The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-16-1984 Planning Packetar PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JULY 16, 1984 7:30 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS Council Representative •- James Grabek Public Hearings t !• 7:30 p.m. #839 Jeff Stebbins, 2195 Watertown Road Subdivision 2.7:45 p.m. #840 Ned Dayton, 2300 North Shore Drive 17 Unit PRD Subdivision 3.8:00 p.m. #841 Craig Winters, 888 Plentywood Drive 9 Unit PRD Subdivision Action Items 4.#783 I.D. Caples, 4798 North Shore Drive Variance 5.#827 C.D. Williams, 1932 Fagerness Point Road Variance 6.#€42 Robert Zimmerman, 3415 Crystal Bay Road Variance - Public Hearing 7.#843 Jeff Ulku, 1416 Be\dur Park Road Variance - Public Hearing Information Items 8.Planning Commission approval 6f June 18, 1984 minutes. 9.Planning Commission to select representative to attend the August 13, 1984, Council meeting. Adjournment TO: FROM: DATE: SOBJBC Zoninc Area - Applic The ap by a p] The ac west < wetlai propel portic drains struct west c septic suital the se site i Lot 1 I It wo interi line. Per Se have c Lot 2 \ contii acres Sectic acres Staff Stebb: and ol folloi 1. 2. f: a: UO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATS:July 11, 1984 SUBJECT: #839 Jeff Stebbins, 2195 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District - RR-lB Area ” 5 acre ~ dry contiguous land Application - Subdivision - Plat - 2 lots Lot 1^2 acres Lot 2 s 3 acres The applicant proposed the division of a vacant five acre tract divided by a private driveway easement that serves two residence to the south. The access to the property is via a 30 * wide platted driveway just to the west of the Almar addition just beyond 2175 Watertown Road. The wetlands survey maps do not designate wetlands within the subject property although a very defined ponding area is located in the western portion of Lot 2. This area should be designated on the plat as a drainage easement. It is staff's understanding that a principal structure will be located on the one acre portion of Lot 2 just to the west of the driveway overlooking the pond within the treed area. A septic system will be located on the east portion of the lot in more suitable soils for a septic system. The On Site Manager reports that the septic test data confirms adequate area and suitable soils for on site septic systems on both lots. Lot 1 must achieve access via a private access easement through Lot 2. It would probably run along the north property line from the intersection point at the 30* driveway along Lot 2*s north boundary line. Per Section 10.03 Subdiv 6(B) and Section 11.30 Subdiv 3, the City must have confirmation that the private driveway easements that intersect Lot 2 will not reduce the eastern portion of Lot 2 below the two acre dry continguous standard. Section 10.03 states the lot must contain two acres of contiguous land not divided by private access easements and Section 11.30 states the driveway easements must be excluded from the 3 acres building envelope. Staff recommendation to approve the two lot plat application of Jeff Stebbins based on the findings that all RR~1B zoning standards, septic and other pertinent ordinances have been satisfied subject to the following conditions: 1. Designate pond as drainage easements on the plat. City to require Flowage and Conservation Easement over pond area. 2. All structures and roads must meet 26* setback from pond. * ■r: liminary act divided the south, just to the Road• The :he subject the western s plat as a i p rincipal just to the id area • A lot in more aports that loils for on rough Lot 2. i £ r om the th boundary tie City must t intersect two acre dry contain two sements and !d f rom the 3 :ion of Jeff irds, septic ject to the y to require m pond. ■13 A ■ • •• •• ?.. i-: #839 Stebbins Page 2 3. 4. 5. payment of Par. Pee of 5400.00 (5200 per Xot). confirmation of area requirements for W Ml septic Unes to ^ insulated on tot another section divided oy a ‘vr-^ > - r 9f% M I N Iro in ?iSPS£ SgP" -4 in lij in <n cn _ o in > >- ^as3»sss^iisS 4*o o O B -iCM O o in B in CM UJ O Z 1 H H H “N < lU O B . m4 3 IM UJ O -> hr in* t o in o Ncd 2 ^ S2 -i4 *) M o zCM Ul •-« Q in o X X CM «i Ul B B X O glttoo9*P 5 B < Ul BL UJ CL Xl|5i CL UJ CL !<a o Z ^s Sp e m ^ o CM B m CM m in in •^5T o iu w z E &S:i‘‘l>.>•<4 Ul ;:a3 _____UJ m ^ CM H Ul *4 «• in in zO Ul CM o 5 lA S Ul M in Oe m ^ a CM B 3 in m CM ^ B UJ UJ UJ UJ B _ -'-'2 I in ^ O UJ ^ Bm in a asB" «0 e 2 S M o W O -I -i -< -j m4 oo in ^ o CM B UJo Ul m X ^ -JCM 5 < M I O O B ^ 1^ B B < Z «0 in o in B in UJ «i B sm Bo in X in ^ Q « UJ in ze «• r ^ o CO o < in Bm o n ^ CO o gB r o§is^ >• \ • “CL UJ B O ‘ B CL o o CM CM _ m B CM UJ I in o in B in •A a & ^ In -J -i in S UJ CM Q| ^ ^ ^ CM ^ CM O Ul UJ CM H UJ tinin m CM UJ UJ B Ul UJ Im in in o o in Q o ins ^d:i2 2 UJ gg "‘si M>inm inin m CM Ifv Ul UJ B ^•J -i z -j -I Z c Ul UJ 3 ^ O Im in in o o in a S3 s§«s -I «J CM O o § CL UJo zgl >• NUl CM CM UJ U. M I inin m CM IN I*3 ^ ^ in {0ssal UJ Ul CM -j CM MC CM -J 2 Ul M " a “ sH in tn X CM M I _ __ UJ u m X a 2 M UJ ^ M X > I B UJ m HO ^ UJ CM _ CM m O -j B CM CM «• O ^ CO CM O CM CM CM %o o in B in •n CM I N SfcS^ •J X UJ Ul I»n O CL ft -I -J in Q Ul UJ CM -J •fc* ^ Ul UJ.tn in o CO- S88^CO o UJ Ul in m O CD CD m CM I CO tnm in o in B m tn B ^ z S CM UJ -J < oUJ -J H ? IL Ul H o < CL B 3 Ul UJ tn in UJ ^ X UJ in i! b888sI -> CM -J O 9 CL Os B Q H \ UJ ri V * cl / ?■ 3 in in in ^ CM M • UJ S9 Ul in in gM H Hin Mg Z M M B UJ UJ CL H O H Sl Ul E u X M in N III si UJ “S 9« «. SS P -* «J z M S iu W O ZI K a (D H z BUl UJ I tn CM H -55 . 255S2 CM M M ^ O in in o HEI m in _ H in B ni I iCsin 7 2 Ul CM CM CM H O ilg| •-« B UJgs 25^, *’S99g!il m H Ul Ul _ If "8555' tn M H H H _ ^ X _ _ B u T 95< B oe z - m e lu **• M e M OT _ ClU w z - oe Z oglS9 CL Ul H N Ul o Z ^ <0 & • yjss r"s 3 I (OsI UJ ESaI s OL UJ X s iil UJH CM <0 » l/l lil lA Kl 7 10 CO yi ^r^ii!iX e uCM m<M O ____ O B B M « CM in in m 7 io CO UJ S!l t“! ^ B 10 ^ •n o u < HCM X 2 IB o «i u _ z MO M o qN o B B M ^ M O B O IS! in in ?S33e2 SSt33 i _ U U 10"tnliM N O «J -J ^ I IM kS g|«§321-^ CL UJ CL ii^ M in in in S»g3UJ UJ sm M 1 10 UJ UJ SSSSaig^ B B S X 2 X z 10 2 in M ^ ^ ui o 5 5 CM O UJ UJ CM UJ _*8S?3 9 3 in M m in I 10 o o i 111 h- 10 Ul MO O -1 ->-> in -J HUl UJ B in o in in M H o S P M I 10 u u 10 X CO UJ UJ •^4 3 UJ Ul 3 yj CO COCO M S Ul m -J ^ M 2 -J X M o N O 55-2 S5bS X sa 2 B g O Z Ul ^ < >- N ^ B < Ui & UJo Zsi I & s j- O CO !C LS UJ in m UJ UJ B SM XM -j UJ I O N U. CO Z H U. ^ M B UJ _ Ui Ul X I lu o «J ^ MO UJ ^ o X CO m -J mm B CO in m 3 M H I X CO UJ3 O inm tn M M UJ m M M >”-g-ss-l Ul Ul “S I M Oo ssil M M Ul ^ ss^cl B g Ul < >- N CL Ul a X FROM: DATE: SUBJECT : I have r Proposed and sand suitable The west seasonal by the d tested s drainfie critical Both lot approval & III § PROM; DATE: SUBJECT: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator July 10, 1984 Septic Testing Review - Jeff Stebbins* Subdivision on Watertown Road I have reviewed the test information submitted for this two-lot subdivision. Proposed Lot 1 on the eastern portion of the property contains loamy and sandy soils located on a western sloped hill. The tested sites are suitable for standard trench drainfield systems. The westerly lot (proposed Lot 2) contains lo2unn soils with a high seasonal water table at the tested sites. The house location preferred by the developer is west of the existing driveway in wet soils. The tested sites are located east of the driveway and will require a mound drainfield system at primary and alternate sites. Slopes are not a critical factor here. Both lots appear to have suitable drainfield sites. I would recommend approval of the proposal. :or Administrator (' Subdivision on two-lot subdivision, mtains loamy nested sites are Lth a high ration preferred : soils. The require a mound !S are not a ^ould recommend TO< FROM:Planning CommissionJeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:July Hr 1984 SUBJECTS #841 Craig Wintersr 888 Plentywood Road Preliminary Subdivision - 9 Unit PRD Zoning District * RR-IA Total Area = Dry ■ Wet 131.74 acres 58.82 acres 72.92 acres Total Number of Units Required Area Dry Area Average Pad size * 9 45 acres 58.82 acres 2.8 acres LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owner's List Septic Memo Original Lot Line Rearrangement Highway Department Letter City Engineer Cook Letter (3-12-84) MCWD Letter (3-5-84) Preliminary Plans The applicant has reapplied for a PRD subdivision in place of the The current proposal provides for a more efficient use of the dry buildable areas. K2VXEW - BACKGROUND ON LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PORTION OP APPLICATION (Insert from Zoning Administrator's memo of 3-14-84) "The purpose of the current subdivision is two fold. Firstr the original Plentywood plat (lot line rearrangement) approved in March, 1982 by the City was denied by the County because of unpaid taxes (back to 1981) on two of the parcels. I have been advised that all back have been paid. The applicant wishes once again to formalize the original subdivision of a lot line arrangement. Second, the applicant proposes the division of his homestead property of approximately 100 plus acres. ’.V t xi : J -.-A' y -ris V 1' ! u Brief E, Pa] that % rearr prope combi is Loi up th Septi All n; soils stand Each c has as these inhib desig: misha opera respo: alert' resol prope. We wi perti; PRD, repea- Ridge build. The n« appro' Plat ] The rc reside will b of the curve must b are a: Hennei be ded Road ( it PRD ice of the I meeting. :es for at bhe septic for PRD wetlands. )f the dry APPLICATION Firstr the ed in Harch, taxes (back L back taxes rmalize the econd, the troperty of I u1 % I !i 1 'f Briefly to review the original lot line rearrangement. Note Exhibit E# Parcels A, B, C and D were illegally divided off a 30 plus acre lot that was combined with the 70 plus acre lot to the north. The lot line rearrangement was to clear the title and tax records for all involved property owners. Each of the Outlets A and B (current plat) are to be combined with homestead lots. The Peters property in the current plat is Lot 1, Block 1. The remaining lots (residential and outlets) make up the actual Winters* holdings.” REVIEW OP THE 9 UNIT PRD SUBDIVISION Septic All nine residence pads have been tested and found to have adequate soils and satisfactory percs to allow either mounds or standard/shallow trench systems for primary and alternate sites. Each system must be at least 10 feet from the pad's lot line. Gaffron has asked that the septic area be defined in each of the pads to secure these sites because the condition of the soils and water table will inhibit the location of new suitable sites. I doubt whether the designation of septic test sites as outlets on each pad will prevent the mishaps that occur in the development of a property. The "cat operator rarely pays attention to outlets shown on a mylar. He will respond to physical/signage directives * The future homeowner can be alerted to the need to protect the septic test sites in the final resolution and in the private covenants that will govern the use of each property. We will discuss building setbacks in a later paragraph. If the pertinent zoning district standard for setbacks is not maintained in a PRD, the new setback is noted in an approving resolution and also repeated again in the private covenants for the property. Lafayette Ridge was an early PRD; all current ones reflect the innovative building envelopes. The need to stake the septic sites will be noted as a condition of approval. Plat Road The road will remain private serving nine residences. Access to each residence pad will be provided off the plat road. The private road will be subject to the performance standards set forth in Section 11.33 of the subdivision regulations. As before# Cook recommends that the curve at 5 + 00 have the radius length increased to 275 feet. The road must be paved—the plans propose merely a gravel road. The standards are as follows: 3” bituminous 8” base# class 5 gravel ditches 2* below centerline crown Hennepin County has reapproved the access location. Right of way will be dedicated based on the agreed upon 100 * right of way width for County Road 6. .mm The Eng drainage high wai Based o designai the east designai Minnehal The pro j Final gi applicai will pr< waterway and drai Perfonu The appl has a si< restrici setbacks street/i Pad 7 is for anim structui subdivis locatior arrange!! the 150' setback also rel requestc Additioi All impi trails# setback The plai involvir must be Rec To recom Craig Wii all stan> zoning d followin 1. e Exhibit ; acre lot s lot line involved are to be rent plat ots) make adequate >unds or be sites. Gaffron to secure able will sther the event the rhe "cat" He will ler can be the final se of each If the ained in a and also Lafayette nnovative dition of ss to each vate road :ion 11.33 5 that the The road standards f way will 'or County 0m y v . VC a ' t-'-iS iiy : ■ l-i The Engineer must confirm correct sizing of 24" CMP based on new drainage information. East side of culvert invert level at 961.0 with high water level at 962.0 and on west side 960 elevation. Based on the high water elevations, drainage easements must be designated on all areas below 960 elevation west of the plat road and on the east side of the plat road all areas below the 962 elevation to be designated with drainage easement. ^ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) The project must receive permit approval from the Watershed District. Final grading and drainage plans are to be submitted with the permit application. The plans must include erosion control measures which will prevent the washing of sediment into adjacent wetlands and waterways during grading and restoration period. The final grading and drainage plans must show a bench mark reference for elevations. Performance Standards for Plentywood Residence Pads The applicant has designated 100* street setbacks for all pads (pad 7 has a side 150* setback for the animal barn). The 100* setback is two restrictive limiting the building sit^a. I would recommend the same setbacks established for the Ski Tonka (Painter Creek) PRD with a 50* street/rear setback and 30* side setbacks. The building envelope of Pad 7 is severely limited by the 100* setback—note code says setback for animal barn must be 150* from all adjacent property lines not from structure. The barn is located within the shared commons area of the subdivision. A future home buyer will be fully aware pf its use and location. The owner/developer/seller assumes all risk with this arrangement. I would have no problem in recommending a variance to the 150* property line setback and recommend that Pad 7*s right or east setback line beat 50* fora total distance of 98* from barn. This will also relieve the restrictions on the building envelope for Pad 7 as requested by the On Site Manager. Additional Review Comments All improvements planned within commons area such as paths, horse trails, etc must be planned in consideration of the hardcover and setback requirements from wetlands. The plans show alterations within the designated wetlands area involving separate conditional use permit applications. Applicant must be advised. Recommendation of Preliminary Approval To recommend approval of the 9 unit PRD subdivision application of Craig Winters for the proposed development of Plentywood Farms finding all standards of the PRD ordinance, applicable standards of the RR-IA zoning district and septic ordinance have been upheld subject to the following conditions. 1. Access to all nine residence pads must be off plat road. ^ i y "S W If' f/2.Pads Pads left 3. sit< sub< 4. 5. 6. 7. to » eas ove 8. dra 9. mus 10. One One 11. wet all mai the sed on new 961.0 with1. s must be road and on ition to be District, the permit ures which :lands and al grading Levations. >ads (pad 7 sack is two id the same with a 50* nvelope of ys setback is not from irea of the .ts use and with this ariance to ght or east This will >r Pad 7 as thsr horse dcover and Lands area Applicant ication of :ms finding I the RR>1A )ect to the lat road. 1 S- Page 4 I*;; •1 f)>;.[ 2. The approved building envelope for each pad is as follows: PadI 7^-Vront/rear ftTo^’^right^lstkde yard setback at 30 * and left/east side yard must be 50*. 3. All drainf ield areas must be staked and protected prior to any site grading or road construction - Final resolution approving subdivision must advise of need to protect septic test areas. 4. Dedication of right of way for County Road 6. 5. Underlying road and utility easement over road outlot. 6. Revise road plans per Engineer’s report of March 12, 1984. 7. Designate drainage easements over areas below 960 elevation to west of plat road and over all areas below 962 elevation to the east of plat road—Conservation and Flowage easement to be taken over all areas designated as drainage easements. 8. Apply for permit approval from MCWD final grading and drainage plan must show bench mark reference for elevations. 9. Outlot A must be combined with Hagfors property. Outlot B must be combined with Gehrman property. 10. Payment of Park Fee of $800.00. One unit § 5 acre density * $100.00 One pad contains existing house. 11. Applicant placed on notice that alteration of a designated wetland will require a separate conditional use permit and that all improvements involving hardcover within commons area must maintain 26* setback from wetlands—Applicant should advise if be a need to address variances with this review. V-y-y : ; ■ V • , V: ■ . - 4 June 27, 1984 Mr. Gene Ernst Ernst Associates 122 West 6th Street Chaska, MN 55318 Dear Mr. Ernst: Subdivision 8 lots 8 $20 p le ‘*'^41 CITY of ORONO Po«t Office Bo* 66«Ciyet«l Bay, Minneeota 65323•Municipal Officea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka so The following fees must be submitted for the nine unit PRD Plentywood (#841) in order to complete the filing of the preliminary application: Application #818 - 8 lot plat $240.00 160.00 $400.00 Septic 7 lots e $30 210.00 Total $610.00 Staff Review of Application #818: A) 2 hours preliminary plan review + memo = B) 2 hours septic review + memo * C) Public Hearing ® Credit $30.00 30.00 20.00 $80.00 $530.00 Private Road Fee and Total Credit $1,017.50 ($100.00 minimum + .50 per .2,035 lineal feet) Total Credit $1,547.50 Application #841 Fees per 1984 fee schedule (effective 3/84): Subdivision PRD 9 units 8 $25 Septic Review 8 units 8 $30 $240.00 225.00 240.00 $705.00 Road Fee $1,300.00 (minimum $300.00 + .50 per 2,000 lineal feet) Total Credit Amount Due $2,005.00 1>547.50 $ 457.50 BUILUINO A ZONING - 473-7357 assessing ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Mr. Pagi Jun< You Mon Pie Sin 'N Je^ Zon le ORONO l»5323 • Municipal Offices Mr. Gene Ernst Page 2 June 27, 1984 /.V : «jf Your PRD subdivision application is scheduled for a public hearing on Monday, July 16, 1984, at 8:00 p.m. Please call ine if you have any questions. Sincerely, TearineJeaiine A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator pc; Craig Winters ■ ^ • N. v'V- ■'M ' V. ' ^ m ¥■ •■- ^ If.w t?’ 'f-T < 1mmI ).S6-tjr.U E*^- ■ •'fe'v ■> m.‘ a ^ r ff ... • * .* .» V -• v.-rw■' '-t’ Rf f" • Ui¥- i' public hearing on ml' • MV : M to 3 e I i "5:to lA o M n S -II M SE -i I ^ M i CM CUo c ^‘E C 01o o VD in CO in in Id c z f o • CO i- • z fO OJ Z CO CM I CO < •* 01 CO oS ^ 4-^ Id 4-> 4-> m -J 1. S. I 01 01 o o> O O CO o cc 00 CO «/) 1.c s »o ^ DC 0^1 H o ^ SSf s» l“5S _xS CO in CO in in CM o to Sf CM XJ. ^SS III o X a < m u CO CM I 00 I CM HI 7 tt Kl O X E O Is < K O S» Io CO 3 i/> 1. • 01 C-> 4->c 01 -r- 4-> 3 4-> 01 01 C 4-> Id 4-1 O 01 O Z 4-> 01 C ^ 01 Id oQ Id CD •O n ni^-J 00 CO C7I 0)0. CD Id Id 00 c S. S- 00 o U O 00 ^ CL a oo ^ M liJ lU H lU 3^ H M Ul K M X V"guUl u. u. M a o o lo a 01 c c in 4-1 C/>ta <o 01 s- tnoa. 01 in rs C u lO o 4-4 CO r—JC JZI in • 01 in O V 01 CO to CL in O O C3 in CM •• in 2 ^ 2 >> >)Z CM c c zox to a a o oO FI Ul -J m a i. • z L. a • • CM > < S CO 01 01 0) z Id Id c z CM < K ^ ^CM h- h- >CO XZ jC 01 z 1 < •»CM OO oo •> CM X X Ul X 00 Od uQ 01 1 < • • X o M > r 00 ud ud 0) CO M ID r <• • 4-1 Id p—Z .X^ CO a X Ul ^ ^ 9 1 CX ex lO «J f—4-t 4J 4-1 Id to O P X ^ X o C9 n lu ^ S CD 90 -I O^ o o a CD to «J 00 CO COO) Z CM O CM o C CO ^ 00 CO 44 a o o o c CO o ss Ul 01E Id §11 a CL 01 s§ 1. lO 01 *0 <0 U 13 IQ as Of T3 X E <o <o t- «0 Cu 01 o. Of O c K E t> 3: <o «o a. o H- as y !• > i J TO: FROM; DATE: SUBJECT; I have r< the prev; The PRD system s able) be For the the most PRD-1 - PRD-2 - PRD-3 - PRD-4 - PRD-5 - PRD-8 PRD-9 c TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator p. July 10, 1984 Winters - Plentywood PRD Septic Testing Review - Craig I have reviewed the additional “rrenf PRD"a||uca^ion. able) berng usaoxe fh^ JSlti^elenl A^^iei review oi the septic test results: "tfl© luOSV iwww tr • Ts tll0 . »,„a. *“■ 100 * set- create a maior xxmx».»w*— — a this case pp,., - -unds regu^ sites, tne xuw _ — ■ ^ j av^T^T^ovftd tortaken as pa-t ^ ^ _ alternate site previously tested and approved f PRD-4 - Existing house - alternate si a mound system.a mounu 4sites Mrohsis;., PRD-6 - Same comments as for PRD-5. PRD-7 - ssinie — primary site - mound system; a^^®’^"“,®^®iine'severely limit the setback -LrS i°pro“lem“- coul^ the setbacks possible house locations and may oe p ^ relaxed in this case? PRD-8 -^prltllf iuLnatf sitl'fri; d???eway‘1ncroa?J^nt':°“" ’ PRD-9 -rprltelfinrti?es‘1rom"driv^^^^^ ' ^ Septib Tes July 10, ] Page 2 I have rec layout dat suggested Once t should appro\ water/ Where field Lot 7) Will 1- (To a\ A numh must 1 I iD IVdmini str ator - plentywood PRD ted along with it PRD application I a septic iround (dry build- )f at the boundaries. hrough PRD-9 as per test results: Is the 100' set- ick does create :es. In this case linfield sites. >und. The proposed Ltes. I suggest »ction measures snd of this report) I and approved for alternate sites. 0 place drainfield 1 aware of locations illow trenches, jrely limit the could the setbacks ) place house, but need >achment . ntion must be given ncroachments. Septib Testing July 10, 1984 Page 2 - Craig Winters I have requested that the site evaluator submit additional design and layout data for all the mound systems. The following guidelines are suggested for this PRD project: Once the mound layouts are known, a specific "drainfield envelope” should be designated on each PRD lot. In most cases, the tested and approved sites will not be capable of being relocated due to site/soil/ water/topographic conditions!!! Where 100* setbacks would force houses to encroach on designated drain field sites, the setbacks must be relaxed. (Important on Lot 1 and Lot 7) Will house setbacks be specifically designated in the resolution? (To avoid the type of confusion we had on Lafayette Ridge) A number of sites are located very near the proposed roadway. Developer must fence off the designated drainfield sites so that construction of the roadway does not disturb them especially on Lots 2, 7, 8 & 9. il design and .delines are Leld envelope" the tested and 1 due to site/soil/ 1 designated drain it on Lot 1 and i resolution? lidge) roadway. Developer It construction of 5 2, 7, 8 & 9. Ms. Jea Zoning City of P. 0. E Crystal Dear Ms Prc CS/ Sec Her Rev Minnesc propose acceptc -The Henr thi; o ^ ■' #•' ■; • HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Z %t 935-3381 March 5, 1984 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Proposed Plat - "Plentywood Farm” CSAH 6 Directly Opposite Orchard Park Road Section 30 and 31, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 1171 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found It acceptable with consideration of these conditions: -The right of way shown, 50 feet from the center of CSAH 6, Is acceptable to Hennepin County. No additional right of way required by Hennepin County at this time In the area of this plat. -The location of the proposej^ubllc streeyls acceptable to Hennepin County. 'Any new access to a county road or a revision to an existing access requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. See our Maintenance Division for entrance permit forms. 'All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This Includes, but Is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. -The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Welgelt. y^ncerely. ames M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Programming JMW/LDW:jfe n©[inw[§i CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer r •*' iIS. V V... . ■ • . •. 2SS5 W. Jti St. p»td, Miitmaulm i March 12 City of Box 66 Crystal Attn: Ms Re: File Pier Dear Jea We have tion« 1 The strc inches < the cent sizing. W< If you 1 Yours V' BONESTR Glenn R GRC:li 9762b - - . ■ .r . p County review of ; and found it acceptable to ipin County at Bnnepin County. iccess requires ince Division for an approved s, but is not ent, and forms. ction within -7661 )F ORQNO lUNTY tloyer mi 1 l.'1 L Jr • jSoH€iUoa, AndmfiUh A /tuaeiaiel, 9iQ%0uJUu*^ Ctt9i0tmU MC. 2S35 W. *1^ JtifMmaf 36 St. p«a4 MimmauU S5113 PUmi 6f2’636‘3600 Oho G. Bootttroo, P.£. Kobtrt W. Konne, P.C- Joseph C. AoderUk, P.E. Bfotford A. Lemberg, P.E. PkbordE. Turner. P.E. Jomet C. OtHM. P E. March 12, 1984 C4fft«i K. Cvokg P.E,Kfitk A. Cofdom, P.E, Thomm E. NoytSo P-B- Pkhsr^ W. PoiNTo P.E. Robert C. Sebmokbt. P.E Morviti L. SoTfOk, P.E. Doooid C. Bttfioeit, P.E Jerry A. IomtAm, P.E. Hork A. Homsom, P.E. TedK. Md. P.E Mkkoei T. Rootmonno PE. Robert R. PMferk, P.E Dovid LoikotOo P.E. CborksA. Erkksom Leo M. Peweisky Horkm M. Oboo City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn* 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-818 Plentywood Farm Addition Dear Jeanne, We have made a review of the preliminary plat on the J^®"^ywood Fara Addi tion. The curve at 5+00 should have the radius length increased to 275 feet. The street section should consist of 8” of Class 5 gravel base and inches of bituminous surfacing. The ditches should be a minimum of 2 below the centerline crown and a drainage plan should be provided along with culve sizing. ■ luin f 1nf_ 1 r.H-mr-nrt rn, Q11 ftW * d If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li 9762b MIMIMEIWATER! P.O. Box 387, Way ■OMO or IMNMCm: Divid H. Cochran, Prat. « Alba March 5 Ms. Jea City of PO Box Crystal Re: Pr Pr Dear Ms As requ above p permit final g include adjacen CHrmn M. Otut, P.C- KtM A. Co/Am, P.e. nomm £. fhftt, P.C.AktmA W, fttttr, P.E. Aobtrt C. Stkmkhl. P.C. UmrriK L. SomA i. f.£. DohM C. tmttrAl, P.B. Jtrry A. Btr uAt*. P-B. Mart A. Hmum, P.B. niK. FIM. P.B. MkkaA T. Pmamam, P.B. Pobtrt K. PftO*^‘ B.B. DavU iMtata. P.B. OmHuA. BrtHaaa Uo M. Pawibky HartmM. Oton I Addi- 275 feet. :hree 2* below Lth culvert MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ■OMO or MMMKRS: H. Cochnn, Prtt. • Albtyt L Ithmin • John E. Ttiofint • Micliifl R. CarroU • CamiMt D. Awdrt UKI MimiCfOIIM March 5, 1984 / ! Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 I: j : n: n^TTf^ , r . . ■ I I r . » ! I i /f I Re: Preliminary Plat of Plentywood Farm - #818 Preliminary Plat of Painters Creek - #804 iij^ ^-6/994 Dear Ms. Mabusth: As requested In your letter dated February 27, 1984, we have reviewed the above preliminary plats and have concluded that the projects will require permit approval from the District. The owners should file for permit when final grading and drainage plans are available. These plans should also Include erosion control measures which will prevent sediment transport Into adjacent wetlands and waterways during the grading and restoration period. In addition. District staff offers the following comments: Plentywood Farm - #818 1.Outlots A, B, D and E Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 The final plat should show drainage easements for low areas on these parcels below elevation 960. 2.Outlot F Lot 2, Block 2 Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 The owner should determine the high water level for these parcels in view of the proposed 24“ CMP and show drainage easements In the final plat. 3.The final grading and drainage plan should show a bench mark reference for elevation. Ms.' Jeanne Page Two March 5, li Painters Ci 1. Outlo The O' B be I final The p for ^ The f for € Both of tlr Since Impi watershed concerned are review Thank you planning. 473-4224. Very trul EUGENE A. Engineers Michael / cc: Boai G« I Sim ■''//, ■if ■ f QMfo Bd the squire it when also ort into period. these els in view a1 plat. eference mu ■ ■ • ^ \f .f v' Ms.* Jeanne A. MabusthPage Two March 5, 1984 Pain ters Creek - If804 i. Z, 3. Outlet B ?be “r'thr°lSJ'yfaJ®’i^iel fhould’SelSown ’trJage K"n/on°fhe “' final plat. The proposed street and cul-de-sac should drain to Outlot B. If possible, for water quality considerations. The final grading and drainage plan should show a benchmark reference for elevation. Both Of the proposed developments are within the^Pam^^ Since improvements have been ordered to Manaoers will be primarily rre^d SnS ra?:^grairtrcrrdejrt1^s at the tiSe permit applications are reviewed. ;irnnirg“ '“s^oSlJ^ySrhm inj 5SenU“.*p1«srcJ"uct’"ste!;e mVX ft 473-4224. Very truly yours, tUGENE A. HIGKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District •/ A " Board G. Macomber • ITOFROM:DATE: SUBJEC Zoninc Area - Di Appli< LIST 4 Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhifa Exhib The a of Cc Kings pads contc cont< pads sf. appl; deve rura sepa drai assu prob gran pad* resp n of Outlet mt on the if possible. eference itershed. ■ from the i primarily ^plications arly stages of lller or me at ,V> ■V V-. N I • • TO:Planning ConunissionFROM:DATE: SUBJECT: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning AdministratorJuly 13, 1984 «840 Ned Dayton, 2300 North Shore Drive Subdivision - Preliminary Zonin9 District — RR~1B '"'“D;y®-'40rnres (survey information does not designate dry Application -Subdivision - PRD of 17 units Required Area - 34 dry acres Existing Dry - 40+ acres LIST OP EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Property Owners List Plat Map ^ ^ .Development Plan of French Creek Preliminary Plat Grading and Drainage Plans Road Plans Landscape Plan .relic... reore~, • Si pads containing house and -tc. Each pad must containing pathways# tennis cour # 9 Arainfield sites# The contain adequate area to -t"av«age lo^^^^^ pads are all under 2 acres except for iminarv review of the fif It will be most important during the¥ey assure that all improvements associated with rural application to assure tnar restrictive setbacks that accompany fu^:r^Te\o-me^\^^Vr? ®ach^pad._^ (Bx. ItllTilll a‘;rd''retenUon%"d °r drainageways) assure that the ?hSt"“0^0 Coun^ problems for a ^ a total plan be drawn including eachssn\"4;KS.°ii\h .‘ireSr ksU c ,1.. .,n.ji.. ?^8plctive address file for the use of a future owner. "i’ in ji ' I Valid!Staff 1 and ad\ of the of tre< formal featur Review In re\ unfort house other. total ] 35* - 4 Septic Gaffro period a smal mark mi 1 and : trench drainf separa writte reassu the pa Plat B The PI will b have : inforn We wil provic an add Both i Preliminary signate dry gnate wetlands >n the north side iously owned by on of 17 building ed commons area Each pad must Leld sites. The ot size is 67 r 300 ry review of the Lated with rural B that accompany each pad. (Ex. separation from nember we have to eld won’t create prior to Council wn including each 1 be placed in its wner. '1 [ 5 Validity of PRD ApplicationStaff reviewed the PRD alternative of development with the applicant and advised of the need to present a physical feature or characteristic of the land that would require the clustering of homes. The location of trees and French Lake suggested the best building locations. A formal plat would make less efficient use of the aesthetic and unique features of the property. Review of Performance Standards for Residence Pads In review of the many plans presented with this review, some, unfortunately, presented in different scales, it appears that all house and septic drainfields meet the required setbacks from each other. To complete the review, well locations must be designated on a total plan. As for setbacks for a building envelope, I would suggest 35* - 40* front/street and rear setbacks, and 15* - 20* side setbacks. Septic Gaf f ron has worked closely with the On Site Evaluator through the test period. The majority of soils are suitable for standard systems with a small number of pads to be served by mound systems. The high water mark must be determined for all retention areas (Pads 6, 8, and 9, Block 1 and Pads 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 2). The bottom of all drainfield trenches must be 3 feet above the high water elevation. All drainfields must roiintain distance of 75* from all well locations, 20* separation ftom house and 10* from all lot lines. Gaff ron has not written a formal review on the septic report but has no problem in reassuring Planning Commission that there will be no need to rearrange the pad lines as proposed for this review. Plat Road The Plat road should be designated on the plat as an outlot. The road will be private and must conform to all standards of Section 11.33. I have reviewed the plans with the City Engineer. The following information will be required: A) Typical Section bed of 8" class 5 gravel 3** bituminous surface 50* right of way 28* minimum paved width ditches 2* below centerline crown B) Horizontal and Vertical Control design speed 30 MPH 12% maximum gradient 275* minimum radius We will recommend that the banks along County Road 51 be trimmed back to provide adequate sight distance. The County advises they will ask for an additional 7' of right of way for a total right of way width of 80*. Both access locations are approved with adequate sight distance. . Page 3 #840 Dayton crystal Bay Roadsf *^The PubUcITor'k/coo^^^ r ***"^^^"9not find a public need to orotit^ Coordxnator and City Engineer do roads in the Crystal tov because of adequate loop consideration of the s^etv fl^i^' °°‘’ plat. In county roads than in nlighterhood‘‘road‘*s°"®® Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) “%^'prlJLwrrltltJ’^of th?''^ ««<^«*^»>sed district, advises that 1^11^three retention Plans, the Watershed 2s:i?.'.?.;K.iv/Ar ^“r"“ i-F.ho.W b. ,b». p5it%%*VrfxX .v.zr “.'."“' ^^itional Review Coterents d^Sin^gf „?th“in ^h^'propTrSy wTl? 1Se""e ‘x/s"t runs west from Briar Street throuohontiot =1- drainageway that remain untouched in its nature P°"'^ *’*<1 ® tennis court will te placed ill the a.I appear a future This is an important d?aiSagetay slrWclL f l n drainagway. the Crystal Ly neiohborhoS ^rt 7 “"® watershed within drainage plan if this area is to drained intcTthe^et*^*’® grading and between Pads 6 and 7. 4 and 5 anH i storm sewer shown computations for proposed storm sewf»r\-rk ® <3esign leaving the property under full devtfiirtrMii assure that surface water on undeveloped property DrWnaflo^f ^ remains the same as it is as retention ponds^ designated wetlandslnT7« ® be taken over allwidth). ^ etlands and drainageways (minimum of 15* L'v:iS^enlrfVi!edToVot ‘e%‘^^^^^ the^!ant“ -trol ^^"1nlirrora"trd\rtSn?a^^^^^ findingTll^standard^^ application of Ned Dayton the RR-lB zoning district and*^ "“"“i •***l’^tcable standards of subject to the folloting'lonSuron^, ordinance have been upheld Access to all 17 residence pads must be off plat road. 2. The approved building envelope for each pad is as follows: front/street or rear « side « Page #840 bhe abutting Engineer do ^equate loop it plat. In e better off id district, i Watershed ater levels Low the high elevations bhe surface geway that >nd in Pad 8 r a future rainagway. ihed within rading and ewer shown lire design face water as it is as n over all .mum of 15' ins but the the plans, he grading Ned Dayton andards of len upheld Id. >llows: r'% ;• • i-;a \ vi* ) Ff ; A k- m.'‘•’r Page 4 #840 Ned Dayton Prior to scheduling application for Council approval# the developer must provide a total development plan that shows the following: A) House locations B) Drainfield locations C) Well locations D) Driveway locations All drainfield areas must be staked and protected prior to any site grading or road construction. Final resolution approving plat will specify need to protect drainfield locations. 5. Dedication of 40* of right of way to County for County Road 51. 6. Underlying road and utility easements over road outlot. 7. Road plans must include the following: A) Typical section B) Horizontal and Vertal controls 8. Submit Drainage data as follows: A) Design computations for storm sewer B) High water elevations of retention ponds C) Signify what areas are to be served by storm sewer D) How shall the water be carried—CMP or open ditches 9. Drainage easements taken over wetlands# retention ponds# drainageways. 10. Apply for permit approval from the MCWD*-'>final grading and drainage plans must show bench mark reference for elevations and erosion control measures. 11. Payment of Park Fee of $3#400.00 1 unit 6 $200 per 2 acre density 12. Approval of landscape plan dated June 26# 1984 (File 8420# 1 of 1) "1! GENERAL LA PROPERTY L Site A Proper Please (for C Please survey APPLICANT Name Mailin' OWNER Name ^ Mailint Date P] I FEES - Cone Other ApplJ * j % rovalr the : shows the to any site roving plat by Road 51. riot. f/er ;hes ponds, grading and vations and I420r 1 of 1) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address OWNER Name CITY OP ORONO % 'GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION #840 AJmtA 1 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one — Is the property t frsir ^ 4- 4 1 «_ _^ •_ _^ •_(for Conditional Use Applications only) abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on reauired survey. APPLICANT Phone A~[ - ~^600 Mailing Address p. e>T. <V\h ^\eA (Oeei_Phone Mailing Address ST- / tUVZATA, kXu. I Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do not) adM own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - Conditional Use Permits $50.00 a) Residential Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling) $150.00 e) Commercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule (over) ■.-I* I Ikl ..>r : ! ■ X. m PRESENT USE Present Present DESCRIPTION De&crlb required si 1, Coroplel 2. Certif: f r om He 3. Stamper above 4. Certif 5. Constr 6. Plat M The Applic that your included. APPLICANT* The applic the Zoning in review c and corre( applicant OHHERS SI< The owner authorize: agents, a and verif Owner's s Applicant Planning( Monday of r.4 0 torrens? tided on required 00 OO JM22SW P OROXO r:.4 # 4 i. • > J i -.V ;>•' ) fi M /■I :•!■. .■■•■ I?. ^■• ■• .r*; PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property -Residential Other (specify) description op REQUEST Describe request iq Yrr limidAfv^ a^^ required SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 * (you ®an obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348 3 ) 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable 6. Plat Map. included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE and correct to the best df iiisPher klloHled^e. ^Applicant's signature M k * OWNERS SIGNATURE Date 6/2Z>/^^ The owner hereby aclcnowledges and agrees to authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City . . . . ^ agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigat and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date 6>/ls/r¥ Appilcant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the thir Monday of each month. _ 00 G^ >% 1—4 O obtain this list !!enter 348-3271) E the names on the Please remember ion has not been ‘d or requested by Bxpenses incurred n supplied is true >ate tion and further iff, consultants, I of investigation 5 days before the :e held on the third i V 1' 'S.- E.' m.Ill mm m 00 0% f—I r> >1 o "n(r^ )7 44 44 ITS 4Jcn 0)u 0) a e •H •H U Cooo >1 •Hu •TOc OS uo >1 ITS S! (A U 0)co •H 0) (0 •Heeou O' OS c rH *r4 iO c ITS C U ITS O »H C 04o ocou o CT (N CO u*' lA vO 44 O >1 • 4.' O •M • u O4 oco )4 o 1-^ ' CD 0) S4 U oc<D Vi O4 44 U 0) •r^ D 07 C 0)c 1-4 44 C •1) CO •T3 C OS (A c rn •O •H JO ‘HI 4J P U (A Id 4J Id *0 S4 0) O4 D 4J (A Vl C O O 44 •H (A Coo M D O 4J ITS V4 0) •O •H (A • C Q 0) CP Id 44 (A c •H :3o >% o u cc •o •H Id c Id • r-4 ^ 0# rH •H >1 9 U Idc •H B •H ID •H > Q> (A CP C H » Id V4 V4 M •O D Oi M fH 0) O C T3 C Id >4o 44 Id 4J 4J 4i •H E JQ D (A Id TO a*3: o« •D >1 0) 44 (A Id O C ^ •H O E C •H rH 0) 0) S4 £ 04 44 4i Uo•m O U O4 U 2 l-i > fH 0) >4 0)uc •Hcn CDws H (A C/) < 0; H <ca mwiiiliirii 1'' "'i jj „ -'■'S*: ' ____ v.ai .■ ‘1^ r f «.» ;7 • ! t' r H'-.. V- 01 sxuc 01u U4 M4 o x: 4J p 0 01 I in •H O 7: TJ « OU IM O 4J (0 0) I •H in • 5s •c •O 0 OS •Hc4J 0 •a •H o •HuUm0CJ44CO Q 0 OS Q JCos4J OS M 4-S •H 0 •r4 03 z CO ro CJ 0)o»cmos r^ r-l iH cu •Hx:cnc o o •H a 0) O) O) •oc 01 o 0> O) CO(n 0)ir 4>i M-1 O 4J V4 I?0< C 4J O OS •H citu (U CO >t OSu c O -H 'O s C *H D !-• 01 0) (0D v< U4 •H OS •H 4J C 01•u •H (0 01 V4 4J CO Q)ocro> c OSu 03 •*-« 0> «H U 04 fQ OS a (0 03 ^ E-i >1 •H •H • E 0) <C O C OS OS c • ^ -H iH O' 03 OScVi> •H O 0(0 V4cnou S4 c a 0 •H <0 44 c A TS s w o OS • CO o ooQc• a o a 0 ViuO > Of u OS 03 (0 •C Cc•H 4J •fJ 0 s •H OS 44 •H 4J 4J 0 #-4 OS *H OS U CO O u •H O a rH CO COa•H •TSajCo <m m m■..Vv 'r‘‘'r>w- • •»»; '•» + r A ;im ' i ■;>;v ^>0'!;;;^ f mmMm ■ ' i-:Wmm -■ A-'nv"-wA 'r:i; !• .• • • •' . ..- t .• •. liil::ii «iia **1 •h Applicant and OwnerNed Dayton315 E. Lake StreetVJayzata, MN 55391 Prepared By: R. Bastyr and Associates, Inc. 738 Twelve Oaks Center 15500 Wayzata, MN 55391 1'' li • •:••!'■'•' i' ■ "f-- 'y ” "'.'.H'‘. •■ • - ■:'• ^: -vryv •.'• .a.’- * •’ :• " y'ymmy^ : ^ ^ . V/ ■ * *;0/;>.:..' PryppPm \ V •' • ;:iA5 /'rW wpmmimmi ypPmPP. ■ppp:Prjpy~yp - y- ppyyypp/pp:p pyymPP:^^^^mmm^^pppp<":p'- mmmmM mm msam^^yy-- -mm mamkteisaAsisfe Ir ' \ .^:Pp-.i:P-%::P .•»^. rv;;!,r-.^; a-'-^ A.; vP;V:VPV- pPi^P^ypppppPmmypp -"pyp'y^^^ •■ -n' • *•• PP^^PJL M ^PM mm pmipm0.- P-- “Vi: lipMm pppppppp .•:pvP;- a;-.^mmmmsmrn Design Proposal- Designed to acl'- Natural charact- Lots are desigrLots were chose Topography, tAttention to dc character.- Site will be er Substantial Additional % Entrance enh Additional f Encourage ca ** Public blacktop - Drainfields are ;r.« wSm^mMPPPm:jPi : ^'.r PpSP'Wi i ymmmm ... .;i. . ;s.; .. ... P. ;•>•<■ :-l> w:':mm^PPp* ■ •- ■•: mm Pi.. :. • • - • *• •. r: .■ . ^pppMm i- .r.4.U;? vS.V..::>-^;v;;.,:iii-:i; • ••■■.V.-I ■.••:.•■. ■-.'v./'-O;:^:., ■•.■ ■ ::mS:!«S5 Design Proposal- Designed to achieve exclusive executive home sitesNatural character to be preserved by careful placement of homesites and streets.- Lots are designed recognizing site trees and topography.Lots were chosen and designed in field to preserve a privacy between homes. Topography, trees, etc.Attention to detail will allow preservation of the site esthetics and natural character.- Site will be enhanced as well to provide additional amenities.Substantial bermingAdditional plantingEntrance enhancements Additional ponding area and character Encourage careful house placement - Public blacktop streets will enhance desirability. - Drainfields are designed and tested. mmgmm ;a4filaiSMa:?;:: ■:: a. Jaa;,a a :ai'SiwI :Mmrnkim^KWliM ^aa.f-a-a^^vva S^a'S^K/a'a;^;?.-;;' a;va,::iaa-,?aa,^:?a ..0 -u -ili a ; ■ aa ’■-aKS;a a; vt‘a;aH: a ■:^5>-a'immimmsmM wmimm •... • :' .* *.•' ;..a ■m.k. •a..-mm sess « ^-a- Va-a;-; "-a--^-.-U;.a i;. '■n-wv;; 'a-.; a;- mmmm.,,.,aas/a’?;oar:C'aa;a--aia;a;;? Ka.S,;;.HSa:a:;aa:aa/a.?,.^^ k.a:aa o • .:■• ■ . f '.-^ «■. ■:V* /'• :MiWSiPSili ............................................................. .aaaa aaat:^-, :av:-;a aa ::a. a;a ; a^ ; a ,;aaa; a-^v;.3v'>.:aa,y yy: y aa^yay-ay .yV; y y:y,;;;yA:;^a^ a^yyy iyia ^ayaaa^yy.a a^a y;y.y . y;.^ ■ •:.>; 1- a'-. . * • ■ ■’’ ■■'■'' •••“ ■“■ •■ ■ ' ■■-.•• .Jr • a..^ Kasyv^wim wm^sm i¥ft'a?j.-aa;^ I'--. eVa 'yy: llM ;?-'a:aMa;a^':a®¥:«.-•a-aa-,., a ; a: , !y : - a ; ,:• •:;^v ,..• -,^: :;.r\aaa. ,v a.-;.-.-• /y'-:'■ - , ■•; - ; ,:V ■ a. v ■• y.a-.,' r-..-■•.••a ••!:•..•. ■ :•■ ..y.a.j-. •■..•■.■wmrnk -.1..». .•;. , y ■■■.. > •■ s- a:::a='-;a"y>a: : v y ,yyiy:-:. my: Site Kaaa streets.mes.atural mMmmMmmm ■ _ .V• 1: . . •:•...Biimm m % mm: teft's-f ?mmm:Siv ar s: ^ :^v:^v*.•■^’ >/.-• ■:.-T%-J*'1-1 *•■•-■•:•: ■ -i-f#*'.^r Vr site StatisticsExistingTot3l Site AreaExisting Zoning 50.9 Acres RR - 1 BProposedZoning - P.R.DTotal Number of Lots - 17Minimum Lot Size - 52,500 Sq. FtMinimum Lot Width - 150 FeetAverage Lot Size - (Excluding Outlets) 67,300 Sq. Ft. Average Lot Size ~ (Including Outlets) 120,424 Sq. Ft. :___ ilil^ 4r---S.i ?^-'v - V 'V,:. m'um " ■'/.•;•;.••^:. v’ '/ -v.'^ 11 )A'y- ?;^v: ••'. .• r'.‘;.’ ^ •:•'•■'w;.* ^ . N- -V'V '■'. m:':m :..rm y#..-vi!b-r ■:c ■ '■■;'.• ■=• ,1 .y^S.;'fl'SvAf y/u,;;W:::k '■■ ■■'}.■.i '• :v'; ■ ■■'.:;y;^ -v-;- V-;\/'----'-V.^,‘r;\: ••■:-v--:y-/.v .’v.: :V.-V:v:. . •••■ • /;• ■:;v ••••; v • ;;:=...,vv -:. ■;: v.; : ;v{v;; --. .. y . . .... V, V ■■• mm wmBpsm \-...=• : :sm§ •,.-my^:.--'. A:-v; A ■■hk- - ' '■ l- .y;.-\ v v.V- ••■' • A v: • ^ A:A A-;.-:^-... .•' MlM^HBBi;:ysyy: SH3K*il«:;SA^^ W - :Aa-.AA v.A"A •' ■■:.' ■■ ■ Va. ■.■•.••••••-•••; V AA ■ A.-v ‘--y :;A A A ^JpAISiAy-'»;y jSssss^feisyffiaSE^ ;Av-;; ■••vA wmmmkm&mm i: :■ ■ •■•AvV- :> A a: r-;.,f..vA;AA^A;.:AA;AAA- •' A ••-A’A''i; • ■'. > \A:A- ■'"■ •■• AA\- y ..... : ■ ,.T. y-... ., . A-:'"'---"- :a ■ -A - - yv:. --■ *4 •■ .y's- :. ■ ■ ■ .A I’"- .1"; ' i Ai'' •• • ■/«’ ' ^' • . AA'. ■> ^mm ‘^kkrkkfmkvi : a. .'i;- ..■m A- 'y^rv-^ •'31 ■/-'airv;':.' mmmmmmmm^^^pii a jM. i . S M&.v-'l'*’ yii- ' A'y--ya ■’: ;;.i ■ vs;.•.;’! .. '•..** ‘;i ; ; ■ >• ’♦•••:!’ J.. - ' '• - A..'*.' •. '■i r- ■ '-A a:- aa md u•11 •.AA r r i.v'r fc‘.' s«ss|HI s Si 3M s:s octu is V &s ;S CMCM V HICMI |8*8IItf HI yj ui1^23 «0 O O UI “8 , SS § HI X . a CM K X CI Qc UI 9! 8 o r§: S e CD - o o c HI CM I X: UI I 3! (D I I UI * g S 2 UI>r UI I - 3 X OL UI II y*- •• • ^ . i(i‘ x5;i Rii* [Tv'■ -v ;.*.[;.•■•* .{■■■■■:%•■•■-i.yv-' mimmsxmm i- ■ "'I '■'il 3«#§|sd:?a5:« iSfWPKAa* lit T'lir'"...... •.* ..1 • ••'■ I •.• •' . ■ ^'j . ^imfw a#afe ' ij^ 4 s.aa s| i liloe ^XUIJ HI M I o Sill “giS, 8!lU wtti III g3S_ 25S8 S e lu ®8 « 8 Ul r lu ^UJ K 2o o m S^zSSS S1S-.5, T S»SS^ ^ M z _ e o tfl «i « M . . Xm e u u CM 8 S2^5!9 O O M i^S88 HI :h: _ r III M III Ul ^ »s M:_ _ I O Ul 1^ U j _ < M HI X ^ IIIS M V* 7 i Kiin u i:3as HI O O O Ul *8 lO X > > ^ M P Ul IM SI- «sin u u S S I CH .... s|N O O ut N8? <P^88gg i 8U as;m g U . R ■RS A "58* -®“£«8 Ul O ORS.&S8 HI 8 M HI •^5 £ ^ssjo^S7 M > o ^ 9 ^•K HI HI ^ O fc ^ 5 -iu. 2MHiXOg HI o ^ 9(HI O *8 “I O. U 2 lU Ul M HI CM HI in in •• !• mu Ul •t HI S m«Mmo K ^ Ul -«H- Ul "S3moL ^-»g H O HI HI Ul in 3 ft m 3 Ul %ii Ul H O CM ^ ^ CM ^ SoSSim o HI CM HI in in “«Cb HI •1 Ul HI »in 0 Ml K a CMHIinm03-^ 04 0 ^ in n K ac B I- 2 it S I p H ft ^ A uj m ^ < M M *4 m IS RsiiSS CM HI mCM HIinin K HI HI asl I 2 ftRsasas 2 __ Ul Ul o Ul Q <«.« -« 0 ft 2 It CM «• ft O > S o ft ft ft u •4 O III Ul <-4 Hm 2 z ^ m ^ UJ Ul >< >* o -• Ul O ^ HI HI ^M M Ul O H ►- H > m"ags-s ■ O X X u< _ =*gS8® • — ►< QS Se B B E K "* 8 o o o i3 >4 Ui Ul 0 0 N B B — j m e u. lu N X ■V ^ ^SSHi< nHI H ft CM •"•51^ ft ^ U 2 § -si§»sRsIliS HI m Ul CM3o ^g0 04 H Ul HI HI Ul *^8CM I s:8 85 S55 I 04 in ft ^ CH Ul Ul HI ssISs * zsss M»- % M M < 5?s S "znn _ ^is. jg«. P4 H m . lo K a Hi £ ?S&K2-sf ’aBL ^ ^ $ yj III 10 ssSSS 9 s f s I-i fO CM lO I- IQ CM <C 2 10 tfl I M lU =a|sS*I "“8*SeOM •^5 -s-lal 10s s H•r ^ M M Ul ^ S3 Ul UJ So 3 !3 % lOss lA lA Kt «l>33Kt <A rt M 5 3 CST “ Sol CM Ul car ,He 10 >• E lO O I- o"^28 S QU M !o So •o « lA lA lo a CM < I M 1^ ''asgsiis Ro5-505^ ut lip M ^ fc •0 10 IQ lO CM Kl lA lA ft SissS^ ^ sS:83! 2-^1!^2|afisassays Ul kh 5; wmm § 3 0 „ 0 «• ® X ^p.4 ►- Q {- UJ H H lA 10 COKings a 898i?S93 1 M ^ lO CMro lA lA lA CO SSog OP ^ io o -* ■^ lA CM fA lA lA as3"S asosis D W V ^ Ul Ul ^ 0 ^8223 "^33SSO Ul Ul S 8 M U Ul MI M M Ul lA lA fA CM lA lA lA lA a -A CM ^ 3 CM ssS HI «r> 2 HI Q{ J . * ^235 51 M -> 5Sg si. 2-II9l9‘0 w .22 0ft i 0^ >c HI 0 < ^las S99S * *® 2 Q S So «n3SS lA CM lA lA lA »A lA 10 fA CM fA lA lA CM lA lA 10 Ul Ul fA CM fA lA lA lA HM M 0 OS Ul lA 3 .4 K m M ro«« J- {-S3HI tt •S’Su.ifc i I;g°®S5 •A S »A lA lA lA Si Ul fA a CM =®“a|| Ss3|s| asslsi lA H Ul 10 10 1 CM 2 Ul K ^ Ul 2euup*^» iAlllmnCO fA ssaas* I M M M j381598 I **89 .31111Jo O Ul Ul □ "l-i*! «li|! ^a||-S bsIISs ^ H Ul Ul ""Ei fA CM 3 3 0 tt Ul IM ^?235;_ 23<4Si ^ «s33 ro a S *^ >: 5tr. etos S3 r o|S3NUJ S 2 9|2u»5 III 9 CL O S K Q Ul • « t »•; I I , ,■ X .• • *. » * *• te*.,* «,.»*• •• >v^*^.. ?>/> 5! •‘. f .V *. '. I ‘.•V •* v i I ' <y V.v ,* t» ■ • • ' ' ■" \ ,•% . » ' X 7' ‘ •' •" ^ V...... ‘ •' *7 ----- \..‘ V ‘ ^ V . ; * i* •• /..• • */ • • .' • * • *r *.** •* ,»• '^ * • ■ V ' ' .• ‘ -V • • •-■ •- , , » . • ■ » • ■ • y ..•**• 9:>r« < ^ fc* » - • • • » V ;•* ^ • •. /* t. ptviCV' o ^ ,<.■??• ’ • ' '’‘Vv-C i-r v.n ■ FRENCH LAKE S^ifc¥:-v< Si4}" t!, / ■■ . ■. < c*: ‘.,»flc:i. • _ m • . •■-.■■•••.■ • •' , . . • ••>■■ U.. .' .;: t .* >'»*• .4— s» tuyc^ .h!?* I SS'' ^0? ,i*"' ni’*''WA>. gaBgrj?' gaSKi^ W^4 /V-'. i!u''e .i. ,: 7T7-^\« •rT> r“ 's:: '*1^ -.4 « * f . 1 ''A-. t «t; \K .9 > ?" ^ I - nrm • i- •» V •*\ \i .f •« »* .■< wi p Members Members Mr. Ned % Orono P.O. Box Crystal Dear Oro Pl< have bee regardir a 17-uni 2300 Nor Th€ portion Mr. Dayt have sor writing Fii used by melted : systems and jet: and/or < neighboi Api from ea. continue propert of what propert western Th souther breadth into Mr We be disi or disa 9w ’» i r -y '*1-4 N?« •«!?• ^V. Po'Ljr.j* ■* -.'.i^-i' , ^ 8 >* / • K '^ *C .1 ^ % , 1 “ vv. ■ V ia^ ' ■• .*■fe^e Ir^., ,:‘*rr- vt/ ---- rv . j-rjr flr*' vt/ •. ‘ t •. <'■-' (Si?:'. .•-i/'" r :/ .1 ''■-■■i ^ .^. , -1. : -■■' '- I fefc- > miW' /■’K:2?«lr 7 Kt l^li^4't- t*f. - J .' r 1-® PI .;. i ■ ; .vA ALEXANDER J. AND DIANNE F. JENTILUCCI P.O. BOX 27, 1295 BRIAR STREET CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 553236l2/il73-205M July 16, 1984 Members of the Orono Planning Commission Members of the Orono City Council Mr. Ned Dayton % Orono City Office P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323Ui jfovaj. I I Dear Orono Planning Commission, City Council, Mr. Ned Dayton: Please consider this letter as our written comments that have been solicted according to the Notice from the City of Orono regarding Mr. Dayton’s application for a proposed subdivision of a 17-unit Planned Residential Development of property located at 2300 North Shore Drive. The western edge of our property abuts this parcel ^long a portion of its eastern border. While we arc very pleased with Mr. Dayton’s proposed use and development of this land, we do have some concerns and comments which we would like to state in writing at this time. Firstly, the entire southern border of our property is being used by the City of Orono to capture ’’runoff” of rainwater, melted snow, ooze from those properties that have failing systems which are draining into the streets, all sorts of f o s and jetsam that washes down the streets, and any other liquid and/or debris that becomes ’’runoff” from virtually the entire neighborhood. Approximate!v two-thirds of the way down our southern border from east to wes.. there begins an underground tile. This tile continues down the balance of the southern border of our property, continues (underground) across the east to west breadth of what would appear to be proposed outlot of Mr. Dayton 5 property, and lets out into the wooded marshy wetland at the western edge of this proposed outlot. The above mentioned ’’runoff” enters our property along its southern border, enters the above mentioned tile, travels the breadth of Mr. Dayton’s property as above described, and runs out into Mr. Dayton’s proposed outlot wetland pond. We cannot state emphatically enough that this tile may not 1)^ The consequences of the disturbance, destruction or disablement of this tile would be devastating to our property. ^ ■ * * KBS'Si'i t; t K t ' Vj ■•' • • w-.-- i- •:•'■. 1 -vr , - '^Ta-.A."H-: v:P^.- .'^-TA July 16, 198M Page 2 Secondly, we are concerned about the conifers that have been planted along the eastern border of Mr. Dayton's property. Some, if not all of these trees are Blue Colorado Spruce which have a moderate growth rate and will potentially gain a mature height of eighty to one hundred feet. Aside from the fact that these conifers are planted much too closely together to become healthy mature trees, their potential height endangers not only our property, but all property abutting. This area is the regular recipient of high winds and severe storms which enter from the southwest, west and northwest. Had these conifers been at or near their mature height just a year ago, there is every possibility that they could have been topped or toppled in the terrible storm that hit in early July. The destruction that could have resulted on abutting properties is unthinkable. And, even at half of mature height, these conifers will block late afternoon sun from our property, darken evening skies preiD3tur6ly for uSf and prevent us from witnessing the beauty of sunsets. For these reasons, and most especially for the reason outlined in the above paragraph, we ask that these conifers be removed. Thirdly, we are concerned about the possibility of the destruction or disturbance of existing wooded areas and wetlands on Mr. Dayton's property. There is an abundance of wildlife that habitat this parcel. There are deer, pheasant, ducks and geese, racoon, and all sorts of other furry and featured creatures. We hope that great care will be taken to upset this ecology as little as possible. Fourth, we are greatly concerned about the fact that this proposed subdivision will have on-site septic systems rather than city sewer. Because sewer hookup is physically so close at hand, not only for Mr. Dayton's property, but also for the Crystal Bay area in its entirety, we feel that simultaneously incorporating sewer into his proposed development as well as the badly needed city sewer within the Village would be most efficient and beneficial to all involved. We thank you for the time you have taken to review our comments and concerns as contained in this letter. We trust that they will be taken seriously into consideration by all parties involved with this proposed project. We also would like to state that while these written comments contain our major concerns regarding Mr. Dayton's project, they are not to be construed as being all of our concerns surrounding this matter. Respectfully submitted. Alexander J. and Dianne F. Jentilucci m-si i • si". i •I'-i mV'i-' K ■ Ar^MMifiMlM Applies A) Lot LIST 01 Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Review At you that t! The va north have e them oi 16, 17 have n< they h. 80% St sellir The se would: Paul C area o He und he wou a surv ave been r. Some , have a lelght of ise healthy ►ur tgular >m the it or Ln the that lill ng skies eauty of reason ers be the wetlands life that id geesey ires. We r as it this ither than i at hand, stal Bay lorating f needed id our trust that ;>arties e to state serns trued as bmitted, ’^1 ‘V>- ir A I i w ■j*' •:% :v or ■r-^rr-.- ■ Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:July 11, 1984 SUBJECT: #783 I.D. Caples, 4798 North Shore Drive - Variance Application - Variance Lot Area Required ■ 1 acre or 43,560 sf Existing = .35 acre or 15,360 sf ♦"with 15* of right of way" = .41 acre or ^®»285 sf ♦"with 30* of right of way" « .495 acre or 21,585 sf Variance — .65 acre or 65% With 15* Variance * .59 acre or 59% With 30* Variance * .505 acre or 50% ♦Based on partial vacation of Maple Avenue B) Lot Width Required Existing Variance 140* 75* 65* or 46% LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Revised survey by staff May 11 letters to Campbell + Turney July 3 letters to Cambell + Turney Planning Commission minutes of April 16,1984 Review of Application #783 At your April 16, 1984 meeting. Planning Commission advised Caples that the City would approve of the partial vacation of Park Avenue. The vacation would enable applicant to acquire additional lots on north side of Park Avenue for combination with subject property. I have enclosed copies of letters to the two property owners advising them of Caples intent. Turney and Campbell as joint owners of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18 plan to develop the property as one building site. They l)3ve not had the area confirmed by a surveyor but it is their guess that they have .8 acres or 80%. They have advised Caples that based on the 80% standard for sewered properties, they would have no interest in selling off one of the lots. The second exchange of letters asked for the 15* of right of way that would revert back to Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18 upon vacation of Park Avenue. Paul Campbell called me from Washington to seek confirmation of the area of the four lots and I advised that only a surveyor could do this. He understood Caples dilema but based on the approximate guess on area, he would not be willing to release the 3,000 sf of additional area. If a survev is made confirming the area of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18,^hey 4 ti 4 O •? r I- Revi€ with the appl- varii If nc mone: Find Plar wit! of V < 'Ifeb ariance r285 s£ L,585 sf 984 /ised Caples Park Avenue. >nal lots on jroperty. I ers advising s of Lots 15 r site. They Lr guess that based on the ) interest in t of way that Park Avenue. nation of the ould do this. [uess on arear lalarea. If 1 n l- ■ M- i^'-V |1k ™ ■f ■ t .i: Svt^' m A'<“ .y#- ;■ X kArrt. : • • . . • •• > •.-:'/ •. •■' 'i Ji' I i* • t ■ > lniM r. »'-v mm■'.At- Review the facts on the first tedt^ with vacation of Park Avenue. ®®. „„gt qive direction to the Xi,e application. Planf«9 ^^Zfssion recoJltnd approval of the applicant. Can Planning right of way of Park Avenue. variance application with advised now before any more time andIf not, than applicant should be advised now oero money is spent on the applies -ion. Findings for denial would be as follows: -- - - - - - - - 1. Applicant was aware a* to" the**site.and that a variance would be requireo to »u * ^ ^a Au..s:«ws Planning commission should be aware that th^ with the application confirmed area exclusive of way at 15,360 sf.ui. wcijr - If Planning Commission can approve ^“^“^J^pproval"^^^ direct the ihe vacation of Park Lane than give of Park vacation . s;?in .. tb. - i" »“■ >■' >• fjf* \^m~A kl j J >* v * I, r'0 ■?V ■> # i^: ■-ft (•: .■ ; . •* r >: rea increases r further with ;tion to the oval of the E Park Avenue. more time and Lor to purchase >n the site. te will not be snt. irvey submitted y road 19 right ment subject to . and direct the cation of Park )letion of the ;eed with the remember the i 80% in area. V. i r-'V <*-V '<.’V'v ♦ 7-n. .'I 1*. ^ s>* rate cl‘^i.rv&y . u.O 'i;)la:: •i:r-:i--i-iurkAril 5»ir-c-jj:-.t o- ..ir.:l->r. ;’ii ?^rl< •iOMiowii* County, Kir.nenotM r-z/rw; SEP I 41963 P.ITY OF ORONO i% ^ A I hc*rVi:v.' cor ill';.^ o*. . u ij a Irv.o -»nc r.crr»^c■t .•iVfsf f/nt of y Sf^/on 7-lf7-f^ \ rorr'.-cor.ViU*ior. o*' o mrvr.y of t! ’;.oi.r.:;>.r3''r of Lot 10 one tr/j t o:iT’t of .^t *>' ly iUf* rtirtl'.v.ortorlo o' u lir.-- •. h poinu cr. 'Av*. -Zfui"? \*orti)-=!aF.t.crJ.y of P iio lo^ 9 '^iLt-ar.t Iv 0: yt ••.>rt‘.voi:l- «rl;*^’•c::. V-r. L'^rtori;; cc.r:i: r cf v<-.id Ijot 9 to tf* :*ost 5outli‘*.rL;’ corr.or ci * Lot 9, all ir I'loik ^ "lo-.Tquisl fc •..ickl-'.c's Pary, Ik-vnr.a-v-r, Co. W;..y- the Icaotion of all oxistiar tulialarti i- say v..-;.vc... I othor i;rT>Tcvor;ontr. or onr-rc-rh' -iril: . ..ir-a •* ' or: ort to cr.ov G0HIX):i R. COFFIN 1« = 40’ ?-26-?-3 ^ Iron wjrker Kork S. Gronburg R^u. No.1^755 Lnnd Sur/cyorc and Planiiwrc Long Lake, Minnesota f* U- ■' r ^ //.i- May 1 Mr. P 1A630 Wood! Re: Dear Lot 9 to ob feet 18. addre Youri Ann ( Attoi ACS:1 cc: ©gMllfi) SEP I 4I9B3 y nF ORONO #••• - • .*O* . . W V. 1 rcrr^rt r. 0*’jfj *•1 r« ?ot’ lar.t. 10 cS .iot 9 ly v.-.. r/■j i.ir.*- a po inv or. •AmJ *•o' f'li- • r,*. #;1 i:ort’.voi- if %*VI •C>• ml.r cT r.;:id )rr.t!r ci r*iia «/0 • ili*** onv t.r‘ •‘or; ort IMC r<5,:. NC.1W5 ur.iiwrc * ■ \ ". ’ 1 J V' \ ■ ? i"- 1PK- •:•■.' -.•V'Vr'»•.-/•••.'‘j S- .iiW fcNfr- '.; 4; ~ :v. >4/7^ C. Schulz Auorncy at Law 935 East Wayzaia Btvd. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612)476-0122 rviisSiIulM \ j If—......* ^ . I' MW 1 4 1984 ,,i i___P riTY OF ORONO May 11, 198A Mr. Paul V. Campbell 1A630 - 181st Street Place Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98072 Re: Lots 15 and 18, "Bcrgquist & Wicklund's Park," Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Mr, Campbell: My Client, Mr. I.D. Caples, has recently purchased Lot 10 and Part of Lot 9 in "Berquist & Wicklund’s Park" in Orono, Minnesota. Due to the restrictive zoning provisions in Orono, he has been unable to obtain a building permit until he acquires approximately 6,000 square feet of additional land. Please contact me at your earliest convenience: I have enclosed an addressed, stamped envelope. Thanks very much Tours very truly. Ann C. Schulz Attorney at Law ACS:keh cc: Mr.and Mrs. I.D. Caples City of Orono *aR5?^-r May 11 Mr. Da 3AA Pv Kailu£ Dear 1 Lot 9 to ob feet addr< Your Ann Attc ACS: cc: Ann C. Schulz Aiuirncy »\ La»' 935 East Wayzata Blvd. Wayzaia, Mtuacsota 5539J (612) 476-0122 Mr. David G. Tumey 34A Puukinai Place Kailua, Hawaii 9673A Be- Lots 16 and 17, "Bergquist & Vicklund's ?ark, Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Mr. Turney: ro okrara ^iidi^rre™- rirke"arqre: rppri:;«iytors,rr* feet of additional land. Xke Orono city records ^^rtTi ^e Tkotfor^Lse Totsl 17 Are you interested in selltng all or part o ’ Please contact »e at your earliest convenience: 1 have enclosed an addressed, stamped envelope. Thanks very much. Yours very truly. Ann C. Schulz Attorney at Law ACS:keh cc: Mr. and Mrs. 1. D. Caples City of Orono and part of been unable 000 square Lots 16 and of these lots? inclosed an -:ijy:;3£;."-Lj==a. .si Ann C. Schulz Attorney at Law 935 East Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 476-0122 T^ilS© »» m 1—■S" .» / . a • •wee *> • . - 51984 i CITY OF OROiMO July 3* 1984 14630*^18Ut“treet Place Northeast Woodinville, WA 98072 «e: Lots 13 and 18. ••Berg,«lst 4 Wichlun8*s Path." Hennepin Count,. Minnesota Dear Mr. Campbell: . «.« Pat-ir Avenue which lies immediately Zc^ot l°rtheri,“!i- or,rr%ropert,. Fifteen (15) feet «o«ld be available to my client Mr. Caples. It is «, "Lwever!1s*5ou“tatwf“^o“^^S "re r:n^rrtr if - -id a;,uir^e 'W «tteen feet of the vacated avenue. /r:: r^rirariiedrt t IrrHld irh^t ror:Trr%!"3ir,^ » pnce .r.. 3ui.,8 square feet now belonging to you and Mr. Turney. AS a planning connission meeting is scheduled for duly 16. 1984. I would appreciate your immediate attention. Thanks very much. Yours very truly. Ann C. Schulz Attorney at Law ACS:kfs oc Jean Mabusth I. D. Caples Mr. Dav 348 Puu Kailua, The Cit South o availab It 1-^ m order t prove n vacated I belie 18 is 3 1983, h to offe square As a pi appreci Thanks Yours ^ Ann C. Attorm ACS:kft cc Jej I.] mty, Minnesota mnediately t would be n feet in reatly im- ;t of the 16, 17 and in Augv.st am authorized or the 3142.96 4, I would s> iama^siQ>i —t • ■ i.i ■. '■.■%v BeaMI0|: Ann C. Schulz Aiiorncy al Law Wi East Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, Minnesota 5539 J (612} 476-0122 July 3, 1984 !fl5\ 1 • ' .. I ^ - 5 « Mr. David G. Turney 348 Puukinai Place Kailua, Hawaii 96734 £UY OF QRfil- Re; Lots 16 and 17, "Bergquist & Wicklund's Park,” Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Mr. Turney: The City of Orono has agreed to vacate Park Avenue which lies immediately South of the Southerly line of your porperty. Fifteen (15) feet would be available to my client Mr. Caples. It is my understanding that you do not need the additional fifteen feet in order to have a buildable site. However, as you know, it would greatly im prove my client’s position if he could acquire ”your” fifteen feet of the vacated Avenue. I believe the square footage for the 15 feet adjacent to Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18 is 3142.95. When Mr. Caples acquired Lot 10 and part of Lot 9 in August 1983. he paid approximately 29c per square foot. Consequently, I am authorized to offer to you $ 911.46 (ie. 3142.96 X $ .29) as a sales price for the 3142.96 square feet now belonging to you and to Mr. Campbell. As a planning commission meeting is scheduled for July 16, 1984, I would appreciate your immediate attention. Thanks very much Yours very truly. Ann C. Schulz Attorney at Law ACS:kfs cc Jean Mabusth I.D. Caples * • i.' • I •y. 4' 4 ► ■ ...•iV'm-i • it- mm k .. :■ t "X ■V- 'f- * •‘nrjr-:r> ov thf F^,^: .ATi’r.UI\M:CE 7:30 P.I 1024 EUGEIIE ROSCUT (40 TOMrvAV.'A P''\D FPELIMIlird^Y SULDIV rUliLIC UETJ^IITG 7:20 - 7:33 P.M. I.D. Cr.vLT:3 4703 Lor/iii ccord: v Vi.r:z/ii;cE ) m . *V . . ite I''■!■■ '.' r-ff^ -Si984 ,,, ‘Lk/-•-MrF QRQi\tn nty, Minnesota mediately would be en feet in greatly im- et of the , 16, 17 and ^ in August 1 am authorized for the 31A2.96 I would '^S ■ii *\A J itift .S- iV4 tiSI 5 }S ■w. ,V i>;-imm 'niuv^:n o?-* thf Pi.nmiriic; corniissioii liLCTiira op april J6, 1904.PAGU 1 .AMKHPriKCE 7:30 P.M. 1024 F.UGE1IE ROSEUTIIAL < 4 0 TOUrvAV.'A P'* ?iD tPELIMIE/J^Y &0LDIVIGI0II rEur.ic ultj>.ii:g 7:20 - 7:33 P.li. i‘- i a. \n i.u, cr.i^h::3 4Voa ixr.'iii CL'om: dhivc Vi.r:iia:c« •• / «t > «• m 0, f * m The Planning Commission mot on tho above date. The following members were present: Chairperson Goett^n, Povegno, 7idams, Kelley, Siroe, and Callahan. CounciiMcmbcr Adams was present. Zoning Adminis trator Mabusth and Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron v/ere present. _l*r. and Mrs. Rosenthal v;orc present. Zoning Administrator noted the affidavit of publication and tlio certificate of mailing. Dale Kennedy repre- sciited the Carlsons. r.ovcgr.o moved, Giir.e seconded, to approve the tv;o lot pl«'it or Eugene Rosenthall finding all standards of the L!'.-lD toning district have boon satisfied, subject to tlic following conditions; 1. Approved access to nev/ lot. 2. Aj-piicant must decide on sov;er connection location. a. ‘Dedication of rig)it of way at southwest corner for Co; ,ty Road 135 but dedication is not to encroach into the ;;etlands. 4. Iryr.ent of $200 part: fee. 5.i:sv;ly created let may not have riparian rights. Vote: 7.ycs (C), Mays (0). I.D. Ccples ;:as present. Ann Cchuis, attorney, v;as p;:ccf.st. Ueila Clifford v;as present. Schuls noted that this lot is tho same siso* lot as all other lota in ti:at area. Dchuls stated that thin lot han been assessed for sewer. r.s'-cg..o as!:cd \;hcro tho garage would bo placed? Ecliulr. stated t'nat it will ho a tuck under garage. ^*ei4i.ng /•s;>imiSi.iator l.ahustli stated that tho road should ho vacated? Goetten stated that if tho road was to bo vacated that there could bo additional lots that may be buildablc cites. Ci # t { i i * • «. .......... foil joEii nn: 1C 20 cnriDTi:oi V/JrtlAlXE CC14 JOhn Eh 3402 LYRIC A’ VAUI7J.CF. e. The rperson llahan. dminis- strator Zoning ;ion and repre- tv;o lot s of the >ject to ncction :ncr for ich into rights. icy, was Ls noted lots in as been iced? garage, ho roa«1 ted that lildablc ».IAi;CF. o Kelley stated that ho would ho in favor of th';: vacation. Rovegno stated that the survey is not corroct. Sime stated that the applicant should try to attain additional land by vacating Par#: Avenue and a now survey should ba done. Sin.e noted that tl)o cipplicant was placed on notice that the lot way not be bt.i Idable. Sima stated that he would not he in favor of the variance unless the applicant acquirer, additional land. Callahan noted that even if you vacate Park Avenue the lot v;ould still be substandard. Cal?alujn stated that ho \;ould have a hard time appr -ving this variance application because it could set a precedent for the rest of the neighborhood. Schulz stated tliat if the applicant cculd ^i^nui ro an additional 6,000 sf it v;ould bring thr. lot closer to tliG other lots. Adai.is feit that it would be a aood use of the property to put a house in the lot and that it ‘would fit in with the rest of the neighborhood. Adams stated that ho would be in favor of granting the variance. Kelicy agreed v;ith Callahan that the lot is very substandard. Sir.'.e moved, Kelley seconded, to table the variance application to allov/ the applicant time to c):ploro the idea cl: acquiring additional land, for the ap‘plicant to got another survey and for applicant to explore the access issue. Vote: Ayes tO), Kays (0). John Kricson was present. Ericson asked that the City table his variance application to allow his attorney to review the Zoning Administrator’s memo. Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded, to table the Ericson variance application. Vote; Ayes (6), Kays (0). John Ericson v/as present. Ericson stated that at the last Planning Comraission meeting they asked him to explore acquiring additional land. Ericson stated that ho does not intend to buy the lot next door. Ericson stated that ho didn't want to put any more money into the land. * I ■ 1 • ) ! i • «• i . I *•: V--, V r TO: FRG DAT SUE Zor Api LIS Exl Ex] Ex] Exl Exl Ex Ex! Th 19 sh th Ap Th si lo ex is tc tc oz ir A] pi w< £] h< a< hi Lo attain nrl a now ipplicant . i IrJablo, r of the 3'Ji tionai vemio the atO'J that variance t for the •'ouire an closer to roperty to 11 with the t he would very variance iplore the applicant :plore the it the City > attorney lo Ericson lays (0). that at the :cd him to 3on stated icjit door. t any more * A • 'htm TO Planning Commission FROM:Michael P. Gaffron» Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:July 11, 1984 SUBJECT:#827 C.D. Williams, 1932 Fagerness Point Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-IC = 1/2 acre minimum lot size Application - Replace existing structure, add garage LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey of Existing structures and hardcover Revised proposal and plans Hardcover calculations Planning Commission Minutes 5-21-84 This application was brought before the Planning Commission o"14, 1984. At that time you advised the applicant to revise his prop shL no net increase in hardcover. Total Appliclnts^originarpr^^ sf or 38 percent. The revised proposal you now have reflects the elimination of sidewalks, the metal shed, and the existing gravel driveway, and locates a house and attached garage mostly within the confines of the existing house and patio area (see Exhibit E). Then«w proposed house is 1,626 sf with a driveway and entry sidewalk totaling 276 total of 1,902 sf or 30 percent hardcover. Applicant notes he could taper the driveway (narrower near the street) to further reduce hardcover, but I question whether this t® ^e or easily enforced. It would likely force a seconu car to have to park in the limited street area rather than in the driveway. additional lakeshore encroachment is contemplated. hSrLoiJer be ad^heTe'dL ^wo options: 1. Use a totally porous driveway pavement; or 2. Eliminate the main floor bath and bedroom. m fi .f .-4 41; ^ i ■ #827 Page July Lot . Lot 1 Lake Fron Left Righ Hard 5^ j. , -»■ t'.'r- •.-.wife,,..rJ£iini»»**riil^''ilii,. ;-:>(h: Lstrator id - Variance rer don on May 14» is proposal to Icover (all in r 27 percent, percent• mination of ivewayr and ifines of the oposed house J76+ sf for a lar the street) s is realistic to have to park ray. ardcover, this etbacks of 10* existing 15* to n the existing ickf so that no et increase in it two options: ■.%1*1 > ■ . i\ t. k if 1* 9 'r*827 Williams Page 2 July 11, 1984 REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE Lot Area 21,780 6,327 .15,453 or 61% Lot Width 100*99*1* or 1% Lake Setback 75*30*45' or 60% Front (street)Setback 30*15*15* or 50% Left Side 10*10*0 Right Side 10*15*0 Hardcover 1,681 or 27%2,078 or 30% existing proposed -rr. in Kl M M CL • lUo o nz <zQ. h- CLO eg M CL r4 OUJO CL tt o >- in ►- in in X g“UJ >• O z M UJ § UJ tn ui H* U H cg UJ o Z tn tt CL in 4 fsj UJ < r) - I o Id CO < 2 iH U. -I -7 E iH ►- J B ^z uj 0 •-I Q < a in £ X <^ >- u u <0 iH < M II #n o CL z 0 rUJ h- in >• in ozzo M H fH l-l < H •H O r in o z Z M o c O -1 in II u.in in z in iJ UI II M z z: UI in CL UI « V z eg UI z zH 5 1 O UJ < c tt o < z z c Ui iH z < o « CL V iH z c I 0X1- c M o o CM >- >- i C^ o O r <0 M -I «l < fO O .J ^ oc M IH o o a UJ IL. M in m in eg UJ m CL eg UJ »IS f-4 U. •H Ifs. eg cOtn e •a c •J -I I M M I UJ UJ X X • U U I M M I I UJ I So:l UJ < a?i2ssg *3- or 60% or 50% iff ■*i t .r'4^’ f.’-r ’ ^ ;■ s K> to X ^ CM yj o Zz < >- ro tt tt M> CM UJ < D I CO O CDN ^ •H U. -j “> rHI Q z lu »-• r* o < X Xa >- u CO M < M Kl O fiC X s in to CO CM IfcJ q: u. t-r < < X in N «% u ^ >- M o« < CK Z ri 3 «• z < < CM N Z Z to ^ O O 9^ <o o a O < CK Q O Z CM < < >• N tt < lU CL lU O. X O 7 X < CL S < Z CL O H ..• ■ r-%^ -V .• H (0 CO O Z CO CO CL «H M M M to O K H H g“-SS5 CO VI U Q to CO £ iH CM ^ CU lil Z CO fO to CL -j -i CO to CM MJ M M UJ in I CO X X z < < < CL •H lA. u U I «i «9 f^ F-l O 111 111 CM U Uc- S D CO M CL K to O CD CD o H O CL Z 3 UJ 10 M COU. fc M Z iH O O CL S CMo 3 M e eC «H o M rHoCOH h- Ch p c^ 3 to•8 CL r-4 to CO UJ IL to to CM UJ lO CM lO ^ CO to z >- >- CO lO -J CO lO •J -1 CO to to CL ^ -1 CO to -i CO M M UJ 10 CM Ul -J ^ UJ CM O UJ X Z z 1 A9 Ul UJ Z _1 z z ^ ooS < rH U.X X 3 Z Ul X iH *** 3 Z -J UJ UJ X ^-.S5 rd -% •% o •H Q COZ O < <1 < <1 UJ UJ u.r«*a o UL H t^— ^ t< - M Ch < CL CL IH z U < m ! ^4 r= fv K- V L. ^1. >:> 5W •4 Ldt 19 Avenue a distance Southwest corner 33®1*8 ‘ Last a dts tlnuing Soutn 33^ tonka; thence Sou or less, to its i beginning; thence marked by a judic to the point of b< aients from or on assumed to be a d line of said aven Scale:1« . 20* Da te :li-?7-«3 0 :Iron marke ® 'Judicial 1 1 «"< Ceriiricate of Survey for Donal'J J. Kelly in Lot ?7, Fa*>rne£is Heimepin County, Kinneso^a ^-Xh't &• ’-r O#827 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot ?7, Fafc;ernets, and tlie accretion to Lots and ?i, ragerness, described as follows: Commencing at the ictorsec- tion of t2ie extension Southeasterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 19 and the Southerly line of Under the Linden Avenue,which point is marked by a judicial landmark; thence North* easterly along the SouUierly line oj said Under the Linden Avenue a distance of 61:.9 feet, said point bein^ distant 75 feet Nortneasterly Irom the Southwest corner of said Lot ?7, whicn point is marked by a judicial landriark; tnence Soutn 33%6' Last a distance of 61: feet, which point is marked by a judicial landmark; thence con tinuing Soutn 33%6' East a distance oi 8 feet, more or less, to tnc shore ol Lake Minne tonka; thence Southwest-erly alon;^ the shore of Lake Minnetonka a distance of 97*7 feet,more or less, to its intersection with a line which bears South ?1^06' i!.ast from the point of beginning; thence North ?1®013* West a distance of 11 ftJ®t. more or less, said point being marked by a judicial landmark; thence continuing North ?1”08* West a distance of 53.1:5 feet to the point of beginning, and the location of all buildings tnereon and all visible encroach nents from or on said land. For purposes of this description the North line of Eagerness is assumed to be a due c,ast and West line. No attempt has been made to survey the right-of-way line of said avenue because insufficient data are furnisited on the record plat. 1« • ?o* U-?7-83 Iron marker Judicial landmark GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. Gordon K. Coffin hffg. No. 606U Hark S. Gronberg Reg, No.l?755 Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota &vj c»^nt< •/ I? .iTiSSfcr Certificate of Survey for Donald J. Kelly in Lot ?7, Fagerness Hennepin County, Kinnesoia #827 •c't •’•I I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 27, Fagerness, and the accretion to Lots 19 and ?7, Fagerness, described as follows: Commencing at the intorsec- ^ tion of tne extension Southeasterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 19 and the Southerly line of Under the Linden Avenue,which point is marked by a judicial landmark; thence North easterly along the Southerly line of said Under the Linden Avenue a distance of 6U.9 feet, said point being distant 75 feet Nortneasterly from the Southwest corner of said Lot ?7, which point is marked by a judicial Isadmark; tnence South 33®U8* Last a distance of 6U feet, which point is marked by a judicial landmark; thence con tinuing South 33%B' East a distance of 8 feet, more or less, to tnc shore ol Lake Minne tonka; thence Southwesterly along Uie shore of Lake Minnetonka a distance of 97*7 feet,more or less, to its intersection with a line which bears South ?1®08' aast from the point of beginning; thence North 21®08* West a distance of II feet, more or less, said point being marked by a judicial landmark; thence continuing North 21 ”08' West a distance of 53.U5 feet to the point of beginning, and the location of all buildings thereon and all visible encroach meats from or on said land. For purposes of this description the North line of Fagerness is assumed to be a due c.ast and West line. No attempt has been made to survey the right-of-way line of said avenue because insufficient data are furnished on the record plat. GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. 1« . 20' U-27-83 Iron marker Judicial landmark hcFg. No. U)6U Keg. No.12755 Gordon k. Coffin Mark S. Gronberg Land Surveyors and Planners Lon' Lake, Minnesota ■r f i 'f ' ■ *•' X • its n V •* ^ • r • f ----- Leaf k4} . . • • » ' ' *■ ■ * • •! * J"* •. % • .’5 '• . % . ! • f * % • . *w** • •:/ t.-. i •1 t ' • • • • • I I *. » . • N > I 0 I \, • r. * 0. I *• . . . ■ .• \ • V' : ,s'.-" i::.i ■ ■t--- r #827 CITY OF ORONO I hereby certify that this is a trae and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot ?7» Page mess, and Uie accretion t Lots 19 and ?7, ragerness, described ollows: Commencing at the intorsec- the extens^ion Southeasterly of the sterly line of said Lot 19 and the ine of Under the Linden Avenue ,i«hich >y a judicial landmark; thence North- liierly line of said Under the Linden 75 feet Nortneasterly from the rj a judicial landmark; tnence South i by a judicial landmark; thence con- less, to tnc shore ol Lake Hinne- 'letonka a distance of 97*7 feet,more ith ?1®08’ aast from the point of »t. more or less, said point being >1°08' West a distance of 53.U5 feet lings thereon and all visible encroach Iption the North line of Page mess is been made to survey the right-of-way shed on Uie record plat. GORDON R. COFPIN CO., INC. (iordon K. Coffin kdf.6. ko. f)06L Mark $. Gronberg Keg. No.l?755 Land Surveyors and Planners Lon; Lake, .Minnesota I i 4' ii» /• ^ ■ •• • • e • • . #• * •'* 0 C • L • • • *. •'t* ♦.. . • * fc.* •\ . "i' • . . • - *1 * • • «• .T • I . !■]i •:, I 9N > II3I i i J . •R : I « \ «. • a • •. / ••)* f I • V • .♦ . ••• .f * • • ! m imH.fes?Siim - i> i A ■ji .1 M ‘i'll-!v"«3 tfv?a j b Ur 1•" !;'i| i'lr iAhfM «rJuJ ■»»wa tTt»e ue-vi A#.v‘ fv Jv - •>» •■•T &K1- 1V}a^ '.tl,m i V. • r'ljA-V. ••T. i T.C v' iPi P '“tj -U •9$''S»'I ! I HIOV1 KOI *ftMi V .'uTV'i,>t LV.U%< v^a > 1 I* •’. ‘ •A’ *>• * fmmii • ^ I .• V. •V ii: \ \0 ..»I i**'/ j? ■ Is .* (i •r *»r. 't- V. 'll ii:u 3- v ■? i B p < t: •• .m 5 FlitY . • •,..9 |Vm&Wi>i Ipfe mm • • % ^w 'W •2.^‘A I ‘;A*' •:Vji • A' :\^y>V*. r .V r r,® ? J-Vk’ •111 mi ii . V • V :: » ‘ •:• •’ IB I I ’. . > !• ••«i ^ ^ f r •g -i?i fj *i s’ ili^'vAv gw, tfli? rVvikm:^ 'mtmmife i^m mv--^ %■' *-'X'k ^*• : Vi ,:•? i r ■’ •• ■^r rVn»--^r'^r ■' -- ^ '. * - .>. . ••hmm m EP> ^ --■ LMafc'-f mm^ m¥M L-"&*;"^: Oi*i- ■- ■;,( 1■®:.n f=r -y -.' -Ai. ‘-V ■ I f*V« V . ‘ •» V if; jip ;•' V- '“tiir rcj •■ o [SgrSfcSir %!?■ '/..*• t* r, . • r>^ K ,. "w . ^;1 }4%v V ”; * fe»S*},,S-V: . . *’^i, -^ *. •,• * -W-*’- ■ -AYe^'i.v'*. ■*4-'4 ■ V*'*^ • ' • i t •' »• • . »• • * r* ‘ ; . . V • ♦ .• ** '•' . ,* . . » • * ; •• ^ , •. • ‘ * *■ *'. ‘ ••*. • *, ••••#. » • •• * *• *. . • - • 'v* * . ■ •• »'•••.••?• • ■» t *. I ■ « . » • **• I y• • • V' • • • »*. ■ V f, V , .' .1 I r* . • < 3r .• J ~ 4 *' 'iy m p *» • * f C- III h m :>A?S f < >» V. km it.- . f*^wjR^^T»iVV" ':f‘ • i ;' * a-r mm' V •♦ •• r.* ? ^ • •• l?sV-.Vr .•.*■«• •••• 4 «>>*... a p'%i' V»"'• •.-v '* »» • Vf’-'- K- *-3 •• • S«T ^ *» * ■ ^ y y* MBrtf Uv. lr^V:V'‘ ■ ’ • ‘ . • :i'-?A*;rt'."vr> '••• • • (d) t) >1 vvr-A v_—• '.** i.■ tj : V.. ».\-5jr5^;-A .. ■. «5*-.v.;;i.v-j • v •>‘>r./.’-yf’ V / *. . .* ,*. • *. * * ' * £i .- ■{ :• ;! 44 Sis !■ ■ j? i .1 I I ’ r-- «' w *“ "• V * - K I \‘K^ y*^f> rS:'!rf;aa ■ Vf H k T* '*? r*y^i5SS ?■ . V'^V-I A ••v-if-v. Im ItsmA ilSifefi > ** A*’ m s KM S}T 4- '*;:c h-r-ys 5 ^y^>i T '*•—/liS 'V. < ®S5'1;>V-amm. . .. •. * * • «■ •- . • • «• • - •••* •• « \ % • • • . • • *1 i f t A '■ 'rj ttj iv* t" »Tf? ••> ^ . • • V* * ■*• . '?'.■ • *\pyi |v.f .. t * *.. • V* t.v • . - _____ ■. ..• • I* * .N ^ • i * ’ *. :••* * f <: .! . ■ \ V “^‘V • 4 • *‘ l • • : • • * ;... •-••• •• .• ■; . » . f .- • / * . ■' V• - 'L.' ' iMi >v'#sfcssi '♦v r *4 'm> ^>1-5, *4^• • ■ / , .‘-v:.::r- .**••! .• I . i• -•.• *• • . • • • ,■^•> 4 • * / . .* '*5. . m'irti •. 4 11 • .»*•»# '** * t . , I • ' ... •• •• - :■ 1 ■ l,>i.<^.rv tl’^- " ;'.*.-A.‘v ;• -•^ rr • • *• • *•• •» ' • >• •. • ).•'1. f * •’* *>. * mm mm • • :• rfsfefc? r -*• . .• ** . . . .• • . * ’ •. • *•. * •* ._••.* • •• * o o T<^/N ,0^ W^lm W'r '^ ^ .* Mr€5:;w N.= * .■ » w ^ . y '"•■■■'■'■ 'C • • • • • 4 \ •, . •1-. ; > • /!i • • ’ ■•. •*; ,. . . • IM 1 * .Ot<sl - •/ •.* c- -V' '4'^^ ♦ . • . . : 1'. * ij] .. .•, ;* ’rr;^f: ; l■' .• •i-.k sil^ W-t:-: ! •, m:-:. \ • .#. • ‘ r • . • • • ‘ ‘ ^ •••*:.. r*♦ • . ? • V < . .* ‘ ♦ .* m *•* t • * V ' ' --------1 ■ I *. *4 Lot Are Lot Are 'M • • • :' ••• ■; •••••• rv,>' • » . ♦ •*, ’ •• -• * . . :•• ' • . • . •• • • ••;• • •.. * V*. •• . . i* ^• •;;'-••'•••. V-:v!V.; ' < . .*» ‘ *. • \ • .. -A'. • V. »• 4 t ,# •• * ** • • :< * •*.. * • • • * 1 * ...». %*V‘ ; . _ .« *• I >•*. /• ' t * ■*•*.:.* •* '*. • : . . I ^ ' ■ V: •• • ■Vv-?-.- • ■ ■ *‘s .iv ' . • .♦ ; s* • * .• • * *» •/ « .. •• • • m i » . ' * • • . *• • • •*. % .. .V * • •. . • • • -V .*• V > • . .wcV * •» « 4 i • • ■ . • • -***• • • •• *.• V* *. ‘ ‘ .*• • .. ;% . .. .* • • • • • i • \ • •jt • . i * \• * • • . •v.;'. >' . • , ^ i »• •• • • * ____!_ '^4 •f • ■ ' V.'. :f;'‘A j#iV-..................... HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS ;■ ■ I L . 'I ,*«s kmA ■i • T-. i ' ■> 0^ Exhibit F EXISTING HARDCOVER Lot Area = (65 x 85) + (10 x 85) +fll x 53) + (10 x 6) + (5 x 10) 2 ^2 2 Lot Area = 6,327 sf = 0.145 ac <- House « (24.7' x 26.5') + (11.7* x 20.2') = 891 sf Patio * (15' X 19') = 285 sf Gravel Apron * (12' x 26') « 312 sf Sidewalks = (3' x 24') + (2' x 28') + (2' x 9') + (3' x 4')== 158 sf Shed = 5' X 7' = 35 sf Total Existing Hardcover = .. 1,681 sf = 27% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _■) PROPOSED HARDCOVER House with garage = (47 x 31) + (23 x 27) = 2,078 sf Shed ~ 35 sf Driveway =(13x14)4 (4x5) roughly = 202 sf Rear Walk 3 X 21 = 63 sf Total Proposed Hardcover 378 sf 38% \ REVISED PROPOSED HARDCOVER House with Garage = (12 x 20) + (26.5 x 52.3) = 1,626 sf Driveway and entry sidewalk (16 x 15) - (3 x 12)* 276 sf Total Proposed Hardcover 17902 sf = 30% TES of THi C.D. WILLIAMS 1932 FAGERNESS VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARINC 7:34 - 7:50 P. 'uLi C.D. WILLIAMS 1932 FAGERMBSS POINT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:34 - 7:50 P.M. mm li-;‘ • ■ ■■ ■ '■ysWttV^ OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 21, 1984.PAGE *• • •• m C.D. Williams was present. Kent and Janet Dahlen of 1926 Fagerness Point Road were present from the audience. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the applicant is requesting to remodel and add on to the existing house which is within the 75* lakeshore setback. Gaffron stated that the property severely limited because of the hardcover. IS Kent and Janet Dahlen of 1926 Fagerness Point Road stated that there is a drainage problem affecting them and William's property. Dahlen submitted a letter noting their concerns. Kelley stated that he would not be in favor increasing the hardcover on this property. C.D. Williams stated that he would be glad to go upward rather than to increase the hardcover on the property. Rovegno stated that there are front setback, lakeshore setback, and hardcover problems on the property. Rovegno stated that the applicant shouldn' t exceed the existing hardcover. inSime stated that he would not approve any increase hardcover. Sime suggested tabling the application to give staff and applicant time to work with the proposal. Kelley moved, Callahan seconded, to table C.D. Williams variance application to allow staff and applicant time to work with the proposal. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). I-' _iV. , _L ITY of <Post Office Box 66 • Crystal i 'I C. D. Williams 2025 Nicollet Minneapolis, Mt NOTICE OF PL li ■ I Date of Meet Votes: Planning Comi _ _ _ App _ _ _ App _ _ _ App _ _ _ Den xyy Tab Tab No i NOTES AND S P! revised plan sh no less than 28 Applicai Applicar additior meeting for the In all cases, requested ini or the City v If the applic contact the 2 If you desi] they are av< and approval PAGE 3 ranet Dahlen of sent from the Lrator Gaffron le affidavit of I noted that the 3 add on to the 75* lakeshore property is cover. ess Point Road affecting them itted a letter i in favor of perty. Lad to go upward n the property. 3ackf lakeshore the property, dn' t exceed the any increase in he application work with the to table C.D. Llow staff and »osal. Motion, .• ■ *. m I ll ( •V . of ORONO Posl Office Box 66*CrysUl Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices Telephone 473-7357 f. i li l!% <: ijr i I hi Control No. 827 C. D. Williams 2025 Nicollet Minneapolis, MN 5540 XXX Variance _ _ _ Conditional Use Permit _ _ _ Subdivision, Preliminary Date of Notice May 24, 1984 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting _ Votes: 6 For May 21, 1984 __ Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval : As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting XXX Denial Tabled Tabled For reasons noted Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Application was tabled pending receipt of a revised plan showing no more than the existing 27% hardcover and setbacks of no less than 28* to the lake, 10* sides, and 13* front_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Council Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the June 18, 1984 meeting is June 11, 1984 for the or July 9, 1984 July 16 meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within ___________ or the City will consider the application as formally withurawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Administrator. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review and approval by the Planning Commission. irtiiiiiifiirtitill iiiWiiiiiVwiifca^.... ifiiiiMiiiitii r *.' .• • • •.-.. -. 827 nal Use Permit ion. Preliminary May 2^, 1984 ncil meeting om applicant 9 Commission receipt of a setbacks of ipt of I ttal of n. please Lssion Minutes )n review § Hr ‘ Y 'nv h i* iiMiiim TO:Planning Commission Members FROM:Michael P. Gaffton, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: July 13, 1984 #842 - Robert Zimmerman - 3415 Crystal Bay Road Variance Application - House addition on a lakeshore lot v^n-Sna District - LR-IC ~ one-half acre Variances requested - Side setback - hardcover Side setback variance Required - 10 * Existing - 9-10* Proposed - 8' Variance - 2* or 20% Hardcover variance ^ 75-250* setback area = 12,024 sq. ft. Allowed hardcover 25% » Existing harcover « 3,098 sq. Existing hardcover variance = sq. ft. Proposed hardcover = 4,805 -ica Proposed hardcover variance * 1,799 sq. ft. or 15% for an increase of 14% hardcover rinr"ri?bo^'l^i--yrres;;iU List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owner s i...st: Exhibit D - Old Survey IxSibit F : wchitec?s alternate paving proposals Exhibit G - Hardcover calculations Applicant is requesting to “ “fi^trdrivewty'Ipron^ ‘'iSe ^$i::"aldi?TlA cSStiniel ?he%xisting^sidewall which ^equ!r^.'°In't3lit!o:?'^ii;i Sa?dc??er proposed in the 75-250' zone is 40% compared to the existing 26% hardcover. #842 - July 13 Page 2 Please extensi this si and hoi: wide pc drivewc house, You wi] west s: and api on file lot, wl The ne. that tl proper side. Applic baseroe reacti not fo house hardco The Co neighb #842 - Robert Zimmerman July 13, 1984 Page 2 . J* ■ ! Please review Exhibit F, the architects proposed ““eratives to the extensive driveways required. J^°“^ited by^the property linethis site since lateral vehxcle lability is limited by tne prop ^ y and house structure so that a vehicle ^ could reduce proposed wide pads in going to the °°"i?-’'®esrside^o^ the driveway hardcover by up to 700 34%house, reducing the total proposed hardcover to 34%. YOU will note when you visit this ■''nlsf thfexirtinrhouse, west side of the house extends back about 50 pas survey and appears to be of -^-^ively recent have^a 1980 survey on file showing a proposed two-car aetacnea gatayc lot, which was apparently never constructed. l!de! Are^^ant should be requested to address these concerns. bale^nrdurto“itrelevation nea“ltke^leveu“^However“ my i>™»|diate Jt I t r i >; Cl I h»Aj, ' TT My.MX CITY OP ORO % VARIANCE Af PROPERTY LC Site Ac Proper! Please Please survey APPLICANT Name Mailin OWNER Name _ Mailin Date f I (do) PRESENT US Presex Presei DESCRIPTK Descr VARIANCES Setba Other Lves to the als to ine ne property line mse the 2-1.5* proposed ide of the 'el along the listing house, i 1980 survey 5 rear of the expressed concern off onto his rear and far oncerns. se has no my immediate rward, and d allow for a reases in in the proposal• % in this consistent. ^ J mSBH lit CITY OP ORONO % VARIANCE APPLICATION A Fee After-the-Fact exhibit ,00 ^ property location Site Address B>Arj (K1 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) —V? C>(l£^^ abstract or _ _Please check one — Is the property torrens?.. Please survey attach legal description to application if not included on required APPLICANT Name i?i)QlaTH "21 hHifl. Phone Mailing Address M OWNER Name i^eco±Phone ____ Mailing Address a MA l Date Property Acquired I g t (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property L/e-ic Ac Residential Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $ trroDESCRIPTION OP REQUEST jsstimarea Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ _ __ Lot Width Front Hardcover ide Rear) (over) *\ 0‘ f. t “■'-f'•V II / ):/'z/ / #Sfn/ //?#f ii..- 3STOfl T\ . --It. IS • r-19 (mX U FXl f »nvx !♦ M Q. • l&lss CZ3 LO CV! •v' • • •« :3 •~> .'S'; l&l tt ^ A S s ^ 2r >-i2 «:^SS2!S I > M M < ^ £8S~~S5^ * * s < fl H K U H *4 in K tt ^ ^ S l&l lA N M tt CM >• 10 «gg •J lU t&l <-5|S2“s|s£tt in 10 Q ::“oo| 10 s M tt CM lO H lU CM 10 so “S n lA *4 U M M to C SSwiAi) IXSSi'tfoooz a M s o « S « lO Ul lU ^ MtnettttinS Kieuo-«C .i. 55uk * b *> *0 in I fi t- iti &> sM itn Is o t ES & S M tt l&l 8 CO osMz u o lO 10 lO ■""sSsS^ -I o M < lO KiSgS-- CM 10 M 111 ^ h> tt ^ Z I tti. tt < r* ^ iJ tN «• tt ^ < e w to N S?"8 0 ^ tt CM O < 01 to q ^ H 3 •-« tt Ch S2 O 5 !< * Ch > to lO 10 to H CM 10 I >•____^ tt OH _ ^OU z r« lA M M ^ Ul < ^ ® >■ I « _J Ui 111 < □ < O «9 tt < SSoSS^jSI > Ul 111 <^g»«5; o* 10 10 h s I to o o QC O o •A O tt tt (M lU Ik Ik H tt O O i i-^j ''-4. r# 'V; 4 \ r. ' A!u \ • i • •Pi© <& m (01 (se ii •: ^'ja.RSsJIsii-Kmm.iI* ••• * 144 UK r.... f A I. JUN2 8I984 -Ml EXH/B{I June 26,1981 i Orono Building & Zoning Department: Encloaed find (l) print reflecting the most current paving plan for Mr. Robert Zimmerman*a proposed addition. Also find four sketches suggesting alternate paving details, addressing the city's con> cern of controlling runoff as veil as maintaining visual aesthetics. We intend to fully cooperate vith the city towards acheiving an acceptable solution. Thank you v/John frischmanJohn frischmann Partners U Design PARTNERS 4. DESIGN. INC. • 3S01 WEST SIXTY NINTH STREET • EDINA, MN. 55435 • (6121 927 4444 IN THE GALLERIA ' ' 'A I •v'. id 3R0F?rj 26.I98U n Sting con- 18 vith >n. ichnnnn k Design 12) 927-4444 %■ ' 1-0" JT- •■ 1 ■ »■-— / •» s ^ -------fe-'r: •'■: ir •'l* « .5.;.:T r. ^ -. > Pkifa^ 0''A:eu on P£m5T:*¥'T iOI'J e!rD:-ist t-=Sfi^TloyJ ■ _^f^5 ^^ETTr I'fe > \ r~TT“?^’rMs • I • *1 P3u^d cajc^.jjrERjs fuax f0W5 yinEt^) -^-■ - ^ ^ ^ :>r: ;V Om}"> Or^foit^K auw< V&J'O > •• / i: •!ri,|*|i|| (;. '. ,.t • • » 1• • •: 'i>■ ■ • r e V.. ,i:' • * - - ‘ ' • ., *i'.VT 1 TT, * 8' P^Cfnt ZA"*ZA'' <4-’ COtJC, OieorcK 'O'jzk : "* ■' ' f* IDSTROM OSTREIM ARCHITECTS, P.A. . 633 EAST LAKE STREET .WAYZATA, MN 55391 • <612)473-1011 'iM % 4 t i % I iM: -c? ■k^ Lot Area Allowable Existing house w detachei front g; side gr< sheds 8 Total = 3, Proposed h. house am new and « (Presumes i Total = A,i Verbally pi appear to a exhibit g* HARDCOVER CALCULATTOMfi Lot Area 0-75- ± 3,975 sq. ft. 75-250* ± 12,024 sq. ft. Allowable hardcover 75-250* - 12,024 X 0 25 Existing hardcover - 75-250 * house with attached garage 36* X 22* + liYi i .avoo side gravel driveway - 125'X10'+ = l 5sn*e„ 'ft. sheds 8-X14'-6'X6' i 148 ft: ' “* = 3,006 sq. ft. = 1,160 sq. Total = 3,098 sq. ft. or 26% Pressed hardcover - per architect's figures house and addition = 2,739 sq. ft. ^ ®® (Presumes re^il^al ’of^deSacted^garlge^aiid sheds) Total = 4,805 sq. ft. appear ^to'’alsl “bf fn''increase*in°hLdcoverf^“"®^°"® un)tnown, would TO: PROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PI Mi. Ju: «84 Application - Zoning Distri. Mst of Evh^ Exhibit A - , Exhibit B - j Exhibit c - ] Exhibit D - * Exhibit E - £ The appiica I’oplace it ' (not drawn the 2oni] connected t< Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover “ Max Applicant wc He is propos However, a 1 properties n wish to incl Based on the others we h of the lot a; Ho other var: performance i No hardcover that construe without a har 4itpWi4PBEiiM exhibit 160 sq. ft. lovm, would TO; EROM; DATE; SUBJECT; Planning Coamiission Members July 11, 1984 #343 - Jeffrey „lk„ . i,,, Application - Lot area and lot width Zoning District"-*LRl!ic*f'''*“‘* ^ance to construct a new home List of Evh<K.>- onu-half acre single family residentialList of Rxhibjte t ■ Application Exhibit c - Plat^to^ List ^mt E : V ;™~ «. M. 7j>*. to scale r»r» « y®^^—round home The r\ uininer cabin and Of the zoning Ifs^ric? survey) will JS^et J?? structure connected to it. ’ sewer is available .*'®<l"irement8• xne Old cabin is l*ot Area l^t Width Hardcover - Max. Requiref^ 21,780 sq. ft. 100» lfS88 sq. ft. (25%) Proposed 1/. , Variance10,100 sq. ft. C4« 50* 1*348 sq.ft. (21*)Applicant would be allowed 1 588’ sq.ft. ,21,, .!;* 1) ^ other variances approved following conditions- performance standards of t^e'zS^^nTSis%'?Lr‘’" other No _- -- -^wiling district «rner I No riAirdcovoir vsriAn r. *1^ -'.r O m « >1 r;*J ' ;;■?* W-' «Ti. Hi V-..K;r.r->' CITY OP ORON \ VARIANCE APP PROPERTY LOG Site Add Please at survey. APPLICANT Name Mailing i OWNER Name Mailing f Date Prop I (do) (d PRESENT USE 0 Present Z Present U DESCRIPTION O Describe VARIANCES REQI Lot Setback V« Other a new home intial cabin and -ructure luirements ^bin is Variance ) 54% 50% 250* zone, issary. ■ Park >es applicant cal of approval ng conditions: ther * on notice approved 'j '^i : Ip ••••■’ c.; ■ y n '■P •^K> i m Mm a Iv ■-W Li:, ’i' i’m.. CITY OP ORONO t VARIANCE APPLICATION#84 Application Fee $100.00 After-the-Pact Fee $200.00 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address RALOOg PArftiC Rh. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -3.3^ 3<4 OOt S" Please check one — Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required APPLICANT Name f\ UU^g Mailing Address iHao e<J<lu>- Ptr. Pi Phone OWNER Name ________ TokU C. UUt'U Ph^t^ (d 3 ^ O Mailing Address J.4o Rc^<;el-V < Hjs Hia . S5?ito«^ Date Property Acquire!^|95l (month/year) ^ (do) ^onoy also o^ the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property LR-tCL JIN 2 2 084 X Residential CITY OF ORONO ly' other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $5rO^OOO '^‘4^ -^vUv\a sumilki>r ~-i.% ^ UrvSO ifljp rvivv^^d) p¥v;i^ VARIANCES REQUIRED __ _Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Pront Hardcover Side Rear) (over) I > '■ ly •: n r ■•V tt; ^ '-A. •r > 4 W‘Wi M M a E J I H ^ QC K 3M ^ ^ to a 5 ? 25..SS5 < iu 2 ^ M OC CO o O 3 lU o O 3 3 S S ihs3 Kl 3 -J^9liJ o "> 3 ^ CO ^ ro S| 2 Oe ____ tn < lu 3 10 ^ K X M 9 lo10 5 u *i a caq q 3 I -j -j -> 3 N < S X a ly «• o £^ -> 3 I CO ^ < 40 lU O h- ^5J-5 s3 fiSizSZS S““ “5 25SSE “*M 2 CftI liJ s i M m < < 8oSJSJ®g 8 o S S S S g < ae S52u.^ ^ , lyIL lu & c iiffS >0.00 fo B S ^ < jg a lur*l § ^ ^ ^ tt 111 S lu s s ^ VSggBf^ < uj lu 5 g o <D M ^ tf § 5 r 2 ^ss^:;s3 «s *4o ^ ^ a“-c «SzM Q F N < O a Ki lA H d M io 2 g-» € e N o p *** < -S'S|2J$f M S e i£ 05 «“■ .^573!:s Ul lA> e < . *A3“» lU (O ss<» u u e S<* a M r §is! >? \ fiSI CM IT)lUu M O > IM ft (O lU < 10 l&J g§ ro CM IK IM si I CO U M CO iyu M s S§S CO CM •O CM I 10 lUus:s ft CO Hi < 10 Ul O SiJ g° & y Io u _ U M < CL ft ^•OIU M 2 i HI H IM Ik ^ M In IM ^ sSSSSS! ysscvSN < li. II. lAj ^ CO < < 10 • M V) S Z8^33"» = ssi;9;3 SS55'®®'M S 8 E si S IM CMKl 10IM U > IM ft CO IM < CO IM CJ §8 10 CM IM 2 y < ft ft ««}“ CO 10 s IM H CO IM > IM ft CO IM < CO IM CJ ggM lO CM I N U _ U M y I CO o"S 3*S S §§g to CM N CO 8 iU g gE IM < >? N IM CO •I I M 8“ ^ Ok; o®B bSj. w 2 OT z ^ Kl ♦ ^ tj ui as m ^QjgwiciA ~ P >: g rl 7 .-§!CD CD CO P O CM «i S 10 Z CM N CO 10 2 ^ g O- ft 10o ^ *5 «“• w g 73 to iC 2 gii 8 T gp3IM «J CO Z § w2^5»^zs*ssiSSaSli §SS9fer IIS CA>n&rr s f 3 CVI CVI ®l ? oro CJ ............A V ' > •' • / 1 *%■ ! - I her*) of th« exisiii or tnec Soalo: Datt t o 1 Ho. Ip Certificate of Survey for Jeffrey 1)^ Ulku of Lot 11, block 1, Uldur Perk H^dDWIifr^ . ;l-X, X JUN?2I984 CITY OF QRQNO ^ «bL|^ XA- •a.^* K H^o’ ■ 0""i: o Of the ^undeJies^of^llt^ii|*i;J^^ •^ «®**«ct representation of a survey •xisting buildings thereon/lt does^iot DurLrt*^ti *'*** oi “ *11 or encroachments, other than an exlstinK^^^. J J^iv^r ° ^P>*'>vemenU 1 inch - kO feet *toy 31, lyfll* Iron marker GORDON R. COTTIN CO., HiC, long l«ice, tUnneaota immmrn ‘ -i- t r ; 1 ti. :■ y • a a I hereby i of the boi existing ] or eneroa< . Scale* 1 lA Dote t Nay ; • » Iron Mitouir F’ :>4 ■mig^HD^Igfr^ JUM?2I984 lYDF ORONQ Mlx^ 3kju< <Cfc- O f • aurvty >n of all roveme nta , iwc. • **o. l?755 **^yora :n s jn^ ■; •• , <•>■-■ ! Er fct.’-: ••H'3 f- • a 1^. ..'■•*> V <^T ^®r^ificatp€ of Survey for Jeifrey D* Ulku ol tot 11, block 1, fcaldur Park CITY OF ORQhfn 4- £TO >'7J' 3*7iTO p*/<.a rr-vf £• '. ^dxzcj //rcce jb^O S ^ C*'^'*''j^L. r ^0& f !V^; "* itXa^’^w^ o^“ JUjjt JL^ |yt«<V|wvQJLq (»^U^RsfekA-< eCfc- K H^o’ ^5-0 s:f. ««^ ^yr O n: O d>TTJ^ /4g^ existing buildings theracn/lt doe- iot location of all^ or .nero.eh».„t,. „u..r i<^Pr^tLoU S^ot lUirt-tofe,t, Hty 31, lyjj, • I Iron Marker ^o-y^' 27iro s ,f. ■7 j --2so‘ 6. %tt) s\4. OORDOK R, COFFIN CO., IRC. ig . -------------- noi| fyUf^li fiJirJJ* Oronberg Hag. ho. 12755 (r^rp » /x~gg> ^ j D CITY OF OROl PLEASE FILL NAME (pleas 1* JuV\ ^ 9^0£ 11.Alid 12. 14. Ltt3cl^ ^ 17 ■ 18 • ALL/bte^ r-1 1 9 .(yhiuAliieP. 2°^---------------^ IMI/’2I984 F ORONO €D -C-^- •kvtfcC-/-vf£ ' '- jO^Osl, r 20 A I I r.c- PUBLIC ATTENDANPR CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE please fill out the information requested below for our city records. NAME (please print)ADDRESS APPLICATION NUMBER/NAME PRESENT FOR 1.^g.Ei3/^/C lf^6oC^ I=ir^ <C/<:^/= •i:— 2.g.<.y>l7tS Lt^l.k»JC> 6.oih i^d ^^0 ^.........f^Sc. ■■^33PI ____’4a I jj(a=l 1; \/0£^^nT7/Y Mf/UAAj 133^mJ 1^0 so, SezueS •Vi±_Ufl=ti?5_----------------1 So* 2?< iijc^n.-fc. ] <^F//= dtt<^4ri m BAlQTifi PAHii t^ »L>ttjol ^ ln4-( t^((p B*%4sMjtAC^ I2J q{ Sxh // ^ ^Vo >Jeo/ f^u4oA > *• Uv I W: i I 4 u > ■f ■j'^4 CITY OF ORONO PLEASE FILL OUT NAME (please pi 1^ 2.^*nvir A/. 2/ . J.Fri^cAfnAi^ <<Ora^ 5 . / J /^b//A^L 6. o/> A0 -< X3- ^ 8.1 l_l»Ur4 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. TE RECORDS. ON NUMBER/NAME r FOR ^33n oJei\^#-gCih ’ ^ =#9^40 Oeo/ iVi' % Vj i 'i?'f' •H 4 ! 1^ if f ■ifeL. I, lA- f # .^:~. n f ■A PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE L. PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS APPLICATION NUMBER/NAME PRESENT FOR (J_ 2/<»•>< oy\y/z/»>n4^1,3^/ .J.frlschmAt_________ k^OuJ/ A/ ll.NA.r4 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. -i ’^L. /SA^ (U> S€f ii 2-S' yr/jt. 21S^J1=S:£l£lA iiz. ^ , .c -»240 ^ ' 24"^J>4& <?’35- <f ari5:'- kV. ••jJ I * HI*i ^ m ‘ iiJ*' in y p |l:t flliiis t||5 IfsJIlit! Iiiaii!tsll!”~|5rhtll! H\\\ «» |» M «♦ «U.S;1| ilftiSi, ifSiU C •• W H* V> 6 0»* rib!!- !?!ts;e-r^ritf* hS5||« • ;iis2l MJIJ Jbr» ------- I , Jr'^Z^ 8- - n5 ri® 5 1 .'o-n X 1^ '''' f« O 30o Li^ \Bi: I PWaUMIMAKV MCAOIN& 4 OKAINAOC.rr PSEPAB.CD POK14-- ^ lldl Jl t 1 PRC.N6U hectic.NED DAYTON M' :’^- i>ucv »Cjf?V / t »* I / a'» 0 U f U O T Bl ^s4 (i ! mmi wf mt 9BM nmm mmmm) mmm •'■ ^ ? i » j» i»'— »i T FKEKiCU CCEE.IC. BQ&D f-~^ ■-- 4lik.,'r^ 4 4-, FltC.NC14 ClteE.hC ORIVB h^->‘.'r.:^-i |*v“ 4^ Vm‘| • tKliSi T —h S.iT'S,-' ts.fi'i&l k i i ’] MMM:?........ ' ife —i ^ * ^' ^— 1 1^^-i -vrr:r 5 :i I 5 II i I . . ,i i i i i i I i 14 i» It PeCNCU CREE.IC Sheet No. I of I Sheet* ilMitW I r'if 0?\v >•■■• > )’)S. V Mi • Hi T-ti 8 r~- / V4.^ \ ■;" Vs: «i. ! . ^ A’'^1 ! > I I >•!' / I ' \|. :/^.' s»' ! ',-\-^ ltr. K "‘ l‘ ''i WW^i'mi 4,»x#' ^ '0 ^ •' J-i :~r ) r:'7‘A^s^ ’■r /'--f I y'' 5!i-' i.*J-Li*^' 1/ /• 4,0^.(7^ '^/l^‘"‘irV. jN? • • to'' *'' / - 5;:» K ? / / f'/ f % '■•/ /7 IV ir. V!>vy■m •;V•(L>77 % If..,, ri|i|iP i. l i i .1- / i" .■i A ■ill-:•"y > ,.4 » ii ■x, X.':e \ X '■—^ I < » >t’ < V i! \\ \ L\ !H T|y V 1 ^ il^iii^iil 5 WiV^JS?1 lip ^ ii iilr « /» m I -Q H^ff,'V Cw'S-Msr. i i .X 9 •/i /( /' y . *"] msiss !|! t^lf I 1 i!I • \i !■si i-i» it Ms’isli '.,^V V. 'r,g .’>§ f! i I fl -•'* I V ► Mpi!liY!!j i'l'iiiWijir^