Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-20-2023 Planning Commission Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE 6/3 0 %0 3 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION PARK COMMISSION OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request Please complete the following information for City Records Name (please print) Address Present for (from agenda) Name or Number 1. to-g S'i 6. I `/'fc-N" `v". jit Go i ,i�-�,•�l itqce.4-10 /'3 6 kit,t112`444f) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the Agenda items is available on the City website (www.oronomn.gov) under Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet — located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Mayor Dennis Walsh Pledge of Allegiance Oath Of Office: Ted Schultze Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: May 15, 2023 Public Hearings: 1. LA22-000064 Lebrisia Iversen, 4448 North Shore Drive, requests variances for average lakeshore setback, 75' lakeshore setback, hardcover to exceed 25%, hardcover within the 75 -foot setback and side yard setback. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 2. LA23-000022 Michael Clark, 565 Leaf Street, requests a variance for the placement of a new accessory building streetward of the principal building. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 3. LA23-000023 Bob Renaud with Minnesota Green, 1856 Shadywood Road, requests a 75' lake setback variance. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 4. LA23-000024 Sarah & Kevin Revering, 1960 Fox Ridge Road, request a front yard setback variance for an addition. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA23-000025 Revision LLC, 165 Cristofori Circle, requests variances to permit an oversized accessory building on the property streetward of the principal building. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. LA23-000028 Loren and Julia Parks, 350 Crestview Avenue, requests lot area, front yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, and 75 -foot creek setback variances, as well as a variance for hardcover within the 75 -foot creek setback in order to redevelop the property. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Other Items: Update on June 12, 2023 City Council meeting. Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to July 10, 2023 City Council meeting: Scott Kirchner Sign up for email notifications at www.oronomn.gov — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Mark McCutcheon, Dennis Libby, Jon Ressler, Bob Erickson, Scott Kirchner and Gary Kraemer. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Natalie Nye. Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2023 Kirchner moved, Ressler seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of April 17, 2023. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. OLD BUSINESS 1. LA23-000017 MURPHY & CO. DESIGN, 746 TONKAWA ROAD, VARIANCES FOR HARDCOVER, DRIVEWAY WIDTH, AND REAR YARD SETBACK City Planner Nye said this item was tabled from the April 17 Planning Commission Meeting. The applicant wishes to build a new three -car garage near the street and demolish the existing garage which is non -conforming and served by a steep driveway. The proposed garage is 10 feet from the rear or street property line where 30 is required. Due to the proximity of the garage to the street, the driveway does not have the opportunity to taper down to the 20 -foot maximum width, she said, so the applicant is requesting a variance from the rear yard setback and also for driveway with to allow a 34 -foot wide driveway. The applicant is also requesting a variance to hardcover. The project would reduce hardcover from 35 to 32 percent but will still be over 25 percent so it requires a variance. The original plan removed a small portion of the shared driveway, Nye said, but the revised application restores the shared driveway to its original design. The neighbors are in favor of the new design. Dan Demeules with Murphy and CO Design, 235 Lake St. East, Wayzata, spoke as the applicant, explaining they met with the homeowner to the north and agreed to keeping the existing paving line for the shared driveway. The plan also removes a stair that used to be on the side to provide outside access and the owners will now be using a stair inside their garage to get to their lower level. Bollis said he remembers the Planning Commission were mostly in favor of this request at the last meeting except for the issue of the shared driveway. Kraemer said he was in favor before but it's good to get the neighbors on board and that there had been good communication by everyone. He called the revised plan a no-brainer. Kirchner said it looks like the difficulty from the previous meeting had been resolved and he had no issues with supporting the request. Page 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000017 Murphy & CO. Design, 746 Tonkawa Road, Variances for Hardcover, Driveway Width, and Rear Yard Setback as presented. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. LA23-000011 MATTHEW AND SUSANNE JOHNSON, 1015 WILDHURST TRAIL, SUBDIVISION/PRELIMINARY PLAT City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating it is a 9.29 acre parcel near Saga Hill Park Preserve. A recent administrative boundary line adjustment moved the eastern property line to west. The proposal is for two lots where half acres is the density guide. An outlot would serve as access to both properties with a private shared drive off of Wildhurst Trail. The property would be served by City sewer and private wells. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has said this proposal as a two -lot design does not trigger their stormwater rules. Hennepin County has reviewed and did not have any comments. Access to both properties would be through an outlot so an easement and maintenance agreement for the shared private drive should be required. No public comments have been received. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. Curtis noted the applicant is present. Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, the abutting property, said he is the applicant. There is a purchaser for the north property, lot one, and he is purchasing lot two. He said the plan is about half the density that is allowable there, but they were trying to keep the lots bigger. The sewer line will come down the outlot. According to Johnson, lot one had an existing house on the southeast corner and it is the intension of the buyer to build in the same area. There are no development plans for lot two at this time, so no pad location is indicated. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. Barbara Schmidt, 50 Landmark Drive, said over the weekend she downloaded the agenda and this item was not under public hearings so it was misleading and neighbors did not get proper notice that it would be a public hearing. Curtis said the legal notice in the newspaper and the web site was correct. Oakden said it was her understanding that the item was linked to the PDF and available on the website so the information was published. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. The Commissioners discussed the item. Libby said he thought this was a very comprehensive review and he supports that in Orono applicants can come in with a sketch plan in the early stages. He said he did not see any reason to delay as he is very familiar with precedent in such cases and this was done thoroughly and transparently. Ressler said the packet had a great deal of information with comprehensive research and everything in the packet makes sense. He said he can't think of anything that would allow him to reject or deny the preliminary plat application as it is well though -out. Page 2 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Bollis said it is a conforming subdivision so he doesn't see any reason not to support it. Whether or not there was proper legal notice is a matter for staff and the attorney, he said, adding that the Planning Commission can only vote on the plan it sees in front of it. Erickson said the plan not only complies with but exceeds the minimum standards for lot size. He said it's an excellent plan in a neighborhood where there are larger parcels to the west and smaller to the east. These are in-between size so a good transition that fits the character to neighborhood, he said. Libby moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000011 Matthew and Susanne Johnson, 1015 Wildhurst Trail, Subdivision/Preliminary Plat. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000020 JAMIE GRANT, 3020 CASCO POINT ROAD, REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM LAKE AND FRONT YARD SETBACKS. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is requesting a variance from average lakeshore setback to expand the deck on the lake side of the home. Currently the home has a non- conforming deck and the owners would like to expand the deck to make it more usable and functional. The deck is proposed to be expanded by approximately 205 square feet and will be about seven feet closer to the lake. The deck meets all other setbacks including the 75 foot setback and is within hardcover. It is positioned in such a way that it does not impact lake views for the neighbors, Nye said. There is a dense row of evergreens between the deck and the north neighbor. Staff is in agreement and Nye said they have recommended approval in the past when the proposal does not disrupt the view of neighbors and is not within the 75 -foot setback. No public comment was received. Alex Grant, 3020 Casco Point Road, said the family just wants to extend the deck to have more space. She said large trees keep their deck from the view of neighbors. The existing patio underneath the deck needs to be replaced but expansion of the deck would give more protection. She added, her father is often in a wheelchair and the expansion would help with his mobility issues. They have the approval of both neighbors. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Ressler noted the neighborhood goes out to a lagoon rather than the full -on lake and the neighbors are not opposed. For those reasons and with staff support, he would support the application. McCutcheon said the intent of the ordinance is to protect the view of lake for the neighbors. The deck is not within setback, the neighbors are in support and the plan does not take down any existing trees. He said the intent of ordinance is there and this is not a big ask. Kirchner mentioned the trees in between the properties are massive. Kraemer moved, Kirchner seconded, to approve LA23-000020 Jamie Grant, 3020 Casco Point Road, Variance from Lake and Front Yard Setbacks. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. Page 3 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. 4. LA23-000021 HOME REFLECTIONS, 2691 ETHEL AVENUE, AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the existing property is entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. The neighboring home at 2697 Ethel is a flag lot with a 15-foor lane connecting it to the lake. The flag setback significantly impacts buildable area on the applicant's property, she said. They are proposing to expand the deck on the lake side of the home and square it off and add a staircase. They also propose to raise a portion of the roof slightly to increase the symmetry of the roofline and construct a new entry with a covered roof entry porch. The additions to the home have been designed to improve the aesthetic of the home and update it while minimizing the impact to the adjacent properties and their views of lake, she said. Staff agrees the location of the neighboring home creates an unreasonably severe setback. The roof expansion is minor and should not affect the lakeview of the neighbors, she added. The front porch is on the street side and should also not negatively impact the neighbors. The reconstructed deck would be no closer to the lake than the existing. However, no improvements can be constructed to the home without variances. Staff recommends approval. Teresa Elsbernd, president of Home Reflections, the remodeler on the project, said the applicants bought the home just before Thanksgiving and were not aware at the time that it was a non -conforming house. A variance was granted in 1993 so an old house could be torn down and a new house built on approximately the same location. She said as the remodeler she was surprised to find it has this severe setback situation because of the flag -shaped neighboring lot although the flag portion along the south side is unbuildable. She thought it made for a strange way to determine average setback. She said they were applying for a variance to do modest work on the exterior of the house. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. Luann Runkle, 2684 Casco Point Rd., said they have been in their home since 1981, and are the neighbor on the north and west side. She said she wanted to comment on the existing LMCD variance order in 1994 affecting the four homes in that location. The LMCD order has stood for 29 years and states that this property could have a dock and the two neighbors had to share it. She indicated the new owners had spoken of plans to add a boat canopy and a big boat and they need to be aware of all setbacks and dock size requirements of the LMCD order. Relating to the current application, she called it an encroachment of the deck on the north side and said it would kind of hang right over their property. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. The Commissioners discussed the item. Bollis said it is virtually impossible for a house on this lot to comply with a setback for the house that is behind it. He said he can see the practical difficulty and doesn't think the exterior changes are egregious or beyond what is normal for that existing house. Kirchner also said the practical difficulties have been well-established and he is generally in support. Ressler said the City had tried to find a way to clean this up and make it one size fits all and it's virtually impossible when it comes to lakeshore and flag lots so that is why there are variances. He said he tends to agree with the developer that it is a strange way to define average setback but the City had to come up with a way that meets most situations. Page 4 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000021 Home Reflections, 2691 Ethel Avenue, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS — Update on MAY 8, 2023 City Council Meeting Oakden updated the Commissioners on the May 8 City Council meeting noting that the City Council did approve the seven or eight applications the Planning Commission saw at its last meeting and recommended for approval. The one change was on LA23-000019, the council approved the application but change the sidewalk addition to pervious pavers. ADJOURNMENT Libby moved, Erickson seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m. ATTEST: Christopher Bollis, Chair Page 5 of 5 Date Application Received: 12/2/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/31/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/30/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: June 20, 2023 Subject: #LA22-000064, Lebrisia Iversen, 4448 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for average lakeshore setback, 75 -foot lakeshore setback, hardcover to exceed 25%, hardcover within the 75 -foot lakeshore setback, and side yard setback for the construction of an addition to the home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial as applied. Background The subject property is substandard in size and a unique shape. The existing home was constructed prior to current regulations and is nonconforming. The existing one-story home does not meet the required front yard setback, side yard setback, 75 -foot lakeshore setback, or the average lakeshore setback. Due to the size and configuration of the lot there is no compliant building envelope. The property owners are proposing to construct a two-story addition with a rooftop terrace on the north side of the home. The proposed addition will include a school room on the first floor, a bedroom on the second floor, and a rooftop terrace above that. The addition will not encroach further into the lake yard than the current home. However, the addition will create a new vertical encroachment into the average lakeshore setback as the addition is taller than the existing home. The subject property is over on hardcover at approximately 27.33%. The proposed project includes the removal of a shed and some walkways and will reduce the overall hardcover slightly with a total proposed hardcover of 26.72%. The applicant is requesting variances from average lakeshore setback, 75 -foot lakeshore setback, hardcover to exceed 25%, hardcover within the 75 -foot setback and side yard setback for the construction of an addition. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the unique lot shape, substandard size of the lot and location of existing structure as practical difficulties. The lot is 0.46 acres in size when the LR -113 District requires a minimum 1 -acre lot size. The current home is constructed within required setbacks and any expansion of the home requires multiple variances from City Code. The proposed project would expand the house footprint within the 75 -foot lakeshore setback as well as require variances for average lakeshore setback, side yard setback and hardcover. The overall project will reduce the overall hardcover on the lot, but will still be over the maximum permitted. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: The substandard lot, unique shape and position of the existing home on the property create practical difficulties. The subject property does not have a compliant building envelope with the LR -113 setback restrictions combined with the lakeshore setback requirements. Staff is partially supportive of the request. Staff believes there are practical difficulties and support the construction of an addition in the proposed location. The proposed addition does not encroach further into the lakeyard and maintains the existing setbacks as much as possible. However, the proposed addition is two stories with a third story of a rooftop deck. While the height of the addition meets the overall height limitation of 30 feet, the addition creates a new vertical encroachment into the average lakeshore setback and extends beyond the existing roofline. The intent of the average lakeshore setback FILE #LA22-000064 June 20, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ordinance is to preserve lake views for neighboring properties. The height of the new addition may impact the neighboring property's lake views. Staff cannot support the height of the addition as it is not supported by practical difficulty and appears to be more out of convenience than a need. Staff is supportive of an overall decrease in hardcover; however, staff does not believe the applicant has accurately or thoughtfully proposed hardcover. There are several doors leading out to the yard without any patios, decks, or walkways proposed. Staff believes the plans do not accurately reflect the hardcover for the project and the overall hardcover need may be greater than what is proposed. Staff is not supportive of this application as applied due to the new second story and rooftop deck within the average lakeshore setback and hardcover encroachments. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 — Setbacks: 1-11-16 District Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' 13.4 No Change North Side 10' 8.5' 8.2' 75' 41' 41' (Addition is Lakeshore Hardcover 44' at the Tier closest point) Much of the existing single story home is in front of the ALS — Average Lakeshore the entire 2 story with roof top deck addition is in front of 5,057 s.f. the ALS Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1B District Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 20,228 s.f. (0.46 acre) 318 @ 75'/ 280' @ OHWL Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 20,228 s.f. (0.46 acre) Allowed: 4,045.6 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 2,896 s.f. (14.3%) Total Area in Zone Proposed: 3,172 s.f. (15.7%)* Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Total Area in Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 5,057 s.f. 5,529 s.f. 5,405 s.f. Tier 1 20,228 s.f. (25 %) (27.33%) (26.72%) • The Planning Commission should ask the applicant about additional hardcover to account for and potential stoops or landings required for the project. Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore & 75 -foot Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) Much of the existing home is situated lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and within the 75 -foot lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition on the north side of home. The addition is two stories with a rooftop terrace and an enclosed stairway for access above the second story. FILE #LA22-000064 June 20, 2023 Page 3 of 6 The new addition creates a new overall height of 30 feet for the home. The entire 344 square foot addition is within the 75 -foot lake setback. However, it does not encroach any further into the lakeyard than the existing house. The entire addition is also in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed addition protrudes beyond the existing height of the house by approximately 12 feet creating a new vertical encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700 and 78-1680) The property is approximately 0.46 acres in a one -acre minimum zoning district. The existing hardcover on the property is over the Tier 1 maximum of 25% total hardcover at 27.33% (78-1700). The proposed project will include an addition, but also the removal of a shed, deck and some walkways. The total proposed hardcover will be reduced to 26.72%. The proposed survey does not include any landings or hardscape near doors shown on the architectural plans. Staff has reason to believe the hardcover need may be greater than what is shown. The overall hardcover proposed is still over the maximum allowed and requires a variance. Additionally, City Code Section 78-1680 does not allow hardcover within the 75 -foot lakeshore setback. Much of the existing home and the entire proposed addition is located within the 75 - foot setback. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow an increase of approximately 70 square feet of hardcover within the 75 -foot lake setback. The proposed addition will take the place of a deck and therefore change the nature of the hardcover as well. Side Setback Variance (Section 78-330) The existing home is situated on the property 8.5 feet from the side property line. The required side yard setback per the 1_11-113 District is 10 feet. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition in the same plane as the existing home. Due to the slight angle of the property line the proposed addition slightly decreases the setback to 8.2 feet from the side property line and therefore a variance is requested. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The subject property is uniquely shaped, substandard in area, and has no compliant building envelope. Much of the home is within the 75 -foot lake setback and the average lakeshore setback. The proposed addition maintains the lakeyard setback. The proposal also decreases the overall hardcover as applied. These aspects of the application are in harmony with the Ordinance. However, the application proposes an increase in hardcover within the lakeyard and an addition that is taller than the existing home and therefore creating a new vertical encroachment in the FILE #LA22-000064 June 20, 2023 Page 4 of 6 average lakeshore setback. The addition of more hardcover within the protected lakeyard is not supported by the Ordinance. Also, the expansion of the second and third story rooftop terrace into the average lakeshore setback and potentially impacting the lake views for neighboring properties is not in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the application as proposed does not meet the intention of the Ordinance and the criterion is not met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in the construction of an addition to the existing single-family home is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has not identified the necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. This criterion is not met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of an addition to the home is reasonable, however the second story expansion for the addition is not reasonable. The proposed height creates a new vertical encroachment into the average lakeshore setback and is beyond the current roofline of the home. This criterion is not met. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size, unique lot shape, and location of the existing building on the property is unique to the property and not created by the property owner. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition may impact the lake views of neighboring properties and expands the amount of hardcover within the lakeyard. This is not in character with the neighborhood. This criterion is not met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR -113 District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The substandard lot size, unique lot shape, and the location FILE #LA22-000064 June 20, 2023 Page 5 of 6 of the existing structures on the lot are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the shape of the lot and location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home does not have a compliant building envelope and therefore any addition requires multiple variances. However, there is an existing home allowing for reasonable use of the property. This criterion is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances may adversely impact the lake views of the neighboring property owner as the proposed addition is approximately 12 feet taller than the existing roofline and creating a new vertical encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for the construction of a two-story addition with a rooftop terrace above the second story appear to serve more of a convenience than a necessity. Additionally, the plans depict exterior doors that would require additional hardcover within the 75' lakeyard setback. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has provided acknowledgement forms from the neighbors found in Exhibit G. No other public comment has been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Planning Commission find the addition's height is reasonable? 4. The Planning Commission should request additional information from the applicant regarding the hardcover plans within the 75' lakeyard. Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends denial of the application as applied. Staff is concerned with: 1. The overall height of the addition as it is a new vertical encroachment in the average lakeshore setback that may impact lake views. The proposed hardcover within the 75 -foot setback must be clarified. The plans indicate exterior doors on the addition that potentially require additional hardcover within the 75' lakeyard setback that is not included in the submitted material. FILE #LA22-000064 June 20, 2023 Page 6 of 6 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit C. Survey Exhibit D. Narrative Exhibit E. Plans Exhibit F. Hardcover Information Exhibit G. Neighbor Acknowledgements Exhibit H. Mailing List & Map 6/14/23, 9:21 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 12/02/2022 Address: 4448 North Shore Orono, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723310013 Land Use Number: LA22-000064 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: LEBRISIA IVERSEN Address: ANDREW IVERSEN 4448 NORTH SHORE DR Name: Lebrisia Iversen Applicant: Company: Address: 4448 N Shore Dr Orono, MN 55364 Lebrisia@karielstaging.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Andrew Iversen andrew@iradon.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Addition for residential Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermltControIIer?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=11147427&WorkOrder_ID=863... 1 /1 6/14/23, 9:24 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000064 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: N/A 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: N/A 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The new addition proposal is not an idea, but a necessity to accommodate more rooms/space for living conditions. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Confirmed 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Confirmed 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Yes, Our unique situation is unusual, odd, strange due to the road and waterway, where the house was built in 1950. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Yes, this is very unusual situation, that applies to this property. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=11147427&WorkOrder_ID=863... 1/2 6/14/23, 9:24 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Yes 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=11147427&WorkOrder_I D=863... 2/2 April 13, 2022 Andrew & Lebrisia Iverson 4448 North Shore Drive Orono MN 55364 Description of proposed addition /variance: We are proposing an addition on the Northeast corner of our home that would provide us a much- needed bedroom and a small room we would utilize as a classroom for home schooling our children. The addition we are proposing would not make any new wall closer to our side lot line, or the lake side of our home than it currently is now, it would simply be filling up a small corner that is currently our deck. Our lot is uniquely challenging because of the proximity to the lake / channel and the street. Due to this fact, any addition (no mater how small) would not "technically' be able to be approved without a variance. We want more than anything to be able to stay in our home and be able to raise our growing family here on our property. Allowing us this variance would give us that little bit of extra space we need to make this our forever home. Thank you for your time and consideration. PC Exhibit D 23-062 � LIVING UP I IT DECK------------------ Ir --- - - - - - - - 11'-6 1/2" \BATH =11 I \\ — Er F—� r BEDROOM BATH BEDROOM J j DINING _ 1 I - 1 FAMILY gigi gigi gigi 1 i I 1 1 1 - 1 1 KITCHEN " - -GARAGE 1 1 1 1 1 1 " UTILITY BEDROOMI 1 --BATH I" " I LAUNDRY " - I EXISTING ALAN 1/411 = V-0 Lu Z O Lu _, L ..nn Cl Vl L L O _ In %S) z v� L� -� z OL z ua w OL DATE: 5/23/2023 SCALE: SHEET: 1 OF 4 z O Lu Q w>-- -1 cm ED �w Cl z� OW LW Lu Lu a w ED z Lu Z O Lu _, L ..nn Cl Vl L L O _ In %S) z v� L� -� z OL z ua w OL DATE: 5/23/2023 SCALE: SHEET: 1 OF 4 0 Elevation 2 E2 ADDITION 11 '-6 1/2" - 90"14TG �I a w FIO m QIW N N WW BEAM OR 61RDER TO BE SIZED BY OTHERS OIH vu K LIVING OId W CD LBEAM OR 61RDER TO BE KIDS CLA55ROOM 51ZEDBYOTHER5 9' GEILIN65 I \ vu \ \ of \ NIW \ w I \ R' W \ o \ \ BATH Q HI ri ml \ - =UIP- - - - - - -� i 111F Ri I FAMILY BEDROOM DINING BEDROOM BEDROOM I , I I _ 1 _ 1 i J _ 1 i � I i i KITCHEN i Li i i �B�TH -LAUNDRY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — RAGE 1 1 1 MAIN LEVEL i i i i 0 I , I I _ 1 _ 1 i J _ 1 i � I i i KITCHEN i Li i i �B�TH -LAUNDRY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — RAGE 1 1 1 MAIN LEVEL LU Z O L _, L Cl to � L L O _ v' z v L� -� z z �l DATE: 5/23/2023 SCALE: SHEET: 2 OF 4 z 0 lti W Cl w>-- J m m Cl W z� O LU LU W Q w W z LU Z O L _, L Cl to � L L O _ v' z v L� -� z z �l DATE: 5/23/2023 SCALE: SHEET: 2 OF 4 z O LU Q w� -1m mQ �w z 0 OW D� } LU LU Q LU m z ROADWAY lb lb 1p (935.3) X93 1 .19 WALKOUT 19x6 I FLOOR= I ' (937.9) f I (936.7) I ! (940.3) II WELL OO ab.,E, CON (93 9) I u? .. 2�M• N1 v , r P� MH E 3� 9aQ,9,0000,0 DOCK I� J ` i (930.5' • l� \ 99 �O (5) ocp ,. -� V.1\ �� •O O O rICURB INDUS o ` P19x291 CIA 19 WALKOUT (939.0 X91 FLOOR= Q \ (934.4) J 9x\ WD FENCEPOST 9� EXISTING , 9 <�FR 3 URVEY HOUSE 1 t-� �'`t�1l LINE o.4� '•,,aFP O #4448 \ 15 I 2 9�1 , / / 1p OC�Ty� J / (G)sO (A) rn i9ua STFps / � ,1 N 1 ' 15 - \. \ i� / � r- \ \ / X \WO L FGARAG LOOR- g°j �'\ (931.8) s (931.1)' O \ \ s (933.0) MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER O/ OF "BERGQUIST' S 2ND •., \ \J y 9 75' ADDITION TO SAGA \ HILL / ��� \ \ `'' `�?�J •• SETBACK \ a `` LINE \ �� BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURB \ \ \ DRIVEWAY \ ` to / \\ CB \ \ (936.4 \ \ cB 929.4 CONTOUR �O 6i (93j9� (936.2 \ \ �•' LINE (O.H.W.) O O \ \ 931.5 CONTOUR--• " BLACKTOP LINE (100 -YEAR) 15' WIDE EASEMENT FOR CHANNEL <p Fq NoRDN i9338i g3 ;� MAINTENANCE AND EROSION PER (933.0) SHED S� ' �\ DOC. NO. T3116620 op UpF \ \ a2 ^' (937'6) CENTERLINE OF \ H.C.S.A.H. NO. 19 \ \ o NORTHERLY RIGHT- \ \ OF -WAY LINE OF \�� ✓ \ NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF H.C.S.A.H. N0. 19 \ X19 \ iS WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2,----- \ \9� \ "BERGQUIST' S ADDITION (9375 \ MH ] \ E.S. INV=(928.9) TO SAGA HILL" BLACKTOP ROADWAY CONCRETE � / ;p7,,7 � 7 / GUTT€�RN� ` [\ . -(a CB \ \\ "�� . '•, 30 DRAINAGE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2, t `-EASEMENT PER DOC. "BERGQUIST' S ADDITION V Q 605216 TO SAGA HILL" C 7% AM PLOT PLAN OF I z 0 r~ Lu C, w>__ J In ED Cl W } Lu } W W Cq w Lu ED Z VIEW SHOWING SUPPORT P05T5 AND BEAMS (ABOVE CEILING) z O LU Q w� -1m mQ �w z 0 OW D� } LU LU Q LU m z City of Orono �oNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: z/t/ yg Al 1�'i 4'F (4A4 A 6 u IyER S -Al) y�l�KESH00.E`- Prepared by: G�044ERG 4 A1'J'oc1ArFS, i.vc. Date: /2-Z-2/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)( Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1. XISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey Total (Square Feet (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A Alaz-exc 283Y S.F. B .S//E'D C 2 S. F. P S.F. D O S.F. E &e / 1164,t.-oA 5eV S.F. F K t/,FjZ-r 5 S.F. G S S.F. H S.F. <' AY 205 S.F. S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover 2 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover p S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1)] 5,S,27 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area A.-tPT i c L. .40 7 t OX vD G E ,1 A F.! ZQ 2 2 8 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) j 27-33 %, (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet E Property Address: _ � iyaR TN S,voR F Det t UE' (4 A1.04 fw I!/EitSo^1� f5HPrepared by: Date: -- GROiIJB CA? G7 j A 110 c 14 rr s`, 'Wc 5-90-13 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) QTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: OPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Square Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30 A 720 S.F. B xi}'T` 2 8 S.F. C TG IfEMOV S.F. G - S D „ S.F. L E S.F. F / 9! S .F. GT "� To C vE0 S.F. H A •• S.F. I 9 S.F. J a Cro L/E'01 S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. u S.F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Pro sed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Ci Code Sec 7&1684 p S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 O 05 S.F. S.F. 4 Total Lot Area .tial /A -,,1C e. R OAOPIAY R i 0 G f AR CA 20 22 P S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)+(4)] 26,72% Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 4448 N Shore Dr Orono MN 55364 Land Variance Residence: Andrew & Lebrisia Iversen Date: 4116/2022 As the neighbor of 4448 N Shore Dr Orono - Iversen Residence I approve the land variance that the Iversen residence is wanting. We do understand that the lot is uniquely challenging because of the proximity to the lakelchannel and the street. They showed me the addition that they are interested in building. As the residence of Property address: Name: 5.gWct one: I approve this la variance 1 Signature: Name: Date: -?�2 I would like to hear more information before I decide. Signature: Name: Date: I don't approve this land variance because Signature: Name: Date: 4448 N Shore Dr Orono MN 55364 Land Variance Residence: Andrew & Lebrisia Iversen Date: 4116/2022 As the neighbor of 4448 N Shore Dr Orono - Iversen Residence 1 approve the land variance that the Iversen residence is wanting. We do understand that the lot is uniquely challenging because of the proximity to the lake/channel and the street. They showed me the addition that they are interested in building. As the residence of nn Property address: �L-L�� �rr1 t1 at -E IJ r .`fie Name: Select one: I approve this land variance Signature: Name: 7o)e P Jnr . Lo --•� Date: t 1-- -) L- -) I would like to hear more information before I decide. Signature: Name: Date: I don't approve this land variance because Signature: Name: Date: 4448 N Shore Dr Orono MN 55364 Land Variance Residence: Andrew & Lebrisia Iversen Date: 411612022 As the neighbor of 4448 N Shore Dr Orono - Iversen Residence 1 approve the land variance that the Iversen residence is wanting. We do understand that the lot is uniquely challenging because of the proximity to the lake/channel and the street. They showed me the addition that they are interested in building. As the residence of Property address: 42-�— Name: l approve this land variance Signature: _ Name: Date: z� / Z I would like to hear more information before I decide. Signature: Name: Date: I don't approve this land variance because Signature: Name: Date: RUN DATE: 12/02/2022 38 07-117-23 310001 JOHN ONEILL/LAUREN ONEILL 4445 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 JOHN ONEILL/LAUREN ONEILL 4445 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310002 GREGG DANIEL KLOHN 4455 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 GREGG DANIEL KLOHN 4455 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310003 CHARLES WILLARD SANVIK 4465 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 CHARLES WILLARD SANVIK 4465 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310004 JOHN D & DEBRA M KNODEL 4485 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 JOHN D & DEBRA M KNODEL 4485 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310005 MICHAEL P RYAN 4495 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 MICHAEL P RYAN 4495 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310006 R N MCLELLAN REVOC TRUST 4515 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 RICHARD N MCLELLAN JANINE E MCLELLAN 27572 RIVERBANK DR BONITA SPGS FL 34134 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 07-117-23 310007 ROGER S/ELAINE M HAYDOCK TRS 4535 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ROGER S & ELAINE M HAYDOCK 810 MAIN ST N 9288 SPEARFISH SD 57783 38 07-117-23 310008 FRANK WEIGEL/ESTHER NAZAROV 4496 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 FRANK WEIGEL ESTHER NAZAROV 3916 N POTSDAM AVE PMB 3078 SIOUX FALLS SD 57104 38 07-117-23 310009 JOHN J GROTANS 4480 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 JOHN J GROTANS 3200 29TH AGE N E MPLS MN 55418 38 07-117-23 310010 JOHN J GROTANS ET AL 4470 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 JOHN ILZE & PETERIS GROTANS 3200 29TH AVE NE ST ANTHONY MN 55418 38 07-117-23 310013 38 07-117-23 42 0001 L IVERSEN & A IVERSEN JASON D FLINN 4448 NORTH SHORE DR 1310 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 LEBRISIA IVERSEN JASON D FLINN ANDREW IVERSEN 1310 VINE PL 4448 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 38 07-117-23 310029 38 07-117-23 42 0002 P SAWICKI & K M SAWICKI R J STERLING & K E STERLING 4510 NORTH SHORE DR 1300 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 P SAWICKI & K M SAWICKI RICK J & KRISTINE E STERLING 4510 NORTH SHORE DR 1300 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310030 38 07-117-23 42 0003 BETH E BESSESEN T BATTIS & K BATTIS 4500 NORTH SHORE DR 1325 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BETH E BESSESEN TIMOTHY BATTIS 4500 NORTH SHORE DR KATHLEEN BATTIS MOUND MN 55364 2066 BOULDER RD MOUND MN 55364 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 38 07-117-23 310035 38 07-117-23 42 0004 ERIC MEISEL & AMY Y MEISEL DAVID R YANIK 1355 VINE PL 1345 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ERIC MEISEL DAVID R YANIK AMY YANIK MEISEL 1345 VINE PL 1355 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 310039 38 07-117-23 42 0009 J W LOMA & L M LOMA CITY OF ORONO 4460 NORTH SHORE DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 JOSEPH W LOMA CITY OF ORONO 4460 NORTH SHORE DR P O BOX 66 MOUND MN 55364 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 310041 38 07-117-23 42 0010 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO 300 S 6TH STREET MC228 P O BOX 66 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 34 0001 38 07-117-23 42 0030 K P SCHMELING/J A SCHMELING JOHN R CHERBA 4423 NORTH SHORE DR 1350 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 KENNETH PAUL SCHMELING JOHN R CHERBA JUDITH A SCHMELING 1350 VINE PL 5115 MINNEAPOLIS AVE MOUND MN 55364 MINNETRISTA MN 55364 38 07-117-23 34 0002 38 07-117-23 42 0031 HENNEPIN COUNTY RYAN BEDUHN & ANDREA BEDUHN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1340 VINE PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN RYAN BEDUHN & ANDREA BEDUHN FACILITIES SERVICES 1340 VINE PL 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 MOUND MN 55364 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 07-117-23 34 0003 38 07-117-23 42 0034 K STOLTENBERG & S M ALBRECHT CITY OF ORONO 4425 NORTH SHORE DR 1380 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 KATHARINE STOLTENBERG CITY OF ORONO SCOTT M ALBRECHT P O BOX 66 4425 NORTH SHORE DR CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 34 0004 38 07-117-23 42 0037 TODD O LUNDMAN THOMAS EDMUND LINDER 4435 NORTH SHORE DR 1360 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 TODD O LUNDMAN THOMAS EDMUND LINDER 4435 NORTH SHORE DR 1360 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 RUN DATE: 12/02/2022 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 07-117-23 42 0039 K SUNGAARD-RIISE/J WISE 4340 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 KIRSTEN SUNGAARD-RIISE JAN WISE 4340 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0040 WILLIAM T SCHOENING 4380 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 WILLIAM T SCHOENING 4380 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0041 DANIEL P HOLLERMAN 1375 VINE PL ORONO MN 55364 DANIEL P HOLLERMAN 1375 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0017 C A/D R TWOMEY RES JT REV TR 4415 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 CHRISTOPHER A TWOMEY DARLA R TWOMEY 16743 W LOMA VERDE TRAIL SURPRISE AZ 85387 38 07-117-23 43 0018 ANDREW SCHMIDT TRUST 4395 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ANDREW H SCHMIDT JAMIE L LOHR 4395 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0031 NICHOLAS W J SUMMERS 4365 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 NICHOLAS SUMMERS 4365 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 12q Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 12/2/2022 4498 i4 449U r h.)re Dr k 4470 t'a rr- 44t. V ss 15 4954 35 444f9 485 • tai Buffer Size: 500 Map Comments: 4448 North Shore Drive me 1325 13.45 1355 'axe cl, 4423 4P -m 44 1364 1344 W 4340 43.60 �I North. -Shore fir 4395 0 50 100 200 Feet I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 05/11/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/19/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/182023 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator Natalie Nye, Planner June 20, 2023 \�kESHO #LA23-000022, Michael Clark, 565 Leaf Street, Variance for Accessory Structure Location Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a new accessory building streetward of the principal building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to construct a new accessory building streetward of the principal building. The proposed building will be used as a garage with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on the second floor. The garage will be constructed on the property between the principal building and the street, which is not permitted in the LR -1A zoning district. The applicant is requesting a variance in order to construct the new accessory building streetward of the principal building. All other building setbacks, hardcover, and lot coverage requirements are met. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the placement of the existing home on the property as a practical difficulty. The existing home is situated at the rear of the property. A new accessory building could not be constructed behind the home and therefore the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the construction of the accessory building streetward of the home. Additionally, there are topographical limitations that do not allow for the expansion of the existing attached garage. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The existing home is placed on the rear portion of the lot, 340 feet from the street, which limits the ability to construct an accessory structure in a compliant location. Staff believes the placement of the home and the topographical challenges that limit the expansion of the existing attached garage are practical difficulties supporting the variance request. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 — Accessory Building Setbacks: LR -1A District Accessory Building < 1,000 s.f. Required Proposed Front/Street 50' 168' Rear 15' 252' North Side 15' 15.2' South Side 30' 126' *Accessory buildings may not be located streetward of the principal building. Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1A District Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 87,123 s.f. (2.0 acre) 200' FILE #LA23-000022 June 20, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 87,123 s.f. (0.36 acre) Allowed: 17,424.6 s.f. (20%) District Tier Existing: 3,257 s.f. (3.7%) Proposed: 4,168 s.f. (4.8%) Section 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier Tier 1 21,780.8 s.f. 16,207 s.f. 17,520 s.f. (25%) (18.6%) (20.1%) Applicable Regulations: Accessory Building Placement Variance (Section 78-1440) The City Code limits the placement of accessory buildings to behind the principal building or home. The rural districts within the City (RR -1A, RR -113) allow construction of accessory building streetward of the home meeting all principle structure setbacks. However, the subject property is located within a Lakeshore Residential District (LR -1A) and the proposed placement of the garage requires a variance. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variance for the construction of a new accessory building is supported by practical difficulties. The placement of the existing home on the lot prevents a compliant location for an accessory building. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance resulting in the construction of a new accessory building in a residential zone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. FILE #LA23-000022 June 20, 2023 Page 3 of 4 a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; Constructing a new accessory building to be used as a detached garage is a reasonable use of the property. The current garage cannot be expanded due to topographical limitations. The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties in the topography and placement of existing improvements on the lot. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The placement of the existing home is unique to the property was not created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance will allow the construction of a new detached garage streetward of the principal building. The proposed location meets all required setbacks and is sufficiently screened from neighboring properties and the street. The proposed placement of the detached garage will not alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 7. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The placement of the existing home is unique to this specific property. This criterion is met. 8. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the specific location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 9. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing garage cannot be expanded due to topographical limitations. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. FILE #LA23-000022 June 20, 2023 Page 4 of 4 11. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variance allows for the construction of a new detached garage. The current attached garage cannot be expanded.. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Adjacent property acknowledgment form has been provided. No other public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Planning Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The proposed project is to construct a new accessory building to be used as a detached garage and accessory dwelling unit streetward of the principal building. A variance for placement of the accessory building is required. Staff recommends approval of the application as proposed with the following condition: 1. All Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) performance standards must be met including a covenant to be executed at the time of building permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Survey Exhibit E. Plans Exhibit F. Hardcover Information Exhibit G. Adjacent Property Acknowledgment Form Exhibit H. Mailing List & Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/11/2023 Address: 565 Leaf ST Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723410028 Land Use Number: LA23-000022 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: MICHAEL CLARK & MARCY CLARK Address: 565 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Michael Clark Company: Address: 565 Leaf St Long Lake, MN 55356 mclark@comerstonemediagroup.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: MICHAEL CLARK & MARCY CLARK Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Carriage House Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception _. Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: °''�� PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000022 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The carriage home's proposed use is for car storage, pool furniture in winter, bicycles, and a hobby/ home gym area. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property and house have a number of unique characteristics which are beautiful but due to the elongated lot and the position of the house on the back of the lot, the available land within current zoning regulations lacks sufficient space for an additional structure. The main house lacks sufficient storage space and has only a two -car garage on the main level and a tuck -under garage on the lower level, which is very difficult to access in winter. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed carriage house will be built within the character/harmony and quality of the existing home and surrounding neighborhood. This structure will not impede on our neighbor's site lines due to its locality in a hard forest over 200 feet away. It is also 150' away from the road (Leaf Street) and site lines are blocked by mature trees. The carriage house will improve the look upon entering the property by removing the old worn shed and replacing it with an appealing addition to the property. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The unique character, grade, and shape of the lot with the location of the house at the rear of the lot create inadequate space within current regulations. The house lacks adequate storage and car space for a family of four car owners. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The request complies with acceptable use of the property zone. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response:N/A S. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: This is a 2 -acre lot which should lend to sufficient area for an additional structure but the positioning of the existing home on the very back of the lot limits us to a proposed build in the side/front of the lot. Secondly, the lot is long and has a significant topography drop from south to north with no area for addition with a 2 -car garage skirt. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The property is unique in that it has no residential neighbors to the north, south, or east. This proposed structure should not impede or stick out in the unique semi -rural locality. Most of the 2 - acre lots in the area are squarer in shape and have houses positioned frontward on the lot, whereas ours is very long and narrow and the house is positioned at the very rear of the lot. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: We believe this to be true due to the lack of storage and functional car garage space on the current property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The proposed carriage house with not impede on-site lines or change the character of the neighborhood. It will be constructed under current building codes with quality products by licensed professionals. In addition, it will be eliminating the existing shed which is falling into disrepair as it ages. The underside of the shed has become home to various wild animals from feral cats to foxes to woodchucks which are health and safety concerns to our family. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Sufficient garage space is essential in Minnesota for the protection of property and that space is lacking in our existing house. Our existing shed is not large enough for our storage needs and is a health and safety concern. Clark Variance Application Property Address: 565 Leaf St Long Lake, MN 55356 Submitted by Mike and Marcy Clark My wife and I propose to build a carriage home on our lot at 565 Leaf Street, Long Lake MN. We moved here 3 years ago and have installed a pool at the rear of the house. The pool has increased our winter storage space needs due to pool equipment, patio chairs, etc. We also have four drivers in the family but only two usable garage spaces in the winter months. I am also in the process of retiring and need some hobby/workspace on the property. The home has a 2 -car garage on the main floor and a tuck -under garage accessible by a split driveway. This is very hard to access in the winter months due to snow. In addition, the angles for entry and departure to the tuck -under garage are very challenging due to the location of a retaining wall. There is no ability to expand the current garage space due to the sloping lot and the location of the tuck -under garage as built. This is creating the need for a secondary structure that will allow for increased garage and storage space. Our home was built onto the very back of a uniquely shaped lot which is very long, and narrow compared to most lots in the neighborhood. This does not allow us to build the carriage house to the rear of the main house. Our proposed site to build is in front of the existing home but on the side in a wooded area where an existing storage shed sits. This proposed build meets all of the setback requirements but is located forward of the house in relation to Leaf St. The percentage of hardscape once completed will be well under the limits set for the zone. We are looking for a variance to locate the carriage house forward of the main house. This addition to the property will have minimal impact on the site lines of our neighbors to the north or the road in front of the house. The design plan is to match the existing character and style of our house and the neighbors' outpost buildings to our north. We have no neighbors to the south and east of our lot by well over 300 ft. The proposed building will be done by a reputable firm to completion in a reasonable, agreed timeline. We truly believe this carriage home will be in harmony with the neighborhood and the city plan. In summary, the practical difficulties we face are due to our increased need for garage and storage space. We cannot feasibly expand our current garage to accommodate our needs. Zoning codes allow for the construction of a secondary structure but our unique property shape along with the positioning of the house requires us to place that structure forward of the house which requires this variance application. ". fy! .. '��r•.•--'--�� - ,'�'�r Yom,. -a J f 3 � S � � 9d vA Y l 9 -0n y 'p,, ■ 3 � S � kz M LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 3, FOX HOLLOW, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 6. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 7. It should be noted that this survey was done under snow and ice conditions and that all improvements may or may not have been shown correctly. While we did our best to locate all improvements under the snow and ice, we can't be sure that all improvements were shown. Please look over the survey to be sure everything you need shown is shown correctly. 8. While we show a proposed location for this garage, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. X 966.2 X 9E6.3 Found copped iron 65.3 965.2 966 - `� 966 / X 965.6 X 965.6 X 965.7 996 996- 6.0 �\ \5!\66.0 X 967.6 i/ 969.6 \ X 968, 896 " / / 2�2 97d\ _ _969 ' 6. x'970.3 � 970.7 �`%9.9 / ,X 970.1 a /X 968.E s96 -- ' 970.5 A 91 X J. g1 1 Found 2" 3"d - h X� 7 69.9 1 ' -- Existing Stone Wa/k 970.5 4 ° 4 y6�3.8 '/ 96 ,9,4 / 4 %9.9 pin p °O 4 e 970 4 o e 41 e A a , A 971.. 971.1 X71. K 968.9 968,7 4 A 6 9s. 969.3 \ GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. • If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Orono requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. PC Exhibit D LEGEND W, = CATCH BASIN GM = GAS METER = FIRE HYDRANT 0 = POWER POLE = MANHOLE ® = TELEPHONE PED. 8 = ELEC. TRANSFORMER 0 = WELL ® = GATE VALVE = LIGHT POLE -X-X- = FENCE LINE S = SANITARY SEWER LINE W = WATER LINE G = GAS LINE ST = STORM DRAIN LINE E = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE - -970- - = EXISTING CONTOUR X 970.5 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 970 = PROPOSED CONTOUR 970.5 = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION = DRAINAGE ARROW SF = PROPOSED SILT FENCE a - CONCRETE SURFACE a A N 89 42'15" W Found 1/2" _ - -220.00- - - 1961.2 T�C 964.4 h Drainage and Utility Easement t-,o�umd Gappedro 10 k 65 / OO 1163/9 g "X 965.2 i JJ12- SF -� SF ---INSTALL S/LT FENCE N 89 42'15" W g6"/9966 66 18 42- - Fou5 �, 967 X ' -15.2 / / _ _ 998 / 168.0 Drainage and Utility Easement >y9�.9 X 963--r-964.5 -I_ - 988.0 969.0, ----------------------- iL S�-/ 37.0_ s� 967.6 g65 " v67. PROPOSED x isting GARIA GE� s E 112.0 0/GfF 9708�/o / g6 X�6�6� / X 969.8 ZO 467.8x LL PORCH O / 96g � 41692 X 969.7 5 6� X 969,4 X 969,5 Drive / 969 969.7 9 X 969,7 Wall J I - _ 9 WALK O -90.0 aUs isting LL PRO s7o / ,� X 970.1 �0 POSED I -- itUrnin Ex � �,, - _�� B I 968,2 X H WAY / 9696 �_ - -DRO _ - ' n� TI 970.4 ` 9709 97 ° ° 4 \ / 970.8 < e4 11\ 9687 968.6 968,7 74, O .6 A b Xis ° 9�i9,0 g> %9.6 n ting a 0 ? c� n, \/ 4 Ea r 6 h r°p�AN �0 ��s 97'40 9>3 - Existing Stone Steps V X75.3 F 97L0 P �0 moo,, 'Soi 9j4 7-3.5 / L / _ - �,� }/s�/ ° 970.9 C(� OL �� 96, 0 e 6C 97 `a1` 179 ° �° �� 'S� 990 976.1` 9>S 974,3 y0��t Se 975. \�\\ ,c �C �� �, 6 ' - V ~ 9j � 97s.2 Existing ° - 976. 971.2 Q o„ �-------- a 9790 97 . Ret. ��! kA 978,2 7 2 \ 976.6 \ 976.9 \ 78.1 \ 9j9 9 9719 °J 2s J a / / _978.9 9 977. 97 - - - - J X "A4977,3 6�C / 7 97 9.3 8, 7 1�� \a , 0 979.6 ( i 1 a 978.3 79.1 a 9S� X 78 �° 977,0 973.3 V 69r �� ( 979.7 I7,8 78.2 t \ 976 0 9g, 979,7 7 \ a° 7 a 979.6 /1 979.3 979,4 11� ' 979,7 \ +� o 978.6 .79,2 79. / \ X� �7� 9�7. ice 0978.8 981.3 4Existing 1 979.7 1 ° \ Zgs� 979.8 O`er^ 979.5 Pavers 979.2 979,2 ,8X \ F8s � 9818 s 979 979.8 ` �8B 979,8 �- X 985.9 S8g \ \ 83.6 \ 981.9 979.9 79.9 79.8 X 984,6_ \ \ 9�i)Oi - - 979.2 / \ \ X g9 2 79.7 1979.8 � �j a x�so,r - �E: - - - - ` / \ o `X \ � g \ `9%9,6 / , X81,41-1 985,8 s86 X 9844 \ �Q,98 • 981,5 981.6 981.5 " -'r - _ 1 -- Z86 F86 _ / O _ __4_ _' 983.1 984.6 �� Ret. Wall / L - - - - - - - - - - Q) x x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -'---------------------- x x x x xxxx- - Found AM DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT NAME / JOB ADDRESS MICHAEL CLARK 565 LEAF STREET OR ONO, MN A 980.5 969.8/ 970.3 Existing Bituminous Drive Existing Bituminous N, _9 99O.�J 18.0-- 96 ``969.9 970.5 970.6 970.5 Drive ---R-----_X----- ---------- X -----X Drainage and Utility Easement --52728-- S 89 40'17" E Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com Existing I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE AWS OF T E S7 OF INNESOTA. Thomas M. Bloom # 42379 LICENSE NO. APRIL 10, 2023 DATE X 970.4 Existing 970.5 DATE SURVEYED: APRIL 6, 2023 DATE DRAFTED: APRIL 10, 2023 I 10 - - - - J h SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SURVEY DRAWING NUMBER 2303 70 JR SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 r`I IrrT r. I^ S1 SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWING KEY: STUD WALL - FOUNDATION WALL Foundation Plan 1/4" = 1'-O" " STONE LEDGE 11-11" 81-211 1'-111' 31-51' 18'-211 3'-511 M.O. M. 0. 121-011 251-011 371-011 © 2023 Wlndmiller Da ign Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design Sl.dio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W �10 Ln ^ co V Z O O 0 Q) V) Q � a� J U Ln NME: ERRORS OR CMISSIONSNAL DESIGN STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR E NTgA F 10—NERMUST EPNDCRECK ALLNOTES. AILS. E—IONSNSECTIGNS NDMI—EE ON All BRBRIEPOCOFFEOCTMION FFIOR TO THE START OF CONSTFUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 Al .0 FOUNDATION PLAN r - � 7-� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , co 101-011 5'-0" 0 I CD N N — c';Ei O O coO UNEXCAVATED o T "' 0 o o 1 0 Ch C 21-011 10'-211 I I g O LILL " STONE LEDGE 11-11" 81-211 1'-111' 31-51' 18'-211 3'-511 M.O. M. 0. 121-011 251-011 371-011 © 2023 Wlndmiller Da ign Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design Sl.dio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W �10 Ln ^ co V Z O O 0 Q) V) Q � a� J U Ln NME: ERRORS OR CMISSIONSNAL DESIGN STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR E NTgA F 10—NERMUST EPNDCRECK ALLNOTES. AILS. E—IONSNSECTIGNS NDMI—EE ON All BRBRIEPOCOFFEOCTMION FFIOR TO THE START OF CONSTFUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 Al .0 FOUNDATION PLAN c c M DRAWING KEY: STUD WALL - FOUNDATION WALL Main Level Plan - 990 S.F. 1/4" = 1'_011 12'-31/4" 5'-111/2" 3'-51/4" 15'-4" 0 0 M © 2023 Wlndmiller Design Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design Sl.dio. 95 .250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM O O 0 NME: STRUCIURMF OR SIMENS COAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, ILLET RESIGN STUDIO, LLC, ASSUMES NO HESPoNSIBILITY FOR THE 1�11�TF' NTgA F 10—NEREMUST EPNOCHECK ALLNOTES. AI 9, ELEVATIONS. SECTIONS O.,—CORRECTION PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A1.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Y N NME: CTURMF OR DIMENS COAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, DESIGN STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO HESPoNSIBILITY FOR rvm�ToF-10Row ErvERMUST EANECREC ALLNOTEs. AI LS, ELEVATIONS. SECTIONS NDMI—EE ON Posses CCNR nory FNOR TO THE START OF CONSTFUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A1.2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN 37'-0" 12-21 /4" 2-3 3/4" 31-0" 51-1011 \ O _ Q ]� I I I I I I i I I I I m D I C? U z Iiw 51-011 KNEE WALL 21-3 3/411 6'-f1/2" –-----------C'V ' ERCIS BATH 81- "VAULT HEIGHT 2'-6" TILE CD r x O N c0 N 6-676 ING ze I _________z_____________ Q v I I I w 5'-0" KNEE WALL -- - o o m (r48" DIA. I I I I ABLE I I ----, - LIVI IROOM 9'-0" VAULT HEIGHT C? F Iw z Y co r I I o a a I cox z CV m N I I Cp I I o J I I 0 I 1'-4 2" - r J Cpw W Y O Ln IM - (2)3'-0' X51-1011 DRAWING KEY: 1 EXISTING STUD WALL 4'-51/2' 16'-1" DEMO WALL r L - NEW STUD WALL 25'-0" l Upper Level Plan - 728 S.F. A1.2 1/4" = 1'-0" © 2023 Windmiller Da ign Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design St"dio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Y N NME: CTURMF OR DIMENS COAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, DESIGN STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO HESPoNSIBILITY FOR rvm�ToF-10Row ErvERMUST EANECREC ALLNOTEs. AI LS, ELEVATIONS. SECTIONS NDMI—EE ON Posses CCNR nory FNOR TO THE START OF CONSTFUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A1.2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN I— — — — — — — — — — — I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — t — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I Exterior Elevation 1/4" = 1'-O" GUTTERS -611 GALVANIZED STEEL GUTTERS, BLACK SOFFIT & FASCIA -3 1/2" FASCIA - HARDIE SOFFIT _ PLATE HEIGHT SEE PLAN SIDING -VERTICAL TONGUE & GROOVE 5 1/2" PLANKS -HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING HARDIE LAP, 7" REVEAL W/ WOOD TEXTURE -211 STONE VENEER W/ 3" CAP, SELECTION BY OWNER TOP OF SUBFLOOR _ PLATE HEIGHT WINDOW/ DOOR TRIM -1X6 HARDIE TRIM BOARD -1X2 AT HEAD TRIM BOARD FLASHING AS REQ'D _ TOP OF BLOCK � _ TOP OF FOOTING � © 2023 Wmdmiller Design Studio. Reprodutlion solely by Windmiller Design Studio. 95 .250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM NME: ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, ILLET DESIGN SlU010, LLC, ASSUMES NO RE-SIBILIiY FOR THE SJGCCN nrvomAow Ery AEMNsr EAoNDCREBrcnLL NOTES. fAILS, ELEVATIONS. SECTIONS oFLOORR ANDrvonFr WINDM I L" DES ON STUDIO, — OF ERRORS OR 0"'SIONS 101 TTHE'STARTOFCONSTF-ON ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION PLATE HEIGHT TOP OF SUBFLOOR PLATE HEIGHT TOP OF BLOCK TOP OF FOOTING Exterior Elevation 1/4" = 1'-O" co I I I I I I ----------------------------- — — — — — — — — — — —------------ - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —t ------------ ----------- — — — — — — — — — — I © 2029 Wmd.ih, Design Sudio. Reprodutlion solely by Windmiller Design Studio. 95 .250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM O O 0 NME: STRUCTURMF OR SIMENS COAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, ILLET DESIGN SlU010, LLC. _LIMES NO HEBPoNSIBILIiY FOR SJGCCN nrvomAow Ery AEMNsr EpA.GCREBrcnLL NOTES. ILS, E-IIONS. SECTIONS o FLooREuws ANO — _ ERRORS OR OM"'IONI 101 TREB HTOF€oN�� ON ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 12 PLATE HEIGHT 14D - - - 14:12 v 60 M 1 CV TOP OF SUBFLOOR M PLATE HEIGHT s TOP OF BLOCK o TOP OF FOOTING 1 Exterior Elevation A2.2 1/4" = 1'-0" © 2029 Wmd.ih, Design Smdlo. Reprodutlion solely by Windmiller Design Studio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM O O 0 ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION PLATE HEIGHT - - TOP OF SUBFLOOR PLATE HEIGHT TOP OF BLOCK TOP OF FOOTING Exterior Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" J J © 2023 Windmiller Design Studio. Reprodutlion solely by Windmill, Design Studio. 95 .250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W �10 Ln ^ co V Ln Q Z ry O O 0 N ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A2.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 14:12 Building Section 1/4" = 1'_011 co TOP OF FOOTING ©2M Windmille, Design Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design St"dlo. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Lu �10 ^ co VLn Ln Z 0::� �E NME: ERRORS OR OMISSIONSNAL ILLET RESIGN STUDIO, LLC, ASSUMES NO RE-SIBILITY FOR THE _—SHI—THE TONTNAC o ORS REMUBT EPNOCNECI( FLLNGTES. AILS. E -LIONS. SECTIONS All BRBRIE"CORROCTMIOR _OR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A3.0 BUILDING SECTION TYPICAL ROOF: 12 RIDGE VENT & ROOF VENTS AS REO'D ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES 14 ASPHALT FELT PAPER 2 COURSES ICE & WATER SHIELD @ ALL EAVES AND VALLEYS AND 100% COVERAGE ON LOWER 6 FT 5/8" ROOF SHEATHING ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES BY MANUFACTURER R-49 (MIN) 16 1/2" FIBERGLASS BLOWN -IN INSULATION 12 ROOF TRUS ES BY MFG. OR, 7" CLOSED CELL POLYURETHANE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 4p 6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD CEILING (SMOOTH FINISH) - I PLATE HEIGHT h i � I i LIVING ROOM 3/4" T&G PLYWC OD SUBFLOOR °c° GLUED & SCREWED FO FLOOR TRUSSES T VERIFY SPACING &I SIZE W/ SUPPLIER J 80 SPRAY FOAM INSULATION & SEALER oLLJ R 49 MIN AT CEILINGS A D ROOFS, R 38 MIN AT FLOOR z 5/8" TYPE 'IN" GYP BD Y TOP OF SUBFLOOR v M PLATE HEIGHT 2'-0" � 2'-0II I TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL: SIDING PER ELEVATION r co HOUSEWRAP `-�� r 1/2" EXTERIOR PLYWOOD SHEATHING GA G E o - - � 7 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. 5/8' GYP. OARD ALL _ _ a' R-20 (MIN) BATT INSULATION COMMON WALLS & 6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER CEI ING 1/2' INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD, SMOOTH FINISH. I c "CONCRETES BON GRADE TOP OF BLOC II 4 �� II III 6 MIL. MIN. POLY VAPOR BARRIER W/ TAPED SEAMS ' 2" RIGID INSULATION o 411 MIN. GRANULAR FILL 4v TOP OF FOOTING ©2M Windmille, Design Studio. Reprod�aion solely by Windmiller Design St"dlo. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Lu �10 ^ co VLn Ln Z 0::� �E NME: ERRORS OR OMISSIONSNAL ILLET RESIGN STUDIO, LLC, ASSUMES NO RE-SIBILITY FOR THE _—SHI—THE TONTNAC o ORS REMUBT EPNOCNECI( FLLNGTES. AILS. E -LIONS. SECTIONS All BRBRIE"CORROCTMIOR _OR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE DATE 5.10.23 A3.0 BUILDING SECTION 952.250.1941 WIN DMILLERDESIGNSTU DIO.COM N rv�` ISSUE DATE A3.1 BUILDING SECTION I I ROOF TRUSSES BY MFG. PLATE HEIGHT _ 12 14:12 14 �I co EXERCISE T 4" T&G PLYWC OD SUBFLOOR w GLU & SCREWED FO FLOOR TRUSSES J VE IFY SPACING & SIZE W/ SUPPLIER S RAY FOAM I NSL LATION & SEALER o 49 I AT CEILINGS AD ROOFS, R 38 MIN AYn w 12 FL OR Y 5/8" TYPE " GYP BD 12 TOP OF SUBFLOOR PLATE HEIGHT r mm L CIR I I S v' 2'-011 co I OFFICE INSULATED & ROCKED gHEET 5/8" GYP. OARD ALL COMMO WALLS & CEILING I TOP OF BLOCK " CONCRETES B ON GRADE 6 MIL. MIN. POLY VAPOR EARRIER W/ TAPED SEAMS 0 2" RIGID INSULATION 4" MIN. GRANULAR FILL ,>. TOP OF FOOTING 1 Building Section A3.1 1/4" = 1'-0" © 2023 Windmill,, D,69n %di,. Reproduction solely by Windnill„ Design SNdn. 952.250.1941 WIN DMILLERDESIGNSTU DIO.COM N rv�` ISSUE DATE A3.1 BUILDING SECTION ILS W-117z[s)[i=3 WINDMILLER DESIGN STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO THESE PLANS INDICATED CONCEPTUAL TRUSS CONFIGURATIONS AND GENERAL FRAMING INFORMATION: RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRUCTURAL OR DIMENSIONAL PLANS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY THE MANUFACTURER ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. WINDMILLER DESIGN LICENSED TO PRACTICE WITHIN THE STATE OF THE PROJECT, PRIOR TO ALL WOOD FRAMING TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL STUDIO, LLC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE 1. IMPORTANT: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ±. GENERAL BUILDING CODES AND THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD WORKMANSHIP OF THE SUB -CONTRACTORS. THE NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM THESE PLANS. CONSTRUCTION PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FOREST PRODUCTS CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CONSTRUCTION. ASSOCIATION(NFPA) CHECK ALL NOTES, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS ETC. NECESSARY FOR INSTALLATION. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FRAMING & EXTERIOR AND FLOOR PLANS AND NOTIFY WINDMILLER DESIGN SHEATHING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IMPORTANT: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ±. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO FIELD STUDIO, LLC. OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR LVL LUMBER PROPERTIES: VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO THE START OF SCALED DRAWINGS. CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION. E = 1,900,000 PSI 4. ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS & CONNECTIONS ROOF PLAN NOTES: - TYPICAL ROOFING SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES, ROOFING FELT/SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT OVER ROOF SHEATHING. - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PREFORMED STANDING SEAM METAL PANELS, RED ROSIN PAPER, ROOFING FELT/SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT OVER ROOF SHEATHING. - METAL PANS WHERE INDICATED SHALL BE FLAT SOLDERED SEAMED COPPER OVER W.R GRACE "ULTRA" SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. IF FIELD SEAMING IS PERFORMED PLACE 2 LAYERS ROOFING FELT UNDER SEAM LOCATIONS TO PROTECT UNDERLAYMENT. - ROOFING FELT SHALL BE UL RATED 30 LB ASPHALT SATURATED ORGANIC FELT. -TYPICAL SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE W.R. GRACE "ICE AND WATER SHIELD." INSTALL AT FOLLOWING LOCATIONS; 1) ALONG EAVES EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF 36" HORIZONTALLY UP ROOF BEYOND THE INSULATED WALL LINE, 2) 36" SHEET WIDTH ALONG GABLE (RAKE) ENDS, 3) 36" SHEET WIDTH AT VALLEYS, 4) 36" SHEET WIDTH AT ROOF/WALL INTERSECTIONS, 5) ALL AROUND CHIMNES, SKYLIGHTS, AND OTHER ROOF PENETRATIONS, 6) COMPLETELY AT ALL ROOFS LESS THAN 4:12 PITCH, 7) 26: SHEET AT ROOF PITCH TRANSITIONS, 8) OTHER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY CODE - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL DRIP FLASHING ALONG ALL EAVES AND RAKE ENDS TO HAVE MINIMUM 6" FLANGE ONTO ROOF SURFACE. - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL VALLEY FLASHING WITH 1" V -CRIMP, 12" MINIMUM UP EACH SIDE OF VALLEYS OR WEAVE SHINGLES AT VALLEYS. INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING AT ROOF PITCH TRANSITIONS - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING ALONG ROOF/WALL INTERSECTIONS AND ALONG ROOF/CHIMNEY INTERSECTIONS. - CONFORM WITH "SMACNA" ARCHITECTURAL SHEET METAL MANUAL, LATEST EDITION FOR ALL METAL ROOFING, FLASHING, AND ROOF PENETRATION SYSTEMS. - RIDGE VENTS TO BE HIGH PROFILE, PLASTIC TYPE, SHINGLE OVER VENT SYSTEM (COR -A -VENT V-600 SERIES OR EQUAL). INSTALL CONTINUOUSLY ALONG RIDGES. - INSTALL ROOF TO WALL VENTS (COR -A -VENT ROOF -2 -WALL VENT OR EQUAL) WHERE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. - NOT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS ARE INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. COORDINATE FLUES, DRYER VENTS, PLUMBING STACKS, ETC. AND PROVIDE ACCESSORIES AND INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. ALL PENETRATIONS SHOULD BE PLACED ON REAR SIDE OF ROOF IF POSSIBLE. REVIEW ALL PENETRATION LOCATIONS IN FIELD WITH OWNER. IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS: 1. THESE DRAWINGS ARE DESIGN DRAWINGS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HAS THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO REVISE CONFIGURATIONS AND DETAILS DEPICTED IN THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN DRAWINGS, AS REQUIRED, TO PROPERLY CONSTRUCT A TECHNICALLY SOUND PROJECT. 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT WHEN DEVIATING FROM THE DESIGN INTENT. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL COVENANTS, ZONING, BUILDING, FIRE, HEATING, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. *PROVIDE SELF SEALING ASPHALT MEMBRANE (ICE SHIELD) AT ALL VALLEYS SELF SEALING ASPHALT MEMBRANE \ (ICE SHIELD) -FIRST (2)ROWS 15 LB. ASPHALT ROOFING FELT ASPHALT SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED 9" SHINGLE STARTER PREFINISHED METAL EDGE DETAIL AT TYPICAL ROOF EDGE 1 /2II _ v_0lI © 2023 Windmills, Dssign Studio. Rep,od"dion solely by Windmillo, Design Studio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Lu �10 Ln ^ co VLn Ln \ Z 1� \ O C= 0 '^) V O Y N i I..L V) 4J J Ln U Ln NM ERRORS OS OMISSIONS, RESIGN STUGIO, LLC, ASSUMES NO RE-SIBILIiY FOR rvS.— H DIO Sw ErvEREMUST o GRED ALLNOTEs. EAI LS,AryELEVATIONS, SECTIONS All seROCONR nory_OR TO THE START OF CON- I. ISSUE DATE FARWRAWA BUILDING DETAILS THESE PLANS INDICATED CONCEPTUAL TRUSS CONFIGURATIONS AND LOADING CONDITIONS. ALL FLOOR AND ROOF TRUSSES INDICATED ON THESE PLANS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY THE MANUFACTURER GENERAL NOTES: LICENSED TO PRACTICE WITHIN THE STATE OF THE PROJECT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION VERIFY ALL POINT LOAD AND BEARING CONDITIONS AND 1. IMPORTANT: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ±. GENERAL COORDINATE POSTS AND BEARING REQUIREMENTS WITH THE BUILDER. CONTRACTOR TTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM THESE PLANS. CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION. AND FURNISH ALL BLOCKING, STIFFENERS, BRACING, FASTENERS, HARDWARE, ETC. NECESSARY FOR INSTALLATION. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FRAMING & EXTERIOR SHEATHING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONVENTIONAL LUMBER TO BE HEM -FIR #2 GRADE OR BETTER. MINIMUM LVL LUMBER PROPERTIES: 3. ALL DIMENSIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER Fb = 2,600 PSI SCALED DRAWINGS. Fv = 285 PSI E = 1,900,000 PSI 4. ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS & CONNECTIONS TO BE ENGINEERED BY SUPPLIER. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE: EXTERIOR WALLS (INCLUDING GARAGE WALLS) TYPICALLY TO BE 2X6 CONSTRUCTION, INTERIOR WALLS TYPICALLY TO BE 2X4, 5. ALL WINDOW HEADERS TO BE 2- 2X1 O'S UNLESS INTERIOR WALL WITH POCKET DOORS TO BE 2X6 CONSTRUCTION. POCKET OTHERWISE NOTED. DOORS TO BE CUSTOM FABRICATED WITH'TIMBERSTRAND ENGINEERED FRAMING". CABINET WALLS AND BALLOON FRAMED WALLS SHALL BE FRAMED 6. ALL WOOD ABUTTING CONCRETE TO BE TREATED. WITH'TIMBERSTRAND'. 7. ALL ANGLES TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESS PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TYPICALLY TAKEN TO OUTSIDE OF WALL SHEATHING AT OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTERIOR WALLS AND TO CENTER LINES OF FACE OF STUD AT INTERIOR WALLS. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSTALLALL PRODUCTS PER MANUFACTURERS' COLUMN SIZES SHALL NOT EXCEED CRUSHING STRENGTH OF THE PLATES RECOMMENDATIONS. THEY BEAR ON- SIZE AS REQUIRED. UTILIZE SQUASH BLOCKING OR BEAR DIRECTLY ON FOUNDATION. 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT PRIOR TO USE PRESERVATIVE TREATED COLUMNS, BEAMS, PLATES, MISC. FRAMING SUBMITTING PROOF OF INSURANCE AND MEMBERS AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND AS CALLED OUT IN PLANS. APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. WHERE WOOD FRAMING SIZES ARE INDICATED, MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY 10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND HIS GRADE AND SPACING REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM L/480 DEFLECTION. SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS BEFORE STARTING THE WORK, AND ALL FLOOR BEAMS TO BE SET FLUSH WITH FLOOR FRAMING UNLESS OBTAIN SIGN -OFFS UPON COMPLETION OF THE INDICATED OTHERWISE. WORK. ALL ROOF BEAMS TO BE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND SERVICES NECESSARY DROPPED FLOOR BEAMS OR ROOF BEAMS SHALL BE 12" MAXIMUM DEPTH TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK, AND UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SHALL COORDINATE ALL TRADES, MATERIAL DELIVERY SCHEDULES, ETC. TO PERFORM THE SILL PLATES SHALL BE 2X6 MINIMUM. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 1/2" MIN. JOB IN THE MOST EXPEDITIOUS MANNER. DIAMETER (U.N.O.) CAST IN PLACE WITH T EMBED. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL HAVE 2" DIA. X 0.125" THICK WASHERS TIGHTENED AND COUNTERSUNK 1/4" 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE INTO THE TOP OF THE SILL PLATE. SPACING SHALL BE 48" O.C. WITH A MIN. OF FOR THE SECURITY OF ALL BUILDING MATERIALS TWO BOLTS PER PIECE WITH BOLT LOCATED NO MORE THAN 12" OR LESS THAN AND FIXTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND 4" FROM EACH END OF EACH PIECE. PROVIDING ALL NECESSARY PROTECTION TO EXISTING OCCUPIED AREAS. AT TILED FLOOR AREAS USE MUDSET METHOD AND DEPRESS FLOOR SHEATHING SO IT IS FLUSH WITH TOP OF FLOOR FRAMING (SHEATHING IN 13. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM DAILY BETWEEN FRAMING MEMBERS) CLEAN-UP OF THE JOB SITE. WINDOW DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS INDICATE FRAME WIDTH X HEIGHT. VERIFY 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM FINAL ROUGH OPENING SIZES WITH WINDOW MANUFACTURER. CLEAN-UP OF THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. ASA MINIMUM, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS, PROVIDE DOUBLE STUD AT ALL HEADER AND LINTEL SUPPORTS (ONE FULL HEIGHT KING STUD 15. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL AND ONE JACK STUD) LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL CODES. 16, THE PREVAILING BUILDING CODE IS THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE (RBC) . SHEATHING: 17. CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE PERFORMED TO ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO HAVE CONTINUOUS PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING. CURRENT STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING & EACH PANEL OF SHEATHING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH THE APPROPRIATE ENERGY CODES AND LOCAL INDUSTRY GRADE - TRADEMARK OF THE AMERICAN PLYWOOD ASSOCIATION. STANDARDS AND STANDARD INDUSTRY PRACTICES. PROVIDE 1/8" SPACE AT EDGES AND ENDS OF EACH SHEET OR AS REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER. 18. ALL WINDOWS & DOORS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION GRADE AND TYPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: REQUIREMENTS AND THE MINNESOTA LATH AND ROOF SHEATHING: 40/20 APA RATED SHEATHING EXPOSURE 1 PLASTER BUREAU REQUIREMENTS. EXTERIOR WALL: 24/16 APA RATED SHEATHING EXPOSURE 1 FLOORS: 48/24 APA RATED SHEATHING EXPOSURE 1 (T&G) 19. ALL WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIERS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PER IRC SEC. R703.2 AS AMENDED BY 5/8" MINIMUM ROOF SHEATHING TO BE ATTACHED WITH 0.113" DIAMETER NAILS THE STATE OF MINNESOTA RULES SECTION AT 6" O.C.; EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD. PROVIDE 6" O.C. NAILING TO ALL MEMBERS IN 1309.0707 LINE WITH SHEAR WALLS. EDGE FASTENERS SHOULD BE PLACED 3/8" FROM PANEL EDGES AND ENDS OR AS REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER. 20. ENGINEERING- ALL HVAC, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, SOILS AND STRUCTURAL 3/4"MINIMUM FLOOR SHEATHING TO BE GLUED AND ATTACHED WITH 0.113" ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED DIAMETER NAILS @ 6" O.C. EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD. BY THE RESPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER OF THOSE SYSTEMS AND COORDINATED BY THE 1/2" MINIMUM PLYWOOD EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING TO BE ATTACHED WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. INFORMATION HEREIN 0.113" DIAMETER NAILS AT 6" OC.; EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN THESE REGARDS IS PROVIDED FOR NOTED ON PLANS. CLARIFICATION OF THE OVERALL PROJECTS DESIGN INTENT ONLY. INTERIOR SHEAR WALLS TO HAVE 5/8" GYPSUM SHEATHING BOTH SIDES OF WALLATTACHED WITH 6d COOLER NAILS OR WALLBOARD NAILS AT 7" O.C. 21. PRODUCT INFORMATION- PROVIDE SAMPLES EDGE, 12" O.C. FIELD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL MATERIALS AND FABRICATED ITEMS TO THE EXTENT THE OWNER SPLICE ALL SHEATHING ON A COMMON MEMBER SO AS TO PROPERLY HAS FULL UNDERSTANDING OF THE PRODUCTS TRANSFER SHEAR FORCES. AND/OR DESIGN OF. ALL SHEATHING NAILING TO BE COMMON WIRE OR GALVANIZED NAILS. 22. SPECIFICATIONS- CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCLOSE TO THE OWNER AND COORDINATE ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL ASPECTS OF THE WORK THAT ARE NOT INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS OR CONCRETE WORK: PRE -SELECTED BY THE OWNER. DO NOT BEGIN CONCRETE WORK UNTIL ALL LOADING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. NOTE: VERIFY GIRDER OR POINT LOADS WITH TRUSS/JOIST SUPPLIER THAT ARE ASSOCIATED ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING WITH STRUCTURE NOT INDICATED ON PLANS AND CODES AND ORDINANCES. CONCRETE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CANNOT BE SUPPORTED ON TYPICAL SPREAD REQUIREMENTS. FOOTING. NOTIFY FOOTING & FOUNDATION SUPPLIER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE 8" MINIMUM CONCRETE WORK, REINFORCED WITH #4'S AT 24" O.C. EACH WAY AT 3/4" CLEAR OF INSIDE FACE. WALLS 10" OR THICKER SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF #4'S AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY AT 3" CLEAR FROM EXTERIOR FACE. PROVIDE DOWELS TO FOOTING TO MATCH MAIN VERTICAL WALL REINFORCEMENT, AND HOOK 12" INTO FOOTING AT 3" CLEAR OF BOTTOM. ROOF PLAN NOTES: - TYPICAL ROOFING SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES, ROOFING FELT/SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT OVER ROOF SHEATHING. - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PREFORMED STANDING SEAM METAL PANELS, RED ROSIN PAPER, ROOFING FELT/SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT OVER ROOF SHEATHING. - METAL PANS WHERE INDICATED SHALL BE FLAT SOLDERED SEAMED COPPER OVER W.R GRACE "ULTRA" SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. IF FIELD SEAMING IS PERFORMED PLACE 2 LAYERS ROOFING FELT UNDER SEAM LOCATIONS TO PROTECT UNDERLAYMENT. - ROOFING FELT SHALL BE UL RATED 30 LB ASPHALT SATURATED ORGANIC FELT. -TYPICAL SELF ADHERED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE W.R. GRACE "ICE AND WATER SHIELD." INSTALL AT FOLLOWING LOCATIONS; 1) ALONG EAVES EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF 36" HORIZONTALLY UP ROOF BEYOND THE INSULATED WALL LINE, 2) 36" SHEET WIDTH ALONG GABLE (RAKE) ENDS, 3) 36" SHEET WIDTH AT VALLEYS, 4) 36" SHEET WIDTH AT ROOF/WALL INTERSECTIONS, 5) ALL AROUND CHIMNES, SKYLIGHTS, AND OTHER ROOF PENETRATIONS, 6) COMPLETELY AT ALL ROOFS LESS THAN 4:12 PITCH, 7) 26: SHEET AT ROOF PITCH TRANSITIONS, 8) OTHER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY CODE - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL DRIP FLASHING ALONG ALL EAVES AND RAKE ENDS TO HAVE MINIMUM 6" FLANGE ONTO ROOF SURFACE. - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL VALLEY FLASHING WITH 1" V -CRIMP, 12" MINIMUM UP EACH SIDE OF VALLEYS OR WEAVE SHINGLES AT VALLEYS. INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING AT ROOF PITCH TRANSITIONS - INSTALL PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING ALONG ROOF/WALL INTERSECTIONS AND ALONG ROOF/CHIMNEY INTERSECTIONS. - CONFORM WITH "SMACNA" ARCHITECTURAL SHEET METAL MANUAL, LATEST EDITION FOR ALL METAL ROOFING, FLASHING, AND ROOF PENETRATION SYSTEMS. - RIDGE VENTS TO BE HIGH PROFILE, PLASTIC TYPE, SHINGLE OVER VENT SYSTEM (COR -A -VENT V-600 SERIES OR EQUAL). INSTALL CONTINUOUSLY ALONG RIDGES. - INSTALL ROOF TO WALL VENTS (COR -A -VENT ROOF -2 -WALL VENT OR EQUAL) WHERE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. - NOT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS ARE INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. COORDINATE FLUES, DRYER VENTS, PLUMBING STACKS, ETC. AND PROVIDE ACCESSORIES AND INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED. ALL PENETRATIONS SHOULD BE PLACED ON REAR SIDE OF ROOF IF POSSIBLE. REVIEW ALL PENETRATION LOCATIONS IN FIELD WITH OWNER. IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS: 1. THESE DRAWINGS ARE DESIGN DRAWINGS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HAS THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO REVISE CONFIGURATIONS AND DETAILS DEPICTED IN THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN DRAWINGS, AS REQUIRED, TO PROPERLY CONSTRUCT A TECHNICALLY SOUND PROJECT. 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT WHEN DEVIATING FROM THE DESIGN INTENT. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL COVENANTS, ZONING, BUILDING, FIRE, HEATING, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. *PROVIDE SELF SEALING ASPHALT MEMBRANE (ICE SHIELD) AT ALL VALLEYS SELF SEALING ASPHALT MEMBRANE \ (ICE SHIELD) -FIRST (2)ROWS 15 LB. ASPHALT ROOFING FELT ASPHALT SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED 9" SHINGLE STARTER PREFINISHED METAL EDGE DETAIL AT TYPICAL ROOF EDGE 1 /2II _ v_0lI © 2023 Windmills, Dssign Studio. Rep,od"dion solely by Windmillo, Design Studio. 952.250.1941 W INDMILLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Lu �10 Ln ^ co VLn Ln \ Z 1� \ O C= 0 '^) V O Y N i I..L V) 4J J Ln U Ln NM ERRORS OS OMISSIONS, RESIGN STUGIO, LLC, ASSUMES NO RE-SIBILIiY FOR rvS.— H DIO Sw ErvEREMUST o GRED ALLNOTEs. EAI LS,AryELEVATIONS, SECTIONS All seROCONR nory_OR TO THE START OF CON- I. ISSUE DATE FARWRAWA BUILDING DETAILS City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 565 Leaf Street (our survey 200383) y� Prepared by: Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Date: 4/10/2023 t�kESliO�'�� Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720) S. F. A House 2,880 S. F. B Bituminous 8,982 S. F. C Concrete surfaces 2,247 S. F. D Stone Surfaces 428 S. F. E Porch 177 S. F. F Ret. Walls 805 S. F. G Garage 200 S. F. H Pavers 597 S. F. I Pool 696 S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. Y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 17,012 S. F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Ret. Walls 805 S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 805 S. F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover 16,207 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 87,123 S. F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)] 18.60% ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 5A,o-rn, L M. Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720) S. F. A House 2,880 S.F. B Bituminous 8,982 S. F. C Concrete surfaces 2,247 S. F. D Stone Surfaces 360 S. F. E Porch 177 S. F. F Ret. Walls 805 S. F. G Garage 990 S. F. H Pavers 597 S. F. I Pool 696 S. F. J Garage Porch 121 S. F. K Garage Driveway 420 S. F. L Garage Walk 50 S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Pro osed Hardcover 18,325 S. F.. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Ret. Walls 805 S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 805 S. F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 17,520 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 87,123 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)] 20.11% ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we)J%-lk4T4-n of 1525 LIAg —s kt [ r' name(s)] [print address) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1566 S VL -EJ also referred to as Land Use Application No. (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, i (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. '�17If�1//117 Property Owner Date I (we) If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 clays prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the im: -ovement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form - January 2023 RUN DATE: 05/11/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 04-117-23 32 0007 38 05-117-23 410024 C C KELLEY & C KELLEY CORNELIA D KLITZKE TRUST 3190 SUSSEX RD 555 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHRISTOPHER C KELLEY CORNELIA D KLITZKE COURTNEY KELLEY 555 OXFORD RD 3190 SUSSEX RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 32 0012 38 05-117-23 410026 T M EBERHARDT/L A EBERHARDT MARK BERKEN & NADIA YAYITRA 525 SUSSEX CIR 550 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TODD & LESLIE EBERHARDT MAXXR R MCCARTHY JR 525 SUSSEX CIR 686 FERNDALE RD W LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 32 0013 38 05-117-23 410027 T R STEVENSON/M L STEVENSON SF REAL ESTATE LLC 575 SUSSEX CIR 580 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TIM R & MARTHA L STEVENSON SF REAL ESTATE LLC 575 SUSSEX CIR 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 32 0020 38 05-117-23 410028 J R & R L WHITMAS MICHAEL CLARK & MARCY CLARK 560 SUSSEX CIR 565 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JAMES & RENATE WHITMAS MICHAEL CLARK & MARCY CLARK 560 SUSSEX CIR 565 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 33 0010 38 05-117-23 410029 DAVAD A MAASS TRUST RESTMT KAREN K W BECKER TR 3175 FOX ST 575 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID & ANN MAASS KAREN K WAKE BECKER ET AL P O BOX 392 575 OXFORD ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 33 0011 38 05-117-23 44 0003 NADA FAMILY TRUST WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3125 FOX ST 3300 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 HANY NADA WILLIAM L TRUBECK MARY NADA 3300 FOX ST 401 YALE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 MENLO PARK CA 94025 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410011 38 05-117-23 44 0006 ARMAND FAMILY TRUST SF REAL ESTATE LLC 495 OXFORD RD 3295 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ANTHONY E ARMAND SF REAL ESTATE LLC SHANNON M ARMAND 3345 FOX ST 495 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410015 38 05-117-23 44 0007 A J & S K NELSON SF REAL ESTATE LLC 500 OXFORD RD 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ALBIN J & SUSAN K NELSON SF REAL ESTATE LLC 500 OXFORD RD C/O MARCEL SMITS ORONO MN 55356 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410019 38 05-117-23 44 0010 W & G KORONKIEWICZ JR SF REAL ESTATE LLC ET AL 465 LEAF ST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 WALTER J KORONKIEWICZ SF REAL ESTATE LLC 465 LEAF ST C/O MARCEL SMITS P O BOX 377 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410020 38 05-117-23 44 0011 TRUE VICTORY CHRISTIAN FLWSP K D RUDOLPH & J M RUDOLPH 525 LEAF ST 3280 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TRUE VICTORY CHRISTIAN FLWSP KYLE DANIEL RUDOLPH 525 LEAF ST JORDAN MICHELLE RUDOLPH LONG LAKE MN 55356 3280 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0012 MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 3250 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 3250 FOX ST P O BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0013 MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 3200 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 3250 FOX ST P O BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/11/2023 stliake-9.t ,j _Baas 1rle Ind sJn m Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 565 Leaf St This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 05/15/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/19/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/18/2023 To: Chair Bolis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: June 20, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000023, Bob Renaud with Minnesota Green o/b/o Brent Longval, 1856 Shadywood Road - Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a lake setback variance in order to reconstruct a retaining wall in the lake yard with different wall materials. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The subject property has an existing, aging timber wall supporting an oak tree within the 75 -foot lake setback. This tree is located along the property line between the subject property and the neighbor to the south, 1860 Shadywood Road. The timber wall is failing due to rot and the applicant has proposed a new boulder wall in a similar footprint and height in order to continue supporting the large tree. Due to the change in wall materials the wall is not an in-kind replacement a setback variance is required. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the failing retaining wall and protection of the existing tree as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds the existing condition of the retaining walls as practical difficulties which support the variance request. The new retaining walls would support and protect the existing tree serving both the subject property and the neighboring property. Vegetative screening should be provided to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake. Additionally, due to the location of the wall written permission from the abutting property owner must be submitted with the permit if any construction or grading work is outside of the property boundaries. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-1279 — Setbacks: The existing timber retaining walls support a large oak tree along the southern property line. The wall is located approximately 8 feet from the OHWL and roughly 3 feet tall. The proposed retaining wall replacement will consist of boulder outcrop walls and will be in a similar location, maintaining the approximate 8 -foot setback from the OHWL. No retaining walls are permitted FILE #LA23-000023 June 20, 2023 Page 2 of 4 within the 75 -foot lakeshore setback and therefore a setback is required. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Retaining walls are exempt from hardcover totals for the property. Retaining walls are excluded from the hardcover calculations. Applicable Regulations: Lake Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) Retaining walls are not permitted within 75 feet of the lake, in order to replace the existing wall system, with a slightly expanded footprint and a different material a setback variance has been requested. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Preserving and protecting existing trees in the lake yard is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed retaining walls will continue to maintain the integrity of the slope and protect the existing tree. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The owner proposes to install retaining wall improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The owner has proposed retaining walls to protect the existing tree. The existing failing walls are not the result of actions by the owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are existing retaining walls in the lake yard. The variance to permit the expanded retaining wall structure within the 75 -foot lake setback will preserve the existing tree and character of the area. FILE #LA23-000023 June 20, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are permitted to support a residential use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The slope of the property combined and condition of the existing improvements are unique conditions affecting the subject property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The failing timber wall configuration, and the existing tree create conditions which do not apply to all of the adjacent properties. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a setback variance to allow the retaining walls within the 75 -foot lake setback to be reconstructed with an expanded footprint is reasonable, is a better solution long-term, and is necessary to preserve the rights of the owner and neighboring property. The variance is supported by practical difficulty. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the lake yard setback variance allowing the retaining walls within the 75 -foot lake setback will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The proposed walls within the lake yard will continue to preserve the integrity of the slope and existing tree. Preserving the existing tree is necessary and not merely a convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments A neighbor acknowledgement form has been submitted from the neighbor to the south at 1860 Shadywood Road in support of the project. No other public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the FILE #LA23-000023 June 20, 2023 Page 4 of 4 property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the lake setback variance for the improvements as proposed with the following conditions: 1. Additional screening of the walls be implemented to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake where feasible. 2. All work must be contained to within the subject property. Permission must be submitted with the permit from the abutting property owners if any construction or grading work is proposed outside of the property boundary. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Survey Exhibit E. Neighbor Acknowledgment Form Exhibit F. Address List & Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/15/2023 Address: 1856 Shadywood RD Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1711723240017 Land Use Number: LA23-000023 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: WOODDALE HOMES LLC Address: Brent Longval Applicant: Name: Bob Renaud Company: Minnesota Green Address: 327 Marschall Road Shakopee, MN 55379 bobr@mngreen.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Brent Longval brent.longval@gmaii.com Associated Contact: WOODDALE HOMES LLC Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Replace failing small timber wall by Lake Minnetonka. Required to Save a Tree Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application U Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception _. Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000023 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes. This work is being done to save an large tree 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes. This was an issue that was caused before the current homeowner bought the property. Debris had been dumped in the area for years and the contributed to wall failure 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: No. There was an existing wall prior to this request 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: No. This I primarily about saving a tree S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response:N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The only goal of this project is to preserve a tree 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response:N/A B. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: This particular project exists only to save the tree. This project is near the shoreline, however, this area will not be affected 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes. Primarily to save an existing tree 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response:No 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes. This will save a tree Minnesota en PROJECT NARRATIVE - 1856 SHADYWOOD RD To Whom It May Concern, We are proposing this Variance Request in order to same an existing Oak Tree on the Shoreline. Currently, there is a failing timber wall that has rotted due to debris being collected in the area by the previous horneowners. 'kA in order to rernedy this and save this tree, we are proposing to add a new buuIder outcrop wall, Though walls are not permitted in the area, we are asking duL, to these special circumstances- ]. The failing wall was only discovered after the current homeowner started construction. 2. In working with the Neighbor, both parkies decided that they would Eike to save this tree, 3. Construction will be minimal and will not benefit either homeowner in any way, apart from saving a tree - Thank you for your consideration of this project) BW9Lud--- PrPS%d0hJ10 w;1$r n- 931.5 � v Failu andh actio 931.5 931.5 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM PC Exhibit D DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 26 and the Northerly 15 feet of Lot 27, SHADY WOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 1856 Shadywood Road, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0303F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 23,247 s.f. +/- - 0.533 acres +/- 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on TNH @ Lots 24 & 25, SHADY WOOD = 946.30 Feet. 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (One Family Lakeshore Residential- 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 30 feet (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet/Average LakesoreSetback (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 75 feet (Lake Side- From Ordinary High Water Line) Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject properly we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 8) Builder to verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. Existine Elevations Garage Floor Elevation = 944.3 952.97 before disturbing any vegetation rnspecrrons ana repairs prerormea. Lookout Opening Elevation = 953.6 953.20 FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCTCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DM AK 1 JRS 5/12/2022 ADDED DUPLICATE SILT FENCE & CONC. WASHOUT DRAWN 2 JRS 6/24/2022 ADDED EROSION CONTROL INFO Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 943.6 951.85 OS #10= 951.14 EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Dated this 11th day of May, 2022. Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 Schmidt@sathre.com JPR 3 JRS 8/10/2022 HOUSE STAKED IN FIELD (DR) CHECKED DLS DATE 6/21/21 931.5 931.5 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM PC Exhibit D DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 26 and the Northerly 15 feet of Lot 27, SHADY WOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 1856 Shadywood Road, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0303F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 23,247 s.f. +/- - 0.533 acres +/- 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on TNH @ Lots 24 & 25, SHADY WOOD = 946.30 Feet. 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (One Family Lakeshore Residential- 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 30 feet (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet/Average LakesoreSetback (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 75 feet (Lake Side- From Ordinary High Water Line) Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject properly we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 8) Builder to verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. Existine Elevations Garage Floor Elevation = 944.3 952.97 First Floor Elevation = 954.3 951.23 Lookout Opening Elevation = 953.6 953.20 Walkout Floor Elevation = 950.8 950.09 Proposed Elevations - FB - 10' Poured Basement Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 953.0 Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 953.3 Proposed First Floor Elevation = 954.0 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 943.6 Offset Irons (elevations are to the top of pipe) OS #1= 952.97 OS #6= 951.23 OS #2= 953.20 OS #7= 950.09 OS #3= 953.08 OS #8= 951.63 OS #4= 953.74 OS #9= 952.44 OS #5= 951.85 OS #10= 951.14 Cut/Fill Report 2d Area (Sq. Ft.) Cut Cu. Yd. Fill C( u. Yd.) Net Cu. Yd. Volume Summary O Vw cC--) POWER POLE Comparison Surfaces FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G Existing Grade / Proposed Basement 858.59 317.00 0.00 317.00 <Cut> Existing Grade / Proposed Garage 1077.38 45.05 0.00 45.05 <Cut> Existing Grade / Proposed Porch 121.56 46.52 0.00 46.52 <Cut> Existing Grade / Proposed Upper Patio 320.91 1.28 9.96 8.68 <Fill> Existing Grade / Proposed Lower Patio 219.66 16.57 0.00 16.57 <Cut> Existing Grade / Proposed (Finished) Grade 11,093.70 240.07 83.90 156.17 <Cut> BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® Totals CTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® 2d Area (Sq. Ft. Cut C( u. Yd.) Fill Cu. Yd. Net Cu. Yd. SURVEY CONTROL POINT a FLARED END SECTION -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A Totals 13,691.80 666.49 93.85 f 572.64 <Cut> 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET tx,ORI Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION O Vw cC--) POWER POLE N a S LLHERrq�� PT FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G /� DR. GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN �Ii N O X Wear cow, �, Ro. \il 0 A,m na x TI I Rz aw Boh P+.. 9 n s Crystal FLSI L\ I T Y Sa��� LOWEST OPENING ELEV. as euoDC JL4 CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND e C CONCRETE 51 ao TACO � HER emu°T° REBAR MONUMENT FOUND A SANITARY CLEANOUT SPRING�� SPRING1[�Ad81'� 'EF (sl ��TN. RD. `SOAVE. VE _� 4\i RAVE 1 rarsTnR .�1F p P E STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET tx,ORI Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION O IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cC--) POWER POLE FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET FLSI LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND e SANITARY MANHOLE CONCRETE REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT BITUMINOUS p PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB SURVEY CONTROL POINT a FLARED END SECTION -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -0-0-0-0-0- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER (D TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE m ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND % YARD LIGHT Q) UTILITY MANHOLE GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND 3 LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL oHu OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE Q UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP © WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE ® WATER METER -> STORM SEWER rP FUEL PUMP c03 WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FT FUEL TANK QQ WELL RETAINING WALL FP_T1 PROPANE TANK Mw MONITORING WELL uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP I WATERMAIN GAS VALVE D4 GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL © GAS MANHOLE '1--e HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS cE GENERATOR RE IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL ® GUARD POST Pry POST INDICATOR VALVE 0- RAILROAD SWITCH D HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.17 FILE NO. Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 9745-107 O RO N O , PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA WOODDALE BUILDERS 17 940.7 X 937.9 X FN D I P I/2" 941.1 410 5 gUo CA 940. X �� 0.0 wompow swoop swoop -Nor 0) 3.5 /9� � I I X R ET S L-0 A LL � ,�_,- I�A 00� i z f I N 41.8 �� 0-� 00N `n0 41.9 x 0-� OB c� 935.8 x I ° Notes 1. WALLS 5' FROM O.H.W. LINE 2. EXSITING OAK TREE 3. ADJUST GRADE OUT MINIMAL AMOUNT 4. ORDINARY HIGH WATERLINE 929.2 929.1 929.2 929.2 929.2 929.2 929.2 929.2 929.2 1--rr3 Qo CD X"933.9 �,, 9 4 0. 7 9`392 `V o�cb 41. 9 941.0 CA p00 � W --�\ X � � X'0� 941.5 AL�L��, . . . . . . . . ....942.9 941.8 1 0. 3 -g40.8� 929. 34..4 942.6 _ 941.9 941.6 41. 8 FN D CI 942.6 941.6Ln94L� a c� ` TOW 937-50' 000-� I � BOW 93.0' 1 � E02 J J 1 1� DOCK BOULDER OUTCROPS N m LONGVAL RESIDENCE VARIANCE REQUEST PLAN 1 00p Q>� w >N� m o o z N= 0 N _ cn �(_0 w N 1856 SHADYWOOD RD a N LL -1 a � Z 0 (n Ile M cu � m +I II D JAW wLi-1 w wQ� JUS O I� � BOULDER OUTCROPS REMOVE TIMBERS me F T m LONGVAL RESIDENCE VARIANCE REQUEST PLAN 1 00p Q>� 1 Z LL- 0 N z - 7 TOM REMOVE TIMBERS me F T m LONGVAL RESIDENCE VARIANCE REQUEST PLAN 1 00p o UGl P � cqrD N N z - 7 TOM N 1856 SHADYWOOD RD a TIIIIIIIIIII` ORONO, MN 55392Lo 0 (n Ile M cu � m I(we) ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM print names)) have reviewed the 161 1P - ---, ---j plans for the proposed improvement or proposed also referred to as hand Use Ar)Dllcation No. use of the property located at I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. t Property Owner Properry'CYwner &S Date Date I If you hive any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting dale. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we) of [print names}] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or also referred to as Land Use Application proposed No. use of the property located at 1 (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that i (we) am (are) aware of the +rriNrovemerlt pians and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property owner date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Applicatio n, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Fora - January 2023 RUN DATE: 05/15/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 17-117-23 210007 38 17-117-23 24 0006 38 17-117-23 24 0017 CITY OF ORONO S W & K M HUTTON JOSEPH BRENT LONGVAL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1835 SHADYWOOD RD 1856 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO SCOTT W HUTTON JOSEPH BRENT LONGVAL P O BOX 66 1835 SHADYWOOD RD 20550 PARKVIEW LANE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 38 17-117-23 210008 38 17-117-23 24 0007 38 17-117-23 24 0018 MICHAELA DIERCKS JOHN O MOTZKO W R& R T OMLIE 1795 SHADYWOOD RD 1855 SHADYWOOD RD 1860 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAELA DIERCKS JOHN O MOTZKO WILLIAM & RHONDA OMLIE 1795 SHADYWOOD RD 1855 SHADYWOOD RD 1860 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 210022 38 17-117-23 24 0009 38 17-117-23 24 0019 DAVID H EISS M J KOSEK & G FINK KOSEK MICHAEL D LUNDBERG 1760 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1890 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID H EISS MARK KOSEK & GINA FINK KOSEK MICHAEL LUNDBERG 1760 SHADYWOOD RD 1875 SHADYWOOD RD 1890 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 210023 38 17-117-23 24 0010 38 17-117-23 24 0020 DANIEL P O'DONOGHUE ET AL M J KOSEK & G FINK KOSEK MEGAN TULLY MCMANUS 1770 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1910 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL P O'DONOGHUE MARK KOSEK & GINA FINK KOSEK MEGAN TULLY MCMANUS 1770 SHADYWOOD RD 1875 SHADYWOOD RD 1910 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 210024 38 17-117-23 24 0011 38 17-117-23 24 0021 JON WESSLING & ERIN WESSLING M J KOSEK & G FINK KOSEK J & B L GASTERLAND 1780 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1920 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 JON WESSLING MARK KOSEK & GINA FINK KOSEK JAN P GASTERLAND ERIN M WESSLING 1875 SHADYWOOD RD 1133 THORN ST 1682 INDEPENDENCE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PAUL MN 55106 GLENVIEW IL 60026 38 17-117-23 210025 38 17-117-23 24 0012 38 17-117-23 24 0029 SHADYWOOD 17 LLC M J KOSEK & G FINK KOSEK M J KOSEK & G FINK KOSEK 1790 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1875 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 SHADYWOOD 17 LLC MARK KOSEK & GINA FINK KOSEK MARK J KOSEK 13385 24TH ST N 1875 SHADYWOOD RD GINA FINK KOSEK STILLWATER MN 55082 WAYZATA MN 55391 1875 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 210026 38 17-117-23 24 0013 DOUGLAS R SEABOLT REV TRUST MARK J KOSEK 1800 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 DOUGLAS R SEABOLT MARK J KOSEK 1800 SHADYWOOD RD 1875 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 210027 CHAD J RICHARDSON ET AL 1810 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 CHAD J RICHARDSON 1810 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0001 RARUUD&SLRUUD 1825 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 RONALD A & SABRINA L RUUD 1825 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0004 W R OMLIE & R T OMLIE 1880 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM R & RHONDA T OMLIE 1860 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0014 GABRIEL JABBOUR REV TRUST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 GABRIEL JABBOUR 220 TONKA BAY RD TONKA BAY MN 55331 38 17-117-23 24 0015 B A SKJERPING & L S CAIN 1820 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 BRUCE A SKJERPING 1820 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0016 S A ERICKSON/I G ERICKSON 1840 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 SCOTT ERICKSON 1840 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/15/2023 — — 11720 I?5 ;a, 9744 CM1 1750 pt} t� mom, 1TSQ as RI 175C. 17'95 1600 1614 pP} %25 n} 9824 1815 rl. 1955 1856 l Ifi 1Vr 9560 1894 Oa 1910 C6 ,k 19Ci4 � 1940 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 05/16/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/17/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/16/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 20 June 2023 Subject: #LA23-000024, Sarah & Kevin Revering, 1960 Fox Ridge Rd, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a front yard setback variance in order to construct a 14'x25' addition to the existing attached garage. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicants' property is a corner lot situated on Brown Road South and Fox Ridge Road. The shorter frontage is along Brown Road South making Brown the "front" for setback purposes. The existing home is set back 56.9 feet from Brown Road. The applicants have proposed a 14' x 25' garage addition on the Brown Road side. Because the home is angled with respect to the property line, a small portion of the addition will require a front yard setback variance to allow a setback 46 feet from the front property line where a 50 -foot setback is required. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the existing home location, the wetland on the eastern portion of the property and the corner lot configuration as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff agrees that there are site constraints creating difficulties for siting a conforming location for the addition which will also be functional. The wetland, existing septic treatment area, the corner lot orientation, and location/angle of the home are practical difficulties supporting the variance request. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420 — Setbacks: RR -1B Required Existing Proposed Front 50' 56.9' 46' Rear 50' 96' NC Side Street 30' 33.6' NC Side (south lot line) 30' 83' NC Approximately 52 feet as measured 25' or MCWD Wetland by Staff on the Hennepin County NC buffer Aerial Map FILE #LA23-000024 20 June 2023 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-420 — Lot Area/Width: RR -1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 45,141 s.f. (1.0 acre) 185' Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Cove Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 45,141 s.f. (1.0 acre) Allowed: 9,028 s.f. (20%) Existing: ±3,600 s.f. (8%)* Proposed: ±3,950 s.f. (8.7%) *Staff calculated using aerial photo and 1991 survey. Applicable Regulations: Front Yard Setback Variance (City Code Section 78-420) The applicants are proposing a small, 350 square foot garage addition. The garage addition is proposed in a location connecting to the existing, attached garage and will be accessible to the existing driveway. The property was platted in 1962 and predates our current zoning regulations for the area. The property is legally nonconforming with respect to area and width for the RR -1B zoning district. The existing home is angled on the property toward the corner of Brown and Fox Ridge; there is a wetland in the southeast corner of the property and the septic system area limit locations to construct a functional garage addition. The mature screening on the Brown Road side of the property and the driveway and home's orientation to the neighborhood road (Fox Ridge Road) results in Fox Ridge Road being perceived as the front. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed 46 -foot setback for the garage addition is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood as Brown Road functions as a side street. The property has a limited buildable area due to the wetland and substandard size. The requested variance is in FILE #LA23-000024 20 June 2023 Page 3 of 4 harmony with the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The scale and type of variance proposed to construct a garage addition within the front setback does not impact adjacent properties, will be screened by vegetation, and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit a small, approximately 21 square foot portion of the garage addition within the required front setback appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced buildable area and orientation with respect to the roadways creates difficulties. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The home's location and orientation with respect to the wetland, Brown and Fox Run Roads are not the result of the homeowner's actions; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The home addition with a 46 -foot setback from the Brown Road property line will be screened by existing vegetation. The project will not alter the character of the area. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential building improvements are allowed in the RR -1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and buildable area, wetland impacts, septic system location, and existing conditions create difficulties which are particular to the property. The proposed setback is not out of character. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While many of the adjacent properties on Fox Run Road are similarly sized, the property's substandard buildable area, wetland impacts, orientation as a corner lot, septic system location, and existing conditions create difficulties which are particular to the property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds that granting the requested variance preserves a substantial property right of the homeowners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff finds this criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting the requested variance will FILE #LA23-000024 20 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 alleviate difficulties due to the property's substandard buildable area, wetland impacts, septic system location, and existing conditions. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Aerial Photos Exhibit F. Septic Information Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map 5/22/23, 2:44 PM Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/16/2023 Address: 1960 Fox Ridge Road Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0311723130011 Land Use Number: LA23-000024 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: KEVIN W REVERING Address: SARAH N REVERING 1960 FOX RIDGE RD Name: Sarah Revering Applicant: Company: Address: 1960 Fox Ridge Rd Orono, MN 55356-9249 sarahrevering@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Sarah Revering sarahrevering@gmall.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Garage addition Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Key n % 4 j Applicant Signature: https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/WorkOrderNotes?Action=goToSelectedFileTab&ciDisplay=none&WorkOrder_ID=86994643 1/1 Revering Variance Application 1960 Fox Ridge Road We are seeking approval for a variance to add a single car garage addition on to our existing garage. This would be located on the West side of our property near Brown Road. The proposed plan asks for a 7 -foot variance exception. This proposal is the least impactful to natural open spaces, maintains tree preservation and adds minimal new hardcover. Additionally, it would blend into the existing look of the principal structure. We have no other location on our property that meets setback requirements for an accessory building due to having a wetland on the East side/interior side of our lot. Kevin & Sarah Revering 5/22/23, 2:45 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000024 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: We intend to use the additional garage space for our vehicle and added storage. We feel the variance is reasonable because it has minimal impact to the natural space of our property based on the proposed footprint and hardcover. Additionally, it maintains the architecture and appearance of the principal building. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: 1. Brown Road is considered the front of our property which has a setback requirement of 50 feet. 2. We have no other location on our property that meets setback requirements for an accessory building due to having a wetland on the East side/interior side of our lot which also requires a setback requirement of 50 feet. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: We believe the resulting structure will not be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Our variance request is not driven by economic factors. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: NA 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Use is for residential purposes of storing vehicle and homeowner possessions. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: NA 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&Work0rder_ID=86994643&ciDisplay=none&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 5/22/23, 2:45 PM Permit List I Citizenserve Response: 1. Brown Road is considered the front of our property which has a setback requirement of 50 feet. 2. The east side/interior side of our lot includes wetland that also requires a setback requirement of 50 feet which would then not allow enough room for an accessory building. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Having Brown Road considered as the front of our property along with a wetland poses unique challenges. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: NA 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Approval of our variance request will not have any negative impact to health, safety, comfort or morals. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: There is no option to expand the principal building or add an accessory building to provide additional garage and store space that does not require a variance. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&Work0rder_ID=86994643&ciDisplay=none&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 RAM R3 --------------------- FRONT ELEVATION 1/4P = 1' -OP SIDE ELEVATION 1/4P = 1' -QP ISSUE MARCH 27. 2023 REVISIONS JOB #232676 SHEET # 2 OF X FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 /4P = 1 `-OP ISSUE MARCH 27. 2023 REVISIONS JOB #232676 SHEET # OF X • � I it �4 ^.y � rill; '� }fix ' ,,• +1 � - r. ��a, � ,:�J <"" �•F''•� • .,.. . Y Ai Sys. .L. OP i ray NOW AN Y - r• �;,�'' : .�'-; -F."•4s' ,,� • 'fir .\ir�.�• s -i} 'S�" � c'':j;,,y ` L.1 ;� �aE.M��. �:��. ;�. •� :�-'''.'mow.•''_• �'.ti: .. � w�' �� 3 -��' a CeR+:a��.: *F - wR++�,. '-. •.r=.t ::s..._a:.r:.,_ :amu. 71r-: .' �r • ._. r a :;i•,� .•.� . _{ } ` w• � moi' r - ¢ - . k '�. � �' �; '`trr Y -19W t vi - 41 •1� 1. �'�`�='�I i N 38 03-117-23 12 0002 38 03-117-23 13 0008 PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC JOHN PAUL GILLE IV P O BOX 5628 SHARON S GILLE/FAUNA GILLE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 1850 FOX RIDGE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 12 0003 38 03-117-23 13 0009 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT RUSTY LINDQUIST TRUSTEE ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN SHANNON LINDQUIST TRUSTEE 500 LAFAYETTE RD 1900 FOX RIDGE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 ORONO MN 55356 38 03-117-23 12 0011 38 03-117-23 13 0010 LUKE WILCOX/MARGARET WILCOX DAVID S & ELLEN D PHELPS 140 BROWN RD S 1950 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 12 0019 38 03-117-23 13 0011 CREEKSIDE IN ORONO HMWR ASSN KEVIN W REVERING C/O ANDREW JOHNSON SARAH N REVERING 110 CREEK RIDGE PASS 1960 FOX RIDGE RD ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0001 38 03-117-23 210009 RICHARD N CHALFEN DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT 350 BROWN RD S ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN LONG LAKE MN 55356 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 03-117-23 13 0002 38 03-117-23 210022 RICHARD N CHALFEN JAMES E & BARBARA A ELDER 350 BROWN RD S 195 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0003 38 03-117-23 24 0008 PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC EMIL MOFFA & LISA SCHIMMENTI P O BOX 5628 255 BROWN RD S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0005 38 03-117-23 24 0009 JAMES R DARRAH BETHANY CULP LINDSAY J DARRAH 265 BROWN RD S 1995 FOX RIDDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0006 38 03-117-23 24 0011 DAVID E & JOANNE M KIRKMAN C STEVEN & SUSAN D WILSON 1945 FOX RIDGE RD 325 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0007 TOBIN J & MAE DAYTON 1800 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 ADJACENT PROP ERTY OWN ERS' AC KN OWLEDG MEW FOM I(We) l L, (,I MV15 N. of fprarft neie)I f 4 [r [print addresal have reviewed Uha res for the proper improvemant cir proposed u5Se Qf thre property-ooated at 1� ca-loca-lor also referred to as Land Lasa Applirtalion No. Id I (we) understand that in a cuunq this ackncwlad jement, I Awa] am (art) trot asked to declare approval or disapproval of the praparly or use but marNV to cor7firm for thv City Council that f (we) ars (are) a -,Hare of the rmpmv+emlarrt pkans. arxt that tha propasbd r1aigh bDrs projert ¢r use rr;quire:� Oouricil approval -. Pruperty Property Owrw DaLe Date 15 If you have any information that may assist the Orty gn the rev*w of thi$ Lurid UtA e= p o° please submit your commants to the Bucle iron a 7 -ming 06M at I k 1 a days pnor to tie sceduled maeting date. �..-`.`.F..-..-. � �.�,+,�...,�.�.. «.+.+.+-.,`�,�,�,.�� � +-.�....�,.�,+,+,.��.�-.-.tet f. � ��,.. tet.. � �,.+•.�.......-. _.-.... AWAC:ENT PROPERTY C*1ANERS' ACK NOWLEVGEMENT FORM il (we) [pqint name(s)] -- [print addrs] h r�+r d th* plow For the prgpased irr pnwement orr prvpased use of the property lor-ted at o alio evWred to as Land tFsa Application 30. (we) uridorst4ir4 that ii1 oxo inn this aCknQwlidgemenl, r (we) am (are' not asked to decaare a pproval im �fi$apprvval of the property or use !;vt merely to confirm for the City Coun6l that I (wee) am (are) aware of the irnproverneni plans a-nd that lhre prapgsed neighbor's profit ar uw regruirw-Cqunluif approval P rt Owner Cate -0t P r ---- - Date If Yft hav-@ any intormabbn Mat ma -0 armi$t the city ii1 the review of this Land Uw +4pplicaMin: plow Aubmit your camrr is to the Suiidirlg &.Zoning Cffre at least 10 dare prkw to the 9ohed-u meef�n!q date A.o}ecent Pmpefly CWner Forrn - dsnumy 2022 I (we AD,,J ACENT PROPERTY OWNERn' ACKNCVh.E DC EMENT FORM 1% 0-� �- D5 [ p n n t (:s ?1 of [print add cess] { have reviewed ft plans for the proper irnprQuement or prWo!ged use of khe lorCgerty at C } 'jbtLzW feferred tp e$ Lead Use AppliCakior1 No. 1 (we) understand that in exedukiryo this 00k nowkedoement, t (we) :0m (pro) rept :a0ked to B lire approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely tp vonfirm fgr the City Council thak I: (we) am (are) aware of the impruvpre-nt is and that the propow�d neightKo r; projector uF;�e requires CQu nQil appruwal. Property Property Cate If you have any in$o"trW that rnnyr asrw t this C itV in tho review of th is Land U&L- A,pp licatior, pwase 5ubmik your Com menus to the Bu illir g SL tonin Off at IeaSk 10 days prior to Iha schMuled rnaMng lobe. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWHERDS' ACKNCtW-LF-VGZMENT FORM I (VM) of (print nanma s)i Wrint address) have reviewed the plans f w the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Appli,; ation No I (ire) understand that in execnng this ackrK wledgement, I (we) am (are) ntxt asked to declare approval' of disapproval of the propert+,r or use but merely to wnfirm for the City Council that 9 (we) am (are) aware of the improvernent pans arrd that the proposed nei!$rl; !a project or ww require6 Cavncil approval. Prop" mourner D.0% Property Qwmer Date If you ho any information that may a5si5t the City in the seview at this Larid U se +4pplica;ion. plea se submit your oamrr+entB to the Building 8� Zoning b!� at Inst 10 dayprkw to the !aeheou led meeting date. Ad;amnt Prope tyr Owner Form - der v 2 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/17/2023 0 L In 195 7i0 9995 tl4 995 � 1$95 ffl i' MI f Rade r 9$so Esso n� zss } 1908 �i 35d Ito E N N E ' Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1960 Fox Ridge Road This data (1) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 05/16/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/16/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/15/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 20 June 2023 Subject: #LA23-000025, Revision LLC o/b/o Peter & Anne Antonenko, 165 Cristofori Circle Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variance approval to permit an oversized accessory building to be located streetward of the home on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background The property is located in Cristofori Woods, a planned residential development (PRD), within the RR - 1A, 5 -acre zoning district (Resolution 3210, attached as Exhibit F). The applicant is proposing to construct an accessory garage with a footprint of 1,467 square feet; this is considered an oversized accessory building ("OAB"). An OAB is defined as an accessory building with a footprint exceeding 1,000 square feet. Only one OAB is permitted on a property. The applicant proposes to construct the new garage 72 feet from the front property line; the home is situated 142 feet from the front property line. Within the RR districts, City Code permits an accessory building to be located streetward of the principal building or the home on the property, meeting the required principal building setback, but the accessory building cannot be an OAB. The PRD requires a 50 -foot setback from the private road outlot, as well as 50 -foot front and rear yard setbacks. Based on its acreage, the property is permitted to have 2,400 square feet total accessory building footprint(s). Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the unique lot (surrounded by the development open space outlot), the location of the existing home, topography, and protection of the trees as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds no practical difficulty exists as the proposed garage footprint can be reduced to 1,000 square feet at the proposed location or the OAB could be sited further north on the property (at an equal setback or behind the existing home) to be conforming. Both of the alternative options outlined by staffed are permitted by City Code and no variance would be required. FILE #LA23-000025 20 June 2023 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-395 — Setbacks: RR -1A / PRD Required per PRD Existing Proposed Front 50' 142' home 72' detached garage Rear 50' 177' home No change West Side 30' 135' home 63' detached garage East Side 30' 68.1' home 183' detached garage The lot area of 2.6 acres is conforming within the PRD as the outlot open spaces make up the difference between the RR -1A district requirements and the approved lot sizes from a density standpoint. The property exceeds 1.99 acres therefore there is no structural coverage limitation. RR -1A Required Lot Area PRD Established Lot Area 217,800 square feet / 5 acres 114,112 square feet /2.6 acre Applicable Regulations: Variance to Permit an CAB Streetward of the Princiaal Building (City Code Section 78-1440) Section 78-1440 states that within RR -1A and RR -113 districts, an accessory building less than 1,000 square feet may be located streetward of the principal building provided principal building setbacks are met; and the accessory building is consistent in design, color and exterior material with the principal building. The applicant is prosing to locate the detached garage approximately 71 feet closer to the front lot line than the home on the property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Construction of an accessory building is consistent with the intent of the Ordinance. However, the size of the building proposed in the location proposed does not meet the intent of the Ordinance. The applicant has alternative solutions and has not demonstrated that their request is in harmony with the Ordinance. This criterion is not met. FILE #LA23-000025 20 June 2023 Page 3 of 4 The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The size of the building proposed in the location shown is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is not met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant's response: "The Accessory structure primary usages to have indoor storage of personal vehicles, snowmobiles, and yard equipment." In the opinion of staff, this criterion has not been met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant's response: "There are a number of unique circumstance to this property that make this request reasonable. 1.) The lot is unique that it boarders one neighbor on all four sides. 2.) The house and location of the garage is done a hill from the street/entrance of the property. You can only see the roof structure on the Main house from the street. 3.) The location proposed minimizes and tree clearing or deforestation of the property. No trees will be impacted with the proposed location. The remaining areas of the lot are heavily wooded." In the opinion of staff this criterion has not been met; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant's response: "Correct, the current lot is mostly wooded area. The location of the structure is in a grassy area that has minimum environmental impact." The applicant's response addresses the character of the subject lot, not the neighborhood/area in general. In the opinion of staff this criterion has not been met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a detached garage is an allowed use in the RR - 1A District / PRD Development. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. No special conditions have been identified which would allow for a larger oversize accessory building in the proposed location than what is permitted. This criterion has not been met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The conditions of the property do apply to the other properties in the district. This criterion is not met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The owners have substantial use of the property without the variance; the variance is not necessary for the preservation of a property right of the applicant. This criterion has not been met. FILE #LA23-000025 20 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variance will not impar health, safety, or comfort or morals; however, approving the variance would be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. There are alternative conforming locations to construct the OAB on the property. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends denial of the application as applied. The applicant should consider relocating the proposed garage to a conforming location or reduce the size of the garage to have a footprint less than 1,000 square foot. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Applicant's Photo Exhibit F. Resolution 3210 Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit 1. Plat Map 5/22/23, 2:42 PM Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary 05/16/2023 165 Cristofori Circle Orono, MN 55359 3111823430014 LA23-000025 Agent on behalf of property owner Name: JOHN LESSER Address: Peter Antonenko Name: Kevin Shultz Applicant: Company: Revision LLC Address: 153 Lake Street E Wayzata, MN 55391 kevin@revisionnm.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: John Daly john@revisiommn.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Front Yard Set back for accessory structure Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: C�6� https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=11767810&WorkOrder_ID=868... 1 /1 165 Cristofori Circle Description of Request: 1. Request of front yard setback on an oversized accessory structure Background/ Current Condition: The property of 165 Cristofori circle is a 2.8 acre property that occupy a single family home. The property is heavily wooded in all surrounding areas of the yard except for a flat cleared yard that exist on the front side of the property. The property is low in elevation to the street down a long driveway. The property was carved out of a development and a majority of the driveway and street are in an easement with the adjoining property owner. That Property Owner owns the land on all 4 sides of the property. Other adjoining properties range from 2-22 acres sites and beyond that are bordered with county land and the Luce Line and City Park/Wooded property. The property itself is private due to the heavily wooded lot and elevation changes of the land from the street. Only the roof lines of the home can be visible from the driveway entrance. On the property there is a clear grass area that is relatively flat in elevation. This is where we are proposing to construct the structure. The intent of the Zoning rule is to minimize the impact of structures from other properties. This property is unique as defined for these reasons. Action for Request: A. Front Yard Setback We are proposing to construct an accessory structure at 165 Cristofori Circle. We are seeking proposal to place it in a flat grass open area on the front side of the property. By placing it here we will not be required to cut down trees and make significant changes to the grading of the existing land that otherwise would done in other locations. With this, the intent of this location is to minimize the environmental impact to the land. This structure has been designed to match to fit and finish details of the existing home and blend in with the primary structure. The use of the structure is to store additional vehicles, lawn equipment, and a small trailer that is currently in the yard and visible. This allows for items to be stored away inside. Due to the circumstance of the change in elevation and heavily wood area around the property we are seeking to request a variance that we find creates the most optimal location for the property, the environment, and other surrounding property owners. Thank you for the time to review our request. 5/22/23, 2:42 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000025 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The the Accessory structures primary usages to have indoor storage of personal vehicles, snowmobiles, and yard equipment. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: There are a number of unique circumstance to this property that make this request reasonable. I 1. The lot is unique that it boarders one neighbor on all four sides. 2. The house and location of the garage is done a hill from the street/entrance of the property. You can only see the roof structure on the Main house from the street. 3. The location proposed minimizes and tree clearing or deforestation of the property. No trees will be impacted with the proposed location. The remaining areas of the lot are heavily wooded. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Correct, the current lot is mostly wooded area. The location of the structure is in a grassy area that has an minimal environmental impact. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: No, We could build the structure in the backyard. The consideration is for environmental reasons and to create enough space to store personal belongings 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Other location of the property are heavily wooded and would require access roads and clearing of old growth trees to construct. This proposed location does not. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: NA 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: NA S. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=86852419&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 5/22/23, 2:42 PM Permit List I Citizenserve property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The property is unique that it is heavily wooded and has a steep done grade slope from the street to the house. There is also on one adjoining property Owner on all four sides. The Main house of that property Owner is roughly 450' away from the proposed structure. The other surrounding properties range from 2 - 22 acres lots. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The conditions of this property are heavily wooded and have a steep slope from the street to the proposed area of the structure. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: NA 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct. The location of the structure does not impair the health, safety. morals and other respects. The location of the structure reduces the environmental impact on the property where otherwise could be located. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The location of the structure alleviates difficulty to adjusting grade, slope, additional hardcover, and removal of old growth trees that otherwise would be needed to place the structure in a location that meets the City Zoning Requirment. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=86852419&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 n LI END IP LEAN S NORTH .92 941.3 5 Cl J \� I� 7� v v %1 I I T I /1 T i� I 1 1 U lJ I IL_ �/ I L< I I � _ I T DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 7 EASEMENT PER PLAT. I Ln I � 1 \ 1 � - \ 1 ase Bim` BSBL SSSL 1 \ \ I BSBL B _B _BsEk m SSL SS&L I \ X9¢2 1 esBL� I 5 �ask I \ I \ BsaL Baer \ / \RSSLe -&S&L asat X T9, 48.9 \ ase`�ese� I \\ I B B im` x 949.8 B I TREE LINE-- x 948.9 x I / x 950.3 \ \ I 50.01- 301 _0`951:83oi-951.301 3N-50.9 x 949.4 \ \ o / 301 x 5935�p512\\.5 �a �11 52.8-953.3 301 \\ 9 949.1 X V- \�5� 950.0SEPTILAREA2 954.4 950.1 54 301 953.3 '94 °1 °1 9543 953 X54.4 195\ 0. 8 \ 04.I \ \9 x952.3301�53.$ 4 �iI \ \ \ \ \ iI \ \ ¢4\ \rA 1\ I \ 101 6'`954.3 I o 953.5953.8 x 953: '° 1 950.1 I \ \ IoI 0� / I I 3p1 �J�4 3 1 /m \ 953.4 I o 951.0 j x 9 8.4 \ I 11 \ x 953. ° _-WI-53.7 / 952.1 953.5 / 04\ 3oi 955.0 0 x 954.5 � 3��3.5 1 � \ \ 48.6 954.4 I 56.1 954.7,: � I \ INV= 1 / x 9555.0 �_ 55.4 �k ASH 1211 I 5 A 8 49.1 10 / 955.7 /V� \ 954.8 \ _7 949.1 �J¢ / X956.9 957.9C' 955.\ I / 957. 957.0 INV 9 \ ,�/ I OAK 8' x 9�.0 .ITAINI 9582 S Q 9 95Q \ 950.5 \ 19.5 _ 956 W- RV 8 \ SQ p x 959.8 0� 958.4 9\s �� 9 gs.0 960 3 � \ � 0�� 6 �S � \ \ 49.7 I x 952 3 / 960.8 961.3 961.4 957 8 U j -----30-- / / 961.8 59.7 P953.0 \ -- x 961.0 _ sem, 952.5 \ 9 OCK�/ / / x 960.4 �� ' 962. 96jS 96 259.7 958.6 952.9 \ I 949.9 6..o- 962.5 962. 959. 959.2 ° \ SC / :.. 959.6 953.0 / / / 6.1..9.::"FE= 952.9 LOT /4 y62.8 952.9 OAK 24" 953.2 L� .8' 1 953.8 953.1 \--- -30- 9 --- i . .................. .... ...... .... ...:...: 953.3 6 8. 80:0-----�------ - - - - - - - I / w 1 0,` - RETAINING \2048" N 3 WALL 1 Q EXISTING i \ HOUSE LOE \ / o 0 5.80 956. 1 96. a m / / W x....9.6 00 o II 'n coy 56.3 L. + :+7+1 10 w `t ------ ---- / o 9 +++ +963..+3 +++ <o / - --- ----�- ----- I ---- ........ :r.. ++ +rn \ I x 525 ---- - 135.5 / ' �'a ¢ 0'yr,+++ 962.4+ 962.4 9s 957.1 \ 961.9 900 658.1 . a ...................� ��96+ +g s J: 96i T 959\.2\ \ / 1 ' .. \g6\ 0 + 9625 #++ 64.0 64.0 96 + 96 9 + 9B� \ \ 953.2 �s�\ \ o.lb '::.:..:.:..: c3 .+ LAIV +S A EIi IC+ 962.6-+++-++ 9 /2 1 6 ..................a 96..V 6 20' 962 9626 +.++-++ + \ / 56 ..:.:. r4: 9E:::::.:... - 961.5 I 959.3 g'j 24....... + + 9�2. Z L \ / 9:6:{::: 9:6:1;:9::..-:'. i i i i i i{ . i :::: 6':.: + J62.5a . -X / I I 96F.8- \::; . 9621 961.1 1 1 i \ _ X:::::::::::::::::^PAVERS 96 761.7::S 6 i 2�62� v I z x 955.1 I / I / I,... 961:9::.:..:.:: �62 9.. 8. G ... J 961 6 961.5 96 .8 962.1 1 9620 ..:.:..: �W .2 61 , 96 8 rn�RETAINING 9 � 62.0 \ Ln T 02 96f 5. 961.5 O . o WALL 1 `LO q� X 6✓:6� o6I96 X11 960.6 WELL I 1 1 96 9fil 7 961.4 \ 7 ( 24i zg96b98 n960^5960.1 I I i 5. /I 2. /� R 0 9:6.1 7 ��ll�� END IP 2° SOUTH 7, EAST .15 941.2 I \ I / i = 114,112 S.F. House Area = 2,845 S.F. Bituminous Area = 5,314 S.F. Concrete Area = 433 S.F. Pavers Area = N S.F. tlj = 513 O Q O Deck Area cn w S.F. W pp = 9,895 2 � O «m =�IL CHISELED Y' MONUMENT SET L Cf) S C LOE Owl oa. CHISELED Y' MONUMENT FOUND z _ A a CONCRETE J a 1r __, V' ,q ,a REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® A BITUMINOUS A Q\w w cn E I I A FND IP 1/2" I I STORM DRAIN 948.5 i DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 1, Block 3, Cristofori Woods, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 165 Cristofori Circle, Orono MN, 55359 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO309F, effective date ofl 1/04/2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Net Area: 114,112 s. f. - 2.62 acres. *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: STUBBS which has an elevation of 933.12 feet (NAVD88). 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is PRD (Planned Residential Development) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 50 feet (Cristofori Circle) Side: 30 feet Rear: 50 feet Height: 30 feet Hardcover: exempt from hardcover setbacks *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 20th day of June, 2022. &�l 4,1Zv �, Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 schmidt@sathre.com ExistinLy Hardcover Lot Area = 114,112 S.F. House Area = 2,845 S.F. Bituminous Area = 5,314 S.F. Concrete Area = 433 S.F. Pavers Area = 304 S.F. Retaining Wall = 513 S.F. Deck Area = 486 S.F. Total Area = 9,895 S.F. Coverage = 8.67 % PrODOsed Hardcover Lot Area = 114,112 S.F. House Area = 2,845 S.F. Proposed Garage = 1,272 S.F. Bituminous Area = 6,842 S.F. Concrete Area = 433 S.F. Pavers Area = 304 S.F. Retaining Wall = 513 S.F. Deck Area = 486 S.F. Total Area = 12,695 S.F. Coverage = 11.13 % n L1 I fr\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND Q CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE olf • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET c -Q, POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION a=l=• P, IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND V N GFE =� )1( DRILL HOLE FOUND N O TOF SITE + ¢ «m =�IL CHISELED Y' MONUMENT SET T S C LOE --L8. o'a.9oE Vg� oa. CHISELED Y' MONUMENT FOUND M A a CONCRETE J a 1r __, V' ,q ,a REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® A BITUMINOUS A PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE E BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN cTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC 0 CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB n L1 I fr\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND Q CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET c -Q, POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION )1( DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED Y' MONUMENT SET LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED Y' MONUMENT FOUND QS SANITARY MANHOLE a CONCRETE # REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT BITUMINOUS A PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN cTv CABLE TV ® PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC 0 CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB A SURVEY CONTROL POINT 4 FLARED END SECTION -960 - CONTOUR EXISTING Al A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -0-0-0-0-0- GUARD RAIL 0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED Esc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE ■ ELECTRIC OUTLET 0 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND U YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY ® FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE 0 UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP QW WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE • WATER METER ,> STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ❑D FUEL TANK WELL RETAINING WALL Pr PROPANE TANK MONITORING WELL UTA UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER O CURB STOP I WATERMAIN �Q GAS VALVE D4 GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS MANHOLE � HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATOR F,Rv IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Plv POST INDICATOR VALVE C~ RAILROAD SWITCH 0 HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX sa SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. �FtS SU SAT H R E \�� " �I, 2 '" iBERGQUIST W j i - INC. N 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120MINNESOTA CtiFRs P �PPLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 WW.SATHRE.COM TWP:118-RGE.23-SEC.31 Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PREPARED FOR: PETER & ANNE ANTONENKO FILE NO. 10040-002 DM/JS 1 EMW 11/3/2022 GARAGE PLACEMENT, CONTOURS DRAWN O RO N O, EMW CHECKED DLT DATE 06/16/2022 DRAWING KEY: STUD WALL - FOUNDATION WALL 0 2'-0" 16411 1' 11" 121-211 1' 11 1641' M.O. T-81/2" 4'-51/2" 9 It Q M a O O F— LJ 0 o N O O O W W V Z W N 0 N NI VE UNEXCAVATED oL 1'C TING O FFF7fF O cV 2" STONE LEDGE 3-5" 9'-2" 3'-5'1 1'-111' 121-211 1'-111' 3-5" 91211 31-511 M.O. M.O. M.O. 48'-0" 1 Foundation Plan Al .0 3/16" = l'-0" 8 2023-FKrBiller Design Studio. Reproduction solely by W."dTiller Design Stodio. 952.250.1941 W INDMI IERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM Lu 0 - Ln U co Ln ZLn Lu Z ^ 0 v / Z Lu O 0 0- U Z OLJJ Z O 0 Lr) U Z Ln Q �o NOTE: ASSUMES NO RESPONSIB"' FOR STRUCTURALORDIMENSIONAL ERRORSOROMISSIONSTHEWORKNIANSHIPOFTH. SUB CO TRACTORS. THEE CONTRACTORAND/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK AlOTES, ANY E ORS OR OMISSIONS FOR F F POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO THE START OF CONETRUCRON. ISSUE DATE A1.0 FOUNDATION PLAN 16'-0" CONCRETE PAD Q 101 011 61-011 0 �rT 16'-0" 12'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR o YVV 16'-0" UP W 4 0' o F o 0 o x = w --- `�"-------- e o < 7 PGARAGE---------------o0 N 3 M I a I 9'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR 16'-0" Main Level Plan 3/1611 = 11-011 12'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR 16'-011 484" CONC. PAD 9'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR 16411 0 cV ® 2023 WRdmill., Design Studio. Repmd.d,, solely by Windmill., Design Studio. </"\\\V\\, 952.250.1941 W INDMI iLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM w o- U co Ln ZLn w z o� O z Lu O O O� V Z OW Z O OLr) � V Z Ln NOTE: sTRUCTU ALOR DIMENCIONALH ERRORCOROMISSIONS. WINEW L" DE SIGON S1UDI0, LLC. CONTRACTOR a�N oroaowNEt.JST VERI-D CHECK ALL NOTES, ETa,s. ELEvnTaNs, sEcrloNs ........ C.EDCTT ON 111HOb To THE ET of CONS CFON. ISSUE DATE 9.9.22 2.17.23 3.10.23 A1.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN I I I I 12 12 D 12 2 D 6„ 5/4 X 8 FRI ZE BOARD 6„ TOP OF PLATE @ BUMP OUT 12 SIDING NOTES: JJ -HARDIE SHAKES -HARDIE LAP SIDING (REVEAL TO MATCH HOUSE) ®I -2" NATURAL STONE VENEER W/ 3" LIMESTONE CAP -WINDOW & DOOR TRIM TO MATCH HOUSE I co c I M E� CV TOP OF BLOCK I I 1 Exterior Elevation - Front A2.0 3/16" = l'-0" 92023 Windmiller Design Studio. Reproduction solely by Windmiller Design Sto, io. 952.250.1941 W INDMI LLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W O- U cy) z L" w z ft -m IN cn z Lu O jn::� CI O 0� U z O w IL Z 0 O ` CIIU Z L -n Q �o NOTE: OESION SNO10, LLC. ASSUMES NORIRIurvEOR STRUCTURALOR ORNIMPDIMENSIONAL LIC ASSUWKNrvSwPIOTHE EOR SEUB CONTRACTORS. CONTRACTORANDABROWNERMUST AND WINDM 000ESIT ST ID LLC. OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE Co IIREIT To THE START 0, ON=R ON ISSUE DATE Y.Y.22 2.17.23 3.10.23 A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - FRONT Exterior Elevation - Side 3/16" = l'-0" 92023 Wiedmiller Design Studio. .".,Rc.R solely by Windmiller Design St io. 95 250.1941 W INDMI LLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W 0 - Ln Um Z L -n Ln w Z ft -M W U Z n, O w LL. Z 0 0 U-) U Z L -n Q � NOTE: ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBNTY FOR STRUCTURALOROIMENSIONAL ERRORSOROMISSIONS. SUB CO TRACTORS. THE CONIRACTORANFAB-NR MUST AND WINEM L"'ODESION STUDIO- OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE CORECTION PRIOR TO THE START OF —STH—N ISSUE DATE Y.Y.22 2.17.23 3.10.23 A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SIDE I 12 �12 CEILING HT. s" KNEE WALL HT. 0 v 6 _ _ TOP OF SUB FLOOR 12112 _ _ _ TOP OF PLATE 6" SIDING NOTES: 6„ -HARDIE SHAKES -HARDIE LAP SIDING (REVEAL TO MATCH HOUSE) -2" NATURAL STONE VENEER W/ 3" LIMESTONE CAP -WINDOW & DOOR TRIM TO MATCH HOUSE 0 TOP OF BLOCK I 1 Exterior Elevation - Side A2.2 3/16" = l'-0" 92023Windmiller Design Studio. Wi Reproduction solely by ndmiller Design $Ndio. 952.250.1941 W INDMI LLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM ft -m X cn Z Lu O jn::� C,:� O O� U z O W LL Z O ` O U Z L -n NOTE: OESiON SNOiO LLC. ASSUMESNO RESPON EOR STRUCTURALOR OIMENSiONAL OR SEORKMANSHiPOFTHE WUB CONTRACTORS. TH CoMRACTOR AREAS, OWNEF MUST VERIFY D CHECK A-1- NOTES —ORESIT s 10 ITO OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR PoEEIRLF CORREOF NPRIORTO THE START .1 CONRTRNCT.N ISSUE DATE Y.Y.22 2.17.23 3.10.23 A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIDE 12 �12 6 12 6„ 5/4 X 8 FRIEZE BOARD 6,I 12 2 TOP OF PLATE @ BUMP OUT SIDING NOTES: -HARDIE SHAKES -HARDIE LAP SIDING (REVEALTO MATCH HOUSE) -2" NATURAL STONE VENEER W/ 3" LIMESTONE CAP -WINDOW &DOOR TRIM TO MATCH HOUSE m m R M E� CV TOP OF BLOCK 1 Exterior Elevation - Rear A2.3 3/16" = l'-0" 92023 Windmiller Design Studio. Reproduction solely by W.nd ller Design Stodio. 952.250.1941 W INDMI LLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W 0� Ln Uco z Ln Ln w Z C) :�E W cn z Lu O CI,� CI O O� U z O W L.L. z O ` O � U ZCII L.n NOTE, ASSUMES NO RESPONSISo"I EOR STRUCTURALORDIMENS,ONAL ERORRSOROMISSIONS. S-0 T'TRACTaas.iH E CONTRACTORAN-FORV EIRMUST VERIPYAND CHECK ALL NOTESAN', o—NSCmDI uc. of ERRORS OR OM,SsioNs FOR POR3 EI CORE—ON PRIOR To ISSUE DATE Y.Y.22 2.17.23 3.10.23 A2.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -REAR I I 12 CEILING_HT. 12D STO GE STORAGE TRUS ES BY SUPPLIER UNFI ISHED TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD SUEELOOR GLUED & -ASPHALT SHINGLES TO BE SELECTED BY SCREWED TO ENGINE EKED ATTIC TRUSSES OWNER (VE IFY) -ICE & WATER SHIELD, 100% COVERAGE ON KNEE WALL HT. °�' VERIFYSPACING /TRUSSSUPPLIER LOWER 6FT. -30# FELTS LAPPED OVER ALL CONTINUOUS METAL FLASHING -1/2" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD o -CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT AT RIDGE -SOFFIT VENTS AS REQUIRED TOP OF SUB FLOOR TOP OF PLATE TOP OF PLATE TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION AT GARAGE: -CEDAR SHAKE SIDING -BUILDING PAPER -1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING -2"x6" WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. T -FIBERGLASS BATT INSUL (MIN. R-21) (OPTIONAL) -6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER GA GE `fl -5/8" FIRE RATED INTERIOR GYP. BOARD AT CEILING 4" CONCR TE FLOOR -1/2" GYP. BOARD AT WALLS. MUD, TAPE AND SAND SMOOTH b SLOPED TO O.H. DOOR FIRE ODE SHEE R CK ALL COMMON V�ALLS&CE RIG II --------------------- BLOCK ------------------- BLOCK I 4"CONC ETE SLAB 's 2" RIGID SULATION s 0 v I TOP OF FOOTING I 1 Building Section A3.0 3/16" = l'-0" 92023 Windmiller Design Studio. Reproduction solely by W.n I,, ller Design Stodio. 952.250.1941 W INDMI LLERDESIGNSTUDIO.COM W 0 - Ln U co Z Ln w Z O Lu O CI,� a� O 0� \ / U Z � OW Z O ` 0 � U Z Ln Ef NOTE, DESIGN 111 LC.EOR ASSUMES I STRUCTURALOROR DI S6MEINBIONAL nssu . C'S ANswcloTHE E ON SPUB-CONTRACTORS. CON—E.E.—NSMUST VERI-1) CHECK A-1- NOTES 000escnssiuoloOUTE OF NOMERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ISSUE DATE 2.17.23 3.10.23 A3.0 BUILDING SECTION IN Rd 3 � • �Yahill dr j h iL _ + 1 1 I�OL ' 1 F 'r 1 •�f? l � ama t ++fi +' „� _. _ `, �Iv i•i� �'t v 7� F ♦"cif � i •, I�I � }R �. �f •�� �r �i� ¢ 'v' � `y .�'{���5' 4 M*ti. ��#'�ti � i; y •� r F {� + +' • r r ''{C�+I, t� :.sy ` v { 1F+ ��} T � F _� � J M * '' 'i � n . * 1�# '• � i It %d '. _Np 7r '~R I +• '~{` r��ti'�y`,r :h,'- �•_�'�-.J�f�',�_T;;T�i'+t*-'�F��+�•� 1 +•�*. •� i h 4. a dp M i J 4 y k L J J „o �i 5 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3210 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CRISTOFORI WOODS AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE NO. 1706 WHEREAS, the City. of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a three unit Planned Residential Development and subdivision of a plat by William F. Knapp and Evelyn S. Knapp (hereinafter the subdividers); and WHEREAS, the subdivision for the Planned Residential Development (hereinafter "PRD") has been found to meet all pertinent standards of the RR-lA Zoning District, on-site septic and PRD codes that will allow the continued and future single family residential uses to be fully developed without the need of any variances to the Orono zoning code or to the special development standards adopted for the PRD; and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3069, a resolution granting preliminary approval of the three unit PRD and subdivision. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road shown as County Road No. 84 or Bayside Road. 3. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot C to be known henceforth as Cristofori Circle. 4. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdividers have dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said outlot; the subdividers have Page 1 of 4 a CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3210 created non-exclusive ingress, egress drainage and utility easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting or benefiting lot owners, covenant and agree to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. 5. Dedication to the City of a drainage easement providing for limitations on the use of retention areas and drainage ways described therein and shown on the plat as drainage easements. 6. Dedication to the City of an open space easement over Outlots A and B, Cristofori Woods, in order to fulfill area credit for planned residential development within the RR-lA Zoning District. 7. Dedication of a utilities and access easement via Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B of Cristofori Woods granting to the City access to the adjacent Nature Conservancy property that is currently landlocked. 8. Execution of a subdividers agreement providing for installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. 9. Payment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of $200.00. 10. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00. 11. Payment to the City for the filing of the final subdivision application in the amount of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Cristofori Woods, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. In the approval of the three unit Planned Residential Development for Cristofori Woods, the following special development standards have been approved by the City: Page 2 of 4 N CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3210 a. Residential construction setbacks are as follows: 50' front and rear 30' side 50' from Outlot D 26'from all areas designated as drainage easements b. No residential construction or land alteration shall be allowed within areas that exceed 18% slope. C. Accessory structures may be located in front of the front line of the principal structure on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. 2. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before June 14, 1993 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 14th day of December, 1992. ATTEST: ILI 4t�-�h - othy allin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3210 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of December, 1992, Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. No ar Public LINDA S. VEE — NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires 8-12.68 Page 4 of 4 • ==YI C� r ? �o RESOLUTION #3210 1,3 - 335, 41 r 70004' _ F� a".5!C p. v� rn I= eay�rM-w I xA!2 .Z �Qi •P L I I �� -� ITI (�• //C A �N IE p al EI � f>ls� f Qpm cn �yy+i y IILN O .p'°. !� �O. �O\�O �j �1J♦ ��J\ Az, I �Cl) /� �� `• �, c e w ? I y♦ �% O u per^ \ _ �• $I J $ I I 290.61 ' >Z .. •. m 'L� �l '1'j/. 1 rsD M D;� Navat'orw s0.os _120.01 M9 ��PO.°i I,;'?_•1 q$.'n N 890 46' 01"W yi{nZ I// .ePw= '� ,• QIP` 1 Y -$.. � aK / � O w= '� �° - ♦�oP o$N 330 83 lO N 890 44' 32" W P '1� 1 / y' 41 r F� p. ' O Oti4% eay�rM-w �Qi •P L I K / 92.55 C iJ5-pp / .s ea•01' Ja'� � � O N //C LA XI IT1 I o`� w „N, a co Qpm �yy+i y IILN O .p'°. !� �O. �O\�O �j �1J♦ ��J\ I �Cl) /� �� `• �, c e w ? I y♦ �% O u per^ \ _ �• ' >Z .. •. m 'L� �l '1'j/. 1 rsD �'.o`w Dnr 1 D;� M9 ��PO.°i I,;'?_•1 q$.'n yi{nZ I// .ePw= '� ,• QIP` 1 Y -$.. � aK / � O w= '� �° - ♦�oP o$N lO N 890 44' 32" W N nn•DO_26'w / '1� 1 / y' 148.04 `:` ^ ' 1nJ.7C N 0•I5'2SE 4 ' 514.00 395.01 a0.00 00.5 - - �- — N 85.44.32'w — — /- tip— 215.55= �j— S 89°44' 32"E 593.53 • co ° h y\ M � ly 46 i� 6 O '� (- 1 •O . p �1 4 ^i L. Rpq� Df� 1 ''��\ ♦ 1 PO cQ m _O p r �; RD .gyp \ Li 729 ej Z O N 8 II p II z S 28 N cA W �° o cn w Sg 55-I F N -j J - L�:� Ul Crisrofvii Cir Crisrnf,i {.ir -j , fololo*.44 Nov 01, 2020 - { �. 0 _ ��� i , �A1�t. �"\ `'� F. ►`.;yea ,� f i 38 31-118-23 410013 38 31-118-23 43 0012 MICHAEL R & MARY E PLANK JEFFREY R & LYNETTE C MAYHEW 327 N CARRINGTON AVE 45 CRISTOFORI CIR BUFFALO WY 82834-1615 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 410014 38 31-118-23 43 0013 SHAWN HOLZSCHUH WILLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP KIMBERLY HOLZSCHUH 85 CRISTOFORI CIR 4115 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 42 0001 38 31-118-23 43 0014 JENNIFER ISHAUG PETER ANTONENKO ANTHONY ISHAUG ANNE ANTONENKO 4245 CHIPPEWA LA PO BOX 757 MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 42 0006 38 31-118-23 43 0015 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT WILLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 85 CRISTOFORI CIR 500 LAFAYETTE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ST PAUL MN 55155 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 31-118-23 42 0019 38 31-118-23 43 0017 THOMAS & KATHLEEN MCCAFFREY WILLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP 4265 CHIPPEWA LA 85 CRISTOFORI CIR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 42 0020 38 31-118-23 43 0018 JOHN YOUNG ANTHONY W & SURYA ROCHEL 4355 CHIPPEWA LA 125 TURNHAM RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 43 0001 38 31-118-23 44 0001 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 31-118-23 43 0002 38 31-118-23 44 0002 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 31-118-23 43 0009 38 31-118-23 44 0003 CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND PO BOX 66 FOR SALE TO ADJACENT CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 PROPERTY OWNER ONLY 38 31-118-23 43 0011 38 31-118-23 44 0004 DAVID A DETERS ANDREW HANSEN & ALEX HANSEN 145 TURNHAM RD 50 CRISTOFORI CIR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ORONO MN 55359 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of Bili and Evie Knapp, _g5 Cristofori Circle, Maple Plain, MN 55359 [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 165 Cristofori Circle also referred to as Land Use Application No. LA23-00025 1 (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date 1 (we) Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form — January 2023 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/17/2023 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 165 Cristofori Circle This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 05/17/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/26/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/25/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 20 June 2023 Subject: #LA23-000028, Loren & Julia Parks, 350 Crestview Avenue Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following variances in order to construct a new single-family home on the property: • Lot area variance • Side yard setback variance • Front yard setback variance • Rear yard setback variance • 75 -foot creek setback • Hardcover within 75 -feet of the creek Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicants are proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new single-family home with a rear patio on the property. Due to the extreme 75 -foot setback from the creek, the home will be situated in the northernmost portion on the lot. The applicant is proposing a two-story home with a full basement. The property is nonconforming to size with 19,604 square feet (0.45 acres) within the LR -1A zoning district where there is a two -acre minimum lot area requirement. The small lot size and the substantial impact the 75 -foot creek setback has on the property results in the need for the requested variances. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The LR -1A district and shoreland setbacks significantly impact the buildable area on the property. The applicant has identified the extremely limited, 132 square foot building envelope as the primary practical difficulty supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds there are several contributing factors to the extremely small building envelope; all of which result in an almost unbuildable lot. The required creek setback, the 50 -foot front and rear setbacks, combined with the 30 -foot side setback are all practical difficulties which support variances for this property. The property owners designed the improvements to be sensitive to the scale of the neighborhood, the creek and attempted to maintain a similar setback from the creek as the existing home location. FILE #LA23-000028 20 June 2023 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 and 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1A Required Existing Proposed Front 50' 39.7' 27' Rear 50' 36.4' 34.7' North Side 30' 33' 10' Stubbs Bay Creek / Protected Tributary 75' ±40' ±39.4' Section 78-305 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 19,604.39 s.f. (0.45 acre) 202' Section 78-1403 — Structural Buildine Cove Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 19,604 s.f. (0.45 acre) Allowed: 3,920 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 1,339 s.f. (6.8%) Proposed: 2,315 s.f. (11.8%) Section 78-1288; 78-1680; and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 4,901 s.f. 2,163 s.f. 3,516 s.f. Tier 1 19,604 s.f. (25 %) (11%) (17.9%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Area Variance (City Code Section 78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, such as the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 35 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's need for setback variances and hardcover variances results in the property's inability to conform to #1 and #4 above. Therefore, a lot area variance is also required in order to develop the property. FILE #LA23-000028 20 June 2023 Page 3 of 5 Front Yard. Side Yard. Rear Yard Setback Variances (City Code Section 78-305 The applicants are proposing to construct a new home and are requesting setback variances as follows: 1. A 27 -foot front setback where a 50 -foot setback is required; 2. A 10 -foot side yard setback from the north, side lot line where a 30 -foot setback is required; and 3. A 34.7' rear setback where a 50 -foot setback is required. Many of the homes in the immediate neighborhood are nonconforming with respect to area and/or width. Additionally, many of the neighboring homes have nonconforming setbacks. The applicants have designed their home to follow a previous variance approval for the property (Resolution 5078, attached as Exhibit H). Hardcover Variance within 75 -foot Creek Setback and 75 -foot Creek Setback Variance (City Code Sections 78-1279; 78-1288 & 78-1680) Stubbs Bay Creek is a protected tributary which requires a 75 -foot structural setback and hardcover restrictions. The creek setback significantly impacts the east and south sides of the property. The new home plan was designed to follow the previously approved plan which attempted to minimize hardcover within the creek setback. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicants are proposing to construct a new single-family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the Ordinance. The lot area variance is consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The variances requested for creek setback, front, side, and rear yard setbacks are reasonable considering extremely limited buildable area of the property. The hardcover variance is also necessary due to the extreme creek setback. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances supporting anew single-family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not FILE #LA23-000028 20 June 2023 Page 4 of 5 permitted by the official controls; The applicants are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner with the construction of a single-family home. There is no conforming space to construct a reasonably sized conforming home on the site. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The owners did not create the difficulties on this property; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed development will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR - 1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The proximity to and impact of Stubbs Bay Creek on this property is unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The challenge of the substandard lot size within the 2 -acre zoning district is shared by the immediate neighborhood, however is unique within the LR -1A zoning district. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The legal buildable area of the lot is only 0.6% of the total lot area. Without variances the property is unbuildable. The variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the Owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Due to the extreme applied setbacks affecting the property, the variances are necessary and are not merely for convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the FILE #LA23-000028 20 June 2023 Page 5 of 5 property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as applied. The planning commission should consider a recommendation for approval which includes the use of pervious pavers for the proposed patio area to offset the stormwater impact within the creek setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Resolution 5078 Exhibit L Adjacent Property Owners List & Acknowledgments Exhibit J. Plat Map 5/22/23, 2:43 PM Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/17/2023 Address: 350 Crestview Avenue Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723140057 Land Use Number: LA23-000028 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: LOREN PARKS Address: 350 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 Name: Julia Parks Applicant: Company: Address: 350 crestview ave Orono, MN 55356 parksjulia3@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Julia Parks parksjulia3@gmail.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: House demo and New Home Build Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/WorkOrderNotes?Action=goToSelectedFileTab&ciDisplay=none&WorkOrder_ID=87006409 1/1 Dear Planning Commission and Council Members, We purchased our home at 350 Crestview avenue in September of 2021 with the intent to demo and build a new home. Our lot is a.455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. Another unique aspect of our lot is the creek which runs down the south side of our lot, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. For this reason we ask for setbacks more consistent with the actual size and character of the lot. The previous owner of our home had setback variances approved that were consistent with those of a lot zoned for .5 acres. Since this was previously approved we felt this would be a good place to start with our plans. The setbacks we are requesting include front yard: 28.0', north side yard: 10.0', rear set back of 34.7' which is 8' further from the rear lot line then the current dwelling. We placed the footprint 28' from the front lot line in order to preserve the 75' creek setback on the south side yard. The rear portion of the current house sits within 75' of the south side yard creek setback. This setback will not be encroached by the new house. During the design process of our home we were mindful of how the house would accommodate our lot. We chose a 1.5 story home as opposed to a full 2 -story to avoid a looming effect, due to the smaller size of our lot. We also designed the home to be well outside of the 75' creek setback line on the south side, which will preserve the natural space and beauty of our street. We have received very positive feedback from our neighbors in regards to our plans to build. We believe our build will be an improvement to the area and will have good curb appeal. In conclusion, we believe our variance requests are reasonable, prove practical difficulty given the size and character of the lot, and are in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the ordinance. Thank you for your consideration, Julia & Loren Parks 5/22/23, 2:43 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000028 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. The lot also has a creek which runs down the south side, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. For this reason we ask for setbacks more consistent with the actual size and character of the lot. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: 350 Crestview ave has unique circumstances because it is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. The lot also has a creek which runs down the south side, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. For this reason we ask for setbacks more consistent with the actual size and character of the lot. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Crestview ave is zoned for 2 -acre lots, however all but one of the parcels are less then 2 - acres. The majority of the lots are smaller lots containing older, smaller homes, or homes that were more recently built requiring setback variances. 350 Crestview is a .455 acre lot. The setbacks we are requesting are similar to those approved for newer homes on our street. Furthermore, the current dwelling on our lot encroaches within 75' of the south side yard creek setback which our new footprint would not do. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&Work0rder_ID=87006409&ciDisplay=none&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 5/22/23, 2:43 PM Response: N/A Permit List I Citizenserve 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. Another unique aspect of our lot is the creek which runs down the south side of our lot, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. For this reason we ask for the following setbacks which are more consistent with the actual size and character of the lot: front yard: 28.0, north side yard: 10.0, rear set back of 34.7' which is 8' further from the rear lot line then the current dwelling. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Crestview avenue has many smaller lots, <2 -acres, that are zoned for 2 -acres. 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. Another unique aspect of the lot is the creek which runs down the south side of the lot, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Correct. 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. The lot also has a creek which runs down the south side of the lot, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would only allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. The setbacks we are requesting would allow us to build a reasonable home. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct. The proposed setback variance will not impair health, safety, comfort, or morals. It is not contrary to the zoning code as we are requesting setbacks that are more consistent with the actual size of our lot. 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: 350 Crestview ave is a .455 -acre parcel which is zoned as a 2 acre -parcel. The lot also has a creek which runs down the south side of our lot, subjecting our build plans to the 75 -foot creek set back. The current 2 -acre setbacks along with a 75' creek setback from the south side yard would only allow a 609.5sq/ft buildable footprint. The setbacks we are requesting would allow us to build a reasonable home. https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&Work0rder_ID=87006409&ciDisplay=none&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 N 0 E m 0 o L W Ui L� f U) �+ J LU h� U `) 9Q 9� e 9 C/) 0 E C/) m 0 a� a W Co J Co // 9g SSS h� 9 N �s rn 0 40 40 ho opo � �)�' 0 955.60 Existing Conditions Survey 962.. Retaining Wall - FF= 963.19 House I �O 37 0 20 40 Feet I I - - denotes Building Setback Line IX - g59.47962.63*962.98 964 Front = 50' Side = 30' XSon. MH Rear = 50' -Rim=955.36 -N line of \bRt 5, Block 6 P\ I Inv=946.01 r I I v 962 � Creek = 75' X958.65 \ /n\ I%n41.52 962 X950.81 �I iC� Existing / J 79'� n \I ✓ I S line of the N 40.00 \ Shed (C) ' IoyF \ I -of Lot 5, Block 6 7 I I L / i - 8.25 8.25 56.4 960 / w (124.,5 plot) r/ o Row of Lilacs 8921'18 E 12 .Almeo . k L� Ji / 5.45 f) 9 \ 956 g8 0 Xo S6 0 6?6 S nal / / /X939.35 S89 21'18 E 125.44 meos. (125.25 plot) LQ no. 57.51 9( B) �h �bhW 0��`gg 54 ov Existing QExstgBt. s CO �fiDriveway (D) ->•. n Garage b C� X 938.71 - -FF=957.56 17.5E -►I �`L CO . _ s, g56 / fig" ( r Y N 955.56X � 0h� Oy�Wolk (E) 01 / 14'ASH ��tx`b i9� Well 56.93 I 1 Cs6 X 936.34 X 937.87 _..._..._39.7-...._... 9 o O 93 �... FF=958.65 ssoo 00 ` Existing House (A) ,�p�'� GEEK - - - - - 3� I R� 1 'Edge of Woter,. w oos - _..._..._..._..._.. _ 5.0_ ..`�.. X24 5 1 X19 ---- -- zo \ s � 9S4 � 9 ..:•• _.. /36.4-..._..._... \ 09 o 58921'12'E 125.32 meos. (flat)Ln s Q , 9 OAK / 0 /Llj 0 rn `''� V9 Qs `9S�R n 51 !J. ?�' \ �\\ \\ \ o� 8+ l- (� '-' ''Retaining Wall o,�� 0 X938.91 0 9so` 67 / / I \ \ k �, o O W 'tl� p 5n y X942.68 37 78 X ON Ln 1� T X 950 8 / / ,� I \ \ o k1 ► Are 1 604x34 S. F, N10 s '948 Benchmark: / / \ \ �� ) X941.38 RR Spike in W'rly face of PP 938.99X \ \ i / E/evotion=945.76 Feet X948.4-77--/ X944.46 �/ g38 8.25 1 \ 0 (N. o. V. D. 1988) / / �,• �, \ \ / / l` 946 S8.92 02 E 125.25 / 70'� g36 �• 1 X 937 14 / ,tear X944.64 i 100 t -1o0 944 14 od E�e�% _ "OAK 942 4S Flo y 938.58X o Xg43.04 �ry 39 g n /j g P e°5 / / I� X 937.62 k2939.9-�i�-�. I � 939.20X ��(31b6k � / / o 0 X 938.56 I I _ ,\yh' N o Son.MH Rim 1942.1In V Q 937.51X 5h� I g35,5�// "oter fl ___ V� i d9e f \ o ,EEK iE ��_'� \ LLJ / 0R \ / \ LEGEND 988 denotes Existing Contour 988.00 X denotes Existing Spot Elevation FF=989.36 denotes Finished Floor Elevation -0- denotes Power Pole p denotes Sanitary Cleanout Qs denotes Sanitary Manhole Driveway denotes Deciduous Tree ss denotes Sanitary Sewer Line ST denotes Storm Sewer Line OHE denotes Overhead Electric Line oz '711.23 denotes Existing Culvert I I - - denotes Building Setback Line IX - g59.47962.63*962.98 964 Front = 50' Side = 30' XSon. MH Rear = 50' -Rim=955.36 -N line of \bRt 5, Block 6 P\ I Inv=946.01 r I I v 962 � Creek = 75' X958.65 \ /n\ I%n41.52 962 X950.81 �I iC� Existing / J 79'� n \I ✓ I S line of the N 40.00 \ Shed (C) ' IoyF \ I -of Lot 5, Block 6 7 I I L / i - 8.25 8.25 56.4 960 / w (124.,5 plot) r/ o Row of Lilacs 8921'18 E 12 .Almeo . k L� Ji / 5.45 f) 9 \ 956 g8 0 Xo S6 0 6?6 S nal / / /X939.35 S89 21'18 E 125.44 meos. (125.25 plot) LQ no. 57.51 9( B) �h �bhW 0��`gg 54 ov Existing QExstgBt. s CO �fiDriveway (D) ->•. n Garage b C� X 938.71 - -FF=957.56 17.5E -►I �`L CO . _ s, g56 / fig" ( r Y N 955.56X � 0h� Oy�Wolk (E) 01 / 14'ASH ��tx`b i9� Well 56.93 I 1 Cs6 X 936.34 X 937.87 _..._..._39.7-...._... 9 o O 93 �... FF=958.65 ssoo 00 ` Existing House (A) ,�p�'� GEEK - - - - - 3� I R� 1 'Edge of Woter,. w oos - _..._..._..._..._.. _ 5.0_ ..`�.. X24 5 1 X19 ---- -- zo \ s � 9S4 � 9 ..:•• _.. /36.4-..._..._... \ 09 o 58921'12'E 125.32 meos. (flat)Ln s Q , 9 OAK / 0 /Llj 0 rn `''� V9 Qs `9S�R n 51 !J. ?�' \ �\\ \\ \ o� 8+ l- (� '-' ''Retaining Wall o,�� 0 X938.91 0 9so` 67 / / I \ \ k �, o O W 'tl� p 5n y X942.68 37 78 X ON Ln 1� T X 950 8 / / ,� I \ \ o k1 ► Are 1 604x34 S. F, N10 s '948 Benchmark: / / \ \ �� ) X941.38 RR Spike in W'rly face of PP 938.99X \ \ i / E/evotion=945.76 Feet X948.4-77--/ X944.46 �/ g38 8.25 1 \ 0 (N. o. V. D. 1988) / / �,• �, \ \ / / l` 946 S8.92 02 E 125.25 / 70'� g36 �• 1 X 937 14 / ,tear X944.64 i 100 t -1o0 944 14 od E�e�% _ "OAK 942 4S Flo y 938.58X o Xg43.04 �ry 39 g n /j g P e°5 / / I� X 937.62 k2939.9-�i�-�. I � 939.20X ��(31b6k � / / o 0 X 938.56 I I _ ,\yh' N o Son.MH Rim 1942.1In V Q 937.51X 5h� I g35,5�// "oter fl ___ V� i d9e f \ o ,EEK iE ��_'� \ LLJ / 0R \ / \ X935.91 i..-lnv 932.52 0 .-Inv=932.63 48" CMP ti X 939.18 = 0 40 i 936.93 EXISTING HARDCOVER CAL CUL A TIONS: k� 19,604.34 Key to Survey 0 (1 ° °' 99 / / l 1 / House 1,005 S. F. B LLJ c= 253 S. F. / Shed 81 S.F. D Driveway 770 S.F. E Conc, Walks 54 S.F. TO TAL 2,163 S. F. Wate / 11.0 oz '711.23 f / �Ed9e ° / X 937 00 ••._Property Corner falls in Culvert X935.91 i..-lnv 932.52 0 .-Inv=932.63 48" CMP ti X 939.18 = 0 40 i 936.93 EXISTING HARDCOVER CAL CUL A TIONS: Area of Lot = 19,604.34 Key to Survey Hardcover Items Total (Square Feet) A House 1,005 S. F. B Garage 253 S. F. C Shed 81 S.F. D Driveway 770 S.F. E Conc, Walks 54 S.F. TO TAL 2,163 S. F. HARDCOVER 11.0 q Property Description: Lots 6, 7, 8 and that port of Lot 5 lying South of the North 40 feet thereof, Block 6, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof, aCn • O C U N O r0 C: Q) L 0 J 1 co N co 1 LO O F a i m PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULA TIONS: Area of Lot = 19,604.34 S. F. Key to Survey Hardcover Items Total (Square Feet) A House 2,J15 S. F. B Driveway 561 S. F. C Stoop 61 S. F. D Patio 534 S. F. E Cantilever 10 S. F. F Conc. Walks 35 S.F. TOTAL 3,516 S. F. Z HARDCOVER 17.9 z S 40 Cn 155.60 Building Permit Survey 962.96 9 Retaining Wall-..., 6sr> -*&- o House I - 5.37 I N, 959.47X 962.63 962.98 10 964 -N line oft \lock 6 nI I I 92 INSTALL & i / \ s Q(:9 / _MAINTAIN ROCK X958.65 \ X961.52 _ X950.81 � CONSTRUCTION \ o Proposed 962 ENTRANCE 958 r� _T-956.64 0� i "-WO/Ioining � j \sem, \/ �: �... B-954.90 ✓ I jT- 958.38 � B-954.90 / ti� l S line of the N 40.001 T-957.31 !� I l - sof Lot 5, Block 6 �B-954.901 % - 56.47 � J II 960 8.25 8.25 = I . (125.25plot) i O Row of Lilacs 8921'18 E 125.41meos. X945.45 N/ 4, 0 958.35 '9S O: �- X -28.0 68921'18'E 125.44meos. 6. _T_ o --- .w X956.88265 X957.61 9 18 o --SS to Oy 0 p �. cb. 0 0. X938.71 r000se4d F 9s) ^' 0` �`'� Oh 0� itumiit�si �\ /OA, X N 6 - i �O 9S� 9 6 6� /J 5 Oho OyF sr 2.66 O 4. � 14 "A � s� w Cs X 936 34 0 20 40 Feet X9,39.35 r to +56. O8 ... -34••..�•993S,36 X937.87 ¢p 6 o Conc. Wolk (F 00 9S6�S Hoiwse(A) -i PProp ol ooD d is oo \� 9 4 rn Q) 6.50 Qi Sloop(C) 0 o _Dc 7 .0°-� Edge of Woter, IQ AO Contilever(E) S 12:83 9� 9S� h� 1 +0 - - - - - - - CS 1 0 27.0- N S8921'12'E 125.32 mens. (125.25 tot) / / � o rn 9 .-28.0-- 20.66 9 9S3S2'�C95 .J �_, I \ 1 \ w zoo S,c� �,, 954 \ QRS 9s �I < 9"OAKj ti W \ \ SF \ V � E '�� / Qin to \ \ °� I \ \ h� X938.91 �� \. \SE F / / so, SF F \� / / / 2 I \ \ k o 0 0 0 0 10 \ \ �ry 3778X �- SF S� \Xg5 / X942.68 / o O 0 1,9604. J4 S.F. �N0 '948 Benchmork: X941.38 RR Spike in W'rty foce of PP a+ 938.99X \ \ > L� / Elevation=945.76 Feet X948.47 % X944.46 / 938 8.25 1 \ o (N. o. V. D. 1988) l` 946 S8921'12 "E 125.25 / 0� 36 �. o i \ T_ 9 1 X 937 14 1 Year / X944.64 j00 apt j >. / \ 944 r load o�4 r 14 "OAK 942 4Sx F1� 938.58X Xg43 1ry v 39.9 k2 939.9--�i\ v ��\ / 939 20X l�`'y6°` Fe�S // // o I CPO X937.62 9 X938.56 I N o I v z jVl I I v 8 Q 937.51X of �oterl1 \ w 'opo GREEK �Edg / \ \ 936.93 �+ / �9� -936 \ \ k 9 0°' / / / / 7 l 1 c= / T LLJ Wa{e oz 711.23 �Ed9e a , X 937 00 \••._Property Corner falls in Culvert X9,35.91 T_ -Inv 932.52\ _ - In v= 932.63 .0 48 CMP Property Description: � Y, Lots 6, 7, 8 and that part of Lot 5 lying South 0 °' X939.18= of the North 40 feet thereof, Block 6, BAYSIDE 0 ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, Hennepin County, 4o Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCL. STOCKPILES) MUST BE STABILIZED. STABILIZATION MUST BE INI TIA TED IMMEDIA TEL Y TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT COMPLETED IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS /F DRAINING TO AN IMPAIRED WATER (14 DAYS /F NOT), AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. RAPID STABILIZATION SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) OR 21-112 (FALL) @ 100 LB/ACRE WITH MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH @ 2 TONS/ACRE (D/SC ANCHORED) OR APPROVED EQUAL. STABILIZA TION MUST BE INI TIA TED IMMEDIA TEL Y BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LA TER THAN 7 DA YS /F DRAINING TO AN IMPAIRED WATER (14 DAYS IF NOT), AFTER THE ACTIVITY IN THAT PORT/ON OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL BE SOD Proposed Elevations: Top of Foundation=954.83 Garage Floor= 954.50 Basement Floor= 945.59 /HARD FACEOAD 0 0 o Sa M/biMv > o 0 0 6" MIN DEPTH 1"-2" WASHED ROCK o GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 5' MIN. LENGTH POST AT 4' MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH DIRECTION OF BACKFILL WITH TAMPED RUNOFF FLOWo NATURAL SOIL - z - > z U.) o 6 I� N a m MIN M W SILT FENCE DETAIL SF -SF -SF -DENOTES SILT FENCE • O s-� O N C r0 1 LEGEND 988 denotes Existing Contour 988.00 X denotes Existing Spot Elevation FF=989.36 denotes Finished Floor Elevation 1010 denotes Proposed Contour 1017.5 X denotes Proposed Spot Elevation U denotes Proposed Drainage -0- denotes Power Pole o denotes Sanitary Cleanout Qs denotes Sanitary Manhole 0 denotes Deciduous Tree ss denotes Sanitary Sewer Line ST denotes Storm Sewer Line oHE denotes Overhead Electric Line SF denotes Pre -construction Silt Fence � denotes Existing Culvert - - denotes Building Setback Line Fron t = 50' Side = 30' Rear = 50' Creek = 75' X9,39.35 r to +56. O8 ... -34••..�•993S,36 X937.87 ¢p 6 o Conc. Wolk (F 00 9S6�S Hoiwse(A) -i PProp ol ooD d is oo \� 9 4 rn Q) 6.50 Qi Sloop(C) 0 o _Dc 7 .0°-� Edge of Woter, IQ AO Contilever(E) S 12:83 9� 9S� h� 1 +0 - - - - - - - CS 1 0 27.0- N S8921'12'E 125.32 mens. (125.25 tot) / / � o rn 9 .-28.0-- 20.66 9 9S3S2'�C95 .J �_, I \ 1 \ w zoo S,c� �,, 954 \ QRS 9s �I < 9"OAKj ti W \ \ SF \ V � E '�� / Qin to \ \ °� I \ \ h� X938.91 �� \. \SE F / / so, SF F \� / / / 2 I \ \ k o 0 0 0 0 10 \ \ �ry 3778X �- SF S� \Xg5 / X942.68 / o O 0 1,9604. J4 S.F. �N0 '948 Benchmork: X941.38 RR Spike in W'rty foce of PP a+ 938.99X \ \ > L� / Elevation=945.76 Feet X948.47 % X944.46 / 938 8.25 1 \ o (N. o. V. D. 1988) l` 946 S8921'12 "E 125.25 / 0� 36 �. o i \ T_ 9 1 X 937 14 1 Year / X944.64 j00 apt j >. / \ 944 r load o�4 r 14 "OAK 942 4Sx F1� 938.58X Xg43 1ry v 39.9 k2 939.9--�i\ v ��\ / 939 20X l�`'y6°` Fe�S // // o I CPO X937.62 9 X938.56 I N o I v z jVl I I v 8 Q 937.51X of �oterl1 \ w 'opo GREEK �Edg / \ \ 936.93 �+ / �9� -936 \ \ k 9 0°' / / / / 7 l 1 c= / T LLJ Wa{e oz 711.23 �Ed9e a , X 937 00 \••._Property Corner falls in Culvert X9,35.91 T_ -Inv 932.52\ _ - In v= 932.63 .0 48 CMP Property Description: � Y, Lots 6, 7, 8 and that part of Lot 5 lying South 0 °' X939.18= of the North 40 feet thereof, Block 6, BAYSIDE 0 ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, Hennepin County, 4o Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCL. STOCKPILES) MUST BE STABILIZED. STABILIZATION MUST BE INI TIA TED IMMEDIA TEL Y TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT COMPLETED IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS /F DRAINING TO AN IMPAIRED WATER (14 DAYS /F NOT), AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. RAPID STABILIZATION SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) OR 21-112 (FALL) @ 100 LB/ACRE WITH MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH @ 2 TONS/ACRE (D/SC ANCHORED) OR APPROVED EQUAL. STABILIZA TION MUST BE INI TIA TED IMMEDIA TEL Y BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LA TER THAN 7 DA YS /F DRAINING TO AN IMPAIRED WATER (14 DAYS IF NOT), AFTER THE ACTIVITY IN THAT PORT/ON OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL BE SOD Proposed Elevations: Top of Foundation=954.83 Garage Floor= 954.50 Basement Floor= 945.59 /HARD FACEOAD 0 0 o Sa M/biMv > o 0 0 6" MIN DEPTH 1"-2" WASHED ROCK o GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 5' MIN. LENGTH POST AT 4' MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH DIRECTION OF BACKFILL WITH TAMPED RUNOFF FLOWo NATURAL SOIL - z - > z U.) o 6 I� N a m MIN M W SILT FENCE DETAIL SF -SF -SF -DENOTES SILT FENCE • O s-� O N C r0 1 txiW•� Q � N J � � 0 m I 2 O "" o o -3 O U n3 Z3 O ,C � � O O U 'n aJ N � zj :ta O O O i r N W e �a� o Q txiW•� Q � _ O � � J � � 0 m I 2 i (z Q Z o C) O O U L � � � U N Q Q) �z ~O z � 0i00 m Q Q •� N o � O N C'7 O N O N N N L0 DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. 4) A-0 U) U C) Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: AO LOWER FLOOR 44'- 5 5/8" 18'- 2 3/8" 9'- 3 3/4" 22' - 0" 4'- 0" 5'- 10 1/4" T- 3 5/8" A6 2 411 A5 1, A6 4 z, yw ■ r . CL _ _X BATH. = AOL:. co WORK OUT 2 Lo Ld MECHANICAL 003 002 0 ~ +6"' � + :,' f z w w 1 - c 005. ' N co 004 6 � r • 16 N 1 + I . �� ■ , ,� N II -I� • M I1 N w BR 1 1 zo A5 CONC SLAB ABOVE • I'• "_ ' r ' _ 1I' 'p ..0 ''.� 'b ' ■ _ 7i . , u ■ . li . a u ■ ■ UP i i F. . •u: ■ 3r - . _ o• z , 18'- 6 4/8" oe N 1 FAMILY ROOM A6 9'- 6 1/8" 13'- 1 7/8" T- 0" ` 22' - 8" ' W oe `, Lo 00 3 3 w op co A6 A6 I � I ' REC ROOM . _ 6'-6" BATH 11' - 2 1/8" N 1.1' O _ fr r� 011 O 010 008.1 ' 008 ' 4- ------ --_ 00 SHOWER A6 . . ..• 2 ' L? f I �r 0 � _ A5 N I _ . en 7 • :•- 12'-10" 2 CL A6 •BR 2 1 Lu 2 A6 co- I , W00 � (V 009 bo • j 16 16 I _ 0 6'- 1 7/8" T- 0 1/4" oe T- 5 7/8" ' co 20'- 8" WINDOW WELL 1 LOWER FLOOR Ao 1/411 = 1'-0" DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. 4) A-0 U) U C) Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: AO LOWER FLOOR N N N 0 N N N L0 R')' Q" DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q A-0 U) U C) Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A I MAIN FLOOR 12'-31/4" 8'-61/4" 10'-6" 12'-53/4" 6' - 1 1/4" 6' - 2" 1' - 7" 6' - 11 1/4" 10' - 6" 1' - 11 1/4" 18' - 10 3/4" 2' - 6" 1' - 11 1/4" 6' - 1 1/4" 4 A6 2 1 A5 A6 1 1 1 1 o ih _ o 13�j — ---- -- ------ I r I - h -PLUMBING - iv WALL MUD ROOM M CL MB H _ 17 `° 116.2 1 zo 7 LAUNDRY00 116 14 13 co N00 rmL ----- Co SOAP C14f -- 116.1 --- �� I 114 113 N NICHE M 0 2' - 5 1/2" ' '3'- 10 1/2" -J8' - 0 1 /2° 2' - 5 1 /2" 3' - 11 1/2.1 2' - 11 " 7' - 7" N r 6' - 4 1 /2" 6' - 1 1/4" _ r 120.2 4 118 k 18 r 120.3 112 o N o 119 w - 115 w 16 1 GARAGE 4 -�U x N 0 1 "' z Zo p'S 19 - i � }�1R 9 03 x M DROOM A5 N o 120J1 IT_M a irENC-TRUSSES t_ ==�_ t, - DEN W 12 , k -I — — — Co --- 7., o 6'-4" 10'-6" - 4'-31/4" 115.1; Co Lo zo LL KITCHEN — 20 � I • 18 18 18 18 r 10' - 10 1/2;Ch 1 I A6 129 4'- C0 8" 2' 10 3/8" 2' - 4 1/2" 5'- 8 1/4" T- 1" lo Lo.. ti — — _ GIRDER TRUSS BY MANUF _ — — — — — — J 9' - 10 /4" 12' - 9 1 /4" CD ' 18' - 10 3/4" — — — — - - 2' - 5 1 /2" 18' - 7 3/4" LL — — — — —11 p 22'- 8" Lo cv 3,_0„ Q M � it I } 00 2 oo FOYER 00 ENG, TRUSSES � Cn � 3 co A6 22 By MMUF D A6 � ' ih 1'-0" 3'-0" 17'-8" 12'-10" w o FET � DESK/BUFIn I I� o0 80 N I M 21-11 1/2" I DINING ROOM I' - 6 1/2" 0 6'-6" I 00 LIVING I ROOM 18 I 2� LnZ �UEBEQ 1 18 IN lk L -----"NW 2 18 WY I F r� A5 6'- 1 1/2" 6'- 8 1/2" 2 $ I I 2 12'- 10" A6 I N 18 N M lV 18 18 18 18 4 A 1'-0' 4'-5" 3'-11/4" 2'-93/4" 2'-93/4" 3'-11/4" 4'-5" of 1 MAIN FLOOR Al 1/411 = 1'-0" 20'- 8" DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q A-0 U) U C) Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A I MAIN FLOOR cV :!t Ico M Io 2 A6 N 1 2ND FLOOR A2 1/411 = 1'-0'L 18 18 18 18 8" 19'- 6 1/2" 10'- 2 3/4" 4'- 5 1/2" 5'- 9 1/4" 4 2 A6 A5 ir GG 16 16 225 E G, TRUS ES Y MANIJF � CL co 00 co 2 BR 4 26 L0 L:l ti L� PLAY ROOM DN 7; M i_? co HALL 27 , co CD 9'- 6 3/4" 2'-6" 7' - 10 1/2" 228 5' - 4 1/2" 14' - 8 1/4" % c� 231 230 + 229 ,' BR 5 b L f BATH 28 STORAGE u30 CL 31 , 29 C° ENG. TRU SEES BY MAJINUF r ENG, TRUWES BY MANLUF 4 A6 2 A6 �, 12' - 10" 2 A5 224 EAmo zAw �� 224.1 op ih "kv 224.2 3 A6 1 A6 ini IN BR 3 24 w F_ 1 A6 22'-8" co 7t M w DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: 2ND FLOOR roN C'7 M N O N N N L0 1 A5 A 2ND CEILING t 18'-6" ` �, _ _ - ,� CEILING 12 t 15'-6" 9; -7 IEL I _U f _ 2ND FLOOR MAIN CEILING Ogg wm� In. 9'_o„ 1 I Ll V11 MAIN FLOORS , '� •;�� `� GARAGE -R' -7" 1 WEST A3 1/411 = 1'-0" 'S .. r`••yl a 4� N { -. . . . x .. Lj =d 11=I I=I I 11=III=III=I I I =1I I=� I I=I I I—I I I=I I I—I I I=I I I—I I I=1I I=1I I=1 I I=I I F1 I I=I I I=1I =1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= 3 3D View 1 2 EAST A3 A3 1/811 = 1'-0" DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 GE TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN UTSON DESIGN TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTIN G STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE.Lo JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A3 ELEVATIONS i u 0. Illi 11111 11 2ND FLOOR 10'-6" MAIN CEILING kv 1 '4 MAIN FLOOR =NG AGE . —�LOWERLI _ G=1' �6" GARAGE TOF �=TI-1TI�_T=� Il-1�I=ITI-f I I �_=III=;1T�f_____-_ _ _- -_ _ _ _5� _ 2��� I I -I II=I II=I IElI I=II M I I -I I M I El II=I IElIMI I=II MI I 1 IEl IElIMI I=II MI I M I M II=I IMIMI I=II 1=I I I -I II=I E1= _ _ __- _ -_ -_ EE I EEI IEE IILI IE=1I ILII ILI I IL]E I I -E IEll IEll IILI I IEIE ILI I E_E IEll IEll IILI I UI ILI I I_E I Ell I Ell EI -1 IILI IILI I I -1E I -I I I-1 IEll IIlEIILI I ILII ISI I I-1 II -1 II:IIN= EIIIIEIIIIIEIII� ��E111�E1„IIE� E� 1111EEE�J III �EI_,IIIE11 EEI„IIE� E� 111�EEI�J ISI �III_IIIEIIEE-EES E� 1111EEI11J1�� �III;IIIEIIEI�;IIE� EEI �EE��J III �E1-_IIIEIEEII;IIEI E, 11,1�E�LOWERF_LOOR SOUTH 1/4” = 1'-0” m-oolm VIEW 3 3D View 2 A4 women . IIIII� '.I... .,,,,,,. EH. NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0" �Vo DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q A-0 07 U 0 Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: ELEVATIONS SEAL -DOWN ASPHALT SHINGLES 15# BUILDING FELT ICE & WATERSHIELD TO 24" INSIDE WALL 5/8" OSB SHEATHING ROOF SHEATHING MANUFACTURED ROOF TRUSSES @24" INSULATION BAFFLE ENERGY HEEL DRIP EDGE SQUARE CUT FASCIA 3/8" PLYWD. SOFFIT 2" CONT. VENT WDO UNITS U=0.31 (MAX) R-9 BATTS AT HDR INSULATED RIM JOIST' R-21 SPRAY FOAM STUCCO SIDING BY MANUIF HOUSEWRAP, 25/32" COMP- OSITION WALL SHEATHING 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. INSULATION 6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BD. INSULATED RIM JOIST R-21 SPRAY FOAM WATERPROOFING - mi R-10 XPS RIGID INSULATION'11- 8" CONC. WALL WITH REINFORCING FOOTING TY�,1 + ��. 3 Section 2 - Callout 1 A5 3/8" = 1'-0" R-49 ND CEILING 18'-6" 5/8" GYP. BD. OVER POLY VAPOR BARRIER J I� r CALK AT JOINTS - PLATE TO FLOOR SHEATHING FLOOR FINISH AS SCHEDULED 25/32" T&G OSB FLR SHTNG GLUED AND NAILED 2ND FLOOR 10'-6" 18" BY MANUF. _MAIN CEILING 9'-0.. R-21 CALK AT JOINTS - PLATE TO FLOOR SHEATHING FLOOR FINISH AS SCHEDULED 25/32" T&G OSB FLR SHTNG GLUED AND NAILED _ _MAIN FLOOR � Oil 18" BY MAN UF. LOWER CEILING -1'-6" TRTD. 2x6 W/ SILL SEALER & 5/8" A.B. @ 4' O.C. EMBED 7" MIN. IN CONC. R-5 THERMAX FOIL FACED RIGID INSUL FOIL TAPE SEAMS, CALK TO FLOOR WALK OUT AT BEDROOMS, VERIFY WITH SITE AND GRADING 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT W/ CAULKING 4" CONC. SLAB _LOWER FLOOR -9 - 6•• _, I I- 6" DRAIN TILE W/ SILT SLEEVE SET IN GRAVEL TO DAYLIGHT OR SUMP Section 1 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 A5 oil I 11 I I_ 11- I I -11 2 Section 2 A5 3/16" = 1'-0" 17 :III:III:I I ISI I I - 2ND CEILING 49L 18'--6" CEILING 12 15'-6" 2ND FLOOR MAIN CEILING 9' _0 .. MAIN c:I nnQ GARAGE _LOWER CEILING -1'-6" I E TOF AL -5'-2" LOWER FLOOR -I 1I- 2ND CEILNGAIL CEILING 12 2ND FLOOR 10'-6" MAIN CEILING 9' -oil f f' MAIN FLOOR 0" LOWER CEILING -1' - 6" • I11-1I1-1I1-1II-111_ -1 I I=1 I I-111-1 I I-1 I- H I I-1 I I -I 11=1 I El.111_LOWER FLOOR = -1 I I:III-1 I I: � �I I I-1 I I-III:III-1 DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Ate-+ U) U C) L0 m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A5 SECTIONS Section 5 3/16" = 1'-0" :III -111- Section 6 3/16" = 1'-0" -11I-� I I-11 I-1 I I-1 .II I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I l,l I lil =1 I I=111-11 IE1 11=1 11=1 -III-1 M I-1 1 1-1 1 1=1 11`,1, i I—III—III—III—III—III—III' Section 3 3/16" = 1'-0" milm Section 4 3/16" = 1'-0" 2ND CEILING 18'-6" CEILING 12 15'-6" 2ND FLOOR 10'-6" MAIN FLOOR On ,11 li :I I 1= ;1 LOWER FLOOR -9'-6" I- —II 2ND CEILING t 181-611 CEILING 12 15'-6" 2- 2ND FLOOR t 10' - 6" -I MAIN CEILING t 9'-0" IF WON I I I IN MAIN FLOOR � 0.. 1 _ LOWER CEILING GARAGE TOF I I -51 211 V IIF , LOWER FLOOR - -9'-6" DATE: 2023-01-27 DDA 7TCT"_XTC - REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 E I G N TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. U) U 0 L0 m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A 6 SECTIONS ID Door Schedule Mark Width Height Level Comments 001 21-611 6' - 8" LOWER FLOOR 002 21-61' 6'- 8" LOWER FLOOR 003 21-611 61- 8" LOWER FLOOR 004 51-011 6' - 8" LOWER FLOOR 005 31-011 6' - 8" LOWER FLOOR 008 2' - 6" 6' - 8" LOWER FLOOR 008.1 21-611 6' - 8" LOWER FLOOR 009 21-611 61-811 LOWER FLOOR 010 21-011 61-811 LOWER FLOOR 011 21-611 6' - 8" 8' - 0" LOWER FLOOR GARAGE 119 18'- 0" 112 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 113 21-611 8' - 0" MAIN FLOOR 114 21-611 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR 115 21-611 8' - 0" MAIN FLOOR 115.1 4' - 0" 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR 116 21- 6" 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR 116.1 116.2 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 81-0" 8' - 0" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 162 117 31-01' 81-011 MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 118 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 120 41-011 61-811 MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 120.1 41-011 8' - 0" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 120.2 41-011 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 120.3 21-611 61- 8" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 120.4 10' - 0" 8' - 0" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 122 3' - 0" 7' - 8" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 224 21-6" 6' - 8" 2ND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 224.1 41-011 6' - 8" 2ND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 224.2 41-011 61-811 2ND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 225 21-611 61-811 2ND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 226 21-611 61-811 2ND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 228 21-611 61-811 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 229 21-611 61-8" 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 230 21-611 61-8" 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 231 21-611 6' - 8" 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR SILL SUR CXWM EEAD OF SEkANT 0E LLS lr;CK ROD ";WTIDN OWN91 R".0 OA RkL Section 1 - Callout 1 3/8" = 1'-0" MAIN FLOOR AIL off1 GARAGE 7" LOWER CEILING I1 -1'-6" Window Schedule Type Mark Width Height Level Comments 160 2' - 6" 51-011 LOWER FLOOR 160 21-61' 51-011 LOWER FLOOR 160 21-611 51-011 LOWER FLOOR 160 21-611 51-011 LOWER FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 6' - 8" 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 2' - 6" 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21- 6" 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 162 2' - 6" 2' - 6" 2' - 6" 2' - 6" MAIN FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 162 162 21-611 21-611 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 21-611 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 168 21-611 41-011 MAIN FLOOR 168 2' - 6" 41-01' MAIN FLOOR 180 21- 6" 61-811 MAIN FLOOR 180 2' - 6" 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR 180 2' - 6" 6' - 8" MAIN FLOOR 181 21-6" 31-0" MAIN FLOOR 181 21-611 31-011 MAIN FLOOR 181 21-611 31-011 MAIN FLOOR 162 21-611 21-611 MAIN FLOOR 162 21-611 21-611 MAIN FLOOR 160 21-611 51-011 2ND FLOOR 160 21- 6" 51-011 2ND FLOOR 160 2' - 6" 51-011 2ND FLOOR 160 21-611 51-019 2ND FLOOR 160 21-611 51-019 2ND FLOOR 182 2' - 0" 41-011 2ND FLOOR 182 21-011 41-011 2ND FLOOR 182 21-011 41-011 2ND FLOOR 182 21-011 41-011 2ND FLOOR 182 21-011 41-011 2ND FLOOR Grand total: 42 DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 GEI TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q W /0 v / L_ U 0 LO C'7 JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A7 SCHEDULES a N 0 N N N L0 BP BP BP BP BP BP o (D- '+r ,l m J } * D , Y r 1 r' _ a' CC m a ❑ r r ? z r X19- EN-G-TRUSSESF J w 0 , 16- ac Lwu :V�- i - Bp- _ W _ m • � I 1 - - - - BP BP IP GIRDER TRUSS BY MANUF - ENG. TR I ES Q BY �� w -j rr ELL ______====�1 j II � � m I I w � �? II l CO � m ENC. T1R�IE BP BP _ BY MANUF m m m BP 2 MAIN FLOOR BP 1 LOWER FLOOR BP As 1/8" = 1'-0" As 1/8" = 1'-0" BP BP a a m m ENG.TRUSSES BY hMUF a LL m LLP9:3 r I -4 qm z LL w , [rm 0 � a i LU m ENC TRU ES MANUF } TRUSS M MANU 3 2ND FLOOR BP A8 1/811 = 1'-0„ m a m w �m w a m DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-226N I I.G TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKNUTSONDESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTIN G STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. U O C'7 JOB NO: 350A8 SHEET NO: BRACED WALL PLAN !Z LD C'7 C'7 co N 0 N N N LO 9 kI SLID BLOCMLM+ G BETWEEN RAFTERS ATTACHED TO TOP PLATES WITH Oda b' 0 C. ALONG LENGTH OF BRACED WALL PANEL For 61: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. F1GURE R602.10.8.2(1)BRACED MALL PANEL CONNECTION TO RERPEMICULAR RAFTERS EMflF GRACED i4OU-IL�LME ,[;C?hF M10L�i'' 5? IEATMEQ a BRACED WALL UNE 4V LON"M BRAOED WA L PMM AT 1"D GE MIWM:D WALL L,lW_ END COM IOM 3 RETUgN PAWL i !" EN D C DNOCrION 2 !LNEATHED aRAf-'ED WDLL LFE 10' MAX I L- r OW BRACED 7 L FAJ'm L. 2!wt- lUOUSLY I ,r _ BRACED VdALL 1ANE W P RE CHAR E k1ENT S IleRuinn 6" edges 12w t-eld pwml- 24- for bracod ,gal Iwha5 s-adhid wih �-y Table R602.3(3) structurallei Pa + � Interior sheathing per (See Section 8604) 37 fvr bnK d mW brmn NmmlMrd wikh Table F _0 ) or 8602_ ) Vafi&s by fastener s=ural d Msume 0_ 24' fDr bnKma wat'ar & shmtNW wdh woad mal par4k 3, ' kvr Ge=ffid wadWme g►mMh#d wiCh suralIWWb i+d ft C%w* _ MOL&DD DEVXZ Fins r IBRACED ¢*tiri CraC*d wN 011lrrld ID @* Cidfw AM YxAL L FWhI rL 917 ft fiXX4ti§N Ofi ftW d kOV ENID C rtXW d Fw SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, I foot = 304.8 MMr I pound = 4.45N. FIGURE R602.10.7END CONDITIONS FOR BRACED WALL LINES MTH CONTINUOUS SHEATHING - 2'-6" MIN_ • . �Fl�eid rrb� d conwrKA 12' ojr, I X70 lb (i stwyj y Ib ) Mira. 81" wood sl ructu ral pawl sI Moura (si rMgb sided lar i S1OC� on bm sidn Jo r 2 st ) UP U111 8d *x 4-ot. (2 sV*s) DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 ENE S I G TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q A-0 U O L0 m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A 9 BRACED DETAILS ,r W P Exterior sheath Mg per 6" edges 12w t-eld ood Wood y, R �-y Table R602.3(3) structurallei Pa + � Interior sheathing per (See Section 8604) Table F _0 ) or 8602_ ) Vafi&s by fastener - 2'-6" MIN_ • . �Fl�eid rrb� d conwrKA 12' ojr, I X70 lb (i stwyj y Ib ) Mira. 81" wood sl ructu ral pawl sI Moura (si rMgb sided lar i S1OC� on bm sidn Jo r 2 st ) UP U111 8d *x 4-ot. (2 sV*s) DATE: 2023-01-27 REVISIONS: ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 ENE S I G TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. Q A-0 U O L0 m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A 9 BRACED DETAILS 3D View 7 4 3D View 9 A10 (6 View 11 4�� L II �� II I� it �I EAU ' 117 f ��I 3D View 6 LIII I�iill NOREEN Ila 3D View 8 5 3D View 10 A10 DATE: 2023-01-27 D DA 7TCTni.TC . REVISED 2023-02-07 REVISED 2023-02-22 REVISED 2023-03-02 ISSUED 2023-03-09 REVISED 2023-05-22 TODD KNUTSON DESIGN 5757 WENTWORTH AV SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55419 P: 612-251-1041 WWW.TODDKN LITSON DESIGN .COM TERMS: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CON- DITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. A-0 U) U 0 Lo m JOB NO: 350 SHEET NO: A10 3d City of Orono F Hardcover Calculation Worksheet `q kFSHO�Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75 -foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total (Square Feet) Example (Garage) (24' x 30') 720 S.F. A S. F. B S. F. C S. F. D S. F. E S. F. F S. F. G S. F. H S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. Y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover S. F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S. F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S. F. (4) Total Lot Area S. F. 11 Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] City of Orono a Hardcover Calculation Worksheet CgkFSHOQ'Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75 - foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A S. F. B S. F. C S. F. D S. F. E S. F. F S. F. G S. F. H S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. u S. F. v S. F. W S. F. X S. F. Y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S. F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S. F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S. F. (4) Total Lot Area S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) - (4) ] % �. "!1� . � - �� w(#M1�"., • i• � n �i _ Y1' � Q � 1R � s. I t J _ �.l Rfa�. . ,�� ` u � `s} � '- >•`�•" l� �! .[. :� F� tiM +its g F/I� f ., •�' , �� � _ , �Y�.'f +45'x' . i_�� �3r. `'" •, - . � � .�,�� � � ��. �, � �` �. WW 12 ��.G'r►r "`'�^ r'` ��i�L 'ir`'�'�}!:.'VF.r +4i4i� l;i'c•�', .C`.i';.�i.. A �- 'Wi., i le 44* 14 A. JD 1A 411 L 16- rA �' C" � h" S = .► F} � ry.la��.r r. Y M k. .1 "tar r 1 �t� � / �'rl P� �S'S�¢s!r'"' �': y� 1' � 1 f• r` , *4--4.i - ";o, U.q Lz�� :.f. • fes,`- F "�i � ��' �ypt�g, ;?;`ski :�� �� � '� _ '` �.:�7 • ria F 7Y� `. � r� � ' � a y,S{�F-` �'���z3�� `�- � �.. , " '' � - ,. �y,913 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, 5 A RESOLUTION GRANTUI G VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZO-N-ING CODE SECTIONS 78-282, 78-305 (B), 78-1288 (B) FILE NO. 03-2917 WHEREAS, Winfield R. Stephens III and Nancy Stephens, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the o-vxners of the property located at 350 Crestview Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 6, 7, and 8, and that part of Lot 5. Block 6 BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, lying south of the north 40 feet thereof. (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-282, 78-305 (B), and 78-1288 (B) to allow construction of a new residence on a property that is 0.455 acres in size when 2 acres is normally required and for the structure to be setback 30' from the front property line when 50' is required, 10' from the side property line when 30' is required and, 30' from the rear property line when 50' is required and also to allow 45% hardcover in the 75-250' zone when 25% is normallv allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2917. 2. The property is located in the LR — I A, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, which requires a minimum lot size of 2 acres. The subject property is 0.455 acres in size. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on August 18. 2003 and November 17, 2003 and recommended Metro Legal Services Inc. Page 1 of 6 BOX 491 r�� 0 o� o CITY of ORONO ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL \`q$ESg0gNO. s Q 7 approval of the lot area, setback and hardcover variances based on the following findings: a. The subject property is 0.455 acres in size when the zoning district requires 2 acres. Also, the adjacent neighborhood in which the property is located has many lots under the required 2 acres. b. The setbacks of the existing home are non -conforming. c. A reasonably sized home could not be placed on the lot without setback variances. d. Over half of the property is unbi ildable due to the 75' required creek setback. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-282, 78-305 (B), and 78- 1288 (B) to allow construction of a new residence on a property that is 0.455 acres in size when 2 acres is normally required and for the structure to be setback 30' from the front property line when 50' is required, 10' from the side property line when 30' is required and, 30' from the rear property line when 50' is required and also to allow 45% Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. go 7 8 in the 75-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed., subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall not increase above the approved 45%. Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non -hardcover surfaces. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 24, 2004). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 y ,in4 S Vee, City Clerk I�, Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 4 of 6 L 0 0 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 5078 Z 04` NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24'' day of November, 2003. 1 Ali rr„ ize T . y ,in4 S Vee, City Clerk I�, Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 4 of 6 L 0 0 ti L`9kESH0 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5078 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this A� of Njer%-r,_, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public mea ALISSA A. WINTERNHEIMER NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expire; Jan. 31, 2006 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this '4�day of 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL DODGE NOTARY PUBLIC - MINME ,OTA MY CWffft oo Expires Jan s1 200;, Notary Public Page 5 of 6 \`9kES80 State of Minnesota ss. County of Hennepin CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5078 This instrument was acknowledsed before me this day of I - , 2003 by Winfield R. Stephens III, husband of Nancy Stephens. OEt�ISE M. LESKINEiI 'SSOTA NOTARY PUBLIC. -gin. 31, 20 •' Cpnu w1on Expres y State of Minnesota ) ) ss. County of Hennepin ) Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of J 60-hbz ', 2003 by Nancy Stephens, wife of Winfield R. Stephens IIl. NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA Notary Public My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005 Paae 6 of 6 CF"�STVIEW AV�'NUE ._................ NORTI-EXHIBIT A 202..90 >-4 i \ i ' co . -------------------i---- r*m . p 00 Rao so' x 0 �V _ p m m Z .D 10 slat, S� , I ' Iz ar S$ V) pCD� ' n ; m n 20.7 rn Ln Ln _ �0:...... 1 V U1 --------------------------------------------------------- '-------- S SOUTH 110.00 • �O S, ALE '' =30' RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2003 CV" OF ORONO . FL L53 -5, 0 12: 44 •913 k� J �Y - -- Er'iiTY REC FEE IA > CC'p`' FEE I CITY of ORONO ori RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. '5078 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-282, 78-305 (B), 78-1288 (B) FILE NO. 03-2917 WHEREAS, Winfield R. Stephens III and Nancy Stephens, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 350 Crestview Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: N \ Lot 6, 7, and 8�aand that part of Lot 5)31ock 6 BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA(lying south of th_e north 40 feet thereof.) (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-282, 78-305 (B), and 78-1288 (B) to allow construction of a new residence on a property that is 0.455 acres in size when 2 acres is normally required and for the structure to be setback 30' from the front property line when 50' is required, 10' from the side property line when 30' is required and, 30' from the rear property line when 50' is required and also to allow 45% 1 rdcover in the 75-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2917. 2. The property is located in the LR — 1 A, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, which requires a minimum lot size of 2 acres. The subject property is 0.455 acres in size. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on August 18, 2003 and November 17, 2003 and recommended Metro Legal Services Inc. Page 1 of 6 Box 491 0 CITY of ORONO ; iii..... RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL approval of the lot area, setback and hardcover variances based on the following findings: a. The subject property is 0.455 acres in size when the zoning district requires 2 acres. Also, the adjacent neighborhood in which the property is located has many lots under the required 2 acres. b. The setbacks of the existing home are non -conforming. c. A reasonably sized home could not be placed on the lot without setback variances. d. Over half of the property is unbuildable due to the 75' required creek setback. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-282, 78-305 (B), and 78- 1288 (B) to allow construction of a new residence on a property that is 0.455 acres in size when 2 acres is normally required and for the structure to be setback 30' from the front property line when 50' is required, 10' from the side property line when 30' is required and, 30' from the rear property line when 50' is required and also to allow 45% Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5078 hardcover in the 75-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed., subject to the following conditions: Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall not increase above the approved 45%. Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non -hardcover surfaces. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 24, 2004). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORO\O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, - 50 7 S Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24h day of November, 2003. EST 'L-inda.,8. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor N Y-� I Property Ovmer(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5078 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of Q&.,r , 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN f":) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this '' day of 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL DODGE NOTARY PU3UC - Mlt�:�_ -OTA Mr COMMission Jan. 31, 2005 Notary Public ...Y� Page 5 of 6 State of Minnesota ss. County of Hennepin CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 507S This instrument was acknowledged before me this -�_ day of olx r" , 2003 by Winfield R. Stephens I11, husband of Nancy Stephens. State of Minnesota ) ) ss. County of Hennepin ) Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day ofc 2003 by Nancy Stephens, wife of Winfield R. Stephens III. i EH DENISE M. LESKINEN , NOTARYPUBIJC.WNNESOTA 5 Notary Public My Ccm^C,-s._" E%cp;m5 Jin. 31, 2. Page 6 of 6 3SoCFPSTVIEW AV''NUE ,, NORTFEXE IBIT A 202.90 5 0\7 R f . , 1 1 , 1 \ 1 I 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 � 9, _ I r n 1 I � Q >R� V 10 stat, �$ 1 N ; ` N 1 1 I ------------------------------------ 1 /r I , 1 I ' 1 1 1 � 1 � 2 C m \ X 20.7 I'�nY 1 � I I 1 --------------------------------------------------------- I ~---- SOUTH 110.00 RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2003 Gay OF ORONO ,SG ALE • i " =30' 1 e 1 1 F x i DO {V t I i I 1 I co €G D ' O o X , ado cn :• - Z o- m 2 C m \ X 20.7 I'�nY 1 � I I 1 --------------------------------------------------------- I ~---- SOUTH 110.00 RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2003 Gay OF ORONO ,SG ALE • i " =30' X3:;.1 ;`3•�� FEB 0 5 2004 prl AE tS T AAA I4 F111 -ES is - SS I� . 1 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR o��L OF TITLES HLNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA CERTIRED FILED ON FEB 0 5 2004 prl AE tS T AAA I4 F111 -ES is - SS 38 05-117-23 13 0012 38 05-117-23 13 0046 38 05-117-23 14 0028 CHRISTOPHER P FLURY JEANNE M BRAUN PAUL O & SHERRY L SKOOG MARGARET B FLURY 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 250 TONKA AVE 3420 BAYSIDE RD UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23 13 0028 38 05-117-23 14 0005 38 05-117-23 14 0030 MICHAEL JAMIESON DALE J & SUSAN O NYHAMMER BILMA LLC NATALIE JAMIESON 3280 BAYSIDE RD 315 CRESTVIEW AVE 295 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0029 38 05-117-23 14 0006 38 05-117-23 14 0031 BARBARA J HUBER BONNIE J BOYLAN WENDY SULLIVAN 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3240 BAYSIDE RD 325 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0030 38 05-117-23 14 0008 38 05-117-23 14 0033 DANA S BRUMITT JOHN W WOJCIK & KIT L WOJCIK BARBARA J HUBER 3400 BAYSIDE RD 3310 BAYSIDE RD 3390 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LAKE LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0032 38 05-117-23 14 0018 38 05-117-23 14 0039 AMY J LAWIN SCOTT D HOCHSTEDLER MATTHEW LAMBRECHT 3405 EASTLAKE ST 290 CRESTVIEW AVE 340 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0035 38 05-117-23 14 0021 38 05-117-23 14 0043 REBECCA LYNN HOLZEM STEPHANIE REIMAN THOMAS R BETZ 3407 EASTLAKE ST 255 CRESTVIEW AVE 300 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0036 38 05-117-23 14 0022 38 05-117-23 14 0052 CHRISTOPHER J LAPPEN KAE PARTNERS LLC BARBARA JOANNE HUBER KALLYN BIALOWAS 1400 MAPLEWOOD DR 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3409 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0042 38 05-117-23 14 0023 38 05-117-23 14 0055 MARK A HUNSLEY NOAH BYSTROM JEFFREY S MELBY NANCY E HUNSLEY CHARLENE BYSTROM 240 CRESTVIEW AVE 3464 E LAKE ST 275 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0043 38 05-117-23 14 0024 38 05-117-23 14 0056 JEANNE M BRAUN THOMAS VERANT JOHN & TRUDY LEHMEYER 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 285 CRESTVIEW AVE 320 CRESTVIEW AVE UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FORT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23 13 0044 38 05-117-23 14 0025 38 05-117-23 14 0057 MICHAEL T LEE JOHN A VERANT LOREN PARKS CATHERINE S LEE CYNTHIA A VERANT 350 CRESTVIEW AVE 3424 EASTLAKE ST 22060 STRATFORD PL LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 38 05-117-23 14 0058 DENNIS LAPPEN 3300 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0059 MICHAEL/GRETCHEN GILBERTSON 375 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0060 DAREN L GROTHAUS ELLE C GROTHAUS 3403 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0061 PHILIP & KAREN SKOOG 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0062 SUSAN A M GOHMAN 330 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0063 ROBIN WEISS GRIERSON 270 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0064 THOMASDRUK NICOLETTE ROGNLIE 3348 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0069 MICHAEL & MARILYN HUTHWAITE 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410016 K C KIMBREL/CHRISTY KIMBREL 400 OXFORD RD ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410017 MATTHEW B STENGLE JODY L REMSING 3225 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410022 MARYANN & JOHN MERIDETH 405 OXFORD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 410023 JOHN D WITHROW JESSICA D WITHROW 425 OXFORD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we)' L }n <qc-C of 3J r->0(54 L) I w 4l� [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner (` Date Property O er Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I (we) r � [print name(s)] [print address] ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM tale O�r�� have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at z-r�e� Cre-4u)ew Aalso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Propedy Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Scanned with CamScanner Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/18/2023 22.5 255 - 2W M ow 1245 240 255 f`a 265 ZT5 2115 Slei X71 295 a i14 t1, 34H 346 )424 09 44 !q 09 3463 445 3322 3348 122 3751 em .1260 -1 1 32411 IIS m Ba side Ra 466 475 Soo I :' trc, Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 350 Crestview Ave This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is fum'shed with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us