The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-21-1984 Planning PacketOJ •. - V, 1:'^ i ■Mi X V-^ * «# ■IV ••. i I I -^11 1!!! MMIf III !•; !ii: E ■ i -i- t ■ •n.j M 4:i Jr- .,fP V hr ni #■ CQ O =ife ill FiUK lES l!» !@a feM K* mm mm rm-’^ .. .. iifc^••.'.•■ :.^ .ii * • ■-,' r ) :•? i.>‘; ^\ • ‘.;.. 'i- m^. r . sdi0' - ■■■ ■ .' •• .;Kkm » '*CQ YSi^3Sx| o rn-/'-uL.m w, . ,- ij:i^'._‘ >■- U)<^5i U> ^ /i? C s^/X / ...% w :>i .Ml. ik,r\'l>\ 1 v\\' ,0J * ;» ! 1 \ ? °P Vi) b 2 EXHIBIT ^ e: c^- Vo * ■'! !i ( j ;! Il 1 )> 'i iA4 At^. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Di Applicati Zoning Co Lot A Requi Exist Varia Lot W Requi Exist Varia Side Requi Propo Varia List of E; Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Mr. Ericsc Staff has until the 1.Staff vacani 2.Applic be toe to WOJ o X •v •s': '>» % % N,s» 1 0 %*>fmm ■■mt9 4 Planning Commission Members Tom Jacobs, Building Official February 16, 1984 #814 - John Ericson - 3482 Lyric Avenue - Variance Zoning District - LR-IC Application - Lot Area, Lot Width, Side Setback Zoning Code Sections - 34.552 Lot Area Required Existing Variance 21,780 sq. ft. 6,700 sq. ft. (Approximately) 1,580 sq. ft. or 69% Lot Width Required - Existing - Variance - 100' 50' 50' or 50% Side Setback Required - 10' Proposed - 5' Variance - 5' or 50% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Mr. Ericson is proposing to move a house onto the residential lot. Staff has reviewed this application and recommends that it be tabled until the following information has been submitted to staff for review: Staff cannot find hardship of no land available because Lot 16 is vacant and for sale Applicant show house design meeting all setbacks. House shown could be too large for lot. Buying Lot 16 would give applicant more room to work with .Tv;- I V ij; 4- % } IV Pi 1: 7;^ #814 - Jo February Page 2 3. Appli 4. Appli p?m lue - Variance lidential lot. lat it be tabled • staff for review: ecause Lot 16 is House shown could pplicant more room .-iJ I rH’- r .-3*a7?-vv*: HI #814 - John Ericson February 16, 1984 Page 2 3. Applicant show where proposed garage will be located 4, Applicant write out hardships on application -.-Aw :'"" A....r.# mm ••j -m ';■•■■■:• i ■■■:...■ ,3ii I) *^‘ iV * ;V.-.K-' g UJ K 141 ir> s Mg»-is I CMV 141 H !'! I« .! o 1—3! •o pVO CM C-3p M 2 t • c.* ^ • • lUSi2H .... .CJJ > U. 0^3 !:§- 5 CO _ IP yj to 2 -4 M M *i I ^ H «J 14. p4 ,1 5 -153 Ui > ^ <n 2 lA UJ O lO li (0 SS z 5§S 2 to ^ -j h* :k M ^ <2 ro 2 o- 10 141u 8 y. 2 P p > CO ^^ < S:.. 2M 2 UI p u 5 > to gi CM VH < ••s; VO V- tt Q^ ^ CO UJ yj H.g3SSi“' CSI M O O < R 8 r*a* VO 10 AB-- ^ «J lu 14.HI -5S33p.;3 lO •■I "J 0 VO M M 10 < fO O 2 3 VO 2 g « o < oe p ae < Uig^'gl UI VO > ^ < VO o M M rl?^ <H Ch UI VO to >- >* UI lO UI UJ > r. -$ <0 iC K> O o o -J ^ IK Of < sS »5 CO VO § M M -J I > UI VH Kl •H -J H •M UI I UI V^ H 10 O' < -I. ®CD VO UJ > -•< o^VO §!j| UI > UI M «C H -J h* < 10 VM 2 Ch ^ “?:s UI ^ > %o < o**5 VO H CJ M 2 I > UJ N IH Qs-*? V^ V-l f"* H ^ 2 O' CO H 2 CO UJ Oil* VH < ""nS tu 2 2 C O 0^20 gzuj< aSS!^ o 2i X Sgis= UI VO > sr < VO o rj M I 2 >T I P-« CM CO VO VO o O' -J VO <2 kO H O Ui CO I4l CO ^ 8 u 2 CO CO M £ < ^ UI UI >- < -I «J H CP CO < UI CM N UI r f'* i < < •> -> VO 2 VOv^ VOo- VO CM I warnts Z Ui UI > CO < «o ^ o 141 UJ O 2 o M 2 10 2 VH 10 i. ^iis ^ H 2 O' CO <>- to CM VO sf VO CM I ts^ Ui CO 8 'p CO CO Hssss UI UI UJ ^ < to -I yj UJ ^ CL tt 10 CJ 2 sIikICP oc Q p 2 UI «<3 >• N 2 < UJ 2 Ui 2 2Iis2 CO 2 < UJ UI UJ < 53“S < lu lO u o CM M O _ I 2 ^ >- •• _ •M ^ < 'I'^ UI 2 •M VO o O O' < Ep VO 2 VO o < < o* VO H tfl p to u M VOrs g p P tu SScloB rS» ^ C £ u ^ M ^ H ►- 2 I UI UI 2 2 -I ^ 10 < O' <O' UJ VO VO o u: ^ > K!CM M U U < to igssa T “"S5N 2 2^^ p UI UI _ p > > p ^ UI UI P 8 O CO CO io o o < 2 g o 2 lU < < >• N 2 < tu 2 tu 2 2SsBIK?5h* Ui^ N. ^ 2 5 UI 2 UI 2m lil -J 2 ^ H lU “5 “.3"pis' lOZKQCl- N M lil Itl (A IN. M Ul U1 S g^ a a I M M M < S 1^ z z <M M rSSnin affsi M AS^SSozM M £*« «J M V ^ ^ m ^sssssi e|.l 9®!:? IlleI3 F If"": >1 ‘I S?'-h vt n- # iVX* '•’>■• •V rt 'M ^54! W, I) V. f!-V-' a F-' / O'r- J Hi/.IIUI^ S ^ 0\ V ty Sv^-’ • - T ^ tir t>ci s'^ r rviJ 'I^o, rz tjs - ‘ «z •• ^ 7«. ''ll' i *■ N < 4 ■■" ^ /v«/ _- I n*fl i K> ’S8 . “'♦'-.'Si'V •! >-llS FTT?T / ■ V 'W "" v<v “" a 5irti. ‘v= •IDP*'91. “ "^fe ■S® ’ Si • IlK. ^S> •'?'. itV W^ ____w 1V^'IK* 'fcv S'i«\ '■ i • , ^1 - V“ t |A 1 * 9 '— r ‘. rN:’ ■ ^ • 8 •••*2 S' s '■ “t ’t^.m '<0/?- S^' SHI- -SF*' O O 3dUVAVN B12 T •S'- S C • »Sr *< M * ■ ^*10 <Zi M ^ •• •0 <\M . VS’ ■s' • iii tu K27a?£u: '55' • I it fs,'^:-F—---1 fowTri^. -, •^C<r,..^'fe%ls3‘ ooT S6A 5, Wc i|jo<j uop6uo yf Va T 10 apsoMOi i£i >• K.. f0>/^ wrJ'-*/ M/f!li c _ f\>r/> ,o'^ »i' t ■> >y. ■ ^ L , J;^' m hi- TO: FROM; DATE: SUBJECT: Applicatj Zoning Dj Applicati List of I Exhibit / Exhibit £ Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G The appli setback a and enclo permits, Virtually no hardco dry lot a The appli( calculatii approxima hence, to Proposed 1 HB i\ £ I\5 \ » i ir r-'A uT?i^ I ui^ :' ^ i-"a • 2^^ ■ =i-81* u £ ^2:7* *, s » •1 M ^ to fO < tV* • sNX AS/- Q ■a" • 1tm • 0 •‘s^ ■ tT?? S S 'C ’14rr« ’(1 V.4 r uop&uo f6A ■ 1 S. ifO" '1 H ■\ 10 ajtso*»oi 1 It ■*J •Vi'l •: _ y'f ■i, " :^l ^ c.* i-r;-*.^■n^^^H^^||{|^|||||||||||||||^|||^^^^P^^^^l Al ■w:.: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator February 15, 1984 #815 - Ralph C. Bagley - 1105 West Ferndale Road - Variance - After-the-Fact Application — Variance to lakeshore setback and hardcover requirements Zoning District - LR-IA Application code sections - 34.201, 34.202 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G - Application with attachments #*s 8, 10, 11, 12 Plat Map Survey - 1954 Mitchell letter - January 31, 1984 with attachments ('’similar” lot sketch and surveys) Neighbor approval statements Building & Zoning Department correspondence and inspections Inspection - July 20, 1979 Mitchell letter and sketch - July 27, 1979 Mabusth letter - August 10, 1979 Roos-Frick proposal - February 1, 1980 Permit 4195 - April 17, 1980 Inspections - January 5, 1984 - January 6, 1984 Staff sketch of proposal The applicant is requesting after-the-fact variances to the lakeshore setback and hardcover requirements in order to expand the dining area and enclose a terrace. The construction has already taken place, without permits, and a stop-work order is in effect. VirtuaUy 100% of the dry lot area lies within 75' of the lakeshore, hence ^ hardcover is allowed as per 34.202. The applicant has represented the dry lot area as 22,811 sq. ft. and the existing house as 2,600 sq. ft. The applicant has not considered the gravel driveway in his hardcover* calculation, and staff estimates the driveway and gravel parking areas as approximately 3,000 sq. ft. The additions requested total 283 sq. ft. hence, total existing hardcover is roughly 2600 + 3000 22,811 = 24.5% Proposed hardcover is 2600 + 3000 + 283 22,811 = 25.8% #815 - Februa] Page 2 I sugge especi< 07/20/- 07/27/- 08/10/- 02/01/1 04/17/1 01/05/1 The dii hardco’ The SC] beginn: The pr( is sur] Plannii (a-e). .f VWfcK,:'■■ [listrator Le Road - requirements 2 Iments ("similar" id inspections le lakeshore dining area 1 place, without lakeshore, hence represented the 5,600 sq. ft. LS hardcover >arking areas as 283 sq. ft. 1.5% ■*J ■ if ; #815 - Ralph C. Bagley February 15, 1984 Page 2 I suggest you take special note of the history of this project (see especially Exhibit F): 07/20/79 07/27/79 - Stop order posted - Foundation work underway without permit - Letter from Robert Mitchell stating that work done was replacement of an existing foundation, noting Bagley's desire to screen the terrace 08/10/79 - Mabusth letter indicating that existing terrace blocks are spaced ^ ^ ^ not be considered hardcover, and requiring permit for the foundation work already started - Applicant's contractors submitted sketch of "screened patio area" for approval - Permit 4195 issued for construction of screen house, with notation that all walls and roof are to be screen only 02/01/80 04/17/80 01/05/84 - Stop order posted - applicant had installed wood flooring and permanent impervious roof over screen patio area in addition to a dining area extension at the front of the house The dining area extension creates approximately 16 sq. ft. additional hardcover and is located 65' from the lagoon lakeshore. The screened patio area adds approximately 267 sq. ft. of hardcover beginning 14' from the lakeshore. The property obviously has many limitations and difficulties since it is surrounded on three sides by lakeshore. In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission would have to make the findings set forth in 32.340 (a-e). i V S'.- .. V V OMONO CITY OF OROI P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BA' TELEPHONE: For r" Fund Object Prograir project (see without permit c done was j Bagley's desire ice blocks are and requiring 2d 'screened patio 1 house, with 3reen only i^ood flooring and area in addition tie house • a •ft. additional of hardcover Ities since it recommend approval, forth in 32.340 CITY OF ORONC P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 5S323 TELEPHONE; 473-7358 GENERAL RECEIPT '3-7358 N9 ,15021 ^/7 DOLLARS Fund Object Program Div.^ Amount O i “ -‘I' .1 .i ■4'. ■ t . ; i-' f•VH i -i «■V'- t 8.DES( win< feei 16 I pro| con lak( the] Secf por< hare 10. UNU5 in s the sq. The entj exc] comf com; at t Beca no E lake pen! lake sq. only 1947 hous for hous woul setb 11. UNDO olde hous a nu inte hous gara purp is t real area dini eave A po a gri on t; a ha: furn pore] over cont. relei matt< rate i021 .DOLLARS PL 8. 10. 11. o T%.t >•5 DESCRIBE REQUEST. First, request variance to add bay window to north side of house extending house out 2 feet beyond present eave and 8 feet wide, for an additional 16 sq. ft. of hardcover in an area where one corner of proposed addition would be 75 feet from lake, but other corner of proposed addition would be only 65 feet from lake. The encroachment within the 75 foot limit would therefore amount to only about 8 sq. ft. Second, request variance to cover previously screened porch which would add an additional 267 sq. ft. of hardcover in an area within 75 feet of lake. UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS. This lot is over 1 acre in size including wetland; the high ground excluding the wetland is over 1/2 acre. The house is about 2,600 sq. ft. in size all according to the survey attached. The lot area covered by the house is only 5.3% of the entire lot area and is only 11.4% of the high ground excluding the wetland. Therefore the size of the lot compared to the high ground is very small at 11.4% compared to the 25% permitted let cover in Zone LR-IA at the distances of 75 feet to 250 feet from the lake. Because of the peninsular characteristic of this land, no portion of the land is more than 250 feet from the lake; but also because of the configuration of the peninsula, much of the land is within 75 feet of the Jake. The additions requested of 16 sq. ft. and 267 sq. ft. increase the hardcover percentage from 11.4% to only 12.6%. This house was built in approximately 1947 and so the general condition with regard to this house and its proximity to the lake has been in existence for many, many years. Were this property and this house configured in a more normal circumstance, there would be no difficulty whatsoever in meeting any of the setback requirements. See example attached. UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY. As with many older lake houses, this one was built at a time when houses were very small. This house has been rented for a number of years by the present owner and its substandard interior dimensions were not clearly known to him. The house is only a 3-bedroom house with a small two car garage, living room, kitchen, and diriing nook. The purpose of the addition to the north side of the house is to expand the dining nook from a size which in reality only allows two people to eat in the dining area to one which would allow six people to eat in the dining area. The nev; hardcover beyond the existing eave is only 16 sq. ft. A porch which does not have an impermeable roof is just a great nuisance because porch furniture cannot be left on the porch - a real chore as a practical matter. It is ® hardship to require them to carry in and out porch furniture cushions each time they wish to use the porch. The owner proposes that the run-off from a roof over the screen porch be channeled into a sump or cistern conti'^uous to the house to be held in the sump and only released therefrom slowly such that as a practical matter there would be no substantial increase in the __rvf__TLlirL —jnHFjf __oJF __rvaJuri __UfjaJh_£>jr__irjrs_________________________________________________ ^ ♦V. bay 2 dditional r of other from ould ned ere ng 2,600 ed. the nd ot -lA ake. and, the he 67 4% to his istence ere f the any en d for standard The ar e ouse the just left It is ch roof cistern only ■ In r I ■ii :Y. %.*r. - in•'1 f 'n: V V » 12. The owner wishes to state that he knows that this porch was to have been a screen porch. The roofing which is presently on the screen porch was put on by a tenant in the spring of 1983 unbeknownst the owner. Therefore, the owner states that he did not intend that his property would violate Orono ordinances on this point. EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK. Because of the unusual con figuration of this particular piece of land, this situation will not pertain to other lots generally in O^^ono. Because this is an old house which the present owner is bringing up to quality standards desired by the owner and desirable to the City of Orono, and since the present situation of the location of the house on _l^nd vis—a—vis the lake is not of the owner's making, these limited changes should be permitted. rF' " iVa a ; i * ■. % , *• . m ■?) W EB - I 1984 \ I ]y^ CITY OF ORON 4*' :aO ' eXHfSIT tJu -V ^ «•. —-T" ‘-.'.v T—^— ’.l4 * . •vt7 li! V\ •' ■$• f • ^ r -5 o'J' u'r.' x:\ I «% \N ::J • >. / y . y vC'w ----■ ••' i v'J -\V ,*J XT.' / y '* s *X V .pON m^mr:' . W =*■ , ; , =; . . . £i'V m- m i j - .'v- ty-y. ■ CV ■W : 1 i i ■. z:' mi 5 • •.- -** : ;«Li•mm m§ myz ^■Y^l'«'v KijL-, i a-i^v Nh- i ti 1 NOA man l.ncwhall tAUf^CSS V.ACKMAN gcralo c .magnuson CDWARO M.OLCNNON mclvin i.orcnstcin RO0CRT ^.SMCPAN ISRAEL C. KRAWETZ EUGENE KEATING UAMES P.MARTINEAU RICHARD J.FITZGERALD PHILIP J.ORTHUN JOHN A. FORREST WILLIAM E. FOX JERROLD F.BEROFALK WILLIAM T. DOLAN DAVID M.LCBEDOFF JOHN H.STROTHMAN DAVID G.NEWHALL KURTIS A.QREENLEV ROBERT V.ATMORE HOWARD J. KAUFFMAN JOHN B.WINSTON LAURANCE R.WALDOCH THOMAS H.GARRETT m DARVLE L.UPHOFF DAVID J. DAVENPORT MARK R.JOHNSON RICHARD A.PRIMUTH R. WALTER BACHMAN JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT timothy h . butler January Ms. Jea City of Post Of Crystal Dear Je< Enclose! exhibit! Mr. Ba< how th< show, ] many y« Fernda! summer rented In the as he ' repair teleph( then h< house i the tei repain repairi mainta: thf - *} U rep#,ir£ LCOIsi4ro C. LINDQUIST nonman L.NCWHALL tAURCSS V.ACKMAN OCRALO C.MAONUSON COWARD M.OLCNNON MCLVIN I.ORCN8TC1N ROBCRT u.smcran ISRAEL C.HRAWCTZ CUOCNC KCATINO UAMC8 R. MARTINCAU RICHARD J.riTZGCRALO Philip j.orthun JOHN A. rORRCST WILLIAM c. rox JCRROLD r.SCROrALK WILLIAM T. DOLAN DAVID M.LCBCDOrr JOHN H.STROTHMAN OAVID O.NCWHALL KURTlS A.OR ecn LCY ROBCRT V.ATMORC HOWARD J. KAUFFMAN JOHN B.WINSTON LAURANCC R.WALDOCH THOMAS H.OARRCTT TTT OARYLC L.UPHOFF DAVID J* DAVENPORT MARK R.JOHNSON RICHARD A. PRIMUTH R. WALTER BACHMAN JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT Timothy h. butler EXHiS!T LINDQUIST & VENNUM 4200 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 telephone ISI2I 371-3211 TELEX 29 0044 telecopier 16121371-3207 CABLE ADDRESS: LINLAW WAYZATA orricc f*0 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA SS39I January 31, 1984 l©[10WrM!f'^ ill I ' « fEB - I 1984 • * ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR J. MICHAEL OAOY J. KEVIN COSTLCY ROBERT U. HARTMAN JOSEPH O. KOHLER PAUL H. TtCTZ MARY E. CURTlf4 RICHARD O. MCNC iL DONALD C. SWENSON ALAN C. PAGE JAMES P. MCCARTHY STEVEN J. JOHNSON LYNN M. ANDERSON DAVID A. ORENSTEIN THOMAS C.GLENNON '^CRCSA B. BONNER SUSAN G. LOITZ JOHN R. HOUSTON DENNIS M. O'MALLEY DANIEL J.SHERAN KEVIN H. ROCHE^ DAVID A. ALLGCYER N. ROLF CNGH RICHARD T.OSTLUND DEBORAH M. REGAN MARTIN R. ROSENBAUM ELINOR C.ROSCNSTCIN or COUNSEL Thomas vennum L-CiTY OF ORCh'i .1 i **> Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 jf r • A Re: Bagley Grain Company 1105 West Ferndale Road 7/ 'w''f: ■..if Dear Jeanne: Enclosed is Mr. Bagley’s variance application together with exnioits and a check in the amount of $200.00. Mr. Bagley is particularly concerned that Orono understand how the porch came to be covered. As your records will show, Mr. Bagley lived at 905 West Ferndale Road for many, mny years. When he acquired the property at 1105 West ei'i f ---rented to tenants. In the spring of 1983 the renter telephoned Mr. Bagley just as he was leaving town asking Mr. Bagley to make certain repaid at 1105 West Ferndale Road. Mr. Bagley then by telephone employed the man who did repairs on Mr. Baqlev'c then homestr > i at 905 West Ferndale Road to stop by the house at llo5 West Ferndale Road to look into what repairs the tenant needed. Since Mr. Bagley had long used that repairman, he did not involve himself in precisely what repairs the tenant wanted done; it was his position to 1105 West Ferndale Road in good condition and repairman to make whatever reasonable rep5j,rs the renter at 1105 West Ferndale Road wanted. E»y:’■m Li N DOu I Ms. Janu Page It w. from of ri know had 1 was ] What sheei The \ so tl put that When to 13 begar and c of th works . Mr. E in ten he ha devel they havin a sub city that and t< conce The B. any qi Very i LINDQI O. MitcMCLU. MICHACL OADV KEVIN COSTLCV >BCRT J, HARTMAN >SCPH O.KOMtCR iUL H. TIET2 ^RV C. CURTIN CHARD O. MCNCtL >NALO C. SWENSON AN C. PAGE ^MES P. MCCARTHY EVEN J. JOHNSON NN M. ANDERSON VID A. ORCNSTEIN OMAS E.CLENNON RESA a. BONNER ISAN O. LOIT2 »HN R. HOUSTON NNIS M. O’MALLEY NIEL J. SHERAN VIN H. ROCHE' VID A. ALLOEYER ROLr ENGH ZHARO T.OSTLUND BORAH M. REGAN RTIN R. ROSENBAUM • NOR C. ROSENSTEIN or COUNSEL OMAS VENNUM }Lindquist & vennum Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth January 31, 1984 Page 2 It was only some months later when Mr. Bagley got the bill from his repairman that he noted an entry that said "repair of roof covering on west porch". Mr. Bagley still didn't know what the entry meant because he knew that that porch had been screened and simply assumed that some repair work was necessary either to the screening or to the beams. vmat in fact had had happened was that the renter had put a sheet of plastic on top of the rafters; over the screening. The weight of rain had then broken through the screening and so the repairman, intending to do a good job for Mr. Bagley, put some rolled paper covering over the screening thinking that that s what Mr. Bagley and the renter wanted done. decided to move from 905 West Ferndale Road to 1105 West Ferndale Road in the summer of 1983, as they began moving they stored some things on the porch as covered and did not at that time recall the particular significance covering or non-covering of the porch which had been worked out with Orono in previous years. Mr. Bagley wants me to make it clear to you that he did not intend to break any Orono ordinance or go back on any agreement he had made with the city and the circumstances which have developed were unintentional and outside of his knowledge as they developed. But now that the situation is in existence having a covered porch as opposed to an uncovered porch is a substantial benefit and he would like it to remain if the would agree to the variance for it. It is his hope that his offer to properly gutter the roof over the porch and to build a sump or cistern will satisfy the city's concern about hardcover and run-off at this location. The Bagley application is herewith submitted; any questions, please don't hesitate to call.if you have Thank you. Very truly yours. LINDQUIST & VENNUM Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. l- tB - i CITY OF OF OKU CC; Ralph C. Bagley a more usua This exampl and a house This lot of modate a 2, out doing g bill repair ln‘t >rch work put a ining. ng and lagley, king e Road hey overed cance been aHMniito 18hiXAMPLE This* example displays a lot of similar size with a more usual shape and a more usual lakeshore configuration showing how unusual the Bagley lot is. This example lot has about the same area of high ground (22,811 sq. ft.) and a house of similar size (2,600 sq. ft.) and shape. This lot of more regular dimensions and shoreline is large enough to accom modate a 2,600 sq. ft. house and additions thereto of only 283 sq. ft. with out doing great injustice to the zoning code. sT^^ei- JJ_ -flp u to [ \ NO' jr V ^0' '—^ .15- 7 ^^25' 7^' y ©MMS ^EB - 11984 £!ILQforok'o — .•i — ^aA ' Ill 1’ s/voh e / i ^ We ha exhib to th it wo fore varia shape and Bagley lot is. 11 sq. ft.) ough to accom- 3 sq. ft. with ? 1 o ■•'■iih'' •; i<<-5.'V EXHIBIT ^ O’-f ^7TO ^ ^Jl. CONSENT OF NEIGHBOR ‘ reviewed the Bagley variance application and believe the work proposed would be a benefit to the Bagley property and to the neighborhood. Further fore°ask th*" detriment to our property and we there-tore ask the city council to approve the requested variances. Dated;, 1984 ' V > . : ."j •V -I V ■ ■■I..-.:£.•-r.\ ■ k £^1"' We have exhibit; to the ; it woul< fore as) varianc< Dated: P>! • V' 310 t C, Dated: CONSENT OF NEIGHBOR We have reviewed the Bagley variance application and exhibits and believe the work proposed would be a benefit to the Bagley property and to the neighborhood. Further, it would not be a detriment to our property and we there fore ask the city council to approve the requested variances. .yujdzi^ sl SlO 1984 * I We have exhibit to the it woul fore as varianc Dated: ^:: *4 / // ^ *i:;vr -,aw V ••..•>. . ' '$ CONSENT OF NEIGHBOR w O exhiblts^'and^hS?,-^^® variance application and to tho n believe the work proposed would be a benefit it the neighborhood. Further forresk tSe ^^triment to our property and we Serl^ variancL ^ <=°“ncil to approve the requested Dated:, 1334 1©110WS niTY OF ORON I We have exhibits to the B it would fore ask variance! • Dated: ill.mr:' 7T O J CONSENT OF NEIGHBOR We have reviewed the Bagley variance application and exhibits and believe the work proposed would be a benefit to the Bagley property and to the neighborhood. Further, It would not be a detriment to our property and we there fore ask the city council to approve the requested variances. Dated: ^jL-Z- iMI X' K 11! § £ I §oX e Uj QC i Ss UjI J- EXHIBIT CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. DATE CALLED-IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED ADDRESS jlOS OWNER_________ iOesT Fe. jJ'i-oji.i CONTR. TELEPHONE NO. k. i □□□□□□□ FOOTING FRAMING INSULATION WALL BO. FINAL PROGRESS OEMOL. □ FIREPREV. □□□□□□□□ PLUMBING Rl MECHANICAL WATER HOOKUP METER SET/TURN ON SEWER HOOKUP SEPTIC INSTALL. SEPTIC MAINT. WELL TEST PUMP ;^ITE INSPECTION □ EXCAV./GRAOING/FILLING □ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS □ LICENSING □ COMPLAINT □ FOLLOW-UP □ SEPTIC FINAL□ COMMENTS: 5C ]l2i2iLiad^A A I n 4_kl O It ^ t-\y\t -=^-T-g7^A/>••^4.gr w its S 5 o <ip“_____r u ^ da. A t O *\__f A p pLyi____v*~_______\1 I UA. c*- ^ I Go ■ /U. j I Ui QC (2 IUj o Uj It Ui □ PHOTO TAKEN. Q □ WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED p □ CORRECT WORK & PROCEED ^ □ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. /JlQTOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. r DlNSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.___ Owner/Contr. on site inspecto r /\ ^ While Copy/lnspector's File 473-7357 Gold Copy/Site Notice LCONAPO C. LINDQUIST NOPHAN L. NCWHALL LAURCSS V. ACKHAN GCPALO C. macnuson COWARD M. CLCNNON MCLVIN I. ORCNSTCIN CUCCNC M. KCATING JAMCS P. MARTINCAU RICHARD J. riTZGCRALO PHILIP J.ORTHUN MACLAV R. HVDC COWARD J. PARKCR JOHN A. rORRCST WILLIAM C.rOX JCRROLO r. eCRGTALK WILLIAM T. DOLAN william c .mortcnscn JOHN H. STROTHMAN OAVIO C. NCWHALL urtis a .gpccnlcy ROBERT V. ATMORC HOWARD J.KAUrCMAN JOHN B. WINSTON LAURANCC R.WALDOCH Thomas h.garrctt xn CARYLC L- uPHorr WAYNC A.SIVCRTSON July 21, Mr. Thoma Building City of 0 Post Offi Crystal B Re: Dear Mr. We repres posted at to our at the ownei As you kr back in t Wilson, ] familiar the Bagle tion of 1 the west consists of the pc sort. Tl and two i The work replacemi and in e: new here I believi the pavi: is clear been inc LCONARO C. LINDQUIST NORMAN L.NCWHALL LAURCSS V. ACKMAN GCRALO C. MACNUSON COWARD M. GLCNNON MCLVIN I.ORCNSTCIN CUGCNC H. KCATING JAMCS R. MARTINCAU RICHARD J. riT2GCRALO RHILIR J. ORTHUN MACLAY R, MYDC coward j. parhcr JOHN A. rORRCST WILLIAM C. rOX JCRROLD r. BCRGFALK WILLIAM T. DOLAN WILLIAM C.MORTCNSCN JOHN H. STROTHMAN OAVIO G. NCWHALL ^lURTlS A.GRCCNLCY ROeCRT V. ATMORC HOWARD J. KAUFFMAN JOHN 8. WINSTON laurahcc R.WALDOCH Thomas h .garrctt xzl carylc L.URHOFF WAYNC A.SIVCRTSON LINDQUIST & VENNUM 4200 IDS CENTER • 80 SOUTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 371-3211 CABLE ADDRESS: LINLAW DAVID J. DAVENPORT MARK R. JOH NSON RICHARD A.PRIMUTH JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT KRISTINC J. STROM TIMOTHY H. SUTLER ROBERT G. MITCHELL. JR. J. MICHAEL OADY J. KEVIN COSTLEY JOHN C. GOCTZ BRUCE A.CNSTAO ROBERT J. HARTMAN JOSEPH G. KOHLER JACK A. ARNOLD RICHARD O. McNCIL WAYZATA OFFICE 740 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA SS39I or COUNSEL THOMAS VENNUM DENNIS H. MATHISCN July 27, 1979 Mr. Thomas J. Jacobs Building Inspector City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota AUG 1 1979 55323 Re: Bagley Grain Co. 1105 West Ferndale Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 CITY OF ORONO Dear Mr. Jacobs: We represent the Bagley Grain Co. and your stop order posted at the above address on July 20, 1979 has been brought to our attention. Permit me to set forth the facts from the owner’s point of view with regard to the property. As you know, this is guite an old house. The owners going back in time have been the Bagley Grain Co., 1976-1979; Al Wilson, 1970-1975; and Bob Carter, 1954-1970. I am personally familiar with the property and know of my own knowledge, and the Bagley Grain Co. also knows of its knowledge from its inspec tion of the premises, that there always was a terrace around the west end of this building, see diagram attached. The terrace consists of paving blocks laid on the ground and on the outside of the paving blocks, there always has been a foundation of some sort. The foundation was the support for a series of benches and two storage lockers which faced inward toward the house. The work done recently by the Baglc'^ Grain Cw. was repair and replacement where necessary of the already existing foundation and in exactly the same location. Therefore, there is nothing new here, but rather repair and restoration of what had been there. I believe that it is evident even to a casual observation that the paving blocks have been in place for many years and thus it is clearly demonstrable that the area of this terrace has not been increased. I would not think that repairing part of a terrace L I NO O U Mr. Thi July 3 Page - should such r< The fo; if any Beyond is to ; when n< patio what t] a smal! which ■ the st< genera; porch < Please your cc Very ti LINDQU] Robert RGM:mes CC: Ba >AVID J. OAVCNPOWT «ARK R. JOHNSON IICHARD A. PRIMUTM ICrrRCY R. SCHMIDT (RISTINC J. STROM riMOTHV H. SUTUCR lOeCRT G. MiTCHtLL. JR. ). MICHACL DAOY i. KCVIN COSTtCY JOHN C. GOCT2 IRUCC A. CNSTAD iOBCRT J. HARTMAN JOSCPH G. AOHLCR JACK A. ARNOLD RICHARD O. McNCIL or COUNSCL THOMAS VCNNUM DCNNIS M. MATHISCN 1979 ORONO ought Dually and 5 inspec- Dund B terrace Dutside of some nches use. r and dation othing been there, n that thus it s not f a terrace 1 f mUhornaeM LINOQUIST 6t VENNUM I Mr. Thomas J. Jacobs July 30, 1979 Page -2- should be considered new construction, nor do I believe that such repair is prohibited under any Orono ordinances. The foregoing being the facts, the Company would like to know if any variance is necessary for the repair work done to date. Beyond the work done to date, the desire of the Bagley Grain Co. is to keep this property in good condition and to repair it when necessary as they have done. In particular, the existing patio is of limited use because of the mosquitoes in the area and what they would like to do is screen the patio and possibly have a small greenhouse on one end. This is the building permit which the Bagley Grain Co. would like to apply for. In view of the stop work order you issued, I think we should talk about the general situation before we get into the details of the screen porch greenhouse. Please give me a call so that we might discuss the above at your convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours. LINDQUIST & VENNUM // Robert G. Mitchell, jr. RGM:mes CC: Bagley Grain Co. ^ixy Mr. Robei Lindquist 740 East Wayzata. Minnesoti Dear Bob I accompi Ferndale I inspect to screei existed i roi'f wou lake. U] consist i the terri The rent' of the ti block pli have bee; to filte the lake In revie’ would ha' hardcove is allow In respo of the o made in State Bu within tl applicat Tclfphone 473-7357 P CITY of ORONO l»osl Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 10, 1979 Mr. Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. Lindquist & Vennum 740 East Lake Street Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 Dear Bob: I accompanied Tom Jacobs on the site inspection at 1105 West Ferndale Road on July 20, 1979. A real estate agent asked that I inspect the site to determine if a variance would be required to screen the terrace area. I was advised that a foundation existed around an'^ under the terrace area so that a proposed ro;vf would not in\folve additional hardcover within 75' of the lake. Upon inspecting the premises, I found the foundation to consist of no more than new concrete blocks along the edge of the terrace and no sign of a foundation below the terraced area. The renter informed us that the excavation work along the edge of the terrace was begun in September of 1978 and the foundation block placed in May of 1979. Yes, I agree the terrace blocks have been there for years, placed in a manner that allows runoff to filter through affording the desired filtration before reaching the lake. In reviewing your client's proposed plans, a variance application would have to be filed with the City to allow the increase hardcover within a setback area (0-75' from lakeshore) wheiT* one is allowed. In response to the work already done on the repair or restoration of the old foundation, a building permit was required. Any changes made in a structure requires a building permit according to the State Building Code (Uniform Building Code). Any improvement within this restricted area requires review under a variance application. August 10, 1979 Mr. Robert G. Mitchell, Jr. Page 2 3~ =i~ Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator JAM:kh ■»« ■>■■ -V V- • •;:■ , ■ ^ 'C i- -K : -‘- V *. ‘ files. id. lannel FEB 1 1980 CITY OF ORONO February 1, 1980 Mr. Tom Jacobs City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN I'll call you next week. Thanks, J ROOS-FRICK, Inc. 3517 Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55408 Phone (612) 827-4731 GUST ROOS MAsniPAtaiKs A Ml ill I ^ API m HA E.V. FRICK MAS nil WAIIKM A MJAOflfIJAS 55323 Here is an idea for the screened patio area a^^lO^l^emdale^ What do you think? Would you issue a building permit on such a sl^ucture? £ Iffk\m% \ E.V. r MASnill AMMC -1^ ■RICK nmiiiM MMUM What "sl^ucture? .'ii .( V, >!^ / ^^‘V .viT •. ^ . ••• i • • • x5.«u •* ». ' . :;-----------'Ov •"'^*^VT-r^ ";• A.tlCP • . • V I lA^ •» t *# < • - »• * U - • • • • <7 < • <• • •• • »• • •»• *••*,.. * • • • • -• . • / '29/ltf’5 tr°^T'Jr ^. ••* f /> >»i’ 0/j) p yL (2^ Ijf ScfiUf(?in)i^,/ LiHice,' ( fldt m ■'■‘j . # ■rS5%^' ____r;«. »> :■/ CITYof( Building AND APPLICATIO^ P.O. BOX 66. CRYS ZONING DISTRIC FIRE ZONE VAR. DATE COND. USE DATE LOT AREA WIDTH DEP PROPOSED SETBACH FRONT R.SIDE rear lside LAKE WETL/s ACCESS NEW EXISTI AGENCY-APPROV. D. CITY COUNTY STATE PR. EASEMENT REMARKS: ____________Sr" INSPECTION REQL FOOTING b FRAMING r INSULATIO WALLBOAF FINAL beloi WORK BEYOND OR Wll OUIRED INSPECTION W JECT TO PENALTY INSPECTION HOURS CALLS • 12 A M. INSP, CALL 1 • 4 P.M. INSP COPY white-file CANARY-INSPE' PINK- ASSESSOR m CITYof OROXO Building Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT N9 4195 ZONING DISTRICT FIRE ZONE VAR. DATE COND. USE DATE LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT R.SIDE REAR LSIDE LAKE WETLANDS , ACCESS NEW EXISTING AGENCY APPROV. DATE CITY COUNTY STATE PR. EASEMENT SI 55323 473-7357 SITE ADDRESS ///)< FggLl7>/Ll.g ^ UfegTT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROP. ID______________________ LOT______________ DATE ISSUED EXPIRES _______:________ BLOCK IDWNER T?c SUBDIVISION (Name) ARCHITECT/ :ert.no . _ (Address) ^OS' ^gft-fcJTvw P (Phone) -f73 4I4S' R — Must Certify Multi-Family, Commercial & Industrial Construction Plans (Firm)(Address)(Phone) BUILDER (Firm) Roofs - pg.v C_lc~ (Address) (Phone) %Sil HeA/A4^Dik^ kV€ g2"7 TYPE OF WORK New dditioi Remodel Renovate Screew CONST. TYPE RESmE^HT/i DWELL UNITS GAR. STALLS ATT. DET. NON-RESID. OCC. CLASS. STORIES BLOG. SIZE -W.HI. STORIES B BDRMS/FLR SEPTIC APP. DATE DOCK PROPOSED USE COUNCIL APP. DATE EST. CONST. VALUATION Q>soo PERMIT FEES ' BLDG. PERMIT STATE FEE PLAN REVIEW PENALTY PARK FEE SAC CHARGE oLoL- S~Q REMARKS:ALV- Vj3ift.lL TOTAL DUE ^ oo V 6?.oo r~4> e». INSPECTION REQUIRED FOOTING before pour FRAMING rough-in INSULATION WALLBOARD Before Taping FINAL before occupancy WORK BEYOND OR WITHOUT A RE QUIRED INSPECTION WILL BE SUB JECT TO PENALTY. • INSPECTION HOURS 473-7357 CALL 8 • 12 A M. INSP. 1 - 4 P.M. CALL 1 • 4 P.M. INSP. NEXT DAY WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS PLUMBING MECHANICAL WELL _______ SEPTIC SEWER WATER GRADING & FILLING ELECTRICAL from State WHITE-FILE CANARY-INSPECTOR PINK- ASSESSOR GREEN GOLD -FINANCE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAK THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED. AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF LAW ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEP' ANCE OF ALL INFORMATION, CONDITIONS AND REQUIRf MENTS REPRESENTED ON THIS DOCUMENT. THE UNDER SIGNED FURTHER AGREES TO DO ALL WORKS IN STRICT CON PLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND ST AT OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. h'U^Signature 5—7 11 i/\1 Appr^ rk: . ( t t T;| I ti. 1 1 t-. H - ’<r me:,kl it-:.,' UJ t- 111 •- <o > t 1 >D •'a) O c Z UJ S Q UJ ui Q -J •J Ui Q. ^ X 5< o o O CO O a rtilU o dzu. < oc K Ou zSh o<;u UJ IC (C 0.00 Z>w <UI t x< CO UJ -J UJu il oii SSt il- S K w OC — z UJ 0=0. 3 o □□ CL D oc<o 0^0 OD < CC I 5IUJI a. □ □□ o z Ul 2 2 -O O o2hi UJ a? 5|<« QC UJ o<,5- 9 i J £555Q 5 UJ - < OF- ODOC iA r\ KJ > % A I • o UJ T — < • <ui 2 c O ^ 3 |8 t x<yc i/i in lij 3 UJo (OUi ^ zo z 91:0: CL 2z^coi QQ < QC QC nr 2 X UJ UJ UJ o. 2 3 S U) □ □ODD 1 Sot iF- V) oc — 2 UJ O = £L C/3to Oz UJ 2 O O o^Kc Qj a: I 5-<® oc UJ 2] o<ox^< Q $ “ - ^ O 1 — r----- -I iMJ ISSUED 1 .7 ^ ES_______^________ ^73 (Phone) LJf Si Industrial Construction Plans (Phone) (Phone) e’27 Renovate NST. VALUATION 0^ $ PERMIT FEES * .PERMIT E FEE REVIEW S"0 LTY FEE MARGE • I IL DUE ^9»oo QO JOWLEDGEMENT JV REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAK NTS SPECIFIED. AND DECLARE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEP" riON. CONDITIONS AND REQUIRI M THIS DOCUMENT. THE UNDER i TO DO ALL WORKS IN STRICT COK )F ORONO ORDINANCES AND ST AT CODE REQUIREMENTS. iiLk^DaleTt iki Vi oyofc§w<H ZzXc/>x£Siil aa<ca:(r ou^ Q.S$Sc/)COUI> □□□□□□□a inin UJ > lii I 5|<«_,c JgE sSi o<5^|oisZ I ooc2<£oc^S£ g U.UL = Sli.CLOli. □□□□□□□□ CE D H lii GC -J Ui < H O H- 0 1 s do O 2^ UJ GC ^Q. m (/) ° §- 5?u- UJ CD Z o </) (O liiuu < UJ o z _ QC < O UJ UJ U CJZqCE ^ J I.q: !o=i sjiit ► H -J no2spH!<d ui O — M o a-ou-o; . c O -I 2 ® Oi q: -»o Q “5a.<o“C <^^<o2 - 5 S D UJ ^ ^UUUlIt- UJ UJ UiQ O J^£co:eCa.uj ^ GC QC QC o oJrfZOSy 2 \ *GCGCGCq^UJ 2<-0C^= 5 ' jGCGCGCnS;-5U.0.OU. « §000°z w S CJ U U CO 5□□□□□□ o lA13d^S QNVHnV3H lVN0Sy3d yOOA 803 38V SlN3l^38in038 3000 I sIsh95 -* f-Q.< Ui d ct O 2 r^Z clOOZ-‘~ 2>*c5!i5c < UJ ^ CL _j tx<yoouj (/) UJ -J -J u u. CO Orio. J I iiSsiiiSZ2l(/)i£5uj CD<dQCfroo^5 luJuiS-- j 3^<^S£}5}^ clZs2cococo2 □□□□□□□□ yi >I/) UJ UJ _jtt Od^<??S9E u-u. = iu.aQu. CO »- ;n n: 1 UJ Soo --P 1 p Ll C) r- -4: L < Q el Q 3 >In C.Id o V. 0 C- G. Z UJ X < H o h- 0 1 cl C h- Ul X -j Xo C ►“z^UJ d Q- uj>? 0 -5 n u. UJ X Z O H C/> (/> UJ U <J < UJ az X <H _ X - - 1^-0 2 ^ Q. O "22*" tC ^ - -J_ o ■ 9iS£j-(T a oU u. O < >. O -J2 ‘-’Q J DCga <ogd 9««J ujkd UJ X 5 K K ►- Q 9 CoOOUd UJ UJ UJ o O -XXXcl;^ §OOOkP 2 u u U'- n n ! A 1 J J vs (J NV H11 V JH IVNOSUBd h*nDA >//l / QSi\f Q ! M JiMJKtinni - V-/ I i___t ^ 3 J ^ m*(Qr*'.;• - ’ r .?’ >11.. . ■-. ■■ ■■"■■•;■ .>:V-'.:jrrfiUPi^wwwi EXHIBIT ? 4"< % ! •1"-- _______________ . , \ / \ ^ \ \ 'W:* CITY OF OROl PLEASE FILL NAME (plea 1 2. . V<:^ 3. ^A g>u 4 . L ^ ‘^'"<7 ^ 5. N/<C 6. Dcr t^ici 7. iVtArO f 8.-\u-^a^ 10. \ 11.v> 12. oO'^A 17. I'U/JU/ 20. ,4 ^ .1 A iF N -., --i-j 1^. i"' ‘ i- X. ’ ►:*•«-■■ki.- m t'#.’ ■ K-.x, 'i^ - \ •■ ', 'v ■■- .. . . .I..vi-= I fV\e^ PUBLIC ATTENDANCE k. CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE c>-\ \ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print) Gajj ih. 3.fhtA^ Aa. A,d ^ >T- /a h)(t^ 5. N/<C >5A^t+k 6. Cb IUan) m 8. ,vjLCa<\r I^COT t ' 12.y y-'i y< 13. 14. /) •/ n / 20. ADDRESS APPLICATION NUMBER/NAME PRESENT FOR 9S'/V^5y a L ■f <>ww\ rz^ C^k l:UN Lc k< T:ifiy'i>MF iw' saj c. 'tt: ■) b 9y /o y / ? >- X- ^ ‘^A’ yy/. - i'^7v I__1 l-:i # I- Ic V.., V CITY OF ORONO PLEASE FILL OUl NAME (please p 1. 2. / 3. m 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. ■ t‘in'** >!*■*■«-- . ■^(2. (i\ejd^ DATE 9\UM ■ TY RECORDS. TION NUMBER/NAME ENT FOR »1 ^01 4 1 •• *1 u.. 7 - f / ylo ?//</'yy : Jl- : • •.:■;•‘V-^4»•',ir '^**T i ^ i Mtalrf ^pc. MfctHAA PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS APPLICATION NUMBER/NAME PRESENT FOR 2. t ! /? 3.C 4. 1 ~?9 / C ^/4r YA ./Voi ilk : ,^'f^- /ysj^^8(0 J ‘^SiS’ 10. 18. 19. 20. % .';|i .- ■■ ■ 4 ^' V MMISSION MEETING \RY 21, 1984 7:30 P.N [L CHAMBERS opertiesr 2600 Wayzata Boulevard bdivision County, 2600 Wayzata Boulevard ent ett, 2696 Ethel Avenue bdivision - Lot Line Rearrangement rono oning to B-2 of North Shore Drive dential area between Chaska Marina Drive Marina ndment of B-2 zoning district - Codification of Zoning Code es require amendments to sections of } with review procedure for variances 1 uses, definitions, performance Lise districts and existing lots of Shadywood Road Ferndale Road We''t Park Irani Lyric Avenue Ferndale Road West sleet a representative to attend the neeting. Ission minutes dated January 16, 1984. TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT; Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 15, 1984 #806 - Willow Properties - 2600 Wayzata Boulevard Preliminary Subdivision ~ Public Hearing Public Hearing Planning Commission action - recommend tabling on preliminarv annrovai until survey of preliminary three-lot plat is lubmittld aPProval ssssion^'aeeting, the applicant was once again advised drawings were required to complete the review The notice gave the deadline for all new submittals to meet thloubiic hearing meeting deadline, staff followed-up with a call to th« Sooit tand was reassured that hi= ® applicantand was reassured that his engineers would call for thrnecessLv inform^ tho"Ao dt*® "? problem with tabling action until the March meeting as finaUzefar?iarsaS:™eetfng."''" I hav^ ssrii ?o“fthi iiittsit ■ will ^“"fa^iite accSr^oal°" threrLS^®Snits^issLsfd^r^-®®t®Uh ^ow thernree sewer units assessed against the property are to be divided. Council\fl®been advind*^that°a totfl°n' Ordinance No. 220.30 170 CMhdi..<..< ® total park fee cannot be waived. Section park Le? ‘ consideration to 25% of the iota! r 'j' ' Mi rd pproval vised view, public applicant ry informa- bing as be ' .xl tearing. Lde of Lty Engineer. L as a the library iow the (d. ince No. 220. Section :otal 'f i * A i CM CM Kl CM ss in in M M I iO CM 88 CD in u Sin in q; o I N CM O •V CD o n o >• >» M ^ ^ in z o 5 ^ -J UJ U|z z D^ O Z o o O lAi M M> in ui q: QC Z Q o < ce o O Z UI < ^ >- \ ^ a < Ui 0. UI kL m O ? Xd: n < z a o H in in UI Ui M M Kl CM I CD I CD CM tSi Ui UI Q. Q. p O O > a tt ^ ^S CL P *4 K o: < S UJ Ui H- in ^ z S UJ UI >• _ ““3i S z e in o o m -J tt tt CM CLo o ^ s Ul s ©*4 0 ©o O UI 44 in o ft M O -J O X f- Kl o u.Kl -i ft ©KlZ ©Kl 5 in © M ft >- a a UI Kl UJ ft ft ft Kl h 2 M X o o o z 1 Li U U S CM • ft o © *-i_____3 © Ui O Z Z O UJ QCu ^ 02 >• in li < Kl z CD in u in DC UJ UI < CD O IH ^ UJ I u. CO M CM O _ 3 CD o UJ _ Kl o z Z r>* -J CO in z M >• S CD tt^J ly UJ ^ lu O < M ^ -i O Z O § UI hu O—• J CM CD o O j-i •J sD M in § a in Kl inin u oc z z o O < DC O O Z Ui < < N 0: < Ui C. UI D. Zo z :< <a Ik < z E o ^ I >•ss_ *4 UJ 7 Kl M M o -JKl N S CD < < ^ ^ O O O CD CM UJ UI _ Kl O > > CL -i l-l o O o > U •H esb M ►- Kl < CM KJ I >- CO < -4 Z£ u UJ M M > U. U UJ M in in Kl in in I Kl Kl in o M> CD CM Kl O Z Z M UJ O ^ M ►- u p UJin z _ M CD Ui in in o < < \ 3 3 U -i N o o UIu. ►4 3 o X H Kl o <<<Kl o © 4C < ©>—CL*©p© -J ft ©Kl ©K»►-©2 > Kl P ^ ©>•UJ 44 •J © >•ft ft O:O O ©mm Kl UI S 9^ * —Kl u ©©<Kl <r CM X o S o z CJ Ui UJ UJ CM UJ <© 1 U U U £1 o 44 44 4»£1 N<<h-© © IH - ^ 3 c mJ JUJ 22 ©©<M <^ O Z Z O UI ikH o H K-UI UI U.<rg •4 < 5 ^ X p4 C X mm •mJ >• 1 C ^ ^•u IL o <1 ft <z >• >• 44 -i ©Z Kl 3 £ CM O -* -J 3 CJ o z Z Kl ft o ©o in 44 44 CM p u#o © UI UI Ln z C4 U3 CJ s7 O o ©-j © o Z X O o ©o •M sj*o ©O U4»CJ ft Kl O ►- 1“ sf -J Kl o <<<«-4 mJ Kl ft u ©Z UI tt q: r oo < 3 o o Z UI < < >• \ q; < UI CL UJ Q. Z O Z X < CL :c < z S O H 3g Kl inin Kl CM I S 2 23 7Kl M ^4 *4 ^ Kl in _ Q o X ^ CD CM Ui UJ o O Kl O > > CD «i O -i in Kl inin ►- Kl < -I CM KJ • CD < UI 3 7 ____in Kl l-i »H ^ «l Kl in *4 <o < < p_ rs o o X 2 CD CM UJ UJ O OKl O > > CD O ^ QM Z M oo Kl CM t CD in u D M§2 ►4 HZ U UJ M M u. U M in inminin CD Z Z•4 UJ O I K> Kl K4 ►-u o in z »4 UJ CO Kl O ti < < 3 3 3 a z ^ UJ q: ex n o o < cx aO Z Ui < < \ tt < UJ CL UJ CL ZO z X < •4 O ^ in CM > H UJ in Klinin ft UJKl u CM I a S o Qc inS IM o ZKl 2 I Kl Kl in CK in CO o Kl O 3§ Z 3 O CD CK QC 44 UI UJ ip o S8».§ CK CX ft ^ ft V z o ft «»4 C3 O mJ 0 < »4 «4 ^ ^ «4 CM >-ft o o Kl u z zCM 1 O H K CO -I in in •4 O U« M Kl Kl m o Q • _ I U < K* © M Q >• Ml M ^ O O <K ft m in ft ft 44 o “‘SSK* 3 3 X U © o o o O M Kl O UI UI © > <ft|AHvoiif bJo o <W lAf O X © © *4 © #Ui CM -1 Oi ^ «s§s iM >- © UJ iLJvNi 1 O H h- _i lA lA fNi 9ib 1 u ^A fe© ^ O 44 44 •4 O M B B 1M __1 1 1 mm mm Kl © O p n n © -4 V u o © Z ZtfA #% fill f4 «A AW w U U Kl O © ©© o sa ©in Klin a** ft ft O Q ^ 3 Z O Ui 3 UI m z oK- © CM Ooo ino CM ^» ©Kl o in ft in CJ Kl CM I © u S I Kl Kl a a Ui U> 4C o O -I X C& ft cx ft UI 4CU U 2;; CL ©Kl UI UI M p 44 Z O O o 44c. o. o a 44 w t. © CO CM © ft tsioCX r:ft a u cxUi <C m Z UJ >• \<, ^ < UJ rx © ft Uf ft 5 3 o :: :<z ct z < CL o CXn CJ X Ui il l y of ORost Office Box GG-Crystal Bay. MWillow Properl 1415 East Way: Wayzata, MN NOTICE OF PLANNIl Date of Meeting Votes: Foi Planning Corrunissi Approva.1 Approval Approval Denial Tabled Tabled No actio NOTES AND SPEC I A! your proposed h<a i n r*g>r»o -j pf- hearing by Mor bave any quest Applicant's r Applicant's r additional in meeting is for the In all cases, the requested informat or the City will c If the applicant contact the Zoni If you de:;iro cer they ar..‘ avail;.}.] t f CDnnn ©OnO ■ i ♦•'•'1-r-** CD CVJ O0^o “ !• • • h:-- » M ■ ^ V/JLVV/i\l^ost ^ fficc Box GC* Crystal Bay, Minnesota • Municipal OfficesTelephone *l73*73f)7 control No. 15-;. f- .■'S Willow Properties 1415 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, MN 55391 _ _ Variance_ _ Conditional Use Permit 2?_ Subdivision, Preliminary Date o^ Notice 1/2j/H4 notice of planning commission action Date of Meeting 1/16/84 Votes: For Against cc Reiersgord Law Firm 423 Citizens State Bank Bldg 5050 Excelsior Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Att: Albert B. Yngve Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted -etingDenial Tabled Tabled For reasons noted Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Ttudy"^ Planning Commission No action required be in r.f 7Z^Z:. Z at ;:JU p.m.- -r-TOust— ^ing by Monday, rebruary 1, 1984. X Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission 2/21/.84 Council ~ scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the ^ meeting is .- . ----------------———-_____ • orfor the t:------•----------------—— __________ meeting. Jeg:est:rinforL°tioTwuL'r or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. -^t't^^h^finformation, please If you dcTwiro certified cooj'^s of the offir'i-^i r>i-» they are avai,.:d,,. r.-om t;..; Buiidi:,., a^fz'nlng S . one approv:,! ;.y th<. ?!a::n iCettmission. ' ' :•#!>■ -•‘‘V 4' •r I .tf' #- M : ry- r;i I" h >■it: If M 1 I 1 I’ i A n ORDINANi CHAPTER 39 CHANGING Tl and RECREAl THE Cl Sectio amended by amend 39.170 Holding SubdivJ Statutes 1971, St subdividers as a or development of or any other mean use for’park, pla a reasonable port: specified, said p< tHe Subdivider sh< fn tfie acquisitior grounds or storm v connection with la equivalent amount form nf rtpridgd by Comprehensive La Subdiv dedicated as a r for the above pul of proposed dedi< drainage, geolog] Subdivisi s hal^^^^deve2£iLj3lii^ and guidelines for should reasonably b standards and guide ^^cation to be assij use proposed for su< density and site de> Commission shall fui time to such standai of land which may oc and changes in plnnr development and Mm' Use Permit )n. Preliminary Bank Bldg. i. 116 jve il meeting applicant Commission d for “roust pnh] ) p if you : of 1 of ease ion Minutes r o V i ev/ •; I] w ith' ORDINANCE NO. 220 A n ordinance to amend THF vniMTr-TOAT CHAPTER 39 REUTING TO THE^Rnrv^QTnS°f AMENDING CHANGING THE REQUIREMENTS Pr»R REPLAT OF LAND AND and recreational purposes in the cm^ofoSof'^'*’ THE CITY COUNCIL OF TME CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: amended by «">"ndin^Cha^t%^9f ie^ion^sfllS^s^fouis^ Statutes 1971 ^^statrstatu ^^L^358*^Subd ”2Minnesota subdividers as a prerequisite or development of any land previously divld*.d subdivision use for park, playeround~'~.;^n . " ^ dedicate to the public a reasonable portion of the land'’beW*p?™ter^'' bolding areas and ponds specified, said portions to be appr^fd b^^K of ‘’®''®l°P«d as hereinafter 5be subdivider shall at the of the^t^ thereof tRe-acqulsiti 5^ development or for use grounds or storm water holdine areas tenance of public parks, play- connection with land previously am P°"ds, and debt retirement in equivalent amount in cash based I'^tred for such public purposes, an fprm nf eontribiiMmi (cash or land°"* ^ undeveloped land value. The rbe combination thereof) ‘ Comprehensive ^nd 0^”"plan ' ** upon need and conformance dedicated a^require^^nt ^^Ui^s’^s^ti Any land to be for the above public purposes, ^actorrused^i be reasonably adaptable of proposed dedicated areas shall In^f a f evaluating the adequacy drainage, geology, tree c^^e^lc^e^^^L'd^ lo^r^i:!;!^"' topography," ^ shall develop and Tn ^§-£S£!£_Comissionand p.Wd.1 ..............1° the City ^uncil for admr - should reasonably be required ^n Ko P rtion ot each such dewLloBlut-ms^ standards and guidelines Jy taVLto cons-r** ficatlon to be assigned to the land to be df the zoning class!- use proposed for such land aiuenitio*! #- ^ ®veloped, the particular density and site development as nroDoc ^ Provided and factors of Commission shall further re^nn ^ ^ subdivider. The Park time to such standards and gunelinL'^to^r "*®^nJ«ients from time to of land which may occur, chanres in ^ changes in the usage i-viop-n, ,„j »»■ »eh. ■ ordinance Page 2 preliminar ^ach case, of such la or dedicate the total , Planning O playground! determined of the Cit] 1 t r 2 t t m' d’ 3 d< r< SI Cc Commissior recommend total area should be above publ to be made need and 1 holding ar Plan of th ENDING f^D AND fGROUND Lnnesota res all [on >r bounds mb lie and ponds ! bereinaft I thereof for use » play- ment in ses, an e- The ) .shall with tfie 1 to be adaptable adequacy ►hy. ordinance No. 220 Page 2 Planning Commission shall consider the need and location for parks, playgrounds, open space, storm water holding areas and ponds as of^th^^City^^ Commission and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan 1) Planning Commission may refer any .proposed subdivision to the Park Commission for their specific review and recommendations. ll Planning Commission shall refer each proposed subdivision llr. r their specific review and recommenda tions whenever the proposed subdivision includes forty (40) or more acres of land and/or twenty (20) or more residential dwelling units. 3) The Planning Commission shall refer all proposed land dedications to the Park Commis: ion for their review and recoi^endations including land dedications offered by the subdivider and/or proposals initiated by the Planning Commission. r*r»iimi* * ®abdiyision 5, Park—Commission Recommenda<'irtr\ The Parv CO^ISSion Shall. i„ each specific case referred to shouL b^/ l°=^tion of such land that the Park Commission feels ould be so. conveyed or dedicated within the development for the t^be m^ • and/or the total amount of caL contrib^ion need and Commission shall consider the ho?l ^ location for parks, playgrounds, open space, storm water Plafol t^rcity? "" determined by the Comprehensive Land Use ,ih i I •- .>•: 'h Si M; t il ir t\ :c DX not to dedic section here not be requi subdivision meets all th Council, Sch consider the through pure proposed und • Su area so conv its cash equ allowance fo the developm addition to Unit Develop; flowage easei Sul open space f< slibdlvision ; by the futuri credit at th< of dedicatioi it is in the are met: (a) opt not anc (b) spa 0_ _1 1. At the 1 shall, in location > conveyed rpo.ses and/or land. The : parks, : as I Use Plan subdivision nd ed subdivision nd recommenda- orty (40) or dential d land w and by the ing No. 220 Subdivision 6. Lands Designated for Public Use on Official Map or Comprehensive Land Use Plan Where a proposed park, or other recreational areas, proposed school site, storm ing areas, ponds, or other public ground that has been in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is located in whole or thin a proposed subdivision, such proposed public site shall ted as such and should be dedicated to the City, School or other proper governmental unit. If the subdivider chooses not to dedicate an area in excess of the land required under this section hereof for such proposed public site, the City Council shall not be required to act to approve or disapprove the plat of the subdivision for a period of ninety (90) days after the subdivider meets all the provisions of this Code in order to permit the City Council, School Board, or other appropriate governmental unit to consider the proposed plat and to take the necessary steps to acquire, through purchase or condemnation, all or part of the public site proposed under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or similar master plans. Subdivision 7. Density and Open Space Requirements Land area so conveyed or dedicated for the above public purposes and/or its cash equivalent may not be used by a subdivider or owner as an allowance for purposes of calculating the density requirements of the development as set out in the City Zoning Code and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of open space requirements for Planned Unit Developments, open space easements, drainage, conservation and flowage easements, utility and road easements. Subdivision 8. Credit for Private Open Space Where private Qp^^_^_^^^ce^^for^jpark__and_^e(]^reaj^j^fm^jjrQ2Pi^ ^ a proposed ion and-such snar.P. is-.tn_hp.a p^r^\7a^A^y by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be uj^d for credit at the di-scretion^^^of^^^tn^Uicy uounciigtgajns^ of dedication for public purposes. Drov*7cf;^d'"fbp fii finds Is in the public Interest to ao so and that the following"sta*ndards are met: (a) That yards, court areas, setbacks, wetlands and other open space required to be maintained by the Zoning Code shall not be included in the computation of such private open space and (b) That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by written agreement; and Ordinance No Page 4 (c an wi wi th (d; a dc ini ge( spc (e) sul rec and (f) sha caT Su of a separate f dividers in and other pul establish se] and shall mal acquisition ( purposes, foi debt retirem( playgrounds c Subc shall establis and required t I Official ►ed park, i, storm been rbole or site shall Ichool .der chooses • this :il shall the .vider I City t to o acquire, site ster plans. s Land and/or as an ts of be in lanned ion and re private proposed Intained e used for pirement finds standards d other Code shall open space; the open 2nt; and •f Tv Ordinance No. 220 Page 4 % (c) That the private open space is restricted for park and recreation purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of the future owners of property within the tract and which cannot be eliminated without the consent of the City Council; and (d) That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreation purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography geology, drainage, access, and location of the private open space land; and (e^ That^facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreational element of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and are approved by the City Council; and ’ (That where such credit is gran ted, shaTi nof e^xceed twenty-five perc^ri calculateci below. -r,.™. the amount of crjedit or che amount "f. purposes shall be deposited. The City Council shall separate budgeting and accounting procedures for such fund nd ^hall make from time to time appropriations from such fund for acquisition of land for park, playground purposes and other public purposes, for developing existing park and playground sites or for debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for parks pl^yS^ounds and other public purposes. * u 11 Subdivision 10. Administrative Procedures The CitvCouncll s a establish such administrative procedures as they may deem necessary and required to implement the provisions of this section this Code. ^ if Page 5 area the wetland; % 1) lo si, in Dwe (Th. or Con shall ] Of £ land ar _ oi lienever thi equired in e required Jhlic purpc hedule its. jr park lich run jroperty without Jonably >es, taking topography, private open are in e se Plan, t of credit e amoun t Expenditure establish from sub- ark, playground, Lincil shall such fund fund for r public 5 or for 3 for parks. 'ity‘Council deem necessary lis Code. A I I > I ge 5 ^20 'Within the k beiow' ^ '"inimum th °ther public -etial, Of the P-rcentagT o" ^=ated for public rl^ ''®^°P'"ent. ® “^‘^“Wed ^Ssidentiai „ P“>^Poses. ^reaD ®ac3way purposes. “ “• ss,r “•” -• »“L“ P^^oentage -££.2013^ °f P*^oposed dens^^ ^^^®i££sd.densitvr ^ acres/d.u. 5 • OO Ol“ 2.00 to 4 9^1 i-00 to 1.99- •^0 to • ^3 to •25 to • is to or less .99 49 32 24 acre •20 or less •50 to .21 ^•°° to .51 3'on5.00 to 2.01 e'ong‘°° <^o 4.01 5 or more ^nimum Percentage gross lana he^dedica^ ^rea to 2-1/2% 5% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% J- ■:■■■. 2, . * «r more 14% ' -^^Sinniejrcia 7 ^ 1*?^£S?SS»ss», ------- >ubdivision 12 ^ gross lan^ equalJ-and area in 4-v ^ or gr© the subdivisfo® !^-never th“'’c''''*i°" 12 ce . ' equired Councii d^f~~2atribu^ . . \tfquired to^c F'’® tequir?F®^h^tT'^f^^ . •heduir^'^N^®® of for^par^^^^ not be req is a dwell lot lines i building s; If the lam of this sec permit for out in the further sut of this sec then in eff credit shal if the subc3 event shall of a subseq equivalent Minnetonka < i. Passed by t‘ February Walter R^Be ^enever "equired as purposes gross Qrea >ccut>ied area be ^ be of a -entage tsga ^ area to nance No, 6 220Subdivision 13, Dedication Not Required - Dedication will not be required for any combination of lots into one lot on which there is a dwelling unit already existing nor for any alterations of existing lot lines which alterations result in no increase in the number of building sites. Subdivision 14. Development of Land Previously Platted - If the land has already been previously subdivided, the requirements of this section shall apply at the time of issuance of a building permit for the primary structure. The cash payment shall be as set out in the current city fee schedule. Subdivision 15, Future Subdivisions - Any land which is further subdivided, divided, or replatted subsequent to the imposition of this section shall be subject to the requirements of the ordinance then in effect concerning dedications of land for public purposes, and credit shall be given for any charges previously bnposed upon that land if the subdivider can prove that fees were previously paid. In no event shall the City be liable for any payment which may be due because of a subsequent reduction in the applicable percentage of land or equivalent market value in cash to be dedicated. Section 2. This ordinance shall be published in the Lake Minnetonka Sun and shall be effective upon publication. Passed by the Orono City Council this -----February ___________, 19 79 . by a vote of thirteenth ) ILM A i,y\ n ///A.v^ Van N ' day of ayes and 0 William B Mayor ATTEST: R^/^enson, Clerk/Administrator Published in the Lake Minnetonka Sun on the -- - - - - - - - -<5ay of _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 19 - . •V- ’■! edication will Dt on which there tions of existing tie number of sly Platted - B requirements a building ill be as set ind which is 5 the imposition : the ordinance .c purposes, and id upon that land >aid. In no ly be due because of land or I in the Lake __ day of es and 0 navs ZONING APPLICATIONS PARK DEDICATION FEES City of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. (CONT.) Ord. 220 Cash contributions in liou of land (see Ordinance 220 for land contribution) for use in the acquisition, development or maintenance public parks, playgrounds, storm v;ater holding areas and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes. Residential Development - Cash contributions dedicated shall be according to the following table: Cwelllng Uble (The greecer o or sened pem Density ! preposed density Icted denltv) A Single Lxls tine 9 Single Nev c Duplex Per Ride. 0 .c .^!ulte tx Is ting Per Ihiit Res. ecrcs/d.u.d.u./acre S.CO or sore .20 or less $ 50 $100 $ 250 $150 $0 2.00 CO .50 to .21 150 200 500 3C0 0 l.OO CO 1.99 1.00 to .51 350 400 1300 600 0 .50 CO .99 2.00 CO 1.01 390 440.1100 660 0 .33 to .49 3.00 CO 2.01 430 480 12C0 720 0 .25 CO .32 4.00 to 3.Cl 470 520 1300 780 .0 .16 CO .24 6.00 CO 4,0’.510 560 14C0 £40 0 .IS or less 6.Cl or nore 550 600 15C0 900 0 Few A Single Faslly Residence, Existing Vacenc Lot: fee CO be pei^j1 wlch building !• subdivided, fee Co be p«ld wlch subdlvlsio.*i for the one "exlsclng' resldcncUl loc. Single Folly Residence, .'lev Loc: rcsldenclel loc."new" fee CO be paid wlch eutdlvlalcn for eech tXiplex Resldenclel: fee Co be peld wlch building perslc or wlch subdivision, whichever ceettrs flrsc, for eech duplex building (duplex is defined es cwo ecceehed single feally resldenclel units). Should en exlsclng single feslly residence be converced co duplex, che fee ehell be cnc helf of Che echedule eaounc due wlch che building perslc. ^Iclfeally Resldenclel: fee co be peld wlch building perslc or wlch eubdlvlelon, whichever occure flrec, for eech reeldcnclel tsilc In e mlclfeally (chrec or sore unlce) building. discing teeldenctel: no fee le required for exleclng prlnelpet reeldencLel (Slice. Commercial or Industrial Development - Cash contributions dedicated shall be at the rate of $500.00 per acre of gross land area, to be paid with building permit for principal structure or at the time of subdivision, whichever occurs first. PAGE 6 of U es.-: TO PR( DA! SOI A) C I fi n w d b Li C C c) (1 Pr Th se d) or (1. acc (2J e) 38. 38. for f) £ res: conui 3b.( B) CONE I wo perm the -OLO—- --C«>| T' «/•% T*' m f' r •■■ a »■' is; I '■■■•.. th' m-"-' ■ vC v'/ mM ’t- Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 8, 1984 Amendraent^and C?nd”m'ona? Use^Pe^^^^Zoning -n>end Section 34.820, RR-ib Conditional Uses (Performance standards to be Scholls^req^ire 50“*'*'^"^ residential lot lines: require 50' Hospitall^'^etc ^reou^“*^®f require 50' Researach Center ”istrx“t2.:??^runl2®®‘‘’^‘=’' from a residential b) Screening Required: (^' opaque, etc) iifsPSs»r€‘ris ■ “ •' « «-v — <« „o« p.pn.pupxj.. iiSfisf?iSH“~S3H£: B) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT rhHiHSBSf thHppJi^oa^t'^cafance standards established at thil to r- Zoning ional Uses to be Ldential land for t public ition? the base 2 acres. > be ections 38.370, rations in a r somi- Jctions >al use •ond to K> CM I I CO CM in in UJ lil M M H H tt d : UJ iU CL CL O O a o: UJ UJ 11 S UJu u S 9 o o o o in in<H <N >- o in in ^ CvJ CL o < “ K Z >• UJ <o m ID X X ft o «J pc nc >- s 0 < 5 D < h- X X CD inin in u u in ^ >* J PC UJ UJ < m u -J ^ _ CM CD CD m z 1 o M M >• £ CO -j CD CD CL •M O U UJ UJ UJ ^ I U. UL CO < CO M M -j -j cj o ^ -J O o3 3 o z CD o UJ UJ O to o Z Z o CL CM I O 2^ I CO CM s inc^o o f ftSuiX z lu U. O < X -J M S CM I!) CD CD <r X -J ^ sr o < < -J UJ CL CL X O O < CL O O Z UJ < < >- N CL < UJ a ui CL r o :: X< z O H CM §5 o -J ^ < H K> < CM N I > CO <3 7 ^ in M m N CO <^ o CO CM UJin o > in in inin »-« UJ u ocZ X < M O -I CD< o o o z UJ O > CL -I g§ O •-< < H m < CM N • >• CO < 3 Itnm in o CO CMm o o z M U M §2 M ^ U UI M M > U. O UJ _Min|g M X UJ inin in in UJ Muin Xin < zo § M Xin < 3 UJ CD o z U -J N CM flOo o -J -J 9^oo m o < << m o in M ft in in tn in 1-1- in ^ >- UI ft CD pH tn u cn cn <m I Imm COm Ui U l M 3 5 § UJ K1 <U. ftUIoo ft -J ^ (D ^4 < in< H in N << N -J >• ft < Oz o in o in -J CL cj a. o ^ X UI ft ft X o o < ft o O Z UJ < < >• N ft < UJ ft UJ CL X O Z X <ft :c < zD. O H O -J CD in ’"Sm < CM N I >•CO <3^ O O I Z Zm MM tn in ^ ^ o ^ < 1^ o oCO CM UI UJ tn o > > in inin UJ Xin < mJ ^ ID X z o qID *J o .J CO m ^ < H m <CM N I >• 25 Im m in CO CMm o oinin inin <HUl M M < < o oUI UJ > > UIX ID -I m CMICO Imm COm lAi ft ft X o O < ft o O Z UJ < < \ ft < UJ CL UI a X o z X < 3 < Z O H in•n inin o ft > CD , O «i o -J < O < H I- UIin CM >- ft CL UJm u z ft in CM O UI O I O < Z Kl CO ^ 3 oo < X ^ Z 3 O I CD tn HH •n in ft ft ^ ^ CD $ ^ Z CO o o o H q tn o ft CL ft -J UJ X 3 CM CD oo ^ o < M ^ ID ^ ^»sss *1* O H K CO -J cn in o M M Im in in CO X X CO o u u tn o in cn S8 z o M cn cj ft M < ^ CD CM ino CM ^ •2 o m CL m DM ^ p u. in z M in o < Ooo M H mz m M^ m pH z U UJ M M M in z ^z ^ UJ o UI MM X 3« 33-118-23 200765 OLD CRY SCHOOL OIST MO SCHOOL DXST MOCM in CM 1 CO PH pH 1 R 2 UiI z CD CD U X IP CD < O O -1 X ft ft ft ft Ui : ft < CL UJ CL O ? X ft fc < SI O K fto g N UJ S ^ M O O- OC 3 X UO O M UJ CD > 3L a ggJ u Z Z O Ui < < -J X “**8 ly lu 10 z-- X o o K H* ^ -j X —3C sCD ID u n CD CD < O O X tt tt ce u lU > <^ CL tfl CD «D UJ O: K X O D < ft OoZu;< DC < Ul ft i*i & ro z X «< oc S < z ft O H m. %■■■'■ ' E.ymBn tr^ /. 9 •/. ^ r * w t*- ^ « * A- )C‘v_ » - 2?‘ ^ 2o' I IC I jr/ ^ :V 1 1 4 -----------1 1 j ^tK»C. ________ Ti----------------- "7. • • • •« % «» • •• « . I 1 V'-' A'i 7-A t a IfjLVD. List of Exh Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D “ The applies RLS 115 loc lot lines w As per Exhi B is a lake west 100' o is offset t' As far as 1< acre, Amund Staff recomi finding tha conditions: Applies] designs* lot lim 2) The new] homeste< 3) Applicai signed } 4) Applicai easement descript *. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Planning Coiranission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator February 15, 1984 #809 - Jack Hamlett - 2696 Ethel Avenue - Preliminary Subdivision - Lot line rearrangement Application Plat Map Survey Staff Sketch The applicant is requesting a lot line rearrangement within portions of RLS 115 located at 2691, 2696, and 2697 Ethel Avenue, in order to coincide lot lines with the actual usage of the properties, and to clearup the titles. As per Exhibit D, Amundson (2697 Ethel) owns Tracts D, E, and B. Tract B is a lakeshore access strip. Kearns owns Tract C, Hamlett owns "the west 100 * of Tract A". The actual access corridor that Amundson uses is offset to the west of Tract B. As far as lot area changes, Hamlett gains +0.06 acre, Kearns loses 0.04 acre, Amundson loses 0.02 acre. Staff recommends approval of the metes and bounds lot line rearrangement finding that no new lots are created, and subject to the following conditions: Applicant submit for Council approval a certificate of survey designating three homestead parcels and four parcels created by the lot line rearrangement. (See map attached) The newly created parcels must be combined with the appropriate homestead parcels Applicant must submit a letter of approval of this rearrangement signed by the two other affected property owners Applicant and adjacent affected owners are advised that any access easements currently in effect may be affected by the new legal descriptions. »-'5 X ■ V-' - ■f- '.r. • CITY OF ORONC SUBDIVISION APPLICANT Narr Mai Adc PROPERTY OWNERS Nan Mai Adc (At PROPERTY LOCP Str Lee (P3 EXISTING LANE Nun De\ Pr€ Pre PROPOSAL nun strator reliminary portions of der to coincide learup the titles, nd B. Tract t owns "the ndson uses s loses 0.04 rearrangement 1lowing survey eated by the ropriate rangement any access w legal •* 'Vi :w- r-l 4H /•O A i %J 4 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FO^ ,_ _ _ _ CITY OF ORONO / / lEir A date rec*d )—/o by ^ g t<K.______ fee rec'd jl APPLICANT Name i Mailing Address ft?/ Telephone ^*7/' PROPERTY Name OWNERS -Aj£ t /}^A/ Telephone Mailing Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Attach list of more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Legal Description (PID) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Present Zoning Dist. Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSAL lot line rearrangement only (no new building sites) subdivision for nev; building sites number of building sites:existing units h:. •l: U f' .... J t • H ^11 ^ i tt 7 S * • .• 4 *. »» - •- v: ^ • ■' V \ .f i • V-' . V'^-- • •7, / V* V.. ‘ r.-.f ‘jif r- •*** • f'-" 4. I . * .v..% -•*’. •••. y'h .V • -f r .• ‘V* • * '* * f- . ; ^v \ •• I* /..V.. 3 * • , ; ' %" • ^ ^ y f • V ‘ ‘w ; • ' •• . *•' A • '. • •••• . * V 'v -• — ' , A • V* • • •. * » t ' •-«« •** i'* i- .i « •\ M ... 1 teipilgr Cfriifjr that thl jrKJSL-s;**- ■^***fi*.*^^*’^^ eonwr of Mid troet, IlMlotMvd f>i ?a?1.72 (temdtM ■Mtjrly eeriMr of Troct I , mot e, to a point dlataa P^Bt on tbo VorthMaUrly MM lino thorn ondlnf taT^ao (dBundoon ■ucory eomor of T»et |j !? * ***"* dloUnl ^ *o«*theaaUrly (*<MBdiPn) •^Mp tract dlotant 15 fo •Bid tnet, Rselatorod land «7\eo (Hunioti) MlBBB followat Boglnnli ^^Moct tho Boot Saatorlv *Bet Bj thonee donoetlna ’i comer of said CouB^ of Hanaopln; y. Ito. <371 BY (Ik^aott) *y^ *?** iBBtorly eomor . MMor of Traet B, to a poln iJf?o i® • ®“ «»• HortJmet B, and said Ua. thorn It does not purport to show i Seals I 1 Inch * 50 foot fcto • Ir-JO-TS • I Iron aaricar date rec*d i—/o by ^ g i^K.______ fee rec' d JL • cCi p?/- id all parcels no. of units fy) g sites) .'k'^ ■B l t ■ 1 t* ’ - ’ N •*.• •rvf * - ■ * ' • •• i j t N k .•'•L • • PLAT OF SURVEY IN PART OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 115 - I ,.V ... • J i • • • T -I*: -•. -• ... -I, ., ; ... . ■ ; • <V-'. »iW • ,. ' ••.•.•< -S'l'. .'v y • : ■ • ■ I • V* . . • i • • ^ • . * * V V' ir Trtetc. . aouthNSuriJ }!:: ‘>" th. " -«i~rt. «Si,u.s ‘Sr*?, fir r e«iust^u«-»„ c.»s? .rCwt iRWiy fert. Wo. <a7i»iy (*«uad,on) Thst « ♦ r .w Ri" »r of Titles, County of Hennepin; £iriJ/J5.i5*!T»>rt»t.r.i 1.Ma™Jf»»..id•..ts..ifrt\ ««•*■^ w wwxBittrly line of Mid Tr»et i hiII 4^^ B^sterly corner of aoid Trnri^rlt. comer of •; -."‘fedrXifLr^ri__ '(Anundeon) Thet «.*♦ 1 . • ^5, riloe of Rerletnir of Titi-. r corner of said Trect B Kterl^ eorner of T»ct *i thU^- £ Worthweeterl/of o*" Monnepln; Sj JS r“r—net w aieiant 15 feat ^out>*Wd«.4^.i I ** ^nicn 11 extended would i««...t «.b.Krtry;i.r :f“yr;“£'“t: :r ’■■■'‘'»“s..or;ysL.s;s «r . «„ ;rz.-rr.it rcrr;rSHH?’»—=" s.5wS«'~- n «« M« w,™ f .h..„ , ar..j N.. US, m„ „ Seale I 1 inch * 50 feet »ta $ 4-30-76 ® I Iron aarkor Mirk S. CronberR *- lend Surveyors end naiuiers Inks, Klnaesota cm. or owM^ miiinbsota .»-M| ••d'-’.v ,• • . • ■ •;.- •■ . • •;••■• i**V-*‘ I ^y-’.s--v.v.;a mmzi - .. W5Z t^8. Ro.12755 * •• fc # * «'v, . » ■ 1*^/ the aoct »m«r of ( rlfcht to a I Tract Bt t th« inat omar of rl(ht to a t B, and Hannapin, ^rl> itiM eomar of a lino daa. ^ndad would ••r of aatd ‘ron said “ of Tltlas, Befinning Btatarlp aflactJng aald FROM: DATE: SUBJECT : Zoning Di Applicati Zoning Se List of E Exhibit P. Exhibit E Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit I Exhibit I Exhibit C Requ: Exisi Prop< Varii Setb< b) Hard Allo’ Exis Prop Vari Mr. Smit The exis be remov Staff ha findings H: I TO; FROM; DATE; SUBJECT; Planning Commission Members Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official February 15, 1984 #813 - Michael Smith - 525 Park Lane - Variance Renewal Zoning District LR-IB Application - Rear setback and hardcover Zoning Section - 34.452 and 34.202 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Survey - File #813 Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Plans Exhibit F - Minutes of Council meeting Exhibit G - Survey - File #668 - February 8, 1982 a) Rear Setback Required - 35' Existing - 2.4' proposed - 20' Variance - 15' or 42% Setback from traveled road - 30' or 14% variance b) Hardcover 75--280 Setback Are_a Allowed - 3,062.5 sq. ft. Existing 1,843 sq. ft. Proposed 3,358 sq. ft. Variance 296 sq. ft. or 9% ;S;eris5iSg"gLage‘=:nfshel “h?cfenc"otch^ be removed. Staff has reviewed this application which has revealed the following findings; 1) The existing house has been connected to City sewer . i A rear vard setback of 15' has been approved in February 8, 1982. Sr Imith is proposing a 20■ setback setting the house 5 further back than what was approved before. -p. T #813 - M February Page 2 3)The a) b) 4)The 1 prop< encre 5)The I will 6)Rear 7)There Staff re< based on 1) 2) The j Ther< years 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) There There The I One-1 Vari< Such appi 1)That prioi 2) 3) 4) That No fi Propc of ea 1 ance • r. existing house 3ht of way, will B following ary 8, 1882. e 5' further back V.'- ' 'V; ''-V., #813 - Michael Smith February 15, 1984 Page 2 0' The total square footage of hardcover proposed is 3,358 sq. ft. a) 3118 sq. ft, = house b) 240 sq, ft, = driveway The house has been redesigned and located since the February 8, 1982 proposal to allow it to move farther back from the lake and not encroach on the site line of the existing neighbors. 5) The existing garage and shed which encroach on City right of way, will be removed. 6) Rear setback and hardcover variance approved February 8, 1982 7) There is no other land available Staff recommends approval of the rear setback and hardcover variance based on the following findings: 1) The proposal is consistent with development of surrounding neighborhood 2) There has been an established residence on the propoery for over 50 years There is adequate turnaround provided on the property There is no additional land available 3) 4) 5) The physical hardship of the severe slope to the lake 6) One-half acre lot subject to standards of one acre zoning district 7) Variance as approved by Council February 8, 1982 Such approval is subject to the following conditions: -# 1) That the existing garage and shed on the City right of way be removed prior to issuance of building permit 2) 3) 4) That the maximum hardcover allowed will be 3,358 sq, ft. No future variances will be granted for this property Proposed house and decks will not encroach on the lakeshore site line of existing neighbors. “L- I AMINNUiMLISt I mmmm - V •• ■» _____ -FEE-OIWIER . ■* VO • •• ^ . c t • C mmmm) f 6 mm-mm V. V . * » »>■/ ' V V* . .* » * ►> . . ^ V;v . V **1*1r<*.. * S’' ^ vV , - , • . • • li, * ' ^ ; r •t ••'S • - a * . ■ ;.'v -v . . jf . *• ,. , »>i '» 4, • " * 4 I •!' • . - 4«. . 1 •• 4* y. ' *:• ’ • r.j ^ V '■*K ■ •. - 4 / . . *' •••.r . J. V ^ vm 'x . 4' r * *. j,.' " 4 4%:** r- ’ » V, . < . . f* i -4< ‘ ' ' • . . > ** : •• ' * • ’ * - . V. *• ■••'V 5'-- J •O • 4 • • • > - • 4 . av • • ■'‘'' mmm ' sq. ft. :uary 8, 1982 and not it of way. , 1982 variance Lng neighborhood for over 50 ig district ftay be removed hore site line 1 V' 4i #iift^ciri«F:;'FiNANce ’ • t ^ ••i.:'■* •M 4* -________ ^-------* •* ~, veMT.r» THM jHf CMTiriCATC »i« fHUNTATION or IMrOimATIOII. »0;iT;^«y^!!!JLy MTI OM THf • AieOAO* or TH« yW>jlfgW_ rWANCO OIVIOIOA.'TO,TM. ANO ■ Ofutr.. -■’.■vV;-- -'5j‘ <v.... «« ■. •*w?■JT••5..• I'-* .m- r= •;. ♦ • .' HtNNCPIN CO; h > * * . •.•V 1 ■» •.*- icKvj^iyitjbM; « Wr u,‘C; •>: • ► * • ^ » • » ’ •• PAYER / MAILING ADDRESS S/H/^rnmnoPM^ . vT . •:// 'I vVor ' V mA y r I ■ *:* j - s a VI : *; I I »• •y o'V* •< ^‘.■ './ ^ *-:U7 ' '• • V,«• » •r J ■/ T’/•<• . •••■•... fVw •• 7^' ............. sp^e"• out : ?7>/>••■?^ > H rnmm&mw- w- ■■*?'■'"^7^ / • / f .Vt: -r •" t*.7 -rl 77 »• •% * •: -'t^' - ,-^____________________________________________________________ ■<fe77/ •. _ .............. •* » ___I___ f-r -Nl; - >.t ^ /.■> V > 7 • , • » ^ •'• • • - • >.'■’: -' ^i- .'•-- ■ ■ % ••••'•' • ^ A'*7-..■• • . A,- < . ^ . . • ., ^ • •. >*..^,'.^:V.:-.v -V''. '-f - *• V. *. • • >^-r >« \-»-•. •• •* • .-* * - -• •** ’-------------------------------------------------' uUr«J: ’ , • 0 *■•■■. • >• vf ir - '*V I " > ; '.' 1 . •* *; ••’ W •-■ • * -« ^ ' \ *4 •'>.■;• •.'. ;.' ‘V-. i:'•: V - • '.*’ .. •o‘.’ * # * •^. ■•S*' ,•* -•■••#•» .*.»# •• * •v;?;:’ ,•;.»<• -V-'.* •• •.•,■•: -.' • ■ fXHiWT .v^•’ *. # • ■ .V.- -7 V ••■ ■ -^ :- ■ -- • • I • - •; *. ► ♦ ' ' *t‘ ••/.' l' ■■*• F •i - ‘ » •. *. • • * ■ . • "• *•»..*■ \*'^ *' » .•’ I • • ' • * . I ', I- JAN 30198^ CITY OF ORC gO<0M THIt *;.•C.M•m itfOUNTt, r kilowLCOct V4* t: ». •v ■!*„ r.‘J . w m > -. * I: : • ^EtSS ' / 'T* •■ f,,. ' ' • • ‘ • < f .. ». • • * . r>. • * ' •• ;•wBSBi'fkl • '•{Vi ' » '• ‘ •■' '•’ tv-.J’Vy ' V-- ■• •;■'' r . • i •** ... *y •*s' ■. ' * *•• \v/-V > •- •.*• 4 V' ..* .zM iV’A'V.t-2grc 1,%^' «»•'■ - ■ * “• .j tv,"*.. . *1 *‘ * - ' V ••'* ; ., f ^ ^ IS \ 1 *' '• -hiV.'! > 1 • J r ::•,>/■. • 4 • 1 - - • JL i • n* •■ ^ . V • • ^ V. ‘ '.-■..'.'I ■ ,»,. «v •.« ^jvJ ••>■;:'>T V: •i ’ v**!,. :. . . ,N » . ■•*S .■ * •- I -'■.•■ . ,>• . . .^V • ‘ *. ^ V ' ./ . • t • *■ ■ • > f *-I ^ V ? \ # i', « .. I'Si ^ iVi- ^■■. • . : -v;^ \y -^ t Ly/ CITY OF ORON # o iC '••* S'.uvoJ^ . ,r-.^y » ................ . • ^• ••'i ^ ' * ytr r:o*''‘p •>. «« ^ HorJtryv O’l^ /m/ 75<'-<'’?..^ aV -//»j /’j/j.'W*»■«•( 75 7ji.' /«/// 4/»f f>7 /X - /y?j f 9^ J*/ /j/■,<'.*.V.»* /j 7 7''' hjdi\'of^ I ^ •A *€**■•.l^C I '•iT’.Vy ro’."*"••' 9 M * nurvt;y .-.r *•> *•••/* •• .*.: fi • jvirv *»;•• Ir'''.*.’.r *% iDrulirn “)!• 1 • • •«,u . j Tr<vf.v.:r.<,*r>t:cr r»r V / . V‘ ^ 4 V V I, • *" •• Ir'-.* ’..*v.-?r Oor.U-n ‘1. ('ofTir L.'-nti 'Jvrv*f,/o:' I'l'inn.-r :^n.: .. ■•:• , :*-n '4i i mmmf . : ” • -f -.- ■ -A.vv- . ■>;-■■ ;■ :=•:.; -■-. .■.•■■ ;■- i 0’fM ESlfcTES Tl ¥ o ‘•■•v L ^ u*** t ^ ^ ^»r ^ ^ •! . .............. • ^ «.l> •• *• •■ t'. • ;;:*^rr.; n: r,r.v- oV.ir ■ *. 'i •^r r! ■•^’T.- ' ,i M ESIJMES THIRI2b/?fl5R« " /K / '■__\.lii.i3 t .____________ill I ii * »■ TRACT EifHlBIT /»). »•.J HACT i •-: 7£ S *7 J4 •/ :,n :•« 7\ \3«M3i .. 1 It* MT C .(•# iOWgfri' OF ORONO /«''» • ^!S i 125 ^ \ I6(U).- I •5(l0 (0 9 tl) CA I 11 X STREET -A ^ 'i/sW* >.* a street •0.^* WM If ‘ ^ ''aV'’ 3* HI ^i\.. i’A ;y.^ • < — / ^Iv ».•; h-^ '> v.. m » ,-•'; y i*l • 1YM4 '\ 1 ■ :!'. y<. •■ « / • • • .. r •.• ‘ • . * * V» <Mb. iKH-l i A / '-■AW,.X‘. *x3 r U J yr V :' \ _ '5(l0 c^y) 2 14 --------- - ^ 13 [j'Vz ■7-II V 6 i STREET i.a LL.111^4__ ^(i^y (fcl)2 ivfe » ✓ I I f ■ i4BIP i', .>1 : ____ I '• r'-.:' ;■■•••:.:•"■ ■ ■ - ■- - : • • ••:;• '■' -r : - f mat? iliaiy-iiiaKMlii :uli iblimm m■M.fi #15mMm :2^v tVi!5.ssa mm \iTr< ^ 'm YilWIBfflnT • '*’ I 'a>V* '.y -. v;% >a- • fn ^ -»* t.' f L t ' f J * . •» f -r- nVsW> T*'.-. V;%, f A Mi . .'.'■ '4 ■>^', V'* hV‘5!| 30'A'iI’ r:, '' L=« M^kmm ja^4: /• Leqal revie fee schedule: $ 8. No variance keeping of anim. 9. Existing ac closed off. A1 lots and future be off interior 10. A temporary line, shall be < 1/ Block 3 and ] Motion, Ayes (5! Butler moved, F] lot area varianc variance of 80' 75' subject to 1 1. Prior to th< a) developer modificat: Judd Rinqo Current ov on notice tations ol septic lir to a max in Motion, Ayes (5) Butler moved, Ht tional use permi expansion of the include a bait a Council has dire resolution for c ing of February will be sent to Council also rea the temporary oc to post 6" high station by Febru Motion, Ayes (5) Van Nest moved, the lot area, lo of 15' and hardc back area) of 14 conditions: 1) d removal of exist prior to constru iakeshore decks determine averaci possible hoed fo existing oaraae richt of way: 4) •raritod for this mml:i::ting of thi: orono council, fluuuaky h, ivbj Judd Riiujor continued. r/v^jiu -j- /. Legal review and filing fees per current fee schedule: $75.00. ^xVw'o/+ ^ 8. No variances will be granted to permit the keeping of animals on Lot 1, Block 3. 9. Existing access to Wayzata Blvd. is to be closed off. All access to proposed 15 residential lots and future residential plat of Outlot A shall be off interior plat road served from Willow Drive. 10. A temporary cul-de-sac, not to abut east property line, shall be constructed to serve Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 2, Block 3. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays {0) Butler moved, Frahm seconded to approve the lot area variance of 1.59 acres. Lot width variance of 80', street setback variance of 75' subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: a) developer must revise house plans per modifications required by Orono staff. #645 DOROTHY FORCIER 4780 North Arm Drive b) Current owner and future owners are placed on notice that because of the area limita- tations of property and the accompaning septic limitations, the house is limited to a maximum of 6 persons. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) Butler moved, Hurr seconded, to deny the condi tional use permit application that involved the expansion of the accessory commercial use to include a bait and fishing gear sales operation. Council has directed staff to draft a denial resolution for presentation at the council meet ing of February’22, 1982. A copy of that resolution will be sent to Mr. Fahlin prior to that meeting. Council also reaffirmed the specific conditions of the temporary occupancy permit requiring Mr. Fahlin to post 6" high street address numbers on the service station by February 18, 1982. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) #661 PAUL FAHLIN 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve the lot area, lot width, front street setback of 15' and hardcover variance (75* - 250' set back area) of 143.5 sf based on the following conditions: 1) demolition oermit required for removal of existino house-house must be removed prior to construction of new house: 2) future lakeshore decks must be reviewed by staff to determine averacic lakeshore setback line and possible need for a variance: 3) removal of existing oarage and shed located within City rioht of way: 4) no future variances will be •ranted for this oro:^ertv based on th*- subst i.'.d:«rd #668 MICHAEL SMITH 525 PARK LANE •8 Michael size and wid Motion, Ayes No formal ac this time. niatter as fo 1.Suggeste< density . approve. 2.Access 3.Spreading 4.Question units. 5.Sewer cap 6.Possible No comments f iMayor Van Ne Service Area meeting was i stated that I Freshwater B speaker and i that Dr. Hanj on Lake Minne Mayor Van Nej Elections wej meeting conce four years, be on the age Council meeti Mayor Van Nej February 4, ' Shore Cable 1 it was decide cities will t Shore Service Butler moved contributing of the total Motion Ayes Van Nest me Butler be.t to this com alternate i ."otion. Aye -J-r-ilWiBfe itTiiii^i.mi::l:ting ok tiii:: orono councii., fcdruary 8, 1^82 Vvy^- !o!f ^ OTHY FORCIER th Arm Drive L FAHLIN RELINE DRIVE NAL USE PERMIT CHAEL SMITH LANE ■< % ! ■/ •• It > r>- PACE -4- Michael Smith continued. size and width of the uroporty. Motion, Ayes (5) Nays ‘(0) CON’T. #668 MICHAEL SMITH 525 PARK LANE No formal action was taken by Council at this time. Council’s direction on this matter as follows: 1. Suggested method for determining density level that the City could approve. #671 SCHLEE BUILDERS 3660 Shoreline Drive Sketch Plan Review 2. Access 3. Spreading of units.EXHIBfT units^°^ attached or detached residential 5. Sewer capacity vs. proposed construction level. 6. Possible need for park area within plat. No comments from the City Engineer. Mayor Van Nest reported that the Sewer Area Advisory Board Group "C" meeting was held February 3, 1982. He stated that Dr. Richard Hanson from the Freshwater Biological Institute was the stated he was very impressed that Dr. Hanson agreed with Orono views on Lake Minnetonka. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Van Nest also stated that City discussed at the Lake Minnetonka Mayors fo'ur yearr"’^/7ske‘? be on the agenda for February 22, 1982 Council meeting. Mayor Van Nest announced that at the February 4, 1982 meeting of the South Service Area meeting . that the Westonka Area cities will be joined with the South Shore Service Area. Butler moved, Frahm seconded, to aoprove of^th^^h^i^? support the costtotal process of the Cable T.V. Service Area. Motion Ayes (5) - Nays (0) Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded that Mar*' be. the representative from Orono Opheim as an alternate i. he was agreeable. .Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) DEC 2 3 CITY OF ( • # «i* 1.. . . i- Sc !>i o i’acil: -4- T. IICHAEL SMITH RK LANE CHLEE BUILDERS horeline Drive Plan Review 3 f JGINEER’S REPORT 5 REPORT m • > *: 1 i -#• ii ir WT , ^•••' C-Ttii’jcalft ol* S’.u'voy Lf:tr. 4 -rd C), -I'^rk Vzr.T'.nt^yv'.sx lir-.tr.it ?;.rv Ht?nr.‘*nir. Co’:nty, NorJeav ’C’^ - lyiotiqf/hadco^^*’ lilV»haf)iot^e^ IS jJt>6ct. \ y.’’ \ • :'r*'.>v fc-r*;-'.' I' k?- '.M ‘ *:: a *.r\-c '''••rr^r;* : • r.-,;;.i:-.trjtior. ''•T » r***nt.»** 'tr t -4 . ♦ ^w V *V ♦ V»4 *• • - . 1 ...1 * * C ' • . % n! two j-nvrv'r.T.-tn*.:- cr •«« • ^ 4. ^ ^ y • ••.•*•- ^ ••* •• •0*4 4 •. . I « • • • w It not ’';ir">'-;rt to tjnnv ot*;?r I'* - 40' I 'L * ^ * •• '•..»v.:>r Gor-.'or. h. (‘otTin ;toy. L>n(j G‘JfV‘;yor vi:;d t'ln.nr ’.T Ion.: j XI; n ;.• '•*t*i ' “ ■4*-- V List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Backqroi Prior t a comme a small Commerc Drive M and cap propert; Shore D: founded access ‘ use wou! resideni against the pla; Early th the City will hou repaired existing The new lot line used bui used lot been ask is resol cTrn Ck 80' '•ir' ^ > *« . • ‘ •» • ';>a r' ■"»•«■ r. ^ ^ ’ ■» TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 16, 1984 Rezoning of North Shore Drive Marina List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Property Owners List Exhibit B — Plat Map Exhibit C - Plat Map Designating Notification Zone Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Millard Letter Exhibit F - Norum Letter Exhibit G - Lyman Letter Exhibit H - Council Minutes - February 9, 1984 Background Information on Current Rezoning Application Prior to the first City wide zoning in 1967, the property was used as a commercial marina and prior to that use, the property contained a small lakeshore resort. In 1967, the property was rezoned from Commercial to LR-lc-1. The City was sued thereafter by North Shore Drive Marina and lost the suit. The City’s actions were deemed arbitrary and capricious and the courts ordered the City to rezone the subiect property back to B-2. In 1974, the City once again rezoned the North Shore Drive Marina to LR-lC-1. The City's reasons for rezoning were founded in specific directives in the Comprehensive Plan, claims that access to site were dangerous for vehicular use, increased commercial use would intensify that traffic hazard and marina is surrounded by residential properties, in 1975, North Shore Drive Marina filed a lawsuit co*^testing the rezoning but nothing has been done by the plaintiff since the filing. ^ winter. North Shore filed a building permit application with order to build a repair shop 72' X 40'. The new structure will house the entire repair operation and the storage of all boats to be repaired. The applicant has provided a revised site plan locating all existing structures and the proposed repair shop. (Exhibit D) The new structure will be located 15' from the residentially zoned/used lot line. LR-lC-1 standards do not contain setbacks for commercially used buildings. The B-2 zone requires a 50' setback from residentially used lot lines. The applicant seeks a setback variance. Mr. Hork has been asked to delay on the setback application until the rezoning matter IS resolved. North Sh< February Page 2 Based on expansioi use is n< to resold plans fo] Conserval in the pi marina tc The City Shore Drj Council's At their Commissic property, be set aj B-2 zonir noted the in betwee rezoning an appro\ Staff Recc to approve B-2 and aj in betweer applicant Approval o on the fol 1. Suppoi 2. Rezoni use of Rezoni but pe The pr of the of the in the / was used as contained 5ned from florth Shore deemed arbitrary the subject led the North izoning were r claims that id commercial rrounded by la filed a lawsuit been done by jplication with new structure : all boats to be i locating all )it D) illy zoncd/used commercially I residentially Mr. Hork has rezoning matter 4 4 ^ -A- North Shore Drive Marina February 16, 1984 Page 2 existing zoning, the current application involves an expansion of coimtiercial/non-commercial use. Expansion of , L f • to'^resolve municipal zoning ordinance. The owner wishes uti,«ion, Council's Directive to the Planning Coitmiission Con,^?IsIorto"5:L?t thfB-2''re;on!n^tfr?"^^''"‘' Staff Recommendation to approve the rezoning of the North Shore Drive Marina from LR-lr i f,, B-2 and approve a future rezoning to B-2 of ? ^-R-lC-l to appUcr^rcar“ov?de%^^1ll?oV"^^^ 1. Proof that applicant »wrt^lrs/owns two acres in area 2. Proposed use is consistent with standards of B-2 zone oS^tSrL?low?ng'^l!nSin^sr «--- - based 1. Support of the surrounding property owners usrof"thrpro^rty“^ ‘=°"®^®bent with the current and historic Rezoning Will not intensify the commercial use of the land or shoreline but permit enforcement of the restrictive B-2 standards i‘ S: «s„"K„srs:;* %f i’Nt 4 'U Ml mm North Sh February Page 3 A condit the revi applicat and requ that thi improvem Planning consider 1.Revi for 2.Surv impr form 3.Surv Driv 4.Revi if w 'A:. s an ion-conforming ler wishes n, expansion linnetonka LMCD are re the ne in 1984. for North ocks. the Planning Drive Marina Marina would sideration. Council zoned property Ldered for /e plan for :iR-lC-l to roperty iture a is based It and historic I or shoreline >r rezoning the intent .s setforth i - i i f >t ■*. I f -.j 1 North Shore Drive Marina February 16, 1984 Page 3 A condition of this approval is that the Marina Committee the review of this application with the 1984 commercial application finding this body more qualified to deal with and requirements of the B-2 zone and LMCD. The applicant that this is a contract rezoning and that upon completion improvements this rezoning will be officially approved by continue with dock license the standards is hereby advised of certain the City Council. Planning Commission recommends the following for Marina Committee consideration: 1. Review minutes of February 9, 1984. Applicant must submit site plan for new structure where no variances are required 2.Survey of site showing location of Metropolitan sewer line, existing improvements, parking area, location of new repair shop, mature trees, formal landscaping 3. Survey showing new dock layout agreed upon by the LMCD and North Shore Drive Marina 4. Review B-2 zoning standards; specifically, screening requirements. See if we can work on a compromise to get rid of the "infamous blue fence". Resident 1160 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 5531 Resident 1080 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 5535 Resident 1040 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 5535< Resident 1000 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 5531 ."'.esident 560 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 -esioent Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 865 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3300 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 553 Resident 3067 Fairview Lan Long Lake, MN 553 Resident £25 Old Crystal Wayzata, MN 553< tee ial ith ant ion by continue with dock license the standards is hereby advised of certain the City Council. a Coiranittee t submit site plan wer line, existing shop, mature trees. LMCD and North Shore ng requirements. See infamous blue fence”. Ir - ^■W-v ■ 7 •,7 .,1 mf .ii Resident1160 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1080 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1040 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1000 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 V "esident 560 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 5^0 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 .*■ Resident S65 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3300 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3067 Fairview Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident S25 Old Crystal Bay Rd s ‘‘•=yzata, mn 55391 Resident 1140 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1070 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1030 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Gradon McCulley 125 North Inland Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Resident 990 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 900 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3400 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3250 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Reisdent 3059 Fairview Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 905 Old Crystal Bay Rd S Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1120 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1060 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1020 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 970 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 960 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 880 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3350 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3125 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3051 Fairview Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 M Maple Plain, MN 55359 Resident 3060 North Wayzata, Ml Resident 3090 North Wayzata, M Resident 3180 North ’Wayzata, M Resident 3190 North V.’ayzata, ^ Resident 3085 Nortl Wayzata, ^ Resident 3115 Nortl Vi’ayzata, ! Resident 3175 Nortl V.’ayzata, 1 Resident 3155 Nort 'Wayzata, Resident 1480 Bohn ’Wayzata , A ■ ■ •[ ■V wa Road MN 55356 wa Road MN 55356 '^a Road MN 55356 I Road MN 55356 ood Road MN 55356 ood Road ^N 55356 reet IN 55356 eet N 55356 w Lane N 55356 Resejrve ^oad 24 MN 55359 ^"' Resident 2840 North Shore Drive VJayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3060 North Shore Drive VJayzata, MN-55391 Resident 3090 North Shore Drive V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3180 North Shore Drive V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3190 North Shore Drive V.’ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3085 North Shore Drive Vvayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3115 North Shore Drive h’ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3175 North Shore Drive V.’ayzata, MN 55391 M' Resident 3155 North Shore Drive V.’ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1430 Bohns Point Road V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3020 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3080 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3120 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3186 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3017 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3095 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3135 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3185 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3165 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1500 Bohns Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3048 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3070 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3l60 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3188 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3065 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3105 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3145 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1406 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1420 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1520 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 % Resident 3200 North Shor h^ayzata, MN 553 A fc' ' Resident 3220 North Shori Wayzata, MN 553' Resident 3262 North Shor< V.’ayzata, MN 553‘ Resident -286 North Shore ■.-.’ayzata, MN 553S Resident -330 North Shore V.’ayzata, MN 5539 President 3366 North Shore ’.-.’ayzata, MN 5539 Resident 3282 North Shore ’.%’ayzata, MN 5539 Resident 3230 Bohns Point ’Wayzata, MN 5539; Resident 3225 Bohns Point V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1220 Tonkawa Rc long Lake, MN 5 orth Shore Drive a, MN 55391 orth Shore Drive a, MN 55391 snt lorth Shore Drive :a, MN 55391 ^nt ^orth Shore Drive ta, MN 55391 ent North Shore Drive ta, MN 55391 ent North Shore Drive ta, MN 55391 lent North Shore Drive ita, MN 55391 lent Bohns Point Road ata, MN 55391 dent Bohns Point Road ata, MN 55391 dent Bohns Point Road ata, MN 55391 / ' • V. Resident3200 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3220 North Shore Drive Kayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3262 North Shore Drive V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3286 North Shore Drive V.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3330 North Shore Drive '.-.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3366 North Shore Drive '.-.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3282 North Shore Drive '.-.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3230 Bohns Point Lane i*.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3225 Bohns Point Lane '.-.'ayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1220 Tonkawa Road long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3210 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3250 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3268 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3342 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3398 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3284 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3260 Bohns Point Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1535 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1200 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 3202 North Shore Drive .Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3260 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3290 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3332 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3350 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3264 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3220 Bohns Point Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 3265 Bohns Point Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1595 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1180 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 if: Resident 1540 Bohns P< Wayzata, MN ! Resident 1850 Palm CJL Stuart, FL 3 th Shore Drive MN 55391 th Shore Drive MN 55391 th Shore Drive MN 55391 :h Shore Drive MN 55391 :h Shore Drive MN 55391 :h Shore Drive MN 55391 s Point Lane MN 55391 s Point Lane MN 55391 s Point Road MN 55391 awa Road . MN 55356 ^-1 v^l -A. • mt V* y . ■ . y. • .. V J Resident 1540 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident 1580 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Resident850 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Resident 1850 Palm City Road Stuart, FL 33494 mm r ^ tenwood Road ke, MN 55356 /- X/>w /n s > . ♦ -c P\ • AO X 72 - I )I..' ‘ -1 ' c«» i r HC;■')f-24 X 42 ✓/|Th 12 X 12 PORCH ;Y STACK 16 'X I'f <-:;U n.s,D. 24.5 < .5 : i.. r=6o' /] M ra-V At'f !; T8f *• 4 'I ifi lA .:' ■ ' :! !■ ► >' ' * I. ‘Ai o^a/ 7., /9i^/ OfltOh^O (Zo/7]/yi/jsloAJ /3d^ S 6/I j)lajU ^ioAD C/^y^ST/Cc /Pf/J. SSS?/ MUMIB J"' I 71984 !!_■> CITY OF OROivC ui w----- % s T /O^hCt •*>' O'yx^^ ^^tXiA. y!rM‘^<>tj i 'X)0 S(v.<!’A' e C^'<i\i/e. UtA.>J mYa, Mi>/ iV3X/ t: p D s h t m I c 1 7. W(1 71984 !L> OROivC .(L^ ^'/y iVjy/ V.y7-.^p^y: ■ v\)v--^-'^-.....,,v 161984 ,i'ii i ✓ y i iyWOBOI r"' I December 29, 1983 Orono Planning Commission 1335 S. Brown Road Crystal Bay, KN 55391 Subject; NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARIKA Gentlemen: This letter is to support the request permit or rezoning of the property incluoing North Shore Drive Marina to allow them to build a 72 x 40 repair shop. It seems to me that the marina at North Shore, which has been there for years, is a fact of life and it would be to everyone's advantage to see as much improvement of the marina as possible. I can't imagine that the marina property will ever be converted to residential use. In the alternate, imagine many more undesirable uses for this property than it being used as a marina. Sincerely, Louis E. Navin 3265 Bohn's Point Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 LEM:jb ■■■. ■ ^mk iti .A.'■^^;*^^^ ;■ ■ j.i^.. & t Mrs. FREDERICK C. LYMAN 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD WAY2ATA. MINNESOTA 55381 February 12, 1984 I 4 1984 ‘-i. J^TV fJTop^n '"'■- -...._.V • ' «..•) V i ,< ; Planning Conunission City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553^3 Gentlemen: I am writing regarding the recent notice of Public Hearing on the matter of the City of Orono|s proposed rezoning of LaJceshore Residential Zoning District located between the east property line of Chaska Marina extending eastward to the east property line of North Shore Drive Marina. As I will be out of town on February 21, 1984, and not able to attend the Hearing, I wish to make a comment. I am not against your issuing a permit for Mr. Hork to build a new repair shop at his North Shore Marina, but I am concerned that a change to B—2 commercial zoning will bring in more large boats and commercialize the area more than it is already. There are two marinas in Maxwell Bay and I feel that very careful consideration should be given to this issue and the environmental impact it will have on the Lake, the residents, the plentiful wildlife and also on the traffic flow in the area. Sincerely yours. / Clara C. Lyman CCL:ml Vi ■'f* ■■ i} ♦ M. r ,P' 4 % iTr?- ‘I m " MINUTES OF THE OI Typical Section approval of OVERA DRAFT OF SUBDIVIS REGULATIONS PARK FEE FOR THE FRESHWATER FOUNDi toNCEPTUAL DIREC TO PLANNING COMM FOR CONS I DERATIO] COMMERCIAL ZONE . PUBLIC HEARING F( RBZONING 0F NORTI drive marina ated iing \fe 4. ork but will more Bay given ive on ilso 1 V ■ . _ '. in, A ' ^-. ■: ■:< ■:■■rfn-- ■{?!*»■ *»y■ .V1%- -•. • •"■iPilMII IlM i i -■ MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL'S SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 9, 1984.PAGE 3 Typical Section approval op overall draft op subdivision REGULATIONS PARK PEE FOR THE FRESHWATER FOUNDATION CONCEPTUAL DIRECTIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION OF B-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING OP NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA revLJd^nT®’^i,'^^°A the table had been anything Council if they wished to change Frahm moved, CounciImember Adams Citu Pnni the typical section as revised byCity Engineer Cook. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember Frahm moved. CounciImember Adams seconded, to approve the overall draft of the staterabove"'^^ subject to the amendments asStated above. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember Frahm felt that the Freshwater Foundation should pay the Park Fee of $3!800 Councilmember Adams felt that the Freshwater Foundation should pay the Park Pee. thrun^versltv n? m ‘=°"’e ^bomexchana^n^ Minnesota that it would be just exchanging tax payers money. Butler suggested putting the Park Fee on hold until the the Freshwater Foundation decides to develop the rest of that land. Councilmember Frahm stated that the money wouldn't from Fr°V''! “"^''^bsity of Minnesota but wo^ld cSme from ^beshwater Foundation, so it wouldn't be coming from the tax payers in the first place. secondir'"to''nor''®*’™ Councilmember Adamsseconded, to not waive any of the Park Fees for the total of $3,800 to bepaid in full. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0) 'boats or ho!f 1 any more Prato sLtedM r'’® allowed for any of the marinas, done too ^ screening from the lake should be jusrHofk^'rp?optrt “.‘‘’® actually rezone I .; f * to H:S-MINUTES OF W•iv H my: li' n r :>/-v:.; handicapped IAKEVIEW gol PRECINCT #3 adjournment s ATTEST: Alberta M. St 9, 1984. PAGE 3 table had been wished to change ilinember Adams lOn as revised by 4), Nays (0). ilmember Adams draft of the le amendments as (0). Lhe Freshwater >f $3,800. he Freshwater B is to come from would be just :ler suggested the Freshwater t of that land. money wouldn't but would come Ldn't be coming ce. Imember Adams :k Fees for the of $3,800 to be s (0). ' t want any more f the marinas, lake should be ctually rezone h . M4 t H- i)!. • •u- r. - • . minotes of the orono council- handicapped access lakeview golf course PRECINCT #3 adjournment 9:20 P.M ATTEST: S SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 9, 1984 PAGE 4 City could Just MlTkerTonTuggelte^^^ City fs lpo°t%%ning? aedLating-^ 10' o°rthl*' cL^stlrHf "L^rs'rafhfr'thln" d ^along the shoreline all IncIea*s“b"a?suU''orb^^^ 1'°“ "°t larger boats. =°»1<1 have Se r?zon7nr^" t:^h°uld^ree CTTTerra tor tie bulgln^^ PlLning7oLiIIiln is^that\h^‘^°'™"?"‘^®’'^°'’question of rezoninn ^ 77*’®!' “"ly consider the existing B-2 and that Property to enforce provisions wlt^ i i®^airected to strictly rezoning on a contract basis. “^*'*’ ®“®*’ CounciImember Frahm moved, Mayor But!.,- .. approve the handicapped acceL seconded, to addendum to the Lakevilw cllf 7our,7 • and Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (ol ® "" *’’^®®^"®t #3. aVj7ur77he 7pec7al°cSuncil"’‘’®’'/''®'’"' ®®®°"<l®d. to Motion, Ayes (^^NaysTo7 P-""- Mary c. Butler, Mayor ^berta M. Strom, City Clerk r 9, 1984. PAGE 4 B City could just neighbors could ' is spot zoning, k's property and for rezoning of ted that if the slips that the abject to Hork the City. ould rather see spread out all t you may not they could have should aorpp» ave to meet iKe riances. ndation to the y consider the a property to ed to strictly with such tr seconded, to agreement and n Precinct #3. m seconded, to at 9:20 p.m. «r. Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 14, 1984 Public Hearing - Public Review of Proposed Amendments to Zoning Code The amendments to the Zoning Code are minimal in number. The deadline for the codification of the municipal code will prevent major substantive amendments of the Zoning Code. The following amendments are required per Minnesota statutes. Exhibit A Item B below sets forth Council’s new policy for lots under common ownership. The amendment establishes new performance standards for existing lots of record. Note that Minnesota statutes require public hearings for conditional use permits and variances. In order to meet the deadline date for the legal publication date, all appl ications must now be filed a month before the scheduled hearing date - effective date April 1, 1984. Amendments and Additions Section 30.040 Add at the end of the definition section. Additional definitions unless specifically defined above, the words and phrases used in this zoning chapter shall have the meaning given to them in the subdivision chapter. Exhibit A ~ Common Ownership 1. Amend 31.301 - remove "under single separate ownership 2. Amend 31.203 as follows: Section 31.203. In "R" Districts of Greater Than One Acre and served by public sanitary sewer a lot of record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, which does not meet the requirements of this Zoning Chapter as to area or width only, may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the Council finds: (a) It is at least one acre in size, and the average width of the lot is at least 100 feet; (b) It is served by public sanitary sewer, (c) It otherwise meets the require ments of this Chapter or other applicable City Code provisions. Add new section Districts not served by public sanitary sewer. laments to deadline nt major nendments Blow sets liip. The ig lots of rings for ! deadline wbe filed Apri1 1, bove, the have the ership s Acre and " District meet the only, may ses if the e in size, (et; : sanitary i require- ovisions. »i> • fto'i!" t .vt- 'M-i ^ »■ • \ *•; i ;. iiiitf^riirnrrVVrY fii ri^'' y ^ w A lot of record in any "R" District in the City not served by public sanitary sewer must meet the area and width requirements of the Zoning Code and shall not be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes without Council approval. Add new section The separation by the transfer or sale of non conforming, undeveloped lots not served by public sanitary sewer, aligned in a contiguous arrangement, undivided by a public or private road or road easement and under same or common ownership is not permitted without Council approval. Council approval is not required if the separation of such lots results in individual building sites that satisfy the area and width requirements of the Zoning Code, Exhibit B Amend Section 32.100 as follows Section 32.100 P, (^) d by publ ic ints of the y detached informing, aligned in ivate road ip is not /al is not Individual rements of l. , , ;. ■ • ^iCSrr- Commission. ofticio non-voting member of the Planning .160 _ _ _ ^^ode rnmmj of appeals and adjustments. The Planninq Commission is constituted as the Board of Appeals InT Councu!" <3ecisions of the Board are advisory to the Boa.a Adjustments. The 1.Adjustments. Appeals to the board of appeals and adjustments may be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any of the conditions imposed by the zoning ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments has the following powers with respect to the zoning ordinance: respect a)To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer the the enforcement of the zoning ordinance. b)To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where V enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated keeping with the intent of the ordinance. "Undue connection with the granting or a variance means; ^ ^ 1)The property is question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. 3)The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 4)Economic considerations alone shall not hardship if reasonable “■ 3 '"-.a I- h: I! h ^ i mm the Planning ;ode nning to the ents. The to the board any affected 3itions 3 of appeals Lth respect > alleged requirement, jment of the le literal :es where indue [ue to the >n, and to emonstrated 'ith the Undue he granting e put to a itions e to rty not t alter the ty. 11 not easonable the terms ■ -V'A V'* : ■iiiiir 2. 3. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statute Section 116J.06, sub. 2, when in harmony with the ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments or the City Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. 7) i V The board or City Council may permit as variance the temporary use of a one-fami dwelling as a two-family dwelling. The Beard o^City Council may impose conditions in granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. Subdivisions. Appeals to the board of appeals and adjustments may be taken by any affected person uern compliance with any reasonable conditions imposed by the subdivision regulations. The board of appeals and adjustments has the following powers with respect ro the subdivision regulations: a) b) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirer.ent, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of rhe subdivision ordinance. To hear requests for varying the regulations as they apply to specific properties where an ur.-sual hardship on the land exists, but variances xty be granted only upon the specific grounds set ftrth in the subdivision regulations. Unusual hardship includes, but is not limited to, inadequate -.z~qss to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Official Map. After an official map is adopted, designating locations for future land that is nee i for future street purposes and as sites for other necessary public uses, if a permit for a building such location is denied, the board of appeals and adjustments shall have the power, upon appeal file with it by the owner of the land, to grant a perm: building in such location in any case in which the board finds, upon the evidence and the arguments presented to it. eu • • A for t/ ISM is not . direct . Variances red Ota Statute harmonv with nts or the variance any lie ordinance e affected mit as a ne-fami Iv ions in and to als and rson uptn mposed by appeals and aspect to allege i equirer.ent , snt of the ations as B an un-5ual aces may be set fcrth al hardship luate ar less stems. pted , is neeied other ilding in Ls and al filed i permit for ich the nent s That the entire property of the appellant of which such area identified for public purposes forms a part cannot yield a reasonable return to the owner unless such a permit is granted; and That balancing the interest of the municipality in preserving the integrity of the official map and of the comprehensive municipal plan and the interest of the owner of the property in the use of his property and in the benefits of ownership, the grant of such permit is required by considerations of justice and equity. In addition to the notice of hearing required by Minnesota Statutes Section 462.354, subd. 2, a notice shall be published in the official newspaper once at least ten days before the day of the hearing. If the board of appeals and adjustments authorizes the issuance of a permit the City Couoncil shall have six months from the date of the decision of the board to institute proceedings to acquire such land or interest therein, and if no such proceedings are started within that time, the officer responsible for issuing building permits shall issue the permit if the application otherwise conforms to local ordinances. The board shall specify the exact location, ground area, height and other details as to the extent and character cf the building for which the permit is granted. Appeal Procedures. The applican officers of the City affected, m written notice stating the actio stating the specific grounds upo made. The notice shall be accom amount prescribed by the current payable to the City, which fee s - or other person or ay appeal by filing a n appealed from and n which the appeal is panied by a fee in the City fee schedule hall not be refundable. Review by Council. The Council may review and revise any decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. In reviewing such de>'ision, the Council shall be guarded by the same outhcrity a.-.i guidelines set forth in this section. Hearings by the bonrd of appeals and adjustments shell 1 be held within sucli time and upon such notice to interested parti.- 3 as follows: (See old variaiv;t' .'.«vnguage) 3848j ellant of which poses forms a rn to the owner d municipality in icial map and and the ty in the use of ownership, d by uired by . 2, a notice aper once at ring. If the zes the hall have six the board to nd or interest started within ssuing building plication The board area, height haracter of the er person or 1 by filing a ed from and the appeal is i a fee in the e schedule be refundable. 5w and revise Adjustments. shall be ines set forth jstnents shfill ■>tice to ;VN . ♦ ;t ; I . 5' - rP'^' V- V 'f '■r 3848j The board shall within a reasonable time make its order deciding the matter and shall serve a copy of such order upon the appellant or petitioner by mail. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. Subject to such limitations as may be imposed by the City Council, the board may adopt fules for the conduct of proceedings before it. Such rules may include provisions for the giving of oaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefs by the parties. The board shall provide for a record of its proceedings which shall include the minutes of its meetings, its findings and the action taken on eac]i matter heard by it, including the final order. <1 r i •4- r V * r, Appeal: the Boc adviso: reques* Ad justr upon t develoi Council diffici impar ir Appeals var ianc propose Counci] and Ad' The Boi Sectior officic Any par For the mailing names a situate the var address respons proceed propert proceed subdivi Subject Board m< rules m< the fill for a re meeting includi shall effect the cor air, d< of proi Counci o f the cause i proper ke its order Df such ail. Any c by agent 5 may be adopt fules Such rules ths to by the Drd of its of its on each er. rt. "V, V V9!m ^« 3 3 d Section 32.330 - Variances: Reference to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Planning Commission is constituted as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The decisions of the Board are advisory to the Council. Before authorization of any variances, the request therefor shall be referred to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for study concerning the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Municipal Plan and on the character and development of the neighborhood; and for its recommendation to the Council for the granting of such variance so as to relieve such difficulties or hardship to the degree considered reasonable without imparing the intent and purpose of the Zoning Chapter. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments shall recommend such conditions related to the variance regarding the location, character, and other features of the proposed building, structure, or use as it may deem advisable. The Council by unanimous action may waive reference to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Board shall hold hearings as required by Minnesota Statutes 462.354 Subdivision (2) . A notice shall be published in the official newspaper once at least ten days before the day of the hearing. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney! For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 150 feet of the property that requires the varaince. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the nature shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made. Subject to such limitations as may be imposed by the City Council, the Board may adopt rules for the conduct of proceedings before it. Such rules may include provisions for the giving of oaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefs by the parties. The Board shall provide tor a record of its proceedings which shall include the minutes of its meetings, its findings and the action taken on each matter heard by it, including the final order. Section 32.340 Variances: Issuances. considering applications for vairance, the Council advice and recommendation of the Board and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. Before granting a variance, the Council shall hear requests for variances from the literal provisions instances where their strict enforcement would ause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual proper y under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it 7 >¥ Kim > • . • S ■ '-■l- : t. L: ■..-.hr J -r s • '* ■ *. is demc intent the gr Th va Pr Add new Section provisi filed w the Cou Subdivi order i; propert validi t 32 Commiss applica hearing )oard of tuted as oard are ces, the als and ^ariance ter and 1 to the (ve such without Board of id to the ts of the e. The Appeals Ita tutes d in the tear ing. torney, ble for line the >roperty equires ers and ► by the i of the ividual late the th this :il, the • Such sses and provide s of its d by i t, Council and the Lfare of Ight and 1 values ice, the visions t would ividual when i t % ;0v', : .vTt ■ Pi \ A •• I cv’-' is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with tne granting of a variance means; A) The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. B) ^ The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. C) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. D) Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. E) Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutue Section 116J.06, sub. 2, when in harmony with the ordinance. F) The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the City Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person’s land is located. G) The Board or City Council may permit as a varaince the temporary use of a one-family dewlling as a two-family dwelling. ^ The Board or City Council may impose conditions in granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. Add new section after 32.371 to read as follows: Section 32.371. Acertified copy of every variance granted under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358 and 462.359 shall be filed with the Hennepin County recorder. Variances filed with with the County Recorder pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 462.36 Subdivision (1) do not constitute encumbrances on real property. The order issued by the City shall include the legal description of the property involved. Failure to file a variance shall not affect its validity or enforceability. Amend Section 32.450 as follows: 32.450. Conditional Uses: Hearings and Notice. The Planning hearing, shall be given not less than ten (lH) days or more than thirty r .. . . . .Ill '4 ' 1 > 1.- I ‘i; K1 7 ' . • ’ •,r (30) offic descr and p] the Ci the pi land i respo deter list c attes recor indi V inval wi th Plann state perti cond i may af such Commi befor to wit shall minut matte Counc for o evide condi and t Compr condi opera safet impro compi grant as th >irit and ion with asonable official nstances i/ner. ssential itute an f exists I ted to, energy leltered Section ince. Council irmi tted lere the Lnce the ►-family iting of id jacent ider the shall be ith with 462.36 y. The n of the :ect its lanning on each public 1 thirty Hi 5 ( If % W I V "tJ (30) days prior to the date of the hearing by publication the the official newspaper for the City. Such notice shall contain the description of the land and the proposed conditional use and the time and place of the hearing. At least ten (10) days before the hearing, the City Clerk shall mail an identical notice to the owner and to each of the property owners within 350 feet of the outside boundaries of the land in question. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made. At the public hearing the Planning Commission or Council shall review the application and the statements and drawings submitted therewith and shall receive pertinent evidence concerning the proposed use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. Subject to such limitations as may be imposed by the Council, the Planning Commission or Council may adopt rules for the conduct of proceedings before it. Such rules may include provisions for the giving of oaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefs by the parties. The City shall provide for a record of the proceedings which shall include the minutes of the meetings. The findings, and the action taken on each matter heard including the final order. F) Amend Section 32.460 as follows: Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 32.460. Conditional Uses: Granting of Permit. A. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council maygrant a conditional use permit as the use permit was applied for or in modified form, if on the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the City makes the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. B. A conditional use permit may be revokable, may be granted for a limited time, or may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. long as t section controls shall be county o conditio: property tion the the contain the and the time the hearing, ind to each of aries of the B, the person :e records to * notice and a sent shall be part of the id notice to e shall not pt to comply hearing the tion and the all receive :he proposed Any party Subject to :he Planning proceedings ring of oaths s. The City . include the aken on each nance No, 172 e: 1-1-75 mi t • mend and the Lt was applied ation and the lings: on of the oning Chapter > located and on of the it would be ublic health, roperties or tal use will ning Chapter • . j?*. ^ use permit shall remain in effect as ^ if ^®*^^*tions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this ? shall prevent the City from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. u r-, ^ ?• ^ certified copy of any conditional use permit snail be filed with the county recorder or registrar of titles of the county or counties in which the City is located for record. The conditional use permit shall include the legal description of the property included. /O GROUND the pr« shall proper publis Sectio easeme being and St manner other 1 adjace space record WM3ESBi ain in effect as nothing in this Ending official >nal use permit )f titles of the >r record. The ;ription of the G)Amend Section 32.700 as follows: SEC. 32.700. VACATION OF STREETS, ALLEYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this Chapter, except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. The Council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve". /( mmm A Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator February 16, 1984 #811 - John Ericson - 1620 Shadywood Road - Variance Application - Separate Combined Lots and Create a Buildable Lot Zoning District - LR-IC List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Survey Exhibit C - Plat Map The applicant is requesting that two lots, which are legally combined be separated so t- at the vacant lot can become a buildable lot. This^ IS a variance application at this time to allow Planning Commission to make some conceptual decisions before requiring applicant to qo through the entire subdivision/platting process. Variances Required Lot Area Lot Width Existing House Side Setback Required Parcel "A"Parcel 21,780 sf With existing house Proposed % Variance Proposed *16,200 *26%*19,500100’* 60 *40%* 65 10 '* 3’*70%mm mm II n IIB *10% *35% *Staff estimate - not given by applicant The applicant has not provided a complete survey showing the actual separate lot lines, structural setbacks, etc. and the application cannot be thoroughly reviewed without this information. However, there is a roa er question here which must be addressed by Planning Commission and Council before this application is further reviewed. That question is now that common ownership lots are to be considered individually rather than as a combined building site", how do we treat the property owner who has already combined his lots? ^^5 re^irin °th^t combined,^forcinra'^later^subdivisio^ should we now use for the "un-combining" of combined lots’ Do we treat them as individual lots and go with the 80% standard? or do we penLiz^the property owner who previously combined and now has to subdivide and mLt ji*' I >: -■ #811 - Johr February 16 Page 2 100% to acc standard, e separation Also, what lot line? 3' of the i buildable, for the exj If we do fc line, are v area or wic Or do we i the City? unattractiv would creat To sum up, to create t Under a "de considered, new subdivi Staff recom conceptual situation, considerate policy to o Planning Co; applicant i would be ap; 1) Applica; a) b) c) d) e) exi. pro] the loc. (ga; cer- all Since ai for the proposec .nistrator - Variance le Lot lly combined, e lot. This Commission ant to go Parcel "B” Proposed % Variance *19,500 * 65 *10% *35% the actual lication cannot , there is a Commission and t question is, Ldually rather roperty owner 2d that substandard subdivision and :d. But for 80% of the standard )o we treat them penalize the iivide and meet '•iV M mm . . . #811 - John Ericson February 16, 1984 Page 2 « • rj 4 ■i 100% to accomplish the same purpose? Should we now require a single standard, across the board, for both individual separate lots and for the separation of combined lots? Also, what about houses which are very close to a proposed or existing lot line? (Ericson's is such a situation). Where a house sits within edge of one lot, and the request is to make the adjacent lot buildable, do we force a subdivision or plat to create reasonable setbacks for the existing house? or, do e allow the substandard setback to exist? If we do force a subdivision beu«ivise a house is near (or even over) a lot line, are we willing to create gerrymandered lot shapes to meet lot area or width standards? Or do we ’ ly totally on the limitations of lakeshore hardcover to protect the City? It likely that many "creatable" lakeshore lots would be unattractive from a practical standpoint because hardcover limitations would create very limited building envelopes. To sum up, do we want to set a precedent by allowing a "de-combination" to create two substandard lots where one conforming lot now exists? Under a "de-combination", should lots combined for tax purposes be considered, as separate lots, having to meet 80% of the standards or as a new subdivision having to meet 100% of the standards? Staff recommends that Planning Commission table this application and request conceptual direction for the Council on what standards to apply to this situation. The Planning Commission should outline the important considerations so Council can make a determination how to adjust current policy to cover items of this nature. Once Council has made a determination Planning Commission should then request further information from the applicant in order to complete a thorough review. The following conditions would be appropriate at that point: 1) Applicant must submit a detailed certificate of survey showing: a) b) c) d) e) existing property boundaries proposed property boundaries the location and setbacks of all existing structures, proposed location and setbacks of any existing structures to be relocated (garage) certification of lot area and width for both proposed lots all existing and proposed hardcover, including driveways Since applicant has submitted a set of plans for a specific house for the new lot, applicant is advised it would be prudent to locate the proposed house on the survey also. "T'rt. - 1 'V' 1 ■''fi ' 4: r !f» ^ m m m lil #811 - Februa] Page 3 3)Apj be 4)Apf be app 5)App the For fut statist Not Hen the; 17 < 16 < the 0.11 the in ( and the the 19 c 12 c With the 0.45 and 16 of th 15 of th In the e north of 47% 26% Now, let study, bi Range Averag Ericso 13 17 12 Lre a single 5 lots and for the sed or existing ise sits within \e adjacent lot reasonable setbacks setback to exist? even over) a lot to meet lot irdcover to protect lots would be ^er limitations 'de-combination'' now exists? >urposes be standards or as a )lication and request :o apply to this Important :o adjust current made a determination :ion from the following conditions rey showing: :ures, proposed > to be relocated >posed lots Iriveways specific house rudent to locate the — John Ericson February 16, 1984 Page 3 brgran2ed^%pDulInt''shL?''S"^' *"’• ^2'= variances applioatioA seoa^aS frnm to file a new subdivisionseparate from this variance application t^e^SuLbUurifhis'Lts" limitation nu>y affect s?atfsticl mlghr^^heapplicatior., the following i::s;iS2,‘jsi,rs5 17®of residences fronting on Crystal Bay the average lot size of these 16 is 0.54 acre and area “t^dardrof\hrzonInf dist^iif" I PeTage^"l^?y“-f 19 of 31 are smaller than 0.44 acre 12 of 31 are 0.44 acre or larger : 0^45 aUd o!37°lcres^respectiv;iy^® lots would be approximately IS nf li lots are 0.37 acre or smaller 15 of the 31 are larger than 0.37 acre SI ES: KSEESE ee: eseeee eee: s.-js .-ee: s?udy^®Lt forjhr3i°prope.xlernoted"atov2:^''“ district Range in lot widths - 45'-150' Average width - 84 •(t,R-ic zoning district requires 100 • I Ericson-s proposal :Lot A - 60*; Lot B _ iOO > - 17 of 31®,k» 2°i®<’.P'^®''iously are 60' wide or less 1' or 31 are 75* wide or greater - 12 of 31 meet 100* width or greater standard^Lr^each^lot!"^^^ still meet the minimum 100*lot width k. . u k f I f♦ * » A • *• *-5 I ns I i if 9 t C‘ j - I C T? ^ g I > O A«I < • CO O/i area variances area variances lew subdivision :ion may affect Jatior', the following ad between the :-lC zoning district: al Bay e one tax statement g sites is the lot width ^•18 - 1,00 acre % •' #s'f H- : • •‘4 r4 5uld be approximately roughly everything ig Crystal Bay Road): zoning district 100' lot width mi «■ .. Sr: m ifi i-/. :v-.cc jnr IHL*; :,*.;,.4444 7/Ci. EXHIBIT 'f •iw.r; ESS1 A tGv'vA <5Uj 235-72L-j SUSvE'V FOR JOH2J ERICSON SURVEY OF: Lot 3, Lot 4, anJ the South 5.00 feet of m- SHADY WOOD, aocoraing to the recorded plat thereo^ Hennepin County, Minnesota. tntreo.., 1 I fl- >•*' ’ •/ k . ' 'G' * i ‘ O• ••«. • • ^ ^ ■ it ■ :4 m ^Uj^y.st_2 3. 197r R.- f - 10535bCi.eiUc .G. Pci2r}c02r ------- “-‘i ^v j j ^ ii *■' ST Nct'c-Ai,- i, cirv ^ IGA A 51 i) 295-7213 t Of Lot id plat thereof. I -------- ^•v ..w . ^ f d by rr.f: &»ginscr i ,1ft ;t 9 ~..mi *wp. •••• .5^. *• <r. EX!ilBiT_ « •*^ /13 /l2 S (P »/ .d5 6 2 I/ I P/I5 ;il uj (40 (V‘ •2 / n / *' / 10 •> ^ V • » t •♦I 2 23 .24 25 26 27 20/' 29 30 r> T5tnP^^*lvd/?tVi?5577-----anvncr 1 ! (iO w »>4l1 ^ ^ ^ Oi .. , ..n m m ^ •• •• 1 »i « ^ 1 •«4M Hfr\ 'ft A 3? I O') C««,):oV ! V^'I3*-1 4- *:,■ ■? /ILL lO'-' hr,' '-•'V. J t ! 'il:j-!-i-.i^.:______\/U ' P / -r- ^y)✓ a •1-•/ OSoo ). ;. 1 ^ ^ ^ 1 (}») 1 MAPLEGAT ^.•1! l”.Ci •A i («» 5 J'i4 I I ' 6 o !• i • * f C 7 'f- / 8 fl f / (iO r- ::a s / c/ » / •A ® I*’•V . !T (• <• sV> aN O Q.//5 4% • If / •n:ss t^rs; .1' ••*• ‘‘*•• • P %(w^. J.3 V4M, - / / / -7' -"1-// A,-/J>- I 'f .■.; ilU. sn\ • i5^-rv I* IT:. -V * . .• [Mi-!, *,!>■ - if- Applicat. List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit The app 58* fro applica 75' set] further result of the ; net art existii propose net are existir propose The lot Applicar garage c is unknc that the garage" In order t< Planning o TO •Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator February 15, 1984 SUBJECT. #812 - Alan McDowell - 905 Ferndale Road West - Variance Application - Variance to lakeshore setback requirements - concurrent reduction of total hardcover proposed concurrent List of Exhibii-.c; Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Survey- Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit E : S?“p^qfeievatiL%°'^' hardcoverExhibit F - siaff ILtir hardcover calculations Ib' ?-m1he"\ik%sh^“l"bi?^eere1istLrhL1i^ "applicant proposes to build an enoincc./i^ rdcover. In addition, the 75- setback and is located ™®ets the further plans on removin^po^tiiL ora"hirdcoSer^^‘'°°''"" ’ result is proposed as a 2M ^ ^ f hardcover terrace. The net of the lake. ^®^^^tion in hardcover within 75' “ net area within 75' of lake rouqhlv , . - existing hardcover (rouah ..Jlu * ' * I * * 1 * ,*................ acres: Kf ;i St;: tf !s::;:: i;i! existing hardcover 75-250' from lakr* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . proposed hardcover 75-250* from lake!.*. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . .±27.0% (no change) IpplicLi\^s'not “niicfte^ ^tetLr'hr^ development, garage once the new one is constructed Thf removing the old that the nonconforming structure desiona<-<a2 k consider requiringgarage" be removed. ^ designated by applicant as "existing ^ In order to recommend approval of the varianr'#:^ i u u Planning Commission would have to make the findings ri«orth"!r‘'f2!'340 (a-e). inistrator West - Variance - concurrent lardcover IS to be located addition, the ich meets the . Applicant . The net r within 75' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2.0 acres ±7.6% ±7.3% 0.65 acre . .±27.0% ±27.0% (no change) alopment. 5ving the old this structure isider requiring »s "existing re setback, rth in 32.340 (a-e). GORDON R. CO ENGINEERS S LANt LONG LAKE, MINNE Xis !' ^ • *5 e i €0 2 vU % ■ I <0cto q:r> O) Q 2: o <0 UJ 0} CO QC Ul UJ $ 5 Uj UJ: rH G3 O 2;o =ife . o> O S •! 1 f Is*1 w i 1 « i ■ > . i V- r- S?* h 1 O r • 1 S 5 2o <0 uj 2 lu <c -J o o -J s; £ K S j > I • • '^1rm' mm :i 5 i JS' T 11 111 % * Ap ft uJ % o ! i» ; •* t I* I *. • .. n- ?r s , ^ i: f j ) I ». - ' 4 ■j . '■••. jsr .•'. • .'* ^ i I % ^ tiiBi'. ■•1i ■ ^ ,v r-i'i »: > i X*'•!■’ 1^ X ^<A it Ju 4T 3 .o* ^ oto<o W in co‘OC^ ^ \l *• II |l M (I ^ ^ N. ^ ^ X X X y X X to V s V V III • • I • ^ CO o p Ui ^ in n 4i ) =J 1 1 1 1 1 f •• • « 1 1••• • S ^ •1 1 1 ----------------------------- ______________1__^__• T 1 1!.. Ul 1 MMIIO 1 t j 1 1LL_Ikl 1->c —. 1 « 1 • •X 1 < ! • * i 1___mm 1 ,------------ 1 t ^ • 1 _* i t —•• 1------------------ 1 1 M & : * ______ 1 *P* 1 ^ w V —7 1 m Ir.3t fc m M-------------LJ-L \--------------------------UU 0 4 *c.' ;s\ . ]o 1!iPK :V ■ r'^ 4 ., r jt- • \ t : t. 4 <! ■ ^ ^ 1i t'i^i fc.i ■ f 'll- U'r :•■■ ''' s I x^'\* ' L- ;^:.v^-;-;X ^ ; * ^713 or* 4 J Ih V\ 01 Q =tfe i !5 s of^ t< y ^: Jl1 e ^ iN !|liui V- li i«;ii'