Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-07-1983 Planning Packeti itte' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. MONDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1983 *Asterick items are considered to be routine items to be encacted upon by one motion by the Planning Commission under the Conc'Piit Item* on the agenda* Discussion will be held upon request. Council Representative - Mayor Mary Butler Call to Order PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:30 P.M. #723 Ski Tonka, Inc., 4520 Bayside Road “ Preliminary Subdivision 2. 7:45 P.M. #724 Bruce B. Dayton, 640 Old Long Lake Road - Preliminary Subdivision 3. 8:00 P.M. #726 Willieun D. Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Vacation FIVE MINUTE RECESS Action 4. #722 Ski Tonka, Inc. 4740 Bayside Road - Variance 5. #725 Bob Skinner, 3420 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit 6. #728 Gabriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road - Variance Information Items Select Planning Commission to attend Council meeting of March 14, 1983 Approval of Minutes 7. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of December 6, 1982 8. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of January 17, 1983 IISSION MEETING (ERS 7:30 P.M. lUARY 7, 1983 >e routine items to be encacted upon ission under the Cons^^it Item* on the >on request . r Butler , 4520 Bayside Road - Preliminary i, 640 Old Long Lake Road - Preliminary pry, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Vacation de Road - Variance le Drive - Conditional Use Permit iwa Road - Variance Ld Council meeting of March 14, 1983 Minutei of December 6, 1982 Minutes of January 17, 1983 ^ i i* ■ M '.♦*1 ■iJ r ■i. *.|f: i#vf/a4^t trUkAfy -J, AGE OF OMNO •V: K- yv riLUeti V ^tttt bi./' .a T TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 2, 1983 SUBJECT: #723 Ski Tonka, Inc. - A520 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District - RR-IA Area - 37.3 acres (wetlands = 8.6, dry = 28.7) Application - Subdivision - plat 3 lots Planning Commission Action - --- Exhibits: r A. Property Owners List B. Letter to DNR 1: Letterfrornennepin County Highway Department E. Revised Preliminary Plan Hennepin County has reviewed the m^K^b^ !ra?rd%riareLfaf;orsM^^ r- HlWrllZ rsraSTtshld^rd^hruirno^cLnge because of the platting. 'Staff finds their request for an such’^as^'LyLde^Beach and tent with previous ,^»=Vpd for^33' from the center line not 40’. the Popov addition, the County ask ,.v,a|. we find the request incon-I have notified the Highway °®P®»^tment that we find the req sistent, and unless they welfare, Se mustdeal with hazards to the public health, safety and weita recommend denying the additional right-of-way. The DKR has been contacted concerning the proposed plat but staff has heard nothing. A park fee will be sought for lots 2 and 3 at $100.00 each for a total fee of $200.00. Staff recommends approval of the 3 ^°tPlat application satisfied and finding all standards of the RR-IA Zoning Disr «eated\of Unes.'^Sis^a^^roval is subject to the following conditions: 1 Applicant execute a flowage & conservation easement ’ over the designated wetlands ar-2a. "s. i .4 page -- mm eliminary Subdivision idation of preliminary (, ■■ g safe separate access must be ,t be as far west. Lot access ! of the platting. it-of-way inconsis- Bayside Beach and center line not 40*. le request incon- 1 findings that slfare, we must lat but staff has 0 each for a total ion of Ski-Tonka Inc. ave been satisfied and cks from all newly following conditions: easement :.K #723“Ski Tonka, Inc.4520 Bayside RoadPage '2- 2. Access to lots shall be as approved by Hennepin County Highway Department in their letter of January 27, 1983. 3. If lot 1 is to use the alternate septic site at some future date, the existing well must be abandoned and a new well site found on the property. 4. To recommend that County maintain 66* right-of-way width for CSAH 84 and that if the County finds there is real need for the additional 7' requested by the county because of proposed improvements along the curved area, to approve the request. some and ay here the e Kl <\J K» If) in •H Oo a Kl Ul CO M r* < 0) H u. -J M O N < u >• in UJ H X i X KC O QC H U CD U m M M cn >- •-4 CO r-4 I r-l Kl O CM inco Kl O U U CD ^ Z Z lA l§|£ M M M -i X X CA ^ CD ^ S u. min 3o QC in > uj ^ 3 UJ o Z X Z M 5 HI in < « 5CL < Q, Ul GOCQ Ml Ulcr: o -i Ui CO M) CL Ul O ^ ^ ^ CO ^ Z Ja: Mr De 12 St Ti r< ai Y> t' h •tlLOj # r4 Ooo u o H O lA lO lA iA ly S -J M e N { W S — _ «SEw:* ^ s*"*® gi • j< o * w oe«1»Ssiss3 >■ N ..SSrSfcSlS o ^ I ^il i i ,'-?? ■ 1li *5 V <1 >4* /1 ■‘••l.-J ■■■mil ‘■- Wm >• ■ y . fc V .r: M tlf- ■> 1? rm ill# mm W- CITY ®f ORONO ,.™« omc U«i «l.C,y.Ul B.,. Minno*... ie..M»nicip.l Omc« On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka . J January 19, 1983 Mr Del Barberdepartment of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Mn. 55106 RE: *723 - S!;i Tonka Inc. - Subdivision Dear Mr. BarberL-rcai -- - - - - . The above referenced ®"^^j,^^“°co^ission! ‘"w^wluld appreciate rn;1:;“you''^arra^e* crncf^^ the proposed subdivisron. Vour response should “^^f/,^°i^«%nrthf publirhear^ reld^brtne^ri-i^rCo-ist^n^L Monday, February 7. 1983. I I 1 V A. . /-affiofa if vou have additional questionsPlease contact my office i£ you na Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator jAM/msw •'"^StSSINC, ; . 4717357 APMIMSTRATIO^ a UNANtl-. 173 73SM «71735‘* FROM: DATE: 1 SUBJECT: This appl testing c this Lot field. " and sept Lot 3) a Testing ’ the exis approxim site cou filled. Testing recent t report i althougl site anc at some at some can be appears Note th mottlin percola rearran The ne> until c OR(WO Municipal Office* < A 5f being i appreciate Lvision. bruary 1# 1983 lie hearing 7, 1983. IttrtkjMIKS 47J>15^ > TO. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael P. caffron. Septic System Inspector OATE: January 14, 1983 Evaluation for subject: #723, 4520 Bayside Road, Septic Systems. This aPPli«^°^he%roUfe«tion o^steerslpe/and^wetlands^^^Tes^ testing to indicate suitable include the existing house ““ “* “and septic system on the adgacen p Lot 3) are vacant lana. fnLot 3) are vacant land. alternate system for Testing was P®>^*°>^"®%"?3'?|tttng ^^s^^done lirectly ^e!l'^°“?his the existing house. Th ^^igting but apparently abandoned and approximately 20 after the existing well is P mpI and 5-6 MPI*site could be fs eLountered at this site were 27 ^pi filled. |i?e of the shed in 1977 (about testing Testing done on tl'® average perc rate of ^ at the proposed siterecent testing) ^^efor Ibsence of mottling at the prop^^ report indicates th P water was encountered. ^ ^as present although both state observed indicate that sligh svstem be required site and soil samples aooears that should a mound y that a mound at some depth: “o”®''®’^'lat area exists on this “^e s „ «,« fU.jr. a.t.. th. ho... ... t55.K. S*B. i« .otklh, oonhltton. .........;rirt“ irZ;;; - Rearranging lot lines. . . rtirdevfiopL!"%^~n^ - - • •=••- y.- m wm . vV- uation for equires soil nds. Tests on :or use as drain** :he existing house le new Lot 2 (an :ernate system for of the house jte well. This Lv abandoned and 27 MPI and 5-6 MPI. 100* from the Neither testing he proposed site nspection of the .ing was present rstero be required Lte so that a mound .paired in 1977 and te soils with t no water ction in need not be tested roved. Is: w •i. V ft I « iii ■ • ;I?_____ ^ ■pWB mm ’! ■ ■■' J DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOTTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 HENNEPIN Q35-3381 January 27, 1983 Ms. Jeanne Habusth zoning administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 FEB - 21'*iie^ Hennepin County Plat Review and ReconinendationsReview ana rw-wwib..—- - Minnesota Statutes 505.02 ^ ?oSS it iti center of CSRH 84.Block 1 n«st be located at the existing access ^ proposed access for lot 1. Block 1 nu _ _ _ _ fcrLot2 Block 1 ««8t be located near the vest lot line ■s ESS SErlSJS uXW w* -3 . ______ a-W* »rv?*sThe existing ^ £?S.rrCS.TE “^-.. . _ A _ _ A_h-11 on CSBH 84 east of Ring Route Road, Bennepin^ty -Because of the severe hill from CSAH 84 to Parcel 24 iO. We review^ "" cmc^s l^dlound an acceptable location Si Ring Route Road. w„,,» »»•». c»«y EEKiS ^ roflilires an appr f^^rai^aae and utility constructiw, trail:;alty*^r«dt “ ^iTitl'cSruS^riu aevelo^tj^ si%rl2iS^e'Divisicn for utility pemut fonss. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer am m - 2 '983 re County review of Lat and found It ate an additional 40 feet from f existin9 access* the %iest lot line* b 2 access. the access for d, Hennepin County I. We reviewed sptable location s or a change in before beginning t forms* es an approved des but is not fnent» and dt forms* :OUNTY rmpioycr Ms* Jeanne Mabusth 2 January 27, 1983 ^ develoE>ec imist restore all areas disturbea during construction within County right of way* Please direct any response or questions to Weigelt. Sincerely ■-4...'ll 1^1-4 jmB8 M* Wold, P.E* Chief, Planning and Programning Vi*ri 01^Bos64*CnfW<Mr, Brent A32 Midlan MlnneapolJ WOTICE OP PI Date of Meet Votes: 4 Planning API API API Dei Tal Tal notes AMD Si easement c approved fa 27, 1983. property. for CSAH 8 T treeanm ndevelope Applies Applies additic maeting for the In all easea requested Ir or the City If the eppH contact the VLVrrot ui&OrvuBoi eS*Ciyfl(«l Bay, MinnMota 55323 •Municipal Offices **"’ TMephona 473>7357 Control Mo.723 Mr, Brent William Primus ^32 Midland Bank Building Minneapolis, Mn. 55401''2350 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision* Preliminary Date of Motiee 2-8-83 MOTlCS OP PXAMMIMG COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting _ Votes : 4 For Against Planning Ooimnission recoinnends the following: Approval: As submitted ” Approvals Subject to conditions noted ~ Approvals Additional information required before Council meeting ' Denials For reasons noted ~ Triads Pending receipt of additional information from applicant ~ Tabled: Pending review others* or further Planning Comnission study _ Mo action required MOTES AND SPECIAX* CONDITIONS 1* Applicant execute a flowage & conservation easement over the designated wetlands area. 2. Access to lots shall be as approved by Hennepin County Highway Department in their letter of January 27, 1983. 3. If lot 1 is to use the alternate septic site at some future 1 I . 1 i date, the existing well must be abandoned and a new well site found on the property. 4. To recommend that the County maintain right*of~way width for eSAH 84 and that If the County finds there is real need for the additional "T*"’1recali^b df ptdposdd imptoVediehcs alon^ che curved area to recommeTr3""TTi^T*** XtOJUlAiJ 40^ S. V a rlt nii_ o f ^9nfl , Hfl -------------- '1 [3 ndeveloped lot 0 $100.00) See'Attached Sheet Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Council March 14, 1^83□Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent,upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the . . . - meeting is_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _t or_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ for the_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _meeting. /' In all cases* the application must be continued with the submittal of requested or the City will consider the application as formally withdra%m If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information* please intact the Zoning Administrator. T# you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes ^ y are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review ^ ^ Planning Commission. 7^ Mi ••V.S II :* ’iir” Setbaci Applicant : beeping of newly crea >23ine«Ltional Vmm Parmit .vision* PraXiminary :iee 2-8-83 Council maatin^ I from applicant ining Oomnisaion ce & conservation > lots shall be as ttter of January :e at some future tite found on the ight-of-way width td for the additional CO recommena nn cnac T* ^ raeaipt of s'* ibadttal of lra%m. Ion* plaaaa Soiranisalon Minutas f upon raviaw "fPW- 6. Setback* for ell accessory structures meet the * J:sji:rof^:-;--:*»‘-:y ‘5r:or:rer:h: ;:5u;::a‘’!5S?%etbeck fro. newly created lot lines. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Di Applicati Area - 25 Planning The revis elevatior contiguoi inisjudgec with more original! The share the draii Lot 1. The prop* and stee area to another in consi area* th topograp the seel the exis construe designat cul de s Staff re TO recon all star all sept maintair ed oetbacks* d £or the setback froft V-IM TO:Planning Commission Members FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:February 3, 1983 SUBJECT:#724 - Bruce B. Dayton Preliminary Subdivision - 640 Old Long Lake Road - Zoning District - RR-IB Application • subdividion “ Area - 25.75 acres Planning Commission Action Plat - Four lots Public Hearing - Recommendation of preliminary approval or denial The revised preliminary plan has designated the wetlands |t the 962 elevation. Note: Lots 2 and ^ contain the^requrred contiguous land. The surveyor h ^ow crediting Lots 2 and 3 misjudged the extent of the ^ realign the lot lines aswith more dry land. There was no need to realign tne lu originally requested. s tss.‘.raJ ss*. Lot 1. The proposed cul de *'^^^®f;,’^'';^e^orlgtLr?oci?ion?l Tllf^ "r?hl sSuth"rf%hl existing-house,was reported to contain another drainfield line. in consideration of Dayton's total plan for the developn«nt^of^the area, the orilfinvS^ved propirty owners to maintainrircarruftif^-ro the area s^ the existing road to serve the road outlot now Hgnated^ra !^^:id?h may%t!u^how the location of the future cul de sac . Staff recommendation: ... 1 a. nrncG B. Dayton finding TO recommend approval of the been satisfied and that ^11 standards of the RR-IB Zoning Distri ^i^hin the City have been all septic standards for rural to the following conditions:Maintained and that this approval is sub]ecL to tn. ii ■4 Mir‘ * I . mm r-m \ymi I m m ':v®f 19 I #724 - B February Page 2 1.Appl prot 2.If resl road 3.The over 4.The the 5. Payr Lot Lot Tot Road - tion of ial it the 962 icres of dry .nally :s 2 and 3 lines as jned so that irt are within D the wooded 3n, a flat contain nt of the the steep to maintain etaining not to lutlot now the future ton finding fied and that have been ing conditions #724 - Bruce Dayton February 3# 1983 Page 2 Applicant execute a Flowage & Conservation Easement for future protection of designated wetlands. Tf outlet A is developed in the future creating a<5fitional -aantial lots a cul de sac must be installed and the plat rltd brought up lo current standards for rural development. The City will ask for an underlying road and utility easement over the road outlot. The applicant must execute a maintenance agreement to assure the upkeep and maintenance of the private road. Payment of a park fee determined as follows: Lot 2 0 $200.00 Lot 3 0 $200.00 Total $400.00 1 1 Lii.'y/ O 5-Ha • Uio o :a I M K)N SV. M H UJs p 5 P O O lA 3 M 1^ CM I P •H «-4 I PK> S UJ 5?^ f-4 O' 1^inin PP o < yj III O < u u KlS ^ £> iPC o: o* < S CO a 3 H Oo Xu ►- p gSag Uu •* * ss •H1 < < o <«n -i H* r4 1M) 3 Ui tn o «i «• o «(in •a 3 < CM P CM *J ^ NP ^ ^ o >- UI N^ *J p >- P o <Kl O O O P 3 PP < < O O Kl 3 f>C Q •H Cko ®8 a- to a O to u -J Ck lA tel <lA to -J t- CM H- UJ 8 1 Ck p <9 >- yj iM ^ ^ fH C ^ lu £ ^ ot u _ • < < ►- < Ki o c u >: 5. o u u ^ tf> o O < Kl O X X 1^ 3 ^ O O OLo O Oo fA o 3 ifti fo -J CM H* I Ik SS I •n o lA'' O C9 o to o 35gS8: 3: S n u 3 5“Si '"is«• ui O H- o q: tfl I/I VA O oc» to to to C4 CO »*c 55 •-» Mc r is; 16-o kf tel ►- ►- ►- ►- I/I ID Ik Oa•t ao Ck teJ Ik So: O ru.< Cl < tel CL I* :t >: < ft < i:: b *- I m-T-.r-CX MR. BRUCE 990 OLD LO WAYZATA, M VOTICB OP P] Date of Meet Votes: 4 Planning O API API API Der Tal Tat No NOTES AND SI pT) Applies Applica additic ■aetinc for the In all caaea ifsgoaatad In or thaClty If tk* Wll ■ ' -A I [M.■iV • !L I mm 1^>:'!13MMm9B^ li UMU Bu M*C«y«lal B«y. tdinimota S63S3*M«iikipal OCRom TtkpbPM 473>7S(7 ♦• '4V :-;^nsSl%' ^<.4 i Oontrol Mo.724 U Variance Conditional Uae Pemit MR. BRUCE B. DAYTON 990 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD WAYZATA. MN. 55391 X Subdivision* Preliadnary Date of notice ttOTICB OP PIANNIMG COMMISSION ACTION 2-7-83l>ate of Meeting _ Votes: 4___ For Against Ned Dayton Merrill* Lynch Realty/Burnet ..315 E. Lake Street Wayzata* Mn. 55391 Flanoing Oonnission recomnends the following: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Fending receipt of additional inforsiation from applicant Tabled: Fending review by others* or further Planning Comisaion study Mo action required NOTES AMD SOCIAL CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED LIST Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission ________ Council Marrh 21. 1 Qft^ Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent,i^on r additional information* Deadline for the •sating is___________________ for the - ipt of or Sleeting* In all eases* the application must be continued with the submittal of rsgtttff^ information within or tha City will consider the application as formally withdrawn If tlia applicant has trouble obtaining additional information* please contact the Zoning Administrator. . .. .,1. It .Jit i V: It you fas ire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes .. era available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review nd app^^val by the Planning Commission. mm ■ n v\ r... J'i- TV;; wmwMm miii' #724 - Bri February i 1. Appli' area Janua 2.If Ou lots» curre 3.The C the I 4.The 6 upkec 5.Paymi Lot : Lot ! 72A • V. Lonal Um Paxait Lsion* miiadnary ee Realty/Burnet eet 391 »uiieil mMting txom applicant lug Ooaadaaion eaipt of aittal of n, plaaao mission Ninutss ipon review m,: mI - ” V- v^vi « jfl., g ■ *!i ifir. ' #724 • Bruce Dayton February 7t 1983 1. 2. 3. 4. re“arsUnrt:r:t%he°!“9i2 ^ee:rirper.»"rrat:r- January 19. 1983. curttruw - - - - Xh. City -ill asK for an underlying road and ucilir, «ase«e«r over the road outlot-bue -- - - - - - - - , The anolicant «ust execute a maintenance agreement to aseure t e upteSr^d -aintenance of the private road. 5.Payment of a park fee determined as follows: Lot 2 0 $200.00 Lot 3 0 $200.00 $400.00 wrr -c mh r-s ■ I . .‘V _ I OLB«w 6t«CryM mm 'V ■■'i tT!?3'-v Mr. Brent 432 Mldlai Minneapol notice of p Date of Mee Votes: Planning Gc _Ae X Af _ ae _ De —« Ta _ Ta NOTES AND £ division property be via Me Ski Tonka Highway E [71 *ppii< Appli< addit: nsstii for t] In all css. reguestsd or tha If tha app contact th if y®** they snd aPP^^ the wetland revised nal residential brought up to senent over ssure the mmfcvnii sm- JJSSSfcBo» 6f •CkysUl Bay. Minnaista 55323•Manidpal Oflicaa Taltphont 473*7357 -w K:q •Va*» > ':ai control No.X Variance /22 Mr. Brent W. Primus 432 Midland Bank Building Minneapolis, Mn. 55401 -2350 Conditional Uae Permit Subdivision# Preliminary Date of Notice Notice of planning commission action Date of Meeting _ Votes: 4 For February 7. 1983 D. Dunn & L. Yogerst 4740 Bayside Road Maple Plain, Mn. 55359 Against i:" .:'f ^ Planning Commission recommends tbe following: Approval: As submitted X Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted — Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicmt Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Oowlseion Study _ No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. filing of a lot line rearrangement sub- division with the City, creating a 49'238’ parcel to be combined with the roperty located at 4740 Bavside Road. 2. Access to the larger par^^j glialV be via McCulley Road. 3. Owner of property located at 4740 Baystd? Rgq<i Ski Tonka Inc, to quit claim deed 33* of right of way to Hennepin Ccunt Highway Department. I □Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission_ _ _ _ _- — Council _ _ _March 14, 1983 — Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent,upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the ,, masting is -- - - - - - - - - - -or - - -- - - - --- - - --- -— for the _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ meeting. In all casiis# the application must be continued with the stdsmittal of im^uestad information within ---------------------------------------——------------— City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. ths applicant has trouble obtaining additional information# please intact the Zoning Administrator desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review ^||*^^ppfOval by the Planning Commission. wm * I# Pic ij0c Fel- SUBJECT; Planning Cor Exhibits: Gaffron Hennaoir Buildinc Revised Oberhaui The Henneoir for the purr ing access t not feasible the Ring Roi east. The larger I The access 1 Director wi] I have been to some forr both parties lot. The Di additional ] Mrs. Dunn he property foi The surveyoi to the cente total lot ai relocated wi sketch there determined c approval. 1 ments. Plar combined wit 49' X 23 Gaffron (Exl • _ ^ C. 122ional Use Peirait ision, PraliJBlnary ee fogerst (oad In. 55359 iouncil meeting from applicant king Oonmission aneement sub- combined with the arger parcel shall 3 Bavstde Road and inepin County •ceipt of r:. iittal of rawn on» please ^mmission Minutes upon review • • TO:Plan!iinq Commission PROM:jeanno A. Mabusth, Zoninq Administrator DATE:February 3, 1983 SUBJECT: ^^723 3ki-'Ionka, Inc. 4740 Baysidc Road - Variance Planning Comaiissicn Action - To deny or approve subject to conditions Exhibits: A) 3) C) D) E) Gaffron memo Hennepin County Highway Deptartment letter 1/27/83 Building Envelope with 49'X218' of additional land Revised sketch Oberhauser letter 1-19-83 The Hennepin County Highway Department has reviewed the Dunn property for the puroose of*improving the existing access. They find the exist­ ing access the only acceptable one. To move the access further west is not feasible because it would place it too close to the intersection of the Ring Route a.nd CSAH 84. The topography prevents a safe access further east. The larger Primus lot will not be approved for direct access onto CSAH 84. The access to this property will be via the Ring Route. The Public Works Director will approve all new curb cuts. I have been advised that the applicant and the Dunns are attempting to come to some form of an agreement on the sale of additional land. I have advised both parties that until Council acts, we have no idea as to the size of that lot. The Dunnr have stated for the public record their desire to acquire additional land from Primus. .Mrs. Dunn has been kind enough to submit photographs and slides of her property for review at the meeting. The surveyor has submitted a revised sketch showing the property platted to the centerline. The Dunn property now has a depth of 193' with a total lot area of 42074 sf. or .96 acres. The improvements have been relocated within the lot lines but at a 1" = 200'scale with merely a sketch there is no accuracy. At our last meeting, Planning Commission determined a subdivision would be required as a condition of this variance approval. The survey required for the subdivision will certify all improv- ments. Planning Commission must now determine the size of the parcel to be combined with the Dunn lot. 49' X 218' Corridor along North Property Line. Gaffron (Exhibit A) confirms that this is adequate area to solve all future qeotic needs. Per Oberhauser letter (Exhibit E) will this corridor permit ^ *gnsion of the existing house? Please remember the substandard setback to the east will prevent expansion on the east. (50' req., 30* existing). There adequate area nr.w to permit expansion to the west and north on the (rear setback req. 100' - existing 140', side setback required 50'house iM ■ M iwr i existing 160 effect futur the 49' X 21 the proposed The lot woul ation of the envelope mea b) Addition The lot woul lots. The c the one acr€ building en^ other type c far as askii lot to the i of the Dunn If you choo history of legal subdi Additio The require ship requir deny that t of the curr STAFF RECOM To approve Inc. subjec with the Ci with the pr larger pare conditions in property id the exist- :ther west is lersection of i access further ;s onto CSAH 84, le Public Works ttenpting to come d. I have advised o the size of that sire to acquire lides of her erty platted * with a have been h merely a ning Commission :his variance ify all improv- he parcel to be solve all future corridor permit tandard setback 30* existing). and north on the ck required 50* m . V- mm m ■I - > S'I? m existing 160') . existing structure. The addition of effect future expansion plan^ “ a new house to be constructed on the 49* X 218' corridor will standars of the RR-IA Zoning District, the proposed lot meeting all sett , c ^ building envelope in consider- The lot would indeed have the west. The building ation of the severe slope ot. tne propurry envelope measures 130' X -12'. b) Addition of \_J}£1± The lot would now satisfy the minimum area requirement o^^^ ^ minimum lots. The applicant's attorney and^st.ffjtrongiy^^^^^ ^ the one acre addition. T ->^.:inuitG area for septic expansion and any other^typrof^impro^^ '"o^b-''set\sid4 for^thrsubsLnd^rd^ lot ll tS'east!"" Twoutf suggest tha^ we^limit this review to consideration of the Dunn lot. If you choose this ^,;/iot‘"and’'?hl fact thaJ^irwIs an^approvldhistory of the ownership or the lo legal subdivision in 1971. c) Addition of 4 acres , d. rifv's Dosition on lots of common owner-The requirement would uphold the Ci y P . District be upheld and fei^ ^t^^f^^e^nUufhifto^y o'f fhl ?“;^Lrany\^«^g in conlideration of the current status of the property. STAFF recommendation To approve the lot area and lire^rearrangement subdivision Inc. subject to the 4 acre parcll be combined with the City requiring 49 X , aavsid<=> Road and that access to the «c.u.y «o.a. h 4 Wnif. OT ' 'vi. Ml f p:- TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: This is < which wa large eni done c\z > indicatii required ’'multi-c( ling. I been fil exist on a mound < line sho strip 21 2410 (sei parcel wi I would size if Please n< north bo- road eas' are (226- width of Also, th< north fr< exists hi Assuming about 46 within e: orth will not addition of structed on A Zoning District, elope in consider— •he building rural residential lend at a minimum i more reasonable >ansion and any i attorney goes as the substandard Lew to consideration n on the unique was an approved f common owner- be upheld and n consideration n of Ski-Tonka ment subdivision be combined ccess to the i -•» m m m- m m- EXHIBIT d. TO; FROM; DATE; Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector January 17, 1983 SUBJECT; #722, 4740 Dayside Road, Brent Primus, Site Evaluation for Septic Systems This is an existing 1+ Acre Lot with existing house and septic system which was repaired in 1980. Testing was done to show that the lot is large enough to support all future septic system needs. Testing was done at a site with 10-15% slopes. Perc Rates averaged 27MPI. No indication of the presence or absence of mottling was given, as is required in the Orono Design Manual. The boring log does indicate "multi-colcred clay" at depth, which may or may not be mott­ ling. I was not able tc .vutain samples to peruse since the holes had been filled in. However, should a perched seasonal water table actually exist on the site at some time, the tested site would not be suitable for a mound due to the slope. In my opinion, flat land north of the property line should be added to the lot in an amount of at least 1/4 acre+. The strip 218' wide by 49' deep, continueing the rear lot line of parcel 2410 (see sketch) would be suitable. Adding land west of the existing parcel would be of little value for septic system due to slopes. I would further recommend that the lot be brought up to a 2.0 acre minimum size if possible, which is the standard for unsewered lots in Orono. Please note that according to the legal description on Dunn's deed, their north boundary is 226 feet from the center of the road subject to a 33 road easement, hence the actual existing lot dimensions for zoning purposes are (226-33) 193' X 218* (or 232'depending on what is taken as the actual width of the west 1/2 of the SWl/4 of the SWl/4) which is about .97 acre. Also, the legal description in the tax records for parcel 2440 goes 253' north from the center of the road, so a (253'-226') = 27' discrepancy exists betv;een parcels 2430 and 2440, as shown on sketch "A” attached. Assuming Dunn's deed description is correct, the existing north line is about 46* north of the barn, and I suspect that the existing system ^ within existing lot lines, but may not meet a 10' setback. C00£ Addresi 4^ ^ ^ ^ Standi □ Mouni Syv.emtvco □ other i'eimif Quildmg t\pe R V. !r> SEPTIC TANKS PrOiSer outlet ar i inlet Height of tank bottom i*b< D«AINFI c LD; Tcta'.'ii Total trea*incnt orea Is't. 1 I ype of filter martria^ t. Distance from nearest blrj Depth of fill over drain he /JI /*^ A rf * Bl luation septic system at the lot is Testing was 27MPI. No ven, as is s indicate not be mott- the holes had r table actually t be suitable for h of the property 1/4 acre4;. The ne of parcel f the existing slopes. a 2.0 acre minimum its in Orono. lunn's deed, their lubject to a 33' for zoning purposes :aken as the actual .s about .97 acre. *1 2440 goes 253' discrepancy i "A" attached. ig north line is 5ting system is :k. C006 Addreis ^ — J/i Standard ucnct^ □ Mound Sysiemivro □ Other Height Qf t4Hk bottom above v\3tcf t3bJe ■■■ ^ ^ C ITY OF ORONO DataConnected t jblPriC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal s««c. P,.p..,vi.D. Lagal Oascr'.ption-T3,c.iiivro u other -------------------------------------------------- ^ ^ ^ I'eimi, rjo. Oat. ol pe.nm k --'»77j 5 -/I «fea i»»t»lttrC.; ' * ^ ClerhaciaNo. Bedroonn SuiM.naupo fi.C::-.p^.Oc£r orGf’D Laundry Garbdfla Disposal SEPTIC TANKS ......... .'NE'.'Ci-.K.r .".•Ait . O E SUN^pacilv II /C'OCl------------21 E-CP.. OU-.IC,/NIK aiHIU.. Distanct to nearest bulldin# DRAINFI c LD: Total U-i gth lines ------Number of lines JLll-------- Total treatmem orea Is^,. f(oOO ^ - - Heisht of drainfield above water table ^ . .± Trench Aidth Type of filter masriai XSV*-------- Distance from nea.cst birJ; /-rLL'.iiS5^Vile size '»«------------- min/in Depth of fill over drain'icld /JizlSzl___0*Pth of rock over tile .undertila VVELLOATA 1 ) ^ca * i t5 T IJk y* ■^Ce V ?: 0 TJ •1 4C o .9 Eo oa V C :js c ■3a % <9 Lfi C E 3 1 a Si co :5 V. Q > C a (S . |V 5" >t‘rr r,Ar Fc& =1 .. 0<^ts . Ot^TteTi * * pv^r^' rvc'i -nf<' IN SP Tj: DATE COViPLIANCE PUMPOUT RECORD date gallons f-ixP. '^To^TION * sketch " •2 ^>>7i *pC o ____ S ',uOS7ANOARD *4 - 'riWr-OfironMING r . • Includa; tf Mell location 21 Diitence from house to tepitc tenlif. diet. boa. and dreinfteld ____ 3> North ecfcin> a^^d mart Bavsid ^ '.r IkS —na, 1-^ n^i : ■■ - •A: • I /Xr I ■i L / / y / i - 1 »• \ ^ j ^ X U. fc ^ •'i'* '■ ■ ' -jV- '^ • i s j « ,•.»•* ’A'I: ' .i ^"*" ' ■ ■ ■' >-i.v. .•' / i.\”; ‘^ ' 'J- ., ' *-r*' V,. < . Ti • ' . • , • 't > . ^ 1 • ‘ if / . .' •*\ ,1 ■' y ‘» ' ‘ tT K •<' ' f - '*• « ■*“. V'l . W'. ' •■'• ■'• *■ ' * — 5 I i ♦ ■'-«• If •« • • /—#•rv fT. *. W. ^i. •C »r » rii \tiy '■■^'V « Cn c «i • • •• •• •*#5- S Ci • • ••• W .«• V,* V < • %• ■i 'V > *• ♦ »• t.^ V ^«« • » • ►- - ^ .• CJ t . C w *♦, ^ «« '•r.^ ^ .r •<7 ^ i\ ♦♦J :: ’•• •% >. •:* « % # >••«%/£f> * %% •-y •"% » • »•. ^ *v w •••.' • • # .• '•» •• *r %• • •m • % « • ^. f ••H. ••• »«w J Z > C '••9^ ^ ^ t ■ ^ . ^ •n.^ "W ■H ® *• >* %j • • : ^■r. ^ - ■^ . *• •* ^ • *•^ •• «•.. •*•« % V. V* % - 9^ « m r c: -5 •- V ••• ^ •• ^£• s* r' V C 'V* ••>'•» % •c ; ••. * •»>* • * i:• * ¥^ s;* •ik' . : h j *• ?•C •\ 'T. ‘X .i % ' • c • • w «\ •■» -•• *•• * M %^ w •:-. <« 4 ••«»•w «•• •-C • ■ 'w*. •%»« A **•• •-•• •# •.• ••^ “ — V, f *- « •:• ^ T ^ - .•• w •• •* #••••• tj 99 • « *•'* Cj t- ^% ^*• . *■ •« /. •: ^*: . ;:: >. ;: C - - c »-••• u •* i... •. C- V 5 •u c:* >• •»- — r" >« w « 3 • ■'•• - ‘ •- .1 *5* . *.• • « • • • Z2• ^ ‘ ^ C* . • ^ w » V t# •- . i,. •s. ‘« — Z '* .*“•% fj V ■: < *K %: 9 . • .• « • ' * •» ..9-^ ^ :• “: •; ♦‘^, c ••• w i 1 ;r^ • *: *• • Cw %- V*• • -• • »* mm-i :U i?S: > M .^v J* . ' V I • r . » M i '4 ' A- » -. > -yv" ^t*. >■ K •■* >. I • ■ I it ‘ ^ ,1 . i 1 ^M w HENNEPIN Ms. Jeanne Zoning Adr City of Or P.O. Box € Crystal F< F2 Propos CS^H { rc-otic Hanne] r^vi© Minnesota propC'Eod acceptabl -For futu 7 feet 0 the cent 7ne prop -The prop The exis -To meet Lot 3f I •Because « will not '1 7^ access ' on Ring •Any new land us any cen i -All pro utility limited landscs * ’ I : ' f > ^ - ^ \'\ w • •« <T V " r.•• •. •• ■» «<• • »• •• .. • • ^ • »• . • • ■« •. >. •: c s^ ... » •• ^ • M • .« • • z — ^ r* Mm^ ^ t • « •. o ^ • r: , ^ i. w » I „ ' ^ i ' •■' ■ ■“'•* ■^■' UL‘ •■ J ' 4 ^'"A HENNEPIN exhibit mr •«1^...» •»• •C)EPAI?nv1ENT OF TRA^S^ORTA 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins Vtinncsota 5bo43 O'n!(m':U* ^.*r » \ l S >* January 27, 1933 FEB - 2 1583Ms. Jeanne llabusth Zoning A<3ri.nistrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Fay, Minnesota bbjzu Procosed Plat - "PriT3US Addition" , ^ , . CS\H 84 NE Quadrant of Ring Route Read ^McCauley) ''Option 31, Township 118» Range 23 Hennepin County Flat No. 1059 review and Recoturandations acc^t3ble with consideration of these ccnoitior^: ^ ^««-a ♦•n 84 the developer should dedicate an additional-For future iirproverents to Hqht of way 4C feet front7 feet of right of xvay along CSA.H 84, !rak.ng the rignt or w y the center of CSAH 84. r T^*. 1 mrcic 1 ru^t be located at the existing access.-The proposed access for Tot 1, BlocK i nu.c oe j.ut.a s ^ 0 niock 1 must be located near the west lot line. exiSiS fSld entrance is an acceptable location for lot 2 access. -T» nest the minteem sight distance re<rai recants at enrve the access for Lot 3r Block 1 Trust be located as far east as possibly . , V. ’ T1 r\r^ A A psst of Ring Route Roc«ti, HeiJiepin <«o*antyof the severe hill on CoAri 84 eaot of i g reviewed IVlcSS'li acceptable location on Ring Route Road. -Any new access to a County ^ad, ^trance"^r^^ begSningS*^;sir "^sX!sni:.»rss:=r.n.u -All proposed construction within Ccunty right of HENNEPIN COUNTY . 'MM Ns. dear January -The dev€ County I Please dj Sincereli James N. Chief, P] _ _ _ _ 5 - 2 IS83 lounty review of and found it an additional feet front isting access. west lot line, access. access for [ennepin County ;e reviewed )le location or a chains in sfore beginning foma. n dpptowed but is not t, and INTY m ETM 4 ■■■■2 ill Ns. Jeanne Nabusth 2 January 27, 1983-The develcper ir.ust restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. — Please direct any response or questions to l^s Weigelt Sincerely James N. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Progransning JK%ymV;pl ■y>'; . j rv’-/mf:. ■ ■ ■■ , .V on vithin ■:mg wm -fi' Hi -.'Y- *!? '-■■•A ip^ ■A (i-v lf M ' -;im \.y >» I »> ••ii ^ ■ ■ '^- V . > v'? 0 pm; M:. f-. VARIAMC6 EXHVSketch Por Primes R ropertv ' PARCEt 2440 JAM. 4,158a Rjfe.vts(.o* Jma '*?», \>M REV. -JAM. 2EJ883 --LHJtE line Pueuc traju 520'2 I I I I *v.f ' \ . V o^ >'• \ > \ tS .X »>4 « / t «4 .> Al.TEAMA.TE '. OKA iMPIEuO t»»vr. • • 'A / iO%a- 1 IP. Q^oA •CO.RO. Pt^gX- TtS't LOCAKTIOM^ . V.o<ACrtoi>4*) ALSO ^o«.im€« LotATlOM. Jgd ^ ■« rfJVO Bi**» *A'^9* *** * I'* s 200 V ariamce Sketch fbn Primos pKopemv Parcel 2440 JAN. 4,1383 atvisto: EXHIBIT - . • JAN.26i,l983 / • ' -LiKE LINE PtiaUC TRAIL(VT 5i6'± 7 \ \ 1J, ‘ 1 V ' * V • S % f ■'•■'•, V- L • * • • ^«A > • ' - - ' *A 5- ■ ••■"■■% %*• . 5.*^^ '^cw_ >,. : M \ ,\v- '2 % • •• % « m lO ^ ^ ^ •■ :- a', ^o- ■ '■>'. ; • <• •■■. ' ^ ^ )[ *.. <’Mf . . ’V* • ■ A. A ;S^ • •'. • ■’’j • • . ^ • . - ^ >, • • • ' ^ ^ MT^ • 0 ' »( t*ivr. 4tT£ANA.Tt \ D raihFU u D /I <f 'I „ Vd#M *• 2I»'*A» /■ ■•y > » Pkl»x.. TtS'V Loc«E*TlOi^4S HoTt.*. Lo<4crioi4*| i< f<H0 N >•90>«»10 !«• B«»d B«Mna«iH». t«N M3)T I'*» 200*□ O NfcU.L I iyC5 IAVE5 N C.RAT • Ov’ f. J. C Df.R ’•OB t *' T K ran ,L>H% v» T o v". R R T L> :>C H u N .lanuarv City ol ?.0'. Bt Crvijta! Re: D. O' Gent le' Based danuar two ma opport reside is sir of sul To ac prope to ch Since previ stand not I acre? bullc If w crea ing prop mKkEXHIBITGRATHWOL. OBERHAUSER & RANDALL. LTD. attorneys AhtO counselors mt law . ^ I ii-ri £ O NEILL I GRATHWOL 1905 1421 E WAVZATA POUl EVARU • VVAYZATA MINNESOTA 5539 I i612» 475.2401 N C.RATtnVCL i OL* f. J. C Ol.RM AUSE.^f »50B£ T K RANDAL u .OHS V. Hjr \qRICKSOS. J’^ PMO'Hvc* GRA^•^^^OL J R T »J H iJ SAAts January 19» I9i?3 JAN 2 I ' City of Orono P.o’. Pox 66 _ Crystal Bay. Minnesota 353^3 Re: David M. Dunn Our File 7‘*61-1 Gentlemen: Bnsed upon the discussion that -curred In ^1^00^ danuaty 17. 19S3, I would like to two major concerns:KJ L V. w - - cci ^n nrea to allow them the 1. That the size iestdencrand/or rebuilding the existing opportunltv of ,-xpandlng the existing residence in case it becomes necessary.n v-ci&c: -- - - - - 2. That the location of ia sufficient room on the property to provide for the of subject waste.o£ subject wasut-. ^rusTo'i;crea:"rh: ‘,Lf o^riorroro :cre;“hi:;'corre:ponds to the zoning across Baysidc Road.to the zoning ai-iv.o=. - - Since there is approximately '!;''"‘y ®"“^"„o'’exlstlng'lots’up to the^two acre rnrd^-1" "baia^rrf i*::o;:r:rsiicrhr^ rcUlnio fif"L"cres':"r ^ntf'tentren a:res would only allow three additional building unitsbuiia^ng ui.xw.^. If mv client Is unable to purchase the for grant- lleate a two acre parcel. I would ^^^SSest tha sufficient amount of - - properties to create a parcel proper!/ Glt.y of i .1 a unary i’age 2 when cor should !: •A true tic the Duni LOUS B. LBO:vl cc: Mr. IBIT B «612> 475-2401 1963 np CoTTiitissioti on on. Mv client lins ) allow them the ling the existing such that there on-site treatment sufficient amount ot cres whichcorresponds eluding the two to the two acre existing lots* would petty, since five w three additional he Primuses to condition for grant- flcient amount of to create a parcel City of Orono . f a uua r y 19, 19 5 Page 2 when combined with the Dunn’s lot of at least two acres. The appvonriate easements should be obtained bs the City over the set aside property to allow for the con­ struction of drain fields as necessary to maintain an operative septic system for the Dunn's property. If you have any rjuestious, please let me know Sincerely, LOUIS B. OBERHAUSER LBO:vl cc: Mr. David Dunn Zoning Applic The ap seatin The pr or tak use pe avails iatc easements or tho con- c svston for TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Tom Jacobs, Building Official February 2, 1983 SUBJECT: #725 D'Vinci's 3420 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit List of Exhibits A. Property Owners List B. Plat Map C. Survey D. Elevation Plan AppiiIa?io“-°Exp;?;sion of Conditional Use Permit Restaurant Class II Auuxiuauxtjii --••c- - , a otv*^*^* d0olc for 3xtsrior The proposed expansion “^^"^eauire^on^throriginarconditiona or take fILitionai parking for the expansion is :v:i?IbTrii^^runicipal parking lot to the rear. Wy:. Bob Sk 34 2j3—6hor<a Wayzata, m ^OTI€^ OP PI Oafb of Meef Votes: 4 Plaiuning Com NOTES AND SPJ the Plannir the propert No J your propos municipal p deals with building el Tom Jacobs ^ Applicar Applican addition meeting for the 2n all cases« requested inf or the City w If the applic contact the Z If you desix they are ava and approval r*' jse Permit t Class II : for exterior issification t il conditional mansion is 4 n ;r5 -Y Bay, MianMoto Sfi323«Muiud|ml OfficwTtlephoM 473-7357 Control No.22^ ■A m t i 1. Bob Skinner ,342 ^^ji^^oreline Drive ►Wayzata, Mn. 55391 VarianceConditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary 1 : Date of Notice •NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Dafe of MeeClng 2-7-83 Votes: 4 For Against Planning Conunission recommends the following: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Cononission study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Please submit the following by March 1, 1983 for the Planning Conunission meeting of 3-21—83; 1, Application signed by you and the property owner, Mr. Ecklund. 2, A letter from Mr. Ecklund in support of your proposal. 3. A revised site plan (use 1” = 30' scale), access drive to municipal parking lot. I have enclosed a section of the zoning code that deals with required parking stalls, etc. You may wish to submit a revised i.SlSVAttlQn foe_this review. I would ynn f-r^tinh haco Tom Jacobs on the structural design of the patio deck. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission March 21, 1983 Council □Applicant' 8 next scheduled meeting is dependent .upon receipt of additional information* Deadline for the meeting is _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _: or ^or the_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _meeti^l^^ ~ ^ In all cases, the application roust be continued with the submittal of requested information within or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the 2Soning Administrator. v*. ft (I ■ ‘ t.'- i If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review and approval by the Planning Commission. » - T' ^:7. ■•V. ' TO: FROM: DATE: P] Tc F€ SUBJECT: #1 Exhibits: A) Propert 3) Plat Ma C) Survey Zoning Dist Required fr Proposed fr Variance The applica front yard. The applica property li Locat on pr The p lakes! locat' the 1 23.12 Staff recomi that 1 2) that 1 250' c 3) the si door i No oth 725ince.tional Uae Permit .vision. Preliminary ice Qouncil meeting from applicant ning Oonmission 4 r March 1, 1983 for m signed by you and :lund in support of i) , access drive to >ning code that submit a revised ceipt of n, please nmisalon Minutes ipon review . V - ■. Vt* * '■ ^ 1 ■ ■ ■ o- m M Planning Commission Tom Jacobs, Building Official February 3, 1983 SUBJECT: #728 Gabriel Jabbour Exhibits; - Front Yard Setback Variance Property Owner's list. Plat Map Survey Zoning District LR-IB (34.401) Required front set back 35* (34.452) Proposed front setback 26 * Variance (9ft) 25.71% The applicant is proposing to construct a 24X24 storage building in his front yard. The applicant is requesting to locate the structure 26’ from his front property line on Tonkawa because of the following hardships; 1) Location of the structure will interfere with mature trees on property if located at another site. The proposed structure is located more than 250’ from the lakeshore and will not cause a hard cover problem, if located within 250’ you would add 576’ of hardcover to the 18.47% existing hardcover which will bring it up to 23.12% total hardcover. Staff recommends approval based on the following findings: that the proposed location will not destroy any mature trees 2) that the location would not increase hardcover winhin the 75’ to 250’ area 3) the structure does not create a traffic visibility and the door faces away from Tonkrvwa 4) No other variances ariy n^'tded. ^PPPjjjppiPi *mam •' J. rr ii .|ii||||MBK ice )uilding in his from his front .ps: *e trees om the if iver to ip to ure trees, in the 75' to and the i'i. * o"' **or 0 J-'.vcv.r in l-j, '-'ir- I • EXHIBIT urv-*; . I JioroLv corti th • t i hir. ir. 'j and cTrort t.it p, r.f a £,urv''.’y of iWj Vv.15, ’Tarten'n nt Mrrt .’4vl;-1 thnt purl Ihnr'io'’ Ivin.* ~mi*.'.0'istorly r" i il;io, ind itr. ox'^'fr.r i/r>, : ;c as c-o cTpr.ri n/ nt t'-> :1 . lot; ‘hcvct? *iort!. •rlv 'i’.o'i,: 'd.*'! ” r.t'u'ly lir » of ijMi.fl loi. a diutbroo of 1?4.? tn *?m> • o, '* nrirr of lino to f.o doscrlb'?'!; th«nco df^flortin.*; to tho loft 9 df'pr^s 45 cdnutcs to th** r.horo of StuhtM flay, ano fnero tormJnotlrii;, and th« locution of ull exlstir.4; buildlnro thor#*op. Tt dooa not nurport to : bov cth»}r i r.orrvr-r.or.ta or or.crf/och- nonto. > 1” = 50* ll-??-76 Tror jwrkor %Tu(ilrli»l 1/indrfcirlf Cof'Jn ilof7T?cVtfrV>4Gordon I«r»nd fJurvoyor i»ncl Planner liOnfT Lako, Mnnooo'!^ #728 i i4 4 Vi Mr. Gabr: 780 Tonk< Long Lake NOTICE OF I Date of Mee Votes: 4 Planning Co X Ap AP Ap: Dej Tal Tal No NOTES AND SJ I Applica, [Applieai additioi naating for tha Zn all caaaa. requeatad ini or tha City % If the applic contact the 2 If you dasii they are avc and approval I». ••• • $ i • L * • •IrMf-n r.r •i X?j , rxco^t * ui •i •;.*T '' ■'* rr. iri • r.Vvrl;- llr-^i ••,*'’nrirr of ;tU>bn fiiy, ,rt: b:1ldlr;:8 I ri o*.ri>»Brh' r.r/,4 ir .' >■ ■ i vx^ -----------------------^ I i'i % Tcbphon* 479.7357 VarianceMr* Gabriel Jabbour 780 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, N. 55356 Oonditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Date of notice 2-»8~8 3 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting _ Votes: 4 por February 7. 1Q«l Against • m* Planping Oommission recommends the follotring: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information requirad before Council meetina . Denials For reasons noted - ' Pending receipt of additional information from applicant . Tabled, Pending review by others, or further Planning Study . No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: 4'lanning Commission Council ^pllcanfe next scheduled meeting is dependent .upon race * ti ^"i^ in^o«nation. Deadline for the ______________ «»*- - * meting.- - - - - - - - In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _su«axtraj, or or the City will consider the application as foraally withdrawn. If you desire certified copies of the official they are «v»ilable from the Building and Zoning Secretary ^rrevi^"“‘*“ and approval by the Planning Commission. ^ P° RSIS 'C« tM >* •! M*« *>«•« i.»ic Itvt i »•<» »tt.«x t t«« >M« IMtC »f m»a »• Mill M tl *1 Mi« ■* m» tuit n*ie nf •• ttu* WOM • H’t* *»M4> WSM * »«•* M« ?« « MM » *1 Mil l«M« IHIK M • t4T| itMl Mn CMi m mmQ * wit* I MMMUn w Mm un I »»•• t MM* li INUMt *1 •*« M*n UMi W*t l?«n UM tM* tt iNttT.n *1 Hti *MM •tM* WMt c* tt* »:• «* wjtt « 4t» IM S at‘a tt MOMII «M|t I M *1 (I*} ■ MM •• ■ •not* ftUUM it u ••—'*o •■ itwM* Mtn »«• MMUHt m McMiat Ml HIM *n uottm M it-iit-n •» cna >1* tim C|tl » MOM Citl Of «*!<• ■ ••MM MMfM Ml Ml MKI » •*-tlt-|| U t*M ■ •Ml SMMti.t>« m ■I* UMtt ■«*«•■? IMM11** »>•*» Mint M t«*M»*H TM ••*■ • • ••« M* Ml MM« Mt tMM #725 'I-'■'} ((./-' ;/l //O .-t MN. 4. It«>,' m*ma mu t& imj^*1 k*u*T ..tir.R* -V_" . «•. • .V Il^ , ^ I t- IftiMiSf'- r-' I fe,:. . f«i •fT i |s» isl , o p *4'!«i!i; (s I ■!5*5\'iH :’«s 5l53 s ?*= 3 ■P ) 'CT ' # ,.x/