The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-20-1984 Planning PacketPIANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 1984 7:30 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS r r Council Representative - Tim Adams Scheduled Public Hearings 1. 7:30 p.m. #849 I.D. Caples, Vacation of a portion of Park Avenue 2. 7:45 p.m.#853 Doug Klint, Tom Bernier and Gary Barr, 3535 & 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road Preliminary Subdivision Action Items 3. #845 Alan McDowell, 905 Ferndale Road West Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 4. #846 Leekley's Inc., 2450 & 2500 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 5. #847 Catharine Cram, 3760 Watertown Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 6. #848 Lowell Zitzloff, 3542 Shoreline Drive Variance - Public Hearing 7. #850 Dennis Thompson, 250 Old Crystal Bay Road Conditional Use Permit & Variance - Public Hearing 8. #851 Richard Stueland and Ramona Barbeau, 4080 Bayside Road Variance - Public Hearing 9. #852 William Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 10. #854 Robert Johnson, 1981 Fagerness Point Road Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Sketch Plan Review 11. #855 Choice Wood Company, 2500 Kelly Avenue Subdivision ~ Sketch Plan Review Additional Items 12. Planning Commission approval of July 16, 1984 minutes. 13. Planning Commission to select representative to attend the September 10, 1984, Council meeting. Adjournment TO; FROM: DATE: SUDJB List Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib This j with ’ Per t recom addit total The P desig Staff Coord will !T0:Planning Commission FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant 'Soning Administrator DATE:August 9, 1984 SUBJECT: #849 I.D. Caples, Park Avenue - Vacation List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Legal Description of Portion to be Vacated Planning Commission Minutes 7-16'84 This is an application to vacate a portion of Park Avenue in conjunction with variance application #783r in order to create a building site. Per the minutes of July 16# 1984# Planning Commission voted to recommend conceptual ^approval of the lot area and width variance upon addition of property obtained via the vacation of Park Avenue# for a total lot area of 18#285 sf. The Public Works Coordinator has been asked to review the need to designate utility and drainage easements to the City. Staff recommends approval subject to review by the Public Works Coordinator and subject to review by the City Engineer. This vacation will not landlock any properties in the area. m mmi: ^4 t i LV’ It i f ^ y • ■4: GENERAL LAN PROPERTY LO Site Ad Propert Please (for C< Please survey APPLICANT Name _ Mailin OWNER Name Mailir - Date I FEES - Coi Other App \ (trator i i conjunction llding site, on voted to ariance upon Lvenue« for a the need to Public Works !his vacation tMS: OWNER ,• y^-J CITY OP ORONO GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATION C5 C PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Humber (P.I.D.) 07-117-23-32-0013 Please check one — Is the property X_ abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone Mailing Address p. n. Box 0«seo Minnfsnta S5362 Marne i n. Canlep Virginia A. Caples Phone A20-5Q^ Mailing Address p- o. Box <3)4- Osseo. Minnesota 55369 - Date Property Acquired August I tatffi) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - Conditional Use Permits j Residential Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) J, S-; .mwi $150.00 e) Coiranercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Ap^ications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule mm 1983 (month/year) (over) torrens? led on required .. •.v-i; ' ..-■ ' ;JLm*.* mI 7/-3 7 - rn-aa - ^4iSo /lutxt - 7 -//•/' as - 3au - 60 0^ tfz ^3 {mJUU^ fijtyJ 7- //7~ a.3 - 3A- oo/y' >. </7 3 7 7-3 - 3A ' aoo^ 0>\JStL&^ z TI m/? •• • ■ ♦♦ <• •*' w ’ ’r. . ; \-ir Tis.i'r<i:::>*z. r^4n ■M—g ■a, . ’j|p; " * I 7— //7-H3 —AS - Co/9 'Si'/Jor 4*»jl Afli7“ t 1 - itn - SL3 f ^7^0 F~ T-z/T-a.S'AS - oo/^ £l lU > o 10 O M ^ a _ ^ < fO I ^ Ui €Mriii 3:I CM r* to fi UJ I4 s?55o -> - S M 5 e o> S u 22 ^ O IM UJ V * o o Ijouu I ly ly CM MM in > > in tt tt •X M M M> *4 < <cn o li. u. 5S O <^ 22 a7*5 ^82: ^ 3s-*»s a9 ?? _ M Ui CL UJ ao cr a.iM J « .m- - V;:1! .-1 i Z-. \u i-l *1 ■ >n i s • Ulo o I lua S 10 s p ss z COM tt Ul SiUJ SPsK* Os zs Ul i tos J O M O M Ills* •*-*««« e lu ui *4 O ^ u p ** o ^ 5 S ro 2S__ ^ o Ul ui 5 K O CJ u Hu 5 I 2 2 o S€M M M U *• •^ «»> > *^2g5g» ^ ^ ^CO o 1^ Ik o O *4 2S 5 I Ch o ^ =i _ !« OS in 7 x2SiSgSgS* N a B lA 5© 2 ^ 5 ^•o o 10 U. ri ^ Z UJ a 2 Q.m J J > ;iX"- Vv«:‘-'S-r:vS^*j!| |5: r', ■: 10 CM fO eg 10 S>- sUl Ul = l§;5J 3 o ^ go _ CU o X M H M ^5 5 ^ a t < CO O 10 O M X 10 S2 M Ul f^ ki2 Meg M H -J ^ CO < 2 iu a 3 & K Ul CO .J eg I N5gS52 T 3«22| ® *0 JU O M ^ K -J Kl o N << 3 gi O o 10 a CO «J eM < ^M < K K CO <2 p Ul tt ^ a ^ Ul H M ^ OT OT M M N M Ul Ul *< 10 < < Ul S K ^ CO^ S 3 5 ®^ ^ ^ -i© CLfo o -J X eo X I-Z Ul tt o 8 a Ul ttm J < tt M CO N u. Ul u. M fO eg fl s I u. u. M M «i Ul U X lU ^z ^ < ro -c 10 lO in MUIg £ eo CO p o 3Ul UJ ^ CO eg UJ CO eg K -J Z CO Ulu CO eg I N a:S3< Ul UJ tt 3 O CO ^ ao X CO ^ I U CO M W O M K- -J lO O ^ CO tt -• CO eg CO eg I Ul UJz CO CO 10 10 S S5s2 3 ift ^ ^fl o CU O X l-l H M X^ a5 CO o CO o eg X Ul ttomf UJa w a os iSi M O«U O UJ “g UJ ttz g) CO lO lO I i!‘ = 5 o 10 z UJ o aH Ck z 22 — S o o CO O 3 3 U X CO Ul tt u eg CO CO eg I N a < Ul M CO 10 10 I eoCO MQ p ^ Z tt *4 3S”i w •• o oH Ul CO K O 10 •0 eg tt eg o o Ul ‘’g tto siEiip^ t ^ ^ CO 10 C fg -i -J1 -i -J 9 M M tt < cy os J o H M |3 L ~2 Sl CO M c- upg C-» U ^ > 10 M 3 CO CO ^ M tt Ul lAVSg!;5« O Q tt <ri-ii O to Z Z ' o JO 3 10 z •• J lA o g ly ttCO O o -J ^ O l^geg O Ul ®g »S|§ 2|g§ CO eg CO 10 lO u» tt i >• < O If4 ly Ul «J P H H . Wf4 _ S ^ M A O > -c X >• “85 i*sf ^ tt < Ul a Ul tt Xli|i J J J ....................................'■ '■■••'•ii •5 Cc,M*‘v.ij imtc oT i^wrvQ'j i’or J, U. C.*;|)lo:: iri I>n.;.. V I- , !*i:..ck j-, 5*sr-cuj:;l o- ».ic.;L’.r.-;'n Prirk i ic: i li.j;;j i, C ty, Kj r.ne:. o txi i@llDW[i 1.1: r-I hor-ji;.’ cor: 5:";, a tri.y iriO rcrrot t ro::rocor;t'.>^ior, o"' o ri::v«'.y cf 9 of t: -’.ov.r.ji.* • r n '**'* * ^ V *.«.ot 10 nnd th'it pirt v«.* «A»’ %*9 L.vir.j* i!ort>.v.ortorl.:>o' j i.i,r.-- rjr.r.ir:;* fro:-.a r.cinL •on the Vort!j'=xjetorJ..v I’JTM g!fiiri 9 dittant Iv ■‘•: r V Kort’.vc'i-t iiv1.y * Tc:r. tl o .J::r?U;;i;; cc : :j. r cT c::id TiOt 9 to ti e :'.ost 3ontl..:rly corr.c:r ci" raii Lot 9, all ir Plock 3, ’’Poixcuist L f.icklro'o'.*5 Park, l^or.n'i'vir. 'Jo. ’’..•;r;d the location of all cxi.st.vn{' luiloliiiji-, 3'' eny th^rccn. It door r.c? ’ i;r;ort to ct:o’« othor l:nr)r(>v«”:ontr: or on'^rc' oh' -int: , CCHDO:; R. COFFIN CQ^ !MC Scale: Date : o : 1" = 40 ’ C-26-H3 Iron raaricer Cordon K. Coffin %V. 6(/;4 Koric S. Gronberg Re,;. Land Sui-zeyorc and Planriwrc Long Lake, Minnesota • .• i.*- *: *v . ^h'.t t’.l.Ic r*ert f4 •«V'"Vi* •• ^4 Ci J • • *1 »• •• »AJ %» / L.* .1 • .1 i.ir.- inx. f.r fi o.' fiin I K('rt’.voi=t- ^ • • •^ ^ * n * 1* <m m w' • • JL cT r-lid . I-.i:.r *‘..iricl •. • ' u» i • l »i V# 6(/;4 GORDON R. COFFIN LAND •URVKVON AMO PLANNM aeti WATBUTOWN ROAD LONR LAKt. MINN. RRaM 47a<4l41 7-24^84 Dtteriptions for I. D* Capltt Bsrtqul0t * VlekluiidU Hrk Htiwpla Counlgrt HiAMSotA Itortion of road to U vacattd ^ ^ ^ 4. ,4.. wti of rArk mvM lyiBg l»*t of tho Woot U^of lorUivt«t«rly of o lino dmim ft<o» th* ““J oemr of L»t oold Block 3, point on the Bortboastorlj lino of fold Ut 9 S f»»t BorthwUpljr tnm th» L»t 9. all 1b * WaklBBdU Park, aMBaplB Co« Minn". gf^.r.i:rir5*?^ra that ,«i .f p^ lying Boot of tho Moot lino of lot 10, Block 3t nnd ito Itorthorly oxUniion, nnd lying Bortkoontorly of o lino dmvn fro* tho noot Southorly eemor of 1^^^» ^ Block 3, Bcrthonotorly through n point on tho R^bMst- orly lino of nnid lot 9 diotnnt 15 foot Borthwoitorly fton tho Bnotorlj comor of onid . "Btrgy*!0^*VicU.und*o ftupk, Honnopin Co# Minn #849 '¥■* ^ X 1 m- r-'T r.‘. /flMOTES OP TB #783 I.D. CAl 4798 MORTB SI variance #827 C.D. 1932 FAG] VARIANCE 4; K>." :'-vU_____-j mvvttuG held JULY 16# 198^ MimJTES OP THE PLANHIHG COMMISSION PAGE 8 ;;;; j*.iJSS .>»». variance I D CapXes and Ann that thH^was ZOTin? Administrator planning Coiraission J>:^tfng“to fxtow\h^^ppUcant time to acguxre more land.X&nd • tVifi “iw «..«p» rrir,“UTisnKrp'.si'.; vaSn of park Avenue^caples available and rubfeft'ro%h°e following conditions: rTo Jer variances are granted for this applicant __ _ _.<,1 vacation of Pari Ko c<T.net vcii.*.*- - - vacatiw»» -- Z\lJ^^rllTloTl.sr.llt a'^rithe^larerhrre ordinances.ordinances. .. pu p..a~..p .-“>■> “ •>■““ “ ”building envelope.buiiaing cuv^*v,tp^. 5. Approval.is baaed on the partial Avenue with a lot pp.. „=..p.p. »»«»" «•• “’■Sime seconaea. Minority Opinion - Callahan voted nay . a S^t!fero!^^t^V^rs? lot is stiU too sinall. §827 C.D. WILLIAMS 1;32 EAGERNESS POINT RD VARIANCE ucci stsint Zoning C.D. Williams was P'®®®^ PlanningAdministrator Gaffron stat asked ;k\U»?.p" ~ p"»«•"•«>“ »>“ ~ hardcover.hardcover. 5riinigrp«*ble'i?tlth\^rne\Vh^ “ was resolved. Zonin< Appli List Exhil Exhil Exhi< Exhi This pros 303< int< 354! All wid enc div nev api th< Th< ut wo be Ar Cj t£ 1< S f -uMiu. 14.PAGB 8 were present d that this was ihing Commission to acquire more ,er lots in the )t is larger with ue proval to Caples with the partial .s larger than the is available ana ons: >r this applicant vacation of Park ,o effect when the on survey along with 1 vacation of Park 85 sf or .41 acre. Nays (!)• ly. Callahan felt L5* of depth with a is lot is still too sistant Zoning Planning Commis- 4, 1984 and asked tr plan to reduce rVand^sked'if'this FROM: DATE: :rr rr:— August 9f 1984 SUBJECT: ' V 1: 3545 ivy Place - Lot Line#853 Douglas Klint, Rearrangement • t LR-IC 1/2 minimum, riparian existing homes. list of Exhibits Inhibit 0 - survey S proposal application is^a 3545 ivy Place. -- - inrenaw - 3545 ivy Place. ^qq, ninimuro lot All three lots the LR-IC zoning ^ result of this width requiremenst o . fexisting nlace a house on the encroachments woul . _j.^ances would be neede P ^,^(jicates that division. , hardcover calculation new site.^ could ep^^^ allowances. approximately * ,^4 4-hout exceeding har75-250- zone without ______ ^thV 75--250* zone without ex^o a ^ review the drainage and ,he public works coordinator h« JAdU^siV^*" h^t'a roild%p%“aT- n{t -re^^tToc^Uoris^e^-essary to bear this out better definition Coordinator and;S:«“er de^rnition of the exacr Coordinator and , -i/irir*ess©d by tbG PubXx ua.e«.rif—wav shouXd bfi An additional issue to be ^^j^^^nnal ^"%jject Klint's proposed fa^en'K KXi^Vs^ot. If so. how will it lot? . . .w., . the subdivision subject to th Staff would recommend approva following: • -- - - luxu - and sewer city over same.to be granted to ciry . . .. • _ _ ^ Mt to be granted to city additional Ivy , City Engineer to determine need for any line right-of-way.rzr:;-...™ for Klint lot. ■kl 1 V ’•IV; 'W*-- CITY OP ORC SOBDIVISIOl APPLICANT 1 I PROPERTY 1 OVINER I PROPERTY L4 EXISTING L; Number Develc Presen Presen PROPOSAL @[i0\ m u JUL26G CITY OF Of nistrator Line width minimum e new riparian rights for two vacationr and ic g Barr Property at 15 ivy Place, and is r Douglas Klint at [id 100*rict. NO setback , as a result of this place a house on the ion indicates that I on the Klint lot m allowances. lew the drainage and City utility lines uilding site but a sry to bear this out. orks coordinator and aht-of-way should be ect Klinfs proposed Lsion subject to the tly the existing water iptions for easewen or any additional Ivy nnection charges (V;.m 1- ■^X ■ .% mi tj CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec'd ^ •LCoT" ByFee d ^ APPLICANT Name PROPERTY Name OWNER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Telephone Mailing Address /yj* JXy\Un^ Cahjl . )0)h, sTITW? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Telephone _ _ _ _ _ _ Mailing Address __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels ji_ _ _ bevelcpment Size A ^_ _Acres Dry Land ——• _ Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels */ Present Use (check) \i»^CAn\-lAncL Residential; no. of units _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District Z, /(L PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:a Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Propose d Use: (check) JU.26B64 Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per ^ Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ CITY OP ORC SDBDIVISIO) APPLICAHT ^ PROPERTY OWNER y ( PROPERTY LO EXISTING LA Number Develop: Present Present PROPOSAL -. liUM JUL26SU I CITY OF ORO ©Ittl CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec'd ^ #853 APPLICANT Name T\u/aIa1 Ji /Telephone PROPERTY Name OWNER Address iHS" C ahjl ^ Sa/asl ____________________ Telephone Mailing Address ________________ (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address _Pju<^ Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels ^ ^ Development Size a i Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) VAC amh/A/iat. Residential; no. of units __ _ _ _ __ Other (specify) Present Zoning District •i-,' PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per ^ Acres Minimum Lot Size:Square Feet Dry Buildable Land JElXfififififid Use: (check) K '■y ' m i.v A.; ■:^y \k V WM MINIMUM MAT 1. Applica 2. Prelimi 3. Certifi obtaine< Center 4. Stamped above 1 Certificati complete. Zoning Offi MINIMUM MAT 1. Payment 2. Signed 3. Title o 4. Easemen 5. Develop Certificati Zoning Offi FEES Applicant he or requestec Commission t to pay all Applicant's Owner's Sig Applicant m Planning Cor Monday of e Rec*d -7— ^4— ^ec'd '6 V2r-Jvo/ le Lication ;els mits ling sites) Acres Dry Buildable fy) . *■»«» •■ f t.• 4s: V ri- - H •S i m ^’:M:v • ? /. % S. vn .. m ^ :v4^ ■i V! - -;i:^ -4«;.iSiiiif^ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. 3. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4 . Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park ^ees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$100.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $240.00 plus 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $100.00* Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature _ _ DatehDate Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 da]^‘before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.w I *.IK' Ki M S lU lii to O ^ ^ CM p 111 UJ rlSgS o < ^ «9 K) O G fo o 1 n 4 * V T B!s.s: TION this list can be A-603 Government the names on the Application is te lOH assessments) plat. ion is complete, te $100.00 $250.00 $240.00 plus 20.00/lot $100.00* ormation required ttorneyr Planning nd further agrees ite I • &te 5 da^^'before the e held on the third « « • IV III * ^ M $ & w u & Si r.oiiifS'" CM o lu lAj a ASSSez ^ Z Z lA N 09 K) O O O ^ P m S lA . lA K < lU lU O Z *4 U M M U Z 7 55S< 8«23“S e (8 CD S >> S 8 ae K m al R“ Sg M m S mM is. Z M lA 88 cdSSI 9) M S3|-8* ~S*"8oJ5P «• > Ch ^ 88 < » < MX 88! lAl ^ >• N a CM Kl CM I N I O CM P Kl CM lA CM IN O CM Pto a V-*r| Ui lU go 23 lU lAJ I- H P P ^ ^ aUJ UI M M < GL CL H ^ 3 3 A P CM PPP P P Ui UJ Si -> -> z o S“.4 §S e; M K p o ^ CM U 4* flSS^ u•4 UJ So£ CM UI 88^ “8 M P M O Z -•‘'5O e N a M >• u 8 S n a. iu S IciiM CD CVi o oc O CM 5l p p Ui P P CL mJ u CM Q ^ ^ N ^ & CL ZP t _ CM O >• - CM ass -4 N UI >- CM < Z P Z CM P CM I P CM UI UI UI UJ lA P Sf ■» S§.§g Z CM a UI a 11^ EXHIBIT CM •Ja UI UI p a p p CM p P p p UI p ^ M P P I P < - P • ^ UI I Z O UI CM P -> P Z p P P p p H P P P U 23,-,ag a M H H > SliiS p p p p p pii^E I S p p 2 S o n S sh% s ao E i *T‘i '* , ;J ‘‘ <*;*=cfCOC-'1 a> SSE Kt O UJ ♦‘ft “fi N <S'ifls* • ® ® u»T i^ 8 M M IS S Sg M 1^ 9 K) O < CM U H I V) lAl ^ ^ — ^ U Z I e CM O O X CO K) K» p i§2 ssi ITnll ozr~)0I984ocxo Wj 11- o 'inn >— -Jj o M -^2 CM e HI HI s HI III lA S2 y.3§ s^iiissgI o co^S^Sg HI O O O ftC HI M ^ U< HI O C ? |j{ K H ^ U W M Q • M M _ _ O M ly U H « rA iu lu M < HI o -J -J HI 3 ~893y.i3 CO HI u O Q jS HI O UlliJ HI 3 HI HI HI CM I I O CM HI HI 3§ >• >• K» o o ^ CM lA cn o -> oo O < K tt 2 HI M -1 HI HI M 2 ^ }H lA ^ U w HI o ui g lA HI O CM O 1 in I •-4 u yi ui Z Z _ 141 m u H CM UJ I4J >» HI O HI 4* HI CM IN I O CM N HI > Z< lu in O. M tt III X Z M ““Soi o O U XU O O tfj ^in in < < < < H u H u u a ^ < UJ lA N lij I4l CD HI >• X X O 9 UJ ^ H -i HI in U lA 3 a lAss o M u «nT 3»l! M «i Z ^ ^ " ly ro M ^ U X tj ^ Kl O -J -i M M ^ ^ ^ U iijgg§iu I CSf ^ ft « U K ^ ^ t 5CSi U U O 3^ft ^ O si r»• • i & s|I lU s tn ft sM H 8S Ss g|HI CL VIsao & M ft IM CSI Vi ft ty ft I & IM Ul 5 ?5 ft M o >■ ft O ft -.| o UJ I ^ ft N < U ft 9 lU CK H -J ftg U ft ^ ft ftss -i o z UI« = M ^ ft HI ft H O ft ^ ft z s 9 oca liP 00 =fe r M UJ H cn lu lU lu lu M ac o O r 'VV.k r;- ® il HI mm?' V-* - ip •"a r*.V » ; v'* I# :•....'4ms 4 m-’i V!v ^ ■ K f •1• ■\./i/-^.:''«SS^“11®■#Si-^rS9 I Li™ - V \ V -1 4 . U^L - » T * ' • ‘W \'*i Tv >^•4. ^ '-i .■,r»i 'r-J ■ m % /r' ' Vt • ^ V- ' JW' -vYi V \ w j '^4 - i ¥\ , v t4'< ■^ i.-' “ri ‘ • >cigj I 1Ife ^ J f ■ki’ .^•<4 -• «•<•' ■ ■ ** *•■ ■:--v\ ■' ■ sTtfiSHocBa . ^ ■j S ' 1 CASCO COVE mOMSED SUBOIWSIOM FOR DOUG KLIHT, THOHMS BERMER B GARY BARR OF TRACT V, R. L.S. MO. 461, LOTS JKH62.»• aMRTOf MS SPRM6 PARK, AMD PART OF VACATED MAPLE RVEMOF AND LOT t BLOCK I, IVY ESTATES ■pM ’HyM \V,m ,' > U-A m ‘ r K iV ■■'M •■Ikit 'm 5 ijg *./r f.r' 4. • '*», i - w ' .-iff • 'T'' " ■ ■t Maj ' ^Wm •:<.."';=l 'V ' •^K CTjr-V WKn-v8. LocKjnon^ %kvs^ o*^ /IS * 6^li.^'T’S i»; • ’« <F- 2 hartbf Mrtliy that thla aurvay was praparad by aa or uadar ay dlraat aapa^ ▼ialoa and that I aa a duly Raglatorad land Swraayor undar tha lava of tha Stata of Mnmaota. ‘ Ai •. rV?' (MR3UN «. corm CO., OK. r ^ 4^ •l;.| iMk - SO flMi nag. py. RSSU Mark S. <Jrortbam 0*g. Mo. 1?75S Cn^lnaara and land Survayoro Long laka, Minnaaota . 1». > Wy: f v4 _ . Fr m tOz FROM: DATE: SUBJECT Zoning Applied List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit The app lakesho: applied] with kil additioi eonstru* The proi I have e« lA two e seeond : would al a seeond require Note thi varianei dwelling might n< MEft a 6Mnr 0AIW 07S Ma mRT Of VACATED MAPLE 4MEMUE Vou4<t*^ £^>64r>OA)S this «ur«*7 «*•■ i«r aifMi npai» f laai bt SUt* «f 55 I w- ■ > r*:' m I' • m:. tOz FROM: Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:August 8, 1984 SUBJECT: #845 Alan McDowell, 905 Ferndale Road West - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-IA - 2 acre Application - Guest apartment in principal structure [Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd 3(g)] List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Construction Plan Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Statue Excerpt The applicant appeared before you this spring for a variance to a lakeshore setback, which was granted by Council in March. The applicant is requesting to be allowed to construct a guest apartment with kitchen and bath facilities and a separate outside entrance in addition to an entrance to the main house. This is proposed to be constructed above the garage approved with the previous application. The property was sewered in 1981; the house is connected. I have calculated the dry buildable lot area at +2.95 acres. In the LR- lA two acre zoning district, this does not meet the standards for a second residence. Does Planning Commission find a hardship which would allow varying the lot area requirement performance standard for a second residential unit? As in other cases such as this, you should require that the apartment never be rented. Note that the State Statutes would allow the city to "permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling". (see attached copy) This is very vague in how it might or might not apply to this situation. dlL GENERAL L PROPERTY Site Prope Pleas (for Pleas surve APPLICAN1 Name Maild OWNER Name Mail: Date I (d< FEES - C( ,/ Other Ap rator >ning Code Lance to a irch. The apartment ntrance in osed to be plication. 3. In the LR- ards for a ship which andard for you should srmit as a two-family It might or 'wmm L JUPIP*'CITY OF OROHO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION _ _ _ _ _ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 10 ^ 1^_ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^^1.0 ^ JSfSo Sc. ^ Please check one — Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey APPLICANT Name kli/Th/ Ale Phone 473-1^1^ Mailing Address <^0^ UiPJX yi f OWNER Name Phone Al'h-i^ ts Mailing Address ^0S~ (Jtir PFiZOJDIVt& Hk, SS3^ < Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - Conditional Use Permits / 4^^||g|OD) Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling) $150.00 e) Commercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals ClIIOFORONO Other “ see fee schedule (over) -Y>%- r t i I- i IV $ present use O]Present Z Present U description O Describe PAf t Lt 71 i ArkiTs U V REQUIRED SUSP 1. Completed 2. Certified from Henn 3. Stamped, above li: 4. Certifici 5. Construd 6. Plat Map The Applicani that your ap included. APPLICANT'S The applicani the Zoning Ad; in review of t and correct Applicant's OWNERS SIGNA The owner h authorizes i agents, comm and verifies Owner's sigr Applicant mi Planning Coro Monday of e« 45 'i. /Sf£e> Sc.^ _ t~9.-94 [U OftIO__ V torrens? Luded on required I i'i "Z-AT7V li Y y Hi I.V. ■f SOWS 2 0 13:34 F ORONO 4' —B1 Wm" :.i'■yyyfi %■ V’. present use of propertyPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property ::d(l€s.\T>6tsJ'n f('L Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: gfOOg-ST Pe^^»SS(0^ ‘i.* t-AifiLln t:S —122,- -^ ^ required submittals 1. 2. 3. Completed Application Form. certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 • (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348 32 1) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. certificate of survey. - (WCtvt*0 w>T3, TtUcrt. vjWUhMCe tlCOt'EST. M_____j_______a. ^ if ar\r%1 g r'ahl CTIO '^ILE. VS I tvJ iS” ^ 4. 5. Construct 6. Plat Map. The AoDlicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember ?hat your Ippl "cation is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The aoolicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by Sle zoning AdLnYstr"ator, agrees to pay all fees an^or in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ..Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application an^ authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, .c°"®“Jtants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this reques^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _Owner's signature Date *7/^^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ‘■4,- i fi,;- . • i .1 km cm mm t :n • ^ 4 A m KiTCH&U <y\jc^ "<Li »tain this list Iter 348-3271) he names on the lease remember 1 has not been 9r requested by >enses incurred upplied is true on and further , consultants , t investigation 'la I Says before the leld on the third ■vv^;. .-mm mm . sJ 'M ;v;<; 'vVl pilfi . ii - :Jk; 11m ' ■■ : ^ ■ f ■■ ■■■fii ■•.-.• ’:J ■ .jL 1mi 1^ • /s 1 V O t - J o =l/^~ $P/J —— ■ \1 o II i ■VI A \ J '• V-,‘' A 9*9 \ / m "L- I* n 0'loil JO Ail9 9ii ■IBEBaRHSIPW JO AAIO rftir 4 •<1 ^ .^1*1 ■1^ mm ft»• 9^ H lAl fO CM I h* Kl Uf lA >. >. ^ lA III Ul I CM SSM M _ - . Im lA 3 »A ttl 7i55S I CM s »l|sl^ lU IM O < CMS o o ^ o a < ?iiii i lA IM “RISIS mS K KQ^Sllii I CM IM 3 H ^ ^ ^ 9 ^ IM IM O < fA O X S ^ 3 CM CM O B »A5!SS yj» ^ IM «J lA I K U U fM IM M M B ^ ="-si;i!: lAlAalsisa lA lA CM I 1^ IM lA mi lAa a < S5S IM I CM lA cS COm Mi IM O < X X 3 S S C9 o V 1 S !j a 2 “«Q6g5 • SX“- 2 SS Z M >; Ifl — B O O •A CM IM B B lA CD UJ ^ g CD Ul lA S§ «J M U BiII Ul . IM < »2 lA 5 o II lA CM I I CM > > IM B B > IM IM ^ ^ •T ^ *2 w W M ^UOg|A “i IM _ lA IM IM CO X X M 111 UlII IM » ls§ aoE >• N IM r'/ lA CM I »R :iaS8 IS" = )!K9 I CM RSSS83 S n a Ul H“•a "i!! H O Ul 53553sK.g I’aEZ i-K Ul Ul O 2 O «A M M E8S5o3 A O < ^ CM B rA o O Ul B ^ Ul IM ^ rA CM I _ N IM ^ IM I CM COlA ,553S SSs“’iS I = = S “» -I -J IM3 IM Ul O X u u M X lA M M rIIIsS X X Ul 5 B 9 UJ < < ^ NB < Ul B OS ♦ & j ||§ lA CM I N !§S| IM IM lA rnjju, IM Ul Ul a Z MMESSoS $ lA CM I CM a ii> > IM B B > IM IM < §§s« ““SS IM Ul CO ^ X X CM H rA IM Ul IS "9 o a _ ® * •« S! ^ Ul , _ 5^ ^ ^ a in ^ < -I -J K M N S Z 3 Ul RKgg|£ • 3 <M a a Ul H O lA B ^“55a| ^ o -I ^ o < lA O < < ^ X “9____Ul . < >• N 3 5 Ullill BOH m'mrn •K-.fT^ * \' S » 1^ ss S 1 S c 5 -5 ^ rr ^ E £ t M• *s ^ •- =u5 ^afi 5 ^ ^ ^ tA S •• iK — e 1 s ^ ®2 ■£ <« a c u i «» « • fe — > c |.s5 g>c g ••.5^5 w S s 5 Mill• w 2i i 5 4 '-r:; ^-^Ur^oi r~- 8 S*il ! IUlrUU * •• Ll ,j|.iuWHi b83€5 s®>ml ’I r-fe .- • .1} 5 Sf c e "S o e 81 n 3 55 •• ^ £ Tc > c 4iw«jw>^wut»*;= ® “ ® s I s iS 5» ;e £ s 9 2 a S.11r?ti.-iiii >.*2 S §5 9 S M "•• i u 8 “S" S S- .« a ^5(S| J c.2 S' o 2 E •< >»i - rf « 5 ^ 3 e12|I &8.S gi „"j2S5 2.c fe •s .«---§ §■ 5 vg«i2^Eyf;5^« 7 9 ^ uIII? I "11 it cS^uy«M*e^ _____ • o '8-22 c ® ® 3 2 9 e r *A 2 .9.2 I 2 •* > I Mil 1*^5-ZlTi^ ii C ^ ^ s^li7 0‘£'5*.-=e‘“O'= ■= o “ «• T f. s 5 c 3 13 2 5 ■ t 1 E »!I £ 2 ■' s S*S=«|-5&^- B V . •« j *• ? 2 S 1^ L--i«s ? C2*5|'"^ C 5 J c c -2 H *- _ C . fe *• 2-= £ * S M fl^SsIlHl g^ S e C.O lliils £ si 1*3: "i c -c ? ^ Jg t u e O £ -“1S|5 ^ 1 e § - 5 2 > *= 2 5-Sow ^ " * " a ■* e « 2 U ' < * " - ^• ** 2 £ w.2igao5. -*2 a 1 SI S W c £ .•CS5®g-a>5-- 5 > 6.1c "•§ 2 S 3*!{S»2£'*w£m2 . i a e s £ If 5 g *3 >5 s ” c S 5- g •= s ?-3 s » ■£. 2 O 8» ^|-|S2e >* g E ^ - J era**2 S - 3 - • IIiltllt® < S 5 > E g-T3 3 55 - 2c ao w •• 3 •A J: x^aA«ite*-fu«M ^*-£.£■5 ®3£ --g £ ■? = S'® § £ 3-°l §1££8|u-;-o§ SCc>a9MC_> S * 2 E IS -1 2^11-* S! i Ht ^2 S-.2-, c o 3 ^ E - j u 2 ra -E Si c35 jj ea 3 - 3 S Jf S K . 8# ^ S 2 •■ Eg 2 §5:$ !r Eos wSq^c O - 2 — 81 2^xcm.cC-8.6 £^r««EE8#xy o2x-Sf •E « « *9 *E ?. *3 !6f ®lc5z 3 I 9- - = I ^ ^ r. >2 s i V i: X C .iP 2 Jls <« u e 5 i «a^*'.£“c 2 8^.2 2SA®^cs*'’*c •- X •• e - s e M ^ «8 V 5 :*S-5 5 J-Sig'-^ X 2 i*®55*3"E|. 11 X « w t-*E = E-x“-----— "E®"" « y ?.} lli.s 15-^ e.Js *• i liV *3 :i7L Ui •\j>, • wTT^ .Se£' ■ -5v'-> ^VV i:;"' -.<'1 N \* If 8i8etl>atfn - .^. ^-U».>Arwrfjt. _m^ Zoni Arec Con< Con< Lis1 Exh: Exh: Exh: Exh Exh. Exh Exh 245 ->S %!I e| uS:S •swz z "-I *s f* 5 c S o te) € Li ■'>•;*«r■ "f?"'WMM TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning DATE:August 15, 1984 SUBJECT:#846 Leekley's Inc., 2450 Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - RR-IB Area - Lot 2 = 3.6 acres approximate .6 acres wet Area - Lot 3-3.4 acres approximate of dry land Per Section 10.03 Subdivision 19, 20 and 21 and SEction 10.55 Subdivision 8 - Land use application required for excavation of wildlife pond Application - Conditional Use Permit + Variance required for 2450 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit required for 2500 Sixth Avenue North List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owners List Plat Map Location of Ponds ~ site plan Survey showing boundary of conservation easement Engineer's letter Hennepin County District Report 2450 Sixth Avenue North - Lot 2, Block 1 Willow Run The applicant proposes excavating approximately 8,000 sf of a designated wetland of approximately .6 acres. The City has a conservation and f lowage easement over the wetlands area designated at the 1032 elevation. It would appear after our rainy summer that the 1032 elevation did not adequately define the retention area. The house is now 15 feet from the newly defined perimeter of the wetland instead of 26*+ as approved. The wetland is a grassed area that contains water only at wet times of the year and based on the soils make up has moderate to^ slow permeability. The outlet of the wetlands is at the culvert^in the southwest corner of the lot. Such a wetlands has high assimilative capacity. As the City Engineer suggests the 8,000 sf of open water area should be replaced with an additional grassy drainage area southward to the culvert. I have no information as to the size of the watershed area and the retention capacity of the area after #2 back to back 100 year storms. The application must be reviewed by the MCWD and this type of information must be provided. The C ordin eary repor tradi desig ordin speci consi Revie Staff To ap] Willo enue North - 1 and SEction i required for I Avenue North ‘ North casement 000 sf of a 1 City has a designated at limner that the on area. The >f the wetland b wet times of rate to slow alvert in the assimilative of open water Irainage area he size of the ter #2 back to >y the NCWD and 'I- The City Engineer's report suggests a need to modify our current ordinance on wetlands. During the review of the Raster application eary this summer, the Council considered the many conflicts in the reports presented by the various reviewing agencies and the traditional position of the City regarding the alteration of designated wetlands. Council decided there was no need to change the ordinance but merely to set up criteria for such reviews and that if specific findings could be made, the alteration of the wetland would be considered. Review Criteria 1.Disposal of soils: Soils excavated from wetland could not be used to grade and fill banks of pond but had to be placed a minimum of 50 feet away from pond/wetland basin and hay bales staked around the spoils area. 2.Time of year alteration is performed: Suction dredging remains the best method but not always feasible. Early winter is the best time to dredge wetlands. In this application given the type of soils make up, early winter may be a must. 3.Location of dredged area within wetlands: Vegetation must not be disturbed between pond and outlet from wetland. Vegetation must remain to catch or filter sediment and slow down rate of flow. In this case, the grassy area at the 1032 elevation leading to culvert will serve as buffer—Conservation and Flowage easement should be amended to include newly defined protected area. 4.Replacement Factor - If the reviewing staff confirms reduction in assimilative capacity of wetland created by alteration than a matching area must be set aside to replace assimilative capacity. The extension of the protected wetland area south to the culvert providing additional grassy, permeable surface will provide replacement but adequacy of that replacement should be confirmed by hydraulic information. Staff Recommendation To approve the partial alteration of the designated wetlands on Lot 2, Willow Run based on the following findings: 1. The wetlands functions as a localized, seasonal collection basin and is not part of a major wetlands system. 2. Wetland is located in the outer edges of the watershed leading to Lake Minnetonka. 3. The grassy, seasonal wetlands assimilative capacity can be replaced by minor grading changes along the southern part of the lot. ■ V I f f M- I- -s V • ApproV Sta reg the the nec 25C (Cc thi Th a en li Th ve 4 our current application licts in the es and the teration of :o change the I and that if Land would be etland could but had to be retland basin area. ed: Suction not always ne to dredge type of soils s: ien pond and nain to catch LOW. In this >n leading to n and Flowage ewly defined aff confirms :land created ! set aside to (nsion of the irt providing Hill provide ent should be inds on Lot 2, id, seasonal ijor wetlands :he watershed :ive capacity es along the mm U A 1 f m ■ ■4‘ m1 V i i. '4* i lirfS 4. The the" property, until grade changes are mao __ _bodv until grade cnanyco 1 as a protected body within «; The wetlands is not included a P the DNR wetlands inventory. ,pp.oval is suhgect to the ioUo«ing conditions: ^ _ ...-Acented fcrnrorrafiorfors-tal^i "rfvfeS-: , owale along th€p.ovide the „ale along the a) Grade changes along house p south side of house.south sroe ox - - b) confirm additional P[°^®®^rtplace assimilative fa^icrtylf 8?000 sf of area lost in pond. 2. capacity . ^„ement that would provide a ”>®"^®/„®fS^|rare^ designate new protectea at 3. designate - - . ,i want Apply for a MCWD P®'“^tthJquantity^and quality of rllnoff"’'rt" culvert^ point is the same as before alteration. 4.fe?f“"th ^Tn'°"he°^ fe-creSiin “oT Conservation District. a) 4:1 slopes at uppermost portion of pond b) pond depth not to exceed 5 feet Ui - - A ^XC06d BfOOO S£ c) maximum surface area n a-rict . . the recommendation of the siE'i” t«„ “■.....................................Zl s «tUi"S ‘fCSS'Fi:a designated ^3, The Conservation District dvi encroaching P°*?. site in providing an ^ and the lack ofES:H:^ £si» s^SK*::.r,.. mum e realized rty. body within cil actionr aff review; lie along the ■o south of issimilative nd. that would will want I quality of as before ;he guidelines the Hennepin pond 8,000 sf ation District id applic®^^®*'' e owner and that 111 require all die. 1n involves more ic yards.) he alteration of Dpardized by an :t advises of the ;at for wildlife, nd the lack of ng and brooding. fmstn The pond will cover approximately 8,000 sf in area at an existing elevation of 1033* with a maximum depth of 5*. The pond's design will be the same as the pond on Lot 2 with 4:1 side slopes on the uppermost portion of the pond. Lots 2 and 3 * s septic drainf ield areas will not be affected by the excavation of the pond nor will it create any problems for surrounding properties. The pond will enhance the aesthetic value of the property. Staff Recommendation To approve the conditional use permit application of Leekley, Inc. to excavate a decorative/wildlife pond on the property located at 2500 Sixth Avenue North based on the following findings; 1. The excavation for the pond will have no detrimental effect on the surrounding property. 2. The improvement will enhance the aesthetic value of the property. 3. The area of the excavation is not located near or within a drainageway nor will it impede natural drainage in the area. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. Apply for a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit. 2. Construction of pond must follow guidelines setforth in the recommendation of the Hennepin Conservation District. a) 4;1 slopes at uppermost portion of pond. b) pond depth not to exceed depth of 5 feet c) maximum surface area of pond not to exceed 8,000 sf. 3. Applicant to pay for a separate conditional use permit application for Lot 3. ‘ ^ ./.fl—• ^=:- :^] an existing i design will he uppermost IS will not be any problems erty. Icley, Inc. to !ated at 2500 detrimental tic value ear or within ainage in the istrict IS setf orth in Conservation >ond. feet exceed lal use permit A-4A-f* r©l^ ^-oT5 <9 F 6JI d>«fJLO C Ic I ....!,.' ’feXHlBIT 0^ HOM^ft.C>A It ie'»9 !*»▼ Ft<.lo4 1 CS> Ho.^%-«-^rAC^K.I0*>*> J »T Fl-»♦ 04 1 N N. c>— \ 1 ^ 4 ^04:G O -------- ^ > ^ ** ir - - --1' P-f ?5' ?^toO /I / I |o->o C***T|»«a< • g,jT€*)*5«^^ U»lt --------' 'y I03V C<»-^T.-%«. 0---'O) / I / o':^r / |o3d ' (V,etf*r _________________ ✓ _________/ •*— t \ _ ^ - l<^3^ I i ___6 ............... ••• *• ^ .m ^ - ---------------------------- C^CW . --------------------- C»«lT*«iifS . fllLia 0*#kT«ut€S [i©[iOWLi ;. \ I jul .; 4IS84 _________________ . f -......jliy i CITY OF ORONH .*; I Ji»- 5 1984 3335 W. Si. P«-4 Mi"» pkttrn! August city of Box 66 Crystal Attn: M Re: Fi] Lee Dear J< The pr< not be The cr pacity drains If the be ret Additi drains lY r.F nRhi-in EXHIBIT 23S5 W. 7*—* St. Mi^»***t* 55//<J /94 mm.* 6f2-636-4600 Olio C. Botmnoo, P.E. Hobtri H\ Ratene, P.E. JtmRh C. AmdeHik, P.E, Bndford A. Umbers* P-^ Rkkerd E. Jyrmtr, P.E. Jemn C. Oison, PE. August 6I 1984 • M«>' • * M*.‘« City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay« MN 55323 » i;- 7 S84 .1 *«>•*> » ' • •' Ckiut K. Cook, f.£, Ktith A. Coidoo, P.E. Tkomat £. Nojrts. P.E. Mkkord W. Fo$ttf. P.E. Kobtrl C. Schoitickt, P.E. Mortm L. Sorvoh, P.E. DoooU C. Bunordt. P.E. Jerry A. Boordoo, P.E. Mtrk A. Hootoo, P.E. Ttd K. Firtd. P.E. Mkhori T. Bootmoon, P.E. Bobtrt B. Pftffkrtt. P.E. Doeid Lotkou. P.E. OmrksA. Erickson Uo M. Ponrisky Horton M. Obon - r0 m m * W CiVVi:FfK; Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-846 Leekly's Dear Jeanne, ^ -it-ration of the wetland on the Leekly property (Lot 2) could :;:sr.;r;s - drainage area. If the appliction is to be considered, **5^*^tiet*e» e minimuB.be reteiied between the open water area and the culvert ™t Sjan.'“?nio'?h:™nd“n5''d«liti‘on thHoid^ahape and conatruction operation. If you have any que.tione, plea.e contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:It 2557c 06 S. I E. P.£. E. GlriM K. Coot. F.e. KtUk A. P.C- Thomu £. Noytt. F-B- Mkkor^ W. FcMt. F.E. Notefi C. Sctookti, F.E. Morvio L. Sonoh, F.E. DoooM C. Burtordi, F.E. Jrrrx A. Eootdoo, F.E. MoHt A. Nmmw. F.E. MK. FM. F.E. Mktml T. Kooimomi, F.E. «e*M ». Fft0*ftf. F.E. Onii tortoM. F.E. CkorktA. ErtctMHi Uo M. Fowtbliy ttorioo M. OtaM '/! >t 2) could lie ponding ca- 8 from the narsh buffer 8 minimum, a which n operations. I be approached :e on wetland FEASIBILITY OF POND EXCAVATION FOR LEEKLEY'S INC. 860 East Lake Street Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Prepared by HENNEPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT 12450 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 205 Minnetonka, Minn. 55343 August, 1984 JM. EXHIBIT .♦..V mm single fai is descri developme ship 1 construc^ lots. S lines or ley's wa an analy followir Districi the lot (see F: from C lots a bromeg survey lots c tions able r moder< durin' capac age. L ^ • .a : ' i •';^v* ->‘> ■ ' :1^’...-- £ GENEI^ LeeKleys Inc of Wayzata single family residences ^ ^ Run Addition. This ::r;r irraU tr:; — carter of secon IS. To«n. ship 118 North, Range West.■ • ::r.;.rr. Z:...* - r- ™ r.r.rrr i;- rrr. t ::r:r r;:.- t:r lines or regulations pertaining District to conduct ley-s was referred to the the requested ponds. The - r"":renrtro;e"—^following presents* District. findings I on 1QR4 revealed R Site inspection ^pp^orilltely 3-65 acres each the lot size for hots 2 and 3 ^ driveway (see Figures lA and IB). The lots ut , ^^^h From C.S.A.H. 6 along ^heir co^°n ^..^^rily of lots are generally °P-' ^ Dluegrass. According to the soil bromegrass, reed canary gr . ^^^^^^tions of the two subiect survey of Hennepin County, th higher eleva- Tots Ltain Glencoe silty clay ^ ,^,,3 have high avail- tions consist of he Sueur loamy drainage, and moderate to able moisture ^ ^^ter table is near the surface n«,detately slow permeability. available moisture during wet seasons, he Sueur medium internal dram- capacity. They have moderate p 5 during wet seasons, .he water table is at a depth of 3 The most recent inventory of DNR protec age for Henn< not with: DNR auth( the vicii These bo; areas of approx im. below th 2, and 2 posed po (see the aestheti habitat proximit absence areas su area at 60 feet intum exc iroum exc excavate amounts is not 1 adjacen- :ing two property on. This on 28, Town lorize the bwo subject any guide- Dnds, Leek- to conduct (5 ponds. The de by the ~ 111,.mm. ... . . 984 revealed :res each ;s driveway jure 2)• Both T\arily of to the soil wo subject |her eleva- ive high avail- i moderate to the surface moisture nternal drain- ng wet seasons. »rs and wetlands for Hennepin County, released in July 1984, indicates this area is not within any protected water or wetland areas (see Figure 3), this< DNR authoriaztion to excavate or fill this site is not required. on Wednesday, August 1, 1984, soil borings were taken in the vicinity of the proposed pond locations as shown in Figure 2, These borings confirmed the existence of Glencoe soils in the low areas of both Lots 2 and 3. The water table was determined to be approximately at elevation 1030.5. This elevation is about 1.5 feet below the existing grade in the vicinity of the proposed pond on Lot 2, and 2.5 feet below the existing grade in the vicinity of the pro posed pond on Lot 3. RECOMMENDATIONS It has been proposed that one pond be excavated on each lot (see the pond location plan Figure 2). The ponds will enhance the aesthetic value of the property; however the benefits for wxldlife habitat is somewhat limited. Among the reasons for this is the close proximity of the ponds to the single family dwellings as well as the absence of proper vegetative cover for wildlife nesting and brooding areas surrounding the ponds. The ponds themselves should not exceed 8000 square feet in area at the t-r p* ^ meandering shaped pond of approximately 50 to 60 feet wide and 100 to 120 feet in length is recommended. The min imum excavated depth should be approximately 3-1/2 feet and the max imum excavated depth should not exceed 5 feet. Assuming an average excavated area of 5000 square feet and an average depth of 4.5 feet amounts to nearly 835 cubic yard*: per pond. If the excavated soil is not utilized as fill material elsewhere, it should be leveled adjacent to the pond to a maximum depth of 2 feet. . As discussed earlier, the excavated soil consists of silty clay. The characteristics of this soil is that it is very sticky and soft when wet, hard and difficult to mold when dry. It is a most difficult soil to handle by mechanical means, especially hand tools and small scale equipment. Due to the wet soil conditions and V V." im ..f ‘■■f-r!Am the large amount to be excavated, it is suggested that the ponds be dug out with either a dragline or 2 to 3 yard backhoe on tracks. Generally, ponds are constructed to provide water for live stock, fish and wildlife, recreation, fire control, or aesthetic related uses. The unfortunate feature of a pond is that it is a body of water in which drowning can occur. Brownings are the outstanding non-motor-vehicle cause of accidential deaths among people in active age groups, especially children. Some Safety Recommendations Are: 1. Post warning signs near each pond. These signs should be adjacent to each pond telling all who come near what the extreme depth of the pond is. The pond should be constructed with 4:1 side slopes on the uppermost portion of the pond, as illustrated on Fig ure 4. This flatter slope will reduce the chances of someone accidently slipping into the pond. Since this is predominantly a residential area, it is suggested that a low fence be installed around each pond, thus reducing the chances of unsupervised toddlers from accidently wandering into the ponds. These recommendations may not completely satisfy the requir- ments of local laws. EVERY POND OWNER SHOULD CONSEL with an attorney to determine: - his liability in case of serious accident or death at his pond. - legal requirements pertaining to precautions and safety at ponds. The privilege of having a pond on his property give the owner additional responsibilities. POSTING THE POND AGAINST TRESPASSERS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER OF THESE RESPONSIBILITIES. Each pond owner has the MORAL obligation to his family, friends, and neighbors |«.^W V '} ' . i ‘^1 f \ i r -i ■ ‘ I hN'l I mJ' •>i< to make prevent provide ient le' large e: The max imum su: safe co; owner s. . i.■m-- \ik^<j':vl 'iAt this Isa spresentntion boxindaries of .low Hun, the Istinp bulld- ‘on, and the )f a proposed not purport )verients or INC. » • • • Re*;. K-rlRe p • • f>OSA Itef. Ko.12755 Planners rn-. ■; rt te ^ = A 1 .•>;■•• '■ip-y I i: II. ■'m-:. , I l.» I 1T^ ^ ■ .»•■Wigg?”'f '> ? • Cortifirate of 5v»rv'ey for Loeklcys, Inr. of Lot 2, r.ioc< 1, >311ov Hur. Hennepin County, Minnesota 1 I ?*l I----- I ___------------------------------------1 I I '! i» I I I I 9f9 i I r ^ C*>rt/n«n ! I II I I • I * j [i — — --------------^ *“~e - ' -----------f^:2Z, rsr. tca ' 1 hereby certify that this is a true tine rorr'jct re:.res«r.t?ition of a rurvey of th*’! l?ur.c iri e.> of ’^12, rlo’rV 1, •..ill?v pur., tr:.» location of nil oxistin/: UiKd- InjTS, If any, th*jr»>»>r., kiv .1 t;:*,* proposed iocsticr. oi a prcpot’ci buildinp. Tt doer> not purport to shr.v otr.cr ir. prrv'r.-rr.ts or encrojchr-erts. g::!*.xl a. r:*fiK r:., inc KurK f. Ur. n': crr. K**!:. !***.!•' 2 l/ir.d Purveyor.", and Planners Lor.ij iJiVe, .^'InneriOtu cc^^rr ST^rS A.o H^r. M- * 1” = IX* !ror. r.'ir/cer 3-‘ ^ .i^ r r f 1 1'' r hC 15- •■ ■• #--S Figure j:'if '^38. ;i •,\-=-..- -;r4^i^ ' "tk :>-V. iw H .f *,. .. . ■% ! i/-’ ■ ^ ik't * I<fc V- »V 1 .1.}. M., ■A. ^lU I ■ ■••• n>f 1 «jjf_?*V t ’tSQ, wit^- VOMl^TO ww I I / ••••*»••« • •••••Ml 'I 5W<. L^« 5t>n^J IS HtJW ?ri . / IS H«lW H*mti V:Vl I.JN I H k ******f h U'^iw • • m > ^ I I ST . T"...■& p???•ft. n \ -r-^ -I—*-LlT project Wuhi»i» L»k9 •y. :A) LtmcrX •V.V Ij. »i '•*~ 15 »ytf j| II -VnTirr^ "t i'y i -k '' i»w i l'74^i ^stlir -d Dj • \ LONO LAK» Al A A fiTn/rif SA?J TV « I . j 'trj, vrJui .... ^ ^ ^«;4.p vi'O 'T41 ! - V:<Ei,'=r... I---- protected 1 ,, ••>•••I '>1-.<*•.• • *^.4» . Am •f ^V I• ^iVOUNO^ ^^^kri-/Lv?------------- « i'^ ■' ,i :=• •n •• ■■.'3 i,.;- f-J.- r-/ m ' > -••A* ■mm: ■ pV^ ; • • ••‘■^1 •d ■i V ■ i i ■ r* ^ •• ».-f - 7U&- l:« i • ■• : I ®v1 i-.f Vf f Kv’--•4t5vv■V..' *•■* •., To: Fro:^i: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron August 7, 1984 #847, Catharine Cram,3760 Watertown Road - CUP Zoning District - RR-IA, 5- acre Application - Conditional Use permit for a guest unit attached to an existing house (Zoning Code Section 10.20 Subdivision 3 (G) ) List of Exhibits Application Plat Map Sketch by applicant Construction plans Property owners list The applicant is requesting to remodel an existing wing of the main house on this property to create an apartment for her brother-in-law. This unit is 27' x 20' and was previously used as an attached dog kennel. The unit is proposed to contain its own kitchen and bath. The house is the main structure on an 82.5 acre parcel used mainly for pasture. This house is 600' from the nearest lot line. A second house exists on the property near Watertown Road and has been historically a caretaker and/or rental house. This second house has its own well and septic system, and could be divided off from the rest of the property with no problems. The proposed guest unit in the main house should not have an appreciable effect on the septic system. The existing septic system should be inspected to ensure it is functioning correctly. The owner has been allowed to start the remodeling with a restriction on the permit not allowing the installation of kitchen facilities, pending formal approval of a C.U.P. The standards set forth by the ordinance for "Caretaker Apartments" require additional area to support an additional residential unit. This 82 acre parcel certainly meets this standard. Staff recommends approval of this Conditional Use Permit for Catharine Cram based on the fi/iuing that there is adequate area and width on the property to supp^rjct. an additional residential unit in the RR-IA zoning district, subjt^ct to the following conditions: 1. Guest apartment unit may never be rented out. 2. Existing septic system must be inspected and approved by staff for this additional unit. 3 '-'■‘if ■; I i GENERAL LAH PROPERTY LC Site Ad Propert Please (for Cc Please survey. __JInRla.lt APPLICANT Name _( Mailing OWNER FEES - Cond Other Appli : - ■' 4 y. ■ •'^r5r:‘ ' ,< 'I - '■ft• 'M'' "Y ■«. ‘ r,' 0^t*y- ;’. 4 I ^ ••f • t •m* •• ' •. • . •,. •• , " , fc/ ■•■*.-•••.* l-^ ' -■ ^ '“■f t ■ 8 -. . ^ m f—;r^ / / i <\ 'h(/ r*«o o 3 fV *’ . \ ' • •■ *1 » * f ^ * k' * M * • • •♦ • ;:rr rS':;--v; v;^;.-'- I-- —TV . IV •'•.• .: ..w • •;•*>;• * 1% ;• • * *[ f^■,v;rr •:■:-■-iik I 'l-L,: • .■■-VJ •V *.- .v-’- ■•• . h t A^'V ‘ *• ' > 1! ' j a' . I ., iJi *,, .p:^, •■ . • f * : . > • •.' * I 1*=■r'^rm I »*4S'. • f ^'/.A ' - - ■ . 'si V'^>v ■ =; • • I-':::\i .m',^ i:%^rL'. ’A '■ y^|^r:'-ic^r::-''"iir^-3 M : i >- \ n* •' '• '•* >v.'J >• • •v>./ .,».:•■■ :y/v- A-'.. - . ■ -■<•1» ?. *1 ** * •' ■i. f / \ . I, • *• ^ .s . ••- . .. I /,'• ... * ‘ » ' *k »*,1 *''•* \ • .■ ■ • . ,.» ••••>: ♦vjf.l .,• ,* If * ’ * ' I' • : > -,.. • •'V • .. .4 ‘ •.; " • V • , V ‘-. ‘ • . :V;f,.T,5-.-'. =, ^ / • • -I.. • *** ••. * • r » *• * ..■•^,:,^vf. -V-. " V . V....; '. M>^ Ji i .. V. »• . • ‘ M * • •* *:• ■ ,\ ' '■ ■ . /iV; •• 'v-' "4.v. * ‘ ■• ;> A..Vr •• .♦.* .•••••' • * • »^ ’ ' •-'* •' ; ” , .• k « ••.■•'• •• * .• • - ‘ ’ * *. M k.V’ . >. V^V.vV \-‘ .»><’ ’* r-s'it'* •^•V '.V^V } L,- •■« i /•-” |MS'4P'7 , P /v.-- • ^'''. *• • • V. -; Vp>'.-v' :;r' ..-.P ».*• *, •■ ;V. L^v ' <'!. t • - . . .'<.'!• . /, ' ' •' I 8 * . ’ * » « ! 1 • >.>■ ^ i !»'•••: - ’i ».:*■* I ► f m . • A 8*-» •. . 1 1 • # •V • ' • '•'.Ik j*. , • 'iv* V- >:- '.{ . ■ .•'“i >•. ‘ am4\ jfH| • k' • ¥ I p —» f < SSliiSsiI >• M M O 3 - r >? j HI -I Ul tt tfl • S3o{ •J ly 2 : M lU < HI M MJ M Ul A ^ iU IM M 2 CD 5 <0 i iVi lA X g“^tu M 0 (9 M « < s • % •’ .* . ' • . • • ' *" ■ •. . ‘ * * ' ''. ♦ .i ■!• • . *.«• I . • *• - • * •• *•.', / •. •-V ‘ ;V '■V .; ]■ V . • *“ **^ii^-* .. A • # - A \ • ■•■; •' '. V‘V -:' • ■■■ v- 'V-- .• ■■.■••■•, . •. * *• ; V <\ • i ■* ' .'•' K j. 1 « . - ■ . . ■•aV • * -X ‘ / . s :-V- Vv'-, ^ ‘ *% ' * *. , 'X , » » ■ t r'.i# * » « k 1 /. • f <l4 ^ .* .JV * : 4 * v«>.' ' ’.•■#. ttl vb I t V u ■*• k* . >g«g «i <A III S ^ w ^SSSiSS M 0) !^ial§§.1 im K K O Z ttl lAl M O 49 lOlkl -> HI HI r ::i3 ^ III IM *883 p Si g . N gS So S m“-I S O O Q i“ -g? s P M HI . _ ft HI .^S MM M 0MkM< 7 M |•|l| * -1*2 3 :isi s|si a. S a rfigs r IB b WP ^ • III X H Zs sSss > e < ^ U 9 U1 si5|g SSOOFX•^g«PS«t !"ii|§M 90 lA III Ul ^ UIIU III O CA M S -i r O < tt o Q Z HI ^3 >T N r S p MI*" Js “ ^ K s QE S Z M III O O O ^ I H «! K Z KM"3P ^ > K M I ^ S M H H Z HI O « K HI ^ lU HI O ^s^SSSIHI O a CK HI X .mn T M M § CL P ^ Z SSI33R2 ^ o 3° •i4 2 > HI P HI _ K M H 5 IH HI S 3 «M O III HI S H. 2 «i HI >lHssi g r r H«i33 HI O HI HI M M HI ft Hk li. M HI ft ft I H HI HI CM _ HI P Z Z CM HI HI M »5§§l: 8 Sii silisi 5‘M-gUH. CM HI P O Hi HIS£S«.3 3 HI HI O P P ft m pi«i CL HI ft CM O sii Hi* U P M oe )£ X 3 !Q71^88?“'s^ggs ZI ft ft < HI P P P ^ QS8|g|« m 9 -w o *^ •> K» M: i-.y , ■ ■•' »■ ■i i ‘•H *i i:t ip . / .m ‘m ■ir-^•V . ;:r.v.;^W- .':•.-• • '■ • k^v:. ' \:■^.1 ■ ’. .«- •C; la ii K •^5 p p ^ ••rr- r*'PI TO: FROM: Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:August 13r 1984 SUBJECT: #848 Lowell Zitzloff, 3542 Shoreline Drive - Variance Zoning District - B-5 Application - Variance to rear setback-requesting 10* setback instead of 35* required List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Property Owners List Plat Map Topographical Survey Site Plan Proposed Applicant is requesting a variance to rear setback standard's in the B-5 zone to place a commercial structure 10' from the rear lot line. Applicant states that due to topographic conditions, to meet the required setback would need a 10* high retaining wall which would create an unusable area behind the building. Applicant also states that the residential neighbors to the north are in favor of his proposal, but he has not submitted letters or written confirmation of this. ¥ou have various options: 1. Approve the variance based on the applicants stated hardship. 2. Deny the variance finding that applicant could meet the setback but has not demonstrated an acceptable hardship. 3. Table the application and have i^pplicant submit a site plan meeting, or more closely meeting the setback requirements. if: •Y; . » 4 CITY OF ORON< VARIANCE iAPP: PROPERTY LOG Site Add Property Please c Please a survey. APPLICANT Name Mailo..ig OWNER Name Mailing Date Pr< I (do) I PRESENT USE Present Present DESCRIPTION Describ to VARIANCES R Setback Other - Variance back instead ct^s in the B-5 lot line, to meet the which would also states Eavor of his ifirmation of cants ould meet the i acceptable submit a site the setback Ci!fY OF ORONO VARIANCE ^APPLICATION #848 fV /S^}of. Application Feel^$100 After-the-Fact Fee^200.00 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3542 Shoreline Drive; Navarre _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 17~ 11 —23—43—^^_ Please check one — Is the property X abstract or - - torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Lowell Zitzloff Phone 473-4680 Maili*g Address 1805 East Wayzata Boulevard; Wayzata, MN 55391 OWNER Ndm0 LowsXl Zitzloff Phone 473-4680 Mailing Address Wayzata Boulevard; Wayzata, MN 55391 _ _ (month/year)Date Property Acquired January, 1984_ _ _ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District B»5 Present Use of Property __ _ _ Residential Other (specify) unimproved DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 120,000.00 Describe request in detail: Rearyard setback variance from 35 feet to 10 feet along the northerly property line. _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area * Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width Front . Hardcover Side ^ Rea II#1 *1 r-i \v* mm s Ma si f I Si sM S3 ScES oE 5 liJ lAl Z M ^ M A Hi gl ^ UJ j 5 u -#SS III HI SiiSt; r HI s c.s sSiS z 8 ta M M K HI HI Id eg 88 HI HI ID ID HI 5 E O K is;5 ess i m M ft e K HjsS.als ttl ttl . A HI u ft H -i in ni M 3 m < in 1 ft _ tt. X ^ 55 X J M^1 St y 8*98 ES t*8*“o • atssS o s o <SI CL a lu X Miy ^ <As r S§s®a A << rl^SSux•4 «J M M M £ •SSSS” 1^ III m ly 2tt a a. M I B M M «i SS*-*-Si K a w S ^ ** e «s o «( -?8gSS « HI Ul UJ ^ < HI O CD O HI 3 |S|i ""5S SSoS ttl HI >HI <in ttl in HI U ^ > MMX1 ft ttl ttl 228 S O CD O S M O ttl •-4 ly o «J «J ttl < a* HI > H O IJ ^ < ttl 3 III _ < ttl in HI U ttl X > M M ttl □ < M N ^ _ ae u-i a t e ? < ae 4 «J H-« a 9 J <N X -* a N a u a <M >> S e ft 3 a S a u HM M w I r* > ft a o X “3S*7 3 sSxiSi ^ w a!g a lu w 5 a a 78838“*r» X K n a a ► l» o « ^ a a ft — a a ON a e o (9 >« in X X in ^ .HI M M in < o ^ S HI 3 N •- ttl IL IL HI > O O H) HI___in ft K ttl in HI o iS ttl > ni M o o - Ip HI III ttl in < A O H H HI X ttl >* ttl ttl -I M ^ tt. O -I M X SSf?» U ttl ft HI ttl IM m ft XI B ft H*» X ttl «4 B ttl aJ ly K O -i tM X _ in ft ft ^ u ^ Hl< < M HI o u ttl ft m ttl ttl M m M M HI m X CD CD _ • ft z< ttl «• ttl 2 ^3 3H»>- $ M O O 5 A O ttl ttl M X |gp «i -J ttl m HI ttl >• N .fttgtti sss'^aE !i„5a3| 8 o S 2 3 5a Ik ^ ftX Ik a ais^s St^!< "'§1 «? N§ A- fi* I 1 L tr *•' ■ •■• •.*i? M ft in m I siss ^3S§i ttl ttl I silii S 31 Pertinent Subdi ■ —'-* ■ '* * . J ■.■in •:«^i I'i .'V^''.‘v .A ' iv.: > ,■ il 4 <. ■*1t'L^ .IL«.-r^r" TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Orono Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 15, 1984 #850 Dennis Thompson 250 Old Crystal Bay Road - Variance ^“"sSbSivf:ron°;r 3. List of Exhibits: Exhibit A - Application B - Property Owners list C - Plat map D - Site plan E - Survey K; Section 10.28 use permit and variance application lect ® conditional of animaifarrpermft;°3 Subdivision 4, tion must be done in accordancrwith applica- Section 10.20 Subdivision 3 standards set plication fee required for a nnrx^i*.- That portion of the ao- funded to the applicant. onditional use permit will be re- Review of Performance Standards loll“ri50'“rom®nellest°[ot°l®""® be2. n“r --- each additiLal®horlef°''The%foDlrt'’°''®® ^the owner will be limited to^fhS contains 16.4 acres, h.. »<■«... a variance to this seen on applicant must seek Minnesota bred racing horses f5r'"th°" raise race horses and the traiSino o2 w^*’® P'^’^Pose of selling paddock areas are located alone horses. The the ordinances do no? reoufre ? Property lines - note nor do they requirr?c«e???? horse ^owners l? o?™®"®® ®tandards ^®®P horses for their own hohKv^*' rural areas hobby farm owner. The subi«>oi> rx typical by 2 acre residential deveioD^nt°?e'^*'^4.^® surrounded immediate north, single (countryside) to the ®®'^oss Old Crystal Bay to w??t park. to west and on east by a DNR (A) 1-V.. -f> ditional vision 4, se and applica nards set the ap se re- (A) e for acres, ses. seek se Lling ses. The - note areas indards ‘eas cal led the th DNR '"•'V <1 *j **•■• w- ’ mm 1 v3 wmm mm V. Hr -5 • • 4 z.w ■>' ■ :!'» . ;♦ l’‘SSSai r«-ii •V 5<. • r ..•-.!/! .V 9 Vv.,=.^ .'jdK&«* .k_S«f' W%;.' Orono Planning Commission August 15, 1984 Page 2 This is not the applicant's primary source of revenue or profession. The breeding and raising of race horses is his hobby and will continue to be. i&illilliiilii. in riding, specifically, steeplechase training. I am anxious to hear your reaction and response application as it will establish a precedence and set forth lines for the review of similar quasi commercial uses of residential property. Alternative action for Planning Commission: To approve the variance application of Dennis Thompson that seeks a variance to the performance standard of Section 10.20 Subdivision 3K that states the keeping of domestic animals must be for non-commercial purposes based on the following findings: 1. The applicant's principal residence will be located on the subject property. 2. The application as proposed requires no additional variances to the performance standards for the keeping of domestic animals. The proposed level of use will be compatible with the surrounding 2 acre residential zone. 4.The use as proposed presents no more intense a use of the property than a hobby farm use. To deny the variance of Dennis Thompson based on following findings: 1. Commercial use of a residential property is in viola tion of intent and standards of RR-lB zoning district and Comprehensive Plan. 2.The proposed use will alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. 3.Review Section 10.08 Subdivision 3 A 1-7 for additional findings. a i ./I j r; H ■ flEUBRAL LA PROPERTY I Site A Propel Please (for < Please survey APPLICANT Name m Maili] OWNER Con Name e Maili Date I FEES > Co Other Api . .. '"'i^it; le or his >y farm Staff 2rty 1 Road jperty. training this orth guide- f residential ce tates the imercial ► located litional the Le with se a use 3n following s in viola- tig district character or additional M «■ a,! -V « f; & 1II § A‘J : • / •••"..■ . V -V§B"\*- ■ CITY OF ORONO V—OBRBRAL LAND USE APPLICATION ^ ±'.b.r^ PROPERTY LOCATIOH Site Address Old Crystal Bay Road Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 04 117 23 13 OOOA Please check one — Is the property _ A A abstract or _X torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Dennis 0. Thompson Phone 933-2521 l^ailing Address 12201 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55343 OWNER Contract for Deed Vendee Name Dennis 0. Thompson Phone 933-2521 Mailing Address 12201 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55343 Date Property Acquired June, 198A (month/year) FEES - Conditional Use Permits a) Residential Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling; $150.00 e) Commercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals H©gDW JU.25I984 CITY OF ORONO Other - see fee schedule $100.00 Variance - $100 (over) -|V ■mi t ■ft] nt—BM—t-- PRESENT USE OF Present Zon Present Use DESCRIPTION OF Describe re dwelling, ba REQUIRED SUBMIl 1. Completed P 2. Certified P; from Hennep 3. Stamped, le above list 4. Certificate 5. Constructi< 6. Plat Map. i The Applicant a that your appl: included. APPLICANT'S SI< The applicant h the Zoning Admii in review of thi and correct to Applicant's si OWNERS SIGNATU The owner her< authorizes rea agents, commis and verificati Owner's signat Applicant must Planning Commi 343 343 2 51984 )F ORONO .•ft. 1■ i I ■'i ♦ k..*• * TTiiipni^^ ^ ^A-> ‘ . . 'JK- v. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ' . ' Residential Undeveloped Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: dwelling, barn and paddocks Construction and maintenance of residential REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form. 3. certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you “n obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4.Certificate of survey. On file as Exhibit A to Resolution 1040 adopted 6/12/79. 5. Construction plans, if applicable 6. Plat Map. See Item 2. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by and correct to the best his/her Applicant's signature / Pl/Vl/yLl OWNERS SIGNATURE Date 7/90/84 Dennis and verification of tj^^e^equest Owner's signature ^ /UX/VL4^dltlhul=i===i 7/20/84 Dennis 0. Thompson ^ mm ^m ws ^ mm ^m mm iw mm « Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25r^n Cnmmi ssion Meetings are held on the third i •.' ' ase remember lias not been requested by ises incurred tplied is true 7/M/84 and further consultants, investigation 7/20/84 ^s before the j^a^SBBSSS^2ig-a*M ^ - -.;j’ li i $ s s s« u u ro r $o S < o iS Z UJ O S HI IA 5 K HI ZHI M o z z ^ H M M X3•A CX U. H. 2 CO Z HI X 7B88|i 5a““Siu sISIsI lif ^ rSozni Ik s s s •hi iA O M III II) Hi C ^ g W U S) U U ^ ^ ii> X 2 & Sz^izHI 2 <5 *5 vgsfSsisa Kl U K M W I O Z M >- R®55R z ,L3!Sa’"* I « _ o in «) <A O .. ?5 o "> “> M 01 « r U Z Z H«J lAJ Z 102 ^ Z lu > Z -or-8« .8;iS8S .a s§is3 >* M to H O HI Ki yj >» M H K _ • M OB O . ,X HI UJU 2 z n H UJS*5^.5 M 5^ HI »r HIKt 01 ^(M HI HI • X fe ^N O Ui Ul HI Z ^ U. •'*“§2 X X H. >- - *z»8“5oa S HI M HI ^ Wl- >r Ul UJ Z HI <ro UJ HI HI M h- a a I M ui ui SSSii^Hi“aSiMx u u S <3 N K MW P-4 M -I -j ^ OUo K lO UC r M HI M 5 ^ OHI«o 5 SB 33* • MO E N X z HI ^ 2 M «< H HI e oe at N r r r Vjfj i lO CJ ®nnn *^CJ t mr**nQnQ IT>CVJ w J 5SJiA H lyM i IM I_M -I N lil HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEMproperty ouners list REPORT NO. PI415401 ' PA6E 7 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND 2JC REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPi«TMEp OF PRWERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF^ DATE [>00 • ,s ' ^ : i*' • 4B • V ■ . ♦V •>* ‘ ' t V' t \ , * ♦ *• ^ > . f %} r^. X ■ • V- V. V * ■' - V • ».V ^ r. :V 7 :A-' '^7-7 ;.7 ' Kffc. „ ■y- ^ wmu smm ''^ ‘' • '.5 ::. .-. • • -:• ^ s ASBWJ: €\:\ U. y"M '■.; ^ V ^--v ■• .’;■ • mm im‘X • ; : * y:fsy ■:.■■f' W^y: mm m&rn .■:■.. ■ / *.' <,Vx-'7;>; ■;'.^ ! • • ■•V-' • . " =•..»■ ;■ ■:y: \AM . .t.^■ /•:? .±2.\y. ■ REPORT NO. PX43S401 PACE 7 TRUE THE RECORDS TO THE REST ■j? k->.. A . ‘ s % . I •. y- 0 ■s - .4*' . . f/ % / t . • >> V . * - A Mmi *■ :> ■ ^ v:V4 •SV-'M > -I. • 'i .:vi t' tr-: , r-‘ -»': > fiC '*• v» I sp^hc>i - —Kl« •\&o ^ v_ •r?--' i • •* C ■/« L* ‘ • 1 4 - >^|T 7ZTi fC77 ------------------f 'TTfZi “ •4 ^ ^ ? 3 ' ’ •»..* ’ ‘ it 9*7 T l Z i i f 15 » •■■ . u u s'?' .'■ ■ r -v t.:m K:| Zoning Applic List G Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi This i{ the £r setbac topogr the pr< the va] 5 (B). Applic main s 10.03, prefer Would Staff recoinir struct rv-; .■ ■_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ TO:Planning Commission FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:August S, 1984 SUBJECT: #851 Richard Stueland & Ramona Barbeau# 4080 Bayside Road Variance Zoning District - RR-IA - 5 acre Application - Construct a detached garage less than 100* from front property line. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Topography and Sketch This is a request to construct a detached garage approximately 55' from the front property line in the RR-IA zoning district where a 100* setback is required. There is an obvious hardship due to topography and location of the existing house and driveway» forcing the proposed garage to be nearer the road chan the house and requiring the variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and 10.27 Subdivision 5 (B). Applicants sketch also indicates garage is to be located 5* from the main structure rather than the 10* required, requiring a variance to 10.03, Subdivision 12. From a fire safety standpoint, staff would prefer keeping this 10* setback and moving garage closer to the road. Would applicant have a problem with this? Staff recommends approval of the street setback variances and recommends applicant be required to keep the 10* structure-*to- structure setback. i f. ■. i . ■ 1 m \i CITY OF 01 •• VARIANCE i PROPERTY : Site . Prope Pleas Pleas surve APPLICANT Name ' Maili OWNER Name Maili Date I (do PRESENT U Prese Prese DESCRIPTI Descr VARIANCES Setba Other Wayside Road * from front :ely 55* from rhere a 100* hip due to f^ay» forcing nd requiring Subdivision I 5' from the variance to staff would to the road. riances and :ructure-to- :a< CITY OP ORONO VARIANCE APPLICA #851 R C-C^p ^ '^d- Application Fee ($100 .^^1/ After-the-Fact Pee $T^.OO PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^0 90 Mn Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) tlH - 00^*^ _ _ abstract or SC torrens?Please check one — Is the property Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT^ . /I ,K’SLmciH'^ L jSaroCJiL Name ^K.lL^nrl 'R S'hde.lfinH Phone 7 < Mailing Address ^ MaJ OWNER /-O ^ Ifs^mons^ L. Daoheau Name 'fiu'hnnd "/? 3hj^ f/%nrf Phone V75--0^70 Mailing Address ''Kri M/\l Date Property Acquired ' 7^ (month/year) I (do) J^o notj also PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property own the adjacent parcels of land.______________feiMMOM JUL 261964 rN Residential !TY OF PRONG Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ S.OOOt Describe request in detail: Vo kuiCl cLl4/i/'kii^ nifiLLhis ' OCL^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width Setback Variances ( \/ Front _ _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other !»i| ' ■ .W'- - . . i* .. . ■'■mTZ'" - ^ ^ M h * m hardship Descrit enforce gM2JJL. descriptio* Descril Requir< p (5^ required si Comple (5^ Certif fromH€ 03.) Stampe above Certif Plat N0 The Applic that your ' been incli APPLICANT' The applic the Zoning in review c r»nd corre* Applicant OWNERS SI' The owner authorize agents, c and verif Owner's s Applicant Planning Monday cl ^ - ^{$ioo^os)y I Fer"T?00.00 ntuct fAl ^-/V» co/^ ^ torrens? ncluded on required N a J ^£3-^ 5 ■a7<:> i_ r) fr l. K/ ll\JUL26l9e4 i.i ITY OF PRONG Cost $ ^000 ofou^U 'CCLK. iT Bar) m. \ H a ! 3£3£‘} I s 'im ■W- ■.. 'V ; •;.. V '■ " V- k-- :- in C-r yMa: hardship Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty f 0 \f ijL 'o UA d j,t'Y!.pAn ( TXC<g DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS . h(y.',no\\ Ctu.—e.ajf rffNKi^ # ^ - V » 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. (T) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. (4^ Certificate of survey. Plat Map. ;-h;7p'p'ucant and Property Owner sign this appUca^ that your variance appj ication is not complete if the anove inior been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide A"/s^'nd)orun^%^uaS" etp°eV^^^^ in review"ofms\"ppli^°^^^ that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. / 1 0 ( 1 r ^jJJ^. . /. Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this appli^and further authoT^zes ‘reasonable entry' onto the property by City sta». agents, commission members, and Council members for p pagents and verification of thi,i5 ^^eq Owner's signature O/yrtc^a Date Applicant must have all submittals into ^kc^^ky off ices 25 day^ Planing Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are nei Monday of each month. lA 10 -“58-4 Iti VI M lAM «mS8 “5 S«“SS2i I a M ^ ^ < 3H O 10 ^ HI M |L o Hi HI 3 ., U U < H O o «• UI _ W « a! a!e ui «> M e e < HI ^ % 88..SS2 p Him ^ «j «o in 10 CM I N I lO CM I H HI 1“Ot i I Hi HI 3 . . HI HI 10 10 H X3£ o HI HI ^ - -*- 5 I/I:i, w v» ^»« o .. (• e ae z ^ *N JC ^ S X |i. ** M MS ‘*iS!23 ^ O S A ^ ^ - S HI u Ik ^ s III lA •O CM Ih* 85 “i E88z M M MSS3 I iOlO -- **! 0 0-1 < HI -C &tt o 5 Ha H» ^ S r :) s o ^2 [W]O^.’ O o o » A A N i ...r „J -n tH r- S 5oCM ® ® * a — “K 8»53E8SzS8S m “?-lHI !< o ||S| e 1 1 iiu :^1 • w: • f •)* I1 ll-. ■t % - ■ . ? ■ -* % ■C?" I ‘ #^. / %■- M*"" /. ■t • ' HENNEPIN CCN. 4;:- A '-ii" ■ - ?; >.: ’ ' A;V .«r; r’-s ^ s,:'sjStexAAt • 'Asia^mmmm iai?.r;v;;> • :a .. <• •'. • '••< • ■:■ e>aVtoA'iA-:i AV^•.v ■' ,:■•!*: ..': :-ar?aa , •■■ ••,- . .. v-A.a.:. a'N.^V..- ■•;• •=■ ,;y i^yi:y.v.v V; i--a -: •i«mm . . '•.'. ,.y. , • .>: •.Av-y;-- •'••A^' ■A." A. ";• :-.-7A-./A.vi-.,: .. v ^ -:" T ;=" :\ ^ J v',S -I.jianfisasKO^ IHHiiI I ID 8 V =V“ 1 •v,»^ t t * ,HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST K--.:. ■.'■■■■,:. ■»..... 1 ..A,'./ . REPORT NO. PX43S401 PAGE 9 X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEMS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROTERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KN0NLED6E AND BELIEF. DATE is^': ■:;w-:% "-'f ilW: -y: ^'• • j-,V ;■;■■■""••■ ■■■ ■•. ■•* -■ . ' ■ ■ :/-y p:S'¥V^-\ .......................... - • ;:v;;v '■' -.Vy >4 ...... 1 yj-vi ^•’i. .- ■■'■■ *y:y'i.r' i ■', :■':y‘i • • .••••rfi ! 4 :4y »s.: :■ msm2m»: y y y :;3d Is^m BP* iSs?*; »ai iiii ‘..r lOli ■'i IS ■■*» ^ > < 1^ li vir EXHJB'T ff LJ^ .•M'<v/ ^tneof ^ £msi *A#/* Sfcficn ^•//T’*-?^ .V'‘ ;l...{.(f''' '>■ topographic survey tor PR. CPWTON c. BE“ 3 n NORTHEAST l/4 OF SECTION Scale: Ihte. t DE.t\sn: \n B 50' 5-21-74 Mebn Boa level ^L£>arb&3iA. <^?0 Maple. 'PlsiY^^S3£3 47r- % m ; t'. y- p" . "-.w - '..••••'"• TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJE Per S' Appli Adden Other List Exhifc Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Purpe The desi<m most plan largi plant The 0 the p to b>e pond fill crea^ spoi. wetl< out ' SjUHIP^’**'*** J AO ' ^5359 TO: FROM: DATE: SDBJBCT Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 17» 1984 #852 Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit + Variance Per Section 10.55 Subdivision 8, Section 10.03 Subdivision 19 Application - A conditional use permit and variance application required to excavate a wildlife pond and skating pond within a protected wetlands (wetland included in DNR inventory). Addendum to Application - Conditional use permit required for construction of concrete retaining wall (maximum height 10' ) located 55' from shoreline of Tanager Lake. Height of wall within protected area 2'-6'. Other permit applications required for alteration of wetland: 1. 2. 3. DNR permit - required by law MCWD permit - required by law Review by Hennepin Conservation District by City. - required List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's sketch - wetlands alteration DNR application Drainage easements designated on Dragonfly Hill plat Engineer's report Site plan - retaining wall Elevation of retaining wall Purpose The applicant proposes the excavation of two ponds within the designated wetland areas of his property (see Exhibit D and F). The most southern pond will function as a skating pond (measured from plan at 80' x 90' ). The wildlife pond has not been designated in the larger wetland—it would appear from the applicant's sketch that he plans to excavate the entire northern wetland. The OHM of the northern wetland has been designated at 927' elevation the plan must designate the area to be excavated, the amount of spoils to be removed and the slope ratio of the banks. Are the islands in the pond already there or are they to be created and if so with what kind of fill material? The spoils from the excavation cannot be used in the creation of the island areas. As with similar applications, the spoils must be placed a minimum of 50' from the edge of the designated wetland so that runoff will not wash nutrients back into wetlands and out to lake. #852 Gr Page 2 Lsion 19 application skating pond luded in DNR equired for 11 (maximum Manager Lake. -6*. wetland: t - required y Hill plat 5 within the > and F). The jred from site .gnated in the ketch that he M elevation— ount of spoils islands in the th what kind of be used in the ications, the ^he designated o wetlands and #852 Gregory Page 2 Review Criteria Puroose of Wetland - The northern wetland functions as ma^or retl^tion area for drainage covering from north providing with a final "clean up" before reaching main lake through The most southern wetland takes the overflow ^elow elevation. This kind of storagehigh assimilative capacities—providing during wet periods. How will application affect the wetland? Location of Wetland - We have no inf ormation as elevation watershed involved here, but the culvert at the 929 elevatio flows directly into Lake Minnetonka. Replacement Factor - As we have no dimension for the northern pond to^be created—we cannot determine the amount of area needed to replace the pond area that once provided assi^milative assure that the quality and quantity of the runoff leaving t property remains the same. This may also involve enlarging the defined protected area and amending the Conservation and Flowag easement filed against the property. Purpose of the Application - The purpose of the application is two fold? First, to create a wildlife pond—it would appear tlwt the area will provide good nesting and breeding areas for wildlife, second, to providl a decorative skating pond The P®nd will retain water at a controlled height but what of ^^® capacity. It would be ZERO as a skating pond. Is the applicant able to provide an equal replacement area? Options of Action Denial based on the following findings: 1. To deny the application finding the proposal in complete conflict with the true intent of the City's Ordinances. 2. Establish negative precedent for similar reviews. 3. The alterations proposed are two great and too extensive and would require major alterations of sensitive wetland areas. 4. Proximity to main lake—direct flow into Lake Minnetonka. these areas. 6. The building envelope and use of the property can continue without the proposed alterations. m. I 4 j l-f' m #852Pag€ Pari To a proi Tab; foi: 1. 2. 3. 4. Tab pon 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Dii Se< Co] lo< IS as major ding runoff igh culvert, ow the 932 nd has very al storage he wetland? size of the 9 elevation orthern pond sa needed to treatment to leaving the nlarging the I and Flowage ition is two ear that the r wildlife. i pond will ssimilative le applicant Lete conflict live and would :eas. inetonka. ally in the i or the use of itinue without 4. #852 Gregory Page 3 Partial Approval To approve only the excavation of a wildlife pond proposed skating pond out of a protected area. —suggest moving the Table the Application for wildlife pond pending receipt of the following information: 1. Defind boundaries of northern wetland on plan and pond's location. 2. Provide information on pond's construction maximum depth, slope of banks, amount of fill to be removed. 3 Determine high water level of pond. Provide proof that existing drainage easLents are still adequate; if not, conservation and flowage easement that will include new area. elevations of 930-932 have been altered—the wetland appears to have dried up—applicant should explain. Table the Application for the excavation of a wildlife pond and skating pond pending receipt of the following: 1. 1-4 above. 2. Designate suitable replacement area for skating location on plan and submit amended conservation and flowage easement over relocated wetland. 3. Erosion control plans—during construction and time frame for restoration of disturbed area. 4. Developers Agreement to assure completion of all "replacement areas as City has an interest in the defined wetlands areas. 5. Review and report on wildlife pond by Hennepin Conservation District. Second Part of Application Construction of concrete retaining wall within lakeshore yard located 55' from lakeshore. Setback variance required; Required = 75' Proposed = 55' Variance *= 20' or 27% #852 Page The a is on origj the g and c to SI The w koving the it of the nd* s )th, slope : existing ie amended new area. I. In the : the old ippears to nd skating d—provide nd flowage frame for ‘placement" ids areas. mservation lore yard — Mr #852 Gregory Page 4 A) Footage B) Cross Profile The aoDlicant was asked to include this item at the last minute. is one of the mtny changes or additions that have come up since the oriaiLl building permit and site plan review. The walkout design of the^arage has required the removal of the old timbered retaining wall and Cutting into of the adjacent bank. The retaining wall is required to support the steep bank and prevent further erosion. The wall (See Exhibit I) will be 45* in length beginning at ® of 10® and stepping down to a 2* height located 55* from the edge of the lake. staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Hay bales remain along the bottom of the disturbed bank until completion of the wall. 3. Payment to City for variance application of $100. 1 I ^ Id. l A Wt jv S? tH. P..S- f . \y ■ general land property locj site Add: Property Please c (for Cor Please a survey. applicant ^ ^ ■ Name Mailing OWNER Name Mailin Date P I Adol PEES - Coi Other Ap m mr ' minute. This i up since the kout design of retaining wall ill is required [ at a height of he edge of the conditions: bed bank until formation for the banks. applicant OF ORONOCEMERAI. iamb OSB^PUttTIOH property IX)CATI0N site Address-----l±l :ff O ^ property Identification Hun0.er (P.I.D.)property XOenn».... ^rorcofaltU! u'se^Uu-tiLs only , torrens? ^for conditional Use AppUcatxon Please attach legal description to appUcatxon survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •K, . . . .^Mbgb. Phone ^7^-9ot Mailing Address 7/37^ /V/T V>>y\\ PhoneOWNER Mailing Address pate property Acquired I (i,A (do not, also own the adjacent parce s F^r- ConditioMl Use Permxts %-9^V#VV %•# - - . 5100.00 b) institutional (church, school, e c 5100.00 c, fiUing) 5150.00 e, commercial/industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals other - see fee schedule \V, \t Ur-:-£§0M' w. • (over) -Vi present present U! description c Describe ■ ixred SUl Coroplct y2 Certify f r om He M 3^ Starope above The Appii that you: included m APPLICA# KOr -y*" ' The appl the Zoni in revic and cor Applies OHNERS The o% authox agents and v< owner Appl3 Plani Mond. ^ <♦ p DBSCRIPTIOH Describe r ticE OF PROPER^ PBBSBHT USB or present zoning Distric present Use of Property im'i- Residential other {specify! . _ , .4 ,«.a envelopes (♦ :ertif ied ^|°P«ou'n't?'Departn.ent of Pina«»= ^^e names on the S,«.p»!. wy,*” ,«»!• .'!««“• above li-sr ^ plat Map*6 Plat Map- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _VicaVion. Pleas* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ wne7must sign ^his apP^ information ;;;'i:;puca-complete rf that your applte _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Pieasc reme^r - has not been xpplicanfs signature ^ ^ ,nd further g,„ros SIGHX-nW® “9 ’'®®*nerty''by* cit? •'•«£- iXstiga"i ‘«Korebv acknowledges property r purposes of lu iSftUittS:*-.< «w ••r -5 ““ (, -pM Applicant^ro^^ggion Meeting. Fxa •nter the names on the se remember as not been !•* “'!2“,VS?«S Date ‘“Vr ris:” ■ Date oc*^*vs before theon the thirdare he NA-02622'02 Rev. 12/61 department o V NATURAL RESO h >■ Please read instruci Government Lot(s) • o Applicant's Name (Las' 'QRfGOiZy/C Address (Street^BPO. I MIO Fire No.. Box No. % Pi H. PROPOSED'PR ;□ drainJ^tic'Dcor □ remove p oth o abandon □ install nr. ESTIMATED phojeci IMEF EXrUIUTiaN OF TUM (Explaii % ENVlRONMEigAL MPAC ^tUtt •; •% *. ALTEMUTIVES (Other W • ..ihvtbTiMkeNipNc -vnlirtslinacoordm f *. ■ r- •■ «• • • V.V J -S.': and twomtobi day of NA-02622'02 Rev. 12/01 . . Ib^OEPARTMfNT OF )^(7^tEsoir^ ^ NATURAL RESOURCES ame (i K.Y Government Lot(s) V 4 w. tsTumto mojOT COST 5coo~fc.MoeO MHEF CXnAMTMW OF nOJECT 4 USE A TYPEWRITER OR A B All POINT Win WH lN COWrLtl INC Irufwi ir luu Aitc mm i inu. . r»».u wwi owwi** - :• i*: ..A ^ :U:<S PERMIT APPUMTION TO WORK M raOTECTa WATERS SR WETU•• (WGUI0M6 DM SAFETTI. p- ► Please read instructions belore attempting to complete this application.^'^ . flfiEfUSE ONLY. ■ f J I ^ cpimwc;^: v.rv *? ** * Authorized Agent (lfappIicabW_Jj| j Y OF'-f 'Vv LO^^: W- 5539 f Quarter Section(s) Sections(s ^f)Ur Range(s Lot, Block. Sub-Division County A-?.. Project wHI aWeet Lake, Wetland orJ/V^cw^ V-H r (name & number.^-- 41 knowni-*-^^--^ PROPOSED^PROJECT-r^yT^v^’* /• :□ drainj^C'D construct » \ □ remove i~t D other (specify) O abandon " ‘ ■ □ install •-* »: * - ' -TV . vr: -. •. * v.v , *r r - ir ^ IM. PROJECT AREA ^ani^,-r --j; *i>•■ K -i*-*^*- □ lake □ wharf ■ T'_____-, . .- I I »------mm »wm ■—— ■ i ■— □ bridge ’**r^ obstruction V' □ harbor □ watercourse t ^ ... □ riprap D sand blanket □ channel □ permanent dock ; * ?* - . ; . -1- V . > *♦,\ ■ O'" » /o " **, ZnoAjfs A OAV .• V A 4^*. ; Q ,«■ -• inCITION (Explain why this project is needed-----------------A A .i ENYIROmimM. IMPACT (^ticipaM aji imRoidable but dettimental Affect^ W/Tii i»jh angps to the water ag^g|^e|^land^w^ r * -*# ^ • . . . ij. - • V V^v* i'.^V -•• .• -'■ • • •- •v--‘.:r^ «•' .•: •:v,^^ -ik ^ .• ALTEIWATIVES (Other alternatives to the action proposed) ^wirwUL-. V #me: ________________________ twraby BMicawoHcaUoii pwxuant to Mhw L imilarts) in accvdanca with all supportiRg i rM-‘r* Slitutas Chaplw 105.42 and all suppoding fiilas for a permit to wQrtc in V allacMhe above namad praladad _ ^ ^ __R_«_____»• —..R. lAA^u ‘ oA !■ Tw* wiIjMM wir A wvi1Mm4 wnH wtstAMimfifw hrsi A a : ee:;5is^?s^,’•rev- T.i I ^ .. .*.. .^. j«j > « »1IWI • ' : ; Distribution!'r:'.--•... V-r ^.v-- -v--vwiMonr jIA m ^AmfORir^mfR Blue: SWCD • • • • _•_ * w •.-•-•». • 3oHS4>t^ 2SS5 W. *1^ St. PmtU, PUm».6f2-6S August i city of Box 66 Crystal Attn: Mr Re: Filr Gre{ Dear Jei We have there ii 1. 1 2. 3. If you Yours V BONESTB Glenn H GRC:li 2559c IT ALL COPIES CAN BE READ. €tUSE ONLY.•V. •■II .1-111Jlf V »ligi 55<? I - ' :*> i4 V- Lot, Block, Sub-Division t U^. p . • '.f r^T! otection'v* pecify)' ii:\ T-V>-* V "L uj^e but detrimental effects) ..... drs- • - . • ir.' ^ : • ■ * \'v- - - •-•V: ’ -M-fc :iX XV .. ..'^ '.V ‘■- .r* ••»-• >’ x-i•«'■<: « » ’ei*. ionttfbmiBidand ition‘‘ *3^' •• • ••^■"-4; 81 m; SWCOm 1 t- • ■ "• ?■- •> y.i. ■'*'/k \- ^4'- ■■y' :,V4 1 • 'T 4 : 'K It ^ d% 1: &OH€>ihoa, Ro4mh^, ^HtU^Uih A Ai40C4aiM^, One,OoHUtUina CnqitfU MS9 W* ^^mmk Jtifkmmf 36 Si> SSH3 6f^*636*3600 Otto C. Bonestroo, P,E. Hobert W, Bosene, P.E. JoMeph C, AmderUk, P.E, Brodford A. Lemberg, P.E, Bkhard E. Torner, P.E, domes C. Oisott, P.E. ip®lM-l,I August 6, 1984 1 MA ' .rib-* 71334 Cknn B. Cook, P.E. BeilhA. Cordon, P.E Thomm E. Noyes, P.E Bkherd W. Foster, P.E. Bobert C. Scknnkbt, P.E. Mervin L. Sorroie, P.E. Donetd C. Bnrgerdt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mork A. Henson, P.E. TedK. Field, P.E. Mkhoel T. Beotmnnn, P.E. Bobert B. PfeffHie, P.E. Oevid Loskote, P.E. Ckerles A. Erkkson Leo M. Pewelsky HeHen M. Olson I t j i-*^ «Kt •mrnrnti.^ City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 : t;iiV t‘r f40KQ Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-852 Gregory Dear Jeanne, We have made a preliminary review of the Gregory application and feel that there is not adequate information for review. 1. Define existing wetlands area. 2. Provide existing and proposed elevations for grading (2 countours;. 3. Define drainage area and discharge point. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li 2553c » y . ■ :-. tm.V- . . r »r S- * > . . A»/-, ^ 1 • -^- vJSiC> , •''‘V- S'^ i* ^ j: v '•VA - lai / J • ■'• :'■<A" r ’ ' • i-' tS^^SS s ®ii -r-S:mi X •; *- 5 He“ > v; vv2^,r.^;2JKy^ . '. -•;■• -^vrVrA/'sS* -■•W I * . rS'> ‘^ j»^-«)i v¥mmmm ■"M> em a; TO: FROM: DATE: SOBJBCl Applica List ol Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit This X ("plan* lakesht withou- A short 101.4 Dredgi applic frame Early t the ap constr reveal CUtr T diamet larger owner percer of ere Retail The ov requii on the would plant! The St Note 1 Fageri f*, ..'.•• •• ••• •'■•••»•••■*•■•.••/•'•••• *• V. * ;•••.■’••••f > ; • •! ; .'• 1 I ■ 4:*. . .••/••.f-.v;*.■•i^ ^'«yvi:OT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning CommissionMichael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator August 10» 1984 #854 G. Robert Johnson, Conditional use Permit 1981 Fagerness Point Road After-the-fact Application - Conditional Use Permit to construct retaining walls within 75* of the lakeshore List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map List of Property Owners Survey Submitted Plans Submitted This is an after-the-fact application to place ffta^^i"? ("olanters" according to the applicant) and steps within 75 of the iakesSo^! Th^walls and steps are in place now and were constructed without City review or permits. A short synopsis of this project follows: The City issued a 101.4 feet of rip-rapping 1983^ TheDredaina Company for this address on September 22, 1983. ine application noted only 30* would be rip rapped at this time, no time frame stated for completion of the rest. Early this summer staff was notified by a Planning the aooarent violations of tree cutting within 75* of the laxe ana construction otretaining walls. Staff • s subsequent investigation revealed 2-24"+ stumps which appeared to be y5-2" cut must have been dead trees. No stumps greater than 1/2 2 diameter were apparent on the slope. Thelarger trees were cut and stumps removed at the crest of the hill. Tne ownir states that only small brush was removed from the J to "see what was there". As of today there appears to be roughly 50 percent cover again established over the slope. There is no evidence of erosion of the slope occurring. Retaining walls ("planters") and steps had also been constructed. The owner stated that he had been told by his contractors that all required permits had been obtained, ^h® retaining walls are located on the approximate center of the shoreline, made of 6 timbers, would estimate the hardcover at about 250 sf including steps and tops of nianter timbers, or about 3 percent in the 0-75 zone.planter timbers, or about 3 percent in the 0-75 The steps are obviously necessary in order to have access 1 Note however that this property also has a large dock southeast of Fagerness Point Road with relatively level lake access. No evilareneconstipercer seems• of the has gi and to plants others reteni saturc The Ci the o^ repori The rd erosi< was dc Staff stabi; recomi reviei Btrator t Road - aining walls ining walls I 75* of the constructed Bd a permit for anka Portable I, 1983. The time* no time ion member of the lake and nvestigation i if recently than 1/2-2" I whether any he hill. The .opes in order be roughly 50 IS no evidence n constructed, ctors that all Lis are located 6” timbers. I beps and tops of ne. tss to the dock.. ;k southeast of !ess. ^4 M 4 I No evidence has been presented to indicate whether the retaining walls are necessary to stabilize the bankr or whether they are desired constructed for that purpose. I measured the slope at about 70 percent (19* of drop in a 28* run) which without some stabilization seems quite precarious. The submitted plans do not indicate the depth of the walls or how they are anchored into the hillside. The applicant has give me the impression that these walls are for aesthetic purposes and to help stabilize the stairway and not necessarily the hill. The planter terraces may have some benefit in slowing runoff which otherwise would run right down the hill. On the other handr will retention and absorption of this runoff in^ the planter boxes cause saturation of the slope and possible sliding? The City Engineer has reviewed the plan presented and recommends^ that the owner substantiate the stability of the slope by submitting a report and recommendation from a qualified soils engineer. The rip-rapping done in 1983 appears to have been necessary to stop erosion and undercutting of the banks. Approximately 30* of rip—rap was done, but the remainder appears to be needed as soon as possible. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to submit the bank stability information as recommended by the Engineer. Your recommendation for approval or denial could be conditional on staff review of this information, or you could table the application. I GENERALmm mm m PROPERTY Sit< Pro Pie (fo Pie sui APPLia Nar Ma: OWNER Na Ma Da I FEES Othei ning walls isigned and : about 70 bilization e the depth i applicant .c purposes hill. The loff which handr will oxes cause ninends that bmitting a er. ary to stop of rip-rap a possible. Lt the bank leer. Your al on staff Lication. CITY OP ORONOapplication _ _ _ _ _GENERAL LAND USE property location Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) •.IB.5.,4 Please check one — Is the property abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only)iror w-..- —r-sr— , 1 if not included on required Please attach legal description to application survey. APPLICAHT Name Mailing Address Phone 'i y/ - 2?r OWNER Name /fS— Mailing Address Date Property Acquired I (do not) also o' Phone '/£Z (month/year) FEES - Conditional Use Permits )(a) Residential Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) 5X00.00 c) ^Pj«*i^'^lil^S“|rading, filling) $150.00 e) Commercial/Industrial Use PrD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule (over) O^^pi^BNT USEPresent Present description Describ ■■■■■ The applic the Zoning in review < and corre Applicant OHMERS.SI The owhei ' authorize agents* c and verif Owner's £ Applicani Planning Monday oi >/9TA SS3W ^ torrens? included on required cfw/ sar) and. :c) 1271964 OF ORONO ■HWIIIittia USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) description op request Describe request in detail; ^ if^iyr’rnr REQ<IIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form.- - - - - - fromHenfepiXunt^D^^^^^^^ 3. rrom nennct»xii ^ww».wj ---------- Sta«.ped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the “ibove list with no return address. y A^^^^rtificate of survey. 5. Construction plans» if applicable Plat Map. included. APPLICANT'S SIGNAIURE The applicant hereby agrees to f ees°ai^^^ incurred Applicant's signature ONMERS;SIGNATURE Date 1 ct?f it“.f £? c^Vlt^ntt! ♦ 4..f>. 'a , #• '*•4 ■ aV ^^^sVs" oV ii^isiig.tion and verification of.this request. ^ . 7/i?//y Owner 's signature n of this request, y xe Date ali'sutoittals into the City offices 25 days ore the ■pUnning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the thirdApplicant must have Planning Commission Monday of each month r “ * ** *** ' ^ ^ ^ ‘ .:'V -■ •':>.. IliPgligilligiigPII^^ can obtc'ln this list mt Center 348-3271) :h of the names on the >n. Please remember mation has not been aired or requested by jal expenses incurred ition supplied is true Date sation and further taff # consultants, es of investigation Date 7/10 /^v es 25 days before the }s are held on the third USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form c/bi hsm I'-*' 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 * (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A—603 Government Center 348—3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the bove list with no return address. ^7 4. ^pertificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. \ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. MM mm mm mm Mm mm mm mm mm »m mm mm mm mm MM mm mm him mb MM mm ^^b ^^b APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnpwledge. Applicant's signature c i;OWNERS. SIGNATURE i • iis/ner K|[xowieage Date • • The ovmer hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further . authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of.this request, j Owner's signature Date 7/6?/>y Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. '7 ‘V-'* !7e^ ;an obtain this list nt Center 348-3271) h of the names on the i. Please remember lation has not been Lred or requested by il expenses incurred ion supplied is true Date t/jO Js*:/ cation and further itaf£ t consultants r es of investigation tete 25 days before the are held on the third 'I : ii \\ t rv^* fi n-ii i'CPO'm..n ——------------ ,, • I { , I JIL2 7I984 F ORONO • • 1 ‘ ' * *>\ »s‘:T;. !»:*;>is Mi i •1 y~ i' t: ■ 1 * ' --r r - :! -*-n ; e i •H V// ^ • • exhibitoCe.y^ \ * t « "y" >- ^ y Tfe ”2^ 4p^o-<y^ y^-'u-^y /JWrVS^:*^ TS'-ZS?' /tifc«:.o«><^ ^,<(>-4^ s, M • lAl CPs Ks IIIoc 5 &; Si sHK Ss I*o ^'IK so. I IM SeS^ M UJ SSE « 10 > -S' ss> I CD ^N < c^ U. M ttl M •s; CO r CO M Ul UI Z & Ul O P M U. Ch M S e z IP2s .olS!:C 0 ^ s ¥% tt CM Ul I CD h* < ^ u. \ IS^9 $5Sip ^ M M 9t O ft ft 8 ^ sMM ftS S3 UJ PI -i ft •< |M K > mI*-? M Ul N O • P M 5 9 "sg: So o 3 ft Ul11 J r-'v ' S « M kU SS| ® ill® (!) > r 8S« I p oa M ^ p C^ & VO in p inr PM UlIII z ^ IL. M •M Ul ^ £ Stno ? M ESiO P s s H lu H z m N3§| (0-SStt. ^ ^ »SSS2S S s UJ|S ”*|^uiM(nif) 10 tt -j Pvaisas,tssasi “III S o s Si p Ml K« S ^ fio p |i|| B P B ZS p ) 4ss s ^ pUlzVO K eg ul CL VO in p m _ PUl Ul I o Ul H zrPI as P IL H 5 N tiO H -Iss (ft J «» (0 S fa H _ Z Ul ex s m »2 in inig Ul ► >• w in r55|i milO 1 ♦ ^ 5 ^ S|U Ul P 2 3*iO _ M Ul I P < g !9 !?p in Ul m P Ul 3 X ^ 8251 *-sai llsloc o^ KS P »4 oe ss 2 P in p ^ p ^ ^ •i^ Ul H HZ P Pp B M M eg Ul I P z-ililV P ex ^ p PS^ P Ul Ul ^ P^ III p ??2S33$S ^ 53SS ^ p oIII z _ p >• ^ :?p-jactS 4* p 5^5^ III lu 4 P Z U P P tn B u P eg p N p I p p P « I p_ p p H -§“vinJ5 RsilSi I Z M & w 9:IIB tXHIBIT P ml I 8 P P O Z < e-e B ^ M h- P ^ £"-6 ''^8S«r»8 P B M P PP B M P •I lU < < -J It- H-s5ri-a 8S^8SS 8 88 BOc ir» ^ ZP ^ Z B Z K P P P I f J V- : '* • . -I»**-•; •?/!?% vi*^--V- *<’ ^. •. •• • :':■ *• «• ** . •y* ■ •r • i ■ / • ^ •V*: '• * # m H 1^ r-I M A ^ Vr*4 • «2.*^ ^ •• ^ ^ ^ \^. • ; . w • v\ 4.t • 4 *> . . *’*.^ .-. i:■''vV-; >j -f •- - V i A ,* • <ir 'A?* • #. « .- 4 » ' - * J• < .Orono Pie August 1‘ Page 2 Review St Planning The sket< directioi Planning In j the Intel the local property regarding tOrono Planning Commission August 15, 1984 Page 2 Review Section 10.32 - PRD - specifically sections 1, 2 and 3 before Planning Commission makes a recommendation on the density issue. The sketch plan application will be brought before the Council for direction only on the question of the proposed density. Planning Commission - Conceptual Direction In review of the existing pattern of neighborhood development, the intent of the LR-IB zoning district, the general welfare of the local community and the unique physical features of the subject property. Planning Commission make the following recommendation regarding the PRD development of this property; I.a) b) Use of 1 form of density credit, or Both forms of density credit may be applied in the development of the property. II.Approval of variance of .62 acre for 1 single unit. Review section 10.08 subdivision 3(A) for necessary finding and hardships. Denial of variance of .62 acre for 1 single unit based on following findings; 1. negative precedent established for future applications 2. too severe a variance 3. .38 per unit not consistent with surrounding Kelly Avenue development. CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APP APPLICANT Name Mail! property Name OWNER Maili (Atta and 1 before :y issue. :ouncil for Jevelopment# Lfare of the subject nendation in the le unit, ecessary unit based re applications nding Kelly Date Itec'd 5r Rv X^/i \nr^CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICAT Ji irs ^,#<800 applicant Name Choice Wood Company t ^ Minn 1©@«6-l /A/1 ' 00 Mailing Address 5019 Wentworth Ave. So.. Minneapolis, HH 55W PROPERTY Name First Kational Bank of the tokes Telephone OWNER WavcHre . MNMailing Ai^aress J\avarre, iin (Attach iir*: if more than one) (property on Kelly Ave. sj property LOCATIOi; street Accross Property identification No. (P.I.D.) . ^7.??^ ^^^22- - - Complete Legal Description to be attached to EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 1 Development Size 2.65 1.75 4.58 Acres Dry Land . Acres Wet Land (Drainage casement; Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (chec)c)Residential; no. of units n- other (specify) undevelop^ Present Zoning'District 1_B PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) y Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per 4.58 Acres Minimum Lot Site: 45 X 100 Square Feet Dry Buildable remainder of land is PRD common Land . . . . . . . - area Proposed uses (check) - - - Sthtr^^USclfy) iferrt,'A 1.1 .• »r MINIMUM MATE1. Applicat2. Prelimin 3.Certifie obtained Center 2 4.Stamped, above li Certificatic complete. Zoning 0ffi< MINIMUM MAT] 1. Payment 2. Signed 3. Title o] 4. Easemen 5. Develop Certificati Zoning Offi FEES XX Applicant hi or requestei Commission to pay all Applicant'f Owner's Sic Applicant i Planning Co Monday of < c'd ^ Ipfw!^9H .s, MN ^3419 471-0111 on Kelly Ave. t r.ddress ^ cation ige Easement) (is lits ;-elop^ ing sitesy Acres Dry Buildable # « l£y) . • # V . ' 'ilO i i-T-' •i V . • ^ V ' t L'l* tea MIHIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION1. Application Completed2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. • rtf nwn6ITs wittixn 350* (this list can be C^rtyV;a"r\™\nt *01 Finance A-603 Covernn.ent Center 348-3271) 4, Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Date Zoning Officials Signature - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MMIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3, Title opinion. 4, Easementsr Covenants# etc. 5, Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - FEES XX Sketch Plan Review (Class I# II fc III) Preliminary Review (Class I fc II Subdivisions) $100.00 $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) t-AO.OO plus 0.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $100.00* a Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide p?2Sning or requested by the Zoning Administrator# City Engineer# y fny^hAr aorees commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signacure Owner's Signature _ _ TH.c 0\'Ju.Date Date St have all submittals into the City offices 25 days ^e aission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third ch month. m , j' •'■. 81;1/27/8 /\ ( '■ city of ORONO resolution of the city council 1258NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT pP ORONO HILLS t. . of land within the City? and WHEREAS, the City a subdivision plat by David J. Delaney, the subaiviae A I WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platti^^latilns of the City, including: Dedication of drainage and utility easements 3.Dedication to the City of ^ f (Exhibit A) providing ISd shoS^ on theand/or drainageways described therein ana s„o™ i„ae plat as -drainage easements". .P;i^,:^^^Sr"vewav aT- - Kerir*yy»u°"”°^^° ' n I M thr *he residential proper^ 4.Execution of a yQgg ”'a^"o®feet%ide^erro area residential property ?s:Ja‘:;.Krs 6. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication fee in the amount of $870#00e ’• ;urs s.'5^si;?.r« PAGE OF k„: t. V Qk4AU^ DELANEY after c Orono, laws of sum of hereby the ric the us€ covenar County as fol P 1 c< s o d b o corporation >f Minnesota; and Drono has adopted rtd safe development the application for der; and , requirements of isements • t way for public >ad No. 19* Conservation Easement n the use of wetlands ,nd shown on the oment will exclude driveway at. iroe the residential iHce easement •et wide berm area le bank site and >f shed and barn I dividing line. ation fee in the dministrative review 1/27/ttl f- FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGES THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this — day of . 1981, by and between DAVID J. DELANEY and RUTH H. DELANEY, his wife, their heirs, assigns and successors (herein after collectively referred to as the Grantor[s]) and the City of Orono, its successors and assigns, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as Grantee). WITNESSETH, Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict and Grantor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the following described land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota; That portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Orono Hills lying Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel to and 60 feet at a right angle angle from the South easterly line of said Lot 2, which is subject to the drainage easement as dedicated on the plat of said Orono Hills. as follows: 1. Grantor(s) hereby covenant and agree; A. No structures shall be constructed, erected or placed upon, above, or beneath the Land including without limitation, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers, hard cover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other • * structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. I B. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by written consent of Grantee. ■'m. ' I li J ^ - i 4 day of RUTH H. lierein- e City of on under the as Grantee). n of the nsideration. rantee preclude ns and in the acted or without 5, hard- her ural state hall be authorized .'S?r u > ■n i % M s» r C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance of material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or garbage shall be placed. dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics shall « be made of the Land or the water situated thereon. F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability g^fiy structures, uses, materials, substances or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. 2. Grantor(s) hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantor(s) herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of »this agreement. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. im r % ■k f ivi m interest wise, ex( extend tc or assign STATE OF COUNTY OF Notary Pu appeared known to going ins ment as t THIS INST J. Robert DORSEY, W WHITNEY 2300 Firs Minneapol any othet moved from ion of any of the Land ce of ored upon laced. it uses, if mdition of le drainage, L, soil .sties shall le purposes itained herein iny liability latural herein and and convey privilege Land. se, acquit its officers or causes of e or accrue i terms of iay have, e enforced by ■’A PS i ' ! ..Vi mm ■s. V ff:: ^W i m •v: ..■-.r r^wj j >-i] % ft t r it -yt> /. Grantor(s) do not intend that.the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or other wise, except as hereinabove set forth. The Grantor(s) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances, except: subject to the restrictive covenants contained in instruments filed as Document No. 3697134 in the office of the County Recorder and as Document No. 1163719 in the office of the Registrar of Titles, and an underground utility easement and restriction running to the Village of Orono filed as Document No. 3449578 in the office of the County Recorder. All the provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. Ruth H. Delan^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 3S COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this “^6^^ day of ci-nu^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Notary Public within and for said County and State, personally appeared DAVID J. DELANEY and RUTH H. DELANEY, his wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the fore going instrument, and acknowledged that they executed said instru ment as their own free act and deed. 1981, before me, a No Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: J. Robert Hibbs DORSEY, WINDHORST, HANNAFORD, WHITNEY & HALLADAY 2300 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 NOTARY PUBIIC-MINNESOTA hennapin county MV Ct<MMI»ltieN ■kPIMC* JUNC •, I MS mm Mm. m:" <•5 • ll n M • f m 'ti 1^. Shac of on How a Minr together to called hom( ^hat does a £amil and a desire for a do these days? Rea< ander's A Pattern understanding arch special house. Th; Bruce and Sharmair Bear Lake approaci conundrum. To be sure, the Jc pursuit of a house conceptions about first-time bu\'ers. A ^ housing led them guage, a book by i orist Christopher A the second volumt ander (see related lication excerpts fi Production of Hot guage' for plannin pattern in the la 42 ARCHITECTURE MiNN have any oth ’er- in tents Recorder r of on running the office d and shall grantees / ■ me, a nally to me fore- d instru R 3TA iw m-v‘ ' ■fc IS. i •> i b a <£.J I I? '■ v.«- <3 W. ,Jl----1: iippapii S^^EihE . w.V *./^ Shaping a home of one’s own How a Minnesota family and architect worked together to build that special place called home ^hai does a family with a low budget and a desire for an individual house do these davs? Read Christopher Alex ander's A Pattern Language, find an understanding archiiea and build that special house. That, at least, is how Bruce and Sharmainejohanson of White Bear Lake approached today ’s housing conundrum. To be sure, the Johaasons began their pursuit of a house with stronger pre conceptions about design than most first-time buwrs. A N’ear of reading about housing led them' to A Pattern Lan guage, a book by the architeaural the orist Christopher Alexander. The book, the second volume of a series by Alex ander (see related article for pre-pub lication excerpts from his volume 77je Production of Houses ) provides a lan guage” for planning and building. Each pattern in the language describes a 48 architecture MINNESOTA s; > ' t. *!C I I V -"• 4l V' T'-r '•. ■ •'V , ' '■ ;, ; c- :> -• M. ,.■k ' specific design problem in an environ ment and offers a variew of solutions.For instance, the pattern for a farmhouse kitchen describes a focal point in the house where many individual aaivities are accommodated. Choos ing that pattern determines the central place of the kitchen in the house as a whole. . The patterns —253 in all—can be combined to form infinitely different but equallv meaningful entities, just as words are used to create sentences. What A Pattern Language does is de- mN-stifi' the steps architects go through; it makes the process of design acces sible to laymen. And that, indeed, is precisely what the lohansons wanted—to be involved in the design of their owti house. Firmlv committed to Alexander s pattern language, the Johansons faced the next challenge; how to find an ar- chitea who could help them apply Alexander ’s approach as the\' built their own house. The>’ proceeded most straightfor- w’ardly. They called architeaural firms and a^ed if they knew of A Pattern Language. Failing to find any that did, the>’ contaaed Alexander ’s Center for Environmental Struaure in Berkeley, California and asked for advice. Sara Ishikawa, a colleague of Alexander ^ recommended Dale Mulfinger and Sarah Susanka, Twin Cities architects she had met at a conference. The Johansons took the advice and found in Mulfinger and Susanka two young architects who not only kne^' Alexander ’s approach but were enthu siastic about applying it to an aaual design process. Susanka had been thoroughly steep>ed in the principles of A Pattern Language in architecture school at the Universitt' of Oregon and had applied those principles in her early design projects. Mulfinger had used Alexander ’s work in teaching architec ture. The Johanson house presented the first opportunity for the two of them to "do a pattern house ” together. By the time the Johansons met wim the architects, they had a long want list devised from their study of the book. "We spent an entire day together and developed the design from the inside out,” says Susanka. "The very seleaion of patterns personalized the design.” "Using the pattern language,” sdys Susanka, "involves the person who is going to live there much more inti- maidy in planning the house. The ar chitects help, rather th^ just present ing the fiunily with a design.” And, since Bruce Johanson also sawed beams and pounded nails, building this family home was—from start to finish —a hands-on experience. A . t vT* *'^» H k: , I ^ i > i1 M- Ii ^ f i: ■ t. . IW quiet work Middle Level Diem in an environ- rarien ’ of solutions. Danern for a farm- :ribes a focal point re many individual mmodated. Choos- ermines the central n in the house as a J53 in all —can be \ infinitely different agful entities, just as o create sentences. mgt4age does is de- rchiteas go through; ess of design acces- *d, is precisely what jied—to be involved leir o^Ti house, tted to Alexander ’s the Johansons faced e: how to find an ar id help them apply ach as the\' built their ed most straightfor- ed architeaural firms i’ knew of A Pattern to find any that did, rxander ’s Center for •uaure in Berkeley', ted for advice. Sara igue of Alexander ’s, >ale Mulfinger and jvin Cities architects conference, took the advice and er and Susanka two who not only knew' >ach but were enthu- iying it to an actual Susanka had been ed in the principles \uag/e in architecture /ersiw of Oregon and prifKaples in her early Mulfinger had used : in teaching architec- x)n house presented iiy for the two of them house” together, e Johansons met with zy had a long want list :ir study of the book. Hire day together and esign from the inside a. ‘The very seleaion Dnalized the design.” mem language,” sa>;s Ives the person who is there much more inti* ning the house. 'The ar- *a^r than just present- vith a design.” And, since n also sawed beams and s, building this family rom Stan to finish—a “rience. m W: r;ffm quiet work [ T ■mooE TO HAomcc p iiii/i quiet work kids play ■-1 FARM KITCHEN AT THE HEART I n music & friends tea time t air & light Middle Level An affordable^ yet individual- placeWhen the Joheneone sat down with arehitsets Dale Mulingar and Sarah Su« aanka to daaign together a “pWWm housoT’ the firat atop weato dovalop a form for the house appropriate to the northam environment. "Cold ellmatoa tend to produce pure form build* mga,” aaya Mulfinger. “Wo needed to create a frugal vol* uma that would minimizo surface parimetar. TaMng tha thicknasa of energy efficient waSa and coat into account, the Ideal volume Is a cube. The architect and client woriked together to arrange spaces within the cube to achieve those special rela* thmahips that mean home. Fhal and foremost, the Jo* hansons chose the pattern for the farmhouse kitchen. They wanted the kitchen to be ine heart of thair home— and it is. From the big sunny kitchen the children's play* room, family room and porch radMe (see sketch and plan, left). Each room is dalino* ated by a partial wall or ehaigo In ceiling height, but all open to the Mtchen. Wtthin each room, smaller areas for spoclal actlvHloa further define the space: a breakfast nook in the kitchan; an alcove and open fireplace In the family room; a special loft in the children's ^%iowrthe Mtchen Is the couple's bedroom or adult realm, and next to It tho chit* dren's rooms. As the chll* dran grow older, the upper level, now a “contemplation loll.'* may become tho cou* ple’a realm. The children's realm will expand on tho lower level, and the play area next to tho kitchen will be come more of a den. "A house should change as the famfiy grows and changes,'' says Susanka. “It should have flexiblo spaces which can shift use as the charac ter of the family shifts.'' "Tho pattern house is in dividual says Susanka. “The spaces fit the Johansen's particular style. Architect- designed homes have al ways provkf^ individuality. But W9 should be able to of fer something to those who canT afford to pay enormous__•___ Tho Johansen house. In contrast, was built most fru- galy. Its simple floor plan mkwmlzod cost, but cantil- averad nooks and alcoves add imaresL Wood floors and doom wera salvaged, but give a euetom-made look. Super- Inaulatlon, southern expo sure and a wood burning stove insure Inexpensive warmth. The total cost of building: $75,000. MAY/JUNE 1984 43 I »ffordaWe —C individual^ ice »n th« Johanton* aat an with architacta Data iMngar and Sarah Su* *a to daaign tooathar a item houaa;'tha first stop a to davalop a form for tha aaa appropriata to tha Ilham anvironmant. 'Cold ellmataa tand to oduca pura form build* M.” aaya Mulfingar. “Wa adad to craata afrugal vol* na that would mlnimiza rfaca parlmatar. TaMng tha ieknaaa of anargy afficlant m and coat Into account, t Waal volume la a cuba." Tha architect and client Mkad together to arrange wcea within tha cuba to Mava thoaa special rala* mahlpa that mean home, rat and foremost, tha Jo* moons choaa tha pattern IT die farmhouse kltchan. My wanted tha kltchan to a me heart of thair home — nd it Is. From tha big sunny Rchan tha chlldran^s play* Mm, family room and porch idMa (sea sketch and plan, III). Each room la dallna* lad bv a partial wall or hanga'in calling height, but H span to tha Idtchan. Within each room, smaller irsaa for special activltlas urtwr define tha apace: a Nsakfaal nook In tha kitehan: maleova and opan fireplace me family room; a special CMI loft in tha chlldran ’a ilwarai Mow___tha Wtehan la tha upla's bedroom or adult SmTand nest to It tha chil* m'a rooms. As tha chil* m grow okfar, tha upper ml, now a “contemplation V* may bacoma tha cou* I's realm. Tha childran’s aim will expand on tha aar level, and <_______—tha play ixl to tha kltchan will Msa more of a dan ...uaa should change as tha lamiy grows and change) says Suaanka. “It should have fiaxlWa spaces which can shift use as tha charac* tar at tha family shifts.” "Tha patlam house la in* dMduar says Suaanka. “Tha spaces fit tha Johanson ’s particular style. Architect* daaignad homes have al* ways provMad individuality, •ulwa should be able to of* far something to thoaa who can! afford to pay enormous Tha Johanson house. In coPbast, was built most fru* gamr. Ns sknpla floor plan mkJmlwd coat, but cantll* nooks and aicovaa aal vagad,butglva nada look. Supar* Inaalotlon, southam expo* aura and a wood burning stave Insure Inaxpanslva srarmth. Tha total cost of buNdIng: S75.000. MAY/JUNE 1984 43 m m % mm H £u 9 ^ •• Immm r 4 ’ r/ ' m - , £ % 1: X*o 0» m£III-• sS os? u £ «: II ac c lit c f m c e £ CkC s . £.1 I|i0| If « Ss8r|S fi £ !k V * V ac 1u li h t « 2 a H 2^5 o£ Q 4> £ C *o a O I- 1:^1 9 ^ ^ S * £ g lip 0^0 — e -o ® C opiK;i o c££ ^ tr *3 k a a. o £ a £ IS|£=& i2 A» 0£ «= > C ^ c ^ 41 O IQ O V u M c m SeiilMl n C p IS ^ S ee96 9f t 0 wc 1 £ T3e < i2 -O 4, ww ^ ^ 41 |S SS = E o S a a|“» f. s lean •• rfi zl % '4 « a 96 C _ w c £ p 1*1*8 s|t|i O g£^£liltl ^ ^ a cm — M - ^ S ® cf hi m IQ £ m-w£ c piC 4) CD |Si s ££» I * n U) p » £ » Ib «1I £ 9 n m a m srs £*£ H e H «r- s 11» €I c ‘gr ^£J ‘i -3.’ w ’ V .riX . • w ■wl• : A .Iv'i I I fe >» JCI II g s « e e £ V 4) 41 — <2 x: 8 >»C ” I’i- t|ll £4s illisl ^ i frg-ti K £m « CoeHiU i I « m Z c III I |!f| 4i O ^ C K x: « 41 Ilifliiiflilll £ 41 m 11 l| Zz Hlilf£ o «. *0I«X. X i. P ^ ^ 2 ® oc o iB 2 s «fi pm s E 41 C t 41 fit? ^. A ^ e HI?uf^ lift JiMinfil &SS itHil.. S-5|32fcS HitlsiL % 4»‘ S « aS T? E 8 I lllllll llfisj; I itali!iHiilf! I >em ?|4|l8| Ssl'fS 1 12 sa ••1 a 2 II .•L‘'rV ■ h 11 e fi ’V £ c £ € ^"Sfsg &s ®s : -I I; C tc e ££ i!fc^c s uirp 7 9 E 8 c o »<fl S£ S S.s« rg Es s *ok.t® og-Sf s CP CP>.s If Si *= c o H 4)£«C^4>^C 9 =: . ‘j: ^ c o ol=s|!sig: *|S®|||eii & £ 9 O U o s V fUs®||g|i £^9iccDCPaP£ «» *1 Eli!?? E8C t* 1® f* IP ^ .fitlii— Pt c — ^ c— 4« W o K 10 > 8| eliisSSs i®S|i||i i|ll|llimu ®- £ g lol 2111 HIes » 2^8 • • .«•• a.“s~.e« k w £ S » S c 1 » O t3 8i|« as I E O'* ^ £ E 2 •»I : CL I 2 E ei u £s s • Ig s * Ea « ^ « 2 -** c £ S8§Siill>:||5-ig®\n c e •® £ t 8 § 8 = |S8<05 a:K & j : S « s 1:1 ill Oc c E pc , 1^1 I- « 5 8 9 z 3S £ I «e *s|s I lIHfsEE £ 9 — » T3 g c i p* •-cS ^ 9 «• I $ fil sl|| 822 S t* E ,mti II If I|L« ! . il, illii <fi| >iHil^Ihh sll»i: ! >!)!illSIl S^2 III!If &| 8 <j 5 •P £ ,v' 1. 1 « ‘C '-, ' » ^ !• ■-V . • : *. 1 •' ••'■i i 2S SM..0CLM.1M)WMiMpaM SIM wa Trlfeyn* Kyjasi-StlSSt'--;, mm &M>- ■ir. .V- V ■' :>?3rra 'M'b B#18 Iran m 4i;il. i '.K-.r , V V,^ •'•> >%‘r^?3rir‘ ’;ur?»i i! -■. ;V-N%'v i-'W • .V *, • w .^ ’-,v- - -^r, r;-v . ‘-I <,-■ v"i:-t‘®|^,!!^ ;• ;U .'■-,,.- .•; • f, •O* -.»• , r •.•X' ♦'.V*V Lj # .i-f Jf.ir. sJWV.aaL jil 8ycl>ll>rt*>*awl»islE*SBisi»Mim iSSmow. • « t ^ -w ^ ! .rii: , ■.< • T'.— •. ■ .-. - j2^ i Low«r l«v«l t !____• • Existing Bnsinodslsd Eld Into Hrst Woo* sCsxtstmsSsiiss. Addition pri0t ptf lalt ll« feiitfMOt. TPf i^pfllliMNtEl mm. Ym CM ftf to ttt NMnr py • flAirwoy.cryMCMMC fomgiipfrOTitMilMo TM oM UtMg 1* El* ttit Mute 0 «M MV Py RoUviira MIM office trcm vPici IM niM Mr MV A Mg proMom vim poWtei m MOIUm 00 ■ Mmo to TMgUlnvi H tMt vlillt moot of IM OooMim Mi. tMy art oo imon Mi. Rollviini*i lot If io MMlI iM Ml to Marc IM driveway vita a MlgaMr. carpoft Oo Em MMr Mdt. a Mairvay ctrdca dowa from tM addWoa laio IM Mck yard aad to tM carport ScmoM fol arpaad that problem by petuaa IM addlUoa M poeii oa CM Tfee aew addmoa to well laictraied witiilMoldpartofiMboinc. TM AddElaa ceaUaned oa pate IS .. -0 • V f m * ■f'Mi. W- r..-\ 1 M ■f > ¥ i:- c mm Glass block wim Additio place looks as if tl intended Irom the mm, H ^ . '.i:i W‘'^ • . . ^ « >• - Vlow from tbo ro< piano, which was 't: 1 mmdm iam,wmn \. Ji >: ■ ‘mV HttMML'SBft tBK J8BI SSLmi^sss n^lif/ ••» k'. t Af ‘i •v A*m 'TX3s?..‘-‘' r \ ^^'v\ '•i' I& i GI«m block window facoo couth to hood kitchen tabic with winter aunlight. Addition CcDtiauad from page 2S place looks as if that’s how it was intended from the start. The new cedar shingles are lighter than the old ones, but age and weather will it*’ Ai -» K. . " .* W * y/ ■ • i’ , ; . \ V’ i'»* f ' ^4' t '*'* '■\‘;r :<^r> A ' iif^ iWL ;<^-' - '..1 !|il^ inen i5ti ji” 7 s* -1 *' ■ a Sis•- V . hi .>.<r View from the rcdcoignad kitchen raveale a broakfaat table and the piano, which waa the original raaaon for the addition. solve that The Job cost g6S,(H>0, including the price of an efficient new gas furnace for the bat<water heating system.. Susanka would have Installed a passive solar system but for the trees on the south side of the house. That forced her to a partial passive system that includes the Ull vertical stretches of glass blocks. In the new Uving room, the thermal windows let in sunlight to be soaked up by tiled concrete fhwn. The concrete stores the heat. The partial passive system is supplemented by a wood stow. Air In a hollow iron shell around the firebox heals up and Is blown Into the living room. One of the features Rollwagen likes best about her addition Is that it appears more spacious than the actual number of added square feet would imply. She had a party recenUy. celebrating the completion of the addition and the opening of the new business. More than 100 persons were Invited. • “There was room for everyone. No one was crowded. This place is broken up intoa lot of small spaces and nooks, and people broke up into small gmups and they all found places that fli their group." While the work was going on, she says, the grand piano was being refitted and repaired and tuned up When il was finished. It sounded better than ever. One of the things Susanka appreciates about the finished product Is the way an architect (herself) and a builder (Pederson) work together harmoniously. For her. she aayi,“lt was like walking Into a worUag model everyday." "I was doing the composing, drawing the plans, but there Is always room for interpreutlon and that's where -jWI I > QIaaa block window oxionda from kitchen table up Into aac* ond*floor library. the builder came in, and like an orchestra director he had to do (he interpretation of the whole thing. He took pains over everything, and you can see how much effort he put into the v/oodwork and bow it all fits together perfectly." f'r- '. ?* .*i!- 1 r ¥ rj?. CITY OF ORC PLEASE FILI NAME (plea 3^,^. .£). , Klh&irii. 2. 7. U 9. f'I.C .5 10. 4.H. / 11/. 12 COl 19. 20. ■ ,y ■ r ’mJfc' '^''•'•^4-J tdS^ll Iisf"rfl^if! f raf f M block window oxtondc n kitchon toMo up Into toe* •floor library. wilder came In. and like an estra director he had to do the pretalion of the whole thing. He pains over everything, and you we how much effort he put into woodwork and how it all fits her perfectly." Planning uonunission council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1./^APL H'19 UoiO 'S^usiCic 'Hd OM P:So i\j 9. f'l. L iP-- fiS. QP/feyr/ ^-i..bfUC£ ______ C-CoK cfe fllcPmeic IHT' ^yi P-j:? Sol*r hJiJiiusr^^ S\-> tJi s n'lP'1-jKp-Ay 'Ht. hi JfS6' tuso WjuiA-k &uj. 3Z6 2i^i^ftV£ M<P. /yiP(.£- 3s^ ^ *?//3 Xf\ IVi. /fjp/ />T fp Liuji r<sn isj/ 5f\"7, 3mmwm ;Mai m- cy 1-/^? ♦ -^I'W ^>>c-^A-: :; >: V.L^' V)wr-f|( ?77' 'I . J ^|5 fiI °^<'Csis s^i^<x5< S(! Topographic SuftCf for L. N. R. Pro peri I e* oT Lofi iO-24 B'o^k? Ao^orre 24 • . <'^- u'j f • ].: ' ' • i v-I. Couff/Y ^ood /5 y :/ T ^rm9¥ C*rri»f •*0'ft* f*ni fotto^r ^iM’vr^ ml* r'rt^irtt4 ty or Mark s Qrorbefq he Ao torf r*^i Ofd tana Sa/'»«yu/« long La km, r7,0f,*iya*a - /.-. i i t»K lv^^r I.-,,,., p,',^. 'P---*- « , ^ « i CASCO COVE MOMSEO SuntWSION for OOU9 KLMT, THOMAS KWMCK aMmrMmt OF nucr V, Rt » no. 4«I, L0n«0-M2.(M0MNT0F IB5 SPmtG PtkRK, RMD PRRT OF \MCA7EO MMFLC JWEWOt, LOTt BLOCK I, ivy CSTA7CS ; tHTCby ttwt tr>tc tun^y by M >w4>r mr 4.root o-aoro vlitJOl oati UMt ! wi • Atly ilaclotarod Ufltf Surooy^r i»<tor tba Lmo it tim Slot* wf )tViiaoMUi. KAJl* B. MniM C^.. OK. Z* - I-^T •lH tCAiO^'• •» :wv • -wfc •*'*«# . ^ 9* yet f«*wr YA>P »«• ftrAC Y*rp »•* ♦IPK YAAP »«* r 3i i•3 24 c r\ vJS-^ ^ii - j 4-Voikf^ ‘ »w. 13T #848 t'<*r4ive I* •%»■#• xo 1 \ *mtAU MfM iPw:^Mb ##rr 1 xn«»>. *. j f ^'—' b±*-J5;---?!'^?!'*e^Ti£r=>'. ;»p . w -6Af • .-KMn^~h . . _ ........ =rS-^-i <<■'« “•' *•**. « 1 f •—rr=-6 -Tr= LOCATXCM or PROPOSAL (or property) cm OP ORONO. MINNESOTA Land Us* Application OOMDITIONAL USl APPLICATIOM Xfidr^SS 2^00 4t.h Wnrfh. Oronn Lecal Description See Survey APPLICANT Name r.aebi.y>. rnr. Tel # *73-199 Mailing Addreaa **0 E. Lake St., Wayaata, MN 55391 CHNSR Name !"«• Tel ^73-3992 Mailing ,j(, , ^aj^^ Nayaata, MN Address 55391 Praaant ZoniroR*! ___ (50.00 a) Ms. Acc. Um ___ *100.00 b) Xnatitutional (Church, Sch. •tc.) -JL ■1 A ___ *1*0.00 •) Com/Znd. Uaa __ PRQ/PXD - Ma (aa aehaduXa _ _Varianca 1100.00 > I Praaont Uae anaferiactioa. Sonin9 Ordinance Section Relating to Requeat Land Alteration Specify Ordinance Requiraaier.ta Conditional Uae permit for Land Alteration Explain your requeat and reaaona for aaiaa _Dond. for oreaervation of wild life M nA»iXT-iRl wi #846 VARIANCE required - extant of nonconformity _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side _ _ _ Width _ _ _ Other, explain none Specify hardahipa to property \)r~ 'juieIV,K2l1 SUSOXVISXOM application Reaidantial Other, explain Mo. of Xnta COMDITXatAL OSS AND OTOSR - explain propoaed uae of property in detail ApproMi — to t.ha IQIQ glavafeion or anounh t.n fore a natural wild life pond MXNX>am MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Huat be aubmittad 10 daya prior to Planning Coaniaaion BMeting) Application complated iMy Plat map aaction Certificate of aurvey of property aketch location and aetbacka of propoaal ^ Construction plana, if applicable Certified Property Owner'a liat ol o%mera within (300') (150‘)> from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance 271 A-S03 Government Center 348-3011 Stamped, legal aiaad envalopea(#1C pre-addreaaed to each of the na on the above liat. DATE DATE Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Applicant'hereby agrees to provide all information required or requeued by the Zoning A<teinlatrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Coamission and council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as eatabliahed by ordinance. 5/78 I ^4 3 i t 5]u #847 id* 1 4^ i-J'rnumm m tmm. vy •M* CMMi I f H!•xcV 1tt:vir=f>KJ . Aow NT M-Avo^Im >• 4 •»•(k f r.««r»w 4M-M' 8. Nq. 0 I447 /m r«;<j..> ,■—>. cv-j.. J•^?74|:Uriri_. r V^’ -W\ ‘ -----^ 43 v/ >*r» »*• JUMUtSOTA. T 4 J #ano OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD !—.—: =susf- ?>r-------- I -h! rM)OOCK*t ___ __lirr=f ____•*4_______o& —^ *f .— PROPOSED SITE PLAN THOMPSON RESIDENCE ORONO. MN. JUL25B34 i* cii Y rf Pf'O.’lv' £JdV:; rr>K^ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATION A-«09 OOVCNNMCNT CENTER MINNCAROLIS. MN 59487 If .... S^O^Tt EXHIBIT —fi— I CtWTirt THAT TH* rncr% MCrilCSUITIO OM Tm» CINTiriCATC «MC AN ACCUNATC «HO TNUC IICARI- SCNTATIOM or mrOIIMATlOH At IT ArriAM TNIt DAT! ON TNI AtCOAOt OT TNf HCMHCAIN COMTT OlVISlOH, TO TNI BltT or MY INOMLCOtf Lucr CO. MPT. or OAT PROPERTY ADDRESS ID ill „ E 1 zzzzz^/A-y^^p^- SZZ/7)Z^Oi S^tT)/^op. 7/ZoTZZS<r/Z:A/£/> Ef0L ^ss’c/co/^p/ccf//}fLfp^^^Ncrr fZ£S/(^ntfD oC o 4-s: ^(Zz’fMy fl/or ff££/CA/££>4 07 ^fffh/L£V S ^^ZEfZ/O/ey /Z/OS//£/’fLW£ ■I 09 /£SS-£Msr. Z'Z^, ^ ff^oo TfZCM/IS /^9£-c£c^o cff~rrZ/ SZZ/rtE SE/A0 s/?/n£ Of £/,£a££r7J^srp^£/^^'7 Z)£ it A'/) £4 0l '‘no.vey £Er?^c /37?£/rv^^ocff %1/iy^/sffrriE:0,9 4l F D >05^/i^sr/=’ /zys-fcK r/i %74'^z Sf?/V££>( 44-(yv^ c%fFtyp>w \n tA'dr/Hd£mard-i3:?i6’MOT £^Sr£tt/£I>Of J i _________________^ _ ^ ^ ^ . J Tt Wi^a/fW, >?'/)///>-* /9'^S/f£/nf£'A'£j^A>-JT^/sM/rjj- Tar 02. ZffQfSA/ S^o/Ca/ £y7FE '' '''S'Mm£ SfZMESf: Er/E/^vy '• "/ZZp £itae£L//F£ j:^o7 t( »l i( it U If /( rr /WA tt '/0^ /ZZI^'RV SZ:^A^^Z/^£Z*^ ri\4/ ^1^?- i’rA'jstJf >tZZcZ t> •/0^ 'XffCZZ L^/^T/M£/iZ IV M I.MOT MSS/OaTO 07 /¥VfSM<'/C£c/y£ DO 0^ diMSCc^l^nW7i'gf?;N■JE satsecr ffrp^^jery 1 }r L . Topoqmpruc Si/frey Av' LN.R. Pro peri Its ot Lo^i 20-^4 S'o^k 7 htxjhTS [ c*rri*y 'fha^ M’l iopogrjphtc w^S prevar^ by <rp or una*r try jiftcf iup«rp;siarf and ^hat Z cm c du'y L’certed Lard 3tjr,0yor undpr *!y_ ^^ordonP CoffZn^^ZtC /W Mark 5 Ororb*rq L>C No td7i €r<fip«pr\ and Lartd Surreyarj Lartg Lakp M:rtneu>^a <^4fak iC>^ ^