HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-15-1976 Planning Packet,‘r*.
&
•• . •
'H#
A nr:: ii a
PL'\;c:i:;r: co?"^issio:': of :io\'n ’niER 15, io76
OrOMO riiT IIM.,L - 7:50 IVI.
I.aiRPJi'rr iTii^K
A.Action Itcins
1.
2.
3.
-1.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
13.
Call to Order
^193 - Public Hearing •• 7:30
Lonp I.ake Park I^nd Offer - Bnico Bay ton
If 192 - Pul)lic ilearino - 7:‘'t5 n.m.. »
N’avarre Area Rezoninp 0 Zoninf» Ordinance Amendnent
'linutes of Regular Meeting of Movember 1, 1976
#164 - Robert .Tolinson - 1121 I'lmood Avenue
Variance - Lot Area ’.v’idth (if submitted)
#188 - Steve Mallack (T.M.C. Corporation) - 4100 Sixth \vcnuo N'.
Subdivision (Preliminary)
#190 - Robert Solie - 1085 Mofth Arm Drive
Conditional Use Permit - Crading and Filling
#194 - David Butler - 4685 Mortli Shore Drive
Variance - Lot Area and Lot Width
#195 - ’Warren Ortenblad - 2799 Casco Point Road
Variance - Lot Widtii, Side Setback, Lakeshore Setback
Compared to Adjoining Div'cllings
#196 - LtWin Kuglin - 2514 Sliady\\rood Road
Variance - Add Garage to N’on-Con forming Lot and Side Yard
T( Street Setback
#197 - Curt Jenson - 2700 Fthel Avenue
Variance - Lot Area F( Side Yard Setback for Addition to
Mon-Conforming Structure
#192 - Additional Navarro Area Rezoning
Comprehensive Server Plan
B.Work Session Items
1.#198
2.#199
3.#200
4.#201
-Gar>' F. ^fondale - 1965 Countr)' Club Roac^
Variance - Lot Area 0 V/idth for Addition to Existing Structure
-^Irs. Robert Gasd\ - 1050 Tonka\\'a Road
Variance - 12’ Fence (Stnicture) Zero Feet From Side Lot Line
-Victoria Grain Exdiange ( Brauer .Associates)
Mortli -Arm Drive
Subdivision (Preliminary)
-.lames .^!cClear>’’ - 5445 Baysidc Road
Conditional Use Permit Rcnlace All Existing Structures on
Property '.Vitli One Stnicture Equal to
'Hiis Total Area
Agenda
^^Page 2
.ovember 1, 197o
5. ^202 - Harrison Jolinston, Jr. - 925 VH.llo’.-; Drive South
Conditional Use Pcmit Variance - Dredging E:ci sting Pond
Dor Duck Pond
6. #205 - James Snyder - 1085 Iferitage Lane
Variance - Lot '‘Hdth Area 0 Side Yard Setback for Hoiuse
Addition - Variance Drom 26* Mnrshland Setback
7. #204 - Richard Keaveny - 3^25 Siiorcline Drive
Variance - Front Setback - Sign Location
C. Incomplete Items
II. CO>!PLLTIiD TTI-MS FOR COUNCIL
A. Completed Items
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
# 95
#172
#177
#182
#187
#189
# 98
Fred Lucas - 2055 Sixtii Avenue N,
Subdivision (Final) - Concurred
Hugh Harrison - 1505 Sixth Avenue N.
Subdivision (Final) - Concurred
C. Raymond q Piith V'olfe - 2925 Casco Point Road
VLariance - Side Yard - Conairred
Ld Leliman - 3527 Sliorelinc Drive
Subdivision (Preliminai*)’’) - Concurred
Hanley Larson - 1342 Rest Point Circle
l^ariance - Carage Side Yard r, Street Setback - Concurred
linicc Peterson - 2447 Carman Street
Variance - ix)t Area, Width, Setback - Conairred
David KniskojV - 1200 VHldluirst Trail
Su])division (Final) - Concurred
B. Incomplete Items
1. #162 - Holidav Station Stores - 3440 Slioreline Drive
Conditional Use Permit fj Variance - Tabled
*7
i
■
% ^
I
vri
’’pi's
• ij
f-
i
i •
i
$X
1
TO:Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator
FROM;Dick Benson, Village Administrator <1
DATE;November 10, 1976
SUBJECT:Dayton Park Property ?!u
♦{
Concerning the public hearing the Planning Commission will be
chairing on the Dayton property donation to the City for park
purposes, it should be noted that the purpose of accepting this
generous offer is to provide additional park lands to Orono*s
neighborhood park concept.
The City of Orono is very anxious to add this property to our
total park properties which will be determined at a later date
as to the specific uses that will be applied to this unique area.
't
If.
■fa
iV
& . .vf
^
i
■ r f •
vw - • ;•»
♦ »
■‘:V* ■
f.
L'
V
•■': ■.,
4- ■• ■t. r-v
i' .■*■ •
■i:-
vi*
sr 4 •.
‘-.i. -
;i ' .f»'
’,r-^ .
; '•*' ■'
4 i.i*•
«
•4,U ^ •
< •
• <V •
I 4 •
4 »
«k
I.** ‘‘r
♦* > rt Tn1 A 'h
yf. •'.
: -U;
/ . '
X '>-'
' ’♦ 1
I. : ‘"
ri^-1 ?•:.;>
-t ^
» • *• , 4
* •Vv.'*^» 1I r.-A.*'.
#193
TO:Mr. W. R. Benson, Administrator
Hr. Walt Lathrop, Park Conmission Chairman
FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Supervisor
DATE:August 6, 1976
SUBJECT: Bruce Dayton property. East Long Lake Road
In July, 1976 Mr. Benson requested that I look into the
property at 455 East Long Lake Road. It is my understanding
that Mr. Dayton would like to give this property to the
City of Orono for park use.
The property is five acres, of which approximately 60X is
heavily wooded. In the wooded area there is .6 acre wet*
lands. There is 500 feet of lakeshore. In checking with
some of the local people they stated it is the best swimming
beach on the lake.
Also on this property is one very old single family dwelling
and one small beach house. I talked to Mr. Bernard Statema,
the caretaker for Mr. Dayton, and he recommended razing the
buildings.
The 1976 market value is $63,000, and the taxes for this
year are $1,834.28.
The cost for razing the buildings is approximately $1,500.
. i
'i
« •
1
1
r'.
i'>ick T'cnson, (Mtv .Vb".inistrator
i.aiik 'fuliidi, ZoniiuT \t^.nini;^trntor JL
J^bMiJLCr:
!^ovonlx?r Z, IPTf*
..'avarrc Aren ^ezonin*’
’
I
lae notice for !icarinp rcf^anUnj ’, t:ic lavarre Area P.ezoninf, and Zoning Code
anendnent lias !>een sent to tlio Fm .ewsnaner for ;niMication. Tno Public Hearing
is scliediiled for 7:4S p.p. on \’ovoi'’'x?r 1T>, 1076. '!”ic nrorK?rties 'icing consilerc'!
for rczonini^ are only tbnse three viiicli ’.'cre nnrt of the agreement stinulations
between attorney ’s on tlie h’avarro Area Idtigation natter. Tiie stinulations also
included comileHon of the entire process by Moverber 20, 1076 (as noted in circled
paragrap ’i of enclosed copy of letter 6ron oiir attomev ’s office).
Oiir notice of Ihiblic !'earing docs not incliule rozonin^’ of any otlier ‘.'avarre
properties as no final I’ecision u’as ever na<ie as to '^xactlv v/hat properties should i(
be re zoned.
Once we deteirdne exactly wliat other ”*roperties ’.’c ’.'ant to rezone, the Planning
Commission will hold another I'ublic "earing on t!ie matter.
COICICIL- .:over.her f. Td?6
Council infomed of nroercss o^ rezoning. Council referred nuestion of detepiiriiw
anv otlicr proposed rezoninp of '’avarr' area to nai ’nin«’ Co riission and instructed
Staff to continue ’;ith nccessar' procedures.
»
I i
• 1
nfmrnAtrfTint
cm OF ORCNO, MINNESOTA
REQjLAR PIANNING CCFMISSIGN MEEETING HELD NOVBIBER 1, 1976
^le Orono Planning Conmission met on the above date with the
following mBobers present: Chairwoman Diane Dunlap, Members
George Hosfield, Brad Van Nest, John Guthrie, John Hake,
Gloria McDonald, Paul Pesdc, and Zoning Administrator Hank Muhich.
Chairwoman IXmlap announced that this was the time and place
for a Public Hearing on the petition of Steve Wallack (T.M.G.
Corporation) for a sti>division of property located at 4100
Sixw Avenue North. The Zoning Administrator presented the
Notice of Public Hearing and the Affadavit of Publication.
The Zoning Adninistrator stated tiiat a previous proposal
submitted in 1974 consisted of 54 lots. The applicant is
now submitting a revised proposal for 14 lots. This is
quite an inprovement. The total dry buiidable area for
this plat is 68.41 acres vhich is 97.731 of the required
^ appear to be at least 300» wide at
the balding site and projected locations appear to meet
all minimum setback recpiirements.
Jfr. and the developer, Bruce Grivna, were present.
The Planning CommissiQn asked the applicant if he had coa
sted Hennepin County regarding the proposed location of
the curb cuts and what effects this subdivision would have
on the future plans for Coimty Road 6. Mr. Wallack stated
he ww not aware of the fact that the subdivision was to be
sUomitted to the Comty for their review. At the time of
TO last proposal, the rerouting of Hi^ay 12 was discussed,
out TOre was no mention of the rerouting of County Road 6.
The Planning Conmission was concerned about how much land
in this subdivision was in the flood plain and also how much
was acTOl wetl^ in relation to^hat is indicated on the
™ Planning Conmission felt that a report should be
oMawed ^i^pm the Hennepin County Conservation District or
TO Jtodiaha Creek Watershed District and Hickok 6 Associates.
The finance states that this cost, if any, would be absoibed by the developer.
Also present at this meeting were quite a few surrounding
omers. The following came forward to identify
themselves: Marie Peterson, Mr. 8 Mrs. Maurice Swanson,
C^^lo Carruthers (name not included on the Abstractor’s
Wst), Mr. 8 Mrs. F. Joe Thompson, C. E. Larson, Robert
Gwiman and Qirt Hagfors. They were interested in seeing
TO map of this proposed subdivision. Robert Gehiman,
TOse property adjoins Lot 9 of the Subdivision, stated
that this area is marshy in the spring. Bill Greenwood
MinTO out to the Planning Comiiission the areas which
he felt were wet and those that were dry. Mr. Curt
Hagfors related that this proposed area has a high water
ATTENDANCE - 7:30 P.M.
SIEVE WALLACK (T.M.G.)
4100 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
i^DIVISION (PRELIMINARY)
(#188)
. OF A PLANNING CCliWISSION MEEHNC HELD NOVEMBER 1, 1976 - PA(E 2
table. Several neighbors were interested in knowing how many
lots were less than 5 acres. They felt that this is a 5 acre
zone and should remain as such. However, some of these same
nei^ors own 1, 2 and 3 acre lots themselves. After all the
p«jblic were heard, the public hearing was closed at 8:00 p.m.
iXfter continued discussion, the Planning Commission tabled
this matter to allow the applicant time to submit the follow
ing information:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Review by the Minndiaha Credc Watershed District to
deteimine actual wetlands designation in relation
to areas shown on topog.
Review by agency such as Hennepin County Conservation
Department or Hickok 6 Associates to deteimine flood
plam area and what the restrictions might be.
Review by Hennepin County regarding proposed rerouting
of Coimty Road 6 and vhat effect the proposed sub
division might have on any such future plans.
Hake moved, Guthrie seconded, that the minutes of the
October 18, 1976, meeting be approved as corrected:
Page 8, the following sentence be added to the Hennepin
County yo-Tech item: It should be noted that the Planning
Comnission Members present are opposed to the Vo-Tech
proposal.
Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0).
The Zoning Administrator stated that copies of the final
plat had been sent to each Conmission ^fe^ber. Both parcels
exceed the minimum requirements of 2 acres and 200* lot
wid^s. Hake moved, Hosfield seconded, to recommend approval
m^ect to receipt of the Park Dedication Fee and approval
from the County regarding location of any cuib cuts.
Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0).
Hank Muhich informed the Conmission that this final plat
is the same as the preliminary and meets all the requirements
Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded, to reconmend approval of
the final plat of the lot rearrangement. Motion - Ayes (7),
Nays (0).
Nw applicant was not present to submit necessary informa
tion. Richard Tiegen, a neighboring property owner, was
present and asked if he could address the Conmission. He
wanted to express his concern about the drainage should
the road be raised. The Planning Conmission assured him
that the drainage would be maintained.
STEVE WALLACK (T.M.G.)
(continued)
(#188)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MEETING OCTOBER 18, 1976
FRED LUCAS
2055 SIXTH AVENUE N.
SUBDIVISI(»I (FINAL)
(#95)
DAVID J. KRUSKDPF
1200 WILmURST TRAIL
LOT REARRANGEMENT
(#98)
ROBERT JOHNSON
1121 ELMWOOD AVENUE
VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 WIDTH
(#164)
?-■ -lT n 1
MIM/TES OF A PLANNING GCMUSSION fCETING HELD NOVEMBER 1, 1976 - PAGE 3
The Zcning Administrator presented a copy of thie survey of
tte final plat. The two parcels resulting from the proposed
division contain 8 and 32 acres respectively. Each lot
contains 5 or more acres and subdivision meets Section 39.021.
Exceptions of our code. Pesek moved, Hake seconded, to
recomnend approval of the final plat stbject to the receipt
of the Park Dedication Fee of $500. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0).
HUGH HARRISC^
1305 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
SUBDIVISION (FINAL)
(#172)
Mr, Wolfe was in attendance and presented the survey show
ing the location of the proposed garage. Mr. Wolfe felt
this was the best location for the garage to preserve the
trees, shrubs and bushes on his property. Van Nest moved,
McDonald seconded, to recomnend approval of this variance
based on the hardships as demonstrated as this is a narrow
lot, it is the only practical location to preserve trees,
etc. and existing driveway will act as turn around for
side entry on garage. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0).
Mr. Ldnnan presented certificate of title for Lots 1, 2
and 3 showi^ Mr. Lehman and his brother as joint owners.
A lengthy discussion followed concerning lot area com-
pliai^e. Mr. Lehman felt he was doing everything humanly
possible to meet the code requirements for this subdivision.
Member Van Nest stated that Mr. Lehman had agreed to give
up the conmercial 250* of Lot A provided that he would not
have any problems vdien he planned to subdivide. Van Nest
moved, Oithrie seconded, to recomnend preliminary approval
of the siixlivision of Lots A, B, C and D based on the
hardships demonstrated because of the contour of the land
and narrowness of lots A, B, and C, there is no other land
avail^le within 1 acre district to make standard for Lot
D, and if LR-lCl zoned area were developed under a PRD
proposal the developer would be entitled to four living
units. Approval was conditioned on the following:
(1) A conservation easement over the marsh and wetlands
area be granted to the City.
(2) Water drainage easement be granted to the City along
the drainage ditch.
(3) Subject to a Park Dedication Ftee for 4 lots.
Motion: Ayes - 5 (Van Nest, Hosfield, Guthrie, Hake, Dunlap)
Nays - 1 (Pesdc), Abstain - 1 (McDonald).
G. RAYMOND WOLFE
2925 CASCO K)INT ROAD
VARIANCE - SITE YARD SET
BACK
(#177)
ED LEHNttN
3527 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY)
(#182)
4
MINUIES OF A PLANNING OCTfilSSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 1, 1976 - PAGE 4
Mr. Larson was present. He is requesting approval to build
a new garage with the proposed location to be 6* from the
side lot line and 6* from the street line. A previous
variance request was granted in 1975 to build a house on
this property. Variances were approved subject to several
conditionsy one being that no other variances be necessary.
There was some discussion over the meaning of this stipula
tion. Some members felt this was meant to include the
garage, vhile other members felt this pertained to the
house only. Mr. Larson who purchased the house from Paul
S^rber stated he could not use the present garage in the
winter time. The proposed location extends over a vertical
drop. Mr. Larson's plans are to build up a concrete wall
on a footing from the lower elevation up to the hi^er
grade at road level. Lower level would be used for storage.
After some discussion, Guthrie moved, Pesek seconded, to
recommend approval because of the topography of the land,
it is consistent with the nei^ibors and location would
presem large maple tree on property. Motion - Ayes (5),
Nays (2) - Van Nest and Hosfield.
Mr, Peterson was present. The Zoning Administrator
infoimed the Comidssion that the applicant is requesting
variances for an addition to the rear of the existing
residue and a garage addition to the front. No other
land is available and proposed additions would be a great
improvement to the existing house. Several pictures of
property were presented to the Commission. Chairwoman
IXmlap was conceined about the large tree on the property.
Mr. Peterson assured her that there was approximately 15-20'
between the tree and the addition. Both additions would
continue the existing line of the building. Pesek moved,
Hosfield seconded, to recommend approval of the necessary
variances because house is consistent with neighborhood
and would upgrade to houses already there, lot is narrow,
and no other land is available. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0)
Nfr. Solie was present. Hank Muhich informed the Commission
that the applicant has done some grading and filling on his
property without approval. Mr. Muhich further explained
that this was first brought to the attention of Staff on
August 8, 1976, vhen a conplaint was received concerning
work in progress on this property. Investigation revealed
a major ex^vation done with earth filled near to the shore
and siltation of the water evident. A stop work order was
posted and a tag vjas issued. Mr. Solie was advised to make
a permit application and to seek approval from the other
agencies.
HARVEY LARSON
1342 REST POINT CIRCLE
VARIANCE - GARAGE SIDE
YARD 6 STREET SETBACK
(#187)
BRlTCE PETERSCW
2447 CARMAN STREET
VARIANCE - LOT AREA, l«DTH
SETBACK
(#189)
ROBERT SOLE
1085 NORTH ARM DRIVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
GRADING AND FILLING
(#190)
r
MtNUTCS OF A PLANNING COMMISSICK MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 1, 1976 - PAGE
An application apparently was made to the MOVD because Orono
^ ^ letter from them to Mr. Solie on August
^7, 1976, approving his request. Additional work was apparent
^ done prior to September 9 without the knowledge of staff
The MCWD made an inspection as per their letter to Staff on*
September 29, 1976. A Conditional Use Permit application was
not ria^ until September 20, 1976, after a renewed request
following Staff *s discovery of additional work having been
done, iius application was incomplete and not updated until
October 1, 1976. At this point, the Municipal Court has
ccntpued this case until Council shall take action on this
aiplication. The work done includes cutting down a high bank
and grading the dirt down toward lake level in one comer of
filled up to 5 ft. high and to
wittm 10 ft. of the summer water level. A creosoted tie
retaining iv^l was erected on the lower end and small trees
iiave been planted.
Mr. Solie stated that he has been to court se-.^eral times
concerning this matter. He was not aware that he needed a
conditional use permit from Orono for this work. He felt
^t Ae approval of the MQVD was sufficient. The Zoning
Admmistrator infoimed Nfr. Solie ond the Commission that the
generally enforces regulations. Agencies like
® recommendations and generally do not enforce
o3verai members were concerned and voiced tlieir disapproval
regarding ^ procedures of the MCl'/D and I^ICD when granting
approval of such applications. They requested ^at Council
Tu n? letter to ^ese agencies expressing this concern.
The Planning Commission also wanted to inform these agencies
that Oimo does not approve of the use of creosoted ties in
^y land of lakeshore improvements. The Commission also felt
that wono should contact the Board of Governors for these
agenues and discuss their policy for granting approval of
applicatiOTs, such as Mr. Solie *s, before approval has been
given by the Council.
Mr. Tiegen, a neighbor to the south, stated that it is quite
maintain the bank in this area, and can symphathize with Mr. Solie.
Hal^ moved, Pesek seconded, to table this matter so that the
members who had not already done so could visit this site
Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0).
The Placing Commission also felt that some consideration
snould ce given to rewriting the ordinance concerning lake-
shore regulations. ^
ROBERT SOLIE
(continued)
(#190)
1 f-,
MDUreS OF A PLANNING CaWISSICN MEETING HELD NOVBffiER 1, 1976 - PAGE 6
Member Van Nest reported that one other chart had been added to
the plan. Few modifications have been made. Ihe Con?)rehensive
Sewer Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Waste Control
and a meeting is scheduled with them for later this week. The
Public Hearing on this matter will be held on November 10, 1976,
at the Freshwater Biological Institute.
The Zoning Administrator explained that a Public Hearing has
been scheduled for November 15, 1976, at 7:45 p.m. concerning
the rezoning in Navarre resulting from the settlement of the
law suit. Final action is to be completed by November 29,
1976. Member Van Nest pointed out the additional area in
Navarre to be considered for rezoning also. The Planning
Comnission is requesting that Council study this additional
property to be rezoned for their input as to what is reason
able to rezone. The Planning Commission is in favor of this
rezoning.
The Planning Commission went into work sessions on David
Butler, Warren Ortenblad, Edwin Kuglin and Curt Jenson.
The Planning Commission received a copy of the letter Mrs.
Watson sent to Dick Benson requesting that she be considered
for an opening on the Planning Commission. Chairwoman Dunlap
infoimed the Commission that she knew this woman personally
and felt she was a conscientious person.
Van Nest moved. Hake seconded, that the meeting be adjourned
at 10:40 p.m.
CCMPREIENSIVE SEWER PLAN
NAVARRE AREA REZCNING
APPLICATION OF MRS.
JOHN (PEGGY) iraSCN
ADJ0URN4ENT
V
t-¥a ir'irii
i
s
- wi
/
it
o
TO:
FRilM:
DATr.:
SUlUIiCT:
IHck licnson. City Ailministrntor
Hank Zoning Administrator
August 12, 197n
#164
Robert Jolmson - 1121 l-lnwood Avenue
Variance - Lot Area IVidth
Lot
Ix)t Area Width
Required 43,.S60 140'
Subject Lot 25,9on 100’
Variance Request 17,660 40’
Lots ‘\ and 5 arc listed under .John Keller on our Tiroperty ouners list, so
Mr. Jolmson is probably purchasing tins property tlirough a contnict for deed.
Lots 0, 7, 8 and 0 arc eacli individually o\^ed. If jx)ssil)le, I think w should
try to resolve this problem noiv so wc c.an eliminate any future requests for
variances on exceptionally small lots.
At present, tlie owner of lots 20, 21, 22 and 23 also owns lot 6 for lake access;
the oivner of lot 19 owns lot 8; and the o\mer of lot 18 owns lot 9. Lot 7 is
individually owned.
The huge trees on the sul)joct lots should be preserved if |•)Ossiblc.
PLANNING COFWISSION MEETING - September 7, 1976
Tabled for more data:
(1)
•K t
(2)
(3)
Current survey including survey stakes and flags on site to verify actual
lot comers in relation to neighboring structures and sewer manholes.
Location of new residence.
Contour map (topog) to alleviate possible future problems with runoff
drainage, access and sewer line cover.
STAFF - September 16, 1976
No additional data has been submitted as of this date.
PLANNING CCMUSSION MEim!4G - September 20, 1576
Applicant still hadn't submitted necessary data.
PLAirnh'G axrilSSION ’OrriNG - October 4, 1976
Mo new m.aterial sul^mitted.
PIA'T>T.MG OOftllSSIQN MEITriNG - October 18, 1976
Tabled for new information.
PiA'z.Tjn oryf'issiai 'inirriM’G - Movc'^’hor i, 1976
Mo representative present. Meighlior, '!r. Tieg.cn, sliowed concern about drainage if
road is raised - culvert would bo reauirod. Tabled for lack of necessarv material.
i
i
*i
n
f
f i
» '*'•1
I
Stcvf ■•.allaok fo/^ntion)
Sixtli Awiuio 'i.
if jiiilHUvision
Page 2 f r » 7 f.4’
PLWINC C0r?’ISSI«K - October 4, 1076 it
A Public '.Icnring was schcdiilcil for .\ovcnber 1, 1976 at 7:30 n.n.
PLAYJT'JO CO'l^'TSSION ».tIT:TTN ’C - k^ovenber 1, 1976
Oiitc a few ailjoining neighbors apnenred for the T^iblic {’earing. Several stated their
p[)sition on the proposal ~ sot^o objected . Hie Planning ConFiission ta/jled this natter
and requested tlie follo'N'ing adt^itional infomation:
1.
2.
3.
Re\riew l)v v’atershed nistrict or lleancpin County Conservation district to detemine
actual wetlands designation in relation to tiiose s{iot\m on developer s tooog.
Pevie'.' by appropriate agenc''^ as to flood plain st.atus of subject pronerty anc. \%.iat
effect it night have on proposed su;>division.
Peview bv liennepin County Public V.brbs Pcpartiicnt with regard to proposed rerouting
of ^oiintv ro«iLh>ravs and cffoct su!>division nifiht have on any sucli fiicurc pltips.
STAFF - N’ovenbor 2, 1976
I contacted .Icnnepin County l\iblic ’’or’KS ’Vpartnent regarding roaih.*ays and sent then n
copy of tlie plans.
I talked to IjVlc !^v;anson, called Ilickock f .Associates and .iennopin County Conservation
District licforc learning Conscrx ’ation District would review* \;ctlands status. .^*nt copy
of plans.
Called munerous agencies before Icaminn designated f]oo(| plain areas have no legal
bearing on properties because of conflicting opinions. Jew flood plain nans are nw
being drawn In* '.arr ’ngincering. Valked to I,eii wraner a!)out nro{)lcn - nssurcil no ne
would revieiv' and send ne a report.
Ia
't
t i.
f
I
I
*1
TIMlIlll MlftfUnlir
■
“Tv
-J-
O
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
CONSULTING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS
DOUGI.AS VB •AMW
JOHN O DICMSOM
I. ft MOI.SAtHCN
ALLAN GLIlHAItO
^NCC AVI
»OLIS. Mil
^ E i-v. j 'i 111
nj
:>
)
VILLAGE Of. ORONQ
■: '■
'Wi> I
November 4, 1976
• - J . V
!
Mr. Henry Muhich
Orono City Hall
Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Dear Mr. Muhich:
Enclosed is a copy of the October 17, 1975 Flood Hazard Boundary Map
for the City of Orono and a pamphlet discussing the Flood Insurance Program
If you have additional questions, please contact me.
LK/llc
enc.
JH
I
‘i
* J
• i
i
tsaaaaiaaaaaMB
n.‘
f
11
9
t !
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WASHINGTON O.C. 30410
HDD-No. 75-67
Phone (202j 755-5581
k.
202) 755-528U
Hr. Farley)March 10, 1975
TIONS AND ANSWERS
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
1. Q. What is the National Flood Insurance Program and what is
it designed to do?
A.®ie program established by Congress in the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968 and expanded in the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 is designed to provide flood
insurance at rates made affordable throufi^ a Federal subsidy.
In return, communities must adopt and administer local
measures that protect lives and new construction from fhture
flooding.
2. Q. Is the program designed for individuals or communities?
A.Both. While Individuals in a participating community may
obtain financial protection against flood losses, the
community itself enhances the overall value of its flood
plains and assures the increased safety of its citizens.
3. Q. Who may apply for participation in the program?
A.Any community with the authority to adopt and administer flood
plain management regulations for the flood-prOne areas within
their jurisdiction.
Q. What communities should apply for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program?
A.All communities that have flood problems, especially those
communities that have already been issued maps from the
Federal Insurance Administration (PIA) identifying their
areas of special flood hazard.
i
i
i
I
I-
i
I
\
t
)
t
5* Q.
6.
7.
9.
A.
Q.
A.
Q.
A.
8. Q.
A.
Q.
A.
- 2 -
Hov does a coi
program?
(unity qualify for the flood insurance
By submitting a ccmiplete application to FIA.
Hov do people find out %#hen their community has qualified
for Hi* r^rogvam?
Officials of the community are advised by letter of the date
that the sale of flood insurance will begin. Rress releases
announcing the ccmmiunity's eligibility are also sent to
the community for use by local newspapers and radio and
television stations. The National Flood Insurers Association
(NFIA) or its servicing company for that area also sends
out notices to inform insurance agents and brokers of
the availability of coverage. Notice is also inibliahed in
the Federal Register.
Vhat is the National Flood Insurers Association?
The NFIA is an association of private insurance cooq>anies
formed specifically to provide flood insurance under the
cooperative Govemment<>private industry program. Membership
is open to .all qualified companies licensed to write property
insurance under the laws of any State. Member insurance
conq)anie8 have subscribed more than H4I1 million in risk
capital, nie NFIA appoints a servicing coinpanyy generally
on a statewide basis y to disseminate information both to the
public and to insurance agents y to process all insurance
policies y and to handle the ^justment of claims for loss
payments.
Is assistance available to a community in qualifying for
flood insurance?
Yes. A community may contact the appropriate State Coord
inating Agency, the Flood Insurance Specialist in the HDD
region in \diich the community is located, or FIA in Washington,
B. C. for program information, application forms, sample
ordinances, etc. (See the lists at the end of this brochure
for the appropriate agencies you may contact.)
What is a State Coordinating Agency?
The Governor of each State has designated an agency of
State government to coordinate the activities of the flood
insurance program in that State and assist communities in
adopting the required flood plain management regulations and
qualifying for the program.
1:
•4
I ^
i m
i
- more -
II r IIII ii I 1 I Cl Tt Ie I a ii.r navim ■ i~>* ■ m ~iimi 1' ei ~
L
v:
0
rf » •
12.
A.
A.
Q.
A.
13. Q.
A.
- 3 -
10. Q. By what means is a community notified of its identification
as having one or more areas of special flood hazard?
An "identified” flood-prone community is one for .which
PIA has published a map called a "Flood Hazard Boundary
Map" vdiich delineates the areas subject to severe flooding
within the community. This map is usually the first map
PIA sends to a flood-prone community. Together with this
map, PIA sends a letter of transmittal explaining the
map, application forms, and program information to community
officials.
11. Q. What is a special flood hazard area?
It is that area subject to inundation by the base flood
i.e., a flood that has a one-percent chance of occurrence
in any given year. This standard is used by virtually
every Pederal agency in the administration of its programs
as they relate to the flood plains. In addition, the same
standard is required either by law or regulation in many
States and is used in the administration of State programs
in virtually every State.
Can a community challenge PIA's Flood Hazard Boundary Map?
Yes. If, after receiving a Flood Hazard Boundary Map,
the community feels that it is not flood-prone or has
corrected the flood hazard, it has six months from the
date of the nap to challenge PIA*s designation.
A community may agree with PIA's determination that there
are local flood problems, but dispute the extent of the
hazard areas as shown on PIA's map. In this case, the
community may at any time submit data for review. FIA
will review the data and, if warranted, amend the
community's map.
Is there a specified time by which communities should
qualify for the program?
Yes. July 1, 19751 or within one year of notification,
whichever is later.
If an identified community hsis not qualified for the program
by the prescribed date, no Pederal or federally-related
financial assistance may legally be provided for the
construction or acquisition of buildings in the community's
identified special flood hazard areas. Such assistance
will remain unavailable until the community has qualified.
The financing of buildings outside these areas however
is not affected.
- more -
•1
#:
!
•lw< * «»•#•%» - ••• ^
16.
17.
18.
- u -
lU. Q. What is meant by "Federal or federally-related financial
assistance"?
A.The term includes direct Federal financial assistance such
as grants, SBA and TaSA loans, VA and fSA mortgage loans,
and conventional construction and mortgage loans from
federally Insured, regulated or supervised lending
institutions, e.g., banks insured by FDIC, savings and loan
institutions insured by FSLIC or regulated by the Federal
Home Loan Baxik Board, credit unions insured by the National
Credit Union Administration, banks regulated by the
, Comptroller of the Currency or the Federal Reserve Board.
1^. Q. When is flood insurance required by law?
A.
Q.
A.
Q.
A.
Q.
A.
flood insurance must be purchased as a condition of
obtaining Federal financial assistance for the construction
or acquisition of buildings in the identified special flood
hazard areas of communities where flood insurance is
available.
Who determines whether properties require flood insurance?
When the financial assistance is directly from a Federal
agency, the agency Itself must make the determination. In
the case of lending institutions covered by the Act, the
lender or his authorized representative must make the
determination. This responsibility cannot be discharged
by obtaining a self-certification from the borrower.
How much flood insurance is required by law?
Usually, up to the amount of the financial assistaxice or
the max inn UP amount of insxirance available under the
program, whichever is less.
What insurance benefits are available under the program?
When a community initially qualifies for the sale of flood
insurance under the Bnergency Program, limited amounts of
coverage are available at subsidized rates for virtually
every building as well as the contents regardless of the
risk. After FIA*s detailed Flood Insurance Rate Map has
been prepared, and the community enters the Regular
Program, the available limits of coverage are double those
available under the Emergency Program. Hie second layer .
of coverage at actuarial (non-subsidized) rates is
available together with the subsidized first layer of
- more -
- s -
covera^ for all existing structures regardless of location.
Both layers of coverage under the Regular Program for new
structures in the identified special flood hazard areas
are made available at actuarial rates reflecting the degree
of flood risk for each property. Actuarial premium rates
for new construction built at required elevations are
comparable to or« in some casest lower than the subsidized
rates. However»the rates for new structures built i]iq>roperly,
in the special flood’ hazard areas will be very hifgti reflecting
the appropriate degree of flood risk.
The following chart sets forth the available limits of
coverage as well as appropriate premium rates under the programs
(2)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Regular Program _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Single Family Residential
Other Residential
Non-Residentlal
Contents* Residential
(per unit)
Contents* Non-Residentlal
(per unit)
Qnergency Pronaa
First Layer
(1)
Second Layer
Limit
I 35.000
100*000
100*000
10,000
100,000
Subsidized
Rates
(Per 1100)
25^
25^
lsO0
35^
75^
Limit
•III#
I 35,000
100,
100,
10,000
100,
•III#
•!•!•
Actuarial
Rates
Varies
I'otal
Limits of
Coverage
I 70,000
200,000
200,000
20,000
200,000
Notes:
(1)
(2)
Only the first layer of coverage is available under the Ehiergency Program.
a.
b.
d.
e.
Full coverage is available under the Regular Program for all structures in the
comminlty.
New construction and substantial improvements in the flood hazard areas oust
pay actuarial rates for all coverage.
All existing structtires must pay actuarial rates for the second layer of
coverage and have the option of paying either the subsidized or actuarial
rate for the first layer, whichever is lower.
New construction outside the flood hazard area is treated the same as
Sie^maxLBum actuarial rate for 1-1: family residential structures is $0^ per $100
of coverage under certain conditions.
- more -
0
I
.1
^11^1
•f
1
' *
■i'-
• » %_
i'
' *
>. ■
9^4
r
•w
■.
- ^ -
19* Q« Vho may purchaso a riood Inauranoe policy?
A.Any property owner whoae building is located in a conanunity
that has been ^proved for the sale of flood insurance
under the progran. The owi'^rs or tenants of such structures
may also purchase contents coverage.
20. Q. How does one obtain a flood insurance policy?
A.AftsT a conanunity Qualifies for the sale of flood insurance•
flood insurance policies may be purchased from any
property and casualty insurance agent or broker licensed
to do business %rithin the State.
21, Q. Is there a minimum premiiam for flood insurance policies?
A. Yes. $25
22. Q. Do flood insurance policies contain a deductible clause
and if so how much is it?
A.Yes. $200 or of the loss, idiichever is greater. Ihe'
deductible is applicable independently to structure and
contents coverage.
23. Q.Does insurance under the program provide coverage at Ihll
replacement cost?
A.YeSf but replacement cost is only available for single
family dwellings %diich are insured for 0096 of the structure's
replacement cost at the time of loss or the maximum amount
of insurance available under the program • >diiohever is
less. In all other cases, adjustment of losses will be
based on the actual cash value of the insurable item at the
time of loss.
2l|. Q. Vhat structures are eligible for flood insurance coverage?
A.Virtually every type of walled and roofed building,
other than a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally
above ground and affixed to a permanent site.
25. Q. What types of losses are covered?
A.Direct flood and flood-related losses, including mudslide,
i.e., mudflov^ and flood-related erosion losses, are
covered. This would include losses from river and stream
flooding, coastal flooding, flooding along the shores
of lakes and flood-related erosion in such areas as a
result of storm activity.
- more -
• •
4
' f
aw I irm
m
f!
i'f
Ky
?!
i
'■m
%
i
.20.
29.
•7I -
26, Q. What is a mudslide?
A. It is a condition where there is actually a river of
liquid mud flowing-down a hillside usually the result of
both unusually heavy rains and loss of brush cover.
27. Q. Are sewer back-ups covered?
A, Yes, but a general condition of flooding must exist and
the sewer back-up must be clearly a result of that
condition.
Q.
A.
A.
Q.
A.
Can condominium units be insured separately?
Yes. When the condominium unit is a traditional townhouee
or rowhouse, it is considered for insurance purposes as
a single-family dwelling and may be insured separately.
For other types of residential condominiums, the buildings
are considered multi-faxnily dwellings and insurance must
be taken out in the name of the condominivims owners'
association, l^e coverage may be taken out in an amount
equal to the maximum amount available on the building
or in an amount to cover the value of each unit until the
m^yimum amount of insurance available on the building has
been purchased.
What kinds of property are not ins\irable under the program?
Wharves, piers, bulkheads, growing crops, land, shrubbery,
livestock, roads, bridges, motor vehicles, etc.
What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map?
A Flood Insurance Rate Map is usually the second map FIA
furnishes to a community. This map is the result of a
detailed engineering study and is used in conjunction with
a community's participation in the Regular Program.
This study and map further refine the boundary lines of
a community's special flood hazard areas to reflect the
flood elevations in such areas that would occur during
a flood with a one-percent chance of occurrence in any
given year. The actuarial or non-subsidized premium rates
reflecting the degree of flood risk to which properties are
exposed in flood-prone areas are determined from this data.
- more -
1
K
:!
■!
* £
I I
y .
PVUlTT/r T-
i- •
V
[% J
- > ‘
U •'■ 'i
•*. ;•
33.
.. •
r\n
- 8 -
•f .
i
' i%-
U-^y- • . . • ■
i r
. •••
4 #
*. •? ' '
31. Q. It there an on>ortunity for oocaunity input in the Hood
Inturance Study?
A.Tea. Before the study is Inltlatedt an FIA representative
consults with local officials in order to obtain all
existing infomation for tise by the contractor. A publio
neetin^ %fill be oonduoted at which interested parties
■ay present any relevant facts or technical data for
oonsideration during the study. Such local input is a
vital part of the study to assure accurate results.
32. Q. Is there a oeans of appealing the flood elevations?
A.Tes. Before they becoae final for a coonunlty, notice
of then is published twice in a proninent local news-
l^aper and citizens have 90 days after the second publication
to appeal these elevations by subnitting any appropriate
technical data through their local officials.
Q., Vhat steps oust a c<
available locally?
■unity take to make flood insurance
A. The ooDBunity naist coonit itself to flood plain Banageaent
that protects new construction froa future flooding.
3U* Q. Vhat is meant by flood plain Banageaent?
A.Hood plain nanageoent neana the operation of on overall
program of corrective and psreventive measures for reducing
flood danage including but not limited to emergency
preparedness plans and any regulations aimed at the fbture
use of the flood plain. Such regulations.refer to specific
local codes and ordinances which provide standards for
the location and design of new development within fl<^-
prone SMas. These regulations may be adopted, in eny
manner that is legally enforceable for a partlouler
community, and typically take the form of portions of zoning,
subdivision or building regulations, or a speoial purpose
ordinance such as a flood plain ordinance. As a condition
of participation in the National Flood Insurance Program,
8 community must adopt flood plain management regulations
meeting mint mum standards published by FIA.
Vf .r
.1*
I
I
^ • .*
lb f
t.
t
t
•I
*(
’ I 1
i'V*'Jtl
M
■
35. Q.Vhat are the minimum flood plain management standards
necessary for a oonnunlty to qualify for the BMrgency
Program?t k
A.A comonmity musti l) require building permits for all
new construction and substantial improvements and 2) review
the permit to assure that sites are reasonably tv from
flooding. For its flood-prone areas, the community must
also require: l) proper anchoring of structures, 2) the
use of construction materials and oMthods that will
minimize f?ood damage, 3) adequate drainage for new sub-
- acre -
• «. V.* ••»e wM. 1^ . * *.*%*•« 'V*. »• MM.. • • #.♦ «\
/tarn..__*____it nVtin -t. V-_______________ , ....
I IK.
I
36.
38.
r^a
- 9 -
divialonSf and U) that new or replaceioent utility
systems be located and designed to preclude flood loss.
Q.
A.
Vhat kinds of additional regulations will be required?
When a community enters the Regular Program, the community
must require that all new construction in identified areas
of special flood hazard be elevated or floodproofed to
the level of the base flood. Additional standards are
required within any designated floodway or coastal hi£^
hazard area.
37. Q. *Who establishes and who administers the program’s flood
plain management regulations?
A.
A.
lA. Q.
FIA has established the minimum standards required for
participation in the program, but it is the responsibility
of local communities to adopt and administer these
standards.
Q. Do the required flood plain management regulations apply
retroactively to existing structures in the flood plains?
A. No.
39. Q. Will the program's flood plain management regulations ever
affect existing structures in the Identified flood hazard
areas?
A. Onl?' when a structure is substantially ijuproved.
1^0. Q. Vhat is a substantial inqprovement?
It is any ixQ>rovement or repair of a structure, the cost
of which equ<»*'.s or exceeds SO percent of the market value
of the struc'' xe before the improvement is started or the
damage has occurred.
Do the program's flood plain management regulations apply
to new construction outside of the identified areas of
special flood hazard?
A. No.
1^2. Q. Can a community be selective in the administration of its
' flood plain management regulations?
- more -
II
•:
\l
I
I'j
i.
M
* •
J.i.s
t:
I •«» «
r
r
0%
37.
3B.
la.
o
- 9 -
divii»ionat and U) that new or replacement utility
systems be located and designed to preclude flood loss.
36. Q. What kinds of additional regulations will be required?
A.When a community enters the Regular Program, the community
must require that all new construction in identified areas
of special flood hazard be elevated or floodproofed to
the level of the base flood. Additional standards are
required within axiy designated floodway or coastal hi£^
hazard area.
Q. *Who establishes and who administers the program's flood
plain management regulations?
A.
FIA has established the minimum standards required for
participation in the program, but it is the responsibility
of local communities to adopt and administer these
standards.
Q. Do the required flood pladn management regulations apply
retroactively to existing struct\u:es in the flood plains?
A. No.
39. Q. Will the program's flood plain management regulations ever
affect Sexisting structures in the identified flood hazard
areas?
A. Only vdien a structure is substantially Improved.
k0» Q. What is a substantial improvement?
It is any inqprovement or repair of a structure, the cost
of which equals or exceeds $0 percent of the market value
of the structure before the improvement is started or the
damage has occurred.
Q. Do the program's flood plain management regulations apply
to new construction outside of the identified areas of
special flood hazard?
A. No.
U2. Q. Can a community be selective in the administration of its
' flood plain management regulations?
- more -
. j:
■»<»»■*> »*<**»J> ^ ^ *.1. • in** an*
«»iP X!vv
• • •. • • • A
|^X>
• # • • •
f.*..I.*.*.*,l.*.*.v.
iiiii:.
TURNH.
'/
• • ••«••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • V
I
r ^
.y
'*Xl*XvX*X'X*X*X'X*X*X*XvXyX^r*X*X*X*\vX*X* WxXxXxX^vX^v^.r^.l.v^X^
•XvXxXxXxw^^^^^
••:v:x:;:::x:::xXxW^^^^^• vXvXvXW^^^^• • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • •
• • • • •
I
•••••••<
iHlii:••••••••«
•••••••••I
••••••
•••••••••<••••••••»••••••••••
!•••«••••••••
«#••••••«
...................
f • • • • •
#• •••••••♦••• • • • • •#•••••••••••• • • • • • •# ••••••••••• • • • • •^•••••••••••« •••••«^« ••••••••••• •^r • • • • • •• ••«••••••• •••••«• ••••••••••* ••••••• ••••••••«• ••••••««•••••••••• ••••••• •••••••••• ••••••«• •••••••••• «••••••• ••••••••• •_& *••••••• •••••••••• •••••••• ••••••••• • ••••••••• ••••••••• •_m* *••••♦•• ••••••••• w* • ••••••»• ••••••••• •m ••••••••
• •••••••• • ••••••«••• • • • • • • •
»•••••••»••••••••
••••••••••I
> ■•' .1
•»•••••••• ••••••••• •••••••• ••••••«••
• •••••• •••••. ••••• • • • • w* ••••••••••- • • «V #••••••••
ORCHARD PARK
I • • • • W* ••••••••••• • • • •m #•••••••• • A
•*»*«***^« •••••#••• *V
• • • ••••••••• •H• • • • V* ••• *• • • •••• •••••• • • • M ••••*•••••••• • • • •••••••••••• • • •V •••••••••••<
x:JPx-x-:-:v‘ •■•: •*:::tF:Xx:;::X^
r« ••••••#•
.xw:i>P^ ......
• ••••••.•;v:<<-X;iir-x-:-:-:-:xv:-‘ -»J2 .
• • • • • • ■.;.^.^.,.;.;!yjv!\;XjjvIvXvX ^ • •*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*• *«*****»^^?^«*»* •*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•mmmmmmm
BAY RD.• • • •
,^;Xx;;::Xv:v::X;;::::v::::v./;.:
■•:xXxXxXx::::>:xXxX:/:x x::::;:;::::::;::;::::;::X;::::m x::;:;:::::::::;:;::::;x:;:::#x::::::::: •xxxxxxyxx-vxxxx
». --w’
Xvxx-:-x':
,:iilili
tes.;.
liiliPy
.V
•li
.:x$*
**X*>*!
*.'•.**.***.x
!X*:
x*.
!tMm
•m a *•
!f
I
r..
A .<
?
t.Vi
• W
•'51
i)
I .1
>
•;i
5
r-
i.»i?
{
n
! C.#
<•
I. ♦
V
r^.
Dick lienson. City Aibninistrator
mf^!:
DATE:
if •«A. P. Olson, Vsst. Zoning Administrator rr ft*
October 13, 1976
i y
SUIUECT: Rolx?rt Solie - 1035 North Arm Drive
Conditional Use Permit - Crading and Tilling
This application is persuant to Section 31.700 and 31.705 requiring a Conditional
Use Permit for grading and filling of any land, esix^cially lakeshore property,
within Orono. In this case, the work in question has been done, and staff has
instructed Mr. Solie to seek Council approval.
Oi August 8, 1976, staff received a complaint of work in progress on this property.
Investig,ation rwealed a major excavation done with earth filled near to the shore
and siltation of the water evident. A stop work order was posted and a tag was
issued. Mr. Solie was advised to make a permit application and to also seek
approval from the other agencies.
An application apparently was made to the MCiVD because we liave a copy of a letter
from tliem to Mr. Solie on August 27, 1976, approving his request. Additional work
was then apparently done prior to September 9, 1976 (without Orono Staff knowledge)
with an MOVD inspection as per their letter to me on .September 29, 1976.. 'fhe
Conditional Use Permit application was not made initil September 20, 1976 (initially
incomplete; not updated until October 1, 1976) after a renewed request following
staff's discovery of additional work having been done. At this point, the
Municipal Court has continued this case until the Council shall take action on
this application.
The work done inclutles cutting down a high bank and grading the dirt down toward
lake level in one comer of the lot. TIic loiver level was filled up to 5 ft. high
and to within 10 ft. of the suimer water level. A creosoted tic retaining wall
was erected on the lower end and apnraximately 2 dozen small trees have been
planted, 'fhe slope has been seeded, hliile the drawing submitted is not technical,
the nature of tlie work can easilv be seen on site.
nA'.MNC Cl'MSSI''''! - 'lovombcr 1, 1976
T!ie Zoning Ailninistrator explained the current status of th.c nrojoct in relation to
t!ic proi'josal as subritted. On ^u^ust 3, 1976, the la!:es!iore grading project '/ns
reported. After investigating a "Stop h’orV" nr’er was nosted notifv'ing t;ie o’\nor
that he ’>;as in violation of our zoning ordinance. T!\c ouncr net with us tlie
followin'^ dav at whic!i time we exr>lained hot^ ho v/as in violation and suggested he • #make an application for annroval to connlcte the project, ’’c also remindo*! him
of the reemirenent for t'lC approval of other agencies, '^r. I^lie never returned
with the anniication until n^ter a letter was sent to him reminding hir of his
failure to sulinit tlie necessar>' application. .\not!ier on-site inspection v/as riade
at which time' it '/as discovered that the owner Imd cornlcte<l tlie grading and most
of tlie sodding, lie ha«l also a<k!cd a retaining wall of creosote ties at a distance
of t?' to 9' fron the ^<ater's edge. At present the distance from the slioreline is
somewhat greater as tiie lake elevation has been droiming continuously l.ccause of
the lad of stem water nmoff this past season.
•t
4
t i
*
'
■ • f llMaTl f 11
i
f t<•;
i
• i
4
1
>!i
r.ol't'i't M>1 ii' - I \r.i !>rivo
' (T'.'intUt iou;il I'S;' •Vp"it 'lr:!*’ifVT ntv.l l-illin>7.
i^,c :
va
/ ■'• •o
>
'Hie riannino CcH’Fiission 'vns sor:'ow'*iat concomovl nhout the omt-Umi, hnt verv concemc-l
about tliO creosote ties that vere nlacoi ’ so close to t!;e lake.
Some of tiic Planinne Con ’’ission ncH)crs liail not haU the onnortunltv to investigate
the nroblcn so the pronosal vas tabled to rive all rienl^ers a chance to nake an on
site insTX*ction.
'fr,;
■k>-
: '0^
fm
%m-
Mr'
f
iti
6
TO:Pick Henson, Citv Administrntor
FROM:Hank ’^fiihich, Zonin.n Administrator # 19b
HATi::Novori^cr 10, 1070
J5UB.ir:CT: Can’’ F. ^tonda]e - 106S Coimt-n^ Club Road* #
Variance - Lot Area fi Width for Addition to Ihcistino vStructurc
The fVjndale’s are requestini’ approval to add a 24' x 30' attached parage to their
existing dwelling, fliey currently liave a tuck-under garage. Since T first saw
this, I have not been able to contact the Mondale's as to \diat their plans night
be concerning the existing tuck-undcr garage. If their plans include renovating
the existing parage area as additional living quarters or recreation room, 1 see
no bip problem here.
All setback requirements v;ill be met, and there is no additional land available
to increase cither tlie lot width or area.
!'■•«
■I
*■■1
\ ..
#)
i
'i
H
■ i
.ii.
*■
r'V
t
/ .«
! ;
/■ cm OF ORCNO, MINNESOTA
Conditional Use and Variance Application
LOCATION OF PRC»>0SAL (or property)
Address 1965 Country Club Road
/^V
%s
1- i
Legal Description Lot 2, Block 3 Long Lake Country
^ UlUb addlxion
APPLICANT
Name Gary F. Mondale Phone # ^75“1893
Address 1965 Country Club Road, Long Lake 55356
OWNER
Name Gary F» Mondale Phone #^75-1893
Addiess same as above
Present Zoning I /A Present Use /tX
TYPE OF REQUEST
Conditional Use
1
X Variance
Wetlands Variance
_Riprap
5^'-'Fee //''/ "/ M
i,/
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Date
/proved
DeniedZoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3^.
Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4/ o!<:tcrek c^//y^c/ c S/f/r
I Explain Request Relative to Requirements
s#
7 r / *
Extent of Non-confoimity ^
j Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Pennit)
MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
;’yj
' (C
aX ■/'
1. Application conpleted
2. Plat Map Section
Survey TSketch iiSurvey (Sketch in proposal)
4, Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (ttMfeST (ISO ft.) -
from Hennepin County Registrar of
Deeds
5. $30.00 Fee
Date
7
7 /.■ ./ K Signatul«
V
...4 r-
iJL r.ft •
. 1’'*'_ , *! ,
iv^ V ' t:
• ■ ♦
i • iv
4
‘J*;-
,rv
« i
>
.4‘ * 1.-r ru
».*
;4'- *’
‘.yt'w-;....
:.J ■'■&>:.
•! ..»
•
r, u'
■ " Jt
•;-t.
:l:Vv
i' •*
-f \t
’ /! '
Pr.
ii
A
*r
)
#1Pint of f^iurvey
for ('Ary F. Honda
of Tx5t 2, Plock 3. Lonn Lnk^ Country Club Addition
Hennepin f-ounty, Mlnnerota
CoONTtlY dcc/a
^o,
N i7*34 50'V 150.T
9
t
M
81
loao • •«••• •• •••••(
Z Eiusfin^ K«UftC
---------------------------------------------------------->: :M' f
I
I
... #lir't
I
I
»
w eT'j^'so'W f«ro ‘
Certiflrat^ of Stirvey;
T hereby rorlify that thle is a true «nd rorr^^'t
rerroaentntlon of «i survey of th** bcundarlee of l/>t 2, ^loek /,
Lorr I^Ve Country Club Aodltton, uirs ih«* lo-atlon of aU oxlsMriK
bui Vd^n^TF thereo’’. It dorr: r.ct mircx^rt to fV.ov oth«»r 1 ffprrv*’'nv^nt s
or onorcafhmentF .
Scale: ,1" = 5C*
Dn tfj : 11-1—76
o : Iron marker
Gorden rl. Cofflr. Hck . J^.
Lend Fur'eyor and !*lannor
Lonr, Mlnnenota
>'
Ht'S^ t DEPARTMENT OF FINANou
A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55487
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
#1 • >. V
ADDRESS
1 nwyl-aKp.r.r
JXOrsO
DESCRIPTION
Lavo^n
|C>FHo<r^W
|V) r. HarL\ naK
I'T'v \ d ITe«ocgQohnU.o o lataan
■«>
(Vlat qaH7
F^O CTc o iitrnC-l>jV )
1^40 Cc<3f^LrvyCio^V^\
UG oca
L-onc?
Uo o U2 V-2L^e
L-O iO<c^
\^U:>'zXloonC IoV.)Rc
2 .
K.‘O V> icV
^ I ^
r\4 P)l )r\|PM No Q,^(o
UoAC^ to^£:,SiS£jlo
(TA\I/OrO O iSl
IradL^O
>1 ^ -
............... CPl^t HI ^7^
M , \ \ V iCKpO Wpiorn^ VJ<^t ^onq
1-
LOT BLK.PARCEL
^ -. .. ...
!
■::0 cA nioo'
(d <3 3c? oc
1 56od
0?3 (d OOC
3 (m4oc
.— ... -. —
•
ic^oa
. • . • - - " ■ -
boca_
"i
----------------—......
•
c?6/ 0
> \
rn-m • •■ - - . • . • •■
p . .-
it
*« *
..1
j
i.
ii'
- ■
. i
i
- ...•. .. - ^
......... . _.. J
!■
J
... <
i
a
'IM:
rnoM;
'Uck Ik'nson, ('itv .Vljninistrntor
iliuik f*ui\ic!i, "oninr Ailninistrator
• • *• 7A M
'« f
■[
!
>
I
kt •u y
• 1
M i?-JBL.^jJhi
CITY OF ORCNO, MINNESOTA
ditional Use and Variance ^iplication
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
y7
TYPE OF REQUEST
/O3o l/^f\k.'ati:a
Legal Description
APPLICANT
Name Airs T?/>;bc-rl- l4 Phone # V7/-f/7P
Address Jc3c i^fitatLrA"~^r\nri Lonrj Lnkr fhn Ss'Ji/, 6-
ONNER
Name )Phone #
Address
Present Zoning /jf .. //^_ _ _ _Present Use
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
Specify Ordinance Requirements_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Conditional Use
y Variance
Wetlands Variance
Riprap
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Date
Approved
Denied
Arj fj'/riir4Li fA> i Li-r A Lf_>ifiun peckj Im/^.
Explain Request Relative to Requirements
fVncci r«ppi t x mvtipK^ 4‘ee>l i/snr^/:4nrl 11
he>/:|hh on uNnt I pt). b-.)
Extent of Non-confonnity _ A j| Wf ^ n^.>r{
riOr 4v<r~ ______________
Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Pemit^
1•-------if'C reiA'^.nablt^ fCiurAc^j Coui mmrt \
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _( Scfc? hf=Y i HfJr ^_ _ _ _ _
MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
1. Application conpleted
2. Plat Map Section
T. Survey (Sketch in proposal)
4.
5.
Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (300 ft.) (150 ft.)
from Hennepin County Registrar of
Deeds
$30.00 Fee
J r3c)^ 7/^Signature V;7v, A/
ft
«
,
i‘ o
mm
M
•* J
"1 T-
•t-^
^ i •<O
•J.V 1' . •.'1
- t'»■•
« 4
V*
^ X
•««*•
«• .2.• #•#
.1 •^!
» *s k-
‘.V
> •.
• ^
r ^
%*
■ - J. -'•1
To the Orono Planning Coamis-lon:
■44^* ^
October 30f 1976
The reason our family is seeking this variance, is to give us
some privacy and peace of mind which we feel we are entitled to
living in the Village of Orono.
Our home became ours this October after living here for twenty
years and finally making that last mortgage payment. We treasure the
beautiful lake in front of our home and the privacy we have had these
many years. Needless to say, we were very distressed when Mrs. Parten
chose to build her deck 10 feet from our property line, half story
above the ground level, looking down directly onto our patio and into
the lake front windows of our family room, when her property has a
depth of over 600 feet.
We thought the village had a policy of not allowing a new house
on the lakeshore to be built in front of an existing one. Mrs. Parten
chose to build her house in front of ours and at an angle facing
across our property, using the view over our property for her lakeside
windows.
Mrs. Parten has lived in the immediate area for about 15 years so was
aware of our family desire for reasonable privacy. Since we put in
the patio 18 years ago, we planted evergreens along the north property
line by our patio giving us a growth of approximately 6 feet.
About five years ago on the property directly south of us, the
village allowed the Partens to subdivid^i their property so they could
sell the lot when it did not meet the width requirement at the building
line. When the new house to the south of us was built, they built
their deck looking over our property at which time we built a fence
for some privacy as that area had been all wooded.
Being well aware of our family*s desire for reasonable privacy,
Mrs. Parten chose to design her house in such a way that her deck and
large window are directly above our patio.
We are asking for a variance to construct a fence approximately
22 feet long and 11 feet high to give us some reasonable privacy.
With the evergreens we planted, we need an additional five feet of
height to the fence to aquire the reasonable privacy our family
desires when we are using our patio and family room.
i
11
1:^
Mrs. Robert H. Gasch
1030 Tonkawa Road
Long Lake, Minnesota
55356
' I
f !
For Planning Commission Members a
Council Members ONLY
The developement of the lot to the north of our property has been most distressful to our family.
Mrs. Parten chose to burn down the old cottage and it was done
in such a way that thousands of gallons of water had to be poured on
our roof to keep our home from being damaged by the heat. This
caused water in our basement and two of our trees had some damage.
Now whenever it rains, which hasn't been too often this summer,
the water and soil from their property drain down onto the north side
of our house. We have been patiently tolerating this situation until
the final grading is done. We thought this would be done before
winter as we are very concerned about spring runoff. This has not
yet been done.
Then the placement of their house in front of ours, looking
over our property.
Then when the deck was built in that location, we felt it was
more than we could tolerate. This, we felt, was directly affecting
our peace of mind and reasonable privacy.
We have the greatest desire to be friendly with all our neighbors
but Just not that friendly!
If you come to view the location of the fence, please give me a
call before you come so you can view the area from our family room.
Thanks so much, '
n
\\-
I
Ma'^r'e, Y, (o2e<:VC.,.s., v..
^1 )/Ai Vr-rTi
jildjC^inifacA
TSC>n
i A '.I *'i
..:i\;
^ ». r (^ V \ N* * J .* ‘ •
.'0“( ' *■!'■» ■.• ^.v
n ■n
D.vrr:
ni -V '•<'n<on. f'itv V’pinistrntor
liank '•uliic ’j, ~oni:i}’. k’.r.ini-U rntor
..’ovcrWcr l'\
SU!VT!!rr: \'ictorin Train ron^nnn'* - *’orth \ni ^Vivo
vision (Prcl irinan*)
.
.9 ‘ '
l-raMcr <\ Associates, ronn ’scntinn tlio ^'ictoria Train Torinany, is renuestin"
annroval ♦‘or a subdivision of a parcel consistitv of annroxinatcly ^7 acres into
6 !>nil'.Ur.c sites and one co ’^on ontlot of v;otlands. I.acb tlie 6 buildinp sites
W'^ts or exceeds the nimlrum 2 acre dn' builikable area according to tlie survey
sulMnittetl. 'Huj; has not been conTiTned bv other a<',encies as vet. 'Hie develoner
is seeVinn conce>''t vie»av>ints of the I'lannin," Corrussion before investing too
inich into t!\e nroioct.
Hien t!ie a’v»lication was first subnitted, T \.;as unable to cl'.eck t!ie nlan in
detail as to its con ♦‘or'in<^ to t^'C r.ordn*’ requi r^rents. The ”iain tonic of dis
cuss inn at ti'iat ti"ie vas t’lc reoiiest for drodqinr* of tlie nronosed cliannel.
Mule reviewing the nlans later, I fouml tliat they do not confom to all the
zoninf ’ rcviuiiX'Pients , 'I”ae 13 ’ and 30' set!>acl s noted on tlm nlan should be .30'
and 30' as ix'ouired in a 2 acre zonino district. V!u* .30' access road shoul.l be
30'. Tne cojuon doci^ facilitv results in sone'.''»at of an outlot.
The ‘Mannin*’ Cormission should schedule a hiblic ’/.'arirv’ for this nrorxasal.
op
T' ,
1
♦ 4
X
A
y
cm OF ORONO, ^^^INES0TA
Conditional Use and Variance Applicatii
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Address North Arm Drive______________________
Legal Description s 1/2. sec. 6. T117 . R23
APPLICANT
Victoria Grain Company
Agfent ; Brauer & Associates .Incfhone t 941-1660
Address 6440 Flvina Cloud Drive. Eden Prairie, MN
aVNER
Victoria Grain Company
Name Bob Caraill/Richard Doherty Phone # 371-3888
Address 915 Grain Exchange< Minneapolis > MN
Present Zoning lr -IA Present Use lr -ia
, . « #125-#167
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request3i.830-31>840
34.540
Specify Ordinance Requirements _SeeatLtached
TYPE OF REQUEST
\
/ Conditional Use
J? Variance
/Y Wetlands Variance
Riprap
Fee
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Date
Approved
Denied
:V
\
Explain Request Relative to Requireitients Request wetlands variance to dredge
25* wide channel 600* long to provide water access to the riparian
lots involved and construct 1 permanent docking facility for 7 proposed
The non-conformity is the dredging ofslips.
thA ^ itself^ ia notExtent of Non-confoimity .C!
a non-conformity as these lots are all riparian to Lake Minnetonka.
Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting tius Variance or Conditional Use Pennitl As all 6 lots are riparian to Lake minnetonka, access is or prime importanfci
Preserving the environment and the ecosystem of the Lake Minnetonka area
is equally important, that is the reason for proposing one common dock
far-il-ity and one channel, which is far less intrusive upon the land than
is individual channels and docks, which is the other alternative. The
■material dredaed would be significantly less for one proposed channel than
si.x
MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
1. Application completed
2. Plat Map Section
3. Survey (SKetcIi in proposal)
4. Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (300 ft.) (150 ft.) -
from Hennepin County Registrar of
Deeds
5. $30.00 Fee
Date Signature
4'
CITY OF ORONO» MINNESOTA
Land Use Application
. -•> ■
Case No.
•• /
Fee //
Date November 3. 1976_
Street Location of Property; North Arm Drive
Legal Description of Property:
Victoria Grain Co.
Owner; sob caraill/Richard Doherty __915 Gram Exchange, Mpls
' (Addres^ (Phone)
371-3888
lype of Request:Rezoning
Variance
Conditional Use Pexmit
Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Reauest:03C3
oiqisPiA* 09.
Brauer & Associates. Inc.V^A»*^l_
(Applicant)
victoria Grain Co.
(Owner)
id
ii
i
Please draw or attach a sketch of proposed structure showing the following:
Indicate North 6.
Location on Lot 7.
Adjacent Street Names 8.
Location of setback and use of adjacent
existing building.
Distances between any proposed structures
and structures on adjacent property.
Exhibit Submitted:
Dimensions of proposed structure
Proposed setba^s
Zoning in force in this area
Map or plat showing the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries
or the property affected by proposed change.
Abstractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of the owners of
the land within 300 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting ^e change or rezoning
as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Bennepin County.
Petition showing 50t of property earners within 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance.
Village recoimiendations:
‘
▼ W V I
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
NAME
c
Ihoma^ n WiI
ADDRESS
nf=-ri L?\irvA-^')i )r\.'c±\) lf~>^
{TJat M^0'7 0
^^'xT'fv or. —5
- >>^io . Y------- —
\ract. (L
E^rBri<A<aco
B.L.VleijfiVdbfirin
CPlaf
n^^'lw^^lcv.n ^ySJ)
-s
(<yuG r>V.)Ow<r'-'^
Ig ^i v Av ^ ()
ab
rtt I hof-r/.'i ■'
i^Tcwi ‘.//‘)‘-'-l
Serl-j
Vec^^•re .
iOll OOL-L l
Irad: tr
\r^t -Ji)
reeiC
Vzde K
n-r'^A
LV\c^t^\^OL>)
^CA?>t)(lir. '?c
\ —rr—\ ^ 45c^ ^ ^
Wjv V^'VV i-j ., - •). L jv
; LaVie\)fev<., '''■“-' n'll Vl K\ A I (A.'o^ ^ vj\.
lafCla !\i. Dre\i'v:^A Aifvivi'A
\AA l^a
Ri.VLrAfebex-n ' I Px 'Y r /1ktr
Ak'v’ad > (r^i
I PU\- 'A o'I AC )\
^.^SoV}A \ ^ n 3(0 ^
MlINNtMrULli , nn ODHO/
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
NAME ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION
_ at ^\^^b9d)
' _TR(wa^.V)i
t \
»viiL /\ V-^la-k
k I— tl k^.Ll\0 vOn'X^ UAvi;e, b Hajc^
LhviicA t ^bi^^
^vto ^'tW
I tJ* t
on t I f'
trd tn:*' r
Vcn •«; It
re.orif; of
LOT
\
<5
-f
BLK.
6
■5
6
PARCEL
aoco_
6/OC)
^lUCl
oia^^
f.*
?.» 'f I7|
» f"** G 1. t
• rj. t .1
Hem,
• 4* ^
• G? L
: n <-rr I*
'.I rf i:^^( *
*J..t«» rjri
Cc. l-'pa
1. KHOWW
nleO
ne
r*na.
the
KC
(!g3
mMK
r ’’ ■V; • t,o|j
■/.
:?■-
e %
m
1
:*m
IP;.Pick T'Cnson, Citv .Viministrntor
FRfTi:
nATl-.:
SI: R11-rr:
Hank 'hiliich, Zoninr Adninistrator
Hovcntf)cr 1*^, 197('
y--
I
Janes iR HcCloarv' - 3Mn i’.avsido Roail
fonditional iisc Pemit - I'.enlacc All lixistinp, fltmctnros on Pronertv
’.Vitfi ')nc Stnictiire iimial to Tins Total 'ren
Vr. '’crionr)' is a^ain •n'qiicstijn’ a Conditional Use Rernit to renove all ('xistinn
structures oil his nronertv and reelaro this with one nw structure of cnual
nnr*re‘’ate area for cortinuinn nrosent use wiiich includes a Conditional I'so Pen^it
for th serv'ino of soin"* ami samhviches.
,=l
i
: I
L
I
»/
y ft
» #m \-i~ lie
OF ORGNO, MINNESOTA
Conditional Use and Variance Application
I w y *• *
{I fi <
i / J
^ • V
f.:y; ,^'5
ii;
rz7 TYPEyttlfA^sW
Legal Description ^ ^/ocC 7^ /^yjMe
APPLICANT ^ ^ , ii_ //
Name ^IAf€S ________Phone »
Address ^^7 ^fJu^ ^Xcc/jt(/i^^ /Pft^
X Conditional Use
___ Variance
_ _Wetlands Variance
_ _ Riprap
aVNER
Name Phone # 3l^f ^
Present Zoning _______Present Use //[At tn
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3^
Specify Ordinance Requirements no^.-
f jtr\ tf
3^^ fee
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Date
Approved
Denied
cy^
T/^g/yy^ir/ 'fa
Explain Request Relative to Requirements </ C//J ///j ^ \r sfVuchjttej
_ L^/gtf/rciii/ piAu'pui
Extent of Non-confonnity /
Hardships to Pr^rty (Your reasms for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit;
yjr//t*'0C4i W<
dL ‘iiC. ^^rt/enf /ess /4</^
(A/<ju.(d lot CoKi^c/xti 0( ifeu/ty^ sfytii
s/dsfi
MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
1. Application completed
2. Plat Map Section
3. Survey (Sketdi in proposal)
Date /'////;<
4. Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (300 ft.) (150 ft.) -
from Hennepin County Registrar of
Deeds
5. $30.00 Fee
Signature
. ?'■ ■»
■i?.
* -•', i' »j-
it* , •♦■.
.I-;'
^ ;'i • -•■•
1*'* ■' -■'
i .i
>»
/
»•:
!;
i ' "
i 7
•\* I /
X 4
» >
»' V
V4
• ^
» •5 .•fff --------
7' ■ •* • 1*4// ’
■■j
ft
?c
i iim io
^ i Oi
1 ?o i:
ONKA
P’.-i
® Vi
AVE
C
»»^
:• »
si
50 "
CRESTVIEW hi “a L ave ^
I
!<>/ I
fw' r;(^ . %
;! s ‘ * . ■•
. ‘‘-v ■ •'11 A *
'•■. ■> ■■?’■. /? ‘, • ■ ^1 1* ’‘r 4: -f •'
< ■‘VJ- ■’• •* 1
O l‘ ^
i ’
it * • '*V 4 s ^,**
i' * . •'• '• . ►
* * 1n 1
• *
\
\ ^
<,c
^ »f
(>i
C n
V,
^ 1
\f
V' I
I •!’■’ TOWN
tt^ii i’
■ ‘OC-’S,.
tXlliftHIHMI
7o
70
3. ayfj-Sf a ^'Tyo
V
\
TO:
vm\:
HAT!':
5TlJ:Ui:CT:
lUcK r.enson, fitv A«.li'unistrator
Hauls "lUliiclj, Zoninci Atlninistrator
'.'ov'cnl'tor in, in*’'»
y
Harrison .Toluiston, .Tr. - 023 H'illow Drive Soutli
Conditionnl Use Pemit T, Variance - Dredfiinp Uxistinp Pond For
Duels Pond
<1
■
.‘.Si
V'"
'I
if
Mr. .Jolinston now has a snail nond located cast and south of his residence. Tt
is currently filled with duck weed and he is requestinr annroval to dredge
nSout 2n* nlonR the south and cast shoreline and build up this shoreline with
a noiind for protection ayninst this weed and provide a duck pond for an ideal
fceilinp. and nesting area. Tliis would require a variance fron our wetlands
regulations .and a Conditional Use Pemit for this.
'*1
•. ji: ^f -s _ ■* - ^Tik
■* !?^^E
M
A
'V
a
5.
cmf OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
Conditional Use and Variance Application
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
925 Willow Drive South, Wayzota, Minnesotn 55391
Address Dist. 38; Plat 41310; Porcel 0900, School Dist. ?78;
Water Shed Section Olu 11/ iec./Lot UIU; Towhship 117;
Ugal Description Range 23; Acres 13.05; E 717 Ft of Thnt Port
Ann* Govt, lot 7APPLICANT
TYPE OF REQUEST
X Conditional Use
X Variance
•: »M -Harrison R. Johnston. Jr.Phone # 473-9554
Address 925 Willow Drive South, Wayzato, Minnesota 55391
Wetlands Variance
Riprap
Fee iU ‘'Hfk
.•A'la
Name
I
same os above Phone #FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Address Date
Present Zoning rr ir _________Present Use Res
ling Ordinance Section Relating to Request 31.830
*cify Ordinance Requireinents No dredging or filling wetlands.
Approwd
Denied
it Qf swnmpjc
Explain Request Relative to Requirefnents Modify existing duck pond by dredging 20* dong
West A South edge of pond to create n protective bank to control duck weed, etc._____
3m,
&Ctent of Non-Conforraity No dredging or grading of wetlands without all necessary permits.
Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit)
To improve duck weed control, ducic feeding and nesting conditions and general oppeoronce of pond.
Lv' ■ •
MATERIAL NFCESS.ARY POR COT^HTTE APPLICATION
(^ilst be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
Application coftroleted
Plat Map Section
Survey (Sketch in proi
Date /A >
4. Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (300 ft.)cJ: i.i
from Hennepin County Piigistrar of
Deeds
5. ^lam Feevs.,.. .
Signature
November 2, 1976
Mr* Henry Muhich
Planning G>mmission
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Boy, Minnesota 55323
RE: Application to modify Duck Pond
Dear Mr. Muhich:
r
THE mflPLE PLfiin
I
Attached please find the completed Conditional Use and Variance Application .im along with
a photo section mop of the French Lake area and a sketch of the proposed ition to our
pond.
I have also requested from the Hennepin County Government Center, a Certified Property Owner's
List (see attached letter).
I have contacted the Department of Natural Resourses (296-7523) and the Water Shed District
(473-4224) and will be receiving application/permit forms from them - hopefully within the next
few days.
I understand the application f^e is $40 and am enclosing a check for that amount.
If there is any additional infomiotion you need from me, please give me a call: (Business 479-1951)
(Home 473-9554), Many thanks for your assistance.
Attachments
y
-r
November 5, 1976
Is 'N “Ti - r <*• *^ j :!J; [' V’
i I M
?v
VILLAG6 06 ORONO
if ♦ ■ ’■ 9 ^ r<
^51)
f
Deporfment of Nafural Resources
Division of Wafers, Soils & Minerals
Regulafions Unit
Centennial Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Board of Managers
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Box 387
Woyzata, Minnesota 55391
Planning Commission
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota
:<• J. >•:
55323
Gentlemen:
Thank you for the various forms and your help.
TKE iTlRFLE Plfiin
Attached are the completed forms, fees and other items you requested along with copies of
correspondence and forms requested by the other official bodies concerned with my cpplica*
tion to modify a small pond on our property.
Please give me a call if you have any questions or I've overlooked anything,
like to complete this job by Christmas if approved, and weather permitting.
Sincerely,4 ,,
H. R./joy)ston, J/.
Chairman/of the B^rd
HRJqsb
Attochments
I'd very much
• % ^
J-'
1^1
H« R. Johnston, Jr,
utt'AKL'i.Si jt SAILXAL KEiOURCES * /
Division of Katcrs. Soils « Minerals * ,r^.
ilCATION FOR PERMIT TO WORK IN PUBLIC N/SSs '
t '
9-'t
iA
•.:i
. i
J
i \
(print or tyre applicant ’» nan*)
quarter section(s) _ _ _ _ _ _, sectlon(s) _ _ _ _ _ _. township no.(s) 117 . rango(s) 23
the owner of lend in Govemaent lot(s)
117
010
925 Willow Drive South
(i'ivc no.f box no. cr iiddreee)Wqyzoto # Mlnnesoto 5539 1
(lotf block S subdivision)
county (ies) Hcnngpm , which is riparian to French Lake
(name of lake or etream)applies pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter lOS and other applicable statutes for l 4 w
PROPOSAL
IT IS PROPOSED TO: ^ excavate.^ fill, CO construct. CO remove,
(oheek) CO install, CO abandon, or [gj otherfepect/y; dredge (drogllnel
^ £17 ^re-protection, CO shoreline, CO harbor, CO channel, CO bridge
(aheok) CO culvert, CO wharf, £37 obstruction, or CSJ otheviepeai/yj OUCk ponci ^ *
i'
JUSTIFICATIONExplain why this project is needed:
Pond borders morsh grosses of French Lake. Winds pock dock weed, etc, into pond. Wont
to dredge pond edge to create bonk to control duck weed, improve nesting ond pond oppeor-
once ,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
1. Anticipated changes in water and related land resources:
None
2. Uiavoidable but anticipated detrimental effects:
None
S, Alternatives to the action proposed:
None
PROJECT SITE DATA
1. Describe the type and amount of aquatic vegetation present:
Too much duck weed
2. Describe the nature of the material beneath the water:
Muck and silt
S* Describe the nature of the upland area:
Trees and lawn and natural covers
4. Describe type and amount of nearby shoreland development:
Very little around French Lolce - mostly natural marsh
5. ENCLOSE SKETCH DESCRIBING WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS.
(eee inetruationeJ
(eontinued on reoerae aide)
Water level same os Lake Minnetonka ond French Lake
ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NECnSSARV
>■ •;.»r
.
Chwwtling
Total length (fett) - - — - —
Longth in lake/streaa (fe«t)^ - -
lottos width (feet)
Side slopes (ratio) -------
Average depth (feet)- - - - - -
Gradient ----------
Existing
OONStfUlCHON DATA faZeo atta^jlj^ketoh or droning)
W-S4
Proposed Alterations along shore of pond Proposed
. . .60*Distance along shore (feet)
Distance waterward (feet)- ------ Y5*20'
Thickness of fill aaterial (feet)- - -
Depth of excavation (feet) ------ 3*4
1. Describe type of excavation equipment to be used, if known:
Dragline A C-
2. Describe location (include map) and characteristics of spoil disposal
Moferiol dredge will serve os new bonk for pond
3. Would maintenance excavation be necessary? (check) / 7 YES HD NO
# / rV "?. > wsite proposed:
' 1 ^'» 'O'
Explain:
4. Volume of material to be removed initially (cubic ynrde)'. Muck or silt 50**75
Sand or gravel _ _ _ _ _ _ Rock or stone
^ $15.00 filing fee, fS photographs, SS other (specify) applications tO City of Orory>
declares that information submitted herewith and statements made herein a?e^ coi^^sc^^^ ^
representation of the facts, and that the filing of this application and information with the
Commissioner of Natural Resources is prima facie evidence of the correctness thereof.
OOlPLETE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO:
(1) City of Orono
Dated this 5th day of November 19 76
Ncne of city or tounehip Signed
Box 66, Crystal Boy, MN 55323
street S poet office
mmam
•
(applioant)
«
(2) Minnehaha Creek Address 925 Willow
(leeeee)
Drive South
Name of uatcrahed dietrict
(S) Shoreland Management Administrator City Wayzata
of County
State Minnesota Zip code 55391
State of Minnesota
County of _______
on this
ss.AFFIDAVIT
473-9554 (home)
Phone 479-1951 (office)
day of , 19 before me personnelly appeared
uho being first duly sworn and to me known to be the person _
application, acknowledge(s) that_ _ _ _ _executed the same as
who executed the foregoing
own free act and deed and
that the statements, naps, plans, documents, and other supporting data are true and correct according
- best knowledge and belief.
Notary Public County
My commission expires
1
i
.;
1
‘1t
.’i
»
1
•i
?
A
■ -ru arrif m
74 STATE OF MINNESOTA A
r^ARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES ^
Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals
NOTIFICATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION
i
♦
<
'4
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT
Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.44, Subdivision 1, requires you to supply a complete copy
and all supporting data of your water permit application to the following:
A)
B)
The chief executive officer of the city or township within which
the project is located.
The secretary of the Board of Managers of the watershed district,
if any, within which your project is located or which your project
may affect.
You WST certify having served the complete application on the above in the box on the back
side of the application form W-54.
W ADDITION, if your project is NOT located in a city, a complete copy and all supporting
data of the application should be submitted to the Administrator of the Shoreland Manage
ment Program for the affected county.
Complete this fora for each notice served on a local government official.
SECTION I (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANTS
TO: A) Chief executive officer of the (check)
SJ city, CJ township of _ _ _ _ _ORONO
Tprint or type name)
B) Secretary of the board of managers of theMinnehoho Creek watershed district.
(print or type name)
C) Administrator of the shoreland management program of county.
H.R. Johnston, Jr. ^prtnt or type name)
925 Willow Drive South
Woyzoto, Minnesoto 55391
(print or type name and addreaa of appUcant)
Date:November 6, 19 76
4
•i
)
i
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE LOCAL GOVERN^ENT
This report from provides you an opportunity to submit input to the Department of Natural
assist in deciding whether to grant, modify, or deny the requested permit,
it IS NOT absolutely necessary for local agencies to officially approve or disapprove the
project or make any recommendation, although this may be done if desired. It is requested
that local agencies i^ndicate the following, as applicable:
A.
B.
The relationship of the proposed project to local plans for the
affected water and related land.
The relationship of the project to local land use controls including
flood plain and/or shoreland regulations.
(oontimed on reveree aide)
n ^ A
•♦r c.
. n
0.
E.
F.
Any possible eff^l^ of the proposed project on t^[^water resource,
navigation, fish -iind wildlife, conservation, pollution, and the
general public interest.
Any reconmended modifications in the proposal or other alternative
way of achieving the desired objective which would reduce undesirable
effects.
Any pertinent factual data available concerning the water body or the
proposed project.
Reasons for any local objections.
•
Please complete this form and return to the address shown in the lower left comer of
this page within 15 days, if possible, or inform the department if additional time is
needed.
• *****'•*********♦******
SECTION II (TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY^ TOWNSHIP, WATEHSHED DISTRICT OR COUNTY)
The applicant named on the opposite side of this form submitted a copy of his water permit
qpplication on It has been reviewed and the following comments
are submitted for consideration by the Department of Natural Resources.
i
if
i %
y
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)Dated
Return to Gov't Official's name
(prtnt OP type)
DEPAimiENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Waters, Soils ^ Minerals
Regulations Unit
Centennial Building
8t. Paul, MN 55155
Signature
Title
Address
\
1
%s
¥A 4 ,
ne)
MC»» »^ i'DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTEiRn™ MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5548/.]U I ^
'iK’ »
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST y,Li_/VGE 06 C
SroinO
NAME ADDRESS
O)& (LkjJD/LOiQ-
Wat
. 3anctfc . ,VV|co<'<2-iner^.
H r wi I
Hc o K). 01d|'. s*:
5^!P». \)i \\e«yi
V
\ 5o\uis \\crt cled.1
V |vn/) jOOOljiJ-WoO'Dr J.
t JiLdrvOI n \
i.)ii\iotsUeOck-A (f >
i \\ *x~^ -rr- . \ U. . t\Ou3
"41
<opF(Oa
LPlabm^C^
'^^tcL c^btoo')
DESCRIPTION
401
>
LOT BLK.PARCEL
/H50_
60/0
6 obO.
6(5..3 0-
/ff‘2??6_
i .i
\RCEL
r
Fn»l:
DATC:
SURJECT:
Dick Benson, City Administrator
Hank 'kihich, Zoning Administrator
.'Jovcmbcr 10, 1076
.Tar.es Snv<^cr - 1085 llcritapr* I.anc
Variance - Ix^t V.’ivlth Aren 5 Side Yard Setback for House Addition -
Vari.ancc Fron 26 ’ Mnrshl.and Sotback
0/0
o'SO
90
9(00
Hr. Snyder is requesting a variance for a Tiousc addition on a lot 100’ wide witii
an area of apnroximatcly 1 acre. Oeouirenents in this district are 2 acres and
200’ lot width. A side yard set)>ack variance of 40’ would also lie nccessarv'
as tlie proposed setback is only 10' where 50’ is n'ouired.
In checking tliif? proposal, it appears a v.ariance from tlic 26’ marshland setback
would also be nccessarv' as the pror»osc(i addition appears to be somewhat closer
to some marsh vecjet.ation behind Tns house.
The project was started without a buildinp permit or necessary vari^ces. T!ie
foiouiation was alreatly completed before a nool contractor made application for
a pool permit. Ke posted a "Stop V'ork" order .aiul informed the owner of the
procedures nccessarv' for obtaining permission to continue.
3 *•
‘
i
f li
/ V
t
u
m •cm OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
Conditional Use and Variance Application
IjOCATlON OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Address
Legal Description ^Q'T' 4^ >2 /gA/^CL,
APPLICANT
Name \ ^ ■. S0U</pt=/C, Phone «
Address /^Q ^_ _ _ _ _ _
OMNER
Name_ _ _ _ _Phone »
Address
Present Zoning tA Present Use /2es.
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
Specify Ordinance Rsquirements
■ i
TYPE OF REQUEST
Conditional Use
y Variance
Wetlands Variance
J;
Riprap
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Date
Approved
Denied
Explain Request Relative to Requirements _ _ _ _ _
3ht30 .y y
//
m y>/g^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Extent of Non-confonnity r CAx^/A^t^_________
J9^/y “ oa^/A4*e£. CtL ce/^elr ^• 9if%
Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Pemi^
2l:ulz76
MATCRIAL NECESSARY FOR C0H>I£IE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
Application conpleted
P]^at Map Section
Survey (Sketch in proposal)
4, Certified Property Owi^r*s List of
owners within (150 ft.)
from Hennepin County Registrar oi
. Deeds
5. * $30.00 Fee
..»^ Signature y
* V:.Oak Riose Turns Co.- '• Jud
I-
*94/S
*j_89%
end^
i .
\
\
^1
d:>.
\
" 4 A
yt).
'///
I//V..
rv^»r
//
I'
•4v*i
X
i
'«■
a Pd/7(?/es IVffoP 3 fane
O /n?/7 Af<P/7C//77^*^ /$
(\OO.O)/P^/7of£0 £/al/A^/ 0/7
B. V\.p£/?oUs 0€/?c/j
L 3<. .£. Prop. L/r?e.£y/:
\
«'•
j>
. I' \'-^x. L
i‘'^' /(,• 'it/'
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORKECT REPRESENTATION
OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF:
LOT 4, BLOCK 2, FOXHILL
AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, THEItEON, AND ALL VISIBLE
ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY
ME THIS lOth DAY OF MAY 1966.
Revised Tt> Show Proposed
VbUse u-s-Ti
/I M » • ■•
Land Surveyor Minn. Reg, No. 7979
' j(PA/^V7'S<^/\/ /vc:r.
£/7^r^—^^yrv/d*<^or^
WWW *.
-• 7. ■
f
. » . -
i “ *
• ■'V
.•f
/
MC5!.«.
l^)OPt
UtKAKintm ur rirjMMLL A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ^ Z if 3romo
NAME ADDRESS
Wi i \
DESCRIPTION
2.\er
loton
iioo
t4*^C^ tec
ip7^r> Her»'tcv^^t Ur»nfe
(}llfw\efi LAp^z-ata /i: A ^ \ vW-Ci co9=* looe
t '5aDfiC£> ft OO\p?5f ‘(I>000 (
V I 11 l\ ic>5)0 v-o^c.
pr^rMW ILOQt^zcjCo /
jcnb €o^>r<xoo Rd
0'TO(\C
Ool\ot
LOT BLK.
\
PARCEL
(9.600-
6000-
6500j
6600.
pms
•I
J.i ...f. ■ -r
•:/ •, ' ‘ . i-
■*
* A . ^
■II •»
■i
A.
t
i
\
\
I
<'
‘<v'/
.'‘r^
r'.it
vV'
lr>^'
i' r t
' V
V 1 • •
t>f%:
4
. * *
f'i-'
■‘ f/: ‘.
...:-,V:'-
♦i: '
-?v ,
< **
•1
S
r'
I <a)
. :j
A'
.'i
ci:
<:
4
N
J
. *<
0
J
;
>
3
J
c!
~j
•J r
o
-V?
Js
‘ %
i
j
•>
15
^ )
J
J
']
m r • •
1 •
s 1 "■T
-J>o .
t
J =>o
J
U.
•-4)
1
J
«i i\r?* r
>
>
r yj
♦
\ .
V
0^
J
U
J j O"
'4
J /■N
1/
U
J
D'?.
!!
■ y
I.
%r
J
^ A
• A r
* • ’ ^
r;.
r‘:^
I
t
'»
/ h
:a^
-yi
T(i
f ;«if
«yi M
i:
V ■ ‘
V.
V:
>.
■.
1
FOXHILL ASSOCIATION
C/0 D. L. Condon
1023 Heritage Lane
Wayzata, Minnesota 35391
rl
i
I
J
■ i
r
*1
f
' ,)A i
.1
‘ n
November 10» 1976
Village of Orono
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 33323'
Re: Construction of swimming pool on James Snyder property
Gentlemen:
This will acknowledge that the Foxhlll Association has no objection to the
construction of an Indoor swimming pool built as a part of the residence of
James Snyder at 1083 Heritage Lane In the Village of Orono.
\» I
Very truly yo^^.
D. L. Condon
Treasuv^ri Foxhlll Association
V S'X
\\
ti
Ll^JV^Janke
Vice President, Foxhlll Association 1
*1
■f]
i
#•>
f
ritMfc^rttrinznfiTi
<¥' *
Tf'):
mu-:
SUKTKCT:
'0P_F^-. ' j-■ .
■ J
ir
f
.X \
i.
. ^
^ cm OF ORONO, MINNESOTA ^ ' ft
Ccnditional Use and Vatiance ApplicatioiF * r-^sy
UlCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Legal Pescriptioit i^^iA/^ . h
APPLICAMT // //
/^/ird fU,^oAueAi Phone # V7^ ^ y
Address JL4 ? 0 i(3»r/go /^V; € e </*/<
OWNER
Name K _ _ _ _ _
Address l-^d ^ /j/^ ^
Phone
Present Zoning ^ ^Present Use_2 . <
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request ^([ fj
Specify Ordinance Requirements
TYPE OF REQUEST
_Conditional Use
^ Variance
_Wetlands Variance
_Riprap
Fee
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Council Action
Approved
Denied
/ 0 4i . /u AJ <
Explain Request Relative tc Requirements (;> S X* i jj' if* c.^;( <'
«t-I/aIl (
Extent of Non*con£onnity
Sl*U fHid-L
rO sj
Hardships to Property (Your r&asais for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit
---------cl i 4 A^|»/4ICC- .______
----------< V /?^ rtv\^ C t }xj/o loo^A -&g- a 1 c.
hi n '%‘fi t'd tl(K. t'^ic J- .1/ tj L, o't',
MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be sulmiitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
1. Application completed
2. Plat Map Section
3. Survey (Sketch in proposal)
4. Certified Property Owner's List of
owners within (300 ft.) (150 ft.) -
from Hennepin County Registrar of
Deeds-—^
5^ $30.00
■ u
Date • i I9 /j Signatu^ ^ / c
.J
•N
■MM
I
\
\
I
•f.V • = 1
V 4
’Ji'
m *38.030. Signs in B and I Districts. Within the "B” and "I” Districts nameplate signs and business signs are permitte subject to the following regulations!
38.031. B-1# B-2 and B-4; Size. Within the "B-l",
and "B-4" Districts, the aggregate square footage
of sign sosce per lot shall not exceed the sum of one
(1) sauare foot for each front foot of building, plus one
square foot for each front foot of lot not occupied by a
building. No individual sign shall exceed 50 square feet.
(Amended Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75)
'38.032*. B-3: Size. Within the ^
aggregate seuare tootaae of sign space per
exceed the sum of four (4) sauare feet per front foot of
building, plus one (1) square foot per ^_
property not occupied by a building. No individu J
surface shall exceed 100 square feet.
(1)
the sum of four (4) square feet per front foot
plus one (1) sauare foot per front loot of property not
occupied by a building. No individual sign surface shall
exceed 100 square feet.
38.034 . B-1. B-2, and B-4; Hoi.ihl. Within the "B-1",
"B-2" and "B-4" Districts, no si<jn shall extend in
height more than two (2) feet above the
wall or oarapet of any principal building nor shall an/
sign be located closer than ten (10) feet from any prop-
ertv line except that any sign over ten (10) square fee
may'project two (2) feet into any reouired yard area
from the principal building.
(Amended Ord. 172, 12-19-74, offcctn'c 1-1-75)
->H n35 B-3 and I: lloiqht. Within any "B-3" or "I"
DistrUt,~no siqn sh.m:~5Stond in h. iqht more than si>c
feet in heUiht above the hinhest outside wall or parapet
of anv principal buildinq. No siqn shall bo located
closer than ten (10) feet from any property line except
tharLy sign exceeding ten (10) square feet may proioct
only*two (2) feet into the yard area from any building.
N
/
rE^x*T5sai?”f3BSBEt!!r'7-'t;;-f^w-
: - . ■ ■■'-:• •.-:'
W »♦- > V."
\'y-''
r;-- •• ••'■ ' "r.j.U : '.■: ' .•. . r •'-.?»••M > ■ ^ ^‘ ■ >V. V v' ■.. '
'V ■: - V ; .
------* W<» ................«*•- >
-•-«(< i-*t »Jt 4~* ' i-. • .
v'v- '
Sills.::
.....
,•! ■.. ..r ’.
'••tfb^'^ll* jWfcr • w .ei^.- w*». ...
. . ■*> :%i
.......
1.1
■t, ..■('■, f
■ .'9* ‘ '
Mm
v'
I..
•H: • •*►7"*' •'*•'■*» v«K......;>., .uV-,.. ,.
k- ■
IV' ... - ■ ’■*. >’■'..•..1 -.
■'*V».r '.^-•.».,|r» •■• • ■
■'^h, ■ ■ ■:«'« ■.;
r T* -* •
T •’
■ {.S'*.? ■
= :...^ii»’.; ■■
i -
-'v'-/ew "*
C"’“» •
.'‘iS >
■ ‘ • : '
" '''*■'
f.
PL^.kj
*.<.a .L«. - l"e XO’ o**
S::#'
'.- ■.'.in •
CBwrere. Liisii; OP TUus-
■jorooM T. cqpbi.> ■T'jrwkvow.-
p«.-r«.D- fc-ifc-v^ i^a.uo. fcofe^-
■LiVy
.'S- .
V
* •
V
.i
*,‘..i..
#iys
-SF^
FOR
PROJECT # 7&S/0
JhiWoz:
WAURE.M 0«eTE.NB l_A.CS INC
E'T’SO CAa.c.o Point R£> , Obqino . /mnn
data raiDfirkA
1-4
iSi fir>r I,' A'.i- . ...?
mi:
■A-i> - ‘ ■'•■.V'%' '
;S?^:
-V :■ ■■'. . :, ■ ;;-v
':.■ . S-,‘j’'i
,rpl;.;'-:'JS..'. ' ■r’': ’■ •'>'"■• ' ' ’ '
■■I——«•»«*——1 Ml.................................. A., -------.,;■■■ Hill ■'a» ^
■;.■
i ■•;/,' •■;. :
wote :
tHANf-E CXI^T DOCVP
rp S-C PIPE PCVOR
V
g<\prERi
:'-c
t-l.lO BEi>A-«
■'-'•‘.DiRrRySS '■^VEP
Non
4 SLAB UNDER
W/ip,« ’■/•'> 'fO NSE&ii
rooriNC. ii3'itj''A/
>•*'4 RE-ROD
5>l }DER
NEW LARA E
truss CvEtt
?:o* cs't'”
■ ■-'f s
! * 1
^AHiACE DOtfR )AovEl>^
I rftQW\E«lST HOUSE I J
r'
fj..
' O- !p ..' ^ ■ I . La -r^f ._y
FUOC:>U PLAK
SCALE
.. MVr t
' , : I
• ■ ■ ■%.' »1 1
30'privt^^e drive easenienl
15's^tback
V 1~'. :i 50'r ow easement
legal description:
owner:Victoria Grain
Robert Cargill, Richard Doherty
rK)tes-
• 50' setback f om high water line
• 30' front yard sefbivk
• 15 ’ sideyard jetba k
Q
03
Z) ^
if) <
UJ ^cc P
y O,#200 >
—V"
noitth
)ING PLAN 1 =100 ! nokh