HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-07-28 Letter, Legal Ruling Dock Constructioni.t•�,•,r1t• `� [� C� C OM �
hr R 1987 'J
Am F-1 Bank HBca w•e,t
July 28, 1987
%4-- lrnhe
A.I.—Ota 55067
T.Me..m 16121.1M M41
I eWcrp,w 16121333Lt506
Mr. Frank Mixa
Gavin[ leFevae
Executive Director
H"benP Letle.
Lake Minnetonka Conservation
J Def"Y 08—
,hM., F [Newt
District
Dn.ndJ K,*•m,1r
402 East Lake Street
,Am"'ItE 11d,Mta,
Wayzata, rill 55391
k•.kv.. E Pw,A,.,
ltrlwdJ Sct.ett..
Re: Dianis v. Narren
C1wlm L. LeFe we
14.M+1 P t:"Y 111
• Jnn.esJ 11,.nt.ca,J.
Dear Frank:
T Imn"„ R Gell
Dade NoW,
Attached is a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions
Steven s�► Wt
of Law and Order of Judge Rogers in the above -entitled
jan,"" St.o„n.a.
case.
Flo-nW N. Rnttr
%Vae"'P•1oiw,
Although Mr. and Mrs. Dianis may not be too happy with
9 Y ! P}'
W46m R Skene.tnl
RodnrvD A,.$ -,so.
the result of this case, it does protect the LMCD
C..mwA 16•..0
ordinances. The Court concluded that the H. rrens have a
Bnw,tA...
legal right to construct a dock from the Dianis property.
9 9 p Y
Poul E Ftasr.■num
PMAE
Steven M. To—
However, the dock must be outside of the LMCD setback
MwvFwKeeSke'^
area and, therefore, within the Dianis authorized dock
C1.0100wJ NW -00W
use area.
T.mntw ,1 rnm.nr
MA A
Ju&eA e -W-
Assuming this case is not roversed on appeal, it could be
helpful in future cases where creation of dockage rights
by easement result in a conflict with LMCD ordinances.
If you have any questions, please feel tree to give me a
call.
Very truly yours,
Charles L. LeFevere
CLL:rsr
Enclosure
REC;bIv�.
JUL i U i987
LM.C.D.