Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-17-1976 Planning Packetr AGENDA PLANNING CO^^^SSION MEETING OF M\Y 17, 1976 I.CURRENT ITEMS A.Action Items 1. 2. 3. 4. . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Multi-Family Zoning Ordinance - Public Hearing - 7:30 P.M. Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 3, 1976 #101 and #104 - Dan Lindsay - Kelly Avenue Holding Company Rezoning, SubdivisicHi and P.R.D. #107 - Alan Sweetser - 345 Old Long Lake Road Preliminary Subdivision - Revised Proposal #109 - 315 East Grant Corporation - 3340 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit #103 - John Lambin (Burger King) - 3340 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit #119 - Robert Roessel - 65 Cygnet Place Conditional Use Permit - Horses Variance - Access Building with no main street and setback #122 - Joseph Jacobs - 420 Tumham Road Conditional Use Permit - Horses Variance - Number of horses and stable setback #125 - Tom Vickeiman - 679 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Conditional Use Permit Removal of trees and grading within 75' shoreline setback #128 - Boeye-Anderson-Veda - 500 North Arm Drive Subdivision - Lot Rearrangement Schedule Public Hearing #48 - diaries Cox - 3580 Ivy Place Final Subdivision Approval #84 - Hildur Hollander - 345 Spring Hill Road Final vSubdivision Approval B.Work Session Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. #127 - Ken Heroux - 4445 North Shore Drive Rip Rap #129 - Steve Ploivman - 4445 Margaret Circle Rip Rap #130 - Joe Braun - 3020 Casco Point Road Rip Rap #131 - Stewart Perry - 2975 Casco Point Road Variance and Conditional Use Permit for filling, grading and terracing witliin 75' of shoreline #132 • Lester Raskob - 4220 Chippewa Avenue Variance - Lot area PLANNING C0M^SS;ON AGENDA - May 17, 1976 C. Incomplete Items 1. #114 - Kem Hoppe - 2608 and 2610 Mapleridge Lane Subdivision Public Hearing scheduled for June 8, 1976 2. #120 - James Sidwell - 1375 Park Drive Subdivision - Public Hearing scheduled for June 8, 1976 II. Completed Items for Council A. Completed Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. #73-A #111 - #112 - #113 - #115 - #116 - #117 - #118 - #121 - #124 - - Philip Dykstra - 3080 Casco Point Road Subdivision - Concurred George Jenos - 3030 Casco Point Road Rip Rap - Concurred Vincent Johnson - 601 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Variance - Concurred Sheldon Quast - 235 Crestview Avenue Variance - Concurred Don Hagen - 2130 Shadywood Road Rip Rap - Concurred Dave Ojjheim 1430 Cherry Place Variance - Concurred Lorenz Kutz - 1462 Park Drive Variance - Concurred James Hansen - 884 Dakota Avenue Variance - Concurred Pat Wells - 951 Spring Hill Road Variance - Concurred James Abbott - 1000 South Browii Road Conditional Use Permit - Concurred •' -1 i. r ♦ /. ;L . V // >»»> f- 17- 7C CITY OF ORONO DISCUSSION DRAFT M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District Wehrman, Chapman Associates, Inc. Planning Consultants March, 1976 Revised April 21, 1976 to include Planning Commission recommendations of April 19. 3X.000. M-6: Multiple Family Planned Residential District 3X.100 M-6: Purpose. The "M-6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow multiple dwellings in those areas where such development fits the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, where properly related to other land uses, where there is immediate access to adequate existing arterial high­ ways and public sanitary sewer and in no cciss where located within 1,000 feet of the Lake Minnetonka Shoreline. Rezoning of an area to the "M-6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District may be allowed only after the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is amended to show the poisibility of the future rezoning of that area to the "M- 6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District. Design and development shall follow the spirit ano intent of the land use objectives of Section III-5A of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as adopted , 1974, and the Guiding Principles of Section 30.020 of the Crono Zoning Code. 3X.110 M-6: Peiinitted Uses. Within the M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: One family detached dwellings as regulated in R-IB District Public owned parks and playgrounds. 3X.120 M-6: Conditional Uses, Within any M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by Conditional Use Permit: Any conditional use as regulated in the R-IB District and as further regulated in the M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District. Multiple Family Planned Residential Projects (MPR Project) 3X.130 M-6r Accessory Uses. Within any M-6 Multiple Family Residential District, the following uses shall be permitted uses: Any accessory use as regulated in the R-IA District and as further regulated herein except for "Roadside Stands". -1 I ■w * % * fr *• v\. I » 4 i f 4 V, e*. CITY Cl?* OKOiJO DkAPT M-C-. Multiple Family Planned Residential District Wenrman, Chapman Associates, Inc, Planning Consultants March, 1976 Revised April 21, 19?6 to include Planning Commission recommenda tiona of April 19. .3X.000. M-6; Multiple Family Planned Residential District 3X.100 M-6; PurT^oae, The Multip],e Family Planned Residen­ tial Distr5.ct is intended to provide a district i^iich will allov/ multiple dwellings in those ai*eas where such development fits the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, where properly related to otaer land uses, where there is immediate access to adequate existing arterial highways and public sanitary sewer iind in no case where located within 1,000 feet of the Lake Minnetonka Shoreline. Rezon­ ing of an area to the “M-6” Multiple Family Planned Residential District must comply with Comprehensi /e Land Use Plan or may be allowed only aftei* the Comprehensive Land Uso Plan is amended to snow the possibility of tno future rezoning of that area to the ”M-6*' Multiple Family Planned Residential District. Design and development shall follow the spirit and intent of the laid use objectives of Section III-5A of tho Comprehensive Land Use Plan as adonted , 197^1, and the Giiiding Principles of Section 3C.020 of trie Orono ^ning Code, 3X.110 M-6; Pemitted Uses, Within the M-6 liultiple Family Planned Ptesidential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the folloi>ring uses: Ono family detached dwellings as regulated in R-IB District, Public owned parks and playgrounds. 3X.120 M-6; Conditional Uses. Witiiin any M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District, no st3Tuctui*e or land shall be used for the following uses except by Concitionul Use Pomiit: Any conditional use as regulated in the R-IE District and as further regulated in tne M-6 Multiple Faiaily Planned Residential District, Multiple Family Planned Residential Projects (HPR Project) 3X.130 M-6: Accessory Uses. V/ithin any M-6 Multiple Family Residential district, the following uses shall be permitced uses: Any accessory uso as regulated ir* t*i© R-IA District and as further ref^alaued nox’oin except for "Roadside stands' . -1- -\r r 3v" 3g:i ’1 innii:'* Cort'.1 rsion f 1 1 ~ rr- - * \ • Privately owned buildings containing recreation or social functions, garages, or storage areas for maintenance equipment or rubbish. 3X#140 M~6; Area , Lot Width, Yord Requirements, Height and Hord Cover Requirements, Tre following minimum or maximum requirements shall be observed and apply to all buildings, including accessory buildings except that permitted, conditional anJ occessory uses of the R-IB District as allowed herein shall be regu~ lated by the R-1 B District requirements. 3X.141 Minimum Totol Lot Area. A Multiple Family Planned Residential Project shall not be allowed on a lot of less than five (5) acres. Lots of less than five acres may qualify only if the applicant can show that the minimum lot area should be waived because the proposed project is adjacent to an existing project which has been developed under the provisions of this M-6 District; is designed to create a larger, unified, physically integrated project; and will contribute to the amenities of the neighborhood; or is unfeasible due to physical, geographic or ownership constraints. 3X.142 Density in MPR Project. The minimum gross site area per dwelling unit in an MPR Project and the maximum number and type of units allowed in a Project is based on several factors. The individual lot size for platted lots to be occupied by specific structure types need not conform to the minimum total site area required per dwelling unit but may be compensated for in additional Project open space beyond the required 10% In 3X.150. Under no circumstances shall individual platted lot areas be less than the minimum lot areas In 3X. 146 (a). Factors affecting density are as follows: (a) The area of the site which is dry and buildable based on the Resource Component Analysis (3X.173 (b)), less public right-of-way. (b) The number of bedrooms per unit. (c) The number of each type of building (units per building). (d) Required setbacks. (e) Credits for housing for low and moderate Income individuals and fami­ lies. (f) Required open space. Hard-cover areas. 3X.143 Minimum Site Area Required per Unit based on Number of Bedrooms. (Generally related to minimum floor area required) Efficiency 4,500 sq. ft. (9.7 D.U./ac. or 48/5 ac.) 1 Br. Unit 6,000 sq. ft. (7.3 D.U./ac. or 36/5 ac.) 2 Br. Unit 7,500 sq. ft. (5.8 D.U./oc. or 29/5 ac.) 2- 1 % • 3 Br. Unit 4 Br. Unit 9,000 sq. ft. (4.8 D.U./ac. or 24/5 ac.) 10,000 sq. ft. (4.4 D.U./ac. or 22/ 5 ac.) Not more than 20 percent of the units in any one project shall be efficiencies. Not more than 40 percent of the units in any one project shall be efficiencies and 1 Br. units. (Notes in parenthesis in 3X.143 are for clarification in the review and dicussion stages only and are not intended to be included in final draft. 3X.144 Maximum Percentage of Structures by Type in MPR Project. Single Family Two Family Three Family Four Family (maximum allowed) 10 percent 20 percent 80 percent 80 percent 3X.145 Minimum Lot Requirements in MPR Project. Pro|ect Single Fomily Two Fomily Three Fomily Four Family a* Lot area 5 oc. (high buildable site area) 6,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 16,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft.• I# b. Lot width 300 ft. 50 ft. (on public (on public or street) private street) 65 ft. 80 ft. 100 ft. (on public or (on public or (on public or private street) private street) private street) c. Lot depth 300 120 120 d. Front 35 feet yard from proj ect boundary e. Side 30 feet yard from proj­ ect boundary f. Side 35 feet street yard 120 120 25 feet from public street right-of-way or private street easements. Sum of side yards to be 15 feet,one of which may be 0 feet, but minimum distance between principle structures must be 15 feet unless attached on separate lots. 15 feet from public street right-of-way or private street easements. -3- ! g. Rear yard 30 feef 30 feef 30 feet 30 feef 30 feef h. BuJ Iding 15 feef between principle buildings and between principle building and Separa- occessory buildings on separate lots in project, 10 feet between tion principle and accessory buildings on same lot. 3X.146 Height, No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or 30 feet in height except as provided in Section 38,900. 3X.147 Housing for Low and Moderate Income Persons ond Families. In MPR Projects containing 50 or more units in all construction phases, 10 percent of the total number of units shall be provided for eligible persons or families in the low and moderate income range. This provision may be waived by the City Council if: (a) The percentage of existing low and moderate income housing in the City exceeds the percentage of such units in the Metropolitan area; (b) funds for subsidy program are not available within one year of appli cation; (c) the City Council determines that the site location is inappropriate for such units because of the lack of public and private support services. a. Density Credit: For all eligible Projects providing housing units for low and moderate income persons and families. Cne additional unit will be permitted for each 10 units allowed under the standard site area requirements of the M-6 District. b.Procedure: In order to provide low and moderate income dwelling unitS/ the ap ­ plicant shall propose application($) to the Federal Housing Administration (FHAl of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, (or other source of subsidy funds) under programs for homeownership (including condomin­ iums), rental/ or cooperative housing. The proposal shall conform to the guidelines established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to cost limitations, construction and other standards for development of moderate Income dwelling units under the applicable subsidy program(s). The proponent shall furnish any proposal and supporting documents in the form of exchanges of correspondence with responsible officials of the FHA (or other source of subsidy funds), together with affidavits by the proponent reporting its discus­ sions with such officials, indicating, to the extent then possible, whether there ore uncommitted funds available for projects to develop low and moderate income dwell ­ ing units of the type proposed as well as for other types of units for low and moderate income persons and families. -4 ■i ir-J r"'a g.Rear yard 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 50 feet 30 ft ct li.Building Separa­ tion 15 feet bct\%een principle buildings and between principle building and accessory Iniildings on separate lots in project. 10 feet between principle and accessory buildings on same lot. 3X.146 tieij^t. No structure or building sliall exceed 2-1/2 stories or 30 feet in height except as provided in Section 38.900. 3X.147 Housing for Low and Moderate Income Persons and Families. In MPR Pro jeets containing 50 or more unit.s in all construction phases, 1 unit of every 12 of the total nisnber of units shall be provided for eligible per.'^wis or families in the low and moderate income range. Tlus provision may be wai\'ed by the City Council if: (a)The percentage of existing low and nxxlerate inerme l:ousing in the City exceeds the percentage of such units in the Metropolitan area; (b)funds for subsidy program arc not availal)lc within one year of application ; (c)the City Council determines that the site location is inappropri ate for such units because of the lack of public and private support services. a.Density Credit; For all eligible Projects providing housing units for low and moderate income persons and families. One additional unit will be permitted for each 12 units allowed under the stanvLird site area requirements of the M-6 District. b.Procedure:In orvler to provide low and moderate income dwelling units, the applicant shall propose application(s) to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, (or other source of subsidy funds) under programs for homeownership (including condominiums), rental, or cooperative housing. The proposal shall confonn to the guidelines established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to cost limitations, construction and other standards for development of moderate income dwelling units under the appli­ cable subsidy program(s). The proponent shall furnish any proposal and supporting documents in tlie form of exchanges of correspondence with responsible officials of the F1L\ (or other source of subsidy funds), together with affidavits by the proponent retorting its discussions with such officials, indicating, to the extent then pos.siblc, whether tl»ere are unconinitted funds available for projects to develop low :uid moderate income dwelling units of the t'-pe proposed as well as for oth'r t>pes of units for low and moderate income persons and families. 4- As revised by I’lanning Corunission S/3/7b c.Satisfaction of Requirement Without a Subsidy: An applicant may propose to satisfy all or part of the low and moderate income dwelling unit requirement without utili­ zing a government subsidy program; provided^ however, that prior to Final Plan approval by the Council, the proponent clearly demonstrates and warrants in writ­ ing that the proposal will benefit the same number of families at the same income levels, and for the same rentals or prices, which the low and moderate income dwelling unit requirements are intended to assure. d* Architectural Design Requirement: The architectural design of Low and Moderate Income Dwelling Units will be consistent with the design of the overall MPR Pro­ ject and shall not be physically separated, screened or in any manner made identi­ fiable as distinct from the rest of the development. 3X.147 Hord Cover, The total hard cover on any one Project or lot developed outside of a Project sliall not exceed 35 percent. 3X.150 M-6; Recreotion ond Open Spoce. "M-6“ MPR Projects shall contain an adequate amount of land for park, recreation or local open space use which shall be not less than ten (10) percent of the Project area, or the sum of the minimum floor areas based on the number of bedrooms in 3X. 170 (b), whichever is greater. The park dedication or fee in lieu of land required in the City's Subdivision Regulations and based on the residential density shall be reduced by the common open space provided in an MPR Project subject to the approval of the City Council. The recreation and open space shall be easily accessible to the dwelling unit(s) it is intended to serve. Areas of the site not eligible to meet this requirement are driveways, parking areas, swamps, drainage areas, sumps, public sidewalks, required yard areas and required site area not included in platted lots as allowed in 3X. 142. 3X.151 Operoting and Maintenonce Requii'ements for Community Recreuticp ond Open Spoce in MPR Projects, Common Open Space (defined as that area of the site set aside for the use and enjoyment of all residents in the Project, including residents of lots within a Project which may be under private ownership and on which lots there may or may not be private open space) shall be subject to requirements in 38.630 and 38.640, 3X,160 Building ond Site Design and Construction Requirements. (a)A building permit for a multiple dwelling building shall rot be issued unless the applicant's building plans, including the site plan, are certified by an architect registered in the State of Minnesota stating that the design of the building and site has been prepared under his direct supervision. Any building of Type 1 or 11 construction, os provided in the State Building Code, shall hove its electrical, mechanical and structural systems designed by regis ­ tered engineers. Provisions of this paragraph shall in no way prohibit the preparation of the site plan by a professional site planner. -5- 4 i li I J Project shall contribute to the image and >eauty, spaciousness and high quality. Pro- te elements shall be in good proportion; I; there shall be an appropriate use of ma- ste and not used for dramatic effect but in r environment. The following building exposed exterior wall surfaces: non archi- or other structural blocks; corrugated .>s or asphaltic siding materials; materials 3tion. e minimum net floor area requirements for e as follows: 500 square feet 700 square feet 850 square Feet 950 square Feet 1050 squore feet 1150 square feet. net floor area of a dwelling unit shall mean s a single dwelling unit, and shall be mea- ilding walls to the center of partitions on ng the dwelling unit being measured, but public entries, public foyers, public bal- hes, separate utility rooms, furnace areas the apartment, or garages. ly closet spoce having a minimum clear nches, shall be considered in determining The following minimum amounts of jvided for eoch dwelling unit: feet of closet space and 80 cubic feet neal feet closet space and 100 cubic leal feet of closet space and 120 cubic For each bedroom in excess of two in any lal 8 lineal feet of closet space and 20 ime shall be required. • 11 • I •ITM* ■ 1.* I r*i • i •!• li] f «•! •I I r» •liVlill*> M*! A* I f r* AVi nii r»• rtTi roii J111 riTi [•] i) i M J f [• •lJ>lliMf1ltI«H*lfTiHira*iniI*[•li > II ■MtTTtT* •HI*L* 11 •iiiir«riii«^ ■ 11 r«Ti4 i iT« ra rimi«KT«l IH iT«11 •i«i I mif r«iifi*MiilOII* • iM • 11:• Ir« I r«i [• 11 ■ •T^« M L* r^i f I* 11 ■ •liii r» riir*i •mrt •iifir*nir«i •]ifiiir« [•liMtlfllliniT^ ^ui» mi« 11 ■ r:^ miuu m nrii^ r«iir*Hr« inn a hard, all-weather, durable, dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained and landscaped and shall be maintained in a well-kept condition. No parking area shall occupy any required Propct yard area, nor shall it be located closer than five feet to a side or reor lot line, nor closer than ten feet to any principle building. Each parking space shall have a minimum width of 9 feet and a minimum depth of 20 feet exclusive of aisles and manuevering ;poce. All parking areas containing more than six spaces which adjoin either a public street or residentially zoned property shall have a solid wall or fence of not less than three feet nor more then four and one-half feet in height dong such adjoining line. Such fences or wallr shol! be designed that they are archi ­ tecturally harmonious with the principo! structures on the lot, A screen planting approved by the Council may be substituted for the required wall or fence. Guest parking stalls shall be easily accessible to or from the main entry of the multiple residence dwelling. No street parking shall be permitted. (m) Internal streets: All minor internal streets shall be owned and maintained by the owner of the Project, by a Homeowner's Association or by any other agency or method deemed appropriate by the City Council. Permanent ease­ ments 50 feet in width shall be provided as required by the Ci.y Council for all private streets. Collector streets which may be required to maintain neighborhood continuity of circulation between MPR Projects or with other adjoinin'^ development shall be provided with a public right-of-way. (n) Outside Storage: No boats, recreational vehicles over 20 feet in length, maintenance vehicles or other similar bulky objects shall be permitted on the site unless completely enclosed in a building or in an area completely en­ closed by a fence of such opacity and height to obscure the stored contents from any living or pedestnan areas on or around the Project site. Required garages or parking areas shall not be used for the storage of such objects or vehicles. (o) Landscaping: All open areas of the project or individual platted lots with­ in the project shall be graded to provide proper drainage, and except for areas used for parking, drives or storage, shall be landscaped with ticcs, shrubs or planted ground cover. The natural landscape shall be utilized where possible and reinforced with additional landscaping that is compatible with and comple ­ mentary to the various use areas and functions of the site, the structural addi ­ tions to the site, development on neighboring properties and the adjacent pub­ lic streets and highways. Landscape materials shall be of adequate size to contribute to the environmental quality at initial planting as well as at matur ­ ity. Generally new plant material shall be of the following sizes: deciduous overstory trees - 3 inch caliper; deciduous ornamental trees - 2 inch caliper; evergreen trees - 6 fool height; evergreen shrubs - 24 inch spread or height, dependent on form; deciduous shrubs - 3 feet height. Lawn areas other than natural landscape areas shall be sodded. -8- Such landscaping shall conform with the planting plan approved by the City Council at the time the building permit was issued. It shall be the owners* responsibility to see that this landscaping is maintained In an attractive and well-kept condition. All vacant lots, tracts or parcels shall also be proper ­ ly maintained. 3X.170 Application Review and Administrative Procedure 3X,171 General Procedure . The general procedure for application, review ond action on any Multiple Family Planned Residential Project shall be according to the following outline, with more detailed requirements found in the remainder of thissub division. Single family detached dwellings are excljuded from the review process. (a) Application, filing fee and six (6) copies of the Preliminary Plon are to filed with the Planning Commission through the Zoning Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to public hearing date. (b) Public hearings shall be held by the Planning Commission for all Projects. (c) Planning staff reviews Preliminory Plan and transmits copies of review to Planning Commission members. City Administrator, Pork Board, affected surrounding municipalities and other appropriate agencies and applicant at least five days before public hearing before Planning Commission. (d) Planning Commission holds public hearings on Preliminory Plon. (e) Planning Commission makes recommendations for action on Preliminory Plon. (f) City Council acts on Preliminary Plan . (g) Applicant submits Finol Plon within ninety (90) days of Preliminory Plan approval and fourteen (14) days prior to Firxil Plon review at Planning Commission meeting. (h) The Zoning Administrator transmits copies of the Final Plon to the Planning Commission, Park Board, Planning Staff, City Engineer, Building inspector and Fire Chief. (i) Planning Staff reviews Final Plan and makes recommendation to Planning Commission at least five (5) days before meeting. (j) Planning Commission reviews Finol Plon, recommends action to City Council. (k) If City Council approves Final Plon, Zoning Adminstrator changes the zoning classification on the Official Zoning Map, as required, and files the Final Plan for enforcement. -9- 3X.172 Application for an MPR Project shall be made by the owner of the property except O” option holder may apply provided his application is accompanied by a signed statement indicating no objections from the owner or owners of all properties involved in the application. 3X.173 Application for a Preliminary Plan shall be filed with the designated Admin­ istrative Official and shall be accompanied by six (6) copies of the following plans and information: (a) Location maps showing location within City and more specific location on a half section plat map showing all surrounding property lines within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the proposed plon. (b) Resource Component Analysis (RCA). The purpose of the RCA is to deter ­ mine specific design features of a Project that will minirnize the detrimental effect of development on the natural and man-made environment. Opfwr- tunities and constraints imposed by or on the site will be key considerations in the City's Project review procedures. (1) Natural Elements in the RCA shall include documentation and analysis of existing conditions and relationships and a projection of the effect the proposed development will have upon; Vegetation (forests and woodlands, wet lands, and grasslands); Geology and Soils (bearing capacity, erodibility, and permeability); Slopes and Topography (slope stability, landscope features, and development potential); Hydrologic Systems (surface and groundwater, vyetlands, flood plains, and obsortpion); Wildlife (natural habitat, variety, and preservation-protection), (2) Man-made Elements in the RCA include documentation and analysis of fhe factors that affect development either providing opportunities or con­ straints, including. Community Facilities (schools, parks and city services, such as fire and police protection, etc.); Utilities (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, electric trasmission lines, etc,); Circulation (vehicles and pedestrian); Surrounding Development (character, transitioiVTjuffers, orientation/access, scale/bulk, and building materials). (c) If platting of public streets or division of land are proposect all information required in the Subdivision Regulations for a Preliminary Plat. (d) General development plan with existing topography at two foot contour intervals indicating; (1) The proposed site and existing development on adjocent properties, (2) All types of uses proposed. 1 ■M -10- ef- (3) Proposed size, location and arrangement of buildings and preliminary architectural delineations including but not limited to schematic building plans and elevations. (4) Density or intensity of each type of use. (5) Parking areas and stall arrangement. (6) Entrance and exit drives. (7) Schematic landscaping showing tree massing, typical plant groupings, and screen plantings, etc. (8) Park and open space lands. (9) Dimensions, (10) Proposed schematic drainage and utility systems. (e) Summary sheet indicating: (1) Area of land in each use or each separate intensity of use. (2) Number of units proposed including number of bedrooms in each area in d*-3above. (3) Tabulation of parking facilities by type related to number and type of use served. (4) Number of acres and general intended use and ownership of open space. (5) Modifications of any provisions of this ordinance and any other ordinances codes, or regulations of the City of Orono. (f) Phasing Plan indicating geographical staging arxl approximate timing of the Plan or portions thereof. (g) Written statement by the applicant indicating how his proposed development conforms to the stated objectives and purpose of this ordinarx:e and the Orono Comprehensive Plon and why his proposal would be In the public interest. (h) Fee for filing an MPR Project application which includes ihe fees, if re ­ quired, for subdivision; newspaper publications of the public hearing; mailing of notices to owners within three hundred fifty (350) feet and staff reports shall be as determined by resolution of the City Courx:il and may be varied from time to time. -n- I il iin- 3X.174 Planning Ojmmission Study and Review of Pretiminory Plon (a) The Planning Commission shall make its recommendations to the City Council for Project approval; approval with conditions; or denial. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty (60) days of the intial hearing unless the applicant files a written request to the Planning Commission for delay. If the Planning Com mission does not make its recommendations within the specified time period and a delay has not been requested by the applicant, the City Council may take action on the request by the applicant. (b) The Planning Commission shall be responsible for evaluating the project in tenns of maintaining the desirable chorocter of the City, the neighbor­ hood and the site. The Planning Commission shall forward to the City Council its recommendations based upon evaluation of the following considerations: Relationship to the Resource Component Analysis: Are the features preserved, protected or enhanced; or are they diminished, destroyed or exploited? (2) Contribution to the existing desirable qualities of the neighborhood: Are the local factors of traffic movement, safety, convenience, appearance and general character strengthened? (3) Integration of the various site components: Are the locations and arrangements of the various development elements functionally and aesthetically related to each other as well os to the neighborhood setting? (4) Implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and specific Community Objectives: Does the project help correct a deficiency in the balance of community or neighborhood development? Does it integrate or provide a transition between otherwise incom ­ patible areas of existing or proposed development? Compatibility with characteristics of adjacent development: Are visual features, such os overall scale, bulk, height, building materials, landscaping, color, and open space in harmpney with each other and with surrounding development? Are essential but adverse building and site elements properly screened or obscured from neighboring property and public places? (c) A finding that any of the above does or does not exist shell not solely be cause for a project to be unacceptable, but further that It Is of such a -12- iili to i t ^ I j t nafure os to produce one or more of the following harmful effects on occu- pancy of the proposed development or on immediate or neighboring areas: (1) Adversely affects the benefits and desirability of occupancy; (2) Diminishes the stab-^>:’^ -^'d taxable value; (3) Prevents the most appropriate use of real estate and resources and the most appropriate development; (4) Produces degeneration of property; (5) Produces adverse conditions on the public health, safety and welfai 3X.175 The Planning Commission and City Council may from time to time amend or vary the application and review procedures and the amount and type of documents to be presented* 3X.176 Final Plan Review. (a) Before a Building Permit is issued for any structures within the proposed site. Final Plans of one or more stages in accordance with Building Permit requirements and requirements contained in this section, shall be submitted to the Planning Com' mission for review and recommendation and to the City Council for approval. (b) A Final Plan shall be submitted with an application for Finol Plan approvol within ninety (90) days after City Council approval of t. a Preliminary Plan unless a written request for an extension is submitted by the applicant. If an applica ­ tion for finol approval or a request for an extension is not received with ninety (90) days, the Preliminory Plan will be considered abandoned and a new applica ­ tion for a Preliminary Plan must be submitted following the Preliminory Plon pro­ cedure. There shall be maximum extensions of not more than one (1) year. (c) The application for Final Plan (or for any stages of the Final Plon) approval shall be occompanied by a legal description of the total property together with copies of the following plans and data: (1) Apian with locations of all structures including placement, size and type with existing topography showing two foot contour intervals or spot elevations on a one hundred (100) foot grid if such contours are over one over one hundred (100) feet apart. (2) Final architectural plans os required for building permit application. Plans for detached single family dwellings may be submitted directly to the Building Inspector for approval unless part of an MPR Project. -13- IT j-tm-nr.n.t. t (3) Elevations or sections through the site which wil' best indicate the relationship of the buildings with the various terrain features and site elements. (4) Grading and drainage plan at two foot contour interval or spot eleva ­ tions on a one hundred (100) foot grid if the two foot contours are over one hundred (100) feet apart. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Gjuncil and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for approval. Nopro}ectshall be permitted that results in water runoff causing flood/erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Such runoff may be re­ quired to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, stonn drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting woter runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or ordinances and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. (5) Utility plan for all public utilities and Indication of private utility service. (6) Landscape plan showing species and sizes of all plant materials. (7) Legal descriptions of proposed zoning district boundary changes (8) Deed restrictions, covenants, agreements, by-laws of proposed Homeowner's Association and other documents controlling the use of property, type of construction or development or the activities of future residents. (9) The procedures for approving and recording of final plais shall be following if the Finol Plon involves platting or division of land or the plotting of public streets. (10) Any other information which is necessary to fully represent the in­ tentions of the Preliminary Plan. (d) The Planning Commission shall review the Final Plan at its first regularly scheduled meeting which occurs at least fourteen (14) days after filing of the application for Final Plan approval. (e) The Final Plan shall be in substantial compliance with the opproved Pre- liminary Plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: -14- . i , ? . i J i S (1) The 'umber and locoHon of residenfial living units has not been changed (2) Open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original intended design or use. (3) All streets, utilities and other special conditions prescribed on the Prelim!nory Plon by the applicant or any of the reviewing bodies have been incorporated into the Finol Plan, 3X,177 If the Final Plan includes a zoning change, the Final Plan is attached to and is thereafter a part of the ordinance establishing the zoning change. The Zoning Administrator shall then change the zoning classification on the Official Zoning Map if a zoning change was mode and issue a Building Permit in conformance with the Finol Plan os approved. h -15- I niY or ''Rv NO, MINNliSJlTA RI-GULAR PLANNING CC^MISSION MliEHNC HELP MAY 3, 1976 The Orono Planning Ccnmission met on the above date with the fblloMing members present: Chaiman C. Paul Pesek. Menfcers Diane IXnlap, John Guthrie, Gregg Hannah, Goorge Hosficld, Gloria McDonald, Eugene Ifooley, Brad Van Nest and Zoning Administrator Henry Muluch. John Hake arriud it 7:4f> P.M. Chairman Pef^ek called to order the Pulilic Hearing on the imlication of the 315 East Grant Corporation for a aUbdivision of property located at 3340 Shoreline Prive, The Zoning Adninistrator read the Notice of Piililic Hearing and presented the Affidavit of I\d)lication. After discussion Van Nest moved, Dunlap seconded, that the division line should be moved to the 950 elevation rather than tlic division line in the lower elevations as shown on the proposal, staff was instruc­ ted to consult with the City Engineer to cfc'termine and correct ilf necessary the legal description of the comiKtrcially zoned district on this parcel so as to include onlv the higher elevations as conmercial. This would require rezoning. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Oiairsian Pesek called to order tlic Public Hearing on the mlication of John Lanbin for a Conditional Use Permit al 3340 Shoreline Drive to construct a Burger King. Tlje Zoning AdMnistrator read tlie Notice of Public Hearing and presented ti>e Affidavit of Publication. Gene Block im'sented a petition ©f 16 names of residents living on Bayview, Olive Avenue, and Navarre Lam who are against the Burger King restaurant due to tile possibility of litter, generating more traffic, and noise. moved. Hake seconded, to table the inattcr to give the J^)plicant additional time to confer with the cluirdi board in '.TMirds to the proposal of vacating a part of Navarre Lane and adding an approach to County Road #19 which would be located north of the existing power pole on tlie fmiit of the church. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Qiaixman Pesek called to order the lAiblic Hearing on tlic •pplication of Alan S/eetser for a Subdivision at R45 Old Male Lake Road. The Zoning Administrator read the .Notice of Milic Hearing and presented the Affidavit of liiblication. Hake moved, Guthrie seconded, to table the motion until appli­ cant submits revised proposal providing a 4 acre area for tlie ^parcel containing the two residences. .Jha Qiaixman called to order the Regular Meeting of the naiming Connission at 8:20 P.M. ATTENDANCl! - 7:30 P.M. nJBLIC HEARING - 7:30 P.M. 315 P.VSl’ GRMrr CORPOPATION 3340 SHORIJJNn DRIVE SUBDIVISION ftnlap moved, Hannah seconded, that the Minutes of the miliar Meeting of April 19, 1976 be approved as amen( Union, Ayes (9J - Nays (0). moved, Hake seconded, to approve the Keliv Avenue Holding Co. rezoning and subdivision with the stipulations that the garage on Lot 4 must not lie us«.d until a lesuleiko 1 \ PUBLIC HEJliNG - 7:45 P.M. BURQiP KING 3340 MIORnLLNE DRIVE cnNDrrm\L use PUBLIC HEARING - 8:15 P.M. ALAN .SWEETSER 845 OIJ) LONG LAKi ROAD SUBDIVISION CALL TO ORDER - 8:20 P.M. PLANKING CO^^^ISSI<^N MEETING APPROV AL OF MINUTCS MEETING OF APRIL 19. 1976 KELLY AVENUE HOLl ING CO. 2500 KELL'! AVlXfi .siiBPivisi'o; v:i) ^!::(T^;:^G 1 PCANNllfc C»MISS10N MlJiTlNG lU.LD HW 3» 19"<» PAQi 2 is built, that the house on Lot 3 must be used for single family residence only, and that the cottage on Lot 2 must be removed before a buildin>> ix^rinit is issued. The PRD request was tabled pending more information from the applicants. Hake moved, Dunlap seconded, to recomnend approval of 12” miniJiun diameter rock rip rap to avert '"urdicr erosion and protect tlie shoreline, subject to approval of other agencies. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays fO). Ikiilap moved. Hake seconded, to recomnend approval of l ip rap with 12” minimum diameter rock to avert further erosion and protect the shoreline, subject to approval of other agencies. Motion, Aves (9) - Nays (0). Van Nest moved, Dunlap seconded, to recommend approval of the lot area variance, subject to taxes being paid, ajul leaal combination of the three lots. Sewer is available, and adjacent properties are each built on 3 lots and tlicre is a hardship due to the unavailabilit>' of additional land. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Halce moved, Hosfield seconded, to reconmend apnroval of the lot size variance for a 4 foot addition to tlic existing residence. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Hake moved, Hannah seconded, to schedule a ’^^l»lic Hearing on this lot line rearrangement for the June H weiing. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Pesek moved, Dunlap seconded, to tabic the request hecause the applicant was not available for answering questions. Pasek withdrew motion. After more discussion Van Nest moved, Mooley seconded, to approve the 12” minimum diameter rock rip rap including necessary back filling behind the rip rap to prevent further erosion and danuige to the existing shoreline. The Conmission, however, specifically excludes any other land recontouring or filling. It was felt tliat the rip rapping was an emergency situation but that more infoimation was needed to make any recomnenilat ion on the remainder of the proposed work. Motion, A)-es (9) - Nays (0). IXmlap moved. Hake seccHided, to recommend approval of the variance. Hardship - no other location i>ossible due to rapid fall of land and removal of more trees. ''Intion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). POsek moved, Guthrie seconded, to recomnend approval of final plat i^ich conformed to the preliminarv plat as ^iproved, subject to the receipt of the park dedication fee and staff supervision of the drainage of the s»it» ject pn^rties. f-totion, Ayes (9) - Navs (01. IHILfP DYKSTRA 3080 :0 POIV: RDi\D PIP RAP (’£ORGF. JKNOS 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD RIP PAP VINO-NT jaiNSON 001 MINNirrONKA HiaiLANDS L' VARTANCK SI ELDON t.XJAST 235 CRESn/IkW A'.TiNUE VARIyVNCE AND ADDITION TO NONOO mPORMITY KEN HOPPk ETAL - 2608-261) MAPLERIDGE lANE LOT rdlARi’ANCEMLNT 1X)N lUOLV 2130 SllVDYlvOOn ROAD (ONDITIONAL USE AND RIP PAP DAVI; OPIEIM 1430 aiERJlY PLACE \'ARIANCE KENNiriH OIEN 2980 CASCO POINT ROAD Vim. piAT Aiwm / rU>friWr. a1^^^lsslON mhi :ting iihio k\\ v.\ : ? McDonald moved, Wooley seconded, to rccomcnu approval of the variance as tlie newly proposed location was an improve­ ment to the non-confoiming conditions existing from the location of the old garage. Hardship - narrowness of lot restricts any other location for the garagt' ajid the neighbor's approval has been received. Motion, Aves (9) - Nays (0). Wayne Peterson, 1359 Park Drive, appeared. (lutl’ric moved, Wooley seconded, to call a Public Hearing for the June 8 meeting, ftotion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0) Wooley moved, Hannah seconded, to approve front yard set­ back variance because the existing house ajid driveway loca­ tions conirined with site contours make the proiwsed location the logical choice. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded, to recommond approval for Conditicmal Use Permit to grade around the newly installed teimis court. It was determined a variance from tlie 2(>' marsh setback requiranent was not necessars as further investigations verified that t)ie grading ihd not encroadi this area. Motion, Ayes (9) - Nays (()) . Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded, to recommend ai)proval subject to City Engineer approving septic system; debris and dunp to be removed or graded in sucii a as to not infringe on :narsh area and to be supervised by City Staff. Hardship - no other land available to comhiiu- to increase the area of tlie existing substandard lot. 't,uion, Ayes (9) - Nays (0). Meeting adjourned at 10:35 P.M. L0RE>;Z K'JTZ 1462 PARK DRIVI. VARIANa JAMliS SI (WELL 1375 PARK DRIVi: SUHDrVISION I’AT V.TXLS 951 SPRING HILL ROAD VARIANCE .ARBOTT 1000 SOUTH liRdV'N ROAD VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PEI^IIT JAM!:*; HANSON 884 li.AKOfA AVIiSlfL CONIMTIONAL USE AND VARIAK'. ADJOl !RN»n:NT ♦ *««!M \ I K M ,f*'NAI<0 * i ‘ N I'O »-*»*' 1 NCiNMAN l Nf>^MAlL I AUMI S5 V. ACnMAN OllRAiO t MAG *4 U SON LDWARO M GtE <<NON Mt tV'N I. ORCN .’Ct.'J *:Cot Ni H H CAT I NO JAME5 ^ MART iNEAU RiCMARO J. riWoCRAcO f-Kil IP J ORTNUN SALISBURY ACAMS MACLA'I MfO* r OWARH J HARI- E « JOHN A. FOP Ht »T william f FOX JCRROtO f. bei^CFAi K WILLIAM I. OOL ^N W1 U L I A M C M O P T t N i. ‘ M I C W HWAM I 7 JOHN M. SThOT- ‘-.AN DAVIIJ G. NCWHALL ».• t N N i M A * *• ! S f N n.tPMS A i.i^ri NLI ' NC'Bt HI V .OM.'Ht OAViO L . A A Ac 3 K J O H N B . WI % ‘j ^ C N DAN iCL T ^ c AURAN sTF «.V».ac OOC»i THOMAS H. r.AARtTT l:l HAPR^C P. per III L)AR> It L . i> Pmu» F WAVNC A. SlVtn’SON DAVID J. OAv i riPOPI map A R. jOMf4-,Or4 PONAL D L WOl I I NS RICHARD A.PPiMUll* JEFFREY H SC H MIDI HPISTINF J S ! POM T I M O ’ Y H H l .» I L t P ROBERTO Ml I CHILL. JR DIANA t. MORPHY SfCVfN poman J. MICHAEL DAOY LINDQUIST 6t VENNUM 4^00 IPS center • eo SOU'^H B STREET MINNr.APOllS,MINNESOTA 5540P TELf‘^HOr^lK (61^) 3T5-e6SI L^zABt.i: address : linlaw WAVZATA OFFICE .VA./AIA MEDK AI R nt.DIMG 4f*>0 NOR1H CtNlHA AVENUE /AtA, MINNISOT A b 5 I V <f nay 12, IS’76 JU w- Mr. Hank Muhich P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Kelly Avenue; Property Dear Hank: I spoke this afternoon to Bruce Melkerson in connection with the Kelly Avenue property for which we are requesting the subdivision. Bruce told me that there was some question before the Planning Comniission as to whether IDS Realty had ever convened the property to us. Enclosea please find a copy of the deed conveyin<) the subject property to Kelly Avenue Holding Conipany. I trust this is sufficient evidence ol our ownership for the Planning Commission to proceed. Sincerely, t • # r • Daniel T. Lindsay \ DTLtdkb Enclosure Mr. Bruce Melkerson T p V -----i m 4 Z i j&tatr of itfuiiirsiota, I ICounty of Thv forc^oin^ instrutnent utis (uknottlrdiii 'l l>i-for< nif i thin............tiny of .......... r > ;r. l>u ................................. and by .......... of .............li\S rKt)?i:RTIi:S. LiC.. It .,'»?vaila...... ............... (N \MI IM III I i< I K *.'K M.l N I. I i t n III ni I I* I K • »K A».l N 11 (N ami- Hi I>i t ti I n <M.l n r. 11111 «»i i>i 11« i k • ik a(.» n ii I'N S ‘ II • M I < •* I * \ I II IN • K ■ • AV I I III.IN!.I ! I//. *'/ fn hftif « f (h» rnrion. (STMFOR 1*1 AC f Ol INM'KPOK flOM r.|i.*^\ll>! I f H\n I •. I I .• INV I I ?»C.MI Nil (Iin »; OR K \NK1 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY -------TK!s"i ' _• Ml fialkmol iw»k KVinnc^1ifrltt\rmma^ S5409 TAX STATEMENTS FOR REAL f'u:,.; .« DESCRIBED HEREIN SHALL LL L.Tfii. JO Name of Mig. Co. Mailing Address Name of Gran*'’e Mailing AcJdr'-ss , City Stall?Zlr 9k JL A gw tS W 2 A tu (3 r 5 J s , A _.»(^ .»«- V ; jii•; ^**r 1 1 1 *tr»*•,>.. ] j I W. ••• V.2: t..J •/ •.i..•»% •k. C • ^ - C. •• •i 1 t k «vt * ,i V o s.* ^ #5 ^ it ” ov> o c c: Ik c.: s- S 0 H i :_ - ^ 1. c > » W •:i H . •* i< ^ 0^ • ■< (iri)t£t 3nbcnturt, Mad^ma... httwten m mWU’.lXIJvS. INC. ... '•.) ■ day of }lz.y...................... 19.16.., a corporaiion under the laws of the State of............NevA>la ........ IvSLLY AViJnjI! IIOLDlUr, C(ytT.\..T, .1 p.irur.oiffiiip a corporation under the laws of the State of....... ■ Minnenota- party of the first part, and .... , party of the second part. tQltnCtftfCttlt That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of....i}n& ■iloWa'r............ • and-O-tlWI«-S00d...aaJ...Valuable COU0lierat.loa..fsrr.s-.n^.f:-r.<!S-..-r.r?irsr-rrTr.rr.-rr.?rrTr-'-Tr.-T.-I>0iI»^^5, to it in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt xvhereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Sell, and Convey unto the said party of the second part, Us successors and assigns. Forever, all the tract.....or parcel......of land lyin$ and. bein$ in the County of .....Ueraiapin.................... and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: Tract C, Rep.lstered Land Survey Ho. 1A2.’, riles of the ReRiatrar of Titles, honiicnln County, Kl.t.nc'?ota. Subject to: (1) Judicial Landnarlts set pursuant to ’iorreua Casu ”o. luOCb; (11) The rights of the public in the waters of the inau-naue cliannel or la^ooa which extends frora Lake ,lluuetonka across a portion of the above prenlscs, .is shox.n upon tlic plat of .survey on file in Torrens fasr. No. 16'^S6: and (ill) That certain Declaration In iavor of Sufier Vulu Stores, Ind., dated December 24:, 1075, filed Docuniber 31, 107.5 and recorded ns Doc’U.ient No. 1163719, Files of the Re.iilstrur of TlLles. (Co anb to I^OUl tijc ^aine. Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances (hereunto helon$in^, or tit anyivise appertaining, to the. said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, For- ever. And the said.......lDS-rropertiQ.v, Inc, ..................................................................................................... party of the first part, for itself and its successors, dors covenant with the. said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee of the lands and prenmes aforesavl, and has good tight to sell and convey the same in manner and form, uforesaid, and that the same are free from all incumbrances ^...axcept'-roal- u.'Stato-.tAro.'ii anJ liistallnit nta.. of...special..ftaE.fc*.Rsr..2jiLw ..and... Interest thereon due .iml payable lu 1977 end theroni L.v•r. State Deed Ta:: Duo licreon: (37A.OO And the above bargained and granted lands and premis'.s, in the, quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, its 'successors and as.<>igns, against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to incumbrances, if any, hereinbefore menlu.ncd, the said party of the first part will Warrant and Defend. 3lU vircrd(lHOnP Wllicrcof, The Slid first party has caused these presents to he e.vecuted in its ci rp ‘rate name by its .Vice president and Us Asst. Seunu tn y and it.- corporate seat to be hereunto a/}i,rrd the day and year fir.d abov written. f!IDS PpnPCKTIhSv IMC................... ... lit/. 4/-1 f\A Its... Vico......President W. R. Benson H. F. ^fuhich March 25, 1976 Man Sweetser - 845 Old Lotir Lake Road Subdivision (Preliminary) Mr. Sweetser is requesting a sid>division of his 9.46 acre parcel into three parcels all exceeding the ministnr zoning requirements of the area (2 acre and 140 ft, lot width. The survey indicates the acreage of parcels 1 and 3 ex­ cluding the road and wetlands. Parcel 2, however, notes total area including the road to be 2.7 acres. Die area of the road as shown on the survey does not exceed .3 of an acre. Therefore, the parcel would consist of more than the required two acres. We will have to review and discuss the following points regarding this pro­ posal . The status of the existing cottage. 1. This being zoned single family residential, the cottage cannot be used as a second residence. 2. Location of existing cottage does not meet setback requirement from the property line. 3. Existing bam would not meet 150 ft. setback requirement from newly proposed side lot line (Ord. Section 34.031). The applicant could consider a choice of variance request or alteration of proposed lot lines. PLANNING COWISSION MEETING - April 5, 1976 The Conmiisicn scheduled a ihiblic Hearing for the 3rd of May, 1976, at 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC in^ARlNG Mav 3, 1976 Mr. Sweetser presented his propos:!. Tiie Comnission had concerns alxut Lot 2 which would be approxim:itcly two .ic:es and would it:cludc two dwelling units and a bam. The matter was tabled to give the applicant time to redraw the |.>o^)osed lot lines to cither place the cottage cn . seT>arate lot from the main house or to increase Lot 2 t(^ 4 acres or norc. May 12, 1976 Enclosed is a copy of the revised subdivision r>ro])osal as suhnitted by 'Ir. Sweetser. MM) - ALAN SWEETSER - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - Page 2 PLANNING GOUfllSSION MEETING - May 17, 1976 The Planning Ccnmission recomnends approval of the preliminary subdivision proposal as all parcels consist of a minimum of 2 ;icres and the 2 existing dhfellings would each he located oa separate parcels. mMm. t 5 . W. R. Benson H. F. Miihich May 12, 1976 Joseph Jacobs - 420 Tiimliam Road /I Mr. Jacobs is requesting a Conditional Use Permit as required to keep horses and goats <»i his five acre parcel, lie is requesting variances for the number of animal units permitted and stal^lo setback from lot line. The maxinum per­ mitted animal units on five acres is three. His request of five horses and two goats requires a variance of three animl units. Ihe proposed location of the bam would also require a variance of 60 feet from the required ISO' setback from the west lot line. Tumham Road, \^hich is a 66' platted right of way, would provide adequate separation from the property across the street. Tlie proposed location does meet all otJier setback requirements. K A \ . .m I • •#*■.• ■‘' >■ v?‘ ^v/-. I \. ‘ '^'l v;-.r^'^v; T- - •• ' * t.V« • . '•V ;< . • ■ • ' ' h^l‘ ' ‘kt; 4. ’ I ^ *''•• ‘ " * .- .►vC'*'’'’ * »■ tho • T » rL.t of i:urvt*y . for 'Hsonios A. Thonpson ^/ft #% • Mk. .. V • V ^ . •r . *>: 1V -M i •m.' : •w ■ Y-\ ^' * . * • • • i -4 • ' t .A V M ' !. * J'i ’i: i**. 4* ;/4- . ■• ':-.V< c' **• <e *^ u: i-ue-23 •'t *-m 5 K i' i. 4 t' ■’ . ii '.r i ^5 5'*. I JJW \#122 '.’^tv '< VTr* '^ > ’’•-■V'/ ■: *.' • .•i . y I « # •. ’ < ^ vU:< . i-A -iV< ^ V 4^ # • U'^T - ^20* X t/c* V •■« • . u ' "vi . :f t'■ ■ wmi i t •8' ?: '. * •' ^ H /u>/ // '»» pf Cj ^f NF,Vf o* ■■•'' -'•■ ■'?■ * » i ./So. i. .*, .^v 4o * Cfn/er sec Jl'nt‘1^ i • vw 0 / /Vw* 14 // -f ^ 2S/a 3!T 4 yV#*»e. /oi Jet. ^------% • * f' \ t -4. S. * ♦ ;l: . ;• tT -fl j’ U. * • I * J/JLd. j /s ^ 4•• • .V' '* ' ■f'rV '■r ^ tM4 saf ^ *5 :;■• V.♦ . ♦ . i *:■ ■ r.i ' t': >. ' IK : ^ . A ' • ■# V ...K’ -,•. ,i{-. :‘f'.' . V-r' jr^r' ■ .<< i Oortiflcftto of S^®y* ir 1 true nml correct ropr-centation of c survey I hcrety ♦^oA/r«U t.vit part of tho Southvoot quarto|* of trio Worth- boundarlea of U)(tho West “j r°rre ?3 West of y.s SthT.-lne-p.l ^ cost quarter of section 31^^ <,^ariir.ro'f tho South i itartcun Boud) and ,(n) the dart fterldlen, lylnr -ou ,nn / r. at o*" ‘’■'t unrt oC tho Southwest quarter of the Ttorth- 317,4 feet of the ''”*5711.4 f<^o^ „.] nrth. ll-.nqe 23 West of tl.c 5th PriKlpal Z%r:Xi:. ^™th°:/iie «ntriv,e of the South W.te.rtevn Boad. It dqao port to shov inprovemonts or oncroacr.'nc'itv.. ^ j^l . yf '.-1 Scale! l‘» = 200» Ubto X 7-?7-73 o : Iron rvir'cor <i.')iv!on Ue Coffin Re^a Lnnd Surveyor t nd Marker ieonj. Uko, Mlm.caotji f‘ ,v PROPERTY OWNLKb LISI ^y-hi NAME (Piar (\}D. 413 ^/;^ l^filClIlO Q^e, ^ I. \lat\i fh- M^/i 0. HI ADDRESS 3 i Ti ji.AV 3 - ^dfi60hj [-7- : l\!V> • 10. Sl^rnDf*./ 4'.'-‘’7 f'fv /V' . #r» . L ' I l\ r» j/', .ti', / ‘ roX ..y- /' . >••/ i'4<' /.V/'': T\g ig.k D/Vi'c. DESCRIPTION I / # I > I /■’ • tl f' * • r: 9 4 » < I V >7*»’ (rkXT (\iO.-i ;i:5/ v0 ^nTfVK- • ^ • .’T T • «• » I V -0\ 6i (0 5 c^nAo^^hlT ?■ K • D^’mu (-/'f •A ;•;: ■■ r4- ■. ..■' «... a ■iCr-. • TTA'*' -- 4 . # ~4v’' ‘ii-Jlli.'.. •« *- ■ ^■ ■ mV* V 3 / j H.lAI Q i'-O'f 0. -i .w>% . * • LOT (./.JZ/IL/LlL • I % ' r • • *• \ •\ I <i’ S » tf * ' < • f I ■ I . ■■! I •r ). • -• * / i ', / . f ^ • I ♦ ! r/g'*- 4jf. t:*- ' ' * . . ‘• « / BLK. 4'* PARCE V • • ' , 4 - ’* > -•' -'i:■“;■•:> I ■i ,#-i« • i'i •7 -V4fe;4'| ^ •11' 'I ^ fife -.t. I' *.< *,•■’ I f f ♦ .f''i rt jt -I - 1 % / \ , V /* 't* 'h. 'H#:, ''v^v V fc •. •<? ■1 «<*.. »*/ ‘-V /A'- - f ■• 'T ‘ / • •. f V*^' vv t V. ..^ti ' I • t *> i < t W J l *'■ 'r,.'t‘ 'i:’. *:• '* TURNHAM_ROAD ; < >I ■ ,'v|^. ■^'Vl«i ' ■ ‘Vt, .'C --il '■ 4 •. * • 4 ' . .f'', * ' 4^-‘ ■ ‘V" • • ' ■ , - I ' ' * ■ m. I. l^ / • r “ 'i • ♦ tr, / / » 4 4 5 ♦ m.. / >. >i r a- 1; v' ■ ■ ' * ^ ^ • V#s ^ V • !• • ^4 \ • i I. T .1 r-?'i ' * <l’ - I-" •' i '^'< f' ■►v-i ' ■; -v- < '.'■‘‘•A-t; • 4 ’ .«■' J ^ # •’ # • *t si ^ I ‘ ... ’■■>v%' •, ^ .• <*•‘ ' *> - • " • J. *4 •. l‘.. <f. ft •n 4 * 5-: >r;L: •;vt i- / “3 /.'>v V- . • »- Sy ■ U • ■ *tH ’<»•-•> •>•* i V .->•**•• -.v •' i t ■4. > 4- - * ,% •' • I \ I • • • I« \ ■>K^' \ -• .« ! \ >1 3>’\ \ I Kf% * ••v< *.?•'••• 1*1 .5^ .. ■. X 'H ■ . : ' *> t A *•* - f*1 'A *. f .I'.'‘ ■ j • *• v». f. . • *./' •' ' 'f M.t >^ • * v»' i f 4 •.,•«• i» ' ' t 1 # M I • *• <» ' '■'V-. '-.'i, ■■ •' ' ^ ’ij! ffi ' Vi : “V !'** . ’ -* \’ i V •.I ;'V... -|S;:;.4,.' . * ■ • V ■ •i;-•.* . »' •' . I.' .#r' •*• . •;'5v : ■ •' •' ‘ '.,v: ■■ • >-r ’I ■ * * '■;■'• i-••*•■'i' -V ’ . ■>. vV ;r 4: vs.:; -' .' ift- ^ ' 4 ■> i^jt s . i : ■;i •;■<,■ ”r¥i*‘T' V I M v{v. r4 -' -'••T-k' '» r t A. ■'' V*.'. * ■ . o ^!m- ^ (■■ r /• I ‘ • •. ;V^ tV *>' ‘■■■4- V'^-' ■■ ' H ?• > ^ u >4» •U : jf / j ' i"tv;r * ay:^ 1. •; i ■» .•■> ■' I . V*!'.- .* TO: FROM: a/^TE: SUBJECT: #125 J . < * W. R. Bcjison H. F. Muhich ; ■•■'•V,. • .^ '.' ■■ i May 13, 1976 > Tcm Vickernan - 679 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Conditional Use Permit and Variance for grading and removaX of trees within 75’ lakoshore setback Mr. Yid.eman has cut down 11 trees exceeding 6" in diameter within the 75* lakeshore setback area. He is requesting approval of tiiis action, along with approval of some regrading to inprove existing erosion conditions. • I The natural bank along the lakeshore is extremely hi^.' Ihe natural slope • from the street to the top of the hill has been directing all the runoff toward a point which has created n hazardous runoff crater with damaging runoff results. He is proposing to erect a retaining wall near the top of the hill and regrade the clifflike situation to reduce the direct runoff into the lake. The area from which the trees have been ronoved is the ares from vhich he would obtain the fill to carry out his proposal. I believe wc could request a slight berm along the retaining wall and along the shoreline. This would help divert the runoff and provide somf: filtration of the runoff. Mr. Vickerman has also agreed to repli-’e the foilage removed with ly* to 2%** diameter birch trees and numerous 2' to 3* high evergreens. His prtposal includes an approach stairway to tiie lake. He informs me this would be constructed in such a manner so as not to add any hardcover toward the lake. jA % The applicant mist obtain approval of all other agencies also.% 9' • < ♦ \k\ I- *t. \ Cn-Y OF ORONO, Mlr«®SOIA Ocnditional Use and Variance j^lica UXKnW OF PROPOSAL (or property) Waraw . ^ y</ /A .-I ^ j^ //7 tegal Deecripticn y A aV ^ ______________ ttPHTJCAWr property was acquired//-/ - / - p ^ <c 1 - n J iTrn /ytdAjf /> LA -1/] Phune # ^ 7 ^>ddrB68_^ JT^-lkA. I4^^^ .. p K:,_____________ TYPE OP ICQUK?*®^ >><f Oonditional Use ___ Variance Wetlands Varianon Phme « Address Present Zoning a Present Use /^k’J Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Itequest Sepclfy Qtdinanoe Reguixonents FUR CXnCIAL USE ONLY Council action Date Appra/ad Denied Dqplain Revest Relative to Requirements Bctent of I'tan*^on£omity Hsrdshipe to Property J'A. X'Q . m I U i A fo jZ. a-l c-Lv-rx WET kkiAL NECESSARt FOR CGMPI£TE APPMCAHON (Mist be submitted 1 vneek prior to CSouncil Meeting) Application oonpleted Plat Map Section Surv^ (Sketch in proposal) 4. Abstractor's Certificate of Property Owners VJitliin 300 Ft. 5. $30.00 Fee SiJinaturo ■ -r*' * w: •^.*' • r* ■- *r - K. R. Benson ' ■ . H. F. Mihich #128 May 12, Boeye-Anderson-Vctla - 500 North Arm Drive The Andersens and Veda are prepared to purchase a small portion of the Boeye property (Lot 2) for access to the lake if the proposed subdivision (lot rearrangement) is approved. Tlic diannel on the m^rth end of North Ann separates this small portion from the nviin portion of tlie Boeye pro|jertv. This lot rearrangement proposal would provide each parcel with lakeshore on which they could add code conforming docks. (Accessory structures per­ mitted on parcels with principle stnictures.) This request is for preliminary approval only. Tl,e final hardshclls and milars will be submitted upon receipt of pnd iininary approval. A Park Dedication Fee would not lx? required here as tlierc would lie no increase in building sites. « Wc should schedule a Piiilic ’^‘aring on this sulidivision proposal. * *■ * •A i ^• • • • : 1 11 « ^ • mmmrnrn «?. ^€jm^ Un.LAlii. (»•OKfV.'O Pa to . 1 :1 .1 1 ' s! • /\ u 1 )i 1 <’ a 1 1 aa ,1 Street Loentioa of Pfij|»ert y: bOu North Ann (irive. Hound Lena! ')cscripi lor. of I’roi.oj iy: ittjchod Oi/iicr /^ul F. and Fae R. L:Qi;yo"^) i.-U3 i';o:'th A:-ii! Lirivo, Mound __________(. V. t m c j ■ ....................... ■ i' A .hi r;)' 4/2-1970 (nj.oac ) Type of Request:c ;'.oa 1 a y i 'A*i 1 ’ i aiu'.c Coiulitioii.il hsc R rinit >31 11 c r y--Suhf'j i'i S i t.1 . Auft r«M'a I r Oescr iptioii of Ucquost:___See .itl.iched Anderson and Mary V. Anderson I,;____A I:.1 c' 1 iZ 4^ By-’ /■/■■_________________________________ case dr-iv; i^.’iitach .i slxcicli <)ii'":Mor*or.i! ' *.tract ire si '*'(^XaTcT7 « . 1. 2. 3. 4. s • lot/iur t!io fi J o-.'inq: Iiulicntc WortJj > . i ;m.'u v i ctr; of aropos al structure Location on Lot ii.aui.ol r.* tii.n c L‘. Adjacent Streuet NLimos / ..iin>: i i fore.! i i tiis aria Loc.ntion s.’tb.acL aiui uj.'’ .of -idiai-.ai haiiniaf; Hir. i.inccs iictweon any jn'Ojaisoa s 11 a< !; . .m.l siniclui'.’S "ii .adjacc/jt proiicrty Exiiibit Submi ttoil :f'l llap or plat sJiou'inq tiio jironcriy ,i i i\:c to l ui » ail l.uiAs ,V)0' of *.ac boundaries or the proju'rly nfrocled i»y pi o;;o<l chann.e. la cpits) /Abstractors or a t to rnoy;; co r i i t* i i a t i on li^*. la** tiu aai'ies .u d -..hlross of tiic owners ol tiic lanl witliin 'ini' of tIu' uiaiiiilai i (>f i!ic or(a..,*iiy rc'iaestinq the chann.c or rozonin*! as r'loso it.u'u s lupaar oa i.ie ri‘Corn,> of tuO t/ounry Auditor of licnnepin County. Petition siioi/inn SOS of uroMorty .a.nur:; i.i.iii.n %'iu' favcriiif. r.izoniii'* or variance. Pot low lilt’ t d iiC ^1 t 1 I'oTI ‘ic. /iV L’i t uCiirono ioi'.y Inspection Pcpl.• AdP’inis tra tor r ,..ouncil |. • 1 ;nRiiicor ^lanniin; Comni. 7ounc 1 1 \pplicant uotafio.i i.-V Uoco!:ii;iCiida t ioas : LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Present Parcel: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 924, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Parcel to be Subdivided Therefrom: The East 30 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 924, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: It is requested that the above described parcel, including approximately 0.2 acres, be subdivided from the present parcel and joined to the adjacent parcel owned by these applicants (Tract "E" of R.L.S. No. 748). This application is filed with a companion application by Veda, Inc. to have subdivided and joined to its adjacent parcel, a parcel of approximately 0.6 acres. Reference is made to the attached map. This land is presently owned by Mr. and Mrs. Paul Boeye, whose residence is situated on the larger parcel consisting of Tracts B and C of R.L.S. No. 924. The 0.8 acre parcel is separated from the larger one by a channel extending from Lake Minnetonka. Mr. and Mrs. Bceye have agreed to divide and sell the small parcels to these applicants and Veda, Inc. as aforesaid. Both desire to purchase these parcels to provide access from their properties to Lake Minnetonka. These applicants and Veda, Inc. have agreed to erect a common dock approximately on the lot line between the two small parcels. No other construction is planned on these small parcels. The property is zoned 2 acre residential. VILLACI: O'- OR(VJ') h.'itnl I i‘.<‘ Ajip 1 1 c n t I oil Street Location of Pror-erry:_500 North Ann Drive, Round Lc«^-il ')cscripl ion of Pnooriy: See attached_____________ Owiio Cvio .'o. re-.*____ Da t o 500 North Arm Drive, Mound TA'Tdr.'.ss) 472-1970 -) Typo of necpicst;• c zon i n T 'L'l r 1 anr 0 Conditiona 1 Msc f’ermit Other X Snbil i I'i s i Oii Afm ro\',t 1 Description of Request: See attached .-r', ' ■ I r- } ■' . / ' y Cv-:-. (O’vner) Ploaso dr.'iv; or ^^tach a skclr.’n of nroposod strnctjirc 5ho'’inn tiic folloi/inq: 1. Indicate X'ortii »). n i meni on s of nioposc-fi structure 2. J^ocation o;. Lot . Pronor.el r.et!).icks 3. Adjacent Street Names '. Zonine ia forc'.* in iliis ar.*a 4. Location S'.;ti)ack .m<l u^c' ef adj.-u-eni eyi-.;?ine l)!ii.l 'in'^ 5. Distances between any proposed s t rm: turvvs and sljuctures on adjacent property Exhibit Submitted': ;lnp or plat siiowinq tlie proncriy affected ;md all lam's iNfiiiiir 30n' of the boundaries or tne property a f fee tod by firoposod cloanj'.e. (5 copies) Abstractors or attorneys ce j* t i f i ca t i on listing the names a;i 1 afldres--; of tiic ov/ners of the land witliin 3n'i' of the eouna-irir-s of t!ic nronerty requ-es tin«’^ the chanqe or rezoninq ns those nane-» a!)iiear on tUv? records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing 505; of nronerty oi.ie*)!; u’ithin '.oo* favoriiii' rezoiiin". or variance. kol lo\.'iny tc> lic tilled in l>v '"^"1 *P • i>,e Ciirono lof'.y Dale Inspection Dept.1 Administrator fcoujic i 1 pnRinoer Planniiu: Comm. Tounci1 \pplleant Notified i‘V Uecoumendn tions: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Present Parcel: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 924, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Parcel to be Subdivided Therefrom: That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 924, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, lying Easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence West along the North line of said Tract B a distance of 200 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left 110 degrees Lo the Southerly line of said Tract !3, and there ending, except the East 30 feet thereof. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: It is requested that the above described parcel, including approximately 0.6 acres, be subdivided from the present parcel and joined to the adjacent parcel owned by this applicant, Veda, Inc. The legal description of Veda's present parcel is attached. This application is filed with a companion application by David L. and Mary V. Anderson to have subdivided and joined to their adjacent parcel (Tract "E" cf R.L.S. No. 748) a parcel of approx­ imately 0.2 acres. Reference is made to the attached map. i? -i'rr This land is presently owned by Mr. and Mrs. Paul Boeye whose residence is situated on the larger parcel consisting of Tracts B and C of R.L.S. No. 924. The 0.8 acre parcel is separated from the larger one by a channel extending from Lake Minnetonka. Mr. and Mrs. Boeye have agreed to divide and sell the small parcels to Veda, Inc. and Mr. and Mrs. David L. Anderson as aforesaid. Both desire to purchase their parcels to provide access from their properties to Lake Minnetonka. Veda and Mr. and Mrs. Anderson have agreed to erect a common dock approx­ imately on the lot line between the two small parcels. No other construction is planned on these small parcels. The property is zoned 2 acre residential. \i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ADJACENT VEDA PROPERTY: That part of the West 1/2 of the NorLla-asL l/A of Section 6. Township of the West 1/2 of said Noitln-asL 1/'* a distance of 1I67.9H feet, thence due West 513.35 feet; thence Soini» 39“17'30” W.-st, 280.0> South 11"56'30" West., 345.23 feet; thence SouM.erly to the Southwest corner of the l-ast 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Northeast 1/4; thence Easterly along the South line of s<iid Nortluas . 1/4 to L c p »i.n o beginning; EXCEPT that part thercui di^set Ihiid as toiiovs: ♦ Beginning at a ,...inl in the Kasl line el' the W.-st 1/2 of the said Northeast 1/4 distant 904.98 fo.-t .'.'orth of the Southe.i.st t-orner oi the .-•est 1; of s--.id t.■ortht•;.•.t 1/4; th-.-ee .•.•orth .ilo.s;; the hast line of toe J/2 of said .-iortheast 1/4, a di.stan.e of 2hl foot; thence due l.e.st 513.J5 feet; thence South 39'*17’3(r Went. 2.Hil.05 feet; thence South II j6 30 West, 3A5.23 fei»t; thonce SouthcM ly 220 fet*l along a line which if extended would intersect the Soul corner of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of said Northeast 1/4; • h.-is .* Northeasterly to a point bearuig due South 233.4 feet from a point hearing; Nortli 85"05’ West, 270 feet from the point of beginning; tlionce due North 233.4 feet; tlu-.nce South 85®05' East, 270 feet to the point of beginning,. t4 “T“ 1 2 1.1 ) » ^ kL* 1 « i 4 ^ b j»Mn'% * •/ /W 5^ ^ li— fwjuri 1 XV ^ 11 MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55415 ■|)Y»'7-T ‘'3 7 nn ic* » V //^ o>s;:. ’ ■ ’ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME \j£XxlK _ikJC«______ D^lD. -X -VJiM.TOlfJl UXK*l\^l£W G?olF |4IVA jDV_D AVlS-- Eu- faJ.R. KlAs/Ag-RE; fiJ&UER -I___bBKJ^C £cia I. -W A. ADDRESS I ui/.r-. ~V3C.:3_. 1'' - C f-E •'• T ’ ‘ 9C*’-1. -iCi^....J *' • Aiv^'. ri‘‘ w V..>jr./..s,A 'i-1 KC<V'"' 0 .i■'• ■?T i , ^i"i f *-< f: .L^- ■Pf.vMO Kv#’. Av=kJ'v >-!. ■‘jv.V. »"> V ^ ^ - i-' p^xji- .6 RoE.y £ THflftAAX UOUl-\fc.KA^ l-LB...Te,AR^£^_J-R JR F. JO . BRVOEAU----- ^UU xL^BofLy-g^.- Aj - i;.* .r'\. T‘a:. A'' ‘• l aij rvAw - OtVtt •'■‘‘^' /Aivi-1 ’- ^^ / • *- '-i DESCRIPTION ( r\-A.i wo K"T K /\ '2>UtAlvA\ \ mR^ C PlM too. LoT^ I Lx/T^ 3 AuD ^ l_jo. S '^I., ^Uv '1 KloRTT VA AR1V\ il'S ( pLftT KJO AZ"!-O ') REG> L-fXsJRi 'IgRvE-"/ C PUiT KH). ■A'SO'lo') I E^Cs'—A R&C;. L^VOb S.U>R.\/l= ( ?1.AT NO A^wo") tract- d TRA^CT' IL. T^\lO LAK)D ^\oRvfl"jK (pcA\ hiO ^A t:^'>u A^ TRACT A. Tvo^cTS h- ll-, ^♦•.•lt•-•'i »•■ ■■r xrt\ ^ - _ -•• 4*^ t/*» J*I-, 1 * L.*. . •*« % A u * '• •' « ' * *»! ». cf * *T 3 % ; k '• »• * '.* \ • .. .V • < •» . t.r f i**n :f l.v • ' 4./' »r:, f - •• : »*___1__i_ 00 00 oo oo 00 oo uO * :i -m K. R. Benson II. F. 'fuhicli Miy 12, 1976 Charles Cox - ivy I’lace Final Plat Approval f ?!r. Cox has submitted the milars aiul hardshells for a))proval of final plat. Pv-c enclosed copies of both the preliminary and lurdshell for r<*view. Our 1976 tax records indicate the raw land value of the property to !)e §14,600» of which 10% would be assessed as a Park Dediration Fee. V- • . <■ 1 ■ ^ ■■y f. % rft% W4-: * ( CITY OF ORD^JC, MINNESOTA Oonditiorial Use and Variance Aivlicatijl lOC^ON OP PKSOBKL (or property) Address L4.. i Legal Description Date property was acquired^;APFUCANT WW:3' OWBR None - Phone # y 51 I J TiuaJ.'ta jEX.-=- ■ ^^ Weof pbquest Conditional Use Variance Wetlands Variance /!*A'^ca^ / / y '/yj^ Pha\e » >c»., V ihMsnt Zoning ~ // ? /•» .^a. Fee FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council action Date Present Use Ai y Approved Denied /^Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Iteyiest '^t,7j^________ ^<ipcitir oniuianoe naquixanents m, . -.,.:/ /' ■ , yz? ,^,’^/p ,-/' A/-mC.€<^6^ t,A Bqplain Request Relative to Itequiratents p . ✓/ jt/A Actant of Nan*-oonfQnBity y * ^i. . 7^/ c* /:y) il l r’t ^-y _ i £4)0^2.^ itJiA. (k) fU PuDpai.Ly ^ y. j i ikijA id ( /'. ^ yy -■»«“ METIERIAL NBCESSAFQf FOR )u?pSc^CW ^ (^tl8t be submitted 1 v®ek prior to Council fleeting)yuUi. 1. AppUcation ccnpleted 2. Plat Map Section 3. Surji^ ^Sketch in propoeml) 4» Abstractor's Certificate of Property Owners 5fithin -gw Ft. 5. $30.00 Foe Date y2^» V !^y / 9 uJ /' ^ ■ ...........-..............e...... y A i(J , /^ V^ * '/Jtf //( •>/ A /y/yyfy 47^’ /yJatcO-^. A^ ’■ ■ ..'i • i s _____ J ^ /j/-A j.^ Aw -At^ ^'-i 4 //Ai»rA^ Ay ^ ■»>. vX ii4‘ ... . > KV ■f •A;iyv:.»/- •4 • ':V'..•vV.-. t ^=WM M'A'. v:> rTr-k* R,i& ;'f .:. y'..A'. r • A* % » '/r .ANf?*f M , -:-^y .; %■ Mi.^ ■i.' -k ,i.i'a •5l; ./». ■ . %*’. 'M ULi »“*/ ^ ',•■1 .1 #127 yi ^ ^ i n '-Lsi • mr- r ?■ „v • ■•I’.-jt t! If. -.i /' ♦ • .‘•T* W. U, Hendon H. F. Muhich ^tay 13, 1976 > *« % . _ Miliiur Hollander - 34S Snrinp Hill Road Final Plat Approval r Mrs. Hollander has submitted the milars and hardsliclls for approval of the final plat. V enclosed copies of botli the preliminary and hardshell for review. • I *->7 Our 1976 tax records indicate llie raw land value of the property to be . $8100. Total area of original parcel is approximately four acres. Through calculation we would arrive at a Park Dedication Fee of less than the 400 minimum. Therefore, a total Park Indication Fee of $800 would be forthcoming before final approval. r*.‘ ' -r v»> ... ifi \ r W;'p: .V vv: - A-'' C; ^ .'V V- 4- „ :V-i-‘n f Mii V ■ ’ 'f-v- ]'■ if".'? •V 4 i f •. • -i. ’ '*■y 4 , •* *• • ■ ' ' l} > *•’' '■, »* 1 '• ♦ » •- A- fc > > I >» \ Jir* • .%r'- ' V' ■ ■ . ■ ■ vf‘^- ' 4 ♦V Tv 1 • >> ! r'. . '.-V. # V ‘w < K <• r* • r. . H , . rt- ■■t 1.; , » * i S’ 1. w- .» * (s %l t * il 1 ■ •^l %' -l&lr ^ ^“v - 'I#-•.• ■''' 1^:'; t i ■ • •? ‘*r^ V’ ,t . V s , j • M'i %1 h>‘;-n»? ■?:.'; 1 .)%‘‘l' •• ' .v'* * - J , *" ; *• t '-H*,'';, ■ V>'** ’ a. ’.r'-/ ■ ; >5.' v.«- 1 /n* ''. ■» ‘V- . :4?r •iJ;."-'' •I2:'i:- « V % . ?}?■». 1 *4 A PilV It" ''%p..-. ' ;-T'^- ■',differ' Ai» Pljit c: ll vry ty foi Krs, For V.. Moll^intier i; U.j ©arjt 1/4 oi* f^aoticn 't. •O 1 1^^/ /n^ ©/S£ '/•«- \cf S^t/tpft 2f ‘t/e-Ji^ #84 Drn'pwa^ 9ftirr,,t^ f» ^'T I J 2 acres 'C* "t- ' / Pt0^S0d house Z a .tus ’V r • ’ »i ■/ f /*<^*^ c. /"V-. .• • «»9 / , f « i Gartiflcate of Survey: 2 herefegr certify that thie Ir a trv.i- nnd correct >•«» rueertatlon of a etirvoy of the boundaries of that part of the Kortjiw**«t tj\tfirt>*r of the Southwabt Quarter end of GoTemMSnt Ix>t 4, Section 7.^, Tcwiiahir IIP, ItonKc 2?, lylnf' Ncith cf the Forth line of Ttect A, ileglstered Land Sm ve; iio. i2ai, fllea of Rofititrar cf Tliloe, CoiBity of ffernepin, and lying Sojth of a Lina d«Merited as beginning t»t the Sottth<»<v wst corner of said Section 2^; iiionoe North alcng the <lest line th»r»)or, l'>*»0,0 * feet; thence Saeterly doflectlnj' to the right a distance of 22^9,7 feet; a tMno9 dsfl^ctilng to th^ rl^^t along a 2^ curve (dolta anglii 28^35" t and tangon^ 4 distance 729*8 feet) a distance of foot* thenf.'o Southoneterly, »* to ci^e a distance of 25?.(' Tuet; U unce deflecting to the lefi along a 1^30* oorre (delta angle 14^3P ‘, and tangent distance 49(\5 foot) a distence of 975.5 thence Southeasterly, tangent t<> an id last f?<n>crifed eurvOf a diatanoa of „ 938*5 feat; thence deflecting to the left along n 3^30' curve (delta angle 34®50' *i and tangent distance 513.6 feet) to Interacotlon with the Kaal line of said ^ Section 25, and '^are ending. It coos not pi:i*|x*rt U. snow iBtprovenr.nts or eri>* cr®sehncnte, but does Indicate th« prcoraacF Inciition of a proposec, nouae. * Scale; !*• ■= 100» Date ; P-f-75 o ; Iron.marker Tjordon it. Coffin Rftr. Mr, »/)64 lard .‘lurveyor and 1 i-ancfr ' ong l^k j, 9 i/. V I . • /V- y S' r' REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ' ' ■ r L.-• ■*•••»♦ 4* %fe*’ ‘ ll \r’> « ft/ A* '-‘ii *• * . * '’*'*< • ;. • ♦ *»t, .'/M«i - V ■... : • 1 »I ' ' cppy S'/o^ Bpokd, i < f • -.* t. ^ '• ^ »o •. >•.« v<: •\ I «» fP¥pfMfpp^si^ 9PPff0m M pf i f. -f . ^^^.• /4* <> Ji '• n jMift . . 4 tv \v \ 1 I % t. ♦•‘s R.I, S. Mp. Mi .■' f . i’ • *> '.'/..iAV V, ihrihpA^ //HR pf TAppi Af H.LS. Ni. Mi -u r •t iT#j/ ‘v- - ■:--K -f"' .-1 ' V P !'■■'■■" '■itMirMM [0RfW : ■ Mpn4<iM N‘ ,v- rA*! ' ,v - • V‘ : t ‘ . */ r. >.-f,v Ifitiiai’: iP r '■ \ v.y K i'a ■* «r s'Vl M Mitli;^^' 9f«fl»loM of OMptor 506, NlMUMtA tsss -s'•f 190 —. ■ ■ II $ p t® iiHf 4«irt«r ®f ili® Sovth®«ft ®wrtor '•ntf of Qwo wwit liH 4»> fMltoi 85^ IboMbif VUp of 1^0 A» %g&oteod Load tevoy Wo* 12C1, fUoo of Migiiitliii^ iififlUii* OoMtr ®f ‘ . mi6 fOcUtovoi iMd iwoojt oad Soutliorly of o Uao 4oipiHM( %oglaid«t oi.Uo * eo 25| ihmtrn NMi olflUf tho UOot Xiao tlMfoef . 1751^0 iboiM tkM ImM/* 9J^15* o dlotofico of 2S|09;9 fiot; tlwo co doflootlag to tho ^rooi C, oMi a^d Uao tkm ondliii|i ood that tlio aanroy olwoi fcartf lo • oarraot daliaaa yXdatad tlda^g^<g day of ^jg>pif/ , 1776. ' >/ • .-\t' ■Srtr'■ ■»,’-s- ;• 4', V «r. atratioa lo* 60ti Suroty mo aoprorod and aooaptad tgr tba city Covmoil of th« City of Orooo, KianoaoU, at a roof hold thia day of . 1976. CITT COOKCIL OF THl 'm 0^ OWOO, MTS’»f«Sf TA % ■; - ns. - > crrv OP ORDMO, MlltJ Oonditlolua Use and Variance Applical ter proper^) ^ . ; 'O' / nt>E CF lean i- ^Legal Deecription Sc\Jc^ 1 v Date property was acquired /6/ mucMir Haa e S<Wv. t; T^Ui /■;v - ^ tx. I*'- |v ;f Phone # (~^1- (•.<:• / ^ ‘ iMtoae MMW.C oncR H*. .-Cy^-T* tL'ft\:(.'».i;ri T C '*h i IL K , (« »V' t') tz: ‘ —Phone # Mdraas 4f PXMcnt Zoning A/;-f Present Use * ^Zoning Ordinance Section Relating Sepcify Ordinance Raguirements « /> . 4"^ Oonditicnal Use Variance Wetlands variance Fee X/^> FOR OCFIdAL USE < Council action Date Approved Denied i - fiqplain Request Relative to Raguirenents k ‘-----rr------------ I 4. ^ w ^ /X* -1 . / ■ - /• r / imm i m. i i — /tr .( .}c ' > V. 4^ &ctent of I'Jcn^xxifonnity i ^ t*%v ProM /4 rty X [ -i- V./• / • /■■ t •/ .y ’L.tV 'J 4-^ > f I 'V yi :t ' ^ y/ > ? MBDBRIAL NEX3ESSAFar FOR C^PUETTE APPLICATION (Mist be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1 • Application oonpleted 2. Plat Map Section Survey / Qisumbb. jjiUiUi^dOOrgtr 5. $3D.09 Fee / /•< 4 / / // PrtB r 5~- 7^Signature /V .4 .f ‘ i , , ( *■V ' » V Sff' •!' ij.' [) t"* f ■V V.-4.;,v.ir ■V '5 1- If/ 4 ■'p /■ *r* r •> :* i / •7 ^ ’■■'%. n>- .1 *• r u i. < ^ .1 ■ * •• ' V ’i- fH t\’.^ ♦• '.Ti' %V-.• •u • * •*> . N * 4 •i . ^ ^ v^-»’ •-^<'.£*•.■' • ••••ili- -i • ImhE-:*r* \-f 9 >.•y.~ V. ^ 'A ;Sivir-, : i-..' -"j ?v' ■••■‘x'« •.■• ;'i=^14:: 5 V ^■ I #129 r * ».• i cm OF QRCWO, MIMNESOER Ocnlitianal Use cind Vciriauioe A>3plication V* 0 e LOCMItN GF PROPOSAL •’ • r • AddTBM y J C DBeeriptioi T/Icr / /4x,.; V. ■ V4/ a/« //o APSUCAur lIiBte property ecquired__ c;,//^X Z:V// / 3di^d OA^<^d pt______ . , /W -> Phone » y ?/ ; y y >»- Oonditional Use \^u:ianoe Wetlands Variant ‘Pee X . A V V ' Phene « MSceas • ^ ■-vy;P»Ment ZGnin?iL//^Present Use toning Oedinanos Section Relating iipoify Oedinanoe ReguixenEients •r. j'-w > ■fu FDR OmCIAL USB ( Oouncll action Data ur Approved Denjied »q?laln Request Relative to Requirements t> S /0-/N/ J <_V * /W/’ rr. dC'^JlAr^ . Bctent of Ncn-oon£bmlty^ 7///S MONfJ- L^iP ^Kdehipe to Property Iu L(<■ t *.i • I COM/'lAiLd £i^C'i>/* /.^ A/r.T <^tLty' l /*.\X(/ UA y [<:. 7v- ■ w V :^^bD^rlCAL MBCESSART FDR CCMPUSTTB AFPUCAdlOW CMOet be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeti Survey ISketch in proposal) Otte %i * signature V ' (2) ' _./' V /• *i '** ‘ #» < ?r/.‘v: .<y Sjl •iir vSS "t. .V'< N ^»*. -%J • » .VI I *• 1^ fl' •0.XH %«• .1 I ^ :,-<jk' A ¥ 4*: >» * r- # k ' . . je r, .0 . v" V r*w 'ZSc^ ■'^, ?:J T \‘^ V v»**» • r •' V- • H- 4 ‘ m •■k-t.i * 1 >« .V • • < * # IB 0 « »• fe" :j1 . K • itf # T s »' *- * Si ^ K>. ^9 * ,. * . .*-4 ■ ; ■-.-.Tj 4-V'-' ■, ,V ■' ^ N /i V *vvV .V • V‘ t: V . ■ ■ ;;>r’;':’i ; •^•.:r ;.: -i V ■<-)y ¥ /^•,yr M V 1 V / /■ ^ I /■^•■^■'W > i/ p /■a’ /M •:r •*rii t ! :-fe.;‘ 'r-^./ .r * ■ ■t, s‘ • .' ?:■■; - 'r> A vS-' l.i** ---..-i;. , X /? y ,,o /- 1.-^ » o'* ••• 0^ V.... I-' •■' " _-...v. A"’ ^ ^ 30 / ■ ’•• h. :*• • *-■*• 1 . % % : ' * ’ si : .*5 •- ,^.V. ■ 1 •' ' ^m i.4‘^ * ; 'ill » ^ . #1 O /Hi«_>< U fK a '■.• % ip^v ^ • , * ■■ ^ %■Mi ’V %■: 4 • -' ■ ■>!i ***^'****-*‘^***^~*^* ■*• -- . . ----------------». - ^ ------------- - , - . _ .*AftM.il ' .kvr<m«bc^nr-k 1 ^ I Ok Aa «~Vtaa*Mv^■ P5.. : -K <: '' -1 -fc; cm OF aoNO, ni »___ Oonditional Use and VSarianoe Applies 1 ,*! ! -• ^ f # C I 1 (or pEqperty) d <Lwm: 'A •• '• ■ APIL TiPBOP mjOBBS ___ CbnditlGnal Uie X VSulanoe Date pfoperty was acjpiiTed^y^'y* *7? I > A « Js> ^ ____ Vtetlanda Varianoa ^ Pas / 'Td ^ /r; u. ;OMBt > •.Phene « P3D ■a.-''- «' ■ Zoning M-/A Present Use . Zoning CMinanoa Section Relating to Request FOR OFTICIAL USE Council action Date .• C*[Y Approved Denied '\'SapeiZy Ododinanoe Reqpiixements ^ /t-A fj •' <■Bqplain Request Relative to Requirenents ^ rr\—> 7^. A «... Setaant of Nan-can£c98mLty -rf-.r-9 * • i!.. Wmdstlips to Property IL VI-^r e^-0» W *-• -w7 ■’ « * r* ‘ ♦ .'* M^usk IAL ICCESSARy FOR OQFfflETE AFPLIGAHOI (Mist be submitted 1 week prior bo Council rfeeting) ' 1. Applioation oonpleted <Z« Plat Map Section Survey (Sketch in proposal) Abstractor's Certificate of l^coperty exmers VJithin Zi^Ft. no paa iPb5. $30.00 Fee DM*a? ,!9 7^:Signature </«> /* ’ V LESTER B. RASKOB Conlractcr ‘I'T 14816 Co. Rd. No. 6 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 5543B iij BUILDING AND REMODELING I I I . ^ .•.Cv-- I * • 4 i-v A »' I ' V . ¥"-‘ % >< . 1 ■ -’•■V z ■ *• JU 4 :«v ’ -?♦ \-/Wv • • • i »• i « ■ f' . ‘,*r ’■ • • '.r # ;■• I , » I " r* *. .4 / * ‘ ‘ V. fy. . * '4.‘. •* * . • W lUroh IV^ 1976 • ^ a • Mvlalon of PlnAri^a Audltor'a He-^t '^fr'Banne Cc# Crvariinant Ctr'.t?r v:>U.f. •4.300 Sovth 6th St. ?* :v 'llplio» MN. SUmi Sneles^ 5 s a ch#sk for *^inlKu»u fa# for wMeb *• vonld ilka a liat to coaply vlth tba natarial ntaasaaiy for a variance sprite*t5one The propart^r la aa followa oi. toe Wx atatenienti Dla. 36 Flat haoil Parcel !>ij A) Sco ^.iat 276 V/S 3 Mdltlon Matt# Sae/bot Tep/Uk Ohippava 2nd Addri 1 1 Va are daaling with Orono village and Uia lias ve naad fraa your offioa la called *Abairactor'a Cariifleata of Fropartj Ovtiare ^rithin 150 fte* Ver/ truljr yoira KCOe Lester Be Raakoh iu8l6 Countor Rd. 6 Pl/moutbf MOe 55iilil Jli Oit 1 o (C T‘ * . ■'t A T% I I 11^ I — ret 11*^1 >. > «( t ^ \j% O Ci 1>” V ■ ’/ ii &' 4. ; ^ • m. ■ f fy’ : ? • / S 1 /'r & / VO o.• I f'. C* /^ 7 f;