HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-26-2015 Council PacketEntire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 1 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 2 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 25
ROLL CALL
The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor
Lili Tod McMillan, Council Members Jim Cornick, Jr., Lizz Levang, Aaron Printup, and Dennis Walsh.
Representing Staff were City Administrator Jessica Loftus, Finance Director Ron Olson, Community
Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Senior Planner Michael Gaffron, City Planner Melanie Curtis,
Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards, City Attorney Soren Mattick, Consulting City
Engineer David Martini, and Recorder Jackie Young.
Mayor McMillan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Item Nos. 7, 8, 10, 13, and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda.
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
*2. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 27, 2015
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono City Council meeting of
April 27, 2015, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*3. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OF APRIL 27, 2015
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono City Council work session of
April 27, 2015, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC HEARING – 7:00 P.M.
4. ANNUAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT
Public Works Director & City Engineer Edwards stated tonight is an opportunity to inform the public on
the status of Orono’s permitting process for its NPDES Phase II stormwater permit as well as gather any
input and meet the statutory requirement for an annual update.
Edwards stated this is a federal program run by the Environmental Protection Agency, which runs the
national pollution discharge elimination system. Underneath the EPA, there is the State of Minnesota and
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, who oversees the MS4 permit that is issued to the City
regulating how the City’s stormwater system is operated. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District also
plays a role in the City’s stormwater and water quality in general. At the city level Orono has a surface
water management plan, which is dated 2011, and outlines how the City takes care of its stormwater.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 3 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 25
4. ANNUAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT
(continued)
Edwards stated stormwater has both local and global impacts through a decline in biodiversity, habitat
loss, increased flooding, aesthetics, human health and a decline in drinking water quality. As a result,
there is a focus on the national, state and local levels to look at stormwater and how human beings interact
with that stormwater or create it.
The City’s basic requirements are to have a stormwater pollution prevention program, which includes best
management practices that are used across the nation. As part of the requirements, an annual report is
required to be provided to the Watershed District; an ordinance must be developed regulating stormwater,
which Orono has done; and a stormwater system map must be created of the City’s natural stormwater as
well as those manmade features that have been built to carry it.
The six control measures under the MS4 permit include: public education and outreach, public
participation and involvement, creation of an illicit discharge detection and elimination program,
construction site stormwater runoff control, post-construction stormwater management, pollution
prevention, and good housekeeping for municipal operations.
Typical pollutants include construction erosion, random things that flow into the stormwater system, ice
and snow removal from salt and sand, and grass clippings; all of which ultimately make it into the lakes
and streams.
Edwards stated stormwater solutions start with individual homeowner decisions and people understanding
how their activities impact the lakes and streams. Edwards stated other solutions include rain gardens and
people properly maintaining vegetation on their property.
2014 compliance activities include articles in the spring and fall City newsletters, including stormwater
information on the City’s website, links to other sites that have stormwater information, implementation
of a grass and leaf disposal program, Christmas tree disposal program, construction debris collection,
erosion control inspections, street sweeping, and culvert repairs. Edwards noted in 2014 the Public
Works Department instituted a street sweeping sampling regiment where some of the debris is tested in a
lab to see what the phosphorus load is.
The City did receive a new MS4 permit that was issued in 2013, which covers the period from 2013 to
2018. Changes required as part of that new permit included more formal documentation, identification of
enforcement response procedures, formalization of the City’s education and outreach plan, creation of an
illicit detection and elimination plan, and evaluation of the program’s effectiveness. Edwards noted an
audit was performed in April of 2015 and showed that the City was not in compliance with several items
contained in the permit. Those items mainly related to not formally publishing the required
documentations.
2015 implementation activities include the publication of the City’s emergency response procedures, the
City’s training documentation, and publication of the City’s illicit discharge program manual. In
addition, the City needs to update its stormwater management plan since it was written in 2011 and had a
series of projects that took the City out to the year 2016. The new plan will need to outline what the City
intends to do proactively after the year 2016.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 4 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 25
4. ANNUAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT
(continued)
Mayor McMillan opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
There were no public comments regarding this item.
Mayor McMillan closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
Council Member Levang asked if Mr. Edwards was surprised to find that the City was out of compliance
on a couple of items.
Edwards stated he discovered it approximately two weeks prior to the notice. Edwards stated the City got
behind due to staff turnover and that the documents created by Bolton & Menk were sent to people who
left soon after. Edwards stated eventually those documents reached his desk and those items will now be
addressed.
The City Council took no formal action on this item.
LMCD REPORT – GABRIEL JABBOUR, REPRESENTATIVE
Jabbour reported the docks are in place at Big Island. Jabbour stated late last fall during cleanup they
found a number of deer carcasses that had been killed and thrown over the cliff. In addition, people are
finding a number of coyotes who are missing one of their paws due to traps. Jabbour indicated this is not
necessarily occurring in the park but on Big Island generally. Jabbour stated the DNR is working on it as
well as some of the residents. Jabbour stated in his view this is being done by people who are either
familiar with Big Island or live on Big Island.
Jabbour stated as it relates to the LMCD, he took on this position because he felt that there was a fair
amount of housekeeping that needed to be done. Approximately 35 percent of Lake Minnetonka borders
Orono, and as a result, Orono has always had a very strong opinion on how Lake Minnetonka should be
maintained and what should happen on the lake.
Jabbour indicated he has been working hard on building partnerships with some of Orono’s sister cities
that are committed to Lake Minnetonka beyond just the clerical aspect of the LMCD. Jabbour noted in
October of 2014, Jabbour mentioned to the LMCD Executive Committee that the majority of their Board
members were totally unaware of their strategic plan, which resulted in the Board trying to amend the
plan. Jabbour stated when he was appointed to the Board; they decided to have a mediator manage the
process.
Jabbour reported the LMCD is currently going through their budget process and that it is his feeling the
LMCD should reduce their budget by 10 percent. The LMCD moved its offices to the City of Mound and
had a rent reduction of approximately $20,000. Jabbour stated even with that savings, the LMCD
proposed to increase its budget by three percent, which is typical of most government agencies. Jabbour
stated the LMCD is working on a proposed budget that will be sent out to the cities and that in his view
they have enough votes on the Board to make sure that Orono’s objectives, goals, and vision will be
shared by others. Jabbour stated in his view the Mayor of Orono should initiate some dialogue with the
Mayors of the other LMCD cities.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 5 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 25
LMCD REPORT – GABRIEL JABBOUR, REPRESENTATIVE (continued)
Jabbour stated a few months ago he personally requested the MBA program at the Carlson School of
Business to conduct a survey of the City’s brand name. Jabbour stated Orono has always been concerned
about its name brand and the quality of its brand, which has resulted in the City receiving hundreds of
acres in donation. The results of that survey will be given to the LMCD Board and Orono this
Wednesday at the LMCD meeting. Jabbour stated to his understanding City Staff was surveyed as well
as the Orono Mayor. Jabbour stated he also made sure the LMA members were surveyed as well as lake
service providers and the water patrol. Jabbour stated the results of that survey will likely bring about
some changes in how the LMCD conducts business in the future.
Jabbour stated he and Jay Green sit on the Initiative Foundation and that they are attempting to figure out
which entity should be given a grant for combatting AIS. Jabbour indicated $4.4 million is available for
new ideas in dealing with AIS that have not been done before. Jabbour stated the Watershed District
presented a three-point plan, which would have a profound effect on Orono. The Watershed District has
proposed approaching all cities abutting a body of water and asked them to pass ordinances regulating
AIS. As part of the ordinance, the city’s police department would ticket individuals that are found to have
failed the inspection but yet still launch their boats.
Jabbour stated there are approximately 62,000 inspections on Lake Minnetonka each year but that he
cannot fathom someone driving to a site miles away from where they want to launch to get inspected and
then have Orono’s Department seek them out and give them a ticket after they have launched. Jabbour
stated it will be confusing if one city says yes to the program but other cities do not agree to it. Jabbour
stated in his view the local police departments are not the appropriate entity to be performing the
inspections.
Levang asked if the poaching on Big Island is new or whether it increased last year.
Jabbour stated this is the first year he has seen it and that it is hard to see the carcass of a whole animal
being wasted just so someone can get their antlers.
McMillan asked if there is anything new on the harvesting program.
Jabbour stated there was a major area where milfoil was being harvested but is now being chemically
treated. Jabbour stated his question to the LMCD was, when that is taken into consideration, why is the
LMCD still spending more each year for harvesting. Jabbour indicated he would like to see that looked at
closer and that Staff is currently compiling that information. Jabbour stated in his view the LMCD needs
to put one harvester aside for a while.
Jabbour stated another item the LMCD will be looking at closer is funding just some of the depreciation
instead of a lot of the depreciation. Jabbour stated in his view if the LMCD retires one harvester for a
year; they might have a different depreciation schedule.
Jabbour noted Tom Lowe is no longer willing to act as the bay captain for Carmen Bay and that Carmen
Bay will not be chemically treated this year. Jabbour indicated the cities of Excelsior and Greenwood
agreed to have a lake improvement district, which was an idea that was shared with their Councils as an
alternative to the residents approaching the City asking for money every year. Jabbour stated in that
situation the residents will create their own board, create a budget, and the money will be divided among
the residents. Jabbour stated they are also thinking about doing that in other bays.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 6 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 25
LMCD REPORT – GABRIEL JABBOUR, REPRESENTATIVE (continued)
McMillan asked if that is St. Albans Bay.
Jabbour indicated it is. Jabbour noted the City has to have a public access in order to qualify for the
program. Jabbour stated if one city encompasses the whole bay, they could do it, but if there are several
cities encompassing the bay, all the cities have to agree. If only one city wants to participate, then they
have to approach the County to work with just that specific city. Jabbour stated he does see it happening
in more bays because the bay captains are running out of steam as far as raising money.
Council Member Printup asked how the first harvester came to be on the lake.
Jabbour stated in 1988, milfoil was discovered on Lake Minnetonka and people became concerned. An
Orono citizen, Erwin Jacobs, asked a handful of his friends to contribute money towards the harvesters,
which is how they came to be donated to the LMCD. Jabbour stated he is a strong proponent for having
the citizens assist voluntarily and that Orono has been a big recipient of donations of park land and other
items. For a number of years Orono made a voluntary contribution towards the harvester. Jabbour stated
the minute something is put into the system; it is automatically increased by three percent each year.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS – BRUCE LEMKE, REPRESENTATIVE
Lemke stated he has nothing to report but would be available to answer questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY
REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE
NO. 146
City Planner Curtis noted at the previous Council meeting Staff presented a draft ordinance for discussion
amending Chapter 86 as it relates to land alteration permits and survey requirements. Staff has prepared a
revised draft ordinance for Council review. The revised draft ordinance accomplishes the following:
1. A housekeeping change to add sign permits and remove water well permits;
2. Establishes a requirement for a separate zoning permit for land alteration and/or hardcover
installation to be issued to the individual conducting the land alteration and/or hardcover
installation with the building permit at the time of building permit issuance;
3. Allows for a site plan prepared by a licensed professional to be submitted in the place of an
updated survey for building and grading permits; and
4. Provides for an exemption for projects of smaller magnitude that meets certain defined
minimum criteria.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 7 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 25
5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY
REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE
NO. 146 (continued)
Staff has suggested the criteria in No. 4 as a response to the Council’s direction. This language allows the
City Engineer to exempt the site plan or survey requirement prepared by a licensed professional if there is
an existing survey on file, if the project is smaller than 200 square feet, and if the project location exceeds
the minimum setback requirement. This exemption would be available to properties which are outside the
Shoreland Overlay and Stormwater Quality Districts and which exceed two acres in acre so that
hardcover and structural coverage limitations would not be a factor.
Staff recommends approval of the draft ordinance. The City Council should review and discuss the
proposed amendments.
McMillan asked what the Stormwater Quality Overlay District is.
Curtis indicated that is the City’s hardcover zone.
McMillan asked if that dovetails with the Shoreland Overlay District.
Curtis stated that extends beyond the Shoreland Overlay District because it includes the RPUD as well as
the industrial district.
Printup stated he likes the fact that this ordinance is getting away from requiring a professional surveyor
on smaller projects to make it have a less financial impact. Printup stated what they are talking about here
and what he would like to see happen might be a conversation for another day, but that he would like to
build in more flexibility for the lots under two acres.
Curtis stated adding in more flexibility would require additional discussion to determine what the
Council’s tolerance is for detailed surveys or what type of information the Council would be looking for.
Curtis noted with a small lot, there tends to be more impact to the neighbors, and the margin of error, such
as an encroachment, would have a bigger impact.
Printup stated in his view the Council should have that conversation. Printup stated someone approached
him the other day about what it would take to construct a 10’ x 10’ patio and that he did not have the
answer.
Council Member Walsh stated in his view this ordinance is a good place to start. Walsh stated the
Council should also know how many properties in Orono are less than two acres. As it relates to the
existing as-built survey, Walsh stated he would like to add language to the effect of, “or a plat that shows
the improvements that are on the property” since that would give the City pretty much the same thing.
Walsh stated he would also like to get rid of No. 4 and simply say, if it meets all these other items, which
would eliminate the acreage issue.
Walsh stated he also is not sure if 200 square feet is the right number and that he does not know how that
number was arrived at. Walsh stated he would like to look at a higher number to give some flexibility for
the smaller projects.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 8 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 25
5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY
REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE
NO. 146 (continued)
McMillan stated in her view this is a good start and that the Council can discuss lots smaller than two
acres as a second step. McMillan stated she would like to go ahead with this ordinance and then have a
separate discussion for the smaller lots. McMillan noted the City has tended to use two-acre lots as a
threshold in the past.
Printup indicated he is okay with that.
McMillan stated she would like to get this on the books to benefit the citizens.
Walsh stated all this is doing is benefitting the properties over two acres and that the Council is not doing
anything for lots smaller than two acres. Walsh stated this is the time for that conversation.
McMillan stated the Council discussed having a separate conversation for lots under two acres and that
they could have that discussion in a couple of months.
Walsh stated he thought that was what this conversation was going to be about.
McMillan noted the smaller lots would have a greater impact.
Walsh stated if it still fits the same issues, there should not be any problems.
Levang noted the majority of the properties fall within the two acres and that the City needs to cover its
bases. Levang indicated she is very comfortable with what the ordinance says. Since the smaller lots
will have a bigger impact, the City needs to be mindful of the impact to the neighbors. Levang indicated
she is in agreement with Mayor McMillan and that the Council should adopt this ordinance to benefit the
residents.
Walsh asked if at the next meeting the Council will start actively talking about the lots less than two
acres. Walsh stated it was his understanding the whole premise of this discussion was not to do
something for everybody with two acres and plus but rather to help the smaller houses and the smaller
lots. Walsh stated this ordinance would impact them the most.
Levang stated that is not necessarily true. Levang stated she has eight and a half acres but she might
want to construct a very small patio.
Walsh stated the percentage of that on her property is a very different number.
Levang noted the Council gave direction to Staff to come back with standards that the Council could live
with. Levang stated the Council should take a vote on the ordinance and see how they feel about it.
Walsh stated it was his understanding the Council was trying to solve it for all property owners and not
just a certain percentage of property owners.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 9 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 25
5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY
REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE
NO. 146 (continued)
McMillan stated this is what Staff feels comfortable with on the bigger lots. McMillan stated a smaller
lot may have a big impact to their neighbors and a small lakeshore lot may have a big impact with
hardcover. McMillan stated the ordinance was drafted based on Staff’s experience in administering these
site plans and survey requirements, and from that point of view, it is well thought out.
Walsh stated he is not looking for Staff’s thoughts and that he is looking for Staff to administer what the
Council directs them to do.
McMillan stated the Council asked Staff to see if they can figure out ways that the requirements for small
projects can be loosened up. McMillan stated Staff’s recommendation was for lots that are two acres or
greater.
Walsh asked how many properties in Orono are two acres or less. Walsh stated he would like to know
how many residents are being excluded.
Gaffron stated he does not have that answer tonight but that Staff can determine that number.
McMillan noted Staff administers these regulations and that they feel more comfortable with the bigger
lots since there will be less impact. McMillan stated Staff has a concern with loosening the standards on
smaller lots given the potential for those lots to have a greater impact. McMillan stated the Council can
discuss the impacts on the smaller lots later and that this is what is being presented tonight.
Walsh stated in his view that is not what the Council asked for. Walsh stated he also is not worried about
what Staff likes or does not like but that he is looking to solve the problem for the smaller lots.
McMillan stated the Council will not be able to solve this tonight and that she would like to move forward
with this ordinance.
Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 146 , Third Series, an Ordinance
Amending and Adding New Language to Chapter 86, Sections 86-66 and 86-68, Orono City Code
Regarding Landscape Permits and Survey Requirements.
Printup stated he is okay with approving this but that he would encourage the Council to discuss the
smaller lots in the near future. Printup stated the potential impact to the neighbor needs to be considered,
and that in his mind a small project is a 10’ x 10’ patio. Printup stated to other people that might be a big
deck and that it is subjective to each person and each lot. Printup stated that is a conversation he would
like to have.
McMillan suggested he include that on his list of goals that the Council will be discussing in a couple of
weeks.
Council Member Cornick stated he is comfortable with going ahead with the two acres but that in his
view the impacts on smaller lots needs to be studied further.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 10 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 25
5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY
REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE
NO. 146 (continued)
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Walsh Opposed.
6. #15-3722 STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE
Senior Planner Gaffron stated at the April 27 meeting the Council provided some direction on this draft
ordinance regarding stormwater and drainage trunk fee. Staff did make the following changes pursuant to
that discussion:
1. Establishing a fee credit in the 2-acre and 5-acre zones for:
Acreage of newly-created wetland.
Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional treatment
benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the development site.
Acreage of conservation easements resulting from Conservation Design process in both the
2-acre and 5-acre zones.
2. The perimeter buffer credit for the 5-acre zone is removed.
3. The conversion to a per-lot fee basis for the 1/2 acre, 1-acre, 2-acre and 5-acre zones caps the fee
at the zoning lot size dry-buildable minimum area. As a result, existing wetlands will no longer
be included in the chargeable area and therefore no fee credit is given for the existing wetlands.
It should be noted that because the multi-family and high-density residential fees remain on a gross per-
acre basis, the following credits would still be allowed:
All wetland acreage up to the delineation line.
Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional
treatment benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the
development site.
Acreage of conservation easements resulting from the Conservation Design process.
Gaffron stated the draft ordinance section for revising the Fee Schedule has been removed from the Fee
Ordinance and is attached as a separate Fee Schedule Ordinance for adoption.
Gaffron noted there is one correction on Exhibit A, the bottom of Page 3 under Item 7, relating to the
three characteristics for reduction. Gaffron stated those items should be underlined as well since it is new
language in the Code. The Council should review the draft and direct Staff as to any additional changes
desired.
Printup stated as it concerns redevelopment projects, he would be comfortable removing that and keeping
this ordinance specific to new development.
Levang indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Printup and that she is not prepared to
address redevelopment at this time but that it could be a later discussion.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 11 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 25
6. #15-3722 STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE (continued)
Gaffron noted the language that is not underlined is existing language and that there might be some other
places where that will need to be removed.
McMillan stated it would need to be removed from the City’s fee schedule.
Levang stated in her view the City Council needs to discuss that further.
Gaffron stated it has been in the Code for a dozen years but has not been implemented.
McMillan noted it has been in there since 2002.
Walsh and Cornick indicated they are in agreement with Council Member Printup.
McMillan asked if Staff would like the Council to make a motion approving the ordinance with the
language relating to redevelopment being removed.
Gaffron stated it would be helpful if the Council would allow Staff to review it further to ensure that there
are other sections that need to be removed and that Staff could bring it back in two weeks.
Gaffron stated under this ordinance, as it relates to Lakeview, their original fee was determined to be
$550,000 on 145 acres excluding the county road rights-of-way. If the fee is calculated on a per lot basis,
it would amount to $353,000. Gaffron noted while Lakeview is not getting a reduction for excess
stormwater capacity or newly created wetlands, there would be a reduction for the conservation easement,
which is approximately 45 percent of the property area, and would reduce their fee to $195,000. Gaffron
stated that is an example of what the ordinance will do as drafted.
Levang moved, Printup seconded, to table Application No. 15-3722, Stormwater and Drainage
Trunk Fee. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*7. #15-3727 JOHN BROOKS, 905 AND 960 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, SUBDIVISION
FOR A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT – RESOLUTION NO.6499
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6499, a Resolution Approving a
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement at 905-960 Ferndale Road West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*8. #15-3728 W. LANDSCAPES, INC., O/B/O KEVIN AND T ERESA TORGERSON, 1410
CHERRY PLACE – RESOLUTION NO. 6500
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6500, a Resolution Granting
Variances from Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 and 78-1680, for the property located at
1410 Cherry Place. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 12 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 25
9. #15-3729 SPRING HILL GOLF COURSE, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – RESOLUTION NO. 6501
Curtis stated the Spring Hill Golf Club has requested approval of a conditional use permit to construct a
winter practice and training building approximately 55 feet from Sixth Avenue North accessed off of the
golf club entry road. Spring Hill Golf Club exists within the RR-B district and operates under a
conditional use permit. All accessory buildings must be located at least 50 feet from adjacent properties
zoned for residential use.
At its April meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application,
including the evidence submitted. Following the public hearing, the Commission voted 5 to 0 to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit to allow construction of the proposed winter training
building with the following conditions:
1. The locations for the stormwater ponding area and the proposed septic tank locations shall be
coordinated prior to placement on the City Council agenda for approval. The applicant has
provided a revised plan and it is included in the Council packet as Exhibit B.
2. A re-vegetation plan screening the new building from Sixth Avenue shall be submitted prior to
placement on the City Council agenda for approval. The applicant has provided a landscape plan
and it is attached as Exhibit C.
3. The applicant shall maintain the septic system under a contract with a licensed pumper and
annual pumping reports shall be submitted to the City.
4. All necessary permits by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District shall be obtained.
5. All exterior lighting shall be held to Dark Sky lighting standards.
6. All necessary City construction permits must be obtained prior to commencement of construction.
Staff recommends approval with the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. An
approval resolution has been drafted for Council consideration.
Levang noted the applicant is asking to construct a winter practice and training building. Levang asked
whether that will be used year-round.
Tim Johnson, Spring Hill Golf Course, stated the building will house teaching equipment in the
summertime and there might be a lesson held in one of the bays on a rainy day. Johnson indicated the
building will basically have three bays that house all the new electronic teaching aids. The majority of
the time that equipment will be pulled out on the tee and the rest of the building will be shut down during
the summertime.
McMillan asked if the bay doors are just for accessibility.
Johnson indicated in the wintertime those bays will be heated stalls and the teaching equipment will be
located in there. Johnson stated they will hit to the outside from those teaching bays.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 13 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 25
9. #15-3729 SPRING HILL GOLF COURSE, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – RESOLUTION NO. 6501 (continued)
Walsh noted Exhibit C is a screening plan and that the Planning Commission had raised some concerns
about screening the building. Walsh requested Staff walk through the screening plan.
Curtis displayed the screening plan on the overhead.
Johnson stated they plan to save as much of the existing vegetation in the ditch as possible. The
vegetation around the rain garden/holding pond will be removed but the vegetation will be replaced to
create a solid wall similar to what currently exists.
Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6501, a Resolution Granting a
Conditional Use Permit for a Winter Training Facility Building Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code
Section 78-418, for the property located at 725 Sixth Avenue North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*10. CITY OF ORONO JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES – RESOLUTION NOS. 6502, 6503,
6504, 6505, 6506, 6507, 6508, 6509, 6510, and 6511
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6502, 6503, 6504, 6505, 6506, 6507,
6508, 6509, 6510, and 6511, Resolutions Establishing Policy Regarding Certificate of Survey
Requirements for Joint Use Dock Licenses. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
11. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POPULATION AND HOUSING PROJECTION
RESPONSE LETTER
Gaffron stated at the April 27 work session, the Council reviewed the Metropolitan Council’s recent
forecasts for population, housing and employment, as well as the amendments to the 2040 Housing Policy
Plan. Council direction was to draft a letter to the Metropolitan Council reflecting the City Council’s
discussion.
The Housing Policy Plan indicates that of approximately 350 new households forecasted to be created in
Orono during 2021-2030, the City’s allocated share of affordable housing need for that period is 153
units, or just over 40 percent of the total growth. Gaffron stated described in the letter are some of the
reasons for why it would be difficult to meet those ranges entirely.
In addition, the Housing Plan suggests that Orono should plan to provide for as many as 66 new homes at
a price point of $74,000 in order to accommodate households with incomes of $24,700. Gaffron noted
that is a big percentage of Orono’s total housing and that it may be difficult to achieve that goal.
McMillan stated the sentence in the last full paragraph states: “However, we are encouraged that the
options for local implementation of the Plan include guiding sufficient land at high enough densities to
meet the allocated need.” McMillan stated in her view that is a little confusing. McMillan asked if Staff
felt there was enough land for high density in all ranges.
Gaffron stated in the current Comprehensive Plan, the City guided some properties for 10 to 15 units per
acre and some for seven to ten units per acre. The City has not done an analysis to be able to show the
Metropolitan Council that Orono has already that. Gaffron stated the Metropolitan Council has not asked
Orono whether they have already done that and that he is not sure he wants to go down that path.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 14 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13 of 25
11. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POPULATION AND HOUSING PROJECTION
RESPONSE LETTER (continued)
Gaffron stated the letter can certainly let the Metropolitan Council know that the City can meet their
responsibility and their goals by guiding sufficient property for potential high-density if that kind of
development should occur.
McMillan asked if Staff would be opposed to removing that sentence.
Gaffron indicated that would be fine.
Levang asked if the Metropolitan Council is simply providing some numbers and not asking how many
will be townhomes and how many will be apartment buildings.
Gaffron stated this is an amendment to their housing plan. Gaffron stated once it is in the Metropolitan
Council’s plan, they will generate a system statement for housing that comes out as one of the City’s
guidelines for doing the next Comprehensive Plan update. Once the Metropolitan Council provides that
to the City, it might provide clearer direction.
McMillan stated in her view it is good to go on record stating the City’s concerns.
Walsh stated it is good to state the obvious to stay consistent with what the City is doing.
Printup noted over the last 30 years, the City did not come close to gaining what the Metropolitan Council
projected. Printup stated it is difficult to argue with these absurd numbers.
Gaffron stated this is not the right forum for raising that point and that there will be opportunities every
ten years to argue that. Gaffron stated including it in this letter will probably not result in any progress on
that point but that the City will raise it at the appropriate times.
Gaffron noted the Metropolitan Council is responsible for seven counties with different perspectives and
different goals. The Metropolitan Council has to provide something that meets the standard for every city
and it is likely that there are cities at one end of the scale and there are cities at the other end of the scale
in terms of goals, policies, and future plans.
Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to approve the response letter to the Metropolitan Council with
the removal of the sentence referenced by Mayor McMillan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT
12. WATERTOWN ROAD AND STUBBS BAY ROAD REHABILITATION AWARD
Edwards noted the City has been working on this project since last May when Bolton & Menk presented a
feasibility study for the rehabilitation of Watertown Road and Stubbs Bay Road. At the October 27
meeting, the City Council approved engineering services for survey, design and bidding of reconstruction
by reclamation of Stubbs Bay Road from Watertown Road to Bayside Road and Watertown Road from
Stubbs Bay Road to Old Crystal Bay Road. In March of 2015, the Council approved the plans and
authorized the City to obtain bids.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 15 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14 of 25
12. WATERTOWN ROAD AND STUBBS BAY ROAD REHABILITATION AWARD
(continued)
The City received four bids. The low bidder was Bituminous Roadways with a bid of $684,481.30.
Edwards noted this bid was lower than the next lowest bid by a couple hundred thousand dollars and
$300,000 below the engineering estimate, which is very good news.
Edwards stated the Council will need to decide whether to proceed forward with the project, the funding
for the project, and whether to authorize Bolton & Menk to provide construction oversight at a not to
exceed cost of $69,100.
The Watertown Road portion of the project may be funded with municipal state aid funds. Stubbs Bay
Road is not eligible for MSA funds. Resources could be allocated from other funds, such as the 2014
General Fund Balance or borrowed from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. If the City did
spend the money on Stubbs Bay Road, they will still have a significant amount remaining in order to do
the improvements on Baldur Park Road.
Edwards stated construction will begin in June with completion expected by the end of the summer.
Levang asked what the City’s experience is with Bituminous Roadways.
Consulting Engineer Martini stated he is not aware if they have done work in Orono before but that they
are a contractor that does this type of work on a regular basis. Martini indicated he has no concerns about
their ability to do the job.
Walsh stated Bituminous Roadways is a pretty big operation. Walsh asked how the City can get better on
estimating of projects. Walsh stated he would also like to get some input on how the process worked with
Blue Book.
Martini stated the City started this process last year, and that when they were putting the feasibility study
together, they looked at similar projects to see what was going on with the bidding climate. Martini
stated what was happening last summer was the construction industry became more and more competitive
and contractors were very busy. In addition, blacktop prices were very high last year.
Martini noted he came to the Council once or twice with a revised estimate where it was increased.
Martini stated the bulk of the project consists of bituminous and removal and that they attempted to figure
out what was an appropriate estimate for the blacktop prices for 2015. Since that time the price of
bituminous has decreased.
Martini indicated the other thing that was in play from the feasibility study was the amount of stormwater
work that would be done. As the blacktop prices were coming down, they were also adding some more
stormwater work into the project than what was originally included.
Martini stated when these projects get stretched out over time; the costs get to be more of a moving target.
In looking at the bids received, it seems the $800,000 range was what most of the contractors felt was the
value of the job and that Bituminous Roadways might really want the project or may have found some
efficiencies to give the City a very competitive price. Martini stated it is their goal to keep the estimates
as close as possible since that is the tool the City needs to be able to plan for projects like this.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 16 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15 of 25
12. WATERTOWN ROAD AND STUBBS BAY ROAD REHABILITATION AWARD
(continued)
Walsh asked how the Blue Book process was.
Martini stated they basically provided the City’s ad for bids for advertisement on the Blue Book site.
Martini indicated he did have some communication with them so they could better understand the trades
so they could be reaching out to their appropriate contacts. Martini stated in looking at the four bids
received, he is not sure whether it would have made any difference, but that it is a simple enough process
that they can continue to provide them with ads.
Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to award the contract to Bituminous Roadways in the amount of
$686,481.30; approve the construction phase services to Bolton & Menk in the not-to-exceed
amount of $69,100; and to fund the project as outlined in Table 4 of Staff’s memorandum. VOTE:
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*13. KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to authorize Bolton & Menk to manage the design and
construction of a new 18” culvert at Carmen Bay Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*14. WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS – PAY REQUEST NO. 2
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve Pay Request No. 2 to Municipal Builders, Inc., in the
amount of $395,491.52 for the Water Treatment Systems Improvement Project. VOTE: Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
15. LIVINGSTON (TOWER) PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST
Edwards stated one of the items approved at last week’s Park Commission meeting was a site plan/design
for Livingston Park at a cost of $850.00
Edwards stated the 2015 park budget is allocated toward maintenance items and that since this is a
development based request, he felt uncomfortable approving it at his level. Edwards stated the question
becomes, if the Council is in favor of the site plan/design, whether they be amenable in the future to
outlaying more dollars for development and improvement of this park. Edwards stated if the Council is
not in favor of making the recommended improvements, it may not make sense to go ahead with the
design.
Edwards stated there is room within the current budget that it could absorb the $850, but that based on a
very rough estimate of what some of these improvements will cost, they could be talking between
$15,000 to $20,000 to improve the park.
Edwards stated the sketch of the overhead is his very rough sketch of what the Park Commission has
indicated they would like the park to look like. Edwards indicated Livingston Park is the piece of ground
immediately to the north of the water tower in Navarre. The park currently has three park benches, some
grass and some trees. The Park Commission has discussed adding a paved walkway with a reflecting
garden in the middle with benches facing it, a pergola over the top of the picnic table that would sit on top
of a paved pad.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 17 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16 of 25
15. LIVINGSTON (TOWER) PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST (continued)
Other amenities on the site include a port-a-potty, a screen, bike racks, and a water fountain that would be
connected into the City’s water supply. In addition, the Park Commission would like to add some fencing
around a couple of the items, such as the generator and an equipment bank that sits outside the footprint
of the sketch and a desire to do some native grass screenings along the fence.
Edwards stated those screening improvements may or may not be problematic based on the Homeland
Security requirements. Edwards noted he did not depict the plantings and gardens but that those were
also part of the vision of the Park Commission.
Edwards displayed a picture of what Livingston Park looks like currently.
Levang noted she has been working with the Park Commission and that she is in favor of the project.
Levang stated there are a number of reasons to raise the profile of Livingston Park, and include the fact
that this is a very natural way to the Dakota Rail Trail, connects to the opposite side of County Road 15 in
a safe way where pedestrians can seek respite and then continue down County Road 15 to the business
district.
Levang indicated the Park Commission is talking about a phased approach over time and that a possible
partnership with Three Rivers is being explored. Three Rivers has stated that high priorities for the
Dakota Trail are bathrooms and water. Levang stated the Council needs to remember that this is a high-
density area and that it would serve a great number of people as well as those on the Dakota Rail Trail.
Levang stated the City also needs a nexus to the City parks. Levang noted there are a number of new
homes on Northern Avenue and that this would create a nexus for them.
Printup stated he would like to learn more about the phase approach. Printup asked whether the Park
Commission is contemplating that the benches or bike racks will be donated.
Levang indicated this is just a rough plan and that the three benches that are currently there do not look at
anything and are situated at very odd angles. In addition, the residents are looking into the water plant,
which is not a desirable view, and some evergreens on the other side. Levang stated this park is not
getting the use it could if it was improved some and that a phased approach could be suggested by
Norling’s with the input of the Park Commission.
Levang noted the telecom equipment is off to the right and out in the open, which presents a certain kind
of danger since someone can easily access the panel. Levang stated in her view that needs to be
addressed.
Printup stated he is okay approving the $850 for a plan, but questioned whether that would commit the
City to $20,000 in improvements.
Levang stated it does not commit the City, and that if Norling is the contractor awarded the bid, that
amount would go towards the project. Levang stated the Park Commission does not know the exact cost
of the improvements at this point but that they need a plan if they want to move forward.
Printup stated when the City discussed this site approximately four years ago, there were some neighbors
who were interested in helping place some plantings around the fence area or do some type of screening.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 18 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17 of 25
15. LIVINGSTON (TOWER) PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST (continued)
Printup indicated he would be in favor of the City encouraging the neighbors to perhaps do some
plantings but that he has a concern with spending $20,000 on some improvements.
Levang pointed out the cost is not $20,000 and that it is a guestimate at this point. Levang stated the issue
is screening and whether Homeland Security would allow it, which is something that needs to be
investigated as to what actually can go in there since there has to be an ability to see in there. Levang
noted a number of hostas were planted at Navarre Park by the neighbors, which cost the City nothing
except for the wood chips. Levang stated in that situation everything was done by volunteers and that she
can see that happening again here.
McMillan stated the question is whether the design creates certain expectations. McMillan stated she
understands they do not have to do everything included in the design. McMillan noted the City got hung
up a couple of years ago with the Homeland Security issue on the fencing.
McMillan stated she does not know who did the original design with the benches, but that the park has
been cleaned up and that it would be nice to get some improvements in this park. McMillan stated her
question is in relation to the other parks and other play equipment and how this is prioritized against the
other parks. McMillan asked whether the City has playground equipment that needs to be replaced in the
near future.
Edwards stated the Park Commission has developed a priority list this year and that they would like to
target Summit Beach, French Creek, Lydiard Beach, and this park this year. The other three parks that
the Park Commission would like to focus on this year fall well within the maintenance realm. In the case
of Livingston Park, other than mowing, the Park Commission is out of maintenance things to do and the
question is whether it should be developed.
Walsh stated his question related to the priority of this park versus the other parks and that he would like
to see some more information on that. Walsh indicated he is in favor of making Orono’s parks better,
which is the reason why the Park Commission was re-established. Walsh asked if the improvements can
come out of the park dedication fee fund.
Edwards stated one possibility is the Park Fund and the other possibility is upping the Park Commission’s
regular budget for next year.
McMillan stated the benches would be an improvement and could come out of the Park Fund. McMillan
noted a port-a-potty would be a monthly expense.
Walsh stated he would like to better understand where the money would come from. Walsh asked how
much the Park Fund has in it.
McMillan stated the Park Fund has approximately $600,000 in it and that the City Council allocated
$10,000 for maintenance at the parks.
Walsh stated regardless of what the improvements cost, he would like to sort out the funding a little bit
better so the projects can be prioritized. Walsh stated he would like to do the improvements but that they
need to figure out what is coming out of the general fund and what is not coming out of the general fund.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 19 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18 of 25
15. LIVINGSTON (TOWER) PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST (continued)
McMillan noted this item relates just to the $850 for the plan and that she is not sure whether anything
would get started this year.
Edwards indicated he is not prepared to discuss the funding of the improvements at this point and that if
there is a design, the contractor could perhaps itemize those improvements. Edwards stated it might be
possible for some of the work to be performed by volunteers or for the City to ask for donations.
Edwards indicated some of the work could also be performed by the Public Works Department and the
rest could be contracted out.
McMillan asked if there is a reason why Norling’s was picked to do the design.
Edwards stated the City currently has a relationship with them to perform different landscaping in the
City.
Cornick asked if the City Engineer can see a scenario where something might go wrong with the well and
the City will need to drill a new well.
Edwards stated there are currently two wells on the site and that it is possible in the future the wells might
fail. Edwards stated occasionally the Public Works Department needs access to the water treatment plant
and that the design will need to accommodate that.
Walsh stated he would like to see a presentation by the Parks Commission on their priorities.
Levang noted there is a plan for a joint Park Commission/City Council meeting in the future.
Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve the allocation of $850 for a design for Livingston
Park, with the funds coming out of the Parks budget.
Printup stated between Highway 12 and County Road 6, there is a big power plant near the Luce Line,
and on one side of that plant there is a wooden structure or wall for screening purposes. Printup stated he
would again advocate for some sort of screening around the chain link on the sides where there are
homes.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER REPORT, CONTINUED
Edwards reported pothole repair has been ongoing and that hydrant flushing has begun.
Edwards stated the Public Works Department has replaced the speed bumps on Crystal Bay Road, which
has become somewhat contentious with the residents. Edwards stated the crew did not put wood under
them again since he is not how they are designed and that the City could assume liability if they install
Them differently from what the manufacturer recommends. The residents have expressed a desire to have
higher speed bumps. Edwards indicated he is working with the police department on a traffic study to see
what the speeds on the road are. Edwards stated the City could perhaps look at a different speed bump if
the speeds are determined to be high.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 20 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19 of 25
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER REPORT,(continued)
In addition, the Public Works Department has been conducting valve replacements on the City sewer and
systems.
Edwards stated the Crystal Bay Post Office is becoming a maintenance nightmare and that the Public
Works Department has been busy fixing floors, ceilings, and so on.
Edwards noted the Orono Golf Course has been open for a month and that they are a little bit down on the
number of memberships sold this year. Approximately 13,000 rounds of golf were played as of one week
ago. Edwards indicated he is not able to compare that to last year since the golf course was not open at
this time.
There were also two new women leagues started this year and three area schools are using the golf course.
Edwards stated they have also done some excavation for the new practice putting green up by the
clubhouse and that they will be bringing some special golf soils in and some plugs to get it to grow for
next year. Three catch basins were also installed.
McMillan thanked Staff for working on the golf course and making that a high priority. McMillan noted
that the Public Works Director has been working with the City Administrator on Town Line Road in
response to a citizen letter received two weeks ago.
Edwards stated he did review Town Line Road and it is in poor condition. Certain sections of the road
are beyond pothole repair and that he will be obtaining some quotes to replace a 100-foot section and a
30-foot section. Edwards indicated that work is beyond what the Public Works Department can do in-
house and that he is hoping the patches will hold the road over until the City is ready to rehabilitate the
entire road. Edwards stated the Public Works Department can do the removal and demolition but they are
not able to lay that clean piece of asphalt.
Walsh asked how the bidders are being chosen.
Edwards stated he has approached the local contractors that perform asphalt work in the area.
Walsh indicated he would like to be involved in that process.
Cornick asked if half of that road is in Maple Plain.
Edwards indicated it is on the border with Independence, and as it goes north, it is between Independence
and Medina. Edwards stated he will be in touch with Independence to see if they would be willing to
contribute to this project. Edwards stated the last formal agreement with Independence that he could find
for Town Line Road was dated 1979.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Walsh stated he did visit with a couple of homeowners on Town Line Road and that in his view it is not a
complicated project.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 21 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20 of 25
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued)
Walsh indicated he also talked to some of the Crystal Bay Road residents and that he knows there are
some issues with the bump height and the number of bumps. Walsh stated Crystal Bay Road is a pretty
active drive-through for people going to the Lafayette Club or people cutting over to County Road 15.
Walsh stated there is also an issue with the speed signs since they are 15 miles an hour and the speed
bumps are designed for 20 miles. Walsh noted the Public Works Director has indicated there is nothing
that shows there should be a 15 mile-per-hour speed limit on that road.
Edwards stated he was talking about a couple of local traffic only signs that are not in the City’s database
showing the City authorized those signs. Edwards stated it is a public road and that he is not sure how he
can maintain those signs limiting it to local traffic only. Edwards stated the speed bumps have a range of
15 to 20 miles an hour.
Walsh stated the residents would like additional speed humps installed if possible and that he will direct
the residents to contact the Public Works Director if they are interested in certain locations for adding
speed bumps.
Cornick stated over the past week he has received approximately half a dozen calls from residents. All
seven phone calls were in favor of the City passing the wellhead ordinance and that he has received no
negative feedback. Cornick stated those were the first seven phone calls he has received since being on
the Council and that in his view they were generated by the flyer that came out.
Cornick noted he also attended the Navarre Initiative meeting and that they are still moving forward with
their ideas. Cornick stated it is an excellent committee.
Levang stated she would like to read a public statement that she has developed regarding the flyer and
that she would like to be very specific about what she sees happening in Orono.
Levang read the following: “I find the flyer sent to citizens of Orono, and surrounding communities, to
be disrespectful. As an elected official, I accept that my vote will be scrutinized and even challenged.
This publication went far beyond the bounds of decency and, instead, discredited citizens, staff,
volunteers, and neighbors with its criticism. Our citizens and neighbors did not deserve to be treated so
irresponsibly and carelessly with sensationalized headlines and stories seeped in falsehoods.
I want to address the issues raised about transparency and the allegation that I voted against videotaping
the Planning Commission out of an unwillingness to be transparent. Nothing could be further from the
truth. I voted against this proposal because of essential differences in the roles of the Planning
Commission and City Council.
Planning Commissioners are unpaid volunteers. They are appointed by the City Council and serve as
advisors to us. The votes they make are advisory only. Every application they process comes to the City
Council for continued study and, ultimately, for a final vote. On the other hand, City Council members
are elected officials. We run for office and are elected based on citizen votes. We are paid. Every
application we process comes to us with a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Sometimes
those recommendations are upheld, at other times they are not. I also take offense at the ungrateful
attitude this flyer showed to our Planning Commissioners who work tirelessly as volunteers for the City.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 22 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 25
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued)
To accuse Mayor McMillan and I of lack of transparency flies in the face of the facts. The two of us are
responsible for securing funding for our new camera equipment and software to better tape, live stream,
and archive our meetings. In doing so, we now have live streaming of our City Council meetings,
something few cities have, and our on-demand viewing is significantly faster and more effective.
We are also responsible for the creation of a Communications Committee and the publication of three
newsletters per year. New content has been added to our website because of our efforts, and I worked to
institute an anonymous on-line complaint form for residents.
Where is the transparency of this person or group who put out this flyer? If transparency was so
important, why did they not walk the talk?”
McMillan stated she also received some citizen calls regarding the wellhead article that was in the flyer.
The calls did not come from citizens who had private wells and were not located in the City water district,
nor will they likely ever be given their location. McMillan indicated she reassured them that if their well
was not functioning, that they would be able to drill a new well and that the ordinance would not affect
them.
McMillan stated she is deeply concerned that Orono citizens were unjustly scared by a poorly written
flyer that was designed to fear monger rather than explain the details of the wellhead ordinance.
McMillan stated Staff was kind to quickly respond by displaying on the website the clarification of the
well situation so that citizens would not be confused. McMillan stated she did have some citizens who
were really upset and called immediately. McMillan stated they took time out of their day to raise their
concerns and she took time out of her day to explain to them clearly the situation because of a concern
about the residents receiving misinformation.
McMillan noted she also received three calls in support of the Council decision on the wellhead
protection ordinance and one call was from a plumber located in Long Lake who felt the City was doing
the right thing in protecting Orono’s municipal well water.
McMillan stated as it relates to the other misconceptions regarding the deck permit, she does not want to
go into that tonight. McMillan stated those comments were in addition to the negative casting of an area
retailer talking about building in Orono. McMillan stated in her view the flyer was not productive to the
community and was written to intimidate and bully Orono’s citizens and Staff with demeaning speech and
misconceptions. McMillan stated it was very unfortunate to have that happen two weeks ago and that she
hopes the citizens will be able to get clarification on some of the facts of the flyer.
McMillan stated on a more positive note, she had a wonderful evening at Navarre Night. There were
approximately 85 people in attendance at the Freshwater Institute to hear stories about Navarre and two
Casco Point citizens. McMillan stated the new banner was also on display and people indicated they
liked it. McMillan stated Joan Wolfe did an excellent job along with the Historical Society and that she is
hopeful there is another similar event.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 23 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 25
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
16. APPOINTMENTS – RESOLUTION NO. 6512
Loftus stated last month the City received a request for appointment of fence viewers, which they
indicated is spelled out in state statute. Loftus stated she did have a chance to talk about that with the City
Attorney regarding the issue who might have more to add.
Loftus noted the City has not previously appointed fence viewers as part of the City’s annual
appointments. Loftus stated if the City is interested in adding fence viewers, they will need to amend the
resolution approved in January. Loftus recommended Jim Cornick and Lizz Levang be appointed as
fence viewers.
Mattick stated the reason this was not an annual appointment by the Orono City Council is that the state
statute is really written for a rural setting addressing separation of fields and barbed wire fences. The
statute is not really talking about privacy fences and really only pertains to partition fences. Mattick
stated when the statute talks about what constitutes a partition fence; it talks about a barbed wire fence.
Mattick stated to his knowledge Orono does not allow barbed wire fences.
Gaffron stated he is not sure the City has a prohibition on barbed wire fences.
Mattick stated the statute does require fence viewers but does not state how many. Staff is suggesting two
individuals be appointed. Mattick stated in his view the statute is clumsily written and needs to be
updated since it references terms that are outdated. Mattick stated in his view the statute is not meant for
subdivisions but that the City could go ahead and appoint two people to act as fence viewers.
Cornick asked if they have to work as a team or whether they can each do fence viewing on their own.
Mattick suggested they work together as a team. Mattick noted there are some notice requirements and
some determinations that need to be made on whether or not it qualifies as a partition fence.
Walsh asked if the neighbors are also alerted.
Mattick stated it would be the neighbor on the other side of the fence.
Cornick asked if it would be wise to have a special vest or identification.
Mattick stated as long as folks are notified they will be coming and a definite time is scheduled; he does
not feel identification is necessary beyond that.
Loftus stated the City does have some vests they could wear.
Levang indicated she would prefer that.
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to amend RESOLUTION NO. 6512, a Resolution Designating
Selected Appointments for the Year 2015, adding fence viewer. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 24 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 25
17. DONATION TO WETONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
McMillan stated this item is very straight forward and asked if anyone on the Council had a question
regarding it.
Printup stated he is okay with the donation but that he would like to make the statement that where local
government reaches out into areas where they do not have responsibility for, he would caution against
that. Printup noted in the past six or seven months ago the City partnered with Pioneer Museum in
Long Lake and a donation was also made to them.
Printup moved, Cornick seconded, to approve a $250 donation to the Westonka Historical Society
for co-hosting Navarre Night with the City of Orono. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
18. BUILDING OFFICIAL
Loftus stated the City has completed its recruitment for a new Building Official and that Staff would
recommend that Roger Peitso be hired for the position. Loftus indicated Roger Peitso is currently
employed with Metro West Inspections and has 15 years of experience working in Medina and Long
Lake. Loftus stated Staff is excited to have someone with his background on board. Loftus noted he is
also a Certified Septic Inspector, which will be helpful for the City.
Loftus stated based on his current pay, he would be brought in at Step 3 of 8, and he would be available to
start May 26.
Walsh asked who the City currently uses for their outsourced inspections.
Loftus indicated Metro West does them but that Roger does not service Orono currently.
Levang moved, Printup seconded, to appoint Roger Peitso to the position of building official.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT, CONTINUED
Loftus stated Kraus-Anderson will be back in Orono to complete the punch lists items and that they hope
to have them completed by the beginning of June. Loftus indicated the project is on track budget-wise
and timeline-wise.
Loftus noted she and Council Member Walsh attended a fire department advisory board meeting recently
and that it was reported the fire department came in right on budget for 2014.
Loftus noted the next City Council meeting is not going to be on Monday but on Tuesday, May 26, since
the City is not allowed to conduct official business on a federal holiday.
*19. LICENSES AND PERMITS
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 25 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 25
Garbage and Refuse Collector Licenses
1. Baldy Sanitation, Inc.
5906 Henry Street
Maple Plain, MN 55359
2. Vintage Waste Systems, Inc.
520 Tamarack Avenue
Long Lake, MN 55356
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve the above-listed licenses. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*20. CLAIMS/BILLS
Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
Mattick stated occasionally the City of Orono will receive what is called an application to register land,
which is where a landowner would like to clear up their title and get it registered. In oftentimes the City,
especially in the lakeshore setting, may have access or easements, and they will be named in those types
of suits. Mattick stated it averages between four to six a year and usually they are pretty routine and
straight forward where the City merely contacts the party and lets them know whether the City would like
to keep their easement or not.
Mattick stated the City did receive one just recently regarding some property that involves one of the
North Shore Marina’s access to Lake Minnetonka that is currently used by one of the fire station’s boats
to dock there. During the winter the access serves as a snowmobile access to the lake.
Mattick stated at this point the City is aware that there is somewhat of a dispute on how that access can be
used and the exact location of the access. Mattick indicated Staff is still in the preliminary aspects of
looking into this but that he would consider this not to be one of the City’s typical land title applications.
Mattick stated in his opinion one of the things that is driving this is the fact that it is used by the
snowmobilers, which bubbles the water and causes ice issues.
Mattick stated Staff can start going ahead and sorting out the real estate issues, but that it would make
some sense to have either one or two people from the Council volunteer to meet with the property owners
and to keep the City Council up-to-date on the situation. Mattick indicated he does plan on reaching out
to the other attorney to arrange for a meeting and that at least one Staff member will also be attending in
addition to the City Council representative.
Walsh indicated he would not have any problem going to that meeting since he has a lot of experience in
land dealings.
McMillan stated she also would like to be there.
Printup stated it is important that not just snowmobilers use that.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 26 of 378]
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2015
7:00 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 25
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (continued)
Loftus stated it is a City access and is the closest access to Big Island.
Mattick stated it is an important access to the lake and would be governed under a covenant. Mattick
stated he will be in touch with Mayor McMillan and Council Member Walsh.
21. CLOSED MEETING FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to enter into closed session at 9:08 p.m. to discuss the City
Administrator’s performance. VOTE: Ayes 5 Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
The Orono City Council meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
____________________________________ ______________________________________
Diane Tiegs, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 27 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 28 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Jessica Loftus JML City Administrator's Report
Title City Administrator
Item Description: Building Official Lyle Oman Retirement & Recognition
Lyle Oman has announced that he will be retiring from his position as Building Official. His last
official day will be May 29, 2015. Lyle has provided more than 31 years of dedicated service to
the City. A resolution of appreciation is attached for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider a motion to accept Lyle Oman’s resignation and to adopt a resolution of appreciation
for Lyle’s more than 31 years of dedicated service to the City.
3
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 29 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 30 of 378]
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO
LYLE OMAN
FOR HIS THIRTY- ONE YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE
RESOLUTION NO. ______
WHEREAS, Lyle Oman was appointed to the Building Inspector position April
23, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Lyle Oman became the Chief Building Official for the City of Orono
on December 5, 1990, and has served in this capacity for the past 25 years; and
WHEREAS, Lyle Oman has overseen the day-to-day inspections in the City of
Orono and Minnetonka Beach; and
WHEREAS, Lyle Oman’s 31 years of service have been characterized by his
dedication to providing the highest quality service to the City and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, Lyle Oman in his role as Chief Building Official has worked
diligently toward ensuring the highest quality of construction standards to protect the
community’s residents, business owners and employees with regard to enforcement of
important life safety aspects of construction codes and practices; and
WHEREAS, Lyle is retiring from his position with the City and will always be
thought of fondly as a kind, considerate and loyal individual dedicated to both his position
and community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council, Staff
and residents wish to extend their utmost appreciation and officially commend Lyle Oman
for his leadership and service to the community as the Chief Building Official.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby extend to Lyle
its best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this
26th day of May, 2015.
ATTEST:
___________________________ _________________________
Diane Tiegs, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 31 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 32 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 33 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 34 of 378]
Date Application Received: 05/11/2015
Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/11/2015
60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/10/2015
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: 19 May 2015
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis mcc JML
Title: Planner
Item Description:
#08-3355 Clement and Winifred Kroll, 60 Stubbs Bay Road S
7th Preliminary Plat Approval Extension – Resolution
Zoning District: RR-1B (2 acres)
Property Area: 8.9 acres
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A. Draft Preliminary Plat Extension Resolution
Exhibit B. Resolution No. 5753 Granting Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit C. Resolution No. 5847 - 1st Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval (#09-3413)
Exhibit D. Resolution No. 5942 - 2nd Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit E. Resolution No. 6057 - 3rd Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit F. Resolution No. 6151 - 4th Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit G. Resolution No. 6304 – 5th Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit H. Resolution No. 6414 – 6th Renewal of Preliminary Plat Approval
Exhibit I. Application – Preliminary Plat Extension
Exhibit J. Survey of Preliminary Plat, dated 03/14/2008
Exhibit K. Aerial photo, Bolton & Menk/Hennepin County
Exhibit L. Aerial photo, Bing
Application Summary:
Preliminary plat approval was granted to Clement and Winifred Kroll in 2008 in order to divide their 8.9 acre
property into four 2± acre lots. Since that time the owners have requested and received six extensions of the
preliminary plat approval expiration. Once, in 2009 the application was renewed under a new application
number. To simplify, the application will continue to be reviewed under the original approval number (08-
3355); the 2009 application number will also be included for tracking purposes.
At this time the owners are requesting an additonal extension of the effective period of preliminary plat
approval for one additional year until July 14, 2016. In the past year there have been no changes to the
relevant zoning or subdivision regulations.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
The Council should adopt or amend the attached resolution.
5
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 35 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 36 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 37 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 38 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 39 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 40 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 41 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 42 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 43 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 44 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 45 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 46 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 47 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 48 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 49 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 50 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 51 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 52 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 53 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 54 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 55 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 56 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 57 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 58 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 59 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 60 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 61 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 62 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 63 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 64 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 65 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 66 of 378]
Date Application Received: NA
Date Application Considered as Complete: NA
60-Day Review Period Expires: NA
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: May 19, 2015
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Mike Gaffron JML Planning
Title: Senior Planner
Item Description: Storm Water & Drainage Trunk Fee Ordinance and Fee Schedule Amendment
List of Exhibits
A - Draft Ordinance per 5/11/15 Council Discussion
1. Version showing edits
2. Clean final version for adoption
B - Draft Summary Ordinance (updated) for adoption
C - Draft Fee Schedule Amendment Ordinance (updated) for adoption
D - Council Draft Minutes 5/11/15
The attached revised draft ordinance, summary ordinance and fee schedule amendment ordinance
incorporate the change directed by Council at the May 11 meeting to eliminate provisions for and
references to Redevelopment stormwater fees. Existing Section 14-285 Redevelopment Projects is
deleted from the code and the redevelopment fee provisions are eliminated from the Fee Schedule.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council review the draft ordinances, determine whether any additional
revisions are necessary, and if not, adopt the ordinances as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1.Motion to adopt the attached ordinance entitled An Ordinance Amending Article III,
Division V, Subdivision IV of the Orono Municipal Code Regarding Stormwater Trunk
Fees.
2. Motion to adopt the attached Summary Ordinance.
3. Motion to adopt the attached ordinance entitled Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 128,
Third Series Adopting the City of Orono 2015 Fee Schedule, Revising Storm Water and
Drainage Trunk Fees.
6
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 67 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 68 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 69 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 70 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 71 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 72 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 73 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 74 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 75 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 76 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 77 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 78 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 79 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 80 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 81 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 82 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 83 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 84 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 85 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 86 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 87 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 88 of 378]
Date Application Received: 03/03/15
Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/03/15
120-Day Review Period Expires: 7/1/15
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: May 21, 2015
Item No.:
______________________________________________________________________________
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Michael P. Gaffron JML Planning Dept.
Title: Senior Planner
______________________________________________________________________________
Item Description: 15-3723 Source Land Capital - Lakeview Property - 405 North Arm Dr.
- Final Plat Application - 2nd Preliminary Review
______________________________________________________________________________
Zoning District: RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre/200’
Property Area: 148.44 Acres
Application Summary: Development of 46 single family residential lots
______________________________________________________________________________
List of Exhibits
A - Native Vegetation & Management Plan (Prairie Restoration, Inc 4/3/15)
B - Lakeview Park Parameters Summary (Hiller)
C - Updated Draft Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements
D - Updated Final Plat Drawings & Engineering Plans
E - Updated City Engineer Comments 5/21/15
F - Draft Development Agreement
G - March 23 Council Minutes
Council initially reviewed the final plat submittals on March 23. Since then the applicants have
been working with staff, City Engineer and MCWD to finalize remaining details in order to gain
final plat approval. New items since the March meeting have been included for Council review,
as well as updated plat drawings and engineering plans. This memo and attachments are
provided for Council final review and comment in anticipation of Final Plat Approval on June 8.
Native Vegetation and Management Plan
Prairie Restorations Inc. has provided a written plan pursuant to the Conservation Design
requirements for establishment and maintenance of the 60+ acres of the site that will be under a
conservation easement and/or wetland easements. The plan addresses woodland management;
upland grass areas; wetlands, ponds, and stream buffers; and septic mound and alternate site
management. Seed mixes are specified as well as scheduling for establishment and maintenance
of the vegetation in the protected areas.
Park Outlot
The 4.5 acre parcel between North Arm Drive and the large pond on the site is being platted as
an outlot for privately-owned public space purposes. Applicants have submitted a set of
parameters the applicants and the Citizens for Lakeview Preservation (CLP) have agreed upon.
The space will be maintained by the Lakeview Homeowners Association, and its improvements
(trails, etc.) will be constructed by the developer. See attached submittal (Exhibit B) for more
information. The Private Park Grading Plan is Sheet C507 of the attached plan set (Exhibit D).
7
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 89 of 378]
Lakeview - Final Plat Review
May 21, 2015
Page 2
Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements
The applicants have submitted an updated draft Declaration of Covenants, Conditions,
Restrictions and Easements, attached as Exhibit C.
The City will be granted specific easements and covenants regarding the private road, the
wetlands, and the conservation area, in separate documents not subject to potential future
amendment by the HOA, to guarantee the permanence of the various provisions.
Stormwater Management
In the initial development plans, stormwater management was primarily being handled by
establishment and maintenance of the conservation areas in natural vegetation to act as a
filtration system, with no NURP ponding proposed. The plans reviewed by the Council in
March included 4 ‘biofiltration basins’ or dry ponding areas, clustered around the area where the
outlet to the large existing pond will flow under the main road through culverts. Since then the
MCWD has required the developers to incorporate additional such basins (for a total of 16)
scattered throughout the development area at locations where runoff from the new streets can be
captured and held for infiltration. The locations can be found on Sheets C401 thru C406; pond
design details are depicted on Sheets C601/602/603 of the attached plan set.
The low area in the northwest corner of the property may have been a wetland prior to
construction of the golf course in the 1950s. When the course was built that area was drained
with underground tiling. While a formal restoration of this wetland is not proposed and not
required by MCWD, the plan is to remove the draintiles and allow the low area to revert to a
natural state. The low land is within the defined Conservation Area.
Applicants have been working closely with MCWD regarding stormwater management, and final
MCWD Board approvals are expected to be granted on May 28. The MPCA has approved the
SWPPP/NPDES permit for the site.
City Engineer Comments
The development plans have undergone a number of minor engineering revisions since March,
based on comments from the MCWD and the City Engineer. Staff and Bob Bean from Bolton &
Menk met with the applicants on May 20 to review Bob’s most recent engineering comments
(see Exhibit E). It appears that all engineering issues have been or are in the process of being
addressed and will be resolved to allow for Final Plat Approval at the June 8 Council meeting.
Development Agreement
A draft of the Development Agreement drafted by the City Attorney and staff has been reviewed
by the applicants and is attached as Exhibit F.
Private Road Names
The proposed private road names include Lakeview Parkway for the main road, with cul-de-sacs
proposed to be known as Augusta Street; St. Andrews Street; Lakeview Court; and Pinehurst
Court (previously labeled as Quail Hollow Avenue).
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 90 of 378]
Lakeview - Final Plat Review
May 21, 2015
Page 3
The attached materials are presented for Council’s review and consideration, allowing Council
an opportunity to identify and ask questions regarding any issues of concern that should be
addressed prior to final plat approval scheduled for the June 8 Council meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Review the attached materials and advise staff and developer of any identified concerns that
should be further addressed prior to final plat approval.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 91 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 92 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 93 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 94 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 95 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 96 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 97 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 98 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 99 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 100 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 101 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 102 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 103 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 104 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 105 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 106 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 107 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 108 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 109 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 110 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 111 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 112 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 113 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 114 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 115 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 116 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 117 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 118 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 119 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 120 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 121 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 122 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 123 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 124 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 125 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 126 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 127 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 128 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 129 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 130 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 131 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 132 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 133 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 134 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 135 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 136 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 137 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 138 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 139 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 140 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 141 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 142 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 143 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 144 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 145 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 146 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 147 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 148 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 149 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 150 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 151 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 152 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 153 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 154 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 155 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 156 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 157 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 158 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 159 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 160 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 161 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 162 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 163 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 164 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 165 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 166 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 167 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 168 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 169 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 170 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 171 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 172 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 173 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 174 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 175 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 176 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 177 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 178 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 179 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 180 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 181 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 182 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 183 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 184 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 185 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 186 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 187 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 188 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 189 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 190 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 191 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 192 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 193 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 194 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 195 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 196 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 197 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 198 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 199 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 200 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 201 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 202 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 203 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 204 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 205 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 206 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 207 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 208 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 209 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 210 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 211 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 212 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 213 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 214 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 215 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 216 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 217 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 218 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 219 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 220 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 221 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 222 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 223 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 224 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 225 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 226 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 227 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 228 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 229 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 230 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 231 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 232 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 233 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 234 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 235 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 236 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 237 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 238 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 239 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 240 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 241 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 242 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 243 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 244 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 245 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 246 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 247 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 248 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 249 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 250 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 251 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 252 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 253 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 254 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 255 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 256 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 257 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 258 of 378]
Date Application Received: 04/22/15
Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/22/15
60-Day Review Period Expires: 06/21/15
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: 21 May 2015
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis mcc JML Planning
Title: Planner
Item Description:
#15-3735 – Chamberlain Capital LLC – 10 Myrtlewood Rd – Variances – Resolution
Zoning District: RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, 2-acres/200’ width
Lot Area: 0.89 acre (39,050 s.f.) in Orono/45,904 s.f. total, including Wayzata portion
Lot Width: 163’ within the Orono; 174’ total including portion in Wayzata
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A. Draft Resolution
Exhibit B. Survey
Exhibit C. Proposed Plans
Exhibit D. PC Staff Report & Exhibits 05/14/15
Application Summary:
The applicant proposes to redevelop the subject property. The municipal boundary between Orono and
Wayzata runs through the property which results in the property being divided into two separate parcels with
separate PIDs. The property zoned RR-1B district which has minimums of 2.0 acres and 200 feet of width. The
Orono portion has 163 feet of width and has 0.89 acre is area; the Wayzata portion has 11 feet of width at
Myrtlewood Road and has 0.15 acres in area. The threshold for administrative approval of the non-
conforming lot size in this zone is 1.0 acre per City Code 78-72; the portion in Wayzata is not independently
buildable, yet brings the property over the 1.0 acre threshold. However, in order to redevelop the property
lot width and lot area variances are required. All remaining City code requirements will be met.
Planning Commission Recommendation
A public hearing was held on May 18, 2015; there was no one present from the public to speak about the
request. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the lot area and lot width variances.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Planning staff recommends approval of the variances allowing redevelopment of this property. The City
engineer will review the plans submitted with the building permit to address any potential engineering
concerns; compliance with MCWD permitting requirements will be required.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Council should consider adopting or amending the attached resolution for approval.
8
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 259 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 260 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 261 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 262 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 263 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 264 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 265 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 266 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 267 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 268 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 269 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 270 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 271 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 272 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 273 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 274 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 275 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 276 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 277 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 278 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 279 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 280 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 281 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 282 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 283 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 284 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 285 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 286 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 287 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 288 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 289 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 290 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 291 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 292 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 293 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 294 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 295 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 296 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 297 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 298 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 299 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 300 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 301 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 302 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 303 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 304 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 305 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 306 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 307 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 308 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 309 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 310 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 311 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 312 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 313 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 314 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 315 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 316 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 317 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 318 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 319 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 320 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 321 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 322 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 323 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 324 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Adam Edwards JML Public Works Director/
Title Public Works Director/City Engineer City Engineer’s Report
____________________________________________________________________________________
Item Description: Baldur Park Road Design Guidance
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
List of Exhibits
A. Baldur Park Improvement Options, Bolton & Menk, Inc. January 20, 2015.
1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval of a design option for the Baldur
Park Reconstruction Project.
2.Background. Baldur Park Road is 1000 ft long bituminous low volume residential road. In 2014 it
received pavement condition rating of 46 out of 100. Roads with PCIs in this range require
reconstruction. In 2014 Baldur Park Road experienced sustained flooding further deteriorating its
condition. In 2014 the residents of Baldur Park Road petitioned the City to have their road rebuilt. In
2014 the City submitted for and received funding from FEMA to restore the section of road impacted by
the flooding. At the February 23, 2015 work session council directed staff to develop a way forward for
completing Baldur park reconstruction in 2015. At the March 9, 2015 Council meeting the Council
authorized Bolton and Menk to begin engineering and design.
3.Design Options. Bolton and Menk has prepared three design options for reconstruction of Baldur Park
Road. (Exhibit A)
Option Description Advantages Disadvantages
1 Full Depth
Reconstruction
Removes unstable material
Consistent pavement section
Provides longest road life
High initial cost
Significant construction disruption
2 Full Depth
Reclamation
Rehabilitates base
Lower initial cost
Minimal construction disruption
Unstable sub-grade
Inconsistent pavement structure
Reduced Roadway life
3 Partial Depth
Reconstruction
Consistent pavement section
Minimal construction disruption
Unstable sub-grade
Reduced roadway life compared to
full reconstruction
4.Cost. The table below outlines the Costs for the 3 Options. Costs do include contingency and
engineering fees.
Option Description Cost
1 Full Depth Reconstruction $413,780
2 Full Depth Reclamation $107,880
3 Partial Depth Reconstruction $180,110
5.Recommendation. I recommend the Council approve Option 3, partial depth reconstruction. It
provides a consistent and protected road structure which should reduce future maintenance costs. It is
fundable this year using FEMA funds and the General Fund Balance.
9
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 325 of 378]
5. Funding. The project could be funded with a combination of the FEMA funds provided and utilizing
remaining 2014 General Fund Balance.
Funding Source Balance
FEMA $ 59,223
General Fund Balance $ 156,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 215,223
6. Timing. The funds provided by FEMA are required to be used within 18 months of their approval.
The upcoming 2015 construction season is the best opportunity to use the FEMA funds within the
designated window. Below is the revised timeline for the project:
When What
Engineer Services Proposal to Council March 2015
Design-Bid Phase March–June 2015
Contract Award July 2015
Construction Complete October 2015
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to approve design option 3, Partial Depth Reconstruction.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 326 of 378]
May 21, 2015
City of Orono
Attn: Adam Edwards
PO Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
RE: Baldur Park Road – Improvement Options
Dear Adam:
As authorized, American Engineering and Testing (AET) has provided the City with an evaluation of the
existing pavement and soil conditions for Baldur Park Road between North Shore Drive and its terminus
(approximately 1150 ft. to the northwest). AET’s report indicates the following existing conditions:
• Average bituminous thickness of 2” to 3”
• Average aggregate base Thickness of 6” to 12”
• Subgrade soils consisting of swamp deposits (peat)
Since the subgrade materials are highly compressible and frost susceptible, AET recommends a preferred
option that consists of removing the swamp deposits to a depth of 3’ below the subgrade and replacing the
material with suitable fill. The recommended pavement section would consist of sand, aggregate base
and new pavement. With the understanding that the City’s budget and/or other factors may limit the
amount of full depth reconstruction work that is practical in this area, full-depth reclamation has been
recommend by AET as a less desirable alternative.
Based on the evaluation and recommendations provided by AET, we recommend that the City consider
the following options. All of the options include maintaining the existing profile of the road and
replacing the culvert crossings so that existing drainage patterns are maintained. No flood mitigation is
recommended at this time since FEMA did not fund mitigation related improvements.
Full Depth Reconstruction
This option would consist of complete removal of the existing pavement structure along with removal of
unstable materials below the subgrade. This option will require excavation to a depth of at least 3’ with a
width that extends a least 3’ beyond the existing pavement edge on both sides of the road. The
recommended pavement structure is as follows:
• 3.5” of bituminous
• 6” of Class 5 aggregate base
• 12” of select granular material
• Geotextile fabric
The advantages of this option include the following:
• Removal of potentially unstable subgrade materials
• Construction of a consistent pavement structure throughout the project area
• The life of the roadway would be longer compared to alternatives with a reduced scope of work
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 327 of 378]
Baldur Park Road Reconstruction
March 18, 2015
Page 2
The disadvantages of this option include the following:
• Higher initial construction cost compared to alternatives with a reduced scope of work
• Poor drainage in this area will still be a factor which limits the life of the road
• Construction will require significant disruption to the adjacent properties.
The total estimated cost for this option is $413,780.
Full Depth Reclamation
This option would consist of pulverizing the existing bituminous pavement along with a portion of the
underlying aggregate base. A portion of the reclaimed material would be removed to maintain the
existing grade of the road so that drainage patterns are maintained and the underlying subgrade materials
are not surcharged by the additional weight of the road. The recommended pavement structure for this
option is as follows:
• 3.5” of bituminous
• 6” (minimum) of reclaimed aggregate base
The advantages of this option include the following:
• Provides a rehabilitated aggregate base and new pavement structure at a lower initial construction
costs compared to full depth reconstruction
• Construction can be completed with minimal disruption to adjacent properties
The disadvantages of this option include the following:
• A potentially unstable subgrade would be left in place
• The pavement structure would not be consistent throughout the project area
• The life of the roadway would be less compared to other options
The total estimated cost for this option is $107,880.
Partial Depth Reconstruction:
This option would consist of removing and replacing the existing pavement structure to a depth of 12.5”.
The recommended pavement structure for this option is as follows:
• 3.5” of bituminous
• 9” of Class 5 aggregate base
• Geotextile fabric
The advantages of this option include the following:
• Provides a consistent pavement structure throughout the project area
• Provides separation between the aggregate base and underlying subgrade materials
• Construction can be completed with minimal disruption to adjacent properties
The disadvantages of this option include the following:
• A potentially unstable subgrade would be left in place
• The life of the roadway would be less compared to full depth reconstruction
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 328 of 378]
Baldur Park Road Reconstruction
March 18, 2015
Page 3
The total estimated cost for this option is $180,110.
In addition to the options detailed above, it is recommended that the City consider making improvements
to the sanitary sewer system. Since replacement of the sanitary sewer would be very costly and
disruptive, it is recommended that the existing sanitary sewer manholes be sealed and the existing sanitary
sewer main be lined to reduce I & I to the extent possible. The estimated construction cost of this work is
$108,580.
I will be at the City Council Meeting on May 26th to review this information with the City Council and to
seek direction on how to proceed with the project.
Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information before then.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
David P. Martini, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 329 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 330 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Adam Edwards JML Public Works Director/
Title Public Works Director/City Engineer City Engineer’s Report
____________________________________________________________________________________
Item Description: Watertown Road Joint Powers Agreement
_____________________________________________________________________________________
List of Exhibits
A- Joint Powers Agreement
B- Project Area
1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval to enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement (JPA) with the City of Long Lake to rebuild our shared portion of Watertown Road.
2.Background. Watertown Road is a Collector road for the City of Orono. From Willow Road to
Brown Road responsibility for its care is shared with the City of Long Lake due to the alignment of the
cities’ boundaries. (See Exhibit B) Orono owns 29.5% of the road surface by square footage along this
stretch of road with Long Lake owning the remainder. Long Lake is proposing to rebuild this section of
the road in 2016 and is looking to partner with Orono to do so. Long lake is considering a complete
rebuild of the road because they may replace all of the utilities that currently run under this section of
Watertown Road. Orono does not have any utilities under this section of Watertown road. At the
February 23rd Work Session the Council provided direction to staff to use reclamation costs as a basis for
Orono’s cost share in the project. On May 19th the Long Lake City Council moved to approve the
attached JPA (See Exhibit A).
3.JPA Summary. The JPA authorizes long lake to manage the project with Orono participating through
funding. Both City Councils will have to approve the final plans and the award of the project.
4.Cost. Per the JPA Orono shall contribute to 29.5% of the feasibility report, 29.5% of a surface, storm
sewer storm water management, construction administration and materials testing costs up to $133,800.
5.Funding. The project would be funded from the Pavement Management Fund.
6.Timing. Below is a revised timeline for the project.
What When
Execute JPA (Long Lake/Orono) May, 2015
Receive Feasibility Report (Long Lake/Orono) September, 2015
Design (Long Lake/Orono) October, 2015
Receive Bids February, 2016
Construction Summer 2016
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to approve the Water town Road Reconstruction JPA with Long Lake.
10
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 331 of 378]
1
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made as of the ________ day of __________________, 2015, by
and among the City of Long Lake, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called “Long Lake”), the
City of Orono, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called “Orono”). Under the authority of Minn.
Stat. §471.59, the Cities are authorized to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement for their mutual
benefit.
RECITALS
A. The City of Long Lake and the City of Orono desire to cooperate in the
development and construction of a roadway improvement project of Watertown Road, location
map reflected on Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as “Improvement Project Area”)
B. The Improvement Project Area is within the City Limits of both the City of Long
Lake and the City of Orono.
C. The Cities are cognizant of the benefits resulting from this agreement to sharing the
costs associated with the Watertown Road Improvement Project which will mutually benefit both
Cities. The Cites find that this agreement to be in their mutual best interest for the purposes set
forth herein.
D. The Improvement Project shall proceed under the authority of Minn. Stat. §429.011
et seq. to allow the assessment of special benefit to all properties benefitted by the project.
E. This agreement shall become effective upon the signature of the authorized
representatives of the parties and shall continue in force until such time as it is terminated or
modified as provided herein.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 332 of 378]
2
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared and agreed as follows:
1. Cooperation. The City of Long Lake and the City Orono shall cooperate in the
development and construction of the roadway improvement project, known as “Watertown Road
Improvement Project” (“Project”). The cooperate development is pursuant to Minn. Stat.
§471.59 et. seq. and other applicable statutes and express and implied powers of the parties. The
power and responsibilities with respect to such joint endeavor shall be exercised by the Cities,
through their City Councils and authorized designees.
2. Location. The location of the project shall be set forth in Long Lake and Orono as
depicted on the attached Exhibit A.
3. Duties. By this agreement, Long Lake may exercise powers towards the
implementation and completion of the Project on behalf of itself and on behalf of the City of
Orono; and Long Lake shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. §429.011 et seq.,
including but not limited to:
a. Ordering and preparing of all matters relative to the study and report of
feasibility on the proposed improvement, including an engineering and feasibility
report, prepare plans and specifications, hiring an appraiser, determining the
proposed area to be assessed and all related matters in the 429 process.
b. Long Lake shall, by this agreement, be permitted to award project contract
work in both cities of Long Lake and Orono. Both councils of Long Lake and
Orono shall approve the ordering of the project following completion of the items
in Paragraph (a) above.
4. Financial Duties. Long Lake and Orono acknowledge that the improvements will
provide benefit to the abutting and non-abutting properties in both Long Lake and Orono. The
anticipated project costs is $1,752,500.00. Financing of the project shall be as follows:
a. Orono Financial Obligations. Orono shall contribute to 29.5% of the feasibility
report, 29.5% of a surface, storm sewer storm water management, construction
administration and materials testing costs up to $133,800.
b. Long Lake Financial Obligations. Long Lake shall be responsible for all other
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 333 of 378]
3
costs related to the said project, subject to any amendments made in accordance
with this agreement in Paragraph (c).
c. Amendment to Financial Duties. The Cities may amend the contribution, amount
and scope upon the following:
i. Upon the receipt of the feasibility report, plans and specifications or
bids.
ii. At any other time the parties agree to an amendment.
5. Special Assessments. Under authority of this agreement, Long Lake shall conduct
and administer the assessment of all benefitted properties in Long Lake. Orono shall pay its share
in cash. Costs associated with the special assessment administration, including appeals, shall the
responsibility of Long Lake.
6. Loss. Each party shall be solely responsible for any loss, damage or injury to any
person or property arising out of the implementation of the Joint Powers Agreement and
improvements thereon by any person or persons within its jurisdiction or authority; and each party
shall hold the other harmless from and defend against any claim, demand or cause of action
initiated to recover the amount of any such loss, damage or claim for which it is responsible
pursuant to this Agreement. Each party shall carry at its own expense comprehensive liability
insurance covering its potential liability under this section with person injury limits of not less than
Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00) per person and One Million Five
Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($1,500,000.00) per occurrence and property damage
limits of Twenty-Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($25,000.00) per occurrence and Fifty
Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($50,000.00) aggregate, or such other limits as may from time to
time be required under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes §466.04 and any amendments thereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective the
day and year first above written.
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 334 of 378]
4
CITY OF LONG LAKE
By_______________________________________
Its:_____________________________________
By_______________________________________
Its:_____________________________________
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 335 of 378]
5
CITY OF ORONO
By_______________________________________
Its:_____________________________________
By_______________________________________
Its:_____________________________________
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 336 of 378]
Watertown
R
d
Grand Ave
Devin Ln
Br
o
w
n
R
d
N
Colin Dr
Ha
r
r
i
n
g
t
o
n
D
r
Gl
e
n
d
a
l
e
D
r
In
g
l
e
w
o
o
d
S
t
Br
o
w
n
R
d
S
Neilson Ave La
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
W
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
D
r
G
l
e
n
d
a
l
e
C
o
v
e
L
n
Creek Ridge Pass
Kennedy Ln
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
h
:
K
:
\
0
2
1
5
1
-
0
3
0
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
D
a
t
e
S
a
v
e
d
:
1
1
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
4
1
:
4
0
:
0
2
P
M
Watertown Road Improvement Project
Project Location
City Boundary
1 inch = 300 feet ±
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 337 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 338 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Adam Edwards JML Public Works Director/
Title Public Works Director/City Engineer City Engineer’s Report
____________________________________________________________________________________
Item Description: Beach Buoys
____________________________________________________________________________________
1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain City
Council approval for a beach buoy type.
2.Background. Several years ago the city discontinued placing
swim area buoys at our beaches due to vandalism and
maintenance issues. The Park Commission requests that the city
resume the practice of placing swim buoys at our swim beaches.
At the December 8, 2014 Council meeting the Council approved
the Beach Maintenance Standards but reserved the decision on
buoy type and placement.
3. Swim Buoys. Public works still has 7 of the buoys pictured
in storage. If approved we would place 2 buoys at Lydiard and
Summit beaches to mark the outer corners for the swim areas. If
approved, Public works will coordinate exact placement with
appropriate water body authorities.
4.Cost. The only costs associated with placing the buoys are for
new concrete anchors and chains which are minimal.
5.Recommendation. I recommend the placement of 2 buoys at Lydiard Beach and 2 Buoys at Summit
Beach. I do not recommend the installation of string buoys due to the maintenance and upkeep that
would be required. If these buoys are successful in separating boaters as swimmers then we should
consider their placement at our other beaches.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve placement of existing buoys at Lydiard and Summit Beaches.
11
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 339 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 340 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 341 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 342 of 378]
13
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 343 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 344 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 345 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 346 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
______________________________________________________________________________
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Diane Tiegs JML City Administrator’s Report/
Title City Clerk Licenses & Permits
______________________________________________________________________________
Item Description: Licenses & Permits
_____________________________________________________________________________
The following completed applications for a Garbage & Refuse Collector Licenses are attached:
1.Viet Container Corp (DBA: Veit Disposal Systems)
14000 Veit Place
Rogers, MN 55374
Veit Container is a company that only offers roll-off services in Orono.
2. Randy’s Sanitation (DBA: Randy’s Environmental Services)
4351 U.S. Hwy 12 SE
Delano, MN 55328
Randy’s Sanitation serves approximately four hundred (400) customers in Orono.
3. Blackowiak Disposal, Inc.
1195 Sunnyfield Rd N
Mound, MN 55364
Blackowiak’s Disposal serves approximately seven hundred (700) customers in Orono.
4.Waste Management
490 Industrial Blvd
Winsted, MN 55395
Waste Management serves approximately three hundred (300) customers in Orono.
Staff is recommending approval of the above listed licenses based on each applicant meeting the
licensing requirements and having a history of compliance with no complaints in recent years.
A notice of spring road restrictions was provided to each hauler.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider a motion to approve the above listed licenses.
14
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 347 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 348 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 349 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 350 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 351 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 352 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 353 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 354 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 355 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 356 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: May 26, 2015
ITEM NO:
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Diane Tiegs JML Licenses
Title City Clerk
Item Description:
Solicitor License for Council Approval
SOLICITOR LICENSE – EXTENSION REQUEST
1. Applicant: John Earl Stewart
Activity:Educational Materials
Date:To be determined upon Council approval
Time:8:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m.
Staff has reviewed the applications and completed the background investigation to issue a solicitor’s
license to John Earl Stewart of Southwester Advantage.
Orono’s code currently allows a peddler, transient merchant or solicitor to be licensed initially for 10
days, with the option for the City Council, at its sole discretion, to grant an extension for up to 50
additional days. John Earl Stewart has requested an extension of the solicitor’s license. Staff
recommends approval of the license and the extension request.
Staff would also note that prohibited activities for solicitors include:
(1) Calling attention to his or her business or items to be sold by means of blowing any horn or
whistle, ringing any bell, crying out, or by any other noise, so as to be unreasonably audible
within an enclosed structure.
(2) Obstructing the free flow of either vehicular or pedestrian traffic on any street, alley, sidewalk
or other public right-of-way.
(3) Conducting business in a way so as to create a threat to the health, safety and welfare of any
individual or the general public.
(4) Conducting business before 8:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m.
(5) Failing to provide proof of license and/or identification, when requested; or using the license
of another person.
(6) Claiming to have the endorsement of the city solely based on the city having issued a license to
that person.
(7) Remaining on the property of another when requested to leave, or to otherwise conduct
business in a manner a reasonable person would find obscene, threatening, intimidating or
abusive.
(8) Entering property that is marked with a sign or placard with the words “Peddlers or Solicitors
Prohibited” or comparable statement.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider a motion to approve the request for an extension to allow solicitation for an additional 50
days for Southwestern Advantage.
14
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 357 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 358 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 359 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 360 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 361 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 362 of 378]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: May 26, 2015
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Ron Olson JML City Administrator’s
Title: Finance Director Report
Item Description: Claims/Bills
The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is
recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 102785 to
102871, totaling $257,087.82.
Noteworthy payments include:
Boyer Truck $ 92,356.00
Payment for the purchase of plow truck #424
that was approved by Council on 2/17/15.
The City received $7,500 for the trade in of
the old 1992 plow truck.
City of Long Lake $ 37,301.00
Orono’s share of the 2014 Capital Items
purchased by the Fire Department. These
were purchased in 2014 but not billed by
Long Lake until May of 2015.
Mission Communications $ 3,990.60
The City contracts with Mission to provide
on alarm service to indicate problems at the
water plant and certain lift stations.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve payment of the claims list as presented.
15
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 363 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
2ND WIND EXERCISE INC 05/26/2015 102785 022024978 101-42110-570 fitness equipment Police Department 5,383.00
Total 102785:5,383.00
Advanced Imaging Solutions 05/26/2015 102786 73884 101-42110-401 printer maint contract 5/10 to 6/10 Police Department 139.33
Advanced Imaging Solutions 05/26/2015 102786 73884 101-41900-401 printer maint contract 5/10 to 6/10 Central Services 111.45
Advanced Imaging Solutions 05/26/2015 102786 73884 602-49450-401 printer maint contract 5/10 to 6/10 Sewer 27.87
Total 102786:278.65
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCI 05/26/2015 102787 129242-1545 101-42400-433 Membership J. Barnhart Building & Zoning 500.00
Total 102787:500.00
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF 05/26/2015 102788 50515 101-21706 Health insurance 15,596.08
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF 05/26/2015 102788 50515 101-42110-135 Disability continuation Police Department 532.74
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF 05/26/2015 102788 50515 101-21706 Health insurance 2,219.24
Total 102788:18,348.06
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 174658 101-43280-304 Lakeview Addn Special Services 1,606.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177646 602-16500 CIPP Rehab/manhole lining 481.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177647 601-16500 Well house/WTP improvement 3,945.48
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177649 651-49910-304 MS4 Admin Storm Water 615.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177650 402-48056-304 Watertown Rd imp Watertown Road 14,808.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177651 601-49400-304 GPS water system Water 3,340.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177651 602-49450-304 GPS sewer system Sewer 217.50
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177652 101-43170-304 OCB/MSA Engineering 225.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177652 651-49910-304 drainage issues Storm Water 30.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177652 601-49400-304 N. Water system exp Water 330.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177653 101-43280-304 13-3631 Northern Oaks Special Services 75.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177654 101-43280-304 15-3716 3850 Watertown Rd Special Services 450.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177655 101-43280-304 2014-00554 3759 Casco Ave Special Services 225.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177656 101-43280-304 14-3686 2500 Kelly Ave Special Services 75.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177657 101-43280-304 2335 Glendale Cove Special Services 108.00
BOLTON & MENK INC.05/26/2015 102789 177659 101-43170-304 Baldur Park Rd Engineering 375.00
Total 102789:26,905.98
BOYER TRUCKS 05/15/2015 102784 WS16270 405-48500-550 Plow Truck #424 92,356.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 364 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
BOYER TRUCKS 05/15/2015 102784 WS16270 101-39680 trade in old #424 7,500.00-
Total 102784:84,856.00
BUDGET PRINTING 05/26/2015 102790 7724 101-45210-201 punch cards Golf Course 82.00
BUDGET PRINTING 05/26/2015 102790 7800 101-42110-201 envelopes Police Department 86.17
BUDGET PRINTING 05/26/2015 102790 7820 101-42110-352 vehicle impound sheets Police Department 395.61
Total 102790:563.78
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-41600-307 ordinances Law/Legal Services 434.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-42400-307 B&Z assistance Building & Zoning 554.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-42400-307 staff meetings 4/15 Building & Zoning 1,751.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-41600-307 Gen Legal/staff/review Law/Legal Services 1,883.92
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-41600-307 Council meetings 4/15 Law/Legal Services 914.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 601-49400-307 Well site Water 62.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 101-41600-307 Fence issue Law/Legal Services 108.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-000G1 703-49960-379 Wec's appeal 542.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-004G1 101-42110-307 Police matters Police Department 248.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-024G1 101-41600-307 Amberwoods documents Law/Legal Services 134.60
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-115G6 101-41600-308 Code enforcement/ordinance violations Law/Legal Services 581.06
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-150G4 101-43290-800 litigation Special Projects-Contingencies 253.56
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-277G1 101-43280-307 3208-1 Orono Mini storage Special Services 68.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-323G5 101-43280-307 14-3690 1565 Orchard Beach Pl Special Services 76.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-327G6 101-43280-307 14-3691 405 North Arm Dr Special Services 67.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-346G2 101-43280-307 14-3686 2500 Kelly Ave Special Services 337.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-347G2 101-41600-307 Parkland addition Law/Legal Services 170.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-348G2 101-43280-307 15-3723 405 North Arm Dr Special Services 270.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-349G1 101-43280-307 15-3726 4355,4375,4245 Bayside Special Services 112.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-350G1 101-43280-307 15-3718 1125 Hunter Dr Special Services 67.50
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-351G1 101-43280-307 15-3719 3015 Watertown Rd Special Services 90.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2015 102791 2717-352G1 101-43280-307 15-3737 1150 Homestead Trl/3020 6th Ave Special Services 90.00
Total 102791:8,818.14
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 JL50615 101-41300-439 meeting expense Country Cake Administration 3.57
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 JL51815 101-41300-439 welcome breakfast-Panera Administration 21.41
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 TA50515 101-41300-489 supplies for luncheon-MPFC Administration 18.21
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 TA50615 101-45200-225 split rail fence-Menards Parks 366.84
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 TA51115 101-45200-225 split rail fence-Menards Parks 70.56
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 365 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/26/2015 102792 TA51415 602-49450-240 supplies-Northern Tool Sewer 114.72
Total 102792:595.31
CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 05/26/2015 102793 125320 101-41600-306 conflict prosecution Law/Legal Services 47.50
Total 102793:47.50
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/26/2015 102794 12734 101-42110-402 #231 brakes Police Department 469.89
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/26/2015 102794 12735 101-42110-402 #844 repairs Police Department 62.57
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/26/2015 102794 12737 101-42110-402 #233 oil change, brakes Police Department 390.23
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/26/2015 102794 12742 101-42110-402 #238 oil change Police Department 42.74
CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/26/2015 102794 12748 101-42110-402 #230 oil change Police Department 133.67
Total 102794:1,099.10
CITY OF LONG LAKE 05/26/2015 102795 201353 227-45500-530 EOC updates 20,648.60
CITY OF LONG LAKE 05/26/2015 102795 201353 227-45500-530 Radio replacement 16,652.40
Total 102795:37,301.00
CITY OF ST PAUL 05/26/2015 102796 8720 101-42110-437 data practices training-Gehlen Police Department 79.00
Total 102796:79.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO 05/26/2015 102797 801428 101-45210-091 beer Golf Course 127.00
Total 102797:127.00
DELANEY, JANIE 05/26/2015 102798 50415 101-45210-404 reimb GC supplies Golf Course 358.19
Total 102798:358.19
DELTA DENTAL 05/26/2015 102799 6008410 101-15998 003722072 Jun Cobra 363.60
DELTA DENTAL 05/26/2015 102799 6008410 101-21709 003722072 Jun Dental 1,874.05
Total 102799:2,237.65
DEPUTY REGISTRAR 05/12/2015 102781 51115 101-42110-441 Squad #240 Police Department 20.75
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 366 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Total 102781:20.75
DPC INDUSTRIES 05/26/2015 102800 827000619-1 601-49400-216 chemicals Water 354.83
DPC INDUSTRIES 05/26/2015 102800 827000620-1 601-49400-216 chemicals Water 87.00
Total 102800:441.83
EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRAINI 05/26/2015 102801 1557 101-43000-437 CPR training (8 people)Public Works Department 400.00
Total 102801:400.00
FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2 05/26/2015 102802 132971 601-49400-240 battery Water 154.50
Total 102802:154.50
FRESHWATER SOCIETY 05/26/2015 102803 174 101-42400-439 room rental Navarre meeting Building & Zoning 272.25
Total 102803:272.25
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006105567 101-41900-404 mats council chambers Central Services 10.80
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006105569 101-41900-404 city hall mats Central Services 21.20
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006709227 101-43000-221 towels Public Works Department 8.63
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006709227 101-43000-226 uniform Public Works Department 23.39
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006709227 601-49400-226 uniform Water 11.69
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006709227 602-49450-226 uniform Sewer 11.70
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006754925 101-43000-221 towels Public Works Department 8.63
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006754925 101-43000-226 uniform Public Works Department 23.39
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006754925 601-49400-226 uniform Water 11.70
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006754925 602-49450-226 uniform Sewer 11.69
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006777822 101-43000-221 towels Public Works Department 6.38
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006777822 101-43000-226 uniform Public Works Department 23.39
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006777822 601-49400-226 uniform Water 11.69
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 1006777822 602-49450-226 uniform Sewer 11.70
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 987053 601-49400-226 uniform Water 62.70
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 987053 602-49450-226 uniform Sewer 62.69
G & K SERVICES 05/26/2015 102804 987053 101-43000-226 uniform Public Works Department 125.39
Total 102804:446.76
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 367 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
GEFFRE INTERIORS 05/26/2015 102805 38880 101-45210-404 carpet and floor trim Golf Course Golf Course 2,273.40
Total 102805:2,273.40
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/26/2015 102806 271047 101-43000-222 signal lamp Public Works Department 8.27
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/26/2015 102806 271050 101-45210-223 supplies Golf Course 35.43
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/26/2015 102806 271838 101-42110-402 supplies Police Department 93.30
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/26/2015 102806 272165 101-43000-224 supplies Public Works Department 4.29
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/26/2015 102806 272199 101-43000-221 batteries Public Works Department 491.80
Total 102806:633.09
HEATHER GEHLEN 05/26/2015 102807 50815 101-42110-437 meal reimb PLEAA conference Police Department 32.01
Total 102807:32.01
HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/26/2015 102808 1000060559 101-41900-319 network support Central Services 50.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/26/2015 102808 1000060560 101-41900-319 network support Central Services 50.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/26/2015 102808 1000060561 101-41900-319 network support Central Services 50.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/26/2015 102808 1000060562 101-41900-319 network support Central Services 50.00
Total 102808:200.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/26/2015 102809 1000060425 101-42110-414 radio lease and MDC billing Police Department 2,227.69
Total 102809:2,227.69
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL 05/26/2015 102810 39462 101-42110-437 EMR refresher course Police Department 650.00
Total 102810:650.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 05/26/2015 102811 1000060278 101-41600-309 jail charges Law/Legal Services 338.00
Total 102811:338.00
JACKIE YOUNG 05/26/2015 102812 50715 101-41300-319 CC meeting 4/13, 4/27 Administration 505.00
JACKIE YOUNG 05/26/2015 102812 50715 101-42400-319 PC meeting 4/20 Building & Zoning 165.00
Total 102812:670.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 368 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
JEREMY BARNHART 05/26/2015 102813 51515 101-41300-439 reimb coffee for Bldg Official interview Administration 14.23
Total 102813:14.23
JR S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 05/26/2015 102814 86155 603-49500-442 Spring citywide clean up 300.00
Total 102814:300.00
KELLY HERZOG 05/26/2015 102815 50815 101-42110-437 mileage reimb PLEAA conf Police Department 159.13
KELLY HERZOG 05/26/2015 102815 50815 101-42110-437 meal reimb PLEAA conf Police Department 28.72
Total 102815:187.85
LARSEN, GREGG 05/26/2015 102816 52015 101-22205 Escrow refund 2014-00904 2,000.00
Total 102816:2,000.00
LOGIS 05/26/2015 102817 40113 101-42110-329 internet 4/15 Police Department 193.50
LOGIS 05/26/2015 102817 40113 101-41900-329 internet 4/15 Central Services 193.50
LOGIS 05/26/2015 102817 40113 101-42110-310 police records 4/15 Police Department 5,347.00
LOGIS 05/26/2015 102817 40176 101-42110-575 PD switch setup Police Department 525.00
LOGIS 05/26/2015 102817 40176 101-41900-401 storage issue Central Services 157.50
Total 102817:6,416.50
LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/26/2015 102818 B257734 101-45210-223 supplies Golf Course 11.98
LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/26/2015 102818 B259016 101-45200-225 spreader Parks 19.99
LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/26/2015 102818 B259510 602-49450-227 supplies Sewer 4.58
Total 102818:36.55
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/26/2015 102819 2152981 651-49910-227 sweeper parts Storm Water 61.91
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/26/2015 102819 2153256 651-49910-227 sweeper parts Storm Water 119.01
Total 102819:180.92
MADISON NATIONAL LIFE 05/26/2015 102820 1170480 101-21713 Jun LTD 1,444.82
Total 102820:1,444.82
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 369 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/26/2015 102821 477602 101-43000-212 Diesel Public Works Department 234.47
MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/26/2015 102821 477603 101-42110-212 Fuel PD Police Department 2,784.17
Total 102821:3,018.64
MCFOA 05/26/2015 102822 52015 101-41300-433 membership D. Tiegs Administration 35.00
MCFOA 05/26/2015 102822 52015 101-41500-433 membership S. Pettit Finance Department 35.00
Total 102822:70.00
MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTA 05/26/2015 102823 43015 101-20809 Sac 4,970.00
MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTA 05/26/2015 102823 43015 101-39610 SAC credit 49.70-
Total 102823:4,920.30
MEYERS OUTDOOR SERVICES 05/26/2015 102824 4121 101-45200-404 April lawn service Parks 2,175.00
Total 102824:2,175.00
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLI 05/26/2015 102825 188058618 101-45210-092 beverages Golf Course 317.76
Total 102825:317.76
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMP 05/26/2015 102826 171125379 101-43000-415 acetylene, oxygen Public Works Department 24.60
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMP 05/26/2015 102826 171125380 101-42110-221 oxygen Police Department 39.00
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMP 05/26/2015 102826 171125381 101-42110-221 oxygen Police Department 9.76
Total 102826:73.36
MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/26/2015 102827 29702 101-43000-221 knob Public Works Department 13.43
MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/26/2015 102827 7313 101-43000-403 whacker compactor repair Public Works Department 35.41
Total 102827:48.84
MINT ROOFING 05/26/2015 102828 58621 101-41900-404 Post Office roof repair Central Services 114.64
Total 102828:114.64
MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LL 05/26/2015 102829 40029655 601-49400-403 Annual alarm service Water 347.40
MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LL 05/26/2015 102829 40029655 602-49450-403 Annual alarm service Sewer 3,643.20
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 370 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Total 102829:3,990.60
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-34210 Apr sales tax 2.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-34650 Apr sales tax 6.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 601-20806 Apr sales tax 319.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37910 Apr sales tax 1,296.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37920 Apr sales tax 238.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37930 Apr sales tax 83.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37935 Apr sales tax 32.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37940 Apr sales tax 24.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37960 Apr sales tax 11.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37970 Apr sales tax 4.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 05/26/2015 102830 43015 101-37990 Apr sales tax 215.00
Total 102830:2,230.00
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGE 05/26/2015 102831 51215 602-49450-441 Wastewater certification G. Palmer Sewer 23.00
Total 102831:23.00
MTI DIST CO 05/26/2015 102832 1008312-00 101-45210-404 irrigation pump service Golf Course 591.25
Total 102832:591.25
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 283654 101-42110-201 lint roll Police Department 7.49
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 283970 101-42110-201 supplies Police Department 28.33
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 283981 601-49400-227 key Water 1.99
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 284429 101-45200-223 supplies Parks 54.97
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 284429 101-45200-221 supplies Parks 15.97
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 284448 101-42110-221 repair supplies Police Department 33.98
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 284498 101-45210-221 supplies Golf Course 94.34
NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/26/2015 102833 284531 101-42110-228 staples Police Department 17.97
Total 102833:255.04
NORLINGS 05/26/2015 102834 30519 101-45200-319 Livingston Park design Parks 850.00
Total 102834:850.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 371 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CA 05/26/2015 102835 772 101-42110-437 first repsonder refresher Police Department 100.00
Total 102835:100.00
O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 546 05/26/2015 102836 43015 101-42110-402 car wash Police Department 60.50
Total 102836:60.50
O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 05/26/2015 102837 43015 101-42110-402 car washes Police Department 223.68
Total 102837:223.68
OFFICE DEPOT 05/26/2015 102838 7691294300 101-41900-201 office supplies Central Services 149.84
OFFICE DEPOT 05/26/2015 102838 7691294300 101-41900-201 office supplies Central Services 8.30
OFFICE DEPOT 05/26/2015 102838 7691294300 101-41900-201 office supplies Central Services 8.30
Total 102838:166.44
OHRT, CARTER 05/26/2015 102839 51215 999-10015 UB refund 1,025.42
Total 102839:1,025.42
OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC 05/26/2015 102840 568667-001 101-43000-224 supplies Public Works Department 6.95
OIL AIR PRODUCTS INC 05/26/2015 102840 569008-001 101-43000-224 supplies Public Works Department 108.40
Total 102840:115.35
OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE INC 05/26/2015 102841 558679 101-43000-404 hoist inspection Public Works Department 140.00
Total 102841:140.00
OTTEN BROTHERS 05/26/2015 102842 11396937 101-45210-223 supplies Golf Course 10.99
OTTEN BROTHERS 05/26/2015 102842 11398995 101-45210-223 landscape supplies Golf Course 27.99
OTTEN BROTHERS 05/26/2015 102842 31061344 101-45210-223 flowers Golf Course 65.98
Total 102842:104.96
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 05/26/2015 102843 16065B 231-45650-436 Acura 100.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 372 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Total 102843:100.00
PIRTEK 05/26/2015 102844 2089980 101-43000-221 backhoe repair Public Works Department 134.44
Total 102844:134.44
PLEAA 05/26/2015 102845 50815 101-42110-437 conference registration K. Herzog, H. Gehlen Police Department 170.00
Total 102845:170.00
POSTMASTER 05/12/2015 102782 51215 101-41900-322 Srping Newsletter Central Services 655.30
Total 102782:655.30
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 05/26/2015 102846 30423 602-49450-406 LS 16 repair Sewer 2,885.00
Total 102846:2,885.00
RC ELECTRIC INC 05/26/2015 102847 4693 101-45210-404 fountain repair Golf Course 277.08
Total 102847:277.08
REED VENDING 05/26/2015 102848 9043 101-45210-094 concession supplies Golf Course 169.90
Total 102848:169.90
SECURITY & SOUND CO 05/26/2015 102849 14981 101-42110-401 control board replacement Police Department 85.00
Total 102849:85.00
SEH 05/26/2015 102850 296538 601-49400-304 Sprint upgrades Water 2,486.30
Total 102850:2,486.30
SELECT ACCOUNT 05/26/2015 102851 50615 101-41900-319 participant fee Central Services 94.50
Total 102851:94.50
SELECT ACCOUNT 05/26/2015 102852 51215 101-21719 5/5/15 FLEX 400.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 373 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Total 102852:400.00
SELECT ACCOUNT 05/26/2015 102853 51815 101-21719 5/18/15 FLEX 246.01
Total 102853:246.01
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 05/26/2015 102854 8032-1 602-49450-403 paint Sewer 271.50
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 05/26/2015 102854 8114-7 602-49450-403 paint Sewer 89.30
Total 102854:360.80
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1145462 101-42110-226 uniforms Schoenherr Police Department 324.97
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1145650 101-42110-226 uniforms Stensrud Police Department 171.94
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146001 101-42110-226 uniforms Spencer Police Department 139.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146487 101-42110-226 uniforms Sturm Police Department 129.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146491 101-42110-226 Lt. bar Police Department 5.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146532 101-42110-226 uniforms McCoy Police Department 74.97
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146564 101-42110-226 uniforms Spencer Police Department 95.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146863 101-42110-226 uniforms Fournier Police Department 139.96
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1146998 101-42110-226 uniforms Datwyler Police Department 887.87
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147000 101-42110-226 uniforms Hooper Police Department 89.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147002 101-42110-226 uniforms Olson Police Department 937.37
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147126 101-42110-226 uniforms Persell Police Department 106.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147159 101-42110-226 uniforms Datwyler Police Department 174.96
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147160 101-42110-226 uniforms Olson Police Department 150.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147232 101-42110-226 uniforms Spanjers Police Department 123.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147358 101-42110-226 uniforms Russeth Police Department 90.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147419 101-42110-226 uniforms Sturm Police Department 51.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147494 101-42110-226 uniforms J. Wittke Police Department 26.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147504 101-42110-226 uniforms Vargas Police Department 18.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1147576 101-42110-226 uniforms McCoy Police Department 100.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1148003 101-42110-226 nameplate Police Department 7.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1148300 101-42110-228 ammo Police Department 311.76
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1148326 101-42110-226 uniforms Datwyler Police Department 288.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1148581 101-42110-226 uniforms Olson Police Department 158.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1148737 101-42110-226 uniforms Spencer Police Department 237.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149093 101-42110-226 uniforms Vargas Police Department 69.96
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149131 101-42110-226 uniforms Persell Police Department 45.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149132 101-42110-226 uniforms J. Wittke Police Department 49.00
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 374 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149405 101-42110-226 uniforms Spanjers Police Department 96.99
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149468 101-42110-226 uniforms Olson Police Department 70.96
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149609 101-42110-226 uniforms Vargas Police Department 55.98
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1149807 101-42110-226 uniforms J. Wittke Police Department 90.00
STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/26/2015 102855 1150009 101-42110-550 #224 teardown Police Department 400.00
Total 102855:5,725.51
TASER INTERNATIONAL 05/26/2015 102856 12468933 101-42110-580 taser Police Department 809.95
Total 102856:809.95
TEEMASTER CORPORATION 05/26/2015 102857 201510027 101-45210-340 2015 service fee Golf Course 500.00
Total 102857:500.00
TESSMAN COMPANY 05/26/2015 102858 212795 101-45210-223 landscape supplies Golf Course 1,077.04
TESSMAN COMPANY 05/26/2015 102858 213102 101-45210-223 landscape supplies Golf Course 668.25
Total 102858:1,745.29
THORPE DIST CO 05/26/2015 102859 891848 101-45210-091 beer Golf Course 88.75
THORPE DIST CO 05/26/2015 102859 893617 101-45210-091 beer Golf Course 81.60
Total 102859:170.35
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 05/26/2015 102860 102281 101-43000-221 welding supplies Public Works Department 8.28
Total 102860:8.28
TONY WITTKE 05/26/2015 102861 50715 101-42110-437 tuition reimb Police Department 1,188.24
Total 102861:1,188.24
TREE TOP SERVICE 05/18/2015 102772 346 101-43000-224 speed bump Public Works Department 724.69-
Total 102772:724.69-
TRI CITY LAB 05/26/2015 102862 43015 601-49400-489 water testing Water 31.50
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 375 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 13
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Total 102862:31.50
TUMA EXCAVATING LLC 05/26/2015 102863 42615 601-49400-405 excavation for water shutoff 3484 Lyric Water 450.00
Total 102863:450.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 05/26/2015 102864 238397 101-42110-226 commendation bars Police Department 37.20
Total 102864:37.20
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV 05/26/2015 102865 52015 101-41900-322 postage for meter Central Services 2,000.00
Total 102865:2,000.00
US BANK CM-9703 05/26/2015 102866 9276302 101-41900-319 HSA account maintenance fee Central Services 158.50
Total 102866:158.50
WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 05/26/2015 102867 9469-2808-2 603-49500-316 Recycling May 8,723.20
Total 102867:8,723.20
WESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCI 05/26/2015 102868 51115 101-43290-800 donation for co-hosting Navarre Night Special Projects-Contingencies 250.00
Total 102868:250.00
WILLIAMS TOWING 05/26/2015 102869 125289 231-45650-436 13-16658 1997 Jeep Cherokee 200.00
Total 102869:200.00
WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 05/26/2015 102870 51015 602-49450-381 4/01 to 5/01 Sewer 29.17
WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 05/26/2015 102870 51015 101-43000-381 4/01 to 5/01 Public Works Department 108.50
Total 102870:137.67
ZONE ONE LOCATING 05/26/2015 102871 21666 101-45210-404 GC utility locates Golf Course 158.20
Total 102871:158.20
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 376 of 378]
City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 14
Check Issue Dates: 5/12/2015 - 5/26/2015 May 21, 2015 09:45AM
Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice
Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount
Grand Totals: 257,087.82
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 377 of 378]
Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 378 of 378]