The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-26-1996 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1996, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. N a ^ \ ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦ 2. Regular Meeting of February 12, 1996 PARK CO^LMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION CO^LMENTS PUBLIC CONLMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3. Oberhauser - Status Report of Removal of Boarded Up Structures (4 /^2104 B. Scott Ball, 1065 West Femdale Road - Variance - Resolution 45. /^2106 William and Laura Stoddard. 2605 Kelly Avenue - Variance - Resolution 1-6. ^2111 T. J. Bieker, 2440 Old Beach Road - Conditional Use Permit - ResoUmcn 7. Zoning Amendment, Section 10.20 Subd 3 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGLNEER REPORT 8. Change Orders 9. Highway 12 Traffic Signal Agreement and Payment CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 10. Valek Property Park Access Right-of-Way 11. Volunteer Commission Appointments 12. Saga Hill Tax Forfeit Parcel Update CITY ATTORNEY’S HI !N kT (*13.) LICENSES (♦14.) BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 19%, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 02/26 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/27 - School Board meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/04 - Park Commission meeting 7:15 p.m. 03/05 - Precinct Caucus Day - No Public Meetings after 6:00 p.m. 03/11 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/12 - Highway 12 Land Use Study Committee 8:00 a.m. 03/12 - School Board 03/18 - Planning Commission meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/25 - Council meeting 7:00 p.m. ‘t I >f ffllllllV niT'iTTififf' wMF-------- Public A ttendance D ate ^ ~.4i (r - ^Meeting i ‘ C ouncil n Planning C ommission □ Park C ommission Other Please fill out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER V A (i-«—C j»H rH I i 3.^ L ^ ~h- 4 I iP l (.L^t-ra /L_ V vC^v f./ V GMJ f \ IJ /if <1. >> VonivA V -?^(-'LLer| VI (C\r * '^^<<'^■'1^ f-'t‘Fi.'sl V]^Ip r ^ !(■ i|k-)^ L lca ‘ (i I u i f ' ’ . f iC 8 ^A. / Aju;- N 2>>.' 10.. 11.. 12. 13. 14. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 12,19% ^ ROLL ~ ^ ^6' The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward *%> J. Callahan, Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley, and JoEUen Hurr, who arrived during the discussion of agenda item #9 Council Member Jabbour was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building and Zoliing Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to \ order at 7:00 p m. (*#1) CONSENT AGENDA Items #3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 14. and 19 were added to the Consent .'\gcnda. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#2) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1996 Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 22, 1996. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COM.M ENTS Park Commissioner Mc.Millan reported that the Park Commission voted to recommend adding one more night for baseball use at Bederwood Park. The softball association is short of fields and requested an additional 2 nights usage at Bederwood, which would be traded with the baseball association to free up 2 nights at Long Lake’s Holbrook Field for softball. After discussion, the Park Commission voted for the recommendation ot one more night (Wednesday) to accommodate the softball association to alleviate the shortage problem The Commission had recommended a yearly review in hope that other communities would address the problem. Gociten asked McMillan how many nights are currently being u.sed at Bederwood for baseball and was told 2 nights, Tuesdays and Thursdays McMillan said Bedeivvood has a dirt infield, along with a pitching mound, both of which are designated tor baseball use. McMillan said the Commission felt the trade was fair as the City does not accommodate the softball need. Registration is beginning at this time for the upcoming season MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (Park Commission - Continued) Kelley noted the need to address the new pressures placed on the City for space for such programs with the possible closure of Oak Brook Park, which would be eliminated with the Highway 12 corridor. McMillan said the softbaU and baseball associations are looking at long range planning. Kelley said Holbrook Field was originally used for baseball but changed to softball 4 years ago for girls and coed play. McMillan said the field is also used for Little League. She also noted the concession stand at Holbrook, which is run by the softball association. Kelley said there are 5 softball fields at the school field and no Little League, which he felt must be kept in perspective with the community at large. McMillan added that the softball association is considering expanding the age groups of the players. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Hawn had no report. PUBLIC COMMENTS Steve and Joan Valek. 4720 Tonkaview Lane, asked to address the Council regarding the tax forfeit parcel near Saga Hill. Steve Valek was under the impression that a 1/2 acre piece of land w as to be given to the Valek's, which was approved at a Council meeting in November. 1994, by a resolution giving the Valek’s the opportunity to acquire the 1/2 acre parcel. Valek said the County has yet to receive the resolution and has been w orking with City Staff to get the issue resolved since la.st summer. Valek said he has spoken with Pat O’Connor of the County Tax Forfeiture Department. He was informed by O’Connor that the City has two options, one to present a resolution stating the metes and bounds of the property to allow the sale to the Valek’s, or the option to purchase the property. Callahan asked Valek if he w as aw are of the effort by the public to gain property in the Saua Hill area for a park. Valek said he was aware of this. Callahan said the City was under the impression that the County was going to give the 9-1/2 acre ta.\ forfeit parcel to the City, who made application to gain the parcel. Callahan told Valek that the County had informed the City that they did not wish to donate the property but asked the City to purchase it instead. Callahan said the City does not wish to purchase the 4-1/.. acres (the other five acres would be given to the City) but want it also donated. Callahan said the City and County arc in negotiations on the matter, which he said did not focus on anv arrangement with the Valek’s. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (Public Comments - Continued) Joan Valek said the County had agreed to split off the 1/2 acre to add to the Valek property, which was needed to aUeviate drainage problems. The County, however, needs the City’s approval bv way of a resolution stating the metes and bounds of the 1/- acre parcel before the County can spUt ofifthc 1/2 acre parcel. Joan Valek said O’^nnor is awaiting a survey of the property, which she was told needed to be done by the City. Callahan responded that the County was the owner of the land. Moorse interjected that it was Statf s understanding when the Council approv ed the 1/2 acre parcel to be added to the Valek property that there was a condition that an easement be provided to gain access to the parkland. Valek noted that the 10' alley was an abandoned utility easement and questioned that it was to be turned into an access Moorse said when the approval was made, it was agreed that the easement would be moved to the side of the property and still be maintained as an easement. Dunng preparation for this to occur. Staif determined that in order to provide a reasonable access, there would be a need to expand the easement from 10' to 20', to which the Valek's disagreed Joan Valek said the resolution was never contingent on moving the easement on their propeny. She added that the alley had nothing to do with the resolution. The Valek's asked that the issue be placed on the Council agenda. Callahan responded that the matter would be taken up at the next Council meeting scheduled for February 26,1906. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (*W) #2064 GEFFRE/OLSON, 4665 BAYSIDE ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AND VACATION- RESOLUTIONS #3669 AND #3670 Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3669 granting a subdivision of a lot line rearranuement and oversize accessory structure variance tor Irvin T. Geffre and Robert S. Olson at 4665/46XX Bayside Road, and further adopt Resolution #3670 vacatinn a portion of drainage and utility easements within Outlot C, Bayview Farms Second Addition. Vote Ayes 3, Nays 0. (-«#4) #2088 STEPHEN GARDINER, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - VACATION OF UNIMPROVED ALLEY - RESOLUTION #3671 Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3671 vacating 30 unimproved alley as dedicated in the plat, Ottoville of Lake .Minnetonka, in 1887. Vote: Ayes 3, Navs 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (•#5) #2095 STEPHEN M. ENGLUND, 2S55 CHERRY AVENUE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3672 Kelley moved, Goctten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3672. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. (•#6) #2096 DIANE AND KEVIN HOLMES/ORCHARD PARK FARM, INC 555/585 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3673 Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3673. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#7) #2097 PATRICIA GUTTORMSON, 3315 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3674 Patricia Guttormson was present Mabusth reported that there were two issues regarding the variance application; the structural repair completed for the masonry wall and the new cement wall, located wthin the 0-75* zone, and the variance for replacement of the deteriorating deck. The deck will be reduced in area by 172 s.f, which will result in a hardcover reduction in the 0-75 ’ zone The Applicant also proposes removal of 130 s t ot patio in the 75-250 setback area. The lot coverage, now at 16 1%, will be reduced down to 14 6%. Hardcover m the 75-250' setback area will be reduced from 26% to 22%. This results in twothe 75-Z5U setoacK area wm uc icuuv,cu ----------------- conforming findings due to the improvements. Mabusth reported that the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval. Goetten commented that she understood the area was difficult to work with and appreciated the reductions made in hardcover, while still gaining the needs of the applicant. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3674 Vote: Ayes 3. Nays 0. (#8) #2099 LOREN BRUEGGEMANN/DEL\N MAESER, 372 WESTLAKE STREET - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - REPLAT WITH VARIANCES This application was tabled to a later time in the agenda due to the lack of applicant representation The property owner arrived shortly after the start of the repon on the application. Gafffon reported that the owner of the property was Dean Maeser, 372 Westlake Street. The property consists of 3 parcels with three .separate ta.\ statements consisting of Lots 10 11, and 12, delineated by a long narrow lot totalling 1.99 acres in the 2 acre zoning district. < ^ ____ -A - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#8 - #2099 Brueggemann/Maeser - Continued) Gafiron continued that the applicant, Loren Brueggemann, proposes a lot line rearrangement requiring a replat for 2 distinct building lots. The house on Lots 10 and 11 would be tom down along with the accessory building and two rental cabins. Two new houses are proposed to be built. The replat creates a front lot/back lot situation requiring the configuration of a 30' outlet. The front lot would be 0 76 acres where 2 acres are required. Lot 2 requires 150% of the 2 acre standard but would be 1.09 acres in size. This results in substandard variances for Lots 1 and 2 Gaffron reported that the front and back lot needs setbacks not standard on 2 acre lots ^ with 150®/o required for back/front setbacks The lakeshore setback stUl applies. The 30 ’ access outlot is still required leaving a small building envelope. In Lot 1, based on the front/back configuration, a 50' side setback is required, leaving a building envelope of only 10' wide, which is not suitable Lot area variances are required for Lots 1 and 2. Lot 2 requires a 10' width variance at the street setback where 200 is necessary Lot 1 requires a 30' side street setback variance for the proposed house, which is proposed at 20' where 50' is required. A hardcover excess is shown in the outlot at 35%, where 25% hardcover is allowed. Lot 2 does meet the hardcover standard. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission reviewed the application at their January 16 meeting. A 4/0 denial recommendation was made due to the lack of finding acceptable hardships It was noted that the property has been assessed for one sewer unit. Gaffron said there are two stubs to the property but it has no bearing on the property. It is unknown why the second stub exists. The property has not paid for or have the right to the second stub The sewering was part of the Stubbs Bay project. Callahan was informed by Gaffron that the two cabins on the property have existed for many years They are located close to the lake and are non-conforming Gaffron noted there are three buildings currently using the septic system, which does not meet the 3' separation and is located in the 0-75' setback. The septic system needs to be removed. Gaff ron reminded the Council that Maeser was given two years by the Council in May ot 1995 to remove the cabins and required the house to be connected to the sewer. This has not occurred nor has the agreement been signed Brueggemann has proposed to purchase the property to build 2 houses on the less than 2 acre parcel where 5 acres are required. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#8 - #2099 Brueggemann/Maeser - Continued) Callahan asked Maeser if he had any comments. Maeser informed the Council that he was retired and depended on the cabins for income. If he lost that income and was unable to sdl the property as is planned in the proposed application, he said he would be financially bankrupt. Maeser noted that the lots in the neighboring area were all small. He said it was difficult to sell the property as one building site when all the others around him were so small. Maeser said the proposed plan was an opportunity for him to sell and be able to buy another home. Callahan asked Gaffron what the sizes were of neighboring lots. Gaffion noted lots 50 wide made up of a total of 0.2 acres to 1.6 acres. He noted other lots of 3 and 4 acres in the 1 acre zoning district. Hurr noted the nice shoreline on the propeny, the smaller homes to the north and larger homes to the south. Hurr said the lot could be de\ eloped with orientation to the larger lots and could be used for one site. Goetten agreed that the lot was desirable. However, for what the applicant wanted, the proposal does not fit in with the code. Goetten said there were too many variances required and would need to deny the application. There were no public comments. Callahan moved. Goetten seconded, to recommend denial ot Application #2099 and directed Staff to draft a written resolution for the Courcil meeting of February 26, which will incorporate the motion and be adopted. Vote Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#9) #2100 ROBERT AND DEBRA EDMUNDS, 1030 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3675 The applicants were represented by an architectural representative. The property in question is 1 .56 acres in area. All structures on the property will be removed, and a new residence, which will meet all setbacks, will be constructed. Mabusth reported that the original application filed included a request for a conditional use permit for the borrowing of OOO cubic yards of fill Mabusth .said the applicant's architect. Blake Bichanich, reported that the fill would not be borrowed, but instead, would be uained from the excavation for the 2 stor>. 3 stall garage. In this case, the code indicates no conditional use permit is required. A lot width variance is required as the lot is lOr from the normal high water level at the 75' line, where 140' is needed I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#9 - #2100 Robert and Debra Edmunds - Continued) Because of the drainage concern on the property, Mabusth reported that the Engineer reviewed the application and made minor changes. The drainage will flow to the lake and not to the adjoining neighbors. The drainage will flow along the shared lot lines with retaining walls, not over 4' in height, directing the flow. Mabusth noted that the design is a walkout. Kelley moved. Hurt seconded, to approve Resolution #3675. Goetten voiced concern with the 2-story garage with one story underground and any drainage problem ensuing from such a design. Mabusth said the design was approved by the City Engineer. The representative said the drainage would be controlled by a trough between the retaining wails, which would divert any drainage away from the lower level of the house. The area of the residence below grade would be prepared. Goetten asked who would be responsible if the drainage system did not operate as expected, noting past problems with drainage on the property. Mabusth responded that the lot to the north had created problems for this lot, and the applicant has addressed this issue with the channeling of the drainage to the lake. Goetten said she would like assurance that the design will satisly the problem. The representative reported that the problem has been addressed. Callahan questioned what the area was under the garage. The representative said the area provided access to the lower level garage for storage and reported that spancrete will be used for both the upper and lower levels of the garage The purpose of the lower level garage is for boat storage. The representative said the design was an attempt to maximize the need to go down to a certain level. |-jmx received confirmation that the 10' side setbacks would be met. Hurr also inquired if the design exceeded the 1-1/2' overhang requirement. The overhang is 9". Vote; Ayes 4. Nays 0. (»#10) #2101 JEFF BOWEN, CHARLES HOMMEYER AND KEN ROLLAND, 4119, 4125, AND 4127 OAK STREET - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARR.VNGE.MENT AND VACATION OF UNLMPROVED PUBLIC ROADS - RESOLUTION #3676 Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #.^676 of the preliminar>- subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Conceptual appioval was also made of the vacation of the unimproved public road Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 <#11) #2102 HOWARD AND ELIZABETH MCMILL.1N, 1275 LYMAN AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITA^ARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3677 The applicants were present. Mabusth reported that the property is part of the Orono Orchards Highlands plat approved in the 1970's The southeast comer of the property is wetlands, which were not described in angles and bearings on the plat, nor did the City obtain a flowage and conservation easement over the area. The wetland is contiguous with the 30+ acre wetland and drainage s>'stem to the east and south ot the subject property. The proposal is for a v,ildlife pond with a ma.ximum 4 ’ depth and an irregular shoreline requiring a conditional use permit and variance. 270 cubic yards of spoils will be taken out during the winter months, allowed to thaw, and used to contour the banks. The retaining walls currently on the banks have failed. The area currently contains canary reed grass and 40% purple loosestrife in the transitional area of the wetland proposed for alteration. The purpose is to rid the area of these weeds The Corps of Engineers is not convinced that the pra^ie mix will completely eliminate the weeds The McMillan's said it would be an on-going process. Mabusth said the MCWD has approved the plan. Hurr inquired if the 4' depth would allow maintaining open water. Howard McMillan said it would in normal years He added that it has been found that V is the optimal level for water fowl. Mabusth said 4 ’ is the recommendation of the DNR. Lili McMillan said the ability to maintain open water is dependent on the soil, noting clay holds water better. Hurr also asked if it was the applicants' intention to bubble the pond. It is not. Goetten noted that she did not view water in the pictures. Howard McMillan said water is usually found at the end of the marsh area, adding that at one point, it was drained or sluiced to establish the water table but has overgrown with woody plants over the last 30 years The McMillans said there is standing water in the spring, which dries out during the summer months, but remains spongy in August They noted that when the loo.sestrife takes over, the water cannot be seen Lili McMillan noted that when the excavation is done, the water table will be exposed. Goetten asked what the applicants wished to attract to the pond. The McMillans said the purpose was to sustain the wetland. They plan on planting cattails and native grasses, which it has been reported, do not attract geese to a dense area. Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3677. s MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#11 - #2102 Howard and Elizabeth McMillan - Continued) Kelley asked if the variance pertained to Ordinance Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, prohibiting excavation within 25 ’ of wetlands. Mabusth said it was to excavate within the wetland and included the creation of the shoreline. Kelley asked what the hardships were for such a variance. Howard McMillan said the retaining walls were failing. He added that in order to get enough fill to repair the walls, it would cause destruction of the asphalt and the steep grade. McMillan said the hardships, then, were access and fill. Kelley asked the size of the area and the amount of spoils, which are 1.2 acres and 270 cubic yards, respectively. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#12) PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT - OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (SECTION 10.03 SUED. 9C) Gaffron reported that the code concerning oversized accessory structure was being considered for amendment. The current table is based on the individual size of the oversized structure and its corresponding property size. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment, and in light of the few number of variance requests affected by the limit of the table, decided that they would prefer to retain control by requiring a variance and recommended no change be made to the present code. Gaffron asked Council to either agree with this recommendation or to direct the Staff to go forward with the amendment. Hurr said it was a hardship for a resident with 30 acres to need to go through the variance application process as that of a 9 acre parcel. She believes setbacks are an issue. Hurr said she would prefer to see a sliding scale and would support an extended table. Kelley said he would prefer the code remain as it exists noting that the majority of 10 acre and over parcels with eventually be subdivided. Goetten said she agreed with Kelle>' considering the small amount of parcels that would be affected. She did not believe it was necessary to legislate for all but would like review of larger parcels which could have an impact. Callahan directed Gaffron that the Council were 3 (Callahan, Kelley, and Goetten) to I (Hurr) in maintaining the current code. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 1996 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Callahan inquired about the Oberiiauser application concerning the removal of structures on the subject property. According to the last Council meeting discussion regarding this application, the Council had agreed to move forward with legal action if the structures were not removed. This has not been done, and Callahan asked if legal action could now proceed. Banett said no action had yet been taken but was willing to proceed. It was noted that the performance bond previously requested of Oberhauser had not been acted upon. Kelley, Goetten, and Hurt agreed with Callahan to proceed with legal action. Callahan asked Barrett to look into the matter. Kelley reported that the committee of the Highway 12 moratorium met. 1 here were differing opinions with some opining that the moratorium was premature j’.nce the Highway Corridor issue remains unresolved, and others feeling the opposite It was noted that the committee is made up of Council Members Kelley, Goetten, and Callahan, and Planning Commissioners Peterson, Smith, and Lindquist. Hurr inquired where Staff was with the Maxwell Bay access agreement. Galfron reported that it had not yet been drafted Hurr noted the need tor more information and research of the different formulas for payments in lieu of taxes. ENGINEER REPORT Cook had no report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#13) BID AWARD - EQl'IP.MENT AND MATERIALS BID 1996 Moorse reported that the bids for equipment and materials for 199t» were being considered for award to the lowest bidders. Callahan asked if the City had dealt with those making the low bids in the past and if they were reputable Gerhardson said he had and considered them reputable. Kelley inquired if this was the best time of the year to bid for materials. Gerhardson said this time of the year has historically been the best time to obtain bids. Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to accept the low bids for materials as specified. Vote; Aves 4, Navs 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCtt. MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (*#14) SEASONAL ROAD WEIGHT LIMITS - RESOLUTION #3678 Kelley moved, Goettcn seconded, to adopt Resolution #3678 establishing the 1996 Weight Limits for City streets from March 15 through May 15, 1996. Vote: Ayes 3, Navs 0. (#15) 1995 REFUNDING BONDS - AMENDED RESOLUTION #3679 Moorse reported that the resolution is an amendment to the resolution approving the ^e of the 1995 GO. Refunding Bonds and relates to simplying the accounting for the debt service of the refunding bonds by consolidating the v arious portions of the new debt from the Water Fund, the Sewer Fund and the new Debt Serv ice Fund into one Debt Service Fund Staff has been working with the bond attorney and the bond consultant to provide a resolution which accomplishes this. The amended resolution was written by the bond attomev and reviewed by the bond consultant and staff. Callahan clarified that the purpose was to establish a new fund in which the debt service would be accounted. Callahan moved, Murr seconded, to adopt Resolution #3679. providing for accounting treatment of sewer revenues and assessments. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#16) AMENDMENTS TO 1996 TAX LEVY RESOLUTION #3680 AND DEBT SERVICE BUDGET RESOLUTION #3681 Moorse reported that the Debt Service Budget resolution involved spending in 1996 to call the 1989 bonds at a cost of appro.ximately $1.5 million dollars, which is the proceeds from the sale of the refunding bonds. Callahan asked if this affects the legality of the bonds to which Moorse replied to the negative. Callahan moved, Hurr seconded to adopt Resolution #3680 amending the final 1995 Ta.x Levy collectible in 1996 for Debt Service. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt Resolution #3681 amending the 1996 Debt Service Budget. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. IVUNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#17) REPLACEMENT OF nSHING PIER DOCKS Moorse provided information requested by the CouncU regarding the life expectancy and the winter transportation and storage of the fishing pier docks being considered for replacement purposes. There is a minimum of 20 year life on the all aluminum, both deck and structure, docks. The docks will be transported by either towing or by a flat bed trailer, which the City has for such uses, to the Public Works rear yard area. The docks will be 32’ in length, which does not exceed the 40 ’ maximum allowed for towing. Hurr said the memo should state that the docks should be transported, not can be. Kelley asked if there was an annual maintenance plan. Gerhardson ^d he did not expect there to be any maintenance required. The docks are painted but with a paint that should not wear oflf. It was noted that the current docks are in six 8’ sections. Gerhardson said he did not order any longer docks due to the need and ability for transportation Kelley asked how the height of the docks can be changed, Gerhardson said this can be accomplished on shore. Kellev inquired about theft proofing of the docks. Gerhardson said there will be removable hitches. He also said that stabilizer posts are used to anchor the docks. It was questioned whether there w as a possibility for more accidents with an aluminum type of dock. Gerhardson said the dock has rounded edges and has a non-slip surface. He said the chance for injury was no greater than that of the current wood docks. Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the purchase of two Hewitt 4 ’x32' straight docks from Eckloff*Docks at a cost of S3,538 07 to be funded from the Park Fund. Vote Aves 4, Nays 0. (#18) ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ALLOCATION OF CDBG FUNDS Moorse reported that a date needed to be established for a public hearing regarding the allocation of the annua! CDBG grant The allocation amount is approximately the same as for the past year Moorse noted the recommendations made by Staff for the CDBG allocation. He brought to the attention of the Council the reduction in the human service area. The County has u.rected that human services expenditures not exceed 20% of the total grant amount. This has caused reductions in the grant amounts for human service agencies. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#18 - CDBG Funds - Continued) Kelley asked if residents of Orono can apply for the housing rehabilitation grant. Moorse reported that they can. Gerhardson said the highest need from residents has been tor weatherization, windows, and roofing. Kelley inquired about using the funds for sewering. Gerhardson said this has been done but is not part of this grant program. Kelley asked how the grant program is publicized. Gerhardson said information is carried in the local papers. He said the program is well known and widely used. Kelley inquired who makes the decision on who receives the funds. Gerhardson said it is on a first come, first serve, basis with qualifying factors, and is administered by the County. Callahan inquired about the negative balance in the housing rehabilitation area and was told that there is not enough money available to fund current grant applications. Callahan asked if more fundingcan be provided to the Human Service agencies by the City through other sources. Moorse said this could be done through the general fund Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to conduct a public hearing at 7:00 p m on March 11, 1996 in the Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, to receive citizen input regarding the allocation of Community Development Block Grant Funds for 1996. Moorse noted the receipt of a letter, which was distributed to Council members, from Westonka Intervention regarding their grant request. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. r#19) SEASONAL GOLF STAFF PAY SCHEDULE Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to approve a pay range of S6.00 to $6.90 per hour lor the seasonal golf clubhouse staff for 1996. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. (ff20) PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE REPLACEMENT .Moorse reported that the one-ton dump truck, which is a 1984 vehicle with over 90.000 miles, is ready for replacement. The budgeted amount for this replacement, however, did not include the dump bo.\ and plow, only the cost of the truck (cab and chassis). This has resulted in the need to reallocate funds which were designated for a 1/2 ton pick-up truck replacement to the one-ton dump truck replacement. Moorse informed Callahan that the bid was received through the County's cooperative purchasing process 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#20 - Public Works Vehicle Replacement - Continued) Huit moved, Goetten seconded, to authorize the purchase of a one-ton cab and chassis from Erickson Chevrolet at a cost of $24,324 as per the Hennepin County bid; and to amend the budget by increasing the Park's one-ton truck appropriation by $ 12,000 and reducing the Public Works pick-up truck appropriation by $12,000. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#21) INSURANCE BID AWARD Moorse reported that the award is for approval of the bulk of insurance premiums for 1996 The insurance costs are favorable as they came in under budget and under the 1995 figures The amount does include an increase in certain coverages. WTien questioned by Goetten about the lower costs, Moorse said the Workers Compensation legislation has changed, which affected the costs, as well as the good experience rating of the City Barrett inquired if there was joint powers coverage. Moorse said the only joint powers coverage the City has is through Logis, noting that normally the joint powers agency carries the joint powers coverage. Tom Kuchn added that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District also has a joint powers coverage. Also present at the meeting was Carl Bennetsen of R. L. Youngdahl & Associates. Inc., the City's agent of record Callahan noted that all fees showed a reduction except for that of the agency. Kuehn noted that the City changed agents late in 1995 due to the retirement of the past agent ot record. The past agent received a flat fee plus commissions where Youngdahl & Associates receives a flat tee-for-ser\ice only. Therefore, the current fees are lower than the previous fees. l lurr questioned why there was the need for an agent of record when the insurance was cov ered through the League of Cities. Bennetsen responded that the workers compensation can be conducted directly but the experience and knowledge an agent has can alleviate confusion as well as keep abreast of changes. The agent follows up on claims as well as analyzing the package policies. The agent analyzes the City's exposure, obtains credits, and maintains the proper coverage. Bennetsen said the commercial insurance needs are more complicated than that of an individual. Kuehn added that each City has unique requirements It was noted that a Staff person could act as an agent but would require licensing. The League requires an agent-of- record so the brunt of the needs regarding insurance don't fall on the League itself Moorse said he did not believe it was worth the time and expenses to train an employee plus the time to follow up on any claims. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#21 - Insurance Bid Award - Continued) Kelley asked where the City has a boiler, which was noted in the insurance tabulation. Bennetsen said this category includes pumps, motors, and transformers, although not fuel pumps. There is no boiler, per se. Kelley inquired what would happen if there was a fuel leak. Bennetsen said this would fall under a pollution liability. Hun asked where the liability insurance for the golf course was cov ered. Kuehn said the golf course was covered under the City's general liability insurance and paid its pro-rata share of the costs. Hurt inquired if all of the employees were bonded. Bennetsen said they were. Callahan asked if there w as a civil rights insurance coverage for the City. Bennetsen said the League guides the insurance according to the needs of the City and cov ers most of that. Banett asked if there was an absolute pollution exclu.Mon, to which, Bennetsen said no. Barrett asked to receive the policy form for review. Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to award the insurance effective January 1, 1996 to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for the comprehensive municipal property and casualty package $73,574, for the umbrella e.xcess liability $17,758, for the petrofund reimbursement $739, for the open meeting law $795, for the boiler and machinery $1,201, and for the surety bonds, $876. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (ff22) PARTICIP.MTON IN L/\KE-WTDE GOOSE CONTROL GRANT APPLICATION Moorse reported that the grant application was tor a Minnetonka lakewide goose control program for the surrounding cities. The cities are joining together with the University of Minnesota to apply for the LCMR matching grant, which is a 2 year control etfort. The cost to the City would be a $1,000 per year maximum expenditure for a two year time period. Moorse said the amount could be reduced if neighborhoods continued funding the goose control program This has been done in the Pheasant Lawn neighborhood. Hurr said she did not believ e the priv ate individuals would pay for such a program if the City was willing to pay for it Hurr does not believe the program will work as relocation of ”cese is not being done anymore .Moorse said other options arc being considered MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (#22 - Goose Control Grant Application - Continued) Goetten noted the different number of control efforts for different parts of the lake, and asked how it would work if each City spends the same. Goetten questioned whether this was a fair distribution. Moorse said the table indicates where the goose control is currently happening, which may change. He noted that the grant needed to be in by February 23 Callahan said he noted that the last time this subject was brought forward, there were residents who preferred the geese to stay where they are. He did not believe the program would be successful without more funding. Goetten commented that goose control was an on-going matter. Hurr was told that the goose control was not on public land only. Hurr said she feels the people affected should be the ones that pay for the control Moorse noted the park areas where geese were being remov ed, adding that private parties will continue paying for such a program citing a Minnetonka example. Goetten asked if there have been any other Orono residents, other than those at Pheasant Lawn, who have voiced a need for goose population control. Moorse said there have not been any complaints. Goetten said she was not in tavor ot the grant application. Callahan noted the low dollar amount and the number of participating cities. Hun- commented that if the grant approval was needed in order to get the $1,000, she did not believe the grant would be obtained. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to deny the City ’s participation in the goose control grant application and the expenditure of a maximum of $1,000 per year for the years 1997 and 1998 for a lake area goose control program Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett said the MPRS report would be taken up at the next Council meeting and had no additional report at this time. i • •MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12,1996 (•#23) LICENSES KeUey moved, Goctten seconded, to approve the following licenses; Vote; Ayes 3. Nays 0. On>Sale Non-lntoiicating Liquor License Lakeview Golf of Orono Grant Wenkstem 405 North Arm Drive Solicitation License Alan L. Penke 'The Rose Man" @ parking lot of 3445 Shoreline Dr. (•#24) BILLS Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to approve the payment of the All Funds Account, Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the meeting at 9;00 p.m. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk '-•r *T •» “ •tv-. aan-H ■. -A-fl JBn "Hfr - - ^__ <0 I S a u O tJ wO g a. *> o uao's § I ^ ti o - ii3 c =* „ "•as^ a:§ -f!tiuctui e - Re • Vana Use Pi^lil ® i! ^ T1 wa %j B >y cu 1 a C5 . t »*«• VI nSTRATOR’S REPOR - Status Report of Rcnii cott Ball, 1065 West Fci lam and Laura Stoddard, Biekcr, 2440 Old Bcacj endment. Section 10.2011 B li K < H 1 X ,W>o ^ fiu os ^* H 2j OS e HC3 o V 0 d «J1 t. w • 51 « Cli II1 alls3 s.c/1 < c ^ ^ .2 - 55 ■s 5 -tig-il Ua ^O o: v-J \d r*^ oi u i:y o ^ K U w 05 q’^ W f: Oil P u _ ^ ti ^ ol^ O ^ o 3 fa A u_1 1 V*-, ^ V1 % /\i<? , 1 1 w 1 * m s Q 1 h\ u) § <o § IS. I; t._. •.* •»•— \ <3«-- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 22, ITEM NO.: ^ \ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zonins: Item Description: Louis Oberhauser, 2405 Dunwoody Avenue, 3865/3877 Shoreline Drive - Status Report on the Removal of Hazardous Structures At the Februaiy 12, 1996 meeting of the Council. Council directed the City Attorney to consider all options available to the City regarding the removal of the hazardous buildings (two boarded up residence structures) on the Oberhauser property. On February lath I received a call from Lou Oberhauser's secretarv' informing me that the boarded up structures were to be burned the following Saturday. February 17th. She advised that Oberhauser was still out of town and that she would be contacting utility companies to have lines cut along with the removal of the gas and electrical meters. Staff asked that she draft a letter to confirm these arrangements. I received a second call the same day advising that the utility companies cc-ild not complete required cut offs to permit the bum on the following Saturday as a two week lea ine would be required. The fire chief has reconfirmed that the bum would take place on Saturday, March 2nd. Staff can also confirm that Minnegasco has been in contact with the building staff on February' 15th advising that they would begin the process of the removal of meters and the cutting of lines. The enclosed letter from Mr. Oberhauser ’s fimi confirms these facts. (The letter was drafted by Mr. Oberhauser's secretary and proofed by Jack Neveaux, Oberhauser ’s business associate and/or partner.) If the burn is completed on March 2nd, staff seeks pemiission to reschedule the Oberhauser preliminary subdiv ision application before the Council at their March 11. 19% meeting. Please note that final subdiv ision approval will be delayed until the remaining residence structure and detached garage are removed. FES-1T-1S?<5 1T:1c .Qg£=HHi.i-iEP c. OBERHAUSER & NEVEAUX AfARTNCRSHIf PiCO#eSSlCMAl CC.'R?v;k ATIO v AT7C/^P^ C0(JNSIL0R:> /•r LA iV 1421 CAST WAYZATA BOUI fVARD - SUITC 210 WAYZAT.A, K\lNNCbOTA 55W1 LOUIS B.OBCRH ai.'SER' lAO: NEVCAUX* •A Aa>0CA8t'O«« Febiruary IS, 1996 ORCNO CITY OFFICES Attention: Ms. Jeanne A. Mabustn, P.O. Box 66 Ci'vstal Bay, Minnesota 5532S VIA FACSIMILE 473-0510 AND BY MAIL Re: OBERHAUSER ACRES/LOUIS B. OBERHAUSER Oux Pile: 1418-1 Dear Ms. Mabuoth: On February 13, 1996, I was informed by the Mound Firs Chief, Steven EricJ^son, that the structures at 3865 and 3875 Shoreline Drive, Orono, were scheduled to be burned down on Saturday at 10:00 a.m., February 17, 1996. Mr. Erickson asked that we make arrangements v;ith Minr.egasco and Northern States Power to have gas lines cut leading to the structures, the removal of the gas meters, cutting the electrical wires and the removal of the electrical meters. Upon contacting Minnegasco, I was informed that Febiruary 17, 1996 was not an acceptable date, due to the fact that Minnegasco had to the lines leading to the structures and because of the winter v/eather conditions, it would take 3 to 4 days just to thaw frocer. graunc in order to reach the lines. In addition, Minnegasco needed several days advance notice to cut lines to homes and time to obtain permits. Steve Erickson then scheduled the burning for Saturday, Marc.n 1996 v;hich was the earliest date the fire department could do j ob. A, the .-n order was placed with Minr.egasco cn February 14, 1995 to k-11 lines and r^srnove meters before March. 2, 1996.. ■ I d \17! 1.$t OEEPHFtU^ER Z r£‘.'EHU:<» P.h &1247~7i!53 P.CC 02 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth February 15, 1996 Page 2 An order to cut wires was placed with Northern States Power on February 14, 1996 and they have assured me those wires would be cut and the meters would be removed before March 2, 1996. I have contacted Randy Valek of Valek Trucking and Sxcavatincj and made arrangements to have Mr. Valek clean up all the remainina debris after the structures have been burned. As a courtesy I contacted the next door neighbors at 242 5 Dunwocdv Avenue and informed th/^m of the scheduled burning. If you have any questions, please let me know. LE0;eiw cc; Steven Erickson LOUIS b^^Serkaussr total p.or. Cv ^0- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ % DATE: February 2s1^>996 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2104 B. Scott Ball, 1065 West Ferndale Road - Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential. 2 Acres, Sewered Application: Remove existing home and replace with new residence conforming to 30' side setback, 75' lake setback and meeting hardcover regulations Variances requested include lot area, lot width and aveiage lakeshore setback. List of Exhibits A - Resolution B C Notice of Planning Commission Action 1/17/96 Planning Commission Minutes 1/16/96 D - Site Plan/Grading Plan E - Grading Plan Cross Section F - Topographic Survey G - Citv' Engineer's Approval Letter H - Hardcover Revised Plan Memo and Exhibits of 1/9/96I Discussion Plea.se review the memo and exhibits of January 9, as well as the current grading plans. Briefly, the applicants in November received Planning Commission approval for a bay window expansion on the lakeside of the existing house, which is in the 0-75' zone. In December, applicants withdrew that request and applied for the necessary variances to remove the existing house and construct a totally new residence meeting the lake and side setback requirements. Existing lot area is 0.88 acres in this sewered 2 acre zone. The lot is large enough to accommodate the proposed house, decks, sidewalks and driveway within the 25% hardcover limit in the 75-250' zone. While the new house will be moved further from the lake than the existing house, the confiiiuraiion of the neighboring properties still results in the need for an average lakeshore setback variance. Neither of the adjacent properties will have existing lake views negatively impacted by this plan. ________________ 4 t Request for Council Action continued Page 2 of 2 Febniarv 23, 1996 Zoning File <1^2104 B. Scott Ball, 1065 West Femdale Road Planning Commission Recommendation At their January' meeting. Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the lot area, lot width and average setback variances, subject to two conditions: 1. Revised plan is necessary to meet 25% hardcover limit (this has been done, see Exhibit H). Staff/City Engineer to review and approve grading and drainage plans prior to final Council action (see grading plans and Engineer's approval letter, Exhibits D and G). It should be noted that the garage portion of the new construction will be lowered slightly from the original proposal. This will result m a balancing of fill on the site and eliminate the need tor a conditional use permit. Also note that approximately 500 yards of fill will be needed to fill the excavation remaining when the old house is removed. The City Engineer recommends that this occur prior to the March 15 road posting to minimize potential for damage to West Ferndale Road. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot area, lot width and average lakeshore setback variances per the fmdiiigs and conditions of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by____, seconded by____, to adopt Resolution No. granting lot area, lot width and average lakeshore setback variances to B. Scott Ball of 1065 West Femdale Poad for construction of a new single family residence to replace the existing residence stmcture. Vote:aves.navs. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 FILE NO. 2104 WHEREAS, Scott and Eleanor Ball (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners ot the property located at 1065 West Femdale Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, RLS No. 1372, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23. Subdivision 6 (B) to allow construction of a new residence structure on a lot of 0.88 acres in area where 2 acres in crea is normally required, and on a lot of existinu width 180' at the shoreline and 163' at the 75' setback line, both locations at which minimum lot width is required to be 200', and a rariance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow an average setback encroachment of 13' for the proposed house and 19' for the proposed deck where no encroachment is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was review'ed as Zoning File #2104. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District and is provided with municipal sewer. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 16, 1996 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following tindinas: Pace 1 of 5 4. D. A. The existing residence to be removed is non-conforming in that it is less than 30' from the side lot line and less than 75’ from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. Further, the existing hardcover on the property is excessive as compared to the hardcover limits imposed by the Orono Zoning Code. B. The existing residence will be removed and will be replaced by a new residence structure including decks, sidewalks and driveway, all of which meet the 75' lakeshore setback, 30’ side setbacks and 25% hardcover limit within the 75-250' zone. The proposed site plan meets these requirements within the confines of the existing substandard area and width lot. The property, while in a 2 acre zone, is provided with municipal sewer which eliminates any concerns about septic system needs. C. The curved shoreline configuration results in the need for an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 13' by the house and 19' by the decks. Neither of the adjacent residence structures will have existing views of the lake impacted by the proposed construction, and in fact their views of the lake may be improved by removal of the existing house. D. The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the proposed site grading and drainage plans. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the elfect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the communiiy. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect trafllc conditions, light, air nor pose aVire hazard or other danger to neighboring propertv" would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessarv' to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Pace 2 of 5 r CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above tindings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) lo allow the construction of a new residence on a lot of 0.88 acres in area where a 2 acre minimum lot area is normally required, and where e.xisting lot width is 180' at the shoreline and 163 ’ at the 75’ setback line where a 200’ lot width is normally required, and grants a vyiance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow average lukeshore setback encroachment ot 13 tor the proposed new house and 19' for the proposed new deck where no average setback encroachment is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall adhere to the site plan and grading plan attached to this resolution as E.xhibit A and shall adhere to the 25% hardcover limit in the 75- 250’ zone per the hardcover plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. No variances other than lot area, lot widtli and average lakeshore setback are approved with this resolution. Applicants and applicants ’ contractors shall conduct all hauling of necessary fill materials on Ciw roads in accordance with posted maximum weights. Applicants shall provide a map of the haul route to the City for approval prior to commencing hauling of materials. Applicant shall be responsible for cleaning the surface of any paved public street that becomes soiled due to the construction activity on this project. For safety reasons and in times of inclement weather or early thaw, the City shall have the authority to stop all haulinu activitv until such time that the City determines necessary. 4.Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to any grading operations, subject to review by the City. mm 5..Authorities granted by this variance tun with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date ot Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February' 26. 1997). Page 3 of 5 6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically tenninate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of Februar>-, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STA TE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foreeoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day ot Februaiy, 1996 by F.dward J. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf of the City. Notary Public Pace 4 of 5 . ' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of .199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County , personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and forsaidCounty, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and ackno\vled2ed that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 y CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SSSIJ 473-7357 TO: B. Scott Ball 1065 West Femdale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ZONING FILE #2104 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 17, 1996 COPIES: George Stickne>’ Burnet Realty 315 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 01/16/96 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following; Approval subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Revise plan as necessary' to meet 25% hardcover limit. Staff/City Engineer to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to final Council actiori. You will be advised if any changes are required. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; City Council, Monday, February 12, 1996, meeting starts at 7;00 p.m. If vou desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planmng Commission. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONCVflSSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 16, 1996 \ <r X (#13 > #2102 Haward and Elizabeth McMillan - Continued) \Howard McMillan said it was their attempt to combat in a non-toxic way the elimination of the purple looseleaf ih the non-excav-ation areas. He said they were trying^to redevelop cattails and create a normal namral state. Lili McMillan noted the approval of the project by their neighbors to the east and west. She also said the MOW’D has been notified but still need to contact the Corp of Engineers. Schroeder read into the minutes a letter from a neighbor, Pesak, approving the plan. Schroeder informed the applicants of the Plamjni£Commissions' standard for a namral setting around the pond area. Mabasth sai^the Engineer has cited the plan as an excellent example of providing transitional areas within the irregular shoreline and graduated slopes. Smith reiterated the desire of the Commission to not have any "pre^ pond" applications and to meet fierformance standards. Lindquist noted that the application is in line with this standard with the use of prainc restoration mix and the designed slope. Howard Mchfillan commented that he realized the 3-5' depth is normal to create a viildl^e habitat. Smith mov^, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2102 for a CUP/variance aUowinglfor an open water area with a conservation easement and conditions 1-5 as stipui& in the Staff memo. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#14) #2104 B. SCOTT BALL, 1065 WEST FERNDALE ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARLNG - 11.05-11:15 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. 'The applicant was represented by George Slickney. Gaffron recalled the Ball application from several months ago regarding the installation of bay windows in the existing house. The applicants have decided, and now propose, that the best option is to remove the existing house and driveway and build a new home. Stickney informed the Commission on the transformation from remodeling to a new home. He noted that the proposal would now orient the house well on the lot. It was noted how the averase Lakeshore line on the property swings in towards the home. IT m MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 16. 1996 (#14 - #2104 B. Scott Ball - Continued) Gaffi'on condi.ued that the proposal calls for lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore setback variances. The property consists of .88 acres in the 2-acre zoning district. The property docs not meet the 200' lot width requirement wth 180* width and 163’ at the 75 ’ line. The 75 ’ setback is met. The proposal is for a conforming 30* side setback. The hardcover needs to be adjusted slighriy to meet the 25% limit. Gafifron reponed that the existing house is located all in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed house would be located with a slight encroachment of that line but has no impact on lake views ergoyed by the neighboring properties. Gaffron noted that the new plan has not yet been reviewed by the City Engineer. The garage proposed at 938 ’ would need to be contoured to the 940’ elevation. Three feet of fill would be required to the basement level to bring the elevation from 932.5’ to 935’ to meet the flood plain requirements. The fill would need to come up to the driveway. Gaffron said the City files show a historic concern with the drainage to the neighboring property to the east. This will be reviewed by the Engineer so as not to impact the neighbors. Gaffron said the Engineer’s review will occur prior to the application going before the Council.. Stickney noted that there was very little slope or elevation change to the proposal. Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2104 the hardcover meeting the 25®/o allowed, the drainage and grading plans to be reviewed and approved by the Engineer prior to final Council action. Vote: Ayes 4. Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#15) #2103 ORONO HOCKEY BOOSTERS, INC. 1025 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO.AD NORTH - CONCEPTUAL PLAN REVTEW Mabusth noted that the agenda item w^ for 4 Im not legally combined all of their owned parcels and have buddings and uses that expand from one parcel to another. A lease period of 35-55 years is proposed with an option to purchase at any time. Mabusth said the major issue for this application is a land use matter as ere is exact fit for this use within the City code. ourvoy ror Scott fc Bl#>Annr R«11 1065 Mttst Ferndale Road Orono« MN Phone: 473.1450 Book 347 Page 41 File Total Lot Area; 38,230.5 sa.ft.l Proposed Grading Plan for New House. Existing House A Court Area to be Removed. Basement of Existing House to be Pilled to Proposed Grade. Prop. Elev.vjT^T^ Prop. 1st Fl.Elev. Prop. Gar.Fl.Elev. ^ Prop. Baa.Fl.Elev. 932.^ Drainage Arrows ----------- a '^o Scale: 1"»30' • Denotes Iron Mon.Found Description: Tract -A'* R.L.S. No. 1372, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Construction to be limited to existino court nreai drive area and existing house. Construction Limits . . . . . . . . Existino Topo - - - - Proposed Topo- -• • - Fill Old Basement (48»x 36* Fill 6* Avg.) Cut New Basement (86* X 32» Cut 4.5' Deep) Sand Fill Garage (36* X 24* Kill 3' Avg.) 384 cu. yd. 501 cu. yd. 96 cu. yd. Fill Drive (50* X 70' Fill 3' Deep Avg.) Needed cu. yd. Kill for Job 3O8 cu. yd. 367 cu. yd. ♦ 10% or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. V' /■ jse« I. yd. !• yd. !• yd. !• yd. I. yd. •) « € Dc c ^ •H •4 i4 fHf \ CM CM \ CM oco orr N •H u •t4 Xa tcu O'ao U <H <0•s ^ 0«f) 8 U «Hr B S V > V. K 1 I • » I.' l! •O to^ ac o O i4 10 0i co o !-• *H 41 O' O c :3 •H U4J «) to^ sM u o 4icou •oo 4J IVo •H IM IM O >1 u co •Hmouu ou Bou %4 s CO ao i « vQ V; •n ^ 5 0 I lit M-r» (T- N rs j M/ 0 N 00 V) tn O' y- hfy (S N 1 A ^ i -K IV UNo r 2-22-1‘2^?6 5;53R1 FP£>1 BG^ESTRU0 * ASSOC 612 636 1^11 P. I l/i I Bonestroo Rosene &~B Anderlik & ^ 1 Associates Engineers & Architects »oncstr^. t05cne. Anderhk and A34W?t<:j. •} fn. Ati'wCduai 0&fi>vr;unIty Otfd G Soeiesff^ I Roearr W Ro^ena. PC* ieiea^ C AntfeH.fc. p e Mji L. . Ofv»ia. P E Richard e. 7urn«f. PX. Gitm R. C;>0lc. f.E. Thomas c. Noyts pj. RoOen O- Jc'»writcr*c. p €• M Coertm. C R-A • • Scr^ior C3»^*u*t^r Michaet Cly»Kfi PC jamas R Ma«ar>d. PC j< rrv o. PettMCh. PI Scon J. ArgancK P C February 22, 1996 Ho«aard A Sanfoca. P C naitn A Gordon. f C. Rooart R pfefrena. pc Richard w. foster. p,C. Pav«d O. losAoiP. PI RODCft C. RwJSC* A I.A. Jerry A. Bourdon. P C. A H*in»art. P f MicnaeS T tauemanrv P C. TedK field. PC Thomai R Anderson. A I A A Rick Sctemdl P C James R Rosenmerkei P t Osie A Grove, P C Oeneid C K.»^erdt P i. Thorras A SylkO. P C frederic J Stenfccrg Pi rsmeei Martinet. P I Mfcnaei p Rau pf Thomij ’4/ P»»*rson. PC K Gage f TodJ fontr. P ( iceim « vae# p k Douoias Benoit PI kcr?nelh P AndRrjon. P f Q. OuTtRfSan PX- Mark R RCifl. PX Mart A. Se o. P C. Oary ^ Marten. p« Paul J Ganrson. A.IA Daniel J Cdgerton. P C. Ph (o J C jyweit P C V<srk 0 I'ellfl, Pf Miles 9 Jensen, P£ L Pniilip Gra^iei. P f Karen t a lamen P f Gary O. KriftoMJ. PC. CfCiliO Oirvi^r. PC Aer>i J. Wagner. PC p.a^ 9. jorvt P Gorder. R C Dan O. Boyum. P C Jeffrey J iniermcer. P £. Joseph R Rhem. P C. Lee M Manei. PI Oarie* A Er^dsoo Leo k? Paw«-i-.fcy Hanjn vi Cum Agnes tl Jarnes f. Cngair arm Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building 3nd Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Scott Ball Residence File No. 139-2104 Dear Jeanne. Wc have n »»;sscd the revised survey and grading plan prepared today for the prOF)Osed re.sidencc of Scott and t .j4iinor Ball at 1065 West Fcrndalc Road. The surveyor h.as performed a bench loop to vtrin t* *l*.vations at the site. The grading plan and fill calculations arc acceptable. The fill required cs.nvrjuct the garage and driveway appears to be below 100 cubic yards which should not require a cc; vjudl use pcrmii. The total fill i.iat must be hauled into the site, including that for the old basement, may be as much as 500 cubic yards (loose volume). Tiic applicant should conduct all hauling on Citv- roads prior to March 15, 1996. when the roads will be piostcd for a maximum weight of 5 tens per axle. A map of the haul route should be provided to the Citv' for approval prior to commencing with the work. Hie applicant should be responsible tor cleaning the surtace ot any paved public street that becomes soiled due to the construction activities on this project. For safety reasons and m times ot inclement weather or early th.aw. the Citv- must have the authority to stop all hauling activity until such time that the City determines neccssar>’. The erosion control measures should be inplaoe prior to any grading operations. The operations should be monitored and inspected to verity that adequate compaction ot the till is obtained to support the proposed structure. Depending on the ^-pe of fill and moisture contenmt may be necessary to perform density' testing of the comp.acted fill. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BON*ESTROO. ROSENT. /_'.T)ERLIK ASSOCIAllfS. INC, Shawn D. Gustafson. P.£. B' j -•t»<<“';T>'>- 4. 'I ' I'" ,n - 2<-|>0O ;X (/Oft^ TO 67 i' S.OO sf'') i * • TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Conunission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator D.ATE:Janiiarv 9, 1996 SUBJECT: #2104 B. Scott Ball, 1065 West Femdale Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential. 2 acres, sewered. Application: Remove c.xisting home and replace with new residence conforming to 30* side setback. 75 ’ lake setback and meeting hardcover regulations. Variances requested include lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore setback. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Ovvuers List D - Survey C - Elevation Views F - Floor Plans G - Staff Hardcover R.view Note At your November meeting. Planning Commission recommended approval of the new bay windows on the lake side of the existing house. Howev er, applieant has since reconsidered and now proposes to construct a totally new residence. Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.23. Subd. 6(B): A. ' tinimum lot area lequ 1 = 2 acres F.xistii g ^ O.SS acres B.Minimum lot width Required = 200 ’ Existinu width = 180’ at shoreline and 163’ at 75 ’ .setback line C. Required side yard = 30’ (no variance proposed) Zoning File #2104 January 9, 1996 Page 2 2. J. Section 10.22, Subd. 1: Average setback encroachment not allowed (existing encroachment = 50'; proposed encroachment — house. 13, deck. 19). Section 10.22, Subd. 2/Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L): Hardcover in 75-250’ zone limited to 25% (no variance proposed). Discussion Applicant proposes to construct a new residence to replace the existing residence The new house is proposed to meet the required 30 ’ side setbacks and the 75’ lakeshore setback. The new house will be set back approximately 35 ’ further inland than the existing house, and will include a 6’ deck also meeting the 75’ setback. The averace setback line defined in applicant’s previous application confirms the existing house encroaches approximately 50’ past the average setback. The new construction will encroach only 13 ’ with the new house, or 19 ’ total encroachment including the proposed 6’ deck. The neighboring house to the east will be only minimally impacted by this encroachment, and due to existing'^vegetation will likely have virtually none of its lake views reduced by the proposed construction. The proposed construction includes an attached garage and a redesigned driveway. This may require some fill on the site, and therefore due to past concerns about drainage and its impact on the neichboring property to the east, it would be appropriate for the applicant to provide a grading and drainage ^.ian for the City Engineer to review. Further, because no cutting of e.xistin«’ tirades in the 0-75’ zone will be allowed to accommodate the proposed basement windows "(existing foundation will have to be filled to match existing 0-75’ grades) the elevation of the basement floor is critical. That floor level must be at least 932.5 ’ to meet flood plain ordinance requirements, which would leave approximately 4-4.5’ of till above the basement floor on the lake side of the house, or even 5’ if the grade is established to dram away from the house. Again, these elevations and a complete grading plan are critical to the City s approval of this request. Hardcover Review In the previous application, stall defined that the 75-250’ zone contain 24,600 s.f., which would allow hardcover in the amount of 25'io or 6.150 s.f. The site plan as submitted and reviewed by staff in Exhibit G includes as follows: Zoning File #2104 January 9, 1996 Page 3 Decks - Driveway/sidewalk/tumaround House/garage - Total 322 s.f. 2,742 s.f. 3.380 s.f 6.444 s.f (26.2%) Minor adjustments to decks and driveway will be necessary’ to reduce by 300 s.f to the 25% level. Items for Discussion 1.Does Planninc Commission ha%e any conceptual or specific problems with the requested lot area and vddth variances (which are inherent in this sewered property) or the a\erage setback encroachment? Does Planning Commission wish to review the grading and drainage plans once they are received? Is it necessaiy or appropriate to table the application until the drainage plans are submitted, or is Planning Commission comfortable with a recommendation of conceptual approval subject to those plans being submitted and accepted by staff prior to re^'iew of this application by the City Council? 3. Does Planning Commission have any other issues regarding this proposal? Staff Recommendation If Planning Commission feels that the requested lot area, lot width and average setback variances are justified and supported by adequate hardship, and it Planning Commission js comfortable conceptually with the hardcover plan subject to minor adjustments to meet die 25% limit, then a recommendation for approval would be appropriate, subject to staff review and approval of the final hardcover proposal and site grading plans, prior to final Council action. Options for .Action 1. Approve as proposed, subject to staff review and approval of grading^'drainage plan prior to finai Council action. Table pending receipt of gradinii'drainage plan, 3. Denial (specify reasons). 4.Other. .-y C, !<■- f / i j f , / i \ #• - f Ll-O I CITY OF OROXO - VARIANCE APPLICATION 210*^ Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S20^gJ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) / / . %A V 4 r PROPERTY INFORMATION . Site Address /o^S" (Ajejr A t Oro /Vv. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_____( Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Propertv' Acquired ------------—(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; -J residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: APPLICANT Name S> S/^y=L Phonethome^ Cn- *f7S- ^1^50 Phone(worlc) ~ ^S’o ~ ^ Address: t./ _C\VjT /WAZ-Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __________________ Phoneihome) Phone (work)_ Address;_ City:Zip; description of reqltst_ _ _ FsTimated Construction CctftS 9oo,o>^o j Describe request indetail: To> -.y A^cL:— ^xctcr b± V.ARLANCES REQUIRED U Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover over Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear j/_ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCPJPTION of UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Desenbe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unus^ f r o’compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Zj /-----------^— — ^------------T7 1 ^ I V Urik c* r-Ctt (aftach additional sheets if necessary) . /, li Lc\rJ ->(/- /o a u^‘ If ' ./Lir r^rr-' pr-fC-4 ‘iS or io. IeJ-.i.o^ (jj . • •/O H.S, REQUl i;43ii SUBMITTALS 1. 0 j. All of th> fnllo~i.'« infarmarion miKt b« submiHed bv the appUcation toijliat date iq or ja Tor your apolif^rion tn bg con ^dercd coigplttC;. Completed Application Form ~J Ccnified Propenv Owners List of owners within ISO', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, . Govt Center, 348-3271). j • i j u a • Certificate of Surv'ey (signed by a licensed surveyor and include hardcover ----calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/2 x 11 for 4 - TopoS^Sdc sur^'ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes m existing grade ■ — are propped. In addition, provide one (1) copy x ^^ „ 5 Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy %h x 11 ). 6 List of ±e legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an mterest in e oropertv. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 7. As mi addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. 8. ^ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicam aud Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember ttat your annliroHnn is not coi"r'“*“ " O'- information has not been includeth ^e**apptont provide all information requited or requested by the Zomng Tdm S 0 agrees m pav additional fees (smff time not covered by original fee payment) "c3Ut e,tpens«- incutxed its review of this appHcatton and certifies that the information supplied is true a^^orr^t to best of his/her knowledge. /a Applicant’s Signatut^Date /a2 - y- The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to tfcs application and further authorizes rea^o^b^ ^trv onto tl:e property by City.staff,consultants, agents. Commission memoers. arad Coun . members for purposes of instigation and verification of this request. 0%vner’s Signatu^Date 9-^ Applicant must have all^b'JSnais into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Meetin- Plannins Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday or each mon ^ aU hcmis must be present at all scheduled ronew mettings of the Planning Comm^on Md Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please m3k<i of to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildmg & Zonmg 0 this change prior to the meeting. . . S 0 0T0 }S(5) Ml r»jii <f lOt I (2) r^'-X / V' 'i4n>;'<^ ------------J. .v*»'^‘^X /V \ ,'t ^✓v’ SKin i’.'*£ \ x 10 i^i-yo <’ ^------ j X wo; \ "'di» y / xiX-/r> s / 1?L fci r B ii (19) ••X I3,s ^ 1 —X'v OS)?/? iiip , 71 ^ ................... r'(17) w -i X -r. IA K / •■■ ■•• J\ .-X ICJ ^"1o ^ K>i0.•.**. \ •1 t! (f^ROtii'I'J 0,/\yj ' 'M? •7 i— •f?-M ni Ci'f lot 17 t>tH '••■.‘’C Cullft *'7£S•cc;-.:i"J!) Ha’>5 n*i p:io) 02-;i7-Z3'43 \iP I•• • «»•» 45 0004MHN> MNWVtTtiOOOM ADDRESS IMASSIGNEDy^ I»#«R MAm ^i: LOUISE H Lc MRV ;’5'lTA>a»AYER "‘■^MORHiST UM Ml r -»i - _____— SS 0007 ■)3 •'! Slip addr ^'K' oibDO fIrndale rd h ------1 BOSTON ha 0EU6 • I'iiiNAME/AOOR ,V S40 « »i*r «M 'ii''>5fe SJ- MEHHEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMIERS LIST50 02-117-25 45 000500050 ADDRESS UtJASSIGNEOHENRY H SKARPIIETWY H SKARP1045 H FERTTbALE RD ' HAYZATA Ml 55541 50 02-117-25 45 0021 01045 FERNOALE rd H 0 S BALL A E A BALL B SCOTT BALL 1045 FERNOALE RD H HAYZATA Ml 55l91 _____ • ■ ; n>: >.iREPORT NO. PI455401 •. I, • .PACE 10 :.\|i.OMCR NAME •i ;«!;V;TA>0»AYER • ’i )■;: Ei» NAHE/AOOR . 10»S H 1 '-'Vl'fl . •. • NAY^TA ^ i I* r •.** . .*1. • « »“ I.. *v.:‘ • • :14S p'V;M flf ■' T: l.«rL. • . r s i . 117-25 45 0025 FERNOALE RD H B A'K fox ’ B C 4 KATHERINE M FOX 1095 H FERNOALE RD Ml 55591 .*1 < • . I . •. > J. ' PM > ■/viTi %i.l ■ ' I' . • t ••'•hi;..!; • • V, ' ••.' .*• ■ !• 4 i ' » 50 02-117-25 45 000600050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEOLOUISE M LOHRYNORHEST BAMC IWTRUST REAL ESTATE6TH A MARqUETTE MPLS MtT 55479-0044 50 02-117-25 45 0022 01055 FERNOALE RD H GERALD T MCCOURTNEY ET AL GERALD T MCCOURTNEY 1055 H FERNbALE ROAD HAYZATA Ml 55591 TOTAL BATCH 503 00007 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TR« 5ePrJsENTATI0M of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE IIEMIEPIN fcoUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXJITlONi TO THE BEST OF MY KHOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. , , ^ '' C/tU^DATE .■ '..y ^ ; v- •: •‘ u-'.. I «■I X: • VM'f . • fr'H -*i r i.’ • Y tit n \*» \ - •' ! I . » .*. .. , !-|r P** ‘•i-.'V1 .• •» •• '•'■J » c .f'"S *• I f«-,v* i > I • . *■% . f. 7* V ■ ; vi'" ____■ •• s»..'‘‘ ■m- i . ■ • ».Y .*• . \ V I i A • • 1 . • I : j * .* • * »• / *,< ! M':','. H.I,' i:';, ■ i'\ f * ' • >1 ••* • ■ • ' *‘<V ^ . A Mv.; ■ 'Y-- s' , •• \ !t \ !. ti. If.* V » I • * ' ’ , H !*• B* T*l • 'i r. -.-’ SkjfVSy For Scott ti ll««ner Ball 106S Mast r«rndala Road Orono, NH Phonos 473-1450 Book 347 Page 4i File Total Lot Area: 38,238.5 sq.ft.;f Hard Cover Areas M House 3042 sq.ft Cone.WalV 240 M M Court 2398 M N Drive 1800 m W Drive & Turn A. 5850 m N 13,294 M N Scalos l*-30* Denotes Iron Non. Found { •“mJ n • tj V . •' V. tittl an-ai (^•4* *tm ‘••It I »/r • r r 4 V'--is S.--^l t!I v"'-^ — «M Mil ^ I I»It » I I • I I M: 111 Wm iiiwi11^ iDiiSlii jgi lllllijl!!!siiiil i siiiiD Sv.i.'-.'V:'I I11II11 iiiifflpi luiiiij iiilii ;/" ■ ■ ■■TiTiSas;*!vvv!>; ; ifillii j ■•;-■•'•> <-x* •’" EEnurxLmiiDu i/«' • I r HM ■» • ••«« ^uM«.« W .VM »M mm M o^a •(•»• *««•«.• • mimmm a-i a«a4 <\-4 ^ *•*»• M •••- «ixrra'Utr.C.-.r/i.-^t- • •M M *« w** U U»« Ml* MM toail • M Ml MiNNKTONKA DkSIGN, INC. «• # MIX. SI. IwiM IM CH«tiAxM«n. «« tiSif Til ttitj ,Mf|J fil'iJirl ICOfT 4 ttt»<t0H %mai «Mi«u loe^ • nMNCfcAiifsrt,"- STICKNKY Jc SCHWARZ r:3 (”!Z~) ICMJS_______ • ••« ■ M M Ml I • I I'V; Or O. J MCI ft V ••iuKm ktm .. *t. TDqr flaw ■% f: ■■ 1I • ',4 ) *1 »jt-;;;••. a r <? % <P REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ % % S’ 'ii DATE: February ITEM NO.: {; np 199^ Department Approval: Name Jcar ne A. Mabusth Title Bti iding & Zoning Administrator Administrator Revies^cd:Agenda Section: Zoning: Item Description: #2106 William and Laura Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Variance Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB Brief Review of Application ITie applicants seek approval of a side setback variance to allow reconstruction of a section of exterior wall of a guest house that was partially dcstroNcd in a tire on November 29, 1995. The applicants had received approval of a conditional use pemiit tor a guest house use in 1994. The 1994 review did not consider setback variances as alt work was done within the existing building envelope and no structural improvements were proposed alor^. the west side lot line. Before applicants can rebuild the section of the west wall located 3.1 from the side lot line, applicants were asked to tile tor a side setback variance. Planning Commissi«*n Recommendation The four member Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the side setback variance as proposed. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCII. ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. Isv A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2106 WHEREAS, William J. Stoddard and Laura C. Stoddard (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2605 Kelly Avenue within tlie City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as tollows: Lot 5, Block 5, including adjoining vacated 34 feet of Kelly Avenue, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the rebuilding of an exterior wall of a guest house located 3.1' from the west side lot line where a 10’ setback is required. Minnesota: J. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2106. Ihe property is located in the LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists ot 1.68 acres. llie Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 20, 1996 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. Major landscaping improvements were completed at the time ot the renovation of the guest house and to relocate structure to the east iu order to meet the 10' side setback would result in the loss of several new plantings and retaining walls. B. The movement of the structure to the east will result in the loss of several mature trees and plantings. Pace 1 of 4 c.The structure has existed in its current location for over 35 Nears. D. Steep slopes to the east and the south of the guest house structure provide additional obstacles or restrictions if new construction were to meet 10’ side setback. 4. E. The foundation is in excellent shape and was not damaged by the fire. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propert>’ are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other propierty in this zoning district: that granting the variances would not adversely atfect tratfic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the eommunitv. CONCLtSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings and hardships, the Orono CitN' Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the reconstruction of a section of exterior wall and grants a 6.9’ or 69% side setback variance, subject to the following conditions- 1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building pennit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 26, 1997). Pace 2 of 4 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be pumsliable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants hcve read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothv M. Hallin, Citv Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of February, 1996 by Edwurd i. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Paae 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 __, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this dav of , 199___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared know n to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instruiuent, .»nd acknowledsied that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Ihiblic Page 4 of 4 TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE;February’ 9,1996 SUBJECT: #2106 William and Laura Stoddard, 2605 Kelly Avenue - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District: LR*1B Application: Applicants seek approval of a side setback variance to allow the reconstruction of a portion of an exterior wall of a guest house partially destroyed in a fire on November 29, 1995. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B) - Side setback variance. Required = 10’ Existing = 3.1' Variance = 6.9' or 69% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Addendum E - Hardship Statement F - Neighbor’s Acknowledgment Forms G - Floor Plan II - Approval Letter. 2585 Kelly Ave. 1 - Travelers Insurance Letter 1/23 96 J - Applicants' Request to be Placed on Council Agenda of2/26'96 K • Photo of Original Structure L - Photo of Renovated Guest House M - Resolution #3455. .Application #1942- 8/8/94 N - Survey Description of Request Applicant received approval of a conditional use permit for the guest house use that included an area variance. Tlte property is 1.68 acres in area and the code would require 1 acre tor a principal structure and an acre for the guest house. The original structure was two stories with a lower level Zoning File #2106 February 10,1996 Page 2 garage and an upper sto.y that contained living areas. The structure did not contain a kitchen or a ba*h and could not function as an independent unit. Prior to the reconstruction that included a bath and kitchen, applicant was required to file the conditional use permit for a guest house use. The review did not consider setback variances as all work was done within the existing building envelope and no structural improvements were proposed along the west side lot line. Unfortunately, the applicant was advised that before he could rebuild the west wall of the structure located 3.T from the west side lot line that he would have to obtain a side setback variance. This has created major delays for applicant who wishes to proceed as quick as possible with the restoration. Review Exhibit J, applicant has asked to be placed on tlie ne.xt agenda of the Council. Review E.xhibits D and G, as applicant advises there is no plan to expand on the building envelope but merely to replace the wall at the west side lot line and to replace interior walls damaged by smoke. Hard.ship Statement Review E.xhibit E, h;irdships are as follows: 1. Major landscaping improvements ' completed at the time of the renovation ot the structure to relocate structure to UiC east would result in the loss ot plantings and retaining walls. 2. The movement of the structure to the east w ill result in the loss of mature trees and plantings. 3. The structure has existed in its current location for over thirty-five years. 4.Steep slopes to the east and south present additional limitations for new construction that would meet 10 ’ side setback. 5. The foundation is in excellent shape and was not damaged by the fire. Options of Action To either approve or deny the application as proposed. ch CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initia! Application Fee $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-confoiming structures After-the-Fact Fees (Double application Application # _____Date Received ^ Amount Paid ^ ic. /’■€^A- »\ :V PROPERTY INFORMATION / . SiteAddress 0^ (■7L?') n ^ /6 A £^V)Ua1 Gout Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) •• ll'/^ 23ly 0O2‘P. Attach legal description to appHcation if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _____nP(l\L /9^.?_______________ ____ I (do)(^do not^ also own tl^ adjacent parcels of land. efty: Y_ _(month/year) Present use of propej Zoning District; residential other (specify) NT p i T Phone (home ) ^'7!' , IJ/LUA/^ ^ \O0p/^P0 APPLICANT Name Address: 0{ioT l{<^ LL'i /f(/f OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_______( ________ _____ Phone (work ) l^lLL'2) Cirv: dllurjQ _________Zip: S'S'Js! Phone (home)_________________ _____ Phone (work)__________________ Address;Cit\':Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estim^d Construction Cost Inscribe request in detail: lU/PA/A Td (oOf iT /iP04f /A Y M'kJ 1 4 r/i/GTdruT A//)iJfrV/7>T /L i"—,r , z' £ ~rr /\ - . (attach additional sheets if necessarv) VARIANCES REQUIRED ^ f/o/Uu'f. V REQUI Lot Area Setback: Hardcover___Lot Width __ Front Side ____Lot Coverage __Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSIIIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTV CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficult or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with^Zoning Code requirements: /y ^ 71^ ______ iSrTt^ •'hL:oL/ii/^ ik u (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. A hm REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All «f th. follAwin. infonnati.'n -...t h. «ubmiKfd by tht HBPlitatiOB 4ta<llint 4a ttJii ord6r for vour application to be cons idered compl^tSj. l/* Completed Application Form , , / 1/ Certified Propertv Owners List of owners within 150', labels and nlat map (yon .mist obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Govt Center, 348-j271). Certificate of Sur\ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy V/z" x 11" for reproduction. Topoeraphic sur^•ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any char.ges in exisung grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 'A" x 11" tor reproducuon. Sketches or plans ot floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11 ). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. Tliis would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current o\vner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified ot this application. „ Additional items as may b requested by City staff. ine APpncani anu .......—n . i i i viirinnce anpHcntion is not comnicte if the abo ve, information has not been included ^ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . u v • The applicant herebv agrees to provide all infonnation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that information supplied is true t^d correct to the besl^ofhis/^r knowledge. Applicant's Signature // j^/ ^------^ ^ 0'*'N'ER'S SIGN.ATURE ‘ '1 ne owner herebv acknowledces and agrees to this application and further authonzes ret^onabie ^ntr>' onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of h/vestigaiion and verification of iin.> request. Ownt Signature Date moZ Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, p ease make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning OfTice of this change prior to the meeting. iUN DATE 01/11/HC' ! ' tATCH SMU%;k' fW AOOR ' ONNER NANI TAXRAvm • NMC/ADM- ■' i'i . '■r \ . \ c 1.'^’ ♦ / ' ' ; i : MOR AOPR !. OMCR NAHE , ; i", • TAXRAYER tttlC/AODR ■/v • - ■: v; IJ' PROP ADDR ~ OMNER NAME i:» i!. TAXPAYER NAME/AODR .r- '^1 Si tO-117-tS 11 0007 07S40 lUELLY AVC ICXMC K KELSON ICXW( K NELSON E540 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR NN 55SSI Si E0-117-2S li 0019 02545 KELLY AVE EVERETT J SCHROEOER E J SCHROEOER 2545 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 Si 20-117-23 14 0022 02405 KELLY AVE N J STODDARD I L C STODDARD HILLXAH J 4 LAURA C STODDARD 2405 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 iraiNEPIN COUNTY PRWERTY XNFORHATIQN SYSTEH PROPERTY OtCRS LISTSi 20-117-2S 11 OOSO 02525 SHADYHQOD RO DEANNA H LEACH CLAIR ROOD 2215 KENNOOO NAY NAYZATA m 55391 REPORT NO. PI4S54Q1 PAGE 20 •M \f ■•V#; 1 . * i •• 1 ' 6 * rt • * B (r , 1 • I't. i * *■) 0 1 % •• % ,• • •. I. • ?»’•• * 5.! J - ♦ r * ;* * • 1 •y • • r v) " . - •* •. • f 'V ; fc,' / • * J \ * *• I . . • '' • V - -V- - • I se 20-117-ZS 14 0020 02565 KELLY AVE ALEOA C BURCH ALEOA C BURCH 2565 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55S31 38 20-117-23 14 0024 02625 KELLY AVE KURT NEJEZCHLEBA ET AL KURT A CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBA 2625 KELLY AV EXCELSIOR m 55331 3B 20-117-25 14 0016 02620 KELLY AVE GINGER L PRITCHARD GirttER L StOTT 2620 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 553$1 56 20-117-23 14 0021 02567 KELLY AVE LEONORA R MITCHELL Mrs 0 F MITCHELL 2567 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 tOTAL BATCH SOB 00006 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE, REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEAR^ THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HE»MEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION« TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. DATE ^bY • i * ' *if;- i--;. f't '• i- • f^v'- • r • * • I - •* ' t [ - ‘ -rV .'V" • ’*'/ • •' • V V • • • • V- fn-i: ■ ric..)''ivvii F-.O r ■ ■- i WillumJ. Stoddard January 9,1996 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Department City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 .t JJ ?• . % - * Subject:Request to repair sections of Guest House recently damaged by fire at 2605 Kelly Avenue Dear Jeanne: Per our recent meeting we understand an updated variance is required prior to granting us permission, to repair our guest house damaged by a fire started by a new refrigerator November 29, 1995. Enclosed with this letter, please find our variance application, hardship statement, and a recent photo (complete with in-laws) of the structure. Please let us know prior to the planning commission meeting if more information is required. In summary, we would like to repair it as it was prior to the fire with no modifications anticipated. The majority of the structure is fine, although smoke damage will require all new interior siding (exterior is fine on about 80% of the building), and the foundation appears to be in fine shape on the portion most heavily affected by the fire. m We were very appreciative of Orono granting us the variance, CUP and building permits last year for the improvements. The guest house was a wonderful place for my family, friends and neighbors to utilize. It was the focal point of our summer outdoor activities and parties. Almost too good to be true. Please grant us the updated permit to repair it. We would be most appreciative for it. We look forward to discussing this further with you. Sincerely, Will»(irn & Laura Stoddard 2(>05 Kelly .Avenue Orono. .MinnotJia 55331 Telephone: (612) 47 1-.S0S8 Fa.x: (612) 471-0888 January 9,1996 // : i9 J •1 f4m • ri,^- Subject:Hardship Statement to repair sections of Guest House recently damaged by fire at 2605 Kelly Avenue We were granted a variance and conditional use permit (CUP) about I 1/2 years ago for updating our guest house and subsequently spent tens of thousands of dollars on the structure and over one hundred thousand dollars on landscaping the adjoining structure with shrubs, trees, boulder walls, a pond with three waterfalls and a bridge. To now be required to re-locate the structure approximately six feet further west to conform to the 10 foot side setback code would be in contrast to your recent approval and cost us well over two hundred fifty thousand dollars. In addition, the guest house has been in the same location for over thirty-five years, and the east and portions of the south side slope significantly. Mature trees also cover the property whereby total guest house relocation would certainly cause damage to. 9 • 0 We would like to repair it as it was prior to the fire with no modifications anticipated. The majority of the structure is fine, although smoke damage will require all new interior siding (exterior is fine on about 80% of the building), and the foundation appears to be in finq shape on the portion most heavily affected by the fire. William & Laura Stoddard ; 7 "* f/I' j « ■f: I (we) Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form LrohioA/f % 1^(TCOTiw Zf97 K‘uc'< Avc [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. if. 'iLy / ^! Of Ip roperty Owner DateJ DateProperty Owner ♦♦********«i*****************+************************************************* I (we) print name(s)]print address have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at (^U)' also referred to as Land Use Application No. ________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the impi ‘ .........'»’'* nrono.ed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Jr//c /» Property 0\vner Property Owner idl HoLiorrii. I'a; If you have any information that may [,'s^TTI lO, nts tc , ‘ ' d Use! Application, please submit your comments tc . _ ' ^ _ I'-'U, •) days prior to the scheduled meeting date. lyi Ju/lfj ^ Ji ^^7 ^i6> fAiurs xo I f \jr-- « . v' 7/ -• * V "'i- ._■> H To whom it nay concern: We would like to encourage the Orono City Council to approve Bill Stoddard-s request to rebuild the guest house on his property at 2605 Kelly Avenue. Bill and his new wife, Laura, have done a remarkable job of upgrading and improving their "buildings and grounds" since moving in about three years ago. After they completed their-remodeling of the old guest house last year, they graciously agreed to our request to "borrow" their house for three nights. Our daughter was getting married in late Octooer and her fiance's parents were coming from Marblehead, Massachusetts. Ou • house was full, the out-of-town wedding party members were staying ft a B & B in Excelsior-and we wished to have Scott's-,parents stay close enough for us to spend extra tine with them. The Stoddard guest house was the answer to our prayers. The lack guest accomodations in our area is a difficult problem. Here was the perfect solution and we were and are very grateful to the Stoddards. Having such generous, friendly people as neighbors has been wonderful. VJe are glad the Stoddards want to rebuild. Having a lovely new guest house in our neighborhood will prove to be advantageous to everyone — especially those of us needing that extra bedroom-every now and then!! Sincerely, 2555 Kelly Avenue Orono %/ • II t w wHaydci slnsurance ^JtttvtitrTGroup^ MMNBVXXJSFTElDOmOE 646S Wiqaaia BnitoMfd P.O.eoxSS MnnMCicl«.MNS5i NT. and Mrs. Wllliaa Stoddard 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono, MN 55305 January 23, 1996 VTA FAX awn MMn. File Ho. Insured: D/L: SKD7045 Stoddard 11/28/95 .A * • • jj- jf t » 0 * -V# Dear Mr. Stoddard: The purpose of this letter is to infora you of results of the Fire Loss Investigation Analy.^iR Report provided to us by Investigative/I>os8 Control Services. As you Xnow, we had investigator Jeffrey L. Hashinger of that firm loss site to atteept to determine the actual cause of the fire •to your carriage house. Mr. Wachinger's conclusions are as follows. Most importantly, Mr. Washinger did determine that fire in your carriage house was of an accidental nature. His report indicates that the fire originated along the central portion of the north wall common to the Jcitchen area of tte structure. Mr. Washinger's report goes on to indicate that based on the total destruction of the refrigerator, he considers it a strong indication that the fire was li^ly caused by that refrigerator. Our problem at this point is that there is not enough of tlie refrigerator left to do an accurate analysis to determine the specific problem with it. Mr. Washinger analyzed the burn patterns to support his conclusions regarding tho fire starting in or around the ref rigerator. Due to the almost total and complete destruction of the refrigerator unit, Mr. Washinger was not able to conclude the exact failure mode. He does indicate that the fire flow patcerns emanating away from the refrigerator do lend support to the theory of primary fire occurrence beginning in that area. At this time, we are in discussions with Mr. Washinger as well as Travelers Insurance Company Engineering per?ionnel to determine if there is enough evidence left to do in actual analysis of the remaining refrigerator parts. One Tomn Scu*re Hartford. CT -2- TO: Hr. and Krs. Hilllan Stoddard SR07045 t£e “rrlaga lioaM, including hMting, ventilation, electrical, pluabing, e^c• WMhinger's conclucion that all othar possible causes of the as well as Mr. Tom Huedahl do concur with the fxndings of hr. Washinger. With regards to the scttleeent of your dwelling claim, we do intend to be issuing payment in the v«ry near futtirc. Please call me if you have any questions. sincerely. i^mithGregor claim Adjuster G«S:dgf j* ♦ IMTPL P(iGE.l)03 ♦* <r. William / Stoddard January 9, 1995 Ms. Jeanne Mabuslh 21oning Department City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 553?.3 17 « »• ' * / i Subject;Request to be placed on City Council Agenda to repair sections of Guest House damaged by fire at 2605 Kelly Avenue Dear Jeanne: This is a formal request to be placed on the February 26, 1996 agenda for the Orono City Council for purposes of obtaining an updated variance so that we may be able to repair wall sections on our Guest House recently damaged by fire. V‘i lock forward to confirming this with you. Sincerely, i 2605 Kelly Avenue Orono. Minnesota 55331 Telephone: (612)471-8088 Fax: (612)471-0888 © ■ #ntf rvi \— V /•4 m"•'.r^. 1“^- • . . •*x^..to* V -*to% . — * - ^ ^ 'V., ■# •> T* . ^ .-• »<• 4l - •V. w • f / . ^ • i 1^^:: -iif. ^ *' 'T • h4 / • f ' V\v" -V* La. W ?. 1 ^ \ tw- ^. • 7^ ^ A-'. : ■•■=* ,% -Nr - V V. -y»’ ■*• ^ * •-? V -. • X ./tmz */V- ^*T. -:i:!rs?:»a,^w Ti'. • •• w ,. • r-*^ Overall front view of guesthouse. Interior view of guesthouse. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTIOiN OF THE CITY’ COUNCIL NO. 8 4 5 5 A RESOLUTION GR.\NTING A VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MU'NICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SU’BDIVISION 3 (A) FILE NO. 1942 WHEREAS, William J. Stoddard (hereinafter the "applicant ") is the 6wner of the property located at 2605 Kelly Avenue within the Ciw of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as:/Townsite of Langdon Park Lot 5, Block 5, including adjoining vacated 34’ of Kelly Avenue, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to allow the continued use of a residence strucmre as a guest house on the property and an area variance as property consists of 73,008 s.f. or 1.68 acres where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1942. The rropenv is located in the LR-IB Singie Family Ukeshore District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 73.008 s.f. or 1.68 acre. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 18, 19 an recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variance as proposed, based on the following unique findings and hardships: a There is no immediately adjacent lands available for applicant to in order to meet the area standard for a second residential umt per the LK- IB area standard. TRANSFER ENTERED H£NN£PIN COUf^nr TAXPAvcfl .Se^ViCeS SEP 10 1994 Page 1 of 5 c/~ ^ ^DEPUTY ^ • CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL NO. ^8455 b. 4. c. d. e. f. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A) (1), the lot meets 80% of required lot width at 125’ (required 140’) for development and use as a single family residential unit. Sev.er and water is available to the property and there is adequate capacity to serve the second residential unit. The second residential structure has existed on the property for over 40 years. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent residential properties that would receive the most impact from the intensification in use of the structure. The applicant has advised in writing that the structure shall be used solely for his guests or visiting members of his family and shall never be used for rental purposes. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to otlier property in this zoning district; Utal granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a guest house use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a tire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City stalf, comments by Uie applicants and other parties and the effect of the proposed variance on the healtli. safely and w'elfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF JHE £1X5' COUNCIL NO. _ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit and variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) for the existing guest apartment above the detached garage to be served by sewer and water and grants an area variance of 14,112 s.f. or .32 acres, subject to the following conditions: 1.The City in granting this conditional use permit and area variance to allow the continued use of the second residential structure on the property for guest house use does not purport an inherent right to subdivide this property at a future date. The existing LR-IB zoning district requires a minimum of 2 acres in area and 140 ’ of lot width. Ihe propeny consists of 1.68 acres and measures 125 ’ in width. 2.The residential structure may never be used for rental purposes but shall be for the exclusive use of occupants of principal strucuire, guests or hired help. 3.The applicant is hereby advised that a fire wall separation must be provided between lower level garage and first floor level guest apartment. 4.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 8, 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shal' constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understoocf and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 I . ; CITY of ORONO % RESOLimON OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5^ 4 5 S Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of August, 1994. Property/Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of ^gust. City. CAWXE A. HASEMAN HCTAKT PUBUC-i»«E30TA HENNEP1.M COUNTV WV CCUUSSON tXPIACS (-a-W J Notary Public Page 4 of 5 r*«V09) N«c - ’-'urTT'*^ — ^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CIT\' COUNCIL NO. 3 4 5 g_____ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of \99j£_, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, pemonallvad^eared [|];//.‘/7>k J. ^ > .vnAigrriW------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. j fj.CAROLE A. HASEMAN NOTMir W.W.C M—lt30T> HENNEPIN COUNTY Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _________________________^----------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, an acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 RESOLUTION #8 4 5 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO • i I Dorothy H. Hallin. City Clerk of the City of Orono. Hennepin County Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on Auaust 8 • ^924 • ^Hat the same is a true and“l:orrect copy of said resolution was duly adopte-i by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set 10th , day of August- - -- hand and seal this . 19 94 allin. City Clerk (SEAL) ^ V—t-i-— POPHAM HAIK SCNHOBfMCM * KAUFMAN, LTD. iwcuoomc T»f« P^Acnet ow MASON. riNWICK * LAWNtNCl, ESTAOLISHIO 1961 U S. Or^tCBt: OCMVCK. COCOflAOO Til. SOS-FS9-1IOO MtAWt. FCOAIOA TBU SOS'SSO OOtO WASMiMaroM. o C Tbu 202-S24 SOOO SUITS 3300 222 SOUTH N inth Staskt MiNNtAFOLil. Minnesota 35402*3336 Tel 612*333*4800 • FAX 6 12*334-a866 CARRIC L. BAZCLLA D irect D ial (6I2) SS4-MM ArriLlATtONB: ■ sijiMO. China Tcc 01 I tEt S I 3526 I LX'^IIO. Ct*HANV Tic 01 l4S-34l-46l042t • TurraAAT. oiamanv Tbl OI I46-7I t -22363 August 29, 1995 Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re; Our File Number 3643.047 Dear Dorothy: Enclosed is the original recorded Resolution No. 3455 (File No. 1942) recorded as Document No. 6467024. Should you have any comments or questions, plea.se do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours. LftiUt Carrie L. Bazclla Legal Assistant / CLB/IS Enclosure aug 3 0 357/22092843 8/29/95 1 -r.vs’ •v- V'' V'-' _ ^ '■ .......................... \ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 22. 1 ITEM NO.: Ijy % ^ <p \ \ Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2111 Terrance J. Bieker, 2440 Old Beach Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning District: LR-lB Brief Review of Application Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit that would allow the installation of a permanent dock at the residential propert>\ The t-shaped dock measures 24’ in total length and will be located out of a channel dredged in the mid 70s. The dredged channel is located 30’ from the shore. The DNR will require a permit as structure is not a single linear dock. Review Exhibit L, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will not require a permit review. Applicant has filed the building plan and site plan with the LMCD and they advised staff that they have not completed their review of the dock plan. Greg Nybeck of the LMCD advised that he would contact my office on Monday to let me know if he saw any problem. Based on the information provided by Mr. Nybeck, the dock would meet the required setback from the extended north side lot line. The setback is shown at 21’ and the side loading slip is 20’ in lengtlt. The LMCD would require a minimum 20’ side setback. Construction plans have been amended per the City Engineer’s review comments (review E.xhibits G and 1). The four member Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval ol the conditional use pemiit for Terance J. Bieker and Jeanne-Marie Varga for the residential property located at 2440 Old Beach Road subject to the condition that the building permit cannot be issued by the Orono stall until the City receives written confirmation that the DNR will issue a permit tor the permanent dock and the dock and site plan have been approved by the LMCD. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. '•45^• •l,- t a. \ K A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 9 (B-3) FILE #2111 WHEREAS, Terrance J. Bicker and Jeanne-Marie Varga, husband and wile, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2440 Old Beach Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 2, Shore Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono lor a conditional use permit to permit the inst.illation of a permanent dock per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 (B-3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2111. 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Lakeshore Residential Zoning Distriet requiring 1 acre in area. J.On February 20. 1996. the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval of a conditional use permit based on the following findings: A) Total dock length will be 24’ and will not encroach upon the dredged channel located 30' from the shoreline of the property. Pace 1 of4 B) The dock will meet all required setbacks of the LMCD code. C) The City Engineer has approved the amended building plans for the proposed permanent dock. D) The permanent dock designed in a t-shape will require a permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). E) The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in a letter of Februaiy 20, 1996 advised that the proposed construction plan and site plan would not require permit review by the Watershed District. 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a permanent dock at a ma.ximum 24’ length will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments ot the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 (B-3) to permit the installation of a permanent dock at the residential property located at 2440 Old Beach Road, subject to the following conditions; 1.Before the City's building staff can issue a permit for the installation of the permanent dock, the applicants or applicants' contractor shall provide written confirmation that DNR will approve the permanent dock as proposed. Page 2 of 4 3. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (February 26, 1997). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ITie foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of February, 1996. by Edward J. Calliian, Jr. and Dorothy M. 1 lallin. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notar>' Public Page 3 of 4 TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mooree, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:February 12,1996 SUBJECT: #2111 Terrance J. Bieker, 2440 Old Beach Road - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Application: Applicant has filed a conditional use permit to allow the construction ot a permanent dock at the residential property. The permanent dock is subject to review and possible permitting by the Department of Natural Resources and Lake Minnetonka Conscr\ ation District. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.55, Subd. 9(B-3) - Permanent docks and other similar structures require a condidonal use permit from the City. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Shoreline of Lafayette Bay - Location of Dredged Channel E - Resolution Approving Dredging and Filling Project for the West Shore Lafayette Bay Association 6/29/78 F - DNR Permit for Dredging Project G - Gustafson Report 2/12/96 H - DNR Report 2/6/96 1 - Building Plan for Dock J - Floor Plan of Dock K - Survey L - MCwb Report 2/20/96 Description of .\pplication Review Exhibits 1, J and K, applicant proposes the installation of a 24’ length permanent dock to be placed 21' from the extended north side lot line and 102’ from the extended south lot line. Applicant also proposes a canopy structure over one of the slips. All canopy structures are to be approved y the LMCD. f.». I ra rl0T - - - -ii Zoning File #2111 Februar>' 12,1996 Page 2 Review Exhibit H, applicant originally submitted a dock plan showing 6 ’ extensions from the main 4 ’ dock. Note the a.nended plan shows all sections retaining a 4' w idth. The amended plans show' the t-section parallel to the shoreline as being permanent. The DNR will still require a permit for the amended dock. Review Exhibit G, Gustafson ’s comments are limited to the structural design of the dock and asks that the following information be provided by applicant: 1. Provide a center support for decking due to the 4' span. 2. Verification of soil conditions to determine if the 10’ into lake bottom is going to be adequate. j.5"x6" stringers to be corrected to 2"x6". A resident of the Old Beach Road neighborhood (West Shore Lafayette Bay Association) advised staff that all docks installed at the nine residential properties that make up the association were not to exceed a 30 ’ length and that it was their understanding that the City was to enforce this requirement. StafY advised the owner that the City does not enforce design standards for residential docks nor did we get into issues involving navigation. Tlie home owners concern was that a 50’ wide channel was dredged in 1978 30' from the shoreline. Residents were not to install docks that would restrict the 50’ wide navigable channel (refer to Exhibit D). Staff advised the home owner to contact the applicant and to advise Bicker of the standards for dock structures infomially agreed to by the nine residents. Mr. Bieker has submitted :in amended plan showing the maximum dock length at 24*. The original plan submitted with the application showed a 38’ length. The nine property owners would be well advised to develop private covenants filed in the chain of title of each of the properties as a means to alert future property owners of these guidelines for dock construction. Staff has enclosed a copy of the resolution approving the dredging and filling project of 1978 (Exhibit E). A major concern of the Citv for that review was the issue of treatment of spoils from dredging that was placed on the Fresh Water Biological Institute propertv' to the west side of Old Beach Road. 'I he cond.tions of the resolution do not suggest an attempt on the part of the City to control dock lengths for the nine property owners nor does the original DNR permit. Exhibit F. Both the DNR and LMCD will require a permit for the permanent dock. It is not clear yet as of this writinc whether the Watershed District will also require a pemiit but Ceil Strauss of the DNR has advised that she feels that Watershed Districts should review applicant ’s dock plans. Zoning File #2111 February 12,1996 Page 3 Staff Recommendation To approve the Citv granting a building permit for the construction of the permanent dock for Terrance J. Bieker and Jeanne-Marie Varga at the residential property located at 2440 Old Beach Road subject to the tollowing conditions: 1 Applicant's construction plans to be amended to show center support for decking and 2 ”x6" stringers to replace 5"x6" shouTt on plans. 2. Applicant to provide verification of soil conditions to determine if the 10 depth is adequate for piers. 3 Before building permit can be issued by the Citv' of Orono for the construction of the permanent dock the following must be submitted to the City: A. Written confimiation from LMCD of approval of dock location and construction plan. B. DNR permit. C.Permit from the MCWD if required or if not written confirmation that Watershed District does not require a review. (■} J ^ ;t » ^ i i. \ • It. 1 Application #^»LDate Received Amount Paid >/'75 & CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION „ ^ ^ Site Address S*i^Q --------- — T>pe of Appu^nt^nn fn tv. FilpH Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICANT______ Name / • '^ ■ Q _____ Address 0(J Af* -A City Phone (Tiome) 3Ct^ 30ffJ Phone (work) J4»g • /JoO Zin ^'S 3*>i OWNER (if different than applicant) Name________________________ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address Cirv Date Property Acquired ______ Zip. Property i tX^o _(month/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - ( ic,a^ '• S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application X~ $175.00 Residential Accessory Use ;j7-4A/A/i.-/^4<*v $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ” $200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercialylndustrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or lloodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore ______P RD/P ID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no c ange from original application) ~ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , , ^ $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant tees) $300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_______________ Present Use of Property P< Residential Other (specify). REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Describe request in detail. 3 Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Sur\-ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for surv'ey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic surv'ey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 7. List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current o\vner(s). 8 Construction plan, if applicable (see staft tor requirements). 4. 5. 6. 9. A'Z/t As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified ot this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" .X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Statf;____________________________Date^------------------------------------ APPLIC.4NT S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original tee payment) and/or unusual e.xpenses incurred in review ot this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council .members for proses of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature______------------------------------------------- Date---------------------------- Applicant must have all subminals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authonzed agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ -V- • ■ a \ U9 M *f Jk (?l'lc» [7W ^9t * ff. (18) 2-* -•» sii*:s 3 *1 f* *r\ 5 - V- ✓ cun.cT 3 (30) 12’) / =\t ‘■•- «<• >- 4 i r <«4 »’ —\ • • ’ ;? 5« ) UFAVSTTi \ t ' -, i (25) ----- r»o C3) -w I (29) !'l i(ir ii>;s ' ;(13) X v>|•: ;/ .3 >0 ^ •» . 7 •* g..---(..-—Q- .y-, 0/^ V o r / ^7 / / cfi 3^4 ».*» I / /. 7. y :» lOt J »». - / (S) —y>«7<\ / . \J^'-^' ^ V ••» V •• MM MTIfOl/M/ . • •#.',■ * M * ' 4 A! r >v I # f* 'i'«3'‘tr . I ^ ' ■ • »••M .11-117-2S tZ 0002 . < J: AOOft : 024lt old MACH RO O £ • »*«i NMi \*t N 0 • MWMA4M i. St 'fTA»AYI« ' ,. NALTU A A OeTTY T WNtUNN * <i it MNi/AOOR OLO REACH ROAD . ; ' . : V f NAYZATA M4 SSSn - ^ ^ ^ ^ ■' * 'L** * * I * ■•■iC'' 'i>• ■ ^.vl'U 0.5 , -jt ■ IR' 21-117-25 22 OOOS U,? :;RROR AOOR : 02490 olO REACH RO ONNER NAHE R R A 0 L LIEFSCHULTZ o:'l TAXPAYER _ RtEVEN A OEANN LIEFSCHULTZ NAME/AODR . 2490 OLO REACH RO •x'NAYZATA MN 5S591f• 5 •■"i • I • V 50'; 21-117-25 22 0010 ; ;i.; PROP AOOR ' A'f 02S(UI old reach RO « '.0*«R HAHE I K R RHERHAN « J D SHERMAN •, .TAXPAYER ■; KlRR'O/JACqUELlNE 0 SHERMAN : name/AOOR •' 250R OLO BEACH RO i'.i ! . .' HAYZATA »t4 S5591 1 '^Vv• NENHEPIN COUITY property information SYSTEM PROPERTY ONCRS LIST 50 21-117-25 22 0005 02440 OLD BEACH RO T J BIEKER A J H VAR6A T J BIEKER A J H VAR6A 2440 OLD BEACH RO NAYZATA m BS591 50 21-117-25 22 0014 02425 OLO BEACH RO E H BLANCH CO LTD PTNSHP E N BLANCH CO LTD PTNSHP 5500 H BOTH ST MPLS StI 55451 50 21-117-25 22 0019 02555 OLD BEACH RO T M I A A COOUTE THOMAS M A ALICIA A COOUTE 2555 OLO BEACH RO HAYZATA W4 55591 .•*82 • ;,PROP IaOOR . 02S14*''oLd”eACH*’ro® m0*04ER name d a truoell a C a truoell ^ :• j: taxpayer davio a truoell ; NAME/AOOR 2514 OLD BEACH RO ' HAYZATA m 55591 V * *V-.; w)|!K ’ N.S* ^*0 ; f * • * 0* i:* ’.M J X. f total batch 501 00010 report no. PI455401 PAGE 1 50 21-117-25 22 0004 02400 OLD BEACH RO M M A K A MOOARES MICHAEL H A KATHY A MOOARES 2400 OLD BEACH RO NAYZATA HN 55591 50 21-117-25 22 0017 02455 OLD BEACH RO L LUN9QU1ST A 0 LUNOGUIST LARRY A DONNA MAE LUNDGUIST 2455 OLD BEACH RD HAYZATA MM 55591 02 14-117-25 55 0024 02515 OLD BEACH RO R M ADAMS A K B ADAMS RICHARD M A KATHLEEN B ADAMS 2515 OLO BEACH RO NAYZATA MN 55591 V v1 r ->0 ■ • • ir' • •,'! % * \> 9 H r!,X \l, ■ *• t • A 4': \ •»« ) ..-.•‘••I.-}'**. ^4) i • I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS DATE •** .rif '«■ vj- •• ' * • • *• A • • i N * •'.• Ja. '‘ '• .r'-^ ! * « 1 * ■f ■•s' if,. •• 5 ”o X! r; / • Jf 'x--r tlii -t -'••'‘'^T V * '• rT o'^5i....... »/ •.•«.„• ''^r' -.L"' .X..W--^ ' **• "t vW*- f^So •tv %• Sg^Uc. f- 1&_ ______ .• •.- :>;• > ..y^%V.;.;-,y :<•'* ^' - • • > *' *,v^t .*w; " .- '-v^— .%• .•i - . V’ '*•. •*.•. *. \. r*jfc A."* •*• ^ V — ‘ - *;-iW iN -.t '/ .'Tit- ' y -./yf ; '«'^»'v t t.. ■ V'r ^ •• ' r. r.'* • # 1 • • • Pk* • t •': . - • '> -X n *'*- . • *z V % ,% » 3 ■^e'V 4/4 <r 5:r > /. /. •- ». »%o> # , • ' J ''■w r .* . *■• W>?>. 'C.'t -y G-.r-' y--,ir-o. x; V fir* -- V * ?^o V.. 1?? '--^-.•53'^ •X-' >•''N/ - . ^«< <* • -'• \S t * «*./s* - *■: — * • -!*- ^ -. r .•i t * 5T.' i« \ * * •* V ? i> .y ,y, « » / 1 - te •i” —. f’*» >SS5<r , a9/\~V.--'-g^ ^ ^ _ •• ^ ^ •^* j 4 ** ' -- ., -I •% i , ^\-- :~.- w > -18 * »*x •.*‘*>'* f'* • » n.,* * .' 1 s\ R- ►*-. • *.1 1 - '■>.Vt ■’’-s.-' -• ' * - ••. . .*;* v /•y • ■' »> ^ k ** *t.*ic* ^ ♦♦ -J >-r:-Tr- ' N^ -^i’: '1' =;\Sy* 7s*iqir><c^\^^ •1 •. •1 ,1 *< "V * # t ■■ > i ■"I* ■ ■« i I VI • ',1 * -« *..4 •IL N r • • U ■■H • »•> • •• -• 1.^1* .*v1 i : ■ • 4 4» •** *>. vii^ M ?:i« ♦ f '1, “ • fc* s * RESOLUnOM NO. 9/^ k RZSOLUnOR APFROVINC CERTAIN DREDGINC AND SPOILS DISPOSAL FOR THE WEST SHORE LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, tb« City of Orono is a immieipsl eorporstlon ergsalesd and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council is concerned about the probleas created by unregulated dredging in and adjacent to Minnetonka, which probleas affect the Lake and all the property adjacent thereto* and * W^REAS, the City Council is concerned that peminent structxires and artificial obstructions located in wetlands, lakes, drainageways, and on property adjacent thereto aay adversely affect the natural resotnrees, open space, drainage patterns and wildlife habitat of the City; and WHEREAS, because of the above noted concerns and for the protection of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Orono, the City Council has established and adopted regulations providing for strict control of dredging in and adjacent to the lake and strict control of filling or alteration of wetlands, narshes,. drainageways and land adjacent thereto; and WHEREAS, the Planning Coomission and City Council have reviewed at length an application by the West Shore Lafayette Bay Association for certain maintenance dredging of a channel in Lafayette Bay, Lake Minnetonka, and for placement of dredged materials upon land occupied by the Fresh Water Biological Institute. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The chanzxel dredging is located in Lafayette Bay, Lake Minnetonka, as shown on Exhibit A attached. 2. The channel dredging is required to maint'*in riparian access to nine residential properties within the City of Orono. 3. The channel to be maintained was previously dredged under proper state permits. 5^. fvV . ,-■ f>’'i •‘ ’» .’V .^Meltttloa Bo. 2 'I’v '% The dredging will only remove silt from within the exletlng ebanoel end will not affect the hard lake bottom. the dredging will be done according to the condltlona of the MNCNR permit No. 78-6325 attached hereto as Exhibit B. the dredge spoils will be deposited on property owned by the Fresh Water Biological Research Foundacicn as shown on Exhibit C attached. the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District has detenslned that the disposal site is dry land and not wetland or marsh land. Ihe spoils disposal will be a settling basin behind earthen dikes as noted on Exhibit D attached and as regulated by MPCA state disposal system permit (application attached as Exhibit E). the effluent from the disposal area will be contained within the large FWBI wetlands and the wetlands water qiiality will be dally monlt ored by FWBI staff as a research experiment as noted on Exhibit F attached. AND, BE IT FURTHERMORE RESOLVED, that based upon the above noted findings of fact, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby grant to the West Shore LaFayette Bay Association a Conditional Use Permit for dredging and spoils disposal subject to the following conditions: , ■! . • Dikh construction shall be subject to a building permit, which permit may be issued by staff upon receipt of permits by the HCWO and MPCA and iipon payment of the building permit fee. Dike Construction shall be subject to the approval of the City engineer prior to the start of any dredging. The culvert under Old Beach Road (between the FVBI marsh and lake Minnetonka) shall be sealed to the satisfaction of the City engineer prior to the start of any dredging. Dredging may not begin until receipt by the City of permits from tht MNDNR and MCWD and until at least 24-hour notice be given to the City inspector. .. 'I f «- .'f, \ ./»\ »' • » ■ f ’ '" f ^•’ • .jf «I \ •" '*v/•- *• «• -V • • *^» y .• v^ fi k •> K^» %r 4 I no* >.■ > %t ^5 • ^**( .> I? - * ^ t <. ?r- 'V'. /; 6. 7, 8, 9. Upon conitnictlon of the dike, a eign shall be erected at the applicant's cost on the disposal site, visible from Old Beach Road and at a location acceptable to the City inspector, which sign shall be as follows: Size: Material: Legend: no less than 3* high by 5* long on posts at least 6' high, wood or metal with white painted surface and red, black or blue letters. West Shore LsFayette Bay Association Fresh Water Biological Institute RESEARCH PRO TECT (Larger letters)' Effects of Dredgl^ & Nutrient Release Penults granted by: Minnesota Dept, of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnehaha Creek Watershed District City of Orono Prior to the start of dredging, the FWBI shall sample the waters .of LaFayette Bay and the FWBI marsh for turbidity and for nutrient levels and shall submit a report of sam#* to the City. During the dredging operation, the FWBI shall dally xwnltor turbidity of LaFayette Bay water and shall submit weekly reports of same to the City. Prior to discharge of marsh water to the lake, the FWBI shall monitor the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and dissolved organic carbon In the FWBI marsh, shall weekly submit reports of same to the City, and shall prohibit discharge of marsh water to LaFayette Bay until concentration levels are eqxial to or lower than LaFayette Bay levels. completion of the dredging and release of the marsh water to LaFayette Bay, the FWBI shall prepare a comprehensive report Incltxdlng conclusions gained from the study and shall sxibmit same to the City, the MNDNR and the MPCA. If, at any time during the dredging operation, the nutrient levels in the marsh water or outlet to LaFayette Bay rise to a point determined by the City to be detrimental to Lake Minnetonka, the City reserves the right to enforce a stop work order prohibiting further dredging activity until the nutrient levels are reduced. -a •3 •*^ iSi) K f fe.- ■ 0 m » 1 i *# ' • \ - % • ' » ; i. -• - • /• ' ‘ ■ J *. k • •* . . ■ ..rrd0 ^ *S ' • ■ . -v: . • •• ( ,'-5,r. ■ • • • • • •. • • . • ' \> • • ' • * * #• ■ . j ••• • % H • -. ■ ^ ■ r : ,• . i 1 ♦ ♦ • I MMMltttion. Bo*•V . : • br* . ^ • • . *-4 • >♦. V ll. rlll^'eosBplotloii'of .tho dredging and release or eeaporatlon of . .. iflipotmdad watartf tiia di jpesal site sh.Il be reeontoured and • landscaped, inelnding raaoval of the dike, sodding, seeding end tree or. shrid> planting, to present erosion and to return the area to a natural state, which landscaping shall be at the applicant's cost and for which the applicant shall post with the Citjr a letter of credit for $3,000.00 to ensure performance. n • « . 12. 'Ihe Vest Shore laFapette Bcf Association and the Fresh Water * Biological Institute shall review this Resolution and agree to the conditions contained herein prior to this permit being .. effective, which agreement shall be indicated by execution of this agreesmnt In the spaces provided. r. t. * • «W »!; 'hh .a -4 •y • • • •c.* . s Earl Sween, Chairman Vest LaFayette Bay Association J. M. Wood, Director Fresh Water Biological Institute This Resolution adopted by tlw City Council of the City of Orono on the day of la .. wzr' William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: 6n, Clerk/Administrator I WATC b> MimCSOTA vw SMOU LATAmrS BAT ASSDCZAnOOl 1T r^Ti— ■ ■ ___ 9^0^^ * »V, Uc. PERMIT It NiNttvoaMnw^ llMll «*w< nirtfm_____ fc-g&iW Old Tlfirh Fniil Vajsatft, MR. 35391 •wi >w b. «,r. tb„ io. In mdST"*^ cb«„il. JOO. nod 200' ' • •# ^AOMRnrocscfUieoM:part of Stik ^^ o#c« 16 Ad part of Hid' c*»•« or wv% , Sec. 21, T.ipR, n.239 forOitpMri Thm 1. t*» Of»« e At aibtf SfCCIAt f eo VISIOMS; CEMERAL PROVISIONS Hisnup^H COUPfTY z z SPECIAL FHOVISIONS De senber 30, 1978 tar««br0» ‘ / f'"‘IPi **Oiaru,ekr MMraandMl 2-12-1596 11:29AM FROM BOr£STFaX) * ASSOC 612 6S6 1311 fe P. 1 xtrdo. AA^rf.k Atsoci^ten. »oc 4 #n Action eau4i OopcfX\in«r^ imc»cy«f Ct:o G Boi^stfoo. PC ftcO«rt VI ^ f • io%#pn C f f MjKvm l. SorvM P-C. IhcfMra L Tyfner, fl. Qicnn IX. P L rnomat i. Mor^s. p^. 9ob^ri 0 fc^unic^t P f M CW'iU CPA* • ScrMOr HOwtrd A Vaunrord. P K K§?Tt» A Odfdon, PC P Pf#ff^rT#>. P| P»</i#rtf W Posiff Pf 0«vidO lOiAota P.C. Pooc^’t C. A.(^ .i^fry A. Pouroon P.L MaHI A Mannon, P4 Miehiwl T PL r»d K Rptd. P C rhorr»ai P Ar«d«'’rcn. A I.A P Po'efvwiiei Pt Cotf^AiO C 8uf <fJ/dz. PI Tnomai A SyUo. P L Predanc J Stenborg. P i itmMf Martfrws P I. MivP.aRf P P3 J. P C. T^o/^p« vV P#f#fton PC Mi CAmI C lynch. P C t PC Jpffy D P?»^ich. PC Sccff J Angx-i^ii p c PpnnRth P AnoerfuA. PI MdTK L Polfj. P.L M»fH A 5«4'. P C. 0#ry W. M^ien. P4. P»ol 1. Cax»»a*%. A I A Obni»l i Cdf rton. PS A Pick Schrrildl. P C. Dale A 6^ov« PI. Philip J PI s’aH D JU^wi.j, *• E Miles B Jensen, P £. L Pn Ilia C#evel. P C. KJweh L Wiemef!. PE G»iy O Kfiitofai. PC SHen t Gpgc P C. I Todd Poirep • ( K9 \n L vppp. PL Oouqtat J P L ShPwn 0 iGwitefxon. PI CeCiltd OUvief. PJL Kent J. wogne^. PL Paul G. Hpupr P E. Jonn P. Cofdcr. PX Don O. Boywm. P.L ^offrov X Chfermorr. PL Jetepn » Ah«in P C. Ice M Venn. P I Cf^jrics A f'IC»,ion Leo Ai. Pewwcisliy Nerian M Otton A^es Sf Ring Jamec » gngoinordt 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene iSS Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects February 12, 1996 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Oiono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 555Z3 Re: Bieker Permanent Dock File No. 139-2111, Dear Jeanne, We ' e reviewed the plan submitted for the Terrance Bieker permanent dock application at 244.. Old Beach Road. Wc have the following comments which are limited to the stn?-. ^rsi design of the dock. 1. V -.ide center support for decking due to the 4’ to 6 ’ span. 2. V’erify soil conditions to determine if the '* JO' into lake bottom " dimension b adequate. 3. The " 5 ’ ,Y 6" stringers " looks like an error, it should probably be 2" x 6". Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & .ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 » 612-636-4600 PHONE NO. 1^ STATf Of W!'D^[iS<S)Tr.^ ^department of natural resources METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 772-7910 Ms February 6, 1995 55106 F ILE NO 6 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE* TERRANCE J. BIEKER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION (CITY #2111), PERMANENT DOCK, LAKE MINNETONKA - LAFAYETTE BAY (27- 133-25), CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Ms. Mabusth: I have reviewed the attachments you forwarded on February 2, 1996 for the Terrance Bieker dock application at 2440 Old Beach Road. The proposed permanent dock configuration do^ require a DNR permit since it is not a single linear structure. However, the proposed 4 foot wide dock that extends 36 feet waterward of the ordinary high water elevation (of 929.4') could be constructed without a DNR permit if the two proposed 6 foot wide sections are not constructed or are seasonal structures. You are also advised that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District may require approval for the proposed permanent dock, as currently configured. I am including a brochure that summarizes what can be done without a DNR permit with the Bieker's copy of this letter. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS c:Terrance Bieker, 2440 Old Beach Road (with enclosure) Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Orono Shoreland File AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER V/ABGA?aigWEB DOCK. ^AAn ni n pfapm rhah OflONO, MN 55391 iC \ S 363-3082 / lX. /-I" . /O' I I ^ V 3 ^ a A m.w|mm. • • w* w ___ “*».« • T *T « — •« « • • • » S • • «» M at •2 • • • •- 2 »k« • WJt w • • — 5 « 2 » • • j ^ <2 ^ St^“S•S5-:h!j :!!5isJ — • •• •• ••*- y •;2a;^r5^; .':ts--Si:'*« • It • 2 •* .^* • • POon V^bag PIO • •FEa-iC-l?«to 101 IT OFEck l.•l^TEPiF€r■ c* ........................ f WATERSHED DISTRICT tl247i0t-32 P.Ol 01 ^ Gray Freshwater Center, Navarre 2500 Shadywood Road. Suite 37 Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Phone: *11/4714)590 Fa*: 612/471-06*2 lOARO or MAIiASCAS: Jdm t Thomas. President. Pamela G. Eur'w Vice Pr«dent Manha S. Hanfid. SecreUry. Ttomai W. laBouaty. Treasurer, Mon-ca Grow; c Woodrow Love; ThOfnjt-MipIt. Jr. February 20, 1996 Mr John Laitemer Dock & Lift Service 27950 Sniithtown Road Excelsior MN 5533 1 Dear Miv Lattemer, Your advice to the Minnehaha Creek'Watershed District (District) concerning installation of a permanent dock on Lake Minnetonka for the Terry Bieker residence, 2440 Old Beach Rd , Orono, has been reviewed for possible permit requirements. Upon review of thi.s dock plan you stale that there will be no shoreline altcraiion, addition of fill in the floodplain or lake bottom dredging. In the absence ot these conditions tor the dock installation, the District requires no permit for this dock installation Thank you for verityinc your plan with the District District Director cA-ic:'cc Ms Jeanne Mabuslh City of Orono Planning Dcpiirtmcnt ^ .AJan Wilcutt, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 7c3>S District Director Eugene R. Slromrnen, Assistant DisUict Director Suzinne M. Weedman TOTAL P.Ol A request for council action % DATE: February 23, 199o{>,. ITEM NO,7 Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assi. Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed: /7 Agenda Section: ZoniDiZ / ^ Item Description: Zoning Code Amendment. Section 10.20. Subd. 3(A): 'Schools’ Conditional Use Permit - Add 'Indoor Ice Arenas' List of Exhibits .A - Proposed Amendment (Staff Recommendation) B - Staff Version of Amendment in Ordinance Format tor Adoption C - Proposed Amendment (Planning Commission Recommendation) O - Current Code Section 10.20 Subd. 3 Purpose of Code .Amendment The City has detenmned that the indoor ice arena use docs not fit into the current list of conditional uses in the R-1 A zone (to which all other districts refer); however, it does make sense that this use be allowed as part of a school campus since a substantial pan ot its use. and the most intense use (hieh school hockey games) relates to the school. Because of the intensity ot the use. stalf wanted to place sufficient controls on the use to ensure against adverse impacts on neighboring residential properties. The method staff chose to accomplish this was to add the ice arena use as an accessop' use to a high school (the high school being the principal use). The standard zoning concept ot an accessory' use relies on that use being accessory to a principal use on the same property. The purpose ot making the ice arena use an accessory use to a high school is so that the ice arena is located somewhat contiguous to the high school which is akeady having .some level of impact on the adjacent residential uses. This language is intended to avoid this type of intense use being placed on a parcel the school owns but that is disconnected from the principal school uses. The Planning Commission recommendation on a vote of 3-1 included several changes to the staff recommendation. A discussion of each of the.se is as follows: I..Accessory- use. The Planning Commission recommended that the ice arena be located on property owned by the .school but not necessarily on the same parcel as the high school. This eliminates the required connection with the principal use which is important to controlling the impact on adjacent residential u.ses. •s Request for Council Action continued Page 2 of 3 February 23, 1996 Zoning Code Amendment _________ Setback. The Planning Commission recommendation provides for 50' setback with a greater setback potentially required at the discretion of the City Council. It is staffs recommendation that the setback should be set at the ma.ximum distance that may be required and allow for a variance to that setback based on the impacts ot the use such as noise, lights and intensity of activity. The current ordinance provides for a 50’ setback for schools; however, the ordinance also provides for a 100' setback for clubs, camps, etc. (see 10.20 Subd. 30. Staff recommends establishing a 100’ setback, leaving Council the ability to grant a variance to the setback distance if they so choose, based on factors such as those noted above. The Planning Commission recommendation includes Council approval of a land lease arrangement between the school and a non-profit organizartion operating the icc arena. Staff recommends the City have the ability to review and comment on a land lea.se arrangement but would stop shon of requiring City approval of the lea.se. Safety/Proximity Issues The relationship between the high school use and the indoor ice arena use involves an expectation of student and public pedestrian traffic between the two facilities on occasion. From a safety standpoint, similar to what the B-2 code requires for marinas, an additional requirement could be added that the indoor ice arena and high school uses shall not be separated by a public roadway, nor shall the parking serving the arena be located across a public road from the arena. This will also have an impact of limiting the potential sites for an arena use. Staff Recommendation Amendment language rellecting the staff recommendation is included in Exhibit A. The staff version has been placed in Ordinance format for adoption if Council so chooses (Exhibit B). The Planning Commission's recommended version is included as Exhibit C. The staff version contains the condition prohibiting separation of the arena and high school uses by a public road as discussed above. Staff recommends adoption of the staff ordinance version. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 February 23, 1996 2^nins Code Amendment_________ Options for Action 1 . Adopt staff version of ordinance as proposed per Exhibit B. 2. Adopt Planning Commission version (direct staff to draft in ordinance format) 3. Add/delete conditions from either version. 4. Table for further consideration. 5. Other. seconded by.to adopt the staff-recommended versionProposed Motion: Moved by ___ of Ordinance No._____, Second Series, amending Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20 Subd 3(A). Vote;___ayes.___nays.1 sauniaium STAFF RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE • A SEC. 10.20. R-IA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd 1 Purpose. The "R-1 A" One Family Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited a<mcultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary se\\er. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential District, no structures or land may be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. C. Municipal buildings. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit; A. Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fitty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R” District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines w here the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet ot playground space per pupil. 1 Uses Accessory To A Hieh School. The following uses which arc accessory to a High School use require a separate conditional use perrmt: a. Indoor Ice Arenas. All such tacilities and structures shall be located on the same tax parcel as the principal Hnih School use to which they are acces.sorv.. No suc_h structures shall be located less th.an 100 feet from anv lot line of an abutting lot in an R Distna All su ch facilities shall be owned and or^erated by the school d istrict, or bv a non-protit organizyLQO 1..S. :.n-an.cme,.t With the school distnct (OPTIONAL: suebjease^a^^ appnnal bv the City Council). Su ch facilities shall not be separatedfio m the principal Hii^h School use bv a public road. ORDINANCE NO.SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20. SUBDIVISION 3(A) THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. MuM'cipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(A) is hereby deleted and the following language siibs.ituted in its place: Subd.3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-1 A” One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abutting u.se is tor open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. ^ ,, 1. Uses Accessory To A High School. The following uses which are accessory to a High School use require a separate conditional use permit: a. Indoor Ice Arenas. All such facilities and structures shall be located on the same tax parcel as the principal Hi>’h School Use to which they arc accessory . No such .structures shall be located less than 100 feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R ' District. .\11 such facilities shall be owned and operated by the school district, or by a non-profit organization under a land lease arrangement with the school district. Such facilities shall not be separated from the principal High School use by a public road. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law . Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 26th day of Febmary'. 1996. by a vote of----ayes and __nays. ATTEST: Dorothy .M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Mayor PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE ^^C SEC. 10.20. R-IA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The "R-1 A” One Family Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low- density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-IA ” One Family Residential Distriwt, no structures or land may be used except tor one or more ot the following uses. A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. C. Municipal buildings. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-1 A" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools w hich teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line ot an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abu.iing use is for open play, and nursery schools '.ding fifty square feet of playground space fKi pupil. 1. Uses Accessory a- Associated With) a Hich School. The following uses which arc accessory to (itssociated with'* .lieh School u.se require a separate conditional use permit: a. Indoor Ice Arenas. All such facilities and structures shall he located on property owned bv the school district. No such structures shall be located within fifty feet of an abutting lot in an "R" District and a greater setback may be required at the discretion of the Citv Council. All such laciiities shall be owned and operated hv the school distr.ct. or bv a non-profit organization under a land lease arrangement with the school district, such lease arranizement subject to review and approval by the Citv Council. SBC. 10.20 R-IA ONB FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. § 10.20 ^ L> imnediate access to highways and publxc sanitary sewer. cnh.1 7 Permitted Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residentia!“Siitrlct!*nfstricture or land shall be used except for one or more of the fo’’owing uses. A. B. C. one family detached dwellings. Public owned parks and playgrounds. Municipal buildings. 1 ronditional Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family ResidentiaTois^ic^ninillcture or land shall be used for tne following uses except by conditional use permit. A qchools. Public schools and parochial or private schools ihich teach a felt^o^any lit provided no building District and'^that a fence be Ilu«“nVul“?s%l"lpllTl'al- and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. structu-es ll!i'rs=luL^°fo"'on%°h":l”a”e sTte^irotiL” nl^ buillilg other than rrllilllce shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camps, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, ^onn■!s clubs, tublic swimming pools serving more than one r . Y* scout camcs, ’/MCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, i mi-ofir ca'r^s clavqrounds and other similar uses. .he prin p l??u«u-e 4'r any^rthe above listed uses shall be 100 fee' or noil any abutting lot in an "R" District, and Structures shall be a minimum of fifty feet from any lot line. ORONO CC 279 (4-1-84) .L.. S 10.20 structures, including ^ exchange stations, booster or lle/ated tanka, lift ““ “^locfted within 50- from any lot lina provided no building shall District. Prior to granting such of an abutting lot in . architectural design of service permit it shall be found the netgSborhood in which it is to be structures is compatible rr^n^ral welfare. Public service located and thus will been approved by the City at structures as defined projects shall not required „se permit but such structures shall be require a conditional ^ standards set forth in this subject to all othe FP ^ , nlans involving design and/or section; will require written notice by the Si^7\rfll af\*lcted“proper” o^^ 14^ days prior to the adoption of the amended plans by the Council. Source: Ordinance 29, 2nd Series Aaopted: 2-23-87 E. Greenhouses. Commercial greenhouses provided lt^\e°d"'m%\"e%fa^rfrtm'liVw'fen"£|ved^ foirt-d"!n\-;egu^°red-y»^d\^r?^^^^^^^^^ general zoning code requirements pertaining structures. Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 F. Recreation Areas. A‘^^n,l''no“^rVrt^ of^the ranoes ski slides, provided the area is fc -ed and p principal use is less than 150 feet from any lot line. Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 G. Guest Houses & Non-rental Guest Apartments. 1) Guest Houses. A separate constructed on an -divided l„t for the sol^^^ occupants of the principal A, A"^/„ular^lot requireme.ntsemcloyees or their non-paying guests. All regular lot req shall be met by the guest house. Source: Ordinance 29, 2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 ORONO CC 280 (4-lr84) S 10.20 2) Non-rental Guest Apartments. An apartment 1 —structure on a lot for the sole use within the residence, including their occupants of civinc quests. There shall be at least domestic |•y”’„ent from within the principalone access door to the apartment^ primary access to the Structure, for such a guest apartment shall address ?hJ‘^^nn«rna*'o£^car'ti-c,*sewage treatment, entryway and interior t.he concerns of parhi..g, sewage utilities metered «p«Ite®ly °fPom “'e principal residence utilities and shall not have a separate street address. Source: Ordinance 29, 2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 H Planned Residential Development. Limited to detached single family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of Section 10.32. I Duplex Credit. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon Jd^?a\e^\‘’cSL\%7iaroY ind^;sL=ra r dtflix i%““de^fired°is "Posidential building. J. Apiaries. K. Antenna Structure. One .ndependent st-uc*ure with antenna or combination of antenna attached thereto, another structure provided the height of the antenna °® ro't Y^%^‘*a*LVt?nc\"^at'‘'!ersV"egua\“t“o=\"h- ^0%!!'hlYg^'h^lf"' ?S4 antenna structure. L. Farms (Croc and stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. M. Animals. The keeping of domestic animals for SS";;Fan?r“f“thl\%%°m“%s^''A'mlnlL^or5ne'°a'crfln“lg^ exc?Llve of one acre for the principal building, must be ^''^tlable for each animal unit, except as hereinafter set forth. A minim^^ of ^wo ac-es of open pasture must be available for ^ . , and one additional Lre must be available for each additional horse. When the horses are kept stabled and_ do not 1 .r for feed purposes, the minimum pasture requirement may be a D at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum pasture shall not include low lying lands unusable °/ig\ons of Any person keeping suc.h animals must comply with the . the City Code.' ORONO CC 280-1 (4-1-84) S 10.20 N Stables and Barns - Private. The use of an accessory buildin, for lr^o%TJ x:tsTbln*fsnVe?-f r/:tb*l nearest advent residence and no closer than 75 feet from the nearest lot line. O. Stables and Barns - Public. The use of accessory buildings or la * ‘ resident. Such must meet the not owned by Yq ^3 subdivision 18. Further, no such line. P. Riding Academy. Any such ^^istruction maintained _ ^ —^ r»onr^ucted bv the owner shell meet the as an accessory us^ «€? m N ard O of this subdivision and no suchrequirements oi. Sections M N a .d O^^f th^ adjacent ^eliienc“o"r fes^thln 7 “s feet from the nearest lot line. Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7~14 “86 ORONO CC 280-2 (4-1-84) A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION V>l ^ X DATE: February 8, 1996 r/ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Tide Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Change Orders ^"Number 1 and 2 For The Brown Road North and Watertown Road Culvert Projects (SAP 152-107-01 and SAP 152-103-01) Background Two projects completed in 1995 were the Nonli Brown Road reconstruction project and the Watenown Road culven replacement project. As these projects were in process, several additional cost items were encountered. These additional cost items are as tollows: A.North Brown Road Project 1. Installation of additional retaininj ’ wall Cost $7,423 2.Additional trees to replace those removed for construction (as part of easement negotiations) $2,355 3. Additional storm sewer to meet MCWD permit requirements $10,416 B.Watertown Road Project 1. Additional storm sewer work $3,852 2. Additional tree replacements outside of right-of-way as part of easement negotiations $13,7% 3. Bituminous overlay and stripping of Watenown Road from Wear Lane to Stubbs Bay Road $44,041.65 Fxpl.mation of Additional Cost Items A. North Brown Road 1. Additional retaining wall. The additional retaining wall was installed to avoid the cost of acquiring an easement and replacing 23 mature conitcrous trees. The $7,423 cost of the retaining wall was substantially less than the cost of acquiring an easement and replacing the trees. The tree rcpiacem.ent itself would have cost a minimum of $4,(X)0, and this would have involved the replacement of mature coniferous trees with trees si.x feet in height. This difference in "quality" of trees would have been made up either by replacing the trees with more mature trees at a cost that could have exceeded $10,000 or by paying tne difference as the cost of the casement. J Request for Council Action Continued Page 2 of 4 February 8, 1996 Change Orders Number 1 and 2 For The Brown Road North and Watertown Road Culvert Projects iSAP 152407-01 and SAP 152-103-01)_____________________ B. 2. Additional Trees. At several locations, the project, particularly the storm sewer portion, required construction beyond the existing right-of-way of North Brown Road. To enable this construction it was necessary to acquire easements. Because the construction beyond the right-of-way required the removal of a significant number ot trees the easement negotiations included the replacement of those trees. Although the additional tree replacements increased the "constmction" costs of the project they enabled the city to obtain necessary easements at a cost significantly less than if the city would have had to use condemnation to acquire the easements. 3. The additional storm sewer work involved the construction of a water quality pond downstream of Dickey Lake. This was a requirement placed on the city by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as part of their pemiit review- process. Watertown Road 1, Additional Stor n Sewer Work. The storm sewer work involved the extension of an existing culvert and additional cable concrete to prevent a future erosion problem. ^ • 3. Additional Trees. In the areas wliere the project construction went beyond the existing right-of-way, easements were needed. In these easement areas, trees were removed to enable the construction. The replacement ot these trees was made a part of the easement acquisition negotiation. The additional tree replacements increased the "construction" costs ot the project. Overlay of Watertown Road to Stubbs Bay Road to Wear Lane. Because the Watertown Road culvert project was an MSA project it was possible to CAtend the project to include an overlay of Watertown Road adjacent to the culvert project. The advantage of this was to enable MSA funds to be used tor the much needed overlay versus using the tiinds in the General Street Maintenance Budeet. The overlay will extend the life of Watertown Road for 5-10 years. 1 have attached additional information from Bonestroo regarding each of the cost overrun items. Requ^ for Council Action Continued Page 3 of 4 Februar}' 8, 1996 Change Orders Number 1 and 2 For The Brown Road North and Watertowr Road Culvert Projects (SAP 152-107-01 and SAP 152-103-01)_____________________ Clarification Concerning Easement Costs A meeting was recently held with Boncstroo statf to obtain clarifications and explanations of the cost overrun items, and to underscore the importance of proper change order tollow- through. The meeting was very productive in providing important claritications. and in identifying measures to prevent cost overruns and ensure proper follow-through on change orders in the future. One of the results of the discussion was a clarification regarding the cost overrun items related to easement negotiations. The cost of easement acquisition is generally not estimated or tracked as part of the project construction costs. In this case, however, the negotiation of easements involved construction-related costs because the project required work beyond the existing right-of-way on heavily treed property. Three of the cost-overrun items relate to easement acquisition, although they are being reflected as construction costs. These are the retaining wall, and tree replacements on both North Brown Road and Watertown Road. Each of these "construction " costs was added to minimize the costs of easement acquisition. The only way to successfully and reasonably negotiate the easement acquisition was to agree to replace the trees that needed to be removed. Although the inclusion of construction-related items such as tree replacement as pan of the easement acquisition negotiation enabled the negotiations to move ahead to completion (vs. requiring condemnation), they did result in construction cost overruns. The total easement costs including the cons'metion work was $54,461. Although this is not a small amount, it does reflect the level of costs required to acquire easements on heavily treed property. preventative Measures The discussion also involved a review of the construction projec t process, from the feasibility report through the project completion; to identify ways to ensure accur. i cost estimates, prevent cost overruns and ensure any additional cost items are forwarded to the Council for authorization prior to incurring the additional costs. The measures identified are as follows; 1.Prior to finalizing plans and specifications, identify all required easements and any construction-related items that will be required as pan of easement acquisition. These construction items can then be included in the plans and specifications and in the project costs. Request for Council Action Continued Page 4 of 4 February 8, 1996 Change Orders Number 1 and 2 For The Brown Road North and Watertown Road _____Culvert Projects (SAP 152-107-01 and SAP 152-103-01)_____________________ *7 Smdl m 4 5 Obtain all required permits, i.e. MCWD, prior to tinalizing plans and specifications. This will ensure the plans and specifications include any items required by the permit, i.e. additional ponding required by the MCWD permit. Develop a construction project schedule that provides sufficient time for each stage of the project from the feasibility report to the plans and specifications, to construction. Provide an estimate of easement costs as part of the total project costs. Bonestroo project staff meet with the Public Works Director, and a Finance staff person and/or the City Administrator, on a weekly basis during the project construction period to identify any known or potential additional cost items. Any potential cost overruns must be authorized by the City Council prior to incurring the costs, unless it is an emergency situation in which a delay would cause additional costs. 6. If easement acquisitions will require additional construction items; advise the Council that some easement costs will include additional construction costs, and request the Council to authorize the additional construction costs tluough a change order. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve CtianEe Orders 1 and 2 to the Brown Road Reconstruction - SAP 152- 107-01 and Watertown Road Culvert - SAP 152-103-01 Projects, in the amounts ot $37,842.00 and $44,041.65 respectively. Isv •... - 1/1 Bonestroo MJm Rosene lonestroo. toscne Anfferflfc and Aisociates. Inc. Is an Affirmartve Acnon/Cquai Opportunity Employtr And6rlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 15, 1996 Otto G. tonottroo. PJt. tooort W tosane. PC * Joseph C Andef ♦»«. P E. Marvin L Sorvaia. PC Richard £. Turrser. P C Gienn R Cook. P C. Thomas E. Noyes. P C RoPert G Schonichi. P E Susan M. CPertin. C.P.A • * Senior Consultant Howard A. Sanford. P C. Keith A. Goroofu P £• RoOen R. Pfeffeiie. P C. Richard W Foster. PE David O Loskota. P E Robert C Russek. A l«A Jerry A Rourdon. PI Mart A. Hanson. P C. Michael T Rautmarsn. PC Ted K Field. P E Thomas R Anderson. AIA. James R. Rosenmertel. P C Dorsaid C Burgardt. P E. Thomas A Syfko. PC. Frederic J StenPorg. PI Ismael Martinea. P C Michael P Rau. P C Thomas W Peterson. PC. Michatl C Lynch. PM. James R. Maiand. PM. Jerry O. Pertxsch; P C. Scots J. Argarset. P f. Ke'^neth P Anderson. P C Mam R Rolfs, P E Mark A Seip. P C Gary W. Morien. P C. Paul J. Gannon. A.1.A Darsiel J Cdgertoa P C. A Rick Scnmidt. P C. Dale A Grove. P C. Philip J Caswell. P E. Mark 0 Wallis, P C. Miles B Jensen. P C. L Phillip Gravel. PC Karen L Wiemen. P C Gary O knstolitf. P E Brian K. Gadt. P J. C. Todd Foster. P C. Keith R Yapp. PM Douglas J Benoit. P C. Shawn O. Gustafson. PX. CeciMo Ottvier, PC. Kent J. Wagner. PI. Paul G Hesier. P CL John P. Gordtr, PM. Dan 0. Boysjm. PM. Jeffrey J. Chleringer. PX. Joseph R. Rhem. PM. Lee M Mann. PX Charles A Erickson Leo M. Paweisky Harlan M. Olson Agnes M Ring James F Cngelhardt Mr. Ronald Moorse, .Administrator City of Grono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: B^o^\•n Road Mcrth SAP 152-107-01 Watertown Road Culvert SAP 152-103-1 File No. 13972 Honorable Mayor and City Council: Enclosed is Change Order No. 1 for the Brown Road North Reconstruction and Watertown Road Culvert Improvement Project. Tliis Change Order results in an increase in the Contract in the amount of $37,842.00, to a revised Contract amount of $604,348.50. Part A of this Change Order provides for additional retaining wall and trees that were necessary to negotiate easement acquisitions. Part B provides for additional storm sewer needed to construct a water quality pond downstream of Dickey’s Lake which was required to obtain a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Part C provides for the extension \n existing culvert and additional cable concrete needed to prevent future erosion. Part C also provides for trees that were necessary to negotiate easement acquisitions. Tliis Change Order results in a j.68 percent increase over the original Contract amount. We anticipate that Parts A and C, and 77.5 percent of Part B will be eligible for State Aid reimbursement. We recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 as submitted. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. //vowv^ — ervi Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. Enel. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636*4600 .'k ’ . *• Bonestroo Rosene AnderNkA Associate] |bi|pwfff ft Owner: Chv of Omiio. P.Q Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 55323 t)a(e Jan. !5. 1996 Comractor BuflaJo Pituminnus. 2852 Couiilv RJ. I2N. Buffalo. MN 55313 Change Order No. I Bond Co. #B 257(KM7 Cobb-Succkcf-Dtinpby & Zimmerman. 150 S 5Ui St. #2000, Mpis, MN 55402 CIIANC;!*: ORDUR NO, I MUNICIPAL STATE AID IMPROVEMENTS nuOWN ROAD RECONSTUCnoN - SAP 152-107-01 \VA I ICR roWN road culvert - SAP 152 :0A-0l File 13972 De5ci iptinii t)f Work lliis riiaii^c Onli i pn)vidc5i for .'uldilioiial Moim sewer, retaining wall aiul trees along Brown Road. Tlicse trees wer** instaited as pari of casemenl negotiation and work cnitsidc of tiic nglU-ol-way. TIic sioiin sewer was rei|uired hy tire WaterslictI District fc^r die outlet of Dickey Lake. 1 he second part of Uiis n»anpe Order provides lor trees, a culvert extension and cable concrete along Watertown l^oad. Tlie trees were installed as pari ol easement negotiations. No. Contrncl UiUI Totol Item Unit Qtiniility Price Amount Hrowii Road Tai l A - Sired - SAP 1.^2-107-01 1 12.604 Modular Idock retaining w;iJI SF 571 13.(K)7,423.00 2.171 .“^Ol Spruce Colonido Blue O' lit B h 13 CA 15 1.17.00 2.355.00 Inial Pail A y.778.(H) Part II - Stniiii Sewer - SAP 152-107.01 2.101..115 18 ” RC pipe apron FA I 475.00 475.(M) .101.602 *tra.sh guard for IS* lU* pipeaprtui FA 1 400.00 400.00 2.103..Ill I2‘* UC pif>c sewer tl'l V) t)fiS 3(M)6 LF 31 23 (M)713.00 2503 .11 1 15" RC pipe sewer (C! V) DBS 3(M)6 LF 92 25.00 2,300.(H) 2.103.51 1 IS" RC pipe sewer (Cl V) DPS 3006 LF 112 3 1 .50 3.528.00 2021 .101 Mnhili/ation l ;LS 3.000,00 3,000.(MJ 'Pnlal Part B 10,416.(8) 3N ’alc*i tfovn Ro:nl Pane-SAP 152-103-01 2.101.515 1 RC nipe apron fa 1 400.(K)4(K).(K) 13972/CO wM r » ' "V « 2503.5 II 1 2" RC pipe sewer tCI V) DE 3006 2571 .501 Spruce Colorado Dlw 6‘ hi D&B 2571.502 A.sh Summit 3' cal BAD SP -1 1 Cabls concrete. CC-35 Total Part C Total Part A Ttual Part B fotal Part C T(*lal Chance Order no. I - ADD LF 100 23.00 2..300.(K) EA 28 157.00 4.396.00 EA 40 235.00 9.400.00 SF 192 6.00 1.152.00 17.648.00 9,778.00 10.416.00 17^8.00 37.842.(K) 13972/co wM Uliginul CoiUraci Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order No. 1 Revised Conlracl Amount (including diis diange order) $566,506.50 0.00 37.842.00 $604,348.50 Recommended for Approval by: liONI'..S I UOO, ROSr.NF. ANDKRMK & AS.SOCTA HuS, INC. MUFI'AI.O lin UMINOUS Approved by Owner: CITY or OKONO cc: Owner Cniiliaclor Bonding Company Doiic.^lroo 8c A.s.soc, 13972/co wb! 1/1 Bonestroo ^ J Rosene Anderlik & ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects January 15, 1996 Soncstroo. Koteot. AnOerUk »m1 A uoc MUS. Inc U »»Af rifnwBv* Aellon/E(»ujl Opportunity Employpr Otto G. Bortestroo. P E PoDert W Rosene. PE* Joseph C. Anderlik. P E. Mjrvm L Sorvolj. P E. Richard E. Turr>ef. P£. Glenn R Cook. PE. Thomas L Moyes. P E. Roden G. Schunicht. P E. Susan Ml Fdertm. CJ*-A.* * Senior Consultant Howard A Sanford. FM. Keith A Gordon., PE. Roden R Pfefferfe. P E Richard W Foster PE Oavid O. Loskota. P E Roden C- Russek. A.I.A Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanson. P E. Michael T Rautmarwi. PE Ted K. Field. P E. Thomas R. Anderson. AIA James R Rosenmerkel. P E. Donald C. Burgardt. P E. Thomas A. Syfko. PE. Frederic J Stendorg, P E. Ismael Manmei. P E Michael P Rau. P E Thomas W Peterson. PE Michael C. Lynch. P.E. James R. Maland. P.E. Jerry O Pemsch. P E. Scott J Arganek. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE Mark R Rolfs. P £ Mark A. Seip. PC. Gary W. Morien. P C. Paul J. Ganrson. A.I.A. Daniel J Edgenon. P & A Rick Schmidt. P L Dale A. Grove. P.L PNllp J. Caswell. P C. Mark D Wallis, P E. Miles B Jensen. PE. L Phillip Gravel. P.E Karen L Wiemerl, P E. Gary D. Kristofitx. P E. Brian K. Gage. P E F. Todd Foster. PE. Keith R. Yapp. P E Douglas J. Benoit. P E Shawn D Gustafson. P E Ceciilo OUvier. PE. Kent X Wagner. PX Paul G Heuer. P E John P. Gorder. PE. Dan D. Boyum. PX Jeffrey J. Ehleringer. PX Joseph E Rhetn. PX Lee M. Mann. PE. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Agrses M. Ring James F. Engeihardt Mr. Ronald Moorse, Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Watertown Road Culvert SAP 152-103-1 File No. 13972 Honorable Mayor and City Council: Enclosed is Change Order No. 2 for the Watertown Road Culvert Improvement Project. This Change Order results in an increase in the Contract in the amount of $44,041.65, to a revised Contract amount of $648,390.15. This Change Order provides for a bituminous overlay and pavement striping of Watertown Road from Wear Lane to Stubbs Bay Road. This Change Order results in a 14.45 percent total increase over the original Contract amount. We recommend approval of Change Order No. 2 as submitted. Yours ver>' truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. Enel. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 6I2-636*4600 •• • - % Bonestroa Rosme Andtms, Associate] miiitfri & ArcNttcti UUM^mawlM. Owner: City of Oroiio, P.O. Box 66. Cn-stal Bay. MN 55323 Date Jan. 16. 1996 Contractor Buffalo Biaminoua. 2852 County RJ. 12 N. Buffalo. MN 55313 Change Order No. 2 Bond Co. #B 2576047 Cobb-Strecker-Dunphy & Zimmerman. 150 S 5th St. #2000. MdIs. MN 55402 CHANGE ORDFR NO. 2 MUNICIPAI, ATATI! All) IMPROVEMENTS WATERTOWN ROAD - SAP 152-103-01 File No. 13972 Desi'ri|i(ion of Work Tliis Clinngc Order providc.s for hiinmin(>u<: tnerlay and striping cf Watertown Road from Wear Lane to Sluhl« Bay Road No.Item Unit Coiitracl Ouantitv Unit Price TolsU Amount 2331.5 AC-1 bllumlnoas for inixlurc TN 92 125.00 11.498.73 2331.51 Type 41 wearing course mix TN 1.507.96 17.50 26.389.30 2357.5 Dihiminous malcrini for lack coat GL 450 1.00 450.00 564.603 4’^ wide solid line, yellow paint LF 14,214 0.20 2.842.80 564.603 4** wide solid line, white paint LF 14.304 0.20 2.860.80 44.041.rt5 13972/CO v/b I Original Contract Amount Previous Qiange Orders No. I Tills Cliange Order No. 2 Revised Contract Amount (including tills cliange order) $566,506.50 37.842.00 44.041,65 $648,390.15 Recommended for Approval by: nONESTROO, KOSENIi; ANDCRLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Coiiiracior: BUFFALO BITUMINOUS cc: Owner Conlratior Bonding Cuiiipany Bonesuoo & Assoc. 13972/CO wbl daUt: Approved by Owner CITV OF ORONO i I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION % % V DATE: February X. 996 ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ____________________ Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Payment Request for Highway 12 Semaphore and Safety Improvement Project The Council has approved agreements with MnDOT. for the semaphore at Willow Drive and Hiehway 12 and the safety improvements on Highway 12. that provide for City costs not to exceed $41,185.80 for the semaphore and $135,049.58 (plus $8,750.00 for a sidewalk) for the safety improvements. MnDOT is now requesting payment of the final cost amount for the sen-.phore in the amount of $37,542.96. MnDOT is also requesting $143,874.97 as the City’s estimated cost for the .safety improvements (excluding the cost of the sidewalk). Staff is recommending payment of the $37,542.96 for the semaphore. In keeping within the cost parameters set by the Council for the safety improvement project, staff is recommending payment of the approved amount of $135,049.58. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve payments to MnDOT in the amounts of $37,542.96 for the Willow and 12 semaphore and $135,049.58 for the Highway 12 safety improvements; to be funded from the MSA fund in the amount of $148,942.54. and from the PIR fund in the amount of $23,650. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Febniai5?t21, 19^ \ ITEM NO: /()\ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administrator 7^Item Description: Valek Request For One-Half Acre Parcel tor Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator ’s Report Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Minutes of November 28, 1994 Council Meeting Map of Saga Hill Area With Public R-O-W Highlighted Map showing Valek Property and Existing and Proposed R-O-W Map and Info Comparing Amount of R-O-W to Be Vacated vs. R-O-W to be Acquired, on the Valek Property When the 9 1/2 acre Saga Hill tax forfeit parcel became available to the city, the Valek ’s requested that a 1/2 acre parcel from the tax forfeit parcel be added to the rear of their existing lot. The city agreed, with the condition that the existing right-of-way through the Valek property to the tax forfeit parcel be maintained on the Valek ’s propert>' but moved trom the middle to the edge of the Valek propeny. (Please see the attached Council meeting minutes rellecting the Council ’s action.) The purpose of maintaining the right-of-way is to ensure access to the tax forfeit propeny as it becomes used for a future park. The current right-of-way width through the Valek propeny is 10 feet. This is the current standard for a bike trail, which would not leave any room for maintenance ot the trail. Staff is recommending the right-of-way be increased to a minimum of 20 feet to provide a workable potential access to the park. The Valek ’s have requested that the 1/2 acre parcel be added to their lot without the condition of maintaining a right-of-way through their propeny. They have indicated that either the existing Garden Lane right-of-way or an easement through the church parking lot to the west could be used for future park access. Garden Lane does not provide a link to the 9 acre tax forfeit parcel except at the far nonhwestem end of the Ume. This is not an acceptable access to the park land especially it i is the only access. If additional land between Garden Lane and the nine acre parcel is acquired for park land this may be a more workable access. However, this has not occurred to this point. Pativ Affeldt. representing the Fairview Church, recently contacted the city to indicate an interest in providing an easement through the church parking lot and the church open space area to the tax forfeit parcel. 1 have asked that a letter clarifying and confirming this interest be provided to the city in time for the February 26 Council meeting. This easement could provide an acceptable access to the park area in which case the Valek right-ot-way may not be nee e . V k - k■ir 'P Request for CouncO Action continued page 2 of 2 February 21, 1996 Valek Request For One-Half Acre Parcel At this time it is unclear what the optimum option for access to the park mi^ht be. Therefore, it is best to keep all options open by either maintaining the right-of-way on the Valek property, or by continuing action regarding the Valek parcel until a determination is made regarding access to the open space property. COUNCIL ACTION REQLT:STED: A Motion to confirm the Council’s approval of the addition of 1/2 acre of the tax forfeit parcel to the rear of the Valek ’s property with the condition that the Valek ’s deed a 20 foot right-of-way to the city as access to the potential park area. B.Continue action regarding the Valek property to enable time to determine the best access option for the open space property. ^ I* • ^ ___ CTTi COUNC-:- Kao^N 2s. iw-i / ----“'“■r^:;7"i;r”“’^^”‘”r^i7'”p-fr^j^^^^''-"Ccnricuc'd) (Sz22 Hili Tix rorre:t i^cp-‘0 • u k rnperrv belne for public use. and yet, by a trade. ih« iabbourwascoDCsni«a wi^sp • for tte devdooe. TheBridgswood Gey ^vouid, in his opie^oei. p^„i ti-.,. represenistive said they would no J ^ ^ rjjj sosidn prooeny. Coundl memoets are too many eaviromsotd ^u. developer but only the good said they ccuid not be ccn>--*^ o>-ne'^ Hurr noted that this ac^ruishion was resoK'ed of the puoilc where irus lane .s cone with the Council by Briagewooc Ln January of !99u, and no negonauons ... on this properr/. ■ n <ioden' was represented by Parrtoa .^eidt and Irene SHb^ Tdc Sa^ Hiil Preser%-ation 5 5 parcel for puouc use. renur.d Tne.r purpose was to see that tne C-^ar^ ask the City to assign tne Park _ the Couccii of the Cir/s related the history of tine area ana notec Comirjssion to study Saga Tchtlrch property'. The Oroco Park borvey was ar. access available to the parw-‘ - ^ showed the public's concern wnin brousbt to the CounciVs an^ticn. *ne ^ ,:,ev preser^ms more narurai ‘^'^.“Y-^‘pre'si%-es even though the majority of those polled „ s.=«. - .p. :o devdopn-.ont of on-.irorm==.nl!y ^f.-^“'';l-.j,„rrrorvodon of Loke NUnnr-.onta was Orono NUnagen-.on: Soc.eo, f«is any dovelopn-.en: o: the guiding pnoctple oi .be City. Planning Pouctes Sana Kiil would aceot t.be lake, Th for etrvironmental sensitivity, fooicate that Riral development snould oe sc........... . „n 9ocetv ."at thev aoorove of the Valek's obtatmng -vM conuitented bv the Preser.ation Socety t..ai i , . .cne-W acre of addtdonal latxi for fneu .nropetty. ’ A ! e2ssrnc2t from ihe souin or r,-.-.ss to the jrope.slwakasg^:^- ' , ~ i.... -„es tni-oJ5ririI5«l orooeovwniS^Suibik^^ croce.Ty. ^ -liri~h"' wo.ild coSdSl^s oropoa^-XiClKheir DiooetTv. ano_t heWi?« s said Jiey a .o---------- V ffisTJTES Or THE PiGULAR ORONO Cm* COUNCIL HELD ON NOV-e.EERZS. 1994 (Sas2 K21 Tax ForrsrTPro?^-' - acauisitioa. Stzn’s thinking ,3 see where the best locnhon would be Couocii feels the area scould .^ve some .v-pc Ka.y s^d hea spacer of perMaad aad fed. i. i. b«t a. pre.on = l^d where we can. HU. dso vdced her .^PP="“^%dd ,S Srat" to add the additionai one-haii acre to met. .^DCa., access moved to the side of the Valek property. Mavor Callahan asked whe-xer any addkioaal acioc needed to be taken 'ey the Coundl. Mo'oese said a new resohroon would need to be anopted. A ▼ A w ^ — ,. ^ th#» Valek's should accuire the sceciued land. Callahan commented that aU concerned .. developed la that He noted the need to be s^stuve to P^ Commissions be involved in the stuoy “imUet; d. not feel a souoy tvns oeaessasy at this time, only the acquismon of the parcel. During discussicn, several neighbors in the Saga Hill area etepressed then- favoring the land as parkland. .ajpprov .ajl of >iintjtes (*=2) MIXTOG of C.A wNV.ASSING BO.ARD NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Jabbouf moved. Keiley seconded, to approve the .Minutes or tne Canvass, g Bk.ar Meeting held on November 9, 1994. .Ayes 4, Na.vs 0. (*=5) [. 1?94 Jabbour moved, KeUev* seconded, to approve the Nfinutes or the Reg ’ular Cin Co Meerrna of November 14, 1994. Ayes 4, Nays 0. rt\ n 1 ^ r?^ • i*“t:*Trru^a2U3:Ji I n t d^ •4» ^ TTf iui I e:?3L?j;!d (^ «'?) 1 52?o;-:!5 «* A3s:^ (5^ (ni I? @> o Oil CI£37i^" <C^^/y?/'c <*/ (1^ ': -B^St P ms Iuc 2T.m‘A , 5jni 1 __ 1 r -• 3L’-M i« V S ■'•' I L_ • %i / r V |V 1j "^5 J Jl^ ^ • \ c 1 nrj 1 .. 18) Ti M •■ <7)<» r^f-'--g /V ■V^./ t 1 ff ftta ff Li 1 4* r lfu»l 1#^ .« W /,rc'i^ v«i -•« (/^ (w^ ji (jjB^ ^'I d7?o2> Oi ■‘'•-V .-/.vi.''’ f/ T.. '‘V. < lU. /CA'y ^• /"r30o'± I 5h ti ' lio /-- X * — * 4. ‘i v. (4 ) t#!k]” ;iiA7HI!lW7 i*:? / (i * V; ■ '•’I '^/m « '^■'11^ :? :J^ x-Am. - ^’Af , tjji ^^<o. SAK!DEt3sigi^^ :ih=^. ' -•« » li« M f------- - ------- ;•« r^ JO' AueV CitV TO \lt\c^ve■ V. ^ p d r ..Sj REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \DATE: Febift^^22. ^9^ ITEM NO: / / %, >9o^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administrator Administrptoi; Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Descnption: Volunteer Commission Appointments The terms of three Planning Commissioners will expire on March 31, 1996. One of these is Candace Rowlette, who has resigned from the Commission. Also, the terms of two Park Commissioners expired on December 31, 1995. Planning Commission The remaining Planning Commission members whose terms are expiring are Steve Peterson who was initially appointed on March 9, 1992, and Charles Schroeder who was initially appointed on April 22, 1991. Park Commission The two Park Commissioners whose terms are expiring are Robert Howells, who was initially appointed in Februar>' of 1992; and Andrew McDermott III, who was originally appointed in July of 1995. The Council may at this time want to make a preliminary determination regarding the eligibility of the commissioners for additional terms. Based on this determination staff will contact the commission members as to their interest in serving an additional term. When the number of vacancies is known, staff will advertise for applicants in the local newspapers. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to direct staff to contact commission members to determine their interest in serving an additional term. L^. J REQtJEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ DATE: February 23, 19% ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administrator Adn^istrator Reviewed: Vy Agenda Section: Administrator’s Report Item Description: Saga Hill Tax Forfeit Parcel Update I have attached a letter from Patty Affeldt of the Saga Hill Preservation Society expressing several concerns regarding the status ot the tax torteit parcel and requesting a resolution to confirm the city’s position regarding the parcel. Staff have made clear to the County in writing that the city continues its strong interest in acquiring the full 9 acre parcel for public use. Staff have indicated a number of serious concerns and problems with tiying to develop the northern portion of the parcel for residential use. A meeting has been scheduled with the County Tax Forfeit Property statY on February 29 to further confirm the city’s interest in the full parcel, and to further clarify concerns and problems related to developing the northern half of the property for residential use. A redrafted resolution reconfirming the city’s interest in the full parcel, and requesting written confirmation from the County tliat the parcel will be withheld from the spring 1996 public auction process is attached for Council review and approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution requesting conveyance of the tax forfeit parcel to the city for public use. - ^ The Saga Hill Preservation Society 4625 W. Branch Road Orono, Mn 55364 City of Orono Orono City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE; Tax Forfeit Parcel P.I.D. No. 07-117-23 23 0001. Dear Mayor Callahan and Members of the Orono City Council: On behalf of the Saga Hill Preservation Society I want to thank you for your efforts to obtain the above parcel as city park and open space. position to something less than preserving the enure p^cel i„ ,he mtnds if an Ldved parties, we ask that the City of Orono reaffirm its position by adopting the enclosed resolution. Moreover it has come to our attention that this parcel may be included on ihe W6 mx forfeit land public auction. To date the City of Snurinrndedlo'li^maTet ii^Ls our 'wS ^“1 “ r'iik'for^irrcontinuing iur cooperative effort to improve our city ’s envirommem to the benefit ot all. Thank vou for your kind attention. J- - I • RESOLUTION REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT LAND AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS Whereas, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota; VVliereas, on January 10, 1994, the Orono City Council adopted Resolution No.3379, requesting that a tax forfeit parcel described as P.I.D. No. 07-117-23 23 0001 be conveyed to the City of Orono: Whereas, on December 12, 1994, the Orono City Council adopted Resolution No. 3511, requesting asain that a tax forteit parcel described as P.I.D. No. 07-117-23 23 0001 be conveyed to the Citv of Orono: NOW I'HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the City of Orono reaffirms the above-stated resolutions and requests that the entire 9.35 acre tax forfeit parcel be conveyed to the City of Orono for park and open space purposes at no cost, with the exception of a 0.5 acre portion conveyed to Steven and Joan Valek. 2. That city staff, including the city attorney, is directed to use all effort to effecmate said conveyance to the City of Orono. 3. That the Saga Hill Preserv-ation Society shall be included in all discussions, meetings. and other effons to obtain said conveyance. 4. That the City of Orono requests that Hennepin County confirm in writing by no later tlian March 4. 1996. that said parcel will be withheld from sale at the Spring 1996 tax forfeit land sale. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of February. 1996. by a vote ot____Ayes and Navs. Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin Citv Clerk Mii REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT l.AND WHEREAS, on January 10, 1994, the Orono City Council adopted Resolution No. 3379, requesting that a tax forfeit parcel described as P.I.D. No. 07-117-23 23 0001 be conveyed to the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 1994, the Orono City Council adopted Resolution No. 3511, requesting again that a tax forfeit parcel described as P.I.D. No. 07-117-23 23 0001 be conveyed to the City of Orono: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the City of Orono reaffirms the above-stated resolutions and requests that the entire 9.35 acre tax forfeit parcel be conveyed to the City of Orono for park and open space purposes at no cost, with the exception of a 0.5 acre portion to be conveyed to Steven and Joan Valek. 2. That the City of Orono requests that Hennepin County confirm in writing by no later than March 4, 1996, that said parcel will be withheld from sale at the Spring 1996 tax forfeit land sale. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of February, 1996. by a vote of ___ayes and_____nays. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor • • • • ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ilallin. City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ %. DATE: Febnfl^ 23, ^ ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin TiUe City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval No licenses COUTS ’CIL ACTION REQUESTED: fS* % IJp®A S3 Feb 1S9( Fri. 10:«S AM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Employee Name Check Number 040667 040667 CALLAHAN JR.« EDWARD J. Totals Check Number 040667 Check Number 040668 040668 GOETTEN, J. DIANN Totals Check Number 040668 ^ vi*ck Number 04 066 9 040669 KURR. JOELLEN L. Totals Check Number 040669 Check Number 040670 040670 JABBOUR, GABRIEL Totals Check Number 040670 Check Number 040671 040671 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Check Number 040671 Check Number 040674 040674 GAFFRON, WICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 040674 C.heck Number 040677 040677 JA^IIE L. Totals Check Number 040677 Check Number 040678 040678 ‘{ALLIN. DOROTHY M. Totals Check Number 040679 Check Number 040679 040679 HASEMA.N. CAPCLE A. Totals Check Number 040679 Qieck Cate 12-Feb-96 12-Feb-96 12-Feb-96 12-Feb-96 12-Feb-96 12-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 Check Amount 220.65 220.65 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 223.19 915.76 915.76 237. s6 237.36 917.47 917.47 752.38 752.39 I 23 rmh 1996 m 10:45 AM Gieck Register City of Orono Check HUnber employee Name Check Number 040680 040680 MCX)RSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 040680 Check Number 040681 040681 VEE, LINDA S Totals Check Number 040681 Check Number 040682 040682 KUEHN, THOMAS M Total# Check Number 040682 Qkeck Number 040683 040683 MILLER. CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 040683 3eck Number 04 0684 040684 OLSON. JOHN C, Total# Cieck Number 040604 Check Number 04 0685 040685 ANDERSON, BRUCE L Totals Check Number 040605 Check Number 040686 040686 BCB2IEN, S’JE A Total# Check Number 040686 Check Number 040687 O4C607 BORIS. SCOTT W Total# Check Number 040687 Check Number 040608 040688 CARLSON, MICHAEL B Totals Check Number 04U688 Check Number 040689 Check Date 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 Page 2 Check Amount 1.636.61 1.636.61 714.55 714.55 1.298.15 1.298.15 795.54 795.54 749.98 749.98 470.52 470.52 665.42 665.42 734.39 734.39 256.48 256.48 - :i Feb 1996 x0:45 AM Check Mumber Check Register City of Orono Employee Name Oeck iiui^r 040689 040689 CHESWICX. GARY B Totals Check Number 040689 rheck Number 040690 040690 CORNICK, JAMES L. Tcrals Check Number 040690 eck Number 040691 040691 DEMBOUSKI. JAY C Totals Check Number 04C691 Check Number 040692 040692 ENGLISH III. IRVING H, Totals Check Number 040692 .*heck Numbe r 040693 04069J ERICKSON. KURT R Totals Check Number 040693 heck Number 040694 040694 FISCHENICH. DAN T Totals Check Numoer 040694 neck Number 040695 340695 HANSING. CAROL J Totals Check Number 040695 ■'.'.eck Number 04 06 96 040696 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P Totals Check Number 040696 rh*ck Number 0406 97 040697 KNCLLENBERG. >31IST:N L Totals Check '-imber 04 06 97 Check Date 15-Feb-96 lS-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb- '6 15-Feb-96 Page 3 Check Amount 1,294.68 1,294.68 1,197.99 1,197.99 1,157.02 1,157.02 380.65 380.65 1,121.83 1,121.83 1.051.35 1.051.35 351.13 351.13 1.052.75 1.052.75 585.39 588.39 heck !iumber 040698 23 P«b 1996 Pri 10:45 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Employee Meae Check MUiter 040698 040698 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 040698 ^eck Number 040699 040699 MORCWCZYNSKI. JA^®S Totals Check Number 040699 [lieck number 040700 040700 PERSELL. WILLIAM R Totals Check Number 040700 Check Number 040701 040701 SCHOENHOFF. JCVSi B ‘ Totals Check Number 040701 Check Number 040702 040702 THC»TrON. MARK R Totals Check Number 040702 Check Number 040703 040703 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F Totals Check Number 040703 Check Number 040704 040704 TOMC2YK, MARK W Totals Check Number 040704 Check Number 0407C5 040705 FARNIOK, rCP.REY L Totals Check Number 040705 Check Number 040706 040706 FISCHER. CHRISTCPHER K Totals Check Number 040706 Check Number 040707 Check Date 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 Page 4 Check Amount 7’1.13 713.13 1.324.70 1.324.70 377.65 377.65 1.028.05 1.028.05 976.42 976.42 343.00 343.00 1.187.44 1.187.44 197.96 197.96 136.13 136.13 4 23 Feb Fri 10:45 AM Check Register City of Orcnc Check Nunber employee Heine Check number 040707 040707 MABUSTM. JEANNE A. Totals Check Nusiber 040*^07 Check Humber 040708 040708 OMAN. LYLE £. Totals Check Number 040708 Check Number 040709 040709 VANG. BRUCE L Totals Check Number 040709 heck Number 040710 040710 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J Totals Check Number 040710 Check Number 040711 040711 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F Totals Check Number 040711 Check Number 040712 040712 GERHARDSCN. JOHN R Totals Check Number 040712 Check Number 040713 040713 GREGORY. JAMES D Totals Check Number 040713 Check Number 040714 040714 HANSEN. STEVEN C Totals Check Nu'-ber 54C714 Check Number 040715 04C715 CBEFAIGNER. SCOTT G Totals Check Number :4C715 Jheck Number 040716 Check Date 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 l5-?eb-96 15-Fcb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 Page 5 Check Amount 1.159.53 1.159 53 1,136.25 1,136.25 949.10 949.10 53.57 53.57 1.056.64 1.05C.64 1.327.28 1.327.28 773 40 773.40 98C.20 980.20 902.37 902.37 r 23 P«b 1996 Prl 10:45 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Employee Kame Check Ihsnber 04071$ 04071$ 0SRIi3?« RANDY L. Totkls Check NUff^er 04071$ Check NUf^r 040717 040717 PALMER. GREGCRY A, Totels Qieck Nufnher 040717 Check Number 040718 04 0718 RATHBUN. BARRY J. Totels Check Number 040*’18 Check Humber 040719 040719 SKREEN. DALE S. Totels Check Number 040719 Check Number 040720 040720 PETERSON. JACK W Totels Check Number 040720 Oieck Number 040721 040721 STEFFENHAGEJI. RCNALD E Totals Check Number 040721 Grand Total Check Date 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 15 Feb-9*3 15-Feb-96 15-Feb-96 Page 6 Check Amount 395.71 395.71 670.23 670.23 947.59 947 59 60S 81 605.81 20.19 20.19 984.79 984.79 37,701.45 'Vr- rtb 19M jc 12:06 m Check Reflfster City of Orono Check Ruriaer Oete leck Ri^iaer sowr 50937 CITY COURTT CREDIT UNION U-Feto-96 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNIOH Total t Check Rveter 5C937 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNIffli heck Mt^r 50938 FIRST NATIONAL RANK OF LAKES 50938 50938 U-Feb-96 H-Feb-96 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Nunter 50938 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES ,3teck Ruiber 50939 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 50939 U-Feb-96 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Totals Check Ruiber 50939 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Check Niober 50940 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT t COLL 50940 14-Feb-96 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT t COLL Totals Check Nunber 50940 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT B COLL Check Nunber 50941 50941 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT B COLL 14-Feb-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT B COLL Totals Check Nuiber 50941 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT B COLL 3ieck Nunber 50942 ICMA RET1REPENT TRUST - 457 50942 14-Feb-96 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Nuiber 50942 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Nuiber 50943 50943 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 14-Feb-96 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Nurtser 50943 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Nuiber 50944 HN OEPT OF REVENUE 50944 14-Feb-96 HH DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Nunoer 50944 HN OEPT OF REVENUE Check Nunber 50945 MN MUTUAL LIFE 50945 14-Feb-96 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Nunber 50945 MN MUTUAL LIFE Transaction Aiaount 5,587.00 5,587.00 9,644.83 2,968.55 12.613.38 1,265.00 1,265.00 164.82 164.82 174.50 174.50 100.00 100.00 U.OO 0.00 2,843.21 2,843.21 55.00 55.00 Page 1 Coanunts SAVINGS U/N B TRANSFERREO FIT.FICA.HEOCR W/H FICA.MEOCR CITY SHARE DEFERRED COMP W/H THONTON iC0266780 SKREEN #C0262310 DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES W/H STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H I - 1.“. 7—Tr - aC»^ i el- •*! . — •k - iO"—T^r s Iiri—-rws HIM— wS r«b 1996 nm 2:3a PM Check Register City of Orono Check Date S0951 S0951 ALL STAft ELECTffIC 13-Feb-96 All STAi ELECTRIC Totals Check NijMser 50951 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Mck 50952 BARTON SAND A GRAVEL 50952 22-Feb-96 BARTON SANO A GRAVEL Totals Check Nvnber 50952 BARTON SANO A GRAVEL ^eck Nuiber 50953 BERGERSON-CASUELL INC. 50953 13-Peb-96 BERGERSON-CASUELL INC. Totals Check Nmber 50953 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC. Check N u Mmc 50954 BLACKOUIAIC A SON 50954 50954 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 BLACKOWIAK A SON BLACKOUIAIC A SON Totals Check Nuik>er 50954 BLACKOUIAK A SON Check Nunber 50955 C4RGILL SALT DIVISION 50955 50955 22-Fr 0-96 22-Feb-96 CARGILL SALT DIVISION CARGILL SALT DIVISION Totals Check Nvjnber 50955 CARGILL SALT DIVISION Check Nuiber 50956 CHUNKS LAKE SHORE AUTO 50956 50956 50956 50956 22-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Totals Check Number 50956 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Nuiber 50957 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 50957 13-Feb-96 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Totals Check Nunber 50957 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Check Nunber 50958 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. 50958 22-Feb-96 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. Totals Check Nunber 50958 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. Check Nunber 50959 CORNERHOUSE Transaction Aaount 508.86 508.86 5.805.01 5.805.01 347.00 347.00 19.06 168.58 187.64 2,147.23 3,687.53 25.12 16.20 223.67 162.33 427.32 871.23 871.23 158.80 158.80 Page 1 Cofiisents REPAIR SIREN L.S. i6 UTR SANO REPAIR PIPE-NAVARRE UTR JAN SERVICE JAN SERVICE ROAD SALT ROAD SALT #173 OIL CHANGE #167 REPLACE STROBE #169 BELTS & DIAG #169 THERMOSTATE & REPAIR FEB INSURANCE REPAIR LOOSE GROUND WIRE J 22 F«b 1996 Thu 2:38 PM Chtck Resfster City of Ofono Check Muiter Date Check Imter 50959 50959 CORNERNOUSE 22-Feb-96 CORRERHOUSC Totals Check liunber 50959 CORNERNOUSE Check UiMber 50960 CRYSTEEL 50960 13-Feb-96 CRYETEEL Totals Check Nuiber 50960 CRYSTEEL Check Nuiber 50961 CULL I GAN 50961 13-Feb-96 CULLlGAN Totals Check Nurber 50961 CULLlGAN .neck Ikflber 50962 CYS UNIFORHS 50962 22-Feb-96 CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 50962 CYS UNIFORMS Check Number 50963 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 50963 50963 50963 50963 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb*96 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION Totals Check Number 50963 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION heck Nurber 50964 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 50964 13-Few >6 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS Totals Check Nuiber 50964 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS :heck Nurber 50965 FEED RITE CONTROLS 50965 13-Feb-96 FEED RITE CONTROLS Totals Check Nuiber 50965 FEED RITE CONTROLS TrarmactIcR) AflSHjnt 1;038.00 1,038,00 79.18 79.18 29.90 29.90 12.68 12.68 69.20 762.63 271.61 2.24 1,105.68 16.18 16.18 20.00 20.00 Page 2 C«i»nts PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CYLINDER FEB, MARCH SERVICE NAME PLATES AS BUILTS PLANN COMM MINUTES ZONING FILES PARK COHN MINUTES TOPO MAPS CONTAINER CHARGE eck Norber 50967 G & K SERVICES 50967 22-Fcb-96 G & K SERVICES 8.15 RATHBUN 50967 22-Feb-96 G A K SERVICES 48.20 STREET EMPLOYEES 50967 22-Fcb-96 G A K SERVICES 2.60 STEFFENHAGEN 50967 22-Feb-<56 G A K SERVICES 40.84 FLOOR MATS 50967 22-Feb-96 G A K SERVICES 40.84 FLOOR MATS 50967 22-Feb-96 G A K SERVICES 8.15 RATHBUN . ~- 2 im N 2:3S ?n Check »r Cheek Ke^lfttr City of (h^ofio Pa^e 3 lieck n%mtmr 50967 50967 50967 50967 50967 50967 50967 50967 50967 Date 50967 G & K 22-Feb-96 22-Feb*96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G S K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G S K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES TotaU Check Nunter 50967 G S K SERVICES theck Nuiber 50968 GALL'S INC. 50968 50968 50968 50968 50968 ^leck Nuiber 50969 50969 50969 :heck Nunber 50970 50970 50970 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Number GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 50970 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. :heck Nurber 50971 50971 50971 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 13-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Totals Check Norber 50971 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE :heck Nurber 50972 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 50972 13-Feb-96 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN Totals Check Nuiber 50972 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN :heck Ntirber 50973 50973 H 4 L MESABI 13-Feb-96 H & L MESABI Transaction Amount 66.15 2.60 8.15 68.20 71.79 2.60 8.15 68.19 2.60 427.21 18.38 18.37 36.75 150.00 150.00 300.00 150.00 150.00 380.74 Comnents STREET EMPLOYEES STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN STREET EMPLOYEES FLOOR MATS STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN STREET employees STEFFENHAGEN 22-Feb-96 GALL'S INC.147.92 DASHMISER PLUS 22-Feb-96 GALL'S INC.66.94 UNDERCOVER FLASHER 13-Feb-96 CALL'S INC.439.92 OUTSIDE LIGHTS-NEU 13-Feb-96 GALL'S INC.41.94 REPLACEMENT STROBE 13-Feb-96 GALL'S INC.114.91 UNIFORM BOOTS Nvjnber 50968 GALL'S INC.811.63 50969 GENUINE PARTS CO. 13-Frt>-96 GENUINE PARTS CO.60.81 MISC PARTS 13-Feb-96 GENUINE PARTS CO.6.59 MISC PARTS 13-Feb-96 GENUINE PARTS CO.126.37 MISC PARTS Nuiter 50969 GENUINE PARTS CO.193.77 JANUARY SERVICE JANUARY SERVICE OLSON-MCFOA CONFERENCE HALLIN-MCFOA REGISTRATION 1996 BUDGET AWARD APPLICA CUTTING EDGES 22 1996 Thu 2:38 m Check Reflitter City of Ofono Check ihnber Oete Check Rurt^er 50973 H t L MESA81 Tetelt Check IhJkber 50973 N & L »«SAflI Check Muiter 50974 HEAITHPARTNERS 50974 22-Feb-96 HEAITHPARTNERS Totals Check Nuitwr 50974 HEALTHPARTHERS Check Ruiber 50975 tcm 50975 13-Feb-96 ICMA Totals Check Nuiter 50975 ICHA Check NiMber 50976 JOm BECKMAN 50976 22-F^-96 JOHN BECKMAN Totals Check Nunber 50976 JOHN BECKMAN Check Nkfiber 50977 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY 50977 13-Feb-96 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Totals Check Nunber 50977 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Check Nuiter 50978 50978 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 13-Feb-96 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Ninber 50978 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Nunber 50979 MACDONALD LABORATORIES 50979 22-Feb-96 MACDONALD LABORATORIES Totals Check Nunber 50979 MACDONALD LABORATORIES Check Nmber 50980 MAMA-LMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV 50980 13-Feb-96 MAMA-LMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV Totals Check NLirber 50980 MAMA-LMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV Check Nunber 50981 MEDICA CHOICE 50981 50981 50981 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE Totals Check Nunber 50981 MEDICA CHOICE Check Nmber 50982 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Transaction Aama^t 380.74 1,706.09 1,706.09 263.00 263.00 130.00 130.00 46.81 46.81 1,437.75 1,437.75 1,180.46 1,180.46 2,377.00 2,377.00 262.03 112.29 10,590.71 10,965.03 Pafle 4 Cos—nts march INSJRANCE 1996 DUES MISC. REPAIRS MAGAZINE FILES BACKHOE BUCKET #176 SET-UP 1996-1997 SUBSCRIPTION MARCH INSURANCE MARCH INSURANCE MARCH INSURANCE . •><«■ .1 .MMC. - 22 r«b 1996 Thu 2:38 m Chtck Chfck Register City Of Orono Chock Mukbor 50962 50962 Dot# 50962 miWO yASTE COiTRCX COMNISSIQII 13-F€b-96 METRO WASTE COMTRa COMMISSION 13-Ftb-96 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Totals Chock Nunbor 50962 KIM WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Chock Nuifcor 50983 50983 mXSA 22-Fob-96 MCCSA Totals Check Nunber 50983 MGCSA Chock NiJiR)er 50984 50984 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN CO^ANY 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Niri^r MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 50984 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Nioter 50985 50985 MINNESOTA CONWAY 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Nunber MINNESOTA CONWAY 50985 MINNESOTA CONWAY Check Nunber 50986 50986 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Nunber MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 50986 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Check Nunber 50987 50987 50987 50987 50987 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Fcb-96 Totals Check Number MN DEPT OF HEALTH MN DEPT OF HEALTH MN DEPT OF HEALTH MN DEPT OF HEALTH 50987 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Nunber 50988 50988 MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC. 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Number MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC. 50988 MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC. Check Nunber 50989 50989 50989 50989 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 13-Feb-96 13-Fcb-96 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Number MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY HN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 50989 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Check Number 50990 MOROWCZYNSXI, JIM Transaction Aisount 23,746.00 841.50 24,587.50 50.00 50.00 45.00 45.00 166.41 166.41 10.00 10.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 320.00 100.00 100.00 4.00 4.00 24.00 32.00 Pago 5 Cofiments MARCH SAC CHARGES STEFFENHAGEN-SEMINAR MEDICAL OXYGEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER RECHARG APPLICATOR LICENSE RATHBUN-SEMINAR 06ERAIGNER-SEMINAR HANSEN-SEMINAR BRINKHAUS-SEMINAR 1996 DUES 1996 EMISSION TESTING 1996 EMISSION TESTING 1996 EMISSION TESTING ^2 Feb 1996 rhu 2:38 PM Check leg!Stef City of Orono *otals Check Ntrijer 50993 NSP Check NiJitjer 50994 OFFICE DEPOT Check Nuitjer 50995 OMAN. LYLE 50995 22-Feb*96 OMAN, LYLE Totals Check Nurtjer 50995 OMAN. LYLE Check Number 50996 PIONEER 50996 50996 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Ntinber 50996 PIONEER leek Nuit)er 50997 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 50997 50997 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 RC IDENTIFICATIONS RC IDENTIFICATIONS 944.83 55.20 55.20 45.50 75.31 120.81 2.40 12.00 Page 6 ChMk Transaction Nvnber Date Hmrn Afflount Coranents h«ck Nuiter 50990 HOftOUeZYNSKt. JtN S0990 13-F.b-96 MOMMCZYNSKl, JIM 49.99 SHOES REIMS Totals Check Nurber 50990 MOROWCZTNSKl, JIM 49.99 heck Nuiber 50991 NAAB, TERRI 50991 22-F.b-96 NAAB. TERRI 50.00 PURCHASE OF Totals Check Nuiter 50991 NAAB, TERRI 50.00 heck Nueber 50992 NAVARRE HAROUARE 50992 13-Feb-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.26 MISC PARTS 50992 13-Feb-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 463.06 MISC PARTS 50992 13-Feb-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.14 MISC PARTS 50992 l3-Feb-96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 158.52 MISC PARTS Totals Check Nijiber 50992 NAVARRE HARDWARE 639.^ Check NiJiber 50993 NSP 50993 22-Feb-96 NSP 69.92 HSP CHARGES 50993 22-Feb-96 NSP 753.24 NSP CHARGES 50993 22-Feb-96 NSP 121.67 NSP CHARGES 50994 22-Feb-96 OFFICE DEPOT 56.38 REM BALANCE DUE 50994 22-Feb-96 OFFICE DEPOT 419.81 MISC SUPPLIES Totals Check Nurber 50994 OFFICE DEPOT 476.19 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS O'SULLIVAN PETITION EMPLOYEE ID CARDS EMPLOYEE ID CARDS ^ < .K . »> t w Ai: a F«b 19M riiy 2:38 PM Check iesister City of Orono Check Check 50W7 50997 Date Hmm 50997 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 22-Feb-96 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 22-Feb-96 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totilt Check Nuriber 50997 RC IDENTIFICATIONS pieck Nuiber 50996 50998 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES 13-Feb-96 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Totals Check Nunber 50998 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Nuvber 50999 50999 ROLLINS OIL CO. 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Nuiber ROLLINS OIL CO 50999 ROLLINS OIL CO, Check Nuwbep 51000 51000 51000 SA-AG INC. 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 SA-AG INC. SA-AG INC. Totals Check Number 51000 SA'AG INC. Check Nvjrtber 51001 51001 SAFE BENEFITS 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Ncuber SAFE BENEFITS 51001 SAFE BENEFITS Check Nwrber 51002 51002 SNYDER DRUG STORES 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Narber SNYDER DRUG STORES 51002 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Ntnber 51003 51003 STAR TRIBUNE 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Nurber STAR TRIBUNE 51003 STAR TRIBUNE Check Ntnber 51004 51004 STATE OF MINNESOTA 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Nurbcr STATE OF MINNESOTA 51004 STATE OF MINNESOTA Check Nurber 51005 51005 STREICHERS 13-Fcb-96 Totals Check Nurber STREICHERS 51005 STREICHERS Transactfon Aiaount 12.00 218.23 2U.63 6,671.43 • m m m m m m 6,671.43 255.44 255.44 2,431.97 2,731.28 5,163.25 1,088.60 1,088.60 1.67 1.67 24.05 24.05 40.00 40.00 28.70 28.70 Page 7 Coms^ts EMPLOYEE ID CARDS EMPLOYEE ID CAROS MARCH ASSESSING FEE miQH OIL AM) FILTERS UTR SAND UTR SAND ADOa RECRilREO FUNDS FILM SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL ANNUAL INSPECTION #175 MAP LIGHT 22 F«b 19M Thu 2:38 FN ClMck fr Cheek Rcflister City of Oreno Otcck Nuiter 51006 Dote New 51006 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 13-Feb*96 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS TotiU Check Nuitwr 51006 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS Check NuilKr 51007 51007 51007 SURPLUS OPERATIONS 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 Toteie Check Nvjiter SURPLUS OPERATIONS SURPLUS OPERATIONS 51007 SURPLUS OPERATIONS Check Nuiber 51008 51008 town t COUNTRY 13-Feb-96 Totals Check NiMber TOWN t COUNTRY 51008 TOWN t, COUNTRY Check Noitier 51009 510T^ TRI STATE PUMP 13-Feb-96 Totals Check NuiR>er TRI STATE PUMP 51009 TRI STATE PUMP Check Noi^r 51010 51010 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Number TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. 51010 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. Check Ntinber 51011 51011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 13-Feb-9o Totals Check Nmber UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 51011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Check NLiiber 51012 51012 51012 51012 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Nuiber US WEST COMWINICATIONS US WEST COHMMICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 51012 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check NuTber 51013 51013 51013 51013 51013 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 13-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 13-Feb-96 Totals Check Nunber VILLAGE CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET VILLAGE CHEVROLET VI LI ACE CHEVROLET 51013 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Check Niiiber 51014 WARNING LITES OF MM Transaction Aanunt 2.068.24 2.068.24 10.00 18.50 28.50 49.55 49.55 359.35 359.35 428.48 428.48 36.85 36.85 26.63 63.68 133.13 223.44 1,080.22 188.10 26.70 32.67 1,327.69 Pase 8 CoRiaents LANIER 1140 FAX DESK DUFFEL BAG, SUNGLASSES TRASH LINERS REPAIR G.S. #6 REPAIR PW OVERHEAD DOOR LANGANKI-SHIRT US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES N426 GOVENOR #422 GAS TANK A BRACKET THERMOSTAT A GASKET #426 HEADLAMP S r«b 19«riM 2:36 M 1dieck iegtster City of Orono Page 9 Cfiack Date Tranaaction taoiffit Cooinenta 51014 IMNIIIG LITES Of MN 13-ftb-96 MAIMING IITES Of m51014 Totals Check NuMbtr 51014 MANNING LITES Of NN Check n%mt%r 51015 MEST PUBLISHING CONP. 51015 22-feh-96 MEST PUBLISHING CONP. Totals Check Noiter 51015 MEST PUBLISHING CONP. Check Nuaber 51016 MESTONKA CHAMEN OF COMMERCE 51016 22-Feb-96 UESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Totals Check H^mter 51016 UESTONKA CHAMBER OF CC3MERCE Check NiJHber 51017 WIDMER INC 99.05 99.05 BARRICADE RENTAL U.73 44.73 1996 CRIMINAL LAM BOOIC 111.00 111.00 1996 DUES 51017 22-Feb-96 UIDMER INC 1,473.00 SUR MAIN REPAIR-PARTENMOQ 51017 22-Feb-96 WIDMER INC 1,077.00 REPAIR UTR MAIN BREAK Totals Check Number 51017 UIDMER INC 2,550.00 :heck NuiN)er 51018 YOCUM OIL CC INC. 51018 22-Feb-96 YOCUM OIL CO INC.52.90 HEATING OIL 51018 22-Feb-96 YOCUM OIL CO INC.139.91 HEATING OIL 51018 13-Feb-96 YOCUM OIL CO INC.1,541.46 DIESEL FUEL Totals Check Number 51018 YOCUM OIL CO INC.1,734.27 :heck Nimber 51019 ZIEGLER 51019 22-Feb-96 ZIEGLER 108.94 PARTS FOR ROAD GRADER 51019 22-Feb-96 ZIEGLER 12.08 PINS 51019 22-Feb-96 ZIEGLER 189.50 PARTS FOR ROAD GRADER 51019 22 Feb-96 ZIEGLER 8.31 PIN Totals Check Nimber 51019 ZIEGLER 318.83 Srand Total 85,246.91 22 F«b 1996 Thu 3r03 PN Check Cheek Reflister City of Orooo Check Nuiter 51020 Date Maw 51020 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 22-Feb-96 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK Totals Check Nuiter 51020 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK Check N«jiR>er 51021 51021 51021 51021 OJHMISSION OF 1ANSPORTATICN 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 22-Feb-96 Totals Check Nmter COMMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION C0M1ISSI0N OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION 51021 COMMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION Check Nunber 51022 51022 FIRST TRUST 22-Feb-96 Totals Check NuMwr FIRST TRUST 51022 FIRST TRUST Transaction Amount 75.00 75.00 37,542.96 23.643.82 111,405.76 172,592.54 954.75 954.75 Pase 1 Coaments CniGINAL ISSUE FEE HWY 12/WIUOW SEMAPHORE HUY 12 STORM SWR-NON MSA HWY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT FINAL-1985 G.O. BONDS Grand Total 173,622.29 I Ftb 1996 m 12:06 vn Check Register City of Orono Chocic Date 50946 50946 m STATE RETIRENENT-OEF COMP 14-Fcb-96 m STATE RETIRENENT-OEF COMP Totals Check NtMber 50946 NN STATE RETIRENENT-DEF CONP fitck nuBter 50947 PEBSC0/06RA 50947 14-Feb-96 PEBSC0/06RA TotalB Qieck Muiter 50947 PEBSCO/OBRA hack Niflter 50946 PEBSCO/US CONF OF NAYORS 50948 14-Feb-96 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 50946 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS hack Nvnber 50949 PERA 50949 50949 14-Feb-96 14-Feb-96 PERA PERA Totals Check Nimber 50949 PERA hack nwter 50950 UNITED WAY 50950 14-Feb-96 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 50950 UNITED WAY rand Total Transaction Aanunt 150.00 150.00 89.60 89.60 1,485.00 1,485.00 3,633.13 4,759.96 8,393.09 29.00 29.00 32,949.60 • .Page 2 Connenta DEFERRED CCM> W/M OBRA DEFERRED COMP U/H USCM DEFERRED COMP U/H PERA EMPLOYEE U/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H I r T e^T rm ■ r INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCLMEETM FEB 2 6 1996 CITYOFONONO OF MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON JANUARY 23, 1996 The regular neetlng of the Board of Education of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on January 23, 1996. Present: Martha Van de Ven Pasela Schroeder Thomas Mich Peg Swanson Jack Veach Neal Lawson Absent: John Maresh Board member Bob Hoerr arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Pamela Schroeder, seconded by Jack Veach, the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the January 9, 1996 regular meeting; accepted the resignation of Beverly L. Ebbecke, Schximann Elementary teacher, effective at the end of her 1995-96 contract; accepted the resignation of Tim Moynihan as head tennis coach for the boys tennis team, effective January 23, 1996; approved the request of Sara Engel to continue her special assignment to the Ridgedale Alternative Program, operated by Intermediate School District #287 for the 1996-97 school year; approved the request of Heidi Mohagen, elementary school teacher, for a child care leave for the 1996-97 school year; accepted donations from the following: Cheryl Karakash: several computer education programs for the the Apple HE and Apple GS computer Maple Plain Lions: $200.00 to the Athletic Department to be used as needed Kathleen Schneibel: weight room equipment approved the Activity Fund Report for the Second Quarter, 1995; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 090891 through 091149 and office checks as covered by vouchers 5410 through 5488. Motion carried. Board members Maresh and Hoerr absent. J Dr. Mich infomed the Board of the process that is followed when school is closed due to incleaent weather and also that in addition to WCCO radio« the District will also be providing notices on KSTP Channel 5 as an additional source of notification to parents regarding school closings. Dr. Mich reported that on the Consent Agenda this evening, the Board had approved the continued eeployinont of Sara Engel to the Intermediate District #287 Learning Center, and accepted resignations from Bev Ebbeche, Schumann Elementary teacher, and Tim Moynihan, boys tennis team coach; that the group of citizens voricing on the ice arena will be meeting with Neal and himself on January 24 at 4;00 p.m. and Board members are welcome to attend; that on January 26 the Recognition Luncheon will be held and Board members are invited to attend; that on February 1 at 7:30 p.m. there will be a meeting held for legislative purposes in Room 103 of the high school; that he would be conducting a Peer Review class on February 5 and 6 and that Board members are welcome to stop by; that Pat Jones, Peg Swanson and he had provided a presentation at the MSBA Convention in Minneapolis on assessing staff development programs; that Peg Swanson was elected by MSBA membership to serve as their vice president and he expressed congratulations to Ms. Swanson. Mr. Kent Johnson of Ehlers and Associates presented to the Board the bids that were received for the purchase of the Tax Anticipation Certificates and recommended that the Board accept the low bid of A. H. Williams & Company, Inc. Member Bob Hoerr introduced the following resolution, moved to waive the reading of the resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND AWARDING THE SALE OF CERTIFICATES ON FILE IN DISTRICT OFFICE L. Ms. Julie Palmer, past chair of the Orono Education Fund, provided the Board with information on the work of this organization and stated that the orono Education Fund board is thrilled with the support that is received from the community. She stated that there has not only been an increase in dollars received but also an increase in the number of donors which covers a broad range of the community including people with children presently in school as veil as people who no longer have children in the system. She expressed appreciation to everyone for their support of this organization and she acknowledged Judy Micke, Orono School District office, for her work with this committee each year. Dr. Mich expressed appreciation to Julie Palmer for her work these past years and he welcomed Pam Henjum, the new chair for this organization. Dr. Mich also expressed appreciation to everyone who contributes so generously to the Orono Education Fund which provides additional opportunities for students in the classroom and scholarships for the graduating seniors. On behalf of the organization, crystal apples were presented to past president, Julie Palmer and Gretchen Amis, board member who has finished her term of service. Dr. Mich provided the Board with an update on legislative issues and the areas of concern for education today reiterating that through AMSD and MSBA such issues/concerns are watched carefully during the legislative session. By consensus of the Board, local legislative representatives will be invited to a Board meeting which will provide opportunity for the Board to inform them of its official position on issues/concerns. At this time the meeting was recessed after which the Board held a workshop session for the purpose of continuing discussion regarding the issues that surfaced during the recent bond referendxm election. At 10:15 p.m. the Board meeting was reconvened and entered into an executive session for discussion relative to the performance of an employee. The Board meeting was reconvened at 11:58 p.m. Chairperson Van de Ven stated that the Board, in executive session, discussed the performance of an employee. T1i« consensus of the Board was to hold the February 13 neetinq at 5:00 p.a. Adainistration will pursue this possibility. UPON MOTKNI Jack Veach, seconded by Panels Schroeder, the nesting was adjourned. Motion carried. Margaret/C. Swal^bn, Clerk r.f ^ha Van de' Yen, dhair L. I .1. ••AJ * I • • *-ifi ii ♦ t it iii>n i ^ i m m j inrt i«t*r r< Westonka CommunitY Action Network ■ EmSl^ency Assistance "Meals on Wheels "Human Services "job Development Placement 5600 Lynwood Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 (612) 472-0742 (612) 472-5589 (FAX) atRVICE ARCA Mound lnce;:endtnc« Rocktorti Ixreno St Bomficius Ma: « Pjm Sorng Park Mir.nttonM Bucn Tbno Bay Mi?netnsta Western Orono ■OATO OF DIRECTORS CrtiQ Afi^tfion 5: jofu-Wmttnsti Cfimt Lerry Bmwf Dirtaof at mst mimepm PiOUc SiflFy Mery De¥lfm«y msronna foocsfmtt Coon/mMor RoMMrte Fabr#Q*-Sivyd*r Cc'rr'unrfy ^unmr Tbm OamM Bustntssmsn Stev« Harp#it»d ^owwer Lett Harrell ^4ouna RHcr Chief Mery Hurley ACijfT BiSiC iMMhon RroQnm Mgr Mervln .lolmeoe of i.KJepnxJence Sharon McMenemy Cooii ,\:rj¥9st B*m ^tct Prmoent Sariy Dieted Ps'^sn Nuru Kata Rartelna S;-?c i. EtJucrv'^ Teichgr Ken Ribe P?ror jf ftrst Pmffytenen Church Richard ScWaHer LXJ/ -Vfomay ' «ndy SImer •: Stifl Minger rf. Michael Tageder Pis*cr Our Ljoy of tht Ljke Church B od Tomelka i*yiu^!6er *.'■^1 Watt . Chjrryher-Acm Asst ACMINISTRATION Kiki Sonnan f»' ^:iv9 Director >4 A Mia Halnaa V'-ntsfrartva Ass^s/jnf Diana McCurry .ffffr CoorCtnUoriProgriTi Mjnsgff rick Polaneki :: 5 i Business Deye^opment Unde Robarda f (Tyrrvnf 5jfcu«s/ 1 .ifwr CounseHjf nQ ao,'!) February 15, 1996 Mayor and CounciImembers of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor and Counciliriembers of Orono, WeCAN requests the City of Orono renew your allocation to us from Coramunitv Development Block Grant funds. We ask you for $1,500 this year - the same amount as last year. We thank you again for your generous support in the past several years -- you are a key reason for the accomplishments KeCAN had in 1995! WeCAN is a community-based human service organization, dedicated to helping people achieve greater self- sufficiency and family stability. WeCAN provides a variety of services to low—income residents in western Hennepin County. WeCAN served 1,257 families in 1995. This includes 28 households in Oronoi Seven Orono families received Emergency Assistance of $1,340. Six Orono households received 416 Meals On Wheels. Ten Orono residents received Job Placement and Development Services. Four Orono households received Public Assistance Iir*'ake Services. One Orono household received 10 hours of mental health counseling. I am looking forward to attending your March 11 public hearing to share more information about our services and our organization. If you have any c- -stions or concerns at any time, please feel free call roe at 472-0742. iniMi WrCAN SHUVICKSEMERGENCYEMERGENCYMEALS ON NUMBER or ruouAMSMTANCEASSISTANCEWHEELSMEALSNUTRIIIONHOUSEHOLDSt ISSUED 10USEHOLDS DELIVERED lOUSEIiOLDS GREENFIELD 1 $ 200.03 independence 1 $ 250.00 4 405 LOREHO 1 $ 350 00 MAPt£PLMN 14 $ 4.111.00 12 2.270 1 MTKA.BEACH MMNETRISTA.4 $ 1,399.00 5 297 2 MOUND 70 $ 19,463.00 42 5.090 20 ORONO 7 1 1.340.00 6 446 ROCKFORD 23 $ 7,200.00 SPRING PARK 23 $ 5.657.00 26 2,923 1 ST. BONIFACIUE 17 $ 3,943.00 2 7 TONKA BAY 4 $ 1,060.00 OTHER CITIES ANNANOALE ANOKA 1 BRKLYN.CNTR.1 BUFFALO CHANHASSEN 1 CHASKA COKATO CRYSTAL 1 DELANO EAGAN EXCELSIOR HAMEL HOMELESS 2 I 9300 HOPKINS 3 LONG LAKE MAPLE GROVE MEDINA MINNEAPOLIS MINNETONKA PLYMOUTH RICHFIELD SHOREWOOO 7 WATERTOWN WAVERLY $ 200.00 WAYZATA TOTALS 17Ct $ 44,246.00 91 12.154 3: ___^. JOOS A TRAINING HOUSEHOLDS 2 5 62 10 9 15 3 2 FAMILY PUHLIC COUNSELINO COUNSELING TOfALSUPI’ORI ASSISI ANCE lOUSCIIOLDS HOURS NUMBER orSERVICESHOUSEHOLDSHOUSEHOLDS3 1 0 i 3 2 5 1 20 42 4 20 26 06 15 137.5 329 4 1 10 20 11 43 3 9 1 16 70 0 2 4 20 30 1 7 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 3 4 \2 0 1 4 2 2__________ )27 1 4 2 2 1 2 11 1 5<1 ii;1 2:1 206.6 002 **INFORMAIION A REFERRALS 670 ITOTAL 1,267 Westonka Community Action NetworkRevenue and Expenses Suburban Allianct t3% Hannapin County 10% Program Sarvtc iFitfal Othar Incoma 2% ContiibuUons 12% rood nncJ Nulflllon 5% Housing 1% cpna 0% M«nls on Wh«0l8 23% — rinnclal Counseling 2% Emargancy Asslstanca 31% •4^SUipdai lUig'ServIcos 2% Grants 37% Human Services 0% program Development IX Jobs Program 20% Revenue Functional Expenses ia1 I 1 II 1 WESTONKA COMMUNITY ACIION NEIWOUK,PiC. •TATEMENIS OF SUPPORT. REVENUE. EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEARS ENDED MAY 31. ItSS AND 1994 199S Operating Fund_ Rfftilcted Fund Plan! Fund PuMOMippOft BObuitaiABsnei TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT $ 30.459 08.120 34.098 mm _ Oovtrnmenl Qrsnts CommunHif D#vtopmiiil BtodiQcanli Hunepln County Coniftds HeMuTMintnlt TOTAL GOVERNMENT GRANTS OtfMrrwwHM Pfogrsm tervlM feet Membenhip duet Efnergency ettitlenoe loen rtpeymerOt Interest hoome Other Income TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT. GOVERNMENT GRANTS AND OTHER REVENUE Expentet Progrem tervloet Emergency ettlitance dob't Progrsm Flnendal oounteing * Food end NuIrlUofi Housing Meelt-onwheeti Human tervlces Developing new programs 61.051 4.738 11.023 1.695 49.979 12.713 1.795 TOTAL PROGRAM SERVICES Supporting tervlces MenegemenI end general 209.991 3.496 TOTAL EXPENSES 213.487 S2.52I 2.52 7 See noles to finarKlal 8f.ilemenl» .3 Operating Fund_ $ 32,491 27.81 3 60.304 17.050 24.621 25.662 25,000 466 42.612 53.620 31.625 2.910 2.785 1.360 2.406 189 1235 113 370 1.363 58.404 215 , 38.512 264.313 23§148.925 60.S97 63.651 9.023 7.623 3.641 42.450 14.562 10.922 151.878 2.912 154.790 Reslilclad Fund $530 U9 Ufi 111 Tolals 1995 1994 8 30.459 98.120 $32,491 ,31551 163.237 M3Si 17,050 24.821 25.502 25.000 _4M 42.612 MJW 63.620 31,825 2.910 2.785 1,360 2.408 424 843 379 1.383 58.899 39.041 254.548 149J5S 66.997 61.051 83.851 4.738 9.023 11.023 7.823 1.69S 3.641 49.979 42.450 12.713 14.502 1.795 10.922 209.991 151.876 >1.399 _JA?3 4.3 U 1,399 216.014 I I I I 1 1 1 I WESIONKACOMMUNITY ACTION NEIWOHK. INC. STATEMENTS OF SUPPORT, REVENUE, EXPENSES AND CHANGES M FUND BALANCES YEARS ENDED MAY 31,1995 AND 1994 1995 1994 Operating Fund Restricted Fund .Plant Fund Oparallng Fund Restricted Plant Totals Fund Fund 1995 1994 PUBLIC SUPPORT, GOVERNMENT GRANTS AND OTHER REVENUE OVER (UNDER)EXPENSES »5O.02O 1 235 S (2.527)$(5.CG5)$ 530 1(1.399)9 46.534 1(6.734) CliangM In hmd bMancM UnmUlded gHto and baquaatt AddMona to praparty Proparty Vanafar bahvaan plant tond and oparallng Sind (13.216) 13,218 600 • 800 EUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OP YEAR 69.715 25.955 _M22 55.610 25JJ5 Lon 60.323 86.257 FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR $99,35:)$14,313 $50,745 17S-950 f 3,62^;$128,957 MO.323 See noic9 lo finnnclal statciiicnta. WE':TONKA COMMUNITY ACTION NETWOflK, INC, TATEMEMTOF FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES YEAR ENDED MAY 31,1995 Program Scrv|ces^ Emergency Assistance Jobs Program rtnanclaf Counseling Food and Nutrltlori IJpusInfl Mcals-on Wliecis Human Services DevelopingNew Programs Total Supporting Services SsMss Employes benefits Peyrol taxes Unemployment compensation Staff travel end parking Total satarfes and related expenses Office rent Office phone InsuraiKe Equipment end repair Printing end pubScaUons Publicity end outreach MsMng Supplies Trsining MIscenansoos Profassloiwl faas Direct eld to Indivlduati Housing Umitlas Other Total expenses before depredation $14,126 $ 0.475 $2,354 $3,767 1.274 765 212 340 1.040 625 174 278 54 32 9 14 39Q 231 65 104 18.881 19.131 23H jLm 1,320 792 220 352 1.260 761 211 330 291 174 48 78 231 1.739 30 47 253 194 42 67 2.246 1.965 374 599 934 600 156 249 740 1.228 109 932 113 68 19 30 64 50 11 17 1.228 43.269 204 1.935 26.072 IO.r.15 4.54Q Am 66,997 61.051 4,730 11.023 942 85 69 4 26 7.533 680 555 29 208 7.063 637 520 27 195 942 85 69 4 % 45.202 4.07B 3.330 173 1.248 $1,883 170 139 7 1J26 9.005 8J42 1125 54.031 2.251 88 85 19 12 17 160 62 44 7 01 704 677 153 95 135 1.190 628 2.457 05 84 051 660 634 145 89 128 1,123 407 327 57 32 611 88 84 19 12 17 150 62 44 8 4 81 4.224 4.050 929 2.255 051 7.005 3.136 6.881 307 266 40.058 170 169 39 24 34 299 124 87 15 115 163 _100 26.072 10,615 41.22JI 1.695 49.979 12.713 1.795 209,091 3.496 Depredation of oMce equipment 2.521 Total 1995 I 47.005 4,246 3,460 180 1.300 56.282 4,400 4,227 068 2,279 865 8,104 3,262 6,908 402 301 48,221 28,072 10,815 4U21 213.487 15HL Total expo^'es SG6.997 301,051 S4.738 $11.023 J1X95 $49,979 $12.713 <1.705 $209,99^ $2,022 <212i£14 See notes lo nnanclal sinlompnis 5- ^ • * ii’ " ** 0» ^ytJaceli 5nt At 4--00 pm jau aa4 jour fomtlj will be welcomf4. At ^/Mrvicw CoveoAAt C<>- H fri«^« of ,5090 ^11 ;jleAervAtioA ^5ocleCj. There will be opcobers %vho will eivc short ao4 ioformAtive/ as well as iotercstio^ tslfcs on topics such as the historj of ',^090 Jgiir to the present 4 a9 foets of %vhAt is hoppeniii9 there. ^ 4iooer of homemA4e ^Wli. combreA4 an4 Apple pie ivill be serve4 At ^:00/ with time to socislixe ao4 jet to know jour neijhbors. ^hiUcAre will be provi4e4 for those who wish to use it from 4.*00 - 5-00 / Allowin9 ehil4ren to join us for dinner. TWs is not onij a 9rcAt opportunitj for jou to know more about ,5090 ^ill ^^eservAtioO/ but also a chance for jou to jet to know jour neijhbors. T® make jour reservation for this fun, food , fact and eveninj, please call with a number of those from jour fomilj who %vill be Attendinj. ««■ OtJorie /Peterson at: 47Z-5954. 'Kou are welcome to leave jour resert^tion on our recorder, if jou are not able to reach us in person. £t2\. .^tronj fbijj water ^Vl^innesoto Reside water ‘T^innetrista 0 .Dakota ^hief ^y^innehoha s5«9<**^ ^l^aplc FEB ? ^hanhassen £. ^aujhinj water ^hakopee ^rooked water O^innekahda Q. ^and of skj tinted water O^innetonka /Rnes, iQod of the ^JV orth' this sheet and check jour answers at our jet-cojether. i0ope to see jou there.’ ,^riends of .^aja ^ill /Reservation ^ocietj