The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-23-1997 Board of Review PacketAGENDA FOR 1997 BOARD OF REVIEW WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23,1997,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA ROLL CALL APPEALS - Appeals will be heard in the order persons arrive and sign in at the Council Chambers When property owner's name is called please approach the Board and give the following information: Name Address of property (Mailing address if different) The property identification number (PID number of the property being appealed) Value of property on 1997 Notice of Valuation Value you believe is appropriate and why ADJOURNMENT I • .jnvT^i. - >.-r< 'mfff Ultll 1 II \w^r ii i ■^ u I RgCSWSO k?R 'i ' r\ ‘V,*' • r.«r onOMO 0 y ^h</9%. (pxp. oc/x (^ (jie^ G^S3S 'C^^^m.*2£3ii a;:t^/SrS' J)jl. ^2<h Si!^ di-AU^vif xxiy^ ^ S5XX wZpdr sjX^<^^<yCo%At/y^T’zarZZ^. sy^3f DOUGLAS JOHNSON 4194 CENTERBOARD LANE STUART. FL 34997 ...^k..,.^.^ ^a..«.^Y«... ka-.li —■--- ■■ .- ■ .— ■*»-.^.-».-o.»f ^.»...»-rta--.a -^kk.»»-.»..-—-».»n4i-.-.v.«-.-»j.St^-r»gig.'^J CITY ASSlSSUX 2750 KcLL£Y PARKWAY ORONO MN 55356 HC 807(11/50) PRESORTto I IMS I-CLASS MAIL U S POSTAGE PAID f/PLS. MN n.HMlT NO. 327.. HENNEPIN COUNTY REAL ESTATE VALUATION NOTICE 1997 VALUE FOi» TAXES PAYABLE IN 1998 SEE nevense SIDE ihCnMOOTioNAL information “• MUNICIPALITY ORONO PROPERTY ID 02-117-23 34 0012 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION RESIOtNTIAL NUNHOMcSTEAD TO APPEAL YOUR VALUATION OR CLASSIFICATION First, road the back of this notice! Step 1: To ciiscjss youc V;ilua!lon Notice with an Assessor, cat* the number listo'J bolow wiltun the rioxl five (5) days. ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE 960»000 LIMITED MARKET VALUE 775^300 QUALIFYING VALUE FOR IMPROVEMENTS MARKET VALUE FOR TAXATION 775^300 1 473^1844 Stop 2: Local Board of Review: You sonrj:»tg a letter or if'proscn:a*ivo to appointment fT^ay rx* neecssaTv. slay appeal by appearing In person or the board Call your assessor; an VALUE FOR NEW IMPROVEMENTS APR 23t 1997 AT 7:Q0 PM AT ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS Step 3: The County Board of Equalization: Vnu mist appeal lo the i or<il Board Rev ow to be eligible to appeal to the Couniv Hoard of Fqjrili/i lion Infoaraiion on Hennepin County’s Board of I rjun!:/atM *p '. on the k of ifii.s noiicc DOUGLAS 0 JUH.NSON 4194 CENTER BOARD LA S STUART FL 34997 6176 ,,|l,.|,,||,|,,|,|,,|,„||„l,Velulinlill"M(IIImli.llil.lMiliiiiliill r 1 RECEIVED APR 2 1 1997 CITY Or C« iwi\0 i April 21, 1997 City Assessor 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re; Hennepin County Real Estate valuation notice for taxes payable in 1998. ID 07-117-23 12 0016. Dear Sir: We recently received an estimated market valuation of $260,000. In 1997 we payed taxes on a valuation of $245,000. We wish to protest this increase based on the fact that conditions have not changed in the structure of our home, and also that the city storm sewer on our property (built without a permit) has caused us hardship (ie. accumulated silt from the storm sewer has caused flooding in our yard). In 1996 we received a reduction based on this hardship. Because this situation still exists, we believe that our valuation should remain at $245,000. eorge and Katherxne Kalwext cc: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour A Cli COMMI RCIAI, R i al Es i am : Groi k Inc . INSlirt IinSAl SIRMdS A CB I l( I VM I) Rl \l I STMI HRnKI R COMMERCIAL ifetivering SotutionK Through Local Knowledge Worldwide HR’Nhl I) 1906 April 21, 1997 M vithkw N. N h cim . SI MOR Vin |»KI SUM ST MINNI SOT A Rl (ilONAl M AN Mil K Local Board of Review Orono C ity Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 612 <i:4-4h<NI 6i: SM ,S0:.A I \\ RE: 160 Smith A venue , Wayzata , Minnesota 55391-9511 Property ID Number : 02-117-23-21-0029 To whom it may concern: With the recent increase in the estimated market value for the above referenced property to $472,000.00, there is reason to believe this property is overvalued. 1 have retained an appraiser, Paul Loftgren, to perform a private home appraisal. If his appraisal confirms over valuation, then 1 plan on appealing to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization. It would be preferable to try and handle this at the local level, but unfortunately, the appraisal will not be completed by April 23. 1 will be out of town April 23, and will therefore be unable to attend the hearing. Unless I hear differently, 1 will assume this letter will be sufficient to keep my case open. Please give me a call if 1 need to be doing anything else. V, Senior Vice President Minnesota Regional Manager MNN/pt \ .i«/M;»riN»rv4V« I ,"»w \r/ «ifT> 2 2 19^/ (90 In ai I iA.se li WITH Diy and C.Y. Li rNo r Si RVTsct C liim s Aroi si> tmi C iI om- 77NI I k \S( I WISII Sul III Sun 770MISSI \pni is. Missi sui \ .S54.L^*52H2 j hPP-23-1997 12:37 TIMH 8 ASSOCIATES INC.SI2 932 9787 P.Ol i STEPHEN P. MOSELEY 1635 Bohns Point Road Wayzata,MN 55391 April 23, 1997 To: Orono City Council Board of Review BECEWEO art OF OBONO Fronv Stephen Moseley Subject; Hennepin County Real Estate Valuation Notion payable in 1998 Property; 1635 Bohns Point Road, PED// 17-117-23-0006 Gentlemen; I do not have all the pertinatc information collected at this lime in order to properly appeal my new property tax assessment payable in 1998 I wish to reserve iny rijjht to appeal my estimated market value at a later meeting of the Local Board of Review or to the County Beard of Equalization. Sincerely, Stephen P. M^elcy 1 / TOTAL P.Ol LINDQUIST & VENNUM p u l p. 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eiomtm Street Minnearous , Minnesota 55402*2205 Telephone 612*371*3211 Fax ;612*371*3207 In D enver UNOOUST. VENNUM & CHRtSTEf«EN P.L.UR. 600 17tm Street , Suite 2125 D enver . Colorado 80202*5401 Telephone : 303-573*5900 A ttorneys A t Law Donald C. Swenson (612)371-3223 dswenson(g!indquistcom April 22, 1997 City Assessor and Local Board of Review Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RECEIVED APR 2 3 1997 CITY OF ORONO Re: 80 Luce Line Ridge Property ID U 31-118-23340010 Dear Assessor and Local Board of Review . I am absolutely astounded that this appeal is necessary and that it was also necessary for me to appeal last year’s valuation to the Minnesota Ta.\ Court If you read the definition of “Estimated Market Value,” it provides the market value shall be the “most probable price that a well-informed buyer would pay a well-informed seller without either party being forced to buy or sell.. . This is what the property would likely sell for ...” In November of 1996 I purchased the above property for $305,000. The property had been on the market for I believe nine months or more and in October there were 5 or 6 interested parties. A bidding war ensued and I acquired the property at the highest price I would have paid for the property. Other bidders’ oflers were in the mid-to-high $200s $305,000 was the price the property sold for and you are bound by the legal definition of “Estimated Market Value.” Assessors use formulas which in this case were flawed The market determines true value and in this case it was my purchase price. If other properties are valued at 90% of market, my property should have a value for tax purposes of approximately $275,000. I am out of town on business this week, but if you have any questions leave a phone mail message at my office (371-3223) and 1 will return your call. truly yours, Donald C. Swenson DCS:gih EDO 1:912059 1 April 15. 1997 RECEIVED APR 1 7 1997 . • V wHONO1 ocal Board of Re\ iew Mayor - City of Orono P.d. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55343 Rc: Property ID: 05-117-23 43 0002 - (865 Partenwood Road) 1 would like to appeal my 1997 value for taxes payable in 1998. The key reason is the difficulty (and reduced price) a number of people on my street, in my block have had selling their homes o\er the past few^ years. 1 suspect this difficulty has to do with the fact that the lots are virtually unbuildable or expandable without a variance due to hardcover zoning restrictions. Although it has been possible, historically, to get limited variance relief, there is no assurance, to a buyer, as to the future availability of variances. In addition, there are significant lead times associated with such variances. Virtually my entire lot is within 75 feet of the lake, in which, there is a no-more- than-zero hardcover requirement. My next door neighbor at 815 Partenwood has been trying to sell their house for over a year. They started at o\ er $800,000 and have gotten no takers for the past four months at the current price of $500,000. fheir frontage and square footage are comparable. 1 understand that 900 Partenwood .sold within the past year for $657,000 and is comparable. 1 am aware that the property at 850 Partenwood sold at a price substantially below its asking price about three years ago. I know that there have been other Partenwood transactions, but am not aware of the details. I do not believe that other transactions that have occurred with area hi>uses or lots not as severely restricted as mine should be used as comparables for assessmetit purposes, particularly since there are \ery good comparables on my block. An appropriate discount for restricted buildability should be established and applied permanently to m\ property. I would propose that a $610,000 market value (93% of the 900 Partenwood value of $657,000) be applied as my 1997 Estimated Market Value instead of $762,000 as proposed. This represents an approximate 20°/o discount which i would like to document as an appropriate discount lor this and future assessments. Sincerely, R. 1 hint Greene 865 Partenwood Road Long Lake. MN 55356 612/904-5701 (W) Page.( ___. HOAim oi- ur.viKw Mr.r.tinc SIGN-IN SIIEKT 4-Z?>, 199 NAME STREET & ZIP CODE PHONE 1 PID#APPT. 1 /L-Zo 5Sa<)y-^.'cv'//[7 ^ - 7/7 * ji7 j:/ “/52 p7;^ 2 ScoMr ^Inek'-el^/ "^45 4/ 0/T 3 r" 1 ^ ^0 A rl^••< 4 IV Y /St-1,1 1 \>SK.' • £c-c Ji'i <x(Til/^ZC VwV C*M - U ~i-^3 \ 2. i• COl 0 6 /^is^ /fZ.^/^ /c^/'itf tW/;^ j:5 ^ Ot5 Ca>AfVxWV •tAAj>fv.«lAST~ '^LVl 6.\A\KS/5ftgAi#4^S 2A'v 'ix ft.4-Tl-O'olb 2.C'<n'^3 -43 cV‘if4 8 A^\) C- L*c^ Vy\C’J t>w'>^76-A } -ll9 'j 3 wa-tt'v'f 9 j Z.^:) A/Zj>aC A 75;10 - \ ^T?—"^hoo tX 10 /?7c^l/A'lO- 1/7 '^/-9 11 ^7ni'y?7-7_//-7-7? )/CLir 12 /llci ^-f-zn 74'C' /-/s^n~t r An J?j,l^y'^".>y/9 'M-HX-2'^ hOcj/c 13 *>? \^^71'3/ «ws< 14 ^ / 15 • 16 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • • 24 • 25 CITY OP OnONO AMttSMENT MOTICE 4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Review of the City of OrofK) ini Hennepin County. Minnesota, win meet at thi Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, in said city at 7:00 o’clock p.m. on Wednesday^ the 23id day of ApnI. 1997. for the purpose of reviewing and correctir>g the assessment of said aty for the year 1997. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessmerrt or who wish to complain that the property of another ts assessed loo low. are henS>y notified to appear at said meeting and shw cause for having such assessment corrected. • No complaint that another persop m assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shaff have been notified of such complaint. Dated this 7th day of April, 1997 Dorothy M. Hallin atyCterk (Published in The Laker and Ploheer April 12.1997) Affidavit of Publication Stale of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable lav/s, as amended. B.) Tfie printed //'My Of! (KUlU /JlQ f' d /.which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks: It was first published Monday, the day of.Inxtc.Viii and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday, Subscribed and sworn to me on this ' STlHOtM NC '«^9UC-aMNMfifA ^ale (niormation i (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $12.20 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $12.20. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: S7.00 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5.05. CITY OF ORONO ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Review of the City of Orono in I lenncpin County. Minnesota, will meet at the Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, in said city at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on Wednesday, the 23rd day of April. 1997, for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said city for the year 1997, All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting and show cause for having such assessment corrected. No complaint that anotlier person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Dated this 7th day of April, 1997. /s/ Dorothy M. Hallin Citv Clerk Posted at: Citv Hall 9 Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office Crystal Bay Po.st Office CITY OF ORONO ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Review oflhe City of Orono in Hennepin County. Minnesota, will meet at the Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, in said city at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on Wednesday, the 23rd day of April, 1997, for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said city for the year 1997. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting and show cause for having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Dated this 7th day of April. 1997. /s/ Dorothv M. llallin Citv Clerk Publish in the Laker/Pioncer newspaper the week of April 12. 1997. CITYof ORONO TELECOPY COVER LETTER Please deliver the following page(s) to: Name: From: Total number of pages letter.including this cover Date:V- 9 7 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL OS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Phone: (612) 473-7358 and ask for:&^cn4i Our telecopy number is: (612) 473-0510 Additional Message: L / A 9 7 Form No. A. F. 4 — Notice to ClerK of Meeting of Board of Review — *Equalization. OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR^‘^^'''^° FEB 71997 CITY OF ORONO TO THE CLERK OF THE City Orono Hennepin COUNTY. MINNESOTA: day of AprilNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN. That the Twenty-Third at —Seven--------------o’clock____E:___M.. has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Review— 1 • • (Sinht 00! One) Equalization —in your___kiiz______for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.03. you are required to give notice of said meeting by publication and posting, not later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting. Given under my hand this Fi f th day of February .I9il County Assessor Hennepin County. Minnesota Applies only to Cities virtiose charier provides for a Board of Equalization instea'^ of a Board of Review. Clerk’s Notice to Post and Publish — HC 1163 ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the Board of Review of the _________________________________in____ will meet at the office of the_ at_______^o’clock___M., on .County, Minn. .Qerk, in said , the day of ,19. for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said. for the year 19 . All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting and show cause for having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of sudi complaint. Dated this.day of.. 19 Clerk of the.jof. .ii" s Memo DATE: TO: FROM: January 7,1997 Dorothy M. Hallin, Orono City Clerk Thomas May, Hennepin County Assessor SUBJECT: 1997 Local Board of Review Dates JAN 8 199T Wednesday Day of the Week April 23. 1997 Date Minnesota Law requires that I, as County Assessor, set the date for your Local Board of Review Meeting. After reviewing previous meeting days and your suggestions of last year, the above date was selected. I sincerely hope that it is agreeable with your council. As there must be a quorum, 1 would suggest that an informal review of your members with a request that they mark their calendars would be appropriate. Please confirm the date set out or call Bill EfFertz at 348-3046 with your alternative date by January 21, so that our printing order can be completed on time. We suggest starting times of 6:30, 7:00, or 7:30 p.m., but will discuss it with you if you wish a different time. Vour early completion and return of the attached tear off strip will be appreciated and we will send your official notice for posting as required by law. Please return to JoDee Nelson, A-2 103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 CONFIRMATION OronoMunicipality: ______ Date: Wednesday, April 23 Time: Place: 7«nn p Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway Confirmed by For selecting meeting dates in future years, the following Tnation will be helpful STATE OF MINNESOTA County of Hennepin City of Orono HC 211 (p.l) We, the undersigned. Board of Review - ‘Equalization - of the certify that we, and each of us, attended at the office of the___ of April___________ City Orono Orono Clerk on the _________ In said County, do hereby Twenty-Third _______________day , 19 _97 . The day set forth In the notice given by the Clerk, and In accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 274.01. We made changes in hie 19 97 Assessment as entered In the following form(s). Witness our hands this___________day of___________________,19. (Chair) CHANGES MADE BY THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW ‘Applies only to Cities '^ose Charters provide for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review. Name of Property Owner Property 10 Number (Pott In PID Order ) Hmatd (Y-Yet) (N-No) Prop. Type (R.FF.C) Clast of Property (X) Increase In Market Value (») Decrease in Market Value (») Estimated Total Market Value li) ■ ‘ *•**■ *• • ■ •' *'* ’ " Y:'Y-;Y jyYr Remilfka r ■it;':: . ,‘e (Land) (Bldg)Ag Other /W oA^L^u) Micdf /so1rA^4•Oy R ><A/o OH'Wl-2'h-ll' 0010 y ><ZOO ‘fIZ 000 90000 3^2-000 0S-II7-Z3-43-0OOZ Y RL X A/<3 h'aluuo't +01-\l7-ZZ'\Z-'OO/C>Y RL A/o Lawv-«uce i-Awi<iV,a»AS 07-H7--2.3-32,-DoC,o Y RL X A/o CV) avvok ?>U^,Wc\s ^37-/(7-23-41- 009^.Y l?L X 1 A/o CVtan<Hex S'i'^ pUelA e VA TO iO-Wl'lZ-SI-bOZ^Y ?s ><A/o C/V)avi<442.-----------f--------- ^Aci\r rC 1—ovv 4" ^IO-\n-23*3l-Oo2-9 Y R Y vJ M O a LA^ p . T^i—\—10*117-23-31 -0OJ5 y R X A 0 Q-U Cv ?U't V\p Vc e V 10117-2 3-31'0050 Y K lSC?oo 3SOOO .............. n J 3^000 Gi ooo # 1 M I V /777 T N-A.CC/A- /.3 ooo Toh/A vw ft ^-V zyHbo S^eoVieiA 7-II7-23-II- OooC,X hi O Ct>(3LlA^ &. «_J C v*\ c_ W 5 c- VA I7-H7-23-2I- 00 2.1 Y RL X AJ O C'\a <2- A)tf 11 (3le<i i7-117-13 -ji- ooi5 y Alfa T)<xvv Cs. \W\ Vw V 20*117'13-¥> 004^1 ><:A) 0 C, IrtavA^ e- P 1 /"/ A Its oJ VA 21-117-2 3-2.3-ccsu Y X AJ O V 1 O ^ ^27-//S-23-41-00O7 Y X a / 0 C^<Xw(^ €... AAotA'vyv .7HlS-23-\l-60'o V iisoo 3S ‘CS(^o V/ 69^0 o Z97 ooo -CHANGES MADE BY THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW HC 211 (p.2) ‘Applies only to Cities whose Charters provide for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review. Name of Property Owner W-f- ' ■ Property ID Number (Pott In PIO Order ) Hmstd (Y-Yes) (N-No) Prop. Type R.FF.C) Class of Property (X) increase In Market Value (S) Decrease In Market Value (5) Estimated Total Market Value ($)a:-■' ■■ ; Y. ■.■^¥:-101Ag Other (Land) (Bldg) V A 5*O Va 3I-|I3-2.?-3V-Ooic>r a] 0 di\a»/>.Oic, . ji*2- a“\"U aJoV-^C>Vn OZ-l/7'2.3-3 ‘/-OD6g A/><A/O ^dA.V^'Vz. TToVwa. 50 V'>C7-l(7-23-||-Ooe.?gL X a) 0 6 U Q. CxfDLVr vi V"o.Va\ e yj 10-1(7'Zi-3t-0031 r X .AI O C-U G. \ ^\a.C/4C - 003 l V 1 RL /c aJ t? TV v*o u o u c e^v/20*117-2.3-23-002.0 Y A a) c> C U Q /*.- * --------------------------- C-J O V\V*. C 1 oe 73-117-13-37- 00 U \y 1 liL X yd ^ rt ^J • •