Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-15-2023 Planning Commission Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE 16 jig CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION PARK COMMISSION OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request Please complete the following information for City Records Name (please print) Address Present for (from agenda) Name or Number -rM1. 4 n �� ti�1ChTv-i,lik,c4W53?3 -7 (e,*e (� 2. le5/fiAiiii r gift& aVi: AV s iy �-� 53i 3. Y 4. t..! k(t-- 4rt aro //,31 J 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, May 15, 2023, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the Agenda items is available on the City website (www.oronomn.gov) under Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet — located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Matt Johnson Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: April 17, 2023 Old Business: 1. LA23-000017 Murphy & Co. Design, 746 Tonkawa Road, requests variances for hardcover, driveway width, and rear yard setback for an accessory building. (Staff: Natalie Nye) Public Hearings: 2. LA23-000011 Matthew and Susanne Johnson, 1015 Wildhurst Trail, Subdivision/Preliminary Plat (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 3. LA23-000020 Jamie Grant, 3020 Casco Point Road, requests a variance from lake and front yard setbacks. (Staff: Natalie Nye) 4. LA23-000021 Home Reflections, 2691 Ethel Avenue, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Other Items: 5. Update on May 8, 2023 City Council meeting. Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to June 12, 2023 City Council meeting: Mark McCutcheon Sign up for email notifications at www.oronomn.gov — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Mark McCutcheon, Dennis Libby, Bob Erickson, Gary Kraemer and Scott Kirchner. Commissioner Jon Ressler was absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Natalie Nye. Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. OATH OF OFFICE Community Development Director Oakden led returning and new Planning Commission Members Scott Kirchner and Gary Kraemer in the Oath of Office. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Kirchner moved, Erickson seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2023 Kirchner moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of March 20, 2023: Ayes 6, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA23-000002 CITY OF ORONO, 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE AND 1475 SHORELINE DRIVE, VACATION Oakden said this application is to vacate unused right-of-way along County Rd. 15. The City of Orono is requesting to vacate portions of right-of-way. Hennepin County conducted a project and obtained rights- of-way to reconstruct Tanager Bridge. Portions of that right-of-way are no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred the property to the City for the purpose of vacating which is standard vacation process. The land does not serve a public purpose and has no use for City services. Staff is recommending approval. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Richie Anderson, 1449 Shoreline Dr., stated his agreement with the County was, any property the County took on one side, he would get back on the other side, which is the space we are talking about now. I've been waiting since 2020 to get this resolved. I didn't hold them up on price and gave them more property than needed and I've been paying an attorney to get this done. You are not giving us something we did not have an agreement to get. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Libby commented that he had worked closely with the County and a different property owner regarding right-of-way acquisition for this road project. I was very aware of two precedents at that time. When there is a vacation like this, if the County decides it no longer has a use for a property it must pass through ownership of the City before goes to an adjoining property owner for first right of refusal, which is Page 1 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. another precedent. At this point all we are really deciding is whether we are advising Council to approve vacation. I am supportive. Kirchner supports the application. Erickson noted from a motorist and resident standpoint it is a tremendous improvement over what was there before. He appreciates the efforts of the property owner and the county and City staff and everyone working together to come up with a finished product that's top quality. McCutchen moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000002, 1449 Shoreline Drive, Vacation. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 2. LA23-000008 DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS, 1340 VINE PLACE, VARIANCES City Planner Nye said the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and rebuild on the existing foundation which is non -conforming. The lot is substandard in size and is just over maximum hardcover of 25 percent. The proposed home will be larger and taller with adding a second story and roof pitch and a new front porch addition. It is proposed to demolish a 2 -car detached garage and construct a three -car attached garage in a similar location. The lot is not buildable which is a practical difficulty. The proposal would bring hard cover into compliance. In order for the applicant to construct the new home they will need variances from lot area, average lakeshore setback. 75 -foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75 -foot setback and rear yard setback. Staff is supportive of this request due to the practical difficulties. Kirchner asked about expansion of the footprint. Nye said there would be a slight expansion due to a new, larger garage in the same place as the existing garage. David Zweber, David Charlez Designs, Lakeville, explained it was a difficult property because of the location on an inlet and existing setback rules make it nearly impossible to construct anything in conformance. The existing property is in disrepair and new construction will make it a better property. The proposed new home will bring the hardcover down to within conforming levels, he said, and will not be adding a larger footprint per se, but simply stacking some square footage in a two story fashion to pick up the additional area that the client is needing for their growing family. Attaching the garage also will be a much nicer improvement to the existing structure. Because of the location of the neighboring properties, the neighbor to the northwest is significantly elevated over this property and looking down upon the property currently, so adding a story will not block any views. The property to the southeast will not be affected. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. Kirchner said he feels practical difficulties are established and attaching a garage in place of a detached to new construction is not egregious. I don't see any concerns with the project in my opinion. Page 2 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kraemer said it looks like a good addition to the property and getting hardcover lowered overall is good. Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000008 1340 Vine Place, variances. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000014 SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON, 1007 WILDHURST TRAIL, VARIANCE City Planner Curtis said the purpose of the application is to consider an average lakeshore setback variance on the newly oriented lot at 1007 Wildhurst Trail. The existing home at 1003 Wildhurst would remain and is not part of this application. The applicant is in the process of designing a new home for the 1007 lot. The homes on 1003 Wildhurst and 4455 West Branch Road create an average Lakeshore setback line bisecting the center of the subject lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction up to the 75 -foot setback. Approval would be subject to the County approving the pending lot line changes. The applicants have identified the unique lake channel orientation for both the new lot and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch Road to the north as creating difficulties. Applicants are in attendance. Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the properties along the lakeshore channels create an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property which is restricting development near the lake. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether the proposal fits within the character of neighborhood, whether practical difficulties exist, and whether or not there is any lake view impact to consider. Staff recommends approval. Bollis clarified that the proposal would meet the 75 -foot setback but it's the average setback for which the variance is being requested. Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, said there are currently three PIDs on this property. There is a large, undeveloped chunk of land purchased when there was talk of putting seven or eight houses in there and neighbors wanted to keep density lower. So in an effort to reduce the density of this area, his proposal was to bring it down to two lots. And then in doing so, the average lakeshore setback gets connected from the property to the north, and then connects to the property at 1003 Wildhurst Trail that he also owns. Average lakeshore setback was intended to preserve the lake views between neighbors and lake. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. Kirchner said it reminded him of another case a few months ago. In reality, we are looking at a two -lot application here, not a three -lot. McCutcheon said if it was three we wouldn't be talking about this. One house is extremely on the west side but since they are combining, it's a lakeshore lot. Where the house is located now it makes a lot of sense. As you look at the neighborhood to the south they are all about that distance from the lake, so I think it fits the character of the neighborhood. Bollis said it goes back to the intent of the ordinance. I don't think it creates an issue with sight lines. Page 3 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kirchner said the property is heavily wooded. Because of woods I don't even know what sight lines would be there. Libby said staff has done a good job and given us a lot of good information. The applicant has tried to position the house so does not obstruct any other lake views. I'm in favor of this but we still have to have the County to chime in on this because of the subdivision of the lot. Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000014,1007 Wildhurst Trail, variance. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 4. LA23-000015 SWANSON HOMES, 3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT Oakden reported the applicant is requesting a preliminary plat approval to subdivide 3.57 acres into two buildable lots. There's currently one house and the applicant is proposing to demo a portion of the existing house in order to meet the side -yard setback required by a new shared property line between lot one and lot two. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the LR113 family lakeshore residential zoning districts. Both lots will meet the one -acre size and 140 -foot width requirement in that zoning district. Staff feels the proposed lots are consistent with the character of the neighborhood and do not trigger the requirements for conservation design. All drainage and utility easements will meet current City standards and have been preliminarily reviewed by the City engineer. Minnehaha Creek provided a comment that a two -lot subdivision does not trigger their permitting requirements but they may require permitting at time of demo and of construction. Hennepin County has not submitted comments yet but did provide an update that they have no major concerns. The applicant is proposing a shared driveway access off of North Shore. A driveway easement and maintenance agreement should be required with this plat. Staff recommends a 10 -foot easement be obtained along North Shore Drive to support the creation of a potential regional trail corridor. Staff recommends approval of the subdivision with additional requirements before final plat, including a driveway easement and maintenance agreement, 10 -foot trail easement along North Shore Drive and separate sewer connections and demo permits. The applicant is here and can speak to the project. McCutcheon noted the lot is irregular and asked if there had been an attempt to make the lot lines square up with the lake. Blake Swanson, Swanson homes, 1360 Hamel Road, Medina, said they had put a lot of time and effort into the design especially given the existing home. The reason the lot line goes around the home the way that it does is because that's right where the kitchen and the mudroom are. Going straight line through there and also meeting the other requirements would be a substantial slice through a very critical part of the home. We've been working very diligently with staff to try and come up with a plan that meets all of the requirements of the ordinance. It's consistent with a lot of the other properties along this stretch. He said the new lot to be created would be about 100 feet wide which is also consistent with others in the area. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. Page 4 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kathryn Kallas, 3048 North Shore Drive, the homeowner across the street, also asked about the irregular shape of the lot and said it would be helpful to the neighbors to be able to see what's being proposed and how it is going to be situated. She said there is no one currently living in this home and it was not intended to be a living home for someone per the neighborhood discussion, it was seen as a flip that would take place in the neighborhood. Those of us who live in the neighborhood enjoy this space, enjoy the size of the homes and the properties and how it's been configured over the years. Jeff Zitzloff, 1380 Briar Street, said he does not live in the neighborhood but questioned if the lot line between the existing home and the new lot would create a reasonable setback. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. Oakden said that zoning district requires a 10 -foot setback, as proposed with portions of the existing house and patio slated to be removed, the existing home would be a conforming structure relating to setbacks and hardcover. McCutcheon stated his biggest concern was the shape of the lot but he supports the shared driveway for safety reasons. He said if you look at the proposed plat it doesn't make sense but if you look at the zoom out of the houses are pretty close together. Kirchner commented about the building envelope which appears to be adequate. He discussed the struggle to consider denying something like this when someone is asking to develop land in a conforming manner to our existing ordinances. He said it would not be the smallest lot in the area and would be in the middle of lot sizes in the neighborhood. Kraemer stated he finds it a thoughtful subdivision. He likes the fact that they are doing the common driveway for safety and aesthetics. He thinks it fits the character of the neighborhood. It's definitely not a straight property line but there's a lot of crooked property lines in Orono and you can see why this one's required. Libby said he would support the staff recommendation of requiring a maintenance agreement for the shared driveway. He notes that would eliminate a lot of potential problems. The 2040 plan guides this for one acre so we're beyond that on the on the first site and I would tend to be in favor of this. Bollis noted there are other shared driveways in the area which makes sense on a county road. He added it meets all the checkmarks for what the code requires in a subdivision. Kirchner moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000015, 3017 North Shore Drive, preliminary plat with the stipulation that a driveway and driveway maintenance easement be included,a trail easement, drainage and utility easement and additional sewer connection as noted by City staff in their recommendation as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Page 5 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. 5. LA23-000016 CAROLINA CANO-GARNICA O/B/O KESHAV PROPERTIES LLC, 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CUP City Planner Nye said the applicant is to open a new Mexican restaurant at 2160 Wayzata Blvd. West in two vacant spaces in a multi -tenant building with a variety of uses including a gas station. The restaurant will serve liquor which would classify it as a Class II restaurant in the City code which requires a conditional use permit in the B 1 zoning district. No exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The business will be able to obtain a sign permit as long as they meet the City sign code. The building has a shared parking lot with 17 parking spaces allocated for the restaurant where 11 parking spaces are required. Six of the parking spaces in the rear are not striped but are intended to be used for overflow or employee parking. Staff recommends that these parking spaces are striped as well. The City code requires that garbage and recycling containers are closed but does not require having a trash enclosure. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss the possibility of adding a condition of a trash enclosure if the garbage area ever becomes a nuisance or an issue. Staff overall finds that the proposed restaurant meets all applicable conditional use permit regulations. The use is compatible with the surrounding area and is appropriate for the district and for the future land use for this site. Ms. Nye said the applicant was present and available for questions. The applicant, Gustavo Cano-Garnica, 985 Old Long Lake Road, said he was also representing his sister, Carolina, who was ill. He said his family of seven has lived in Orono for 20 years. So there is a sense of community as well as that sense of family hospitality. While most restaurants in the community are mainly fast food places, he said, they intend to offer Mexican cuisine and a memorable dining experience. He said they planned a bright and glossy d6cor and added the restaurant's peak time will be in the evening and so will not interfere with the other businesses in the center. They expect to have around 12 employees with the employees carpooling and are looking into having the remaining parking spaces striped. Libby asked about adequate handicapped parking spots. Oakden said that is a review done by the City's building official. If more are needed or desired that can be addressed through the building official at the time of permitting. It would also be possible to make that a condition to ensure that it's addressed as part of the conditional use permit. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. Richie Anderson said he is a long-time Orono resident and is not part of the application. But he just wanted to talk to the character of these folks that are running this gas station. It's a local gas station, first class, great food already. They're just solid citizens. And if you don't use their place, you should. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Bollis said it looks like a good proposal and does not see any issues. But would like to hear from the other Commissioners. Kraemer also said he didn't see any issues. Page 6 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. McCutcheon wished the applicants luck and said parking could be revisited later if it would become a problem. But otherwise, he is in favor of it. Erickson said Long Lake started requiring dumpster enclosures in the early 1990s and it's gotten to be accepted over time. He thinks that should be a model as to what we should be looking for in this or other restaurant locations. He feels that should be part of the requirement for not just this location, but any other restaurants that come up. Kirchner said he would struggle with looking at this application and trying to apply an enclosure when we have other existing businesses, restaurant businesses within the City. A broader discussion for potential ordinance review rather than trying to apply it to one singular application is appropriate. Bollis said he would be supportive of seeing if the trash site became a nuisance and if so, possibly requiring an enclosure. McCutcheon moved, Kirschner seconded, to approve LA23-000016, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, CUP. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 6. LA23-000017 MURPHY & CO. DESIGN, 746 TONKAWA ROAD, VARIANCES Nye said the applicant is proposing to renovate the existing home at 746 Tonkawa Road including demolishing a detached, non -conforming garage and constructing a new three -car garage nearer the street. Because the proposed garage has its garage doors facing the street the setback requirements increase from 10 to 30 feet. The proposed garage is 10 feet from the rear property line. The applicant is requesting variances for rear -yard setback for the accessory building from 30 feet down to 10 feet and an additional variance for driveway width to allow a 34 -foot driveway with where 20 -foot is the maximum. The applicant is also requesting a variance from overall hardcover. They are proposing to remove hardcover primarily through the removal of the existing driveway to bring the total down from 35 percent to 32 percent which is still over 25 percent. The applicant has identified the significant topographical changes on the property as a practical difficulty. There is a steep grade change from the street to the house making the current driveway unsafe, especially in the winter months. Constructing a new detached garage closer to the street alleviates those issues. Staff is in agreement with the listed practical difficulties and is supportive of the overall hardcover reduction. Staff recommends approval, however, would like the Planning Commission to discuss the need for a three -bay garage versus a two -bay garage. A two -bay garage could further reduce hardcover and reduce the requested variance for the driveway. The applicant is available to answer questions. Dan Demeules with Murphy and CO Design, 235 Lake St. East Wayzata, spoke as the applicant. The goal of the clients is to keep the house in its existing location reusing the foundation and the main floor. They will be adding a new story to create enough bedrooms for the family. The existing garage is closer to the house than is allowed by current code and has a very steep driveway. Moving the garage will make a safer driveway and entrance to the road, he said, adding there is a lot of precedent for garages right up to the street including a closer one just to the south. We are trying to reduce hardcover as much as possible. Page 7 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. There is a lot of paving on the property right now. So we're reducing that and replacing it with green space. Libby asked if the applicant had discussed the changes with the immediate adjoining neighbors. Mr. Demeules said his client has been in contact with them but both are out of town for the winter and were not comfortable signing any support of it until they were able to see the property in person this spring. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Bruce Lee. 740 Tonkawa, said he and his wife own the property to the north. We have a shared driveway easement that would be completely encroached upon if this retaining wall goes up the way it's proposed. That's a mutually -shared easement. It looks like we still would have access to my property, however, when we back out of my garage, we back into that northerly easterly portion of that easement. So we're going to be greatly affected by a wide garage and then a retaining wall that chews up probably two thirds of that easement. He said the driveway does come down at a steep angle. And a lot of that top angle is the only way to get to my property I don't have access because of that eight -foot drop directly into my driveway. Karen Weathers, 750 Tonkawa, the property to the south, said we've got no issues with it. We've not talked to them. But looks like it's conforming from our point of view, and we don't have any issues. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Bollis asked if there had been any analysis done on the easement by staff. Nye said staff was not aware of it and thought the neighbor still had adequate access to their property. They are just learning it would impact their turn -around. Kirchner said it appears there is an easement there and I would struggle to support something that would encroach upon an easement. Todd Irvine, Keenan and Sveiven, the applicant's landscape architect and contractor on the project, said if there needs to be additional pavement left in the lower right-hand corner of the easement area for backout space we could certainly look at doing that. McCutcheon noted the elevation drop and asked if any consideration had been given to rotating the garage 90 degrees so that instead of backing out into the street they would be backing out into the other neighbor's driveway.. I don't know if there's enough room. Mr. Demeules said it was considered but would have required pushing the garage to the north side. Again, there's a lot of great change there. So what we would have had to do is push the garage to the north side Page 8 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. and make it extend almost to where that existing garage is. And we felt like that would just be a really big impediment on the neighboring property because you'd have two full stories. McCutcheon said he would support additional hardcover for the sake of safety but added that since it's a partially shared driveway the hardcover could really be split between two neighbors. Bollis said he did not like the idea that we're affecting the neighbor's safety and turn -around ability. He also pointed out the exhibits depicted a regular passenger car, not a truck or delivery vehicle. Kirchner said that is exactly what he was going to say. It appears a passenger vehicle can be turned around. But what about a larger vehicle? Libby said he felt that there needs to be additional discussions with neighboring property owners. He asked if the easement was recorded. McCutcheon said he would be interested in seeing if it could be made to work to satisfy the neighbor's easement and concerns. He also asked if there was enough data to give guidance on a three -car garage versus a two -car garage. Kirchner said he couldn't see how changing the size of the garage would change its proximity to the roadway. Bollis said he thought a three -car garage was fine. The piece that's missing to me is that easement piece with the neighbor. So I'm not in favor of it, the way it's presented. Bollis moved, Libby seconded, to table LA23-000017, 746 Tonkawa Road, variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 7. LA23-000019 AS DESIGNS, 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE Curtis said the property is located along the Coffee Channel and is completely within the 75 -foot lake setback. The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on the existing foundation with a full two-story design including variances for side lot setback, hardcover, 75 -foot and average lakeshore setbacks. The applicant has identified the existing home location, the lot's orientation to the channel, its small size and the mature oak and maple trees near the channel as practical difficulties supporting their requested variances. Curtis said the lot has no buildable envelope for conforming development. The small lot size and the owner's desire to preserve the mature trees along the channel also create development obstacles. A lot area variance is also required in order to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood. The plan will increase the hardcover from 27.9% to 28.9. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether it is reasonable to permit the further expansion for a second story so close to the property line and whether the second story should be required to be pushed slightly to the south in order to align with the majority of the homes. The applicant is here. Page 9 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Libby said he had received a note from the adjoining property owner concerned about the possible loss of the large trees along the channel. He asked if they had had an arborist look at them. William Moline, 1940 Shadywood, Orono, the applicant, said the professional opinion of people who have looked at the construction was that if we move the house any further, that that would impact the root structure and that could have a catastrophic effect on the trees. And that's why we were recommended to build on the existing foundation. He said he would be willing to have a tree professional look at them as well before any construction. McCutcheon said he saw a lot of advantages to the property owner and the neighborhood of protecting the trees, so I appreciate you trying to keep those trees where they are during the construction process. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. McCutcheon noted other homes in that area had been expanded by building vertically. Alethia Sadowski with A Sadowski Designs said when she saw the trees her goal was to design a home that was modest enough to accommodate the owner's needs and still maintain the existing conditions. She said she thought the trees probably contributed to the stability of the entire channel at that point. She indicated they found out about all the other nonconforming issues along the way. She also said the house is currently not even a full story and a half. Bollis said in his opinion the applicant has demonstrated what we'd like to see in a lot of these applications where you're building on the foundation. It's pretty modest design, and I'm personally for this one. Kirchner said in looking at the floor plan and design he didn't have an issue with building up. They're not trying to put a monstrous house here. The floor plans are very modest. I feel like there is a good -faith effort from the applicant here to truly make this work as closely as possible within the confines there and I feel like they've done a really good job with that. Kraemer said he would agree. Kirchner moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000019, 1940 Shadywood Road, variances as applied. Bollis asked to amend the motion to require silt fencing protection for the large trees during construction. Kirchner and Kraemer accepted the amendment. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS 8. LA22-000058 SHOREWOOD PROPERTIES - MATTHEW TIERNEY, 2305 BAYVIEW PLACE, SKETCH PLAN Page 10 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Curtis said this applicant is unable to be present this evening but has a representative in attendance. The applicant would like to rearrange the lot lines of the subject properties in order to create two regular rectangular -shaped lots. As the lots exists today they are substandard and the L shape of the one lot is not very functional. The resulting lots would still be non -conforming but of a more usual shape. Due to the new nonconformity, the boundary line adjustment does not qualify for administrative approval without prior approval of a variance. No formal action is required this evening, Curtis said, but the Commission should discuss potential issues to be addressed prior to submission of a formal application. She said the proposal could be accomplished in one of two ways and the applicant should be provided the Commission's preferred direction. Bollis summarized that there are two existing lots today accessed primarily off Bayview. This would not change the number of lots but it would make the existing lots more usable and move one access from Bayview to Navarre Lane. Kirchner said he is familiar with the property and is concerned about a possible steep grade for one lot sloping to Navarre Lane. I just worry about are we creating the best possible lot. Any development onto that is going to have some significant retaining walls. Curtis said the home at 3320 Navarre Lane was constructed within the last five years and has a similar grade. Jacob Conklin, a friend of the applicant, said he would attempt to answer questions from the Commission. My understanding from being there, the elevation change is mostly from the line that is drawn for the new division. That is the most change right there. I don't feel there's much elevation change on that lot. Bollis said he appreciates what Commissioner Kirchner pointed out about the elevation. That's something we should definitely look at and make sure we're not creating a problem with this lot line adjustment. But if that is met by the applicant, I don't see a reason why I wouldn't approve something like this. He noted this proposal takes two non -conforming lots and rearranges them into two non -conforming lots that are more suitable for use. McCutcheon said Orono doesn't like flag -shaped lots and the proposal makes sense. To me, it seems like a better situation. Libby asked if it would be possible to create one conforming lot from the two lots. Curtis said that could be done but the applicant cannot be required to combine them. Kraemer said it makes sense to do it like this, it just cleans it up. It does not create any new non- conforming lots. Page 11 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Bollis noted there was no official vote on the proposal at this time it sounds like we're mostly in favor and could approve something like this. I think the sticking point and something they might want to articulate better would be how and where a house could fit on that lot with the typography. Curtis reminded the Commission the application could be handled in two ways. The applicant can make a formal variance application for the non -conformities that have been listed, and then proceed, if approved, with an administrative boundary line adjustment, or they can be directed to make a formal preliminary plat application so they would be re -platting the lots rather than rearranging the lot lines with variances. Commissioners said they thought the variance process would be simpler and the best approach. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION LIASION FOR CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE Oakden explained the Commission annually approves assignments for Commissioners to attend City Council meetings in case there are questions or concerns. She said a schedule was included in the packet. Staff is asking for a motion to adopt the schedule through March of 2024. Commissioners discussed a conflict on the schedule and agreed to exchange assigned dates. Libby moved, Kirchner seconded, to adopt the planning commission liaison schedule as amended. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 10. UPDATE ON APRIL 10, 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Oakden updated the Commissioners that there was one item at the April 10, 2023 meeting and that was a conditional use permit for a golf club parking lot project. The City Council adopted that on their consent agenda. She also said a resident had applied for a planning commission and will be interviewed for the open alternate position at an upcoming planning City Council work session. ADJOURNMENT Kraemer moved, McCutcheon seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:11 p.m. ATTEST: Christopher Bollis, Chair Page 12 of 12 Date Application Received: 03/22/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/24/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 05/17/2023 60 -Day Staff Extension Period Expires: 07/22/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: May 15, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000017, Murphy & Co. Design, 746 Tonkawa Road Variances for Hardcover, Driveway Width, and Rear Yard Setback for an Accessory Building Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for hardcover to exceed 25%, driveway width, and rear yard setback for an accessory building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to remodel the existing home and construct a new detached garage. The remodel of the home will include the addition of a second story, which will meet all code requirements. The applicant is proposing to demolish the current, nonconforming garage and to construct a new detached garage near the street. Due to the topographical challenges on the property, the garage will be 10 feet from the rear/street property line and positioned so that the garage doors face the street. This does not meet the code requirement that states that garage doors facing streetward must meet the primary building setbacks (30 feet). The proximity of the garage to the street does not allow for the tapering of the driveway to meet the maximum driveway width of 20 feet. The proposed driveway width that serves the new detached garage is 34 feet. The applicant is requesting variances for rear yard setback for the accessory structure and for driveway width. Additionally, the applicant is requesting a variance from hardcover. The current property is over the maximum allowed hardcover of 25%. The project proposes to reduce the total hardcover from approximately 35% to 32% primarily through the removal of driveway serving the existing garage. On April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The neighbor to the north at 740 Tonkawa Street, Bruce Lea, spoke in opposition to the project. The original proposal removed a portion of the shared driveway between the two properties. The applicant was amendable to changes and the Planning Commission directed the applicant to work with the neighbor and submit a revised proposal at an upcoming meeting. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to table the request as submitted. The applicant has since met with the neighboring property owner and has revised the proposal (Exhibits A, B, C). The revised plan no longer removes a large portion of the shared driveway allowing the neighbor to fully access his property as he does today. The new proposal maintains the existing shared driveway space and reorients the proposed retaining walls. The impacted neighbor at 740 Tonkawa, Bruce Lea, has submitted a letter (Exhibit D) in support of the revised plans. Staff recommends approval of the revised plans. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the significant topographical changes from the street to the house as the reasoning for the placement of the new garage closer to the street. Constructing a garage closer to the home would create a steep driveway that would be unsafe in the FILE #LA23-000017 May 15, 2023 Page 2 of 6 winter and require more hardcover. The existing lot is over on hardcover at approximately 35% and the applicant is proposing to reduce the overall hardcover to approximately 32%. Due to the topography the garage will be placed so that the garage doors face the street and have a wider driveway width than allowed per code, both of which require a variance. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. A new detached garage in a compliant location would create an unsafe and very steep driveway as well as increase overall hardcover on the site. Staff believes the substandard lot size, lot width, as well as existing building and driveway locations are all practical difficulties when remodeling the lot. Staff is supportive of the new detached garage location and orientation as well as the driveway width. The Planning Commission should discuss the need for a three -bay garage that requires a wider driveway and more hardcover than a garage with two bays. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330—Accessory Building Setbacks: LR -1B District Accessory Building <1,000 s.f. Required Proposed Rear/Street 30'* 10' North Side 10' 19' South Side 10' 12' *Accessory buildings on lake lots with garage doors facing a street shall meet the applicable principal building setbacks for the district Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -1B District Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 15,472 s.f. (0.36 acre) 77 @ 75'/ 77' @ OHWL Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 15,472 s.f. (0.36 acre) Allowed: 3,094.4 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,098 s.f. (13.6%) Existing Hardcover Proposed: 2,919 s.f. (18.9%) Section 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier 3,868 s.f. 5,424 s.f. 4,974 s.f. Tier 1 (25%) (35.06%) (32.15%) • The amended plans maintain more existing hardcover for the shared driveway. The shared driveway space is excluded from the calculations as it serves the neighboring property owner, (City Code 78-1682). Applicable Regulations: Rear Yard Setback — Accessory Structures (Sections 78-330 and 78-1435 The applicant is proposing to construct a new 978 square foot detached garage on the property. Detached garages must adhere to the accessory building setbacks for each zoning district. The property is located within the LR -113 District. While the placement of the new accessory building meets the required setbacks per the LR -113 District, the property is also subject to Section 78-1435 regulating garages on lake lots. This FILE #LA23-000017 May 15, 2023 Page 3 of 6 section requires that accessory buildings on lake lots with garage doors facing a street shall meet the applicable principal building setbacks for the district. This regulation changes the required setback for the new detached garage from 10 feet to 30 feet due to the garage doors facing the Tonkawa Road. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the new accessory building to be located 10 feet from the rear property line due to significant topographical changes on the property making it difficult for the construction of the accessory building to be located elsewhere on the lot. Driveway Width Variance (Section 78-1681) The proposed detached garage is located 10 feet from the rear property line and has three bays. The City Code limits driveway widths to 20 feet at the property boundary. Due to the significant topographical changes on the lot, the new garage is placed closer to the rear property line with the garage doors facing the street. The City Code (78-1681) requires the driveway to maintain the minimum width of the garage doors to extend 15' before tapering. The proposed garage is 39 feet wide and the 10 -foot setback does not allow for the tapering of the driveway to the 20 -foot maximum width. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 34 -foot -wide driveway at the property line where a 20 -foot width is permitted. The existing property has an existing shared driveway with the neighbor that will partially need to remain. The property also currently has a parking pad where the new garage is to be located. The current width of the driveways on the property are similar to what is being proposed. The applicant is required to obtain County approval for the proposed curb cut as Tonkawa Road is a County road. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) The existing property is over the maximum hardcover of 25% per the Stormwater Overlay District. The current property is approximately 35% hardcover. The proposed project will remove portions of the existing driveway and the existing garage. The project will reduce the property's overall hardcover to 32%, bringing it closer to conformance. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variances for the construction of a new accessory building and driveway are supported by practical difficulties. The lot has significant topographical challenges that prevent the new garage to be placed further from the rear lot line. The proximity of the garage to the rear lot line also creates difficulties in adhering to driveway width requirements. The applicant is proposing to reduce the total hardcover on the site bringing it closer to conformance with the Ordinance. This FILE #LA23-000017 May 15, 2023 Page 4 of 6 criterion is met. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in the construction of a new accessory building in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The proposed project will also reduce the overall hardcover on the site which is consistent with the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; Constructing a new accessory building to be used as a detached garage is a reasonable use of the property. The current garage is nonconforming and is served by a steep driveway. The new property owners would like demolish the existing garage and construct a new garage closer to the street while reducing the overall hardcover on the site. The proximity of the garage to the rear property line and the width of the driveway do not meet code requirements. The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties in the steep topography, substandard lot size and placement of existing improvements on the lot. This criterion is met. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The topographical challenges unique to the property were not created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variances will allow the construction of a new detached garage near the street. Many neighboring homes have garages along the street and some neighboring properties have garages with garage doors facing the road. The proposed placement of the detached garage will not alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR -113 District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The substandard size and width of the property along with FILE #LA23-000017 May 15, 2023 Page 5 of 6 the existing structures and topographical challenges are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the specific location of the existing structures on the property and the steep topographical changes are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The current property is served by a steep driveway that is especially unsafe in the winter months. Granting of the application is necessary. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances allow for the construction of a new detached garage without a steep driveway. The project will also decrease the overall hardcover on the site bringing it closer to conformance. The proposal is necessary and not out of convenience. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments At the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Bruce Lea, 740 Tonkawa Rd, spoke at the public hearing in opposition to the application noting concerns about the shared driveway space (Exhibit E). A letter of support from the neighbor from that same neighbor, at 740 Tonkawa Rd, has since been submitted and is included in Exhibit D. The neighbor is in favor of the revised plans. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Planning Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The proposed project to demolish an existing garage and driveway that are unsafe and to construct a new detached garage near the street appear to be reasonable. Staff find there is practical difficulties to support the amended application. FILE #LA23-000017 May 15, 2023 Page 6 of 6 Planning Staff recommends approval of the application as revised contingent on the applicant obtaining a County Right of Way permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Revised Survey Exhibit B. Revised Plans Exhibit C. Revised Hardcover Exhibit D. Neighbor Letter of Support Exhibit E. Draft PC Minutes 4/17/2023 List of References PC Exhibits 4/17/2023 Exhibit F. Application Exhibit G. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit H. Narrative Exhibit 1. Survey Exhibit J. Plans Exhibit K. Hardcover Information Exhibit L. Mailing List & Map DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per C.O.T. Certificate No. 1335777) That part of Lot 11, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn parallel to and 25 feet Southeasterly, measured at right angles from the Northwesterly line thereof, extended, 'Parten's Point First Division", STANDARD NOTES If 2'/- X T @ X a) Fence ties are shown on the / / / / / / / / x 928.0 61� x 928.0 / PC Exhibit A M J I a J side of the boundary line that T(– O 1) Site Address: 746 Tonkawa Road, Orono, Minnesota 55356 x� the fence is located on. /'10 2) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 15,472± s.f. – 0.36 acres Area above ordinary high water V . 4 / ® 3) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: KEEFE MN053 which has an elevation of: 943.01 feet (NGVD29). X FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 4) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1B (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: /' / 932.9 / �1 x 928.0 Stormwater Overlay District TIER 1 -� - vgSLX C Quality - / \ I x 928.0 PC Exhibit A Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 35 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet / +919 Lake: 75 feet or Average Lake Shore setback Height: 30 feet / �\ \ 1 i < I/, � Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area\\ 09��F Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 35 feet for a accessory buildings 17.5 feet for accessory structures c \\ \`g Q � I\� j Side: 10 feet 0 OQ x 932.6 \ 9 \ 9 Lake: 75 feet o2� s x 945.0 \- �R \ \ �\ \ / �i9 O9 '� \9 O o \\\ IJS'z, \ \ \ \ /moi \ / x � Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for \ \ 927.9 rL the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. �� x 945.8 �\ \ �� \� ' \� cL0 < �� We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. i / 9461), I X86 I ��� x 99.4 \ \ �, \ �g32? \ 5) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. �0 l \ k / \ Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject / \ \ �'( \ \ \ e� \ \ s� O property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. x 946.6\ s \ / y� 944.0r�� \ \ \9 \ 6) Grading must maintain a minimum 2% slope gradient to accommodate positive drainage. `• / F x 947.5 � S�� a 9 5 r� \ �� � � /� G � x ice/ /' x 928.3 7) All set offset irons are measured to hundredths of a foot and can be used as benchmarks for construction. \� x \\ �� �OQO "' \' V" . � x 932.28) The proposed driveway shown is conceptual only and does not purport to show exactly how the driveway shall be built. rLS o \ A 5 g e� �� 9 19 9) Proposed grades shown adjacent to building foundation refers to top of black dirt. / \ 12 'lP 2\ S SAS J y �s / / �7 i' 940.1\ \ \ 6' �� x 933.2 10) Verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. \ �( \ k��� \ 26 \ 9 ��� s� �/ i / �i� 9� 9� x 928.0 0 5r \': i is ? l ............. ......... : ...... .::.::.:::.. ::::.:::::::.::::.. ....�........9.................. �....�....,............... .................... _ / / / ��% �.L , �q �J , \ i \ T(– O c LF W � 0 'n SIR, V ® Ir E LAKE _� RD, 9Q ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND -. -� - vgSLX C � ,' 0 YARD LIGHT OO UTILITY MANHOLE GAS—GAS N �� l FOX ITE I SOT LIGHT POLE u❑ UTILITY PEDESTAL oHu Y 96 9 \ n;s�\� p� M C F® FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑V UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE A D �\ ,torch \ \ 4H 0L FD.� P L - , \ �� E,�.��-=I����,�A_���� ' o- �, Bay bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP W WATERMAIN MANHOLE @ > SANITARY SEWER Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 35 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet / +919 Lake: 75 feet or Average Lake Shore setback Height: 30 feet / �\ \ 1 i < I/, � Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area\\ 09��F Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 35 feet for a accessory buildings 17.5 feet for accessory structures c \\ \`g Q � I\� j Side: 10 feet 0 OQ x 932.6 \ 9 \ 9 Lake: 75 feet o2� s x 945.0 \- �R \ \ �\ \ / �i9 O9 '� \9 O o \\\ IJS'z, \ \ \ \ /moi \ / x � Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for \ \ 927.9 rL the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. �� x 945.8 �\ \ �� \� ' \� cL0 < �� We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. i / 9461), I X86 I ��� x 99.4 \ \ �, \ �g32? \ 5) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. �0 l \ k / \ Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject / \ \ �'( \ \ \ e� \ \ s� O property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. x 946.6\ s \ / y� 944.0r�� \ \ \9 \ 6) Grading must maintain a minimum 2% slope gradient to accommodate positive drainage. `• / F x 947.5 � S�� a 9 5 r� \ �� � � /� G � x ice/ /' x 928.3 7) All set offset irons are measured to hundredths of a foot and can be used as benchmarks for construction. \� x \\ �� �OQO "' \' V" . � x 932.28) The proposed driveway shown is conceptual only and does not purport to show exactly how the driveway shall be built. rLS o \ A 5 g e� �� 9 19 9) Proposed grades shown adjacent to building foundation refers to top of black dirt. / \ 12 'lP 2\ S SAS J y �s / / �7 i' 940.1\ \ \ 6' �� x 933.2 10) Verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. \ �( \ k��� \ 26 \ 9 ��� s� �/ i / �i� 9� 9� x 928.0 0 5r \': i is ? l ............. ......... : ...... .::.::.:::.. ::::.:::::::.::::.. ....�........9.................. �....�....,............... .................... _ / / / ��% �.L , �q �J , \ i \ T(– O –9 -" 19,' Z_�—� s9 "41 ® ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND � ,' 0 YARD LIGHT OO UTILITY MANHOLE GAS—GAS UNDERGROUND SOT LIGHT POLE u❑ UTILITY PEDESTAL oHu OVERHEAD UTILITY 96 / C O��yO F® FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑V UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE D ���SF ' bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP W WATERMAIN MANHOLE @ > SANITARY SEWER 9 FLAG POLE ® WATER METER >> STORM SEWER �Oy FUEL PUMP WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND co 6� FT FUEL TANK WELL RETAINING WALL \ 9soo� l PROPANE TANK Mw MONITORING WELL uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND ° �� © GAS METER m CURB STOP WATERMAIN O� X GAS VALVE M GATE VALVE c� TRAFFIC SIGNAL ® GAS MANHOLE "(f HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS \ I \6o cE GENERATOR FIR__vl IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL ® GUARD POST Plv POST INDICATOR VALVE 0— RAILROAD SWITCH ❑H HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH \ 96i \ � 0 MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN RETWALL FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.05 FILE NO. DM AK 1 JPR 12/12/2022 REF. JOB NUMBER 12675-001 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. y RS �� so R1, F Hennepin County CERTIFICIATE OF SURVEY 23570-001 DRAWN 2 EJ/EMW 3/21/2023 PROPOSED CONDITIONSIX STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s � � EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 12th day of December, 2022. 2SAT H R E-BERGQUIST, INC. JPR 3 JPR 4/5/2023 PROPOSED CONDITIONS OUT OF 75' SETBACK AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF � U' O RO N O, PREPARED FOR: CHECKED 4 JPR 5/2/2023 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES m DLS THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY4 NC ��� WWW.SATHRE.COM MINNESOTA ED CALDWELL DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 1'S �P� 12/5/22 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. schmidt@sathre.com P LO o) N 03 ---------- .p, rn 6D NIG; �450 fRESIIDENCE NEW FIELD5TONE RIP -RAP NE IG�H50ZS NORTH FRE ,5 I D N C,--'''' 0 8 16 ---''''- 1/811 = 1 I-011 Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 4751229 Facsimile 952 4751667 DESIGN - BUILD Landscape Architecture I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd Irvine reg. no. 00000 date: 0000/00/00 drawn: TI date: 2023-3-16 revisions: 2023-3-27 2023-3-31 2023-4-26 Landscape Site Plan M 1 1 1 1 1 0 Blue Kazoo Double Play Spirea Arborvitae '4T'34'36"E 211± T-airview 'Juniper #25 Gont. `+9s. Ghic000land Boxwood NE IGH50fR'S RESIDENCE 111.1 I "A ---- rn DO #10 Gont. Armstron 3.5" E3$5 borvitae Ninebark Maple \ \ 1 944.3\ LAWN LAWN +93`x? I I I I 1 x 933 4 \ I I N 933 1 I I I I I I\ -A,933.4\ 1 I I I F -T1 L INV I I I x9 \I I I N t it \ ld Boxwood I I ` \ \\ \� +s I L 4 K I"lINNE TON , (5 TL 55 �3 0,4 r) \-. r7 - JA. J. -r I NEW FIELDSTONE RIF -RAF I " NORTH 1 0 8 16 24 2 flet o � \ 1/811 = 1'-0'I \ \ Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 4751667 DESIGN • BUILD Landscape Architecture I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd Irvine reg. nu. uuuuu date: 0000/00/00 drawn: TI date: 2023-3-16 revisions: 2023-3-27 2023-3-31 2023-4-26 Landscape Planting Plan City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 746 Tonkawa Road Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date SB Job Number: 23570-001 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Tier 1 Step 1: PROPOSED HARDCOVER Prepared by: Tier 2 Tier 3 5/2/2023 JPR Tier 4 Tier 5 In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 1,554 S. F. B Garage(to be removed) S. F. C Bit. Driveway(to be removed) S. F. D Conc. Steps(to be removed) S. F. E Stoop(to be removed) S. F. F Pavers(to be removed) S. F. G Deck and Pavers below 400 S. F. H Retaining walls(to be removed) S. F. I Garage 978 S. F. J Paver Driveway 381 S. F. K Pavers 1,073 S. F. L Stepping Stones 32 S. F. M Porch 387 S. F. N Maintenance Path 151 S. F. 0 Retaining Walls 289 S. F. P Concrete pads 18 S. F. Q Bit. Driveway (doesn't benefit owner) 620 S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 5,883.00 S. F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): Deck Credit 0 S. F. X Bit. Driveway(doesn't benefit owner) 620 S. F. y Retaining walls 289 S. F. Z S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 909 S. F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 4,974.00 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 15,472 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 32.15% % This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. From: Bruce Lea To: Scott Kirchner; ion ressler(cboutlook.com; Bob Erickson; dennisliffy(c remax.net; Christopher Bollis; Mark McCutcheon; Matt Gettman; dpet40131(@gmaJl.com; Gary Kraemer; Natalie Nye Cc: Colleen Lea; Bruce Lea Subject: 746 Tonkawa remodel project update Date: Monday, May 1, 2023 2:33:53 PM Dear Orono Planning Commission, I was contacted by Matthew Walter last week and he provided me with the updated driveway and garage drawings. This change shows the continued access and availability of the driveway easement that is currently in place. I am in support of this new proposal as shown and look forward to your review. Best Regards, Bruce Lea Owner 740 Tonkawa Road 612-701-2921 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Erickson said Long Lake started requiring dumpster enclosures in the early 1990s and it's gotten to be accepted over time. I think that should be a model as to what we should be looking for in this or other restaurant locations. I feel that should be part of the requirement for not just this location, but any other restaurants that come up. Kirchner said he would struggle with looking at this application and trying to apply an enclosure when we have other existing businesses, restaurant businesses within our City. I think that that would be a broader discussion for potential ordinance review rather than trying to apply it to one singular application. Bollis said he would be supportive of seeing if the trash site became a nuisance and if so, possibly requiring an enclosure. McCutcheon moved, Kirschner seconded, to approve LA23-000016, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, CUP. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 6. LA23-000017 MURPHY & CO. DESIGN, 746 TONKAWA ROAD, VARIANCES Nye said the applicant is proposing to renovate the existing home at 746 Tonkawa Road including demolishing a detached, non -conforming garage and constructing a new three -car garage nearer the street. Because the proposed garage has its garage doors facing the street the setback requirements increase from 10 to 30 feet. The proposed garage is 10 feet from the rear property line. The applicant is requesting variances for rear -yard setback for the accessory building from 30 feet down to 10 feet and an additional variance for driveway width to allow a 34 -foot driveway with where 20 -foot is the maximum. The applicant is also requesting a variance from overall hardcover. They are proposing to remove hardcover primarily through the removal of the existing driveway to bring the total down from 35 percent to 32 percent which is still over 25 percent. The applicant has identified the significant topographical changes on the property as a practical difficulty. There is a steep grade change from the street to the house making the current driveway unsafe, especially in the winter months. Constructing a new detached garage closer to the street alleviates those issues. Staff is in agreement with the listed practical difficulties and is supportive of the overall hardcover reduction. Staff recommends approval, however, would like the Planning Commission to discuss the need for a three -bay garage versus a two -bay garage. A two -bay garage could further reduce hardcover and reduce the requested variance for the driveway. The applicant is available to answer questions. Dan Demeules with Murphy and CO Design, 235 Lake St. East Wayzata, spoke as the applicant. The goal of the clients is to keep the house in its existing location reusing the foundation and the main floor. They will be adding a new story to create enough bedrooms for the family. The existing garage is closer to the house than is allowed by current code and has a very steep driveway. Moving the garage will make a safer driveway and entrance to the road, he said, adding there is a lot of precedent for garages right up to the street including a closer one just to the south. We are trying to reduce hardcover as much as possible. There is a lot of paving on the property right now. So we're reducing that and replacing it with green space. Page 7 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. Libby asked if the applicant had discussed the changes with the immediate adjoining neighbors. Mr. Demeules said his client has been in contact with them but both are out of town for the winter and were not comfortable signing any support of it until they were able to see the property in person this spring. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Bruce Lee. 740 Tonkawa, said he and his wife own the property to the north. We have a shared driveway easement that would be completely encroached upon if this retaining wall goes up the way it's proposed. That's a mutually -shared easement. It looks like we still would have access to my property, however, when we back out of my garage, we back into that northerly easterly portion of that easement. So we're going to be greatly affected by a wide garage and then a retaining wall that chews up probably two thirds of that easement. He said the driveway does come down at a steep angle. And a lot of that top angle is the only way to get to my property I don't have access because of that eight -foot drop directly into my driveway. Karen Weathers, 750 Tonkawa, the property to the south, said we've got no issues with it. We've not talked to them. But looks like it's conforming from our point of view, and we don't have any issues. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Bollis asked if there had been any analysis done on the easement by staff. Nye said staff was not aware of it and thought the neighbor still had adequate access to their property. They are just learning it would impact their turn -around. Kirchner said it appears there is an easement there and I would struggle to support something that would encroach upon an easement. Todd Irvine, Keenan and Sveiven, the applicant's landscape architect and contractor on the project, said if there needs to be additional pavement left in the lower right-hand corner of the easement area for backout space we could certainly look at doing that. McCutcheon noted the elevation drop and asked if any consideration had been given to rotating the garage 90 degrees so that instead of backing out into the street they would be backing out into the other neighbor's driveway.. I don't know if there's enough room. Mr. Demeules said it was considered but would have required pushing the garage to the north side. Again, there's a lot of great change there. So what we would have had to do is push the garage to the north side and make it extend almost to where that existing garage is. And we felt like that would just be a really big impediment on the neighboring property because you'd have two full stories. Page 8 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o'clock p.m. McCutcheon said he would support additional hardcover for the sake of safety but added that since it's a partially shared driveway the hardcover could really be split between two neighbors. Bollis said he did not like the idea that we're affecting the neighbor's safety and turn -around ability. He also pointed out the exhibits depicted a regular passenger car, not a truck or delivery vehicle. Kirchner said that is exactly what he was going to say. It appears a passenger vehicle can be turned around. But what about a larger vehicle? Libby said he felt that there needs to be additional discussions with neighboring property owners. He asked if the easement was recorded. McCutcheon said he would be interested in seeing if it could be made to work to satisfy the neighbor's easement and concerns. He also asked if there was enough data to give guidance on a three -car garage versus a two -car garage. Kirchner said he couldn't see how changing the size of the garage would change its proximity to the roadway. Bollis said he thought a three -car garage was fine. The piece that's missing to me is that easement piece with the neighbor. So I'm not in favor of it, the way it's presented. Bollis moved, Libby seconded, to table LA23-000017, 746 Tonkawa Road, variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 7. LA23-000019 AS DESIGNS, 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE Curtis said the property is along the Coffee Channel and is completely within the 75 -foot Lake setback. The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on the existing foundation with a full two-story design including variances for side lot hardcover, 75 -foot and average lakeshore setbacks. The applicant has identified the existing home location, the lot's orientation to the channel, its small size and the mature oak and maple trees near the channel as practical difficulties supporting their requested variances. Curtis said the lot has no buildable envelope for conforming development. The small lot size and the owner's desire to preserve the mature trees along the channel also create development obstacles. A lot area variance is also required in order to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood. The plan will increase the hardcover from 27.9% to 28.9. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether it is reasonable to permit the further expansion for a second story so close to the property line and whether the second story should be required to be pushed slightly to the south in order to align with the majority of the homes. The applicant is here. Libby said he had received a note from the adjoining property owner concerned about the possible loss of the large trees along the channel. He asked if they had had an arborist look at them. Page 9 of 12 From: dwdxCalaol.com To: Natalie Nye Subject: 746 Tonkawa Road - Planning meeting Date: Friday, May 12, 2023 11:58:51 AM Natalie - This email is in regard to the variance requests for 746 Tonkawa Road. We are the neighbors to the south, at 750 Tonkawa Road. We have met with the neighbor and his landscaping contractor. We are supportive of their requests. Karen & David Weathers 750 Tonkawa Road 612-723-0632 Date Application Received: 03/21/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/05/2023 120 -Day Review Period Expires: 08/03/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 15 May 2023 Subject: #LA23-000011, Matthew & Susanne Johnson, 1015 Wildhurst Trail / PID 07-117-23-21-0002 (fka 1003 Wildhurst Trail) Subdivision: Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a front/back lot subdivision to create one new, buildable lot and a private driveway outlot. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. BACKGROUND The subject property was part of a recent administrative boundary line adjustment to move the existing eastern property line to the west, approximately 80 feet (LA23-000018). The property is a 9.29 -acre parcel (405,020 square feet) located within the RR -1B one family rural residential zoning district. The heavily wooded site has sloping terrain and includes a small wetland. Building pads and site grading have not been proposed at this time. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW General Site Characteristics This site is within the rural residential area east of the City's Saga Hill Park Preserve, northwest of Forest Lake, situated between smaller lakeshore lots and larger, wooded rural properties. The property abuts an existing undeveloped right-of-way on the south. The property contains natural wooded areas as well as sloping grades and a wetland. There are no areas of bluff on the property. The site is currently undeveloped, although an old foundation exists on proposed Lot 1 from an old building. Lot Areas Wetland Dry Buildable Total Existing Property ±0.03 acre ±1,550 square feet ± 9.29 acres ±9.26 acres Lot 1 - Proposed ±0.03 acre ±5.0 acres ±5.0 acres Lot 2 - Proposed NA ±4.0 acres ±4.0 acres Outlot - Proposed ±10,991 square feet / ±0.25 acres Note, proposed Lot 1 is shown meeting the minimum 150% acreage and setback requirements for the RR -1B district as a "Back Lot". 2020 - 2040 Orono Community Management Plan The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Rural Residential Density, one unit per two acres (0.5 units per one acre). The proposal involves creation of 2 lots with a calculated density of 0.2 units per acre based on the gross area. Today the parcel is considered one buildable lot. The application is proposing two buildable lots which results in more density than the current condition; the application moves the property closer to the guided density within the 2040 Comprehensive FILE #LA23-000011 15 May 2023 Page 2 of 4 Plan. According to the General Land Use Goals and Policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan, the City will reinforce environmental protections with a focus on the existing lakes in the community. The City will also maintain the historic identity and character of the separate urban and rural neighborhoods. Conformity with RR -113 Zoning District Standards The property is currently zoned RR -113 One Family Rural Residential (requiring a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres). The delineated wetland on the property is located within a required yard area and does not impact available buildable areas of either lot. The property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); the properties will be served by City sewer. The front lot/back lot configuration proposed conforms to the additional requirements for lot size and setbacks 150% of the RR -113 district requirements. A 30 -foot wide, private, shared driveway outlot (Outlot A) is proposed to serve as access for both properties off of Wildhurst Trail. Relationship to Surrounding Development The immediate neighborhood consists of % acre to 10 acre lots; the City's Saga Hill Preserve Park borders on the west side of the property. The areas to the east and south of the property are defined as "Urban Areas" and are zoned LR -113 Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre minimum). The properties to the north are defined as "Rural Areas" and are zoned RR -113 Rural Residential District (2 acre minimum). The site is heavily wooded with sloping grades and a wetland on the property. The shared driveway and front lot/ back lot configuration promote less intrusive development maintaining the rural nature of the land. The proposed subdivision is consistent with respect to the rural character of the surrounding neighborhood. Conservation Design The requirements of the conservation design ordinance are meant to preserve and enhance the natural, ecological, and aesthetic character of the area. The need for a conservation design analysis is triggered by development of properties over 5 acres in size or with increased/urban density. The proposed project requires a conservation design plan. The Conservation Design Report by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (Exhibit E) provides a more detailed overview of the natural site characteristics. The plan indicates the developer's intent to protect significant tree stands; removal of dead or diseased trees will be done on an as -needed basis. The goal of the development scope is to minimize density, tree removal, and clearing. Although there are no notable recommendations, Planning Commission should review the Report and discuss the recommendations. Utilities The properties are proposed to be served by City sewer and private water supply wells. The applicant is proposing to connect to the City's sewer in Wildhurst Trail; an existing sewer maintenance hole (manhole) exists on the property owned by the applicant to the east. The applicant should prepare a sewer plan for the final plat review. The applicant shall grant utility easements in favor of the City over any portions of public sewer extensions not existing within a platted drainage and utility easement. Further, the applicant should consider establishing easements over private sewer connections across private property. The City Engineer noted a separate sewer connection will be required for the new lot; shared connections are not permitted. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) provided comment stating a 2 -lot subdivision does not trigger their Rules. Although the project does not currently trigger the MCWD's FILE #LA23-000011 15 May 2023 Page 3 of 4 Stormwater Rule, permits for Erosion Control and Stormwater Management may be required at the time of development for each of the new Lots. The District issued a Notice of Decision regarding the wetland delineation (Exhibits C & D) and is not requiring buffers with the plat however, development on Lot 1 may trigger the need for a wetland buffer in the future. Hennepin County Hennepin County was asked to comment on the proposed subdivision. They responded with the email attached as Exhibit G indicating they do not have comments on the proposal. Stormwater Quality Overlay District The property is within Tier 3 of the City's Stormwater Quality Overlay District limiting total site hardcover to 35% of the lot area. As each of the lots exceed 1.99 acres in area there is no limit on overall structural coverage. Drainage and Utility Easements The City requires standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries on the Plat and drainage easements over the wetland areas and 25 -foot setback from the wetland. The easements are not shown on the proposed preliminary plat drawing; the Final Plat must meet the City's standards. In the future, Drainage and Utility Easements should be required over any stormwater facilities that are required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Private Driveway Outlot The new lots are proposed to be served via a private driveway within a 30 -foot wide outlot. Drainage and Utility easements should be granted over the entirety of this outlot on the plat. Access easements shall be provided over the outlot for driveway purposes benefitting both of the proposed lots. A maintenance agreement for the private driveway should also be provided by the developer. Park Dedication A developer shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes an amount of land proportional to the amount of land being developed and to the number of residential units or commercial industrial employment, as set forth in City Code Section 82-226 in the amount of 0.1 acres of land per residential dwelling unit. The Parks, Open Space and Trail Plan chapter of the Orono Comprehensive Plan does not specify the need for a neighborhood park or a trail at this location which may specifically require dedication of land from this property. Saga Hill Park Preserve is connected to Wildhurst Trail via an undeveloped right-of-way. The Park Fee Cash contribution requirement is equal to the amount of land required to be dedicated. In instances where a cash contribution is to be made in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the land to be dedicated. For the proposed development, the estimated Park Fee is based only on the newly created lot. The Park Dedication Fee for this project is estimated to be $6,391.82. The County Assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land for establishing the amount of the fee. Stormwater Drainage Trunk Fee FILE #LA23-000011 15 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Stormwater trunk fees apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties and provide funding for the storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the City. The trunk fee is based on the land use and acreage of the property being developed. The Stormwater Drainage Trunk Fee for this project is estimated to be $8,060 per lot or $16,120 total. The Stormwater Drainage Trunk Fees are established by Section 14-283 of the City Code. City Engineer Comments The City's Consulting Engineer, Bob Bean, has reviewed the plans for the preliminary plat. Mr. Bean's comments were primarily advisory and are attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to develop the property in a reasonable manner? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the subdivision, if approved, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Planning Commission should review the Conservation Design Report and provide recommendations. 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the City Engineer's requirements. The Planning Commission's options for action on the proposed plat are as follows: • Recommend approval of the preliminary plat as presented, with appropriate conditions; • Recommend denial, stating reasons; or • Table the application providing direction and guidance to the developer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Proposed Preliminary Plat Drawing Exhibit C. Wetland Delineation Report Exhibit D. MCWD NOD Exhibit E. Conservation Design Report Exhibit F. City Consulting Engineer Comments Exhibit G. Hennepin County Comments Exhibit H. Resolution No. 7327 Exhibit 1. Sewer Layout Exhibit J. Aerial Photos Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map References 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2023 Fee Schedule Application #LA23-000018 4/17/23, 2:51 PM Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Letter View Land Use Application Summary 03/21/2023 1003 Wildhurst TRL Orono, MN 55364 0711723210002 LA23-000011 Agent on behalf of property owner Name: CHRISTOPHER D MORGART Address: Wendy Williamson Name: SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON Applicant: Company: Address: 1003 Wildhurst Trl Mound, MN 55364 matt@minnetonkamatt.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON matt@minnetonkamatt.com Associated Contact: Luke Severson lukeseverson@gmail.com Associated Contact: Dave Pemberton 45northsurveying@gmail.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Create 2 lots were 1 exists Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision O Concept Application ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application O Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application ❑ file:///C:/Users/meurtis/Download s/Land Use Application Summary (1).htm 1/1 \ I �N��E� �C F ER SSW/40}`NEL`4OF_/ i / _�w 4 OFiSEC-7�N�NW,CORNE / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ E�LAND� y / I I n r / �r P�rMQU;NTIHOME PAR} \ \ \ \ \\I I 4' \ \ \ � n \ \ \ \ \ W WETS DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ' '�' L -1 '� 1 \x _ 0 / / / / / / / �j5 \ W T - �/� --N. LINE OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC.7 / / \ \ \ SET R,L.Sk40344 \ \ \ \ WETLAND / PP \ \ \ _ �. � -,., _ /. S88°17'15" 588.76 , � / / / , - _ _ � ; � �,♦ \ , \ _ / \ \ \ \ \ 96.24., I s R I `\ \ ET 2' �,M \ — FIP 1/ WE / ' \N _ - 97.021 - - — \ \ \ \ \ I \MOWE\\AIL WET \ WET \ $k�•c� / / / 80.00 e� — -- ---- — \ soy 62 N88°17'15„W I I M— — s r1 \ S69e �•`¢ \ / / / / I / /.I/ / \ Y �V \ \/32'16”\�4� � / / \ \ �- ' \ \ \l \ F N83e55' 47"E / / — / / � 30 9 60 A / �4 1 _ / \^ KL , ` ` • ��.�-61—BSL-898L—BSBL—BSBL—BSEL—eSBL �L �BSBL=BSBL—BSEL —eSBL-958E—eSBL �— QFC \ ` `� `���� \I i �B� —�� �L�� e�� -�` — - 7 - = - I/2' OPEN \ \ \ \ / - / Z r / 1 e -. I I \ \ \ I I \ \ \ 964- 9.40 / / I \ / \ y / GL OF ec 11 \ v V v V / I �� I }l (D 1 \ I - I O Ld LOT _ I / SGS � — ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ � �- r�\ I I I I / / / / I W 'N / �I I `7S \ \ \ \ I W � I L0 I - r - —�(p(k I- _- / - \ LL,I PP I L J \ \ I —— 960 \\ \ \ \ \ `/ / \ I _ I _ .,/ /g — — \ \ I I\ a- � L 1 - — \ \ \ \ ! \ \ \ 1 I \ Z LL — — — — O TN 1 \ I45 T(J) �- a . , � 0 — 6 — — — 45f-- � \ \ \ � _ \ 9 \ oma Z — — \ ` \ _ \ T " — \ Bs� I �89&,esK,,_BW L— - eseL—eseL— _ _ 6SBL_05BL_- %`658� S88°1715"E /I 18 \ \ \ \ —BSBL 658L—ML-6SOL— /—I-�JI- -Z,_ \\ �\ \� \\\ \\ \ I x \ I - 3000 I� _ -- /\ CO / LL \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I / N LL_ I / 44,7 / ��2 \—/ T \ 58.49 1 I rn / / i 942 — 3 i -- DO co � I 0 U)— � I L _L J/Z SGN I \ \� > Z �O _ _ I Irl I V A \ \ V \ \ V I I L(� \O I I ��` j �I FIP 1/2, \ \ \ \ \Ld \ I�——e�L—eSaL-9sa eseL\ ��—Bs� �1 \ ` \ I W Z (n / 942 6 \ / B50L—BSBL— L-6$OL BSBL— _ AC BSBI. A � �L—B50L—B50L-6�L� -I \ BSet --650E—OSBL a50L—eseL-650L.�Bsa—eseL—Bsa—eseL— Lf� Ln 1 / `i438 < I /�- -3o- \ \ \ r \� \ \ z Q 1\\ / - T <� / \ U) �\\\�\\ \-1'99 �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ � �'� �v -7, 0. 934—\ \ \ ` ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 O / I - .. WET 2 \\� I— —\\\\ \\\\ \\ \ \ �`�-\- SOI/9 /y / 93�€� \\ �--- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \- \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I \ �/ ,y / Q) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / r WET - ZA - ,. r. N\ \ \ -SGN— -t \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ OT \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 960 \ \ \ \ �f I 6� I I / I WET ��bl WETLAND I cV 3/ I� - \>o \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 DO/ \ V I �;;�I- \ 3 0 /00 � .— . \_ \ \ \ \ I I lit/ �0 - ----I I- \ \ \ , — \ �L = 688L�65BL�056L�0ygJ$ 65BL\ 658L�65BL \_ O \ \ \ I I A A\ -'0 \ V A V V0 A \ —�6se� eset�—s—esa� A I 'I I WET - 0 4 \_ \ I \ O \ 90 \ \ \ \ \ \ \-���-� 650E—{+ !�/ p O :' y° \ \ 6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I / WETLAND 141 \ \ o\ \ \ J \ h \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I III I I I \ R� \ -�- -�- �— — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �� 1 I I I I I I I I I I J o SET L.S.#40 4 A I r- WET \ 74 � \ 634.75 \ \ � -�� � �—}- � I z I SGN M o \ FIP R4S# \ \ _ RR \ I j I �II 3.00 M � \ \M \ \ \ \ \ \SGN �`-'`-'°,25'2"� 664.75\ I kv�E 1 I I I kIP >w/2' OPEN S. LINE OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1%4 OF SEC.7� �. o I I I' \ -� \ \ \ -��F•� I I I / I \ D VE O I I I I I I I I'7 V RIM -9322 p J INV -924.1 r, / 30 30 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I IT—/ \ \ EIJ) I I I I / I \ FIP RL I I 1 \\\\ I I I I \ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I IF ILLS# \ ,/ DP \ / I 12"PVP STORM PIPE / n \ 11 r- \\/ {' % / _ I I I I I I I III �' /A� F < I \I �n1 �/ I I I \ I I I 1 r N I I \/ I V I \/ \ V\ I L_ V V J \ /\ / ]� '/ IV I I \ \ 1 \ \ I V V I L _ L �0 LEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS O SURVEY MONUMENT SET FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION CONCRETE 0 SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION A SURVEY CONTROL POINT TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. —X—X— FENCE Q FLARED END SECTION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. BSBL BUILDING SETBACK LINE N GATE VALVE © COMM. PEDESTAL �-9725 - CONTOUR EXISTING .L GUY WIRE © COMM. CONNECTION s�25 CONTOUR PROPOSED HYDRANT TRANS ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER —_____— GUARD RAIL LIGHT POLE (E ELECTRIC MANHOLE DT DRAIN TILE LANDSCAPE LIGHT ELECTRIC METER ELC ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND POWER POLE © GAS METER CTV COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND © GAS MANHOLE FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SMH� SANITARY MANHOLE N GAS VALVE GAS GAS UNDERGROUND co SANITARY CLEANOUT 0 HAND HOLE OHU OVERHEAD UTILITY ® STORM DRAIN - ROUND 0 SOIL BORING CL RAILROAD TRACKS ® STORM DRAIN - SQUARE TREE CONIFEROUS > SANITARY SEWER STMH � STORM MANHOLE » INV= INVERT ELEVATION TREE DECIDUOUS STORM SEWER = SIGN OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND x9�2.s GROUND ELEVATION a==— TRAFFIC SIGNAL AC ❑ A/C UNIT I WATERMAIN OU UTILITY MANHOLE WELL ❑u UTILITY PEDESTAL Q CURBSTOP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 306.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. Area: 405,019± sq. ft.- 9.30± acres NOTES 1) Site Address: 1003 Wildhurst Tr, Orono, MN 55364 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No.27053C0824F , effective date of November 4, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 405,020 s.f. - 9.298± acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on Hennepin County Control Station: FOREST which has an elevation of: 945.54 feet (NAVD88). Contours shown hereon were derived from a combination of field observations and LiDAR data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR -1B (One Family Residential District) per the City of Orono's zoning map.: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s) Side: Rear: Lake: Wetland: Height: 50 feet ( xxx Road) 30 feet 50 feet 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) 25 feet or MCWD buffer. 30 feet Hardcover: xx percent of lot area * A Zoning Classification Letter from the client must be provided to the surveyor. All zoning, setback information and hardcover information shown here on must be verified by all parties involved in the planning and design process for this project. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 6) Utilities: Underground utilities shown hereon are by observed evidence only. We have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. It is the clients responsibility to create a Gopher State One Call ticket. Seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION The wetland delineation was performed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. and was flagged on August 10, 2022. PROPOSED EASEMENT INFORMATION BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT AND BLOCK LINES AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY/OUTLOT LINES, UNLESS AS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON. STREET NAME PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION Lot 1: 217,811+/- sq. ft. - 5.000+/- acres Lot 2: 176,218+/- sq. ft. - 4.045+/- acres Outlot A: 10,991+/- sq. ft. - 0.253+/- acres 1 45 NORTH LAND SURVEYING 13401 Preston Road Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Tel: 612-597-0453 www.45NorthLS.com 45NorthLandSurveying@gmail.com 0 0 50 100 1 SCALE IN FEET Bearing shown hereon are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD83-1986). Plat bearings are localized to this bearing basis. VICINITY MAP LLK p/ W Bra � 47 SITE °sae Forest Lake HENNEPIN COUNTY TWP.117 RNG.23. SEC.07 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILDHURST WOODS PREPARED FOR: MATT JOHNSON CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 21 day of March, 2023. \ David B. Pemberton Minnesota License No. 40344 SUBMITAL/REVISION Original Survey: 3/21/2023 LEGAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY THE CONTRACT CLIENT HAS AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE/USE THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY OR CADD FILE IN ITS CURRENT FORM FOR ITS ORIGINAL INTENDED PURPOSE. ANY SUBMITTAL OF THIS SURVEY TO ANY 3 PARTY FOR PERMITTING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE MADE ONLY IN THE NAME OF THE CLIENT, OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE AS NAMED HEREON. THE MODIFICATION OF THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY/ EXHIBIT OR CADD FILE IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM 45 NORTH COMPANY, LLC. SHEET I OF I 1003 Wildhurst Trail City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Matt Johnson by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2022-130) October 11, 2022 1003 Wildhurst Trail City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY.......................................................................... 2 2. OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................ 2 3. METHODS.............................................................................................................................. 3 4. RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information .......................................... 4 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 6 4.3 Other Areas........................................................................................................................ 7 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 7 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION.............................................................................. 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data 1 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN 1003 Wildhurst Trail City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY Wetland Delineation Report • The 13.42 -acre Wildhurst Trail parcel was inspected on August 10, 2022 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed one PEM 1 A, one PEM 1 C and one PEM IF/L2ABH wetland complex within the site boundaries. • The soil survey showed Muskego, Blue Earth and Houghton complex (Hydric), Klossner (Hydric), Keskego and Houghton Complex (Hydric), and Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex (Partially Hydric) as the hydric soil types mapped within site boundaries. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed DNR Public Water: Forest (27-139P) within the eastern portion of the site boundaries which continued offsite towards the southeast. • The National Hydrography Dataset showed one Lake/Pond adjacent to the southeast side of the site boundaries, and a Stream/River approximately 50 feet north of the site boundaries. • Four wetlands were delineated within site limits as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on 1003 Wildhurst Trail site. 2. OVERVIEW Wetland Type Wetland Dominant Area ID Circular Cowardin Eggers and Reed Vegetation (ac) 39 Wet meadow that Cattail reed 1 Type 2/3 PEM 1 B/PEM 1 C transitioned into a 0.46 shallow marsh canary grass Seasonally flooded Reed canary 2 Type 1 PEM1A 0.05 basin grass Seasonally flooded Reed canary 3 Type 1 PEM1A basin 0.02 grass Shallow marsh that 4 Type 3/5 PEM 1 C/PUBH transitioned into an Cattail 0.41 open water wetland 2. OVERVIEW 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report The 13.42 -acre 1003 Wildhurst Trail parcel was inspected on August 10, 2022 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 7, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was located on Wildhurst Trail, approximately 1500 feet north of the intersection of Wildhurst Trail and North Shore Drive (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Hennepin County PIDs [07-117-23-21] 0002 (10.09 ac), 0007 (1.66 ac), 0006 (0.41 ac) and 0016 (1.26). This was a multi -parcel site that included one single-family home, deciduous woodland and wetland. Surrounding land use was single-family residential, with Saga Hill Natural Area to the west and Forest Lake to the east. Four (4) wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. Figure does not represent an official survey. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of En i� Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper -most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland -upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located with a sub -meter accuracy GPS unit. Figure 2 does not constitute an official survey product. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland - upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30 -foot radius for trees and vines, a 15 -foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5 -foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.3, 2018). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non -Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non -Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2020 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2020. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed one PEM IA, one PEM 1C and one PEM IF/L2ABH wetland complex within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Muskego, Blue Earth and Houghton complex (Hydric), Klossner (Hydric), Keskego and Houghton Complex (Hydric), and Hamel, overwash- Hamel complex (Partially Hydric) as the hydric soil types mapped within site boundaries. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. 4 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report Table 2: Soil types mapped on the 1003 Wildhurst Trail parcel. Symbol Soil Name Acres % of % Hydric Area Hydric Category Muskego, Blue Earth, and L 16A Houghton soils, ponded, 0 to 1 1.3 9.09% 100 Hydric percent slopes L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel 1.1 7.69% 45 Partially hydric complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes L40B Angus -Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 2 13.99% 5 Predominantly percent slopes non -hydric Lester -Kilkenny complex, 6 to Predominantly L41C2 10 percent slopes, moderately 3.5 24.48% 5 non -hydric eroded Lester -Kilkenny complex, 10 to Predominantly L41D2 16 percent slopes, moderately 5 34.97% 5 non -hydric eroded L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1.1 7.69% 100 Hydric 1 percent slopes L50A Muskego and Houghton soils, 0 0.2 1.40% 100 Hydric to 1 percent slopes W Water 0.1 0.70% 0 Non -hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed DNR Public Water: Forest (27-139P) within the eastern and southeastern portions of the site boundaries, which continued offsite towards the southeast (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Lake/Pond adjacent to the southeast side of the site boundaries, and a Stream/River approximately 50 feet north of the site boundaries (Figure 6). 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on August 8, 2022. Four (4) wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and their adjacent uplands reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, herbaceous vegetation was actively growing. Precipitation conditions were atypical (dry) based on the three- month antecedent precipitation data and drier than normal based on 30 -day rolling precipitation data (Appendix Q. Wetland I was a Type 2/3 (PEM 1 B/PEM 1 C) wet meadow wetland that transitioned into a shallow marsh wetland. The shallow marsh portion was dominated by cattail while the wet meadow wetland portion along the fringe was dominated by reed canary grass with lesser amounts of jewelweed and bittersweet nightshade. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included the FAC -Neutral test and geomorphic position. Adjacent upland consisted of woodland dominated by a canopy of basswood and American elm trees with an understory dominated by common buckthorn. Other adjacent upland consisted of manicured lawn dominated by Kentucky bluegrass with lesser amounts of common plantain and ground ivy. No free water or saturation was observed within the upland sample borehole, nor were any secondary indicators of wetland hydrology observed. The wetland boundary corresponded to a change in topography and changes from a hydrophytic vegetation to an upland plant community. Wetland 1 was shown as a PEM 1C wetland on the NWI and is mapped as Muskego, Blue Earth and Houghton complex (Hydric) according to the soil survey. Wetland 1 continues offsite to the south and coincides with DNR Public Water: Forest (27-139P). Wetlands 2 and 3 were both Type 1 (PEM 1A) seasonally flooded basins that were dominated by reed canary grass with lesser amounts of stinging nettle and bittersweet nightshade. No free water or saturation was observed to a depth of 30 inches below the soil surface with each sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included the FAC -Neutral test and geomorphic position for both. Adjacent upland of both areas consisted of woodland dominated by a canopy of quacking aspen trees with an understory dominated by common buckthorn shrubs, Virginia creeper and hog peanut. No free water or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed in either upland soil borehole. The wetland boundaries corresponded to changes in topography and changes from a hydrophytic vegetation to an upland plant community. Wetland 2 was shown as a PEM1A wetland on the NWI and mapped as Klossner (Hydric) according to the soil survey. Wetland 3 was not mapped on the NWI and was located in an area mapped as Hamel, over -wash hamel complex (Partially Hydric) according to the soil survey. No inputs or outflow were observed at either wetland. 6 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report Wetland 4 was a Type 3/5 (PEM IC/PUBH) shallow marsh wetland that transitioned into an open water wetland. The shallow marsh portion was dominated by cattail, while the open water portion was unvegetated. Inundation was present throughout the shallow marsh, as well as in the open water wetland. Wetland 4 continued offsite to all sides and was part of DNR Public Water 27-139 (Forest). 4.3 Other Areas A wetland labeled as a PEM IC/PEMIAd complex on the NWI map was just offsite to the north. The wetland line was located at its closest points to the site boundary and was determined to be offsite on Figure 2. No other areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Will Effertz, Soil Specialist Report prepared by: Will Effertz, Soil Specialist Marty Anderson, Project Assistant Report reviewed by: Date: October 11, 2022 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) Feet Orono, Minnesota �Y Note: Boundaries indicated jL,HA 'V �O T u A T TG on this figure are approximate FNVIRON MENTAI. SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. ►r►r Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS G n �e4 pHrgW - _ �ty�21y�, m V CR 19 W Branch Rd �lYest Ar�fidl�.d ■ W -I Bf6n[h Raid ■ -' Fsr a� ■ L L `) l? lake d114C 7 n 2 n Forest Lake C b CR 19 ■Sl 14, 11 awe Legend I ae�e� Site Boundary a © OpenStreetMap (an conn u ors, A Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) Feet Orono, Minnesota �Y Note: Boundaries indicated jL,HA 'V �O T u A T TG on this figure are approximate FNVIRON MENTAI. SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. ►r►r Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS ,9 cor0 a 0 Cl) 964 . '+..rte i64 940 Legend Offsite wetland lin,. Wetland Boundary Site Boundary Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory I A 250 Feet KjoL1 AuG FNVIR0NNTF.NTAI. SFRVICF5 CONIPANY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. E A Figure 4 - Soil Survey 250 Feet KjoL1 AuG FNVIR0NNTF.NTAI. SFRVICF5 CONIPANY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. R�4P.. • *, * ., ;. Unnamed (27-945 W) Minnetonka -North Arm (27-133 ray' ,r. Unnamed (2x1095 W) q- s� f 4r 0- Minneton A.. r aF tis. -. 4 w y •. Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Legend Site Boundary Public Waters N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) I i Feet Orono, Minnesota b�l Note: Boundaries indicated �rOT u A T TG on this figure are approximate j L,HA FNVIRON MENTAI- SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. -f►rr �Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS �, 'N - '• - r ,. a wry � Unnamed r 1w14 (27-944.W) f ° a A.. r aF tis. -. 4 w y •. Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Legend Site Boundary Public Waters N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) I i Feet Orono, Minnesota b�l Note: Boundaries indicated �rOT u A T TG on this figure are approximate j L,HA FNVIRON MENTAI- SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. -f►rr �Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS L I _ a � • x � wp: �� A nay` � �� � E WN , — ; •• G k ;" pv"MOW �.. ' � N alb,..h .tea �'�` r ���� i. � .�";'. �'��. •�a� � _.� .. � e� � ` •� � ` - rq:. I L p4 f{{f 1. . .' �k- / Site Boundary o Hydro Junction r..,. Artificial Path 'f 4. - _ Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) I I Feet Orono, Minnesota �Y A. Note: Boundaries indicated 'V rO T u A T TG on this figure are approximate KL,HA j FNVIR0N K4ENTAI- SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. ►r►r Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS Legend / Site Boundary o Hydro Junction r..,. Artificial Path 'f — Stream/River - _ Lake/Pond Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset N 0 1,000 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) I I Feet Orono, Minnesota �Y A. Note: Boundaries indicated 'V rO T u A T TG on this figure are approximate KL,HA j FNVIR0N K4ENTAI- SFRVJCF5 COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. ►r►r Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland, tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota under state and federal regulatory programs. Applicants for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form (see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information). This form is only applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs; other local applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over different types of resources. Regulatory Review Structure Federal The St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area. State There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units (LGUs) which can be counties, townships, cities, watershed districts, watershed management organizations or state agencies (on state-owned land). The Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially -designated public waters via the Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project. Required Information Prior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre - application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a venue (such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings) for potential applicants to discuss their projects with multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below. The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations. • For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A. • For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions, WCA no -loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B. • For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D. • For local road authority activities that qualify for the state's local road wetland replacement program, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachments C, D (if applicable), and E to both the Corps and the LGU. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form — Revised May 2021 Page 1 of 12 Submission Instructions Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to: U.S Army Corps of Engineers. Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of responsibilities and contact information, visit the St. Paul District's website at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatorV.aspx and select "Minnesota" from the contact Information box. Alternatively, applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the appropriate field office. Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project. Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS) for submission of Public Waters permit applications (https://webappsll.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login). Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum, will satisfy Parts one and two of this joint application. For certain types of activities, the MPARS application may also provide all of the necessary information required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the project (see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the remainder of the joint application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form — Revised May 2021 Page 2 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Will Effertz, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130 Phone: 952-290-6340 E-mail Address: will@kiolhaugenv.com County: Hennepin PART TWO: Site Location Information City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 07-117-23-21-0002; 07-117-23-21-0016; 07-117-23-21-0007; 07-117-23-21-0006 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): S:07; T:117N; R:21W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 44.96, -93.64 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 13.42 If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Application is for delineation concurrence/approval. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form — Revised May 2021 Page 3 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact' Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Aquatic Resource Resource Type ID (as noted on (wetland, lake, overhead view) tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Overall Size of Size of Impact2 Aquatic Resource a Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Areas "If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the "T". For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered "T (220)". 21mpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter "N/A". 4U se Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre -application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form — Revised May 2021 Page 4 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: 1003 Wildhurst Trail (KES 2022-130) Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): ® Wetland Type Confirmation ® Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form — Revised May 2021 Page 5 of 12 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP1 -1 Up Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 3 to 5 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny soils VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Ulmus americana 65 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Tilia americana 15 N FACU Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.00% (A/B) 80 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 60 Y FAC Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 65 x 2 = 130 4 FAC species 95 x 3 = 285 5 FACU species 25 x 4 = 100 60 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 185 (A) 515 (B) 1 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.78 2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 Y FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 45 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-1Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Clay loam 22-26 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay loam Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 26 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP1 -1 Wet Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Muskego, Blue Earth and Houghton soils (hydric) VWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 60 x 1 = 60 3 FACW species 60 x 2 = 120 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 120 (A) 180 (B) 1 Typha X Glauca 60 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.50 2 Phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW 3 Impatiens capensis 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 120 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Loam 10-25 10YR 2/1 100 True Aquatic Plants (1314) Clay loam 25-32 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay loam Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 32 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1 Up Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 3 to 5 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Hamel, overwash-hamel (partially hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 75 x 4 = 300 0 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 95 (A) 340 (B) 1 Solidago canadensis 50 Y FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.58 2 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW 3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Galium aparine 10 N FACU Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU _ Dominance test is >50% 6 _ Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 _ Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Loam 10-18 10YR 3/1 100 True Aquatic Plants (1314) Clay loam 18-22 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 5/1 10 D M Clay loam 22-30 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/1 10 D M Clay loam Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. —Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 30 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1 Wet Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Klossner muck (hydric) VWI Classification: PEM1A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 80 x 2 = 160 4 FAC species 10 x 3 = 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 90 (A) 190 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.11 2 Solanum dulcamara 10 N FAC 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 90 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-28 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Clay loam 28-30 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay loam Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1 Up Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 3 to 5 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny soils VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer negundo 35 Y FAC that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.00% (A/B) 35 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 45 Y FAC Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 95 x 3 = 285 5 FACU species 55 x 4 = 220 45 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 150 (A) 505 (B) 1 Poa sp. 40 Y FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.37 2 Solidago canadensis 15 Y FACU 3 Amphicarpaea bracteata 15 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 _ Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 70 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Loam 16-28 10YR 2/1 100 True Aquatic Plants (1314) Clay loam 28-32 10YR 4/1 98 10YR 4/1 2 C M Clay loam Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 32 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 1003 Wildhurst Trail City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 08/10/2022 Applicant/Owner: See joint application form State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1 Wet Investigator(s): Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:07, T:117N, R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2 Lat: - Long: - Datum: - Soil Map Unit Name Hamel, overwash-hamel (partially hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climate conditions were atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Populus tremuloides 15 Y FAC Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 80 x 2 = 160 4 FAC species 30 x 3 = 90 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 15 = Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 110 (A) 250 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 65 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.27 2 Urtica dioica 15 N FACW 3 Solanum dulcamara 15 N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is <_3.0` 7 Morphological adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 = Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) _ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3-1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (613) Loam 10-32 10YR 2/1 100 True Aquatic Plants (1314) Clay loam 32-36 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay loam Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 36 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us a Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Saga Hill section number: 7 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 Score using 1991-2020 normal period values are in inches A'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar -based estimates. first prior month: July 2022 second prior month: June 2022 third prior month: May 2022 estimated precipitation total for this location: 2.29 0.80 2.80 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.90 3.45 3.06 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.67 4.84 5.06 type of month: dry normal wet dry dry dry monthly score 3* 1= 3 2* 1 =2 1* 1 =1 multi -month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) 6 (dry) Other Resources: ■ retrieve daily precipitation data ■ view radar -based precipitation estimates ■ view weekly precipitation maps ■ Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 1 0 1/30/22 2/14/22 3/1/22 3/16/22 3/31/22 4/15/22 4/30/22 5/15/22 5/30/22 6/14/22 6/29/22 7/14/22 7/29/22 — daily precip 30d rolling total 1003 Wildhurst Trail: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Site Visit: August 10, 2022 Monthly Totals: 2022 Target: T117N R23w S07, gat: 44.96 Lon: -93.63 Mon Year CC Tttn rrw ss nnnn 00000000 Apr May pre Jul May 2022 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG Dec WARM ANN WA 2.80 0.44 Jun 2022 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 3.25 2.70 2.91 2.20 0.80 1.08 Jul 2022 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 70% 1.17 0.85 2.01 2.29 3.96 May/June/]uly/August 3.98 Daily 4.36 Records 1.97 1.37 21.67 Date Precip. Date Precip. Date 1.68 Precip. Date Precip. May 1, 2022 .03 Jun 1, 2022 0 Jul 1, 2022 0 Aug 1, 2022 0 May 2, 2022 0 Jun 2, 2022 0 Jul 2, 2022 .06 Aug 2, 2022 0 May 3, 2022 0 Jun 3, 2022 0 Jul 3, 2022 0 Aug 3, 2022 .15 May 4, 2022 0 Jun 4, 2022 0 Jul 4, 2022 .29 Aug 4, 2022 0 May 5, 2022 0 Jun 5, 2022 .13 Jul 5, 2022 .03 Aug 5, 2022 0 May 6, 2022 0 Jun 6, 2022 0 Jul 6, 2022 0 Aug 6, 2022 .02 May 7, 2022 0 Jun 7, 2022 0 Jul 7, 2022 1.58 Aug 7, 2022 .72 May 8, 2022 .08 Jun 8, 2022 0 Jul 8, 2022 0 Aug 8, 2022 .92 May 9, 2022 0 Jun 9, 2022 0 Jul 9, 2022 0 Aug 9, 2022 0 May 10, 2022 0 Jun 10, 2022 .06 Jul 10, 2022 .08 Aug 10, 2022 0 May 11, 2022 1.20 Jun 11, 2022 0 Jul 11, 2022 0 Aug 11, 2022 0 May 12, 2022 .15 Jun 12, 2022 .11 Jul 12, 2022 .03 May 13, 2022 0 Jun 13, 2022 0 Jul 13, 2022 0 May 14, 2022 0 Jun 14, 2022 0 Jul 14, 2022 .05 May 15, 2022 0 Jun 15, 2022 0 Jul 15, 2022 0 May 16, 2022 0 Jun 16, 2022 0 Jul 16, 2022 0 May 17, 2022 .14 Jun 17, 2022 0 Jul 17, 2022 0 May 18, 2022 .02 Jun 18, 2022 0 Jul 18, 2022 0 May 195 2022 .05 Jun 195 2022 0 Jul 19, 2022 0 May 20, 2022 0 Jun 20, 2022 .17 Jul 20, 2022 0 May 215 2022 0 Jun 215 2022 0 Jul 21, 2022 0 May 22, 2022 0 Jun 22, 2022 0 Jul 22, 2022 0 May 235 2022 0 Jun 235 2022 0 Jul 23, 2022 .03 May 24, 2022 .27 Jun 24, 2022 .19 Jul 24, 2022 0 May 255 2022 .10 Jun 255 2022 0 Jul 25, 2022 0 May 26, 2022 0 Jun 26, 2022 0 Jul 26, 2022 .14 May 275 2022 .05 Jun 275 2022 .02 Jul 27, 2022 0 May 28, 2022 .02 Jun 28, 2022 0 Jul 28, 2022 0 May 295 2022 .19 Jun 295 2022 .12 Jul 29, 2022 0 May 30, 2022 .50 Jun 30, 2022 0 Jul 30, 2022 0 May 315 2022 0 Jul 31, 2022 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WA 30% 0.44 0.41 1.07 1.97 2.48 3.25 2.70 2.91 2.20 1.18 1.08 0.60 16.58 26.25 26.01 70% 1.17 0.85 2.01 2.82 3.96 5.44 3.98 4.99 4.36 3.19 1.97 1.37 21.67 33.83 32.87 mean 0.82 0.73 1.68 2.55 3.41 4.42 3.89 4.06 3.41 2.38 1.67 1.12 19.19 30.13 29.98 BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Matt Johnson Applicant Representative: Will Effertz — Kjolhaug Environmental Project Name: 1003 Wildhurst Trail LGU Project No. (if any): W22-057 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/21/22 Date of LGU Decision: 11/21/22 Date this Notice was Sent: 11/21/22 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ® Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑ Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E ❑F ❑G ®H Subpart: ❑2❑3❑4❑5 ❑6❑7 ❑8❑9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ❑ Project Specific Credits: ❑ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ❑X Approve ❑ Approve w/Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ❑ Approved with Conditions (specify below)' ❑X Approved' ❑ Denied List Conditions: Decision -Maker for this Application: X❑ Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other: Decision is valid for: ❑X 5 years (default) ❑ Other (specify): ' Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BW5R confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project - specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings —Attach docui ❑ Attachment(s) (specify): ❑ Summary: and/or insert narrative Drovidine the basis for the LGU decision'. Matt Johnson has applied for Boundary & Type approval/confirmation for the wetlands located on/at 1003 Wildhurst Trail. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhaug Environmental on 10/11/22. The delineation shows 3 wetlands within the project area. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 1 MCWD, BWSR, and Kjolhaug Environmental Staff reviewed the boundaries in the field on 11/4/22. MCWD and BWSR were in agreement with the wetland boundaries and types identified on site and shown in the delineation report. BWSR and MCWD requested an updated delineation figure with the following edits: 1. Wetland 2 was determined to not be a wetland and shouldn't be labeled as such. The boundary to the north of that on the parcel line however is a wetland and required updated delineation. 2. Wetland 3 required slightly altered boundaries. An updated figure was provided to the MCWD on 11/8/22. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the updated figure. This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. I Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Proiect Documents ❑ Site Location Map ❑ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ❑ Yes' ❑ No 'If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ❑X SWCD TEP Member: Tony brough- tony.brough@co.hennepin.mn.us ❑x BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chestnut- Jed.Chestnut@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ❑X DNR Representative: Wes.Saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ❑ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Crg.: BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 ❑x Applicant: Matt Johnson - Matt@minnetonkamatt.com ❑x Agent/Consultant: Will Effertz - will@kjolhaugenv.com Optional or As Applicable: ❑ Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ❑ Members of the Public (notice only): ❑ Other: Signature: Date: 11/21/22 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 MBOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Matt Johnson Applicant Representative: Will Effertz — Kjolhaug Environmental Services Project Name: 1003 Wildhurst Trail LGU Project No. (if any): W22-057 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/21/22 Date this Notice was Sent by LGU: 10/21/22 Date that Comments on this Application Must Be Received By LGU': 11/05/22 1 minimum 15 business day comment period for Boundary & Type, Sequencing, Replacement Plan and Bank Plan Applications NCA Decision Type - check all that apply ® Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No -Loss (8420.0415) El Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E ❑F ❑G ❑H Subpart: ❑2❑3❑4❑5 0 60 ❑8❑9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Impact Area Proposed: Application Materials ❑ Attached ❑X Other' (specify): Attached to email. 1 Link to ftp or other accessible file sharing sites is acceptable. Comments on this aDDlication should be sent to: LGU Contact Person: Trey Jonas E -Mail Address: tjonas@minnehahacreek.org Address and Phone Number: (952) 641-4521 Decision -Maker for this Application: ❑X Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other (specify): Notice Distribution (include name) Reauired on all notices: ❑X SWCD TEP Member: Tony Brough- tony.brough@co.hennepin.mn.us ❑x BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chestnut-jed.chestnut@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ❑X DNR Representative: Wes Saunders -Pearce- Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us ❑ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: ❑X Applicant (notice only): Matt Johnson - Matt@minnetonkamatt.com ❑X Agent/Consultant (notice only): Will Effertz - will@kjolhaugenv.com 3ptional or As Applicable: ❑X Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ❑ Members of the Public (notice only): ❑ Other: BWSR NOA Form — November 12, 2019 1 Date: 10/21/22 Signature: This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOA Form — November 12, 2019 KjoLHAuGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 10N%M0W*4W#K Providing Sound, Balanced, Comprehensive Natural Resource Solutions Memorandum Date: April 4, 2023 To: Melanie Curtis, City of Orono CC: Matt Johnson, Applicant From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) Re: Conservation Design Analysis, Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN (KES# 2022-130) The Wildhurst Woods project site is located in Section 7, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. More specifically, the site is located in the southwest part of the city of Orono and corresponds to the address of 1003 Wildhurst Trail (PID 0711723210002) (Figure 1). Existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. The applicant, Matt Johnson, is proposing to split an approximately 10 -acre parcel into two separate —5 -acre lots accessible from Wildhurst Trail via a new outlot (Outlot A) (Attachment A). This memo is submitted to demonstrate compliance with the City of Orono Conservation Design Ordinance, which is intended to preserve and enhance the ecological/aesthetic character of development areas. Per Article XII (Conservation Design) Section 78-1632 (Applicability), a Conservation Design Plan is required for all proposed residential subdivisions or multi -unit residential developments greater than five acres in total area. Ecological and Aesthetic Character Review RURAL OASIS STUDY Conservation Design requires response to the Rural Oasis Study contained in the City of Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. The project site is not adjacent to an analyzed corridor in the City of Orono's 2005 Rural Oasis Study (Figure 3). The site is only visible and accessible via Wildhurst Trail (road functional class as Other Arterial) and will therefore not have a negative effect on maintaining the rural character of the City of Orono. Review of site conditions, photographs available on Google Street View, and project plans indicate that the proposed project (2 lot split) will not appreciably change the viewshed, visibility of landmarks (none present), or aesthetic character of the project area or neighboring areas. 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130, Minnesota 55331, Phone: 952-401-8757 Wildhurst Woods, Orono NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Conservation Design Analysis MLCCS Land Cover Classification The City of Orono 2040 Community Management Plan Comprehensive Plan - Minnesota Land Cover Classification map (Attachment B) shows the site mapped with: (1) forests, (2) tall grasses, and (3) shrubland. More specifically, the site is mapped with maple -basswood forest, grassland with sparse deciduous trees - altered/non-native dominated vegetation, and altered/non-native dominated upland shrubland (Figure 4). Field observations were generally consistent with the identified MLCCS cover types. Tree Survey A tree survey was completed as part of the planning process for the Wildhurst Woods project. Identified significant tree species (DBH >6") included sugar maple, green ash, red oak, ironwood, basswood, black cherry, red pine, red elm, and bittemut hickory (Attachment Q. The tree survey report noted that many green ash individuals throughout the project area show signs of infection with Emerald Ash Borer. Common buckthorn shrubs (<6" DBH) were also noted to be present in portions of the understory. Wetland Inventory and Delineation A wetland delineation completed for the site in August 2022 by Kjolhaug Environmental Services was subsequently approved by the WCA LGU (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District) in November 2022 (Attachment D) as shown on Figure 2 and summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on Wildhurst Woods site. Topographic Survey Preliminary plat documents (Attachment A) and Figure 2 include 2 -foot lidar topographic contours. Topography on the site is highest in the southwest corner at 1024 feet MSL, and from there slopes downhill to the northeast. A diagonal topographic saddle in the center of the site at 950 feet MSL allows runoff to drain to the northwest (to Wetland 2 located below 938 feet MSL) and to the southeast (over Widlhurst Trail and to Forest Lake). Northeast of the saddle, topography rises again to a high of 964 feet MSL. The site does not include any bluffs as defined in the City of Orono Shoreland Management Ordinance. Conceptual Greenways and Open Space Corridors The Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment map (Attachment E) shows the site within a "conceptual greenway corridor" which includes "medium quality natural communities" which partly correspond to the MLCCS mapped maple -basswood forest. 0► Wetland Type Circular Cowardin Eggers and Reed Wetland ID Dominant Vegetation 39 2 (0.09 -ac Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Reed canary grass, common onsite) buckthorn 3 (0.03 -ac onsite) Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Reed canary grass Topographic Survey Preliminary plat documents (Attachment A) and Figure 2 include 2 -foot lidar topographic contours. Topography on the site is highest in the southwest corner at 1024 feet MSL, and from there slopes downhill to the northeast. A diagonal topographic saddle in the center of the site at 950 feet MSL allows runoff to drain to the northwest (to Wetland 2 located below 938 feet MSL) and to the southeast (over Widlhurst Trail and to Forest Lake). Northeast of the saddle, topography rises again to a high of 964 feet MSL. The site does not include any bluffs as defined in the City of Orono Shoreland Management Ordinance. Conceptual Greenways and Open Space Corridors The Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment map (Attachment E) shows the site within a "conceptual greenway corridor" which includes "medium quality natural communities" which partly correspond to the MLCCS mapped maple -basswood forest. 0► Wildhurst Woods, Orono Rare Plant Communities Conservation Design Analysis The Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species map (Attachment F) indicates the potential for rare species within the southwest MLCCS mapped maple -basswood forest community. However, no rare plant communities or species were observed during wetland delineation or tree survey field work. Conservation Design Master Plan 1. Consideration of existing drainage — Existing drainage includes overland flow towards Wetland 2, and over Wildhurst Trail eventually to Forest Lake. The site does not contain any surface drainage inlets or storm sewers. Due to the scope of the project (2 lot split, each 5 acres in size), the Wildhurst Woods project is unlikely to significantly affect existing drainage patters to nearby waters/wetlands. 2. Establishment of stormwater management system — Stormwater will be managed in the future in compliance with local, state, and federal regulations. A stormwater management plan will be developed as part of future permitting for home construction within individual lots. 3. Invasive species removal and management plans — Reed canary grass was observed in wetland areas, and common buckthorn was observed in the shrub layer of various portions of the upland woodland and wetland fringe. Both reed canary grass and common buckthorn removal require perpetual management (physical removal and chemical herbicide applications) due to the underlying seedbank and continual reintroduction of non-native seeds by animals, etc. Removal and management of these species is not recommended due to the high potential for non-native/invasive recovery/rebound once management activities cease. No onsite areas/habitats were identified for proactive management or special protection at this time. 4. Protection of significant tree stands and removal of diseased trees — The entire project area is wooded. Some tree removal will be required to construct future homes and driveways; however, tree removal is not part of the currently proposed project. Specific trees that will be removed with future custom -graded home lots is not known at this time and will be at the discretion of future landowners. It is likely that green ash trees infected with Emerald Ash Borer will eventually be removed due to their hazard potential. Preventive treatment of uninfected green ash trees is also perpetual and will therefore be at the discretion of the future landowners. 5. Protect wetlands and augment buffers — The proposed plan will not impact wetlands. Wetland buffers will be established as part of future permitting for home construction within individual lots. 6. Justification and mitigation of any negative impact to ecological communities — Due to the scope of the project (2 lot split, each 5 acres in size), negative impact to ecological communities is not expected. 7. Maintenance of ecological connections - Due to scope of the project (2 lot split, each 5 acres in size), existing natural communities and greenway corridor characteristics will be maintained. 8. Maintenance and protection of existing positive views and mitigation of negative views — The 2 new lots will have limited visibility from Wildhurst Trail due to: (1) wooded site conditions, and (2) the 90 -degree angle of Wildhurst Trail where it intersects Wildhurst Woods, Orono Conservation Design Analysis with the project area. There is limited visibility of the project area from Forest Lake, which is more than 600 feet to the southeast and whose view is obscured by a >2.5 -ac wetland fringed by trees. 9. Preservation or reinterpretation of existing landmarks — there are no landmarks on or near the project area. DENSITY AND PERFORMANCE BONUS The project is not requesting any density of performance bonuses. LONG-TERM PRESERVATION AND BUYER EDUCATION With future home construction permitting, wetlands and associated buffers will be protected by conservation easements recorded on the property deeds. Conservation language will describe prohibited and allowable activities within these areas. Buffer limits will be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers at the buffer's upland edge. Sharing of Emerald Ash Borer educational materials with future homeowners may help to prevent injury/home damage, and/or mitigate or slow the spread of this disease within the city. SUMMARY The proposed Wildhurst Woods project meets City of Orono Conservation Design standards and results in preservation and protection of Orono's ecological and aesthetic character. With this analysis, no negative effects were identified for the following Conservation Ordinance Requirements: • Protection of and enhancement of drainageways and water quality. • Protection and enhancement of ecological communities. • Reinforcement and establishment of ecological connection throughout the site. • Augmentation and preservation of viewsheds including corridor enclosure and buffering. • Preservation of views. • Preservation of reinterpretation of local landmarks. 4 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Figures Figure 1. Site Location Figure 2. Existing Conditions Figure 3. Rural Oasis Study Analysis Corridors Figure 4. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System a ` Lake o Say. �..�`. Legend _ h Project Boundary op CITY Boundary ® TOWNSHIP ® Mound UNORGANIZED TERRITORY 2021 hennepin parcels ©0penStreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,500 Wildhurst Woods (KES 2022-130) Feet Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated Kr u r T/� ry on this figure are approximate J�I/� I'RHuG F.NVJRONME.NTA1. SF. RVICE.S COlMPAI\"Y and do not constitute an �wR official survey product. -ter Source: ESRI Streets Basemap )kL 956 4 x 70 70 �po 10 70 1030 co 70 1034 70"6' 1036 Ll 10 LLJ C14 co 0 Ory 'K'V O 0 O Aj':`4 19 WLIII 9,30 O O 2K 16 4y •- ti •� X 4h ti A: ja p s ' 1 �� • . _ e � Project Location _ _ lir ■ � � � • •' Y J� kViJ i L Lr ti�-.. IMr•: r L ` . . :.:Ae, ORONO Ru--arl Qasis Figure 3 - Rural Oasis Study Analysis Corridors N 0 1,500 Wildhurst Woods (KES 2022-130) Feet � Project Boundary Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated K/� r u r T/� ry on this figure are approximate joLHAuG F.NVJRONMENT1[. SF. RVI CES COMPAI\"Y and do not constitute an �wR official survey product. ►rY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Figure 4 - Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) 1 A 250 Feet KjoL HuG F.NVJRONMENT1[. SF. RVI CES COMPAIN"Y Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Wildhurst Woods (KES 2022-130) Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment A — Preliminary Plat e t t v A i l II VII PROPERTY DESCRIPTION eat ,1,Htha Nahha.at mane.wu,°Nmehaat a�aaa.w .bea .xanw aa. ne�emmty.I.e� xxexxr.hatea.t .`hm`t 6.`ws�.,aa;ata.wao aoirrt: NOTES t) e m Md.eer 1003 WJdhma n., o.vvx MN III rzl nmd /.vna Infmmvnan: TTiHa pdmparty apwe�s wliv in avvv x (vrcv d°wyminra tuba wtvidv Mthv o.ayfi avvual ahav oa � p svJ prs Flmd Lawamexat Map, Gmmuvity Pan°I Baa m..:x°,re mH� t,c°o�em axxszww b.ea wmuaMm„aaa• apa ®B�Nat��a�Haaamea,. �e1d°ba�.a�o,and�Axde.� b)�dagfM�t;°a: umaaa s pa""""emeanyunntn tour Famx.Heaant;°I enamel emthe ea,vaeal at.vcLureaeenaet v�et4) feet (xa xnva) aHe: feet H'nteamb— Fh¢h Waezr L' Fla.av�ae..a eaKmv�Nlvtaea mwl.�am eaawan eg a amp ..f°. ,m, na�s�i��ne�..a. taa n1 eveaztlw+nte. J_7 OvevC�Jla auq�are one may mb 1— Ai% m-bE vbw.e aethe.61i-Noma vvthe ® ro°oma ��tace orve c°n WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION PROPOSED EASEMENT INFORMATION o— —1 o STREET NAME PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION 45 NORTH r� oocv�ao anI in>re,slra.e N ►vcylu�r•�I���� PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILDHURST WOODS PREPARED FOR: MATT JOHNSON evy:ry'tm a uava w.2t duyvt MarzhM'm'acaa�ty. Dema �� SUeMITAUREV1510N Origwal Survey: 312112023 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- SHEET I OF 1 LEGEND 0 c O s 0 ait wrvo s • s � 5 0 cexcrestc —— d w w o F f e E s ®o ¢ Po ®s Nn s — 7 — .nory ° as°ury •e® � t �m °m�,y veoesul — 0 mre3s,oe PROPERTY DESCRIPTION eat ,1,Htha Nahha.at mane.wu,°Nmehaat a�aaa.w .bea .xanw aa. ne�emmty.I.e� xxexxr.hatea.t .`hm`t 6.`ws�.,aa;ata.wao aoirrt: NOTES t) e m Md.eer 1003 WJdhma n., o.vvx MN III rzl nmd /.vna Infmmvnan: TTiHa pdmparty apwe�s wliv in avvv x (vrcv d°wyminra tuba wtvidv Mthv o.ayfi avvual ahav oa � p svJ prs Flmd Lawamexat Map, Gmmuvity Pan°I Baa m..:x°,re mH� t,c°o�em axxszww b.ea wmuaMm„aaa• apa ®B�Nat��a�Haaamea,. �e1d°ba�.a�o,and�Axde.� b)�dagfM�t;°a: umaaa s pa""""emeanyunntn tour Famx.Heaant;°I enamel emthe ea,vaeal at.vcLureaeenaet v�et4) feet (xa xnva) aHe: feet H'nteamb— Fh¢h Waezr L' Fla.av�ae..a eaKmv�Nlvtaea mwl.�am eaawan eg a amp ..f°. ,m, na�s�i��ne�..a. taa n1 eveaztlw+nte. J_7 OvevC�Jla auq�are one may mb 1— Ai% m-bE vbw.e aethe.61i-Noma vvthe ® ro°oma ��tace orve c°n WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION PROPOSED EASEMENT INFORMATION o— —1 o STREET NAME PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION 45 NORTH r� oocv�ao anI in>re,slra.e N ►vcylu�r•�I���� PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILDHURST WOODS PREPARED FOR: MATT JOHNSON evy:ry'tm a uava w.2t duyvt MarzhM'm'acaa�ty. Dema �� SUeMITAUREV1510N Origwal Survey: 312112023 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- SHEET I OF 1 F _ — --i iF PROPERTY DESCRIPTION eat ,1,Htha Nahha.at mane.wu,°Nmehaat a�aaa.w .bea .xanw aa. ne�emmty.I.e� xxexxr.hatea.t .`hm`t 6.`ws�.,aa;ata.wao aoirrt: NOTES t) e m Md.eer 1003 WJdhma n., o.vvx MN III rzl nmd /.vna Infmmvnan: TTiHa pdmparty apwe�s wliv in avvv x (vrcv d°wyminra tuba wtvidv Mthv o.ayfi avvual ahav oa � p svJ prs Flmd Lawamexat Map, Gmmuvity Pan°I Baa m..:x°,re mH� t,c°o�em axxszww b.ea wmuaMm„aaa• apa ®B�Nat��a�Haaamea,. �e1d°ba�.a�o,and�Axde.� b)�dagfM�t;°a: umaaa s pa""""emeanyunntn tour Famx.Heaant;°I enamel emthe ea,vaeal at.vcLureaeenaet v�et4) feet (xa xnva) aHe: feet H'nteamb— Fh¢h Waezr L' Fla.av�ae..a eaKmv�Nlvtaea mwl.�am eaawan eg a amp ..f°. ,m, na�s�i��ne�..a. taa n1 eveaztlw+nte. J_7 OvevC�Jla auq�are one may mb 1— Ai% m-bE vbw.e aethe.61i-Noma vvthe ® ro°oma ��tace orve c°n WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION PROPOSED EASEMENT INFORMATION o— —1 o STREET NAME PROPOSED LOT INFORMATION 45 NORTH r� oocv�ao anI in>re,slra.e N ►vcylu�r•�I���� PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILDHURST WOODS PREPARED FOR: MATT JOHNSON evy:ry'tm a uava w.2t duyvt MarzhM'm'acaa�ty. Dema �� SUeMITAUREV1510N Origwal Survey: 312112023 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- SHEET I OF 1 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment B — MLCCS Map �t0", 2040 Cc „� Orono, MN r Plan Minnesota Land Cover Classification November 2018 12 s / k..�,-.�.._..�.�s _-. ��.._.._,,,,.�-..�..=-•�z ���w�/ .�..�..�..�. f.:3.. f—. .�..� a Tfo\ ti w. .w.www wo E .1 i a 1 3 �wwwwwww .� 6th d 9� <4 0 0 _•,, moa eN 1 N ♦ 3 w f: prin9.2` bPoe O a o wl •z TlKe'Iley Lake r ♦ w 12 Daniels St - ♦1 1 '-c Moline Road a g° dP m a 1 Grand AdDr ardq �•� �1 rD'0, h1 1 �LL own R 3 C 1 ' ,...,d -• w.w+w �. a�9 Lalz t o w l 19 N r oad in 1 1 / ti 1 RO ; WaYza R!, to Blvd d I oda 1�1 wwN GYA� m Iw�wl J. 12 � a 1 ♦ �, 1 ®BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave MLCCS 11. 5-10% .31. Forest Impervious poa d Impervious Forest '{ F.S.trw m r w0 ■ w. .� i. I ,♦ 1 Y\ Painter I I 1� �4 ! w �-w w w a1� ` w w w -ol W Branch Road County Road 151 _ _ 15. % Grasses �1 Impervious 1 62. Wetland 21. Short Emergent Vag. a Nortf 0 . ♦ ♦ ” Browns 1 22. Agricultural Grasses Psr ,o`'. Arm 90. Open ♦ �� . 1♦ _-.... �r Bay 1p Tall Grass 1 92. Wetland I French Sunnyfield Road E ` Forest 3rsh 1 a j Lake '� NSho a Or o Jenn, _ a BaY m me Farm $ Road �• w � Smith Bracket i Bay Point i e r"1 1 Nest �♦ w�. �... ��, 1 Dutch 4rm ,,..,., '♦ Lake > 1 ♦ �•wR w�'ww•. 1 m ` Harrison Bay 1 I ' � I� • 1 1 Lynwood Blvd E 0 �+•��•��•_� O� c7 shoreline O� <yric Lafayette A- itr --- --- Bay I �f 1 Legend e , L Y "'yam - ♦.i �, 9�e • City Limits Lakes & Ponds f SP, Part �I, q•!♦� Carman''s �,♦'f �i 2040 MUSA -�-�- Rivers & Streams 1 Ba y Bay 1=��1 ♦'� ��.��.��.��.� 0 3,500 .ear ♦ �w 11111111i Feetnih Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County MnDOT Casco 41 �,���-� =mint r1 {,\ ®BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave MLCCS 11. 5-10% .31. Forest Impervious 12. 11-25% 32. Wetland Impervious Forest 26-50% 51. Shrubland _13. Impervious 52. Wetland _14. 51-75% Shrubs Impervious 61. Tall _ _ 15. % Grasses Impervious 62. Wetland 21. Short Emergent Vag. a Grasses / 63. DryTall 22. Agricultural Grasses Psr Land 90. Open r 23. Maintained Water Tall Grass 92. Wetland _Tree Open Water Plantation Map 3A-4 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment C — Tree Survey Tree Survey for 1003 Wildhurst Trail March 22, 2023 On March 22, 2023 a tree survey was conducted at 1003 Wildhurst Trail in Orono, Minnesota for property owner Matt Johnson. This survey concerns the ten -acre parcel of land west of the single-family residence. A previous land survey described the property boundaries and also subdivided the ten acres into two approximately equal sized lots — lot 1 to the north and lot 2 to the south. Aerial imagery from 1963 shows only forested area in the southwest corner and along the southern border of what is now lot 2. Lot 1 is almost entirely absent of trees on that same photograph. The purpose of this tree survey was to take inventory of the species present and to evaluate the relative abundance across all species. All trees measured had to be over 6" in diameter at breast height to be recorded as data. The survey method used was line -transect sampling. Transect lines ran east to west across lots 1 and 2. Both lots had three transect lines, each spanning the 200m width of the lots. Every line was directed using a mirror -sighted compass, and every tree that fell within arm's reach from walking the line was recorded. Lot 1's most canopy -dominant and most relatively abundance species was Fraxinus pennsylvanica at a relative abundance of 45.5%. Many of the F. pennsylvanica individuals throughout lots 1 and 2 showed signs of EAB invasion. In the wetland -delineated area of lot 1, there was much new growth of Rhamnus cathartica which raises management concerns. There was also regeneration of Betula nigra in the wetland area as well as Acer saccharum regeneration on the upland slope of lot 1. Lot 1 appears to have completely forested over since 1963. Lot 2 was dominated by very old Acer saccharum individuals for a relative abundance of 58%. There was a mixture of dead and healthy individuals. Among the large Acer saccharum individuals was Tilia americana which was the second most dominant species in lot 2 with many large trees an a relative abundance of 16%. There appeared to be much upland regeneration of Acer saccharum and Prunus serotina saplings where the large dead trees left a canopy gap. Lot 2 appears to have little presence of Rhamnus cathartica. Potentially some of the large dead trees could be removed to create more growing space for the next generation. i I_irr — J or, J 91F 11 - i .-;i I�- yam J. - - -'-:J L 761 j�j� E::_ .. i _ M1� I ' DUT ■ k r+ +�' I I i �.. x I .- - -I Lam_------- - ---- J r1CGHVIL ky LA. .:7 ,mr" Black - Acer saccharum . _ Green - Fraxinus 4RGOYRFE� k� n.,e-Lir wfa.�ktr ��K+•-�, �� J.rt.c.�Y�a+�r�...�aa. �x• w +"T� —may r•�i1..i�{ � � nrl.. �.�. lifer•- �—wt •-• Mei.. �.��..—�.....����.�... 1447! tYL[LI%LATIa� I%45.rk 1lfarY,ak rwrll,�µrvr}%r,rrrr r�rn^iTlux LU ate' I I _j L_ 4 r^� y�x 1 5 45 NORTH FIiEiJhS1DPARY PLAT [IF WILT)HUR€T WOODS rurrn1101 N.J. 14 MET JOHNSON SH EL] I Or I 6 - 15" dbh pennsylvanica ra{Iv�o4iRa%rs,ela�sao- Red - Quercus rubra -u 15 -.25" dbh Blue ' O$iyid Vhfghnlana �JKaf1�e - viiia americana 5 - 35" dbh Yellow - Prunus serotina Pink - Pinus resinasa =; Blue X - G"lus cordi#ormis R Red X - Ulmus rubra 4 r^� y�x 1 5 45 NORTH FIiEiJhS1DPARY PLAT [IF WILT)HUR€T WOODS rurrn1101 N.J. 14 MET JOHNSON SH EL] I Or I Line # 1 Betula nigra 1 Acer saccharum 1 Fraxinus pennsyl 2 Acer saccharum 3 Fraxinus pennsyl 7 4 1 7 2 Lot 1 Circumference (inches) Species DBH (inches) Relative Abundance Mean DBH by Species 1 94 Acer saccharum 29.9211293 0.2727272727 17.03189503 2 40 Acer saccharum 12.73239545 2 19 Aoer saccharum 6.047887837 2 29.5 Acer saccharum 9.390141642 2 41 Acer saccharum 13.05070533 3 61 Acer saccharum 19.41690306 3 126 Acer saccharum 40.1070456E 3 20 Aoer saccharum 6.366197724 3 50.5 Acer saccharum 16.07464925 1 19.5 Fraxinus pennsylvania 6.207042781 0.4545454545 12.18065831 1 25 Fraxinus pennsylvania 7.957747155 1 20 Fraxinus pennsylvania 6.366197724 1 38 Fraxinus pennsylvania 12.09577567 2 38 Fraxinus pennsylvania 12.09577567 2 20 Fraxinus pennsylvania 6.366197724 2 28 Fraxinus pennsylvania 8.912676813 2 42.5 Fraxinus pennsylvania 13.52817016 2 123 Fraxinus pennsylvania 39.152116 2 46 Fraxinus pennsylvania 14.6422547E 2 24.5 Fraxinus pennsylvania 7.798592212 3 48 Fraxinus pennsylvania 15.27887454 3 27 Fraxinus pennsylvania 8.594366927 3 38 Fraxinus pennsylvania 12.09577567 3 36.5 Fraxinus pennsylvania 11.61831085 2 22 ostyra virginiana 7.002817496 0.09090909091 7.215024087 3 27 ostyra virginiana 8.594366927 3 19 Qstyra virginiana 6.047887837 1 39.5 Quercus rubra 12.5732405 0.1515151515 20.08535382 1 39 Quercus rubra 12.41408556 3 43 Quercus rubra 13.68732511 3 96 Quercus rubra 30.55774907 3 98 Quercus rubra 31.39436885 1 24 Ulmus rubra 7.639437268 0.03033030303 7.639437268 1 Betula nigra 1 Acer saccharum 1 Fraxinus pennsyl 2 Acer saccharum 3 Fraxinus pennsyl 7 4 1 7 2 Lot 2 Line # Circumference (inches) Species DBH (inches) Relative Abundance Mean OBH by Species 1 22.25 Acer saccharum 7.082394968 0.58 12.12135023 1 22.33 Acer saccharum 7.107859758 1 1 20.25 Acer saccharum 6.445775195 3 1 35.75 Acer saccharum 11.37957843 1 24 Acer saccharum 7.639437268 1 35 Acer saocharum 11.14084602 1 21 Acer saccharum 8.68450761 1 31 Acer saccharum 9.867606472 1 26 Acer saccharum 8.276057041 1 37 Acer saccharum 11.77746579 1 26.25 Acer saccharum 8.355634512 1 37.5 Acer saccharum 11.93662073 1 42 Acer saccharum 13.36901522 1 33.5 Acer saccharum 10.66338119 1 56.25 Acer saocharum 17.9449311 1 71.75 Acer saccharum 22.$3873433 1 45 Acer saccharum 14.32394488 2 72 Acer saccharum 22.91831181 2 31.5 Acer saccharum 10.02676141 2 44.5 Acer saccharum 14.16478994 2 19.5 Acer saccharum 6.207042781 2 21 Acer saccharum 6.68450761 3 24 Acer saccharum 7.639437268 3 40 Acer saccharum 12.73239545 3 20.5 Acer saccharum 6.525352667 3 34 Acer saccharum 10.82253613 3 60 Acer saocharum 19.09859317 3 84 Acer saccharum 26.73803044 3 66.5 Acer saccharum 21.16760743 3 37.5 Corylus cordiformis 11.93662073 0.04 12.49366303 3 41 Corylus cordiformis 13.05070533 1 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 19.73521294 0.1 13.06662083 1 45.75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 14.56267729 2 26 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.276057041 3 42.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 13.52817016 3 29 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.230986699 2 39 Pinus resinosa 12.41408556 0.06 11.19389766 2 29 Pinus resinosa 9.230986699 2 37.5 Pinus resinosa 11.93662073 1 36.25 Prunus serotina 11.53873337 0.04 9.03204302 2 20.5 Prunus serotina 6.525352667 Line # Species Under >6" Count 1 Acer saccharum 16 2 Acer saccharum 12 2 Fraxinus pennnsylvanica 1 2 Betula nigra 3 3 Tilia americana 1 3 Acer saccharum 7 3 Betula nigra 3 Lot 2 2 39.5 Quercus rubra 12.5732405 0.02 12.5732405 1 38 Tilia americana 12.09577567 0.16 12.65281798 1 47 Tilia americana 14.96056465 2 67 Tilia americana 21.32676237 2 41 Tilia americana 13.05070533 3 32 cilia americana 10.18591636 3 20 Tilia americana 6.366197724 3 33 Tilia americana 10.50422624 3 40 Tilia americana 12.73239545 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment D — Delineation Notice of Decision MIBOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Matt Johnson Applicant Representative: Will Effertz — Kjolhaug Environmental Project Name: 1003 Wildhurst Trail LGU Project No. (if any): W22-057 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/21/22 Date of LGU Decision: 11/21/22 Date this Notice was Sent: 11/21/22 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ® Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑ Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E ❑F ❑G ®H Subpart: ❑2❑3❑4❑5 ❑607 ❑809 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ❑ Project Specific Credits: ❑ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ❑X Approve ❑ Approve w/Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ❑ Approved with Conditions (specify below)' ❑X Approved' ❑ Denied List Conditions: Decision -Maker for this Application: X❑ Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other: Decision is valid for: ❑X 5 years (default) ❑ Other (specify): ' Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BW5R confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project - specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings —Attach docui ❑ Attachment(s) (specify): ❑ Summary: and/or insert narrative Drovidine the basis for the LGU decision'. Matt Johnson has applied for Boundary & Type approval/confirmation for the wetlands located on/at 1003 Wildhurst Trail. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhaug Environmental on 10/11/22. The delineation shows 3 wetlands within the project area. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 1 MCWD, BWSR, and Kjolhaug Environmental Staff reviewed the boundaries in the field on 11/4/22. MCWD and BWSR were in agreement with the wetland boundaries and types identified on site and shown in the delineation report. BWSR and MCWD requested an updated delineation figure with the following edits: 1. Wetland 2 was determined to not be a wetland and shouldn't be labeled as such. The boundary to the north of that on the parcel line however is a wetland and required updated delineation. 2. Wetland 3 required slightly altered boundaries. An updated figure was provided to the MCWD on 11/8/22. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the updated figure. This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. I Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Proiect Documents ❑ Site Location Map ❑ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ❑ Yes' ❑ No 'If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ❑X SWCD TEP Member: Tony brough- tony.brough@co.hennepin.mn.us ❑x BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chestnut- Jed.Chestnut@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ❑X DNR Representative: Wes.Saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ❑ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Crg.: BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 ❑x Applicant: Matt Johnson - Matt@minnetonkamatt.com ❑x Agent/Consultant: Will Effertz - will@kjolhaugenv.com Optional or As Applicable: ❑ Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ❑ Members of the Public (notice only): ❑ Other: Signature: Date: 11/21/22 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 3 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment E - Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment Map E= City Boundary DNR Scientific and Natural Areas Regional Parks Conceptual Greenway Corridor Adjacent Greenway Corridors Streams Q Existing Wetlands 104 Year Floodplain Legend Cl Steep Slope Soils !Natural Community Quality 0 High Quality Medium Quality Other Natural and Semi -Natural Communities Hennepin County 1 Department of frwironmene2d Services cone .Zion oiw:i— 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 Feet 1 inch equals 4,504 feet Map 3A-5 Wildhurst Woods, Orono, MN Conservation Design Analysis Attachment F - Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species Map Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory [Mcry B—d ry Habum[ Communities with Pmendal For Rare Species Alder—" Birch bog, so.- shrubland - saturaied soils Black ash swam Black ash swamp - seasonally flaoded C a:tai marsh - seasorally F aded C— marsh-sem4pennanstdy flooded Legend Floocplatn forest Lav land hard—d eomst V.IAe asswood forest kl xe energ�t n --h �U—dc-ner&ect —A- seasonal.yflamec M -d hard—d swamp V—d'rardnaod —P - seasdrerly llccdrJ Oak Fares Oak finem mesio subtype 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 Feet inch equals 4,500 feet Oak—.dlaud-bnvsH d Pcorfed sedge subtype door Fen shub subtype Rich ten Rch fen seuge subtype Rich fen shr�b subtype Shrub swamp seepages bYype Taanarack cramp Tamarack swamp minervboph—subtype Waver I. y open marsh Wel meadam We: meadmr-seasonally Eoosed We:meadow eenrpenna!ertry 800dec -WY t meadw shrub subtype "lnw swarm City of Orono - Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 26 March 2006 Figure 10 Conservation Planning ---Hennepin County, Minnesota Conservation Planning This report provides those soil attributes for the conservation plan for the map units in the selected area. The report includes the map unit symbol, the component name, and the percent of the component in the map unit. It provides the soil description along with the slope, runoff, T Factor, WEI, WEG, Erosion class, Drainage class, Land Capability Classification, and the engineering Hydrologic Group and the erosion factors Kf, the representative percentage of fragments, sand, silt, and clay in the mineral surface horizon. Missing surface data may indicate the presence of an organic surface layer. Further information on these factors can be found in the National Soil Survey Handbook section 618 found at the url http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ref/? cid=nres142p2_054223#00 . usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/17/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Conservation Planning ---Hennepin County, Minnesota Report—Conservation Planning Soil properties and interpretations for conservation planning. The surface mineral horizon properties are displayed. Organic surface horizons are not displayed. Conservation Planning–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map symbol and soil Pct. Slope USLE Runoff T WEI WEG Erosion Drainage NIRR Hydro Surface name of RV Slope Fact LCC logic Depths Kf Frag- Sand Silt Clay map Length or Group unit ft. in. Fact ments RV RV RV or RV L16A—Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes Muskego, ponded 35 0.5 124 — 1 0 8 — Very poorly 8w C/D 0 - 9 — — 5 90 5 drained Blue Earth, ponded 30 0.5 124 — 5 0 8 Very poorly 8w B/D 0-50 .37 — 9 65 25 drained Houghton, ponded 25 0.5 124 — 2 0 8 — Very poorly 8w A/D 0-79 — — 5 90 5 drained L36A—Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Hamel, overwash 50 2.0 82 — 5 48 6 None- Somewhat 2w C/D 0-11 .24 4 4037 23 deposition poorly 137 drained Hamel 43 1.0 82 — 5 48 Me one- Poorly drained 2w C/D 0 - 9 .24 4 40 23 "6 deposition ft L40B—Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus 45 4.0 124 —5 48 6 — Well drained 2e B 0 - 7 .24 5 39 37 23 Kilkenny 40 3.0 124 — Moderately 2e C/D 0-11 .28 2 34 37 28 well drained USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/17/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Conservation Planning ---Hennepin County, Minnesota Conservation Planning–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map symbol and soil Pct. Slope USLE Runoff T WEI WEG Erosion Drainage NIRR Hydro Surface name of RV Slope Fact LCC logic Depths Kf Frag- Sand Silt Clay map Length or Group unit ft. in. Fact ments RV RV RV or RV L41 C2—Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester, moderately 50 8.0 98 — 5 48 6 Class 2 Well drained 3e C 0 - 5 .32 5 39 37 24 eroded Kilkenny, moderately 35 8.0 98 48 6 Moderately 3e D 0 - 7 .32 — 33 37 30 eroded well drained L41 D2—Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester, moderately 50 14.0 98 — 5 48 6 Class 2 Well drained 4e C 0 - 5 .32 5 39 37 24 eroded Kilkenny, moderately 35 14.0 98 —1L 5 48 6 Irlass 2 Well drained 4e C 0 - 7 33 37 30 eroded L49A—Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes Klossner, surface 65 0.5 124 — 1 134 2 — Very poorly 6w B/D 0-25 — — 5 90 5 drained drained Klossner, drained 20 0.5 124 — 134 2 Very poorly 3w B/D 0-25 — — 5 90 5 drained L50A—Muskego and Houghton soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes Muskego, surface 45 0.0 688 — 1 134 2 None - Very poorly 6w C/D 0 - 9 — — — — — drained deposition drained Houghton, ponded 40 0.0 688 — 2 None - Very poorly 8w A/D 0 - 8 deposition drained USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/17/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Conservation Planning ---Hennepin County, Minnesota Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 6, 2022 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/17/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 a 449400 440 5744"N ori v ro a 440 57'36'N 449400 449440 449480 449520 449560 449600 3 0 Map Scale: 1:1,830 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters N 0 25 50 100 150 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 UUP Natural Resources Web Soil Survey limm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota (1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN ) 449440 449480 449520 4495W 449600 449640 449680 449720 N 449760 0 440 57' 44" N rn a 449640 449680 449720 rn v 0 ro rn a ro v 440 57' 36" N 449760 3 o rn 3/19/2023 Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) 0 Area of Interest (AOI) Solis 0 Soil Survey Areas 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features va Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp r� Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Rock Outcrop measurements. Saline Spot f Sandy Spot 4g, Severely Eroded Spot Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Sinkhole Web Soil Survey URL: Slide or Slip Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota (1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN ) MAP INFORMATION USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Sodic Spot The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Spoil Area Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Very Stony Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Wet Spot line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Other contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. r� Special Line Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Water Features measurements. x Streams and Canals Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: f44 Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator rrr US Routes projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. Local Roads This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as Background of the version date(s) listed below. Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 6, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 30, 2020—Jul 3, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend 1003 Wildhurst Trail, Orono MN USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel 1.4 10.4% complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Angus -Kilkenny complex, 2 to 1.2 9.2% L40B 6 percent slopes L41 C2 Lester -Kilkenny complex, 6 to 2.3 16.9% 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded L41 D2 Lester -Kilkenny complex, 10 to 7.1 53.0% 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 1.2 9.2% to 1 percent slopes L50A Muskego and Houghton soils, 0.2 1.3% 0 to 1 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 13.3 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. May 4, 2023 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application Wildhurst Trail Engineering Review #1 Dear Melanie: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above - referenced project. I offer the following comments for your consideration: 1. Connection of the driveway serving the two new lots will need to be reviewed in relation to the existing driveway for 1003 Wildhurst Trail. 2. Connection to the municipal sanitary sewer system is available from Wildhurst Trail. These lots should be required to connect to this system, in lieu of using on-site septic systems. A manhole installed for 1003 Wildhurst Trail may facilitate a short distance to connect to the system. 3. Wildhurst Trail was improved in 2018. Connection of the new driveway will need to be coordinated with the current drainage layout. 4. Drainage and Utility Easements must be provided as follows: a. Over all sanitary main serving multiple lots. b. Over all wetlands, creeks, and buffers. c. Over all pipes, swales, and ditches providing a drainage path for multiple properties. d. 5' along all side lot lines, unless adjacent to Development boundary. e. 10' along all front lot lines, rear lot lines, and adjacent to Development boundary. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. j�zc-�4g "4 Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, Director of Public Works / City Engineer H:\0RN0\_Surface Water Management\MS4 Administration\MCM-5\2_Site Plan Reviews\2023\Wildhurst Trail\WildhurstTrail_PP Review_2023-05-04.docx Bolton & Menk is an From: Transportation.Plats To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Transportation. Plats Subject: RE: [External] Preliminary Plat Review PID 07-117-23-21-0002 / Application #LA23-000011 for "1015' Wildhurst Trail Date: Friday, April 28, 2023 11:26:12 AM Melanie, Thank you for sharing. No comments from Hennepin County. Ashley (Hartle) Morello Transportation Planning Office: 612-596-0359 ashley.morello(o�hennepin.us I hennepin.us From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 1:03 PM To: Transportation. Plats <Transportation.Plats@hennepin.us>; 'Permitting' <permitting@minnehahacreek.org> Cc: 'Kayla Westerlund' <kwesterlund@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: [External] Preliminary Plat Review PID 07-117-23-21-0002 / Application #LA23-000011 for "1015" Wildhurst Trail CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments. Hello, Please see the attached information for a proposed 2 lot subdivision of the property at PID 07-117-23-21- 0002 (1015 Wildhurst Trail. The address assignment is in process) formerly known as 1003 Wildhurst Trail. Preliminary Plat document named "22-008 PREPLAT 032023(1).pdf". Please review and provide comments to me by or before May 8th, note this is planned for public hearing at our May 15th planning commission meeting. Reach out to me with any questions in the meantime. Thank you, Melanie Note, the property line changes are currently under review by Hennepin County. There are three total applications recently/currently under review by the City: LA22-000050 — vacation of undeveloped right-of-way (action complete) LA23-000018 — Administrative boundary line adjustment (this is in process with Hennepin County — City's subdivision exception certificate is also attached) LA22-000011 — average lakeshore setback variance for the property to be addressed 1007 Wildhurst Trail following completion of LA23-000018 Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtisCcDci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permits and applications are handled through our online portal - LINK! Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. Existing Certs 1549909 LAND TYPE Torrens (T) DDC NUM 5991535 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Dec 24, 2022 12:42 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Amber Bougie, Registrar of Titles Daniel Rogan, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 92 Pkg ID 2523902E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7327 A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City of Orono, (the "City") has jurisdiction over the Public Right -of -Way as described in attached Exhibit A ("Right -of -Way" ); and WHEREAS, Matt Johnson (the "Owner") owns land abutting the Right -of -Way, addressed 1003 Wildhurst Trail (PID 07-117-23-21-0016 and PIDs 07-117-23-21-0006; 07-117-23-21-0007; 07- 117-23-21-0016; 07-117-23-21-0002); and WHEREAS, the Owner has filed a petition seeking a vacation of the Right -of -Way as depicted in attached Exhibit B ("Proposed Vacation"); and WHEREAS, there is an existing City sewer utility and Wright -Hennepin Electrical Cooperative overhead electric service line in the Proposed Vacation within the Hattie Place right-of-way which is serving a public purpose; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of the Proposed Vacation was submitted to the Commission of the DNR by certified mail for their continent on September 20. 2022. WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of a public hearing on the vacation of the Right -of -Way was published in the Laker Pioneer Newspaper on November 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was posted at the Long Lake and Crystal Bay Post Offices on November 4, 2022; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was mailed to each property owner affected by the Proposed Vacation on November 4, 2022, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono City Council heard all interested parties on the question of the vacation of Right -of -Way at a public hearing opened on November 21, 2022 in the City of Orono City Council Chambers; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, makes the following: FINDINGS 1. There is existing City sewer utility infrastructure and a Wright -Hennepin Electrical Cooperative overhead electric service line in the Proposed Vacation 2232540 within the Hattie Place right-of-way. The City will retain its existing 30 -foot utility easement which extends from the northern end to Wildhurst Trail. The easement retained for utilities is depicted in Exhibit B and described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place and Lafayette Avenue, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the north line of Lafayette Avenue, west of the east line of Hattie Place and its northerly extension and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). 2. The Proposed Vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. No adjacent or nearby properties will have their access limited by it. 3. The City does not intend to develop, improve, or use the existing rights-of-way for road or lake access purposes. 4. The unimproved subject rights-of-way, as they exist, serve no public purpose. 5. For the foregoing reasons, it is in the public interest to vacate only the rights-of-way as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B. DECISION NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the flight -of -Way legally described and depicted in Exhibits A and B is hereby vacated. 2. The utility easement in favor of the City will be retained and maintained for utility purposes over Hattie Place. 3. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 412.85I, the City CIerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO this 12" day of December, 2022. Mayor ATTEST: ity Clerk 2232540 EXHIBIT A — Resolution No. 7327: Description of Existing Public Right -of -Way Those parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place, Hattie Place and the AIley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie PIace lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). Those parts of Lafayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin Country, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west %2 of Lots 8- 14, BIock 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest comer of Lot 8, Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 Iying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). 2232541 i Exhibit S - Resolution No. 7327: Depiction of the Right -of -Way to be Vacated INENEPNCUN� HNIOMOUNT HOME LAFAYETTE AVENUE 14------------ � 1j ------------ 2 12 60 Uj ____ __g_ __----I_---_—i 15 60 14 I C] I 13 ¢ ---------- 12 I ,--_-------- ; W ' 5 o ---- z i C7 L I -----------10 I , I 7 , I i ____ —` DAK GLEN AVENUE ___ [WILCHURST TRAIL) 0 100 200 400 f3 92 I 16 I 15 L__....___-__ I I 74 I I ' 2 1,5 I 12 I i I I I 10 L__...____ -- I I V "I SCALE IN FEET ® TO BE VACATED �IIIIr_ : UTILITY EASEMENT l l l r TO 6E RESERVED \ \ \ \ \ - N�E� CC R1 ER F- W1/4 OF' NE� 4 OF WERANC� \ A-- r \ / / I I n r / _ 1/4 O—SEC.7_N1-NW_-CORNE '� Y / �r F MQ0i(`IT1HOM�E PARJ� � I \ \ \ \ WET/ / /V L � � 1 \x - I - / 5 \ \ \ WET / / /_\ Tim LINE OF SW1/4 OF NEI/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC.7 \ WETLAND /� SET R,L,S;#40344 — / / / / / / PP \ _\ 777 FIP 1/2 109 \ \ \ \ \ w'E?- 588.76 7- -f 7� — — T OWED TRAIL =-5b � WET WE� "\�j�J1 kg/BO.00N69. S4 \- X62/ / / // / / — �— — — — -- - - - _ �509.b� 9 4 9 9 9 0 LO \ \ \ \ 32� 39.51 ,, 8 \ 5 1 6" r SsO \ W N83`55'47"E / / / / / I I G / / / / / / / /t I /30 960 —-4 \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ gp\ — ------ ---- 0 4/ IX -,- I I `:� g IP 1/2' OPEN \ / / / / / / / / / \ V v / / Z 1 / / I ' '< I I O O O '4'_ I I:E r _-A of jRPy ILL O r 1964- GP\�P ;<� m ;1; ole, = POINT A I I—(10 / L1 _ ,— — — S88°�%'15' 5b9.b2 LLo /- - --- - _ - I N X I I / rn T- \ \ \ , �, I I I I / , / / W ; i �� ' , /I' S -I , / , /t I I I I I I / W 1 LL Ln LLJ O � I I I PP .. e / /0 AA � � I '(-, - II � _ = O Z_- \ L 2 o o -- 0 ' ('V / - J —I I— \LLI 1\ \ _ —9 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ / I 1 a\ O — ter.. /96 a/ 1 M/ tq� I � A O I L \ J I V 0 \ — W (n co 6� i Gj L..1 - / rn w / / _ Z .. W \P\\' I / L - \ \ \ \ \ \ < \ I \ I I I / 9 / 9 � P� _ / I L 1 \ \ � � _ — — — \ \ \ \ \ � \ \� \ / \ \ Z IL � � � � c � / —�f � '7`�' —L °�-� � ".. LLI -17 LLJ 4-1 \ _ _ _— — -- 1 _ ,0� -� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \\ / \ \ /®� j / o I o �� --4J__ 11 A _L — / / / / //// / / 60 P\ �:_ EDGE 40FVIDIT— ,I S89'117'115"E— ;; _I / j� � WATER LIN 1L-/ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \\ \ \ o / ��� / \ _ / o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ — — / / -� -� A' -,t? -6 �\ I SFT / \ i ul \ \ \ \ \ FIFIP 1/2' pPE O^ ' —/ w' �- _ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I g� A _-114-1 S8 0117' 5'E 1 0.01 z ' \ \ cn / , g�� T / A _j Z W \ \ \ 7 W r.. — d / tL \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / LL / 3l / I/ / I Ld w a a" / O 98 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ e. \ WET WET \ / I O w �'/ k 447 9�2 I I / / y I 30 .. 30 o aI —0 N8°7�7 1�1j1� 58 50 v o� �O / / g42'— — D 22—/ I�-� LI " H rt _ N — /cn in \ \ \ —\ ,L —�� — OI- _ Lo — JJ I� O� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ WETLAND WET CO WOLLI Z I / / .: Ld O / Q 0 I< I I A r \ / Ln 0 \ `, A I I - FIP r1/2' OPEN FIP 1/2' DP W -----ELINE OF THE 1/2�WET -Q w w 9426AC � �V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C o w z i I / 't \ 0F, LOTS 1-3, BLdCK 4 I— \ 1 I/ I �438 C Q4 �1/ /1\ V / T I� �, 88 -17 -x -5-E \ FUTUREED 8" SOM�E�WER TO SERVICE N O /\\`' / / / /A/ g� - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �� \1 v \ 77/77777, PROFILE TO BE DETERMMIED UPON ggo \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ DEVELOP [�1ENT OF FUTUR LOTS. ( 11E TO ERIST\G SANITAR� MANHOLEI`\\\ J / / / �I ; / / / / �93\ <\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 ��° SMH MH -93 9 WET Cp 932 WIj All 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ x, O WI ET I I 00 � O� I WET .. �A .. .. .4 � � I I — cp \ L� T 96' \ \ I r0., I WET br WETLAND I N� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I —� WETOR t \ _ IIAll 7 610o ---- \ 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ — — — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O> \ \ \ \ O \ \ \ 990 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I I I a / WET 0y° \ — 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I n I 1 ,ET .. WETLAND 14 WETLAND � I 70 20 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � I I I I I I I I I _ O � 11 I \ -S. LINE OF LOT 38 30 �; I I r BLOCK 4 SET R� #40 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I I I / WET S 8 8 °2 ' �� PP _ FIP 1/2' OPEN 'I _ \ 74 \ 63 .75 \\—�� -� -�-��- I --I- I -� �—I JIN z 4sGN 22 E 238.15 \ \ FIP RLS# \ I 30.00 \ GYP �\ �lJ 0 1 1 \S\ S. LINE O$88025 SWj' NEI/4 of 664.0 \ \ \ I I I IP ]t/2' OPEN �I _ — — — / EC. \ \ I I I I I I I I o I I I - H�v-sz4.1 M ICS o — M r V ,TM—HRIM-9322 p 30 30 V A \ \ \ I FIP RLS#\I FTP RLS# Lf� A DP 12"PVP STORM PIPE / IP 1/2' OPEN 1 / n \ 1 r- \ n/ n r1\ \\ Ln \ n/ I I r� I I r� i ;I \�I K \' ,/-\\ Iv/ 1 i L _ IV/ IV\ ` ' / d , <, I �I , I I \ 0 O I \ // LI I I V I \ I \ \ I\ 1\ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ o V V I L _ L 0\ A\ 30 1 4.5 NORTH LAND SURVEYING 13401 Preston Road Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Tel: 612-597-0453 www.45NorthLS.com 45NorthLandSurveying@gmail.com 2 1r 2t x a X Fence ties are shown on the 73 o .= I a c side of the boundary line that m J LL J x� the fence is located on. 4t x LEGAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY THE CONTRACT CLIENT HAS AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE/USE THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY OR CADD FILE IN IT'S CURRENT FORM FOR ITS ORIGINAL INTENDED PURPOSE. ANY SUBMITTAL OF THIS SURVEY TO ANY 3 PARTY FOR PERMITTING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE MADE ONLY IN THE NAME OF THE CLIENT, OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE AS NAMED HEREON. THE MODIFICATION OF THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY/ EXHIBIT OR CADD FILE IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM 45 NORTH COMPANY, LLC. SHEET 2 OF 2 LEGEND 0 50 100 41 CAST IRON MONUMENT SCALE IN FEET O SURVEY MONUMENT SET Bearing shown hereon are based on the Hennepin 40 SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND County Coordinate System (NAD83-1986). Plat 0 SURVEY CONTROL POINT bearings are localized to this bearing basis. d FLARED END SECTION VICINITY MAP D4 GATE VALVE .1, GUY WIRE �� HYDRANT a,} LIGHT POLE 47 LANDSCAPE LIGHT W Bra � r POWER POLE - SMHO SANITARY MANHOLE 0 SANITARY CLEANOUT ® STORM DRAIN - ROUND SI TE sae 0 STORM DRAIN - SQUARE Forest STMH O STORM MANHOLE Lake INV= INVERT ELEVATION C� SIGN .972.5 GROUND ELEVATION Ac ❑ A/C UNIT Q HENNEPIN COUNTY WELL TWP.117 RNG.23. SEC.07 WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION GFE TOF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CERTIFICATE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. © COMM. PEDESTAL OF © COMM. CONNECTION 1 TRANS ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER SURVEY OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE OE ELECTRIC METER © GAS METER PREPARED FOR: © GAS MANHOLE N ❑H GAS VALVE HAND HOLE MATT SOIL BORING TREE CONIFEROUS JOHNSON TREE DECIDUOUS OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL a===— TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ou UTILITY MANHOLE Q] UTILITY PEDESTAL BITUMINOUS CONCRETE —X—X— FENCE BSBL BUILDING SETBACK LINE -9j25 - CONTOUR EXISTING 9j2.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED GUARD RAIL DT DRAIN TILE CERTIFICATION ELC ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND I hereby certify that this survey, plan CTV COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND or report was prepared by me or under GAS GAS UNDERGROUND my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the OHU OVERHEAD UTILITY laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated CL RAILROAD TRACKS this 21 day of March, 2023. > SANITARY SEWER '> STORM SEWER TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND \ I WATERMAIN 0 CURBSTOP David B. Pemberton Minnesota License No. 40344 SUBMITAL/REVISION Original Survey: 3/21/2023 4/5/2023 - Overall Future layout 1r 2t x a X Fence ties are shown on the 73 o .= I a c side of the boundary line that m J LL J x� the fence is located on. 4t x LEGAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY THE CONTRACT CLIENT HAS AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE/USE THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY OR CADD FILE IN IT'S CURRENT FORM FOR ITS ORIGINAL INTENDED PURPOSE. ANY SUBMITTAL OF THIS SURVEY TO ANY 3 PARTY FOR PERMITTING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE MADE ONLY IN THE NAME OF THE CLIENT, OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE AS NAMED HEREON. THE MODIFICATION OF THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY/ EXHIBIT OR CADD FILE IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM 45 NORTH COMPANY, LLC. SHEET 2 OF 2 PARCEL 1 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23 NOTES 1) Site Address: 1003 Wildhurst Tr, Orono, MN 55364 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No.27053C0824F , effective date of November 4, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 439,201 s.f. - 10.08± acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on Hennepin County Control Station: FOREST which has an elevation of: 945.54 feet (NAVD88). Contours shown hereon were derived from a combination of field observations and LiDAR data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR -1B (One Family Residential District) per the City of Orono's zoning map.: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR -1B (One Family Residential District) per the Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s) 50 feet ( xxx Road) Side: 30 feet Rear: 50 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer. Height: 30 feet Hardcover: xx percent of lot area * A Zoning Classification Letter from the client must be provided to the surveyor. All zoning, setback information and hardcover information shown here on must be verified by all parties involved in the planning and design process for this project. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 6) Utilities: Underground utilities shown hereon are by observed evidence only. We have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. It is the clients responsibility to create a Gopher State One Call ticket. Seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION The wetland delineation was performed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. and was flagged on August 10, 2022. PARCEL 2 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West 1/2 of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 1; All of Block 3 the West 1/2 of Lots 1 and 2, and all of Lots 9 to 16 inclusive, Block 4 and That part of the West 1/2 of Lots 3 to 8, inclusive, Except that part of the Southerly 220 feet of said Lots lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the center of the South line of Lot 8; thence to a point on the West line of Lot 3, said point measured 220 feet North from the South line of Block 4, All in Mount Home Park. (Per Certificate of Title Certificate Number 1549909) Together with: Those parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place, Hattie Place and the Alley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail) Those parts of LaFayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west 1/2 of Lots 8-14, Block 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). NOTES 1) Site Address: 1003 Wildhurst Tr, Orono, MN 55364 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No.27053C0824F , effective date of November 4, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 201,470 s.f. - 4.63± acres Net Area: 180,889 s.f. - 4.15± acres (measured to 929.4 OHW) 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on Hennepin County Control Station: FOREST which has an elevation of: 945.54 feet (NAVD88). Contours shown hereon were derived from a combination of field observations and LiDAR data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR -1B (One Family Residential District) per the City of Orono's zoning map.: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s) 35 feet Side: 10 feet (Interior) Side: 20 feet (Street) Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Wetland: 25 feet or MCWD buffer. Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area * A Zoning Classification Letter from the client must be provided to the surveyor. All zoning, setback information and hardcover information shown here on must be verified by all parties involved in the planning and design process for this project. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 6) Utilities: Underground utilities shown hereon are by observed evidence only. We have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. It is the clients responsibility to create a Gopher State One Call ticket. Seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION The wetland delineation was performed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. and was flagged on August 10, 2022. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING PARCEL A: The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL Al: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 306.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. Area: 34,596± sq. ft. - 0.79± acres DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A2: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 306.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. Area: 405,019± sq. ft.- 9.30± acres DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PARCEL B That part of the following parcel: The West 1/2 of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 1; All of Block 3 The West 1/2 of Lots 1 and 2, and all of Lots 9 to 16 inclusive, Block 4 and hat part of the West 1/2 of Lots 3 to 8, inclusive, Except that part of the Southerly 220 feet of said Lots lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point i n the center of the South line of Lot 8; thence to a point on the West line of Lot 3, said point measured 220 feet North from the South line of Block 4, All in Mount Home Park. Together with: hose parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place, Hattie Place and the Alley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail) Those parts of LaFayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west 1/2 of Lots 8-14, Block 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 150.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence continuing along the last described line a distance of 156.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. described as lying north of the following line: Beginning at the aformentioned said Point "A"; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes, 15 seconds East, parallel to said north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 509.02 feet to the east line of said West Half of Lots 8 through 14, Block 1, Mount Home Park and there terminating. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PARCEL C That part of the following parcel: The West 1/2 of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 1; All of Block 3 The West 1/2 of Lots 1 and 2, and all of Lots 9 to 16 inclusive, Block 4 and hat part of the West 1/2 of Lots 3 to 8, inclusive, Except that part of the Southerly 220 feet of said Lots lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point i n the center of the South line of Lot 8; thence to a point on the West line of Lot 3, said point measured 220 feet North from the South line of Block 4, All in Mount Home Park. Together with: hose parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place, Hattie Place and the Alley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail) Those parts of LaFayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west 1/2 of Lots 8-14, Block 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 150.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence continuing along the last described line a distance of 156.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. described as lying north of the following line: Beginning at the aformentioned said Point "A"; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes, 15 seconds East, parallel to said north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 509.02 feet to the east line of said West Half of Lots 8 through 14, Block 1, Mount Home Park and there terminating. 1 45 NORTH LAND SURVEYING 13401 Preston Road Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Tel: 612-597-0453 www.45NorthLS.com 45NorthLandSurveying@gmail.com 0 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Bearing shown hereon are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD83-1986). Plat bearings are localized to this bearing basis. VICINITY MAP WB. �O7 . 01 SITE Forest Lake I HENNEPIN COUNTY I TWP.117 RNG.23. SEC.07 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PREPARED FOR: MATT JOHNSON CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 21st day of March, 2023. David B. Pemberton Minnesota License No. 40344 SUBMITAL/REVISION Original Survey: 3/21/2023 4/5/2023 - Overall future layout LEGAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY THE CONTRACT CLIENT HAS AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE/USE THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY OR CADD FILE IN IT'S CURRENT FORM FOR ITS ORIGINAL INTENDED PURPOSE. ANY SUBMITTAL OF THIS SURVEY TO ANY 3 PARTY FOR PERMITTING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE MADE ONLY IN THE NAME OF THE CLIENT, OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE AS NAMED HEREON. THE MODIFICATION OF THIS HARDCOPY SURVEY/ EXHIBIT OR CADD FILE IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM 45 NORTH COMPANY, LLC. SHEET 1 OF 2 V4 Ig IS -- 4WA I %Ii I I yot Vk .46 4 1-� 7IU lzv, 1 38 07-117-23 12 0003 38 07-117-23 210013 38 07-117-23 24 0034 BRAD PFAFF MELISSA J MUNSCH CITY OF ORONO 993 WILDHURST TR 1001 WILDHURST TR P O BOX 66 MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 12 0009 38 07-117-23 210014 38 07-117-23 24 0035 JOSEPH R FELDMANN LAURA SANDEN & DANIEL SANDEN CITY OF ORONO DONELLE L FELDMANN 4505 WEST BRANCH RD P O BOX 66 805 FOREST ARMS LA MOUND MN 55364 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0216 38 07-117-23 210015 38 07-117-23 24 0045 RITA JANE ZEBECK JANE E KLINE ANA E & MATTHEW E CARTER 4658 CARLTON DUNES DR #14 4455 WEST BRANCH RD 1006 WILDHURST TR AMELIA ISLAND FL 32034 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0217 38 07-117-23 210016 38 07-117-23 24 0046 PETER J RYSKAMP MATTHEW JOHNSON KENNETH C PETERSON LISA M V RYSKAMP 1003 WILDHURST TR 1074 WILDHURST TR 1000 WILD14URST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 210002 38 07-117-23 24 0011 CHRISTOPHER D MORGART ROBIN E WOOLEY & LORI WOOLEY 1003 WILDHURST TR 1080 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 210003 38 07-117-23 24 0029 THOMAS W FLECK ANDREA J YANKOUPE LAURIE A FLECK 1085 WILDHURST TR 995 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 HOPKINS MN 55343 38 07-117-23 210004 38 07-117-23 24 0030 BRIAN L & ANN K TURBEVILLE EILEEN M ROBERTS 997 WILDHURST TRL 1045 WILDHURST TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 210005 38 07-117-23 24 0031 TONY SCOTT STINAR VIOLETTA KORABEL ALISON STINAR IGOR KORABEL 999 WILDHURST TR 742 REGENCY LANE E MOUND MN 55364 HOPKINS MN 55343 38 07-117-23 210006 38 07-117-23 24 0032 MATTHEW JOHNSON JACOB J GOERGEN 1003 WILDHURST TR APRIL L WILL MOUND MN 55364 15675 DARLING PATH ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 38 07-117-23 210007 38 07-117-23 24 0033 MATTHEW JOHNSON CITY OF ORONO 1003 WILDHURST TR P O BOX 66 MOUND MN 55364 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/21/2023 4505 1945 i� tSi E-Wildhu 999 ❑e, .. 199£ tas� we. Orono foao ,aas 1684 M) 7137 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I 1 1 1003 Wildhurst Trail This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 04/03/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/14/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 06/13/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: May 15, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000020, Jamie Grant, 3020 Casco Point Road Average Lakeshore Setback Variance — Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the expansion of a deck. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is requesting an average Lakeshore setback variance to expand a deck on the lakeside of the home. The single-family home has an existing deck that was constructed prior to the City's current regulations and does not meet the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing to expand the deck by approximately 205 square feet and the deck will be closer to the lake by seven feet in order to have better use and enjoyment of the deck. The proposed deck meets all other required setbacks including the 75 -foot lakeshore setback and complies with hardcover. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the existing conditions of the property as a practical difficulty. The entirety of the existing deck is in front of the average lakeshore setback line, which does not allow for any expansion. The home is situated on the property in such a way that the expansion of said deck would not impact the lake views of the neighboring properties. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The existing deck does not comply with the average Lakeshore setback requirement and expansion is not possible without a variance. The deck expansion does not impact the neighboring properties site lines and therefore meets the intent of the ordinance. There is a dense line of evergreen trees on the western property line that screens the subject property from the northern neighboring property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1C District Required Existing Proposed Rea r/Street 30' 65' 65' North Side 10' 19' 19' South Side 10' 24' 24' Lakeshore 75' Deck - 104' 97' Average Lakeshore The entire deck (existing and proposed expansion) the ALS is within FILE #LA23-000020 May 15, 2023 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: LR -16 District Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 25,300 s.f. (0.58 acre) 111' @ 75'/ 111' @ OHWL Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Total Area Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 6,325 s.f. 4,829 s.f. 5,034 s.f. Tier 1 25,300 s.f. (25 %) (19.1%) (19.9%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The intent of the ordinance is to protect the lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties. Structures over 42 inches in height are prohibited in front of the average lakeshore setback line. This line is measured from the most lakeward point of each neighboring home or structure. The existing deck on the subject property is in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Expansion of this deck is not permitted without a variance as the deck is over 42 inches in height. The subject property is oriented in a way that the existing deck and proposed deck expansion does not impact the lake views for either the neighbor to the north or the south. The neighbor's views of the lake are protected and therefore the intent of the ordinance is met. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The average lakeshore setback variance is required for the expansion of a lakeside deck. The current deck is within the average lakeshore setback and therefore expansion would not be permitted. The intent of the ordinance is to preserve and protect lake views enjoyed from neighboring properties. The neighboring properties to the north and south are positioned in a way that the existing deck and the proposed expansion does not impact views of the lake. The requested expansion of approximately 205 square feet is minimal, does not impact lake views, and increases enjoyment of the subject property. This criterion is met. FILE #LA23-000020 May 15, 2023 Page 3 of 5 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance resulting in an expanded lakeside deck for a residential use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. There have been instances when the City has granted variances from average lakeshore setback when the proposal does not disrupt neighboring views of the lake and is not within the 75 -foot setback. The proposed deck expansion is not likely to impact any lake views and is not within the 75 -foot setback. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The existing deck was constructed prior to the City's current regulations. The current deck is nonconforming and within the average lakeshore setback. The expansion of the deck increases the use and enjoyment of the lake property and is a reasonable request. The proposal preserves the intent of the ordinance by not disrupting any neighboring lake views. This criterion is met. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing house and deck were not constructed by the current property owners. The applicant is requesting the average lakeshore setback variance to expand the existing deck for better use and fit for the current family's needs; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance resulting in the expansion of a lakeside deck will not alter the character of the locality. The existing deck will be expanded by approximately 205 square feet and will be 7 feet closer to the lake resulting in a 97 foot setback from the OWHL. The expansion is minimal and will not impact the lake views from either neighboring property. The neighbor to the north is screened by a well-established tree line along the property line and the neighbor to the south's home viewshed is oriented away from the subject property line. All other setbacks including the 75 -foot lakeshore setback and hardcover are met. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing nonconforming deck and the position of the FILE #LA23-000020 May 15, 2023 Page 4 of 5 property in relation to the neighboring homes is unique. The neighbor to the north is screened by a well-established tree line along the property line and the neighbor to the south's home viewshed is oriented away from the subject property line. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The request is specific to this property as it relates to an existing nonconforming deck. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed expansion of the nonconforming deck preserves the property owner's right to enjoy the lakeyard. The minor expansion does not negatively impact the neighboring properties or their views of the lake. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances allow for the construction of an expanded deck in order for it to be used and enjoyed by the current property owners. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has provided acknowledgement forms from the neighboring properties. However, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The expanded deck should not impact the views of the lake enjoyed by the neighboring properties due to the position of the property and existing well-established vegetation. The expanded deck will allow the current property owner to use and enjoy the lakeside deck without negatively impacting the surrounding properties. Staff is supportive of the requested average lakeshore setback variance. FILE #LA23-000020 May 15, 2023 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit C. Site Plan Exhibit D. Narrative Exhibit E. Deck Plans Exhibit F. Average Lakeshore Setback Exhibit G. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Photos Exhibit 1. Neighbor Acknowledgements Exhibit J. Mailing List & Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 04/03/2023 Address: 3020 Casco Point RD Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723340025 Land Use Number: LA23-000020 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: JAMIE GRANT Address: 3020 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Jamie Grant Company: Address: 3020 Casco Point Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 jamie@jmie-grmt.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Replace and Extend deck beyond setback line Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception _. Vacation Application 0 Varia nce Application 0 Applicant Signature: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000020 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The use would be for outdoor family dining and reading 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The house was built prior to the Average Lakeshore Setback ordinance being established in 1992. The current landowner purchased the property in 2021 and did not create the circumstances to which the proposed deck replacement and extension is now subject to. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The character of the locality will not be affected by the granting of the variance. The proposed structure is bordered by trees to the north and has limited visibility for anyone to the south. The proposed structure extends the existing structure by 7ft and should not cause any negative essential differences to the character. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations alone do not constitute the reason for the requested variance. The existing structure is limited in size and does not support the property owner's extended family. The proposed size of the deck is inline with other decks in the area. S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The property owner's use of the deck for dining and reading does not fall under the "not -allowed" use Chapter. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The special conditions are peculiar because the property and neighboring property were constructed prior to the creation of the average lakeshore setback ordinance. The tree line between the property to the north also obstructs lake views for properties on either side 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The other homes on the street generally fall —60ft from the street. With the curvature of the cove there is a zero/narrow band for improvements for most properties within the setback zone to the north but adequate room for improvements for the properties to the south. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The property owner believes this to be true, that the proposed extension of the deck is the best use of the land to support family gatherings as well as maximizing the enjoyment and use of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of the proposed variance will not impair health, safety, comfort or morals. The proposed new deck will be aesthetically pleasing and increase the safety and comfort of the existing structure. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The granting of the variance is not merely for the convenience to the applicant. The properties unique characteristics and curvature of the cove make any rear exterior improvements to the property difficult to accomplish within the setback zone. The granting of the variance will also improve the aesthetics of the property for view from other properties surrounding the cove. PC Exhibit C Variance Narrative Property: 3020 Casco Point Rd Wayzata MN 55391 Lot: The property's existing deck structure was built more than 20yrs ago and is shaped in a way that makes the narrow end of the deck (close to half the deck's length) unusable for most functions one would use a deck for — sitting, cooking, dining etc.. The existing deck structure does not provide enough space for extended family gatherings and for maneuverability of elderly family members, one of whom is wheelchair bound. See diagram below: Proposed deck extension M M M Existing narrow area of limited use Additionally, the usable under -deck space is limited to the narrow end of the deck which currently at only 5.5ft in width, provides little protection to either people or furniture from inclement weather when outdoors. See picture below: The owner proposes to extend the deck outward by 3 feet on the narrow end and 6 feet on the wider end to make the narrow -end of the deck usable and to provide under -deck shelter, and to make the wider part of the deck support family functions. Lastly, it is the owner's understanding that the Average Lakeshore Setback regulations are intended to ensure neighboring property's views are not obstructed. The proposed deck extension in no way restricts lake views of either property to the north or south as there is already a large row of evergreen trees extending all the way to the lakeshore along the northern property boundary (see picture below). Additionally, both neighbors are supportive of the deck extension. If the Planning Department is not supportive of the full deck extension, the owner hopes they would consider at a minimum the extension of the narrow portion of the deck by 3 feet, to at least make the deck "whole" as such. Thank you. 3"Concrete 5lab on4"gravel bed _ Existing 2x0 ' KITCHEN JOISTS New Ledger (200) 4a4Stair Posts Sliding Door Gontinouil Stair / - - Kitchen Door Existing Spigot an 14" Concrete Rail Window _ 3"Concrete 5lab on 4"G avelBed DININGROOM Existing Le4ger(2x10) Existing Window i Exiing2xlo DblHeader Joinstt Hangers Extended Ledger 6x6poet - Electrical s + {OverlappedlpoubledOF- 2) \ Dbl.JoiSto Fixture Continuous el Stair Chimney h N it { I DbLJoietHangers Angle.`t I Bracket � 14"Cont. to Footing 6x6 Posts _` i5 - 4x4 5tair Posts -- on 14° Concrete Footing 14"ConcreTe Angled 2x70 g 18" Concrete Footing ' Footing Joint ` JOISTS: 200 Pressure -Treated (P.T.), 5outhern Pine (5P) 16" on center Hangers ! 6x6 Posts BEAM5: 200 (2) P,T. 5P Attached to Posts with Galvanized 6x6 Post Gaps 1 I i POSTS: 6x6 P.T. 5P Attached to footing wlGa Iva nixed 6x6 Post Anchor RAILING POSTS: 4x4 PT SP - 6k Apart Simpson Angled - DECKING: 1"x 5.5" composite, run lengthwise POST FOOTING: 14" x 44" Concrete 4xa ilingPost (,'Apart 5TAIRFOOTING:14"x 44 Concrete 14"Concrete Footing 3020 Casco Point Road RAILING: Gable Railing wl3" spacing Deck Plan City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 3020 Casco Point Rd Prepared by: Jamie Grant Date: 09/23/2023 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) Example (Garage) 24' x 30' 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 720 S.F. A House + Garage 55 x 27 1485 S. F. B House 20 x 25 500 S. F. C House 25 x 19 475 S. F. D Patio 1 6 x 15 90 S. F. E Patio 17x15 255 S.F. F Walk Way 65 x 3 195 S. F. G Driveway 65 x 21 1365 S. F. H Deck 25.5 x 13 332 S. F. I Deck 22.5 x 6 135 S. F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 4829 S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover j 0 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 4829 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 25,300 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: July 2018 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 3020 Casco Point Rd Prepared by: Jamie Grant Date: 09/23/2023 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survev (Square Feet) Example (Garage) 24' x 30' S. F. 720 S.F. A House + Garage 55 x 27 1485 S. F. B House 20 x 25 500 S. F. C House 25x19 475 S.F. D Patio 1 6 x 15 90 S. F. E Patio 2 14 x15 210 S. F. F walk way 65 x 3 195 S. F. G Driveway 65 x 21 1365 S. F. H Deck 25.5 x 13 332 S. F. Deck 22.5 x 6 135 S. F. Deck extension 25.5 x 7 179 S. F. K Deck extension 22.5 x 3 68 S. F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V S.F. W S.F. x S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 5034 S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See Citv Code Sec 78-1684): 2) Total Excludable Hardcover 3) Net Proposed Hardcover [E 4) Total Lot Area btract line (2) from line (1 Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] Last Updated: July 2018 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. o S.F. 5034 S. F. 25,300 S.F. 19.9 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 A P ■EMEL.■rY,■;r ��ri�iuim��n�f��rfr�i ll�ltii puirFnu frnti.. -� '" • $;fin. '; s MOM aft y i h a MEN �i icon" 'M ti a ait yy +!AL. OMIT `Y ref 1'�' 1.,4 �1.�, 4 ;y •,, 1 [print name(s)) (pint address] 1 have re4wod the pians for tho proposed inpfovernert or proposed .rse V the F —N,j,v f :- .5r 4 tib �•��� CL A _ also referred to as i.ar.0 Use Application No. I (WV) undulslarid that in exerut:ng this acknowledgement, I (wol am faro) rot asked To oisaaproval of tIte property or .ise but merely to conf rm for the City Council that I (wo) an improvement plans and ;hat tree ;Noposed neighhcx's Woject or use requires Council approval Prop rh' i}y. +�r Date Properi r Owner Datc It gnu have any infarm8tion that mav aSsist lhF C: ty in tyle review of this land Appl-Cation. plear,C submit your rornments to thn Hudd ng 8 Zoning Offir..e at le days prior to the scl'edulec rreatinq rate. •.. •... • ••.•.N.•.1.... ...............♦.♦ •RHA1'R Rt R............ ••.....r••�. Net NTT�RR�11f���RtIK•�•—.•.. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [.-rint name(s)] [pant address) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or prnpcsed use of the �d Lg r(%,1,Q CSG ,V'N1 C. -Q also referred to as Land Use AFpl cation No. - I fwe) understand that in executing this ackrowtedgement. I (we) am (are) rat asKed ti disapproval of +12e arop_erly or use but Terely to ronf rrr. for the City Cowx;il that I (we) 2 improv plans aid hat pro 'osed neighbor's project nr rise requires CojnGi anprov, P perty Owner Date 0 Property Ower Date Owner 6L PC Exhibit I RUN DATE: 04/04/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 20-117-23 310033 38 20-117-23 310063 38 20-117-23 34 0012 D B DAU & J N DAU III D-DARE TRUST/M W-ABBOTT TRU ZDENKA FENIKOVA 2920 CASCO POINT RD 2965 CASCO POINT RD 3045 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DENISE B DAU DENNIS-DARE TRUST ZDENKA FENIKOVA JAMES N DAU III MICHELE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TRU 3045 CASCO POINT RD 2920 CASCO POINT RD 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310034 38 20-117-23 310064 38 20-117-23 34 0017 JONATHAN A MENTH DENNIS-DARE LIV TRUST DORIS MOLITOR-WATERS 2930 CASCO POINT RD 2967 CASCO POINT RD 3061 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN A MENTH TIMOTHY J OARE DORIS MOLITOR-WATERS 2930 CASCO POINT RD LESLIE M OARE 3061 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310035 38 20-117-23 310065 38 20-117-23 34 0018 R G SORENSEN/S D SORENSEN CITY OF ORONO J W DENNIS IRREV SUB TRUST 2940 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3055 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT G SORENSEN THE CITY OF ORONO JOHN W DENNIS IRREV SUBTRUST STACI D SORENSEN P O BOX 66 C/O JOHN W DENNIS 2940 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 3055 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310036 38 20-117-23 34 0001 38 20-117-23 34 0025 PAUL F JOHNCOX JAY S HULBERT TRUSTEE JAMIE GRANT 2948 CASCO POINT RD 3035 CASCO POINT RD 3020 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL F JOHNCOX JAY S HULBERT JAMIE GRANT 2948 CASCO POINT RD 3035 CASCO POINT RD 3020 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310038 38 20-117-23 34 0002 38 20-117-23 34 0026 EDWARD PEKARIK JR I S STANDA TR/S S STANDA TR JOEL CARLSON 2990 CASCO POINT RD 3025 CASCO POINT RD 3026 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ED PEKARIK JR STEVEN S STANDA JOEL CARLSON 2990 CASCO POINT RD IRENE S STANDA 3026 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 3025 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310045 38 20-117-23 34 0003 38 20-117-23 34 0028 NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN D P SEIDEL & H N SEIDEL WATERTOWER LLC 2975 CASCO POINT RD 3015 CASCO POINT RD 3001 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN DANIEL & HELENA SEIDEL WATERTOWER LLC 2975 CASCO POINT RD 3015 CASCO PT RD 5100 MIRROR LAKE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 EDINA MN 55436 38 20-117-23 310047 38 20-117-23 34 0005 38 20-117-23 34 0029 MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR PHILLIP S WHIPPLE WATERTOWER LLC 2941 CASCO POINT RD 3095 CASCO POINT RD 3005 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR PHILLIP S WHIPPLE WATERTOWER LLC 2941 CASCO POINT RD 3095 CASCO POINT RD 5100 MIRROR LAKE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 EDINA MN 55436 38 20-117-23 310048 38 20-117-23 34 0006 38 20-117-23 42 0005 NANCY G BROWN K E RICHEY & S J RICHEY VIL OF ORONO 2933 CASCO POINT RD 3105 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 NANCY G BROWN KENT E & SUSAN J RICHEY CITY OF ORONO 2933 CASCO POINT RD 3105 CASCO PT RD PO BOX 66 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 310060 38 20-117-23 34 0010 38 20-117-23 42 0006 J A MARTINSON ET AL TRUSTEES CHERYL CORYEA HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2970 CASCO POINT RD 3085 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JERRY & BONNIE MARTINSON CHERYL CORYEA HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2970 CASCO POINT RD S 3085 CASCO POINT RD NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 LAKE MTKA 38 20-117-23 310061 38 20-117-23 34 0011 38 20-117-23 42 0027 J R MILLER & A R MILLER JERRAMIE VONDALL & K VONDALL JAMES & TERA WHITE TRUST 2980 CASCO POINT RD 3065 CASCO POINT RD 3560 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN R & AMY R MILLER JERRAMIE VONDALL JAMES C WHITE 2980 CASCO POINT RD KIMBERLY VONDALL TERA R WHITE WAYZATA MN 55391 3065 CASCO POINT RD 3560 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE: 04/04/2023 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 20-117-23 42 0029 Z STROUT & M STROUT 3525 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ZEBADIAH STROUT MOLLY STROUT 3525 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0034 TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC 3545 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC 5413 MANITOU RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 42 0035 SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW 3535 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW 3535 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0040 R KOCON AND J GIBNEY 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 RUSSELL KOCON JACQUELINE GIBNEY 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 PATRICK KINZIE/MORGAN KINZIE 3040 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 PATRICK KINZIE MORGAN KINZIE 3040 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0042 DANIEL H COX 3277 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL H COX 3277 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0043 DANIEL H COX 3277 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL H COX 3277 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0044 S A STRUCK/J W STRUCK TRUST 3287 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 SARAH ANN STRUCK JAN WILLIAM STRUCK 3287 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0045 L B KAERCHER & J D KAERCHER 3297 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 LISA B KAERCHER JOHN DAVID KAERCHER 3297 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0048 B V NELSON & D R NELSON 3305 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 BRIAN V & DAWN R NELSON 3305 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0049 L & J BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 LAWRENCE L BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0051 WILLIAM D GUST 3034 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM D GUST 3034 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0052 KRISTEN M/ANDREW V RONNINGEN 3030 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 KRISTEN & ANDREW RONNINGEN 3030 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0054 LEISEL & MARK PFLEGHAAR 3509 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 LEISEL & MARK PFLEGHAAR 3509 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0055 DONALD JAMES KAVANAGH 3038 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DONALD JAMES KAVANAGH 3038 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 4/4/2023 -f + �9an 291291fi ?41 2895 {72I 2918 D20 2905 2905 ¢rs 2917 +J 930 € !r� 17. 2IJ25 " ' a8 3'50 2927 0 3546 ill iglu 293a 95 #� 3534 - t 5 rias 4� {j 3525 302nD 300 5 32!77 Ph 3915 27 3287 ws 32971 635x} 3355 C55 ai 3100 Casco atzs Point Park 3T27 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3020 Casco Point Rd This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us 269713ate Application Received: 04/19/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/20/2023 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 06/19/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 15 May 2023 Subject: #LA23-000021, Teresa Elsbernd with Home Reflections o/b/o John & Leslie Cadle, 2691 Ethel Avenue Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct minor changes or additions to the home, and a reoriented deck, lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The property is situated entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line which is determined by the locations of the homes on the two immediately adjacent lakeshore neighbors. In this case, the neighboring home at 2697 is situated behind the subject property and results in an average lakeshore setback line which significantly impacts the buildable area, see Exhibit C. The owners would like to construct minor additions to the home. Due to the average Lakeshore setback line, variances are required in order to expand the volume and/or footprint of the home in any manner. The applicant is proposing to expand the deck on the lake side with a squared off configuration to replace the existing circular deck and add new stair cases; raise the roof over the northeastern portion of the home (owners' bedroom) to increase the symmetry of the roofline; and construct a new entry with a covered/roofed porch. They plan to remove a circular portion of deck extending off the southeast corner of the home. An average lakeshore setback variance is required. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the extreme setback of the adjacent home at 2697 Ethel Avenue as the primary practical difficulty supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff agrees that the location of the existing home at 2697 Ethel Avenue creates an unreasonably severe setback contributing significantly to the practical difficulty on this property. FILE # LA23-000021 15 May 2023 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET on 78-350 and 78-1279 — Setbacks: LR -1C DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear / Street 30' 73' No Change 29.1' house 29.1' House North Side 10' Hardcover Tier 24' deck 20.8' deck 36.4' House 6,900 s.f. 8,417 s.f. Tier 1 33,836 s.f. 36.4' House South Side 10' 30.9' deck 33.5' deck 91.8' house 91.8' house Lakeshore 75' 82.6' deck 84.3' deck The existing home entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed improvements will not encroach Average Lakeshore closer to the lake the existing deck although the deck will change shape. Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 33,836 s.f. (0.77 acre) 110' @ 75'/ 27' @ OHWL Section 78-1403 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 33,836 s.f. (0.77 acre) Allowed: 6,767 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 2,389 s.f. (7%) Proposed: 2,510 s.f. (7.4%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 8,459 s.f. 6,900 s.f. 8,417 s.f. Tier 1 33,836 s.f. (25 %) (20.4%) (24.9%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Code Section 78-1279) The subject property is situated entirely lakeward of the home on 2697 Ethel Avenue (a Lakeshore flag lot), which results in the application of a severe average lakeshore setback impacting the subject property. The entire home on the subject property is lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; any volume expansions or footprint changes require a variance. The additions to the home have been designed to improve the aesthetics of the home while FILE # LA23-000021 15 May 2023 Page 3 of 5 minimize the impact to the adjacent properties and the views of the lake. The proposed one -foot roof expansion in height is minor and should not significantly impact views of the lake enjoyed by the neighbors. The front entry porch is on the street side of the home and also should not impact lake views. The reconstructed deck will generally be in the same footprint; however, the applicant is proposing to remove the curved portion and square off the corners. The new deck and stair will be no closer to the lake than existing; however, the expansion towards the north is a new encroachment. Due to the average lakeshore setback, no improvements can be constructed on the lake side of the home without variances. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The property includes difficulties in its shape and the location of adjacent homes. The average lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to construct additions to the home on this property are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit the home modifications in the proposed location entirely within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to the lakeshore, the existing vegetative screening, the topography, and adjacent properties. The request is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The unique shape of the property neighboring home locations prevent changes or expansions of the home consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed overall hardcover level is conforming. The circumstances are unique to the property; and FILE # LA23-000021 15 May 2023 Page 4 of 5 c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is requested in order to permit construction of additions to the home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's unique orientation with respect to the lakeshore and the adjacent homes create difficulties for the Owners in improving the property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's unique shape and the extreme setback of the adjacent home on the flag lot creates difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary, and does not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has submitted comments from the neighbors which were generally supportive. The comments are attached as Exhibit I. Issues for Consideration Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the FILE # LA23-000021 15 May 2023 Page 5 of 5 essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the average Lakeshore setback variance as requested. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Conditions Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Additional Plan Detail Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit 1. Neighbor Comments Exhibit J. Resolution No. 3268 Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map 4/24/23, 4:36 PM Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Permit List I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary 04/19/2023 2691 Ethel AVE Orono, MN 55391 2011723240046 LA23-000021 Agent on behalf of property owner Name: John & Leslie Cadle Address: John and Leslie Cadle Name: Teresa Elsbernd Applicant: Company: Home Reflections, Inc. Address: 4951 Kensington Gate Shorewood, MN 55331 teresa@homereflectionsinc.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Leslie Cadle lacadle@gmail.com Associated Contact: karen@riversdesignhouse.com Associated Contact: Dan Schmidt schmidt@sathre.com Associated Contact: John Cadle jkcadle@gmail.com Interior remodeling, window, deck and siding replacement, shed dormer on Project Description: exisitng bonus room, new gable -roof covered front porch, new trusses (to create interior vault) of lower roof bedroom/bath west side of home Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application J Conditional Use Permit O Site Plan Application - Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception O Vacation Application O Variance Application O TOA https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitControIIer?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=86778363&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 John and Leslie Cadle have been long-time residents of Chanhassen who have wanted to be on Lake Minnetonka as they approach their retirement years. They sold their single-family home in Chanhassen two years ago and have been renting while they patiently looked for the "right" property of the lake. They are very excited about the property and home at 2691 Ethel Ave. on Casco Point and looking forward to living there and enjoying lake life once the home is renovated. The existing home was built in 1993 in a soft -contemporary, but now outdated style. They have plans to significantly remodel the interior and also wish to update the exterior with new windows, siding and roofing. In addition, they are hoping to re -work the front entry with a gabled roof cover, stone and cedar columns; replace the rotting deck including a minor re -design (squaring off the existing curved shape and relocating the steps); add a 13' wide shed dormer out lake side of bonus room roof to allow for windows and a view of the lake; re -work the driveway and sidewalk (the asphalt is in bad shape) and replace the roof trusses on the one-story side of the house (left side when facing) to allow a vaulted ceiling in the master bedroom. (The roof pitch would remains as is, but the plate height is raised from 8' to 9' to correspond with the adjacent eave line at the front entry.) We understand these exterior items require a variance as the property is considered non -conforming due to the unique and unusual circumstance of the neighboring "flag" lot which results in an extreme average setback. We feel all of these changes will only serve to enhance the property and neighborhood with no detrimental impact to the neighbors or area. The improvements will provide the Cadles with a renovated, updated home they can enjoy for years. Thank you for your consideration of this request to grant a variance so that the Cadles can improve their newly purchased home. 4/24/23, 4:34 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000021 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: In addition to the interior remodeling, siding, window and roof replacements, the following items are being proposed: 1. deck replacement with minor re -design (squaring off the existing curved shape and relocating the steps), 2. new entry and covered front stoop 3. 13' wide shed dormer out lake side of bonus room roof to allow for windows and a view of the lake 4. re -working the driveway and sidewalk 5. new roof trusses on the one-story side of the house (left side when facing) to allow a vaulted ceiling in the master bedroom. The roof pitch remains as is, but the plate height is raised from 8' to 9' to correspond with the adjacent eave line at the front entry. None of these improvements impact the view of the lake from the neighors' homes. (see photos). There are no additions planned, only improements to the existing structure footprint. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The unique circumstances created by the "flag -shaped" lot (2697 Ethel Ave.) to the right of and behind the Cadle property causes an extreme setback requirement. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: True. The new LP DiamondKote siding, Marvin windows, metal roof, maintenance -free decking and cable railing along with the cedar -colored accent shakes and use of stone on the columns at the entry are all congruent with the newer homes in the Casco Point area on Lake Minnetonka. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=86778363&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 4/24/23, 4:34 PM Permit List I Citizenserve dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The unique circumstances created by the "flag -shaped" lot to the right of the Cadle property causes an extreme setback. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: True, the neighboring "flag -shaped" lot with 10' of lakeshore which is part of the property for the home at 2697 Ethel Ave. behind this property creates the extreme setback situation. More common would be homes that are adjacent along the shoreline, creating a more normal setback average. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: True, the thirty year old home is out -dated inside and out. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: True 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: N/A https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PerrnitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=86778363&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 T FIELD CREW DM CL EJ DRAWN JPR CHECKED DLS DATE 4/13/23 NO. BY DATE FND � via EXISTING CONDITIONS I - m � 9 \ I so I 9 I �8 i I 10 O O I AVERAGE IR,� LAKESHORE EXISTING SETBACK HOUSE I10 6 I i I S89015'14"E 251.09 (MEAS.) �Zo \0 CP N 946.3 940.425 5 (PLAT) LAKE MINNETONKA I99 7 9 � _ 93 944 � 43- 9R2- 94 �40 3= ��� �9d i9� x 9 \3.4 /moi 1 ��P / 945.7-9� Eo _ CARMAN BAY -946- o n + N�\RB\\\ FID IP �'� \a s �. ,--------___ ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL = 929.4 (NGVD29) - g4-69- � S89 15 14 E 221 /-_ � - �.9 \�� 93 3 k � � � �-��� � ,�\ P - - 947- - 76,28- - - - -------EDGE OF WATER LOCATED APRIL 17TH, 2023 g�I I x94j3 0 - e _ =X98 \ 854809 0�- 88 829.76 j\��� 3389, 53.08 + �� +/ 31'/- _� 1 1 •94 � � 9 y / 948- / t 1 \ - _ 6��X \ \`' \ \ 1 �Q> o��o� p 9 BSBL� )�BSBL-BS�-BSEL-_B$BL-BSBL-BSBL-BSBL-BSBL-�9L-BSBL-B9$-BSBL-BSBL BBBL � X81 � \� l \ I I 932.0 �� i / �� �, q 61 x 950.8 �\ o o�b I / / // ti \9503 ` \ \Q� S / / \ 9 o 52.2 \ +\ \ \ \ \�\�\ 32.9-' 9SOS 28.N J \ \ \ / / W - / 07 toCD �C/ 954.7 x 0 1 I � x 955.6 I-+ �' •� a � o \ 510 2 BUILDING 8 \\ \ \ i l k 9S 955.4 x 95 HT- 27.3 ` \ \\ �\\ 931. x 19 J57 0 \\ 9S RET �� 8' WOE= \\ \ \ \'�(x� \ ` ° �O/p 9 955 " / / �6 WgLL �s6 952.6 �q \' \ \\ \ \ \ \ 9� , o _ �+ "956 0 9S\��,\ \\ \ X` c� 930.9 i „ 6 C\J 10/ �r 924"59.1 x 959.4 + V \ \957.0 gs,S�C \ \ \\ \���� \ \ \ \ \ 933 �� 957.0 0. �9- 962.6 L 9S \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ 3 19 I� \ 0 96 :� '� �� !3 \ \ X 93 934 `ND IP 2.. bu `'55.9 x/ ��b x �5+16 24 19S / O �5 . 9� g \ \ \ \\ 4.4 \�=J� �x CO / �g5aa ho 959.9 0960 8 I 9�� o>( 934- 934.4 t,) 959.9 xI +5g o ° �� : Z . \ \� \ .� \ EAST LINE OF TRACT C o o ° 36_ < RLS N0. 115 n 10`j \t / /p��\�� x 960.4 I I \ I v ° G 96/4 �6 C ,� 0' Ln 1 1 1 �6� V4 l \ CD �� g60.2 / �°�' C�EU 96 \ rA� 0 O 9O 960.4 x 1 /o 96/2 6 Q s� s 00 \0 9.47.6„ \ U • 9 Ln Q d 961 y,"1. GFE=10 �s o °' :.+ BUILDING 952.5 0i 1-26°�6.6 , 9 �\ �� �6� �� 96E7 HT= 30.1 ��GF- 1947.9611 \ '� �,'g X�STlN.C..,.;•.s��`. /HLT. 64 t'•;•"8 s w1'.' \ 2 961.5 ;':�' M•.N;Q•Uc.rL$j; 9s �u :, \ \� �� O.. WALL:' 1 X>1 \ \�s �'�� o o - g'61'o. 'QF?Iy .UVA..-.:� --: 960 yS�\ 1 � � \9 � � o � �\�� \ 3 \ .962.0 VE °':.:`.'..`;:,'..•.A ,g\ ` ` g ,.•r;.,`•,.''`\ o �� �� M 1 / a I 965. 64� \�\ ti O 9g 2 k I ;..::... . • 960.9 Y. \ \ Lo 86 x 960.5LQ � \ 5 O I S\ �':,:•.. N O 968/ '968 / \ \ 6 \ C. \ x 961.7 '&\ •..;... •; >....� x 967.8 ° \ _ \ � I O 9685 \ go \ �963.9 \ O 4. L6� \ t'". c° w (\� 992 \ � \ 9604 � • c� � � l` �/001D 9693 \ \ 85� A6�S /""::.r:...�9..• •..96Q.6`: '�t••�� Cil I O� L FBF \ \ \ \ >` \'`•. : rn ` �> 743 \ \ y�y\ymoo \9'"Dkl,V( WA1''• a /O < 4v� ��w9� 9 \ Cr / \ 6 80' L(v/� 962 \ \ . (\ 0 .'. " q) r EXISTING I L_ \� \ a HOUSE (�ST T. /p 962. EXISTING HOUSE T o' 961.8. :•,:•Ri' �'96.1� � / I LJ 2� S'"'\� 9)4 N 6/A 960./ T[) A A \ �O 960. F \ 96 /,0 \ 61.3 F 'v0 96Q3/p //2„ • 9ND 5'9 960 `; p 6508 0 6 928) 926) 930 5 0J /9 9.9 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 115, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said tract distant 15 feet Northwesterly from the most Southerly corner of said tract, through the Northeasterly comer of said tract. Together with an easement for right of way for road purposes over that part of Block 5, Winship's Subdivision of Lot Number One (1), Spring Park, 2nd Division, lying Southwesterly of the premises above described and between the Northerly extension of the Easterly line and the Westerly line of Ethel Avenue (now Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 115) and also together with the right to use of shore for private bathing and dock in front of a strip of land 15 feet in width, lying Southeasterly of and immediately adjacent to the Southeasterly line of the premises hereinabove first described, and which 15 foot strip runs Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said premises from the Easterly extension of the Southwesterly line of said premises to the shore of Carmen's Bay Lake Minnetonka; (now Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 115) STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 2691 Ethel Avenue, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO31 IF, effective date of November 4th 2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 33,836 f s.f - 0.777 f acres *we do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on the Lake Minnetonka Benchmark, Brass disk in concrete curb at the exit of Grays bay Dam area Benchmark elevation = 932.7 feet (NGVD 29). 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 30 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area (Tier 1) *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. CAST IRON MONUMENT REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCCTT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 19th day of April, 2023. �Fts so �� RL <�_ 20SAT H R E-BERGQUIST INC. • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cD-) POWER POLE AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION u' 7 T IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES GFE w 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 DRILL HOLE FOUND THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 schmidt@sathre.com N 4� PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 c� 4� WWW.SATHRE.COM FRS P 0P TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 115, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said tract distant 15 feet Northwesterly from the most Southerly corner of said tract, through the Northeasterly comer of said tract. Together with an easement for right of way for road purposes over that part of Block 5, Winship's Subdivision of Lot Number One (1), Spring Park, 2nd Division, lying Southwesterly of the premises above described and between the Northerly extension of the Easterly line and the Westerly line of Ethel Avenue (now Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 115) and also together with the right to use of shore for private bathing and dock in front of a strip of land 15 feet in width, lying Southeasterly of and immediately adjacent to the Southeasterly line of the premises hereinabove first described, and which 15 foot strip runs Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said premises from the Easterly extension of the Southwesterly line of said premises to the shore of Carmen's Bay Lake Minnetonka; (now Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 115) STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 2691 Ethel Avenue, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO31 IF, effective date of November 4th 2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 33,836 f s.f - 0.777 f acres *we do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on the Lake Minnetonka Benchmark, Brass disk in concrete curb at the exit of Grays bay Dam area Benchmark elevation = 932.7 feet (NGVD 29). 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 30 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area (Tier 1) *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT # PIEZOMETER WOE 1.1 'MINNET®NEA BEACH Pt. r • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cD-) POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE V DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X bPRQnU PARK a 5- - > '� Ls C LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. R_ i CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND T SANITARY MANHOLE p.. CONCRETE .,� �e 1aya�. aay REBAR MONUMENT FOUND N SANITARY CLEANOUT �� PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE "PI -1 P• BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV C PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC � Lt CATCH BASIN M CONCRETE CURB /� 4 A -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL E TREE DECIDUOUS \\ Lake Mtnneaonka j � -o- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND / H MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN TWP:117-RGE.2 20 Hennepin Countyunty CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY O RO N O 7 PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA HOME REFLECTIONS FILE NO. 37735-001 1 2 CAST IRON MONUMENT # PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cD-) POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET Ls LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND QS SANITARY MANHOLE p.. CONCRETE REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT BITUMINOUS PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV Q PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB SURVEY CONTROL POINT 4 FLARED END SECTION -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE QE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELG ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE ■ ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 0 YARD LIGHT Qu UTILITY MANHOLE GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE Q UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP Q WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE • WATER METER » STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP -0- WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FT FUEL TANK Q WELL RETAINING WALL PT PROPANE TANK MONITORING WELL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP I WATERMAIN j GAS VALVE M GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL • GAS MANHOLE HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATORFIR-21 IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Piv POST INDICATOR VALVE O- RAILROAD SWITCH 0 HAND HOLE SIGN (a SATELLITE DISH / H MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN TWP:117-RGE.2 20 Hennepin Countyunty CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY O RO N O 7 PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA HOME REFLECTIONS FILE NO. 37735-001 1 2 T F 9 ND /A 6 FIELD CREW DM CL EJ DRAWN JPR CHECKED DLS DATE 4/13/23 NO. BY 1 JPR DATE 4/20/2023 FND / DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED m PROPOSED CONDITIONS Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 115, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said tract distant 15 feet Northwesterly from the most Southerly corner of said tract, through the Northeasterly comer of said tract. Together with an easement for right of way for road purposes over that part of Block 5, Winship's Subdivision of Lot Number One (1), Spring Park, 2nd Division, lying Southwesterly of the premises above described and between the Northerly extension of the Easterly line and the Westerly line of Ethel Avenue (now Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 115) and also I \ together with the right to use of shore for private bathing and dock in front of a strip of land 15 feet in width, lying Southeasterly of and immediately adjacent to the \ Southeasterly line of the premises hereinabove first described, and which 15 foot strip runs Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said premises from the Easterly I \\ extension of the Southwesterly line of said premises to the shore of Carmen's Bay Lake Minnetonka; (now Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 115) 9 STANDARD NOTES 9�\ 1) Site Address: 2691 Ethel Avenue, Orono, Minnesota 55391 Io \ 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. I AVERAGE 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the LAKESHORE \ 1 -percent -annual -chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements EXISTING SETBACK \ \ and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO31IF, effective date of November 4th 2016. HOUSE 9�s \ 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 33,836 f s.f - 0.777 f acres I \\ *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description 5) Benchmark: Elevations are based on the Lake Minnetonka Benchmark, Brass disk in concrete curb at the exit of Grays bay Dam area Benchmark elevation = S890 15' 14"E 251.09 (MEAS.) ��� \��� 932.7 feet (NGVD 29). 251.5 (PLAT) ° �� LAKE MINNETONKA 946.3 940.4 x - 93 -93 / �'Q �/ �� 6) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map a x 943 7� X94 �9A _ 9 �3=\�\gyp ��, x 933.4 ��z 1�� dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: -- 1944 _ 3- 2- _ CARMAN BAY ��- W 945.7---94-,FD REo o N�R\B\\ \ �\ FVD IP �/2 1 i' ----- - -946- 946.9 S89 15'14"E 221+/--.9 ` \\� '93v k! v��� 05 \ ' ----- ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL = 929.4 (NGVD29) Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 30 feet o _ _947- _76.28- - - - X54.09 - - _ ------ EDGE OF WATER LOCATED APRIL 17TH, 2023 Side: lO feet °� '� x64?3 0 - X9 8 \ _ _o X32 6� \ \ �9 53.08 + -� 2 �7 /- + / 3 3 31 /- - Rear: 30 feet _� - _�� j \�NK �9/ Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) f 8--es�L-BSBL-BSBL-BSBL-BSB�L-�9L-SSBL-B9$- ¢��\ i �L-�L �L �L�o Height: 30 feet 932.0 0 3 g 1 l X0.8 \ \ \ �6\\ ` 1 x6, ` ` \ o\� Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area (Tier 1) \�b. 9 7.8 E \ \ \ \ Q \ 28.5 / 32.0 \ go 6 �� �q *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from 9C / the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. to CD 954.7 x � � o I X52 / x 955.6 O o i� 929.4 9 / \ �\ \ \ We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. k 955.4 x g5` . BTILDIN 3 L �p \ \ \��\\ \ \ � ( \ 931.1 x <' / ��� 9 \\�+ 9 I/ �95� / - \ 95S 6 �� �\ �\ \� �\ p�� �O iq qi �\ �9\���s 7) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject �,Fj� / / -9570 ._ 9 "A O \� \ \ �h O ° F property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the J g55 2 6 / / - / - \ \ 9s6 p� I 0 \ \ \\ \ i \�\ Igo ` / 416 , 9� � \ 19 mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may X + c? \ / s / 95 / / _ \ o T �'� \ \ 0 q k� 930.9 �2„ %off inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at c1q924"59. x 959.4 + \ 9 7 0 / _ \ \ O� O S\ \ 933 / �3 _ \ ��9\ least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. / v FFE P 3 \ 962.6 \O� \ �\\ FND IP I/2" 19 99 / J' O� s, O� \ S\\ �\ x 9--934 34-�\ \ �6 W 955.9 x/ /+ l O u 4 / / °�� a 8 x I6 96018 9S9 / 0 �� 20 \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\935 g`/ �` 959 9 ` tF�p `\ \ \ \�\\ \ _ \ EAST LINE OF TRACT C \ 1„D I / 959.9 x I + ` Z \k cr' \ YJ 1 ��-- \ rn l0 +y _r /' \ OG d' \ � 36 RLS N0. 115 \+ 9 o \I / � \�� x 960.4 r I 0 -P I i 1 1 \ °�°� \ \�\ \ �9t_�, 960.4x o 00 I \ \ fix/ \ GFE= 0 ,9 o \\ 7� 1/ O�j�Lj/�0��. o� ;r,'• ::a . GFE= BUILDING 952.5 fO o 26 947.6 6.6 �( 9Q�� ��\ g�0 X92 HT= 30.1 5�. h 947.1 3 \ \o 961.7 r� ro 3 4 ��/ 961.1 ��5, J6• `j•�~a:: -5 N y3s �� x o\� x�i \ �/� \ 930\ \ !� ', 9" ''X�STl1V.C..,.,•. 0 . RET. x`/` O �� 93 \961. ` \ 60, 11 • `' rJ \ 9 0 \ 0 \ '3 :.' .�> ', I IJM•.IN;Q•l�'..��� �' WALL •1 R V Ok 3 \ \� 62 X 961.5�`'� o . ' 4'R Y )!Vla: f,..:�_ 960�' .o / \` � , `� \ ^D \ / F P 3 cp 99 .962.0 a 6 i \ �...'961.1' .•.'•.,: OS� ` �/ \ �:" ¢ \ \� 960.Q9�OPON� / \ SQL / +\ ;'•.:y:' Z \ \ \ 966 9 \\ ;:...:. \. ':.. x 960.5 3.: ` `•:vy cP 68/ 968 / 967.8\\\\ \ \ \ O�SF�. � Ro / D / � ME OSS ,..•.,: ,: .� �: '� w 69 41 \ �l�iI � , . ,�, � • • . •Y •..... 9 0 5 cJ� Q� 00� F 9693 \ \ \ \ \5� \9s�� / \ ' 46i , ,.. ...'QUO 6`: 9 '�t.•'1: � � � O� C cn L ":T VIEW A \- /000 o Jam_ 962 6 �q) EXISTING I-) \ N I HOUSE \ 9\ . CURB ND /p (STOP EXISTING I 92 962.0 HOUSE T +; o' 961.8. :•,.••Fii' �'96.1'm9 � / :9fi 1.51 �:g 1-h .5Tn'9. / FND \ :. ';:t • . �.''; :,.:, 960.2 T[) A A 960. r_\ I I\/-\ u I .. •',:e•• ,:�?..:�,.: , •'.� F \ 96 /,0 \ 61.3 F 'v0 96Q3/p //2„ • 9ND 5'9 960 40 6508 REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/ORCT Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Fts SU AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS Y ��� RL STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 19th day of April, 2023. 20 SAT H R E-BERGQUIST INC. AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND u' 7 SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF T 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES w THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY N 4� PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 c� 4� WWW.SATHRE.COM RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. FRS P LP schmidt@sathre.com 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT # PIEZOMETER WOE lo- IMINNIETONKA BEACH / \ Pt • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cD-) POWER POLE �ry FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND I ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X ULII bPRQnU PAIBK Ls C LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND QS SANITARY MANHOLE p.. CONCRETE # REBAR MONUMENT FOUND N SANITARY CLEANOUT ;: BITUMINOUS L PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV S; C PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC �„� ,-'� III "1� CATCH BASIN M A a \.y,� 4 A -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so 1-t © CABLE TV PEDESTAL E TREE DECIDUOUS � _ \\ Lake Mtnneaonka j -o- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND / H MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN TWPA 17-RGE.23-SEC.20 Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY O RO N O 7 PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA HOME REFLECTIONS FILE NO. 37735-001 K 2 CAST IRON MONUMENT # PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cD-) POWER POLE FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET Ls LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND QS SANITARY MANHOLE p.. CONCRETE # REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT ;: BITUMINOUS L PK NAIL MONUMENT SET STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV Q PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB SURVEY CONTROL POINT 4 FLARED END SECTION -960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE QE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELG ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE ■ ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 0 YARD LIGHT QU UTILITY MANHOLE GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 91 UTILITY PEDESTAL 0HU OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE ❑v UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP Q WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE • WATER METER » STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP -0- WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FT FUEL TANK Q WELL RETAINING WALL PT PROPANE TANK MONITORING WELL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP I WATERMAIN j GAS VALVE M GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL • GAS MANHOLE HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS GENERATORFIR-21 IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Piv POST INDICATOR VALVE 0- RAILROAD SWITCH ❑H HAND HOLE SIGN (a SATELLITE DISH / H MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN TWPA 17-RGE.23-SEC.20 Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY O RO N O 7 PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA HOME REFLECTIONS FILE NO. 37735-001 K 2 q'-11 " J o F/P VENT I u NOTE: PROVIDE IN - FLOOR HEAT a@ ALL BASMENT BATHROOMS � m -v 12'-0" • NEW OUTDOOR 5HOWER WITH FR05T PROTECTION 2 2 3 Ab A4 Ab DECK TO BE REMOVED— _ ----- – :---------® -- -- T –� -- – –– – 31'-q"j F IT DECK 5 AIRS- VERIFY NUMBER D SIZE OF RINGERS REQ'D L •----�-- - ®i -- - - - -- I I� I • I � I • I � I REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT DECK FRAMING LAYOUT AND 51ZE5 I • I i 18'-0" _ a1 Ezz 12'-0" 25'-0" 38'-3" REMODEL PLANS FOR: JOHN & LESLIE CADLE 6-4" 20'-1 1/4" • woz �50FFIT FOR /P VENT -G- 0� OJT NOTE: ALL BAR CABINETS AND �f Goz APPLIANCE SIZES TO BE w > VERIFY HT. REQ'D W/ F/P �� b v m SUPPLIER �3 VERIFIED BY BUILDER PRIOR a G01 FAMILY TO ORDERING m u- N 2q' -b" X 13'-7" M r -W K G04 BEDROOM 2 INs'-q° GLC, & GHA-�- – – 1 1'- " X - N PATED T&G SLAT GLG.' N r r NEW F.F. DOORS TO ENCLOSE EXIST'G ELEC. PNL. FRAME IN N N BAR AREA; INSULATE 2691 ETHEL AVE. NAYZATA, MN 55391 I A 1 A"1 0 DECK TO BE REMOVED LI STAINED GLASS W/ BOXED m BACKLI6HTIN6, `fl I I I I Doa VERIFY SIZE REQUIREMENT5 I I I I I I I m m I I 006 I q' -b 3/4" 6'-3 1/4" 6-4 1/2" 14'-1" 2'-5"I '-6 1/2" HVAC, CHASE l -q" I I ABOVE FIN FLR. ------------------------------------- D03 I , D08 ' INFILL VyALL-MTD I REMOVE — — WINDOW — — STEP UP 1 R Cl1/2") F15HABOVE — — + — DOOR — I J vos HooKs --- I MOVE ONE —�— -r--I — —— —� vos---------NEW -- — ---- WATER SUPPLY 5-0" X 5'-2" vos BATH vos HVAC CHASE 7 DorOPENIN ---- EXI5T'G -2" LINE TO MAKE b'-11" X 5'-4" BATH ABOVE FIN FLR. I FURN. I I ROOM FOR NEW BGL5BA5EYV/ 4'-q" X b'-1" LOCATION I I DOOR SWING co3 cobLn i'-2" GLC. \TO FURNACE � o 4'-0"GLR. — — —— GoT0 ----- / / / l / 14'-5" X 14'-11 " NEW LEDGE Qa:T4'-4 WALLS ;b vos 2'-10 1/2'. b'-3" 1/2" aEPROOM II II i 1 T q" X 8'-10" m �L Im C vros E• I C------ 5AWGUT BLOCK FOR MAX AA" Fr QFGS WIN r,11 I _ i FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4" : 1'-O" CLOSET 3'-1 " X 4'-6" PORCH ABOVE 14'-8" X 5-10" WH ESTIMATED LOCATION --- --I r NEW FNDN WALL AND FOOTINGS AS SHOWN - REFER TO STRUCTURAL • I PLAN5 ' I I q-6 1/2"T 3� Ab LONER GARAGEI 2q'-2" X 37'-10" l'-11"GLG. I i L----------- -------- ------4--j --------------------- I--- 30'-5 1/2" 0 m p C� w v LL z � m w p w z Layout Pacie Table -abel Title 1 OUNDATION LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AND SCHEDULES 2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS ONUS ROOM FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN LEVATIONS LEVATIONS 6SECTIONS/ DETAILS ROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS 1 DTRUCTURAL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN 2 MAIN FLOOR FRAMING PLAN OW ROOF BONUS ROOM FLOOR FRAMING PLAN ONUS ROOM ROOF FRAMING PLAN STRUCTURAL DETAILS q'-11 " J o F/P VENT I u NOTE: PROVIDE IN - FLOOR HEAT a@ ALL BASMENT BATHROOMS � m -v 12'-0" • NEW OUTDOOR 5HOWER WITH FR05T PROTECTION 2 2 3 Ab A4 Ab DECK TO BE REMOVED— _ ----- – :---------® -- -- T –� -- – –– – 31'-q"j F IT DECK 5 AIRS- VERIFY NUMBER D SIZE OF RINGERS REQ'D L •----�-- - ®i -- - - - -- I I� I • I � I • I � I REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT DECK FRAMING LAYOUT AND 51ZE5 I • I i 18'-0" _ a1 Ezz 12'-0" 25'-0" 38'-3" REMODEL PLANS FOR: JOHN & LESLIE CADLE 6-4" 20'-1 1/4" • woz �50FFIT FOR /P VENT -G- 0� OJT NOTE: ALL BAR CABINETS AND �f Goz APPLIANCE SIZES TO BE w > VERIFY HT. REQ'D W/ F/P �� b v m SUPPLIER �3 VERIFIED BY BUILDER PRIOR a G01 FAMILY TO ORDERING m u- N 2q' -b" X 13'-7" M r -W K G04 BEDROOM 2 INs'-q° GLC, & GHA-�- – – 1 1'- " X - N PATED T&G SLAT GLG.' N r r NEW F.F. DOORS TO ENCLOSE EXIST'G ELEC. PNL. FRAME IN N N BAR AREA; INSULATE 2691 ETHEL AVE. NAYZATA, MN 55391 I A 1 A"1 0 DECK TO BE REMOVED LI STAINED GLASS W/ BOXED m BACKLI6HTIN6, `fl I I I I Doa VERIFY SIZE REQUIREMENT5 I I I I I I I m m I I 006 I q' -b 3/4" 6'-3 1/4" 6-4 1/2" 14'-1" 2'-5"I '-6 1/2" HVAC, CHASE l -q" I I ABOVE FIN FLR. ------------------------------------- D03 I , D08 ' INFILL VyALL-MTD I REMOVE — — WINDOW — — STEP UP 1 R Cl1/2") F15HABOVE — — + — DOOR — I J vos HooKs --- I MOVE ONE —�— -r--I — —— —� vos---------NEW -- — ---- WATER SUPPLY 5-0" X 5'-2" vos BATH vos HVAC CHASE 7 DorOPENIN ---- EXI5T'G -2" LINE TO MAKE b'-11" X 5'-4" BATH ABOVE FIN FLR. I FURN. I I ROOM FOR NEW BGL5BA5EYV/ 4'-q" X b'-1" LOCATION I I DOOR SWING co3 cobLn i'-2" GLC. \TO FURNACE � o 4'-0"GLR. — — —— GoT0 ----- / / / l / 14'-5" X 14'-11 " NEW LEDGE Qa:T4'-4 WALLS ;b vos 2'-10 1/2'. b'-3" 1/2" aEPROOM II II i 1 T q" X 8'-10" m �L Im C vros E• I C------ 5AWGUT BLOCK FOR MAX AA" Fr QFGS WIN r,11 I _ i FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4" : 1'-O" CLOSET 3'-1 " X 4'-6" PORCH ABOVE 14'-8" X 5-10" WH ESTIMATED LOCATION --- --I r NEW FNDN WALL AND FOOTINGS AS SHOWN - REFER TO STRUCTURAL • I PLAN5 ' I I q-6 1/2"T 3� Ab LONER GARAGEI 2q'-2" X 37'-10" l'-11"GLG. I i L----------- -------- ------4--j --------------------- I--- 30'-5 1/2" 0 m p C� w v LL z � m w p w z V C V w w w W �a O� v Lu m Z W < Z lli 2 1 j W W ~ p O 06 N w t� Z _ x x(y) U w =w wk ,t LLJ = N U z Q U w LL w w w LL N 0- Ln U Q Q J J LU OL Q O Q O Lu Q 1. lJi D W Q } 1L Lu �E w� � U Lo p Lu C, t� 2 :5 s ks)�Q�u- w`na)o LU o C, c� w 3 3 �r DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: Al 31 '-9" V DOOR SCHEDULE CABINET SCHEDULE WINDOW SCHEDULE FLOOR NUMBER QTY FLOOR WIDTH HEIGHT TOP EGRESS TEMPERED DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER COMMENTS W01 1 0 28 " 39 1/8 " 82" 1 SINGLE CASEMENT -HR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W02 1 0 72 " 55 1/8 " 82" 0 YES FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W03 1 0 72 " 59 1/8 " 82" YES DOUBLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W04 1 0 72 " 43 1/8 " 82" YES DOUBLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W05 1 10 56 " 43 1/8" 82" EXT. HINGED -SLAB DOUBLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W06 3 1 24 " 23 1/8 " 96" 36 " FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W07 1 1 32 " 47 1/8 " 82" CUSTOM HEIGHT DOOR TO MATCH ADJ DOOR FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W08 1 1 84 " 55 1/8 " 96" YES TRIPLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W09 1 1 32 " 47 1/8 " 96" YES SINGLE CASEMENT -HR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W10 1 1 56 " 47 1/8 " 96" YES DOUBLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W11 1 11 56 " 63 1/8" 155 1/4" 84 " FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W12 2 1 36 " 47 1/8 " 139 1/4" HINGED -SLAB FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W13 1 1 72 " 23 1/8 " 106" 18 " FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W14 1 1 96 " 40 " 82" 96 " FIXED GLASS MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS MUST FIT ELEC OUTLETS UNDER W15 1 2 64 " 55 1/8 " 82" YES DOUBLE CASEMENT-LHL/RHR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W16 1 2 36 " 47 1/8 " 66" YES SINGLE CASEMENT -HL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS W17 1 2 36 " 47 1/8 " 66" YES SINGLE CASEMENT -HR MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS 31 '-9" DEC 10'-0" X 15'-11" ALL NEW DECK AND STAIRS 0 r 12'-0" b'-10" 5-2" 4'-1 1/2" F/P VENT ABOVE MASTER UP 13'-4 1/2" 3 A4 12-0" 4'-b" 38'-3" NOTE: VERIFY NUMBER OF RISERS REQ'D TO MEET GRADE UP V DOOR SCHEDULE CABINET SCHEDULE NUMBER QTY FLOOR WIDTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER COMMENTS D01 1 0 30 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 42 " BASE CABINET D02 1 0 29 1/16 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 42 " BASE CABINET D03 1 0 30 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 40 1/2 " NEW DOOR IN EXIST'G OPENING D04 1 0 144 " 96 " GARAGE -SLAB 42 " BASE CABINET D05 5 0 30 " 80 " POCKET -SLAB 36 " WALL CABINET D06 1 0 36 " 80 " EXT. HINGED -SLAB 901, NEW DOOR IN EXIST'G OPENING D07 1 0 36 " 76 " HINGED -SLAB 36 " VERIFY AVAILABLE HEIGHT D08 1 0 30 " 901, HINGED -SLAB 36 " CUSTOM HEIGHT DOOR TO MATCH ADJ DOOR D09 1 0 71 " 79 1/2 " EXT. SLIDER -GLASS PANEL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS NEW DOOR IN EXIST'G OPENING D10 1 0 36 " 80 " EXT. HINGED -GLASS PANEL 12 " 66 " D11 2 1 28 " 96 " HINGED -SLAB 24 " 36 " D12 1 1 108 " 84 " GARAGE -SLAB 24 " 36 " D13 1 1 192 " 84 " GARAGE -SLAB 24 " 36 " D14 1 1 28 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 12 " 66 " D15 1 1 30 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 18 " 18 " D16 1 1 30 " 80 " POCKET -SLAB 24 " 96 " D17 1 1 71 " 79 1/2 " SLIDER -GLASS PANEL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS 36 " D18 1 1 32 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 24 " 24 " D19 2 1 24 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 39 " 36 " D20 1 1 96 1/2 " 79 1/2" EXT. TRIPLE SLIDER -GLASS PANEL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS 3 -PANEL D21 1 1 30 " 80 " BARN -SLAB 42 " 12 " D22 1 1 32 " 80 " POCKET -SLAB 12 " 24 " D23 1 1 60 5/8 " 86 " EXT. DOUBLE HINGED -AT -GLASS PANEL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS 15 " D24 1 1 36 " 80 " BARN -SLAB 23 " 24 " D25 1 1 36 " 80 " EXT. HINGED -DOOR E01 36 " 24 " D26 1 1 36 " 80 " POCKET -SLAB 121" 24 " D27 1 1 141 " 79 1/2 " QUAD SLIDER -GLASS PANEL MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS 12 " D28 1 1 30 " 80 " SHOWER -GLASS SLAB 18 " MASTER BATH GLASS SHOWER DOOR D29 1 2 30 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 12 1/16 " 12 " D30 1 2 32 " 80 " HINGED -SLAB 39 " 15 " D31 1 1 36 " 80 " EXT. HINGED -SLAB 36 " 121" DEC 10'-0" X 15'-11" ALL NEW DECK AND STAIRS 0 r 12'-0" b'-10" 5-2" 4'-1 1/2" F/P VENT ABOVE MASTER UP 13'-4 1/2" 3 A4 12-0" 4'-b" 38'-3" NOTE: VERIFY NUMBER OF RISERS REQ'D TO MEET GRADE UP 4 Ab 1 Al 9'-l3/4" 12'-13/4" E b'-21/2" REMOVE KITCHEN NEW NAL OF BONUS NINDON BUMP -OUT N114 ROOM ABOVE D20 GOO G18 1-IEL ON G29 BEDROOM ROOF o > Boos ® ® TF TRA5H REMIYE DO/"JR & WIND W-- W12 W12 , 0 Z G22 G12 Dw Gob G09 (�19 G28 12'-1 1/4" o wob E - = Dz7 - - - o w13 � GO KTOP ND KITGHENI vE T Hoo ® ---_CASED -AM - - - - -- D17 13'-5"X12'-1 m" o 1'-b" cls 1'-b" I HOOD 8'-0" GLC. I c1Bl NALL I �F1 NI HE _ w DEMOI I -, I _ " X - MASTER J FP i G24 G24 G24 I G 26 m I YJ' -0" GLC. BEDROOM _ _ _ _ _ - — — — — — CARPET - lfl .O r 12'-10" X 18'-8" ABED BEAM L I_ _ G30 w : I I N 1 _ nn - -1 , EXI5 'G LINE F BONUS ROOM BOVI VAULTED C — — I w _ ABOVE- 16" SNACK LEDGE- OPEN BELOW 26 U 15'-10" X 12'-11" OPEN 10'0 GLG - - _GA5E2 EARL - - - - - - z Lu EXI5T'G ,' WOOD PAINTED SHIPLAP GLG. II - � wob CARPET J 1. b.. wDE 15'-1 1/2" 4 -7 1/4"" b'-0" 3'-1 1/4" b'-4 3/4" 1'-2" T� 2'-9" 6-3 1/2" 3'-0 3/4' IVIN WOOD Q z NOO END5:ON STAIRS. VERIFY I m cv :o d w ' ---- - - - -- - - _ - - __ v� X 9'- -� �A_SE_D$E --------- -- — ----- z W v I Z i GARP T RUNNER. - - D2, L ULT -- -. UP 8._DEMO GLG.I ROOF/ LOFT `n PAINTED SHIPLAP GLC. V I ON EXISTNT Y GLSTaZ Q EW RAILING --u,CLST ABOVE. DEMO 8 WALL5. \ X a_ w __ wob BUILD NEN 9' WALLS < - EAR - - - - _ _ i STAIRS OFPEE B R c16 - WOOD \ @ � _ _ GASE_D BEAM � I _ MASTER BEDROOM WING. >% a- 0� i G11 62�6 ' WALL OVEN I � NOTE: 2' IN FRONT D24 & Miw- q0 o �Y�1ALL w GBoi OF TOILET REQ'D N NICHE - - > B T C20c10 tu 54" CASED B�AM _ — p D14 w X - Mu ROOM w = INFILL PREVIOUS SHWRI„ _ � TILE 5 fit' X 8'--r v -� I ALCOVE IN - = - o -�— ILE 3'-4" GLR. „ G30 10'-0" GLG. G, G,4w -m I GARAGE SHWR. GONTROL5 II - - - _ - V_ RULTED - — _ _ �________GASEDI_BEAM______�' _ nN GYP. BD. UNDERSIDE OF N D28 FLAT Dia NEN CHANGE IN GLG. ELEV. / Z STAIRS & LAN DING ABOVE b'-1 b'-0 1 /4" / GL5 II I IL C,7 � NT Y / / MAT n' q'-0" GLC. 10'4" X 1 1'-10" / / / `�' DB1 B T HOOD / P GLG. 30X22 I ° CLOSET DEMO HALF N is LL, 10'-0" GLC. TILE ATTIC PROVIDE 1EW / D22 _ ACCESS TILE CURVED RAI INC_ V-3 1/2" 2'-41/2'.D4TI I Nin TILE � �� � I I ll l'-1 " X 3'-0" D„ D1l P40`1 E- cv I J L ARG ED 1 Fl D2-3 b'-0" w 5'-4" 5'-4" mPORCH m N1" X 6'-5" Ln w I v I VAULTED I� I I S I CASED BEAM !N/ 14 GFN- SEE ELEV5� 12'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4": 1 '-0" v I — — — — EXIST'G LINE OF BONUS ROOM ABOVE, TO REMAIN LAUNDS GARAGE 29'-6" X 22'-6" Q `f' 10'-0" GLG. � � 4'-8 /4" 4'-9 1/4" FOLDIN� CTF. Qa 41T..I--- I b m OE I I EN � � O ENING 4'-q" 4'-q" 2 3 3 Ab A4 Ab D12 0 r lz m I V CABINET SCHEDULE NUMBER QTY FLOOR WIDTH DEPTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTION COMMENTS C01 1 0 18 " 24 " 42 " BASE CABINET BAR PREP SINK CO2 1 0 24 " 24 " 42 " BASE CABINET BAR MICROWAVE CABINET CO3 1 0 36 " 20 " 40 1/2 " BASE CABINET VANITY SINK BASE, CUSTOM HEIGHT TO LINE UP WITH WALL LEDGE HEIGHT C04 1 0 24 " 24 " 42 " BASE CABINET BAR UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR C05 2 0 12 " 12 " 36 " WALL CABINET BAR WALL CABINETS C06 1 0 24 " 24 " 901, UTILITY CABINET LINENS C07 1 0 30 " 20 " 36 " BASE CABINET VANITY SINK BASE C08 1 1 36 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET m C09 1 1 18 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET TRASH PULL-OUT C10 1 1 25 1/2" 12 " 66 " WALL CABINET LOCKERS C11 1 1 21 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET COFFEE BAR BASE CAB WITH PREP SINK C12 1 1 18 3/4 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET C13 1 1 30 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET GAS COOKTOP C14 1 1 27 " 12 " 66 " WALL CABINET LOCKERS C15 1 1 27 " 18 " 18 " BASE CABINET LOCKERS C16 1 1 30 " 24 " 96 " UTILITY CABINET C17 2 1 34 1/2 " 21 " 36 " BASE CABINET MASTER BATH VANITY BASE- VERIFY WIDTH C18 1 1 37 " 24 " 24 " WALL CABINET C19 1 1 36 " 39 " 36 " CORNER BASE CABINET C20 1 1 25 1/2 " 18 " 18 " BASE CABINET LOCKERS C21 1 1 42 " 12 " 42 " WALL CABINET C22 1 1 12 " 24 " 94 " UTILITY CABINET C23 1 1 38 1/16 " 15 " 36 " BASE CABINET FIREPLACE BUILT-INS C24 4 1 23 " 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET C25 1 1 36 " 24 " 141" BASE CABINET LAUNDRY SINK BASE- CUSTOM HEIGHT C26 3 1 121" 24 " 36 " BASE CABINET C27 1 1 33 " 12 " 42 " WALL CABINET C28 1 1 18 " 12 " 42 " WALL CABINET C29 1 1 12 1/16 " 12 " 42 " WALL CABINET FILLER CORNER SPACER- NO STORAGE C30 3 1 39 " 15 " 36 " BASE CABINET FIREPLACE BUILT-INS C31 1 2 36 " 121" 36 " BASE CABINET C32 1 12 127" 124" 157" 1 UTILITY CABINET FACE FRAME CAB BUILT IN DEAD SPACE 4 Ab 1 Al 9'-l3/4" 12'-13/4" E b'-21/2" REMOVE KITCHEN NEW NAL OF BONUS NINDON BUMP -OUT N114 ROOM ABOVE D20 GOO G18 1-IEL ON G29 BEDROOM ROOF o > Boos ® ® TF TRA5H REMIYE DO/"JR & WIND W-- W12 W12 , 0 Z G22 G12 Dw Gob G09 (�19 G28 12'-1 1/4" o wob E - = Dz7 - - - o w13 � GO KTOP ND KITGHENI vE T Hoo ® ---_CASED -AM - - - - -- D17 13'-5"X12'-1 m" o 1'-b" cls 1'-b" I HOOD 8'-0" GLC. I c1Bl NALL I �F1 NI HE _ w DEMOI I -, I _ " X - MASTER J FP i G24 G24 G24 I G 26 m I YJ' -0" GLC. BEDROOM _ _ _ _ _ - — — — — — CARPET - lfl .O r 12'-10" X 18'-8" ABED BEAM L I_ _ G30 w : I I N 1 _ nn - -1 , EXI5 'G LINE F BONUS ROOM BOVI VAULTED C — — I w _ ABOVE- 16" SNACK LEDGE- OPEN BELOW 26 U 15'-10" X 12'-11" OPEN 10'0 GLG - - _GA5E2 EARL - - - - - - z Lu EXI5T'G ,' WOOD PAINTED SHIPLAP GLG. II - � wob CARPET J 1. b.. wDE 15'-1 1/2" 4 -7 1/4"" b'-0" 3'-1 1/4" b'-4 3/4" 1'-2" T� 2'-9" 6-3 1/2" 3'-0 3/4' IVIN WOOD Q z NOO END5:ON STAIRS. VERIFY I m cv :o d w ' ---- - - - -- - - _ - - __ v� X 9'- -� �A_SE_D$E --------- -- — ----- z W v I Z i GARP T RUNNER. - - D2, L ULT -- -. UP 8._DEMO GLG.I ROOF/ LOFT `n PAINTED SHIPLAP GLC. V I ON EXISTNT Y GLSTaZ Q EW RAILING --u,CLST ABOVE. DEMO 8 WALL5. \ X a_ w __ wob BUILD NEN 9' WALLS < - EAR - - - - _ _ i STAIRS OFPEE B R c16 - WOOD \ @ � _ _ GASE_D BEAM � I _ MASTER BEDROOM WING. >% a- 0� i G11 62�6 ' WALL OVEN I � NOTE: 2' IN FRONT D24 & Miw- q0 o �Y�1ALL w GBoi OF TOILET REQ'D N NICHE - - > B T C20c10 tu 54" CASED B�AM _ — p D14 w X - Mu ROOM w = INFILL PREVIOUS SHWRI„ _ � TILE 5 fit' X 8'--r v -� I ALCOVE IN - = - o -�— ILE 3'-4" GLR. „ G30 10'-0" GLG. G, G,4w -m I GARAGE SHWR. GONTROL5 II - - - _ - V_ RULTED - — _ _ �________GASEDI_BEAM______�' _ nN GYP. BD. UNDERSIDE OF N D28 FLAT Dia NEN CHANGE IN GLG. ELEV. / Z STAIRS & LAN DING ABOVE b'-1 b'-0 1 /4" / GL5 II I IL C,7 � NT Y / / MAT n' q'-0" GLC. 10'4" X 1 1'-10" / / / `�' DB1 B T HOOD / P GLG. 30X22 I ° CLOSET DEMO HALF N is LL, 10'-0" GLC. TILE ATTIC PROVIDE 1EW / D22 _ ACCESS TILE CURVED RAI INC_ V-3 1/2" 2'-41/2'.D4TI I Nin TILE � �� � I I ll l'-1 " X 3'-0" D„ D1l P40`1 E- cv I J L ARG ED 1 Fl D2-3 b'-0" w 5'-4" 5'-4" mPORCH m N1" X 6'-5" Ln w I v I VAULTED I� I I S I CASED BEAM !N/ 14 GFN- SEE ELEV5� 12'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4": 1 '-0" v I — — — — EXIST'G LINE OF BONUS ROOM ABOVE, TO REMAIN LAUNDS GARAGE 29'-6" X 22'-6" Q `f' 10'-0" GLG. � � 4'-8 /4" 4'-9 1/4" FOLDIN� CTF. Qa 41T..I--- I b m OE I I EN � � O ENING 4'-q" 4'-q" 2 3 3 Ab A4 Ab D12 0 r lz m I V I� O V W F-�-I W W W �a O� v Lu m Z W Z Lu 1 j W W ~ Q O 06 N Lu t� Z _ X XV iii = Lu ry LU N Lu _ N :2 z J 0 Q v w Ln U LL w w_ w J LL � rDv d V) U ca t1l J } IL W Lu 0 l.L � Z Lu �Z V E L � O U N n Lu C, O = :5 s ks) W Q L W C, c� W 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: A2 REMOVE SOFFIT AND GUT 5MALL NOTE: REMOVE ALL EX15T'G SOFFIT VENT'G TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE AIR FLOW TO RIDGE VENT'G NEW DORMER WITH 2.5 / 12 SHED ROOF- REMOVE EX15T'G ROOF STRUCTURE @ NEW DORMER AREA ROOF PLAN 1/4" : 1'-0" 101-03/51, VERIFY T-6 1/2" VERIFY 4 A6 30'-5 l/5" 5'-2" 1 3'-11" w1� E E 6-6" ITop Plate Height- ve ------------------------ LINE OF WALL BELOWLU I O WALL TO LINE UP WITH J N EX15T'G CEILING OPENING; VERIFY PLACEMENT FORMER XTENT5 OF BONU5 R M — F7- LU D FBGLS ruB I S RT 5 T e Height tub W/ T LED LLS LU LU BONUS RM L . F-1 'n ��+ 8' GLC. U.N. I� XIST'G R.I. O. I � �— — — -F6 RMER EXTENTS OF FL T GLC. - --- BATH 4'-11/5"- G31 X 25-10" — - I I I I I � iv II I 30X22 — — — — EXIST'G 5TAIRWELL AND Dao o ATTIC UL LANDING TO REMAIN ACCE s O 6'-4" Top Plate Height- verify I I I I I I I I � I a� 4'-5 3/4" 21'-4 1/4'' Z w L - - -- I- � � I L LINE OF NALL BELOW - I I I I 2 BONUS ROOM FLOOR PLAN ; LLINE OFWALLBELOW 1/4": 1'-0" I B V O V W W w W W O LU �a O� v LU m z LU in Z tJ 2 LU LLI w Q O 06 ry N LU t� Z _ X V iii = LU w = z Q U F-- w F- � LL w w_ w LL N d L/1 U z J Z O � LL LL Q) NQ)N 1� Q Z z E LU � O U n w Ca O = � s W 0) A o L W W C, 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: A3 C �/IGTI/ O/1 /1C lml'rl1 MClm FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" : V-0" REAR (LAKE SIDE) ELEVATION 1/4" : V-0" V7 �II71 1� O V W W w W W O LU �a O� v Lu m z Lu < in z o 13 2 w LUw O 06 ry LU t� Z _ X V LU = N LU N �_ w = N U z J F-- Q w v 7) F LL w w_ w LL N d Ln U V z O V— LU ' '' LU E LdN p LU C, = :5 0 ks) WLU O co LU C, c� LU 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: A4 f1cAAn cVIGT�/_ annc /a- of Arc 51DE ELEVATION 1/4" : 1'-0" 5 1/4" : l'—O" V 71 1� O V W W w W W O LU �a O� v Lu m z Lu < in z tJ 2 w LUw O 06 ry LU t� Z _ X V LU N LU LU N w= N U z J o Q v U 7 w LL w w_ w LL N d l/1 U kV / z O V— LU ' '' LU E LdN p LU C, = :5 s ks) WLU O co LU C, c� LU 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: A5 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF FASTENED PER MANUFACTURER'S 5PEC-5 ON 15# FELT ON 1/16" 05B ON MANUFACTURED ROOFTRU55 PER TRU55 DESIGNER INSULATION BAFFLES @ VENTS, TYP. ALUM. SOFFIT AND FASCIA W/ BLOCKING & VENT'G A5 REQ'D ATTIC VENT'G MIN 1 FT/ 300 S.F. ATTIC AREA W/ HALF OF THE VENTS @ RIDGE MIN R-49 INSULATION IN CI -6. CASED BEAM- VERIFY WITH BUILDER W/ WOOD SLATS ON On VAULTED CEILING w ------------- ------ ---------OL -------- - - - - - - �PREVIOUS 5' PLATE HEIGHT 0 X _ O W/G MASTER MASTER BEDROOM BATH < EXI5T'G FLOOR JOISTS TO REMAIN BEDROOM 3 5AWGUT EX15T'6 CMU BATH m TO MAX. 44" N EGRE55 �— SILL I EX15T'6 HVAC CHA5E TO REMAIN E 15T'6 FLOOR JOISTS TO REMAIN 0 F/P VENT CHASE BEDROOM 2 v m ALL EX15T'6 SLABS/ FNDN/ FTG5 TO REMAIN 4 � 4 4 GR055 SECTION THRU MA5TER BEDROOM 1/4" : l'—O" PROVIDE NEW MASTER BEDROOM WALL5 AT 9' PLATE HEIGHT. DEMO OLD WALL5. GABLE RAIL- VERIFY WITH BUILDER DECK DECK STRUCTURE PER ENG'R PLANS I I I I I I I I L - J j 3 `GR055 SECTION THRU LAUNDRY ROOM 1/4" : 1'-0" EX15T'6 ROOF TRUSSES TO REMAIN NEW FRAMED DOWN 10'-0" CLG @ FRONT ENTRY AND 5TAIRWELL ENTRANCE COVERED ,T D PORCH �a 4 a NEW FR05T FTG. PER ENG'R �4 4 a 4 1 q -J u���J LIVING ROOM C===] FIREPLAG \ LJLl \ Zltl 1, NEW DOOR p , k\ \ MEGH. \ ROOM � Do -r GR055 5ECTION THRU FRONT ENTRY 1/4" : 1'-0" oinl- m M=&" OCo CAI/ --o 0 0 FAMILY ROOM D03 � REPLAG i" 4 ' GR055 SECTION THRU KITCHEN &DORMER 1/4" : 1'-0" V z 0 V W F-�-1 w W 0 Lu Q � 2L v iLi m Z W < Ul Z lu2 W W W 17- < Ll O N W z 2 O X X w =w w J (v *k ~ t LUV N = N U Z W V - w 0 < Lu W W u- N d 111 V V I W Q V z 0 Q Lu J E � LLI � � O U N W p = O s Z a.- > LUW LU cLo , -0 o CO L - Z W u ,� t C, c��, W 3m El DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: A6 LONER LEVEL ELEVATIONS MASTER BATH ELEVATION TO 5TAIRWELL BEYOND MUDROOM ELEVATION CASED BEAMS LIVING ROOM ELEVATIONS CASED BEAMS MASTER BEDROOM ELEVATION LAUNDRY ROOM ELEVATION VERIFY SHELF AND BUILT-IN PLACEMENT WITH CABINET SUPPLIER VERIFY STONE VENEER SELECTION BONUS ROOM ELEVATIONS KITCHEN ELEVATIONS Mi �►50 .� 00 CROSS SECTION THRU BONUS ROOM & GARAGE5 1/4": 1 '-0" u 2D SYMBOL O FEJ I 1 l lO ® BRICK -4, NEW ® I�OCI� ODU SIDING -6, NEW 000 z INTERIOR -6, NEW C TY ® O GLASS SHOWER, NEW GAS F/P r--� m W L _ _ J Z W ZLJO INTERIOR-4,EXIST'G (MAY HAVE FNDN. ) O SIDING -6, EXIST'G (MAY HAVE FNDN. ) ® L --J 12" CONCRETE STEM WALL L_= J 8" CMU (BLOCK) STEM WALL, EXIST'G LIVING ROOM ELEVATIONS CASED BEAMS MASTER BEDROOM ELEVATION LAUNDRY ROOM ELEVATION VERIFY SHELF AND BUILT-IN PLACEMENT WITH CABINET SUPPLIER VERIFY STONE VENEER SELECTION BONUS ROOM ELEVATIONS KITCHEN ELEVATIONS Mi �►50 .� 00 CROSS SECTION THRU BONUS ROOM & GARAGE5 1/4": 1 '-0" u 2D SYMBOL WALL TYPE - ® BRICK -4, NEW ® C� SIDING -6, NEW 000 z INTERIOR -6, NEW C PIPE EN05 MIN. 12" J1 ABOVE ROOF SURFACE AND MIN 10'-0" FROM WINDOW5, OPENINGS, OR OTHER BUILDINGS VENT PIPE T -FITTING VENT PIPE TO HORIZ. PIPE -d" c�aF. PPE_ .-.loin HORIZ. UNDER Y.B. IN AGGREGATE TYPICAL RADON DETAIL NOT TO 5GALE HANDRAIL 10" IN. TREAD ` w � v � \ � 4 TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL NOT TO 5GALE FLASH AROUND PIPE VENT PIPE RUNS VERTICALLY THRU THE BLDG. LABEL PIPE A5 "RADON REDUCTION SYSTEM" @ EA. FLOOR 6 MIL POLY SHEETING OVER AGGREGATE, LAPPED 12" @ SEAMS, FIT CLOSELY AROUND PENETRATIONS AGGREGATE DIA < 2") UNDER CONC. SLABS 1. MIN 6'-8" HEADROOM MEASURED FROM DIAGONAL OF STAIR N051 NG5. 2. MAINTAIN MIN 36" WIDTH AT HALLWAY5 AND 5TAI RWAY5. 3. PROVIDE MIN ONE CONTINUOUS, GRIPPABLE HANDRAIL AT STAIRS, W/ EN05 RETURNING TO WALL OR POST. HANDRAIL TO BE 34"-38" HIGH, 1-1/4" DIA, AND NO CL05ER THAN 1-1 /2" TO WALL. 4. GUARDRAILS MIN 36" HIGH W/ MAX 4" OPENING. WALL SCHEDULE 2D SYMBOL WALL TYPE INTERIOR -4, NEW ® BRICK -4, NEW ® C� SIDING -6, NEW z INTERIOR -6, NEW C INTERIOR RAILING ® DECK RAILING/FENCE GLASS SHOWER, NEW ® r--� 8" CONCRETE STEM WALL W L _ _ J INTERIOR -6, EXIST'G (MAY HAVE FNDN. ) W L-_ J INTERIOR-4,EXIST'G (MAY HAVE FNDN. ) w SIDING -6, EXIST'G (MAY HAVE FNDN. ) ® L --J 12" CONCRETE STEM WALL L_= J 8" CMU (BLOCK) STEM WALL, EXIST'G CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND SCOPE OF WORK: 1. PROVIDE BONUS ROOM ABOVE GARAGE- VERIFY STRUCTURAL PLANS AND TRU55 DESIGN. 2. INTERIOR WALL5 TO BE 4" 5TUD5 WITH GYP BOTH SIDES, TYP. EXTERIOR WALL5 AND INTERIOR BEARING WALL5 TO BE 6" 5TUD5 WITH GYP INTERIOR AND SIDING EXTERIOR, TYP. 3. PROVIDE RADON VENT'G AT SEALED SUMP BASKET, THROUGH ROOF. PROVIDE ONE ELEC OUTLET IN ATTIC NEAR RADON VENT EXIT, PER CODE. 4. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL ONE 51DE OF STAIR, 34-38" ABOVE STAIR NOSING, A5 REQ'D. 5. PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTOR IN ALL BDRM5 AND HALLWAY LEADING TO BDRM(5), AND ONE EACH FLOOR LEVEL A5 REQ'D BY CODE. 6. PROVIDE 1/2" GYP. BD. ON WALL BETWEEN GARAGE AND HOUSE, ON ALL GARAGE WALL5 SUPPORTING BONUS ROOM, ON GARAGE CEILING BELOW BONUS ROOM, AND ON UNDER51DE OF STAIR BUMP OUT IN GARAGE. 1. PROVIDE ONE E6RE55 WINDOW EACH BEDROOM AND AT LEAST ONE EACH FLOOR LEVEL. 8. PROVIDE BLK'G IN WALL5 AT STAIR HANDRAIL, OL05ET SHELVING, TOWEL RODS, ETC. 9. PROVIDE FLASHING AT WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF A5 REQ'D. 10. PROVIDE FIRE BLOCKING IN STUD CAVITIES FOR ANY WALL5 OVER 10' IN HEIGHT. 11. PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS AT ANY WINDOW REQUIRING IT PER CODE. 12. HEADERS, POSTS, AND BEAMS AS SPECIFIED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 13. ALL ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT MANUFACTURER INFORMATION/ SPECS/ DRAWIN65/ PLANS/ NOTES SUPERSEDE THESE PLANS. V C� z C V W W w W W W Q � o%JwLn Z W Z (n lu 2 JLu W QLu O06 u— N N W fY Z 0 X X V Lu =LU w J *k _ N U Z Lu V 110 U - O FA < w LL w ui J LL Corq d 111 V Q 7— tf) �x v� ww 0) (:!k lsi lti 0 v J E � LLI � � O U N W p = O s Z a. -W LU Q -0 o L Z W ,- t W 3m DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: Al @) li� r- — r- — T �OOTING & FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1 °-O" STKIF ATG= DEEP 57(ZIP FOOTIAJG W t7'H i 2- #-q Co.U7I.II)CO5, UOLF55 AIoTED 6 rN I�tc�IsE .05-T : g," (,WC I-t~TE WA[ L w I -T H VER-rj I-WoVr- b ownz AT Til' IAI WALL ? #u Ifo,71-7 A7 ��°O.C.��NI E55 MTED oi,tiawt5F. FOOTING SCHEDULE MARK SIZE REINFORCEMENT P1 14"0 CONC PIER 2- #4 VERT P2 14"0 COiNC PIER 2- #4 VERT P3" 16"0 CONIC PIER 2- #4 VERT PIER MAYBE SUBSTITUTED WITH 14"0 CONCRETE PIER Wf 2- 94 VERTS & 22"x22" (SF -22) SQUARE FOOT BASE. V O V W W w W W O Lu �a O� v LU m Z LUz in tJ d 2 I Lu Luw Q O 06 ry N Lu Z X x V Lu � = Lu N N LLJ_ w = N U z J (] Q v F-- w 7) F LL w w_ w LL N d Ln U kD Z z OL O z O O LL N� �Z D vo LL t� Q Z tf E � LdO l(1 N 0 Lu C, Q = :5 s � Lu � L Q o L u- kD W w C, 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: 51 �Y '1 - ?If % TO T'ra MAIN FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = l' -O" ftY,ci T-fl6: "ZIl " 4^DtiQTIE NOPSE9 £,F &ROUT r�o5TW b FIZ5(A5T PLANK; EA1J>S AT VW04 F-1009 So's-r 5FACE SooP AT 7 o+F /Jo(ZE 5L VETA IJ- 4/S5 r4IZ 13v1LT- UP CoW.M Al F5ViAJb 5Tub5 � PSL c-DIVA,u5 AgOVF. 6C6vr t-x'STWb fA5TMA)b RC&vlMgEArFS. (140 CVFZC: 3 CCUOE-� Rf LOW SUAC-106. s° V O V W W w W W O U �a O� v Lu m zLU�z in tJ 2 LU LU w Q O 06 ry N W z O X V w LU J N F --N N �_ w = 0:� z w Q v kD w O 7 F- LL w w_ J LL 1.0 N 0� d _ _ Ln u kD z N� i� z NL iF O O IL LL z �E Ld0 0 LU 0 0� = s W 0) Q73 qao L LU w C, c� 3 3 � DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: 52 LOW ROOF / BONUS ROOM FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" 2- 5 112 LVL MARK5 T*WS= "Z/I "lPJD1CA'rF AJt tAWL Ur VQoF, S"15"AFA "ILI> 5tf"l-b b WITH 141 NAIL SEE DETAIL 4/S5 FOR BUILT-UP COLUMN 13EARN06A)i7 Wt,5- III HIMO-WN AT b" D.I- PAVC-L E'�6E �` �I`' c. FeLI� - FASTENING REQUIREMENTS �mCSL ri0oK 10157 SPA(C SOLD AT Z Olt FtOAE' � Dr igb sans 4 KI cotuMAJS A'gcvr. �MAM:f, OF T.yt SIIAL� �LJlr"NINlKUM WMT0 L5!- IPlM60AR�l COOi� NvOUS AT EXTERIOR . WAI, L = }/l�`' MKA� I4 rtt�t0 w 1-r I NSI L AT tr�'a.c. WEI- I^_p6E- f 12" 0.c. �W k '. 3 f el `' )APA [�tY� T j G S HAT}) w b. &LVE SZAJ W I T 0 10j %2V1" NAIL Al b"0.c- PA EN F- ( Iv' 0.C. r."I^GD . V O V W W w W W O W �a O� v Lu m zLU�z in 13 2 LULuLu Q O 06 ry N Lu t� Z _ O X V Lu Lu J ry F --N N �_ w = 0:� z w Q v kD w F- O LL w w_ J LL 1.0 N d _ _ Ln u Oz iF V Z Z O1 as .� LL_ LL O O � � O O O LL_ E L � o U n Lu 0 O =s � o ��.� WLU�o A L W w t C, c� 3 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: 53 BONUS ROOM ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" MARK THU5 : "2/1" IMN(A 1t NUM 9CK 0r FFAK1 6/)e WO 5fj,b5. 111 M1,01MOM - F-ocr : s-to"AFt Rei-fED �HEATRPJt, WITH ICA VAu_ AT "0.C.. FAM C -L CSGf t tz" 0.e. FIEL.A. MALL: ?Iib,' ATA Wfci) SkFITNtNG W170 Sed NAW AT W'04_ PA10F4, a&E I Ir o.c. rlm. V O V W W w W W O Lu �a O� v LU m z Lu < in z tJ 2 w Luw Q O 06 ry N Lu t� Z _ X V Lu Lu J 1y F-- N �_ w = N z w Q v kD w O 7) F LL w w_ J LL 1.0 N 0� d _ _ Ln u LL O iF O Z V Z 1..L O m V E Ld0 N 0 Lu 0 0 = s �>Q12 WLU�o W w c� 3 DATE: 3/22/2023 SHEET: 54 'mcu3urowa3nu 9096'019'991 16999 NW'VIVYAVI.d 9E,3L5133N5 W.asno0619.49.1an0•m-mn 'DNI`SNOLL33'1332I 3WOH '3Ad"13H13 169E 99,1.0na 7R 39(10HN915305iJ3AIMin in aiciNe 311531 v NHo..,,,Y]99, 51Pd120 Tea1f117neus GLMAIN N3adA W W Y1OA 5Ndid'14OW3b 3NVN3lu ,A9030V�04d S9NIh.NMC1 o, vi i __ I1 E;11 —_Hf- 1 o ,kw. .a A A a 5 ', I z w i'l tilt ._ g ri g d Z§ Gi 2 24Ziã *iH p w 9 O. O~H \ ~ U 5�w \l T qw ,D cn L,„ 1 cn 7 fn w 48 C8 48 "g .2 ! g y�0 1 e..o lS _ ) NNIAI ,>,' @i 21.111.11.111.ffiffig t,. I r I ----r Z- I Z-- Z 3 OQ �$@ Oa O QQ}}p1 �ZS S` iUu \1 .„ �O 335 C 3b� �N , / (i Xi WU 3m 'I 48 i W1 ill 48 a° 6 1�-LL wD V.z ,, 1 — 4 I j` aPAWM a r 1L 1 z' I g� i z! ��=:1 H 45 w� wU.— mm ww WI g lk :j & u gsg� @O r 6( Q o ��\ a'P 0= - o \ Uw o oai a h W8 w� w8' c, GO coio ,, CO 1Z. o u3. ok LL t. 13. C.) X d W Cf Ln 11.1 lfl > Z I —I 1U z '- 11-1 N V I C { 1 - J. I i r i 1 — -1 I I II I I I I I I I 0 I l I I I I I I o o i 1 _, ,0 . 1 ,_ tii1' '-- '1J o 2 O w CC 0 DW W 1 c Um Z ® a. _J \`\ Will OU r \ —1 \\ \�\ ! +l• r 2 U Q �`t�_5- 0� - - - - a- -lz�; 1, IL 1 #w�1. o I El �1107. 1_..-1-'1/:(7-\\1,\.\\ It o __:-I,L.: j co 17--,/-.____ / \ o � N Qup o0 L.L. O � aO.. 7?7 0 iy� ? ¢ z w 00 O - cJ Cr y ❑W I ❑ CD CO w 0 W W < W aW 1-fY WCOI m CO¢ z ¢ w0 Ct W : � 0zCL F- W z0 ❑ ❑ < ¢ CC W 5 5 w ❑ mm - N w ^e, k . y y '�p $ b f��^+ t. tM1 p 2 �5 11.1 U' w ' . �. W o 3 J Oe2•Y? si 0 ct w�= 0 Zatf �` W III LL INN :t1i Z W , : mem..4,4,L*11,..:H Z • W 'f illo h �I a 2 ix { W�s 9 Y 0 a ul 2 2 . -. :. X t W k fix +a=' . . ''' ''''; W 41; 0 , { Z if_ als 0= WU CC L wo W > - .CIJ 0 a I t• • „ . „ .,„. . E :,7...,„., •• ,-,,4,,,,•• • ,,,•, .....• . ,...,,,.. „ • a , , . . . • •. . • • . ., ,..„ .. . . 4 . . •• 4„....*,,,,...„„.•.•„.„:„:„.„,„„.: L,., ,...r• , , _, . ul a o 12 I J LL W Ammo Immo .. O 0 t. EMUW ima W o ¢ Z 41 rb•4a y w o w a � • > - ¢ o • IL rcK •em,a�# W � z g• art Z Ill e ''''•::'.'.:1-,1.-.'1', LL Z Z g 11:,-- s°,; ( Y Cr .t 0 ! g = W ` C7 ? Uj U 3 ! Z r O ., ` �` �o W Z Ma I , W Q P .k+ .p:1 °133- O • it y' b r W .....,_..,.:._:.i..._ u '-'..-' ..,__,:',., /oil ,._ ,.•••..- T. .. >ill-','• ..,•,'-' . _ . ' / .• i - •.•,, -, - . 1111,4':ili_.':_ -.•.;,,-1 ,,.....; ,...•:. ! U �_- z O f \ r , ------7 , m� li i r r O / Y w UIl w 0 W m O i I—w CC ¢2 o .. U) ._. , _ f — N., _____ Af J I I I I I 11 ill I I ill I I ill I I L-L-_L_J_+____ il}L_--.1 _r- ---- s it ! ® I. I I L_ V 1 W 1 ( Z J ❑ Y ri- W A n �I Q oQ . '1 eL _1 w m IS) � Q 0 co Lz rti JO I LL I— r 0 W Q r I Q 2 z W (I) Y 0 ❑r W u) =❑ r l Qp ' ,r � PI I % - ..._ f 1 ... Z • ❑❑ Y IN= W UQ LLI CC `vl L.L. \ \ I \\ (j Z O - : Y Q H --O , I VYW Y , WUa UW I pW w , 0p > I z 0 Z I 1 � � I-- t — I .„ -...s . a°,- I.I. *, ., .3, W 0 W _ J H Q W W W W X W CC W CC cri (.) , ,, : w :. " P a - ''' - .. 4 S. , . ... „.,...„ - ' r,, . .:, :„.„,,,,,,, L1J . . , S , Z '-,...;,i,'''.:. ,' ,-'''''.--,..• ' ,-. Tia LL ,,,,,,.: ! al• U CD ' : MIN 11 Z CC 111) U:::::111111•1 -i': . - ilk , W mil, milli Mil' - wow • -- , .. w LL 111 F1 t .1,. r \ •, 0 CT). _ › W 0 . • ,.. W , Y MI r.R.-.--',-, . ,..,.. ..,_,...„ IIII - - .. . , ,,,.......4,.. ....... c ix •7-t---:z _(,) ,-„,-, - ,,,, ,,i. ,—,-,-- •:,.. ; , , ---...:,-.,..A - 6 6,...-- ,;:k -y A---, '. A. - f , / - .. - ..'.'---0„,._ -( , -:'',:, --1,.:, ' ' s'‘t . ,,-...,„,.,4 12';',e-' j, i'',. 7',''41 - - ', ,‘ '1'5? 0° S. W U-1 0 a 0 Y'' mo-•,... . ,. 1 •, . . , ,t.:- ,,.r. LU 0- Y CC W 0 A . . W 0 .. \ 44 __,, CD „ z u) ---........_,. Ana . \ \ ''' \ W 0 r - -cf.) , t ' E, 1\ EftlitTle Iiiii. W '.., ... il ,_.., < , _,, _I.-.... --- ll,.„:401/Cf, .,.... , ' * , . Lz° Ill 1=w cam CC W 0 W 0cez w>I- z0x r .J► C 1 1 I i i I Iu I f_ a.40'S I I 4- Z I I ___o I H O Q 1 i 1 1 tt U) I 3A ' 1 4- .iI O I �a4o'S II D # I j I Z I toIic O °z II m I 1 T ri 11 1 I 11 1 III 1 I7r —r. 1 _ _ 1,,,d- r , 1,1, , , , , .....„,, lAG'S 1 i fi o ❑ I Cl) 1 n ' ' 1 1 ,T -1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I r 1 z 1 ill 1 1 i l i 1 1 1 I Y -1 , I I 1 1 III I i i I L — I .1-J -1 i I Q �- - - - I LL-l-1 1 Win 11YM4 Z I I I I II I i I 0 I ' I I I 0 i I I iI ( ❑ I I I CO 0 0 0 . O I-L L00 u) 0 D z1-1- 0 0 mz g0 CCF- w „ .,. O IYa ow ❑ 0 ww zc 4 ..., L.Li 0 a L.L.. 0 ....,,, 0 z iv 1. um .. Iff 'CT _..._ I:' LU CI ILI 12 L. „mil L.L. Li 0 in i 5 - ILI co- -,....... ,,„:',...i.„:„...... -, 'TAX Xi IOW 1111 \-j_---..--------:." Mil - ..., er 2 ui 0 2 0 1Y CY ..,* 0 0u) w z © a 0 §ca Co y-,--r, ,- ..: . ii, .t. z .., ,,i.... ‘ L.L. :tNINI`.iy 0 w 2 ,.3 0 0 . . . , c, 0') D Z , - .. 0 S0 !ft 00 ' Hiri, , Z j 4 _ ' * WI ' , ,.. . U) 7<. t w / u_ ' ' •-• Th". 1 L'Ar.- iii ---.., i".;14. k 1 ‘tr - ; .1 LU (7) LU <:( - . -.....s.i.,,• .-4 ' ' .',,' $ , A ir o - .,--e";/7\ cn f • w rr w z w Q �z I t cc Q I-Lli S , W 12( 0 EL W —`�,t , Z C] / \\\ \ Z 0 i --.--- t ` ,� ', 00111111 0dD \:.•,-< \ t '-"__""__ 1 _\ _ r- 1 1—e...f. 1 1 , \ �- \ .. r _ 4 _ 1 I �'' 1 4 4. *---• " L ) ) -" -.` eil (4 ____:_l-r---1.L___I ,_j____ 1 _j 1 I� �I 1--z up 2 W d LU' CY O ❑ W Q r / w a. / w o O o / w �� 11 ww ❑ aw (.7 Q CC zDQ . U H ccYU) � C- UZ ili OuJ5O � 8ZUn H w p p UnDQQ 6 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2691 Ethel Avenue, Orono Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date SB Job Number: 37735-001 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Tier 1 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER Prepared by: Tier 2 Tier 3 4/18/2023 JPR Tier 4 Tier 5 In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 2,389 S. F. B Bituminous Driveway 3,330 S. F. C Concrete Walk and Stoop 170 S. F. D Deck and Stairs 817 S. F. E Paver Walk 76 S. F. F Retaining Walls 218 S. F. G S. F. H S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. 0 S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 7000 S. F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): D Deck 100 S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S. F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 6900 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 33836 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 20.39% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2691 Ethel Avenue, Orono — Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 4/19/2023 SB Job Number: 37735-001 Prepared By: JPR Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 2,366 S. F. B Existing Bituminous Driveway 3,330 S. F. C Proposed Bituminous Driveway 1,483 S. F. D Proposed Deck and Stairs 899 S. F. E Proposed Concrete Walk 89 S. F. F Proposed Stoop 144 S. F. G Retaining Walls 110 S. F. H Proposed step stones 96 S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 8517 S. F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): D Deck 100 S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S. F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 8417 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 33836 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 24.88% (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. J '� —R t � air � Y��F9 S. •�� /_�' �.. ��+� 7a,�x'x'�•. Or f �� z . �+ Via, . • � � s- �' �� :000"' *; ` n r 'Ile �..r .., Ar iota IL t • -� e f_ To Whom It May Concern: Teresa Elsbernd of Home Reflections, Inc, the builder for John and Leslie Cadle, has spoken to me about the remodeling plans for their recently purchased home at home at 2691 Ethel Ave. This home is the second property to the left of my home. The planned improvements do not impact me or my view of the lake in any way. The renovations would provide much needed updating and be an enhancement to the neighborhood. If the City approvesYheir plans, I have no issue and am in support of the improvements. r /1 ! Janet Kauffm�nr,L=�� To Whom It May concern: (Date) Teresa Elsbernd of Home Reflections, Inc, the builder for John and Leslie Cadle, has spoken tome about the remodeling plans for their recently purchased home at home at 2691 Ethel Ave. This home is directly adjacent to the left of my property. The planned improvements do not impact me or my view of the lake The renovations would provide much needed updating and be an enhancement to the neighborhood. if the City approves their plans, I have no issue and am in support of the improvements. Marc Cohen (Date) City of Orono MN 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Melanie Curtis Planner Ref: LA23-000021 2691 Ethel Avenue PID: 2011723240046 Dear Melanie, Thank you for your email of May 4, 2023 and the property plan information files and narrative document for the proposed property variance referenced above. Please find below our formal comments to be included in the public packet. I am also planning to attend the meeting at this time. We are land and lake (Carman Bay) neighbors to the north of the 2691 Ethel Property and have an address of 2684 Casco Point Road. We have owned our property with its Lakeshore since 1981. Before our arrival, Dorothy Kerns was the owner as I recall at the 2691 Ethel Ave property and lived in a one story - less than approx. 1000 sq -ft structure - about 90 feet to the west from the current structure. The Kerns home was demolished and a city variance passed to allow M. Revier to build the existing structure about 90 feet closer to the lake on the very pointed five -sided property (2011723240046) around 1993. In the LA23-000021 variance application narrative, the Cadle's indicate that they looked for the "right property" for some time and are planning to 'enjoy lake life' after the proposed renovation is completed. As we viewed the proposed LA23-000021 packet, we find that they will be improving the structure and exterior appearance of the existing house to a great extent. We welcome them to the neighborhood. Of slight concern to the property is the eventual landscaping plan and implementation which is not necessary for us to review as it should be of superior quality as are the building plans. We would however like them to consider maximizing mutual privacy and minimize runoff as standard practice which we believe they would. Saving as many trees as possible would also be important. Of more concern for us and most likely the three other affected Carman Bay lakeshore neighbors, is that the future Cadle Lakeshore dock and watercraft usage plans -if any, comply with the existing LMCD variance order for the 2011723240046 property. A brief historical review: After construction of the new Revier house in 1993, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District rendered a shared single dock / length / watercraft number /beam and dock location variance order on January 26, 1994 for shared rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka which include eight specific conditions (see LMCD order) related to these lakeshore neighbor PID's: Page 1 of 2 040�0 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO3 2 6 ' A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) FILE NO. 1804 ,WHEREAS, Michael Revier (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2691 Ethel Avenue within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 115, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, except that part thereof lying southeasterly. of a line drawn from a point on the southwesterly line of said tract distant 15' northwesterly from the most southerly comer of said tract, through the northeasterly corner of said tract (hereinafter "the property"); and is WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the construction of a new principal structure to be placed in front of the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1804. 2. The property is located in the LR -1C Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a half acre or 21,780 s.f. in area. The property consists of approximately 33,140 s.f. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 15, 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A. The proposed location for the residence with walkout design is ideal for existing sloping topography and will minimize excavations and need for retaining walls. Page 1 of 4 F" 5005 Disk Omm • lir CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.32fl B. The proposed location of the structure will not require the removal of mature trees within the lakeshore yard. Applicant has agreed to install plantings along east side lot line to minimize visual impact of driveway and side garage door. C. The property exceeds the area and width requirements. D. No other variances are required for the proposed improvement. E. The former residence was also located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. F. The higher elevations and existing mature plantings along the north lot line will minimize impact of lakeshore views of residence at 2684 Casco Point Road. It is also noted that a garage exists to the south side of the residence with no view windows to the lakeshore. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, - but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered, this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the placement of a new principal residence in front of the average lakeshore setback line, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 Foim 5M ask Orono • • ti CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N0.13 2 6 9 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 12, 1994). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property.. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of April, 1993. A IT: Dorothy. llin, City Clerk Edward J. C liahan, r., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin; Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. LINDA S. VEE o Public NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires 8-12-96 page 3 of 4 r. F= SOS Disk Orono 14k AV (r G�'/ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 10 t� On this /a`�-A _ day of &4&j _ , 199.3 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared b _ 61gA14 r ,t'm M'A known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) � L • 10 C On this day of , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC 0 Page 4 of 4 rom eons Dish Oran, 38 20-117-23 23 0001 38 20-117-23 23 0021 38 20-117-23 24 0013 GERALD ERICKSON DAVID D GUTERMUTH BARBARA S O'REILLY SANDRA ERICKSON LYNN J GUTERMUTH 2700 ETHEL AVE PO BOX 584 2665 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0002 38 20-117-23 23 0022 38 20-117-23 24 0014 ROBERT E BREON ATRION FAIOLA & LISA FAIOLA LAWRENCE D PILLAR JULIE C BRANDSMA 2659 CASCO POINT RD 6827 CARDINAL COVE DR 2691 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0003 38 20-117-23 24 0001 38 20-117-23 24 0015 BRYANT SLOSS DAVID L RUNKLE TING FANG LIN KIMLOAN NGUYEN SLOSS 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2725 ETHEL AVE 2695 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0004 38 20-117-23 24 0002 38 20-117-23 24 0016 MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER TODD M KIMMES RYAN C GATES/MELISSA N LYON 2697 CASCO POINT RD 2660 CASCO PT RD 2745 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 38 20-117-23 24 0003 38 20-117-23 24 0017 SHIRLEY A JUNGELS DAVID L RUNKLE KENNETH R SADDLER THOMAS J JUNGELS 2684 CASCO POINT RD SHERALYN K SADDLER 7730 LOCHMERE TER WAYZATA MN 55391 2755 ETHEL AVE EDINA MN 55439 MIROMAR LAKES FL 33913 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0006 38 20-117-23 24 0004 38 20-117-23 24 0018 JOANN SUE GINKEL DAVID L RUNKLE DONNA L LILE 2745 CASCO POINT RD 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2765 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0009 38 20-117-23 24 0005 38 20-117-23 24 0019 CITY OF ORONO CYNTHIA J WUNDERLICH TRUST JUSTIN J HOLMERS P O BOX 66 FREDERIC D WUNDERLICH TRUST MICHELLE N HOFFMAN CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 18080 VIA BELLAMARE LANE 3800 CASCO AVE MIROMAR LAKES FL 33913 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0010 38 20-117-23 24 0007 38 20-117-23 24 0020 CITY OF ORONO RANDALL L ENGELHART JEFFREY A SCHUTT P O BOX 66 ELIZABETH A ENGELHART PIA E SCHUTT CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 2715 CAROLINE AVE 2750 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0011 38 20-117-23 24 0008 38 20-117-23 24 0021 CITY OF ORONO DONALD J & DAWN R HEBIG JEFFREY LOEHMANN P O BOX 66 2735 CAROLINE AVE SARA JOHNSON CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 2710 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 38 20-117-23 24 0010 38 20-117-23 24 0022 ZHIHUA LIU & YING LIU LANCE L & RHODA L VICKNAIR BREON IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TR 2677 CASCO POINT RD 2740 ETHEL AVE 2901 ROSEDALE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 DALLAS TX 75205 38 20-117-23 24 0025 38 20-117-23 24 0041 38 20-117-23 310071 HARRY E PULVER JR ROBERT T LUND MARTI LYNN 105 MEADOW LANE N 2732 CAROLINE AVE STEVEN ROBERT GOUDY MINNEAPOLI MN 55422 WAYZATA MN 55391 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0029 38 20-117-23 24 0044 38 20-117-23 32 0017 DUSTIN J KINDL JANET C KAUFFMANN TAMMY L WOODIS CASIE L KINDL 2696 ETHEL AVE MARC BRICKMAN 2649 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0030 38 20-117-23 24 0045 38 20-117-23 32 0021 TIM HANSON MARC COHEN BRIAN SWANSON 1270 ARBOR ST 2697 ETHEL AVE SAMANTHA ERIN SIMON WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0031 PATRICIA REDMOND WEBBER 15159 TECHNOLOGY DR. EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 38 20-117-23 24 0032 THOMAS & PATRICIA KUBALAK 2623 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0033 ZIV & TAL LIBERMAN 2690 CAROLINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0034 JONATHAN MARSHALLA 2696 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0038 JENNIFER HARRIS QUINTIN ANDREW HARRIS 2618 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0039 JEANNE KOBS & MICHAEL KOBS 2648 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0040 CATHERINE R & JOEL W SHOOP 2720 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0046 JOHN K CADLE/LESLIE G CADLE 2691 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310003 JILL R & WILLIAM H KOCH II 3730 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310009 ALISA A MILLER 3753 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310010 PAULJFUHRMAN COLLEEN FUHRMAN 3759 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310011 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310062 DAVID HEISER JENNIFER ANN HEISER 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310066 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 4/19/2023 2941 R "�M 26 914 M 2635 ' —'q — 11 Pm 4� f 2648 S 2660 RI 2694 31 pl 209 .+l 269-4 %I yi s 26'37 268E 2715 �+ f17i ,l{i 690 2JD5 2725 2745 ' r 272 2726 2732 :"J s _ r , . , 3130 .f• i3, ;an 374U .7`,591 274$n,1� N 3753 3704 2824 3721 3654 .. { 3765 /3743 3fi3 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I 1 1 2691 Ethel Ave This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 /gis.info@hennepin.us