Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-01-1976 Planning Packeti i I I..k r’: • I i^i^ r-i fi- F ♦ v':-f •'» ■.< .j 5 .’^j:»»* ’• •** o T > AGENDA PLANNING CO^^!ISSIGN MEETING OF MA»>'I1 1, 1976 ORONO CITY MALL * 7:30 P.1'1. I.CURRENT ITI?tS i f ■M Ji \ A.Action Items 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. #95 - Public Hearing - Fred Lucas - 2055 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 17, 1976 #32 - Scott Property - 2060 Slioreline Drive - Final Plat #85 - Quentin Johnson, etal - 3535 Ivy Place - Subdivision (Preliminary) and Alley Vacation #90 - Dale McCurdy - 4041 North Shrre Drive - Final Plat #94 - Stii)bs Bay Marina Cafe - 3445 Bayside Road - Renewal of Conditional Use Permit #97 - A. T. Esco - 300 Crestview Avenue - Street Vacation (Set Public Hearing) #99 - Wayzata Yacht Club - Big Island - Renewal of two existing Conditional Use Per. .*ts B.Work Session Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. #96 - Kenneth W. Oien - 2980 Casco Point Road - Subdivision (Preliminary) #98 - David J. Kruskopf - 1200 Wildhurst Trail - Variance Lot Width and Area #100- Tom Giere - 350 North Aim Lane - Subdivision (Preliminary) #101- Daniel Lindsay/IDS Properties - 2505 Kelly Avenue - Rezoning MfC Busing - Navarre Area C.Incomplete It«ns (StaCi*«5) II.COMPLETED ITEMS FOR COUNCIL A.Open Items 1.#86 - Ski Tonka - 4680 Bayside Road - Conditional Use Peimit B.Convicted Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. #92 #58 #81 #88 #90 Super Value Stores - 3333 Shoreline Drive - Approved rezoning A1 Miitman - 1540 Sixth Avenue North - Subdivision - Concurred Vincent Johnson - 1376 Park Drive - Variance - Concurred Anna T. Holter - 2705 Wavzata Boulevard - Si#>division - Concurred Dale McCurdy - 4041 North Shore Drive - Preliminary Subdivision Concurred 6.#94 - Stubbs Bay Marina Cafe - 3443 Bayside T oad - Conrarred on one Month extension of existing Conditional Use Peimit ritn««nM ifenfci#Bi<air.ir.irTfln ~^i!amm J >/S I flAK/MTS CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA REGULAR PLANNING CafRSSIQN MEETING MELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman C. Paul Pesek. ^fembers Guthrie, Woolley, Dunlap and McDonald. Chaiiman Pesek announced that this was tlie time and the place for a Public Hearing to subdivide Lot 75 of Spring Park Addition and vacate the alley adjacent to Lots 72, 73, 74, 75 and 76. The Zoning Administrator read the Notice of Public Hearing and presented the Affadavit of Publication. The request came about at the desire of Allen Doubldee, who recently purchased Lots 73 and 74 from Quentin Johnson, the present oivner of Lots 72, 75, 76 and part of 77. ^1r. Doubldee» a builder, recently applied for Building Permits on his two substandard lots and, rather than apply for a variance, made an agreement with Johnson to purchase part of Lot 75, vhich is also substandard. The oivners wuld conbine the divided lot and the proposed alley va­ cation to increase their lot size to conform to the present zoning code. The Chaiiman noted that the City Attorney had ad­ vised that the City could only vacate an alley if it were in the public interest to do so. Mr. Frank Buysse, representing him­ self and three neighbors who were h'illiam R. Berg, George Jenos and M. D. Barrett, expressed their objection to any type of variance to add building sites in the area. In addition, he presented the following two letters: (Dated February 14, 1976) I the undersigned George Jenos ouner of the property at 3030 Casco Point Road am opposed to any va­ riance of building zone requiranents and to opening the road off Ivy Place for ecological reasons. Frank Buysse has my proxy on these and other matters that may be brought before the Orcxio Council concerning property adjoining Ivy Place or \d.th­ in legal influence of same. Signed: George Jenos. (Dated February 12, 1976) I the undersigned, William R. Berg, owner of the property at 3516 Ivy Place, Casco Point, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota, am opposed to any variance of Building zone requirements and to opening up theroad off Ivy Place for ecological reasons. Frank Buysee of 3534 Ivy Place has my proxy on these and other matters that may be brought before the Orono Council concerning property adjoining Ivy Place or within legal influence of same. Signed: V/illiam R. Berg. i The other neighbors attending the Public Hearing, namely Robert Bartikoski, Arthur Jewett, James Lovestrand, John Honour and flichael Hirsch, were opposed to the petition if it would ada more homes to the area and because the narrow road would generate additional traffic problems. No one voiced objection to the vacation of the alley except if it would create a ne­ cessity to open Maple Lane in the future. Mr. Doubldee ex­ plained that two houses on the three lots would l)e more de­ sirable than the possibility of three houses. Tlie Zoning Ad­ ministrator expressed his view that he would er. ,ourage pro­ posals that generate larger lot sizes, notiiig that what was originally 5 1/2 lots would now be three lc‘*'s. The Chairman closed tlie hearing after all tlie public were afforded an op­ portunity to be heard. ATTENDANCE - 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING QUENTEsI JOHNSON, ETAL ALLEY VACATION § SUBDIVISICN MINUTES OF A PLANNING CH^^USSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 2. Chairman Pesek announced that this was the tune and place for a Public Hearing on the subdivision application of Dale McCurdy. The Zoning Administrator read the Notice of Public Hearing and presented the Affadavit of Publication. Mr. ^fcCurdy explained that he was the present owner of Lots 7 and 8, Highwood Addition, and that he would like to enlarge his existing tract, for the purpose of putting an addition onto his home, by purchasing 11 ft. of the adjoining Lot 9 from Bill Sime, homestead owner of Lots 9 and 10. Although both lots would still be less than 1/2 acre, each parcel was already oc^ied by a home and would pro­ vide Mr. McCurdy the necessary side yard setback. !ir. Simes felt that the proposal was beneficial in that four lots would become only two building sites. After all the public present were given an opportunity to be heard the hearing was closed. Chaiiman Pesek announced that this was the time and place for for a Public Hearing on the subdivision application of Anna T. Hoi ter. The Zoning Administrator read the Notice of Public and presented the Affadavit of Publication. The entire parcel under consideration for subdivision is presently being purchased under Contract for Deed by Van Dale, Inc. In order to obtain a mort­ gage, for the purpose of building an addition onto the existing Van Dale Structure, the two parties agreed to transfer title on a portion of the existing tract until such time that the remain­ der is paid. No objections were voiced concerning the proposal. After all the public were given an opportunity to be heard the hearing was closed. Chaiiman C. Paul Pesek called to order the regular Planning Commission Meeting of February 17, 1976. Guthrie moved, Woolley seconded, that the Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting held February 2, 1976, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Guthrie moved, Dunlap seconded, that the Planning Commission reconiT*end to the Council that the Preliminary Plat of Anna T. Holter for 2705 Wayzata Boulevard be approved as submitted. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Dunlap moved, Guthrie seconded, that the Planning Commission reconwend to the Council approval of the preliminary lot re­ arrangement and combination as submitted in the Dale McCurdy application. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). The Commission proceeded to discuss the subdivision proposal Of Quentin Johnson. Pesek felt thai recommendation should be made that the alley be sold. Thi? nei^bors again spoke up to present their view that they were against t\>ro houses on small frontage and density of traffic on the long, narrotv road leading to the area. The applicant’s felt that the lots would - 7:55 mPUBLIC HEARING DALE NfcCURDY 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING - 8:05 PM ANNA T. HDLTER 2705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUBDIVISION CALL TO ORDER - 8:12 RI APPROVAL OF MINUTES MEETING OF 2/2/76 ANNA T. HOLTER 2705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUBDIVISION DALE McCURDY 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE SUBDIVISION QUENTIN JOHNSON, ETAL 3535 IVY PLACE SUBDIVISION 6 ALLEY VACATION MINUTES OF A PLANNING (XH^IISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 3 be consistent with others in the area. Dunlap moved, Woolley seconded, tiat the application of Quentin Johnson, etal, be tabled until the next Planning Commission Meeting so that the Conuiission viould have time to view the site. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0j. The Conmission proct 'ded to review the data on the Vincent Johnson application for variance of lot area and width for pro­ perty located at 1376 Park Drive. Frank Lane and George Polta, nei^boring property owners, came forward to voice their ob­ jection to the proposa"^ due to the encroachment of a proposed structure to an existing dwelling and because the tract is lo­ cated on a hazardoiis comer and would create a visual obstruc- ticm to drivers. After the Conmission reviewed the tax and special assessment status of the pr^erty, IXihlap moved, Guthrie seconded, that the Planning Commission recommend to tlie Council denial of the Vincent Jdinson application because of the exces­ sively small size of the lot and their feeling that a 29 ft. variance was to great. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) - Abstain (1) McDonald. Frederick Herfurth, representing A1 Whitman, appeared with the Final Plat for the property at 1540 Sixth Avenue North. He noted that there had been a small change by moving thc^ rigjit-of-way. After review, Dunlap moved, Guthrie secOTided, that the Planning Commission recommend to the Council that the Final Plat of the Registered Land Survey of A1 Whitman be approved upon receipt of the Park Dedication Fee. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Guthrie moved, Woolley seconded, that the Planning Commission table the application for renewal of the Stubbs Bay Marina Cafe's Conditional Use Permit until the Planning Commission meeting of March 1, 1976, and instructed the Zoning Adminis­ trator to request the presence of Jin McCleary, Bruno Burak and Orono Police Chief, Mel Kilbo, to appear and insure that the cafe will be operated according to the Resolution and City ordinances and recommend to the Council that the present Conditional Use Permit application be extended for a one month period, ^foticn, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). The Commission acknowledged the receipt of a copy of a letter dated February 10, 1976, from Samuel S. Marfield which read as follows: (Dated February 10, 1976) Addressed to Hank f4i)iich, Building and Zoning Director, 'fhis letter is anotlier of the series of coiranurdcations between the City and myself concerning the con­ struction of ny home at 2455 Scotch Pine Lane. Hopefully, it will be the last. As a r eface to nr/ ]etter, J I'ouJ i like to tell you something about"myself and my attitude towards tlie lave. I was bom in this aiea and have always lived on or close to the lake. Diis QUENTIN JOHNSON, cont. VINCENT JOHNSON 1376 PARK DRIVE VARIANCE - LOT V/IDTH 6 LOT AREA AL WHITMAN 1540 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH FINAL PLAT STUBBS BAY ^ARI^lA CAFE 3445 BAYSIDE ROAD RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SAMJEL S. MARFIELD 2455 Scotch Pine Lane MDOTES OF A PLANNING OMIISSIO^ ^€ETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 4. nt. nm\ ane 4 1 is my third house on the lake and have lived right on the lake the last 10 years, enjoying its beauty and charm. I enjoy sit­ ting and looking at the lake, its trees, and its v;aters. I like fishing, boating, and just watching the world pass by in front of my house. I think the lake is a wonderful asset and si ould be protected with all efforts. Many of my relatives and friends live on the lake. I believe that their rights along mth mine and the general public should be preserved and protected. I do not wish to harm the lake and do not believe I have done so. I do not intend to haim it in the future, and do not think that anyone else should be allowed to. 1 believe in your ordinances and thinlc they arc good and bene­ ficial to the lake. At no time have I attacked the constitu­ tionality of the ordinance nor have I tried to strike it down in any way. I believe, however, that you did not apply it properly in my case. I believe that ^en an ihdividual comes in with a legitimate request for a variance which is properly engineered by a ccmiTCtent and respected engineer that a thorough and proper consideration to that request should be given. Your City en­ gineer also thought % request was a '‘legitimate request for a variance". The work which I did and as nav exists folloivs my Proposal I. My engineer's assessment of that change was ". .the net change in grading should be beneficial in that slopes will be reduced and covered with vegetation, thus allowing the slower, better quality run-off". The City engineer gave general con­ currence to this. I believe that the City's objection to Pro- pvysal I was that, even though the run-off is slower, that this advantage might be off-set by the ncreased water which would run to the lake. I then submitted Proposal II. This proposal shewed no "new" water running to the lake. It showed a new point in the law in front of my walt-out which was in the same general location as the old high point, ^^y engineer's assess­ ment of Proposal II was as follows. "The area draining directly to Lake Minnetonka is unchanged fron existing conditions. How­ ever, slopes have been reduced which will result in better qua­ lity run-offs. The remaining area will drain as now to the ad­ jacent marsh prior to entering the lake." Again, the City En­ gineer gave general concurrence to this. This Proposal was also rejected by the City. Proposal III which is being submitted with this letter establ­ ishes the same general drainage pattern shown in Proposal II. Both Proposals call for the cutting of trees over 6". Pro­ posal I called for the cutting of 3 trees. Proposal II for 2. Only 2 trees over 6" were cut, as there were no other trees over 6" in the excavated area. The City has stated that the cutting of the two trees was detrimental to tlie lake. I do not agree. I have some 50 trees along my lake shore and cannot believe that the loss of 2 trees could be detrimental. Since the steep slope has been removed, where these trees were standing, it would seem that the trees are now unnecessary. Regardless of whose opinion prevails, I am offering to plant 9 new trees. SAMJEL MARFIELD LETTER, cent. rER, PLANNING CatUSSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976,- Page 5. The history which leads up to now is as folloivs. May 30, 1974. Lot purchased from DiCon. June § July of 1974. Coramunicsted with Dexter ^^arson, City Planner, about ny proposal to remove part of the bank. He wasn’t sure \diat regulations affected my proposal, but told me I must apply to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and to the Minnehaha Creek Water Shed District before the Village would con­ sider my proposal. I spent a long time attempting to find out hoiv to get peimission from these t^vo agencies, only to find that they hai*. no jurisdiction over my proposal. It took Mr. Marson awhile to be convinced, but aft'sr several weeks he agreed with me. It was about this time that Mr. Marson left the City of Orono. July - August, 1974. Was told to deal with Mike Scheller, Orono Building Inspector. He also was not sure which ordinances con­ trolled my application and told me to talk to Mr. Malkerson, one of the City’s attorneys. Mr. Scheller has also left the City of Orono. August 13, 1974. Talked to ^h•. Malkerson about my application r i.'he said to mail him the survey so that he could understand what I was asking for. The survey was mailed that day. Au^st 28, 1974. Talked to Mr. Malkerson on the phone. He said that my application fell under ordinance #167-31.700. He also explained that there was a new proposed code being prepared and that it xvould be effective in 6 to 8 months. SAMUEL MARFIELD LETTER, cont. September 16, 1974. Proposal I. rejected by the Planning Con»- mission. Septemb^er 25, 1974. Sent letter to Mr. Malkerson asking for ^All of the rules \diich govern this 75’ area". October 1, 1974. Received the rules from Mr. Malkerson. Label­ led as Exhibit *'A" was an ordinance dated June 28, 1974, 31.700 and 31.705. 31.710 was not included. 31.710 said, among other things, "the requirement of Section 31.700 are not intended to govern the normal and customary grading in the area of....newly constructed building. .—any unusual eartii filling or removal of grading shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Planning Commission..." I believe since the grading was shown on the building permit and was also evident from the design of the house that this section of the ordinance would have exempted me from having to apply for a variance. It was the Building Inspector’s responsibility to refer any "unusual" work to the Planning Commission. Apparently, he did not think that the work was unusual since he did not refer it to them. The newly pro­ posed ordinance was also enclosed as Exhibit "B". October 16, 1974. Proposal li'. was submitted to the Planning Commission and rejected. November 1, 1974. My attorney, Donald J. Fraley, sent a letter to Mr. MalKerson explaining the reasons why the proposals should LETTER, MINUTES OF A PLANNING uOMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 6. have been accepted. No written reply was received to this letter. July 18, 1975. A ticket was issued. January 23, 1976. Received a letter from you (Mr. Muhich), idiich essentially said the following: a. Grade the excavated area such that all of the water that used to run to the swamp will again run to the swamp. b. Plant a number of trees. January 27, 1976. My attorney and I met with several Village officials at the Wayzata Court House. February 2, 1976. Received another letter from you (Mr. Muhich) stating in more deteiil your restoration requirements. I have read your February 2nd letter and agiee to its concept, and agree to do the following: a. Regrading. 1. There will be at least a 2% grade from the location of the old berm which has been removed to the marsh located to the east of the property line. 2. A berm will be constructed at the location of the old berm, vhich was removed, which shall be high enough to effectuate the 21 grade. There shall be no excessive cutting or filling on the property except as necessary to effectuate the terms of this letter and there shall be no additional cutting and filling except for that shown on the plan attached hereto. I will prior to any excavation or filling on the pro­ perty, place hay bales along the lake near the location of the berm which was previously removed and along tlie marsh to prevent sedimentation run-off into the lake and marsh during the disturbance of the earth. These bales whall not be removed until completion of the earth excavation and filling and after the sodding of the en­ tire area. All cutting, filling and grading is to be completed with in a 72-hour time period and I will give Hank ^^uhich 24 hour notice prior to the commencement of construction and shall notify Hank Muhich of its completion. 6. All areas of my property disturbed by the filling, ex­ cavating or grading will be sodded witliin four hours of the completion of said filling, excavation or grading. 7. Any swale or otlier formation leading to the marsh will be at least ten feet in width. 3. 4. 5. SAMUEL MARFIELD LETTER, cont. r"'MINUTES OF A PLANNING 00^^4ISSICN ^CETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 7. ETTER,8. The cutting, excavating, filling and grading pursuant to the plan will not be changed in the future without prior council approval. B. Tree Planting 1. I will plant three grotping of nursery stock birch trees, with three trees per groining, within 14 days of the placement of the sod on the property. Each tree will be at least one inch in diameter, measured 6" from the ground, and at least ten feet tall. I will guarantee the health of these trees for one year and will not cut them down for as long as I own the property. 2. The approximate locations are set forth on the plan. I believe that the enclosed plan gives sufficient detail for you to understand the proposal. The contour in Section B-B is not to scale and has been exaggerated to show the concept of the woik. The actual final contour v/ill be more level, but will still adhere to the minimum 2% grade. 22 sets have been provided and 4 are signed. All of this work is contingent upon my obtaining permission from my 2 neighbors to disburb their properties. I am concerned that the City might continue to prosecute me under the various ordinances which control the 75 feet next to the lake. If I perfoim the restoration work I am proposing and spend a lot of money and time doing it, 1 must be absolutely certain that no further prosecution will occur because of the work I have perfoimed to date in that area. I must also be cer­ tain that no prosecution will be made for the work \diich I will do next sumner vdiich is shown on the enclosed engineering plan. I propose to have all of this work ccm^leted by July 31, 1976. The trail would be continued until shortly after that date. I will furnish you with a certificate from my engineer, Hickok, that the work has been performed in general conformity to the attached plan. IVhen that certificate is received by the City, that will end the prosecution. I really do not want any more City officials entering my pro­ perty. My wife and child are upset and nervous enough already because cf tho intrusions of all these strangers. I want to give them the protection that I should be able to give on my own private property. This is not a demand, but a strong re­ quest to leave us alone to live in peace and quiet. Signed; Samuel S. Marfield (End of Letter). % Although unable to attend this meeting, Meiiber Brad Van Nest sulxnitted a letter concerning his view of the Marfield pro­ posal and it read as follows: (Dated February 13, 1976) In reviewir the information you have provided for our Planning Comnission meeting February 16, I came across the letter from Samuel ^!arfield and the drawing prepared by Eugene Hickock and Associates. Apparently SAMUEL MARFIELD LETTER, COTlt. MINiniS OF A PLANNING COMMISSION ^€ETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1976 - PAGE 8.^R, t'M m this is the infoimation provided by them showing what they are going to do to rectify the illegal grading and tree removal that took place last spring. In looking over the information provided I have the following comnents: 1. On Page 3 of his Februaiy 10 letter I think he has offlited one rather important date which must have been sometime between November 1, 1974 and Jiily iS, 1975. This would be the oate at which time the grading end tree removal actually took pldee which was done by ^fr. Marfield without a permit from die Village. 2. It would be my recommendation to the Village Council that pursuant to any agreement with Mr. Marfield that he must agree to have this work done under the direct supervision of both yourself (Mr. Muhich) and our Village Engineer. 1 would fjpel that it would be reasonable that We be notified prior to the work being done at least 2 days and that we be allowed access to the property both before, during and after the wotk has been accomplished so that we caii detemine what the condition of the property is before and after the wotk has been dOne ih ordet to assure the Village that the problem caused by Mr* Marfield has been adequately rectified. 3. Pertaining to the drawing by Hickock and Associates, I find that the scale to vdiich the drawing has been made is totally insufficient. The plan view lieed only show the immec late area where the grading is to take place but it should be drawn to scale of not less thai 1*'*10' so that we can determine exactly what he plans to do. I also notice on Section bB that there is a notation made that that section at least is hot even drawn to scale. Certainly any information that is provided on this drawing must be drawn to scale if it is to have meaning to us at all. I do not believe that the drawing need to show the con­ tour and plan view of the entire Dicon subdivision as does the drawing by Hickock dated February 3, 1976. It certainly would be sufficient only to show the area that is being changed. The one thing that ccnccms me about this proposal is that Mr. Marfield is alleviating his illegal action by doing more of the very thing that we are trying to prevent with our Ordinance that is disturbing the land masses surrounding the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. In other words we are allowing Mr. Marfield to clear himself of a grading violation by doing even more grading within the 75* protected area. I am not all sure that this ac­ tion is in the best interest of the Village. Signed: Brad Van Nest (End of Letter) The Planning Conmission concurred with the Van Nest letter and stated that they still held the opinion that Mr. Marfield should con^ly to the previously stipulated Village requirements. Guthrie moved, Woolley seconded, that the meeting be adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). SAMJEL MARFIELD VAN NEST LETTER, cont. ADJOURNMENT j , cont. FKOV: DATF: Dick Hank #95 February 5, 1976 Fred Lucas - 2055 6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) Mr. I.ucas is requesting approval. oT the preliminary subdivi­ sion proposal of the 4,4 acre parcel ?/^600) located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of County Road f/6 and Bro\\Ti Road, This area is zoned RR - Hi - (2 acre minimum area), l5oth proposed parcels (A and B) would exceed the mir.i'rium require­ ments of 87.120 square feet are.M and 200 feet minimum lot width, (Parcel A - 129,000 square feet plus and 247 feet wide. Parcel B - 126,000 square feet plus and 270 feet wide.) The Planning Commi.ssion has scheduled a public hearing on the proposal for 7:30 p,m., Monday, March I, 1076. *1V : u f ■’ I ^Public Works 935-3381 i»l 1».v L -V / //- If 320 Washi ngton i^.SouttfJhlopkins. Minnesota 55343 'Oiliri;-- ■■i / ‘Jb vM/ I . I r% I ' f I ! - 7 ^L/iJ ^ / VIILauc Oh 0H0r40 HeNNGRN COUNTY November 14, 1975 Mr. Henry Muhich Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Muhich: K*. 1 RE:Proposed Plat - "Hartzell's Lake Addition" CSAH 15 - West side north of Areola bridge Hennepin County Plat No. 389 Review and Recommendations Please be reminded that by State law all plats that abut a County road must be submitted to the County Engineer for review and recommendations prior to receiving final municipal approval. We have reviewed the proposed plat and have the following recommendations: 1.Dedicate enough additional right of way from and along the centerline of CSAH 15 to maintain an 80 foot right of way corridor through the plat. 2.Access from the plat to CSAH 15 should be limited to one road. However, it is recommended that the existing access point be maintained rather than constructing the new access point 185 feet south, as proposed. All lots must have access to the internal road rather than direct access to CSAH 15. 3. Access from the Douglas Head property across Outlet A to CSAH 15 should be limited to the Head property only. 4.All access to CSAH 15, whether new or revised, will require an entrance permit application. Entrance permit form- can be obtained from our Traffic Section. 5.It is highly recommended that construction of docks on the outlets between CSAH 15 and Lake Minnetonka be discouraged. Existing conditions along CSAH 15 (high traffic volumes, poor sight distance, etc.) in the area of the proposed plat, are such that any additional pedestrian traffic crossing CSAH 15 would be hazardous to both the motoring public and the private dock owners/users. hlinorWes. Woiften ana Other Protected Classes are Encouraged to app!/ lor En'ployrnent at Hennepin County ■I* sziiani V;. .. — » ’ ^ ^ • * > ‘ r ^ ^ VT' Hemiy Muh1<0 2 *1 < 1 >» V V.' •. \ 14. 1975 ■ i,. :.-:5 .t- .fv> vc.- 6. All piropo4^ construction or alterations, Includine drainage revisions, within County right of way must t>e approved by the Maintenance Section, Hennepin County Department of Public Works. vff He would appreciate your response and Intentions regarding the above stated recomnendatlons at the earliest possible date. Please direct your response and/or questions to Craig 0. Spencer at this office. Sin •i? V-” n»V • » * < • ^ ........ I 1 v‘* Tw.- ./.•tV.'fv- ■ -*■ A'- /t..'i. • ♦. V r k't l'' , > . •A • vi> # ^ ■•% V .p • • i Hr *.*.* , ** - .* ^ V . f y “'t*. - • >0 • •h> ’ I ' 'L . L • . ^ a'4-• .'•‘Vr V V ■ • V* •V, ?/ :/;>r; ♦ \ ,A' - • - ' , V H I / »r» • • M >l < J* • '.i;'. A. J. Direct^ of Public Works and County'Engineer AJL:CDS:rro % a\A. . .■» 4* y V«' 'V.- • V < ' ' V • t , 4»• • » • *I • '.H V ‘ .'t . • / ‘i ¥- .» 'T' ', 4 • ^ A# • Jf ■V : y? • t m / •<v t • V V A4 , . - .» r V * •f- •« V * * ^ / -f. . > . Hi • • 1 V < . f? t,' W n TO:W. R. Benson FROM: DATT: SUBJHCT: H. F. Muhich February 27, 1976 « ■D Lewis Scott Prooerty - 2060 Shoreline Drive Final Plat - Hartwood Sul>division The Final Plat - hardshell and milar have been submitted for this property. No changes have been made different than the Preliminary Plat. If approval is gi\on to this request, the Park Ijodication Fee should be paid. A I \ ./ i ■ i i •v' ;? , i I •* ♦ fr 5j f. I $ 'T 11 ‘ I ‘ 1 ‘, i * '. « V —• ri/: %V- * . A iti^>r4 < •> " *> # t '• V A-V ? ’A*. \ wV' " .* i'- •V ., ♦ p;:>^ f"’'«* ', . .■ /-N n TO: FROM: DATIE: SUBJECT: W. R. Benson H, F. Muhich #85 January 15, 1976 Quentin Johnson, Allen Doubldee and Ken Lantto 3509 Ivy Place - Subdivision - Preliminary Mr. Johnson owns Lots 72, 75, 76 and part of Lot 77. Mr. Doid>ledee re> cently purchased lots 73 and 74 and applied for Building Permits on the two substandard lots. I explained the situation to the applicant so he has made an agreement with Mr. Johnson to purchase part of Lot 75 and include this in a newly proposed palt along with the alley which they are also requesting be vacated. Parcel 1 would be 94 feet wide and consist of .40 acres and Parcel 2 would exceed 100 ft. width and consist of .49 acres. This area is zoned LR-IC (i/2 acre - 100 ft. lot width) Approval of this sid)idivsion would include the following variances: Parcel 1 - .1 acre area and 6 ft. lot width Parcel 2 - .01 acre area only Approval of the vacation of the alley would also be necessa^. The Planning Gonaission should schedule a Public Hearing regarding this subdivision and vacation proposal. PLANNING OtWISSION MEETING - January 19, 1976 The Comnissi(m scheduled a Public Hearing for 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, February 17, 1976. The Planning Coranission agreed the proposed alley vacation would be no benefit to the general piiilic but would definitely increase the values of the subject properties. They requested the Zoning Acbninistrator to consult with the Assessor to determine the benefit tiiat would result from this vacation. PLANNING OOWISSION MEETING - February 17, 1976 Because of the extent of objection at the Public Hearing, the Planning Connission continued the Pii)lic Hearing until the meeting of March 1, 1976 for time for additional review of the proposal. A I n TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: •5^^ Q OTT \JW. R. Benson H. F. Muhich January 15, 1976 Dale McCurdy - 4041 North Shore Drive Subdivision 4 Mr. McCurdy owns Lots 7 and 8. He is proposing to build an addition oi his existing home whidi would extend to tlie present west lot line of Lot 8. His neighbor who owns both Lots 9 and 10 has agreed to sell him 11 feet of Lot 9 to provide adequate area for the necessary side yard setback. Mr. McCurdy has requested this change by simply deducting this 11 foot strip from Lot 9. Ix>t 9, however, is already substandard. Mr. Barbush owns both Lots 9 ^d 10 so I would recommend the subdivision be considered on the basis of combining Lots 7, 8 and tlie strips of Lot 9 as me parcel and combining the remaining portion of Lot 9 with Lot 10 as another individual parcel to eliminate all of these existing substandard situations. This area is zoned LR-IB (1 Acre). Each parcel, if combined, would consist of less than 1/2 acre but each parcel is already occupied by a home. We should schedule a date for a I\iblic Hearing on this subdivision proposal. PLANNING COMMISSION ^CETING - Januaiy 19, 1976 The Conmission scheduled a Public Hearing to be held at 7:45 P.M. on Tuesday, February 17, 1976. PLANNING CO^ffISSION ^03ETING - Icbruarv' 17, 1976 The Planning Conmission recemmended .approval of the preliminary lot rearrange­ ment and combination as proposed. mi INCH. ^I^:T1NG - rebmarv 23, 1976 The Council approved the lot rearrangement nn<l combination as submitted in the Dale McCmdv application. ZaNTNG ..\MNIS1W0R - Februaiy 2(>. 1976 Mr. McCurdv has submitted bis Final Plat - bardsliell and milar. No di.anges have been made different than the hrelimiiian' Plat. If approval is given to this request, the Park Dedication Pee should Pc naiil. ;-4* c ■■ L ■ ' i‘*» ?’■ i -.'-^ ■ !'• .. ^ *. W'Jt-.m-- i I **\ ii s'?' i ^ V .. 'tr • •: -i t •'., Wr^ A ■ K V *i >: ' :‘i. VVrP'- i ••'••>■ ‘ < ' j %Vl Vk- '. i.:. • . i-v V Ii i \ i r>^ . • ►.'f ■ i.-.' :’• » >.«. .-i-* jl V. ,♦ 7v'.vI; * 'i- •' }b.v' ■■ TO: FROM: DATT: SUBJECT: W. R. Benson i II. F. Muhich Januaryr 29, 1976 ji Bay Marina Cafe - 3445 Beside Road Conditional Use Peimit Renewal Mr. Burak is requesting renewal of the Conditional Use Pennit to serve soup and sandwidies at the Stubbs Bay Marian restaurant. A similar Con* ditional Use was granted for 1975 with conditions as stipulated in Resolution No. 575, a copy of which is enclosed in this packet. Mr. Burak is considering selling his lease at present but would like the Conditional Use Pennit to remain with the business. Several potential buyers have approached me as to the status of the operation and I have shown them the Resolution and explained to them briefly the conditions and restrictions set forth in the Resolution. I will also review this matter with the Police Department and win include any reports that might be forthcoming. WORK SI-SSION - PLANNING OO^flISSION - February 2, 1976 The Commission instructed staff to check any violation of the latest Resolution and directed the staff to infoirn any interested *arties of the status of opera* tion and conditions of the Conditional Use Peimiv. This is scheduled for Plan­ ning Commission action and recommendation on February 17, 1976. ZONING ArMINISTPATOR - February il, 1976 Since hac> in December, 1975, we’ve had several parties interested in purchasing Mr. Buraklease of tlie ?ouf> and sandwich orDcration. Only 'hr. Bryant, however, applied for a license. When he came to my office, I naturally showed him the Resoluticn Agreement adopted by Council. This apparently resulted in some djsagreeincnt as he lat.r sent me a letter requesting withdrawal of the license application and refund of the application fee. I am enclosing copies of the following letters and data I've received regarding this cncration.* I >v 1. 2. 5. 4. Letter from Mr. Bryant with attached letter from his attorney, Mr. Ince, to Mr. Burak - December 4, 1975. Letter from Mr. Bryant * Januaiy 6, 1976 Letter from Mr. McClearv - December 15, 1975 ^ ^ Copies of newspaper ads witli sale listings - from Mr. Bryant - Feb. 1976 1 ■' .'•f H . f 'k f ' ’r ' . , - "; r ' ‘‘^v ■y : II n n Stubl's Bav Marina Cafe - 3445 Bavside Road - Continued PLANNING cmnSSION MHETING - February 17, 1976 The Planning Conmission tabled the application until the Planning ConmissicHn ^fceting of ?4arch 1, 1976, instructing the Zoning Administrator to request presence of Mr. .Tim McCleary, Mr. Bruno Burak and Oreno Police CTuef Mel Kilbo for review of extending Conditional Use Permit. Also reconinended Council extend expiration date of current Conditional Use Permit for one month to March 25, 1976. ^ . il * ' i ..Vg>A>-,-aA ---- 4 . f’ f r\ . .wi: ii'., >■■ ■. ■ ? 4. ••••.■ t IVr>-.liJ*4 t f* 'yim: '■ ■ *■ . »'« .• . ' ; -V-' K ■•» ; . .-> •'• i'* * - '• 4 •f * M f IW ■. -ip/•'i ;'■ .•V<*f> I ' .■y.y - . ' iL -iyS' r *! . ■ V-vf, • r.-.- -. / *i’- •.-■H',,. 2 ' k £'■.' ^a-mu'-'.. t! ■ 5;:.,v .f? ' • . V. r^' .» • :•- - i ^ • !, *'U ri- •1,. i;'-. ;] H' •' :::5 ■ -»r, ^ Wv “.1 " -V ‘I i .v;- 4*0 .-•■ .A ^ y IV. J' t •. ■ • . ff- , ?•■- ■■■ V > w* :’• ; • i ^ i ,.'4 ,4f'> •- r ■S'- VI ‘-’ii■4' pv.:. '.'t* . ,'t i. ■i' v,‘0 tt ^<i •■rHi 4 li c r . ■ • .t\ » ,'j. * I. ■V. : ■ , J ’■•'.■.••ii'- ■ Vf': .•■ fl ^ r •%. ' J ^ 'n r -4’ :* i > < . I TO: FROM: DATE: . > W. R. Benscn H. P. Muhich February 12, 1976 #97 L SUBJECT:Mr. 6 Mrs. A. T. Esco - 300 Crestview Avenue Street Vacation - G^iH Street) Mr. 6 Mrs. Esco are sutoittinf; a request to vacate a portion of Hill Street as his existing well, side entry enclosure and garage are located on the right-of-way. A similar proposal was denied by the Planning Commission and Coiaxcil on February 12, 1973. We informed the applicant's Counsel of this but he requested we proceed with the proposal as su^itted. The existing garage is in need of repair and probably could be removed or moved. The entry enclosure could be removed and the well could be moved. I vrould recoranend against this vacationas it would result in landldcking the property to the East. A Public Hearing should be scheduled. t • >|4^. ' .TT, : lUALJi. • , '^J w f ‘; 1 % *\ V. 1 •! .m i1 'i A t' i' i - i < i 1 'Ika i ^ • A TO: ?I>0^!: DATI:: RT: W. R. Henson iv. ’ - 'i^ “-'llTT KjfHenr\' Mihich Fehraarv 20, 1976 Wavzata Yaclit Club, Hij» Island Tko existing Conditional !fse Permit renewals Tiic Wayzata Club received anproval of two ConditicMial Use Permits to operate a picnic and swimming area on the Stone and Kilbaine pronerties on Ric Island. No boats will be moored permanently on these properties, only temporary transient mooring. No permanent structure will be erected, 'iliese existing Conditional Use i’ermits were approved by Council July 14, 1975 on condition they be returned for review and renewal in 1976. II 1 I «- ■ Jf" • n P'4 COM^vlODOFiP b^ fT Fo'.tef w VICK COf.'MODORE 13ei.f>v SanfofcJ I>:Wayzata Yacht Club RE a \R commodore Larry Klif.k •oLCHITAflY Mike Afid>.‘r» THCAbUHt R Uub M ision February 4, 197C City of Orooo Post Office Box Crystal Ray, MN S3 32 3 bOA'=!DOf DIRECTORS Mb,I Cole Ltirry Uc.yjias (.'‘ffil'l ijftfonti Lv^at* Qffj%sn\dn Hun Kf.'rna»^' H»jrrv -»♦ b Mo'»'is b'll Dick Woellner Gentlemen: I am enclosing conditional use applications for two areas on Rig Island, leased by the Wayzata Yacht Club for picnic purposes. The first is an area leased to the Wayzata Yacht Club on an annual basis by the owner, Mr. James Stone, to be used for picnic, recreational, and swimming beach use only by members of the Wayzata Yacht Club. Ttie area will be maintained by members of the Wayzata Yacht Club. ITte resolution granting this conditional use was approved by the Orono Village Council on July 14, 1975. A copy of this resolution Is enclosed. It Is requested that this nonconforming use resolution be renewed. The second area is leased to the Wayzata Yacht Club on an annual basis by Mr. Dennis Kilbalne for similar purposes. This area has heen used in a similar manner for seven years under similar permission by the City of Orono. Neither of the areas is used for permanent boat mooring. There have been no kno\«m changes in owners of the property adjacent to either of these areas since the previous application. Please let me know the date that these, applications will be considered, and if there are any objections or concerns your staff m;iy h;ive in order that I may be prepared to answer them. Correspondence concerning these should be addressed to me at 5000 W. 39th Street, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (»r call me at 927-3131. Sincerely, I L t /-Cfc Richard C. Woellner Chairman, Big Island Committee Wayzata Yacht Club t 9 I I ---------- > •• ^ » • n r tl /' cm OF QRONO, MDWESOm C<3nditimal Use and Variance Applicatich tF «■> «};'Iv. LOCMHOM of PIOPOSAL (or property)OTE OF FBQUEST Address Stone Propgrtv. Bl^ TalariH ^**9*J- Description Rftfl r ran ^ j: trhel *« ^ flea^Pfrom oi^er^ NaniB Wayzata Yacht Club Phxie # 927-J131 (Correspondent tor Vacnt clubT'ffiR Island Chairman)-------- Address Richard C. Woellner, 5000 W. 39th Street > Minneapolis, FIN 5541?>‘—" ' ' .......................... OMIER Mane James Stone Phane # 920-6893 Address 2500 W. 54th Street, Minneapolis, MN R1 (Conditional Use Variance T«fetlands Variance Fee FOR QRICIAL USE ONL/ Council action Date Present Zoning Present Use As below Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Iteguest Approved Denied • • S^)cify Ordinance Requixenients ^ngle family residential OQplain Reediest Relative to RaguirBroants Has been and la being planned to be used for nlcn and swimming beach area for sailboats by the Wayzata Yacht Club. No boats will be moored in this area with the possible exception of a maximum of two boats belonging tr> th^ num.9 a « Ji? »and all boats using the area have permanent moorings elsewhere on Lake Minnetonka. Nc permanent structures will be erected and only a carry out chemical toilej:. tables. 8wi*Ttj-«g beach, and temporary transient dock will be Installed. of Mon-oonfoimity Picnic and Park use for Wavzata Yacht Club Hardships to Pre^^erty None. The area will be left In its present natural state with the above temporary exceptions. Enclosed letter ^OERIAL NECESSAFQf FOR CaiPIfTTE AFPUGATION (Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council fleeting) 1 • Application ocnpleted 2. Plat Nap Secticn 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Abstractor's Certificate of Property Owners VJithin 300 Ft. 5. $30.00 Fee Date February 4, 1976 Signature Richard C. Woellner for Wayzata Yacht Club, 5000 W. 39th Street, Minneapolis Mlnticsota, 55416 J f» I )ir' •;■nki n 4 / • : 4S, •/ resolution no. »S«W “5.'SS'2Ki “•• P*"^«*^*iocate*S‘*pi|n?~ «Ppllad for a conditional P[°g«"y I»l»nd/d9acr^-d“^"?r'‘ «nd baach are. onwith the oi;y, aecr...d u, ic, application fllad constru^^ik*^^* ha. applied for a pan.lt to NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED: fU ti The u.?e of j9)v >ac ^ « the Wayza,^ Ya..:., Club and^^S^i: to nenbara of daily t>y perMn**or"p.rM-a*who‘^S^ 'j« ranoved fron tha alee traah may be allowed to accul;2u,r “|J;"thr;i5".«o i Mm. ! r.” ■=' <™«».i=.^ • TilfeT ^ n\A%# ^ ^ ^ o!J? ‘^ype'of^laL"tt tha"Jlta"^l?h^tS"^"* “*■ <*ocklng of owner who may dock hi. boat aubYeor J*** ®*®*Ptlon of theregulation..■ ^ aubject to other applicable ^hell confom^to “tL°LakrMj^Setonkr^^ *fteGuidelines and the applicable oy-h?^* Conservation District oock 1. limited to log f::t'L"en"tS?*“ clty/th^' i » t j_ _ _I_«_L adjacent to'^hr.Ue.*’* "" T^u acknowledge® the fact that It ha® clt^may refSa^to^erpn?® pemit® In the future and that th® city may retuse to grant eimtlar permit® for next year, the app?lca;jt%^'a^y“2 ordinance® and the provlalon® of thl® ^cv tSi*.;?s “y“sic:«b« i!"i975*iii2Ji “?s:r::pu?an^* ^Je^'oScSSbSr'l/t^S**^"" <*»“' •nd'^acruceura. on January 1^*1976?^*^* r«»olutl«m ahall axplt* of 4 ayes°SndVna5e;.‘^^'^ a^) I Attest: /®/ Waiter R~ften®on, Clerk-Admlnlstrator (M_ _r-Rc3*^rTL7 ^5carle®, Mayor iiMy..' The applicant hereby agceet to the term® and conditions as set forth above. WAYZATAnYACHT CLUB L' By It® LOO*ri . .**• n cm OP OIONO, MItWESaEA Conditional Use and Variance Appli< IXXavnON of PBOPOSAL (or property) ^^ddrass Kllbalne Property. Big Island Legal Deecripticn See enclosed_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ yPLTCAPrr property acquired (leased bv owner) Name Wayzata Yacht Club Ptene # 927-3131 (Correspondent for Yacht Club, Big island Chairman) A3dg888 Richard C« Woe 1 Iner, 5000 W. 39th Street,_ _ _ __ Minneapolis, MN 55416 ~ ora^ER Mane Demis Kllbalne Phone # MLcess 1878 Pascal, St. Paul, MN 55113 O' O* TXPE OF FBQUEST Present Zoning Present Use see below X Conditicnal Use Variance Wetlands Variance Fee FOR OFFICUSL USE aiLY Council action Date Approved Denied Zoning Ocdinanoe Section Relating to Request Residential Ordlnetre— Sepclfy Ocdinanoe Requireroents Single Family Residential_ _ _ _ _ \\ I i : ' » E)q>lain Request Relative to Requirsoents and is being planned to be used for picnic and swlnmlng beach area for boats by the Wayzata Yacht Club. No boats win be moored permanently In this area, and all boats using the area have peraanent moorings elsewhere on Lake Minnetonka. No permanent 'structure will be erected in the area, and a carryout toilet, tables, swlnmlng beach and temporary transient mooring docks will be Installed. Qctent of l>kT>~<70infonillty Picnic and Park use for Wayzata Yacht Club members. The area has been used for this purpose for seven years, Hardships to Property None. The area will be left in Its present natural state. ■'[’ 1- m Enclosed letter MEDBRXAL MECESSAIV FOR CGMPLETE AFPLICATION (Must be submitted 1 v«eek prior to Council Meeting) Application oonpleted Plat Map Section Survey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Abstractor *8 Oectifioate of Property OMnars V7ithin 300 Ft. ' >•-} 5. $30.00 Fee Date Fehrufirv 4. 1976 Signature Richard C. Woellner for Wayzata Yacht Club 5000 W. 39th Street Minneapolis, *iN 55A16 j 4 i . V,'. R. Henson il. 1. '{uhich IV'hniarv 26, 107<) #96 Kennetli W. Oicn - Cnsco Point Road S»’\)i \’ision - I'rel iininarv' This total parcel consists of ^1,000 sq. ft. and is locateil iii an residential zone with lot roquirenents of 1/2 acre (21,7fin sq. ft.J and 100 ft. lot width. Mr. Oien is requesting, sultvlividinj' this iironerty into two lots, hnth ex ­ ceeding. the 1/2 acre area and iOn ft. lot width at tlic location of the Iiouse . If this is approved another '^ower charge will have to he assessed on the extra huildinp site. A PiiMic ilearlnp should he scheduled. \ i A .4- : V CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application #.0 iC?Wir*'' < Street Location of Property: Date rl //.? /? L Legal Desmption of Property: ^ Kf ^ [Namej ' // /C'^ t U J RLS ^6/ f\l ^ ‘■/M> Owner CAwess)'^/^jLl2£115.(TTioneJ lype of Request:Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Peimit Subdivision Approval Other Descx^tion of Request: idic.cc.<i.'o G. %! 'hvCi 3^ ■<jf^ (Applicant;(Owner) Please draw or attach a sketch of proposed structure showing the following: ■T 1. Indicate North 2. Location on Lot 3. Adjacent Street Names 8. 4. Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. 5. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. Exhibit Submitted: 6. Dimensions of proposed structure 7. Proposed setbacks Zoning in force in this area p or plat showing the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. Abstractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of tlie owners of tha land within 300 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting the change or rezoning as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing 50% of property oivners within 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance. Village recomnendations: - 2 / Tj >r^ •ideist' >.'■ ■■■: ‘V ■t I ^;V V, lit I flO* :\u nj(i (•'•u rvey a tV \ / V * \ i; U«if:lPV njrt .Suivty M*»r!Ks jjM C< 1; . '--i'-iiOi-rt/i /r*!k. ^ < i V.\ X •• ••••.9^/7 \ / i /l ..c lifjoonn.ft. J- 7 A. “ >• -^ ■ . ■ P~.‘ 't,'-'- * >■ •Ties of •zoning Ik •: fc i.i»i . ' Ifk- , '<7r' ^ k:-M / / * / ■ i- • f' /— sr,ooo iv ^ # //f %» \ '^4, i! Vi / . * *. Cfritrioat^* f’ 'k.-^fev; X h«r«by cortJt'y thtt this ^ • tzni* and <'.crroct repreaanta- Mon of o survey of the boim^srlofl of Tirocts 0 and n, »ef?iRt-«^red Lard Survey ;lb« 461» Wlos of Heeiptrur Titter, Count;/ of 'iennr^ri. '1 ' ■ F e..4^' - t • ^ F>™ •■ ••. r ■ • : ,''■ . ■ >;. U; ■ ! .^ i. .• ' * ■ V • ^w ."i Mir:.” •A. t iite t n • « ibid < !• * 50* ^12-71 Iren narVor Bulldiii^s u catlcna arid additional land urua addod on 2-9*76 Gordon H, ToffliJ Rog Land Surveyor and Plannor Long l4ake» Minnc ’^ota .k' . • j • • . • - •’< ’■■tr-';- ■- ar rr 4 .•'r A'Y V ;y:^ *'• ■ /■* Jy , ;.=.] PIaamt ot« '.•’ •■ ' • ‘.B ■'.rv'<r' M 5'i? ^ *j/» '".A^. LA*i*v-' v'te ’V tY-': /;,* y^. ‘y^^ ry. '‘i.'i am6 niANNik^^ "'' ‘ ' »A.«*-WA»Wl»ili(ll ilOAOi.4’-v"'. y:^' r 'Y. ■*■ V LONIt WAHC, MltNN. •$ 9li*-* -'• .‘f. ?/■'"'' ■■/• • *■ l.’A-W i\iIM m. «♦ %.■•?“ i. • « > •' - C’. ?'j'. ■ ‘ •* •' ■^-*j *•■ " 'tv • ^ V-' ' ■ 'vv> f#-.Ke^An»U’ v,."'t)i^n:'*''^,-;,' -•,' ■■■•!' dividing Tjr^cta C ATvr R, Ijtj|d Soi^y'N** 46I ••• .- '*' «v' . ' , -'■-*"•* ' . V-". ’. ; • '• ■ -.w ♦• c- ■'i < .V • = ' - '•? Iteftterly parol • Plir 1: Thflt pnri of th»* folb'Vln'^ deacrlK^d nv^vner*/; ' Jhn < , . •; f . t i,-. ' .. ,v v: V .; .. -g. .;• , •. . J ' VV ><''' ' :'■'» ' ■•*' '•,'■ ^‘•r.'v.' ■ ' ’.. ;■. V-- •■ "v ■ ■ • ’ ■ ■'■ \V ^' V'?ynnii 1^?- !n 3pr1cf 4*arV, l,Ak» Mlnnoljrr'k*, a/‘-''crdvni ’;'to the? ^ pl'*^ ’^r fll« f,r nf ve^rir'^ in the affirm .0^ thr of ?>•;•/*!* In »<nd •aid d:.nr>^v, lyjnf^ of h Ilr« dr.nwn fr^'T, a point fr. the v r.’tti',-i^^. } y line of nnfd !.<^t• to::*j dlptrmi //; fant ■V'uthvpptorly fro® th« wnnt 'ktctArlf' n-rlr.t nf «#ld ^ tx'lnt In tho Nort.hvaa^jcrlr lln^ '••f »ald i<t 107, c?iftMv.r f«ot i*S^x-y Soi5th%iKp. t«r1 V f »r.»r -th* TTOst Poy^h^r^ y nrnnT of anirt lit-t ‘ ‘” A V«r.+ h»lr o** Control Avenq»», vac**.ta<?, 1/ir;' Iwiitpnr njrten^lrrr- tt of th® > .'^1 ^ l^n# of aaid Lot I'"'’’ .iri 0 15n*' e\f>n'Tir.t! fr^r •« nr'Jnt ■'■n.th^ st^riyv linn cf - J ..r J I c- ’<'* 1* fOAt r*r ‘?i*>'<»rly filr.»T*4v f! S«t'+-^riy 15n** of i-vfd Lot.. fvrT' *v.y '•f'V.r/<r of eaid T.»r•^ l*>f .to tho trort Ko:*th«rly nc^r.^r of *■ *4 '**'f‘|.1 ^ ‘'’V 1V&C■ V--I \w r. f tV),» frllowf.?’^ .i«r'~? M>*d l.tf.e;o?c5icj>ciiig.«4'tJiO r^'int of !rter»ec*^i ■ 4^P pfy^t.e ?’crtl?r7.y lim of Trert f, s,a.if Ii»nf ?•<■;. If I, wlxl"^ thp :T-9h0f9 of Lntr. ''•’'r'r^tr'rVr.: theisijo VorV*^!.y. nlong Jr» tiort ’^orlY Hr/- tr.rtVrweot^i'J^ •' yycorn^r o.f f«v'? c, •;ntd cornf'-" ijr.fr.- of o'* tlie Vine Ve'r.g diMli>. ...yprtbed; th'ffKv* de TLeetlr,*^ left 19 17 T^vr^^til* tovtiia 'VikJtvt< flj -ti ■''':'4bperlhet^ end ♦V'np'eridii^g, • ■ v- -'•1. . ■.,«• m 't 'j*'1'•»- i *i ':m •^:vi ■t-; •% ^'*'^• frrot.'i C er«d R, -cf R»^i«tmr cf 7'iloflV Ol^tgr cf •crne»'1r, o3fcopt that pari of «»idyfcX74ct<. Ijflng So^tkurly of a line ^rd lt» * ./ VI ; -V-: dntvr. WortVaotf/rl^ fTva or* tl^' Leatc;r'ly.;iSl^^^ i; dlstafst^ r.nieafii;r*::d .ulon,’ $.'»M Winterly Hne ^6iid.Luettetl^yffcj!p. ;.■■'■?,preald Trhcl R, point'■depcrlho© tta'vfoljcwc fyy. ■ " \% ■"’’ :^f'y Cotmrrltifi at the rxst Soiith»M ‘Ir ^orr.er'^ fvojcVtlfeef riprU^ekiiterXy^ ^ s i’^rV' the '^iitheistorly Hnr, pf feid Trurt C » di^itaPoe tfter.op K^*riKerV on • line vhlrK if extended: vei^d irUmnt;-the, }iOfU.«rl^' j|y^ TlSsot J? at.% poii^^ K^:'i.;:iiiMt^T\t -IW frrit Ractt^riy- ?5h'r theH^cPthvcotorXv corao^hf »ai& 4 diA^ndB‘ i iV'et tc th4 Ph’Jnt bolnF-'d^'i^orllved* . '••‘••''■.V ■'• '. -VV ■ 11'-« half l^rlngrbW y^'%aHit; pn^ the fowi '■ ' a mterly lire of ealrf I;ot ir’? fror: t>» nieat Eaiterl^ to the .mi' ' ?^t;vlfeHherly Cf.-vr«r of Tfict IWFlctej^; Ltaiid Survey Ko, : Mlv' «»4 « %?^Clctered lend Survey l«o. 4^l> with the Lek«;.littii|e:^i«^X We.eterly Jorjerr.rtng at tio point of thtersecUen cf tJiii ei* 4TWaet < ■JM ■>• Vetid Uprthnriy line tc the TJeriho^sterTy rdriwtiF of eeld v«rnMr telrg L-^^|PB|«t of beglnr.i r»g of tJip Hiie hoiPR 4er.<ifihed|; Ilw»nc«vd4f1&ilng 1^ 19 degrees 17 f to the Weet(»rljr rfi^^f^Wfty llPe of; fteid>ae#M toro ', ■j| .■ ^ Til, ,. at j>T"«i •• "'V ^ <• vWV •.• 'A 'f-'■V j-UU: rfrvun lloi^ttietsterly ^vHpi. pert of TracU^t? *^ R>/.i9|dioterodv,Tiiiid-'^^^ of" on the WOBtorly line, of ;«^iliP! SoiithweaUrly the wpet Northerly noimer of M<t thKeigh e point de»«* JijDPii^ Henreplr^ lying Southerly >^»vlll^e /|nd lte^,i^^ _________________^ ' inltt on the WOBterly lino Of direct |^;ili#ten alonK eeid W9*t9rif | ■•' Y «. < , 'm folWj . . .Am ^ ■ fiBdiwnetng at -the flioet Sotrtherly obrr.9i^;o;f Rortheepterly .tlo«g pV;J,’tlin.8otttheaiterly\Uno-of TPnet Kert}<erl.r on n If entmided wil4 lnteroec%*^4lMi fljW-thei^^ paid tmet ft et •* peffit .«Utint 120 Pi9t inptdrly the PoHlMei,^r^ 001^ 9, « dUtence * v n bBlBg e»crH»4, , , ;> = :■ -u ■* ? :.# ■:‘r •4/.•:,--r ■%•*••/ J tit ■' - ' '■' >o Vvr /' ^ ■« ^ ■ ' ■ 1. V - •. -1 ., V V*/;--:. \ •,• ■', t •i^*-*^* -r ‘“'>-v*-j •»** ^^:fe-';'. >' i <M> • ? . • ' * < * •/ '»■ # I- ’. -^ ' * ' V- »•* ■ '■, ■-. ■ " -..'I , — ■» » • ♦<f| .» .F*r»,•* ■ —••^'■ C' I . ■* . " . W-* «•» A*. • .-. 4 ' * /V* ^ ,'C.F ■ ’c v- 't'* •»♦>-,.,^r ; : ,*#*■ ». ^ 'n ■ ^ Dams / V \ K _ '•*- •- '• ■• •-•»■■ ■ "*-to •-fc.- :- r-. - **♦*■“• *v . . • « -♦ ■•V , ^ • A i . • • .... .■Djx^Oas,.^,.^..' ... v-OvL' ^S^sirVNBrHs i— \cc.rs...— ..«. ,. <, • » I ■ V ...?rr , * "S. .A ) . -A ^ .V .-• V-r ;' ’d ;:; • ’. / i «. .1 - «»^' - - '" y - «-.»*#• .'.■v^-‘‘',.<“ 7', i.' 5^. . '' !• r. - k’i^, -.^:--- ■ •-. s' ;j.i'JbC.'.. ^.J. ............. (i? ^ # . * y^ ^ »■------- » • r** -»- .u .-fs' t^rst .'.1—a;; ■ ♦•— ^ ;7T •*> *.34. >; V*- 9 ir'► *f »^. »M«>f *-• • V -au. 77 Cl 'J-.1^ I •... (j^ y d2^cc*t ^ ^l2ou<. /^2-T'/-^^3 ^c? atC^kc/t-ce^ ^(y\yuut^ . ()V74^:-xvrc:^A’ n»fe«B. n,„„„ >/atj, Mii>>), 5539] '.•j^'V.^ ) /? A t:^ t V 02987 c!!‘ ^^•^'■‘-^•’11 SS39| •A ' • ’ f ' : •• vj^^- f' i --------- •n V; V-. .V-- ^^1- .'■ V- 'V'^-; irV^'■ V’'i'.' ' !’■’ ‘:M •-»■>■' •*■-. • \- v/' i 'rs ir* I* 0 l.‘ V*:* . ...............................• . : t'.?« ■ ; ;•• .• ;.' r sr. aco-DU.Vca ; ..}. "i >> t y i 1 ff/'Af i- DEPAKflCNt OF Flliil ROOM 116. COURTHMT mWlEAPOUS. MINN. 6$41$ IRBSliil-^'■%mS' il ;'••• PimRTY ONNERS LIST NMC f #9« DEsaiimoN K caoaK::^ V'■•:■■■■ : ^v-:vp,., . . -1 t;. . •: ’ /„ . r- v=-.'i '. ' •■:■ /'• •';; :!. '■^■o)a.-4^i»LEZZiZIIX^ 4J8JJLC V .......... LPlar r^Q:M30MJ C.iApi.odlduSi?itl.<!^it iUl . jhUsJU;) Q Cil L’^!'-''..^ r ^ UH.UO IfOCS?- kk U I^^Lah A _ ^ i£ij.e^.BlL Mil ^ V .;^:• rOigoo O tP-t fV... KM ~ ^ -■-. -v . .. '=v,*f ’vWw"Hs#;S' ^ . X-lsJL0i.i(3f)9J3) r^atX-h Plcir /slO.*4k)Sg) ^ ^r: \CluAI.C mm R\)ey hJo.mn IMoiX 30i^' Cn‘y^^' 9t Hftjtr / TiomJ iftiE5^-0^a3P0) . LL.?3kJdki^M • I t ♦ twa wc wr yrrn/eifi v IT; i : i _ :^i.»k • Y..*, ' ':■ s *m» W>'W^. i '■'*■ jA Av..-:3S!(A.i o / i.P.4»ft.LLisi>./Ag. /4/rV *i<*Ll£K.i H cy. T- FLg.f ^^7. 7 ir/ c••ij, ..u.'....' «L V ■ ».wr,.■».••* *<y* *•■'•.■*'•» . ?-4 '., • ■ . v-'v-- ;.^,'fe';, ■ - •■-? .,- . '^.>-V;^.. kv' ■: ■ , / • - ■■ ' jl.!». rC, ... - :-fcef_t 4 •'>/ ’ *^1 ( / ' ‘ i . < /' t -;u J y 'X. - ■:?. .-r'^ -. i .iM-S' Y. V ►! ,.,-.y.‘ 31'^. '■« y Q '1 0: PnOM: a\7r.: sinupcr: K. R. Henson 11. P. Hihich ^cbru-iF)' 27, JXfr /t/‘ •If’ Havid .T. KnisVbpf • I20H Kildhurst Trail Varimcp - Lot Area and ’s'idtb Tills property is located in an LR-IR residential zone. Mr. IvrasLopf is requesting a variance fran lot area and width requirements of one acre (4.7,560 sq. ft.) and 140 ft. lot width. His lot consi.sts of .7 of an acre and is 90 ft. wide therefore, he i.s requesting variance.^ of 17,068 sq. ft and 50 ft. The proposed location does meet all setback requirements. Ilcxvcvcr, we do have a problem in the existing location of the residence on the property to the south. Ke have here a non-conforming situation which wc should rectify. At the time that the neighboring residence was constructed surv'oys were not required with beilding ix?rmit applications. This house is nw encroaching the nr-'r^-r. no to such a degree that it does not even meet the minimum State ri < . j^os-Tits. We might suggest as an agreement between the property owners, to change the lot lines somewhat so wc can resolve some of tlie problems. We could also consider sliglit variances on the side setback to tlie nortli. We should tr>' to meet the 20 ft. distances between structures ;md also prevent futinx* problems from any fences that might lie erected imdcr another property owners windows. cm OF ORONO, MDWESOm rr»vHHflruil Use and Variance Applica^• loamotl OF PICPOSAL (or property) Address O-r^^ 7' /^W/^ TSfPE OF FBQUEST Legal Description r ^ /2,l>S t//^ APPUCANT Date property was acquired i tS^ I None bA'^-9 J. tcr'e.o^lC-r,Phaie « ^■-Vo-^I^S luASUfecC>V> UK. i OWER Mane Phone # Address Present Zonim i,g- iB Present Use V^caajj Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Conditional Use Variance Wetlands Variance Poe / .r > ///f FDR OFFICIAL USE ONUf Council action Date __ Approved Denied S^pcify Ordinance RBOuireroents y/t/A/- d^ffr y4£C4 / AC__________ /A m. ^er /^c/=r /o' Explain Rsguest Relative to Raquirenents J.C 7~ Extent of l^-oonformity jfT (P* 7 Hardships to Property Jt/T A/=' MEHERIAL NECESSAFQf FOR COMPIETE AFPLICATICW (Must be suhndtted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1. Application ocnpleted 2. Plat Map Section 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Abstractor's Certificate of Property Owners Vlithin 300"Ft. 5. $30.00 Fee I Date 2 76 \ Signature /j noe if -i r , ::. n.onosM NO. 271.5 NO nea so dak 75S WI8 NO e-eiTs R jOWA no B971 NO OAK eao MONT NO ieiB-6 TEXAS NO aseao . _______ M^b^ol^tNC ENGINEERS G SURVEYORS SO NINTH AVCNUC SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNC90TA SS343 PHONE S3S-7S01 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BuiLoens NUM4 NO A37A 60 OAK 761 W!8 NO &S74 lOvyfk NO 3/OS NO OAK tlO0 MONT NO 17A9-S vC Ibp of found. 983.6 /./ / /•* fA-l Ar ‘v « «* >5 »<»3k/ r*5o' 7^ of 979.0 Top of /non opposite //if corner of garage os shown. E/ev.~985.S (//G^O- 7929) • - Denofas iron monument sef o-penofes iron monument- found x(9m.i)'Oenoies exist, spot e/ev. Prop, garage f/ocr » 955-5 7 •. \\ ori../ ■i 14.0 & K A% •/A It I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: Troc/ 3, Pegisfered Lane/ Purvey Ab. H/6j Hennepin County, Minnesota. ^ AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. ANO ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAO LAND. // AS SURVEYED BY ME. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. THIS ^ ------------ DAY OF January ---------------^a 76 // o/so shows the location of the stores os ^t for o proposed building.REGISTERED L aNO SURVEYOR ' 1 «ON nVEYQR 4** - > 1200 WILDHURST TRAIL MOUND, MINNESOTA February 14, 1976 ¥98 We the undersigned agree to a variance for Mr, & Mrs, David Kruskopf to build a home on Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1116, Hennepin County, Minnesota, understanding that the lot is approximately .7 acres with lake frontage of 90 ft., whereas the Orono Ordinance requires 100 ft. of shoreline and 1.0 acres of property. 'f r'* :ti * ■ , 'xJ.' '' ‘jf ' C.' Edwin ,R, Michael landin 1186 Wildhurst Tr., Tract A RLS 1116 Plat 43145 Parcel 4000 f/ >^i Tald Gary W. Welsh 2304 IDS Center Tract A Plat 43147 RLS 1132 Parcel 5000 Rt. 1 Box 275 Plat 43500 Parcel 3350 4t 'm j) \i7. James M. Phelan 4650 Tonkaview Lane Plat 43500 Parcel 5310 1221 Wildhurst Trail Plat 43500 Parcel 5400 H • V'- I . • -L -■ •» . ’i?4 ^ Wildhurst Trail Plat 43500 Lot 26 Parcel 2900 '^^e E. Rahn 1 Dorothy Loew Roger Kraines f^55 Forest Lake Landing Tract C RLS 1019 Plat 43129 Parcel 4500 5420 Three Pts. Blvd, V, i.mr .1. ... > *-.A A. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ROOM 116, COURTHOUSI MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55415 JO i PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ADDRESS y 98 DESCRIPTION 'h,},KliU5KOff \Phr aIQ._ li.K-id!lclk(^br7'k B %thaA id- f rfz- ^'^'Pd/d /??/>/ Ajjfy iO. U)<- A ^ / s r<f x^i^/7 Lh aM. (/Mr 3 h'di) tvfe;c> /t 'ihe.o^A'^ Lci^u) JU(> i t %-ir^atT /) ' .V LOT \ JYb4T i/0s>0 9^/v^.; i* I /)/ / /T . cO li 'jLtti^rp £hei^A/£t ' r/‘dYdJdIiUA'::-r . Pe&d^jrejiretil/Y.iO 5u/^.sLi.'fMo.JJl>9 '^/fl-r' /Jo. _______ C'c- A\ A'/V/r/Z/c-: A"' ' d. Icr.. T - \ _____ BLK. PARCEL — ; I y/j' ^QOO ---------i ■M ffdOO. J3^0 53J0_ ^voo. JY9D.O iiffOO 1 ■ M C V ' J L > > Sf ; ' > ■■ ^*1.V.. *<m4 > VOCL ?<QQ K. R. Henson 1!. V. 'Iu)uch r'4 v; ARCEL /r Febman’ 26, 1976 rhomris Hi ere - oSO North Arm Lane Subdivision - Preliminan' DOO OOO tr.*. This proix?rty is located in an LR-IA residential zone with minimum lot re­ quirements of two acres- and 200 ft. lot width. Tliis total parcel consists of 9.6 acres and is ."iSZ feet wide at the road. Mr. (lierc is requesting approval to sul)divide this parcel into two lots of approximately 176 feet wide. H-oth parcels, however, would meet the minumim area. Parcel k consists of S.4 acres with .4 acre of wetlands and the area of Parcel H is 4.1 acre. A Public Hearing should be scheduled. •- ■ 1'^ r i / n :ase CllY OF OROMO, MINNF^A Land Use Application Fee c' V Date Street Location of Property: . ■? jy frf A/ Legal Description of Property: Owner: ^ (Namej (Address)(Phone) Type of Request:Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Aj:)proval Other Description of tequest: /^/c / S. ^(y/J /y^/ '/x' I ■J < * ’ c Applicant)(Owner) Please draw or attach a sketcli of proposed structure shol^/ing tlie following: Dimensions of proposed structure Proposed setbacks Zonuig in force in this area Indicate North i Location on Lot Adjacent Street Names Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. Distances between any prqx)sed structures and structures on adjacent property. Exliibit Submitted: Map or plat shoiving the property affected and all lands w'ithin 300 ft. of t!ie boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. Abstractors or attorneys certification listing the najues and address of the owners of • the land within 300 ft. of tlie boundaries of the proj-jerty requesting the change or rezoning as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing 501 of property owners within 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance. Village reconmendations. Ec /VA./ c / f <^jj±lk £/? Q/1 ('/: L, J. / /. - c /j i B . ' iPROPFJv'TY OWNERS LIST DESCRIPTION ‘TDORESS / ^/A, i. tt', L , / .. / ' / ., '' / ' i. ' > •/ / . *^V ‘ < / (.j v-y LIA, / /*\' V .' r / /7! / 4'^'a / V— < ' !t •./)i/ tY'iifiii, /a-/ .V//;*/Vvr. 5'. ,»y./; ///.'. .'' / /i/ ij u / V ' /' / . 7 A.,? 7 /r.; / k /'' / vk- V i C .•>: -.y// c'' /V ^ // / T>i / f f f '/ Ai^’ii (k\'nil f •/ i/ .vYi. w/if/ ii .h {•' y k / L>;' I . • • : {i r- •• 4. ■ ” f . . • 4* . ‘ •I V- ‘ ■ *‘* !.•%••• . 4 • LOT • 4i%’. » V BLK.i PARCEL - -^jL:.z:=sXr=rz-..^rc=.=^^ / . ., c-.. • ■ ' " . k ......... , ,/ // . ' — ^ I- ••.— >: ^ //■ ( - ,«v-- r t -M. ■ J SAMUEL a MARFELD 3025 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MMNESOTA 55441 553-1717 February 20, 1976 tir. Hank Muhich Building and Zoning Director Citv of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Hank: I am writing in response to your February 16 letter. In order to make the plan more understandable, as you have requested, 1 am having cross section B—B drawn to scale, and I will be sending that to you in just a few days. Other than redrawing cross section B-B, the plans submitted are more than adequate. They furnish all the information you requested in your previous letter and contain a great deal more information than was requested at the time we met in Court. The engineering, in order to furnish you these plans, has cost me $321.35 to date. It should not bo necessary for me to spend any additional money to have the plans drawn to a larger scale. I would suggest that, if you need them drawn to a larger scale, you have tliat done, and submit a copy to me for approval. I will be happy to cooperate with yot in this regard, but T cannot spend anymore money on the plans In your request for the plans, you did not state what scale you wanted. For you now to ask to have the plans redrawn to a scale that was never requested by you previously is nothing more than pure harassment* • « At the time ve met in the courthouse, it was never agreed that I would locate the trees in the open area. Even the judge questioned that request. Since the bank has been cut down, there is no need for trees to be located in that area. The possibility of erosion has been cut down to a greater extent than from what it was previously, even without the trees being located there. In my letter of February 10, I expressed ihe same concern I had expressed previously that the city might continue to prosecute me ’inder the various ordiMnees which control the 75 feet next to the lake. Mention ;-’as mude at the meeting in the courthouse that I could be prosecuted fc^ every day of violation. It might be possible for the city to find that excavation was done on days other than those .j i^ifl iiir IT~ V [O':' *.V i r \ . l-.lv'*{V : ,f- ■, n Mr. Himk Muhich -2-February 20, 1976 mentioned in the complaint. A separate prosecution could then be starte.d, even though that excavation was what I am being prosecuted for now. In other words, I have to know that, when I make a good faith settlement, the city in good faith will not find some technical reason for prosecuting me solely to harass. The purpose of this settlement is to settle finally and forever all the work that has been done at my place to date. I want some assurance that there will be no other prosecution for any of that work. I think it is understandable that it wouldn’t be fair to me to make a good faith settlement without having the peace o£ mind of knowing that 1 will not be prosecuted for the same thing all over again on some other technicality. You will be getting the revised cross section in a few days. If you need anything further, please let me know. Yours very truly. Samuel S. MarfieId SSMrjl P, S, Twenty-two sets of the aforementioned revised cross section are hereby enclosed and have been signed by me and my t iglneer. f • ** -. r r.i-r. .... i •I J r . s. r f • ) •• . • • r F-L'z » } ■j 00 <iiF<rf<ii»iii J): f' I '.■t e\ '1 1 1 i , ’> Li |l , r A i * n n TO; FROM: OATT:: SUBJECT: W. R. Benson n. F. Mnhich February 26, 1076 # ^#10 Daniel T. Lindsay (Kelly Avenue Holding Company) 2505 Kelly Avenue - Rezoning Mr. Lindsay is requesting rezoning of the north 20 ft, strip of land lying in the new south parcel of the old T.D.S. property which was recently divided into three lots. The north property line of the south parcel is located 20 ft, beyc»\d the south line of our currently zoned conmcrcial area. Therefore we are faced with a situation of a 20 ft. strip coiranercially zoned area located in a parcel which will be used and is zoned residential. The rezoning of this strip will also incre.ase the residentially zoned area of the parcel and therefore increase credits for building. We should try to maintain one zone in individual parcels when tliey are put to a specific land use. This 20 ft. strip is currently zoned B-3 and the applica.it is requesting rezoning to LR-IB, the same as die major portion of this new parcel. A Public Hearing should be scheduled. 11 m. 3 4 mm n cm OF ORQNO, MCWESOTA land Use Applicatlcn #J.01 Pee $/00. OO Date Street Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: i»&r ““Iora lype of Request Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Peimit Subdivision Approval Other </7l - ^V>t D^ription of Request: ISe^oiAeV » |Swtiia^\ Pgpi\ua^ (Appiicmt)' I nor tie /o4 T Please draw or attach a sketcn ot proposed structure showing the folloiang: 1. •> 3. 4. 5. Indicate North 6. Location on Lot j\ Adjacent Street Names 8. l^ocation of setback and use of adjacent existing building. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. Dimensions of proposed structure Proposed setbacks Zoning in force in this area Exhibit Submitted: ^ or plat showing the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. ^stractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of the owners of w* Md within 300 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting the change or rezoning as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing SOI of property owners witliin 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance Village reconmendatioriS: f r^. TMOMAH \ t NNi'M itONAliP 9. LlNUOUl9t NOIIMAN W NCVVMALL LAUnCSS V ACAMAN OCMALO t MAONUSON rnWAlID M GVCNNON MCLVIN I ORCNSTCIN CuaCNC H HfATiNG JAMCS P. MAATINCAU MICMAPD J.riTlOCRALO PHILIP J. OPTNUN SALISPUPV ADAMS MACLAY R HVOC COWARD J PARACR JOHN A rORRCST WILLIAM C FOX JCRROLO r BCRCrALX WILLIAM r DOLAN WILLIAM C.MORTCNSCN LCW SCHWARTC JOHN H.STRQTHMAH DAVID G. NCWHALL OlNNi"^ M M^THkHCN RURflS A ORLCNLCY RORCRT V.AtMORC DAVID C MRAUSC JOHN O. WINSTON OANICI T. LINDSAY LAURANCr. R.WA lDOC h Thomas h .garrctt m DAVID C WCIS5. JR. HARRY C. PIPER III DARYLC L. UPHOrr WAYNC A SIVERTSON DAVID J DAVENPORT MARK R JOHNSON RONALD L. ROLLINS RICHARD J. TORRC RICHARD A.PRIMUTH jCrPREY R. SCHMIDT KRISTINE J STROM TIMOTHY N BUTLCR ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR DIANA E MURPHY n LINDQUIST & VENNUM 4200 IDS CENTER • SO SOUTH OTr STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5S402 TELEPHONE (6(2) 335-6661 CABLE address : LINLAW WAY2ATA OFFICE wayzata medical UUILOINO 4>50 north central avenue wayzata , MINNESOTA SS3GI February 25, 1976 ^ -J Mr. Hank Muhich P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota Dear Hank: 55323 ft '■.1 > ■: ^<fu |U«I Enclose<a is our completed application for the rezoning of the northerly 2C feet of Plat No. 42420. Included along with the application is the Hennepin County's certificate of the property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, a plat showing the property effected, the subdivision map showing the exact location of the pioperty effected, a legal des­ cription of the subject property and our check for $100.00. If anything additional is needed in order to perfect the application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, LINDQUIST & VENNUM K 0^4?' I! Daniel T. Lindsay DTL:Ih Enclosures ‘:1 COUNTY HO/iU- nrv. ROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ANIEL T LINDSAY LOTS 13 - IS, BL. 6, LANGDON PARK \i s.^ ‘ p » ■ L'* V Ui § kl '^C » ^ '1131 s. 'J U j ^A M > ' -I % s PROPERTY OWNERS LIST U 01 NAME .address _<? f /-t A • « 1^/C (oKr}/^/\; description - it/o£M Gfa/?/?ea.C . I 1^- JikAi^l2'£- I ££./l£^/fdS- £ycOa/fj^ j2njk^ I iViS f/^Ope/Crie)& r>i:'Jj:!Ljj._:^y. ^^Op€/ef>e. nCjdoN P/< ’/so]____ ^-.adJydr/d ,>f-AV.__ t i h'^'^ ,P7lOf''-y h V'•T'V \i ^ ^ r\/DI ■ 7)S_fko pc e I^n.r h\y > •i •« yVy n r- o i A - H^sfic. /cf A'. lA t //C>^ A/ ^ ^ \ / ‘« /V I '-xyy-zcui . I 41'J.-&/A?Oec/eA’fcate./«5 \P/y?r a'd. 4y^ido\, ’ ' V. •n ' -.'V ?. •;/ a V/.-v /// 7^* / ✓ / / f* ///**: fjUrT^op P h/^ \mA3^rJz.^l i f\ > Pe ye/fsoA/ il AO/i.Cf \ K JLIa^ ^c _ % 3c- / '/-■ i. t'L/ L ■<v<: /"'y/.c-'L A- y 1^70 . A^OAil'^c Jk. '^-!Lc 7 ///.t« . ^ « -- •• ••• - A(. 'k /y A'' i' A' .. r£:'^=iyr ----------------------------------*« / *. • - / V »*• i Ut 5..(2... JnlvdSyog .1 ■• t.‘ - - : ^ . V - •y r*'./ *./ . ' / / '^r-s /7 v-/<P LOT /.<? // BLK.PARCEL ll J. J. J.. J A / L^:, / A 3s y A V </ ^PS-Cs 9c<(s~ 0970 0.9IR v^‘19 / y 2Jxy^'^JScA: /r>f- r/i^/ -• , j», ,» »• /, ^ »• I i.-. ru 4 /3SO079c>- Oqs'O 4/o6 6^SZ3