HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-22-1996 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 22, 1996, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
(*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City
Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are
available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet.
ROLL CALL
1. CONSENT AGENDA V'
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
^ 2. Regular Meeting of July 8, 1996
JOt
CfTy
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
*3. #2025 Michael Plank, 4115 Watertown Road, Final Subdivision - Resolution
4. #2134 Robert Albrecht, 1810 Shadywood Road - After-the Fact Variance - Resolution
5. #2136 Greenfield Corp., 180 North Shore Drive West - Preliminary Subdivision - Second
Amended Plan - Resolution
^6. #2137 WUliam Dunkley, 2709 Walters Port Lane - Denial Resolution
4i 7. #2148 Wayne M. Holmes & Jackie Dahl, 1390 Park Drive - Variance - Resolution
8. Melanie Rose, 1020 Brown Road North - Request to Waive Survey Requirement
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
ENGINEER REPORT
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
9. Condemnation Resolutions - Bike Trail
10. Stormwater Management Plan
11. Schedule 1997 Budget Work Session
-^12. Replacement of Sander - Public Works Department
13. Donation of ( - < f*‘r DARE Program Use
14, Transfer of Gcf'-'uii Fund Reserves to the PIR Fund
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
(*15.) LICENSES
(*16.) BILLS
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 22, 1996, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS
07/22
07/30
08/05
08/12
08/13
08/19
08/26
Council meting 7:00 p.m.
Joint Council/Park Work Session 8:00 a.m. - Park Master Plan
Park Commission 7:15 p.m.
Council meeting 7:00 p.m.
Representative Jim Ramstad - Town Meeting 7:00-8:00 p.m.
Planning Commission 7:00 p.m.
Council meeting 7:00 p.m.
I
Public A ttendance
Meeting Date O uu 'H <3 A , (cr
1 ,•— %
□
□
Council
Planning Commission
Park Commission
Other
Please fill out the information
REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME (please print)ADDRESS
PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
NAME OR NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5..
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
09U95.4
’ > ’
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 8, 1996
ROLL
•9^
The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present:
Mayor Edward J Callahan, Jr, Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel *abbour,
Charles Kelley, and JoEllen Hurr, w ho arrived at 7 50 p m Representing Staff were City
Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Public Works Director John
Gerhardson, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Zoning and
Planning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and Recorder
Sherry Frost Mayoi Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
i*Hl) CONSENT AGENDA
Items #9 and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended Vote;
Ayes 4, Nay’s 0.
(#2) REPRESENTATIVE TOM WORKMAN - DISCUSSION OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES
Staff had suggested to Representative Workman that, although the City is interested in
keeping communication channels open, it was not necessary that he attend the Council
meeting. Representative Workman indicated he is available to work with the City on
legislative issues of concern to the City
(#3) 1995 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCUL REPORT -
PRESENTATION BY AUDITOR
Finance Director, Tom Kuehn, and Dennis Hoogeveen, representative from the City’s
audit firm of Malloy, Montague, Karnowski. and Radosevich & Co , were present.
Hoogeveen brought attention to the auditor’s opinion on page 1 6 of the 1995
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which gave the City a "clean” or unqualified
audit opinion. He then referred to the separate management report, commenting on the
analysis and legislative matters The population class of the City and the per capita
revenues and expenditures were found to be within the state average of comparable
cities The public safety costs were high, but this is due to providing police services to
surrounding cities and is offset by revenues generated from this service Hoogeveen said
the financial trends found on page 6 for the City were good He commented that having
a healthy fund balance in the general fund allows for ease of budget transition from one
year to the ne.xt. helps keep the cash flow stable, and is reflected in the bond rating.
'
X,*
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm ’ COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#2 - 1995 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Continued)
The City's reliance on property taxes, •'eflected on page 7, is due to little assistance from
the state. Hoogeveen reported that the City has shown responsibility in maintaining low
tax rates
Regarding the enterprise ftinds, the small net loss shown in the water operating fiind, on
page 10, was offset by the depreciation on the contributed assets, with the net effect on
the retained earnings being a small increase Kelley related a direct correlation between
the loss and improvements to the Navarre water plant, and the City is not recouping the
total depreciation Hoogeveen said the sewer operating fund had a larger operating loss
than the water operating fund, due in part to increasing charges from the Metro Council
Wastew'ater Services, but that the City is addressing the situation by taking steps to limit
the inflow and infiltration of outside water into the sew er system He noted that the golf
course reflected a net profit of approximately $40,000. Hoogeveen said the Finance
Director and Admii .strator write a comprehensive and detailed transmittal letter in the
front of the annual report w hich is very’ informative and useful.
Callahan asked if the delay in timing of the report was due to the switch over of computer
systems during the year and if that switch over was performed competently. Hoogeveen
said the switch over was done competently but held up the report somewhat. It is
expected that this will not slow the report next year as the entire year will be on the same
system.
Jabbour asked if corrections were done adequately in relation to the deficit in the water
fund. Hoogeveen said he w as not aw are of the history, and a rate increase is usually the
recommendation made if a net loss is shown Kelley said he believes the expense should
be fully covered by revenue and asked if other cities have deficits. Hoogeveen said he
sees cities with and without deficits, but that in his opinion, Orono is correctly accounting
for the depreciation.
Kelley asked when an audit is expected to be completed. Hoogeveen said the timing is
up to the individual councils, but that the audit is typically conducted between about
April 15th and 30th and is reported by most cities by the end of June. Hoogeveen said
Orono’s audit did begin two weeks late this year.
Appreciation was extended to the auditor and the City Staff on a job well done.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
i*U4) REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1996
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council
Meeting of June 24, 1996. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL
MEETLNG HELD ON JULY 8,1996
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Wilson reported that the Park Commission would like to schedule a work
session with the Council regarding the Park Master Plan
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Planning Commission Chair Peterson had no comments at this time.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Melanie Rose, 1020 North Brown Road, asked the Council to consider waiving the
surv ey requirement in the replacement of her existing deck She said the repair is not
beyond the existing footprint or beyond the survey done when she purchased her
property. She saw no need for another survey since no changes were actually being made
on her property.
Callahan asked Rose if the Council could take the matter up at their next meeting. Rose
said this was satisfactory, and Callahan tabled the matter to the July 22 meeting.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(-#5) #2029 WILLUM SMITH, 2580 FOX STREET - FINAL SUBDIVISION -
RESOLUTION #3739
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3739. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#6) #2134 ROB ALBRECHT, 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE
The applicant and attorney. Bob Mitchell, were present.
Gaffron reported that the application was an after-the-fact hardcover variance for a deck
on the lakeside of the residence The deck is located out of the 0-75’ zone but results in
an addition of 165 s f of new hardcover. The Planning Commission has review ed the
application twice. The applicant proposes to mitigate the hardcover with the removal of
255 s.f of existing driveway and 115 s f of rock. This would result in a decrease of 205
s.f of hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Current hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 43.5%
where 25% is allowed Hardcover is proposed to decrease to 41.7%. The Planning
Commission recommendation is split. A motion for approval failed on a vote of 3 to 4.
No addhional motion was made.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#6 - #2134 Rob Albrecht - Continued)
Gaffron said the Planning Commission reviewed the 199 1 findings for an after-the-fact
driveway installed by a previous owner The 1991 Commission found the entire driveway
to be necessary to maintain a safe level of access and would not allow any trade oft' of
driveway. A condition of that approval was that there would be no further encroachment
of structure in the lakeshore yard to include any deck. Gaft'ron said by code the definition
of "lakcshore yard" means the 0-75 ’ zone. No clarification was included in the resolution.
Gafffon reported that the current owner also replaced an existing stairway to the lake
with a non-conforming 6'xl3' platform where only 4’ width is allowed. The Planning
Commission questioned whether adequate hardship was shown and recommended the
stairway system be brought into conformity
Kelley asked if a building permit was taken out for the deck. Gaffron replied to the
negative. Kelley noted it was curious that the deck conforms to the 75' setback line.
Attorney Mitchell said the applicant was of the opinion that he could replace the
lakeshore stairway board by board and is willing to reduce it to 4' if requested. Mitchell
said the numbers regarding the hardcover were correct. He noted the hard^ip pertained
to the slanting lakeshore in relation to the squared off homes in the area Mitchell noted
that the older portion of the house was located in the 0-75' zone, while the newer
portions were built behind that line Mitchell said the existing deck is small and under the
overhang resulting in no area in which to use the lakeshore yard. Nfitchell also noted that
the old surv ey did not analyse the width of the driveway, and he is of the opinion that a
reduction could be made in this area Mitchell said the turnaround area has never been
enough for more than one vehicle and noted that no parking is allowed in the street. The
small lots in the area and driveway conditions create a need for variances. In what
Mitchell believes brings clarity to the issue, the proposal results in the property becoming
less non-conforming. He noted that no additional variances were required.
There were no public comments
Jabbour asked for clariftcation regarding the decks Mitchell had spoken about an
existing deck but the deck in question is new. Gaflfon noted that there are two different
decks.
Kelley said he had no problem with the deck as matching hardcover is being removed in
the same 75-250' zone.
Jabbour noted that a building permit was needed.
1^1 Vt ■ -ni 1— ■
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY S, 1996
(#6 - #2134 Rob Albrecht - Continued)
Goetten said the concern in 1991 w'as over the driveway. The Planning Commission at
that time thought the driveway was too important to decrease She commented that the
applicant said the deck was built in order for the children to have an opportunity to play,
yet noted that there is a plan for a hot tub to be located on the deck Mitchell responded
that the tub would have a cov er
Goetten said with the notation of the prior Planning Comntission that no additional
hardcover be allowed, the fact of the property being substandard, a concern for removing
any of the driveway, she believ es the deck should be removed Goetten also questioned
tite ignorance regarding the lack of building permit
Jobbour said the stairway should be reduced to 4' but noted the proposal is for trade oft'
of ncm-structuraJ hardcover (driveway) for minimal structure (deck).
Callahan said he was concerned with the comments made in 1991, did not feel it only
meant the 0-75' zone, but did note there was no gain in hardcover
Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Application #2134 with the correction of
the lake deck being reduced to 4' and the addition of 165 s.f of hardcover with the
removal of 255 s f of asphalt. Jabbour asked that the resolution clarify the previous
comments that no additional hardcover be allow ed from the lakeshore to the street.
Goetten said she understood the 1991 Planning Commission recommendation and was of
the opinion that this Planning Commission made the right decision in their
recommendation.
Gaftron inquired if the motion included the 115 s f of rock and plastic. Kelley said it did
not. Gaftron said omitting it would increase the hardcover percentage proposed.
Mitchell said the removal of rock and plastic has already been completed. Kelley then
amended the motion to include the removal of 115 s.f of rock and plastic.
Jabbour noted the need to clarify non-structure versus structure with a deck being a
structure. Goetten said a deck has always been considered a structure.
Vote: Ayes 3, Kelley, Callahan, Jabbour; Nays 1, Goetten
(#7) #2136 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST
- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - REVIEW OF AMENDED PLAN
Greenfield Corporation was represented by Jim Pfennig. Laurie Lundeen, and Mark
Gronberg.
i
MINIFTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#7 - #2136 Greenfield Corporation - Continued)
Mabusth reported that the application was tabled at the June 10 Council meeting in order
to amend the plan of the 6-lot subdivision for removal of the private road outlot with cul-
de-sac serving lots 1,3, and 4 and replace with a private driveway outlot along the
northern property line. This has resulted in reductions in the width variance Lot 1
would no longer require a variance. Lot 3 is 142* wide, and lot 4 is 150' in width.
Mabusth added that Staff sees no reason for a temporary cul-de-sac for a driveway outlot
at less than 300* located at the northeast comer if a back-up apron was constructed within
road outlot for use of emergency and larger vehicles.
Mabusth said a concern of Staff' was the definition of *he access with the elongated lots as
Greenfieid Corporation will not be the builder Another concern *s the access being from
the north and not outlot B extension if the builder wants the house on lot 3 located to the
south. Staff would recommend that no building be allowed south of the septic sites on
lot 3 to include both principal accessory structures
Kelley asked Mabusth to define front and rear. Mabusth said this is determined by code
for a "comer lot" Kelley said, if that is the case, why couldn't the resolution state where
the front is located without the need to state where the access is located. Kelley said the
question would then be if the access by front defines the front in the code. Mabusth saw
no problem with this recommeiKlation if Council was in agreement.
(Hurr arrived at this time.)
Kelley said the house could be located in different directions if desired. Mabusth noted
the need to maintain a 30* setback to the side. Kelley questioned why the access could
not be allowed off of Outlot B Mabusth said it was a matter of aesthetics or design with
the mass of the residence facing the side lot line. Kelley was informed that the zoning is 2
acre but the widths were substandard. Jabbour added that residents move to this zoning
district to enjoy larger setbacks.
It was noted that Hurr originally suggested eliminating the driveway outlot
Pfennig had no additional comments at tiis time but to note Staffs thoroughness and
detail.
Goetten said she was still concerned with gerrymandering the lots in order to justify one
additional lot. She said she was not in favor of the subdivision noting her concern with
the building envelopes, the septic areas, the drainftelds. and the need for variances.
Goetten said the code should be adhered to and thought a PRD would be a better option
Kelley said there was not alot the Council could do if only a variance was required.
Goetten disagreed noting one lot could be eliminated.
MLNirTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#7 - #2136 Greenfield Corporation - Continued)
Gronbcrg said the width was tight for the lots due to the 50' outlet B. He said tfiere was
620' of width and 200' per lot width originally. M^usth added that there was r/o
flexibility in placement of private road as access had to be at northeast comer oi property.
Kelley noted, even with using the land from outlet B of 50’, lot 3 was 58’ short and lot 4
was 50’ short, Gronberg disagreed adding that those figures included the cul-de-sac.
Kelie>' responded that the feet measurement was taken back further and would still not
meet the requirement.
Kelley questioned making lot 1 wider because of the topography. He said this leads into
the concern expressed by Goetten of pushing the lots together. Mabusth noted that this
was due to both topography and wetlands
Kelley asked if there was any economic benefit to the developer in providing Outlot B.
He was told there was not Outlot B was proposed at the request of the City' to provide
access for the lot to the east Mabusth noted the direction given by Council with earlier
subdivision of Bayview Farms Mabusth said if the subject property was developed first,
then the extension outlot would be recommended Kelley questioned wby this developer
would be forced to do that. Gronberg said it was because of a safety concern noting the
presence of a crest of a hill Mabusth said the location was where the County stipulated
was safest for both developments. She noted the Council had discussed the future
development of the properties, and safety and minimizing any impact were the factors in
the earlier decision. Mabusth said in de\ elopment of this site, the access to the north was
seen as the best solution.
Jabbour said he ^aw a problem with granting any variance He added if restrictions were
proposed on the developers, then the City was obligated to give an option. He noted the
County's direction for the properties to be served from Co Rd 84. Mabusth clarified that
the Council had set this directive during the Olsoa'Geffre application of Bayview
Subdivision in 1995. Mabusth said the Council had wanted to ensure that the property
was not landlocked. An Outlot C was serv'ed by a private road made up of multiple
outlots and owners; but it was the hope that access would come from the property to the
west, which is the property now under consideration.
Hurr asked if the City was saying that this access was to be provided at no cost to the
property owner to the east. Mabusth said only Outlot B is being provided as a road bed
but is not bein'’ developed into a road.
Jabbour said access could come In from the eastern access.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#7 - #2136 Greenfield Corporation - Continued)
Kelley suggested that the road outlot not be platted. It wzs questioned what would
happen if the developer of the other property did not wish to pay for the use of the access
road. Mahusth said the City would take underlying easements. Kelley said this would
then result in the road becoming a public roadway
Gaffron said if lot 1 was pushed further down, the lots could have the appropriate widths
Hurt suggested Outlot B be platted She said it should be under the control of whoever
has control of Outlot A.
Goetten commented if Outlot B was required, the City would be allowing two lots to be
substandard and force developers to share an outlot. Hurr responded that the County
said the access should be at that location. Callahan noted that the County must givt
access to the lots Cook added that 50’ is still needed for access to the lot, arid it dees
not change the frontage Callahan said a lot could be eliminated. Mabusth commented to
plat only a driveway outlot would eiiminate width variances Callahan said the only way
to have the development without a vtriance is to eliminate a lot.
Pfennig said he would like to wo’k some mechanism out with the adjoining devdooer.
Jabbour commented that acreage was only one building standard. If primary and
secondary septic sites are not found, then there would only be one rite.
Callahan asked if Outlot B was intended to serve the property to east as well as north
from CoRd 84. Mabusth said the road outlot was to serve Outlot C, Bayview Fanns.
Hurr said she would not be as concerned with the variance if safety of access was
provided.
Kelley asked if a larger blowup of the area could be seen and suggested tabling the
application.
Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded to table the Application.
Jabbour asked to poll the Council for their current view. Hurr said she would like to
review the rest of the development in the area Kelley said if Outlot B was eliminated,
there would be no need for the variance. Callahan said he was concerned with tabling as
the applicant has responded to prior direction given and is being asked to come back
again. He would like to see no variances required. Goetten said her opinion is as
previously stated Kelley noted that the developer has brought the problems upon himself
when asking for a variance in the first place.
Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
i
8
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JUXY 8,1996
(#«) #2137 WILLIAM DUNKLEY» 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE - VARIANCE
The applicant was represented by Dale Gustafk>n and Carl Smith.
Gaf&on reported that a prev ious request for a number of variances resulted in an addition
to the existing residence of a new entry’, retaining walls, and changes to the driveway.
The house is located entirely within the 0>75' zone. The application is a proposal to
replace the deck with a small room that includes a therapeutic pool. The Planning
Commission reviewed the application at their past two meetings and suggested lowering
tilt rwf line or moving the pool to an opposite side of the house. The applicant then
revises; the proposal to include a lowered shed-type roof The addition would meet the
10' Sv . Dack but encroaches past the average lakeshore setback line. It also intensifies the
hardcover in the 0-75' zone. The lot coverage by structure would increase from 15.6%
to 16.7%.
Gafifron reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval as proposed
noting a decrease in hardcover of 23 s.f They found the visual impact from the addition
would be simil n to what exists. The applicant's representative showed that the other
options consideied were not feasible. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone would decrease from
35 4% to 35.2%. The 75-250' zone would remain the same at 49%. A large amount of
hardcover was removed during the last application review.
Goetten inquired what the original hardcover percentages were. Gafffon said the 0-75'
zone was around 40%, with 74% in the 75-250' zone.
The representatives had no additional comments at this time.
Hurr asked why the swim pool could not be located elsewhere in the house. Smith
responded that the size of the pool at 8x14' hindered any other possibility. Gustafson
added that the family and living rooms were the only rooms large enough but were used
in housing the family. The circular pattern of the rooms and interior walls also posed a
problem. Hurr said if the pool was of great importance, accommodations could be made
elsewhere. She did not feel a large femily and size of home were reasons by which to
grant a variance.
Callahan inquired about the elevation of the pool room. Smith said it would be located
about 4' below the height of the grade with a pump mechanism below.
Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission had discussed that the existing deck with the
screen wall were in such condition to need repair soon. The Commission also noted that
the impact from the proposal would be similar to that which now exists.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#8 - #2137 William Dunkley - Continued)
Chair Peterson said the Planning Commission cited the medical condition as a hardship.
Peterson said the deck would always be there with eventual replacement, and that its
enclosure would have a minimal effect Peterson added that the improvements made to
the property last year with the significant reduction in hardcover was an appropriate
tradeoff for the proposal and improvement of the overall property.
Callahan voiced concern ov er redesigning a house for purposes of only the applicant who
resides there He said he understood from the Planning Commission dis* .ission that the
applicant would otherwise come back with a propo.sal for improvement t the deck.
Hurt responded that with the encroachments as they exist, the Council not obligated
to approve a deck improvement. Goetten added that structure improvements also tend to
escalate.
Jabbour said he did not see the medical condition as a valid reason for the hardship with
the health facilities nearby Gustafson responded that the applicants were avid exercisers
He also noted the deck currently exists, and the improvement would result in a reduction
in hardcover Gustafson said the location of the addition allows taking advantage of the
overhang
Goetten noted that although reductions are very important, she was concerned with
moving into the next phase of structure
Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to deny Application #2137.
Hurr said, with the entire home located within the 0-75' zone, she could not see
increasing the amount of structure or deck replacement. If the reason is medical, Hurr
said the applicant needs to make accommodations and not the City for the applicant.
Kelley suggested a possible approval with removal of the structure if applicant moves
from the property. Jabbour responded that a hardship should deal with the land and not
the applicant Response was negative to this suggestion.
Jabbour asked what the applicant's next step would be. Gustafson said the deck was a
few boards short of being serviceable.
Callahan asked the Council what the difference was between this application and the
previously discussed application. Kelley said this addition was located within the 0-75'
zone and the last application was out of this lakeshore zone. This proposal was also a
change from a deck to permanent structure.
Vote: Ayes 3, Hurr, Jabbour, Goetten; Nays 2, Callahan, Kelley. Motion passed;
variance denied. Gaflron reported that a denial resolution would be presented at the next
Council meeting.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JIFLY 8, 1996
(“#9) #2142 ANGELA WOODHOUSE, 2625 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -
VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3740
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3740 Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MAYOR/'COUNCIL REPORT
Callahan reported that the moratorium on Hwy 12 development expires on July 22,
Since the study on the moratorium is incomplete, Callahan suggested extending the
moratorium to the first Council meeting in September Callahan said he would like to
come to a conclusion soon and not keep developers waiting
Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to extend the moratorium to the first Council
meeting in September, 1996.
Hurr noted that Staff .tad recommended an extension to October 30 and asked the reason
for the cnange in date Callahan said he would prefer to move forward, and if there was a
recommendation for a zoning change, plans could be reviewed. Hurr questioned whether
there would be time for a code amendment with public information meetings and
suggested extending the date to the second Council meeting in October.
Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to amend the motion to extend the moratorium on Hwy
12 development, Ordinance #148, 2nd Series, to the second Council meeting in October,
1996. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Callahan noted receipt of a letter from the League of Minnesota Cities regarding the
right-of-way issue The League has asked for a voluntary contribution of $560 or more
towards costs incurred in lobbying, providing information, and possible litigation to
protect cities in their control of the public right-of-ways. The is»ie involves the
placement of telecommunication cables in public right-of-ways and support of efforts to
regulate such placement. Callahan recommended supporting this effort and contributing
$1,000
Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to contribute $1,000 from the Contingency Fund to
the League of Minnesota Cities for purposes of issues regarding the protection of public
right-of-way. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Callahan said the Maxwell Bay public access construction will begin soon and is expected
to be completed this year. A public ceremony recognizing the access will be held.
Callahan reported having a discussion recently with Jim Grube of Hennepin County
regarding Co Rds 6 and 15 road improvement. Grube e.xpects proposals will be
presented to Council by the end of this month. Kelley said Co Rd 6 West by
Independence was now closed.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY S, 1996
(Mayor/Coundl Report - Continued)
Callahan and Jabbour met with Mn/DOT regarding the Highway 12 corridor decision
process,and expressed thdr appreciation for the excellent joint effort shown by the Luce
Line Committee and the North Side Group Opposition was expressed at that meeting to
a southern bypass
When asked by Kelley, Council members said they have not heard back from Wayzata
regarding the Wayzata Boulevard and Highway 12 semaphore issue.
Callahan expressed concern with the heavy traffic on CoRd 15 and its affect on fire
trucks being able to reach an emergency in a timely fashion. He noted that the problem
would increase once the construction begins on the roadway. Callahan also said he has
spoken with Long Lake Mayor Olson regarding a fire marshal, who voiced approval of
the idea.
ENGINEER REPORT
Cook said the Long Lake sewer taink flow information is still being looked at and is
requiting adjustment
Callahan said, in speaking with Mayor Olson of Long Lake, he had not anticipated a
problem in working cooperatively to provide expanded sewer capacity.
Jabbour said additional capacity would be required for any additional projects beyond
what is already in place. Jabbour said he would like to see a tandem process occur in
terms of review of sewer expansion alteratives.
CIT^ ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(#10) SAGA HILL PARK LAND ACQUISITION
Callahan reviewed his understanding of the Saga Hill park land acquisition to date noting
a concern over several problems Callahan noted there were two separate parcels of land
involved. The 9.5 acre tax forfeit parcel is for general park use. Callahan said the
general feeling is the land would be left as open space until such time as Council is of a
differing opinion.
Callahan stressed the need for an access easement to this 9.5 acre parcel. An offer for an
easement from the church has been received, but Callahan said he does not believe it
would serve the need for the land as it would be given with a restriction placed on the
usage of the land. If such usage would change, the easement could be withdrawn. He
noted the reasons for allowing an easement were too narrowly based.
I
12
r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#10 - Saga Hill Park Land Acquisition - Continued)
Callahan said a 20 ’ easement should be acquired on the Valek property. Council
members concurred Only a 10' easement is now available
Callahan continued that the 11 acre parcel is being purchased by the Minnesota Land
Trust, who would take title from the current owner, Midway Bank, but would be
dependent on the grant of $50,000 being obtained by the City from the DNR The grant
is conditioned on the land being maintained in its current state The Minnesota Land
Trust would like a conservation easement also placed on the land
Callahan noted that a rush decision was made in submitting the application as the deadline
for submission was the day following the approval given by the Council for the
application Because of this time conitramt. the application included information
supplied by the Saga Hill Group and Minnesota Land Trust, which was not consistent
with the beliefs of the City tow ards the land and surrounding vicinity. The application
submitted referred to the 9 5 acre parcel as being included with the 11 acre parcel with a
conservation easement to be placed over the entire 20 acres as a core area for a future 60
acre park Callahan said the DNR has verbally agreed to the separation of the 9.5 acre
parcel from the grant
Callahan said if the 9 5 acre ta.x forfeit parcel was at some time used for other purposes
than general park use, the City would be required to forfeit the parcel back to the
County, who would resell the land The City could purchase the property and have no
restriction on it This scenario is not in the current plans but is ^ possibility in the future.
The Minnesota Land Trust is viewing the two parcels together Callahan said if the
agreement was made and use of the land changed, the DNR has the veto right. The DNR
could allow the City the change the use of the land if replacement land is found
elsewhere 1 he condition of the Minnesota Land Trust conservation easement would be
a separate agreement with another entity involved other than the DNR. The question is
unanswered as to what w ill occur if the conservation easement with the Minnesota Laud
Trust is not approved by the Council, if the Council does not agree to the conditions of
the DNR, the grant will not be received.
Moorse concurred with the above analysis
Callahan said the Council has already made the decision to take the 9.5 acre parcel with
an easement, which is a separate issue from the 1 1 acre parcel. The decision for the
Council is whether the DNR grant should be accepted with the amendment placed on it
excluding the 9.5 acre parcel.
Callahan said he believes it would be a mistake in regards to public policy to take land
that is tied up forever. Any changes would also involve modification by two other
agencies He noted it would not affect this Council's plans, but conditions could change.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITT' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#10 - Saga Hill Park Land Acquisition - Continued)
Kelley was informed that the grant could not be obtained if Orono did not participate in
the land acquisition The grant is required to be made in the name of the City.
Jabbour noted that all of he groups involved were working towards the same goal but
with differing facts. Jabbour suggested proceeding, once all agree that the 11 acre parcel
be separated from the 9 5 acre parcel, and amend the grant application Council
concurred. Jabbour then suggested talcing the grant with the DNR conditions if found to
be satisfactory to the Minnesota Land Trust.
Hurr said she supports the grant, which is supportive of a possible parking lot and some
structure, but is not supportive of a conservation easement.
Callahan said he favored the conditions of the DNR if they are as stated and no more. He
was unsure if the description clarified the conditions of the DNR.
Kelley clarified that if the grant was taken with the DNR restrictions, the City would be
the owner of the property. If any upgrades were made, it would be the responsibility of
the City and not the DNR The City would maintain the property. The DNR would have
no title to or mandate of the property.
Jabbour added that the understanding would be that the 11 acre park land would be
passive in its use but the 9.5 acre parcel could be of a different use.
Council all agreed with the understanding as stated.
The Minnesota Land Trust was asked for their position.
Renay Leone, Director of the Minnesota Land Trust, said it was their position that the
interest be in perpetuity with some form of restriction for undeveloped or passive uses.
Leone said the Minnesota Land Trust hoped to include the 9.5 acre parcel but would
accept the separation of the two parcels She also said the organization would prefer the
conservation easement but would accept those restrictions placed on the property by the
DNR
Leone said the concern of the Minnesota Land Trust was their desire to have a continuing
role in bird-dogging the restrictions She suggested the Minnesota Land Trust be given
the legal authority for right of enforcement Without the legal right, the Minnesota Land
Trust would take the responsibility informally as citizens of Orono.
Callahan responded that the DNR does provide for monitoring of the land use. If the
Minnesota Land Trust would monitor it as an informal participant, it would be done as a
practical matter He noted that the informal watch could effectuate what is done as
opposed to two agencies having veto power.
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(^ilO - Saga Hill Park Land Acquisition - Continued)
It was noted that the earnest money placed on the purchase agreement would be lost if
the grant was not accepted Callahan said the City was in the position to move forward
with the grant if that was the wish of the Minnesota Land Trust. Leone sa'd she was in
favor of that position
Jabbour said there was a misunderstanding that the City of Orono was seen as pro
development, which was not the case Jabbour said the problem arose with the deadline
for the application and the lack of being privileged to reviev'.ing the conditions of the
grant He wanted to clarify the issue, noting it w ould have been easier if all of the
information had been laid out earlier Leone responded that the process was complicated
and drawn out
Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to draft a letter to the DNR requesting clarification that
the grant restrictions apply only to the 11 acre parcel. This correction is to be clarified in
writing by the DNR
Callahan said he was not anxious to take the 11 acre parcel without acquiring an
easement to the 9 5 acre parcel first He noted the possibility of condemnation in order
to acquire the casement He also asked that it be clear from the Minnesota Land Trust
that the DNR agreement is satisfactory Jabbour responded that there is a time constraint
due to the deadline for the purchase agreement Jabbour said the 11 acre acquisition
would result in one additional access to the 9 5 acre parcel He suggested moving ahead
with the grant and w orking out the details of the easement later. Jabbour said the
Minnesota Land Trust is bound by contract to complete the purchase and would convey
the title to the City without any other restrictions than the conditions placed by the DNR.
1 he approval would be necessary in advance of receiving the $50,000 Moorse
concurred that it was a reimbursement grant.
Jabbour amended the motion, Kelley seconded, that the $50,000 be taken from the Park
Dedication Fund after receipt of the necessary paperwork from the Minnesota Land Trust
regarding said stipulations and the DNR. The deed is to be received from the Minnesota
Land Trust at the time when the funds exchange hands
Leone clarified that the City would require an azreement stating the Land Trust's
agreement to the DNR grant for $50,000 with City ownership of the 11 acre parcel under
the conditions placed by the DNR. Callahan as ted Barrett to assist in drafting this
agreement letter.
Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
i
1FA# 1. .
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#11) PERMANENT APPOINTMENT OF POLICE CHIEF
Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the appointment of Gary Cheswick to the
position of Police Chief at a salary level of $53,830 effective July 9, 1996. Vote: Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
Callahan reported that Cheswick is welt received by the contract cities as well as his
officers
(#12) WATERTOWN ROAD OVERLAY
Moorse reported that the west end of Watertowm Road has experienced major
deterioration over the winter and requires immediate attention. The funds a' ailable in the
general budget for overlays were to be used for residential roads, and Moorse said these
overlays still need to be done.
Callahan said he w as concerned how Staff did not realize the w ork would be necessary
noting the time spent working out such a schedule. Gerhardson said the deterioration
showed up over the winter. Cook said the past winter was harder on roads than most
winters
Hurr questioned whether improvements on Watertown were desirable. Gerhardson said
the overlay was in the long term plan. Other portions of the road have already been
overlayed.
Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve a bituminous overlay for that portion of
Watertown Road west of Stubbs Bay Road to Tumham Road at a cost of $37,000 to be
funded from the PIR Fund, and to amend the 1996 Budget to reflect the expenditure
from the PIR Fund Hurr requested signs be placed notifying residents of the work in
progress.
Callahan said the expense was not a good example of budgeting foresight. Kelley
responded that Staff did come under budget last year. He noted that Staff does watch the
expenses and has shown the ability to make up costs in other areas.
Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#13) PREPARATIONS FOR THE SALE OF MCCULLEY ROAD PROPERTY
Moorse reported that the estimate on the cost for the survey and plat is increased to
$3,500. He did note that septic testing has already been done and will not be necessary.
Jabbour asked that Staff spend as needed, not as authorized. Moorse said he would get
quotes from several surveyors.
. i1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8,1996
(#13 - McCulley Road Property - Continued)
When questioning the cost, Hurr inquired if the property would be divided into more than
one lot. Moorse indicated in the affirmative.
Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to authorize expenditures not to exceed $3,500 for the
plat and survey and lot area variance process, to be funded from the General Fund
Contingency account, and amending the budget to reflect these expenditures. Vote:
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#14) CONTRACT FOR COMPUTERIZED MAPPLNG
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to contract with DSU, Inc. for digital mapping
services at a cost of $4,000 Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#15) SCHEDULING OF WORK SESSIONS
Work sessions were scheduled for Tuesdays, July 16, from 8:00 a m. to noon, July 23,
and July 30. The work sessions will discuss reorganization of the Public Works and
Building and Zoning departments, the planning application review process, and the two
alternative sewer trunk lines. The July 30th work session is reserv'ed for a joint meeting
with the Park Commission to discuss the Park Master Plan.
(#16) OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE TRAIL UPDATE
Moorse reported that the Staff has been working w ith the property owners of Silver
View Drive to address their concerns with the bike/hike trail construction. Moorse
aiggested the construction begin north of the railroad tracks and continue as the funds
allow. The problem with this suggestion is that the trail would then not be contiguous
and no grant funding would be received. If completed by the end of 1997, the grant
funds could be recouped.
Hurr recommended beginning the condemnation process and move ahead with the trail
construction. Gerhardson said negotiations could still continue during the process.
Hurr noted that only temporary easements were necessaiy for this section of the trail.
Moorse said the problem arises with the elimination of some trees.
Callahan said if the land was condemned, the City should make the necessary changes in
the plans to ensure that the trail is in the best location. Kelley noted the trail section by
the Dickey property and changes that w'ould have been made if land condemnation was
used in that area.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#16 - Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail Update - Continued)
Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to authorize Staff to begin condemnation process. Vote:
Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley. Kelley was not in favor of constructing a trail involving the need
for condemnation.
Callahan said he would like to see the construction done this year. He added if problems
occur, the construction should be^n at the north end and move south.
Kelley asked what will happen with the trail where it meets the property to the south of
Hwy 12 in relation to the house and garage He noted that the resident parks vehicles in
the public right-of-way The resident will be notified that cars are not allowed to be
parked in the public right-of-way
Kelley also voiced concern over plans for the trail as it crosses Hwy 12. He is very
concerned with signage and lighting, but especially children crossing Hwy 12 using the
trail system. Kelley said it was crucial that clarification of the plans is determined to
resolve a problem before it occurs Gerhardson will check with Mn/DOT on what
qualifies for a "no turn on red" designation as well as a "walk" sign added to the traffic
lights. Kelley said he was concerned that cars would not see the children crossing the
highway and turn into them
Callahan asked to see the for the bike/hike trail at the July 22 Council meeting.
(#17) OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ”NO PARKING”
Gerhardson reported on a proposal to install no parking signs along Old Crystal Bay
Road at the request of the property owner at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road. This request is
a result of a safety issue created by cars parking along the road to access the trail system
hindering the site distance for the owner attempting to leave his driveway. Gerhardson
added that the v urb and gutter installation increased the difficulty in pulling out of the
driveway. The owner is concerned that the completion of the bike/hike trail w ill
exacerbate the problem.
Hurr said the signs in place should be adequate Gerhardson said the current signs
covered 100', and he would like to post signs covering 300'.
Kelley said he saw it being a sporadic problem only during busier trail usage periods.
Kelley said the problem has always been there but has increased due to the Luce Line.
Hurr suggested using temporary signs. Gerhardson said those signs are not enforceable.
Council voiced concern with neighboring properties making the same request.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON JULY 8, 1996
(#17 - Parking On Old Crystal Bay Road - Continued)
Jabbour moved to authorize the no parking signs per the recommendation of Gerhardson
but received no second to the motion.
Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to deny the request for the no parking signs at 340
Old Crystal Bay Road. Vote: Ayes 3, Callahan, Goetten, Kelley; Nays 2, Jabbour, Hurt.
(#18) HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PAYMENT
Moorse reported that the initial cost was based on the estimate The revised cost is based
on the actual costs incurred. The amount previously paid was based on the bid, and
Mn/DOT is requesting the difference be paid.
Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve payment of the additional $8,825.39 amount
to Mn/DOT for the Highway 12 safety improvement project, to be funded form the MSA
fund, and to amend the 1996 budget to reflect this expenditure. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0,
CITY ATTORN E'V ’S REPORT
(#19) EXECUTIVE SESSION
Barrett requested an E.xecutive Session.
(•#20) LICENSES
There were no licenses.
(•#21) BILLS
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote:
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting to an Executive Session at 10:45 p.m.
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST;
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
JUl
11^2
1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^fTYQp
DATE: July 16, 1996
ITEM NO.
Department Approval:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building & Zoning Administrator
Administrator RevieweJ:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2025 Michael R. Plank, 411^ 'Vatertown Road - Final Subdivision -
Resolution______________________________________________
List of Exhibits
A - Firal Plat Resolution
B - Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 3576
C - Final Plat of Maple Place Second Addition
Drainage and utility easements originally dedicated in the plat of Maple Place designated along
the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3 of that same plat were vacated by the City on July 24,
1995. Via the final plat, the drainage and utility easements have been designated along the
nwwly defined division lines. The developer h^ fulfilled all conditions of the preliminary
subdivision approval including the submittal of all required documents.
The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted for Council’s review and action.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution of the plat of Maple Place Second
Addition.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PLAT OF MAPLE PLACE SECOND ADDITION
FILE NO. 2025
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision
regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of
a replat of two residential lots by Michael R. Plank (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-1 A,
Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would
allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances;
and
WHERAS, on July 24, 1995, Council adopted Resolution No. 3588 vacating
drainage and utility easements dedicated in the original plat of Maple Place that would intersect
the newly defined building envelopes; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting
regulations of the City, including:
Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3576, the resolution of the
City granting preliminary' approval of the replat of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Maple
Place.
Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility casements.
3. Creation of a private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and
utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility
easements over said outlot.
Page 1 of 3
4.The subdivider has created nonexclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility
easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting ano/or benefitting lots including
a declaration of certain maintenance covenants v.herein the abutting and/or
benefitting lot owners covenant and agree to permanently maintain and pay the cost
of maintenance for said future private road or driveway as it currently exists.
5.
> ‘
Dedication to the City of a flowage and conserv ation easement over .95 acres of
additional protected wetlands located within Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Place 2nd
Addition. Said easement shall provide for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or
drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as drainage easement.
6.Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and
covenants in the amount of $200.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono
hereby approves the plat of Maple Place 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to
the following conditions:
1.The subdivider and future owners are placed on notice that at some time in the
future if Lot 1 is further subdivided that issues of legal access and the required
upgrade of the existing driveway to a private road will bs subject to the City's
standards in effect at the time of the future subdivision.
2.Outlot A shall be retained in joint or common ownership with Lot 1. The
subdivider has created easements and covenants in favor of Lot 2 over Outlot A.
Covenants define Lot 2's responsibility for the shared maintenance and upkeep of
said roadway.
3.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin
County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before January 22,
1997 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies
of the easements and covenants noted above.
Page 2 of 3
'¥■
The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date
specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono
for subdivision review. Dated this 22nd day of July, 1996.
4
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
)
) ss
)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of July, 1996 by
Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a
Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 3
1-1.2
B
CITYofORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. a _____
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF A REPLAT OF
LOTS 2 AND 3, MAPLE PLACE
- FILE NO. 2025
M'-HEREAS, Michael R. Plank, May 22. 1995. filed a formal subdivision
application with the City for approval of a lot line rearrangement of residential property legally
described as:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. and Outlot A, Maple Place (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Stamtes 462.358 et. seq. and the Cit>' of Orono ’s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono
Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19, 1995 at which time all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 10, 1995, tlie Orono City
Council considered the subdivision application of a replat of a lot line rearrangement, noting the
followuig fmdings of fact:
1. The propert)' is located within the RR-IA. Single Family Rural Residential
Zoning District requiring a minimum of 5 acres of dr>' lands, 2 acres of which
must be contiguous within each newly created lot.
2. The property contains a total of approximately 19.34 acres of which 3.61 acres
is wetland. Each proposed lot exceeds the 5 acre minimum lot area requirement:
Lot 1
Total area = 13.18 acres, 10.63 dry contiguous acres
Lot 2
Total area = 6.16 acres. 5.1 dry contiguous acres
3. In 1988, Lot 2 w-as tested for a principal and an alternate septic site at the time
of new construction. Both sites have been approved by the City. As proposed
Lot 1 has over 10 dry acres, septic testing has not been required.
Page 1 of 4
GITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. R 5 7 ft ^
4.There is 10 acres of dry contiguous lands available for future subdivision of Lot
1 based on cunent code standards.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the
findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary
plat of a lot line rearrangement of Lots 2 and 3, Maple Place, per the survey dated January 13,
1993 by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions:
1.Subdivider and future owners are placed on notice that at some time in the future
if Lot 1 is funher subdivided that issues of legal access and the required upgrade
of the existing driveway to a private road will be subject to the City standards in
effect at the time of the future subdivision.
2. Granting of a road and utility easement over Outlot A to the City.
3. Dedication of .95 acres of additional protected wetlands located within proposed
Lot 1.
4.Outlot A to be retained in joint or common ownership with Lot 1 and that
sutdivider shall be responsible for creating easements and covenants in favor of
Lot 2 over Outlot A. Covenants shall govern Lot 2’s responsibility for the share
in maintenance and upkeep of roadway while Lot 2 is ser\'cd by single access
driveway and at the time of the future division.
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two
weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of
the month:
1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy
reduced to 1" = 200’. Drawing to include:
A. Lot lines platted per preliminary surv'ey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin
and Gronberg, Inc. dated January 1?, 1993.
B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 5’ wide on each side of the
newly defined internal property line.
Pace 2 of 4
L
CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 8 57 6
3.
c.Dedication of new wetland area located within proposed Lot 1 to be
designated as drainage casements on the plat.
D.Designation of a road outlet shown as Outlet A on the preliminary plat
referenced above.
2. Legal documents required:
A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or
others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all
other documents affected by such interest.
B.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements
currently affecting the property.
C.Signed and executed Conservation and Flowage Easement over the newly
defined wetland designated as a drainage easement within Lot 1 (copies
of the City ’s Conservation and Flowage Easement may be obtained at the
City offices;.
D.Signed and executed road and utility easement over the private road outlot
(copies may be obtained at the City' ofiices).
E.Subdivider may wish to include easements/covenant in favor of Lot 2
involving use of Outlot A, road outlot, and need to maintain current
driveway as set forth in Condition tfA above.
Fees to be paid: Total due: $200.00 for the legal review and filing fees of
subdivision and additional required documents.
Page 3 of 4
GITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L
NO. a 5 7 fi
Adopted by the Cit>- Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held this 10th day of July, 1995.
ATTEST:
orothv M.fTlalin. City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Edward J. Callah Mayor
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July,
1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
LINDA S.VEE
notary PUBUC-MniNkSOTA
H£NN£PW COUNTY
My Cominission Expires Jn. 31.2000
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
07/17/1996 10:13 473-4435 COFFIH £ 'SFO tEEF-'S PA-3E o::
I • 0
• • •» *•
« %
. •
JUl
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION isse
DATE: Julv 17,
ITEM NO.: ^ 4
Department Approval:
NaBM Michael P. Gaffron
Title Assistant Planning &. Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2134 Robert Albrecht, 1810 Shadywood Road - Variance (After-thc-
Fact) - Approval Resolution
Lbt of Exhibits
A - Council Action Notice 7/17/96
B - Approval Resolution
At the July 8 meeting, Council voted 3 to 1 to conceptually approve an after-the-fact hardcover
variance for the deck constructed on the lake side of the existing residence, directing staff to
draft an approval resolution for the July 22 meeting. The approval was subject to the
concurrent hardcover removals of 255 s.f. in the driveway and 115 s.f. in the entry area. A
further condition was that the 6' x 13' lakeshore stairway platform be reduced to the normally
allowed maximum width of 4'. Applicant is to pay the after-the-fact variance application fee
of $220 and obtain the appropriate after-the-fact building permits. Staff was directed that the
resolution shall indicate for the benefit of current and future owners of the property as well as
future City Councils that this property has reached its hardcover limits.
A resolution is attached for Council consideration and adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Make any appropriate language revisions and adopt the attached resolution to approve after-the-
fact hardcover variance for the deck adjacent to the house, subject to conditions noted.
PROPOSED MOTION; Moved by___. seconded by___, to adopt Resolution No.
granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subd. 2 and 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)
to allow hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed, for
property at 1810 Shad\"v\ood Road owned by Robert Albrecht. Vote: ___ayes,____nays.
1
i
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICATION NO. #2134
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: July 17,1996
TO:Rob Albrecht
1810 Shady wood Road
Wavzata, MN 55391
COPIES: Robert G. Mitchell. Jr.
Lindquist & Vennum
4200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
DATE OF MEETING: 07/08/96 VOTE: 3 FOR 1 AGAINST
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
To conceptually approve after-the-fact hardcover variance subject to the proposed hardcover
removals and subject to bringing the lakeshore stairway platform into conformity; and to direct staff
to draft a resolution of approval for adoption at their July 22 meeting.
Applicant or a representative should be in attendance at the Monday, July 22 meeting which begins
at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
M
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND
10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (1)
FILE NO. 2134
WHEREAS, Robert and Tara Albrecht (hereinafter "the applicants") are the
owners of the property located at 1810 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter
"the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 22, Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for after-the-fact variances
to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to
permit the construction of a deck located within the 75-250' setback zone constituting an
additional 165 s.f. of hardcover when hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone already e.xceeds the 25%
limit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
Fr.DINGS
1. This application was reviewed as .z oning File #2134.
I
2.The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1996 and
a revised proposal on June 17, 1996 and at that June 17 meeting voted 3 in
favor, 4 against on a motion to recommend approval of the requested variances.
Page 1 of 6
The City Council reviewed the revised application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and their -aomey, and the effect of the proposed variance on
the health, safety and welfare of the community, at the regular Council meeting
of July 8, 1996 and voted 3 to 1 to conceptually approve the requested
hardcover variance subject to specific conditions, and directed City staff to
prepare a resolution for adoption.
The City Council finds that:
A.The property has been the subject of previous after-the-fact hardcover
variances, the most recent of which was granted in 1991 to allow 5,080
s.f of hardcover within the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone.
B.The applicant in spring 1996 constructed a deck on the lake side of the
existing residence within the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone, such deck
comprising 165 s.f. of additional hardcover. Applicant proposes the
concurrent removal of 255 s.f of existing drivex jy and 115 s.f existing
landscape area hardcover, resulting in a net hardcover decrease of 205 s.f
in the 75-250' zone.
C.
D.
No variances other than hardcover are required for the deck.
The applicant failed to obtain a building permit prior to construction of
the deck and therefore is subject to after-the-fact investigation fees for
this variance application and all necessary building permits.
E.The applicants reconstructed the lakeshore bank stairway serving the
property at some time during the period 1991-1996 without obtaining the
required building permit, and that structure does not conform to the City
standards for such structures because it includes a platform 6' in width
where only a 4 ’ wide platform is normally allowed. The Council finds
that this structure should be brought into conformity and the proper after-
the-fact permit be obtained by the applicant.
Page 2 of 6
L,I
F.
6.
7.
H.
Council finds that the applicants' proposal to remove a 255 s.f. portion
of the existing driveway wll not make access to the property less safe,
because there will still be substantial parking available in the remaining
driveway and the necessary backup apron near the west end of the
property will still be functional to allow cars leaving the propert>’ to enter
County Road 19 (Shadywood Road) driving forward.
Council finds that the removal of portions of landscape hardcover which
were allowed by resolution in 1991 is appropriate as a means to reduce
overall hardcover in the 75-250* zone.
Council finds that once the current construction and hardcover removals
are complete, the property will have been developed to its maximum
hardcover potential, and it is the Council's intent that future property
owners and future Councils be advised that the current Council would not
approve future hardcover additions or intensifications on this property.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the applicants' attorney, and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and wouUl be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 3 of 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and
10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow the construction of a deck constituting 165 s.f. of additional
hardcover in the 75-256* zone, resulting in an excess of hardcover above the 25% hardcover
limit normally allov-j, subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
Hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback zone shall be limited to 4,832 s.f.
(41.7%) per the site plan and ^anacover calculations attached to this resolution
as Exhibit A. All hardcover rcc ?ls required per Exhib.i A shall be completed
before applicant is issued a Nt^dir^ permit.
Hardcover in the 0-75* lakesuoa -lO iack zone shall be limited to the existing 180
s.f. portion of the house and 90 - of lakeshore stairway/platfomi structure, for
a total of 280 s.f or 4.3% of the 0-75’ zone. This result shall be accomplished
by applicants reducing the 6' x 13' platform portion of the lakeshore stairway to
a width of 4'.
4.
5.
The property owner is advised that any future proposal to increase or intensify
hardcover on the property will require a new variance application and is unlikely
to be approved based on the findings of the Council noted in this resolution.
Applicant shall pay the $220.00 after-the-fact variance application fee, and shall
obtain an after-the-fact building permit for construction of the deck abutting the
house, and shall obtain an after-the-fact building permit for the construction of
the lakeshore stairway. Further, applicants shall make any revisions to said
structures deemed necessar>' by the Building Inspections Department to bring
said structures into confomiity with the Building Code requirements.
Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (July 22, 1997).
Page 4 of 6
6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
7.TIk undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of
the property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 22nd day of July, 1996.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
Property Owner (s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss,
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd aay of July,
1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 6
i J
‘ i
! t
\ !
I
• !
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within
aid for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and
acknowledged th't he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Page 6 of 6
-- rr -r---.J
JOtREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION “l. ^
DATE: July 17.
ITEM NO.: {j
Department Approval:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building &. Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2136 Greenfield Corporation, 180 North Shore Drive West
Preliminar>’ Subdivision - Review of Second Amended Plan
Exhibits
A -
B -
C -
D -
Amended Plan
Plat Map Locating Surrounding Area
Preliminary' Plat Approval Resolution/Exhibits for Bav^view Fat ms 2nd Addition
Final Plat Resolution and Exhibits, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition
Review of Amended Proposal
At the July 8th meeting of the Council, the majority of members determined that there was no
need to designate a future extension road outlot to serve Outlot C of Bayview Farms 2nd
Addition as an approved legal road access exists to serve Outlot C. The current division as
proposed will not require a private road outlot and will be served by a driveway outlot.
Applicant's subdivision would receive no benefit from the private road created to serve only
Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition.
A driveway outlot has been redesigned showing all lots meeting the required 200' width at the
50' front setback. The amended subdivision will require no lot standard variances.
Review Exhibit B, access to Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition will be served from
combined Outlots B and D, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. The curb cut for the private road
was approved by the County at the time of the subdivision review in November of 1994. Note
the resolutions and variance agreements all speak to the future ownership of Outlots B and D
should a private road not be developed for future access to Outlot C but via another access
road.
Irv Waukman, the current owner of Outlot C, Bayview Farms, has been advised by staff that
the road outlot extension to the west of his property will not be required by the City and that
his property will achieve access from combined Outlots B and D.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To either approve the six lot plat as amended per revised drawings dated July 12, 1996 by
Mark S. Gronberg or to deny amended plan, and to provide conceptual direction to staff so that
an appropriate resolution can be drafted for Council's formal action at their August 12, 1996
meeting.
I
I
I 1 I
«•
i •
fe,:.
oec
^ I-u1OfK a c^
. ^V.
^l iti ''
.vi*'11
■umM
(•!)
f3 Misoa
»w
;>
f;* *u
i;tk){
T*tJ
U)
a>
tCb 91
----6y—^
*i0 uv
V ^_____I_Am__•_______
R m ■i’ftfV------r- tiiiH3N7—rmtir lOT-arm—
(s)
■: m
19)
U)m
iivlLX.nw n 7.11
iZ)
(51) wK V u'liw
S?'«l
f
(6)r ^ ^ ■ III! *il4I
(U)
lulSi
I
iiM
W
Ab>aVHy!!l
trees
£Z- £'Z~U\'~
7 lilTJS^ KJSf
• \
MW- m
5®ii
«■D
"i V§
(H )
•fl louno
iL*ni 4
1-^.
ydy^stw :i
> .& -V
/
;<‘O0< AX
12'1*(V
SB MCZ ‘rd j.sr.ccri X 'xr;smi.
losoi'jW a ^ <^\ «•«*! 11 lAW K) 9 «t t;i
----
3.0 {t.w: <)1
e« io
\^ ri zi.e 9•Ir.^t•C9S
•-J lO'^
^ \
^ r\t
*r» >1 «r.
»>•
•
1«_________________fcrJV___o 1
_____________________________________1
i>
_____________^ i «_________^<U '
______________§L
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO 3 4
A RESOIAfTION GRANTING PRLUMINARY
APPROVAL FOR A PI.AT AT
4645/4665 BAYSIDE ROAD
- FILE NO. 1967
WHEREAS, Robert S. Oison of 4645 Baysidc Road. Irvin Gcffrc of 4665
Baysidc Road and K-P Propcrlies Inc. represented by Donald R. Peterson on August 26. 1994,
filed a formal subdivision application v/ith the City for approval of a residential plat of properly
legally described a.s:
L«'ts 1 aiid 2, Block 1. Bay view Farms, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter
the property ’’); and*•#1
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 462.353 ct. seci. and the City of Orono’.s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono
Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1994, at which time all person.s
desiring to be b.ea.rd concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak ihca'on; and
WHEREAS, the applicants .sub.sequenlly revised their proposal which was
reviewed by llie Planning Commission at their regular njceiing of October 17, 1994, at which
time Planning CciniTiission on a vote of 7 to 0 recommended approval of llic revised proposal;
and
V/HEREA.S, at iheir regular meeting held on October 24, 1994, the Orono City
Council consiucrca the subdivision app'ic.'uiori of Robert S. Olsen, Irvin Gcflre a.nd K-P
Properties liic., noting the follow ing findings of fact;
1.Ihe property i.s located within the RR-IB, Single I'amily Rural Residential
Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry biiildable land
wilhin each newly created lot.
2. The property conlair.s a total of approximately 19.5 acres, of which
ap[>ro.\iinatciy l.l acres has been delineated as wetland.
Page I of 6
I
* I
CITY of ORONO
RESOLITION OF THE Cm’ COUNCIL
NO__3 4^ 3
The proposed plat contains two lols (designated as proposed Lot 1, Ulock 1 and
proposed Lot 1. BUk'R 2). each containing an existing residence stracture,
proposed Lot 1, Block I being 2.73 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1, Block 2
being 1.94 acres in area. Proposed Lot 1. Block 2 technically requires a lot area
variance, but will retain ownership of an additional 0.07 acre outlot and may gain
up to an additional 0.28 acres as noted below, in order to meet the 2.0 acre
minitnum lot area requirement.
The septic system serving tlie residence on proposed Lot I, Block 1 is failing and
is intended to be replaced. On-site sewage treatment system site evaluation data
indicates that primary and alternate drainficld sites for current and future use are
available within proposed Lot 1, Block 1. No septic testijig is required for the
existing residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 2 since it is a pre-existing lot.
In addition to proposed Lot I, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2. four outlets
are proposed to be created with the following intent for each:
Outlot A: 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot
1, Block 2. at such time that Outlols B and D are used for private
driveway or road access to Outlot C.
Outlot B: 0.32 acre 50’ future road corridor providing access for future
development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed
using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlets
B and D, Outiots A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1.
Block 1.
Outlot C: 14.13 acre parcel intended for future development into single
family residential lols. Outlet C is intended to not be buildable for even
a single residence unless or until it is further subdivided and/or replalted
into one or more building sites.
Outlot D: 0.07 acre future road corridor segment to complete continuous
access in conjunction with Outlot B for future development of Outlot C.
In the event that Outlot C is furtl.er developed using road accesses from
adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlot D will
be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1, Block 2.
Page 2 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLLTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL
3 if. R :3NO. _____
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
Outlets B and D provide continuous access to Outlet C from Bayside Road. The
plaiting of Outlet D coincide.s with an existing access easement over Lot I, Block
1, Bayview Farms in favor of Lot 2, Block 1, Bay view Farms. The iiidusion of
I, Block 1, Bayview Farms in this proposed plat is the subject of an
agreement attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, which details the applicants ’
intent regarding the future use and disposition of Outlots A, B and D.
It is the City ’s intent that if Outlots B and D are developed for future road to
serve Outlet C, then the existing residences on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and
proposed Lot 1, Block 2 shall construct driveway accesses onto said new road and
eliminate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road.
It is the City ’s intent that in the event Outlets B and D are used in the future for
road purposes tliat .such road shall be constructed to City standards. Further, it
is the City ’s intent tliat in order to guarantee the future access to Outlol C,
applicants shall provide to the City standard road and utility ea.sements over
Outlots 3 and D. It is the City ’s further intent that if Oulloi C is developed
without the need for accc.ss via Outlots D and D, tliat such road and utility
easements will he vacated upon formal request of the property owners.
It is ti’.e City ’s intent that Outlots A. B and C shall remain in common ownership
until Outlet C is further developed, and that Outlet D shall remain in common
ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlet C is tuither developed.
It is the City ’s intent that at the time Outlet C is further developed, the City will
at that lime require the payment of park dcd.icaiion fees and the dedicaf.cn of all
necessary and appropriate public easements within Outlots A, B, C and D.
It is the City ’s intent that proposed Lot I, Block 1 and proposed Lot I, Block 2
grant the standard perimeter utility and drainage casements based on the
assumption that Outlots B and D will in the future become a roadway.
Although Hermepin County Department of Public Works has requested additional
right-of-way for County Road 84, no additional County road right-of-way will be
required of the developer consistent with the standards for a collector road in the
Orono Comprehensive Plan.
Paee 3 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE Cm COUNCIL
NO. 8 4 8
<J3,
13. A driveway eascmenc over Outlot D shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1,
Block 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B.
14. The single family residences existing on proposed Lot I, Block 1 and proposed
Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ILESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the
findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary
plat for Robert S. Olson, Irvin Geffre and K-P Properties Inc. at 4645/4665 Bayside Road per
the survey dated August 24. 1994. revised October 13. 1994, by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot
Surveys Company Inc., subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Outlots A. B aiid C shall remain in common ownership until Outlot C is further
developed. Outlot D shall remain in ownership with proposed Lot 1. Block 2
until Outlet C is further developed.
Outlot A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of
Outlot C, Outlet A shall be either combined with Outlot B and proposed Lot 1,
Block 1 if Outlots B and D are not used for road purposes, or Outlot A .shall be
legally combined with propo.sed Lot 1, Block 2. in the event that Outlots B and
D are used for roadway purposes.
Outlots B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as
separate unbuildable tax parcels until such lime that Outlot C :s further
developed, hi the event that Outlot C is further developed without a need for use
of Outlots B and D as roadway access, then Outlots B and D mu^ be legally
combined with adjacent properties.
Outlot C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be
issued for Outlot C until such lime that it is rcplatted into one or more buildable
lots.
In the event that Outlots B and D are used as an access road serving a future
development in Outlot C, the residences on proposed Lot I, Block 1 and proposed
Lot 1, Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Outlot roadway and
eliminate direct accesr, to Bayside Road.
Page 4 of 6
rr«soaso>ia&
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION COUNCIL
NO.
6. A driveway easement over O'itlot B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1,
Block 1 for coiitir.i'ed use of t!ie e\istimi drivewav in Outlol B.
7.Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 are subject to the standard
perimeter drainage and utility easements.
8. No additional right-of-way for Couniy Road 84 will be granted ultiiough Hennepin
County has requested it.
9. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be granted over Outlets B and D at
this time. However, the City wiM pot require payment of park dedication fees or
the dedication of additional public casements within Outlets A, B, C and D until
Outlet C is further developed.
10. The residence on proposed l ot 1. Block 1 shall be provided with a new septic
system within the time frame and requirements of die City code.
11. The metal .shed located at tlie northwest corner of Outlet C .shall be removed
within one year of final plat approval unless a complete formal application for
subdivision of Outlet C has been submitted by that date.
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two
weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of
the month;
1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy
reduced to i" = 200’. Drawing to include:
A.
B.
Lot lines platted per preliminary sur.ey by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot
Surveys Company Inc. dated August 25, revised October 13, 1994.
Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" within proposed Lot 1,
Block 1, such easements being 10’ in width along all cast and north lot
lines, 10’ in w'idth along the westerly boundary adjacent to Outlet D, and
5 ’ in width along the southwesterly and southerly lot lines; and within
proposed Lot I, Block 2, such easements being 10’ in width along the
west and north lot lines. 5 ’ in width along the easterly boundary, 10’ in
width along the boundary with Outlet D, and 5 ’ in width along the
southerly lot lines.
Page 5 of 6
fy-
CITY of ORONO
RESOUJTION OF THE Cm’ COUNCIL
NO. 8 ^ P 3
A. Title opinion advlressed to the City. All own^.s, inongage holders or
others with property interest indicated therein shall S’gn the plat and all
other documents affected bv such interest.
4
B. Tne applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded casements
currently at feeling the property.
C. Signed and e.xecutcd driveway easement over Outlet B in favor of
proposed Lot 1, Block 1.
Signed and executed •• ad and utility ^^greemo fttt over Ouilols B and D.
3.
D.
Fees to be paid;
A.Legal review and filing fees = $200.00
Total due: $200.00
Adopted by the Cilj Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota a, cguU.r meeting
held October 24, 1994.rTT^ • tC **•"•:»*u- a » * w*» c
w ^ P.f
1 ^5^200000
t ^AV*A ».C
'Dorothy M. %pin. City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24ih day of
October. 1994, iiy Edward J. Caliahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City CleiK of the
City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
.
S. VEE
• TT / PUQLiC • Minnesota
. ” HEMMEPIN COUNTY
My coinnr.lsslcn expires 8-12-96
■
1
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
rr«V3M0«l0c
resolution #8 4 8 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF ORONO
Doro±y M. Halim, City ofS
Minnesota, do hereby certify that I ^ gj such resolution in the Minutes of theCouncil of the City of Orono wmi the original record^^^^
proceedings of said City Council at »same is a true and correct
copy M satd^'resolmion duly adopted by llrf City Council at said meeting.
day of
In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and seal this---------
October * 199^
(SEAL)
AGREEMENT
Robert S. Olson and Margarel W. Olson, fee owners of Lot 2. Block 1. Bay view
Farms, and K P Properties. Inc., contract purchaser of said lot. hereby agree
that in the event that portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayvicw Farms shown as Oullol
C on the attached Exhibit A is replatled into buildable parcels aud a roadway is
dedicated or reserved within that portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayvicw arms
which is shown .ns Outlot B on attached Evhibit A. then the above named
parties hereby agree to deed to Irvin T Geffrc and Marjone L ^effre that
portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayvicw Farms shown as Outlot A on attached Ejh'bit
A aud a portion of Outlot C as shown on Exhibit A bounded by a line desenbed
as follows; Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 2. Block 1. ay stew
farms which is also the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1. Block 1. Bay view Farms;
thciicc North 89 4.>' 00" E distance 148 50 feet, thence S 00 45" 00" E distance
103 00 feet, thence S 89 45’ 00" W distance 148 50 feet, thence Northerly along
the west hue of Lot 2. Block 1. naysiew Faiuis to the po ut of begiiiniug and
there terminating
Irvin T. Geffre and Marjone L Geffre. fee owners of Lot 1. Block I. Bay view
Farms. as a consideration for such commitment to deed future Outlot .A and part
of future Outlot C. hereby agree to join in the application for platting and any
future plat of buildable parcels which proposes such dedication or reservation
of Outlot B as access to Outlot C as shown on attached Exhibit A.
Signed lJiis..jL^^^ay of
Robert S. Olson
Fee owners of Lot 2, Block 1
Bayvicw Farms
K-P PropcriL(^s. Inc.
By;
Contract purchaser of lot 2.
Block 1. Bayview Fan: s
Donald R. P'tcr'iOii
___L-
Irvin T. Geffre
.Marjorie L. Gj^ffre ' f (
Fee owners of Lot 1. Block 1
Bayvicw Farms, their heirs and
ssigns
BAY 7 M V 1 PRELIf.f?r>:ARY FLAT OF;;W FARMS 2ND ADDITIONCITY OF ORONO. CC'JK’TY OF HEriNEP'J'l LOT SURVEYS CO.
LAri> SURVEYORS
♦ » lag
•> %«•«!
• am « »
: •• % *W* '• ••
*« '..:h
I -ri. ' ";• •
•'• *:*4 a
•f .,•*«•» •% ^ •
"wt »W .’ '
t aM ••
I.
' /
!»*f*»t*»*
(•• t ••-!• . •••;•»*••
c«^<t •• ••••• •• •••-••
!•••• I ••4 Pml W**
• a*t ••■•<
|v*»^ ra
>\(f iglla*
i»i 1 ittai .. ••n::.
tc«a'« •» •• -•. ••!
«*•••••«•>• *•••♦
■ •* i>‘« i
•*;t •
*u.x iV •; o.’'i/<
i>- ■ v^VN-; .c,v
//-T••' . kV
b fti »'«
‘W
V. •
I • I •
\
.» • •«• • I rt
imt-rn • i .*• ***** '
%>•••• • • II »•••• •
jww*: • » •• •* ;•-•-»••• ••• «*••* <«•♦•
»•••»
.••I ••• . • •• •«•••
; <• • V''!l : \
a •• N % ' V\.‘‘ V ''' *‘ ' Y
• tl ••• •»-••••■•• «a* \*> ^*
10 (••••r •• !•••• •••*
t !
I •
r»00$ '••m I •*$ *■
(•••tar*
c
<orr
TYPICAL LOT
*0 000 0
»»*• |%a*****»
-------- I,
0M0»*» t
a............ .If
I •*« ta
I
I.
J..
•• • ; •••
••.* «i tm*
«««r4 «*(t V*
»
/C 4*\ju*t*
**tmm*4 • r«
••• I
• ««• ••
.:j
POOR ORIGINAL OOCUMEfJ
1
r
CITY of ORONO T)
RESOLUTION OF THF Cm COUNCIL
NO 3492
A RESOLUTION APPROMNG THE PLAT OF
BA^TIEW FARMS SECOND ADDITION
- FILE NO. 1967
^niERt)AS, the Cin' c'f Orono is a n:unicipal corp^aration organized and existing
under the iaus cf the State of Minnesota; and
U HERE AS. the City Coinicii of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision
rerulatio.'“s for the orderly, economic and safe development of land witbir. the City; and
\N HEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision 'ey
Roben. S. Olson of 4645 Baysidc Road, Irvin T. Gcffre of 4665 Bayside Road, and K-I’
Prepenies. Ine. represented by Donald R. Peterson iheieinaher "the subdividersand
VMTEFJEAS, on October 24. 1994. the City Council approved Resolution No.
.14S3 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 4645/4665 Bayside Road; and
WHEREAS, the propeny is located within the RR-IB, Single Family Rural
Kesideniiai Zoning Di.strict requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous di v bnildabic iar.u
within each nevviv created lot; and
WHEREAS, the propeny contains .a total of appro.ximstely 19.5 acres, of which
approxitTiarely 1.1 acres lias been delineated as wetland; and
WHERE.AS, lilt proposed plat contains two icts (designated as propo.sed I or ]
Block 1 and proposed Lot 1. Block 2). e.ach containing an existing residence sirucnire. proposed
Let 1. Block 1 being 2.75 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1. Block 2 being 1.94 acres in area.
Propo'ied Lot 1, Block 2 technically requires a lot area variance, but will retain c'vvnership of
an additional C.07 acre outlet and may gain up to an additional 0.2S acres as noted below, in
order to meet the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement; and
WHERE.AS, the septic system serving the residence on proposed i..oi 1. Block
1 is failing and is intended to be replaced. On-site seuage treatment system site evaluation data
indicates that primary and alternate drainfield .sites for current and future use are available vviihin
proposed Let i. Block 1. .No septic testing is required for the existing residence on proposea
Lo: 1. Block 2 since it is a pre-existing lot; and
Paae 1 of 6
i...(hi Or
CITY of ORONO
RESOLITION OF THE Cm COUNCIL
NO. -3 4^ :^_____
WHEREAS, in addition to proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1. Block
2, four outlots are proposed to be created with the following intent for each:
Outlot A: 0.2S acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot
1. Block 2. at such time that Outlots B and D are used for private
drivewav or road access to Outlot C.
Outlot B: 0.52 acre 50' future road corridor providing access for future
development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed
using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots
B and D. Outlots A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1.
Block 1.
Outlot C: 14.13 acre parcel intended for future development into si.ngle
family residential lots. Outlot C is intended to not be buildable for even
?. single residence unless or until it is further subdivided and or repiatted
into one or more building sites.
Outlot D: 0.07 acre future road corridor .segment to complete continuous
access in conjunction with Outlot B for futu>e development of Outlot C.
In the event that Outlot C is further developed using road accesses from
adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlot D will
be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1. Block 2.
*.^’HERE.AS, Outlots B end D provide continuous access to Outlot C from Bayside
Road. The platting of Outlot D coincides with an e.visting access easement over Lot I, Block
1, Bayview Farms'in favor of I^t 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms. The inclusion of Lot 1. Block
1, Bayview Fanns in this proposed plat is the subject of an agreement attached to this resolution
as Exhibit A. which details the applicants’ intent regarding the future use and disposition of
Outlots A B and D: and
\MIEREAS. it is the City ’s intent that if Outlots B and D are developed for
future road to sei^e Outlot C, then the e.xisting residences on proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and
proposed Lot 1. Block 2 shall construe: driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate t e
existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road, and
Page 2 of 6
WOS frM
CITY of ORONO
RESOLLTION OF THE CITk COUNCIL
NO. 3 4c
WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that in the event Outlets B and D are used in
the future for road purposes that such road shall be constructed to City standards. Further, it
is the Citv's intent that in order to guar.^nree the future access to Outlet C. applicants shall
provide to the City standard road and utility easements over Outlets B and D. It is the City’s
funher intent that if Outlet C is developed wiiiiout the need for access via Outlets B and D. that
such road and utility casements will be vacated upon formal request of the property ovsners; and
WHEREAS, it is the City's intent thaf Outlets A, B and C shall remain in private
common ownership until Outlet C is further de\ eloped, and that Outlet D shall remain in private
common ownership with p^roposed Lot 1, Blo*ck 2 until Outlet C us further developed, and
WHERE.AS, ii is the City's intent that at the lime Outlet C is further developed,
the City will at that time require the payment of park dedication fees and me dedication ol any
ddiiional necessary and appropriate public ease.mcnts within Outlets .-X. H. C and D; anda'
WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that proposed Lot 1. Block I and proposed Lot
i. Block 2 grant the standard perimeter utility and drainage easements based on the assumption
ihci Outlets B and D will in the future become a roadway; and
WHERE.AS, although Hennepin County Depanment of Public Works has
requested additional right-of-way for County Road 84. no additional County road right-of-way
will be required of the developer consistent with the siand.irds for a coUecior road as defined
in the Orono Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, a driveway easement over Outlet B shall be granted in favor of
proposed Lot I, Block 1 for ihe existing driveway in Outlet B; and
WHEREAS, the existing accessory metal shed located at the northwest corner of
Outlet C will becone non-conforming upon final plat approval due to lack of a principal
residence structure ar^ must be removed within one year of final plat approval unless it is
incorporated into a subaivision of Outlet C into t/uildable lots aut? made conforming at that time.
and
WHEREAS, the single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and
proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances; and
Page 3 of 6
^ V-.
CITY of ORONO
RESOLLTION OF THE CITY* COl^CIL
NO. ^
U’HERE.AS, the subdi\ider has completed all requirements of the platting
regulations of the Cit%, including;
1. Completion of the requirements of Resolution No. 3483.
2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utiii^v easements.
3.
4.
Granting of road and utility easements over Outlets D and D.
Granting of a driveway easement over Outlet B in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block
1.
5. Payment to the City of legal review and filing fees of S200.00.
NOW, TIFEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD, that the City Council of the City
of Orono hereby approves the plat of Bayview Farms Second Addition, Hennepin County.
Minnesota, subject to the following conditions:
1.
•»
Outlets A. B and C shall remain in common ownership until Outloi C is further
developed. Outlet D shall remain in ownership with proposed Ixi 1. Block 2
until Oiitloi C is further developed.
Outlet A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of
Outlot C, Outlet A shall be either combined witli Outlet B and proposed Lot 1.
Block 1 if Outlets B and D are not used for road purposes, or Outlot A shall be
legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2. in the event that Outlets B and
D are used for roadway purposes.
Outlets B and D are platted for fumre roadway purposes and shall remain as
separate unbuildable la.x parcels in private owmership until such lime that Outlot
C is fuaher developed. In the event that Ouiiot C is further develop d without
a need for use of Outlets B and D as roadway access, then Outlets B and D m.ust
be legally combined with adjacent properties.
Outlot C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be
issued for Outlot C until such time that it is replatted into one or more buildable
lots.
Page 4 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLITION OF THE Cm COUNCIL
NO-
5.In the event that Ouilots B and D are used as an access road serving a future
development in Outlet C. the residences on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed
Lot 1. Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Outlot roadway and
eliminate direct access to Bayside Road.
No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 w ill be granted although Hennepin
Count)' has requested it.
Payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of additional public easements
within Outlets A, B. C and D will not be required until Outlot C is funher
developed.
The residence on proposed Lot 1. Block 1 shall be provided with a new' septic
svsiem within the time frame and requirements of the City code.
The m-:al shed located at the northwest corner of Outlot C shall be removed
within one vear of final plat approval unless a complete formal application for
subdivision of Outlot C has been submitted by that date.
10.The aforesaid plat .shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County
Recorder's Office on or before May 14, ’995 together with a certified original
copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easement documents noted
above.
The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat 'nas not been filed b> the
specified above. In that event, it wili be necessar)' to file a new application with the Citydate spec
of Orono for subdivision review.
Pase 5 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLITION OF THE Cm’ COUNCIL
NO. 8 4
Dated this 14th day of November, 1994.
•7
Edivard J. Callahan.^., Mayor
ST.ATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing in.staiment was acknowledged before me on this 14ih day of
November, 1994. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor City Clerk of the
City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalt
of the Ciiv.
i: • . r.CTA* ' t^UrL.
few ' • KfriMS^If
comfT.itis cn
S. VF.E
5L.C - Minnesota
COUNTY
n expires 6-12-96
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
/-
agreement
Robert S. Olson a Margaret W. Olson, fee owners of Lot 2. Block 1. Bay view
Farms and K-P Properties. Inc., contract purchaser of said lot. hereby agree
that in the event that portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms shown .as Outlot
C on the attached Eahibit A is rcpiatted into buildable parcels aud a roadway is
dedicated or reserved within that portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms
which is shown as Outlot B on attached Eshibit A. then the above named
parties hereby agree to deed to Irviu T Geffre .and Marjone L. Geffre that
portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms shown as Outlot A on attached E\hibit
A and a portion of Outlot C as shown on Exhibit .-\ bounded by a line described
as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly comer of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview
farms which is also the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1. Block 1. Bayview Farms;
thence North 89 45' 00' E distance 148 50 feet, thence S 00 45" 00" E distance
103.00 feet, thence S S9 45* 00" W distance 148 50 feet, thence Northerly along
the west line of Lot 2. Block I. Bayview Farms to the point of beginning and
there Icrainaling.
Irvin T. Geffre and Marjorie L. Geffre. fee owners of Lot Block 1. Bayview
Faniis. as a consideration for such comiitmcnt to deed future 0"tlot A and part
of future Outlot C. hereby agree to join in the application for platting .and any
future plat of buildable parcels which proposes such dedication or reservation
of Outlot B as access to Outlot C as shown on attached E.shibit .A.
Fee owners of Lot 2. Block 1
Ba\vic\v Farms
K-P Prop^tUs. Inc- ^ _
liy: /—y president
Contract purchaser of Lot 2.
Block 1. Bav’icv Farms
Donald R. Peterson
7
Irvio T. Geffre
Marjorie L. Gj^ffre ' t ^
Fee owners of Lot 1. Block 1
Bnwiew Farms, their heirs and
Marjorie J
L.
Pr'ELIMIMArY PLAT OF;BAYVIEW A R M S 2ND ADDHCITY OF CRONO. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
j:a
LOT SURVEYS CO. L.fhO SURVEYORS^*«l«**rH*f**mmt • » !■(%t««it«M«. «u im
X*t «d«t« Vi»#
«»r***«. ^ ‘••Hi
♦ * . »•
, ;i .’In t
J#*M !»• »*»• %• * .
.*^T ti» J'}
•
K*\ *<•<*
••m>
i«« # ••*»§ I ••
(•MIt *1 ••.k>*f|
!• il •••■■«
l**l« I t*4 i
!»•«
4>«^. f«
Vtcr
(•I I. IlMi I,•• «•«•••»•
!• •«wrw*tl «f
(•<•• •••• 1 1 % •«•••
!••«* *»«•••« •• t
I ••••«••••• •
V *••««
t t<» • t t% «•••*:
;»•••! • 4 :t •«•••!
>»•»• • • t<
•• I *» *» ■ ••«■
941 •«••«)
.«• I. *•• i • t« *4*»»
til •••
t« ««•#«« •• •••
«•«»# •
I «•• »»t !*• •
•« *• •
*«#«**it<a* •
*»«t*«t**4 (•
• ».* •! MM>
//'
!•••.•« *
• •••»•« ••• t
• •.••* *l•
• •»>••« C*< **
r^B OBIGtHW-OOCUtt'
/r DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT
This agreement is between Kalhi Jo Pfeiffer, the owner of Lot 1, Block
1, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition and Harvey B. Worms and Kathj
Worms, the contract purchasers of Parcel B of Bayview Farms 2nd
Addition.
The owner of lot 1, Block 1 will allow the buyers of Parcel B. to use
the existing driveway on lot 1 for ingress and egress to Parcel B until
such time as a permanent driveway is constructed to said parcel.
The buyers of Parcel B intends to obtain permanent access from the
property lying to the west of said Parcel B when such property is
developed.
In exchange for this temporary use of the existing driveway, the
buyers of Parcel B agrees to maintain such driveway in useable
condition and will deed that portion of Parcel B previously described
as Outlot B and D i- Kathi Jo Pfeiffer if and when a permanent
driveway from the west is constructed.
All existing trees lying within such Outlots B and D will become the
property of the owner of Lot 1, Block 1 and may be removed from
the Outlots as desired by the owner of Lot 1, upon the signing of this
temporary easement document by the undersigned parties and
approval of such by the City of Orono.
Signed this dav of 1996
Owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayview Farms
2nd Addition.
Contract purchasers of Parcel B, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition.
Approved by the City of Orono
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
^ 1996
^OP,
DATE: July 17, 1996
ITEM NO.: C
Department Approval:
Name Michael P. Gaffron
Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2137 William and Susan Dunkley, 2709 Walters Port Lane - Variance
Denial Resolution
Zoning District: LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 acre, sewered.
List of Eihibits
A - Notice of Council Action 7/17/96
B - Denial Resolution
At the July 8th meeting. Council voted 3 to 2 on a motion for denial of the requested variances
for the proposed addition. Staff was directed to draft a denial resolution for adoption by the
Council on July 22nd. Such a resolution has been drafted and is presented for Council
adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt attached denial resolution reflecting Council’s action of July 8th.
, seconded bv , to adopt ResolutionProposed motion: Moved by ________
No._______denying variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subd. 14(C); 10.22,
Subd. 1 & 2; 10.55, Subd. 8; and 10.56, Subd. 16(L) - File #2137, William and Susan
Dunkley, 2709 Walters Port Lane. Vote: __ayes,___nays.
i
L.
— '
A
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICATION NO. 2137
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: July 17, 1996
TO: William & Susan Dunkley
2709 Walters Port Lane
Excelsior, MN 55331
COPIES:Dale Gustafson
1845 Wisconsin Ave. N.
Golden Valley. MN 55427
Carl Smith
610 Pleasant View Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
DATE OF MEETING: 7/8/96 VOTE:3 FOR 2 AGAINST
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
To deny the requested variances and direct staff to prepare a resolution for denial.
A denial resolution will be presented for Council adoption at the Council meeting
to be held Monday, July 22, 1996, 7:00 p.m. at the Orono Council Chambers,
2780 Kelley Parkway.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City
Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14(C);
10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 & 2, 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8;
AND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(L)
FILE #2137
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City
Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, William Dunkley and Susan Dunkley (hereinafter "the applicants")
are the owners of the property located at 2709 Walters Port Lane within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 4, Block 3, Walters Port, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) to allow lot coverage by structures to increase
from the current level of 15.6% to 16.7% where only 15% lot coverage is normally allowed,
and to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(A) to allow construction of a room addition located 40'
from the shoreline of Lake Mitmetonka where a 75' setback is normally required, and to
Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) to allow encroachment of the average lakeshore setback where
no such encroachment is normally allowed, and to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2, 10.55,
Subdivision 8 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow an intensification of hardcover in the 0-
75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, all of the above variances
required for construction of a room addition housing swimming facilities attached to the
existing residence structure; and
Page 1 of 5
1
WHEREAS, the Orono Planning Commission reviesved this application on May
20, 1996 at which time the Planning Commission tabled it for revisions. The applicants
revised the application which revisions were reviewed by the Planning Commission on June
17, 1996, at which time Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised proposal
on a vote of 6 to 1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised application on July 8, 1996
including the recommendations of the City staff and the Planning Commission, and the
comments and written statements submitted by the applicants and the applicants' agents and
consultants; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on July 8, 1996 voted 3 to 2 on a motion to deny
the variance request, and directed City staff to draft a denial resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Oiono,
Minnesota hereby denies the variance application described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning this property:
FINDINGS
1.This property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District and has an area of 24,205 s.f or 0.56 acres. The zoning district
requires 43,560 s.f or 1.0 acres in area.
2.Pre-existing improvements to the property include a residence structure located
almost entirely within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover or
structure is normally allowed, including various decks, patios and retaining walls
also located less than 75' from the lake. The property also contains a large
drivewav area in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone.
3.Pre-existing hardcover is 6,114 s.f. or 35.4% in the 0-75' zone where no
hardcover is normally allowed, and 3,386 s.f. or 49.0% in the 75-250* zone
where only 25.0% hardcover is normally allowed.
Page 2 of 5
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The Council finds that the intensification of hardcover in the 0-75' zone by
converting from a deck to an enclosed room in the 0-75' zone where hardcover
already greatly exceeds the normal standards, would tend to make that excessive
hardcover area more permanent in nature.
Existing lot coverage by structures is 3,764 s.f. or 15.6% where only 15.0% is
normally allowed. The proposed construction of an enclosed room for a
swimming spa, which would replace an existing open deck on the property,
would result in an increase in lot coverage to 16.7%.
The Council finds that the property as it currently exists contains the maximum
amount of enclosed structure that the property can support without creating
negative visual impacts as viewed from the lake.
The Council finds that no adequate hardship has been presented by the
applicants to support the request for an increase in the lot coverage by structures
on the property, when the property already exceeds the standard allowance for
lot coverage.
The applicants stated medical need for the addition is not considered a valid
hardship to the property, but is merely a hardship to this specific applicant.
Granting the required variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3(A) with which the applicants must
first comply in order that variances be granted. The Council finds that:
A.The property in question can indeed be put to reasonable use if used
under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property contains
a single family residence with many existing amenities.
B The plight of the applicants is not created by circumstances unique to
their property’ but is merely created by the applicants desire to create an
additional amenity on the property.
Page 3 of 5
11.
c.
D.
E.
F.
Q.
The essential character of the neighborhood will be altered if the
proposed variances are granted and the new additional structure in the 0-
75’ zone is allowed to be constructed.
The amount of light and air in the neighborhood would be diminished by
converting the existing open deck to an enclosed structure on this
substandard lot.
The conditions and zoning code limitations imposed and existing on this
property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning
district in which this property is located.
Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a
convenience to the applicants and the applicants have not demonstrated
sufficient reasonable hardship or practical difficulty to support the
variance requests.
The granting of this application is not necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicants. Denial of a
room addition for a therapeutic swim area in a location where such
structure would not normally be allowed, is not considered by Council
to be a denial of substantial property rights.
In review of the factual findings noted above, the Council finds that granting of
the proposed variances to allow construction of the proposed room addition
would be in complete conflict with the environmental standards for lakeshore
development within the City and would be detrimental to the public health,
safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader environmental principals
and goals set forth in its Community Management Plan and the intent of the
specific zoning district standards when dealing with matters of public health,
safety and welfare. Issues involving public health, safety and welfare are not
only resolved by securing the obvious traffic and drainage concerns, but the City
is obligated to provide the citizens with a designated and optimum level of
density, open space and quality of life.
Page 4 of 5
Adopted by the City' Council of the City of Orono on this 22nd day of July,
1996.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of July,
1996, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
•
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July 17, 19965*^
ITEM NO.: ^
Department Approval:
Name Jeanne A. Mabustn
Title Building & Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2148 Wayne M. Holmes/Jackie Dahl, 1390 Park Drive - Variance
Resolution
Zoning District:LR-IB
Lot area = 17,700 s.f.
Brief Review of Application
Applicants propose the razing of the existing residence and the construction of a new residence
that will meet all required setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district. In removing the existing
residence, the property is classified as undeveloped, and per Code lot standards must be
reviewed. The property meets the required lot width of 140’ at the 35* front street setback but
does not meet the required 1 acre in area as follows:
Required = 43,560 s.f.
Existing = 17,700 s.f. or .4+ acre
Variance = 25,860 s.f. or .59 acre
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the lot area variance as
proposed and noted the need for applicants to legally abandon an old cistern on the property.
The cistern will be taken care of under the demolition permit issued by City. The enclosed
approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution.
1
C''
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE NO. 2148
WHEREAS, Jackie M. Dahl and Wayne M. Holmes (hereinafter "the applicants")
are owners of the property located at 1390 Park Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter
"the City") and legally described as follows:
Lots 19 and 20, Block 13, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on
a property that is 17,700 s.f. or .4 acre where 43,560 s.f. or one acre is required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
1.
2.
3.
FINDINGS
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2148.
The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District requiring one acre in area.
The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1996 and
recommended unanimous approval of the variance as proposed based upon the
following unique findings and hardships:
A. A residence has existed on this property for over 30 years.
B. The property is ser\ed with sewer.
Page 1 of 4
4.
5.
C.The area of the property is consistent with the pattern of development in
the surrounding neighborhood.
D.A residence can be constructed on the properU’ and easily meet the
required LR-IB zoning setback standards.
The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propert>' are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above unique findings or hardships, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision
5 (B) to permit the construction of a residence structure and grants a variance of 25,860 s.f
or .59 acres, subject to the following conditions:
1.Applicants' contractor shall obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the
existing residence and abandoning of cistern.
2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (July 22, 1997).
Page 2 of 4
3. Violation of or non-compliance wth any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby £^ree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of
the property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 22nd day of July, 1996.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
Property Owner (s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENTMEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of July,
1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 4
and ^ble■‘'Stood hie r fheir k • fo »l^^^olittiofi • *•—SUCc^ssors^Q of r,-^O/Jo.if/e 3flc/
ayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )))On this clay of ss.within and for said County.
known „ be the pe^nfs) de'scrS
. 199 before me a Notary Public
acknowledged that he (they) executed L sZ^fs
Notary Public
^iS 22nrt
'ofJuly
Of the
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
^biS jjgy Qj-
SS.
. 199 before me a Notaiy Publicwithin and for said County, -----------
acZ^LgeV^h^'X ”™ar.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
/-
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE:July 10, 1996
SUBJECT: #2148 Wayne M. Holmes/Jackie Dahl, 1390 Park Drive - Variance
Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-IB
Lot area = 17,700 s.f.
Application: Applicants plan to raise the existing stmeture and install a new residence that will
meet all required setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district. If applicants are to rebuild a new structure
on site, a lot area variance is required per code. The following ordinance is pertinent tor this review:
1.Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B) - Lot area variance.
Required = 43,560 s.f.
Existing = 17,700 s.f. or .4+ acres
Variance = 25,860 s.f or .59 acres.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Plat
C - Property Owners List
Dl-3 - Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms
E - Survey
F - Hardcover Inventories 500-1,000' Setback Area
G - Elevations
Hl-3-Floor Plan
Description of Request
Applicants propose the razing of existing residence and construction of a new residence that will
meet all required setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district. With the removal of the existing residence,
the property is considered undeveloped and as required by code, lot standards must be reviewed.
The property meets the required lot width of 140' at 35' front/street setback line. The property does
not meet the required 1 acre area. Lot area variance must be granted before a building permit can
be issued for new construction.
The property is partially located within the Shoreland area. The first 100-150' of the property is
located within the 500-1,000' setback zone. Review Exhibit F, the property would be allowed 35%
hardcover improvements and is proposed at 20%.
u.
Zoning File #2148
July 10,1996
Page 2
As the existing residence will be razed, applicants have made temporary living arrangements but ask
that the application be scheduled before the Council meeting of July 22nd so that construction can
begin as soon as possible.
Hardship Statement
1I
Please rev lew Exhibit A. Applicants note the residence has existed on the property for over thirty
years. The area of the property is consistent with the pattern of development in the surrounding
neighborhood. A residence can be constructed on the property and meet the required LR-IB zoning
setback standards.
Issues for Consideration
1. Any issues raised by the Planning Commission.
Options of Action
To deny, approve or approve as amended. Any recommendation of approval must include the
condition that applicants' contractor obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the existing
residence prior to its demolition.
:
Application #51^3'
Date Received c- - / v~ ^
Amount Paid <i! ? ^' ^~0
L-M
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $220.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Rene\\'al Variance Fee $120.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
X
-
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address \ (^> r K ^
O - i ^ T O •x !
^ a tx\ V' '■ w
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0~7- ll~7 - 'Z3>—~'"7 X.
Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur\’ey.
Date Property Acquired_______________1 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also o\vn the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: residential ___other (specify)
Zoning District:_____________________________________
APPLICANT Phone (home) 7.^ - __
Name v .-V amal iVv 4- V.r e IV. ‘ Phone (work) — .
Address: • \_______ Citv: O-.- r- r~_______Zip:------. < .? ?'-/
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name __________________
Phone (home).
Phone (work)_
Address:City"Zip:.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ lOCr .CCO
Describe request in detail: P, rv>':^ \\c') ^ o>-CcA4Loy>>
f' • . Wf h'r t..cO-4- Cc.r (. S--\ r L V-V1 ^ _______________
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area ___Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage
Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY^ CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements:
A : A r. T r.-v^ 0 ________
]~7 7.oC> ^^iu. -\r >-• ck»C'P
fLiUery o 0 VjJ
K, X
O r A A
•■A-/ fnj.
V-^ Cv-A ^ (./Hr- t.t A ^
VWs rOxI- A r !>. <~A I i C;C ■ Pc-r Ll r. i Or^
(IA-C a - C-
X W\ X (anach additional sheets if necessary)
I to an ^c\. '^C'•j''f L2
I
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in
order for vour application to be considered complete:
1.
2.
3.
y
y
/
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Completed Application Form
Certified Property Ovmers L^st of o\mers within 150’, labels and plat map (you
must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of
Finance, A-603, Gom Center. 348-3271).
Certificate of Sur\ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/2" x 11” lor
reproduction.
Topographic sur\ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing
grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/a" x 11 for reproduction.
Sketches or plans of fioor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy SVz" x 11").
List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in
the projDerty. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other
persons you wish notified of this application.
Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yaur
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been ipcludedi
APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and'or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's Signature —XV-y
L A
(W Date
OWNER'S SIGNaWRE
The owner hereb>' acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
; g.^—.— ------------^ Date
/oj ctCL \ 1^1 U c'
OwTier's Signature
Applicant must '^hdt e all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning
Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each
month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning
Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please
make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building
& Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.
8
I
RUN DATE 0A/10/9ABATCH 502PROP ADDR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODRPROP AOOR OMNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR
PROP AOOR
OMCR NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP AOOR
0I«4CR NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADOR
PROP AOOR
OIRCR NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/A1>DR
38 07-117-25 A1 000500038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEOCITY OF ORONOCITY OF ORONOBOX 68 CRYSTAL BAYORONO m 5552338 07-117-23 61 0070 01376 PARK DR 0 F LARSON A T K LARSON DAYTON F A TERESA K LARSON 1376 PARK DR
hound 55366
38 07-117-23 61 0076
01600 PARK OR
ROHAN OLIYNYK
ROHAN OLIYNYK
1600 PARK OR
HOUND HH 55366
38 07-117-23 61 0080
01365 PARK DR
J K YOUNO A T L YOIRIG
JOHN A TERRY YOUNG
1365 PARK OR
hound HN 55366
38 07-117-23 66 0076
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO
VIL OF ORONO
CITY OF ORONO
PO BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55359
HEIMEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOJWATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWERS LIST38 07-117-23 61 006601361 NORTH ARH DR S H HALCHON A N HALCHON SCOTT N A NANCY HALCHON 1361 NORTH ARH OR HOUND H^l 5536658 07-117-23 61 007101380 PARK OR HAG RASHUS HAG RASHUS 1388 PARK DR
hound m 55366
38 07-117-23 61 0075
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
JANES LANG A ARDIS NIEHAFM
ARDIS H NIEMAW NOONAN
366 N OHASSO BLVO
ST PAUL HN 55126
38 07-117-23 61 0090
01355 NORTH ARH OR
C TULLY A E CHALGREN
C TULLY A E CHALGREN
1355 NORTH ARK OR
MOUND HN 55366
REP6RT no. P1655601 PAGE 938 07-117-23 61 006900038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DAYTON F A TERESA K LARSON DAYTON F A TERESA K LARSON 1376 PARK DRIVE ORONO HN 5536638 07-117-23 61 007201390 PARK OR HAYNE H HOLHES HAYNE H HOLHES 1390 PARK DR HOUND HN 55366
38 07-117-23 61 0079
01375 PARK OR
KATHLEEN A HURPHY
KATHLEEN A HURPHY
1375 PARK DR
HOUND HN 55366
38 07-117-23 62 0038
01379 PARK OR
K S NASSAUER A K NASSAUER
KERRY S A KIANN NASSAUER
1379 PARK DR
ORONO HN 55566
V. I.' «h • ¥•7
k"-
'Jw **'r*vl
r-..
TOTAL BATCH 502 00013
\
o
RUN DATE 06/10/96 HEftlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5601 PAGE 10DATCH 502
r-.
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF HY KtnHLEOGE AND BELIEF.
OATI
k
00
1
M /71• V <* ^
Tj
•*
. 'J - ■• *4
y
\\
I (we)
Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form
oilier Park Dr.
jj^rint name(s)][print address]
have reviewed the plans for the prop^'JctHfnptovement or proposed use of the property located
at l<ftQ fij/i" also refeTed to as Land Use Application No.-------------.
I (we) understand liiat in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the Cny
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbors
project or use requires Council approval.
h/yaujA V \(imC (o 199 ^
Property Date 7
Property Owner Date
♦♦♦♦*♦*♦*♦♦•****♦♦***•********************************"***********************
I (we) lAi ------
[print name(s)]
nf PAfM^bP..
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
\ O L,v- y[ also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------.•
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor
project or use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Dale
If vou have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
I (we)CU
Adja«.^nt Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form
___ nf I ^
[print address)
b-
/i j
[jjrini name(s)]
IL
H
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
2^ C also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------.
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbors
project or use requires Council approval.
3 6"h3L
Date
DateProperty Owner
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦••♦♦t************************************************************
I (we)
[print name(s)]
of i,>7W
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
y also referred to as Land Use Application No. ------------.
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the propert>- or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s
project or use requires Council approval.
Propeity Owner
kh l
Date
DateProperty Owner
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zomng Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
\
A
<; .*
I (we)
Adjacent Propert>' Owners’ Acknowledgement Form
n of IUVC7 S:i'>
[print nam^s)] [P^nt address]
N
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at Po.'wV^_____2ilso referred to as Land Use Application No.--------------•
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the Ciy
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's
project or use requires Council approval.
Property Owner
0£- Of?'^6
Date
Property Owner ^^te
U-ri j/,/ ( h j j
([print name(s)]r
^_____
nf O/ir-L
[print address]
have reviewed t^ plans for the proposed impro\ ement or proposed use of the property located
also referred to as Land Use Application No. ------------
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbors
project or use requires Council approval.
‘'rr6pe^ Owner Date (
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Lan se
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zomng Office at least 1 ays
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
m
S\
*9
0', f I
•o.
I
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repres- ntatlon of a survey of the
boundaries of Lots 19 & 20, Block 13, SAGA HILL REVISED Hennepin County. Minnesota,
and of the location of an existing building and of a..pr^ posed garage in relation
to the North line of said property. It does not purport to show any other im
provements or encroachments.
Scale
Date
0
1 inch = 30 feet
8-15-89/
Iron marker
COFFII. & GRONBERG, INC
Mark . Gronberg Mn. Lie. No. 12755
Engim ?rs. Land Surveyors and Planners
Long ! ike, Minnesota
r* •“ 'V" -T' /
«o.
t'*
1
botlndarlerof‘[ots'’l9 'sAG^S m‘RE5l9Fn'"i"^
to the North line of said Irollrfl Vt ^nJ ? a-pn posed garage in relation
provements or encroachment^ i"’-
Scale
Date
0
1 inch = 30 feet
8-15-89/ ^pujf
Iron marker
COFFII. & GRONBERG, INC
Mark . Gronberg Mn. Lie. No. 12755
Engin* ?rs. Land Surveyors and Planners
Long ! jke, Minnesota
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBA ~K ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250’250-500*500-1000*
FXISTINC. HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House ^
Len^ih Width
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway
3 ^
3i4 X
X
[Q%3i
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
-i- B I -/j ir> r. X 100
PROPOSEn HARDCOVTR IN ZONE
A. House 4 <ZhL
Length
Ki_X
X
X
Width
/ in_
B. Garage
C. Driveway
o
X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Dcck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
X
X
X
G. Other m
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
- B n.ioQ X 100 =
11S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F,
Ir\\.2r\ S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
j -//7ro S.F.
la %
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Cr>7P- S.F.
(.rill 20 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
I "'I ■ ~70tA S.F.
.^n - %
1
f ''\1
It.
A
B
1
I
A
B
J U M — 1 35 —THU 9:355 F'lov Bui lci«r*F> . 9 2
y r
C'U
ft
»•
.' r*rr.t~~»—1
c/
a '■* 5 1 V A ^•i«wwi VCm ’ •» a
« *M ««l M tl.
. r» - Ilf
. UCaj.
I
.JUH — is; —TMU F'loilp I d • r-
' 1
r -
. -iJ
^r*
.i /
r.v
*■
! ; -' ^)i Y -t; Cl/' '\!'
I *W* I T I ^
^ •- «■ 1^ »■—» •« •.. .• 0tfj M »■ ■miip I——— 0>i *« «—i» ~ #i
> « • •
V »;. I' 1 rt". V I \
Received Time Jun. 13. 11:0SAM
J U H — 1 3 —X M U ^ I 3 X I o B U4 I % €:§ mr 0 -4
•£
• . •
V * •
Received Tirne Jun. 13. 11:06 AM
— 1 s —T M U ^ r S T is> • 0
MKTS
If ^T\M
O
' I
-f^ m
»*?
1»*'
t t •V -;••sr^rr—
POOR ORIGINAL UOCUMENI
Received Time Jun. 13. 1I:C3A”
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CfTVc^
DATE: July 15, 1996
ITEM NO.: ^
Department Approval:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building & Zoning Adminisuator
Administrator Reviewed:
ff/'"-
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Dennis Kirby/Melanie Rose, 1020 Borwn Road North - Request of City
_________________to Issue Building Permit Without Required Survey_________________
Review of Request
In reviewing tq>plicants' letter and spe^ng to the Building Official, Lyle Oman. I am advised
the original deck was to be repaired by simple board replacements involving no structural
improvements. During the process of repair, it was soon discovered that the structural supports
also had to be replaced. The complete reconstruction of the deck either in the existing, an
expanded or reduced footprint requires a building permit. In order to complete the building
permit application, a survey is required to confirm that the reconstructed deck will meet
required setbacks. The City has reviewed the address files and has confirmed there is no lot
survey on record. Applicants' site plan. Exhibit B, is unclear as to where setbacks were
measured - from traveled road or original iron survey monuments installed at the time of the
plat?
The property is located within the RR-IB, two acre, rural residential zoning district. The lot
is approximately 41,745 s.f. in lot area and would be allowed approximately 6,267 s.f. or 15%
structural coverage. Structural coverage does not appear to be of issue.
Review Exhibit C, the staff sketch. The decks will be reinstalled along the east side of the
existing residence. The property is a comer lot and achieves access via Brown Road North.
The Code defines the west lot line or the lot line adjacent to Brown Road as the front lot line.
The north lot line or lot line adjacent to Country Club Road is a side street lot line and the
east lot line is the rear lot line (opposite the front lot line). Setbacks in question would be the
setback from Country Club Road and the rear lot line, both requiring a 50' setback.
In the mid-80's the City adopted a survey exemption procedure for property owners wishing
to install detached accessory stmctures of less than 1,000 s.f as outlined on Page 1 of the
building permit application handout. Exhibit E. The Kirby/Rose request involves an addition
to the principal stmcture and would not fall under the approved exemption procedure.
Staff Recommendation
Staff would recommend that applicants provide merely a certification of the north and east
setbacks of the decks to be rebuilt in order to confirm that a 50' setback is met. If the setback
is not met, applicants may either alter proposed deck plans to meet the 50' setback or apply
for the necessary variance.
r
A
.A
Request to City Council:
We are asking to be issued a building permit to proceed w ith the repair of our
deck without obtaining a site survey of 1020 N. Brown Road.
Reasons request should be granted
1. We are REPAIRING an existing deck - not adding a new structure. Wc
otiginally planned to replace a tew rotted boards but had to replace the
existing joists due to more extensive rot. The removal of the joists triggered
the need for the building permit and we were told by the city engineer that he
docs not have the authority to issue any building permit without a site survey.
2. The deck does not extend beyond the footprint of the house. The deck is
being built in an L-shaped comer of the house between the screen porch and
the garage. The house, screen porch and deck were all present when we
bought the property. The title company required the property be surveyed at
that time to ensure that all structures were within the property lines including
easements. It was determined at that time that the structures arc well within
the boundaries.
3. The replacement deck is the same design as the previous deck. It is in
fact slightly smaller than the original which further ensures that there is no
possible w ay that the deck will extend beyond the footprint of the house.
4. The site survey is an unnecessary expense for this project and will add
hundreds of dollars of additional expense without adding any value to the
homeowTier or the community. This project started as a simple repair job
and is already several thousand dollars more expensive than we had planned
to spend. We will be bound by the building inspections which will ensure
that we do not deviate from the original plan.
5. The requu'cment of a site survey will also delay our repair for weeks,
which will reduce the time we have to enjoy our repaired deck over the
summer and may cause us to leave the repair until next year. It would be
J
better for the appearance of our house and the neighborhood if we could get
this project completed as quickly as possible.
Please refer to the diagrams showing the location of the deck within the
footprint of the existing house.
Thank you for your consideration of our request. By making a reasoned
judgment, you can avoid applying an ordinance arbitrarily which harms us the
homeowner.
Sincerely,
Dennis Kirby
Melanie Rose
■i
' I ’T
±.
!Z
i3
<
2
(n
\ozo i<o^J l\)nf\i\,____Oror.fj ___lCJ^Lr~Scoi(e~'
/•
SHe. S urvie
i.
*Or >«c xav
93
«CjL^Kxi)(^0 t.
CjA«t«vxr
/-- ^-8H -A
i¥'
DecK
ou^:'
■7
3
So'**\
HfA /$■ 8®
I'l-^
• 2?
/ 3^
/i'
/
±.
SZo
IP'
0
<
d
2
2(n
• •
/•
C ir o <^.rj __V'' ‘f C> l"$cuie '^ ou h4 \ v<\^ ^s0/^^^--*^i+e-UC'\]<2
GwAVitL
_ 93
.C ft'»‘-r -t-tyrri To'f' I inc ( f.tr l.r^'O
Qi v'’» *• •• .',
3
Qj*\K*^OC
H OU-U'
!4!)l t>D
(
80'
7f
I'/—^-/3^
2?
-----y.
\
\
r
A.
>. !
<-J
1
BLILDCSG PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEDLllE
Each application for a building permit shall be accompanied by the data indicated below.
Failure to submit complete information will result in return of applications. Please read
carefully the listed requirements.
1.
A.
B.
I
Once aa unprovg
ALL APPLICATIONS
Completed application forms including all information required in the numbered spaces,
dated and signed by applicant.
Two copies of building plans, drawn to scale, together with specifications containing the
minimum information noted below: (requirement for building plans mav be waived by
the Building Official for smal' structures or minor work). One set will remain on file
with the City and one set will be returned to applicant.
Residential Plan reviews will require a minimum of 7 to 10 working days for staff
review. All new commercial structures must be approved by the Orono Council.
Modification of existing commercial structures will require a minimum of 2 weeks for
staff review.
’ 'immum Information Required:
1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (signed by a registered land surveyor). A survey
is required for all types of construction including new homes, room additions,
l*orches, decks and accessory buildings. The survey must include tl legal
description of property, location of existing and proposed structures '■'n . .
location of all proposed improvements .such as driveways, retaining walls, decks,
sidewalks, etc. Lakeshore lots must show existing and proposed contours in
minimum 2’ increments. (Refer to minimum survey standards sheet on page
5 attached.)
Survey Requirement Exemption - A survey will not be required for detached
accessory structures of less than 1,000 s.f. in total floor area when all of the
following conditions are met:*^
a) The area of the property exceeds the minimum lot width/lot area standards
of the zoning district.
Owner/applicant has staked the location of the proposed structure meeting
the required setbacks, and the property comer pins are staked and visible
and a plot map of the property drawn to scale has been submitted.
Owner/applicant has obtained written non-objection of most-affected
adjacent property owner.
*A survey will not be required for accessory structures without foundations and
with less than 120 s.f. of projected roof aiea if b and c are met.
A site inspection by City staff is required. Site inspection fee is S30.00 and shall
be paid with the building permit.
1
\ office.I
JUi
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July 18. 199^
Cfry,
ITEM NOi’O: ^
Depaftment Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title Cit>' Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Administrator’s Report
yItem Description:
Resolutions Authorizing Eminent Domain Proceedings for Acquisition of Bike/Hike Trail
Easements
At its July 8, 1996 meeting the City Council authorized staff to initiate the process of acquiring
easements for the Old Cr>stal Bay Road bike trail through eminent domain. Staff has advised
the property owners at 2775 Silver View Drive and 2790 Silver View Drive of the city ’s
intention to initiate eminent domain proceedings. Efforts to acquire the easements through
negotiations aie continuing. The property owner at 2775 Silver View Drive is preparing a
proposal that will include the purchase of the permanent easement and some level of tree
replacement.
In order to move ahead with the eminent domain process, resolutions authorizing the taking of
the land by eminent domain are required. The authorizing resolutions for the easements on 2775
Silver View Drive and 2790 Silver View Drive are attached for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to adopt resolutions authorizing the permanent taking of land by eminent domain for trail
purposes for the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail project at 2775 Silver View Drive and
2790 Silver View Drive.
• *
GITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ________________
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY TAKING OF LAND BY
EMESTNT DOMAIN FOR TRAIL EASEMENT PLTH>OSES FOR THE
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE/HIKE TRAIL PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City council has ordered preparation of a resolution authorizing taking
of land by eminent domain for trail easement purposes at the location hereinafter specified,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono:
1.That it is hereby determined that the temporary taking of the parcel of land set
forth in paragraph 3 hereof is necessary for the public good in order that said
parcel shall be devoted to trail purposes.
2.That the City shall take by right of eminent domain for trail easement purposes,
the land described in paragraph 3 hereof, and the City Attorney be hereby
authorized and directed to commence proceedings in the District Court of
Hennepin County for appointment of Commissioners to determine the damages,
if any, sustained by the respective owner and interests of the parcel affected by
such taking, as authorized by law.
3. That the land above referred to is more particularly described as follows:
The west 10.0 feet of the south 267.5 feet, and the west 25.0 feet of the north 150.0 feet
of the following described property: Lot 1, Block 1, Meyer Dairy Addition, according
to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder,
Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Property".
Adopted by the Orono City Council on July 22, 1996.
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
i
GITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PERM.ANTNT TAKING
OF LAND BY EMINENT DOMALN FOR TRAIL PLTIPOSES FOR THE
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE/HIKE TRAIL PROJECT
■\MIEREAS, the City Council has ordered preparation of resolution authorizing taking
of land by eminent domain for trail easement purposes at the location hereinafter specified,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono:
1. That it is hereby determined that the permanent taking of the parcel of land set forth
in paragraph 3 hereof is necessary for the public good in order that said parcel shall be devoted
to trail purposes.
2. The City shall take by right of eminent domain for trail easement purposes, the land
described in paragraph 3 hereof, and the City Attorney be hereby authorized and directed to
commence proceedings in the District Court of Hennepin County for appointment of
Commissioners to determine the damages, if any, sustained by the respective owner and interests
of the property affected by such taking as authorized by law.
That the land above referred to is more particularly described as follows;
The west 7.0 feet of the following described property: Lot 1, Block 2, Meyer Dairy
Addition, Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, according to the map or plat thereof on
file and of record i.i the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter referred to as the "Property".
Adopted by the Orono City Council at a regular meeting on this 22nd day of July, 1996.
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
V.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
Item Description:
ITEM NO: /O **•0110
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Administrator ’s Report
Stormwater Management Plan
At its July 16 work session the Council discussed a number of factors that have created the need
for city wide stormwater management planning. These include a substantial number of existing
stormwater drainage problems, the solutions for which could best be determined and
implemented within the framework of an overall stormwater management plan; the ability to
create a smaller number of sub-watershed ponds versus requiring v.ater quality ponding for ail
individual parcels or development projects; and the availability of a potential funding source for
sub-watershed ponds through the MCWD if the city is able to identify locations for ponds to
serve sub-watershed water quality needs.
Cost
Based on this discussion, the Council directed staff to bring a proposal for the completion of a
stormwater management plan to the July 22 Council meeting. A proposal from Bonestroo for
a surface water management plan is attached for Council review. The cost is $108,200. In
checking with other cities who have had surface water management plans developed, both by
Bonestroo and by others, it appears this cost is reasonable. Also, in talking with other cities for
which Bonestroo has developed surface water management plans, they have indicated they are
very satisfied with Bonestroo’s work.
Funding Sources
As part of the 1996 budget process, the Council designated $50,000 in the PIR fund as partial
funding for a stormwater management plan. In addition, there is currently $90,000 in the PIR
fund designated for stormwater drainage projects, and an additional $40,000 is proposed for
stormwater drainage projects in the 1997 budget. This would put the balance designated for
stormwater drainage projects at $130,000. $58,200 of this could be designated for completion
of the surface water management plan.
The City Engineer has suggested that the city institute a stormwater trunk fee to be charged to
new development, to both recoup the cost of the surface water management plan and to provide
funding for surface water management facilities. He has suggested an amount of $1,500 per new
residential housing unit.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the proposal from Bonestroo for a surface water management plan, based
on the attached scope of services summary and outline of project costs, be approved at a cost
not to exceed $108,200.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve the proposal from Bonestroo for the completion of a surface water
management plan, at a cost not to exceed $108,200, to be funded from the PIR fund; and
amending the PIR Fund budget to reflect those expenditures.
BONESTROO ASSOCIATES ^6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 0:02 ‘N0:1<5
1/J Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
!>«••••'•. ft -V.»r»•• . jM. ,t vr* *** •■ I' • *1 f It ■ t -,,1
, M. V , « I . • t • • i ..»• • . • 4.» ^ ^ •
k 'u'*.?* < i # - r «.• *-• « i • f . *.......i.i rt •
•Oir*- A R*«|i .K l» » • M ^ «%' tf.'k • *v »• ' V-.f *.* fP • “ * A »
>•»»» (j «r>i • ••►..rs* « » • • •' iV- tl. ' ' • ' r* I » ^ •
I k « r* i.t •. r • • T • f, » • -* • »«#.i . i«.. t»f» i f •
kl'.Pi'i ' .. h-* t 'M» » 1* I'‘
M »•••# i» •*- - ,»r.i ,1 V^ • >i.» ^
-10a,
4*.
^ /
July 18,1996
City of Orooo
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0006
Attn:Mike Gaffron
Assistant Planning and Zoning Adininistrator
Surface Water Management Plan Proposal
DR.A rile No. 13963
Dear Mike:
We are excited about this opportunity to serve the City of Orono in its efforts to manage its water
resources Enclosed is our proposed scope of services and fee for the preparation of a Surface
Water Management Plan (SWMP).
The scope is identical to that presented in our October 7, 1994 letter to you. A.s we nave not had
a chance to talk to you in detail since the preparation of the 1994 scope, we have not changed it
for tliis proposal. However, we would be happy to meet with you to fine-tune it to your current
nerds, .is well as to ihe latest mcihodologie.s we are u.sing. In particular, it may be possible to
improve on the wetlands protection element.
The fee has been increased by fCr to reflect otir cost increases over the past * .* » yr;irs. The
proposed fee of 510K.200 incorporates a reduction of S26,500 to reflect the . »t ’ . of the work
which will be handled by City Staff. In panicular, a good portion of the wcviard., protection
element can be performed in-house by the City. Again, we would be happy to meet with you to
tailor the scope and cost to your budget requirements. We estimate that the project will take
;gpprQxim:itely 9-10 months lo complete from ihc notice to proceed.
Please contact me if you need any addirional information Wc look forward to working with you
on this project.
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55I13-3S98 - 612-636-4600
\I
BON€STROO ASSOCIATES ^ 6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 0:03 NO:145
u
f'
i.
Sincerely.
BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC
cc: Ron Moorse, Orono
Glenn Cook, BRA
BONESTROO ASSOCIATES ^ 6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 3:04 -N0:145
CITY OF ORONO
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP)
SCOPE OF SERVICES SUMMARY
PHASE 1 - PROJECT INniA llON
Task 1 Organization and Project Initiation
a. Project initiation meeting vMth City Staff (review scope and schedule, provide list
of needed data). Develop schedule and progress reporting method.
Task 2 - Identify City, County, Regional, State and Federal Agency
Requirements.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
h.
1.
Minnebaha Creek Watershed District
Hennepin Conservation District
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Metropolilfto Council
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minne.svMA Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
U.S. Amiy Corps of Eugiucers
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Board of Water and Soil Resources
Task 3 - Collect and Review Existing Data for Water Resources Inventory.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Z-
h.
i.
J
1
tn.
u.
o.
P-
Record drawings for existing stormwater management system facilities
Aerial photography and contour mapping (City to supply 2’ contours)
Past studies and reports
City Comprehensive Plan (land use)
Population and population projections
Watershed Management Plans
Zoning maps
Storm sewer system maps
City street maps
Survey benchmarks
Water resources management ordinances
Fiscal information
Interviews with City maintenance staff
Physical environment data
Non-point source data
Past studies of Orono ’s water resources
' B0N6STR00 ASSOCIATES ^ 6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 i3 :05 N0:145
PHASE II - MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Task 4 - Develop Stormwater Management Guidelines, Goals and Policies,
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g-
h.
\.
J
k.
l.
m.
Water quantity management
Water quality management
Flood protection
Erosion and sediment control
Groundwater protection
Recreation, open space and wildlife habitat
Wetlands management
Lake management
Drainageway maintenance
Financing
Developer responsibilities
Citizen participation
Other
Task 5 - Determine Watershed Hydrologic Parameters.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Identify the critical levels of flood protection for which to design, based upon
chosen storm duratiou/retum frequencies and in conformance with Watershed
District criteria.
Review sub*district boundaries (20-40 Ac. in size); confirm basin inlet and outlet
points.
Revise the network of stormwater collection, storage and conveyance facilities for
each sub-basin.
Collect data necessary for storm hydrograph calculations and routing by computer
modeling
1)
2)
3)
4)
Runoff characteristics
Drainage area boundaries for individual conveyance segments
Lengths and slopes for drainage areas
Size, length, elevation and slope data on existing stormwater conveyance
facilities
Identification of lowlands and overflow drainage routes
BONESTROO ASSOCIATES ^ 6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 9 :06 W0:145
Task 6 - Develop Wetlands Protection Element
1
j
a.
b.
c.
d.
Obtaio and plot National Wetland Inventory, SCS Hydric Soils, and Mn/DNR
Protected Waters maps at half-section scale. Following preparation of composite
maps by City Staff, digiti2e these into AutoCAD files. Plot these at half-section
and full-city size.
Assist City Staff in the classification of waterbodies and wetlands by desirable use
Make recommendations for additional field investigation of wetlands and
subsequent adjustment of classifications and assist City in establishing a strategy
for City Staff to inspect remaining wetlands
Prepare wetlands map and waterbodies classification
Task 7 - Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling
a.
b.
c.
Perform hydrologic modeling to develop storm hydrographs
1) ImpeAiou.^ areas
2) Ultimate land use
3) Soil types, tnfil .ation capacitic.s, antecedent moisture conditions
4) Precipitation intensity, duration and frequency curves for five-year and 100-
ycar storms
Perform hydraulic modeling to confirm runoff conveyance and detention facilities
1) Subdistricts through system to district outlet
2) District through system to watershed outlets
3) Compute runoff volumes for routing and ponding
Summarize design data in electronic spreadsheet form
1) Pond storage volume, high water levels and outflows
2) Pipe capacities and sizes
3) Channel sizes and locations
Task 8 - Develop Water Quality Element
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Review existing data on local water quality
Perform watci quality uiodcliug
Analyze results of modeling and review with City
Recommend surface water treatnicnt
Recommend monitoring program
tl06lVOn>•o
' BONESTROO ASSOCIATES ^6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 0:07 N0:145
Task 9 - Prepare System Maps
a.
b.
c.
d.
Storm Drainage Area Map
1) Watershed Boundaries
District Boundaries
Subdistrict Boundaries
Pood Locations
Conveyance Facility Locations
Storm Drainage System Map
1) Watershed Boundaries
District Boundaries
Conveyance Facility Location Designation and Si2e
Pond Location Designation and Size
Intercommunity Flows
Water Quality Map
1) Pond and Treatment Facility Location
2) Water Quality Classification
Wetlands Map
n
3)
4)
5)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Task 10 - Prepare Cost Estimate and Capital Improvement Program
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Estimate the costs of recommended facilities
Duration/levcl of annual expenditures (1 year increments for 5 years, 5 year
increments for 15 years)
Sequencing of construction from outlet to upstream reaches
Establish priorities foi cousttucUou
1) Flood protection
2) Existing system upgrading
3) New coosiructioD for anticipated new development
4) Major interceptors/outlets, detention ponds
5) Water quality protection, enhancement
6) Wetland acquisition
7) Wetland banking
Evaluate funding sources
l3963>Orooo
BONESTROO ASSOCIATES ^ 6126361311 07/18/96 16:49 0 : 08 nO:145 1
PHASE III - REPORT PREP \RATION ^ NO REVIEW
Task 11 - Prepare Draft Report
a.
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
b.
c.
d.
Report Text
1) Existing physical conditions
2) Design Criteria
Rules and guidelines
Management system
Wetland identification aud classification
Costs
CD*
8) Monitoring program
9) Implementation Program
Design appendices
1) Storm drainage areas
Pipe size, location and capacity
Pood design duta
Water quality design data
Cost estimates
Mapping
Provide 15 copies of draft report to City
2)
3)
4)
5)
Task 12 - City Review of D. tft Report
Task 13 - Conduct a Public Meeting
Task 14 - Adoption of the SWMP
a. Pro\ide 25 copies of final report to City
File: SWMPHrs.Wb2 Dir j:\WRG\139M3863
.luU’
ORONO SWMP: Project costs
I. PROJECT INITIATION
1. OrganizaliofVProject Initiation
2. Agency Requiremenls
3. Collect and Review Data
II. MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
4. Guidelines, Goals and Policies
5. Watershed Hydrologic Parameters
6. Wetlands Protection Etement
7. Hydrologic^Hydraulic Modeling
8. Water Quality Element
9. System Maps
10. Cost Estimates and CIP
III. REPORT PREPARATION
11. Draft Report
12. City Review of RepcT
13. Public Meeting
14. Adoption of SWMP
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
ie-Jul-96 FHe «13963
1 ‘
& 'J» .
Total
$2,40G
2,000
4,300
4.200
6,700
22.900
26,400
20.200
15.900
2.300
19.900
4,000
1.900
1,100
$134,700
City
Portion
$700
700
2,700
2,100
t,700
12,400
0
3,100
0
400
1,600
300
800
0
8RA
Portion
$1,700
1,300
1,600
2,100
5,000
10,500
26.400
17,100
15,900
2.400
18,300
3,700
1,100
1,100
$26,500 1 $108,200
monrin•H308>inmoo
m
in
$0
fNJ
O
04
O
o
vO
VO
o
vO
o• •
in
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
*«enNQ
i99e
DATE: July 18, 1996 '**Q'0
ITEM NO: / /
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
hem Description:
Scheduling of 1997 Budget Work Session
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Administrator’s Report
The tax levy to fund the 1997 budget needs to be finalized by September 9. The Council’s
review of the proposed annual budget geneialU requires at least two work sessions. The
Council may at this time want to select a date and time for the first budget work session.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to select a date and time for a work session to discuss the proposed 1997 annual budget.
Jill
fftyOr
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July 17, 1996
ITEM NO.: , ^
/
Department Approval:
Name John R. Gerhardson
Title Public Works Director
Administrator Revievied:r Agenda Section:
Public W'orks
Item Description: Equipment Purchase Public Works
For 1996 the Public Works Department budgeted to replace one sander attachment for a dump truck.
The old sanicr is in excess of ten years old and has rusted and deteriorated beyond repair.
t have received two quotes with the lowest quote being $2,189 which includes sales ta.x and
installation.
The amount budgeted w as $2,200.
It is recommended to purchase the sander from Aspen Equipment for one dual spinner sander for an
amount of $2,189.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To purchase one sander from Aspen Equipment Co. for one dual spinner sander for an amount of
$2,189.
REQUEST EOR COUNCIL ACTION
do
Cny,
Off,
Date: June 5,1996
Item No:
Department Approval: Administrator Rev iewed:
Name: Gary Cheswick-^J^l^^^
Agenda Section;
Title Chief of Police
Item Description:"D.A.R.E." Vehicle
Exhibits:None
DISCUSSION
Attached is a letter from Officer Michael Carlson offering a collector 1967 Chevy
Camero Automobile to be used for the D.A.R.E. Program. This vehicle is available with no cost
to the city, and will be used to promote the D.A.R.E. Program by relating to a common interest
that most young people enjoy, v^hich is a unique automobile.
Many agencies in conjunction with the City D.A.R.E. Programs provide different avenues
for interaction with youth of the comn'.unity, with automobiles being a major point of interest.
The use of this donated vehicle would be for community gatherings such as ; Long Lake
Com Days, parades. National Night Out, D.A.R.E. functions, Buckiiom Days, etc.
Responsibility for the vehicle would be handled by Michael Carlson.
It is the department’s Ijclief that tools of this type add to Community-Police
communications and provide a positive influence.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Request permission to accept donation of vehicle to be used in D.A.R.E. Drug Awareness
Program.
i
< '
c •
Orono Police Department
Chief Gary Cheswick
2730 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Dear Gary;
In reference to our phone conversation on 07-01-96,1 am willing to offer the Orono
Police Department the use of my vehicle, a 1967 Chev Camaro, for use in the D.A.R.E.
program, or for use in the C.O.P. (community policing) program.
As a Part-Time Police Officer for the City of Orono, I will take full responsibility for the
vehicle, and would not in any way hold the City of Orono, the Orono Police Department,
or any of its representives or agents liable for any damage to, or repair of the vehicle,
or any liability that would arise out of its use as a promotional tool.
I feel that the use of the car would not only promote the D.A.R.E. Program, and the fight
against drugs in our community, but it would also promote a positive image to the
Orono Police Department, and the City of Orono, taking a positive Law Enforcement
approach to a growing problem in our society. The car could be used in parades,
display at local car shows, and of course at the Orono School for the graduation from
the D.A.R.E. program.
This project would show the community that the City of Orono, and its Police
Department, really DOES care about the future of our children, and the fight against
drugs in our community. "ORONO CARES, SAY NO TO DRUGS"
Respectfully submit^;
Micnbe! B. Carlson
•JUi
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July 18, 19%
^99g
ITEM NO
= //
Administrator Reviewed:
fM-
Agenda Section:
Administrator’s Report
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
Item Description:
Transfer of General Fund Reserves to Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund
As part of the 1996 budget development and approval process, the Council authorized the
transfer of $100,000 from the General Fund Reserves to the PIR Fund to be designated as
follows; $50,000 as partial funding for a Stomiv^ater Management Plan and $50,000 as funding
for infrastructure improvements (stormwater drainage projects).
In addition, th** Council directed that $100,000 of the General Fund Reserves be designated as
contingency funding in the case of a reduction in the city’s HACA revenue, and that $1(X),(X)0
of General Fund Reserves be designated as a contingency amount in the case of a significant
reduction in contract revenue.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
1.Motion to approve the transfer of $100,000 of reserves from the General Fund to the PIR
Fund, with $50,000 designated toward a Stormwater Management Plan and $50,000
designated toward infrastrucnire improvements (stormwater drainage projects); and
approving a budget adjustment to reflect the $1(X),0(X) expenditure in the General Fund,
and the $100,000 revenue increase in the PIR Fund.
2.Motion to confirm the designation of $100,(XX) of the General Fund Reserves as a HACA
revenue reduction contingency and $1(X),000 as a contract revenue reduction contingency.
JQL A?
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <»ry
DATE; July 18. 1996
ITEM NO: /S
Department Approval:
Name Dor'thy Hallin
TiUe Citv Clerk
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Licenses
Item Description:
List of Licenses for Council Approval
T
GARBAGE & REFUSE COLLECTOR R & W Roll-Off Service, Inc.
5525 County Road 50
Carver, MN
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve above listed license
...
CITY OP ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
License Year /^ ^ ^
Date Received ?-/*'-
Fee Paid (:C. cX- Initials
GARBAGE t REFO^ COLLECTOR’S LICENSE APPLICATION
The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and
herewith makes application for a license to do so.
Business/Finn ^ & W Roll-Off Sorvirr*, Tn,- _ _
Address_ _ _ _ County Rd. 50. fnrv^r -55313- - --
- -(Street) (City) estate)
Business Phone Number 448-7833_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __
(Zip Code)
Applicant's Name Wendy Leistiko
Address Same as above
(Street)
Phone Number _ _ _/, /, o 1 5 3
(City)
Check One:Individual Partnership
Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono -»
Description of Vehicles (attached list if more):
Loaded Loaded
__ 9year
(State) (2ip Cede)
Corporation
1980
4-9il0
n I. ^ i •
Mack
^ ^ r*w.
46,000 34.000 _J_Q__tjii__4Il_-Yds- -
Ym9301I
Mack 46,000 34.000 10 AL_yH<!- -- -ym79778-
0
General area of City served ai i
Schedule of Collection charges/ dates amount and type of wasi.fi.
Approximate number of customers in Orono —rQsidential-t—conatruttion vary
Hennepin Xo., ^el(-8oS^^^uFnsvilfe^§ai^itarv_ _ _ _Location of dumping area
IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATI<SVfW>te#!UST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING;
Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of
$100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee xs a
$30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if *
I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees
and taxes required by law. The above information is <^rrect.
^// _ _ _ _ _ _
Applicaq^ ' ' ' Da*’-''
FOR CITY OSB ONLY
X_ _ Approval
After review of application, staff recommends;
Denial Other (specify)
(7^At
'—>• _ ^ ^ ^ 4^ A ^1* a
1-ff'
Signature of City Official Date
OtTYop
isse
»>ONo
IS Jul 199€
1^0 3:2J m
Check Regiiter
City of Orono
Chec^
Number Oete liame
Check Ikinber
SI864
S1664 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
17-Jul-96 CITY COOSTY CREDIT UNION
Totelfl C3ieck Number 51864 CITY COUNTY CREDIT milON
Check Number 51865 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
51B6S
S186S
5186S
17-Jul-96
17-Jul-96
l7-Jul-96
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Totals Check Number 51865 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Check Number 51866 GREAT NEST LIFE ASSURANv.^ CO.
51966 17-Jul-96 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
Totals Check Number 51866 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
Check Number 51867 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
51867 17-Jul*96 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
Totals Check Number 51867 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
Check Number 51868 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
51868 17-Jul-96 HENNEPIN COUT.TY SUPPORT i COLL
Totals Check Number 51868 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & COLL
Check Number 51869 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
51869 17-Jul-96 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Totals Check Number 51869 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Check Number 51870 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
51870 17-JU1-96 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Totals Check Nu ber 51870 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Check Number 51871 MN DEPT OP REVENUE
51871 17-Jul-96 MN DEPT OF RE'/ENUE
Totals Check Number 51871 MN DEPT OF REvENUE
Check Number 51872 KN MUTUAL LIFE
51872 17-Jul-96 mi MUTUAL LIFE
Totals Check Number 51872 MN MUTUAL MFE
Transaction
Amount
5.744.00
5.744.00
3.076.21
3.076.21
7.598.73
13.751.15
1.190.00
1.190.00
164.82
164.82
184.50
184.50
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
3.154.91
3.154.91
55.00
55.00
Page 1
Coamencs
SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED
FICA 4 MEDICARE W/H
FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING
DEFERRED COMP W/H
THOMTON 8C0266780
SKREE'’ SC0262310
DEFERRED COMP W/H
UNION DUBS W/H
STATE TAX W/H
DEFERRED COMP W/H
IS Jul 1996
Mon 3:23 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
ITuBd^r Cate Name
Qleck Humber
51873
51873 HS STATS RETIREMENT-DEF CCH?
17-JU1-96 MN STATE RETIRiMENT-DEf COMP
Totals Check Kjiaber 51873 MN STATE RE71Rr?SNT-DEF CCHP
Check Number 51874 PEBSCO/OBRA
-1874 17-Jul-96 PEBSCO/OBRA
Totals Check Number 51874 PEBSCO/OBRA
Check Number 51875 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
51875 17-JU1-96 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
Totals Check Number 51875 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
Check Number 51876 PERA
51876
51876
i7.Jul-96
17-Tul-96
PERA
PERA
Totals *">eck Number 51876 PERA
Check Number 51877 ST. CROIX COUNTY
51877 17-Jul-96 ST. CROIX COUNTY
Totals Check Number 51877 ST. CROIX COUNTY
Qieck Number 51878 UNITED NAY
518'»8 17-JU1-96 UNITED WAY
Totals Check Hvunber 51078 UNITED WAY
Grand Total
Transaction
Amount
150.00
150.00
238.27
238.27
1.792.50
1.792.50
3.891.56
5.120.59
9.012.15
74.83
74.83
29.00
29.00
35.641.13
Page 2
Comments
DEFERRED COMP N/H
OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H
USCM DEFERRED COMO ||/H
PERA EMPLOYES W/H
PERA CITY SHARE
CHILD SUPPORT-SCHULTZ
3iARm DONATIONS W/H
■ f »- t r* 1
18 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 1
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
51879
51879 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
11-Jul-96 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Totals Check Number 51879 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Check Number 51880 ALBINSON
51880 ll-Jul-96 ALBINSON
Totals Check Number 51880 ALBINSON
Check Number 51881 ALL STAR ELECTRIC
51881
51881
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
ALL STAR ELECTRIC
ALL STAR ELECTRIC
Totals Check Number 51881 ALL STAR ELECTRIC
Check Number 51892 AMEM
51892 ll-Jul-96 AMEM
Totals Check Number 51882 AMEM
Check Number 51883 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
Totals Check Number 51883 AMERICAN NATIONAL BATiK
Cht?ck Number 51884 AT&T
51884 ll-Jul-96 AT&T
To^.als Check Number 51884 AT&T
Check Number 51985 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
51885
51885
16-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
AUGIE-; MOBILE CHEF
AT.’C >::* .E CHEF
Totals Check Number 51895 AUGTE5 .‘lObxLE CHEF
Check Number 51885 BLACKOWIAK & SON
51886
51886
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
BLACKOWIAK & SON
BLACKOWIAK & SON
Transaction
Amount
412.43
412.43
144.31
144.31
276.31
491.00
767.31
80.00
80.00
180,582.24
10.60
10.60
60.78
54.80
115.58
70.89
290.77
Comments
CELL PHONE-CHESWICK
MEASLIUNG WHEEL
REPLACE PD GARAGE LIGHTS
ELEC WORK • L.S.
TCMCHECK-AMEM CONFERENCE
51883 17-Jul-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 18,491.29 INT DUE 1995 BONDS
51883 17-JU1-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 18,932.89 INT DUE 1995 BONDS
51883 17-Jul-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 8,647.01 INT DUE 1995 BONDS
51883 17-Cul-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 42,887.50 INT DUE 1992 BONDS
51883 17-Jul-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 91,623.55 HRA DEBT INT DUE 7/15/96
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES
SANDWICHES FOR RESALE
SANDWICHES FOR RESALE
GOLF COURSE
PARKS
18 Jul 1998
Thu 12:13 PM
Check
Nurnber Date Name
Check Register
City of Crono
Transact ion
Amount Comments
Page 2
Check Number
S1888
51886 BLACKOWIAK & SON
11-Jul-96 BLACKOWIAK k SON
Totals Check Number 51086 BLACKOWIAK k SON
168.58
530.24
CITY OFFICES
Check Number 51887 BLACKOWIAK k SON
51887 ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
BLACKOWIAK k SON
51987 BLACKOWIAK k SON
521.70
521.70
JL7IK CLEANUP
Check Number 51888 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
51888
51888
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
BROCK WHITE COMPANY
BROCK WHITE COMPANY
51998 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
286.33
286.33
572.66
STABILYZER FABRIC
STABILY2ER FABRIC
Check N'jmber 51889 BUDGET PRINTING
51889
51889
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Nun^er
BUDGET PRINTING
BUDGET PRINTING
51899 BLTGET PRINTING
98.02
8.58
106.60
INSPECTION NOTICES
FORMS
Check Number
51890
51890 CARGILL SALT DIVISION
16-JU1-96
Totals Check Number
CARGILL SALT DIVISION
51890 CARGILL SALT DIVISION
1.162.11
1.162.11
COARSE SALT
Check Number
51891
51891 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS
16-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS
51091 CDP IMAGING SYSTE!^
189.88
189.88
COPIER LEASE-JULY
Check Number
51892
51892
51892
51892
51892 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
16-Jul-96
16-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
16-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
51892 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
279.09
66.33
228.73
27.90
622.C5
#174 REPL. SHOCKS
#176 OIL CHANGE. TIRE BAL
#167 BRAKES
#172 REPL. FUEL FILTER
Check Number
51893
51893 CITY OF LONG LAKE
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
CITY OF LONG LAKE
51893 CITY OF LONG LAKE
23.043.50
23.043.50
3RD QTR FIRE PROTECTION
Check Number 51894 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING
51894 ll-Jul-96 CITYVirw PLUMBING k HEATING 86.83 REPLACE FLUSH VALVES
18 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
5X894 CITYVIEW PLUMBING 4 HEATING
Totals Check Number 51094 CITYVIEW PLUMBING 4 HEATING
Check Number
51895
51095 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
51095 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
Check Number
51896
51896 CON-MIX
ll-Jul-96 CON-MIX
Totals Check Number 51096 CON-MIX
Check Number
51097
51097 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC.
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC.
51097 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC
Check Number
51898
51098 CYS UNIFORMS
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
CYS UNIFORMS
51890 CYS L7JIF0RMS
Check Number
51899
51099 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
51999 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
Check Number
51900
51900 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
17-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
51900 DEPT OF ADMINISTP-A/ION
Check Number
51901
51901
519C1 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC.
16-JU1-96
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC
EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC,
51901 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC,
Check Number
51902
51902 EAST SIDE BEVEPJVGE
ll-Jul-96
Totals Check Number
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
5x902 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Transact ion
Amount
86.88
071.23
071.23
297.55
297.55
154.40
154.40
113.90
113.90
64.00
64.00
235.90
235.90
512.46
059.77
1.371.23
227.00
227.00
Page 3
Comments
JULY INSURANCE
CONCRETE FOR G.S. 5.6
REPAIR L.S. 84
KARNITZ-PANTS
BEER FOR RESALE
MICROFICHE PERMITS
STREET SIGNS
CITY LOGO SIGNS
BEER FOR RESALE
Check Number 51903 ERICKSON CHEV-PONTIAC. INC
18 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check
NuTT±)er
Check Number
51903
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 4
Date Name
51903 ERICKSON CHE"/-PONT I AC. INC
11-Jul-96 ERICKSON CHEV-PONTIAC. INC
Totals Check Number 519C3 ERICKSON CHEV-PONTIAC. INC
Check Number 51904 ESI COMMUNICATIONS
51904
51904
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jui-96
ESI C'OWUNICATIONS
ESI COMMUNICATIONS
Totals Check Number 51904 ESI COMMUNICATIONS
Check Number 51905 FEED RITE CONTROLS
51905 ll-Jul-96 FEED RITE CONTROLS
Totali Check Number 51905 FEED RITE CONTROLS
Check Number
51908
51908
51908
51903 GENUINE PARTS CO.
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
GENUINE FARTS CO,
GENUINE PARTS CO.
GENUINE PARTS CO,
Totals Check Number 51908 GEinJIJIE PARTS CO.
Check Number 51909 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
51909 ll-Jul-96 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
Totals Check Number 51909 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
Check Number
51910
51910 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
16-Jul-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC,
Transaction
Amount
22.840.00
22.840.00
74.00
118.00
192.00
10.00
10.00
66.22
47.95
34.29
146.46
1.200.00
1.200.00
40.25
Comments
1996 CHEV 1 TON
REPROGRAM LINE
REPAIR EXT #126
CONTAINER CHARGE
Check Nuftber
51907
51907 G &
ll-Jul-96
K SERVICES
G fc K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN
51907 ll-Jul-96 G &K SERVICES 50.27 STREET EMPLOYEES
51907 ll-Jul-96 G &K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN
51907 16-Jul-96 G
k K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS
51907 17-Jul-96 G &K SERVICES 58.34 FLOOR MATS
51907 16-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 71.58 STREET EMPLOYEES
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 48.24 STREET EMPLOYEES
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 82.57 FLOOR MATS
51907 ll-Jul-96 G k K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN
Totals Check Number 51907 G k K SERVICES 450.21
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
GOLF CAR RENTAL
JUNE CALLS
-^1 r
19 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check Register
City of Orcno
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
51910
51910 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
16-Jul-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
Totals Check Number 51910 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC,
Check Number 51911 HEALTHFARTNERS
51911
51911
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
HEALTHFARTNERS
HEALTHFARTNERS
Totals Check Nurr^tr 51911 HEALTHFARTNERS
Check Number 51912 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
51912 ll-Jul-96 HEN -.PIN COUNTY TRKASURIIR
Totals Check Nun^er 51912 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Check Number 51913 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
51913 ll-Jul-96 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
Totals Check Number 51913 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
Check Number 51914 INFRATECH
51914 ll-Jul-96 INFRATECH
Totals Check Number 51914 INFRATECH
Check Number 51915 JIM HATCH SALES CO.
51915 ll-Jul-96 JIM HATCH SALES CO
Totals Check Number 51915 JIM HATCH SALES CO
Check Number 51916 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO
51916 ll-Jul-96 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO
Totals Check Number 51916 K0EKNE!i*S AMOCO
Check Number 51917 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
51917 ll-Jul-96 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
Totals Check Number 51917 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
Check Number 5191B LAWN DETAILERS INC.
51918 16-Jul-96 LAWN DETAILERS INC.
Totals Check Number 51918 lawn DETAILERS INC,
Transaction
Amount
40.25
80.50
313.50
2,671.06
2.984.56
794.00
794.00
34.95
34.95
240.00
240.00
400.48
400.48
116.37
116.37
57.63
57.63
2.145.22
2.145.22
Page 5
Comments
JUNE CALLS
AUGUST HEALTH INSURANCE
AUGUST HEALTH INSURANCE
ROOM k BOARD - KAY
HUBCAPS
TELEVISE CHEVY CHASE AREA
BROOM REPLACEMENT
GAS PURCHASES
MISC SUPPLIES
JUNE BILLING
II Jul X9H
Thu 12:13 PM
Cneck
Number
Check Number
51919
51919
51919
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
51919 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
16-Jul-96 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
ll-Jul-96 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIP*MENT
ll-Jul-96 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Total* Check Number 51919 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Check Number
51920
51920 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
ll-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
51920 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
Check Number
51921
51921
51921
51921 MIDWEST ASPHALT
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
MIDWEST ASPHALT
MIDWEST ASPHALT
MIDWEST ASPHALT
51921 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Transaction
Amount
47.50
145.34
79.86
272.70
345.86
345 86
144.42
144 42
2.406.90
2.695.74
Page 6
Comments
REPAIR SEAL ON MOTOR
REPAIR WEED WHIP
REPLACE IGNITION WIRE
KNr/ES FOR TIGER FLAIL
HAND PATCH
HAND PATCH
HAND PATCH
Check jramber 51922 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
51922
51922
l6-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
Total* Check Nus^r
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
51922 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
146.50
343 45
489.95
POP FOR RESALE
POP FOR RESALE
Check Nun^r 51923 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
51923
51923
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
MirCiEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
MIN*NEA?OLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
51923 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
13.50
45.00
58.50
MEDICAL OXYGEN
ACETYLENE
I Check Number 51924 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC.
51924 ll-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
MN CCUiriY ATTORNEYS ASSOC
51924 MN COUNTY ATTOPuNEYS ASSOC,
144.09
144.09
MISC MATERIALS
Check Number 51925 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN
51925 16-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN
51925 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN
160.00
160.00
MILLER-l^GFOA CONFERENCE
Check Number 51926 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
51926 l6-Jul-96
Total* Check Number
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
51926 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
23.00
23.00
OBERAIGNER-WASTEWATER OP
Check Number 51927 MN STATE TREASURER
18 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check Regiiter
City of Orono
Page 7
Check Number 51933 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
51933 17-Jul-96 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Total* Check Number 51933 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Check Number 51934 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COm.
51934 ll-Jul-96 NORTHLAND BUSINESS CO^W.
Total* Check Number 51934 NORTHLAND BUSINESS C0M^5.
Check Number 51935 NSP
17-Jul-96 NSP51935
Check Transacticn
Number Date Name Amount Comment a
Check Number 51927 MN STATE TREASURER
51927 17-JU1-96 MN STATE TREASURER 2,053.96 JUNE BLDG PERMIT
Total* Check Number 51927 MN STATE TREASURER 2.053.96
Check Number 51929 MOU^fD MEDICAL CLINIC
51928 ll-Jul-96 MOUND MEDICAL CLINIC 38.00 DEBAERE-PHYSICAL
Total* Check Number 51928 MOUND MEDICAL CLINIC 38.00
Check Number 51929 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
51929 ll-Jul-96 MPLS COWUNITY COLLEGE 229.00 BOBZIEN. ^OLL. 1
Total* Check Nuinber 51929 MPLS COWUNITY COLLEGE 220.00
Check Number 51930 MSP COmUNICATIONS
51930 ll-Jul-96 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 194.00 ADVERTISEMENT
Total* Check Number 51930 m? C08f<UNICATIONS 194.00
Check Number 51931 KTI DIST CO.
51931 16-Jul-96 MTI DIST CO.70.29 GROUNDS SUPPLIES
51931 16-Jul-96 MTI DIST CO.66.03 GROUNDS SUPPLIES
Total* Check Number 51931 MTI DIST CO.136.32
Check Number 51932 NAVARRE KARDHARE
51932 ll-Jul-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 20.76 MISC PARTS
51932 ll-Jul-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 237.91 MISC PARTS
51932 ll-Jul-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.40 MISC PARTS
51932 ll-Jul-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 139.87 MISC PARTS
Total* Check Number 51932 NAVARRE HARDWARE 410.94
8.00
8.00
183.21
188.21
2.242.75
LAB TEST
MINI CASSETTE TAPES
STREET LIGHT BILL
.9 Jul 1996
:hu 12:13 yn
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check Number 51942 PUMP & METER SERVICES INC.
51942 ll-Jul-96 PUMP k METER SERVICES INC,
Totals Check Number 51*42 PUMP k METER SERVICES INC,
Check Number 51943 RADISSON ARROWWOOD RESORT
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 51935 NSP
51935 17-JU1-96 NSP 71.30 NSP CHARGES
51935 17-Jul-96 NSP 358.87 NSP CHARGES
Totals Check Number 51935 NSP 2.672.92
Check Number 51936 OFFICE DEPOT
51936 02-JU1-96 OFFICE DEPOT 16.67 MISC SUPPLIES
Totals Check Number 51936 OFFICE DEPOT 16.67
51937 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.
51937 16-JU1-96 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.28.71 CHIPS FOR RESALE
51937 ll-Jul-96 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.16.17 CHIPS FOR RESALE
Totals Check Number 51937 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.44.88
Check Number 51938 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEM^
51938 ll-Jul-96 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS 115.78 PICKUP ROLLER HP4FIN
Totals Check Number 51938 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS 115.78
Check Number 51939 ORONO SELF SERVICE
51939 ll-Jul-96 ORONO SELF SERVICE 16.97 GAS PURCHASE
Totals Check Number 5x939 ORONO SELF SERVICE 16.97
Check Number 51940 PIONEER
51940 lo-Jul-96 PIONEER 134.75 ORD 8148 2ND SERIES
51940 16-JU1-96 PIONEER 96.08 1995 FINANCIAL SUMMARY
51940 16-Jul-96 PIONEER 160.11 1995 FINANCIAL SUMMARY
51940 16-JU1-96 PIONEER 96.08 1995 FINANCIAL SUWARY
51940 lt> Jul-96 PIONEER 288.23 1995 FINA.NCIAL SUMMARY
Totals Check Number 51940 PIONEER 775.25
Check Number 51941 PROLAWNS
51941 ll-Jul-96 PROLAWNS 250.00 SPRAY PARKS
Totals Check Number 51941 PROLAWNS 250.00
45.24
45.24
REPLACE SET SCREW
4
18 Jul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
51943
51943 RADISSON ARROWWOOD RESORT
11-Jul-96 RADISSON AR^OWWOOD RESORT
Totals Check Number 51943 RADISSON ARROWWOOD RESORT
Check Number 51944 REED VENDING
51944
51944
16-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
REED VENTING
REED VENDING
Totals Check Number 51944 REED VENDING
Check Number 51945 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
51945 16-Jul-96 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
Totals Check Number 51945 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
Check Number 51946 ROLLINS OIL CO.
51946 ll-Jul-96 ROLLINS OIL CO.
Totals Check Number 51946 ROLLINS OIL CO.
Check Nun^r 51947 schoening excavating
51947 ll-Jul-96 SCHOENING EXCAVATING
Totals Check Number 51947 SCHOENING EXCAVATING
Check Number 51948 SNYDER DRUG STORES
Check Number
51949
51949 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
16-Jul-96 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
Totals Check Number 51949 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
Check Number 51950 STREICHERS
51950 ll-Jul-96 STREICHERS
Totals Check Number 51950 STREICHERS
Check Number 51951 TOP SQUADS
51951 16-Jul-96 TOP SQUADS
Transaction
Amount
'74.76
174.76
90.70
129 00
213.70
6,525.91
6,525.91
2,850.83
2,850.83
832.00
892.00
45.00
45.00
7.61
7.61
Page 9
Comments
MILLER. KUEHN-MNGFOA CONF
CANDY FOR RESALE
CANDY FOR RESALE
AUGUST FES
UNLEADED GAS
TRUCK RENTAL
51948 17-Jul-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 25.31 BATTERIES. PHOTOS
51948 16-JU1-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 4.98 FILM DEVELOPING
51948 ll-Jul-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 10.72 FILM PROCESSING
51948 ll-Jul-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 14.89 MEMOREX TAPES
51948 ll-Jul-96 SNYDER DRUG STORES 72.81 POLAROID FILM
Totals Check Number 51948 SNYDER DRUG STORES 128.71
EXTRACT BROKEN KEY
RED FILTER
■K
78.63 8172 REPAIR SIREN WIRING
19 Oul 1996
Thu 12:13 PM
Check Regiiter
City of Orono
Check
Kunber Date Name
Check Huniber 51951 TOP SQUADS
Totals Check Number 51951 TOP SQUADS
Check Number 51952 TOWN k COUNTRY
51952 ll-Jul-96 TOWN k COUNTRY
Totals Check Number 51952 TOWN li COUNTRY
Check Number 51953 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
51953
51953
ll-Jul-96
ll-Jul-96
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Totals Check Number 51953 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Check Number 51954 US WEST CC3«LTIICATICNS
31954
51954
51954
17-JU1-96
17-Jul-96
17-JU1-96
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Totals Check Number 51954 US WEST COJ^^’ICATIONS
Check Number 51955 VILLAGE CHEV’ROLET
51955 ll-Jul-96 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
Totals Check Number 51955 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
Check Number 51956 WARNING LITES OF MN
51956 ll-Jul-96 WARNING LITES OF MN
Totals Check Number 51956 WARNING LITES OF MN
Check Number 51957 WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH
51957 17-Jul-96 WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH
Totals Check Number 51957 WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH
Check Number 51958 YOCL’M OIL CO INC.
51958 ll-Jul-96 YOCUM OIL CO INC
Totals Check Number 51958 YOCL’M OIL CO INC
Grand Total
Transaction
Amount
78.63
129.62
129.62
212.99
10.54
223.53
13.31
110.79
66.56
190.66
35.66
35.66
95.85
95.85
156.02
156.02
1.463.50
1.468.50
268.567.65
Conffiients
TRASH LINERS
MISC. UNIFORMS
GOLD STARS
US WEST CHARGES
US WEST CHARGES
US WEST CHARGES
HOSE. COUPLING
LIGHT RENTAL
Page 10
CAR WASH TICKETS
DIESEL FUEL
vl'
INFORMATION
i
ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
CX)UNCa. MEETMQ
J u L ^2 1996
OF
CITYOFORQNO
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE
JOINT COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION
''OTICE, is hereby given that the Council and Park Commission will meet in a joint
work S' • >ion Tuesday, July 30, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley
Parkway, Orono, Minnesota. The purpose of this work session is to discuss the Parks Master
Plan.
This meeting is open to the public.
/s/ Dorothy M. Hallin
City Clerk
Posted at:
City Hall
Crystal Bay Post Office
Navarre Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
( ^
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Julv 19, 1996
SUBJECT: Community Policing Effort for Long Lake’s Dexter Drive Neighborhood
The Orono Police Department is working with the city of Long Lake to plan a community
policing effort to address problems related to the Dexter Drive neighborhood, an area of multi
family housing in Long Lake. The neighborhood is experiencing and generating problems
ranging from child abuse to vandalism. The solutions to these problems require efforts and
resources beyond simply continuing to respond to incidents. They require bringing together a
broad range of stakeholders and resources to identify problems, needs, and solutions and the
resources required to meet the needs and provide solutions. The community policing effort will
attempt to bring together the residents of the area, the city of Long Lake, Hennepin County
Social Services, the resident managers and property managers of the multi-family housing,
representatives of St. Georges Church, representatives of the School District, and any other
stakeholders or resources that are identified in the process.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Ron Moorse, City Administrator h/C
August 19, 1996
ri
SUBJECT: Joint Livable Communities Act Grant Application with the City of Long Lake
The Orono Police Department is currently working with the city of Long Lake to address
problems related to the Dexter Drive area. This area includes some multi-family housing that
is in need of substantial rehabilitation. The city of Long Lake has suggested that part of the
overall solution to the problems of the neighborhood is to rehab the multi-family housing units.
They are proposing that the city of Orono join with the city of Long Lake in a joint grant
application through tte Livable Communities Act to obtain funding for the rehabilitation. This
joint effort would fit in well with the city ’s housing action plan in which Orono indicates it will
cooperate with neighboring cities to fulfill area wide housing needs. Please call me witii
questions or comments regarding the joint grant application.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ /, j
/ '
July 19, 1996
SUBJECT: Saga Hill Park Access and the Valek Property
When the city initially discussed the acquisition of the 9.5 acre tax forfeit parcel in the Saga Hill
area, the city indicated it would need to maintain access to that parcel through the Valek
property which has an existing 10 foot easement that provides access to the property. The
Valek’s requested that they be allowed to acquire 1/2 acre of the 9.5 acre tax forfeit parcel, and
indicated they would consider providing an access easement to the property.
The Valek’s have now indicated they will not agree to moving or expanding the existing
easement on their property, and they do not want access to the park land through their property.
The reason they do not want to move the easement to the west edge of their lot is that they want
to create a new lot by combining their .45 acre lot with the neighbors (Palmers) .42 acre lot.
They have indicated that a sewer assessment has been paid for the proposed additional lot.
The Valek’s have questioned why the city is focusing on their property for a park access versus
looking at all the other properties adjacent to the park land for possible access.
There may be other alternative locations for an access to the park area, but each its own
problems. One option that may be feasible is to use the existing Garden Lane right-of-way. The
obstacle to using this as the access to the tax forfeit parcel is that it does not access the tax
forfeit parcel except at the far north end. However, it could work if the city were to obtain
authority from the DNR to construct a vehicular access through the southern most portion of the
property that was acquired with the DNR grant. This access could serve both the tax forfeit
parcel and the adjacent park land.
Negotiations are continuing with the Fairview Covenant Church regarding an access easement
to the tax forfeit parcel. The church representatives have proposed that the easement be for
pedestrian access only. They have also proposed some limitations related to the permanency of
the t ement.
Gale & Janet Putnam ^ \m'>
1365 Tonkawa Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
July 10, 1996
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
Re: DNR BOAT LAUNCH SITE ON TONKAWA AND CO ROAD 51
We live on Tonkawa Road directly across the street from the DNR boat launch site that is being
developed. This past weekend Gale was talking to our next door neighbor, who asked him why
we had not been at the meetings regarding the boat launch? Gale said what meetings, and how
did you know when they were? Our neighbor informed him that the> had received letters
informing them of the meetings. Today Gale called the DNR to find out what was going on and
to ask why we had not been kept informed. They told him that the City of Orono had supplied
them with a list of the residents affected by this site. WE WERE NOT ON THE LIST, We have
lived in our house and been taxpayers since 1977. Naturally we are furious. This site is going to
greatly diminish the value of our property and our enjoyment of it. The DNR has not considered
screening our property from the site. They have designed the site so that the entrance will be
almost directly across from our driveway.
When we first heard that the DNR was purchasing the old Gayle's Marina Site, we heard that the
number of parking stops for boats w as going to be minimal. We also heard that streets in our
neighborhood would be posted with no-parking signs. The no-parking signs did go up, but the
Orono Police Department does not enforce the ban unless residents call to complain. The old gas
station site does have signs that say no trespassing, but the Police Department is not enforcing
the no trespassing signs either. On weekends the lot is full of vehicles and trailers and has
become an unkept eyesore. This week, the DNR installed some additional no parking signs in
the middle of the driveways at the old gas station site. Without fencing, these signs will not stop
people from parking on the lot. It appears that our Orono Police Department has no intention of
patrolling this area and enforcing the parking ban.
We would appreciate an explanation of why we were not included on the list given to the DNR.
We would also like to know' why the City of Orono has chosen to disregard the impact of this site
on residents who will live next to it?
Sincerely
iwiet & Gale Putnam
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date:July 15, 1996
Subject:Letter from Janet & Gale Putnam
Attachments:1. Mailing list, Nov. 20,1995 Public Information Meeting
2. Certificate of mailing
3. Notice
4. Plat Map
Mr. Putnam's statement that he was not on the mailing list is not true. He was on the mailing list
(Attachment 1) and the address listed is correct. Further, the file contains only only one notice from
this mailing returned by the post office, for a property at 980 Tonkawa Road. These were mailed
first class, hence would have been returned if not delivered. It is our policy to keep in the file those
items returned by the P.O. 1 would therefore conclude that Mr. Putnam was properly notified of this
meeting.
property Owners List for Application #2085
09-117-23 24 0001
Henn Co Park Reserve
Rte 1, Box 296
Maple Plain, MN 55359
09-117-23 32 0017
Duane Brodersen
3060 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 32 0007
David fit Pennie Pomije
3120 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 32 0010
F & M Pacovsky
3186 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-118-23 41 0004/5/6
North Shore Marina Inc.
3222 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 41 0008
Stephen fit Beth Brown
3262 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 44 0011
Joseph fit Mary Dooling
3220 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 41 0013
Mrs. Ida Kane
3332 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 43 0018
Ambrose fit Alice Kivus
3420 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 13 0006
Richard Engelbretson
1180 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
09-117-23 32 0003
Jack Swenson
3020 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 32 0019
Laurence Reardon
3080 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, KN 55391
09-117-23 32 0008
Ken & Jaye Ann Zullo
3160 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23-41-0001
Lillian Bonander
3200 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-118-23 41 0004/5/6
North Shore Marina Inc
1415 Toledo Ave N
Golden Valley, MN 55422
08-117-23 44 0018
08-117-23 41 0011/10
State Of MN-DNR Tax Spec
1201 East Hwy 2
Grand Rapids, MN 55744
08-117-23 44 0008
F E fit L Churchill
3260 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 43 0016
Kenath & Donna Stein
3400 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 42 0004
Gale L Putnam
1365 Tonkawa Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
/
08-117-23 13 0007
Randy Holland
Eric Sullivan
1160 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
09-117-23 32 0004
James & Rosella DePietro
3048 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 32 0006
Daniel fit Deberah McGlynn
3090 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 32 0009
Paul & Beverly Blomberg
3180 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 41 0002
Barbara Millard
3210 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-118- 23 41 0007
Daniel Torberg
3260 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 44 0019
Metro Waste Control Conun
Mears Park Centre
230 E 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
08-117-23 41 0021/12
08-117-23 44 0005
James Dunn
3324 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 43 0017
Daniel Regan
3410 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 41 0001
Fred Guttormson/
Chic Dwight
1220 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 13 0008
Richard Kyle
1140 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
Propoerty Owners List for Application #2085
08-117-23 13 0009
John & Anne Bendt
1120 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 13 0010/11
Marvin Borman
3300 Norwest Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
08-117-23 13 0020
John & Janet Watson
1070 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 13 0019
Keith & Susan Swart
1060 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 13 0014
Doug & Margaret williams
1020 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 12 0002
David & Marilyn Booth
970 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, M14 55356
08-117-23 13 0013
Robert & Joan Bauman
1040 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 12 0005
Raymond Hoffman
1000 Tonkawa Road
L^ng Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 12 0003/4
William & Lori Cornelius
960 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 13 0015
Robert & Debra Edmunds
1030 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 12 0001
Dr. L & M Dorr
980 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
Ct
03-117-23 21 0006
Bruce Engelsma
990 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 21 0017
Gary Krimmel
960 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 21 0007
Dr. Maland Hurr
930 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 21 0008
Edward & Barbara Eschbach
900 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
08-117-23 21 0009
Robert & Joyce Humboldt
850 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
05-117-23 43 0001
Jerry & Cynthia Gray
880 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
05-117-23 21 0009
Hunt Greene/Jane Piccard
865 Partenwood Road
Long Lake, MN 5jl5C
05-117-23 43 0004/44
0001/02
Fullerton Lumber Co
P.O. Box 30
Minneapolis, MN 55440
05-117-23 44 0003
William & Judith Trubeck
3300 Fox Street
Long Lake, MN 55356
05-117-23 44 0004
Donna Lukis
3250 Fox Street
Long Lake, MN 55356
04-117-23 33 0010
David Maas
P.O. Box 392
Long Lake, MN 55356
04-117-23 33 0011
Alan Sc Susan Carlson
3125 Fox Street
Long Lake, MN 55356
04-117-23 33 0007
Phillip Dabill
3067 Farview Lane
Long Lake, MN 55356
04-117-23 33 0008
Ed Sc Karen Baker
3059 Farview Lane
Long Lake, MN 55356
04-117-23 33 0009
Ronald & Susan Burger
3051 Farview Lane
Long Lake, MN 55356
09-117-23 21 0005/1
Judson & Elizabeth Dayton
825 Old Crystal Bay Rd S
Wayzata, MN 55391
09-117-23 21 0004/6
Leonard Carpenter
15500 Wayzata Blvd
#1020
Wayzata, MN 55391
08-117-23 13 0018
Thomas Smith
1205 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
CERTIFICATE OP MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hea»"ing
concerning the matter of #2085, was mailed to the attached
list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 6th day of November, 1995.
Jamie BosmaBO,
D
CITY OF ORONO
NOTICE
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
MAXWELL BAY PUBLIC WATER ACCESS
The Orono Planning Commission will hold a plan review and public information meeting on
Monday November 20, 1995 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on
the matter of application #2085, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ request for a
Commercial Site Plan Review for the construction of the Maxwell Bay Public Water Access. The
access construction will begin in the Spring of 1996 on the site of the former Gayle's Marina and
adjoining properties. The site is at 3390 North Shore Drive in the northeast quadrant of the
intersection of County Roads 51 and 135. This public information meeting and plan review is
being held at the request of the MNDNR to allow the public the opportunity to review the plan
and provide input on the access construction and landscaping plans, prior to City final approval.
The development of this public water access plan is based upon discussions that the MNDNR has
had with Area residents, the Orono Lake Use Committee and City staff. These meetings have
taken place over the last three years. The MNDNR has incorporated numerous design elements
and changes into the plan which were a direct result of these meetings. The Public Water Access
construction plan is based on a compilation of the City and area residents input and the MNDNR
design requirements. The MNDNR, though not required to receive any local permits or
approvals, looks forward to the review process as a positive step in the continuation of the
development of this Public Water Access.
All persons w ishing to review the plans of the Public Water Access site are welcome to attend and
will be offered the opportunity to offer constructive comments on the construction plans. Written
comments will be accepted through 4:30 p.m. November 20, 1995. A copy of the site plan is
available for public review in the City Offices.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
Michael P. Gaffron
Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
To be published the weeks of November 5 and 12, 1995.i
•
; . .
/
/
• '•0123 i
■4V5:£l^r7S^-\
h f j I
\SL>
■r*
M ^ ____ A' AfS^A-
- /S 3^ '*
)M.A}C6<^fc-L U B Ay VS’x
V
COVT LO: I cov; lot I -2. •> - 4 II in.n *t*
STEPHEN M. KROGNESS
605 No. Stubbs Bay Road
Long Lake, MN 55356 JfJt^
June 19, I996
John R. Gerhardson
City of Orono
P. O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323
Dear Mr. Gerhardson,
I received your letter of June 10th in reply to my letter to you dated May 13,1996
In my letter I made several inquires to which I expected a response. These items
along with other concerns were not addressed by you. Please do so before our
meeting.
The summer is going fast, and the unsightly problem Is not going away. It cannot be
resolved without your response. Please do so soon.
Sincerely,
St^hen M. Krogness
Taxpayer
co: Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council
1
To The Editor:
This letter is in response to the Orono man who wanted parking
tickets rescinded. I think this is absurd! (Does he think he
should have special privileges because he is a lawyer and an ex
council member)? As a hard working tax payer, I appreciate the
Orono police for doing the job that they were hired to do. If you
are illegally parked, no matter how many times you have done it in
the past you will eventually get caught. This man has gotten
caught and can't handle the results. When an event such as this is
held during school or in the summer time, I would think that a no
parking zone should be highly enforced to maintain the safety of
all attending. What if this man's son was injured on the field and
needed emergency services, and the emergency vehicles could not get
through in a timely manner? He v;ould probably be the first person
to take legal action against those illegally parked. But you can't
do this to yourself can you? Why should the Chief of Police have
to question the police officer when he was only doing his job? I
think as adults we all should be responsible for upholding the
laws. I would think that as a lawyer and ex council member, he
above all should know and uphold the laws for the State of
Minnesota. Couldn't he just as well walk across the street and
park in the additional parking?
cc: Chief of Police
:_•) ^n> riaT i C : u
Signed Marilynn L.
Spring Park
Vi-'
\\it
1
JIJL LE wI-LC 'I'F til Cl TIES P.l
NEWS RELEASE
Mayor Norm Coleman
390 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Contact;
MEDIA ADVISORY
FAVL ADEL>^ \NN
ConunimiculioiL^ Director
266-8534 (pager 539-6748)
WHAT: MA.TOR ANNOUNCEMEN1 REGARDING
"AiMERICA’S SMITHSONIAN" EXHIBIT
WHEN: 11 A.M. FRIDAY, JULY 19, 1996
WHERE; SAINT PAUL CIVIC CENTER- OUTSIDE
7TH STREET ENTRANCE(near Kellogg blvd)
A major announcenic^nt will be made regarding Saint Paul s bid lo host
"America's Smithsonian," the largest museum exhibit ever put on the road,
which is expected to draw nearly a million spectators by the time it leaves
Providence, Rhode Island in September. The two-year tour has previously
visited Los Angeles, Kansas City, New York and will move to Providence
^The announcement will take place outside the Saint Paul Civic Center.
A media staging area will be set up outside the 7th street side imtrance.
Mayor Norm Coleman, Governor Arne Carlson, and Congressman
Bruce Ve'nto will preside over the announcement. For more intormation,
contact Erich Mische at 266-8519 or pager ^29-1947.
-0-
NOTE:Please fonvard this infonnation to your mayor and council.
P,1-i
enter.
;sman
ion,
PERMrrS ISSUH5/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN BPRMTISS-1 OG/28/96PERMIT TYPEBuilding SGL FAMILY-NEW DUPLEX-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/REMODEL DEMOINST-ADD/REMODEL SF-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total
Mechanical
HEATING SYSTEMS
AIR CONDITIONING
WOOD STOVE/FLUE
FIREPLACE
VENTILATION
GAS LINE INSPECT
DUCT WORK ONLY
REMOVE OIL TANK
UNDEFINED
Sub-total
Plumbing
FIXTURES
WATER METER
UNDEFINED
Sub-total
Sewer k Water
SEWER CONNECTION
NEW SEPTIC SYSTE
DRNFLD fit/OR TANK
SAC ONLY
SEWER DISCONNECT
SEWER fit WATER
Sub-total
Sign
PERMANENT/POSTED
PER./free STANDG
TEMPORARY
Sub-total
Fire
FIREWORKS
PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 06/30/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 06/30/95QTYBASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW1632,659.75 5,308,721.00 21,228.80 16 24.619.85 4,830,278.00 16,001.561112.25 5,259.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.0014032,438.00 2,703,080.00 16,111.89 114 28,997.25 3,474,810.00 16,091.62121,503.75 91,615.00 915.21 15 2,682.50 336,900,00 1,689.023290.00 0.00 0.00 7 380.00 0.00 0.0041,551.75 162,026.00 334.43 7 2,420.50 382,542.00 111.15180.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 56.75 1,800.00 36.8900.00 0.00 0.00 1 72.00 5,000.00 46.8000.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 550,000.00 1,423.1800.00 0.00 0.00 3 90.00 0.00 0.0091,109.25 61,756.00 623.84 4 811.50 52,225.00 527.48186*69,744.75*8,332,457.00*39,214.17*170*60,160.35*9,633,555.00*35,927.70*
55 5,503.50 430,095.82 0.00 31 2,559.32 192,601.00 0.00
13 589.90 40,272.00 0.00 4 220.00 14,000.00 0.00
1 35.00 1,100.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
34 1,456.25 86,450.00 0.00 23 1,123.75 68,324.00 0.00
5 175.00 5,375.00 0.00 2 105.63 6,850.00 0.00
2 70.00 1,000.00 0.00 2 70.00 600.00 0.00
8 322.94 14,125.00 0.00 8 280.00 7,065.00 0.00
6 227.50 8,850.00 0.00 5 175.00 5,450.00 0.00
0 0.00 C .00 0,00 1 247.50 19,800.00 0.00
124*8,380.09*587,267.82*0.00*76*4,781.20* 314,690.00*0.00*
76 5,444.87 349,234.88 0.00 57 4,391.53 306,411.79 0.00
3 473.00 250.00 0.00 2 314.00 0.00 0.00
2 70.00 800.00 0.00 1 35.00 400.00 0.00
81*5,987.87*350,284.88*0.00*60*4,740.53*306,811.79*0.00*
5 175.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00
16 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 13 1,300.00 0.00 0.00
1 50.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00
5 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 140.00 0.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00
30*5,650.00*0.00* 0.00*18*1,540.00*0.00*0.00*
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,500.00 0.00
1 29.25 800.00 0.00 1 35.00 400.00 0.00
1 30.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00
2*59.25*800.00*0.00*3*100.00*1,900.00*0.00*
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00 0.00 0.00
Powrrs ISSUED/FEES C0LLE3CTED YEAR-TO-DftTE IREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 06/20/96 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 2REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 06/30/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 06/30/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWSub-total 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*3*150.00*0.00*0.00*User DefinedLAND ALTERATION 9 525.00 0.00 0.00 11 500.00 3,000.00 0.00TREE REMOVAL 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.00RETAINING WALLS 3 103.00 9,290.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00DOCKS260.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00LAWN SPRINKLER 4 140.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 22*1,028.00*9,290.00*0.00*19*905.00*3,000.00*0.00*Grand-total 445**90,049.96**9,200,099.70**39,214.17**349**72,377.00**10,259,956.79**35,927.70**
PEFMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 06/28/96 YEAR-TO-DATEBASE FEE PLAN REVIEW
SURCHARGE
Lie. SEARCH FEE
SAC
INVESTIGATION
DEPOSIT
BUILDING 69,744.75 39,214.17
4,171.16
0.00
2,650.00
723.50
0.00
MAIL IN
SEWER CONNECTION
ADDL SAC
MAIL IN FEE
MOIL IN
1,355.00
ESCROW
PERMIT TOTAL
0.00
117,858.58
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 06/28/96
REPORT TOTAL
BASE FEE 90,849.96
PLAN REVIEW 39,214.17
SURCHARGE 4,669.18
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00
SAC 2,650.00
INVESTIGATION 723.50
DEPOSIT 0.00
MAIL IN
SEWER CONNECTION
ADDL SAC
MAIL IN FEE
MQIL IN
133.67
1,355.00
50.00
1.50
3.00
ESCROW 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 139,649.98
PERMIT FEE REPORTCITY OF FROM 0l/01/96 ORONOTO 06/30/96MECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER 6 WATER8,300.09 5,987.87 5,650.000.00 0.00 0.00
296.41 184.98 12.50
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
66.38 45.79 1.50
3.00 1.50
50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0,765.88 6,220.14 5,714.00
• * * • *PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/96 TO 06/30/96
* • • * *
USER1,028.00 0.00
4.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,032.13
PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLESIGN59.250.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FIRE0.000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
59.25
0.00
0.00 {
i
PAGE: 2
REQUESTER: CAROLE
ZONING PERMITS ISSUm/FEES CX)LLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN BPRMTISS-106/20/96 • PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 06/30/96PERMIT TYPE QTY -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 06/30/95BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEEUser Defined SUBDIVISION
VARIANCE
CUP
SKETCH PLAN
VARIANCE/CUP
VACATION
APPEAL
Sub-total
629
6
2
1
3
0
4 9#
5,145.^0
6,650
2,200
500
75
600.00
0.00
15,170.00*
00
00
00
00
Grand-total 49t«15,170.00**
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 06/20/96
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASE FEE 15,170.00 15,170.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 15,170.00 15,170.00
0.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 10.00*0.00*5U*
0.00**0.00**50**
3.375.00
5.600.00
1.875.00
800
675
0
100
00
00
00
00
12,425.00*
12,425.00**
** PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OP ORONO
FROM 01/01/96 TO 06/30/96
* * ♦ t •
VALUATION PLAN REVIEW0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0.00**
0.00*
0.00**
PAGE: _ 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
1996 UZAP OF COmUCT CITIISJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJune July August Ssptciter October Bdvesbsr Occaiber TTO TotalsSpring Park Plan Review 82.87 438.S9 200.36 0.00 576.71 105.30 1,403.83Inspections390.00 120.00 195.00 285.00 135.00 150.00 1,150.00Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00TOTAL497.87 583.59 420.36 310.00 736.71 280.30 2,828.83No. Plan Reviews 0 1 2 0 1 2 6No. Inspections 26 8 13 19 9 10 85
Minnetonka Beach
Plan Review 0.00 772.37 511.55 744.57 308.43 1,480.04 3,816.96
Inspections 135.00 30.00 30.00 75.00 135.00 60.00 465.00
Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00
TOTAL 160.00 827.37 566.55 844.57 468.43 1,565.04 4,431.96
No. Plan Reviews 0 2 2 3 2 4 13
No. Inspections 9 2 2 5 9 4 31
657.87 1,410.96 986.91 1,154.57 1,205.14 1,845.34
7,260.79
PERMITS ISSUBD/FEES CX)LLBCTED JUNE 1996REPORT NBR. BPRMTIi^S-1 DATE OF RUN 06/2 8/9(»PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * # i *PAGE: IREQUESTER: CAROLE-- CURRENT RANGE - 06/01/96 - 06/30/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 06/01/9S - 06/30/95PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEWBuiIdinqSGL FAMILY-NEW 5 9,086.25 1,429,252.00 5,906.05 3 5, 343.85 835,400.00 3,472.13DUPLEX-NEW O 112.2574,809.7?J 5,259.007 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00SF-ADD/REMODEL SO 343,263 .OOj 2.535.98 26 11,688.00 1,511,843.00 6,671.27SF-ACC STRUCTURE 4 632.75 39,865.00 411.29 6 1,098.50 69,000.00 714.02demo/PRINCIPAL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00DEMO-ACCESSORY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00
ACC/GARAGES 3 349.25 19,000.00 227.01 3 574.25 37,000.00 373.27
Sub-total 42*14,990.25*1,836,639.00*9,080.33*41*18,814.60*2,453,243.00*11,230.69*
Mechanical
HEATING SYSTEMS 6 351.25 26,125.00 0.00 3 432.44 34,595.00 0.00
AIR CONDITIONING 3 105.00 5,959.00 0.00 4 220.00 14,000.00 0.00
FIREPLACE 5 175.00 8,650.00 0.00 7 288.75 16,324.00 0.00
VENTILATION 1 35.00 1,695.00 0.00 1 70.63 5,650.00 0.00
GAS LINE INSPECT 1 35.00 600.00 0.00 1 35.00 400.00 0.00
DUCT WORK ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 2,335.00 0.00
REMOVE OIL TANK 1 35.00 800.00 0.00 2 70.00 2,250.00 0.00
Sub-total 17*736.25*43,829.00*0.00*21*1,221.82*75,554.00*0.00*
Plumbinq
FIXTURES S 308.69 20,205.00 0.00 11 877.38 55,226.79 0.00
UNDEFINED 1 35.00 300.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 6*343.69*20,505.00*0.00*11*877.38*55,226.79*0.00*
Sewer & Water
SEWER CONNECTION 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 5 500.00 0.00 0.00 10 1,000.00 0.00 0.00
DRNFLD it/OR TANK 0 0.00 0.00
0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00
SAC ONLY 1 900.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEWER it WATER 2 140.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 10*1,610.00*0.00*0.00*11*1,050.00*0.00*0.00*
Fire
FIREWORKS 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total C*0.00*0.00*0.00*2*100.00*0.00*0.00*•
User Defined
LAND ALTERATION 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 250.00 0.00 0.00
TREE REMOVAL 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
RETAINING WALLS 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAWN SPRINKLER 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 4*130.00*0.00*0.00*8*355.00*0.00*0.00*
Grand-total 79**17,810.19**1,900,973.00**9,080.33**94**22,418.80** 2,584,023.79**
11,230.69*
REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1
DATE OF RUN 06/28/96
USER
PERMIT NUMBER
ADDRESS:USER
BASE PEE
PLAN REVIEW
SURCHARGE
Lie. SEARCH FEE
SAC
INVESTIGATION
DEPOSIT
130.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SEWER CONNECTION
MAIL IN
ESCROW
PERMIT TOTAL
0.00
131.00
* * * * *PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 06/01/96 TO 06/30/96
t « * * *
PEranrs ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED JUNE 1996REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 06/28/96 * t PERMIT FEE CITY OF FROM 06/01/96 REPORT ***** ORONOTO 06/30/96 PAGE:REQUESTER: CAROLEBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER k WATER USER SIGN FIREBASE FEE 14,990.25 736.25 343.69 1,610.00 130.00 0.00 0.00PLAN REVIEW 9,080.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 920.05 22.47 11.05 4.50 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SAC 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 399.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEWER CONNECTION
MAIL IN
1,355.00
12.40 1.50
ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 27,594.88 771.12 356.24 1,614.50 131.00 0.00 0.00
PAGE: 29
REQUESTER: CAROLE
FRI^ JUN 28, .96, 3:S7 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1.TONE 1996ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONSANFORD171,600.00365,000.00CARRINGTON300.000. 00250.000. 00WETT342.652.00100,000.00SHANNON10,000.00PERCIVAL35,000.00STKRNAU4.COO.00GUTTORMSON5,000.00
EARLING 10,000.00
CUSICK 28,300.00
MARTIN 800.00
ANDERSON 2,500.00
KRAUSE 3,200.00
FUCHS 3,600.00
MCCARTNEY 2,880.00
COOPER 1,000.00
PETERSON 5,000.00
HAUSER 400.00
PETERSON 13,000.00
KNIGHT 13,000.00
MARTIN 350.00
SUNDBY 4,153.00
HOWE 5.259.00
BUTTERFIELD 5,500.00
ZWART 100.00
ODEAN 3,200.00
DOLEMAN 3,000.00
PIEPHO 2,500.00
MATTESON 12,000.00
HARNS 3,780.00
SCHIMMEL 500.00
MARESH 16,000.00
GERLICHER 31,000.00
OSBORN 4,000.00
CUMNINGTON 8,500.00
MARKS 35,000.00
HAY 20,000.00
STIPAKOV 1,000.00
ESTERLY 13,465.00
WICKLUND 400.00
DAHL 2,625.00
NELSON
2,000.00
13,000.00
3,000.00
BRADY 1,000.00
GOUNTANIS
2,800.00
2,000.00
HAY 500.00
HASSELOUIST 600.00
PEARSON 1,200.00
42C
ME
01010101010202020304
04
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
09
09
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
24
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
30
30
42C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
24909452600192022551396276027324403315
2165
965
3447
1295
3060
1305
755
3231
1100
2801
1930
425
3447
3587
135
3925
3970
930
1680
770
10
420
1299
2085
1375
360
2300
3535
2855
2020
4765
3700
3286
1540
165
125
420
2505
1098
2055
2250
4345
CASCO POINT RD COX FARM RD THOROUGHBRED LA 6TH AVE N ABINGDON WAY BALDUR PARK RD WHITE OAK CIR CAROLINE AVE NORTH ARM DR CRYSTAL BAY RD
COLIN DR
EDGEWOOD HILLS RP
CRYSTAL BAY RD
LOMA LINDA AVE
NORTH SHORE DR
SPRUCE PL
HUNT FARM RD
CASCO CIR
NORTH SHORE DR W
CASCO POINT RD
WEST FARM RD
TONKAWA RD
CRYSTAL BAY RD
NORTH SHORE DR
CHEVY CHASE DR
WATERTOWN RD
NORTH SHORE DR
DAKOTA AVE
SHADYWOOD RD
NORTH ARM DR
MYRTLEWOOD RD
NORTH ARM DR
WILDHURST TR
6TH AVE N
REST PT RD
ORONO ORCHARD RD S
FOX ST
IVY PL
SOMERSET LA
SALEM CT
WATERTOWN RD
BAYSIDE RD
NAVARRE LA
FOX ST
CRISTOFORI CIR
HACKBERRY HILL
DEBORAH DR
OLD BEACH RD
LOMA LINDA AVE
SOMERSET LA
FRENCH LAKE RD
WATERTOWN RD
96/06/03 OR- 96/06/03 OR- 96/06/20 OR- 96/06/24 OR- 96/06/27 OR- 96/06/04 OR- 96/06/20 OR- 96/06/19 OR- 96/06/24 OR- 96/06/06 OR-
96/06/28 OR-
96/06/05 OR-
96/06/03 OR-
96/06/07 OR-
96/06/13 OR-
96/06/20 OR-
96/06/14 OR-
96/06/19 OR-
96/06/20 OR-
96/06/26 OR-
96/06/25 OR-
96/06/25 OR-
96/06/03 OR-
96/06/24 OR-
96/06/10 OR-
96/06/12 OR-
96/06/12 OR-
96/06/17 OR-
96/06/18 OR-
96/06/25 OR-
96/06/27 OR-
96/06/28 OR-
96/06/13 OR-
96/06/03 OR-
96/06/24 OR-
96/06/14 OR-
96/06/26 OR-
96/06/19 OR-
96/06/20 OR-
96/06/24 OR-
96/06/06 OR-
96/06/17 OR-
96/06/24 OR
96/06/05 OR
96/06/07 OR
96/06/07 OR
96/06/12 OR
96/06/13 OR
96/06/13 OR
96/06/14 OR
96/06/17 OR
96/06/21 OR
007552 000030 008081 000091 008100 008037 008065 008069 008083 007895
008102
000032
000018
000042
008056
000067
008070
000076
008084
008102
008089
000090
000035
007902
000049
008052
00805 >
008073
008074
008097
000105
008107
008060
008031
000039
008063
008068
000077
000080
000093
008024
008034
007695
008040
000043
008044
008051
000055
008058
008062
008072
008088
10941301193414921944949917572926155902511474416500000000147105320000000000000000
00000000
18242153
30000000
00000000
00000000
00000000
00000000
00000000
14725715
00000000
19332255
19332255
00000000
18812241
19333536
15410304
00000000
00000000
15454233
16393931
14733397
15410304
00000000
00000000
17082801
17227129
14747121
14710532
14766768
14700000
15465500
00000000
34701208
35712525
35421166
35378491
34748366
39343602
27531839
35331320
34202026
34791600
BRANDL ANDERSON HOMES INC CLASSIC STRUCTURES INC LECY CONST INC NEDEGAARD CONSTRUCTION CO ElDEN CONSTRUCTION INC WALDENWOODDANBERRY COMPANY
JAMES PATSCH CONST INC
THE CARPENTERS CONST CO
CUSTOM POOLS INC
CUSTOM POOLS INC
JONES LES ROOFING
COTY CONSTRUCTION
WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY
HARTY JOHN INC
CRANDALL EUGENE
PLYMOUTH ROOFING
WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY
AMERICAN DESIGNERSfitBLDERS
GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO
LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS
DANBERRY COMPANY
STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ
SCHERER BUILDING CORP
NEW LEAF BUILDERS
STEINKRAUS PLBG & HTG
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
FLARE HTG 6 AC
SUPERIOR CONTR INC
ABEL/B 6 C INC
FIREPLACE CONSTRUCTION CO
MATTl PLUMBING & HEATING
E E MASONRY INC
PRACTICAL SYSTEMS
COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C
FRI, JUN 28, 199C, 3:57 PMPERMITiJ ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 2JUNE 19%ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONMB
17C
6C
SW
IOC
UD
4C
79C
01010224
24
24
29
17C
01
01
02
02
02
29
6C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
IOC
01
01
13
34
4C
27158028551345
3060
1085
1220
2715
3925
3225
430
2855
320
2660
3700
425
190
2425
2505
425
2320
165
3250
2775
2780
3465
3225
COUNTRYSIDE DR CYGNET PL SOMERSET LA NORTH ARM DR
FARVIEW LA
TONKAWA RD
TONKAWA RD
COUNTRYSIDE DR W
WATERTOWN RD
BOHNS PT LA
BROWN RD S
SOMERSET LA
WOODHILL RD
FOX ST
WATERTOWN RD
TONKAWA RD
CYGNET PL
OLD BEACH RD
OLD BEACH RD
TONKAWA RD
LONGVIEW CIR
CRISTOFORI CIR
FOX ST
COUNTRYSIDE DR W
COUNTRYSIDE DR W
SHORELINE DR
CARMAN RD
96/06/27 OR 96/06/28 OR 96/06/10 OR 96/06/07 OR
96/06/19 OR
96/06/24 OR
96/06/03 OR
008104008108008048008045
008085
008095
008029
96/06/13
96/06/20
96/06/06
96/06/24
96/06/26
96/06/03
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
008054
008086
008041
008094
008101
008028
96/06/07
96/06/07
96/06/24
96/06/13
96/06/19
96/06/19
96/06/21
96/06/26
96/06/26
96/06/26
OR-008046
OR-008047
OR-008050
OR-008057
OR-008070
OR-008079
OR-008087
OR-008092
OR-00809B
OR-008099
96/06/04 OR-000036
96/06/13 OR-008059
96/06/28 OR-008106
96/06/14 OR-008064
15590251347824523941421134432819
39411044
38711491
00000000
24432921
28847104
24738793
29383589
29332521
24340445
54425855
54425855
54734300
24461495
28673703
28673703
00000000
54791762
54791762
54791762
84792585
84792585
00000000
14728733
EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC SCHERBER k SONS INC KLEVE HTG k AC NARKIE HTG k AC INC
CENTRAIRE INC
A-ABC APPLIANCE fit HEATING
SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG
PRAIRIE PLUMBING
CITYVIEW PLBG fit HTG
STANDARD PLBG fit APPL CO
THOMPSON PLBG
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES
SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES
SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE
WIDMER INC
M fit W WATER fit SEWER INC
M fit W WATER fit SEWER INC
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
!^AYES EXCAVATING
GENERAL SERVICE
GENERAL SERVICE
TALL TIMBER TREE EXPERTS
VITKO 2,200.00600.00SHEKELS1.695.003.700.00
HAFSTAD 2,600.00
GARDNER 2,159.00
GUn'ORMSON 1,150.00
BUTTERFIELD
11,395.00
661.00
SWEATT 300.00
BREHM 4,500.00
CONNER
450.00
3,200.00
DANE .00
CRAM .00
KNIGHT .00
HOHRMAN .00
KNIGHT
.00
.00
.00
JONES .00
LESSER .00
LUKIS .00
MARKS .00
SEWARD .00
COX .00
FARNHAM .00
1,900,973.00<
01 Residence 2402Addition2503Garage/Attached 2604Garage/Detached 2705Porch2806Deck2907Fence3008Gazebo31
09 Pool 32
10 Re-side 33
11 Re-roof 34
12 Tennis Court
13 Sign
14 Dock
15 Shed
16 Demo-Principal Structure
17 Demo-Accessory Structure
18 Move
19 Commercial
20 Institutional
21 Storm Damage Repair
22 1-100 Cubic Yards
23 101 Cubic Yards or More
99 Undefined
Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure
Stairway to Lake
Retaining Wall
Entrance Monuments
Tree Removal
LOCAL DSB CODES
9999 ’[indef ined
FRI, JUN 28, -^96. 3:56 PMNUMERICAL LISTING JUNE 19%PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL AUDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY PAGE 1OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONOR-007552OR-007695OR-007895OR-007902OR-008018OR-008024OR-008028OR-008029OR-008030OR-008031OR-008032
OR-008034
OR-008035
OR-008036
OR-008037
OR-008039
OR-008040
OR-008041
OR-008042
OR-008043
OR-008044
OR-008045
OR-008046
OR-008047
OR-008048
OR-008049
OR-008050
OR-008051
OR-008052
OR-008053
OR-008054
OR-008055
OR-008056
OR-008057
OR-008058
OR-008059
OR-008060
OR-008062
OR-008063
OR-008064
OR-008065
OR-008067
OR-008068
OR-008069
OR-008070
OR-008072
OR-008073
OR-008074
OR-008076
OR-008077
OR-008078
OR-008079
OR-008080
OR-008081
96/06/03 N 96/06/24 N 96/06/06 N 96/06/24 N 96/06/03 N 96/06/06 N 96/06/03 N 96/06/03 N 96/06/03 N 96/06/03 N 96/06/05 N
96/06/17 N
96/06/03 N
96/06/04 N
96/06/04 N
96/06/24 N
96/06/05 N
96/06/06 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/07 N
96/06/10 N
96/06/10 N
96/06/24 N
96/06/12 N
96/06/12 N
96/06/12 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/13 N
96/06/14 N
96/06/14 N
96/06/14 N
96/06/20 N
96/06/20 N
96/06/26 N
96/06/19 N
96/06/14 N
96/C6/17 N
96/06/17 N
96/06/18 N
96/06/19 N
96/06/19 N
96/06/19 N
96/06/19 N
96/06/20 N
96/06/20 N
2490 3286 3315 3587 34 4 7 4765 320 1220 945 2085 965
3780
3447
2775
1396
1375
1540
3225
1295
166
125
1345
2660
3780
2855
135
425
420
3925
3970
2715
2585
3860
190
1098
2780
1299
2855
360
3225
2760
1305
2300
2732
755
2250
930
1680
3231
3535
2425
2585
2855
2600
CASCO POINT RD 01 18941301NAVARRE LA 01 34701208CRYSTAL BAY RD 04 00000000NORTH SHORE DR 11 18812241CRYSTA’ BAY RD or.00000000WATERTuWN RD 30 15465500WOODHILL RD 2 9 24340445TONKAWA RD 29 00000000COX FARM RD 01 193414926TH AVE N 29 00000000EDGEWOOD HILLS RD 05 18242153
BAYSIDE RD 30 00000000
CRYSTAL BAY RD 10 00000000
COUNTRYSIDE DP. W 01 84792585
BALDUR PARK RD 02 14744165
REST PT RD 29 17882881
FOX ST 01 35712525
BOHNS PT LA 02 24738793
LOMA LINDA AVE 06 00000000
CRISTOFORI CIR 01 35421166
HACKBERRY HILL 01 35379491
NORTH ARM DR 24 34432819
FOX ST 01 54425855
WATERTOWN RD 01 54425855
SOMERSET LA 02 39414211
CHEVY CHASE DR 11 19333536
TONKAWA RD 01 54734300
DEBORAH DR 01 34748366
WATERTOWN RD 11 15410304
NORTH SHORE DR 11 00000000
COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 24432921
OLD BEACH RD 01 39343602
NORTH SHORE DR 06 00000000
CYGNET PL 01 24461495
LOMA LINDA AVE 01 27531839
COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 84792585
WILDHURST TR 24 00000000
SOMERSET LA 01 35J31328
ORONO ORCHARD RD S 29 17227129
CARMAN RD 34 14728733
WHITE OAK CIR 02 00000000
SPRUCE PL 06 00000000
FOX ST 29 14747121
CAROLINE AVE 02 14710532
HUNT FARM RD 06 00000000
FRENCH LAKE RD 01 34282826
DAKOTA AVE 11 00000000
SHADYWOOD RD 11 15454233
CASCO CIR 06 00000000
IVY PL 29 14710532
OLD BEACH RD 01 28673703
OLD BEACH RD 01 28673703
SOMERSET LA 29 14766768
THOROUGHBRED LA 01 19449499
BRANDL ANDERSON HOMES INC STEINKRAUS PLBG 6 HTGJONES LES ROOFINGNEW LEAF BUILDERS CLEARWATER SYSTEMSCLASSIC STRUCTURES INCJAMES PATSCH CONST INC
GENEPAI SERVICE
WALDENWOOD
AMERICAN DESIGNEPS6BLDERS
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
CITY VIEW PLBG (< HTG
FLARE HTG U AC
SUPERIOR CONTR INC
NARKIE HTG & AC INC
SWEDLUNB SEPTIC SERVICES
SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES
KLEVE HTG 6 AC
COTY CCSTRUCTION
SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE
ABEL/B ii C INC
WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY
SOUTHWEST METRO PLBG
FIREPLACE CONSTRUCTION CO
WIDMER INC
MATTI PLUMBING U HEATING
GENERAL SERVICE
E E MASONRY INC
GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO
TALL TIMBER TREE EXPERTS
LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS
DANBERRY COMPANY
PRACTICAL SYSTEMS
HARTY JOHN INC
DANBERRY COMPANY
M 6 W WATER & SEWER INC
M {. W WATER (, SEWER INC
STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ
LECY CONST INC
DAHL 2,625.00GUTTORMSON5.000.00SUNDBY4.153.00MARTIN800.00ESTERLY13,465.00CONNER3,200.00GUTTORMSON1,150.00SANFORD365,000.00MARESH16,000.00CUSICK28,300.00WICKLUND400.00
MARTIN 350.00
MARKS .00
WETT 100,000.00
GERLICHER 31,000.00
SWEATT
2,000.00
300.00
ANDERSON 2,500.00
NELSON
13,000.00
3.000.00
SHEKELS 3,700.00
DANE .00
CRAM .00
HOWE
1.695.00
5.259.00
KNIGHT . 00
BRADY 1,000.00
BUTTERFIELD 5,500.00
ZWART 100.00
KRAUSE
11,395.00
2,800.00
3,200.00
HOHRMAN . 00
GOUNTANIS 2,800.00
SEWARD . 00
SCHIMMEL 500.00
HAY 500.00
OSBORN 4,000.00
FARNHAM . 00
SHANNON 10,000.00
FUCHS 3,600.00
CUNNINGTON 8,500.00
PERCIVAL 35.000.00
MCCARTNEY 2,880.00
HASSELOUIST 600.00
ODEAN 3,200.00
DOLEMAN 3,000.00
COOPER 1,000.00
MARKS 35,000.00
HAY
.00
.00
20,000.00
300,000.00
FRr, JUN 28, 199^, 3:56 l^MNUMERICAL LISTING JUNE 1996 PAGE 2PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONSTERNAU4,000.00PETERSON5,000.00HAFSTAD2,600.00BUTTERFIELD660.00KNIGHT.00PEARSON1,200.00PETERSON13,000.00KNIGHT13,000.00CARRINGTON250,000.00
JONES .00
STIPAKOV 1,000.00
BREHM 4,500.00
GARDNER 2,159.00
PIEPHO 2,500.00
LESSER .00
LUKIS .00
342,652.00
450.00
HAUSER 400.00
EARLING 10,000.00
2,200.00
MATTESON 12,000.00
COX .00
HARNS 3,780.00
VITKO 800.00
OR-008083OR-008084OR-008085OR-008086OR-008087OR-008088OR-008089OR-008090
OR-008091
OR-008092
OR-008093
OR-008094
OR-008095
OR-008097
OR-008098
OR-008099
OR-008100
OR-008101
OR-008102
OR-008103
OR-008104
OR-008105
OR-008106
OR-008107
OR-008108
79C
96/06/2496/06/2096/06/1996/06/2096/06/2196/06/2196/06/2596/06/25
96/06/24
96/06/26
96/06/24
96/06/24
96/06/24
96/06/25
96/06/26
96/06/26
96/06/27
96/06/26
96/06/26
96/06/28
96/06/27
96/06/2''
96/06/28
96/06/28
96/06/28
NNNNNNNN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
440110030603925425434519304251920
2320
2020
430
1085
770
165
3250
2255
2855
2801
2165
2715
10
3465
420
80
NORTH ARM DR NORTH SHORE DR FARVIEW LA WATERTOWN RD TONKAWA RD WATERTOWN RD WEST FARM RD TONKAWA RD
6TH AVE N
LONGVIEW CIR
SALEM CT
BROWN RD S
TONKAWA RD
NORTH ARM DR
CRISTOFORI CIR
FOX ST
ABINGDON WAY
SOMERSET LA
CASCO POINT RD
CCLIN DR
COUNTRYSIDE DR
MYRTLEWOOD RD
SHORELINE DR
NORTH ARM DR
CYGNET PL
03 06 24 01 01 01 09 09
01
01
29
02
24
11
01
01
01
02
06
04
01
11
13
11
01
000000001472571539411044288471040000000034791600193322551933225517572926
54791762
14708000
29383589
38711491
16393931
54791762
54791762
15590251
29332521
00000000
00000000
15590251
14733397
00000000
15410304
34782452
THE CARPENTERS CONST CO CENTRAIRE INC PRAIRIE PLUMBINGCOUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C CUSTOM POOLS INC CUSTOM POOLS INC
NEDEGAARD CONSTRUCTION CO
HAYES EXCAVATING
SCHERER BUILDING CORP
STANDARD PLBG U APPL CO
A-ABC APPLIANCE 6 HEATING
CRANDALL EUGENE
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC
THOMPSON PLBG
EIDEN CONSTRUCTION INC
PLYMOUTH ROOFING
WESTERN CEDAR SUPPLY
SCHERBER k SONS INC
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 06/28/96PERMIT TYPEUser Defined SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
CUP
SKETCH PLAN
Sub-total
Grand-total
OTY15
1
0
7*
7**
ZONING pwims issam/Fms collejcted* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 06/01/96 - 06/30/96BASE FEE400.00 1,150.00
300.00
0.00
1,850.00*
1,850.00**
VALUATION00
0
0
0
0000
00
00
00*
PLAN REVIEW00
0
0
0
0000
00
00
00*
0.00**0.00**
QTY06
3
1
10*
10**
PAGE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLE-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 06/01/95 - 06/30/95BASE FEE0.00 1,350.00
600.00
200.00
2,150.00*
2,150.00**
VALUATION0.000.00
0.00
0.00
O.QO*
PLAN REVIBII00
0
0
0
0000
00
00
00*
0.00**0.00**
BFEERPT2-1
DAtr ir 06/28/96
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASE FEE 1,850.00 1,050.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 1,850.00 1,850.00
** PERMIT FEE REP'^*'T
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 06/01/96 TO
* * « «PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
• •
•f.
i
Vm^ Minnesota Dapartmant of Transportation
Matropolitan Division
“* Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 02
Roseville, MN 55113
July 16, 1996 v\!sV
• °i -
Mr. Wili.am S. Mevissen
3725 Watertown Road
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Dear Mr. Mevissen:
I am writing in response to your letter of July 1, 1996 concerning the Minnesota Depanment of
Transportation’s (Mn/DOT) study of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 in the Long Lake and Orono area.
Thank-you for your letter. Mn/DOT welcomes citizen input, and we appreciate the opportunity to
respond.
In April of 1996 Mn/DOT announced that we were no longer considering four-lane expansion of TH
12. Instead we announced our intention to proceed with a project proposed to build a new two-lane
highway adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Long Lake and Orono. The City of
Long Lake has proposed we look at two additional alternatives, one of which includes a new two-lane
highway bypassing Long Lake to the south. Two neighborhood groups from Long Lake and Orono
have proposed that Mn/DOT study an another alternative which includes a three-lane roadway on the
current TH 12 alignment. Under this proposal the center lane is a reversible lane carrying eastbound
traffic during the morning hours and west bound traffic during the evening peak period.
Mn/DOT is in the process of evaluating each of these three alternatives, determining if they are
feasible to carry forward. We anticipate an announcement in late August stating which alternatives we
will carry forward and what that study process will entail. If any of these alternatives our added to our
study we will hold public meetings and have a 30-day comment period immediately following our
announcement.
Again, thank-you for your input. If you have additional questions or comments please do not hesitate
to call Patti Loken (582-1293) or myself (582-1296).
Sincerely,
Tom O’Keefe, P.E.
Planning Engineer
Mn/DOT Metropolitan Division
cc:
Governor Arne Carlson
Senator Gen Olson
Representative Todd Van Dellen
Orono City Council
An equal opportunity employer
I a^ Minnesota Oapartmant of Transportation
Matropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville. MN 55113
July 19. 1996
Mr. John H. Merideth
3685 Watertown Road
Orono, Minnesota 55359
Dear Mr. Merideth:
I am writing in response to your letter of July 1, 1996 concerning the Minnesota Department of
Transportation's (Mn/DOT) study of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 in the Long Lake and Orono area.
Thank-you for your letter. Mn/DOT welcomes citizen input, and we appreciate the opportunity to
respond.
In April of 1996 Mn/DOT announced that we were no longer considering four-lane expansion of TH
12. Instead we announced our intention to proceed with a project proposed to build a new two-lane
highway adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Long Lake and Orono. The City of
Long Lake has proposed we look at two additional alternatives, one of which includes a new two-lane
highway bypassing Long Lake to the south. Two neighborhood groups from Long Lake and Orono
have proposed that Mn/DOT study an another alternative which includes a three-lane roadway on the
current TH 12 alignment. Under this proposal the center lane is a reversible lane carrying eastbound
traffic during the morning hours and west bound traffic during the evening peak period.
Mn/DOT is in the process of evaluating each of these three alternatives, determining if they are
feasible to carry forward. We anticipate an announcement in late August stating which alternatives we
will carry forward and what that study process will entail. If any of these alternatives our added to our
study we will hold public meetings and have a 30-day comment period immediately following our
announcement.
Again, thank-you for your input. If you have additional questions or comments please do not hesitate
to call Patti Loken (582-1293) or myself (582-1296).
Sincerely, . )
Tom O’Keefe, P.E. -------—'
Planning Engineer
Mn/DOT Metropolitan Division
cc:
Governor Ame Carlson
Senator Gen Olson
Representative Todd Van Dellen
(3rono City Council
An equal opportunity employer
i
i ^11?
^ Minnesota D«partm«nt of Transportation
IJ
3 Matropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville. MN55113
July 19, 1996
Mr. & Mrs. Jerome S. Rice
4025 Watertown Road
Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rice:
I am writing in response to your letter of July 1, 1996 concerning the Minnesota Department of
Transportation’s (Mn/DOT) study of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 in the Long Lake and Orono area.
Thank-you for your letter. Mn/DOT welcomes citizen input, and we appreciate the opportunity to
respond.
In April of 19% Mn/1X)T announced that we were no longer considering four-lane expansion of TH
12. Instead we announced our intention to proceed with a project proposed to build a new two-lane
highway adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Long Lake and Orono. The City of
Long Lake has proposed we look a two additional alternatives, one of which includes a new two-lane
highway bypassing Long Lake to the south. Two neighborhood groups from Long Lake and Orono
have proposed tha Mn/DOT study an another altemaive which includes a three-lane roadway on the
current TH 12 alignment. Under this proposal the center lane is a reversible lane carying eastbound
traffic during the morning hours and west bound traffic during the evening peak period.
Mn/DOT is in the process of evaluaing each of these three altemaives, determining if they ae
feasible to carry forwad. We anticipate an announcement in late August stating which ahematives we
will carry forwad and wha tha study process will entail. If any of these alternatives our added to our
study we will hold public meetings and have a 30-day comment period immediately following our
announcement.
Again, thank-you for your input. If you have addition^ questions or comments please do not hesitate
to call Patti Loken (582-1293) or myself (582-1296).
■)
Sincerely,
Tom O’Keefe, P.E. ^
Planning Engineer
Mn/DOT Metropolitan Division
cc:
Governor Ame Calson
Senator Gen Olson
Representaive Todd Van Dellen
Orono City Council
An equal opportunity employer
I £1^ Minnesota Oapartmant of Transportation
5
Matropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 02
Roseville, MN 55113
July 19, 1996
Ms. Jan [)evor
2630 Countryside Drive West
Orono, Minnesota SS356
Dear Ms. Devor:
I am writing in response to your letter of July 1, 1996 concerning the Minnesota Department of
Transportation ’s (Mn/DOT) study of Trunk Highway ^TH) 12 in the Long Lake and Orono area.
Thank-you for your letter. Mn/DOT welcomes citizen input, and we appreciate the opportunity to
respond.
In April of 1996 Mn/DOT announced that we were no longer considering four-lane expansion of TH
12. Instead we announced our intention to proceed with a project proposed to build a new two-lane
highway adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Long Lake and Orono. The City of
Long Lake has proposed we look at two additional alternatives, one of which includes a new two-lane
highway bypassing Long Lake to the south. Two neighborhood groups from Long Lake and Orono
have proposed that Mn/DOT study an another alternative which includes a three-lane roadway on the
current TH 12 alignment. Under this proposal the center lane is a reversible lane carrying eastbound
traffic during the morning hours and west bound traffic during the evening peak period.
Mn/DOT is in the process of evaluating each of these three alternatives, determining if they are
feasible to carry forward. We anticipate an announcement in late August stating which alternatives we
will carry forward and what that study process will entail. If any of these alternatives our added to our
study we will hold public meetings and have a 30-day comment period immediately following our
announcement.
Again, thank-you for your input. If you have additional questions or comments please do not hesitate
to call Patti Loken (582-1293) or myself (582-1296).
Sincerely, /
(
Tom O’Keefe, P.E.
Planning Engineer
Mn/DOT Metropolitan Division
cc:
Governor Arne Carlson
Senator Gen Olson
Representative Todd Van Dellen
Orono City Council
An equal opportunity employer