HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-19-1976 Planning Packetu.
I
pmiD
A r ** p ^
0>WTSSI(K NO-ETINC /M'RIL 'lvjli976
ORONO CIPi' HALL - 7:^0 P.M.
I.CURRENT ITEMS
A.Action Items
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
#104 - Public Hearing - 7:30 P.M. - Kelly Avenue Holding Comnany -
2500 Kelly Avenue - Subdivision and PRD
Minutes - Regular Mpeting of April 5, 1976
#101 - Kelly Avenue Holding Company - 2500 Kelly Avenue - Rezoning
#97 - A. T. Esco - 300 Crestview Avenue - Street Vacation OiiH Street)
#96 - Kenneth W. Oicn - 2980 Casco Point Road - Sitfidivision
#106 - Kenneth W. Oien - 2980 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit
#103 - John Lambin (Burger King) - 3340 Shoreline Drive - Conditional
Use Permit
Ikilti-IVelling Ordinance Review
#92 - Super Value Stores - 3333 Shoreline Drive - Final Plat
B.Work Session Items
1.
•>^ •
3.
4.
5.
6.
#111 - George Jenos - 3030 Casco Point Road - Rip Piip
#112 - Vincent Johnson - 601 Minnetonka Highlands Lane - V'ariance
#113 - 5>heldon L. Quasi - 235 Crestview Avenue - Variance
#114 - Kem Ifonpe, Etal - 2608-2610 Mapleridge Lane - Lot Rearrangement
#115 - Donald F. Hagen - 2130 Shadvwood Road - Conditional Use Permit
and Rip Rap
#116 - David C. Orrfieim - 1430 (lierrv Place - VarisBice
C.Incomplete Items (Status)
1.
2.
3.
#103 - J(^ Lambin (Burger King) - 3340 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use
Permit - Public Hearing Scheduled for May 3, 1976
#109 - 315 East Grant Corp. - 3340 .Shoreline Drive - Subdivision -
Public Hearing Scheduled for May 3, 1976
#107 - Alan Sweetser - 845 Old Long Lake Road - Sii)division -
Public Hearing Scheduled for May 3, 1976
II.COMPLETED ITEMS FOR CTHNCIL
A.Open Items
1.#102 - Ronald Ross - 1960 Lakeview Terrace - Conditional Permit -
Council gave choice to combine lots or give City conservation easement
B.Gomnleted Items
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
#100 - Tom Giere - 350 North Arm Lane - Subdivision - Concurred
#105 r Gerald Lee Rowlette - 3775 Bayside Road - Variance - Concurred
#73 - Phillip Dykstra - 3080 Nort!i 5>hore Drive - Final Plat - Concurred
#55 - Iflmer Construction Company - 70 190 Willow Drive North - Final
Plat - Concurred
#108 - Everett S, Goodfellow - 3510 North Shore Drive - Variance - Concurred
#110 - Oliver S. McCurdv - 1045 North Arm Drive - Variance - Concurred
0
City of Plymouth Letter - Concurred
MFC Park and Ride Station • Navarre - Concurred
p. C .
; ■
/9-7^ '
<>. v
’ t--, .ijt-"’
AA
^ .^ ..
^ >rf
■ Vi% -1
■ * ‘■‘■‘V'^^jr v'
* ». I ■ : '
•V »i
/ y
REGULAR PD\I^ING^O»M APRIL 5, 1976
The Orcno Planning Commission met on the above date vdth ATIENDANffi - 7:33 P.M.
the following members present: Chairman C. Paul Pesek. ffem-
bers Brad Van Nest, Gregg Hannah, Diane Dunlap, Gloria McDonald,
John P. Hake and Zoning Administrator, Hank MUhich.
Qiairman Pesek announced that this was the time and place
for a Piiblic Hearing on the petition of A. T. csco for the
vacation of Hill Street. The Notice of Public Hearing and
Affadavit of Publication were presented. The Zoning Admini
strator plained that the Council had previously denied the
same petition due to Hill Street being the only access to
vacant property to the East of the Esco property and if va
cated it would result in land locking those properties.
Jerry Snyder, attorney representing the applicant, requested
the Comnission to review the survey showing that the garage
and a portion of the existing house, including the well, pro
trudes into Hill Street. The attorney stated that the only
way the Esco's could obtain marketable title for their pro
perty was by vacation of that portion of the street where the
house is located. It was noted that Lots 7 and 18, the East
erly properties, had not yet been developed and so access
problems still existed for these tracts. Van Nest noted that
tremendous ravines existed on these lands making it impract
ical to build an access except thru Hill Street. Mr. Snyder
explained that the Esco's had retreated in their request for
a complete vacation but were only asking for 3.8 ft. so that
the house will be completely on Esco owned property. Me ex
plained that this was an existing situation when the Esco's
purchased the property and they were presently in a law suit
with the former owner concerning the issue. After all the
piiblic present were afforded opportunity to be heard, the
hearing was closed.
Chairman Pesek called to order the Public Hearing on the re
zoning application of the Kelly Avenue Holding Company. The
Zoning Administrator presented the Notice of Public Hearing,
Affadavit of Pii)iication and proceeded to explain that the
purpose of the application was to rezone to residential a 20
ft. conmercially zoned strip which is presently located in a
parcel residentially zoned. Daniel T. Lindsay, representing
the Kelly Avenue Holding Company, explained that they wished
downgrading of the commercial area to residential ^ part of
a Planned Residential Development and felt that this could be
an important factor in the upcoming subdivision. The Zoning
Administrator expressed his feelings that this would be bene-
fical due to the topography of the land, consisting of hills
and ravines, requiring filling and grading in order to be
utilized for commercial purposes. Commercial use would re
sult in additional hardcover and the problems of stoim water
runoff and pollution of the lake and ground water. He noted
that the re zoning would create a more natural line between
zoning districts. The Ccmmission inquired concerning wetlands
and were told that there were some, but less than was orgin-
ally thought. The petitioner stated that more facti:al data
would be forthcoming. After all the public were heard, the
hearing was closed,
PUBLIC HEARING - 7:33 P.M.
A. T. Espn
VACATION OF HILL STREET
PUBLIC HEARING - 7:45 P.M.
KELLY AVENUE HOLDING 00.
2505 KELLY AVENUE
REZONING
MINUTES OF A PLANNING OOM^SSICN MEETING HELD APRIL 5, 1976 - PAGE 2.
Chaiiman Pesek called to order the Regular Meeting of the
Orono Planning Goninission.
Hdce moved, Hannah seconded, that the Minutes of the Plan
ning Gonnission Meeting held March 15, 1976, be approved.
Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
CALL TO ORDER - 7:55 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MEETING OF 3/15/76
The Gonnission proceeded to discuss the A. T. Esco street
vacation request. McDonald felt that no road vrould ever be
constructed but saw a possible future need for it's existence.
Pesek felt that 3.8 ft. would not be haxmful and the balance
could still service the lands to the east. The Zoning Adndni*
strator disagreed stating that the City would need the full
road for future utilities and maintenance. Van Nest noted
that in order to vacate land a public interest must be served.
The menbers, in turn, felt that the Esco's were public and the
situation created a hardship to them. It was agreed that the
City Attorney and Street Department be consulted as to idiat
constitutes piblic interest and what maintenance problems
mi^t result from the vacation. Hann^ moved, Du^ap seconded,
that the A. T. Esco application for vacation of Hill Street
be tabled until the Gonnission had receipt of reconmendations
from the City Attorney and Street Department. Motion, Ayes
(6) - Nays (0).
A. T. ESCO
300 CRESTVIEW AVENUE
VACATION OF HILL STREET
5 P.M.
GO.
Chaiiman Pesek announced that this was the time and place for
a Public Hearing on the subdivision request of Thomas Giere
for 350 North Arm Lane. The Notice of Public Hearing and Af-
fadcvit of Publication were presented. Mr. Giere explained
tliat he would like to sibdivide a parcel consisting of 9.6
acres into two lots, one of 5.4 acres having .4 acre of wet
lands and the other 4.1 acres and that both were located on a
man made channel in a two acre zoned district. He noted that
the tivo lots would be about 176 ft. wide and so would need a
vailance of 24 ft. from the required 200 ft. After all the
public were heard, the hearing was closed.
PUBLIC HEARING - 8:04 P.M.
THDMAS GIERE
350 NORTH ARM LANE
SUBDIVISION
Qiairman reopened the Regular Meetiig. Dunlap moved, Hannah
seconded, that the Planning Comnission recomn^ to the Council
approval of the Thomas Giere subdivision and variance request
as submitted. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0),
SUBDIVISION
Nfr and Mrs. Everett J. Schroeder of 2565 Kelly Avenue arrived
too late for the Piblic Hearing on the Kelly Avenue Holding
Comncny rezoning proposal. The Comnission noted the possi
bility of Mr. Lindsay's return when the Comnission planned to
review his PRD proposal later in the evening. They agreed
with Mr. Schroder to discuss together the two proposals of
rczoning and subdivision later in the evening.
KELLY AVENUE HOLDING CO.
2505 KELLY AVQUE
REZGNING
minutes of a PLWNING OOrWiOw meeting held APRIL 5, 1976 • .'Affl 3..M.
I
Qiainnan Pesek announced that it was time f6r the Pil>lic Hearing on the sU>division application of Kenneth W. Oien
for his property at 2980 Casco Point Road and the Zoning AdmiJl-
istrator t^tesented the Notice of Pii>lic Hearing and Affadavit
of M>liCation» Mr* Oien explained that he would like to di
vide his 51,000 sq. ft. tract into t»lo lots both exceeding 1/2
acre and the 100 ft. lot width requirement. The Zoning Admin
istrator called attention to a map he had drafted after receiving
survey information from the heis^ritig. property owner, Haidltoh
Moran. It shiiwed that the present existing Casco Point Road,
which did not fbllow the line of the platted road, and right-
of-way would nn through the Oien property, thus reducing the
available area necessarty to meet the Zoning Code, the Zoning
Adninistrator stated that State statutes provide for the righ^
of fliaiicipalities to aquire 33 ft of property on both sides of
any road used and maintained for more than six years. Mr. Oien
stated that his property was Torrens and felt that it was not
likely. Hanilton Moran, idio was in attendance, also expressed
interest in the road situation because it would place his ex
isting house rifi^t in the middle of the road. After all the
public were heard, the hearing was closed.
PUBLIC HEARING - 8:15 P.M. KENNETH W. OIEN
2980 CASOO POINT MAD
SUBDtVISIGN
P.M.
The Chairman reopened the regular meeting. Van Nest moved.
Hake seconded, that the subdivision aDolication of X^eth
W. Oien be tabled until the next meeting in order that a sur
vey showing the existing roadwi^ and right-of-way in relation
to the Oien property be presented and to include an accurate
coaputation of tiie dry buildable area excluding the roadway
and right-of-way. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
V ETH W. OIEN
2980 CASCO POINT ROAD
SUBDIVISION
The GoBmission reviewed the application of Ronald Ross to
place an accessory building on a thru lot located at 1960
Lakeview Terrace. As the Comwission began to reconmend ap
proval with a condition requiring Mr. Ross to combine his
homestead property with his vacant adjoining lot, Mr. Ross
<^jected and requested *diat his adjoining property not be a
consideration in the petition. The Commission pointed out
that presently his honesite was located in a two acre zone
and his existing homesite consisted on one acre. Combina
tion with the adjoining lot would bring his pr^rty up to
present zoning requirements. The Zoning Administrator ad
vised Mr. Ross that a Building Permit could not be issued
for the vacant lot because it consisted of about 751 wet
lands. He also advised the Planning Commission that a
combination now would prevent problems that might result
from any new owner purchasing tiie property with intentions
to build on a parcel consisting mostly of wetlands. He felt
that as long as the two parcels are not conbined, the City
would have no control over the sale of each individual
parcel. Althou^ Mr. Ross persisted in objecting to this
condition. Van Nest pointed out that it was well within
the Commission jurisdiction to make recommendation having
stipulated conditions. Van Nest moved. Hake seconded, that
the Planning Comnission reconmend to the Council approval
of the Conditional Use Permit application of Ronald Ross
subject to the combination of ^ots 1 and 2, Block 1, long
Lake Gomtry Club Addition. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
RONALD ROSS
1960 LAKEVIEN TERRACE
CONDITIONAL USB FBFMIT
_ _
-_
MINimSS OF A planning commission meeting held APRIL 5, 1976 - PAGE SP.M.
rs i
wheTd>y, thiou^ pruchase or easements of properties the pro- JOHN LAMBIN (BURGER KING)
posed approach could be moved nortii of the power pole on the Cent.
Church boulevard. Mr. Lambin then presented a redrawn plan that
would place tiie entrance to the restaurant on County Road 15,
fiirtiier east of the Shell Station driveway. The plan proposed
would increase the paiicing spaces to 67 cars. "Hie Conmission
inquired concerning the ippearance of the building and sug^sted
that a landscape plan be prepared. Mr. Lanbin stat^ that the
restaurant would be esthetically pleasing on four sides and that
no fill would be needed for the construction. Becruse the Burger
King would have a drive-up window, the Comtdssion discussed the
classification status of it being a drive-in or a restaurant.
Several members felt that nay traffic problems would be eased
by a vacation of Navarre Lane that is now barracaded at Couity
Road 19 to the Calvary Manorial Church. This would permit
church motbers to park at their lot to the rear of the church
instead of #19 and would relieve an immediate problem. It was
suggested to Mr. Lanbin that he contact the church concerning
this possibility and that he come to an agreement with them to
use the upper portion of the road as access way for his restau
rant proposal. Although several Comnission meihbers felt strongly
that the traffic was a detrimental factor, it was suggested to
Mr. Lanbin that he contact Calvary Manorial Church about poss
ible vacation of Navarre Lane, prepare a landscape plan and give
a square foot bre^down on the restaurant s food preparation
area and the dining area. The Conmission directed that a
Public Hearing be scheduled on the petition for ^fey 3, 1976, at
7:45 P.M. in 5ie Coincil Chanbers.
The Conmission, as part of their work session, reviewed the
Kenneth Oien request for filling and grading the driveway
area at his tract located at 2980 Casco Point Road. The
Commission called attention to a memo from the City Street
Superintendent vbich read as follows:
(Dated 26 March 1976) There is at this location a tile line
from the outlet end of a ailvert to the lake. This culvert
and tile drains the southwest side of Casco Point Roat at
this point. If this property is to be filled the outlet end
of the culvert should be located by the own3r and a catch bas
in and cover should be constructed by him. Also, a swale
should be provided for the mnoff of water from the south side
of the road at this point so as not to direct runoff directly
to the house at 2980 Casco Point Road or the structures at
2946 Casco Point Road. IVhen the tile line is exposed, it
should be inspected by the City to determine wliether it meets
the legal requirements of a storm sewer. If it does not, the
owner nust install a system that meets all legal requirements.
(BjO John Geihardson
Mr. Oien, who was present for the review, was sked to clarify
the elevation areas on his survey but was unable to do so. Hake
moved, Dunlap seconded, that Gordon Coffin, Surveyor, be con
tacted to prepare new plans as a larger scale and an elevation
plan showing existing grades and proposed clianges. relating to
the Kenneth W. Oien fill application. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays
(0).
KENNETH W. OIEN
2980 CASCO POINT ROAD
IITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO FILL 6 GRADE
M wNl
4.‘ '
MINUTES OF A REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 5, 1976 • PAGE 4.The ComnissiGn turned their attention to Richard Rowlett's petition for a variance on lakeshore and street setback in order to put an addition onto his existing home. He explained that the addition of 36' x 28' would consist of a
dining room and a garage. The proposed lakeshore setback
would be 66 ft. and 23 ft. from the street property line. He
stated that there was no other place on the lot to do this ex
cept as presented. As a compensation to the City, he volunte
er^ to remove an existing 20' x 20' concrete patio facing the
lakeshore and replace it with an open redwood deck. The Zoning
Administrator estimated that this would result in a net decrease
of 200 sq. ft. of hardcover. Hake moved, McDonald seconded,
that the Planning Comnission recomnend to the Council approval
of the lakeshore and stT^et setback variance request of Richard
Rowlette conditional upon removal of the 20' x 20' concrete deck
being replaced by a non-pcrvious type deck because the City
would gain a 200 sq. ft. decrease in hardcover. !btion. Ayes
(6) - Nays (0).' • . r
RICHARD ROWLETT 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE - LAKESHORE AND
STREET SETBACK
Van Nest moved, Dunlap seconded, that the Planning Coirmission
recommend to the Council approval of the Final Plat of the
Registered Land Survey of Pfdllip Dykstra with stipulation
added to the Plat that no easement be granted from Lot B to
the lake, if this procedure is found to be correct by the City
legal staff, or any other procedure advised by the legal staff
that would ensure this provision and also, thr.t approval be
subject to payment of the Paik Dedication Fee. Motion, Ayes
(6) - Nays (0).
PHILLIP DYKSTRA
3080 NORTH SHCXQ
FINAL PLAT
DRIVE
Hake moved, Hannah seconded, that the Planning Ccmmission re
commend to the (jouncil that the Final Plat of the Ulmer Ob
struction Conpany entitled "Ulmer Estates" be approved sU>-
ject to payment of the Park Dedication Fee as both parcels
exceed the minimum two acre requirement. Motion, Ayes (6)
- Nays (0).
UUER OGNSmJCri(]N GO.
70 8 190 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH
FINAL PLAT - UIACR ESTATES
The Zoning Administrator called attention to the Planning
Agency draft of the Multi-Family Ordinance that was schooled
to be reviewed with the Planner. He explained that John Bergley
had a family emergency earlier in the day and was unable to at
tend. The Commission tabled the review until their next regu
lar meeting.
MULTI-FAMILY ORDINANCE
At the Planning Comnission's request, John Lanbin appeared at
the woik session review of his application for a Conditional
Use Peimit for the purpose of constructing a Burger King Restau
rant at the present site of the Martins Texaco Station in
Navarre. The Zoning Administrator related, from his meetings
with Hennepin County personnel, that they would not permit any
egiess or ingress onto Couity Road No. 19. After some review,
however, the Gomty representatives agreed an access road from
County Road No. 19 to the Buiger King would be acceptable If
arr^ements could be made with the Calvary Memorial Chutth
JDHN LAMBIN (BURGER KING)
3340 SHORELINE DRIVE
iITICNAL USE PERMITM CI I
-.T■ J
MINlJrES OF A REGULAR PLANNING OOWaSSION MEEl’ING HELD APRIL 5, 1976 - PAGE 6The Conndssion revieMed the variance application of Everett S. Goodfelloiir, viho because of an existing non-confoiming use, >Aier^y his hooe had only a 6 ft. sideyard setback, requested
peimissibn- to build a 24* x 40* addition onto his house that
would meet existing setback requirements. He stated that the
garage at the site would be removed as soa n as constiuction
is inder way. It has been verified that the two lots owned
by Mr. Goodfellow ere conbined into one site. McDonald moved,
Hamah seconded, that the Plaming Goninission recomnend to
the Gouncil approval of the Everett S. GoodfblloRv variance
request as si£nitted but sii)ject to the old garage being re
moved from the site upon conpletion of the construction.
Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
EVERETT S. GOODFELLOW 3510 NOR3H SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE
Hake moved, Hannah seconded, that a Pii>lic Hearing be held at
at 7:30 P.M. on the 3rd of May, 1976, regarding the sid)division
application of Alan Sweetser for property on 845 Old Long Lake
Road. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
ALAN SIGTSER
845 OLD WtiG LAKE ROAD
SUBDIVIS™
Hake moved, Hamah seconded, that a Piblic Hearing be held
at 8:00 P.M. on the 3rd of May, 1976, regarding the subdivision
application of the 315 East Grant Corp. for property located
at 3340 Shoreline Drive. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
315 EAST GRANT CORP.
3340 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUBDIVISION
Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded, that the Plaming Commission
recomnend to the Oomcil that the variance application of Oli
ver McCurdy to build a garage addition onto his existing house
located at 1045 North Pam Drive be approved as submitted.
Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
OLIVER S. McCUREY
1045 mm ARM DRIVE
The Goninission gave their attention to the matter of a letter
from ti^ City of Plymouth asking vhether the Ci^ of Orono
would be interested in having utility services in conjunction
with a development going into the Plymouth area on Femdale
Road soutii of County Road No. 6. Van Nest moved, IXmlap se
conded, ^at the Pliuining Goninission recomnend to the Council
that they draft a reply to the City of Plymouth stating that
the City of Orono has no future plans to service that part of
Orono and that the City's long range plans, if the area is
sewered in the future, would be throu^ the Long Lake-Orono
Interceptor. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
CITY OF PLY^fXm^
UTILITY SERVICE - FERNDALB
Because Mr. Danield Lindsay did not return for the woik ses
sion part of subdivision/ITO application, the Commission
tabled the matter until the Public Hearing on April 19th so
that both the rezoning and subdivision/PRD matters could be
considered as a idiole. However, they did brief Mr. and Mrs.
Everett Schroeder concerning the proposal.
KELLY AVENUE HOLDING CO.
2505 KELLY AVENUE
SUBDIVISION 6 PRD
Hake moved, Hamah seconded, that the rrceting be adjourned
at 11:07 P.M. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
ADaouRr^#iT
0.
,v
-M
,1
1 \
» • ‘• f '■
•'t t f-
f ¥'•
• ‘ 1 4
i
I * *.tl
MW
WON
0
■y
I
1
Ccnditional Use and Vsurianoe Applicaticn yy LXAHON OP PBOPOSAL (or property) TYPE CF FBQUESTAddressLegal Description^APHJCMtt
H«e /ne^ojpA^
Address / /1/.5 _____
oracR
Nape //eJ^rt Phene »^ 7//j"//
Address 3,^ _____ _____
Present Zoning
___ Conditional UseVaurianoe • ^' i___ Wetlands Variance
A_l' Fee
i \«
FOR OETTCIAL USE a^LSf
Council action
Date
y.A'Present Use
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Reejuest
Sepcify Ordinance Requirements_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Approved
Denied
Eiqplain Request Relative to Requiranents
/?
M=L
LjuU
/CjtjJUj
Qctent of Won^oonf^it v — \^yLp ^ .__________
Rerdshipe to Propert y ^Ll-
/iH
METIERIAL IGCESSAIV FOR CaiPIfTE APPLICATION
(Must be subndtbed 1 week prior to Council Meeting)
1. Application ccnpleted
2. Plat Map Section
3. Survi^ (Sketch in proposal)
4.
owrgLJi wtaiiiFSoo rt.
5. 4dftsfifltrFee
Date 3-v4 - 7 ^/ *
Signature
7
>-c.
1
/
^ ^ ----
y
e^
:.i^v
/ilLajL. a^JL /yit^o
y \
^ #
OMyi^ J:'/Z^/C,■y
/
/A
/
/
/•\
y
\
rf •
.'*’ •
#111
/r. \
y'\t>■'K feJkai
\\J yAT^
8
’ *>:c/
,^A s
SSfk
\' m'S /
■
T / "
X ^ j/
>a» «i
___HA’.'fi 'i
'O >•
*'
\\A >
a\' •».VH
■41VJ
♦-5 f •'•V.
•S V^
V
<
<'
x'/.
X.
l<
^'i
X T-'''i'\y \ OiV
‘'•"A
'i'.
I \
\
.c?
-• #j
V'
V''
^rV'-'V'^"-V
V\T't'r''"'"
f'' A
^ /)!C€^ -
'j b f^C^^r-<bT
(o
X
./V^>'
:\
^,3
\n
W. R. Benscn
H. F. Muhich
April 19, 1976 #1 ]
SUBJECT:Vincent Johnson - 601 Minnetonka Highlands Avenue
Variance (34.452)
Mr. Johnson is requesting a variance from 34.452 for construction of a new
residence at this location. Legal description of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 9,
Minnetonka Stnmit Park. The 1975 tax book lists these lots as three separate
parcels and shows that 1974 taxes were delinquent.
The mininaim lot area for this zone is one acre. The three lots confined
^ual approximately 19,000 SF or .43 acre. All other zoning minimums are met
including lot width and setbacks shown for the proposed residence.
4 CITV OF OrO!JO, MJH'ESam Caniiitioncil Use and Variance Ap^^licati'
lOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Mdtess l-Y/ /ri,
'it 1 1jL -i-
TYPE OF RBQUESl’
_ _ Conditional Use
Variancelegal D^ription /I
j^PIUCAIir property acquired
Nsroe V > r- ' K *Pliane #: I
Address v 'V
CM'IER
time y^e Ptane «
Address
Present Zoning Present Use
Zoning Ordinance Section Itelating to Itequest J4.
l^tetlands Variance
■/ 7C" Fee
FOR OFFICIAL USE
Council action
Date
Approved
Denied
i.
Sepcify Ordinance Requirements /^'rcV •/ " . ^<•’ <
<• ■ /. .. ^
l^lain Request Relative to Raqairenents
r4te *‘w/^
Extent of I'ion-canfonnity
0
(X.C lC
. HMcdships to Property r,:/‘C:J//-d/.:,. ^ 5; ;i-, . .. ....
‘ III I ail I
k
METtERIAL NDCESSAKlf FOR CCHPIETE APPUCKTION
(i'4ist be submitted 1 week prior to Council iteeting)
Application ccnpleted
Plat Section
Survey (Sketch in proposal)
4. Abstractor's Certificate of Property
Owners Within -dea- Ft.
5. $30.00 Fee
Date 'i Signature
/ \
{1 ' f f. in ^ -.
Use
rianoe
i
' z
■»sr'
”» »•- ,
t i V:
«* .
s. '.
J'
I''?•;-■'
1 ,-!tf '
;-. .•;■
'•
\ .:
I i‘
\ Vi-.
cf ;K>tO I
n." t f* ■iii . ”ey
'Vr V' rKi: c. Ji‘’nst n
r, r.'Mc i, - oc ‘- V, Hlnncl vn'Ci Tiu^rdt *rVtr*.
l>3;jr»«r.in C'.'V'snl;', r.inj>"S'^ta
I El>*SIRFE"'
_f >
/ /
/ /
/ / m
\
«ja------
!, » ' -fA •>;
#: V.
! V
c«
•2
^ —y
/
it. .—
^\y
______
\\j
\ '\K' N”t - y I Xj V '!X K
1 1 - \
' ' •' \ \
\
\
!
/
*
X.
400 V.
---------
»i>c c»% 'x
N
/
MINNETONK HiGH LANDS LANF.
n.fr* i c.'. t'» r . rToy ;
T Vorebr ecrt; * V\i:i I-
^ r. I L( vr, ;. of '
fmar M. t)'..“ Ion :-i ■■I
n'’.C) c nt.'”.. Lin»''r '■Ar't'fi i;* ov r‘" ii. c .inu.c c’Mt.Nr ,
tiA' .‘•}’;ov.* P'io T'.' n* r , i '* riT*v,
^ \ X ^.
-i true i:.!’.i • n;-- (-.* "<;* r -or'• , ^,,, r
und ■ , • ’( ri: S , *'lj r..i- . r> ;*
l.uiif.l’ v>, t ?tT. y , '' .nY-ctr.,
It T'»..: f.ot Nurvcrt
-1 •.,
•* 15 n,
' . : Ct •,»! »» ^ s.* •1" * 4'! ’.
Jr/’r. n;
V:r:; n
I ‘
' •»».< •I . 4
I 4
& m
NAME
/DTK^
ADDRESS
7^ 4r2(^uO)
:/4
j2^jC.\}olK
ft
$ i
f±dfnjA o
JL l^CeN T nIoI-i
• txi V ’ \ *
>. c* * -ON ’•»-
• ^ S
• \.V % I
a IK
.. r- k
\C '.1
f 1501)
£iC.haflcl l-Ulialvf-.
A.M, Ida rcherf' ,
: - i
^ ♦
DESCRIPTION
/ r 5 7 7c" /3 z/'K^/l
/ I
C Id</s
/r-.V
Lcr-^J 4 /') c
/ylrKf!
(fl^f ayo. ‘4.j^o)
l/4A'bS ^ ;P^/?5
\"f’ f‘>^2Alesd Aen/h • t'*.
ii/?reAJ Potnjr /
(p/?r a/C. 4Cl&'c
-jame s d.Sp/ Ic/e.. -
^cS
fi^em / iJKn P
■ c'l' . "'■ ii*.
Z S 4,'cy I
iP/// r A’o. 4 ys5)
(>e Pt/fY .
IO'/~! i SC-Ct / 410 t/~C‘ /
)
5?
/
d?
j7^Ci.
JOO
/40C
'car/^or /p 4i4k
/4CKJ
» c-r- ' . t^ '•.
71 '••• •• * '
and f • * *'• “•
> '■ '
..............
.• t • ^
• •
I I
s\nrt *> •*.
»■
\ . ‘i
A.
0n\^:__
1
<^<r'c‘c
PARCEL
■^3-
4zr,
■i'CC
Jc::3;
S /Jc.
.JS
J730'
J<X>^/^oc
1
400
TO;W. R. Benson
FROM:H. F. MUhich
DATE:April 15, 1076
SUBJECT:Sheldon L. CXiast
Variance (31.109
iini(
j- 'fp -iy.
•«<: -
n
» I
''i
3
f
1 .
cm OP OHOND, MINNESaiTV Ccnditional Use and Viurianoe Applic(or property)«# 113fddxBsaJdj; I
T^l /f*' Slocj^ 2 ^l^gal DMCtiption Ay .,, /. a. =. ^ : /f/hk
muam
Mane z / . .
Date property acquired ^ 7 /. / 9:7V
r —T—•*’"
TifPE OP FBQUEST
____ Conditional Use
__^ Varianoe
____ Vtetlands variance
- y-^Fae / V' V ^
i
AMdbss
OMSR
.5-* C/y/7 ^ /I S A / ,.
Address
y
Phone «
Present Zoning /-f\'/Present Use /V‘, - //i ^
t; I . 7cT
Zoning Ordinanoe Section Delating to Request 7 y« ^
Sepcify Qcdinanoe Raguiremants y/ w
BOR OPFICOJ* USE ONLZ
Council action
Date
Approved
Denied
Qcplain ReqMest Relative to Rsauirenents c^('~
___ f ^ ^ ^ r 11^
— (■ ^Ty '<.cZl ^ C ♦ y *-1 ,<^.r -/y .
<rt^ u Vr ^ ^ ^y z'^?Ur A -' ^yvz:,
EMent of Mcn-oonfonnity Y <ri/cx%»c. f!^</ ^
XHardships to Property //
^ 7«-W <*y ,
r /fj-y^ -if' V y ^ i,/
X
MBIERIAL NBCESSAFDf FDR CCEfflfilE AFPUCAXION
(t4ist be subndttad 1 week prior to Oouncil Meeting)i
A|g>licatiGn oonpletad
Plat Map Section
Survey (Sketch in proposal)
4. Abstractor's Certificate of Property
Owners Within .^0^4>t. .^ / ^
5. 150.00 Ete----------------------------------
/ /
Signature^^^^y'^y^Xr.:-.^^
y
A 4. ,
1^'’
Use
9 S c *
—r-^
«./
'■ •;j.v^‘:|.T '• ■'
•^ . ^ ^ r* ,»r*. •«
» .*»*►•' •■‘•
" ' .
i .,
I ;?^':
.4 -i/, 'v/y
■ * » *' * . •
i‘n.-lt o!' Ji;;''/G' for .. '•.; l(!.' r ... • m -,^ c *or .>rti I -xtA •', .-.tori- r, "v.vti'o ^(».-ltion
ilo. nt. p,' t: Cour ty , i-.iriO- 3r ■# 113
■■ t-
BROOK STREET
'i
'* 1'
.
■. .•-.
■■ -‘^v ■•
•' \ ■;'! • .*v
■',, »* ’'k
a*>
\7S IS
■ri>'
4V
% ' ‘
t '•■
5 -.vr^;
i.1.'- •.. .
■
2S ^
rvt.fkcv^j f4
a i4««.c*r» •-*
ff(#
2 ’
gu-4.^« ;
t«p u* *
^ J
itfa I'j'
* ’ >'J
i.
f Vi
Cort-i'i r*:=i to r'O Sur ”’ov:
; hi-^Tvby c-orti y tlvat thi- ir a i.ruo .Mul r.crr'ict ruur'ji ont. *
of 0 survey of l-c. nonri«r of 3C7.s 1 «r..J :>, niocb .V, ’v, -si o
Atif’ttlion to )^!ko !'‘r;Ti.yt.cn-<o , Iho loo.u ticn o.’ all OKlstlr.i. Ivii /'liiir.'?
tbcrerr., '■‘tu; tS-« l.c* -sMoij nf ^ o. rcr.r . j aJ<]j‘:ior. x nn
t>xiv*\r,tr, t’iJlr!in . :t y,oer *ct pu!*-)ort t>/ o ’low e;.orc;,riu'i..‘ntr; 1''
m-% f
y •
'r'-\ \
I/' “ 30'
3-:'z-vb
■»«on r.-irV'^r
*
(icr-jri. .. Coffjn itn. . y.
r^ud jv^,y i‘i.Mr,n r
11
■■'J
.-■ ■■
I
' Mr
A
4 , A . •*.f* •
r-..ruJLiUt u
• < a-« c.»4nide> • f% > 1
1 crestview ,
' ;4fo i 1 >-^P75 /^ 4.
.‘VE 1
’>\’^N-^^> <r-s \
!jv> ^U.U Ot^ V St.. • .
' J
•
*»
1
(^5)
♦—1>- ■* J __.jtL ♦c
‘ f^:'J
K' .,
Mi
•J*1*
o
Tjinpi'-^’
I
h .
o
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
W. Pw Benson
II. F. Muhich
April 19, 1976
mM 1X
SUBJECT:Kem Hoppe, Robert Bathke and Christopher Dahl
2608 ^ 2610 Mapleridge Lane - Subdivision
The applicants are requesting approval of a sU)division consisting of property
line rearrangement. The existing house is on existing lot 19. Existing lot 8
is unbuildable because placement of a structure to meet the City setback lequiie-
ments (including 75 ft. lakeshore setback) viould locate it within an existing
private vision easement granted to Lot 19. Rearrangement of the lot lines
would protect the lakeshore view of the existing house while allowing construction
of the proposed residence. Rearrangement would meet all lot area, width, and
setback regulations on both proposed lots. A private driveway easement would
be required.
!
*r
n
f
\
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
Land Use ^plication
#d. 14
^(t
Fee ^ ,. /••
Date
? A
^vreet Location of Property: S a /V\i
Legal Description of Property: LdT R, LoT IfE/UN
Owner: KE^IJ '2.^\0 0
f WQuest: Re zoninc
H-1
Type o Re zoning
Variance
oftvt.
Conditional Use Peimit
Subdivision Approval
Other
Descriji^ion of Request: R E 7“ It
AUtO fy/i'Pv___4 7j-OiiSl
epr^ y 1- Ij S.;Rd>OA> j U O/tfifot/i
(Applicantl XOwnerT
Please draw or attach a sketch of proposed structure showing tl« following:
r
i:
1. Indicate North
^2. Location on Lot
3. Adjacent Street Names
4. Location of setback and use of adjacent
X, existing building.
5. Distances between any prqx)sed structures
and Structures on adjacent property.
6. Dimensions of proposed structure
7. Proposed setbacks
8. Zoning in force Ln tliis area
Exhibit Submitted:
Map or plat showing the property affec^'d and all lands v/ithin 300 ft. of the boundaries
or the property affected by proposed cXnge.
^stractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of tlie owners of
the land within 300 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting the change or rezoning
^^as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County.
Petition showing 50% of property oivners witliin 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance.
Village reconmendations:
:ait» ^ f~'Ajrn,»rL hi.’f
* Pick
rr\u* T. i\i I viiitunui l. i ^
NAME ADDRESS
7r_X_X f±
DESCRIPIION
LOT
RMSc/lff.Satrmardner ojCC/ yj i/c/A- i
Dfi/iold fi. LyiiitW
Verflo/t £., Tiul^u£
T.^Aowe Jn
fi.V. Podlogar
I'hy
C^Kp^Jj! ...
Prpce /c
V«rU00 £. ruku3
Cutfip R. Swc'/lsp/i
Donald fi- Lgr»R/1
____< / V
fMaaii J, tl^Uhd
l-Aliry ^kjet. .
KsilA-ff. O/ppp.^
Kt-Uk, rioppc ____
Cj// 0^ C^ror? P
RSC^ AR^P IZ. i
F/_/^T r^P,-4-30p?
<0 7"i«l/^r7l5 C f
BLK.
C'/o-'H' f> !> :Vi f
i^tDu^di cr-
'JXClrC f>'0 f< fYW N A/,
/Y. Z /.VX >’ i '1
t'/ CC'/'pi C t i'*'^ / / >/■ Y
fif.2.nrx y6:'.p
r/z/K! T /;
/7c/>t -r
TA'//<:!7 !:.>
Tf^M'' T p
$"ti ’■’ Ot (h•/!('h' fkP
T/i rrPf-l V.
UC-y /rlcf/c’ fx(p
'{>b !'P- U
i j .
}/C //( /'i/ .
({T, r (yi k .'('7 /?
rSCL-C-^'/r/k
i * .• : <
:y(zif7
cACCL.^>/Ct ‘Z A7/A/A/.
'I //
M/^r^-L:/ : u 't^ i -
c<cfJ~. /VVn-v. >*•.'.>■ ■;
rL P -r mck '^i3zzc
6
’ > . ^5 V /' /z
/■/‘ V ;/ /' / ^ >'
V - ^ M
•
>/
.'/• Z.^/
/^O f J f)!p^ /o//C>
/■ ^
tz r. 7: !< ./ /* •/ /!} ■
>Hi''r.C {I'I r V / ./ ‘ . .
// /V'x ^ v '• i>« ‘f'z
> •' •
(i»'. !
n ■■• •
*^i '\ .)
♦ ^ •
f’/ i
■V/
7 /; ‘f ZP
//.
//
/ p
Pf <■ / / r. / r.
z .A'/". •'^'- •/'■■/'.
< ''r Af/y .
A '» A V /
n (M r /c/‘ JLiZ f /?
z:z
» ..^ . ^m,.* '■ - •
r I
) ■
'«
\ «i
PARCE
^s/c
;^oo
^ a c
40 c
^Oc
3dLO .
0 40
3 00
'^0£Tl
;...«,. li
CARCE
zrt A
S'/C
<C>C
' OC
c
'5/LO
\gC
<tzs
K*;vi
i,;-v,»a---'fe vV- '■'. \
■.U:-‘l
i
%<sj
/C.
/
•at »7
U 0
J
1
1f <
I
t/
/
V.-.
$
¥
oi:“
V.
;■]
l'** H
i
■>5c>yf^
mSEO. ir,TJi7,R.23
Mttin ti*t fiir 4tM ••
wu9m
F
•m
!**Tgu6I0>»W»0 \^>
Mr,
( ■#
s
U,
^<1 /a ^ '"■''»•'> 4-
*' mt j#
■ Tr-, ~-~'=P=^
\
• 4'* +^7T>
•**
A
,w€r
NORT ^ERN
's " J
W.V*.'|#T
• I ■
UVINGSTON
<C5J
IT,le.l i9j*o.jt«. zz, z»
I I '
AVE
j«i 13■; ii'
• — - ♦-------
^ 4i 4 ir. 18
I I
8 7
I
to. Zi
$
t
4 5
♦ - -
I 1
/! ■-rA ‘A'>
^ rriANcr“ ROOM IIG, IOURTHOUSE MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 5541S
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
■fc-;
i
NAME
h •
ADDRESS
^J/ /)c/c// r/Ca/
DESCRIPTION
LOT BLK.PARCEL j
'X - / ' rL_____________.t:\.
>UP^ >0 / ""zme.
^dith
I 4 i .*<li£.T iO jElEltk
J
i I: ‘' Jr2l\ A ’ •: ‘L , —..-ia ^ ^-------------------
A .-/-if -f
_
0'A3Q.
KT./Jef^eA/ i>' i7i yic.dp
.//i ^ hi^QT.^ ^ '5 7
/ 4 r 5 5^jr_ 0^-2.
UC r.2) id'A ______
. 5-4/^:. /zT X. -5a
/>
.;/$/7>://
^70C
9 7<?0^. .
9^00
^ X •
j * ••: lui^.'.
^•’.•^. Cc Pr -.i ^/,.x
1 ^.aU . }.
1
I ___I------•*.
4
-4...-
i ■■
li. ’
mf<i ,
*. M ■■
iLv
m . ''T?^ I »'«'>.
> ' '
1 / 7*
■i V'*>:
f, I
i'V' I'
I:|i,c-*’
.-V
■• j. ' r''N *
i Jw'.’ > *. Jf
/Tj''4iv
V .-j*’
i
ifc'irJk. ^
i
; 'I "IHf,.\ft
;.'•' ‘A-' - i
(* -
mM'i
^••^. y
1| «., , A/A/ ■
1^
nr.'
f ft
»• Sv. j:
■ \ r''
<j.:-
VN
\\\
li* f t: •
J '
0W'-
rji’
./%«'
'TZ'-
fitP
\V “
v£' ‘' >
\ s i.>
V
■"
< ^
t"
Vi •’]
'A'
'■•■ra,¥l-
'I %K^./-«-
f ■1.
« • « ^^4 «• • *«»%i . *«. ^ »*.%.%•%
T
s % i
i
>
'4 ^
/*■! ¥
\^'^r * w»r.
' ■ i
'' f
\ *V '
*> w •• »
^ * -l^- >» W »w '
^ ^ .. > k
A'
¥il a t.
'i ■ 5.
f V,I; ■ ^ -4
I
|r .
{^-
f
m 'ft'r#'‘
I
P?iS'Ti. (* S.fsl
llv
*t ■ :i,f5 - ..'.li
. '■•■ _ >
■ •■ ; ,''
m
s-
/
x:-# , ,. ¥
‘ r »■
f;'■ • ■■
It
If . /I ', lt I'j
\'- ■ ' t ^ 'f -‘/ ^ I . U'. t
TO>‘'-
♦ /. 'l^'s
W' ^ i r
H tf ''••I'
^ ■■ :A -^‘
fsam%» i'
-f*; I
;.*. . .t\ .
"lb .'«t-.l’fi • n ■'i* ■ vMi • .
‘■'Ury}):
•' I > »
’■• . 5.3r^
W. R. Benson
H. F. Muhidi
April 19, 1976
m
#11 a
David G. Opheim - 1430 Cherry Place
Variance (31.380, 34.452 and 38.201)
Ophe^ is requesting variances from these sections for construction of an
18 ft X 26 ft. (468 SF) addition to his existing 21.7 ft. x 21.5 ft (467 SF)
garage. Total proposed structure area is 935 SF which is below the 1,000 SF
mxim size. Variances are required because the existing garage is non-con>
fbratog as follows; Front yart setback 1.7 to 2.2 ft (35 ft front yeard itsq’d
2 rS?’® 1°®” opening on the street), side yard setback 3.9 ft
(10 ft »q d). The doors of the new addition will open into the lot. Tlie new
addition will not reAice the existing sideyard setback. All neighbors listed
on the abstractor's certificate have signed a petition of aopioval.
• t.
'.i
f.p-t
t'
‘-a
. ■li "’
p:-4 ‘4i
i-»mm-' ^vt
i
.y .'I
t»
v‘
i I
Conditional Use md^SSee^lication
OP PICPQSAL (or property)
Aildzess
4
I«gal Oascription
Date property acquired June 6, 1975
- - -David G. Opheim Phone < 471 -7884
^^dxmas 1430 Cherry Placp
OftIBR
**“ Ptoe i 471-7884
i^ddzess Same
______________Present Use Res
#11
OP IGQUEST
____ Oondltional Ute
- ^ Variance
- Wetlands Variance
(3D
TOR OFFICIAL USE ONL^
Council action
Date
Approved
Denied
Zoning Otdinanoe Section Relating to Bsquest 34.452_________
Sepci^Qpdinanoe Raguiranants_.Street setback - 35'. . iq.
EKplaln Raciest Hslative to Ragulranents___________
a^hown on attached drawing: n ew portion of structure requires varianre nf IP «'
Ln street setback and 6.1' in side setback
»
Bctent of aen~oonfanlty_Original structure does not conform to current criteria but is
in.good shape and appearance. Addition will nearly conform to existing req.
*********^ to Ptoperty
mtistantial f<n and additional hardcover. See attached drawing for detail, in addition.
2£t.1.y conform would require additional structure.
plication ocnpleted
2. Plat Map Secticn
3. Survty (Sketch in ora
4. Abstractor's Certificate of Prooertv
Oncers VJithin 300 Ft. ‘
5. $30.00 ^pe J\
Date
Signature
1
4
•. ‘.r-
: .. '
•:\
>• *v ,
«•
♦.
% * • *■
• ■ * K
1 • **
* ■
t *V •
>•
• .<2^.
‘V
r>y A ■
j'a'.
: r.■sm.
I’ 'v-
■
;Vl. ?!W ••irM
< .* ‘fy.
(
/V
I
r‘fV • .
W. \%rii
K 0^f>eim
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ROOM 116, COURTHOUSE MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55415
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST/51P Lie
NAME ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION
onofJo
ctvis^r/9z.. Bj9'f \ft^w
fUtr MO, ^ZLT C
6c!fe/ .....j/■^P’<? cherry P/of'C’
ilitllfK K.IAiS^jSk |K/', / £V’x Mcidi/mim> •
ftktoncf (ninn. s’s;34t^
5zj Op/icifTf^
Cztety M.\/Jo/l^
/ft ij^ j 4
G/M^-dobnsc/7
-Bj)jULcobso/f
Jirihut e,ffhl»^r)
/Y\QMi)d /ri*njy,
*f ff
1/
M 0f ___%f if
lii^P Cheiry Ctc/cr
/ i-bo. •*____
i^7C ___ "
f^i^ C'h^ny Pbcc' .Yo\£llcf jYiaU^r__/^"Tb / f
fsjii I (bcK itXoanci
3cK 4^^ /Y\ciO\(/
f7i< Cherry fh(^(' i|)7oi//r//Vf/-^>/’.
MiTC Chwy i^^oLcnd m,ftn
LOT BLK. PARCEL
SA&
/tlnl/l •
*? ft/C-L. f^£MtS£.P
P^-»r MO. -^3/2.0
Btvde M,li-mfer Ifzjt. / acK -tc? mou tf\/Jt/1 r
I cirrl’V th-rt fr H rt*
on Vu . :t. . I f '. .*fi -s. * V. ...»
•Md4ni4$ fw*u;<uai>Ui iiiJUX.ct kitonc^m
u
zo7r
S’ \ ztre.^
* -1
3e>’3>0
M'T-VCVW.'
il \
\
\
‘ I
I
I
ii
» 4
\
\
«
I
C'4
0o
oo
I
^ i
*
O;x
I
/
/
/
/
/
tI
______i
•sr
A
F '.^-c -
.o ? ‘ J;?
I 1
if
\J
r>i#-
♦ %r»r
m:
w. A
*‘«' ' lA'4s
! {') I T /pi' ']n.< a ,'
•' ^ V V; !*-'’/ ('- ,' ! ’i '', •• ^ — I - • b j '; ' !
'• /1J I I
AP-• /
•‘1>•
April 8, 1976
CITYOf^
PLYMOUTF+
V ! L. L./ \ (-J p (j}- Q i >( j p.j^ )
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553?3
Re: Mooney Lake Study (Project No. 514)
Gentlemen:
The City of Plymouth has recently submitted a petition to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District requesting that a study be made of the Mooney Lake Drainage Basin. This
study would be necessary to determine the feasibility of an outlet for Mooney Lake.
This petition was the result of a meeting with the Watershed's engineers prompted by
high lake level complaints from residents in Plymouth, Orono, and Medina.
.1
In submitting said petition, the City Council's resolution indicated that they felt
the City should not pay the entire cost of the report inasmuch as other communities
have area within the drainage basin. In accordance with the Watershed's attorney, the
interpretation of the watershed law indicates that the petitioner will assume all cost
of the preliminary report in the event the project is not ordered. When advised of
this situation, the City Council did not feel that this was an equitable way of handling
the costs of the report that they had petitioned for.
In reviewing the total acreage within the Mooney Lake Drainage Basin, it appears that the
City of Plymouth has about 37%, Orono 46% and Medina 17%. The City of Plymouth is
willing to pay their proportionate share of the cost of the report. In a recent letter
to the Watershed District, the City suggested that if the Watershed District fund 1/3
of the cost, the other 2/3 could be spread among the municipalities based on the
percentages outlined above. We would appreciate it if you would review this proposal
and would solicit your comments. The City of Plymouth is willing to share in the
funding of the report, but does not feel it is equitable to have to fund lOO^ of the
cost.
If you have any questions regarding the matter, please contact the undersigned at
559-2800. Because residents in your community living on Mooney Lake have expressed an
urgency in this matter, we would appreciate an early response.
Yours, very truly,
/ / * • .1'
Ala. . ;
Sherman L. Goldberg, P.E.
Director of Public Works
SLG/dg
cc: John Spaeth,Councilman
Jim Willis, City Manager
I ; • »iM' n
milt