Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-06-13 Property Owner Letter, Legal Description of Property - 3 PagesJAMES D. KEMPF OOUGLAS P. KEMPF ATTORNEYS AT LAW f:OMMUNITY },TATE IIANII ULOn. 9637 LVNDALE AVE 90. 8LOOM•NOTn N, MINNL9OIA 1%-20 OEEICE unu•nnzn NEU MUI-V376 June 13, 1986 City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota 55323 Attention: Mike Graffron Assistant Zoning Adminlatrator Re: 3450 Birch Lane, Wayzata, Minn. Our Ref.: Raymond and Doris Kempf Dear Mr. Graffron: 1 am enclosing herewlrh a legal descr!ptlon of the above- described property, which is quite lengthy. I am also enclosing a survey apparently used to procur a building permit for a garage on the described property. The survey shows the existi-A garage. I believe that the existing garage was destroyed and a new garage erected, which, I believe, nets approximately 10 feet north of the southerly line of the northeast half of the lot, and approximately 10 feet back from the southwesterly line of the northeasterly half of the lot. I do not have an as -built survery. It is my understanding that the existing newer system terminates at approximately the southwesterly line of the lot at the termination of Birch Lane, and that that sewer drains to the west, and that there is an additional sewer located to the easterly side of the lot which drains to the east. It is my understanding that no sever exists on the casement described in the very last paragraph of the attached legal description. It is my further understanding that It is not contemplated that such a sewer will be constructed. In procuring the building permit for the double garage erected on the premises, my brother, the owner of the lot, applied for and procured a variance apparently to build the present garage. I am not sure, again, of its precise distance from the various lines of the lot. My brother has sold the property on a Contract for Deed, and of course, the purchaser is concerned that if a sever were to be constructed that the distruction of the garage or the removal of the garage might be required; and therefore, is desirous of having the easement described in the last paragraph of