Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-08-2023 Council PacketAgenda Council Meeting Monday, May 8, 2023 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of April 24, 2023 2. City Council Work Session Minutes of April 24, 2023 3. Claims/Bills 4. Approval of 2023 Garbage Hauler Licenses 5. Approval of Rental License 6. Authorization to Promote Tony Wittke – Police Deputy Chief 7. Authorization to Promote Ryan Spencer – Police Sergeant 8. Authorization to Accept Resignation of Hunter Buchanan – Part-Time CSO (Cadet) 9. Authorization to Accept Resignation of Chris Fischer – Resolution No. 7360 10. Approval of Wage Adjustment for LELS Local 40 11. 2023 Street Maintenance Project (23-001) – Award 12. Emergency Watermain Bypass and New Watermain Installation at the Coffee Bridge 13. LA23-000002 – 1449 and 1475 Shoreline Drive, Vacation – Resolution No. 7361 14. LA23-000008 – David Charlez Designs – David Zweber, 1340 Vine Place, Variances – Resolution No. 7362 15. LA23-000019 – AS Designs o/b/o William and Marta Melin, 1940 Shadywood Road, Variances – Resolution No. 7363 16. LA23-000015 – Swanson Homes, 3017 North Shore Drive, Preliminary Plat – Resolution No. 7365 17. LA23-000016 – Carolina Cano-Garnica, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, Conditional Use Permit – Resolution No. 7366 18. Appointment of Parks and Planning Commissioners – Resolution No. 7367 and Resolution No. 7368 19. Appointment of 2023 Seasonal Employees V4 Community Development Report 20. LA22-000058 – Matthew Tierney/Shorewood Properties, 2305 Bayview Place & PID 17-117-23-44- 0032 (address unassigned) – Sketch Plan 21. LA23-000014 – Matthew & Susanne Johnson, 1007 Wildhurst Trail, Variance – Resolution No. 7364 Finance Report 22. 2022 Long Lake Fire Department Overage Fire Department Report 23. Fire Department Needs Assessment City Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report Agenda Council Meeting Monday, May 8, 2023 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us 24. Approval of Work Session Agenda Draft Public Comments – (Limit 3 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Mayor/Council Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2023 05/15 Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (Victoria Seals) 05/22 Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. 05/22 Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 05/29 City Offices Closed 06/05 Park Commission Work Session, 6:00 p.m. 06/12 Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. 06/12 Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 06/20 Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (Matt Johnson) 07/03 City Offices Closed 07/04 City Offices Closed 07/05 Park Commission Work Session, 6:00 p.m. 07/10 Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. 07/10 Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 07/17 Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (Dennis Walsh) 07/24 Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. 07/24 Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 10 ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Matt Johnson, Alisa Benson, and Richard Crosby III. Victoria Seals was absent. Representing Staff were Leah Koch sitting in for City Attorney Soren Mattick, City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, Public Works Superintendent David Goman, Finance Director Ron Olson and City Accountant Carrie Krienke. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved by consensus. CONSENT AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 10, 2023 2. COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF APRIL 10, 2023 3. CLAIMS/BILLS This item was removed from the Consent Agenda 4. APPROVAL OF NEXT DRAFT WORK SESSION AGENDA This item was removed from the Consent Agenda 5. EQUIPMENT LOAN AGREEMENT FOR COMMAND VEHICLE TO LONG LAKE FOR USE BY LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT This item was removed from the Consent Agenda 6. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR MARK MCCUTCHEON– RESOLUTION NO. 7539 7. APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR FOR DEMOLITION OF 140 HACKBERRY HILL 8. APPOINTMENT OF 2023 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES V3 9. EMERGENCY WATERMAIN BYPASS AT THE COFFEE BRIDGE Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda with items 3, 4 and 5 removed. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 3. CLAIMS/BILLS Johnson said he wanted to ask about the billed overages on the budget for Long Lake Fire and what is included in this amount. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 10 Finance Director Olson explained that according to the contract, if there is an overage, the City would pay its percentage of the operating budget. The invoice just says $46,010.50 as Orono’s share of the overage. Olson said he contacted Long Lake for some detail. The amount includes $15,000 for the payout of the fire chief’s unpaid sick and vacation when he left; an overage of fire call pay of $21,000; winterizing the Zodiac boat; $17,000 for training for eight new fire fighters; and $5,600 for travel/mileage reimbursement where he said they normally budget zero. Olson said the fire call overage is nearly 50 percent which doesn’t necessarily make sense. He said he would like more information on that and the training and travel. Johnson asked if under the existing contract the City is obligated to pay any overage they charge, whether Long Lake accrues for pay-outs for time off and whether there have been overages in previous years. Olson said that is how the contract reads. Last year the overage was $15,000. He added that Orono accrues for payout of benefits but evidently Long Lake does not. Leah Koch, attending for City Attorney Mattick, said she personally has not reviewed the contract but will make a note to clarify the City’s obligations under the contract. Johnson said if everyone's in agreement, he would like to get more details on precisely what the City of Orono is being asked to pay and whether it is operational or capital improvements. Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the claims and bills minus the Fire Protection Services 2022 Fire Overages in the amount of $46,010.50. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF NEXT DRAFT WORK SESSION AGENDA Walsh said he pulled this off the consent agenda because there were a couple of things planned for the May 22 work session that he did not think belonged there. He said he would move to postpone the Community Survey Discussion to December 11 and delete the meeting decorum discussion because political grievances do not have a place at Council meetings and work sessions. Johnson asked how items are getting on the work session agenda. City Administrator Edwards reminded the Council that having a draft work session agenda approved at the previous Council meeting is a fairly new process. Some items are routine and come up year after year. Other items are requested by Council members. Walsh and Johnson said they did not think the draft work session agendas should be on consent portion of the agenda because it is necessary for the Council to review the items and vote on them. Benson asked to clarify if the procedure will be to throw out suggestions for the next work session topics at a work session and then vote on them at a Council meeting. She said she was fine with throwing out ideas in the work session and taking the work session draft agenda off consent, because then we can be in agreement about what's coming. She noted that her only question is with regard to work session agenda items. It may be at times that one Council member has ideas or two that are valid ideas, and this is a place to discuss them. Meeting decorum is something that she feels strongly about given what's happening right now in our community. That is something that she thought was worthy of Council time, at least in a work MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 10 session. She asked if moving the topic of a community survey to December would make it too late to budget for it in 2024. Walsh moved, Johnson seconded, to approve May 22 City Council Work Session agenda with a community survey discussion postposed to December 11 and the meeting decorum discussion removed. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1 (Benson). 5. EQUIPMENT LOAN AGREEMENT FOR COMMAND VEHICLE TO LONG LAKE FOR USE BY LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT Johnson said he asked to have discussion on this item because he wanted to be clear about the request. He said to recap history, two Fire Department command vehicles were purchased. The City of Orono paid for 85 percent of one Tahoe vehicle that is being used by the Long Lake Fire Department and 100 percent of the second vehicle. At the time Long Lake Fire said they did not need the second vehicle and so it was assigned to Orono Fire Chief James Van Eyll as part of his contract. According to Johnson, Orono also provided Long Lake Fire with a Ford Explorer that was going out of service as a police vehicle on a short- term loan, but that is proving to be a longer loan. The former police vehicle has been painted and wrapped for Long Lake Fire. It was in a minor accident but has been repaired. The current request from Long Lake Fire is for use of the second Tahoe currently being used by Van Eyll. Edwards concurred with that summary. Benson asked if the City is obligated to provide the Orono Fire Chief with a vehicle and whether the vehicles Long Lake Fire currently have are meeting their needs. Edwards said the City does have to provide a take-home vehicle to the fire chief under his contract and he and Crosby said that the former police vehicle had been outfitted for Fire Department use. Johnson said he believes Orono has done its part by providing the extra vehicle already. Council members discussed the need to have a formal agreement with the City of Long Lake for the continued loan for the former police vehicle and also expressed a willingness to sell it to the City of Long Lake if they would like to buy it. Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to deny the request from the City of Long Lake for an agreement to use Orono’s fire command vehicle. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT 10. FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT City Accountant Carrie Krienke gave the first quarterly financial report with a slide presentation covering revenues, expenditures, permits and investments. She said at the end of the first quarter revenues stand at 13.3 percent of budget which is slightly below last year but on track where the City needs to be. Several sources of revenue such as property taxes and other government grants and funding sources are not received until June. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 10 The general fund expenditures at the end of the first quarter are at 22.4 percent which is on target for the year. There are a few departments that are tracking over budget. The first one is the Mayor/Council due to the fact that member services in organizations like the League of Minnesota Cities are already paid for the year. There has also been a higher-than-normal utilization of trainings available to the Council. The next is legal services resulting from a number of lawsuits which have a cost of $80,000 to date. Staff is considering recording these expenses to the insurance fund as a way to keep the department at a budgeted level for the year. The next is fire protection which has already been discussed. Engineering is at 50 percent right now. This is for the overage for GIS as the City continues to improve the cartograph database. The department is a very small piece of the general fund budget, she said, and staff will monitor this department budget through the rest of the year. Building permit revenue increased in January and February and decreased slightly in March with an overall first quarter increase in building permit revenue of 3.6 percent from last year. The City’s investments have earned interest of $71,924 the first quarter of 2023 compared to $20,300 for the same period last year. Olson reported the auditors will start their audit next Monday at City Hall. PUBLIC WORKS REPORT 11. POSITION DESCRIPTION AND RECRUITING APPROVAL / UTILITY MAINTENANCE Edwards said Public Works is looking at some organizational changes bringing forward the creation of a utility worker position. This does not change the overall number of employees in Public Works, but would reclassify two of the positions from general maintenance workers to utility workers. He said reasons include recognizing the additional licensing and expertise required by utility workers with the ever-increasing technology base within City utilities. It would bring some of the things that the City currently has to outsource to contractors in-house after sending a couple of the workers to required trainings. It would also create some growth opportunities with the department. Currently if you come in as a maintenance worker, the only opportunity you might have for some kind of increases is if one of the two supervisors was to retire, you might be able to apply for those jobs. Edwards said if the most senior employees were selected for these positions the budget impact is estimated at a $5,700 difference for each position which is easily within the budget. It is also important to recognize that those two positions would be budgeted out of utilities, which are enterprise funds. So it's just one more piece that we're trying to get focused, to get a more skill set within the utilities. That doesn't mean that the individuals will not be helping on the streets or parks. But their primary focus will be on the utilities. We have 52 sewage lift stations that we maintain, a number of fire hydrants, three water treatment facilities, and it's becoming more focused in those areas on preventive maintenance. Walsh pointed out that some years ago none of those 46 lift stations had backup generators and now most do. And by doing that, you’ve got more preventative maintenance. We outsource that, and now we're bringing it in-house. So I think it's a smart thing to do. Johnson said he likes hearing that we are finding ways to train our own people and outsourcing less. And that's part of what this will allow the City to do. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 10 Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the Position Description and Recruiting for a Utility Maintenance Position. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Koch had nothing to report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT Edwards said the City had spring cleanup at City Hall over the weekend with more than 400 residents participating. There were a number of construction debris items this year which is positive thing is it gets it out of our ditches and our drainage leads. The City is now in the process of having that material removed and getting things cleaned up for the summer. He said last week the police department was partially involved in a car chase that ended up with a vehicle accident that took out a major power line in the area. Eighteen of those 46 lift stations were without power for about three hours. Of those 18, nine of them had backup generators. For those other nine, the Public Works’ staff had to tow portable generators around, pump the lift station down and move on to the next one. They were out for about three to four hours. Johnson said he was at the brush site this weekend on Saturday and it was very busy. He said staff was doing a good job of educating residents on some of the changes and gaining their cooperation, although a few people managed to drop off wood that was too large to be chopped up. Edwards said the City did a lot of public education in the newsletter and out on the City website, along with some emails and new signage, but will have to continue education. Organizational changes this year included two separate locations for accepting brush and other organics like wood chips. Leaf and grass drop offs are now condensed and moved to the facility on McCulley Road in an effort to streamline wait times for the public. 12. PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY (21-039) – IT, AV AND SECURITY SYSTEMS INSTALLATION APPROVAL Edwards said this item is a is a continuation of the new Public Works facility project to approve all of the audio video IT-type items for the facility. Last fall we went out for bids for construction of the shell and the site work. Audio video was one of those things that that was recommended that we do as a separate item. This will include security cameras, access control, voice and data throughout the building. The $139,000 cost was built into the overall budget of the project but was not included in the bids last fall. Benson asked about the total cost of the construction project, additional expenditures expected this year and whether the cost of the project is budgeted in facilities. Edwards said there are other items that have not been brought forward yet such as furnishings, internal equipment and bringing the building into service. Everything for the building comes through the facilities fund, a fund with different revenue sources such as the facilities levy and the bonded money which is MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 10 currently invested for the building project. This money will be drawn down as needed to pay for the construction project and outfitting of the building, all of which is in the total budget, he said. Walsh moved, Benson seconded, to approve the proposal for IT, AV and Security Systems installation at the new Public Works facility. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Kathy Sweetman 475 Deborah Drive, said tonight, she rose here to speak because of her concern regarding the dysfunctional pattern of communication regularly on display during the Orono City Council meetings. Also, she would be remiss not to comment that this evening, things have gone very well. She has observed; however, that verbal abuse pervades these meetings, and frequently. For example, instead of addressing a person's argument or position, the person's personal characteristics are viciously attacked. Name calling, cursing, accusatory speech, yelling and gaslighting are frequent in these meetings. The result is pervasive fear and intimidation. The Orono City Council code states that one of the chief roles of the Orono Mayor is to exert leadership in City affairs. She'd add that effective leaders also pause and listen carefully to others. Effective leaders respectfully consider input from diverse perspectives and move to maintain respectful civil communication while addressing civic matters. These essential leadership qualities are not displayed by Orono City Council leadership. Rather, it has embraced verbal abuse as though it's normal. And she would like to clearly say it is not normal, and it is not good for our City, nor is it good for our community. She does not claim to have a solution. But if the great Greek philosopher Plato is correct, that silence gives consent, tonight she must openly object. She does not consent, just silently witnessing abusive discourse. And she will stand in support of those who are seeking to restore civility and respect to our City meetings and to our community. She plead with the citizens of Orono to join together and speak out clearly to restore civility in our public discourse. Nancy Brantingham, 3185 County Road 6, said she would like to speak on behalf of myself and said that she entirely supports Dr. Sweetman’s comments. Also, because she believes that the citizens of this City have a right to be heard and Ms. Kim Carswell was not able to be here this evening. She asked me to read her statement and she is going to do so in support of my fellow citizen. From Kim Carswell at 261 Cygnet Place. This statement is in support of Kathy Sweetman’s statement on civility. The way this Council shows up and interacts with the public suggests a lack of interest and respect for citizens. This lack of respect and interest is also observed within the Council when certain members speak. The disinterested stone faces that we see in the audience suggest a dysfunctional team leading the City. Today she asks the Council to build a code of ethics and she will be proposing one in future meetings. The Council expects civility from the citizens and the citizens deserve civility from the Council. Todd Newcomer, 1070 Old Long Lake Road, said he came here tonight to ask for an open forum communication about the Fire Department. He has been informed that on May 22 a presentation is going to be made, a couple of weeks are going to go by, and then a final presentation will be made on June 22 in this forum where people are only allowed to comment for three minutes. What he is asking for is a chance for the men, women, and the children that are protected by Long Lake Fire Department to have the opportunity to ask questions, hear answers, and have a dialogue back and forth about this, not just making the statement and letting it go forward. But a lot of the questions they're going to have on the what, the MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 10 when, the how, how much and more importantly, the why -- a lot of these questions have come my way recently, because he is a retired firefighter. Some of those, just to name a few, are the why. What's wrong currently with a Long Lake Fire Department? Eighty percent of the costs are covered by Orono, but 80 percent of the calls are served by Orono. What's wrong with that? Does Orono have an oversight of the budget? And if so, have they ever looked into the budget? Has anyone ever been asked to increase the CIP? And if so, what was their response to that? And do they do it regularly? Why are the citizens paying for two Fire Chiefs? Right now you're paying 80% of Long Lake’s Fire Chief, and a Fire Chief that currently is being paid with no Fire Department. And on that note, he's doing a needs assessment with no Fire Department. So there's a need for a Fire Department. That's an easy assessment. You guys have made an offer to Long Lake to purchase their station, the rolling stock and equipment. But that's already been paid for by the public. So why should the public do that twice? Let me just move to a quote that I thought was really interesting. “I feel very strong about the need for more transparency of how, when and to what our taxpayer dollars are being spent. As a business owner and operator, I've always found it very important to have and ask a lot of the right question, so when you make a decision, it is a well-educated decision, resulting in a better success rate or a solution the first time. These types of dialogue sessions need to be well-documented at the City Council level so all have a better understanding of the specific votes that are being cast. When there are major projects to be done, we need more public open houses and more public input. When citizens come to the Council Members with questions. I feel they deserve a better answer than what is currently at the City Council. That way we all have a better understanding of where our tax dollars are being spent.” He really liked that quote and thinks it an awesome quote. And that was from you, Mr. Mayor. Chelsea Wetrick said she’s not disappointed that he had a nice quote to read. It was from your slave owner this time. Yeah, roll your eyes. She finds it funny that he says that people shouldn't swear or attack personally when you two are the ones that call people out from your podium. And then you call people out and then run away for months at a time. It's very interesting. As you can see, everybody wants you to figure this out. So, what is your game plan? Are you just going to sit and wait for it to end, because it's not going to end? You're going to need to do something to fix it. Pay attention here. You're going to have to fix it, your poison you spread. You find this funny to all these other people who listen to you and your poison and you with your January 6 stuff. And you know, it's just, it's bull. And you want to talk about not swearing? Give me a break. We need new people in the Council. Everybody wants you to answer this, to figure it out. Again, it's not gonna go away. Figure it out, man up. Brad Erickson, 2485 Independence Road, said he has got a proposal this evening. We'll get to that in a minute. He did a Freedom of Information Act request and has no less than five emails here that came in in December, 2020 regarding his links to the Proud Boys. Okay, so Victoria knew about it. You knew about it, of course you knew about it. You were there. And some other folks. And nothing was done. So, a lot of people up there knew and are sheltering this guy. So, my question is, who knew about the J6 stuff? And why isn't anyone coming forward and talking about that? His proposal this evening has to do with Mr. Walsh. This is his proposal -- 700 mayors across the country have spoken out against growing anti- semitism. He'll read some of the ones from Minnesota and he would challenge you guys to sign up on this. As a City, as a mayor, as an elected official, do the right thing for once. Blaine, Brooklyn Center, Burnsville, Edina, Golden Valley, Jordan, Mendota Heights, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Richfield, Rochester, St. Louis Park -- your alma mater, and St. Paul. We need to add Orono to this list. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 10 He wants to remind you of what brought us to this point. You, Mr. Walsh. So, you can call me whatever names you want. But you guys brought me here. This is from you. Erickson said recently the Michigan GOP had a photo of all the rings that were collected from the Jewish people after they were murdered. You know what the difference was with the Michigan GOP or the Michigan State House? They voted the very next day to condemn that kind of rhetoric. You guys still have yet to do that. It's been a year. And then this was from the Minnesota GOP. You want to hear what David Hahn had to say about you Mr. Walsh? Walsh said his three minutes were up and asked if there was anyone else who wanted to speak. Richie Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road, said he wanted to give a quick update on the LMCC and commended the young woman giving her first financial report at the meeting. He noted she was being mentored by the City’s Finance Director. And the Public Works incentive thing, is a fantastic idea, because we have great Public Works folks. And if the only way they can get a raise is to do what Adam was talking about, I think that's fantastic. He said the LMCC is searching for a new executive director and in the meantime, they have a wonderful interim person. We’re suggesting an $85,000 to $120,000 salary out of a $500,000 budget. We're working on a budget. He has a finance committee group that he is the chair of, and also the treasurer. He said the LMCC has accumulated a large surplus from the amounts that member cities pay in, so the proposed budget for 2023 would charge cities less. We got it passed in an operations committee meeting, and that'll hopefully be the budget that goes forward. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Benson said her intention in bringing the topic of a community survey up in a work session was to bring the City of Orono up-to-speed with some of our surrounding communities and neighbors. Our last comprehensive third-party survey was done about 15 years ago as part of our comp plan. We have not done a comprehensive third-party statistically-significant survey since then. She knows there was a Survey Monkey or something internal done awhile back, but that's not the same as a statistically-accurate survey that's comprehensive. She is sensitive as a new Council member and wonders how else she is to know how well she is doing her job or how we as a Council are representing citizens if we do not take the time to ask them in a way that's comprehensive and organized. In reviewing the city-wide surveys from Medina, Wayzata and Minnetrista, they've all conducted surveys fairly recently, in the last maybe four or five years and we haven't done that in about 15. As somebody who appreciates data and being able to make informed decisions based on what she sees represented in our community, that would be something she’d find very helpful. So, her intention in bringing it forward at an earlier time in the year was to allow for the possibility of budgeting for 2024. She noted that beginning in February, March, is when other communities are doing those surveys. She added sometimes it's easy to imagine somehow that we have our fingers on the pulse of our community, through emails or conversations here and there. It’s quite different to hear from 400 or 500 residents at a time and have that data crunch of those numbers run. She for one, would like to bring that to our community to offer that as part of the services we provide to the people who elected us. Benson said in other news, she attended the Long Lake Fire Department pancake breakfast yesterday, and it was very heartening to see how much care and effort goes into this event. It's been a while since she MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 10 attended the event. She noted they did a great job as usual. She also added that she had a chance to meet their new Chief, which was really exciting. She did talk to residents, both from Orono and Long Lake, and was struck by the common theme on the subject of fire service that comes up. She feels that Orono residents and the wider community do not have as good a grasp on this issue as they would like. Fire service is one of the most vital services that we provide to our residents. It’s also one that we as a Council have the opportunity to elevate to center stage in terms of community awareness and engagement. She sees a significant benefit to the City of Orono hosting an Open House forum with the community before any decisions are made regarding the future of our fire service. She noted from her perspective, this is important for three reasons. First, it's an opportunity to build trust, this Council is aware that members of the public would like accurate, comprehensive information on this issue. Second, as elected members of Council, we have a duty to inform our residents about City issues, especially those that can significantly change their quality of life and their tax burden. The issue of fire service encompasses our community’s history and tradition. Many Council Members have served before those of us who sit here now and many will in the future. It’s essential that we demonstrate for the record and for future generations that we took the time in this moment to listen to and inform our citizens to the best of our ability. She supports the idea of a public forum. She would appreciate that prior to any deliberations or votes on this Council. Johnson said he wanted to give special thanks that the dock on Big Island got put out, noting that Richie Anderson of North Shore Marina stores our dock. They're a floating dock so they have to stay in the water. We had damage to them last year. Tonka Built installed the docks and then added rollers on there to prevent future damage so we can have this dock for a long time but thanks to North Shore for allowing us to keep them there and to Jake with Tonka Built for getting it installed. Crosby noted there was a woman in the audience this evening who had comments about decorum and Council. He stated, he agrees with her wholeheartedly. If things are looked at honestly, he thinks the Council has held itself in check remarkably well, due to the onslaught of slander, viciousness, lies, threats, physical harm, and so forth. We conduct ourselves in this manner for our community because we represent the community of Orono. He added, when we're slandered on a regular basis, and lied about in social media, it gets a little old, folks and it’s damaging. He noted the irony of it is they don't even live in the community. He noted that he agrees with the remarks made those things should be conducted in a kind manner. He also added that the questions were already answered previously, months ago. So those things have already been addressed. The object is to get City's business done in a respectful manner, to handle each other in a respectful manner. That’s for the benefit of every citizen and everybody in our community. He said along with Councilmember Benson, he would like to commend Long Lake Fire Department for another great breakfast. He wasn't able to make it, unfortunately, but those events are always fantastic to go to and they appreciate your support. Walsh said he was also at the pancake breakfast. It was a great event. He got to meet the new Chief and talk to a whole bunch of the firefighters and just great people. He said he also attended the Northwest Hennepin League of Municipalities and met with the new Sheriff of Hennepin County, Dawanna Witt. He met her last year when he was helping her get elected. And she's a great lady. She has run into the same problems that he thinks all the law enforcement agencies have run across. They're down 30 percent and they've had to turn down two cities that needed help with their policing because they just do not have enough staff. He added Orono is fully staffed to 30 officers. So we have walked the walk and talked the MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 10 talk and done what you're supposed to do to protect your community. He had another Coffee with the Mayor on the second Wednesday of the month. It's always interesting. If you'd like to come in May that's going to be May 10 at 9 a.m. with coffee and donuts. Walsh said the Orono Foundation just had their yearly bash last weekend. They raise money for the schools for all the stuff that the schools don't have money for. He said COVID had hurt the event the last few years but it's starting to come back and they raised a lot of money. Walsh named several members of the high school speech team who had qualified for State and National competition and congratulated them. The boys basketball team took third in the State, so hats off to them as well to get that far. Walsh said his own daughter, who is a level nine gymnast, was the State champion and her age level. She also went to regionals a week and a half ago and won the regional championship of the seven-State area. In a few weeks she will go to nationals. So it's an exciting time with a lot of stuff going on. You got to see a couple things we got to talk about tonight with the lift stations and all the things that we've done, the Public Works facility that's going up, all the things that we're doing to make sure Orono was taken care of going into the next century on the budget. Don't believe anything you hear on social media. It's all in our budget. It's been done well. Walsh gave a quote from Theodore Roosevelt, “It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of all together secondary importance, and that in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things.” ADJOURNMENT Walsh moved, Crosby seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 7:32 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: _____________________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, April 24, 2023 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. Page 1 of 2 PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Alisa Benson, Richard F. Crosby II, and Matt Johnson. Staff members present were City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, Golf and Parks Superintendent Josh Lemons, Community Development Director Laura Oakden, Planners Natalie Nye and Melanie Curtis, and City Clerk Anna Carlson. 1.Planning & Park Commission Interviews Applicant Commission Interview Time Michael Huddy Park 5:00 – 5:15 Ted Schultze Planning 5:15 – 5:30 The Council members present interviewed the commission candidates. 2.Retaining wall Discussion Community Development Director Laura Oakden introduced the Retaining Wall discussion. She discussed the city code related to the subject, implementation, and issues that tend to show up with retaining walls. City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards explained the various retaining wall variations and their construction and impacts as shown on the presentation slides. Oakden finished the presentation by discussing DNR Shoreland Regulations and recommendations for best practices. She noted that additional research is needed for staff to develop best practices since the current code is somewhat restrictive. Staff is asking for direction from the council in regards to how to proceed and is asking for feedback related to retaining walls. Mayor Dennis Walsh noted that he is not sure if the process should be changed or moved out of the typical process by bringing it to Council. He added that he would like final decisions and approval to be brought before Council. Council Member Matt Johnson would like to get staff recommendations and encouraged them to research the topic further to make sure that the right people are making recommendations for approval. Council Member Crosby discussed giving more flexibility to residents and is opening to reviewing changes relating to in-kind wall replacements. Council gave direction to staff to bring this topic back to a work session for additional discussion. Adjourned: 5:55 p.m. Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, April 24, 2023 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO: ATTEST: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor _________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Ck Reviewed By: RJO Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 121046 to 121116 and ACH transaction 20130348 to 20130351 totaling $778,773.70. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Item No.: 3 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount BRAUN INTERTEC 04/25/2023 120966 B2301926 435-48976-304 23-001 2023 STREETS 2,598.75- BRAUN INTERTEC 04/25/2023 120966 B337461 402-48057-304 23-001 2023 STREET PROJECTCT Fox Street .00 Total 120966:2,598.75- NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.04/25/2023 121014 PERALIFE04 101-21710 PERA LIFE 5/2023 304.00- Total 121014:304.00- BRAUN INTERTEC 04/25/2023 121046 B2301926 435-48976-304 23-001 2023 STREETS 2,598.75 Total 121046:2,598.75 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.04/25/2023 121047 PERALIFE04 101-21710 PERA LIFE 5/2023 304.00 Total 121047:304.00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 04/28/2023 121048 2022.04 601-49400-322 04/23 UTILITY BILLS 342.40 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 04/28/2023 121048 2022.04 602-49450-322 04/23 UTILITY BILLS Sewer 342.40 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 04/28/2023 121048 2022.04 651-49910-322 04/23 UTILITY BILLS Storm Water 342.40 Total 121048:1,027.20 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05/08/2023 121049 500200225 710-49970-413 PW COPIER LEASE 3/20/23-04/20/23 138.76 Total 121049:138.76 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1HXG-HTP6 101-45200-223 CORK BORD 15"X1"Parks 9.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1HXG-HTP6 101-45200-223 PRINTER CARTRIDGES Parks 325.68 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-240 MANUAL TIRE SPREADER Public Works Department 129.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-601-49400-240 WIRE CONENECTORS AND TOOL 23.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-222 LLFD U-11 POWER CONVERTER Public Works Department 102.79 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-222 LLFD TAHOE SPARE TIRE HOIST Public Works Department 46.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-240 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 22.14 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-45210-240 AIR TANK REPAIR HOSE KIT Golf Course 18.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-226 PHONE CASE CITY PHONE Public Works Department 49.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/08/2023 121050 1P7F-MRP7-101-43000-489 PRONO DISCOUNT Public Works Department 2.35- Total 121050:727.17 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount AMERICAN ENGINEERING TES 05/08/2023 121051 INV-123831 440-48970-304 21-039 NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 2,237.50 Total 121051:2,237.50 ATLANTIS POOLS 05/08/2023 121052 2023.05 ATL 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-000003 325 CREST 1,000.00 Total 121052:1,000.00 BIFFS INC 05/08/2023 121053 W910859 101-43100-415 BRUSH SITE Brush Site 56.17 Total 121053:56.17 BOLTON & MENK INC.05/08/2023 121054 0310242 440-48975-304 21-039 PW FACILITY CONSTRUCTION 334.00 Total 121054:334.00 BOYER TRUCKS INC 05/08/2023 121055 003P38389 701-49800-402 REPLACE LEAF SPRING UNIT 427 962.70 Total 121055:962.70 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 05/08/2023 121056 WO-1239886 101-41900-201 COPY PAPER Central Services 81.31 Total 121056:81.31 CALIBRE PRESS 05/08/2023 121057 2375223 101-42110-437 TRAINING 509 533 537 521 Police Department 796.00 CALIBRE PRESS 05/08/2023 121057 2375224 101-42110-437 TRAINING KIRSCHNER/SHERMAN Police Department 398.00 Total 121057:1,194.00 CARGILL SALT 05/08/2023 121058 2908202018 601-49400-216 SOFTENER SALT 6,059.34 Total 121058:6,059.34 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 05/08/2023 121059 2023.05 140 101-42110-381 GAS SERVICE 04/2023 Police Department 65.81 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 05/08/2023 121059 FINAL BILL 101-42110-381 GAS SERVICES 04/26/2023 Police Department 69.29 Total 121059:135.10 CENTRAL PENSION FUND SOU 05/08/2023 121060 CENTRAL05 101-21705 LOCAL UNION #49 4/17/23-4/30/23 920.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121060:920.50 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/08/2023 121061 0019844 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINT #270 OIL/FILTER CHANGE - BRAK Police Department 255.41 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/08/2023 121061 0019852 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINT #256- RIGHT FRONT TIRE REPAI Police Department 24.38 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/08/2023 121061 0019853 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINT # 255 LEFT TIRE REPAIR Police Department 24.38 Total 121061:304.17 City of Orono Utilities 05/08/2023 121062 2023.04 CH&101-41900-382 APRIL 2023 UB - CH Central Services 88.76 City of Orono Utilities 05/08/2023 121062 2023.04 CH&101-42110-382 APRIL 2023 UB - PD Police Department 88.77 City of Orono Utilities 05/08/2023 121062 2023.04 PO 101-41900-382 APRIL 2023 UB - PO Central Services 86.37 City of Orono Utilities 05/08/2023 121062 2023.04 PW 101-41900-382 APRIL 2023 UB - PW Central Services 199.75 City of Orono Utilities 05/08/2023 121062 2023.04 WT 601-49400-382 APRIL 2023 UB - WTP 156.74 Total 121062:620.39 CITY OF WAYZATA 05/08/2023 121063 APRIL 2023 601-49400-387 APRIL 2023 WATER 2,439.95 CITY OF WAYZATA 05/08/2023 121063 APRIL 2023 602-49450-387 APRIL 2023 SEWER Sewer 5,057.70 Total 121063:7,497.65 City of Wayzata\DMV 05/08/2023 121064 2023.03 #13 701-49800-441 VEHICLE TABS #710 19.25 City of Wayzata\DMV 05/08/2023 121064 2023.03 #36 701-49800-441 VEHICLE TABS #409 19.25 City of Wayzata\DMV 05/08/2023 121064 2023.03 #98 701-49800-441 VEHICLE TABS #428 19.25 Total 121064:57.75 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA 05/08/2023 121065 1166788 101-43000-224 UNTREATED ROAD SALT Public Works Department 2,058.80 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA 05/08/2023 121065 1167276 101-43000-224 UNTREATED ROAD SALT Public Works Department 2,107.88 Total 121065:4,166.68 CORY & ANN MICHAEL KLEINH 05/08/2023 121066 2023.05 KLEI 999-10015 UB REFUND - 108 CHEVY CHASE DR 23.40 Total 121066:23.40 DITTER INC.05/08/2023 121067 i16218 101-41900-404 SPRING AC MAINTENANCE - REPLACED FILTER Central Services 1,285.06 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121067:1,285.06 EBERT INC 05/08/2023 121068 PW PAY AAP 440-48970-520 21-039 NEW PUBLIC WORK FACILITY CONSTRU 610,551.90 EBERT INC 05/08/2023 121068 PW PAY AAP 440-20600 21-039 NEW PUBLIC WORK FACILITY CONSTRU 30,527.61- Total 121068:580,024.29 ECKBERG LAMMERS PC 05/08/2023 121069 A32455 101-42110-437 EVIDENCE MGRS COURSE - BECK Police Department 399.00 Total 121069:399.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 05/08/2023 121070 942769 402-48058-352 23-001 2023 STREETS PROJECT 152.88 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 05/08/2023 121070 944913 101-42400-340 PH FOR JOHNSON/GRANT/HOME Building & Zoning 59.60 Total 121070:212.48 FASTENAL COMPANY 05/08/2023 121071 MNPLY1394 701-49800-215 CREDIT ON HOSE CLAMPS 111.31- FASTENAL COMPANY 05/08/2023 121071 MNPLY1404 101-43000-226 HARD HATS Public Works Department 122.16 Total 121071:10.85 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #25 05/08/2023 121072 0505435 602-49450-489 TV CAMERA REPAIR Sewer 373.42 Total 121072:373.42 G&H Distributing & Supply Inc 05/08/2023 121073 00168433 701-49800-403 HYDRANT HOSE - UNIT 451 96.65 G&H Distributing & Supply Inc 05/08/2023 121073 00168680 602-49450-403 HYDRAULIC HOSE 713 Sewer 441.84 Total 121073:538.49 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 0577-178297 101-42110-402 WHEEL CLEANER Police Department 4.99 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-565780 701-49800-215 SPARE TIRE BRACKET LLFD C1 171.99 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-565787 701-49800-215 BATTERY CHARGER 94.99 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-566473 701-49800-222 SCRAPER 15.80 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-566712 701-49800-215 LAMP GROMMET KIT #426 47.48 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-566868 701-49800-215 BATTERY LLFD U11 306.74 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-566922 701-49800-215 REPAIR PARTS FOR 428 888.19 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-567335 701-49800-222 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR SQUADS 17.98 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/08/2023 121074 3270-567463 701-49800-215 REPAIR PARTS 428 354.28 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121074:1,902.44 GOPHER ACE 05/08/2023 121075 15452 701-49800-212 NON OXY FUEL FOR SMALL ENGINES 207.98 GOPHER ACE 05/08/2023 121075 15475 101-43000-240 WASH BRUSH Public Works Department 39.97 GOPHER ACE 05/08/2023 121075 15530 601-49400-221 BUGGEE CORDS 5.58 Total 121075:253.53 GREG HOGLUND 05/08/2023 121076 2023.05 HO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS22-000163 120 CHEVY 1,000.00 Total 121076:1,000.00 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY 05/08/2023 121077 23-0332 101-42110-402 DOCKING STATION Police Department 740.00 Total 121077:740.00 HAWKINS INC 05/08/2023 121078 6455729 601-49400-216 WATER PLANT CHEMICALS 6,288.44 Total 121078:6,288.44 HAYES & SONS EXC INC 05/08/2023 121079 2023.05 HAY 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - SE22-000011 625 PINEHUR 1,000.00 Total 121079:1,000.00 HOLIDAY COMPANIES 05/08/2023 121080 0796010523 101-42110-402 SQUAD WASHES Police Department 302.50 Total 121080:302.50 IIMC 05/08/2023 121081 2023.04 101-41300-433 IIMC MEMBERSHIP - CARLSON Administration 225.00 Total 121081:225.00 JOHN THIESSE 05/08/2023 121082 2023.05 THI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - 2017-01003/2015-00640 385 2,500.00 Total 121082:2,500.00 JR'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 05/08/2023 121083 109250 603-49500-442 RECYCLING PICK UP 207.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121083:207.00 KIMMEL, ROBERT 05/08/2023 121084 2023.05 KIM 999-10015 UB RFUND - 1448 PARK DR 44.40 Total 121084:44.40 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 05/08/2023 121085 380850 101-41110-437 CITY COUNCIL MEMBER TRAINING - BENSON Mayor & Council 225.00 Total 121085:225.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 101-42110-310 POLICE RECORDS 4/2023 Police Department 8,119.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 710-49970-329 INTERNET 4/2023 600.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 101-41900-221 HOSTED BACKUPS 4/2023 Central Services 1,125.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 710-49970-311 HOSTED SERVERS 4/2023 1,399.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 710-49970-311 HOSTED COMPLIANCE ARCHIVE 4/2023 537.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 710-49970-311 HOSTED WATCHGUARD 4/2023 650.00 LOGIS 05/08/2023 121086 53680 710-49970-401 FIBER SERVICES 4/2023 163.00 Total 121086:12,593.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 05/08/2023 121087 P08986 415-42260-580 PARTS FOR LADDER TRUCK REFURB 5,883.36 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 05/08/2023 121087 P09001 415-42260-580 PART FOR LADDER TRUCK 46.42 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 05/08/2023 121087 W05018 415-42260-580 SERVICE WORK FOR LADDER TRUCK 27,349.13 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC 05/08/2023 121087 W05193 415-42260-580 SERVICE WORK ON LADDER TRUCK 8,178.20 Total 121087:41,457.11 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/08/2023 121088 24180663 101-42110-212 UNLEADED FUEL Police Department 7,182.94 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/08/2023 121088 24213101 101-42110-212 UNLEADED FUEL Police Department 4,721.19 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/08/2023 121088 24213168 701-49800-212 DIESEL FUEL 1,636.36 Total 121088:13,540.49 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI 05/08/2023 121089 0001155868 601-49400-382 DISCHARGE PERMIT 475.00 Total 121089:475.00 MICHAEL BAIRD 05/08/2023 121090 2023.05 BAI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS22-000009 2700 COUN 1,000.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121090:1,000.00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 05/08/2023 121091 20273226 101-42110-221 MEDICAL OXYGEN Police Department 177.98 Total 121091:177.98 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LL 05/08/2023 121092 1075340 602-49450-489 MISSION ANNUAL SERVICE Sewer 5,572.80 Total 121092:5,572.80 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 05/08/2023 121093 8281600573 101-42260-221 APX RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FOR L1 Fire Protection Services 1,710.72 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 05/08/2023 121093 8281601496 415-42260-550 APX RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES L1 23,678.08 Total 121093:25,388.80 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/08/2023 121094 341489 602-49450-489 PVC FITTING Sewer 9.58 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/08/2023 121094 341499 601-49400-489 SPRAY BOTTLES FOR DISINFECTING 8.98 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/08/2023 121094 341500 601-49400-489 PEROXIDE FOR FILTER CLEANING 5.98 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/08/2023 121094 341567 601-49400-489 PH TESTER 23.96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/08/2023 121094 341661 101-42110-201 BATTERIES Police Department 25.96 Total 121094:74.46 Newegg Business Inc 05/08/2023 121095 1304452725 710-49970-575 SQUAD ROOM COMPUTER 499.99 Newegg Business Inc 05/08/2023 121095 1304455032 710-49970-575 LAPTOPS - 3 1,259.97 Total 121095:1,759.96 OHM, SIERRA 05/08/2023 121096 2023.05 OH 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2150 KENWOOD WAY 59.55 Total 121096:59.55 ONLINE SOLUTIONS LLC 05/08/2023 121097 4923 710-49970-416 CITIZEN SERVE LICENSING 3/15/23-03/14/2024 30,600.00 Total 121097:30,600.00 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 05/08/2023 121098 3100383530 101-41900-201 OFFICE/KITCHEN SUPPLIES Central Services 81.83 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121098:81.83 OPTUM 05/08/2023 121099 0001437826 101-41900-319 HSA MAINTENANCE FEE 1ST QTR 2023 Central Services 195.00 Total 121099:195.00 PRESTIGE POOLS 05/08/2023 121100 2023.05 PRE 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS21-000084 3330 WATER 1,000.00 Total 121100:1,000.00 R.D. BULTMAN CONSTRUCTIO 05/08/2023 121101 2023.05 R.D. 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS22-000084 120 CHECY 1,000.00 Total 121101:1,000.00 REUTER, TARYN 05/08/2023 121102 2023.05 REU 999-10015 UB REFUND - 849 BROWN RD N 92.62 Total 121102:92.62 RINNOVARE LLC 05/08/2023 121103 2023.05 RIN 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-000070 4085 WATERT 700.00 Total 121103:700.00 ROBBINS, MARK 05/08/2023 121104 2023.05 ROB 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2875 DEER RUN TRL 78.00 Total 121104:78.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 05/08/2023 121105 475 601-49400-201 INDICIA WINDOW ENVELOPES 139.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 05/08/2023 121105 475 602-49450-201 INDICIA WINDOW ENVELOPES Sewer 139.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 05/08/2023 121105 475 651-49910-201 INDICIA WINDOW ENVELOPES Storm Water 139.00 Total 121105:417.00 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPA 05/08/2023 121106 0589464-IN 101-42110-240 MISC EVIDENCE EQUIP Police Department 236.49 Total 121106:236.49 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628021 101-42110-226 CSO BADGE Police Department 132.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628330 101-42110-226 BADGES Police Department 539.97 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628586 101-42110-226 TIE BAR LYREK UNIFORMS Police Department 15.99 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628587 101-42110-226 PANTS - LYREK UNIFORMS Police Department 59.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628615 101-42110-226 TIE BARS Police Department 31.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/08/2023 121107 1628908 101-42110-226 PANTS - KLUKAS Police Department 59.99 Total 121107:840.91 TIM SMITH 05/08/2023 121108 2023.05 SMI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - SE22-000025 2925 DEER R 1,000.00 Total 121108:1,000.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 05/08/2023 121109 M28192 101-42400-319 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4/19/21 Building & Zoning 279.75 Total 121109:279.75 TONY WITTKE 05/08/2023 121110 2023.05 101-42110-437 TRAINING MEAL REIMBURSEMENT Police Department 44.56 TONY WITTKE 05/08/2023 121110 2023.05 2 101-42110-437 USE OF FORCE TRAINING - LUNCH Police Department 152.70 Total 121110:197.26 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 101-43000-404 RUGS - PW Public Works Department 22.93 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS - PW 6.96 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 602-49450-226 UNIFORMS PW-SEWER DEPT Sewer 50.12 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS - PW Public Works Department 50.13 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 601-49400-226 UNIFORMS PW-WATER DEPT 50.12 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 101-45210-226 UNIFORMS-GOLF COURSE Golf Course 50.12 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/08/2023 121111 090 0762836 101-45200-226 UNIFORMS-PARKS Parks 50.12 Total 121111:280.50 US Bank Equipment Finance 05/08/2023 121112 500254297 710-49970-413 COPIERS 596.76 Total 121112:596.76 Warning Lites of MN 05/08/2023 121113 482 101-43000-224 SIGNS FOR NEW PW WORK SIGHT Public Works Department 649.88 Total 121113:649.88 WEEKLY HOMES LLC 05/08/2023 121114 2023.05 WE 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2410 SOUTH BLOSSOM CIR 110.10 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 121114:110.10 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 05/08/2023 121115 924146 701-49800-215 TIRE REPLACEMENT FOR UNIT 481 158.00 Total 121115:158.00 WILLIAMS TOWING INC 05/08/2023 121116 #23-15025 101-42110-402 UNIT #266 2020 DODGE DURANGO Police Department 213.00 Total 121116:213.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 78.39 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-41900-322 USPS PO CHANGE FOR CITY HALL Central Services 1.10 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-19999 USPS PO CHANGE FOR PD 1.10 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 COFFEE WITH THE MAYOR Mayor & Council 32.79 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 90.28 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 02/22/2023-0 101-19999 USPS PO CHANGE FOR PD 1.10 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 HY-VEE -CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 5.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 POTBELLY -CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 144.52 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41300-489 PAYPAL/BAGY JO -STAFF DEVELOPMENT Administration 37.75 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 SMASHBURGER -CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 149.85 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 HY-VEE -CC MEETING FOOD Mayor & Council 2.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 COBORN'S -COFFEE WITH THE MAYOR Mayor & Council 12.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41300-489 USPS -STAFF DEVELOPMENT Administration 6.58 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41300-489 COBORN'S- STAFF DEVELOPMENT Administration 38.97 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-240 VACUUM/CARPET CLEANER FOR PD Police Department 371.42 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-433 PELETON MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION Police Department 47.32 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 MEALS DURING MN CHIEFS Police Department 22.60 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 MEALS DURING MN CHIEFS Police Department 88.83 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 HOTEL -MN CHIEFS Police Department 600.90 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 HOTEL -MN CHIEFS Police Department 780.20 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41110-439 MEETING -FOOD EXPENSE Mayor & Council 38.07 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 HARD DRIVE ADAPTER 18.79 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 PD PRINTER 212.89 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 CONFERENCE ROOM - AV 355.85 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 PORT REPLICATOR 303.43 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-221 IPHONE CASES Police Department 371.79 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 USB CABLE - CONFERENCE RM 16.11 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41900-221 PHONE CASES - CITY Central Services 75.19 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-41900-221 PHONE CASES - PD Central Services 354.68 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 4/25/2023 - 5/8/2023 May 04, 2023 02:38PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 AMAZON CREDIT 347.13- CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 710-49970-221 AMAZON CREDIT 18.27- CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 601-49400-405 HENNEPIN CTY -COFFEE BRIDGE WATER MAIN 340.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 TRAINING 509 539 Police Department 220.74 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/2023-0 101-42110-437 TRAINING 512 518 UAV Police Department 350.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/23-04/601-49400-322 UB ENVELOPES - INDICIA 157.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/23-04/602-49450-322 UB ENVELOPES - INDICIA Sewer 157.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/08/2023 201303 03/22/23-04/651-49910-322 UB ENVELOPES - INDICIA Storm Water 157.00 Total 20130349:5,278.81 MEDSURETY LLC 05/08/2023 201303 23050 101-41900-319 VEBA/FSA/COBRA HSA FEES 5/23 Central Services 212.50 Total 20130350:212.50 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL- SAC 05/08/2023 201303 2023.03 SAC 101-20809 SAC 03/2023 7,455.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL- SAC 05/08/2023 201303 2023.03 SAC 101-39610 SAC 03/2023 74.55- Total 20130351:7,380.45 Grand Totals: 778,773.70 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve two new Garbage Hauler Licenses. 2. License Applicant(s) Name Address License # Period Waste Management 490 Industrial Blvd., Winsted, MN 55395 GH23-000001 06/01//2023 – 05/31/2024 Curbside Waste Inc. 4025 85th Ave. Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 GH23-000002 06/01//2023 – 05/31/2024 Veit Container Corp DBA Veit Disposal Systems 21075 134th Ave N Rogers, MN 55374 GH23-000003 06/01//2023 – 05/31/2024 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Garbage Hauler licenses listed above. The License Applicants have submitted all of the requested documents and have met all requirements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Garbage Hauler licenses listed above. Item No.: 4 Date: May 23, 2022 Item Description: Approval of Garbage Hauler Licenses Presenter: Anna Carlson City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve Rental Licenses. 2. License Applicant(s) Name Address License # Period Lori Zappa 3670 Togo Road RL23-000004 01/01/2023-12/31/2024 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Rental license listed above. The License Applicant has submitted all of the requested documents and has met all requirements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the rental license listed above. Item No.: 5 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Approval of Rental License Presenter: Anna Carlson City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: CF Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to promote a Police Deputy Chief. 2. Background. The Police Department is seeking to fill a vacancy for Police Deputy Chief. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the position involved supervisor screening within the department and an interview with the Chief of Police. 4. Recommended Candidate. I recommend to promote Tony Wittke to the Deputy Chief Position. Tony Wittke has more than 26 years of service with the Orono Police Department and has been a Sergeant for nearly 16 years. 5. Recommended Compensation. Tony Wittke be appointed as Police Deputy Chief with an effective date of May 29, 2023. a. Salary. Starting rate of $56.02/hour (Grade 15, Step 6 of the Non-Union employee pay scale) + Longevity Pay b. Benefits. Includes a vehicle for business use to respond to call and incidents 24/7. All other benefits to continue at current rates. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the promotion of Tony Wittke as a Police Deputy Chief at the rate of $56.02 per hour with a start date of May 29, 2023. Item No.: 6 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Authorization to Promote Tony Wittke - Police Deputy Chief Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: CF Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to promote a police sergeant. 2. Background. The Police Department is seeking to fill 1 vacancy as police sergeant. The vacancy is a result of the promotion of Tony Wittke to Deputy Chief. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the position involved application screening, and interviews. Interviews were completed by a panel of currently serving supervisors and an outside the department interview panel that includes community business professionals. 4. Recommended Candidate. Ryan Spencer was the top choice by both interview panels. Ryan Spencer has more than 10 years of service with the Orono Police Department and more than 17 years as a police officer. 5. Recommended Compensation. I recommend to promote Ryan Spencer as a police sergeant with an effective start date of May 29, 2023. a. Salary. Starting rate of $51.99/hour step 4 (LELS Local 168 Agreement pay scale). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the promotion of Ryan Spencer as a police sergeant at the rate of $51.99 per hour with a start date of May 29, 2023. Item No.: 7 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Authorization to Promote Ryan Spencer – Police Sergeant Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: CF Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to accept the resignation of a part-time CSO (Cadet). 2. Background. The Police Department has received notice from part-time CSO(Cadet) Hunter Buchanan that he will no longer be working at the Orono Police Department. 3. Recommended Candidate. Hunter Buchanan was hired as a part-time CSO(Cadet) on January 17, 2023. Hunter has been hired by the South Lake Police Department as a CSO and has accepted a conditional job as a police officer as well in August. 4. Staff Recommended. I recommend accepting the resignation of Hunter Buchanan as a part-time CSO (Cadet) effective April 30, 2023. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept resignation of Hunter Buchanan as a part-time CSO (Cadet) effective April 30, 2023. Item No.: 8 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Accept Resignation of Hunter Buchanan – Part-Time CSO (Cadet) Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: CF Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to gain approval accepting Deputy Chief Chris Fischer’s letter of resignation. 2. Background / Summary. Chris Fischer started as a Police Reserve with the Orono Police Department in December 1989. On April 4, 1995 Fischer was promoted to Community Service Officer. On February 23, 1998, Fischer was appointed to a part-time Police Officer and a full-time Police Officer on June 8, 1998. On January 3, 2005 Fischer was promoted to Police Sergeant. On January 1, 2013 Chris Fischer was promoted to Deputy Chief. Fischer was active in community organization including Orono Rotary, WeCan, WCC and many more civic organizations. The Police Department and City of Orono wishes Chris Fischer the best of luck in all of his future endeavors and for his service to the citizens of Orono, Mound, Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach. Best wishes in your retirement and thank you for being a part of this organization for more than 30 years. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend accepting the resignation of Deputy Chief Chris Fischer effective May 28, 2023 and approving the attached resolution of appreciation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the resignation of Deputy Chris Fischer effective May 28, 2023 and Resolution No. 7360. Exhibits 1. Resolution Item No.: 9 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Authorization to Accept Resignation of Chris Fischer – Resolution 7360 Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7360 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING DEPUTY CHIEF CHRIS FISCHER FOR HIS TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY AS A POLICE OFFICER WHEREAS, Chris Fischer was hired as a police reserve in December 1989; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer was hired as a Community Service Officer on April 4, 1995; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer was promoted to part-time Police Officer on February 23, 1998 and full time Police Officer on June 8, 1998; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer was promoted to Police Sergeant on January 3, 2005; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer was promoted to police Deputy Chief on January 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, his 33 years of service as a Reserve, Community Service Officer, Police Officer, Sergeant and Deputy Chief has been characterized by his dedication to providing the highest quality police service to the city and its citizens; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer has provided service to the community in a fair, respectful, honest, trustworthy, and selfless manner; and WHEREAS, Chris Fischer is resigning from his position as Deputy Chief effective May 28, 2023; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does hereby recognize and commend Deputy Chief Chris Fischer for his leadership, and dedicated service to the community as a Police Officer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby extend its best wishes to Deputy Chief Chris Fischer. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of May, 2023. CITY OF ORONO By: _______________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: CF Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to seek approval for a wage adjustment for select police officers in LELS Local 40. 2. Background / Summary. Recently LELS Local 40 approved a three-year contract (2023,2024,2025). Changes in the new contract raised the starting pay to levels that were competitive with other departments starting salaries. In 2023 two officers have been hired under the new contract and these two officers are at a pay scale higher than those that were hired in 2022. The market is very competitive and adjusting/increase those three officers by one step would bring their compensation similar to those that were hired under current contract. 3. Wage Adjustment. Officer Current Wage/Adjusted Wage Brayden Sherman $35.02 Start/$37.08 Step 1 Cory Slikpa $35.02 Start/$37.08 Step 1 Trent Wiebusch 37.08 Step 1/ 40.46 Step 2 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends a wage adjustment of one step increase for Officers Brayden Sherman, Cory Slipka and Trent Wiebusch. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve wage adjustment for Officer Brayden Sherman to $37.08, Officer Cory Slipka to $37.08 and Officer Trent Wiebusch to $40.46 effective May 15, 2023 Item No.: 10 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Approval of Wage Adjustment for LELS Local 40 Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to award the contract for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project (23-001). 2. Background. At the April 10th, 2022 Council Work Session, the Council provided direction for 2023 street projects. The streets identified for 2023 are Fox Street (Brown to Orono Orchard) and Townline Road. Townline Road is being resurfaced as a joint project with Independence and Medina. Staff received bids for the Fox street project on May 3rd. 3. Scope of Work. The project consists of the reclamation and mill and overlay of the bituminous pavement, select subgrade corrections, and the replacement / improvement of the associated stormwater systems for Fox Street between Orono Orchard Road and Brown Road. 4. Cost. The city received seven bids. The Bid Summary is at Exhibit A. The low bid for $268,261 is from Bituminous Roadways. In addition to the construction cost, Bolton and Menk provided a proposal of NTE $35,000 for construction oversight. (Exhibit B) Who Work Cost Status Bolton &Menk 2023 Streets Design and Bid Engineering $62,300.00 Previously approved Astech Corp Construction $268,261 Pending award Bolton &Menk Construction Oversight $35,000.00 Not to exceed TOTAL $365,561.00 5. Funding. Funding for the project will come from a combination of the pavement management fund, stormwater fund, water fund, and sewer fund. Fund As bid Est. 2023 End of Year Fund Balance Pavement Fund $359,705.00 $417,106 Stormwater Fund $5856.00 $1,838,546 Total $1,009,287.40 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend award of the bid to Bituminous Roadways in the amount of $268,261 and approval of the proposal form Bolton and Menk for construction services. Note the cost associated with this project are significantly less that projected. During the design process the geotechnical analysis eliminated the need for the light weight fill we had thought would be required for the project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to award the 2023 Streets project to Bituminous Roadways for $268,261 and to authorize Bolton & Menk to perform construction oversite for a fee not to exceed $35,000. Reference A. Bid Tab B. Bolton and Menk Construction Services Proposal Item No.: 11 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: 2023 Street Maintenance Project (23-001) – Award Presenter: Adam Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A- Bid Tab City Of Orono 2023 Street Improvements Bid Date: 3 May 2023 Contractor Bid Bituminous Roadways $268,261.00 Asphalt Surface Technologies $286,676.30 Northwest Asphalt $288,388.61 GMH Asphalt $299,362.15 Valley Paving $332,523.50 Park Construction $333,818.50 New Look Contracting $348,605.00 H:\ORNO\$2023 New Projects\Fee Estimate - 2023 Fox Street Construction Services.docx May 3, 2023 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: 2023 Fox Street Improvements – Construction Services Dear Adam: As requested, we have prepared a scope of services and estimated fee for the construction services associated with the 2023 Fox Street Improvements Project. Scope of Services Public Coordination/Communications Bolton & Menk is committed to supporting the coordination requirements of this project with qualified staff and will proactively engage affected property owners and the public with timely and accurate information via newsletters and website updates as desired by the City. Construction Staking and Observation Construction staking will be provided along with full-time construction observation (45 hours per week for 6 weeks). Duties of the Construction Observer will include the following: • Attendance at the pre-construction meeting and all construction-related meetings • Serve as a liaison between the city and the contractor • Review of the completed work to determine if the project is in general conformance with the plans and specifications • Review of all materials testing • Maintenance of construction documentation • Communication with affected property owners, as necessary, to address their construction- related concerns and issues Construction Administration Construction administration duties will include the following: • Administering a pre-construction meeting and weekly construction meetings • Review of shop drawings • Preparation of pay estimates • Contractor Communications • Liaison with City Staff and Council Record drawings detailing the completed improvements as recorded by the construction observer and the City of Orono’s contractor will be completed and furnished to the city in hard copy and electronic 2023 Fox Street May 3, 2023 Page 2 H:\ORNO\$2023 New Projects\Fee Estimate - 2023 Fox Street Construction Services.docx format. Record plans will also be linked to the city mapping system and the City’s GIS system will be updated. Fee Estimate Based on the scope of services described above, and unused design fees previously approved, we propose an additional fee of $35,000 to be billed on an hourly basis. Additional services that may be required after the contract’s substantial completion date for the project will be billed on an hourly basis. A separate proposal for materials testing services will be submitted to the city for review. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Principal Engineer AGENDA ITEM 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the installation of new watermain at the Coffee Bridge. 2. Background / Summary. On April 13, 2023 the utilities crew attempted to repair a watermain break at the Coffee Bridge. Through that work we discovered the break is on a section of pipe under the channel putting it in a place that is unsafe to attempt to fix. Staff developed a plan to replace the section of watermain by boring in a new pipe under the channel. 3. Cost. The city solicited quotes. Listed below. Company Cost Geislinger and Sons - bypass watermain and install new $ 191,000.00 Valley Rich bypass and install new $ 119,650.00 4. Funding. This project will be funded through the Water Enterprise Fund. The projected end of year balance for this fund is $102,642.00. 5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval of the by-pass and watermain installation project by Valley Rich Companies for $119,650.00. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept the quote for bypass water and watermain install from Valley Rich Companies for $119,650.00 and to install a bypass and watermain installation at the Coffee Bridge. Prepared By: DJG Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: Item No.: 12 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Emergency Watermain Bypass and New Watermain Installation at the Coffee Bridge Presenter: D.J. Goman Public Works Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding vacation of portions of unused rights-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive and 1475 Shoreline Drive which terminate at or about the ordinary high-water level (OHWL). 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and considered to be complete on February 14th, 2023. The 60-Day review period has been extended to allow for DNR notification and will expire on June 14th, 2023. 3. Background/ Summary. In 2020, Hennepin County began a road project on CSAH 15 / Shoreline Drive which included realignment of the roadway and reconstruction of the Tanager Bridge. As part of the project, land from the abutting properties at 1449 and 1475 Shoreline Drive adjacent to the Tanager Bridge was required. With the realignment of the bridge, portions of the existing CSAH 15 right-of-way were no longer needed to support the road improvements. The City Council in 2020 passed Resolution No. 7098 (Exhibit C) confirming that when the portions of land previously underlying CSAH were no longer serving a public purpose and would be vacated upon project completion. Hennepin County completed the road project to realign CSAH 15 and the Tanager Bridge in 2022; the County has transferred the land to the City of Orono in order for the vacation process to occur. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has reviewed and supports the vacation request (Exhibit D). The City is not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements. Private utility companies have also been notified of the application. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17, 2023 the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the vacation of the unused right-of-way. 5. Public Comment. One public comment was submitted by an abutting property owner in support of the application. The draft planning commission minutes are attached as Exhibit E. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of the unused rights-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive and 1475 Shoreline Drive. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the drafted approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Vacation C. Resolution No. 7098 D. DNR Notification & Response E. Draft PC Minutes 4/17/2023 F. PC Staff Report 4/17/2023 References PC Exhibits of 04/17/2023 Item No.: 13 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000002 – 1449 and 1475 Shoreline Drive, Vacation – Resolution No. 7361 Presenter: Laura Oakden Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda 223254v1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7361 A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City of Orono, (the “City”) has jurisdiction over the public right-of-way proposed to be vacated as described in attached Exhibits A and B and depicted on Exhibit C (hereinafter the “Rights-of-Way”); and WHEREAS, RLA Family LP at 1449 Shoreline Drive; PID 11-117-23-21-0001, and Ellen Schmitt, at 1475 Shoreline Drive; PID 11-117-23-23-0002, (collectively the “Owners”) each own land abutting the Rights-of-Way; and WHEREAS, during 2020 - 2022 Hennepin County conducted a road reconstruction project to realign the Tanager Bridge and CSAH 15. Following the realignment, it was determined that portions of the remaining rights-of-way would no longer be needed to serve the roadway; and WHEREAS, in 2020, the City passed Resolution No. 7098 supporting the need to vacated the unused Rights-of-Way following completion of the County’s project. WHEREAS, following project completion in 2022, Hennepin County transferred the Deeds for the Right-of-Way to the City; and WHEREAS, the City has initiated the process to vacate of the Right-of-Way; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council finds that the existing Rights-of-way have no apparent present or future benefit to the public; and WHEREAS, there are no public utilities located within the Rights-of-Way; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of the proposed vacation was submitted to the Commissioner of the DNR by certified mail for their comment on February 15 2023; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of a public hearing on the vacation of the Rights-of-Way was published in the Laker Pioneer Newspaper on April 1, 2023; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was also posted at the Long Lake and Crystal Bay Post Offices on April 1, 2023; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was mailed to the Owners affected by the proposed vacation on March 31, 2023, and 223254v1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7361 WHEREAS, the Orono Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested parties regarding the vacation of Rights-of-Way at a public hearing opened on April 17, 2023 in the City of Orono City Council Chambers; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, makes the following findings: FINDINGS 1. The proposed vacation of the Rights-of-Way does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. No access to adjacent or nearby properties will be limited by the vacation. 2. The City does not intend to develop, improve, or use the Rights-of-Way for road or lake access purposes. 3. The unimproved subject Rights-of-Way, as they exist, serve no public purpose. 4. For the foregoing reasons, it is in the public interest to vacate only the Rights-of-Way as described and depicted on the attached Exhibits A, B, and C. DECISION NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the Rights-of-Way legally described and depicted in Exhibits A, B, and C are hereby vacated. 2. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 412.851, the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 2023. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 223254v1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7361 EXHIBIT A: Description of the Right-of-Way to be Vacated That part of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 in Government Lot 2, Section 11, Township 117, Range 23 which lies northerly of the channel shown on HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 and southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of Match Line No. 8 on HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 on Sheet 5 of 7 Sheets and the east line of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE A!D HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51; thence southwesterly along said east line of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 on an assumed bearing of South 38 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 68.14 feet; thence North 31 degrees 55 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 128.29 feet; thence North 34 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 138.74 feet; thence North 25 degrees 29 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 152.96 feet; thence North 18 degrees 31 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 27. 17 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 25 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 90.00 feet; thence North 64 degrees 34 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 11.37 feet; thence North 25 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 294.52 feet to the east line of HENNEPIN COUNTY STA TE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 and said line there terminating. 223254v1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7361 Exhibit B: Description of the Right-of-Way to be Vacated That part of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 in Government Lot 2, Section 11, Township 117, Range 23 which lies southerly of the channel shown on HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 and southeasterly of the following described line and its northeasterly extension; Commencing at the intersection of Match line No. 8 on HENNEPIN COUNTY STA TE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 on Sheet 5 of 7 Sheets and the east line of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE A!D HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51; thence southwesterly along said east line of HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, PLAT 51 on an assumed bearing of South 38 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 68.14 feet to the point of beginning of the Hne to be described; thence North 31 degrees 55 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 128.29 feet; thence North 34 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 138.74 feet; thence North 25 degrees 29 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 152.96 feet more or less to the southerly line of said channel and said line terminating. 223254v1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7361 Exhibit C: Depiction of the Proposed Vacation PID: 1111723230002ELLEN A SCHMITT1475 SHORELINE DRIVE,ORONO , MN 55391PID: 1111723210001RLA FAMILY LP1449 SHORELINE DRIVE,ORONO, MNPID: 1111723210001 - RLA FAMILY LP1449 SHORELINE DRIVE, ORONO, MNBRIDGEFIELD BOOK:DRAWN BY:JOB NUMBER: FOR: R HCSAH NO. 15 STREET VACATION EXHIBIT SEC. 11, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN CITY OF ORONO 0C1.129612 ARK 2638 SHADOW LANE SUITE 200 CHASKA, MN 55318 (952) 448-8838 R SCALE IN FEET 0 150 H:\ORNO\0C1129612\CAD\C3D\129612_EASE_E1.dwg 2/15/2023 8:10 AM©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reserved PER QCD DOC. NO. 11119999 SHORELINE DR.(H.C.S.A.H.15)TANAGER LAKE LAKE MINNETONKA TAN A G E R C H A N N E L PROPOSED STREET VACATION AREA = 10,141 +/- SQ FT PID: 1111723230017 CHRISTOPHER G WILSON (UNASSIGNED ADDRESS) LOT LINES PROPOSED STREET VACATION RIGHT OF WAY LEGEND EXISTING RE-ALIGNED ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY PER DOC. NO. 5740872 UNDERLYING RIGHT OF WAY GREEN TREESRD. RIGHT OF WAY PER DOC. NO. 5740872 ORDINARY HIGH WATER 929.4 NGVD29 PROPOSED STREET VACATION AREA = 6,658 +/- SQ FT PER QCD DOC. NO. 11119999 H.C.S.A.H. NO. 15, PLAT 51 PID: 1111723230002ELLEN A SCHMITT1475 SHORELINE DRIVE,ORONO , MN 55391PID: 1111723210001RLA FAMILY LP1449 SHORELINE DRIVE,ORONO, MNPID: 1111723210001 - RLA FAMILY LP1449 SHORELINE DRIVE, ORONO, MNBRIDGEFIELD BOOK:DRAWN BY:JOB NUMBER: FOR: R HCSAH NO. 15 STREET VACATION EXHIBIT SEC. 11, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN CITY OF ORONO 0C1.129612 ARK 2638 SHADOW LANE SUITE 200 CHASKA, MN 55318 (952) 448-8838 R SCALE IN FEET 0 150 H:\ORNO\0C1129612\CAD\C3D\129612_EASE_E1.dwg 2/15/2023 8:10 AM©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reserved PER QCD DOC. NO. 11119999 SHORELINE DR.(H.C.S.A.H.15)TANAGER LAKE LAKE MINNETONKA TAN A G E R C H A N N E L PROPOSED STREET VACATION AREA = 10,141 +/- SQ FT PID: 1111723230017 CHRISTOPHER G WILSON (UNASSIGNED ADDRESS) LOT LINES PROPOSED STREET VACATION RIGHT OF WAY LEGEND EXISTING RE-ALIGNED ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY PER DOC. NO. 5740872 UNDERLYING RIGHT OF WAY GREEN TREESRD. RIGHT OF WAY PER DOC. NO. 5740872 ORDINARY HIGH WATER 929.4 NGVD29 PROPOSED STREET VACATION AREA = 6,658 +/- SQ FT PER QCD DOC. NO. 11119999 H.C.S.A.H. NO. 15, PLAT 51 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7098 4kESHO A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REALIGNMENT OF COUNTY ROAD 15 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS,the County Road 15 is owned and operated by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the section of County Road 15 near Tanager Lake will be realigned and the property it is currently on will, in part,no longer be needed for the road; and WHEREAS, by law, when the new road is open for travel,property on which the County road existed, but is no longer needed for transportation purposes, becomes property of the City by a function of law. Minn. Stat. § 162.02 subd. 7; Minn. Stat. § 160.09 sub.1; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after reviewing the County's plans for realignment, finds that there is no public use or benefit for this parcel of land; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota as follows: At such time when the project is completed and the County relinquishes unused portions of County Road 15 to the City, the City will vacate the land pursuant Minn. Stat. 412.851. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the city Council of the City of Orono by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 against, on this a 4,day of /4ay ?per . ATTEST: Anna Carlon, City erk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 1 of 2 209538v1 4-zL.. /v-0 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL yA. NO. 7098 kEsxo` EXHIBIT A Insert depiction Page 2 of 2 209538v1 7098 mit. TANAGER LAKE mot x 0c)0 ttilli C''':J.,,,....L P 4; r av.,. ' 1'7' r CONSTRUCTION.LIMIT ' 0 50 100 r Is mssa f SCALE FEET a f r y. PARCEL LINE r' 1 oi.( 4,": 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE f eta y vi 0 Fi 3•', • v 4 tc o x ate,.....- XIST.CSAH 15iE a rte r 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE oi li: ,,,,,f.....:.4,::,' awe W*1"" misro"**- 4, , g ' — Eir. oD U a:qmil LD.m U' V PARCEL LINE LEGEND PERMANENT HIGHWAY EA:M:: EMENT mm AREA = 17,825 SQ FT TAREMPORARY EA = 1 ,730 SQ FT AREAPERMANENT4665UTILITY SOFT EASEMENT o0 N Torv,. ATOPOPERMANENTTUTILITY EASEMENT BROWNS BAY AREA = 4,495 SO FT N E L_ x IRNIOWNER: Pe Drive CITY: Orono, MN PARCEL 2 ADDRESS: 1449RLAFamily ShorelinFigure Jo1152 . CSAH 15 PD2CountyProj. CP 1634 411b9# 2020300 RID: 11-117-23-21-0001 State Proj. SP 027-615-025 SENT VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL: 7015 1520 0000 3576 3144 Sarah Strommen Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 Ms. Strommen: RE: Proposed Vacation of right-of-way adjacent to 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID: 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002 in Orono. File: #LA23-000002 - Republished with amended attachements The City of Orono has been requested to vacate a right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002, which terminate at or about the OHWL; as depicted in the enclosed documents. Hennepin County completed a road project which realigned CSAH 15 and the Tanager bridge. The existing CSAH 15 right of way is no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transfered this space to the City of Orono. We are not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements; however, we request your confirmation of this. Enclosed are copies of the proposed site plan. Please advise whether you have any objections to vacation of the areas shown. This item will be presented on the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting agenda for a public hearing. Receipt of your comments by or before Monday, April 10th would be appreciated. Please contact me directly at loakden@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4602 for more information of if you have any questions. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Laura Oakden Community Development Director c: via email February 15, 2023 February 27, 2023 Chuck Mayers CenterPoint Energy PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Proposed Vacation of right-of-way adjacent to 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID: 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002 in Orono. File: #LA23-000002 - Republished with amended attachments The City of Orono has been requested to vacate a right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-21- 0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002, which terminate at or about the OHWL; as depicted in the enclosed documents. Hennepin County completed a road project which realigned CSAH 15 and the Tanager bridge. The existing CSAH 15 right of way is no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred this space to the City of Orono. We are not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements; however, we request your confirmation of this. Enclosed are copies of the proposed site plan. Please advise whether you have any objections to vacation of the areas shown. This item will be presented on the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting agenda for a public hearing. Receipt of your comments by or before Monday, April 10th would be appreciated. Please contact me directly at loakden@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4602 for more information of if you have any questions. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Laura Oakden Community Development Director Enclosures c: via email 1 Laura Oakden From:Mayers, Charles J <charles.mayers@CenterpointEnergy.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 28, 2023 6:22 AM To:Laura Oakden; Katie Fitzsimmons Cc:Mayers, Charles J; Jacks, Paul X Subject:FW: [External Email] Proposed Vacation of right-of-way in Orono Attachments:CenterPoint.pdf Hi Laura and Paul    Thank you for the follow‐up, Laura; I will check with Paul in Engineering and see if we did move this gas main last year; I  will get back to you ASAP.    Paul, can you check and get back to us to see if we were a part of this realignment in 2020‐2022?  If we did move, IM  sure the vacation would be just fine, but let's talk first to make sure; thanks, Paul.    Have a great safe day, Laura.    Chuck Mayers      Chuck Mayers SR/WA  Senior Agent, Right of Way   System Integrity & Operation Support  612‐321‐5381 w. | 952‐334‐9180 c.  Charles.mayers@centerpointenergy.com                From: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us>   Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 3:50 PM  To: Mayers, Charles J <charles.mayers@CenterpointEnergy.com>  Cc: Katie Fitzsimmons <kfitzsimmons@ci.orono.mn.us>  Subject: RE: [External Email] Proposed Vacation of right‐of‐way in Orono    Hi Chuck,    Thanks for following up.  I am handling the vacation application through the city process.  It is my understanding that  Tanager Bridge reconstruction was done by Hennepin County required the road to be realigned in 2020‐2022.  I believe  CPE was involved and aware of that county project.  I think it would be a good idea to verify if your GIS still accurately  reflects the location of your improvements since this project just finished up last year.  Many private utilities that were  involved moved there infrastructure to accommodate the project.     Give me a call if you was to discuss the project further.      You don't often get email from loakden@ci.orono.mn.us.  Learn why this is important   2 Thanks!    Laura Oakden  Community Development Director  City of Orono  Direct 952.249.4602  2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356  www.ci.orono.mn.us    All Permitting is done through our new online portal LINK!      From: Katie Fitzsimmons <kfitzsimmons@ci.orono.mn.us>   Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 12:32 PM  To: Mayers, Charles J <charles.mayers@CenterpointEnergy.com>  Subject: [External Email] Proposed Vacation of right‐of‐way in Orono      EXTERNAL EMAIL     | CAUTION: This message originated from outside CenterPoint Energy. Do not click on links, open attachments, or enter  data unless you recognize the sender, were expecting the content and know it to be safe.   Good afternoon Chuck,     Please see the attached letter and enclosures regarding a proposed vacation request in Orono. Please reach out with  any questions or comments. The attached has also been mailed to you.    Thanks!  Katie      Katie Fitzsimmons  Planning Assistant  Direct: 952.249.4620  2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356  www.ci.orono.mn.us    All permitting can be done through the city’s online portal, here.          ***** This email is from an external sender outside of the CenterPoint Energy network.  Be cautious about clicking links  or opening attachments from unknown sources. *****   From:Easement, Nre To:Katie Fitzsimmons Cc:Bolden, Franklin Subject:RE: P845742/Proposed Vacation of right-of-way in Orono Date:Monday, February 27, 2023 1:29:55 PM Attachments:image001.png Good afternoon. We have received your request for a Vacate-Abandon and have set up a CenturyLink project accordingly. Your project number is P845742 and it should be referenced in all emails sent in for review. Please do not reply to this email. Your project owner is Franklin Bolden and they can be reached by email at Franklin.Bolden@lumen.com with any questions that you may have regarding this project. Requests are addressed in the order received, CenturyLink will endeavor to respond within 30 days. Have a great day! Best Regards, Eryn Ogden Faulk & Foster 1811 Auburn Ave, Monroe, LA 71201 Eryn.Ogden@lumen.com Our fee policy applies to CenturyLink dedicated easements only. If your request involves public ROW or a Public Utility easement, the fee does not apply. If this is the case, please reply all to advise. From: Katie Fitzsimmons <kfitzsimmons@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 11:18 AM To: Easement, Nre <nre.easement@centurylink.com> Subject: P845742/Proposed Vacation of right-of-way in Orono Good morning! Please see the attached letter and enclosures regarding a proposed vacation request in Orono. Please reach out with any questions or comments. Thanks! Katie Katie Fitzsimmons Planning Assistant Direct: 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting can be done through the city’s online portal, here. This communication is the property of Lumen Technologies and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. February 27, 2023 Sean W. Lawler Land Rights Agent Xcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall (MP-8A) Minneapolis, MN 55401 RE: Proposed Vacation of right-of-way adjacent to 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID: 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002 in Orono. File: #LA23-000002 - Republished with amended attachments The City of Orono has been requested to vacate a right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-21- 0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002, which terminate at or about the OHWL; as depicted in the enclosed documents. Hennepin County completed a road project which realigned CSAH 15 and the Tanager bridge. The existing CSAH 15 right of way is no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred this space to the City of Orono. We are not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements; however, we request your confirmation of this. Enclosed are copies of the proposed site plan. Please advise whether you have any objections to vacation of the areas shown. This item will be presented on the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting agenda for a public hearing. Receipt of your comments by or before Monday, April 10th would be appreciated. Please contact me directly at loakden@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4602 for more information of if you have any questions. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Laura Oakden Community Development Director Enclosures c: via email February 27, 2023 Xcel Energy Attn: Mason Padilla 414 Nicollet Mall (MP-8A) Minneapolis, MN 55401 RE: Proposed Vacation of right-of-way adjacent to 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID: 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002 in Orono. File: #LA23-000002 - Republished with amended attachments The City of Orono has been requested to vacate a right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-21- 0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002, which terminate at or about the OHWL; as depicted in the enclosed documents. Hennepin County completed a road project which realigned CSAH 15 and the Tanager bridge. The existing CSAH 15 right of way is no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred this space to the City of Orono. We are not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements; however, we request your confirmation of this. Enclosed are copies of the proposed site plan. Please advise whether you have any objections to vacation of the areas shown. This item will be presented on the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting agenda for a public hearing. Receipt of your comments by or before Monday, April 10th would be appreciated. Please contact me directly at loakden@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4602 for more information of if you have any questions. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Laura Oakden Community Development Director Enclosures c: via email From:Haydock, Emma G To:Katie Fitzsimmons Subject:Proposed Vacation of right-of-way in Orono Date:Friday, March 24, 2023 9:34:28 AM Attachments:XcelLawler.pdf Hello, Xcel found that the facilities that fall within the land-to-be-vacated directly serve 1475, so we do not see any issue with the vacation and can support it. Thanks, Emma Haydock Xcel Energy Intern - Siting & Land Rights 414 Nicollet Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55401 E: emma.g.haydock@xcelenergy.com February 27, 2023 Robert Craig Mediacom 1670 Lake Drive W Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Proposed Vacation of right-of-way adjacent to 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID: 11-117-23-21-0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002 in Orono. File: #LA23-000002 - Republished with amended attachments The City of Orono has been requested to vacate a right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-21- 0001, and 1475 Shoreline Drive, PID 11-117-23-23-0002, which terminate at or about the OHWL; as depicted in the enclosed documents. Hennepin County completed a road project which realigned CSAH 15 and the Tanager bridge. The existing CSAH 15 right of way is no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred this space to the City of Orono. We are not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements; however, we request your confirmation of this. Enclosed are copies of the proposed site plan. Please advise whether you have any objections to vacation of the areas shown. This item will be presented on the April 17, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting agenda for a public hearing. Receipt of your comments by or before Monday, April 10th would be appreciated. Please contact me directly at loakden@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4602 for more information of if you have any questions. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Laura Oakden Community Development Director Enclosures c: via email DraftMINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. LA23-000002 CITY OF ORONO, 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE AND 1475 SHORELINE DRIVE, VACATION Oakden said this application is to vacate unused right-of-way along County Rd. 15. The City of Orono is requesting to vacate portions of right-of-way. Hennepin County conducted a project and obtained rights- of-way to reconstruct Tanager Bridge. Portions of that right-of-way are no longer needed to support the road improvement. The County has transferred the property to the City for the purpose of vacating which is standard vacation process. The land does not serve a public purpose and has no use for City services. Staff is recommending approval. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Richie Anderson, 1449 Shoreline Dr., stated his agreement with the County was, any property the County took on one side, he would get back on the other side, which is the space we are talking about now. I’ve been waiting since 2020 to get this resolved. I didn’t hold them up on price and gave them more property than needed and I’ve been paying an attorney to get this done. You are not giving us something we did not have an agreement to get. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Libby commented that he had worked closely with the County and a different property owner regarding right-of-way acquisition for this road project. I was very aware of two precedents at that time. When there is a vacation like this, if the County decides it no longer has a use for a property it must pass through ownership of the City before goes to an adjoining property owner for first right of refusal, which is another precedent. At this point all we are really deciding is whether we are advising Council to approve vacation. I am supportive. Kirchner supports the application. Erickson noted from a motorist and resident standpoint it is a tremendous improvement over what was there before. He appreciates the efforts of the property owner and the county and City staff and everyone working together to come up with a finished product that's top quality. McCutchen moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000002, 1449 Shoreline Drive, Vacation. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: April 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000002, 1449 and 1475 Shoreline Drive, Vacation Public Hearing Background The City of Orono has been requested to vacate portions of right-of-way abutting 1449 Shoreline Drive (PID 11-117-23-21-0001) and 1475 Shoreline Drive (PID 11-117-23-23-0002) which terminate at or about the ordinary high water level (OHWL). In 2020, Hennepin County conducted a road project at County Road 15 and a reconstruction project of the Tanager Bridge. As part of that project, land from the abutting properties at 1449 and 1475 Shoreline Drive adjacent to the Tanager bridge was required. With the realignment of the bridge, portions of the existing CSAH 15 right-of-way are no longer needed to support the road improvements. The City Council in 2020 passed Resolution No. 7098 (Exhibit G,) confirming that unused land would be vacated. Hennepin County completed the road project which realigned County Road 15 and the Tanager bridge in 2022 and the County has transferred the land to the City of Orono in order for the vacation process to occur. The City is not aware of any utilities located within the existing right-of-way/easements. We have notified private utilities of the application. Applicable Regulations:  MN State Statute 412.851 VACATION OF STREETS The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four-fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice. The council shall cause written notice of the hearing to be mailed to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation at least ten days before the hearing. The notice must contain, at minimum, a copy of the petition or proposed resolution as well as the time, place, and date of the hearing. In addition, if the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent to any public water, written notice of the petition or proposed resolution must be served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources at least 60 days before the hearing on the matter. The notice to the commissioner of natural resources does not create a right of intervention by the commissioner. At least 15 days prior to convening the hearing required under this section, the council or its designee must consult with the commissioner of natural resources to review the proposed vacation. Application Summary: To vacate unused rights-of-way from the County Road 15/Tanager bridge reconstruction project. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE # LA23-000002 17 April 2023 Page 2 of 3 The commissioner must evaluate: 1. The proposed vacation and the public benefits to do so; 2. the present and potential use of the land for access to public waters; and 3. how the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. The commissioner must advise the city council or its designee accordingly upon the evaluation. After a resolution of vacation is adopted, the clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings which shall contain the name of the city, an identification of the vacation, a statement of the time of completion thereof, and a description of the real estate and lands affected thereby. The notice shall be presented to the county auditor who shall enter the same in the transfer records and note upon the instrument, over official signature, the words "entered in the transfer record." The notice shall then be recorded with the county recorder. Any failure to file the notice shall not invalidate any vacation proceedings.  MN State Statue 462.358 Subd. 7. Vacation The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways under a home rule charter or other provisions of law. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve".  Orono City Code. Sec. 78-9. - Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this chapter; except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice, all as required by Minn. Stat. § 412.851. The council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, and telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as boulevard reserve. Engineer Comments The City’s engineer has reviewed the documents provided and offered the following comments: 1. The area to be vacated does not contain any city infrastructure. 2. The vacation of this area was reviewed by the city 2020 and recommended for vacation upon completion of the Hennepin County Bridge Project (see Resolution 7098) FILE # LA23-000002 17 April 2023 Page 3 of 3 Staff Analysis The land to be vacated is no longer needed for Country Road 15 and is not required to support the Tanager bridge. Orono City Council approved a resolution in 2020 in support of vacating the unused land. The land does not serve a public purpose and does not have a use for city services. Staff recommends approval of the proposed vacation. DNR Comments The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the vacation request and provided comments (Exhibit G). They support the vacation. Public Comments We have received a few phone calls/emails from the public requesting more information about the proposal. To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does this request follow the Comprehensive Plan? 2. Does this request meet the statutory requirements for approval? 3. Are there any issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the vacation. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Proposed Survey and Images Exhibit C. County Deed and Legal Descriptions Exhibit D. Utility Company Notifications Exhibit E. DNR Notification & Response Exhibit F. Resolution 7098 Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: NAN Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances from lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot setback, and rear yard setback. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on March 7, 2023 and considered to be complete on March 15, 2023. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on May 17, 2023. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new home on the existing foundation. The existing home and lot are nonconforming. The lot is substandard at 0.66 acres when the LR-1B District requires a minimum of 1 acre. Much of the existing home is located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback and rear yard setback. The current property is also over on hardcover. The proposed project will increase the height and volume of the home with a steeper roof pitch and second story. The project will also decrease the overall hardcover bringing the lot into conformance at 23%. In order to construct the proposed home on the existing foundation variances from lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback and rear yard setback are required. The location on the inlet bay creates extreme setbacks resulting in a very small building envelope that cannot support the construction of a new home. The location and substandard size are unique practical difficulties for the property. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, no comments were made. The Commission reviewed the application and voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variances as applied. 5. Public Comment. The applicant has provided neighbor acknowledgment forms. No other public comment has been received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution No. 7362 Exhibits A. Draft Resolution No. 7362 B. Proposed Plans C. Draft PC Minutes 4/17/2023 D. PC Staff Report 4/17/2023 References PC Exhibits 4/17/2023 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Form C. Survey D. Narrative E. Plans Item No.: 14 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000008 – David Charlez Designs – David Zweber, 1340 Vine Place, Variances – Resolution No. 7362 Presenter: Natalie Nye Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: NAN Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: F. Hardcover Information G. Volume Comparisons H. Neighbor Acknowledgments I. Property Owners List and Map CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-330, 78-350, 78-1279, & 78-1680 FILE NO. LA23-000008 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, David Zweber with David Charlez Designs (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 1340 Vine Place and legally described as: Lot 1, together with Canal Street and Northerly ½ of Canal vacated adoining said Lot 1, all of Lot 2, Southeasterly ½ of Lot 3, and that part of Lot 13, Block 17, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing on Northerly line of said Lot 13 at a point 25 feet Southeasterly from Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 17, Saga Hill, Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Southerly and parallel with Westerly line of said Lot 13 a distance of 100 feet; thence Southeasterly and parallel with Northerly line of said Lot 13, to Easterly line thereof; thence Northeasterly to Northeast corner thereof; thence Northwesterly to beginning, together with Canal Street and Northerly ½ of Canal vacation adjoining above described premises, EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows; The Southeasterly ½ of Lot 3 and those parts of Lots 2 and 13 vacated Canal Street described as follows: Commencing on the Northerly line of said Lot 13, a distance of 100 feet; thence Southerly and parallel with the Northesterly line of said Lot 13 to the Southeasterly line thereof; thence Southeaster at right angles to the Southeasterly line of said Lot 13, a distance of 32.8 feet; thence Northerly deflecting to the left 132 degrees, 35 minutes, a distance of 192.35 feet; thence deflecting to the right 40 degrees, a distance of 115 feet more or less to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 2; thence Northwesterly to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence Southwesterly along the line dividing said Lots 2 and 3 to the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence Northwesterly along the line dividing said Lots 3 and 13 to the point of beginning. (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a lot area variance from City Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a new single-family home; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for variances from average lakeshore setback and 75-foot lakeshore setback from City Code Section 78-1279 in order to construct a new single- family home; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a variance from hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback from City Code Section 78-1680 in order to construct a new single-family home; and Council Exhibit A CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 2 WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a rear yard setback variance from City Code Section 78-330 in order to construct a new single-family home; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 in favor of a motion to recommend approval of the variances as applied; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA23-000008. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 28,679 square feet in area and has a defined lot width of 227 feet at the 75- foot lakeshore setback and a lot width of 212 feet at the OHWL. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Lot Area b. Average Lakeshore Setback c. 75-foot Lakeshore Setback d. Hardcover within the 75-foot Lakeshore Setback e. Rear Yard Setback CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 3 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The variances for the construction of a new single-family home on an existing, nonconforming foundation and substandard parcel are supported by practical difficulties. Much of the existing home is located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, in front of the average lakeshore setback line and closer to the rear property line than the required rear yard setback. The proposal is to build a new home on top of the existing foundation and keep the existing lakeside decks. The lot currently contains a detached garage within the 75-foot lakeshore setback. The applicant is requesting to demolish this structure and construct an attached garage in a similar location. This slightly increases the hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback by 155 square feet. The expanded massing in front of the ALS is largely due to a steeper roof pitch to allow for a better insulated roof that will be able to shed snow effectively. The existing home does not meet the required rear yard setback of 30 feet. The proposal is to rebuild a new home on the existing foundation and to expand the footprint for a front porch. The front porch expansion is in the same plane as the existing wall, however due to the angle of the lot a reduced rear yard setback is requested. The construction of a new home on top of an existing, nonconforming foundation is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties of the substandard lot size, extreme setback requirements, and location of the existing structures. This criterion is met. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The variances resulting in a new single-family home constructed on a nonconforming foundation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The overall reduction in total hardcover bringing the lot into conformance is also consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The construction of a new single-family is a reasonable use of the property. The additional hardcover within the lake yard setback and massing requested is supported by practical CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 4 difficulties due to the extreme setback requirements creating a very small building envelope that cannot support the construction of a new home. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The existing house was not built by the current owners. The lot is substandard in area and has extreme setback limitations due to the location within the inlet of a bay and orientation to the lake. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing foundation to construct a new single-family home. The small lot size, extreme setback requirements, and placement of the existing structures on the lot are not the result of the current property owner’s actions . c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a larger home on an existing foundation are supported by practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. The additional massing in front of the average lakeshore setback line will not impact any site lines of the lake that are enjoyed by neighboring properties. The additional hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback is offset by the overall reduction in hardcover on the site, bringing the lot into conformance. This criterion is met. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR-1B District. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The substandard lot size, unique lot shape, location on the inlet of a bay creating extreme setback requirements and the location of the existing structures on the lot are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 5 9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the shape of the lot and location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.”. The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal is to use the existing foundation to construct a new single-family home. The modifications to the design that increase massing are necessary due to the need for a steeper roof pitch. The overall hardcover will also be reduced on the site. This criterion is met. 11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The variances allow for the construction of a new home utilizing an existing foundation. The project will decrease the overall hardcover on the site bringing it into conformance. This criterion is met. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-330, 78-350, 78-1279, and 78-1680 to allow the construction of a new single family home with exceptions to lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot setback, hardcover within the 75-foot setback and rear yard setback subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the attached site plan and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff (hereinafter the “Plans”), attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (May 8, 2024). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7362 6 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of May, 2023. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:36:48 PM 01TitleMISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN B E D U H N R E M O D E L 1340 VINE PLACE ORONO, MN REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:36:54 PM 02Title 2 MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN B E D U H N R E M O D E L 1340 VINE PLACE ORONO, MN REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Exst. First Floor Clg.8' - 4 1/2" Roof Peak 30' - 5 145/256" A B A B A B B B B B NEW ROOF NEW ROOF NEW ROOF Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"1' - 6"8' - 4 1/2"5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM EXST. FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM AWNING ROOF w/ CABLES 5/4" x 10" TRIM 4/4" x 12" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN MATCH T.O. NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION w/ EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION /(SEE 5 A12) New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4"1' - 6 3/4"B B C C C B B B C 62616058 108 25 57 56 55 54 222324 21 53 51 50 49 48 47 46 C C C 5/4" x 8" TRIM B B BB B B B NEW ROOF NEW ROOF EXISTING BALCONY 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN MATCH T.O. NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION w/ EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM B 5/4" x 8" TRIM B A A B 218 06 0507 10 09 08 101 31 303233 11 1214 13 37 36 383940 103 16 15 104 4241434445 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM C 36 EXISTING DECKEXISTING DECK DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:01 PM 03Front & Rear Elevations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO GRADE AND SITE CONDITIONS. ALL FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SITE SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR WILL STEP FOUNDATION WALLS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FROST PROTECTION (42" BELOW GRADE) IN ACCORDANCE TO CURRENT MINNESOTA CODE, REGULATIONS, AND ZONING. FOUNDATION WALLS DISCLOSURE: TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE COMPOSITE PANEL SMOOTH w/ BATTEN STRIPS @ 16" O.C. PER ELEVATION 4" EXPOSURE COMPOSITE SIDING PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE PANELING SMOOTH PER ELEVATION 199 METAL SIDING CORNERS PER ELEVATION 1X8 ON 1X18 COMPOSITE FASCIA PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION MARVIN ELEVATE WINDOWS w/ BLACK EXTERIORS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A SEE "TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS" FOR ALL CLADDING SHOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. elevation notes: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Rear Elevation IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM A B NEW ROOF B EXISTING FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN EXST. BALCONYAWNING ROOF /(SEE 5A12) BC 03 0402 01 2829 27 633534 102 B B B BB A NEW ROOF NEW ROOFB 5/4" x 8" TRIM 8" / 12" SLOPED ROOF5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM C C C 181719 20 52 59 26 C C C C 5/4" x 8" TRIM 8" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"8" / 12" 8" / 12" 8" / 12"8" / 12"ROOF RIDGE VENT ROOF RIDGE VENTROOF RIDGE VENT12"36"36"12"12" 24"24"24"36" 36"18"24"6"6"36"12"36"12"36"36"30"12" FLAT ROOF @ 1/4" SLOPE 19' - 0"36"ROOF RIDGE VENT ROOF RIDGE VENTNOTE: ALL EXISTING ROOFS TO BE REMOVED. ROOF PLAN INDICATES ALL NEW ROOF TRUSSES 28' - 10" 8"/12" SLOPE /(SEE 5 A12) TYPICAL AWNING w/ CABLES /(SEE 5 A12) TYPICAL AWNING w/ CABLES12"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:07 PM 04Left & Right Elevations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE COMPOSITE PANEL SMOOTH w/ BATTEN STRIPS @ 16" O.C. PER ELEVATION 4" EXPOSURE COMPOSITE SIDING PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE PANELING SMOOTH PER ELEVATION 199 METAL SIDING CORNERS PER ELEVATION 1X8 ON 1X18 COMPOSITE FASCIA PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION MARVIN ELEVATE WINDOWS w/ BLACK EXTERIORS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO GRADE AND SITE CONDITIONS. ALL FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SITE SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR WILL STEP FOUNDATION WALLS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FROST PROTECTION (42" BELOW GRADE) IN ACCORDANCE TO CURRENT MINNESOTA CODE, REGULATIONS, AND ZONING. FOUNDATION WALLS DISCLOSURE: SEE "TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS" FOR ALL CLADDING SHOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. elevation notes: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Left Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Right Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Roof Plan ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. MANUFACTURE WILL PROVIDE ALL ENGINEERING DRAWING AND SPECIFICS OVERHANG DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING ICE AND WATER ALL ADJOINING ROOFS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. roof plan notes: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 36' - 0"38' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"8' - 0"10' - 0"8' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"2' - 6"33' - 6 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"12' - 6"10' - 0"34' - 0"1' - 6"2' - 6"29' - 0"11' - 0"110' - 0" 110' - 0"3' - 0"- UNEXCAVATED - - NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION - 1' - 10 1/2" MASONRY OP'NG 9' - 3"2' - 9" MASONRY OP'NG 18' - 3"1' - 10 1/2" 10 1/2" M.O. 3' - 3"14' - 3" MASONRY OP'NG 9' - 3"6' - 4 1/2" - EXISTING CRAWL SPACE - - EXISTING CRAWL SPACE - -new crawl space to match existing - UNEXCAVATED MATCH T.O. NEW FOUNDATION TO EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION MATCH T.O. NEW FOUNDATION TO EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE FND WALL: 3'-6"x8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE NEW PORCH FND WALL: 3'-6"x8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE NEW STAIRCASE FND WALL: MATCH EXISTING WALL HEIGHTx8" POURED CONCRETE FND. ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE Exst. Exst. Exst. Exst. Exst. New New New Exst.New Exst. Exst.9' - 6"1' - 7 3/4"10' - 7"1 1/2"11' - 1 3/4"5' - 8 3/4"18' - 9 1/4" 1' - 8 3/4"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 7" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" 1 12 3 12 NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION WITH SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 2" SLAB LEDGE 2" SLAB LEDGE NEW STAIRCASE LOCATION. VERIFY EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS & SPECIFY NEW BEAMS/HEADERS IF NECESSARY BUILT-UP FLOOR AREA ON T.O. NEW FLR SYSTEMEXISTING DECK JOISTS & FOOTINGS EXISTING DECK JOISTS & FOOTINGS 42' - 6"42' - 6"NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION WITH SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER NOTE: VERIFY EXISTING SLAB LEDGE UPON REMOVAL OF SLAB TO RECIEVE NEW JOISTS. MFG TO SPEC NEW HANGERS/ LEDGERBOARD WHERE NECESSARY NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12"2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C.BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC.NEW FND WALLS: MATCH EXISTING HGT "x 8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING. PROVIDE 2" JOIST LEDGE AS NECESSARY REBAR PER CODE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Lower Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:11 PM 05Lower Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CONCRETE & FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD. EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEM & CRAWL SPACES TO REMAIN AS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC DEMO EXISTING STAIRCASE DEMO EXISTING KITCHEN CABINETS, APPLIANCES, ETC.REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTSREMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS REMOVE ALL EXISTING WALLS & REPLACE WITH NEW AS SHOWNREMOVE EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE & REPLACE WITH ATTACHED GARAGE AS SHOWN EXISTING COLUMN BEARING EXISTING DROPPED BEAMS EXISTING DROPPED BEAM REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS NEW MAIN LEVEL NEW GARAGE EXISTING COLUMN BEARINGEXISTING OP'NGEXISTING OP'NGDRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:16 PM 06Main Level Demo Plan MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Main Level Demo Plan REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 36' - 0"38' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"11' - 0"29' - 0"2' - 6"33' - 6 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"22' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"3' - 2 1/2"15' - 7"5' - 8 1/2"4' - 6"5' - 6"5' - 6"3' - 8 3/4"3' - 8 3/4"4' - 0"4' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"2' - 0"4' - 6"4' - 6"3' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"2' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"2' - 11 1/2"3' - 0"8' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"8' - 0"10' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"7' - 6 5/8"17' - 11 3/8"10' - 6"3' - 0"14' - 0"9' - 0"4' - 2"4' - 0 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"2' - 6"16' - 0"4' - 6"4' - 6"6' - 6" 110' - 0"4' - 10 1/4"4' - 10"14' - 7 1/4"2' - 1 1/2" 2' - 2 1/2" 7' - 11"4' - 5 1/2"2' - 3 1/4"7' - 10 1/4"12' - 9 1/4"2' - 4 1/2"3' - 3 1/4"5' - 0 1/4"6' - 3"4' - 2 3/4"5' - 8 3/4"7' - 8"4' - 5 1/2"12' - 7 1/4"4' - 2"9' - 2 3/4"GUEST RM LAKE BATH EXST. MECH CARPET FLOOR W.I.C. TILE FLR MUD ROOM TILE FLOOR LAUNDRY TILE FLOOR FAMILY ROOM WOOD FLOOR FOYER WOOD FLOOR DINING WOOD FLOOR KITCHEN WOOD FLOOR GREAT ROOM WOOD FLOOR POCKET OFFICE WOOD FLOOR GARAGE CONCRETE FLOOR ZERO ENTRYFIRE DOOR20 MIN. RATEDNEW FURN.90" FULL HGT. CAB.WSHR w/FLOORDRAIND SINK UPPER CABINETS54" VANITYTILE FLR36"x60" TILESHOWERFAN SD/CO SD/CO FAN SHELVING BY OTHERS7'-6" BENCH w/ LOCKERS48" DROPZONE9'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR 18'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR 9' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 0"48" RANGE HOOD VENTUPPER CABINETS60" FULL HGT. CABINET48" REF.24" D.W.30" SINKCOAT HOOKSEXST. STEPSEXST. STEPSEXST. OP'NGSTAIRS WOOD TREADS & RISERS EXISTING DECK WOOD STEPS 60" LINEAR GAS FIREPLACE PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING DECK 6X6 POST 6X6 POST GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS NOTE: SLOPE CONCRETE SLAB TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR & FOR ZERO ENTRY INTO HOUSE FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 FRONT PORCH STAMPED CONCRETE OPT. PINE T&G CLG.STEP DOWN1 12 3 12LINE OF EXISTING FLOOR HEIGHT CHANGERAISED FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. BUILT-IN DESK EXISTING COLUMN BEARING EXISTING DROPPED BEAMS EXISTING DROPPED BEAM 9' x 5' SERVING ISLAND TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEADR DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL INDICATES NEW WALLS INDICATES EXISTING WALLS (UNDISTURBED OR MODIFIED) SHELVING OPEN UNDER STAIRS NOTE: VERIFY COUNTERTOP HGT. BEFORE ORDERING WINDOWS UPPER CABINETS EXISTING COLUMN BEARINGEXISTING OPENINGRAILINGS PER CODE9'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR EXST. WELL HEAD NOTE: VERIFY EXISTING WELL HEAD DIMENSIONS TO DETERMINE HOUSING BOX SIZING DIMENSIONS 6' - 2 1/4"7' - 7 1/2"5' - 11"2' - 4 1/4"42' - 6"EQEQ 03 04 01 02 050806090710 1011021113 15 103 16 104 105 17 18 19 106107 20 21 22 23 24 25 108 2627 12 14 2' - 2 1/2"4' - 9 1/2"x32"80"109x32"80" 110 x60"80" 111 x36"80"112x36"80"114x36"80"113x36"80"115x36"80" 116 x36"80" 117 x36"80" 118 8'-11 3/4" CLG. HGT. 110' - 0"40' - 0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Main Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:21 PM 07Main Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD FLOOR TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT AT 19.2" O.C. FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-4 1/2" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE MAIN LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 15' - 6"12' - 6"1' - 0" 6X6 STRUCTURAL POSTS (ENG. TO VERIFY)BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. GUEST RM BATH EXST. MECH W.I.C. MUD ROOM LAUNDRYFAMILY ROOM FOYER KITCHEN GREAT ROOM POCKET OFFICE GARAGE STAIRS EXISTING DECK EXISTING SIDE DECK FRONT PORCH EXISTING BEARING WALL STEP DOWNEXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXST. DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM NEW FLOOR JOISTS (MATCH EXISTING)EXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMBEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVAC BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVAC ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVACOPEN TO ABOVE DINING OPEN TO ABOVE NEW BEAM PER MFG. SPEC.ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG.GARAGE DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.GARAGE DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. 1 12 3 12EXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSBEAM FLUSHEDPER MFG. SPEC.LANDING BEAM PER MFG. LANDING BEAM PER MFG. 19' - 0"11' - 0"BEAM w/ CANOPY HANDERS PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM w/ CANOPY HANDERS PER MFG. SPEC.BRG. PT. FROM ABOVE18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:26 PM 08Main Level Structural MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Main Level Structural NOT AN OFFICAL STRUCTURAL PLAN. ALL BEAMS, HEADERS, AND GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN MUST BE SPECIFIED AND DETERMINED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY ENGINEER FOR FINAL LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND SPECS. ROOF/FLOOR GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NOT ALL NECESSARY GIRDERS MAY BE SHOWN. TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS OF GIRDER TRUSSES. SIZE BEAMS/HEADERS TO ALLOW FOR HVAC RUNS THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF HOME. GRAYED OUT FRAMED WALLS ARE 2X6 BEARING WALLS UNLESS NOTED FLOOR TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT AT 19.2” O.C. FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-4 1/2" UNLESS NOTED T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE structural notes:IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM EXISTING BALCONY AREA DECREASE WIDTH AS SHOWN REMOVE EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES OVER MAIN LEVEL. REPLACE WITH NEW UPPER LEVEL AS SHOWN DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:30 PM 09Upper Level Demo Plan MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Upper Level Demo Plan REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 36' - 6 1/2"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"22' - 6"34' - 0"11' - 0"29' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"2' - 11 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 6 5/8"9' - 5 3/8"8' - 6"10' - 6"3' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"11' - 8 3/4"14' - 11 1/4"17' - 10"6' - 0"5' - 0" 17' - 0"19' - 0"72' - 6" 25' - 6"11' - 0 1/2"3' - 8 3/4"3' - 8 3/4"4' - 0"4' - 0"6' - 6"13' - 9 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"6' - 6"5' - 6"5' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"5' - 0" 108' - 6"5' - 6"6"5' - 0"4' - 6"5' - 8 1/2"15' - 7"3' - 2 1/2"9' - 3 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"4' - 6"4' - 6"17' - 0"4' - 6"7' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 0"7' - 6"12' - 0"9' - 6"8' - 1"5' - 10"5' - 6 1/2"8' - 6 1/2"9' - 11 1/2" 9' - 10 1/2"5' - 8" 41 1/2"41 1/2"1' - 0 1/2"4' - 0"7' - 4"12' - 4 1/4"2' - 4 1/2"4' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 3/4"4' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"12' - 4 1/4"7' - 0 1/4"6' - 10 1/2"SD/CO SD/CO SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. OWNER'S SUITE OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOW OPEN TO DINING BELOW EXST. LOFT BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOMEXST. BALCONY CARPET FLOORING COMPOSITE DECKING CABLE RAILING CABLE RAILING CABLE RAILING WOOD FLOORING CARPET FLOORING 18" LIN.54" VANITYFAN 36"x60" TILE SHOWER BI-PASS DOOR R&S 4' - 1 3/4" CARPET FLOORING R&S 5' - 8 3/4"4' - 1 3/4" CARPET FLOORING STAIRS WOOD TREADS & RISERSCABLE RAILINGCABLE RAILINGFAN78" VANITY36"x60" TILETUB/SHWRBEV. REF. WET BAR CARPET FLOORING VAULTED CEILINGS2X6 WALL2X6 PLMG WALL2X6 WALL2X6 PLMG WALL2X6 WALLFLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 10' - 6 1/2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR ELEVATION 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEMNEW FLOOR SYSTEM1 13 NEW LOFT WOOD FLOORING 1 12 3 1219 3/4"EXISTING BALCONY AREA DECREASE WIDTH AS SHOWN EXISTING EXPOSED BEAM @ MAIN LEVEL CLG. STORAGE SPACE STORAGE SPACE STORAGE SPACE INDICATES NEW WALLS INDICATES EXISTING WALLS (UNDISTURBED OR MODIFIED) TILE FLOOR OPEN BELOW SHELVING LINEN SHELVING4' - 3"2' - 4 1/2"16'-0" DRY BAR LINE OF VAULTLINE OF VAULT 16"16" NEW 8'-6" VANITY NEW 36"x60" FREE STANDING TUBNEW LINEN NEW LINEN NEW 84"x42" TILE SHOWER w/ CORNER BENCH10' - 7 3/4"EXISTING CLOSET 10' - 8"6' - 0 3/4" WALL SHOULD STACK w/ KITCHEN/MECH. WALL BELOW EQEQ 28 29 21830313233 34 35 3637 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 464748 495051 52 5354555658 59 606162 63 40' - 0"11' - 6"57x30"80"201x36"80"202x30"80" 203x30"80"204x60"80" 205 x30"80" 208 x48"80" 207x30"80"206x72"80" 210 x30"80"211x72"80" 209 x30"80"212x30"80" 213 x36"80"214x36"80" 215 x36"80" 216 x36"80" 217 BATH TILE 40' - 0"108' - 6" OWNER'S BATH TILE FLOOR 3' - 6"36 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Upper Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:36 PM 10Upper Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD ROOF TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT @ 24” O.C. ROOF SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-1 1/8" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE upper LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM OWNER'S SUITE OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOW OPEN TO DINING BELOW EXST. CLOSET OWNER'S BATH LOFT BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOM BALCONY ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 1 12 3 12 ATTIC ACCESS ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. BATH W.I.C. VAULT LINE VAULT LINEWINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:40 PM 11Upper Level Structural MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Upper Level Structural NOT AN OFFICAL STRUCTURAL PLAN. ALL BEAMS, HEADERS, AND GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN MUST BE SPECIFIED AND DETERMINED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY ENGINEER FOR FINAL LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND SPECS. ROOF/FLOOR GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NOT ALL NECESSARY GIRDERS MAY BE SHOWN. TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS OF GIRDER TRUSSES. SIZE BEAMS/HEADERS TO ALLOW FOR HVAC RUNS THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF HOME. GRAYED OUT FRAMED WALLS ARE 2X6 BEARING WALLS UNLESS NOTED ROOF TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT @ 24” O.C. ROOF SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-1 1/8" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE structural notes: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM Existing Upper Level Clg. Hgt.8' - 1 1/8"8"Existing Main Level Clg. Hgt.8' - 4 1/2"8"EXST. 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXST. 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEMEXST. BALCONYNew Energy Heel26 1/4"8" 12" 3' - 0" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING DECK EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst. 12 2 New Overhang 3' - 0" 8" 12"New Energy Heel26 1/4"2X 6 T R U S S T A I L S 2X 4 L O O K O U T S Sub Fascia17 1/2"EXST. WALLMETAL DRIP EDGE 4/4" x 8" TRIM 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" FASICA 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" SUB FASICA CO M P O S I T E V E N T E D S O F F I T S TYPICAL EAVE CONSTRUCTION: ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES #15FELT & ICE & WATER SHIELD (6'-0") 1/2" OSB SHEATHING w/STEEL CLIPS TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (PER MFG. SPEC.) BAFFLES w/1" AIR SPACE 2X4 LOOKOUTS 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 4/4" x 8" FASCIA ON 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISITNGNew Energy Heel30 1/4"3' - 0" 8" 12" ROOF, CEILING & EAVE CONSTRUCTION: WALL CONSTRUCTION: FOUNDATION WALL & BASEMENT SLAB CONSTRUCTION: MAIN LEVEL CONSTRUCTION: UPPER LEVEL CONSTRUCTION: ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES #15FELT & ICE & WATER SHIELD (6'-0") 1/2" OSB SHEATHING w/STEEL CLIPS TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (PER MFG. SPEC.) BAFFLES w/1" AIR SPACE 2X4 LOOKOUTS 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 4/4" x 8" FASCIA ON 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS R-50 BLOWN INSULATION POLY VAPOR BARRIER 5/8" GYP. BRD. CEILING 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GLUED & SCREWED 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. (FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SIZE & SPACING BASED ON SPANS) 5/8" GYP. BRD. ON CEILING SPRAY INSULATE RIMS (R-21) SIDING PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP (WRAP WINDOWS PER MFG. SPEC.) 1/2" OSB SHEATHING 2X6 STUDS @16" O.C. DBL. TOP PLATE R-21 WALL INSULATION 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BRD. 2X6 SOLE PLATE ALL DETAILS TO CONFORM W/ ENERGY CODE AS EXISTING AS EXISTING8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING New 3' - 0" 2' - 9 1/4"2 3/4" METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 15-1/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 15 1/8"4/4" x 10" COMP. FASCIA 2X4 BLOCKING CANOPY HANGERS PER ENG. SPEC.BEAM PERMFG. SPEC.2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X4 LOOKOUTS EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE 3/4" PLYWOOD (PITCHED @ 1/4" SLOPE MIN.) WEDGE BLOCK COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFIT TYPICAL FLAT EAVE w/ CABLES: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE (EXTEND MEMBRANE 12"-18" UP/DN ABUDDING WALLS/ROOFS) 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEDGE BLOCK 2X4 LOOKOUTS @ 24" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 5/4" x 8" COMPOSITE FASICA w/ METAL DRIP EDGE 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 10" COMPOSITE FASCIA 15-1/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 2X4 BLOCKING COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS FLOOR TRUSSES PER PLAN 1' - 6 3/4"12" 2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X4 LOOKOUTS 16 7/8"METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMP. FASCIA 16-7/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING @ 1/4" SLOPE MIN.Energy Heel11 3/8"COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS FLAT EAVE @ BONUS ROOM: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE (EXTEND MEMBRANE 12"-18" UP/DN ABUDDING WALLS/ROOFS) 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEDGE BLOCK 2X4 LOOKOUTS @ 24" O.C. 5/4" x 8" COMPOSITE FASICA w/ METAL DRIP EDGE 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA 16-7/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:45 PM 12Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/2" = 1'-0" 1Typical Wall Section 1 1" = 1'-0" 2Detail - Typical Eave 1/2" = 1'-0" 3Typical Wall Section 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 5 Detail - Typical Eave w/ Hangers 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 6 Detail - Flat Eave @ Bonus Rm IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"3' - 6"12 5Heel18 1/4"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.NewNew New 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.2' - 0" 8" 12" 8" 12"4' - 0 1/2"Ceiling Height Varies w/ Vault2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE Heel18 5/16"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. BATHLAUNDRYFAMILY ROOM GARAGE NEW 2x10 JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BONUS ROOM NOTE: NEW EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER. MATCH EXISTING HEIGHT GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. 18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 10' - 11 1/2"51' - 6"9' - 11 1/2"Upper Level to Apex of Vault11' - 0 13/16"New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" 3' - 0"6"NEW CRAWL SPACE6 1/4"BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor 0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"6 1/4"1' - 6"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"7' - 5 3/4"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING BEAMS Exst.Exst. New New 4' - 0 1/2"NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISTING BEAM OR GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.3' - 6"New Heel13 5/8"MUD ROOM FAMILY ROOM DININGGREAT ROOM GARAGE 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" 8" 12"Heel18 5/16"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. OWNER'S SUITEBDRM #2 BDRM #3 BONUS ROOM EXISTING CRAWL SPACEEXISTING CRAWL SPACE NEW GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. 1 8 "18"18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 36" 24" 12" 12" FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS 10' - 11 1/2"23' - 0 1/2"28' - 5 1/2"45' - 11 1/2" BDRM #3 CLOSET New First Floor Clg. 8' - 11 3/4"Ceiling Height Varies w/ Vault2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"Upper Level to Apex of Vault8" 12"6"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA W/ SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Lowered First Floor-0' - 6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"11' - 0 3/4"12 6 Heel11 3/8"Heel11 3/8"Heel40 3/4"NEW SCISSOR TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 2' - 0" 3 1/2" 12" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE 3' - 6"3' - 6"BONUS ROOM GARAGE 8" 12" 3' - 0" GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEADR DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 10' - 8 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" 2" 12"Upper Level to Apex of Vault9' - 9 9/16"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:50 PM 13Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Family Rm/Garage 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Section - Great Room/Garage 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Section - Garage REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.New 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"Heel30 1/4"3' - 0" 14 4 3' - 6"2' - 0 3/4"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"7' - 0"2' - 6" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" FRONT PORCH PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG. FAMILY ROOM FOYER BDRM #2NEW LOFT New BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 22' - 2 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" EXST. DECK4"Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Lowered First Floor-0' - 6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 6"Heel11 3/8"Heel30 1/4"3 1/2" 12" 8" 12"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 6"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.3' - 6"2' - 0 3/4"9' - 2"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. New BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. FRONT PORCH PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG. 9' - 6" GUEST RMLAKE BATH BDRM #3 BDRM #4 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 14 4 Sim NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER. MATCH EXISTING 22' - 2 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4"4"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISITNG FLOOR SYSTEM NEW CRAWL SPACE NEW DROPPED BEAM PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor 0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"29' - 0"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM2' - 0 3/4"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG.3' - 6"12"12" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. Exst.Exst.New EXST. MECH KITCHENPOCKET OFFICE FRONT PORCH OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOWOWNER'S BATH 28' - 10"36' - 5 1/2" NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 3' - 0"11 11/16"2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X 4 T R U S S T A I L S Energy Heel30 1/4"METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMP. FASCIA 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS 8" 12" DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:56 PM 14Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Family Rm/Front Porch 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Section - Lake Bath/Front Porch 1/4" = 1'-0" 3Section - Pocket Office/Front Porch 1" = 1'-0" 4 Detail - Eave @ New Loft IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor 1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg. 9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"3' - 0"3' - 0"Heel26 1/4"Heel26 1/4"New Window Hgt.16' - 0 1/2"New Window Hgt.16' - 0 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"6' - 10 1/2"EXST. BEAMS EXST. BEAM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM 8" 12" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.Exst. DININGKITCHEN loft NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 14' - 5 1/2"14' - 5 1/2" Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2"Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"4' - 0 1/2"4' - 0 1/2"3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"EXISTING BEAMS EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM10 3/4"7' - 5 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.6 1/4"1' - 6"Heel18 5/16"Heel18 5/16"18"1 8 "3' - 6"NewNew Exst.Exst. ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE 18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" 3' - 0"3' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 0"1' - 0"8' - 11 3/4"New GUEST RM MUD ROOMFOYER DININGGREAT ROOM GARAGE OWNER'S SUITEEXST. LOFT BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOMNEW LOFT 7' - 4 13/16"10' - 11 1/2"10' - 11 1/2"Upper Level to Apex of Vault11' - 0 13/16"New First Floor Clg. 8' - 11 3/4"2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS FLOOR DRAINS SAND BED GRANULAR FILL6"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISTING NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA W/ SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8"Heel6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE 11"7 7/16"5' - 7"4' - 11 1/2"TYPICAL STAIRCASE CONSTRUCTION: 6'-10" MINIMUM HEADROOM (4) 11- 7/8" STAIR STRINGER w/1-1/8" x 11-1/4" PARTICLE BOARD TREADS PROVIDE 34"-36" HGT HANDRAILS & GUARDS RAILS PER CODE TYPICAL STAIRCASE LANDING CONSTRUCTION: 2-2x8 HEADER 3/4" PLYWOOD BACKING 2x8 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 3/4" PLYWOOD FAMILY ROOM STAIRS BDRM #2NEW LOFT 3' - 6"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"6' - 6" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. New New Exst. NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 13' - 8 1/2"22' - 2 1/2" LANDING BEAMS PER MFG. 6" New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" EXST. DECK 8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:01 PM 15Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Dining/Kitchen 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Section - Owner's Suite/Bonus Room 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Section - Stairs/Family Room IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC ABBREVIATIONS LIST = AIR CONDITIONING = ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR = ALUMINIUM = BOTTOM CHORD BEARING = BOARD = BEDROOM = BUILT IN = BEAM = BOTTOM OF = BEARING = BASEMENT = CABINETS = CANTLIEVER = CEILING = CENTER LINE = CASED OPENING = CONCRETE = CONTINUOUS = CARPET = CERAMIC TILE = CASEMENT = DOUBLE = DEMOLISH OR DEMOLITION = DOUBLE HUNG = DIAMETER = DIMENSION(S) = DOWN = DRYWALL OPENING = DOOR = DISHWASHER = DRAWING = EACH = ENERGY HEEL = ELECTRIC = ELEVATIONS OR ELEVATOR = ENGINEER = ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE M-CLASS = EQUAL = EXTERIOR = EXISTING = FLOOR DRAIN = FINISHED = FLOOR = FOUNDATION = FIREPLACE = FRAMING = FREEZER = FOOTING = FURNITURE = FUTURE = FIXED = GLIDER = GIRDER TRUSS = GYPSUM = GYPSUM BOARD = HEADER = HEIGHT = HEATING VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING = IN FLOOR HEAT = INSULATION = INTERIOR = LANDING = LINEN = LOCKERS = LOWER LEVEL = LOOKOUT = LUXURY VINYL TILE = LUXURY VINYL PLANK = MAXIMUM = MECHANICAL = MANUFACTURE(R) = MINIMUM = MAIN LEVEL = MASONRY OPENING = NUMBER = NOMINAL = ON CENTER = OFFICE = OPENING = OPTION(AL) = POLISHED CONCRETE = PERIMETER = POCKET = PLUMBING = PLYWOOD = POWDER = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE = REFRIGERATOR = REQUIRED = ROOM = ROD & SHELF = SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE = SMOKE DETECTOR = SMOKE / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR = SINGLE HUNG = SHELVING = SHELVES = SIMILAR OR SIMULATOR = SLIDER = SINK = SPECIFICATION(S) OR SPECIFIED = STEEL = STORAGE = STRUCTURAL = SQUARE FOOTAGE = TO BE DETERMINED = TOP CHORD BEARING = TONGUE AND GROOVE = TOP OF = TREATED = TRANSOM = TYPICAL = UPPER LEVEL = UNFINISHED = VANITY = WOOD = WINDOW = WALK IN CLOSET = WITH = WALKOUT = WASHER A.C. A.F.F. ALUM. B.C.B. BD. BDRM. B.I. B'M B.O. BRG. BSMT. CABS. CANT. CLG. C.L. C.O. CONC. CONT. CPT. C.T. CSMT DBL. DEMO D.H. DIA. DIM(S) DN. D.O. DR. D.W. DWG. EA. E.H. ELEC. ELEV. ENG. EPDM EQ. EXT. EXST. F.D. FIN. FLR. FND. F/P FRMG. FRZ. FTG. FURN. FUT. FX. GLD. G.T. GYP. GYP. BD. HDR. HGT. HVAC I.F.H. INSUL. INT. LDG. LIN. LKRS. L.L. L.O. L.V.T. L.V.P. MAX. MECH. MFG. MIN. M.L. M.O. NO. NOM. O.C. OFF. OP'NG OPT. P. CONC. PERM. PKT. PLMG. PLWD. PWDR PVC REF. REQD RM. R&S S.D.L. SD. SD/CO S.H. SHLVG. SHLVS. SIM. SLD. SNK SPEC. ST'L ST'RG STRUC. SQ. FTG. TBD. T.C.B. T&G T.O. TRD. TRSM. TYP. U.L. UNFIN. VTY. W'D WDW W.I.C. W/ W.O. WSHR. DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:06 PM 16Schedules & Notes MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 2. ALL INTERIOR WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2x4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 3. WALLS ADJACENT TO GARAGE SPACE SHALL BE 2x6 WITH A 1 HR. FIRE RATING 4. STRUCTURAL WALLS TO HAVE A FIRE RATING OF 1 HR. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF STUD 6. PROVIDE ROOF VENTILATION 1 SQ.FT. PER 300 SQ.FT. OF ROOF AREA. 50% AT RIDGE AND 50% AT SOFFIT-MIN 7.ALL INTERIOR DOOR HEAD HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. UNDERCUT MIN 1" 8. ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO BE VERIFIED BY MANF. AND A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 9. ALL WINDOW UNITS ABOVE TUB DECK AND/OR WITHIN 18" OF THE FLOOR AND/OR 24" OF A DOORWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS 10. PROVIDE AN APPROVED ICE AND WATER ROOFING STARTER EDGE PER CODE OR EQUIVALENT 11. WRAP ALL CANTILEVERS WITH AN APPROVED POLY AND SPRAY FOAM FLOOR 12. SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AWAY FROM THE HOUSE ON ALL SIDES 13. 1/2" AIR SPACE ON EACH SIDE OF MICRO-LAM BEAM & MIN 3" BEARING ON CONCRETE 14. EXTERIOR RAILING TO BE MIN OF 36" HIGH AND BUILT AS TO NOT ALLOW A 4" SPHERE TO PASS THROUGH 15. ALL COMPONENTS TO BE INSTALLED TO MANF. SPEC OR LOCAL CODE 16. ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY IS TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD SPECIES THAT HAS A NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY 17. PROVIDE A WATER RESISTIVE GYP BOARD AROUND ALL SHOWERS AND TUBS 18. LIGHT OR FAN HOUSING SYSTEM RECESSED THROUGH AN EXTERIOR VAPOR BARRIER SHALL BE OF THE AIR SEALED TYPE OR BE BOXED AND SEALED PER CODE 19. PROVIDE DRAFT STOPS PER UBC 708.3 20. FIRE BLOCK ALL CHASES AT EACH FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY OR AT 10' MAX INTERVALS 21. ALL SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE HARD WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP PER CODE 22. MAINTAIN A 6" SEPARATION BETWEEN GRADE AND WOOD 23. CAULK AND FLASH AROUND ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS 24. PLUMBING PENETRATIONS IN WALL ASSEMBLY SHALL BE FIRE CAULKED WITH LISTED MATERIALS 25. BLOCK PATIO DOORS WITHOUT A DECK 26. SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE MIN 16" AWAY FROM WALL AND INSTALL TO MANF. SPEC 27. NO OPENING IN ROOF WITHIN 5' OF PROPERTY LINES 28. 10% OF THE FLOOR AREA IS REQUIRED FOR LIGHT AND VENTILATION IN ALL HABITABLE ROOMS 29. ON EXTERIOR, GRIPPABLE HANDRAILS 34" TO 36" IN HEIGHT FROM THE NOSE OF THE STAIRS 30. COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS 12" OFF THE FLOOR OR RETURN AIR PLENUM WHEN REQUIRED (IMC703) 31. PROVIDE PLUMBING ACCESS AT ALL TUBS EXCEPT WHEN TRAPS & OVERFLOW GLUED 32. PROVIDE 50 cfm OR 20 cfm CONTINUOUS VENTILATION OR OPERABLE WINDOW (ASHRAE 62-2001 6.1) 33. DRYER VENT TO THE EXTERIOR- INSULATE LAST 3 FEET MIN 36" CLEARANCE TO OTHER OPENINGS: (IMC504.4, 401.52 AND 604.1) 34. CERAMIC TILE TO BE APPLIED OVER GREEN BOARD, CEMENT BOARD, WONDER BOARD OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL TO A HEIGHT OF 70" ABOVE DRAIN INLET IN SHOWERS. CEMENT BOARD MUST BE USED ON EXTERIOR WALLS UNDERNEATH TILE AND OVER THE VAPOR BARRIER (R307) 35. TRUSS PLANS STAMPED AND APPROVED BY MANF. SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE. ALTERATIONS TO TRUSSES REQUIRE AN ENGINEER'S APPROVAL 36. RAFTERS SHALL BE FRAMED TO MIN 1" THICK RIDGE BOARD NOT LESS THAN THE DEPTH OF THE CUT END OF THE RAFTERS OR NAILED TO EACH OTHER WITH A GUSSET PLATE A TIE. THE RIDGE BOARD MUST BE SUPPORTED ON END WALL OR MIN 2x4 COLLAR TIES ARE REQUIRED AT MIN 4" O.C. 37. 4-MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON WARM IN WINTER SIDE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND CEILING. FIRE RETARDANT VAPOR BARRIER MAY BE LEFT UNCOVERED 38. WIND-WASH AT AL EAVES, CORNERS, OVERHANGS, AND BY WINDOWS. SHEATHING INSULATION DAM @ CEILING CHANGES 39. WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER-i.e. BUILDING WRAP TABLE R703.4 40. HOT WATER PIPING LOCATED OUTSIDE OF CONDITIONED SPACE WILL BE INSULATED TO AT LEAST R-3 41. ATTIC ACCESS DOORS FROM CONDITIONED TO UNCONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE WEATHERED- STRIPPED AND INSULATED. 42. NEW WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES WILL HAVE TIGHT-FITTING FLUE DAMPERS AND OUTDOOR COMBUSTION AIR. 43. FOR WINDOWS WHERE THE LOWEST PART OF THE WINDOW OPENING IS MORE THAN 6' ABOVE THE GROUND, THE LOWEST PART OF OPENING SHALL BE MIN. OF 36" ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE WINDOWS THAT DO NOT OPEN MORE THAN 4", WINDOWS WITH FALL PROTECTION, AND WINDOWS THAT HAVE OPENING CONTROL DEVICES. 44. DWELLINGS WITH ATTACHED GARAGES OR FUEL FIRED EQUIPMENT MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS OUTSIDE OF, BUT NO FURTHER THAN 10' FROM , EACH SLEEPING AREA OR BEDROOM. 45. FOOTINGS SHALL HAVE A MIN. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5,000 psi. 46. A MIN. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD MEMBRANE, OR 5/8" WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL MEMBRANE, SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR ASSEMBLIES. EXCEPTIONS A.DWELLINGS EQUIPPED WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM. B.CRAWLSPACES C.PORTIONS OF FLOOR ASSEMBLIES WITH PROPORTIONALLY SMALL AREA. D. FLOOR ASSEMBLIES CONSTRUCTED OF SOLID SAWN LUMBER OR STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE LUMBER WITH MIN. NOMINAL DIMENSIONS OF 2"x10". 47. DECKS SUPPORTED BY ATTACHMENT TO AN EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE POSITIVELY ANCHORED TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND DESIGNED FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND LATERAL LOADS. 48. FLASHING WITH A MIN. 3 1/2" VERTICAL ATTACHMENT FLANGE IS REQUIRED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE FOUNDATION AND RIM JOIST FRAMING WHEN THE EXTERIOR WALL COVERING DOES NOT LAP THE FOUNDATION INSULATION. THE FLASHING MUST EXTEND A MIN. OF 1" BELOW THE FOUNDATION PLATE LINE, AND THE REQUIRED WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER MUST LAP OVER THE ATTACHMENT FLANGE. 49. BUILDING FRAMING CAVITIES SHALL NOT BE USED AS DUCTS OR PLENUMS D O O R S C H E D U L E Tag Door Size Door Type Quantity Head Height Level 101 ELSFD12070 Marvin Elevate Sliding French 4-Panel 1 7' - 2"Exst. Raised First Floor 102 UBFLD9080-3P Marvin Ultimate Bi-Fold 1 7' - 11 1/2"Existing First Floor 103 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Lowered First Floor 104 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Lowered First Floor 105 9'-0" x 8'-0"Single Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 106 18'-0" x 8'-0"Double Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 107 9'-0" x 8'-0"Single Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 108 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Existing First Floor 109 32" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Exst. Raised First Floor 110 32" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Exst. Raised First Floor 111 60" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 112 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 113 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 114 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 115 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing First Floor 116 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 117 36" x 80"Fire Door - 20min. Rated 1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 118 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 201 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 202 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 203 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 204 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 205 60" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 206 30" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 207 48" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 208 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 209 72" x 80"Double Bi-Pass Door (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 210 72" x 80"Double Bi-Pass Door (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 211 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 212 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 213 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 214 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 215 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 216 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 217 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 218 USPD12070 Marvin Ultimate Sliding Patio 3-Panel 1 7' - 2"Existing Second Floor Grand total: 36 M A R V I N W I N D O W S C H E D U L E TagWindow CodeWindow TypeQuantity Head Height Level Room Location 01ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 02ELAWN5763Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 03ELCAP7363Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 04ELCAP7319Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 05ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 06ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 07ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 08ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 09ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 10ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 11ELCA3771Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 12ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 2' - 0 7/8"Existing First Floor 13ELCA3771Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 14ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 2' - 0 7/8"Existing First Floor 15ELCA3355Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 16ELCA3355Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 17ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 18ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 19ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 20ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 21ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 22ELCA3371Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 23ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 24ELCA3371Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 25ELCAP5771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 26ELCA3343Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 27ELCAP5747Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 28ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 29ELCAP7363Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 30ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 31ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 32ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 33ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 34ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 35ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 36ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 2 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 37ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 38ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 39ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 40ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 41ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 42ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 43ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 44ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 45ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 46ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 47ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 48ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 49ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 50ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 51ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 52ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 53ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 54ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 55ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 56ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 57ELCAP5771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 58ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 59ELCAP3771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 60ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 61ELCAP7371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 62ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 63ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor Total Windows: 64 REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 1155 SF EXISTING DECK 2318 SF EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 899 SF NEW GARAGE 172 SF FRONT PORCH ADDITION 24 SF STAIR ADDITION 1060 SF EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 2090 SF UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 85 SF EXISTING BALCONY 1/8" = 1'-0" 1Main Level 1/8" = 1'-0" 2Upper Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:11 PM 17Square Footage Calculations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN S Q. F T G. C A L C S. Name Sq. Ftg.Level Area Type EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 2318 SF Existing First Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. STAIR ADDITION 24 SF Existing First Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 1060 SF Existing Second Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 2090 SF Existing Second Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. FINISHED SQ. FTG.5492 SF EXISTING DECK 1155 SF Existing First Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. FRONT PORCH ADDITION 172 SF Existing First Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. EXISTING BALCONY 85 SF Existing Second Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. OUTDOOR SQ. FTG.1411 SF NEW GARAGE 899 SF Existing First Floor UNCONDITIONED SQ. FTG. UNCONDITIONED SQ. FTG.899 SF REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:36:48 PM 01TitleMISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN B E D U H N R E M O D E L 1340 VINE PLACE ORONO, MN REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:36:54 PM 02Title 2 MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN B E D U H N R E M O D E L 1340 VINE PLACE ORONO, MN REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Exst. First Floor Clg.8' - 4 1/2" Roof Peak 30' - 5 145/256" A B A B A B B B B B NEW ROOF NEW ROOF NEW ROOF Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"1' - 6"8' - 4 1/2"5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM EXST. FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM AWNING ROOF w/ CABLES 5/4" x 10" TRIM 4/4" x 12" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN MATCH T.O. NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION w/ EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION /(SEE 5 A12) New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4"1' - 6 3/4"B B C C C B B B C 62616058 108 25 57 56 55 54 222324 21 53 51 50 49 48 47 46 C C C 5/4" x 8" TRIM B B BB B B B NEW ROOF NEW ROOF EXISTING BALCONY 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN MATCH T.O. NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION w/ EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM B 5/4" x 8" TRIM B A A B 218 06 0507 10 09 08 101 31 303233 11 1214 13 37 36 383940 103 16 15 104 4241434445 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM C 36 EXISTING DECKEXISTING DECK DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:01 PM 03Front & Rear Elevations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO GRADE AND SITE CONDITIONS. ALL FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SITE SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR WILL STEP FOUNDATION WALLS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FROST PROTECTION (42" BELOW GRADE) IN ACCORDANCE TO CURRENT MINNESOTA CODE, REGULATIONS, AND ZONING. FOUNDATION WALLS DISCLOSURE: TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE COMPOSITE PANEL SMOOTH w/ BATTEN STRIPS @ 16" O.C. PER ELEVATION 4" EXPOSURE COMPOSITE SIDING PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE PANELING SMOOTH PER ELEVATION 199 METAL SIDING CORNERS PER ELEVATION 1X8 ON 1X18 COMPOSITE FASCIA PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION MARVIN ELEVATE WINDOWS w/ BLACK EXTERIORS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A SEE "TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS" FOR ALL CLADDING SHOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. elevation notes: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Rear Elevation IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM A B NEW ROOF B EXISTING FOUNDATION 5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM 5/4" x 8" TRIM SITE VERIFY GRADE SLOPES. ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM GRADE SLOPES SHOWN EXST. BALCONYAWNING ROOF /(SEE 5A12) BC 03 0402 01 2829 27 633534 102 B B B BB A NEW ROOF NEW ROOFB 5/4" x 8" TRIM 8" / 12" SLOPED ROOF5/4" x 8" TRIM 4/4" x 10" TRIM C C C 181719 20 52 59 26 C C C C 5/4" x 8" TRIM 8" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"3 1/2" / 12"8" / 12" 8" / 12" 8" / 12"8" / 12"ROOF RIDGE VENT ROOF RIDGE VENTROOF RIDGE VENT12"36"36"12"12" 24"24"24"36" 36"18"24"6"6"36"12"36"12"36"36"30"12" FLAT ROOF @ 1/4" SLOPE 19' - 0"36"ROOF RIDGE VENT ROOF RIDGE VENTNOTE: ALL EXISTING ROOFS TO BE REMOVED. ROOF PLAN INDICATES ALL NEW ROOF TRUSSES 28' - 10" 8"/12" SLOPE /(SEE 5 A12) TYPICAL AWNING w/ CABLES /(SEE 5 A12) TYPICAL AWNING w/ CABLES12"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:07 PM 04Left & Right Elevations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE COMPOSITE PANEL SMOOTH w/ BATTEN STRIPS @ 16" O.C. PER ELEVATION 4" EXPOSURE COMPOSITE SIDING PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE PANELING SMOOTH PER ELEVATION 199 METAL SIDING CORNERS PER ELEVATION 1X8 ON 1X18 COMPOSITE FASCIA PER ELEVATION COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION MARVIN ELEVATE WINDOWS w/ BLACK EXTERIORS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO GRADE AND SITE CONDITIONS. ALL FOUNDATION WALL HEIGHTS MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SITE SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR WILL STEP FOUNDATION WALLS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FROST PROTECTION (42" BELOW GRADE) IN ACCORDANCE TO CURRENT MINNESOTA CODE, REGULATIONS, AND ZONING. FOUNDATION WALLS DISCLOSURE: SEE "TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS" FOR ALL CLADDING SHOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. elevation notes: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Left Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Right Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Roof Plan ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. MANUFACTURE WILL PROVIDE ALL ENGINEERING DRAWING AND SPECIFICS OVERHANG DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING ICE AND WATER ALL ADJOINING ROOFS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. METAL FASCIAS AND ROOFS HAVE THE TENDENCY TO OIL CAN UNDER CERTAIN WEATHER CONDITIONS. CONSULT CONTRACTOR FOR METAL GAUGE THICKNESS OPTIONS TO REDUCE WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS (BUBBLING, WARPING, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS (VENT PIPES, EXHAUST FANS, FURNACE/AC PIPES, ETC) ARE PLACED IN OBSCURE LOCATIONS ON ROOF TO MINIMIZE THE SIGHT OF PENETRATIONS FROM MAIN ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF HOME. roof plan notes: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 36' - 0"38' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"8' - 0"10' - 0"8' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"2' - 6"33' - 6 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"12' - 6"10' - 0"34' - 0"1' - 6"2' - 6"29' - 0"11' - 0"110' - 0" 110' - 0"3' - 0"- UNEXCAVATED - - NEW GARAGE FOUNDATION - 1' - 10 1/2" MASONRY OP'NG 9' - 3"2' - 9" MASONRY OP'NG 18' - 3"1' - 10 1/2" 10 1/2" M.O. 3' - 3"14' - 3" MASONRY OP'NG 9' - 3"6' - 4 1/2" - EXISTING CRAWL SPACE - - EXISTING CRAWL SPACE - -new crawl space to match existing - UNEXCAVATED MATCH T.O. NEW FOUNDATION TO EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION MATCH T.O. NEW FOUNDATION TO EXISTING T.O. FOUNDATION TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE FND WALL: 3'-6"x8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE NEW PORCH FND WALL: 3'-6"x8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE NEW STAIRCASE FND WALL: MATCH EXISTING WALL HEIGHTx8" POURED CONCRETE FND. ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING REBAR PER CODE Exst. Exst. Exst. Exst. Exst. New New New Exst.New Exst. Exst.9' - 6"1' - 7 3/4"10' - 7"1 1/2"11' - 1 3/4"5' - 8 3/4"18' - 9 1/4" 1' - 8 3/4"10' - 2 1/4"12' - 7" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" 1 12 3 12 NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION WITH SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 2" SLAB LEDGE 2" SLAB LEDGE NEW STAIRCASE LOCATION. VERIFY EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS & SPECIFY NEW BEAMS/HEADERS IF NECESSARY BUILT-UP FLOOR AREA ON T.O. NEW FLR SYSTEMEXISTING DECK JOISTS & FOOTINGS EXISTING DECK JOISTS & FOOTINGS 42' - 6"42' - 6"NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION WITH SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER NOTE: VERIFY EXISTING SLAB LEDGE UPON REMOVAL OF SLAB TO RECIEVE NEW JOISTS. MFG TO SPEC NEW HANGERS/ LEDGERBOARD WHERE NECESSARY NEW PAD 36"x36"x12" NEW PAD 36"x36"x12"2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 2x10 JOISTS @ 16" O.C.BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC.NEW FND WALLS: MATCH EXISTING HGT "x 8" POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION ON 20"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING. PROVIDE 2" JOIST LEDGE AS NECESSARY REBAR PER CODE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Lower Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:11 PM 05Lower Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CONCRETE & FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD. EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEM & CRAWL SPACES TO REMAIN AS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC DEMO EXISTING STAIRCASE DEMO EXISTING KITCHEN CABINETS, APPLIANCES, ETC.REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTSREMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS REMOVE ALL EXISTING WALLS & REPLACE WITH NEW AS SHOWNREMOVE EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE & REPLACE WITH ATTACHED GARAGE AS SHOWN EXISTING COLUMN BEARING EXISTING DROPPED BEAMS EXISTING DROPPED BEAM REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS REMOVE ALL EXISTING WINDOWS & MODIFY EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS FOR NEW WINDOW/DOOR PLACEMENTS NEW MAIN LEVEL NEW GARAGE EXISTING COLUMN BEARINGEXISTING OP'NGEXISTING OP'NGDRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:16 PM 06Main Level Demo Plan MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Main Level Demo Plan REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 36' - 0"38' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"11' - 0"29' - 0"2' - 6"33' - 6 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"22' - 6"34' - 0"1' - 6"3' - 2 1/2"15' - 7"5' - 8 1/2"4' - 6"5' - 6"5' - 6"3' - 8 3/4"3' - 8 3/4"4' - 0"4' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 9 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"2' - 0"4' - 6"4' - 6"3' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"2' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"2' - 11 1/2"3' - 0"8' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"8' - 0"10' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"7' - 6 5/8"17' - 11 3/8"10' - 6"3' - 0"14' - 0"9' - 0"4' - 2"4' - 0 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"2' - 6"16' - 0"4' - 6"4' - 6"6' - 6" 110' - 0"4' - 10 1/4"4' - 10"14' - 7 1/4"2' - 1 1/2" 2' - 2 1/2" 7' - 11"4' - 5 1/2"2' - 3 1/4"7' - 10 1/4"12' - 9 1/4"2' - 4 1/2"3' - 3 1/4"5' - 0 1/4"6' - 3"4' - 2 3/4"5' - 8 3/4"7' - 8"4' - 5 1/2"12' - 7 1/4"4' - 2"9' - 2 3/4"GUEST RM LAKE BATH EXST. MECH CARPET FLOOR W.I.C. TILE FLR MUD ROOM TILE FLOOR LAUNDRY TILE FLOOR FAMILY ROOM WOOD FLOOR FOYER WOOD FLOOR DINING WOOD FLOOR KITCHEN WOOD FLOOR GREAT ROOM WOOD FLOOR POCKET OFFICE WOOD FLOOR GARAGE CONCRETE FLOOR ZERO ENTRYFIRE DOOR20 MIN. RATEDNEW FURN.90" FULL HGT. CAB.WSHR w/FLOORDRAIND SINK UPPER CABINETS54" VANITYTILE FLR36"x60" TILESHOWERFAN SD/CO SD/CO FAN SHELVING BY OTHERS7'-6" BENCH w/ LOCKERS48" DROPZONE9'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR 18'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR 9' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 0"48" RANGE HOOD VENTUPPER CABINETS60" FULL HGT. CABINET48" REF.24" D.W.30" SINKCOAT HOOKSEXST. STEPSEXST. STEPSEXST. OP'NGSTAIRS WOOD TREADS & RISERS EXISTING DECK WOOD STEPS 60" LINEAR GAS FIREPLACE PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING DECK 6X6 POST 6X6 POST GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS NOTE: SLOPE CONCRETE SLAB TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR & FOR ZERO ENTRY INTO HOUSE FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 FRONT PORCH STAMPED CONCRETE OPT. PINE T&G CLG.STEP DOWN1 12 3 12LINE OF EXISTING FLOOR HEIGHT CHANGERAISED FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. BUILT-IN DESK EXISTING COLUMN BEARING EXISTING DROPPED BEAMS EXISTING DROPPED BEAM 9' x 5' SERVING ISLAND TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEADR DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL INDICATES NEW WALLS INDICATES EXISTING WALLS (UNDISTURBED OR MODIFIED) SHELVING OPEN UNDER STAIRS NOTE: VERIFY COUNTERTOP HGT. BEFORE ORDERING WINDOWS UPPER CABINETS EXISTING COLUMN BEARINGEXISTING OPENINGRAILINGS PER CODE9'-0" x 8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR EXST. WELL HEAD NOTE: VERIFY EXISTING WELL HEAD DIMENSIONS TO DETERMINE HOUSING BOX SIZING DIMENSIONS 6' - 2 1/4"7' - 7 1/2"5' - 11"2' - 4 1/4"42' - 6"EQEQ 03 04 01 02 050806090710 1011021113 15 103 16 104 105 17 18 19 106107 20 21 22 23 24 25 108 2627 12 14 2' - 2 1/2"4' - 9 1/2"x32"80"109x32"80" 110 x60"80" 111 x36"80"112x36"80"114x36"80"113x36"80"115x36"80" 116 x36"80" 117 x36"80" 118 8'-11 3/4" CLG. HGT. 110' - 0"40' - 0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Main Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:21 PM 07Main Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD FLOOR TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT AT 19.2" O.C. FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-4 1/2" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE MAIN LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 15' - 6"12' - 6"1' - 0" 6X6 STRUCTURAL POSTS (ENG. TO VERIFY)BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. GUEST RM BATH EXST. MECH W.I.C. MUD ROOM LAUNDRYFAMILY ROOM FOYER KITCHEN GREAT ROOM POCKET OFFICE GARAGE STAIRS EXISTING DECK EXISTING SIDE DECK FRONT PORCH EXISTING BEARING WALL STEP DOWNEXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXST. DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM EXISTING DROPPED BEAM NEW FLOOR JOISTS (MATCH EXISTING)EXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMEXISTING DROPPED BEAMBEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVAC BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVAC ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.SIZE TO ALLOW FOR HVACOPEN TO ABOVE DINING OPEN TO ABOVE NEW BEAM PER MFG. SPEC.ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG.GARAGE DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.GARAGE DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. 1 12 3 12EXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSEXISTING 2X8 JOISTSBEAM FLUSHEDPER MFG. SPEC.LANDING BEAM PER MFG. LANDING BEAM PER MFG. 19' - 0"11' - 0"BEAM w/ CANOPY HANDERS PER MFG. SPEC.BEAM w/ CANOPY HANDERS PER MFG. SPEC.BRG. PT. FROM ABOVE18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.NEW WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:26 PM 08Main Level Structural MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Main Level Structural NOT AN OFFICAL STRUCTURAL PLAN. ALL BEAMS, HEADERS, AND GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN MUST BE SPECIFIED AND DETERMINED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY ENGINEER FOR FINAL LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND SPECS. ROOF/FLOOR GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NOT ALL NECESSARY GIRDERS MAY BE SHOWN. TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS OF GIRDER TRUSSES. SIZE BEAMS/HEADERS TO ALLOW FOR HVAC RUNS THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF HOME. GRAYED OUT FRAMED WALLS ARE 2X6 BEARING WALLS UNLESS NOTED FLOOR TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT AT 19.2” O.C. FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-4 1/2" UNLESS NOTED T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE structural notes:IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM EXISTING BALCONY AREA DECREASE WIDTH AS SHOWN REMOVE EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES OVER MAIN LEVEL. REPLACE WITH NEW UPPER LEVEL AS SHOWN DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:30 PM 09Upper Level Demo Plan MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Upper Level Demo Plan REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 36' - 6 1/2"7' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"22' - 6"34' - 0"11' - 0"29' - 0"4' - 0 1/2"2' - 11 1/2"3' - 0"7' - 6 5/8"9' - 5 3/8"8' - 6"10' - 6"3' - 0"7' - 0"7' - 0"11' - 8 3/4"14' - 11 1/4"17' - 10"6' - 0"5' - 0" 17' - 0"19' - 0"72' - 6" 25' - 6"11' - 0 1/2"3' - 8 3/4"3' - 8 3/4"4' - 0"4' - 0"6' - 6"13' - 9 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"6' - 6"5' - 6"5' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"5' - 0" 108' - 6"5' - 6"6"5' - 0"4' - 6"5' - 8 1/2"15' - 7"3' - 2 1/2"9' - 3 1/2"2' - 2 1/2"4' - 6"4' - 6"17' - 0"4' - 6"7' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 0"7' - 6"12' - 0"9' - 6"8' - 1"5' - 10"5' - 6 1/2"8' - 6 1/2"9' - 11 1/2" 9' - 10 1/2"5' - 8" 41 1/2"41 1/2"1' - 0 1/2"4' - 0"7' - 4"12' - 4 1/4"2' - 4 1/2"4' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 3/4"4' - 4 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"12' - 4 1/4"7' - 0 1/4"6' - 10 1/2"SD/CO SD/CO SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. SMOKE DET. OWNER'S SUITE OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOW OPEN TO DINING BELOW EXST. LOFT BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOMEXST. BALCONY CARPET FLOORING COMPOSITE DECKING CABLE RAILING CABLE RAILING CABLE RAILING WOOD FLOORING CARPET FLOORING 18" LIN.54" VANITYFAN 36"x60" TILE SHOWER BI-PASS DOOR R&S 4' - 1 3/4" CARPET FLOORING R&S 5' - 8 3/4"4' - 1 3/4" CARPET FLOORING STAIRS WOOD TREADS & RISERSCABLE RAILINGCABLE RAILINGFAN78" VANITY36"x60" TILETUB/SHWRBEV. REF. WET BAR CARPET FLOORING VAULTED CEILINGS2X6 WALL2X6 PLMG WALL2X6 WALL2X6 PLMG WALL2X6 WALLFLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 10' - 6 1/2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR ELEVATION 2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEMNEW FLOOR SYSTEM1 13 NEW LOFT WOOD FLOORING 1 12 3 1219 3/4"EXISTING BALCONY AREA DECREASE WIDTH AS SHOWN EXISTING EXPOSED BEAM @ MAIN LEVEL CLG. STORAGE SPACE STORAGE SPACE STORAGE SPACE INDICATES NEW WALLS INDICATES EXISTING WALLS (UNDISTURBED OR MODIFIED) TILE FLOOR OPEN BELOW SHELVING LINEN SHELVING4' - 3"2' - 4 1/2"16'-0" DRY BAR LINE OF VAULTLINE OF VAULT 16"16" NEW 8'-6" VANITY NEW 36"x60" FREE STANDING TUBNEW LINEN NEW LINEN NEW 84"x42" TILE SHOWER w/ CORNER BENCH10' - 7 3/4"EXISTING CLOSET 10' - 8"6' - 0 3/4" WALL SHOULD STACK w/ KITCHEN/MECH. WALL BELOW EQEQ 28 29 21830313233 34 35 3637 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 464748 495051 52 5354555658 59 606162 63 40' - 0"11' - 6"57x30"80"201x36"80"202x30"80" 203x30"80"204x60"80" 205 x30"80" 208 x48"80" 207x30"80"206x72"80" 210 x30"80"211x72"80" 209 x30"80"212x30"80" 213 x36"80"214x36"80" 215 x36"80" 216 x36"80" 217 BATH TILE 40' - 0"108' - 6" OWNER'S BATH TILE FLOOR 3' - 6"36 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Upper Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:36 PM 10Upper Level MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TO CENTER OF STUD ROOF TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT @ 24” O.C. ROOF SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-1 1/8" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE upper LEVEL NOTES: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM OWNER'S SUITE OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOW OPEN TO DINING BELOW EXST. CLOSET OWNER'S BATH LOFT BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOM BALCONY ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.DOOR HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.2 13 3 15 1 15 2 15 3 13 1 14 3 14 2 14 1 13 1 12 3 12 ATTIC ACCESS ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. BATH W.I.C. VAULT LINE VAULT LINEWINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC.WINDOW HDR. PER MFG. SPEC. DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:40 PM 11Upper Level Structural MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Upper Level Structural NOT AN OFFICAL STRUCTURAL PLAN. ALL BEAMS, HEADERS, AND GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN MUST BE SPECIFIED AND DETERMINED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY ENGINEER FOR FINAL LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND SPECS. ROOF/FLOOR GIRDER TRUSSES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NOT ALL NECESSARY GIRDERS MAY BE SHOWN. TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO DETERMINE FINAL LOCATIONS OF GIRDER TRUSSES. SIZE BEAMS/HEADERS TO ALLOW FOR HVAC RUNS THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF HOME. GRAYED OUT FRAMED WALLS ARE 2X6 BEARING WALLS UNLESS NOTED ROOF TRUSSES ARE CALLED OUT @ 24” O.C. ROOF SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SPACING AND ADJUST AS ALLOWED BY SPANS TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO VERIFY ALL ENERGY HEELS SHOWN TO ENSURE FINAL EAVE FRAMING DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH FINISHED EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. CEILING HEIGHT @ 8'-1 1/8" UNLESS NOTED (VERIFY EXISTING) T.O. WINDOW FRAMES SET @ HEIGHT NOTED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE structural notes: IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM Existing Upper Level Clg. Hgt.8' - 1 1/8"8"Existing Main Level Clg. Hgt.8' - 4 1/2"8"EXST. 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXST. 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEMEXST. BALCONYNew Energy Heel26 1/4"8" 12" 3' - 0" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING DECK EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst. 12 2 New Overhang 3' - 0" 8" 12"New Energy Heel26 1/4"2X 6 T R U S S T A I L S 2X 4 L O O K O U T S Sub Fascia17 1/2"EXST. WALLMETAL DRIP EDGE 4/4" x 8" TRIM 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" FASICA 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" SUB FASICA CO M P O S I T E V E N T E D S O F F I T S TYPICAL EAVE CONSTRUCTION: ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES #15FELT & ICE & WATER SHIELD (6'-0") 1/2" OSB SHEATHING w/STEEL CLIPS TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (PER MFG. SPEC.) BAFFLES w/1" AIR SPACE 2X4 LOOKOUTS 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 4/4" x 8" FASCIA ON 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISITNGNew Energy Heel30 1/4"3' - 0" 8" 12" ROOF, CEILING & EAVE CONSTRUCTION: WALL CONSTRUCTION: FOUNDATION WALL & BASEMENT SLAB CONSTRUCTION: MAIN LEVEL CONSTRUCTION: UPPER LEVEL CONSTRUCTION: ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES #15FELT & ICE & WATER SHIELD (6'-0") 1/2" OSB SHEATHING w/STEEL CLIPS TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. (PER MFG. SPEC.) BAFFLES w/1" AIR SPACE 2X4 LOOKOUTS 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 4/4" x 8" FASCIA ON 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS R-50 BLOWN INSULATION POLY VAPOR BARRIER 5/8" GYP. BRD. CEILING 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GLUED & SCREWED 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. (FLOOR SYSTEM DESIGNER TO VERIFY SIZE & SPACING BASED ON SPANS) 5/8" GYP. BRD. ON CEILING SPRAY INSULATE RIMS (R-21) SIDING PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP (WRAP WINDOWS PER MFG. SPEC.) 1/2" OSB SHEATHING 2X6 STUDS @16" O.C. DBL. TOP PLATE R-21 WALL INSULATION 4 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BRD. 2X6 SOLE PLATE ALL DETAILS TO CONFORM W/ ENERGY CODE AS EXISTING AS EXISTING8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING New 3' - 0" 2' - 9 1/4"2 3/4" METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 15-1/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 15 1/8"4/4" x 10" COMP. FASCIA 2X4 BLOCKING CANOPY HANGERS PER ENG. SPEC.BEAM PERMFG. SPEC.2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X4 LOOKOUTS EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE 3/4" PLYWOOD (PITCHED @ 1/4" SLOPE MIN.) WEDGE BLOCK COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFIT TYPICAL FLAT EAVE w/ CABLES: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE (EXTEND MEMBRANE 12"-18" UP/DN ABUDDING WALLS/ROOFS) 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEDGE BLOCK 2X4 LOOKOUTS @ 24" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 5/4" x 8" COMPOSITE FASICA w/ METAL DRIP EDGE 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 10" COMPOSITE FASCIA 15-1/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA 2X4 BLOCKING COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS FLOOR TRUSSES PER PLAN 1' - 6 3/4"12" 2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X4 LOOKOUTS 16 7/8"METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMP. FASCIA 16-7/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING @ 1/4" SLOPE MIN.Energy Heel11 3/8"COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS FLAT EAVE @ BONUS ROOM: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE (EXTEND MEMBRANE 12"-18" UP/DN ABUDDING WALLS/ROOFS) 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING w/ WEDGE BLOCK 2X4 LOOKOUTS @ 24" O.C. 5/4" x 8" COMPOSITE FASICA w/ METAL DRIP EDGE 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMPOSITE FASCIA 16-7/8" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:45 PM 12Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/2" = 1'-0" 1Typical Wall Section 1 1" = 1'-0" 2Detail - Typical Eave 1/2" = 1'-0" 3Typical Wall Section 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 5 Detail - Typical Eave w/ Hangers 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 6 Detail - Flat Eave @ Bonus Rm IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"3' - 6"12 5Heel18 1/4"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.NewNew New 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.2' - 0" 8" 12" 8" 12"4' - 0 1/2"Ceiling Height Varies w/ Vault2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE Heel18 5/16"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. BATHLAUNDRYFAMILY ROOM GARAGE NEW 2x10 JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING BDRM #2 BDRM #3 BONUS ROOM NOTE: NEW EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER. MATCH EXISTING HEIGHT GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. 18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 10' - 11 1/2"51' - 6"9' - 11 1/2"Upper Level to Apex of Vault11' - 0 13/16"New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" 3' - 0"6"NEW CRAWL SPACE6 1/4"BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor 0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"6 1/4"1' - 6"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"7' - 5 3/4"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. EXISTING BEAMS Exst.Exst. New New 4' - 0 1/2"NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISTING BEAM OR GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.3' - 6"New Heel13 5/8"MUD ROOM FAMILY ROOM DININGGREAT ROOM GARAGE 3/4" SUBFLOOR 2X6 TRD. JOISTS @ 16" O.C. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" 8" 12"Heel18 5/16"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. OWNER'S SUITEBDRM #2 BDRM #3 BONUS ROOM EXISTING CRAWL SPACEEXISTING CRAWL SPACE NEW GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. 1 8 "18"18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 36" 24" 12" 12" FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEAD DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS 10' - 11 1/2"23' - 0 1/2"28' - 5 1/2"45' - 11 1/2" BDRM #3 CLOSET New First Floor Clg. 8' - 11 3/4"Ceiling Height Varies w/ Vault2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"Upper Level to Apex of Vault8" 12"6"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA W/ SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Lowered First Floor-0' - 6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"11' - 0 3/4"12 6 Heel11 3/8"Heel11 3/8"Heel40 3/4"NEW SCISSOR TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 2' - 0" 3 1/2" 12" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE T.O. GARAGE FOUNDATION TO MATCH EXISTING GARAGE 3' - 6"3' - 6"BONUS ROOM GARAGE 8" 12" 3' - 0" GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS OVERHEADR DOOR OVER POLY/VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND BED GRANULAR FILL GARAGE WALLS: INSULATE WALLS & CEILINGS 5/8" TYPE-X GYP. BD. & FINISH TAPE ON ALL INTERIOR GARAGE WALLS & CEILINGS FLOOR OVER GARAGE: -HEAT DUCT & SEWER WRAPPED & FOAMED -HOLD HEAT DUCT & SEWER TIGHT TO SUBFLOOR -BLOWN INSULATION (R-49) 10' - 8 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" 2" 12"Upper Level to Apex of Vault9' - 9 9/16"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:50 PM 13Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Family Rm/Garage 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Section - Great Room/Garage 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Section - Garage REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.New 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"Heel30 1/4"3' - 0" 14 4 3' - 6"2' - 0 3/4"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"7' - 0"2' - 6" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" FRONT PORCH PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG. FAMILY ROOM FOYER BDRM #2NEW LOFT New BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 22' - 2 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC. New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" EXST. DECK4"Existing Second Floor 10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Lowered First Floor-0' - 6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 6"Heel11 3/8"Heel30 1/4"3 1/2" 12" 8" 12"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"9' - 6"3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.3' - 6"2' - 0 3/4"9' - 2"NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. New BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. FRONT PORCH PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG. 9' - 6" GUEST RMLAKE BATH BDRM #3 BDRM #4 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 14 4 Sim NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER. MATCH EXISTING 22' - 2 1/2"10' - 8 1/2" New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4"4"NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISITNG FLOOR SYSTEM NEW CRAWL SPACE NEW DROPPED BEAM PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor 0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"29' - 0"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING CRAWL SPACE EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM2' - 0 3/4"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"PORCH FLAT ROOF: EPDM RUBBER MEMBRANE RIGID INSULATION @ 1/4" SLOPE 3/4" SHEATHING 24" ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. OPT. PINE T&G CLG.3' - 6"12"12" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. Exst.Exst.New EXST. MECH KITCHENPOCKET OFFICE FRONT PORCH OPEN TO KITCHEN BELOWOWNER'S BATH 28' - 10"36' - 5 1/2" NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 3' - 0"11 11/16"2X4 LOOKOUTS 2X 4 T R U S S T A I L S Energy Heel30 1/4"METAL DRIP EDGE 5/4" x 8" COMP. FASCIA 3/4" BACKING 4/4" x 12" COMP. FASCIA 17-1/2" x 1-1/4" RIM BOARD SUB FASCIA COMPOSITE VENTED SOFFITS 8" 12" DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:37:56 PM 14Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Family Rm/Front Porch 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Section - Lake Bath/Front Porch 1/4" = 1'-0" 3Section - Pocket Office/Front Porch 1" = 1'-0" 4 Detail - Eave @ New Loft IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor 1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg. 9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"3' - 0"3' - 0"Heel26 1/4"Heel26 1/4"New Window Hgt.16' - 0 1/2"New Window Hgt.16' - 0 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"6' - 10 1/2"EXST. BEAMS EXST. BEAM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM 8" 12" NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE Exst.Exst. DININGKITCHEN loft NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 14' - 5 1/2"14' - 5 1/2" Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2"Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof 18' - 7 5/8" Exst. Raised First Floor1' - 6" Exst. Raised First Floor Clg.9' - 10 1/2"8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"4' - 0 1/2"4' - 0 1/2"3/4" SUBFLOOR 24" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC.8' - 1 1/8"8"8' - 4 1/2"8"EXISTING BEAMS EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X8 FLOOR SYSTEM10 3/4"7' - 5 3/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C.6 1/4"1' - 6"Heel18 5/16"Heel18 5/16"18"1 8 "3' - 6"NewNew Exst.Exst. ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE 18" PARALLEL CHORD TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" 3' - 0"3' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 0"1' - 0"8' - 11 3/4"New GUEST RM MUD ROOMFOYER DININGGREAT ROOM GARAGE OWNER'S SUITEEXST. LOFT BDRM #4 BATH BONUS ROOMNEW LOFT 7' - 4 13/16"10' - 11 1/2"10' - 11 1/2"Upper Level to Apex of Vault11' - 0 13/16"New First Floor Clg. 8' - 11 3/4"2' - 0 3/4"T.O. Foundation to B.O. Trusses8' - 11 1/4"GRADE MUST BE MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL B.O. FOOTING @ MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION: 4" CONCRETE SLAB PITCHED TOWARDS FLOOR DRAINS SAND BED GRANULAR FILL6"ZERO ENTRY GARAGE SLAB INTO HOUSE NEW CRAWL SPACE TO MATCH EXISTING NEW 2x10 JOISTS TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE: PROVIDE NEW CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA W/ SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER BEAM DROPPED PER MFG. SPEC. Existing First Floor0' - 0" Existing Second Floor10' - 6 1/2" Roof18' - 7 5/8"Heel6 1/4"8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"10"PROPOSED GIRDER TRUSS PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC.NEW ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. 8" 12" EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM EXISTING 2X10 FLOOR SYSTEM 3/4" SUBFLOOR 18" FLOOR TRUSSES @ 19.2" O.C. BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. EXISTING CRAWL SPACE 11"7 7/16"5' - 7"4' - 11 1/2"TYPICAL STAIRCASE CONSTRUCTION: 6'-10" MINIMUM HEADROOM (4) 11- 7/8" STAIR STRINGER w/1-1/8" x 11-1/4" PARTICLE BOARD TREADS PROVIDE 34"-36" HGT HANDRAILS & GUARDS RAILS PER CODE TYPICAL STAIRCASE LANDING CONSTRUCTION: 2-2x8 HEADER 3/4" PLYWOOD BACKING 2x8 JOISTS @ 16" O.C. 3/4" PLYWOOD FAMILY ROOM STAIRS BDRM #2NEW LOFT 3' - 6"8' - 7 3/4"6 1/4"6' - 6" BEAM FLUSHED PER MFG. SPEC. New New Exst. NOTE: PROVIDE EXISTING CRAWL SPACE & FOUNDATION AREA TO BE SEALED WITH VAPOR BARRIER 13' - 8 1/2"22' - 2 1/2" LANDING BEAMS PER MFG. 6" New First Floor Clg.8' - 11 3/4" EXST. DECK 8' - 1 1/8"1' - 6 3/4"8' - 11 3/4"DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:01 PM 15Cross Sections MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1Section - Dining/Kitchen 1/4" = 1'-0" 2Section - Owner's Suite/Bonus Room 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Section - Stairs/Family Room IMPORTANT REMODEL NOTE: VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ROOF. VERIFY FLOOR AND WALL HEIGHTS IN THE EFFECTED AREA PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF SHEATHING ALL OVERALL DIMENSION LINES TO BE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF SHEATHING VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS AND SIZES OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: WALL STUDS, FLOOR JOISTS, SUB FLOOR, AND ROOF TRUSSES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION FIELD VERIFY OVERHANGS AND ROOF PITCH PRIOR TO ORDERING ROOF TRUSSES OR STARTING CONSTRUCTION ALL MODIFICATIONS AND NEW LOADS APPLIED TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE WILL BE VERIFIED BY AN ENGINEER WHO WILL PROVIDED DRAWING AND SPECIFICS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SIGNATURE IS NEEDED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ORONO FOR APPROVAL. ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THAT ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT MEET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM CDRev4 2.16.2023 LMC ABBREVIATIONS LIST = AIR CONDITIONING = ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR = ALUMINIUM = BOTTOM CHORD BEARING = BOARD = BEDROOM = BUILT IN = BEAM = BOTTOM OF = BEARING = BASEMENT = CABINETS = CANTLIEVER = CEILING = CENTER LINE = CASED OPENING = CONCRETE = CONTINUOUS = CARPET = CERAMIC TILE = CASEMENT = DOUBLE = DEMOLISH OR DEMOLITION = DOUBLE HUNG = DIAMETER = DIMENSION(S) = DOWN = DRYWALL OPENING = DOOR = DISHWASHER = DRAWING = EACH = ENERGY HEEL = ELECTRIC = ELEVATIONS OR ELEVATOR = ENGINEER = ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE M-CLASS = EQUAL = EXTERIOR = EXISTING = FLOOR DRAIN = FINISHED = FLOOR = FOUNDATION = FIREPLACE = FRAMING = FREEZER = FOOTING = FURNITURE = FUTURE = FIXED = GLIDER = GIRDER TRUSS = GYPSUM = GYPSUM BOARD = HEADER = HEIGHT = HEATING VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING = IN FLOOR HEAT = INSULATION = INTERIOR = LANDING = LINEN = LOCKERS = LOWER LEVEL = LOOKOUT = LUXURY VINYL TILE = LUXURY VINYL PLANK = MAXIMUM = MECHANICAL = MANUFACTURE(R) = MINIMUM = MAIN LEVEL = MASONRY OPENING = NUMBER = NOMINAL = ON CENTER = OFFICE = OPENING = OPTION(AL) = POLISHED CONCRETE = PERIMETER = POCKET = PLUMBING = PLYWOOD = POWDER = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE = REFRIGERATOR = REQUIRED = ROOM = ROD & SHELF = SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE = SMOKE DETECTOR = SMOKE / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR = SINGLE HUNG = SHELVING = SHELVES = SIMILAR OR SIMULATOR = SLIDER = SINK = SPECIFICATION(S) OR SPECIFIED = STEEL = STORAGE = STRUCTURAL = SQUARE FOOTAGE = TO BE DETERMINED = TOP CHORD BEARING = TONGUE AND GROOVE = TOP OF = TREATED = TRANSOM = TYPICAL = UPPER LEVEL = UNFINISHED = VANITY = WOOD = WINDOW = WALK IN CLOSET = WITH = WALKOUT = WASHER A.C. A.F.F. ALUM. B.C.B. BD. BDRM. B.I. B'M B.O. BRG. BSMT. CABS. CANT. CLG. C.L. C.O. CONC. CONT. CPT. C.T. CSMT DBL. DEMO D.H. DIA. DIM(S) DN. D.O. DR. D.W. DWG. EA. E.H. ELEC. ELEV. ENG. EPDM EQ. EXT. EXST. F.D. FIN. FLR. FND. F/P FRMG. FRZ. FTG. FURN. FUT. FX. GLD. G.T. GYP. GYP. BD. HDR. HGT. HVAC I.F.H. INSUL. INT. LDG. LIN. LKRS. L.L. L.O. L.V.T. L.V.P. MAX. MECH. MFG. MIN. M.L. M.O. NO. NOM. O.C. OFF. OP'NG OPT. P. CONC. PERM. PKT. PLMG. PLWD. PWDR PVC REF. REQD RM. R&S S.D.L. SD. SD/CO S.H. SHLVG. SHLVS. SIM. SLD. SNK SPEC. ST'L ST'RG STRUC. SQ. FTG. TBD. T.C.B. T&G T.O. TRD. TRSM. TYP. U.L. UNFIN. VTY. W'D WDW W.I.C. W/ W.O. WSHR. DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:06 PM 16Schedules & Notes MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 2. ALL INTERIOR WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2x4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 3. WALLS ADJACENT TO GARAGE SPACE SHALL BE 2x6 WITH A 1 HR. FIRE RATING 4. STRUCTURAL WALLS TO HAVE A FIRE RATING OF 1 HR. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS LINES TO BE TO CENTERLINE OF STUDS TO FACE OF STUD 6. PROVIDE ROOF VENTILATION 1 SQ.FT. PER 300 SQ.FT. OF ROOF AREA. 50% AT RIDGE AND 50% AT SOFFIT-MIN 7.ALL INTERIOR DOOR HEAD HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. UNDERCUT MIN 1" 8. ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO BE VERIFIED BY MANF. AND A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 9. ALL WINDOW UNITS ABOVE TUB DECK AND/OR WITHIN 18" OF THE FLOOR AND/OR 24" OF A DOORWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS 10. PROVIDE AN APPROVED ICE AND WATER ROOFING STARTER EDGE PER CODE OR EQUIVALENT 11. WRAP ALL CANTILEVERS WITH AN APPROVED POLY AND SPRAY FOAM FLOOR 12. SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AWAY FROM THE HOUSE ON ALL SIDES 13. 1/2" AIR SPACE ON EACH SIDE OF MICRO-LAM BEAM & MIN 3" BEARING ON CONCRETE 14. EXTERIOR RAILING TO BE MIN OF 36" HIGH AND BUILT AS TO NOT ALLOW A 4" SPHERE TO PASS THROUGH 15. ALL COMPONENTS TO BE INSTALLED TO MANF. SPEC OR LOCAL CODE 16. ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY IS TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD SPECIES THAT HAS A NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY 17. PROVIDE A WATER RESISTIVE GYP BOARD AROUND ALL SHOWERS AND TUBS 18. LIGHT OR FAN HOUSING SYSTEM RECESSED THROUGH AN EXTERIOR VAPOR BARRIER SHALL BE OF THE AIR SEALED TYPE OR BE BOXED AND SEALED PER CODE 19. PROVIDE DRAFT STOPS PER UBC 708.3 20. FIRE BLOCK ALL CHASES AT EACH FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY OR AT 10' MAX INTERVALS 21. ALL SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE HARD WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP PER CODE 22. MAINTAIN A 6" SEPARATION BETWEEN GRADE AND WOOD 23. CAULK AND FLASH AROUND ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS 24. PLUMBING PENETRATIONS IN WALL ASSEMBLY SHALL BE FIRE CAULKED WITH LISTED MATERIALS 25. BLOCK PATIO DOORS WITHOUT A DECK 26. SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE MIN 16" AWAY FROM WALL AND INSTALL TO MANF. SPEC 27. NO OPENING IN ROOF WITHIN 5' OF PROPERTY LINES 28. 10% OF THE FLOOR AREA IS REQUIRED FOR LIGHT AND VENTILATION IN ALL HABITABLE ROOMS 29. ON EXTERIOR, GRIPPABLE HANDRAILS 34" TO 36" IN HEIGHT FROM THE NOSE OF THE STAIRS 30. COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS 12" OFF THE FLOOR OR RETURN AIR PLENUM WHEN REQUIRED (IMC703) 31. PROVIDE PLUMBING ACCESS AT ALL TUBS EXCEPT WHEN TRAPS & OVERFLOW GLUED 32. PROVIDE 50 cfm OR 20 cfm CONTINUOUS VENTILATION OR OPERABLE WINDOW (ASHRAE 62-2001 6.1) 33. DRYER VENT TO THE EXTERIOR- INSULATE LAST 3 FEET MIN 36" CLEARANCE TO OTHER OPENINGS: (IMC504.4, 401.52 AND 604.1) 34. CERAMIC TILE TO BE APPLIED OVER GREEN BOARD, CEMENT BOARD, WONDER BOARD OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL TO A HEIGHT OF 70" ABOVE DRAIN INLET IN SHOWERS. CEMENT BOARD MUST BE USED ON EXTERIOR WALLS UNDERNEATH TILE AND OVER THE VAPOR BARRIER (R307) 35. TRUSS PLANS STAMPED AND APPROVED BY MANF. SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE. ALTERATIONS TO TRUSSES REQUIRE AN ENGINEER'S APPROVAL 36. RAFTERS SHALL BE FRAMED TO MIN 1" THICK RIDGE BOARD NOT LESS THAN THE DEPTH OF THE CUT END OF THE RAFTERS OR NAILED TO EACH OTHER WITH A GUSSET PLATE A TIE. THE RIDGE BOARD MUST BE SUPPORTED ON END WALL OR MIN 2x4 COLLAR TIES ARE REQUIRED AT MIN 4" O.C. 37. 4-MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON WARM IN WINTER SIDE OF EXTERIOR WALLS AND CEILING. FIRE RETARDANT VAPOR BARRIER MAY BE LEFT UNCOVERED 38. WIND-WASH AT AL EAVES, CORNERS, OVERHANGS, AND BY WINDOWS. SHEATHING INSULATION DAM @ CEILING CHANGES 39. WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER-i.e. BUILDING WRAP TABLE R703.4 40. HOT WATER PIPING LOCATED OUTSIDE OF CONDITIONED SPACE WILL BE INSULATED TO AT LEAST R-3 41. ATTIC ACCESS DOORS FROM CONDITIONED TO UNCONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE WEATHERED- STRIPPED AND INSULATED. 42. NEW WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES WILL HAVE TIGHT-FITTING FLUE DAMPERS AND OUTDOOR COMBUSTION AIR. 43. FOR WINDOWS WHERE THE LOWEST PART OF THE WINDOW OPENING IS MORE THAN 6' ABOVE THE GROUND, THE LOWEST PART OF OPENING SHALL BE MIN. OF 36" ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE WINDOWS THAT DO NOT OPEN MORE THAN 4", WINDOWS WITH FALL PROTECTION, AND WINDOWS THAT HAVE OPENING CONTROL DEVICES. 44. DWELLINGS WITH ATTACHED GARAGES OR FUEL FIRED EQUIPMENT MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS OUTSIDE OF, BUT NO FURTHER THAN 10' FROM , EACH SLEEPING AREA OR BEDROOM. 45. FOOTINGS SHALL HAVE A MIN. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5,000 psi. 46. A MIN. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD MEMBRANE, OR 5/8" WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL MEMBRANE, SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR ASSEMBLIES. EXCEPTIONS A.DWELLINGS EQUIPPED WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM. B.CRAWLSPACES C.PORTIONS OF FLOOR ASSEMBLIES WITH PROPORTIONALLY SMALL AREA. D. FLOOR ASSEMBLIES CONSTRUCTED OF SOLID SAWN LUMBER OR STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE LUMBER WITH MIN. NOMINAL DIMENSIONS OF 2"x10". 47. DECKS SUPPORTED BY ATTACHMENT TO AN EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE POSITIVELY ANCHORED TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND DESIGNED FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND LATERAL LOADS. 48. FLASHING WITH A MIN. 3 1/2" VERTICAL ATTACHMENT FLANGE IS REQUIRED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE FOUNDATION AND RIM JOIST FRAMING WHEN THE EXTERIOR WALL COVERING DOES NOT LAP THE FOUNDATION INSULATION. THE FLASHING MUST EXTEND A MIN. OF 1" BELOW THE FOUNDATION PLATE LINE, AND THE REQUIRED WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER MUST LAP OVER THE ATTACHMENT FLANGE. 49. BUILDING FRAMING CAVITIES SHALL NOT BE USED AS DUCTS OR PLENUMS D O O R S C H E D U L E Tag Door Size Door Type Quantity Head Height Level 101 ELSFD12070 Marvin Elevate Sliding French 4-Panel 1 7' - 2"Exst. Raised First Floor 102 UBFLD9080-3P Marvin Ultimate Bi-Fold 1 7' - 11 1/2"Existing First Floor 103 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Lowered First Floor 104 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Lowered First Floor 105 9'-0" x 8'-0"Single Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 106 18'-0" x 8'-0"Double Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 107 9'-0" x 8'-0"Single Overhead Garage Door 1 8' - 0"Grade 108 ELIFD3080 Marvin Elevate Inswing French 1-Panel 1 7' - 11 1/2"Existing First Floor 109 32" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Exst. Raised First Floor 110 32" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Exst. Raised First Floor 111 60" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 112 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 113 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 114 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 115 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing First Floor 116 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 117 36" x 80"Fire Door - 20min. Rated 1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 118 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Lowered First Floor 201 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 202 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 203 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 204 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 205 60" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 206 30" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 207 48" x 80"Double Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 208 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 209 72" x 80"Double Bi-Pass Door (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 210 72" x 80"Double Bi-Pass Door (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 211 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 212 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 213 30" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 214 36" x 80"Single Pocket (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 215 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 216 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 217 36" x 80"Single Swing (Interior)1 6' - 8"Existing Second Floor 218 USPD12070 Marvin Ultimate Sliding Patio 3-Panel 1 7' - 2"Existing Second Floor Grand total: 36 M A R V I N W I N D O W S C H E D U L E TagWindow CodeWindow TypeQuantity Head Height Level Room Location 01ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 02ELAWN5763Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 03ELCAP7363Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 04ELCAP7319Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 05ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 06ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 07ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 08ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 09ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 10ELAWN4919Marvin Elevate Awning 1 1' - 8 7/8"Exst. Raised First Floor 11ELCA3771Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 12ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 2' - 0 7/8"Existing First Floor 13ELCA3771Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 14ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 2' - 0 7/8"Existing First Floor 15ELCA3355Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 16ELCA3355Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 17ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 18ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 19ELCAP3371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Grade 20ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 21ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 22ELCA3371Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 23ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 24ELCA3371Marvin Elevate Casement 1 8' - 0"Lowered First Floor 25ELCAP5771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 8' - 0"Existing First Floor 26ELCA3343Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 27ELCAP5747Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Exst. Raised First Floor 28ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 29ELCAP7363Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 30ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 31ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 32ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 33ELCAP3763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 34ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 35ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 36ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 2 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 37ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 38ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 39ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 40ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 41ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 42ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 43ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 44ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 45ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 46ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 47ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 48ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 49ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 50ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 51ELAWN3719Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 52ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 53ELAWN3323Marvin Elevate Awning 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 54ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 55ELCAP4963Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 56ELCA3363Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 57ELCAP5771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 58ELCA3763Marvin Elevate Casement 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 59ELCAP3771Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 60ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 61ELCAP7371Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 62ELCAP4971Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor 63ELCAP5763Marvin Elevate Casement Picture 1 7' - 0"Existing Second Floor Total Windows: 64 REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM 1155 SF EXISTING DECK 2318 SF EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 899 SF NEW GARAGE 172 SF FRONT PORCH ADDITION 24 SF STAIR ADDITION 1060 SF EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 2090 SF UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 85 SF EXISTING BALCONY 1/8" = 1'-0" 1Main Level 1/8" = 1'-0" 2Upper Level DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION PROJECT # PROJECT ISSUE RE-ISSUE BUILDER a18476 KENRICK AVE. SUITE #202 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com D A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N SD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N S Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a licensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2023. Do not replicate with out permission (952)-428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown. 2/16/2023 3:38:11 PM 17Square Footage Calculations MISC - Beduhn - CD Beduhn Remodel BUILDER BY HOMEOWNER1.12.2022GM 1340 Vine Place Orono, MN S Q. F T G. C A L C S. Name Sq. Ftg.Level Area Type EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 2318 SF Existing First Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. STAIR ADDITION 24 SF Existing First Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 1060 SF Existing Second Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 2090 SF Existing Second Floor FINISHED SQ. FTG. FINISHED SQ. FTG.5492 SF EXISTING DECK 1155 SF Existing First Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. FRONT PORCH ADDITION 172 SF Existing First Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. EXISTING BALCONY 85 SF Existing Second Floor OUTDOOR SQ. FTG. OUTDOOR SQ. FTG.1411 SF NEW GARAGE 899 SF Existing First Floor UNCONDITIONED SQ. FTG. UNCONDITIONED SQ. FTG.899 SF REVISION SCHEDULE Number Date Issued by CDRev1 1.18.2023 GM CDRev2 1.24.2023 JCB CDRev3 2.2.2023 GM MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 12 property owner for first right of refusal, which is another precedent. At this point all we are really deciding is whether we are advising Council to approve vacation. I am supportive. Kirchner said he has nothing to add other than to support it. Erickson said from a motorist and resident standpoint it is a tremendous improvement over what was there before. I certainly appreciate the efforts of the property owner and the county and City staff and everyone working together to come up with a finished product that's top quality. McCutchen moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000002, 1449 Shoreline Drive, Vacation. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 2. LA23-000008 DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS, 1340 VINE PLACE, VARIANCES City Planner Nye said the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and rebuild on the existing foundation which is non-conforming. The lot is substandard in size and is just over maximum hardcover of 25 percent. The proposed home will be larger and taller with adding a second story and roof pitch and a new front porch addition. It is proposed to demolish a 2-car detached garage and construct a three-car attached garage in a similar location. The lot is not buildable which is a practical difficulty. The proposal would bring hard cover into compliance. In order for the applicant to construct the new home they will need variances from lot area, average lakeshore setback. 75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot setback and rear yard setback. Staff is supportive of this request due to the practical difficulties. Kirchner asked about expansion of the footprint. Nye said there would be a slight expansion due to a new, larger garage in the same place as the existing garage. David Zweber, David Charlez Designs, Lakeville, explained it was a difficult property because of the location on an inlet and existing setback rules make it nearly impossible to construct anything in conformance. The existing property is in disrepair and new construction will make it a better property. The proposed new home will bring the hardcover down to within conforming levels, he said, and will not be adding a larger footprint per se, but simply stacking some square footage in a two story fashion to pick up the additional area that the client is needing for their growing family. Attaching the garage also will be a much nicer improvement to the existing structure. Because of the location of the neighboring properties, the neighbor to the northwest is significantly elevated over this property and looking down upon the property currently, so adding a story will not block any views. The property to the southeast will not be affected. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. Kirchner said he feels practical difficulties are established and attaching a garage in place of a detached to new construction is not egregious. I don’t see any concerns with the project in my opinion. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 12 Kraemer said it looks like a good addition to the property and getting hardcover lowered overall is good. Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000008 1340 Vine Place, variances. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000014 SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON, 1007 WILDHURST TRAIL, VARIANCE City Planner Curtis said the application is to create a new lot at 1007 Wildhurst Trail. The existing home and lot at 1003 Wildhurst would remain and is not part of this application. The applicant is in the process of designing a new home for the 1007 lot. West Branch Road results in the average Lakeshore setback line bisecting the center of the new lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction up to the 75-foot setback. Approval would be subject to the County approving the lot line changes. The applicants have identified the unique lake channel orientation for both the new lot and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch Road to the north as creating difficulties. Applicants are in attendance. Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the properties along the lakeshore channels create an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property which is restricting development near the lake. Staff recommends the planning commission should discuss whether the proposal fits within the character of neighborhood, whether practical difficulties exist, and. whether or not there is any lake view impact to consider. Staff recommends approval. Bollis clarified that the proposal would meet the 75-foot setback but it’s the average setback for which the variance is being requested. Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, said there are currently three PIDs on this property. There is a large, undeveloped chunk of land I purchased when there was talk of putting seven or eight houses in there and neighbors wanted to keep density lower. So in an effort to reduce the density of this area, my proposal was to bring it down to two lots. And then in doing so, the average lakeshore setback gets connected from the property to the north, and then connects to my own property that I also own. Average lakeshore setback was intended to keep the relationship between neighbors and lake. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. Kirchner said it reminded him of another case a few months ago. In reality, we are looking at a two-lot application here, not a three-lot. McCutcheon said if it was three we wouldn’t be talking about this. One house is extremely on the west side but since they are combining, it’s a lakeshore lot. Where the house is located now it makes a lot of sense. As you look at the neighborhood to the south they are all about that distance from the lake, so I think it fits the character of the neighborhood. Bollis said it goes back to the intent of the ordinance. I don’t think it creates an issue with sight lines. Date Application Received: 03/07/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/15/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/17/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: April 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000008, David Charlez Designs – David Zweber, 1340 Vine Place Variances for Lot Area, Average Lakeshore Setback, 75-Foot Lakeshore Setback, Hardcover within the 75-Foot Lakeshore Setback, and Rear Yard Setback - Public Hearing Background The existing home on the property was constructed prior to current regulations and is nonconforming. Much of the existing home is located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback (noted in blue in Figure 1) and in front of the average lakeshore setback line (noted in red in Figure 1). The compliant building envelope is not reasonably sized for the construction of a new home. The parcel is substandard in size at 0.66 acres, where one acre is required. A lot area variance is required for the reconstruction of the home. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing home to the foundation and use the existing foundation to construct a new home. The proposed home larger and taller than the existing home, which is clearly depicted is in the volume comparisons found in Exhibit G. The height difference is due to a steeper roof pitch and the addition of a second story above portions of the home that were once a single story. Also, the applicant is proposing to construct an attached three-car garage while demolishing the existing two-car detached garage in a similar location. The attached garage addition will be located within the 75-foot setback. There will also be an addition of a front porch which requires a rear yard setback variance. In order to construct the new home, the applicant is requesting variances from lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, and rear yard setback. The project is proposing to decrease the overall hardcover and bring the property into conformance. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for lot area, average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lakeshore setback, hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, and rear yard setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Figure 1 FILE #LA23-000008 April 17, 2023 Page 2 of 7 Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the location of the property on the inside corner of an inlet bay as a practical difficulty. The lakeshore setbacks coupled with the required setbacks of the LR-1B zoning district allow for a very small building envelope. Said building envelope is not large enough for the construction of a new home. The applicant has also identified the placement of the existing home within the required lakeshore setbacks as a practical difficulty. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant’s assessment. The location of the property and substandard size creates practical difficulties when adhering to the zoning districts setbacks as well as the 75-foot lakeshore setback and average lakeshore setback. The permitted building envelope is not sufficient for the construction of a new single-family home. The unique lot shape and substandard size as well as the placement of the existing structures are all practical difficulties when remodeling or constructing a new home on the lot. The proposal is to tear down the existing home and detached garage and use the existing foundation to construct a new home. Additional square footage will be added in the form of an attached garage and a second story. The proposal will bring the lot into conformance with hardcover bringing the property down from 25.01% to 23.68% total hardcover. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 – Setbacks: LR-1B District Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30’ 24.6’ 21.4’ North Side 10’ 60.1’ 60.1’ South Side 10’ 9.5 (detached garage to be removed) 13.2’ Lakeshore 75’ House 44.5’ Deck -38’ No Change Average Lakeshore Much of the northeastern portion of the home is in front of the ALS Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1B District Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140’ Actual 28,679 s.f. (0.66 acre) 227 @ 75’ / 212’ @ OHWL Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 28,679 s.f. (0.66 acre) Allowed: 5,735.8 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,283 s.f. (11.44%) Proposed: 3,544 s.f. (12.36%)* *approximately 1,805 s.f. building footprint is within the 75’ setback and 585 s.f is in front of the ALS Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 17,940 s.f. 7,169.75 s.f. (25 %) 7,174 s.f. (25.01%) 6,794 s.f. * (23.68%) *approximately 2,849 s.f. of hardcover is within the 75-foot setback FILE #LA23-000008 April 17, 2023 Page 3 of 7 Applicable Regulations: Lot Area Variance (Section 78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, such as the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant’s request for variances results in the property’s inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, a lot area variance is required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area variance is not granted. Average Lakeshore & 75-foot Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) Much of the existing home is situated lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and within the 75-foot lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and rebuild on the existing foundation. The proposal includes an expanded footprint for an attached garage within the 75-foot lakeshore setback on the southern end of the property. The proposed 900 square foot attached garage will be located where an existing detached, 745 square foot garage exists today. The applicant is proposing a slight increase in square footage within the 75-foot setback with a total of 1,805 square feet of home to be within the 75-foot lake setback. While the proposal does not include any expanded footprint in front of the average lakeshore setback line, the proposed home will be significantly taller than the existing home, which will add massing within the ALS. The applicant has explained that the taller home is in part due to an increased roof pitch allowing for better insulation and ability to shed snow, which is currently an issue with the existing home. The expanded footprint is depicted on the survey in Exhibit C and the additional massing added can be clearly seen in the volume comparisons found in Exhibit G. The home will stand approximately 7 feet taller than the existing home. The additional footprint within the 75-foot setback is approximately 155 square feet. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1680) The property is approximately 0.66 acres in a one acre minimum zoning district. The existing hardcover on the property is just over the Tier 1 maximum of 25% total hardcover. The proposed development of the property will reduce the overall hardcover and bring the lot into compliance with the hardcover limitation. The proposed total hardcover will be 23.68%. However, City Code Section 78-1680 does not allow hardcover (except for lake stairs, landings, etc.) with the 75-foot lakeshore setback. Much of the existing home and two decks serving the home are located within the 75-foot setback. The applicant is proposing to keep and rebuild on top of the existing foundation and keep the existing decks. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a total of 2,849 square feet of hardcover within the 75-foot lake setback, where none is permitted. Rear Setback Variance (Section 78-330) The existing home is situated on the property 24.6 feet from the rear property line. The required rear yard/street yard setback per the LR-1B District is 30 feet. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and to rebuild on the existing foundation. The applicant is choosing to expand the footprint FILE #LA23-000008 April 17, 2023 Page 4 of 7 by adding a porch. This porch will be in the same plane as the existing home, but due to the angle of the home on the property, the rear yard setback decreases to 21.4 feet. The applicant is proposing a 21.4-foot rear yard setback, where a 30-foot setback is required per code. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variances for the construction of a new single-family home on an existing, nonconforming foundation and substandard parcel are supported by practical difficulties. Much of the existing home is located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, in front of the average lakeshore setback line and closer to the rear property line than the required rear yard setback. The proposal is to build a new home on top of the existing foundation and keep the existing lakeside decks. The lot currently contains a detached garage within the 75-foot lakeshore setback. The applicant is requesting to demolish this structure and construct an attached garage in a similar location. This slightly increases the hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback by 155 square feet. The expanded massing in front of the ALS is largely due to a steeper roof pitch to allow for a better insulated roof that will be able to shed snow effectively. The existing home does not meet the required rear yard setback of 30 feet. The proposal is to rebuild a new home on the existing foundation and to expand the footprint for a front porch. The front porch expansion is in the same plane as the existing wall, however due to the angle of the lot a reduced rear yard setback is requested. The construction of a new home on top of an existing, nonconforming foundation is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties of the substandard lot size, extreme setback requirements, and location of the existing structures. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a new single- family home constructed on a nonconforming foundation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The overall reduction in total hardcover bringing the lot into conformance is also consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new single-family is a reasonable use of the property. The additional hardcover and massing requested is supported by practical FILE #LA23-000008 April 17, 2023 Page 5 of 7 difficulties due to the extreme setback requirements creating a very small building envelope that cannot support the construction of a new home. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing house was not built by the current owners. The lot is substandard in area and has extreme setback limitations due to the location within the inlet of a bay and orientation to the lake. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing foundation to construct a new single-family home. The small lot size, extreme setback requirements, and placement of the existing structures on the lot are not the result of the current property owner’s actions; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a larger home on an existing foundation are supported by practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. The additional massing in front of the average lakeshore setback line will not impact any site lines of the lake that are enjoyed by neighboring properties. The additional hardcover within the 75-foot lakeshore setback is offset by the overall reduction in hardcover on the site, bringing the lot into conformance. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The substandard lot size, unique lot shape, location on the inlet of a bay creating extreme setback requirements and the location of the existing structures on the lot are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the shape of the lot and location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal is to use the existing foundation to construct a new single-family home. The modifications to the FILE #LA23-000008 April 17, 2023 Page 6 of 7 design that increase massing are necessary due to the need for a steeper roof pitch. The overall hardcover will also be reduced on the site. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances allow for the construction of a new home utilizing an existing foundation. The project will decrease the overall hardcover on the site bringing it into conformance. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has provided acknowledgement forms from the neighbors on either side of the subject property. However, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance (s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The proposed project is to demolish the existing home and use the existing foundation to construct a new single-family home. The lot is substandard in area and the existing home is nonconforming as much of it is located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, in front of the average lakeshore setback line and closer to the rear property line than permitted by code. The proposed expansions of footprint do not negatively impact the neighboring area and the proposal will bring the lot into conformance with total hardcover. The lots unique shape, location on the inlet of a bay, substandard size, small building envelope due to extreme setback requirements and the existing placement of structures on the lot all lead to practical difficulties when renovating the existing home. Staff is supportive of the requested variances for lot area, 75-foot lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback, hardcover withi n the 75-foot setback and rear yard setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit C. Survey Exhibit D. Narrative Exhibit E. Plans Exhibit F. Hardcover Information Exhibit G. Volume Comparisons Exhibit H. Neighbor Acknowledgements Exhibit I. Mailing List & Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances to redevelop the property with a new home. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on March 22, 2023 and considered to be complete on March 31, 2023. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on May 30, 2023. Background/ Summary. The subject property is situated on the north side of Coffee channel and is completely within the 75-foot lake setback. The applicant is proposing to construct a new two-story home on the existing footprint location. Because the home and property are nonconforming variances are required. 3. Variance Description. Applicant is requesting the following variances in order to construct a new home; a. Side Yard Setback Variance. A variance to permit a 2.7-foot setback from the side lot line where a 7.5-foot setback is requested; b. 75-foot Lake Setback Variance. Due to the majority of the property being located within the 75-foot setback; a 75-foot lake setback variance is required; c. Average Lakeshore Setback. A 1.4-foot average lakeshore setback is requested; d. Hardcover Variances. Variances for hardcover in the 75-foot setback and total site hardcover to exceed 25% is requested in order to permit 3,032 square feet of hardcover (28.9%) where 2,933 square feet exists and 25% (2,621 square feet) is normally allowed; and e. Lot Width Variance. A lot width variance is required to redevelop the substandard lot. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the variances as applied. The Commission also recommended that the existing mature trees on the property be fenced or protected to the extent possible 5. Public Comment. Comments from the public were received and are attached as Exhibit D. 6. Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt Resolution No. 7363 attached as Exhibit A. Exhibits A. Proposed Resolution No. 7363 B. Proposed Plans C. Draft PC Minutes 04/17/2023 D. Public Comment E. PC Staff Report 04/17/2023 References PC Exhibits 04/17/2023 Item No.: 15 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000019 – AS Designs o/b/o William and Marta Melin, 1940 Shadywood Road, Variances – Resolution No. 7363 Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Existing & Proposed Surveys D. Proposed Plans and Elevations E. Volume Comparison F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations G. Aerial Photos H. Public Comment I. Property Owners List J. Plat Map CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-350; 78-1279; 78-1680 & 78-1700 FILE NO. LA23-000019 WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023, on behalf of William and Marta Melin (hereinafter the “Owners”), A. Sadowski Designs (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 1940 Shadywood Road and legally described as: Lot 34, except the North 45 feet thereof and all of Lot 35 in “Shady-Wood”, according to het plat thereof on file or recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow redevelopment of a nonconforming lot; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new, two-story home 2.7 feet from the side property line where a 7.5-foot setback is required; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a home 1.4 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and entirely lakeward of the 75-foot lake setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700 to allow 3,032 square feet of hardcover within the 75-foot setback and resulting in a total site hardcover of 28.9% where no hardcover is permitted in conjunction with the construction of a new home on the existing foundation; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances conditioned upon the Applicant providing additional fencing/protection for the existing mature trees on the Property; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 2 WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: A1. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above-mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. A3. The Property contains 0.24 acre in area and has a defined lot width of 158 feet at the ordinary high-water level on the western lake frontage. A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. A5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Lot Area Variance b. Side Yard Setback Variance c. Lake Setback Variance d. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance e. Hardcover Variance to exceed 25%; and f. Hardcover Variance for hardcover within the 75-foot setback. A6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 3 ANALYSIS: B1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and width, the unique access over the easement on the rear, the proximity to the channel, the 75- foot lake setback, the existing mature trees along the channel, the existing home location, and the low elevation of the property making development difficult. B2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The variances proposed to rebuild a new home in the same footprint on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. B3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of a new residence on the existing foundation on the substandard lot is reasonable. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The substandard lot size is an existing condition, there is no available land with which to make the Property more conforming. The restricted driveway access, and lot size and location are challenges not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variances for the property which is substandard in area and setback requirements. The project has been designed with an effort toward limiting the additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a new home in the same footprint, which is reasonable. B4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. B5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 4 defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. B6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. B7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. B8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The Property’s substandard size, location, elevation, and unique configuration creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. The proposed setback and hardcover level are not out of character. B9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The Property’s substandard area and width, in addition to the unique configuration along the channel, creates difficulties which apply to very few properties in the City. The neighboring properties have similar challenges. B10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” The proposed size of the home is not exceeding the existing footprint. Granting of the lot area, setback, and hardcover variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the Owners. B11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting the variances for lot area, hardcover, and setback in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. B12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” Without variances the Property is unbuildable. The variances for lot area, setback, and hardcover are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the Owners. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow redevelopment of a CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 5 nonconforming lot; Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new, two-story home 2.7 feet from the side property line where a 7.5-foot setback is required; Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a home 1.4 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and entirely lakeward of the 75-foot lake setback; and Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700 to allow 3,032 square feet of hardcover within the 75-foot setback and resulting in a total site hardcover of 28.9% where no hardcover is permitted in conjunction with the construction of a new home on the existing foundation; subject to the following conditions: C1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. C2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 02/23/2022 and revised on 03/31/2023 by Sathre-Bergquist and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. C3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. C4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (May 8, 2024). C5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. C6. Protective fencing shall be installed around the existing mature trees within the lake yard during construction. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of May, 2023. CITY OF ORONO: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Proposed Conditions 27'-8" 26'-10"121241227'-7"412SCALE:1A3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST3/16"=1'- 0"A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ISSUE DATE: 03.21.23 REVISION DATES: DESIGN DEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS AREFOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY.ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELDVERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD ORONO, MN 55391 A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS 17800 HUTCHINS DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952.303.4230 www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGSCOPYRIGHT 2022A.SADOWSKIDESIGNS, LLCSCALE:2A3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST3/16" = 1'-0"SCALE:3A3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH3/16"=1'- 0" 12:1212:1212:1212:124:12A3.1 ROOF PLAN/ EXTERIOR ELEVATION ISSUE DATE: 03.21.23 REVISION DATES: DESIGN DEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS AREFOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY.ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELDVERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD ORONO, MN 55391 A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS 17800 HUTCHINS DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952.303.4230 www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGSCOPYRIGHT 2022A.SADOWSKIDESIGNS, LLCSCALE:2A3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH3/16"=1'- 0"SCALE:1A3.1ROOF PLAN1/8"=1'- 0" UPTILEWOOD101ENTRYTILEBENCH SEAT WITHSTORAGE SHELVES &HOOKS26682668306830683068COAT CLOSET W/SHELF AND RODBROOM/VACUUM1'-10"VANITYDESKOVEN/MICRO.30" COOKTOPDNDW30" REFBOOKSHELVES/STORAGE5'-0"BOOKCASEWALL15'-6"6'-0"4'-6"30" FRZ4'-6"ABCDFGH 101101A102102MUDROOMTILE103PDR RMTILE104PANTRYWOOD103104C.O.C.O.105KITCHENWOOD106LIVING ROOMWOOD105106GAS FIREPLACEFLUSH HEARTH107STAIRWOODSCALE:1A2.1MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1/4"=1'-0"A2.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN ISSUE DATE: 11.29.22 REVISION DATES: DESIGN DEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS AREFOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY.ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELDVERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD ORONO, MN 55391 A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS 17800 HUTCHINS DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952.303.4230 www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGSCOPYRIGHT 2022A.SADOWSKIDESIGNS, LLC 21068266826683068206820682668206820682668BOOKCASE WALL16'-614"22'-13 8"13'-0"13'-0"2'-0"11'-2916"266826682668IIIJKLMNP203201HALL CARPET203PRIMARY BEDROOMCARPET204CLOSET 1CARPET205PRIMARY BATHTILE206CLOSET 2CARPET207BEDROOM 1CARPET208BEDROOM 2CARPET209BATH 1TILE210LAUNDRYTILE211BONUS ROOMCARPETO201204205205A206207207A208208A208B209209A210211SCALE:1A2.2SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1/4"=1'-0"A2.2 SECOND LEVEL PLAN ISSUE DATE: 11.29.22 REVISION DATES: DESIGN DEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS AREFOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY.ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELDVERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD ORONO, MN 55391 A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS 17800 HUTCHINS DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952.303.4230 www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGSCOPYRIGHT 2022A.SADOWSKIDESIGNS, LLC EXIST/PROPOSEDEXT. STUDYISSUE DATE: 03.21.23REVISION DATES:DESIGNDEVELOPMENTA. SADOWSKI DESIGNS17800 HUTCHINS DRIVEMINNETONKA, MN 55345952.303.4230www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT 2023 A.SADOWSKI DESIGNS, LLC WEST ELEVATION DIAGRAM MELIN RESIDENCE1940 SHADYWOOD ROADORONO, MN 55391SOUTH ELEVATION DIAGRAM NORTH ELEVATION DIAGRAM WEST ELEVATION DIAGRAM 27'-8"26'-10"12 12 4 12 27'-7"4 12 SCALE: 1 A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 3/16"=1'- 0"A3.0EXTERIORELEVATIONISSUE DATE: 03.21.23REVISION DATES:DESIGNDEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE1940 SHADYWOOD ROADORONO, MN 55391A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS17800 HUTCHINS DRIVEMINNETONKA, MN 55345952.303.4230www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT 2022 A.SADOWSKI DESIGNS, LLC SCALE: 2 A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3 A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/16"=1'- 0" 12:12 12:12 12:12 12:12 4:12 A3.1ROOF PLAN/EXTERIORELEVATIONISSUE DATE: 03.21.23REVISION DATES:DESIGNDEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE1940 SHADYWOOD ROADORONO, MN 55391A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS17800 HUTCHINS DRIVEMINNETONKA, MN 55345952.303.4230www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT 2022 A.SADOWSKI DESIGNS, LLC SCALE: 2 A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 3/16"=1'- 0" SCALE: 1 A3.1 ROOF PLAN 1/8"=1'- 0" UPTILE WOOD 101 ENTRY TILEBENCH SEAT WITHSTORAGE SHELVES &HOOKS26682668306830683068COAT CLOSET W/SHELF AND RODBROOM/ VACUUM 1'-10" VANITY DESKOVEN/ MICRO.30" COOKTOPDNDW30" REFBOOKSHELVES/ STORAGE5'-0"BOOKCASE WALL 15'-6" 6'-0"4'-6"30" FRZ4'-6"A B CDFGH 101 101A 102 102 MUDROOM TILE 103 PDR RM TILE 104 PANTRY WOOD 103 104 C.O.C.O. 105 KITCHEN WOOD 106 LIVING ROOM WOOD 105 106 GAS FIREPLACE FLUSH HEARTH 107 STAIR WOOD SCALE: 1 A2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0"A2.1MAIN LEVELPLANISSUE DATE: 11.29.22REVISION DATES:DESIGNDEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE1940 SHADYWOOD ROADORONO, MN 55391A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS17800 HUTCHINS DRIVEMINNETONKA, MN 55345952.303.4230www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT 2022 A.SADOWSKI DESIGNS, LLC 2106826682668306820682 0 6 8 2668206820682668BOOKCASE WALL16'-614"22'-138"13'-0"13'-0" 2'-0" 11'-2916" 2 6 6 8 26682668I I I JKLMN P 203 201 HALL CARPET 203 PRIMARY BEDROOM CARPET 204 CLOSET 1 CARPET 205 PRIMARY BATH TILE 206 CLOSET 2 CARPET 207 BEDROOM 1 CARPET 208 BEDROOM 2 CARPET 209 BATH 1 TILE 210 LAUNDRY TILE 211 BONUS ROOM CARPET O 201 204 205 205A 206 207 207A 208 208A 208B 209 209A 210 211 SCALE: 1 A2.2 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0"A2.2SECONDLEVEL PLANISSUE DATE: 11.29.22REVISION DATES:DESIGNDEVELOPMENTNOTE: LISTED DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR(S).MELIN RESIDENCE1940 SHADYWOOD ROADORONO, MN 55391A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS17800 HUTCHINS DRIVEMINNETONKA, MN 55345952.303.4230www.asadowskidesigns.comALL DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT 2022 A.SADOWSKI DESIGNS, LLC MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 7. LA23-000019 AS DESIGNS, 1940 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE Curtis said the property is along the Coffee Channel and is completely within the 75-foot Lake setback. The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on the existing foundation with a full two-story design including variances for side lot hardcover, 75-foot and average lakeshore setbacks. The applicant has identified the existing home location, the lot’s orientation to the channel, its small size and the mature oak and maple trees near the channel as practical difficulties supporting their requested variances. Curtis said the lot has no buildable envelope for conforming development. The small lot size and the owner’s desire to preserve the mature trees along the channel also create development obstacles. A lot area variance is also required in order to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood. The plan will increase the hardcover from 27.9% to 28.9. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether it is reasonable to permit the further expansion for a second story so close to the property line and whether the second story should be required to be pushed slightly to the south in order to align with the majority of the homes. The applicant is here. Libby said he had received a note from the adjoining property owner concerned about the possible loss of the large trees along the channel. He asked if they had had an arborist look at them. William Moline,1940 Shadywood, Orono, the applicant, said the professional opinion of people who have looked at the construction was that if we move the house any further, that that would impact the root structure and that could have a catastrophic effect on the trees. And that's why we were recommended to build on the existing foundation. He said he would be willing to have a tree professional look at them as well before any construction. McCutcheon said he saw a lot of advantages to the property owner and the neighborhood of protecting the trees, so I appreciate you trying to keep those trees where they are during the construction process. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. McCutcheon noted other homes in that area had been expanded by building vertically. Alethia Sadowski with A Sadowski Designs said when she saw the trees her goal was to design a home that was modest enough to accommodate the owner’s needs and still maintain the existing conditions. She said she thought the trees probably contributed to the stability of the entire channel at that point. She indicated they found out about all the other nonconforming issues along the way. She also said the house is currently not even a full story and a half. Bollis said in his opinion the applicant has demonstrated what we'd like to see in a lot of these applications where you're building on the foundation. It's pretty modest design, and I'm personally for this one. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Kirchner said in looking at the floor plan and design he didn’t have an issue with building up. They’re not trying to put a monstrous house here. The floor plans are very modest. I feel like there is a good-faith effort from the applicant here to truly make this work as closely as possible within the confines there and I feel like they've done a really good job with that. Kraemer said he would agree. Kirchner moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000019, 1940 Shadywood Road, variances as applied. Bollis asked to amend the motion to require silt fencing protection for the large trees during construction. Kirchner and Kraemer accepted the amendment. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. From:Dave Elmquist To:Melanie Curtis Subject:construction of 1940 Shadywood rd Date:Wednesday, April 12, 2023 12:35:27 PM As the owner of 1930 Shadywood road I have no problem with the increased size of the house at 1940 Shadywood rd. My concerns are for damage caused to my property by people and construction equipment trespassing unto my property. with only 3 feet between the building and the property line, I am afraid that there will be an attempt to use equipment to take down and construct the building with heavy equipment on my lawn. My lawn has been damaged in the past with equipment driven on my grass. I have had ruts and crushed grass that to this day have not been restored. A pledge to repair any damage is inadequate so I require that a notresspassing requirement be initiated before a permit is issued. The renters on this property have stored stuff alongside their Garage onto my property and they have stored their Dock on my property, killing my grass. They have installed their Dock to the property line so as to have boats tied up in front of my property. I request that the Orono Police be informed of this no trespass requirement so they will be ready to enforce it when required. Thank you Melanie for keeping the nabors informed on this matter. I will not be attending the meeting as I am out of the State at this time. Thank you David Elmquist From:David Burda To:Melanie Curtis Subject:Re: LA23-000019 / 1940 Shadywood Rd - Staff report Date:Friday, April 14, 2023 1:46:39 PM Attachments:image.png image.png Hi Melanie - Thank you so much for sending over the information on LA23-000019. I have one comment and one question: Comment: There are two massive cottonwood trees (probably over 100' tall each) within 10' or so of the existing home's foundation. I understand the homeowners are attempting to keep these trees. I would like a commitment that if either of these trees are damaged in any way during construction that the homeowners be required to remove the trees before they become a safety hazard to my home as well as to anyone using the channel (see image below) Question: Can you confirm that the south exterior elevation is correct. There appears to be a window missing from the side of the garage to the left of the main entrance (see image below). Thank you Melanie. David Burda 1966 Shadywood Road On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:32 AM Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Please reach out with any questions. The meeting is Monday at 6PM. Date Application Received: 03/22/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/31/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/30/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 17 April 2023 Subject: #LA23-000019, AS Designs o/b/o William Melin, 1940 Shadywood Road, Variances Public Hearing Background The subject property is situated on the Coffee channel and is completely within the 75-foot lake setback. Applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on the existing foundation with a full two-story design. The new home is proposed to be 2.7 feet from the side lot line where a 7.5-foot setback* is required; fully within the 75-foot lake setback; 1.4 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and will have a full second story where currently there is a second story over the middle portion of the home. Variances for side, average lakeshore, and 75-foot setbacks as well as lot width and hardcover in the 75-foot setback where no hardcover is permitted and hardcover to exceed the 25% maximum for the entire site are also requested for this project. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the existing home location, the lot’s orientation to the channel, its narrow width, and the mature oak and maple trees near the channel as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following variances in conjunction with redevelopment of the property with a new single-family home: 1. Lot area; 2. Side yard setback; 3. 75-foot lake setback; 4. Average lakeshore setback; and 5. 75-foot hardcover (building and structure). 6. Hardcover exceeding 25% for the overall site. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends partial approval. FILE # LA23-000019 17 April 2023 Page 2 of 5 Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that there are several challenging issues on this site. The lot’s narrowness and location along the channel result in no building envelope for conforming development. The small lot size and the owners’ desire to preserve the mature oaks along the channel also create development obstacles. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 & 78-1279 – Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Street/Rear 30’ 39.1’ 39.1’ North Side *7.5’ 2.7’ 2.7’ Channel Side/Lakeshore 75’ 33.2’ 33.2’ Lakeshore 75’ 43.3’ 43.3’ Average Lakeshore The ALS set by the home to the north is 44.5- feet. The existing and proposed home encroaches approximately 1.4 feet lakeward of the ALS. Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ Actual 10,485 s.f. (0.24 acre) 158’ at the OHWL *This lot functions as a “corner” lakeshore lot and for the purposes of width measurement. The frontage on the lake proper (the east shoreline) is 53 feet wide at the OHWL and 70 feet at the 75 foot setback. Technically, the width could be measured as 158 feet wide from point-to-point at the OHWL. However, staff has applied the side setback flexibility to this lot allowing for a 7.5-foot side setback (10% of the lot’s width but not less than 7.5 feet). Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 10,485 s.f. (0.24 acre) Allowed: 2,097 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,686 s.f. (16%) Proposed: 1,686 s.f. (16%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 10,485 s.f. 2,621 s.f. (25 %) 2,933 s.f. (27.9%) 3,032 s.f. (28.9%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Width Variance (Section 78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland FILE # LA23-000019 17 April 2023 Page 3 of 5 Overlay District, such as the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant’s request for variances results in the property’s inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are also required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area variance is not granted. 75-foot Lake Setback; Average Lakeshore Setback; Side Yard Setback Variances (Sections 78-350 and 78- 1279) There is a small, 330 square foot triangle in the northwest corner of the property located outside the 75- foot lake setback, yet is not buildable as it is within the side and rear yards. The applicant is proposing to build a new home on the existing foundation as they find this to be the most suitable location to build due to the site constraints. The site constraints include the channel setback of 75 feet, the 75-foot lake setback on the east, the existing mature trees along the channel, the narrow width, the existing home location, and the low elevation of the property (impacted by floodplain regulations). To solve this space limitation the applicant is proposing to increase the square footage of the 2nd story over the entire footprint. The existing home has a partial 2nd story in the middle portion of the building. According to the comparison plans, the applicant is proposing to increase the height of the home by approximately 7.5 feet overall. Volume comparisons can be seen in Exhibit E. 75-foot Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1279; 78-1680; and 78-1700) The applicant is proposing a new 99 square foot sidewalk as part of this plan, increasing the hardcover from 27.9% to 28.9%. All of the hardcover with the exception of a 90 square foot portion of driveway is within the 75-foot setback. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. FILE # LA23-000019 17 April 2023 Page 4 of 5 According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and width, the unique access over the easement on the rear, the proximity to the channel, the 75-foot lake setback, the existing mature trees along the channel, the existing home location, and the low elevation of the property making development difficult. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances proposed to rebuild a new home in the same footprint on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of a new residence on the existing foundation on the substandard lot is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size is an existing condition, there is no available land with which to make the property more conforming. The restricted driveway access, and lot size and location are challenges not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variances for the property which is substandard in area and setback requirements. The project has been designed with an effort toward limiting the additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a new home in the same footprint, which is reasonable. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size, location, elevation, and unique configuration creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. The proposed setback and hardcover level are not out of character. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s substandard area and width, in addition to the unique configuration along the channel, creates difficulties which apply to very few properties in the City. The neighboring properties have similar challenges. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed size of the home is not exceeding the existing footprint. Granting of the lot area, setback, and hardcover variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variances for lot area, hardcover, and setback in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. FILE # LA23-000019 17 April 2023 Page 5 of 5 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Without variances the property is unbuildable. The variances for lot area, setback, and hardcover are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit H. The comments are generally supportive yet the neighbor is requesting that his property not be adversely impacted by construction or outdoor storage on the north side of the home. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances to construct a new home on the existing foundation. The applicant has indicated that the proposed home will have a full basement. The plans submitted for building permit should identify the basement floor elevation and any openings to verify conformance with FEMA’s 100-year floodplain low floor minimum elevation requirement of 932.5’. The planning commission should discuss the setback for the portion of the home within 2.7 feet from the property line. Is it reasonable to permit the further expansion of the volume for a second story so close to the property line? Is it reasonable to require the second story to be pushed to the south in order to align with the portions of the home set 5.5 feet from the property line? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Surveys Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Volume Comparison Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Public Comment Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: Approved By: 1. Purpose. To consider the preliminary plat for 3017 North Shore Drive. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was deemed complete on March 31, 2023. The 120-Day review period will expire on July 29, 2023. 3. Background. The property owner proposes to subdivide the property into two buildable lots, each meeting the minimum lot area, size, and frontage requirements. The existing house is proposed to remain but a portion of the western attached garage will be removed to meet the new setback requirements. The properties will have a shared driveway using the existing access. A portion of the garage, patio and other improvements identified in the preliminary plat drawing associated with the existing home is proposed to be removed to meet all required setbacks. Section 78- 330- Lot Area/ Width: Required Area (Acres) Proposed Area (Acres) Width Requirement Width at the OHWL (Feet) Width at the 75’ lakeyard setback (Feet) Lot 1 (existing home) 1.0 2.56 140’ ±690’ ±530’ Lot 2 1.0 1.01 140’ 140’ 140’ The Planning Commission memo provides Staff’s analysis of the proposed subdivision; attached as Exhibit D. Hennepin County has reviewed the application and is not requesting any changes for the proposed application. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission reviewed the project at their meeting on April 17th. The Commission discussed the lot shapes, building envelope for the newly created lot, the shared driveway access, and 10’ trail easement. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat. 5. Public Comment. Comments from the public are included in the minutes attached as Exhibit C. Comments included verification of side yard setbacks and questions about future house plans. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council adopt the resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Preliminary Plat C. Applicant’s Narrative Item No.: 16 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000015 – Swanson Homes, 3017 North Shore Drive, Preliminary Plat – Resolution No 7365 Presenter: Laura Oakden Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda D. Hennepin County Letter E. Proposed House Concept F. PC Draft Minutes dated April 17, 2013 G. PC Staff report References Planning Commission Packet 4/17/23 A. Application B. Preliminary Plat C. Narrative D. Proposed Hardcover Calculations E. MCWD District Comments F. 2040 Parks Map G. Mailing information Page 1 of 6 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE FILE NO. LA23-000015 WHEREAS, Blake Swanson with Swanson Homes, (hereinafter the “Developer”) has requested approval of a subdivision of the property addressed 3017 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") also identified as PID 09-117-23-32-0002 and legally described as follows: Lots 5 through 10 inclusive, Coronado Beach, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on March 31, 2023, the Developer filed a complete application with the City for preliminary approval of a 2-lot residential plat of the Property; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, on April 17, 2023, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023 the Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended by a vote of 6 to 0 that the City Council grant preliminary plat approval, subject to a number of specified conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposal at a regular meeting held on May 8, 2023, and hereby makes the following findings with regards to this application: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File LA23-000015. 2.The Property is guided in the 2040 Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) for single family residential use at a density of 0.5-2 units per acre. The proposed development with single family homes is consistent with the provisions of the CMP, and is consistent with surrounding development. The Property is located within the MUSA CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7365 Page 2 of 6 and will be served with city sewer and private water. 3. The Property is zoned LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential District, which requires a minimum lot area of 1 acre and minimum lot width of 140'. The Property contains a total area of approximately 155,509 s.f. or 3.57 acres and has a width of approximately 830 feet at the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) and approximately 670 feet at the 75 foot lakeshore setback. 4. The proposed plat would create one new buildable lot. Lot 1 is 2.56 acres in area and 690 feet at the OHWL. Lot 2 is 1 acre in area and a width of 140 feet at the OHWL and lakeshore setback. The proposed lots meet the LR-1B zoning district requirements. 5. Access to both new lots will be via a single shared driveway entrance from North Shore Drive. 6. The Property lies within 1,000’ of Lake Minnetonka requiring conformance with the hardcover regulations of the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The entire Property is within Hardcover Tier 1 allowing 25% impervious surface. 7. Lot 1 is developed and will have a conforming hardcover level of 19.2%. 8. A trail easement, concurrent with the required 10-foot perimeter drainage and utility easement in favor of the City is proposed on the street side of Lot 1 and Lot 2 along North Shore Drive. Because dedication of actual land for park purposes is not required at this location, a Park Dedication Fee in lieu of land per City Ordinance would be appropriate. 9. Both proposed lots will contain suitable area meeting all established setback, hardcover and lot coverage requirements to allow the construction of single-family residences without the need for variances. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby grants Preliminary Plat Approval for a 2-lot subdivision per the Preliminary Plat survey/drawing by Mark S. Gronberg of Gronberg & Associates, Inc. dated March 28, 2023 and attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 6 1) Lot Standards. Any proposed improvements must meet all setbacks requirements of the Zoning Code. 2) Driveway Access. Driveway access to Lots 1 and 2 shall be a shared driveway within Lot 1. All other curb cuts or access points onto the adjacent County Road shall be removed. The Developer shall establish the appropriate shared driveway easements and maintenance covenants over the shared driveway area identified on Exhibit A. 3) Trail Easement. An easement for public trail purposes concurrent with required 10-foot perimeter drainage and utility easement shall be granted by the Developer over the northwesterly 10 feet of the plat parallel with North Shore Drive. 4) Municipal Sewer and Private Well. The Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). City sewer service is available to the properties. Both Lots 1 and 2 shall make individual connections to the existing sewer main in North Shore Drive. The properties will be served by individual private water supply wells. 5) City Utility Connection Charges. The Property was fully assessed for sanitary sewer as a single parcel for one unit. . A second sewer connection charge will be due for Lot 2 prior to Final Plat approval in the amount of $5800.00 (2023 Fee Schedule). 6) Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge (SAC). Met Council SAC charges for the newly created lot will be due at the time of building permit for Lot 2. 7) Stormwater and Drainage Improvements. Final plat approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permits as required. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. Upon building permit issuance, the property owner will be required to comply with individual lot stormwater and erosion control management practices. 8) Drainage and Utility Easements. On the final plat, Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated to the public 10' along all exterior property lines, and 5' either side of interior property lines, except such easements shall be increased to accommodate drainage where required, subject to City staff approval. If applicable, Drainage Easements shall be granted over any stormwater facilities required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; the Drainage Easements shall be shown on the Plat. Page 4 of 6 9) Removals. A demolition permit must be issued and final for the encroaching improvement on the existing parcel prior to submittal of final plat application. This includes a portion of the garage, patio, utility and landscaping improvements, identified within Exhibit A 10) Development Fees. A. Park Dedication Fee. The subdivision is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement. The Park Dedication Fee is outlined in the City’s current 2023 Fee Schedule and applied to each newly created lot on a per lot basis. Park dedication fees are based on Hennepin County’s assessment of the predeveloped land value. Based on the 2023 Fee Schedule, the Park Dedication Fee will be due for Lot 2 in the amount of $136,302.52. B. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee. The development is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, as established in the 2023 Fee Schedule of $5,250 per new lot for the 1-acre zone. The Storm Water Drainage and Trunk Fee due at the time of Final Plat for 1 new lot will be $5,250.00. C. Utility connection fees as described above. Sewer connection charge will be due for Lot 2 prior to Final Plat approval in the amount of $5800.00 11) City Engineer Approval. Approval of the plat is subject to recommendations of City Engineer Adam Edwards. 12) Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions prior to final plat approval, to ensure that the proposed plat will accomplish the intended purposes: (a) Final conceptual grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the proposed shared driveway, showing existing and proposed contours; any proposed stormwater facilities and calculations as required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; proposed utility connections; and erosion control measures to be used during demolition and construction. Final Plat Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater management plans. (b) Final plans and specifications for all proposed utility lines and services, including proposed revisions, if any, to existing service facilities. (b) Sufficient detail to meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. Page 5 of 6 13) The Preliminary Plat approval granted by this Resolution shall expire one-year from the approval date (May 8, 2024). FINAL SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Coordinator at least four (4) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of (1) to-scale digital copy; two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County); and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Gronberg & Associates, Inc., dated March 28, 2023 attached hereto as Exhibit A, except as modified herein. B. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property line, with exceptions and additions as noted herein. C. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements over all stormwater facilities. D. Dedication of Drainage Easements over areas shown as wetlands. E. Dedication of Drainage Easements over all drainageways. F. Naming of plat. 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. Page 6 of 6 B. Private Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement. C. Trail Easement. D. The Developer must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 3. Plat approval fees to be paid: Total due: $150,402.52 A. Final plat fee: $550.00 B. Park Dedication Fee: $136,302.52 C. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $5250.00 D. Sewer Connection Charge: $5,800.00 E. Final Plat Escrow: $2,500.00 4. This Approval shall be effective until May 8, 2024 per the provisions of Zoning Code Section 82-116. If Final Plat Approval is not granted by that date, the terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole discretion may extend this effective period. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of May, 2023 ATTEST: _________________________________ __________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor BRIDGE 23051REVISED.SCJ 23-051 LAKE ---------------- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CURT SW ANSON HOMES, LLC OF LOTS 5-10, CORONADO BEACH LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA MINNETONKA 0 30 11 I I 11 11 I I I 1 I • 120 I S C A L E I N F E E T LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : (Per Certificate of Title No. 1553825) Lots 5 through 10 incl\_Jsive, Coronado Beach, Lake Minnetonka. CRYSTAL BAY Note: According to county maps, the alley between Lots 6 and 10 and between 7 and 10 has been vacated. However, the vacation has not been added to the above Certificate of Title. A proceeding subsequent may be needed to add the vacated alley to the Certificate. 0 • (908.3) -917--'. denotes iron marker set denotes iron marker found denotes existing spot elevdtion, mean sea level datum denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, partially proposed to be removed, spot elevations, topography, and all visible "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed dividing line thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. w m5 w � :g n N .u [/J z co 1--1 z L[) z n< L[) U)L[) µ:::J E-i <r: 1--1 u 0 U) U) <r: o'8 CJ � µ:::J p:i z � CJ 0 zz 2< ...:l w"' tzi <( P:l 0 (.'.) st >< z � st"'1 0 I :> _J P:l n ::, w ..... > O::'. I Q 0 N L[) z s: < 0 _J tzi _J P:l s: "'1 :r: "'1 f-z O::'. .... 0 z "'1 L[) st a, �-� I wO olO �I{) ..Jt") zo gC'\lhlll I f-- u w 7 0 Ct'. 0.... z 0 z 0 0 w N I I-n.. I 0 I :: ,n� � N � n n N N I � � N I .), n ,r) ,r) ..... N L Q) -" E :,z Q) (ll C ....J 0�0 (ll (I) C C -"' L 0 2 1 Laura Oakden From:Blake Swanson <Blake@swansonhomes.com> Sent:Friday, March 31, 2023 4:15 PM To:Laura Oakden Cc:Melanie Curtis Subject:RE: LA23-000015, 3017 North Shore Dr- Preliminary Plat- Incomplete Attachments:Curt Swanson 3017 N. Shore HC 3-28-23.pdf; Curt Swanson Homes 3-28-23.pdf Importance:High Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Laura,  Attached/below you will find the remaining items to complete our submission.   Please see my comments in red below. Here is the narrative that I’d like to submit for this application:  3017 North Shore Drive is one of the most distinctive properties on the northern shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. Featuring  panoramic views and flat shoreline, this property has undergone a history of change over the last decade, and it is our  intent to the use the process of subdivision as an opportunity to revitalize and enhance this stretch of shoreline both for  the immediate vicinity, and for the surrounding community. Our primary goal for this request is to thoughtfully modify  the current structure so that it’s better suited to accompany the eastern portion of the property, while creating an  additional conforming homesite on the western side, with a natural home placement position. By arranging the property  in this way, there are two favorable outcomes:  1.The existing home and its new property boundaries on the Eastern side will become more conducive to the overall aesthetic of this stretch of shoreline. By doing this, we will be able to bring new life and a new perspective on a property that has otherwise been mostly vacant for the past two years. 2.The new property to the West features a home site that naturally sits between the existing structures. The new home will be designed in a manner that compliments the shores upon which it will rest, all while avoiding any impacts to the natural features around it. Based on what is being proposed, all current natural features of the property that would be imperative to protect are already encompassed within current prevention zones (namely the 75 ft. lakeshore setback). In addition, there are currently no trees within the building area of the new home that would need to be removed. Per the attached survey with the proposed subdivision, the current single driveway access to County Rd 51 will be  maintained, with the new property gaining driveway access only upon exiting County Rd 51 onto the new driveway. By  designing the access in this way, there will be no further access points being requested to County Rd 51.  To maintain the aesthetic integrity of the area, and to conform with current zoning ordinances, the western garage and  rear porch that are currently affixed to the existing home will be demolished. At the direction of the individual that  provided the creative design for this home when it was originally crafted, this garage space will be remodeled to conform  to the new property line and to better situate the existing home on the easter portion of the property. The rear porch will  be removed, providing a better termination point to this side of the home, especially as it relates to the orientation of the  new proposed home/lot to the West.  At present, there is a well providing a water supply to the existing structure. As part of this subdivision, a new well will be  installed for the existing home, and the current well will likely be preserved to serve the new to be built home.   2 The northern stretch of shoreline on Crystal Bay is one of the most prominent on Lake Minnetonka. We’ve carefully  designed this proposed subdivision plan with the future in mind and to enrich the appeal of the properties in this area.  Please let me know if there is anything further needed at this point. Otherwise, I look forward to getting next steps from  you in preparation for the planning commission review on April 17th.  Best,   Blake Swanson  VP – Swanson Homes  612.710.8353  Blake@swansonhomes.com  1.Preliminary Plat Survey: a.Existing 1‐foot elevation contours must be shown on the survey. Added to survey b.The existing patio abuts the newly proposed property boundary.  A 10’ setback is required from the proposed property line.  The patio must be removed to meet this setback requirement or a variance request must be made.  Please note, Staff will not support a side yard setback variance for the patio. Patio to be removed is now shown on survey. c.There is fencing along the existing perimeter property boundaries. Show any existing fencing including the fence height, including any proposed changes to the fencing. 2.MCWD Communication:  Include any communication with the MCWD and copies of any MCWD permits for the project, or notice from the MCWD that no permits are required. I forwarded  you an email from MCWD on Tuesday, March 28th, with confirmation that this will not be needed. 3.Conservation Design.  Submittal of a conservation design analysis and plan is a requirement for all subdivisions created in the urban area.  This parcel requires submittal of a conservation design plan. Please review the above link to address the conservation design criteria requirements.  You may request to waive this requirement.  You can request a waiver of this requirement by submitting a written request for this variance/waiver (email is sufficient). Staff may support the waiver because the parcel has been developed in the past and does not appear to have high quality woodlands or other natural features fitting the criteria for preservation. There are regulations in place which currently preserve the existing trees within the 75‐foot setback, floodplain, and wetland areas. We would request to have this requiremend waived, as we feel it is not applicable to this application. We are not doing any grading or earthwork, nor are there any impactful natural features within the confines of this property that are not otherwise currently in established protection zones (namely the 75 ft. lakeshore setback). Also we will not be removing any trees as part of this request. 4.Narrative: Briefly describe the project and your intent for the parcel.   Please address your plans for the existing water supply well which is located on proposed Lot 2 serving the existing home and detail the demo of portions of the existing house. Also note you plan to remove any existing trees. See above. 1 Laura Oakden From:Blake Swanson <Blake@swansonhomes.com> Sent:Friday, March 24, 2023 3:44 PM To:Laura Oakden Subject:Re: LA23-000015, 3017 North Shore Dr- Preliminary Plat- Incomplete Hi Laura,  Thanks for sending this comprehensive outline. I will be sure we address all the enumerated items before next Friday‘s  deadline, and also have a mindful eye on the items required for final plat.  Can this email serve as our formal request to waive item #3? This property was recently developed, and it does not  appear that there are any noteworthy natural areas that have not otherwise been identified prior to the recent  development.  Thanks,  Blake Swanson  VP ‐ Swanson Homes  Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us April 24, 2023 Laura Oakden, Community Development Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: Preliminary Plat Review – 3017 North Shore Drive (Received April 6, 2023) County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 51 (North Shore Drive) Hennepin County Plat Review ID #4038 (Reviewed April 10, 2023) Ms. Oakden: Please consider the following county staff comments for this plat proposal to split the parcel at 3017 North Shore Drive into two single family home lots. Access: Hennepin County supports the proposal to share the existing driveway and would not permit a second driveway to serve the new parcel. Right-of-Way: The county does not anticipate any additional right of way needs at this location. Storm Water / Drainage: Please ensure discharge rates remain less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Additional treatments may be needed if flow rates cannot match existing. Contact: Eric Vogel at 612-596-0316 or eric.vogel2@hennepin.us Permits: Please inform the developer that all construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact: Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator at 612-596-0336 or michael.olmstead@hennepin.us More Information: Please contact KC Atkins: 612-596-0354, kc.atkins@hennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, Carla Stueve, PE County Highway Engineer ORONO, MNApril 28, 2023 PROPOSED PROPERTY SPLIT | NORTH SHORE DRIVE © DCD 202301A MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4. LA23-000015 SWANSON HOMES, 3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT Oakden reported the applicant is requesting a preliminary plat approval to subdivide 3.57 acres into two buildable lots. There's currently one house and the applicant is proposing to demo a portion of the existing house in order to meet the side-yard setback required by a new shared property line between lot one and lot two. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the LR1B1 family lakeshore residential zoning districts. Both lots will meet the one-acre size and 140-foot width requirement in that zoning district. Staff feels the proposed lots are consistent with the character of the neighborhood and do not trigger the requirements for conservation design. All drainage and utility easements will meet current City standards and have been preliminarily reviewed by the City engineer. Minnehaha Creek provided a comment that a two-lot subdivision does not trigger their permitting requirements but they may require permitting at time of demo and of construction. Hennepin County has not submitted comments yet but did provide an update that they have no major concerns. The applicant is proposing a shared driveway access off of North Shore. A driveway easement and maintenance agreement should be required with this plat. Staff recommends a 10-foot easement be obtained along North Shore Drive to support the creation of a potential regional trail corridor. Staff recommends approval of the subdivision with additional requirements before final plat, including a driveway easement and maintenance agreement, 10-foot trail easement along North Shore Drive and separate sewer connections and demo permits. The applicant is here and can speak to the project. McCutcheon noted the lot is irregular and asked if there had been an attempt to make the lot lines square up with the lake. Blake Swanson, Swanson homes,1360 Hamel Road, Medina, said they had put a lot of time and effort into the design especially given the existing home. The reason the lot line goes around the home the way that it does is because that's right where the kitchen and the mudroom are. Going straight line through there and also meeting the other requirements would be a substantial slice through a very critical part of the home. We've been working very diligently with staff to try and come up with a plan that meets all of the requirements of the ordinance. It's consistent with a lot of the other properties along this stretch. He said the new lot to be created would be about 100 feet wide which is also consistent with others in the area. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. Kathryn Kallas, 3048 North Shore Drive, the homeowner across the street, also asked about the irregular shape of the lot and said it would be helpful to the neighbors to be able to see what's being proposed and how it is going to be situated. She said there is no one currently living in this home and it was not intended to be a living home for someone per the neighborhood discussion, it was seen as a flip that would take place in the neighborhood. Those of us who live in the neighborhood enjoy this space, enjoy the size of the homes and the properties and how it's been configured over the years. Draft MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Jeff Zitzloff, 1380 Briar Street, said he does not live in the neighborhood but questioned if the lot line between the existing home and the new lot would create a reasonable setback. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. Oakden said that zoning district requires a 10-foot setback, as proposed with portions of the existing house and patio slated to be removed, the existing home would be a conforming structure relating to setbacks and hardcover. McCutcheon stated his biggest concern was the shape of the lot but he supports the shared driveway for safety reasons. He said if you look at the proposed plat it doesn’t make sense but if you look at the zoom out of the houses are pretty close together. Kirchner commented about the building envelope which appears to be adequate. He discussed the struggle to consider denying something like this when someone is asking to develop land in a conforming manner to our existing ordinances. He said it would not be the smallest lot in the area and would be in the middle of lot sizes in the neighborhood. Kraemer stated he finds it a thoughtful subdivision. He likes the fact that they are doing the common driveway for safety and aesthetics. He thinks it fits the character of the neighborhood. It's definitely not a straight property line but there's a lot of crooked property lines in Orono and you can see why this one's required. Libby said he would support the staff recommendation of requiring a maintenance agreement for the shared driveway. He notes that would eliminate a lot of potential problems. The 2040 plan guides this for one acre so we're beyond that on the on the first site and I would tend to be in favor of this. Bollis noted there are other shared driveways in the area which makes sense on a county road. He added it meets all the checkmarks for what the code requires in a subdivision. Kirchner moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000015, 3017 North Shore Drive, preliminary plat with the stipulation that a driveway and driveway maintenance easement be included, a trail easement, drainage and utility easement and additional sewer connection as noted by City staff in their recommendation as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Draft Date Application Received: March 21, 2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: March 31, 2023 120-Day Review Period Expires: July 29, 2023 To: Chris Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: April 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000015, Swanson Homes, 3017 North Shore Drive, Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing to subdivide 3017 North Shore Drive into two buildable lots. There is currently one house on the property. The applicant is proposing to demolish a portion of the existing house in order to meet the 10-foot required side yard setback established by the new shared property boundary. The applicant also indicated they will remove any existing encroachments including the existing well, the generator and patio associated with the existing home. The project area is 3.57 acres. There is no wetland identified on the site however, there is floodplain. Access will be provided by a shared driveway. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78- 420- Lot Area/ Width: Required Area (Acres) Proposed Area (Acres) Width Requirement Width at the OHWL (Feet) Width at the 75’ lakeyard setback (Feet) Lot 1 (existing home) 1.0 2.56 140’ ±690’ ±530’ Lot 2 1.0 1.01 140’ 140’ 140’ Section 78-1403- Structural Building Coverage: Both lots are proposed to meet the 1.0 acre minimum size requirement. No home is proposed yet for lot 2, however it will be required to meet 20% structure coverage. As proposed, Lot 1 is proposed to have 8% structural coverage with the existing improvement. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 - Hardcover Calculations: Both lots are within Tier 1 of the Stormwater Overlay District with a 25% maximum hardcover limit. Lot 1 is proposed to be at 19.2 % hardcover meeting the requirement. There is no home proposed yet for Lot 2; it will be required to meet the 25% hardcover maximum. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide 3.57 acres into two buildable lots. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE #LA23-000015 April 17, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Analysis Conformity with 2040 Orono Community Management Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Urban Estate Density Residential, 0.5 to 2 units per acre. The proposal involves creation of 2 lots at 0.56 units per acre. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Conformity with LR-1B Zoning District Standards. The property is currently zoned LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential (1.0 acre). Lot 1 is proposed to be 2.56 acres and Lot 2 is proposed to be 1.01 acres, both lots will meet the zoning district standard. There are no identified wetlands or bluffs on the property. The property is within the MUSA and properties are served by sewer. Relationship to Surrounding Development. The proposed lots are consistent in character with the neighboring lots. North Shore Drive is a County road that serves as access to the neighborhood. Most of the neighboring lots are around 1 acre in size. The smallest property is directly to the west at 0.61 acres and the largest is across North Shore Drive to the north at 2.86 acres. Conservation Design: The requirements of this conservation design ordinance are meant to preserve and enhance this ecological/aesthetic character are the area. This is often triggered for properties over 5 acres in size or with increased density. The proposed project does not trigger the requirements for a conservation design. Utilities: The properties are served by City sewer and private water supply wells. The City Engineer noted a separate sewer connection will be required for the new lot. The existing home has a well currently located on the proposed lot 2. This will need to be disconnected and removed from the lot. Each property must have their own water supply well located within each property boundary. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: The MCWD provided comment that a 2 lot subdivision does not trigger their permitting. Erosion control permits may be required for demo of the existing home and construction of a new home on Lot 2. Hennepin County: No comments have been received from Hennepin County at this time. Drainage and Utility Easements: The City requires standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in the Plat and drainage easements over the wetland areas. The easements as shown on the proposed plat drawing must be revised to meet the City standards. Driveway Easement: The applicant is proposing a shared driveway for access from North Shore Drive. A driveway easement and maintenance agreement will be required. Parks/ Trails Trail easement: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan outlines the goal of incorporating connectivity and strengthening greenways and trails. Trail corridors/ easements will be incorporated at the edge of subdivisions and adjacent to major roadways. The 2040 Parks map indicates an existing on-street trail along North Shore Drive abutting this project. There is a 2040 regional trail system corridor identified by the County and this corridor area is identified as abutting this property. Staff recommends an easement should be obtained to FILE #LA23-000015 April 17, 2023 Page 3 of 3 support the creation of the regional trail corridor. Parks: The Parks, Open Space and Trail Plan chapter of the Orono Comprehensive Plan does not specify the need for a neighborhood park at this location. The site is near Noerenberg Memorial Gardens which is a regional park. As there is no defined need for park land at this location, it would appear that dedication of actual land for park purposes is not required. Absent the need for park land dedication, a Park Dedication Fee in lieu of land would be appropriate per City Ordinance. Park Dedication: The proposed application is anticipated to pay a park dedication fee in lieu of providing land for the newly created lot. The fee is determined by fair market value of the land being subdivided. The assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land for establishing the amount of the fee. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission have comment on the trail easement? 2. Does the Planning Commission have comment on the driveway easement? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the subdivision with the following additional requirements for final plat: - A Driveway Easement and maintained agreement - Trail easement List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Preliminary Plat Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Proposed Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. MCWD District Comments Exhibit F. 2040 Parks Map Exhibit G. Mailing information AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: NAN Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: 1. Purpose. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested for a class II restaurant within an existing multi-tenant building. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on March 22, 2023 and considered to be complete on March 31, 2023. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on May 30, 2023. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant, Caroline Cano-Garnica, is proposing to open a restaurant at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, a multi-tenant building with a variety of uses. The applicant is proposing to remodel two vacant units totaling approximately 1,700 square feet for the new restaurant. No exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The interior renovation will require a building permit and any proposed signage will require compliance with the Orono Sign Code and obtaining a sign permit. The applicant has indicated the shared parking lot that serves the multi-tenant building has enough parking for the proposed use. As applied the applicant has indicated 6 parking spots that are not currently striped for use of the restaurant. The proposed restaurant will serve liquor thus classifying it as a class II restaurant per the City Code, a liquor license will be required. A conditional use permit is required for class II restaurants in the B-1 District. Additionally, staff has completed a site plan review for the new proposed business the analysis is attached as Exhibit C. All requirements are met. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. No public comments were made. The commission discussed the proposed restaurant and were supportive of the use. The commission discussed the parking and garbage requirements noting that if complaints or issues develop additional striping and potentially a garbage encloser may be required in the future. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variance as applied. 5. Public Comment. No public comments were received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the class II restaurant at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard W with the following conditions: 1. Striping the 6 identified parking spots to support the new restaurant use. 2. If parking or garbage become a nuisance or unsightly the council may consider reviewing the conditional use permit to consider additional striping or the construction of a garbage enclosure. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution No. 7366 Exhibits A. Draft Resolution No. 7366 B. Proposed Plans C. Site Plan Review Memo D. Draft PC Minutes 04/17/2023 Item No.: 17 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000016 – Carolina Cano-Garnica, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, Conditional Use Permit – Resolution No. 7366 Presenter: Natalie Nye Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: NAN Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: E. PC Staff Report 04/17/2023 References PC Exhibits 04/17/2023 A. Application B. Narrative C. Floorplan D. Parking Plan E. Property Owner Approval F. Mailing List & Map CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7366 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 78-644 FILE NO. LA23-000016 WHEREAS, on March 22, 2023, Carolina Cano-Garnica, (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for a conditional use permit for the property addressed 2160 Wayzata Blvd. W. and legally described as: The West 200 feet of that part of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as commencing at the Northwest corner of said East half of the Northwest Quarter; thence due South (assumed bearing) along the West line of said East Half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1311.29 feet; thence South 87 degrees 41 minutes East, 545.78 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 87 degrees 41 minutes West, 200 feet; thence North 2 degrees 19 minutes East, 188.93 feet; thence North 87 degrees 41 minutes West, 200 feet; thence South 2 degrees 19 minutes West, 334.96 feet to the Northerly right of way line of State Highway No 12; thence South 69 degrees 41 minutes East along said Northerly right of way line 45.94 feet; thence Easterly 364.3 feet along said Northerly right of way line being a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 1587.28 feet to an intersection with a line bearing South 2 degrees 19 minute West from the actual point of beginning; thence North 2 degrees 19 minutes East 232.24 feet to actual point of beginning. The boundary lines thereof are marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17100. Subject to a snow fence easement in favor of the State of Minnesota on land adjacent to the highway as shown by instrument recorded in Book 1129 of Deeds, page 144, Doc. No. 1428611; Subject to an easement for highway purposes in favor of State of Minnesota over the following described tract: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said East half of the Northwest Quarter run due South (oriented to assume bearing) along the West line of said East Half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1275.90 feet; thence South 52 degrees 30 minutes East, 180.11 feet; thence South 2 degrees 19 minutes West, 38.99 feet to the center of former State Aid Road No. 9 being the point of beginning; thence continue South 2 degrees 19 minutes West 38.62 feet; thence South 69 degrees 41 minutes East, 45.94 feet; thence on a tangential curve, concave to the North having a radius of 1587.28 feet (central angle 3 degrees 16 minutes 20 seconds) 90.65 feet; thence North 56 degrees 44 minutes West 152.35 feet to the point of beginning; WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-644 in order to open and operate a class II restaurant; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7366 2 WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested conditional use permit as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA23-000016. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above-mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the B-1 Retail Sales Business District; class II restaurants are an allowed conditional use in the B-1 District. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: The City Council may grant a conditional use permit as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the City must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1. Consistent with the community management plan; A class II restaurant is a conditional use in the B-1 Retail Sales Business District and is consistent with the community management plan. This criterion is met. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; A class II restaurant does not have additional conditions per the code. This criterion is met. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The proposed restaurant use will be fully contained within the existing multi-tenant building that is currently CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7366 3 adequately served by City services. No exterior or site modifications are proposed. No additional services are required and therefore the criterion is met. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The applicant will be required to obtain the appropriate building permits for the proposed interior remodel. The current multi-tenant building is served by water and sewer and the applicant will be required to make any necessary improvements at the time of building permit. This criterion is met. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The proposed restaurant use is not expected to generate additional public service demand. This criterion is met. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed restaurant use is compatible with the surrounding area. 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West is a multi-tenant building within the B-1 District with a variety of uses including a gas station, salon, professional offices and more. The proposed restaurant will be the only restaurant in the building and will have varying hours which will be beneficial for the shared parking lot. The future land use plan calls out the area for commercial and office uses. The proposed use of a restaurant is compatible both presently and in the future. This criterion is met. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; Wayzata Boulevard has many restaurant uses, so this is consistent with the character for the greater area. The proposed use is compatible with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan by allowing commercial development within a commercial area served by urban services and not adversely impacting residential properties. This criterion is met. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are no proposed site or exterior modifications. The modifications to the interior of the building will not impact the character of the area. Any exterior modifications, such as signage, will fully comply with the code. This criterion is met. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed improvements will not negatively impact the adjacent properties. There are no exterior modifications proposed as part of the proposed restaurant. Parking and traffic will be adequately served by the shared parking lot and entrance drive The applicant will stripe the additional parking spaces identified in the parking plan in order to meet the parking demands of the business. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7366 4 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; No new exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The proposed restaurant use will have their own dumpster that will be placed next to the existing dumpster area on the site. The existing commercial building and parking lot is adequately screened with existing vegetation from the neighboring residential zoning to the north. This criterion is met. 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed use will be completely contained within the existing multi-tenant commercial building. Waste will be properly disposed of within the proposed restaurant’s dumpster and the kitchen will be renovated to meet building code. The proposed restaurant use will not generate or create any nuisance or unsightliness that would impact surrounding uses. If the garbage become a nuciance the city council may consider requiring a trash enclosure for the property. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The proposed restaurant is approximately 1,700 square feet in size. The parking needs are based on the public space of the restaurant which will be approximately 900 square feet. The square footage of public space requires 11 parking spaces, which the applicant has indicated the business has. The restaurant use will be located within a multi-tenant building with a shared parking lot. The uses in the building do not all operate during the same hours. The restaurant will be at its busiest during the dinner hours which is when the other tenants of the building will be closed. The building space has additional parking spaces to the rear that can be used by employees. Deliveries will be made on the side of the building and should not interfere with parking or traffic. The proposed use will not cause any excessive traffic and the parking needs will be satisfied by the existing shared parking lot. If parking becomes a nuisance the city council may consider requiring additional striping of the existing parking lot. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; No exterior or site modifications are proposed as part of the new restaurant use. This criterion is met. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; No changes to the exterior lighting of the site is proposed. This criterion is met; and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The proposed restaurant use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. The addition of a new restaurant business is positive for the community. This condition is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7366 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants the following: A conditional use permit pursuant the opening and operation of a class II restaurant per Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-644 subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the attached plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a zoning permit for the site work and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the conditional use permit will expire on that date (May 8, 2024). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. 6. All parking spaces designated for the restaurant use granted by the CUP must be striped prior the final inspection of the building permit. 7. A trash enclosures or additional striping may be required if the site becomes unsightly or a nuisance. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of May, 2023. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 27' 1i---------34'-6"---------t1 I I lr■;II CABINElS VI z: 23'-6" D GREETING ID I STATION WAITING AREA □□□□□ I EXIT ENTRANCE I -·----32'---- SIZE: A I SCALE: PAGE: 1 OF 1 APPROVED BY: -_ _____._ ORAWN BY: MTS DAlE: 03/19/2023 =fN&����E SPECFlED DESCRIPTION: 1 PLACE DIMS.; =��ES :�.5 TALAVERA Eb�i i:���T\��: 2 PLACE DIMS.; :I: .01 :I: 0.25 1-------�---�----1 3 PLACE DIMS.; :1::1: :.'?!!5 :I: 0.100 PART NUMBER: ANGULAR; .,., FRACTIONAL; :I: 1 /32 FINISH Ra: 125i," 3.2i,m DRAWING NUMBER: REV: Resol No 7366 Exhibit A LA23-000016 3/21/23, 12:54 PM Mail - Karla Parra - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADhiOGU1MTYxLTJhNWItNGNhZi04NTljLTY5OWYwMTY4ZjBlMQAQAOndHgV1uxdHrFUB4Y1LHGI%3…1/1 Keshav Properties LLC, 2160 W Wayzata Blvd, Long Lake, MN-55356 Proposed Restaurant Parking Space Assignment Additional Parking area if needed. Total Parking Space: 11 Spots. Plus additional 6 parking spots if needed. ●Plan for garbage and dumpster area ○We have discussed with the owners of the building and we will be renting our own garbage and recycling dumpsters that can be placed alongside the garbage and dumpsters that are already at the building site.Along with this we have a company that is going to be placing a cylinder so that we can properly dispose of our used kitchen oil. ●Plan for deliveries ○We will designate delivery drivers to drop off any merchandise and groceries around the back,where they will park out of the way of others and we can easily bring them around through the side entrance. This is shown on our parking plan with an arrow where we will have them go. ○Additional parking spaces ■We are aware that some parking spaces are not striped.There are still some logistics that need to be sorted out,and we have not finished discussing with the owners of the building-these items are pending lease signing and then will be designated to who has to pay for what items are being fixed. Lease signature is pending city approval. ●Parking mitigation ○We have living in the Long Lake/Orono area for approximately 20 years.During this time,we have not come to find this building extremely busy at any particular point of the day..We currently do not have a plan specifically for mitigating parking,other than the owners of the building telling us that if we have a need for more parking designated to us,it can be arranged.We are more than open to suggestions and/or ideas. ●Employees ○Our 5 kitchen staff will be working from 10am-10pm,and none of our kitchen employees are able to drive.We will have 3 part time servers,a host,and Karla and Carolina as rotating managers.During our lunch hours we anticipate having 7 employees working at a time,and 9 employees during our dinner hours. Talavera Hello, and thank you for taking the time to listen to our proposal for a new restaurant in Orono. First and foremost, we would like to introduce ourselves. Our names are Karla Parra and Carolina Cano-Garnica. Carolina is my oldest of five children. I also have Gustavo, Carlos, and our twins, Cesar and Frida. Our family has been living in Long Lake for over 20 years. We have 7 Orono School’s graduates, and plan to have more in the future! We have come to build a strong network of family and friends in the area. We will have one business partner named Antonio, who is based in Wisconsin and is solely an investor to our business. This will be a family owned and operated restaurant that will bring a zesty touch of authentic Mexican cuisine to Long Lake. We have had this idea in the works for a few years now, and have been building strong relationships within the restaurant business industry to better understand the demands of running our own. Our inspiration for the name Talavera comes from the 1400th century Spanish Queen Talavera in the Toledo province of Spain, that was then brought to Mexico and used as a decoration for construction of buildings, appliances, and even home decor. This type of earthenware is characterized by colorful, detailed patterns, and a milky glaze. We intend to be an exclusive take on Mexican cuisine and dining experiences, as if you were sitting inside a botanical inspired restaurant in Mexico City. Our dining customers would be open to come and dine with us from 11am-10pm, Monday-Sunday, being able to enjoy either lunch or dinner, as well as offering a full bar, beer, and cocktail menu. We will also offer take out and catering services to our customers. We estimate that we will need about 12 employees to make the restaurant fully functional. This is including cooks, servers, and food runners. 3/21/23, 12:54 PM Mail - Karla Parra - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADhiOGU1MTYxLTJhNWItNGNhZi04NTljLTY5OWYwMTY4ZjBlMQAQAOndHgV1uxdHrFUB4Y1LHGI%3…1/1 Keshav Properties LLC, 2160 W Wayzata Blvd, Long Lake, MN-55356 Proposed Restaurant Parking Space Assignment Additional Parking area if needed. Total Parking Space: 11 Spots. Plus additional 6 parking spots if needed. ●Plan for garbage and dumpster area ○We have discussed with the owners of the building and we will be renting our own garbage and recycling dumpsters that can be placed alongside the garbage and dumpsters that are already at the building site.Along with this we have a company that is going to be placing a cylinder so that we can properly dispose of our used kitchen oil. ●Plan for deliveries ○We will designate delivery drivers to drop off any merchandise and groceries around the back,where they will park out of the way of others and we can easily bring them around through the side entrance. This is shown on our parking plan with an arrow where we will have them go. ○Additional parking spaces ■We are aware that some parking spaces are not striped.There are still some logistics that need to be sorted out,and we have not finished discussing with the owners of the building-these items are pending lease signing and then will be designated to who has to pay for what items are being fixed. Lease signature is pending city approval. ●Parking mitigation ○We have living in the Long Lake/Orono area for approximately 20 years.During this time,we have not come to find this building extremely busy at any particular point of the day..We currently do not have a plan specifically for mitigating parking,other than the owners of the building telling us that if we have a need for more parking designated to us,it can be arranged.We are more than open to suggestions and/or ideas. ●Employees ○Our 5 kitchen staff will be working from 10am-10pm,and none of our kitchen employees are able to drive.We will have 3 part time servers,a host,and Karla and Carolina as rotating managers.During our lunch hours we anticipate having 7 employees working at a time,and 9 employees during our dinner hours. From:Talavera LLC To:Natalie Nye Subject:Re: Parking Plan Date:Wednesday, March 29, 2023 11:27:22 AM Hi, The square footage was determined by 1 parking space per 80 square feet per the owners. As far as the employees it would be 12 total employees and most of them will carpool so they wouldn’t each need a parking space. As far as other businesses that are there as well they are: Orono Gas Station runs from 6am-8pm Monday through Friday. 8am-7pm Saturday and Sunday. Salon 12 runs from 8am-7pm Monday through Friday, 8am-2pm on Saturday, and is closed on Sunday. Orono Coin Laundry is open from 7am-7pm Monday through Friday, and 8am-6:30pm Saturday and Sunday. Haute Dog Luxury Pet Spa is open from 9am-2pm Monday-Thursday and from 8am-1pm on Saturday. X-Sport runs from 10am-6pm Monday-Saturday and 12pm-5pm on Sunday. Rosha Legal is open 8:30am-5pm Monday-Friday. There are a few other others there as well, but I couldn’t find hours of operations for them online. The names are Midthun Tax, Contractor Inc, and American Family Insurance Jared Dornbusch Agency. From what I understand they’re more by appointment but I could be wrong. Thanks! On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:42 AM Natalie Nye <nnye@ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Good Morning, Thank you for the updated information. I have a few follow up questions. 1. What is the square footage of the restaurant space (public space). Was the 1 parking space per 80 square feet used to determine the 11 parking spaces that are needed? 2. What are the other current uses in the building and what are their parking needs? Do these businesses operate at the same time as the restaurant? 3. In the narrative you mentioned that there would be 12 employees. Would that be total or at one time? I just want to ensure there is enough parking for employees and guests. CITY OF ORONO MEMORANDUM DATE: April 27, 2023 TO: City Council FROM: Natalie Nye, Planner RE: 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West CUP – Site Plan Review A conditional use permit for a class II restaurant is currently under review for 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West. A new restaurant, Talavera, is proposed to occupy two existing tenant spaces in the multi-tenant building in the B-1 District. Staff has completed a site plan review in addition to the conditional use permit review. Site plan approval will be issued in conjunction with the conditional use permit approval. Site Plan Review: Evaluation Criteria (City Code 78-145) The City has reviewed the project against the site plan review criteria and has determined that the project: (1) Is compatible with surrounding land uses; The proposed class II restaurant use is in line with the B-1 Zoning District. This standard is met. (2) Preserves existing unique and natural features of the site and minimizes impacts to wetlands, floodplains, and shoreland areas; there are no wetlands or floodplain located on the property. The proposed restaurant is not proposing any exterior or site modifications. This standard is met. (3) Creates harmonious relationship of buildings and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship of the development; the proposed project will be contained within an existing multi -tenant commercial building. No exterior or site modifications are being proposed at this time. This standard is met. (4) Achieves a safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation system; the proposed restaurant’s location is in an existing multi -tenant building with a shared parking lot. The existing building has two entrances off of the county road. This standard is met. (5) Places no excessive demands on services and infrastructure, including local streets; the area is zoned for professional business, no extra demands on infrastructure have been identified as part of the proposed office building project. This standard is met. (6) Conforms to the city's plans for parks, streets, and walkways; The proposed project does not impact the City’s plans for parks, streets, or walkways. This standard is met. (7) Conforms to the Orono Community Management Plan; The proposed restaurant use within the existing building is consistent with the current zoning and the 2040 Community Management plan for the area. (8) Achieves a maximum of safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian movement; The proposed project should stripe all parking spaces that are intended to be used for the restaurant use. (9) Incorporates sufficient landscaping to reasonably screen undesirable features and to enhance the image of the development; The proposed project is not proposing any exterior modifications. The restaurant use will have a private dumpster which will be located near the other dumpsters on the site. If the trash area becomes a nuisance or unsightly, a trash enclosure should be installed. (10) Protects abutting properties and does not create detrimental disturbances to surrounding properties; The proposed project will be contained to the existing building and will not create any additional disturbances. This standard is met. (11) Conforms to all requirements of this chapter unless a variance has been granted. No variances have been granted. The plan conforms to all requirements of the chapter. (12) Incorporates efforts to conserve energy whenever practical. The new business will obtain a building permit for the interior remodel and will be constructed following MN state building code. This standard is met. The City’s Building Official has also completed a preliminary review of the proposed restaurant. A complete review will be done at the time of building permit. The conditional use permit approval is required prior to the submittal of formal building permits. MN Building Code 1. A code analysis will be required. What construction classification was the shell building originally built to - Type I – Type V MNBC 602? What is the occupancy classification MNBC 302 and occupant load MNBC 1004? What Occupancy types (type of business) are on either side of the restaurant? Is there a sprinkler system? 2. It is not clear where the kitchen is in relationship to the dining room. Please show a full floor plan showing both units together. I will need 2 floorplans showing the entirety of the project, both existing and new so it is clearer what the scope of the project is. 3. Are the restrooms part of the restaurant or in an adjacent corridor? Please clarify by including on plans 4. Provide direction of door swing MNBC 1010 and type of hardware MNBC 1010.1.9.4 5. A mop sink is required per MNBC Table 2902.1. 6. An illuminated exit sign will be required MNBC 1008.2 7. A posted occupancy sign will be required 8. Permits required – Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical MN Accessibility Code 1. You must have an accessible pathway/route to all public areas of the restaurant as well as an accessible route to the restrooms. Min 36” wide. MNAC 402 and 1108.2.9 There are currently too many tables as no accessible route is provided. 2. Accessible tables and bar seats must be provided - at least 5% but not less than 1 per MNAC 1108.2.9.1. Accessible tables must have accessible height 20”min – 30” max MNAC 902, knee and toe clearance MNAC 306, and clear floor space positioned for a forward approach MNAC 305. 3. If transactions or services (check writing) will be provided at the greeting station, it will need to be accessible per MNAC 904 Mechanical Code 1. Provide Kitchen hood information. What type is it, Type I or Type II MF&G 507 &508 State Requirements 1. Plumbing plans must submitted to the State for a Plumbing review. 2. A SAC determination is required with Met Council. 3. MN Dept of Health must be contacted MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 12 Kathryn Kallas, 3048 North Shore Drive, the homeowner across the street, also asked about the irregular shape of the lot and said it would be helpful to the neighbors to be able to see what's being proposed and how it is going to be situated. She said there is no one currently living in this home and it was not intended to be a living home for someone per the neighborhood discussion, it was seen as a flip that would take place in the neighborhood. Those of us who live in the neighborhood enjoy this space, enjoy the size of the homes and the properties and how it's been configured over the years. Jeff Zitzloff, 1380 Briar Street, said he does not live in the neighborhood but questioned if the lot line between the existing home and the new lot would create a reasonable set-back. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. Oakden said that zoning district requires a 10-foot setback so as proposed, with portions of the house and patio slated to be removed, as applied it would be a conforming structure relating to setbacks and hardcover. McCutcheon said his biggest concern was the shape of the lot but he supports the shared driveway for safety reasons. He said if you look at the proposed plat it doesn’t make sense but if you look at the zoom out of the houses are pretty close together. Kirchner said that was his concern in asking about the building envelope which appears to be adequate. I always struggle to consider denying something like this when someone is asking to develop land in a conforming manner to our existing ordinances. He said it would not be the smallest lot in the area and would be in the middle of lot sizes in the neighborhood. Kraemer said he finds it a thoughtful subdivision. I like the fact that they are doing the common driveway for safety and aesthetics. I think it fits the character of the neighborhood. It's definitely not a straight property line but there's a lot of crooked property lines in Orono and you can see why this one's required. Libby said he would support the staff recommendation of requiring a maintenance agreement for the shared driveway. I think that eliminates a lot of potential problems. The 2040 plan guides this for one acre so we're beyond that on the on the first site and I would tend to be in favor of this. Bollis noted there are other shared driveways in the area which makes sense on a county road. He added it meets all the checkmarks for what the code requires in a subdivision. Kirchner moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000015, 3017 North Shore Drive, preliminary plat with the stipulation that a driveway and driveway maintenance easement be included trail easement, drainage and utility easement and additional sewer connection as noted by City staff in their recommendation as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 5. LA23-000016 CAROLINA CANO-GARNICA O/B/O KESHAV PROPERTIES LLC, 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CUP MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 12 City Planner Nye said the applicant is to open a new Mexican restaurant at 2160 Wayzata Blvd. West in two vacant spaces in a multi-tenant building with a variety of uses including a gas station. The restaurant will serve liquor which would classify it as a Class II restaurant in the City code which requires a conditional use permit in the B1 zoning district. No exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The business will be able to obtain a sign permit as long as they meet the City sign code. The building has a shared parking lot with 17 parking spaces allocated for the restaurant where 11 parking spaces are required. Six of the parking spaces in the rear are not striped but are intended to be used for overflow or employee parking. Staff recommends that these parking spaces are striped as well. The City code requires that garbage and recycling containers are closed but does not require having a trash enclosure. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss the possibility of adding a condition of a trash enclosure if the garbage area ever becomes a nuisance or an issue. Staff overall finds that the proposed restaurant meets all applicable conditional use permit regulations. The use is compatible with the surrounding area and is appropriate for the district and for the future land use for this site. Ms. Nye said the applicant was present and available for questions. The applicant, Gustavo Cano-Garnica, 985 Old Long Lake Road, said he was also representing his sister, Carolina, who was ill. He said his family of seven has lived in Orono for 20 years. So there is a sense of community as well as that sense of family hospitality. While most restaurants in the community are mainly fast food places, he said, they intend to offer Mexican cuisine and a memorable dining experience. He said they planned a bright and glossy décor and added the restaurant’s peak time will be in the evening and so will not interfere with the other businesses in the center. They expect to have around 12 employees with the employees carpooling and are looking into having the remaining parking spaces striped. Libby asked about adequate handicapped parking spots. Oakden said that is a review done by the City’s building official. If more are needed or desired that can be addressed through the building official at the time of permitting. It would also be possible to make that a condition to ensure that it's addressed as part of the conditional use permit. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. Richie Anderson said he is a long-time Orono resident and is not part of the application. But he just wanted to talk to the character of these folks that are running this gas station. It's a local gas station, first class, great food already. They’re just solid citizens. And if you don't use their place, you should. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Bollis said it looks like a good proposal and does not see any issues. But would like to hear from the other Commissioners. Kraemer also said he didn’t see any issues. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 12 McCutcheon wished the applicants luck and said parking could be revisited later if it would become a problem. But otherwise, he is in favor of it. Erickson said Long Lake started requiring dumpster enclosures in the early 1990s and it's gotten to be accepted over time. He thinks that should be a model as to what we should be looking for in this or other restaurant locations. He feels that should be part of the requirement for not just this location, but any other restaurants that come up. Kirchner said he would struggle with looking at this application and trying to apply an enclosure when we have other existing businesses, restaurant businesses within the City. A broader discussion for potential ordinance review rather than trying to apply it to one singular application is appropriate. Bollis said he would be supportive of seeing if the trash site became a nuisance and if so, possibly requiring an enclosure. McCutcheon moved, Kirschner seconded, to approve LA23-000016, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West, CUP. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. 6.LA23-000017 MURPHY & CO. DESIGN, 746 TONKAWA ROAD, VARIANCES Nye said the applicant is proposing to renovate the existing home at 746 Tonkawa Road including demolishing a detached, non-conforming garage and constructing a new three-car garage nearer the street. Because the proposed garage has its garage doors facing the street the setback requirements increase from 10 to 30 feet. The proposed garage is 10 feet from the rear property line. The applicant is requesting variances for rear-yard setback for the accessory building from 30 feet down to 10 feet and an additional variance for driveway width to allow a 34-foot driveway with where 20-foot is the maximum. The applicant is also requesting a variance from overall hardcover. They are proposing to remove hardcover primarily through the removal of the existing driveway to bring the total down from 35 percent to 32 percent which is still over 25 percent. The applicant has identified the significant topographical changes on the property as a practical difficulty. There is a steep grade change from the street to the house making the current driveway unsafe, especially in the winter months. Constructing a new detached garage closer to the street alleviates those issues. Staff is in agreement with the listed practical difficulties and is supportive of the overall hardcover reduction. Staff recommends approval, however, would like the Planning Commission to discuss the need for a three-bay garage versus a two-bay garage. A two-bay garage could further reduce hardcover and reduce the requested variance for the driveway. The applicant is available to answer questions. Dan Demeules with Murphy and CO Design, 235 Lake St. East Wayzata, spoke as the applicant. The goal of the clients is to keep the house in its existing location reusing the foundation and the main floor. They will be adding a new story to create enough bedrooms for the family. The existing garage is closer to the house than is allowed by current code and has a very steep driveway. Moving the garage will make a safer driveway and entrance to the road, he said, adding there is a lot of precedent for garages right up to the street including a closer one just to the south. We are trying to reduce hardcover as much as possible. Date Application Received: 3/22/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 3/31/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: 5/30/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, City Planner Date: April 17, 2023 Subject: #LA23-000016, Carolina Cano-Garcia o/b/ Keshav Properties LLC 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West CUP - Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing to open a Mexican restaurant at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West. This multi-tenant building is located in the B-1 Retail Sales Business District. Other tenants of the building include; a gas station, salon, laundromat, dog groomer, and professional offices. The proposed restaurant will be a sit-down restaurant that will serve liquor, classifying it as a Class II Restaurant per the City Code. A Class II Restaurant is listed as a conditional use in the B-1 District. The applicant will be renovating the interior of two tenant spaces for the new restaurant, which will total approximately 1,700 square feet. The proposed floorplan for the restaurant is included as Exhibit C. No exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The applicant will need to apply for a separate sign permit and abide by the City’s Sign Code. The restaurant space will require a total of 11 parking spaces. The applicant has provided a parking plan included as Exhibit D. The proposed restaurant has parking available in the shared parking lot that is used by the other tenants of the building. The proposed restaurant will have a total of twelve employees and will be open from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Applicable Regulations: CUP: Restaurant (class II) (Code Section 78-644(4)) Class II Restaurants are permitted within the B-1 District by Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has made an application for a new restaurant, Talavera, at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West. Parking (Code Section 78-1516) The City Code requires a restaurant use have at least one parking space per 80 square feet of public space. The proposed restaurant has approximately 900 square feet of public space resulting in 11 required parking spaces. The applicant has provided a parking plan in Exhibit D, which shows 17 total parking spaces for the use. Seven parking spaces are located in front of the building including one ADA parking space. These spaces will likely be used by customers. In the Application Summary: The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Class II Restaurant within the B-1 District Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE #LA23-000016 APRIL 17, 2023 Page 2 of 5 rear of the space, the applicant shows four additional striped spaces and 6 spaces that are not striped. These will likely be used by employees and for overflow parking. The business is located within a multi-tenant building with a shared parking lot. The building tenants do not all have the same hours of operation, which allow for additional overflow parking for the restaurant during the dinner hours. Staff finds the amount of parking for the restaurant use sufficient. The Planning Commission should consider the condition to stripe the additional spaces that serve the restaurant use that are not currently striped. Waste Materials (Code Section 78-1578) The City Code allows for garbage to be stored in an enclosed building such as a trash enclosure or contained in a closed container. The applicant has stated that the restaurant use will have their own garbage and recycling dumpsters that will be stored in the same area as other dumpsters serving the multi-tenant building. The applicant has also stated that kitchen grease will be properly disposed of in a separate container. The Planning Commission should confirm that these containers are closed containers in order to meet City Code. The Planning Commission should also discuss the possibility of requiring a trash enclosure should the disposal of garbage become unsightly for the building site. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; A class II restaurant is a conditional use in the B-1 Retail Sales Business District and is consistent with the community management plan. This criterion is met. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; A class II restaurant does not have additional conditions per the code. This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The proposed restaurant use will be fully contained within the existing multi-tenant building that is currently adequately served by City services. No exterior or site modifications are proposed. No additional services are required and therefore the criterion is met. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The applicant will be required to obtain the appropriate building permits for the proposed interior remodel. The current multi-tenant building is served by water and sewer and the applicant will be required to make any necessary improvements at the time of building permit. This criterion is met. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The proposed restaurant use is not expected to generate additional public service demand. This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed restaurant use is compatible with the surrounding area. 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West is a multi-tenant building within the B-1 District with a variety of uses including a gas station, salon, professional offices and more. The proposed restaurant will be the only restaurant in the building and will have varying hours which will be beneficial for the shared FILE #LA23-000016 APRIL 17, 2023 Page 3 of 5 parking lot. The future land use plan calls out the area for commercial and office uses. The proposed use of a restaurant is compatible both presently and in the future. This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; Wayzata Boulevard has many restaurant uses, so this is not out of character for the greater area. The proposed use is compatible with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan by allowing commercial development within a commercial area served by urban services and not adversely impacting residential properties. This criterion is met. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are no proposed site or exterior modifications. The modifications to the interior of the building will not impact the character of the area. Any exterior modifications, such as signage, will fully comply with the code. This criterion is met. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed improvements will not negatively impact the adjacent properties. There are no exterior modifications proposed as part of the proposed restaurant. Parking and traffic will be adequately served by the shared parking lot and entrance drive. Staff recommends the Commission consider requiring a condition to stripe the additional parking spaces in order to meet the parking demands of the business. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; No new exterior modifications are proposed at this time. The proposed restaurant use will have their own dumpster that will be placed next to the existing dumpster area on the site. The existing commercial building and parking lot is adequately screened with existing vegetation from the neighboring residential zoning to the north. This criterion is met. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed use will be completely contained within the existing multi-tenant commercial building. Waste will be properly disposed of within the proposed restaurant’s dumpster and the kitchen will be renovated to meet building code. The proposed restaurant use will not generate or create any nuisance or unsightliness that would impact surrounding uses. The Planning Commission should discuss if the proposed dumpsters for the use meet code requirements and if a trash enclosure should be considered. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The proposed restaurant is approximately 1,700 square feet in size. The parking needs are based on the public space of the restaurant which will be approximately 900 square feet. The square footage of public space requires 11 parking spaces, which the applicant has indicated the business has. The restaurant use will be located within a multi-tenant building with a shared parking lot. The uses in the building do not all operate during the same hours. The restaurant will be at its busiest during the dinner hours which is when the other tenants of the building will be closed. The building space has additional parking spaces to the rear that can be used by employees. Deliveries will be made on the side of the building FILE #LA23-000016 APRIL 17, 2023 Page 4 of 5 and should not interfere with parking or traffic. Staff believes the proposed use will not cause any excessive traffic and the parking needs will be satisfied by the existing shared parking lot. The Planning Commission should determine if a condition should be placed on the conditional use permit to stripe any parking spaces that are not currently striped. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; No exterior or site modifications are proposed as part of the new restaurant use. This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; No changes to the exterior lighting of the site is proposed. This criterion is met; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The proposed restaurant use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. The addition of a new restaurant business is positive for the community. This condition is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the applicant’s request to open a new restaurant that serves liquor at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard West to be an appropriate use for the site. The current multi-tenant building has an existing catering kitchen. The applicant plans to use and upgrade this kitchen and take over two vacant tenant spaces for use of a dining room area. No exterior modifications are proposed as this time. The use of a restaurant in this area seems compatible with the neighboring tenants which operate during the day and the anticipated peak times for the restaurant is in the evenings. Public Comments No public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Does the Planning Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the grant ing of the requested CUP? 3. Does the Planning Commission find it necessary to impose conditions related to parking such as the requirement of striping the parking spaces ? 4. The applicant is proposing to bring a new dumpster to the site. Should a dumpster encloser be required with the application? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the Condition Use Permit (CUP) with the condition to stripe the parking lot. FILE #LA23-000016 APRIL 17, 2023 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Floorplan Exhibit D. Parking Plan Exhibit E. Owner Approval Exhibit F. Mailing List & Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Lemons/ L. Oakden Reviewed By: Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to make appointments to the Park Commission and Planning Commission. 2. Background. a. Parks Commission. The Parks Commission is made up of seven regular members who serve three-year terms. In addition, the Commission can have alternate members. The Park Commission is currently one position short of the seven-member committee. b. Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is made up of seven regular members who serve a three-year term. In addition, the Commission can have alternate members. The Planning Commission is currently full for the committee. There are no current alternate positions. 3. New Applicants. a. Michael Huddy has applied to join the Park Commission. Mr. Huddy has prior experience as an Orono Park Commissioner. b. Ted Schultze has applied to join the Planning Commission. Mr. Schultze has been a resident of Orono for over 30 years and has interest in the long-term planning for the community. 4. Interviews. The City Council conducted interviews for the applicants at the April 24, 2023 work session. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the Resolution No. 7367 for Park Commission and Resolution No. 7368 for the Planning Commission Exhibits A. Resolution No. 7367 to Appoint Park Commissioner B. Resolution No. 7368 to Appoint Planning Commissioner Item No.: 18 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Appointment of Parks and Planning Commissioners – Resolution No. 7367 and Resolution No. 7368 Presenter: Joshua Lemons Parks and Golf Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7367 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING APPOINTMENTS TO THE ORONO PARKS COMMISION BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments for the Orono Parks Commission are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Term End Name Park Commissioner March 1st, 2026 Michael Huddy Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held April 24, 2023 ATTEST: ______________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7368 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING APPOINTMENTS TO THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISION BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments for the Orono Planning Commission are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Name Planning Commissioner - Alternate Ted Schultze Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held April 24, 2023 ATTEST: ______________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Lemons Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this agenda item is to gain approval of seasonal employee hiring. 2. Background. The city hires seasonal employees to accomplish a variety of tasks. The hourly pay is proposed to be $14.00-$16.00 for the Golf Course Clubhouse Attendants, Brush Site Attendants, and Sledding Attendants; $14.00-$18.00 for Parks and Golf Course Maintenance Employees, $14.00-$18.00 for Public Works Maintenance Workers, and $14.00 for Administrative Scan Clerk. Seasonal employees fall under the 6-month PERA Classification and are therefore excluded from PERA membership. 3. Seasonal Employee Appointments and Candidates. Name Position Wage (Per hour) Remarks Approved March 13,2023 Jacob Goman Park Maintenance $16.50 Returnee Cal Schmidt GC Maintenance $16.00 Returnee Roger Adams GC Maintenance $14.00 New Hire Max Dailey Clubhouse Attendant $14.50 Returnee Barry Blievernicht Clubhouse Attendant $15.00 Returnee Wendy Middendorf Clubhouse Attendant $15.00 Returnee Paul Tolzmann Clubhouse Attendant $15.00 Returnee Approved Vicki Hines Brush Site Attendant $15.00 Returnee April Rick Rohrer Brush Site Attendant $14.00 New Hire 10, 2023 Sharynn Burchett Brush Site Attendant $14.00 New Hire Approved April 24, 2023 Zachary Conway Park Maintenance $17.00 Returnee Ron Steffenhagen GC Maintenance $16.00 Returnee Alex Collins GC Maintenance $14.50 Returnee Jake Vanyo Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire John Shelp Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Trenton Hansen Clubhouse Attendant $16.00 New Hire Jason Nelson Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Requested May 8, 2023 Steve Hendrickson Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Noah Merz Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employees as listed in the table above. Item No.: 19 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Appointment of 2023 Seasonal Employees V4 Presenter: Joshua Lemons Parks and Golf Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: 1. Purpose. This applicant is requesting informal feedback regarding a lot line rearrangement. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The 60-day deadline is not applicable for a sketch plan application. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant would like to rearrange the lot lines of the properties in order to create two, more uniformly shaped lots. As the lots exist today, they are substandard with regard to area for the LR-1C zoning district. Currently the L-shape of the unaddressed property is not very functional. Normally the purpose of a sketch plan application is to receive feedback on a potential subdivision resulting in a preliminary and final plat applications. In this case, a boundary line adjustment (or lot line rearrangement) can be accomplished administratively as long as there are no new nonconformities created. The boundary line change will result in 2305 Bayview Place (the Green Lot/Easterly Parcel) gaining land and the unaddressed property (the Red Lot/Westerly Parcel) losing land, therefore a new, different nonconforming lot will be created Due to the new nonconformity the boundary line adjustment does not qualify for administrative approval without prior approval of a variance addressing the change/new nonconforming lot. 4. Analysis. Staff finds the existing configuration to be awkward with the L-shaped lot wrapping around the 2305 Bayview property. There are nonconformities in the existing conditions for both properties. While the proposed configuration includes the need for variances on each lot: lot width for the proposed Westerly Lot (Red), and lot width and front yard setback for the proposed Easterly Lot (Green), the orientation may make sense with regard to establishment of increased buildable width for the Western Lot (60-feet increasing to 74-feet) and a more standard lot shape for both lots. 5. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17th the Planning Commission reviewed the application. No public hearing is required for a sketch plan. The Commissioners reviewed the request and provided general support for creating more usable lots. They discussed the potential challenges with topography/grading on the lots, particularly with the new configuration of the Western Lot. The Planning Commission directed the applicant to apply for lot area and width variances in conjunction with an Item No.: 20 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA22-000058 – Matthew Tierney/Shorewood Properties, 2305 Bayview Place & PID 17-117-23-44-0032 (address unassigned) - Sketch Plan Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Community Development Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: administrative Subdivision Exception to move the boundary lines. 6. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received. 7. Recommendation. Staff recommends directing the applicant to apply for Variances and an administrative Subdivision Exception. Staff further recommends a conceptual building footprint and a proposed grading plan be provided for the Westerly Lot as part of the variance application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED While no formal action is required, this memo and the Planning Commission memo will serve as a foundation for the Council’s discussion. Council should review the application and provide non-binding feedback regarding the proposal indicating what can be supported and also identify any challenges or variances to be addressed with a formal land use application. The boundary line changes could be accomplished in one of two ways; both require submittal of a practical difficulty analysis: 1. Variance application + Subdivision Exception (administrative boundary line adjustment); or 2. Preliminary Plat including the identified variances + Final Plat. Council should discuss the two options and provide the applicant with direction regarding their next steps. Exhibits A. Existing & Proposed Survey B. Draft PC Minutes 04/17/2023 C. PC Staff Report 04/17/2023 References PC Exhibits 04/17/2023 A. Application B. Existing & Proposed Survey C. Submitted Hardcover Calculations – Existing Conditions D. Aerial Photo E. City Code Excerpts MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 8. LA22-000058 SHOREWOOD PROPERTIES - MATTHEW TIERNEY, 2305 BAYVIEW PLACE, SKETCH PLAN Curtis said this applicant is unable to be present this evening but has a representative in attendance. The applicant would like to rearrange the lot lines of the subject properties in order to create two regular rectangular-shaped lots. As the lots exists today they are substandard and the L shape of the one lot is not very functional. The resulting lots would still be non-conforming but of a more usual shape. Due to the new nonconformity, the boundary line adjustment does not qualify for administrative approval without prior approval of a variance. No formal action is required this evening, Curtis said, but the Commission should discuss potential issues to be addressed prior to submission of a formal application. She said the proposal could be accomplished in one of two ways and the applicant should be provided the Commission’s preferred direction. Bollis summarized that there are two existing lots today accessed primarily off Bayview. This would not change the number of lots but it would make the existing lots more usable and move one access from Bayview to Navarre Lane. Kirchner said he is familiar with the property and is concerned about a possible steep grade for one lot sloping to Navarre Lane. I just worry about are we creating the best possible lot. Any development onto that is going to have some significant retaining walls. Curtis said the home at 3320 Navarre Lane was constructed within the last five years and has a similar grade. Jacob Conklin, a friend of the applicant, said he would attempt to answer questions from the Commission. My understanding from being there, the elevation change is mostly from the line that is drawn for the new division. That is the most change right there. I don't feel there's much elevation change on that lot. Bollis said he appreciates what Commissioner Kirchner pointed out about the elevation. That's something we should definitely look at and make sure we're not creating a problem with this lot line adjustment. But if that is met by the applicant, I don't see a reason why I wouldn't approve something like this. He noted this proposal takes two non-conforming lots and rearranges them into two non-conforming lots that are more suitable for use. McCutcheon said Orono doesn’t like flag-shaped lots and the proposal makes sense. To me, it seems like a better situation. Libby asked if it would be possible to create one conforming lot from the two lots. Curtis said that could be done but the applicant cannot be required to combine them. Kraemer said it makes sense to do it like this, it just cleans it up. It does not create any new non- conforming lots. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Bollis noted there was no official vote on the proposal at this time it sounds like we're mostly in favor and could approve something like this. I think the sticking point and something they might want to articulate better would be how and where a house could fit on that lot with the typography. Curtis reminded the Commission the application could be handled in two ways. The applicant can make a formal variance application for the non-conformities that have been listed, and then proceed, if approved, with an administrative boundary line adjustment, or they can be directed to make a formal preliminary plat application so they would be re-platting the lots rather than rearranging the lot lines with variances. Commissioners said they thought the variance process would be simpler and the best approach. Date Application Received: 10/21/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/21/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: NA To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 17 April 2023 Subject: #LA22-000058, Matthew Tierney/Shorewood Properties, 2305 Bayview Place & PID 17-117-23-44-0032 (address unassigned) Sketch Plan Review Background The applicant would like to rearrange the lot lines of the above-mentioned properties to create two, rectangular shaped lots. As the lots exist today, they are substandard with regard to area for the LR- 1C zoning district. Currently the L-shape of the unaddressed property is not very functional. Normally the purpose of a sketch plan application is to receive feedback on a potential subdivision resulting in a preliminary and final plat applications. In this case, a boundary line adjustment (or lot line rearrangement) can be accomplished administratively as long as there are no new nonconformities created. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting non-binding feedback on a proposal involving variances to reorient the two properties as noted. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff requests direction. FILE # LA22-000058 17 April 2023 Page 2 of 3 The boundary line change will result in 2305 Bayview Place (the Green Lot/Easterly Parcel) gaining land and the unaddressed property (the Red Lot/Westerly Parcel) losing land, therefore a new, different nonconforming lot will be created Due to the new nonconformity the boundary line adjustment does not qualify for administrative approval without prior approval of a variance addressing the change/new nonconforming lot. Sketch Plan Review Parameters While the applicant has requested a Sketch Plan review, this application should either be a variance submittal or a sketch plan review for a preliminary plat. The applicant is not proposing to create additional building lots. Two lots exist currently with the goal of two lots in a different configuration. As a sketch plan review, any comments or suggestions to the applicants are non-binding but will be extremely helpful as the applicant moves forward toward a preliminary plat application. Lot Analysis The properties are within the LR-1C district requiring ½ acre in area, 100 feet in width, and are limited to 35% (Tier 3) hardcover. The proposed rearrangement results in Section 78-LR-1C – Lot Area/Width: LR-1C District Requirements Existing: Unaddressed Lot (PID 17-117-23- 44-0032) Existing: 2305 Bayview Proposed Westerly / Red Lot Proposed Easterly / Green Lot (2305 Bayview) Lot Area 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 10,469 s.f. (0.24 acre) 11,199 s.f. (0.26 acre) ±9,045 s.f. (0.21 acre) ±12,623 s.f. (0.29 acre) Lot Width 100-feet ±35 feet along Navarre Ln & 60 feet along Bayview Pl 128.5 feet on Bayview Pl & 140 feet on Navarre Ln 86 feet on Navarre Ln. Measured at 74- feet at the building setback line. 188.5 feet on Bayview Pl & 87 feet on Navarre Ln Setbacks Met? Front = 30’ Rear = 30’ Side Street = 15’ Side = 10’ Currently vacant, but setbacks could be met. Bayview is defined as the front. Front yard setback not met. Side, side street and rear setbacks met. Navarre Lane will be the defined front. Setbacks are able to be met. Navarre Lane will be defined as the front. Existing home is at 26.9 feet from Navarre Ln & will not meet the required 30- foot front setback. The side, rear and side street setbacks will be met. Hardcover Met? Tier 3 = 35% Vacant 25% limit* The existing hardcover is ±20% Vacant 2,261 sf = 25% allowed* 4,421 s.f. = 35% allowed 2,233 s.f. = 18% proposed *According to City Code 78-72, hardcover is limited to 25% for an existing undeveloped nonconforming lot in the Shoreland Overlay District. FILE # LA22-000058 17 April 2023 Page 3 of 3 Analysis The existing configuration is awkward with the L-shaped lot wrapping around the 2305 Bayview property. There are existing nonconformities in the existing conditions for both properties as outlined in the above table. While the proposed configuration includes the need for variances on each lot: lot width for the proposed Westerly Lot, and lot width and front yard setback for the proposed Easterly Lot, the orientation may make sense with regard to establishment of increased buildable width for the Western Lot (60-feet increasing to 74-feet) and a more standard lot shape for both lots. Public Comments This application does not require a public hearing. To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the reorientation of the properties will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested change? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation While no formal action is required, this memo will serve as a foundation for the Planning Commission’s discussion with the applicant to bring to light potential issues for discussion and issues to be addressed prior to submission of a formal application. The proposal could be accomplished in one of two ways, both require submittal of a practical difficulty analysis: 1. Variance application + Subdivision Exception (administrative boundary line adjustment); or 2. Preliminary Plat including the identified variances + Final Plat. The planning commission should discuss the two options and provide the applicant with direction regarding their next steps. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing & Proposed Survey Exhibit C. Submitted Hardcover Calculations – Existing Conditions Exhibit D. Aerial Photo Exhibit E. City Code Excerpts AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding an average lakeshore setback variance. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on March 21, 2023 and considered to be complete on March 29, 2023. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on May 28, 2023. 3. Background/ Summary. This application is for the to-be- created “Blue Lot” (address to be assigned 1007 Wildhurst Trail) depicted in Exhibit D. The applicants are proposing to redevelop the Blue Lot with a new single-family home. The undeveloped rights-of-way surrounding the properties were vacated in December 2022 (Resolution No. 7327; Exhibit D). The applicants have also applied for administrative approval (Subdivision Exception, File LA23-000018) to combine and rearrange the properties resulting in the layout shown on the right. This change is currently in process with Hennepin County and is not yet reflected on their online GIS map. The three existing PIDs will be combined to create two buildable lakeshore lots. The existing home at 1003 Wildhurst Trail (the “Red Lot”) is planned to remain; the Red Lot is not part of this application. The Council should treat the proposed Blue Lot as existing for the variance analysis. 4. Variance Description. The applicants have proposed a home location at the 75-foot setback which is entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. The orientation of the adjacent lakeshore property to the north, at 4455 West Branch Road, and the Red Lot results in the average lakeshore setback line bisecting the Blue Lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home on the Blue Lot as shown on Exhibit B to allow construction of a new home up to the 75-foot lake setback. 5. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variance. 6. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received. 7. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval conditioned upon Hennepin County accepting the proposed lot line rearrangement which will create the Blue and Red Lots. Item No.: 21 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: LA23-000014 – Matthew & Susanne Johnson, 1007 Wildhurst Trail (previously unaddressed), Variance – Resolution No. 7364 Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Planning Department Report New Lot Configuration New Lot Configuration OVERLAY. ALS = white line NOT to Scale AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: LLO Approved By: COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt Resolution No. 7364 attached as Exhibit A. Exhibits A. Proposed Resolution No. 7364 B. Proposed Plans & Narrative C. Resolution No. 7327 (Vacation) D. Draft PC Minutes 04/17/2023 E. PC Staff Report 04/17/2023 References PC Exhibits 04/17/2023 A. Application & Narrative B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Proposed Survey *lot line change in process* D. Proposed House Location Aerial Photo Exhibit E. Resolution No. 7327 F. Aerial with New Lot Lines G. Property Owners List H. Plat Map CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7364 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA23-000014 WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, Matthew Johnson and Susanne Johnson (hereinafter the “Applicants”), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1007 Wildhurst Trail and legally described as: Attached as Exhibit A (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance by a 6 to 0 vote; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: A1. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above-mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. A3. The Property contains 1.49 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 150 feet. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7364 2 A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. A5. Applicant has applied for an average lakeshore setback variance. A6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: B1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The lot includes difficulties due to the channel nature of the shoreline and location of adjacent lots/homes. The purpose of the Ordinance is to protect the lake views enjoyed from neighboring properties. The proposed home location will not impact the existing views from the home at 4455 West Branch Road. The proposed home will be behind the 75’ setback. B2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The average lakeshore setback is extreme, and there are instances when the City has granted variances to the average lakeshore setback when the home does not encroach in the 75’ setback or disrupt the neighboring views. Construction of a home in the proposed location will not impair views from adjacent properties. The proposed variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. B3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the home in the proposed location within the average lakeshore setback is reasonable and preserves the intent of the ordinance by not disrupting the view of the lake by neighboring properties. This criterion is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7364 3 b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The orientation of the shoreline and location of the neighboring homes are out of the Applicants’ control and create an average lakeshore setback that is unnecessarily onerous. However, the Applicants are reorienting the three existing PIDs into two lakeshore lots which does create challenges when applying the average lakeshore setback. Siting the home in a conforming location inland would adversely impact the Applicants’ views of the lake; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The variance is requested in order to permit construction of a home at 75-foot lake setback which will be designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. The proposed home in the proposed location will not impact the existing lake views enjoyed by the adjacent properties which determine the average lakeshore setback line. B4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. B5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. B6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. The Property is a lakeshore lot; the application of the average lakeshore setback in this circumstance would adversely impact the lake access and views for the Applicants and would result in no added viewshed benefit to the adjacent properties. B7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. B8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The unique channel shoreline resulting in the severe setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties in developing the Property consistent with the other homes in the same neighborhood. B9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The Property’s channel shoreline positioning combined with the CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7364 4 relationship between the existing home and the setback of the homes on adjacent properties creates difficulties for the Applicants. B10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” Granting the average lakeshore setback variance preserves the Applicants’ rights to views and enjoyment of the lake enjoyed by other lakeshore property owners. B11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. B12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The majority of the homes along this channel are situated approximately 75 feet to 125 feet from the lake; constructing a home behind the average lakeshore setback would be out of character for the immediate channel lakeshore neighborhood. The requested variance would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback; subject to the following conditions: C1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. C2. The approved home location shall conform to all Zoning requirements with the exception of the average lakeshore setback as depicted on the attached Exhibit B. Further, the home footprint is not limited to that which is shown in Exhibit B. C3. Any development of the Property which is not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. C4. Variance approval is subject to the recording of the boundary line adjustment according to the Subdivision Exception Certificate LA23-000018 with Hennepin County. No construction will be permitted prior to the Subdivision Exception being successfully recorded with Hennepin County. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7364 5 C5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (May 8, 2024). C6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of May, 2023. CITY OF ORONO: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk That part of the following parcel: The West 1/2 of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 1; All of Block 3 The West 1/2 of Lots 1 and 2, and all of Lots 9 to 16 inclusive, Block 4 and That part of the West 1/2 of Lots 3 to 8, inclusive, Except that part of the Southerly 220 feet of said Lots lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the center of the South line of Lot 8; thence to a point on the West line of Lot 3, said point measured 220 feet North from the South line of Block 4, All in Mount Home Park. Together with: Those parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place, Hattie Place and the Alley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail) Those parts of LaFayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west 1/2 of Lots 8- 14, Block 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence North 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds West, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 150.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence continuing along the last described line a distance of 156.69 feet; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, parallel with said north line, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 160.02 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 96.84 feet to said east line; thence North 01 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds East, along said east line, a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning. described as lying north of the following line: Beginning at the aformentioned said Point "A"; thence South 88 degrees 17 minutes, 15 seconds East, parallel to said north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 509.02 feet to the east line of said West Half of Lots 8 through 14, Block 1, Mount Home Park and there terminating. Narrative – 1003 Wildhurst Trail - variance The existing parcel has 3 PID’s. In Exhibit A, the ALS line for the lake lots is lakeward of the 75’ setback. Making the 75’ setback the further measurement back from the lake. The ALS is measured from the house to the north to first lakeshore house to the south (See Yellow line) When the density is reduced from three lots to two, the ALS moves the setback line from the house to the north to the existing property on the lot. In doing so, it unjustly reduces the buildable area by over 50%. The ALS is in place to prevent neighbors from moving lakeward of each other to protect the view of the lake. In this case, the ALS is not achieving what it is intended to prevent. The ALS requirement should be removed and only the 75’ setback should be required. 1 LAND TYPE Torrens (T) DOC NUM 5991535 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Dec 20, 2022 12:42 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Amber Bougie, Registrar of Titles Daniel Rogan, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 92 Pkg ID 2523902E Document Recording Fee 46.00 Document Total 46.00 Existing Certs 1549909 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. 4L0I\! \ CITY OF ORONO litic.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No.7327 A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City of Orono, (the "City") has jurisdiction over the Public Right-of-Way as described in attached Exhibit A ("Right-of-Way"); and WHEREAS, Matt Johnson(the "Owner") owns land abutting the Right-of-Way, addressed 1003 Wildhurst Trail(PID 07-117-23-21-0016 and PIDs 07-117-23-21-0006; 07-117-23-21-0007; 07- 117-23-21-0016; 07-117-23-21-0002); and WHEREAS, the Owner has filed a petition seeking a vacation of the Right-of-Way as depicted in attached Exhibit B ("Proposed Vacation"); and WHEREAS,there is an existing City sewer utility and Wright-Hennepin Electrical Cooperative overhead electric service line in the Proposed Vacation within the Hattie Place right-of-way which is serving a public purpose; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of the Proposed Vacation was submitted to the Commission of the DNR by certified mail for their comment on September 20, 2022. WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, notice of a public hearing on the vacation of the Right-of-Way was published in the Laker Pioneer Newspaper on November 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was posted at the Long Lake and Crystal Bay Post Offices on November 4, 2022; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, said notice of public hearing was mailed to each property owner affected by the Proposed Vacation on November 4, 2022, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono City Council heard all interested parties on the question of the vacation of Right-of-Way at a public hearing opened on November 21, 2022 in the City of Orono City Council Chambers; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, makes the following: FINDINGS 1. There is existing City sewer utility infrastructure and a Wright-Hennepin Electrical Cooperative overhead electric service line in the Proposed Vacation 223254v1 within the Hattie Place right-of-way. The City will retain its existing 30-foot utility easement which extends from the northern end to Wildhurst Trail. The easement retained for utilities is depicted in Exhibit B and described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place and Lafayette Avenue, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the north line of Lafayette Avenue, west of the east line of Hattie Place and its northerly extension and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). 2. The Proposed Vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. No adjacent or nearby properties will have their access limited by it. 3. The City does not intend to develop, improve, or use the existing rights-of-way for road or lake access purposes. 4. The unimproved subject rights-of-way, as they exist, serve no public purpose. 5. For the foregoing reasons, it is in the public interest to vacate only the rights-of-way as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B. DECISION NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the Right-of-Way legally described and depicted in Exhibits A and B is hereby vacated. 2. The utility easement in favor of the City will be retained and maintained for utility purposes over Hattie Place. 3. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 412.851,the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO this 12t1 day of December, 2022. Mayor ATTEST: ity Clerk 223254v1. EXHIBIT A—Resolution No. 7327.. Description of Existing Public Right-of-Way Those parts of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place,Hattie Place and the Alley in Blocks 3 and 4, as dedicated to the public in the plat of Mount Home Park described as follows: Those parts of Hattie Place lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue (now known as Wildhurst Trail). Those parts of Lafayette Avenue lying east of the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 117,Range 23, Hennepin Country, Minnesota and west of the northerly extension of the east line of the west 1/2 of Lots 8- 14, Block 1, Mount Home Park. Those parts of Grandview Place lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 8,Block 1 to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 3, all in Mount Home Park. Those parts of the Alley in the middle of Blocks 3 and 4 lying south of the south line of Lafayette Avenue and north of the north line of Oak Glen Avenue(now known as Wildhurst Trail). 223254v1 Exhibit B - Resolution No. 7327: Depiction of the Right-of-Way to be Vacated IN THE PLAT F MOUNT HOME ARK I HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 14\ LAFAYETTE AVENUE N1 ;14 1J i4 2 I J. I 13 2 I 13 3 1 12 N 3 A2 4 11 4 7+ 151Dk)J 5 1 9 6 I J 9 H8 : \ 7Ifr__ _J 1 ; W 16 -' J g 1 16 2 1 = 15 6 L J I 1 L 15 3 14 sill 1 L 14 4 1 134 \ 1 4 2 13 51 A w I I 12 5 0 1 J it Z L 12 6 ; 1 ! 1` \ 6 L 11 7 1 10 I 81 9 L a I J 9 L OAK GLEN AVENUE (WILDHURST TRAIL) o 1 00 200 400 6 Norniom. iiii SCALE IN FEET TO BE VACATED E I I I I4. : UTILITY EASEMENTi III I. TO BE RESERVED MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3. LA23-000014 SUSANNE & MATTHEW JOHNSON, 1007 WILDHURST TRAIL, VARIANCE City Planner Curtis said the purpose of the application is to consider an average lakeshore setback variance on the newly oriented lot at 1007 Wildhurst Trail. The existing home at 1003 Wildhurst would remain and is not part of this application. The applicant is in the process of designing a new home for the 1007 lot. The homes on 1003 Wildhurst and 4455 West Branch Road create an average Lakeshore setback line bisecting the center of the subject lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction up to the 75-foot setback. Approval would be subject to the County approving the pending lot line changes. The applicants have identified the unique lake channel orientation for both the new lot and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch Road to the north as creating difficulties. Applicants are in attendance. Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the properties along the lakeshore channels create an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property which is restricting development near the lake. Staff recommends the planning commission discuss whether the proposal fits within the character of neighborhood, whether practical difficulties exist, and whether or not there is any lake view impact to consider. Staff recommends approval. Bollis clarified that the proposal would meet the 75-foot setback but it’s the average setback for which the variance is being requested. Matt Johnson, 1003 Wildhurst Trail, said there are currently three PIDs on this property. There is a large, undeveloped chunk of land purchased when there was talk of putting seven or eight houses in there and neighbors wanted to keep density lower. So in an effort to reduce the density of this area, his proposal was to bring it down to two lots. And then in doing so, the average lakeshore setback gets connected from the property to the north, and then connects to the property at 1003 Wildhurst Trail that he also owns. Average lakeshore setback was intended to preserve the lake views between neighbors and lake. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. Kirchner said it reminded him of another case a few months ago. In reality, we are looking at a two-lot application here, not a three-lot. McCutcheon said if it was three we wouldn’t be talking about this. One house is extremely on the west side but since they are combining, it’s a lakeshore lot. Where the house is located now it makes a lot of sense. As you look at the neighborhood to the south they are all about that distance from the lake, so I think it fits the character of the neighborhood. Bollis said it goes back to the intent of the ordinance. I don’t think it creates an issue with sight lines. Kirchner said the property is heavily wooded. Because of woods I don’t even know what sight lines would be there. Libby said staff has done a good job and given us a lot of good information. The applicant has tried to position the house so does not obstruct any other lake views. I’m in favor of this but we still have to have the County to chime in on this because of the subdivision of the lot. Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000014, 1007 Wildhurst Trail, variance. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 03/21/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/29/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/28/2023 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 17 April 2023 Subject: #LA23-000014, Matthew & Susanne Johnson, 1007 Wildhurst Trail (previously unaddressed) Variance Public Hearing Background The applicants are proposing to redevelop the property with a new single- family home. The undeveloped rights-of-way surrounding the properties were vacated in December 2022 (Resolution No. 7327; Exhibit D). The applicants have also applied for administrative approval (Subdivision Exception, File LA23- 000018) to combine and rearrange the properties resulting in the layout shown on the right. This change is currently in process with Hennepin County and is not yet reflected on their online GIS map. The three existing PIDs will be combined to create two buildable lakeshore lots. This application is for the to-be-created “Blue Lot” (address to be assigned 1007 Wildhurst Trail) depicted in Exhibit D. The existing home at 1003 Wildhurst Trail (the “Red Lot”) is planned to remain. The Red Lot is not part of the application. The applicant is in the process of designing a new home for the Blue Lot reflected in Exhibit F. Approval of the proposed variance will be conditioned on Hennepin County accepting the proposed lot line rearrangement with will create the Blue and Red Lots. The Planning Commission should treat the proposed Blue Lot as existing for the variance analysis. The orientation of the adjacent lakeshore property to the north, at 4455 West Branch Road, results in the average lakeshore setback line bisecting the Blue Lot. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home on the Blue Lot as shown on Exhibit F to allow construction up to the 75-foot lake setback. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B. They have noted the unique lake channel orientation for both the Blue Lot and the adjacent lakeshore property on West Branch creating difficulties and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Application Summary: The applicants are requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to redevelop the subject property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. New Lot Configuration New Lot Configuration OVERLAY. ALS = white line NOT to Scale FILE # LA23-000014 17 April 2023 Page 2 of 5 Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff agrees with the applicants that the unique orientation of the properties along the lakeshore channels creates an extreme average lakeshore setback across the subject property restricting development near the lake. Although the applicants’ proposed location will likely not adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the owners of the West Branch property it does not render the property unbuildable. There is a conforming building envelope on the property to support the applicant’s proposed home footprint. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 & 78-1279 - Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear 30’ NA ~250’ North Side 10’ NA ~10’ South Side 10’ NA ~10’ Lakeshore 75’ NA ~75’ Average Lakeshore The required setback varies between approximately 120-feet and 200- feet from the lake. The proposed home is shown at approximately 75- foot setback which results in an approximate encroachment of 50 to 100 feet for the new home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. Section 78- 350 - Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140’ Proposed 65,113 s.f. (1.49 acres) ±150’ Section 78-1403- Structural Building Coverage: The property will be required to adhere to the 20% structural coverage limitation. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 - Hardcover Calculations: The property will be required to have a conforming hardcover level of 25% or less. Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The Blue Lot is situated at the end of a narrow channel off of the lake. The surrounding properties also share this unique shoreline. The neighboring home to the north (4455 West Branch Road) fronts the lake via a different channel; it is unclear whether or not this property has a dock accessing the lake. The West Branch home is separated by approximately 500-feet from the proposed home location. The line from the West Branch home is draw across the subject property to the existing home on the 1003 Wildhurst Trail property. The result is a large average lakeshore setback over the subject property. Based on the location of the average lakeshore setback line, locating the home behind the average lakeshore setback line may impact the applicants’ views of the lake significantly. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend FILE # LA23-000014 17 April 2023 Page 3 of 5 approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The lot includes difficulties due to the channel nature of the shoreline and location of adjacent lots/homes. The purpose of the Ordinance is to protect the lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties across the subject property. It is unlikely the proposed home location will impact the existing views from the West Branch property. Further, the proposed home will be behind the 75’ setback. However, there is a building envelope on the property which will allow for channel/lake views. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The average lakeshore setback is extreme, and there are instances when the City has granted variances to the average lakeshore setback when the home does not encroach in the 75’ setback or disrupt the neighboring views. Again, it is worth noting that there is a conforming building envelope allowing for lake views on the subject property. Construction of a home in the proposed location would not impair views from adjacent properties; the proposed variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home in the proposed location within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable from the standpoint of preservation of neighboring lake views. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The orientation of the shoreline and location of the neighboring homes are out of the landowners’ control. However, the owners are reorienting the three existing PIDs into two lakeshore lots which does create challenges when applying the average lakeshore setback. Siting the home in a conforming location inland would adversely impact the applicants’ views of the lake; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is requested in order to permit construction of a home at 75-foot lake setback which will be designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the applicants. The proposed home in the proposed location will not impact the existing lake views enjoyed by the adjacent properties which determine the average lakeshore setback line. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. The FILE # LA23-000014 17 April 2023 Page 4 of 5 property is a lakeshore lot; the application of the average lakeshore setback in this circumstance would adversely impact the lake access and views for the applicants and would result in no added viewshed benefit to the adjacent properties. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The unique channel shoreline resulting in the the severe setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties in developing the property consistent with the other homes in their neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s channel shoreline positioning combined with the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the homes on adjacent properties creates difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The property has a conforming building envelope where a new home can be sited. Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is not necessary for development of the property; however, granting the average lakeshore setback variance preserves the owners’ rights to views and enjoyment of the lake enjoyed by other lakeshore property owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The majority of the homes along this channel are situated approximately 75 feet to 125 feet from the lake; constructing a home behind the average lakeshore setback would be out of character for the immediate channel lakeshore neighborhood. The requested variance would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Staff has received requests to view the plans and fielded some questions from the public but as of this writing, staff has not received any comments regarding this application. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission should discuss the following: Whether or not the proposal fits within the character of the neighborhood; FILE # LA23-000014 17 April 2023 Page 5 of 5 Is the proposal supported by practical difficulty considering there is a legal building envelope on the property? Considering the fact that the northern property is approximately 500 feet away from the proposed home location, is there any lake view impact by granting this variance? Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance for the average lakeshore setback. Construction of the home up to the 75-foot lake setback should not impede on the two neighboring properties views of the lake. Approval of the variance should be contingent upon Hennepin County accepting the property line changes (Subdivision Exception application LA23-000018). List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey *lot line change in process* Exhibit D. Proposed House Location Aerial Photo Exhibit Exhibit E. Resolution No. 7327 Exhibit F. Aerial with New Lot Lines Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: RJO Reviewed By:A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to gain approval to pay invoice #20230012 from the City of Long Lake for the 2022 Fire Department overage. 2. Background. The City currently contracts for fire services with the City of Long Lake. The annual contract fee is calculated based on an allocation formula applied to the approved annual budget. Because budgets often vary from actual expenditures, Section 13 of the contract calls for an annual comparison of budgeted to actual costs. It includes the following language regarding the annual comparison: The actual costs set forth for the prior contract year may result in either a surplus or deficit with respect to the to that year’s Annual Operating Budget. Any surplus shall be refunded to the contract cities in the same ratio as the cost allocation formula. Any deficit shall be funded by the contract cities in the same ratio as the cost allocation formula. In 2022, the comparison resulted in a budget overage of $54,130. Orono’s share of the overage (85%) is $46,010.50. At the April 24th council meeting, the council had questions regarding the bill and did not approve payment of the overage. Staff has reviewed the overages with Long Lake and has agreed that they are all related to the 2022 fire department budget year. In consultation with the City Attorney staff agrees that the invoice should be paid as presented. 3. Cost. The invoice is in the amount of $46,010.50. 4. Funding. The invoice will be paid from the 2023 Fire Department operating budget. This department will be over budget for the year. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Council approves payment of invoice number 20230012 to the City of Long Lake. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve Long Lake invoice #20230012 for the 2022 Fire Department budget overage. Attachments: 1. Invoice 20230012 2. Surplus/Deficit billings Item No.: 22 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: 2022 Long Lake Fire Overage Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Finance Report 450 Virginia Avenue P.O. Box 606 Long Lake MN 55356 952-473-6961 sweske@longlakemn.gov Invoice No. 20230012 Date 4/5/2023 FIREUpon Receipt CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 Amount To: Scott Weske Shipped Ship Via Terms Contract Contact Customer PO# Description LONG LAKE, MN $46,010.502022 Fire Dept Budget Overage Per Contract Special Instructions SubTotal $46,010.50 Shipping $0.00 TOTAL $46,010.50 If you have any questions concerning this invoice please call the Finance Officer, Amanda Nowezki at 952-473-6961 x3. Thank you ThankYou ! Tax $0.00 *20230012* PAID $0.00 5 Year History LL Fire Annual Reconciliation Charges Refunds 2018 - - 2019 - 3,725.00 2020 - - 2021 15,521.00 - 2022 46,010.50 - Account Account Budget Number Description Total Actual Difference Comments 1000 FT Chief Sal $108,081 $123,138 $15,057 Payout of sick/Vacation 1060/1065 Fire Call Pay $59,650 $81,287 $21,637 Most calls in 5+ years 1075 Training Pay $38,060 $37,746 -$314 1080 Fire Officer Pay $17,480 $18,586 $1,106 1210 PERA $19,000 $19,047 $47 1220 FICA $11,141 $11,920 $779 1310 Employer Paid Health $12,665 $13,617 $952 1510 Work Comp Ins $30,000 $34,437 $4,437 Larger increase than expected Subtotal Sal & Benefits $296,077 $339,778 $43,701 2010 Office Supplies $1,000 $1,746 $746 2030 Printed Forms $500 $591 $91 2080 Training/ Instruct Materials $750 $80 -$670 2120 Motor Fuels $10,000 $14,945 $4,945 Most calls in 5+ years 2150 Shop Supplies $1,400 $2,807 $1,407 2160 Chemicals / Foam $1,200 $662 -$538 2175 Fire Prevention Materials $1,200 $1,480 $280 2180 Uniforms $500 $346 -$154 2190 Medical Supplies $1,800 $3,812 $2,012 2210 Equipment Parts $3,000 $4,097 $1,097 2215 SCBA Equipment Parts $700 $168 -$532 2230 Bldg & Grounds Maint Supp $1,250 $787 -$463 2400 Small Tools $6,000 $5,726 -$274 2410 Protective Gear / Uniforms $8,000 $4,483 -$3,517 2415 Turn Out Gear $18,000 $18,155 $155 Subtotal Supplies $55,300 $59,885 $4,585 3000 Prof Services(Lexipol SOP Hose&Lad $11,500 $15,788 $4,288 Exam and Mask fitting ($5100) City of Long Lake LL Fire Department Operating Expenses 2022 Operating Budget Account Account Budget Number Description Total Actual Difference Comments City of Long Lake LL Fire Department Operating Expenses 2022 Operating Budget 3010 Auditing/Accounting Services for RA $4,000 $4,000 $0 3050 Physicals Other Medical $13,500 $14,267 $767 3090 Computer Software Support $1,250 $1,733 $483 3090 Computer Network Support $0 $0 $0 3110 W.A.F.T.A. Dues $2,000 $2,000 $0 3120 Legal Fees $2,000 $442 -$1,558 3150 LL Administration Fee $18,000 $18,000 $0 3210 Telephone (Land Lines)$0 $0 $0 3230 Cell Phones (Nextel/Sprint)$4,550 $4,396 -$154 3235 800 mHz Radio Admin Fee $14,700 $15,581 $881 3275 Internet (MediaCom)$14,800 $14,858 $58 3280 Pagers / Radios (Ancom)$4,500 $1,410 -$3,090 3310 Travel / Mileage Reimb $0 $5,609 $5,609 3350 Education / Conferences $26,000 $43,754 $17,754 Training/Certs for 8+ new FFs 3355 Motor Vehicle Lic & Reg $0 $84 $84 3610 General Liability Insurance $6,000 $8,609 $2,609 3700 Insurance Broker Fee $0 $0 $0 3810 Electricity Exp (Excel)$14,000 $13,582 -$418 3820 City Water/Sewer/Storm $4,900 $5,144 $244 Was on the line above 3830 Natural Gas (CenterPoint)$7,250 $9,386 $2,136 3840 Custodial & Waste Removal $13,300 $14,939 $1,639 3845 Lawn & Turf Maintenance $2,500 $1,293 -$1,207 4010 Bldg Maint & Repair $19,000 $13,092 -$5,908 4030 Light Truck Maint/Repair $7,500 $6,040 -$1,460 4035 Heavy Truck Maint/Repair $15,500 $18,706 $3,206 4040 Other Equip/Boat Maint $5,000 $17,250 $12,250 Winterizeing B11 ($4915) and add Account Account Budget Number Description Total Actual Difference Comments City of Long Lake LL Fire Department Operating Expenses 2022 Operating Budget 4045 Insurance Claim Expenses $250 $250 $0 4125 Copier Operating Lease $0 $0 $0 4135 Copier Maintenance $650 $88 -$562 4300 Miscellaneous $1,500 $1,583 $83 4330 Dues & Subscriptions $2,200 $3,031 $831 4450 Meeting Supplies $500 $3,615 $3,115 4+ EMT refresher meals 4600 Recognition Expenditures $1,000 $120 -$880 Subtotal Purchased Svcs $217,850 $258,650 $40,800 5710 Computer/Printer Replac $2,000 $2,516 $516 5800 Other Equip $2,000 $3,549 $1,549 lifevests and pump for kodiak Subtotal Capital $4,000 $6,065 $2,065 Total LLFD Op Budget 573,227$ $664,378 $91,151 Budget Actual Difference Contract Revenues Orono 455,941$ 455,941$ -$ Long Lake 54,000$ 54,000$ -$ Medina 26,727$ 26,727$ -$ Minnetonka Beach 27,910$ 27,910$ -$ Total Contract Revenues 564,578$ 564,578$ -$ Other Revenues FD Rent 4,650.00$ 4,646.00$ Donations 10,175.00$ 10,175$ Non contrc rev 2,605.00$ 2,605$ FD training grant 28,244.00$ 28,244$ Total Other Revenues 4,650$ 45,670$ 41,020$ Total Fire Dept Revenues 569,228$ 610,248$ 41,020$ Budget Actual Total 2022 Income 569,228$ 610,248$ Total 2022 Expenses 573,227$ $664,378 Amount Due (3,999)$ (54,130)$ City of Long Lake 2022 Operating Budget Other Revenues FD Rent 4,650.00$ 4,646.00$ Donations 10,175.00$ 10,175$ Non contrc rev 2,605.00$ 2,605$ FD training grant 28,244.00$ 28,244$ Total Other Revenues 4,650.00$ 45,670.00$ 41,020$ Total Fire Dept Revenues 569,228$ 610,248$ 41,020$ Budget Actual Total 2022 Income 569,228$ 610,248$ Total 2022 Expenses -$ $0 Amount Due 569,228$ 610,248$ AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: JVE Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to answer council questions and receive initial input on the draft Fire Needs Assessment as well as establish a process for the Fire Department Needs Assessment Process. 2. Background. In 2021, the City of Orono notified the City of Long Lake that we would not be extending the current fire service agreement. Following negotiations for the transfer of the existing fire department to Orono control were unfruitful, in September of 2022, the City Council passed a resolution of intent to establish the Orono Fire Department. At the November 14th meeting the council appointed a new Fire Chief to build and then lead the new department. One of the Fire Chief’s primary duties prior to the standup of the department is to complete a needs assessment for the city of Orono’s emergency service needs. At the February 13, 2023 meeting council directed staff to complete a needs assessment by June 12th. Over the past several months Staff in consultation with the Fire Negotiation Committee prepared the Needs Assessment. Staff reviewed the draft needs assessment with the City Council at tonight’s work session. A copy of the Needs Assessment is at Exhibits A. 3. Time Line: In order to meet key deadlines from the most time sensitive course of action the study must be complete and direction received by end of month June. When What Who May 8, 2023 Work Session Review of the Draft report with City Council Fire Chief May 8, 2023 Council Meeting Establish Needs Assessment community input Process City Council May 9-18, 2023 Written questions on the Draft Needs Assessment via City Website Community Members May 22, 2023 Fire Needs Assessment Presentation and questions from residents Fire Chief City Council May 22-7 June, 2023 Written Comments via City Website Community Members June 12, 2023 Final Report and Presentation to City Council Guidance on way forward Fire Chief City Council 4. Community Input Process. In order to provide an open and orderly process for the community input on the Fire Needs Assessment. the Negotiating committee recommends the following process: a. Staff will establish a comment form on the city website to facilitate written comments and questions. b. Comments and questions received by close of business on May 18th will be included in the Council packet for the May 22nd Meeting. c. At the May 22nd Council meeting Orono residents will be given the opportunity to provide in person input to the City Council. 1) The Mayor will establish a time limit for the comment period. Recommend 1 hour. 2) Staff will prepare a Fire Needs assessment public comment form (Exhibit B). Resident’s wishing to speak at the council meeting will fill out the form prior to the meeting. The mayor will then use the forms to call up residents. The intent of the form is to provide for an orderly process. d. The written comment form will be available on the City Website until Close of Business June 7th Item No.: 23 Date: May 8, 2023 Item Description: Fire Department Needs Assessment Presenter: James VanEyll Fire Chief Agenda Section: Fire Department Report for any additional public input. This input will be provided as part of the council packet for June 12. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends proceeding with a Fire Department Needs Assessment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A. Provide initial direction and ask question on the draft Needs Analysis. B. Motion to adopt timeline at Paragraph 3 and public process at paragraph 4 for the Fire Needs Assessment. Exhibits A. Draft Needs Assessment B. Example Public Comment Form James VanEyll CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway ORONO FIRE NEEDS ASSESSMENT Orono Fire Needs Assessment 1 | Page Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Response Guidelines ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Facilities, Apparatus and Equipment ............................................................................................ 5 1.3 Staffing .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 History of Fire Service in Orono ........................................................................................................ 7 3.0 Evaluation of Current Conditions .................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Organizational Overview ............................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Service Area and Infrastructure .......................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Budgets and Finance ........................................................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Emergency Response Type and Frequency ......................................................................... 14 3.2 Management Components ......................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Foundational Management Elements................................................................................. 16 3.2.2 Management Documents and Processes ............................................................................ 16 3.2.3 Record Keeping and Documentation .................................................................................. 16 3.3 Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Programs .................................................................... 17 3.3.1 Facilities ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Apparatus ............................................................................................................................ 21 3.4 Staffing ........................................................................................................................................ 22 3.4.1 Emergency Response Staffing ............................................................................................. 23 3.4.2 Personnel Policies and Processes........................................................................................ 26 3.4.3 Relief Association ................................................................................................................ 27 3.5 Fire and EMS Training Delivery ................................................................................................... 27 3.5.1 General Training Competencies .......................................................................................... 27 3.5.2 Training Program Management and Administration .......................................................... 27 3.6 Service Delivery and Performance .............................................................................................. 28 3.6.1 Service Demand .................................................................................................................. 28 3.6.2 Resource Distribution ......................................................................................................... 33 3.6.3 Response Performance ....................................................................................................... 36 3.6.4 Mutual/Automatic Aid Systems .......................................................................................... 39 3.6.5 Community Risk Reduction ................................................................................................. 40 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 2 | Page 3.6.6 Fire and Life Safety Education ............................................................................................. 41 3.6.7 Fire and Life Safety Code Enforcement ............................................................................... 41 3.6.8 Fire Cause and Origin Investigation .................................................................................... 41 4.0 Community Risk Factors .................................................................................................................. 42 4.1 Population Growth and Demographics....................................................................................... 42 4.2 Community Risk Analysis ............................................................................................................ 43 5.0 Future Service Delivery ................................................................................................................... 46 5.1 Central Station Model ................................................................................................................. 46 5.2 Multiple Station Model ............................................................................................................... 46 5.3 Future Staffing ............................................................................................................................ 46 5.3.1 Career Fire Department ...................................................................................................... 46 5.3.2 Combination Fire Department ............................................................................................ 47 5.3.3 Duty Crew Fire Department ................................................................................................ 47 5.3.4 Paid-On-Call (POC) Fire Department ................................................................................... 48 5.4 Thresholds & Triggers – Determining When to Change the Staffing Model .............................. 48 6.0 Courses of Actions (COAs) ............................................................................................................... 50 6.1 COA 1: Orono Assumes Control of Existing LLFD ........................................................................ 50 6.2 COA 2: Taxable Fire District/Joint Powers Agreement ............................................................... 51 6.3 Course of Action (COA) 3: Orono Municipal Fire Department with POC Firefighters ................ 52 6.4 COA 4: Orono Municipal Fire Department with Duty Crews and FTEs ....................................... 52 7.0 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 54 7.0.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 54 7.0.2 Facility ................................................................................................................................. 55 7.0.3 Apparatus and Equipment .................................................................................................. 55 7.0.4 Miscellaneous ..................................................................................................................... 55 7.1 Recommendations for 2023........................................................................................................ 56 7.1.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 56 7.1.2 Facility ................................................................................................................................. 57 7.1.3 Apparatus & Equipment ...................................................................................................... 57 7.1.4 Miscellaneous ..................................................................................................................... 59 7.2 Recommendations for 2024........................................................................................................ 59 7.2.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 60 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 3 | Page 7.2.2 Facility ................................................................................................................................. 60 7.2.3 Apparatus & Equipment ...................................................................................................... 60 7.2.4 Miscellaneous ..................................................................................................................... 61 7.3 Recommendations for 2025........................................................................................................ 62 7.3.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 62 7.3.2 Apparatus & Equipment ...................................................................................................... 62 7.4 Recommendations for 2026 and beyond ................................................................................... 63 7.4.1 Facility ................................................................................................................................. 63 Annex A – Heat Maps .................................................................................................................................. 64 Annex B – Orono Fire Capital Plan .............................................................................................................. 68 Annex C – Orono Fire Organizational Chart ................................................................................................ 69 Annex D – Timeline ..................................................................................................................................... 70 Annex E – Management Component Charts .............................................................................................. 72 Annex F – Equipment Standards ................................................................................................................. 76 Annex G – Emergency Response Staffing Charts ........................................................................................ 77 Annex H – Firefighter Health and Safety Information ................................................................................ 79 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 4 | Page 1.0 Executive Summary This needs analysis was compiled by the Orono Fire chief with assistance from the rest of the Orono staff and in consultation with the Orono Fire Negotiating Committee. The purpose of the analysis is to establish the future needs of Fire and Emergency Services for Orono residents and review various means of meeting those needs. This report provides analysis on the current state of Fire and Emergency Services in Orono and looks at how the city should prepare for the future. Staff recommends the establishment of an Orono Fire Department based on the following: • Establishment of a Suburban Response Standard • An organizational structure consisting of a combination of full time, duty crew and paid on call firefighters • A capital investment plan with sufficient funding to meet National Fire Protection (NFPA) guidelines within 10 years and then maintain the fleet and facilities into the future. • Establish contracts with partner cities to provide them service were mutually beneficial but using a cost distribution model that is equitable. The review of the current system identifies issues with systemic underfunding of capital and staffing deficiencies. The revenues set aside for capital investment have not kept pace with inflation. Due to this lack of funding, the department finds itself with an aging fleet and facilities that need many updates but no funding for either. Staffing has not kept pace with demand nor the expectations of the cities and citizens. 1.1 Response Guidelines The first item Orono should address is establishment of response guidelines. Staff recommends that Orono Fire strive to achieve the Suburban Area Demand Zone, per NFPA 17201 or better, per NFPA 17102 if staffing stations. By adopting a response guideline, staff can better recommend staffing models that will meet and or exceed the guideline. Currently, there are no formally adopted response guidelines. 1 NFPA 1720: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations and Special Operations to the Public by Volunteer Fire Departments; NFPA 2 NFPA 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments; NFPA Orono Fire Needs Assessment 5 | Page 1.2 Facilities, Apparatus and Equipment There are many additions and changes to the facilities and equipment that need to happen so that the department can meet current and future needs. As we build the Orono Fire Department, we want it to be a model fire department for the area, that follows best practices, state and national standards. Staff recommends that the Orono Fire Department continue with the two-station model. This model requires a front out rescue pumper at each station and one reserve rescue pumper. The front out rescue pumper should be less than 15 years old and the reserve less than 25 per NFPA 19013. We should have a ladder truck at the central/main station and a combination brush/medical response utility at each station. A tanker/tender at each station is a requirement due to a large response area where there is no municipal water supply within the City of Orono. One of these tanker/tenders could be shared use with the Orono Public Works Department. The department should have two fire boats. One needs to be docked on Lake Minnetonka for the summer and the other available to respond to smaller bodies of water, such as Long Lake. A fire/medical response 6x6 or UTV is required to respond to areas where our brush/medical utility isn’t able to respond i.e., trails, wooded areas, marshes. Staff recommends that both 20-year-old engines be replaced with new rescue pumpers or used if they meet our specifications. A ladder truck was purchased by Orono and needs to be equipped and refurbished, which is currently in process. Staff recommends 2 new combination brush/medical utility trucks be purchased, one for each station. Staff recommends that a facilities study be commissioned. This facilities study can review both fire stations and recommend the imminent maintenance and upgrades to the latest standards. Both fire stations are at or over the 20-year mark and in need of multiple updates and maintenance. 1.3 Staffing The greatest resource of the fire department is a well-trained and dedicated firefighter. The Orono Fire Department has a good call volume and has experienced an increase in call volume over the last few years. Recruiting and retaining POC firefighters has become increasingly difficult. This mirrors state, regional and national trends. Fire service analysts agree that the reason for this difficulty is due to demographics, culture, as well as the increased training and response demands on a firefighter. The Department could use a phased in approach of 4 Paid- On-Call (POC) or parti-time firefighters for a daytime duty crew. This would satisfy the issue of daytime response as we move towards our near-term goal of a full-time fire inspector and firefighter tech/admin. Both of these positions would respond to day time calls. The Duty Crew staffing model could look like the following: 4 duty crew firefighters would handle the majority of the calls for service during the week from 0600 – 1800 hours. 45% of our calls for the last 9 years occurred between 0600 – 1800 hours during the week even though this only accounts for 3 NFPA 1901 Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus; NFPA Orono Fire Needs Assessment 6 | Page 36% of the hours in a week. In the near future modifications could be made at each fire station for crew and day rooms, the program should be expanded to 24 hour 7 days per week model, so that our response standards are met 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The recommendation is based on the City or Orono adopting a performance guideline of Suburban or better. These changes help our POC firefighters respond better and have less stress on their bodies when the pager goes into alert mode. It also allows the firefighters to schedule their time to be on call and not at the mercy of when calls occur. The biggest benefit of this staffing model is our citizens we serve. They will see an improved response performance. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 7 | Page 2.0 History of Fire Service in Orono Orono has contracted for fire service either formally or informally since being an independent town in 1889. The City was incorporated in 1955 and the first formal fire contracts were developed and implemented in the 1960s. Orono has utilized up to 4 fire departments to supply coverage to the City of Orono and they were Maple Plain, Wayzata, Long Lake, Mound and Excelsior. Each of these departments are over 90 years old. Orono commissioned a fire response study in 1980. See Map 2 for a service boundary from the 1960s to the 1980 study. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 8 | Page It was recommended that the boundaries between Long Lake and Wayzata change, see Map 7. Long Lake was able to respond quicker to some of the areas Wayzata Fire was covering due to Long Lake’s new fire station. Also, the study suggested that Orono construct a fire station in the Navarre Area of Orono to improve response times. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 9 | Page The above map was the boundaries for each fire service area until the 2002 contract. In 2002, Orono, Medina and Long Lake entered into a long-term contract for fire service. Orono and Long Lake created a new fire station 1 with joint ownership between them. Orono consolidated down the Maple Plain Fire response area into the Long Lake’s response area. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 10 | Page Orono built fire station 2 in 2004 and added it to the long-term contract in 2007. Excelsior Fire opened and operated fire station two due to issues with leadership at Long Lake Fire with their paid-on-call fire chiefs. James Van Eyll was hired as the first full-time fire chief due to these leadership issues. Over the next 15-years, the City of Orono consolidated down their fire service area to just to the Long Lake Fire Department. In 2017, Orono expressed their interest in switching roles with City of Long Lake. Orono and Long Lake have been in negotiations since then. Orono hired a fire chief in December of 2022 and their initial task was a needs assessment of fire and emergency for Orono. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 11 | Page 3.0 Evaluation of Current Conditions 3.1 Organizational Overview The Organizational Overview provides a summary of the current delivery of Fire and EMS Services to the City of Orono. The data was gathered from the information submitted to the Minnesota State Fire Marshall’s Office by the Long Lake Fire Department. Fire and emergency medical services are provided by the Long Lake Fire Department through a contract for service with the City of Long Lake. The following map shows the coverage area for the Long Lake Fire Department, which also provides services to the Cities of Long Lake, Medina and Minnetonka Beach. 3.1.1 Service Area and Infrastructure Orono Fire Needs Assessment 12 | Page The service area consists of 33 approximate square miles of that the City of Orono is 23.98 square miles or 72.67% of the service area. Orono is 15.92 square miles if you remove the lakes. The Long Lake Fire Department serves a population of 11,301 of that the City of Orono population served is 8,315 or 73.58% of the population. Following is a summary of the Long Lake Fire Department’s service areas and service delivery infrastructure. Long Lake Fire Department Agency Type Municipal fire department with Full- time Chief and paid-on- call (POC) firefighters Area, Sq Miles +/-33 Headquarters 340 Willow Drive N Orono, MN Fire Stations 2 Population Served 11,301 Service Delivery Infrastructure Emergency Vehicles Engines 2 Engine, reserve 1 Utility/Brush 3 Water Tender 2 Light Rescue 1 Heavy Rescue 1 Boat 2 Command 2 The area served by the Long Lake Fire Department includes the City of Orono, a portion of Medina and City of Minnetonka Beach. 3.1.2 Budgets and Finance Property taxes are the primary source of funding for emergency services. Other funding sources include state and federal grants, rental income, fee for service, fundraisers, donation, Orono Fire Needs Assessment 13 | Page etc. This funding is used to purchase the necessary equipment to fulfill the mission and run the day-to-day operations. In the current economic situation, fire departments are seeing increasing expenditures and a disruption in the supply chain has increased lead times for equipment and apparatus. This has led to a difficulty to maintain the current delivery of service to the community, which has led to the request for more funding to adequately supply the expected levels of services. The following is a summary of the Long Lake Fire Department’s revenues, budgeted expenditures and capital for 2023. Long Lake Fire Department Municipality Orono Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach* Other** Totals 2023 Fire Revenue $ 543,963 $ 64,054 $ 33,775 $ 58,680 $ 8,648 $ 709,120 2023 Fire Expenditures $ 543,963 $ 64,054 $ 33,775 $ 32,610 $ 8,648 $ 683,050 2023 Capital Allocation $ 87,302.80 $ 10,279.40 $ 5,417.80 $ - $ - $ 103,000 Totals $ 631,265.80 $ 74,333.40 $ 39,192.80 $ 58,680.00 $ 8,648.00 *Minnetonka Beach has a separate contract for service **Other revenue listed is from Minnesota Board of Firefighter Training and Education (MBFTE) and rental income The City of Orono cost for fire protection is below state and national rates. Please see the graph below. These numbers for Minnesota and the National Rates are from a study done by the Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 14 | Page * A Kare 11 News report from 2019 shows that Minnesota is 48th out of the 50 states in spending on the fire service. This doesn’t simple state that the City of Orono or the others are underpaying for fire protection. This comparison is one of several factors to review. Another is the level of service provided to the community and the community’s satisfaction with the level of service along with adequate facilities and apparatus. Improving the level of service and correcting the underfunded capital will create additional funding needs that could result in higher tax rates to support the system. Minnesota usually is in the bottom 10% national in spending on the fire service. As a comparison from fiscal year 2020, Minnesota ranks 20th in K-12 education spending, 16th for parks and 11th for police. 3.1.3 Emergency Response Type and Frequency The Long Lake Fire Department responds to many different calls for service each year. Most of the incidents are medicals and alarms. Below is the breakdown for the past five years of calls for the Long Lake Fire Department. 431 calls in 2022 is the most since 2011 when LLFD responded to 432 calls. $469.00 $268.00 $205.42 $103.10 $275.49 $156.77 $- $50.00 $100.00 $150.00 $200.00 $250.00 $300.00 $350.00 $400.00 $450.00 $500.00 National Minnesota*Orono Long Lake Minnetonka Beach Medina Comparision of Cost for Fire Protection per Household Orono Fire Needs Assessment 15 | Page Incident Type 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 100 Fire 29 28 30 24 31 200 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat (no fire) 2 0 1 0 0 300 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 136 120 93 123 120 400 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 62 57 41 65 72 500 Service Call 11 22 21 19 18 600 Good Intent Call 103 85 88 100 99 700 False Alarm & False Call 88 86 88 83 74 800 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 2 2 1 0 900 Special Incident Type 0 0 0 0 0 Total Incident Count 431 400 364 415 414 Below is a breakdown for the past five years of calls that occurred in the City of Orono. Incident Type 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 100 Fire 17 13 15 12 13 200 Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat (no fire) 2 0 1 0 0 300 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 95 82 66 83 86 400 Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 48 43 37 42 64 500 Service Call 5 16 14 14 17 600 Good Intent Call 79 64 68 73 88 700 False Alarm & False Call 65 65 67 55 59 800 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 2 2 1 0 900 Special Incident Type 0 0 0 0 0 Total Incident Count 311 285 270 280 327 % of Total LLFD Calls 72% 71% 74% 67% 79% Orono Fire Needs Assessment 16 | Page 3.2 Management Components The common challenge for fire service leaders is effective fire department management. Today’s fire department must address management complexities that include effective organizational structure, volunteer or paid-on-call personnel (POC), adequate response, maintenance of competencies and a qualified workforce. The effective management of the fire department needs to be based on a number of components. The fire department should start with the organization’s mission, vision and values which should align with the City’s. A mission statement expresses the core reason for an agency’s existence. A vision statement expresses where the organization wants to go in the near-term future. The values express how the members of the organization are going to treat each other on the journey to achieve the vision. These three core elements are all contained in a strategic plan. A strategic plan is typically a five-year work plan for the organization with goals and objectives. As Fire Chief of the Long Lake Fire Department, I created all of the above management components. 3.2.1 Foundational Management Elements The next steps are the essential foundational elements such as rules, regulations, standard operating procedures or guidelines along with department policies and operational documents. Then the development of internal and external communication practices and recordkeeping are implemented and maintained. These foundational elements allow an organization to move forward in an organized and effective manner. As Fire Chief of the Long Lake Fire Department, I developed and implemented all foundational management elements. 3.2.2 Management Documents and Processes To be an effective organization, a department should establish the appropriate documentation, policies, procedures and guidelines. Processes must also be established to address the flow of information and communication within the fire department as well as with the citizens it serves. As Fire Chief for the Long Lake Fire Department, I established new and improved policies, procedures and guidelines. Also, I created processes to establish the flow of communication and information within the department. 3.2.3 Record Keeping and Documentation Accurate record keeping is a must for any organization. As Fire Chief for the Long Lake Fire Department, I updated and improved all record keeping and documentation. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 17 | Page 3.3 Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Programs Three basic resources are required to successfully carry out the mission of the fire department. They are trained personnel, facilities and firefighting equipment/apparatus. It is impossible for the fire department to deliver services effectively without the appropriate capital equipment and funding to plan and maintain it. 3.3.1 Facilities Fire facilities or stations play an integral role in the delivery of emergency services for a number of reasons. The station’s location will dictate, to a large degree, response time to emergencies. Longer response times can mean the difference between confining a fire to a single room and losing the structure or survival from sudden illness or injury. Fire stations also need to be designed to house sufficient personnel, equipment and apparatus; as well as meet other needs of the organization and its personnel. Consideration should be given to a fire station’s ability to support the department’s mission as it exists today and how it will exist in the future. One needs to examine the activities that take place within a fire station to ensure the structure is adequate now and plan for the future. Examples of these may include: • The housing and cleaning for apparatus and equipment • Decontamination areas for firefighters and PPE • Residential living and sleeping space for on-duty personnel • Administrative and management offices with adequate technology • Training and classroom areas • Firefighter fitness and recovery areas • Emergency Operations Center The City of Long Lake operates the fire department out of 2 fire stations. The Willow Drive Fire Station serves the northern portion of the service area and is located at 340 Willow Drive North in Orono. The Navarre Fire Station, located at 3770 Shoreline Drive Orono serves the southern portion of the service area. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 18 | Page Willow Drive Fire Station is one of two fire stations operated by the Long Lake Fire Department. It houses the administrative offices and serves as the main fire station. The facility includes 6 double pass-through bays along with offices and a medium sized training room. It does have showers, a small, separate locker room for each gender, a kitchen and workout room. It is co- owned by Orono and Long Lake. There are no 24-hour crew quarters at the station, nor is there room to add them without a major remodel. It is currently not set up for the best practices of carcinogen containment nor does it have an exhaust removal system. The roof is in need of replacement due to constant leaks that have been patched. It is in need of a technology upgrade for improved Wi-Fi coverage, a station alerting system and improved communication speakers throughout. Orono and Long Lake share ownership of this building. Willow Drive Fire Station Physical Address 340 Willow Drive North Date of Construction 2003 Auxiliary Power Generator, Diesel Condition Fair Special Considerations Adequate storage, ADA Accessible, Dual Gender Appropriate. Square Footage 19,000 Facilities Available Exercise/Workout Yes, separate room with good equipment Kitchen Yes, adjacent to lounge area Crew Quarters No crew rooms Lockers/Showers Yes, but not enough for staff Training/Meetings Yes Orono Fire Needs Assessment 19 | Page Technology Yes, but needs updates Washer/Dryer No washer but a dryer Gear Extractor/Dryer Yes, but extractor is 20 years old Safety and Security Sprinkler System Yes Smoke Detection Yes Security Yes Apparatus Exhaust System No Units/Staffing Levels Assigned Apparatus list follows. All units staffed via Paid-On-Call firefighters The Navarre Fire Station is the second of two fire stations operated by the Long Lake Fire Department. The station consists of 2 double-depth apparatus bays along with two offices and a small training room. There are no 24-hour crew quarters, nor is there room to put them in without a major remodel. This smaller station doesn’t have a locker room. It also lacks an exercise room, although the firefighters turned the lounge area into a workout area with donated equipment. The Navarre Fire Station does have issues with the HVAC on a regular basis. It is currently not set up for the best practices of carcinogen containment nor does it have an exhaust removal system. It is in need of a technology upgrade for improved Wi-Fi & radio coverage, a station alerting system and improved communication speakers throughout. Orono owns the building outright but contracts with the City of Long Lake to operate and maintain it. Navarre Fire Station Physical Address 3770 Shoreline Drive Date of Construction 2003 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 20 | Page Auxiliary Power Generator, Natural Gas Condition Fair Special Considerations Adequate storage, ADA Accessible, Dual Gender Appropriate. Square Footage 6,900 Facilities Available Exercise/Workout Yes, in lounge room Kitchen Yes, adjacent to exercise area Crew Quarters No crew rooms Lockers/Showers Yes, but not enough for staff Training/Meetings Yes, but small Technology Yes, but needs updates Washer/Dryer No washer but a dryer Gear Extractor/Dryer Yes, but extractor is 20 years old Safety and Security Sprinkler System Yes Smoke Detection Yes Security Yes, no cameras Apparatus Exhaust System No Units/Staffing Levels Assigned Apparatus list follows. All units staffed via Paid-On-Call firefighters Firefighters are at a significantly higher risk than the general population to develop cancer (21% higher colon cancer risk, 39% higher skin cancer risk, 102% higher testicular cancer risk, etc.)4. This risk is a direct result of their firefighting activities – they are frequently exposed to highly toxic and carcinogenic compounds at the fire scene, and they bring those compounds back to the fire station on every hose, ladder, fire truck and piece of personal protective equipment that was anywhere near the fire. In addition, operating diesel fire trucks inside the fire station has resulted in massive amounts of diesel particulates permeating the apparatus bay (one large study showed a typical apparatus bay has concentrations 16 times above EPA Standards). While Long Lake Fire has made every effort to not allow the diesel trucks to idle inside the bays, just starting and moving them results in large amounts of particulates released into the air. Both the fireground toxins and the diesel particulates are so small that they hang suspended in the air for long periods of time, so the risk does not go away between calls but rather is consistent every time the apparatus bay is entered. Apparatus Bays are not a safe place to work, not a safe place to store equipment and supplies, and not a safe place to walk through to gain access to adjoining spaces. Any adjoining space that is not properly protected through air 4 Taking Action Against Cancer in the Fire Service, www.firefightercancersupport.org Orono Fire Needs Assessment 21 | Page pressure differentials and air locks also becomes contaminated. The increase risk of cancer becomes a major factor in evaluating the functionality of a fire station. 3.3.2 Apparatus Fire apparatus and boats are unique and expensive pieces of equipment customized to operate for our community and defined mission. Apparatus must be reliable to transport firefighters and equipment rapidly and safely to an incident scene. Such vehicles must be properly equipped and function appropriately to ensure that the delivery of service is not compromised. For this reason, they are very expensive and have longer lead times. They also offer little flexibility in use and reassignment to other missions. The vehicles listed below are well maintained but in varying degrees of condition. Long range capital planning is a challenge in today’s economy. Pricing and lead times have increased significantly. The larger problem is the limited funding for capital purchases in the current contact. *Non-complaint with NFPA Standards Due a lack of capital funding, the current fleet is aged and some vehicles are at or near their end of life according to NFPA. Annex D of NFPA 19015 includes life cycle recommendations regarding frontline and reserve apparatus. The standard recommends that apparatus should provide 15 years of frontline service and then be turned over for reserve status. The annex further recommends that apparatus that are more than 25 years old be retired from the vehicle 5 NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus; NFPA Apparatus Number Type Year Life Expectancy Make and Model Condition Pump Capacity Tank Capacity Ownership B11 Boat 2004 Lake Assault Good 1000 N/A Long Lake/Donated B12 Boat 2020 Zodiac Pro 5.5 Excellent Portable N/A Long Lake/Donated CMD Command 2022 7/100K Chev Tahoe Excellent N/A N/A Orono - 100% Cmd1 Command 2013 7/100K Chev Tahoe Fair N/A N/A Orono - 82.73% Cmd2 Command 2022 7/100K Chev Tahoe Excellent N/A N/A Orono - 84.96% E11*Engine 2004 20 Kenworth/Pierce Poor 1250 1000 Orono - 74.68% E21*Engine 2003 20 International/Pierce Fair 1250 1000 Orono - 100% E22 Engine 2017 20 Spartan/Toyne Excellent 1500 1000 Orono - 83.02% L1 Ladder 2012 25 Pierce Good 2000 400 Orono - 100% R12 Heavy Rescue 2003 10 Sterling Good N/A N/A Orono - 76.07% R21 Light Rescue 2003 10 Ford 550 Good N/A N/A Orono - 100% T11 Tender 2009 25 Freightliner Excellent N/A 3500 Orono - 84.15% T12 Tender 2001 25 Sterling Fair N/A 2000 Orono - 72.38% U11*Grass/Medical 1998 10 Ford F350 Fair 190 200 Orono - 71.05% U12 Grass 2015 10 Polaris Ranger Good 70 70 Long Lake/Donated U21*Grass/Medical 2000 10 Ford F250 Good Unknown 75 Long Lake/Donated Long Lake Fire Department Orono Fire Needs Assessment 22 | Page fleet. Reviewing the above fleet, the fire department should have 2 frontline engines and one reserve. Currently one apparatus is at the 25-year mark and in need of replacement. There will need to be a significant investment in the fleet over the next 5 to 10 years regardless of who is operating the fire department. This investment may need to be sooner due to the ever- lengthening lead times for fire equipment, PPE and apparatus. Common life expectancy for types of apparatus are as follows; Engine/Pumper 20 years, Ladder 25 years, Tanker/Tenders 25 years, Rescue 10 years, Utility 10 years, Staff 7 years or if a vehicle is over 100,000 miles. 3.4 Staffing LLFD is made up of a full-time fire chief and paid on call firefighters. Combination departments consider administrative personnel as primary daytime responders. LLFD is organized and resourced to have 50 paid on call firefighters. At the end of 2022, LLFD had a total of 42 paid on call firefighters split between the two stations for their operational and administrative staff. The most valuable asset for the fire department is our personnel. The United States depend on 1.1 million firefighters, of those approximately 812,000 are volunteer/paid on call (POC). The US reached a low of volunteer firefighters in 2011. There has been a slow increase since then but the growth isn’t enough to meet the steady increase in call volume. Managing POC personnel to achieve maximum efficiency, professionalism and personal satisfaction is as easy as full-time personnel. Consistency, fairness, safety and opportunities for personal and professional growth are key values in a healthy management culture. These values are important when the organization relies on the participation and support of a “volunteer” workforce. POC personnel will leave if they don’t feel valued and/or experience personal satisfaction from their participation. Several national organizations recommend standards to address staffing issues. The Occupational Health & Safety Administration (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1710 or 1720 are frequently cited as authoritative documents. 6 7 8 In addition, the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) publishes benchmarks for the number of personnel recommended on the emergency scene for various levels of risk. Currently, there are no formal adopted standards but LLFD is achieving the Rural Area Demand Zone. Adopting formal guidelines for response standard is critical for a modern fire 6 Respiratory Protection Standard 29 CFR 1910.134; Occupational Health & Safety Administration. 7 NFPA 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, to the Public by Career Fire Departments; NFPA. 8 NFPA 1720: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations and Special Operations to the Public by Volunteer Fire Departments; NFPA. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 23 | Page department. Orono falls within the Suburban Area Demand Zone and Long Lake falls withing the Urban Area Demand Zone. Demand Zone Demographics Pop per Sq Mi Minimum Staff to Respond Response Time (minutes) Meets Objective (%) Urban Area >1000 15 9 90 Suburban Area 500 - 1000 10 10 80 Rural Area <500 6 14 80 Remote Area Travel Distance >= 8 mi 4 Directly dependent on travel distance 90 Special Risks Determined by AHJ Determined by AHJ based on risk Determined by AHJ 90 3.4.1 Emergency Response Staffing Staffing levels are set by the worst case and most personnel intensive emergency response. In order to mitigate incidents, you need properly trained staff of emergency responders with the proper equipment and apparatus to respond. Insufficient staffing increases the risk of injury to all involved with the incident and will decrease the effectiveness of the response. Responding to a fire incident, the department needs 15 to 16 responders in various roles on the scene to make an interior attack. The 15 to 16 responders all have specific roles to play on the incident scene and should be paged in the first alarm. Please see the illustration below for a breakdown of the roles. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 24 | Page The first 5 minutes of an incident will dictate how the next 5 hours will go, so it is imperative to set up incident command (IC) within the initial minutes of the incident. That IC can be the first arriving officer with the engine or the Chief/Duty Officer responding in the command vehicle. The most crucial period for fire suppression is the first 15 minutes. If the crews are not able to put water on the fire and establish an uninterrupted supply of water, then it is less likely to achieve the desired results. Please see the Fire Propagation Curve below. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 25 | Page The general concept of the first 15 minutes can be applied to other incident types such as rescue and medicals. Critical tasks must be conducted in a timely and orderly manner in order to bring calm to the chaos. The fire chief is ultimately responsible for assuring that responding companies/firefighters are capable of performing the tasks assigned to them in a prompt, efficient and safely. Staffing for an auto crash with extrication would be 13 responders, while staffing for an EMS incident would only be 4. Please see Annex G for the breakdown of their roles. Another way to see how many firefighters are needed is to review the national and regional rates of firefighters per 1,000 people. The Long Lake Fire Department falls within the regional and is above the national median. The graph below illustrates this This comparison doesn’t necessarily translate into the ability to generate sufficient personnel for incident response. It is not surprising that the region and LLFD are above the national median. The upper Midwest has the highest amount of volunteer or paid on call firefighters. The following graph shows LLFD’s ability to generate its own personnel for each type of call on average for the past 9 years. 3.23 3.98 3.82 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 National Median Regional Median Long Lake Fire Median Rates of Firefighters per 1,000 People Orono Fire Needs Assessment 26 | Page To do an interior attack on the fire a fire department should have 15 - 16 firefighters on scene but for the other types of calls you need less. The City of Long Lake pages each station on weekdays from 0600 – 1800 hours to assure an adequate response of personnel for the calls for service, especially at Station 2. This leads to inefficiencies as shown in the graph above. Medicals, over the last 9 years make up 35% of all calls to Orono and Alarms are 36%. Fire calls only make up 10% of the total calls over the same time period. Station 2 daytime response performance is masked by paging both stations for day time calls. Station 2 over the last few years averages less than 4 firefighters per Orono daytime calls. Station 2 produces less than 2 firefighters for daytime calls 10% of the time. Their average turnout time is 7:45 and the average on scene time is 13:08 as compared to the overall average turnout time of 6:10 and average on scene time is 10:51 3.4.2 Personnel Policies and Processes The Long Lake Fire Department has a contemporary personnel policy manual. They provide training on these policies to the firefighters. LLFD uses Lexipol® web-based policy management service since the City of Long Lake’s policy manual is outdated. Recruiting, selecting and retaining firefighters takes considerable investment of time, effort and money to ensure high quality employees work in the organization. Gone are the days of hiring anyone who walks through the front door. Selecting the best candidates that fit within the department and its culture requires deliberate and comprehensive evaluation. It has been a challenge to recruit and retain firefighters the past few years at LLFD. 14.50 13.28 11.01 10.90 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 Fire Medical Alarm Other 9 Year Average of Firefighters per Type of Incident Orono Fire Needs Assessment 27 | Page 3.4.3 Relief Association The Long Lake Fire Department Relief Association manages the pension fund which is invested with the State Board of Investment. The lump sum benefit level is $7,000 per year of service as of 1/1/2022. The vesting schedule is 60% at 10-years and 100% at 20-years. The benefit level is funded by the rates of return on investments and fire state aid. In my 15-years as Fire Chief at Long Lake, the cities didn’t contribute any extra funds for the firefighter’s pension. Orono makes up approximately 2/3 of the fire state aid. 3.5 Fire and EMS Training Delivery Training and education of personnel are critical functions for a fire department. Emergency personnel are at risk and emergency outcomes are compromised without quality and comprehensive training programs. Initial, ongoing, and high-quality training and education is critical for a fire department effectiveness and the safety of its personnel. The training of the newly hired firefighter requires a structured recruit training and testing process. Once the initial training is complete, personnel need to be actively engaged on a regular basis to ensure skills and knowledge are maintained. Training programs must go beyond simply fulfilling mandatory hours. Emergency services training officers must ensure that firefighters are not only competent, but also self-confident in the variety of skills necessary to perform effectively. Firefighting and EMS skills and knowledge are perishable. This is why it is important to have a good instructor or two within the organization. Or have access to resources and funds to bring in outside experts. The training should be set up in a way that if follows a prescribed lesson plan that meets specific objectives. 3.5.1 General Training Competencies Training must be based on standards to be effective. In Minnesota, the fire standards are established through the Minnesota Board of Firefighter Training and Education (MBFTE) along with the Minnesota State Certification Board. The national fire standards are found in NFPA and the International Fire Service Training Association (IFSTA). Medical standards are established by the National Emergency Medical Services. The Long Lake Fire Department does an excellent job of following and training to the standards. 3.5.2 Training Program Management and Administration A training program needs to be well managed to be effective. The program should include training administration, recordkeeping, training facilities and resources, general training competencies and training methodologies. A paid-on call training officer has their hands full with normal scheduled training and they have little time to address the administrative support and the development of the program guidance such as training planning, goals and defined Orono Fire Needs Assessment 28 | Page objectives. This is where a full-time training officer or contracted company for training would further enhance the program. 3.6 Service Delivery and Performance Response is the most visible part of the emergency service system. When someone calls 911, their expectation is that they receive a quick response by qualified personnel to assist them with their emergency. 3.6.1 Service Demand Service demand is the number of calls for service during a specific period of time, but it is important to understand when and where the demand is coming from for our area. The above data shows overall service demand for the past 10 years for both the City of Orono and the total LLFD incidents for all the contracted cities. As you can see, service demand has been relatively flat over the past 10 years. Orono, over the last 10 years, accounts for 75% of the service demand. Orono has been as low as 67% and as high as 80%. It is helpful to break this demand down by incident type. The breakdown will be in four primary categories; fires, medical responses, fire alarms (alarms) and all other incident types, such as power line issues, public assists, etc. 324 281 319 326 299 327 280 270 285 311 426 353 413 410 383 414 415 364 400 431 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Service Demand Orono Calls LLFD Total Calls Orono Fire Needs Assessment 29 | Page As you can see from the above chart, actual fire calls account for a small percentage of the demand for service that happens in the City of Orono. Medicals and alarms constitute the greatest workload for the firefighters in Orono. It is interesting to see if there are trends by month, day of week or time of day for service demand. As one would expect, June, July and August are the highest months for service demand in Orono. On average for the past 5 years, there are 36 calls for service in July and 29.8 for June and August. 30 39 42 32 32 24 24 27 30 89 98 105 105 116 104 88 111 121 112 127 121 91 105 105 107 103 105 50 55 58 71 74 46 49 43 52 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Service Demand by Type of Call Fires Medicals Alarms Other 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Service Demand by Month 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 30 | Page On average, the higher demand for service in the middle of the week over the past 5 years then either the beginning or the end of the week. 45% of the calls happen Tuesday through Thursday. The service demand by hour of the day shows that calls start to pick up from 0600 – 0700 and peak by midafternoon. Service demand starts to decline after 1800 hours. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Service Demand by Day of Week 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 Service Demand by Hour of Day 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 31 | Page The above graph shows the 9-year average of service demand by hour of the day. The curve closely follows typical population activity patterns. The busiest hour for the past 9 years is 6pm (7.2%) and the slowest is 4am (1.2%). Over the last 9 years, 63% of our calls happened between 0600 – 1800 hours. If we break this down even further and review 0600 – 1800 hours weekday excluding holidays, 45% of our calls happened during this time slot. This time slot makes up only 36% of the hours in a week. This is the toughest time slot to staff a vehicle for response. The graph below shows all calls during the week excluding holidays for the past 9-year average. 5.44 5.00 4.78 3.78 3.67 4.89 6.44 10.00 14.00 16.44 17.8918.67 17.3318.1117.3316.33 18.89 17.33 21.44 17.56 14.3314.00 8.78 7.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 9 Year Avg Service Demand by Hour of Day 3.56 2.89 3.67 2.78 2.78 3.67 5.44 7.56 10.6711.5612.5612.67 11.22 12.7812.4411.33 13.1112.56 15.56 11.44 9.8910.11 6.67 5.22 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 239 Year Average Hour of Day Orono Fire Needs Assessment 32 | Page The next question is where is the highest demand for service within Orono. The following graph plots the incident demand within Orono. The above heat map is for calls for service to the City of Orono for the past 9 years. In Annex A, we have the heat maps for each of the category of calls. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 33 | Page 3.6.2 Resource Distribution Since we know where and when incidents occur in Orono, we can evaluate the deployment of existing resources against historical demand. The map below shows our ability to respond from each station within an assumed four- and 8-minute travel time. The geography and nature of the road network present challenges to the fire department within the City of Orono. It is important to recognize that the maps generated by this process do not account for the time it takes a volunteer to travel to the station among other items. It only provides an indication of the expected duration between pulling out of the station and arriving on scene under normal driving conditions. Insurance Services Office (ISO) requirements must be considered when evaluating distribution of resources. To receive the highest amount of credit with ISO, properties should be within 1.5 miles of a fire engine, 2.5 miles of an aerial apparatus for properties over three stories in height or greater than 25,000 square feet, and within five total miles of a fire station. The map below shows the travel distances of 1.5, 2.5 and 5 miles from each fire station. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 34 | Page The ability of the fire department to arrive on scene of a fire within a given time or distance, represents only part of the ISO classification. Other elements include the ability to assembly personnel, resources and water sufficient to extinguish the fire. The next graph shows the areas that are 1,000 feet from a fire hydrant. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 35 | Page Orono Fire Needs Assessment 36 | Page Those structures outside of a 1,000 feet radius need the fire department to demonstrate a suitable water shuttle operation and transport a sufficient volume of water to a fire for suppression activities within a specified period. 3.6.3 Response Performance Response performance is defined as how fast after a citizen calls 911, a vehicle will arrive to mitigate the problem. It is a measure when the fire apparatus is dispatched to when the first fire department unit arrives on scene. The response time continuum, the time between when the caller dials 911 and when assistance arrives, is comprised of several different components explained below The NFPA standard for call processing is derived from NFPA 1221 9 referenced by NFPA 1710 and provides for communication centers to have alarm time processing of not more than 1- minute (60 seconds), 90 percent of the time for high acuity incidents. NFPA 1710 is a standard for full-time fire firefighters or as defined by AHJ for staffed stations. 9 NFPA 1221: Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems; NFPA. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 37 | Page NFPA 1710 Standards for Fire/EMS Responses Response Interval NFPA Standard Alarm Processing (NFPA 1221) 1-minute or less 90% for High Acuity Calls Turnout Time 1-minute or less at 90% for EMS Incidents, 80-seconds or less at 90% for Fire Travel Time 4-minutes for the first arriving unit The first component of response time continuum is Alarm Processing time in the communications/dispatch center. Hennepin County Communications Center is the dispatch center for the City of Orono. Hennepin County Communications Center average call processing time for the past 5 years is 2:19. The second component of the response time continuum is Turnout Time. Turnout Time is the period that begins when emergency personnel are notified to response and ends once an apparatus begins to respond. Turnout times are dependent on staffing patters and will be longer for volunteer or POC firefighters, especially if the stations are not staffed. This element of response performance is specifically defined in NFPA 1710 for career departments. NFPA 1720, the standard that applies to volunteer or combination departments, doesn’t outline a specific Turnout Time performance recommendation for unstaffed stations as defined by the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). It is still a good exercise to evaluate the department’s ability to get apparatus or units in route. The first graph is the Turnout Time for a command vehicle and the second graph is for an engine or utility. The two lines in the graphs are an average and the 90th percentile. The 90th percentile means that the vehicle turned out 90% of the time below the time listed. So, in the first time of 4:01, the chief or duty officer was in route 90% of the time in 4:01 or less. 0:02:32 0:02:38 0:02:10 0:02:12 0:01:54 0:02:24 0:02:25 0:02:39 0:02:21 0:04:01 0:05:00 0:04:00 0:04:02 0:03:31 0:04:22 0:03:58 0:04:11 0:04:16 0:00:00 0:00:43 0:01:26 0:02:10 0:02:53 0:03:36 0:04:19 0:05:02 0:05:46 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Chief/Duty Officer Average 90th Percentile Orono Fire Needs Assessment 38 | Page The third element is Travel Time. Travel Time is the time from when an apparatus leaves the station to when it arrives on scene. The existing road network, traffic congestion, geographic barriers and the weather all affect travel time performance. NFPA 1720 doesn’t address travel time, it is only in NFPA 1710. The last element and the most important one, is Response Time. This is a combination of Turnout and Travel Time. Response Time is the most common measurement of fire departments response. The graph from NFPA 1720 below shows the target for the classification and the percentile a unit should arrive. Orono falls within the Suburban Area Demand Zone. Demand Zone Demographics Pop per Sq Mi Minimum Staff to Respond Response Time (minutes) Meets Objective (%) Urban Area >1000 15 9 90 Suburban Area 500 - 1000 10 10 80 Rural Area <500 6 14 80 Remote Area Travel Distance >= 8 mi 4 Directly dependent on travel distance 90 Special Risks Determined by AHJ Determined by AHJ based on risk Determined by AHJ 90 0:06:06 0:06:12 0:06:13 0:06:00 0:06:01 0:06:08 0:06:32 0:06:10 0:06:07 0:09:41 0:09:26 0:10:19 0:09:01 0:09:30 0:08:57 0:09:37 0:08:55 0:08:53 0:00:00 0:01:26 0:02:53 0:04:19 0:05:46 0:07:12 0:08:38 0:10:05 0:11:31 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 First Engine or Rescue Avg 90th Orono Fire Needs Assessment 39 | Page The following graph shows LLFD’s response time since 2014. It shows the average, 80th percentile and the 90th percentile. This is for the first unit, which could be a command vehicle with chief or duty officer, an engine or rescue with a crew. The numbers shown above is all emergency response time for LLFD. This includes every call whether it was a code or routine response. LLFD’s response time falls within the Rural Area Demand Zone but not the Suburban Area Demand Zone. Orono falls into the Suburban Area Demand Zone and the City of Long Lake falls within the Urban Demand Zone. The City of Long Lake proposed a trial period of Duty Crews in the summer of 2020 but due to COVID cancelled this plan. 3.6.4 Mutual/Automatic Aid Systems LLFD does participate in Hennepin County’s mutual/automatic aid systems. As Chief of LLFD, I developed the box alarm system for the fire service area. LLFD also participates in the statewide mutual aid system. As Fire Chief, LLFD did deploy to Becker to assist with a massive junk yard fire in February of 2020. Mutual aid is typically employed on an as needed basis where specific units are called for by the incident commander. Automatic aid differs from mutual aid in that units are dispatched as part of the initial response. All aid is predetermined ahead of time and is set up by area of where the incident occurred and what type of call is happening. All mutual aid and automatic aid are agreed upon ahead of time. These agreements facilitate the necessary number of personnel and the appropriate apparatus are responding to the incident. Below is a graph that shows the auto and mutual aid given and received by LLFD over the past 10 years. 0:08:03 0:08:25 0:09:19 0:08:32 0:08:29 0:08:41 0:08:35 0:08:56 0:09:01 0:11:00 0:11:00 0:12:00 0:11:30 0:11:05 0:11:14 0:11:12 0:11:56 0:11:520:12:34 0:13:22 0:14:07 0:13:53 0:13:04 0:12:47 0:12:49 0:13:53 0:13:52 0:00:00 0:02:53 0:05:46 0:08:38 0:11:31 0:14:24 0:17:17 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 First Unit Avg 80th 90th Orono Fire Needs Assessment 40 | Page 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Auto Aid Given 5 6 1 4 3 1 2 4 3 1 Mutual Aid Given 22 10 13 20 13 12 12 12 6 7 Auto Aid Received 12 5 5 3 4 5 4 7 6 7 Mutual Aid Received 5 11 11 4 9 8 8 12 6 5 Mutual and automatic aid operations are an integral part of the response protocol for Hennepin County. Without this system, most departments would not have enough resources to respond properly to larger incidents without putting their personnel into high-risk situations. The best use of mutual and automatic aid is dependent on the departments working well together. Most departments do the following: • Fire ground operations must be conducted in a similar manner and should be based on common Standard Operating Guidelines. Most departments within Hennepin County use BlueCard for managing Type 4 and 5 incidents. BlueCard is a national training program that provides fire departments with a training and certification system that defines the best standard command practices for common, local, everyday strategic and tactical emergency operations conducted on NIMS Type 4 and Type 5 events. • Firefighters must know how to work in concert with personnel from another agency, based on common training programs and procedures. The western area of Hennepin County uses the same fire training agency to initially train the new firefighters. • Dispatch procedures should be in place that clearly define which response types and locations are to receive Automatic Aid response. The box alarm system has been in use within Hennepin County since 2010. • Procedures for the request of and provision of mutual aid should be clearly established in the Mutual Aid Agreement. Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Association has had a Mutual Aid Agreement in place for all departments within Hennepin County since 2003. • Personnel should be fully trained on mutual and automatic aid practices and remain informed on any changes. 3.6.5 Community Risk Reduction An aggressive risk management program, through proactive fire and life safety services, is a fire department’s best opportunity to minimize the losses and human trauma associated with fires and other community risks. “NFPA recommends a multifaceted, coordinated risk reduction process at the community level to address local risks. This requires engaging all segments of Orono Fire Needs Assessment 41 | Page the community, identifying the highest priority risks, and developing and implementing strategies designed to mitigate the risks.”10 A fire department needs to review and understand the importance of fire prevention and public education, appreciating their role in the planning process of a community. Community Risk Reduction Program components are public fire and life safety education, fire code enforcement and fire cause investigation. 3.6.6 Fire and Life Safety Education Providing fire and life safety education to the public to minimize the number of emergencies while training the community to take the appropriate actions when an emergency occurs is essential to a fire and life safety program. These programs provide the best chance for minimizing the effects of fire, injury and illness to the community. Today, public fire and injury prevention education is much more important than in the past. This is the result of evolving community expectations, coupled with the realization by the fire department that community engagement and safety education outreach can build tremendous community support. Currently, the Long Lake Fire Department does very little community fire and life safety education. It is enormous time burden on the POC firefighters. Common best practice is to have members of the fire inspector and duty crew perform this function. 3.6.7 Fire and Life Safety Code Enforcement The most effective way to combat fires is to prevent them. A strong fire prevention program, based on locally identified risks, reduces loss of property, life and the often-crippling impact on a community’s economy. Currently, this enforcement is performed on all new construction and on a complaint basis. There isn’t a program set up to perform annual inspections on commercial and/or rental properties. A routine inspection program is common best practice for a city the size of Orono. 3.6.8 Fire Cause and Origin Investigation An essential element of a community risk reduction program is determining the cause of a fire. By identifying a cause and potential trends enables the department to provide specific public information and fire prevention education to prevent reoccurrence. Currently, fire investigation is handled by a team of investigators from Hennepin County Fire Departments and the State Fire Marshal’s Office. In the past, the Long Lake Fire Department had a firefighter on the Hennepin County Team but it is an enormous time commitment for a POC firefighter. 10 NFPA Standard 1730: Organizing and Deployment of Fire Prevention Inspection and Code Enforcement, Plan Review, Investigation and Public Education Operations, 2019 Edition. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 42 | Page 4.0 Community Risk Factors The best way to project future service demand is to evaluate the population growth and current community risks. These areas along with historical per capita incident rates should allow a more accurate projection of future demand. 4.1 Population Growth and Demographics Emergency service demand is typically driven by population and human activity. As the population of an area rises, so does the overall demand for service. Orono is the 114th largest city in Minnesota. The current growth rate is 1.04% annual and its population has increased 3.17% since the most recent census. Orono has a population density of 522 people per square mile. An NFPA report has identified the groups that face a higher risk of being injured or killed in a fire as:11 • Children under 5 years of age; • Older adults over 65 years of age; • People with disabilities; • People with a language barrier; • People in low-income communities. The graph shows these risk factors for the City of Orono. 12 11 NFPA, 2007; Urban Fire Safety Project, Emmitsburg, MD; retrieved from https://www.nfpa.org/Public- Education/Fire-causes-and-risks/Regional-risks/Urban-areas/Reports-and-presentations 12 Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/orono-mn-population 11% 17% 10% 7%6% % OF ORONO POPULATION Under 5 Over 65 Disabilities Language Barrier Low-income Orono Fire Needs Assessment 43 | Page The City of Orono’s population density falls within the Suburban Area Demand Zone according to NFPA Standard 1720. The following map illustrates the defined population areas of Orono. 4.2 Community Risk Analysis This section analysis the risks that are present and potentially threaten people and property. These risks are identified to assist in planning and response to likely emergencies. The fire service assesses the relative risk of properties based on the following factors, the service area population and population density, the demographics of the population, local land use and development and the geography and natural risks present within the community. These factors affect the number and type of resources (both personnel and apparatus) necessary to mitigate the emergency. Properties with high fire and life risk often require greater number of personnel and apparatus. The following community risk assessment has been developed based on intended land uses as described in the zoning designations for the respective jurisdictions. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 44 | Page Relative Risk Category Zoning Low Risk Areas zoned and used for agricultural purposes, open space and very low-density residential use. Moderate Risk Areas zoned for medium density single family properties, small commercial and office uses, low-intensity retail sales and equivalently sized business activities. High Risk Areas zoned for higher-intensity business districts, mixed use areas, high density residential, industrial, warehousing and large mercantile centers. Weather can be another risk for the community that will play a role in service demand. LLFD has to respond to flooding, winter storms, wind storms and tornados. There are several transportation corridors and various modes of transportation that fall within Orono. Highway 12 along with County Road 15, 19 and 112 that move through Orono. Regardless of the size of the roadway or the speed limit, any roadway has the potential for motor vehicle crashes, vehicle fires, medical emergencies, brush fires or hazardous material spills/leaks. Each of these are not only a risk to our community but the responders are also at risk of being struck by vehicles while operating near moving traffic. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 45 | Page BNSF does have a line that runs through Orono along Highway 12. Although a comparatively safe mode of transport, railway operations do come with hazards similar to the ones that occur along our roadways. Other risks in our area are associated with the building occupancies. The school district, congregate care facilities are the two big ones. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 46 | Page 5.0 Future Service Delivery The future service delivery model could occur with 1 central station or the current 2 station model. Regardless of the number of stations, we should have staff located at the station for response to all incidents. This staff can be a mix of full-time employees, during the day, and part-time or paid-on-call firefighters at other times. 5.1 Central Station Model The advantage of this model is that there is only one station to maintain and you can limit the number of apparatuses in the fleet. In this model, we would need 2 command vehicles, a staff vehicle, 2 rescue pumpers, a tender, a ladder, a brush/medical utility, 2 fire boats, a brush utility UTV and a pick-up truck. This model is less capital intensive but can lead to longer response times. 5.2 Multiple Station Model The advantage of this model is that the stations are located near populations centers and main roadways. The population center is where the majority of our calls occur and the two stations allow for quicker response times. In this model, we would need 2 command vehicles, a staff vehicle, 3 rescue pumpers, 2 tenders, a ladder, 2 brush/medical utility, 2 fire boats, a brush utility UTV and 2 pick-up trucks. 5.3 Future Staffing The Long Lake Fire Department is dependent on the paid-on call model of staffing response. This staffing model has worked well and continues to do so today but we have to look and plan for the future. The paid-on call model is becoming more difficult to recruit and retain responders not only national but locally too. LLFD staffs for a normally expected service demand along with some reserve capacity for multiple or larger incidents. But LLFD, along with most agencies, cannot staff for the major, manpower-intensive incidents that occur on an infrequent basis. It is simply impractical to fully staff for every contingency, which is why automatic and mutual aid is necessary. Decisions on staffing models are best made in conjunction with the level of response performance an organization seeks to accomplish, the community’s expectations and the City’s financial capacity to fund the model. 5.3.1 Career Fire Department A fully staffed model would require a minimum of 6 – 8 on duty personnel (two companies) 24 hours a day. This would require approximately 24 – 32 full-time personnel to cover a 24/7 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 47 | Page operation with an average annual workweek of 50 hours. This is a traditional firefighter work schedule and under Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) a firefighter can work 53 hours per week without overtime. This model would also require a full-time fire chief, fire marshal, training chief and an admin. There are federal grants available to cities which assist with the phase in of the full-time personnel over a 5-year period. Bloomington Fire just recently was awarded one. Alternatively, Orono could start with a single crew available 24/7, which would require 12 – 16 full-time personnel. This would be a financial advantage since most of the calls for service are handled by a single crew. However, it would not be effective for simultaneous incidents and may not be enough for a complicated auto extrication or other calls that require more personnel to safely conduct operations, requiring mutual aid for all of those calls for service. This model would still require a full-time fire chief, fire marshal, training chief and admin. Plymouth Fire recently went to a model similar to this one. 5.3.2 Combination Fire Department This model provides a single-company of career response (12-16 full-time personnel) and utilizes the POC members of the department to supplement the career response for simultaneous incidents and to provide safe numbers of personnel at structure fires and other incidents requiring more personnel. This may be an attractive model because it reduces personnel costs as compared to career departments but allows for a larger effective response. There are complications managing a Combination Department because career and POC staff have differing priorities. Some POC might feel like they don’t get enough calls to make the time they spend training worthwhile. This model is frequently used during a transition between POC and career operation models. It is likely that one station could house both POC and career staff and the other would house just the POC staff. This would still require a full-time chief, fire marshal, training chief and admin. 5.3.3 Duty Crew Fire Department This model assigns POC personnel to take shifts during the day/week so that at least four people are at the stations during peak call times or during times when few personnel are available to respond from the workplace (traditional business hours). Personnel would sign up to cover the shifts they wanted and unclaimed shifts might be covered by firefighters from mutual aid partners as part-time firefighters. The on-duty personnel would be paid a standard hourly rate. The challenge with this approach is finding availability from current personnel because they might need to take time off from their day jobs. This model is most successful where there are many POC firefighters that can spread the shifts among them. There is typically a minimum number of hours of on-duty time per month. An alternative approach to duty crews is to hire part-time firefighters from outside the organization or from mutual aid companies. Typically, these are individuals who may work as Orono Fire Needs Assessment 48 | Page POC firefighters or duty crew firefighters with other fire departments in the area while looking for a job with a career department. By combining several duty crew positions at Cities around the region, they can develop what is effectively a full-time job. There would be some savings on existing POC personnel responding from their home since a single duty crew would handle most routine calls without additional staff. Another approach would be to use the model above for day time duty crews and utilize existing POC firefighters to provide evening coverage at a fire station from 1800 – 0600. A crew of 4 would staff the crew between these hours for a flat rate plus the current compensation rate for actual response. This would require some renovations to the existing fire stations for crew quarters. This model would allow the Orono Fire Department achieve the Suburban Area Demand Zone or better on all calls. It would lead to better use of our personnel by having them respond to only the calls they are truly needed. 5.3.4 Paid-On-Call (POC) Fire Department This is the current operational model of the Long Lake Fire Department and many other surrounding fire departments. It does not address the issue of availability of daytime responders, especially at Station 2, identified by this assessment nor the issue of response performance. This also doesn’t address the inefficiencies in the use of personnel. All models will require some modifications to the stations. 5.4 Thresholds & Triggers – Determining When to Change the Staffing Model There isn’t one single benchmark to use that could suggest a change in the staffing model. Orono and the fire department should understand that while staffing shortages is often is a driving force, it is only one component of a larger operational landscape. Other components are longer response times, call volume, health and wellness of the responders and burnout/disinterest of volunteers. Any one or a combination of these components could be the trigger that leads to changing the response model. A high call volume can lead to burnout for the POC firefighter. They are having to respond to calls at all hours which is putting a strain on their life and leads to burnout. Staffing shortages can be a multitude of items. It is hard to find people who want to become POC firefighters. It is also an even harder task to find POC firefighters who can respond during the day when they are normally at their full-time jobs. The health and wellness of the firefighter is being studied more and more. It is showing that there are huge adverse effects on the firefighter’s health when the pager goes into alert mode. If you are able to limit the amount of time this happens or control how the notification of a call is happening with station alerting makes a big difference. The studies show a huge spike in a Orono Fire Needs Assessment 49 | Page firefighter’s blood pressure every time the pager goes into alert mode.13 With station alerting, you are able to control this spike in blood pressure by alerting the firefighters more subtle. The disinterest in the fire service by the POC firefighters is caused when a firefighter lives farther away from the station and doesn’t make a truck. They can become disinterested in responding if all they are going to do is sit and not use the skills they have trained for. Because the recruitment and retention of volunteers is expected to become more and more difficult and because 45% of the calls for service occur weekdays and non-holidays from 0600 – 1800 hours, it is evident that the current staffing model will need to change if we are to continue to provide excellent service to the citizens into the future. All of the models listed below will require significant remodels or expansions of existing facilities including crew quarters for assigned overnight hours. 13 Paige J. Rynne, Cassandra C. Derella, Carly McMorrow, Rachel L. Dickinson, Stephanie Donahue, Andrew A. Almeida, Megan Carty & Deborah L. Feairheller (2023) Blood pressure responses are dependent on call type and related to hypertension status in firefighters, Blood Pressure, 32:1, DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2161997 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 50 | Page 6.0 Courses of Actions (COAs) In this section we will review the different courses of actions that are available for Orono and the Orono Fire Department. Staff will use the preceding analysis of the current conditions and the review of the current risk and the development of trends within the City of Orono, evaluate the need for additional resources to enable Orono to provide services for the current and into the future. Course of Action (COA) Description 1. Orono Assumes Control of Existing LLFD In this COA Orono assumes operational and administrative control of the existing LLFD including staff equipment and facilities. The Cost distribution model remains the same as the current Fire contract. 2. Taxable Fire District/JPA This COA looks at Orono joining a future Fire District or JPA Department. It uses a conceptual district from a Future Fire Services Meeting Presentation. It assumes an Ad Valorum Tax distribution of Costs. 3. Orono Fire with Paid on Call Firefighters This COA looks at Orono forming a Fire department with a Full Time Chief and Paid on Call (Volunteer) firefighters. These facilities and equipment plan for this COA is Sustainable and achieves NFPA standard within the first ten years. 4. Orono Fire with Duty Crews This COA looks at Orono forming a fire department with a full time chief, daytime duty crew and Paid on Call (Volunteer) firefighters. The facilities and equipment plan for this COA is Sustainable and achieves NFPA standard within the first ten years. 6.1 COA 1: Orono Assumes Control of Existing LLFD • Description. In this COA Orono assumes operational and administrative control of the existing LLFD including staff equipment and facilities. This includes continuing the current two station organization and POC staffing. If includes continuing to invest in capital and facilities at the same rate • Cost. The cost distribution model remains the same as the current Fire contract. That model is based on 70% tax capacity and 30% call hours. The estimated annual cost to the city of Orono is $895,000 per year plus and negotiation expenses paid to Long Lake for the transfer of their portion of assets to Orono. The average cost per Orono household is $284. For this COA the estimated cost is based on the 2023 LLFD operating budget, Orono portion of the Capital Improvement Plan contribution as well as current debt service on the Fire Facilities Bond and additional capital allocation the city has made in 2023. • Advantages (pros). Advantages to this course of action are that is the least expensive of the four. With Orono assuming control greater synergy can be achieved with the other emergency services, in particular the Orono Police department. This should improve Orono Fire Needs Assessment 51 | Page overall service to Orono residents and reduce inefficiencies in emergency response. In addition, the department and its members will have access to the rest of the Orono staff and the administrative support services it can provide. • Disadvantages (Cons). A key disadvantage to this COA is that the investment in capital is too low to sustain the fleet and meet NFPA standards. This COA does not establish nor realize and improvement in emergency response. The response is likely to remain at a Rural level in our increasingly suburban and urban community. Further in this COA with its cost distribution formula Orono residents disproportionately resource the department. This COA is dependent on both Orono and Long Lake coming to a mutually agreeable agreement on the transfer of the department which has so far, since 2017 been unsuccessful. 6.2 COA 2: Taxable Fire District/Joint Powers Agreement • Description. This COA looks at Orono joining a future Fire District or JPA Department. It uses a conceptual district from a Future Fire Services Meeting Presentation. That conceptual district includes the cities of Corcoran, Greenfield, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, Wayzata, and Woodland. It also includes the current fire departments of Long Lake, Loretto/Hammel, Maple Plain and Wayzata. This COA uses an Ad Valorum (property Value) tax formula for distribution of costs. • Cost. To estimate a cost for this COA the current operating budgets of the subject departments were combined. In addition, it was assumed the capital needs of all the departments was about the same as LLFDs so a sustainable capital need was calculated. The costs were then distributed based on the subject communities’ tax capacities. Based on these calculations the annual cost to Orono would be $1,910,000. The average cost to Orono households would be $597 per year. Moving to a Duty Crews staffing structure would likely raise that cost to $2,759,000 or an average of $725 per Orono household. • Advantages (pros). Advantages of this COA would be possible capital cost avoidance in the future and a larger pool of fire fighters to draw from which might offset recruiting and retention trends. • Disadvantages (Cons). Cost burden disproportionate to services provided. Using current call volumes of the fire departments and cities included in the district, Orono would only use approximately 22% of the service but fund 34% of the budget. As one of 10 municipalities Orono would have very little local control. Improvements in service standards, capital investment and operations would require agreement between the cities served or worse yet convincing an independent board. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 52 | Page 6.3 Course of Action (COA) 3: Orono Municipal Fire Department with POC Firefighters • Description. This COA looks at Orono forming a fire department with a full time chief and Paid on Call (Volunteer) firefighters. facilities and equipment plan for this COA is sustainable and achieves NFPA standard within the first ten years. This COA would use a 1/3 Tax Value + 1/3 Population + 1/3 Call hour formula to distribute costs to any municipalities contracting with the Orono Fire Department for service. • Cost. Costs for this COA were calculating using current Operating costs for LLFD but adding a capital improvement plan that achieves NFPA standard within 10 years and then provided sustainingly funding for the future. This COA would cost Orono $978,000 per year if in partnership(contracts) with the current municipalities covered by LLFD. This amounts to an average of $320 per Orono household. If the department did not serve and contract partners the cost would be $1,357,000 per year. • Advantages (pros). This COA sees many of the same advantages of COA1. IT establishes local control for the city of Orono. It improves emergency service coordination between fire and Police. And, it provides a sustainable plan to ensure the capital needs of the department are met. In addition, the department and its members will have access to the rest of the Orono staff and the administrative support services it can provide. • Disadvantages (Cons). Disadvantages include increased cost compares for COA1. This COA does not provide for an improved response model which will likely remain at a rural response. This COA does not improve staffing/response efficiency. This model relies too heavily on firefighters being able to drop what they are doing and respond to calls especially during the weekday. 45% of our calls happen during the week from 0600-1800 hours, which is when we have our least amount of available personnel. The time slot only accounts for 36% of the week. This response model is creating a high amount of stress on the firefighters and alarms more firefighters then are necessary to handle the incident. This COA does not allow for a phased stand up of the department. 6.4 COA 4: Orono Municipal Fire Department with Duty Crews and FTEs  This is the Staff recommended COA. • Description. This COA looks at Orono forming a fire department with a full time chief, daytime duty crew and Paid on Call (Volunteer) firefighters. The facilities and equipment plan for this COA is sustainable and achieves NFPA standard within the first ten years. This COA would use a 1/3 Tax Value + 1/3 Population + 1/3 Call hour formula to distribute costs to any municipalities contracting with the Orono Fire Department for service. This COA includes establishing a suburban response standard for the department. • Cost. The Capital cost calculation for this COA is the same as COA 3. The operating costs were adjusted to include daytime duty crews. The estimated annual cost for this COA is $1,177,000 per year if in partnership(contracts) with the current municipalities covered by Orono Fire Needs Assessment 53 | Page LLFD. This amounts to an annual average of $368 per Orono household. If the department did not serve and contract partners the cost would be $1,633,000 per year. • Advantages (pros). This COA has the same advantages as COA3 such as local control, a sustainable capital plan and improved synergy with the police and other Orono departments. Most importantly this COA allows for improved response meeting suburban and urban standards. In addition, with dedicated daytime staffing, this COA would see improved fire and life safety education, better for the predictability (health) for firefighters, and improved health and life safety code enforcement • Disadvantages (Cons). This COA is more expensive than COAs 1 and 3. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 54 | Page 7.0 Recommendations Staff recommends Course of Action 4. The following summarizes the recommendations to build the fire department now and for the future. Each of these will require action by Orono and the Fire Department. We will break the recommendations down by year that they should be started and the category for them. The categories will be Personnel, Facility, Apparatus & Equipment and Miscellaneous. The first item Orono should address is a lack of a response guideline. Staff recommends that Orono moving towards the Suburban Area Demand Zone or better, which will require a different staffing model both day and night. By adopting a response guideline, staff can better recommend personnel models that will meet and or exceed the guideline. This will also lead to better response times to medicals which could result in better outcomes. Staff, Council and Community members should all be a part of the process of development of response time standards and performance targets will assist the city with future staffing decisions for the fire department. 7.0.1 Personnel As we review the staffing model based on the adopted guidelines, the 4 firefighter duty crew ot the two FTEs and the two PT duty crew firefighters would handle the majority of the calls for service weekdays from 0600 – 1800 hours. 45% of our calls for the last 9 years occurred weekdays between 0600 – 1800 hours. Once facility remodels are approved and completed, Orono Fire Needs Assessment 55 | Page we could expand this program to overnights which would help improve our firefighter’s health and wellbeing. 7.0.2 Facility There are many additions and changes to the model, facilities and equipment that need to happen so that the fire department can meet the demands now and into the future. As we build the Orono Fire Department, we want it to be a model fire department for the area, that follows best practices, state and national standards. That future needs to start now and look like the following. Staff recommends that the Orono Fire Department continue with the two- station model and conduct a facility needs analysis and study. 7.0.3 Apparatus and Equipment The two-station model requires a front out rescue pumper at each station and one reserve rescue pumper. The front out rescue pumper needs to be less than 15 years old and the reserve less than 25 per NFPA 190114. It should have a ladder truck at the central/main station and a combination brush/medical response utility at each station. A tender at each station is a requirement due to a large response area where there is no municipal water supply. One of these tenders could be shared use with the Orono Public Works Department. The department should have two fire boats. One needs to be docked on Lake Minnetonka for the summer and the other available to respond to smaller bodies of water or Long Lake. A fire/medical response 6x6 or UTV is required to respond to areas where our brush/medical utility isn’t able to respond i.e., trails, wooded areas, marshes. Staff recommends that both 20-year-old engines be replaced with new rescue pumpers or used if they meet our specifications. A ladder truck was purchased by Orono and needs to be equipped and refurbished. This is currently in progress. Staff recommends 2 new combination brush/medical utility trucks be purchased, one for each station. 7.0.4 Miscellaneous Staff recommends the Council to direct the Negotiation Team to focus on the disposition of Fire Station 1. They should either achieve a 100% ownership for Orono or the establishment of a shared ownership and use agreement. Once that is complete, direct them to work through shared ownership agreement with the equipment. This equipment and apparatus should include both tenders, Engine 22, both fire boats, the SCBAs, PPE and tools and small equipment. Staff put together a list of recommendations by year starting in 2023. 14 NFPA 1901 Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus; NFPA Orono Fire Needs Assessment 56 | Page 7.1 Recommendations for 2023 The recommendations below should be started in 2023 due to an immediate need or the item has a longer lead time. We will break them out into each category. 7.1.1 Personnel 1. Orono Firefighters Relief Association - The City of Orono will need to start a relief association regardless of what the City of Long Lake does with the fire department. Staff has already initiated the process of standing up a relief organization. The final portions of the process however will not occur until the new organization has firefighters on the roster and is functional. The Fire Chief has contacted the Secretary of State for a template/sample of the Articles of Incorporation for a MN Nonprofit Corporation. The Fire Chief has requested a template/sample set of bylaws for a relief association from the State Auditor’s Office. These will have to be filed along with the Articles of Incorporation once a relief association board is elected. The City of Orono will have to have special legislation written and passed to facilitate the move the firefighter’s pensions from Long Lake to Orono Relief Association. The Orono Council and Mayor have discussed the relief association with the Long Lake Firefighters and promised to keep them whole in the process of transition from Long Lake to Orono Relief Association. Staff recommends that the relief association be set up as a defined contribution fund. This allows the firefighters to obtain all of the funds once they are vested and not have to worry about the city council approving a benefit level. It is similar to a 401K, whereas each firefighter has their own fund 2. Firefighter Tech\Admin - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department should hire a full-time administrative assistant. The Fire Chief should create a position profile and job duties for this individual in 2023. This new position will need to respond to calls for emergency service during the day. This position should be in place before hiring of any firefighters. The posting should occur at the end of the year and the start date should be January of 2024. 3. Fire Inspector - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department should hire a full-time fire inspector. The Fire Chief should create a position profile and job duties for this individual in 2023. This new position will need to respond to calls for emergency service during the day and should be part of the Hennepin County Fire Investigation Team. This is a position, once established, could be used by our surrounding cities for fire inspections on a contract basis. This position could be in place before the hiring of firefighters. The posting should occur at the end of the year and the start date should be January of 2024. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 57 | Page 7.1.2 Facility 1. Imminent Maintenance – Orono will need to proceed with all the imminent maintenance that is needed on Station 2. This should include a new roof, exhaust removal system, improved technology, updated gear & equipment washing facilities, etc 2. Commission a facilities study - The City of Orono should hire a firm, who specializes in fire station design, to perform a facilities study. They should review each fire station and the existing public works facility. This firm should develop a plan and cost estimate for each building to be used as a fire station now, and into the future. They should account for all best practices for cancer, cardiac, PTSD and overall staffing on a 24/7 basis. Once the study is complete, Orono should work on putting the plan in place for the Navarre Fire Station as soon as possible. If the Navarre Fire Station response area is going to be moved before the end of the contract. 3. Navarre Fire Station - The City of Orono should remodel and expand the Navarre Fire Station. The scope of the remodel will be derived from the facilities study performed in the 2023 Recommendations and what vehicles we move and house at the Navarre Fire Station. 4. MNFire Model Fire Department - The Orono Fire Department should stive to become a model fire department for MNFire. The Fire Chief should work with the leaders of MNFire to review best practices for Cardiac, PTSD and Cancer prevention and strive to implement them into all aspects of our Department and Facilities. 7.1.3 Apparatus & Equipment 1. Used Ladder Truck - Refurbish and equip the used ladder truck that was purchased in the fall of 2022. Determine the scope of refurbishment that can be done in-house, locally and at MacQueen. Work with the parties to complete the refurbishment. Work on an equipment list for the vehicle and send this list to vendors for quotations. The refurbishment and the equipment procurement are in process. 2. New/Used Tender/Tanker - The City of Orono should purchase a new or used tender/tanker truck for the Navarre Fire Station. Some portions of the Navarre Fire Station’s response area of Orono have no fire hydrants. It could be a new vehicle depending on the delivery times and deadline for making the switch. 3. New Rescue Pumpers – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering of two new rescue pumpers. The specification should be similar to the rescue pumper that the Long Lake Fire Department ordered in 2017 from Toyne. We should work with the vendors to develop a cost-effective specification for the rescue pumper. The rescue pumpers should be ordered as soon as possible since lead times are going on 3 years and Annex D of NFPA 1901 recommends front out apparatus should be less than Orono Fire Needs Assessment 58 | Page 15 years old.15 Engine 21, which is completely owned by Orono, is 20 years old and Engine 11 jointly owned per the contract with Medina and Long Lake is 19. Both engines should be replaced with a new rescue pumper unless we are able to procure a used rescue pumper that meets the majority of our specifications. 4. New Brush/Utility Apparatus – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering of a new brush/utility apparatus. The specification should be similar to Utility 11 that was purchased in 1998. NFPA 1901 suggests that no fire apparatus be older than 25 years old.16 This new brush/utility can be used in response to medical or wildfire calls mainly. If the cities agree to a longer-term contract, then the vehicle can be used at either station for medical, wildfire and other call response. If the cities cannot agree, then the vehicle can be used at the Navarre Fire Station for response to medical, wildfire and other calls. This combination brush/medical utility responds to more calls than any other piece of apparatus. 5. New Pick-up Utility – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering a new pick-up utility vehicle. This new vehicle would be used to transport hose and equipment from scenes along with the ability to transport people. It would also be used by firefighters for transport to classes. It could be the utility that is used by the fire inspector to perform inspections. 6. Records Management System - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department will need a records management system. The Fire Chief should review existing record management systems on the market. These records management systems should be able to work with the State of Minnesota for the NFIRS reporting and Hennepin CAD. It should also integrate fire inspections, pre-planning, community risk reduction and scheduling among other items. The process of personalizing an online RMS system could take upwards of a year to have it up and running for use by the department and the community. 7. Online Policy and Procedures Manual - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department will need an online policy and procedure manual along with standard operating guidelines (SOGs). The Fire Chief should review existing companies for use with the Orono Fire Department. The process of personalizing an online policy and procedure manual along with SOGs could take upwards of a year to have it up and running for use by the department. We will need to incorporate the best practices into our policy, procedures and guidelines. 15 NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, 2016 Edition. 16 NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, 2016 Edition. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 59 | Page 7.1.4 Miscellaneous 1. Response Standards - The City of Orono should establish a response performance matrix. Currently, the City of Orono falls under the rural response performance from NFPA 1720.17 Staff recommends at a minimum adopting the response performance guideline for a Suburban demand zone. Staff recommends implementing duty crews for peak times or during low turnout times and then adopting NFPA 1710 for staffed stations.18 2. Quality improvement for Fire and Emergency Services – The City of Orono should send the Fire Chief to a workshop by the Center for Public Safety Excellence. The Quality Improvement for the Fire and Emergency Services workshop is offered 20 times a year and is held throughout North America. 3. Mutual Aid Agreement - The City of Orono, the Orono Fire Department and Fire Chief should implement the Hennepin County Fire Chief’s Association Mutual Aid Agreement. This was completed in January of 2023. 4. Joint & Cooperative Purchasing Agreement - The City of Orono, the Orono Fire Department and Fire Chief should implement the Hennepin County Fire Chief’s Joint & Cooperative Agreement for Public Safety Purchasing. This was completed in January of 2023. 5. Navarre Fire Station’s Response Area – The City of Orono should explore the option of moving the Navarre Fire Station’s Response Area out of the current contract. Section 21 of the contract allows for the subtraction of area serviced by the Long Lake Fire Department. Orono needs to give notice prior to July of 2023 for the 2024 budgeting. 6. Orono should start to engage Minnetonka Beach in conversation for the Orono Fire Department to cover the City of Minnetonka Beach, which had been covered by the Long Lake Fire Department 7.2 Recommendations for 2024 The recommendations below should be started in 2024 due to need or the item has a longer lead time. Staff is assuming that the City of Orono has given notice to Long Lake and Medina about moving Station 2 call area from the contract. We will break each recommendation out into each category. 17 NFPA 1720: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations and Special Operations to the Public by Volunteer Fire Departments; NFPA. 18 NFPA 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments, 2016 Edition Orono Fire Needs Assessment 60 | Page 7.2.1 Personnel 1. Firefighters for Navarre Station – The City of Orono will need to hire part-time or paid- on-call (POC) firefighters. The firefighters need to be hired about 6 months prior to responding to calls in this service area. These firefighters will be used on-call and for the duty crews. 2. Orono Firefighters Relief Association – The Fire Chief will work with the newly hired firefighters to form and file for a relief association with the State of Minnesota. 3. Firefighter Tech/Admin - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department should hire a full-time Firefighter Tech/Admin. The Fire Chief should create a position profile and job duties for this individual in 2023. This new position will need to respond to calls for emergency service during the day. This position should be in place before hiring of any firefighters. The posting should occur at the end of the year and the start date should be January of 2024. 4. Fire Inspector - The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department should hire a full-time fire inspector. The Fire Chief should create a position profile and job duties for this individual in 2023. This new position will need to respond to calls for emergency service during the day. This is a position, once established, could be used by our surrounding cities for fire inspections on a contract basis. This position could be in place before the hiring of firefighters. The posting should occur at the end of the year and the start date should be January of 2024. 7.2.2 Facility 1. Imminent Maintenance – The cities will need to proceed with all the imminent maintenance that is needed on Station 1. This should include a new roof, exhaust removal system, improved technology, updated gear & equipment washing facilities, etc. 2. The City of Orono will need to remodel fire station 1. This could require a shared use agreement with the City of Long Lake for Station 1. The scope of work will be derived from the facilities study performed from the 2023 Recommendations. 7.2.3 Apparatus & Equipment 1. New Command Truck - The City of Orono should purchase a new or used command truck. This command truck will be used by the Fire Chief. The existing command truck can be used by the Duty Officer to respond to calls. This Duty Officer program will be similar to the one that was set up for LLFD. 2. Personal Protective Equipment - The City of Orono will need to outfit each firefighter with PPE. Staff recommends purchasing the PPE and adding it to the Capital Budget plan and replacing it every five years. This will give a firefighter a front set of PPE and a Orono Fire Needs Assessment 61 | Page backup set of PPE after year five. This process is following best practices for cancer prevention from MNFire. Staff recommends that this PPE be funded through the operating budget uniform line item by annual transfer from the Fire Capital Fund. 3. Fire Equipment for the Navarre Fire Station - The City of Orono will need to purchase equipment for the Navarre Fire Station that is removed during the transfer from Long Lake to Orono. This could be equipment that was donated to the City of Long Lake or other equipment needed for best practices. 4. New Fire Boat – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering of a new fire boat similar to the donated fire boat that LLFD currently uses and the new fire boat that Excelsior Fire purchased. The best practice is to have similar equipment and vehicles to our mutual aid partners. 5. New Brush/Utility Apparatus - The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering of a new brush/utility apparatus. The specification should be similar to one purchased in 2023 recommendations. This new brush/utility will be used in response to medical or wildfire calls mainly. 6. New 6x6 Brush/Medical Utility – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering a new 6x6 brush/medical response unit with trailer similar to the one Long Lake Fire currently operates. 7. Online Shift Scheduling Software – The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department will need an online personnel scheduling software. The Fire Chief should review existing online scheduling software on the market. These online shift scheduling systems should be able to work with both POC and Full-time personnel. It should also integrate with our fire station display dashboards and have an app for ease of use by the firefighters. This should be implemented before firefighters are hired and responding to incidents. 8. Online Training Software – The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department will need an online training platform. The Fire Chief should review existing online training platforms on the market. These online training platforms should be sanctioned by the Minnesota Board of Firefighter Training and Education. This should be implemented before firefighters are hired and responding to incidents. 7.2.4 Miscellaneous 1. State Fire Marshall – The Fire Chief will contact the State fire Marshall’s office to do an inspection of Station 2 for the purpose of obtaining a fire department identification number. 2. Orono should start to engage Medina in conversation for the Orono Fire Department to cover the small area of Medina which had been covered by the Long Lake Fire Department starting January 1,2026 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 62 | Page 7.3 Recommendations for 2025 The recommendations below should be started in 2025 due to a need or the item has a longer lead time. We will break them out into each category. 7.3.1 Personnel 1. Station 1 Firefighters – The City of Orono will need to hire part-time or paid-on-call (POC) firefighters. The firefighters need to be hired about 6 months prior to responding to calls in this service area. These firefighters will be used on-call and for the duty crews. 2. Fire Training Chief – The City of Orono and the Orono Fire Department should hire a full- time fire training chief. The Fire Chief should create a position profile and job duties for this individual in 2025. This new position will need to respond to calls for emergency service during the day. This is a position, once established, could be used by our surrounding fire departments for fire training on a contract basis. It also could operate the joint Fire Police Training Facility, if one is built. The posting should occur at the end of the year and the start date should be January of 2026. This investment would help our fire department become even better, similar to Plymouth, Minnetonka, Chanhassen and Chaska. This training officer could be contracted out to surrounding fire departments as recommended in the Assessment of Shared Services19 conducted by McGrath Consulting Group in July of 2016 7.3.2 Apparatus & Equipment 1. Personal Protective Equipment - The City of Orono will need to outfit each firefighter with PPE. Staff recommends purchasing the PPE and adding it to the Capital Budget plan and replacing it every five years. This will give a firefighter a front set of PPE and a backup set of PPE after year five. Staff recommends that this PPE be funded through the operating budget uniform line item by annual transfer to the Fire Capital Fund. 2. Fire Equipment for Station 1 - The City of Orono will need to purchase equipment for Station 1. This could be equipment that was donated to the City of Long Lake or other equipment needed Fire Station. 3. New Pick-up Utility – The City of Orono should start the process of specification and ordering a new pick-up utility vehicle. This new vehicle would be used to transport hose and equipment from scenes along with the ability to transport people. It would also be used by firefighters for transport to classes. 19 Assessment of Shared Services: Shared Training Services, Staffing and Personnel Deployment for the Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain and Mound Fire Departments by McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. July of 2016 Orono Fire Needs Assessment 63 | Page 7.4 Recommendations for 2026 and beyond 7.4.1 Facility 1. Replace Dock on Lake Minnetonka – The City of Orono should purchase a new wider and more stable dock for the fire boat and City’s pontoon. The dock should be a minimum of 4 feet wide and be made out of a non-slip composite or aluminum decking. The current dock was donated a while ago and is not in the best shape for use as an emergency dock. It is difficult to load and unload the equipment needed for response on Lake Minnetonka with the smaller width of the dock. 2. Orono Fire and Police Joint EOC & Training Facility – The City of Orono should review adding an Emergency Operations Center (EOC), live fire training facility and classrooms to Station 1 or surrounding properties for joint training usage by the fire and police departments. This could be used as a regional training facility for surrounding mutual aid partners on a contractual basis. It would function as the main EOC for the City of Orono. The Fire Chief of Training could help run this joint training facility. This training facility would fill a void in the area since there isn’t a training facility within 20-minutes of our area In Summary, staff recommends the following 5-year goals; equipment and apparatus modernization, upgraded fire stations, 24/7 staffed stations with a combination of duty crews and full-time personnel, a more efficient fire department, a joint Fire and Police Training Facility and EOC. These recommendations will bring the Orono Fire Department to the current best practices and national standards. Orono has the personnel and resources to move the department forward and make it a model department for the future. This plan will serve as a road map to the future for the department. The plan includes the ability to keep the facilities, personnel and equipment up to date and meeting guidelines. It helps identify critical issues and potential impediments to implementation. Raising cost and the need to identify long term funding is addressed as we look into the future towards 2040. Please see Annex B for staff’s long-term CIP for the Orono Fire Department. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 64 | Page Annex A – Heat Maps The above heat map is for alarm calls in the City of Orono in the past 9 years. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 65 | Page The above heat map is for fire calls in the City of Orono for the past 9 years. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 66 | Page The above heat map is for medical calls in the City of Orono for the past 9 years. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 67 | Page The above heat map is for the other calls in the City of Orono in the past 9 years. Orono Fire Needs Assessment 68 | Page Annex B – Orono Fire Capital Plan Orono Fire Needs Assessment 69 | Page Annex C – Orono Fire Organizational Chart Orono Fire Needs Assessment 70 | Page Annex D – Timeline Orono Fire Needs Assessment 71 | Page Orono Fire Needs Assessment 72 | Page Annex E – Management Component Charts Foundational Management Elements Chart Long Lake Fire Department Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals and Objectives Mission Statement Yes Displayed Yes Periodic Review Yes Vision Established and Communicated Yes Values of Staff Established Yes Strategic or Master Plan No Adopted by Elected Officials N/A Published and Available N/A Periodic Review N/A Agency Goals and Objectives Established Yes Date Developed Annually Periodic Review Yes Tied to Division/Personnel Performance Statements/Plans Yes Objectives Linked to Programs N/A Performance Objectives Established N/A Code of Ethics Established Yes Orono Fire Needs Assessment 73 | Page Management and Processes Chart Long Lake Fire Department Availability of SOPs, Rules and Regulations, Policies Copies of Rules Provided Yes Last Date Reviewed Annually Copies of SOGs or Guidelines Available Yes Regular Update Yes Process for Development of New SOGs Yes SOGs Used in Training Evolutions Yes Policy Manual Available Yes Reviewed for Consistency Yes Reviewed for Legal Mandates Yes Training on Policies Provided Yes Internal Communications Regularly Scheduled Staff Meetings Yes Written Staff Meeting Minutes No Memos Yes Member Newsletter Yes Open Door Policy Yes Orono Fire Needs Assessment 74 | Page Record Keeping and Documentation Chart Long Lake Fire Department Document Control Process for Public Access Established Yes Hard Copy Files Protected Yes Computer Files Backed Up No Document Security Building Security Yes Office Security Yes Computer Security Yes Monetary Controls Used Cash Access Controls N/A Credit Card Controls Yes Purchasing Controls Yes Reporting and Records Periodic Report to Elected Officials Yes Financial Report Yes, Annually Management Report Yes Annual Report Produced Yes Distributed to Others Yes Required Maintenance Records Incident Reports Yes Patient Care Reports Yes Exposure Records Yes Orono Fire Needs Assessment 75 | Page SCBA Testing Yes Hose Testing Yes Ladder Testing Yes Pump Testing Yes Breathing Air Testing Yes Orono Fire Needs Assessment 76 | Page Annex F – Equipment Standards NFPA 1901 governs the design of fire apparatus while NFPA 150020 addresses firefighter healthy safety. Together these two standards have assisted in developing the concept of the “Clean Cab”. In the typical fire apparatus design, contaminated firefighter protective gear and equipment are loaded or bracketed into the apparatus cab as firefighters leave a fire incident and return to the fire station. The smell of a “fire” and associated carcinogen particles lingers in the cab and is noticeable even days later. The science has proven that carcinogens attach to the PPE and equipment and continue to off-gas while firefighters are in the apparatus. This concept focuses on specifically designing the cab of new apparatus to be free from firefighting equipment that can be easily contaminated on the fireground. This includes equipment such as self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), tools, hand lights and other small equipment. The design provides a nonporous interior so that the cab can be easily cleaned after a fire to reduce any secondary cross contamination. The goal is to reduce firefighter exposure to contaminated gear and off-gassing equipment and to address numerous other safety concerns. Long Lake Fire does go through a gross decontamination process on scene after every fire incident before going back to the fire station. The Orono Fire Department should incorporate this best practice into our specifications for all new fire apparatus and push to make sure this is in any used fire apparatus that we may purchase going forward. Annex D of NFPA 190121 includes life cycle recommendations regarding frontline and reserve apparatus. The standard recommends that apparatus should provide 15 years of frontline service and then be turned over for reserve status. The annex further recommends that apparatus that are more than 25 years old be retired from the vehicle fleet. Reviewing the above fleet, the fire department should have 2 frontline engines and one reserve. Currently one apparatus is at the 25-year mark and in need of replacement. There will need to be a significant investment in the fleet over the next 5 to 10 years regardless of who is operating the fire department. This investment may need to be sooner due to the ever-lengthening lead times for fire equipment, PPE and apparatus. Common life expectancy for types of apparatus are as follows; Engine/Pumper 20 years, Ladder 25 years, Tanker/Tenders 25 years, Rescue 10 years, Utility 10 years, Staff 7 years or if a vehicle is over 100,000 miles. 20 NFPA 1500: Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program; NFPA 21 NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus; NFPA Orono Fire Needs Assessment 77 | Page Annex G – Emergency Response Staffing Charts Fire Response Staffing Responders On Scene Roles 1 Incident Commander 1 Engine/Pump Operator 2 Firefighters on attack line 2 Firefighters on backup line 1 Company Officer/Firefighter for attack line 1 Company Officer/Firefighter for backup line 2 Firefighters for search and rescue 2 Firefighters for ventilation 2 Firefighters for rapid intervention 1 Aerial/Ladder Operator 15 Total Responders Needed Non-Structure Fire Staffing Responders On Scene Roles 1 Incident Commander 1 Engine/Pump Operator 1 Engine/Pump Officer 2 Firefighters on attack line 5 Total Responders Needed Orono Fire Needs Assessment 78 | Page EMS Incident Staffing Responders On Scene Roles 1 Rescue Operator 1 Rescue Officer 2 Patient Care 4 Total Responders Needed Auto Crash with Extrication Incident Staffing Responders On Scene Roles 1 Incident Commander 1 Engine/Pump Operator 1 Engine/Pump Officer 2 Firefighters on attack line 1 Backup Engine/Pump Operator 1 Backup Engine/Pump Officer 2 Extrication 1 Rescue Operator 1 Rescue Officer 2 Patient Care 13 Total Responders Needed Orono Fire Needs Assessment 79 | Page Annex H – Firefighter Health and Safety Information Ensuring the health and safety of employees should be a high priority in any business or government organization. Many fire service organizations offer proactive health and wellness programs designed to promote and support healthy lifestyles. This program helps to ward off illness and injury. The best practice is to follow NFPA 158222 and International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) / International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) wellness program23. Firefighters need to be medically fit to meet the strenuous duties associated with fire ground task and emergency response. In addition, state and federal law mandates respiratory medical assessment, clearance and fit testing for anyone required to wear a respirator. CFR 1910.134(e)(1) requires employees obtain a medical clearance from a physician or other licensed health care professional before they can wear a respirator (including N95, N100, P100 and HEPA respirators), and must be fit tested annually. A 10-year review (1994-2004) of firefighter line of duty death statistics revealed that 45 percent were the result of heart disease. In 2010, The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducted a study of the prevalence of cancer in 30,000 firefighters. NIOSH researchers found that firefighters had a 9% increase in a cancer diagnosis and a 14% increase in cancer related deaths. According to NFPA, more than 68% of all firefighters will develop some form of cancer in their lifetimes. The rate of line of duty deaths from cancer-related illness is increasing rapidly and is on pace to overtake cardiac disease as the leading cause of firefighter deaths nationwide. Ensuring employees are medically cleared to perform rigorous fire ground tasks, along with identifying any pre-existing conditions which may place an employee in jeopardy, is an important screening component in the hiring process and beyond. According to the International Association of Firefighters, more than 12% of all firefighters will develop heart disease at some point in their lives. Even young and healthy firefighters suffer from hardened arteries and impaired heart function after just three hours of prolonged firefighting, according to a 2010 study from the Illinois Fire Service Institute.24 22 NFPA1582: Standard on Comprehensive Occupational Medical Program for Fire Departments, NFPA. 23 The Fire Service Joint Labor Management Wellness-Fitness Initiative Fourth Edition 24 https://mnfireinitiative.com/resources/heart-health/ Fire Department Comment Card Name (First & Last) Address Date Orono Resident: Yes No Questions/Comments: AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to forecast future work session agendas. 2. Background / Summary. The Official Meetings Calendar Adopted by the Council establishes a work session meeting at 5 PM on the same days as regular council meetings which begin at 6 PM. 3. Next Work Session. The draft agenda for the next work session includes a review of draft retaining wall language. This is a continuation of the discussion on the same topic held on April 24th. 4. Proposed Future Topics. This is an opportunity for council members to propose and agree to future work session topics. 5. Work Session Items. The table below depicts topics for works sessions. Those shaded have already occurred. Those in the future are proposed. Date Subject Date Subject 9 Jan 23 -THC License discussion - Navarre Parking Lot Funding 10 Jul 23 23 Jan 23 None-Mtg Cancelled 24 Jul 23 - General Fund Budget Update 13 Feb 23 - Brush and Leaf Disposal - City Council -Staff Procedures 14 Aug 23 27 Feb 23 - City Council -Staff Procedures - Park Commissioner interviews 28 Aug 23 13 Mar 23 -No items -Cancelled 11 Sep 23 - Enterprise Budgets Update 21 Mar 23 - Planning Commissioner interviews-if needed 25 Sep 23 10 Apr 23 - 2024 Street Maintenance 9 Oct 23 - CIP Update 24 Apr 23 - Retaining Wall Discussion - Planning & Park Commission Interview 23 Oct 23 8 May 23 - 2024 Street Maintenance Part II - Draft Fire Needs Study Report 13 Nov 23 22 May 23 - Retaining Wall Discussion Part II 27 Nov 23 - Fee Schedule Update 12 Jun 23 - THC Legislation Update - Preliminary Budget Guidance 11 Dec 23 - Community Survey Discussion 26 Jun 23 - Average Lakeshore Setbacks 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend holding the next Work Session as scheduled. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A. Discuss future Work Session Topics B. Move to hold next Council Work Session as scheduled. Item No.: 24 Date: April 24, 2023 Item Description: Next Work Session Draft Agenda Presenter: Adam T. Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: City Administrators Report