The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-13-2023 Septic ComplianceMINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance inspection report form CONTROL AGENCY p p p 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/fiilestwq-wwists4-31a pdf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 15 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: 3111823330014 Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Property address: 4680 Bayside Road Orono 55359 Owner/representative: Michael Sletten Owner's phone: Brief system description: Pre -cast Septic tanks and above grade drainfield System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 7/13/2023 ® Compliant — Certificate of compliance* (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. ❑ Noncompliant — Notice of noncompliance An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncompliant - local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations (2) 1000 gallon pre -cast septic tanks, (1) 1000 gallon pump tank, and a 10X50 Rockbed drainfield. Pump tanks every 3 years. Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions duling system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the pu e o ssing this form. Business name: Chip's a tic.8 Certification number: 4761 Inspector signature: License number: 2064 (This doc ent has been electronically signed) Phone: 952-200-3176 Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) ® Soil observation logs ❑ Locally required forms ❑ Tank Integrity Assessment ❑ Operating Permit ❑ Other information (list): https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 1 of 4 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System discharges sewage to the ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Other: ground surface ® Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes` ® No tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes' ® No dwelling or establishment. Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: Ran pump to determine hydraulic loading of septic system and found it to function fine at the time of inspection. 2. Tank integrity — Compliance component #2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System consists of a seepage pit, ❑ Yes' ONO ® Pumped at time of inspection cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit? Sewage tank(s) leak below their ❑ Yes` ® No designed operating depth? If ves, which sewage tank(s) leaks: Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Chip's Septic Name of maintenance business: Sevices License number of maintenance business: 2064 Date of maintenance: 7/13/2023 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mm/dd/yyyy): (must be within three years) (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 8 (1)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary — explain below) ❑ Other: Tanks were camera inspected at found to be ok at the time of inspection. Pump tanks every 3 years. https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 2 of 4 3. Other compliance conditions — Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes` ® No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? *Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Fixed electrical box and wires Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Not applicable ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes, ® No 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ® No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ® No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit (Attach) ❑ https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service tAvailable in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 3 of 4 S. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 Date of installation 6/30/1995 (mm/dd/yyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food beverage lodging? Compliance criteria (select one ❑ Unknown I ►� 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, ® Yes ❑ No* and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfield has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 5b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* ❑ Yes [--]No* 5c. "Experimental, "Other', or "Performance" ❑ Yes ❑ No* systems built under pre -2008 Rules; Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. *Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Used soil probe to complete soil borings and inspect mound Attached supporting documentation: ® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical separation (Attach) ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) ❑ 24 inches of sand under rockbed. Indicate depths or elevations A. Bottom of distribution media 24 inches of sand B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 12 inches L;. 5 stem separation 36 inches D. Required compliance separation* I 24 inches *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law httPs://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 4 14GSO 8�Cy Kd . Owner / project: Address / PID: Soil Observation Log www.SeDticResource.com vers 12. Owner Information 4680 Bayside Rd, Orono Date 7/12/2023 Soil Survey Information ❑ refer to attached soil survey Parent matl's: 0 Till ❑ Outwash ❑ Lacustrine ❑ Alluvium ❑ organic ❑ Bedrock landscape position: ❑ Summit C] Shoulder ❑ Side slope R Toe slope soil survey map units: slope % direction- downhill Soil Log #1 ring ❑ Pite' Elevation Depth to SHWT Depth (in) Texture fragment % matrix color redox color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50firm moderate prismatic platy Ict— / rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain CL friable weak granular blocky >50 / /� �Z firm moderate prismatic platy massive rigid strong <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky P i . ZAw >50 %� firm moderate prismatic platy massive rigid strong <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive Comments: 4680 Bayside Rd, Orono Soil Log #2 ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Elevation Depth to SHWT Depth (in) Texture fragment % matrix color redox color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky LI>50 d y2 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky 1 I CL >50 ��/� firm moderate prismatic platy rigid Strong massive <35 IOOSe friable IOOSe weak single grain blocky 35-50 granular C �— >50 .5' �0 �i �i/ firm moderate prismatic platy massive rigid strong <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive 4680 Bayside Rd, Orono Soil Log #3 ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Elevation Depth to SHWT Depth (in) Texture fragment % matrix color redox color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky firm moderate prismatic platy >50 rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive 1 hereby certify this work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local reqs. `�7� Chip Septic Servies LLC 2064 Designer ignature Company License # CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. ADDRESS DATE CAIIEDIN �. - y s SCHEDULED COMPLETED TIME W ne T ydjl �Y/ORIt SA1i5FACTORY PNOCEEG Q CORRECT WORK S PTIOCE to W O CORRE...CTWORK. CALL FORREINSPECTION V BEFORE, COVERING CORRECT UNSAFE CON0111ON WITHIN HOURS 04SKCTOP Witt RETURN SIOPORDERPOSTED CALL INSPECTOR INSPECTION NEO UIRE0 CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS PROJE C T COMPL E T E ISSUE CERTIFICATE N' OCCUPANCY TEMPORARY PERMANENT PHOTOTAKEN CITATION ISSUED Cai1 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473-7357 OwnerlConti Inspector. _.. i ftw CcRYllnswcW*s FIM Canary Ca01118ft IlMl' OWNERS s. r:?" l 1 CONTR.: TELEPHONE NO. DESCRIPTION _ !� { t ✓� -� ' l4 O1 FOOTING, 11 ME04MCALRI 19 EXCAViGRA[MNCaTIILING 07 cPA)vvw: 13 MECHANICAL FliAl. 19 LAKESHORENVETIANDS 0 03 INSULATION 2425 WOOD BURNER FIREPLACE :U TREE REMOVAL 03 WALL BD 17 WATER ►+OOK UP 11 SITE INSPECTION 05 FINAL 13 SEWEIA HOOc-UP 06 PROGRESS OT DEPAO v SITE ?1 SEPTIC "NT 11 En1.fPLAIAIT 01 DEMO - FITW PTiC INSTAL` 71 FOLLOW UP 09 PLUMBING RI 73 Si'PT1CTilplt-- `IS HARD COVER REMOVAL v 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION=REMOVAL OWMEMCONTRACTOR TO MEET SES __.. PW 4 0 r cc -�— UJ 'yQ _ 1.: W ne T ydjl �Y/ORIt SA1i5FACTORY PNOCEEG Q CORRECT WORK S PTIOCE to W O CORRE...CTWORK. CALL FORREINSPECTION V BEFORE, COVERING CORRECT UNSAFE CON0111ON WITHIN HOURS 04SKCTOP Witt RETURN SIOPORDERPOSTED CALL INSPECTOR INSPECTION NEO UIRE0 CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS PROJE C T COMPL E T E ISSUE CERTIFICATE N' OCCUPANCY TEMPORARY PERMANENT PHOTOTAKEN CITATION ISSUED Cai1 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473-7357 OwnerlConti Inspector. _.. i ftw CcRYllnswcW*s FIM Canary Ca01118ft IlMl' DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCMEDULED M ! 1 PERMIT NO. '? ` `' ` I 1 CEJ M � /^7 s TELEPHONE NO. 7 DEWRIPT10N �r Al t8 ExCAV%GRA01NGwFiLLING W 0i FOOTING t1 µfCNANK:AL 19 KESNOAf,`WEtLANDS UA !k 02F RAMt(VG 1 T MECHANICAL FINAL RAMI ?17S WOOD EFITIREPLACE Yt TAtE REMOVAL y OS TFC)N Q 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE 06KCTx)#t 2 04 WALL 80 , t SEWER HOOK ua 0H P1� FESS Q 0005 FINAL SEPTIC A1NT ?t COMPLAINT �77 O7 DEMO - SITi: 12 FOLLOW-UP �.i "J 07 DEMO - FtNAl :!5 "ARD COYER AtMOVAL 09 PLU1ri$ING Rt 73 SEPTIC FINAL :ki FOl/NOAT tREWVAL 10 PLUMBIttG F114AL J 2 L4 N OWNEWCONTPACTOA TO MEET 2 COMMENTS: a ¢ Q 0 _. Cc 0 w W Q L L' W / PROJECT comPLETE 0 0 Wp W`tK WISFACTORY PROCEED W4 ISSUE CEATIFICAT' OF OCCUPANCY 0; COitRECT VJORK A PROCEED TEMPORARY Q CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION PERMANENT BEFORE COVERING - O SAFE CONDITION WITIHN NO7URS PHOTO TAKEN C.ONRECT UN INSPECTOR Wrt,L RETURN CITATION ISSUED STOPOJ( tnPOsTED CALL IW-.-KCtOR INE pE(;11ON AtOLARED CALL TO ARNANGE ACCE`I Cad lor the next in"mclion�24 hours in advance. 473.1357 ownerrCor Inspector: wme CaptAnSv Cw** FMe DOWNSLOPE DIKE 'WIDTH If landslope is 3`l6 or more, subtract rock Dyer width from adsorption width to obtain minimum downslope dike toe Z4 ft- /y ft = __J l- _ f t Calculate mound height at edge of rock layer on downsloF? side; a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock layer: Separation Z feet 1:). Multiply rock layer width by landslope to determine drop in elevation; Slope Difference X. c. Add depth of clean sand depth of dean sand for separation at downslope edge to depth of rock layer to depth of soil backfill to get mound height at downslope edge of rock layer; Z ft + . 4- ft + _1— ft*__ftft d. Enter table on page E-18 with landslope and downslope dike ratio. Select dike multiplier of 4.7G� e. Multiply dike multiplier by downslope mound height to get downslope dike width. -I.7(.- ;tc �- - Z/ ft g. Compare the values of step G.1 and Step G.21. Select the greater of the two values as the dov%•nslope dike width; Z/feet h. Calculate upslope dike width using upslope mound height and upslope dike multiplier from page E-18; a4sx_ - =I-+— ft i. Total mound width is the sum of upslope dike width plus E-20 ar1� . tirwa.. a� w.� swu ..W Woks ua 4 rQ Ulww• aa...wa 1N Dw.�r•fr a... -d . rock layer width plus downslope d►ke width; If I :tlR+-if - ft+ /� ft- -qt!s- ft Z6�q/r sc�r14 * Iq 3. If landslope is 2.9 percent or less, basal width includes both the- upslope heupslope and downslope dike widths. a. Calculate downslope dike width using steps G.2.a. through G.21; _ feet b. Calculate upslope dike width using upslope mound height and dike multiplier from Page E-18; x h= ft c. Add downslope dike width to upslope dike width to rock layer width Et+ h+ ft= ft F.1 R 1.1 al wn3 oppe fl al 71 ,1 •1 !1 ♦1 73 at IL.o•pr 0 !D a0 fD •D 79 is !11 an tD !Y 7a am U 741 1 1 )A ,31 a17 2s 3�► s36 US 4A2 751 all ,71 2S0 ,ri aS• 4.311 is fO ala 11+1 a10 •at 3 ,30 til S �. 631 732 7M 11• !? 27f 2M ,S7 %A 417 an !J6 •o• -3 UI )s) _ ._ fm 4a7 IS, 16.-7 2L1 333 am 1A 4A!30 a.at 4," 471 fa1 • 7 ,Y fY It 11 7la fM •y 10.1• 12.07 127) 2.,a tA1 1.37 !l7 !]0 lm am I a ,10 ,af f� a.0 1S.fa 11!1 141 ,l0 1Y ,.f7 f$ as Ifo a.a• a30 •Y •af 1 10 aSl aY •'.1' •L7 •171 160 1104 Ifo' Sall 2211 2K 2.31 2M ,33 IZ ,11 ♦12 )a! aY a3• ll ala 714 11 IS 17aS )oaf at270 136 2.71 ,.T3 )17 !H )= 40412 /N 7a1 12.f0 2117