Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE 1 — 1 CITY COUNCIL IX PLANNING COMMISSION PARK COMMISSION OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request Please complete the following information for City Records Name (please print) Address Present for (from agenda) Name or Number - e 1. '*.°J'A1 fir.es-, z5 1�;>-,�5,�, ,�'t�v L. -3 Z, 2. 1\ D � L `"t�(11,(Z, 0,at Cry" Z1 Off_ 1r�i l Li-rz 445 19014 1 3. C 441 hi. /4/),--it, 67? 6 lirf A "' i it 4. Civri 26 5. ok z t.d xt SSC1 DX-r-K J � 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, July 17, 2023, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the Agenda items is available on the City website (www.oronomn.gov) under Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet — located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Richard Crosby Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: June 20, 2023 Public Hearings: 1. LA23-000005 Hagen Landscape, 2699 Kelly Avenue, requests a conditional use permit to reconstruct a seawall within the floodway district. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 2. LA23-000032 Paul Skoog, 250 Tonka Avenue, requests variances for lot area, lot width, and rear yard setback to construct a new home. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 3. LA23-000033 Edwin & Tracey Stephenson, 559 Park Lane, an average lakeshore setback variance in order to expand an existing lakeside deck. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Other Items: Update on July 10, 2023 City Council meeting. Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to August 14 2023 City Council meeting: Chris Bollis Sign up for email notifications at www.oronomn.gov — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Acting Chair Jon Ressler, Commissioners Dennis Libby, Jon Ressler, Bob Erickson, Gary Kraemer and Ted Schultze, alternate. Chair Chris Bollis and Commissioner Mark McCutcheon were absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Natalie Nye. Acting Chair Ressler called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. OATH OF OFFICE Community Development Director Oakden administered the Oath of Office to Ted Schultze, alternate planning commissioner, who was immediately seated. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 15, 2023 Libby moved, Erickson seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of May 15, 2023. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA22-000064 LEBRISIA IVERSEN, 4448 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS VARIANCES FOR AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK, 75' LAKESHORE SETBACK, HARDCOVER TO EXCEED 25%, HARDCOVER WITHIN THE 75 -FOOT SETBACK AND SIDE YARD SETBACK. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is proposing a house addition on the north side of the home. The property is substandard in size at .46 acres when the LR 1B district requires a one -acre minimum and the lot is a unique shape, she said. The existing one-story home is non conforming and does not meet the required LR -1B setbacks or the required Lake setbacks. The 75 -foot Lakeshore setback and average Lakeshore setback lines run through the middle of the existing home. The expansion that is proposed is entirely in front of those setback lines. The property is also currently over the hardcover limitation of 25 percent at 27 percent. The plan improves hardcover slightly but not below 25 percent. The requested addition requires variances from the average Lakeshore setback, 75 -foot Lakeshore setback, hard cover to exceed 25 percent, hard cover within the 75 -foot setback and side -yard setback. The applicant is proposing a two-story addition with a rooftop terrace over the second story. Nye said staff agrees with the practical difficulties present and can support the construction of an addition, but recommends denial of the addition as proposed. Staff believes the proposed height creates a vertical encroachment and could impact neighboring lake views and that several doors exiting the addition are shown but not the entry landings or patios, so hardcover may actually be increased over what is proposed. The planning commission should discuss the application and consider if the variances requested are reasonable and in character for the neighborhood, she said, specifically the height and hardcover. The applicants and the general contractor were present. Page 1 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler asked about setbacks. Nye said the application slightly increased side -yard setback but staff is not concerned about that as much as the height and hardcover. The building would not be any closer to the lake. Andrew Iverson, 5558 North Shore Dr., said they are stuck in a unique property between the lake and a busy road. He said they have gotten approval letters from several of the neighbors concerning the height increase and the plan would not block any neighbor's view. They are alongside a channel and close neighbors face the lake. He said they wanted the rooftop terrace because they lack a lot of sunlight due to mature trees and saw it as a safe play space for their children since there is a lake on one side and a busy road on the other. They would also plan a rooftop garden. Windows on the front were converted to doors but the family hasn't used them because they go straight to the lake which is unsafe for children, and for that reason, they don't plan stairs. They noted they were within the 30 -foot height restrictions and also don't have a basement. The applicant pointed out another house in the area with a rooftop terrace that he feels encroaches a great deal more. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. There were no public comments. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. Ressler asked about grade for the height, noting that the road is higher than the property. Nye said the grade is figured from the base of the house, not the road. Erickson asked to see the illustration of the actual proposed addition. He said he was concerned about the height issue for other properties and that the proposed height seems to magnify the setback issue. Schultze asked if the addition could block the view of the lake of people across the road. The applicant explained that the direct view is of the channel. Kraemer said he feels like this falls into the best they can do. He understands the staffs concern about height but noted that neighbors are not in objection. Ressler said he usually likes to side with staff but the lot is almost unbuildable and the applicant has the support of neighbors. He expressed concern about hardcover staying below the applied amount but said he would support the application because it is going up on a structure that is already there. He would not want to see any further side -yard encroachment. Iverson said when they purchased the house they removed a significant amount of hardcover and there is another old walkway they could remove. Libby said he still sees a problem in that there has not been an establishment of practical difficulties that warrants so many variances. He said he was thinking more in the spirit of the codes and how they are enforced. Page 2 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Erickson said he was concerned about the increase of height in the 75 -foot setback. He said the City has been consistent about that. Libby suggested the commission provide feedback instead of an approval or denial but said there were too many elements to focus on just one. Kraemer moved, Schultze seconded, to approve LA22-000064 Lebrisia Iversen, 4448 North Shore Drive, variance requests. VOTE: Ayes: 3, Nays 2 (Libby and Erickson). 2. LA23-000022 MICHAEL CLARK, 565 LEAF STREET, REQUESTS A VARIANCE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A NEW ACCESSORY BUILDING STREETWARD OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING. City Planner Nye provided information stating the applicant is proposing to construct a new accessory building to be used as a garage and an accessory dwelling unit streetward of the principal building. Accessory buildings are required to be placed to the rear of the principal building or home so a variance for the placement of the new building is being requested. The existing home is placed towards the rear of the property which limits the ability to construct an accessory building in a compliant location, she said. There are also topographical limitations that do not allow for the expansion of the existing attached garage. The new accessory building meets all other building setbacks, hardcover and lot coverage requirements, Nye said. Staff recommends approval of the variance request as applied with the addition of one condition that all accessory dwelling unit ADU performance standards must be met, including a covenant, which should be executed at the time of building permit. The applicant's architect or contractor was present and available for any questions. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. There were no public comments. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. Schultze asked about the accessory dwelling unit on the second floor. Nye said the first floor would be a garage and the second would have a bathroom and some living space. The applicant would have to execute a covenant when they take out the building permit stating they would not rent it out. Erickson moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000022 565 Leaf Street, variance request conditional that all ADU performance standards must be met including a covenant. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000023 BOB RENAUD WITH MINNESOTA GREEN, 1856 SHADYWOOD ROAD, REQUESTS A 75' LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE. City Planner Nye said the applicant is requesting a setback variance to replace a retaining wall within the 75 -foot Lakeshore setback. The proposal is to replace a failing timber retaining wall that is supporting a large tree with a boulder wall. The change in material requires the application for a variance. The Page 3 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. neighbor supports the application. Staff recommends approval with the conditions to require screening of the newer retaining wall where feasible in order to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake and that all work to construct the walls be contained on the subject property. Or if that's not possible, that written permission is submitted with the building permit from the abutting neighbor at 1860 Shadywood Road for any construction or grading work that occurs outside of the property boundary. Bob Renaud, MN Green Landscaping, 327 Marschall Road, Shakopee, reiterated that the main goal was to save the tree and build a wall that will last longer than the current one. Libby asked about past dumping by the wall. Renaud said there was no contamination. What was dumped was yard waste that was organic material that eventually rotted through the timber wall. He said the tree was a red oak and they would not be excavating around the roots but simply removing the old wall. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. There were no public comments. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. Ressler said staff had done a good job and the goal of preserving the tree before it was too late for mitigation would be something that most would support. Libby asked about erosion barriers. City Planner Oakden said those would be required as part of the permitting process. Erickson commented that boulders are natural so perhaps a high level of screening is not necessary. Kraemer moved, Schultze seconded, to approve LA23-000023 Bob Renaud, Minnesota Green, 1856 Shadywood Road, request for A 75' lake setback variance with the conditions set by staff. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 4. LA23-000024 SARAH & KEVIN REVERING, 1960 FOX RIDGE ROAD, REQUEST A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR AN ADDITION. City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicants are proposing a small 350 square foot garage addition on the west side of the home connecting to the existing attached garage and accessible to the existing driveway. The property is a corner lot situated on Brown Road South and Fox Ridge Road. The existing home is set back 56.9 feet from Brown Road. The garage addition on that side would result in a 46 -foot setback because the home is angled with respect to the property line, she said. That small portion of the addition would require a front setback variance. Practical difficulties include a wetland and a septic treatment area on a portion of the lot making that part unbuildable. No public comment has been received. Staff recommends approval of the variances. Page 4 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Sarah and Kevin Revering, 1960 Fox Ridge Road, the applicants, also pointed out that it is difficult to locate anything on the lot because of the wetland and septic culvert. They said they had spoken to all their neighbors and no one voiced any objection to the plan. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. There were no public comments. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:07p.m. The Commissioners discussed the item. Ressler said, again the problem was the building envelope and the positioning of the property, adding there doesn't seem to be anywhere else for this to go. Kraemer also said it looked like a good addition. Schultze said he appreciated the effort to go back as far as they could with the addition. Kraemer moved, Schultze seconded, to approve LA23-000024, 1960 Fox Ridge Road, request for front yard setback variance for an addition. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 5. LA23-000025 REVISION LLC, 165 CRISTOFORI CIRCLE, REQUESTS VARIANCES TO PERMIT AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY STREETWARD OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING. City Planner Curtis said the applicant is proposing to construct an accessory garage with a footprint of 1400 square feet in front of the home on the property. The building is considered to be an oversized accessory building or an OAB in the code. The applicant proposes to construct the garage 72 feet from the front property line. The home is situated 142 feet from the front property line, she said. It would meet the required principal building setback but an accessory structure cannot be an OAB, Curtis explained, so a variance is needed to construct the proposed garage that size in the current location. Staff finds viable alternatives for this project that would conform to the ordinances and not require variances. These include reducing the garage to 1,000 square feet or moving it further north on the property. Staff recommends denial of the application as applied. Peter Antonenko, 165 Christofori Circle, the applicant, explained why they chose that location for the garage. To the north behind the pad for the asphalt there is the existing septic, he said. Going to the west would have meant removing a lot of trees and bringing in dirt. To the south there is a geothermal field. The location selected requires the least amount of tree removal. The existing home does not have much storage in relation to the mechanical. The size of the garage was designed for extra storage for seasonal items and kids' seasonal sports equipment and bikes, he explained. The driveway configuration would make it difficult to park cars when the kids are old enough to drive in a few years. They said they only have three neighbors and they are in favor of the plan as it doesn't block anyone. John Daly, Revision LLC, Wayzata, said he worked with the applicant on the project. He said it is about a 2.5 acre site. The lot appears to be large but it is pushed back quite a ways from the street view and there is a large hill. There is still a significant amount of front yard. The home and the structure can't be seen from the street. He said he looked at the reason for ordinances such as the view and impact on the Page 5 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. neighbors and felt those concerns don't apply here. Also, this protects the majority of trees on the property and they were interested in being good stewards of the environment. Libby said he had visited and would call it an estate setting in that it is very private. He asked why they approached their storage needs as an accessory structure rather than as an addition to the house. Daly explained they felt this approach served all the needs better including extra cars and turnaround. The applicant said part of the intent was to be able to have the snowmobile trailer inside rather than sitting outside on the property. He said the house itself was already a little larger than they wanted so they didn't want to plan an addition to the house. He also said living in the country he prefers larger vehicles. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. There was no public comment. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Ressler asked how the City came up with the 1,000 foot standard for oversize accessory buildings. Curtis said over -sized buildings to the front of the building, the streetward side, did not use to be permitted but a change was made several years ago to permit them in rural areas. She said they would be permitted to build a structure that size if it were behind or even with the house. Oakden noted that the 1000 square foot building was limited and it was intended to make sure it was a relatively smaller building and that the main footprint and the principal building stayed as the larger mass structure on the on the site as intended to maintain that principal look. Libby said the intent of the ordinance was to not have intrusive structures too far out toward the road. But this is a unique circumstance, he said, where it does have the appearance of being quite a significant piece of property. He added it would be defeating this family's needs by pulling 400 feet out of the building that they need to have. Moving it to the back of the house would be impractical. He said he would be in favor of the application. Kraemer said he agreed with Commissioner Libby, noting that there are obstructions on the back of the lot. He said if they are limited to 1,000 feet the City would just end up with snowmobile trailers and other vehicles outside. Erickson said he had served on the ordinance committee as well and in 10 years of serving on the Long Lake and Orono Planning Commissions he can't remember any time when an applicant was approved for a variance when he had two avenues to conform to the ordinance. He said most of the practical difficulties were not met. He pointed out the applicant was asking for a building 40 percent larger than the ordinance. Libby pointed out they were asking for 1,000 feet less than they could build if they built it behind the house. Ressler said he did not think the request was egregious but the City does have its code to follow. Page 6 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Libby said in general terms accessory buildings standing out in front of the primary structure, where they're highly visible and the size and the appearance of those buildings can be offensive to the general public, that the thought process of limiting to 1,000 square feet or having to put it in the back of the building makes sense. Libby said in this case even though it doesn't conform to code it is worthy of granting the variance, because nobody's going to see it. Commissioners discussed whether any conditions should be put on a motion for approval regarding grading and preserving trees. Ressler said if the application is denied it doesn't mean it stops. It would go on to the City Council. He said he thought it would be more proper to look at the ordinance language to see why this does not fit and he would plan to vote opposed. Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000025 Revision LLC, 165 Cristofori Circle, for variances to permit an Oversized Accessory Building on the property streetward of the principal building as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 3, Nays 2 (Erickson and Ressler). 6. LA23-000028 LOREN AND JULIA PARKS, 350 CRESTVIEW AVENUE, REQUESTS LOT AREA, FRONT YARD SETBACK, SIDE YARD SETBACK, REAR YARD SETBACK, AND 75 -FOOT CREEK SETBACK VARIANCES, AS WELL AS A VARIANCE FOR HARDCOVER WITHIN THE 75 -FOOT CREEK SETBACK IN ORDER TO REDEVELOP THE PROPERTY. City Planner Curtis said the applicants are requesting a number of variances in order to support the construction of a new home on the property. The applicant is proposing a two-story home with a full basement. The property is non -conforming in size. The small lot sizes and the impact of the 75 -foot Creek setback combine to make the lot nearly unbuildable, she said. The following variances for setbacks are requested: 27 -foot front yard setback; a 10 -foot side yard setback from the north side lot line, a 34.7 -foot rear setback, and a 39.4 setback from the creek. The new home plan was designed to minimize the hard cover within the creek setback as well, Curtis said. She added there have been calls and questions from neighbors but no public comments. Staff recommends approval of the variances as applied. Curtis said the planning commission should consider a recommendation for approval which includes the use of pervious paver materials for the proposed patio area in order to offset some of the stormwater impact within the creek setback. Julia and Loren Parks, 350 Crestview Ave., said they purchased the home several years ago. Prior to that, about 10 years ago, the pervious owners had put forth a building plan that had been approved. They tried to stay very close to the previous owner's plan. They have a family and are looking to build a home where they can raise their children in the community. They initially proposed building closer to the creek but moved the plan several feet toward the road with the creek set -back in mind. The proposed patio is within the existing footprint for the current house. They also said they have conditional approval from the watershed district. Acting Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. Page 7 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mike Huthwaite, 3382 Bayside Rd., said their home is almost kitty korner from the applicant's. He said he has looked at the plans for the house and wanted to speak for the neighborhood in saying it looks excellent and will be a nice house for a nice family. He said it would affect them the most as they are right across, and it will affect them positively. Acting Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. Ressler said staff is in support of the application and it makes a lot of sense. Erickson moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000028, 350 Crestview Avenue, variances as Applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS — Update on June 12, 2023 City Council Meeting Oakden updated the Commissioners on the June 12, 2023 City Council meeting noting the Council reviewed four items the Planning Commission had previously reviewed at that meeting and supported each of the recommendations of the commission. ADJOURNMENT Libby moved, Schultze seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. ATTEST: Christopher Bollis, Chair Page 8 of 8 Date Application Received: 02/21/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/12/2023 Review Period (Extended) Expires: 09/01/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: July 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000005, Hagen Landscaping, 2699 Kelly Avenue, CUP — Seawall Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to reconstruct a seawall within the floodway district. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background The applicant is proposing to reconstruct a seawall at 2699 Kelly Avenue. The current seawall is made of wood; it is in disrepair and in need of replacement. The replacement seawall will be constructed using steel sheet piles. The new seawall will extend inland just beyond the extent of the existing wall on the north and south ends; and due to the change in material, the new seawall will result in a minor "footprint" expansion (shown in the enlarged plan view, page 3 of Exhibit D). The current seawall is adjacent to City -owned Lydiard Beach and serves six property owners as it protects their docks and lake access. The permanent nature of the seawall within the floodway requires a conditional use permit (CUP). CUP (Section 78-1118 The floodway, meaning any wetland or lake and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which carry or store regional flood discharge, is regulated by a specific set of standards within the City Code. A conditional use permit is required for all forms of shoreline protection, including wood, metal, mortared stone or concrete seawalls. The proposed seawall must adhere to the standards and procedures set forth in City Code Sections 78-1148 and 78-1119. Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-1148 & 78-1119) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; Some forms of shoreline protection, including seawalls can be anticipated as accessory uses along the lakeshore. This criterion is met. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Seawalls and other shoreline protection methods are permitted as a conditional use permit. This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. This criterion is met. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This condition is not applicable. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The replacement seawall is not expected to generate an excessive demand for public services. This criterion is met. FILE # LA23-000005 July 17, 2023 Page 2 of 4 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; A seawall currently exists in this location today. The application is to replace the seawall that is in disrepair so that it continues to protect the channel. There is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The replacement wall is similar in size and nature to the existing wall. The character of the area will not change. This criterion is met. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other shoreline protection measures including seawalls along the lakeshore within the community. This criterion is met. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed replacement seawall will protect the channel and lake access enjoyed by six property owners and improve the use and enjoyment of the properties. This criterion is met. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The proposed seawall will be in the same location as the existing and will not require screening or buffering. This criterion is met. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; This criterion is met. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed seawall has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding area and be similar to the existing seawall in place. The installation method for the sheet piles will minimize impact to the natural environment. This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; This criterion is not applicable. 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This criterion is met. Additional standards for floodway conditional uses (Sec. 78-1119). A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the one percent chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Accessory structures. Accessory structures, as identified in section 78-1118(1), may be permitted, provided that: (1) Structures are not intended for human habitation; (2) Structures will have a low flood damage potential; (3) Structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (4) Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; FILE # LA23-000005 July 17, 2023 Page 3 of 4 (5) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the state building code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (6) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the state building code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: a. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and b. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (d) Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (e) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the one percent chance or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. (f) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis The proposed seawall meets the requirements of the City floodplain regulations. The proposal will also be required to obtain all necessary permits from the appropriate agencies MCWD and LMCD regarding the project. There are no specific Building Code construction standards for seawalls and will rely on an engineered design. The City will require that a building permit be issued to document the construction of the seawall. The City's primary concern regarding this project is the access to the seawall and the construction of it. The seawall is adjacent to City -owned property, Lydiard Beach. The construction of the proposed seawall will require access through and staging on City owned property. The City will require a temporary encroachment agreement to be executed by the applicant and the City for the construction of the project. As part of the permit, the City will require that any damage to Lydiard Beach during the construction process be mitigated and repaired. Further, the City will stipulate that the entire project take no more than 30 days to complete. The applicant has acknowledged this requirement and confirmed that the project will be completed in that timeline. FILE # LA23-000005 July 17, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The seawall may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the other regulatory agencies, including but not limited to MCWD, LMCD, and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. A buildingpermit is required for the installation of the seawall. 3. An encroachment agreement is executed for the use of Lydiard Beach during the construction of the seawall subject to the following conditions: a. The construction of the seawall and the subsequent use of Lydiard Beach shall be completed in no more than 30 days after the work begins. b. The applicant must restore any damaged landscaping, fencing, gravel drive within one (1) calendar year of the project's completion. c. The storage of equipment or construction may not impact snow removal or storage of snow on City owned property. d. The City shall close public access to Lydiard Beach during the 30 -day duration of work. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Survey Exhibit D. Plans Exhibit E. Mailing List & Map 6/23/23,12:50 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 02/21/2023 Address: 2699 Kelly Avenue Orono, MN 55331 Parcel Number: 2111723230041 Land Use Number: LA23-000005 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: CHARLES MORIN Address: TANYA M SREPEL 2699 KELLY AVE Applicant: Name: Chris Hagen Company: Hagen Landscape Address: 10000 great plains blvd chaska, MN 55318 hagenllllc@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: replace existing wood seawall with new steel sheet wall Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: / https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=11400117&WorkOrder_ID=866... 1 /1 Charles Morin Sheet piling project 2699 Kelley Ave, Orono, MN 55331 The Morin's currently have a wood seawall that is along the western property along Lydiard Beach. The wood wall has reached the end of its life and needs to be replaced. We have completed the engineering for a new steel sheet wall. Access to the site is restricted and does not allow for barge or land access from the Morins Property. We will need access from the back side of the wall through the Lydiard Beach road. Along with seeking permits through the Orono, we are also working with MCWD to obtain permits if any are needed for the installation. The current wood wall was installed prior to the formation of the MCWD. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CHARLES MORIN ALI 0• STONE -S WING -WALL' (1) PLASTIC SPLIT RAIL FENCE DOCK, LANDING, AND PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1559929 WEST 4.00 TL6T 4 z SPLIT(RAIL.__. FENCK LAKE MINNETONKA LEGEAL DESCRIPTIONS (FROM CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1351749) Lot 2, Block 2, Outlot 4, WALTERS-PORT • : Denotes found iron marker o : Denotes set iron marker This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described properties, an existing house, drive, visa ble hardcover, and topography. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. NOTE: Regarding Outlot 4, according to the DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANT'S for WALTER'S PORT and amendments, there are non exclusive easements in favor of the other lots in the subdivision in and over Outlot 4 for use as boat harbor. The full extent of these easements is not covered in this survey. NOTE: Bearings are based on an assumed datum REVISIONS DATE I BY REMARKS I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 7"Z6' -1k MINN. LICENSE NUMBER KELLY AVE. o o co 00 Z \ AIC PAD (G) \\\ GEN. \ DATE 7-26-18 SCALE 1 "=30' JOB NO. 18-225 >HEET OF SHEETS EXISTING HOUSE #2701 _7DECK EXISTING HOUSE #2703 PC Exhibit C 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 00'09 1 H N LIJ o N Z J -. Q i EL Z.8 I.- OQ m Q M u W C c) N� corner of surveyed area. Elevation =931.97. UW ° O O �— in Z I f E I- J Lu N c— Hi2dON UTILITY VAULT _J LIJ a'd ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) O CABLE TV BOX J UTILITY MANHOLE gW U F FIBER/COMM. LINE ® > m ELECTRICAL OUTLET b'69 H o FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER m HAND HOLE observe all the utilities located on the subject property. 0 GASMAIN © ELECTRICAL METER W BOLLARD 4. Site Address: Unassigned, Lydiard ave and Kelly Ave, Orono, MN 55331. ---G----G-- U OO FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE ❑ _ Z (n 5. Please note a boundarydetermination was not art of the scope of this survey. The description listed above is per Hennepin Count tax records and may not be the lastest p p y• p p p y y 0H OVERHEAD UTILITIES < Q POWER POLE Q FUEL TANK J Z J > DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Outlot 3, Walters -Port. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES C7 Z W H (n co Y (n 0 o U) �o W �XO04 X O c\i W 2k Oj 10 a c+ 0'96 LO 9,Z6 6 �9Z O/l yd W00 b'h aCL (Da o • _ zo w 100 O ° X ,oma, o .oV, of v H O ° 10-1 �a X o X 0 �� X Q �� v a p 9�\ ,o o� _ X ss 931 o a '°ao M sem, �, ;, �� Q 0 931 25 930 87'4 'd' °� Dock 3�a� m — Dock 923 89 _ Z \92922608/ a �9y'3 B3 X92R 92328 2�- 92319 �37> � 0) / 8� X 92368 �23p8 X ,Dock "2� 923 2R X 92335 X \\ 92369 X X O 92335 X g 06 W 0 I ,\Rip -Rap J �923� J b 1 924\6 tia W O2 # Z ' W 0_ 82480 (L� p6 0 922 74 �J 92377 X Dock I / -� O= m Z OJ I '��' ! Dockg2��29 269 X X14 ��,L� 922 73 X X LC \ 923 53 X I\ X / J \ Dock 'o`O g1 W Z >Lu JL'i W O I 92454 // 92265 O \ 9228 Q a X9 63 M� a o O> Y ~ W Z Q 93095 X Y RI Ra 6 X 92250 X O \ ms's Corrugated 92268 X cO N (n z (n U �_ U -Rip-Rap�o \ Metal Sea 92256 X x2337 X \ g2 M >_ H Q Q O I Z 1 o i 92420 9 922 .9 g4 X �\ 92409 9.70 9�z1 X9 r Y Lu (n W W (O 92410 X c'�SXv� 'N ( 9'� �J23\ 92 8 Wall �\ 92288 X Dock s9 •\ ,cu, 3 \ j W Y I ,rte 92321 �,y^� 92261 X a 'N 92225 2 Xg2290 ^\ 923 9228 - f ° o N Z J -. Q 93�� 931 97 � JI 1 97 , EL Z.8 I.- OQ m _ 92.9 � ` �- 0 " 927,59 � """ 0 ho � ��� �� u W C� corner of surveyed area. Elevation =931.97. UW 2 in Z 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility E I- J Lu 0t7'09Z Hi2dON UTILITY VAULT z z J ---E----E-- ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) © CABLE TV BOX OO UTILITY MANHOLE utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or H OI? 9V NO aW U z U Lu I-_ ILL a0� Lj Dock X X 23_ i� X [/, 83 4 ,o B01 rh 5 9 058 925 03 X 922 6B / \ X O "x 9`� X g2� �',. \ 3C ( i }, 923 58 X 2j \ �'i 92369 0 I sz R4p-Rapo X 92293X --X'923 03 �'24� 0Z'0V� H X `�� \ g2 / 9iX X 923 826 61 �2 924 03 924 29 924 55 924 60 � 923 70 923 84 923 73 92414— 9ti�^ 924 78 13 00'0 CJI 9313\ _ 930 58 930 59 910= 930 9 931 02 92846 92866 928 22 92814 92809 92B 03 5 931 2 1 930 71 929 95 ,� X92 g28 / X X 929 26 X X 929 45 \ \ }, 663 92854 X 928 41 X) / 931 70 O� Q j w O 930 37 X 9 07 i929 07�- X 929 \� O V 21;ib O N 290u -9. 2.9, \ SITE BM IO - \�-SMH Z_ W W M o� 0 02' Rim=93197 I (n LOZ Lu J J W O ./ ���2z —;930-- 9�1 /.i\, Cn U 1:� ` 93020 ,\�r\\IIO Q O s s� so p W 7 3AIb0 �3Ab'bJ O 930 14 �J 10 93313 X sa� �,.�� 931 0 j 9�� so X 92774 56 X _.,636 X 9�\ v X > 6 72 ti 2" Q aw 93131 (n LL 93152 931 40 93126 :498 �L-92568- 92459 931 2 g31 5,,6���((( g2� X_ X ` \ 927 82 � Symbol 93�� 931 97 � JI 1 97 , 931 36 — 927 72 93089-- �-- —Rip -Rap O _ 92.9 � ` �- 0 " 927,59 � """ 0 ho � ��� �� 92854 cg' 111 Z corner of surveyed area. Elevation =931.97. Z 2 W 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility E ELECTRIC LINE ❑D J 30 15 0 15 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 1. Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). Li � Symbol m �O I Legend 2. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top rim of the sanitary manhole located approximately 11.5 feet northwesterly from northwest dock � ��� �� � III corner of surveyed area. Elevation =931.97. 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility E ELECTRIC LINE ❑D AIR CONDITIONER ❑D UTILITY VAULT companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground ---E----E-- ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) © CABLE TV BOX OO UTILITY MANHOLE utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or F FIBER/COMM. LINE ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE m ELECTRICAL OUTLET more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly ---F----F-- FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER El HAND HOLE observe all the utilities located on the subject property. 0 GASMAIN © ELECTRICAL METER ® BOLLARD 4. Site Address: Unassigned, Lydiard ave and Kelly Ave, Orono, MN 55331. ---G----G-- GASMAIN (RECORD) OO FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE 0, FLAG POLE 5. Please note a boundarydetermination was not art of the scope of this survey. The description listed above is per Hennepin Count tax records and may not be the lastest p p y• p p p y y 0H OVERHEAD UTILITIES � POWER POLE Q FUEL TANK description of record. There may be easements or other matters of record we unaware of thus not shown hereon. > SANITARY SEWER L GUY WIRE 6. The boundary and survey Information shown ra ed in the background are per a survey b Gromber &Associates, Inc., ro�ect number 18-225 dated 7-25-2018, y y grayed g p y y g project --->----->--- (RECORD) SANITARY SEWER RECORD © GAS METER �- HANDICAP SYMBOL provided to us by client. » STORM SEWER © GAS MANHOLE � LIGHT POLE � GAS VALVE 6. Partial topographic information shown in foreground in bold per field measurements taken by Civil Site Group on 10-11-2022. ---»-----»--- STORM SEWER (RECORD) ® ROOF DRAIN 0 MAIL BOX T TELEPHONE LINE ® SEWER CLEAN OUT ---T----T-- TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD) � SIGN OS SANITARY MANHOLE w WATERMAIN CONIFEROUS TREE ---W----W-- WATERMAIN (RECORD) ST O STORM MANHOLE x CHAINLINK FENCELINE ® CATCH BASIN 0 DECIDUOUS TREE 11 WOODEN FENCELINE Q FLARED END SECTION oo— GUARDRAIL ❑T TELEPHONE BOX io SB SOIL BORING a a QT TELEPHONE MANHOLE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT a a CONCRETE SURFACE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL O SET IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT OO CAST IRON MONUMENT PAVER SURFACE /o\ FIRE CONNECTION © POST INDICATOR VALVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE © WATER MANHOLE GRAVEL/ LANDSCAPE g WATER VALVE SURFACE O WELL O 0 C�VHO sqe � G3 Oo M p ,ivil Engineering • Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 4-0 L O a C O ca J m a� U W LU Z 0 D W_ J U 00 M L0 L0 O C CC G a Y C6 O m CU N 0 O O CD T_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. R6KY L. S LIEN DATE 10-19-2022 LICENSE No. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW TK DRAWN BY CF REVIEWED BY CJ UPDATED BY ,A VICINITY MAP m NMI REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION NO.:22311.00 BATHOMETRIC SURVEY V 1 0 COPYRIGHT 2022 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GENERAL NOTES: 1. GENERAL A. ENGINEER CONTACT INFORMATION: BRAD BRIMHALL, P.E., ENGINEERING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL LLC, (507) 321-8189. B. THE SCOPE OF WORK COVERED BY THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDES THE DESIGN OF A PERMANENT EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM. IT IS BEYOND ENGINEERING PARTNERS SCOPE OF SERVICES TO CONDUCT A PRE—CONSTRUCTION CONDITION SURVEY, MONITOR VIBRATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, OR EVALUATE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON ADJACENT STRUCTURES DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. C. ENGINEERING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, LLC (ENGINEER) IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE DUE TO INSTALLATION OR EXTRACTION OF THE RETENTION WALL PILES. D. THE ENGINEER DOES NOT CONTROL THE MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. DESIGN CRITERIA A. THE PERMANENT EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PROJECT DOCUMENTS: i. CIVIL SURVEY PREPARED BY CIVIL SITE GROUP AND DATED 10/19/22. ii. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC AND DATED 12/13/22 B. THE PERMANENT EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR THE RETAINED SOIL HEIGHTS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. C. THE PERMANENT RETENTION WALL IS DESIGNED FOR ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CONDITIONS. D. DESIGN WATER ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. E. CONTACT ENGINEERING PARTNERS IF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS DEPICTED IN THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OR OTHERWISE DESCRIBED ON THESE DRAWINGS. F. THE RETENTION WALL IS DESIGNED FOR A 500 PSF SURCHARGE LOADING FROM EXCAVATOR POSITIONED 5—FEET FROM WALL FOR THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION CONDITION. TEMPORARY CRANE MATS MAY BE NEEDED IF SOFT SOILS ARE PRESENT BEHIND THE WALL AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. G. ANY OTHER TRAFFIC SURCHARGE OR MATERIALS STORAGE AT THE TOP OF WALLS AND/OR GREATER THAN THE ASSUMED SURCHARGE LOADING MUST BE EVALUATED BY ENGINEERING PARTNERS. 3. CODES AND STANDARDS A. PILING HANDBOOK, 8TH ED. ARCELOR RPS. B. AISC 14TH EDITION. 4. FIELD CONDITIONS A. VERIFY DEPTH AND LIMITS OF EXCAVATION PRIOR TO START OF WORK. B. VERIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ANY OTHER BURIED OBSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK. UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE ALL UTILITIES PRESENT. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE ALL UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PROPERLY LOCATED. C. FIELD VERIFY RETENTION WALL LAYOUT USING SURVEYED REFERENCE LINES IN THE FIELD. CONTACT ENGINEERING PARTNERS IF THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FIELD SURVEY AND THE DRAWINGS. 5. SAFETY A. THE ENGINEER AND THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. B. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING FALL PROTECTION AT THE TOPS OF THE RETENTION WALLS AS REQUIRED. 6. USE OF DOCUMENTS A. USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED FOR OTHER PROJECTS, ADDITIONS TO OR EXTENSIONS OF THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT WITH THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ENGINEERING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, LLC. BOAT SLIP REPAIRS 2699 KELLY AVENUE EXCELSIOR, MN SHEET PILE WALL PERMANENT EARTH RETENTION WALL NOTES: 1. MATERIALS A. STEEL SHEET PILE SECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A572 GR 50, Fy = 50 KSI. B. STEEL MEMBER SIZES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR STRENGTH AND DEFLECTION, AND MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH SECTIONS OF LARGER AREA, SECTION MODULUS, AND MOMENT OF INERTIA, UPON APPROVAL BY ENGINEERING PARTNERS. C. BACKFILL: SAND, SAND AND GRAVEL MIX, OR CRUSHED ROCK HAVING LESS THAN 129 PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE. 2. EARTH RETENTION WALL INSTALLATION A. ENGINEERING PARTNERS HAS NOT INVESTIGATED ANY IMPACT PILE INSTALLATION MAY HAVE ON ADJACENT SOILS OR STRUCTURES AND RECOMMENDS THAT A THIRD—PARTY TESTING AGENCY BE CONTRACTED TO EVALUATE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, AND PAVEMENTS TO DAMAGE AND/OR SETTLEMENT DUE TO THE INSTALLATION OF PILES. THIS IS NOT PART OF ENGINEERING PARTNERS SCOPE OF SERVICES. & ENGINEERING PARTNERS RECOMMENDS THAT VIBRATIONS BE MONITORED DURING PILE INSTALLATION BY A THIRD—PARTY TESTING AGENCY. THIS IS NOT PART OF ENGINEERING PARTNERS SCOPE OF SERVICES. THE TESTING AGENCY SHOULD ESTABLISH VIBRATION CRITERIA THAT IS TO BE FOLLOWED BY CONTRACTOR TO AVOID DAMAGE TO AND/OR SETTLEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, AND PAVEMENTS. IF VIBRATION CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED DURING PILE INSTALLATION, STOP AND NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEERING PARTNERS IMMEDIATELY. C.THE METHOD OF INSTALLATION OF THE PILES SHALL BE AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR INSTALLER. D. CARE SHOULD BE GIVEN TO NOT DAMAGE ANY PILE DURING THE DRIVING / INSTALLATION PROCESS. IF, IN THE OPINION OF ENGINEERING PARTNERS, A PILE IS DAMAGED TO THE EXTENT IT WILL NOT SERVE THE INTENDED PURPOSE IN THE STRUCTURE, IT SHALL BE REMOVED, AND A REPLACEMENT PILE INSTALLED. E. USE PRE—DRILLING OR OTHER METHODS, AS NEEDED, TO REDUCE VIBRATIONS TO ACCEPTABLE LEVELS (DEFINED BY OTHERS), OR TO ADVANCE PILES THROUGH DENSE SOILS OR COBBLES TO ACHIEVE THE TARGET PILE TIP ELEVATION. F. THE PILES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOCATIONS AND TO THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. G. INSTALLATION TOLERANCES: i. PILE PLUMBNESS: + / — 19. ii. PILE LENGTH AND EMBEDMENT DEPTH: NO LESS THAN SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. H.CONTACT ENGINEERING PARTNERS IF PERMANENT RETENTION WALL IS INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF THE TOLERANCES NOTED AND/OR MISALIGNMENT OF MEMBERS IS DISCOVERED. ENGINEERING PARTNERS WILL REVIEW SUCH CONDITIONS AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS ON A CASE—BY—CASE BASIS. 3. MONITORING A. IF VIBRATION IS RECORDED ABOVE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS OR IF DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES OR PAVEMENTS IS OBSERVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL CEASE PILE INSTALLATION AND EVALUATE POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THE INSTALLATION METHODS IN AN EFFORT TO REDUCE VIBRATIONS TO ACCEPTABLE LEVELS. SHEET INDEX 1 TITLE, NOTES & SHEET INDEX 2 OVERALL PLAN 3 ENLARGED PLAN 4 DETAILS & SECTION L, 1 11 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASAWN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ENGINEERING BKB DR HAGEN LANDSCAPE & BARGE SERVICES"V 0 Q Q BY DATE AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1IIC/'._gyp 1 PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, LLC 7400 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 (612) 886-3730 1 www.engineeringportners.net BKB CHECKED CAU BOAT SLIP REPAIRS 2699 KELLY AVENUE EXCELSIOR, M N SHEET PILE WALL PROJECT 22.219 SHEET NO. 1 PEER REVIEWED GTG Q PROJECT MANAGER BKB BRADLEY K. BRIMHALL 1 /13/23 52395 DATE: REG. NO. DATE 1/13/23 REV DESCRIPTION OF REVISION ?w m � o W Ox# G� O� REFER SHEET 3 / FOR ENLALA RGED c PLAN 9 6 a ¢ap 9'✓40 ——u�J31- '6 'b� q. _"U��9� g"�l'br ��� I/ �.-. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. �p Z W ������.�� BKB 00'086 HDJ N U D z D IL N DR -N BKB �> U 0 0 w °�' R O L PROJECT 22.219 J REVIEWED GTG E LE ?w m � o W Ox# G� O� REFER SHEET 3 / FOR ENLALA RGED c PLAN 9 6 a ¢ap 9'✓40 ——u�J31- '6 'b� q. _"U��9� g"�l'br ��� I/ �.-. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. �p Z W ������.�� BKB HAGEN LANDSCAPE & BARGE SERVICES V,VV ej$216. )( 82 O X h• 923:�ZRZ 923.29 x / 923.19 x 9.w e2xs9 X �, X m DR -N BKB �> U CHECKED CAU w °�' R O L PROJECT 22.219 3w`�`r' REVIEWED GTG �'� y.�p9 ,( °dr �N3 �a x 9ux S b'69 ` m o LSZ 0�1 bd uJ m w=u z O mxm N J z ¢ Nam >� ¢ z I > �G cfi /� s'� yp�?3,�seX I/ a22)a X x x K 9z4 ,./ x 92z65 aunX 92153 X \ / b s b O .t .� N OF 3 Y a 0.10.95 3qq 092259 X /\ s 1 922.69 x I `S m w w v w o z1 x SHEET PILE WALL / x/ J' X suae x / 9u3A W p YK w a/s'20' m _ Zm ❑ D_' K v �g v o o i L ".N W Y O m I JLC\ a 922.6,x X `Q1 x 9186 / meg✓ Y / �922225x \ 01�q--� x X / / O 9'1%' 9Z✓' / j b Z8 Q = w w w. 0 OL I .925. / �f— ey \�J 92564�„9� .93 �.� s3"—�` -- Lx �� 923.59X z `x >X\ OZ'ObE HDJON—x 00 041 s .s — — M1P924.9\. 9 —�. 939.9 811.02\ 92916 928.66 2622 2914 828A8' y2p z c� O Z H1210N J51E an.2o x s']0.n x 929x5 / \ F 920.26 x X 92x.45 � /93an \9 _ _ _ \ 9zn 1x� % i \ I l X OZ Ob <p� '9�29— N -• BM •__vi9 ' ¢ m o x W W p, D.1 c:, X 929.9) 92y.�w ,ilaON— 0 r Rin�9]1.9) F a m �02N0 W F ii oz rL a -330._ W w / Q 939.29 ¢Q a� 2 //3AV oa�o g v. P(JV9I'� 3AIHO 13AV210 C) OVERALL PLAN fZ� 0 25 50 I � � SCALE IN FEET <Q v 931: I 931.52 i vqY 0 X 824.99 92).82 92).T1 92912 9't8y1 922.)4 I m a L, 1 11 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. �p ENGINEERING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, LLC 7400 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 (612) 886-3730 1 www.engineeringportners.net ������.�� BKB HAGEN LANDSCAPE & BARGE SERVICES V,VV Q DR -N BKB 0 CHECKED CAU BOAT SLIP REPAIRS 2699 KELLY AVENUE EXCELSIOR, M N MIN SHEET PILE WALL PROJECT 22.219 REVIEWED GTG SHEET NO. 2 0PEER BRADLEY K. BRIMHALL 1/13/23 52395 REG. N0. PROJECT MANAGER BKB REV DESCRIPTION OF REVISION 6YdDATEDATE: DATE 1/13/23 tol 1p L \ 90 1p9 s3 'S g3� 40 .0 - --- ---- �- vo �o a`b rn� s�=90---�� o 9i0 ' S // mac, �; •6 -3�---__i ��-•�� I r 31.25 --- 930.87 s ----------- \ I I - - - 923.89 _ _ _ _ - / I I g 8 9261 p8,� a� - `g� - � \ , - g3/ / X 923.68 Og X X �g] 923.83 X 923.28 X 923.69 X 923.19 X �� 923.35 X II o 92 923.35 I 11 g2480 506 g X I //� 822.74 92357.77X > I 0' ���g21. 1 0,1 822.73 X 923.53 X I y J I 1 I \ ��, 1 rDj I I I X X I I ��� a� X JJ 9�1 6 III 924 54 / X 922065 I 9 822 > I I I I C ' I I / I _ O 922.68 = I 930.95 I I / a o 922.50 X � __Qp / ( 5p o ^\��1 /� �� 922.56 Xw X ��I 923.37 X I 1 (\ \ 50 51 \ ( I 7924.20 rn ZII 9 20. co s� g X/ � y X (!1 � 924.09/ \9�� Z9& \ �' i I ( `^d1 N0� •� Xg ? g22 4^ 9 / 922�88X�� \\69 s 0 I �� 0 I \�-! g23�� So ��h oc, I ��\ 2382 / 2280---- I � I ' 21 \ �9 922.61 X X\ i / II 822.25 X �I // X �' \ �238p / 285 2 30.58 --- cb 1 \ X \ -�-2 ' I I 2 '4 \\ / X 922.66�� \� X // I �/ OgOI$�X 922o`er? 5.\ X /�� \ 4 23 9c'� � I--- 923.58 I \ \ / \ \ \ \ ` SHEET PILE WALL 3 X y ( X g,L2 i \ �� ' 6.9 .� J I II 2564_ 4�0X�\922.93X- 42 923.03 g-� ---\ ��' I 7 },(� r'. �`--,� �� �� X923 OCr.O V G H12JON X --- o0p� 924.78 \ --__1S g 924.29--9 4.5 -- 9 �0 = 2 0 _ ----- --- --- _-__- I 00,10 51931,3 I 930.59 --- - - 931.3( o 930.93 931.02 - 928.46 928.66 928.22 o a \0 928.14 928.09 928.03 �\ VOID® t 931.20 9 EXIST. DOCK g 95 EXIST. WOOD RETAINING WALL - - - - - - - - 9�C/ \ EXIST. X 1X (REMOVE AS REQUIRED TO \ 928.41 / METAL_ _ _ RETAINING INSTALL SHEET PILE) \ X \ \ - - - - � \ 6 928.54 X .929.45 7N � Q \ 930.37 X \ 929.07 x-- 2g�tt X OCr•O��OXHSITE w OLOSMH BM Z ji 0)O/\246' -1"C0 06 SHEETS) N d,Rim=931.97 \ JQW _O3 x 25' LONG /� W f I i_0- 7>- Z W 02 0 10 --IV �\ \ �� w \ DAl�:la 713Ad�10 ANTICIPATED SEQUENCE FOR SHEET PILE WALL CONSTRUCTION: 1. REMOVE SECTIONS OF EXISTING METAL DOCK AS NEEDED TO INSTALL SHEET PILE 2. INSTALL SHEET PILE AT OFFSET FROM EXISTING WOODEN WALL. 3. BACKFILL VOID BETWEEN EXISTING WOODEN RETAINING WALL AND SHEET PILE WALL. 4. ABANDON IN PLACE EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL. \930-- g3 0.20 -100 s s 37 ENLARGED PLAN fZ� 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET m NOTE: BACKGROUND TAKEN FROM FOLLOWING DRAWING: BATHOMETRIC SURVEY V1.0 PREPARED BY CIVIL SITE GROUP AND DATED 10/19/22 KEYNOTES: O FIELD VERIFY BEGINNING AND END OF SHEET PILE WALL. O CONFIRM LOCATION OF POTENTIAL EXISTING TIEBACK ANCHORS PRIOR TO INSTALLING SHEET PILE AT EXISTING METAL RETAINING WALL. Q MONITORING REQUIRED (SEE SHEET 1). ® BACKFILL VOID BETWEEN EXISTING WOODEN RETAINING WALL AND SHEET PILE WALL (SEE SHEET 1 FOR MATERIAL TYPE). K\ <I L\ 1 11 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. �p ENGINEERING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, LLC 7400 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 (612) 886-3730 1 www.engineeringportners.net �.�� BKB HAGEN LANDSCAPE & BARGE SERVICES V,VV Q DR -AM BKB 0 CHECKED CAU BOAT SLIP REPAIRS 2699 KELLY AVENUE EXCELSIOR, MN SHEET PILE WALL PROJECT 22.219 RE WED GTG SHEET NO. Z 3 0PEER BRADLEY K. BRIMHALL 11323 DATE: REG. N0. 52395 // PROJECT MANAGER BKB REV DESCRIPTION OF REVISION BY DATE DATE 1/13/23 I D ' I ' I I I PZC13 I I I I SHEET PILES (TYR.) I I I I I I PLACE SHEET PILES BEYOND END OF EXIST. WOOD RETAINING WALLILE I ' J® BACKFILL VOID BACKFILL SLOUGHED I C / WITH IMPORTED FILL AREA WITH IMPORTED FILL I w EXIST. WOOD RETAINING WALL 1 -0"O3 L_ 0 5'-0" 5'-0" w I NO NO ^_m SURCHARGE NO - - ZONE TOP SHEET PILE - - ZONE TOP SHEET PILE O I EXISTOIL. GRADE EL. 931.0 EXIST. GRADE EL. 931.0 EL. 930.0 III-1 =-=III DESIGN WATER LEVEL02 EL. 930.0 DESIGN WATER LEVEL O2 1=1 �I 1=1=111=1-I_I=1 Q=_- EL. 929.4 EL 929.4 j\ (VARIES) m I II (VARIES) I-1 =111111 \\\ BEGIN RETAINING WALL 1 }\ SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" x J 1 4 <mfl IIII�I IIII�I IIIITI J BOTTOM() Il- CHANNEL111=111111 —111111 _111111 —III— CHANNEL BOTTOM 1 _=1 1=11 f III -1 1=1OIL = EL. 922.0 -III=III=III—III 'III—III III = _ _ _ _ _ _ = EL. 922.0 I- 11=III=III=III=III=III=III=III= (MAX. -VARIES) 11=11 X111=III=III=.11—III=1`�III= =III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III= (MAX. -VARIES) EXIST. WOOD 'X\ oI RETAINING EXIST. WOOD RETAINING WALL BEYOND � WALL (REMOVE WHERE REQUIRED) \ o \ \ PZC13 SHEET PILE, OR EQUAL PZC13 SHEET PILE, OR EQUAL 1 \ \ I (TYP. ALL SHEET PILE) I (TYP. ALL SHEET PILE) /^� PLACE SHEET ' PILES BEYOND TAL J \ J�1 OF EXIST. METAL RETAINING WALL\. PZC13 f� JI SHEET PILES (TYP,) EXIST. WALL METAL RETAINING PILE TIP PILE TIP EL. 906.0 EL. 906.0 (TYP. ALL SHEET PILE) (TYP. ALL SHEET PILE) _�_ SECTION TYP. A SECTION SLOUGHED AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION B _ SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O" 4 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 4 ' J a \ EXIST. WOOD RETAINING WALL N \ I \ W \ \ KEYNOTES: \ 1O DESIGN CHANNEL BOTTOM ELEVATION = 922.0 END RETAINING WAV 2 O DESIGN WATER ELEVATION = 929.4 SCALE: 1 4" = 1'-0" 4 \ Q3 PLACE SHEET PILE AT OFFSET FROM EXISTING \ WOOD RETAINING WALL. ® BACKFILL VOID BETWEEN EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL AND SHEET PILE WALL WITH IMPORTED BACKFILL MEETING CRITERIA ON SHEET 1. 05 BACKFILL SLOUGHED AREAS BEHIND SHEET PILE WALL WITH IMPORTED BACKFILL MEETING CRITERIA ON SHEET 1. 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS DESIGNED BKB HAGEN LANDSCAPE & BARGE SERVICES REVISION Q PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ENGINEERING DRAWN AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS BKB 0 OF T STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHECKED PROJECT PARTNERS cnu BOAT SLIP REPAIRS 22.219 0PEER RE WED 2699 KELLY AVENUE SHEET NO INTERNATIONAL, LLC GTG � A BRADLEY K. BRIMHALL 7400 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH PROJECT MANAGER BKB EXCELSIOR, IVIN 4 1/13/23 52395 RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 DATE REV DESCRIPTION OF REVISION BY DATE DATE: REG. NO. (612) 886-3730 1 www.engineeringportners.net 1/13/23 SHEET PILE WALL 38 20-117-23 14 0002 38 20-117-23 14 0012 38 21-117-23 23 0027 KAREN J O'MALLEY PETER A14N & SUSAN AHN CHAD S & JUNE E TEARLE 2615 LYDIARD CIR 3275 CARMAN RD 2749 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0003 38 20-117-23 14 0017 38 21-117-23 23 0028 MICHAEL TSYPIS MARILYN H MCCLASKEY JAY K WOOD & BARBARA D WOOD CYNTHIA M TSYPIS P O BOX 6 2745 KELLY AVE 2625 LYDIARD AVE MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0004 38 20-117-23 14 0025 38 21-117-23 23 0029 JANICE & JAMES BERG JACK EUGSTER/CAROL M EUGSTER PAUL JOSEPH RANDALL 2655 LYDIARD AVE 2655 KELLY AVE 511 DANNY CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 SAN RAMON CA 94582 38 20-117-23 14 0005 38 21-117-23 23 0010 38 21-117-23 23 0030 CHELSEA V STEINMEYER JAMES DAVID JERONIMUS PREMIUM PROPERTY GROUP DEVON J STEINMEYER 2675 PHEASANT RD 13100 WAYZATA BLVD STE 400 2650 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MINNETONKA MN 55305 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0006 38 21-117-23 23 0011 38 21-117-23 23 0031 JOHN R & SHERRY L VOLKMAR MARY STEPHANIE POWELL BRUCE J BAUER 2640 KELLY AVE MICHAEL W CONWAY 2660 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2685 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0007 38 21-117-23 23 0012 38 21-117-23 23 0032 MARK TAYLOR & MARY A TAYLOR ROBERT F K MARTIN MARY JO O'BRIEN 2697 KELLY AVE STEPHANIE D SARANTOPOULOS J DENNIS O'BRIEN EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2695 PHEASANT RD 36600 N CAVE CREEK RD #9A EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CAVE CREEK AZ 85331 38 20-117-23 14 0008 38 21-117-23 23 0013 38 21-117-23 23 0033 MARK & POLLY KIEPER JOHN EDWARD HALL ALEXANDER L JOHNSTON 4965 GULF OF MEXICO DR 2705 PHEASANT RD U.S. BANK AS AGENT LONGBOAT KEY FL 34228 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 P.O. BOX 64142 ST PAUL 55164 38 20-117-23 14 0009 38 21-117-23 23 0024 38 21-117-23 23 0034 BENNETT W HOUCK MICHAEL T JORGENSEN PETER J PLUIMER MELISSA A HOUCK MARGARET C JORGENSEN RACHEL M PLUIMER 3225 CARMAN RD 2725 PHEASANT RD 2710 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0010 38 21-117-23 23 0025 38 21-117-23 23 0037 JON S NIELSEN STEPHEN L BAKKE ERICA L SCHULTE KIRSTEN R NIELSEN 2765 PHEASANT RD 2740 KELLY AVE 3245 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0011 38 21-117-23 23 0026 38 21-117-23 23 0039 D MARK HECTOR KAREN KAVERMAN ANDREW J MCDERMOTT III BONNIE K BOHN-HECTOR JOHN RICHARD FOWLER 2702 WALTERS PORT LA 3265 CARMAN RD 2755 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0040 38 21-117-23 23 0063 TED R & WENDY WEIHE STORLIE WILLIAM M DUNKLEY 2701 KELLY AVE SUSAN K DUNKLEY EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2709 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0041 38 21-117-23 23 0064 CHARLES MORIN ERIC VOGSTROM TANYA M SREPEL ELIZABETH VOGSTROM 2699 KELLY AVE 2710 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0042 38 21-117-23 23 0065 ANTHONY JAY REHMAN WILLIAM M DUNKLEY LISA A REHMAN SUSAN K DUNKLEY 2703 WALTERS PORT LA 2709 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0043 PATRICIA/RICHARD CROSBY II 2705 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0044 WILLIAM J & SANDRA J KEEGAN 2707 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0046 WILLIAM M & SUSAN K DUNKLEY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LAN #100 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 21-117-23 23 0047 ANDREW J MCDERMOTT III 2702 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0048 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INC 4910 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 38 21-117-23 23 0049 CHARLES MORIN TANYA M SREPEL 2699 KELLY AVE ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0055 CATHERINE HANSON MEAGHER 2720 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 2/21/2023 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2699 Kelly Ave This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us 6yd i3rOpC- 2E3i tin 2T54 all 7 2620 o 2740 pTl 5� TF26 2 tQl 2fi55 2615 2 5 Ke i :22v ti 3245{m — 2345 ft 2725 03) ttk. 3295 75 27 �I X31 Htl } I 2710 27&9 2791 R7 fsl 2715 ..' Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2699 Kelly Ave This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 06/20/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/23/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 08/22/2023 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator Natalie Nye, Planner July 17, 2023 \�kESHO #LA23-000032, Paul Skoog, 250 Tonka Avenue Variances for Lot Area, Lot Width, and Rear Yard Setback - Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for lot area, lot width, and rear yard setback for the construction of a new home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is requesting variances to construct a new home on the property and demolish the existing home and detached garage. The subject property is substandard in size for the LR -1A zoning district which requires a minimum of 2 acres and a 200 -foot -wide lot. The subject property is .43 acres and 150 feet in width. The proposed home will be constructed in a similar location as the existing home. The applicant is requesting a 5 -foot variance from the required 50 -foot rear yard setback in order to construct the new home and driveway within the physical constraints of the lot. The required rear yard setback is 50 feet and the proposed home will be 45 feet from the rear property line. All other setbacks and zoning requirements including hardcover and lot coverage are met. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has stated the existing topography on the site as a practical difficulty for the placement of the proposed home. The driveway placement is further restricted by an existing storm drain. The reduction in the required rear yard setback by 5 feet would lessen the driveway slope, reduce the height of needed retaining walls, and save a mature tree. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The property is substandard in both size and width and has topographical challenges. Existing site elements constrain the building envelope and site access. The site has practical difficulties supporting the applicant's request. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1A District Required Existing Proposed Front 31.85'* 55' 34.2' North Side 10' 11' 12' South Side 10' 98' 62' Rear 50' 41' 45' *The LR -1A District front yard setback is 50' however an average of the neighboring homes front yard setbacks can be used resulting in the required 31.85'setbock Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1A District Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' FILE #LA23-000032 July 17, 2023 Page 2 of 5 Actual 18,831 s.f. (0.43 acre) 150' Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Cover Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 18,831 s.f. (0.43 acre) Allowed: 3,766.2 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,927 s.f. (15.5%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Allowed Proposed Overlay District Hardcover Hardcover Tier 6,590.9 s.f. 4,288 s.f. Tier 3 (35 %) (22.7%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Area & Lot Width Variances (Section 78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties, such as the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 35 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area variance is not granted. Rear Setback Variance (Section 78-305 The applicant is proposing to construct the proposed home 45 feet from the rear property line, where a 50 -foot setback is required. The existing home on the site is approximately 41 feet from the rear property line. The proposed home will improve the rear yard setback, but due to property constraints is unable to meet the 50 -foot requirement of the code. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any FILE #LA23-000032 July 17, 2023 Page 3 of 5 use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variances for the construction of a new single-family home on a substandard parcel are supported by practical difficulties. The proposed home is in a similar location as the existing home on the property and improves certain nonconformities. The existing topography of the site and site elements such as an existing storm drain limit the placement of the home. The proposed home meets all required setbacks except for the rear yard setback of 50 feet. The requested variance is for a 45 -foot rear yard setback where the current house has a setback of 41 feet from the rear property line. The construction of a new home is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties of the substandard lot size, topography, and location of the existing site elements. This criterion is met. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a new single- family home constructed in a residential district is consistent the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. This criterion is met. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new single-family home is a reasonable use of the property. The proposed home requires a minimal rear yard setback variance in order to fit the constraints of the substandard lot. This criterion is met. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The topography and the location of an existing storm drain limits the placement of the new home and are not the result of the current property owner's actions. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a single-family home will not alter the character of the area. The proposed home will be in a similar location to that of the existing home and will meet all other zoning requirements other than the rear yard setback. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. FILE #LA23-000032 July 17, 2023 Page 4 of 5 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The substandard lot size, substandard width, topography, and existing site elements are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the topography and location of the existing elements on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed home's placement is limited on the site due to site constraints. The applicant is requesting the minimum amount necessary to construct a reasonably sized home. The requested rear yard setback of 45 feet where 50 is required is actually an improvement to what is there currently. The existing home is approximately 41 feet from the rear property line. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances allow for the construction of a new home on a substandard lot. The rear yard setback variance is minimal to construct a new home on the property. All other zoning requirements including hardcover and lot coverage are met. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has provided acknowledgement forms from the neighbors, but no other public comment has been received. Issues for Consideration Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? FILE #LA23-000032 July 17, 2023 Page 5 of 5 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances for lot area, lot width, and rear yard setback as applied. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit E. Plans Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit F. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit G. Neighbor Acknowledgements Exhibit D. Survey Exhibit H. Mailing List & Map 6/23/23, 11:05 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 06/20/2023 Address: 250 Tonka Avenue Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723140028 Land Use Number: LA23-000032 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: PAUL O & SHERRY L SKOOG Address: 250 TONKAAVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 Name: Paul Skoog Applicant: Company: Address: 250 Tonka Ave Long Lake, MN 55356 psskoog@yahoo.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Remove existing house/out building and build a new house. Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12027241 &WorkOrder_ID=872... 1 /1 6/23/23, 11:06 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000032 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The proposed home is of similar style and size of newer homes within the neighboring community thus maintaining the essential character of the locality. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan and intent of the zoning ordinance. The requested rear setback variance is in line with adjacent properties and will be an improvement from the current home/garage location allowing neighbors to the rear more open space and better air flow. The front loading garage will be less disruptive and provide more privacy to the neighboring house to the north. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The substandard depth of the lot isn't conducive to building a home within the zoning requirements (25 feet). The upward slope of Tonka Ave results in a problem peculiar to our lot. The only feasible location for a driveway is the far north end of the lot due to the uphill slope of the road and continued upward slope to the garage location. Location of a city installed storm drain along Tonka Ave further limits driveway placement. A driveway down hill from the storm drain would result in a very steep driveway and sloped apron. Moving the house back 5 feet would reduce the slope and allow an apron to be built with less slope, fill, or terracing. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed home is of similar scale and consistent in design and character with homes in the surrounding area. The single story design, despite the proposed 5 foot rear setback variance, would provide neighbors to the rear with better visibility, views, and air flow due to the setback being significantly less than the existing structures and the lower roof line of a single story home vs a two story. Neighbor's privacy is also enhanced with no second story windows overlooking their homes. Structures on either side are of similar setbacks. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Changing the house plan to a narrower footprint would result in sliding the main body of the house forward thus reducing the southern exposure of the garage and reducing or eliminating future solar options. The upward slope of Tonka Ave results in a problem peculiar to our lot. The only logical spot for a https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12027241 &WorkOrder_ID=872... 1/3 6/23/23, 11:06 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve driveway is as far north as possible due to the uphill slope of the road and slope upward to the home location. A variance allowing the home to be setback slightly would help alleviate this problem. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: A residential home is a permitted use. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Non -conforming lot width and depth are common in the immediate surrounding area. We propose replacing what is currently one of the smallest homes in the neighborhood (maybe smallest) with a larger home more centrally located on the property which, when requesting a 5 foot rear setback variance, is in fact an improvement over the existing home/garage rear setback of 40.5 feet and detached outbuilding with a 7.5 foot rear setback. This will be a significant improvement for neighbors located to the rear of the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Non -conforming lot width and depth are common in the immediate surrounding area. Similar conditions apply to neighboring land (lot size) and structures. Location of our lot with the upward slope of Tonka Ave and continued uphill angle of the most feasible driveway location are peculiar to our neighborhood. However, the proposed home will generally be in line with neighboring homes with respect to size and setbacks. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Having been an Orono resident for 36 years we wish to continue enjoying the benefits of this community by building a single story home more conducive to an older resident. While the footprint for this style might be larger then another style and require a small variance it still falls within the general parameters of the neighborhood. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Health, safety, comfort, morals, and general well-being of residents and neighbors will not be impaired or contrary to the intent of the Code. Granting of this variance will significantly improve the neighborhood appearance and safety (safer from a fire protection standpoint). 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12027241 &WorkOrder_ID=872... 2/3 6/23/23, 11:06 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Response: The substandard size of the lot and location on an upward facing slope both to the north and east create the necessity of a setback variance to assist in use of the property in a reasonable manner. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=12027241 &WorkOrder_I D=872... 3/3 City of Orono Community Development Department 270 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Letter of Intent for Zoning Variance for: Paul and Sherry Skoog 250 Tonka Ave Orono, MN 55356 Parcel ID: 0511723140028 Dear Planning and Zoning Members, We are requesting a variance for above address to seek relief of the required rear yard setback for the reasons detailed below. First, per Zoning Sec. 78-305. LR -1A district (Area, height, lot width, setbacks and yard requirements) the following requirements shall be observed: Lot Area (Minimum): 2.0 acres. Lot Width (Minimum): 200 feet Due to the size of our lot (150 feet wide by 125 feet deep) we qualify for the following non -conforming lot exceptions: Exception #1. Side yard setback. The side yard setback of the principal building shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width (150 feet x 10 = 15 feet). The lessor of these is ten feet. Exception #3. Front yard setback. Due to our non -conforming lot size the setback of the principal building shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. South neighbor setback: 33.0 feet North neighbor setback: 30.7 feet The average of these would allow a front setback of 31.85 feet. The proposed home will qualify for the above exceptions but we ask for a reduction of the rear yard setback to 45 feet from the code requirement of 50 feet. Moving the home back would help to reduce a problem with our somewhat restrictive driveway placement. Due to the existing uphill grade of the existing front road and corresponding hill on our property caused by placement of the road we are limited to building a driveway on the far north side of the property. We are further restricted by a storm drain placed on our property. Putting the driveway south of the storm drain causes an even steeper driveway than the ideal location. Moving the house back 5 feet will lessen the driveway and required apron slope, reduce the height of a probable retaining wall, and save an existing mature tree in the front yard. Granting of the variance is in harmony with the general intents and purpose of the zoning ordinance and would not be materially detrimental to the adjoining properties. Granting the requested variance would be reasonable and consistent with the comprehensive plan. It will not cause detriment or harm to the surrounding community and in fact improves the essential character of the surrounding area. The proposed single story, single family home will generally be in line with neighboring homes and be an improvement to the current rear setbacks of the existing home/garage. It will improve air flow, views, and privacy for homes to the rear and north. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, ;D -d --d 5(1 v .S&V Property ownerss (958.9) (956.9) / 956.8 • CONCRETE 40 DRIVEWAY g56 1953.2) EXISTING HOUSE 3o.z #230 (958.1) \ 4 -956-- `ScP 19yy5,•._.._�-------S 89048'\90" E � PROPOILT SED WELL So , FG..n^ ..nv., CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR PAUL SKOOG OF LOTS 11-13, BLOCK 2, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA l I 9 60- 25 (959.7) MAPLE CLUMP to ) \ \ ..____._. .___.__ _s_. - - 95 34.2 % 24.5 EXISTBdG rouse / o /, I To e\ REMOVED 21.5 M PROPOS I \` (956.1) g54 y�• DRIVEWAI Q ,�� 13 �� 0 PROPOSED 95$' - M I I LO M �. ••342..... 14.0 HOUSE �. \\ / _ ` WALK(C)co M _. ._ N , 250 COVERED TONKA AVE. I PORCH \ (B) 4.67 A -') \ � ) EXISTNJG GARAGE WALKOSED N � TO B .REMOVED ; \ 4.67 958C, J �. J V r , \ 2 9S6 d`° 12.67 _._ _.. .... , .45 0 ......................... \ 952.9 PROPOSED SILT FENCE 95 952.9 \.33 DECK 14" \ LE 1 \ \ (E) \ � MAPLES \ \ \ (955.6) � (957.5 ----------- - 956 -�- 14 T 10„ - ---- --- \\� MAPLES 14 22" 14" 12 12"\ 0 952 0 \ \ 14" MAPLE \ 16" rn' \ MAPLES C6 12" (953.1) - - _ X\ 12"� (946.2) -954- _ -_ -946 �� + - . ------ 0 4 \\ ..... ----------- N �0481 00" W 125.25 ...... . \ SHED COCOCh Crave ' \ \ \ SWING WAIL. I \. \ SET -944---\ SAND 4aDX 0 cOr II \ o - 33.0 __.......... to (951.1) 952.2 \ EXISTINGHOUSE \ \ \ \ #280 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 2, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA. : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea Level datum 910.8 : denotes proposed spot elevation ---917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum - 930 denotes proposed contour Fine Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house and garage, to be removed, spot elevations, topography and trees and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 0 20 40 PC Exhibit D PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (verify) 1) Garage = 958.5 2) Top of foundation 3) Basement 4) Lookout = 953.4 ON S C A L E I N F E E T DATE DESCRIPTION D o -AT p E 1I-� /^� (� R jV ,p R �.,j jV ASSOCIATES, INC. ` CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report ` was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of 'Minnesota. 10 �9 S 6-12-23 PROPOSED HOUSE ADDED DATE 3-2-22 (949.9) JOB No. 23-096 �s ` O\ \ L - - (942.5) \ \ EXISTING HOUSE 3o.z #230 (958.1) \ 4 -956-- `ScP 19yy5,•._.._�-------S 89048'\90" E � PROPOILT SED WELL So , FG..n^ ..nv., CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR PAUL SKOOG OF LOTS 11-13, BLOCK 2, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA l I 9 60- 25 (959.7) MAPLE CLUMP to ) \ \ ..____._. .___.__ _s_. - - 95 34.2 % 24.5 EXISTBdG rouse / o /, I To e\ REMOVED 21.5 M PROPOS I \` (956.1) g54 y�• DRIVEWAI Q ,�� 13 �� 0 PROPOSED 95$' - M I I LO M �. ••342..... 14.0 HOUSE �. \\ / _ ` WALK(C)co M _. ._ N , 250 COVERED TONKA AVE. I PORCH \ (B) 4.67 A -') \ � ) EXISTNJG GARAGE WALKOSED N � TO B .REMOVED ; \ 4.67 958C, J �. J V r , \ 2 9S6 d`° 12.67 _._ _.. .... , .45 0 ......................... \ 952.9 PROPOSED SILT FENCE 95 952.9 \.33 DECK 14" \ LE 1 \ \ (E) \ � MAPLES \ \ \ (955.6) � (957.5 ----------- - 956 -�- 14 T 10„ - ---- --- \\� MAPLES 14 22" 14" 12 12"\ 0 952 0 \ \ 14" MAPLE \ 16" rn' \ MAPLES C6 12" (953.1) - - _ X\ 12"� (946.2) -954- _ -_ -946 �� + - . ------ 0 4 \\ ..... ----------- N �0481 00" W 125.25 ...... . \ SHED COCOCh Crave ' \ \ \ SWING WAIL. I \. \ SET -944---\ SAND 4aDX 0 cOr II \ o - 33.0 __.......... to (951.1) 952.2 \ EXISTINGHOUSE \ \ \ \ #280 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 2, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA. : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea Level datum 910.8 : denotes proposed spot elevation ---917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum - 930 denotes proposed contour Fine Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house and garage, to be removed, spot elevations, topography and trees and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 0 20 40 PC Exhibit D PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (verify) 1) Garage = 958.5 2) Top of foundation 3) Basement 4) Lookout = 953.4 ON S C A L E I N F E E T DATE DESCRIPTION D o -AT p E 1I-� /^� (� R jV ,p R �.,j jV ASSOCIATES, INC. ` CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report ` was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of 'Minnesota. 10 SCALE 1 "=20' 6-12-23 PROPOSED HOUSE ADDED DATE 3-2-22 JOB No. 23-096 Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License umber 12755 23-096 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4 I'-0" 0 LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING: PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION /w SII I�II�I II ■1 RIGS 4T ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" INTERIOR GRE:47 ROOM ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" 1■1 7.6. 6Z'-0" 13'_0• 5096 EGRE66 36 EGfg55 — LA9EgEN7— — — — — I L BATH „ BEDROOM 3 m BEDROOM 2 Fxii I= a LIEN j -p 7x4 WALL "IDE IL - 3x6 BI -WALL ON Ir LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BCALS, 1/4' . I'-0' SOFIA 1262 FNISHED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PC Exhibit E W �yn 7 uigE of 0 0- w w LL � � a d ."•^'• 359 REVI910N- DATI h 01-18-2 4 06-02 FAlD4TION PL4Po �+ ICr WALL ON KITCHENETTE m al 20"xB"—G011G. FOOTMG r — �---------- IS'_6" 1B'_B• - �.0 9'_S" I'_I' 3'_7' 14'-2' - nl I Ut-FINI5HED MECHANICAL/ STORAGE 2x4 WALL 6lSIDE V 9' HIGH ICF WALL ON (9'HIGH ICF FOUNDATION) a - - 20"x0" CO. FOOTING NC 0 70"xB" CQ4C. FOOTING UP � n . I CRS 6" GONG. BLOCK 2.4WALL INS= 0 O a DICN J I- �B m I .9 I CrWALL ON 30'xs" LONG MOOTIMG r — — — ----------------- I ° i U I 2B'_0" -I" II' -3" 34'-S' FAMILY ROOM ISI Ir LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BCALS, 1/4' . I'-0' SOFIA 1262 FNISHED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PC Exhibit E W �yn 7 uigE of 0 0- w w LL � � a d ."•^'• 359 REVI910N- DATI h 01-18-2 4 06-02 FAlD4TION PL4Po KITCHENETTE al I �I I I UNEXCAVATED 2xWALL 4 L INSIDE 9' HIGH L WALL ON a 70"xB" CQ4C. FOOTING I CRS 6" GONG. BLOCK O 4 CRS. B" CCNC. BLOCK X B" GONG. FOOTING I- �B m I I 116" I � i U � I I I �• _ _a L J 36'.0' R'-10' 17.0• 14'-B' Ir LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BCALS, 1/4' . I'-0' SOFIA 1262 FNISHED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PC Exhibit E W �yn 7 uigE of 0 0- w w LL � � a d ."•^'• 359 REVI910N- DATI h 01-18-2 4 06-02 FAlD4TION PL4Po 5'-9'L 4'-I" 1, 1'-3" STAT 030 DH 060 DH 0 v r � I I I I m I I - I I I 1 MASTER BEDROOM p 8-0 L J 1'-4" 10'_10• 4'-3' Q D-0 3 dl r 3-0 9 �^ n. ME W.0 9-0 9- 4 TRIPLE GARAGE DN DH EGRESS D 3060.3 MIDI °"E" Dw � • PANiR1- 9 --®- KITCHEN a COVER 3-4 a DEG DINING m a 0000 Li -0• DH 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (MAIN FLOOR HAS A „ Tv wALL v r_im• �+ 10' I $° CEILING HEIGHT) I o X;�L UpGREAT II IIROOM 11 ------1L----------------TT Va�l—%.;Tl l 34'-9" 1 3-0 3 9 w STUDY I I I m II II BUILT -it � 5'-q'1 I I 0 S A 3030 DN 0 m � 6 + DN 0 DN 3-0 9 X T OH DOOR 16' k T OH DOOR 0 I I I I W"ESD FIORcva e'•6" ❑ r 6 I I I I L a I I I I I I I I I I I I 'MAIN FLOOR WINDOWS NAY£ A RAISED HEADER NEICd4T MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE, 114'. I'-0" SOFT, 1693 PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION l4'-8' A • UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4' = V-0- SBFT. 4W PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION City of Orono SM" Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address2SO T"ovkx .ft/E (P,wt TKooG Prepared by: Date: Get vivo F,t r t 14 T 1 QoW r /NC 6- /2 -2R Tie Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 r Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: RO DCOVE) In the follow ng table, identi y all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Square Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' A 720 S.F. B S.F. Ccolirg S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. 1 Total Prosed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Ci Code Sec 78-1684 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. S.F. 4 Total Lot Area /97 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4) ] Z 2. 82 % Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we) 1 h l� SKu�� of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at o T --,,kc, AJC also referred to as Land Use Application No. LA7-3- QW -AZ (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date ProI1erty Owner A, Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form — January 2423 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we)J2 S4 ['J3 l3 Z ofU [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Z&� k, ,ya. A.r,.- also referred to as Land Use Application No. - Qu03 B? I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disap rov -the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the impr meat pland that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. �-I Z Probe A,Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. *rx*�-��'�`x x ry, x:rrrsk*rxrrxrrrx r,txrxrrrrxrxrx ,A/DJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM 1(we) /6r -J, N '" �N/11W of ZYS Az to [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. l_f�2-qZ 1 (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner roperty Owner Date Date 6// 1�7/z3 / F If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form - January 2023 wxxwx*xxx Wssexxxxxx � ,... , s.xxx==�,.xxxxx �,�,. xxx::xxx------------- rti+exwxx ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM of [print name(s)] [print address) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 25C also referred to as Land Use Application No. L qZ3 _ p3 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property er Property Owner Date Date Z3 If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Farm — January 2023 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at n —I c -n kX Ag'z also referred to as Land Use Application No. Lf) 2-3 - cpoo37 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date rj Owner Date It you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RUN DATE: 06/20/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 05-117-23110006 38 05-117-23130043 38 05-117-23140020 L C DOUGHERTY & M DOUGHERTY JEANNE M BRAUN TRUST JOHN D TIES 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD 3444 EASTLAKE ST 245 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LUCY C DOUGHERTY JEANNE M BRAUN JOHN D TIES MICHAEL T DOUGHERTY 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 245 CRESTVIEW AVE 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FORT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23110007 38 05-117-23130046 38 05-117-23140021 MARK J HEURUNG JEANNE M BRAUN TRUST ET AL STEPHANIE REIMAN 3315 GRAHAM HILL RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 255 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 MARK J HEURUNG JEANNE M BRAUN STEPHANIE REIMAN 3315 GRAHAM HILL RD 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 255 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 FT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23 12 0015 38 05-117-23 13 0050 38 05-117-23 14 0022 STATE OF MINN B W HENNING & R L HENNING KAE PARTNERS LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 245 TONKA AVE 265 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT BRIAN W HENNING KAE PARTNERS LLC ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN REBECCA L HENNING 1400 MAPLEWOOD DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD 245 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 12 0017 38 05-117-2313 0051 38 05-117-23 14 0023 LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TR MARTHA S TOFTELAND N BYSTROM & C BYSTROM 3415 HIGH LA 225 TONKA AVE 275 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 US BANK TRUST MARTHA TOFTELAND NOAH BYSTROM C/O HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC 225 TONKA AVE CHARLENE BYSTROM 3701 REGENT BLVD STE 200 LONG LAKE MN 55356 275 CRESTVIEW AVE IRVING TX 75063 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0012 38 05-117-23 13 0053 38 05-117-23 14 0024 C P FLURY & M B FLURY T G VAUGHAN & N P VAUGHAN THOMAS VERANT 3420 BAYSIDE RD 205 TONKA AVE 285 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHRISTOPHER P FLURY TIMOTHY & NATALIE VAUGHAN THOMAS VERANT MARGARET B FLURY 205 TONKA AVE 285 CRESTVIEW AVE 3420 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0014 38 05-117-23 13 0054 38 05-117-23 14 0025 LYNN W WALSTEDT T M ZIESMER & M T ZIESMER J A VERANT & C A VERANT 3470 BAYSIDE RD 3440 BAYSIDE RD 295 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LYNN W WALSTEDT TODD M & MARIE T ZIESMER JOHN A VERANT 3470 BAYSIDE RD 3440 BAYSIDE RD CYNTHIA A VERANT LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 22060 STRATFORD PL SHOREWOOD MN 55331 38 05-117-23 13 0028 38 05-117-23 13 0055 38 05-117-23 14 0028 M JAMIESON & N JAMIESON COLLEEN N F MANCHESTER TR AG P O SKOOG & S L SKOOG 295 TONKA AVE 210 BEDERWOOD DR 250 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL JAMIESON COLLEEN N F MANCHESTER TR AG PAUL O & SHERRY L SKOOG NATALIE JAMIESON 2815 W 53RD ST 250 TONKA AVE 295 TONKA AVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23130029 38 05-117-23140012 38 05-117-23140029 BARBARA J HUBER STATE OF MINN TERESA WEBBER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 230 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA J HUBER DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT TERESA WEBBER 3390 BAYSIDE RD ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 230 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 05-117-23130030 38 05-117-23140018 38 05-117-23140030 DANA S BRUMITT SCOTT D HOCHSTEDLER BILMA LLC 3400 BAYSIDE RD 290 CRESTVIEW AVE 315 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DANA S BRUMITT SCOTT D HOCHSTEDLER BILMA LLC 3400 BAYSIDE RD 290 CRESTVIEW AVE 315 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0042 38 05-117-23 14 0019 38 05-117-23 14 0031 HUNSLEY FAMILY JT REV TRUST RACHEL CHARD WENDY D SULLIVAN TRUST 3464 EASTLAKE ST 235 CRESTVIEW AVE 325 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK A HUNSLEY RACHEL CHARD WENDY SULLIVAN NANCY E HUNSLEY 235 CRESTVIEW AVE 325 CRESTVIEW AVE 3464 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 06/20/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 05-117-23140033 BARBARA J HUBER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 BARBARA J HUBER 3390 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140039 MATTHEW LAMBRECHT 340 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 MATTHEW LAMBRECHT 340 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140043 THOMAS R BETZ 300 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 THOMAS R BETZ 300 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140049 STATE OF MINN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT ATTN: DEBBIE GURTIN 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST. PAUL MN 55155 38 05-117-23140052 BARBARA JOANNE HUBER 3390 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA JOANNE HUBER 3390 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140055 JEFFREY S MELBY 240 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 JEFFREY S MELBY 240 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140056 J F LEHMEYER & T L LEHMEYER 320 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 JOHN & TRUDY LEHMEYER 320 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140057 LOREN PARKS 350 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 LOREN PARKS 350 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140058 DENNIS LAPPEN/DEANNA LAPPEN 3300 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 DENNIS LAPPEN 3300 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140061 PA&KSSKOOG 280 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 PHILIP & KAREN SKOOG 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140062 SUSAN A M GOHMAN TRUSTEE 330 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 SUSAN A M GOHMAN 330 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140063 ROBIN WEISS GRIERSON 270 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ROBIN WEISS GRIERSON 270 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140067 SCOTT NAISBITT/NANCY FAHIM 3225 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 SCOTT NAISBITT NANCY FAHIM 3225 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140068 COURTNEY R KILL TRUST ET AL 3235 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 COURTNEY R KILL ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KILL 3235 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23140069 MICHAEL & MARILYN HUTHWAITE 3382 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL & MARILYN HUTHWAITE 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 6/20/2023 x R4i JAI% 3235 iV 3225 Wf 3455 3435 3415 3409 34973403 3443 Buffer Size: 500 Map Comments: 250 Tonka Ave 3382 L -9I 0 50 100 200 Feet I I I I I I I I I This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us 235 YJ k4 ED 255 .58 265 75 275 285 270 � Wq 280 295, Y C T ()31N o� r 340 3455 3435 3415 3409 34973403 3443 Buffer Size: 500 Map Comments: 250 Tonka Ave 3382 L -9I 0 50 100 200 Feet I I I I I I I I I This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 06/21/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/29/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 08/28/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: July 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000033, Edwin and Tracey Stephenson, 559 Park Lane, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for a new, lakeside deck. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicants currently have a grade -level lakeside patio extending approximately 7.5 -feet from the home. They are requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to construct a 14'x 32.5' deck off of the main level of the home with a stair to grade over the patio. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the existing conditions as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the property's alignment with neighbors and orientation to the lake create difficulties in expanding the home and or constructing a functionally -sized deck on the lake side. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 and 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1B DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' 34.5' No Change North Side 10' 18.7' No Change South Side 10' 14.3' No Change Lakeshore 75' 97' 95' Average Lakeshore The current home is conforming. The proposed deck will encroach approximately 6.5 -feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line or 95 -feet from the OHWL. FILE #LA23-000033 17 July 2023 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-330 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1B DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 19,210 s.f. (0.44 acre) 100'@ 75'/ 100'@ OHWL Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Cove Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 19,210 s.f. (0.44 acre) Allowed: 3,842 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 2,881 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 2,881 s.f. (15%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 4,802.5 s.f. 4,570 s.f. 4,604 s.f. Tier 1 19,210 s.f. (25 %) (23.8%) (24%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Code Section 78-1279 The north west lakeside corner of the existing home is set at the average lakeshore setback. The setback line runs diagonally across the property allowing for a shallow deck to be constructed on the lakeside of the home on the southwest corner. The permitted footprint (with a depth between 7.5 — 8 feet) would not result in a very functional outdoor living space. The applicants have requested a variance to permit a 14 -foot deck which results in an encroachment into the average lakeshore setback between 6.5 feet on the north and approximately 3.5 feet on the south. The deck expansion does not appear to impact views of the lake from either neighboring property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. FILE #LA23-000033 17 July 2023 Page 3 of 4 According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The property includes difficulties in its topography and the orientation of adjacent homes. The average lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to construct a deck on this property is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit the deck and stair in the proposed location partially within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to the lakeshore the existing vegetative screening, the topography, and adjacent properties. The request is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The current owners did not build the home. The linear nature of the shoreline resulting in neighboring home locations all in a continuous line prevent changes or expansions of the home on the lake side. The circumstances are unique to the property; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is requested in order to permit construction of the lakeside deck to which will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are an allowed use in the LR -113 District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The home location and design does not permit construction of a functional deck depth or allow for an access to grade. The home location, the property's topography and orientation with respect to the lakeshore and the adjacent homes create difficulties for the Owners in improving the property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood on the lake side. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The linear shoreline and generally linear placement of neighboring homes applies to the other homes in the immediate neighborhood. FILE #LA23-000033 17 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicants' submitted information supports the request for the average lakeshore setback variance and they have indicated it is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The property has an existing patio and can support a deck extending approximately 8 -feet from the home. However, the permitted depth would not be functional, the applicants have provided documentation indicating that the requested variance is the minimum necessary, and does not merely serve as a convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. If the planning commission recommends approval, the applicant should revise their site plan to show the proposed deck footprint and the proposed stair footprint. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map 6/26/23, 11:33 AM Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary 06/21/2023 559 Park LN Orono, MN 55356 0611723410044 LA23-000033 Property Owner Name: EDWIN L STEPHENSON III Address: ES 1 TRUST Name: Edwin Stephenson Applicant: Company: Address: 559 Park Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 tagstephensonl23@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Tracey Stephenson edwinlstephenson@gmail.com Associated Contact: patrick felten patrick@gordon-James.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Deck Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87321880&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 Request In order to construct a deck on the back (lakeshore side) of our home, we are requesting the following: • An average lakeshore setback variance, and • A reconfiguration of hardcover requirements to remain near current level of less than 25%. Background Edwin & Tracey Stephenson purchased the home at 559 Park Lane in 2021. The previous homeowner did not disclose the hardcover requirements, the existing hardcover percentage, or the average lakeshore setback requirements. Currently, the home includes a pervious patio accessible from the basement on the lakeshore side of the home. This is the only way to access the backyard or lake without walking around from the front of the house. Edwin has been diagnosed with cancer and is undergoing aggressive chemotherapy treatments with severe fatigue. During treatment and as we age, we would like to be able to access and enjoy the outside, lakeshore side, from the main level of the home. As we consider the deck size, we would like to have sufficient space for sitting at a table for our five (5) children, their spouses, and grandchildren. In order to achieve a reasonably sized deck, we are requesting an average setback variance and will rearrange hardcover (as described below) to provide enough hardcover allowance for the project. At Patrick Felton of Gordon James' recommendation, we met with Melanie Curtis on May 30, 2023, to review the City of Orono hardcover and setback requirements. The following documents were provided: • As -built survey (09/21/2016) with lakeshore setback variance. • Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (09/01/2015) showing 24.26% hardcover. • Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (09/21/2016) showing 24.49% hardcover. In general, our strategy is to reconfigure the hardcover requirements by (a) reducing the size of the driveway allowing us to (b) expand the area over the patio for a reasonable deck. The area of the driveway to be reduced was used by the previous homeowner for boat and trailer storage and is not needed by us. We intend to turn this area into flower beds and expanded grass. We do not plan to significantly change the hardcover. Hardcover Calculations Pictures of the existing driveway S.F. to be removed is as follows: The above portion of the driveway contains three areas as follows: Area 2.67' Area 1=b* h = 12'x 10' = 120 S.F. Area 2 = %*(b * h) = %2*(8' * 14.67') = 58.67 S.F. Area 3=%*(b*h)=%*(2.67'*10')=13 S.F. Total Area = Area 1 + Area 2 + Area 3 = —191 S.F. The above measurements are intentionally conservative, knowing that more of the driveway will be removed. Using the Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (09/21/2016), the existing hardcover percentage is 24.49%. The total lot area is 19,210 S.F. The available 0.51% would total —97 S.F. Using the Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (09/21/2016), there are a few corrections since September 2016: Key to Survey Hardcover Items Total (S.F.) Comment H Wood Retaining Wall 15 S.F. This is no longer considered hardcover and can be excluded. K First 100 S.F. pervious patio/deck 100 S.F. This was not identified as excludable on 9/15/2016 worksheet. N Stone retaining wall 20 S.F. This is no longer considered hardcover and can be excluded. Tota 1 135 S.F. The available hardcover (< 25%) can be calculated as follows: Description Total (S.F.) Available 0.51% 97 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (09/21/2016) corrections 135 Reconfigure hardcover from driveway 191 Total Available 423 S.F. The deck would be over the existing patio, 230 S.F. The requested deck size is 14' x 32 %' for a total of 455 S.F. The needed square footage can be calculated as follows, 455 — 230 = 225 S.F. This is less than the available 423 S.F. and would leave (423-225) = 198 S.F. of extra hardcover. The new hardcover percentage would be calculated as follows: 25% - 198/19210*100 = 23.97% An updated Hardcover Calculation Worksheet is provided. Deck Location The deck location is shown below in RED: W °: a �PpING g6g:L LO 0 95g•2 k] S�� v ❑ tg�? 15.3 CCC333 � CO r� G 2� �1 �� r .�,SOd�s a' �. w II eli �t5 crow 25 �� `Od vi co c� sL °..' 1LJ f Cr)0. fl }SS 1 O n " / :4k -1 = II.-. O ✓ g$�.9i 1 0Iq C14 L.Li "•. <c of f� 1 32• us 1 � rO i1 ) l M ( 1 CO — , Owl i �f Cr J LO I r tP War Ch i] en Deck Size We are requesting the deck size of 14' x 32 %' for a total of 455 S.F. We intend for this S.F. to include a staircase to the backyard. We are working with Patrick Felton, Gordon James, on the detail design. The size was chosen to allow for a reasonable walkway and large table for seating, given the number of family members. The following picture demonstrates the size of the requested deck (roped area) and the current tables on the lower patio: A simple design, including location of stairs would be as follows: 14 feet Edge of Eat in kitchen Edge of house Need to consider (pitch, rise, etc.) Limit Deck S.F. to "455 total run and location of stairs within S.F. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance To build the requested deck size, we are requesting a variance to the average Lakeshore setback. The requested deck would not impede the views of our neighbors on either side. On the north side, Terry and Suzanne Johnson's current view at 543 Park Lane is as follows: View straight from house (West) View from house toward proposed deck area. Note that the deck (roped area) is barely visible and does not obstruct the view of the lake through the trees. On the south side, Scott and Sandy Aldren's current view at 567 Park Lane is as follows: View straight from house (West) View from house toward proposed deck area. Note that the deck (roped area) is not visible. Both neighbors have agreed to write letters and/or testify that the deck will not interfere with their view, and likely will not be visible at all. If this were not true, we would not wish to proceed with the deck as proposed. 6/26/23, 11:32 AM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000033 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: We plan to use the proposed deck in a reasonable manner: to more easily access the backyard and lakefront from the main level of the home, as well as enjoy the lake view. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The location of the structures on the property and the configuration of the lot were not created by the property owner. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The visual impact resulting from the deck proposed within the average lakeshore variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The deck will not impact views from the lake, and it will not appear to be more visually obtrusive than the existing buildings on the property. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance request. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This condition is not applicable. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This condition is not applicable. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The home currently sits within the 75 -foot setback and the deck is not going to change the setback from the lake. The proposed deck will not affect the lake view of the adjacent property owners. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87321880&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 6/26/23, 11:32 AM Permit List I Citizenserve 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The proposed addition will not change the current setbacks from the lake or property lines. The location of the existing home is unique. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: We plan to use the deck to enhance our access to the lake from the main level of our home. This will increase our enjoyment of the lake and our home and alleviate difficulties that have come with a cancer diagnosis and treatment. The deck is located in a place that serves the intent and goals of the ordinance by minimizing visual impacts on the lake. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The proposed project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Granting the variance will relieve the practical difficulty of not being able to access the lakeside and backyard from the main level of our home while allowing us to also enjoy the lake view from the deck. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87321880&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 TIM & JOAN O'DONNELL OF LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXISTING HOUSE�-11 •?M ME��pKp . \ \ #543 5 Eo \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SAVERAGE ETBACK LBUI DING \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 BOULDER RET. /L (M) -_(964.3) j964.2�, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 59.7 1 ' (963.67/ `965 22.0 ( 962 (961b)(961.9)\ / N (959.4)9\ 1 ( (964.9) \ \ \ \ \ (960.5) 30 'INV=(972.6) W yy I hereby certify that this plan, specification, e report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1 / 965.3) O ra "T , /1 w �.YCo I p aN�t� (964.1) 'o J -t 4 2016 0CT ' \ C L JOB N0. 16-347 D CITY OF ORONO , Q BENCHMARK: I 1% \ MANHOLE RIM=(970.6) ' (970.7) (964.5) INV=(968.3) y° N (96 �1i!' 966 i �g6y.9) '}rrn A " 1 01 1 CD BLACKTOP ,l DRIVEWAY (B) (964.9) Cp 5" N N (966.5) f�n DGE OF + \ \ cr 2 0 5k war N .... TRAVEL V ' GARAGE (959.5) I (965.4) o \ \ (939 \ \ \ \ \ \(958.8) k959.8) y rn \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (959.4)9 \ \\ \ \ \ \ 9 7) RET. WL EXISTING ANG ER ( 958.2)OU 1 / (�58.� (956.6) a /.r & 929.4 CONTOUR --""11 \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ . 45 HOUSE LINE (O.H.W.) �' \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ � I -`' / .,q ®/ ® o #559 (A)\ ( ) \ T/H \ ��g5 N (956.2) �} \ 1 \ O Y STONE 1 75' PATIO �� } \ WALL I. -SETBACK (K) LOWER Y �t LINE FLOOR=573 \ ,i c4 I \ ( ) 40,'3 TO ' \ 1 LAKE I I I I \ (955.6) 1 1 (F 4 \11� �, ` 5 9) ;1g5 � \ oS6 \ oZn ^S (95 .9) -i3� �� --(958.1) 1 (9565).,°•� s � � 68- yy I hereby certify that this plan, specification, e report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SCALE 1 "=20' / 965.3) O ra "T , /1 w �.YCo I p aN�t� (964.1) 'o J orD4.9) ' \ N (C) O O JOB N0. 16-347 , Q N� V p I 1% \ (964.3) �� � 33 3 m (J) (964.5) rn NET. y° N (96 01r3A w g63 Oi_ X963 5) 4q.� _ (960.9) 0-15 _ 964 Q1) NPu �N o9 P oRNE 50U�N ' 1960 11 1 a .V SVt1N`,10 1 (G) MINNETONKA 4.5 , .� 956�g5a1 \ \\ \ ( ) > (95.2) \ SU V E�Y 5 \� (953.7) x(955,3) - 1 (� j� o\I \N \ \ \ '(954.1) 9y3.� EXISTING N O R T H ARM �\ \ \\ HOUSE \ \ \ \ (953.2) #567 \ \ A o()4l®o DECK Zak ....-....- (951.4) (953.1) �a53 41 (953.9) of z LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lots 9 and 10, Block 6, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK i : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ----917---: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, spot elevations, topography and all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DA I t DLtiUNII' I IUN GRONBERG 8c ASSOCIATES , INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, e report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SCALE 1 "=20' DATE 9-21-16 JOB N0. 16-347 Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 16-347 559 Psr{cl.ane_, 2015- 8 IOoI A-j45drVGy ASPHALT f-HINGLE5 \ PLATC HST \^DVC HD. 6" TRIM BOARD 6 FA561A WARD 6` FRIEZE BOAR) HARDIE 60ARD a BATTEN 51D�R6 f \ F -R. LINE % \ PLATE HST. 128H fW. Y F G+' AEG "F < GE BUILDING LEN H ENERGY �MSPLUJ L-IALI.E Er, METED _e LDI£- \To GERTIRCATE RINEL.ECTRICAL ANDpOSTEDONIO - ---��s..,o.•.« MALIN PANEL ATTIP�I:OF rT .ir affm,.vrm Al - __ - ^-\'\Aa ­EA- e'G`�G44'.�icn _ HORIZONTAL. '�j -- -- - -- -- HARDIE 510ING - _ _ - I(/ ❑ I { T—_ -- - \ 4 CORNER - I �_ _ _ _ --, - �❑ L -LI ❑❑ m 6 TRIM ARGUM1D - - I NIIYDO^s --- DOORS (FRONT ONLY; - - - - - \ \FLR LINE STONE VENEER FRONT Ft-EVATION SLALE 1/4' = I' -O ASPHALT 5HINI�LES - STONE TRIM AT ANDOW '2 I 10 12 MATE FIST. MATE ❑ W 7 LL \Y\DA HO. H6T. I I I - - PLATE Vvfi. 11 � 6' FASCIA EOARD zDls-fze . \FLR LINE DOORS - \- PLATE HST. UPPE \N7N 1-D. HST. - - HORIZONTAL 21 13 V N � L 5IDINS - m = q\ FL. fi fl\ GARAGE FLR. - BONU5 LYEf loll CAII - -'--AIN L- /_ ` r G.iF �_ ._ - -- f;.. 5TCVXfW%5 27a MILIMC!, 30 DAMI - - � of 6 A_ ROr--ill.;- tl`! :CARD 128H fW. Y F G+' AEG "F < GE BUILDING LEN H ENERGY �MSPLUJ L-IALI.E Er, METED _e LDI£- \To GERTIRCATE RINEL.ECTRICAL ANDpOSTEDONIO - ---��s..,o.•.« MALIN PANEL ATTIP�I:OF rT .ir affm,.vrm Al - __ - ^-\'\Aa ­EA- e'G`�G44'.�icn _ HORIZONTAL. '�j -- -- - -- -- HARDIE 510ING - _ _ - I(/ ❑ I { T—_ -- - \ 4 CORNER - I �_ _ _ _ --, - �❑ L -LI ❑❑ m 6 TRIM ARGUM1D - - I NIIYDO^s --- DOORS (FRONT ONLY; - - - - - \ \FLR LINE STONE VENEER FRONT Ft-EVATION SLALE 1/4' = I' -O ASPHALT 5HINI�LES - \ \\ (\ YJA V. Y$T,\ '2 I ,OF- 0E- MATE FIST. MATE W 7 LL \Y\DA HO. H6T. I I I - - PLATE Vvfi. 11 � 6' FASCIA EOARD zDls-fze . \FLR LINE DOORS - \- PLATE HST. UPPE \N7N 1-D. HST. - - HORIZONTAL 21 13 V N � L 5IDINS - m = q\ FL. fi fl\ GARAGE FLR. - .AN7 GAN NOT /AR TZ:`^ ARGLST TO .L.o i' Tr.e n = �- rRL= \ .LAND nGs ¢S¢ RTH>\ l eC�L .,�♦aL ernuwar-55'rt nANDR _-AL- F ,R> TG nA_L PLATE H&T. - - - \ co �a m__ /_RIF✓A-- _Ac R sl2o 'I =��Jb��`r m m -- F Pj Of Off. 01. O FLR LINE\ \ I � .� 0 F_AT= HST - - D. 11 -- 1 I cT\ NOTIr,E � 2�- 11 �RAGK T5 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MUST BE OBTAINED I --------- % - - ----i BEFORE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED I 'r__�-_-_---- I I -LT-N. 1 i'1 f1�� �fU�2`utY(C I W _ PEflPAtT �; It.L 11 6 A<A El IF%%ZM SNO 3 1 - J L/ T TARTED :Y. - I !� -r I I THR IES DAYS i I tiI/, T it /✓� ��T4'Q 1'1 1 OR IFWOgY, I3 Slt5PeNOFD FOR 190 DA(3 I -- -' I I // I CONSTRUCTION, SAFETY OR ZONING LIQ VIOLATIDN9 MUST BE CORRECTED UPON NOTIC9 fl - II II ENERGY COMPLIANCE BUILDING - CERTIFICATE SHALL BE COMPLETED 14D POSTED OWOR IN E' ECTRICAL m TEST TO BE PERFORMEDGY SECTION 403.22 FOORK LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THERMAL ENVELOPE. OUE!�� ERFORM1tEORGY PLATE 1.ST \ \ \\ (\ YJA V. Y$T,\ ' I \ X{ W 7 � A I I - - PLATE Vvfi. ron; H7. HST.\ —4' TRIM AFGUND zDls-fze . Y1INDOA5 Z ip DOORS - P_4* CORNER m a UPPE e0A¢D3 i FL-. LN=-\ \ '\ I � I I - - _ FLAN NUTAEIEK- Vvfi. zDls-fze . SCUAFE FOOTAGE — HOR, -AL (1.B+SD.YN1 21 13 VINYL 5'DINS _ - _\- -. - /a"" ,'i\� 2 N�F.iN 133 BONU5 LYEf loll CAII - -'--AIN L- /_ ` r G.iF �_ ._ - -- f;.. 5TCVXfW%5 27a MILIMC!, 30 DAMI - - � of 6 City of Orono �otio Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: S59 �ar k i Edwcyl E Irate S-�cev` l�AFSHOO't` Prepared by: w� rt S n� l Dat 6/Z61 20Z3 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75 -foot setback or split at thin 7r,' cathnrk linco anri r;alri ilatP hnrricover sauare footage Separately for each portion. Key to Surve Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet Exam le (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. qZ$ ZO S.F. B 1 ,'V W C l Z 4 S 4 S.F. S.F. D V 2-5 S.F. E c- 2 Lf S.F. F 2 O S.F. G S.F. H S. F. l y S.F. IT77 S.F. K rg, p S.F. L 5 e S.F. Mr Re S. F. N G l S.F. C S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. H S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. U S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover { S.F. Excludable hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): d f i n �`� a I S.F. = 1 h S.F. r // S969-Aliz- 1'7 S.F. 1CR+ t0 SF V�Wva 00 S.F. M f N/�24:! t S"}'r9YtQ 1 G t -2 O S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover Z 7 1 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 O S.F. 4 Total Lot Area ! R Z l Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)j Z 3 7 -! % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: January 2023 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono mL°No Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: s�- mar K LGt� (�dw I'v) r Prepared by: w kI A Date: & �o ZD Z3 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) ier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75 -foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Surve Total (Square Feet (Example) _Garage) ( (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A b LL 20 S.F. BC O S.F. � D T S.F. S. F. E G Z S.F. F Q S.F. H to a I S.F. 1 S.F. ( t S.F_ K i D S.R LII 1a S.F. M " S.F. N S.F. O V 1 D E — 2305E 2 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S. F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 749--75- S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sac 78-1684): Word r'rta(t IS S.F. ash Gt b♦ I S.F. y �- 100 100 S.F. R�illnl y4c, I Sofa ZO S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover Z 7 t S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 21 O S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4)1 Z-3. 91 Last Updated: January 2023 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 -a , k +� •n 3' s I [ t •. Iry � � !� F= �� � •' + irk i y� ��� � F� •_�� � �` u F Y - h . s j •. _ ,. a �. . !� 1 . H Y. • r i ' �'•. 7, w .. j. •: +� V Citi N'� Z 16 all 06 • �^'4,i fiyer'• wM i�t •N�� "<;`:L•�� `��� �:i , � � • ` {� �� �"r •~ y,`'• 1 -.1 'i ii{{ a- �j *r-'•r�i,� ' ++ ,•T" 8,1Z I IL 6 i•.�i7sii��R� 1 + •tikJot� �.-�R1�1.. Rii�.` ►►. � � `��ti_ +-�ai J ��1.`{.L�]e. 1 lop •' }• *� ■ 38 06-117-23 410001 38 06-117-23 410060 38 06-117-23 410095 RICHARD R RUDD ANDY COHEN & MARY COHEN SCOTT M WELLMAN 607 PARK LA 4100 ELM ST HOLLY L WELLMAN LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410016 38 06-117-23 410061 38 06-117-23 410096 MATTHEW ARNOLD COPPOCK LORI ANN MELANDER MITCH JOHNSEN CATHERINE LYNN COPPOCK 550 PARK LA JULIE JOHNSEN 485 PARK AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 4075 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410040 38 06-117-23 410064 38 06-117-23 410099 LOIS M FLANNERY SCOTT M WELLMAN LORI ANN MELANDER 525 PARK LA HOLLY L WELLMAN 550 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410043 38 06-117-23 410072 38 06-117-23 410102 TERRY R JOHNSON BRADY LUNDBLAD SCOTT MACGREGOR SUZANNE MARIE JOHNSON 4030 ELM ST KELSEY MACGREGOR 543 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 537 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410044 38 06-117-23 410080 38 06-117-23 410103 EDWIN L STEPHENSON III KYLE M KINGSLEY HP MINNESOTA I LLC TRACEY STEPHENSON CANDICE P YAGER 120 S RIVERSIDE PLAZA 559 PARK LA 615 MINNETONKA HGLD LA SUITE 2000 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CHICAGO IL 60606 38 06-117-23 410045 38 06-117-23 410084 38 06-117-23 410104 DARRELL & SANDRA ALDEN ROBERT ALAN DURLAND ZACHARY C STALOCH 567 PARK LA 594 PARK LA 4081 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410046 38 06-117-23 410085 38 06-117-23 410106 BRENT J TEELE TRUST CITY OF ORONO MATTHEW D FRITZ 577 PARK LA 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY KRISTINE FRITZ LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 4055 ELM ST ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410047 38 06-117-23 410086 38 06-117-23 410110 GINA R & STEWART L HANSEN CITY OF ORONO MICHAEL D HUDDY 583 PARK LA 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY 4119 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410048 38 06-117-23 410093 38 06-117-23 410111 SHANE R & KRISTINE M RUDD E D & M D SMITH KYLE WERREMEYER 601 PARK LA 507 PARK LANE SABRINA WERREMEYER LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 480 LINDEN AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410049 38 06-117-23 410094 38 06-117-23 410113 JUSTIN J MAISER DAVID H SIEGEL CATHERINE A MEYER ELIZABETH MAISER 4111 OAK ST 493 PARK AVE 4604 WOODDALE AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 EDINA MN 55424 38 06-117-23 44 0003 MARK JUNDT/JENNIFER JUNDT RANDALL JUNDT/KATHRYN JUNDT 650 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0005 MATTHEW WILLETTE NICOLE WILLETTE 649 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0006 RICHARD H SPEETER 659 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0014 BENJAMIN GAMBONI JACKIE GAMBONI 630 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0015 MARK JUNDT/JENNIFER JUNDT RANDALL JUNDT/KATHRYN JUNDT 650 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0017 KATHY RUDD 607 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 6/22/2023 445 I ti'I 458 0 lupi 465 elm 1-0 0 — {�I�I 480 48o d SMS 485 nFl Q Y 4111 K 49 499 Yr. F 521, ti. M 75 53 71"� ., 4081 (14ry 4140 o� W 4030 — rf1 St SQ4 :b7 {dL 577 {4fi1 'lass 83 wn 615 41 601 {eal r.fl7 648 650 0) O Gd0 9.. GO 9) 679 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 559 Park Lane This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us