HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-28-1996 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR TUESDAY, MAY 28, l996,j6id(rT.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
(*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City
Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are
available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet.
ROLL CALL
RECOGNITION - Candace Rowlette OOWNCI. MEOWS
1. CONSENT AGENDA MAY 2 8 1996
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
* 2. Regular Meeting of May 13, 1996
* 3. Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of May 13, 1996
CfTYOFOSONS
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Pir»un)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
* 4. 1996 Joint Use Dock License: Enlow/Lindahl/Mandel - Resolution
5. 1996 Marina Licenses:
- Windward Marina
- Minnetonka Boat Works
- Sailors World
- North Shore Marina
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
ENGINEER REPORT
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
6. Lowry Woods Access Easements
7. Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail
8. Budget Amendments
9. Auihorir k..: *• Apply for Loan for I&I Reduction Program - Resolution
10. 1997-9'/ I til rlennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement (CDBG) - Resolution
s
I
I
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
(♦11.) LICENSES
(*12.) BILLS
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR TUESDAY, MAY 28, 1996, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS
J,05/24 - ParK Commission Work Session 8:00 a.m, - Council Conference Room
Observance
05/SS*^^TueVday ^Council meeting 7:00 p.m.
06/03 - Park Commission - Park Tour 6:00 p.m. (Regular meeting will be held immediately after the
park tour)
06/10 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m.
06/17 - Planning Commission 7:00 p.m.
06/19 - Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. Orono Council Chambers
06/24 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m.
Public A ttendance
Meeting D ate
t C ouncil
Planning Commission
Park Commission
Other
Please fill out the information
REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME (please print)ADDRESS
PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
NAME OR NLMBER
2._
3. _
4. _
5. _
6. _
7. _
8. _
9..
10..
11..
12.
13.
14.
15._
091J9S.4
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MIM!TES FOR MAY 13, 1996
00UNCn.MEET1NQ
MAY 2r^ 1996
ROLL CITY Of ORONO
The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present;
Mayor Edward J Callahan, Jr . Council Members J Diann Goetten. Gabriel Jabbour,
Charles Kelley, and JoEllen Hurr. w ho arrived during the discussion of agenda item #4.
Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett,
Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Public Works Director John
Gerhardson, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Septic Inspector Steve Weckman, and Recorder
Sherry Frost Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m.
POLICE RESERV E RECOGNITION - TED VVESTERDAHL AND C..I.
GONSIOR
Acting Chief Chesw ick recognized the years of service provided by Officers VVesterdahl
and Gonsior in the Police Reserve Officer Gonsior was unable to be in attendance
Officer VVesterdahl, past coordinator Officer Anderson, current coordinator Officer
Thompton. and members of Officer Wosterdahl's family were present.
Cheswick relayed the many activities in which the police reserve serve the community.
Some of these activities are medical calls, traffic control, house checks, patrol of the Luce
Line, assisting at Orono High School for games and parking, security assistance, mutual
aid to border cities, and special events, such as the annual Night-Out and Corn Days
Chesw ick said Officer VVesterdahl w as recognized in March for his 20 years of service.
He is currently employed with the Hennepin County Sheriffs Department and assists as a
Police Reserve Officer in his off-duty time Officer Gonsior began as a Police Reserve
Officer in 1985 1 bs past experience with the Sheriffs Water Patrol was noted as well as
his service as a Scout Master with Troop 20b Cheswick acknow'ledgment the services
provided by VVesterdahl to the Council.
Callahan expressed his appreciation of VVesterdahl as a source of strength and pride to
the community in fiis role as a Police Reserve Officer and asked for his continued service.
(*#I) CONSENT AGENDA
Items #5, 14, and 15 were added to the Consent Agenda.
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote;
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
J
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
AEPROVAL OF MINUTES
(•#2) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 22, 1996
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council
Meeting of April 22, 1996 Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0
(*#3) 1996 BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 24,1996
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Orono 1996 Board of
Review Meeting of April 24. 1996 Vc*te Ayes 4, Nays 0
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
Park Commission Chair Flint invited the Council to attend the Park Tour scheduled for
June 3, 1996, at 6:00 p m.
Flint informed the Council of the Commission's desire to continue construction of the Old
Crystal Bay Road bike trail nort vvard this year to approximately Hwy 12 He noted the
problems that have arisen due to the lack of agreement with Hennepin Parks for
completion of the trail to Baker Park The DNR matching grant funds require the trail to
be connected to Baker Park by the end of 1997
Callahan asked the Commission to consider continuing with the construction of the trail
as it was in the City plans prior to involvement by Hennepin Parks He noted the plan
was still valid The matching grant funds are available and should be used Callahan said
the issue with Hennepin Parks should be separated from the trail plan.
Callahan informed Jabbour, w hen asked, that the concern of Hennepin Parks w as due to
the construction plan of an interchange at CoRd 6 and Hwy 12 that had a potential
impact on Baker Park Callahan said Doug Bry ant of Hennepin Parks and Mn/DOT have
scheduled to meet this month to discuss the intersection
Jabbour said he was concerned w ith a change in attitudes as it was his belief the City and
Hennepin Parks were working together towards completing the trail. He too noted that
Hwy 12 was a separate issue from the trail itself
Callahan expressed the need to determine the construction of the trail past the properties
of two residents w ith particular concents regarding the impacts of the trail and the need
for a decision on how to proceed with that matter Kelley was informed by Callahan that
the City has spoken with the property owners but to no conclusion.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV’ COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(Park Commission Comments - Continued)
Goetten asked for an update at the next Council meeting noting the large amount of time
committed by the Park Commission She felt it was important to extend the faith given in
the trail plan and proceed with constniction unless there are changes to impede its
progress.
Callahan asked Moorse to place the bike trial on the next Council meeting agenda.
Flint informed the Council that the Commission is moving forward with the Park and
Open Space Plan The Park Commission is meeting on May 24 for its own work session
and w ill be ready to meet with the Council in the beginning of June to solicit their input.
A time for the work session between the Council and Commission will be set at that time
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Hawn said she stood by the report as submitted and had no further
comments
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(#4) #2088 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCES -
RESOLUTION #3720
Mr Stephens w;.s present.
Mabusth reported that the vacation of the 30' alley to the west of the property has been
completed The original comprehensive application involved both the current and former
owner for both the vacation and variance application for proposed improvements. The
Planning Commission had recommended the vacation be completed prior to review of tire
variance portion of the application
Mabusth reviewed the improvements proposed for the property consisting of a grade
level and second story additions to house, detached garage, and roofed deck There was
a question on whether the original stone foundation would support a new second story
residence The building inspector approved the use of the original foundation with a new
support wall at the easst wall Mabusth noted that the applicant has met with the
neighbors to tlie w est of Landmark Drive, and they have agreed to a 15 ’ setback from the
west lot line where an existing garage encroaches 1 ’ to 2’ into Landmark Drive right-of-
wav
MINUTES OF THE REGUL.\R ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
{U4 - #2088 Winfield Stephens - Continued)
Mabusth reported that the new construction would extend 6’ further east into the
substandard setback on the north lot line proposed at 3 5' This includes a second story
addition A 26 5' variance is required The structure meets the required 50' setback from
Bayside, but an 8'x21' covered deck extends to the 45' line requiring a 5' setback variance
from Bayside The existing hardcover in the 250'-500' zone exists at 45% and is
proposed at 4% 2% Mabusth noted that the vacated right-of-way was added but this is a
small area
Callahan inquired how the entire 30' alley was added to the Stephens property, when the
normal procedure is for a 50/50 split betwr:'n adjacent property owners Mabusth said
the division of the right-of-w ay is dependent on the underly ing fee ownership The
original owner and applicant entered into an agreement with property owners to west to
insure that they would not make claim to vacated right-of-way Applicants have
submitted the agreement to the County The residents on Landmark Drive had no
interest in the alley It was noted that the propeny is part of the Otto\ ille subdivision in
which uie right-of-way is included.
Kelley asked to view the legal building envelope for the property. Mabusth reviewed the
e.xisting and proposed building envelope
Jabbour noted that without the vacated right-of-way, the property would be very limited
Kelley asked to recall a 1979 variance approval for the property Mabusth said the
previous owner, Mr Ciardiner, never proceeded with that improvement.
Goetten was informed that the old deck was part of the new residence
Mabusth noted that during the Planning Commission review, the neighbor to the north
was found to be required to place his house at the 50' setback and asked that this
proposed construction not encroach further cast along the substandard setback.
Kelley said, even with the use of the foundation, he saw the project as a tear down and
rebuild Mabusth adv ised that this issue w as of major importance to the Planning
Commission Kelley asked what would happen if applicant's structural engineer requires
a new cinder block foundation Mabusth said the application would have to come back
before the Council She added that it was her understanding that the current foundation
was usable. A new cast wall w ill be built but the original foundation of the house will
remai.n The new support wall is required to support the construction of the second
story.
MIMITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETLNG HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#4 - #2088 Winfield Stephens - Continued)
Goetten was informed that the house was originally built in 1902. She askeu what the
use of the east wall will be Mabusth reviewed the elevations and show ed the small
enclosed deck, which will be located within the 6’ eastern exoansion. Goetten was
informed by Stephens that the main floor square footage will be 2100 s.f, less a 20x20
garage The original house is 24x31'
Jabbour questioned the validity of the vacation Mabusth said she was advised that the
underlying fee ow nership and final division of land had been resolved by the County.
Barrett said he speculated that the vacation was completed as a simple interest. He noted
that the vacated property needed to go somewhere, and the County concluded that it
should go to the adjacent lot as originally dedicated
Mabusth said the homeowners on Landmark Drive had no interest. Stephens said he
never discussed the vacation with the Landmark homeowners that Steven Gardiner
conducted all negotiations with neighbors
Jabbour said if the vacation w as completed traditionally with a 50/50 split, there could be
a problem with the construction on this project sitting at the 0 setback Mabusth said it
would then be an encroaching setback Jabbour said it was disturbing and questioned the
validity of the vacation
Callahan noted that the vacation would be from one parcel if parcel is there. Barrett said
that is the assumption.
Stephens said the agreement with the Landmark Drive homeowners was to end the
construction at the 15' setback and attach the garage to the new' construction. The
agreement is in w riting and is to the satisfaction of the Landmark homeow ners according
to Stephens The garage is currently located in the alley.
Goetten said she would like to see appropriate setbacks on this project and inquired if
there was another place for the garage to be located? She is concerned with the 5'
variance for the deck Goetten noted the ambitious project, the odd-shaped lot, and
asked to see changes to the plf»ns
The Council continued to discuss the problem with the vacation and the possibility that
the 15' setback, if the v acation is not valid, the garage w ould be at 0 ’ setback from newly
defined west lot line
5
, ---------.1,^
MIMfTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#4 - #2088 Winfield Stephens - Continued)
Jabbour said he saw the project as a rebuild and preferred that the original house be tom
down and the new home placed farther away from the road He then noted the review
done by the Planning Commission and the lot being buildable with its sewer unit Jabbour
said the property owner is entitled to a house, and even though it is ambitious, it has been
reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission jabbour said he
would prefer the setbacks be changed from 3' to 10' and 40' from the roadway He
continued that he is concerned w ith granting a O' setback, but if the Staff is comfortable
that the vacation is legal and there is a 15’ setback, he would approve it
Callahan and Goetten both expressed concern over the setback. Goetten preferred that
the house be moved forward Goetten said she would like to see improvements to the
plan. She noted the right of the ow ner to build on the property but noted the size of the
lot.
Jabbour asked Stephens if there was value in the existing building or it he was attempting
to accommodate the City ’s requirement of using the existing foundation. Stephens said
he never looked at any other option and believes the house would sit best as proposed.
Kelley noted the mature oak trees on the property Stephens said two would be
eliminated but 0 would remain Maple trees are also located on the property.
Goetten moved, to refer the application back to the Planning Commission Jabbour
informed the applicant that if the application w as denied, he w ould not be able to present
another application for six months
Stephens said he began the process in November He said it was his understanding that if
the foundation was sound and utilized, the plans could be accepted Stephens said it was
also his understanding from Mabusth and the Planning Commission that he was allowed
15% of the total acreage for structural coverage. The proposed structural coverage is
14.3% Stephens said he was told that he would need to vacate the alley, which he has
done, and to come to an agreement with the homeowners of Landmark Drive, which he
has also completed Stephens said the other neighbor to the north is satisfied with the
plans Stephens said he has been before the Planning Commission three times and is
anxious to move forward
Goetten said she is still concerned w ith the size of the structure for the small lot.
Callahan seconded the motion previously made by Goeuen.
(Hurr arrived at this time )
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 1" 1996
(UA - #2088 Winfield Stephens - Continued)
Callahan asked Goetten what direction she would give to the Planning Commission if the
application was sent back to them for review. Goetten said she would ask for reductions
in the plan.
Kelley said the plan does meet the 1 5% structural coverage and could be made even
larger. It was noted that the project could not become larger without additional
variances and the hardcover issue would also be a factor Mabusth commented that any
corrections made would be outside of the 75-250' setback Kelley asked and was
informed that the property is not lakeshore property.
Jabbour agreed that the project could be better by changing the setback or starting from
scratch but did not feel the issue could be forced.
The Council again questioned the vacation. Mabusth said if there is a question to the
document, she noted the vacation and lot have not yet been legally combined, and Staff
could reconfirm the \ alidity as a result of the combination
Callahan said if the vacation is the issue, then there is no need to send the application
back to the Planning Commission. I le asked what the Council could ask the Planning
Commission to do if the structural coverage meets the 15% allowable Goetten
responded that it has be«'n ’■^quested m the past.
V'ote on motion to refer back to Planning Commission: Ayes 2, Hurr, Goetten; Nays 3,
Kelley, Callahan, Jabbour Motion denied.
Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3720 per the Planning
Commission ’s recommendation providing Staff is satisfied of the vacation of the alley as
presently proposed and is included in the homc.stead parcel and legally combined.
Hurr said she had a problem with the hardship for the variance for the size of the
structure
Goetten said she feels that issue of the vacation is most important and that there are other
options available.
Vote; Ayes 3. Kelley. Callahan. Jabbour; Nays 2. Goetten. Hurr. Motion carried.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(*5) #2122 KAREN SKOOG/TAMERA CHRISTENSEN, 280/350 TONhLA
AVENUE
A. VACATION RESOLUTION #3721
B. SUBDIV ISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT-
RESOLUTION #3722
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolutions #3721 and 3722 approving the
vacation and the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement Note the subdivision of a lot
line rearrangement includes the waiving of the sewer assessment against combined Lots
17 and 18 (PID #05-117-23 14 0042) Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#6) #2i24 JOHN A. EARLING, 2165 COLIN DRIVE - VARIANCES -
RESOLUTION #3723
The Applicant was present.
Mabusth reported that the property is located on the south side of the cul-de-sac of Colin
Drive The application involves a street setback variance 1 he extension outlot will
eventually connect to Devin Lane on the west This through road would connect Brown
Road and Willow Drive The proposed garage is to be located in front of the line of the
principal structure
Mabusth informed the Council of the topographical restrictions on the lot. The location
for the garage was due to the slope of the land and the line of the trees The garage will
be 15-16’ high and adequately screened The Planning Commission asked the applicant
to plant evergreens on the north and w est for w inter screening The east side of the
house w as not chosen for the location of the garage due to the well, a drainageway, and
the slope of the land Another alternate spot would have impeded the view' from the new
master b^^droom addition
Mabusth reported that the doors of the garage will face to the east away from the street.
The garage location will be located 50' from the existing cul-de-sac and 10' from the road
extension outlot
Hurr asked whether the driveway would be asphalt or grass Earling said the driveway
would be constructed of a single lane of asphalt straight of!' of the cul-de-sac.
Goetten asked why the garage was not located in an area not requiring a variance.
Earling said he did not wish the garage to be in front of the residence and the thicket area
chosen shielded the garage from evervihing.
s
MINITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
{U6 - #2124 John Earling - Continued)
Mabusth said Commissioner Smith, the only negative vote to the recommendation
motion, wanted the garage located within a conforming setback Other Commissioners
who visited the property noticed the sloping topography and the tree line and agreed the
proposed location was the best place for the garage Mabusth said the neighbors have
not voiced any objection to the proposal.
Kelley asked what the width w ould be if the roadway was constructed Gerhardson said
the road would be a standard 24' width with ditches extending 10-15 ’ on either side. This
was said to not cause a problem with the 10' setback from the outlot It would, however,
expose the structure to viewing Earlin,. agreed to moving the garage a couple feet
farther in to avoid a problem with a roadv^ •' He noted the shelter belt running east and
west along his property.
Hurr was informed that the garage overhang would be 18". Earling was advised that the
overhang must meet the approved setback.
Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3723 with a setback of 12'
including the overhang. Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#7) #2125 RICHARD D. CLIFFORD. 4760 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -
VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3724
The Applicant. Mr Clifford, was present along with Vrs. Olson, the new property
owner.
Mabusth reported that this application is the third time approval has been granted for lot
width and area variances This application requires width, area, and bluff impact setback
variances The stmeture w ill be located 36' from the top of the bluff, where 30 ’ is
required However, there w ill be a 3’ encroachment of the 20' blufl'impact zone.
Mabu-sth said the DNR is in favor of the proposal and has said the land alterations will
improve the drainage
1 he neighbors have questioned the use of the driveway for access. Four parcels currently
have access from the unimproved right-of-way known as Park Avenue The roadway is
in poor condition Another resident of the area, Mr. Koubsk7, is also requesting access
from the north due to the unsafe condition of their existing access at North Shore Drive
at a 20%+ slope The City is asking for an improvement plan f>'om these neighbors.
Gerhardson is reviewing the right-of-way to see what can be accomplished within the 30'
to get the road as close to current standards as possible
MINI IES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#7 - #2125 Richard Clifford - Continued)
Council asked if this right-of-way had an impact on the building Mabusth said the
Planning Commission recommendation did not link approval of variances to the resolve
or upgrade of driveway It was noted that as long as Mr Clifford and future owners
agree to participate in the upgrade and maintenance of the unimproved road, this should
not present a problem She added that some of the neighbors are still using North Shore
addresses, which is confusing for emergency vehicles and others in locating the
properties Signs and reassigned addresses will be required
Mr Clifford had no additional comments.
Hurr inquired if these property ow ners would be assessed from improvements made'’
Mabusth said Staff is awaiting receipt of a plan and do not visualize a public improvement
project
Jabbour noted that other properties have similar situations He said Staff should address
the issue of egress and ingress to the properties but not tie it to this application,
Goetten was concerned that this issue would impact the vaiiance Mabusth said it would
not.
Hurt said she saw no rush in pushing through the application as there has been 3
variances since 1978 Mabusth noted that there is now a new owner involved.
Callahan asked who maintains the unimproved road"* Mabusth said the property owner
of lot marked #4 maintains the road and charges the other users
Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3724 per the Planning
Commission recommendations Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Staff will work with the property ow ners regarding a plan for the road and inform the
Council of such plan
(#8) #2126 cm' OF ORONO - VACATION OF PORTION OF NAVARRE LANE
- RESOLUTION #3725
Mabusth reported that 33’ of Navarre Lane has been vacated for the O'Sullivan project.
Staff saw benefit in also vacating this additional portion Four utilities are located within
the proposed vacation but easements will be taken over the property. The property
owner will grant drainage and utility easements.
Mabusth informed the Council that O’Sullivan will be responsible for the drainage from
the easement parcel with a detention pond located on the church property An agreement
has been made with the church
MIM TES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#8 - U2\26 City ofOrono - Continued)
Kelley questioned the vacation asking whether the City should retain the easement for a
bike path through the area Callahan remarked that there was alot of traffic in the area
Hurr thought it was a good idea
Kelley noted that there is more and more pressure for a bike circuit He noted that the
old road connected Navarre with VVayzata at one time Kelley said it could be used in the
future and could always be vacated at a later date
Hurr asked if the vacation went to Lafayette Ridge, and if easements were taken back.
Mabusth said they were assessed for street lights and easements were taken overall the
vacation
Hurr moved. Kelley seconded, to deny the vacation of portions of Navarre Lane adjacent
to church pioperty and Lafayette Ridge but to complete the vacation of 33’ of right-of-
way adjacent to the O'Sullivan/Smith property Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#9) ON-SITE SYSTEMS CODE - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE
NO. 147, 2ND SERIES
Steve Weekman said the proposed revision to the septic code was due to new State
standards. The ordinance would comply with the changes as well as clean up wording
and omissions presently in place
Goetten commented that she appreciated the 5 year extension for completion of repairs
to the non-shoreland systems found to be non-conforming due only to the lack of 3-foot
separation. VVeckman responded that there are alot of systems in need of replacement,
and it would take time to upgrade the systems.
Jabbour suggested eliminating the shoreland regulation and respond when the need is
shown VVeckman said it was a matter of compliance and need for inspections. He
suggested the Council set a different length of time period for eompletion of the repairs if
the separation issue vvas not of vital importance and no failure of the system is shown.
Jabbour suggested 20 years
Kelley voiced his concern with the need for both primary and alternate sites for properties
of 2 acre non-shoreland He gave an example of a developed lot not having the required
3' separation but having a working system He asked how that property owner could be
asked to abandon a working system to go to an alternate system, which would be the
property owner's "insurance policy", when the state does not require a time period for
conformance on the 3' separation Kelley said if a mound system was installed, and it
tailed, the property owner would not have any alternate solution.
r •
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT^ COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#9 - On-Site Systems Code Ordinance Amendment - Continued)
Jabbour said there were about 600 units in the City non-conforming, mainly due to the 3'
separation requirement He said he was not anxious to get in\olved in this issue He
noted the number of residents being driven out of theii homes due to high taxes and cost
of sewering Jabbour contmented that to ask a resident to pay $20,000 for a system is
terrible, and noted that he wished to sustain the residents Jabbour said it was his opinion
that the new buyers of homes pick up the cost for upgrades
Callahan asked if the Council recommended making the upgrade requirement contingent
on the sale of the property Kelley said no, adding that it be contingent on failure of the
system He noted that if an addition w as done and paid for in cash, it would not trigger
an inspection by any mortgage company Kelley said if a system is conforming except for
the 3' separation and the residents plan on residing there, he saw no reason for them to
need to use that insurance policy and force them to build on their alternate site
Hurr asked when the requirement for both a primar>- and alternate site was initiated.
Weekman said that occurred in 1978 Houses built before that time did not require an
alternate site Mabusth clarified that this is the first time the City would be asking for an
alternate site Weekman said the language has been clarified regarding alternate sites and
any changes to sites
Hurr asked if a site can accommodate an addition but there was no alternate septic site,
would no building permit be allowed because there is no alternate site'’ Weekman said
septic is based on the number of bedrooms and bathrooms but conceded that this scenario
would seriously restrict the property owner ’s options
Jabbour said his vision of the system w ould result in compliance within a year if the septic
system fails, excluding the case of the 3 ’ separation Jabbour continued that if the
property was mortgaged or the property sold, a new owner would force the issue.
However, if an addition was built, he would leave the system alone
Weekman said Gafiron thought 5 years was realistic It was a fair enough time to ensure
people did not forget about the requirement but not so soon as to force the issue.
Weekman thought 10 years would be satisfactory but 20 years would probably result in
the State forcing the 3 ’ separation requirement.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CUT COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(U9 - On-Site Systems Code Ordinance Amendment - Continued)
Callahan said this amendment shows the reason why the application to the Met Council
was made regarding the MUSA line The application would assist people to meet the
requirements where there are problems of non-shoreland, 3 ’ separation, and smaller lots
with no alternate septic sites Moorse said alot of the properties with the smaller lots are
included in the MUSA application Callahan said other property owners in the non-
shoreland areas are required to repair the 3' separation problem within two years
according to the current ordinance VVeckman said this affected any failure, w hether
shoreland or non-shoreland Callahan said the amendment now would separate the
shoreland and non-shoreland properties Kelley added that the state law shows no time
frame
Hurr said if a property is located within the MUSA, the amendment could be used as
leverage to have the property owner buy into the sewering. Jabbour said this would be a
major burden
VVeckman said he understood that the amendment was ditficult for those within the
shoreland resulting in resentment from those not in the shoreland Kelley noted that the
state made the distinction for the City (He noted that there is already distinction
between shoreland and non-shoreland when it comes to setbacks and hardcover.)
Hurr suggested the 10 year requirement as well as Goetten It was noted that the issue
could be revisited at a later date
Kelley asked if the licensed pumpers that pump out the septic systems, take the manholes
off the systems and look at the bailies VVeckman said this is a requirement, but Kelley
said it is never done VVeckman aurced that there was no follow thru VVeckman said the
pumpers will be asked as a requirement for more detailed information The pumpers will
be asked if the pumping was done through the manhole, if the tanks were leaking, or if
the tanks have bottoms VVeckman said inspection of septic systems includes checking
for discharge and identifying whether the 3' separation is met, but the tanks cannot be
inspected as they are full of sew age VVeckman said if the first pump out would include
e.xtending the baffle, all subsequent pumping would be easy Goetten said this was alot of
responsibility with 300-375 pumpings a year
Kelley asked about the integrity of the test for the 3' separation VVeckman said if enough
soil borings are done, the soil tester will have a good understanding of the soil conditions.
VVeckman said the reliability of the test is ultimately based on how good the person is
performing the test VVeckman said identifying the colors of the soil is the most reliable
test Whether the soil is wet or dry when the inspection is done does not affect the color.
Callahan asked if the current ordinance should be amended. Council noted the function
of the 3' separation but not its importance They saw value in developing a reasonable
time limit for repairs
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
- On-Site Systems Code Ordinance .Amendment - Continued)
Kelley asked Weckman if correlations have been developed regarding the 3 ’ separation.
Weckman explained how the separation works noting 1' of good, dry soil is needed to
treat the effluent An annual rainfall is 26", but use of the septic system increases the
water usage 26 times and will result in the water table mounding up When 1', it is
reduced, allowing an area where the effluent could get into the system, and result in only
r separation When the effluent is down 4’ below the surface, it has been shown that no
treatment is occurring due to an absence of oxy gen and bacteria
Callahan remarked that there are alot of systems without the 3* separation working
W'eckman said the water is then going away, and the effluent may or may not be treated,
resulting in the contamination of the ground water
Callahan asked if the system is tested and the 3 ’ separation is not found, does that mean
the system is not working ’ Weckman said the water is going away and not treating the
effluent Callahan clarified that this would mean the system is not working and should be
reported as such. Weckman said septic systems in the non-shoreland area have not been
inspected for the 3' separation yet.
Jabbour said there is then no way to tell if a system is actually working without sampling
the soil Jabbour added that if the State is aware of any aquifers being affected, they
would initiate action immediately
Hurr said she sees the City of Orono as pacesetters and recommended the 10 year repair
requirement Jabbour responded that this would drive people out of the area Kelley said
he believed the State would take some action within 10 years with pressure to sewer the
remaining properties
Kelley asked if a property owner applied for an addition «nd no alternate site w as
designated at the City office, in addition to requiring a percolation test, what happens to
2 acre lots with no alternate sites'’ Jabbour responded that the addition would not be
allowed Weckman answered that if the addition was in the area of the future drainfield
siiC, the addition would have to be moved as the area would have to be set aside for the
future
Kelley said he sees the ordinance amendment as a major piece of legislation to the City.
He continued that the Council needs to be aware of it. and there may need to be
modifications made. Kelley said it was an on-going situation.
i
I
MIMTES OE THE REG I LA R ORONO Cl TV COl NCIE
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
{U9 - On-Site Systems Code Ordinance Amendment - Continued)
Kelley said he questioned the quality of mound sy stems Hurr noted that a mound system
can be rebuilt Weckman said a rebuilding of a mound system uould cost approximately
S5,000-S7,000 A new mound system is approximately SI0.000 It was brought out that
this cost is less than the cost of sewering Weckman said he has never seen the need to
abandon a mound system site and failures are usually the result of bad installation.
Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Ordinance No 147, Second Series, an
Ordinance Deleting Section 5 37 of the Orono Municipal Code Relating to On-Site
Sewage Treatment Systems Contractors, and Deleting Section 5 38 Relating to On-Site
Sewage Treatment Systems Site Evaluators and Designers, and Amending Section 12 30
Relating to On-Site Sewage Treatment Systems, and to approve the abridged version of
said ordinance for publication The .Amendment would establish a period of 10 years for
completion of repairs to non-Shoreland systems found to be non-conforming due only to
lack of 3-foot separation Vote Ayes 5. Nays 0
MAYOR/COLNCTL REPORT
Kelley mentioned the letter to be provided by the City to the Met Council regarding the
MUS.A Amendment Points #2 and 3 have been satisfied An agreement is yet to be
reached with Long Lake Information on the sewer metering is required before the
agreement can be completed Information regarding the metering is expected back this
week accordinu to Cook
Callahan suggested scheduling a work session once the information is received. A work
session is scheduled for Wednesday, May 22, at 8:00 a m , in order to respond to the Met
Council by June 1.
Hurr said she visited Lakeside Marina and submitted photos for the file. She noted some
of the promises made by the marina are yet to be completed
Hurr said she and Jabbour are working with the DNR regarding the Maxwell Bay access
and issue of monev in lieu of ta.xes
(#10) PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
Callahan moved. Jabbour seconded, to nominate Bill Stoddard to the open appointment
on the Planning Commission.
Hurr said she would support the decision of the Council majority but voiced her support
as an alternate, Bruce Kelley, a long time resident of Orono, who would come to the
Commission with wisdom of age Callahan noted that all of the candidates were
qualified
15
in
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNC IL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#10 - Planning Commission Appointment - Continued)
Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, to nominate David Beal to the open position on the
Park Commission, Beal is also noted to be a long time resident of the City. V^ote: Ayes
5, Navs 0.
Callahan suggested filling the position of Vice Chair to the Planning Commission, which
is presently vacant
Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to nominate Dale Lindquist as Vice Chair. Vote:
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Callahan reported that there has been the policy of rotating the chair position on a yearly
basis, which the Council will consider at a future point in time.
ENGINEER REPORT
Cook had no report
It was noted that load limits were removed this week
CITY ADMINISTRATOR ’S REPORT
(#11) CONDITIONAL OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE WORKER POSITION
Moorse reported that the request is for a conditional offer of employment for a public
works maintenance position The offer is conditional as part of the selection process is
the performance of drug testing and a physical Moorse said the candidate is well
qualified
Hurr asked the background of the applicant Moorse said DeBaere worked 16 years with
Long Lake Ford Tractor, 5 years of w hich were spent as a mechanic DeBaere attended
vocational training for mechanics and welding He has also demonstrated heav^
equipment e.xperiencc DeBaere has e.xperience in installation of water lines and lift
stations as well as snowplowing
Hurr was informed that 45 applicants were received for the position.
Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to authorize a conditional offer of employment to be
made to Mr Donald DeBaere for the Public Works maintenance worker position. Vote:
Ayes 5, Nays 0 It was noted that the position is budgeted
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITA' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
<#I2) LORD FLETCHERS REQUEST FOR USE OF PUBUC PARKING LOT
Moorse reported that the request is to allow Lord Fletchers to use a portion of the public
parking lot in Navarre for use by their employees on weekends during the summer
months Shuttle buses will be used to transport the employees between the restaurant
and parking lot Moorse said problems that occurred last year have been worked out
The request is similar to that of last year w ith a number of conditions attached Lord
Fletchers’ representatives said they agree to those conditions
Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to authonze Lord Fletchers to use the public parking
lot in Navarre with conditions #1-8 as listed.
Jabbour asked and received no comments from those in attendance at the meeting. He
also noted that he spoke with a person who had concerns over the use last vear and was
told those problems were worked out
Jabbour asked that the distinction be made why Lord Fletchers would be allowed to use
the parking lot and not Jack Smith It was noted that Lord Fletchers has signs posted for
patron parking and use of the lot by employees only is a good solution It w as also noted
that, because it is a public lot, it could be used by Lord Fletchers’ customers without
specific approval by the City The agreement to allow' employee parking only is a much
better arrangement
The use of the parking lot by the Latayette Club last year was mentioned Hurr noted
that both businesses are located outside of the City of Orono and should be considered on
an equal basis It was noted that the Lafayette Club did not request use of the parking lot
and w ould receive equal consideration if a request was made
A maximum use of 60 parking stalls will be permitted.
Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0
(#13) DAN HANDLIN REQUEST TO ACQUIRE CITV' PROPERTY TO
RESOLVE NON-('ONFORMING DRIVEWAY ISSUE
Moorse reported that the property owners of 3860 North Shore Drive have requested to
acquire a portion of a City property that w as obtained through tax forfeiture in order to
resolve a non-conforming driveway due to its partial location on the City-owned lot.
Moorse said the former owner installed the driveway without permits resulting in a cloud
on the title when it was sold. The new ow-ners went ahead with the purchase of the
property, and money was escrowed to resolve the problem.
MINUTES OF THE REGUL.4R ORONO Cm COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13. 1996
(^^13- Dan Handlin - Continued)
Approval of the request would enable the current driveway to conform Repositioning of
the driveway would be the less desired solution Moorse said the driveway could be
installed on the side of the house where it was originally located This is said to be
feasible but would have impacts on the property Hardships are listed
Callahan noted that it is not legal for the City to sell the property Moorse said the parcel
is owned by the City for a specific use only, similar to a lease situation Once the
property is used for other purposes, ownership would be reconveyed to the County. The
parcel could then be made available to the adjoining propeny owner at market value.
Moorse reported that the City owns lots 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 for use as open space.
Lot 23, the lot in question, has sewer lines running thru it as well as a wetland area that
extends into lot 24
Hurr said she was concerned with setting a precedent noting that there is an alternate
solution of moving the driveway.
Hurr inquired about maintaining an easement on the lot Moorse said the City would do
a lot division reconveying only a portion of the lot necessary to remedy the driveway
problem back to the County and maintain that portion of the lot containing the wetlands
and sewer line
Property ow ner. Don Handlin, said they purchased the property knowing the problem but
still desiring the property It is their intent to solve the issue in a reasonable fashion.
Handlin said the best solution is that which is proposed Changing the driveway would
result in the loss of mature trees and landscaping Handlin said he sees the request as
reasonable He said he is not at fault for the occurrence of the problem but is responsible
for resolving it Flandlin said he agrees with the conditions 1 -4 as listed. He noted that
the property would also be placed back on the tax roll. Handlin said, as far as setting a
precedent, he asked what precedent that would be. It is his understanding that no
precedent would be set by allowing this purchase to occur.
Kelley said that the Council was here to try to help people,
1 lurr noted that the lot w ould be deemed unbuildable due to the wetlands. Handlin said
he would want to protect the wetlands and understands that the lot is unbuildable.
Callahan said he agreed with Kelley noting the public use was not being impacted by this
request
Moorse said the Statf agreed with Council Member Hurr that the City should not
generally sell otTCity property, but the circumstances of this request make it a reasonable
one.
IS
MLNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(#13 - Dan Handlin - Continued)
Hurr said she did not desire the City to sell off City owned property.
It was noted that the driveway was installed after the City gained the tax forfeit property.
Kelley asked Staff to suggest the area of the parcel to be divided The applicant w ill pay
the cost of the division of the lot Kelley also asked that the tw o lots be combined.
Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Mr Handlin's request to acquire a
portion of ♦he City parcel adjacent to his property to bring his existing driveway into
conformance Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0
(•14) GOLF COURSE PURCHASE - T MARKERS
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the purchase of tee markers for the Orono
Golf Course from Imaginality Incorporated for an amount of $5,304. Vote Ayes 4,
Nays 0
r 15) GOLF COURSE PURCHASE - MOWER
Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to approve the purchase of one new greens mow er
from North Star Turf for an amount of $3,925 18 Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#16) BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR 1995
Kelley asked why adjustments arc made to match up to expenses He noted that this
does not reflect what actuallv occurs
Kelley said if residents want to see the budget and what actually occurred in a year, they
would see the same result. He questioned why a budget is then done at all Moorse said
it was a matter of reflecting decisions made during a budget year to spend more than the
original budget amount
Jabbour said the money brought in is spent but this makes it difficult to ascertain the
difference
Callahan moved. Jabbour seconded, to approve tiie budget adjustments and transfers
above for the 1995 General Fund budget Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Callahan commented that Staff had provided an investment report for Council review.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CUT COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
(•#17) 1996 FIRST QUARTER REV ENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT
(INFORMATION ONLY)
Information only, no Council action required.
CITY ATTORNEY ’S REPORT
Barrett had no report.
(•#18) LICENSES
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the following licenses: Vote: Ayes 4, Nays
0.
Garbage & Refuse Collector's License:Baldy Sanitation
5906 Henry Street
Maple Plain
Blackowiak & Son Sanitation &
Rolloff Service
1195 Sunnvfleld Rd N.
Mound
Cleanway Sanitation, Inc.
P O Box 222
Long Lake
Woodlake Sanitary Service
98 13 Flying Cloud Dr.
Eden Prairie
Parade 7 Special Event Permit:David L. McNichols
Burnet Realty
Walk-a-thon
May 18, 1996, 10:30 - 2:30 p.m.
(•#19) BILLS
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the payment of the All Funds Account.
Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 9;56 p.m
Edward J. Callahan, Jr, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M Hallin, City Clerk
OOUNCLMEETilQ
RECONN'ENED 1996 BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
.MINUTES FOR MAY 13, 1996 may 2 8 1996
(#1) ROLL C(TY OP 0°OMQ
The Orono Board ofRe\iew met on the above date with the followirg members present:
Mayor Edward Callahan, Jr, Council Members J Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, and
Charles Kelley JoEllen Hurr was absent The following represented City Staff City
Administrator Ron Moorse. City Assessors Rolf Erickson and David Wilde, and
Recorder Sherry Frost The meeting was called to order by Mayor Callahan at 6:30 p m.
i#2) COLNCIL ACTION ON ASSESSOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS
(#3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public response was gathered prior to Council action
Curt Ouady. 1223 Brown Road South, PID /*10-l 17-23 31 0065, property listed on page
2 of the .Assessor ’s report, was present and informed of no change in his property's
valuation Quady said he received the form letter on this date. May 13 He had no
additional comments from those previously made regarding the improvements necessary
to bring his property up to the value stipulated by the .Assessor to satisfv that amount.
Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to accept the l*?^/ assessed value of $104.C00
Vote .Ayes 4, Nays 0
Mr Quad) said he would take the next step and bring the issue up to the Hennepin
County Board of .Appeals
Katherine Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive. PID »f07-l 17-23 12 0016, property listed on
page 15 of the Assessor ’s report, was present Letters from Mr. & Mrs Kalw eit were
distributed prior to the start of the meeting in regards to their current assessment
Goetten asked Kalweit if she has heard from Staff regarding the concerns brought
forward at the last Board of Rev iew meeting Kalweit said she had not Moorse
responded that he had not contacted the Kalweit's but has discussed the matter with the
City Engineer and Public Works Director No conclusion has been made on what action
to take, but Moorse .said he will pursue the matter
Kalweit asked the Council on what they based their evaluation regarding, acceptance of
the .Assessor ’s valuation of their property Jabbour informed her that no decision has
been made Callahan clarified that the letter received by Kalwe't from the Assessor stales
the .Assessor stands by his original valuation Goetten noted that Kalweit did deserve a
response to her questions
MINlfTES OF THE RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW
MEETING HELD ON MAV 13, 1996
(Board of Review - Continued)
Kalweit asked if the valuation included the tuck-under garage She commented that the
woman who conducted the exterior assessment noted a "new" tuck-under aaraue but
Kalweit explained that the garage was built 27 years ago Erickson informed Kalweit
that they have never been charged for the garage in their property taxes, and the garage
was "new" to their records He added that the value of the garage was only a small
portion of the valuation at about SI,200 to 51,400 Erickson reponed that if the garage
was recently built, it would be noted as an improvement to the propeny on their
statement
Jabbour commented on the limits of the substandard lot, the navigational problems, and
the less than pristine lakeshore, which brings the value of the property down from other
properties nearby
Callahan asked Kalweit what she believed the property was worth Kalweit said the
property's valuation should be the same as last year's value, though, she conceded that the
tuck-under garage not previously included should be taken into consideration. Kalweit
said it was not reasonable to increase the value of the property due to the condition of the
lakeshore and noted the probable difllculty in selling the property in its present condition.
Jabbour advised Kalweit that any known problems would have to be made known if the
property was being sold
jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend tne value of the prooerty remain at
$240,000, which is the current valuation, due to the storm sewer problem
Kelley noted that the proposed increase was $18,000. This followed a valuation of
$239,000 in 1995 and $240,000 in 199o Kelley said he believed there should be some
increase in value shown in the lakeshore property even with the problems listed
Jabbour said tlie storm sewer problem could possibly cause the loss of lakeshore with the
presence of the sediment I le noted the channel had been cleared by the DNR, but he
personally was unable to navigate it at last attempt
Kelley said the back up of sewage from loss of electricity could happen elsewhere in
Orono
Callahan agreed that it is likely that the property has appreciated somewhat and
recommended amending the valuation to $245,000 for 1997, which is a reduction from
the proposed valuation of $258,000 Kelley seconded the amended motion Vote: Ayes
4, Nays 0
Kelley informed Kalweit that if the City makes corrections to the storm water pioblem,
she would see a drastic increase in the value of her property
MINUTES OF THE RECONVENED BOARD OF REMEW
MEETING HELD ON MAY 13,1996
(Board of Review - Continued)
Jabbour commented that with the need to remove the sediment, the value should have
decreased He informed Kalweit that she had the option to go to the Hennepin County
Board of Appeals
Kalweit said it was her desire to call attention to the problems not being addressed
Goetten said Moorse will address those problems
Callahan asked for and received no additional public comments He asked if the Board
had reviewed the final recommendations All members agreed to the atVirmative.
When asked for further comments, Goetten noted her appreciation of a reduction in value
of a Navarre property.
Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to deny the appeals and accept the recommendations
included in the Assessor's Repon e.xcept as noted above regarding the Kalweit property.
Erickson said he has received three additional letters from property owners requesting to
go before the Board of .Appeals They are as follows; 1) Robert Owens, 1700 Bohns
Point Road, PID #16-117-23 22 0003, 2) Doug Johnson, 1355 Shoreline Drive, PID
#02-117-23 34 0012, and 3) Phillip Otto, 4116 Highwood Road, PID #07-117-23 44
0087. Erickson said he reviewed the properties and sent appropriate letters.
Jabbour commented on the valuation of the property owned by Mur Senn, listed on page
10 of the report He noted the limitations to the lot Erickson said in his opinion the
property is a bargain at that price Erickson said at $137,000, the propeny is horribly
undervalued. He noted entry level lakeshore property is valued at least $100,000.
Jabbour said the increase was !a:ge, but Erickson said it was a fair price
Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Jabbour asked if anvihing was being done with the problems occurring in the
neighborhood of the Lorence property Moorse said he is meeting with the building
inspector and acting police chief to see what can be done It was noted that a neighbor is
illegally renting boat slips Callahan remarked that possibly legal act'on should be
pursued Erickson noted that a property can be assessed by its use regardless of the
zoning district in which it is located Jabbour said the neighboring property is being used
as a location for parties, and the 4 boats are blocking the channel
Jabbour asked Cheswick to consider the use of radar to track the speed in the area of
Forest Lake and North West .Arm Cheswick said he would check into the possibility.
OOUNCLMEETM
MAY 2 8 1996REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
ITEM NO (
■/
Department Approval:
Name Michael P. Gaffron
Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: Joint Use Dock License - Enlow/Lindahl/Mandel
(3155 North Shore Drive)
List of Exhibits
A - License Resolution
B - Application
This Joint Use Dock License application exhibits no changes from previous licenses. The City
has received no complaints regarding the operation of this dock. The application fee and late
fee have been paid.
Staff recommends approval of a 1996 Joint Use Dock License for Enlow/LindahlAlandel
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt the attached resolution granting a Joint Use Dock License for 1996 to
Enlow/Lindahl/Mandel,
.seconded by to adopt ResolutionPropo.sed Motion: Moved by ________
#______, directing staff to issue a Joint Use Dock Licen.se to the Ow'ners of Property at 3155
North Shore Drive. 3185 North Shore Drive and 1406 Bohn's Point Road for the period of
January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996. Vote: ______ayes,_______nays.
I
I
C J.Cf'3
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3155 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, 3185 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,
and 1406 BOHN’S POINT ROAD
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1996 TO DECEMBER 31,1996
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and
responsibility under Minnesota Statutes. State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, ct. scq., to
protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the
public within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit
of the City ofOrono with the l.ake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural
Resources of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police
power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all
equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters
and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety
and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the
property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina
owners'to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property.
The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by
protecting against inierferenee by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of
riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and
is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparitm owner has exclusive privileges
over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the
public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth ot the public waters. There can be
no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right
to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other
riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian
owner.
Page 1 of 2
r
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes
the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only
as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a w ay as to ensure there is no abuse of
the limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction
and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or
more families, w hich regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section
5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general
conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an
annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLN'ED, that the City Council of the City of
Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and
conditions noted on Exhibit A attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 28th day
of May, 1996.
Ildward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothv M. Hall in. Citv Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
1 he foregoing instrument was acknow ledged before me on this 28th day of May,
1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor &, City Clerk of the City of Orono,
a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I.LICENSEE: Property ouiiers of 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive and 1406
Bohn’s Point Road
Dock Address: 3155 North Shore Drive
Agent: D. John Lindahl, Jr.
Address: 1406 Bohn's Point Road, Wayzata, \TN 55391
Licensee is:XX unincorporated homeowner's group
___ incorporated homeowner’s association
___ unincorporated club or recreation group
____ incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - Januarv 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996
II.BOAT DENSITY
The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached
plan, Exhibit B. and in accordance v'^ ith Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized
boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year’s license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bav
Transient (Day use only) Slips
Permanent Moorage Slips
Boat Lifts
Sub-Total: Slips at Dock
Offshore Buoys
Maximum Boats in Water
Maximum Boats per prior license
MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY
Crystal
3
1
3
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is
a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B-2.
Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/'or the
LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance w ith these conditions. Failure to
comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/dr prosecution b\ the City.
V.
This license is granted subject to the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution #1212
of the Citv council, summarized as follows:
a) The three properties to which this Joint Use Dock License is granted are described
as follows:
i)(P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0001) "That part of Gov't Lot 1 lying East of the West
442.93 feet thereof and North of the South 1058.3 feet thereof and South of
Registered l and Survey No 269" (3155 North Shore Drive - Mandel)
ii)(P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0015) "Tract I and the West 28.5 feet of Tract H,
Registered Land Survey No. 269" (1406 Bohn's Point Road - Lindahl)
iii)(P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0016) "Tract G and that part of Tract H lying East of
the West 28.5 feet thereof. Registered Land Survey No. 269" (3185 North
Shore Drive - Enlow)
There shall be only one dock allowed on the Mandel lot (P.I.D. 09-117-23 33 0001)
which dock shall be no greater than 100 feet in length, and which dock must be
constructed in accordance with all applicable City and LMCD ordinances, and which
dock is intended to serve only the owners and their successors of the 3 properties
described in a) above.
On the Mandel lot (P.I.D. 09-117-23 33 0001) either attached to the dock, moored
in front of the lot or located on the lot, there may not be at any time more than three
watercraft, as defined by the LMCD, either docked, moored, or stored.
The three watercraft allowed may be owned only by the owners of the properties
described in a) above.
Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any
vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this
resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such
regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem
necessar)' from time to time in the public interest.
I*
• r
P«.optA.t^ I 0^)V
r
I "
0
r
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
LICENSE YEAR 19 96
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
Date Form Sent by City Staff January 26. 1996
Date Application Returned to City-----
Fee Received S K I By Employee
S: ction 5.42, Subdivision 2 T ICENSE REOLTRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association
of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or
participate in ... joint u-^e (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor
from the City.
PLEASE COMPI ETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS. AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY
20 OF THE LICENSE YE.\R
A«;<sOrTATTON INFORMATION
1
2.
3.
Association title or name (if any)
Lake
iJ.tiO?__
Bav c
Person responsible for this applicat
Name _> •• hone ‘Vl‘1 ^coCB
Mailing Address
4.
Relationship to association____
Association is (check applicable items):
X unincorporated homeowner's group.
_____ incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
____ incorporated club or recreation group.
Page 1 of 5
I
Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items):
provide boat mooring and lake access for residential propeny
_____ provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock
_____ provide a club or association gathering place for activities.
Dock is located on (check applicable item);
X one member’s private property.
_____ easement or outlot owned in common.
_____ property leased by the group/association.
_____ property' owned by the group ssociation.
List Dock location ai.d ownership information;
Street address ^o/CTTi j
Legal property description
PID#- 13 -
Listed property owner(s)
Names of abutting lakeshore property owners; ^
/tlsJoiiliAVe.sti
(Name + Address)
South-East)3 10^ M>a.TH
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property owners _
SAjloviy A/oAJ^3f.0c.
(Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary)
Insurance Coverage - The Jointly used dock is insured by one of the following;
yK property owner's homeowner's policy.
_____ separate group/association owned policy.
List the following information:
Name of insured
Name of insurance carrier
Name of insurance agency
Policy No. ____________
t;r/f 4 JLaA
Effective date of coverage
Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence S
Public liability, per occurrence $.
3<=<ik
Page 2 of 5
10. Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable
items);
___ security lighting property owner's presencefencing
contract security service other (specify)
DOCK CJFORMATIQN
11 . List Dock Use Area Specifications:
Width of shoreline;>io ft. Length of main dock fi-om shore. ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; _________ ft. and _________ ft.
Dock Construction (check applicable items):
X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year)
_____ permanent piling with seasonal deck ____ permanent piling and decking
X wooden decking metal decking
13.List Dock .Accessories:
Number of fire e.xtinguishers available at the dock
Number of life preservers available at the dock _/OT
List number of slips in each categoty' ("slips" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips ______ Transient (day use) off-shore buoys
Permanent moorage slips ^
Dry storage (rack) slips ______
Permanent moorage off-shore buoys _
Ma.\imum number of boats at the dock
15.List number of off-street parking spaces av ailable for users of the joint use^ck. Parking,
if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. ----- spaces,■r
y-RnSION AND SKDl.MF.NTA nON CONTROL
1 6. Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items):
A stone rip rap ___ wood seawall ___ metal seawall concrete seawall
X grass and vegetation only other (specify)
17.
-----------------------------j ------------------ - V r .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------— j
Depth of water at shoreline: ft; at 50 ft. out; ? ; at 100 ft. out. ——
Page 3 of 5
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A nOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS /^/7Vrc_m-0
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreLne width of this property, the side property
lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys If off-street
parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on
the plan
B IJNTNCQRPORATFD groups or ASSO CI-'^TIONS
Y ' A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users
^ —■
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use.
Note This copy is not required if the applicant initials and ccrtilies the following statement. This
is a renewal apphcation and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement
onginaJly made in_______(state year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
c. rNrORPOR^ATED CLLT3S OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2 A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association
members
A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corn Note:
These copies are not required if the applicant mitials and certifies the following v«.f i ITiis is
a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation
and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in-------------(state year) and on tile with the
Cin’
Applicant’s initials
ANXTTAL LirFNSF FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule
INITLAL APPLICATION FEE
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year
PI .I IS .SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip,
lift, dry’ stack, or buoy
^ slips @. 2.00 each
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION
S
S 20 00
S
s
6-00
Page 4 of 5
LATE FEE - Renewals
Application for renewal of Ucenses shall be made no later than March I of the license year. Ihfi
ritv shall not arrppf ap{^tions received after Febmarx’ 20 unless the applicatiflP
is accompanied bv a Tattf^e of S25 00.
RFVTFAV PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and,
in the case of new or unusual appUcations, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED ANT)/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Seaion 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City
Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of
Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to
perform safetyrfatnphanrpjnspections
Signed Date
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Ni SS323
(612)473-737
OQ/Oe/% 07:36:21
LICENSE - OTIER BUS.
1 B 51.00 51.00
SUBTOTAL
TM
TOTAL SALE
RECEDE
51.000.00
51.00
51.00
CNANEE
CLERKI 01 TRANS# US9
0.00
Page 5 of 5
4• •
COUNCLMEETINQ
MAY 28 1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cnvoFomo
DATE: May 24. 1996
ITEM NO.:t)
Department Approval:
Name Michael P. Gaffron
Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: 1996 Marina Licenses - Windward Marina - Minnetonka Boat Works - Sailor’s
World - North Shore Marina
List of Exhibits (For each Application)
A - Application
B - Site Plan
C - Additional Pertinent Information
Summarx
Complete 1996 license applications have been received from the four marinas noted above. A brief
description of each marina ’s current operation is included for Council review.
Conditions of License Approval
Section 5.43, Subd. 5(C), requires that each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum
operation standards:
1. Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking
congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through
neighboring property.
Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
3.Retail sales a^'d ser\ ice shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except
as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises
stored boats.
4. The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage.
5. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions
for traffic entering and leaving the site.
, - • :—r* I,
Request for Council Action continued
page 2 of 5
Marina Licensing
B.
6.Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be
limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall
be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation
plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses.
7. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties.
A. Windward Marina
Windward Marina has 40 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 78 on Browns Bay for a total of
118. The marina sells and ser\ ices boats and equipment in the facility on the Tanager Lake
side of Shoreline Drive. A gazebo/toilet building is provided on the Browns Bay side.
The site includes 26 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side, and 47 stalls on the Tanager Lake
side, a portion of which are located on the adjacent residential property in w hich Mr. and
Mrs. Rivers reside. The attached site plan was approved by the City via Resolution #2674
on August 14, 1989. All aspects of the site plan as approved have been completed.
Staff confirmed on May 22, 1996 that the bead type styrofoam floats have been replaced,
hence Windward's 1995 license was issued on 5/23/96.
The applicant has generally adhered to the seven minimum operation standards. Aspects of
the operation which require ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the
operation standards, include storage of marina equipment on the residential overflow parking
area, maintaining parking spaces within the paved lot next to the building as opposed to
filling it with boats for sale, and managing parking to minimize customer necessity of
crossing County Road 15.
StalT recommends approval of 1996 license for Windward Marina.
Minnetonka Boat Works - Orono Site
Minnetonka Boat Works rents 66 slips on Tanager Lake and 48 slips on Browns Bay.
Facilities include 68 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side of County Road 15, vvitli minimal
amenities, including two portable toilets. The existing building on the site is used mainly
for storage, and is beginning to show its age and lack of upkeep. The City has had inquiries
from the property owner regarding construction of a new building on the site, but there is no
indication that formal plans are in progress.
Request for Council Action continued
page 3 of 5
May 24,1996
Marina Licensing
reauire a conditional use permit.require a . the* nroneriv owner to
Activities occurring a. the
of the building. , , j u,. Minnetonka Boat
, of a 1996 .arina license for MinnetonUa Boat WorUs.
Staff recommends approval of a 1996 m.
c.
D.
Sailor's World
Sailor's World ^'”“'™'thl"ardtclpTnr'^«k has be"en
^o^rdrng'^^^^^^ re:i ’:" 'T^rrAtc’tC
recently renewed the letter . . . ,u^ nrooeity owner in=£55|fg=^sa
parking and traihe P™*’'"’..\JpiJ^g,he site neat and orderly.
Lsignated landscape areas, and keep
a „valofa 1996 marina license for Sailor's World.
Staff recommends approv al
North Shore Marina -Jpo H v the City only
,C .orth Shore M--—^
Copeny - is used as a cmetaker umt.
dwellings, one ol whicn
Request for Council Action continued
page 4 of 5
May 24, 1996
Marina Licensing
The site prov ides ample parking for customers in the summer and a large capacitv for storage
in the winter.
Two activities on the site require a conditional use permit application. These include the
caretaker dwelling unit and on-demand public boat launching (dry stack operation). Staff
met with Mr. Anderson on May 22nd regarding the required CUP application and a second
meeting has been set for Monday, June 3rd, to review il.e proposed landscaping plan and
assist applicant with completing the CUP application requirements. Applicant has
acknowledged that these two activities occurred during 1995 absent the required conditional
use permit, and has expressed a spirit of cooperation in completing those requirements within
the next few months. Both activities requiring a CUP have been ongoing for many years
prior to the CUP requirement.
Activities occurring on the site which require the property owner's ongoing attention in order
to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include limiting storage of boat
trailers and other equipment to those areas noted on the approved site plan (specifically
keeping the area between the road and the diy stack units free of storage), and keeping the
site neat and orderly.
As part of the 1984 variance approval for the service building, the prior owner was required
to establish certain landscaping items, which is also an ongoing concern of the City,
especially in relation to screening along property boundaries. This will be further addressed
in conjunction with the conditional use permit application forthcoming.
This license application was received after the March 1st deadline and the fee paid included
the $100 late fee.
Staff recommends approval of a 1996 license for North Shore Marina.
E. Lakeside Marina - Update
Lakeside Marina has not yet submitted a 1996 license application nor the requir ;
conditional use permit application for operation of a boat club, on-demand public bo.,
launching, transient public boat launching, charter boat port-of-call, and possibly a caretah- ■
dwelling unit, all of which are activities quoted by the applicant in his 1995 license
application as occurring on the property.
Request for Council Action continued
page 5 of 5
May 24, 1996
Marina Licensinu
1 met with Councilmcmber Hurr and LMCD Administrative Technician Greg Nybeck at
Lakeside on May 1st and we confirmed that tix 'tvrofoam conversion has been satisfactorily
completed. Lakeside's 1995 license was never brought forw ard to Council for review during
1995 pending completion of the styrofoam conversion. The 1995 license will be brought
forward for Council approval if/when the 1996 license application is submitted.
I met with Mr. Dunn and inspected the site with him on May 9th, at which time he indicated
the 1996 license application and CUP application would be submitted shortly. Neither ha\ e
been received as of this writing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of 1996 commercial marina licenses for Windward Marina, Minnetonka
Boat Works - Orono, Sailor's World Inc., and North Shore Marina.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Proposed Motion: Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff to issue
1996 commercial marina licenses to Windward Marina, Minnetonka Boat Works - Orono, Sailor's
World Inc., and North Shore Marina subject to continued compliance with the minimum operation
standards. Vote: _______ ayes,____nays.
License Year
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66, Cnstal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Phone 473-7357
Date application sent to Marina Z-U Date application returned to City
ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION -
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43. Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is
unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained
a license therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUB.MIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH
1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
BUSINESS INTORMATION
1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME ^ !AJ M^_____________
Street Address ^ f/______________________
Mailing Address_______________________________________________________
2.
Marina Phone
0\WERSH1P/0PER,ATI0N
Fee Owner (if different than above)
Office Phone
Address
Phone
BUSINESS ORGANIZ.YflON: (Check applicable item)
individual ownership ____ partnership corporation
List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title:
Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation:
List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public
during the boating season:
dock attendants __ repair or service personnel1
others available for sales/public information, etc.
Page 1 of 5
uu. .VCO' Shon 0. .on, .em, business occupun. of U.e prope^y oU,. then 0.e Business
noted above; ____________________________________
4.
5.
ACTIVITY (Check all senices offered):
Accessorv USSS
Priq^ipal Uses
X in-water slip rental
sales of boats/motors/trailers/
marine accessories
boat repair and servicing
on-land boat storage
2i winter ^summer
UsCS
A head pumpout
X
marine fuel sales
sale of bait and fishing tackJe
DsesJPaidiligaaia!^
is Recmired)
boat club ,
^ public boat launching, on-demand
public boat launching, transient
charter boat port-ot-call ^
X fishing tournament site
__ sale of pre-packaged food
dive shop
\ clubhouse (for slip or
boat club customers)
lessons/teaching .
boat rental
sailboard sales/rental
iceboat sales/rental
X
ice fishing tackle sales
cross-country ski sale/rental
charter boat port-ot-call / 'X K
^ caretaker dwelling J
micl^FSS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items);business S only
open all year p^,
List proposed hours of operatton: dock acc^^
retail sales
& serv'ice.f-,. 6 AM to
f —
M.\RINA security is provided by. -------
CARETAKER living on site? -------
PM
Owned Boats Spaces
7. boats stored in the water ^ ^
(for lake use) ____ _____^
At dock slips ------- -------------------
Total Boats in Water -------a.U&-
Page 2 of 5
9.
10.
11.
BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR L.\KE USE
a. Inside Buildings -------
b. Outside on Racks -------
c. Outside - other means -------
Total Boats Stored on Land
for Lake Use -------
TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE
(Add 7 and 8)
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER)
a. Transient boats (repair/sercice)
b. New boats for sale (inventory)
c. Used boats for sale (inventoty)
d. Other (list:__________________)
Total
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER)
a. Transient boats (repair/service)
b. Contract storage (customer's boats)
Inventory (new & used boats)
m
Inside Building Outside Building
ML-
5*0
Inside Building
Total
Outside Building
IS__
c.
d.
I c>
Other (list'
Total
)
Total
OFF-STRFFT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
12.SUMMER PARKING
a. Retail sales/service customers
8 spaces minimum (+l per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.)
b. Boating customers
6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] =
c. Launching ramp customers (day use)
10 spaces minimum per ramp =
Charter boat port-of-call
spaces
spaces
spaces
d
1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity
[gross charter capacity x 0.33] =
Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d)
Total spaces available per attached parking plan
spaces
_ _ _ spaces
spaces
13 WTNIER P/VRKING REOUIRED
a. 0.20 X (line 12e)spaces
Page 3 of 5
DOCK CONSTRUCTION
14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY:
_____ Permanent ____ Seasonal
___ Wood ____ Concrete
Wood Metal
Pilings:
Decking:
Flotation Method (if used): X Foam
__ De-icing normally used
Metal ____ Other____
Other__________________
Barrels Other
MCFNSE STANDARDS ADV l^iQBY
Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and
performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license
standards:
Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance
coverage for the duration of the license period.
B. I irenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the
licenseholder. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all
businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be
separately licensed but shall be allow'ed only when in conforma.ice with the
provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards.
C.Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following mmimun:
operation standards:
1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate tratfic or
parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-stn :t parking, and avoid pedestrian
traffic through neighboring property.
2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
e.xcept as necessary' to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use
of premises stored boats.
4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage.
5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view
obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site.
6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall
be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan,
which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license
application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable
uses.
7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties.
Page 4 of 5
Business Use T icenses l imited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning
district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning
district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license.
l icense Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause
for license suspension or revocati*^' pc'* the provisions of this chapter.
ATTACHMENTS
The following must accompany this application:
1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKJNG PLAN indicating the boundaries of
the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage
areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access
areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show-
all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for
the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of
winter storage and required winter parking spaces.
2. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of tlie license
period. />/wfevo
3. Copy of >our LMCD LICENSE .APPLICATION.
4. COM.MERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City
fee schedule.
Initial Application @ ‘^300.00 ;::5----------
Renewal Application i>200.00 ----
Late Fee (if not post, ked by
March 1) SI00.00
TOTA! JUE THIS APPLICATION S 7'Sd_____
RFVTFAV PROCEDURE . • ^
When a complete application is received, the City Council wall review the license application and
will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures ot Chapter 5.
THF ^^^ARTNA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UP^N ^HF. LICENSE
BY THE CITY COL^TIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono
Citv Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authoriz-’s the City ot
. , , ________ ________rin-in.T.V fit 011%'
L.IIV \wUUllCll lU ICVIV,» ----------------------------
Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any
■ ■ ■ perform^jjxfet^nd code ^mpliance
_ f' !iAuthorized Signatur
Title /r<
Date o ^
Y
Relationship to Owner
Page 5 of 5
1
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
02/29/% l5:2lsW
LICENSE - OTHER BUS. _1 I 200.00 200.00
yiNDUARD MflRIiC D0Q( LICENSE
1 I 0.00 C.00
SUBTOTPL
TAX
TOTAL SALE
RECEIVED
200.00
0.00
200.00
200.00
CHANEE
CL£«I 03 TRANBI
0.00
1013
T
• !?-• •'. •- i'^
> j \..1 •••
t
; .’
^
\ ..
•
%
. *V.'
-. ''
^?/
■. /■"
®^-,_ ^
e:
_»_ 4 -----—
.■---------------------------------^
' • •• —••■v«'»»'^ ., •i-#.-,
■'■>>•;" S'-’
|^:v ■■
bk\:
■■•, ■7:- .
' "xi "1 '^V ^ ^i’j
^ -• • — =^“• ’■- ■ - . r • - ■" •■ ■
Miiliifii
BOARD MEMBERS
Douglas E Babcock
C^aiv Tonka Bay
Tom Reesp
.-ceC^'af Mo-ind
Jos-Df^ Zwak
Secretary Green^vood
Robert Rdscop
Treasurer Shorewood
Kent Dahien
M nneionka Beach
Bert Foster
Deephaven
Gretchen Magiich
Mmr>etonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
Craig MoHet
Victona
Craig Nelson
Spnng Park
Eugene Partyka
Minnetnsta
Paul Stark
E*ce!siOr
Herb J Suerth
Woodland
Orono
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAV^TATA BOULEVARD SUITE 16C • WAV2ATA MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEOmONE 6l2 473 7033
G Alan wiiicuti EXECUTIVE D irector
March 29, 1996
Mr. James Rivers
Windward Marine
1444 Shoreline Drive
Wayzata, MN 55291
Dear James:
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of
Directors has approved your multiple dock license
for the 1996 season. The license and the approved
site plan with stipulations, if any, are enclosed.
Any additional changes will require a new license.
Please review the 10/12/95 memo enclosed that
outlines the proper number of watercraft that can
be stored at a multiple dock facility. LMCD staff
fully intends to enforce this section of the Code
during the 1996 season.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions.
Your cooperation in complying with LMCD Code is
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Gregory's. Ny
Administrative Technician
end: license, site plan, 10/12/95 memo
cc: City of Orono
60*. Recycled
30** Post Consjmtf Waste
1512.50
No. 9g-80 195 VvSU
119 BSU unit$
MULTIPLE DOCK AND MOORING
AREA LICENSE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
County of Hennepin, Suie of MinnesoU ss.
WHCRLAS,WINDV’ARD MARINE, INC.
hn paid ihe sum of Fifteen Hundred *^v*elve and 50/100 *s ------------------ DOLLARS
lo Ihe Treasurer of aaid LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT as required by the Ordinances of laid
Disinci and complied sviUi all the requiremenu of said Ordiaances accessary foe obuining this ;
NOW. THEREFORE. By order of Ihe Board of Oireciori of said District and by virtue hereof, the said
_________________WINDWARD MARINE. INC.__________ is hereby licensed and suihoriied to
operaie a muliiple dock subjeci to esisung and future denaily policies and regulatioitt adopted by the Disiricfs Board
season and
for ihe period of the
j,„g Do combo r 31 19 96 subjcci to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances.
Violaiions of the provisions of the Disincf’s Code of Ordinances
a -e punishable by imprisonment for noi more than 90 days or imposilion of a fine of noi more ihan 1700. or both.
Given under my hand and the corporate Kal of the ’-\KE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this
13th . March a n iq 96 ^ /
Aiiesi Alah nefuolas F. Babcock
LIGHTING OF MULTIPLE DOCKS
License is subject to LMCD Code Sec. 2.03, Subd. 12, which states in part —
"Dock lighting shall not be directed toward the lake in such a manner that
it impairs the vision of, or confuses operators of watercraft. No lighting
in the area of the lake shall be installed or directed so as to affect
adjoining dock use areas or create a hazaid to navigation.
The LMCD board encourages all licensees to examine the intensity of their
lights from the water. Lights beaming significantly beyond the dock use
area should be adjusted by redirecting the beam, adding a shield if redirect'
ing the beam does not correct the beam intensity and possibly reducing the
light source wattage. This cooperation is urged to eliminate the need for
more restrictive lighting regulations.
License Year
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66, Cnstal Bay, Minnesota S5323
Phone 473-7357
Date application sent to Marina 2 2-^0 Date application returned to Cit>-
ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION -
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43. Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is
unlavxlul for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained
a license therefor from the City .
PLEASE COMPLETE .ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH
1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
BUSINESS INFORMATION
1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NA.ME
J
M\nr)p-fortK.ck RoQ-f u3ofKx
Street Address Bi. Lii
Mdilini: Address___________________
, Mn. 5SJ*ih
Manna Phone V73 ~ 1305
OWNERSHIP/OPERATION
Office Phone <773 - 7Jos
Fee Owner (if different than above) MPitO ci~ C:teAv<nA^ .
Add.'^ess 5vAme.-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone
BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item)
individual ownership ____ partnership corporation
List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title:
ler dlool/f/___________C.F'O _____________
I Fk<(c\\Pr<^;df’/vF
Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation:
____________________________________~7rw^
List the minimum number of employees on duty when the mraina is open to the public
during the boating season:
I dock attendants j. repair or service personnel
others available for sales/public information, etc. 2 0
Page 1 of 5
List everv- short or long term business occupant of Jie propert>- other than the Business
noted above:
5.
4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered):
Principal Uscs
in-water slip rental
sales of boals/motors/trailers/
marine accessores
boat repair and servicing
on-land boat storage
winter __summer
marine fuel sales
sale of bait and fishing tackle
fnnHitional Uses (Conditional Vs£
permit is Required}
____ boat club
public boat launching, on-demand
public boat launching, transient
charter boat port-of-call
caretaker dwelling unit /
Accessory Uses
____ head pumpout
____ fishing tournament site
____ sale of pre-packaged food
____ dive shop
____ clubhouse (for slip or
boat club customers)
____lessons/teaching
____ boat rental
____ sailboard sales'rental
____iceboat sales'rental
____ ice fishing tackle sales
cross-countrv ski sale/rental
BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items):
open all year
List proposed hours of operation: dock access
retail sales
& service
open during boating season only
(a AM to 13. PM
AM to In PM
MARINA SECURITY is provided by;
CARETAKER living on site? _____fcjoV---------------------------------------
uffhe^mai^f^;^of boats in each categor)-. Each slip, mooring or other space
acmallv used for storaue or keeping of boats or watercraft must be tndtcatcd and numbered on
the dock and site plan submined with this application
Owned Boats Spaces Boats
7. boats STORED IN THE WATER
(for lake use) .
a. At dock slips ------- ------- * — -------
Total Boats in Water _____ ____ -iti— ------ —T
Page 2 of 5
8.
9.
10.
11.
BOATS STORED ON L.AND FOR LAKE USE
a. Inside Buildings -------
b. Outside on Racks -------
c. Outside - other means ____
Toul Boats Stored on Land
for Lake Use ____
TOT.AL BOATS FOR LAKE USE
(Add 7 and 8) |IM
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER)
a. Transient boats (repair'service)
b. New boats for sale (inventorv')
c. Used boats for sale (inventor>’)
d. Other (list:___________________)
Total
IN
Inside Building Outside Building
1
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER)
Transient boats (repair/service)
Contract storage (customer's boats)
Inventory' (new & used boats)
Other (list: _________________J
Total
Inside Building
Total
Outside Building
a.
b.
c.
d.
OFF-STREpT parking REQUIREMENTS
12. SUMMER PARKING
a. Retail sales/service customers
8 spaces minimum (+l per each 800 s.t. over 1,000 s.f.)
b. Boating customers
6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x |H (line 9)] —
c. Launching ramp customers (day use)
10 spaces minimum per ramp =
d. Charter boat port-of-call
1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity
[gross charter capacity \ 0.33] =
e. Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d)
Total spaces available per attached parking plan
13. WINTER PARKING REQUIRED
a. 0.20 X (line I2e)
I-10
IQ-JD
Total
__ spaces
spaces
spaces
spaces
spaces
spaces
)*-{ spaces
Page 3 of 5
DOCK CONSTRIICTION
14. CHECK ALL THAT APPLY;
Permanent _____ Seasonal
__ Concrete
____ Metal
Foam
WoodPilings; _____
Decking; Wood
Flotation Method (if used);
De-icing normally used
Metal _____ Other____
Other
Barrels Other
I ICFNSE STANDAPPS AD\1SOR\i
Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall subject to the requirements and
performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license
Ipsnrnnce Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance
coverace for the duration ot the license period.
A.
B I icenseholder. The primary business operator on the propetty' shall be the
licenseholder. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all
businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondar> businesses shall not be
separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the
provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards.
Op.>r.-ition Stmdards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum
operation standards; .
1) Parkimi facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate tratlic or
parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian
traffic through neighboring property.
2)Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8;u0 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
3)Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7;00 a.m. to 10;00 p.m.
except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use
of premises stored boats.
4)
5)
The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage.
On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view-
obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site.
Parkin^ and on-land storage of boats, trailers materials and equipment shall
be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan,
which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license
application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally vanabl:
uses.
7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties.
Page 4 of 5
_____
Business Use Licen«;es Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning
district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning
district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license.
License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause
for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter.
ATTACHMENTS
TTie following must accompany this application:
1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of
the marina propertv' and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage
areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access
areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show-
all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for
the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of
winter storage and required winter parking spaces.
2. CERTIFICATE OF LI.\BILITY INSURANCE COVER.AGE for the duration of the license
period.
4.
Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION.
COMMERCIAL M.ARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City
fee schedule.
Initial Application $300.00 S__________
Renewal Application $200.00 S 300____
Late Fee (if not postmarked by
March 1) $100.00
lOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION S 300
RFVIFW PROCEDURE
WTien a complete appPcation is received, the City Council will review the license application and
will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5.
THF MARINA MAY OPFN FOR PUBLIC ITSE ONLY UPON .APPROVAL OF THE LICEN.SJE
BY THF CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono
City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of
Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any
reasonable time to perform safety^d co(^compliance inspections.
Authorized Signature_
Title Maoaa
Date
Relationship to Owner Hone.
Page 5 of 5
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Oe/aO/% 16:58:16
license - ona bub.
1 t 0.00
COWBCIflL WRINR LICENSE
1 8 200.00 200.00
0.00
SUBTOTALTAI
TOTAL SALE
RECEIVED
200.00
0.00
200.00200.00
CHANGE
CLfiXI 02 TRANS#
0.00
C *93 •08 / 30 / 95 • PAC76892 "lO-0 1
0120235
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANIES
Subsid>«ri€« of American Financial Corporation
sao walnut street . C incinnati . Ohio 4S202
ORIGINAL COPY
CG 74 00 (Ed. 11 85)
Policy No. PAC 768-92-30 * 01
BUSINESSPRO GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
DECLARATIONS PAGE
NAMED INSURED: MINNETONKA BOAT WORK, INC POLICY PERIOD:
07/01 /95 to 07/01 /96
LIMITS OF INSURANCE:
General Aggregate Limit (Other Than Products -
Completed Operations)
Products - Completed Operations Aggregate Limit
P-jrsonal and Advertising Injury Limit
Each Occurrence Limit
Fire Damage Limit
Medical Expense Limit
$ 1,000.000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 50,000
$ 5,000
Any One Fire
Any One Person
RETROACTIVE DATE (CG 00 02 ONLY): Coverage A of this Insurance does not apply
to "bodily injury" or "property damage" which occurs before the Retroactive
Date, if any, shown here: (enter date or "none" if does not apply)
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:
Form of Business: ( ) Individual ( ) Joint Venture ( ) Partnership
( X ) Organization (Other than Partnership or Joint Venture)
Pijsiness Description BOAT DEALER / MAR I NA OP E RAT I ONS
Location of All Premises You Own, Rent or Occupy:
PER SCHEDULE CP7201 ATTACHED
PREMIUM:
Code
Classification No.
•
P r «mi um
Basis
Rates Advance Premium
Pr /Co All Other P r /Co /.II Other
PER SCHEDULE
CG7401 ATTACHED
• (a) A dm1s s i o n s ; ( b
(e) Payrol1; (f) T<
) Area; (c) Ea:
Dtal Cost; (g)
: h; Id) G r c
Units; (h )
) s s Sales;
1 Other
1k
Premium shown is payable: $
$ PER I L7001
Total Advance Premium $ 23,800
. . . . at inception;
AND ENDORSEMENTS applicable to all Coverage Parts and made part of this
policy at time of issue are listed on the attached Forms and Endorsements
ScheduIe CG 88 01 (11/85).
BUSINESSPRO (Reg. U.S. Pat. Off.)
CG 74 00 (Ed. 11/05) PRO (Page 1 of 1)
93 PRS 003095
INSURANCE COMPANIES
MARINA OPERATORS LIABILITY CLAUSES
Attached to and forming part of Policy No. C3MH 7388904-01 of the American National Fire Insurance Company
1. In consideration of the payment of premiun and subject to the limits of liability, exclusions, conditions and other
terms of this policy, this Company agrees to pay on behalf of the Insured, all suns which the Insured shall become
obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him (them) by law for physical loss of or damage to
private pleasure watercraft and their motors including boats, trailers and other appurtenances, the property
of others, while in his (their) care, custody or control at the premises scheduled in Clause #2 for any of the
operations indicated below:
COVERED A. Repair, alterations or maintenance;
COVERED B. Land storage;
COVERED
NOT COVERED
COVERED
C. Mooring at slips, spaces or buoys;
D. Hauling out or launching not in connection with operation A. or B.;
E. Fueling and miscellaneous servicing of a transient nature.
2. This Insurance covers only in respect of covered operations only at the following premises, including adjacent
moorings and while being shifted or moved by land or water within 25 miles of such premises in connection with
covered operations.
The maximua liability arising out of any one loss, accident or occurrence at any scheduled premise shall not exceed
the amount(s) listed below;
LIMIT OF LIABILITY LOCATION
A. $1,000,000.
B. INCLUDED
C. INCLUDED
D. INCLUDED
294 E. GROVE LANE; WAYZATA, MN
704 SEVENTH STREET; DELANO, MN
LOTS 1&2, SEC 11-117-23; ORONO, MN
RIDGEDALE MALL; PLYMOUTH, MN
3. This insurance covers only for the excess over and above >1.000. of the aggregate of claims, losses, legal fees and
expenses under all operations covered by this policy arising out of any one loss, accident or occurrence.
4. The Irtsured, by the acceptance of this policy, warrants and agrees to keep a complete and accurate record of all
gross receipts of operations covered by this policy, which record shall be open for examination by representatives
of this Company at all times during business hours at any time during the currency of this policy period and for
three years after the final termination of this policy, for purposes related to the premiun or subject matter of
this insurance.
J
5. This insurance may be cancelled by the Insured or by this Company by giving ten (10) days notice in writing. Notice
to the Insured shall be : tn his (their) last known address.
6. It is hereby expressl/ str.xi and agreed that this insurance does not cover against nor shall any liability
attach hereunder for:
BOARD MEMBERS
Douglas E Babcock
Chair. Tonka Bay
To^ Reese
Vice Chair. Mouno
Joseph ZwaK
Secretary Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer. Shorewood
Kent Dahlen
Minnetonka Beach
Bert Foster
Deephaven
Gretchen Maglich
Minnetonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
Craig MoHet
Victoria
Craig Nelson
Spring Park
Eugene Partyka
Mmnetrista
Paul Stark
Excelsior
Herb J. Suehh
Woodland
Orono
o
60*. P#cyc*t^ Co^itt^i
30*. Pas! Wisti
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 E*S” WAVZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160 • WAY2ATA, MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEPH0^4E 612 473 7033
G. Alan Willcutt EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
April 3, 1996
Mr. Todd Nelson
Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono)
294 E. Grove Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dear Todd:
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of
Directors has approved your multiple dock license
for the 1996 season. The license and the approved
site plan with stipulations, if any, are enclosed.
Any additional changes will require a new license.
Please review the 10/12/95 memo enclosed that
outlines the proper number of watercraft that can
be stored at a multiple dock facility. LMCD staff
fully intends to enforce this section of the Code
during the 1996 season.
Feel free to call me If you have any questions.
Your cooperation in complying with LMCD Code is
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Administrative Technician
end: license, site plan, 10/12/95 memo
cc: City of Orono
No. ■ 96-48
tMCO
^ 1613.75
20R.5 WSU
114 BSU Units
MULTIPLE DOCK AND MOORING
AREA LICENSE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
County of Hennepin, Slate of Minnesota ss.
WHEREAS,MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS, INC. (ORONO)
1449 Shoreline Drive, City of Orono
has paid the sum of Sixteen Hundred Thirteen and _75/10p_*_s- - - - -DOLLARS
lo the Treasurer of said LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT as required by the Ordinances of said
District and complied with all the requiremenu of said Ordinances necessary for obuining this License;
NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the Board of Directors of said District and by virtue hereof, the said
MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS, INC. hereby licensed and authorized to
operate a multiple dock subject to existing and future density policies and regulations adopted by the District’s Board
of Directors Per 4/14/99 site plan; subject to order of 9/26/90
for a sppr-Tnl lironspr subject to amended amenities
approved on P/9/95._______________________________________________
for ihc period of the 1996 Dock season and
ending PecOlTiber 31 19 96 jyj^jeet to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances.
Violations of the provisions of the District’s Code of Ordinances
arc punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days or imposition of a fine of not more than S700, or both.
Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this
13th ^ , March . p. ,9_96
Attest AIcuttChairman Douoflas F • Babcock
LIGHTING OF MULTIPLE DOCKS
License is subject to LMCD Code Sec. 2.03# Subd. 12# which states in part
"Dock lighting shall not be directed toward the lake in such a manner that
it impairs the vision of# or confuses operators of watercraft. No lighting
in the area of the lake shall be installed or directed so as to affect
adjoining dock use areas or create a hazard to navigation.
The LMCD board encourages all licensees to examine the intensity of their
lights from the water. Lights beaming significantly beyond the dock use
area should be adjusted by redirecting the beam# adding a shield if redirect
ing the beam does not correct the beam intensity and possibly reducing the
light source wattage. This cooperation is urged to eliminate the need for
more restrictive lighting regulations.
License Year
CITY OF ORONO 2 4 1996
P.O. Box 66, Cr> stal Bay, Minnesota J5323
Phone 473-7357
Date application sent to Marina 2- -2 -‘‘i C-__Date application returned to Cit> --------------
ANNUAL <"0^t^fFROIAL MARINA LICENSE APPUCATIOji -
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - licensgd..,R^quired. It is
unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained
a license therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
^jj^CHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CIT\ CLERK BY MARCH
1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
RII.SINFSS INFORMATION
I. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME
2.
00.1 Lots
Mailing m. C^VSfAL MN.
Marina Phone fd2-~ ^3 —
OWNERSHIP/OPERATION
Office Phone
35"/7
Phone ^ ~V
7
BUSINESS ORG.ANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ,
individual ownership ____ partnership corporation
List the name of each partner or corporate otticer and their title.
Name of the marina manager responsible for dadv operation:
GPilzy oe Ol^e <?^l L Df: SaaJTI^S
List the minimum number of Employees on duty when the marina is open to the public
duijxig the boating season:
dock attendants ^ repair or ser\ ice personnelb
'V others available for sales/public information, etc.
Page 1 of 5
List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business
noted above:
4.
5.
PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered):
Principal Uses
in-water slip rental
sales of boats/motors/trailers/
marine accessories
_____ boat repair and servicing
)C on-Iand boat storage
^ winter __summer
"yC marine fuel sales
sale of bait and fishing tackle
A
Conditional Uses fCon ditionnl Use
P^riftit is Reauiredl
boat club
public boat launching, on-demand
public boat launching, transient
charter boat port-of-call
caretaker dwelling unit
Accessory Uses
')C head pumpout
fishing tournament site
sale of pre-packaged food
dive shop
clubhouse (for slip or
boat club customers)
lessons/teaching
boat rental ,
sailboard sales/rental
____iceboat sales/rental
ice fishing tackle sales
cross-countrv ski sale/rental
BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items):
open all year ____ during boating season only
L^ist proposed hours of operation: dock access 8 ANI to__2—
ANI to PM
retail sales
& service
6. NLARINA SECURITY is provided by:
CARETAKER living on site? fX) 0_________________-—— --------------—
SI IPS AND BOAT UNITS
List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, moonng or other space
actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on
the dock and site plan submitted with this application.
Company
Owned
7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER
(for lake use)
a. At dock slips __/__
Total Boats in Water (
Rental Rental Slips/Other Total
Boats Spaces Boats
uP
0
bb X 7f
JJ-(oL 7-Ai-
Page 2 of 5
8.BOATS STORED ON L.AND FOR LAKE USE
Inside Buildings ____ ___L.
Outside on Racks ____ ____
Outside - other means ____ ____
Total Boats Stored on Land
for Lake Use ____ ____
a.
b.
c.
9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE
(Add 7 and 8)7?
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER)
Transient boats (repair/service)
New boats for sale (inventory)
Used boats for sale (inventory)
Other (list:__________________)
Total
Inside Building Outside Building
a.
b.
c.
d.
V,'/S-o
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER)
a. Transient boats (repair/sen-'ice)
b. Contract storage (customer's boats)
c. Inventory (new & used boats)
d. Other (list: ________________
Total
Total
Inside Building Outside Building.
•? 7 -
)
Total
OFF-STRFFT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
12.
a.
SUMMER PARKING
Retail sales/service customers
8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.t. over 1,000 s.f.) —
Boating customers
6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] —
Launching ramp customers (day use)
10 spaces minimum per ramp =
Charter boat port-of-call
spaces
b.57spaces
c.spaces
d.
e.
I space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity
[gross charter capacity x 0.33] = *') i/-
Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) \—
Total spaces available per attached parking plan
spaces
spaces
/ -j spaces
13. WINTER PARKING REQUIRED
0.20 X (line 12e)a.paces
Page 3 of 5
DOCK CONSTRUCTION
14. CHECK ALL THAT APPLY:
Permanent ____ Seasonal
Piltngs: __Wood ________ Concrete
____ Metal
Foam
Decking: vX Wood
lion Me{iiod (i
__ De-icing normally used
Metal ____ Other ___
Other ________
Barrels OtherFlotation Method (if used): ____
I.ICENSE STANDARD S ADVTSORy
Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and
performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license
standards: .. ^
^ tn^iimnrp Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance
coverage for the duration of the license period.
B. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the
licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any anc all
businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary’ businesses shall not be
separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in confomiance with the
provisions ot the B-2 zoning district standards.
Q npprntinn St.andards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum
operation standards: ,
1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate trattic or
parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestnan
traffic through neighboring property.
2)
3)
Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or pnvate use
of premises stored boats.
The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage.
On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view
obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site.
6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall
be lirnited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan,
which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license
application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable
uses.
7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties.
Page 4 A 5
4)
5)
Business Use T.icensp*; T.imitcH tn R-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning
district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning
district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license.
T.icense Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause
for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter.
ATT.4CHMENTS
The following must accompany this application;
1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of
the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage
areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access
areas' fencins ard landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show
all existinc facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for
the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of
winter storage and required winter parking spaces.
2.CERTIFICATE OF LL^BILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license
period.
Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION.
4. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City-
fee schedule.
Initial Application @ S300.00 S------------
Renewal Application @ $200.00 ^ ----
Late Fee (if not postmarked by-
March 1) $100.00 .
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ ___
RFVIFW PROCEDURE . j
WTien a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application an
will tliercafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5.
THF martna v (av opfn FOR PimUC USE ONI V UPON APPROVAl, QF THT; LICENSE
pv THE CITY COUNCIL.
-4
City of Orono
P.O. Box £fiCrystal Bay, W 55323 (612)473-7357
02/14/% 11:22:46
LICENSE - OBCR BUS.
• B 0.00
L^ocrciai Marina License
1 9 200.00
0.00
200.00
SUBTOTAL
TAX
TOTAL SALE
RECEIVED
200.00
0.00
200.00
200.00
CHAIGE
CLERK! 02 TRANS# 692
0.00
FEB-12-1996 15:46 Ot-IT(^ CORP./MSIA 612 922 1006 P.02
A««R». .-,L„
' V i .* *.*>; ^ ' 7:- t v. '■* ;. “■. V ;• ';. • ■ 02/12/96
* • » aw ' aVh a ' «*« a »■.■> .^aa .a .a^aa a^'.*1 _________ ____::_
NStA. tno
6600 Frmc0 Av» South
Sidli 414
Edbia MN $5436
1H8 COmnCATl » t^Oio as a matter op INWfftftTlON ONLY AMD
CONFERS NO HIQKra UPON THE CERRF1CATE HOLDER THS CERTIFICATE
DOES NOT AMEND, EXTWO OH ALTER THE COVERAQE AFPOROEO SY THE
PCXJCIES BB QW.
COMPLIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPAr<v a
COMPAT^V Q
Qfvat American twranoo
Stfof^ World
Yacht Club. )n&
P O. BW 176
Ciy^ ^UN 55323
ccmfiM
lt :-?
COVPANY
iTTER
c
D
COVP4f.Y p
‘ ' • .a.-;*., y ; ^W’v3:Cr"^Trr:rvVK;; -i->'‘-
TO CStTiFY'tfUf *fS*'^l6$$*t)V{S$U*>WEUir60 ‘8i6^ * ^ • ' ..
INDICATO. N07ATWSTAN01NG ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR OONOmON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER OOCUME n T WITH RESPECT TO V^>^ICH THIS
CERTlPlCATi MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTA'N. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREiN IS SUBJECT TO AU THE TERMS
EXaUSICNS AND CONOlTlOf4S OF SUCH POLICIES UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS
)
R TYPE OF MEURANCf
.aoaULUABUTY
X : OOMM0OAL GENERAL LABnjTV
PCUCY NUMBER
PAC7317715
POLICY ffESUTTVE
DATE
03/01/96
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE iMMCDYYI uurrs
03it)iy97
!^Z CLAIMS VA06 I X OCCUR
• WNEirs A ooNTfucTorrs ppct
SEN*?^AL A3Q*«1A75
VMoitCTscDvyw Asa
7Ssd?iAL A ADV. INAIRY
EACH OCCL^ENCi* “
ORE CAVUGE i/V7 on* Pffj
^•11 Ml
MED expense (Any Cf>4 pifion)$000
AUTOMOBEf UABtL/TY
r ANY ALTO
y- •
Aa OWNED At-liS
SQCOULSD AUTOS
HRED AUTOS
NCNOWNEO AL^OS
OARAGE UABUfY
EXCESS LiABILITY
, LV3RCLLA roa«
? OTHER Than UABAIUA K‘M
a'UBiNEO SiNOlB
JUT
BOOaY rxiURv
;Pnt p«ion)
BC3ILY irULp-V
iPNY ifiWJ)
PRO<>ERTV 5*UflCB
eV>* OCa^L’ic*
AcipiGATE
worars OOMPBOATVM
AND
Elff’LDYERS' LUaXJTY
STMLTOflYJUTS -V... ‘ ^V?* :• .
EAO ACOCSNT
C-ttASS . PC’JCY uJlf““'
biSlASE VckH'CMPtOYES
* <al • 6 > *
I
T
; OTHER
^ . Uarina Opantors
■ m m • •
OMH7003817 (mm (m\in Uab%/•’llM
WmCH OF OPERAT10faU)CATlONaVB4ICL£SffiPeClAL rriMS
.. ..... ----------------------- . . .....-cX-^BVewrte'Tiig ...... • ...............
City of Ofww
Albv MHia GofhOn
2750 KiOy Pvicway
Orw
yCORDt^;p^).. _
MN
E>pibaticn o*rs THtasoi', the issuing Xmp*ny wu feNOgavCR to
M*H__90 CAYS VVOITTPJ NOT08 TO TK* CI"T;rca T| HOIOSH NAMED TO TVS
LEH-. Birr EAILURE TO MAIL SUCK NOnCf $HAU. IMP09E NO 06U0AT10N OR
UAffUTf 0? A.NY KINO UPON THE COMPANY. lT$ AGENTS OR RIPRiSeGTAnvES
5S3S6
; •“-# -
.: a .r fj'l.
MIchaM B«1» C‘
TOTAL P.02
BOARD MEMBERS
Douglas E Batxrock
Chaif Tonka Bay
Tor^ Reese
V ce Cha r. Mound
Josepn Zwak
Secretary Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer. Shorewocd
Kent Dahlen
Minnetonka Beach
Bed Foster
Deephaven
Gretchen Maglich
M nnetonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
Craig Mollet
Victoria
Craig Nelson
Spring Park
Eugene Partyka
Mmnetnsta
Paul Stark
Excelsior
Herb J Suerth
Woodland
Orono
6C** necyoeo Content
30* • Post Con»umer Waste
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
9C0 EAST WAV^ATA BOULEVARD SUITE 160* WAVZf-^A M NNESOTA 55291 • TELE=>H0NE 612 473 7C33
G, Alan Willcutt EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
April 3, 1996
Mr. Gary DeSantis
Sailors World Marina
P.O. Box 176
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Gary:
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of
Directors has approved your multiple dock license
for the 1996 season. The license and the approved
site plan with stipulations, if any, are enclosed.
Any additional changes will require a new license.
Please review the 10/12/95 memo enclosed that
outlines the proper number of watercraft that can
be stored at a multiple dock facility. LMCD staff
fully intends to enforce this section of the Code
during the 1996 season.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions.
Your cooperation in complying with LMCD Code is
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Gre^ry S. Nybeck
Administrative Technician
end: license, site plan, 10/12/95 memo
cc: City of Orono
No. 9f-61 C^J
4mcO
$ 1,265.00
16 2 WSIT
7 9 BSU Units
MULTIPLE DOCK AND MOORING
AREA LICENSE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ss.
VVIIEREAS SAILORS WORLD MARINA & YACHT CLUB, INC., c/o Gary
’ DeSantis
1955 Shoreline Drive, City of Orono_________________
has paid the sum of Twelve Hundred Sixty-Five and No/100 *s__________DOLLARS
lo the Treasurer of said LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT as required by the Ordinances of said
District and complied with all the requiremenu of uid Ordinances necessary for obuining this License:
NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the Board of Directors of said District and by virtue hereof, the said
SAILORS WORLD MARINA & YACHT CLUB. INC. is hereby licensed and authoriied to
operate a multiple dock subject to existing ano future density policies and regulations adopted by the District's Board
of Directors Per 3/23/91 site plan; subject to Varianrp Ordpr of_ _ _
4/27/88, with deicinq on slips 65-68 conducted to fully_ _ _ _
protect the winter public access^^_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _
NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE 1;3 density, 226* of lakeshore frontage.
for the period of the 1996 Dock----------------------------------------------------------------------season and
ending DecOPnber 31 19 96 5y|yject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances.
Violations of the provisions of the District’s Code of Ordinances
are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days or imposition of a fine of not more than S700. or both.
Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this
13th
Attest
wuti\c Direct
March a.D.
tG.Aj>6n VlllcuttCh.iirmnn Douglas F. Babcock
LIGHTING OF MULTIPLE DOCKS
License is subject to LMCD Code Sec. 2.03, Subd. 12, which states in part —
"Dock lighting shall not be directed toward the lake in such a manner that
it impairs the vision of, or confuses operators of watercraft. No lighting
in the area of the lake shall be installed or directed so as to affect
adjoining dock use areas or create a hazard to navigation.
The LMCD board encourages all licensees to examine the intensity of their
lights from the water. Lights beaming significantly beyond the dock use
area should be adjusted by redirecting the beam, adding a shield if redirect
ing the beam does not correct the beam intensity and possibly reducing the
light source wattage. This cooperation is urged to eliminate the need for
more restrictive lighting regulations.
I
License Year /‘/f
CITY OF ORONO ^ 5 1996
P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 ___
Phone 473-7357
Date application sent to Marina ■7- 2 / (y Date application returned to City
ANNUAL rOMMTRCTAL MARINA LICENSE APPUCATIQ^j; -
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Liggnsed Required, It is
unlawful for anv persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained
a license therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, .AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY M.ARCH
1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
RII.STNFSS INFORM.ATION
1. BUSINESS OR TR.ADE NAME
Street .Address fO ^
Mailing Address —> '^£\—
Marina Phone \ ~~ _______ Office Phone
O W'N E RS H1 P/OP E RAT ION
Fee Owner (if different than above)_________________
.Address
Phone
BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item)
____ partnershipindividual ownership corporation
List the na.me of each pa.'-tner or corporate office; and^ their title:
Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation:
List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public
during the boating season*
' dock attendants repair or service personnel
^ others available for sales/public information, etc.
Page 1 of 5
List evers- short or long term business occupant of the propert>- other than the Business
noted above:
4. PRINCIP*-\L BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered):
Principal Uses
in-water slip rental
^ sales of boatS/ motors/trailers^
marine accessories
jL boat repair and serv icing
y on-land boat st(^age
winter X summerAmarine fuel sales
sale of bait and fishing tackle
Conditional Uses (Conditional Use
Permit is Required)
boat club
public boat launching, on-demand
public boat launching, transient
charter boat port-of-call
y caretaker dwelling unit
5. BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items):
Accessory Uses
X head pumpout
fishing tournament site
sale of pre-packaged food
dive shop
X clubhouse (for slip or
boat club customers)
lessons/teaching
boat rental
sailboard sales/rental
_____iceboat sales/rental
ice fishing tackle sales
cross-country ski sale/rental
V open all year
List proposed hours ot operation; dock access
retail sales
& service
open during boating season only
AM to ^
AM to%
6.MAJUNA SECURIIY' is provid^ by: -----------
PM
PM
CARETAKER living on site'
Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total
Boats Spaces Boats
sf IPS AND BOAT UNlTij
List the maximum number of boats in each categor>-. Each shp, moonng or other space
actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on
the dock and site plan submitted with this application.
Company
Owned
7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER
(for lake use)
a. At dock slips —I—
Total Boats in Water __^__
Page 2 of 5
%<
8.
9.
10.
11.
BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE
a. Inside Buildings
b. Outside on Racks
c. Outside - other means
Total Boats Stored on Land
for Lake Use
TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE
(Add 7 and 8)
X
i
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER)
Transient boats (repair/service)
New boats for sale (inventory)
Used boats fi^sale (inventory)
Other (list: -----------)
Total
Inside Building
a.
b.
c.
d.
OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER)
a. Transient boats (repair/service)
b. Contract storage (customer’s boats)
Inventory (new & used boats)
Inside Buildine
c.
d.Other (list:
Total
)
32.
16?
Outside Building
ID
Itx iJa.
Total
Outside Building
\0
nFF-STRFF.T PARKING REQUIREMENTS
12. SUMMER PARKING
a. Retail sales/service customers
8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f over 1,000 s.f.)
b. Boating customers
6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x___(line 9)] =
c. Launching ramp customers (day use)
10 spaces minimum per ramp =
d. Charter boat port-bf-call
I space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity
[gross charter capacity x 0.33] =
e. Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d)
Total spaces available per attached parking plan
13. WTNTER PARKING REQUIRED
a. 0.20 X (line 12e)
iOi?
Total
spaces
spaces
spaces
2-1
spaces
spaces
spaces
spaces
Page 3 of 5
DOCK CONSTRI CTION
14. CHECK. ALL THAT APPLY:
*2^ Pemanent ____ Seasonal
Pilings: A Wood ____ Concrete
Decking: ^ Wood ^ . Metal
Flotation Method (if used): ____ Foam
^ De-icing normally used
Metal ____ Other____
Other
Barrels Other
LICENSE STAND.ARDS ADVISORY
Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and
performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the folio -ving business use license
standards:
A. (n.;nrnnre Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance
coverage tor the duration of the license period.
B.
C.
T irenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the
licenseholder. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all
businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary' businesses shall not be
separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the
provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards.
Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following mmimum
operation standards:
1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or
parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian
traffic through neighboring property.
2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
3) Retail sales and ser\ice shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m.
except as necessary' to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use
of premises stored boats.
4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage.
5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view
obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site.
6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall
be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan,
which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license
application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable
uses.
7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties.
Page 4 of 5
Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning
district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning
district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license.
License Revocation. Failure Jo adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause
for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter.
ATTACHMENTS
The following must accompany this application:
1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PL/\N indicating the boundaries of
the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all strucmres, storage
areas, docks, slips, buoys, launcliing ramps, g:is pumps and tanks, parking areas, access
areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show-
all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for
the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of
winter storage and required winter parking spaces.
CERTIFICATE OF LI.ABILITY INSURANCE COVER.\OE for the duration of the license
period.
Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION.
COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City
fee schedule.
Initial Application @ S300.00 $_«_______
Renewal Application @ S200.00 $
Late Fee (if not postmarked by
March 1) SI00.00 ^ *
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLIC.ATION $__^
REVIEW PROCEDURE
WTien a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and
will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5.
THE. MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PITILTC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE
BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono
City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
C^*l Ba^m 55323 {612)473-7357
03/16/%
LICENSE - ODCii BUS.
12:17:17
1 %300.00 300.00
N»THSH[»{E NWINH DOCK LIC
1 6 0.00 0.00
SUBTOTAL 300.00TAX0.00TOTAL SALE 300.00
lECEIte 300.00
CHANGE 0.00
CLERK! 03 TRANS! 1107
I
NORTH SHORE MARINA
471-2628
March 10, 1996
Mike Gaffron
City of Orono
Mar I 4 X996
Dear Mike;
1 apologize for my delinquency in getting the information together for application of a
conditional use permit. As you may or may not know, 1 have some other investors in the
Marina and 1 have not been successftil in selling them on the idea of the conditional use.
Unfortunately, one of them is out of town until the middle of April; but I think maybe the
best w ay for me to proceed with them is to schedule a meeting with all of us this time so
you can shed some light on why we need to change the way we are doing business.
If I remember correctlv, one of your main concerns was to be able to tie the conditional
permits into landscaping We are in total agreement that landscaping to create a buffer
zone between the marina and the neighbors is a common goal In our case, 1 believe the
argument could be made the other way; buffer the marina from the neighbors. I am
comfortable in locking up some kind of landscaping agreement with you as we have
discussed.
In closing, I believe that you have been most forthright in our discussions and it has been a
great help to get your input and goals on cleaning things up here at North Shore. Again, I
appreciate youi patience and would look forward to meeting with you in April sometime
to get this matter behind us.
Sincerelv
/ Rich Anderson
president North Shore Marina
r
ACORIK CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
raOOUCER'
NSIA, Inc
6600 Fnnoc Aw Soutti
Suili 414
Edini UN 5543$
isaue OATf
I 01/03M
*S'a matter 'of infohmation 'oni Iy and ■
MES^T^FNn^^lirS holder THIS CERTIFICATI
^CIK BBLW°’ ^ COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
COMPANIES affording COVERAGE
MSUREO
North Short Marina, Inc.
3222 North Short Drivt
Wayzata
COMPANY A
tniER ^
COMPANY n
LCTTER °
COMPANY p
LHTER ^
Initml Marina Underwnt
MN SS381
COMPANY
UTTER
COMPANY
Un£R
D
E
this is to certify that the POUOES OF‘lNSURANCE USTED eaOW'HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE'POLICY PERlOO'
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANOlfrG ANY REOUREMENT. TERM OR CONDITIOM OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPEa TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUOES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO AU THE TERMS
ExauSKDNS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUCIES UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CUIMS
00
LTR TYPE OF MauRANCE
GENERAL UA8MJTY
I X I commercial GENERAL UA8UJTY
I OWNERS 4 CONTRAaOPFS PROT
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR
POUCY NUMBER j POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE iMMOOkYY)
CWH612B01
>OUCY EXPtfUTCN
1 DATE iMMOOrrr)
~diyd3/97
AUT0M08EE UABlUTY
j’** ANY AUTO
I ^
AU OWNED ALfTOS
SCHEOUUO AUTOS
HREO AUTOS
NONOANED AUTOS
garage LiAStUTY
OICESS UAINUTY
! umbrelu form
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORFEJYS COMPENSATION
AND
tMrLCYERS UABUTY
OTHER
Prolaction & Indemnity
Marina Operalort
Owned Water Craft
CWH612801
CWH61260t
CWH612601
Lears
general aggregate
PRObuCTSCOMP/OP AGd
PERSONAL 4 ADV IHAJR y'
EACH OCCURRENCE
j FIRE DAMAGE (Any ant tot)
MED EXPENSE (Any ont ptraonl
OOMBINEO SINGLE
UMIT
t
800n.Y INJURY
(Pm pMSon)
B0CM.Y INJURY
(Pm aog MmV)
PROPERTY OAJWGE
EACMOCdWNCE
aggregate '’
J STATUTORY UMTS
£M>I ACClCENT
Disease • policy umt
DISEASE EACH EMPLOYEE
2000000
1000000
'll
Hi
50000
“ 5000
»11»• •
01/t)3;96
01/03/^
01/03/96
f items
01/03/97
01/03^7
oiAiSior
Any One AoctOoc
Any One Vessel/Aoct
Physical Damage
1000000
1000000
17000
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
Long Lake Suta Bank
1964 W. Wayzata Boulovaj j
Long Laka MN
ACORO 25-S (7/90)
55356
CANCELLATION ^
SHOULD AfiY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED KXJClES BE’CATiCELLED'BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WIU ENOEA'/Ofl TO
mail ------to DAYS WRIHEN WTlCE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHAU IMPOSE tiO OBUGATION OR
llAflIUTY OF ANY KINO UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES
OACORO CORPORATION 1990
03-14-1S9S 12: 3S'612 473 7033 LMCD P.Ol
UaCE HINNEtONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
U4C0 RACeipt #DOCK - RENEWAL
LicAn«« Y«ar 1996
renewal without chance APPLICATION
MULTIPLE 4/OR COMMERCIAL DOCK, AND LAUNCHING RAMP
_ _ _ _ _ _(Nana)
D<Lv
CK, AND LAUNCHING RAMP /
7iadr«..)— I TcltyT^ <“P>
certify that no change* are to be made in the doclc configurat^n or in
the number of boats atored for lake use, of the (Company Name)
SWto
in the City of riparian to Bay
during the 1996 eeason; that all information and attachment* on file
with the Dietrict for last year's application will be applicable to
the license being applied for; and that a new license will be obtained
from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District before making any
change.
Type of facility!
Number of Boat Storage Unite (BSU), for which you are licensed!
Number of boat* stored by use (enter number of BSU in each catego^)^^^
Bon4* lABse . Transient Use....
seJvioi work!.. 0« Stoeag.
Prlvat. u.e. .. . .
dec 1'
UM.C.D.
Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) computation schedule (enter number of
BSU and WSU in each slip size category):
BSU SLIP SIZE CATEGORIES WSU
rsS I i.5 SIS lu? to I iv Sid”. I ll‘
BSU 0 2 WSU (up to & incl. 12' wide x 32’ long)
IIS 11-" SIS \Zto I illi: ii: Sil: I i-ll
psu 0 4 WSU (over 16' wide x 48' long)
WSU
WSU
WSU
WSU
WSU
WSU
(36 BSU Total....Total WSU for which you are licensed WSU
03-14-1936 12:29 612 473 7033 LMCO P.02
lAKE hlWETONKX CONSIRVATIOH DISTRICT- '
Dock Renowol Application 1996 Page 2
FEE CALCULATION;
Base Fee. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . .. $ 50.00
Humber of WSU x $7.so . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- $
TOTAL LICENSE FEE (Non-refundable). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- $
THE APPLICATION IS DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1995.
You may pay in full, or submit a deposit of 20% of the license fee
($100 minimum) with your application ON OR BEFORE 12/1/95.
PAYMENT SCHEDULE;
Total License foe paid with application $ __ _ _
Deposit of 20% of license foe (or $100 minimum) $ ^
LATE FEE SCHEDULE t
If application is received AFTER 12/1/95, a late foe of
10% of the 20% deposit amount (or $10 min.) must be added._ _ _ _
* or *
If application is received AFTER 12/31/95, a late fee of
20% of the 20% deposit amount (or $20 min.) must be added*_ _ _ _
a or *
If application is received AFTER 2/28/96, a late fee of
30% of the 20% deposit amount (or $30 min.) must be added._ _ _ _
* or *
If application ia received AriER 3/31/96, a late fee of
30% of the FULL LICENSE FEE AMOUNT must be added... . . . .______
TOTAL LICENSE FEE DUE FOR 1996 $ 2o9^
AMOUNT PAID WITH APPLICATION $ _
BALANCE DUE ON OR BEFORE 3/31/96; $ Itol7^y0
t
I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments
hereto are true and corract. I understand that any license issued may
bo revoked by the District for violation of the UfCD Code. I agree to
reimburse the District for any legal, surveying, engineering,
inspection, maintenance, or othsr expenses required that are incurred
by the District in assuring compliancs with the LNCD Code under which
this application would be granted. I consent to permitting officers
and agents of the District to enter the premises at all reasonable
times to investigate and to d^ermine whether or not the Code of the
District is being comp^^ ^ j ^
Authorized Signature ^___ _ _ Title
Relationship to Own«
Return to; Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Suite 160, Nayzata MN 55391 473-7033
a
I .
• •
*
M &
3 u> I f §
7^ ^ I ^ JK ^ U <7 ^ I
iH 5«« c» N5 J*> (A
I H
5 zr
r.'>
u
\J\
O
r •« »
•. I
-5%5-5ff i -
I IT'
*W «p
it.•
••
i m
1 «
1 •
‘ST* #grA jp
:\
FTT.'^^oil ^I ..'^- ,:^“t/
;''3'feLBSV
- I .TV
r" •» ^ •:-^
! • ,:.\
• »• I
• t
4 4
: i($.
I • ;- -n. .<
V* /
1
VJ
faiiViaiasteigKi'.^ ------
\
>
g ^ ^ 3
-V
X k
: I
• I
,;
-.r>-^'T&j;' ;
' • ruru.»3;^
r</ f4 -..•^1 It
; •
4f •
[A
4
T^
f'
.•t
’?
I
5o:t
S
^
::o
(/
c
f\
c5
^c^
£
V !|c 1^
? j\s
5
N» \
0
:u
t- 1
!&'J ^J\
tE> iS)iffk
[ 'J ^
MR
-I
>>
It)
O
!■
•>4 •>•
5r
^ (A A rv
:
•5
J;
^
>
§ ^vi
«r:
tll'«
IV
9
V P
N
I
vj 1
i?.
i ^s i? ■'
l>
io
I ^ 'w
0
Uj0
^ 5: w. 5
;3
• •
-i::
I.
1
•I.
;!i
•1’
h.
I-*
V. \
n I
\
. «r
•• •
— • .< • • •
•« I *
» »
:s;.
X
^CTTJACId UAI^
\ I
I
• I
•'N.
I
l-Uao ccvti^ . CtA. 1 H15 r'l«> ’
/)-7s* :
r>
V
f t/ - SO
(Kop^evit, miners
• • • r• h
I •
f
w I
• w I
Z.T —
»•
J/' -»• ,.*
1
V
’•
A* • » - .
• • •• ••■
rz&^:
Tf
I -----^--y -----
;.1
I
lo >
\?.^
> •♦
. •.
Liii
/y/zp'/ y . >^£J
/I ;;if • • ^• •,•-*/
1
1
I
• •,
TT*
•#})jC jT )V M /«0 f/H If 1
.• «.
f
.•
fl {t i<n (J ,'f <<n yt
• • 1•
I1 .
\ I
* I
•\
.• .
«.
•? ^
>• I I
• .* r-
'= so'
BOARD MEMBERS
Douglas E. Babcock
Cnatr Tonka Bay
Tom Reese
Viw**' Cnaj, Mound
Joseo"i Zwak
Secretary Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer. Shorewood
Kent Dahien
Minnetonka Beach
Bert Foster
Deephaven
Gretchen Maglich
Minnetonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
Craig Moiiet
Victona
Craig f4elson
Spring Park
Eugene Panyka
Mmnetrista
Paul Stark
Excelsior
Hero J Suerih
Wcxx3land
Orono
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
9C0 EAST \r;iYZATA BOU-EVARO SUITE 160 • WAYZATA MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEPHONE 612'473-7C33
G Alan Wiilcutl EXECUTIVE DiRECTOP
April 3, 1996
Mr. Richard Anderson
North Shore Marina
3222 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dear Richard:
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of
Directors has approved your multiple dock license
for the 1996 season. The license and the approved
site plan with stipulations, if any, are enclosed.
Any additional changes will require a new license.
Please review the 10/12/95 memo enclosed that
outlines the proper number of watercraft that can
be stored at a multiple dock facility. UfCD staff
fully intends to enforce this section of the Code
during the 1996 season.
Feel free to call me if you have any (questions.
Your cooperation in complying with LMCD Code is
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Gregory S. Nybeck
Administrative Technician
end: license, site plan, 10/12/95 memo
cc: City of Orono
60* • R#oc*«<3
30^» Post Co^sumtf Waste
2,090.00
No. 96-5^\
IMC^
272 WSU
16 5 BSU Units
MULTIPLE DOCK AND MOORING
AREA LICENSE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
County ol Hennepin^ Stale of Minnesota ss.
WHEREAS,NORTH SHORF NARINA, c/o Richard Anderson
3222 No. Shore Drive, City of Orono
has paid the sum »r Two Thousand Ninety and No/10.0_s- - - - - - - - -DOLLARS
to the Treasurer ol said LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERV ATION DISTRICT as required by the Ordinances ol uid
District and complied with all the requiremenu ol said Ordinances necessary lor obuining this License ;
NOW, THEREFORE, By order ol the Board ol Directors ol said District and by virtue hereol, the said
_______________NORTH SHORE MARINA___________________{% hereby licensed ind auihorizcd to
operate a multiple dock subject to eaisting and luture density policies and regulations adopted by the District's Board
of Directors. Per 11/25/86 site oTanr subject to aoreentent with Count-
Ordcr of 9/12/86; to the stipulation of 9/26/RQ that the east
side oT the inain dock be sioned "Handitrapped Loadina,Si Unloading
Only**; with no overnight boat storaap in the P_tr^n6j-grefc—SllPS*
NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE 1:2 density, 3R6* of lakeshore frontage
1996 Dock season andfor the period ol the _
ending DecenhF>T~ 31 jq Q 6 subject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances
Violations of the provisions of the District's Code of Ordinances
are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days or imposiiion of a fine of not more than S"00. or both.
Given under my hand and the corporaie seal of the LAKE MINNETC^KA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this
2 7th March ^ D. 19 4^
______________________
I'Vciiioc Doecloy*’. Alai^ Wil^CUtt Chairm.m
Aliesi Dotfalas F. Babcock
LIGHTING OF MULTIPLE DOCKS
License is subject to LMCD Code Sec. 2.03, Subd. 12, which states in part
"Dock lighting shall not be directed toward the lake in such a manner that
it impairs the vision of, or confuses operators of watercraft. No lighting
in the area of the lake shall be installed or directed so as to affect
adjoining dock use areas or create a hazard to navigation.
The LMCD board encourages all licensees to examine the intensity of their
lights from the water. Lights beaming significantly beyond the dock use
area should be adjusted by redirecting the beam, adding a shield if redirect
ing the beam does not correct the beam intensity and possibly reducing the
light source wattage. This cooperation is urged to eliminate the need for
more restrictive lighting regulations.
C0UNCLMEET1NG
MAY 2 8 1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
OTYOPOilONO
DATE: May 22. 1996
ITEM NO:
Department Approval:
Name
Title
Item Description:
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
/
Lowry Woods Access Easements
A memo to the Park Commission regarding access to the Lowry Woods open space area is
attached. The memo recommends a pedestrian access be provided to the Lowry Woods Nature
Area at a location with the least impact on adjacent properties. The Park Commission has
recommended that easements be acquired to provide for pedestrian access at this location. A
map showing the approximate location of the access easements is attached.
Staff recommends a 20 foot w ide easement beginning at the edge of the County Road 84 right-
of-way then running through the triangular parcel and into the Lowry Woods property. This will
require easements from two property owners. The total area of the easements required would
be a maximum of 3,000 square feet. The cost of the easements should be somewhere between
$1.00 per square foot and $2.00 per square foot. Staff requests authorization to approach the
affected property owners to negotiate the purchase of the easements at a cost not to exceed
$6,000. The easements will be brought to the Council for final approval.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to authorize staff to negotiate the purchase of access easements to the Lowry Woods
Nature Area at a cost not to exceed $6,000.
1
f ' , ' i ;-» 1 Ji.,. >
si H .
TO: Park Commission Members
FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator
DATE:May 2, 1996
SUBJECT: Access to Lowr>‘ Woods Open Space Area
There are two issues related to the provision of access to the Lowry Woods Open Space area.
One is the type of access to be provided (vehicular versus pedestrian). The second is how the
access is to be provided.
Type of Access
The decision on whether to provide vehicular or pedestrian access is based on who the city is
trying to serve. Are we trying to serve those who are within walking distance, those within
biking distance, or those within driving distance? Because there are a number of open space
nature areas in and around Orono; some providing nature walk experiences superior to what
would be provided by Lowry Woods, and also providing vehicular access and parking; it is not
critical that Lowry W'oods serve those who would come to the area by car. Therefore, it is not
necessary to provide for vehicular access and parking. Staff s recommendation is that the access
to be provided to Lowry Woods should be pedestrian access.
How to Obtain/Provide Pedestrian Access
The attached map shows the Lowry Woods area. Although there are theoretically at least four
possible access options, three of the options involve substantial use of a private road and/or
require substantial easements across private property. One option would require an easement
between two existing homes.
There is one option that has minimum impact on residential properties, requires a minimum
easement, and would have the minimum cost. This is the triangle of property adjacent to the
southwest comer of the Lowry Woods parcel.
It is staffs recommendation that a 20 foot easement for pedestrian access to the Lowry Woods
Open Space area be pursued with the owners of the triangular parcel.
COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 2 8 1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CITYOFOnONO
DATE: Mav 24, 1996
ITEM NO.:1
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse / V / /
Title City Administrator _________________1 // i
Item Description: Old Crystal Bay Road Tirail Upd^
Administrator Reviewed:
iP
Agenda Section:
Cit> Administrator ’s Report
The Old Cr>stal Bay Road trail construction plan, which is reflected in the 1996 budget, was
to complete the trail to Baker Park in 1996. This was to be funded from three sources:
1. Orono Park Fund.
2. DNR Grant.
3. Hennepin Parks.
Plans for trail construction in 1996 have been placed on hold due to the reluctance of Hennepin
Parks to enter into a cooperative agreement regarding the trail. Doug Bryant, the Hennepin
Parks Superintendent, has indieated this reluctance relates to concerns regarding the potential
impaet of a Highway 12 upgrade project on Baker Park. These coneems resulted from
information provided by Ma DO! to Hennepin Parks to advise them regarding various Highway
12 corridor alignment options and including a preliminary design of an interchange at County
Road 6 and Highway 12.
The potential for a northern (County Road 6) alignment for a Highway 12 upgrade and a major
interchange at Highway 12 and Count>’ Road 6 (Mn/DOT's initial design of which included a
m.ajor impaet on Baker Park) caused Doug Bryant and the Hennepin Parks Board to question
whether the trail project should move ahead prior to some assurances regarding efforts to limit
impacts on Baker Park. Since that time, the County Road 6 alignment option has been
eliminated and the Highway 12 and County Road 6 interchange has been redesigned to
eliminate or nearly eliminate any impacts on Baker Park.
A meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 28. to provide an opportunity for
representatives of Mn/DOT and Hennepin County DOT and myself to meet with Doug Bryant
and his staff to review current plans and designs related to Highway 12 and hopefully address
the concerns of Hennepin Parks. A report concerning this meeting will be provided at the
Council meeting.
I recently talked to the DNR trails grant coordinator regarding the $50,000 trail grant the City
has been awarded to clarify what the conditions are for the actual payment of the grant to the
City. The project as defined in the City's grant application included the full trail eonnection
to Baker Park. My question was whether the City could receive the $50,000 grant without
completing the full connection to Baker Park; i.e., bringing the trail to Highway 12 or to the
Request for Council Action continued
Pa^?2«2iO>r73
May 24, 1996
Map Showing the Completed and Uncompleted Sections of the Bike Trail
City facilities. The grants coordinator indicated it w'ould be possible for the Cit\ to revise the
project scope so that if the City moved ahead with a significant portion of the trail project in
1996 it could receive the grant funds.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion regarding a timeline for completion of the remaining segments of the Old Crvstal Bay
Road Bike/Hike Trail.
COUNCIL MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION may 2 8 1996
DATE: May
ITEM NO:
/
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Report
Item Description:
1995 Special Revenue Funds Budget Amendments, and Capital Projects Funds Cash Advance
To finalize the 1995 accounting year and financial reports, two Council actions are
requested. One is to amend the Special Revenue Funds e.xpenditure budgets; the other is
to approve a temporarv cash advance from the Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR)
Fund to the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Fund.
Special Revenue Funds Budget Amendments
The 1995 expenditures in the Special Revenue Fun*' ., i.e. Park Fund, Improvement and
Equipment Outlay Fund and Building Outlay Fund, include a number of expenditure
items that were approved by the Council but were not formally reflected in amendments
to the budget. The City's auditor recommends fomial budget amendments for these items
be approved by the City Council. The amendments are as follow:
Special Revenue Fund
Budget
Amendment
Park Fund:
Crystal Bay Playground
Highwood Nature Trail
Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail
$ 27,422
3,280
66,900 (a)
Improv, iuet-- and Equipment Outlay Fund:
Cent- '. ices Equipment $ 51,230 (b)
Building Outlay Fund:
Paving Public Works rear yard
City Facilities Signage
Door replacement
Utility payment drop box
Monitoring wells at old city hall site
375 (c)
1,100
1,900
567
15,900 (d)
r
I
kt *
(a) The budget amendment includes $18,000 to be reimbursed through the trail grant
cv.ofK: . fr-'Js , ^
(b) The ncrease in the equipment budget is due to the change over from LOGIS to the
Banyon in-house computer s> stem and related requirements, as authorized by
Council in April, 1995.
(c) The paving of the area behind the public works building was originally authorized
and budgeted at $7,500, however, the actual cost was $7,875.
(d) In 1995, payments totaling $15,900 were made to Braun Iniertec for work related
to the monitoring wells at the old city hall property. For the period 1993 through
1995 the total costs related to the wells were projected to be appro.ximately
$38,000. To date, due to additional activities required by the MFC A, the total
actual costs have been $44,555.84. The City has been reimbur.sed for $33,461 of
the e.xpenditures. The City will make a second applicat' "»n for reim'^ursement of
the remainder of the expenditures.
Temporary Cash Advance from the PIR Fund to the MSA Fund
During 1995 the City had several Municipal State Aid Fund (MSA) construction projects
in process which are being funded in whole or in part by municipal state aid from the
state. Two of these projects involved cooperative agreements with the Stale of
Minnesota, the Highway 12 Safety Improvement, and the Highway 12 and Willow Drive
Semaphore. The City was required to pay costs to the stale before we could receive our
share of the corresponding aid from the state. It is requested that the resulting temporary
cash deficit of $135,000 within the MSA Fund be funded by a temporar>' advance from
the PIR Fund. The advance will be reimbursed from the state aid received in 1996, and
will be cleared by May 31. 1996.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the 1995 budget amendments for the
Special Revenue Funds as presented; and approval and authorization of the temporary
cash advance effective 12/31/95 from the PIR Fund to the Municipal State Aid Fund in
the amount of $ 1 35,000, with the advance to be repaid \ 5/31/96.
, seconded by., to approve the 1995PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,__
Special Revenue Funds budget amendments as presented; and to approve and authorize a
temporaiy cash advance of $135,000 as of 12/31/95 from the PIR Fund Contingency
Account to the Municipal State Aid Fund, to be repaid from state aid payments received
by 5/3 1 /96. Ayes___, Nays____.
V* \ W ;l .vectinq
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: Mav
MAY 2d 1996
« 4 ^ ^\J
ITEM NO:/
Department Approval:
Name
Title
Administrator Reviewed:
; A.
Agenda Section:
Item Description:
Authorization for Submittal of an Application for an Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Loan or Grant
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is offering a program through which
cities can apply for a loan of up to $40,000 to fund projects, or a grant up to $10,000 to fund
studies to reduce Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) of clear water into the metropolitan disposal
system. To be eligible, a matching dollar commitment is required from the community for each
loan and grant offered. A key feature of the loan is that if the I/I project is annually certified
as being effective for a period of five (5) years after completion, annual repayment of the loan
will be forgiven.
In 1995, the city made substantial efforts to identify I&I problem areas in the Saga Hill area.
This has resulted in a substantial amount of l&I reduction work to be accomplished in 1996 and
future years. The budget does not include sufficient funding for all ot the work required. If the
city’s budgeted amount could be matched with a loan, the amount of work accomplished in 1996
could be doubled.
A resolution authorizing the city to submit a loan or grant application, and authorizing John
Gerhardson and Ron Moorse to serve as the subject matter contact regarding the application, is
attached for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of an application to the MCES for an HI
loan 01 grant and to authorize John Gerhardson and Ron Moorse to serve as subject matter
contacts for the application.
if
r ■
> 3 r'O
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION
FOR AN I/I REDUCTION LOAN OR GRANT TO THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MCES)
WHEREAS, the city of Orono currently experiences substantial infiltration and
inflow (I/I) into its sanitary sewer system; and
WHEREAS, Orono has initiated, in recent years, a comprehensive program to
reduce I/!, and
WHEREAS, the MCES is offering a program of loans and grants for I/I
reduction efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does
hereby authorize the submittal of an I/I reduction loan or grant application to MCES and also
does hereby authorize John Gerhardson and Ronald Moorse to serve as subject matter contacts
related to the grant.
Adopted by the Cii> C.'uncil this 28th day of May, 1996.
Edward J. Callahan, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
COUNCIL MEET1NQ
MAY 2 8 1996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
OTYOFOnONO
DATE: May 20. 1996
ITEM NO:N
Department Approval:
Name
Title
Item lOescription:
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
1997-99 Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement (CDBG)
As part of the city ’s participation in the CDBG program the city approves a Joint Cooperation
Agreement with Hennepin County, who administers the grant program. Currently, the
Community Development BU>ck Grant (CDBG) program and Joint Cooperation Agreement
provide a specific allocation of funds to small cities based on their needs determined through a
formula.
As part of the County’s review of the functioning of the CDBG program, it has changed the
method of allocating CDBG funds to small cities. The change is that rather than automatically
allocating funds to each city according to a formula, all of the funds that would be available to
the group of small cities will be pooled and made available to individual cities through a
competitive grant process. A list of the cities included in a consolidated pool for a competitive
grant process is attached. The impact on Orono is that rather than being guaranteed a grant of
appro.ximately $22,000, Orono will compete with a group of 27 cities for a pool of
appro.ximately $329,000 of grant funds.
The County objective in making this change is to provide for a more effective use of the CDBG
funds. Currently the cities in the pool group receive in the range of $800 to $27,000 as their
CDBG allocation. These amounts do not go ver> far in terms of having an impact on housing
needs. The pooling process would enable cities to plan more significant projects that meet key
needs in the community that could not be met, or at least could not be met effectively, in small
increments.
Because the cities will no longer receive individual allocations which enable individual funding
of human serv ices organizations. 15 of the total amount of pooled funds will be set aside for
human services. Because this is the level at which Orono funds human services from its grant
amount, it is not anticipated that there would be a significant change in funding for the human
services oreanizations that are currently funded by Orono.
The decision process regarding allocation of the pooled funds, including allocations to human
services organizations, will involve representatives of cities working with county staff to develop
review criteria and then serve on a review committee to make funding recommendations. It is
important that the grant review criteria enable a focus on the specific areas of need in each
community, rather than focusing on the overall economic picture of each community, to ensure
fair and reasonable allocation of the CDBG funds.
1 •
Request for Council Action continued
of^' ^
May 20, 1996
1997-99 Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement (CDBG)
Orono’s CDBG allocation has enabled it to fund, on a small scale, annual housing rehabilitation
projects. The consolidated pool will eliminate this guaranteed funding amount. However, with
some effort to identify housing rehabilitation needs, it may be possible for the city to be
successful in obtaining sufficient grant monies to accomplish in one year what under the current
system would have taken five or more years.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the execution of a joint cooperation
agreement between the city of Orono and Hennepin County tor continued participation in the
Urban Hennepin Community Development Block Grant program and authorizing the Mayor and
City Administrator to sign the cooperation agreement.
1997
PROJECTED PLANNING ALLOCATIONS
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COBG PROGRAM
Subtotal Formula Allocations
TOTAL
Hennepin Count/
Total Allocation
Based cn 1996 esb'inated allocadon
1997 allocation la not yet detannined
U'iccecxjuncnrAU.«^A
02.'t4,5*
1997
COMMUNITY ALLOCATION
Brooklya Park 505,812
Minnatonka 225,800
SubtotMi Bntm^rrmnt Communities 731,612
St Louis Park 284,033
Richfiald 250,935
Brooklyn Canttr 244,907
Edina 187,526
Edon Prairio 183,175
Naw Hopa 165,925
Hopkins 151,272
Mapla Grova 151,542
Crystal 138,626
Goldan Vallay 106,588
Robbinsdala 85,638
Champlin 77,469
Mound 65.638
2.093^74
’“Orantiassafi--49;54»
X Wayiata 27,751
Osseo 23,633
Corcoran 22,128
Orono 22,376
Dayton 20,369
Minnatrista 19,478
Rockford 19,145
Shorawood 17,460
St Anthony 16,437
% Excalsior 15,615
/ Indepandanca 14,649
Madina 13,971
\ Daaphavan 12,884
Spring Park 11,634
Hassan 11,331
\ Long Laka 10,248
Mapla Plain 9,990
St Bonifacius 7,545
\ Tonka Bay 7,266
\ Graanfiald 7,038
Rogars 4,366
Loratto 3,791
Hanovar 3,778
vJ Graanwood 2,968
^ Minnatonka Beach 1,709
\ Woodland 1,502
Medicine Laka 811
Suttots! Consolidated Pool
3,204.000
356,000
$3,560,000
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZLNG THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ORONO AND HENNEPLN COUNTY FOR
CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUTsITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, as the City of Orono, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect
a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United
States Department of Housing Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and
WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement
in order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development
Block Grant and HOME Programs.
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City and the County be terminated and a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between
the City and County be executed effective October 1, 1996, and that the Mayor and the City
Administrator be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council this 28th day ot May, 1996.
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Contract No.
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." A-2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55487,
and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING
UNIT," said parties to this Agreement tjch being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and made
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59:
WITNESSETH:
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that
COOPERATING UNIT shaic: ^ts authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities
with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY' to secure and administer Comn '.nit\' Development Block Grant
and HOME Invesmient Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined
and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties
mutually agree to the following terms and conditions.
COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that
it:
I.May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for
fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and
2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County .
I. DEFINITIONS
The deftnitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them:
A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42
U.S.C. 5301 et seq.).
B. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not
limited to 24 CFR Part 570.
C.
D.
"HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
"Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County' that has entered into a
cooperation agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County, which is
a party to each Agreement.
"Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or
documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is
developed by the COUNTY’ in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the
Community Development Block Grant program.
"Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is
certified by HUD to have a population of 50.000 or more people.
11. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to
undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities,
specifically urban renewal and publiciv assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out •’ ^e and other
eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the
COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community' Development Block Grant and HOME
appropriations for the Federal Fiscal Years 1997, 1998 and 1999 and from any program income generated from
the expenditure of such funds.
ni. AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1. 1996 and terminating no sooner
than the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal
Year 1999. as authorized by HUD. and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds
granted to the County for such period. COUNTY mav notify COOPERATING UNIT prior to the end of the
Urban County qualification period that the Agreement will automatically be renewed unless it is terminated in
writing by either party. Either COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT may exercise the option to terminate the
Agreement at the end of the Urban County qualification period. If COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT fail
to exercise that option, it will not have the opportunity to e.xercise that option until the end of a subsequent
Urban County qualification period. COUNTY' will notify the COOPERATING UNIT iii writing of its right
to elect to be excluded by the date specified by HUD.
This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any changes
necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Oualification
Notice applicable for the year in which the ne.xt qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either
party to adopt such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the
expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in COOPERATING UNIT’S Jurisdiction.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end
of the program period during vvhich HUD withdraws its designation of COUNTY as an Urban County under
the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate otTicers of COOPEIUYTING UNIT and COUNTY
pursuant to authority granted them bv their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution
and e.xecuted Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Office
of Planning and Development, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than_________199 .
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY' shall take all actions necessary' to assure compliance with the
applicant ’s certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Ci\il Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing Act. Section
109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and other applicable laws.
IV. ACTIVITIES
C(X)PERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out within
the terms of this Agreement certain projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for funding
under the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential
activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all
applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes
or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate
county ’s responsibility' to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act. including the development
of the Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.
COOPERyVTING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COOPERATING UNIT will in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule prepare and provide
to COUNTY, in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development Block Grant
Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County
Consolidated Plan.
B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the
same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient
Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the
implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly
executed with and in a form prescribed by COUNTS'.
C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements
stated in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an
activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances a
written Tliird Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING
UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY.
D. COOPERATING UNIT shall implement all activities funded for each annual program pursuant
to this Agreement within Twenty-Four (24) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the
basic grant amount.
1. Funds for all activities not implemented within Twenty-Four (24) months shall be
transferred to a separate account foi reallocation on a competitive basis.
2. Implementation period extensions may be granted upon request in cases where the
authorized activity has been initiated and/or subject of a binding contract to proceed.
E. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community
development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County
Consolidated Plan.
F. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all programs and/or activities funded in part or in full
by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard
to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall. In
implementing all programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount comply, with ail
applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights,
affimjative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the
COUNTY.
G. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction
or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be
prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities.
H. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process as established by
COUNTY in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, as amended.
I. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or
COUNTY to be ineligible.
J. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the
interests of the parties hereto or an\ other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY.
K. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance
to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations w ithin its jurisdiction.
COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COUNTS' shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies, on an annual
basis, all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount
under the Act.
B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating
services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding.
C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY
in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program
and housing goals.
D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING LINIT, agree to administer local
housing rehabilitation grant programs funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY
shall receive Twelve percent (12%) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity
as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATfNG UNIT acfivitv'.
E. COUNTY may. at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to
administer for a possible fee other programs and/or activities funded pursuant to this Agreement
on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT.
F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop
and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative
directives, and administrative requirements of COLrNTY.
V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as
follows:
A. COUNTY' shall retain Ten percent (10%) of the annual basic grant amount for the undertaking
of eligible activities.
B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING
UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C and the procedure stated in part D of this
section for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to submit funding requests. The
allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding.
C. The COUNTY will calculate, for each COOPERATING UNIT , an amount that bears the same
ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the rat'os between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING
UNITS.
2. The e.xtent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all
COOPERATING UNITS.
4.
The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS.
In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the e.xtent of povert}'
shall be counted twice.
D. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section
in the following manner:
1. COOPERATING UNIT qualifying as a Metropolitan City (having populations of at least
50,000) will receive annual funding allocations equal to the HUD formula entitlement or
the COUNTY formula allocation, whichever is greater.
2. Other COOPERATING UNITS with COUNTY formula allocations of $50,000 or more
will receive funding allocations in accordance with the formula allocations.
3. COOPERATING UNITS with COUNTY formula allocations of less than $50,000 will have
their funds consolidated in a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY. Only
the COOPERATING UNITS, whose funding has been pooled, will be eligible to compete
for these funds.
r
The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The
COUNTS' assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liabilit>' for any
errors in the data furnished bv HUD.
In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof,
the amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner
determined bv COUNTY.
VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES
Any metropolitan city e.xecuting this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of
Urban Hennepin County .
m OPINION OF COUNSEL
The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby
opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that
the Agreement provides full legal authority' for COUNTY to undertake or assist in undertaking essential
community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted
housing. '
Assistant County Attoftiey
i
Vlll. HENNEPCS COUNTY EXECUTION
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on
^ 199 , and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having sigred this Agreement, the
COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
Upon proper execution, this
Agreement will be legally
valid and binding.
Assistant County Attorney
Date;
APPROYEE^AS TO EXECUtlON:
Assistant County/Attorney
. . V- '
Date:
COUNTY ’ OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
Chair of its Countv Board
And;
Deputy/Associate County Administrator
Attest:
Deputy County ’ Auditor
A
I\. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION
COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT’S governing body
having duly approved this Agreement on _________________, 199 , and pursuant to such approval and the
proper city official having signed this Agreement. COOPERXTTNG UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions
of this Joint Cooperation Agreement, contract______.
CITY OF
U \CCX)PAGRE.9TJTCOOP FIN
April 2J. 1996
Bv:
And:
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant to:
Plan A Plan B Charter
8
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 23, 1996
ITEM NO;
Department Approval:
Name Dorothy Hallin
Title City Clerk
Administrator Reviewed:
Item Description:
List of Licenses for Council Approval
GARBAGE & REFUSE COLLECTOR’S LICENSE:
Westonka Sanitation
3146 Island View Drive
Mound
PARADE & SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT:
Gear West Ski & Bike
Duathalon (Run-Bike-Run)
June 2, 1996, 8:30 a.ni. - 11:00 a.m.
i4 /(
Agenda Section:
Licenses
council MEETilQ
2 8 1996
^^OFOHOfJO
GAMBLING PERMIT:
Minnesota International Center
Steven and Diane Reynolds, Hosts for Benefit Gala
1570 Fox Street
June 8, 1996
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve listed licenses.
CITx' OP ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 53323
473-7357
License Year
Date Received
:^/f0
'>• - f -
Fee Paid Initials
garbage k REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION
The urdTrsicned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Otono and
ile^ewTth “ales application for a license to do so.
Business/Firm
Address
:^CGTGr;rri I I o*r
I hi M MB iC..-
MrtiiMn Mfj-----SS^fi4
(Street)
Business Phone Nnrnber c~ \ j—^
(State) (Zip Code)
Applicant's Name
Address
■ innN J. 7UCCARQ
Ov”.- (Street)
Phone Number 472~2043
I n.i nsiwr
Check One:Individual
Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono
Partnership
1 _ _
Corporation
Description of Vehicles (attached list if more) :|
year M'qr. cr°tt‘wt. «t,. sita/iards Llcens. Munber
1988 CRAUB CARRUER 51.000
1991 Int’l
1970 rORtr
1994 cheV
32.000
■40.00f>
15.000
22.000
30.000
in non
17
0X1
YA a^417
Yu 96326
Yu 60369
Ym 93144
General area of City served
,, . ^...,t;14.25 1 CAN. 16.25 2 can. 19.25 3 canSchedule of Collection charges/ dates ------------------------------------------------------------------
200Approximate number of customers in Orono
Location of dumping area -- - -tL _ _ _ _ _ _
IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING.
Surety bond in the amount of SI,000. Proof of insurance
5100,000-5300,000-550,000, and cancellation c ause^^ apolicable).
530.00 flat rate fee, plus 515/truck, ajid _ _ _ _ _ _
raJn'throllVr’InroVeVaToVorthrab’o’v’e business and 1 have paid all license fees
and iMxis required by law. The above information is correct.
Applican FI/ate
;orcIi;'osro;;LY: After re.ie.jt^..pnction. ^taff^reco^ends = .
X Approval ___
Signature of City Official Date
DATE:5-20-96
TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Gear West Duathalon
I have reviewed the application from Gear West representative Jan Guenther on behalf of the
duathalon. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit.
I did advise Ms. Guenther that they would have to have professional people directing traffic at
the various crossings to assist the bicyclists.
• -----
PARADES & SPECLAL EVTENTS PERAUT APPLICATION
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
Permit #:
Fee: $50.00
Date Received: j ' <3 0 —9 ^
Phone Number: [ci2 ^ 'CC^ ^
Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip:___?6o'>(r
J
Location of Parade or Event: ^,tr,v\G ^ycLe^-f
Date of Event: r L 'A i <y-Hours of Event: *^ 38^-* ll>0d
Typpnf F\/ftnt! l‘^ C7> c't t0^4U'ov^ ( - bi,U p
Insurance Company: ^___ Amount.--------------------
(Copy of insurance certificate must be submitted with this application)
I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and
special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of
Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly
rrom the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit.
I understand some events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a
fee may be required for these services.
S' ur^tu/i-i
Signat^fe Date
Approved: D Denied: O By.
Remarks:
010396 3
G.6' m\e^
•Kt4.
Aft on<oo oty^^AL-R*Y w
2® ItffiP " 'W "W^
•* P -ttdwith'VI 2£rtt-
-ffdHVthw .
c.wiv.d«
r-r*-m
•/
I-o
• •
oo
2IX»
—I
r*-!
Cl
o
UMM
LG220
Rev06/95 Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Application for Authorization for an
Exemption from Lawful Gambling License
For Board Use Only
Fee Paid
Check #
Initals
Date Reed
Organization Information
Organization Name
Minnesota International Center
Previous lawful gambling exemption number
Street
711 East River Road
City
Minneapolis
State
MN
Zip Code
55455
County
Hennepin
Name of Chief Executive Officer of organization (CEO)
First Name Last Name
BvrneCarol
Name of Organization Treasurer
First Name Last Name
Da>1ime Phone number of CEO
^612^625-8646
John Leavitt
Daytime Phone Number of Treasurer
2 ^825-7030^12)
Type of Nonprofit Organization
Check the box below which best describes
your organization
Fraternal
I I Veterans
I I Religious
[~^ Other nonprofit
Check the box that indicates the type of proof attached to this application
by your organization;
nn IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status
□Certificate of good standing from the Minnesota Secretary
of State ’s office
I lA charter showing you're an affiliate of a parent
nonprofit organization
LD^roof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control
Board
Gambling Premises Information
Name of Establishment where gambling activity will be conducted
Home of Steven and Diane Reynolds - hosts for MIC's Benefit Gala
Street
1570 Fox Street
City
Wayzata
State
MN
Zip Code
55 391
County
Hpnnpp*! n
Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing)
Tickets sold on June 7 and June 8. Drawing nn .limp S
Check the box or boxes which indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting
I—I Bingo Raffles □ Paddlewheels □ Pull-tabs □ Tipboards
Be sure the Local Unit of Government and the CEO of your organization sign
the reverse side of this application.
For Board Use Only
Date & Initials of Specialist
Z
A RESOLITION GRANTING A GAMBLING PERMIT FOR
MINNESOTA INTERNATIONAL CENTER
BE IT RESOLVED, the City ot Orono agrees to approve the gambling permit
application for the Minnesota International Center for a one day operation, June 8, 1996, at the
home of Steven and Diane Reynolds, 1570 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota.
The above resolution was moved by
an.'*, duly seconded by_____________________
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
The above resolution was duly adopted on May 28, 1996.
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
■ S
..jm
/A
COUNCLUEETINQ
MAY 2 8 1^96
CITY OF ORONO
r
21 Miy 1996
TU9 8:33 AM
Ch«ck
Number
Qieck Number
51483
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
51483 CITY COUNTY CREDIT ONION
22-my-99 :: city county credit UNION
Totals Check Number 51483 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Check Number
51484
51484
51484
51484 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
22-Ma/-96
22 May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF IJUCES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
51484 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Transaction
Amount
5,744.00
5,744.00
2.959.58
2.959.58
7.233.47
13,152.63
Page 1
Comments
SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED
FICA ii MEDICARE W/H
FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING
Check Number 51485 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO.
51485 22 May-96
Totals Check Number
GREAT WEST LIFE ASS’^ANCE CO
51485 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSLTIAKCE CO
Check Number
51466
51486 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT 4 COLL
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT k COLL
51486 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT & COLL
1.190.00
1.190.00
164.62
164.82
defer:-D COMP W/H
THOMTON 8C0266780
Check Number
51487
51487 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
51487 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL
184.50
184.50
SKREEN 8CUL62310
Check Number 51488 ICMA RETIRE.MENT TRU''T - 457
51488 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
ICMA RETIR1.MENT TRUST - 457
51488 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
100.00
100.00
DEFERRED COMP W/H
Check Number 51499 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
51489 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
51489 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Check Number
51490
514 90 MI.* DEPT OF REVENUE
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
51490 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
Check Number
51491
51491 MN MUTUAL LIFE
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MN MUTUAL LIFE
51491 MN MUTUAL LIFE
495 -wO
495.00
3,032.08
3,032.08
55.00
55.00
UNION DUES W/H
STATE TAX W/H
DEFERRED COMP W/H
21 May 1996
Tue 8:33 AM
Check
Kufflber
Check Number
51492
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
51492 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
22-May-96 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
Totals Iheck Number 51492 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP
Transaction
Amount
150.00
150.00
Page 2
Comments
DEFERRED COMP W/H
Check Number 51493 PEBSCO/OBRA
51493 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
PEBSCO/OBRA
51493 PEBSCO/OBRA
194.75
194.75
OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H
Check Number 51494 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
51494 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
51494 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
1,742.50
1,742.50
USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H
Check Number 51495 PERA
51495
51495
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
PERA
PERA
51495 PERA
3,611.96
5,028.45
8,840.41
PERA EMPLOYEE W/H
PERA CITY SHARE
Check Number 51496 UNITED WAY
51496 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
UNITED WAY
51496 UNITED WAY
29.00
29.00
CHARITY DONATIONS W/H
Grand Total 35.074.69
23 May 1996 Check Register
Thu 4:12 PM City of Orono
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 51497 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
51497 22-May-96 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 262.41 SECURITY MONITORING
51497 22-May-96 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 211.94 MOTION SENSOR
5149*"22-May-96 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 138.45 HOLD UP BUTTON
Totals Check Number 51497 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 612.80
Check Number 51498 ANCHOR PAPER
51498 23-May-96 ANCHOR PAPER 538.89 COPY PAPER
Totals Check Number 51499 ANCHOR PAPER 538.89
Check Number 51499 ANTHONY'S FLORAL
51499 22-May-96 ANTHONY'S FLORAL 12.78 FLOWERS
Totals Check Number 51499 ANTHONY'S FLORAL 12.78
Check Number 51500 ASCCM MAILING SYSTEMS
51500 23-May-96 ASCOM MAILING SYSTEMS 610.00 MAINT CONTRACT
Totals Check Number 51500 ASCOM MAILING SYSTEMS 610.00
Check Number 51501 AT&T
51501 22-May-96 AT&T 5.30 LONG DISTANCE
51501 22-May-96 AT&T
1.85 LONG DISTANCE
51501 23-May-96 AT&T 44.65 CELL PHONE-GERHARDSON
Totals Check Number 51501 AT&T 51.80
Page 1
Check Number 51502 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
51502
51502
51502
23-May-96
23-May-96
23-May-96
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
Totals Check Number 51502 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
Check Number 51503 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
51503
51503
22-May-96
22-May-96
AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
Totals Check Number 51503 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
Check Number 51504 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
51504 22-May-96 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
5.12
5.12
42.66
52.90
39.50
39.78
79.29
25.00
CELL PHONE CHARGES
CELL PHONE CHARGES
CELL PHONE CHARGES
COFFEE
SANDWICHES
SCHOENHOFF-DOMESTIC VIOL
23 May 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
51504
51504
51504
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Date Name
51504 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
22-May-96 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
22-May-96 BCA/FCRENSIC SCIENCE LAB
22-May-96 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
Totals Check Number 51504 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
Check Number 51505 BOBZIEN, SUE
51505 22-May-96 BOB2IEN. SUE
Totals Check Number 51505 BOBZIEN, SUE
Check Number 51507 BORIS. SCOTT
51507 22-May-96 BORIS. SCOTT
Totals Check Number 51507 BORIS, SCOTT
Check Number 51508 BRICKLEY SERVICE CO.
51508 22-May-96 BRICXLEY SERVICE CO.
Totals Check Number 51508 BRICKLEY SERVICE CO.
Check Number 51509 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
51509 22-May-96 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC,
Totals Check Number 51509 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
Check Number 51510 BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
51510
51510
22-May-96
22-May-96
BUCKEN Err/1 RON-MENTAL SERVICES
BUCHEN ENVIROriMENTAL SERVICES
Totals Check Number 51510 BUCHEN ENVIROriMENTAL SERVICES
Check Number 51511 BUDGET PRINTING
51511 22-May-96 BUDGET PRINTING
Transaction
Amount
25.00
200.00
200.00
Comments
DEMBOUSKI-DOMESTIC VIOL
FISCHENICH-INTOXYLI2ER
BORIS-INTOXYLIZER
450.00
29.99
29.99
UNIFORM REIMS.
Check Number 51506 BONESTROO ROSEr«*E 6 ASSOC.
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.684.25 MAR KELLY AVE SWR
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.3,468.07 APRIL KELLY AVE SNR
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.211.25 L.S. 86 EVAL. MARCH
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.448.50 MARCH MSA GEIiERAL
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.531.24 L.S. 86 EVAL. FEB
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,555.28 FEB SAGA HILLS SWR REHAB
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.95.95 iEB OCB RD TRAIL
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,572.26 FEB MSA GEN
51506 23-May-96 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,579.40 FEB RETAINER
Totals Check Number 51506 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.U. 146.20
28.00
28.00
84.50
84.50
451.74
451.74
1.500.00
161.88
1,661.88
hffiALS REI.M3
PHONE JACK FOR ADT
L.S. REPAIRS
INSTALL LINER
ADD'L CHARGES
46.86 COLOR PRINTS
23 May 1996
Thu 4:12 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
Date Name
51511 BUDGET PRINTING
Check Register
City of Orono
Totals Check Number 51511 BUDGET PRINTING
Transaction
Amount
46.86
Page 3
Comments
Check Number 51512 BUREAU OF ATF
51512 22-May>96
Totals Check Number
BUREAU OF ATF
51512 BUREAU OF ATF
250.00
250.00
LIQUOR Lie RENEMAL
Check Number 51513 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS
51513 23-May-96
Totals Check Number
CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS
51513 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS
82.25
82.25
MAY LEASE-NEW COPIER
Check Number 51514 CHUNKS LAXESHORB AUTO
51514
51514
51514
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
51514 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
85.80
52.12
472.79
610.71
il67 TOW CHARGE. STARTER
il76 OIL CHANGE. BRAKE CX
8173 BRAKES. FUEL PUMP
Check Number 51515 CITY OF INDEPEin^ENCE
S151S 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
CITY OF INDEPENDENCE
51515 CITY OF INDEPENDENCE
344.88
344.68
TRAINING MEETING
Check Number 51516 CITY OF O.RCNO PETTY CASH
51516
51536
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
51516 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH
23.56
55.09
78.65
KORN FOR SEVERE WEATHER
BATH/KITCHEN SUPPLIES
Check Number 51517 CITY OF WAYZATA
51517 23-May-96
Totals Check Number
CITY OF WAYZATA
51517 CITY OF WAYZATA
1.726.91
1.726.91
1ST QTR WTR CONSUMPTION
Check Number 51518 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
51518 22May-96
Totals Check Number
COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO,
51519 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO,
871.23
871.23
JUNE I.NSURANCE
Check Number 51519 CU^^INS ALLISON
51519 23-May-96
Totals Check Number
CUMMINS ALLISON
51519 CUMMINS ALLISON
260.52
260.52
MAINT-PAPER SHREDDER
23 Hay 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
51520
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
51520 CYS UNIFORMS
23-May-96 CYS UNIFORMS
Totals Check Number 51520 CYS UNIFORMS
Check Number 51521 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW t UBAN
51521 22-May-96 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN
Totals Check Number 51521 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN
Check Number 51522 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
51522 22-May-96 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
Totals Check Number 51522 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
Check Number 51523 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
51523
51523
22-Kay-96
22-May-96
DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION
Totals Check Number 51523 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
Check Number 51524 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
51524
51524
51524
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Totals Check Number 51524 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Check Number 51525 DYNAMED
51525
51525
22-May-96
22-May-96
DYNAMED
DYNAMED
Totals Check Number 51525 DYNAMED
Check Number 51526 EARL F. ANDERSON 6 ASSOC
51526
51526
51526
51526
22-May-96
22- May-96
23- May-96
23-M.^y-96
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Totals Check Number 51526 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Check Number 51527 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
51527 22-May-96 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Totals Check Number 51527 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Transaction
Amount
287.45
287.45
51.73
51.73
112.00
112.00
4.47
45.41
49.83
32.45
321.80
354.25
428.97
317.51
73.33
37.94
857.75
84.70
84.70
Page 4
Comments
JACKET k PATCHES
PARK PLANNING
BEER
AS BUILTS
PARK COI^ISSION MINUTES
25.00 HA2 CHEM
100.00 HAZ CHEM
100.00 HAZ CHEM
225.00
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
STOP SIGNS
L.S. CONTROL PANEL REPAIR
SIGN-SHADOWOOD
SIGN-CRISTIFORI CIRCLE
BEER FOR RESALE
23 May 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check
number
Check Rumb sr
5I52B
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 5
Date Name
51520 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
22-May-96 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
Totals Check Number 51529 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
Check Number 51529 PAO. ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL
51529 22-May-96 FAO. ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL
Totals Check Number 51529 FAQ. ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL
Check Number 51530 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
Totals Check Number 51532 GEAR WEST SKI & BIKE
Check Number 51533 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
51533 22-May-96 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
Totals Check Number 51533 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
Check Number 51534 GENICOM CORP.
51534 22-May-96 GENICOM CORP.
Totals Check Number 51534 GENICOM CORP.
Check Number 51535 HEALTHPARTNERS
51535 22-May-96 HEALTHPARTNERS
Transaction
Amount
12.99
12.99
126.52
126.52
79.02
141.43
141.43
144.46
144.46
313.50
Comments
REPRINTS
M16 RIFLES
51530 22-May-96 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 11,097.31 SECURITY monitor;
Totals Check Number 51530 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 11,097.31
Check Number 51531 G &K SERVICES
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS
51531 22-May-96 G & K SERVICES 64.48 FLOOR MATS
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 47.09 FLOOR MATS
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 10.28 rathbun
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 70.08 STREET EMPLOYEES
51531 22-May-96 G & K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 10.28 RATHBUN
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 48.24 STREET EMPLOYEES
51531 22-May-96 G 6 K SERVICES 82.57 FLOOR MATS
51531 22-May-96 G & K SERVICES 4.73 STEFFENHAGEN
Totals Check Number 51531 G i K SERVICES 389.57
Check Number 51532 GEAR WEST SKI &BIKE
51532 22-May-96 GEAR WEST SKI 5. BIKE 79.02 BIKE TUNEUP
DISC, SPREADER
GENICOM RIBBONS
JUNE INSURANCE
23 May 199$
Thu 4:12 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
51535
51533 HEALTHPARTNERS
22-May-96 HEALTHPARTNERS
Totals Check Number 51535 HEALTHPARTNERS
Check Number 51536 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE
51536 22-May-96 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE
Totals Check Number 51536 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE
Check Number 51537 JOHN BECKMAN
51537
51537
22-May-96
22-May-96
JOHN BECKMAN
JOHN BECKMAN
Totals Check Number 51537 JOHN BECKMAN
Check Number 51530 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
51538 22-May-96 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
Totals Check Number 51539 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
Check Number 51539 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC.
51539 22-May-96 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC
Totals Check Number 51539 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC
Check Number 51540 LAXESHORE WEEKLY NEWS
51540 22-May-96 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS
Totals Check Number 51540 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS
Check Number 51541 LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK
51541 23-May-96 LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK
Totals Check Number 51541 LMCIT-BERjaSY RISK
Check Number 51542 LOGIS
51542
51542
23-May-96
23-May-96
LOGIS
LOGIS
Totals Check Number 51542 LOGIS
Check Number 51543 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
51543 22-May-96 LOm LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPtSOT
Totals Check Number 51543 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
Transaction
Amount
4,377.15
4,690.65
87.28
87.20
60.00
108.06
248.06
28.44
28.44
653.50
653.50
67.50
67.50
841.00
841.00
2«510.56
2«500.15
5.010.71
24.37
24.37
P«ge 6
Comments
JUNE INSURA.NCE
SUNNY MIX
REALIGN DOOR AT G.C,
LUNCHROOM FAUCET
CALCULATOR ROLLS
SEASONAL MAINTENANCE
ADVERTISEMENT
BAL DUE '95 WORKER CCMP
APRIL SERVICE
MARCH SERVICE
HOSE k FITTINGS
!
23 May 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 7
Check
Humber
Check Humber
51544
51544
51544
Date Name
51544 MEDICA CHOICE
23-May-96 MEDICA CHOICE
23-May-96 MEDICA CHOICE
23-May-96 MEDICA CHOICE
Totals Check Number 51544 MEDICA CHOICE
Transaction
Amount
262.03
112.29
10,590.71
10,965.03
CbfTsr.ents
JUNE INSURANCE
JUNE INSURANCE
JUNE INSURANCE
Check Number 51545 MGCSA
51545
51545
51545
22-Feb-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MGCSA
MGCSA
MGCSA
51545 MGCSA
15.00
50.00
80.00
145.00
STEFFENHAGEN - SEMINAR
1996 CONTRIBUTION
1996 DUES
Check Number 51546 MICRO AGE
51546
51546
51546
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MICRO AGE
MICRO AGE
MICRO AGE
51546 MICRO AGE
359.97
12,170.27
76.68
12,614.92
BACKUP TAPE CARTRIDGES
LAN EQUIPMENT
DATA CARTRIDGES
Check Number 51547 MIDWEST ASPHALT
51547
51547
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MIDWEST ASPHALT
MIDWEST ASPHALT
51547 MIDWEST ASPHALT
264.76
432.05
696.81
HAND PATCH
HAND PATCH
Check Number 51548 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
5154S 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
51549 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
416.80
416.80
POP
Check Number 5154 9 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
51549 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
51549 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
45.00
45.00
OXYGEN, ACETYLEN
Check Number 51550 CLERK'S k FIN OFFCR ASSN
51550
51550
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MN CLERK'S k FIN OFFCR ASSN
MN CLERK'S ii FIN OFFCR ASSN
51550 MN CLERK'S k FIN OFFCR ASSN
25.00
25.00
50.00
VEE-1996 MEMBERSHIP
HALLIN-1996 DUES
Check Number 51551 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
51551 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
51551 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
122.96
122.96
1ST QTR EXPENSES
23 May 1996
Thu 4:12 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
S1552
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
51552 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
22-May-96 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Totals Check Number 51552 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Check Number
51553
S1553
51553
51553
51553 NAVARRE HARDWARE
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
51553 NAVARRE HARDWARE
Check Number
51554
51554 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
51554 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Check Number
51555
51555 NORTHERN STATES POWER
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
NORTHERN STATES PCWSR
51555 NORTHERN STATES POWER
Check Number
51556
51556 NSP
23-May-96
Totals Check Number
NSP
51556 NSP
Check Number
51557
51557 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR
51557 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR
Check Number
51558
51558
51558 OFFICE DEPOT
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
51558 OFFICE DEPOT
Check Number
51559
51559 OSBOPN, BART
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
OSBORN. BART
51559 OSBORN. BART
Check Number
51560
51560 PIONEER
22-May-96 PIONEER
Transaction
Amount
550.00
550.00
185.74
6.19
13.20
267.18
472.31
8.00
8.00
21.79
21.79
108.36
108.36
9.46
9.46
132.41
78.67
211.08
29.82
29.82
42.00
Page 8
Comments
ANDERSON-FIRST LINE SUPRV
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
DNA TEST
STREET LIGHT BILL
NSP CHARGES
REPAIR VALVE STEM
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
SIGN FOR LESSONS
1996 SEAL COATING
23 May 1996
Thu 4:12 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 515( PIONEER
Totals Check Number 51560 PIONEER
Check Number 51561 POPHAM HAIK k ASSOC
51561
51561
23-May-96
23-May-96
POPHAM HAIK i ASSOC
POPHAM HAIK i ASSOC
Totals Check Number 51561 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC
Check Number 51562 PRAIRIE OFFSET
51562 23-May-96 PRAIRIE OFFSET
Totals Check Number 51562 PRAIRIE OFFSET
Check Number 51563 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC.
51563 ?2-May-96 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC
Totals Check Number 51563 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC,
Check Number 51564 PRECISION TURF
51564 22-May-96 PRECISION TURF
Totals Check Number 51564 PRECISION TURF
Check Number 51565 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST
51565 22-May-96 PRO TIRE &EXHAUST
51565 22-May-96 PRO TIRE 6 EXHAUST
51565 22-May-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST
51565 22-Hay-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST
51565 22-May-96 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST
Totals Check Number 51565 PRO TIRE k EXHAUST
Check Number 51566 R 6 T SPECIALTY INC.
51566 23-Kay-96 R fit T SPECIALTY INC
Totals Check Number 51566 R t T SPECIALTY INC
Check Number 51567 RATHBUN, BARRY
51567 23-May-96 RATHBUN. BARRY
Totals Check Number 51567 RATHBUN. BARRY
Check Number 51568 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
51560 22-May-96 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
Totals Check Number 51560 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
Transact ion
Amount
42 00
390.00
1.067.02
2.257.02
764 03
764.03
426.00
426.00
24..55
287.55
195.05
195.05
19.00
19.00
12.78
12.70
Page 9
Comments
OTTEN ASSMNT APPEAL
LEGAL RETAINER MARCH
ENVELOPES. RESOLUTION PAP
CONTROLLED BURN
BARRICADES
16.50 il74 REPAIR TIRE
307.02 il74 BRAKES. OIL CHANGE
37.50 0171 TIRE SERVICE
34.73 #175 OIL CHANGE. BRAKE CK
21.00 #171 TIRE SERVICE
416.75
D.A.R.E. SUPPLIES
LICENSE REIMB.
ID CARDS
\
31 May 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Oieck Number
S1569
51569 REED VENDING
22-May-96 REED VENDING
Totals Check Number 51569 REED VENDING
Check Number 51570 RICKS SUPERVALUE
51570
51570
22-May-96
22-May-96
RICKS SUPERVALUE
RICKS SUPERVALUE
Totals Check Number 51570 RICKS SUPERVALUE
Check Number 51571 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
51571 22-May-96 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
Totals Check Number 51571 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES
Check Number 51572 RYAN FORD
51572 22-May-96 RYAN FORD
Totals Check Number 51572 RYAN FORD
Check Number 51573 SCHARBER k SONS
51573 22-May-96 SCHARBER k SONS
Totals Check Number 51573 SCHARBER k SONS
Check Number 51574 SCHOENING EXCAVATING
51574 22-May-96 SCHOENING EXCAVATING
Totals Check Number 51574 SCHOENING EXCAVATING
Check Number 51575 SEH LIKE NEW
51575 22-May-96 SEN LIKJ; NEW
Totals Check Number 51575 SEW LIKE NEW
Check Numoer 51576 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
51576 22-May-96 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
Totals Check Number 51576 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH
Check Number 51577 STAR TRIBUNE
51577 22-May-96 STAr TRIBUNE
Totals Check Number 51577 STAR TRIBUNE
Transaction
Amount
28.40
28.40
8.59
32.71
41.30
6.524.32
6.524.32
358.52
358.52
44.54
44.54
275.00
275.00
126.42
126.42
158.11
158.11
24.05
24.05
Page 10
Comments
CANDY
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
JITJE ASSESSING
il71 ELEC. GASKET WORK
MISC PARTS
REPAIR G.S #6
UNIFORM REPAIRS
REPLACE LATCH. KEYS
SUBS^IPTION RENEWAL
23 May 1996
Thu 4 :12 PM
Check
ilumber
Check Number
51578
Date Name
51570 STREICHERS
22-May-96 STREICHERS
Check Register
City of Orono
Totals Check Number >1578 STREICHERS
Transaction
Amount
35.54
35.54
Page 11
Comments
WINDOW TINT TESTER
Check Number 51579 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH
51579 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH
51579 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH
300.00
500.00
T.H. 12 RELOCATE-PHASE 2
Check Number
51580
51580 TOP SQUADS
23-May-96
Totals Check Number
TOP SQUADS
51500 TOP SQUADS
Check Number 51581 TOWN k COUNTRY
106.13
106.13
il73 REPAIR LIGHTS. FLASH
51581 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
TOWN k COUNTRY
51581 TOWN k COUNTRY
96.39
96.39
LINERS
Check Number 51582 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
51502
51582
51582
22-May-96
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
51582 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
13.15
970.20
126.37
1.109.72
MISC D.A.R.E. SUPPLIES
T-SHIRTS FOR D.A.R.B.
STICKERS FOR D.A.R.B.
Check Number
51583
51583
51583 TRI STATE PUMP
22-May-96
22-May-96
Totals Check Number
TRI STATE PUMP
TRI STATE PUMP
51503 TRI STATE PUMP
1.550.18
1.432.89
2.983.07
AINL INSPECTION REPAIRS
G S. 86 PUMP 81 REPAIR
Check Number 51504 ULTIMATE AWARDS
51584 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
ULTI.MATE AWARDS
51584 ULTIMATE AWARDS
57.40
57.40
PLAQUE
Check Number 51505 ULTRAMAX
51585 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
ULTRAMAX
51585 ULTRAMAX
111.00
111.00
BUI4LETS FOR TRAINING
Check Number 51586 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
51586 22-May-96
Totals Check Number
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
51506 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
663.57
668.57
MISC UNIFORMS
23 Ma/ 1996
Thu 4:12 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
51587
51507 UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY. INC
22-May-96 UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY. INC
Totals Check Number 51587 UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY. INC
Check Number 51580 US WEST CELLULAR
51588 22-May-96 US WEST CELLULAR
Totals Check Number 51580 US WEST CELLULAR
Check Number 51589 US WEST COWfJNICATIONS
51509 23-May-96 US WEST COKMUNI'CATIONS
ToeaIs Check Number 51509 US WEST COW^JNICATIONS
Check Number 51590 VESSCO INC.
51590 22-May-96 VESSCO iNC
Totals Check Number 51590 VESSCO INC
Check Number 51591 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
51591 22-May-96 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
Totals Check Number 51591 VILLAGE CHEVROLET
Check Number 51592 WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH
51592 22-May-96 WAYZATA BAY CAR W;'iiH
Totals Check Number 51592 WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH
Crand Total
Transaction
Amount
8.804.41
8.884.41
538.00
538.00
8.84
0.84
141.11
141.11
99.595.76
Page 12
Comments
LEADRS S)FrWARE
CHESWICK AIR TIME
45.94 US WEST QIARGES
45.94
93.12 BODY UPPER INJECTOR
93.12
SWITCH FOR 8712
APRIL CAR WASHES
I
INFORMATION
ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL MEETMQ
MAY 2 8 1996
CfTYOFORONO
OF
fO o GITYof ORONO
MunkiiMl Offices
nrMt Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
MaWiil Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066
May 24, 1996
Municipal Sener Planning Update
Dear Orono Resident:
During 1995, the City held a series of neighborhood meetings to discuss
the possibility of municipal sewer service. The process that has been
followed thus far is outlined below'.
At the outset of this process there was some potential of moving ahead
with sewer projects in 1996. However, it now- appears there will be no
projects in 1996, but construction could occur in 1997. The City will
continue to extend the deadline for septic system upgrades, so that
residents in the areas scheduled for sewer will not be forced to pay
for a new septic system and municipal sewer.
Neighborhood Meetings Held
In 1994 a number of neighborhoods were identified where it will be
difficult or impossible to replace non-conforming septic systems due to
small lot sizes or other factors, making municipal sewer an attractive
option. Additional neighborhoods were considered for sewer due to their
proximity to the lakeshore. Neighborhood meetings were then held
during 1995 to inform residents about the need to upgrade septic systems
and the possibility of municipal sewer as an alternative.
City Requests MUSA Amendment
After the neighborhood meetings, the City Council concluded that all ten
identified neighborho j should be provided the opportunity to choo.se
municipal sewer as an option. In order for this to be possible, these
neighborhoods must first be included within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA). The MUSA is the defined portion of the
metropolitan area in which the Metropolitan Council allows extension
of municipal sewer lines to occur. Only about 1/3 of Orono is currently
within the MUSA. The ten neighborhoods identified in 1995 are all
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
outside the MUSA, and in January 1996 the City made formal
application to the Metropolitan Council for inclusion of these
neighborhoods in the MUSA.
Sewer Trunk Capacity Study Underlay
In reviewing Orono ’s application, the Metropolitan Council noted a
potential shonage of sewer capacity in downstream trunk lines shared
by the cities of Orono and Long Lake. Three of the ten Orono
neighborhoods would discharge to these trunk lines. The two cities are
currently working together to identify the specific capacity shortfalls and
determine the best method for increasing trunk capacity to serve the
needs of both municipalities. Once these capacity issues have been
defined and a plan is established for re.solvmg them, we anticipate
Metropolitan Council approval for inclusion of all ten Orono
neighborhoods in the MUSA. It is hoped that such approval will be
granted in the next few months, and any necessary trunk line upgrades
will commence as soon as possible.
What Is the Next Step?
Once the MUSA approval has been granted, the City Council will meet
to review the responses received in 1995 from each of the ten
neighborhoods, w ith a goal of establishing a timetable for construction
of municipal sewer lines. A few additional neighborhood meetings may
be needed this summer before final decisions are made, because some
neighborhoods have indicated concerns related to assessment costs, the
proposed location of sewer lines, street reconstruction, etc. which need
to be resolved.
The process would then continue through development of plans and
specifications, obtaining actual bids, holding of asse.ssment hearings, and
finally the ordering of projects to begin. This process will take several
months, hence we do not expect to commence sewer construction in any
of the ten neighborhoods in 1996. This does not rule out construction in
1997, however.
Further Questions?
<#>
Please feel free to contact City staff at 473-7357 if you have questions
about municipal sewer.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Kay 16, 1996 wiM
TO: LliCD Board Members
FROM: A1 Willcutt
SUBJECT: Second "Draft Budget" review session
The second "Draft Budget" review session will be held in the
LMCD offices on Tuesday 21, May at 8:00 AM. We encourage
all Board Members to attend this important session to include
your remarks.
It should be noted that the second "Draft Budget" exceeds
what is allowed by law in our enabling legislation by
approximately $14,000. Consolidating or reducing certain
line items such as: #18, #27, #28, #29, #31, (?) should be
considered.
Should youhave follow-up questions, please contact Greg or
myself.
GAW
ilEVEIiUE
1 LMCD CommunitiM Admn L«vy
2 Retervs Fund Contribution
3 Court Finoo
4 Licentot
5 Interest, Public Funds
6 Shoreiend Grants, DNR
7 Other Income
Subtotal, Adminietr^iofi
(a) Incoma Prepaid at 80 % in 1992
8 EW Milfoil Program
a City Levy
b Other Public Agencies
c Private Solicitation
d Reserve Fund Allocation
e Interest
Subtotal, CW Milfoil
1996 1996 1996 1996 1997
Budget Actual Budget YTD (3/31)Budget
1 80,322 77,857 1111,800 41,981 95,817
39,625 0 0 0 48,000
41,000 34,915 40,000 5,167 40,000
86,000 92,151 86,000 80,769 86,000
6,000 14,080 8,000 2,447 8,000
0 0 0 0 0
0 2,026 0 452 1,000
U62.947 221.029 $246,800 130316 278317
163,000 61,024 $29,500 11,077 82,500
40,000 25,500 24,500 1,000 24,500
0 0 1,000 0 1,000
18,500 0 50,000 0 0
8,000 15,226 10,000 2,936 12,000
t tOtAL REVENUE $382«447
101,760 $116,000
9ZZJ79 $300^
16,013
146«829
120AW0
398.817
D188UR8EMENtS
ADMINISTRATION
Personnel Services:
1 Salaries 1113,000 91,212 $106,000 27,035 114,000
2 Employer Benefit Contributions 19,700 14,714 18,000 4,763 19,357
3 total Pereonnal Servicae 1132,700 106,296 $124,000 31,798 133.367
Contractual Services:
4 Office Lease & Storage ♦11,647 12,262 ♦ 12,200 3,143 17,160
5 Professional Services 5,700 13,898 10,000 2,718 10,000
6 Total Contractual Services ♦ 17,347 26,160 ♦22,200 6,861 27,160
Office & Administrative:
7 Office, General Supplies $4,500 2,688 $4,500 1,513 4,500
8 Telephone 2,000 2,425 2,000 369 2,000
9 Postage 4,500 3,143 4,800 1,072 5,000
10 Printing, Publ., Adv.2,000 2,626 2,000 764 2,500
11 Maintenance, Office Equipment 2,000 1,238 2,000 1,243 2,000
12 Subscriptions, Memberships 200 275 300 65 300
13 Insurance, Bonds 4,200 7,224 7,500 0 7,000
14 Public Information, Legal Noticen 1,000 1,757 2,000 620 2,000
15 Mileage, Expanses, Training 2,500 1,428 1,500 168 1,500
16 Total Office 6 Administration $21,900 22.604 $26,600 6.814 26.800
DRAFT I
P«g#2 1995Budo«t 1995Actual 1996 1996 1997BudgaC YTO (3/31) BudgaC
Capital Outlay:
1 7 Fumitur#, Equipmant
"18 Computar aoftwara & hardwara updatM; Training
19 Total Capital Outlay
Lagal
20 Lagai SarvicM
21 Proaacution Sarvicaa
22 Hann. Cty Room 6 Board
23 Total Logal
Contract Sarvicaa/ Studiaa
24 Shoraland Rulaa* ONR Consultant
25 Shoraland Rulas, DNR City Grants
26 Laka Ralatad Studiaa 6 Programs
27 Mgmt Plan Impl./ Usar Attituda Survay
28 Boatar Ed. Pilot Program
29 Racord Archival
30 Total Contract Barvtaaa Studios
31 Contingancy
32 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
Exotics Managamant
Waad Harvastmg Program
33 Salarias 6 Employar Taxas/ Insuranca
34 Trucking Contract
35 Admmiatiativa
36 Operation Supplies
37 Contract Sarvicas *
38 Contingancy
39 Zebra Mussel Program
40 TOTAL EXOTICS MANAGEMENT
41 TOTAL EXPENSES
Sava the Laka Program Income:
a. Private Donations
b. Other Income
c. Interest
SubTotaL Sava the Lake
Sava the Lake Program Expanse:
a. Admin Exp
b. Program Exp
INFORMATIONAL:
EWM Equipmant Reserve Allocation
12,000
42«000
192
192
• 1,000
2,500
13,600
0
0
0
1,000
10,000
•22,000 21,410 •22,000 4,115 20,000
30,000 30,428 27,000 4,460 28,000
3,000 1,269 6,000 0 3,000
169.000 63,107 •66,000 8,676 61300
0 0 0 0 0
2.641 .0 0 0 0
0 0 7.000 0 0
413,000 0 7,500 0 5,000
410.000 0 0 0 5,000
7,500
426.641 0 • 14,600 0 17.600
12,000
4266.688 207.669 4246300 62,048 278,817
35,240 30,991 35.000 130 35.000
426.000 13,990 126.000 0 21,000
4.060 0 4.000 0 1,000
18,800 25,169 20.000 0 22.000
15.900 16.759 15,000 335 18,000
5,000 0 15,000 0 10,000
15,000
$106,000 86,909 4116,000 466 120,000
4360.688 294,468 4380,800 624113 388317
427,000 34,602 427.000 2,095
2.000 936 2,000 0
4,500 5,854 4,500 734
433,500 41,392 433,500 2,829
433,500 13,657
1,620
12,037
433,500
2,500
31,000
3,207
528
2,679
435,000 35,000 435.000 0
Th« following nssunptiona woro nado in tho draft I9f7 LMCD Budgoti
BDMIMIBTRATIOII
Executive Director
Administrative Technician
Administrative Secretary
Administrative Clerk
SALARIES (#H
$ 50,000.00
32.000. 00
24.000. 00
8.000.00
$114,000.00
IiOygR BEMEFIT CONTRIBUTIOMS (#21
$ 4,822.20P.E.R.A. ($114,000)
P.E.R.A. Lxfe Ins.
Commercial Life Ins.
F.I.C.A. (7.65%)
Medical Insurance*
Contingency
$ 19,357.00
* Current LMCD Health Insurance Policy
432
43
8,721
4,933
404
00
20
00
92
68
Office (900 sq. ft.)
Storage ($80/month)
OrriCB LEASE i STORAQE (#4>
$ 16,200.00
960.00
$ 17,160.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (#5)
Specialty Bookkeeping $ 7,000.00
Claire Link $ 2,200.00
Other Service ^ 800.00
$ 10,000.00
Property
Inland Marine
Municipal Liability
Excess Liability w/ Waiver
Bond
Contingency
INSURANCE/BONDS (#13l
$
100.00
1.023.00
3.510.00
1.230.00
105.00
1.032.00
7,000.00
ElOTICS MANAGEMENT
WEED HARVESTING PROGRAM
SALARIES 6 EMPLOYER TAXES/INSURANCE (#33|
Salaries $ 29,994.43
F.I.C.A.
Insurance
Auto
Workers' Compensation
$
2,294.57
700.00
2.011.00
2,711.00
Total Salaries & Employer $ 35,000.00
Taxes/ Insurance
* A new harvester will be purchased in 1997 from the EWM Equipment
Acquisition Fund. ^
Totd N«t
Shar« of
Shar« of Shoro of Totil
EV¥M n^grOTfi Adminiotrotion iucloot
Mwk*t Valu* Nat Tu CapaoHy Tu Capacity
Deaphavon 359,315.900 6,179,319 7.72
Excelaior 107,351,800 2,366,018 2.95
Oreonwood 71.237.300 1,304,053 1.63
Minnotonko 3,285,862.400 68,181,131 20.00
Mtka. iooch 81.078,400 1,512,712 1.89
Mkinotriafo 323.106,500 5,709,028 7.13
Mound 383.145,600 6,660,020 8.32
Ofono 773.959.000 14,100,320 17.60
Shorowood 521,671.900 9,103,697 11.37
Spring Park 57,807.200 1,422,298 1.78
Tonka Say 146,711.600 2,693,952 3.36
VIctoHa 190.681,800 3,341,040 4.17
Waytata 400,617.200 7,908,324 9.87
Woodland 93,736,500 1,767,074 2.21
$6,796J^82,900 1132.248.986 100.00
Loot Minnotonko:
68J81.9S6
'i4,ds7;85r
Total of net tax capacity leaa Minnetonka bacause Minnetonka it a constant 20%
Calculating per centaga;
City net tax capacity divided by 64,067,655 timet .80 equali percent
Use only 80% because Minnetonka is always 20%.
La. amount of city not tax capacity divided by 64,067,855 X .80 • % of total
Salaries (200 Hours)
F.I.C.A.
Insurance
Operation Supplies
Education
Contingency
ZEBRA MUSSEL PROGRAM f#3S)
$ 2,400.00
183.60
1,000.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
7.416.40
$ 15,000.00
* A second high-pressure sprayer will be
purchased in 1997 from "Save the Lake" Funds.
RESERVE FOMD ANALYSIS
ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET
1995
EWM
1995
ACTUAL
12-31-94
Allocation
Transfer to
Eq. Acq. Fund
POND BALANCE $125,577
$193,202*
39,625
28.000
$193,202*
0
0.
$175,630*
18,500
7^000
$175,630*
0
35x000
$193,202 $150,130 $140,630
* 12-31-94 AUDIT FIGURES
12-31-95 $125,577
Allocation 0
Transfer to 0
Eq. Acq. Fund
FUND BALANCE $125,577
ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET ACTUAL
1996
$203,971*
0
0.
BUDGET
EWM
1996
ACTUAL
$150,130
50,000
0.
$144,910»
50,000
0.
$203,971 $100,130 $94,910
* 12-31-95 AUDIT FIGURES
ADMINISTRATION
1997
EWM
1997
12-31-96
Allocation
Transfer to
Eq. Acq. Fund
FUND BALANCE
BUDGET
$203,971
48.000
35.000
BUDGET
$94,910
0
a.
$12C,971 $94,910
LMCp Reserve Fund Policy
Administrative (6 months)
EWM (12 months)
DOUGLAS T. DAYTON
300 County Road Six
West, MN 55391
Apnl 30.
MAY 1 1996
Tom p.f.
Prelimiti.ity Upsiyn Engineer
M'Pne'^otn r>rf)artment of Transportation
Waters ILcIcie
1500 West County Road 82
Rossvillo, MN 55113
Dear Mr. U Koefe;
Heie are some romtrients relating to The 12 Corridor Study.
1. North Ferndale is basically a residential street and its
resitlents would be severely impacted if ramps are installed
at the 394 overpass.
2. Highway 101 is already a good connector between County Road
6 and 394.
3. The stop lights at 101 and 6 provide breaks in the traffic for
those of us living on County Road 6 to get out of our driveways.
I he increased traffic on County Road 6 will make that even rrtotr
dillicult. Increased traffic on N. Ferndale would tend to smooth
out the breaks and make egress even more difficult for those of us
on 6.
4. Mooney Lake, in the NW quadrant of County Road 6 and 101,
has an increasing high water problem which the Minnehaha Water
'^hed District and The DNR are studying. The widening of County
Road 6 will aggravate the situation. I hope that the engineers will
have this in mind and consult with the DNR on this issue.
5.I have approximately 8 acres of restored prairie on County Road
G which was established beginning in 1970. I hope that I don’t have
to give more than my share for the widening of County Road 6. The
prairie is a unique feature for all to see. It takes a lot of work to
maintain it and even more to reestablish it.
6. Finsity, it s terrible thst the four lane couldn't be chosen.
I am concerned that we are winding up with only a partial solution rather
than a full blown one, however difficult and expensive that might have been.
Thanks for li'.tcning.
Youis.
O.
Doucjlns J. thy ton
o:: Edward J. (Callahan, Mayor of Orono
Bill Bruning
315 Silver Meadow Drive
Orono . MN 55356
May 19. 1996
Dear Mayor Callahan,
My family and I live in Orono, MN on a cul de sac through which MNDOT
has proposed to build highway 12 Our neighborhood of families, wild deer and
pheasant would be replaced by the 24 hour drone of traffic. I would consider this
"proposal" as a threat to my family's well being, our home as an investment and
my children's future. Besides the cost of anxiety and time spent to contest this
invasion, we are pressured to consider what legal actions to take. Our house
would be left on the bank of this freeway and MNDOT has informed us our only
compensation would be to file a lawsuit for hardships endured if we can't sell our
house. We don't want to sell our house. We do not want this highway in our
yard.
When MNDOT considers a highway development it must include not only
the cost of home displacement t Jt the financial loss of those homes left on the
side. We should not be told to forfeit what is rightfully ours. If this isn't
considered theft please advise me otherwise.
Our neighborhood has been put on hold for nine months. People have
stopped home improvements while they consider their options or lack there of.
Any assistance you could offer to protect our families and enable us to carry on
with our lives would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Yours Truly,
Bill Bruning
Bette, Melinda, Colin
& Stephen Bruning
MAY 2 2 1996
• / • .
iim f
M
Thomas a mkk Ph IX
N ul J. Lawson
A ssmtantto
tUHOnNnNMNT
ORO^'0 Public
Schools
District
Office
•
685 OLD
C rystal Bay
Road N orth
P.O. Box 46
t
Long Lake .
Minnesota
55356-0046
t
612-449-8300
612-449-8399
Fax
A n Equal
Opportunity
CHPLOYER
May 16, 1996
Mr. Tod Olson, Mayor
City of Long Laks
1964 Park Avenue
Long Lake, MN SS356
0
Mr. Tom O'Keefe
Minnesota Department of Transportation
1500 West County Rd. B2
Roseville, MN SS113
Dear Sirs:
It has just come to my attention that the latest
alternative to the Highway 12 construction may have
serious consequences for the Orono School District. In
the interest of achieving better communication, we are
concerned by the timeliness and means of notification
to the Orono School District. We believed that the
District would be informed and allowed to coioment on
alternatives that would effect student transportation
and safety.
It is my understanding that the alternative has only
two north/south roads that cross the "new" highway 12
in the vicinity of Orono and Long Lake. The obstructing
of Brown Road without providing some other way to cross
"new" highway 12 in that area, could potentially cause
serious time delays and/or cost inefficiencies for our
student transportation.
In addition, it appc^ars that Orono Orchard Road would
not cross the "new" Watertown Road. This again has
serious implications for student transportation unless
some other road was available for crossing "new"
Watertown Road in that general locality.
Please accept this letter as an expression of serious
concern over this alternative or any alternative that
would divide the Orono School District and
significantly effect the student transportation either
in efficiency or safety.
Sindl&rely,
:6mas Mich, Ph.D
cc: Ed Callahan, Mayor-
City of Orono
PC Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
1
Williitm J. StoJJurJ
May 23, 1996
Mr. Edward Callahan, Mayor
OronoCity Council Members
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Orono Officials:
I just wanted to thank you for selectinii me as a planning commissioner. While 1 have
allot to learn about the many unicjue things and various regulations of Orono (no, I have
not yet finished reading the library you delivered), 1 have a great desire to contribute and
compliment the current stal f and commissioners.
As you arc aware, I became involved with Orono staff/rcgulations during improvements
to our 1(X) year old house, and Laura and myself plan to live in our home for many, many
years. We want to thank you for your thoughtful but fair decisions which helped and
guided us during the improvement priK'ess. We started with a rough gem of a properly
which inclutled a guest house, boat house, wetland area and lake frontage, a lucky find
lhe.se days, and are happy to have completed our transformation.
1 will keep in mind Orontt's desire to protect our natural resources while helping the
resident/homeowner as you did with us. It is this type of decision making 1 will u.sc as a
representative of Orono on the Planning Commission.
I look forward tt) working with you.
Sincerely, your rookie commissioner
Willi^n J. Stoddard
cc: Ron Moorse
Jeanne Mabusth
John Gerhardson
^ 2W).S Kell) Au’nuc
Orono. Minnesota .s.S.V^I
IVIophonc: (612)471-8088 l ax: (612)471-0888
0
1VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH
2945 Westwood Road, Minnetonka Beach, Minnesota 55361
Telephone & Fax (612)471-8878
Msyor Nancy D. Check
freasurer Thomas H. McCarthy
R%cordw Martin J. Left
Trustees Michael B. Bloom, Nell E. Mathews, Bruce W. Palmer
May 24, 1996
Gary Cheswick. Acting Chief
Orono Police Department
P.O. Box 66
Crj'Stal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Gar>':
On behalf of the City of Minnetonka Beach, congratulations to you and the entire Orono
Police Force for excellent police work in connection with the recent burglaries. This was
an exan^le of high quality, professional police work on your pan and community policing
at its best. We thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Nancy D. Check
Mayor
I «
II
♦ *
I •
f •> 8
' 44^^fe>'
M.
'i£AjCVm^
A. // . /. y/ / . , . ^ ^ y<4^^ ^
!<S^
,j ^ry-^ 2?^^u4^
.^JLy^
/pyt^
I JP/^d/j p^<A^><y (Au< ,^:2c^2^Jik
/<2j4
•V'
/U^
Ijt/jL ^t^y(j/
J) \/u^
i
•V
jr
i-
series of 40 house meetings that
pedestrian issues cam' up in
nearlv everv discussion. Residents
of Minneapolis want safe and
attractive places to take a walk or
ride a bike. This fits in well with
two new ideas being heavily pro
moted by Green CiK activists:
"traffic calming” and urban vil
lages.
Traffic ca'ming. a concept
developed in the Netherlands and
now widely used in Europe and
Australia, involves redesigning
streets to allow people to coexist
VNith cars. This is done by employ
ing a set of clev er and inexpensive
design features that remind
motorists to drive slow and keep
an eve out for people on foot, on
bikes and in wheelchairs or baby
*'^The Linden Hills neighborhood
has installed traffic circles and
well-marked crosswalks lo curb
speeding drivers. In the Wedge
neighborhood and along 31st St.
near Uptown, local residents have
persuaded citv officials to narrow
the'vWdth of streets in
places.
s
•a
4
0-
Elil
Chicago and Linden Hills. It's no
coincidence that these neighbor
hoods have among the highest
propertv v alues in the Twin Cities.
The idea of urban villages figures
prominentlv in many neighbor
hoods' NRP plans and in citizen
meetings surrounding the
upcoming revision of Minneapo
lis' zoning codes.
To the new urban-oriented
ecology' activists, the biggest
threat facing the state is continu-
ing suburbsin sprawl. State Rep.
Mvron Orfield's Metroprolitan Sta- ^
biiization legislation, a series of ^
bills that aim to take away the v*.
unfair advantages outer-ring sub-
urbs now receive under existing
state and Met Couned policies, is j
the most important environmen- ,
tal initiative of the '90s. Orfield s
idezs have won attention and .
praise from across the country, as 0
have efforts by the local Land .
Stewardship Project to put the
brakes on unsustainable sprawl
that turns productive farmland j
into en\ironmentally taxing sub- ^
urbs.
Among the other key groups m ,
this new urban environmental Jg
movement: the Neighbor-
hood Transportation Net- J
work, which rallied opposi- >
tion to the widening of 35W j
and promotes sustainable >
transportation such as light
rail: the Cedar Lake Park
Association, which pre-
st.wcd lakeshore land as a
new p ark and blazed the trail
for a nev ’ bicycle path from St.
^ mW Louis Pari to downtown Mill-
. i:. ..U \ f PtlhUf
r'
neapolis: the Minnesota Public
Lobby. vvh*.:h stopped high-rise
developments beside parkland
and now is tackling the issue of
noise pollution from airplanes.
Tran<;if for I ivahle Communities.
Mrs. Erie B Savage, Jr. r, ?)
16Q2 Bollum Lari^t^
1U.J. ---------------------------- /- ./
1692 Bollum Lar^^
Long Lalce, Minnesota 553c6
V-iZ> ^
' -VL^ o. °(- ,
vv^ vJ-^icvlsua. 'fej ovj-o UJ-OaJ
. -itcv Y\cs^ V-ocr\^U
^Lx- vrcM^ o|:
^::j2> v-v.^vv^'^ y ^A^2- . uoJ^
o ~yyi Kj Ocv
, ft V-
F ca. Uj((i\^ ,:tAt ^bit
^,i^o\Cau^^ <:Lt.(rK.a/Aa/LtLi;u/~
/A: Aai^C y/irnyL^ t/.^f ~tAx\.cy ^
' . y ^ t ^
cA'A^ ^cA^if AAec^ ::ct7.i^Ca" %cy ,
aJc yAtnA^ C'cm^nvt^
~lA^t ^yut^AAly ' „^t/xjzy~_ X/iAL ' Cl '^L C-Cl^J /I (n cty
•lC-^ ^ Vt c t a y .^ A ac o cA l<lJ 7-'V zn-iJlcP
CcnbridLCAytA^^CTty A AeA'L^
V7it4^. C-icXy _J{, r?y•^nCiAfATiooyAc'coi^
"6-C'^;c(! /y-cxo-^
y!AtX/y(X,X:t'0<tJ Cp AH^vtucix^. AyiccAJ^d^
C^ cncA /iCc^AJx:>yL<0 i'(/iri<j2^
bx avnjL ^ ^ oocu
Oori'Cyucci^Cji cu K_yiA.aAi,to7u^^ /yeyb
A o tLx. , Th.v-y^ clJlyi AAr ctU^£<^^^<2J
~Ahe o^c'tyn. AO\jXy<^,
'the ^A xcjc^J t OJ^ApCQ^^chLJ ^yutoUl A p _^
C'tn^t Ac cZf-^ 't^^~Soye^
, ~th A'*l <’-vlcyt</eJ
'i^^nJt-i.UiS cCc-ytn'\_y / yoCJ
y,UcC? /y£_ictAfJ /.C<XJL -~th/CS /^CAyO-^
hicXj'ht tntAte Ac lA cvijj ^cA -fb JUy<AtJ
hty-f ia ^.L-ty'ho^C _^.<B /^at
'yt'oy / c c rc.A A • f Xi o.
Oy5- <^^czX-U^ eyncec4y^ cca
ncie^ "■' A, I <s,'^ TtLe^uP hC^^eJ
hxAtjin.. ext t. CA.A^ycZ'^i yCxLA e~A~\
~tt^e „ALtAi./ete/Ljtce(h.A
. A O/LAriiK
The A.^AzJ.c/lj^ A^oad^ Cul./-^
A(Z ^ 'The U^a-3LhL(LA
^\^-^c'AcUL' jr?^ V--.e^ e^/ic.ri^^
j41^'h44.'^A'yf~' A^ei^h4:<) ^xXO /y'^cicA^''
y<lt'ix^ hr> The /px-c>plc^ //-.
T o''1TA ‘l nCi<AhTiA-A^ie^^^, cA)e^
Aei4M A4.^'4-\ ^
ToOA.h^ diTui^ cT^A^ rc^ -J/-^
Oiixiy^^ XU njte<LJ . “TT^ tn^ c -?x irt^ey
P'oo a Xx ec i2 eeo ^•
The ry^^pyhClyiAynp-^ Tf^rn^U
O’ AXiZ ncT (XAXaJxpAzX^ r citf^
)2t'T/Lytpih iy-) ip To A<oAj. ^ACJ^p>
'the TtAijr ^e>cKT, nne^riyp-^
^.Xh.^cr7njAo ciAcn^QT jbx XAxxTAi i
CAeiy^ A/oeH^o-^e^ 4-r^ hhe^
/7^^T ^.^.^/) n/1.. x^-/-.-XaaA CiZALp^ Jlhlp^ aT
(pAzAcAdjp. J^^z.aijp^ cnAcir^ ^ALaL
h^ TJ'^c
crpxrxcyi^)
p/iAii/Ar^ To
ToAa pL Otup' 9 yPyAJ2AAAuoe TZ'CnJ
Lo^x.-AAp^ '-fT~^e.—^C^rn^nT{^a. C6<p^ „ ^ — - ~/j^^ ,. —
^ATf/STinA ^CpOuiTA e^e>Ay 9^ HipjAiv'^^
/cA^, cz2^T tA^A~eA aa.T'C^ v5^ ex TheLy
yAt olcOiaJ To opt Thyz^cze^h T(rt irr\
cTtLrLy 7\jp .^Aji^i iTp Acy t^-) -A^iyzfAxy
jt\ (xTpTc^ Ac-toT Tpe^ ^cUHix
ehpZ'Ocy'i^<LA aJO^u^cx^-^p a^tAoo/eo6tjoJ
'Tv caAla — Hft^Tua^cuOtT- v56", jS
[►
nc'-r hceA fr)Oy*i~Q^ yr.ccictci^,
^/jc. /p ^a A c c nc<L / “r ^
n^c eu^J n ‘^cK.c<-j^ •-/r 0 (( 'l.J''
.J?M ry/(A c^A\cj fr..x /-^
/^■orC'/ '^s' -f -co^ jet^ < ct C. /ct<LJ
lAjA\^cnr^^ ~iini<s
bt^ -^y-vyU. ^iXA c(^(L^
yuiA^Ajp^ c.ui^ ^ /Pcx cy-L^<y^-^ c^c^
ePbn/^f cJiTn'^'^pyx^ CMi'cn^
c^tubxtyy A-o 'AhcLJ-
.jbot'^ (Puy 'StTiXc^j
(^OAO p CCtX^_jbt'<l.-eLy mCr?xy<^ ^ypQyx_J
Cx )Tyu.^ jtAxi.xrujyA^ c-exyx A-rrixcry^
^ mincctxxU
^A j2<x ^A2JC^pcLiji_x L<yxcy-^-f- ^a'enjc,ji_J
pl(UC.yX^— yA-CuU /XA.X-zo^^A /^-^cXi/XL^
GjboAyx ^r\ .
C^CcrpjCy €- T'eS' rr\ ^ d-jCxxx ~Ap
p AdXLpe^-L/ oAJUi ^ ceyiOxt^UL
h'^UX/XjPOy -tlciP ,/PC' ,C /^C/xicA2xL/
^ff-p.tc^ /ti^i'uuectp^ yftcnrcx
S^ C// o rdi ~hc ^ .r - V ^7 / CU'^^xA^
// ^ > ' c?^'~Ci.'eZ/L /-o
or^ ~Co
f'V cut c^'L^^ulJ Oa^iX-UU
XL'U '/f- C CL
/c9
yJPcrrLj
xC'/c
^df ^ Qj:^aJ:>\jl ^ 'I'll c /i, o
_ ^/L(n<.d.^ <id -hr.-
'-f^^.th ,^zAa/^ ^ X' r>^f ItLy
yAlZ^CLA^ztccnid (Zxsf
^C /L^yi tf,. '^'h C^zn^dA: 1 Ct^ t-n^J
•€6?^-/' cd^C^hJltC<y-'^ UJO'Udc!
he^ rr^ucj^ 7%^/^
cz. (j? c^r^'ay^,
P\ n AAttzn.TYLt'L^A-^
/tdcL^ njv lidded A^nd'do.cf^^udJ '~hhcd
AL o
d^yt^ycm^O-^(y^cH'tj^c:^,
cL^r^ P^i^-cr r'^Qdt<yv'-^
yCkAx^tTK-J^P '^y^exy^i^u c^—
Jdc ^unAtip
'Z^eAtuA-. /p i^e^cjd^
oi<L Po /'y^Cri'^iZ '"Ao ^c^*^A^QcAf(Z.Ay_A
Ok CAXirx^ALAue^ 4^
y'/<f< exj-^' crixyn -tc^dyZ'^.
'>t ^,Z'\Al.Cr7t^^ Cl^ ^yf-(L-(L.^?^
^AZA.jzJ Xc neec/
^yfoAc U aA cul</Lc^ K^L^CL^c(L<L
L 6/1 C<A~" IC^ t- /^t _
A-O n'y^z/i Cf.^ pD<Acpi La.^ (TKac^
CaT/y^ nnt cJ^la Al^ C^ ^y'd'i cte VczCaa q_^
ACL yi,/ A^P~ X C7r\A^^y~ ,
Zl-^ n^A ipin.'^,
A (Ann ^ -yrCrurxzZ (lAtA> H (f eVt'^ <? .^ f- •
A (j s.c S( U A r I// <i't<' Dr^ Oy<T’'^o
C r~-y> cTfXi, ' 'he
Fcberr-*Z/,e,di.i l(ut;i/,a/f
Vs <^U yt.
J-e t'J Aa ke! SrU. SS3S6r
S-^i'96.
hd *^y) <■. r. c >1 ,
Pea^
/itce-' CC*,ceef,f Ui t,yU.... O l'/^t-€.y:^ru-eC
r, w.„, ,.y
U-- stir„.,.r. „<, ,... ,
cblijfdtxfd ^ ^
"/<?«se 6i,- / / .
w,, // ,,, ^ ^ iu L re.i^ir,h/i/-Ctfe) uhtcAlAculif u-ii Ui e-coci his< >■</ /
iUt t'klCeuSt' Trufi.c ^
't/fr Ce nc^y^J ,
Ur . 6. ft.
c. ,.y ,,,
C^h-'T' a. Xe..y/e, <;
MAY ? 8 J:15P
Jolynn Bems
58 Creekside Drive
Long Lake, Minnesota 55356
May 23.1996
Mr. Chuck Siggerud
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 W. County Rd. B2
Roseville. MN 55113
Dear Mr. Siggerud.
As a long time resident of Long Lake I would like to voice my concern with the Alternative 6 as
related to the Highway 12 study.
I am opposed to the Alternative 6 because I believe there are existing roadbeds that can be
improved to suflBciently solve the traffic issues in the area. As I understand it. Alternative 6
would include new roadbeds without an Environmental Impact Statement. The western suburbs
of Orono, Long Lake, Medina, Wayzata and surrounds are attractive, desirable and successful
communities because the residents and leaders have taken great care in preserving the peaceful,
rural environment, which in turn keeps propert>' values high and the tax dollars flowing to city,
county and state coffers.
I understand the Department of Transportation ’s mission to move traffic safely through our
communities, however as residents we must be able to live with the results of your efforts.
Another east-west road in Long Lake would be the third east-west road in a town of less than
one square mile! Furthermore, any new road construction without the benefit of an El S is
irresponsible, even more so in an area that has so carefully preserved its natural environment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jolynn Bems
c: (/Mayor Tod Olson, Long Lake
Mayor Edward J. Callahan, Orono
S. BARTLEY OSBORN
w!^Y?■e
7)>^/8--
Cji\J) I (^C\C€J^y\cS^
(f e.hex^
CtriCWv.c\^^
<p^ruA i^CJ ^
(3el2j£(J e- S^crz4£>(i(,
^lit^Si L-OUU \aJy)OvlS)
/^VOCtd
No^I
'6nti/5 Wui I'
\J
^^l^^iuxtroe- ^ ■
nl
Vr^
I [jjLiJ.er)
dcLH
i
t}fjud
J-W)^)ci /^oa S( t
if^cs ^ Uffli?] Gi-TeAUd
i
(k/^ .
ysiuk;rT
B'0>>T ^S, 6SlyO/t\r)
^ ■flr. k rr^
\\]^ 0.u^ef- (^bou"neho.
U.O dcst
aoJ. ^niu(3
or-
QeJiSJh Cul FUO^
4