Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-27-1997 Council Packetr L AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 27,1997,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL COUNCIIIEETINQ 1. OATH OF OFFICE Corey Famiok, Police Officer JAN 2 7 1997 2. CONSENT AGENDA CITY OF ORONO APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of January 13, 1997 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Charles Schroeder Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 4. #2195 Genmar Industries. 1449 Shoreline Drive > Commercial Site Plan/Variances - Resolution 5. #2196 Genmar Industries, 1449 Shoreline t>r.ve - Land Alteration CUPA^ariances - Denial Recommendation 6. #2200 William Ellis, 2435 North Shore Drive - Variances - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT ^ 7. Pay Request #2 Kelley - Avenue Sanitary Sewer F9 8. Pay Request #7 Final - Brown Road Reconstruction CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 9. /\ppointment to Council Vacancy - Resolution 10. Park Commission Vacancies /11. Dan Handlin. 3860 North Shore Drive - Tax Forfeit Property Assessment Waiver - Reso dtion 12. Orono Ice Arena, Inc. Payment of Sewer and Water Connection Charges 13. Termination of Suburban Alliance Joint Powers Agreen.ent - Resolution ^14. Bid Awards 1997 Public Ser\ ices Department Truck Replacements ^15. Donation to Police Department CITY ATTORNF i S REPORT (*16) LICENSES (*17) BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 27,1997,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS <» 01/27 01/30 02/03 02/10 02/17 02/18 02/24 Council meeting 7:00 p.m. Council work Session 8:00 a.m. Park Commission 7:15 p.m. Council meeting 7:00 p.m. HOLIDAY - Presidents Day Obser\'ed Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. TUESDAY Council meeting 7:00 p.m. 1 i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 13, 1997 £ 7 1007 ROLL CITY OF ORONO The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Elect Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson and JoEllen Hurr. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Radio, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Public Ser\ ices Director Greg Gappa, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Building and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7.00 p.m. (#1) OATH OF OFFICE MAYOR GABRIEL JABBOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS CHARLES KELLEY AND BARBARA PETERSON City Administrator administered the oath of office to Gabriel Jabbour as Mayor and Charles Kelley and Barbara Peterson as Council Members Mayor Callahan turned the meeting over to Mayor Jabbour. Congratulations were extended to the new Council. (H2) RESOLUTION #3827 - RECOGNITION OF MAYOR EDWARD J. CALLAHAN, JR.’S SERVICE TO THE CUT Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #3827 recognizing Edward J. ^ Callahan, Jr. for distinguished service and outstanding leadership as Mayor and City Council Member. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour recognized Mayor Callahan for his years of committed service to the City of Orono as well as presented him with a plaque. Appreciation was also extended to Mrs. Callahan. (#3) RESOLUTION #3828 - APPRECL iTION FOR COUNCIL MEMBER JOELLEN HURK'S SERVICE TO THE CITY Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #3828 in appreciation to JoEllen Ilurr for distinguished service as City Council Member. Vole; Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour recognized JoEllen Hurr for her years of service to the City and presented her with a plaque. I'i i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 (*#4) CONSENT AGENDA Items #10, 11, and 12 were added to the Consent Agenda. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#5) REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 1996 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of December 9, 1996. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:15 - 8:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing w ere noted. (#6) PROPOSED SEWER PROJECTS - NORTH LONG LAKE Cook presented an overall summary of the project and the results of the feasibility study. The improvement project will e.xtend the sewer to the North Long Lake area as well as the Country Club Addition from the existing sewer off of Brown Road. .A lift station will be located at the corner of Long Lake Boulevard with flow by gravity to the lift station from Dakota Avenue and East of Long Lake Boulevard Some homes will require grinder pump stations placed on the lake side of their homes. Once the sewer has been installed, the street will be restored and boulevard resodded. The Dakota Avenue section is open to surfacing with blacktop. Cook reported that some easements will be required to provide serv'ice to serve several lots and for lift stations The project will also require some temporar)’ easements where tight corridors are present. The lift station will pump the sewage out Long L.ake Boulevard to CoRd 6 and down to the Country Club Addition. The Country Club Addition will be served totally by gravity to the lift station on the south end of the subdivision and pumped out along Country Club Road and Brown Road to the existing manhole. Cook reported that an alternate force main was reviewed to the south across private prope.ly, which would require an easement, to West Farm Road and also by the marsh area. This would result in a savings of approximately $30,000, but because of the need to go through the marsh area, there is concern with pollution and access difficulties. The installation could take place b> direct boring but repair would be difficult. This alternate is not being recommended Cook noted three homes along the east side of Brown Road i.:e not included in the project H MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 i#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Cook reviewed the costs of the project. The lateral facilities including street repair are estimated at $616,114, and the trunk facilities at $414,157 to include the force main. With 55 units in the area, this would result in an $18,730 charge per unit. The Dakota Avenue ..urfacing at an estimated $18,284 would result in a $1930 per unit charge for those along Dakota Avenue, or an additional $350 if all 55 units were factored in. Goetten asked if the costs were figured on last years’ dollars, what increase might be shown for the project this year. Coc k w as of the opinion that the cost was within the estimate at +/-5%. The meeting was opened to public comments. John Gawron, 920 Dakota Avenue, asked if the City would take over maintenance (repair, plowing) of Dakota Avenue once it is resurfaced. Dakota Avenue is a private road and currently gravel. Kelley was of the opinion that the City maintains roads with sewer but said it was in question. Jabbour noted the need to distinguish between rural and urban roadways which would affect the answei to this question Moorse reported the City was now beginning to bring sewer to rural areas. No change to the policy regarding maintenance has occurred but could be considered by the Council. Goetten informed Gawron that the Council w'ould need more background information before any determination could be made. Tom Steinke, 910 Dakota Avenue, asked if manhole covers would be required once the sewer is in. Cook reported that manholes would be installed. Mr. Gawron informed the Council that he did not wish to pay $2,000 towards blacktopping Dakota Avenue. M.'s. Gawron commented that the road was not properly bedded. Cook informed them that the road's gravel base w'ould be put back in propei form. Jabbour asked if it is the recommendation that Dakota Avenue become blacktop. Cook reported that it was, however, the ultimate decision to pay for the blacktop rests with the property owners. He noted that the cost of maintenance is lower with a blacktopped road. Goetten asked what was involved in resurfacing a road. Cook said the road is lowered about 6". Below that, the road is cut down another 15-1/2" for the crushed rock base. 3" of bituminous is laid over the base resulting in a 7-ton road capacity Cook reported that a gravel road cannot handle 7-tons which is desired for the long term. The life of a bituminous road is 20 years. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 (#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Keith Gasner, 884 Dakota Avenue, questioned the S350 per unit charge. He noted the neighboring area would gain a blacktopped road and the cost is spread amongst all residents in the project, but those along Dakota Avenue would have to pay separately for the blacktopping of Dakota Avenue without the cost spread amongst all involved in the l)roject. He questioned whether there would be a credit for the residents along Dakota iUenue. Goetten informed him that the $1950 charge is for those along Dakota Avenue, who would not receive any credit. She did note that if the cost was spread amongst all of those in the project, it would cost $350. Don Lund, 1465 Long Lake Boulevard, asked who makes the ultimate decision on what properties are included in the project. Cook informed him the Council makes that determination Lund asked what rules were being followed noting the properties north, south, and east of him were not included, yet he was included Jabbour informed him that "hot spots" for sewering w ere identified by the City where existing septic systems were substandard, having primary and secondary' septic sites with problems. He noted lot sizes and developments were reviewed and a determination made through public meetings for the limited number of sewer units available. Jabbour informed Lund that the procedure to gain permission from the Met Council for the sewer units was over a long time period. Lund questioned whether the size of the lot was a factor noting he had 2- 1/2 acres GalTron reported that Lund’s property was included as sewer was projected to serve properties on the same street as Lund He did note Lund's property is larger than most and has a steeper topography Gaflron said Stall* has not closely reviewed each property and can further review it regarding whether or not to include it if requested. Kelley informed Lund that if he had the opportunity to hook up to sewer he would do'so immediately. He noted the advantages of sewering, the cost of mound systems, system failure, and new regulations on septic systems. Lund asked if the cost of sewering was based on so much per foot. Jabbour informed Lund that if Staff finds it unnecessary to include his property, he may opt out. Lund said he had not made that decision Gafl'ron reported that criteria has not yet been set for the project as it has in the past in regards to fringe properties. Jabbour explained that the project did not become a reality until the end of 1996 and was only speculation up to that point. He noted the septic rules established in 1978 and 1992 which laid out shoreland regulations. Jabbour said there were probably 600 properties in Orono who would not pass septic inspections at this time. He noted 25% of the systems are inspected yearly. The City also had a 2-year moratorium on requiring septic repairs Jabbour said the State legislature is reviewing cost and ell'ecl of the regulations He also informed Lund that whenever a property has septic, the residence is limited to the number of bedrooms allowed. With sewering, the property has more options for expansion. 1i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 (#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Lund inquired what the monthly payment will be for the sewer assessment. Jabbour noted that the City has a good credit rating which will be reflected in the payment. Gaffron informed Lund that the payment would be affected by how much the City determines to contribute to the project. An e.xample of $ 15,000 over 15 years was ^ven with principal payment of $1,000 a year, interest of 6-7% of another $1,000. The $2,000 figure per year would result in a monthly payment between $150 and $200. There is also a quarterly sewer charge of $72. Lund aLf asked if the plan is to run the sewer down the center of the road or the side. Cook said they will attempt to run down the center of the road. Chris Blakeley, 1600 Long Lake Boulevard, asked when the project would be up and running, when residents can connect or will be required to connect, if the sewers would be available to all the residents at the same time, and when the assessment would take place. Cook informed him the project is e.xpected to be completed in October, 1997. Gaffron noted that the residents will have 16 months from the completion date to hook up. In the cases where a septic system might be destroyed from the sewer installation, the hook up would be made immediately. Blakeley asked w’hat would happen if the project w'as delayed into the winter months and hook up could not occur until spring. Cook said this was most unlikely. Kelley asked Gaffron to explain the procedure for abandoning the septic system once the hook up is made. Gaffron said the septic would be pumped out, the cover caved in and filled with sand or dirt, or native material found on the property. Glen Friden, 1925 Country Club Road (Lot 12 of Country Club Addition), said he agreed with Kelley's assessment of the advantages in hooking up to sewer if available. He said he was interested in knowing what the City would contribute to the project. He noted Gaffron said it has not been determined who would be the final contributors. He questioned whether all 55 participants would be included and how' any change to that number would affect the cost to those who do participate. Friden felt it is important to know the final number of participants, Friden questioned whether the properties along North Brow'n Road on the east side and a couple others not showTi on the map but receiving benefit from the project would also be included. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997 (#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Jabbour noted any resident hooking up after the cost calculations have been made with respect to number of participants would pay the full assessment amount and the savings would be returned to the City. He further elaborated that the Council needs a 4/5 majority vote to pass a motion on a bond. He noted the City has taken the position that those who receive the benefit of the sewering will be the ones to pay for the sewer and not the remaining residents. He noted the City has determined the assessment method to be most fair and just and reflects the benefit to the individual lot A work session will be scheduled regarding the subject Keith VandcrBrenden, 1480 Long Lake Boulevard, noted he has a mound system and asked if he would be hooking up when the sewer is in the street or when his current system fails. Jabbour noted that each resident has 16 months in which to hook up once the proje .t is completed. It was recognized, however, that exceptions have been made regarding residents with new septic systems. Goetten reported that residents have in the past been allowed several years in which to hook up in such cases. She informed VanderBrenden that each situation can be investigated. Peterson noted, however, that these residents would be required to pay the assessment right away. Jabbour added that residents have been given the option of hooking up within 5 years or when their current system fails, whichever occurs first. VanderBrenden also inquired if the sewer would be laid in the public right-of-way up to where the utility lines stop Cook said in some cases the line may extend onto private property and require easements. George Johnson, 879 North Brown Road, asked Gaffron about hook up and individual pumps for the properties on the west side of North Brown Road. Gaftron said there would be three individual grinder stations instead of one lift station and asked Johnson to speak with Cook regarding his situation. Cook said the property owner would actually own the grinder and not the City Johnson said he preferred no^ having individual grinder stations and having the City pay for the lift station in order to gain a higher quality pump. Cook noted the costs would then increase. Johnson noted the cost to the individual property owner would also increase, due to the operating costs ot individual grinder pumps. Keith Gasner asked who will make the decision regarding whether Dakota Avenue will be blacktopped and when Jabbour said the Council will make that determination taking citizen and StatVinput into consideration noting the work session to be held regarding the issue He asked residents to address specifics to Stafl. i 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 (#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Gasner asked what is the cost of the tar itself Cook said the cost is $1950 per residence or $19,000 on Dakota Avenue Gasner asked how this compares to Long Lake Boulevard. Cook said it would be the same. The blacktop is milled and reused at a cost of $2 per square yard. Cook did not know what the cost would be tor gravel only. He did note that the gravel base cost on the two roads would be similar. The Dakota Avenue paving is part of the recommendation. He noted the deterioration of Long Lake . Boulevard. The new surface would have a 20 year life expectancy with some upkeep maintenance required. Carrie Steinke, 910 Dakota Avenue, asked if the sewer can be installed without having .o pave the road. She was informed that this could happen. She asked if the consideration to pave was up to the residents. Goetten informed her that if all of the Dakota Avenue residents choose not to pave, the Council would honor that decision Jabbour informed her that Staff thought it their duty to bring the best reconr lendations forward and the residents opinion would influence the final decision. Mr. Steinke asked if the manholes can still be maintained if the road is covered with gravel only. Cook told him it can still be done. Nancy Goblin, 910 Dakota Avenue, asked if the City would plow a gravel road. She was informed by Cook that the City would not plow it because it is a private road. Tim Erickson, 880 Dakota Avenue, inquired about accessibility to their homes during the project and if the cost of asphalt for Dakota Avenue w as amongst those residents or those involved in the entire project Cook said the cost has not been finalized. It is recommended to be included as part of the total project cost. Jabbour noted that it the blacktopping was not done, the amount of contribution by the City w ould be reduced. He noted the City would not spend any more than necessary. Cook informed Erickson regarding access that there will be times when it is difficult. The intent is to complete the area on Long Lake Boulevard as quickly as possible. There are times w hen rain creates problems. The goal is to at least maintain access during a.m. and p.m. hours. Carrie Steinke asked if all the residents paid for the new sidewalk on Brown Road. Jabbour informed her that MSA funding paid for it, which in effect, means all of the residents paid for it. She asked if the same would happen with payment of the blacktop on Dakota Avenue. Respectfully, she noted that she does not benefit from the sidewalk on Brown. Goetten informed her that Brow'n Road is a MSA street, unlike, Dakota Avenue, wh.ch is not. A requirement of a MSA designation is a MS.A road leading into another MS.A road. Roger Carlson, 1580 Long Lake Boulevard, noted that the sewer requirements were due to requirements made by the State because of the lake Noting the lake is used by others, he questioned whether funding should be available here also Jabbour told him that the argument against this is that people do not have the right to pollute the lake MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997 (#6 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects -Continued) Curt Greenlee, 1485 Long Lake Boulevard, voiced concern with delays and the costly result of tearing up new blacktop. Cook informed him that the sewer stubs would be extended to the property lines which should eliminate this possibility. Peterson added that the project manager will ask individual residents where they wish their stub to be placed. Gaffron noted that the well location will also be taken into consideration. Jabbour reminded those in attendance that they should also take into consideration where future additions might be placed. The hearing was closed to the public. Goetten informed those in attendance that there will be future opportunities for the residents to voice additional concerns. GatTron said there will be Council meetings where the sewering will be discussed along with an assessment hearing before the improvement begins. Once the plans are completed, the bids will be made, the assessment hearing held, and the project ordered. Jabbour also noted that the project depends on the ability to obtain easements. (#7) ORDER PLANS AND SPECS FOR NORTH LONG LAKE & LONG LAKE COUNTRY CLUB SEWER - RESOLUTION #3829 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #3829 ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club sanitary sewer improvements. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (The meeting was recessed from 8; 15-8:25 p.m.) ' PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Use invited the Council to attend the Friends of the Park Award Ceremony to be held at 7:00 p.m. on February 3, 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner McMillan had no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13.1997 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT ('•#8) #2197 JOHN O'SULLIVAN, 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VACATION OF NAVARRE LANE - REVISED RESOLUTION #3830 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3830, agreeing to the fliture vacation of an unused portion of Navarre Lane in Section 17, Township 117 North, Range 23 in the City of Orono, Minnesota. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#9) ORONO TO BE DESIGNATED AS LEAD AGENCY IN SPRING HILL GOLF COURSE EAW - RESOLUTION #3831 Gaffron reponc ! that the property known as Spring Hill Conference Center is being considered as ^^/ling Hill Golf Course and requires designation of a City as the responsible governing unit due to the process of Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) review. Part of the property is located in Medina but the majority within Orono including the buildings. The developer and City of Medina have agreed that Orono should be the governing unit. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution accepting the RGU or Responsible Government Unit status for the Spring Hill Golf Club EAW. Goetten inquired if the Spring Hill group would be paying for the costs incurred by the City as a result of being the agent or RGU. Gaflron said Spring Hill group is doing the majority of the work and preparation of the work sheet There will be some Staff time involved. Gaffron said the City is obligated to go through the process to be involved in the review. He did not know if all of the costs could be passed on. Gaffron said the process includes review of the document, a publication period, and resolution of the draft. He noted 10-15 Staff hours have been spent and another 10-20 Staff hours may incur. He did not believe there would be any engineering or attorney costs involved. Gaffron said he expects a CUP application to be reviewed at the February ’ Planning Commission Meeting. An application fee would be taken in at that time. Goetten also inquired about a moratorium Gaffron said he did not believe the City would have an interest in a moratorium as the golf course use is a permitted use in that zoning district. ^ Tom Radio added that the EAW acts as a moratoii’jm as the City cannot issue the permit until the review process has been completed. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #38^1 accepting RGU status for the Spring Hill Golf Club EAW. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour welcomed the new Planner to the City, Elizabeth Van Zomeren Jabbour noted he received a call from Mark Engebretson extending his appreciation of the City Staff* regarding their assistance with the ice arena project. 4 i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997(Mayor/Council Report - Continued)Goetten recognized a letter received from John and Karla Spooner regarding the access from Orono Lane to CoRd 15. She thought they would have received information regarding the Count's plans for the road. Moorse said he would obtain a copy of the County plans and send them to the Spooners.Kelley asked how the City was doing regarding the amount of overtime for public works employees due to snow removal. Moorse said the City streets are able to be cleaned within an 8-hour time period. The personnel are called in to assist when plowing is nece.ssary. The only overtime involved has been when the snow has occurred on the weekends. Moorse said there has not been a problem. Kelley asked if the Public Works Department could use their pay loader machinery to push piles of snow away from intersections to aid sight lines. He noted that most private roads are cleared by pickup trucks who do not have this capability. Gappa said this has been occurring, and he will follow through. Goetten also asked that the sanding be extended further down the streets rather than at corners only. Gappa noted that the City was running out of places to put the accumulating snow. ENGINEER REPORT (*#I0) 1997 ENGINEERING FEES - BONESTROO Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the 1997 rates for general engineering services proposed by Bonestroo Associates. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT C*#!!) 1997 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE LMCIT APPLICATION FOR COVERAGE Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the 1997 Application for Coverage under the LMCIT Self-In.sured Worker's Compensation Plan and award the 1997 worker compensation insurance to the LMCIT for the initial net premium of $29,743, effective January 1, 1997. V'ole: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997(*#12) 1997 INSURANCE BID AWARDS(joetten moved. Kelley seconded, to award the insurance eftective January 1, 1997 to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for the comprehensive municipal property and casualty package $60,207, for the umbrella excess liability $15,588, for the petroRmd I'eimbursement $649, for the open meeting law $698, for the boiler and machinery $1,204, and for the surety bonds, $995, and to award the golf course liquor liability to St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, at a premium cost of $1,350. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#13) DECLARATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER VACANCY - RESOLUTION #3832 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution #3832 declaring a vacancy in the office of council member of the City of Orono. Jabbour asked the members of the Council what their vision is regarding filling the vacancy. Peterson said she would like to see the vacancy filled as soon as possible whether soliciting for new applicants or appointing a person who ran for the office. The issue of whether to consider a person who had been on the ballot was discussed. Peterson said she would recommend Richard Flint as he is well respected. Kelley agreed noting the work accomplished by Flint on the Park Commission. Goetten said she would also support the appointment of Flint as he is well qualified. Jabbour noted that the appointment has not been discussed among Council Members or the Mayor prior to the meeting. He also said he supports Flint. Radio noted that the appointment is not on the agenda for this meeting. Jabbour asked that the appointment be placed on the agenda of the next Council meeting. (#14) ESTABLISH COUNCIL WORK SESSION ON 1997 GOAL SETTING A work session will be held on January 30, 1997 at 8:00 a m. to discuss goals for the year. Jabbour noted the importance of distinguishing between a general work session for brainstorming and one of strategic planning. (#15) NORTH FERNDALE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Kelley said he is not opposed to the project. He noted that he is concerned about the timing because there are two large projects scheduled. He was concerned there would be a deficit in the MSA budget for 1997. Kelley suggested the project be moved to 1999. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997(#15 North Femdale Road Improvements - Continued)Peterson asked and received confirmation that the two cities of Orono and Plymouth need the same time schedule for the project. It was noted that Plymouth has slated for the project for 1998.Jabbour said the project was originally planned for 1997 but Plymouth had changed the time frame. He said while he agrees with Kelley’s concern over the budget, the improvement is lon,isticaIly overdue. Peterson said she agrees with Kelley. Moorse reported that no money was spent on CoRd 6 in 1997 and the same dollar amount would be spent in the two year period. Kelley said 1999 would still show a $170,000 deficit as well as accumulate interest. Goetten said the problem is having many roads in need of repair. She is of the opinion that the City needs to address these improvements on this road rather than postponing them because it has ahe^vdy been delayed a number of times. It was clarified that the project must be done as a singular project and cannot be separated by city. Gappa noted Plymouth has budgeted for the improvenient for 1998. Jabbour noted that the residents of Femdale Road voiced their concern over the roadway at the Hwy 12 meetings. He also noted its recognition by the newspaper as one of the worst roads. Kelley inquired about "borrowing" the MSA funds. Gappa said the funding allows for advance encumbering up to $500,000 The City is allowed to pay out of future allotments without interest. Council members said they were unaware of the ability to do so. Kelley and Peterson agreed that the project should then move forward. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve beginning the preliminary work on the project. Work authorized would include obtaining a proposal for project engineering from Bonestroo and the scheduling of a public informational meeting. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#16) ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION #3833 Moorse reported that changes have been made to the general appointments relating to the new staff changes. Some appointments have not yet been made. Jabbour asked if the policy committee was still required for Hwy 12. Moorse noted that there would be a design committee needed and suggested maintaining the policy committee at this time. r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 (#16- Annual Appointments - Continued) Jabbour asked that the rotating mayor appointment begin with Diann Goetten. The Park Commission Chair vacancy was also noted. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3833 giving temporary approval of the 1997 appointments with further changes to be made. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#17) NOISE ORDINANCE Moorse reported that revisions have been made to the draft. The problem of addressing complaints and ability to respond to them has been answered. Goetten asked for an explanation or example of the decibel numbers. Police Chief Cheswick said the department has a decibel meter. Cheswick said they looked at the example of stereo systems in a car by which to judge the sound levels. Boom boxes were also noted as a problem. He said the level where the human ear can be damaged is at 76 decibels. Goetten asked if the police would be required to be at the site of occurrence to make the determination. Cheswick said the determination would be made at the border of the property. The ordinance would state that the noise cannot go past the border of the property. Peterson asked if the ordinance would be enforceable? Cheswick noted something needs to be done regarding the problem. Peterson asked if the police department is required to be present when the noise level is occurring. Cheswick said citizens can make a complaint. ' Kelley asked how the ordinance is affected in regards to snow blowers, etc. Cheswick said there are exemptions and control factors regarding equipment. Chesw'ick noted that the decibel range was looked at from an industrial and commercial standpoint which is difterent from that of residential property. Cheswick noted there were 230 complaints handled by the police department in 1995 and 249 in 1996, 97 directly in Orono. The majority of the complaints were residential. He noted the ordinance comes from that prepared by the League of Cities. Jabbour said the LMCD also has a decibel ordinance for boats of 82 decibels. The water patrol boats carry decibel meters. Cheswick said neighboring cities have noise ordinances and sees the need for uniformity. He did note that the decibel level allowed in Long Lake is 55 decibels. Peterson questioned why the limit in this ordinance is difterent from Long Lake ’s it there is the desire for consistency. Cheswick said he believes 55 decibels is too low. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997 (#17 - Noise Ordinance - Continued) Kelley asked who is considered the noise control officer. GafFron said the code lists peace officers, police reserve, community service officers, zoning administrator, building administrator, and public works. Elizabeth Van Zomeren reported she has dealt with the issue of noise in the past. She indicated that the City of Minneapolis had discussed ordinance amendments to allow the police officer to be regarded as the person "offended". Jabbour asked that the issue be tabled to the next meeting to allow for the City Planner’s input. Goetten noted that no one wants to have to confront their neighbor. Peterson agreed that it is hoped that it would be a common sense issue but in reality is not so. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to table the noise ordinance to the January 27 meeting. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#18) RESIGNATION OF JEANNE A. MABUSTH, BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to accept the resignation of Jeanne A. Mabusth from her position of Building and Zoning Administrator effective March 21, 1997. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#19) APPOINTMENT OF ELIZABETH VAN ZOMEREN TO PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTR/\TOR Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to appoint Elizabeth Van Zomeren to the position of City Planner/Zoning Administrator effective January 13, 1997 at a starting s^ary of $45,000, and providing for quarterly performance reviews during the first year. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Jabbour congratulated Moorse on the process and participation taken. (#20) APPOINTMENT OF COREY FARNIOK TO FULI^TIME POLICE OFFICER Moorse reported that Famiok has worked in the department as an intern, a community service officer, r- part-time police officer with an e.xcellent performance record. Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the appointment of Corey Famiok to the position of full-time police officer effective January 1, 1997 at a starting pay rate of $15.92 per hour. V'ote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997 (#20 - Appointment of Corey Famiok to Full-Time Police Officer - Continued) Peterson asked how the federal grant amount of $75,000 would be allocated. Moorse said although it can be spent in one year, the City is electing to spread the grant amount over a three year period. (#21) SELECTION OF DATE FOR 1997 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING Moorse reported the recommended date is April 16. Jabbour asked that the date be set for April 23. Moorse will confirm this date with the assessor. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Radio had no report at this time. (*#22) LICENSES Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the following licenses: Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. One Day Off Site Gambling Permit (raffle) - Resolution #3S34 Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. Orono High School Sunday, January 19, 1997 Commercial Kennel License The Dog House Boarding Kennels, Inc. 3505 Wayzata Boulevard Residential Kennel License Jane Kline and Steve Bell 4455 West Branch Road Stephen G. Esco 320 Big Island Willi Hoyer and H. Zohara 565 Hanlon Avenue Kenneth B. & Karen S Rolland 4119 Oak Street flp- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13,1997 (#22 - Licenses - Continued) Greg & Nancy Truchinski 1580 Fox Street (*#23) BILLS Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn at 9:18 p.m. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk I m ti nn J*A. i j REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1997 °SCA,o DATE: January 24, 1997 ITEM NO.: 4^ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Projects Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: ^2195 Genmar Industries, inc., 1449 Shoreline Drive - Commercial Site Plan Review/Variances/Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning District: B-2 Lakeshore Business District. Application: Request for commercial site plan review approval and variances for construction of a new building to replace the existing building on the property. The proposal requires variances for lakeshore and street (front yard) setbacks, 0- 75' and 75-250' hardcover, parking and boat storage within 75' of the lake, lot area and depth. Additional variances related to parking stall numbers and location, and tree removal within 75' of the shoreline, are also requested. A CUP and variances are required for land alterations in the 0-75' zone^and in excess of 100 cubic yards, for the proposed parking and stormwater pond expansions. Note: This item is being brought forward to the Council directly after the Tuesday, January 19th Planning Commission meeting because I will be out of town for the February 10th meeting. However, the City has extended the sixty day review period to February 12th should Council desire to table the application for any reason. List of Exhibits A - Draft Resolution B - Comments from Orono Lane Residents C - Memo and Exhibits of 1/16/97 D - Additional Selected Exhibits from November Planning Commission Packet Application Background This item was first reviewed by the Planning Commission at their November meeting, at which time Planning Commission raised a number of concerns which resulted in tabling of the s Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 January 24, 1997 Zoning File #2195 application. Those concerns included the appearance and construction of the building, the use of proposed grass area within the lakeshore yard for display of boats for sale, the lack of adequate parking, the lack of public restroom facilities for slip customers, lack of boat head pumpout, storm water facilities needs, and general intensity of use on the site. The application was tabled, and applicants were advised to return in January with a revised proposal addressing the stated concerns. Applicants then submitted a revised proposal which was reviewed by Planning Commission on January 19th. That proposal is detailed in the staff memo of January 16th. Please review that memo for additional background information. It should be noted that the intent of this application is to provide a suitable sales office space for lease to King's Cove Marina based in Hastings, who will be operating a bosi sales business at this site and who will also act as site manager for the slip rental operation. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission expressed general approval for the revisions to the proposed structure, making it more residential in character as compared to the previously proposed double wide modular structure. Planning Commission expressed little concern about the lot area and depth variances, and indicated general approval of the increases in lakeshore and street setbabk that would result from replacement of the existing building, even though the lot depth would not allow for completely conforming street and lake setbacks. Planning Commission expressed some concern regarding the proposed storage of boats in the required lakeshore yard where no such storage is normally allowed, given that that area will revert from structure to a lawn non-hardcover area. Discussion centered around the potential for that area remaining non-hardcover while accommodating boats on trailers and pedestrian traffic. Applicants indicated they did not intend for customers to be boarding those boats and anticipated no negative impact on the lawn areas from the storage of up to 6 boats at that location. Planning Commission felt it was not appropriate to use required parking stalls for boat storage, and indicated apparent acceptance for display of boats on the grass, as long as careful attention is paid to keeping that as a non-hardcover area. The primary issue of concern to the Planning Commission was balancing the hardcover and parking expansion issues. It was noted that the code requires an additional 10 stalls, and Planning Commission did not buy into the applicants’ interpretation of the code that only a 3 stall variance is necessary because 12 of 111 slips will be converted to non-rental for displaying boats for sale. In considering whether the parking lot should be expanded by 10 spaces to yield conforming i Request for Council Action continued page 3 of A Januar> 24, 1997 Zoning File ^2195 number of stalh accommodate the 111 slips plus the retail operation and employee parking, Planning Comm; ;sicM noted that a 3 stall increase would still result in a hardcover decrease on the site due to th'; smaller building proposed. Planning Commission was not in favor of increasing 0-75’ hardcove r by nearly 1,800 s.f. to accommodate a 10 stall increase. An additional factor in this conclusion was that creation of 10 additional spaces coupled with a future ceasing of retail sales, would provide enough parking to potentially be used by Genmar as justification for an increase in slip numbers at the site. Planning Commission felt that this site has reached its maximum development potential given the severe restrictions of the property. As a result of their discussion. Planning Commission concluded that a 3 stall parking increase coupled with an expansion of the storm water pond on the site to meet NURP standards, would be most appropriate. Planning Commission expressed concerns regarding tree removal and apparent lack of 1 for 1 replacement, however, it was pointed out that significant new vegetation will be proposed around the new building area, while expansion of the storm water pond removes trees but leaves little room on the fringes for 1 to 1 replacement. Planning Commission expressed approval of the proposed men’s and women's restrooms for use by slip customers within the east end of the proposed building. Those restrooms are intended to have keyed locks, and each slip customer will be provided with keys, thereby providing access to the intended users but not to the general public. Planning Commission accepted the prbposed enclosure and continued use of the satellite portable toilets on the Tanager Lake side of the property. This will presumably be a three sided wood enclosure presumably 6-8’ in height. Finally, Planning Commission agreed with staff that the many operational aspects of the proposed retail sales use should be formalized as conditions of approval, leaving it to staff to define those conditions in the resolution. Planning Commission also questioned whether some sort of criteria should be established for determining when/if a parking becomes a problem on the site, then concluded it would be difficult to establish such criteria and dropped that idea. Staff Recommendation The negative aspects of increasing hardcover on the site for increased parking are substantial, suggesting that parking increases should be kept to a minimum. The positive aspects of replacing the existing 2-story 30' x 80’ building with a 1-story 24' x 48’ building are similarly substantial. Expansion of the stormwater pond to NURP standards will substantially enhance the quality of runoff water leaving the site. Ten additional parking stalls are required by current code to accommodate the proposed retail sales use and employee parking, while providing the required number of stalls for boat slips. Adding ten stalls will significantly increase hardcover on the Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 4 January 24, 1997 Zoning File #2195 site.This combination of facts suggests that the site is not capable of supporting all the proposed uses within the requirements of the code. Council is faced with the following options: grant a variance to the number of parking stalls required and allow the uses as proposed, with conditions; OR allow the retail sales use and building replacement only in conjunction with a decrease in the number of slips, resulting in a conforming level of parking; OR deny the variance request and anticipate that the existing building will be remodeled and used for allowed B-2 uses which have parking needs requiring no more than one employee stall. Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation and comments over the last two months, staff has drafted a resolution containing specific findings of fact and specific conditions of approval for Genmar's proposal. Because Planning Commission did not always specify individual findings for its conclusions, staff has drafted such findings for Council consideration. Council is requested to carefully review the resolution. If Council concludes that application approval is warranted, Council is requested to provide staff with direction regarding any resolution revisions that may be appropriate. ' Options for Action 1. Adopt the attached approval resolution with or without revisions. 2. Table, giving specific reasons. 3. Conceptually deny, direct staff to draft a denial resolution, stating specific reasons for denial. 4.Other. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve, table or conceptually deny application #2195. 1 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISIONS 8,9,12 AND 13; SECTIONS 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16 (A), (C), (J) AND (L); AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 - 21 FILE NO. 2195 WHEREAS, Genmar Industries, Inc. (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 1449 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafte? the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the demolition of the existing 30' x 80' building on the property and replacing it with a 24’ x 48 ’ retail sales office building. The proposal includes expansion of the existing 68 stall parking lot by adding three additional parking stalls for a total of 71 stalls, and includes the expansion of the existing stormwater management pond on the site. The proposed improvements require the following approvals: A. Commercial site plan review approval per Section 10.41, Subdivision 4. B. C. D. E. Lot area variance (existing = 1.86 acres east of County Road 15, required — 2 acres) per Section 10.41, Subdivision 12 (B-1). Variance for "Lot Width Perpendicular to Lakeshore" (lot depth) less than the required 200 ’ per Section 10.41, Subdivision 12 (B-3). Variance for a street setback of 17 ’ where a 30 ’ street setback is normally required per Section 10.41, Subdivision 12 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(2). Lakeshore setback variance for construction of a building 47 ’ from the shoreline where a 75’ structural lakeshore setback is normally required per Sections 10.41, Subdivision 13 (A), 10.55, Subdivision 8, and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(1). Page 1 of 15 >lr [: F. G. H. A variance to hardcover limitations per Section 10.41, Subdivision 13 (D) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L). A variance to allow storage of boats, etc. within the required 75' lakeshore yard per Section 10.41, Subdivision 9. A variance to the required number of parking stalls per Section 10.41, Subdivision 8. I. J. Continuing variances for parking spaces separated by a public roadway from the dock they are designed to serve and parking within required yard or landscape area per Section 10.41, Subdivisions 8 (E) and 8 (G). Conditional use permit and variance for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and within 75' of the shoreline per Sections 10.03 Subdivisions 19-21; 10.55 Subd. 8; and 10.56 Subdivision 16(J) to create additional parking and stormwater pond expansion. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2195. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District requiring a minimum of two acres of lot area and 200' lot depth. The marina property is divided by County Road 15 and consists of 1.86 acres on the east portion of the property and 1.44 acres on the west side of County Road 15. The portion of property on the east side is 115 feet in depth at the proposed building location. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 21, 1997 and recommended approval of the proposal subject to a three stall parking increase and concurrent stormwater system upgrade, and subject to adherence to the site and Page 2 of 15 4. landscaping plans proposed, the construction plans proposed, and formalization of the proposed operation of the site as a condition of City approval. The Orono City Council reviewed this application on January 27, 1997, and approved the proposed variances, conditional use permit and commercial site plan based upon one or more of the following findings and hardships: A. Orono Zoning Code Section 10.41, Subdivision 8 in part imposes the following parking requirements for specific uses within the B-2 Lakeshore Business District: 'a') Six parking spaces shall be provided for each ten boat slips on water or on land. ’b’) •e’) At least eight off-street parking spaces, plus one additional space for each 800 square feet of floor area over 1000 square feet, including warehousing, and all outside sales and storage areas related to the sales and service functions. % The required parking spaces may not be separated by a public roadway from the dock, a storage space, mooring space, floor space, or ramp they are designed to serve. 'g') Parking may not be allowed in any required yard or landscaping area. B. 'h') Employee parking spaces shall be in addition to the parking spaces required above. The number of employee parking spaces shall be designated on an official parking plan to be kept on file with the City. The applicants suggest there is a distinction in intensity of use between slips rented for use by customers and slips used for display of boats for sale. Section 10.41, Subdivision 8 defines no such distinction. The City Council finds that no such distinction exists, and that the use of slips for display of Pace 3 of 15 r D. boats for sale has potential for a similar intensity of use as that of rental slips. The Council further concludes that all 111 existing slips in the water must be used for calculation of parking requirements under Section 10.41(A), and the number of parking stalls required thereunder shall be in addition to the number required under Sections 10.41 ('b') and ('h'). C. Required parking on the property is calculated as follows: Per 10.41(A): 111 slips x 0.6 parking stall per slip = Per 10.41(B): Retail area ^ 1 ,(X)0 s.f. = Per 10.41(H): 3 employees proposed= Total Stalls Required = 67 stalls 8 stalls 3 stalls 78 stalls Parking provided on the site currently: Proposed additional parking to be created: Total Stalls Proposed = 68 stalls 3 stalls 71 Stalls Parking Variance Required:7 stalls The City Council has considered the following facts, findings and conclusions in determining whether sufficient hardship and justification exists to grant a parking variance for this site: This property in its entirety is severely limited in development potential due to its proximity to the shoreline. Approximately 2.62 acres or 79% of the total 3.30 acre site is located within 75 feet of the shoreline where no parking or hardcover is normally allowed. On the east side of Shoreline Drive, 85% of the property is within 75 feet of the shoreline. On the west side of Shoreline Drive, 72% of the property is within 75' of the shoreline. On the west side of Shoreline Drive, the property is further severely limited in development potential due to existing topography. The west side area not within the 0-75' setback is comprised of a natural bluff feature which is protected from alteration by the City's Shoreland ordinances, and therefore no parking areas can be Page 4 of 15 i developed on the west side of Shoreline Drive. The creation of three additional parking stalls on the east side will result in increased hardcover adjacent to the existing parking lot, but such hardcover increase will be more than offset by reductions in hardcover resulting from the replacement of the existing building on the site with a smaller building. The net site result is a 726 s.f. reduction in hardcover. Creation of a total of ten additional parking stalls on die east side would result in a conforming number of stalls for the proposed use of the site but : result in a net increase in hardcover on the property of 1,699 s.f. The Council finds that such a hardcover increase, which would be almost entirely within the 0-75' setback zone, is not justifiable given the City's history of strict hardcover regulation and the lack of demonstrated hardship for such increase. Further, it is the Council's position and a condition of annual license approval that it is the applicant's responsibility to manage on-site parking in a manner that will not result in traffic congestion nor create a hazardous situation. This marina has technically been in conformity with City regulations for the number of parking stalls in the past and currently. In fact, this marina was required to provide additional parking stalls in 1989 to remain in conformity with City regulations while accommodating an LMCD-approved increase in boat slips on Tanager Lake. Variances were granted by the City at that time for the location of the added parking. Further, when the City changed the B-2 ordinance in 1995 by requiring employee parking in addition to the slip-generated parking, this marina remained in conformity since it had one available stall for employees and there have been few if any employees stationed at this site since that code revision. This history of conformity is in direct contrast to other similarly Page 5 of 15 f f. u^i .1» 8) situated marinas in Orono which have for decades been non- conforming as to the required number of stalls. The Council finds that the negative aspects of increasing hardcover on the site for increased parking are substantial, suggesting that parking increases should be kept to a minimum. The Council further finds that the positive aspects of replacing the existing 2- story, 30' x 80' building on the site with a 1-story, 24' x 48 ’ building, are similarly substantial. It is the position of the City Council that this site has reached, and perhaps exceeded, its capacity for use and development. Further, the Council finds that any increase in the number of slips either in the water or on land, cannot be reasonably accommodated on the site due to the limitations imposed on the site by Orono's environmental protection regulations. Therefore, any approval of variances to allow new uses which intensify activity on the site, or which could unintentionally result a future intensification of activity on the site, must be carefully weighed in terms of balancing the property owner's rights against the environmental risks as well as public health, safety and welfare concerns. The Council finds that such a balance may be reached by allowing the proposed building replacement and boat sales use, conditioned upon an increase of three parking stalls with concurrent upgrade of stormwater facilities to current City standards, and conditioned upon further site and operational limitations which are intended to result in no intensification of use of the site. Further, limiting the increase to three stalls minimizes the City's risk of unintentional intensification of use of the site, in that should the retail sales use cease, use of 'additional parking now available' as a justification for increasing the number of slips at the site, has been minimized. Under LMCD codes, this site could conceivably be approved for an LMCD 'special density license' allowing up to one slip per 10 feet of shoreline length. The site has approximately 3310 feet of Page 6 of 15 E. F. shoreline including the breakwater in Brown's Bay, or approximately 2100 feet of shoreline excluding the breakwater. The current boat density including the breakwater is 3310/111 = 29.8 feet of shoreline per slip. Excluding the breakwater, current boat density is 2100/111 = 18.9 feet of shoreline per slip. It is conceivable that LMCD could, within its ordinances, allow a total of as many as 331 slips at this site under the maximum 'special density’ scenario. 12) The Council finds that any increase above the existing 111 slip level cannot be accommodated by the land portion of this site, over which the City exerts primary zoning and land use jurisdiction. The City will oppose any future attempts by the property owner to increase the number of boat slips in the water or on the land at this site. Further, this and future owners are advised that it is the intent of the City Council that the City not allow future increases of hardcover or fumre intensification of land based functions and activity at this site. The City Council finds that the proposed removal of the existing building which is located 20 ’ from the shoreline and replacement with a new building which will be 47’ from the shoreline, results in an increase in setback conformity to the 75’ lakeshore setback requirement. Similarly, the increase in street setback from 12 ’ existing to 17’ proposed where a 30 ’ setback is required, results in increased setback conformity. The limited site depth between the road and the lake of approximately 115 feet at the building location, would leave a conforming buildable envelope only 10 feet in depth, too narrow to accommodate a building without variances. The Council further finds that the historic use of this site as a marina and the existing improvements to it are sufficient justification to grant a variance for 'lot depth’. While the total lot area of the site is 3.30 acres, the site consists of two tax parcels, each of which is partially located on both sides of Shoreline Drive. Page 7 of 15 The tax parcel upon which the majority of site improvements are located has a total area of approximately 1.1 acres on the east side of Shoreline Drive and approximately 0.2 acres on the west side, a total parcel area of less than the required lot area of 2.0 acres. Therefore, it would be appropriate that the property owner be required to either legally combine the two tax parcels or, if Hennepin County will not allow such a combination across quarter section lines, be required to execute a Special Lot Combination for this site. G. H. J The City Council finds that the Findings of Fact in Resolution No. 2638 adopted by the City Council on May 22, 1988 with regards to the required variance for parking located on the opposite side of Shoreline Drive from the slips served, are still valid and sufficient justification for continuing that variance, and further given that there have been no documented accidents attributable to the separated location of parking at this location. The proposed removal of the existing building, construction of a new replacement building, and construction of a 3-stall parking addition, will result in a net decrease in hardcover on the east side of Shoreline Drive from 23,854 s.f. (34.55%) to 23,215 s.f. (33.62%) in the 0-75’ setback zone and a reduction from 9,003 s.f. (73.94%) to 8,916 s.f.(73.23%) in the 75-250' zone. This is a net overall hardcover reduction of 726 s.f. on the site, making the site less non-conforming to the hardcover requirements. The variance for the proposed storage of boats displayed for sale within the lakeshore yard between the new building and the shoreline, is partly justified by the conversion of that space from a 2-story structure to open space. Limiting the number of boats stored at this location, requiring that this area be maintained as a non-hardcover grassed lawn area, and limiting the boundaries of the area to be used for boat storage, will limit the visual and environmental impacts of storage of boats at this location. The applicants have provided an acceptable landscaping improvement plan including the replacement of trees removed during construction, as well as including decorative vegetation around the proposed building. The Page 8 of 15 (?■ K. M. N. landscaping improvements will be completed concurrently with the proposed site improvements. Applicants have agreed to providing the following site improvements which are required by the zoning code: Sanitary facilities for slip customers, to be located within the new building. 2) 3) Boat head pumpout facility. Upgraded stormwater management facilities meeting NURP standards. L. Applicants have agreed to provide these additional amenities to enhance the attractiveness of this site: Screening of the portable toilets which are intended to remain in use on the Tanager Lake side of Shoreline Drive. 2) Building construction, facade and materials of a nature compatible with the residential namre of the surrounding neighborhoods. Signage of a subdued nature to soften the visual impact of allowed signage. Applicants have agreed to a number of site operation conditions and limitations which will ensure that the operation of the site occurs in a manner that will minimize the impacts of the intensity of use proposed for the site, such conditions and limitations enumerated in the "Conclusions, Order and Conditions" section of this Resolution. The City engineer has conceptually approved the proposed stormwater plan subject to specific modifications in the plan. Page 9 of 15 5. 6. 7. The Council has considered this application including the findings of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health safety and welfare of the community. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that the expansion of the parking area by three stalls within the lakeshore protected area, and the concurrent construction of a stormwater management pond meeting NURP standards, all located within the 0-75 ’ lakeshore setback zone, will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants the variances and conditional use permit for Genmar, Inc. as set forth above and hereby approves the commercial site plan dated 12-31-9 by Sather Berquist, Inc. entitled "Proposed 3- Stall Grading, Storm Sewer and Landscape Plan, Genmar, Orono, Minnesota" including 1' =20' enhancement drawings, the aforementioned plans attached to this resolution as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Applicant shall provide the following site improvements and amenities: a. 3-stall expansion of parking lot per the approved plan. Page 10 of 15 A i 2. b. Upgraded stormwater management facilities per the approved plan. c. d. Sanitary facilities for slip customers, located within the new building. Boat head pumpout facility. e.Screening of portable toilets to be continued in use on west side of Shoreline Drive, subject to design approval by City staff. f.Building construction, facade and materials per the construction plan attached as Exhibit C. g. Landscaping improvements per the approved plan. h. Signage per the general design and construction as shown in Exhibit C. Property owner shall execute a Developer's Agreement and post a Letter of Credit (150% of cost of required improvements) with the City to ensure the following improvements are fulfilled upon installation of the expanded parking aita and stormwater improvements: A.Stormwater management improvements per final plan subject to approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Orono. The City Engineer has requested the following amendments to the grading and stormwater plan: Storm sewer inlet iJiven should be set at elevation 929.4. The invert of the existing outlet pipe should be extended to elevation 928.0 on the pond side to provide skimming of floatables and debris. 2) The grading plan should be revised to show a drainage swale near the pond outlet pipe set at the pond high water level elevation 930.8. Page 11 of 15 3. 4. The south end of the parking lot should be raised to an elevation of 931.3 to prevent water from ponding in the parking area. B.Planting of replacement trees and shrubs in the area adjacent to the parking and stormwater pond expansion. Proposed landscaping features including vegetative plantings shown on the landscaping plan shall be completed concurrently with the building construction and parking lot/stormwater pond expansion. Erosion control methods adhering to the appropriate Best Management Practices shall be employed at all times on the site during expansion of the parking lot and stormwater pond construction. 5. Applicant shall adhere to the following site operation conditions: a. b. c. d. e. f. g- h. Use of the building is limited to boat sales office, minimal parts sales related directly to the boat sales operation, and slip rental activity. No other uses shall be allowed without review and approval by the City Council.* Maximum number of emloyees housed at the site is limited to three. Slip customer retroom facility shall be managed so as to be accessible to the intended users at all times. No porta-potties shall be allowed on the east side of Shoreline Drive after completion of the indoor facilities. Portable head pumpout equipment location and operational aspects shall be subject to review and approval by City staff. Property owner shall advise the City of the name of the lessee/site operator, and shall advise the City of any changes in the status of such person(s). The site may be used for the winter storage of no more than 5 boats without further city approval. No more than six boats may be displayed for sale on the property between the shoreline and the east side of the building. Property owner shall take whatever steps are necessary to prevent this area from becoming impermeable to surface runoff infiltration. No boats for sale shall at any time be stored in required parking stalls. Paee 12 of 15 1 f 6. J- k. 1. m. The operator of the site shall not establish permanent facilities for the performing of oil changes, maintenance or other significant boat service related functions. Light boat prep activity will be allowed. The boat sales operation shall not be open on Sundays except for up to four (4) Sundays each calendar year, such days to be designated on a yearly basis at the time of annual license approval. Lighting shall be established so as to not be obtrusive to neighboring properties or lake users. ^ f The site manager shall take whatever steps are necessary and prudent to alleviate any parking overflow concerns should they occur. Applicant is advised that the City regarding is unlikely to approve and will likely oppose future e.xpansion and intensification of use on this property, including but not limited to: - future increases in hardcover above the levels approved in the approved hardcover plan and calculations attached as Exhibit D - future increases in the number of land or water slips above the currently approved levels - future site uses which require additional parking based on cify code requirements 7. 8. Applicant is advised that the following permits must be obtained prior to commencement of work at the site: a. Demolition permit for removal of existing building b. Building permit for new building, and subsequent general permits for related plumbing, sewer connection, mechanical, etc. c. Land alteration permit for construction of parking lot and stormwater improvements. d. Building permit for portable toilet screen. Applicant is advised that MCWD approval may be required for the proposed site grading plan. Applicants shall legally combine the two tax parcels comprising the property, and if such a combination is not allowed b> the County, applicants shall execute a Special Lot Combination agreement for filing in the Chain of Title. Page 13 of 15 9.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (January 27, 1998). 10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code; shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 11. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of Genmar Industries, Inc., its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Cijt'hcil this 27th day of January, 1997. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Deputy Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 14 of 15 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of January, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and Deputy Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 15 of 15 ...----------------- .1. .«.4PawTT T<WC-i. r Dan. :'l. \QU 1397 Orono Lane \\ avzata, .Minnesoia 55391 ^-1 January 22, 1997 Mr. A1 Willcutt Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 2500 Shadywood Road - Suite #19 Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear A1: We, the residents of Orono Lane, have concerns about planned changes to the lakeshore side of Browns Bay Marina with it's proposed rebuilding plans. As you know, we all face the lakeshore side. In the past vre have worked with the LMCD with regard to the Marina's dock slips, in number, size and configura­ tion. Maintaining our sight-line across the Lake is of paramount concern. In addition, we have had pollution concerns about the use of old tires currently used as jetties in the water. Further, increased milfoil is choking out our bay, so increased boat traffic and the intro duction of a pump-out station are very alarming. We have had representation at the Orono Planning Commission meeting of January 21, 1997 and we will be at the Orono Council meeting on January 27, 1997. We have reviewed the city application plans for rebuilding and redesigning the Marina. Genmar Industries has pledged they are NOT planning any changes to number, size or configuration of dock slips. The city has passed the planned changes based on those statements, with the explanation that LMCD holds the power to monitor the lakeshore im­ pact. That is why v;e are appealing to you. We are asking you to be sure this nledge is upheld and that if any changes are contemplated, we would be notified in advance by the LMCD. A written response would be most appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. ri.*' t I Wti ■ m ■■ I iriMTTiiMii i M Dana M. \\clls 1397 Orono Lane \\ avzata, i^\innesota 55391 Sincerely, Elizabeth W. Norton 1399 Orono Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 § I id , Dana M. Wells 1397 Orono Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 ♦ 11) cJJtSi Jane T. & Richard F. Noland 1395 Orono Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Gail & Henry W. See 138^ Orono Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Judy & D. Craig Moen 1387 Orono Lane Wayzata, M1>I 55391 Karla & John Spooner 1385 Orono Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 enc; Plat Map Correspondence 1991 & 1992 Windward Marine Dock Plan 1981-1992 on Brown's Bay cc: Orono Mayor Gabriel Jabbour Orono CounciImembers Orono Planning Commission Members i • • • • • '*V. , ^ i vrV . .v>/.: ‘4',"*.»» .*“1 (*: v'*;o Hole; bacwoe «kw wilw on Vis ccrnor, Uiis dock Melon oru reowrod A pari of R «aa UMd lo ulond dock h K69 and two Ihgors wontekicalcd aBBWM WINDWARD MARINE IN Thosa dock fngcra toloalod form t» and oMHj dock U. .-itUtlViil MAR 21990 f/ • ii.J*5JA1 V»A55 V OSJ u '• a"’’-/•■-av ,''; scv.v^v, •;. .■• i»v,, ..•''/A-,,.,• .■•.■■■ v< , I • .1. r i •-..: c-i'Six J Vl Dana h\. Wells 1397 Orono Lane Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 January 18, 1991 Eugene R. Stromfr.en Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 East Lake Wayzata MN 55391 Dear Mr. Strommen: Following our meeting last June 14, 1990, you assured me the permit for Windward Marina was only temporary due to extremely mitigating circumstances. The lake level determination was made in February '90 when the water was at its lowest level and there was essentially no snow cover. Just after that determination, the level of lake increased and was substantially improved by summer. You assured me that that permit would not need to be extended with the increased water level. That level has increased and has been sustained throughout the season. So it would be assumed that Windward Marina will not be permitted an extention this year. You also assured me that if there would be any need for an extention of their permit, you would notify me prior to approval. As you witnessed last June and photographed, the visual impact on my street is significant. At that time I gave you photos of previous summers to note the change and put in Windward Marina's file. This is a serious issue for my neighbors and me. We expect your commitment , of last summer to be upheld and that there would be a hearing for us to attend before passing any extentions, temporary or otherwise, to Windward Marina. Thank you for your cooperation Sincerely, . Lt) Dana Wells DW/ts cc -Jean Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, Orono City Hall Elizabeth Norton M/M Richard Nolan M/M Henry See M/M D. Craig Moen M/M Newell Weed RECEIVLU JAM 2 2 1991 L.M.C.D BOARD MCJaCRS Oavftf R Cochran* Chik Abort 0. Po^tf. Vico Chair Ooophavon OouQtaa Baboodt. Socfolary Spring Park Jan Boawinhot. Troaauror MInnoionka Boach OavbBartoo Vldorla Mi/vin Bjodin Tonka Bay SoottCadaon Minnotfteta Jamoa N. Qralhwol Eioiliior JoEHonLHUfr Ofono Thomaa Marttnaon Wi/xata Robort K. Pliahury Mlnnoionka RobortRaaoop ShorowDOd Thomaa W. Rooao Mourtd Rcbort E. Sbcum Woodland p/7 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTI^'lCT February 21, 1991 900 EAST WAyZATABOUUEVAflO. SUITE 160 WAYZATA. M'NNESOTA SS39I TELEPHONE 6I?/4T3 7013 EUGENE R.STROUUEN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Jim Rivers, Pres. 1444 Shoreline Dr. WayzaCa, MN 55391 Dear Jim: Confirming our telephone conversation today, we are forwarding a modified form for your use in applying for your 1991 Temporary Low Water Variance. The application you submitted last December did not state the temporary distance you expected at that time, and the new form is more descriptive of the Information we require to act on these requests. With the current water level at 926.63', compared with 925.4' at this time a year ago, you may be in a position to re-assess the need to extend your dock the full 80' for the 1991 season. The LMCD Board does recognize some allowance for projecting lake levels later in the boating season must be made, particularly as the lake levels tend to decrease in the late summerl Your application should be returned to our offices by March 1 since the Water Structures Committee prepares to act on them at its March 9 meeting. If you prefer to have the application acted upon in April, you may do so. We would need the application by April 5 for an April 13 meeting. As we further discussed today, your extension request is to be supported by water depth readings to the furthest distance you propose to extend. These may be taken either through the ice at this time or when the water opens. We request that you advise us when you will take the depth readings so our dock inspection, Rachel Thibault, can be present. The attached correspondence from Dana M. Wells further identifies area concerns for the extent to which your dock is extended. We appreciate your consideration in recognizing these concerns as well. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely,'^1 yd' %<i' c: Jean Mabusth, Cit^^'bf Orono Dana M. Wells 'f/Ud J Dana \\c!U 1397 Cror.o Lar.c \V avzata, .^lir.acsota 55391 Eugene Strorronen Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 E. Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 y> Dear Gene: Again it is the time of year to be thinking of ice out and decks in for suraner '92. That brings up our fears that '.Windward Marine will request a dock extension again. Clearly the extensions they v/ere granted during the low water years are unnecessary this year. We were assured by you that those permits beyond 200' were due to extenuating circumstances and offered no precedence to the future. The lake level is back to normal and we expect their docks to extend no further than normal water levels. In order to avoid any misunderstanding, you have in your files the photographs taken from my yard during normal lake levels; this year should be the same. In the event anything different is comtemplated, please be in touch with me well in advance of any meeting. At last year's meeting we also brought up our concerns about the rocks they have put in the lake to form jetties. Representative Cocran was very concerned and questioned who issued that permit. Have you determined that yet? Is there a plan or some recourse to » remove them? Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Qjll 6___ Dana M. Wells February 25, 1992 DM'W/ts I . I 11 ■mami a MM a Mi r mm —fTraa**—tt —V* ^ ■ ■ ■ * rM Harr-*- • t Mt tti to L—. TO:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator C FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Projects Coordinator DATE:January 16, J997 SUBJECT:#2195 Genmar Industries, Inc./Minnetonka Boat Works, 1449 Shoreline Drive - Variance/Commercial Site i^lan Review - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: B>2, Lakeshore Business District. Application: Revised request for commercial site plan review approval and variances for construction of a new building to replace the existing building on the property. The revised proposal requires variances for lakeshore and street (front yard) setbacks, 0-75' and 75-250' hardcover, lot area and depth. Additional variances related to parking stall numbers and location, and tree removed within 75' of the shoreline, may be necessaiy depending upon which of the two parking plans is adopted. List of Exhibits A - Applicants' Transmittal Letter of 1/7/97 with Accompanying L::hibits: 1 - Letter of Request/Hardship Statement/Summary Table Hardcover Calculations for 2 Parking Area Options NURP Calculations Existing Conditions Plan and Enlargement Proposed 10 Stall Site Plan and Enlargements Proposed 3 Stall Site Plan and Enlargements Proposed Building Perspective Proposed Building Plans and Views B - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/96 C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/26/96 D - Letter from Louis B. Oberhauser 12/2/96 E - City Engineer's Comments 1/16/97 F-Staff Memo of 11/15/96 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- Synopsis At the November meeting. Planning Commission re\ iewed Genmar's proposal to replace the e.xisting 30'x80' building with a smaller 24'.\46' structure to ser\e as a boat sales and slip rental office for the —-- -----------------------------------------------« I '.uif rr^--I* M I > nr ITT - m r-n ‘iim “nniTiTf-T^^^^Vr* n-Y hum irminni h Zoning File #2195 January 16, 1997 Page 2 marina. During that review. Planning Commission raised a number of concerns which resulted in tabling of the application. Those concerns include: The visual appearance of the proposed building. The proposed storage of boats displayed for sale within the lakcshore yard adjacent to the proposed building and in an area proposed as non-hardcover. The lack of adequate parking to meet the letter of the code. The lack of public restroom facilities for use by slip customers. The lack of a boat head pumpout facility. The fact that this property has never connected to the available municipal sewer. The need to upgrade stonn water facilities as part of this overall proposal. The general intensification of use of the site. Revised Proposal Applicants have submitted a revised proposal including the following: - Increasing the proposed building length from 46' to 48 ’, resulting in a proposed lakeshore setback of 47* (existing building is 20' from the shoreline, 75' required). Proposed 15* side setback meets 10' minimum. Proposed street setback of 17' where existing building is 12’ and required is 30'. Revised facades and roof lines to create a more residential looking building. “ Provision of men's and women's restrooms for use by slip customers, within the east end of the building. - Proposed enclosure for continued use of satellite portable toilets on the Tanager Lake side of the property. Provisions for sanitaiy head pumpout system and sewer connection. Proposed parking lot expansion of 3 stalls, with an alternate plan for 10 additional stalls. Detailed grading plans for stormwater ponding for both stall and 10 stall alternatives. Revised hardcover calculations. In addition, applicants have provided a detailed analysis of their proposed use of the site and their expectations for hov it will operate. Applicants have provided their position regarding parking needs for the 12 slips proposed to be used for boat display purposes. Applicants have also provided information regarding the hardcover trade-offs involved with both the 3 stall and 10 stall parking expansions as well as impacts on trees. Planning Commission is requested to review applicants' commentary as well as their application summaiy' table. Zoning File #2195 January 16, 1997 Page 3 Hardcovcr/Stormwater/Trce Removal Impacts The hardcover impacts of the proposed building under the 3 stall and 10 stall alternatives are summarized in the table below. These numbers do not include any hardcover which might occur as a result of displaying boats on the green space east of the proposed building. (East Side) SITE AREA EXISTING HARDCOVER PROPOSED HARDCOVER 3-STALL ALTL:-^s'ATE PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10-STALL ALTERNATE 0-75'69,044 s.f.23,854 s.f. (34.55%) 23,215 s.f. (33.62%) 25,630 s.f. (37.12%) 75-250’12,176 s.f.9,003 s.f. (73.94%) 8,916 s.f. (73.23%) 8,926 s.f. (73.31%) 'I he 10-staIl alternative results in a net 1,776 s f. increase in 0-75' hardcover, while the 3 stall alternative results in a 639 s.f. reduction. With either alternative, hardcover in the 75-250' zone is reduced bv about 80 s.f. Both the 3-stall and 10-stall alternatives include significant expansion of the small existing storm water pond in order to meet NURP standards. The area of the storm water pond is not considered hardcover, but will result in the conversion of green space to an open water pond. The increase in pond size will result in either case in the removal of 4-5 trees in 0-75' zone, and both proposed plans indicate 2 new replacement trees in the pond area as replacement. Planning Commission should consider whether additional vegetation replacement is required in this location. The NURP standards were adopted as part of Orono's Comprehensive Plan a few years ago. and are intended to provide for a high degree of phosphorus removal from storm water before it enters the lake, in addition to removing suspended particles and debris. The ultimate efficiency of NURP ponds is a function of their large size and permanent pool of standing water. The existing pond on the site does not meet NURP criteria, and functions merely to remove sediment and debris from storm water entering the lake. The City Engineer has suggested minor revisions to the grading plan for the proposed stormwater pond. Site Landscaping As indicated in November, the proposed site plan shows existing and proposed landscaping materials. Planning Commission should review the revised plans and determine whether additional landscaping is necessary. ■i L.. Zoning File #2195 January 16, 1997 Page 4 Sales Operation and Intensiflcation of Site Uses Boat sales is a permitted use in the B-2 zone, and has been since 1975. The 1989 parking lot expansion for this site was approved based on no retail sales occurring at the site. The expansion of parking to serve the currently proposed new retail sales use requires a number of variances. It is staffs position that parking lot expansion would be required if applicants were to merely remodel the existing building and commence a retail sales operation. Planning Commission should carefully weigh the intent of the code and applicants' analysis of parking needs, including whether expansion of the parking lot should occur at a 3-stall or 10-staIl level. Consideration should also be given to the potential enhancements to the site as well as to its operation as a result of this application. A new smaller building with more conforming setbacks and a more effective storm water control system, as well as the provision of sanitary facilities for all users of the site, are all positive improvements to the property. Yet, Planning Commission has raised the concern that providing additional parking spaces could lead to an intensificatioii of yse of the site. Certainly, it could be argued that if 10 additional parking spaces are provided and then the retail opei^tion disappears again, the property owner might use the enhanced parking as justification for expanding the number of slips. We cannot predict what the current or future owners of the property will do in the future. We can assume, however, that access to Lake Minnetonka will become more dear as the population of the metropolitan area increases. Issues for Discussion 1.Are the lot depth and lot arei variances justified by the historic and current use of this property as a marina? Does the extremely nonconforming location of the existing building provide suffici«< hardship justification to allow its replacement with a building that will be more conforming in location, even though variances are still required? Does Planning Commission have a concern regarding the use of green space between the new building and the lake, for boat display purposes? If this is a concern, how would the placement of those boats in required automobile parking stalls impact the site? 4.Is there any justification for granting a variance to the required number of parking stalls? Does Planning Commission agree with applicants' analysis of the parking code requirements? Sh.ould applicants be required to increase the parking lot by 3 stalls, by 10 stalls, or not at all? Does Planning Commission acknowledge the continued variance for parking stalls across the County Road from a portion of ihe slips they serve? I Zoning File #2195 Januarj' 16,1997 Page 5 5.Given the proposed decrease or increase in hardcover on the site (dependent on the level of parking lot expansion ultimately required), does Planning Commission feel there is adequate hardship jusufication for hardcover expansion if required? Does the expanded storm water ponding facility adequately mitigate any additional hardcover that will result from parking expansion? 6.If the variances needed for this project are not granted, applicants intend to remodel the existing building. However, the potential uses of that building are still limited by parking .cquiremcnts for various activities occurring at the marina. Is the proposed office/sales building, and proposed parking Int/storm water revisions, ultimately a better use of this site than simply remodeling the existing 2 story structure? 7.Does Planning Commission concur that the operational aspects of the applicants proposal should be incorporated as conditions of approval in the resolution if this project is approved? This would formalize both the applicants' intended use of the site and the City's basis for approval, which would be beneficial information for future site owners and/or City Councils... Staff Recommendation As noted in November, Planning Commission should consider whethei each of the proposed/requested variances is adequately supported and justified by hardships. Planning Commission should consider whether the alternative of not granting the variances results irt a lost opportunity to bring the site into some degree of greater conformity. Because Planning Commission has recommended denial of expanded parking on the west side of County Road 15, there obviously is greater pressure to accommodate parking needs on the east side. Planning Commission should address the following items in your recommendation: Lot area and depth variances. Variance for number of parking stalls, or requirement to expand parking lot by 3 stalls or 10 stalls. Continued variance for parking on opposite side of road from area served, l.akeshore setback variance for new building. Street setback variance for new building. 1 lardcovv ' variance. Variance to allow boat storage in required yard. Landscaping provisions. Confirmation of proposed amenities, i.e. sanitar>' fa' ilities for slip customers, screening and continued use of satellite toilets on the Tanager Lake side, provision of boat head pumpout facility, provision of storm water management facilities, replacement of trees, building facade and design, etc. Site operation proposal as a condition of approval. Any other specific conditions of approval Planning Commission feels are necessary. ( ; Zoning File #2195 January 16, 1995 Page 6 ■fi Options for Action 1. Recommend appro'^al. with specific conditions defined. 2. Table for further discussion or further information (give specific direction). 3. Recommend denial. 4. Other. This application as well as Planning Commission's recommendation for denial on the west side bluff removal/parking expansion, will be presented to the Council for action at their January 27th meeting. January 7, 1997 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Genmar I N O O S T R I n RE: Additional Information for Variance/Commercial Site Plan Review Genmar Industries. Inc./Minnetonka Boat Works 1449 Shoreline Drive Dear Mr. Gaffron: Genmar has revised its initial request related to the referenced property. These items were discussed with you during our meeting on December 18, 1996. In preparation for the upcoming January 21.1997, planning commission meeting. Genmar is providing the following information as an addendum to our initial submittals. The items are referenced as exhibits using the designations provided in your November 15,1996 memorandum to the planning commission. The items are as follows: • Letter of Request/Hardship Statement (including table) (Exhibits D and E) • Hardcover Calculation Worksheets (for two parking area options) (Exhibit F) NURP Calculations (new exhibit) Existing Condition Plan (3 - 24" x 36" copies and 1 -11” x 17" copy) (Exhibit H) Proposed Site Plan -10 Stall Grading, Storm Sewer, and Landscaping Plan (3 - 24 ” x 36” copies and 1 -11" x 17 ” copy, and 1 -11” x 17 ” copy each of an enlargement of the building area and parking area) (Exhibit I) Proposed Site Plan - 3 Stall Grading, Storm Sewer, and Landscaping Plan (3 24 ” X 36" copies and 1 -11” x 17" copy, and 1 -11” x 17 ” copy each of an enlargement of the building area and parking area) (Exhibit I) Proposed Building Perspective (Exhibit K) Plan View. Elevation Views, and Isometric View of the Proposed Building (Exhibit J) 6n 339-7600 Fax 612/337-1930 100 South 5th Stteel SuRe 2400 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 If you have any questions, please contact Mary McConnell at 337-1803 or me at 337-1859. Sincerely, E. Mej^Sy, P.E. Director, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs enclosures cc: Mary P. McConnell - Genmar I EXHIBIT D& E Exhibit 1 to Variance Appiication-Genmar Industries, Inc. Genmar proposes to remove the existing building at the property known as the Minnetonka Boatworks, 1449 Shoreline Drive, Oronc, Minnesota and replace it with a smaller building. Genmar also proposes to increase the number of parking stalls, provide sanitary facilities to the boating slip renters (restrooms and a pumpout system), construct an enclosure around the portable sanitary facilities on the Tanager Lake side, and increase the size of the present stormwater runoff basin to meet NURP standards. Existing Conditions. The current building occupies a building footprint of approximately 30 feet by 80 feet. It is a two-story building and is approximately 4000 square feet in size. The lakeward portion of the building is located approximately 20 feet from Lake Minnetonka, the portion of the building fronting on Highway 15 is located approximately 12 feet from the property line and the side of the building is located approximately 15 feet from the property line. The current building is authorized for storage and light boat maintenance. Genmar currently has 68 authorized parking spaces to accompany 111 rented marina slips and the building. Proposal 1. Building Dimensions and Setback. The proposed building is greatly reduced in size from the existing building. It will occupy a footprint approximately 24 feet by 48 feet with a roofed canopy at the entrance approximately 5 feet by 24 feet. The building will be one story and approximately 1,152 square feet. Because of the reduced size of the building, we will be able to improve the setback from the lake by 27 feet and from Highway 15 by 5 feet. We propose to place the new building on the current side setback. We have attached a copy of an artist ’s rendering of the exterior of the building which should replace the previously submitted sketch identified as Exijibit K in the city’s November 15, 1996 memorandum. The building will be served by the existing well on the property and existing city sewer connection. The existing building will be demolished prior to placement of the new building. The present building is equipped with a basement which is located under the western 1/3 of the building. The basement will be filled and existing utility connections appropriately routed to service the new building. The building will be a wood-framed structure designed and built by Lester Building Systems. The building will be built slab-on-grade, wood framed with sheetrocked walls, and equipped with a cedar lap siding exterior. The building layout along with side and end-elevaticn views, and an isometric view are provided and should replace the previously submitted Exhibit J. 2. Building and Site Use. The proposed building will be used for boat sales. It will have two offices, a storage room, reception area and a restroom. We have attached a preliminary fioorplan for the building. The maximum number of employees at the site at any time will be three; two salespersons and a receptionist. As shown on the building plan view, in addition to a restroom inside the building for employees/customers, the building will be equipped with two, disability-accessible restrooms (male and female) for use by the marina slip rental customers. The restrooms will be connected to the sanitary sewer and will be accessed from exterior doors on the east side of the building. These restrooms will replace the porta-potties adjacent to the parking lot which will be removed from the site. A sanitary cleanout will be located along the building to provide a discharge for a portable head cleanout system which will be utilized at the site for the slip rental customers. The portable sanitary facilities on the Tanager Lake side of the property will be improved by installing a wooden, 3-sided, 8-foot high enclosure around them which will shield them from view from County Road 15. This structure will be stained or painted a natural tone. Genmar will lease the site to a dealer to sell Genmar boat products and manage the marina. We are currently nego;.ating a lease with a dealer who has a major marina operation in the east metropolitan area. The dealer would sell boats and a small number of parts and manage the marina. Of the existing 111 slips on Minnetonka, the operator would use the twelve slips closest to the building for in-water boat displays. These slips would no longer be rental slips which would result in less activity at the site. We propose to increase the existing parking lot by 3 stalls (71 total stalls). We have also included information regarding a 10 stall increase (78 total stalls). As discussed in a later section, there is a traoeoff in hardcover for the increases in the number of stalls. The operator would display up to six boats on the property between the lake and the building in the area presently covered by the east end of the existing building. This area will be returned to green space. The boats would be stored on trailers. Alternatively, some of the additional parking stalls that would be added could be used for the display area. This is discussed in a later section. The operator does not intend to establish permanent facilities for the performance of oil changes, maintenance or other significant boat-service related functions on the property. The property is currently authorized for this activity. The operator may conduct some light boat prep to ready the boat for delivery such as light assemblyJ.e., installation of a rail, fly bridge or prop replacement. The operator will not be open on Sundays during the boating season. With the exception of the items listed above, the marina would continue to be operated as currently authorized. In the future, the property will not be utilized for winter storage of boats as it is currently used. Changes From the Previous Proposal This section identifies the modifications incorporated into this proposal from the previous proposal submitted October 25, 1996 (Application #2195). The modifications include: • Provision of sanitary facilities to serve boat slip customers. Thus, no variance to Section 10.41, Subd. 11(A) will be required. • Expansion of the parking lot on the east side of County Road 15 to either 71 or 78 parking stalls (addition of 3 or 10 stalls). Thus, no variance to Section 10.41, Subd. 8 will be required. This is further detailed in the next section. • As part of changes to the existing east side parking lot, the existing stormwater basin will be expanded to meet NURP standards. • The construction of the office has been changed from the original modular design to a wood frame building. • A portable head cleanout system will be integrated into the marina services. • An enclosure will be constructed around the porta-potties located west of County Road 15. The variances are described in the next section. Variances Required. 1. Setback (10.41 Subd 12(B) and 13(A)) Lake: The current building is located 20 feet from the lake. The proposed building would be 47 feet from the lake, a 27-foot improvement. This would still require a 28-foot variance from the 75-foot setback requirement. Frontvard : The current building is located 12 feet from the Highway 15 right-of-way. The proposed building would be 17 feet from the County Road 15 right-of- way, a 5-foot improvement. This would still require a 13-foot variance from the 30-foot setback requirement for front yard. 2. Hardcover (Section 10.41, Subd. 13(D)/1 0.56, Subd. 16(L)) The attached hardcover calculations (existing and proposed options), which replace the previously submitted calculations listed as Exhibit F, reflect the portion of the Genmar property located east of County Road 15. Due to this property’s uniqueness (shallow ots with County Road 15 bisecting the property), the green space retained on the west side (Tanager Lake) should be considered in any discussions pertaining to hardcover on the east side of the property. The portion of property on the west side (Tanager Lake 17,360 square feet of green space this entire property is green space. Genmar currently has a variance for hardcover in both the 0 -75 foot and 75-250 foot zones. The reduction in the size of the building would reduce the amount of hardcover by a total of 1,301 square feet. However, the addition of parking stalls to alleviate the need for a parking variance would increase hardcover. Parking The total number of parking spaces required under the ordinance based on the proposed project is 71 spaces; 61 spaces for the marina (6 spaces per 10 rented slips) and 11 spaces for the building (eight for the business and three for employee parking - 3 employees). The current site configuration (an updated existing conditions plan is provided to replace Exhibit H) provides 68 parking spaces so a variance for 3 spaces would be required if it is determined that the parking required for the retail operation will adequately serve the 12 in-water boat display slips. Genmar currently has 68 authorized parking spaces to accompany 111 marina slips and building. Based on the proposed project, we will be converting 12 boat rental slips to in-water boat display. These slips will be devoted to the sales operation orily, which will reduce the amount of parking required. This is so because the 12 slips will not be used for normal unrestricted boat access. Only two of these slips could ever be used at one time because all customers who test drive must be accompanied by a salesperson at the site. There will be a maximum of two working salespersons at the site at any time. Further, because the sales facility will be closed at 6:00 p.m. including Saturdays (normal business hours will be 9:00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and closed on Sundays, employee and boat sales customer parking will not be needed on evenings and on Sundays. Thus, the entire parking lot will be available to service the 99 rental slips during evenings and 2/3 of the weekend--the busiest time of the week. Consequently, It is our belief that the parking related to the sales function is adequately considered with the need for only 11 parking stalls to aodress the new use As indicated by Michael Gaffron ’s November 15,1996 memorandum to the planning commission, it is his opinion that the ordinance identifies parking requirements based on the number of slips without distinguishing use as boat display suggesting Genmar would need 18 parking stalls to address the new use at the site. Whjle the ordinance does not address slips used for rental as distinguished from storage or in-water display, it is clear that the ordinance contemplated unrestricted use of slips where the slip user would use the slip at any time of day or night. This is clearly not the c:^«e with the proposed 12 slips to be used as boat display as discussed above. Consequently, it is not appropriate to require 7 parking spaces for the 12 slips which would be used for in­ water boat display. To do so would result in requiring the facility to duplicate the parking requirements for boat-sales customers and rental slips even though the display slips would be totally devoted to the boat-sales customer for whom parking has already been provided. To duplicate the parking requirements vyould be an illogical reading of the ordinance. Ordinances can not address every situation so they at times need some logical interpretation as is the case here. Genmar has evaluated the expansion of the existing parking lot while considering hardcover requirements and the number of trees which would require removal. * Evaluated were the alternatives of increasing the lot by 3 stalls and 10 stalls. The grading plan, stormwater plan, and landscaping plan for each option are pro\^d^ to^ replace Exhibit I. It should be noted that the 10-stall option would meet Mr. Gaffron s initial version of the parking requirements or allow for the use of 7 stalls for boat display and provide for the 3 stalls necessary to alleviate a variance under Genmar s interpretation of the parking requirements. If the parking lot was increased by 3 stalls, the resulting increase in hardcu x ^ lot only) would be 450 s.f. in the 0 - 75 foot zone and 125 s.f. in the 75 - 250 foo* , . :s. This alternative would require the removal of two trees. The existing pond would be expanded and would result in the removal of 4 to 5 trees. It should be noted that the increase in size of the existing pond to meet NURP standards would require the removal of these trees even if the parking lot was not increased in size. If the parking lot was increased by 10 stalls, the resulting increase in hardcover (parking lot only) would be 865 s.f. in the 0 - 75 foot zone and 135 s.f. in the 75 - 250 foot zorie. This alternative would require the filling of the existing pond to allow for the increase in the lot and construction of a new stormwater retention pond. A total of 5 trees would require removal. It should be noted that the decrease in the size of the building would completely offset hardcover increases created by the 3 stall option and partially offset hardcove; increases for the 10 stail option. The comparisons to the existing conditions are provided in the attached Genmar Application Summary table (replaces Exhibit E). 3. Storage of Boats, Vehicles, Etc. Within Required Yard (Section 10.41, Subd. 9) A variance to this 1995 ordinance amendment is required because the parking lot extends into the required lawn areas (street and lake). 4. Variance to Required Lot Area (Section 10.41, Subd. 12 (B.1)) A variance to this section is required because the lot area of this tax parcel of property Is 1.86 acres. 5. Variance for Lot Width Perpendicular to Lakeshore (Section 10.41, Subd. 12(B3)) A variance to this section is required because the lot depth Is less than the required 200 feet. Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions. The property has been used as a commercial marina for over 45 years. The property is not deep enough to allow an expansion of the parking area thai; would meet the current ordinance parking requirements without resulting In significant overall hardcover increases. The majority of the property is located within the lakeshore protected area where no hardcover is allowed so essentially any developed use would require a hardcover variance. The existing building on the property is in need of repair. As an alternative to repairing the building, Genmar proposes to demolish the existing building and replace it with a substantially smaller building which will substai.tially diminish the size of the variances required and bring the property closer to conformance with current road and lake setbacks and hardcover requirements. Attached is a table comparing the current conditions with the proposed improvements This table clearly shows the significant improvements to the property in terms of compliance with current ordinance requirements and a reduction in use of the property. In addition, Genmar will be reducing the amount of marina traffic and the accompanying parking needs by converting twelve slips to in-water boat display and increasing the number of parking stalls. This reduction in rental slips reduces unrestricted marina activity at the site by over 10 percent. The use at the site will also be diminished because of the restricted business hours and the elimination of a permanent maintenance facility and winter boat storage. The addition of a sma!l sales office with only three employees with restricted business hours and reduced unrestricted marina activity will clearly deintensify the currently authorized use of the property. F.oaily, Genmar is also bringing the property more into conformance with the provision '!t sanitary facilities for boat slip rental customers (including pumpout facilities) and upgrading stormwater retention structures to meet NURP standards. Presently, approximately 77.1% of the entire property is green space. The proposals by Genmar would only slightly decrease the amount of green space; 76.7% total green spa^“ if the 3 stall increase is constructed and 76.4% green space for the 10 stall increase. Building Setback Lake Side Front ■T Marina GENMAR Application SummaryCurrent Conditions Old In Need of Repair 30x80 2slory 4200 square feet 20 feet -•^fcel 12<eel OM*•cnProposed-I New 24x48 1 story 1152 square feet M Of• • s Ob »o 47 feet 15 feet 17 feet o> C* s Slips 111 Rental slips 99 Rental slips ow 12 in-water boat display slips Hardcover 3 Parking Stalls 10 Parking Stalls • 0-75 feet zone 23,854 square feet 23,215 square feel 25,630 square feet ••• 75-250 feet zone 9,003 square feet 8,916 square feel 8.926 square feet • •• Stormwater Does not meet NURP • Compliance with NURP S.in.tdry Facilities Porta-potties cn bo*h Restrooms installed in sides of County Road 15 proposed bui ding. Shield installed around porta- potties west of Co. Rd. 15. • 0 SI 12/31/96 07:34 10 ^blLTNCREASe NO. 816 0Q4 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION : ORONO, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 30. 1996 EXHIBIT F PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY ; SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC, NOTE : ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING I SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION ; EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 2 (10 ^^LLS^ SETBACK ZONE : [0-751 75-250’250-500 ’500-1000 ’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) BUILDING PARKING LOT BOAT WELL DOCKS EXISTING POND 1,585 SF 21.300 SF 625 SF 344 SF 0 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75’) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = 23.854 SF 69.044 SF 34.55% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION ; EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 2 SETBACK ZONE : I 0-751 75-250’250-500 ’500-1000 ’ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) BUILDING ___________ PARKING LOT ___________ BOAT WELL ___________ DOCKS ___________ POND ___________ SQUARE FEET (SF) 496 SF 24.165 SF 625 SF 344 SF 0 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) ^25.630 SF TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75’) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = 69.044 SF 37.12% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION 12/31/96 07:34 NO. 816 005 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION : ORONO, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 30. 1996 PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY : SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. NOTE : ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION : EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 2 ('lo stalls) SETBACK ZONE :0-75 ’ I 75-2501 250-500'500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) BUILDING PARKING LOT TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250') = 820 SF, 8,183 SF 9,003 SF TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250*) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250 ) = 12,176 SF 73.94% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION : EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 2 SETBACK ZONE: 0-75' I 75-250< 250-500' 500-1000' PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE SQUARE LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = FEET (SF)HARDCOVER ITEM BUILDING PARKING LOT 608 SF 8,318 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250’) = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250') = 8,926 SF 12,176 SF 73.31% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION i 12/31/96 07:35 'J ^TALL THCREA^E NO. 816 EXHIBIT F C)06 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION : ORONO, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 30. 1996 PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY : SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC, NOTE : ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION : EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 3 (3 mws) t SETBACK ZONE : I oTsl 75-250’250-500’500-1000’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH IFT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) BUILDING PARKING LOT BOAT WELL DOCKS EXISTING POND 1,585 SF 21,300 SF 625 SF 344 SF 0 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75') = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75*) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = 23,854 SF 69.044 SF 34.55% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION : EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 3 SETBACK ZONE ; I 0-751 75-250’250-500’500-1000’ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH ^FT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) BUILDING PARKING LOT BOAT WELL DOCKS POND 496 SF 21,750 SF 625 SF 344 SF OSF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) =23,215 SF TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75') = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = 69,044 SF 33.62% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION 12/31/^96 07:35 NO. 816 007 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS DECEMBER 30. 1996 LOCATION : ORONO, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY : SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. NOTE : ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15-ALTERNATE 3 (3 SETBACK ZONE: 0-75' i 75-2501 250-500’ 500-1000’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE SQUARE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = FEET (SF) BUILDING ____________ _________ 820 SF. PARKING LOT ___________ _________ 8.183 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250’) « 9,003 SF TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250’) = 12,176 SF PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250’) = 73.94% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION : EAST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 - ALTERNATE 3 SETBACK ZONE: 0-75’ j 75-250j 250-500’ 500-1000’’ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE SQUARE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = FEET (SF) mm mm ^m mrnmmm mm mm mm ^m mm ^mmm mmtmm mm ^m^m ^mmm mm ^m ^mmmm^m mm ^m ^mm mm^m ^m ^m ^m w mm ^m mmm mm mm mm mmm^mmm^^m mm mm ^m ^m m^m ^mmm* BUILDING ___________ _________ 608 SF PARKING LOT___________ ____________ 8.308 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250’) = 8.916 SF TOrU PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250) = 12,176 SF PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250 ) = 73.23% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION liU. lOO iy\j£. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. NEW EXHIBIT A-A 150 SOUTH BROADWAY (612) 476-6000 WAYZATA. MN 55391 FAX 476-0104 i PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION: ORONO. MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY : SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC DATE : DECEMBER 12.1996 NURP POND DESIGN (^/^-CTAIL P = Aw = Building & Boat Display Area = ParlUng & Boat Well Area = Ponding & Water Area = Total Hardcover Area = Grasscover = Hardcover For FI = CN = Fi = 1 pi MO 2.5 "Storm 1.73 Acres 3174 sf 30380 sf 2166 sf » m « CN 35720 0.62 Acres 0.91 Acres 0.75 Acres 90 70 79 0.43 \ICN -10 •-2.58 R = R = PFI*(P-.2S)(P-.2S)(1-Fi)/(P4'.0S) 1.57 V =RAw/12 =0.23 Acre-Feet REQUIRED PONDING DEAD STORAGE VOLUME - PROPOSED PONDING AREA Contour 923.4 BOTTOM 924 925 926 927 928 929 929 4 NWL Square Feet 0 600 1000 1300 1600 2500 3200 3600 Cummulative Storage(CF) 0 180 980 2130 3680 5830 8680 10040 NWL (Aae-Feet) C 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.13 0 20 0 23 DEAD STORAGE / POND SURFACE AREA 2.79 1 f jjuuljl/7M ^ f * ^« % £ rn CD >>CO ''/iw. i:^4i o=• v,jrnm ■ui m P roposed :'a^ EXISTING building SU/LD/N^ w uj -s; fo >f 2 .v!; O •^7 Coc Jb. r9j> o C^7 vV ^ ^ ____ M TJ CD > a 4')i r^' §■ m 'Ati 'v '*'j /• ^ .^Vv r- "ifj/ ®04 j- 6^. oo§§§ooli§ii“Sill llfflp!mm'm o n V o. Vi ..V ?>V Oj '€ .-V /,Mj Z''V Cv ir' -' i. 7/r ^r 0*^ /1>- • *: ■•^<v;,. ■.V'7: .v.*:*V ' > .i*r N. V':?:•rw.^';r. 5^f^ —S5S»^i-V' /' ‘ V,' J-v'-'x • X.'T.'T^ /;i .1’fef^' g=c,'''.K? immm i J'j: Jv^ ii vL" mM 3S®t^§m I :illlilllifflimililiiiirrSS i:SiS^«: 3V •v/c/' w>: '\ y -iliilK-f L ‘ * -'liV—— —•! 'g!i -.rV I «.» »iMi»; .1 fi V.. /J :«' :?;■ HI . uriniti:r «ii*«* i im m » g.; .iH|g >CT9iry^sai 11mW9 ■■vlt! '^‘f/ . r'ST" '^* m j:r .f •n- ---*' * Tjf-i;. ' 'I t>^r.' • .' */f US!>7 3'ft 1 i• I' '■’^' . ^ V ' ■ '■ 2-i -Vi — % .* ■ • » •'7,* r..? ‘4^ ^. /j .Vj^V' *1 W V r^T'-Vv*:* ••.^‘Ji^V >V- V / ), : .il,r ;• T ’• I 'lV V' * • y r'..' 7/- '■- J /. I ^XiT', • V T V: f-¥ .*•' «a I7^‘*?:r • -V.S -:%., • ' • -'w » ’ • *. ‘V“*’•%• I ' I :»I '' • • gi^S' .V: '5ff< - • ■' '■ i‘'.Pv?rvir.*1 =^ i . . .. :, .••.• • ■ • . •'••• • ' ■ . ■• .• • •■•..• •. .*• • ■ • • .»• .•.:•■•.•;• •.■• • ■■.. . • ■ ;•* • *•’ *• •• •••* . ^ • •.* . *. .' •* > ’. •*. * '•. . . .. ' * • • * * * • ^ » V mi V If y ' •*. • * / •v ■. . , • • • . sfl!■ :. 'S' [»vf> • !i I, ■ * • ms-T- '< i\ ■-. .... •'•. .• •' •. % 'W?.SJ'ifem- mw^m AfeMs mISfily-''^ ■im few.pmi'j#vV«' ? V. '.^ 'i>r i^ip mmm • • • • • K- 4*- »' .•f y • • \ *<w. * ^ i'”?J%:r — n"'-l "■ '^v.c£ : lA . iiiliLrt ____ ■.\-’- .■••• v-r'-.--. • . • » •• • i. —•% ♦••• ••• • •• j* ' :•:4 0 •.*4 I ’- • • •• •• ' > • V . . ? •vr. • t • • •••*' . ••' *.. . V ; **' *■-. ‘‘ ; • • < « . • 4 • ‘ * •.. ‘ ‘ S‘ . •• ^ •“• ■'■ .. * % V • . ' 4 .* «. '• • . . • ' % mXX OB H £-h "nr0 V b--- n n r ri < Iff' ?< 0 ■n3 otn Iff' • 1(5^ 0-n•n nm \ / W . r~o / Iff tP cn CLOS. CC □n qP, r «« ^ t -■> \W H 7io Z nrm < Z -ii 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 \ (#9 - #21^ David Alan Sutherland - Continued) Mabusth repohed that the plat map indicates the lot to be 7,000 s.f. in size. The applicant is proposing conb<mction of a partial second level over the single story residence. The existing single stalPgarage is located 3’ from the residence. The application does not require any structurar^verage variance. The residence is located in the 500-1000' setback area allowing hardcover. There will be no change to the hardcover which exists at 28.26%. SetbaclN^^iances are required due to the location of the existing structure at 18' side setback aqd 29' rear setback. The be^<5om expansion results in an intensification requiring to wrapHhe existing variances^/Mabusth indicated that she has not received any comments after noti^tion from the Accent neighbors. A neighbor did request a copy of the application. The applicant had no additional comment^ Smith was informed that the construQtion woulbsbe contracted out. There were no public commen^ The applicant plans to copaplete the second story construction in about four years which will require a new perroiL The applicant informed Berg thatH|^ currently proposed improvement will be^mpleted within the one year time limit aHovved. It was noted that there were severakevergreens to the east and south of the proposedconstruction which will be lost. Tfi^pplicant informed Smith that it was his intent to ao^more landscaping and trees aerws the back and side of the property. McMitt^ moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2194 for side anfr^-ear ^ejh^k variances. Vote: AyesJ^Nays H (#10) #2195 GENMAR INDUSTRIES, INC, 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE - COMMERCIAL SITE PLANA^ARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:58-10:51 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was represented by Mary McConnell and Jeff Melby. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18. 1996 (#10 - #2195 Genmar Industries - Continued) Gaffron reported that the application is for a commercial site plan review and variances for a property in the B-2 lakeshore district which has been operated by Minnetonka Boat Works. The applicant plans to replace the existing 30'x80’ building with a smaller 24'x40' building. The property will be leased to King's Cove Marina based out of Hastings. Variances requested are for lakeshore setback, requiring 75' and proposed at 49'; and street setback requiring 30’, existing at 12', and proposed at 17'. The required side setback is 10' and is proposed at 15'. The plan calls for a grassy area to the lake side of the new building to be used for boat sales and display purposes. Park and hardcover variances are also needed, in addition to lot area, lot depth, lack of sanitary facilities and boat storage vanances. The existing building has been used for storage. Retail sales occurred on the property in the past but the current parking does not accommodate retail sales. There are no changes planned for the parking lot. Any alternative use of parking stalls would require a variance. Gaffron indicated that there seems to be an over usage of the site. He noted that it could be argued that the proposed use of the grassy area might convert it to hardcover at some point due to the heavy pedestrian traffic. In reviewing the parking, Gaffron indicated that the code requires 6 stalls for every 10 boat slips. The property currently has 68 parking stalls for its 111 slips. Additional parking spaces are needed for the planned uses, as well as three spaces for the employees, for a total of 78. Gaffron reported that the applicant proposes 12 slips currently used for rental to be converted to use for display of boats for sale, which the applicant considers would bring the parking requirement to 71. The code, however, does not differentiate between the two uses resulting in a 10 stall variance required to accontmodate the retail sales. Also, if the green space is not used for display, and display boats are placed on the parking lot, then additional spaces would be required. There has also been a tendency to park the overflow on weekends at a neighboi .ng marina. Gafl'ron said the use could be limited to include no weekends or holidays. Gaffron said the applicant has agreed to close the sales operation on Sundays except for four Sundays per year chosen by the applicant. Gaffron noted that the slips on the west side of the road have been serv ed by parking on the east side of the road through a variance granted in 1989. Gaffron revie ..ed the hardcover calculations for the property on the east side of the road. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback currently exists at 36.9% and is proposed to decrease to 35.4%, but noting that the green space will be used for storage, which is not included in this calculation. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback exists at 73.9% and is proposed to decrease to 72.2%. The overall result in both zones is a 1300 s.f hardcover reduction. 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Genmar Industries - Continued) Gafiron reported that there is a lack of sanitar>' facilities on the property. Portable toilets have been used but no indoor facilities provided for slip customers as required by code. Sewer was brought to this area in the mid 1980's and is available to this property. GaflGron recommended that this issue be addressed. The City required a pond in 1989 for stormwater management, and the parking lot discharges to that pond. The City Engineer has not reviewed the pond. GafFron indicated that the pond probably functions as planned but without meeting current codes. He added that the site plan calls for additional plantings on the property noting that the current landscaping has met City approval. Gaffron indicated that there has been a long standing discrepancy beKveen the comprehensive plan and the zoning code regarding boat sales. The comp plan says that boat sales are not an appropriate use for the B-2 district. The zoning code has allowed boat sales as a permitted use since 1975. The legislature changed its view on the hierarchy in 1974 stipulating that the comprehensive plan takes precedence over the zoning code. Gafiron noted that all of the other Orono marinas have had changes but have continued to have retail use which requires more parking. The applicant was asked to respond. McConnell addressed the concerns brought forward by Gafiron. She noted that the large building has not been fully utilized. The applicant reviewed whether minor repairs should take place or whether a more viable use would be to minimize the size of the building with a new building. The building as proposed was said to be environmentally friendly with no use of chemicals and contain only office space with two sales people and one secretary. With regard to the green space losing its pervious ability, McConnell said the boats would be on traders and would not aflect the drainage. She noted that the applicant had considered asphalt in that area. McConnell said 12 slips would be used for water display of boats. King ’s Cove would store the boats in those slips for test driving by customers for retail sales with rental sUps provided by other stalls. McConnell viewed the lack of separating the retail and rental staUs as "double dipping". It was her opinion that only a 3 stall variance would be required for parking. She noted that the applicant was willing to close on Sundays with the exception of four Sundays per year. As to the parking conflict between the two marinas, McConnell recognized the problem as being in the past but improvements have generated more parking on the Genmar site. NflNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Germar it;iustries - Continued) McConnell informed the vCcmmission that they have never /Vceived any complaints regarding the use of "Satellites" for sanitary facilities. She indicated that the office will be served by sanitary sewer but only for use by the employees. Customers will not be allowed past a certain point in the office building, and it will be closed on Sundays. McConnell said to accommodate sanitary facilities for all customers, it would have required a larger building built toward the lake side. McConnell noted that the property has historically been used as a marina, for storage, and for retail and views the proposal as an improvement to the property. Lindquist opened the meeting to public comment. Doug Schmitt, 1475 Shoreline Drive, reported that he lives next door but across the channel from the property. He inquired if there was a difficulty in connecting to sewer. Gaffron said the property is served by sewer now noting a nearby injector station. Gaffion said connecting to sewer is not an issue noting that the sew er assessment has been paid. Lou Oberhauser indicated he was representing a neighboring property owner. He asked what would prevent the applicant from entering the rental business in relation to the slips available. Gaffron reported that there are specific uses allowed by conditional use permit that require parking stalls. He cited examples of boat clubs, launching facilities, transient launching, charter boat port of call and caretaker houses. Permitted uses under the code include slip rental, marine sales, repair, storage, and marine fuel sales. Gaffron noted that without a review, the rental situation could happen. McConnell indicated that it was not the applicant's intent of renting any boats and noted that such a condition could be stipulated. Oberhauser said he was concerned with an increase in the commercialization of the area and intensification in use not in keeping with the residential area. It was clarified for Smith that Genmar owms the property and would lease the facilities to King’s Cove for use as a marina and office space. Hawn asked for clarification on extended parking granted in the 1980's. Gaffron said the variance was granted with the understandmg that the number of spaces did not include retail, and no retail was proposed at that time. McMillan asked for comment on what minor repairs would be required to the existing building. She said the building looks as if it would require major repair. McConnell said the building was in good structural condition and felt the building could be usable with only minor repair. I i MINUTES OF '^HE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Genmar Industries - Continued) Smith inquired about how the 78 parking stall configuration was derived. Gaffron said he did not believe the existing parking could be reconfigured to meet the 78 stall requirement. McMillan inquired about the sales hours for the business. The owner of King's Cove said the office would be open from 9:00 a m. to 5:00 or 6:00 p.m., Monday thru Saturday, all year around. McMillan asked how the applicant proposes to keep the slip rental customers from using the sanitary facilities within the building. McConnell said the building plans situate the receptionist area so that the facilities would not be available. She said the applicant proposes to keep the current satellite toilets in the same area as they have in the past. McMillan was informed that the satellites have not been screened in the.past. Berg asked the applicant what type of construction would be used for the building. Melby said the structure would be a double wide manufactured modular. McConnell said improvements would be added to the building such as shutters, different roofing, and awning. Lindquist asked if there was any requirement that the property hook up to sewer. Gaffron said the code was fairly specific and read the requirements including providing for sewer and water, waste dump station and pump out Gaffron indicated that these issues were not discussed in 1989 review. Lindquist asked if a boat pump out w as planned. McConnell said no. Gaffron said the pump out was previously provided at the Genmaris VVayzata facility which has now been sold. Lindquist asked if there was any problem With providing a pump out. McConnell said she would look into this possibility. Lindquist asked if there were other code requirements that were not being met. Gafiron said no CUP is required as the proposal does not include any of the uses which require a CUP. He noted that additional parking was allowed on the Brown’s Bay side in 19S9 to serve the slips on Tanager Lake across the County road. From a landscape standpoint, Gaffron said there were no problems Gaffron said the property is in general compliance and has been a low activity property. He noted that the previous boat storage in the winter was maintained at a low level. McConnell said winter storage is no longer being provided. Lindquist inquired about the 8-10 parking stall shortage. He noted that the code is specific as to the number required and does not discern the type of use. McConnell said she understood the code to be concerned with high turnover noting that the proposal calls for retail customer, not rental slips. Lindquist informed McConnell that slips are required for both retail and rental. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Genmar Industries - Continued) Mabusth clarified through questioning McConnell that the rental slip customers will not have access to sanitar>' facilities when the boat sales office is closed. She asked the Commission whether the new use should be allowed if no permanent sanitar>’ facilities are available and in light of the closing of the Wayzata facility. The boat slips will continue to be used on Sundays when the office facility is closed. McConnell said the use of the bathroom facility within the building would not affect any customer as the facility is not open for use at all. Smith noted that marinas provide such sanitary' facilities for their customers. McMillan asked if there were any other changes for the boat slip customers. The only other change noted was the lack of providing winter storage, which McConr.cll said would result in less activity on the site. Smith questioned the grass area becoming more like hardcover rather than a permeable source for drainage with heavy pedestrian use. McConnell agreed the grass w'ould mat but said she did r.ot expect alot of activity but saw the display as v'isual. No walking stones will be laid. Smith asked how the stormwater facilities would be positioned on the property. McConnell said the requirements would have to be reviewed with the plans. She also indicated that additional parking stalls may be found if the existing pond is moved elsewhere. Berg inquired whether the applicant intended on maintaining facilities in Hastings. King's Cove owner said he did. The Commission and applicant discussed the number of slips and stalls comparing retail and rental. McMillan said she was concerned with the intensification of the site. She also noted that the site would generate more traffic into an area that is already overburdened with traffic. McMillan also questioned what would result if the property were sold if the applicant was allowed to dift'erentiate between rental and retail slips. McMillan said she saw the old building as being part of the history of old Orono. Wffiile acknowledging the applicant had the right to build, she did not see the proposed building as fitting in with the new Orono. Hawn agreed that the proposal was an intensification of the site. Noting the plan for a double wide mobile, no public toilet facilities, Hawn questioned how the applicant could ask the City to e.xtend the limits of the code while not offering anything back to :he customer. Hawn said she w'ould like to see toilet icilities and an attractive building. Her major concern was with the density of the site. Hawn said she was not in favor of the application as presented. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Geninar Industries - Coniinued) Lindquist said the application as he saw it calls for a 10 stall variance to the parking code. Lindquist said he would not differentiate between the uses. Lindquist said the facility should provide toilets and pump out. Smith agreed. He noted he did like the green area. Berg said the old building showed a character not present with the new building proposed. Lindquist asked the applicant if the application should be tabled for further review or if a vote should be taken. McConnell asked for additional comments before tabling. Hawn said she would be interested in viewing the City Engineer’s report on the pond to see if it was adequate to meet the current standards. Lindquist noted that the proposal should meet the ordinance changes made in 1995. Mr. Schmitt asked if there were any building codes that must be met. Gaffron said the building must meet the B-2 standards, but those standards do not discuss how the building should look. Berg said she traveled the road daily and is concerned with the traffic and number of people using the facility on the narrow, busy roadway. She saw the site as being the entrance into Orono and said she was adamant that the building be a good representation of Orono. Berg cited a nearby example of a remodeled building that the proposal should emulate. Gaffron indicated there were licensing standards that are required to be met. He noted» that the property has been open during the winter and summer to include storage and asked if there was further intent to add storage. McConnell said the applicant had looked at that possibility, but it was not their intent to provide for storage at this time but possibly in the future. Smith moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2195 to allow for further review. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The application will be reviewed at the January, 1997 meeting. (#11) #2196 GENMAR INDUSTRIES, INC., 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITA^ARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 10:51-11:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. c I f / <5* ^/fe- . / CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2195 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: November 26, 1996 TO:Genmar Industries, Inc. 100 South 5th Street Suite 2400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn; Mary P. McConnell COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 11/18/96 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled in order that applicant be allowed an opportunity to make revisions to the proposed site plan. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 21, 1997; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are Available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Because there is no Planning Commission meeting scheduled until January 21, 1997 and because the normal 60-day application review period will expire on January 25, 1997 which date would be prior to the next scheduled City Council meeting, the review period is hereby extended to February 12, 1997. J I L. htu-*n OBERHAUSER & NEVEAUX APARIMRSHIP Of PROfESSIONAl CORPORATIONS AirORSlYS ASD COUNSHORS AT LAW 1421 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD - SUITE 210 WAY7ATA, MINNESOTA 55391 5 LOUIS B. OBERHAUSER’ lACK NEVEAUX* M ! Tofesitoml AisocMfon (612)473-2521 FAX (612)473-7863 BACKUP FAX (612) 473-0265 December 2, 1996 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ladies and Gentlemen: I represent a residential property owner in the vicinity of the Genmar Industries, Inc.'s Marina. For personal reasons my client would like his identity to be kept confidential. My client is concerned that in the past this marina has been given variances which has resulted in more traffic and more hard cover and land destruction than allowed by the zoning laws. My client sees no reason for the City of Orono ("City") to grant any variance as it relates to hard cover, destruction of protected property, or the number of parking spaces. Also, the suggested building, if constructed, should be a permanent structure which provides for the marina customer as well as the employees and the marina should provide for proper disposal of the waste products from the boats kept at the marina. To even suggest the continuation of the outdoor toilets as a viable alternative, causes me to question the applicant's motives. Would you please put me on the mailing list for future information regarding these two requested variances. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely yoqrs, LBO/ejw LOU I OBERHAUSER-IS/Bc: i BONESTROO AND ASSOCIATES Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 16, 1907 ^ 612 6361311 01/16/97 10:00 0 :02/02 NO:239 nvivn,\ «i./Ati.nMf/*. hu is f./i.f .‘' r. • •♦S*' »* o»»»i i'. i.-i .M.f. n I f « k.^.h•f^1^ Ufts, t ri •(•iffM*' » ..( * »| • rii.'iiT^v t ^ l»h # kviy A • koJiri! r*»r.fiir TT .iiljtit M Sr‘»»ir.» \ r»*.,jii.m# /'rirn H.iw uJA S«5nroul PC • Kt* P'V A ij.-.i lr.ti P'riN i»* • W ►mirr •m.vmIo i.i mh.. if • PuUt-.r c ^ a, a . m .rn a rn.u .»• i»f • T II tfk • hsl ► »iH I «'•!* r‘1 • Vnk V v.vr*. • r U'* r| I V • I* 'r-t ■? ' ►.*!♦,*^\rn r JfYur*. *il R'ji ftr^r* I »A nn*} \| ( «i*»iil VN • \JU E % ♦ Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. A.sst. Building and Zoning Adminislralor City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Ciystal Bay, Minnesota .‘'.i323 Rc: Gcnmar File No. 1.30-2195 H «r#*r ‘ /-/u-n /•*. /• : »‘*r> ♦ ^ Dear Mike. Wc have rcvjeweci the grading plans for the proposed NURP ponds for Gcnmar (Minnetonka Boalwurks). The two pond designs submilled are based on expanding the existing parking lot by either three or ten parking stalls. Both poiul designs meet NURP criteria and are accepiuhle from an engineering standpoint .Storm sewer inlet inverts should be set at the NWL (929.40) for both ponds. The inven ot the existing outlet pipe should be extended to 928.0 on the pond side for the three .stall design to provide skimming of fioatables and debris The grading plan should be revised to .show a drainage swale near the pond oiitlei pipe set at the pond HWI, (930 8). The .south end of the parking lot should Ixj rai.scd to an elevation of 9.31 .3 to prevent water from ponding in the parking area. Please contact me at this office it you have any ejuestions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDhRUK it ASSOCIATES. INC. .Shawn D. Gustafson. P.F.. 2J35 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, IVIIM 55113-3898 • 612*636-4600 / To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Conunission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator November 15, 1996 #2195 Genmar Industries, Inc./Minnetonka Boat Works, 1449 Shoreline Drive Boulevard - Variance/Commercial Site Plan Review - Public Hearing Zoning District: B-2, Lakeshore Business District Application: Request for commercial site plan review approval and variances for construction of a new building to replace the existing building on the property. The proposal requires variances for lakeshore and street (front yard) setbacks, 0-75' and 75- 250’ hardcover, and a variance to the number of required parking stalls, and a number of additional variances as noted below. List of Exhibits A - Application B C D E F G H I J K L M N Plat Map Property 0^v•ners List Letter of Request/Hardship Statement Applicant's Summary of Request (Table) Applicant's Hardcover Calculation Worksheet 1985 Survey 1996 Existing Conditions 1996 Proposed Site Plan Proposed Building Plans Proposed Building Perspective Resolution No. 2638 (5/22/89) Comprehensive Plan Excerpt: Lakeshore Commercia’ Land Use B-2 Zoning Code Section 'i '' . ^ Background/Summary of Request A marina has been operated at this site for at least five decades and perhaps much longer. Minnetonka Boat Works began operating at this location in 1955. The City has been licensing this operation since 1962. The existing 30' x 80 ’ building likewise has existed for many decades. Use of the building in the 1970's and earlier included retail sales and service. By the late 1980's the retail use had ceased, and the building was used for winter service work, storage, and a caretaker apartment existed in the second floor. The building in recent years has been used mainly for storage. Zoning File #2195 November 15, 1996 Page 2 Applicant proposes to replace the existing building v^ith a new 24' x 46' one story boat sales office. Slip rental and boat sales would be operated from this building by King's Cove, who will be leasing the site. Site Plan Review Please refer to Exhibit I, the proposed site plan, as well as Exhibit D, the applicant's letter of request. The applicant has requested the following: 1. Section 10.41, Subd. 4 - Commercial site plan review in order to obtain a building permit. 2. 3. 4. 5. Section 10.41, Subd. 8 - Variance to parking requirements. Section 10.41, Subd. 12 (B) - Front yard setback variance. Section 10.41, Subd. 13 (A) - Lakeshore setback variance for building. Section 10.41, Subd. 13 (D)/10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover variance. In addition, staff has identified the following as issues requiring variance consideratiori: 1.Section 10.41, Subd. 9 - Variance to allow storage of boats, etc. within required yard (B-2 required yards are Lakeshore: 75' Side: 10' Street: 30'). 2.Section 10.41, Subd. 11 (A) - Variance for lack of sanitary facilities to serve slip customers. s/ 3.Section 10.41, Subd. 12 (B.l) - Required lot area = 2 acres; existing lot area (east of County Road 15) = 1.86 acres; total site area = 3.29 acres; property exists as two tax parcels. 4. Section 10.41, Subd. 12 (B-3) - Variance for "lot width perpendicular to lakeshore" (lot depth) less than the required 200'. A number of additional variances were granted for the existing parking lot when it was expanded in 1989, including the following: Zoning File #2195 November 15, 1996 Page 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Section 10.41, Subd. 8 (E) - Parking spaces separated by public roadway from the dock they are designed to serve. Section 10.41, Subd. 8 (G) - Parking within required yard or landscape area. Tree removal within 75' of the shoreline. 0-75' and 75-250' hardcover variances for parking lot. Variance to 75' lakeshore setback for parking areas. Setbacks for Proposed Building The proposed building will be within the footprint of the existing building. Existing and proposed setbacks are as follows: Building Setbacks: Existing Building Proposed Buildinc Required Variangg Lake 20'49 ’75’26' North Side 15'15 ’10' Front (street)12 ’17 ’30 ’13' Because the existing lot depth at the location of the building is only 115', it is impossible to meet the 75' lake setback and 30' required street setback without a variance. The proposal provides additional setback from the street with an increase in open space of 5. The side of the building facing the street will have windows but no doors, hence that landscape/yard area will have no traffic, but according to the drawings provided will contain a sign identifying the site. The increase in lakeshore setback from 20' to 49' is a positive improvement to the property. While applicants intend to turn that 49' into green lawn area, they also propose to use that lawn area for displaying boats for sale in the summer (See below). Exhibit I indicates some additional 2' high shrubs for landscaping around the east and west sides of the building. Use of the Lakeshore Yard for Boat Storage Applicants propose to use the 49' lawn area east of the new building for storage of up to 6 boats for sale during the summer months. This use and the potential pedestrian traffic it Zoning File #2195 November 15, 1996 Page 4 generates may work at cross purposes to maintaining a green open space within the lakeshore yard. The alternative is to devote additional parking spaces for storage of boats for sale, which will eliminate needed parking on the site but will allow the green space to serve its purpose. Clearly, the need for this variance results from the lack of space on the site to accommodate the existing and proposed uses within the constraints of the code, i.e. the site is overused. Most of these constraints relate to the physical layout of the site. Staff would conclude that although boat storage has historically occurred within 75' of the lake on the parking lots at this site, new boat storage in a space formerly occupied by a building and now proposed to be credited as non-hardcover is not allowed by code hanece a variance is necessa*7 for this to occur. Parking The code requires 6 parking stalls for each 10 boat slips on water or on land. The site currently contains 68 stalls to service 111 slips. With the new'ly proposed sales function, an additional 8 spaces are required, plus 3 for employees. The total required number of spaces is (.6 X 111) + 8 + 3 = 78 parking stalls required, with only 68 available. However, applicants propose that 12 of the 111 slips be converted to in-water boat display, which applicants then suggest no longer should be counted in the slip parking requirement. Under their calculation, the required parking then becomes (.6 x 99) + 8 + 3 = 71 spaces. Because the current configuration only provides 68 spaces, they request a variance for 3 Spaces. The code does not discern between slips used for rental purposes and slips used for display of boats for sale. It is staffs opinion that a 10-stall variance is needed. If the proposed boat display area was moved into the parking lot, it would likely reduce parking by another 8 spaces, leaving only 60 spaces and a variance of 18 spaces. This site has a potential on busy weekends for overflowing its parking facilities. The natural tendency would then be to park in any spaces remaining in the Windward Marina lot, which has its overflow' parking in the residentially-zoned parcel to the north of the service building. One way to minimize the potential parking problems would be to limit the sales function to non-weekend/non-holiday days. Applicants have indicated that the sales ftmetion will occur on Saturdays, but will agree to being closed on all but 4 Sunday's per year, to be determined by King's Cove. Applicants have proposed the construction of 28 additional parking stalls on the west side of County Road 15 (see Application #2196) which would eliminate a variance for number of stalls, but would still require a variance to the requirement that parking serv'e uses on the same Zoning File m95 November 15, 1996 Page 5 side of the road as the parking. While this additional parking area adjacent to Tanager Lake would clearly benefit slip customers who now must walk (dash) across County Road 15, the impacts of creating that parking lot may be significant. Hardcover Applicants have provided hardcover calculations separately for the east and west side of County Road 15. The property east of County Road 15 contains 81,220 s.f., of which 69,044 s.f. is in the 0-75' setback zone. Existing 0-75' hardcover is 36.9%. Proposed 0-75' hardcover leduces to 35.4%, but a portion of this proposed reduction is in an area proposed to be used for boat display. The non-hardcover status of area used for boat display is questionable. Likewise, existing 75-250' hardcover is 73.9% which will be reduced to 72.2%. The net overall result is a proposed reduction of 1,301 s.f, bringing the property slightly nearer conformity. Lack of Sanitary Facilities The zoning code has long required that marinas provide sanitary facilities connected to public sanitary sewer where available. This marina has had sewer available since the early 1980's but has never complied with this requirement, only providing portable toilets on each side of the road for slip customers. Further, the code was revised in 1995 to require provision of head pumpout facilities and a porta-potty dump station. Agam, this marina has not provided those facilities at this site. The proposed boat sales/office building contains a single restroom which is clearly intended to serve just the employees and sales customers, not the slip customers (remember, this building is proposed to be closed on Sundays). The applicant should be required to provide the appropriate sanitary facilities if slip rental is intended to continue at this location. Stormwater Facilities While no changes are proposed to the existing parking lot, that parking lot was designed under 1989 standards and does not reflect the current stormwater requirements. The existing ponding area likely does not meet NURP standards, but has been serving its purpose of preventing trash from the parking lot being swept directly into the lake. The City Engineer has not reviewed the existing pond but the B-2 code indicates a stormwater plan must be submitted whenever a building permit or variance is requested. If this proposal is approved, a condition of approval should be review and upgrade (if necessary) of stormwater facilities on the site. Zoning File n\95 November 15, 1996 Page 6 Site Landscaping The proposed site plan indicates existing and proposed landscaping materials. Planning Commission should review these plans and determine whether any additional landscaping is necessary. Zoning Code/Comprehensive Plan Inconsistency Minnetonka Boat Works has not had a retail sales operation at this site for many years. The magnitude of the 1989 parking lot expansion was approved based on no retail sales occurring at the site. The proposed new retail sales use not only requires additional parking, but illuminates a long-standing inconsistency between the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan: - The Comprehensive Plan since 1980 has indicated 'boat sales' is not an appropriate use for the B-2 district: "Lakeshore commercial areas are not intended for typical retail activities, including boat sales, which could be accomplished away from the lake." In contrast, the Zoning Code has since 1975 allowed boat sales as a permitted use in the B-2 zone. Issues for Discussion % 1 . Are the lot depth and lot area variances justified by the historic and current use of this property as a marina? Note that this type of varianc*^: is required whenever a residential or commercial site is redeveloped by total replacement r*f the principal structure... Does the very non-conforming location of the existing building provide sufficient hardship and justification to allow its replacement with a building that will be more conforming in location, even though variances are still required? Should the green space created by reduction in the size of the building, be used for boat sales display? If not, those display boats would take up required parking spaces, increasing the magnitude of parking variance requested. Is there justification for granting a parking variance? Does the fact that any expansion of parking will also require variances, suggest an over-use of the site? Does Planning Commission agree with the applicants' concept that devoting slips to boat display should reduce the need for parking stalls serving those display slips? If so, perhaps the code should be amended to reflect this... 3. 4. 5. Zoning File #2195 November 15, 1996 Page 7 6.If parking on the west side of County Road 15 is approved, the parking stall number variance is eliminated. If that parking lot is not allowed, is there sufficient justification to allow the retail sales operation to occur, if done so in a manner that does not increase the potential weekend parking problems? Under what conditions would that be the case? Is the suggested Sunday closing a viable control? 7.Is the 1,300 s.f. reduction in hardcover on the site sufficient justification for the necessary hardcover variance? If boats for display are parked in the new non-hardcover area between the new building and the lake, how will that ultimately impact the non ­ hardcover status of that lawn area? 8.If the variances needed for this project are not granted, applicants intend to remodel the existing building. However, the potential uses of that building are still limited by parking needs for various activities occurring at the marina. Is the proposed office/sales building ultimately a better use of this site than the existing two story structure? 9.Is there any reason why this marina should be exempt from providing sanitary facilities for its slip customers? Staff Recommendation Planning Commission should consider whether each of the proposed/requested variances is adequately supported and justified by hardships. Further, Planning Commission should cdnsider whether the alternative of not granting the \'ariances results in a lost opportunity to bring the site into some degree of greater conformity. Note that this application is separate from the request for a parking lot on the west side of County Road 15, yet the outcome of that application impacts the degree of variances requested for the east side. Planning Commission should address the following items in any recommendation: Lot area & depth variances Variance for number of parking stalls Variance for parking not on same side of road as area served - Lakeshorc setback variance for new building Street setback variance for new building Hardcover variance Variance to allow boat storage in required yard Lack of sanitary facilities for slip customers Landscaping - Stormwater management - Specific conditions of approval Zoning File #2195 November 15, 1996 Page 8 Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Recommend approval as proposed, without specific conditions Recommend conditional approval. Table for further discussion or further information, or for specific revisions. Recommend denial. Other. •I * ' '■ .4 / , '•/ > •;?/ij>'/ ' ‘' '"' f»Vy , ' "■ f/*/ / / / < "iTT^N. / V y ^ ^ ^ I -n' > ^ _ . V / •' .' */«?/■ ■ ^ /;/ / e i25 /^■"' 7^1/. i? -■ Li»’/ / ll-f ff V. 4 — 5 '; 6 (16) I ii kM 11 - 3?«-'s5-'' to. '9 .' » 3 V S ff CE100 *“ H I < 0 0 "I \ It " ) Application H SLf9-^ Date Received Amount Paid ♦ t7C» rc (o -ay - CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Iniliad Application Fee $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) . , » Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00*^^^ ^ After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ^u<. ‘/id4t3. ^ Vj 2 9 4- // PROPERTY INFORMATION Q <hlJ '■ eM‘ 1 e-\- hZH-^n Site Address Mj^nnetonka Boatworks, 1449 Shoreline Privet, Orono, MN Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) 11-117-?.^-22QQQ8 Attach legal description to.application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired August ' 1 _________________________ I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ___residential ___mother (specify) ^iari_na__ (month/year) Zoning District: Lakeshore Business District Phone (home)APPLICANT Name Genmar Industries, Inc-_________ Phone (workr ^ ~ J-» » Address:l()0 S. 5th St.. Suite 240P Citv7^^^”^^P°^ ^ ^ Zip:, c/o Mary P. McConnell ONVNER (if different than applicant) Name 1-^7“ 0 55402 same as auove Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: See Exhibit 1 .attarhed ------------------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage Y Setback:Front Side X Rear Average Lakeshore y_ Other (specify) -Parkin g HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Exhibit 1 attach^------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUT!<ED SUBiVUTTALS OK // AH of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour ap ’plication to be considered complete; 1. 2. j. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 3-i8-"27l). Certificate of Survey (signec licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/j" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S'/j" x 11"). List of the legal names (include me. ims) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include r.aj. of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee paypient) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OVVTVER’S SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and furL.er authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and \ ilcation of this request. DateOwner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 8c. Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 J RUN DATE 10/24/9A HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LISTBATCH 502PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 56 11-117-25 22 000501A42 SHORELINE DR JAMES P RIVERS ETAL JAMES P RIVERS 14A4 SHORELINE OR MAYZATA m 55591 PROP ADOR 0I«CR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 58 11-117-25 22 0006 01A49 SHORELINE OR 6ENMAR INDUSTRIES INC M1NNET0M(A BOAT HORK P 0 BOX 5A9 NAYZATA m 55391 PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 56 11-117-25 25 0017 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO CAS PLATOU CARL N A SUSAN PLATOU I960 GREEN TREES RD MAYZATA MN 55591 REPORT NO. PIA55A01 PAGE 558 11-117-25 22 000601444 SHORELINE DR J P A M A RIVERS JAMES P A MARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA M4 55391 58 11-117-23 22 000700038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO J P A M A RIVERS JAMES P A MARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE OR MAYZATA MN 55391 58 11-117-23 23 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 6ENMAR INDUSTRIES INC MINNETONKA BOAT HORK P 0 BOX 549 MAYZATA MN 55591 38 11-117-25 23 0002 01475 SHORELINE DR D M A E A SCHMITT DOUGLAS R A ELLEN A SCHMITT 1475 SHORELINE OR MAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 502 00007 /.f* /• ’ < .N VI1 /I M I ■!>■ i:i f^ • - 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEtA.EPIN C0U4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. - . >■ ••J / • DATE \d9Hl\n,, iti) \N vj N City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638________ j-zs-^n A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8 AND SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 10 (D) AND PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 GRANTS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PER SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 2 APPROVES THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN FOR MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS PILE #1396 WHEREAS, Genmar Industries, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1449 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the expansion of an existing 42 stall par)cing lot by 26 additional stalls for a total of 68 stalls to support a boat slip expansion of the commercial marina of 48 slips for a total of 114 slips. Such improvement requires approval of a conditional use permit for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and a variance to Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 for land alterations conducted within the 0-75' lalceshore protected area where none is allowed, and per Section 10.41, Subdivision 10 (D) seelcs approval of a hardcover variance within the 0-75* setback area for an increase of 2,219 square feet or 1.7% (total existing = 23,390 s.f. or 14.1%, total proposed = 25,609 s.f. or 15.48%) as a result of the expanded parking area where no hardcover is allowed, and per Section 10.41, Subdivision 2 seeks approval of a commercial site plan for the expanded parking area within the eastern portion of the marina property divided by Hennepin County Road 15. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1396. Page 1 of 8 1 City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638_ _ _ _ _ 2. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of area. The marina property divided by County Road 15 consists of 1,815 acres within the east portion of the property and 1*35 ®cres within the west portion of the property for a total of 3,281 acres, 3, The Orono Council reviewed this application on May 8, 1989, and conceptually approved the proposed variances and conditional use permit based upon one or more of the following findings and hardships: A) The east and west portions of the marina property are not deep enough to allow an expansion of the parking area that would meet the required lakeshore setback. B) The current pattern of docks on the west and east side with parking provided only on the east has existed for this marina for over 40 years without mishap. C) The majority of the property is located within lakeshore protected area where no hardcover is allowed. D) The property has been used as a commercial marina for over 40 years. E) Based on County and City records there have been no personal injury or property damage resulting cross-over use of the clients of either Windward Marine or Minnetonka Boat Works, The accident records of the City from 1985 to the present reveal only 5 accidents. None of these accidents were related to the cross-over activities of the clients of the marina properties. F) Drainage/run-off will be improved by providing re­ direction of surface run-off into a retention pond for treatment rather than draining directly into the la e per current pattern of drainage. G) The applicant, represented by Irwin Jacobs, has agreed to work with the City to improve the level of safety for the users of the county road and the marina facilities in the area. The applicant plans to install appropriate "No Trespassing" signage and provide additional personnel to patrol the area. Page 2 of 8 >r 1 1, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638________ H) The City has asked for increased police supervision in the area to enforce "no parking" along county road. 4. The applicant proposes the removal of 6 mature trees as a result of the expanded parking area within the 0-75' setback area. Per amended Section 10.22, Subdivision 3, the applicant shall apply for a staff permit for tree removal and in addition submit a planting schedule for the required replacement trees. 5. On April 20, 1989, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District granted a permit that would approve the expansion of the parking area and the retention pond with treatment facility for the Minnetonka boat Works. 6. Glenn Cook, City Engineer, in a report dated April 12, 1989, conceptually approved the proposed drainage plan and ponding area subject to specific modifications in the proposed plan. 7. Wayne A. Matsumoto of the Hennepin County Department of Public Works, in a report dated May 3, 1989, noted ^he following: A) The County was not aware of an accident problem in this area and recommended approval of a marked cross­ walk to serve the clients of the marinas. He did not feel the limited number of accidents within this section of County Road 15 would warrant the installation of flashing yellow lights. B) He added that a pedestrian bridge would appear to be out of the question because of the limited land area and land base needed to support the handicapped requirement. C) He also noted that a walk-way under the Tanager Lake Bridge for the clients of the marina may result in a security risk. 8. The City Council has considered this application including the findings of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 8 .m. f'*’" , ‘•i* ***^ WmU m ^\*» City of ORONO i5i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___^38 9. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions/ light/ air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant/ but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 10. The City Council finds that the expansion of the parking area within the lakeshore protected area shall not be detrimental to the health/ safety or general welfare of the public/ would not adversely affect light/ air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties/ nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono Cit;.' Council hereby grants the variances and conditional use permit as set forth above and approves the commercial site plan date revised by Sathre, Bergguist Inc. and attached to this resolution as Page 8 of 8 for the Minnetonka Boat Works, subject to the following conditions: 1. Owner to execute a Developer's Agreement and post a Letter of Credit (150% of cost of required improvements) with the City to ensure the following improvements are fulfilled upon the installation of the expanded parking area: A) Drainage/surface water treatment improvements per final plans approved by the M.C.W.D. and City of Orono. The City Engineer has requested the following amendments to the drainage plan: i. The parking lot grading plan to be modified to provide a minimum 1% grade. Page 4 of 8 City of ORONO m^. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638 ii. The area between the parking lot and the lake should be a minimum of 6" higher than the parking lot. • • f111.Pre-cast concrete bumper curbs to be installed around the parking lot. B)’ Paving of parking lot access from County Road 15. C) Installation of loading dock within east dock section providing safe, easy access for clients. D) Planting of replacement trees and shrubs adjacent to dumpster. 2. Applicant to install appropriate "Private Property/No Trespassing" signage within both portions of marina property. Applicant is hereby advised that if fencing is deemed necessary at some future time, that variance approval is required if sections of the fencing are to be located within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area. 3. The City of Orono shall install a cross-walk as approved by Hennepin County and the Public Works Director of the City of Orono. Applicant shall participate in the shared payment for all costs associated with the installation of cross­ walk. 4. Final landscape plan shall include a planting schedule for replacement trees and screening of dumpster on the east portion of the property and as shown on attached site plan. 5. The new dock construction shall be subject to the following conditions; A) Access to dock must be maintained every 300'. B) The 20-B? C rating shall be maintained by providing firs extinguishers on each float and one on the pier or warf 25' at the head of the gangway to float, pursuant to Uniform Fire Code Section 79.911 (e). C) All electrical equipment installed and used must be in accordance with the National Electrical Code as it applies to wet, deunp or hazardous locations. Page 5 of 8 1 L_ I I 55r?,y 5^ ^ fS>,-;i;>>,<;;'. ‘ixiyrir/.’^ LPNpvJ City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638________ D) All portions of floats exceeding 250' in distance to ensure fire department access shall be provided with an annroved wet standoioe svstem installed in insure rire aepartmenu access suaxx pxwvx«cw wxu*. an approved wet standpipe system installed in conformity with Uniform Building Code Section 382 as follows: i. Hose station shall be spaced as to provide protection to any portion of the floats or the floating vessels. ii. Hoses shall be mounted on a reel or rack and enclosed within an approved cabinet. Hose station shall be labeled "Fire Hose - Emergency Use Only". iii. All equipment shall meet the approval of the fire inspector. 6. Erosion control shall be employed at all times on the site during the time of the expansion of the parking lot area. 7. Applicant to apply for a building permit for commercial dock construction. 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by the application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this approval will expire on that date (May 22, 1990). 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of Genmar Industries, it heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 6 of 8 J aC 11 m VV:;-. :/:> ^•5:‘ City of OROJNO '5^1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2638________ May, 1989. Adopted by the Orono City Ccuhcil on this 22nd day of ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of May, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Ndtary Public ¥\,. rk i/LiRl'j K. SCHEfFlEB ^ »UIHC - MlNNlSOT^ HENN:?iN COUNTY M\ io*> 6-S-93 My Commission Expires Page 7 of 8 __ _ _ _..t j COUNCIL MEET1NQ JAN 2 T 1997 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 24, 1997 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: vv. Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Projects Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2196 Genmar Industries, Inc., 1449 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Conceptual Denial Zoning District: B-2 Lakeshore Business District. Application: Request for conditional use permit and variances to excavate and remote approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material from the site of a proposed parking lot on the west side of Shoreline Drive near the Tanager Lake channel. Proposal requires variances for excavation and hardcover within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, as well as for extensive land alteration and intensive vegetation clearing in a bluff impact zone. List of Exhibits A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/26/96 B - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/96 C - DNR Comments Received 11/18/96 D - Hennepin County Public V/orks Comments Received 11/18/96 E - Memo and Exhibits of 11/15/96 Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of November 15th, as welt as Planning Commission minutes from the November 18th meeting. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Comm ’ssion reviewed this item at their November 18th meeting and on a vote of 5-0 recommended denial, indicating the following general basis for denial: 1.Removal of the bluff would be inconsistent with the goals and policies of Orono ’s Comprehensive Plan. : •! ** f.• f Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 January 24, 1997 Zoning File #2196 2.The hardships presented are self-created and inadequate to support an approval recommendation. 3.Any safety concerns associated with the need for slip customers to cross County Road 15, can be addressed in other ways. Bas's for Denial In reviewing this application, Planning Commission was asked to consider the issues of safety, environmental sensitivity, the character of the locality, and whether the request is supported by adequate hardships. In weighing the environmental impacts of eliminating a natural bluff feamre which is protected by the Comprehensive Plan generally and the City's Shoreland Ordinance specifically. Planning Commission concluded that the lack of documented accidents seems to outweigh the inconvenience suffered by slip customers who must cross County Road 15 from the parking lot. Planning Commission also considered that the need for parking on the west side was in part created by the applicant in 1989 when the number of slips on the Tanager Lake side was increased from 25 to 67 slips. Planning Commission also considered the visual impacts of bluff removal, not only from properties in the immediate area but from a visual impact as viewed from the lake. Considering that the Comprehensive Plan clearly indicates that lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Planning Commission felt that the proposed "toppii.g" of the bluff would be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Com.mission briefly reviewed other options for access ^rom the east to the west side of 15, including the possibility of a bridge, a tunnel, a walkway underneath the Tanager Lake bridge, etc. The possibility of installing a pedestrian crosswalk controlled by a semaphore was given little if any consideration, considering the possible implications for impeding traffic movement. It was noted that this concern was discussed at length in 1989 and none of the options seemed feasible. Comments from the Hennepin County Department of Public Works suggested that there is a safe location for an access entrance if the parking lot is approved. Hennepin County did not comment on the application other than as to the potential entrance location. The Department of Natural Resources staff indicated that in their opinion this bluff should not be removed, and that the hardship is self-created, noting that if the parking on the Browns Bay side of County Road 15 was inadequate to serve the Tanager Lake facility, the Tanager Lake facility should not have been expanded by 42 slips. • Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 January 24, 1997 Zoning File #2196 >5 Based on the above noted concerns, Planning Commission reached a conclusion that it would be inappropriate to develop parking on the Tanager Lake side of County Road 15. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the request based on many of the factors noted above it should additionally be noted that the proposed 28 stall parking lot would only be sufficiem to i-.Tve 46 slips under Orono's B-2 code requirements, although there are 67 slips on the Tanager Lake side. An adil.tional item for consideration is that an increase in the number of total parking slips at the Genmar facility might be used by Genmar as justification to request a revision to their existing LMCD "special density license", which could conceivably under LMCD rules allow 1 slip per 10' of shoreline, and potentially result in a doubling (if not tripling, if breakwater shoreline footage is credited) the number of slips at the site. Options for Action 1.Conceptually deny, directing staff to draft a denial resolution for adoption at Council's February 10th meeting. 2. Conceptually approve with or without conditions, direct staff to draft approprialf. resolution. 3. Table for additional information (specify). 4.Other. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to draft the appropriate resolution based on Council's determination of denial or approval. £0^^. / CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2196 ' NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: November 26, 1996 TO:Cenmar Industries, Inc. 100 South 5th Street Suite 2400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn; Mary P. McConnell COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 11/18/96 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Denial for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission's discussion indicated the following general reasons for denial: Bluff removal is inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Hardships presented are self-created and inadequate to support an approval recommendation. Safety concerns may be addressed in other ways. At the November 18 meeting, applicant requested that Council review of this item be delayed until the future Council meeting at which both Applications #2195 and #2196 can be heard together. That date is likely to be Monday, February 10, 1997. Because the 60-day application review period would normally expire on January 25, 1997, the review period is hereby extended to February 12, 1997. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#10 - #2195 Genmar Industries - Continued) Lindquist said the application as he saw it calls for a 10 stall variance to the parking code. Lindquist said he would not differentiate between the uses. Lindquist said the facility should provide toilets and pump out. Smith agreed. He noted he did like the green area. Berg said the old building showed a character not present with the new building proposed. Lindquist asked the applicant if the application should be tabled for ftirther review or if a vote should be taken. McConnell asked for a 'ditional comments before tabling. Hawn said she would be interested in viewing the City Engineer’s report on the pond to see if it was adequate to meet the current standards. Lindquist noted that the proposal should meet the ordinance changes made in 1995. Mr. Schmitt asked if there were any building codes that must be met. Gafifon said the building must meet the B-2 standards, but those standards do not discuss how the building should look. Berg said she traveled the road daily and is concerned with the traffic and number of people using the facility on the narrow, busy roadway. She saw the site as being the entrance into Orono and said she was adamant that the building be a good representation ofOrono Berg cited a nearby example of a remodeled building that the proposal should emulate. Gaffron indicated there were licensing standards that are required to be met. He notdd' that the property has been open during the winter and summer to include storage and asked if there was further intent to add storage. McConnell said the applicant had looked at that possibility, but it was not their intent to provide for storage at this time but possibly in the future. Smith moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2195 to allow for further review. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. The application will be reviewed at the January, 1997 meeting. (#11) #2196 GENMAR INDUSTRIES, INC, 1449 SHORELLNE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITAARLANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 10:SM1:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. I MINUTES OF THE ORCNO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#11 - #2196 Genmar Industries - Continued) Gafiron reported that the property owned by Genmar Industries is two separate tax parcels. This application refers to the property on the west side on Tanager Lake, north of the bridge. The proposal calls for a parking area on this property. There are a number of trees on this property that would be affected. The property includes an existing protected bluft. The 28-stall parking lot would require the removal of two-thirds of the bluff Also affected is the 0-75' setback requiring a hardcover variance for access. Gaffron reported that Hennepin County indicated they had no problem with the access location. The proposal will require extensive grading and cutting into the hillside. There would be a berm on the lake side and by the road to screen the parking lot. The City Engineer has recommended a larger pond be constructed than what is currently proposed. Gaftron read a letter into the minutes from the DNR recommending denial of the application for what they see is a self-created hardship. The DNR noted that the proposal would call for removal of 5000 cubic yards or the top 18' of the bluflf. Gaftron reiterated the City approvals required by the project as proposed which include the following: 1) Conditional use permit for land alteration in excess of 100 cubic yards, 2) Variance for land alterations within 75' of the shoreline, 3) Hardcover within 75' of the shoreline, 4) Intensive vegetation clearing within 75* of the shoreline and in a bluff impact zone, and 5) Hardcover in 7r>ne in pvr*»cc Gaftron indicated that the MCV\T) has not yet responded to the proposal. He did note, however, that the State archaeologist felt the site was natural and did not contain dredge spoils. The archaeologist said there are no indications of any burial on the property. » Gaftron reviewed the inconsistencies between the proposal and the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that it was inappropriate to do any reworking of the lakeshore. The bluflf destruction to create a parking lot was not consistent with the Comp Plan. Gaffron indicated that a variance was required for extensive tree removals which would change the features of the bluff The proposal would also change the neighbors view of the marina as well as the parked cars. Gaffron reported that the issue of safety was suggested as a justification for granting the variance in the hardship statement. In 1989, the LMCD approved the expansion of slips on Tanager Lake, which was then accommodated by the City by allowing parking expansion on the east side of the road. However, the current parking situation does not meet code, and the proposal is an attempt to meet the code. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#11 - #2196 Genmar Industries - Continued) Gaffron said Police Chief Cheswick suggested that the proposal would not solve all of the problems present but would solve some parking needs. He was concerned that the project would bring trespassers closer to the channel and security could be a concern. He saw the proposal as a solution for the slip customers. Cheswick had also suggested revisiting suggestions made in 1989 for a tunnel under the bridge, or a bridge over the road. Gaffron said there are few documented incidents of pedestrian crossing problems, but he noted it was difficult to cross given the high volume and regularity of traffic on CoRd 15. Ga5fon noted the City Engineer has reviewed the proposal, indicating it would require a larger pond in addition to the typical conditions such as a hauling route, disposal location, construction scheduie, and traffic control plans. • • Gaffron noted that the proposal would help applicant meet in the parking requirements for the new building proposed under Application #2195. Gaffron asked the Planning Commission to consider the issues presented. Staff recommends that other options be considered for safe access without removal of the bluff McConnell, in answering the issues brought forward by Gaffron, noted safety to be the reason behind the proposal and not the over development of the dockage system. She noted that the police department records did not reflect the near misses of accidents as a result of pedestrian crossing. McConnell felt the proposal was the best solution. She also reiterated Hennepin County's approval of the access and provision of adequate sight line. McConnell indicated that it would only take one fatality to counter any of the issues brought forward. % % McConnell addressed the issue of removal of a portion of the bluff. The berm proposed is a counter to this issue according to McConnell. A cross section of the property was shown noting the proposal would preserve the rise in the topography and hide the parking area. From the Tanager Lake side, there would still be a raise in the land and a trail to the shore provided. McConnell said the proposal addressed the views and the noise issue. She also said the applicant was revisiting the storm water area to meet construction schedule needs Melby infomied the Commission that the proposal called for only the excavation of what was needed to the 950' contour and uiatched on the other side. The existing plantings would be left as much as possible. He also noted that the plan calls for working from the inside out to eliminate any more e.xcavation than necessary'. McMillan asked if there would be any steps and was informed that steps would be placed where needed. She was also informed that the grade would be at a 3; 1 slope. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#11 - #2196 Genmar Industries - Continued) McConnell responded to the suggestions made in 1989 and again by Chief Cheswick for a tunnel or bridge. She noted that Hennepin County said a bridge was not feasible and a tunnel would be a security risk. Doug Schmitt noted the presence of Indian Mounds in the Orono area and questioned the review by the State archaeologist. Mabusth reiterated the findings by the archaeologist of a natural sight with no burial grounds, Gaffron read the letter w'ritten by the State archaeologist. Schmitt inquired about a cut into the land on the north side by this site that had been stopped. GaSron said he did not know the history of that excavation, but it was quite visible when standing on the north side of the bluff. Schmitt asked if there would be any opportunity for more slips. Gaffron said the LMCD has already provided a special density permit noting a marina must provide a number of amenities. Gaffron indicated the number of slips is in direct correlation to the shoreline footage and amenities provided, and is within the jurisdiction of the LMCD. He did note that the Council may have an opinion as to whether additional slips might ever be developed at this site. Schmitt informed the Commission that he was concerned that another building such as a double wide mobile might be erected on the site. McConnell said they have no intention to add a structure or additional slips. % % Hawn said she was opposed to cutting into the bluff on the lakeshore. Smith agreed noting the recommendation for denial by the DNR. McMillan and Berg also voiced their opposition to cutting into the bluff'. Lindquist asked the applicant if a vote or tabling was preferred. The applicant asked for a vote. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to deny Application #2196. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. At Applicant's request, it was indicated that Applications #2195 and #2196 would be presented together to the Council, probably at their first meeting in February, 1997. SKETCH PLAN/CONCEPTUAL REVIEWS (#12) #2190 JAMES G. FULLERTON, HI., 3350/3400 FOX STREET - SKETCH OF A n\T LOT SUBDIVISION The applicant, John Winston, was present. , c Minnesota Department of Natural Resources METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL. MN 55106 (612) 112-19X0 - telephone (612) 772-7977 - faximUe NoveS^ 15,1996 Mr. Mike Gaffixm City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 VT;" LAND USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Gaffron: I have comments on the following land use applications on the Planning Commission agenda for November 18, 1996. #2187. Donald and Robin Heleaeer. 3265 County Road 6 (Lake Classen 27-162P). The applicants are proposing to increase the footprint of the existing house significantly (essentially double), with most of the addition extending into either the 150 foot 'ninimum lakeshore setback or the 50 foot minimum road .setback. An existing garage that does not currently meet the lakeshore setback would be replaced by an attached garage that would meet the lakeshmv setback except for a small portion of the comer. We recommend that the city deny the application as currently proposed. There is reasonable use of the lot without the extensive encroachment into the lakeshore and road setback areas. However, we would not object to die replacement of the garage as currenUy proposed. #2196. Geiunar (Mirmetonka Boatworksl. 1449 Shoreline Drive (Tatuiger Lake 27-14IP). The applicant requests to remove the top 18 feet (approximatley 5,000 cubic yards ofmaterial)ofahilf in order to construct a parkirig lot for a marina facility on Tanager Lake. The “hill” meets the definition of a bluff in the city’s shoreland management ordinance. We recomment that the city deny the request to significanUy alter a natural bluff area in order to build a parking lot. The need for parking on the Tanager Lake side of County Road 15 was created when the Tanager marina facility expanded by 42 slips in 1990. We feel this is a self-created hardship. If the parking on the Brown ’s Bay side of County Road 15 was inadequate to serve the Tanager Lake facility, the Tanager Lake facility should not have been expanded by 42 slips. Please contact me at 772-7914 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist c:Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Classen FUc (27-162P) Minnetonka Boatworks File Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Tanager Lake File (27-141P) DNR Intorniaiion: M2-2^(>-6I.S7. 1 .S(X)-766-6(hKJ • TTY; 6l2-296-.‘»4S4. I-800-6.S7-.t929 .An F.qujI Opportumiv Employer Who \j1uC' DivcfMiv Printed on Recycled Paper Containing j Minimum ol Po%t-Con>umer Wa>ie 1 J ennepin County X. An Equal Oppominity Employer / .• V-»iitr\. ( ‘ nnn\ AJmini'ii.iiv't . /'zy •'';■? 0#v'’e November 14, 1996 Mike Gaffron Asst. Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Minnetonka Boat Works Site, CSAH 15 (File #2196) Mike: The proposed access to the above site, as far north as practicable, is acceptable to Hennepin County. The road right-of-way should be totally cleared of vegetation, and graded to enhance the southerly sight-distance and maintain positive drainage. Thanks for the timely inquiry in this matter and please call with further questions. 1 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496 (612)930-2500 FAX;(6i2)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696 TO: FROM: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator // DATE:November 15,1996 SUBJECT: #2196 Genmar Industries, Inc., 1440 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use PemiitA^ariance - Public Hearing V r - '' Zoning District: B-2 Lakeshore Business District. Application: Request for conditional use permit and variances to excavate and remove appro.\imately 5,000 cubic yards of material from the site of a proposed parking lot on the west side of Shoreline Drive near the Tanager Lake channel. The proposal requires variances for excavation and hardcover within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, as well as for extensive land alteiation and intensive vegetation clearing in a bluff impact zone. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List ^ D - Letter of Request/Hardships E - Hardcover Calculations F - Survey G - Existing Site Plan / H - Proposed Site Plan I - Proposed Grading Plan J - Existing Topography K - City Engineer Comments L - DNR Comments (Not received as of 11-15-96) M - State Archaeologists Comments N - Bluff Status Determination O - Comprehensive Plan Excerpts P - Police Incident Reports Q - LMCD 1989 Approval of Additional Tanager Lake Slips Summary of Request Please review the applicant ’s letter of request. Exhibit D. Applicant prcpcses to constrv.ct a parking lot just north of the Tanaget Lake bridge between County Road 15 and Tanager Lake. iTiis project would involve the remov'al of appro.ximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil, a portion of which is located less than 75' from the shoreline. The parking lot is proposed at ?n elevation ranging from Zoning File #2196 November 15,1996 Page 2 approximately 940-944' or approximately 6-8' above the surface of County Road 15. This will require the removal of approximately the top 25-30' of this bluff feature, which according to applicant's submittal rises to an elevation of 974 or approximately 45' above the lake level. As noted in applicant's submittal, the access to this parking area is north of the bluff and within 75' of the shoreline. The project as proposed requires the following City approvals; 1. Conditional use permit for land alteration in excess of 100 cubic yards (10.03, Subd. 21). 2. Variance for land alterations within 75' of the shoreline (10.22, Subd. 2; 10.55, Subd. 8; 10.56, Subd. 16[J]). 3. Hardcover within 75' of the shoreline (10.22, Subd. 2; 10.55, Subd. 8; 10.56, Subd. 16[L]). 4. Intensive vegetation clearing within 75' of the shoreline and in a bluff impact zone (10.56, Subd. 16[I]). 5. Hardcover in 75-250' zone in excess of 25% allowed (10.22, Subd. 2; 10.56, Subd. 16[L]). Agencies from which the City has requested comment c * tiiis application include the DNR, MCWD, and Hennepin County Public Works. Applicant has also contacted the State Archaeologist. Inconsistency with Comprehensive Plan The 1980 City of Orono Community Management Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") contains a number of general land use and environmental protection goals and policies with which the proposed land alteration would be inconsistent. Specifically, General Land Use Policy No. 6 on page 4-13 indicates that "lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or flood plain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water q .r/iiiy, aesthedc values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which Tan be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear cutting will be prohibited . ..". In Gc ieral Land Use Policy No. 13, the Comprehensive Plan states "future developments must enhance the environment. Land development shou’ ^ respect and enhance the unique natural fe?*ures of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features alw’ays producing more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does w'holesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density." I 4i Zoning File #2196 November 15, 1996 Page 3 The Environmental Protection Goals on page 3-20 include the following: "Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged." The City has on numerous past occasions relied on these and other principles contained within the Comprehensive Plan, to deny land alteration conditional use permits and specifically, variances for grading within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, in cases where excavation and lowering of the natural lakeshore grades was proposed in order to, for instance, allow the creation of a walkout residence. The City has long taken the position that such excavations create an artificial and unnatural lakeshore appearance. The existing bluff proposed to be excavated appears as a natural feature on the landscape. The State Archaeologist has given an opinion that this is a natural remnant glacial feature and likely is not dredge spoil. In staffs opinion, its alteration as proposed would be inconsistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Hardcover Variance Applicant has provided hardcover calculations based on the portion of property located west of County Road 15 for purposes of this review. 0-75' hardcover will increase from .06% to 7.30%, due mainly to the 25' access driveway at the north end of the parking lot. In the 75-250' zone, hardcover would incivuvc from 0% to 53.57%, where only 25% hardcover is allowed. Bluff Status Staff has completed a cross section analysis of the existing hill, and determined that based on the zoning code criteria, the hill is in fact a bluff by definition, because: a. It is within the Shoreland District. b. The slope rises at least 25' above the OHWL (it actually rises approximately 40-45' above the OHWL). c. The grade from the toe of the bluff to a point 25' or more above the OHWL is greater than 30% (based on the zoning code definitions of "toe of bluff the grade is 63%, although at some locations it is 100% or a 1:1 slope). d. The slope drains tov/ard the water body. Orono's bluff protection requirements were created as part of the Shoreland Management Ordinance adopted by the City Council in 1992. While the City has granted a number of variances for construction of buildings within the bluff impact zone, this is the only request the City has received w hich proposes the total destruction and removal of a bluff feaUire. Zoning File #2196 November 15, 1996 Page 4 Intensive Vegetation Removal Shoreland Ordinance Section 10.56, Subd. 16(1) prohibits removal of live trees within the 0-75' setback zone that are 6" or greater in diameter, unless a permit has been issued by City staff. That section requires replace of an equivalent number of trees of a size and nature found acceptable to staff. Section 16(1-2) prohibits intensive vegetation clearing within 75' of the shoreline and on steep slopes and in bluff impact zones. Intensive vegetation clearing is defined as the complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row or block. Since virtually the entire feature is within the bluff impact zone, excavation in an area approximately 100' wide and 200' long certainly would be considered as intensive vegetation clearing. • Hardship Statement Please review applicant's statement of hardship on the second page of Exhibit D. Applicant suggests that the property area and configuration would not allow the proposed use without the hardcover variances. One can either construe this fact as a hardship to the property, or can conclude that the property is not suitable for the proposed use. The safety concern is also noted as a justification for granting the variances. The compelling reason for the request ultimately is the over-development of the dockage sysi^m on Tanager Lake. In 1989 the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District approved an expansion from the pre-existing 25 slips on Tanager Lake to 64 slips, an increase of 39 slips. The LMCD approved this apparently without consideration of the ability of the land bast to support such an increase in intensity of use. LMCD gianted a special density license based on Minnetonka Boat Works providing a number of public 'amenities' (See Exhibit Q). The City Council subsequently and upon advice of the City Attorney, chose not to oppose the LMCD and ultimately allowed Minnetonka Boat Works to increase the size of the parking lot on the east side of County Road 15 to accommodate these slips, at the City required ratio of 6 stalls per 10 slips. However, a variance was granted at that time to allow those stalls to be across the County Road from the slips they serve. Genmar is now concurrently proposing a revised use of their property on the east side of County Road 15 which requires additional parking spaces. In order to provide those spaces and also to provide a safer parking area for the Tanager Lake slip users, the current parking lot request has been submitted. Safety Issues When the 39 slips were added on Tanager Lake, a requirement of the City's parking expansion approval was striping of a pedestrian cross walk approximately at the north end of the Genmar property. Windward Marina (to the immediate north of the Genmar property) was redeveloped at about this same time. Staff has been advised by the owner of Windward Marina that on busy Zoning File #2196 November 15,1996 Page 5 weekends, Geiimar customers have been known to use Windward Marina's parking areas, not only to avoid having to walk across County Road 15, but Vcause the Genmar parking lot has been full. It is difficult to argue against the need for Genmar parking on the west side of County Road 15, other than to argue that the additional 39 slips should not have been allowed in the first place. However, those slips exist and unless the property owner agrees to eliminate a significant number of those slips or the City forces that to occur, a parking and crossing safety problem will exist. Police Chief Cheswick was asked to comment on the proposed new parking area. He noted the following: Creating an additional access point on County Road 15 at this location will not necessarily enhance the safety of that County Road. The additional traffic ingress/egress will add one more potential problem point along that road. In addition, parking that close to the Tanager Lake bridge will likely increase the amount of trespas.sing and pedestrian traffic in the area of the channel. Mr. Jacobs, owner of Genmar, has indicated that trespass and the safety of trespassers on the property continues to be a problem, especially near the bridge. The cross walk required by the City is likely little used and as functionally ineffective as most other cross walks that are not optimally located. A better solution to the problem of pedestrian traffic crossing County Road 15 might be installation of a bridge or a tunnel across the road. The existing traffic level of 20,000 cars per day is likely not going to decrease, and this site will only become a greater concern in the future. The concept of a tunnel or pedestrian bridge was discussed in 1989, but cost and security issues were given as reasons this did not go forward. The police department has provided an eight year history of incidents in the stretch from the Tanager Lake bridge to just north of Windward Marina. The number of recorded incidents involving pedestrian slip users crossing County Road 15 is indiscernible. However, these records do not indicate the number of close calls, or define the degree of inconvenience experienced by marina users waiting for a gap in the traffic. Engineering Review City Engineer Shawn Gustafson has reviewed the proposed parking layout from an engineering standpoint and finds it generally acceptable. Please review his letter dated November 4, 1996 (Exhibit K). Note the following engineering concerns: 1.The skimming and ponding basins should be expanded to accommodate the runoff from a 2 1/2" rainfall to meet the NURP standards. Zoning File #2196 November 15,1996 Page 6 2. The plans should be submitted to the MCWD for review and approval 3. 4. The plans should also be sent to the DNR for review and comment, Haul route, disposal location, construction schedule and traffic control plans need to be developed. 5.Applicant would be responsible for cleaning the surface of any paved public streets that become soiled. 6. The City must retain the authority to control hauling activity based oa weather conditions, Parking Requirements for New Building As a separate but related application, Genmar is proposing to remove the old brown building at the northeast end of their property, and replace it with a smaller structure intended to serve as an office for a new boat sales operation at the site. This marina was approved in 1989 for the minimum required number of parking spaces absent any retail operation occurring on the property. The 111 slips require 67 parking stalls at a required ratio of 6 stalls per 10 slips, and 68 spaces exist. The addition of retail activity at this site will require an additional 8 parking stalls, and applicant proposes to convert 12 slips from rental/lease usage to use for storing boats that are for sale. The net result is a request for a 3 stall variance absent the ability to create additional parking on the west side of the property. This is further discussed with the commercial site plan and variance request, Application #2195. Issues for Consideration 1.Absent the safety issue, would there be any justification for approving the severe land alterations proposed in order to create a parking lot? 2.Are the hardships presented in support of the variances based on circumstances of the natural land features, or merely a function of the over-use of this environmentally sensitive property? 3. 4. Will granting of the variances alter the essential character of the locality? Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property, or are the circumstances created by the land owner? 5. 6. Can the property be put to a reasonable use if the variances are not granted? Would the City be better served by creating additional parking on the east side of County Zoning File #2196 November 15,1996 Page 7 Road 15 rather than approving the proposed new parking lot? Or, considering the excessive hardcover already existing on the east side of the property, is it more appropriate to place limits on the current or future use of the site? Should an alternative means for pedestrian crossing of County Road 15 be explored in greater depth? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that other options for providing safe access for the Tanager Lake slip users be explored rather than removal of a bluff landscape feature, the removal of which would be totally inconsistent with Orono's Comprehensive Plan. Options for Action 1. Approve variances and conditional use permit as proposed. 2. Approve with specific conditions. 3. Table for further review or further specific information.1 4.Recommend denial. 5.Other. • 1 •' I.C. 5 O •^* Apiplication H f(^ Ddte Received CUl CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION Amount Paid i>LfOO. cO ^-7 2S' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Minnetonka Boatworkst .1449 Shoreline Drive, Orono, MN Type of Application to be Filed rnnftitirmal ii«;a anH Varianrp________________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 11-117-23 23 0001____________________ APPLICANT Name Genmar Industries^ Inc. Phone (home) _______ Phone (vvork)3 3 7-1803 Address ton S. 5 th St.. f>nitp 740 |^)ity Mi nnpapnl i MNZip c/o Mary P. McConnell OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)____________ Name W/A ___________Phone (work)___________________________ Address Citv Zip. D^Property Acquired August 1985_________ I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) 2 X FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _ S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ $175.00 Residential Accessory Use _ £250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ $200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _ $250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain X Grading and filing - 101 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore X PRDT’ID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee • Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation SI00.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____S350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District .^li_Jl£k£sh£r_e Busir.^;ss District Present Use of Property______Residential ____Other (specify)Marin.a. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. j. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Anach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11 ” X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;_________________________Date----------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hi^er knowledge. Applicant's signature ^ OWTS'ER S SIGN.ATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable* entiy onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature 7 7 Date jO ^^ Applicant must have all subnittals into the Citv offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 10/2^/96BATCH 512 HENNEPIN CCXJNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 33PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 11-117-23 22 000401440 SHORELINE DR JAMES P RIVERS ETAL JAMES P RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 30 11-117-23 22 000501442 SHORELINE DR JAMES P RIVERS ETAL JAMES P RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 000601444 SHORELINE DR J P A M A RIVERS JAT^S P A MARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER i4AME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 11-117-23 22 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J P A M A RIVERS JAMES P A MARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELItJE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THE CITY OF ORONO CITY Of ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 36 11-117-23 23 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GENMAR INDUSTRIES INC MINhCTONKA BOAT NORK P 0 BOX 549 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0008 01449 SHORELINE DR GENMAR INDUSTRIES INC MINNETONKA BOAT NORK P 0 BOX 549 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0014 01432 SHORELINE DR LAUREN E DORN ETAL LAUREN E DORN 1432 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA m 55391 38 11-117-23 23 0002 01475 SHORELINE DR D M S E A SCHMITT DOUGLAS R 1 ELLEN A SCHMITT 1475 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J P 4 M A RIVERS JAMES P t MARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0015 01420 SHORELINE DR S B 4 A B SILL STEVEN B 4 AMANDA B SILL 1420 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 23 0011 01485 GREEN TREES RD 0 L 4 M H VERGEYLE DAVID 4 MAPGARET VERGEYLE 1485 GREEN TREES RD NAYZATA MN 55391 t% — V' . *> n PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 11-117-23 23 0012 01495 GREEN TREES RD J A NALKER 4 S S NALKER JAMES A 4 SHAROT4 S NALKER 1495 GREEN TREES RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 23 0017 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED C 4 S PLATOU CARL N 4 SUSAN PLATOU 1480 GREEN TREES RD NAYZATA riN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 512 00014 • »• i :V .f 5 Exhibit 1 to Conditional Use Permit and Variance Application • Genmar Industries, Inc. Genmar proposes to construct a parking lot adjacent to Tanager Lake on the west side of Highway 15 on the portion of the property known as the Minnetonka Boatworks, 1449 Shoreline Drive in Orono, Minnesota. The parking lot will provide safer and more convenient parking to users of the rental slips adjacent to Tanager Lake west of Highway 15. Presently, boaters access the Tanager slips by parking in the existing lot located adjacent to Lake Minnetonka east of Highway 15. Boaters must then cross over Highway 15 to access their slips. Given the heavy traffic conditions on Highway 15 during peak boating days, the proposed lot would provide a much safer access point to slips. Existing Conditions. Currently, the parcel of the property is undeveloped. The location where the parking area will be constructed is characterized by a steop hill, which is approximately 25 feet tall and constructed of dredged spoils. We have contacted the State Archaeologist who will provide a determination on whether tho site presents any archaeological significance. Trees and understory a.”e located in this area. D Proposal. 1. Parking Area Specifications and Setback. The proposed parking area will be constructed following the limited removal of trees and excavation of soil. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil will be removed from center of the hill area as shown on the enclosed site and gracing plan. Vegetated berms surrounding the parking area will be left In place to provide a visual screening from Highway 15 and Tanager Lake. Following grading, the surface of the parking area will be graveled. This lot will provide 28 parking spots in an area approximately 55 by 170 feet. Vehicle access to the parking lot will be provided from Highway 15. Genmar has discussed the acquisition of an access permit with Hennepin County staff during a site meeting held on October 23, 1996. Hennepin County staff indicated that an access permit would be provided if the road entrance could be moved as far as feasible to the north to provide sufficient sight distance for traffic. The proposed road entrance location requires placement of the entrance, and road connecting the entrance to the lot, to be within the 75 foot setback from Tanager Lake. The access from the parking lot to the Tanager Lake slips will be a four- foct wide walkway with gravel and wooden steps where required. All other portions of the parking lot are in conformance with the 75 foot lake setbacks and 30 foot frontyard setbacks. Runoff from the parking lot will be directed to a ponding basin and skimming structure as shown on the attached grading plan. 2. Parking Lot Use. ’n .. .V . i : ^ *.» C:1 5 # %• r ••;% The proposed lot will be used only by persons renting slips from the marina manager. “Private - No Trespassing ” signs will be posted. Construction of this lot will allow the marina to operate without obtaining a variance for parking for the project proposed adjacent to Lak<’ Minnetonka east of Highway 15. These parking spaces will also allow the entire marina (Minnetonka and Tanager) to conform to existing parking ordinance requirements. % Variances Required. 1. Setback. As noted, a portion of the road entrance and road connecting the entrance to the lot will be within the 75 foot setback from Tanager Lake. The area falling within the setback has been minimized and is required by Hennepin County to provide sufficient sight distance for traffic. 2. Hardcover. The proposed project would require a variance in both the 0-75 foot zone and 75-250 foot zone. The hardcover area within the 0 - 75 foot zone would be 3,295 square feet. According to the ordinance, no hardcover is allowed within this zone without a variance so a variance would be required for the entire 3,295 square feet. The hardcover area within the 75 - 250 foot zone would be 9,299^ square feet or 53.57% of the total area within this zone. The ordinance allows 25% hardcover within this zone so a variance of 4959 square feet or 28.57% percent would be required. (See hardcover calculation sheet). Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions. The property has been used as a commercial marina for over 45 years. The property is not deep enough to allow the construction of the parking area without a hardcover variance The access road is required to encroach within the 0-75 foot lake setback due to Hennepin County highway requirements for sight distances for oncoming traffic and persons entering or exiting the lot. The construction J^.dJs to the safety of marina operation by providing parking near the slips located on Tanager Lake. Presently, marina customers must cross Highway 15 to access the slips. This Highway is heavily traveled and poses a safety risk to pedestrians trying to cross the Highway during certain times. The extra parking provided by this proposal ensures that the entire marina (Minnetonka/Tanager) meets all current parking ordinance requirements. 10/^/96 eS:53 NO. 62*r 004 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION : ORONO, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 25. 1996 PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY : SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC ) m ‘ NOTE : ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING - / SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION : WEST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 SETBACK ZONE: I 0^75-250’250-500'500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) DOCKS TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = 25 SF 25 SF ■*( TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75 ) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) * 45,111 SF 0.06% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION : WEST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 SETBACK ZONE ; I oTsl 75-250’250-500’500-1000’ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER ITEM LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = SQUARE FEET (SF) ENTRANCE DRIVE GRAVEL TRAILS DOCKS 2.950 SF 320 SF 25 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (0-75’) =» PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75') = 3,295 SF 45.111 SF 7.30% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION 10y25yS6 06:53 NO.624 005 PROJECT : MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS LOCATION : ORONO. MINNESOTA OCTOBER 25, 1996 PREPARED FOR: GENMAR PREPARED BY ; SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. / NOTE ; ALL AREAS DETERMINED BY PLANIMETERING SUBJECT : HARDCOVER CALCUATION WORK SHEET LOCATION : WEST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 75-250l 1 SETBACK ZONE:0-75’ I 250-500'500-1000’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE SQUARE LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = FEET (SF) V HARDCOVER ITEM TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250*) = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250') = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75’) = OSF 17.360 SF 0.00% FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION LOCATION : WEST SIDE OF C.S.A.H. NO. 15 75-250lSETBACK ZONE:0-75’I 250-500'500-1000' PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE SQUARE LENGTH (FT) x WIDTH (FT) = FEET (SF)HARDCOVER ITEM ENTRANCE DRIVE GRAVEL TRAILS PARKING LOT 24 SF 24 SF 9.275 SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (75-250') = TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE (75-250) = PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER IN ZONE (0-75*) = 9,299 SF 17,360 SF 53.57% FOR THE PROPOSED CONDITION 9-626 % f\DV li if *> f h • V I ‘ .) ’ - ItJo ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& |\ I Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo Rosene. Ancvrhk ona AssocitUes. tnc is on Affirmotive Action Equol Opportunity frrployvr Pnncipols Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • M.irvin L Sorvdl^ PE • Richrird E Turner. PE • Glenn P Cook. PE • Thom;»s E Noyes PE • Robert G Scnunicnt. PE • Jerry A Bourdon PE • Robert W Rosene. PE «ind Sus.m M Eberlm C PA Senior Consultt^nts Associate Pnnciptifs How«ird A S.mford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfefferie. PE Richtird W Foster. PE • D<^vid O Loikotii. PE • Robert C Russek A I A • M«^rk A H^^nson PE Mich,u*l T R»»utm.inn. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson PE • Mark R Rolfs PE • Sidney P Williamson. PE . L S • Robert F Ketsmith Offices St Paul Rochester. WilJmar and S: Cloud MN • Mcquon Wl s jc November 4,1996 ■^0,1. . \ n n t ' Mr. Michael P, Gaffron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 NOV. fr 1996 Re: Genmar File No. 139-2195 ^« M A Dear Mike, We have reviewed the grading plan for the proposed gravel parking lot for Genmar (Minnetonka Boatworks). The plan provide.s 28 parking spaces. The lot elevation is shown approximately 6 feet above CSAH 15. A 15-foot berm and a few trees will remain between the roadway and the parking lot. A 22-foot berm and the majority of the trees on the site will remain between the shoreline and the parking lot. The grades, drainage and erosion control measures show'n for the parking lot are acceptable from an engineering standpoint. The skinuning and ponding basins should be expanded to accommodate the runoff from a 2 Vi inch rainfall to meet the NURP standards in th^City’s Subdivision Code. The plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review and approval. The plans should also be sent to the Department of Natural Resources for their review and comments. A few thousand cubic yards of excess material will need to hauled away from the site. The haul route, disposal location, construction schedule, and traffic control plan should be submitted to the City for approval prior to commencing with the work. The applicjint should be responsible for cleaning the surtace oi any paved public street that becomes soiled due to the construction activities on this project. For saF^y reasons, in times of inclement weather or early thaw, the City must have the authority to stop all hauling activity on the project until such time that the City determines necessary. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 55113-3898 • 612-636-4600 j STATE ARCHAEOLOGIST ID: Jeffery Melby Cenroar Holdlngji. Inc. 100 S. Fifth Street, Suite 2400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 NUV J J No .uut> t .ui M November 13,1996 REt Topographic Feature @ T117N/R23W, Section 11, NEy<inMW)4 (Hennepin County) Dear Mr. McIby: As we have previously discussed, the above feature was examined in-field by this office on 11.05.96. The above indicates that the hummock is a remnant glacial feature similar to other such features found in the immediate area; it does not appear to be a dredge pile and is not.an a prehistoric burial mound. While the prominence of the hummock may have made it a likely spot for a small archaeological or burial site (atop the hummock), the feature has been extensively impacted by prior excavation which would have destroyed such a site. Nonetheless, pl2a.se note that MN Stat 307.08 (overview enclosed) prohibits the disturbance of human burial sites or remains; you are to contact this office immediately in the event that human remains arc inadvertently uncovered or otherwise discovered at any time during project development. Contact me directly if you require any additional Information or clarification. Sincerely, Mark J. Dudzik State Archaeologist enc. oc: J. Jones, MI AC Port SnoUing History Cunter, St. Paul, MN 5S111 Tel: (612) 725-2411; FAX: (612) 725-2427 •SIPTB PRCHHtULUblSI lU :IMUV lO 30 I ^ ^ i MU.V^V-^W • Omce of the SUte Archaeologist Fori Snolling Hlitory CcnUr Lfk <<1« 725.i4ll; FAX («« 725-2427 MiooMoU Suiute# 13831-138.42 and 307.08 re„Wi.hed in 1963 the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) Is charged with sponsoring, conducting and l^labhshed u 1963 th .. archaeology of MinnesoU; protecting and preserving ., .4 lufM e..,.uie« 11831-138 42 licensure through ihe OSA is rex^uired for field archaeology undertaken Under MN Suiutes 13831 • . iq the Daramount right of the state or its subdivisions, as .he .„,..pri.>cne« of .•K.rcbj.e h»doloo, See.inc .he W,e, of .he adverse cCfecls lo kn licensed lo conduct such investigations in the -- ..4 eoeaa^e.. ro, hc„,»,e c. h. obtained by contacting the above address Mifii»caota-8 "Private Cemeteries Act* (307.08) affords aU human remains and burials older than 50 years, and r Jo-iXunS. oi sutule applies lo burials on either P«P ' ^ conducted under the sole lidiTn oeonles, the OSA works in concert with the Minnesota database of identified burial sites in iho slate. TT. OSA .uo . d.uh« ENVIRONMENT JUNE, 1980 6. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. The Harza Study, the 208 Water Quality Management Study, and Orono's Surface Water Management Plan all recommend this approach to permanent water quality management for Lake Minnetonka. In addition, the Orono Plan goes on to identify individual wetlands and marshlands that require protection as part of the City's storm water management program. It is the policy of th-s plan to effectuate the policies and recommen­ dations of the 1974 Orono Surface Watrr Management Plan. 7. PROTECTION OF THE CITY'S MARSHLAND, WETLANDS AND DRAINAGEWAYS SHALL INCLUDE PROTECTION OF ADJOINING LANDS AND PREVENTION OF DRAINAGE, FILLING, DREDGING OR WETLAND'S VEGETATION REMOVAL. Ordinances will establish setbacks for all land alteration or construction. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 9. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection will • be encouraged. 0. LAKE BED ALTERATIONS WILL BE DISCOURAGED BECAUSE OF ADVERSE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY. Dredging of lake beds releases large amounts of otherwise trapped nutrients and silt which adversely affects water quality for long periods of time. Dredging of new channels or inlets will not be approved to provide riparian access where none existed naturally. Dredging will bo permitted in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. i II U (.1 CMP 3-20 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 3. 4. 5. DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WILL BE LIMITED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO A LEVEL WHICH WILL NOT OVERLOAD THE NATURAL SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND FILTRATION SYSTEM. Urbanization increases the speed and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. Developed land use densities will be determined by comparison between known levels of volume and pollution generation and known marshland capacity for ponding and nutrient assimilation. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION- AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. Wetlands, drainageways and floodplains will be protected from encroachment and from alteration or destruction by filling, grading, excavation or drainage. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage ease­ ments for conservation of these lands. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, Orono will prohibit overly dense development 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive * boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to pi^ovide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reason­ able in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear- cutting will be prohibited. in areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. CMP 4-13 4 n ! i I I ‘ » I I I * . ; I * 'I ‘I I • It 1 i 1 j 1 4 1 ] 4 4 1 4 1 1 3 9 J LAND USE JUNE, 1980 13. 14. 15. 16. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT. Land development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features always produces more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DEVELOPMENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. Whenever required, improvements must be provided by the developer. Because the City has limited staff and limited bonding potential, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to increased land use density. In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the , case of unusual land uses or building configura­ tions, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform. City- established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. DEVELOPERS MUST DEDICATE LANDS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. CMP 4-15 «• 1 • :nd 3ocio wer), MOV 6,1996.4i20 PM OODRt'ES lUDUlNV REPOUr PUR SHORELI / TANAOER Rape: p!e«3 • • 3 «*0 A.N*ip &'.iide: 16 OL’L’nU.b?3 - - Reporting Di3tric!‘: 4 % C^»co No CR966439 Inv Ddte Codt? 11U496 9 9«XC DoQcripliCK sruRD 31 Jt».*5 TA.: 133UED •CF.966364 103196 9 9C*02 BPI GD TAG IS3ULD CK960974 10119/. J 3300 DWe-MISD clemred i>v arrest r.r:76601S 10j;'.96 9 9<.'o2 3PELD Tfiw' IbPULU •% Cf<966000 101?9to 9 9002 lin-ED ASSISTED rR‘?<'.!:9Mn 100096 9 9n02 3FEPD TAfi ISl’iUED CR965805 100796 9 9002 SPEED T...7 IBLUfD CR9oL»04 1 10utiV6 V 9002 bPEED rr. _. jbSUEi) •Crx96*j039 H.>orj96 9 9002 3PEEC TACi :SbLLD Cl:?6t^./9l 10«»396 J SZOO r.i LmI\' Q i.»V ArxRECT V* 0\^h*oij9b 09299O M 4lo4 LIQUOR - FOSEcBSiN TAC ISSUED •CR9f,b69j 092996 h 4104 LIQUOR - PQb^bS.ilN Tmo IbSULD CK96:i/l9 .92B96 9 9002 £)n.t:D lAb ISSUED 1 r.K7^*J470 091/96 7 9<j02 BPEPD TAD ISSUcl) 1 *CK9654/6 091796 9 «0«:'2 SFI/2D 13.0 131UED Cr*>96r‘.'76 o6‘»476 9 9313 PROPtRTV 1 OUN'l ASSISTED 1^ t:rx96J6«>0116V6 9 94 jr,P1 - noA as ;, 13 TED 1 V.rr9:*i/9? ^Y 2: 30 OR IN AONbT C jGVI . UM ,,LLa PEI) DY ARRbLT crv95 ‘’4 7:.112293 9 9200 OT VIOL ASS 13 TED • LR73^3IjU 101091. J 35«.'0 DU I-N13D CuEARCD DY AKRE3T 1 CR93!5737 0903«5 9 9002 SPEED TAG ISSliEi: 1 JMf??.ULlO Ul£D, NUV 6,r?96,4:20 FM oDURt3B INQUIRY REPORT 1 OK SHURCLI / TANAGKR l-'agoi leg, Dy: 330 • No No LRS53(S9: Inv Date Codi? 06119S 9 9803 D*.*ibC r ipL 1 pr» ANIMAL CailfLAll.TS 3» ASSISTED Cr<953l30 032193 9 90'*2 bPELD r.i) ibisUEU CR9!i270A 030493 9 9U0i^ar I1I3C PUP A2SI31LD (:h951G44 033093 9 9002 3f ECD 1 »B IS3UED • ' LR951241 030393 9 9797 U'iRRAiiT ARRLS^..S3IS TED Cr<9 4/772 111994 9 9002 bPLED t.Vj I33ULD CR94534G »:»01294 9 9G00 Cl M.5C PUD obsisrE'j *-1:R943302 032894 9 9002 3FPf 1)■ IbGUEU Cr.743l4 3 032294 J 3300 DW1-MI3D C.EAlvtl) PY AKPEbl r.r<94974 022194 9 901 1 OFLtD W6KN .»3 SI 3 TED CR936971 121293 9 9002 3PEEU 1A0 Ib’-HJEO r.R9366fl’112093 9 9«X>2 brEtO TAi is.»u5:d Cr\‘* 36446 11109: V 9002 BP Et c T.'.S ISEJ'iD -f3t9T6:30 111493 9 9002 3PCLD IF.EUbI) CR93633/:il4<^3 9 9002 SPEED Thi3 uojum: CK936r'2 110973 9 9v 02 bf EEL UMi issue D *• CR9T6l3li 110793 9 9002 t-’ ELD IhS IbiUbD I'r 776'n <*»iio:9*. V V‘.»l 1 S» ELD-U mCN A'bK.irD •* : \ • • ' • 1 1 » *%<.» . *• 'if 1 •- "• t *; *• T >0 ^ ,r'>. I CR93£337 CR*>3<S192 CR936155 CF7r.6200 CR9:i)9'U CK935V39 CR9T.393H cr<7:.39n6 Ck93Ail36 111493 9 9002 110993 9 9002 110793 9 9002 110393 9 9011 102093 9 9002 102093 9 9002 102093 9 9002 102793 9 9002 100793 9 9002 sraED BFL-;cU SPKEO SFEtlD-WMKN SI«Et£n SPEED SFEi:0 OFEFD GPELD Ih G IBOUt.D Ini, lS‘:ULli I'r.oUEl* ASSISI f:d TAG IS:';UEE TArS ISGLLD TAi? IGSLilD TAG 7 SSI JED TAG ISSUED l.R9:.5348 09.:V93 9 9* *02 ‘jPLEL*T*^‘j ISGUtD ■- IMD30C10 >jaLD, NUV 6,1996,4:20 PM ADDRESS SHCJRtL 1 INO'JIKY REPOr^T I-OR / TAMAG c Fx Pa.j«: 3 Roq. Dy: .’o - 1 No C au « N o CR933347 Inv Date Code 0('script ion 09299 ’ V 9002 bPtflj .»t'« tu ^ TAG ISSUED C?2;33170 062B93 9 90t.*4 rAG/DnJV/DAC TAG ISSUED m CR9.3253b 060193 E 4700 isc-uM-Forr an ds -f Cl LriREl) DV ARREST - Clv932322 051973 P 3319 irvESFnS'3-MS FF Fir G0> CR932164 051193 A 3242 (iQLT r-SUDiJTPNr JAL CLEP*RbD DV ARREST CR9.32161 051193 9 900*1 INS'JRANJE VIOL TAG !GLUED - CR9267A6 121092 9 9002 GfEtD TAG IGGl'ED 1 CR92676r>121092 9 9002 Ghr.F.D ion ISLIIUL' CR924017 000192 9 7770 SICK CARED rOU AEGISTCl)- CR924016 0S0192 T 2230 CMM Acrisr t,a»;N-OK CU:.4*.ED BY AFvRLST 1 N. LR923394 070392 7 9005 ANIMAL COMPLAIN IS assigifd CF<92179 011292 7 9*:*02 GF CKl)TmU IGSlIbD CR91319U 103091 9 9000 TRAKFJ': VIUL (Ar» IGSUFil* ••CR9 14443 091091 9 7997 W.^FiRANr AFvK'LET ASSrSTLD CR9 11636 O.M091 9 9(.»00 TRAE^ IL VIUL TAG ILGULD - CR912G43 161291 V 9O00 1KOFKIC VIUL T^.U I^ilMED 1^ t:f;9 12522 061171 9 7*j00 TF.AFPfC OiUL "AC IGSULD 0912453 060791 9 9000 VRiFFtr: VIOL r.-iG ISSUED - Cr<9 12360 r*60471 9 7o*H»IF./iFf IL VIUL r-io insuu) CR9 12206 •060191 J 2900 TR»V FIC-OK DTHLR 2'JVLNr LE CHAT rai l CR911470 011691 7 9000 IF'AI FIL VICl TAU ISSUED CF;9 1 1464 04'591 7 9000 TI'AFFIw Vlt'L Ir.U ISSUED ::i:9l 1463 041591 9 9c*o*:*Iivnrric viui.ISGUED CR91 1461 041491 9 70‘>0 TIVAMMC VIOL TAG ISGUrO lNr/3‘**’.IO UED, NUV 6,1996,4:20 PM mDURKSS INlM'IF^Y l-:ferORr roR GHUFLLI / TAMOUER F'oqo: 4 Rcq. Dy: 53E* ----- ------ -------------------------------- - M.-l CA*a» No cr 911307 Inv Dart? Cod«.‘ 040991 9 9000 Dcti( r i r t i Ciri Ti;%rrii: viol S' Atn«s TAG rSSLED 0911306 04'.'991 7 9000 TRAFFIC VlGl TAG IGSUGD CR9ir:22 0 10371 9 7000 TRAIFfC VIOL TAG IGGIJIID - Cr^'; il20?«»3297l 9 «:^o<»o Tfwr IL v:oL •AG IGEULD cr,9 111 11 032271 7 •rOOO Tf^^EFlC VIOL •iAC- IT3US0 i-cm 10G7 n32071 9 90»:*o TRArPIC VIUL jL'S ISGL'PD -• CR9 11032 031791 7 7000 TRAFPIC VIGL ToG If SUED 1w a.9M592»^'111370 9 *KK*0 TltAFnC vini Toy ISGULD t rP9657l5 • «>2Uir 7 9o02 SPLKP fA.v IGL'.'c.D * V. 1420 TO 1475 SHORELINL^ CAOE-NUMbEFi RP f-YM RPT-DAY PR IMARY-OPr ENSE-DEGC NUMBE R Ei rFxPET-NAME L L L L L L L L L L C C L CR CR CR cr< F'.K CR> r:Fv- .:r- CR- CR- CR- CR- CR CR- lR- CR- CR- 91-0000Q0421 1 •92-0000003706 •93-0000001940 •93-0000002487 -93-0000007152 •93-0000007153 93-0000007173 -93-0000007174 •94-0000003733 •93-0000003340 95- H:»000<;0564Ei •95-0000006742 96- 0000001047 •96-0000001623 96-000UUO1713 •96-0000002042 96-0000003169 91/09 92/07 93/04 93/05 93/12 93/12 93/12 93/12 94/06 95/03 95/OQ 95/in 96/02 96/03 96/03 96/05 96/06 /05 /17 /2B /30 /21 /21 /21 /21 /13 /20 /30 /17 /26 /26 /31 /24 /07 MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE NVA PROP DAMAGE PI-MVA MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DaMAGC MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE MVA PROP DAMAGE PI-MVA MVA PROP DAMAGE PI-MVA HIT h r^UN PROP DAM PI-MVA 1444 1449 1444 1449 1475 147 3 14 75 1475 1442 1444 14-14 144 4 1444 1444 1444 1442 1444 5HCJRELINE BHUKELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE 5HURELIME EHO^^ELI^:E SHORELINE GHORELIME 5MUKC.LINE bMUPELINE 5H(JRELINE GMURLLINE BHUKELINE 5H0RELINE SI ICJRELINE SI lOREl.INE SHORELINE i LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT IN RE: APPLICATION OF MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS (ORONO) The hearing on the application for a special density license and new dock license for the Minnetonka Boat Works was held at 7:30 a.m. on April 8, 1989, at the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District offices, City of Wayzata. The Applicant was represented by Mr. Byron Heimark and Ms. Beth Whittaker. The Applicant owns property in the City of Orono having frontage on Brown's Bay and on Tanager Lake. Applicant seeks approval to expand its facilities from 41 to 47 boat storage units (BSUs) on Brown's Bay and from 25 to 67 BSUs on Tanager Lake. The property has 3310 feet of frontage, including a breakwater. Counting the frontage of the breakwater, the proposed facility would provide one slip per 29 feet of frontage. Without the breakwater frontage there would be one slip per 19 feet of frontage. In either case, the proposed is well within the maximum density allowed under LMCD Code, Section 2.05. The amenities proposed by the Applicant changed during the course of consideration of this matter, partly in response to concerns expressed by the LMCD, the City of Orono or the public. The final proposal is as set forth in the following Order. Owners In the vicinity of the proposed facility expressed concern about additional boat traffic on Tanager Lake and the Channel between Tanager Lake and Brown's Bay v;ith the associated impact on aesthetics and safety. However, the Board finds that the review criteria of LMCD Code, Sections 2.03 and 2.05, are met and that the amenities hereinafter set forth are sufficient to justify Issuance of a special density license for the proposed facility. The District has prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the proposed facility and has concluded that the construction and maintenance of the facility will not have a significant adverse environi.iental Impact. J ORDER On the basis of the foregoing, it is ordered that a new dock license and special density license be Ranted to the Applicant on the following conditions: 1. The licenses are granted for construction and maintenance of facilities for 2. 47 BSUs on Brown's Bay and for 67 BSUs on Tanager Lake in accordance with the dock plan attached hereto as Attachment One and hereby made a part of this Order. The licenses are conditioned on the continuing maintenance of the following public amenities, each of which has been suggested and agreed to by the Applicant. a. One slip shall be maintained for use by the Sheriffs Water Patrol for c. d. e. f. g- emergency purposes, b. Licensee shall provide a boat for charter purposes to groups or individuals at least three times per year at no profit to licensee and shall annually report on the same to the District. Licensee shall provide boats with a professional guide for fishing excursions for underprivileged or handicapped children or adults, at least five times per year, providing access for approximately 25 such persons, at no charge, and shall annually report on the same to the District. Licensee shall maintain a public pay phone. Licensee shall maintain an MCWD approved skimming and ponding basin for runoff. Licensee shall maintain landscaping on the grounds. Licensee shall provide a loading zone for Tanager Lake customers, allowing such customers to load a boat at the Brown's Bay facilities which shall be handicapped accessible, h. Licensee shall maintain one additional restroom on Tanager Lake side. i. Licensee shall make available its shop boat for emergency use by fire departments which add the name of licensee as an additional insured on liability insurance policies, The licenses gfranted herein shall confer no vested rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka. All such use is subject to continued regulation by the District to assure the public of reasonable and equitable access to the Lake. By Order of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors this ^^^day of , 1990. C ') ') ■ : Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District LKllO-011 •I i JAI^ 2 Y REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; January 23, 1999^ 199? ITEM NO,' Co Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: ^2200 Mr. & Mrs. William Ellis, 2435 North Shore Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA Lot area = 56,938 s.f. or 1.3 acres Application: Applicants seek approval of lot area, !ot width, side setback and hardcover variances within the 250-500' setback area to allow construction of a new residence on the developed property. The new residence will be installed in the approximate footprint of the existing residence. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1.Section 10.23. Subd. 6(B) A. Lot area \ ariance Required = 87, >20 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 56,938 s.f or 1.3 acres Variance = 30,182 s.f or .69 acres or 34.6% B.Lot width variance Required = 200' At 75' setback = 120' U shoreline = 127' Variance = 80' or 40% C.Side yard setback variances Required = 30' East side yard Existing = 16.2' Proposed = 16.2' Variance = 13.8' or 46% West side yard E,xisting= 13.5* Proposed =13.5' Variance = 16.5' or 55% Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 January 23, 1997 Zoning File #2200 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover variance. A. 250-500' setback area = 24,278 s.f. Allowed = 7,283.4 s.f. or 30% Existing = 8,889 s.f. or 36.6% Proposed = 8,877 s.f. or 36.5% Variance = 1,593.6 s.f. or 6.5% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Existing/Survey F - Proposed/Survey Gl-4 - Hardcover Inventory H - Dicon Addition, Original Plat Approved by City 10/73 I - Elevations J - Floor Plan K - Marfield Letter 1/7/97 Description of Request ' Applicants seek approval of multiple variances to allow construction of a new residence on the developed lot. As structure will be located within the approximate footprint of the existing structure, the residence v ill be razed requiring a demolition permit from the City of Orono. Three of the variances sought by applicants involve variances to the lot standards of the LR-IA Zoning District. At the time the Dicon Addition plat was approved by the City in October of 1973, the R-IC Zoning District r.*quired 1 acre in area. The existing residence constructed in 1974 required no variances to the R-IC zoning standards. Review Exhibit H, note the lot to the immediate west in the original plat was not a lakeshore lot. In 1995, the ow ners of the three lots w ithin the Dicon addition applied for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement that involved the vacation of the original road platted within the subdivision allowing direct access for the three properties at North Shore Drive. The property was granted lot width and area variances in the rc.solution approving the 1995 subdivision. Review Exhibit F, note the location of the a\ erage lakeshore setback and the wetland restricts placement of structure on property. The lot is 100' wide at the existing and proposed building site. The structure would be limited to a 40' width to meet the 30' side setbacks of the LR-1A Zoning District. In the redesign of the residence, the applicants attempted to maintain the same setbacks as Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 4 January 23,1997 Zoning File #2200 the existing residence and maintain hardcover within the 250-500' setback area at same level proposed at 36.5% (existing 36.6%). The City has received no negative comments from the residents notified of the proposed variances Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit B, hardships are reviewed as follows: 1 . At the time of the original subdivision in October of 1973, all three residential lots met the standards of the R-IC Zoning District. 2. 3. 5- 6. 7. In 1974 at the time of the issuance of the building permit, the existing structure met all required setbacks of the zoning code. Resolution #3653 adopted by the City Council on December 11, 1995 granted a lot area and lot width variance to the subject property. The lot measures 100’ at proposed building site. If a new residence was installed meeting the required side setback, the structure would be limited to a 40' width. There are no excesses of hardcover within the other setback zones. Applicants have maintained hardcover at the existing level of hardcover proposed at 36.5%, existing 36.6%. The existing residence and accessor>- improvements within the lakeshore yard will not extend beyond the average lakeshore setback line. Structural coverage will not exceed the allowed 15% at 8,541 s.f. Structural coverage is proposed at 4,680 s.f or 8.2% 8, The property is served by municipal sewer. The Planning Commission was asked to consider if reductions in hardcover in the 250-500' setback area were needed. They were also asked if the east and west side setbacks should be increased to more closely conform to current code. The Planning Commission felt the application as proposed was acceptable finding the excesses of hardcover located some 250’ from the shoreline and side setbacks consistent with existing residence and structural improvements on adjacent properties in subdivision. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #2200 WHEREAS, William H. Ellis and Carmelita W. Ellis (hereinafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 2435 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Scotch Pine Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a residence on a property that consists of 56,938 s.f. or 1.3 acres where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres is required, the lot width measures 127' at the shoreline and 120' at the 75' setback line where the code would require 200', the structure will be located 16.2' from the east side lot line and 13.5' from the west side lot line where the code would require 30'. The application also includes a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 as proposed improvements will require a hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area proposed at 8,877 s.f. or 36.5% where 36.6% exists and where the code would allow 30%. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2200. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. Page I of 5 3. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 21, 1997, and recommended unanimous approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. In October of 1973, the Dicon Addition was approved by the City. All 3 residential lots within the plat met the required standards of the existing R-IC Zoning District. B. In 1974 at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the existing residence structure on the property, the structure met all required setbacks of the R-IC Zoning District. C. Resolution #3653 adopted by the Orono City Council on December 11, 1995 granted a lot area and lot width variance to the subject property at the time of a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. D. The property measures 100’ at the legal building site. If a new residence was installed to meet all the required setbacks of the current LR-IA Zoning District, the structure would be limited to a 40' width. E. No hardcover exists within the 0-75' or 75-250’ setback areas on this property. F. The proposed new residence and accessory improvements will not extend beyond the defined average lakeshore setback line. G. Structural coverage will not exceed the allowed 15% at 8,541 s.f. Structural coverage is currently proposed at 4,680 s.f or 8.2%. H. The property is served by municipal sewer. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor Page 2 of 5 ' i•?i pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely ser\'e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and w'elfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of a new residence at 2435 North Shore Drive granting a renewal lot area variance of 30,182 s.f. or 34.6% and lot width variance of 80' or 40%, an east side setback variance of 13.8' or 46%, west side setback variance of 16.5' or 55% and hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area of 1,593.6 s.f. or 6.5%, subject»to the following conditions: 1. 2. Applicant's contractor shall obtain a demolition permit for the razing of the existing residence that will also include securing of municipal sewer connection and other utility connections serving residence. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (Januarv' 27, 1998). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 i '4 4.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of January, 1997. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Deputy City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor William M. Toles, Property Owner William H. Ellis, Applicant Carmelita W. Ellis, Applicant STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COLR n ITY of HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of January, 1997, by Gabriel Jabbour &. Linda S. Vee, Mayor & Deputy City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of ___, 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of ___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of ___, 199 _before me a Notary Public within and foi said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 Application H Date Received QI, Amount Paid ^ .cz> CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 ' (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00// After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) «*. » *•» PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / 7 IV Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquire d __________ I (do) (5o n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: J^jesidential ___other (specify)______‘ Zoning District: L|2.1/^_______________________________________ (month/year) APPLICANT , ^ ^ Phone (home) Name Phone (work ) ' AMtqss: l-TylC? Citv: Zin: 5^:^/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constmction Cost $ . (9tP/D Describe request in detail: __________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area >< Lot Width Setback:Front Xs Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other ^specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: _______________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) 12/20-'96 FRI 12:00 FAX 612 478 8080 □•C-20-96 10:12A T0L-0-)L\TIC v7 5- OS/o /i @000 P . 03 IS UKQUIRFJ) SUDMITTALS I / All of Hic follnwitip information must l>c subnuHftil liv the iinplic;itii>n tlcnillinc tliWu it» order for VQiir npplienUon to be considered comnlctct » I 2. 3. 4. 5; 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Govt Center, 348*3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8’/j" x 11'■ for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade ore proposed. In addition, provide onc (I) copy 8'/i” x 1 I" for reproduction. .Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/a" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include namc(s) of applicant(s) if not current owncr(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Properly Owner imusl sign this application. Please remember that yotir vnrlnncc application U not cnmnlcte If the nhnvc information lins not been included. AIM'UCANT'S SIGNATURK The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff lime not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this applicalion, and ceriifics Ihnl the information supplied is true and correct to the best his/her knowledge. Date 7k^. />. OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City^>t^ff, -onsultants, agents, Commission mcnibers, and Council members for pvirposcs ol j^^e§)i^tioi"i antTV^/ilicalion of this request DoteOwner's Sigonture Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days’ before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Mond.iy of each month. Applicants must be present at nil scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 RUN DATE 12/2A/96 BATCH 001PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 09-117-23 ttl 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED CHARLES A DIR6ITTA SCIIOEN CHARLES A BXR6ITTA SCHOEN 2430 NORTH SHORE DR HAY2ATA MN 5S391 HENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST38 09-117-23 44 0002 02465 NORTH SHORE DR DUANE A LUKE ETAL DUANE A LUXE 2465 NORTH SHORE DR NAY2ATA Ft! 55391 REPORT NO. PX435401 PAGE 138 09-117-23 44 0003 02425 NORTH SHORE DR DOROTHY C LEVY DOROTHY C LEVY 2425 NORTH SHORE OR HAYZATA HN 55391 f- t I PROP AOOR GttCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR TOTAL BATCH 001 00003 38 09-117-23 44 0008 0009 & 0011 S S & J C MARFIELD SAMUEL S & JOYCE C MARFIELD 2455 SGOreH-RiNE-LA jj. , m Shcr, h WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 44 0010 2435 NORTH SHORE DR WILLIAM M TOLES WILLIAM M TOLES 2-165 IIORT-H-SHORE DR- WA^FZATA-MN—55391 % Jci'6 ‘ JiU^' (Vaf SS 3i O I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF T'-E HE«4EPIN COlAfTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KFK)NLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE to ry Survoy For l Crainer Coropany Book 348 Page 47 File ?fT.7 1 \ 4 rtM. jfa.^ Scale: l''=50' oDenotes Iron Mon. Found Topo by Others / Sq.ft, area In lot Area In abandoned incl (Scotch Pine Circle) Area In House & Garage Areo In Playhouse Area In Pool & Deck Sidev^a Ik Area In Priveway Total Area Hardcover 16.7% of lot 56938 sq.ft. 3550 " '• 64 '• •' 25 20 '• •• 70 " '• 3325 '• " I h«»«bjr MT% fMl Na • ku« Md eenact »ufv.y ol th. boun<M.« ol Lot 3, Block yj^^^'p^COn A — ~——__________________________________________________________M«»viap4n Coirnty. Minnatola and lha location oVall buflc9nga dial Suivayad by me on tda________________day of 1996 aclinianti. If any on said land. Frank R. Cardarelle State Reg. No. 6508 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250’ 250-500* ** 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ X Length Width *•- ! •4'B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck X X X F. La.-it’ccape __ Unii'irlain __ Hv Plastic X X X X X X X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ B X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN 7.0NF. A. House X Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY A.<EA IN ZONE -i- B ^ n X 100 . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length X X X 75-250*.250-500' Width 500-1000' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage S.F. C. Driveway X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck X X S.F. S.F. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. , -• . *•>, f ) TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ■r B - PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length B. Garage X X X X 100 = Widlh _ S.F. _ S.F. O % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • C. Driveway S-'. D. Sidewalk i E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •i- B O X 100 = S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. % HWIiliir W »0SK fanE lOvTAlOH*] • • i II 1 * .*if} t:i .1 :) •'4. • * » • 1 *' J| / J ^ ■■■ K- ••. • .V ••:. •' ;>*'^''** •^ - vvCj A .:f*». *' : *^WW ' •» •* A* •V '». ■ :■ • . A * •» • ^s^jn-j- t&ijfcv. . IN . . *V _____|"i«k -----------j rwt. <.\ *v* \^5^>r^::7WeL i '•' ■ > ^ *>-. ^ >i >'1 J-'-J "i ^*1 f • % — y ••■ 1'>w ^ fe I?-'-^.y-^ % :i ^ 3V ^ I "vv* V >">/> -f io I ,4-r-> *• •- " • WnJ’'f :Il" Tri f I /' T.4 1 «».■!M ;■.» K ■ V>-»< t .*-■ \4 • •• • . 1 SAM AND JOYCE MAWIELD 2455 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA, MN 55391 VOICE 612-473-3344 FAX 612-473-2363 CELLULARS 991 -3344, 4444, 6666 & 6711 ftf- January 1, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY P. O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 JAN 8 1997 Voice: 473-7357 Fax: 473-0510 Re: Land use application #2200 Ellis/Toles Dear Planning Commission Members: We are the owners of 2455 and 2445 North Shore Drive. They are legally described as Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Scotch Pine Addition. We have reviewed the variances described in the notice the City of Orono mailed to us. This is the notice which shows a proposed publication date of the week of » January 6, 1997. We approve of these variances and look forward to the construction of a new house next to us. Yours very truly. SAMUEL S. MARFIELD ' ^ A; V -. V : V. JOYCE C. MARFIELD WEST ON 12 PAST ALL WAYZATA EXITS TO WEST 15 EXIT. 3.3 MILES ON WEST 15 TO A MARINA - ONE MORE BLOCK RIGHT ON 51 • !< MILE - LEFT ONTO PRIVATE STREET ^ X'^OC2> To whom It may concern:V yj We have no objections to the request of Mr. & Mrs. William Ellis to replace the residence at 2435 North Shore Drive with a new residence. Duane & Nancy Luke 2465 North Shore Drive JAN 1 4 1997 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JA/\J ^ j DATE:Hfjf^^^^}997 ITEM NO ■■-I 1997 19S >A/0 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Request for Payment #2, Kelley Avenue Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City ’s engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve this Request for Payment if J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& |\ I Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk snd Associates. Inc. is jin Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer Principals Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C Anderiik. PE • Marvin L Sorvata. PE • Richard E Turner. PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • Thomas E. Noyes. PE • Robert G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon PE • Robert W Rosene. PE and Susan M Ebenm. C PA . Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert P Pfetferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskoia. PE • Robert C Russek. AIA • Mark A Hanson. PE • Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R Rolfs, PE • Sidney P Wilfiarrson. PE. L S • Roberi F Kotsmith Offices St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cioud. MN • Mequon. Ufi 40a January 9, 1997 II n jrrrsa m' J0rih-J09u City 0.' Orono 2750 Kelly Pkvvy Orono, MN 55323 Attn: John Gerhurdson Re; Kelly Avenue Sanitary Sevver Improvements Our File No. 13982 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the 2nd and Final Request for Payment for the above referenced project. The project underraii the original bid amoimt by $16,070.00 or 40 percent. This work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend the City Council accept the project and make final payment. If you have any questions, please contact me. YouiS ver^’ truly. BON^TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLDC & ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO;gs Enclosures 1 1 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 • 612-636-4600 l/ll Bonestroo HLB RIekmip Owner;City of Orono, 2750 Kelly Parkway. Orono, Minnesota 55323 Date;January 9. 1997 n AnderikS ■1 ■ AccnriafM For Period:July 22.1996 to January 9. 1997 Request No: 2 & Final 1 toL,Contractor:Widmer Inc., P.O. Box 219, Si. Bonifacius, Minnesota 55375 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT KELLY AVENUE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Flic No. 13982 SUMMARY I Original Cvatract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contrac. Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 0% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ $ 2 & Final Recommended for Approval by: BONESXROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. $ S s $ $ $ s Approved by Contractor: Widmer Inc. Approved by Owner: City of Orono Specified Contract Completion Date:Date: «i 40.595.50 40,595.50 24,525.50 0.00 24,525.50 0.00 24,525.50 22,717.83 1.80'' 67 l:\139\13982\REQUEST.WB2 No. Item 1 8" PVC, 0'-8' deep in place 2 8" P.E., 8’-10 ’ deep in place 3 8" P.E., IO’-12’deepinplace 4 8" P.E. 12'-14* deep in place 5 Std. MH 8‘ deep, 4’ dia., w/1642B cstg. 6 Manhole Depth greater than 8' deep 7 Connect to existing 8" VCP 8 Remove & dispose of existing sanitary sewer MH 9 Light weight aggregate or woodchip bedding 10 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch 11 4" PVC service pipe in place 12 4" PVC riser pipe for service 13 Connect to existing 4" service line 14 Improved pipe fnd. per 6 “ increment depth 15 Mechanical trench compaction 16 Erosion control fence 17 Seeding with topsoil, mulch & fertilizer 18 Sod with topsoil 19 Remove and dispose of existing bituminous 20 Sanitary sewer television inspection 21 Removal and disposal of unsuitable material 22 Clearing and grubbing Total Work Completed to Date Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price Quantity to Date Amount to Date LF 373 26.50 373 9,884.50 LF 105 32.00 48 1,536.00 LF 30 32.00 0 LF 40 32.00 0 EA 2 1,100.00 2 2.200.00 LF 4.9 75.00 0.50 37.50 EA 3 150.00 3 450.00 0.00 EA 2 150.00 2 300.00 0.00 LF 150 20.00 189 3,780.00 EA 6 300.00 2 600.00 LF 160 15.00 37 555.00 LF 20 25.00 10 250.00 EA 6 150.00 2 300.00 LF 500 1.50 458 687.00 LF 708 1.00 458 458.00 LF 800 1.50 0 AC 0.25 1,200.00 0.25 300.00 SY 2,000 2.25 0 SY 750 2.25 750 '1,687.50 LF 548 1.00 0 CY 500 4.00 0 LS 1 1,500.00 1 1.500.00 $24^25.50 i:\13S\13982\REQUEST.WB2 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner City of Orono Project No. 13982 File No. 13982 Contractor Widmer Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No.Date Description Amount 1 2 3 Total Change Orders • PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 Start 07/22/96 22.717.83 1.195.68 23.913.50 2 07/22/96 01/09/97 1.807.67 24.525.50 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $24,525.50 Original Contract $40,595.50 Retainage. Payment No. 2 &Change Orders Total Amount Earned $24,525.50 Revised Contract $40,595.50 l:\139\13982\REQUEST.WB2 ^^/Vo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '"’/V p ^ DATE: JanuSfi^/^m? °^*0(VO ITEM NO -a Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Repon Item Description: Request for Payment #7, Brown Road Reconstruction Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City’s engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve this Request for Payment 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene ^5 Anderlik& |\ \ Associates t Engineers & Architects January 8, 1997 Bonestroo. Rosene. AnderUk end Associates. Inc. Is en Affirmetive Acvon/Bquel Opportunity employer Principels Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. • Marvm L Sorvala. PE • Richard E Turner. PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • Thomas E Noyes. PE • RcOeri G Schumcht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • Robert W Rosene. PE and Susan M Eberiin. CPA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A Sanford PE • Kfth A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE. • David O Loskoia. PE • Robert C Russek. A IA • Vark A Hanson. PE • Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE • Sidney P Williamson. PE . L S • Robert F Kotsmith Offices. St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud. MN • Mequon. wi 40d, John Gerhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Brown Road Reconstruction Water Tower Road Culvert SAP 152-107-01 &SAP 152-103-01 Dear John: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the 7th and Final Request for Payment for the above referenced projects. The project overran the revised contract amount by $48.05. This project has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend the City Council accept the project and make final payment. ^ If you have any questions, please contact me. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO:gs Enclosures 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113*3898 ■ 612-636-4600 mPngkwM Bonestnxi AnderOkA Assodates 4Vdill»cli . Owner City of Orono, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 5323 Date December 5, 1996 For Period December 6,1995 to December 5, 1996 Request No.7 Final Contractor Buffalo Bituminous, 2852 County Road 12 North, Buffalo, MN 55313 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT MUNICIPAL STATE AID IMPROVEMENTS BROIVN ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - SAP 152-107.01 WATERTOWN ROAD CULVERT - SAP 152-103 01 File No. 13972 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 V'alue Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 9 Sub-Total 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. Final Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROjf ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCUTES, INC. $ $ 81,884.90 7 Final Approved by Contractor: Buffalo Bituminous, Lnc . Approved by Owner: C ity of Oorono , MN Specified Contract Completion Date: June 16.1995 Date; $566,506.50 $648,391.40 $648,439.45 $0.00 $648,439.45 s 0.00 $648,439.45 $618,647.47 $29,791.98 Itcn Unit CoBtnct Qnanti^ Unit Price QtuutUty To Date Ajdoob I ToDaU Brown Road North Part A . Street • SAP 152-1Q7-01 2101.501 Qearing (tree) 2101.506 Grubbing (tree) 2104.501 Remove concrete cu«'b A gutter 2104.501 Remove pipe culvert 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement 0104.601 Relocate mailboxes, signs, etc. 0105.609 Geotextile fabric. Type V 2105.501 Common excavation (P) 2105.507 Subgrade excavation 2105.521 Granular borrow (CV) 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV) 2211.501 Aggregate base, CIS, 100% crushed quarry rock 2331.504 AC-1 bit. material for mixture 2331.508 Type 41 wearing course mix. (1995) 2331.510 Type 31 binder course mixture 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture 2331.518 Bituminous mixture for walk SP-1 Drivewav restoration 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat 0412.604 Modular block retaining wall 2451.511 Coarse filter aggregate (CV) 2502.541 4" perforated PE pipe drain 2506.522 Adjust frame and ring cstg. 2521.50 1 4* concrete walk 2531.501 Concrete curb & gutter-Design B618 SP-2 Reinforcing for cone, curb & gutter 0531.602 Pedestrian curb ramp 2563.601 Traffic control 2564.531 Fum.& inst. sign panels. Type C 0564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) paint 0564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) epoxy 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow epoxy AC AC IP LF SY LS SY CY CY CY CY TN TN TN TN TN TN SY GL SF CY LF EA SF LF LF EA LS SF EA EA LF LF 0.2 0.2 40 540 10,300 1 14,400 12,000 1,200 600 1,850 9,700 231 1,050 1,400 1.750 530 550 1.500 1.300 50 850 4 20 7.230 360 5 I 37.5 1 1 5300 5.500 2,000.00 2,000.00 4.00 7.00 1.25 500.00 1.00 3.25 4.00 10.00 5.00 8.50 125.00 17.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 10.00 l.OO 13.00 10.00 7.00 200.00 5.00 5.00 0.50 125.00 5,000.00 35.00 30.00 50.00 0.20 0.20 0.2 0.2 30 460 10,115 1 14362 12330 1,200 1,850 10.434.58 226.37 1,033.34 1,409.33 1.567.76 624.4 558 1.200 uoo 50 297.5 4 109.9 7,189 250 1 44 400.00 400.00 120.00 3.220.00 12.643.75 500.00 14.362.00 40,722.50 4.800.00 9,250.00 88.693.93 28,296.25 17.566.73 21.139.95 23316.40 18.732.00 5380.00 1.200.00 16.900.00 500.00 2,082.50 800.00 549.50 35.945.00 125.00 250.00 5.000.00 1340.00 100.00 13,247 2.649.40 t RP4 V Item 0564.603 4* brokeo line, yellow paint 05 64.603 4 ” broken line, yellow epoi^ 0564.603 4* wide solid line, white paint 0564.603 4* wide solid line, white epot^r 05 64.603 6* solid line, white paint 05 64.603 6 ” solid line, white epoxy 0564.603 24* solid line, white paint 0564.603 24 ” solid line, white epotgr 2571.501 Spruce Colorado Blue 6' ht B & B 2571.502 Maple Sugar 3” caL, B & B 2571.502 Ash Summit 3” CaL, B & B 2573.503 Silt fence, preassembled 2575.501 Roadside seeding 2575.502 Seed, muxture 500 2575.505 Sodding, Type lawn 2575.511 Mulch material. Type I 2575.519 Disk anchoring 2575.523 Wood fiber blanket 2575.531 Commercial fertilizer, analysis 20-10-10 Total A • Street - SAP 152-107-01 Part B-Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 2501.515 12* RC pipe apron 2501.515 15" RC pipe apron 2501.515 24" RC pipe apron 0501.602 Trash guard for 15" RC pipe apron 0501.602 Trash guard for 24" RC pipe apron 2503.511 12" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Des. 3006 2503.511 15" RC pipe sewer (CL V) Des. 3006 2503.511 18" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Des. 3006 2503.511 24" RC pipe sewer (Cl. V) Des. 3006 SP-3 Construct catch basin, Des. 3-4 SP-4 Construct catch basin, Des. 3*6 SP-5 Construct CBMH, Des. 3-5 SP-6 Construct inlet control structure Uatt LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA EA LF AC LB SY TN AC SY CoBtrad Quantity Unit Price Quantity To Date Amount To DaU 500 500 100 100 320 320 60 60 SO 25 25 700 1.5 150 9,400 3.0 1.5 200 0.7 RP-2 0.20 0.20 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 157.00 235.00 235.00 2.00 150.00 3.50 1.40 150.00 55.00 1.50 400.00 43 SO 25 25 374 U 150 8,870 3 1.5 0.7 228.75 53.75 7.850.00 5.875.00 5.875.00 748.00 225.00 525.00 12.418.00 450.00 82.50 S392.195.96 EA 3 400.00 3 1.200.00 EA 2 425.00 1 425.00 EA 1 550.00 1 550.00 EA 2 300.00 5 1,500.00 EA 1 500.00 1 500.00 LF 410 23.00 410 9.430.00 LF 470 25.00 470 11,750.00 LF 684 31J0 684 21.546.00 LF 156 33.00 156 5.148.00 EA 2 500.00 2 1.000.00 EA 7 700.00 9 6.300.00 EA 11 uoo.oo 10 12.000.00 Itcn Unit Contnct Qaastity Unit Price Quantity To Date Amount To Date Design 4-2.4 ’ dia.EA 1 1,150.00 1 U50.00 SP-8 Connect to exist, storm manhole EA 2 300.00 13 3.900.00 SP-9 Cut into existing storm sewer OC1 1 Cni D ran n IIT • FlPl EA rv 1 300.00 0.00 6 1.800.00 mm ■ —I— mm mmmw mm m —w - — Total B-Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 Watertown Road Culvert $78,199.00 Part C - SAP 152-103-01 2101.501 Clearing AC 0.3 2.000.00 0.3 600.00 2101.506 Grubbing AC OJ 03 600.00 2104.501 Remove pipe culvert LF 64 20.00 64 1,280.00 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement SY uoo 1.25 1333 1,666.25 2104.509 Remove guard posts EA 40 10.00 40 400.00 0105.609 Geotextile fabric, Type V SY 2.600 l.OO 2.445 2.445.00 2105.501 Common excavation (P)CY 1.450 3.50 1.450 5,075.00 2105.521 Granular borrow (CV)CY 600 10.00 1573 1375.00 2105.523 Common borrow (CV)CY 1,000 6.00 1,019 6,114.00 2105.535 Salvaged topsoil (CV)CY 300 6.00 287 1,722.00 2211.501 Aggregate base. C1.5.100% crushed quarry rock TN 1.500 8.50 1481.79 12.595.22 2221.501 Aggregate shouldering. Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock TN 130 10.00 75 750.00 2331.504 AC-l bit. material for mixture TN 18 125.00 23.18 2.897.50 2331.508 Type 41 wearing course mixture TN 135 17.50 135 2.362.50 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture TN 180 16.00 276.82 4,429.12 SP-1 Driveway restoration SY 30 10.00 30 300.00 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat GL 100 1.00 100 100.00 2451.501 Structure excavation. Cl U (P)CY 750 4.00 1.800 7.200.00 2451.511 Coarse filter aggregate (CV)CY 120 14.00 90 1.260.00 2501.511 12* CM pipe culvert LP 50 24.00 160 3,840.00 2501.511 48* RC pipe culvert.CU.Des. 3006 LF 124 140.00 112 15.680.00 2501.515 12* CM pipe apron EA ■?70.00 7 490.00 2501.515 12" RC pipe apron EA 1 400.00 1 400.00 2501.515 48* RC pipe apron EA 1 1,270.00 1 1.270.00 0501.602 Trash guard for 48* RC pipe apron EA 1 950.00 1 950.00 SP-7 Construct inlet control structure. RP-3 Item Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price Qnantity ToDaU Amonat To Date Design 4-2,6* dia. 2511.501 Random rip rap, CL IV • DELETED 2554.501 Traffic barrier. Des. B8307 2554.509 Guide post. Type A 2554.511 Anchoring assembly • plate beam 2554.523 Twisted end treatment 2563.601 Traffic control 0564.603 4* wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4’ wide soUd line, white paint 2573.503 Silt fence, preassembled 2575.501 Roadside seeding 2575.502 Seed, mixture 500 2575.505 Sodding, Type lawn 2575.511 Mulch material. Type I 2S75.S19 Disk anchoring 2575.531 Commercial fertilizer, analysis 20-10-10 Total C - SAP 152-103-01 EA CY LF EA EA EA LS LF LF LF AC LB SY TN AC TN 1 28 500 82 2 2 1 1,100 1,100 300 0.4 40 700 0.8 0.4 0.1 1,200.00 0.00 10.00 25.00 200.00 450.00 5,000.00 0.20 0.20 ZOO 200.00 3J0 1.50 150.00 75.00 400.00 Alternate Bid - Contractor shall bid cable cone, in lieu of random rip rap. Base bid for rip rap will not be paid in this case. Brown Road North Part B - Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 SP-IO Cable concrete, CC-20 Total Part B • Storm Sewer 1 500 80 2 2 1 1,100 1,100 300 0.4 40 672 0.8 0.4 0.1 UOO.OO 5.000. 00 2.000. 00 400.00 900.00 5,000.00 220.00 220.00 600.00 80.00 140.00 1,008.00 120.00 30.00 40.00 $92,959.59 256 5.00 1 •>.<tn on S 1.280.00 Watertown Road Culvert Part C-SAP 152-103-01 SP-11 Cable conerete, CC-35 Total Part C - Culvert 320 6.00 320 1 on 00 $1,920.00 0412.604 Change Order No. 1 Brown Road Part A - Street - SAP 152-107-01 Modular block retaining wall 13.00 RP-4 7,423.00 CoQlract Unh Qoaatity Amoaot No* lUm UnU Qnaatity Price To Date To DaU 2571^01 Spruce Colorado Blue 6’ ht B & B EA 15 157.00 15 Total Part A • . $9,778.00 Part P • Stonq Sewer • SAP 1S2-107-01 2S01.S IS 18’ kC pipe apron EA 1 475.00 1 475.00 0S01.602 Trash guard for 18* RC pipe apron EA 1 400.00 1 400.00 2503^11 12" RC pipe sewer (a V) DBS 3006 LF 31.0 23.00 31 713.00 2503.511 15" RC pipe sewer (a V) DES 3006 LF 92 25.00 92 2,300.00 2503.511 18'RC pipe sewer (Cl V) DES 3006 LF 112 31.50 112 3,528.00 2021.501 Mobilization LS LS 3000.00 LS tnnnnn Total Part B S 10,416.00 Watertown Road Part C - SAP 152-103-01 2501.515 12’ RC pipe apron EA 1 400 1 400.00 2503.511 12’ RC pipe sewer (Cl v) DE 3006 LF 100 23 100 4 2.300.00 2571.501 Spruce Colorado Blue 6* ht B & B EA 28 157.00 28 4,396.00 2571.502 Ash Summit 3' cal B & B EA 40 235.00 40 9.400.00 SP-ll Cable cone. CC-35 SF 192 6.00 192 1 i«»7nn Total Part C S 17.648.00 Total Part A 9.778.00 Total Part B 10.416.00 Total Part C 17 fan no Total Change Order No. 1 - ADD S37.842.00 Chanse Order No. 2 2331.500 AC-1 bituminous for mixture TN 92 125.00 92 11.500.00 2331.510 Type 41 wearing course mix TN 1507.96 17.50 1507.96 26.389.30 2357J00 Bituminous material for tack coat GL 450 1.00 450 450.00 564.603 4* wide solid line, yellow paint LF 14.214 0.20 14,214 2.842.80 ] RP-5 t k Unit CoDtnKt Quantitj UnH Price Qoantltj ToDmU L. 564.603 4* wide solid line, wUte paint Total Change Order No. 2 14304 0.20 14304 • - ;a* » -• Total A • Street • SAP 1S2-107-01 Total B - Storm Sewer - SAP 152-107-01 Total Part C - 152-103-01 Total Alt. - Part B Total Alt. - Part C Total Change Order No. 1 Total Change Order No. 2 Total Work Completed to Date RP-6 ABOOBt To Dale 9.8(Sn Rf) 44,042.90 392,195.96 78.199.00 92,959^9 1,280.00 1,920.00 37.842.00 44iU2.90 648,439.45 i 2 r PRO.IECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner Project Project No. FUeNo. Contractor City of Orono Brown Rd. Reconstruction / Watertown Road Culvert SAP 152-107-01 / SAP 152-103-01 13972 Buffalo Bituminous CHANGE ORDERS No. Date 1 1/15/96 Provide additional storm sewer, retaining wall, trees. 2 1/16/96 Provides for bituminous overlay & striping. Total Change Orders - Add PAYMENT SUMMARY Total Payment to Date Retainage, Payment No.7Final Total Amount Earned $566,555.80 0.00 $566,555.80 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract RP-7 § Amount 37,842.00 44,042.900 81,884.90 No.Period Payment Retainage Completed 1 Start 10-1-94 $18,536.40 $975.60 $19,512.00 2 10-1-94 11-8-94 229,898.24 13,075.51 261,510.15 3 11-8-94 2-13-95 66,723.01 16,587.24 329,800.85 4 2-13-95 7-13-95 78,034.51 20,694.32 411,942.44 5 7-13-95 9-20-95 94,361.97 25,660.74 513,214.87 6 9 20-95 12-6-95 49,209.69 28,250.73 565,014 J5 7 12-6-95 12-5-96 29,791.98 0.00 648,439.45 \ $566,506.50 81,884.90 $648,391.40 ^Nq REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION crryOff DATE; ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: 7 Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report /Item Description: Resolution of Appointment to Fill a Vacancy on the City Council The City Council at its January 13, 1997 meeting, declared a vacancy on the City Council and directed staff to prepare a resolution of appointment to fill the vacancy for the January 27 Council meeting. A resolution to make an appointment to fill the vacan.y on the City Council is attached for Council adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution to appoint___to fill a vacancy on the City Council. ri A RESOLUTION OF APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL 1996,and WHEREAS, Gabriel Jabbour was elected to the position of Mayor on November 5, WHEREAS, Gabriel Jabbour resigned as Councilmember effective January 2,1997, to become Mayor, and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 3832 Declaring a Council Vacancy on January 13,1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, appoints______________________________to fill the unexpired term of Gabriel Jabbour. THEREFORE, BE IT ADDITIONALLY RESOLVED, . that ______________must run for election at the November 3, 1998 election and win in order to be a Councilmember beyond December 31, 1998. Adopted by the Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held January 27, 1997. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Deputy Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: ITEM NO: ^ ^ 19sr 0 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Cil)' Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Park Commission Vacancies (' There are now two vacant positions on the Park Commission. The City has received applications from nine candidates interested in serving on the Park Commission. The Council may want to schedule interviews with the candidates as the first step in filling the vacancies. The applications are attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to indicate the process to be used to fill the two vacant positions on the Park Commission. •k • • • • m • /o \\ li i: li . V .-TT-». •• ij! - ••V, *'•• •‘.r.v ‘.i'.s” li MtirJcpal CS» PcK OfSct Box ^ ^ • CrvrjJBav,>lL'uie««s^i>^W6.--------- h!i ••• «^ .■sV.-*"i O TXLEPK0NB--175-7357 • EA-K--.73-0510 MAY 1 2 1995 ’I • iot: ~n3 rr-TZ^y advisor ? COieilSSlONS APPDICATlOil rOR Con-u^ission n Parks Ccr-T.ission 2. Planning Corr.aission □Con.-ur.ity Task force (Ma-.e) Nsm0 yj.mgpvJ Address 3020 .c AScO_£^iHi— post office s Zip Code ,^53*=? L Telep'none m-||-030M (W) ^ ) 3/m vearsResident of Orono ----LJ----- Work Experience: ^f^dLSdt^ MgNjj<dih ^ Accdyji - mo ~crz - ei IMco^ Education j V Cr — L,. • t • * ' * ^ f-ino to S01TV© on this Commission state your reasons for sheet if r (Please be as specific F . necessary-) ^/u -----------------~~^. i A"I '^ •r-^T-re. a<jrr>r^O -----CL2 T n- ,.,^^-f- xh> edr^jil^ ^1 |,--f€ we "* f ✓*> { •4->n / f\//^ // -^).-k/i/i^t€ -h /'•Vg SSS^^ -fAc/f-Gr< /1,/w c.W '<’ ■ tv'riogfg4--a!^ ^ I......................... ^ -I 4-he ConnnissioD? w-hat is your view of the ” " ------Tl jTZ^'N -rAe/^^>ryLi ----^"TITZ^ \ . f ^ ^ r%-/ i~- ^ 77*vn re^ /v\ Ia/€, slso ^ ‘ consider.) ' CrtUy't'r^ ^iv- kve- /'KfyY-est.f ec^rte.rtresoTsd />a^T.T€. t-i ^ K1g7t>vJ----------------- T -n <4- <-f !-ru/rx -------- L MAY i? crECIAL MArl^ETS CU'tTOfiEiF 'rc-rvii.E StarlHbune N c w s p A p £ n c f The t v/ i ?4 cities DISPLAY ADVERTISING 425 Portland Ave., Minneapolis, MN 53488 r • i . i. . • .• ‘-f Mur-'dcal Cr/J=J - ras^aosz-iryT^si • E\:t-T3-05io 3i?Fij xCA ;ica roa cr.-TxaN sDvisop.r cokhissioks Ccmnissicn -cc* P 3 r .<s jrN c^nr-’^nitv Task Force (Ma-e)••u*» ^ ••• ttsr^® Address *• cf?i Telephone ResiSe!": of Orono l ! C .H. '^2 /C »~»‘ & Zip Cods (K) _^7/- Orono y>Jr/ W5.«* vears. "^^clanning Cor.T.ission v r (W)^7?- /toV-y; • • Civic and volunteer <T^ __ '(A/^-rt /— Actlvltioa (P*st and present) s ^ c. — ✓ V,- .' V •■• ^ •a»* # o /r/iT < iri I * MAMIE M. JIN 3721 Casco Avenue Orono. i-'M 55391 Heine: (612)^71-8369 Vior.<; (612)673-7089 NOTABLE MANAGEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS o Restructured and managed a manufacturing service business to reverse a net loss in the previous year to a net profit in the following year. Developed and installed a production control and inventory tracking system v.nich reduced inventory levels by $500,000 in a turnaround situation. Ccorainatec the reorginizaticn in a mid-sized company from functional cepartments to four business units while implementing multiple work redesigns for one of the units. Conceived and initiated an excerimental team which reduced errors by 50 percent and cut turna.''Ound time by 66 percent. Developed business plans and financial projections for start-up companies which resulted in the attainment of bank financing. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY o o Star Tribune. Minneapolis. MN: 2/90 • Present 1992-Present. Director of Planning and Administration (Marketer Customer Unit) o Coordinate end facilitate business planning, budgeting, reporting, resource allocation, end decision making. Integrate culture and organizational change strategies and efforts. Provide leadership in the definition and establishment of business and quality measurements. Assist market groups 1n developing cuallty/customer satisfaction strategies and coordinate efforts. Provide financial end operations management for department, which Includes facilitators and specialists. 1990-1992. Customer Quality Systems Manager > o Manage special projects, including formation of a customer satisfaction program, support of redesign efforts, development and management of sales incentive programs, development of nev/ advertising policies, generation of soecial financial analyses, and initiation of customer satisfaction data collection. o Provide financial and operations management for the Advertising Customer Satisfaction Department. o o Grant Thornton. Minneapolis. MN': 5/88 • 11/89 Senior Management Consultant o Advise ana help clients to improve profitability and business operations, c Prepare and present seminars for enhanced client service and lead aeneration. Ditec Corporation, New Hope, MN: 6/81 - 5/88 1985-1988. Controller and Operations Manager o Coordinate ard manage operations area. ^ c Oversee accounting functions, including production and analysis oi financial statements and management of cash accounts, o Direct efforts for new medical product ventures and produce business plans. 1983-1985, Project Manager o Develop and imiplement the company's new computerized database and accounting systems. o Initiate new quality/statistical control programs and processes. EDUCATION College of St. Thomas. St. Paul. MM. '^asters in International Mar.aoeTsnt . Additional CoLirsework: Corporate Marketing. Venturing. Strategic Manage.ment, University of Minnesota. Minnsaoolis. MM. Bachelor of Arts. Major; Political Science: Minor: Speech-Communications. Aoditionai Coursework: Accounting (degree equivalent/approved for CPA Exam), Business. Economics. Organizational Development. Professional Development Seminars; o Star Tribune: DO! Interaction Mgxt: Larry Hiller's Design for Total Quality AQP Fall Forum: Emerging Issues in Participative Leadership Ajnerican Marketing Assoc: Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Quality Grant Thornton: Sales and ProposeTSeminars University of Minnesota; Industrial Eng Mgmt: JIT: Leadership Oevel Prog Princeton University; Business Tcmmorrow VIII Conference (i of 2 students cnosen to represent the University of Minnesota) American Management Institute: Project Planning and Management Seminar Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing (3M): Phil Crosby’s Quality Improvement through Defect Prevention; Basic Statistics and Process Control c o o o o o o HONORS AND AWARDS c Star Tribune Finance Division Award for Outstanding Employee Contributions (Awarded within 4 months of employment) Who’s Who in American Colleges and Universities Julie Carson Scholarship for Leadership in the Minnesota Union University of Minnesota Student Leadership and Service Award - Granted three times Order of Omega Honorary Fraternity: Rho Lambda Honorary Sorority o o o o o o o c o o o o CURRENT AND PAST ASSOCIATIONS AND AFFILIATIONS o American Production and Inventory Control Society (CPIM Certified) o Association for Quality & Participation. Regional & National Team Competition Judge Katahdin. Board Member Anoka County Chamber of Ccmmerce. 9usiness/Educ Partnership Chairperson Leadership St. Paul Program. St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Minnesota 100. Program Participant/Mentee American Society for Quality Control. MM Quality Conference Committee Maple Grove Park & Rec Board. Board Member Minnesota Council for Quality, 1991 MM Quality Award Examiner U.S. Tennis Association. Team Tennis Co-Captain Minnesota Union Coordinating Board (Policy making board for University Current Events Prograrriming Coordinator Greek Release Newspaper. Editor-In-Chief REFERENCES References, a consulting resume with itemized projects, and/or a complete list of business accomplishments, business courses/training, and past/present activities, honors and awards will be furnished upon request. 1• •» .• t* Municipal OCcca Post OiEce Box 65 . C ttsu I Bay, Minnesota £=^23-0065 . «TYOF ORSNO TTT ypHQNE - 473-7357 • EOC-473-0510 SEBU^TIi - U----- APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSIONS _TO iW 19S5 - ..ease s.3.e -sons ° ^ r please be as spec •• necessary.) lifelong interest In conservat ion I.want to be. of ^prvtce to my community-.- I have a ------------------------ ---------------, « nr-rinn’s Qualitv of life. ParTc planning issues and want to help enhanc_e .and preserie^no -------------------------------------- —---------------------------------------------. - _«,.af!nn<5 I want to help develop an is my avocation anii my legacy for future ^^ - ^fi^gTaSedSSS: xixi2.ens'» n —ml""'........... ^" rninntsaloner ^„.,..rnmenr'-iI finii rlir nrlvare aeirnr'- Inrereats . ^ • ^l40ctiOQ. P ^ nltfc- lit* b° rir ^^t^uc-TfoT- rm paiJs. fnr nrn"^ —-------- ?%\“at°oc “yoS"wouia°lllce — Sfg!' too'Say °. . . . . .a t naue .een in “ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -° ■, wth the Water ■’r.^rnl so I have^ _rhoroueh knowledge of t- -^ rL the _2ast.I^ZiS*” . . ............. r-n - -r.fetv and enulrr^nmental lssu_^-------------------------------------- worked witn tn---------------------------------^ _ irrr-f iP • fViP PeDUtv resDong^ble for sen;— _1„ M ,n Hnnnfhl" « . J: □_„ tlm irllUff llfe-tbai^o . Tifi fr ^—cnu I nriYv Uiv.s - nrlllze your parks ana . X am an avid hiker, biker, and in this .tranquil setting- A 9 mmeeting « Oi 2Ji3§. ^ Date .. • APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION .V V r GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Commission Applying For: ^ Parks Commission □ Planning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name) ___________________1 Nam e S> Address (jOg^-V- Post Office & Zip Code Or OOP 5 5*3^4 Telephone (H) S~?Z Resident of Orono ”7 years, Work Experience: ^UlIo\\<L. r> S VAc. <r^c=»r \AOQg^LOglV p<sAVI>^\<'- Q,CN €-V v ::>o5 r Tr" ' Qg Education: ICncAg <pc?ry\ gr^'V ^cG~ i lC«=>==os CAo\\jgr3\ArQ>'V S ^ rr frVg,^ f^c:.-Vu:)n-^"3 ^ 3cv^\oy^ LLaVs/gc'SiV^ Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): LOcs"^ ^c-V/o CV^<=(pV<2..~ M.\r>r\cs>c:>^*^ L«^r\cX UUil<3vg--r \^ores~V. ^V^Aog Sa. fvj LACYNg r cv.^s ^rcrVv^c?<^5 >Oc.-V''DrN-=-V Vou<crc=A Telephone (612) 47M357 • FAX 473-0510 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) T~ ^ Of DAO ^C^cX vV ( f ^-cCrr F. . JX~ Y-^\^'a S p<3r^crr>^( -C/r»^ C\-K^'"=> pv~A.V>V.\C- S(p«^<^g-S'L Spor-Vs V rgc.r<g^-V-ilsxn^J <-\pVr^o'5 -Tor C n Vi^ZC o^ ^A\ Vo Q-f o».ogo ______ \ V\"\} <r trAg'O <?l ^prr*g.r> V ~~^ 3 Ov-O^V"^ . What is your view of the role of the Commission? ~Tb Sgr\)g -H^g Ci-K-^ CC)^JO>e\\ \c\ W% <rAcpc\^Tv>o ^ yg \ <--V-ec::X -bo ~Wg oi-V-t^^s p<^./^S._______ Other Comments: {Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you feet is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. w 'Vi !‘^\e Date **NOTE: Signature Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. 040896.2 APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION 4 ru GITYofORONO dec lvi9o Municipal OfTIces Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailini Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Commission Applying For: Parks Commission □ Planning Commission Z1 Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ Name <2 *S tp V 0/tvt-T— Address 0.1 Co Post Office & Zip Code 5"S"35"C-1 Telephone (H) Vi:(W) C(l- Resident of Orono I years Work Experience: I </gycr7 iAi cOgv>»vp*s ■ <rxo/fc/tMv, tks^ccrr itSn^tJL f'f&iUHi i^gLuOT^. »»m4 ig»*«g»jr Sui/ff’UaioyC. Education: QATCnAlA/Ttt CoxyCB(i€ ■ SJH iA<4 iT»/- to iA/^£.^cAO ^<n/g»4x)»*ig<jr/ UA-ri^ Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): *U-rT»< 0^ ifJP^ c LTV cKrC«ttu> C 1 1 ^ I - Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. [Phase be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) What Is your view of the role of the Commission? Other Comments: [Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) lA-r r_________________________________________________________------------- **NOTE:Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. 040898.2 Please state vour reasons for wanting to serve on this Cominissioii. My grandfather was a recognized and well-known conservationist and outdoorsman in Pennsylvania. As such, I grew up with a strong appreciation for the powerful role that natural open spaces can play in a person’s physical, emotional and value system development. Having lived in the city of Chicago for years, and then in a typical suburban Chicago "collar" community, our move to Minneapolis in 1995 was spurred by a desire for a better quality of life for me and my family. In Orono, we found a home with incredible open space and natural beauty-something we had always yearned for, yet was not accessible in Chicago. My objectives in being on the commission are fourfold. First, 1 have a desire to ensure that Orono's park resources are preserved for the future. My family and 1 are frequent users of Baker, the Luce Line trail, and Biederman park, and discover new natural resources regularly. I hope to foster the belief that our parks are an asset which help to build a stronger community and advantage all of the residents of Orono. Second, 1 want to ensure that the tremendous number of new residents to this area have an understanding of our Parks issues, and a cor -mitment to the preservation ol Orono's unique natural resources. As one living in an ,.rea with 14 new homes and additional construction nearby, I am uniquely able to solicit the participation ot these residents and ensure that the Commission's initiatives are communicated and understood. ^ Third, I have a desire to make a tangible, long lasting commitment to my community. The parks commission p-ovides an opportunity to create a legacy which will benefit future residents. I wish to preser\'e the natural resources which have made life here so wonderful for me and my family in the hope that others may enjoy it as we have. r What is your view of the role of the Commission? Webster provides five definitions for 'he word "park", most of which assume that the land is privately owned and/or utilized for some commercial purpose. However, there is one definition which I believe should guide the decisions and actions of the Parks Commission: "an area maintained in it's natural state as public property". (Webster's New College Dictionary/. My belief is that the Parks Commission must acknowledge and balance the concepts of demand, preservation, access, vision aiid accountability in carrying out it’s mission. ♦ Demand: The incredible growth of Orono and the western suburbs has put increasing demand and pressure on existing parks resources. This must be acknowledged, especially as it relates to future parks planning. ♦ Preservation: The need to preserve and protect the unique open space feeling and resources which attracted all of us to Orono in the first place. ♦ Access: The recognition that Parks resource must provide access to all Orono residents who fund the parks Commission ’s efforts through their tax dollars. ♦ Vision: A vision for the future of Orono and a mandate to anticipate, rather than react to, future parks needs and opportunities. ♦ Accountability: A recognition that the commission must be fiscally accountable for it's actions. 1 Other Comments As I pondered this application, I found inspiration in the words of Aldo Leopold: "In short, a land ethic changes the role of Homo Sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it. It implies respect for his fellow members, and also respect for the community as such." f Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac) I hope to have the opportunity to bring my talents to bear on the Parks Commission, whose decisions will have a long lasting impact on the city and it’s residents Thank you for your consideration. 4 r FRCDtl PJ-OE ^JO. : £12 471 0£72 D«e, 02 199£ li:2lwH Pi APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMIVIISSION Parks Commission Post-it" Fdx Mote 7671 C' ) C. »>. o P'®'" 3 / a; 7,> t Co-Oept.Co Fror./. H cS/O Fat .*#James C. Berg 2655 Lydlard Avenue Excelsior. MN 55331 ——- 471-7462, residence and 934-0064, business Resident of Orono 17 years Work Experience: Investrnent/insurance advisor, sales manager, marketing executive and sales trainer over the past 20 years. Education: Graduate of North High School, Minneapolis and University of Nebraska (B.S. in Business Administration); attended Master ’s Program at St. Thomas (1 year); attained Chartered Life Underwriter Designation (CLU) through course work at the University of Minnesota. Graduated with honors from both high school and college; invited to join Beta Gamma Sigma, business honorary. Earned 100% of college expenses through part-time jobs. ' Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): Active member in my church; active in fund raising, welcome ministries, and annual raffle (6 years). Currently, Board member of the following; Ridgedale Alternative Program (RAP), and Sales and Marketing Executives (SME). Member of Forty-Niners Business Development Group. Past Board Member of Network Professionals and Toastmasters International. Volunteer and speaker for various Job Transition Groups and churches. Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. My parents grew up in the Wayzata area and gave me an appreciation of the beauty of our area, and a respect for our unique natural resourcco. In addition, I would like to be more involved In my community; and friends have suggested serving on the Parks Commission. PRC»1 PHOHE HO. : £12 471 9£72 Lae. 02 199£ 11:22mm P2 What is your view of the role of the Commission? The Parks Commission is an advisory commission which researches issues and makes recommendations to the Orono City Council. Other Comments: I look forward to serving the residents of Orono. I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. . ...I'.V. . T. . _.t r- - ~ -I »-.l—. . - m > 12/02-96 08;5S FAX 612 379 4679 tri -tech ELECTRC 00111 ijO APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION '/V- ^ b' . t- • "• ^ '' CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mallinf Address: P.O. 001 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0D65 Commission Applying For: Q Parks Commission □ Planning Commission D Community Task Force (Name)__________ ___ Nama Shelly Li 1 1 prjii i ef Address 3490 Birch Lane Post Office & Zip Code Orono, MN 55391 Telephone (H) 612/471-7255 Resident of Orono (W) 612/379-<407 years Work Experience: _ _ _Employed as a bookkeeper for a commercial electrical contractor - Previously worked ii years for a contnercial general contractor. Education: GraduatP of Pohhi nsda le-Onnno'r Uiph *?r*nnr>? . pa ■in rn-rl i* from the University of Minnesota/ continuing education courses in Accounting and computer softxvare and hardware. Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): none Telephone (612) 475-7357 • FAX 473-0510 12.02-96 0S:5S FAX 612 379 4679 TRI-TECH ELEC'fRC ©002 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Phase be as specific as possible. Use addWonal sheet if necessary.) ■ ^ serve on points Cnninlsslon —m be;;;^ ? -ssn? ;o^s; O^ono •------------------------------existing fiatural envi ronr^■f^n t. Tr> rtn ^ ... somaone who can listen to all sides of the issue ^TTT^^TTtT- - stand baoc.and.ffuide through thoroucrhr well th;i;gh.. tong term gLls of the'cierof^Lono?’'i^mo{? «r.a balance benveen ell sides is vrhat natteTs^ " What IS your view of the role of the Commission? - I believe,thB.t_the rm<^ of ps.>-v< .eWea-.t^e w. 7 to take into account the Iona t«rnCentury growth strategy, while remembering our resources are'■rr-:—r-T- -;- - - -:- -:—r- - - - --- -—- -- - - - - - - - - -r_r. cire Cinite. Any aecisions that: u© make today v;iii hav® las^im ra-tt -, i-• for generations to come. Th^, comms c = -i ov.,.s 7^ , ^ ramificationFTTv should vorv Closely the -7 goide^ce :oTonn.ilet Other Comments: [Use this space to include any further information you .vould like the City Council to consider, or that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) g.r^1pyg<l...livinCT in Ornno t w=ir»p e-^s..., into the ne.tt .Qentury. The metropolitan area is experiegcing“S;;i;Lain. denands on it's limited nefirel resnnmes. is a . = ■■, .. . - - - -, ghgiJer.nggg It challenging decisions of the century. The hardI_ _ _ -nt^b be made if v.e are to );eep our city and our metro are* ■The^:^[;err:n;rj:^:^Lr^-!°u“;;^ these decisions will guide us into the next century and beyond. ■ ^_hajye no experienc e a.s tar p.s no t i f-•; r»e ■; <r u..i. r stro:ig sense or com.munity and have e strong desire to involved in roaking the right decisions not only for the current norm ^ i but I understand this appolmm^^^may'ba IPscusseff'a'f a piil^itPmye^ing. * 2 Decemhor IQQn Djite NOTE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number win become public information. oaactf .2 sVLo FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR W. Peter Enck * January 7,1997 M. 8 1991 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 f- r- n SUBJECT:Orono Parks Commission Dear Mayor Jabbour. I write to ask ^vorable consideration of the application completed by Shelly Liljequist. Shelly has applied for a position on the Parks Commission and I know that she would be an outstanding and conscientious contributor. I have known the family for some time and know of her specific concerns about the quality of the recreational activities that would be available for all of the citizens in Orono. She is also an advocate for the environment. If Shelly were still a resident in the City of New Hope we would be more than pleased to have her as a representative on one of our commissions. As you know, dedicated volunteers are very important to the quality of life for all of the residents. I would appreciate a favorable consideration and I am sure she will serve the City well. I would also like to take this opportunity to wish you the best for the New Year and hope that all is \vell with the city. Sincerely, Peter Enck Mayor City of New Hope cc:Shelly Liljequest Ron Moorse, City Administrator 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope, Minnesota 55428 Phone: 531-5100 Fax: 531-5136 •• — APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION \I. • y"t 1 isst GlTYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Commission Applying For: -^"^^rks Commission D Planning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)__________________ Name 1 \A> _______________________________ Address K^ Post Office &Zip Code____________ Telephone (H) "3^^^ _______________ 553^^ (W)^0030 Resident of Orono Work Experience: years /6 yj/n Education: iftphone (612)r 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 r' Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. (Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What is ypur view of the role of the Commission?is ypur view or me roie ot me uommissionr oyTT dJf *\ ^^V/ltuiA^U- 4\aL tyl/^ Will ^ Other Comments: (Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you fee! is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) I understand this appointrpenl may be discussed at a public meeting. ignature **NOTE:Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. 040896.2 - .• r» Municipal OCces Post OfBct Box « •niZPH0NE-473-r!S7 • E\X-47>051(> CITIZEN ADVISORY C0MMiM4?0?T# application for citizen auv commission Applying For: ps2^]<s Commission Planning Commission □ community Task Force (Name) Name ^ 9/C> /Oortf) /ffh Ca>^Address --------------- post Office & Zip code ^oe./ Telephone (H) Resident of Orono (W) % ^/z years Work Experience: ______^V/lW 1 y^./r^uc/y 7zc-?rs^ ^ liiTlrTT P Education *^rA Civic ana volunteer Activities (past and P r.Wr..r y/^.~ r (Please be as sped • ■ Hecessary.) . ^ iv.^oflCY___ • • • ■’ . ^ ..............^ ^ -7—“^ y I.. -k r.r« J-T -A«<» —iji'? , -■„.i.J M.' ,.........'^y ^^— 'T L,l:»^t 9h«L uf Ag ^/ik^ -k /6t /cfg ......■--■■.■<■ .........■■'■^—®—: rrm .mc •- ^-------—37 TTTwTJ 6f'tft. ^ol.-c^ tftA '' • ^ of the role of the Commission? What is your vxew of th ....... ^dSiLS----------— -TTZ^.^ „;,f,A ^ ■/r«t/(•h.(eCA fi Uf?k -Ag. r*i»'^-,{ ■■ .w..|,^>^ ,•;■>» «■!o« pr-ff ^ ,11 , I > I .7^ nr-fiM ^fjyvrsr Aruxi'-nlty t'* ^^\tlv* 4-0 include any further oV'bSr £om^«entr= (Vse this |P-=« ii“|o considar, or_^tbat ^ ^«aTiiafcion you would like the you are seeking, ^o y gu;S;i^isJeleva^^ A -1 ^ »viw. eli<iy- Ofjtrd' /^(K C^rcat/ * ^----------------------------- M * I / ^ -/-L >• - I"/. «>fgg w«</4( _ 'fV*(. y.' . •. at a pabll” . *. n,^,v be discussed at a P I understand this appointment may meeting- 3/^/5*^ Date ■■■■■!i ^ evu \'\^nsfeJ ^r/•H ^ ,v ^ urt c^tr ^ ^4/ £^.1/(4/ /i.i iCrw4.r/ w.rA.^ /i,<. *r T JA n S7 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ctry 19$; Op, Date: January 21,1997 Item No.V Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Administrative Projects Coordinator Agenda Section: City Administrator Item Description: Handlin Tax Forfeit Sale, 3860 North Shore Drive - Waive Sev,er & Water Reassessment On September 9, 1996 Council released a 20' x 100 ’ portion of City property for sale to Handlin to accomodate his existing driveway. This property had c*f,ginally been acquired by the City through a tax forfeiture in 1977, and the portion not being purchased by Handlin is mostly wetland. At the time of tax forfeiture there v.os an outstanding special assessment balance on the property of $1,535.13 for the 1963-lB interceptor sewer, 1965 LS-1 lateral sewer, and 1970 LW-1 watermain. Mr. Handlin's purchase price for the portion he is acquiring is $2,000. Of this amount, approximately 30%-50% will go toward County processing costs and the remainder toward this old special assessment, hence the City will likely recoup some significant portion of the assessment. Mr. Handlin has requested that the City c^nOtr;; it will not then re-assess the remaining balance of the old assessments, which would exceed ;>udget for this project. Indeed, the City has the right to such a reassessment of the portion nc: paid from the proceeds. However, it would seem unfair to attempt to recover old assessments for which the bonds were paid off long ago, especially since this 20' X 100 ’ property never really benefitted from sewer or water. Staff Recommendation Staff has drafted a Resolution confirming for Mr. Handlin that the City has no intent to re-assess the 20'xl00' parcel for the 1963-65 sewer projects nor the 1970 water project. Council Action Requesb.d Adopt the attached resolution. Proposed Motion: Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution No. Confirming City's Intent to Not Re-Assess Lot 23, Block 7, Crystal Bay View for 1963-1965-1970 Sewer and Water Improvements. Vote:___ayes,___nays. ____•, A RESOLl TION CONFIRMING THE CITY'S INTENT TO NOT RE-ASSESS LOT 23, BLOCK 7, CRYSTAL BAY VIEW FOR 1963-1965-1970 SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Lot 23, Block 7, Cr> stal Bay View, Hennepin County, Minnesota was acquired by the City of Orono in 1977 through tax forfeiture, retained by the City for Park and Recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, at the time of forfeiture, there was an outstanding spe J assessment balance on the property of $1,535.13 for the 1963-lB interceptor sewer, 1965 LS-1 lateral sewer, and 1970 LW-1 watermain improvement projects; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1996 the Orono City Council adopted Resolution #3768 authorizing the reconveyance of a 20 ’ x 100' portion of said Lot 23 to the County and approving public sale of said portion to adjacent property owners; and VV HEREAS, a portion of the $ 1,513.13 special assessment balance will be recouped by the City as a result c>f said public sale; and WHERE.AS, because said Lot 23 including the 20 ’ x 100’ portion released for pub’ic sale is not suitable for development of a residence due to acreage and wetland limitations, the property has not a id will not fully benefit from the previously assessed sewer and water improvemciili, and it would therefore be unreasonable to re-assess the property to recoup any portion of the prior unpaid assessments that are not recouped as part of the County’s public sale process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the City intends to not re-assess Lot 23, Block 7, Crystal Bay View for 1963-1965- 1970 sewer and water improvements. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 27th day of January, 1997 by a vote of____ayes and ____nays. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee. Deputy Clerk i CO(y/vc/^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1997 ^irvop ITEM NO: OftO/Vo Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: 7 Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Orono Ice Arena Inc. Water and Sewer Connection Charges The Orono Ice Arena Inc. as part of the Icc Arena construction project, is required to pay a number of costs. To this point they ha’,v luid the city's plan review fee and the Met Council's SAC charges at the time their building permit was issued. Remaining costs are the cost of extending the city water and sewer lines to serve the Ice Arena project and the water and sewer connection charges. The Orono Ice Arena Inc. has requested the city extend water and sewer as a public project, and assess the costs to the Ice Arena over the normal special assessment period (12 to 15 years). The estimated cost of this project is approximately $50,000. The city is moving forward with the process required to assess this public project to the Orono Ice Arena Inc. Five Year Payment Period for Water and Sewer Connection Charges Orono Ice Arena Inc. has also requested the ability to pay :■ e water and sewer connection charges over a five year period rather than at the time the building permit is issued (please see the attached letter from Orono Ice Arena Inc.). The total connection charges are $101,880 ($8,490 per unit X 12 units). The Orono Ice Arena Inc. has requested the connection charge amount be payable annually over a five year period with interest, and has indicated the unpaid amount will be secured by a letter of credit. Water and sewer connections are normally due at the rime of issuance of the building permit. The Ice Arena project is unique in that the project site is outside of the original sewer and water "assessment district", and the project is being constructed on public property by a non-protit organization. It is reasonable in this situation to provide some additional time for payment of the connection charges. If, as requested by the Orono Ice Arena Inc., the first installment of the sewer and water connection charges is minimized, it may be easiest to provide for four equal installments in the amount of $25,470 to be payable in January of 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 with interest to be paid on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 6%. If these terms of payment are generally acceptable to the Council, staff can de velop a form of agreement to reflect these terms. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to indicate the terms of the Orono Ice Arena Inc. payment of the $101,880 of water and sewer connection charges. • ORONO ICE ARENA INC. BOX 205 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 JAN 1.4 1997 January 14, 1997 Mr. Ron Moorse City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re; Orono Ice Arena Dear Ron: The City of Orono is today issuing its building permit for our Orono Ice Arena project, and we are paying fee of $25,262.25 ($10,800 for Metropolitan Council SAC charges on 12 sewer units, and the balance for the City's fees and costs) for that permit. We want in this letter to confirm the discussions we have been having regarding our obligation to pay an additional $101,880 (12 times $8,490) to the City in connection with that permit, for the City's separate sewer and water charges. ^ We have discussed a proposal that the $101,880 be payable annually over five years, with interest to be determined (perhaps based more or less on the City's rate of investment return), and with the unpaid amount secured by an acceptable bank letter of credit. We have not specifically discussed the amount of the dov/n payment on that installment obligation, but it would be helpful to us to have it as small as reasonably possible, especially given the letter of credit protection for the balance. In any event, we acknowledge that those charges are owed with the issuance of the building permit, and we look forward to establishing with the City the basis on Which they will be paid. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Very truly yours. ME/pkb Mark Engebretson 1 ^UNcii REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: JAl\J 2 y 1997 ^iTyOF ITEM NO; \ ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Resolution Terminating the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (Suburban Alliance) The City Council has been provided with information explaining the need to dissolve the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (Suburban Alliance) and has adopted a resolution indicating its intent to dissolve the organization (please see the attached materials). A resolution terminating the West Hennepin Human Services Planning (Suburban Alliance) is attached for Council adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the resolution terminating the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (Suburban Alliance). A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD (SUBURBAN ALLIANCE) WHEREAS, several cities in western Hennepin County entered into a joint powers agreement dated July 5, 1973 ("the Agreement") to create the West Hennepin Human Service Planning Board ("the Board"), also known as "Suburban Alliance," and WHEREAS, in subsequent years, additional cities in western Hennepin County also chose to participate in the Agreement: and WHEREAS, at the present time, the cities participating in the Agreement are the cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Hopkins, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medicine lake, Medina, Minnetonka, Minnctrisia, Mound, Orono, Plymouth, St. Bonifacius, Shorewood, St. Louis Park, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzaia and Woodland ("the Participating Cities"); and WHEREAS, the Board has operated since 1973 to provide human services planning and coordination for the western portion of Hennepin County; and ' WHEREAS, although the Board has provided valuable service to this area, these human serv'ice needs can now be better addressed ‘hrough other means, and the Board should be dissolved; and WHEREAS, representatives from the cities of Hopkins, Minnetonka, Plymouth, and St. Louis Park have formed a "Coordinating Committee" to oversee the Board's dissolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota: 1 The City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, joins with the other Participating Cities to terminate the Agreement and the existence of the Board. This termination will become effective when all Participating Cities have filed a resolution to the same ellect \\ ith the city manager of St. Louis Park. After the termination becomes effective, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota may act for all of the Participating Cities to take any necessary actions to effectuate the Board's 3. termination, including a final accounting, collection and payment of outstanding obligations, and distribution of funds. This delegation of authority is subject to the following conditions; the City of St. Louis Park must consult with other members of the Coordinating Committee before undertaking tasks which arc more than ministerial. The Cit> of St. Louis Park and the Coordinating Committee may not pay '*xpenses or incur obligations for the Board and the Participating Cities beyond the amount of $110,000, as outlined in the letter from the Coordinating Committee dated December 23,1996, unless additional e.xpenses or obligations are approved by the Participating Cities. In return for the services of the Coordinating Committee which are provided at no cost to the other Participating Cities, the City of Orono, Minnesota hereby waives any claims against the cities and individuals participating in the Coordinating Committee for any alleged negligence, gross negligence, misfeasance, or malfeasance in effectuating the dissolution of the Board. In no event, however, will the City of Orono be liable for any expenses beyond thosi outlined in the Committee's December 23, 1996 letter without the City's approval. 4.If the Board is not terminated by consent of all Participating Cities, then this resolution operates to terminate the City of Orono's participation in the Board effective January 31, 1998. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th dav of January, 1997. Gabriel Jabbour. Mavor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Deputy Clerk Joint Powers Cities Suburban AllianceAVest Hennepin Human Ser\'ices Planning Board December 23.1996 Ronald Moorsc City Administinfoi City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 'd ^ :L9S3 Dear Mr. Moorse, The dissolution of Suburban Alliance proceeds on schedule. The agency will cease operations on January 31, 1997. We have received 19 of 21 resolutions expressing the intent to dissolve from the member joint powers cities (we are currently missing resolutions from Medina and Mound). Discussions are underway about the future of human services planning and coordination in western Hennepin County. Many difficult issues have been resolved in the last months. The most significant is a settlement with the landlord, achieved with the assistance of the Suburban Alliance Board. The landlord released Suburban Alliance from the lease in consideration of a payment of $38,000. which represents the investment in leasehold improvements made to the property for Suburban Alliance. This settlement is good news, given that we anticipated a much higher obligation for the lease. Because of the resolution of the lease question and several other issues, we are now in a position to give you the amount of your city's obligation to close down the agency and pay the existing debts, fhe final amount is $110.000. Here is a breakdown of this number: 1995 Debts Emergency Service Providers $37,328 FEMA 4.734 Tw in Cities Voice Mail 7.545 Jobs Now Coalition 700 Subtotal 550,307 Final Lease Agreement $38,000 1996 Operating Delicit 6.500 Subtotal 594,807 Contingency 15.193 TOTAL 5110,000 The attached spreadsheet shows the obligation of each of ihc joint pow ers cities. Also included is an invoice for the amount owed by your city. r A few comments on the final calculation, in particular the contingency. The contingency number consists of $5,000 for legal fees, and over $10,000 to accommodate an anticipated revenue shortfall. The following provides more detail on these two items. • Legal Fees. One remaining outstanding issue is the final determination of the money owed to Suburban Alliance from Community Builders, a spin-off organization of Suburban Alliance. The amount owed is $40,000; however, it is unlikely that Community Builders can afford that amount. Suburban Alliance and Community Builders have not yet reached an agreement to resolve the debt. It may be necessary to initiate legal action to recover some or all of the amount owed, nence the legal fees number in the contingency. It also may be necessary to initiate legal action against some joint powers cities. When an agreement or legal settlement is reached and the money is received, joint powers cities will receive a partial refund. • Revenue Shortfalls. Several joint powers cities (Excelsior. Loretto, Long Lake, Minnestrista, Mound, and Tonka Bay) have not made their 1996 contribution to Suburban Alliance or only made a partial contribution. This is a major factor in the 1996 operating deficit of $6,500. In addition, several cities (Long Lake, Loretto, Minnestrista, and Mound) have indicated a hesitation to pay their share of the close­ out costs because of questions about membership status in Suburban Alliance. The contingency includes $10,000 in anticipation of not receiving funds from these cities. We continue to investigate the membership questions and the possible legal implications. If the contingency funds are not needed, the joint powers cities will receive a partial refund. To make certain that we are able to close the doors of .Suburban Alliance on ' January ’ 31, we ask that you remit a check to Suburban Alliance by January ’ 17, 1996. One final action will be necessary’, and that is for your city council to pass a resolution dissolving the joint powers agreement. After the first of the year, we will forward to you a draft resolution for your use. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during this long process. Should you have questions, please give any of us a call. Steve Mielke Hopkins 939-1326 Geralvn Barone Minnetonka 939-8200 Kathy Lueckert Plymouth 509-5052 Wally Wysopal St. Louis Park 924-2519 Sheet! Suburban Alliance Member Jurisdictions-Close-out Obligatioi^ " 12/17/96 City Name Deephaven Excelsior Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetrista Mound Orono Plymouth * Shorewood Spring Park St Lc'iis Park St, Bonifacius Tonka Bay Wayzato Woodland Total Population % of Total %of110K 3621 2367 16536 2952 1951 494' 2094 ■ ■ 373 3628 50569 3758 9592 7444 28696 6613 1757 43641 1192 1487 3860 482 193107 1.88 1.23' 8.56' i.53‘ lOT 0.26 1 .08' 0.19 1.88 26 19 1.95 4.97 3.85 14.86 3.42 091 22.60 0.62' c -•i 2.00 0.25_ 100 S S $ 2.062.64 1,348.32 9.419.47 $1,581.56 $ 1.rT36 $ 281.40 s' 1.192.81' $ ' 212.47 $ 2.066.'63 $ 28.805.81 $ 2,140.68 $ 5,463.93 S 4.240.35 $ 16.345.93 $ 3.766.99 S 1,000.85 $ 24,859.39 ■$ 679.00 S 847.05 $ 2.198.79 ■$ 274.'56 $110,000.00 * Plymouth also is served by Northwest Hennepin Human Services. The City contributes to both organizations based on 1/2 population. Page 1 f c West Hennepin Human Services Joint Powers Cities September 23, 1996 Mayor and City Council of Orono c/o Mr, Ronald Moorse, City Administrator P.O. Box 66 Cr>'stal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorse; SE? During the past weeks you have heard about the status of the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, also known as Suburban Alliance. Since July several of the city members of the joint powers agreement have worked to try to resolve the financial and fiinctional difficulties of Suburban Alliance. Unfortunately, it does not seem that Suburban Alliance can continue as an organization. At a September 5 meeting of the joint powers cities, a majority of the member cities (12 of 21 cities) reached consensus to recommend to the city councils to dissolve Suburban Alliance. Attached is a report on Suburban Alliance for your city council. The report spells out the legal and financial obligations of the joint powers cities. This report was reviewed with the Suburban Alliance Board of Directors on September 17, and they concur with the proposed plan. The report requests that your city council pass a resolution declaring intent to dissolve Suburban Alliance on January 31, 1997. \- We hope that you can sched’ action by your city council during October. Please forward a copy of the adop . ; ‘ * Kathy Lueckert, City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, PI} ‘ . j5447. The financial obligations of the joint powers cities to pay the Suburban Alliance debt and close out costs are not insignificant. We are working diligently to identify the bottom line and determine the actual obligation of each city. We will forward the number to you as soon as practicable. Thank you for your cooperation. Please give us a call if you have questions. Steve Mielke Hopkins 939-1326 Geralyn Barone Minneto.nka 939-8200 Kathy Lueckert Plymouth 509-5052 Wally Wysopal St. Louis Park 924-2519 MEMORANDUM West Hennepin Human Services Joint Powers Cities DATE:September 23, 1996 TO:Mayors and City Councils of West Hennepin Area FROM:On behalf of West Hennepin Human Services Joint Powers Cities: Steve Mielke (Hopkins City Manager), Geralyn Barone (Minnetonka Assistant City Manager), Kathy Lueckert (Plymouth Assistant City Manager) and Wally Wysopal (St. Louis Park Assistant City Manager) SUBJ Report on the Status of West Hennepin Human Services Board (also known as Suburban Alliance) and Request to Declare Intent to Dissolve Suburban Alliance as of January 31, 1997 ACTION REQUESTED: 1 he West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (also known as Suburban Alliance) is no longer a viable organization because of significant debt and inability j erfonn its core functions of human services planning and coordination. During the summer, staff from several of the Suburban Alliance joint powers cities and from Hennepin County have met with Suburban Alliance. Attempts to resolve the outstanding debt issues, keep the agency financially solvent, and provide core services have proven fruitless. The best option is to dissolve the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. We request that you receive the following report on the status of the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, review the action plan and approve a motion declaring intent to dissolve West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board as of January 31, 1997. BACKGROUND; The West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board was formed by a joint powers agreement in 1973. In recent years, the organization has employed the name Suburban Alliance. Its purpose was to “...provide an organization through which the parties may jointly and cooperatively coordinate the providing of human services, both publicly and privately, in the territory of the parties.” In addition to planning and coordinating human services, the board also provided a forum for citizen participation in human services. One impetus for forming not only the West Hennepin Board but also the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the South Hennepin Human Services Board is that some of the state and federal human services funding received by Hennepin County requires citizen input and participation. At the time the three boards were created, Hennepin County and the cities agreed that such planning and participation is best done at the local level. Joint Powers Cities Report on Suburban Alliance, Page 2 Eight cities were the original members of the Suburban Alliance board. Over time, the number of member cities has grown to twenty one, but an additional four cities receive services but provide no funding. Each member city can appoint two individuals to the Suburban Alliance Board. At their discretion, the board also can appoint various “at large” representatives. Because the size of the board (currently well over forty individuals) makes for unwieldy decision making, the board appoints an executive committee. This group effectively manages the organization. In its twenty three years of existence. Suburban Alliance has expanded its scope from the original functions of human services planning and coordination Suburban Alliance has managed the Energy Assistance Program (state funding), managed Emergency Services contracts for Hennepin County, and provided home energy audits for NSP. Its planning and coordination funding has been provided by the joint powers cities and by Hennepin County. It also spawned two other organizations. Community Builders works to provide housing options for low income residents of western IU«,.*epin County. The Suburban Hennepin Anti-Racism Coalition (SHARC) seeks to combat racism and encourage tolerance. Suburban Alliance has a tradition of human sen/ices advocacy and grass-roots citizen participation. Through the years Suburban Alliance and the joint powers cities have not had an active working relationsliip. DISCUSSION: Unbeknownst to the joint powers cities. Suburban Alliance ended 1995 with expenditures exceeding revenues. Nearly all of the debt was owed to ^ emergency services providers: Interfaith Outreach, Interchurch (ICA), VV'ECAN, and STEP. Money also is owed to Twin Cities Voice Mail. These organizations had provided services during 1995, but had not been reimbursed for these services by Suburban Alliance. Under the Hennepin County emergency services contract. Suburban Alliance was to approve the emergency services vouchers and to pay them with funding from the County. It appears that some of the emergency service dollars earmarked for the providers was used to pay other obligations of Suburban Alliance. The problem was compounded by inc'ci^e.i overhead expenses, due to an office relocation and rental market conditions &• U: • u^oe. During the spring, Hennepin County held discussions with Suburban Alliance about repaying the debt. In May, the Suburban Alliance Executive Director resigned. Suburban Alliance was unable to devise a repayment plan and to provide planning and coordination services which met the requirements of Hennepin County. In July, Hennepin County staff decided to recommend to the Hennepin County Board the termination of all contracts with Suburban Alliance, effectively shutting down the agency. Hennepin County staff then contacted the joint powers cities and informed them of this recommendation. In general, the call from Hennepin County was the first time the member cities were made aware of t \ Joint Powers Cities Report on Suburban Alliance, Page 3 the scope of the Suburban Alliance problem. The cities requested a one month delay in this recommendation, to see if a solution could be devised. City staff from Hopkins, Minnetonka, Plymouth and St. Louis Park have sought a solution during the last weeks. A workable solution to keep the agency open does not seem possible With great reluctance, a recommendation to close Suburban Alliance was made to all twenty one joint powers cities in early September. There seems to be consensus among the cities to close the agency’s doors by September 30, 1996 and to dissolve the joint powers agreement by January 31, 1997. The focus now has shifted to two issues: the orderly shut-down of Suburban Alliance, and the opening of discussions with Hennepin County about a new human services planning and coordination structure. The city attorneys ofMinnetonka and Plymouth/St. Louis Park have stated that legally the joint powers cities are responsible—jointly and severally—for the payment of the debt and costs associated with the agency shut down. The extent of the financial obligation will be discussed in the next section. The cities have devised an action plan to deal with all of the issues surrounding the shut down. This plan is attached. No deadlines are assigned to any of the action steps because the details are still under development. All member cities of the joint powers agreement must adopt a resolution dissolving the agency.. The joint powers agreement specifies that member cities have until August 1 of each year to declare their intent to leave the joint powers agreement at the end of the calendar year. If even one city does not take action to dissolve the agency, then Suburban Alliance will continue to exist until January 31,1998. This would not be a desirable situation. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The 1995 audit of Suburban Alliance, completed in 1996, pointed to some of the agency’s fiscal problems. While in 1996 Suburban Alliance appears to be operating within its budget, it is doing so w'ithout repaying 1995 debt and without having staff to perform core services. The primary reasons for the 1995 debt seem to be: • Suburban Alliance did not react promptly to cutbacks in federal and state funds, keeping staff employed without adequate funds for their salaries. Funding sources, such as emergency service dollars, were commingled in order to pay salaries. • Suburban Alliance, in 1994, was compelled to relocate from free space in St. Louis Park to leased space in Hopkins. The lease is for five years. Monthly rent is $3,000, and leasehold improvements were made which involve an additional $2,000 each quarter. Suburban Alliance has other outstanding obligations in addition to the debt owed to the emergency services providers. Listed below are estimates of these obligations: Joint Powers Cities Report on Suburban Alliance, Page 4 1995 Obligations Emergency Scivices Providers Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency Hennepin County Planning Contract TwinCities Voice Mail * Subtotal Deferred Revenues S 66,400 4,274 9,603 8.000 S 88,277 S 14,500 Total S1QJU7I2 Twin Cities Voice Mail provides a service to individuals who may not be able to afford telephone service but need a means to receive messages for job searches, etc. Attached is a spreadsheet summarizing Suburban Alliance’s projected revenue and expenditures for 1996. In addition, there are unknown 1996 obligations. Estimates of the total amount for which the joint powers cities are liable range from $100,000 to $177,000. A spreadsheet is attached which shows the potential obligation of each city, based on population. It assumes that the cost of debt repayment and close-out costs will be around $130,000. TWs number does not include any obligations for the remainder of the office space lease, which could be as much as an additional $130,000. We do not yet know how or when the city obligations will be paid, but our intent is to finalize the obligation number before December 31, 1996. The first priority will be debt repayment to the emergency service providers. Hennepin County has indicated its willingness to assist the cities with close out costs by continuing its planning and coordination funding for Suburban Alliance through the end of 1996. This funding will help reduce the overall obligation of each city. The current Suburban Alliance office manager will assist with the agency close-out through the end of the year. This individual will administer the emergency services contract for Hennepin County until the end of 1996. Hennepin County is exploring options available for emergency services for the first six months of 1997. It is likely that either the north or south human services planning boards will manage the emergency services contracts through June 1997. The joint powers cities feel strongly that an independent audit of the agency’s books is in order, both now and at the agency’s dissolution on December 31, 1996. The audit will determine the final financial obligation of each joint powers city. A CPA fanuliar with human services planning boards and non-profit organizations may be used to conduct these audits. Joint Powers Cities Report on Suburban Alliance, Page 5 FUTURE OF HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING: The staflf of the joint p^^ers cities and county staff feel strongly that there is a need for human services planning and coordination in western Hennepin County. During the fall, the cities will begin discussions with Hennepin County about creating a new entity to do human services planning and coordination. The goal is to h?*'e this new structure in place by July 1997. We have learned valuable lessons from this experience. It is likely that the new structure will have the active involvement of staff and/or elected officials from the member cities. Suburban Alliance provided a valuable service for over twenty years. However, the joint powers cities welcome this opportunity to look at what human service needs exist in the 1990s, and examine the best way to meet these needs well into the next century. RECOMMENDED ACTION: We recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which states the intent of the joint powers cities to dissolve the West Hennepin Human Services Board effective December 31, 1996. Another resolution, formally dissolving the organization, will be presented in December. Should you have questions, please gi/e any of us a call: Steve Mielke Geralyn Barone Kathy Lueckert Wally Wysopal Hopkins Minnetonka Plymouth St. Louis Park 939-1326 939-8200 509-5052 924-2519 Joint Powers Cities Report on Suburban Alliance, Page 6 City of Res. 96 - DECLARING EXTENT TO DISSOLVE RELATIONSHIP WITH WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD, A.K.A. SUBURBAN ALLIANCE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 31,1997 AND PROVIDING FOR ITS ORDERLY DISSOLUTION • WHEF’iCAS, the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, also known as Suburban Alliance, was established by joint powers agreement in 1973 to provide human services planning and coordination in western Hermepin County; and WHEREAS, Suburban Alliancif has provided valuable service to western Hennepin County, but due to financial difficulties is no longer able to perform its core functions of human service planriing and coordination; and WHEREAS, county and city staffs recommend the dissolution of Suburban Alliance effective January 31, 1997; and WHEREAS, county and city staffs recommend exploring new options for providing human services planning and coordination which can address current needs in western Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the joint powers cities recognize and accept their obligation to pay the debts and closing costs of Suburban Alliance; City of NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the _____that it declares its intent to dissolve its relationship with the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, also known as Suburban Alliance, effective January 31, 1997; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Staff are directed to discuss with Hennepin County and the other joint powers cities possible alternatives for human serv’ices planning and coordination in western Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council on I Suburban Alliance —^Proposed Action Steps Leeal ♦ Suburban Alliance Board of Directors continues to act as legal entity authorized to take actions necessary to close agency ♦ City Councils dissolve joint powers agreement and therefore the organization Financial ♦ Conduct independent preliminary review and audit of agency to determine exact financial status ♦ Close out existing contracts; finalize emergency service arrangements with Hennepin County for remainder of 1996 and first six months of 1997. ♦ Settle lease issues ♦ Collect debts owed organization ♦ Sell assets ♦ Finalize outstanding obligations (debt and close-out costs) and submit payment obligations to Joint powers cities by December 31, 1996. ♦ Conduct independent final audit of Suburban Alliance ♦ Collect outstanding financial obligations from Joint powers cities Logistical ♦ Establish agency close date of December 31, 1996. Office closes September 30,1996. ♦ Inventory physical assets/sell phycicd^ assets ♦ Provide information/assistance to employees ♦ Retain current office manager to assi'jt in coordination for agency close ' ♦ Begin discussions with Hennepin County about new human services planning and coordination structure for western Hennepin County Public Relations ♦ Western Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (a.k.a. Suburban Alliance) created in 1973 by cities in western Hennepin County to provide human services planning and coordination ♦ Suburban Alliance has pro vided valuable service to the citizens of western Hennepin County, but is no longer a viable organization ♦ Recommendation to close Suburban Alliance difficult for cities to make ♦ Cities and Hennepin County remain committed to human services planning and coordination; this is still an important need ♦ Exciting opportunity to work with Hennepin County to develop human services planning and coordination which meets today’s needs in western Hennepin County West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board Summary of Projected Revenues & Expenditures (4/96) 12 Month Period Ending December 1996 Energy Citizen Home Assistance Participation Emergency Energy Revenues;Program & Coordination Services Audits Other Total Dept of Economic Security $1,022,500 * •$1,022,500 Hennepin County . 82,9d0>116,600^.• .199,500 Member Municipaiit'es 35,000 35,000 NSP Audit Program 76,300 76,300 Rent/Fiscal Agency 39,900 39,900 Total Revenues $1,022,500 $117,900 $116,600 $76,300 $39,900 $1,373,200 E:<penditures: Direct Assistance $775,600 $104,800 $14,000 $894,400 Personnel Related 130,200 57,700 10,200 21,200 18,600 237,900 Non Personnel Related 116,700 60,200 1,600 17,100 21,300 216,900 Total Expenditures $1,022,600 $117,900 $116,600 $52,300 $39,900 $1,349,200 Revenues >. Less Expenditures $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $0 $24,000 Board Meeting July 16.1996 9 Sheetl Suburban Alliance Joint Powers Cities-Debt and Close-out Obligations City Name Population % of Total1 %of 130K Deephaven 3,621 1.88 $ 2,437.67 Excelsior 2,367 1.23 $ 1.593.47 Hopkins 16,536 8.56 S 11,132.10 Independence 2,952 1.53 $ 1,987.30 Long Lake 1,951 1.01 $ 1,313.42 Loretto 494 0.26 $ 332.56 Maple Plain 2,094 1.08 $ 1,409.69 Medicine Lake 373 0.19 S 251.10 . Medina 3,628 1.88 S 2,442.38 Minnetonka 50,569 26.19 $ 34.043.24 Minnetrista 3,758 1.95 S 2,529.90 Mound 9,592 4.97 $ 6,457.37 Orono 7,444 3.85 $ 5,011.33 Plymouth *28,696 14.86 S 19,317.92 Shorewood 6,613 3.42 S 4,451.90 Spring Park 1,757 0.91 $ 1,182.82 St. Louis Park 43,641 22.60 $ 29,379.28 St. Bonifacius 1,192 0.62 $ 802.46 Tonka Bay 1,487 0.77 $ 1,001.05 Wayzata 3,860 2.00 $ 2,598.57 Woodland 482 0.25 $ 324.48 • Total 193,107 100 $ 130,000.00 Plymouth’s population is split between Suburban Alliance and Northwest Hennepin Human Service Council. The City contributes to both organizations. Page 10 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUA/c/L DATE: ITEM NO.: fVcEono*., Department Approvalry^J)Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: John Olson City Administrator's Title: Mgmt. Analys^cct.Report Item Description: Bid Awards 1997 Public Services Department Truck Replacements Attachments:A. Letter of intent dated October 16, 1996 B. Memodated January 23, 1997 The Public Services Department budgeted for 3 trucks in the 1997 budget. 1. A replacement single>axle dump truck under the State of Minnesota contract 2. A replacement 3/4 ton pickup under the Hennepin County contract 3. A replacement 1/2 ton pickup under the Hennepin County contract Vehicle description 1. 1997 Ford Model L 8000 conventional Ford single a.xle dump truck Purchase amt.Budget amt. $65,972 $64,900 $23,525 $25,600 $18,263 $19,000 $107,760 $109,500 2. 1997 Chevrolet 3/4 ton 4 wheel drive pickup with snow plow & related hydraulics 3. 1997 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 4 wheel drive pickup used by building/zoning inspectors Totals The purchase for these three vehicles is $1,740 under budget. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council authorize the purchase of a 1997 Ford L 8000 single axle dump truck, from Boyer Ford, under the State of Minnesota contract (#30415363), in the amount of $65,972; purchase a 1997 Chevrolet 3/4 ton 4 wheel drive pickup with snow plow and related hydraulics, from Grossman Chevrolet, under Hennepin County contract (#3925B6-232), in the amount of $23,525; and purchase a 1997 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 4 wheel drive pickup, from Grossman Chevrolet, under Hennepin County contract (#3925B6-232), in the amount of $18,263. , seconded by Ao PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by_______________ purchase a single axle dump truck under the State of Minnesota contract for an amount not to exceed $65,972, a 3/4 ton pickup/snow plow under the Hennepin County contract for an amount not to exceed $23,525, and a 1/2 ton pickup under the Hennepin County contract for an amount not to exceed $18,263. Funds expended from the Improvement & Equipment Outlay Fund. Ayes___, Nays___. ClTY<rf OB0NO Municipal Ofllces Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Mr. Bruce Rioux Boyer Ford Trucks Inc. Government Sales Division 2811 NE Broadway St. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Dear Bruce: This letter will serve as our intent to purchase one 1997 Model L 8000 conventional Ford single axle cab and chassis, Vin# 1FDYK82E7VVAZ4063 as awarded by the state bid. The cost of the vehicle cab and chassis, dump body, hydraulics, under body plow, special paint and other options as listed on J-Craft Quotation of October 10,1996 shall not exceed $65,972 including sales tax. A purchase order will be issued after January 1,1997 conditioned upon Council approval. If you have any questions, please call me at 473-7357. Sincerely, Public Works Director JRG/ch Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 January 23, 1997 To: From: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John Olson, Mgmt. Analyst/Acct. Subject: Purchase of Vehicles for Public Services Department. The 1997 budget includes three vehicles for the Public Services Department. 1. A replacement single axle dump truck. This vehicle is used in snow removal and ice control operations, as well as for other general and street maintenance operations. 2. A replacement 3/4 ton pickup with snow plow and related hydraulics. This vehicle is used in snow removal and ice control operations, and is particularly useful in areas not accessible by larger vehicles. The vehicle is also used for street, utility, and general maintenance operations. 3. A replacement 1/2 ton pickup. This vehicle is used by building and zoning inspectors. A breakdown of the costs for each vehicle is as follows: 1. 1997 Ford L 8000 Single Axle Dump Truck: Cab/Chassis $46,850 Box and Hydraulics 8,500 Under body plow 4,000 Hitches, and Controls 1,346 Rust Proofing 250 Paint and identification markers 1.000 Subtotal $61,946 Sales tax 4.026 Total $65,972 Budgeted: $64,900 Boyer Ford, under the State of Minnesota Contract (#30415363), was awarded this bid. 2. 1997 Chevrolet 3/4 Ton 4-wheel drive pickup with snow plow and related hydraulics. Base amount Plow and hydraulics Heavy-duty towing package Air conditioning Subtotal Sales tax Total $18,768 2,525 135 661 22,089 1.436 $23,525 Budgeted: $25,600 Grossman Chevrolet, under Hennepin County Contract (#3925B6-232), was awarded this bid. riJirinfftriTTiTN Mfn 1 iTir* RTiiTO iTilRI '.k'fifil rti DP.WiTi PTiTt Bm i ri^.u r»i r«HTiiTF •K«0 |tir«T«l rtiiTini r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Jan 2 7 C/TVop, 1997 Date: January 23, 1997 Item No Department Approval: Name: Gary Cheswick Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Title:Chief of Police Item Description: POLICE DEPARTMENT DONATION Exhibits:Attached Letter DISCUSSION On January 11. 1997, Officer Dan Fischenich attended a meeting of the French Creek Homeowners Association, discussing crime prevention techniques and answering questions from those attending. This neighborhood meeting was the second time the police department had been invited and was very well received. After the first meeting, the Association donated money to the police department for purchase of needed equipment. Again, the French Creek Homeowners Association would like to donate money (approx. $600) for the same purpose. I request permission to accept this donation to put into an account to enable the department to address equipment needs that are beyond what can be funded through the annual operating budget. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approval to accept donation from French Creek Homeowners Association. \ ■'j.- t! BRADLEY M. JONES 2Z55 FRENCH CREEK CIRCLE □ ROND, M'NNESOTA 55391-9399 (6 1 2) A76-C9 1 9 (612) 347-9196 January 17,1997 Chief Gary Cheswick Orono Police Department City of Orono 2710 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 Re: French Creek Owners ’ Association Dear Chief Cheswick: This follows our telephone conversation of January 14. I enclose a copy of a letter I sent to Officer Fischenich. All of us truly enjoyed listening to his comments. To show our appreciation, I mentioned that we would like to make a donation for the benefit of the Police Department. I look forward to hearing from you regarding the proper procedure to follow. If there is anything else that we can do to show support for law enforcement in this community, please do not hesitate to call. truly yours, Bradley M(J/ne BMJ:DP\437971 cc: French Creek Owners ’ Association Enclosure % «■«)! REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 'A/q DATE: January 10, ITEM NO;' ;ih Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed: / Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT SPRING HOME PREVIEW John Thomas - Custom Homes 2425 Old Beach Road March 8 through March 23, 1997 RESIDENTIAL KENNEL -Wayne E & Gayle D Carrier 1376 North Arm Drive CIGARETTE LICENSES John O'Sullivan Culvers 3340 Shoreline Drive John O’Sullivan O'Sullivan ’s 2240 Shadywood Road Leroy Koehnen Navarre Amoco 3360 Shoreline Drive Steven Corl Navarre Liquors, Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive Bill Wear Orono Self Service 2160 Wayzata Blvd. Jimmie Holtz Jimmie’s Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Richard Kohn Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Blvd. Richard Bloomquist Rick’s Super Valu 3333 Shoreline Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve/deny above listed licenses. - ----------............ CITY OF ORONO W 6124730510 12/23/96 14:11 g:02/03 NO:608 PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPUCATION Ci CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit Fee; $60.00 . . Date wY/Tf Phone Number; Name:_v Ol-l(Vi HVI oHA^ C\ih>^C:\A Addreaat'lM^S {2/b'^ ^n~- lO'Z' City, State, Zip: At^lC \/AtL€^ Location of Parade or Event; Dl-D l^cACH OoA/)C^P^C^C) Date of Event;‘3,-^-^)7 Hour* of Event; vV\ - P f i 6UiJ i I** Type of Event: ^ P/cl NO) P>Z.fc\JiS/\/ Insurance Company: P)C^O —• Amoun^j. /)0r. (Copy of insuranco cartHhato must ba aubmittad wfth this application) \ I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and wilt abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. I understa ome events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a ired for these services. Date pproved: Q Denied: Q By:, Remarks: 0i0.1f# 1 Date:January 6, 1997 To:Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:Special Event Permit - Spring Home Preview 2425 Old Beach Road, Orono For the above mentioned permit, please include the following restrictions: Roadway passage must remain open for all traffic. If traffic enforcement becomes necessary, applicant must furnish traffic control for the Preview to continue. If roadway becomes narrow due to excessive snow, one side of roadway must be posted "No Parking". 1 1 KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 19^7 to December 31, 19XZ Owner:G. /iAVLeX>__ Property Address: /^"7rg y—S-^ 3^ ^ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):______________ Phone: (home) “^7/ - o (work) ^£Tifi e-p ^/a RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:. (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: 7^oe>r?uS- __mnc.LlA^A Ar>St>s /f}/^ Purpose for more than 2 does: M/e' Dogs normally kept: inside____kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:___________________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applican Date // /^ 7 / / For City Use Only Kennel inspected by A' C‘S' Sv'lto 7"^Date '/f7 Recommends Approval Denial [ i CITY of OBONO Post ornce Box 66*Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMINISTRATION - 473-735« FAX-473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address IVJ-O-'VI.S Bdx 6 s' City/State/Zip Code AI/Ll/6lj. Kj> ^ Phone Number ^ ( - Q ~7 k/0 2. Sales Location: Name Street Address Mailing Address ^0/>T (o\ , ///^ Phone Number 3. Principal business carried on at this location 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMINISTRATION -473-735S FAX-473-0310 (JAN 1.7 1997 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 Mailing Address '^O City/State/Zip Code K\Jid Uiri Phone Number ^ 7cP Sales Location: Name /)/Jd • Street Address 3 ?S /-fcP Mailing Address /l/y?5T^3 ^ Phone Number ^ 7/ ~~ CP ^jL Principal business carried on at this location s ^ niTiCU' 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO Signature of applicant Dated ^Z<=-7 ~) CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay» Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka administration -473-'bJ|J\\^ FAX-47M510 ' APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address [TUwuK^irfc. City/State/Zip Code Phone Number ni47i 2. Sales Location: Name _ _ _ _ _ _ Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July LICENSE FEES Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. 3 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMINISTRATION -473-7358 FAX-4734)510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant Bill WfAg_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 19 37 Mailing Address P.O.Box 2/40 VI»VIa^?ATA SlVD City/State/Zip Code LqM6> La K^ Mfi 55356e>________ Phone Number 6lZ 413 7047 2. Sales Location: Name O ro Wq Sal-^ S(ur>f\<LC Street Address 2iu0 U “Byvfj Mailing Address RD.B qX 3QCj Llkf Mrt 5S3SL 6>IZ 4n?^-TdA7 _______________________Phone Number 3. Principal business carried on at this location onvisitte. 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr ^_ May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan1/^ LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan, 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO Signature of applicant Dated CITY of ORONO Post Office Bok 66»C t:^sUI Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake MUmstonka ADMINISTRATION - 47M358 CC« ( FAX-473-05)C' 2. 4. r- rt APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Ocono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant j^//r'7 /^ ________ Mailing Address ^ 'TbUil , 19^7 City/State/Zip Code , MfJ. Phone Number _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. Sales Location: Name X• Street Address tyQ Mailing Address A/AV'AtZjd.l^ , /i'J/i). Phone Number V^7 / " (c> Cc-> 3, Principal business carried on at this location Aj Method of Sales: Over Counter Other /^yfer/y^c^_ I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: iX Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct LICENSE FEES Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to; CITY OF ORONO CITYofORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 56323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMINISTRATION - 473-735S FAX-47WW10 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 19 97 Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant tuA-ji- CouAjr/C^ CLU^ Mailing Address ^00 Uj. UJA^zf\-rA City/State/Zip Code Phone Number l4n 2. Sales Location: Name Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number 3. Principal business carried on at this location f.ou*^rtc^ CLuJ 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter y other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr LICENSE FEES May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan, 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to; CITY OP ORONO Signature of applicant Dated /-/A^ CITYofORONO Post Office Box 66*Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka FAX-47M510 I APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 19 Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 fUZ Name of Applicant k_i L'O • \ k Mailing Address 3^33 t-<=» (i ^-p 0/1. City/State/Zip Code \\AOf^Y<r-p /?}/\) Phone Number -im -6^73 Sales Location: Name i Street Address -^3*33 e p/, Mailing Address ^79-AT)‘f‘ Phone Number Principal business carried on at this location Method of Sales: Over Counter other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: \ Feb-Mar-Apr Y May-June-July _ Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES I Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CIW^F^,ORO Signature of applicant Dated / - - W zy ®0(//V( 'Ian 2 j. Cny, i9sr i7 .1 L 14 Jan 1997 Tue 8:21 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53022 53022 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 15-Jan-97 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 53022 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 53023 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 53023 53023 53023 15-Jan-97 15-Jan-97 15-Jan-97 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 53023 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 53024 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 53024 15-Jan-97 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Totals Check Number 53024 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Check Number 53025 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT & COLL 53025 15-Jan-97 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT 6 COLL Totals Check Number 53025 HENNEPIN CO. SUPPORT & COLL Check Number 53026 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL 53026 15-Jan-97 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL Totals Check Number 53026 HEr^l^TPIN COUNTY SUPPORT k COLL Check Number 53027 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 53027 15-Jan-97 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 53027 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Humber 53028 LAW ENFORCKENT LABOR SERVICE 53028 15-Jan-97 LAW ENFORCMENT lASOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 53028 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Oieck Number 53029 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 53029 15-Jan-97 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 53029 KN DEPT OF RE'/ENUE Check Number 53030 MN MUTUAL LIFE 53030 15-Jan-97 MN MinUAL LIFE Totals Check Number 53030 MN MUTUAL LIFE Transaction Amount 6.780.00 6.780.00 3,342.18 3,342.18 8,058.45 14,742.81 791.46 791.46 164.82 164.82 184.50 184.50 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 3,379.87 3,379.87 55.00 55.00 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED FICA k MEDICARE W/H FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H THOMTON 8C0266780 SKREEN 8C0262310 DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES W/H STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H I -- k. 14 Jan 1997 Tue 8:21 AM Check Number Check Number 53031 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 53031 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 15-Jan-97 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 53031 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Transaction Amount 150.00 150.00 Page 2 Comments DEFERRED COMP W/H Check Number 53032 53032 PEBSCO/OBRA 15-Jan-97 Totals Check Number PEBSCO/OBRA 53032 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 53033 53033 PE6SC0/US CONF OP MAYORS 15-Jan-97 Totals Check Number PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 53033 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 37.76 37.76 1,956.82 1,956.82 OBRA DEFERRED COMP H/H USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H Check Number 53034 PERA 53034 53034 15-Jan-97 l5-Jan-97 Totals Check Number PERA PERA 53034 PERA 4,132.29 5,388.31 9,520.60 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE Check Number 53035 UNITED HAY 53035 15-Jan-97 Totals Check Number UNITED WAY 53035 UNITED WAY 23.00 23.00 CHARITY DONATIONS W/H Grand Total 37.686.64 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:03 PM Check Register City of Orono Page i Check Number Date Name Check Number 53036 53036 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO INC. 31-Dec-96 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO INC, Totals Check Number 53036 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO INC. Check Number 53037 AT & T - 53037 31-Dec-96 AT & T - Totals Check Number 53037 AT a T - Check Number 53038 BONESTROO ROSENE & ASSOC. Check Number 53039 53039 CITY OF WAYZATA 00-Feb-96 CITY OF WAYZATA Totals Check Number 53039 CITY OF WAYZATA Check Number 53040 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 53040 31-Dec-96 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Totals Check Number 53040 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Check Number 53041 FEED RITE CONTROLS 53041 31-Dec-96 FEED RITE CONTROLS Totals Check Number 53041 FEED RITE CONTROLS Check Number 53042 GERRING'S CAR WASH 53042 31-Dec-96 GERRING'S CAR WASH Totals Check Number 53042 GERRING'S CAR WASH Check Number 53043 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Transaction Amount Comments 4.175.40 4.175.40 CMP 5.33 5.33 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSLI«-&ASSOC.2.698.59 L.L. CC SAN SHR-NOV 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.5.354.83 N. L.L. SANITY SMR-NOV 53038 31-Dec-96 BO.NESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.169.70 I & I NAVARRB-CASCO PT 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.684.75 I & I. SAGA HILLS/FOREST L 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.469.45 KELLEY AVE SHR-NOV 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.118.85 BROWN RD/WTRTOWN RD INSP 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.1.121.15 L.S. #28 RENOVATION 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.149.15 OCB RD TRAIL INSP-NOV 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.201.00 OCB RD BRIDGE-NOV 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.3,619.20 NOV SERVICES 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.4,612.34 L.L. CC SAN SWR-OCT 53038 31-Dec-96 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.4,685.81 N. L.L. SANITY SWR Totals Check Number 53038 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.23,864.82 3.170.78 3.170.78 4TH QTR WTR CONSUMPTION % 510.00 510.00 4TH OTR CONNECTION OIGS 20.00 20.00 CONTAINER CHARGE 2.09 2.09 REMAINING BALANCE ♦ 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:03 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53043 53043 53043 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 31-Dec-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 31-Dec-96 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Totals Check Number 53043 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Check Number 53044 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 53044 31-Dec-96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS Totals Check Number 53044 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Check Number 53045 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL 53045 31-Dec-96 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL Totals Check Number 53045 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL Check Number 53046 J.S. STEHART COMPANIES INC. 53046 31-Dec-96 J.S. STEWART COMPANIES INC. Totals Check Number 53046 J.S. STEWART COMPANIES INC. Check Number 53047 KUEHN, THOMAS 53047 08-Feb-96 KUEHN, THOMAS Totals Check Number 53047 KUEHN, THOMAS Qieck Number 53048 LOGIS 53048 31-Dec-96 LOGIS Totals Check Number 53048 LOGIS Check Number 53049 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 53049 31-Dec-96 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Totals Check Number 53049 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Check Number 53050 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 53050 31-Dec-96 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Totals Check Number 53050 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 53051 MN STATE TREASURER 53051 31-Dec-96 MN STATE TREASURER Totals Check Number 53051 MN STATE TREASURER Transaction Amount 6.13 6.12 12.25 78.75 78.75 348.52 348.52 750.00 750.00 13.74 13.74 2.509.56 2.509.56 15.00 15.00 10,692.00 10,692.00 3,452.36 3,452.36 Page 2 Comments DECEMBER SERVICE DECEMBER SERVICE MAILI1K3 LISTS SVC POLICE GENERATOR REPAIR SEWER STUB DECEMBER '95 MILEAGE DECEMBER DATA PROCESSING DRUG TESTING DECEMBER SAC CHARGES 4TH QTR BLDG PERMIT SURCH fr**Ta*i 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:03 PM Check Number Date Check Register City of Orono Name Transaction Amount Page 3 Comments Check Number 53052 53052 NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL 31-Dec-96 NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL Totals Check Number 53052 NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL 2«000.00 2,000.00 SAGA HILL SITE ASSMNT Check Number 53053 53053 OMAN, LYLE 31-Dec-96 Totals Check Number OMAN, LYLE 53053 OMAN, LYLE Check Number 53054 53054 SEW LIKE NEW 31-Dec-96 Totals Check Number SEW LIKE NEW 53054 SEW LIKE NEW 24.60 24.60 7.26 7.26 MILEAGE RQ4AINING BALANCE Check Number 53055 53055 TOWN & COUNTRY 31-Dec-96 Totals Check Number TOWN & COUNTRY 53055 TOWN k COUNTRY Check Number 53056 53056 53056 53056 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 Totals Check Number UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 53056 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 963.83 963.83 233.95 56.70 83.90 374.55 DECEMBER SERVICE CHESWICK-JACKET SHIRTS SHIRT-FARNIOK Check Number 53057 53057 UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC 31-Dec-96 Totals Check Number UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC 53057 UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC 4,050.00 4,050.00 DATA CONVERSION Check Number 53058 53058 WEST PHOTO 07-Jan-97 Totals Check Number WEST PHOTO 53058 WEST PHOTO 52.46 52.46 FILM Check Number 53059 53059 53059 53059 WIDMER INC 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 WIDMER INC WIDMER INC WIDMER INC Totals Check Number 53059 WIDMER INC 1.092.00 1.859.00 1.502.50 4.453.50 SWR MAIN BREAK HTR MAIN BREAK SWR MAIN BREAK Grand Total 61,566.80 23 Jan 19?7 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number 53065 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Check Number 53066 BORIS, SCOTT 53066 23-Jan*97 BORIS. SCOTT Totals Check Number 53066 BORIS, SCOTT Check Number 53067 BUDGET PRINTING 53067 53067 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING Totals Check Number 53067 BUDGET PRINTING 34.26 34.26 5.75 133.02 138.77 Page 1 Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 53060 A.T.O.M. 53060 08-Jan-96 A.T.O.M. 75.00 ENGLISH-MANAGING THE 1 53060 23-Jan-97 A.T.O.M.320.00 ANDERSON-SEMINAR Totals Check Number 53060 A.T.O.M.395.00 Check Number 53061 ALBERS JEWELRY 53061 23-Jan-97 ALBERS JEWELRY 15.75 PLAQUES Totals Check Number 53061 ALBERS JEWELRY 15.75 Check Number 53062 APACHE PAPER CO 53062 23-Jan-97 APACHE PAPER CO 47.38 C-FOLD TOWELS,TISSUE 53062 23-Jan-97 APACHE PAPER CO 94.75 C-FOLD TOWELS,TISSUE 53062 23-Jan-97 APACHE PAPER CC 94.75 C-FOLD TOWELS,TISSUE 53062 23-Jan-97 APACHE PAPER CO 710.54 C-FOLD TOWELS,TISSUE Totals Check Number 53062 APACHE PAPER CO 947.42 Check Number 53063 ASLET 53063 23-Jan-97 ASLET 50.00 TQMaiECK-SEMINAR Totals Check Number 53063 ASLET 50.00 Check Number 53064 ASPLUNDH <COFFEE 53064 31-Dec-96 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 202.00 COFFEE Totals Check Number 53064 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 202.00 % 53065 23-Jan-97 AT 6 T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.45 JANUARY SERVICE 53065 23-Jan-97 AT 6 T WIRELESS SERVICES 5.44 JANUARY SERVICE 53065 23-Jan-97 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 80.22 JANUARY SERVICE Totals Check Number 53065 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 91.11 SUPPLIES REIMB. MAIL BUDGETS TO GFOA PLAQUES I4 i L. 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53068 53068 CARGILL SALT DIVISION 31-Dec-96 CARGILL SALT DIVISION Totals Check Number 53068 CARGILL SALT DIVISION Check Number 53069 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO 53069 53069 53069 53069 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 31-Dec-96 CHUNKS LAXESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAXESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAXESHORE AUTO CHUNKS LAXESHORE AUTO Totals Check Number 53069 CHUNKS LAXESHORE AUTO Check Number 53070 53070 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE 23-Jan-97 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE Totals Check Number 53070 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE Check Number 53071 CITY OF ST. PAUL 53071 23-Jan-97 CITY OF ST. PAUL Totals Check Number 53071 CITY OF ST. PAUL Check Number 53072 COLE PUBLICATIONS 53072 31-Dec-96 COLE PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 53072 COLE PUBLICATIONS Check Number 53073 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 53073 23-Jan-97 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO Totals Check Number 53073 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO Check Number 53074 CROWN MARKING INC. 53074 31-Dec-96 CROWN MARKING INC, Totals Check Number 53074 CROWN MARKING INC Check Number 53075 DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MGMT 53075 23-Jan-97 DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MGMT Totals Check Number 53075 DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MGMT Check Number 53076 53076 E-Z RECYCLING 05-Feb-96 E-Z RECYCLING Totals Check Number 53076 E-Z RECYCLING Transaction Amount 3,118.91 3,118.91 17.10 231.75 162.95 1,757.09 2,168.89 795.00 795.00 200.00 200.00 234.47 234.47 933.08 933.00 21.31 21.31 75.00 75.00 5,422.92 5,422.92 Page 2 Comments ROAD SALT 0174 REPAIR POOR GROUND 0170 TUNE UP 0171 REPLACE PITMAN ARM 0175 TPATJSMISSION FIREARMS TRAINING FARNIOK-STREET SAFE OFFCR 1997 DIRECTORY JANUARY INSURANCE VAN ZOMEREN DESK SIGN OIESWZCK-RECISTRATION JANUARY SERVICES r i 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Number Date Check Number 53077 FIRSTAR 53077 23-Jan-97 53077 23-Jan-97 53077 23-Jan-97 53077 23-Jan-97 53077 23-Jan-97 Check Register City of Orono Totals Check Number Name FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 53077 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY Qieck Number 53078 53078 53078 53078 53078 FISCHER AGGREGATES INC. 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 FISCHER AGGREGATES INC. FISCHER AGGREGATES INC FISCHER AGGREGATES INC, FISCHER AGGREGATES INC Totals Check Number 53078 FISCHER AGGREGATES INC, Check Number 53079 ford construction 53079 23-Jan-97 FORD CONSTRUCTION Totals Check Number 53079 FORD CONSTRUCTION Check Number 53080 HEALTHPARTNERS 53080 53080 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 HEALT!i?ARTNERS HEALTHPARTNERS Totals Check Number 53080 HEALTOPARTNERS Check Number 53091 HILE, DOUG 53081 23-Jan-97 HILE, DOUG Totals Check Number 53081 HILE. DOUG Check Number 53082 ICMA 53082 31-Dec-96 ICMA Totals Check Number 530B2 ICMA Check Number 53083 INT'L CONF. OF BLDG OFFICIALS 53083 23-Jan-97 INT'L CONF. OF BLDG OFFICIALS Totals Check Number 53083 INT'L CONF. OF BLDG OFFICIALS Check Number 53084 intoximeters 53084 23-Jan-97 INTOXIMETERS Totals Check Number 53084 INTOXIhSTTERS Transaction Amount 289,814.42 136.550.50 139.810.50 67,210.25 147.887.50 781,273.17 666.09 2,183.81 1,135.30 1,367.42 5,352.62 8,775.51 8,775.51 313.51 5,477.08 5,790.59 6,970.00 6,970.00 356.00 356.00 85.00 85.00 355.71 355.71 Page 3 Comments DEBT DUE 1-15-97 DEBT DUE 2-1-97 DEBT DUB 2-1-97 DEBT DUB 2-1-97 DEBT DUE 2-1-97 ROAD SAND ROAD SAND ROAD SAND ROAD SAND PAY #3 L.S. 828 JANUARY INSURANCE JANUARY INSURANCE EASEMENT 1997 SUBSCRIPTION 1997 DUES BREATH ANALYZER 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53085 53085 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY 23-Jan-97 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY Totals Check Number 53085 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY Check Number 53086 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY 53006 23-Jan-97 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Totals Check Number 53086 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Check Number 53087 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 53087 53087 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Totals Check Number 53087 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Check Number . ud8 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 53088 53088 31-Dec-96 31-Dec-96 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 53080 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 53009 MEDICA CHOICE Check Number 53090 MET COUNCIL ENVIRCNMEirrAL :,VC5 53090 53090 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT A!. SVCS MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Totals Check Number 53090 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 53091 MICRO AGE 53091 23-Jan-97 MICRO AGE Totals Check Number 53091 MICRO AGE Check Number 53092 MILE 53092 23-Jan-97 MILE Totals Check Number 53092 MILE Check Number 53093 MINNEAPOLIS SPOKESMAN 23-Jan-97 MINNEAPOLIS SPOIOISMAN53093 Transaction Amount 347.00 347.00 20.320.00 75.00 20.395.00 13.057.07 13.057.07 195.00 195.00 16.86 Page 4 Comments #175 REPAIR DOOR 20.14 PLANNER 20.14 1.49 FUSE 3.09 4.58 WIPERS • 7.35 RING, WASHER - BACKHOE 69.72 77.07 BULB. FLASH -BACKHOE 53089 23-Jan-97 MEDICA CHOICE 262.03 FEBRUARY INSURANCE 53089 23-Jan-97 MEDICA CHOICE 112.29 FEBRUARY INSURANCE 53089 2?-Jan-97 MEDICA CHOICE 11.946.39 FEBRUARY INSURANCE Totals Check Number 53089 MEDICA CHOICu 12.320.71 FEBRUARY SERVICE 1997 DISCHARGE PERMIT COMPUTERS. MONITOR MCNICHOLS-DRUNK DRIVING AD FOR POSITION J 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53093 MINNEAPOLIS SPOKESMAN Totals Check Number 53093 MINNEAPOLIS SPOKESMAN Check Number 53094 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC. 53094 23-Jan-97 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC Totals Check Number 53094 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC, Check Number 53095 MN ASHRAE CHAPTER 53095 23-Jan-97 MN ASHRAE CHAPTER Totals Check Number 53095 MN ASHRAE CHAPTER Check Number 53096 MN CHIEFS OF POL. ED. FOUNDATI 53096 23-Jan-97 MN CHIEFS OF POL. ED. FOUNDATI Totals Check Number 53096 MN CHIEFS OF POL. ED. FOUNDATI Check Number 53097 MN DEPT OP AGRICULTURE 53097 23-Jan-97 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Totals Check Number 53097 MN DEPT OP AGRICULTURE Check Number 53096 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 53098 23-Jan-97 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Totals Check Number 53090 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Number 53099 MN ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT 53099 23-Jan-97 MN ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT Totals Check Number 53099 MN ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT Check Number 53100 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM 53100 23-Jan-97 MOROWCZYNSKI« JIM Totals Check Number 53100 MOROWCZYNSKI. JIM Check Number 53101 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 53101 23-Jan-97 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Totals Check Number 53101 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE Check Number 53102 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 53102 23-Jan-97 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Transaction Amount 16.86 35.00 35.00 45.00 45.00 215.00 215.00 10.00 10.00 425.00 425.00 35.00 35.00 259.70 259.70 265.00 285.00 8.00 Page 5 Comments 1997 DUES VANG-MN ASHRAE CHAPTER CHESWICK-REGISTRATION APPLICATOR LICENSE DEBAQIE-SEMINAR 1997 DUES JACKET. PANTS REIMB. TOMCHECK-RIALISTIC SUSPEC REMAINING BALANCE i 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53102 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Totals Check Number 53102 NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER Check Number 53103 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE 53103 23-Jan-97 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Totals Check Number 53103 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Check Number 53104 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 53104 31-Dec-96 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Totals Check Number 53104 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR Check Number 53105 OFFICE DEPOT 53105 23-Jan-97 OFFICE DEPOT Totals Check Number 53105 OFFICE DEPOT Check Number 53106 OMAN, LYLE 53106 23-Jan-97 OMAN. LYLE Totals Check Number 53106 OMAN, LYLE Check Number 53107 PIONEER 53107 53107 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 53107 PIONEER Check Number 53108 POSTMASTER 53106 31-Dec-96 POSTMASTER Totals Check Number 53108 POSTMASTER Check Number 53109 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST 53109 23-Jan-97 PRO TIRE i EXHAUST Totals Check Number 53109 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST Check Number 53110 R.L. YOUNGDAilL & ASSOC £3110 23-Jan-97 R.L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOC Totals Check Number 53110 R.L. YOUNGDAHL fc ASSCC, Check Number 53111 RADISSON SUITES Transaction Amount 8.00 2.730.00 2.730.00 17.30 17.30 138.50 138.50 16.61 16.61 42.18 132.55 174.73 24.00 24.00 37.86 37.86 1.350.00 1.350.00 Comments 1997 TRAINING OIL CHANGE MISC SUPPLIES TRAINING REIMS AD FOR BIDS N. L.L. SHR AD P.O. BOX RENTAL Page 6 #176 OIL CHANGE, CK BRAKE 1997 INSURANCE ^ ip pr 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53111 53111 RADISSON SUITES 23-Jan-97 RADISSON SUITES Totals Check Number 53111 RADISSON SUITES Check Number 53112 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES 53112 18-Jan-96 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Totals Check Number 53112 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES Check Number 53113 SCHARBER & SONS 53113 31-Dec-96 SCHARBER k SONS Totals Check Number 53113 SCHARBER & SONS Qieck NUmb^53114 SCHWABB INC. 53m c r 23-Jan-97 23-Jan-97 SCKHABB INC. SCHNABB INC. Totals Chr^-^ ^n\ber 53114 SCHWABB INC. Check Number 53115 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 53115 23-Jan-97 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Totals Check Number 53115 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Check Number 53116 SNYDER DRUG STORES 53116 23-Jan-97 SNYDER DRUG STORES Totals Check Number 53116 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 53117 STAR TRIBUNE 53117 23-Jan-97 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 53117 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 53110 TENNESSEE VALLEY TECHNOLOGIES 53118 31-Dec-96 TENNESSEE VALLEY TECHNOLOGIES Totals Check Number 53118 TENNESSEE VALLEY TECHNOLOGIES Check Number 53119 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 53119 53119 08-Jan-96 08-Jan-96 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Transaction Amount 280.98 280.98 6«554.87 6«5S4.87 2,261.27 2,261.27 55.39 36.58 91.97 75.00 75.00 4.03 4.03 126.50 126.50 1.23 1.23 0.85 3.61 Page 7 Comments CHESWICK-REGISTRATION FEB FEE REPAIR BROOM & TRACTOR DATER STAMP VAN ZOMEREN-97 DUES FILM DEVELOPING AD FOR POSITION GASOLINE CARD JANUARY INSURANCE JANUARY INSURANCE Mim-i 23 Jan 1997 Thu 5:44 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 53119 53119 53119 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 08-Jan-96 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 08-Jan-96 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Totals Check Number 53119 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Check Number 53120 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 53120 31-Dec-96 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Totals Check Number 53120 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Check Number 53121 WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 53121 31-Dec-96 WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Totals Check Number 53121 WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Number 53122 VOCUM OIL CO INC. 53122 31-Dec-96 YOCUM OIL CO INC, Totals Check Number 53122 YOCUM OIL CO INC, Grand Total Transaction Amount 1.55 404.89 410.90 235.32 235.32 333.64 333.64 686,529.33 Page 8 Comments JANUARY INSURANCE JANUARY INSURANCE '2 il70B OAS TANK 111.00 1997 MEMBERSHIP 111.00 FUEL OIL tm 1<i INFORMATION ITEMS ^ COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETM8 JAN 2 T 1997 OF cmroFORONO H ----------- -W-- TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 23, 1997 SUBJECT: Request for Relocation of the Intersection of Orono Lane and County Road 15 Several residents of Orono Lane have recently written letters to the City Council requesting the relocation of the intersection of Orono Lane and County Road 15 to increase the site distance in relation to the curve on County Road 15. These letters are attached. The option of relocating the Orono Lane intersection was reviewed early in the planning process for the current County Road 15 reconstruction project. The option was not pursued for several reasons. 1. It would require the acquisition of a substantial amount of additional right-of-way. 2. 3. 4. It would require the construction of a new extension or relocation of Orono Lane which would need to be located within a designated wetland. The city and county would need to mitigate the loss of a substantial amount of wetland. The property owner was very much opposed to the impact of a realigned Orono Lane on his property. The County staff have indicated the current plan for the Orono Lane intersection will significantly improve the site distance in relation to the County Road 15 curve. The County may be able to make additional adjustments to the current plan to further improve the site distance. If, upon completion of the project, these improvements are found to inadequately address the safety concerns related to the curve, a separate project to relocate the intersection could be planned. The process of planning and designing a relocation of Orono Lane and the Orono Lane intersection, and amending the current County 15 final plans to reflect the relocated intersection, would require a substantial amount of time. It would delay the County Road 15 project for a year, which would cause the funding for the project to lapse. The funding would have to be reauthorized by the County Board in competition with other County-wide priorities. Staff recommends moving forward with the Coumy Road 15 project as currently planned, and reviewing the need for additional intersection improvements after completion of the project. ELIZABETH W. NORTON 4980 DOCKSIDE DR., 9204 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33919^657 941-4S2-1988 1/13/97 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and Orono Council Members 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, 55356 Dear Madams/Sirs: I am now a resident of Florida, but I still own my home in Minnesota at 1399 Orono Lane which is in Orono. I have been trying to sell my MN home for almost two years now with no success. I have owned my home at 1399 Orono Lane since 1989 and, although I have made substantial improvements to it I have been unable to sell it for even what I paid for it back in 1989 and have come no where near to the $343,000 that the property is presently assessed at for tax purposes. (The property is currently listed at $329,000 and my highest offer so far has been $280,000). I believe that a significant determent to the sale of the property is the noise on County Rd. 15 (about which you can do little) and the danger of ingress and egress to Orono Lane which I believe you can reduce significantly. I understand that there are going to be changes in County Rd #15 at the entrance of Orono Lane. The purpose of this letter is to request that you seriously consider moving the entrance to Orono Lane from County Road #15 to the East, as has been previously recommended I believe, to reduce the danger that exists novr and which may be exacerbated if the currently proposed changes to County Rd. #15 are made. Living on the corner as I have I know how many accidents there are (some of which are probably not reported to the police) since my house is the house that is the closest to the entrance to #15 from Orono Lane and people who have crashed at the corner often request the use of my phone, usually in the middle of the night. Your actions will probably not affect me in any way, since I hope to sell my house this Spring, but for safety reasons for the future and to maintain the property values on Orono Lane, I hope that you will take any action that you can to move the entrance of Orono Lane to the East. Please listen carefully to the suggestions of my Orono Lane neighbors!! !^oeth W. "2 Eliz Norton JAN 1 5 199T AllianceCapilal received JAM 2 2 CITV OF OHONO Alliance Capital Management Corporation First Bank Place 601 Second Avenue South - Suite 5000 Minneapolis. MN 55402-4322 Tel: (612)332-1544 Fax: (612) 673-8253 Alfred Harrison Vice Chairman141*^ Shoreline Drive Hayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Reconstruction of County Road 15 Dear Mr. Gaffron: While sympathetic to the desire to improve County Road 15 I strongly urge you to be aware in your planning of the major hazard that currently exists, and which is likely to be exacerbated by my understanding of the current proposal. Already the entrance to our drive at 1410 Shoreline Drive is dangerous for my family and visitors because cars coming behind us from the direction of 394 take the corner by Orono Orchard Road at a good speed and do not expect, or believe, our right turning light means we are slowing to make a turn into our driveway. They often screech to a halt behind us at the last minute. The current proposal in widening the area from Orono Orchard Road would only increase the likelihood they will take this corner at even greater speed. Similarly any increase in speed in this area, due to widening, will make it more difficult for us to make a left access on to County Road 15 from our driveway at txie poinc where the road once again narrows to t'o lanes. What concerns us mo? t. however, is that the area immeo. stely opposite our driveway is used by hundreds of fisherma:. especially during the late spring, and is an entry poxnt Into the lake for ice fishers during the winter. Cars constantly park in the area opposite to us and add to the potential danger. Most critical in this respect is the fact that most of these fisherman are not local residents and assume that the only place to turn their cars around is to use the entrance to our driveway. Obviously this is frustrating to us, but it now creates an even greater safety problem if more people are now tempted to make these dangerous turn-arounds in a slightly wider area whiiA. cars are coming around the corner at greater speeds. This woul-1 be an accident waiting to happen! Mr. Michael P. Gaffron January 20, 1997 Page Two IPinally, I think it is unfortunate from an aesthetic standpoint that the burn (leased by us from Dakota Rail) between Orono Orchard Road and our driveway would eliminated. This provides a natural bank to the curve and its elimination will only increase the tendency to take the curve at speed when coming from downtown Minneapolis. My wife has spoke to Bob Polatchek, the design engineer, who appeared receptive to our concerns. I repeat that we encourage attempts to improve County Road 15, but ask you seriously to consider these safety hazards and be sure that any changes that are made lessen the potential for disaster rather than increase it. Please keep us informed of meetings and information that address this project. Kind regards. Yours truly, Alfred Harrison AH/meh CC: Please copy this memo fcr members of the Planning Commission , RICHARD F. NOLAND 1395 ORONO LANE WAYZAvTA. MINNESOTA 55391 ' Januar)’ 21, 1997 The Honorable Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and Orono Council Members 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Madams/Sirs: JAN 21 ISST 1 have three questions about the CSAH 15-Orono Lane/Orono Orchard Road intersection reconstruction plans of Hennepin County approved by Mayor Callahan last December 9. I'll be grateful for your written response, or f^or your redirection of this letter to the proper authority at Hennepin County Public Works for their witten response. 1. What will be our sightline distance to the west for cars traveling east? 2. Will we have a clearly designated and adequate en trance lane to the east? 3. Where will the County-approved (1993) west-view traffic mirror be relocated? With reference to the first question, our present sightline to the west gives us 2.4 seconds before an east-bound vehicle traveling 40 mph reaches Orono Lane. By my calculations. Sheet #45 of the project plans gives a new sightline of 27 meters (89 feet) which at 40 mph gives us 1.5 seconds and at 50 mph gives us 1.2 seconds. That's half the present time - since present traffic averages 45 mph and the new design will speed that up. With reference to the second question, to join east-bound traffic from Orono Lane is to enter a single lane of vehicles traveling at least 50 mph. A dedicated access lane - not just a short shoulder - seems essential. One that will be serviced by winter plows. I see nothing like that planned on Sheet #20. With reference to all three questions, safety is our concern. The safety of guest and sen ice drivers not familiar with the hazards of an intersection that is a legend in this community. The safety of the thousands of Orono residents who drive through this dangerous inter­ section on a rcaular basis. There is responsibility here and a rare opportunity to do something about it. I thank you all for your interest and your help. I look forward to hearing from you. Richard F. and Jane Thomas Noland 1395 Orono Lane Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 January 20, 1S>97 JAN 2 1 1997 The Hon. Gabriel Jabbour. Mayor it Orono City Offices 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota. 55356 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As the only resident of Orono Lane who lived here in 1929 and has seen the traffic on the Highway 15 steadily increase in volume and speed. I've become more concerned every year —every day — about safety. My fears are not only for the lives of Orono Lane residents and their visitors and service people, but all those Highway 15 drivers who zip around our blind comer from the West as we try to enter the highway from Orono Lane. In the '30s. we who were children on this lane could cross the road to pick up mail from our mailboxes (located on the north side of the highway) or wander across to Orono Orchard Road or Fox Street to visit friends. Now. a kid takes his life in his hands to cross the highway from a schoolbus stop! And there are times during weekday mornings and late afternoons when the traffic is so deadly that we've learned not to try to get in or out of Orono Lane. We plan our lives around the traffic. When my parents moved to what is now 1395 Orono Lane in 1929. we understood that Orono Lane had been part of the only road around the lake, connecting with Femdale. When the present county highway was built. It cut off that part of the old road that is now Orono Lane at a particularly dangerous spot, creating what has turned into one of the worst hazards on 15. Although Orono Lane is a city street now. the street was not—as some » might think— added as a bad idea after the present highway was built. Our lane WAS the old "highway." And the hazard was created by the county road-builders back in those very early days, (jiven this histor)'. doesn't the county bear responsibility for a safe access? Of course there's no turning back the wheels of progress —and there are a lot more wheels! But your present drawings, apparently already approved, do lot seem to solve the safety problem. If the access remains where it is. there is little hope of Orono Lane residents and visitors crossing the highway to go straight up Orono Orchard Road, or turning left to go w est. We're seldom foolhardy enough to take those chances now. and w ith an "improved" road, drivers' speeds can only increase. At the very least, wc need an access lane (kept clear of snowbanks) to join the traffic going east—and a longer sightline around the cur\ e to keep from getting broadsided. We realize that you've been tiying to deal with this problem for ten years or more, but we don't feel that it has been solved. With the impending "upgrading," this may be our only chance to try to fix it before we have more accidents and a spate of lawsuits. What can we do to help you help us? Please answer. SincerelK'\ jane Thcnhas Noland Dana M. V\’alla 1397 Orono Lane ^Vayzata, Minnesota 55391 January 20, 1997 Dear Mayor Jabbour and CounciImembers; I am writing you as a concerned citizen of Orono Lane and tne proposed changes to our access with County Road #15. The safety hazards at our intersection have become more acute every year. Now the proposed changes are guaranteed to cause more serious dangers, and more severe accidents. Pleaseiz rx wnat is needed in order to get the necessary attention? Ten years ago our neighborhood proposed an alternative Road entrance East of the existing one.Clearly, the safest solution. We were told it would not be possible to take the wetlands. But, now it is 0. K. to take the wetlands for the County Road. THIS MAKES NO SENSE! Further, Doug and Sue Johnson, the owners of that land objected to the taking of their property and threatened a law suit. So that proposal was dropped. The i^roach to the Johnsons was one of confusion because •evcoi — " . -they werevconsulted. That was unfortunate and should not be repeated. Never-the-less, it is not a good rear.on to abandon the project. Actually, the legal ramifications of taking one's land seem minor compared to the saftey ramifications of a county road. The current plan appears to take a significant portion of the but eliminates the right turn access lane we order to keepan access lane, it would require tne taking of even more wetlands. By moving the entrance of Orono Lane to the East, the current entrance could be closed off and return the existing asphalt to wetlands or trees. I greatly fdvor a new Orono Lane entrance East of the existing one. It seems the only safe way to comply with good highway design and puts no further stress on the wetlands than the existing plan with a right turn access lane. Sincerely, o. . L(J juU^ Enel. 1986 Proposal c (T ± a: <P i;/’ » •• • • • • . 11 -a.: rj. ' 1 ^ A -. It It ' niV M^f' 'N j .?^ •II n -Ft*u tt rt 1 _ ur;:. i •\^iu ,V^ H r f » _ V’> !•' ”\i'S. h <^i ;iJiy ^iVii ittytt t t‘UiJjCJC X • > nu-‘ \ ik A ' •♦ •• •in\ 6.''^ ■ > -•., ,oco\^- / <\ «? .V>^ _ f») T» ^ • ^*^*3 I > • • • ■ • ' a« ^ ' I .1 ^ .V.4*•r><•« / 1 ■?r4eoy V/,4 r •• lUi . / /!/. « J»“! ■?P.o^;,5,cw \'e»' ■EA+ey-¥x!t '^BnoWN 'TTAvhJl ,, ^Of^0W3 y^A/c ^rr II TII7 p :> ; f Bonestrooy Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W, Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612636-4600 Engineers & Architects OiM C, E. W, Htaatne. f t. Juirpt C, Amtffiik, ft, BfttfyH A. UmOetf, f.£, Michotd f. Tttfner, ft, Jumrt C CMum, ft CUnm B. Cook, f £*. Kruk A. CtttUitm. ft. Tho^% t .Vv/n. ft. Hn HmrB W. fourt, f t. Mooert C. ScMumh Hi, P.t Msriftm L, P,t. DomeiB C. Sufft4i, P. t Jtffj A. BoufOtut, ft Murk A. Hofwtm. p,t TrB t, r»HB, P.t Mt€kti T, Bawmmmm, ft. Huturt M. fJtUtfru, ft D u 9*B O. Ltaioiu, P.t rtomeM If. PrterM, ft C Lfttk, ft KoffH L, wm, p.t Umn M. MeluM, P.t ttrutftM P. AmUnrtm. P t A'tfvfA A, Bmtmmmm, P.t MrfM M. Bo(/s, ft Pobfft C Kuauk, A.tJk, Thumm E, Ampit, ft Snit tm Youmf, ft CBefka A, EtrKkyom Leo M, PewHUf Hmrtom M, OI moo SoaomM, Eberiio November 3, 1986 City or Orono Bo.c 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Atta: Mr. John Gerhardsoa Re: File No. 139 Orono Lane Dear John, We have reviewed relocating the intersection of Orono Lane and County Road 15 as requested by the property owners. The intersection should be moved approx** imately 325 feet east of the existing intersection. We would recommend that the intersection be moved far enough to provide a 350 foot sight distance for traffic coming from the west. This would be the mini­ mum sight distance for a 50 MPU design speed. Xne estimated cost to reconstruct the roadway would be $35,000. This is based on a 24 foot wide street ui*rh a bituminous berm curb. The section would con­ sist of stabilization fabric^ 2 feet of granular borrow, 8 inches of C^lass 5 and 3 inches of bituminous surfacing. Soil borings taken previously as a part of the sanitary sewer project in the area indicates organic material to 10 feet deep. The preliminary estimate is based on the underlying material being stable enough to support the proposed section. Soil borings will be necessary if the project is to proceed. The project cost would be shared by eight property owners which would result in an assessment of $4,375.00. This preliminary estimate does not anticipate any land costs for the project. I We would be pleased to meet with you and the property owners to review the new access location. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. / Glenn R. Cook GRC:li End. 0345e 30 Year Anniversary . I- WAYZATAI PLYMOUTH Week of November 17,198jS - Vol. 3; No. 33 Orono Lane hazards prompt road replacenient request by Jcdi Ehlers I “I think the first thing to be Several Orono residents, up^c ‘.done is a feasibility'study to over what they believe is an in* \ determine exactly what it would , creasingly dai\4ero»ji traffic ' .cost for the county to (to this,” I problem on Orono Lane, asked [Newell said, “and I don’t think the City Co’nci! Nov. iC to im* rpfflripnts shnnlrf h9v«> prove its safety. Newell Wekl, one of the residents, had a<dced the council to conduct a feasibility study to estimate the costs of improving the road. City engineers said the project would cost at least $35,000. • . ' • Joining Weed last week at the council meeting were fellpw itbe residents alone should have to pay for it.” ^yor Mary Butler said that £3 all her years on the City Coun­ cil she had never been asked to ‘Cmove someone’s road .... I tbink the first thing we should do is figure out whose cheddbook ‘ t^ money would be coming £n)m before we do a feasibility staidy." ____________________________________________________________________ Mowen, Dana Wells and Henry the councO would even suggest See. They said the road is a saf^ ty hazard not only to them but to. • everyone who drives past u, ?'• \ County Road 15. ’ 1 “Because Highway 15 is now a I major access road with all the construction of 1-394, the safety ; hazard to residents and anyone who uses Orono Lane is mvist serious,” Weed said: ’We feel the county should participate in , the (xist of doing something j about the problem.” 1 Orono Lane curves onto Coun- ’ ty Road 15, making it difficult to ; see oncoming cars. Although it 'j has been a problem for Orono ] Lane residents for many years, ' traffic has recently increased on County Road 15 as a result of Highway 12 constructioa Qty staff estimated the cost of building a new road 200 feet east of Orono Lane’s present en­ trance at $35,000, which would be shared by eight property owners at $4,3^ each. However, that estimate could easily in- cre^, according to city engineer Glen CooIl that residents alone pay for the new road. “Residents aren’t the only ones who would benefit from this,” he said ‘‘My wife’s cleaning lady has to walk across County Roaci 15 because the peo­ ple who drive her won’t pull into Orono Lane. It’s an exceecfingly dangerous turn made worse by the uninterrupted flow of traffic we now have because they took the stophgbt out by Chi-CU’s.” Coundlmember Tom Frahm suggested there might be an in­ termediate solution to the pro­ blem by redudng the sp^ limit on County Road 15 and moving Orono Lane. 20 feet in­ stead ^ 200. Mowen pointed out, however, that the speed limit there is already 35 mph, and people don’t be^ it City administrator Mark Ber- nhar^n said, s ace Orono Lane residents w>^ be the main beneficiaries of a new road, = financing couid DOf COme OUt of : a general property-tax assessment. N * ■ I TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 24,1997 SUBJECT: New Westonka Senior Center The Mound-Westonka School District has determined that the current community center building is to be sold. The current building houses some school district offices, a number of human services offices, and the Westonka Senior Center. The school district has determined that it will build a new facility to house the school district offices. However, the new facility will not be large enough to house either the social service agencies or the Senior Center. Advocates for the Senior Cf'nter are currently involved in a process of finding a way to construct a building to house the Seni nter. They would like all of the communities with students in the district to participate in the cost of the new facility. They have invited both elected and appointed officials from Orono to attend a meeting scheduled for 7:30 a.m. on Tuesday, February 18 at the Mound City Hall to discuss options for generating funding for a Senior Center facility. The “fforts regarding the Senior Center are being made in somewhat of a crisis mode since the current building and property could be sold at any time. Those involved in the effort need to be careful to consider all alternatives rather than jumping at the first opportunity that presents itself The group is moving toward the construction of a new facility. 1 am not aware of whether they have considered the potential of using an e.xisting facility or if there are any e.xis’ing facilities that might be able to meet their needs. % One source of funding for a facility could be CDBG grant funds. All smaller cities in western Hennepin County now must compete for approximately $180,000 of CDBG funds. Senior Center facilities are a high priority under the CDBG program. Also, if several cities submit a Joint grant application, the application will receive a higher score. : jhii «•• w ««•%%*« ««4tV*non-fatal accidents were reported in Minnesota road rights-of-way. The number one cause of snowTno- bile accidents is the driver striking a fixed object *Trappers : take note !The European Union's proposed ban on furs imported from coun ­tries that allow leghold traps is still on hold, although the coaliton has reached agreements with Russia and Canada that call for a'phase- out of Icgholds in four years. The U.S. is still'pushing for an exemp- e .* **» V I* •...Benefit for Ron Fisher SET FOR Fe13. 9 Friends of Ron Fisher, a familiar face at Joe Sporting Goods in St. Paul and an avid ouldoorsmon, can attend a special fund-raising benefit at the Hoggsbreath Saloon and Eatery in Little Canada Feb. 9 from 3 to 6 p.m. Fisher broke his back last fall when he fell from a roof and is experiencing a long and dif ­ ficult recovery. . * « benefit will raise money for Eving and medical expenses for the Fisher family. A Goods.•• • W •# < (From Pago 2) , , if hunting is to continue, we need everyone's help in stopping these cj'cles, nature will bear only so much. . • Patrick Wilcox . Minneapolis, Minn. Maxwell Bay Public Access is closed now Are you aware that Maxwell Bay Public Access is closed to the public in the w'inter months? An access that was purchased partly with our fishing license money and the rest funded by and approved by our Minnesota State Legislature. The DNK was going . to open it Jan. 1,1997, after doing extensive tests to ensure that all safety standards were met, but was forced to leave it closed because of our local Orono Qty Dictatorship. Concerned Fisher- persons should call Mayor JAB- BOUR of Orono at 473-7358 and ask him v\^hy ii is closed. It is a sad state of affairs when a local government has gotten so much control that our rights as Fishermen and Fisherwomen has been taken nw^ay from us. Thi: is the only Public Access in our State that is closed just because of the Orono City Officials that we mistakenly elected. Just to refresh your minds, it wms the Citv of Orono that put up the "N.. Farking/Tow Away Zone" ’ ;. signs on Cty. Rd 51 and Tonkawa ; Rd. Don't let your rights be taken away any more,... SPEAK UP ... / Jeremy J Langanki . Sue Langanki Long Lake MN IMAGINE... . ju6t you, the fish, and the wilderness!. Our fly-in resort is located at Pickle Like, ^ Ontario - about 330 nules north of International Falls, Af/V. We have nine outpost camps on nine different Inlr^. These ramn^ rr,** he reot h^d 15 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES WILL REQUIRE ANNUAL PASSHunters, birders and other users of 15 selected national wildlife refuges will be charged $10 to $15 for an annual pass to tne refuge beginning next spring. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) established the fees to boost rev- enuca lor the underfunded refuge system. The USFWS eventually plans to extend the fee to 41 heavily Golden Acces;CampingJan .Minnesotan look at new t and camping Greater No Camping, ani runs January ; Minneapolis < The show wi exhibitors. Hip dal travel pres and Grand Ca The All-T 30th ANNUAL GREATER NORTHWES1 VACATION &R.V.S CO-SpOHM JANUARYi29 MINNEAPOUS CO MOTORHOMES MINt.HOMES-TRAVa'nUll£RS-5T)i W. MOTOR CYCLES-PEHSOtai W/ .TR CRAFT-TEHTS- CAM PC CANOE OUTFITTERS • CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE • PtCX-UF: hSee: Wes ___ Harrlson®^'^ "Mr Sound Ef facto* Footprlis't < Try your •kltt* on ON SCREl "The Adventuimmm By Outdoor Spoclal SpMlal Pre ONNAnOfULMIV w«.« •..**« r. wr. :ci, AO•AtmSIO^ SHOW HOURS Wed__1PM<tPy Thtffi..^.1PM. tPM Frl__tPM • 10PM Set__10AM • 10PM Sun__11AM- 5PM iREGISTER TO WIN! ‘ Courtosy of: XC AARCEE TRAILERS & H MINNEAPOLIS CONVENTI I Discouni coupons avMtoble at partioiMlgig RV Dcalm. Umied Slom. Burger B t •...wo Save IV. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 24, 1997 SUBJECT: Highway 12/Long Lake Storm Water Management Plan One of the 14 conditions the city of Long Lake placed on its approval of the Alternate 6 Highway 12 corridor proposal was that MnDOT provide storm water facilities to serve a substantial portion of the city of Long Lake. As the first step in addressing this condition MnDOT coordinated a meeting to begin a study of storm water drainage in the proposed corridor area on Friday, January 24. In attendance at the meeting were representatives from; MnDOT preliminary design, MnDOT water resources (storm water modeling), the city of Long Lake, the city of Orono, the MCWD, the DNR, and the Corps of Engineers. The city of Long Lake's goals related to storm water facilities are two fold. 1. 2. Creation of a sub-regional storm water pond to handle all or nearly all of Long Lake's storm water drainage - particularly from the downtown/commercial/industrial area - so that Long Lake does not have to provide any other ponding. Diversion of all storm water that currently runs from Long Lake (city) to Long Lake (lake) away from the lake and instead into a sub-regional storm water pond to protect the water quality of the lake. MnDOT water resources staff will be developing a storm water drainage model and plan with input from the affected cities and agencies. Several *ssues that city of Orono needs to ensure are addressed in this process are as follows: 1. 2. 3. What arc the impacts of diverting all of Long Lake's storm water drainage away from Long Lake (lake) and into a storm water pond. i.e. Impacts down stream of the storm water pond in Orono particularly during a 10 or 50 year storm. Can Orono benefit irom the regional pond by eliminating or minimizing the need for ponding to serve development on the north side of Highway 12. Is the city willing to participate in the cost of the storm water improvements if there is significant benefit to the city. PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 01/02/97 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * * * «PAGE: 1REQUESTER; LIN PERMIT TYPE Building SGL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/RBMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/REMODEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-ADD/REMODEL SP-LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical QTY 43 261 29 12 2 7 0 2 3 0 1 3 21 384* -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 12/3x/9G BASE FEE 83,299 57,765 4,066 800 13,139 1,876 0 110 2,349 0 0 90 4,364 167,861 .25 .25 .75 .00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .25 .00 .00 .00 .75 .00* VALUATION 13,369,121.58 4,679,992.00 248.982.00 0.00 3,140,631.20 179.026.00 0.00 0.00 252.720.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 302.592.00 22,173,064.78* HEATING SYSTEMS 114 10 180.88 785,097.28 AIR CONDITIONING 16 772.40 53,051.00 WOOD STOVE/FLUE 4 167.01 7,760.43 PIREPIJVCE 64 2,657.59 150,555.44 VENTILATION 5 175.00 5,375.00 FUEL STORAGE 2 347.50 26,000.00 GAS LINE INSPECT 13 645.00 27,200.00 DUCT WORK ONLY 12 462.94 16,820.00 REFRID/COMMERCL 1 189.25 15,140.00 REMOVE OIL TANK 11 405.00 16,105.00 UNDEFINED 0 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 242*16,002.57*1,103,104.15* Plumbing FIXTURES 162 11,514.40 728,709.47 SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0.00 WATER METER 11 2,457.90 2,750.00 UNDEFINED 4 140.00 1,150.00 Sub-total 177*14,112.30*732,609.47* Sewer k Water - SEWER CONNECTION 21 735.00 0.00 WATER CONNECTION 2 70.00 0.00 NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 55 5,450.00 0.00 DRNFLD Ct/OR TANK 8 400.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 11 6,550.00 0.00 SEWER DISCONNECT 1 35.00 0.00 SEWER k WATER 10 700.00 0.00 Sub-total 108*13,940.00*0.00* Sign PERMANENT/POSTED 1 35.00 0.00 PER./FREE STANDG 2 366.50 24,305.00 98,532.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 CO 00 00* 379* -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 12/31/95 PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 54 . ^44.41 43 78,383.60 13,615,028.00 50,947.94 ..8,575.49 24 3 60,571.25 6,387,783.00 31,350.05 2,410.55 31 4,660.50 452,500.00 2,898.02 0.00 15 1,010.00 0.00 0.00 8. S40.84 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 496.60 12 3,461.75 455,467.00 617.66 0.00 1 529.75 45,000.00 344.34 0.00 3 130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 331.25 17,800.00 158.60 O.CO 1 72.00 5,000.00 46.80 1,714.21 1 0.00 550,000.00 1,423.18 0.00 8 260.00 0.00 0.00 2,650.71 18 3,636.25 240,487.50 2,349.91 153,046.35* 21,769,065.50* 0.00 0.00 83 6,718.54 513,516.27 17 1,102.09 73,272.00 1 35.00 1,500.00 63 2,665.01 148,174.00 4 175.63 9,525.00 0 0.00 0.00 10 350.00 4,750.00 9 315.00 9,165.00 0 0.00 0.00 10 483.13 24,900.00 1 247.50 19,800.00 198*12,091.90*804,602.27* 134 9,bl4.48 634,759.84 1 162.50 13,000.00 5 O17.00 1,200.00 4 161.25 6,200.00 144*10,555.23*655,159.84* 14 490.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 38 3,800.00 0.00 5 250.00 0.00 7 5,950.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 2 140.00 0.00 70*10,770.CJ*0.00* 3 105.00 2,670.00 2 70.00 400.00 90,136.50* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DflTEREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO *****PAGE:REQUESTER: LIN -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 12/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 12/31/95 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW TEMPORARY 8 240.00 0.00 0.00 12 480.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-tota?11*641.50*24,305.00*0.00*17*655.00*3,070.00*0.00* Fire FIREWORKS 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 FIRE SPRINKLER 1 170.64 13,651.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*170.64*13,651.00*0.00*3*150.00*0.00*0.00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION 23 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 18 935.00 3,000.00 0.00 TREE REMOVAL 5 150.00 0.00 0.00 5 150.00 0.00 0.00 RETAINING WALLS 4 396.00 29,7*90.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 DOCKS 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 O.CO 0.00 LAWN SPRINKLER 26 910.00 0.00 0.00 11 385.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 60*2,816.00*29,790.00*0.00*35*1,570.00*3,000.00*0.00* Grand-total S83**215,544.01**24,076,524.40**98,532.81**846**188,838.48**23,234,897.61**90,136.50** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RIW^ 01/02 '97 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORTBASE PEEPLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie, SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN FEE MOIL IN ENGINEERING FEES PLANT CHARGE SEWER PLANT SAC PEE ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION ADDL SAC MAIL IN PEE MQIL IN ENGINEERING FEES PLANT CHARGE SEWER PLANT SAC FEE ESCROW PERMIT TOTAI BUILDING167,861.0098,532.01 10,970.17 0.00 40,450.00 1,122.50 0.00 1.50 1,830.00 225.00 225.00 0.00 321,217.98 REPORT TOTAL 215,'"44.01 90,532.01 12,006.38 0.00 42,250.00 1,157.50 0.00 305.30 1,030.00 50.00 1.50 3.00 50.00 225.00 225.00 50.00 0.00 372,230.5«" * * * * •CITY OF ORONO *FROM 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96MECHANICAL16,002.570.00 557.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192.60 3.00 0.00 16,755.98 PLUMBING14,112.300.00 385.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.78 1.50 0.00 14,600.52 SEWER U WATER 13,940.00 0.00 48.50 0.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 15,094.50 USER2,816.000.00 25.38 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 3.00 50.00 0.00 2,929.38 PAGE:REQUESTER: LINSIGN641.500.00 11.75 0.00 O.OG 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 654.75 FIRE170.640.00 6.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177.47 I $ 1 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 REPORT NBR, BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECT YEAR-TO-DATE• PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * * • *PAGE:REQUESTER: LIN-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/96 - 12/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/95 - 12/31/95 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW User Defined _ .. SUBDIVISION 14 8,420.00 0.00 0.00 18 7,615.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 53 11,065.00 0.00 0.00 54 11,050.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 13 3,100.00 0.00 0.00 16 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 5 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 10 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 7 1,940.00 c.oo 0.00 10 3,525.00 0.00 3.00 VACATION 5 1,450.00 0.00 0.00 4 1,425.00 0.00 0.00 REZONING 2 350.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 APPEAL 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 100*28,775.00*0.00*0.00*113*20,640.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 100**28,775.00**0.00**0.00**113**28,640.00**0.00**0.00** * * * * *PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 28,775.00 28,775.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 28,775.00 20,775.00 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN 1996 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIESJanuary February March April May June July August September October November December YTD TotalsSpring Parle Plan Review Inspections Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 82.87 390.00 2S.00 A97.87 0 26 438.59 120.00 25.00 583.59 1 8 200.36 195.00 25.00 420.36 2 13 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review Inspections Retainer TOTAL No. Plan Reviews No. Inspections 0.00 135.00 25.00 160.00 0 9 772.37 30.00 25.00 827.37 2 2 511.55 30.00 25.00 566.55 2 2 657.87 1,410.96 986.91 0.00 576.71 105.30 3,243.33 723.94 4,383.11 607.27 0.00 0.00 9,754.21 285.00 135.00 150.00 195.00 180.00 330.00 255.00 210.00 165.00 2,155.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25. OU 25.00 25.00 300.00 310.00 736.71 280.30 3,463.33 928.94 4,738.11 887.27 235.00 190.00 13,271.48 0 1 2 6 5 2 2 0 0 21 IV 9 10 13 12 22 17 14 11 174 744.57 308.43 1,480.04 146.09 194.68 0.00 1,489.15 0.00 1,949.67 7,596.55 75.00 135.00 60.00 210.00 135.00 105.00 90.00 75.00 105.00 1,185.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.r 300.00 844.57 468.43 1,565.04 381.09 354.68 130.00 1,604.15 100.00 2,079.o;9,081.55 3 2 4 1 ?0 6 0 2 • 5 9 4 14 9 7 6 5 7 79 ,154.57 1,205.14 1,845.34 3,844.42 1,283.62 4,868.11 2,491.42 335.00 2,269.67 22,353.03 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED DECEMBER 1996REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO « * A * *PAGE: 1REQUESTER: LIN-- CURRENT RANGE - 12/01/96 - 12/31/96 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 12/01/95 - 12/31/95 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Building SGL FAMILY NEW 2 3,564.50 558,000.00 2,316.92 4 7,839.00 1,257,500.00 5,095.34 SF-ADD/REMODEL 18 6,845.00 677,200.00 -1,032.59 10 5,084.00 637,702.00 2,823.76 SF-ACC STRUCTURE 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEMO/PRINCIPAL 1 80.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL-NEW 1 8,191.25 2,155,631.20 5,324.31 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEMO-ACCESSORY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 ACC/GARAGES 2 1,077.50 92,000.00 700.38 1 174.75 10,570.00 113.59 Sub-total 25»19,808.25*3,482,831.20*.2,374.20*16*13,127.75*1,905,772.00*8,032.69* Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS 15 965.30 73,014.00 0.00 14 742.43 54,721.89 0.00 AIR CONDITIONING 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 8,000.00 0.00 FIREPLACE 6 2‘‘0.0r 8,100.00 0.00 7 256.25 14,600.00 0.00 GAS LINE INSPECT 1 35.00 525.00 0.00 1 35.00 400.00 0.00 DUCT WORK ONLY 1 35.00 900.00 0.00 1 35.00 2,100.00 0.00 REFRID/COMMERCL 1 189.25 15,140.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 REMOVE OIL TANK 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 43.13 3,450.00 0.00 Sub-total 24*1,434.55*97,679.00*0.00*25*1,211.81*83,271.89*0.00* Plumbing FIXTURES 10 905.19 63,818.00 0.00 9 647.50 41,358.00 0.00 WATER METER 1 955.90 0.00 0.00 1 135.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total !!♦1,861.09*63,818.00*0.00*10*782.50*41,358.00*0.00* Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION 1 35.00 C.OO 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 DRNFLD &/OR TANK 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 3*185.00*0.00*0.00*1*100.00*0.00*0.00* Sign PERMANENT/POSTED 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,170.00 0.00 TEMPORARY 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 4*120.00*0.00*0.00*3*!?5.00*1,170.00*0.00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION 1 75.00 0.00 0.00 2 125.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*75.00*0.00*0.00*2*125.00*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 68**23,483.89**3,644,328.20**12,374.20**57**15,442.06**2,031,571.89**8,032.69* REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 PERMITS ISSUBD/FEES COLLE3CTEDBUILDINGMECHANICALPERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/96 TO 12/31/96PLUMBING SEWER U WATER DECaiBER 1996USER PAGE: 30REQUESTER: LINSIGNFIRE BASE FEE 19,808.25 PLAN REVIEW 12,374.20 SURCHARGE 1,611.92 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 10,800.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 M.ML IN ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 44,594.37 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl- DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 1 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 23,483.89 PLAN REVIEW 12,374.20 SURCHARGE 1,695.36 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 10,800.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 25.48 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL m 48,378.93 1,434.55 0.00 49.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.98 0.00 1,504.66 1,861.09 0.00 32.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 1,898.40 185.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 186.50 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/96 TO 12/31/96 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE: 31 REQUESTER: LIN THU, JAN 2, 1997, 3:57 PM PAGE 1PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET DECEMBER 1996 ISSUED PERMIT NDR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OKSERSTRO^.190.000. 00 360.000. 00 MORSE 80,000.00 SUTHERLAND 20,000.00 HAGLUND 80,000.00 WAGENER 10,000.00 PICHELMAN 200,000.00 DEVRIES 40,000.00 MARFIELD 50,000.00 DOUGAN 42,000.00 WOLLNER 3,000.00 PURDY 5,000.00 DOUGALL 2,000.00 JOHNSON 4,250.00 DUNLAP 23,900.00 OKERSTROM .00 PICHELMAN .00 ENGEBRETSON 2,155,631.20 COLSON 350.00 ENDERLEIN 400.00 DONALDSON 100,000.00 LABATT 10,000.00 NORSTAD 35,000.00 OSBORNE 48,000.00 CASEY 14,500.00 JOHNSON 9,000.00 1,100.00 KEITH 525.00 MEZZENGA 2,500.00 EDIN 3.500.00 7.500.00 CUSICK 1,000.00 1,100.00 EIDEN 6.500.00 12,000.00 8.145.00 6.500.00 1.100.00 JOHNSON 2,300.00 KOVACEVICH 900.00 15,140.00 OLSON 1,890.00 DONGOSKE 1,600.00 BROOKS 2,600.00 WELCH 4,159.00 THOMAS 2,600.00 TRAPANESE 1,400.00 HILL 3,120.00 CUSICK 1,500.00 RUSSELL 12,500.00 25C MB 24C PL 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 03 04 04 06 11 11 11 11 16 16 19 24 24 29 29 29 29 29 25C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 06 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 29 24C 770 880 2080 1365 4590 1420 2920 2180 2445 2785 1030 1975 3129 3818 1640 770 2920 1025 180 1335 555 3202 2811 360 255 4520 1030 1045 4105 3025 2760 965 2760 2695 2005 3065 770 770 2335 1580 3340 160 4250 905 2172 2640 3165 3508 9^5 3050 TONKAWA RD OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S SPATES AVE ARBOR ST NORTH ARM DR W BOHNS PT RD CASCO POINT RD ABINGDON WAY NORTH SHORE DR WHITE OAK CIR LOMA LINDA AVE FAGERNESS POINT RD CASCO CIR NORTH SHORE DR BOHNS PT RD TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N NORTH SHORE DR W BRIAR ST FERNDALE RD N NORTH SHORE DR CASCO POINT RD ORONO ORCHARD RD S LANDMARK DR WATERTOWN RD TONKAWA RD EDGEWOOD HILLS RD HIGHWOOD RD CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN RD EDGEWOOD HILLS RD WATERTOWN RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W SUGARWOOD DR WATERTOWN RD TONKAWA RD TONKAWA RD SHADOWOOD DR BOHNS PT RD SHORELINE DR CYGNET PL FOREST LAKE DR FERNDALE RD W SHADYWOOD RD WATERTOWN RD NORTH SHORE DR LYRIC AVE EDGEWOOD HILLS RD SUSSEX RD OR OR OR OR OR OR 96/12/10 OR 9C/12/18 OR 96/12/03 96/12/03 96/12/09 OR 96/12/26 OR 96/12/31 OR 96/12/04 96/12/04 96/12/18 96/12/13 96/12/11 OR 96/12/18 OR 96/12/18 OR 96/12/18 OR 96/12/09 OR 96/12/30 OR 96/12/31 OR 96/12/02 96/12/26 96/12/09 96/12/10 96/12/10 OR 96/12/26 OR 96/12/31 OR OR OR OR OR- 008618 008633 008598 008603 008605 008654 008662 008599 008604 008637 008445 008612 008641 008642 008643 008614 008639 00866C 008594 008656 008613 008615 008621 008638 008665 14975234 14732588 14766900 14792495 14748077 00000000 14710532 19291536 00000000 14768272 14721005 15461300 14710835 14726539 15935325 14975234 14710532 17867711 00000000 00000000 15959265 00000000 00000000 19288813 14700671 VISION BUILDERS LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT ODIN BUILDERS DONALD AHLSTROM PETER BOYER CONSTRUCTION DANBERRY COMPANY DAVID PINSKE DESIGN & BUIL OSTROM CURT DRS HOME REPAIR U REMODEL GIERTSEN COMPANY THE BURNEVIK COMPANY SMITH WF ROOFING ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC VISION BUILDERS DANBERRY COMPANY KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST LARSON KEN CONSTRUCTION CLARK SMITH CONST INC TERRY HOCJT HOMES INC 96/12/03 96/12/02 96/12/V.5 96/12/10 96/12/13 96/12/13 96/12/13 96/12/17 96/12/19 96/12/23 96/12/23 96/12/23 96/12/27 96/12/31 96/12/02 96/12/13 96/12/06 96/12/16 96/12/26 96/12/13 96/12/13 96/12/30 96/12/31 96/12/12 OR-008601 OR-008602 OR-008C07 OR-008616 OR-008620 OR-008G29 OR-008632 OR-008640 OR-008645 OR-008649 OR-008652 OR-008653 OR-008658 OR-008663 OR-008596 OR-008630 OR-008G09 OR-008G25 OR-008626 OR-008627 OR-008631 OR-008659 OR-008664 OK-008522 36825295 363325G1 34282820 37845241 34791600 34G0C022 35453797 36332501 34283077 24796715 34972290 34972290 36332561 35463777 39296767 34745451 34789558 35378491 39203800 34753309 34458585 3941^211 34789558 35453797 VARNER SHEET METAL FIRESIDE CORNER PRACTICAL SYSTEMS ST. MARIE SHEET METAL. COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C CONTROLLED AIR M H SEIFERT CONST FIRESIDE CORNER HEATING fit COOLING TWO KINGSWAY PLUMBING B & D PLUMBING k HEATING B k D PLUMBING & HEATING FIRESIDE CORNER BUILDERS EXPRESS VOGT FRED k CO MORGAN STAN k ASSOCIATES DirrER INC SUPERIOR CONTR INC CRONSTROMS HTG k AC RESIDENTIAL HEATING RON'S MECH INC KLEVb HTC k AC DITTER INC M H SEIFERT CONST INC INC k AC 96/12/10 OR-008C20 20332521 THOMPSON PI^^G THU. JAN 2, 1997, 3:57 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF DBCEMBEJR 1996 PAGE 2PERMITWORKAODRNBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONPL012760WATERTOWN RD 96/12/17 OR-008635 24612749 NYBO-PETERSON PLBG LUND 9,000.00 01 2005 SUGARWOOD DR 96/12/23 OR-008648 24796715 KINGSWAY PLUMBING 15,000.00 01 770 TONKAWA RD 96/12/23 OR-008650 24972290 BUD PLUMBING U HEATING 7,945.00 01 3065 WATERTOWN RD 96/12/23 OR-008651 24972290 B lit D PLUMBING U HEATING 11,770.00 01 575 SUSSEX CIR 96/12/30 OR-008660 24340445 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS 1,400.00 02 2811 CASCO POINT RD 96/12/17 OR-008634 24612749 NYBO-PETERSON PLBG NORSTED 5,000.00 19 3340 SHORELINE DR 96/12/31 OR-008661 24720805 ALS MASTER PLUMBING O’SULLIVAN .00 24 3640 BAYSIDE RD 96/12/12 OR-008623 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.OLSON 900.00 24 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD 96/12/18 OR-008644 25334357 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING STOYKE 203.00 24 2675 SHADYWOOD RD 96/12/23 OR-00864G 00000000 HEGENES 100.00lielie SI 13 2395 BLAINE AVE 96/12/02 OR-008595 00000000 WEEKS .00 13 2420 SHADYWOOD RD 96/12/05 OR-008608 00000000 .00 13 3333 SHORELINE DR 96/12/06 OR-008611 00000000 BLOOMQUIST .00 13 3340 SHORELINE DR 96/12/26 OR-008657 00000000 O’SULLIVAN .00 4C 4C SW 01 2725 RAINEY RD 96/12/02 OR-008597 57237155 CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC KAHLER .00 01 2760 WATERTOWN RD 96/12/04 OR-00860C 56572548 MARTY EXCAVATING LUND .00 01 3630 EILEEN ST 96/12/23 OR-008647 54734300 SULLIVAN’S UTILITY SERVICE ILSE .00 3C 3C UD 23 2990 SOMERSET LA 90/12/06 OR-008C10 19384133 130LLIG St SONS KRAMER .00 1C 1C 66C 3,644,328.20* 01 Residence 24.02 Addition 2503Garage/Attached 2604Garage/Detached 27 05 Porch 2806Deck29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 3210Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 3412Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined Replacing ExistingLifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Ranovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal LOCAL DSB CODES 9999 Undefined THU, JAN 2, 1997, 3:57 PMNUMERICAL LISTING PERMIT NBR ISSUED PAGE 1DECEMBER 1996 CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 06 14721005 DRS HOME REPAIR & REMODEL WOLLNER 3,800.00 24 00000000 COLSON 350.00 13 00000000 WEEKS .00 02 39296767 VOGT FRED U CO KOVACEVICH 900.00 01 57237155 CLOVER HILL COMPANY INC KAHLER .00 02 14766900 ODIN BUILDERS MORSE 80,000.00 03 19291536 DAVID PINSKE DESIGN U BUIL DEVRIES 40,000.00 01 36825295 VARNER SHEET METAL JOHNSON 9,000.00 01 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 1,100.00 02 14792495 DONALD AHLSTRCM SUTHERLAND 20,000.00 04 00000000 MARFIELD 50,000.00 02 14748077 PETER BOYER CONSTRUCTION HAGLUND 80,000.00 01 56572548 MARTY EXCAVATING LUND .00 01 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS KEITH 525.00 13 00000000 .00 24 34789558 DITTER INC OLSON 1,890.00 23 19384133 BOLLIG u SONS KRAMER .00 13 00000000 BLOOMQUIST .00 11 15461300 GIERTSEN COMPANY PURDY 5,000.00 29 15959205 LARSON KEN CONSTRUCTION DONALDSON 100,000.00 16 14975234 VISION BUILDERS OKERSTKOM .00 29 00000000 LABATT 10,000.00 01 37845241 ST. M^RIF SHEET METAL, INC MEZZENGA 2,500.00 01 14975234 VISION BUILDERS OKSERSTROM 198,000.00 01 29332521 THOMPSON PLBG RUSSELL 12,500.00 29 00000000 NORSTAD 35,000.00 29 35453797 M H SEIFERT CONST CUSICK 1,500.00 24 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.OLSON 900.00 24 35378491 SUPERIOR CONTR INC DONGOSKE 1,600.00 24 39203800 CRONS.TROMS HTG fii AC INC BROOKS 2,600.00 24 34753309 RESIDENTIAL HEATING U AC WELCH 4,159.00 01 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTC A/C EDIN 3,500.00 01 34C0C022 CONTROLLED AIR 7,500.00 06 34745451 MORGAN STAN k ASSOCIATES 15,140.00 24 34458585 RON’S MECH INC THOMAS 2,600.00 01 35453797 M H SFIrERT CONST CUSICK 1,000.00 01 14732588 LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT 360,000.00 02 24612749 NYdO-PETERSON PLBG WORSTED 5,000.00 01 ?4612';49 NYBO-PETERSON PLBG LUND 9,000.00 04 14768272 OSTROM CURT DOUGAN 42,000.00 29 19288813 CLARK SMITH CONST INC OSBORNE 48,000.00 16 14710532 DANBERRY COMPANY PICHELMAN .00 01 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 1,100.00 11 14710835 THE B’JRNEVIK COMPANY DOUGALL 2,000.00 11 14726539 SMITH WF ROOFING JOHNSON 4,250.00 11 15935325 ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC DUNLAP 23,900.00 24 25334357 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING STOYKE 203.00 01 34283677 HEATING & COOLING TWO El DSN 6,500.00 24 00000000 HEGENES 100.00 01 54734300 SULLIVAN’S UTILITY SERVICE ILSE .00 01 24796715 KINGSWAY PLUMBING 15,000.00 01 24796715 KINGSWAY PLUMBING 12,000.00 01 24972290 B & D PLUMBING k HEATING 7,945.00 01 24972290 b k D PLUMBING k HEATING 11,770.90 OR-008445 OR-008594 OR-008595 OR-008596 OR-008597 OR-008598 OR-008599 OR-008601 OR-008602 OR-008603 OR-008604 OR-008605 OR-008606 OR-008607 OR-008608 OR-008609 OR-008610 OR-008611 OR-008612 OR-008613 OR-008614 OR-008615 OR-008616 OR-008618 OR-008620 OR-008621 OR-008622 OR-008623 OR-008625 OR-008626 OR-008627 OR-008628 OR-008629 OR-008630 OR-008631 OR-008632 OR-008633 OR-008634 OR-008635 OR-008637 OR-008638 OR-008639 OR-008640 OR-C08641 OR-008642 OR-OC8643 OR-008644 OR-00864S OR-008646 OR-008647 OR-008648 OR-008649 OR-008650 OF(-008651 96/12/13 N 1030 96/12/02 N 180 96/12/02 N 2395 96/12/02 N 1580 96/12/02 N 2725 96/12/03 N 2080 96/12/04 N 2180 96/12/03 N 4520 96/12/02 N 1030 96/12/03 N 1365 96/12/04 N 2445 96/12/09 N 4590 96/12/04 N 2760 96/12/05 N 1045 96/12/05 N 2420 96/12/06 N 160 96/12/06 N 2990 96/12/06 N 3333 96/12/11 N 1975 96/12/09 N 555 96/12/09 N 770 96/12/10 N 3202 96/12/10 N 4105 96/12/10 N 770 96/12/10 N 3050 96/12/10 N 2811 96/12/12 N 965 96/12/12 N 3640 96/12/16 N 4250 96/12/26 N 905 96/12/13 N 2172 96/12/13 N 3025 96/12/13 N 2760 96/12/13 N 3340 96/12/13 N 2640 96/12/13 N 965 96/12/18 N 880 96/12/17 N 2811 96/12/17 N 2760 96/12/18 N 2785 96/12/26 N 360 96/12/30 N 2920 96/12/17 N 2760 96/12/18 N 3129 96/12/18 N 3818 96/12/18 N 1640 96/12/18 1,3339 96/12/19 N 2695 96/12/23 N 2675 96/12/23 N 3630 96/12/23 N 2005 96/12/23 N 2005 96/12/23 N 770 96/12/23 H 3065 LOMA LINDA AVE NORTH SHORE DR W BLAINE AVE BOHNS PT RD RAINEY RD SPATES AVE ABINGDON WAY WATERTOWN RD TONKAWA RD ARBOR ST NORTH SHORE DR NORTH ARM DR W WATERTOWN RD EDGEWOOD HILLS RD SHADYWOOD RD CYGNET PL SOMERSET LA SHORELINE DR EAGERNESS POINT RD FERNDALE RD N TONKAWA RD NORTH SHORE DR HIGHWOOD RD TONKAWA RD SUSSEX RD CASCO POINT RD EDGEWOOD HILLS RD BAYSIDE RD FOREST LAKE DR FERNDALE RD W SHADYWOOD RD CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN RD SHORELINE DR WATERTO!’N RD EDGEWOOD HILLS RD OLL CRYSTAL BAY RD CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN RD WHITE OAK CIR ORONO ORCHARD RD S CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN PD rASCO CIR NORTH SHORE DR BOHNS PT RD CRYSTAL BAY RD COUNTRYSIDE DR W SHADYWOOD RD EILEEN ST SUGARWOOD DR SUGARWOOD DR TONKAWA RD WATERTOWN RD THU, JAN 2, 1997, 3:57 PM PAGE 2NUMERICAL LISTING DECEMBER 1996PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-006652 96/12/23 N 3065 WATERTOWN RD 01 34972290 B & D PLUMBING U HEATING 8,145.00 OR-008653 96/12/23 N 770 TONKAWA RD 01 3497229 i B & D PLUMBING fit HEATING 6,500.00 OR-008654 96/l2/'>6 N 1420 BOHNS PT RD 02 00000000 WAGENER 10,000.00 OR-008656 96/12/26 N 1335 BRIAR ST 24 00000000 ENDERLEIN 400.00 OR-008657 96/12/26 N 3340 SHORELINE DR 13 00000000 O'SULLIVAN .00 OR-00^)658 96/12/27 N 770 TONKAWA RD 01 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 1,100.00 OR-008659 96/12/30 N 3165 NORTH SHORE DR 24 39414211 KLEVE HTG k AC TRAPANESE 1,400.00 OR-008660 96/12/30 N 575 SUSSEX CIR 01 24340445 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS 1,400.00 OR-008661 96/12/31 N 3340 SHORELINE DR 19 24720805 ALS MASTER PLUMBING O'SULLIVAN .00 OR-008662 96/12/31 N 2920 CASCO POINT RD 02 14710532 DANBERRY COMPANY PICHELMAN 200,000.00 OR-008663 96/12/31 N 2335 SHADUWOOD DR 01 35463777 BUILDERS EXPRESS JOHNSON 2,300.00 OR-008664 96/12/31 N 3508 LYRIC AVE 24 34789558 DirrER INC HILL 3,120.00 OR-008665 96/12/31 N 255 LANDMARK DR 29 14700671 TERRY HOGT HOMES INC CASEY 14,500.00 OR-008666 96/12/31 N 1025 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 19 17867711 KRAUS ANDERSON MIDWEST ENGEDRETSON 2,155,631.20 68C ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 * * * * *PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * * * *-- CURRENT RANGE - 12/01/96 - 12/31/96 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY User Defined SUBDIVISION VARIANCE CUP SKETCH PLAN VARIANCE/CUP VACATION Sub-total 1 1 1 1 0 1 5* 1,525 320 0 300 0 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 Grand-total 5*^ 2,445.00* 2,445.00** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 3 4 0 1 2 1 11* 0.00**0.00**11** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 01/02/97 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT *♦**» CITY OF ORONO FROM 12/01/96 TO 12/31/96 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 2,445.00 2,445.00 PLAN REVIBtf 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 2,445.00 2,445.00 PAGE: 1REQUESTER: LIN-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 12/01/95 - 12/31/95 BASE FEE 800 850 0 200 650 250 00 00 00 00 00 00 2,750.00* 2,750.00** VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00**0.00** PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: LIN ELIZABETH W. NORTON 4980 DOCKSIDE DR., 0204 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33919^667 »41-492 ‘19n 1/13/97 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and Orono Council Members 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono. 55356 Dear Madams/Sirs: I am now a resident of Florida, but I still own my home in Minnesota at 1399 Orono Lane which is in Orono. I have been trying to sell my MN home for almost two years now with no success. I have owned my home at 1399 Orono Lane since 1989 and, although I have made substantial improvements to it I have been unable to sell it for even what I paid for it back in 1989 and have come no where near to the $343,000 that the property is presently assessed at for tax purposes. (The property is currently listed at $329,000 and my highest offer so far has been $280,000). I believe that a significant deteriment to the sale of the property is the noise on County Rd. 15 (about which you can do little) and the danger of ingress and egress to Orono Lane which I believe you can reduce significantly. I understand that there are going to be changes in County Rd #15 at the entrance of Orono Lane. The purpose of this letter is to request that you seriously consider moving the entrance to Orono Lane from County Road #15 to the East, as has been previously recommended I believe, to reduce the danger that exists now and which may be exacerbated if the currently proposed changes to County Rd. #15 are made. Living on the corner as I have I know how many accidents there are (some of which are probably not reported to the police) since my house is the house that is the closest to the entrance to #15 from Orono Lane and people who have crashed at the corner often request the use of my phone, usually in the middle of the night. Your actions will probably not affect me in any way, since I hope to sell my house this Spring, but for safety reasons for the future and to maintain the property values on Orono Lane, I hope that you will take any action that you can to move the entrance of Orono Lane to the East. Please listen carefully to the suggestions of my Orono Lane neighbors!! "I Vei Elizabeth W. Nortony JAN 1 5 1997 -c : t L._