52054 REED VENDING Check Number 52055 RICKS SURE.- VALUB 52055 08-Aug-96 RICKS SUPERVALUS Totals Check Number 52055 RICKS SUPERVALUE Check Number 52056 RITZ CAMERA Check Number 52057 ROLLINS OIL CO. Transaction Amount 110.26 55.26 386.86 46.00 46.00 128.40 52.30 180.70 33.03 33.03 Comments #173 OIL CHANGE,RADIATOR #175 OIL CHANGE. TIRE SRV SOIL PROBE CANDY FOR RESALE CANDY FOR RESALE MISC SUPPLIES 52056 08-Aug-96 RITZ CAMERA 10.33 FlUi PROCESSING 52056 08-Aug-96 RITZ CAMERA 10.95 FILM PROCESSING 52056 08-Aug-96 RITZ CAMERA 10.64 FILM DEVELOPING Totals Check Number 52056 RITZ CAMERA 31.92 52057 08-Aug-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.493.36 UNLEADED GAS Totals Check Number 52057 ROLLINS OIL CO.493.36 Check Number 52058 SENIOR COWUNITY SERVICES 52056 08-Aug-96 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,225.00 3RD QTR SENIOR ; Totals Check Number 52058 SENIOR COMMUNIIY SERVICES 3,225.00 Check Numoer 52059 SNYDER DRUG STORES 52059 06-Aug-96 SNYDEP DRUG STORES 9.95 FILM DEVELOPING 52059 08-Aug-96 SN'fDER DRUG STORES 4.78 FILM PROCESSING 52059 08-Aug-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 3.60 FILM PROCESSING 52059 08-Aug-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 6.70 AAA BATTERIES 52059 08-Aug-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 1.81 FILM PROCESSING i Au9 1996 Thu 4 :16 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 52059 52059 52059 SNYDER DRUG STORES 08-Aug-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 08-Aug-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES Totals Check Number 52059 SN\T)ER DRUG STORES Check Nuir^er 52060 SOU7HAM BUSINESS COm. USA 52060 00-Aug-96 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COW. USA Totals Check Number 52060 SOLTHAM BUSINESS COW. USA Check Number 52061 STAR TRIBUNE 52061 52061 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 52061 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 52062 SWENSON ELECTRONICS 52062 08-Aug-96 SWENSON ELECTRONICS Totals Check Number 52062 SWENSON ELECTRONIJS Check Number 52063 THE SIGN AGE 52063 52063 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 THE SIGN AGE THE SICN AGE Totals Check Number 52063 THE SIGN AGE Check Number 52064 THORPE DIST CO. 52064 08-Aug-96 THORPE DIST CO, Totals Check Number 52064 THORPE DIST CO Check Number 52065 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS 52065 06-Aug-96 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS Totals Check Number 52065 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS Check Number 52066 TOP SQUADS 52066 08-Aug-96 TOP SQUADS Totals Check Number 52066 TOP SQUADS Check Number 52067 TOWN 6 COUNTRY 52067 O0-Aug-96 TOWN 6 COUNTRY Totals Check Number 52067 TOWN & COUNTRY Transaction Amount 61.63 2.86 91.33 183.60 183.60 24.05 220.00 244.05 29.95 29.95 90.00 90.00 180.00 113.50 113.50 202.35 202.35 71.40 71.40 963.83 963.83 Page 12 Comments POLAROID FILM TILEX AD FOR L.S. 828 lENOV SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL AD FOR PH DIRECTOR SERVICE ON RECORDER VEHICLE GRAPHICS VEHICLE GRAPHICS BEER FOR RESALE FRENCH CREEK SIGN 8174 ELEC WORK AUGUST SERVICE I Aug 1996 Thu 4:16 PM Check Humber Check Number 52068 Date Name 52069 TRI STATE PUMP 08-Aug-96 TRI STATE PUMP Totals Check Number 52068 TRI STATE PUMP Qieck Number 52069 52069 TRI-K SERVICES 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number TRI-K SERVICES 52069 TRI-K SERVICES Check Number 52070 52070 TWIN CITY STRIPING Check Register City of Orono 08-4*g-96 Totals Check Number TWIN CITY STRIPING 52070 TWIN CITY STRIPING Check Number 52071 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Transaction Amount 1.296.01 1.296.01 22.72 22.72 6.080.00 6.080.00 Page 13 Comments SEALS, 0-RINGS, OTHER CLEAN CARB. REPAIR COIL STREET STRIPING 52071 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 52071 UI.IFORMS UNLIMITED Check Number 52072 US WEST COM^ICATIONS 206.31 206.31 UNIFORM PURCHASES 52072 52072 52072 52072 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number US WEST COWIUNICATIONS US WEST COWL’NICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 52072 US WEST COWUNICATIONS 277.28 29.51 67.50 683.65 1.057.94 US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES Check Number 52073 VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMENT 52073 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMENT 52073 VIKING SAFETY EQUIPMENT Check Number 52074 52074 52074 52074 52074 52074 WATERPRO 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08-Aug-96 08 Aug-96 08-Aug-96 WATERPRO WATERPRO WATERPRO WATERPRO WATERPRO Totals Check Number 52074 WATERPRO Check Nufnber 52075 52075 WIDMER INC 08-Aug-96 Totals Check Number WIDMER INC 52075 WIDMER INC 75.56 75.56 EAR PLUGS. DISP. BOOTS 1.883.41 951.05 11.91 463.09 40.48 3.349.94 22.717.83 22.717.83 REPAIR PARTS FOR HYDRANTS HYDRANT EXTENSIONS THRUST WASHER 2" METERS GASKETS. 0-RINGS KXLLY AVE PAY 81 8 Aug 1996 Thu 4 :16 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 14 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 52076 52076 52076 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 08-Aug-96 WRIGHT HENT^EPIN ELECTRIC 00-Aug-96 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 9.00 8.50 SECURITY LIGHT SECURITY LIGHT Totals Check Number 52076 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 17.50 Grand Total 156.118.04 INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING * \ CCXiNCLMEETMO AUG 12 1996 CriYOFOROMO OF •I L r * w “ • 30 - • i -V \f* »••• *'« • • 4 * %,to M • 4 *• 4 *m m m •• *• ■ - i ‘ 4 4 «. ».n.. a..4 • • • • I • • • • 8/3/96 City Of Orono Edward J, Callahan, Mayor P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Ed: coramiswon members, end the eity staff wll always be appreciated The Peterson family leaves Orono with much love and fondness for a truly wonderful community. Beat wishes to you and all the citizens of Orono. Sincerely, "^4^^ ^f?(4:£9W Steve Peterson 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Dear Council Members, August 5, 19 ‘Jo We are writing on behalf of the proposed use of land at County Rds 15 and 19 in Navarre. We would be attending the meeting of the Planning Commission and Council, but we are going to be out of town. We live at 2525 Kelly Avenue and have for 19 years. Previously, we lived at 2650 Kelly Avenue for 5 years. We are very much SUPPORTIVE of what John O’Sullivan and Erwin Smith have proposed for that lot. We’ve spoken to them at length about their plans, and feel this would be an improvement to that comer. After living in that neighborhood for 24 years, we have seen little improvement in Navarre. Please do not vote this proposal down. This may be our chance to begin to improve the blight in Navarre, and John O’Sullivan has demonstrated that he is a good businessman, interested in the improvement of the neighborhood. Sincerely, Skip and Cathy Troyak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 471-7331 c.c. Orono Planning Commission 1 WEST HENNEPIN RECYCUNG COMMISSION Greenfielrt-Independence-Long Lake-Loretto-Maple Plain-Medina-Orono 65 Stubbs Bay Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 476-001 2 6 August 1996 To: Ron Moorse For: The Mayor and City Council City of Orono Yard waste Dear Council members; Beginiung in April, phone calls from Orono residents regarding yard waste have increased significantly from past years 1, personally, have fielded over 40 calls The Orono city staff also confirms a moderate to heavy increase in resident calls regarding yardwaste, most especially brush Many callers are irritated. Residents are advised to take their brush (and leaves and grass when a city collection has expired) to various yard waste sites in Maple Grove, or contact their hauler for a special pick-up These options arc adequate and some are in the hands of private enterprise where they need to be, yet do not address a sincere interest in having locally available compost and woodchips As Orono and other West Hennepin cities continue to develop, I believe interest in ‘completing the yard waste cycle’ will grow' Orono ’s Public Works Department, among others, has worked long and hard to locate land for a permanent yard waste facility for the westerly most cities in Hennepin County. These efforts have not been successful. Perhaps an acceptable site, preferably operated by private enterprise, will never surface. However, there may be opportunities in the future. This letter was intended to: 1.) inform you that Orono residents have expressed a growing interest in more convenient yard waste disposal and end-product availability; and 2.) reactivate any thoughts or information you may have relative to possible yard waste facility sites. Very truly yours. & Amelia Kroeger Recycling Coordinator cc; John Gerhardson \ \.i Funded by WHRC with partial funding by Hennepin County*Printed on Recycled Paper with 50% Post-consumer Content . . j ' '/V 1 jv ORONQn.r August 8, 1996 ORONO PUBUC SCHOOLS D istrict Office • 685 Old Crystal Bay ROAD NORTH P.O. Box 46 • LONG Lake , Minnesota 55356-0046 t 612-449-8300 612-449-8399 Fax An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Ronald Moorse PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorse: Our area is blessed to have many civic organizations working on behalf of the community and often for young people. In an effort to improve communication between the School District and our community organizations, the Board of Education has named a liaison for each organization. Dick Lewis, a member of the Board of Education, is liaison to the City of Orono. He will touch base with you this fall. He is ready to respond to questions or issues your organization may have. His telephone number is 473-4691. It is the Board's hope that this effort will help you and your membership to get information you need quickly and accurately. And, it will help us to know about our community organizations so that we can better work together. Thanks for all you do for our community. Cordiall Martha Van de Ven Chair Board of Education cc: Dick Lewis AUG 9 19;i( J' 9: \ 1 MINUTES OF THE JOINT COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 30, 1996 Dick Flint, Park Commission Chair, indicated the Park Commission has been working on a Park Master Plan and is seeking Council direction prior to further work on the plan. Flint requested general comments from the Council regarding the Master Plan. Councilmember Hurr suggested that the language in the Master Plan calling for specific city actions should indicate the city "may" take specific actions versus "will", so that the city can maintain some flexibility in implementing the plan. There was some discussion regarding the need to submit the master plan to the Metropolitan Council if it is to be a formal amendment to the city ’s Comprehensive Plan. One of the elements of the Master Plan is the identification of current and future park land needs. It was suggested the city identify and designate specific areas to be set aside for park land prior to the remainder of the city ’s open land being subdivided. This would enable the developers to be aware of the planned park land as they are planning their subdivisions. It was indicated that parents are tending to accompany their children to parks rather than allowing them to go to parks without adult supervision. There was discussion regarding funding for parks including park land acquisition, park improvements, and park maintenance. It was suggested that the Master Plan should include a statement indicating it is the city ’s intent to develop parks that require minimal ongoing maintenance, and to use volunteer organizations, the schools, etc. to provide for the maintenance of the parks and to coordinate any recreational programs in the parks. It was suggested that a reserve fund, or something similar, be initiated to provide funds for park maintenance, park improvements, and park expansion. It was also suggested that the city continue to pursue grant funds to assist in funding park expenditures. There was discussion as to whether the city should consider the development of higher activity park areas, and if so, where they should be located. It was suggested that the city s neighborhood parks should not be made more active. It was indicated that area of Orono that is part of the Westonka School District has very little park area. The city should look for a site or sites for additional park land to serve this area. It was suggested that a tree planting or tree preservation program or requirements or incentives be added to the city ’s subdivision regulations. The purpose would be to retain or provide landscaping/screening to maintain the rural "forested" appearance. I MINUTES OF THE JOINT COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 30, 1996 page 2 of 2 Mayor Callahan suggested the two specific actions to be undertaken by the Park Commission in relation to the parks planning effort are as follows: 1.Identify land proposed to be acquired for parks/open space and determine how the land should be used. 2. Determine whether more facilities are needed in Orono for team sport activities. There was discussion regarding how the Highway 12 corridor selection process relates to the city ’s parks planning process. It was suggested the city should develop a shopping list of amenities to be included with any Highway 12 corridor i.e. bike trails, screening, open space, etc. It was also suggested the city should position itself to take advantage of opportunities to purchase from Mn/DOT excess right-of-way acquired by Mn/DOT for Highway 12. PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96PERMIT TYPEBuildingSGL FAMILY-NEWSF-ADD/REMODELSF-ACC STRUCTUREDEMO/PRINCIPALCOMMERCIAL-NEWINST-ADD/REMODEL DEMO ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE SAC ONLY Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED TEMPORARY Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION RETAINING WALLS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY3229213 0 6 46* 8 3 1 6 0 1 1 20* 17 2 0 19* 2 1 4 2 9* 0 0 0* 2 1 4 7* 101** * * * * *PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 07/01/96 - 07/31/96BASE FEE4,7314,9981,1111004,9481,811 0 886 7B5000005075 00 00 18,587.50* 457 182 62 214 0 35 35 91 50 01 58 00 00 CO 987.00* 1,051.31 278.00 0.00 1,329.31* VALUATION713,852378,97263,7880985,000 201,500 0 50,536 0000on000000 00 00 2,393,648.00* 31,629.96 12,779.00 4.960.43 9.966.44 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 ■^1,330^^3* 6/, 65,783.00 0.00 0.00 65,783.00* 70.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 950.00 0.00 455.00*0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*0.00* 125.00 0.00 153.00 14,000.00 140.00 0.00 418.00* 14,000.00* 776.81**D34t^^ .0-3* PLAN REVIEW3,0752,39259703,21640 0 486 9,809 638369005346 00 69 83* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 9,809.83** JULY 1996* * * * *QTY PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 07/01/95 - 07/31/95BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW49,516.50 1,631,000.00 6,185.72172,824.00 185,896.00 1,121.734686.50 42,500.00 446.232190.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 2 80.00 0.00 0.00 3 383.00 23,000.00 235.30 32*13,680.00*1,882,396.00*7,988.98* 6 481.13 37,690.00 0.00 5 305.00 20,850.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 280.00 8,600.00 0.00 1 35.00 500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20*1,101.13*67,640.00*0.00* 13 1,011.25 65, .40.16 0.00 1 35.00 1,200.00 0.00 1 35.00 300.00 0.00 15*1,081.25*66,940.16*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1 850.00 0.00 0.00 11*1, P'-.n . 00*0.00*0.00* 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 2*65.00*0.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1*35.00*0.00*0.00* 81**17,812.38**2,016,976.16** 7,908.98** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96 PERMIT FEE CITY OFFROM 07/01/96BUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGBASE FEE 18,587.50 987.00 1,329.31 PLAN REVIEW 9,809.83 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 1,198.07 31.17 34.69 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 21,600.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 99.75 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN 1.50 x7.99 8.99 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 51,296.65 1,036.16 1,372.99 * ft t * • REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 22,776.81 PLAN REVIEW 9,809.83 SURCHARGE 1,276.43 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 21,600.00 INVESTIGATION 134.75 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 28.48 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 55,626.30 1,455.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,458.50 * * * * *PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 07/01/96 TO 07/31/96 * * * * * JULY 1996 USER418.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 462.00 PAGE: 35REQUESTER: CAROLESIGNFIRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ^ PAGE: 36 REQUESTER: CAROLE i WED, JUL 31, ^996, 4:04 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK PDDR NBR STREET PAGE 1JULY 1996ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONVOGT400.000. 00172.000. 00HOLMES141,852.00STEINMETZ7,000.00JEWETT9,000.00BOWMAN35,000.00 HELGREN 45,000.00 GEHL 87,840.00 ANDERSON 30,000.00 DAYTON 5,000.00 OUADY 10,248.00 PERRY 8,388.00 AFFELDT 14,000.00 ROTH 5,400.00 WROBLEWSKI 4,800.00 OBERHAUSER 8,000.00 BARNES 14,800.00 QUAM 1,000.00 BUTLER 36,256.00 FACKLER 1,500.00 KAATZ 3,975.00 ANDERSSON 700.00 MONAHAN 1,421.00 SIGAFOOS 3,995.00 MCPHERSON 6,000.00 NELSON 119,500.00 9,388.00 CARLSON 10,985.00 JACKSON 11,000.00 DODSON 800.00 EDMUNDS .00 HOLMES .00 O'SULLIVAN 985,000.00 MELBY 2,000.00 80,000.00 5,000.00 PEREZ 8,000.00 PETERSON 1,500.00 MCDOWELL 35,000.00 7,500.00 JOHNSTON 27,000.00 JOHNSON 7,000.00 CUMMINGS 10,300.00 PERKINS 15,000.00 CARLSON 4,000.00 BENNETT 1,500.00 NADEAU 4,960.43 HOFFMAN 1,100.00 MARKS 7,103.00 1,000.00 jnto.oo JEWETT 3,166.44 46C ME 010101020202 02 02 02 04 04 04 04 04 05 06 09 09 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 19 20 20 24 24 29 29 29 29 30 30 30 31 33 46C 01 01 01 01 01 01 292027551390115535463458 865 1825 1490 2465 1223 440 4765 1251 630 121 2965 3760 3145 3700 2560 135 3240 2900 2145 685 500 550 1145 2117 1030 1390 3340 2180 685 240 3465 1930 2643 240 2705 4575 3525 55 780 405 2055 40 40 2425 3535 3546 SOMERSET LA COPPER VIEW DR PARK DR BROWN RD S IVY PLNORTH SHORE DR WINDJAMMER LA CONCORDIA ST LONG LAKE BLVD FRENCH LAKE RD BROWN RD S WILLOW DR S TONKAVIEW LA BRIAR ST PARK LA CHEVY CHASE DR DEER RUN TR NORTHERN AVB CASCO CIR TOGO RD DUNWOODY AVE CYGNET PL 6TH AVE N CASCO POINT RD 6TH AVE N OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N TONKAWA RD TONKAWA RD WYNDMERE RD SHADYWOOD RD TONKAWA RD PARK DR SHORELINE DR NORTH SHORE DR OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N CRESTVIEW AVE EASTLAKE ST WEST FARM RD THOROUGHBRED LA NORTHGATE RD PHEASANT RD WOLVERTON PL IVY PL LANDMARK DR NORTH ARM DR TONKAWA RD WEBBER HILLS RD WEAR LA N WEAR LA N OLD BEACH RD IVY PL IVY PL 96/07/10 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/25 or 96/07/01 OR 96/07/08 OR 96/07/10 OR /07/10 OR 96/07/26 OR 96/07/30 OR 96/07/02 OR 96/07/02 OR 96/07/19 OR 96/07/22 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/03 OR 96/07/22 OR 96/07/31 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/11 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/19 OR 96/07/22 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/25 OR 96/07/25 OR 96/07/25 OR 96/07/29 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/23 OR 96/07/02 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/26 OR 96/07/15 OR 96/07/31 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/17 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/03 OR 96/07/11 OR 96/07/23 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/17 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/18 OR 008082008150008195008111008130008133 008140 008186 008214 007813 008123 008169 008182 008187 008115 008129 008164 008216 008146 008192 008109 008144 008162 008178 008180 008194 008198 008199 008200 008206 008168 008184 008119 008165 000201 008152 000189 008114 000121 000158 008159 008113 008117 008120 000122 008156 008110 008139 000160 008166 008170 000172 147667681507555515409404000000001471053214742740 00000000 19340854 00000000 00000000 19389350 00000000 00000000 00000000 14768403 00000000 18941480 00000000 13915514 00000000 14726539 00000000 00000000 14726539 14733397 12534441 17227129 17227129 17227129 00000000 19421060 14842726 17632998 19344710 17800528 00000000 14725170 00000000 00000000 14752097 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 16393931 14750548 39415060 36332561 34347747 36332561 24701208 35712525 STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ RICHARD LARSON BLDRS, INC FLAG BUILDERS INCDANBERRY COMPANYTERRY STODOLA CONSTRUCTION HANSEN HOMETECH INC DURABILT ASSOCIATES, INC LUCAS DESIGN WORKS VALLEY POOLS INC MINNESOTA EXTERIORS SMITH WF ROOFING SMITH WF ROOFING PLYMOUTH ROOFING GRANITE CITY ROoFING INC GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO KEITH WATERS & ASSOC PRECISION LANDSCAPE & TREE C I CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS, INC M fit S ROOFING JMN BUILDERS INC BOYER fit SONS INC CRANDALL EUGENE JENSEN HOMES WORLD WIDE CHIMNEY FIRESIDE CORNER AIR MECHANICAL, INC. FIRESIDE CORNER STEINKRAUS PLBG INC AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO WED, JUL 31, 1996, 4:04 VMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET JULY 1996ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONME 20C PL 19C SW UD 0101010101010202 19 24 24 24 24 29 20C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 24 24 24 24 24 29 19C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 29 9C 01 01 01 22 29 29 26754302425249026002490137560 645 420 1810 3460 040 2643 1396 40 3500 2425 565 3535 2600 2490 3010 2505 3458 1375 3505 1645 3546 2295 1530 2705 2466 265 325 2405 070 250 2575 2600 2490 2466 4105 3500 3560 315 250 315 FOX ST BROWN RD S OLD BEACH RD CASCO POINT RD THOROUGHBRED LA CASCO POINT RD REST PT RD ORONO ORCHARD RD S TONKAWA RD BROWN RD S SHADYWOOD RD NORTH SHORE DR OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S THOROUGHBRED LA BALDUR PARK RD WEAR LA N BAYSIDE RD OLD BEACH RD LEAF ST IVY PL THOROUGHBRED LA CASCO POINT RD SOMERSET LA OLD BEACH RD NORTH SHORE DR REST PT RD 6TH AVE N BOHNS PT RD IVY PL LONGVIEW CIR TANGLEWOOD RD PHEASANT RD DUNWOODY AVE CRESTVIEW AVE CRESTVIEW AVE THOROUGHBRED LA OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S CYGNET PL THOROUGHBRED LA THOROUGHBRED LA CASCO POINT RD DUNWOODY AVE BAYSIDE RD BAYSIDE RD BAYSIDE RD TONKAWA RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY KD S TONKAWA RD 96/07/19 OR 96/07/23 OR 96/07/29 OR 96/07/29 OR 96/07/29 OR 96/07/30 OR 96/07/01 OR 96/07/02 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/09 OR 96/CV/09 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/15 OR 96/07/09 OR 96/07/09 OR 96/07/11 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/17 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/25 OR 96/07/26 OR 96/07/30 OR 96/07/19 OR 96/07/22 OR 96/07/30 OR 96/07/12 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/18 OR 96/07/19 OR 96/07/30 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/03 OR 96/07/03 OR 96/07/17 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/22 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/31 OR 96/07/29 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/10 OR 96/07/11 OR 96/07/24 OR 96/07/23 OR 96/07/16 OR 96/07/16 OR 000176008185000207000208008209008210008110008124 008196 008135 008136 008140 000149 008151 000131 008134 000142 008145 000161 008171 008190 000197 008202 000212 008179 008183 000213 008147 000173 000175 008177 008211 000138 000127 008128 000155 008163 008101 008180 008203 008205 008137 008141 000143 008191 008157 008153 000154 2533663339414211389479393633256136332561346060223633256134791600 37006332 30711491 39203800 34791600 34791600 34203677 29221235 27700368 25606171 26818252 25456150 24701200 24724456 24630220 28944040 14315791 29411871 27839080 24721977 24490147 24490147 25334357 24733680 24738793 24724959 24461495 24461495 57237155 56572540 00000000 57237155 54287393 OCOOOOOO 24724959 84721306 04721306 00000000 14750548 84461778 04450649 PLUMBING SYSTEMS, INC. KLEVE HTG k AC ANDERSON AIR INC FIRESIDE CORNER FIRESIDE CORNER CONTROLLED AIR FIRESIDE CORNER COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C GRIFFIN SVC STA EQUIP A-ABC APPLIANCE k HEATING CRONSTROMS HTG At AC INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C HEATING k COOLING TWO KENWOOD PLBG E k Z TESTING k REPAIR CENTRAL PLUMBING HESSIAN PLMB SERVICES INC WELD, DON PLUMBING STEINKRAUS PLBG INC DONAHUE PLBG k HTG STATE MECHANICAL INC HAFERMAN WATER CONDITIONIN JOHN THOMAS CUSTOM HOMES JOHNSON DAN PLUMBING PLUMBING SERVICES INC MADSEN PLBG k HTG CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. aiSTOM PLUMBING, INC. PLYMOUTH PLUMBING SCHMIT STEVE PLBG CITYVIEW PLBG Ac HTG WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WIDMER INC WIDMER INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC MARTY EXCAVATING CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC PATNODE BROTHERS WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS JENSEN HOMES TEMACA ABLE SPRINKLER SLOCUMBREHMGERLICHERWHITELEY RASMUSSEN ALBRECHT NELSON ELLIS WETT BANGERT BRUCE MARKS CLOUTIER CARSON BOWMAN GERLICHER MEINHARDT HALLORAN JEWETT HARDIN CECIN JOHNSTON MORGAN SULLIVAN EIDEN LUTZ EIDEN 1,596.967.400.004.800.001.100.00 1,100.005.830.002.500.001.900.00 1,000.00 1.879.00 9.000. 00 3.100.00 1.800.00 1.000. 00 12,405.00 7.000. 00 150.00 8.000. 00 250.00 5.000. 00 9,500.00 6.000. 00 2,778 00 00 00 00 1,500 600 2,000.00 500.00 500 500 8,200 900 00 00 00 00 00 BURKE BANGERT BALGAARD BENNETT THOMPSON BENNETT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 WED. JUL 31. .j96, 4:04 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET JULY 1996ISSUED PERMIT NHR ID NUMBER COMPANY96/07/25 OR-008193 14482472 ESSIGS TREE k LANDSCAPES OWNER LAST NM HOLLAND PAGE 3VALUATION14.000.00 .a, 034.700UD7ClOlC327C4119OAK ST 01 Residence 24 02 Addition 25 03 Garage/Attached 26 04 Garage/Detached 27 05 Porch 28 06 Deck 29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 32 10 Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 34 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 • Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined LCX!AL DSB CODES 00^9 Undefined Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal WED, JUL 31, j96, 4:01 PMNUMERICAL LISTING JULY 1996PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONDAYTON5,000.00 400,000.00KAATZ3,975.00NADEAU4.960.43STEINMETZ7,000.00JOHNSON7,000.00PETERSON1,500.00 WROBLEWSKI 4,800.00 CUMMINGS 10,300.00 GERLICHER 2,500.00 O'SULLIVAN 985,000.00 PERKINS 15.000. 00 35.000. 00 CARLSON 4,000.00 QUADY 10,248.00 WHITELEY 1,900.00 MORGAN .00 SULLIVAN .00 OBERHAUSER 8,000.00 JEWETT 9,000.00 WETT 12,405.00 BOWMAN 35,000.00 7,000.00 RASMUSSEN 1,879.00 ALBRECHT 9,000.00 .00 .00 HOFFMAN 1,100.00 HELGREN 45,000.00 BURKE .00 BANGERT 150.00 BANGERT .00 ANDERSSON 700.00 8,000.00 BUTLER 36,2bt.00 HALLORAN 5u0.00 NELSON 3,100.00 ELLIS 1,800.00 VOGT 172,000.00 1,000.00 MELBY 5,000.00 THOMPSON .00 DENNETT .00 EIDEN .00 BENNETT 1,500.00 BENNETT .00 MCDOWELL 7,500.00 JOHNSTON 27,000.00 7,103.00 BRUCE 250.00 MONAHAN 1,421.00 .00 BARNES 14,800.00 2,000.00 OR-007813OR-000082OR-008109OR-008110OR-008111OR-008113OR-008114 OR-008115 OR-008117 OR-008118 OR-008119 OR-008120 OR-008121 OR-008122 OR-008123 OR-008124 OR-008127 OR-008128 OR-008129 OR-008130 OR-008131 OR-008133 OR-008134 OR-008135 OR-008136 OR-008137 OR-008138 OR-008139 OR-008140 OR-008141 OR-008142 OR-008143 OR-008144 OR-008145 OR-008146 OR-008147 OR-008148 OR-008149 OR-008150 OR-008151 OR-008152 OR-008153 OR-008154 OR-008155 OR-008156 OR-008157 OR-008158 OR-008159 OR-008160 OR-008161 OR-008162 OR-008163 OR-008164 OR-008165 96/07/02 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/01 N 96/07/02 N 96/07/03 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/11 N 96/07/02 N 96/07/02 N 96/07/03 N 96/07/03 N 96/07/03 N 96/07/08 N 96/07/09 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/09 N 96/07/09 N 96/07/09 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/11 N 96/07/11 N 96/07/11 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/12 N 96/07/15 N 96/07/15 N 96/07/16 N 96/07/16 N 96/07/17 N 96/07/23 N 96/07/23 N 96/07/18 N 96/07/17 N 96/07/17 N 96/07/17 N 96/07/18 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/22 N 96/07/10 N 2465 2920 2560 2055 1155 4575 1930 630 3525 1375 3340 55 2643 700 1223 60 265 325 121 3546 1396 3458 40 420 1810 2466 2466 40 365 4105 3500 3500 135 2425 3145 1645 3460 840 2755 2643 240 250 315 2405 405 315 240 2705 40 565 3240 070 2965 2100 FRENCH LAKE RD 04 SOMERSET LA 01 DUNWOODY AVE 11 WEBBER HILLS RD 01 BROWN RD S 02 WOLVERTON PL 30 WESi FARM RD 29 PARK LA 05 IVY PL 30 REST PT RD 02 SHORELINE DR 19 LANDMARK DR 30 THOROUGHBRED LA 29 NORTH ARM DR 31 BROWN RD S 04 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 02 CRESTVIEW AVE 01 CRESTVIEW AVE 01 CHEVY CHASE DR 06 IVY PL 02 BALDUR PARK RD 01 NORTH SHORE DR 02 WEAR LA N 01 BROWN RD S 24 SHADYWOOD RD 24 DUNWOODY AVE 29 DUNWOODY AVE 2 9 WEAR LA N 01 WINDJAMMER LA 02 BAYSIDE RD 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 CYGNET PL 11 OLD BEACH RD 01 CASCO CIR 10 BOHNS PT RD 24 NORTH SHORE DR 24 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 24 COPPER VIEW DR 01 THOROUGHBRED LA 29 CRESTVIEW AVE 24 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 29 TONKAWA RD 29 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 TONKAWA RD 33 TONKAWA RD 22 NORTHGATE RD 29 PHEASANT RD 29 WEAR LA N 01 LEAF ST 01 6TH AVE N 11 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 01 DEER RUN TR 09 NORTH SHORE DR 20 00000000147667681472653939415060000000000000000000000000 14760403 00000000 36332561 17632998 00000000 00000000 16393931 19389350 34^’91600 24461495 24461495 00000000 14710532 29221235 14742748 27708360 30711491 39203800 24724959 24724959 36332561 00000000 04721306 25606171 84721306 00000000 26810252 13915514 24490147 34791600 34791600 15875555 34283677 00000000 84461770 84450649 57237155 14750548 14750540 14752097 00000000 34347747 25456150 00000000 56572548 18941400 19344710 STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ SMITH WF ROOFING WORLD WIDE CHIMNEY LUCAS DESIGN WORKS FIRESIDE CORNER C I CONSTRUCTION CRANDALL EUGENE DURABILT ASSOCIATES, INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C WIDMER INC WIDMER INC DANBERRY COMPANY KENWOOD PLBG TERRY STODOLA CONSTRUCTION E & Z TESTING k REPAIR A-ABC APPLIANCE k HEATING CRONSTROMS HTG fit AC INC WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS FIRESIDE CORNER ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS CENTRAL PLUMBING ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS HESSIAN PLMB SERVICES INC MINNESOTA EXTERIORS CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C RICHARD LARSON BLDRS, INC HEATING fit COOLING TWO TEMACA ABLE SPRINKLER CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC JENSEN HOMES JENSEN HOMES BOYER fit SONS INC AIR MECHANICAL, INC. WELD, DON PLUMBING MARTY EXCAVATING VALLEY POOLS INC CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS, INC WED, JUL. 31, 1996, 4:01 PMNUMERICAL LISTING JULY 1996PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 2WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONEDMUNDS1,000.00.00PERRY8,388.00MARKS.JCX5 .00MARKS5,000.00JEWETT3,166.44JEWETT500.00HARDIN500.00SLOCUM1,596.96CECIN8,200.00SIGAFOOS3,995.00BOWMAN1,500.00MCPHERSON 6,000.00 LUTZ .00 AFFELDT 14,000.00 GERLICHER 600.00 HOLMES .00 BREHM 7,400.00 GEHL 87,840.00 ROTH 5,400.00 El DEN .00 PEREZ 8,000.00 BALGAARD 9,500.00 .00 FACKLER 1,500.00 ROLLAND 14,000.00 HOLMES 119.500.00 141.852.00 CLOUTIER 1,000.00 6,000.00 NELSON 9,388.00 CARLSON 10,985.00 JACKSON 11,000.00 CARSON 80,000.00 2,778.00 DODSON .00 .00 800.00 JOHNSTON 4.800.00 1.100.00 1,100.00 5,830.00 900.00 MEINHARDT .00 2,000.00 ANDERSON 30,000.00 QUAM 1,000.00 OR-008166OR-008168OR-008169OR-008170OR-008171OR-008172OR-008173OR-008175OR-008176OR-008177OR-008178OR-008179OR-008180OR-008181 OR-008182 OR-008183 OR-008184 OR-008185 OR-008186 OR-008187 OR-008188 OR-008189 OR-008190 OR-008191 OR-008192 OR-008193 OR-008194 OR-008195 OR-008196 OR-008197 OR-008198 OR-008199 OR-008200 OR-008201 OR-008202 OR-008203 OR-008205 OR-008206 OR-008207 OR-008208 OR-008209 OR-008210 OR-008211 OR-008212 OR-008213 OR-008214 OR-008216 lOlC 96/07/18 N 96/07/18 N 96/07/19 N 96/07/lfl N 96/07/18 N 96/07/10 N 96/07/18 N 96/07/18 N 96/07/19 N 96/07/19 N 96/07/19 N 96/07/19 N 96/07/22 N 96/07/22 N 96/07/22 N 96/07/22 N 96/07/23 N 96/07/23 N 96/07/26 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/31 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/24 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/25 N 96/07/26 N 96/07/26 N 96/07/31 N 96/07/29 N 96/07/29 N 96/07/29 N 96/07/29 N 96/07/29 N 96/07/30 N 96/07/30 N 96/07/30 N 96/07/30 N 96/07/30 N 96/07/31 N 242510304403535353535463546229526751530290034582145258 4765 1375 1390 430 1825 1251 2575 3465 2600 3560 3700 4119 685 1390 645 2490 500 550 1145 605 3010 2600 2490 2117 2425 2490 2600 2490 2705 2505 3585 1490 3760 OLD BEACH RD 01 TONKAWA RD 16 WILLOW DR S 04 IVY PL 01 IVY PL 01 IVY PL 01 IVY PL 24 LONGVIEW CIR 24 FOX ST 01 TANGLEWOOD RD 24 CASCO POINT RD 11 NORTH SHORE DR 02 6TH AVE N 11 CYGNET PL 01 TONKAVIEW LA 04 REST PT RD 02 PARK DR 16 BROWN RD S 01 CONCORDIA ST 02 BRIAR ST 04 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 EASTLAKE ST 24 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 TOGO RD 10 OAK ST 32 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 11 PARK DR 01 TONKAWA RD 19 CASCO POINT RD 01 TONKAWA RD 11 TONKAWA RD 11 WYNDMERE RD 11 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 20 SOMERSET LA 01 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 CASCO POINT RD 01 SHADYWOOD RD 11 OLD BEACH RD 01 CASCO POINT RD 01 THOROUGHBRED LA 01 CASCO POINT RD 01 PHEASANT RD 24 OLD BEACH RD 01 6TH AVE N 02 LONG LAKE BLVD 02 NORTHERN AVE 09 3633256119421060000000002470120024701200357125252449014725334357253366332473360014726539294118711473339700000000 00000000 27839080 14042726 39414211 19340854 00000000 57237155 14725170 24724456 00000000 00000000 14402472 12534441 15409404 37806332 24638220 17227129 17227129 17227129 1780P52B 28944040 54287393 00000000 00000000 38947939 36332561 36332561 34606022 24738793 14315791 24721977 00000000 00000000 FIRESIDE CORNER KEITH WATERS & ASSOCSTEINKRAUS PLBG INC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. PLYMOUTH PLUMBING PLUMBING SYSTEMS, INC. SCHMIT STEVE PLBG SMITH WF ROOFING JOHNSON DAN PLUMBiNG PLYMOUTH ROOFING PLUMBING SERVICES INC PRECISION LANDSCAPE k TREE KLEVE HTG k AC HANSEN HOMETECH INC CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC JMN BUILDERS INC DONAHUE PLBG fit HTG ESSIGS TREE fit LANDSCAPES GRANITE CITY ROOFING INC FLAG BUILDERS INC GRIFFIN SVC STA EQUIP STATE MECHANICAL INC GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO M U S ROOFING HAFERMAN WATER CONDITIONIN PATNODE BROTHERS ANDERSON AIR INC FIRESIDE CORNER FIRESIDE CORNER CONTROLLED AIR CITYVIEW PLBG fit HTG JOHN THOMAS CUSTOM HOMES MADSEN PLBG fit HTG ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTLuREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/31/96 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 07/31/96 • PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 07/01/96 - 07/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 07/01/95 - 07/31/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWUser DefinedSUBDIVISION 3 700.00 0.00 0.00 1 1,340.00 0.00 0.00VARIANCE92,110.00 0.00 0.00 7 1,300.00 0.00 0.00CUP00.00 0.00 0.00 4 950.00 0.00 0.00SKETCH PLAN 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 3 600.00 0.00 0.00/ARIANCE/CUP 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 1,200.00 0.00 0.00REZONING1350.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 14*3,410.00*0.00*0.00*18*5,390.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 14**3,410.00**0.00**0.00**18**5,390.00**0.00**0.00** USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 3,410.00 3,410.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 oo%oSAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 3,410.00 3,410.00 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT ♦*»•* CITY OF ORONO FROM 07/01/96 TO 07/31/96 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLB PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED year-to-dateREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96PERMIT TYPEBuilding SGL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/RBMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/REMODEL DEMO INST-ADD/REMODEL SF-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer U Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTB DRNFLD 6/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER k WATER Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIREWORKS QTY1916321514 1 3 0 0 0 15 232* ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO n * • • *PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 07/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 07/31/95BASE FEE37,39137,5482,6143904,9481,551 80 1,811 0 0 0 1,995 88,332 .50.75.75.00.50.75 .00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .25 .25* VALUATION6.022.573.003.087.311.00155.403.00 0.00985,000.00162.026.00 0.00 201.500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.292.00 10,726,105.00* PLAN REVIEW24,30418,5041,51203,2163340 40 0 0 0 1,110 49,024 .43 .72 .90 .00 .53 .43 .00 .46 . 00 .00 .00 .53 .00* QTY20131199071 1 1 1 5 7 202* BASE FEE34,13631,8213,36957002,42030 56 72 0 170 1,194 73,840 .35.25.00.00.00.50.00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .50 .35* VALUATION6.461.278.003.660.706.00379.400.00 0.00 0.00382.542.00 0.00 1,800.00 5,000.00 550,000.00 0.00 75,225.00 11,515,951.00* PLAN REVIEW22,18717,2132,135001110 36 46 1,423 0 762 43,916 .28.35.25.00.00.15.00 .89 .80 .18 .00 .78 .68* 65 16 2 40 5 2 9 7 0 146* 6,031.41 772.40 97.01 1,670.83 175.00 70.00 357.94 262.50 0.00 9,437.09* 466,975.78 53,051.00 6,060.43 96,416.44 5.375.00 1,000.00 15,^25.00 9.050.00 0.00 tS3.003.69* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 37 9 0 31 2 3 8 5 1 96* 3,040.45 525.00 0.00 1,403.75 105.63 105.00 280.00 175.00 247.50 5,802.33* 230,291.00 34.850.00 0.90 76.924.00 6.850.00 1.100.00 7.065.00 5.450.00 19.800.00 382,330.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 353. 93 5 2 100* 6,496.18 751.00 70.00 7,317.18* 415,017.00 250.00 800.00 416,067.88* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 70 3 2 75* 5,402.78 349.00 70.00 5,821.78* 371,051.95 1,200.00 700.00 373,751.95* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 7 1 20 1 7 1 2 39* 245.00 35.00 2,000.00 50.00 4,600.00 35.00 140.00 7,105.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 0 23 2 1 0 1 29* 70.00 0.00 2.300.00 100.00 850.00 0.00 70.00 3,390.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 o 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 1 2 3* 0.00 29.25 60.00 09.25* 1 0.00 800.00 0.00 800.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 1 2 5* 70.00 35.00 60.00 165.00* 1,500.00 400.00 0.00 1,900.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 PLx^lTS TSSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE.REPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN BPKMTISS-1 07/31/96 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 2REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 07/31/96 •- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 07/31/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN RrviBNSub-total 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*3*150.00*0.00*0.00*User DefinedLAND ALTERATION 11 650.00 0.00 0.00 11 580.00 3,000.00 0.00TREE REMOVAL 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 RETAINING WALLS 3 306.00 23,290.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 DOCKS 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 LAWN SPRINKLER 8 280.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 28*1,416.00*23,290.00*0.00*20*940.00*3,000.00*0.00* Grand-total 548**113,696.77**11,820,116.53**49,024.00**430**90,189.46**12,276,932.95**43,916.68* <• V * PEPMITSfr» rr* ^tr>n t*. i-i r\rr> ^ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 07/31/96 CITY OF FROM 01/01/96 REPORT *•*•• ORONOTO 07/31/96 REQUESTER: CAROLEBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER fit WATER USER SIGN FIREBASE PEE 00,332.25 9,437.09 7,317.18 7,105.00 1,416.00 89.25 0.00PLAN REVIEW 49,024.00 O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SURCHARGE5,369.23 330.20 219.67 16.00 13.13 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 24,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 023.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN FEE MQIL IN 1.50 1,355.00 104.37 3.00 54.78 1.50 1.50 50.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 169,155.23 9,874.66 7,593.13 7,172.50 1,464.13 89.25 0.00 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/96 TO 07/31/96 PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE BASE FEB PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN FEB MQIL IN ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 113,696.77 49.024.00 5,948.23 0.00 24.250.00 850.25 0.00 162.15 1,355.00 50.00 1.50 3.00 0.00 195,340.90 ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES CQLI£CrED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONODJVMr^C_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _T rMlC*REQUESTEr.:PAGE: 1CAROLE01/01/96 -07731/96 01/01/95 -------------07/31/95PERMIT TYPE OTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWUser DefinedSUBDIVISION 9 5,845.00 0.00 0.00 9 4,715.00 O.OG 0.00VARIANCE388,760.00 0.00 O.CO 33 6,900.00 0.00 0.00CUP82,200.00 0.00 0.00 13 2,825.00 0.00 0.00SKETCH PLAN 3 750.00 0.00 0.00 7 1,400.00 0.00 0.00VARIANCE/CUP 1 75.00 0.00 0.00 5 1,875.00 0.00 0.00VACATION3600.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00REZONING1350.90 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00APPEAL00.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 63*18,580.00*0.00*0.00*68*17,815.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 63**18,580.00**0.00*• 0.00**68**17,815.00**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/31/96 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT •* CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/96 TO 07/31/96 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER; CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 18,580.00 18,580.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 o3ooSAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 18,580.00 18,580.00 r 1996 RECAP OF COUTRACT CITIESJanuary February March Apri I June July August Septeater October Moveaber Pecewber tTD fotalaSpring Park Plan Review Inspect ior» RetainerTOTALNo. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 82.8739U.0025.00497.87026 438.59 120.0025.00583.59 1 8 200.36 195.0025.00420.36 213 0.00285.00 25.00310.00 019 576.71 135.0025.00736.71 1 9 105.30 150.0025.00280.30 210 3.243.33 195.0025.003.463.33 613 4.647.16 1,345.00175.006.292.16 12 98Minnetonka Beach Plan Review Inspections Retainer TOTALNo. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 0.00135.00 25.00160.00 0 9 772.3730.0025.00827.37 2 2 511.5530.0025.00566.55 2 2 744.5775.0025.00844.57 3 5 308.43 135.0025.00468.43 2 9 1.480.04 60.00 25.001.565.04 4 4 146.09 210.0025.00381.09 114 3.963.05675.00175.004.813.05 14 45657.87 “l™10.96 1.205.U 1,84^.31 !t,8U.4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 15, 1996 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date wth the followng members present Chair Stephen Peterson, Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, and William Stoddard Elizabeth Hawn was absent The following represented the City Staff Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, and Recorder Sherry Frost Council Members Kelley and Goetten were present Chair Peterson called the meeting to order at 7 03 p m SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC INFORMATION REVIEWS (#1) 7:00 P.M. - «I52 HANS T. HAGEN, 4750 WEST BR,\NCH ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Application has been withdrawn by applicant. ACTION ITEMS («) #2131 LARRY KARKELA, 4149 UIGHWOOD ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7.03-7:18 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application was for an after-the-fact variance in the construction of a 65 5 s.f upper level deck at the lakeshore side of the property. The deck extends from expanding a 3' walking deck. The proposed structure is 21' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The existing lower level deck is 31.6'. This additional deck results in 11.5 s.f of additional hardcover. The applicant offered his apology for the after-the-fact construction. Peterson informed the applicant that the issue of average lakeshore setback was important. He noted letters received from neighbors on both sides in support of the project. Lindquist commented on the question of whether the deck w ould have been approved if a variance request was proposed prior to the construction. It was noted that the deck was stopped during construction and has stood incomplete since 1993. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (</2 - #2131 L?rry Karkela - Continued) Smith asked if there were any extenuating circumstances which resulted in this deck being constructed. Karkela said the existing lower level deck is accessed from a spiral staircase, which is cumbersome to travel down, and therefore, it is only used w hen he has a large number of guests The other option is to walk down a steep hill, which is also difficult when carrying food, etc. The upper level had a walkway-type deck and was being expanded to allow its dining use Peterson asked about the 1984 permits when the walkway was approved but a deck was not pan of the application Mabusth noted the inability of the 3' walkw ay deck to house a table with chairs Mabusth added that the applicant is willing to remove portions of the lower level deck and/or parking area to offset hardcover increase There were no public comments. Smith asked the applicant what he w as w illing to remove of the low er level deck in order to gain the upper level deck Karkela said he was open to what was necessary to keep the upper level deck but noted the complexity of remov ing sections of lower level deck because of location of footings and need to maintain stability of the upper deck Karkela added that the upper level deck was at the height of the roof lines of the neighboring homes The neighbors view to the west was said to be downward toward the lakeside. Trees separated his property from his other neighbor at the east. Stoddard asked if there were any guidelines for mitigation Mabusth said that determination was made by the Commission and applicant adding that the applicant was aware of the structural excesses The applicant suggested removing corner pieces from the lower deck. He was willing to remove more hardcover Smith did not wish to take away from the driveway. Lindquist suggested removing the length of the deck to maintain the same edging on both decks Lhe applicant said he would prefer to cut the corners off from a style standpoint. Karkela suggested removing 6' triangles of lower deck of 36 s f, which w ould result in a reduction of 11 s f with the new deck. Smith noted that the hardcover excess was already in existence prior to the new deck. The applicant then suggested to remove the front 2-3' of deck to the footing area along with the triangular pieces from the two front corners This would enable the applicant to maintain the current footings Stoddard moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2131 based on the design as outlined above of removing decking to the supports and comers Schroeder inquired why the applicant waited from 1993 to 1996 to finish the project. Karkela said he had personal matters which had required his attention Vote Ayes 5, Nays 1, Peterson, who historically votes against allowing any average lakeshore setback variances. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#3) #2135 PAUL AND SUE HEDLUND/EDNA ALBEE ESTATE, 1575 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:18-7:54 P.M. Members of the Edna Albee family were present, along with Burnet Realtor, Jeff Martineau. Gaffron recalled the application being before the Commission at their May meeting for a proposed addition to the structure to include removal of a detached garage, a new attached garage, an addition, a second story addition, and driveway There are concerns over hardcover excess, the placement of the garage to the street and side of the property, and the septic/sewer situation Gaffron said the proposed buyers of the property, the Hedlunds, are currently not pursuing the application, but the property owners would like to continue with the application in order to determine what can be done with the property. Gaflron continued in reporting on the hardcover, which will decrease from the existing 1195 s.f to 1185 s f, rather than the originally proposed increase to 1280 s.f Hardcover in the 75-250' zone will increase from 887 s f to 1467 s f, rather than to 1783 s.f as originally proposed The net hardcover results in an increase from 2082 s f to 2652 s.f rather than to 3063 s.f as originally proposed This would be equivalent to the 25% allowed in the 75-250’ setback The garage, now proposed at 34' from the side lot line, will now meet the required 30’ side setback This revised proposal moves the garage to a location 8' from the street property line and out of the public right-of-way, rather than 1' from the line as originally proposed. Gaffron said the applicants ask to rehab the house to no more than 2 bedrooms. The existing septic tanks will be disconnected from the drainfield and a fully executed pumping contract from a licensed contractor will be supplied to the City. The owner will also draft and record a restrictive covenant on the chain of title for the property stating a 3rd bedroom would not be allowed until City sewer has been obtained and installed. The closet in the main floor den must be walled off, which will incur the need for a building permit if it is rebuilt to create a third bedroom Gaffron noted that the existing septic tank may only need a plug for the outlet, which would result in a minimal cost. If no sealed tank is found when inspected, however, a new tank would be required, and might cost the applicant about $2000. Gaffron reviewed other issues of concern. The second story addition would be located 49' from the lake, where 100’ is required A variance for an 8’ street setback would be necessary, where 50' is required in the 2-acre zoning district. There would be an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 32’ It was noted that even though almost all of the house is within the lakeshore setback, it would not encroach on the views enjoyed by the adjacent neighboring properties. The hardcover will stay within the guideline for the overall hardcover There is a bluff issue on the west side Some filling would result from the project and erosion control measures will be necessary' during construction. MINUTES OF THE ORONO Pl.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#3 - #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund^dna Albee Estate - Continued) Peterson responded to the report noting the positK-e changes that were made He reported that the number of lakeshore variances requested w ith this application is similar to that of other properties in the areas of Long Lake Boulev ard and Casco Point, which do not meet zoning regulations Peterson said the City does not know when sewer will come to the area, and he has no problem with a holding tank Peterson also reported that he spoke with a neighboring property owner to the east, Mr Bingham, who originally voiced concern over the location of the garage near the side lot line but is in favor of the revision Peterson noted that the street setback is consistent with that of the neighborhood The bluff issue was said to be initiated by the state and does not seem to present a problem in the aplication Peterson also commented that the average lakeshore setback is not a problem w ith this application due to the location of houses on nearby properties With these notations. Peterson said the plan was still quite aggressive with the confined building Site. JcffMartineau responded that the applicant has addressed the size of the home, w hich Martineau says is consistent with the size of starter homes at 1092 s.f with a 534 s.f garage and 38 s f deck Schroeder commented that the house was small because it was bound by the size of the lot Peterson added if this w as new construction, this home would not be allowed to be built. Smith clarified that the second story does not extend over the master bedroom located on the main floor A future powder room area was noted on the floor plans but will not be completed at this time. There are tw o baths currently on the first floor. Smith suggested removing the wall to open up the den area so it could not be used as a bedroom The applicant commented that the w all may be load bearing. Smith asked that it be made clear that the second story powder room and first floor bedroom not be used as such Lindquist said that would realistically happen w hen sewer comes to the property. Lindquist noted there was only a partial alternate site for septic. Gaffron agreed but noted it would not be needed when sewer came in The existing system will be converted to a holding tank and the drainfield eliminated Schroeder asked what w'ould happen if it was found that sewer would not come for another five years. Gafiron said the applicant may then wish to replace the current septic system. The applicant reported that it was their intent to notify potential buyers of a 3rd bedroom possibility in the future. Lindquist asked if it was the applicant's intent to follow thru with this proposal and rehabilitate the house and then sell it, or sell it now as-is Martineau said the intent was to have the capability of showing potential buyers what the property could be. Gaffron noted that this could result in a buyer presenting a totally different plan to the Commission at a future time There were no public comments MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#3 - #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna Albee Estate - Continued) Smith asked what would happen if sewering was put on hold, a new septic sy'stem was built using the alternate site, and it failed. Gaffron said the property owners would then have to resort to pumping Peterson noted that there were many homes in Orono ih^t pumped. Berg said the application was then based on what might be or what could be done Martineau informed Berg that their goal was to modify the previous plan in order to present a variation to the Hedlund's and bring closure to the purchase if possible. The Hedlund's w ere sent the current package being review ed Smith said if that failed, then a tangible plan would be possible for another buyer. Martineau concurred noting it was a good use of the property. Schroeder asked what size holding tank was used and whether it could hold up to a 3 bedroom home. Martineau said they were under the assumption that the existing tank could be sealed and would w ork w ith Orono to determine if that was so It w as noted that the actual size of the tank was immaterial as whatever pumping schedule w as required would have to be done. Martineau said the pumping contractor would monitor the use of water to gain historic data and pump accordingly. It was determined that the holding tank was not relevant to the number of bedrooms in the house Lindquist noted that the review was similar to that of a sketch plan review. Peterson said it verbally was a sketch plan review but in actuality an application. Martineau responded he felt there was a high probability that the Hedlunds would move forward on the purchase. Smith asked Gaffron if there were any concerns with the bluff Gaffron said a grading plan would be required to protect the site during construction The driveway revisions could possibly require retaining walls. Other similar sites were noted in the area. It was determined that a grading plan would be required prior to the application going before the Council. Lindquist noted that the hardcover was decreasing in the 0-75' setback and totals were similar to what now exists. The setbacks were also similar. He saw the plan as being viable. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUl.Y 15, 1996 (#3 - #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna AJbee Estate - Continued) Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to approve Application #2135 with the understanding that a grading plan for the bluff area be presented prior to the application going before the Council A minimum of a 1500-2000 gallon tank would be required for pumping and the drainfield would be disconnected Variances for a street setback of 8 ’, hardcover, and average lakeshorc setback were recommended Vote; Ayes 5, Nays I, Peterson (to be consistent with his policy to vote against average lakeshore setback variances). Peterson noted the improvements made to the plan and said the proposal is consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood The application will be presented at the August 12 Council meeting (#4) #2148 WAYNE M. HOLMES AND JACKIE DAHL. 1390 PARK DRIVE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:54-7:59 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicants was present. Mabusth reported that their original proposal was to restore the majority of the house and add a new second story The applicants found that the foundation would not support the new second story and now propose to raze the structure and install a new residence. The property is located in the 1 acre zoning district. The lot width is met as well as all setbacks. A lot area variance is required. No negative comments have been received from any neighboring property owners. Peterson saw the application in the light of a formality due to code restrictions. He did voice concern over a cistern on the property and asked that it's removal or abandonment be attached as a condition of the application. The existing well is to be relocated, and the existing well will need to be abandoned. There were no public comments Mabusth noted that the applicant's have asked to have the application presented at the July 22 Council meeting. Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2148 with the addition of the removal of the cistern and existing well. Vote; Ayes 6, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#5) #2149 THERESA NORSTED, 2811 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARUNCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:59-8:17 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicant was present Mabusth reported that the application requires a variance to the average lakeshore setback for the construction of an enclosed screen porch to the lakeside of the property. The porch would wrap around the house to a bay addition and be located 11' in front of the average lakeshore setback line No other variances would be required During the review of the application, the applicant determined while speaking with neighbors that her plans for a detached garage may be impacted by her current imprpovement plan. The applicant asks for direction regarding the porch and the possibility of a 20'x22', 2-stall, garage consisting of440 s.f of hardcover. This would require the application be tabled to allow filing an amended application to include a garage. The property is allowed 573 s.f of additional structural coverage and 628 s f in the 75-250’ zone. The applicant is asking the Commission what would be reasonable for the property. Peterson said, with the objection from the neighbors regarding any change to the average lakeshore setback, no 3-season porch would be allowed if the applicant also desired a garage Peterson suggested the possibility of a deck instead of a porch Lindquist recommended staying within the average lakeshore setback Peterson said the neighbor would be able to see across a deck Mabusth noted that there was only I' in which to work with before crossing the average lakeshore setback line. Construction at grade level was suggested. Norsted said the original screen porch was made into a room She said she would like to enjoy the lake and questioned whether a narrower porch with no wrap around was a possibility She questioned whether a garage is possible with the hardcover and asked clarification on standards to determine if she should keep the property. She also questioned whether a deck would have to be at grade level or if it could be located on the second level. Schroeder asked if the neighbor, Mr. Stern, received a variance for his remodel. It was noted that he received a 9'' variance from applicant's side lot line but was within the average lakeshore setback Stem and Norsted's lots are similar in size The property on the other side is larger Mabusth noted that the garages on the adjoining properties were probably built in the 1950's with no record of building permits being issued, and they are located less than 1’ from Norsted's property lines. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 19% (#5 - #2149 Theresa Norsted - Continued) Lindquist commented that he would be in favor of a second stor> deck if it did not encroach into the averaee lakeshore setback Stem commented that he was strongly in favor of maintaining the average lakeshore setback. He did not wish to see a second story deck which he felt would obstruct his views. It was noted that trees would result in the same obstruction Stem replied that trees were within the rights of the applicant where a deck was not. Stem asked that the Commission uphold the code. Peterson said, although he usually voted against encroachment into the average lakeshore setback, other members did not necessarly do so Mabusth added that the City does listen to the comments from neighbors Stoddard asked the Commission to give direction regarding the garage Lindquist said he would be in favor of a garage no nearer than 1-2' from the lot line which might require a fire wall. Lindquist said a side setback variance would probably gain approval. Stoddard said a registered survey should be conducted During public comments, Susie Swanson noted that there was a garage on the site in recent times and questioned whether the felled garage could be grandfathered in Peterson said the Commission does feel a property owner is entitled to a garage in this climate and would attempt to come to a resolve Stem said he had no problem w ith a garage, only with obstruction of the views. Peterson moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2149. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#6) #2150 KENT AND SUSAN SWANSON, 3229B CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:17-8:25 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicants were present. 8 MINUTKS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JIJLY 15. 19% (#6 - #2150 Kent and Susan Swanson - Continued) Mabusth reported that the existing residence was built prior to the current Shoreland regulation.s The majority of the residence is located in front of the average lakeshore setback as it is located on a peninsula and lot is pie-shaped. The applicants are proposing a single-story bay addition which will extend no closer to lake than the existing 3' deck A 27 s.f kitchen expansion addition will replace an upper level deck at 76 s f. There would be no reduction in hardcover as a 3' path or walk exists below deck A second addition involves a kitchen expansion of 27 s f located over existing hardcover and upper level deck One addition is within the 0-75' setback and the other in the 75-250’ setback One addition would be 49' in front of the average lakeshore back and the other at 33' The setback of the lakeside deck exists at 58.5' and bay addition is proposed 65' to the lake. Mabusth added that she has received no calls from the neighbors, and there is no visual impact from the proposal Peterson informed the applicants for the reason for the average lakeshore setback. It is to eliminate a leap frog effect from home improvements He noted that the average lakeshore setback was meaningless for this particular property due to its configuration. Stoddard questioned whether both additions were necessary to meet the needs of the family. Peterson said there was a plan to complete both changes He continued by noting the location of the home close to the lake requiring a variance, the reductions made, and creation of a different type of structure for stmcture, the problem arises when there are continual increases in hardcover Susie Swanson replied that the setback was at 50' when the home was built meeting the code at that time. Mabusth added that the majority of the home was also out of the 0-75' setback. Smith was informed that the same architect was being used who originally designed the improvements ''.'f *he re.sidence in the early 1980’s and 1993 Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve #2150 for both additions Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Peterson, stating he was not opposed to the application but to the encroachment of the average lakeshore setback (#7) #2151 JOHN AND JANICE HURD, 2795 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:25-9:03 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicants, along with their architect, were present. 1 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#7 - #2151 John and Janice Hurd - Continued) Mabusth reported that the application was for hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to reconstruct a new residence after razing the existing residence There is a 20' encroachment by the existing house into the average lakeshore setback and is proposed at 25’ with an upper level screen porch. There is a minor excess of hardcover in the 75-250' zone suiting from hardcover in landscaping underlaid with plastic The 7® b excess in hardcover in the 250-500®b zone results from the driveway, turnaround, and landscaping underlaid with plastic. Mabusth said she has received 3 letters from neighbors voicing concerns with further visual impact with the mass of the house and the leapfrogging of construction closer to lake. The neighbors would like to see the home kept behind the average lakeshore setback The Hurd's architect. Mr Combs, said the original structure has been remodeled 4 or 5 times The existing foundation is unable to support further remodeling. Combs presented drawings to show the relationship of the proposed home to the neighboring homes and the site lines Combs said the garage. parkHg. and play area, which is highly used, will be pulled into the lot to create a safer play area and enable the residents to drive out onto Casco Point Road The plan calls for the use of the existing building site Combs said the applicants were sensitive to the average lakeshore setback and impacting of any views by maintaining this building site and angling of the home to better .he impact The home is also located in the mid-section of the lot so as not to infringe on the views Combs said most existing views are obstructed by trees Combs superimposed a drawing of the proposal over the existing to show that the new residence would be located in the same sweep line He said it was also his intent to work within the existing topography. Peterson said the concern is that the proposed structure gives a larger appearance to the neighbors. He noted that the 675 s f hardcover variance in the 75-25C setback and 7.3% in the 250-500' setback is minor when comparing the size of the home to the lot Mabusth asked is there a need to grant a hardcover variance'’ Peterson added that with the razing of the existing home, the Commission views the proposal as new construction. Council Member Kelley asked the Commission to review the boat house on the property. Peterson acknowledged with new construction, a boat house may not be allowed. This then results in the existing boat house becoming an issue The code calls for an existing boat house repair to be limited to board by board maintenance Peterson noted that this particular boat house was in excellent condition. MIMJTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#7 - #2151 John and Janice Hurd - Continued) During public comments, neighbor on the south side, Ron Grundeen, said his concern was with a second stor\' Peterson informed Grundeen that his views will be changed regardless of what is built on this property Grundeen said he w ould like to maintain the views he now enjoys The obstaiction of tree foliage was noted during the summer months. Lindquist reviewed the location of the e.xisting residence at 15' in front of the average setback and a proposed 24' to the enclosed porch This does not include the deck at 22'. Neighbor, Todd Theilmann, commented that the foliage was not an issue but was concerned over a "leap frog" affect with structures moving forward He acknowledged that the placement of the garage and play area more into the lot would assist in alleviating an unsafe condition Peterson commented that Casco Point neighborhood had many average lakeshore setback variances and saw it only increasing with more intensive building. This particular application becomes a bigger issue with the element of new construction Peterson noted the possibility of the need to remove the boat house on the property John Hurd said no mention had been made of the boat house during the designing of the house He said he placed stakes showing the new home construction which he feels is less oftensive from a view impact standpoint than the current residence. Hurd said the home now has 3 sub basements, and it is their intent to build the home as it should be rather than add on a further remodeling addition, which would be a hardship. Hurd said the boat house should not be part of the consideration and asked if there was any mention of boat house removal in the code Peterson said the boat liouse becomes an issue when principal structure is to be removed and new improvements involve variances Bill Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road, reported that the Hurd's responded to the neighbors' concern of visual impact by architecturally repositioning the home and .staking out to show the lesser impact He disagreed with Peterson's assessment that the boat house would have to be eliminated The code allow s for boat houses to be upgraded through the variance procedure as he had completed for his property The boat house is not to be improved Millet said the Hurd's hardship is in the need to raze the home but the possibility of removal of the boat house only increases the va’ue of their home presenting an inordinate amount of hardship upon the Hurd's Peterson responded that in new const aiction, this is the time the City has to rectify past mistakes that arc grandfathered in. He noted other agencies alro do not allow such boat houses MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#7 - 151 John and Janice Hurd - Continued) Schroeder acknowledged that the Commission does have the authority to allow the boat house to stay, but this proposal deems the property new construction requiring variances, which does raise the issue of the boat house. Schroeder said the people who live on Casco Point should be most concerned with the development of the area Hurd responded that this lot is one of the best in Casco Point and remodeling the existing residence would create a hardship. Theilmann said he had suggested the staking It is his opinion that the second story of the proposed home would eliminate the views for the neighbors. Stoddard asked the Hurds what their objection would be in complying to the average lakeshore setback Cohen said it was their intent to get back what they had with the const™r*ion and not to further disturb the land Stoddard said he also lives on the lake and "jH I'avor of the Hurd's boat house, but sees the average lakeshore setback as an issue. Pf .evitv* acknowledged that the hardcover was a mute point and the concerns were the averag Vixcshore setback and the boat house. Lindquist said any new construction would have to meet the average lakeshore setback. There were no additional public comments. Combs said the home could be moved back, but the Hurds would like to maintain the same views. Mabusth noted that the new construction was being located closer to the Gnindeen property. She said she had made mention of the boat house issue to Mr. Combs when the applicant was filed. Lindquist asked the applicants if it was their desire to table the application or noted the possibility of denial unless the residence was placed behind the average lakeshore setback. The Hurds asked that the application be tabled. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #2151. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#8) #2153 BEN YOUNG, 3106 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:04-9:08 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted The applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application was for an oversized detached accessory structure for a propert> located on the south side of County Road 6 just w est of the intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road and Sixth Avenue North. The structure meets the size limitation for a property of 3 92 acres The variance required involves the structu ’^e being placed 15' in front of the line of the residence. Peterson commented that the issue was not with the proposal but a matter of technicality with the code. Young was asked what color the structure would be Young said it would match the color of the home and be of a lapsiding Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2153. It was determined that no landscaping would be required. Mabusth asked that the ground cover be restored. Smith was informed that the structure would be used to house vehicles and equipment and used for storage. Young noted the 6' height of his current garage door does not allow for parking of his truck. Vote; Ayes 6, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#9) #2154 JOHN O’SULLIVAN/ERW'IN SMITH, 2380 SHADY^OOD ROAD - PROPOSED REZONING/COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN The Applicants, John O'Sullivan and Erwin Smith, were present, along with Consultants, Rob Thompson and Jim Coen Gaffron noted the addendum to the proposal which requires no site plan review at this time but only review of the rezoning issue The properry in question is being proposed for rezoning from the LR-IC district to B-5, which requires 20,000 s.f lot area The proposal is for a bank building with a drive-up teller area and a two-story retail/office building. A portion of Navarre Lane has already been vacated, and applicants will propose that the remainder be vacated. A stormwater holding pond is to be constructed. Parking is also being addressed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#9 - #2154 John O'Sullivan/Erwin Smith > Continued) GafiVon said the issue is whether the property should be rezoned from residential to commercial There is B-1 zoning on two sides of the property The northern side is an existing 1/2 acre residential neighborhood On the east side is an outlot containing a wetland area which is a density credit for the Lafayette Ridge neighborhood The site itself consists of 4 tax parcels, portions of w hich are within the 1000' lakeshore setback. Hardcover regulations allow for 35* o coverage over these portions of the property. GaRron reported that the Comprehensive Plan calls for the City to encourage private development in the Navarre area but to not adversely affect the neighboring property. Woodland areas are to be maintained also The plan calls for neighboring retail and professional services to be available Gaffron reported that there is pressure on Orono and other cities to provide aftbrdable housing and questioned whether this property might meet such a need In reviewing the property, Ga^on said it could hold three 1/2 acre single family residences With its proximity to the neighboring businesses, other options could be three 2-unit duplexes or M-6 density housing Gaflron asked that the Commission make their considerations in the scheme of enhancing the Navarre area and in consideration of the area as a whole. A study was begun in 1987 to review the Navarre area. Business owners w ere not interested in pursuing any changes at that time Peterson brought attention to the public infonnation hearings conducted by O'Sullivan on the projec* Peterson attended one of the meetings and noted favorable input from those in attendance Peterson noted only one variance appeared to be required for this proposal. However, the issue of rezoning is serious and has rarely been changed in the history of the City. Peterson continued that if such rezoning was done, this is is a logical location but use is a different matter altogether The comments Peterson heard at the meetings favored the rezoning. The neighbors were said to view the proposal as a viable option Stoddard said he attended both meetings and saw overwhelming support for the proposal. He noted that somethin'’ needs to happen with the vacated church property adding that the B-5 zoning was a less stringent application As to the housing possibility, Stoddard said he understands the need but noted having a proposal at hand from a local businessman. Stoddard did acknowledge the need for rev iew of a Navarre beautification plan or revitalization Peterson responded that the business owners showed no interest when presented with such an idea He added that the City would not proceed without that interest from the local businesses. MINUTES OF TilE ORONO PL.\NN1NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#9 -#2154 John O'Sullivan/Ervvin Smith - Continued) Peterson said he would not have envisioned changing the zoning one year ago but now views it differently, noting a recent proposal further south on Shadywood for a minor rezoning from residential to commercial for an automotive graphics business He suggested the two sites be considered together There are two residential lots combined with the lot that was considered for the auto graphics site Berg said she did not believe the Commission would want to tie the two properties together Goetten said the back lots were zoned residential, and the applicants had proposed rezoning Goetten said the Council wanted to look at all of Navarre before making any changes In discussing whether to look at Navarre as a w hole or property by property, Lindquist said it could not all be done at once l.indquist saw the need for developers to make anything happen and rezoning alone would not accomplish anything. Berg cited an example in Minneap>olis of a neighborhood revitalization. She said the business owners had to be convinced to become involved by oft’ering incentives Mabusth later noted in the meeting that the business owners back in 1987 were offered low interest loans but still had no interest Berg acknowledged O’Sullivan's pride in his property and saw the proposal as an improvement She also saw the need to look at the highest and best use of the property and w as not convinced residential w ould be the answer. She noted the neighbors were pleased with the proposal at hand. Mabusth asked for a reason why the property was not suitable for housing Berg said it was close to an intersection and not large enough to attract a developer. Peterson said he thought the neighbors would prefer a buft'er such as a church but that was not voiced. Lindquist asked about petitions for and against the project. O'Sullivan noted that petitions were presented at both information meetings as well as located in his store. Of all the signatures, he has only received one in opposition, and that person lives farther away from the site O'Sullivan said he has heard no opposition. Peterson acknowledged the change of heart from those neighboring property owners in this application as compared to the previous application for a shelter for this property O'Sullivan also questioned the affordability of land for moderate housing on the site It was noted that the public w as not notified of this sketch plan review. The next door neighbor to this property, John Erickson, was said to not oppose or voice positively for this proposal. 15 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 19% (#9 - 154 John 0'Sullivan.Erw in Smith - Continued) Schroeder asked the Council members present if there v^ as any long term plan for Nas arre Goetten responded that the original thoughts of planning were dropped after no interest was shown It is her hope that O'Sullivan's other project would encourage other business owners to take part in revitalizing the area Schroeder reiterated that there was no grand plan envisioning a movement to develope a systematic plan for the area Kelley said the area w ill probably not compete with neighboring city areas and saw a need to view it differently. Goetten acknowledged that the City has never done any TIF programs Kelley agreed that unless the business owners have an vested interest, any improvements would be for naught Berg added that there were alot of absentee ow nership properties within Navarre Goetten said it w as her hope if the new project was successful that it would energize the area Gaffron said plans considered but not adopted in the 1988 review included parking to be located in front of the buildings w ith some multi-family and institutional facilities as well a.s single and duplexes to the west Peterson suggested a sub-committee review the area but would not apply to this particular application He saw the proposed commercial development as an excellent choice over multiple housing options He asked other Commission members if the plan was appropriate for the site Erwin Smith noted difficulty in gaining upgrades in the buildings in the area. O’Sullivan added that with the new’ restaurant and other buildings, there will be improvements made elsewhere. Coen noted that the original O’Sullivans had been refaced Schroeder acknowledged O’Sullivan as a driving force to revitalizing the area O’Sullivan did see the project as a catalyst for others when new business is brought to the area Regarding rezoning, O’Sullivan commented that the church has been there for many years, and it may be hard for others to envision anylhing else He said the project at hand makes sense with the neighborhood and its municipal parking in creating a natural flow. O'Sullivan said their purchase option for the church property expires at the end of July, and only a short extension will be allowed. He said no developer or business will commit to a project without assurances that rezoning will happen Banks have shown interest in becoming a tenant but will not progress further without the rezoning. O’Sullivan said, once the rezoning issue is resolved, the project can be conformed to the code requirements He saw possibilities of clinics, light retail, bank, gift and greeting shops. He noted there would be no high intensive use of the property such as video or liquor stores. O’Sullivan said buffer zones would be created. During a meeting, neighbors asked how the property would be accessed and deliveries made. Reaction was favorable to the plans. Peterson noted that the majority of those attending walked to the meetings O'Sullivan said he has spoken with 80% of the business owners and all voiced favorable opinions of the project. They also saw no conflicting usage. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15. 1996 (#9 - #2154 John O'Sullivaa^rv^in Smith - Continued) O'Sullivan said he cannot move any farther forward without the rezoning He acknowledged that other developers would come forward at some future point hut noted the comprehensive plan's call for encouragement of private unification and coordinated projects O'Sullivan said the property could remain as it is, the existing stmcture could be used, or tax-subsidized housing is a possibility He asked that with the purchase option, the plan of presentation before the Planning Commission and Council in August be upheld Schroeder asked what studies w ere done to see if such a project wus viable O’Sulliv'an said he stood on the comer and viewed the situation He noted that since the proposal, others have approached him with interest in the project Coen added that a cash flow review showed favorable results Lindquist asked if O'Sullivan would require a certain amount of the building to have lease commitments prior to building O’.Sullivan said he would look at 70-80% Berg said leases would have to be the length of the mortgage It was noted that of the 23,000 s f size, 19,000 would be for office and retail use. O'Sullivan said he has spoken with the Engineer, Shawn Gustafson, who said the plan appears to be a good use and feasible from an engineering standpoint. The engineering issues will be addressed. In obtaining Commission viewpoints, Stoddard saw the plan as a good buffer to the residential area Lindquist said he was in favor of the project. Peterson saw the project and rezoning as appropriate and as a catalyst for the Navarre area Smith said she was okay with the plan She did not see it as the perfect buffer; though acknowledged, there may not be a perfect solution. Smith asked why B-5 was considered Gaffron reviewed the uses in the business districts noting the fit of the B-5 uses with the area B-1 had the most uses B-3 requires a 2-acre minimum lot size and accommodates shopping centers and multiple buildings. B-4 provided for professional and office but without any retail B-5 allows for such uses as municipal, office, clinics, art stores, office supply, real estate, barber shops, photo ?- es, hobby and gift, antiques, libraries, pet store, and other miscellaneous retail Other«. < areas in the City are to the west end of Navarre, with a furniture store, a non-confi-1 u: g gas station, a Dair>' Queen, a veterinarian ofifice, an auto parts store, and office space Schroeder said he liked the look of the project and asked for direction on how rezoning process occurs. Gaffron reviewed the process Schroeder asked that traffic flow improvements be considered and other businesses be encouraged to work with the City for revitalizing the area MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 (#9 - #2154 John 0’Sullivan/En\in Smith - Continued) Kelley said he was concerned with the time frame for the project in light of the need for rezoning. Goetten agreed that a month’s time was probably not enough. A scheduled public hearing will be held at the August 19 Planning Commission Meeting Peterson asked that signs be posted on the comer of the proposed project calling attention to the possible zoning to B-5 Berg suggested the notification be extended as far as Lydiard and Kelly Smith asked that neighborhood notification go beyond the last application. Coen said 300 notices were sent for their first proposal and the Navarre vacation. 600 notices were sent for the recent meetings Mabusth said a list can be obtained from the County. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#10) REPORT OF PLANNING CO^IMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 8,1996 Peterson attended the July 8 Council Meeting and inlbmied the Planning Commission regarding the outcome of the agenda items. (#11) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 17, 1996. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Lindquist will attend the August 12 meeting of the Council. ADJOURNMENT Berg moved, Schroeder seconded, to adjourn at 10:23 p.m. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Stephen Peterson, Chair Person