Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-13-1999 Council Packetr Public Attendance Meetlng D ate I a- 3 vf ^ C ouncil □Planning COMMISSION Park C ommission Other Please ntL out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ., PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1.<rSo ivvii.7 2.1'v^T; v n V 1 !fj (J ••'vl^9 !-f"x V { J ' 4./I J 1 o >.f /£*^ /X L >' /ry :• 5./ / / i '■ (- •^ 7.\jfV)17^, !ad 'Z):- «. .'Tiki v'Qx^Cs.xV ^ / 1 9. 10. 11. 12.^_________________________________________________________________________________ 13._______________________________________________________________________________- 14. 15. XiUPPr WPWINi^ WPOOCS* rORMy Pl^UC.ATT COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 0^C 1 3 1999 OK OHONO December 10,1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ^4 Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Presentation Regarding Saga Hill Park Award The Preservation Alliance has recognized the efforts of those involved in preserving a substantial amount of land in the Saga Hill area as parkland. Irene Silber has requested an opportunity to make a presentation to the Council regarding this recognition. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. COUWCII, MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DEC 1 3 1999 DATEffllcWnb(*!4W999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Adoption of the 2000 Annual Budget and Tax Levy - Resolutions Attachments: 1. Resolution Adopting the Final 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000 2. Resolution to Adopt the 2000 General Fund Budget 3. Resolution to Adopt the 2000 Special Revenue Funds Budgets Proposed 2000 Budget The proposed 2000 budget reflects an effort to address increased service needs, particularly in the public safety area. The budget also reflects increased expenditures to accommodate increases in costs from other agencies, and to adjust the City's compensation schedule to be competitive with the market. Tax Levy, Tax Capacity, and Impact on Properties The proposed property tax levy for 2000 is $2,363,500. This is an increase of $71,680 or 3.13% over the 1999 levy. Due to new construction and market-based property value increases, the City’s tax capacity has increased to $15,679,527 for taxes payable 2000. This is an increase of $1,062,198 or 7.27%. The increased tax capacity, together with the 3.13% tax levy increase, has resulted in a reduction in the City’s tax capacity rate from 15.380% to 14.800%. The effect of the proposed tax levy on property owners is as follows: A. A property valued at $ 100,000 for taxes payable 1999 and $ 105,000 for taxes payable 2000 would have an increase of 1.4% or $2.58 in the City’s portion of the property’ tax bill. B.A property valued at $200,000 for taxes payable 1999 and $210,000 for taxes payable 2000 would have a reduction of .6% or $2.47 in the City's portion of the property tax bill. I Request for Council Action continued Page 2 December 10,1999 Adoption of the 2000 Annual Budget and Tax Levy - Resolutions _______________________ General Fund Budget Expenditures General Fund expenditures are highlighted as part of the proposed budget information because they have the greatest impact on the tax levy. The proposed 2500 General Fund expenditures are $4,053,480. This is an increase of $203,480 or 5.28% over »he 1999 budget. The main items causing the expenditure increase are the hiring of an additional police officer, annual and market- based pay adjustments, increased fimding for fire equipment replacement, and costs related to the hiring of a new police cliief. Sewer and Water Bate Increases To provide adequate funding to address sewer and water infrastructure nppds, water rates are proposed to be increased 2.9% for 2000, and sewer rates are proposed to be increased 3.2%. COUNCIL ACTION REQUFSTED: Motion to adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution .Adopting the Final 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000 2. Resolution to Adopt the 2000 General Fund Budget 3. Resolution to Adopt the 2000 Special Revenue Funds Budgets A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 1999 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2000 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the final 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000, is determined to be as follows: GENERAL FUND - Operations PIR FUND - Infrastructure - Storm Drainage PIR FUND - Infrastructure - Roads PARK FUND - Land Acquisition & Development $1,858,410 45,000 35,450 5.000 TOTAL GENERAL LEVY $1.943.860 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS G.O. 1992 Sewer Improvement Bond G.O. 1995 (1985) Refunding Bonds G.O. 1997 Sewer Improvement Bond G.O. 1999 Sewer Improvement Bond G.O. 1995 (1989 Water) Refunding Bonds 45.000 15.000 15.000 19,700 75.000 TOTAL BOND INDEBTEDNESS $ 169.700 BONDS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS H.R.A. Building Bond 1991 250.000 $ 250.000 TOTAL ALL LEVIES »2-3«.560 The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 13, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor PINALTAX 00 A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2000 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVEDy by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 2000 Special Revenue Funds budgets are determined to be as follows: Estimated Revenues Park Improve & Eouin Outlav Building Cap Outlav Taxes - General $5,000 Interest Income 6,450 $ 20,240 $ 136,000 User Fees / Loan Payment 12,660 Park Dedication Fees 50,000 Transfers from other Funds - -105,000 Use of Fund Balance 1.550 Total Revenues L 63.000 $ 137.900 s 136.000 Appropriated Expenditures Geneiul Government $$ 20,600 $ Public Safety 1,100 - - Streets 81,350 - - Parks & Recreation 63,000 m »- - Transfers to other Funds m m 130,000 Increase to Fund Balance • «34.850 6.000 Total Expenditures i 137-TOO S 136.000 I Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 13, 1999. AITE.aT Linda S. Vee, City Clerk SPECIALS 00 Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin. Minnesota that the 2000 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows: FSTIMATRD REVENUES Taxes - General $1,858,410 Licenses and Permits 264,000 Intergovernmental 563,780 Charges for Services 1,108,390 Fines and Forfeits 8L000 Interest Income 100,000 Miscellaneous 29,900 Use of Fund Balance 45.000 TOTAL S4.053.480 APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURES General Government $ 847,430 Public Safety 2,279,410 Street Maintenance 519,040 Parks and Recreation 65,820 Recycling Program 79,580 Engineering - Unallocated 9,150 Reimbursable Expenditures 56,050 Special Projects and Contingency 92,000 Transfers To Other Funds 105.000 TOTAL S4.053.480 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 13, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk GENTfNOOO Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor COOMrif iiiiccTIMQ DEC 1 3 W99 s ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Cl i» -------- MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present; Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Richard Flint, Charles Kelley, and Barbara Peterson. Representing Staff were City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Administrator Ron Moorsc, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Director of Public Services Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA (#1) APPROVE/AMEND Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the addition of 9A, #2438,4680 and 4720 Bayside Road to tonight's agenda. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. Items 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9A, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14, 15. 16, 17, 19. 21, 22, 23,24, 25, and 26 were added to the Consent Agenda. Sheila Miller inquired about Item # 10, noting that they did have some concerns regarding the costs involved. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City Council is merely approving a feasibility study for this project and not commencement of the project at this time. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES '(#2) Special Council Meeting of November 4,1999 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting of November 4, 1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1 I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 *(^3) Regular Council Meeting of November 8,1999 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of November 8,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Irene Silber, Representative Silber thanked the City Council on behalf of the Parks Commission for acquiring the land in Navarre. Silber also extended thanks to the Public Works Department for cleaning up the Navarre Park. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City of Orono is in the process of doing due diligence on the condition of soils, with the purchase of the land being contingent upon the results. Mayor Jabbour stated he has requested Peter Johnson to appear tonight to speak on the Dakota Rail to Trail project. Peter Johnson stated he is an interested citizen who has been attending the meetings regarding the Dakota Rail to Trail. Johnson stated that the railroad had indicated they were going to discontinue service on the line due to the poor condition of the tracks, vvhich has now been retracted by the railroad due to a commitment by 3M to allow the railroad to transport fuel oil, which will increase traffic on the railroad line by approximately 60 to 75 carloads per year. Johnson indicated that Mn/DOT has written a letter to the Rail America putting them on notice that if the operations of the railroad cease, they will not be able to retain their interests in the real estate. Johnson commented that there still exists a significant amount of railroad line that is in disrepair, which tends to cause derailments. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether they still have a self-imposed moratorium on hauling of hazardous materials. Johnson stated that the self-imposed moratorium is still in effect, but that the shippers would like the railroad to resume hauling the hazardous materials. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the fuel oil would be considered a hazardous material. Johnson remarked that he is unsure at this point whether that would be considered a hazardous material by the railroad and is dependent on whether tlie flash point of the fuel oil is below 200 in order for it to be classified as a hazardous materiai. Mayor Jabbour stated that the railroad is interested in recouping its investment in the real estate. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22,1999 (Park Commission Comments, Continued) Johnson commented in his view Hennepin Parks or the DNR should give Rail America an alternative use for this land, noting that the land will be conveyed to Rail America free and clear if they continue to run the railroad until the year 2008 or 2009. Mayor Jabbour indicated that he will continue to pursue this project. Johnson stated that if there is a serious derailment, in his opinion Rail America will discontinue operating this railroad. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative McMillan addressed the City Council regarding the situation with Big Island, noting that the LMCD Board has agreed to review the use of safety lanes in this area and the Board should be ready to vote on this issue hopefully in December. McMillan stated in her view this is a good attempt by the LMCD to try to resolve some of the safety issues and problems encountered by the water patrol. McMillan stated that one of the ways to approach this situation is to educate the public once an ordinance is adopted by the LMCD. McMillan commented in her opinion the residents will appreciate the access. McMillan stated the LMCD is also looking at different ways to raise additional money for safety enforcement as well as reviewing the issue of licensing to increase public awareness as it relates to safety on the lake. Mayor Jabbour commented that the special deputy law is being challenged currently, but that the City of Orono still needs to increase the amount of exposure by the police department on Lake Minnetonka and to find ways in which they can show their support of the police. Jabbour suggested that the LMCD consider sending the fees collected by the LMCD to the sheriffs department to help offset the costs of enforcement on the lake. McMillan stated that the LMCD will also be letting bids for the purchase of a new milfoil harvester. Sansevere inquired what is done with the milfoil once it is harvested. McMillan stated for the most part the milfoil is transported out to the arboratium where it is allowed to dry and basically turns to dust. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (LMCD, Continued) Kelley commented that he was surprised at the low attendance records of some of the members on the LMCD Board. Mayor Jabbour stated that the LMCD needs to have a leader who has a vision of what the future of the LMCD is, noting that environmental issues are becoming very important in the minds of a lot of residents in the area. McMillan commented that the cities and residents need to continue to manage the natural resources that exist in the area for future generations and not to take them for granted. Mayor Jabbour thanked McMillan for her efforts on the LMCD Board. Flint commended McMillan on her fine attendance record. PARK COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS Ted Edin, Casco Point, indicated that he was interested in serving on the Park Commission as he enjoys the outdoors and is looking for a meaningful cause to which he could devote some of his time. Edin commented that he is basically retired and would be able to devote sufficient time to this cause. Edin stated that he is unsure what direction the City of Orono would like to see pursued as it relates to the local parks, but indicated he would be willing to follow the direction of the City Council in that regard. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City of Orono's philosophy regarding its local parks is changing somewhat and that the City is in the process of amending their comprehensive plan to reflect that change. Jabbour indicated that the majority of Orono’s parks tend to be more passive and have been acquired by the City through the generous donations of the citizens in this area. Edin stated that he is a hard worker and would be devoted to the improvement of the parks. Flint advised Edin that the Parks Commission is an advisory board, with the City Council making the final decision as it relates to the parks. Flint stated that the City attempts to get a broad geographical representation on the Parks Commission, noting that currently one member on the Commission lives in the Casco Point area Flint commended Edin on his interest in becoming involved with the activities of the City. Mayor Jabbour thanked Edin for appearing before the City Council. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (Park Commission Applicant Interviews, Continued) Rick Meyers, Navarre, stated that he is happy with the progress being made on the parks in Orono and the efforts to amend the comprehensive plan to reflect the changing philosophy of the City as it relates to parks. Meyers commented that people tend to identify with the neighborhood parks and that he envisions the parks becoming a community focal point for the various neighborhoods. Meyers indicated that he is willing to continue to pursue the Dakota Rail to Trail project, noting that he is a member of the ad hoc committee for this project. Meyers commented that the addition of a bike/hiking trail in this area would be a good asset to the community. Flint thanked Meyers for his efforts in working with the City, noting that the City is interested in getting some participation from the residents in the Navarre area. Flint noted that the Parks Conunission acts as an advisory board, with the City Council having the final authority. Mv'v^rs commented that the Parks Commission and City Council need to work together towards a common goal. Meyers stated he is willing to abide by the decisions of the City Coufiid. Mayor Jabbour thanked Meyers for appearing before the City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Bill Stoddard, Representative Bill Stoddard stated he would be available for questions at tonight's meeting. Mayor Jabbour commended the Planning Commission for their fine efforts on the Adult Use Ordinance recently adopted by the City of Orono. PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(#4) #2398 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARUNCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4385 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4385, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Permit Land Alteration Within a City Protected r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (#2398, Wayzata Country Club, Continued) Wetland and a Conditional Use Permit to Permit Land Alteration to Permit the Expansion of Two Ponding Areas for the Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#5) #2525 LARRY JACOBSON AND VICKIE O’NEILL, 635 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4386 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4386, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Permit a Side Yard Setback to Allow a 612 Square Foot Two-Stall Attached Garage for the Property Located at 635 Ferndale Road North. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#6) #2530 WILLUM WEAR, 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCE Troy Ramhilt, Conoco owner, was present. Weinberger remarked that little progress has been made on the canopy lights with Mr. Wear, noting that City Staff is attempting to work with the Applicant on finding alternative lighting. Mayor Jabbour noted that the lighting must be approved in order to be in compliance with the conditional use permit. Ramhill indicated that he is not aware of the problem concerning the lights, noting that he was under the impression that they had previously been approved. Mayor Jabbour stated that the lights are supposed to be recessed can lights with the light reflected down towards the ground rather than out. Jabbour stated he receives a number of calls per day regarding this issue. Kelley stated that William Wear has been made aware of the situation and is obligated to bring the lights into compliance Kelley commented that the occupancy permit should not t»ave been issued until everything was in compliance. Mayor Jabbour noted that the City has sent Mr Wear a letter notifying him of the situation. Ramhill commented that Wear is having problems with the installer of the canopy. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City Council cannot approve the signage until the other item is brought into compliance ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (#2530 William Wear, Continued) Weinberger noted that the requested signage would be a conditional use. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated that the City Council may elect to revoke the conditional use permit if the owner of the property is not in compliance with the City's terms and conditions. Barrett suggested that the City Council table this item until January to give the property owner time to resolve the situation. Kelley commented that he is not in favor of the type of signage being proposed for this site. Ramhill stated that they have downsized the sign significantly to bring the property into compliance, noting that he is planning to erect a monument type sign. Bill Stoddard, Planning Commission Representative, stated the Planning Commission reviewed the previous resolution that had been approved for this property, which allowed 573 square feet of signage, and the requirements allowed under the current ordinance, which allows up to a maximum of 380 square feet of signage. Stoddard noted that the Applicant has reduced the total signage on this property at the request of the Planning Commission. Mayor Jabbour suggested that the owner of the Conoco Station turn off the canopy lights at night until the situation is resolved. Ramhill commented that he has attempted to improve the property by removing the old signs and installing a new canopy with recessed lights as well as a new sign. Ramhill indicated that for security purposes a well-lit area is desirable. Ramhill reiterated that he was operating under the assumption that the light situation was in the process of being resolved, and requested that his sign be approved. Mayor Jabbour stated since the property owner is operating with a conditional use permit, the property must be brought into compliance prior to any new conditional use permits being issued on the property. Jabbour pointed out that the existing conditional use permit can be revoked if the property is not in compliance with the required terms and conditions. Flint stated that the light situation is an important issue and needs to be resolved before approval on this application can be granted. Sansevere suggested that Ramhill work with Wear to resolve this issue. Ramhill commented that he was unaware that the lights were an issue with the adjoining land owners. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2530,2160 Wayzata Boulevard, to allow the Applicant time to resolve the lighting situation. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 *(#7) #2542 BRUCE HEDBLOM AND CAROL CLINE-HEDBLOM, 2601 CASCO POINT ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 4387 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4387, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Allow the Removal of a Deck and to Construct a New Deck and Three Season Porch for the Property Located at 2601 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#8) #2545 LOU AND MARILYN FEGERS, 3590 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4388 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4388, a Resolution Granting Variances to Hardcover to Allow for Construction of a Two-Stall Attached Garage for the Property Located at 3590 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#9) #2546 CHRISTINE WOOD, 4005 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4389 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4389, a Resolution Granting Variances to Street Lot Line Requirements and Hardcover to Allow for Construction of a Detached Garage and Storage Addition for the Property Located at 4005 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#9) MICHAEL SLETTEN AND MARY K. SLETTEN AND B. PETER ACHEY, 4680/4720 BAYSIDE ROAD - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - SECOND EXTENSION TO EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4390 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4390, a Resolution Granting a Second Extension of the Effective Period of Final Subdivision Approval for a Lot Line Rearrangement at 4680/4720 Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Flint stated that Minnetonka is in the process of adopting an open space ordinance Flint indicated that he will supply the members of the City Council with a copy of the ordinance once approved. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (Mayor/Council Report, Continued) Mayor Jabbour suggested that the City Administrator obtain a copy of the ordinance for distribution to the City Council. Sansevere commented that he would be in favor of adopting some type of administrative approval for some of the applications that appear before the Planning Commission. Mayor Jabbour stated that since the public hearing is held at the Planning Commission level, it is necessary to hear the applications. Jabbour commented that this issue has been reviewed in the past. Stoddard stated that the Planning Commission is interested in looking at other communities who have a consent agenda for the Planning Commission to see if a similar one could be adopted in Orono. Stoddard indicated that they would like to eliminate some of the easier applications, if possible, in an effort to reduce the amount of time spent at the meeting. Sansevere requested that City Administrator take this item under consideration. Gaflffon stated that he would be willing to identify a list of items that could be dealt with by City Staff, noting that some changes to the City Codes may be necessary. Mayor Jabbour commented that he is comfortable with the present City Staff and would be willing to pursue this, noting that this item may need to be revisited periodically if City Staff changes. Jabbour suggested that the City Administrator could also review those items. Flint commented that he has confidence in the present City Staff and Planning Commission which enables the City Council to place a large number of items on the consent agenda. Gafffon indicated he would be willing to look at this issue after he has completed reviewing the City's Comprehensive Plan. Moorse suggested that this item could be reviewed by the City Council on an annual basis. Sansevere commended the Planning Commission for their fine efforts and inp:.t on the various applications. Mayor Jabbour suggested that the Applicants be informed that they should attempt to have their application comply as much as possible before it is brought before the Planning Commission to eliminate the need for them to reappear before the Planning Commission. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (Mayor/Council Report, Continued) Sansevere inquired whether the Cops in School grant applies to both the Mound and Orono School Districts. Moorse indicated that the grant applies on!> to the Orono School District. Moorse noted that Minnetrista has received the same gram and will be providing funding for this program to the Mound School District. Sansevere suggested that the Planning Commission be notified if a particular item is in litigation before the application is heard. Moorse commented that generally the Chair of the Planning Commission is made aware of that fact. Mayor Jabbour stated he wr<: approached by a resident who implied that the dock access on Big Island was being solely ✓en by himself and that there was a conflict of interest that exists. Jabbour commentec his opinion a conflict of interest does not exist, and that he will continue to work diiigentl' i this item to find a desirable permanent solution regarding dock access as it relates to the dlocked property owners. Sansevere commented • as view the Planning Commission took a good approach to the situation by requestinr .at the property owners reach an amicable solution among themselves. Mayor Jabbour stat* . in his opinion there are only two available sites for a dock access on Big Island. Jabbr commented that he hopes the residents are able to resolve this issue. ENGINEER ZPORT *(#10) Rer est for Sewer Connection - 800 Brown Rond South Sansever noved, Peterson seconded, to approve the use of one sewer unit for connect! of 800 South Brown Rond to Sanitary Sewer, with the Property Owner being Assesse or 100 Percent of the Sewer Extension from the end of the Webber Hills Sewer oject. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#1 Pay Request #1 - Well #1 Maintenance Repairs F severe moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #1, Navarre Well #1 Maintenance and Pump Repairs Project to Alberg Water Services, Inc., in the amount of $7,083.20. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 *(^12) Request for Payment - Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #3, Orono Orchards Sanitai> Sewer Project to Widmer, Inc., in the Amount of S76,S70.28. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. *(#13) Request for Payment #1 - Stubbs Bay Road Cul>de-Sac Project Sansevere moved, Petenon seconded, to approve Request for Payment #1, Stubbs Road Cul-de-Sac Project to Buffalo Bituminous, Inc., in the Amount of S12,SS4.2S. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#14) Approve Easement for Stubbs Bay Cul-de-Sac Project Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize payment of S380.00 to Stephen & Noreen Krogness for an Easement to Construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(^15) 2000 FEE SCHEDULE - ORDINANCE AND SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 194, SECOND SERIES, FOR PUBLICATION Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt ORDINANCE and SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 194, SECOND SERIES, an Ordinance Adopting the 2000 Fee Schedule and Repealing Ordinance No. 181, Second Series; No. 190, Second Series: and 192, Second Series. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#16) PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CONTRACT RENEWAL Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Renewal of the Contract with Ken Potts for Prosecution Services for the Year 2000 at a cost of $28,700.00, and to Authorize the City Administrator to Sign the Renewal Agreement. VOTE: Ayes, Nays 0. *(#17) CONSOLIDATION STUDY GRANT REQUEST - RESOLUTION NO. 4391 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4391, a Resolution Requesting Funding From the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation to Assist with Costs Associated with the Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (#18) PARK COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Mayor Jabbour commented in his view Rick Meyers would be a good addition to the Parks Commission and is knowledgeable about Orono's parks. Jabbour stated he elected not to appoint him in the past due to his short residency in the area. Peterson stated she was supportive of Meyers for this position. It was the consensus of the City Council to appoint Rick Meyers to the Parks Commission. Peterson moved, Flint seconded, to appoint Rick Meyers to the Parks Commission, effective immediately. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. Moorse stated that the City will send the applicants a letter informing them of tonight's action. Sansevere requested that the City Administrator also call Ted Edin and thank him for his interest in the position as well as the reasons why Meyers was appointed. *(#19) RESIGNATION OF FULL-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ROBYN HOECHST Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to accept the resignation of Robyn Hoechst, Community Service OlTIcer, effective December 1, 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#20) PERSONNEL ACTION - KRIS KNOLLENBERG, POLICE RECORDS CLERK Moorse stated that Kris Knollenberg has reported a work-related injury, which has left her unable to perform her Job duties. Moorse indicated that Knollenberg is pursuing this matter through the Worker's Compensation Division and is attempting to find other employment. City Staff is recommending that she be terminated from the police records position. Sansevere inquired whether some of the newer technology would enable her to perform this job. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, slated he has reviewed this situation with City Staff for a number of months, noting that he is not aware of any technology at this time that would enable the employee to fulfill the requirements of the position Barrett stated that this is a critical position for the police department and they need to have it filled by the spring. Barrett remarked that the employee has only recently been given a statement by her doctor, and unfortunately there is not sufficient work within her work restrictions to enable her to play a productive role in ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 (1^20 Personnel Action - Knollenberg, Continued) accomplishing the work of a police clerk. City Staff has also attempted to review other positions within the City to see whether they would accommodate her work restrictions. Barrett stated the applicant is still able to receive worker's compensation support and training as well as rights that are available to her to appeal this decision should she so desire. Sansevere inquired whether the City has exhausted all other options. Moorse indicated that they have looked at all the options available. Moorse stated in his opinion the present technology would not enable her to perform the duties required in this position. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the termination of Kris Knollenberg from the Police Records Position, efTective November 22, 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#21) 2000 ENGINEERING RATES Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the General Engineering Rates for the Year 2000 as Proposed by Bonestroo Associates. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#22) CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES AND GENERAL SERVICE FEES - RESOLUTION NO. 4392 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4392, a Resolution Providing for the Collection of Delinquent 1999 Charges for Sewer and Water Utility Services, Fees for the Annual Septic Inspection and Recycling Programs, Fees for False Alarms, Developers Improvement Fees, and other General Service Fees. VOTE: Ayes, 5, Nays 0. •(#23) RENEWAL OF POLICE SERVICE CONTRACTS Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Renewal of the Police Services Contracts with the Cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach for the year 2000, and to Approve the Renewal of the Police Service Contract with the City of Long Lake for the Years 2000,2001, and 2002. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1999 *(#24) RENEWAL OF ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE CONTRACTS FOR YEAR 2000 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Renewal of the Animal Control Contracts with the Cities of Excelsior, Tonka Bay, and Shorewood for the Year 2000. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#25) FUNDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY AT 3790 SHORELINE DRIVE - RESOLUTION NO. 4393 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4393, a Resolution Authorizing the Acquisition of the Property at 3790 Shoreline Drive to be Funded Partially from the General Fund and Partially from the Park Fund, and to Amend the 1999 General Fund and Park Fund Budgets to Reflect the $80,000 Expenditure in each of the Funds. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#26) LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST BILLING REGARDING WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB LITIGATION Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the payment of $10,597.29 to the LMCrr for the City's share of the defense costs related to the Woodhill Country Club litigation. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None *(#27) LICENSES On Sale Liquor & Sunday Jimmie's Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Off Sale Liquor 12 Hi Liquor 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard Navarre Liquors, Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 22,1999 (#27 Licenses, Continued) Club Spring Hill Golf Club 725 Sixth Avenue North Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Gambling Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society - Resolution No. 4394 (Jimmie's Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive) Lions Mound Northwest Tonka Club - Resolution No. 4395 (Navarre Lanes, 3435 Shoreline Drive) Kennel Chris Tully 1355 North Arm Drive *(#28) BILLS Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:42 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor COUNCIL MEETING V OfC I 3 1999 ^ MINUTES OF THE TRUTH IN TAXATION Omuivu HELD AT 7:00 P.M. ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 6,1999 IN THE ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS Members present: Mayor Jabbour and Council Members Flint, Kelley, Peterson and Sansevere. Staff present: City Administrator Ron Moorse and Finance Director Tom Kuehn. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Jabbour. Mayor Jabbour indicated the purpose of the Truth In Taxation hearing was to provide an opportunity for citizens to obtain information about the proposed 2000 Budget and Tax Levy. Mayor Jabbour opened the hearing for public comments. As there were no citizens present at the hearing, there were no public comments. Mayor Jabbour closed the hearing at 7:01 p.m. The Council was provided information summarizing the proposed 2000 Budget and Tax Levy. The proposed property tax levy for 2000 is $2,363,500. This is an increase of $71,680 or 3.13% over the 1999 levy. Kelley asked if staff had year-to-date expenditure and revenue information for 1999. Kuehn indicated he is estimating General Fund revenues to be approximately $120,000 over the budgeted amount. Kuehn indicated the year-to-date expenditures have not been determined at this time. Kelley indicated it is important that staff develop some method for more closely monitoring year-to- date expenditures and revenues. Mayor Jabbour indicated that if the consolidation of the Cities of Orono and Long Lake moves forward, there is significant funding available from the State for costs related to implementing the merger. Mayor Jabbour announced that the levy adoption hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 13,1999. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 1 of I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL DEC 1 3 IW9 CITY Op Onui^O DATE: 12/6/99 ITEM NO.: S' Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:Release of Conditional Use Permit from Plat of Crystal Bay Preserve George W. Stickney Zoning District: RR>1B One Family Rural Residential District Summary of Request The Council approved the Plat of Crystal Bay Preserve on August 23,1999. It has been discovered a conditional use permit was granted on the former 250 Old Crystal Bay Road North property. The property was combined with another lot and subdivided by Mr. Stickney as the Plat of Crystal Bay Preserve. The conditional use permit is now recorded on the chain of title for each lot within the subdivision. By request of Mr. Stickney, the subdivider, the conditional use permit has been requested to be released from Lots 1 through 8, Crystal Bay Preserve. A resolution has been attached that would effectively clear the titles of the conditional use permit approved per Resolution No. 1757. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION RELEASING LOTS 1 THROUGH 8, CRYSTAL BAY PRESERVE FROM RESOLUTION NO. 1757 - FILE NO. 2518 WHEREAS, George W. Stickney (hereinafter the "subdivider") has requested a Conditional Use Permit, approved on May 13, 1985 be released within the plat of Crystal Bay Preserve; and WHEREAS, on August 23,1999, the City Council approved the plat of Crystal Bay Preserve; and WHEREAS, the plat of Crystal Bay Preserve included property located at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road legally described as follows: That part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision Two Hundred twenty-nine (229), Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said county, lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel with and 240 feet Southerly of, as measured at right angles to, the North line of said Lot 1 and lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 1,070 feet Easterly of, as measured at right angles to, the West line of said Lot 1 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on December 13, 1999, the Orono City Council releases Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 from the Conditional Use Permit, per Resolution No. 1757 based on the findings noted below: 1.A conditional use permit for a guest apartment was approved by the Orono City Council for property located at 250 Old Cry stal Bay Road. The plat of Crystal Bay Preserve was approved for eight lots, no lots can meet the required area standard for two residential properties. Page 1 of2 J 3. 4. At the time of final plat approval the conditional use permit for the guest apartment was not released and subsequently the conditional use permit is recorded on the titles for Lots 1 through 8, Crystal Bay Preser\e. The subdivider has requested the City of Orono release Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 from document number 1790255 from the conditional use permit for a guest apartment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby releases Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 from the Conditional Use Permit, per Resolution No. 1757, recorded as document number 1790255 in the Hennepin County, Minnesota Office of the Registrar of Titles. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13th day of December, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Gabriel Jabbour, Mavor ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of December, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Citv. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 Application Date: 8/18/99 Completion Date: 8/18/99 Deadline extended to: 12/16/99 MI?ETINQ DEC 1 3 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 12/9/99 ITEM NO.: (p Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning ' Item Description: #2522 The Bancor Group Inc. Southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North (Willow View) Zoning District: RR-1B, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre minimum lot size Comp Plan: Site Area: Exhibits: Rural Service/Rural Residential (2 acre) 58 Acres (51.81 Acres dry buildable) A B C D E Proposed Site Plan (December 3,1999) Preliminary Sanitary Sewer Plan (December 3,1999) Preliminary Street Plan (December 3, 1999) Preliminary Grading Plan (December 3, 1999) Planning Report (November 12,1999) Summary of Request: The Planning Commission has recommended on a vote of 7 to 0 to approve a Preliminary Plat and Planned Residential Development (PRD) for the 58 acre property located at County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Planning Commission had recommended the developer amend the site plans to include a vegetation plan and berming plan to buffer the development from surrounding properties, a trail plan along County Road 6 and Willow Drive, platting a conservation outlot rather than a conservation easement and recommending the subdivider v ork with the City to provide water service to the property. The property would allow 25 lots on 51 acres of diy buildable land, including land dedicated for roadway purposes and for trail space. The developer has implemented the berm and vegetation plan and located a trail plan as recomm.*nded by the Planning Commission. The revised plans, however, indicate the conser\'ation easement remains and no water service has been provided to the site. Engineering Comments: 1.The plan before the City Council is the first to propose a pressure sewer system. Pressure systems are usually only used when gravity does not work and/or the sewer is being provided to a developed neighborhood. The City Engineer has recommended a gravity system be used. The gravity system is appropriate for a new development. There is also less concern for long term maintenance. 2.Due to public health and safety issues it would be appropriate for the City of Orono to require water service to the property. Many of the lots within the development are smaller than the standard RR-IB two acre lot with a 200' minimum width and 30' required side yard setback. Lots less than 1 acre in size will have a side yard setback requirement of 10 ’. There is the potential of locating residential structures with only 20' of spacing. The concern would be fire possibly spreading from one property to another. Municipal water would also allow hydrants to be located along Willow Drive and within the development. 3.The grading plan is for the most part acceptable. The City Engineer has recommended the lowest basement elevations be above the Normal High Level of the ponds and the exposed opening 2' higher the High Water Level of the ponds. Public/Private Road: The Comprehensive Plan states Private Roads shall have a maximum service of approximately ten residential properties. Private roads shall be privately owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. The City will require that private roads be constructed and maintained to City standards. The City will acquire an easement for public ingress, egress and access to all properties. A public road would require the developer to build the road to City standards. Located within the road right-of-way would be public utilities (sewer, water, telephone, gas and/or cable service). The Comprehensive Plan indicates the proposed roadway be a public road. The basis would be the road not being located within the rural area (sewer and water ser\ ice is available) and the roadway would serve 25 individual lots. Another alternative has suggested only one access to Willow Drive and a second, luture access platted through the south end of the development to Kelley Parkway w ith the expectation being the road would be extended to Kelley at the time the property to the south develops. The Comprehensive Plan addresses the issue of routing non-residential traffic through residential neighborhoods. The properties along Highway 12 would be serviced by the extension of Kelley Parkway. If the proposed development had access to Kelley Parkway, traffic from commercial uses and the City Offices would have the option to pass through the residential neighborhood to access County Road 6. Lot Layout and Standards: Most of the larger lots within the proposed Willow View addition are located to the southwest portion of the property. Many smaller lots are located along County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the site plan, but Staff did have concerns with the smaller lots being located closer to the 2 acre residential development existing around the proposed Willow View. A Issues for Discussion 1. 2. 3. 4. Lot Layout and Standards Staff is recommending water service be made available to the property. This proposal indicates each of the 25 lots will be serviced by private wells. The City Engineer and Public Works has recommended the development be served with a gravity sewer system rather the pressure system as proposed on the latest plan. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the road be dedicated as a public road because it serves greater than 10 units. The City has allowed other roads within developments of greater than 10 ur s to be held as private. (Sugarwoods Drive and French Creek, for example) Staff Recommendation Prior to Staff recommending approval for Preliminary Plat the following issues and conditions shall be resolved: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The conservation easement be platted as a conservation outlot to be held in the ownership of the Homeowner's Association. A conservation easement would allow a house to be built to the easement boundary, but the property owner would not be allowed to remove or alter any vegetation to the rear of the house. Platting the outlot would ensure houses would be built allowing a minimum setback to the conservation areas. The lots are developed that would concentrate the least amount of higher density to impact the properties near the intersection of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. Municipal water service be installed on the site to eliminate the need for private wells and provide better fire protection to the site. The utility plans and easements for the Middle School property were adjusted with the expectation Ae Bancor site would develop with municipal water service. The water main should extend westerly and tied into the 12-inch water main installed as part of the Middle School project. The water main alignment should coincide with the utility easement on the school property located just south of the soccer fields. The engineer in his letter dated September 15, 1999 recommends extending the 8- inch water main northerly to the intersection of Willow Drive and County Road 6 for connection to the City of Media's water system. Sewer service shall be a gravity system rather than the proposed pressure system. The latest plan set, dated 12/3/99, indicates a pressure system. A detailed drainage, ponding and grading plan, with drainage calculations be approved by the City Engineer. Trail easements shall be shown and dedicated along Willow Drive and County Road 6. All trails must be located to not interfere with existing vegetation and outside of drainage ways and ditches. 7.The subdivider shall dedicate the additional 10 feet of right of way along County Road 6 per recommendations of Hennepin County. nil!! amB s ssa liiiiliillii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii. IS I c7 s2 IlllllllllllllmiiiiiiiiiijiiiiiiiiiiiiiJ iMiiiiiiiiiii Illlllllllllll iiiiiiiiiiiip Illlllllllllll ■S5, U-V illlli\\[\ To:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 12,1999 Re:#2522 The Bancor Group Inc. Southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North (Willow View) 2Loning District:RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre minimum lot size Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential (2 acre) Site Area:58 Acres (51.81 Acres dry buildable) Proposal:25 Lot Subdivision - Single Family Units Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development Exhibits: A B C D E F G • H I J K Application Planning Commission Minutes (7/19/99) City Council Minutes (8/9/99) Planning Commission Minutes (9/20/99) City Council Minutes (10/25/99) Engineer Comments Lot Layout — 25 Unit Development Plat Map Comprehensive Plan Map Property Owners List Resolution Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.28 - RR-1B Zoning District Standards 2. Section 10.32 - Planned Residential Development The Bancor Group 2445 Count) Road 6 (County Road 6 and Wtllow Drive \orth) Subdivision/Rezoning 11/15/99 pagt-l Summary of Request: The City of Orono has received a Preliminary Plat application for a 25 lot development on 58 acres for property located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed this development as part of an application for rezoning. The proposed rezoning was denied by the City Council on October 25,1999. Please refer to attached Resolution (Exhibit K) adopted by the City Council on November 8,1999. The RR-1B zoning district allows, by conditional use permit, the property to develop as a Planned Residential Development (PRD). The purpose of a Planned Residential Development is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces, to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony, to provide cohesive structure to neighborhood design, to offer recreation opportunities close to home, and to aid in improving the welfare in general of City residents. Section 10.32, Subdivision I. This application requires the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development - The R-IA allows a Planned Residential Development as a conditional use. Section 10.20« Subdivision 3 (H). 2. Class III subdivision approval. 3. Dedication of the platted right-of-way as public roads. The City changed its Comprehensive Plan to reflect medium density residential for the property located directly south of the proposed development. Medium density residential will likely be townhomes. It is the intention to extend Kelley Parkway to Willow from Old Crystal Bay Road. Properties located to the south of Kelley Parkway and north of Highway 12 are guided for office uses. Lot Layout and Standards The lots range in size from 1 acre to over 4 acres. The lots located to the east of the subdivision, on average, are smaller than those lots to the south and west. The PRD would allow the lots to develop at the sizes shown on the site plan, due to the overall density of the subdivision would not exceed one unit per two acres dry buildable. it is to the discretion of the Planning Commission and City Council to determine if the layout is acceptable. Staff has concerns only with Lot 3, Block 3 and Lot 9, Block 1 as the lots would require wetland mitigation for driveway access. The Grading Plan indicates the grading will occur within the wetland. H2322 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and H illon Drive Sordu Subdivision/Re:oninfi li/15 99 page--} Road Dedication and Standards The roads are proposed to be developed to City Standard and dedicated as public streets. The roadways are required to be platted 50' in width and constructed with a 32' road width. The street plans indicate the proposed public roads meet the requirements of the subdivision chapter. Comments from the City Engineer for the latest plan were not available prior to this report being complete, but should be available for the public hearing. The road alignment appears to not create a concern for traffic safety. The Director of Public Services has reviewed the plan and indicated no objection to the proposed road layout and intersection locations. Hennepin County has requested the developer dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way along the centerline of CSAH 6, for a total of 50'. This dedication will accommodate any future roadway upgradir.g, paths, snow storage and utilities. The developer must also receive appropriate permits from the County if any utility, trail or drainage work is required within the right of way. Wetlands and Stormwater Treatment Ponds The site does contain several City protected wetlands. Any proposed alteration of a wetland or land within 26' of the wetland will require a variance from the City. Wetland alteration will also require outside agency review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, DNR and the Corps of Engineers. All wetlands designated by the City of Orono are not included as lot area for the purposes of zoning. Wetland Delineation report, completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company (August 25,1999) has determined the total acreage dedicated to wetlands within the 58 acre site is 6.54 acres. Acres Dry 51.89 Acres Wet 6.54 Total Acres 58.43 Any filling of wetlands will be mitigated on site. The previous proposal mitigated within the open space outlot to the north. The plan proposes three stormwater treatment ponds. Two ponds are located within the conservation outlot and a third is located to the rear of lots 9, 10 and 11 , Block 1 . The Three ponds would treat the runoff for approximately 2/3s of the development. Staff has briefly discussed this issue with Marty Campion, Engineer and Survey for Otto and Associates. Mr. Campion stated most runoff from the southern 1/3 of the development can be treated by a forth pond being located within the 1^2522 The Bancor Group County Road 6 (County^ Road 6 and IVillow Drive Sorthf SubJtvision/Rezomng a 15^99 page-3 conservation easement of Lot 2, Block 1. This pond would capture the runoff from the east-west street and Lots 1 through 4. Only a small portion of lots 5,6 and 7 would not be treated by the pond. The stormwater treatment could be handled within the conservation easement with BMPs prior to entering directly into the wetlands to the south. Grading and Erosion Control Additional concerns addressed by the City Engineer involve the high water level of the ponds on the property. Most of the ponds do not indicate outlots to control the pond level. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for review. Several lots show a lowest floor elevation less than two feet above the high water level of the ponds. More detailed grading plans shall be provided with the final plan set. All grading plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to City Council review of the Preliminary Plat. Access/Streets/T rails No lot within this proposed development would have direct access to Willow Drive or County Road 6. All lots would be required to access a newly platted str jet. The existing grade is generally even, therefore there are no issues with the slope of the proposed streets. Final plans should provide horizontal and vertical curve information for all streets. City code requires that a public street serving more than 10 units shall have a minimum paved width of 32-feet. A trail had appeared along Willow Drive and along the south side of County Road 6 on the original plan set. The intent of the trail was to cotmect to the larger regional system towards the school propert>’ and eventually west to the Baker Regional Park. A second small section of trail was proposed to connect this neighborhood with the school properties. The trail would provide future access to the Middle School property. Easements 1.Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final plat. Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flow age easements across the wetlands and ponding areas located within the development. Language in the easement documents shall restrict land alteration and remov al of vegetation. H2522 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 fCounty Road 6 and Willow Drive \orth) Subdivision/Re zonin ft U/15/99 page^4 3.Trail easements shall be created along Willow Drive and County Road 6 for connection to regional trail systems. The survey shows a proposed trail through the property. Another trail has been proposed to connect the neighborhood to the school property to the west. Park Dedication Fee 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. The City of Orono has established a minimum park dedication fee per lot of $2,900 and a maximum of $4,900 per lot. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Connection The property is located within the MUSA boundary allowing for sanitary sewer connection. The developer will be responsible for providing sewer and water to the site. Sewer is located along Highway 12 and will be installed along Willow Drive to the development. Estimates for sewer and water connection are approximately $9,250 per unit, not including the construction cost. Easements along the streets may not be required for the public utilities if the roads are developed as public streets. The City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary water and sewer plans and has determined edacity exists to allow additional units. In Mr. Kellogg's comments (Exhibit F) he has noted that the proposed temporary bypass lift station along T.H. 12 needs to be in place before sewer service can be provided to the Willow View site. Due to costs the developer has requested the development use priv.'*re wells rather than municipal water service. Issues for discussion 1. 3. Due to the topography of the site, and grading that can occur on site, it appears the property could sustain a development of 25 units. 2. Should the development density include land dedicated for purposes other than open space? Park dedication fee shall be equivalent to 8% of the value of the lot with a maximum of $4,900 per lot or a minimum of $2,900 per lot. The Code does address land dedication for park space rather than a cash contribution. Trail development could potentially reduce the cash portion of the park dedication. *t2522 Tht Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Wdlow Drive \orth) Subdivision Rezomnf^ 11/15/99 page^^5 4. 5. The Planning Commission must determine if a Conditional Use Permit is appropriate for the site. Does the open space being created allow a CUP to be granted? The Code and Comprehensive Plan allow the PRD to be approved as a land conservation tool and to improve the appearance of neighborhoods. Only one open space outlet is being created and the purpose of the outlet is for wetland and ponding use. The original plan for the site indicated trails being located along Willow Drive and CR 6. The latest plan does not address the need for trails. 6. The plan shows lots with the following setbacks. Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Side Adjacent to Street 35 feet 10 feet 30 feet 35 feet Staff has recommended the lots in Block 1 due to an average lot size of over two acres shall require setbacks for the two acre standard. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the proposed preliminary plat be approved, but subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The conservation easement be platted as a conservation outlot to be held in the ownership of the Homeowner’s Association. A conservation easement would allow a house to be built to the easement boundary, but the property owner would not be allowed to remove or alter any vegetation to the rear of the house. Platting the outlot would ensure houses would be built allowing a minimum setback to the conservation areas. A detailed drainage, ponding and grading plan, with drainage calculations be submitted for City Engineer review and approval prior to City Council review. Detailed Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control plans shall be submitted for review a? requested by the City Engineer (Exhibit F). A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for review and approval by Staff. All ponds shall meet NURP standards. Trail easements shall be shown along Willow Drive and County Road 6. This may effect the ponding areas along Willow Drive. i(2522 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive Sorth) Subdivision/ Rezoning 11/15 99 page-6 6. The subdivider shall dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way along County Road 6 per recommendations of Hennepin County. 1^2522 The Bancor Croup 2445 County Road 6 (Count)' Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision/Rezonmg 11/15/99 page^y Ik.1^ ^SZ'2~ Application ft Date Receiyed Amount Paid 9 /7Q—^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ....... , U<. u 2S- 1*8- ■2-3- S*j-<a<sol __________________________Property Identification Number (PDD) Please check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? APPLICANT Name 1 Address 15Z* - wt Phone ('home') isri- io31 Citv ►'<*#*!■« 5 hAw Zip Phone fwork) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name CtA*ri^ r *lo Tv»*w.*4 F pr (>v3 Address H5T>0 U>..t S*-Phone (home) Citv ZipS^*<'‘'‘( Phone (work) o«i - ini (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size i 5-181 (pTi •• Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) '•'f • Division for Tax Purposes . _____ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) X Subdivision for New Building Sites Q Existing Units I 'ew Units Total Units Number of Building Sites ; - * i ■' Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) V Units per t **! Acres t S'. g Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential 3 g- Other (specify) ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 E Steven and Susan Wilson, Continued) The Craflcate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Steven V\^on, Applicant, was present. Weinberger «aled that the Planning Commission and City Council has recently approved a subdivision of a igt line rearamgement for properties located at 325 South Browti Road and 2150 Abingdon Way. C^y Code requires that the Applicants dedicate drainage and utility easements along all newly created property lines, which have been granted along the new property line. However, the previou\under1ying drainage and utility easement along the old property line was not vacated at the Ume the subdivision was approved, which should be vacated. Staff is recommending ap^val of this application. Wilson had no comment. .lawn Inquired whether the Applied would be agreeable to affirming the agreement with Abingdon Way. Wilson staled It would not be an affirm^n, but merely notifying the owners of each lot In this division that they are liable for each easement. Wilson stated he would approach the homeowners association requesting that the 60 foot pathway be eliminated from their agreement, which requires City agreement. Hawn inquired whether that portion was before thaPlanning Commission as part of this application and whether any legal notice must be given to the al^ioining property owners. Gaffron staled that it was, noting that technically actiorNiy the Planning Commission may not be required. Gaffron stated that in his opinion no notice is required. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of A^ication #2474,325 Brown Road South/21 SO Abingdon V/ay, vacating the 10 foot wide dra^ge and utility easement along the previously existing property line between 325 South Bwwn Road and 2150 Abingdon Way based, and as a result of the lot line rearrangement the obligation to maintain Abingdon Way will be maintained solely by Lot 5, west of^^^ east 60 foot line, and not Lot 6. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEV/ (#8) #2505 THE BANCOR GROUP, INC., V/ILLOW DRIVE/6TH AVENUE NORTH - SKETCH PLAN David Newman, Bancor Group, was present, along with Marty Campion, P.E., of Otto 4 Associates. Weinberger stated the Applicant Is proposing to develop a 58 acre parcel located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Applicants have proposed a concept plan to sutdivide the property into 52 lots, with an average density of less than one acre per lot. The property is zoned RR-1B, which requires two acres per unit. The Applicants are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1 A, allowing one acre per unit density, and to develop the Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (^f2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) property as a Planned Residential Development. The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD would allow we property to be developed at one unit per acre, with City sewer and water being available to these proposed units. This property could net sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high v/ater table and soil types present. Weinberger stated that the property to the south may be developed at c with a two acre density development east of V/illow Drive, a low density residential north of County Road 6. and the Oreno School Campus to the west. This development would serve as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east versus the other land uses to the south and west. The Applicants are proposing a plan that would r®sult in the nearest home being located approximately 225 feet from County Road 6. Several berrns are being proposed throughout the development, and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style homes. Access to this development v/ould be off of V/illow Drive, v/ith no aocess off of County Road 6. City Staff recommends that the proposed Intersection between the development and Shadowood Drive be aligned, whether it's through the extension of the northerly road or the other curb cut being relocated further north, to eliminate traffic turning left. The access points are proposed to ce approximately 200 feet apart. Weinberger stated that standard drainage and utility easements would be required, as v/ell as parkland dedication. Weinberger stated the Applicants could have the option of donating 8 percent of the land value or designating a portion of the development for trails. Weinberger stated that the hookup costs for City sewer and v/ater will need to be discussed further. Weinberger noted that the City Council has established less restrictive zoning standards for other PROS, including French Creek and Sugar.vocds. Lindquist commented that he is hesitant to approve rezoning of this area due to the high density housing that is being proposed. Newman stated that the high densihy is necessary due to the connection costs for City sewer and v/ater, noting that they have reviewed the costs involved in this project and that in order to onset their expenses, upper market housing will need to be constructed In this area, Lindquist inquired whether they have calculated the average lot size for this development. Nev/man replied they have not yet made that calculation. Campion stated that they are conle.mplating lots that average around a half-acre, with the smallest being one-third acre, Stoddard commented that he would like to see a residential development in this area. but that in his view the City Council may wish to retain the two acre zoning. Stoddard stated he is the economics involved fer this development, but that he personally would like to see larger lo . Newman stated that this is an expensive parcel of property to develop, and that not all the residences v/ill be constructed v/ith walkouts. Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 ("2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) Campion staled that the walkouts are necessary due to the high water table and soil conditions in the area. Newman stated that they have obtained two sets of soil borings because of the high water table and soils in the area. Hawn commented that the City Is interested In providing more affordable housing and that the proposed high density will present drainage problems. Hawn Inquired whether a landscaping plan has been developed In more depth. Newman stated they have not designed anything specifically for this development at this time. Newman stated In his opinion this site will never be developed for first lime home buyers due to the high costs associated with developing this piece of property and that they are contemplating houses in the $350,000 range. Berg questioned whether the location of the access is an Issue. Berg commented that she would also like to see lower density In this area, noting that in her view some of the proposed lots will be unbulldable due to the small lot size and large pond located in the area. Weinberger staled that the final location of the road will need to be reviewed once the layout of the units is determined. Newman stated they have not reviewed whether the lots contain suitable building pads at this time, which will need to be addressed. Lindquist remarked that the developer will also need to submit a drainage and grading plan, noting that some wetlands do exist In the area. Stoddard stated In his opinion It is doubtful that any zoning under two acres will be approved. Smith commented that the residents are starting to take the view that the holding ponds are a natural feature to the area and should be turned Into private beaches, which should not be encouraged. Smith stated that residents are also hesitant to have trails located close to their homes. Smith stated In her opinion the two acre zoning should be adhered to. Newman stated that he is committed to this project. Page 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 (#2504 Warren and Tana Garrett, Continued) JeN^n stated the Applicants are requesting variances in order to construct a 12 by 20’ home addiub«L an addition to the existing deck, and construction of an inground S'A/imming pool. The initial ap^liMtion by the Applicant included a request to construct a split-rail fence a!on< he property line^^rpm the driveway to the lakashore. The Applicant withdrew the requesl for the fence at the Plannin^iS^mission meeting. The Planning Commisfeiqn recommended approval of the variances for the addition to the house, the deck addition, and theSqcround swimming pool, but recommended denial of the variances to allow construction of a five fob^^igh split-rail fence. Jenson stated that a mature stand oN^ees would prohibit the neighbors from having a view of the new addition and swimming pcol. Garrett commented he has read the resolution'h^re the City Council tonight Garrett stated he will withdraw his application for the fence due to sbqje complaints by one of the neighbors. The fence was designed to help deter trespassers onto h^j^operty from the adjoining Long Lake park, but the number of trespassers has declined this past ye; Mayor Jabbour stated that the City does not like to have fence^^nstructed within 75’ of the lakeshore. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2504, anik^opt RESOLUTION NO. 4332, a Resolution Granting a Variance to the Avera>^akeshore Setock to Allow the Construction of a 12' by 20’ Addition to the Home, an AdditioJK^^he Existing Deck, and an Inground Swimming Pool Surrounded by a Deck, and to Deny the,^^riances to Construct a Five Foot High 3-Rail, Split-rail Fence Along the South Property Ch^from the Driveway to the Lakeshore. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ^ (#9) #2505 THE BANCOR GROUP, INC., WILLOW DRIVE/SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Marty Campion. Bancor Group. v;as present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to construct a 52 lot subdivision consisting of single family units over 58 acres located at the south'.vest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Applicants have submitted a proposal to subdivide the property into 52 lots, an average density of less than cne acre per lot. This is assuming the total property dedicated fcr right-of-v;ay, ponding and v/etlands will exceed six acres on the site. The property is currently zoned RR-1B '■equiring two acres per unit The Applicants are re^uest’ng that the property be rezoned to R-1A to allow one acre per unit density and to develop the prop^y as a Planned Residential Deve'opment. The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the eftecls of urban congestion. A PRD v;ould allow the property to be developed at cne unit per acre while allowing the lots to be less than one acre leaving the remaining land as cpen space by the creation of ^ conservation outlets. City sev;er and water are available to this croperty. Weinberger stated this property would not be able to sustain individual septic systems due to the high water table and soil types present in this area. Weinberger staled that the surrounding properties to this site include a two acre development east *. ■ Pace 7 ^ ~ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) of Willow Drive, low density residential consisting of two acre lots north of County Road 6, the Orono School to the west, and some possible townhome/office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Park'//ay to the south. This property may be appropriate to act as a buffer zone between the mixed uses surrounding the proposed development Mayor Jabbour commented that a prior application was submitted for this property proposing approximately 42 units. Weinberger stated that the prior application proposed two acre density to the north and one acre density to the south, with the property being set up as a PUD. and did not appear before the City Council. Campion, Bancor Group, stated that the wetlands were delineated a number of years ago and that a new v/etland delineation has been undertaken, which, in his opinion, will show that the wetlands are dimir.iohed from what v/as originally charted. • Campion commented that there are a number of benefits to this proposal, such as this property acting as a transitional zone to the surrounding areas, with no access being proposed off of County Road 6. Bancor Group is proposing to preserve the natural environment as much as possible In this area as v;ell as creating a traihvay and open green space in this development. Campion stated due to the costs associated with developing ttiis property with City sewer and v/ater, the higher density is necessary. Campion commented that more housing in this area will be needed due to the new Highway 12 corridor and the displacement of a number of families. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to consider a two-tier zoning for this property. Campion remarked that they are not av/are of the exact amount of wetlands in this area, which v/ould impact the size of the lots, and that if they are required to have a minimum of one acre dry buildable. that v/ould m.ean a significant reduction in the number of lots. Mayor Jabbour inquired vvhelher tne Applicant wished to recess this matter temporarily to discuss some of these issues with the other Bancor representatives. Campion requested that they be a!Iov;ed to discuss this matter. Item #9 follows Item #10. (Recess taken at 8:21 p.m. - 8:31 p.m.) (#10) DNR CONVEYANCE OF LUCE LINE PARCEL TO LONG RIDGE ASSOCIATES Gaffron stated that the DNR has determined that a portion of the south half of the Luce Line right-of-way v;est of the Orono Golf Course was in fact owned by Long Ridge Associates. Long Ridge Associates has agreed to ceed the trail right-of-way to the DNR in exchange for to Long Ridge a portion of the trail right-of-way further east, adjacent to the Orono bridge. The portion to be conveyed to Long Ridge is now and will continue to be used by DN the public as a walking/driving access to the trail with the DNR retaining an easement over the S..-P for these purposes. Page S ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 (#9) #2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Willow Drive/Sixth Avenue North, Continued Campion staled that the consensus of the Bancor Group is that they will not be able to proceed forward with this development if it is reduced by more than four lots. Campion staled that they are looking at approximately .85 dry buiidable acres per lot at this time, noting that the exact amount of wetlands has not been defined. Mayor Jabbour commented in his view his opinion regarding this parcel has changed somewhat over the years due to changes in the community as well as the nevv proposed Highway 12 comdor. Jabbour stated that according to City Code prior developers were given credit for vvellands when City sewer was available. Jabbour commented in his opinion this property should be used as a buffer zone. Campion inquired whether the City Council would be requiring one acre lots for this development. Mayor Jabbour stated this parcel should be developed as a PRD. with an average of one acre per lot. Kelley commented that he personally is not in favor of rezoriing this the two aore zoning maintained. Kelley stated he would be in favor of a PRD with hvo acre zoning. Peterson commented that she also is in agreement v;ith the two acre zoning. Kelley stated that in his view the value of the property should be reduced in order to make this development more economically feasible. Campion stated they will need to address these issues further. Gaffron commented that Sugarwocds was rezoned to one acre density. Mayor Jabbour commented in his opinion the City should provide some »;'9her densi^housing within the City and that the City Council should consider the possibility of rezoning this prop rty. Kelley stated he would be in favcr of clustering units on this property wh^^ch need to run sewer to a large number of residences. Kelley commented he wou i - the two acre zoning for this area and is not in favor of higher density housing in this area. Flint commented that he is troubled by the efforts to keep this area zoned a» this is not a prime piece of real estate and that th.e school and County Road 6 do impact this property. Sansevere stated he is in agree.r.ent with Flint and that in his opinion this property could be rezoned one acre dry buiidable Campion stated that one acre dry buiidable would not allow their proposed development to work, noting that the v/etlands and the streets need to be taken into account favorable towards a development proposing a m.aximum of 44 units. Sansevere commented that the developer is proposing upper middle class housing for this area, Pagel0 • ORONO CrTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 9,1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Continued) noting that he would be in favor of higher density for this area. Mayor Jabbour commented that credit should be given for the streets. Gaffron stated under a PRD the City has allowed credit for roadways, noting that no credit is given under a standard plat for streets. Mayor Jabbour commented that the Applicant will need to appear before the Planning Commission with their proposal once these issues are addressed. Campion stated that they will continue to keep the buffering to the north and east, and will look at trying to achieve a one acre zoning under a PRD with credit being given for the streets. [AYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Maybe Jabbour stated he has been contacted by one of the business owners, the owner of the vacant^mmercial building adjacent to Highway 12 and Industrial Boulevard in Long Lake, regarding*the possibility of constructing a service road to provide additional access to his business from Old CrWal Bay Road. Jabbour stated he explained to the property owner the process that needs to be f^k^ed and the City’s general philosophy regarding this matter. Jabbour cornmented that the City's cuhrent comprehensive plan, which is in the process of being updated, is being made obsolete in part bebwse of the new Highway 12 corridor. tli^the ion area. Jabbour commented tltat the City has taken a position that they do not want an exit ramp from new Highway 12 in this lo^tion. Kelley stated he essentially told thel^resentative the same thing last week. Kelley commented that the traffic counts by Mn/DOT are^t always accurate and that their numbers tend to differ from the County's numbers. Kelley commented«,m his view the new Highway 12 corridor should be constructed first Mayor Jabbour suggested that the City Adminis^tor send a letter to the affected business owners informing them that this issue has bean discussedV(^ that the City Council is interested in their input on this matter. Mayor Jabbour stated he has spo'Ken with the president oN^eat America who has stated that the Dakota Rail will officially be shut down October 15, 19S9. J^bour commented the next step is to meet v/ith Hennepin Parks to discuss the Dakota Rail to Trail p^^ecL Kelley commented that he is a'ware that the Orono Police Departme regarding Big Island. meh^is taking some action .'abbeur stated that the police are aware of the situation and are reviewing\t^i^nctter, Sansevere commented that perhaps the number of boats should be restricted inlijat area. Mayor Jabbour stated that in previous years the Fire Marshall limited the number ofV<^ate^ Page 11 ~ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 20,1999 Haus, Continued) D Haus inquired wlreHis^ilPPfovemenls could be made to the existing garage located on the property. it would need to be applied for prior to any improvements beingWeinberger stated a building made on the garage. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to recomt!tei)jd approval of Application #2521, 4435 Bayside Road, and grant a conditional use pltmii|^permit construction of a garage with living space above it as a guest house on the prop^lfh^^bject to the condition that the guest house be connected to the existing septic systenriwilifijime the new residence is completed. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. -------------------- (Recess taken from 7:28 p.m. - 7:31 p.m.) SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS (#3) #2522 THE BANCOR GROUP, INC., SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILLOW DRIVE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD 6 - CLASS III SUBDIVISION, 7:31 p.m. - 9:03 p.m. David Newman and Marty Campion, The Bancor Group, appeared. Weinberger stated the Bancor Group has submitted a preliminary plat application for a 58 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North which proposes to sutxlivide the prop arty into 49 lots, with an average density of approximately one acre per dw-alling ur :t. The Applica. is are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1A to allow the one acre per unit density and develop the property as a Planned Residential Development. A PRD is a conditional use in the R-1 A District. The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD would allow the property to be developed at one unit per acre, however, the average lot size would be less than one acre. The remainder of the property would be held by the Homeo\..ners Association as open space. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing access through a newly platted street, with no access to this development off of Willow Drive or County Road 6. However, on five lots Willow Drive would be considered the rear yard. The proposed rezoning of the site would allow a higher density development. The property could not sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high water table and poor soil types present. It may be appropriate to utilize this property as a buffer zone belweeri the different uses surrounding the proposed development, with two acre density east of Willow Drive, two acre density north of County Road 6, the Orono School Campus to the west, and possible townhome/office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway to the south. Rezoning the property to sustain higher density housing may be appropriate for this area because sanitary sewer is available and would be a condition of approval. Development of this area as a PRD would also allow for the creation of conservation outlots along County Road 6 and Willow Drive, which would allow the highest concentration of lots being located within the interior of the property. The City ’s Comprehensive Plan suggests that this area might be suitable for a PUD. Newman stated following their last appearance before the Planning Commission, they have reduced the proposed number of lots for this development to 49 and relocated the access north. Newman stated this development would serve as a transition zone between the two acre density areas to the Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 20,1999 (#2522 The Bancor Group, Continued) east and north and the school to the west and possible townhome/office use to the south. Newman stated due to the high water table and poor soils In this area, it is necessaiy to develop this area with City sewer and water, which dictates the need for higher density housing in an effort to help offset those connection costs. This development would also offer an opportunity for those people being relocated due to the Highway 12 project to remain in this community. Newman commented in his opinion this development would not significantly impact negatively on the traffic situation in the area and would be an asset to the community by providing higher income housing. The concept plan proposes a trailway to the east and north as well as berming and landscaping in an effort to help buffer the area from Willow Drive and County Road 6. Extensive open spaces are being provided as well as ponding and protection to the wetlands. Newman stated the Bancor Group has attempted to comply with C. >no's standardo and would be a valuable addition to the neighborhood and community. Campion stated they have received a copy of the City Engineer's letter and all the issues raised will be addressed at the time of final plat. Campion indicated they are willing to work with the City Engineer in an effort to resolve these issues. Newman commented since this is only the preliminary plat stage, some of these issues will be addressed later on in the application process. Hawn stated that due to the number of people in the audience who wish to speak regarding this application, it will be necessary to limit public comment to five minutes per speaker. Steve Johnston, 2330 Shadywood Drive, stated he is representing a number of people tonight, noting that he has resided in Orono for 12 years, is a civil engineer by occupation, and has become familiar with Orono's Comprehensive Plan and ordinances over the years. Johnston remarked the Comprehensive Plan focuses on what is known as an urbanization cycle, which calls for extension of City services into areas where they are anticipating higher density housing. Johnston pointed out that the original Comprehensive Plan reiterated time and time again that urbanization will not be expanded into existing rural areas, which overtime has been revised and now allows for carefully integrated developments to limit the adverse affect on the surrounding areas, with a desire to maintain open spaces and natural environment as much as possible. Johnston noted that the sewer policy does call for City sewer in developments where the land Is not able to support their own individual septic systems due to poor soils or high water table. Johnston reviewed an overhead depicting various proposals prepared by a consultant hired by the City on how this area can best be developed, noting that the number of lots proposed by the City consultant range from 14 lots to 20 lots, with the owner of the property proposing 22 lots at that time. Johnston stated when Amendment Two to the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City. It was determined that the City should remain at the two acre zoning. Johnston remarked that this area has been designated as a buffer area due to the wetlands and open spaces in this area. In order for rezoning to occur, the question normally posed to the Planning Commission is what conditions have changed since the adoption of Amendment Two which would dictate the need for rezoning of this area. Johnston stated in his opinion the ccr.ditions calling for two acre zoning have not changed and that this area shouH remain zoned at two acres in an effort to preserve the natural environment. Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 20.1999 (#2522 The Bancor Group, Continued) Johnston indicated that although overall the development Is catling for one tot per acre, the average density under this PRD would be approximately .55 acres, with the smallest tot being .4 acres. In the past Orono has suggested that every tot have its own recreational area, which is doubtful for this development due to the smalt lots being proposed. Johnston pointed out that there is not a significant buffer area being proposed between the residences and Willow Dn'^e. which should be addressed. Johnston stated he would like to reserve the right to speak again should the Planning Commission indicate a willingness to vote in favor of the rezoning. John Grobe, 2350 Shadowood Drive, presented the Planning Commission with a petition signed by 48 residents in the area opposed to developing this area into less than two acre lots. Grobbe indicated that a larger number of residents would probably be in attendance at tonight's meeting but are unable to attend due to the open house being held at the school tonight. Grebe stated that he moved to Orono because of the smaller community size and the rural environment, which he would like to see preserved as much as possible. Grobe encouraged the Planning Commission to deny this application, noting that in the past four years, all the developments which have occurred in the City has been at two acres or more, and that the impact of this development needs to be considered. Eric Menge, 340 Tumham Road, stated he Is a life-long resident of Orono and would like to see Orono remain as more of a rural type community, with higher density housing being avoided. Tom Carlson stated he is moving to Orono due to the rural natural of the community. Carlson remarked he had the understanding that Orono had a two acre minimum zoning requirement, and if higher density is proposed for this area, it may open the way for other developers to propose higher density housing for the Orono community. Carlson encouraged the Planning Commission to stick to the two acre zoning requirements. A number of residents in the audience indicated that they would like to see the two acre zoning preserved in Orono, and encouraged the Planning Commission to deny this application due to the high density housing being proposed for this area. Donna Crotteau, 2650 Silver View, commented that there are other developments that exist in Orono which are comprised of less than two acres, and that this development would help generate additional tax dollars for the City. Laurie Collick, Medina, stated she would like to see this area preserved due to the natural feeding area that currently exists for the wildlife. Collick commented she would like to see the rural nature of Orono preserved as much as possible, and if this development is approved, it will open the door for more requests for higher density housing. Collick expressed concerns about the impact that this development will have on the Orono Schools, noting that there currently is a shortage of classroom space, and that this development will also have a negative impact on the amount of traffic in the area. Collick urged the Planning Commission to deny this application. Cathy Johnston, 2336 Shadywood Drive, commented that Amendment Two to the Comprehensive Plan does recognize one acre housing, noting that this development will be hidden by a number of trees and is located close Long Lake, which has higher density housing. Newman, Bancor Group, stated that the realignment of Highway 12 does present a basis upon which the comprehensive plan needs to be reviewed and perhaps revised. Newman commented that they acknowledge the neighborhoods’ concerns regarding this development, but that an Page 9 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 20.1999 (#2522 The Bancor Group, Continued) overall view of the development should be taken, noting that many of the lots will overlook open space. Newman remarked due to the high costs associated with developing this parcel of property and the poor soils and high water table in the area, it is impossible to develop this property at a lower density. Hawn commented that there are certain housing needs In Orono which are not currently being met, but that this proposal in her opinion does not address those housing needs. Hawn stated there needs to be a compelling reason to revise the Comprehensive Plan, which in her opinion has not been demonstrated tonight. Hawn thanked the people in the audience for their interest in this proposed development and in the future development of Orono. Kluth commented that the Planning Commission serves as an advisory body to the City Council, and in his opinion it is not within their Jurisdiction to change the comprehensive plan. Smith stated that the Planning Commission does need to look at the future needs of the residents in Orono, both near term and long-term, and that the City is receptive is looking at other types of housing in Orono. Stoddard stated in his opinion the proposed housing is too dense for this area but does make good use of the City sewer and water that is available in the area. Stoddard commented he is in favor of two acre zoning, but would be willing to consider a proposal calling for 39 or fewer units on this property. Lindquist acknowledged that developments are generally economically driven, but that the Planning Commission does not look at the economic side of the proposed development but rather the impact that the development will have on the community. Lindquist commented that in his opinion the housing density should be reduced somewhat, with this high density housing being unacceptable in his view. Newman requested that direction be given from the Planning Commission on what they would like to see for this site. Kluth stated that the Planning Commission is not in a position to develop plans for a particular area, but that in his opinion housing in this area should be limited. Hawn stated that personally she would be interested in seeing smaller, more maintenance free housing for this area, with plenty of open space being provided. Kluth moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2522, Southwest Comer of Willow Drive North and County Road 6, Class 111 Subdivision. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. s (Recess taken from 9:03 p.m. - 9:08 p.m.) CONTINUED NEW BUSINESS"^''PMBLIC HEARINGS (#6) #2523 RONALD AND RITA ZEBECKr9^lNtg3HURST TRAIL - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 9:08 p.m. - 9:41 p.rn/^ Tim Oberg, Southview Design, was present. Page 10 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25.1999 ZONING ADNnNi:OR’S REPORT E “(#4) #2519 MATTHEW AND ROBK^TALOCH, 4705 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4366 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESQJ^^ION NO. 4366, a Resolution Granting an Amendment to a Variance to Permit ColMcuction of an Accessory Structure Between the Principal Building and the Street. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. >1^ (#5) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC, COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILLOW VIEW Marty Campion and David Newman, Bancor Group, Inc., were present. W'einberger stated that the Applicant has submitted an application for a 5i acre parcel located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Planning Commission and City Council has reviewed the proposed development as a sketch plan. Weinberger stated that the preliminary plat application requires a number of approvals for the subdivision, namely, rezoning of the property which is currently zoned RR- IB. The Applicants are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-IA to allow one acre per unit densit>- and to de\ :lop the property’ as a Planned Residential Development. The surrounding properties to this site .nclude two acre density east of Willow Drive, low density residential north of Count>‘ Road 6, the C.'ono School Campus, with the future middle school site to the west, and possible townhome or office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway to the south. It may be appropriate to utilize this prope.ty as a buffer zone berveen the mi.xed uses surrounding the proposed development. Development of this site as a PRD w ould allow for the creation of conservation outlots along Countj- Road 6 and Willow D.-’we, with the highest density of lots being located within the interior of the property. The Planning Commission has reviewed this application and is recommending denial on a six to zero vote based on the following: One, the Planning Commission is not in a position to change the Comprehensive Plan; tw o, if the property is rezoned, it should be to provide an alternate housing style or provide for a housing need not currently being met. and three, the proposed number of lots may be loo dense. Weinberger noted that municipal sew er and w ater are available to this site, with the proposed development of the property' taking advantage of the services available. Weinberger stated that the Applicants have provided three rev ised concept plans based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission and comments from the adjacent property' owners Mayor Jabbour indicated that he would rather not review the revised concept plans at this time due to the fact that a public hearing has not been held which would enable the general public to comment on the revised concept plans. Jabbour noted that the City Council generally follows the recommendations of the Planning Commission and that their input is desired before a decision Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25.1999 (#2522 Bancor Group, Continued) is made on any application. Newman stated that he agrees philosophically with what Mayor Jabbour is saving, but that in his opinion there is not a need for another public hearing to discuss the revised concept plans since the Bancor Group has taken the recommendations and comments from the neighbors into account when revising the concept plan, which is the purpose behind a public hearing. Newman stated he has met with Johnston, one of the residents representing a number of the neighbors, and rev iewed the revised concept plans with him. The suggested changes by Johnston have been incorporated into the revised concept plans as well, with the revised concept plans being distributed to the adjoining property owners. Newman commented in his opinion it would be appropriate to look at the revised concept plans at this time since the directions of the Planning Commission and comments from the adjoining property owners have been taken into account when the new plans were b'*’ng developed. Mayor Jabbour reiterated that he would like the input from the Planning Commission on the revised plans before the Citv* Council proceeds on this application. Flint commented that he would also like the input of the Plaiming Commission before this item is discussed further. Flint indicated that at this time he would not be in favor of rezoning the property. Sanseverc stated that he attended the Planning Commission meeting when this item was discussed and that he would like to get input from the Planning Commission and the general public before he makes a final decision regarding this application. Mayor Jabbour inquired of the City Attorney whether the rights of the Applicant would be violated if the Citv* Council does not proceed forw ard with this application at this time. Tom Barrett, Cit>- Attorney, stated due to the inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the City Council has the right to deny the application. Barrett stated the issue before the City Council at this time is whether the property should be rezoned. Barrett inquired whether a formal request for rezoning of the propert>’ has been received by the City. Weinberger stated that as part of this application the Applicant is requesting rezoning of the site. Barrett indicated that rezoning is mainly a political judgment based on the direction that the members of the Citv- Council would like to see the City go. Newman commented that he would be willing to waive any judicial rights if the Citv’ Council wishes to return this application to the Planning Commission. Mayor Jabbour stated that it would be his prei'erence that this application go back before the Planning Commission Jabbour commented that his vote will not be persuaded due to the popular opinion of the residents, but will be based on what is best for the Citv of Orono Jabbour stated Page 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25,1999 (1^2522 Bancor Group, Continued) it is Kis opinion that rezoning of the property for this type of housing is not the best option for the City, noting that it impacts the adjoining properties, an alternate t>pe of housing is not b;ing provided vvith this development, and there is a lack of open space being proposed \vith the subdivision. Newman stated that the plan being presented tonight is different due to the comments of the public and the Planning Commission, noting that the Bancor Group is willing to address the concerns and desires of the residents of Orono. Newman remarked that he was not aware that there was adequate support for alternate style housing on this site. Mayor Jabbour commented that he feels the City Council should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan as well as being proactive in identifying the future needs of the community'. Jabbour stated that he would be willing to vote on the rezoning issue at this time, but that his preference would be to resubmit this application to the Planning Commission so the proper public process may be followed. Flint commented that in his view the issue of rezoning should be looked at jointly with what the developer is proposing rather than separately. Flint stated that the area is zoned two acres and should not be rezoned until a PRD application is submitted that show s a compelling reason to change the zoning in this area. Newman stated that the poor soil conditions and high water table are two reasons behind the proposed higher density. Kelley stated that a PRD does make sense for this particular parcel of property. Newman remarked that they have taken numerous steps to develop a plan that would be suitable for this property’. Newman inquired whether any portion of the application fees on this application would be refundable if they decide to resubmit a new application. Moorse stated that a portion of the fees may be refundable, noting that he is unaw are at this time how much of the application fee has been expended. Mayor Jabbour suggested that a vote on the rezoning be taken, with a new application being submitted that is more in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to deny the portion of Application U2522 dealing with rezoning of the property located at County Road 6 and Willow Drive North based on the recommendation and comments of the Pl.'inning Commission, with the portion of the application dealing with the subdivision being tabled at this time, with resubmittal to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. Weinberger stated that this application is also requesting an amendment to the comprehensive plan Page 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25,1999 Jabbour amended his motion to include denial of the comprehensive plan amendment to guide the land use designation from two acre density to one acre density. Peterson seconded the motion. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. There were no public comments. VOTE ON MOTION; Ayes 5, Nays 0. M6) #2531 ROGER AND ELIZABETH OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - fEWAL VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4367 Flint i^ved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4367, a ResoIuVwn Granting Renewal of Variances to Allow Remodeling and Expansion of the Existir^Residence Located at 815 Partenwood Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#7) #2538 RO^ND TORI JAFFRAY, 540 BARRETT AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION N?k4368 Flint moved, Peterson sanded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4368 a Resolution Granting Vanances to Permit Construction of Dormers on the Second Story of an Existing Residei^ Located at 540 Barrett Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#8) #2541 PAUL PHILLIPS, 2blD SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, FINAL PLAT OF PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRAS THIRD ADDITION - RESOLUTION NO. 4369 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to appr^.^ and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4369, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Phillips^^'oodland Terrace Third Addition. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#9) REQUEST FOR DOCK .ACCESS - DAMD L>^LACE, 220 BIG ISLAND David Lovelace, Applicant, was present. ^ \Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting dock access to his (»^opert>‘ located at 220 Big Island. Back in April, 1999, the City Council granted a lot area vaNgnee for this property to permit the constructior of a seasonal dwelling on the property. As of today ’s\^ate, the City has not received a request for a building permit from the Applicant. The properlji^s 4..> acres in size and is landlocked. This propert\' is one of several lots on Big Island that potentially will request dock rights. Ny Weinberger stated that according to Municipal Code, installing, maintaining, keep^ or using a private dock on any platted public right-of-way, when such a dock has been specificOlK authorized as part of a permit issued by the Council, is allowed Not more than one sa^onal dock Page 7 \ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & 1 Associates Engineers & Architects September 15, 1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Willow View Subdivision File No. 139GEN-2522 Sc^etT’JO Arae*'»<t tnc ts .nr Cppor[vn$r/ irrs c/e* .“*• r: o.ns C::z G 3ore.:rc3 • Joiesn c Ance'b>i ?£ • r* t Scr/^tj PE • Cif*''* ^ Coo* ®E • "^cCe'C G SC^unirnt. P£ • A Bou^dor p£ • Hzztn i?oxe'*tf. P6 P E Turne*' P£ #r*o Susjn M EOer»«r. CPA . Ser s* Consultants Asscc^jee Prrc pjni Howard A Sanford. P£ • Kenn A Gordon. P£ • .?oocrt ^ Pfefferie. Pi. • ff.:-ard u/ Foste'' P£ • David O Losicota. P£ • f?oo<rt C. Russet. Ai A • Mart A Hanson. Pi • V*cra<i r f?aur-nann P£ • Ted < F«eid. P£ • Kenneth P Andersen .»£ • Mart .R Rolfs. Pi. • S*drey P Vfc'.i:ian*son. Pi. l S • Rocert F Kctsmiin • Agnes M Ring • Allan R<ct Senmidt. P£ Cf* its St f'aui. Rocr*ester M/ iirrtr and St Ctoud. VN • Miiwac«ee. Wi wwwocnesrroo :om Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminary grading and utility plan for the proposed 49 lot Willow View subdivision. The site is located west of Willow Drive and south of County Road 6 in the southeast quarter of Section 28. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Sanitary Sewer: The preliminary sanitary sewer design appears acceptable. It should be noted that the proposed temporary bypass lift station along T.H. 12 needs to be in place before sewer service can be provided to the Willow View site. Final plans should include plan and profile views of the proposed sewer, sewer service locations and sanitary sewer details. Sanitary services should be located 3*feet downstream from water services. All sanitary and storm sewer manholes are required to have an exterior sealing sleeve as manufactured by Infi-Shield or an approved equal. Any connections to existing manholes shall be core drilled and a rubber boot installed. 2. Water Main: The proposed water main shown between Lots 12 and 13, Block 3 should be extended westerly and tied into the 12-inch water main installed as part of the new Orono Middle School project. The water main alignment should coincide with the utility easement on the school property located just south of the soccer fields. We also recommend extending the 8-inch water main northerly to the intersection of Willow Drive and County Road 6. This will allow for a futtire connection to the City of Medina’s water system. Final plans should include plan and profile views of the proposed water main, water main details and service locations. All water main shall be poly wrapped. 3. Grading: We recommend that the lowest basement elevations be at least 2-feet higher than the high water level (HWL) of the closest pond. Proposed basement elevations on some lots on Blocks 1,2 and 3 do not provide this 2-feet of freeboard. We would recommend revising the grading plan or basement elevations to allow a minimum of 2-feet of freeboard. It appears that ponds located in Outlet C will flood the property to the south when they reach their HVM-. We recommend revising the proposed grading plan so tha; ponded water is contained to at least 0.5-feet above the HWL. Block 5 appears to have a low, landlocked area behind the homes. This will result in drainage problems and additional storm sewer may be necessary. An erosion control plan should be submitted for review. 4. Siorm Sewer: The draft version of the City’s Surface Water M.tnagcment Plan (SWMP) shows that this si e lies within the Long Lake drainage district. The proposed grading plan shows ponding throughout the sire. It is unclear how all of the ponds are supposed to function. None of the ponds has an outlet shown. The pond in the northwest comer of the site has no inlet or outlet shown. The pipe shown between Lc's 6 and 7, Block 3 outlets to a wetland. All stonn sewer should outlet to a ponding area. All ponds should meet NURP standards. Ponds should have a 10:1 aquatic bench at the pond’s normal water 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St Paul. MN 55113 ■ 651-636*4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 level (NWL). All ponds should have an outlet stnicture and provided a nunimum of 1-foot of skimming to remove floatables and debris. Riprap should be provided at all inlets and outlets. Storm sewer should be reinforced concrete pipe. Final plans should show plan and profile views of the proposed sewer and include storm sewer details. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for our review. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for their review. 5. Streets/Trails: Final plans should provide horizontal and vertical curve information for all streets. City standards do not allow for more than 10 units to be served by a cul-de-sac. City code requires that a public street serving more than 10 units shall have a minimum paved width of 32-feet where 30-feet is currently shown. We recommend that the trail typical section be revised to show 3-inches of bituminous. Street and utility record plans should be provided to the City after project completion. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. The developer will also be responsible for all pertinent City charges including, but not limited to, trunk sewer, trunk water and park dedication fees. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 5?^ c/)njc/jii QiijnP irr VJC/)>Ci) y\j C) \ \. w ?: ZZ f ^ • 7) ; h\ ----/ / / " i i: Ui —■' /• '• ■ ■'; / ■*' I • '/ ' ’rt f •*l . - ; \ V;..; f /: M f'lllSijiiiiiiittiiitt ■ ; ■■ L~r —;//■ t/ y M'ymxiS I XV V o s. osr3o SM I / r-. EaiiEDBniinn •oJ-*to oo 3 ::3<p (0a 03 “t.* 5czoo-H;o »—• T> CO—i •—I •H d o o -7^am o > ;o c:c: cz cr ro 73 VO :xi 03 03 >>> r-r-^ip —» :o 73 73 73 m m m m CO CO CO CO •—«►—«•-H o C3 C3 r:3 rn rn m rn •ak^ -H -H -H -H •—1 »—«►—I •—1 >3>>> r-r-r-r- f>0 cn -- ■> ro 3^ o (1 f 3 ;4j :o :i*:^3 1 »i 1 «i C 'I 1 n t/i I/I / ir V. i I n mm DATE 08/11/T9 BATCH 504 rROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 27-11B-23 32 0002 ‘ 02300 SIXTH AVE N B B R O'ROURKE BARRY t ROBIN O'ROURKE 2300 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 27-118-23 32 0004 01160 WILLOW DR N CLIFFORD ALFRED HILLSTROH CLIFFORD A HILLSTROH 1160 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE HN 55356 REPORT HO. PI435401 PACE 11 38 27-118-23 32 0013 02350 SMADOWOOD DR J F 8 J H CROBE JOHN CROBE 2358 SHADOWOOD DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 27-118-23 32 0021 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC 608 2ND AVE S HPLS HN 55402 38 27-118-23 32 0022 01020 WILLOW DR N JANES A 0 BERNADINE A JANES K BERNADINE COX 1020 N WILLOW DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 COX OCAO 38 27-118-23 33 0084- 00900 WILLOW DR N ^ T F 1 H T WOLF THEODORE F • HVRNA T WOLF 900 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 27-118-23 33 0009 00760 DICKEY LAKE DR ABRAHAH TNOHAS ABRANAH THOHAS 760 DICKY LAKE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 41 0002 0112S WILLOW DR N W L LESKINEN I D H LESKINEN W i 8 0 H LESKINEN 1125 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 41 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED T 8 C CARROLL THOHAS P CARROLL 2600 6TII AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED INO SCHOOL DIST 8278 lORONO) INO SCHOOL DIST 8278 lORONO) ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55366 38 27-118-23 33 0010 00770 DICKEY LAKE DR C D LEUKUHA 8 J H LEUKUHA CHARLES D 8 JILL H LEUKUHA 770 DICKEY LAKE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 41 0003 02450 SIXTH AVE N S 8 H BOULEY STEVEN J BOULEY 2450 COUNTY RD 6 LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0002 02700 SIXTH AVE N JOHN LEIN JOHN H LEIN P 0 BOX 177 LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 43 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 INO SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ADHIN OFFICE- SUPERINTENDENT 685 OLD CAPITAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 27-118-23 33 0011 00960 WILLOW DR N KATHRYN H BODE KATHRYN H BODE 960 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 41 0004 02500 SIXTH AVE N D H 8 W J ERICHSEN DIANE H ERICHSEN 2500 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0003 02600 SIXTH AVE N T P CARROLL 8 C A CARROLL THOHAS P CARROLL 2600 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAK*^ HN 55356 38 28-118-23 43 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED INO SCHOOL DIST NO 278 IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ADMIN OFFICE- SUPERINTENDENT 685 OLD CAPITAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 •• <,♦ i RUN DATE 06/11/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI93590I PACE 12 BATCH 509 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SB 20-118-23 99 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES C/0 REIERSCORD LAW FIRH 9500 99TN ST W EDINA NN 55929 30 33-110-23 11 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED ORONO PLAZA ORONO PLAZA C/0 REIERSCORD LAW OFFICE 9500 99TH ST W HPLS HN 55929 30 39-110-23 22 0009 00755 DICKEY LAKE DR T G ESAU 8 H A ESAU TERRANCE G t HARY A ESAU 755 DICKEY LAKE DR LONG LAKE HN 55350 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 39-110-23 22 0010 00765 DICKEY LAKE DR JANES FENSKE JANES E FENSKE 765 DICKEY LAKE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 509 00022 01. /j'vc(0 J I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOMLEDCE AND BELIEF lal W. * DATEi CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______________ A RESOLUTION DENYING REZONING AND COMPREHENSIVT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH PID 28-118-23 44 0001 - FILE NO. 2522 WHEREAS, Bancor Group, Inc. (hereinafter the "applicant") on August 18,1999. filed an application requesting rezoning, a comprehensive plan zunendment, conditional use permit and subdivision for a propertv ’ located at the southwest comer of County' Road 6 and W illow Drive North with the City for property legally described as: That part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 118, North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of the centerline of County Road No. 6 as recorded in Book 70, page 3844152 in the office oi the Register of Deeds, Real Estate Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and W'HEREAS, The applicant has applied to the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") for a subdivision of property including rezoning the property firom RR-IB. t\vo acre rural residential to R-IA one acre residential; a conditional use permit to permit the property to de\elop as a Planned Residential Development (PRD); and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the property from two acre rural residential to one acre residential; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance \uth Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Piaruung Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999. at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Page 1 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the fmdings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies the requests for rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan amendment on a vote of 5 to 0 based on the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. 4. FINDINGS The applicant had submitted a request for rezoning the property from RR-IB Uvo acre rural residential to R-IA one acre residential. The rezoning of the property requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow the property to be developed at greater than two acre density. The application was part of an request for a 49 lot subdivision and a conditional use permit to permit the property to develop as a Planned Residential Development. The property contains a total of 58.43 acres of land, with 51.89 acres being dr>- buildable. On May 23, 1988 the City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2. Amendment 2 was a result of a land use study along the Highway 12 corridor. The area east of Old Crystal Bay Road, north of Highway 12, south of County Road 6 and west of Willow Drive was guided for uvo acre density single family homes. The Comprehensive Plan states the wetlands and natural vegetation in the area provide an excellent transition between the more intense use planned for the south and single family 2*acre to the north. Utilizing this as a break, the area to the north will remain at the 2*acre rural residential standard Rczoning the property would not provide an alternative housing style or provide for a housing need not being met. This plan appears to provide the types of housing that would be provided under the existing zoning. Page 2 of 4 m CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______________ 7. 8. 9. Property to the north and east is guided and zoned for Uvo acre residential use. A number of concerned citizens from the locality offered comments at the Public Hearing with the Planning Commission on September 20, 1999. Many local and future residents stated they chose to live in Orono and parts of Medina for the two acre zoning and rural character. Many expressed one acre zoning may have a negative impact on the neighborhood and cause additional traffic using Willow Drive North and County Road 6. Rezoning the property will alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property can be put to a reasonable use under the existing zoning. Developing the site as a PRD under the existing RR-IB zoning would allow the property to serve as a transition between the low density 2 acre lots and non- residential uses. The Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999 and recommended denial of the application on a vote of 6 to 0 and noted the following facts: A. The Orono Community Management Plan was amended with Comp Plan Amendment Number 2 indicating the plan for the subject site is to develop at a two acre rural density development and the Planning Commission is not in a position to change the Comprehensive Plan. B. If the City of Orono rezoned property it should be to provide an alternative housing style or provide for a housing need not being met. This plan appears to provide the types of housing that would be provided under the existing zoning. C. The proposed number of lots (49) may be too dense. A plan reducing the amount of developable lots would be more desirable. D. Municipal sewer and water are available to the property. The proposed development of the property would take advantage of the services available. Page 3 of 4 Co® CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______________ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of November, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Nolar>’ Public Page 4 of 4 Decembers, 1999 To: Orono City Council members From: Kathie Johnston, 2335 Shadowood Drive Re: Proposed project by The Bancor Group at Willow Drive & County Road 6 Firstly, I will say I am pleased with the progress made to-date regarding this proposed project. However, I would appreciate your consideration on a few points. Perhaps some items are decided, but I would nevertheless like to register my comments. (I must qualify these comments by saying I am making them based on the preliminary draft information provided at the last Planning Commission meeting.) Proposed neighborhood exit directiy across from Shadowood Drive • This is very close to the busy intersection of Willow Drive and County Road 6, where several accidents have occurred in the past few years as cars bolt to cross 6 on Willow. We often wait to enter or exit our Shadowood Farms development during peak times of the day. Cars are backed up South of 6 past our drive, and when we do get a window of opportunity, we need to watch out for the car that might be bolting from the other side of 6 at the same time. It would be hazardous to add another source of cars directly into this mix. • Our children stand at the end of Shadowood during morning rush hour waiting for the school bus. Additional traffic in, out, and all about the corner worries me. I also fear that there would be pressure to have a single bus stop, where the kids on one side will be expected to cross Willow to the other side to either catch the bus. get dropped off, or both. • Having grand neighborhood entrances on both sides of the road might also give the impression of a large development that has sprawled across the land, not the rural picture Orono usually portrays. • Here's an idea: why not end the proposed road in a cul-de-sac instead of coming out to Willow, and for city access purposes (if required), put in a "fire entrance" instead? If trails are provided through the development so that kids can access the school fields, it might also serve as a trail-head (but I get ahead of myself). Providing such an entrance would also retain the side-orientation of the houses there so that none are backed up to Willow (something some of my neighbors would appreciate). • Other suggestions might be to move that intersection south to exit between the Cox property and their neighbors to the south, or replace it with access via the proposed Kelley Parkway. Lots • It’s hard for laypeople like me to understand the concept of an "average” of 2-acre minimum versus 2-acre minimum. The majority of the lots in the most recent design are noticeably smaller than 2 acres and a few are much larger. Some are only one-half acre. And those lots are clustered together. And they are closest to Willow Drive. If these lot sizes are acceptable to the city's zoning policies, they should at least be on the west edge of the development, with the larger open spaces closest to the existing neighbors. Although the design is probably limited by wetlands on the site, the current plan IS not convincing about their exact locations and dimensions What is being "given back to the community ”? • I believe developers are required under certain policies to make environmental improvements, provide community assets, etc., and I want to make sure this is given careful and deliberate attention. « Although the developer probably has more details on trails by now, I wanted to suggest that children be able to get from the Shadowood and Ringerswood neighborhoods to the school property and playing fields without travelling along County Road 6 • I would like to see existing vegetation being preserved. Again, maybe they also by now have more detail on plantings, landscaping, berms, etc. to make the development aesthetic. Public streets • The Shadowood development, and a great many others in Orono. was denied public streets. A large proportion of Orono residents like us pay to take care of their own streets; plowing, resurfacing, etc. Through our taxes we would also pay lor our neighbors streets - streets that we do not use or benefit from? • Public streets are wider than private streets. If there were to be an exit directly across from Shadowood. it would look odd and unbalanced. It would also create more “hardcover ”, and it’s been mentioned that storm water drainage is already a concern for this property. I thank you for taking my comments into your thoughts as you consider The Bancor Groups proposal. Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 10/1/99 10/29/99 12/28/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 12/13/99 ITEM NO.: 7 Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Paul Weinberger Zoning Title Zoning Administrator Item Description:#2540 Bradley A. Hoyt 2523 Kelly Avenue •Conditional Use Permit Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Site Topography 1990 Survey 1999 Survey Comprehensive Plan pg. 3-20 Comprehensive Plan pg. 4-13 Applicant Letter (10/1/99) Applicant Letter (10/29/99) Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Summary of Request Mr. Hoyt filed an application for an after-the-fact conditional use permit. The application is a result of a request made by the City of Orono to bring the property into conformance. The need for the CUP results from lakeshore land alteration and construction of a retaining wall. Staff indicated to the applicant that the property must be restored if permits are not granted. Consequently the applicant has applied for the necessary permits for the boulder retaining wall. The sur\eys indicate work w ithin 75* of the lakeshore, please refer to Exhibits E (1990) and F (1999). Background Mr. Hoyt had requested a conditional use permit application, at that time an application was delivered to Mr. Hoyt. Mr. Hoyt made a conditional use permit application with the City on October 1, 1999 that was reviewed by Staff and determined to be incomplete. A notice ot incomplete application was sent to Mr. Hoyt on October 8, 1999 requesting some additional intormation, including an updated survey and information regarding the condition of the property prior to construction of a retaining wall. On October 29,1999 an updated survey was delivered to the City which determined the new retaining (boulder) wall was in fact within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. Staffhad indicated to Mr. Hoyt that variances would be required for hardcover within the 75' setback. Mr. Hoyt and his representative Rick Sheridan again stated no information was available regarding grade changes that likely occurred during construction of the boulder retaining walls. The Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit and Code requirements for granting the conditional use permit. They determined for approval of a conditional use permit variances must be applied for, no approval can be granted without variances. Staff had notified the applicant variances are required for hardcover within the 75' lakeshore setback. Based on no application for variances the Planning Commission could not properly make a recommendation on the variances or undue hardship to support the granting of a variance. Therefore they could not conclude that the CUP could be granted because the retaining wall did not conform with City Code. The Planning Commission did offer the applicant an opportunity to revise the conditional use permit application to include variances. The Planning Commission also had requested additional inform :*ion about the property, to include photos and other property information. Mr. Hoyt ’s repre... ntatives stated it is there position to resolve this matter without any delays. The Planning Commission, based on the statements made by Mr. Sheridan to move the application for\vard, did not table the request but chose to recommend denial. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 permits a CUP to build, alter, or repair any seawall, retaining wall, or otherwise change the grade or shore of lakeshore property if the work meets all other requirements of the Code. Mr. Hoyt has stated he did construct a retaining wall in his letter dated October 29. 1999 attached to this report, but also stated he had not regraded within the 15' lakeshore setback. The property surveys indicate regrading has occurred on the property below the retaining wall. Mr. Hoyt has refused to apply for conditional use permits for the regrading on the property. The most recent survey indicates the slope has been regraded creating a Hat .rea on the lakeside of the boulder retaining wall, and the shoreline has been filled to e.xtend into the rip rap approximately 5-10 feet into the lake. The surveys indicate the 929.4' shoreline has been extended into the lake. Attached (Exhibit I) Mr. Rick Sheridan, in his letter dated October 1.1999 has stated "Bradley Hoyt makes this request for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit based upon the request of the City of Orono and its attorneys, Greene & Espel. P.L.L.P". The application is only for retaining walls within 75' of the lakeshore. No other application has been received for anv additional land alteration or variances for hardcover. Based on the surv eys the follow ing is a list of the ordinances which we believe have been violated when grading and retaining wall work was done. Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 19. Land Alteration; Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to perform or have performed the following land alteration activities without a conditional use permit issued by the Council: B.Fill or reclaim any land by depositing such material or by grading of existing land to elevate or alter the existing natural grade. C.Build, alter, or repair any seawall, retaining wall, or otherwise change the grade or shore of lakeshore property. All of the above-referenced land alterations involving filling and grading shall be performed only with "clean fill" as defined in Section 10.02. Granting of such permits is subject to other regulations and prohibitions of the City Code, and other applicable statutes or ordinances of other governmental bodies. Some of the other "Regulations and Prohibitions of the City Code" which govern this matter include. 10.55 Subd. 8. Development Restricted; Prohibition. Except as hereinafter specifically permitted, no filling, grading, dredging, excavation, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures, obstructions, septic systems, well or other construction shall be allowed within the Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation .Area; nor on any lands within 26 feet thereof; nor on any land within 75 feet of the ordinary high water elevation of any lake shoreline, nor on land abutting, adjoining or affecting said area if such activity upon those adjacent areas is incompatible with the policies expressed in this Section and the preservation of those conservation areas in their natural state. 10.56 Subd. 16(L) & 10.22 Subd. 2 Retaining walls constructed constitute hardcover within 75' of lakeshore where no hardcover is allowed, A variance is required. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variances Required 0’-75 ’21,700 s.f 433 s.f. (2 %) none (0%) 433 s.f. (2 %) To permit hardcover for the retaining wall. 75'-250'27,800 s.f 9.630 s.f (34.64%) 6,950 s.f (25%) 9.630 s.f (34.64%) none 250'-500’3,670 s.f.400 s.f. (10.90%) 1101 s.f (30%) 0 none Issue for Discussion The application made by Mr. Hoyt is only for the retaining wall. The recommendation of denial was based on the conclusion that the retaining wall does not comply with all requirements of the Code. No after-the-fact permit has been received for the regrading required for the wall and variances for the hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission has recommended denial of the application for a conditional use permit because variances required have not been applied for. The Planning Commission commented that a hardship may be difficult to demonstrate based on the total hardcover and other unresolved issues. Staff Recommendation Staff Recommends the application for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit be denied or if the applicant requests to table and revise the application; Approval for a conditional use permit per Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 requires the project to meet all other provisions of the Municipal Code. Variances are required to permit hardcover within 75' of the OHWL of 929.4' designated for Lake Minnetonka. 1) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 (Regulations for the Lakeshore Residential Districts), 2) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 (Flood Plain and Wetland Management) and 3) Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) do not permit hardcover within the 75' setback lone. If the applicant wants to proceed with the request they must make an application for variances, and it is Staffs position additional land alteration occurred on the property simultaneously with construction of the retaining walls. Any land alteration would require additional permits. Staff is again requesting the applicant provide the following information and application: 1 . Variance applications for hardcover within the 75' lakeshore setback. 2. Information regarding the propert>' conditions prior to construction of the wall. This information should include plans submitted to the contractor, photos and site survey. 3. Information relating to the contractor and plans the contractor used for the project. All the above information is required for a detailed review of a variance application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: .Motion to direct staff to draft a resolution to be adopted by the City Council at the ne.xt available meeting. GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION October 8,1999 . Bradley A. Hoyt 2523 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 Re: Application #2540 The City of Orono is required to notify you within ten (10) business days as to the status of your application. The following information is required before we can proceed with your request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variances. 1 The survey you have provided to us indicates existing structures and the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, however the survey is required to show previous and existing topography over the entire property. 2. Cut and fill calculations for the amount of fill, in cubic yards, that has been added within the 75' lakeshore setback. This information needs to be submitted by October 29, 1999 to remain on the November 15,1999 Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at (612) 249-4600 should you have any quesuons. Sincerely, Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 [€■:-08-1 11:2b ■rONTItlEtiTHL FPOPEPTi-b 124732700 P.02 O' III «r . December?, 1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Rc: Application of Bradley A. Ho>t Ko. 2540 Dear Mr. Weinberger: This letter concerns the planning application of Bradley A. Hoyt for an after-the-fact conditional use permit and variances for his property located at 2523 Kelly Avenue. As you are aware, the Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of Mr. Hoyt ’s application for an after-the-tact conditional use permit. Tne Planning Commission, on the recommendation of statf and despite the request of Mr. Ho>'t’s representatives, refused to consider Mr. Hoyt ’s application for cenain variances. At the Planning Commission, the record will reflect the following: 1. It was the Cit>’ that identified tlie necessary' after-the-fact permits required upon inquiry from Mr. Ho>1. 2 An application was given to Mr. Ho>l by yourself and marked as to the type of permit required by tlie application. A variance was not indicated as required. ■ 3. A letter dated October 8. 1999. from yourself in response to Mr. Hoyt ’s application identified certain items necessar>' for consideration of the CUP and the variances. This intoimation was either provided in a timely manner or not available. 4. Per your own admission., the public notice for the application included the CUP and variances, and no additional information to what was provided by Mr. Hoyt w ould be necessary to consider any variances as part of the application. hM r \ I 70ti KOO S > I «tl2-4 7V I .. 253 Kan I lake Streft, Wayzati, Mirnesora 55391 LCC-OS-1999 li:27 cot IT 11 lEI IT hL PPOPEPT'f'6124732700 P.03 03 Mr. Paul Weinberger December 7,1999 Page 2 Despite these facts, the Planning Commission refused to consider the variances as part of Mr. Hoyt ’s application. Mr. Hoyt now demands that the City Council consider all necessary permits, including any variances, at the December 13,1999 meeting. c: William Skolnick, Esq. . ...* TOThL P.03 A Application # ^ ^ Date ReceKed /tf / //*? ^ Amount Paid ^ SOO CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ,, A . ^ Site Address V T>pe of ADPlIcation to be Filed ' I tff^ ~6ij-pe oi /\ppucauon lo oe ruea ’ rrr * i — Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3— applicant Name Addres sy^^~2^' A\^. Phone (home). ______ Phone (work ’) />/J City nHorfL______Zip. OWTsXR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Zip. Date Pro I (do) Acquired Oc^ / (J ^ ^(month/year) also own the adjacent parcels of land, FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERNDTS - _____S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____SI75.00 Residential Accessory Use _____S250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____S225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____S200.00 Duple.>t Credit/Bldg ___S300.C0 Commercial/Industrial Use ^ • •• ^ / $250.00 Land Alteration yC. Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more X. Grading; seawall; retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD.TID - see Fee Schedule SI50.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) >4 After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee 'v OTHER APPLICATIONS _____S250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____S300.00 Vacation _____S200.00 Easement Vacation _____S 100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____S350.00 Pvczoning (PUD - refer lo fee schedule) _____S3 50.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____S 100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule **• S' RU»I DATE 00/08/99 nAicii sol rnnp ador OUHER NAME TAXPAYER tIAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 11 0022 02525 KELLY AVE K C IIEINDACII IRE IIEIHBACII K C IIEIHBACH IRE IIEIHBACII 2525 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 IIENNEPIII COUNTY PROPERTY IMFORHATIOM SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 11 0023 02595 KELLY AVE R II POMZETTI IDA PONZETTI ROBERT ll/BARBARA A PONZETTI 259S KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MM 55331 REPORT NO. PX93SA01 PACE 9' 38 20-117-23 11 0029 03333 SHORELINE DR HOT COMPANY SUPER VALU STORES INC CORPORATE TAX DEPT PO BOX 990 MPLS MM 55990 PROP AOOR nUIIER NAME TAXPAYER MAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 11 0032 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED DAVID J DELANEY DAVID J DELANEY 9800 CASAMITA RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0037 02509 KELLY AVE C I C NADLER CHARLES I CANDICE NADLER 2509 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0038 02515 KELLY AVE DAVID R HARDTEN DAVID R HARDTEN 2515 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 12 0039 02523 KELLY AVE DRAOLEY A HOYT CONTINENTAL PROPERTY CRP INC 253 LAKE ST E WAYZATA MM 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0096 02S05 KELLY AVE BRADLEY A HOYT CONTINENTAL PROPERTY CRP INC 253 LAKE ST E WAYZATA MM 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0097 00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED BRADLEY A HOYT BRADLEY A HOYT 253 LAKE ST E WAYZATA MM 55391 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 12 0098 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED CITY OF OBONO CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MM 55323 38 20-117-23 12 0052 02999 KELLY AVE R V DAHL AMS DAHL SYLVIA A BERTACNOLI 2999 KELLY AVE EXCELLSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0053 02501 KELLY AVE TODD JONES TODD JONES 3555 CO RD NO 99 HINNETRISTA MM 55369 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 12 0059 02503 KELLY AVE OTL ONE INC JOHN E KUPFER 2503 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MM 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0055 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED KELLY COVE HMOWNRS ASN/ORONO KELLY COVE HMOWNRS ASN/ORONO 2997 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 38 20-117-23 19 001«» 02565 KELLY AVE E J SCHROEOER ET AL TRUSTEES E J SCHROEOER 2565 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 501 00015 M •/ / •/ J ? *4 • / . . ^, • ••• a LI U, r\L.oro * ouiwui i*4v-/. iT*io I irtby certify that thi* turviy bat Ot«n prtparid m« or undtr my dirtel luptrvltlon end Ibol I am a y lletnttd Land Surveyor under Ibe loat of (be jie of Minnetalo. tFPiN a GRON8Ef\C,INC. trh S. Groilberg Minnetota'Cicenu Na i2755 SCALE «I INCH « 30 FEET DATE 5 APRIL 30.1902,r« r, DATUM :MEAN SEA LEVEL NOTE :NOT ALL TREES ON TRACT HAVE BEEN LOCATED COFFIN a GR0NBER6.INC. ENGINEERS a LAND SURVEYORS LONG LAKE. MINNE5'* ' F pj^CRiPTiCM or PRFMtSeS : D, Reqislcfeo Lord Survey No 14 23. I'rj of TU’es. Hennepin County, Minnesota ?*• \ (965 2)-: ■(9953) <r-fc \ vN ^ ■^\ ^^\\v\' - V------ \ ^ ^ vjrT \ \" ■ ■V'^v Nv^w\ /■ N \ V \ 4a .V'. •y.>\\'N <0.»»'ro*na iron rno»W#*» iti*n0^tr*.« t«islinq iipol el«»otio4i. mecn •.*^vl level dutum denotes Ciilsfirq contoi/ line, mecn sel v;% s>^o«n ere bosed upon on ossunned Cotum Survey intends to s^o<• tne ooundcries of l^« cbove described property, teaven of cn eiistmq ncuse. end the tocnticn of c» vis Be "her dco^er * VI. 11 does not purport to S^Ov• cny oiner in-ipro^e'nents or encroccrmcntS. : Due lo sno** end ict cover, iccct.cn of a ncrdccver #3»/y/e \'\>\\ H 'c '' ^ V»'' \ * p^^yiRONMENT JUNE, 1980 6. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICAL PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. The Harza Study, the 208 Water Quality Management Study, and Orono's Surface Water Management Plan all recommend this approach to permanent water quality management for Lake Minnet..nka. In addition, the Orono Plan goes on to identify individual wetlands and marshlands that require protection as part of the City's storm water management program It is the policy of this plan to effectuate the policies and recommen­ dations of the 1974 Orono Surface Water Management Plan. 7. PROTECTION OF THE CITY'S MARSHLAND, WETLANDS AND DRAINAGEWAYS SHALL INCLUDE PROTECTION OF ADJOINING LANDS AND PREVENTION OF DRAINAGE, FILLING, DREDGING OR WETLAND'S VEGETATION REMOVAL. Ordinances will establish setbacks for all land alteration or c'onstruction. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulationf will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensit. bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachm 9. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonab in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas-of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection wi be encouraged. 10. LAKE BED ALTERATIONS WILL BE DISCOUR.AGED BECAUSE OF ADVERSE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY. Dredging of lake beds release large amounts of otherwise trapped nutrients and silt which adversely affects water quality for long periods of tine. Dredging of new channels or inlets will not be approved to provide riparian access where none existed naturally. Dredging will be permitted in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the ^ control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. CMP 3-20 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 3. DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WILL BE LIMITED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO A LEVEL WHICH WILL NOT OVERLOAD THE NATURAL SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND FILTRATION SYSTEM. Urbanization increases the speed and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. Developed land use densities will be deternined by comparison between known levels of volume and pollution generation and known marshland capacity for ponding and nutrient assimilation. 4. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS LliIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. Wetlands, drainageways and floodplains will be protected from encroachment and from alteration or destruction by filling, grading, excavation or drainage. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage ease­ ments for conservation of these lands. 5. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. • 6. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant _ . impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reason­ able in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear- cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. CMP 4-13 SL :nt. r^ .'f'' - ■'• 'I <- 1 - , V'v'’ CONTINENTAL ?:0 r : :: V C f o u 3 . Inc. ^nv/T-.-v y- ; v;-' --iv :-: Sv ■'^ s' 'A ■ •^ ■ ^fW: r-'-vr • • mm.g^^vX55v;;*-.-. •' • i- ? ^i?r 2''^" i3?'T- -o- October I, 1999 Mike Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator City ofOrono Orono, Minnesota Re; .Application for Conditional Use Permit of Bradley A. Hoyt for Property Located at 2523 Kelly Avenue, City of Orono Dear Mr. Gaffron; On behalf of Bradley A. Ho>l, enclosed and hereby submitted is a General Land Use Application for an After-the Fact Conditional Use Permit for landscaping work performed at 2523 Kelly Avenue. I understand that Mr. Hoyt's application will be submitted to the planning commission at its review meeting at the ne.xt available opportunity. When Mr. Hoyt obtained this application from the City, Mr. Paul Weinberger of your office placed an ne.xt to “S250.00 Land Alteration" and an “.x" next to “Grading and filling designated wetland or Hoodplain". Since Mr. Hoyt performed no land alteration within the wetland or floodplain, we do not believe that Mr. Weinberger’s designation is appropriate. The only appropriate designation, if applicable, would be “Grading, seawall, retaining walls withis 75' of lakeshore", as alleged in the City’s counterclaim against Mr. Hoyl in his lawsuit pending in United States District Court. Case No. 99-CD-1034 (JRT/FLN). Since the only portion of that designation that may be applicable is “retaining wall within 75' of lakeshore" we have appropriately checked and modified this box. V\’e have also checked and hereby submit an “After- the-Fact Fee” in the amount of S500.00 for processing this application. Please be advised that Bradley Hoyt makes this request for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit based upon the request of the City of Orono and its attorney s. Greene &. Espel, P.L.L.P., and by making this application, in no way intends this application to constitute an admission of any liability of the allegations contained in the City of Orono's counterclaim. ^ A 253 East Lake Street, Vayiata, .Minnesota 55391 CONTINENTAL ? f I ? : r * Of o u ? , Inc. W-vci^ .\ '' v-'f. -' ^r^^.' .v" . -.r-; ■' t '5T4%‘ L* •• - -V 1 P^r ^g^.v- fj Y i - ^ ' 12-473^^700 DO-SSt^g October 29,1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning AdministratorA’lanner City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 Re; Request for Further Information on Application No. 2540 Dear Mr. Weinberger: I xvrite in response to your letter of October S, 1999 in which you request the following additional information relating to my application for a conditional use permit on my property located at 2523 Kelly Avenue. 1) The survey you have provided to us indicates existing structures and the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, however the survey is required to show previous and existing topo2raphy over the entire property. 2)Cut and fill calculations for the amount of fill, in cubic yards, that has been added within the 75 lakeshore setback. In response to your first request for a previous and existing topography over the entire properly, I am unable to fully comply your request because I am not in possession of a preexisting topograp c sur\-ey of my propeny. However, I have had prepared an existing topographic survey, a copy of which accompanies this letter. I do not understand your request for a topographic survey of the entire property when only lakshore area is the subject of my application. During the Spring and Summer of 199S, wind and rain storms toppled several tress, which was likely to cause the soil to erode on the hill facing the shoreUne of my property. For this reason, I placed boulders on my property to prevent erosion of the hill. Other than this landscaping, no change to t e topography has taken place. In response to your second request for cut and fill calculations within 75 feet of the lakeshore setback, I reiterate that nothing has been added or removed from the property other than the boulders placed at the edge of the hill. No soils were added in connection with the landscapmg. and the grade is substantially the same as it was before the trees were 253 Ejs: Lake Street, Waj-zata, Minnesota 55391 Mr. Paul Weinberger October 29,1999 Page 2 toppled. I can give you no additional information on this issue other than what has already been provided. If there is any specific information you would like to know other than that which you already observed on the property, please let me know. c: William R. Skolnick, Esq. B rad Mc^YT HARDCOVER C^CULATiOiN VVOKA:)tUb:iii * SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250’ 25-500’ /Vt/. 500-1000’ Z.-Z7- EXTSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House* ______ X Length X X X B. Garase C. 'Driveway ••• X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pacio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plasiic. Or Fabric • C<7/»r. co’Aic fii cojm,x _____________ X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A_ _ _ -i- B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZQNT A. House _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X Len^Lh B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patto/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Of Fabric X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _• + B , ••• • • S.F. wid-a S.F. • S.F.- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. .1 S.F. •S.F. ^3 o S.F. S.F. S.F. • • •- I S.F. S.F. X 100 'i\noo t S.F. t % S.F. width S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A B i • r** _ S.F. S.F.f s:f. S.F. *S.F. S.F. X ICO - is.F. S.F. A B 14 • i. . B rao HARDCOVER CALClJLAnOM WOKKatiKlLi SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 25-500’500-1000' EXTSTINC' HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House LengOi X X X B. .Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk 17.3 X X ••• E. Patio/DeeJe Po ac,t^X X F. Landscape Underlain 113 By Plasilc, _ I 0«T Of Fabric • X X X G. Ocher pOCK Or* ‘^c/*5rie. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN 2QNF. A. House Lenj'Ji X X • X B. Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. 0*.her TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _• B . SQOB WidOi S.F. j/ S.F. _S.F. . S.F. S.F. 2670± S.F. S.F. 5,9 102 S.F. S.F. S’SO* .1 S.F. ’.S.F. bSZ. '2.10 S.F. S.F. S.F. 2id S.F. X ICO B63o * S.F. - A* 27.fi;por ' S.F. .ir 7/. ^4 • %tv. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • • r • S.F. S.F. .s:f._ ‘ S.F. o.F. S.F. X 100 - S.F. S.F. 91 A 5 ■ • • 14 • MoVT . . HARDCOVER CALCULA'nOM WOKKSfiJiK) * SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250’ Q5-S0^500-1000' 2-2V- ^ Cf^/JLC EXTSTTNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House • __ X Lenf^ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk X X X • ••• • * * • E. Pacio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic. ^ Or Fabric * X X X X X X X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A -r B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pstio/Dcck F. Uridscape Uoderlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X -x X X X X X X X X X G, Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property AREA IN ZONE A • — B , Wufdi -S.F. ^o:o • • • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S,F. '•S.F. S.F. S.F. 's.F. • • • • S.F. X ICO 4oj> s.F. ? s.F. • • ••• •A .• B . ' WuJA .S.F. S.F. S.F. ;S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. *S.F. S.F. S.F. X ICO - . S.F. " S.F. r# A B ••• • • •14 • DEC 1 3 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CiiY uruhOi^o DATE; 12/6/99 ,= ^ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2544 Alfred and Marilyn Richie 90S Tonkawa Road Final Plat of Richie Addition — Resolution Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshorc Residential District Exhibits: A B C D E Draft Resolution Resolution No. 4344 Approving Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Minutes (August 16,1999) City Council Minutes (September 13,1999) Planning Report Application: Alfred and Marilyn Richie have made a final plat application for property located at 905 Tonkawa Road. The Richies have completed all requirements and conditions of the preliminary plat for a three lot subdivision of the 6 acre site in the LR-1B (1 acre) zoning district. The preliminary plat was approved with Resolution No. 4344 (Zoning File #2512), attached as Exhibit B. This site was originally platted as three lots but later combined into one tax parcel. The plat will consist of 3 lots with an average density of two acres per dwelling unit in the (LR-IB) one acre zoning district. Bluff Easement The lakeshore side of the property is defined as a bluff by the criteria listed in the Shoreland Ordinance (Section 10.56). An easement document has been granted to the City of Orono to be recorded on the chain of title for Lots 1 through 3 to alert future property owners of the bluff impact zone and restrictions to vegetation removal and land alteration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. 4 / A A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF RICHIE ADDITION FILE NO. 2544 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a three (3) lot residential development by Alfred P. Richie and Marylin A. Richie (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR-IB, 1 Acre Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a single family residence to be fully developed; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4344, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the Class 111 subdivision. 2. Dedication on the plat of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. 3. The City Engineer has approved the grading and erosion control plan for the site. 4. 5. The sewer extension within the right-of-way for Tonkawa Road has been approved by the City Engineer and Director of Public Serv ices. Creation of a bluff easement for the protection of the bluff impact zone, including protective language alerting future property owners of restrictions on vegetation removal and land alteration. Page 1 of 4 6.Payment to the City for the final plat review fee and fee for legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of S400.00. 7.Payment to the City for park dedication fees for the creation of two (2) new lots in the amount of $9,800. 8.Hennepin County has preliminarily approved the driveway access for Lots 1,2 and 3. 9.Subdividers have signed the Developer's Agreement and have submitted a Letter of Credit in the amount of 150% of all required improvements on the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Richie Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1.Prior to City release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements and requirements of Preliminary Plat approval as may be required by the City Attorney. 2.Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolution in a format acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing, and shall complete all conditions to the satisfaction of City staff, prior to release of the plat for filing. 3.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Regiscni^ of Titles Office on or before June 13, 2000 together with a certified original copy of mis resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. Page 2 of 4 , At.rf-v-'at A - ~ ------------— The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 13th day of December, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of December, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 RICHIE ADDITION R.T.DOC.NO.^ •«« «• Cm* mm f%*§ C' \-\0 X \ >' ^mm0* M «i«if V. \ ♦ '/N. 7: M ^ !«>•• ^ •\ »«• 'Q r <•o '.V V.^r» '•> / ^ , < y-A .p. \o \A a. • u \ 'W -\ % \ \\ \' \ 120 180 240 Scale in feet o Denote* iron nrxonument n wm Ji»tf ^a V', >>. ,'C. 'P rArriN v adawoppa ima INOW m ARSONS av TH€SE RRCSCNfS TKM A»ed R RM and ItotfM A Ride. ^ ^ !•• o-«^ o# eia de-cnted proper, Mu.,^ ^ C4K^ ^ 3 Riock I. Vasa RARR,mtm^qipv«a Trip Nor«»*pMpn)r potfvenr knp of pip a6o«p M P) Toppnt C psp No 1054^ rocardtdpipitiprpof Kf «P<U0I I rut Pppp Mprt^^ *!?****^ •• •••^ ®" •• a*«i signed ALFRED P RICNC MARM.VNA RfCMC STATE Of MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF.-------------) ^ *o'*ON»a MMruM »M pdPWplodaM boNfP «p tip ----------------------------------------tyARrpdP RiClhp andMpnf^ A R<lPo. liutfeM«M Uf COtfMMXOn papppi . Coip«|f. lampMip “"***''***”"****^**^*^"*****‘*°^~t-^tt S. * iMM r--,_ • Mpta S GMpf9.UridStp^^MEfttMMr jyMaipigcO sui. or U^HIWT*. —«»*, ~ COUNTY Of HENNEPIN) T>ip lorpgppig ptppwppfp «pt pcAwafppapd Ppl^ M Pm i/i^ RoMOf RiAPc ■ ^/e^pfr___ ORONO MINNESOTA Mrcoppp,mppipnhpp / ■ •PPIP^ppppprPt POP ,pcOP«iprp»pp^S id Pie COPP^PPPPP, p| Nppe-.'ep-a *«P eJTT^L. CITY COUNCE. OF the OTY OF ORONO, IWRIfSOTA * TAXPAYER SERVICeS DEPARTMENT. Mwpppi Coppy. UmoMla ^P»y CP*Wy rpi MfAM p pi--------•^P'WTMrfApapfcpppppMlDflpnddtper^optMplii Omt PATRiCiC N OCONNOR. NENNfPM COUNTY AUOfTOR SURVEY Oti/ISfON HpnnpppiCoippy Mtpmpu « kum sut i« MM MS IIWSI tM SW hM Om* CARY F CASWEtl HENNEPtl COUNTY SURVEYOR WIQSfHAROf nuts HPPrptMlCfMPF Mppipmu I certJr tf-Pi P'P RJCNIf AOOiflON »pt Mpd Mr rpcprp p| fPP ---------------------------------m___________PCMCA___u MiC ha EI H CUNMFF. registrar of TITUS R.T.DOC.NO. >SA ^AMK. •CfiOfOr^ M tw r«ow«»i fl« «• r af ih« ate«« oatoiMioi i hMOaMi l»V AAoai lan«MatM Ml iy«d and fiM M MCHC AOOmCM. Mtf it lM«l I dTMiaM am MMy MMMMtt M «MMI on tw piti aitfM ana M«ayn a R iom. iMaana ana wia. fiava iiafaiaaa aai wm i mmvmamcnc ti5 •* Mf caawMjian aopiva* . Caiaay. tannaiaii rj:r~rsrrr.rstis:sr:s?:^ ' « rr «"■*»» »*^ - •» *• M«aS C*ar«aff. SMT\a^ mH M>nra>0la L«anaa Numaar 127SS lawlM //*^ 4ilL ■naafWaC t«a araaa«aa M aav aanaa Has M ^ aia c% C*a«i a« Ria Car al Om aiMiaMa. at •»> • Mpaeanai •« ilTfanMt>iMMiawaaJ55%-g- ■. tnpinr •#•«. i2r*?rvcouNCAoarMC C ity od (MONO. mtm^oiA nnaarfiCaMRr khnnw , ana anari««r« naval llvM<raniM|W.QM Wi(» M Or(U)NNOR. HCNNCRM COUNTY AUOtTOR laaai (im«i •«« ft« am aaaai' f CASMfU MCNNfRtl COUNTY tUNveYOR RICHN AOOiTiON rnmtmtm, ,^tm4 « t^tAca fM ________aciacii__M NR€i M CUNRITF. Rconnuyi OP mvf 1 OapuRr ¥1 r *4) el •fl CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 dd A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 905 TONTCAWA ROAD FOR ALAN ANT) MARILYN RICHIE FILE NO. 2512 WHEREAS, Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie (hereinafter the "subdividers") on July 21, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three (3) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lots I, 2 and 3, Vasa Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunitv ’ to speak ireon; i WHLRLAS, on September 13, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdi\ ision application, noting the following findings of fact: 1. 4. The property is located within the LR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of one acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The entire site is approximately 6.3 acres. The proposed plat consists of three (3) residential lots each meeting or e.xceeding the one (1) acre minimum requirement for the zoning district. AW lots exceed lot standards for lot width and lot area, and have demonstrated adequate building sites. Page I of 5 o; d\ pIi CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 X d d esoia ) and St 16, ;n the d the omng \ithin ng the ►trated 5. All lots shall have direct access to Tonkawa Road (County Road No. 135). 6. All existing hardcover will be removed by the subdividers upon completion of the final plat. 7. Setbacks for structures is 35' front vard and 10' side vard. 8. The draft version of the City's Comprehensive Stormw ater Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district. The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All flows ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site will make ponding difficult. 9. A vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff is necessary to provide water quality benefits to Lake Minnetonka. 10. Hennepin County shall grant access permits for access to Tonkawa Road. 11. The property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project. Sanitar>' sewer to serve Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be extended southerly appro.ximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the property. 12. A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property'. Structures are required to meet a 30' top of bluff setback. This setback has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3. 13. Any alteration within the bluff impact zone shown on the preliminary plat shall require further Planning Commission and City' Council review'. 14. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on August 16, 1999 and, recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the three lot subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City' of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Page 2 of 5 o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.4 .9 d A 4. 6. 8. Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie, legally described above per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated July 15, 1999, revised September 8, 1999 subject to the following conditions: 1. Subdividers submit a Grading and Erosion control plan for the entire site to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Subdivider shall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for new curb-cut and access to Lots 1,2 and 3. 3. Plans shall be completed for the e.xtension of sanitary sewer service to the property by a registered engineer to the specifications set by the City Engineer and Director of Public Services. Development plans shall be approved by the City prior to final plat approval. Lots 1,2 and 3 shall each have direct private access to Tonkawa Road (County Road 13 3 ^ • No building permits will be issued until the structures and hardcover is removed from Lots 2 and 3 and erosion control measures are in place and approved by the Cit>- Engineer. Sanitary sewer to serv’e Lot 3 e.xists west of the existing home along the south property line. Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer line on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 shall be e.xtended southerly to serve Lot 2. Detailed plans shall be provided to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer and Director of Public Serv ices prior to final plat. Tonkawa Road is a County Road, fmal plans shall be provided to Hennepin County for review. The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the right-of-way. 9. Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements for the property-. 1 0. Pavment of Park Dedication Fee for two (2) new residential lots per City Ordinance. Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _4 4 d 11. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to file a final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. 12. Subdivider is hereby advised any changes with the layout of lots shall require further review by the City Planning Commission and City Council. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include; # A. Lot lines per survey by Coffm & Gronberg, Inc. dated July 15,1999 revised September 8, 1999. B. Designation on the plat of all drainage and utility easements. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required; A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded casements currently affecting the property. C. Signed and executed Developers Agreement and Le^er of Credit for samtary sewer extension and improvements. D. Completed application for private road name. E.Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a map defining said casement: for the property' located within the top of bluff setback. Page 4 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 3 44 3.FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 2 new lots x $4,900 = $9,800. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13 th day of September 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & Cit>- Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. 'Tn K-j Lf ■I Notary Public <•___ Pase 5 of 5 ORONO PLANNING CONEVnSSION MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16.1999 (#2512 Alan Richie, Continued) City Engineer as well as obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for the new curb cut and access to Lots 1.2. and 3. The Applicant is further required to submit plans for extension of the sanitary sewer service for review and approval by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Erotas stated they have the understanding that this property was previously approved for a three lot subdivision before the original residence was constructed. Weinberger stated it was originally subdivided into three lots and then combined Into one lot for tax purposes. There were no public Ci mments. Smith inquired whether the applicants have any concerns regarding the conditions outlined In the Planner's Report. Erotas stated they are In the process of complying with the conditions. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2512, 905 Tonkawa Road, for a three lot lakeshore residential subdivision of a 6.3 acre lot, with the understanding that the Applicants must comply with all the conditions outlined in the August 9,1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. mUED NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#7) #2§TV^NDREW RONNINGEN. 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE, 7:30 p.m. - 7:56 p.m. The Certificate of W6i(jng and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Andrew Ronningen, Applicant^as present. Jenson staled the Applicant is reqo^fing variances to construct a two story, 22* by 24* addition to the existing home. Variances are rlfwired to the average lakeshore setback, as well as hardcover within the 75-250* zone. The Abdicant has proposed to remove 18 patio blocks as part of this project; however. Staff feels that in t^p^s a large amount of landscaping with plastic underlayment that could be removed in order to^thow for the addition and stay under the 25 percent hardcover allowed. Structural coverage limits will n&Ube exceeded with this addition. With the reduction of 320 square feet of landscaping, the hardco^^would be reduced to 24.2 percent. Ronningen stated they would like to construct the addition ont^Higir house to accommodate their growing family. Lindquist stated that the Planning Commission does not count plastic a^iaajcover anymore, but that removal of the plastic will be a condition of approval. Lindquist inquired^Wiether removal of the patio blocks would be sufficient to bring the hardcover under the 25 percent limi!?*^^ Jenson stated removal of the patio blocks would account for approximately 180 square fi^. but would need to remove approximately 320 square feel of hardcover elsewhere in order to o'" hardcover below the 25 percent limit. ii. oui Page 7 QRONO CHY CQUNCIUIVIEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999 D PARK COMMISSION" COMMENTS - Susan Wilson Susan Wilson said the Park Commission has been discussing working with the Crystal Bay residents on an ice rink. She suggested that the Council consider incorgoratuig a piece of City property in the park before fin^ plans are made for the park in Crystal Ba> and she asked whether the road betw’een the park property' and the City property is still needed. Jabbour asked about the progress on the environmental upgrade of the site. Gapga said that everything_is complete except the monitoring, wells must be pulled out. Jabbour said that the Council would look into incorporating the City propertv in the park. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (?f4) #2492 RICK ANT) GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCES AN*D CONDinONAL.USEJBER>nT Barrett reported the applicant’s attorney requested that this matter be tabled Peterson moved, Sanscvere seconded, a motion to table Item #2492,2490 Old Beach Road, based upon the applicant’s request. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#5) #2511 DOUGLAS ANT) CLAUDLA WHTTELY, 60 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4343 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4343, Granting a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10, FUe #2411,60 Orono Orchard Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#6) #2512 DAVTD EROTAS ON BEHALF OF ALAN ANT) MARILYN ^ 905 TONTvAWA ROAD - PRELDHNARY PLAT - RESOLUTION N0.4344 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4344 Granting Prdiminarj Approval of a Class HI Subdivision Located at 905 Tonkawa Road for Alan and Marilyn Richie, File No. 2512. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#7) #2526 PETER ANDREA CO., 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - FINAL PLAT OF JACOBS MULL - RESOLUTION NO. 4345 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4345 .Approving the Plat o Jacobs Mill, File No. 2526. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 4 L. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEE / J » CITVOhOrtt, DATE: 9/8/99 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2512 Alan and Maril>Ti Richie 905 Tonkawa Road Class III Preliminary* Plat Subdivision—Public Hearing Zoning District: Comprehensive Plan: Site Area: Proposal: LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre minimum lot size, Sewered Urban Service/Urban Residential 6,3 Acres 3 Lot Lakeshore Residential Development (Single Family) Exhibits: A B C D E F G Application Plat map Property Owner’s list Reduced Survey City Engineer report Resolution No. 3317 - Vacating Sewer Easement Sanitary Sew’er Map Summary of Request Erotas Building Corporation (applicant) has an interest in property located at 905 Tonkawa Road, owned by Alan and Marilyn Richie. The applicant has requested a three lot subdivision of a 6,3 acre lot. Proposed three lots would be located on North Arm of Lake Minnetonka and have access from Tonkawa Road. As shown on the property sur\ey (Attached E.xhibit D) the lot is developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to the lake. Applicant has indicated all existing structures and hardcover will be removed from the property. It has been several years since the property has been used for residential purposes. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 11.03, Definition 66(C) 2/3 - Subdivision classified as a Class III Subdivision. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) - Lot Standards Required lot area = 1 acre Lot 1 = 1.81 acres Lot 2 = 2.35 acres Lot 3 = 2.14 acres Section 10.02, Definition 43(B) - Lot width for lakeshore lots Required = 140' Lot 1 = 197 Lot 2 = 200’ Lot 3 = 191 ’ Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1 and 2) - Allowed hardcover Lot History A previous applicant had proposed a two lot subdivision with Zoning Application #1818 and received preliminary approval by the City Council. This plan included preserving the existing house and associated hardcover on the lot. Following application for final plat the applicant requested the subdivision be withdrawn. The one year time period for preliminary plat approval has expired. 4 t PARCEL INFORiVUTION Property Identification: The subdivision includes the following parcel; 08-117-23 21 0012 Legal Description: Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 1 , Vasa Park Conformity to Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Standards: Lots within the LR-IB zoning district require a minimum of 1 acre dry buildable area and 140' of width at the lakeshore. The proposed lots are as follows: LOT P^FORMATION The subdivision is proposed as 3 lots on 6.3 acres. Block 1 Dry Acres Total Acres Loti 1.81 acres 1.81 acres Lot 2 2.35 .icte;'2.35 acres Lot 3 2.14 acres 2.14 acres ♦ No designated wetlands are located on the property Each lot exceeds minimum standards for lot width and size, and appears to demonstrate suitable building sites. Surrounding Properties Surrounding properties are zoned LR-IB (one acre residential). The locality is primarily lakeshore lots that front on either Stubbs Bay, Maxwell Bay or North Arm of Lake Minnetonka. The proposed use and development of the three lots would be consistent with the character of the Tonkawa Area. ZONING The parcel is zoned LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is one (1) acre. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Lakeshore Side Yard 1 acre 140'________3£_________75'____________10'______________ Access Access to the three lots would be via private driveways to Tonkawa Road. Driveway permits are required from Hennepin County for additional curb-cuts along County right-ot-way. ITie applicant shall obtain necessary permits prior to final plat approval. Sewer Property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots I and 2 should be provided sanitary service from lonkawa Road. The existing sewer on Tonkav.a Road east of Lot I should be extended southerly approximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the propert>’. Bluff Impact Zone A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property. Structures are required to meet a 30' top of bluff setback. This setbacic has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3. Permanent erosion control measures shall be in place should the paved walk to Lake Minnetonka be removed. If the property owners intend to regrade as a result of hardcover removal they are required to apply to the City for a Conditional Use Permit. Easements Standard ■*in''2e and utility easements along the property lines shall be dedicated on the final plat 10' along the street property line and 5' along interior lot lines. Park Dedication Fee 8% of ihe land value, to be determined by the City Assessor following preliminary approval, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. Drainage The City Engineer has stated in his comments dated August 9, 1999, the draft version of the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district. The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site will make ponding difficult. At a minimum we would recommend creating a vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff to provide some water quality benefits. Final plans should be submitted t) the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Di.strict for their review. Staff has submitted the preliminaiy’ plans to the Watershed District however the District has not completed their review as of the date of this report. Issues for discussion 1. 2. The property is developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to the lake. The applicant has stated his intention to remove all structures and hardcover prior to final plat approval. The City- Engineer has indicated erosion control measures shall be in place immediately following removal of hardcover on the property. All three lots have demonstrated they do meet the zoning district requirements and appear to demonstrate suitable building sites within required setbacks. WMWqiTtmiim I •] •) OVisl Hi rtJiXiRiW rtrtiMr*Kuum-.]rtfliTt f 11 ■ t] M Ft1 M (dTi ■ rt1 MfVt [•K^RUiil ling district, e following •ingmeer. Dortation for ;rvice to the uid Director :oval. tas Building A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELLMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 905 TONKAWA ROAD FOR ALAN AND MARILYN RICHIE FILE NO. 2512 WHEREAS, Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie (hereinafter the "subdividers") on July 21, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three (3) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lots 1,2 and 3, Vasa Park, Hennepin County, Miimesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of C:dinaD.ces, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application, noting the following findings of fact: 1. 4. The property u ' seated \sithin the LR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of one acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The entire site >s approximately 6.3 acres. The proposed plat consists of three (3) residential lots each meeting or exceeding the one (1) acr^ minimum requirement for the zoning district. All lots exceed lot standards for lot vvidth and lot area, and have demonstrated adequate building sites. Page 1 of 5 5. All lots shall have direct access to Tonkawa Road (County Road No. 135). 6. 7. 8. 9. All existing hardcover will be removed by the subdividers upon completion of the final plat. Setbacks for structures is 35' front yard and 10’ side yard. The draft version of the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district. The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All flows ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site will make ponding difficult. A vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff is necessary to provide water quality benefits to Lake Minnetonka. 10. Hennepin County shall grant access permits for access to Tonkawa Road. 11. The property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be e.xtended southerly approximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the property. 12. A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property. Structures are required to meet a 30' top of bluff setback. This setback has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3. 13. Any alteration within the bluff impact zone shown on the preliminary plat shall require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 14. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on August 16, 1999 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the three lot subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Page 2 of 5 n of the Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie, legally described above per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin Gronberg, Inc. dated July 15, 1999, revised September 8,1999 subject to the following conditions: 1. I shows le south th Arm. II make c water project, ce from lould be ction for 3 meet a Lot 3. lat shall 999 and sion. re of the 'f plat for 3. 4. 6. 9. Subdividers submit a Grading and Erosion control plan for the entire site to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Subdivider shall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transoortation for new curb-cut and access to Lots 1,2 and 3. Plans shall be completed for the extension of sanitary sewer service to the property by a registered engineer to the specifications set by the City Engineer and Director of Public Services. Development plans shall be approved by the City prior to final plat approval. Lots 1,2 and 3 shall each have direct private access to Tonkawa Road (County Road No building permits will be issued until the structures and hardcover is removed from Lots 2 and 3 and erosion control measures are in place and approved by the City Engineer. • Sanitary sewer to serve Lot 3 exists west of the existing home along the south property line. Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitaiy service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer line on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 shall be extended southerly to serve Lot 2. Detailed plans shall be provided to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer and Director of Public Services prior to final plat. Tonkawa Road is a County Road, final plans shall be provided to Hennepin County for review. The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the right-of-way. SubdKider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWT) has approved all grading and drainage improvements for the property. 10. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for two (2) new residential lots per City- Ordinance. Page 3 of 5 11. SuWmder is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval ^vill expire one to file Tr *1 preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the bdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. 12. Subdivider is hereby advised any changes with the layout of lots shall require further review by the City Planmng Commission and City Council. FINAL PLAT SUB^^TTALS 1. 2. meetmg L°PtfmbiTg. ■ 999 revised B. Designation on the plat of all drainage and utility easements. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required; A. Tide opinion addressed to the City. Ail owntrs, motteage holders or others B. C. The apphc^t shad provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Signed and e,\ecuted Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit fo sevser extension and improvements.r sanitary E. Completed application for private road name. Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a map defining said easements for the property located within the top of bluff setback. Page 4 of 5 e her 'to 3. FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 2 new lots x $4,900 = $9,800. held dus 13* ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ry STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 1000 1, d- . .??f°'®S°^S^f^«''^'''^ac‘^0'^I«dgedbeforemeonthisl3 1999, by Gabnel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & Cit>- Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarj' Public Page 5 of 5 Application it ? ^^ Date ReceivedT 7/^//^~9 Amount Paid ^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address _____T£>a^!<^A U/a Property Identification Number (PID) g«P-//7 -23 ~ 2./oa ^2. Please check one - Property____abstract or X torrens? Attach legal description to application. l/ATA fiAAK ou/Aje^ Name JLj^Ay i C/<// e rf-AU/ulh^ Address AAifrfjrLoPT A a a a Phone (home) City APF^'c AjH /^AYZAtA MkJr Zip J7iP/Phone (work) if different than applicant) 3Q>34 => <-/GT?/ 6-r. Name Address R'.11LC>W^^ g/OQlO fLft^STy^S Phone (home) City C6 \ (attach list if more than one) Zip5^3/3 Phone (work) ^Tl-^37.^ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District / (T,3 ^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units_l_ Other (specify)_________ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) "X Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _____/ Existing Units 2 New Units 3 Total Units Proposed Gross Density ^ Units per ^.3 Acres Minimum Lot Size VJ, Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use (check) X Residential _________Other (specify) U RUN DATE 07/15/M BATCH 515 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT MO, PI4SMBI PACE 10 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER . ' NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 05-117-23 3<i 0013 ’ 00875 PARTENWOOO LA J P A E K BECHOOL JOHN P A ELIZABETH X BECHDOL 875 PARTENWOOO LA LONG LAKE MN 55358 30 08-117-23 21 0002 ' 00025 TONKAWA RD J E MOORE ALB MOORE JOHN E A LOURDES D MOORE 8551 LAKE HARRIET PKWY E MPLS MN 55800 • 30 00-117-23 21 0010 00025 PARTENWOOO RD jam SAFAR JACK A MARY SAFAR 025 PARTENWOOD ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55358 ‘ 30 00-117-23 21 0013 00035 TONKAWA RD WILLIAM J MCLELLAN ETAL WILLIAM J MCLELLAN 035 TONKAWA ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55358 TOTAL DATCIi SIS 00012 38 08-117-23 12 0008 00000 PARTENWOOD RD BRUCE A NARY ENGELSNA BRUCE A NARY ENGELSNA 000 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55358 38 08-117-23 21 0001 00001 TONKAWA RD E A DANZIGER A J L DANZIGER ERIC A A JENNIFER L DANZIGER 001 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MM .55358 38 08-117-23 21 0003 00087 TONKAWA RD ‘ J P SPOONER A K D SPOONER J P SPOONER A K B SPOONER 1385 ORONO LA WAYZATA MM 55391 30 08-117-23 21 0007 00930 PARTENWOOD RD MALAND C A JO ELLE L HORR MALAND A JO ELLEN HURR 930 PARTENWOOD ROAD LONG LAKE MM 55358 38 08-117-23 21 0011 00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED J W SAFAR A M SAFAR JACK SAFAR 925 PARTENWOOD RD '.ONG LAKE MN 55358 38 08-117-23 21 0012 00905 TONKAWA RD A P RICHIE A M A RICHIE A P RICHIE AHA RICHIE 850 HIGHCROFT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 30 08-117-23 21 0018 00955 TONKAWA RD jam GILBERT JAMES H A MARY M GILBERT 955 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55358 30 08-117-23 21 0017 00980 PARTENWOOD RD CARY W A JEANNE H KRIMHEL CARY W A JEANNE M KRlItttEL 980 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55358 p • * ••?:.. • : I o « ; 'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALAN AND MARILYN mCHIE OF LOTS 1. 2. & 3. BLOCK 1. VASA PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA s s / .. S -. 'I'# ^ ______- - ^ OU1LOINC <5, ' SETBACKv.V- _ WES __ \V !<■ ‘1^ - X y / 1 ^ f * ^ t.JtiM. / / /■ ^ / / / / ^ ^ './ \ V I /\ ^ I I » .'uV-. / ///'/ //V' A'>'wA\» \w* I -i^'i''^-j^] [ \ \ 'A. \\‘vL'ft \ V\V'A</A''vY> ^5«V '■'' •■■' \\ \►<\ \\ , SURVEY \ 'Wx \\‘-\x-" line\ \ T V. / r & 'A.j/• \ \ A 0> «*-\ ^v •too S \" % ,\V s\^ \ o, . ■“ A\\\ V n\V "'1 ^ • _ \ \ EXISTING HOUSE x' |(» K MUOMP) \ 7.»4*' lC f!!//7/\V'fJir \ \ s‘j#; \ \ ^ \ \->'v:^ I f / /A r ^ ✓'■ ^'r > V” — ^ V^\ \W^ r>r5^-^\N\ ^— ~~~ 7 \ \ \\ A / •WS^'CXISTINC ICCAL OCSCHPTION : Lois 1, 2, and J, Block I, Vosa Pork k# rsM L m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Bonestroo. ffosene. Ance* < inrS Assscfates. trc it an Affirr.njtsve Acf.cn/i^uat Opportuntty Efrp:c/er Pnropatr Otto G. Bor PE. • Joseph C AncJcrtik. PE. • Marvm L Sor/afj. PE. • Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Ro5«%* C Scr^ur.crt. PE • Jerry A, Bcurior P£. • Rooert W. Rosene. P.E.. R.c*jrd E. Turrer. P.£ and Susan M. Eten*n. C.P.A.. Seruor ConiuUaris Associate Principals: Hazard A. Sanford. PE • Kenn A. Gordon. PE • Rceert R. Pfcfferle. PE • Richard W. Foster. PE. • Ca#*d O Loskora. PX • Robert C. Ruisek. A.I A. • Marlr A. Hanson. PE • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted IC Field. PE. • Kervieth P Andefon. P*’. * Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P. Williamson. P.E.. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ru'g • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices: St Paul. Rocheste*. Willmar and St Cloud. MN • M.hiArackee. W'l WePsite: wwwbonestroo comEngineers & Architects August 9,1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Richie 3-Lot Subdivision BRA File No. 139-2512 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminaiy plat for the proposed three-lot subdivision for Alan and Marilyn Richie. The site is located on the west side of Hennepin County Road No. 135 (Tonkawa Road) just north of the Partenwood Road intersection in the northwest quarter of Section 8. We have the foUowing comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: Proposed access locations for Lots 1 and 2 should be shown on the plans and submitted to Hennepin County for their review. 2 Grading; A grading and erosion control plan for Lhe entire site should be submitted for review. Removing the existing bituminous/concrete walkway to the lake on Lot 3 will create an erosion concern. This area should be restored immediately after the hardcover removal with fiber blanket and bale checks or equivalent. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading or structure removal. 3 Drainage: The draft version of the City’s Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within die Stubbs Bay drainage district The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All flows uldmately reach Ncrh Arm. The bluff area along the lake and die exiting topoerraphy of the site will make ponding difficult At a minimum we would recommend creaang a vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff to provide some water qualify benefits. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review. 4 Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer to serve Lot 3 exists i^;st of the existing home along the south property line. Lots I and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The exisung sanitary on Tonkawa Road east of Lot I should be extended southerly approximately 100 feet to serve Lot 2. It is unclear why there is an existing sanitary sewer easement shown across all of Lot I and part of Lot 2. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all intcnor lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -way. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we can prepare an estimate of the to^ cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required if the City so desires. Please contact me a‘ • i51) 604-4363 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. ___ BONESTROO '^OSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, CsC. /^irl Tom Kellogg 'Me Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono £ 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651*636-4600 ■ Fax: 651*636*1311 CITY of ORONO f RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.8S I'i A RESOLUTION VACATING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN THE PLAT OF VASA PARK, SECTION 08, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1S49 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and >VHEREAS, on July 21, 1993 the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, Jr. filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a sanitary sewer easement originally dedicated in the plat of Vasa Park, legally described as follows: The sanitary sewer easement shown on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, VASA PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof. r WTIEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on August 16, 1993, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The City has not and does not intend to develop a municipal sewer line within the 20’ easement. The location of the easement within the proposed building envelope of the undeveloped lot will present problems with the future residential development of the site and force development closer to lake. 3. The sanitary sewer easement as it exists serves no public purpose. Page 1 0*' 2 r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.SS NOW, THEREFORE, BE FT RESOLVED, that the petition of the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, Jr. is hereby granted and that the sewer easement legally described above is hereby vacated. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on August 23, 1993. T: •orothy M. I^lin, City Clerk ward J. Caiman, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of August, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Nota^ Public , S. VEE notary pueuc - Minnesota HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission ttiplrss t-12-96 Page 2 of 2 e Lo C cci'' crvx ■ fCERTlFICATE OF SURVEY AND ‘ PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALAN AND MARILYN 'RrCHE OF LOTS 1, 2, ic 3, BLOCK 1, VASA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA sF *<a / 45* MJDiC. UTtACK & %•A X ‘V - 1/ A.r NN ✓ ■^P>r i / / / / « / t i> Dll ' i' F^W vs I I I \ t I \ * \ \' ' ' \ \ } / / 'y. y -ft f \ !\\ ,S ;• v;*"" ^ .SURVEY X' .X \V »<iEXST7<0 HOUSED A'>y<k" \ r M ' / \ .Vx I N ~v m-. ^,vV/r/^ 'N ■X Xjy rr3"WC ■.«*«) t,l, 1. 1 X •«• '. V-» F«r» • • • tsnstn •»• 0 ; #vn*tcs Jk^Ci^ __________ #€*«tta W*i*^ €•<*«•# Ir^ 'ar»* olf 9^0^ »• ►«••< •* - . - UM - ----------»f ir«TNi •»#••? riW* <• l»* ^ INI 1 •» MC,I, U-.^ • <•* . «r tf-IM ^ tTMlI^ 0O€» W»® n 40 TaMaWOC AVOU. IDC Wrt. IH llSi it2-*r>-4Ai I ■mt* OKFvrv Sjo"lo^^ 7-t*>ff rni meeting Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 11/1/99 11/1/99 12/31/99 DEC 1 3 1999 Cl 11 ur UhONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; 12/6/99 ITEM NO, Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout 120 Brown Road South Class III Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Variances Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District Proposal: Seven lot Planned Residential Development on property located at 120 Brown Road South. The proposal will also require variances and a conditional use permit for land alteration, filling in a wetland and road width standards. The DNR is reviewing the propo.sal for permits to allow filling and crossing a protected tributary (Long Lake Creek) and crossing the Luce Line Trail for sewer extension to the south (Fox Ridge). Planning Commission recommended by a vote of 7 to 0 to deny the request for subdivision, conditional use permit and variances based on a request by the applicant to move this item forward to the City Council. The Planning Commission was prepared to table this application to allow additional time for the applicant to revise the Planned Residential Development (PRD) and implement changes to the proposed lot layout based on recommendations by the Commission. Mr. Van Eeckhout then requested the Planning Commission take action on this item to allow the City Council to review the proposed lot layout and conditional use permit for a PRD. Concerns by the Plamiing Commission included the size of the four lots located in the northeast portion of the proposed plat and no dedication of conservation space. A PRD would normally require preservation of natural open spaces. This concept does not have any conservation outlots proposed. It would not be desirable to accept areas designated as wetlands as conservation areas since they would be considered protected areas by the granting of conservation and flowage easements with a standard plat. Please review the draft Planning Commission minutes attached as Exhibit M. Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J K L M Application Plat Map Section Map Site Survey Engineer Comments Property Owners List Wetland Map Shoreland District Boundary Map MUSA Map Planning Commission Minutes (May 17,1999) City Council Minutes (July 26, 1999) CMP 4-12 through 4-22 Land Use Policies Draft Planning Commission Minutes Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.28 - RR-IB Zoning District Standards 2. Section 10.32 - Planned Residential Development Summary of Request: The Preliminary Plat application for a seven lot residential development for property located at 120 Brown Road South requires the following approvals: 1.A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development — This would allow the property to develop at a two acre density using cluster development and preservation space. 2.Road width variance and a variance to allow the road to be developed at less than the minimum requirements. Tract G is platted 40' in width where the City requires a minimum platted width for a private residential road to be 50'. Although the plat indicates a 28' paved width the applicant has proposed a 24' width road. The Subdivision Code requires a minimum paved width for property serving 7 or more sites to develop the road at a 28' width. 3.The subdivision will require a road crossing of a City Protected Welland and locating a NURP pond within 26' of the City protected wetland. The City Council and the MCWD shall approve any wetland alteration on site. 4.The property is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA). A MUSA amendment shall be approved by the City Council and the Met Council to provide sewer to the site. 5.The DNR has expressed concerns with the proposed sewer extension to the south end of the project, with the intent of the developer and City to extend sewer under the Luce Line Trail. Mr. Van Ecckhout would install sewer to the south boundary to provide ser\ ice for the Fox Ridge Sewer Project area. 7. 8. The DNR has stated it is opposed to the line under the trail. Long term maintenance appears to be the main issue. Staff has met with representatives from the DNR and have determined the DNR would issue a permit for extending the sewer along Brown Road to the south. They have indicated this is the preferred location for a sewer line to cross the Luce Line Trail. A small portion of the Tract G is platted to the center of Brown Road. Hennepin County has indicated it would require the west 33' be dedicated to the County for right-of-way. Tract G is owned by Mr. John Dunn. Mr. Dunn is not a co-applicant. He would be required to sign the plat documents and dedicate easements over the lot in favor of the City of Orono. The easements would be necessary for public utility and drainage purposes. The standard road easement would be required should it become necessar)' for the City to acquire the road and open it as a public road. A Homeowner's Association shall be created for the maintenance of the private road and drainage structures within the development. The owner of the 130 Brown Road property, southwest of the development and south of Tmct G, has access from the private driveway within Tract G and shall become part owner of a private road. Sketch Plan The City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed the proposal as part of the Sketch Plan review process. Please note the attached Minutes (Exhibits J and K). The City Council recommended to the property owner the City of Orono lias no intent to rezone the property from the two acre standard. The Council has indicated they would consider developing the site as a PRD and make a provision for sewer service. Conformity to Zoning District Standards and Comprehensive Plan The RR-1B zoning district allows a property to develop as a PRD as a conditional use. Under the PRD the City can establish setbacks for each of the lots. The dr>' buildable areas of loi.s 1,2,3 and 4 are limited and arc between 1/2 acre to 1 acre dry buildable. The lots also are similar to the lots located north of the development in the City of Long Lake. The proposed setbacks shown on the site plan indicate a 35' front yard setback, 10 ’ side yard setback and a 30 ’ rear setback. The established setbacks are similar to other lots in Orono that are zoned 1/2 acre to 1 acre in size. Lots 5,6 and 7 are located south of the proposed private road and be subject to setback standards for the RR-1 B zoning district. They would be developed with an average size close to two acres. They would be a transition betw een the higher density to the north and the RR-IB two acre south of the Luce Line Trail. All lots appear to provide suitable building sites based on sewer service being available to the property. Lot 7 is very wide and has ver> little lot depth. The property is bounded to the north by Long Lake Creek and the South by the Luce Line Trail. 1 he rear yard setback is along the Trail. 1 he front yard setback is 50', but Long Lake Creek is defined as a tributary stream and is within the shoreland protection area. A 75' setback for structure and hardcover is required the same as they apply to lakeshore areas. More detailed grading plans are required. The surveyor shall indicate on the plan set the OHWL of the Creek and 75' structure setback. Access The City Engineer has commented (Exhibit E) the proposed access to the property be platted as part of the subdivision and not by easement. Further, he recommends that the access to the site should meet a minimum 50' width to meet City roadway standards tor a public or private street. The grades are a concern regtirding driveway access to several lots on the property. It appears that existing grades exceed 40% on Lots 2, 3 and 7. Driveway design on these Lots will be critical as the City recommends that driveway grades not exceed 10%. Access to Lot 7 across Outlot B will require the construction of a bridge or culverts at the stream crossing. The plans should provide a design for this crossing. Outlot B would be a shared driveway in favor of Lots 6 and 7. The drive would be required to cross Long Lake Creek which is a protected tributary stream and subject to Orono ’s Shoreland Management regulations. A variance would be required to allow a driveway to cross the creek. Driveway locations and proposed grading shall be shown on the survey. Drainage and Ponding The draft version of the City's Comprehensive Stormw'ater Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Tanager Lake drainage district. The ponding location is shown on the preliminary survey. Final grading plans should include final pond grading including a 10:1 aquatic bench 10-feet wide at the pond normal water level. The outlet structures shall be provided on the final plans indicating the location and actual size of the pond. The City Engineer will require Best Management Practices in all areas where stormwater can not be treated by the NURP pond. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided for review by the City Engineer prior to further review. Sanitary* Sewer A MUSA amendment is required to allow sanitary sewer service to the property. Sewer service has been discussed and a feasibility report has been completed for the Fox Ridge neighborhood south of the Luce Line Trail. The report identified a pressure sewer system as the most feasible to serv e the neighborhood. The pressure sewer would be routed up South Brown Road to an existing gravity sewer on Watertown Road. This system would have the potential to serve properties north of Fox Ridge ;md south of Watertow n Road needing sanitary sewer. The Van Eeckhout plans include a preliminary design for sanitary sewer to serve the site. The plans show a gravity sewer system that ties into an existing sanitary manhole at the south end of Apple Glen Road in Long Lake. This proposed system could potentially serv e the Fox Ridge neighborhood if the DNR issued permits for to cross the Luce Line Trail. The proposed alignment as shown would not provide sewer service to properties along South Brown Road. The topography would allow a gravity sewer to be extended westerly in the proposed roadway to South Brown Road to provide future sanitary serv ice. In discussions with the DNR on December 6, 1999 it is clear the DNR would issue a permit for the sewer crossing along Brown Road not as proposed in this plan. The purpose of extending sewer service from Long Lake through the Van Eeckhout property is to prov ide sewer to the Fox Ridge neighborhood. It is unlikely the DNR will issue pemiits for crossing the Luce Line Trail as proposed because a better alternative is available to cross under the trail below the Brown Road bridge. To extend the sewer south of the Luce Line Trail to the Fox Ridge neighborhood, as proposed on the plan, it would be necessary to obtain a utility easement across a property owned by Longridge Associates. It is not known if obtaining the easement would even be possible. Surrounding Properties The property abuts the City of Long Lake to the north, where properties are provided with sewer and the minimum zoning lot size is 10,000 s.f. (approx 1/4 acre). The property abuts the Luce Line trail on the south, and on the east and west abuts neighboring rural residential properties in Orono zoned RR-IB. Just to the south of the Luce Line is the Fox Ridge neighborhood containing 7 lots averaging 1 acre in area, developed in the 1960's. Easements 1. 2. Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final plat. Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across the wetlands and ponding areas located within the development. Language in the easement documents shall restrict land alteration and removal of vegetation in all wetland areas and within 75' of Long Lake Creek. 3.The DNR has made efforts to maintain a wooded and natural corridor along the Luce Line Trail. They have requested the applicant dedicate a 50' conservation easement over the southern portion of lot 7. Park Dedication Fee 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. The City of Orono has established a minimum park dedication fee per lot of $2,900 and a ma.ximum of $4,900 per lot. Issues for discussion 1. 2. Access to the properly is via a Tract G which is not owned by Mr. Van Eeckhout. Staff is recommending the owner of Tract G become a joint applicant and the corridor be replatted as part of the subdivision. The City Engineer and Director of Public Services have recommended the entire access corridor be platted 50' in width to provide space for future utilities along the private road. The Tract should be in ownership of the Homeowner's Association as they will be responsible for the maintenance. Several lots would be served by driv eways with severe slopes exceeding the recommended slope by at least 30%. 3.Long Lake Creek is a protected tributary and requires a 75' setback for hardcover and structure. The driveway to serve Lot 7 would be required to bridge the creek. A variance would be required for the alteration, however the building pad of the lot is restricted by the lot requiring a 75' OHWL setback. 4.The private road would require the City approve land alteration and mitigation of the City protected wetland. 5.Is the proposed lot layout acceptable with 4 smaller lots to the north and 3 larger lots to the south? Does the plan meet the intent of the PRD for creation of open space areas. Staff Recommendation Conformity to Surrounding Properties and PRD Standards The intent of the PRD Ordinance is to preserve natural open spaces. The subdivision has not made a provision for any space to oe held as conservation/open space. Conservation and Flowage Easements will be granted in favor of the City of Orono for those areas determined to be within protected wetlands. Under subdivision requirements in a standard plat (not a PRD) the City would also require the same C & F easements for wetland protection. This plan has not dedicated land that would be considered preservation land or "open space". The land located south of the Long Lake Creek has potential to eliminate a few concerns if the lot would be used for conservation purposes. The DNR has requested in a letter dated November 10, 1999 an easement of up to 50' wide along the entire southern border with the Luce Line Trail to benefit the adjacent land owners and trail users by providing a buffer zone of vegetation. A 50' easement would restrict vegetation removal and land alteration. If an easement is requested with the PRD it would not remove the ability to develop the lot. The lot also requires regrading and filling of a portion of the Long Lake Creek for driveway purposes. If the lot does not develop a grading and hardcover would not be required to ser\ e Lot 7. Staff feels a conservation outlol over Lot 7 would be desirable to meet the intent of the PRD standards. The Planning Commission recommended Lots 1 through 4 be realigned to have a minimum size of one acre. It appears the applicant has located the lot lines as shown on the survey to preserve the most ideal building sites. The lots located immediately north of the development are zoned for 10,000 s.f (approx 1/4 acre) minimum lot size. The properties, as shown, have a greater lot size than those to the north in the City of Long Lake. Other Concerns A.The property owner of Tract G to be a co-applicant and agree to allow ing the property to be replatted if he w ill remain the owner subsequent to plat approval. B.More detailed engineering data is required to ensure lots will be provided with safe driveway access. The City recommends driveways not exceed a 10% slope. The applicant shall provide to Staff for engineering review a proposed grading plan for the entire site. C. Stormwater calculations should be submitted for review to ensure the site can treat all runoff. Stormwater will flow directly to the Long Lake Creek which flows south directly to Tanager Lake of Lake Minnetonka. D. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for the entire site shall be submitted for additional review. E. Road width for access to the property shall require a variance. The Code requires 28 feet of width. The applicant has proposed a road 24 feet wide. He has requested a variance from the Subdivision Code requirements. The Council should provide some direction to the applicant regarding the road width variances for Tract G and the conditional use permit for a 1RD. Tabling the application to allow additional review by the Planning Commission would require the application deadline to be extended an additional 60 days or the applicant submit a letter requesting the application deadline to be waived. Application for Final Plat The applicant shall be advised the following information is requested to complete the review prior to a final plat application. 1.Detailed Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control plans shall be submitted for review as requested by the City Engineer. 2. Final plans for sewer and water extension shall be approved by Staff prior to review. 3. The Met Council shall approve a MUSA expansion to the site. 4.A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for review and approval by Staff All ponds shall meet NURP standards. 5.A permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required for site land alteration and wetland mitigation. 6.All easement documents for utilities, drainage and conservation land shall be approved by the City Attorney. 7. 8. Final plans for the construction of the roads shall be submitted for review. DNR permits shall be issued for crossing the Long Lake Creek for access to Lot 7 (if required). 9. MCWD permit for gradin.':;, drainage and erosion control plan. 10. Any additional infomtation requested by the Staff, Planning Commission and Council to be documented in the Preliminary Plav Resolution. r’lxv r»ir npONO ZONING FILE #2550 WiTillfIfi ^•riTiTikl ^vnirti ^irt] P.lWi PimDUtBt] PViTiHicilr/thUi^^N roi(t raPlIGW WliTi « I PlfiVil LWilS E. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for the entire site shall be submitted for additional review. F.The DNR, MCWD and any other agencies with jurisdiction must approve grading plans and a crossing of the Long Lake Creek, which is a protected waterway. City Council Review Because the applicant requested the Planning Commission take action on this application it will be before the Council at a future date. The applicant shall be advised the Council may defer any direction to the applicant until the Planning Commission has had the opportunity to fully review the preliminary plat. A Application U _______ Date Received ffewvf Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address ________j Z^O pjo/i.O Property Identification Number (PID)__________________ Please check one - Property____abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Citv ta liu:Zipt?'> ?sL Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address Phone (home) Citv Zip Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels S Development Size N Acres Dry Land _G ____ zo Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present use (check)Residential: no. of units » Other fspecifv)r Present Zoning District PROPOSAL *7 Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites » Existing Units \ ; • * • /..• • « C New Units L- 7 Total Units r 1-. Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size 3 Units per 1 Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land m-n Proposed Use (check)Residential Other (specify)i i ■i .y sic\ m f. ///LOHC LAXZ-72 c i i / I 1: ^ 'nil c:*f. rr.^rr. #4 it**i • • iro OM* SUMS I Lilllili I I • (j - 8^ - it i »!■:TT^i/^/.cy ••••••••••••••A**** u4i •iir»ict «!#•*•* loca Bis«it»Bts'tur Rti«Mr I I KN4»tii CWiTf. MWtSaVA 9mm o >na ic u»na |f»ur^f <r M9f«tv tA« »« ^IC «04ts |#«Cf OlfISICN I •• • • ft.. {©==- z i •rn Rn MO-.14R - • * H 00*0tf 06^ t ___ V - • k/yA------------- • • •\;bJKUVVN \Njiy^Vc 10.) • M •••••*•• II II s 1' r tl. Noowoo-r •‘• y)a50‘*‘’ outK)t 0 -B'^\ irlyr-vr.. ." *• .1' -•! ^_ Vv-‘r / i /-C:^___T ' “<* • .......r .• ■ 'ASSJ w . kh. ' ' . ;/ ' / . ' fr m , ' ' - '^<o*Sk:r- ■', r-- - T_' ------t-V. 0f^f \ m 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene mnB Anderlik & I Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Bosene. Arct.' •< .mj Assoc ^tes. inc is Affirm^itive Ac:>on Bautif Opportunity Bn'pio, >r Princpills Otto G 9or'es!'co PE • Joteph C Anderitk. PE • V*»rvin L SorP£. • Glenn f?. Cook. P£ • Izze'i G Schunicnt. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • Rooeri W Posene. Pc . f?i:n^rd E Turner. PE jnd Susan M EOcrhn. C PA . Senior Consultants Associate Principals Hc.vard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon PE • PoOerr R Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. ?E • Oa/id O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russek. A l A • Vark A Harion. PE • Michael T Raut-T^ann. PE • Ted K Fie ’d. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Si Jney P Wii' amson. ?£ . L S • RoOert F Koismii.h • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE Offices St Paul. Rochester. Wiiimar and St Ooud. MN • Milwaukee. Wi U'fpsite Aw.vorrestrco com November 9, 1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner Ciiy of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re:Van Eeckout Subdivision File No. 139-2550 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed seven lot Van Ecckout subdivision. The site is located east of South Brown Road, south of Long Lake and north of the Luce Line trail in the northeast quarter of Section 3. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1.Access/Slreets: The proposed access to the site is across a parcel marked easement area. The parcel is 40-feet wide. The ownership of this easement area is unclear. We recommend that the access to the property be platted as part of the subdivision and not across an easement. The access should be a minimum of 50-feet in width to meet City standards for a public or private street. The proposed typical street sections do meet the City standards for a private street serving seven or more units. The typical street section for station 0+00 to 4+00 shows an urban curb and gutter section while station 4+00 to the end shows a rural section with ditches. A method of conveying storm water from the urban to rural section should be shown on the plans. This may require flumes, swales, ditching or storm sewer construction. The driveway serving the existing house will need to be relocated so that it doesn’t encroach onto Lot 6. Proposed driveway locations to all Lots should be shown on the plans. It appears that existing grades exceed 40% on Lots 2,3 and 7. Driveway design on these Lots will be critical as we recommend that driveway grades not e.xceed 10%. Access to Let 7 across Outlot B will require the construction of a bridge or culverts at the stream crossing. The plans should provide a design for this crossing. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particularly along the wetland. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City’s* Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within the Tanagcr Lake drainage disuict. A general location for a NURP pond has been identified on the plan^. The final plans should include final pond grading including a 10:1 aquatic bench 10-feet wide at the pond normal water level (NWL). The pond design should also include an outlet structure that provides 1-foot of skimming to remove floatablcs and debris. Best Management Practices (BMP’s) should be implemented on all areas where storm water cannot be routed directly to the pond. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided with the final plan set. 4. Sanitary Sewer: The City ordered and received a feasibility report for sanitary sewer to serve the Fo.x Ridge neighborhood located just south of the Van Ecckout property. The report identified a pressure sewer system as the most feasible to serve the neighborhood. The pressure sewer would be routed up South Brown Road to an existing gravity sewer on Watertown Road. This system would have the potential to serve properties north ot Fox Ridge and south of Watertown Road needing sanitary sewer. The Van Ecckout plans include a preliminary design for sanitary sewer to sene the site. The plans show a gravity sewer system that ties into an existing sanitary manhole at the south end of Apple Glen in Long Lake. This proposed system could potentially serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood if permission were obtained to cross the Luce Line and the parcel directly south of the Luce Line. The proposed alignment as shown would not provide sewer service to properties along South Brown Road. The topography would allow the gravity sewer to be extended westerly in the proposed roadway to South Brown Road to provide future sanitary service. The City of Long Lake should be consulted regarding proposed connections to their sanitary sewer 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 e •r E system. The developer should provide detailed sanitary sewer design including plan and profile sheets. The City of Orono should review the sanitary sewer needs along South Brown Road and determine whether a westerly extension of the sewer to South Brown Road makes sense. We can provide a cost estimate to extend the proposed sewer southerly to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood with gravity sewer if the City so desires. 5. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for C.R. 146. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of- ways. Drainage easements should be provided across all wetland, drainage way and pond areas. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono j r. RUN DATE 09/08/99 BATCH 507 fROf AOM OWNER NAME TAXfAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER HAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Sa OS-117-25 11 0001 •003S ADDRESS UNASSIGNFD CARGILL HAC HILLAN JR ETAL LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES P 0 BOX 9500 DEPT 26 HPLS HN 55990 36 03-117-23 12 0003 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF HINN STATE OF HINN IDNRI CLUCE LINE TRAIL I 36 03-117-23 12 0006 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE HH 55356 36 03-117-23 12 0009 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD PO BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 13 0001 00350 BROWN RD S W F FARLEY I K 6 FARLEY WILLIAH 1 KATHLEEN FARLEY 350 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0007 01695 FOX RIDGE RD T J DAYTON i H DAYTON TOBIN J I HAE DAYTON 1695 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 11 0002 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF HimESOTA STATE OF HINN CDNR) CLUCE LINE TRAIL) 36 03-117-23 12 0009 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S DROWN RD P O BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 12 0007 00036 ADDRESS UHASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 12 0010 00130 BROWN RD S WALTER RICHARD HCCARTHY JR WALTER RICHARD HCCARTHY JR C/0 FCI 332 HINNESOTA ST 82100 ST PAUL HN 55101 38 03-117-23 13 0005 01995 FOX RIDGE RD RIB HACK RAYHOND H HACK 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 21 0001 00025 BROWN RD S S BITTHAN I L BITTHAN SCOTT 8 LISA BITTHAN 25 DROWN RD S LONG LAKE m 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 29 38 03-117*23 12 0002 00036 ADDRESS UNASS16NED CARGILL HAC HILLAN JR ETAL LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES P 0 BOX 9300 DEPT 26 HPLS HN 55990 36 03-117-23 12 0005 00120 BROWN RD S CHARLES E VAN EECKHOUT ETAL CHARLES E VANEECKHOUT 120 DROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 12 0006 00020 DROWN RD S JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 12 0011 00190 BROWN RD S D 8 L COLEHAN JR DOUGLAS R COLEHAN JR 190 DROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 13 0006 01995 FOX RIDGE RD D E KJRrHAN 8 J H KIRKHAN DAVID E 8 JOANNE H KIRKHAN 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 03-117-23 21 0007 00195 BROWN RD S JOHN H WINTON JOHN H WINTON 1319 HARQUETTE AVE 8903 HPLS HN 55903 I.J 1 ) % 1 iij, oJ•‘A.” f ^ B'•si irl RUN DATE 09/06/99 BATCH 507 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 03-117-23 21 0009 00036 ADDRESS UHASSIGNED STATE OF HINN STATE OF NINN IDNR) CLUCE LINE TRAIL) HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 36 03-117-23 21 0019 02010 COLIN DR DOUGLAS W FRANCHOT III DOUGLAS W FRANCHOT III 2010 COLIN DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 30 36 03-117-23 21 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LLOYD S KELLEY LESTER S KELLEY 2135 COLIN DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWtIER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 03-117-23 21 0019 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN P EARLING JOHN P EARLING 2135 COLIN DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0020 00032 APPLE GLEN RD K V BIGELOW I J T BIGELOW KENNETH I JUDY BIGELOW 32 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0060 00096 CREEKSIDE DR J T PASTER I A L PASTER JANES T PASTER 96 CREEKSIDE LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0063 00069 CREEKSIDE DR HARY ANN HANSEN HARY ANN HANSEN 69 CREEKSIDE DR LONG LAKE m 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0072 00091 APPLE GLEN RD D J DUDINSKY ET AL DAVID J DUDINSKY 91 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 36 39-116-23 99 0003 00135 ORONO ORCHARD RD N EDMUND W F RYDELL EDMUND RYDELL 135 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0021 00026 APPLE GLEN RD JAYE ANN ZULLO JAYE ANN ZULLO 26 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0061 00052 CREEKSIDE DR J L OHHAN IRA OHHAN JOHN L OHHAN 52 CREEKSIDE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0069 00093 CREEKSIDE DR R G ROACH I K A ROACH ROBERT G I KIMBERLY A ROACH 93 CREEKSIDE DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0073 00035 APPLE GLEN RD N E i H J STRUZIK NICHOLAS E STRUZIK 35 APPLE GLEN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 93 0019 00036 APPLE GLEN RD H E I H B GUTHRIE HARY I HITCHELL GUTHRIE 36 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0022 00020 APPLE GLEN RD T W WOLLIN • H R WILLIN THOMAS I HELANIE WOLLIN 20 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0062 00056 CREEKSIDE DR H t J BERNS MICHAEL E I JOLYNN M BERNS 56 CREEKSIDE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0070 00025 APPLE GLEN RD S C FEDIE I W L FEDIE STEVEN C t WENDY L FEDIE 25 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0079 01960 KENNEDY LA L R DANIELSON/N H DANIELSON LEE R i NANCY H DANIELSON 1960 KENNEDY LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 (. .)—• J -i "-V ' • f-1 ^ s ) RUN DATE 09/06/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 507 PROP ADDR OWNER HAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 39-118-23 93 0075 01965 KENNEDY LA NANCY E PETERSON NANCY E PETERSON 1965 KENNEDY LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 39-118-23 93 0063 00010 DROWN RD S D P I L A ERICKSON DAVID P ft LISA ANN ERICKSON 10 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 31 72 39-118-23 93 0081 00055 VALLEY VIEW RD G W ANDERSON ft S J ANDERSON GREGORY W ft SALLY J ANDERSON 55 VALLEY VIEW RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-116-23 93 0062 00016 BROWN RD S JUDY L KELLETT JUDY L KELLETT 18 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 507 00090 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE • a:v.-i, .1 ¥ ) L '. ■. • r. /'. • . * ;) ! . •• . / •ll..- « ‘•M Tr ‘ \ \ THZ R. 23 u\nr SEC.34,T.118,R.23r~/L/'^isrAtor ^ei4ft&A<Y ) \ t i *U k :ii* n^tii) y ni.M / [^‘\ (18) m _'.'« WM 7 m-*4‘*r§ ■ C7) % V« ■'■ f» \ h:w \ f\ / !i*rf *n. ' 1 ■ ORONO PLANNING CO>EVnSSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 J #2488 GREGG KLOHN, CONTINUED KJohn staled he would like the application to be tabled. • * - . ‘ Hav/n Inquired whether he would be willing to waive the 60 day time limft. ♦ • Klohn indicated that would be fine. Berg moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2488,4455 North Shore Drive, to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans, and to extend the 60 day time limit to 120 days. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#11) #2490 CHARLES AND SUE VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Charles Van Eeckhout was present. Gaffron stated the Applicants are requesting to subdivide a 20 acre parcel to create nine sewered building sites ranging from 1.0 acre to 18 acres In area. This proposal would require rezonlng the area from RR-1B, Single Family, 2 Acre, to R-1A, Single Family, 1 acre; extension of the sanitary sewer from the City of Long Lake; expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area; variances to the back lot ordinance; creation of a private road in a substandard corridor; variances to lot width; creation of a shared driveway crossing of Long Lake Creek; construction of a road or driveway through at least two delineated wetlands; creation of a wetland outlet for Park; and construction of an 800 foot private driveway extending from the private road to serve Lot 4. Charles Van Eeckhout slated that he has owned the property for the past 29 years. Van Eeckhout slated that he has done other subdivisions within the City of Orono and has made it a point to avoid the need for variances as much as possible. Before purchase of this property. Van Eeckhout commented that he checked with the City of Orono regarding what regulations existed regarding possible subdivision of this area and that this proposal encompasses essentially what he was told he could do at that time. Van Eeckhout stated that In 1975, the City rezoned this area, which changed this area from a one acre density to two acre, and that rezoning should be considered as a taking of value, and that this property should be allowed to be developed under one acre standards as he was originally told. Van Eeckhout remarked that he did not receive any compensation for the taking, which In his opinion decreased the value of his property. Van Eeckhout noted that a lot of new rules and regulations have been adopted by the City over the years, and requested that the Planning Commission rezone this area back to what it originally was at the time of purchase. Ga^ron commented that the City of Orono would disagree with the opinion that the rezoning was a taking. Van Eeckhout stated that he has quarter acre lots to the north adjacent to his property, one acre lots on the northwest, and one acre lots to the south, and wetlands to the east. Van Eeckhout remarked that In essence his property was spot zoned at the time the area was rezoned. Van Eeckhout commented that this subdivision would contain one acre lots, which in his opinion are Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COM>nSSION MEETLNG MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2490 CHARLES AND SUE VAN EECKHOUT, CONTINUED sufficient lots, noting that two acre lots would cost more, and that due to environmental concerns because of its location by Long Lake Creek, this area should be connected to City sewer. A laipe number of trees also exist on the property which cannot be cut down. Van Eeckhout stated that he would like to have a forester out there to review the situation to determine whether some of the trees can be cut down to help the undergrowth grow back. Van Eeckhout stated he Is willing to work with City Staff on these issues. Lindquist remarked that he understands Van Eeckhout's position on the taking, but that Is an issue for the City Council. Lindquist commented that in his opinion this area should remain zoned at two acres. Hawn stated she Is In agreement with Lindquist and that the Planning Commission does not do rezoning. Hawn remarked that this area might be a potential site for a PRD and might lend itself to some cluster development. Van Eeckhout commented that In his opinion under this sketch plan there Is sufficient spacing for the proposed residences, noting that he would not have a problem with doing a PUD on this area as he has presented it tonight. Stoddard stated that he also concurs that this Is an issue for the City Council to determine, noting that the Planning Commission is a recommending body and it does not appear that the Planning Commission would recommend rezoning of this area. Stoddard remarked that the City also needs to make a determination on whether this area should be included In the Metropolitan . Urban Service Area. Hawn noted that this application Is driven by whether or not the Applicant can rezone this property and that issue should be resolved first before further consideration is given to this sketch plan. Gaffron stated that the area south of the Luce Line Is zoned two acres, noting that Fox Ridge was developed back In the 1960s. Stoddard commented that the Applicant will also need to determine the type of wetlands that exist on the property. Van Eeckhout stated that In his opinion this area is Incorrectly zoned wetland and he has farmed the wetland area on a regular basis. Van Eeckhout remarked that the wetland Is six feet above the water level. Van Eeckhout commented that in his opinion this area can adequately support nine structures. Lindquist stated that in his opinion this area will probably remain zoned at two acres. Hawn noted that it has was the consensus of the Planning Commission in a meeting regarding the comprehensive plan not to extend sanitary sewer to prevent denser housing. Hawn suggested the Applicant look at a PRD. Van Eeckhout noted that a PRD would require extension of the sewer. Hawn slated that a PRD probably would require extension of the sewer. Page 17 ORONO PLANNING COMIvnSSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2490 CHARLES AND SUE VAN EECKHOUT, CONTINUED Gaffron remarked that If the Applicant took the total buildable acreage of the property and divided It by two, the Applicant might be able to put a maximum of seven homes on this property, • and that clustering may help to preserve some of the natural features of the area. Van Eeckhout commented that the City should take a long-range view as far as It relates to sewer Issues, noting that In his opinion eventually sewer will more than likely be needed In Orono. Gaffron stated this application will go before the City Council at their June 14th meeting, noting that no formal action is needed to be taken by the Planning Commission on this application. (#12) #2491 DEBORAH SHOLL, 4100 WATERTOWN ROAD - SKETCH PLAN Deborah Sholl was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant Is requesting a sketch plan review for a Class III Subdivision • for property located at 4100 Watertown Road, which consists of approximately 37 acres. Approximately two acres is classified as Orono Wetlands and appear on the City Wetland maps. The Applicant Is proposing to create two parcels, with one parcel being approximately 14 acres, 12 acres dry buildable, and the other west parcel would be 23 parcels. Weinberger stated that there was a conditional use permit on this property to allow the keeping of domestic animals for commercial purposes and to allow the continued use of the property for a public riding stable. Following sale of the property, the commercial use of the property has ceased. The property also contains two residential properties on one lot without a conditional use permit for a guest house. The lot was combined v/ith another five acre lot to the northeast in January of 1996. Weinberger remarked that two oversized accessory buildings are located on the property. Oversized accessory buildings are allowed In this district subject to the condition that not more than one oversized accessory structure shall be permitted on any property. An oversized structure Is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area In excess of 1,000 square feet. The total footfrint area for the tv/o accessory buildings Is 14,497 square feet. A number of variances would be required for this subdivision due to the oversized accessory buildings. Variances would be required to permit two oversized accessory buildings on one 12 acre lot where one Is allowed; to permit two oversized accessory buildings larger than the 3,000 square feel maximum allowed for oversized accessory structures; and to permit 14,497 square feet for alt accessory buildings where 6,000 square feet is allowed. Variances are also needed for setbacks to the houses and the guest house. There are also some structures located on the property without a principal structure. Weinberger staled that the use of an accessory building for keeping animals for non-commercial purposes Is a permitted use provided It Is for the non-commercial use of the property owner or resident and meets the available area standards, which requires that a minimum of tv/o acres of open pasture must be available for a single horse and one additional acre must be available for each additional horse. V/eInberger staled that Watertown Road Is a City owned right-of-way. The Subdivision Code requires the north 33 feet of Watertown Road be dedicated to the City. The portion of the property dedicated is not considered as lot area. i Page 18 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 lA (#5) #2490 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present along with Tom Loucks, Planner. Gafifron stated the Applicant is requesting City Council direction regarding potential rezoning of this site to allow Wgher density housing. TTiis lot is comprised of 20 acres, with roughly 12 to 14 acres being dry buildabie. This lot is located outside of the MUSA, but an issue for City Council consideration is whether this property should be developed with City sewer regardless of whether it is rezoned. A third item for consideration is whether Council believes the site should be considered for a Planned Residential Development. Gaffron stated the Applicant presented a sketch plan to the Planning Commission which called for nine sewered building sites ranging in size from 1.0 acre to 1.8 acre. The Planning Commission did not offer the Applicant much direction as they felt that the City Council should determine whether this property should be rezoned and whether City sewer should be provided. Loucks stated that this 20 acre parcel has unique characteristics, noting that the site abuts the City of Long Lake as well as the Long Lake sewer lines. The site is adjacent to some two acre developments as well as a number of one-third to one acre residential developments in Long Lake. Loucks requested that the City Council consider the possibility of a PRD for this property. Loucks stated the proposed lots range from 15,000 to 20,000 feet to 1.5 acres with a diversity of housing being contemplated. The Applicant will attempt to preserve as much of the natural features of this property as possible. Gaflfron stated that a zoning code amendment requires a 4/5's majority vote, noting that this property would not need to be rezoned in order to do a PRD if density standards are met. The number of units being proposed does exceed the number that could be accomplished through a standard two acre plat, and a PRD does not allow the City to increase the density, hence this proposal for nine lots on 12 - 14 acres would require rezoning. Kelley commented that he is not in favor of rezoning, but would support a PRD with seven lots and hookup to City sewer. Mayor Jabbour thanked the Applicant for his efforts in attempting to preserve the natural characteristics of this property. Kelley remarked that he was unsure whether onsite sewer sites would be available on this site due to the topography and wetlands that exist. Flint inquired if the zoning is not changed, how a PRD would assist the Applicant. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2490 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) Loucks stated under a PRD they would be able to have lots that are less than two acres as long as the density standard is not exceeded. Flint inquired what the density standard is for this lot. Loucks stated the area will need to be calculated, but in his view there is approximately 16 acres of upland. Loucks stated they are willing to work with City Staff on this matter. Sansevere stated he was in agreement with Kelley on the density. Peterson commented that she also was in agreement with Kelley regarding the density. Mayor Jabbour stated that in his view a PRD would be appropriate, noting that he is amenable to extending City sewer to this property. (#6) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present, along with Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law. Weinberger stated that the Applicant's reforestation plan was denied at the last City Council meeting, with a revised plan having been submitted by the Applicant today. The Applicant is proposing to add a number of trees, which increases the canopy cover over the entire property. The City's consulting forester is recommending a minimum spacing of 25 feet which wU allow for greater canopy coverage when the trees mature. Bedker is recommending that any plan submitted by the Applicant restore a minimum of 90 percent of the estimated 14,450 square feet of tree canopy that was removed. The Applicant's plan achieves 83 percent canopy restoration over the 25 year period. Bedker is ready to recommend adoption of the plan with the recommended changes. Weinberger stated the issues for consideration by the City Council include the right to review the subject property by City Staff to ensure eventual full restoration on the property. Staff is recommending that a letter of credit be on file with the City to ensure reforestation of this property as well. Reznick stated according to his understanding, the Applicant's landscape architect was to meet with the City's forester, which has been done, and the recommendations of the City's forester 8 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 I AND USE GOALS AND POLICIES Orono’s Land Use Plan is based upon the following goals and policies which in turn have been actively developed by Orono residents over the last 25 years. I AND USF GOALS 1. TO REINFORCE ORONO'S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMITMENT. 2. TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORIC IDENTITY AND CHARACTER OF THE SEPARATE URBAN AND RURAL NEIGHBORHOODS. 3. TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE PLACES FOR A VARIETY OF LOCAL RESID^TIAL, EDUCATIONAL, RECREATIONAL, INDUSTRIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES. 4. TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOODS FROM ENCROACHMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES. 5. TO COORDINATE ORONO’S LAND USES WITH THAT OF NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES. 6. TO COORDINATE LAND USES AND DEVELOPED DENSITY WITH THE FINANCIAL AND PHYSICAL CAPABILITIES OF THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES. fiFNFRAL LAND USE POLIClES^ 1. THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA) IS FIXED. Orono*s Urban Service Area (MUSA) and Sewer Service Area (MSSR) are fixed by this and the other elements of the Community Management Plan and are legally described by Resolution of the City Council as shown on Map No. 6. 2. ORONO'S LAND USE PLANS WILL BE BASED UPON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. Land use policies will encourage the wise use and management of natural resources while prohibiting their misuse, abuse, overuse or exploitation. CMP 4-12 i JUNE, 1980 I AND \}SR C 3. 4. 5. 6. decrLsing^th^iater quality. Developed land use densities will be determined by between known levels of volume and pollution generation and known marshland capacity for ponding and nutrient assimilation. the wetlands and marshlands of the “^Qy|^Qpg®*^sPACES?^^D^S THE ta.117. r. possiMe. the City will acquire open space and flo g ments for conservation of these lands. PROTECTION OF LAKE ^^°^^^^^^pponwDING ^D^EXCESSI^^ENCROACHMENT. enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and EXCbbbxvr. in coSioLance with Mn. ^NR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational * Orono will prohibit overly dense within 1,000 feet of Lake .^ceLiveregulations will be promoted to limit excess! boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed provide reasonable control over building densi y, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. lake shorelines will be protected iH.lt or, lave water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same ° development which can be destructive ^ot regulated. Natural vegetation in shorela will be preserved insofar as practical and reas able in order to retard surface ^"“^cietr- cutting will be prohibited. wave action erosion, material stone r p P shoreline protection will be encouraged. CMP 4-13 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 7. DEVELOPMENT OR ALTERATION OF FLOODPLAINS WILL BE RESTRICTED. Most of the City's identified floodplains are located along the shoreline or within designated marshlands and will be protected by regulations applicable to those areas. In addition, where floodplains do exist on otherwise dry buildable land, construction, filling or alteration will be strictly controlled so as to avoid flow restrictions, to avoid flood level increases on other properties, and to avoid costly flood damage or pollution dangers. 8. NATURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF ALL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS. This will include topographical information, soil analysis, drainage plans, vegetation plans, erosion control measures and similar site data related to each project, whether public or private. 9. ORONO'S LAND USE PLAN WILL PROMOTE THE PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE, LIGHT AND AIR. Sufficient open spaces will be provided in each neighborhood and on each lot to prevent overcrowding and to ensure adequate light, air and recreation for all residents. 10. PRIVATE STEWARDSHIP OF LAND AND RESOURCES IS PREFERABLE TO INFLEXIBLE PUBLIC CONTROL. Private ownership, maintenance and stewardship of the land, including open space and many types of improvements, is favored over public ownership as being in the best and most beneficial interests of the property owner and the public, providing for more intimate, responsive and economical land management. 11. ALL L.'ND Ol'INERS MUST HAVE EQUAL LAND USE OPPORTUNITIES. ^:o land owner should be denied the right to develop his land by any staged growth, land banking or no-growth policy, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and require­ ments of the Community Management Plan. 12. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY. Land development should respect and enhance neighboring properties and existing developed character of the neighborhood and the City, preserving the value of the land and the integrity, stability and beauty of the community. CMP 4-14 f f a* I I a LAND USE JUNE, 1980 a i a a ii 13. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT. Land development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features always produces more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density. 14. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DEVELOPMENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. Whenever required. Improvements must be provided by the developer. Because the City has limited staff and limited bonding potential, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to increased land use density. In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configura­ tions, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform. City- established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. DEVELOPERS MUST DEDICATE LANDS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. CMP 4-15 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 lieu of lands the developer may be required to contribute funds for the municipal ° such lands or the improvement of such facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect density increase from multiple small developmen n xTr^ TaMn MTTT RF DEVELOPED UNLESS IT'S LOCATION AND PHYSICAL c SaSristi « X sSi?ab1S for the proposed use in accordance WITH THIS PLAN. Land to be developed must be of such size, character and location that it can e safely used for the intended purpose without danger to health, without peril from fire, flood or other occurrence and without undue impact upon neighboring properties. NO land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision of the community. HRAAN LAND USE POLICIES. 1.THE MAJORITY OF ORONO'S URBAN ?.A:Zh WILL BE RESER^D FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. Orono's urban residential neighborhoods will provide the opportunity for e variety o housing types and price ranges. Maay urban residen will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive environmental conditions. Low- ens y multi-family residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation services, but will not be appropriate within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. CMP 4-16 ^, I « C' ■ i ki k LAND USE JUNE, li>80 2. LIMITED COMMERCIAL AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE BUSINESSES. The primary function of Orono’s commercial areas will be to provide those commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residen s. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature which would duplicate existing services in the neighboring town centers will be discouraged. 3. LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS AND LIMITED LAKE-USER SERVICES. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishing supplies, boat service and boat repair facilities which are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limite to areas where full urban servicesj including municipal sanitary aeuer, and adequate transportation are available. 4. THE CITY WILL ENCOURAGE PRIVATE UNIFICATION AND COO^INATION OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL AREAS. Unplanned strip commercial developments will be discouraged. Coordinated projects designed to aesthetically enhance, unify and identify the business areas will be encouraged. 5 FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO THE AREA OF THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL PARK. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is entirely consistent with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. CMP 4-17 LAND USF JUNE, 1980 6. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT V7ILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ADVERSELY AFFECT NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. The location and scale of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach . upon the primary residential land uses in Orono. Wherever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. PUBLIC URBAN SERVICES MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL FUTURE COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND URBAN-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Commercial, industrial and urban-density residential uses will be permitted only where municipal sanitary sewer, adequate transportation, police and fire protection services are available. :.n addition, commercial, industrial and multi-family residential development will be permitted only w' ere a municipal water system is available for adequate water supply and fire protection. 8. URBAN DEVELOPMENT WILL UTILIZE THE CAPACITY OF EXISTING PUBLIC FACILITIES. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. New urban development will not be permitted if it requires additional unplanned local or regional facilities capacity. 9. THE EXISTING URBAN AREA WILL NOT BE EXPANDED. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. The urban service area will not be expanded into the rural area and urban services and facilities will not be extended into the rural area for purposes of fostering or allowing Increased development in those areas. 10. THE DESIGN AND DENSITY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT WILL BE CONTROLLED TO ASSURE PROTECTION OF LIGHT, AIR AND SOLAR ACCESS FOR NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. Requirements for minimum lot size, amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum building heights will be designed to assure protection of these values for ull urban residents. CMP 4-18 1 I 3 1 I a t i ti l! i d JUNE, 1980 I AND USE " ssssr4?;;=sf " " each urban property. 12 LAND USE STANDARDS WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OF UMAN ENCROACHMENT ON JSe MINNETONKA. Minimum lot width -111 =P«e out doctcs and structural ancroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations will limit the number oer property and the amount of public available for private docking and boat storage. 13. RETENTION OF NATURAL VEGETATION WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OP URBANIZATION AS VISIBLE FROM THE LAKE. Building heights^ L limited to less than the oro- Hinimum green belts will hibitions J^ainst clearcutting^or^ex^ be^preserved^on^slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when be^ to prevent erosion i in which case screened with natural vegetation. RURAL LAND USE POLICIES ORONO'S RURAL SERVICE AREA WILL BB^SER^D FOR PERMANENT LOW-DENSITV residential land use. Orono's iikewise, the delicate balance ^city nutrient loading Slt^oit major environmental problems for ?h«efore, the ideal land use for that Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area (MUSA) is the planned low-density rural residential iaHruse! commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. 1. CMP 4-19 Li LAND USE JUNE, 1980 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ORONO'S RURAL SERVICE AREA PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY FOR QUASI AGRICULTURAL LAND USES. Greenhouses, orchards, truck farms, riding stables and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. RURAL DENSITY IS LIMITED BY NATURAL CONDITIONS. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including extensive wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, which factors influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems. THE EXISTING RURAL AREA WILL NOT BE URBANIZED. Orono*s Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. The urban service area will no_t be expanded into the rural area. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and rural land use density will-be maintained at a level to ensure that private on-site sewer systems will operate satisfactorily and that rural wetlands and drainageways will not be overloaded with storm water nutrient pollution. RURAL LAND USES AND DENSITIES DO NOT REQUIRE URBAN SERVICES. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. RURAL LAND USES DO NOT REQUIRE MUNICIPAL SEWER SERVICE. Orono*s soil, topography and low-density rural land use provide the ingredients necessary to ^ assure safe, adequate, permanent on-site sewage treatment and waste water disposal without hazard to ground water, surface water or the public health. CMP 4-20 I I i ■ JUNE, 1980 1 AND USE 7. r,TTT RP SUBJECT TO PROVEN ON-SITE SEWAGE- TREATMENT dev!?op"^nfL the rural SXhe^ccnting.nt .t-,^^“ri'te'’rontli:i -^?Lre^ftriU:i^^rara fo afl%:telop.e^ acceptable primary drainfield area, -.-ij area ??rzoning^Lerreq^rementr?rr rura^ Orono will ri!a':re ?:„r«ti:ri;e ”t?Tc:a:afe! wetle^nae. streams or areas of high water table. 8. RURAL DEVELOPMENT MUST BE SELF-SUPPORTING. Allfuture development in the rural area will be required to be proven „iy, in?ended use . i:pr^ve::rt pairteiiince , lT.l\olrlTeT. :fteifi:rof costly urban services into the rural area. HUHAL land USE DENSITIES WILL ALLOW MAXIMUM RETENTION OF PRIVATE WOODf --rdairs^;esrt:s-^;rt4n t in, t^^^^ traditional vistas of open fields The retention of these woodlands la-ds will then assure permanent habitat tor our Abundant wildlife. Public open space will be provided on a large-scale _ Reserve Basis, but neighborhood or mini-parks kre unnecessary because of the of available privately owned and maintaine open space . 10 RURAL WETLANDS AND MARSHLAND WILL BE PROTECTED FOR sS^CE WATER RETENTION AND , total population in the watershed iltrition the to?al piant^ril11 inc'^6as6. Orono s rurax xaii r furru:uh\:f :rr:trnti:rj:fd; :rd ru^ri-nt “cycled" urbln'slorm'wVt^^^ filtration. 9. CMP 4-21 LAND USE JUNE, 1980 11. RURAL LAKESHORE AREAS V7ILL HAVE DUAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. The low-density residential land uses will automatically reduce environmental pressures on the shoreline. In addition, the rural areas will be subject to the same shoreline protection performance standards as the urban areas. Including minimum setbacks, green belts, clear- cutting prohibitions and lake use regulations. Taken together, these factors should preserve to a large extent the original appearance of Orono's rural shoreline as seen from the lake. THE LAND USE PLAN MAP NO. 6 INDICATES THE BASIC LAND USE PLAN OF THE CITY: THE DESIGNATION OF ORONO'S URBAN SERVICE AREA T^D ORONO'S RURAL SERVICE AREA. The detalle location of the dividing line (the MUSA line) between the Urban Service Area and the Rural Service Area has been established by careful evaluation of each of the elements of this Community Management Plan. Environmental concerns, historic land use patterns, and the availability of sewer, transportation and other public facilities all enter into the local decision of actual MUSA line location. Orono's Urban Service Area identifies those portions of the City that have been provided with public services and facilities necessary to support urban types and densities of land use as defined by the Metro­ politan Council's Development Framework Guide. Orono's Rural Service Area identifies those portions of the City that do not have urban services and are not planned to have urban services. Orono's Rural Service Area is intended to permanently accommodate General Rural Land Uses housing densities defined by the Metropolitan Council, and as distxnctly different from a Commercial Agricultural region. Orono's MUSA line location as shown on Map No. 6 has been legally describe and established by City Council Resolution No. 1135 adopted April 14, 198( This Resolution is included in the CMP Appendix. The detailed location of this line will not be changed without further official action of the City Council. Orono's MUSA line location as shown on Map No. 6 is consistent with the broad-brush location of the MUSA line as drawn by the Metropolitan Counci- Orono's MUSA line location is consistent with the MUSA location and land use plans of adjoining municipalities. Orono's MUSA line location direct affects the detailed land use and facilities plans of the City. MAP NO. 7 INDICATES THE DETAILED LAND USE PLAN OF THE CITY, IDENTIFYING APPROPRIATE LAND USES AND DENSITIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL NEIGHBORHOOD. This land use map will form the basis for land use zoning decisions. CMP 4-22 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 Stated one mistake on the survey is the size of the screen porch should be approximately half the she depicted. There were no public comments. Smith inquired whet^cthe garage being proposed was slightly larger than normal. Bottenberg stated it is a slwly larger garage. Fegers stated part of the reasoml^ the larger garage is the need for a stairway to access the upper and lower floor of the garage. Smith commented she would like to see th^iardcover in this area minimized if possible. Kluth inquired whether the shed still exists on th^^perty. Fegers stated the wind has blown the shed down. Stoddard stated with the acquisition of the adjoining piece oi id. he would tend to look favorably on this application. Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Applicattoa #2545, Lou and Marilyn Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive, granting of a hardcover varianc^^ permit construction of an attached 24* by 30 ’ garage to the west side of their resideira^ubject to the Applicants submitting a revised survey, and further subject to removal of tn^^ed at the time of occupancy of the new structure. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROV/N ROAD SOUTH - SUBDIVISION FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 9:35 p.m. -10:30 p.m. The Certincale of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the City of Orono has received a Preliminary Plat application for a seven lot residential development for property located at 120 Brown Road South. The Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development, which would allow the property to be developed at a two acre density using cluster development and preservation space, Page 23 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 The RR-1B zoning district allows a property to be developed as a PRD as a conditional use. Under a PRD the City can establish setbacks for each of the lots. The Applicant is proposing four lots to be served on a private road, which would gain access from Tract G and ending in a cul-de-sac. The development would also include three larger lots, Lots 5,6, and 7. This property Is located immediately north of the Luce Line Trail and south of the City of Long Lake. Weinberger stated the conditional use permit for the PRD would have the same consideration as the proposal by The Bancor Group regarding use of the land for higher density development with other land being dedicated for other purposes. This application would require a road width variance to allow the road to be developed at less than the minimum requirements. Tract G is platted 40 feel wide where the City requires a minimum platted width for a private residential road to be 50 feet. The Applicant is proposing a 24 foot road. The proposed road would serve as access for the property south of the road as well as potential access for the property to the north and the seven lots being proposed as part of this development, which requires a road width of 28 feet. The subdivision is located within an area containing a number of wetlands as well as lying within the 100 floodplain. This subdivision would require a road crossing of a City protected wetland and located a NURP pond within 26 feet of the City protected wetland. The City Council and the MCWD will need to approve any wetland alteration on site. Weinberger noted the property is located outside of the MUSA area, however, this area is proposed to be serviced by City sewer in the future. It has been determined that this area would not be able to offer private septic due to the number of wetlands and high water table In the area. The DNR has expressed concerns with the proposed sewer extension to the south end of the project, with the intent of the developer and City to extend sewer under the Luce Line Trail. City Staff will continue to work with the DNR on this issue. Weinberger noted that the DNR does have some concerns regarding the extension of sewer under the Luce Line Trail du* :r^ future maintenance issues and would prefer the sewer extension be run along Brown Road. ;t Is C -y's Staff position that the sewer be installed as proposed. Page 24 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY. NOVEMBER 15,1999 Weinberger stated the developer will also need to grant conservation and flowage easements across the wetlands and ponding areas located within the development, with restriction of land alteration and removal of vegetation in all wetland areas and within 75 feet of Long Lake Creek. The DNR is requesting the Applicant dedicate a 50 foot conservation easement over the southern portion of Lot 7. Weinberger stated access to the property is via Tract G. which is not currently owned by the Applicant. Staff is recommending that the owner of Tract G become a joint applicant, with the corridor being replatted as part of the subdivision. The City Engineer and Director of Public Services have recommended the entire access corridor be platted 50 feet In width to provide space for future utilities along the private road. Upon review of the sketch plan by the City Council and Planning Commission, it was determined that this development would be best served by access off of Brown Road and not through the urban area in Long Lake. Weinberger noted the Applicant has submitted additional documentation regarding Tract G for review by the Planning Commission. Weinberger stated Long Lake Creek is a protected tributary and requires a 75 foot setback for hardcover and structure. The driveway to serve Lot 7 would be required to bridge the creek, with a variance being required for the alteration. Park Dedication Fees would be calculated at the standard eight percent of the land value, with a minimum park dedication fee per lot of $2,900 and a maximum of 54,900 per lot. City Staff is recommending that the application be tabled to allow the Applicant additional time to resolve a number of complex issues, which includes the follows; A. The properly owner of Tract G becomes a co-appllcant and agrees to allowing the property to be replatted If he will remain the owner subsequent to plat approval; B. More detailed engineering data is required to ensure lots will be provided with safe driveway access. The City recommends driveways not exceed a ten percent slope; C. Stormwater calculations should be submitted for review to ensure the site can treat all runoff. Stormwater will flow directly to the Long Lake Creek which flows south directly to TanagerLake of Lake Minnetonka; D. City Staff, the applicant, and the DNR shall determine if a Page 25 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 permit can be Issued to cross the Luce Line Trail with sanitary sewer service to Fox Ridge. If it Is determined the sewer service cannot be completed, the City shall review alternatives; E. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for the entire site shall be submitted for additional review. Van Eeckhout stated he has attempted to meet with City Staff to resolve a number of these issues but was unable to due to their busy schedules. Van Eeckhout stated a 40 foot road access was approved previously by the City, with the City further approving installation of utilities to serve these lots based on the zoning in effect at the time. Van Eeckhout noted that these utilities are currently In place and it would be costly to relocate them and realign the right-of-ways. In addition. Van Eeckhout stated, based on legal advice, he has all the rights to build and maintain adequate roads to serve this property without the need to make Mr. Dunn a co-applicant. Van Eeckhout commented that it should not be a problem to construct a road over the wetland. and requested that a variance granted based on the following reasons: one. since the access corridor will not front any building sites, no parking is needed and a 24 foot lane Is the same as a highway lane and should provide adequate driving space. The additional four feet adds little functionability to the roadway and would result in the loss of uees as v/ell as add to the hardcover. Van Eeckhout commented the properties can be served by driveways with a grade of seven percent or less. Van Eeckhout stated the sewer should be extended across the Luce Line as this is the most economical approach. Van Eeckhout remarked that these planning issues can be dealt with after preliminary plat approval and prior to final plat. Van Eeckhout requested that the Planning Commission approve his application subject to the conditions outlined by the Zoning Adminis*'’ator. There were no public comments. Ch?'r Hawn stated she would be happy to comment on the plan in general, but with the location of the road being uncertain at this time, she would have a hard time approving the preliminary plat as proposed. Hawn commented she would also like to see the DNR issues resolved as well prior to Page 26 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 approval being given. Stoddard commented the Planning Commission can provide some direction to the Applicant on how to proceed. Stoddard stated in his view this land does not have the same uniqueness and capability to be developed as the proposal by The Bancor Group. Stoddard stated in his opinion the proposed density for this development is too high and needs to be reduced somewhat, with the other issues needing to be addressed further with City Staff. Nygard stated he is in agreement with Stoddard and has some concerns regarding the issues relating to the creek. Smith commented in her view she is unsure whether this property meets the qualifications for a PRD, noting she also has some concerns regarding the creek crossing and the sewer extension under the Luce Line. Smith noted that the Luce Line in this area is not easily assessible. Smith encouraged the Applicant to continue to work with City Staff to resolve these issues. Chair Havm inquired whether the wetlands would be subject to some type of conservation easement. Van Eeckhout stated he would he willing to discuss that issue with City Staff to see what they think is best for this area. Chair Hawn expressed a concern that some of the lots are too small and should be made larger by incorporating some of the other dry buildable land that is available. Van Eeckhout stated he is attempting to preserve the wooded area as much as possible. Lindquist concurred that some of the lots are too small in his opinion. Van Eeckhout commented with a PRD the overall density is what is considered. Lindquist stated the Planning Commission has not approved density less than one acre in the past, and noted he would not be in favor of doing so in this case. Van Eeckhout remarked that this development is adjacent to Long Lake, which has smaller size lots. Kluth commented in his view the density is too high for this area. Chair Hawn stated she would like to see the issues relating to the sewer extension and creek crossing resolved prior to any approval being given on this application. Page 27 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 Lindquist stated he wants to see a minimum of one acre zoning for this development. Berg stated the Fire Department will probably question the width of the road and request that It be made wider to insure adequate access for emergency vehicles. Chair Hawn commented that it would be appropriate to table this application at this time to allow the Applicant time to resolve some of these Issues. Weinberger noted that there are no conservation areas planned at this time. Gaffron stated in order for a PRD to be approved, the benefits to the City must be shown, and that clustering is utilized to help reduce infrastructure costs or preserve more open space and providing a larger open area by preserving the wetlands. Stoddard commented he would like to see lower density and more outlets for this development. Stoddard stated he would be in favor of a PRD if more benefits could be demonstrated, such as more outlets. Chair Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to table the application at this time to allow him time to resolve these issues. Van Eeckhout stated he would like the Planning Commission to vote on his application tonight. Gaffron stated if the application is denied, it would proceed to the City Council. If the City Council denies it, at that point the Applicant would need to wait six months before submitting a new application. Van Eeckhout commented he would like the input of the City Council as well on his application. Smith stated the Planning Commission would like to see the Applicant be more fully prepared before proceeding to the City Council, noting that the Planning Commission has provided some good direction to the Applicant on how to proceed. Smith indicated she would prefer to review the application again after the Applicant has resolved some of these issues. Hawn moved. Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2550, Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South, per the submitted materials, noting that there is insufficient information available to the Planning Commission in order to make a Page 28 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 responsible decision on the application at this time. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. it be OW It. >uncll ne good £W BUSINESS. CONTINUED (#7M2542 BRUCE HEDBLOM AND CAROL CLINE-HEDBLOM, 2601 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIM^ES. 10:31 p.m. -10:40 p.m. The CertinWe of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Bruce HedbloV Applicant, was present. Bottenberg stated^ Applicant is proposing to remove an existing second story deck and replace it with a 1C.6\y 23.4* three season porch and 10.6' by 9* wood deck. This proposal would not increase the size of tl^space but would change the use. The space will consist primarily of the three season porch and s^^all portion on the end will be deck. Hardcover in the 75-250* setback area will remain the sai Hedblom stated at the time the hou^^as originally constructed in 1972/1973, It met all the required building codes at that time. noted the footprint of the house will not change with this proposal. Hedblom stated he are interw^ed In making the deck more usable by converting It to a three season porch. Hedblom stated his adjoin^ neighbors do not object to this project. There were no public comments. Lindquist inquired why City Staff was recommending deipial on this application. V Bottenberg stated Staff was recommending denial of this ajliplication due to the excessive hardcover that currently exists on the property. Hedblom noted that the hardcover will remain the same. Lindquist commented that there is some plastic underlayment that co^U be removed. Hedblom stated the plastic underlayment adjacent to the house is there fo^rainage purposes, but he would be willing to remove it if requested to do so. Lindquist stated he would like to see the plastic underlayment removed. Undqui«^oted he does not have a problem with the hardcover Page 29 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 ClT Y Ul- UhUNO DATE: December 13,1999 ITEM NO.: J Q Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administratoi^eviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects Background Information Recent sanitary sewer projects have resulted in questions regarding the policy for cost allocations for sewer projects. The last group of sewer expansion projects has included several projects that required substantial lengths of sewer to connect the neighborhoods to the existing sewer system. This is the result of MUSA expansions into existing neighborhoods that are not directly adjacent to existing sewer facilities. In the past, sewer projects were adjacent to existing sewer facilities, so long sections of connecting lines, through unsewered areas, were not required. Ten MUSA expansion areas were included in this last group of projects. Over the past several years seven of these ten projects have been completed. There are three projects ♦hat require substantial lengths of sewer forcemain, through unsewered areas, to connect to existing facilities. These projects are the North Long Lake/ Long Lake Country Club Addition project, Webber Hills project, and the Fox Ridge project. The other seven projects w ere relatively close to existing sewer facilities. Of the three projects listed above, only the North Long Lake project has been completed. Another item for consideration is that along with the ten MUSA expansion areas, the City was provided with 50 additional sewer units. These units can be used to connect existing developed properties that are outside the MUSA line to sewer. Three criteria need to be met for connection of these properties to sewer. They must be existing developed properties, have nonconforming septic systems, and be without adequate replacement sites for a new' septic system. The provision of these additional sewer units was a substantial change in policy for the Metropolitan Council. Historically, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment had to be approved to include any additional properties in the MUSA. This was a very time consuming and difficult process and was seldom done tor individual properties. The City’s policy on assessments for sewer projects has also recently changed. Historically, all of the sewer pioject costs were assessed to the property owners. A change in the Minnesota State Statues resulted in a change in assessment policies. The State Statues limit a project assessment to the benefits received from the project. Because of the relatively low urban densities, some of the sewer projects were quite expensive resulting in assessm-;nt appeals. The City's assessment policy was changed to limit the project assessments to the benefits received from the project. The City then pays the debt ser\ ice on the remaining project costs. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 December 13, 1999 Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects City policy also provides a distinction between projects for assessment purposes. Projects are now classified as either a "mandatory' or "voluntary" project. A mandatory project is required in neighborhoods with a large number of failing septic systems, and no availability of adequate replacement septic sites. Failing septic systems are systems with cesspools or surface discharge of effluent creating a public health hazard. The North Long Lake and Orono Orchards projects were mandatory projects. Voluntary projects are for neighborhoods with nonconforming septic systems. Nonconforming septic systems are systems that do not meet a three-foot separation from the seasonal high ground water level. Nonconforming systems are not an imminent threat to public health. These neighborhoods also generally have replacement septic sites which the owners may not want to use because of loss of trees or yard space. Sewer is being offered to these neighborhoods, as the most desirable permanent solution, on a voluntary basis. If the property owners are interested in sewer, they have to agree to be assessed for all of the project costs. In summary, recent changes have resulted in resident questions regarding cost allocation policies for sanitary sewer projects. These changes are the sew ering of isolated neighborhoods not adjacent to existing MUSA areas, the Metropolitan Council provision of additional sewer units that greatly simplify sewering of properties outside the MUSA line, and changes in the Cin’s assessment policies. One of the three projects that required long forcemains from the existing neighborhoods to existing sewer facilities was the North Long Lake/ Long Lake Countiy Club project. This project was constructed in 1997. Four additional properties along North Brown Road were connected to sewer using the additional Metropolitan Council sewer units. This was a mandatory project with a City subsidy to limit the project assessments to the benefits received from the project. The issue of cost allocation, for the long sections of forcemain outside of the sewered neighborhoods, was not a resident issue for this project. This reason for this was probably because of the reduced project assessments. The other two projects that will require long forcemains from the neighborhoods to e.xisting sewer facilities are the Webber Hills and Fox Ridge projects. These are both voluntaiy projects in which the residents w ill be assessed for all of the project costs. The public hearing for Webber Hills has already been held and plans and specifications are being prepared. The issue of cost allocation for the long forcemain was not an issue for the residents. A public hearing for the Fox Ridge project was held, and the residents were questioning the cost allocation for the forcemain along South Brown Road to the City of Long Lake. The plan presented to the neighborhood was to assess the costs for the entire project, including the Brown Road forcemain to the Fox Ridge residents. They were concerned about paying for the Brown Road Request for Council Action continued Page 3 December 13,1999 Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects forcemain that may provide sewer service to additional properties. Their opinion was that the forcemain costs should be allocated to all property owners who will be using it. A review of the attached map shows ten properties adjacent to the Brown Road forcemain. All of these properties are outside of the MUSA line, and are only eligible for sewer if they meet the criteria for one of the 50 additional sewer units. One of these properties is not eligible to use an additional sewer unit because it is currently undeveloped. Three of the properties have conforming septic systems and are not eligible. The conformity of the septic is unknown on one of the properties. Five properties have nonconforming septic systems with limited possibilities for adequate replacement sites. Three of these would have difficulty even finding one site, and finding a new site plus another replacement site on the other two properties would be difficult. Under the current policies, the other properties in the area are not eligible for sewer. MUSA e.xpansions would be necessary to provide sewer. Most of these properties have newer conforming septic systems with an additional replacement septic site available. Therefore, the sewering of these properties in the near future is extremely unlikely. The Webber Hills project is similar lo the Fox Ridge project. It is also a voluntary project that will be fully assessed. There is a long section of forcemain along South Willow Drive from the neighborhood to the existing sanitarv' sewer facilities. There are three existing homes, along South Willow Drive, outside the MUSA line in this area. Two of the properties have conforming septic systems, and the conformity of the septic system on the third property is unknown. A public hearing was held for the Webber Hills project and the issue of cost allocations was never raised by the property owners. This project contains thirty-seven units in the neighborhood while the Fox Ridge project only contains nine units, so the issue of cost allocations for the sewer in South Willow may not have been an important issue. However, the snme cost allocation method will need to be used for bolt' ’".e Fox Ridge and Webber Hills projects. Cost Allocation Options and Policy There are several options for handling cost allocations for the Fox Ridge project area. One option would be to assess the entire cost of the system, to the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion area. This could be based o i the premise that all of the sewer lines are necessaiy to sewer this neighborhood. This is basicallv the historical city policy, that residents pay for the full cost of sewer to serve their neighborhoods. In the future, if additional properties connect to this sewer they would pay a connection fee to the City. The advantage of this option is that the entire cost could be assessed now and the City would not have any debt service costs. A slightly different variation of the first option would be to contact the eligible property owners along South Brown Road to find out if they are interested in being included in the project. The total project costs could then be evenly split am'^ng all participating property owners. This also provides Request for Council Action continued Page 4 December 13, 1999 Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects the advantage that the City does not have any debt service costs. Any additional properties, with nonconforming septic systems, that decide to request sewer in the future would then pay a project connection fee. Another option could be for the City to include all of the properties along Brown Road that have nonconforming septic systems in the project cost split, and then bank these units for future connection. The owners would then pay a connection fee when they connect to sewer. With this option the City would have to finance the debt service costs for the banked sewer units. With this option the property owners could also be contacted to see if they are interested in obtaining sewer iiow. Any properties that agree to be assessed now would reduce the City's debt service costs. In the above options, all of the area residents would be charged the same cost for sewer. This seems to be a fair and equitable method. A different method could be to separate the costs for the Brown Road forcemain as trunk sewer costs and then charge a trunk sewer cost. This would result in varying costs for sewer in the area. The Fox Ridge residents would then pay for the sewer in the neighborhood plus a trunk sewer cost. The remaining trunk sewer cost would then be charged to the properties that connect into this trunk sewer. This can be a complicated system to determine the appropriate trunk sewer charges and to administrator. It is often used in bigger Cities that are planning to develop at urban densities in which all properties will be sewered. Orono is a unique community in regards to providing sanitary sewer. The City's plan has been to develop at a two or five acre density using septic systems for wastewater treatment. This makes it difficult to develop a trunk sewer system. The costs for sewer are very high, and there is no certainty that all properties will connect to sewer. This could result in the City incurring costs for the installation of trunk sewer lines with uncertainty in recouping these costs. Our staff recommendation is that a trunk sewer cost system is not very appropriate for Orono. A system where all residents in a certain project area pay the same amount for sewer is the most equitable system and easiest to administer. Staff Recommendation Because of the uncertainty regarding the potential and liming of properties connecting to sewer at some time in the future, str.ff recommends that only those properties with an imminent need to connect to sewer be added to a sewer project. StafTs recommendation is that the current policy, which requires the properties in the sewer project area to pay the full cost of the sewer, remain in place; with the addition of an option to add properties to an initial project area if they have an imminent need to connect to sewer. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to clarify the sewer cost allocation policy, particularly in relation to the Fox Ridge sewer project. i ^ I /•% . ■ (.111 '■ IXI •• n * *?v *• (*nl 1 (4iJ . > l=l^J •3(.Vi 1 •Vii* •‘3<J* ** 1■ Un i 1 ^ 1 • - • ^‘rW ’ . • ^■ C^) ■rs =:■ »* » 1 4 r■ r^ri.• m 1 ■ fi' ‘“‘1 2 A.t 9 « •iUi (ly Jrf- iii •__«:lio< ivt t s (%1 ,/;,3 1 m (Ul ^ ffij X 1 (?a 4 ‘^‘’a f <^i ^ cm a 1 •• c:i ®) cAj i 1 iS)*H(.f?a 1 CIO < •1 -S-i5i ■=rr-£-^g.»7W;?y7 *T ’e- f?M % \ \ CMI J . CSI *(m <. I » .t. . LiiLf • ^ &;xj cifi n * I Si x: ni |. I fm '“fa /li a • 1 fa T rrtf.i • cm I t,n JL*it /a:» 3/ro <25 «C. 4C« Mou<£^foU\AiM^ C « C<7N^(11M1146 jr.» M/J $E€. m TJir E. Jc CCVT LOT 7 ■?• SrZ.Z,lA\7,t\.Zi •.* \ f V, U ^ A B B »j^ 1 a •rwT* .{?• •( M.U-O «1 VB Mt(.•%» •• \ 3 8 \•/ W<kfvicisA '■.V»xiV.3^-s7» (0^ 2 •* V 1 Vn.? *«•• a »»• I •• ». • rrn mots ii^n •• wt' © 'f ’ *f^^)Kl'/'V\(,'lsAv -’® )'-c| h^iki ? CCvT LCr 5 GOVT LC* a /. I /\ NN > : KtoMOiNfOVLMlia^ • C0UC0HMIU6 © •: • 1 •; 1 « f f fl ^ f ; t f %ff ! 11 n 1 1 f 1 1 1 PartXX.J TT Lake Classen PartX L Part XIXS3 ke ^ " T Part DC ni r / r Jr part XVI Stubbs Bay PartD Part Xm Part XXX Part XXI iPartm -1 Long Like XI Partly Is fTlP3r! Part XXXI vsmmr9li!E 1 /> PartXXU I_____ Part XIV \Part XXV Maxwell Bay Part XVII r» hl:'J Part XXVII/ Tcnagei Lcke, ^^Qwn’sBe^ PartVn Part XU 1 <Part Mil C<) c\<^ x"*. PartXXM PartXVni Part XXMn •4M U V V —»Part 2=j> '5:2? 7^a 5».t% / CURREaVTMl Parti Nav Part II Oro; Partni Hac' Part IV Hen PartV Che Pan VI Mtk Part VII Coil PartVm Cryr Part DC Fuk PartX HigI Part XI Higl PartXn Nort Part Xu;650 • PartXTV Fair PartX'V Lon£ PartXM Stub Part XVII Orot PartXVin Netti PartXDC Nort: Part XX Lon£ Part XXI East PartXXn Oron PaitXXin Fox I Part XXIV'Web' Part XXV Edge ■ Part XXVI Brad ’ PartXXVn Foxh PartXX'Vm Ba>T Part XXIX Oron Part XXX Dillc Proposed ML’SA A Part XXXI Max% •Annexed :o City of »• •• • • « REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COi MPET'NQ DEC 1 3 W” Cl IY ur unUYU DATE: December 13, 1998 ITEM NO, Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Schedule Public Hearing for East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project A preliminary feasibility study was prepared for this project and was presented to the residents at a neighborhood meeting on December 1st. The project contains eleven properties, ten developed parcels and the City of Orono's Summit Beach Park. All eleven of the parcels were used to calculate the project assessments. Summit Beach Park was included to ensure fairness among all of the property owners. This is also a heavily used park and, in the future, the CiQr may wish to consider the installation of rest room facilities in this park. Six of the septic systems in this area are nonconforming to the 3-foot separation rule, with three of these systems failing because of surface discharges or cesspools. The lot sizes in this area vary from 1/2 acre to two acres. The three lots with the failing systems range in size from 1/2 acre to one acre, with extremely limited space for a replacement septic system because of steep slopes and wetlands. The other lots with nonconfroming septic systems have limited replacement areas. Unfortunately, most of the lots with conforming septic systems had new septic systems installed during the time period when the new septic regulations were enacted, and before the fmal decisions on the new sewer projects were made. Almost all of the neighborhood residents attended the meeting or contacted staff prior to the meeting. A majority of the property owners, with conforming septic systems still support the project, but have requested an exclusion from the project. They are willing to connect at a future date and pay the appropriate connection fee. A majority of the residents with noncorming septic systems support the project. This is proposed to be a fully assessed sewer project. Two options lor sewer were discussed at the neighborhood meeting. A gravity sewer option with a lift station at an estimated cost of $31,000 per unit. The residents were not interested in this option because of the high cost. The other option presented was for a pressure sewer system at an estimated assessment of $13,900. For this option the property owners are required to purchase, operate and maintain their own residential grinder pump station. For other pressure sewer system projects, the property owners were allowed to include an allowance in the assessment for the pu.-hase of their grinder pump station. If the residents decide to receive the $4,500 grinder pump allowance, the estimated project cost will be $18,400. The residents are in favor of the pressure sewer system because of the lower cost and less disturbance to the neighborhood. We have meet with the Long Lake City Administrator and City Engineer regarding this project and the Fox Ridge project. The City of Long Lake had reviewed and approved this project as part of the 1996 MUSA expansion. The City has sent a letter concerning connection charges and procedures for sewer billing. The City of Long Lake will require a $1,700 per unit connection fee and will bill Orono for the actual metered flows. The Long Lake connection charge has been included in the project assessment. Of the eleven properties included in the project, four properties have conforming septic systems and the owners have requested exclusion from the project. An additional property owner may request exclusion if he can prove that his septic system is conforming. Summit Beach Park is one the properties in the project, and the City will need to cover the debt service for this property. If this project is approved the City will need to finance the debt service on either five or six $13,900 assessments. This debt service cost will be approximately $8,900 per year for six assessments. Our staff recommendation is that tliis sewer project is necessary because of the numerous failing septic systems and extremely limited septic system replacement areas on these properties. If the Council would like to move the project forward, the next step is to formally order and accept the feasibility study and then schedule a public hearing. The proposed date for the public hearing is for the regularly scheduled Council meeting on January 10th. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project. Motion to approve resolution accepting the feasibility study and scheduling a public hearing for the East Long Sanitary Sewer Project for 7:00 P.M. on January 10, 1999 f » F<iiU«3 NC = comfV»«*n^ *y««r Buirt’ EA.ST LOMG A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE THE EAST LONG LAKE AREA WHEREAS, the project area was included in the recent MUSA expansion for sanitary sewer sendees, a neighborhood informational meeting was held to discuss the project, and project area residents have submitted a written request indicating interest in obtaining sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has provided preliminar>' cost estimates for a sanitary sewer extension; however, additional information is needed in order to establish the feasibility of such a project; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that municipal sanitary sewer trunks and/or laterals be constructed to serve the East Long Lake area and that the benefitted propert) (s) be assessed for all of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study, and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessar>\ cost effective, and feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 13 th day of December, 1999. ATIEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vec, City Clerk A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON EAST LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.of the Council adopted December 13 , 1999, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer in reference to the East Long Lake sanitary sewer improvement, and this report was received by the Council on December 13,1999; and WHEREAS, the report provides infomiation regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. The Council will consider the installation of such sanitary sewer improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $202,000. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed iniprovement on the 10th day of January , 2000 in the Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Feasibility Report East Long Lake Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota December, 1999 File No. 139-99-105 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates .••‘J *iiOC<*»:fS me ts m* Af*trm»tfive .’^cTton CppcrTuntty Eirois. Pfinc'pjfs Otto G Bcr'^st^co • Jo?«p^ C Ande'.i* PE • So^v.»i« PE • ? Coo*t. r*E • 7c5e'! G Sc-uoicf'r PE • Jer»y a Bourdon. PE • .7ooe''t W ^icicne. Pz 7ic*'.»'d £ "-mer P£ ^nd Suj.»n vi Eoeriin. CPA. Senior Consultants Aiioci^te Pfincip^lt How4«rd ^ S*«nforcJ. PE • Keitrt A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfeffcrie. PB • R<cn.ifd W Foster. PE • C '.osuct^ PE • Robert C Russefc AIA • Vt.uit A Hanson, PE • ViCt'ttCl T Rciutm.irr ®E • Te^ < * eld P£ • Kenretn P Arde'SOn PE • Vt>rW R Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Wiiii.^mson. P£ . L S • "Jccert F Kotsmin • A-res M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices Paul Rochester “*ar and St Cloud. VM • .Viiwaukee. Wi Engineers & Architects Decembers, 1999 Uet'. . ..o*‘ies?'30 cor- Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 Re: Feasibility Report East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer File No. 139-99-105 Dear Ma /or and Council: As directed by City staff, we have reviewed the existing conditions and the possible sanitary sewer service to the East Long Lake area in Orono. The properties are located along Old Long Lake Road and East Long Lake Road near the east shore of Long Lake as shown on Figure 1. The area consists of ten residential units and a City of Orono park. All residences are served by on-site septic systems. The City Park has no sewer system and is currently served by out houses. Current City records indicate the follow ing septic system status for the ten residential units. • 3 units Failing systems • 2 units Non-compliant systems • 4 units Compliant systems • 1 unit Compliance unknown The units with failing systems have no alternate septic sites existing on the property. Two sanitary sewer options were studied as part of this report. The first option is a gravity sewer system as shown on Figure 2. The gravity sewer would be installed in the roadway and will require the complete street reconstruction. Flows will be routed to a lift station that will be constructed on the City Park property near the existing parking lot. Flows would be then be pumped from the lift station to an existing manhole on Old Long Lake Road in the City of Long Lake. The property identified as # 6 on Figure 2 would need to be served by a grinder pump due to the low elevation of the home. All other properties would be served by gravity. The street would be restored to its original grade and section. Disturbed lawns would be regraded and restored with sod. The second option is to install a pressure sewer system to serve all eleven properties as shown on Figure 3. With this option a small diameter (2 ”-3") forcemain would be installed along the edge of the roadways. The fc-cemain would outlet into an existing manhole on Old Long Lake Road in the City of Long Lr. j. Indiv.Jual grinder pumps would be required to serve each of the eleven propeities. Services would be extended from the common forcemain to the property lines at a location determined by the property owner. Property owners would be responsible for the cost of the sewer installation between the sewer stub at their property line and their home. AH disturbed areas would be restored as part of the project cost. This option would require minimal 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651*636-4600 ■ Fax; 651-636-1311 street disturbance and restoration. Either option will require a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Estimated costs for the two options are summarized below: East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Option Estimated Cost Per Unit Gravity Sewer $31,000 Pressure Sewer $13,900 The estimated cost for the Pressure Sewer does not include costs for the individual grinder pumps. The City has indicated that a $4,500 allowance could be added to the assessment for the purchase of an individual grinder station. This would allow for the payment of the grinder station over time. The total assessment would then be $18,400. The estimated cost to install the gravity sewer is nearly twice the cost of the pressure system and is therefore much less desirable. A public informational meeting was held on December 1, 1999 where 6 of the 10 residential properties were represented. Those attending the meeting that wanted sanitary sewer were unanimously in favor of the pressure sewer system. The construction of the sanitary sewer to serve the East Long Lake area is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is necessary because of the failing and non-conforming septic systems, lack of alternate septic sites and potential pollution problems. The capital cost as well as operation and maintenance costs have been considered in determining that the project is cost effective. The cost of these improvements are interrelated and should be assigned equitably to all properties. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Orono City Council: 1. That this Report be adopted as the guide for installation of sanitary sewer to serve the East Long Lake area. 2. 3. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing. That a public hearing be held on the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost of $202,000 should be incorporated in the public notice. The total estimated cost of $202,000 includes a 5 percent contingency, a 20 percent allowance for design, inspection, legal, and administration costs, and a 5 percent allowance for capitalized interest and bonding costs during construction. Cost estimates are based on 1999 construction costs and can be related to the ENR cost index for December, 1999 of 6127. The cost estimate does not include easement costs that could be incurred on the project. The installation, operation and maintenance of the individual grinder stations and the connection of the sewer to the homes will be the responsibility of the property owners. Detailed cost estimates are attached for your review. The project could be constructed in 2000 if plans and specifications are ordered by February, 2000. We would anticipate an early summer bid date and late summer construction if the project was constructed in 2000. We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually convenient time. Resp-^ctfully submitted, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /C77*l Tom Kellogg I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Thomas P. Kellogg, P.E. Date: Decembers. 1999 Reg. No. 26917 EAST LONG LAKE AREA SANITARY SEWER 10C0 Sc5t« ^Bonestroo ORONO, MINNESOTA LOCATION PLAN FIGURE 1 Rosene Andsrlik & |\|| Associates EnglnM's S ArchitBcts \ 13399:05\CAD\0WC\ 13999 »05Rl .D.VG COMSf. 139991 Co 11/30/99 - -■«> GRAVITY SEWER OPTION 13999105\CAD\0WG\ 13999105ELLR DWG COMM. 13999.05 11/30/99 t 39931 C5\CA0\DWG\ 13999 1 OSELLR.C'AG COMM. 13999105 n/30/99 EAST LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER • GRAVITY OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE EjST. QUANflTY EST;^ COSTi 8* PVC sanitary sewer Standard 4’ dia. MH MH overdepth a* X 4" wye 4* PVC service pipe Improved pipe foundation Televise sewer Mechanical trench compaction Submersible pump lift station 4" HOPE forcemain Connect to existing manhole 1 1/2" HOPE forcemain Residential grinder station Mobilization Bituminous surface removal Common excavation Geotextile fabric Class 5 aggregate base, 100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41 bituminous wear course Bituminous material for tack coat Repair driveways Sod with 4" topsoil Meter manhole Long Lake sewer connection charge LF EA LF EA LF LF LF LF EA LF EA LF EA LS SY CY SY TN TN TN GL EA SY EA EA 28.00 1.500.00 100.00 75.00 20.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 55,000.00 20.00 350.00 7.00 7.500.00 5,000.00 2.00 6.00 1.50 10.00 32.00 35.00 1.50 750.00 2.50 5,000.00 1.700.00 1,400 5 10 11 370 3,000 1,400 2,780 1 1,050 1 200 1 1 3,750 1,250 3,750 2,300 450 340 200 10 1,400 1 11 $39,200 7,500 1,000 825 7.400 3.000 1.400 2,780 55.000 21.000 350 1,400 7,500 5.000 7,500 7,500 5,625 23,000 14,400 11,900 300 7.500 3.500 5,000 18,700 Estimated Construction Cost •<-5% Contingencies -1-20% Legal, Engineering and Administration •f5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost $258,280 12,914 $271,194 54,239 $325,433 16,272 $341,704 12/8/99 East Long Lake Gravity Sewer File No. 139-99-105 EAST LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION ITEM UNIT UNIT. -EST. PRICE QUANTrry 1 1/2' HOPE service pipe 1 1/2* HOPE service pipe-directional bore 2* HOPE forcemain-direclional bore HOPE service tee Curb stop Air release or cleanout manhole Repair driveways Bituminous street patching Connect to existing manhole Erosion control fence Mobilization Sod with 4* topsoil Trees Long Lake sewer connection charge Residential grinder station Meter manhole LF LF LF EA EA EA EA SY EA LF LS SY EA EA EA EA 10.00 20.00 20.00 50.00 200.00 2.500.00 750.00 10.00 2,000.00 2.50 5,000.00 2.50 400.00 1.700.00 4.500.00 5,000.00 Estimated Constmction Cost •l■5% Contingencies 4-20% Legal, Engineering and Administration 4-5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost 100 160 1,700 11 11 3 8 350 1 200 1 4,000 10 11 11 1 EST.] COST! $1,000 3.200 34.000 550 2.200 7.500 6,000 3.500 2,000 500 5.000 10.000 4.000 18,700 49,500 5.000 $152,650 7,633 $160,283 32,057 $192,339 9,617 $201,956 12/8/99 East Long Lake Pressure Sewer File No. 139-99-105 Public A ttendance Meetlng Date Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 • • r.';r; A ^ 1999 O. ,. OnOMO Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to; City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Name: Uo i s sJru r) Address: G . ktnc) Comments: X 6 * • # Phojjgff" i CA6i or. •PrrlOcJgcl 4 Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to: City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Name: ^ Address: '^6^" ' ^ • Comments: LO& (2pi0Cr^ P^tevJgrCT f^cO-(li /2/> IL^i Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to: City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Name: Address: ySO E- Comments: /i./j -fiji ^ -""ij ThAi [kyrrHy'/r^ '^LiOn lj^<fh £o-i M______________ I Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 OcC f) 5 |ccc C: I V Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting/or mail to: City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Name: Address: LoKu Contments: COUNCIL MEETING D^c 1 3 1999REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITYOFOaONO DATE: December 10,1999 ITEM NO: /<$L Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Highway 12 Adopted Preliminary Layout Plan On September 7, 1999, Mn/DOT submitted its Trunk Highway 12 Adopted Layout Plan to the affected cities for review and approval. The cities have 120 days from the date of receipt of the layout plan to approve or disapprove the layout. The Adopted Layout Plan reflects the key objectives of the City related specifically to the preliminary layout. There are a number of additional objectives the City will pursue during the final design phase. A resolution and letter approving the Trunk Highway 12 Adopted Layout Plan and restating the City ’s objectives regarding both the preliminary layout and the final design are attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the Trunk Highway 12 Adopted Preliminary Layout Plan. 1 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 ADOPTED PRELIMINARY LAYOUT PLAN WHEREAS, the Orono City Council approved the corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 on October 14,1996; and WHEREAS, since that time the Cities of Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata have been working with Mn/DOT on the development of a preliminary layout for the new highway and relocated railroad; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT provided initial layout pla o the Cities on October 28,1998 for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the City provided comments in r ter dated March 23, 1999; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has revised the prel' nary layout to reflect Orono’s key objectives specifically related to the preliminary layout; ar WHEREAS, Mn/DOT provided the O with the final preliminary layout on September 7,1999; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT held a public 1 ring/open house on November 17,1999 to obtain comments regarding the preliminary layout; s i WHEREAS, the prel iminaiy' layout equately addresses the concerns and objectives of the City related specifically to the preliminaiy I out; and WHEREAS, the City has a numb of additional objectives related to the Highway 12 project that are not a part of the preliminary pproval, but will be addressed during the final design phase; and WHEREAS, the City’s approvr >fthe preliminary layout is based on a continuation of a positive working relationship with Mn/T T that ensures ongoing open communication and 1 age 1 of2 flexibility in considering the input of the City regarding design options throughout the final design process; and WHEREAS, the attached letter sets out the City's objectives specifically related to the preliminary layout, the objectives to be addressed during the final design phase, comments to guide Mn/DOT during the final design phase, and principles to guide the City and Mn/DOT through the final design process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby approve the Trunk Highway 12 Adopted Layout Plan as submitted by Mn/DOT dated September 7,1999, with the comments regarding the preliminaiy design and the final design process in the attached letter. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this n* day of December, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of2 .1 December 7,1999 Mr. Tom O’Keefe, P.E. Mn/DOT Metro Division Waters Edge Building 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 Dear Mr. O’Keefe: On October 14, 1996, the City of Orono approved the corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 without restrictions. By this letter and the attached resolution, the City approves the preliminary layout for the upgrade of Highway 12, with the following comments. Objectives Reflected in the Preliminary Design The key objectives of the City, which are now reflected as elements of the preliminary design, are as follows: 1. 3. Ensure the design and operation of the County Road 6/Highway 12 interchange, and of new Highway 12 in the area of this interchange, are adequate to provide free flow of traffic on both County Road 6 and Highway 12 well into the future. The key traffic movements here are westbound new Highway 12 using the loop to westbound County Road 6, and eastbound County Road 6 traffic using the entrance ramp to eastbound new Highway 12. In addition to the importance of this interchange operating effectively itself, the free flow of traffic on new Highway 12 and County Road 6 is extremely important to the effective future operation of the entire east/west transportation system in Orono. The County Road 6/Highw ay 12 interchange bridge is designed at a w idth sufficient to accommodate four through lanes in the future. The design includes a median barrier between the eastbound and westbound lanes of new Highway 12 in the area of the County Road 6/Highway 12 interchange. Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December 7,1999 Page 2 4. 5. The design of the Wayzata Boulevard/Highway 12 interchange has been maintained as the design that works best operationally in terms of the safe and efficient movement of traffic. The design provides no ingress or egress to new Highway 12 anywhere along the corridor, except at the County Road 6 and Wayzata Boulevard interchange areas. Objectives to be Addressed During the Final Design Phase A number of the City’s objectives are not a part of the preliminary design approval, but rather will be addressed during the final design phase. The objectives to be addressed during the final design phase are as follows: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Facilitate the free flow of traffic on what will be old Highway 12 by eliminating the semaphore at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and old Highway 12. Preserve Orono Orchard Road as a local roadway serving local trips. Limit lighting along the corridor to the bridge and interchange areas only to minimize spillover of light from the corridor to adjacent properties. Minimize the noise and vibration impacts of the new roadway and the relocated railroad. The Water Resources Plan for the Highway 12 project includes an option to divert some stormwater flows to a stormwater pond in the location of the Long Lake sewer pond rather than directing all flows into Long Lake. Any diversion of stormwater must be limited to an amount that will not cause flooding problems downstream along Long Lake Creek, will not result in a reduction in the quality of w ater flowing out of the pond and into Long Lake Creek, and will not reduce the water level or water quality of Long Lake. Coordinate the pedestrian bike trail system being constructed along the Highway 12 corridor in Long Lake with the Orono trail system. Further discuss the real merits of a ramp meter on the eastbound ramp of the County Road 6 and Highway 12 interchange. Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December 7, 1999 Page 3 Comments to Guide Mn/DOT Purine the Final Design Phase 1. Sewer trunk line replacement. As part of the new Highway 12 construction project, Mn/DOT will remove and replace City and MCES sewer lines that are currently located in the railroad right-of-way. These lines will be replaced by a line or lines that meet the current and projected sewer capacity needs of both Orono and Long Lake. 2. Stormwater management. The City of Long Lake has requested Mn/DOT to study options for diverting a portion of the stormwater runoff to a pond adjacent to the sewer property in Long Lake, rather than directing the flow into Long Lake. The purpose is to reduce the potential for flooding, and to improve the water qualit> of Long Lake. At the March 3, 1999 Highway 12 Design Review Committee meeting, Nancy Yew, Mn/DOT Water Resources staff, acknowledged there was an “unknown” risk of deteriorated water quality coming out of the pond adjacent to the sewer property in Long Lake if the proposed stormwater diversion plan was adopted. Nancy indicated a more comprehensive study would have to be done to better quantify this risk. Although the City is supportive of improving the water quality of Long Lake, it is not supportive of doing so at the expense of the viability of wetlands along Long Lake Creek and of the long-term water quality of Lake Minnetonka. It is imperative that prior to any decision regarding the diversion option, substantial analysis is conducted to determine water qualify’ impacts. 3. Corridor lighting. Mn/DOT has indicated lighting along the corridor will be limited to the bridge and interchange areas. Lighting will be added along the corridor only if an accident problem develops that is specifically caused by. and can be ameliorated by, the addition of lighting. If this situation occurs, Mn/DOT will work with the affected cities to develop a lighting plan that addresses the accident problem while minimizing the amount and height of lighting. It is important that Mn/DOT is flexible in its lighting design so that Mn/DOT can work with the cities to minimize the height of the lighting, so that the spillover of light from the roadway to adjacent properties is minimized. 4. Vibration and noise mitigation. The City has contracted with HDR Engineering to conduct a study of noise and vibration impacts along the highway/railroad corridor. It is important that Mn/DOT make optimal Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December 7,1999 Page 4 efforts to minimize the noise and vibration impacts along the corridor. This will include working with the cities and propert>' owners along the corridor to provide optimal noise and vibration mitigation. It is important that Mn/DOT continue to work wilh the City toward finding a way to provide berming along the corridor west of Old Crystal Bay Road. Both Mn/DOT and the property owners west of Old Crystal Bay Road would benefit from the provision of berming. The property owners would gain some measure of mitigation of the noise and visual impacts of the road and railroad. Mn/DOT would gain a cost-effective method of disposing of a substantial portion of the soil from the excavation needed along the corridor, as well as a substantial amount of goodwill. Mn/DOT has indicated the obstacle to the berming is the need to acquire additional right-of-way for the berms. If the City, the property owners, and Mn/DOT continue to work toward a solution, with a focus on the benefits to all parties, we should be able to find a solution that is acceptable to all parties. In recent discussions with the residents south of the Orono Industrial District, the residents I dve requested that, rather than constructing a retaining wall on the north side of the corridor ' the area of the Orono Industrial District, a vegetated slope similar to the one on the south side of the corridor be used on the north side. This would minimize the reflection of noise from the corridor back to the residential neighborhoods on the south side of the corridor. It would also provide a more natural aesthetic character, which would be more 'imilar to the current character of the corridor. 5. Residents along the corridor, whose property will be partially or totally taken for right-of- way purposes, have been trapped in their homes for several years. It is important the decision process regarding partial versus total acquisitions be accelerated; and that acquisitions, particularly hardship acquisitions, be completed as quickly as possible. The City and the residents along the corridor need to know as soon as possible how the right-of-way process will work, who from Mn/DOT will be working with residents, and what the timing of the process will be. Principles to Guide the City of Orono and Mn/DOT throuuh the Final Design Process 1.The City of Orono, including the Mayor, City Council, Design Review Committee and staff, have always believed the “right” approach was to be straightforward, participative and “big picture' orienied. I he City has not tied its approval of the preliminary layout to the resolution of issues that are not directly related to the preliminary layout. The City is confident that Mn/DOT will continue to work as a partner with the City to resolve issues at the proper stage in the project process. It is important this approach guide the interaction between the cities and Mn/DOT. Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December?, 1999 Page 5 2. Ongoing communication will be maintained between Mn/DOT and the City of Orono. 3. 4. Design details developed by Mn/DOT will remain flexible to enable consideration of changes based on input from the City of Orono. To address City concerns regarding specific design issues, Mn/DOT will develop design options, or will provide an opportunity for Orono to develop design options. The design options will be reviewed and considered as part of the process of determining the final design. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator tL or/13/1994 11:48 612-473-6059 FLINT j ’/'Mfd kUdm page 02 2 -T A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 ADOPTED PRELIMINARY LAYOUT PLAN WHEREAS, the Orono City Council approved the corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 on October 14,1996, and WHEREAS, since that time the Cities of Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata have been working with Mn/DOT on the development of a preliminary layout for the new highway and relocate railroad; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT provided irJtial layout plans to the Cities on October 28,1998 for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the City provided comments in a letter dated March 23, 1999; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has revised the preliminary layout to reflecTOrono ’s key objectives specifically related to the preliminary layout; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT provided the City with the final preliminary' layout on September 7, 1999; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT held a public hearing/open house on November 17,1999 to obtain comments regarding the preliminary layout; and WHEREAS, the preliminary layout adequately addresses the concerns and objectives City related specifically to the pajiminary layout; and WHERB^, the City has a mlmber of additional objectives related to the Highway 12 project that are notU part of the preliminary approval, but will be addressed during the final design phase; and WHEREAS, the City ’s approval of the preliminary layout is based on a continuation of a positive working relationship with MiVDOT that ensures ongoing open communication and Page 1 of 2 of the 01V13/1994 11:48 612-473-6059 FLINT PAGE 0 3 December 7,1999 Mr. Tom O’Keefe, P.E. Mn/DOT Metro Division Watcis Edge Building 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 Dear Mr. O’Keefe: On October 14 199^cihc City of Orono approved the corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 and U,e ;Lh«d resolution, the City approves the prehmmao’ Ti^^orthe" upgrade of Highway 12, with the followng comments. The key objectives of the City, which are now reflected as elements of the preliminary design, arc as follows: 1 EnsurethedesignandoperationoftheCouotyRoadd/Highway 12 inlerehmge, and of Highwa“.2 in the are. of this inte.change, a« adec,ua« Jo prov^e free flow of traffic on both County Road 6 and Highway 12 well into the future. The ke uaffle movements here are westbound new Highway 12 using the loop to County Road 6. and eastbound County Road 6 traffic using the entrance ramp to casibLid new Highway 12. In addition to the iraportMce of tntwh“ge operating effectively itself, the free flow of traffic on new Highway Road 6 is extramely important to the effective fu.ure operation of the entire east/wes transportation system in Orono. 2. The County Road 6/Highway 12 interchange bridge is designed at a width sufficient to accommodate four through lanes in the fliturc. 3 The design includes a median barrier between the eastbound and westbound lanes of new Highway 12 in the area of the County Road 6/Highway 12 interchange. 01V13/1994 11:43 612-473-6053 "LDi4:PAGE 05 Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December?, 1999 Page 2 4. 5. •me desien oftbe WayzateBoulevard^ighway 12 interchange has been mai^ined as the design that works best operationally in terms ot the safe and efficien movement of traffic. The design provides'jfejS^s or egress to new Highway 12 anywhere along the corridor, except at the County Road 6 and Wayzata Boulevard interchange areas. Q^jectivci; he Addressed_During the Fin?>1 Design Phase A number of the City’s objectives are not a part of the PT"'; be addressed during the final design phase. The objectives to be addressed during the final design phase are as follows: 1.Facilitate the free flow of traffic on what will be old Highway 12 by eliminating the semaphore at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and old Highway I -. Preserve Orono Orchard Road as a local roadway see ing local trips. 3.Limit lighting along the conidor to the bridge and interchange areas only to minimize spillover of light from the corridor to adjacent properties. 4.Minimize the noise and vibration impacts of the new roadw-ay and the relocated railroad. 5. / along Long Lake Creek, will not result In a reduction in the quality ot water flowing out of the pond ond into Long Lake Creek, and will not reduce the water level or water quality of Long Lake \ 6. V 7. Coordinate the pedcstrian/blke trail system being constructed along the Highway 12 ’ corridot in Long Lake i^ih the Orono > Fftt'iifrWi’uts ti«'re"afmffi« if a rSfnp mete? on the e^tbound raifiip-^the County /“ Road 6 and Highway 12 interchange. 01713/1934 11:43 612-473-6059 FLINT PAGE 04 9 9^^^ \ Kdl Mr. Tom O’Keefe. P.E. December 7,1999 Page 4 i.kr'^ \ efforts to minimize the noise and vibration impacts along thi corridor. This will include working with the cities and property owners along the corridorjto provide optimal noise and vibration mitigation. It is important that Mn/DOT continue to work with the City toward finding a way to provide berming along the corridor west of Old Crystal Bay Road. Both MivDOT and the propeij.' owners west of Old Crystal Bay Road would benefit from the provision operrnmg. The property owners would gain some measure of mitigation of the noise and visual impacts ot the road and railroad. Mn/DOT would gain a cost-effective method of disposing of a substantial portion of the soil from the excavation needed along the corridor, as well as a substantial amount of goodwill. MivDOT has indicated the obstacle to the bcrmmg is the need to acquire additional right-of-way for the berms. If the City, the property owners, and Mn/DOT continue to work toward a solution, with a focus oii the benefits to all parties, we should be able to find a solution that is acceptable to all parties. In recent discussions witlt the residents south of the Orono Industrial District, the residents have requested that, rather than constructing a retaining wall on the north side of the corridor in the area of the Orono Industrial District, a vegetated slope similar to the one on the south side of the corridor be used on the north side. This would minimize the rcHcction of noise from the corridor back to the residential neighborhoods on the south side of the comdor. would also provide a more natural aesthetic character, which would be more similar to the current character of the corridor. 5. Residents along the corridor, whose propcrt>' will be partially or totally taken for nght-of- way purposes, have been trapped in their homes for several years. It is important the decision process regarding partial versus total acquisitions be accelerated; and that acquisitions, particularly hardship acquisitions, be completed as quickly as possible. JI^* it> an e residents along the corridor need to know as soon as possible how the nght-of-way will work, who from MnT>OT will be working with residents, and what llie timing of the process will be. Principles to Guide the Ciw of Orono and MtiT)OTlb^^»gb the Final Design PtOCgiS I. The Citv- of Orono, including the Mayor, City Council. Design Review Co^iittee and staff, have always believed the “right” approach was to be straightfor^vard, pi^icipativc and big picturc’oricntcd. The City has not tied its approval of the prehnimar>' layout to the resolution of issues that arc not directly related to the prelimmao layout. The City v confident that MnT)OT will continue to work as a partner with the City to resolve issues at the proper stage in the project process. It is i.-nportani this approach guide the interaction between the cities and Mn/DOT. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COI INCH MEETING DEC 1 3 W99 Cl IY Uh OhOixU DATE: December 9,1999 ITEM NO: /3 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Public Works Site Expansion - Eminent Domain Option - Resolution The City Council has authorized staff to pursue the acquisition of a 3.35 acre parcel adjacent to the City's Public Works facility for expansion of the Public Works site. The parcel is part of a 51 acre parcel platted as Outlot B, Willow Properties Addition. Staff has made an offer to the property owners based on an appraisal conducted by the County Assessor. A copy of the offer letter is attached. The property owners have rejected the City’s offer, and have indicated they are not interested in selling the property to the City. The property owners believe the City’s Public Works facility has a negative impact on the development potential of their property and are not interested in selling the property to the City, as they do not want the City to expand the Public Works use. They indicated the City should plan to move its Public Works facility to a site in the City’s Industrial District. The property owners also indicated they want to sell their whole 51 acre parcel to one developer, rather than selling small portions of the parcel, as they believe the parcel has a higher value if sold fully intact. Although the 3.35 acre parcel the City wants to purchase has limited development potential due to the configuration of the wetlands on the parcel, the propert>’ owners want to keep this parcel available for the mitigation of wetland filling that may be necessar>‘ to facilitate development on the larger portion of their property. Estimate of Property Value When the City was initially considering purchasing a portion of Outlot B, staff requested the County Assessor prepare an appraisal of a 12 acre parcel in the northwest comer of Outlot B. This 12 acre parcel included the 3.35 acre parcel the City is currently pursuing. The Assessor prepared an appraisal report (attached) that detemiined a value of $720,000 for the 12 acre parcel. Based on the more limited development potential of the 3.35 acre parcel versus the 12 acre parcel, the City’s offer was 5150,000. Public Works Site Expansion Options At the time the Council authorized staff to pursue the purchase of the 3.35 acre parcel, staff had identified the School District property to the north of the existing Public Works site as a potential /b •* I V . V A-^ / > i:.’*:.'K /*/. g»B8Hg^ GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Partway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-CQ66 October 19, 1999 Tom Reiersgord 4500 West 44th Street Mirmeapolis, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Reiersgord: This letter is an offer to purchase a 3.35 acre portion of the property at 2550 Wayzata Boulevard with PID number 33-118-23 11 0003. A map showing the specific piece of property to be acquired (outlined in yellow) is attached. The piece of property to be acquired has .89 acres of wetland area and 2.46 acres of dry area. The piece is totally separated from the larger parcel by wetlands on the east and south. In our recent discussion regarding the City's interest in this piece, you had indicated the property owners would prefer this piece to be a part of a comprehensive development plan for the entire property. Because this piece is isolated from the remainder of the property by a wetland buffer, the development of this piece would have, at most, a minor connection to the development of the larger parcel As the City has reviewed this piece in terms of wetlands, access, and building sites; the use of this site by the City appears to be a very good fit. The wetlands make the 3.35 acre piece very diflBcult to develop Access to the piece from anywhere other than the City's property, or from the School District property to the north, would require wetland filling. Due to the meandering of the wetlands, only two small areas of potential building sites are available. The number of units that could be built in these areas is severely limited, due to the narrowness of the area between the western property line and the wetlands, and the need to construct a road for access, and potentially a cul-de-sac. The development potential of the 3.35 acre piece is substantially limited in comparison to the other, less restricted, portions of the larger parcel which are much easier to develop. Based on the limited Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 Tom Reiersgord October 19,1999 Page 2 development potential, the City’s ofifer for the 3.35 acre piece is $150,000. This offer is subject to good title, as well as working out the terms of a purchase agreement. Please review this offer with the property owners at your earliest convenience, and contact me to discuss the terms of a purchase agreement. If you have any questions regarding the City's offer, please call me. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator RJM/lsv L________ A RESTRICTED USE APPRAISAL REPORT Vacant Land XXX Kelly Parkway Orono, MN PID #33-118-23-11-0003 (Part of) Prepared for: Ron Moorse The City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55356 By: Chris Bennett Senior Appraiser Appraisal Date August 16,1999 August 16,1999 Ron Moorse, Manager City of Orono 2750 Kelley ParkAvay Orono, MN 55356 Re: PID No. Part of 33-118-23-1 1-0CO3 (Westerly 12 acres adjacent to Orono Municipal Facility) Dear Mr. Moorse: I submit this restricted use appraisal report for your consideration for the above referenced parcel of land. I hereby certify that I have personally inspected the property located at: XXXX Kelley Parkway Orono Described as: The Westerly 584 feet of the North 895 feet of PID #33-1 18-23-11-0003 located in the NW ‘A of NE V* of Sec. 33-1 18-23. The purpose of this restricted use appraisal report is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property. The definition of market value and the other contents of this report comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Foundation. This report is subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions herein. As a restricted use appraisal, this report is limited in the detail of presentation. It has a user restriction that limits the reliance on this report to the person or persons for whom this report is intended. Anyone else using this report is an unintended user. It is my opinion that as of August 16, 1999. the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property- is $720,000. This conclusion is based on my personal inspection and review of the property, comparable sales and application of the appraisal process. Respectfully submitted. Chris Bennett, SAMA Senior Appraiser, Hennepin County- Assessor License #1071 • f SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS & CONCLUSIONS Location: Hennepin County PID #: Legal Description: Owner of Record: Appraisal Process: Appraisal Function: Land Size: Zoning: Improvements: Highest and Best Use: XXXX Kelly Parkway, Orono, Minnesota Part of 33-118-22-11-0003 (12 acres east of Municipal Facility) The Westerly 584 feet of the North 895 feet of PID #33-118-23-11-0003, located in the NWly Ya of NE V* of Section 33-118-23. Orono Plaza To estimate the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property as of August 16, 1999 To act as a valuation guide for a possible land purchase by the City of Orono. 12 Acres RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District (1 unit per 2 acres) The subject is unimproved vacant land. Medium Density Residential 4-6 units per acre) 1 GENERAL UNDERL\1NG ASSUMPTIONS The legal description used in this report is assumed to be correct. No survey of the property has been made by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. Sketches in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature affecting title to the property nor is an opinion of title rendered. The title is assumed to be good and merchantable. Information furnished by others is assumed to be true, correct and reliable. A reasonable effort has been made to verify such information; however, no responsibility for its accuracy is assumed by the appraiser. All mortgages, liens, encumbrances, leases, and servitudes have been disregarded unless so specified within the report. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and competent management. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover such factors. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined and considered in the appraisal report. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a non-conformity has been stated, defined and considered in the appraisal report. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national government or private entity' or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and impr.j f ments is within the bou.ndaries or property lines of the property described and that there vs .no encroachment or trespass unless noted with the report. "l^JL "uAr .1 k- ar* - «• ■»» 1 —- u.k ■rt--'A.«r . . GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS This is a Restricted Use Appraisal Report. Reliance on this report is limited to the intended user. This report cannot be understood properly without additional information that is contained in the appraiser ’s work file. The appraiser will not be required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made this appraisal, with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event, only with properly written qualification and only in its entirety. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land or improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof, shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales of any other medium without written cc nsent and approval of the appraiser. Nor shall the appraiser, firm, or professional organization of which the appraiser is a member be identified without written consent of the appraiser. CERTIFICATION The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this appraisal report: I have personally viewed the subject property described within the attached report. I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this appraisal report. I have no personal bias with respect to the subject property, nor is my compensation contingent upon the valuation concluded within the appraisal report. To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report, upon which the analyses, opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. This appraisal report sets forth all of the limiting cciditions affecting the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained in this report. The appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or approval of a loan. This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice of The Appraisal Foundation. No one other than the undersigned prepared the analyses, conclusions, and opinions concerning the real estate that are set forth in this appraisal report. % Chris Bennett, SAM.A Senior Appraiser, Hennepin County Assessor License #1071 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT: The subject property* is located adjacent to and east of Orono’s current municipal facilities. The property is basically level, approximately 12 acres in size and has a rectangular shape. It is currently part of a 51.25 acre parcel that extends between the eastern boundary of the Orono municipal property and Willow Drive. The topography is a mi.x of woods, meadow and wetland. A wetland delineation study has found approximately 2.6 acres of wetland mixed throughout the 12-acre property. The subject property is bordered on the west by the City facility, on the south by what will be Kelley Pk\vy and undeveloped commercial land, on the east by vacant land slated for residential development, and on the north by school district property. Access to the subject property is via Kelly Parkway, an asphalt surfaced frontage road for what is currently Hwy 12. Kelley Parkway is currently developed from Old Crystal Bay Road to the subject property and future plans are to extend Kelley Parkway to Willow Drive. Both municipal sewer and water are available for the subject property and would be requireo for any development. ZONING: The current zoning for the subject propertv' is RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential w hich allows a density of one house per 2 acres of high ground. With 9.4 acres of high ground on the subject properly, 4 single-family dwellings could be constructed. The current compressive plan has the subject property guided for medium density residential or 4 to 6 town home units per acre of high ground. The development density would have to be approved by the Orono City Council. HIGHEST AND BEST USE: After looking at sales of both 2 acre zoned development land and sales of higher density town home land, and giving consideration to the characteristics of the subject property, surrounding land uses, and potential development costs, it is my opinion that the highest and best use of the subject property is for town home development. COMPARABLE S.ALES: A search of the market produced no sales of land zoned or guided for town house development in the City of Orono. Recent sales of land zoned for town house development were available in the City of Plymouth. The four sales located in Plymouth that are most similar to the subject property were used in this appraisal. inicipal has a een the aphy is found subject Kelley idential oad for al Bay low After adjustments for sale date, physical differences, and local development costs. comparable sales ranged from $11,669 to $17,399 per unit. Comparable sales #2. #3, and #4, are most similar to the subject property and were given most weight. CONCLUSION; I have estimated that the 9.6 acres of high ground on the subject propert>' could reasonably be developed at a density of 5 units per acre or 48 total units. The actual number could end up higher or lower than my estimate. In my opinion, the market value of the subject property as of August 16,1999, is 515,000 per town home unit or $720,000. SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS :nsity density pcrty, liighest >Tnouth REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 Cl i Y Uh OHONU DATE: December 10,1999 ITEM NO : ''4 Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse #4 City Administrator’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Park Commission Reappointments The terms of three members of the Park Commission are expiring on December 31,1999. The three are Peter Welles, Susan Wilson and Sherokee Use. Peter Welles and Susan Wilson have indicated they do not wish to serve an additional term on the Commission. Staff will contact Sherokee Use to determine if she is willing to serve an additional term. With Council authorization, staff will place a news release in the local newspapers requesting candidates to ser\'e on the Park Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion authorizing staff to place a news release in the local newspapers requesting candidates to serve on the Park Commission. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 DATE: December 8,1999 CITY Oh O h 6(YO ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Council Liaison to Park Commission and Planning Commission Meetings in 2000 The following is a proposed schedule for Councilmember attendance at the monthly Park Commission and Planning Commission meetings during 2000. PARK COMMISSION PLANNING COMMSSION January 3,2000 Barbara Peterson February 7 Mayor Jabbour March 6 /a ,Richard Flint April 3 / /Charles Kelley May 1 ^ tA Robert Sansevere June S Barbara Peterson July 5 (Wednesday) Mayor Jabbour August 7 Richard Flint September 5 (Tuesday) Charles Kelley October 2 Robert Sansevere November 6 Barbara Peterson December 4 Mayor Jabbour January 19,2000 (Wednesday) Mayor Jabbour February 23 (Wednesday) t /p Richard Flint March 20 j j Charles Kelley April 17 1 1 Robert Sansevere May 15 j Barbara Peterson June 19 ^ 'Mayor Jabbour July 17 Richard Flint August 21 Charles Kelley September 18 Robert Sansevere October 16 Barbara Peterson November 20 Mayor Jabbour COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve schedule for Council attendance at the Park Commission and Planning Commission meetings during 2000. EETINQ 1999 r 8,1999 >HOnO ction: trator’s Meetings in nthly Park ION rere son /ere son id Planning REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 CITYOHOHOWO Date: November 29,1999 Item No.: j ^ Department Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Senior Planning Coorl Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Declaration of Local Jurisdiction re: ISTS - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - County Ordinance No. 19 Hennepin County has adopted an Ordinance for the Regulation of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). The County Board requires that each municipality that will retain its own jurisdiction over ISTS must submit a formal statement to that effect prior to 1-1-2000. It is clearly the City’s intent to continue local jurisdiction over ISTS. A number of facets of the County ordinance are worthy of note: - Individuals may construct their own ISTS serving their own dwelling, but it must have been designed by a State-licensed ISTS professional Existing systems with at least 2 feet of separation between the distribution medium and the seasonally saturated zone will not be required to upgrade if: - the system is not an Imminent Public Health Threat; - the system is not in Shoreland; - the system is not in a wellhead protection area; and - the system does not serve a food/beverage/lodging facility (Note: the above matches the new State regulations, with the exception that the State requires existing systems built after April 1, 1996 to have 3' of separation) - Failing systems shall be upgraded within 3 years, and County may grant a 2-year extension. Systems that are considered as posing an imminent threat to public health or safety must be upgraded in 10 months. Separation distance to a Type 3,4, 5 or 6 wetland is 50' (our standard is 75') Alternative and experimental systems are only allowed where a standard system cannot be used Warrantied systems are prohibited On-Site Jurisdiction November 29,1999 Page 2 Performance systems are not allowed, as the County Ordinance does not specifically adopt section 7080.0179 On Site Systems Manager Chris Pence is currently drafting proposed City code revisions which will be submitted to the Council for review and adoption this winter, in order that our ordinances address all the recent changes in State regulations. It is staffs current imderstanding that the City codes must be no less restrictive than State and Countv regulations. One potential impact is that Orono may have to require nonconforming system replacement on a 3-year timeframe rather than the current 7- 10 year timeframe. Staff is investigating the options on this. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution indicating to Hennepin County that Orono will retain local jurisdiction over ISTS. 1 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THE CITY OF ORONO WILL RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM (ISTS) REGULATION WHEREAS, the City of Orono has adopted regulations for the design, location, construction, use and maintenance of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS); and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has an established permitting and inspection program for ISTS management; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has adopted certain sections of MPCA Rules Chapter 7080 and is in the process of updating City codes to address recent Rule changes within Chapter 7080; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has adopted ordinances regulating ISTS in those areas of the County where local municipal jurisdiction of ISTS is lacking; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has requested formal indication from the City that Orono intends to retain jurisdiction over ISTS within the corporate boundaries of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, that the City of Orono will retain responsibility for and jurisdiction over ISTS within the corporate boundaries of the City, and will not abandon such jurisdiction unless at least one year notice is given to the County. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this n'** day of December, 1999. Attest: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Hennepin County An E(]uai Opporamity Employer “» -»•« ♦. —• « November 19, 1999 •■*•; V ^ 19oq CityofOrono . v.. j.iCi'io Linda Vee, City Clerk PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Vee: Thank you for your response to the previous survey indicating that your city will be retaining responsibility for Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) regulation, it was very helpful for planning purposes. The Hennepin County Board has adopted Ordinance Number 19 regulating ISTS. Enclosed please find a copy of the Ordinance, which will be effective on January 1, 2000. At this point we need a statement of official action from your city council or authorized official indicating that your will be responsible for ISTS regulation. We encourage you to review the Hennepin County Ordinance Number 19, Individual Sewage Treatment System Standards and submit your updated ordinance to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Should you change your disposition of ISTS regulation in the fiiture, please refer to subdivision 4 of the ordinance. Sincere. , C- '"V:, ^^ Susan Palchick, Ph.D., MPH Supervisor Enclosures Cc: Ronald Moorsc, Administrator CommunitY Health Department EpidemioIog>- and Environmental Health 1011 South First Street, Suite 215 Hopk ins, MN 55543 -9413 Epidemiology (612) 930-2729 Environmental Health (612) 930-2770 FAX:(61 2) 930-2782 RtcycUJ ' \ • • * . . *^ . • . » ’... ,p- . .f.'- i ■•iv-.- ;• V *:• 'ViV ^ •. -i'• • • • •, V. --V cr i"'' • •• ■ ■' ■ . ^‘"y,■•.• •• . ^ • VC '"•••* •■• ■■ ■■• •■■ •••• • . <y • ‘ ’ -• V;« • :x; •. • ^ v- 4 Z. . * ;• v * ‘•. '4 V- ' \ ‘ • <: " * . .• • ' * • • v.- • • . .. . ♦ • • • ‘V < . ^4 . .?•.•. r - • J ^ •■ » ' • • *• . H It i . .- .• • . •• ' -V, • ■ •- ■ •• • . vJ'Y •'* • • . ■• *■ — ^ 11 • . v; •. ** • • • *■ ■ • • ■ .•“ •, ■* 4 •> i ;•: • *- • • ■■. ■ =;'r -M.. .•■ -r ".•,■• • . . • >. •. t- r,. ..S .. • ■ - T^- ■• . • .V - ... •. • •• • M • *. •;*•• v;.,u; • . »• •• * ■■ •>/ S-. * ■ v: . •Vr; U ‘ V*.•f-. V iiv j -n*. ’• V* - - — • •-• 4 Tabic of Contents SUBDIVISION 1: Guncial Provisions ...................I SUBDIVISION 2: Definitions SUBDIVISION 3:Standards Adopted by Reference................. SUBDIVISION 4: Jurisdiction !•••••••••••••••••••••••••** SUBDIVISION 5: Administrative by the Health Authority SUBDIVISON 6: Pcmiitting......••••••••••••••••••••••••••* SUBDIVISON 7: Construction Inspections ••••••••• SUBDIVISION 8: Existing Systems .••••«••••••••••••••• SUBDIVISION 9:Violations ......................••••••• SUBDIVISION 10: Additional Standards for Health and Environmental Protcetton *•♦•.••►••••••••••••••••••••••••• 19 SUBDIVISION II: Enforcement ............................21 SUBDIVISION 12: Fees........................................21 SUBDIVISION 13: Severability.............................22 I ORDINANCE No. 19 INDIVIDUAL SEWACF. TREATMirNT SYSTEMS STANn^Rp,<^ The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners does hereby adopt this Ordinance establishing county-wide standards for the regulation of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115.55 and Minn. Rules Chapter 7080. SUBDIVISION 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1.1 Purpose. This ordinance is enacted to provide minimum standards for the regulation of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) including: their proper location, design and constniction; their necessary modification and reconstruction; their operation, maintenance and repair for the purpose of protecting surface water and groundwater from contamination by human sewage and waterborne household and commercial wastes; the protection of the public’s health and safety; and the elimination and prevention of the development of public nuisances, pursuant to the authority granted under Minn. Stat. Chapters 115 and 145 A and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and as amended that may pertain to sewage and wastewater treatment. 1.2 Objectives. The principal objectives of this Ordinance arc as follows: 1.21 The protection of Hennepin County ’s lakes, rivers and streams, wetlands, and groundwater essential to the promotion of public health, safety, welfare, socioeconomic growth and development of the County in perpetuity. 1.22 The regulation of proper ISTS construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent the entry and migration of contaminants, thereby ensuring the non-degradation of surface water and groundwater. I 1.23 The establishment of minimum standards for ISTS placement, design, construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent contamination and, if contamination is discovered, the identification and control of Its consequences and the abatement of its source and migration. 1.24 The appropriate v '.\ izruion of privy vaults and other non-water carried ISTS. 1.25 The prevention and control of water­ borne disease, lake degradation, ■ groundwater related hazards, and public nuisance conditions through technical assistance and education, plan reviews, inspections, ISTS surveys and complaint investigation. SUBDIVISION 2: DEFINITIONS. 2.1 Health Aiitlioritj-. The Hennepin County Community Health Department and its designated agent who shall be a qualified employee or licensee. 2.2 Owner, i f*?: fee owner(s) and, if applicol 'ic, the contract-for-deed purchaser. Ownership interests shall be determined by reference to the records of Hennepin County. The owner of each lot upon served by an ISTS is responsible for the lawful operation and maintenance of each ISTS. m m SUBDIVISION 3: STANDARDS ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. This Ordinance hereby adopts by reference Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, sections 7080.0020, 7080.0060, 7080.0065, 7080.0110, 7080.0120, 7080.0125, 7080.0130, 7080.0150, 7080.0160, 7080.0170, 7080.0175, 7080.0176, and 7080.0190 being the sections containing the technical standards and criteria contained in the “Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Program ”. SUBDIVISION 4: JURISDICTION. Municipalities. Municipalities in Hennepin County that elect to regulate Individual Sewage Treatment Systems pursuant to Minn. Rules Chapter 7080.0300 - 0305 shall: A.Provide verification to the Health I Authority of its intention to assume or retain jurisdiction of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems by submitting a resolution of the City Council or authorized governmental official to that effect prior to January 1, 1999 or within 90 days of County adoption, whichever comes later. 4 B. C. SUBDIVISIG THE HEAL! 5.1 The Mej followir E. ED rcnce ns d ng the ficd in ;tems inepin I 0 B. C. Provide timely notification to the Health Authority of its intent to assume or abandon its jurisdiction but in no case provide less than one years’ notice of such action or at a time mutually acceptable to both parties. In the event of abandonment of jurisdiction, agree to cooperate with the Health Authority in the transfer of responsibility ineluding timely traiisier of all records maintained by the municipality. SUBDIVISION 5: ADMINISTRATION BY THE HEALTH AUTHORITY. 5.1 The Health Authority shall have the following duties and responsibilities: E. To review all applications for ISTS. To issue all required permits. To conduct construction inspections and to perform all ncccssaiy tests to determine its conformance with this Ordinance. To investigate complaints regarding ISTS. To perform compliance inspections and to issue Certificates of 5.2 F. G. H. I. Compliance or Notices of Noncompliance where appropriate. To issue Stop Work Orders and Notices of Violation pursuant to this Ordinance. To take complaints to the Municipal or County Attorney for violations of this Ordinance. To maintain proper records for ISTS including site evaluation records, design records including calculations and summaries for all system component sizings and as-builts, complaints on noncompliance, compliance inspections, site evaluations, applications and exhibits, variance requests, issued permits, Certificates of Compliance, and enforcement proceedings. To submit annual reports to the MFC A to demonstrate enforcement of this Ordinance per Chapter 7080.0310. Neither the issuance of permits. Certificates of Compliance nor Notices of Noncompliance as requested or issued shall be construed to represent a guarantee or warranty of the system’s operation or effectiveness. Such certificates signify that .Vi the SUBDIV pen the 6.2 Per be I A. r the system in question is or has been designed and installed in compliance or non-compliance with the provision of these standards and regulations. SUBDIVISION 6: PERMITTING. 6.1 Required I^ermits. A permit from the Health Authority is required before any ISTS in Hennepin County ’s jurisdiction is installed, replaced, altered, repaired or extended. Installation, replacement, alteration, repair, or extension of an ISTS shall not begin prior to the receipt of a permit from the Health Authority for each specific installation, replacement, alteration, repair or extension pursuant to this Ordinance. Such permits arc not transferable as to person or place. Such permits shall expire 12 months after date of issuance. Upon request of an inspector, permits shall be provided by the permitee at the time of inspection. 6.2 Permits Not Required. Permits sliall not be required for the following activities: A. Repair or replacement of pumps, floats or other electrical tleviccs of the pump. B. Repair or replacement of baffles in the septic tank. C. Installation or repair of inspection pipes and manhole covers. D. Repair or replacement of the line from the building to the septic tank. 6.4 Permit Application. All applications for an ISTS permit shall include the following information: A. Name and address of property owner. B. Property identification number. C. Legal description of the property. D. ISTS Designer Name, address, phone number and State ISTS License number; (or Health Authority qualified employee name and number). E. ISTS Installer name, address, phone number and ISTS License Number. . F. Site evaluation report on forms approved by the Health Authority. G. System design with full information including applicable construction information on forms approved by the Health Authority. If. The location of at least one designated additional soil treatment area that can support a standard soil 8 1. J. treatment system on lots created after January 23,1996. Any other information requested pertinent to the process. A certified statement from the person who conducted the work. 6.5 Individual^ Constructing Tlicir Own ISTS. A license is not required for an • individual who is constructing a system on land that is owned or leased by the individual and functions solely as a dwelling or seasonal dwelling for that individual. Tire ISTS shall be designed by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency licensed Designer I or II. 6.6 Application Review and Determination. If after consideration of the application for a permit, the Health Authority determines that the work proposed conforms to and complies with provision of this Ordinance, the Health Authority shall issue a written permit granting preliminaiy approval authorizing initiation of the work as proposed. If the Health Authority determines that the woik proposed will not conform to or comply with the provisions of this Ordinance, the Health Authority shall deny the permit application. The permit application may be revised or corrected and resubmitted to the Health Authority for reconsideration. 6.7 Variances. Variances to decrease the three feet of vertical separation required beneath the distribution medium and the saturated soil or bedrock must be approved by the MPCA as per the procedures contained in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0305 Subp. 3. Variances to wells and water supply lines require approval from the Minnesota Department of Health. Any other requests for a variance from this ordinance shall be requested in writing to the Health Authority on forms approved by the Health Authority. SUBDIVISION 7: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS. 7.1 Reqiiirciiiciits. Compliance inspections . shall be conducted by the Health Authority anytime an ISTS is installed, replaced, altered, repaired or extended. The installation and construction of the ISTS shall be in accordance with the permit requirements and application design. If any ISTS component is covered before being inspected by the Health Authority, it shall be uncovered if so ordered by the Health Authority. Proposals to alter the permitted construction shall be reviewed and the proposed change accepted by the Health Authority prior to construction. Inspections shall be conducted at least once during the construction of the ISTS to assure that the system has been constnicted per the submitted and approved design. I 7.2 Inspector. Compliance inspections for construction, replacement, alteration or repair work on ISTS shall be conducted by the Health Authority. 7.3 Request for Inspection. It shall be the duty of the permitcc to notify the Health Authority of the dale and time the inspection is requested at least 24 hours (excluding weekend days and holidays) preceding the requested inspection. If the permitcc provides proper notice as described above and the Health Authority docs not appear for an inspection within two hours after the time .scheduled, the pcrmilec may complete the installation and submit an As-built for the system. 7.4 Access to Premises and Records. Upon the rcquc.st of the Health Authority, the applicant, owner, pcrmilec or any other person shall allow access at any reasonable time to the affected premises as well as any related records, for the purposes of regulating and enforcing this Ordinance. If entry is refused, the Health Authority shall have the recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry. No person shall hinder or otherwise interfere with the Health Authority in the performance of their duties and responsibilities pursuant to the enforcement of this Ordinance. Refusal to allow reasonable access to the Health Authority shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense, whether or not any other specific violations are cited. 7.5 Stop Work Orders. Whenever any ISTS work is being done contrary to the provisions of this Ordinance, the Health Authority may order the work stopped by verbal or v'rittcn notice personally served upon the installer or the owner of the land. All installation and construction shall cease and desist until subsequent authorization to proceed is received from the Health Authority. 7.6 As-buiits. A.s-builts shall be submitted to the Health Authority within five (5) working days of completion of the work on r the ISTS on forms provided or approved by the Health Authority. The As-built shall include photographs of the system prior to covering and a certified statement that the work was installed in accordance with submitted design and permit conditions and that it was free from defects. If an As-built is not submitted, the Health Authority may require the uncovering of the system for inspection. 7.7 Inspection Reports. A Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall be prepared by the Health Authority following an inspection or review of As- builts submitted in accordance with Section 7.6. A Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall include a signed statement by the inspector identifying the type of ISTS inspected and whether the system is in compliance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0060. A copy of the Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall be provided to the property owner within 30 days of the compliance inspection and a copy kept on ‘ . with the Health Authority. 7.71 Certificates of Compliance issued by the Health Authority for new construction and replacement shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of the compliance inspection or As- built certification unless the Health Authority or licensed inspector identifies the system as an Imminent Public Health Threat. 7.72 Notices of Violation may be issued with Notices of Noncompliance when the Health Authority determines that new construction, replacement or repairs are not in compliance with this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 8; EXISTING SYSTEMS. 8.1 Requirements. The Health Authority shall require a compliance inspection of an existing system whenever: A. In designated Shoreland Management Areas, an application for any type of building or land use permits is made. B. If the Health Authority deems a compliance inspection may be necessary, including, but not limited to, the receipt of information of a potential ISTS failure. 8.2 8.3 C. An additional bedroom on the property is requested. If a request for an additional bedroom is received between November 1 and April 30, the governing municipality may issue a building permit immediately with the contingent requirement that a compliance inspection of the existing ISTS shall be completed by the following June 1. Inspector. Only the Health Authority or licensed Designer I or Inspector, shall conduct an inspection when a compliance inspection is reauired for an existing ISTS. Existing Systems in Compliance with the Two-foot Rule. An existing system shall be considered in eompliance with the technical standards of MN Rules 7080 and need not be upgraded if the following conditions exist: A. B. The system is not an Imminent Public Health Threat. The system has at least two feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the distribution medium and seasonally saturated soil as indicated by mottling or other indicators. 15 C. The system is not in a Shoreland Designated Area. D. The system is not in a wellhead protection area. E. The system is not serving a food/ beverage/lodging facility. 8.4 Inspection Reports. A copy of the Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance resulting from a compliance inspection shall be provided to the property owner and the Health Authority within 30 days of inspection. 8.41 Certificates of Compliance issued by a licensed ISTS Inspector for an existing system shall be valid for three (3) years from the date of the compliance inspection unless the Health Authority or licensed inspector identifies the system as an Imminent Public Health Threat. 8.42 A Notice of Noncompliance shall be issued in the following circumstances and the conditions noted in violation of this Ordinance shall be remedied as follows: A. An ISTS determined to be failing shall be upgraded, replaced, or repaired in accord with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0060, within three (3) years, or its use is discontinued. The Health Authority, at its discretion, may grant an extension of an additional two (2) years. B. An ISTS posing an imminent threat to public health or safety shall be upgraded, replaced or repaired within 10 months. The Health Authority will give consideration to weather conditions in determining compliance dates. If an ISTS is determined to be a public health nuisance by the Health Autliority, the Health Authority may order the owner of the ISTS to cease use immediately and not allow use of the ISTS until it is corrected in accordance with the recommendations of the Health Authority. SUBDIVISION 9: VIOLATIONS. Noncompliance with this Ordinance by an applicant, permitee, installer or other person, as determined by the Health Authority, shall constitute a violation. 9.2 Serving a Notice of Violation. The Health Authority shall serve in person or by mail a Notice of Violation upon any person determined to be not in compliance with this Ordinance. 9.3 Contents of a Notice of Violation. A Notice of Violation shall contain the following: A. A statement documenting the findings of fact determined through inspections, reinspection or investigation. B. A list of specific violation or violations of this Ordinance. C. The specific requirements for coirection or removal of the specified violation(s). D. A mandatory time schedule for correction, removal and compliance with tins Ordinance. 9.4 Notification of MPCA. The Health Authority shall in accordance with state law notify the MPCA of any inspection, installation, design, construction, alteration or repair of an ISTS by a lironsed person or any pumping by u licensed pumper done in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 10: ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HEALTH AND environmental PROTECTION. 10.1 Siting of an ISTS. Notwithstanding any state or federal requirements, the separation distance from an ISTS to a Type 3, 4, 5 or 6 wetland shall be no less than fifty (50) feet. 10.2 Alternative and Experimental Systems. 10.21 Alternative and experimental systems arc allowed only in areas where the Health Authority has determined that a standard system cannot be installed or is not the most suitable treatment. 10.22 Any required monitoring plan for an alternative ISTS is the responsibility of the ISTS Designer. The monitoring plan .shall provide information as to: A. B. C. The specific modification to a standard system. The type and parameters for monitoring which shall be conducted to assure that the change will protect public health and the environment, including the monitoring time period and the and the person responsible for conducting the monitoring and reporting. A mitigation plan detailing what will be done if the system fails to meet the expectations established by the monitoring plan requirements. 10.23 The results of the monitoring of an alternative ISTS shall be submitted in accordance with the approved monitoring plan to the Health Authority. 10.3 Warrantied Systems. Warrantied systems, as discussed in Minn. Stat., Chapter 115.55, subd. 8, arc prohibited. 10.4 Maintenance Report. The owner of an ISTS or an owner’s agent who measu»'es or removes accumulations in accord with Minn. Rules 7080.0 175B shall submit records to the Health Authority of all pumping activities and recording fees. SUBDIVISION 11: ENFORCEMENT. 11.1 Any person, firm, corporation or other entity who violates any of the provisions ol this Ordinance or who makes any false statement on a Certificate of Compliance, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or a fine or both, as defined by law. Each day in violation may constitute a separate violation. 11.2 In the event of a violation of this Ordinance, in addition to other remedies, the County or Municipal Attorney may institute appropriate actions or proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations. SUBDIVISION 12: FEES. The Hennepin County Board shall from time to time estab ­ lish fees for activities undertaken by the Health Authority pursuant to this Ordi­ nance. Fees shall be due and payable at a time and in a manner to be determined by the Health Authority. SUBDIVISION 13: SEVERABILITY. If a provision or application of this Ordinance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 14: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2000. Passed by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 28"‘ day of September, 1999. County of Hennepin State of Minnesota By: Chair. of(i|^ of County Commissioners Attest: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 CITY OF ORONO Date: November 29,1999 Item No.: j Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron/^^"^^ Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Formal Opening of North Arm Lane as a Public Road - Resolution The portion of North Arm Lane formerly owned by the Armstrong family has now been deeded to the City. A condition of the agreement leading to this acquisition was that the City would formally declare North Arm Lane as a public road. Additionally, the Hennepin County tax department requires a formal resolution from the City in order to remo\e this parcel from the cax rolls. Small portions of North Arm Lane as traveled and maintained, are located on two additional properties over which the City has only prescriptive easements. These two property owners have been presented with proposed easement documents and we are still hopeful of obtaining formal easements from them. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution declaring North Arm Lane open as a public road. A RESOLUTION DECLARING NORTH ARM LANE OPEN AS A PUBLIC ROAD WHEREAS* the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono as the local road authority has maintained that roadway known as North Arm Lane as a public road for a period of time in excess of 30 years; and WHEREAS, per Minnesota Statutes SS 160.05 Subd. 1, that portion of North Arm Lane that has not been formally dedicated to the public but which has been used and kept in repair and worked for at least 6 years by the City of Orono, is deemed as a public highway; and WHEREAS, North Arm Lane is located partially on lands dedicated to the public for road purposes in the record plats of North Arm Estates Fourth Addition, Markoe Addition, and North Arm Overlook; partially on lands never formally dedicated as public roadway; and partially on a 33' wide tax parcel to which the City has acquired fee title, such tax parcel being described as PINS #06-117-23 24 0003 and legally described cs: That part of the South 854.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5*’’ Principal Meridian. Hennepin County, Minnesota lying east of the West 280 feet thereof and lying west of the most westerly lines of the plats of Markoe Addition, North Arm Estates Fourth Addition and North Arm Estates, which line is extended in a northerly direction parallel to the West line of said Southeast Quarter to the North line of the South 854.5 feet thereof (hereinafter referred to as '‘the tax parcel ”); and WHEREAS, the City of Orono wishes to formalize the public road status of North Arm Lane. Page 1 of 2 8.Granting such credit is reasonable given the impact of this taking on the developabiiity of the property. Further, because the credit that would be granted for each newly created 5-acre building site would be approximately 1/4 acre or less, the new lots would have 95% of their area outside the easement, and this 5% "variance" has little impact on the future use of each 5-acre lot, as compared to the major impact if 1/4 acre of a 1 acre or 1/2 acre lot was in right- of-way. 9.The granting of this credit is unique to to this property because it involves the settlement of litigation in regards to a right-of-way condemnation, which is not the case in most other properties in this or other zoning districts in Orono. CONCLUSION, STATEMENT OF INTENT AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby declares its intent as follows: 1.The City Council intends to enter into a formal agreement with the Hannings and their heirs, successors and assigns, which agreement will incorporate the following: a.A future subdivision of the property undertaken while the 5-acre minimum lot size is applicable to the property, shall be granted dry buildable area credit for the dry buildable land taken through condemnation for County highway construction purposes. b.The dry-buildable area creditable toward a future lot shall be an amount equal to the dry-bui!dable area of taken right-of-way that directly abuts said future lot and that lies dircctlv between Co. Rd. 6 and said lot. The intent of this agreement is that the property ow ners w ill be in no better and no worse of a position for accomplishing a reasonable subdivision of their property than they were prior to the right-of-way taking. Page 3 of 4 3.Nothing in this agreement will purport to grant, nor commit to granting, any variances to the Orono Zoning Code, except that the agreement will establish that the City will as a stipulation of settlement agreement grant a variance to Section 10.02.34 to allow the use of area dedicated as public road right-of-way toward the S-acre minimum lot area requirement based on the findings noted above. 4.The agreement is predicated on settlement of the condemnation appeal action in a dollar amount acceptable to the City Council and Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13* day of December, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 4 of 4 j. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^UNCfL MPct,mq I 5 IVyy Date: ?!^einbfir 2,1999 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Gary Cheswick Chief of Police Item Description: Employment of Full-Time Police Officers Exhibits:None DISCUSSION Budgeting for the employment of two additional police officers in the 2000 budget had previously been approved. A police officer testing and subsequent hiring list was established in March, 1999. The top two candidates were current part-time Officers Jeff Johnson and Tony Wittke. A final interview was conducted showing the top two candidates were still Jeff Johnson and Tony Wittke, in that order. Both officers have proven to be productive, dependable employees whom get along well with co-workers. Both will make excellent full-time police officers for Orono. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Request appointment of Jeff Johnson and Tony Wittke to the full-time police officer positions effective January 1, 2000 at starting pay rate level of $14.41 per hour plus benefits. COUNCIL MEETING DEC I 3 1»99REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY Oh OhOnu Date: December 8,1999 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: GaryCheswick Chief of Police Item Description: Hiring of Full-Time Community Service Officer Exhibits:None DISCUSSION With Robyn Hoechst’s acceptance of a position with the Minneapolis Police Department, the full-time CSO position she held becomes available. An advertisement was placed in several newspapers serving the metropolitan area. Twelve applications were received with nine candidates interviewed for the position. Of these final applicants, Ronald Hendricks was selected. Ronald is currently employed at the Hilton Minneapolis as assistant director of security. After discussing the position with Mr. Hendricks, I feel he has the capability and desire to serve our community. CPU NCR. ACTION REQUESTED Request Council approve hiring of Ronald Hendricks as a full-time Community Service Officer at a pay rate of $10.69 per hour with full benefits. I f REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COf 7MCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 DATE: ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse /T4 City Administrator ’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Scheduling of Worlc Sessions To continue to move ahead with the update of the Comprehensive Plan, the Council needs to schedule additional work sessions. A work session is also needed to conduct the annual City Administrator performance review. Two potential work session dates in early January are Thursday mornings, the 6*** and 13*'*. Work sessions could also be scheduled prior to the Janueuy 10 and January 24 Council meetings. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select dates and times for upcoming work sessions. COUNCIL MEET" '1 DEC 1 3 CITY Ur Unv^iMU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; December 9, 1999 ITEM NO: ^ ^ Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Tom Kuehn "p^ i Title Finance Director Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Request to Establish Insurance Internal Service Fund Attachments: Resolution to Create Insurance Fund. Currently the City budgets for insurance costs within the various risk areas of the General Fund and the Water, Sewer and Golf Course enterprise funds. The City has generally experienced a low loss ratio through 1998, but has incurred higher than normal losses in 1999. We have recently reimbursed the LMCIT for a portion of legal defense costs related to the Woodhill Country Club road matter. The City's share was $10,597. In addition there are four other claims for which the City has paid deductibles totaling $3,116. In 1997 the City increased the deductible in the municipal liability coverage from $500 to $1,000 per occurrence which resulted in premium cost savings of $5,300. Staff reviews the policy premium levels each year to determine if a higher deductible is reasonable based on the additional premium savings vs. the additional potential cost in deductibles. The City has received unusually high dividends from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for both the municipal and worker compensation liability programs for several years, due to the City's experience rating and high investment eeunings from the LMCIT program. Since 1993 the City has received $180,340 in dividends from the municipal liability program. The net dividends from the worker compensation liability program total $40,007 since 1993. The dividends have been included in the miscellaneous revenues of the General Fund and are part of the undesignated fund balance. The dividends have decreased significantly over the last three years, from a high in 1996 of $36,513, to $17,756 in 1999. Based on the City's recent and on-going experience with worker's compensation and municipal liability claims, it is reasonable to assume that dividends will continue to decrease and may eventually be eliminated. Also the City's insurance costs will veiy likely increase significantly because of the recent claims. Staff believes this is an opportune time to establish an Internal Service Fund for insurance and related risk activities through a transfer from the General Fund. The purpose of tlie fund is to purchase all liability insurance, municipal package, umbrella, liquor, bonds, and worker compensation policies, and to pay for all claim deductibles and other reimbursements required under the policies. The Insurance Fund will generate revenues through a charge back to the various other city funds based on the amount budgeted within each department for that year, through future dividends deposited in the fund, and through investment earnings. There will be years in which the budgets of individual departments will be insufTicient to cover the actual cost of insurance due to higher than anticipated rate increases. The Insurance Fund will be able to absorb those differences as well as the deductible costs. Each year the results will be reviewed during the budget process to determine what adjustments are required for each participating fund. It is requested that Council authorize the City to establish an Internal Service Fund, effective January 1, 2000, to be identified as the Insurance Fund. The Insurance Fund is to be funded initially by a transfer from the General Fund in an amount equal to the 1999 premium total for all insurance, or $123,900. Adjustments are required in the 2000 budgets as follows; General Fund transfer out budget increase of $123,900; Insurance Fund transfer in budget increase in the amount of $123,900. The Insurance Fund also needs 2000 budgets established for the various insurance expenditure amounts and revenue amounts as follows: Expenditure Budaet Revenue Budget Liability Insurance $ 97,425 Worker Compensation 38.260 Premium Charges to Other Funds _______ $135,685 Totals $135.685 $135,685 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; (1) Adopt Resolution to establish Insurance Fund, an Internal Service Fund, as of January 1 ,2000; (2) Authorize operating transfer of $123,900 from the General Fund to the Insurance Fund, and amend the corresponding transfer in or out budget of each fund by a like amount, effective January 1,2000; (3) Establish the Insurance Fund 2000 budget for expenditures of $135,685, and for revenues of $135,685. A RESOLUTION TO CREATE THE INSURANCE FUND, AN INTERNAL SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, it is advantageous to centralize the provision of certain goods and services within the City in an internal service fund type, thereby providing a useful means of accounting for such centralized intragovemmental activities; and WHEREAS, the City has risk exposures common to activities of its various funds; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council, hereby authorizes the ;:'.eation of the Insurance Fund, an Internal Service Fund, to be effective January 1,200i,‘. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Fund provide initial funding to the Insurance Fund through an operating transfer of $123,900, effective January 1, 2000; and that any dividends received from the City's insurer be deposited in the Insurance Fund; and that the Insurance Fund participate in the Cii>’s pooled investment program; and that the Insurance Fund shall recover the annual insurance expense in amounts as budgeted in the various departments and funds of the Cit>‘. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 13,1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor I om\Ms>varesi .n .s( u REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING OEC 1 3 1999 CITY OF OHOl^O Date: December?, 1999 Item No: ^ 3 Department Approval: Gary Cheswiclcy^l^^ Chief of Police Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Item Description: Letter of Intent to Purchase - Three 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Cars Exhibits:None DISCUSSION I am requesting permission to notify Superior Ford of our intent to purchase three (3) 2000 Ford Crown Victoria squad cars. These three vehicles are budgeted for and are to replace three older cars; Squad 179 with mileage of 125,000 - - Squad 180 with 128,000 miles -- Squad 181 with 105,000 miles. (Mileage based on actual miles as of 12/7/99) Cost per car is $24,500, This request is due to the restrictive number of vehicles being built. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of letter to be sent to Superior Ford. ► REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING OfC 1 3 I999i Cl I y uh OhONO DATE: December 8,1999 ITEM NO Department Approver tj Name Tom —' Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 1999 We have requested a cost estimate from the audit firm of Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Company for performing the 1999 fiscal year audits. The estimated cost for the 1999 fiscal year audits, including the Minnesota legal compliance audit, and assistance with the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program, is $20,160, excluding direct expenj .. The actual cost for the 1998 audit was $19,200 plus $770 for direct expenses. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council appointment of the audit fum of Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. to perform the required audits for the 1999 fiscal year records at an estimated cost of $20,160, plus direct expenses. MS^MDM\ACDimt ^OUNCIi MEETINa OEC I j 199, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10,1999 ITEM NO: ^ ^ Department Approval: Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: 1999 Interfiind Transfers and Loan Payments In December, 1998 the Building Capital Outlay Fund transferred $341,000 to the 1998 Sewer Construction Fund to be used as a temporary loan to cover construction costs incurred until such time as bonds were sold. The bonds were sold in July, 1999. At this time the loan should be repaid in full. The amount due is $341,000 principal plus $11,530 interest from 12/31/98 through 7/31/99 at 6.0%, for a total due of $352,530. In December, 1998 the Building Capital Outlay Fund also transferred $475,000 to the Water Opera^ng Fund to be used as a long-term loan and repaid over 15 years at 5.5%. The loan was to provide partial funding for the Navarre water plant rehabilitation project. The repayment of the loan is scheduled to begin in 1999. The total scheduled payments for 1999 are $56,390. including principal payments of $31,660, and interest payments of $24,730. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of interfund loan payments to the Building Capital Outlay Fund from the 1998 Sewer Construction Fund of $352,530, and from the Water Operating Fund of $56,390. PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,____, seconded by., to approve the inter­ fund loan principal and interest payments to the Building Capital Outlay Fund from the 1998 Sewer Construction Fund of $352,530, and from the Water Operating Fund of $56,390, effective December 1, 1999. Ayes___, Nays___. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOl^OUNCIL MEETING DATlfi^BeJeib???, 1999 CITY OF ORONQ ITEM NO: ^ Department Approv^ 1/ « Name Tom Kuehn'^ Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Authorization to disburse City funds for claims received This month we have only one Council meeting, scheduled for Monday, December 13th. The second Council meeting, which falls on or near the Christmas holiday, has been can­ celled, in line with previous years practices. We will have the next scheduled Council meeting on Monday, January 10, 2000. We therefore are requesting authorization to do a normal claims processing for the canceled Council meeting. This practice has been done in December each year with the Council then formally approving the claims at the first meeting in January of the following year. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse City funds in payment of claims received for the December 27th Council meeting, which has been canceled, and that such paid claims be presented for formal approval at the January 10,2000 Council meeting. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 CITY OF OhOWO DATE: Decembers, 1999 ITEM NO:>1 Department Approval: y li Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Tom Kuehn City Administrator's Title Finance Director Report Item Description: Changes in Utility Billing Late Fee Policy An adjustment to the utility bills penalty rate and to the time period for penalty was omitted from the 2000 Fee Schedule Ordinance presented to Council at the November 22, 1999 council meeting. The current penalty rate is 15% and the current time period for payment of the utility bills before incurring the penalty is 45 days from the billing date, with all payments postmarked the due date as considered on time. The penalty is currently applied only to the current quarter bill. It is recommended that f penalty rate be reduced from 15% to 8% and be applied to the unpaid balance, nc ust the current quarter. It is also recommended that the date due from the billing e be reduced from 45 days to 30 days and that payments must be received by the due < . to be considered on time. The penalty rate of 8% is more in line with .lalty rates at most other municipalities, with most being in the 10% range. It is anti ated that the reduction in the penalty rate will not result in significantly lower penalt’ m total for those customers who habitually pay late or do not pay at all. However, f ihe customer who occasionally pays late, an 8% penalty is not so onerous and is mi . easier to accept. The 30 day payment time period will speed up the cash flow, is r .h more the norm in terms of the grace period at other municipalities, and may result a higher collection rate because the bill is less likely to be forgotten. COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST ): Motion to amend the penalty fo ’ ae payment of utility bills from - 15% after 45 days from the billing date (applied or to the current quarter) to - 8% after 30 days from the billing date (applied to the to unpaid balance); and to include this change in the ordinance adopting the City'; .-ee Schedule for 2000 and Summary Ordinance for publication. COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION g,jy Qp DATE: Decembers, 1999 ITEM NO; Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Cleric^ Administrator Reviewed:m Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Proposed 2000 Meeting Schedule Attachment: Proposed 2000 Orono Meeting Schedule On the attached schedule. Council meetings are scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month at 7:00 p.m. As in the past, only one Council meeting is scheduled in December. Planning Commission is scheduled to meet the 3rd Monday of the month at 6:30 p.m. January and February are the exceptions because of Monday holidays. In those months, the meetings will be on the third Wednesday. In past years, there has not been a meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled in December. Park Commission meetings are scheduled for the first Monday of the month at 7:15 p.m. Exceptions are July 4 and September 6, when the meetings are rescheduled for Wednesday, July 5 and Tuesday, September 5 because of the holidays. The City schedules eleven holidays throughout the year, which are indicated with an "X". Because July 4 falls on a Tuesday, staff is recommending that Monday, July 3 be designated as the floating holiday this year. Only ten holidays are shown on the 2000 calendar because Friday, December 31 is the official New Year’s Day holiday; however, it is considered one of the eleven scheduled holidays for 2000. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to amend/approve/table the 2000 Meeting Schedule. 2000 PRONG MEETING SCHEDULE - COUNCIL CHAMBERS KEY rn 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 2nd & 4tli Monday O 6:30 p.m. Planning Commission 3rd Monday A 7:15 p.m. Park Cuiiimissiun 1st Monday Other Event X OiTicial Holiday ♦PLANNING COMMISSION - May through October • 1st Tuesday is an alternate meeting date. Adopted: January S M T 2000 W T F S 1 5 6 7 8 13 14 15 20 21 22 27 28 29 2000 T W T F S 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 September S M T W 3 10 17 24 2000 T F S 1 2 6 7 8 9 13 1415 16 f9i20 21 22 23 26\27 28 29 30 \ rrimiiry Klfction February 2000 5 M T W T F S 6 A 8 9101^2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 if 22 ©24 25 26 27 M 29 June 2000 S M T W T F S 12 3 4 A 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 Iza 27 28 29 30 October 2000 S lyi T W T F S 3 4 5 6 7 1011 1213 14 17 18 1920 21 24 25 26 27 28 31 March S M 12 19 26 2000 T W T F S A 12 3 4 8 91011 ■■1415 1617 18 21122 2324 25 2329 3031 CauculDay July 2000 S M T W T F S 2 XXA 6 7 8 9 fi^ll 12 13 14 15 16 07! 18 19 20 21 22 23 M 25 26 27 28 29 30 W November 2000 S M T W T F S A 12 3 4 5 9«11 12h1 1415 1617 18 19^21 22 AX25 26^28129 30 ’ ^ I Ctciirral I'.lcctiun April 2000 S M T W T F S 2 A 4 5 6 7 8 90311 12 1314 15 16(018 19 20 21 22 230 25 26 27 28 29 August 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 1011 12 15 16 1718 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 31 December 2000 S M T W T F S A I 23 A 5 6 7 8 9 10nlj12 13 1415 16 17 W 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 ADDENDUM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 13, 1999 ITEM NO.: 2 ? Department Approval: Name Michael P. GafTron Title Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 1999 Marina Licenses: Windward Marina Genmar/Kings Cove Sailor’s World North Shore Marina ADDENDUM: LAKESIDE MARINA List of Exhibits A - Lakeside Marina 1999 Application B - Site Plan Lakeside Marina filed its 1999 license application on Friday, December 10 upon being advised that no license had been applied for. The late fee has been paid. The information in the December 9 staff memo regarding Lakeside Marina is still accurate. It should also be noted that Lakeside removed its old nonconforming underground gasoline tanks and had intended to replace them with an aboveground system during 1999. Specifically pursuant to Lakeside's intent, and in a spirit of cooperation with the Marinas as well as an acknowledgment that State and Federal regulations now strictly govern the design and use of aboveground storage so that the risks of fire and/or spills are minimized; the Council in April 1999 amended the fuel storage ordinances to allow abovegrotind tanks in the B-2 Zoning District. Lakeside has not, however, applied for a new tank permit, and locating an aboveground tank on the site may result in the need for setback or hardcover variance.^. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a 1999 Marina License for Lakeside Marina along with the other four Orono marinas as noted in the December 9 memo. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the issuance of 1999 Commercial Marina Licenses to Windward Marina, King's Cove Marina, Sailor's World Marina, North Shore Marina, and Lakeside Marina. License Year 1999 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina 12/16/98 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME StreetAddress_ Mailing Address /n,1cf/yvc, - 2. Marina Phone ^ (^CC> Office Phone OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Address____________________ Phone 3.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: t rv\ yV/V /O __________ List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: ____ dock attendants ____ repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. / List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: % 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Principal Uses ____ in-water slip rental ____ sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories ____ boat repair and servicing _____ on-land boat storage __ winter __summer ____ marine fuel sales ____ sale of bait and fishing tackle il Conditional Uses (Conditional Use Permit is Required^ ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit Accessory Uses head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop ____ clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental ____iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5. BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): open all year 6. List proposed hours of operation: dock access ^ Jo O C ^ service MARINA SECURITYis provided by: _______ CARETAKER living on site? lA-^ S_____ open during boating season only AM to PM AM to PM SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total Owned Boats Spaces Boats 7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) _ a. At dock slips ^ Page 2 of 5 Total Boats in Water ^77 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ____ _ b. Outside on Racks ____ a Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use c. 9. 10. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list;__________________) •Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer’s boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list;__________________) Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 11. Inside Building Outside Building Total Inside Building Outside Building Total 12. SUMMER PARKING a. b. c. d. e. Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) = Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] = Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a. 0.20 X (line 12e)spaces Page 3 of 5 i >CK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent Seasonal Pilings: Wood Decking: Wood Concrete Metal __ De-icing normally used Metal Other___ Other Flotation Method (if used): Foam LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Barrels A Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the followng business use license standards: Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. A. B. C. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 i L- Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, ail changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. j / CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. ^ A ^ ,1^. J 2. 3. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATI' 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $. Renewal Application @ $200.00 Late Fee (if not postmarked by January 31) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ JO/0 $ .^<0 REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, t’le City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PURI 1C USE ONI V UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCII.. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License applicatioi., and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and <j^de compliance inspections. Authorized Signature Title------- Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 City of Orono P.O. Box 6G Crystal Bay, NN 55323 (812)473-7357 12/13/99 C9:0fl:40 Custooer: COmEKCIflL KARI.VA-LAKESID LICENSE - OTHER BUS. 1 9 300.00 300.00 SUBTOTAL 300.00TAX0.00TOTAL SALE 300.00Check Received 300.00 CHANGE 0.00 aERKI 02 TRANEI 11422 .r •;••■;^ Sr/'..-. •. •- .‘5^ • * > • • •• • « ^ -|V% • \ I • Vv* • I • ii *. \ • '.A*/.* /?=•. - ■‘. . •.•;••.*• • *^^^^'^ •• ;•.••• \\J • \ . **. * JN^ */• / ^v.* $^y/ / •^ ’ha< 1/ ^ias.7••••;;«► • . .. •V-S ■•■:■ •. iv» ' •: ..•• •.* • !*--c* , •••• rtA o 00 1 2'6o"E 11 1 . / V 1 *. .• / 0*0 V**»* *•. .A’.-". ^’.-.*#- ^ N-. •% • 1 * v: 32^- \n:i• • •• / \ / / 0-W / ' / / 0 / / y / / • « •/?5. ' W . ■ • •. / S® S' - t / / .’• •• *• • • V« •'•*• * ■ • s*.5^1 . I ..' IV ^1.; !• / / / P. I .* 4 * ■• ' I j,?/. 1 * ..: f \ / / / / / ;: — I i2;OoJ_Sor5£^(r ^ . » •< - \ V.. O .Ir« • O , • .* ^ • • • ®* « • ' • • • n 'fc • % • !•* / § / / :■ 0 • • •• • . .r - j. >h'V*' N- • • . •• •':.Vt-.?}-; •.. • •; Vc' -•• ■ *. • • • • V. **,•• • • * . • s" • • ,.• .. * ................ 1. • • . . .*V- ♦V r*Tr*" .!•< t: -•• Mu »-V o 1. > 2 i. o•:^: A it .>» I I tjl ^ 5 'o» ' I ISJVJi >Iv*4:. Iy \ i - f ‘I • ••• i \i i :vc/) ^ •- •• . • •.t* • ■••• N ! • • • I • • . • ••• ••* 2 Vff^ 1 S’ ro . r^vi,Pr» •’-I 2:it ft IN> : o \. rx ^ i t Ctl • S / §\Ai m I •• 1 1% ?■r Ofto S87*52WE • • r 4 / ^O’OV rj»-. m .Vi., •,♦•• • • *v •* • C* .. VN U, t •.V i: • / / .»n / 1. / / ;•« / / '• / / • /Ps- . . g. ' . ■■ • •• 6 *1 / K“* \ 2.* ■ ’ • 1 / / / / / N •?• •:• 1 / . s /■ / t-nN: ■' » ••■ •■■••; ■■ iw • > . / NJ . • a •• . ft ■ / \ 1 ^0.00 S07*$e'00 ”E ~ • •»• • 5 •*C • ?: • ^ S‘K* *.• 01 • • t .* • • •* ••• .* '. • ••y •;..•}.. • • r* !.*, • ••*•*• I*. • . •.' •• •• ••;./ •• 0 / ^ r* / / y •: • -- --------• .• *•• *• .v.| •X^ ■■ ;• ••• • tt- .• I t • • « * ' • * * • • V II- • .• • * •. •• o‘/*. * . ••. . i'c. -:; , • * ^♦.2 •••.• CS'C' •:Vli.- *• V. • • • I -r :rr » I 3? (/) 1 ,g‘' •* • •* *1^ ** • '• • ^3 1»Y- •"•iiir:-’-* I ^•V IC.I %#» ^ c '* s-’T -)c jr^ v:^ p -U) fc. ■w ( Kt)/I? X.*A •J o rvA-..:, n;:? ;•:•• • A- ••/•.' O____ VV % «5?a *••..^.<r/. • ••..:.• .* • • ••< •v/v: i C *V • / • 7^1*** •.'s/jliiSf. f/. »• • ••. ’t'.V- .■ / •■!•• V**: / ;: •,3 i* • •• • M *• ••• ••. •• •• .•• '••W S'* ••': **i • • 4- ^ •• .J. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 DATE; ITEM NO.: / ^ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Descriplioo: 1999 Marina Licenses: Windward Marim Genmar/Kings Cove Sailor's World North Shore Marina List of Exhibits (For each Application) A - Application B - Site Plan Summary >y' 999 from only four of the five Orono marinas We ud not receive a hcense appi,cation from Lakeside Marina. Although staff normally ins^Be^J marina site in mid-season and the City has typically issued annual licenses shortly after the inspections, this year the inspections were not completed due to time constraints. As a result 1999 licensTye^.^ proposing to issue them now rather than wait until the next Fire Safety Inspections In 1999 the City cc-tracted for the services of a Fire Marshal who has to date inspected all the Sario“"Tl.e“m!fna^ (scheduled for December 1 4) for compliance with Smte Fire Code g tions. The mannas were found to be in varying degrees of compliance. Many of the mostly issues. Conditions of License Approval mimmum 1909 Marina Licenses December 9,1999 Page 2 2. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m, except as nece‘*'ary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4. The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site, 6. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Individual Marina Reviews A. Windward Marina Windward Marina has 40 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 78 on Browns Bay for a total of 118. The marina sells and services boats and equipment in the facility on the Tanager Lake side of Shoreline Drive. A gazebo/toilet building is provided on the Browns Bay side. The site includes 26 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side, and 47 stalls on the Tanager Lake side, a portion of which are located on the adjacent residential property in which the owners, Mr. and Mrs. Rivers, reside. The attached site plan was approved by the City via Resolution #2674 on August 14, 1989. The applicant has generally adhered to the seven minimum operation standards. Aspects of the operation which require ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the operation standards, include eliminating storage of marina equipment on the residential overflow parking area, maintaining parking spaces within the paved lot next to the building as opposed to filling it with boats for sale, and managing parking to minimize customer necessity of crossing County Road 15. Staff recommends approval of a 1999 license for Windward Marina. 1999 Marina Licenses December 9, 1999 Page 3 B. Genmar Industries/King's Cove - Orono Site Genmar/King's Cove provides 66 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 48 slips on Browns Bay of which 36 are rental and 12 are used for boats for sale. Facilities include 71 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side of County Road 15. This site underwent major renovation in 1997, including replacement of the old storage building with a smaller office and restroom facility, upgrade of landscaping, a slight increase in parking and a major expansion of the stormwater pond. No activities occurring at the site require a conditional use permit. Applicants are currently in compliance with the seven operational standards and the conditions of approval of the recent renovation approval resolution #3835. Staff had a brief discussion with King ’s Cove in 1999 regarding the potential relocation of slips devoted to sales use, but no changes have been requested. Staff recommends approval of a 1999 marina license for Genmar/King ’s Cove. C. Sailor's World Sailor's World operates a ship's store, boat club (CUP issued 1995), and rents slips, with a current dock capacity of 79 boats. This marina was reconstructed in the early 1990's, and the only outstanding work remaining to be done as of last year is landscaping. While it appears landscaping work has finally been completed, staff has not had a chance to do ? final inspection. The mobile storage building has apparently also been moved to a less visible location on the site, which appears to be a positive improvement but may require City approval. The owner is pursuing an upgrade of his signage which may also require Council approval. .Activities occurring on this site which require ongoing attention by the property owner in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include: managing parking facilities, including the use of the Minnetonka Art Center for overflow parking to avoid parking and traffic problems, keeping the storage of boats and other items out of the designated landscape areas, and keeping the site neat and orderly. Staff recommends approval of a 1999 marina license for Sailor’s World. 1999 Marina Licenses December 9,1999 Page 4 D. North Shore Marina The North Shore Marina operation includes 93 slips in the water (historically the City only allowed 86 slips, but LMCD allows 93) plus a dry stack storage unit with 72 slots (all of which LMCD licenses but only 20 of which Orono has historically allowed for lake use). The property also contains a service building, an office, a "club house" for slip users, and two dwellings, one of which is vacant and the other which is used as a caretaker unit. The site provides ample parking for customers in the summer and a large capacity for storage in the winter. The last two winters this site has been fully utilized for boat storage, and this winter it appears full again. Two activities on the site require a conditional use permit. These include the caretaker dwelling unit and on-demand public boat launching (dry stack operation). Staff has met with Mr. Anderson a number of times regarding the required CUP application. He has acknowledged that these two activities are ongoing absent the required conditional use permit, and has indicated his attorney has advised him to not apply. Both activities requiring a CUP have been ongoing for many years prior to the CUP requirement. Staff/City Attorney review of this issue has not made progress in 1999. E. Activities occurring on the site which require the property owner's ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include limiting storage of boat trailers and other equipment to those areas noted on the approved site plan (specifically keeping the area between the road and the dr\- stack units free of storage). The applicant has been issued permits for some minor landscaping work in this area, and his intent is to continue to beef-up the vegetative screening between the dry-stacks and the road. Staff recommends approval of a 1999 license for North Shore Marina. Lakeside Marina Lakeside Marina did not submit a 1999 license application. Lakeside Marina has 77 rental slips on Maxwell Bay. This is a full-service operation that includes a boat club, repair shop, ship's store, boat brokerage, charter boats berthed at the site and sometimes using it as a port- of-call, and to a limited extent on-demand launching of customer boats stored on site, as well as transient launching when space is available. Lakeside's 1 995,1 996,1 997 and 1998 license applications each indicated that all of the five activities requiring a CUP under the 1995 B-2 Code revisions, were or would be occurring on the site. An incomplete CUP application with S300 fee was submitted by Mr. Duim on May 31,1996. Staff has had numerous contacts with the marina operator since then detailing 1999 Marina Licenses December 9, 1999 Page 5 the necessary submittals to make the application complete. He has indicated his attorney has advised him to not make the CUP application. Those items which require ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the seven operational standards include managing parking in order to avoid congestion on the site, management of boat storage to avoid causing view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site, and limiting storage to those locations shown on the site 'Deration plan. Pursuant to complaints received from the adjacent property owner, and per Council ’s direction as a condition of 1998 license approval. Lakeside in late 1998 erected a screening fence along the east lot line. The fence has resulted in a significant reduction in encroachments into the adjoining property. The adjoining property owner in September 1999 expressed concerns about boats parked on land so close to the fence that boatowners working on them might discard debris onto the complainant’s site or even fall over the fence into the property. The complainant was advised that the City sees this as a minor issue compared to certain fire safety issues on which the City and Fire Marshal are currently concentrating at this site. Absent an application for the 1999 license, staff cannot recommend issuance of a license to Lakeside for 1999 at this time. General Marina Issues Each Orono marina has site constraints that limit the level of “reasonable ’* site activity. None of the marinas ever have been in compliance with the hardcover standards imposed by the zoning code, and even when redevelopment has been approved by the City, the amount of hardcover tolerated at the marinas has always far surpassed the hardcover limits imposed on residential development. Three of the five marinas have significantly redeveloped in the last decade, resulting in the City’s acceptance of a certain level of improvements which support varying levels of commercial activity for each site. The marinas provide necessary services to the Lake Minnetonka community, by providing a wide range of lake access opportunities, boat maintenance and repair services, and winter storage. While it can be argued that boat sales (and perhaps even boat storage and many maintenance/repair activities) are functions that don ’t strictly require a location on the water, one or more of these activities continue to be a significant part of the business at each of our marinas. While it may appear from time to time that the marinas are ‘overflowing ’ with activity, they have as a group generated very few complaints from the public or nearby landowners. Parking management on a day-to-day basis has been one of the City’s primary concerns w ith marinas through 1999 Marina Licenses December 9, 1999 Page 6 the years, with the dual intent of keeping the level of site use commensurate with the site capacity so there is no burden on adjoining landowners nor on the public roadways; while maintaining site accessibility for general use and emergency purposes. Ancillary activities that have occurred in the past at some marinas such as fishing contests, charter boat activity and various ‘special events ’ tend to create periods where the marinas outstrip their capacity and negatively impact the neighborhood. In general, the marinas tend to be busiest during either end of the season when boats are either being dropped in or hauled out, and on fair-weather weekends throughout the summer. A perhaps secondary issue for the City has been the burden on the lake itself as boats have become larger and faster, and the methods for providing lake access have become more innovative (dry­ stacking, boat clubs, etc.). However, in recent years the City has primarily focused on land-use issues and left the larger issue of lake use to the LMCD. Staff has pretty much left the marinas alone for the past few years, responding to complaints if and when they arise, but not really picking away at the little problems that we could find with each marina if we looked harder. In 1999 we have made progress toward greater fire code compliance. Council may wish to advise staff whether there are any specific concer.is that you wish staff to pursue with greater vigor. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of 1999 commercial marina licenses for Windward Marina, Genmar/King's Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marina. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by______, seconded by , to direct staff to issue 1999 commercial marina licenses to Windward Marina, Genmar/King's Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marina. Vote: _______ayes,_____nays. 1999 Marina Licenses December 9,1999 Page 6 the years, with the dual intent of keeping the level of site use commensurate with the site capacity so there is no burden on adjoining landowners nor on the public roadways; while maintaining site accessibility for general use and emergency purposes. Ancillary activities that have occurred in the past at some marinas such as fishing contests, charter boat activity and various 'special events ’ tend to create periods where the marinas outstrip their capacity and negatively impact the neighborhood. In general, the marinas tend to be busiest during either end of the season when boats are either being dropped in or hauled out, and on fair-weather weekends throughout the summer. A perhaps secondary issue for the City has been the burden on the lake itself as boats have become larger and faster, and the methods for providing lake access have become more innovative (dry­ stacking, boat clubs, etc.). However, in recent years the City has primarily focused on land-use issues and left the larger issue of lake use to the LMCD. Staff has pretty much left the marinas alone for the past few years, responding to complaints if and when they arise, but not really picking away at the little problems that we could find with each marina if we looked harder. In 1999 we have made progress toward greater fire code compliance. Council may wish to advise staff whether there are any specific concerns that you wish staff to pursue with greater vigor. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of 1999 commercial marina licenses for Windward Marina, Genmar/King's Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marina. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by ,seconded by , to direct staff to issue 1999 commercial marina licenses to Windward Marina, Genmar/King's Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marm.i. Vote: _______ayes,_____nays. License Year 1999 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marin RECEIVED MAR 0 1 1999 Date application returned to City^^ ^ ^ OFlONp ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME1. 2. U) / Street Address / ^ j7/C^ Mailing Address Marina Phone 1 OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Office Phone Fee Owner (if different than above) Address Phone 3. ,BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership ^ corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 1 1 dock attendants ^ repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc.O Page 1 of 5 List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Principal Uses V in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories boat repair and servicing on-Iand boat storage K winter __summer X X X marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses ^Conditional Use Permit is Required! _____boat club _____public boat launching, on-demand _____public boat launching, transient _____charter boat port-of-call Accessory Uses V head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food divq shop X clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental y X ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental X caretaker dwelling unit 5. BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check api*;, priatc items): X open all year List proposed hours of operation: dock access retail sales & service open during boating season only AM to PM AM to PM 6. MARINA SECURITY is provided by: CARETAKER living on site?c/1 SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Rental Rental Slips' Other Total Owned Boats Spaces Boats 7. BOATS STORED IN IHE WATER (for lake use) a. At dock slips ____ ____ ____ _____ -1 Total Boats in Water ____ ____ ____ _____ (I ^ Page 2 of 5 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings _____ Outside on Racks _____ Outside - other means _____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use b. c. 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:___________________) Total Inside Building Outside Building 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer's boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list:___________________) Total Inside Building -2- Total Outside Building 15 40 t o Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12. b. SUMMER PARKING a. Retail sales/scrvice customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) = Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] = Launching ramp customc’- (day U’f') 10 spaces minimum » = Charter boat port-of-calj c. spaces spaces spaces d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces spaces ‘7JS_ spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED 0.20 X (line 12e)a.spaces Page 3 of 5 DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent ____ Seasonal Wood ____ Concrete Metal Pilings: Decking: X Wood Flotation Method (if used): X Foam __ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other___ Other_________________ Barrels Other__ LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A. Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. C. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. 2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. e.xcept as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. 4. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application % $300.00 $__________ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $__________ Late Fee (if not postmarked by January 31) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and w’’! thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBUC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE I.ICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Authorized Signaturb^- Title f- Date Relationship to OvMier Page 5 of 5 City of Ororro P.O. Box 66 03/01/93 13:36:04 gijnsr"* 1 e 200.00 SUBTOiaTAX TOTAL SALE Check Received CHAN6E CLERKI06 TfiiWS# 200.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 9199 • • % • #. 4 <■ 't^s^sgf I . • • •• . ■ I ' ' I t « : ■ : m i I ' . . . >'l :* }',' ■ ^ ■ .1/’'V* •'> ?' y ram :'::f 1 • ^ - i^ :;^ T • « f f t; / c /,ir :■•!.:i/M>|> \ t ' . J ' . ■ ' • -1'.“ ' / .V'-i'l m • ^r>-a.Mtfd ftAr i& «SAR5 R- .•;j ; •,I ij: 49 -c:: '• I I -1*^ • ••’"•■♦'■ i r.• .nri * * Jt. I ^ • • .V: .V • /"' . I ^ •. ^ fi?4 —4^ //f I IV :.. 1 -/M -. • •• **K * * • • •••. • tl : •i / ^ -f t i~ V i,T>~L<y. •.‘jt *** V l.*y **1 '•»’’ •* ‘ ’ j' -/ IV nv . i 5l| •* *« ^ • <4 '■—j :cr;\ ^ VIV « . P^vii '•Ji • • V.%*—.... **• uS-n mm : \ I * • • License Year 1999 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina 12/16/98 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. miSINFSS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Genmar Industries, Inc. StreetAddress 100 South Sl.i St.. Suite 2400. Minneapolis, MN 55402 Mailing Address Same_________________________________________ Marina Phone Office Phone________________ 2.OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) fipnmar rndu<;trip«;, Tnc. Address Same _______________ Phone 3.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership _X corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Grant E. Oppegaard. President______________________ Mary P. McConnell, Vice President and Secretary Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: King's Cove Boat Sales________________________ List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is opt:i to the public during the boating season: 1 dock attendants ____ repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. (including above) Page 1 of 5 List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Principal Uses y in-water slip rental X sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories ____ boat repair and servicing y on-land boat storage winter summer Accessory Uses V head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop ____ clubhouse (for slip or marine fuel sales sale of b- it and fishing tackle Conditional Uses (Conditional Use Permit is Required^ ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): X open all year ____open during boating season only dock access r AM to PM retail sales & service 9 AM to 6 PM 6.MARINA SECURITY is provided by: King's Cove CARETAKER living on site? __________[la_____ SUPS AND BOAT UMTS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total Owned Boats Spaces Boats 7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) a. At dock slips ____ ____ 111 ____ HI Total Boats in Water ____ ____ 111 ____ 111 Page 2 of 5 1 usiness slip or rs) rental IS /rental only ’ space ired on total ioats 8. BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ____ b. Outside on Racks ____ c. Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ____ 9. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) 10. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:__________________) Total 11. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer's boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list:__________________) Total OFF-STREET PARKING REOIJIRKMF.NTS 12. SUMMER PARKING a. Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+l per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) b. Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x nj. (line 9)] = c. Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = d. Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = e. Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan 13. WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a. 0.20 X (line I2e) 111 Inside Building Outside Building Total Inside Building Outside Building 6-12 Total 8 spaces £2 spaces _ spaces -_spaces 75_spaces 21_spaces spaces Page 3 of 5 DOCK CONSTRUCTION 111 uMng Total uiljiiQg Total spaces spaces spaces spaces CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: X_ Permanent ____ Seasonal Wood ____ Concrete Wood____Metal Foam Pilings: Decking: Flotation Method (if used): ___ IJCFNSE STANDARDS ADVISORY X_ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other___ Other_________________ Barrels X Other Plastic Encased Foam standards: A. Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. 2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view- obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the armual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 s and icense irance € the id all lot be [h the umum ffic or estrian Lin. to 0 p.m. ite use y view It shall n plan, license -'ariablet EwsingS? .Usg Licenses Limited to No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. LlCgnsg RgvQgatlbni Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. ATTACHMF.NTS The following must accompany this application: 1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing ^d landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $?nn nn Late Fee (if not postmarked by January 31) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $200.00 REVIEW PRQCFnilRF \V^en a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application tmd will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBI.IC USE ONT.Y UPON APPROVAI. OF 1 BY THE Cn Y COUNCfT LICENSE Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code complia^e inspections. Authorized Signature {Date / Title Vice President and SprrPt;try rtics.Relationship to Owner Same Page 5 of 5 9 Highway 61 * Hastings, Minnesota 55033-1283 Phone; (612) 437-6186 • Fax: (612) 480-8909 April 9, 1999 Dear Vendor, 1 9 1999 ' - \Jl IWI:>:o This letter is to inform you of our legal business name and address. As many of you know. King’s Cove harbors three separate but complete businesses under one roof We would greatly af^.eciate it if our correct business name and address were used in both correspondence and in mailing. For those of you who have not yet changed our name and address, it is as follows: Boat Sales, Inc. D.b.a. King’s Cove Boat Sales 9 Highway 61 Su'te U4 Hastings, MN 55033 These changes are very important Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Stephen J. Bates Owner Boat Sales, Inc j 1 License Year 1999 •Jtt ( W1 W. ;C| .0 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina 12/16/98 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for emy persons to engage or part;.cipate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. Street Address i^S (j<)o ^ _LhBUSINESS OR TRADE N^^ ^ Shone l6^AV2A-ht , S'SS? I Mailing Address S ^ ^ Marina PhoneiV^'^^ ^ ^ ~ 3 3 Office Phone 2.OWNERSHIP/OPERATION ^ s Fee 0^^•ner (if different than above)(Cl j _/3c SA/U^ I J^S Address ^0 A^S' 9 <- Phone (ItZ- - Q 1 (o ~ G S 3. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) List the nai^ of each partner or corporate o individual ownership partnership xT corporation ate officer and their title: ? 7 •U t ■iLtL N f -;ie of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: List the minimum nurpber of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public duri^ the boating season: dock attendants / repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. Page 1 of 5 List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: f/X 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): V Principal Uses in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories boat repair and servicing on-land boat storage winter __summer7 Accessory Uses head pumpout fishing tournament site 3:;— sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses ^Conditional Use Permit is Required! >-^^oat club _ public boat launching, on-demand _ public boat launching, transient _ charter boat port-of-call _ caretaker dwelling unit *><1- lessons/teaching _><L>boat rental ____ sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5. BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): open all year 6. CARETAKER living on site? open during boating season only dock access ^ AM to *7 PM 5^ retail sales & service f ^ AM to^PM r.- i/rishf 7i'ii)e/ >'cc7, f / SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Owned 7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) . a. At dock slips / Total Boats in Water / Rental Rental Slips/ Other Boats Spaces Total Boats ID in.L- 71 Page 2 of 5 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ____ b. c. Outside on Racks Outside - other means Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use 9. 10. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory') c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:______ ) Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer's boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list:____________ ) Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS no Inside Building Outside Building > 11. Total Inside Building Outside Building 12.SUMMER PARKING a. Retail salej/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] = Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call b. c. d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity (gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a. 0.20 X (line 12e) ■i- Total spaces spaces spaces spaces — spaces (,p ^ spaces Aspaces Page 3 of 5 DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14. CffiCK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent ____ Seasonal Pilings: Wood Concrete Decking: ____ Wood ____ Metal Flotation Method (if used): ____ Foam LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other____ Other_______ Barrels Other Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A. Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. C. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property'. 2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. e.xcept as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and i- aving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 rtVtVMiTYil •Kill rtp-T¥ti •JOVJKiMiWC •lira itjtjiwurti rmiiiiRi If cut •141 flfp.K^fV^fsl •Kilt r*X44iT¥tT¥TiI^ ■ ft^ MraUTtTiWi^rtf#:\VJTfT^taiirtirtp.i [titffuraiiwn rtHf^f tictniiMoi f!^ Nf«0l •}sl4KlIi rtKUUiTtl (urtiiMt iflTtra [tM»r«nrt] Rie [•mi lit] Mivsiirti irm 0*1.. • ,« / y. :rs /• I ,u>»vl“ j,iia 3/. Ill '1' al|l J • • s (5r:w.«r< .r*V. .0< 7»-'^l AT. iiVA: O.t:*./ •• •:*• •r>ii7.y■f' 'If.r ►•l.-r/).;.-? .ftO l».- \.'i^s>fv tv* ft'A*. '*.• arT.f-* -,f^R^ A>#/ '* if'^j-i- •r*:r/i^r■ I >.':*•*’ >T30a •Wrr'«>. \yi\ iil'D i|l-1 V 1 . 2^ 5SJ y. (icMiiioM pooM urn eiS> ((OlVVO) dVtVU in3N‘ ,o30Ni»/ aiavAOMsu^y 5 r- C I • • . • » • nm MSIX"V\' v‘*T^x—-r—r-’i pvsqm POOM ^ HTTS^ir" f 33V^ 9 ••: ^9 «» •' '! I ■3§i5^' jJu I'!?V’ ^VAtMivAt aacojovj \\ .*•i^'iwajwjj ! sI ««l 'Ai '-r/'i1, J5 / yh / J_J*5 \ 3»l I ?!)•• ajS0J(£Jt •.,T»py>7' • Pa Af'•rji XA fJl'J/I I 0.1 If©’^'' ■m : . 4* r v'i \>> <A» r.f';i- fii^i tM .or* **/ 0 w*tn/« /ilQQJOyJ \ i) ■'rK m 'm s Al •4, i*-' *•., IISii!ls \ 4-.. .J 5 ? . I:’- t•• t’j • V iii^l I- F*S • =*•* I nf. 15 . mimmmi I * *> r License Year 1999 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina 12/16/98 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY JANUARY 31 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1 . BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME _____________ Street Address S\\aRjfe T>C: . LOkvJ?^IX. I Mailing Address'^AvjQQ______ 2. Marina Phone Mil OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different thar. above) Address Office Phone i 1 1 Phone BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: \ *2iCM^Q^AKfogg;^ A ^ _W List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: i dock attendants ^ repair or ser\ ice personnel I others available for sales/public information, etc. Page 1 of 5 I »-wws>j,:r 2 List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: 5. 4, PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Principal Uses X in-water slip rental —^ sales of boats/motors/trailers/ ^ marine accessories ^ boat repair and servicing y on-land boat storage ^ 'rinter *7^ summer - A marine fuel sales ____ sale of bait and fishing tackle Uses head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food cUve shop ^ clubhouse (for slip or ► >•, '.t boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental ____iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental Conditional Uses frnnditionfll IU a Permit is Required) ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ^ charter boat port-of-call y caretaker dwelling unit BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): — open all year ____ open during boating season only List proposed hours of operation: dock access ^ AM to ^ PM retail sales & service AM MARINA SECURITY is provided by: CARETAKER living on site? PM SLIPS AND BOAT IlN^TC List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total - _ ^ Owned Boats Spaces Boats 7. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips 1 Total Boats in W'ater a. 4 Page 2 of 5 Business 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings b. Outside on Racks 8 c. Outside - other n'eans ____ Total Boats Stored on Land „ for Lake Use O __ site i food ►r slip or lers) 1 s/rental les le/rental only :r space cred on Total Boats 9. 11. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c . * Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list: ) Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) Transient boats (repair/service)a. d. Contract storage (customer's boats) Inventory (new & used boats) Other (list:_________________ Total ) OFF-STREF.T PARKING REQUIREMENTS Inside Building Outside Building __. JO_ 2Js- Total Inside Building Outside Building 1, 12.SUMMER PARKING a. Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] - Launchi:'.g ramp customers (day use) It) sj ices minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call b. c. d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a. 0.20 X (line 12e) ^20 Total spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces Page 3 of 5 DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: . ^ Permanent ____ Seasonal De-icing normally used Pilings: Wood Concrete ___ Metal Other Decking: yc Wood V Metal ___ Foam . Wood _X Flotation Method (if used): Other Barrels Other LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORV Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the folIov\’ing business use license standards: A. Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. C. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be resjponsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in coi ormance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Page 4 of 5 Business >^se Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district othCi than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. 4. Copy of yoiu LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $ _______ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $ ZeO.bD Late Fee (if not postmarked by January 31) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONT.Y UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety c^pde~^mpliance insp>ections. Authorized Signature Date .3^ ihh Title Relationship to 0\VTier Page 5 of 5 JS t- City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, W 553E3 (612)473-7357 01/26/99 17:18:36 Custcoer: NOC LICENSE - OTHER BUS. i 9 200.00 200.00NORTH SHORE HARINR DOCK LICENS 1 9 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 200.00TAX0.00 TOTAL SALE 200.00Check Receivtd 200.00 CHANGE 0.00 CLERK! 03 TRANS!8989 '.vni'.'S v-i" % z'/Lu— //I *-M M* • • ... ® •. Nrir 0 •»•••• •/V>^ t •• #••.-%/ _>l —1 «.*75 ’ 3cnHcK/./A»^ *.. *■ “ - - .. . 1 1 1 /1 I f T M If 1/• 1 1*1 ***——————— ll‘i1 ;1 ii /«'/f /I ///I /•If If If i mm *-—m • L ./r.' SWK6 / ' UiU(.b/M& * ^ • / <* ^1 ••*• 1. ••'.rMuaXiA A '*,4 • • V .1-Ti' Pi'r^rSf »»II ir m )i 7 fro^ ............... f .•••••, *r»4W. «»A ‘r^<|CKS CO : •• • - • ■' i| A "* h — ^ ^ Co _______— ff/«i. 4lHr r A- •i*<> % rryrn^rrrrri ’, A^.iDo i; H #•*« « • % - ? #• f 1 •1^ I'lAnocovtA. fu\ f mi /’mm /)-7s ‘ : 2 SD * Sfo' ; /n.SO (f/iWruCi paoi^ ef(i(t(i\Ts U^(Bh> /A) Mf\f^,(^23 ^ (mimch lAjA^ APPpo\)e^ rcR‘ tgp<CO/ 41- « • • I. \ . . Q> ’rv \ivc ^r« * • vs-'A- ^ ■ 1| Si «r • I inwiiiiyfj, WMffl«tii| I i \ \ \ “T-" >• M '^.• i ^"^-U- j \ \ Ji'lf • • l! A •^'s '*• K ‘ *•*••—* * «| I .■>■ • 'I ‘ 1 • .••• b ^ S SI J*. I*..A C #■ ^4 • •• /•*•I C* I* :sl|t I ? I j ■j In r tp M) lA ■ 'i./> 35 » . ■? S ^ ^ " • «• ^ ... raw -•• • •• 'r I I I r.i*^ .* . •. •• • i» • • ■»c . . -.##••..•••• I •—.••••• ••• • . I 4*» •• ^ • • I • • * • • •• • I • • KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Eflfective January 1,19___to December 31, 19 Owner: Property Address; ^ *7 ^ ^ C^Al^ t ^ c i ^ jL-ea>iy ^ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):. Phone: (home) ^^6 y (work). RESIDENTLAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (paytnent must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:____ (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: ^ti/ f *3- U iOejT f Purpose for more than 2 docs: ( C^/r ^ Dogs normally kept: inside____^kennel structure COMMERCLAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_________________ Business Activities; (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours:____ After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditi^s imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Date For C.itv Use Only Kennel inspected by ^ Recommends Apprc^l f,/>, />A j-lr f iic-jt"Dat e Denial Date:December 2, 1999 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:On Sale License for 3.2 Malt Liquor 1 have reviewed the application for the above named license submitted by Grant Wenkstem on behalf of Lakeview Golf Course. After conducting routine investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date:December 2,1999 To: From: Lin Vee, City Clerk Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: On Sale License for 3.2 Malt Liquor 1 have reviewed the application for the above named license submitted by Ronald Steffenhagen on behalf of the Orono Golf Course. After conducting routine investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date:December 2, 1999 To: From: Lin Vee, City Clerk Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: Off Sale License for 3.2 Beer I have reviewed the application for above named license submitted by John O'Sullivan on behalf of his business, O'Sullivans, located at 2420 Shady wood Road. After conducting routine investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date:December 2,1999 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police,^^^^^ Subject:Off Sale License for 3.2 Beer I have reviewed the application for above named license submitted by John O'Sullivan on behalf of his business, O'Sullivans, located at 3340 Shoreline Drive. After conducting routine investigation, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date:November 17,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Polic Subject: Liquor License - On & Off Sale for 3.2 Beer I have reviewed the application submiit;--! by Donald A. Scherven on behalf of the Navarre Lanes. Routine background c'^tecks were conducted and no problems have been found. 1 have no objection to the issuance of this license. 10 Dec 1999 Check Register Frl 2:07 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Check Number 60321 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 60321 09-nec-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 341.15 60321 09-Dec-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 14.51 60321 09-Dec-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 14.51 60321 09-Dec-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 158.40 Totals Check Number 60321 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 60322 ALIMED INC 60322 lO-Dec-99 ALIMED INC Totals Check Number 60322 ALIMED INC Check Number 60323 ANCHOR PAPER 60323 09-DCC-99 ANCHOR PAPER Totals Check Number 60323 anchor paper Check Number 60124 AT & T - 60324 09-Dec-99 AT & T - Totals Check Number 60324 AT a T - Check Number 60325 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Check Number 60326 BLACKOWIAX & SON Check Number 60327 BOYER FORD 6 TRUCK 60327 10-Dec-99 BOYER FORD k TRUCK Totals Check Number 60 327 BOfER FORD li TRUCK 528.57 116.95 116.95 562.32 562.32 12.84 12.84 41.704.00 41.704.00 3/ MEETINfl ^ Comments Of c I J ,swj cnyoHo«o/vo ^ CELLULAR PHONES ON CALL PHONE ON CALL PHONE CELL PHONES ERGONOMIC MAT - COPIER COPIER PAPER LONG DIST CHGS 60325 09-Dec-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 12.65 CELL PHONE SERVICE 60325 09-Dec*99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 59.69 CELL PHONE SERVICE 60325 09-Dec-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 7.21 CELL PHONE SERVICE 60325 09-Dec-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 7.21 CELL PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 60325 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 86.76 60326 09-Dec-99 BLACKOWIAK k SON 78.90 WASTE SERVICE 10/99 6032<09-Dec-99 BLACKOWIAX k SON 157.80 WASTE SERVICE 10/99 60326 09-Dec-99 BLACKOWIAK k SON 72.33 WASTE SERVICE 10/99 60326 09-Dec-99 BLACKOWIAK k SON 191.72 WASTE SERVICE 10/99 Totals Check Number 60326 BLACKOWIAK k SON 500.75 1999 STERLING TRK - PATCH ri L ..... .. . ■ a - I I - I a ^ —Mcn V.- ' . 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM k Check ' Number Check Number Check Number Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Date Name 60327 BOYER FORD & TRUCK 60328 BUDGET PRINTING Totals Check Number 60329 BURNET TITLE Check Number 60330 CARGILL SALT 60330 09-DCC-99 CARGILL SALT Totals Check Number 60330 CARGILL SALT Check Number 60331 CHESWICK, GARY 60331 09-Dec-99 CHESWICK. GARY Totals Check Number 60331 CHESWICK GARY Check Number 60332 CHUNKS LAKFSHORE AUTO Transaction Amount i59«c::.oo 2,091.04 2,091.04 7.28 7.28 Comments 60328 09-Dec-99 BUDGET PRINTING 4.58 PAPER 60328 09-Dec-99 BUDGET PRINTING 14.94 SHIPPING CHGS 60328 09-Dec-99 BUDGET PRINTING 25.89 COVER STOCK 60328 09-Dec-99 BUDGET PRINTING 5.24 SHIPPING CHARGES Totals Check Number 60328 BUDGET PRINTING 53.65 Check Number 60329 BURNET TITLE 60329 lO-Dec-99 BURNET TITLE 8o,c::.oo PURCHASE-3790 SHORELINE 60329 lO-Dec-99 BURNET TITLE 79,c::.oo PURCHJVSE-3790 SHORELINE 60329 lO-Dec-99 BURNET TITLE c.oo PURCH*"E-3790 SHORELINE SOFTENER SALT MEALS-FIRST RESPONDER 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO in. 07 OIL CHG,LUBE 8184 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 91.22 OIL CHG,LUBE 8177 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO i::.5o TIRES, RPL RIM 8180 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 33.52 OIL CHG,LUBE 8183 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 43.36 OIL CHG,LUBE 8180 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 531.28 OIL CHG,LUBE • 185 60332 09-Dec-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 41.55 OIL CHG.LUBE 8181 Totals Check Number 60332 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 94:.50 Check Number 60333 CITY’ OP MOUND 60333 09-Dec-99 CITY 01' MOUND 24,373.00 FIRE PROTECTION 4/99 Totals Check Number 60333 CITY 01F* MOUND 24,673.00 10 Dec 1999 Pri 2:07 PM Check Check Register City of Orono Page 3 Check Number 60339 DB BAERC, DON 60339 09-Dec-99 DB BAERE, DON Totals Check Number 60339 DB BAERE, DON Check Number 60340 DELTA DENTAL Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60334 CON-MIX 60334 lO-Dec-99 CON-MIX 52.38 OBR MAIN BREAK 60334 lO-Dec-99 CON-MIX 106.37 RPR SIDEWALK -SHRLNE DRV Totals Check Number 60334 CON-MIX 158.75 Check Number 60335 CYS UNIFORMS 60335 09-Dec-99 CYS UNIFORMS 39.90 TURTLE NECKS 60335 09-Dec-99 CYS UNIFORMS 25.00 PANT TAPERS Totals Check Number 60335 CYS UNIFORMS 64.90 Check Number 60336 D.M.,J. CORPORATION 60336 09-Dec-99 D.M.J. CORPORATION 576.27 PAVIMG - LYMAN AVE Totals Check Number 60336 D.M.J. CORPORATION 576.27 Check Number 60337 DCA 60337 09-Dec-99 DCA 60.50 COBRA ADM FEB 60337 09-Dec-99 DCA 159.60 FLEX SPBMDIN ADM 11/99 Totals Check Number 60337 DCA 220.10 Check Number 60338 DCA - WIRE ONLY 60338 09-Dec-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY 702.75 SPENDING ACCTS - 11/28/99 60338 09-Dec-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY 266.88 SPENDING ACCTS - 11/17/99 Totals Check Number 60330 DCA - WIRE ONLY 969.63 19.18 19.18 MILEAGE AND PRKNG-SCHOOL 60340 09-DCC-99 DELTA DENTAL 3.64 DECEMBER DENTAL 60340 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL 0.94 DECEMBER DENTAL 60340 09-DCC-99 DELTA DENTAL 7.89 DECEMBER DENTAL 60340 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL 2.41 DECEMBER DENTAL 60340 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL 0.94 DECQ4BER DENTAL 60340 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL 5.93 DECEMBER DENTAL 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM Check Number Check Number 60340 60340 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 60340 DELTA DENTAL 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL 09-Dec-99 DELTA DENTAL Totals Check Number 60340 DELTA DENTAL Check Number 60341 60341 DEMBOUSKI, JAY 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number DEMBOUSKI, JAY 60341 DEMBOUSKI, JAY Check Number 60342 60342 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 60342 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Check Number 60343 60343 E-Z RECYCLING 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number E-Z RECYCLING 60343 E-Z RECYCLING Check Number 60344 60344 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC. lO-Dec-99 Totals Check Number EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC 60344 EARL F. ANDERSON 4 ASSOC Check Number 60345 60345 ELECTION SYSTEMS 4 SOFTWARE 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number ELECTION SYSTEMS 4 SOFTWARE 60345 ELECTION SYSTEMS 4 SOFTWARE Check Number 60346 60346 ELECTRIC PUMP 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number ELECTRIC POMP 60346 ELECTRIC PUMP Check Number 60347 60347 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 60347 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS Transaction Amount 50.65 815.00 887.40 39.94 39.94 215.59 215.59 5.697.72 5.697.72 700.63 700.63 52.87 52.87 53.92 53.92 68.80 68.80 Page 4 Comments DECE.M3ER DENTAL DECE.M3ER DENTAL SHELVING - PD PHONE SERVICE 10/99 RECYCLING CONTRCT 11/99 SIGNS, POSTS LIQUOR LICENSES LIFTING HANDLES SCAN TO .'LOT Check Number 60348 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS 10 Dec 1999 Check Register Page 5 Fri 2:07 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60348 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 60348 09-Dec-99 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 472.86 SAN MANHOLE I&I 60348 09-Dec-99 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 277.97 RINGS, GLUE 161 Totals Check Number 60348 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 750.83 Check Number 60349 FEDEX 60349 09-Dec-99 FEDEX 10.50 DEL TO DEPT OF JUSTICE Totals Check Number 60349 FEDEX 10.50 Check Nun^er 60350 FORTIS BENEFITS 60350 09-Dec-99 FORTIS BENEFITS 734.25 LTD INS - 12/99 Totals Check Number 60350 FORTIS BENEFITS 734.25 Check Number 60352 G fit K SERVICES 60352 09-Dec-99 G k K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN 60352 09-Dec-99 G & K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN 60352 09-Dec-99 G (i K SERVICES 55.11 MATS - PD 60352 09-Dec-99 G k K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60352 C9-Dec-99 G k K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60352 O*-Dec-99 G k K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60352 C--Dec-99 G k K SERVICES 76.39 UNIFORMS 60352 0 -Dec-99 G 6 K SERVICES 30.09 SHOP TOWELS 60352 C3-Dec-99 G fc K SERVICES 92.66 UNIFORMS 60352 0.^-Dec-99 G ii K SERVICES 76.39 UNIFORMS 60352 09-Dec-99 Q k K SERVICES 30.88 SHOP TOWELS 60352 09-Dec-99 Q k K SERVICES 42.01 MATS - CC 60352 09-Dec-99 Q A K SERVICES 42.01 MATS - ADM 60352 09-Dec-99 Q Ii K SERVICES 86.44 MATS - PW 60352 09-Dec-99 Q k K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN 60332 09-Dec-99 Q Ii K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM • STEFFENHAGEN 60352 09-Dec-99 G Ii K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60352 09-Dec-99 G Ii K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60352 09-Dec-99 G 6 K SERVICES 74.66 UNIFORMS 60352 09-Dec-99 G Ii K SERVICES 75.89 UNIFORMS 60352 09-Dec-99 G Ii K SERVICES 34.47 SHOP TOWELS Totals Check Number 60352 G Ii K SERVICES 821.18 Check Number 60353 GALL'S INC. 60353 09-Dec-99 GALL'S INC.73.95 GLOVES, TRTLNECK- .4ICHLS -I r 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2x07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60353 60353 60353 GALL'S INC. 09-Dec-99 GALL'S INC. 09-Dec-99 GALL'S INC. Totals Check Nun^er 60353 GALL'S INC. Check Number 60354 GE CAPITAL 60354 09-Dec-99 GE CAPITAL Totals Check Number 60354 GE CAPITAL Check Number 60357 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 60357 60357 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC GOPHEP STATE ONE-CALL INC Totals Check Number 60357 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Check Number 60350 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 60358 60358 09-Dec-99 09-DCC-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Totals Check Number 60353 HENNEPIN COUJrTY TREAS. Check Number 60359 HENNEPIN COUIiTY TREASURER-ACCT 60359 lO-Dec-99 HE.NNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Transaction Amount 51.80 28.16 153.91 71.70 71.70 30.63 30.62 61.25 25.00 28.56 53.56 7,950.00 Page 6 Comments SHIRTS SHIRT I* MOUNTING RAILS-TAPE DRV 1 Check Number 60356 GENUINE PARTS CO. 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.13.79 FUEL FILTER 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.12.67 FUEL FILTER 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.10.63 SHOP SUPPLIES 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.46 BATTERY, BAT WASH 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.11.17 SHOP SUPPLIES 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.8.54 OIL FILTER 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.13.89 BELT 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.-0.10 EXCHANGE - BELTS 60356 09-DCC-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.8.26 FITTING 60356 09-DCC-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.10.02 SUPPLIES 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.-0.85 EXCHANGE 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.34.87 LIGHTS FOR GRADER 60356 09-Dec-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.67 OIL FILTER Totals Check Number 60356 GENUINE PARTS CO.142.02 LOCATES 10/99 LOCATES 10/99 MAILING LIST, LABELS POSTAL VERIFICATIONS 1ST HALF ASSESSING CNTRCT 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60359 60359 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT lO-Dec-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Totals Check Number 60359 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Check Number 60360 HmiEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV 60360 09-Dec-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV Totals Check Number 60360 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV Check Number 60361 HINZE BUSINESS MACHINES 60361 09-Dec-99 HINZE BUSINESS MACHINES Totals Check Number 60361 HINZE BUSINESS MACHINES Check Number 60362 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. 60362 09-Dec-99 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. Totals Check Number 60362 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. Check Number 60363 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 60363 09-Dec-99 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Totals Check Number 60363 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Check Number 60364 JOHNSON* BRAD 60364 09-Dec-99 JOHNSON, BRAD Totals Check Number 60364 JOHNSON, BRAD Check Number 60365 JOHNSON, MARY ANN 60365 lO-Dec-99 JOHNSON, NARY ANN Totals Check Number 60365 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Check Number 60366 KD li COMPANY 60366 09-Dec-99 KD k COMPANY Totals Check Number 60366 KD k COMPANY Check Number 60367 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 60367 09-Dec-99 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Transaction Amount 39.750.00 47.700.00 273.87 273.87 83.63 83.63 2,341.20 2,341.20 217.15 217.15 26.31 26.31 25.00 25.00 40.OU 40.00 2,291.66 Page 7 Comments 1ST HALF ASSESSING CNTRCT RM AND BOARD - 10/99 RPR IMB SELECTRIC METERS FOR RESALE BATTERIES-LOADER MEALS - TRAINING RECORD SIGNATURE-NOTARY ASPHALT, CONCRETE DUMP PROSECUTION 11/99 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2;07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60367 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Totals Check Number 60367 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Check Number 60368 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Check Number 60369 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 60369 09-Dec-99 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60369 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Check Number 60370 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 60370 60370 lO-Dec-99 lO-Dec-99 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60370 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 60371 M & M ENTERPRISES 60371 09-Dec-99 M 6 M ENTERPRISES Totals Check Number 60371 M 6 M ENTERPRISES Check Number 60372 MAGIC CLEANERS 60372 09-Dec-99 MAGIC CLEANERS Totals Check Number 60372 MAGIC CLEANERS Check Number 60373 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 60373 60373 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 Totals Check Number 60373 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Check Number 60374 MIDWEST ASPHALT 09-Dec-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT Transaction Amount 2,291.66 53.24 53.24 6.38 5.80 12.18 40.00 40.00 13.16 13.16 Page 8 Comments 60368 09-Dec-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 6.52 COLLAR, NPPLS 60368 09-Dec-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 12.25 FILTER 60368 09-Dec-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 15.92 PIN ASSORTMENT 60368 09-Dec-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 3.69 MISC SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 60368 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 38.38 HELMET SYSTEM FLOOR DRY SWITCH MAINT ON PRESSURE WASHER BLANKET CLEANING SER 5,250.00 OCTOBER 1999 SAC SER -52.50 OCTOBER 1999 ADM FEE SER 5,197.50 •1 i ] 60374 78.52 HAND PATCH 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60374 60374 60374 MIDWEST ASPHALT 09-Dec-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT 09-DCC-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Number 60374 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Number 6037S MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPAirf Check Number 60380 60360 MOROWCZYNSKI. JIM 09-Dec-99 MOROWCZYNSKI. JIM Totals Check Number 60300 MOROWCZYNSKI. JIM Check Number 60383 NAVARRE HARDWARE Transaction Amount 174.72 149.72 402.96 21.83 21.83 Page 9 Comments MANHOLES - I fc I PROJ HAND PATCH 60375 09-Dec-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 13.50 MEDICAL OXYGEN 60375 lO-Dec-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXY3EN COMPANY 27.00 ACETYLENE. OXYGEN Totals Check Number 60375 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 40.50 Check Number 60376 MINNEGASCO 60376 09-Dec-99 MINNEGASCO 574.14 GAS SERVICE 60376 09-Dec-99 MINNEGASCO 12.28 GAS SERVICE 60376 09-Dec-99 MINNEGASCO 278.38 GAS SERVICE 60376 09-Dec-99 MINNEGASCO 186.85 GAS SERVICE 60376 09-Dec-99 MINNEGASCO 280.48 GAS SERVICE Totals Check Number 60376 MINNEGASCO 1.282.13 Check Number 60377 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS 60377 lO-Dec-99 MINNESOTA SUN rVBLICATIONS 209.45 ADVERTISEMENT Totals Check Number 60377 MINNESOTA SUN FJ3LICATIONS 209.45 Check Number 60378 MN CHIEF (DF POLICE ASSN 6C378 09-Dec-99 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 23.30 GUN PERMITS Totals Check Number 60378 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 23.30 Check Number 60379 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATICN 60379 lO-Dec-99 MN DEPT OP TRANSPORTATION 30.42 CONCRETE INSP-FBRNDALE 60379 lO-Dec-99 MN DEPT OF TRA.NSPORTATION 165.03 MATERIAL INSP-FERNDALE Totals Check Number 60379 MN DEPT OF TRAIoPORTATION 195.45 MEALS. PRKING. SCHOOL 10 Dec 1999 Check Register Page : Fri 2:07 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60383 NAVARRE HARDWARE 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 13.26 MARKING PAINT 60383 09-DCC-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.88 BULK ANCHORS 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.21 BATTERY, FURNANCE FILTER 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 25.52 CAULK 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 14.24 CONCRETE MIX, GRSS SEED 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 9.88 ENAMIL, BRUSH 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 19.32 PAINT. ENAMIL. PRIMER 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.12 ANT TRAP 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 19.11 ANTI FREEZE. FUNNEL 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.11 MIRROR 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.27 SINGLE CUT KEY 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 29.78 HANDLES 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11.60 BULB 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.18 UTILITY HOOK 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.69 EYE BOLT 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.28 BULK SCREWS 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 4.22 CABLE TIE 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 8.50 HALOGEN BULB 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 32.04 LEVELS. TAPE MSR 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.12 MISC SUPPLIES 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 10.60 BULK NUTS, LIQ NAILS, BLT 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.32 LIQUID NAILS 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.38 BLACKTOP PATCH 60383 09-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 23.99 CONCRETE. MORTAR MIX 60383 lO-Dec-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 4.89 TEST PLUG Totals Check Number 60383 NAVARRE HARDWARE 266.51 Check Number 60384 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 60384 09-Dec-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Total* Check Number 60384 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Check Number 6C385 NSP 108.00 DECEMBER PERA LIFE 108.00 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 1,186.93 STREET LIGHTING 11/99 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 1.074.61 ELECTIRCAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 436.88 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 ' lO-Dec-99 NSP 116.24 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 23.56 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 2.698.81 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dec-99 NSP 1.046.28 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60385 lO-Dcc-99 NSP 267.16 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 6038S NSP 6.859.89 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2j07 pm Check Register City oC Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 603^6 60386 OBRIEN, RANDY 09-Dec-99 OBRIEN, RANDY Totals Check Number 60386 OBRIEN, RANDY Check Number 60387 OTTEN BROTHERS 60387 09-Dec-99 OTTEN BROTHERS Totals Check Number 60387 OTTEN BROTHERS Check Number 60388 PAGENET 60388 .09-Dec-99 PAGENET Totals Check Number 60388 PAGENET Check Number 60389 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 60389 lO-Dec-99 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Totals Check Number 60389 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Check Number 60390 PIONEER 60390 60390 60390 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 60390 PIONEER Check Number 60391 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 60391 60391 09-DCC-99 09-Dec-99 POVfERCLEAN COMPANY INC POVfERCLEAN COMPANY INC Totals Check Number 60391 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC Check Number 60392 S-P TESTING, INC 60392 lO-Dec-99 S-P TESTING, INC Totals Check Number 60392 S-P TESTING, INC Check Number 60393 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60393 09-DCC-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES Transaction Amount 100.00 100.00 59.64 59.64 259.20 259.20 30.00 30.00 46.23 516.81 215.33 778.37 762.01 931.34 1,693.35 1,450.00 1,450.00 22.44 Page 11 Comments WORK BOOT REIMBURSEMENT SOD POSITION PROFILE ZONING CODE REVISION PUBLISH ORDINANCE 193 NOTICE OF PRPSED BUDGET JANITORIAL 11/99 JANITORIAL 11/99 SITE EVAL-4300 WATERTWN FILM, PUFFS a i 10 Dec 1999 Check Register Page Fri 2:07 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60393 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60393 09-Dec-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 3.34 PHOTO PROCESSING 60393 09-Dec-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 1.80 ENVELOPES 60393 09-Dec-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 19.11 FILM 60393 09-Dec-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 145.31 FILM Totals Check Number 60393 SNYDER DRUG STORES 192.00 Check Number 60394 SPALDING 60394 lO-Dec-99 SPALDING 131.20 GOLF BALLS Totals Check Number 60394 SPALDING 331.20 Check Number 60395 STREICHERS 60395 09-Dec-99 STREICHERS 7.40 NAME TAG - HOECHST 60395 09-Dec-99 STREICHERS •38.38 RETURNS - HOECHST 60395 09-Dec-99 STREICHERS 21.95 GLOVES - JOHNSON 60395 09-Dec-99 STREICHERS 27.90 GLOVES - CHESWICK 60395 09-Dec-99 STREICHERS 10.60 IRRITANT. MACE HLDER Totals Check Number 60395 STREICHERS 29.47 Check Number 60396 60396 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. 09>Dec-99 SUBURBAN TIRE INC Totals Check Number 60396 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Check Number 60397 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 60397 09-Dec-99 TALLEN AND EAERTSCHI Totals Check Number 60397 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI Check Number 60390 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 60398 60398 60398 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Totals Check Number 60398 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Check Number 60399 TMB CONSULTING INC 60399 09-Dec-99 TMB CONSULTING INC Totals Check Number 60399 TMB CONSULTING INC 186.08 186.08 SNOW TIRES 110.50 110.50 DWI PROSECUTION 324.00 411.75 432.00 TEMP HELP-WK END 11/20/99 TEMP HELP WK OF 11/21/99 TEMP HELP-EK END 12/5/99 1.167.75 461.98 461.98 NEW HRDDRVB - L VEE 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60400 60400 60400 60400 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY 09-Dec-99 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY 09- DCC-99 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY 10- Dec-99 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 60400 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY Check Number 60401 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 60401 6U?01 60401 60401 09-Dec-99 09- Dec-99 10- Dec-99 lO-Dec-99 TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number 60401 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Check Number 60402 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. 60402 09-Dec-99 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. Totals Check Number 60402 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. Check Number 60403 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 60403 09-Dec-99 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60403 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 60404 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 60405 6040S WARNING LITES OF MN 09-Dec-99 WARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 60405 WARNING LITES OF MN Check Number €''406 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE Transaction Amount 5.89 79.46 5.65 91.20 471.65 1,519.92 1,648.78 368.64 4,008.99 29.37 29.37 1,800.00 1,800.00 106.95 108.95 Page 13 Comments CYLINDER RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES CYLINDER RENTAL DIESEL FUEL 455.7 GAL UNLEADED 1415.2 GAL 1442.5 GAL UNLEADED 360 GAL DIESEL 3- ROLLERS POSTAGE FOR METER 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 53.65 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 44.63 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 905.07 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 30.17 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 70.39 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 64.74 TELEPHONE SERVICE 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 202.30 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 114.56 MODEM LINE - LOGIS 60404 lO-Dec-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 79.00 :*OM LINE WTR TWR TO PW Totals Ciieck Number 60404 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,564.51 BARRICADES - -— ~- - - - - - - -... . .m. -- 10 Dec 1999 Fri 2:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60406 60406 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE 09-Dec-99 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE Totals Check Number 60406 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE Check Number 60407 WILLIAMS towing 60407 60407 09-Dec-99 09-Dec-99 WILLIAMS TOWING WILLIAMS TOWING Totals Check Number 60407 WILLIAMS TOWING Check Number 60408 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Grand Total Transaction Amount 2,600.00 2,600.00 60.50 74.55 135.05 328,740.39 Page 14 Comments PARK MOWING - 9 fc 10/99 TOW 88 MUSTANG-EVIDENCE TOW - 89 CHV VAN 60408 09-Dec-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 24.92 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60408 09-Dec-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 8.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60408 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 32.92 ^ck Number 60409 YOUNG, JACKIE 60409 lO-Dec-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 125.00 PA.RK COM 11/1/99 60409 lO-Dec-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 125.00 CON COM 11/4/99 60409 lO-Dec-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 CITY COUNCIL 11/8/99 60409 lO-Dec-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 225.00 PLAN COM 11/15/99 60409 lO-Dec-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 125.00 CON COM 11/18/59 Totals Check Number 60409 YOUNG,JACKIE 750.00 1 ifI 9 Dec 1999 Thu 9:37 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046931 046931 PETERSON, B;iRBARA Totals Check Number 046931 Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Check Date 13-Dec-99 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 Check Number 046932 046932 NOORSE* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046932 Check Number 046933 13-Dec-99 184.70 184.70 046933 FLINT, RICHARD Totals Check Number 046933 13-Dec-99 269.36 269.36 Check Number 046934 046934 JABBOUR, GABRIEL E. Totals Check Number 046934 Check Number 046935 13-Dec-99 323.22 323.22 046935 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Check Number 04693S 13-Dec-99 269.36 269.36 Check Number 046936 046936 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 046936 13-Dec-99 269.36 269.36 Grand Total 1,585.36 1 Dec 1999 Wed 8:28 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046863 046863 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046863 Check Number 046864 046864 BERRY, HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 046864 Check Number 046865 046865 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046865 Check Number 046866 046866 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046866 Check Number 046867 046867 VEE, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 046867 Check Number 046868 046868 KUEKN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046868 Check Number 046869 046869 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046869 Check Number 046870 046870 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046870 Check Number 046871 Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 1 Check Amount 541.41 541.41 697.70 697.70 699.89 699.89 1,567.06 1,567.06 1,072.10 1,072.10 1,019.22 1,019.22 28.53 28.53 414.65 414.65 1 Dec 1999 Wed 8:28 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046971 046871 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046871 Check Number 046872 046872 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 046872 Check Number 046873 046873 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 046673 Check Number 046874 046874 CARLSON, MICHAEL d. Totals Check Number 046874 Check Number 046875 046875 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 046675 Check Number 046876 046876 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 046876 Check Number 046877 046877 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046877 Check Number 046878 046878 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 046878 Check Number 046879 046879 FARNIOK, CORREY L Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 2 Check Amount 501.10 501.10 730.27 730.27 1,153.46 1,153.46 214.26 214.26 1,519.16 1,519.16 1.598.69 1.596.69 1,317.94 1,317.94 1,360.09 1,360.09 1,282.99 1 Dec 1999 Wed 8:28 AM Check Register City of Orono Check NuiRber Employee Name Check Number 046879 Totals Check Number 046879 Check Number 046880 046880 FISCHCNICH* DAN T. Totals Check Number 046880 Check Number 046881 046881 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 046881 Check Number 046882 046882 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046682 Check Number 046883 046883 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046883 Check Number 046884 046884 NADSON, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 046884 Check Number 046885 046865 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 04688S Check Number 046886 046886 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L. Totals Check Number 046886 Check Number 046887 046887 MORCWCZYNSKI, JAMES Check Date oi-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dcc-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1,282.99 1.220.16 1,220.16 1,301.45 1,301.45 437.42 437.42 1,281.39 1,281.39 469.83 469.83 1,114.47 1,114.47 591.78 591.78 1,594.34 mi hi ■ininniirtl-nn I Dec 1999 Wed 8:20 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 04^3i7 Totals Check Number 048887 Check Number 046888 046888 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046888 Check Number 046089 046889 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046889 Check Number 046890 046090 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE P. Totals Check Number 046890 Check Number 046^91 046891 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 046891 Check Nun^er 046892 046892 WITTKE, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 046892 Check Number 046893 046093 HOECHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046893 Check Number 046894 046094 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 046894 Check Number 046695 046895 BOTTENBERQ. WENDY C. Totals Check Number 046895 Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 4 Check Amount 1,594.34 357.84 357.84 1,308.42 1,308.42 453.09 453.09 1,284.62 1,284.62 334.46 334.46 572.24 572.24 306.17 306.17 974.89 974.09 ‘r^TvaniKii 1iiii,i II11 im 1 Dec X999 Wed 8:28 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046895 Check Number 046696 046896 DAVIS, NARK L. Totals Check Number 046896 Check Number 046097 046897 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 046897 Check Number 046098 046898 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046898 Check Number 046699 046899 MEYER, WILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 046899 Check Number 046900 046900 OMAN, LYLE E. Totals Check Number 046900 Check Number 046901 046901 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M. Totals Check Number 046901 Check Number 046902 046902 WEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046902 Check Number 046903 046903 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F. Totals Check Number 046903 Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 5 Check Amount 1,068.47 1,068.47 1.168.59 1.160.59 1,569.51 1,569.51 401.56 401.56 315.34 315.34 782.02 782.02 1,064.02 1,064.02 1,121.74 1,121.74 ¥i ¥' > 1 Dec 1999 Wed 8:28 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046904 046904 DEBAERE, DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046904 Check Number 046905 046905 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046905 Check Number 046906 046906 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 046906 Check Number 046907 046907 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046907 Check Number 046908 046908 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046908 Check Number 046909 046909 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046909 Check Number 046910 046910 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 046910 Check Number 046911 046911 SKREEN, DALE S Totals Check Number 046911 Check Number 046912 046912 STEFFEHHAGEN, RONALD B Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 6 Check Amount 904.07 904.07 853.94 853.94 654.01 654.01 801.01 801.01 224.78 224.78 645.64 645.64 886.70 886.70 642.99 642.99 1,097.20 1 Dec 1999 Wed 8:28 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 046912 Totals Check Number 046912 1,097.20 Grand Total 43,522.68 1 Dec 1999 Wed 12:17 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046914 046914 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046914 Check Number 046915 046915 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 046915 Check Number 046916 046916 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 046916 Check Number 046917 046917 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046917 Check Number 046918 046918 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 046918 Check Number 046919 046919 FARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 046919 Check Number 046920 046920 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 046920 Check Number 046921 046921 FISCHER <VR..TOPHER K Totals Check Number 046921 Check Number 046922 Check Date Ol-Dec-99 01-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 1 Check Amount 1,727.32 1,727.32 221.58 221.58 1,584.69 1,584.69 1,394.26 1,394.26 927.36 927.36 1,339.20 1,339.20 1.35x22 1,351.22 1,074.97 1,074.97 ■i I Dec 1999 Wed 12:17 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046922 046922 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046922 Check Number 046923 046923 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046923 Check Number 046924 046924 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046924 Check Number 04692S 046925 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 04692S Check Number 046926 046926 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046926 Check Number 046927 046927 TOMCHECK, LAh?ENCE F. Totals Check Number 01692*’ Check Number 046928 046928 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 046928 Check Number 046929 046929 WITTKE. ANTHONY A Totals Check Number 046929 Grand Total Check Date Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Ol-Dec-99 Page 2 Check Amount 258.26 258.26 1,634.68 1,634.68 203.59 203.59 1,522.04 1,522.04 1,119.96 1,119.96 1,418.49 1,418.49 1,642.35 1,642.35 445.46 445.46 17,865.43 vi* i ^(^ffAtcn MEETING OiC I 3 1999 CITY OF OROiVo information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING ’i COUNCIL M6ETINQ DEC 1 3 t999 CITY Of OHONO OF YEAR-TO-DATE iT NBR. ^RMTISS-1 ^1/01/99 « s . PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE PERM II- tTpe O Bail; SGL DUPL'MC-NEW SP-ADD/RBMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/REMODBL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-ADD/RBMODEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical Hl.'VlNG SYSTEMS AIP :*i5^T)lTIONING WOOii) STOVE/FLUE r yi?ii^itATTON .^AGE GAS vHE INSPECT DUC roRK ONLY rek'^jE oil tank Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer 6 Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD a/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER REPAIR SEWER a WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED QTY 28 1 272 34 17 1 6 0 0 2 5 8 374* 103 17 5 68 9 2 19 7 8 238* 141 1 10 4 2 158* 18 1 28 1 14 0 2 5 7 1 77* -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 BASE FEE 77,747 1,637 86,035 5,373 1,060 3,099 1,763 0 0 963 150 3,045 180,876 13,023 839 177 3,029 372 410 705 303 2,672 21,532 .75 .25 .80 .30 .00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .75 .10* .22 .13 .50 .10 .50 .00 .00 .75 .55 .75* 13,102.78 93.75 6,080.00 140.00 70.00 19,486.53* 630 35 2,670 50 16,800 0 105 175 4 90 35 20,990 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* VALUATION 13,092,661.55 250,000.00 8,271,832.24 316.360.00 0.00 550,000.00 131.375.00 0.00 0.00 88,000.00 0.00 225.725.00 22,925,953.79* 023, 55, 5, 180, 17, 32, 17, 13, 205, 550, 691.90 885.50 6C0.00 103.89 315.00 800.00 050.00 250.00 133.79 830.08* 950,333.36 7.500.00 0.00 800.00 2.889.00 961,522.36* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* PLAN REVIEW 50,536 1,064 39,630 3,346 0 2,014 810 0 0 0 0 1,979 99,382 .02 .21 .25 .71 .00 .84 .23 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .74 .00* 00 00 00 00 00 00 oO 0^ 0. V 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00* 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 10/31/90 48.50 1,500.00 0.00 QTY BASE FEE VALUATION 30 76,486.75 14,135,739.44 0 0.00 0.00 325 80,116.75 7,188,968.70 37 8,933.25 855,890.00 14 730.00 0.00 1 6,365.25 1,492,000.00 6 3,051.25 367,555.00 5 1,462.25 110,000.00 1 50.00 0.00 4 977.00 124,980.00 6 180.00 0.00 23 4,998.75 339,059.20 452*183,351.25*24,614,192.34* 90 12,845.40 1,009,835.44 21 1,031.10 71,105.52 2 70.00 3,000.00 69 2,910.19 162,093.00 8 280.00 10,135.00 n 0.00 0.00 J 280.00 7,984.00 17 611.25 24,683.00 11 481.25 19,213.75 226*18,509.19*1,308,049.71* 148 12,771.56 885,950.38 1 82.75 6,620.00 9 1,635.00 1,225.00 10 350.00 2,600.00 1 35.00 600.00 169*14,874.31*896,995.38* 41 1,435.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 32 3,150.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 44 43,250.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 2 70.00 750.00 1 70.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 126*40,195.00*750.00* 1 137.25 7,800.00 PLAN REVIEW 49,716 0 34,205 5,458 0 4,137 1,765 105 0 0 0 3,083 98,471 .33 .00 .47 .08 .00 .41 .07 .46 .00 .00 .00 .62 .44* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0 YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 11/01/99 *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * * * * *PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE PERMIT TYPE PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIRE SPRINKLER FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION RETAINING WALLS DOCKS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total 01/01/99 - KiWUC. - - - 10/31/99 >TY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 1 21.00 4‘.0.00 0.00 5 140.00 0.00 0.00 209.50*1,950.00*0.00* 2 422.50 33,800.00 0.00 3 1,698.88 135,550.00 0.00 5*2,121.30*169,350.00*0.00* 17 880.00 0.00 0.00 1 441.75 30,000.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 19 665.00 0.00 0.00 38*2,016.75*30,000.00*0.00* 01/01/98 - KMnVj£i ------- 10/31/90 ITY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 1 74.75 2,500.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 4*282.00*10,300.00*0.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.650.00 292,000.00 0.00 1*3,650.00*292,000.00*0.00* 32 1,700.00 500.00 0.00 1 07.25 4,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 1,085.00 0.00 0.00 64*2,872.25*4,500.00*0.00* Grand-total 097**247,233.01** 25,639,606.23** 99,382.00** 1,042** 271,734.00** 27,126,787.43** 90,471.44** r> •«’ * *r YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPBERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 PERMIT FEE CITY OF FROM 01/01/99 REPORT ORONO TO 10/31/99 PAGE: REQUESTER: CAROLE BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE 180,876.10 21,532.75 19,406.53 20,990.00 2,016.75 209.50 2,121.38 PLAN REVIEW 99,382.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 11,412.31 781.76 491.77 31.50 24.50 0.75 84.88 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 7,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 5,167.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL IN MAIL IN MAIL IN FEE MAIL-IN FEE 145.12 1.50 24.49 33.95 53.98 7.50 15.00 4.50 1.50 3.00 1.50 4.50 1.50 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 304,187.91 22,519.57 20,054.70 21,121.50 2,150.25 211.75 2,212.26 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 11/01/99 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN MAIL IN MAIL IN FEE MAIL-IN PEE ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 247.233.01 99,382.00 12,027.47 0.00 7,350.00 5,367.50 0.00 209.60 1.50 33.49 53.45 0.00 372.458.02 ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 10/31/99 PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN H/Ol/99 ***** permit issued report ***** CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE pivNrsE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 01/01/99 - -- - - - - - -- 10/31/99 01/01/98 -10/31/98 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW User Defined SUBDIVISION 19 17,920.00 0.00 0.00 16 7,037.50 0.00 0*00 VARIANCE 45 11,200.00 0.00 0.00 62 15,510.00 0.00 0.00 CUP 12 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 16 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 10 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 4 1,150.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 6 1,850.00 0.00 0.00 7 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 VACATION 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 A A A REZONING 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 RQST SIMILAR USE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 250.00 0.00 0.00 ZONING CODE AMEN 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 90*36,070.00*0.00^0.00*109*29,497.50*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 36,070.00**0.00^*0.00**109**29,497.50**0.00**0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT ** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 10/31/99 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 36,070.00 36,070.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 36,070.00 36,070.00 1999 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES January Febru:iry Warch _RgrU June July August Septewber October Movewber Deceaijer YTD Totals Soring Park _ _ _ Plan Revieu 40.46 274.14 0.00 2,760.22 2,063.10 1,576.90 3,095.31 1,389.54 598.00 2,317.90 11,797.67 Inspections 120.00 45.00 195.00 135.00 135.00 180.00 150.00 360.00 210.00 360.00 1,525.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 250.00 TOTAL 183.46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22 2,223.10 1,781.90 3,270.31 1,774.54 833.00 2,702.90 16,255.57 Mo. Plan Reviews 1 1 0 4 4 4 5 3 2 2 26 No. Inspections 8 3 13 9 9 12 10 24 14 24 126 Minnetonka Beach _ Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 787.80 739.21 4,565.86 1,636.86 5,677.42 4U.92 14,820.41 Inspections 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 60.00 180.00 300.00 435.00 270.00 165.00 1,800.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 250.00 TOTAL 653.59 70.00 247.96 486.79 872.80 944.21 4,890.86 2,096.86 5,972.42 634.92 16,870.41 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 2 1 7 3 4 2 22 No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 4 12 20 29 18 11 120 839.05 414.14 467.96 3,407.01 3,095.90 2,726.11 8,161.17 3,871.40 6,805.42 3,337.82 33,125.98 OCTOBER 1999 REPORT NBR. DAT^ OF RUN Em 5 ^ PEIi(IIT«ZXP^ S^F^LY^EW S^ADD/REMfjbEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/REMODEL INST-ADD/REMODEL ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical BPRMTISS-1 11/01/99 QTY 3 37 4 0 0 0 2 46* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO « * * * 4r PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/99 - 10/31/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 10/01/98 - 10/31/98 BASE FEE 7,948.25 11,285.25 723.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 836.00 20,792.55* VALUATION 1,190,000.00 1,021,272.00 42.000. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.000. 00 2,311,272.00* PLAN REVIEW 5,166.37 5,223.31 469.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 543.40 11,403.06* QTY 6 40 3 1 1 1 2 54* BASE FEE 14,338.50 12,177.00 294.25 50.00 1,267.25 74.75 449.50 28,651.25* VALUATION 2,701,408.00 1,336,850.44 17,000.00 0.00 175,680.00 2,500.00 29,424.00 4,262,862.44* PLAN REVIEW 9,320.01 4,961.60 22.59 0.00 823.71 0.00 146.09 15,294.00* HEATING SYSTEMS 12 1,235.97 96,986.00 0.00 8 691.25 51,017.00 0.00 WOOD STOVE/FLUE 1 35.00 500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIREPLACE 18 672.82 35,269.19 0.00 9 315.00 14,050.00 0.00 VENTILATION 2 70.00 2,875.00 0.00 1 35.00 810.00 0.00 FUEL STORAGE 1 97.50 7,800.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 GAS LINE INSPECT 2 70.00 1,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DUCT WORK ONLY 1 35.00 500.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,700.00 0.00 REMOVE OIL TANK 1 35.00 1,750.00 0.00 2 166.25 11,500.00 0.00 Sub-total 38*2,251.29*147,180.19*0.00*23*1,312.50*79,077.00*0.00* Plumbing FIXTURES 16 1,759.39 163,355.00 0.00 13 948.40 64,047.00 0.00 UNDEFINED 1 35.00 009.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 .Sub-total 17*1,794.37*U.4,244.00*0.00*1 4*940.40*r,4,04 7.00*0.00* Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 10 350.00 0.00 0.00 NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 6 600.00 0.00 0.00 2 200.00 0.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 2 2,100.00 0.00 0.00 13 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 SEWER REPAIR 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEWER & WATER 2 140.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNDEFINED 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 14*2,980.00*0.00*0.00*25*13,550.00*0.00*0.00* sign TEMPORARY 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*35.00*0.00*0.00*0*0.00*o.oc*0.00* Fire FIRE SPRINKLER 1 125.00 10,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1*125.00*10,000.00*0.00*0*0.00*0.00*0.00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION 3 200.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 RETAINING WALLS 1 441.75 30,000.00 0.00 1 87.25 4 .00.00 0.00 LAWN SPRINKLER 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 c.oo 0.00 Sub-total 5*676.75*30,000.00*0.00*4*222.25*4 ;»^o.oo*0.00* Grand-total 122**28,654.90**2,662,696.19**11,403.06**119**44,604.40**4,4c>,9bo t4**15,294.00** OCTOBER 1999 REPORT NBR, BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 permit fee CITY OF FROM 10/01/99 REPORT ORONO TO 10/31/99 PAGE: ^ REQUESTER: CAROLE BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER U WATER USER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE 20,792.55 2,251.29 1,794.39 2,980.00 676.75 35.00 125.00 PLAN REVIEW 11,403.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 1,156.06 74.60 83.62 6.00 15.50 0.00 5.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL-IN FEE 20.60 9.00 1.50 MAIL IN FEE 3.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 34,401.67 2,349.57 1,887.01 2,986.00 692.25 35.00 131.50 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 •***• PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/99 TO 10/31/99 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 20,654.98 PLAN REVIEW 11.403.06 SURCHARGE 1,340.86 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 1,050.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL-IN FEE MAIL IN FEE 31.10 3.00 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 42,403.00 PAGE: 44 . REQUESTER: CAROLE ^ MON, NOV 1, ^999, 4:39 PM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1 OCTOBER 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-011935 13281421 RVC HOMES 375,000.00 OR-012029 14754902 PILLAR HOMES 520,000.00 OR-012062 17313153 CHARLES CUDD CO 295,000.00 OR-011911 14791890 STRUCTURES UNLIMITED INC HUSSAIN 65,000.00 OR-011948 19340106 BOLDENOW JERRY CASHMAN 100,000.00 OR-012002 00000000 KYLE 350,000.00 OR-012007 13G14949 KNIGHT CONST/DESINCNS INC PALM 25,600.00 OR-01196!)17394235 DAVID M. NORD JUNDT 40,000.00 OR-012009 00000000 WHITELEY 18,000.00 OR-012040 00000000 SANDBERG 3,500.00 OR-011979 14539406 RENSLOW'S DECKS & GAZEBOS GARRETT 10,000.00 OR-011915 15429000 DALPHIN POOL fit SPA TOPOUSIS 20,000.00 OR-011973 15429000 DALPHIN POOL fit SPA LINDGREN 20,000.00 OR-011966 17216628 PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA SPAULDING 22,713.00 OR-011976 00000000 COOPER 1,500.00 OR-011995 00000000 HAUS 1,000.00 OR-012057 00000000 MCKEE 2,600.00 OR-012070 17216628 PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA LUNIESKI 22,860.00 OR-011938 00000000 LAGUE 10,000.00 OR-011939 00000000 BULL 1,200.00 OR-01194C 00000000 BLOCK 2,500.00 OR-011950 14042984 METRO HANDYMAN KREY 3,500.00 OR-011951 00000000 FREDRICKSON 1,500.00 OR-011965 00000000 STUBBS 830.00 OR-011970 00000000 BRUCE 3,000.00 OR-011971 00000000 JOHNSON 3,000.00 OR-011972 14208628 DERRY DAVE CONSTRUCTION LARSON 8,000.00 OR-011974 14743130 SEAMANS CONSTRUCTION JOHNSON 7,000.00 OR-011980 15935325 ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC LOUGLLIN 4,775.00 OR-011981 15935325 ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC LOPEZ 7,500.00 OR-012000 00000000 DILLMAN 600.00 OR-012036 14719065 INCLINE ENTERRISES CARLSON 7,500.00 OR-012037 14284559 TOP GUN ROOFING KLING 6,300.00 OR-012039 15410304 WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY SWANoON 12,500.00 OR-012059 00000000 CARPENTER 1,100.00 OR-012067 14726539 SMITH WF ROOFING CALLAHAN 3,875.00 OR-011987 00000000 PERL 750.00 OR-012048 00000000 PETTIS 1,250.00 OR-011941 00000000 RYAN 6,000.00 OR-011953 14252227 WINDOW LITE BOSTON 12,800.00 OR-011912 15120110 ROELOFS REMODELING &RENOV KIRCHNER 26,000.00 OR-011944 14753330 LAUER HOMES. INC.ROVICK 200,000.00 OR-011952 15409404 FLAG BUILDERS INC TERRY 33,000.00 OR-011955 14252227 WINDOW LITE ROCCA 3,519.00 OR-011985 147240‘j2 HOME IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIS BONKIEWICZ 25,500.00 OR-0119H8 17314647 J R CONSTRUCTION INC DEVERE 25,000.00 OR-012004 00000000 OLSON 10,000.00 OR-011933 34282826 PRACTICAL SYST1:MS CARLSON 700.00 OR-011936 37544000 RICCAR HEATING fi. AIR JOHNSON 7,800.00 OR-011957 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS JOHNSON 1,200.00 46C FI 1C ME 01 01 01 02 02 02 03 04 04 05 06 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 15 15 24 24 29 29 29 29 29 29 46C 02 1C 2104 2120 100 3070 1685 1140 1685 1400 60 1380 650 395 3535 2227 3231 4485 3025 1020 2138 4690 2305 2560 1516 185 3435 4465 3085 1461 4215 4330 225 2496 2780 2730 4380 2545 1145 744 2245 1840 2000 1580 2056 2520 2705 2670 3580 01 3247 01 3290 01 1145 SUGARWOOD DR CARRIAGE LA CRYSTAL CREEK RD NORTH SHORE DR FOX ST TONKAWA RD CONCORDIA ST BRACKE'FTS POINT RD ORONO ORCHARD RD NORTH ARM DR BROWN RD N FERNDALE RD N IVY PL SHADYWOOD RD CASCO CIR BAYSIDE RD 6TH AVE N TOWNLINE RD SHADYWOOD RD TONKAVIEW LA BAYVIEW PL OLD BEACH RD LONG LAKE BLVD OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LIVINGSTON AVE BAYSIDE RD JAMESTOWN RD BAY RIDGE RD FOREST LAKE DR NORTH SHORE DR WILLOW DR N OLD BEACH RD WHITE OAK CIR SILVER VIEW DR 6TH AVE N NORTH SHORE DR WILLOW DR S DICKEY LAKE DR WATERTOWN RD SHADYWOOD RD SHADYWOOD RD BOHNS PT RD SHORELINE DR CASCO POINT RD WALTERS PORT LA COUNTRYSIDE DR W BAYSIDE RD CASCO CIR NAVARRE LA LOMA LINDA AVE 99/10/28 99/10/22 99/10/14 99/10/05 99/10/18 99/10/08 99/10/11 99/10/14 99/10/26 99/10/29 99/10/01 99/10/01 99/10/21 99/10/21 99/10/20 99/10/14 99/10/08 MON, NOV 1, 1999, 4:39 PM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999 PERMIT WORK ADDK NUR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NUK ID NUMBER COMPANY PAGE 2 OWNER LAST NM VALUATION MB 38C PL 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 24 24 24 24 29 30C 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 24 24 24 24 21 24 24 24 29. 1850 2850 3480 055 1370 1780 2775 1369 2102 1835 050 55 3315 850 3095 580 3030 850 1410 160 3030 480 1370 2745 3290 4300 3030 100 480 880 1325 1185 3405 2820 3090 850 2102 2000 883 3030 4448 2705 2056 1040 2565 1605 080 4199 1972 1580 2820 FOX RIDGE RD LITTLE ORCHARD WAY NORTH SHORE DR FOREST ARMS LA FRENCH CREEK DR SHORELINE DR COUNTRYSIDE DR W NORTH ARM DR SUGARWOOD DR SHADYWOOD RD WILLOW DR N LANDMARK DR CRYSTAL BAY RD WILLOW DR N CASCO POINT RD NORTH ARM DR CASCO POINT RD WILLOW DR N CHERRY PL GOLDEN VIEW DR CASCO POINT RD DEBORAH DR FRENCH CREEK DR ETHEL AVE NAVARRE LA 6TH AVE N CASCO POINT RD FERNDALE GREEN DEBORAH DR WINDJAMMER LA SHORELINE DR FERNDALE RD W 6TH AVE N FARVIEW LA FARVIEW LA WILLOW DR N SUGARWOOD DR SHADYWOOD RD FERNDALE RD W CASCO POINT RD NORTH SHORE DR WALTERS PORT LA SHORELINE DR TOWNLINE RD WOODHAVEN DR FOX ST WINDJAMMER LA NORTH SHORE DR SHADYWOOD RD BOHNS PT RD FARVIEW LA FERNDALE GREEN 99/10/06 OR- 99/10/12 OR- 99/10/08 OR- 99/10/13 OR- 99/10/14 OR- 99/10/14 OR- 99/10/14 OR- 99/10/14 OR- 99/10/15 OR- 99/10/15 OR- 99/10/18 OR- 99/10/18 OR- 99/10/20 OR- 99/10/20 OR- 99/10/20 OR- 99/10/21 OR- 99/10/22 OR- 99/10/25 OR- 99/10/25 OR- 99/10/29 OR- 99/10/01 OR- 99/10/07 OR- 99/10/07 OR- 99/10/11 OR- 99/10/12 OR- 99/10/13 OR- 99/10/25 OR- 99/10/25 OR- 99/10/28 OR 99/10/07 OR 99/10/01 OR 99/10/13 OR 99/10/20 OR 99/10/22 OR 99/10/27 OR 011959 011967 011968 011991 011996 011997 011998 011999 012003 012005 -012010 -012014 •012025 -012026 -012027 -012034 -012045 -012050 -012053 -012069 -011934 -011963 -011964 -011975 -011989 -011993 -012046 -012051 -012068 -011961 -011937 -011990 -012031 -012042 -012050 99/10/18 OR 99/10/18 OR- 99/10/18 OR- 99/10/18 OR- 99/10/06 OR- 99/10/25 OR- '>9/10/27 OR- 99/10/27 OR- 99/10/04 OR- 99/10/07 OR- 99/10/10 OR- 99/10/19 OR- 99/10/20 OR- 99/10/20 OR- 99/10/21 OR- 99/10/25 OR- 99/10/28 OR 012013 012015 012017 012018 011960 ■012052 ■012060 ■012064 ■011943 ■011962 -012016 -012019 -012024 -012030 -012035 -012054 - 012066 36332561 34817939 37862341 34791600 34282826 35350194 33157500 00000000 38940005 34282826 36899181 34282826 35453797 35453797 35453797 34791600 34485828 37209056 33386606 35531445 34485828 34212419 35453797 34019604 00000000 34792000 34485828 19414211 30332561 39414211 37575040 39290767 34791000 37575040 34282020 27735740 25334357 29337717 29296767 24725300 24738403 27839000 25291172 28274033 20274033 25505660 25510555 28274033 24725920 29337717 2827 403 1 24" 403 FIRESIDE CORNER AMERICAN TANK SERVICES INC CONDOR FIREPLACE AND STONE COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DEAN'S TANK OIL AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BURNSVILLE HEATING CO PRACTICAL SYSTEMS CONWAY MECHANICAL PRACTICAL SYSTEMS FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C AIR REFRIGERATION NELSON MASONRY WOODLAND ST0VES6FIREPLACES GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS AIR REFRIGERATION KALMES MECHANICAL INC FIREP?ACE CENTER ANDERSON COOLING & HEATING LAKE-AIR HTG AIR REFRIGERATION KLEVE HTG 6 AC FIRESIDE CORNER KLEVE HTG £. AC DEPENDABLE HTG & AC VOGT FRED U CO COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C DEPENDABLE HTG & AC PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DINIUS PLUMBING PLYMOUTH PLUMBING THOMPSON PLBG NEU PLUMBING SUPERIOR PLUMBING DAY EARL W & SONS PLUMBING SERVICES INC BARNES PLUMBING NORBLOM PLUMBING CO NORBLOM PLUMBING CO AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA MR ROOTER NORBLOM PLUMBING CO OLSON LARRY THOMPSON PLBG NORBLOM PLUMBING CO DAY EAR I. W (. SONS CARPENTER 1,100.00 7,800.00 CARLSON 1,200.00 4,550.00 HASSELQUIST 2,500.00 WINTON 1,750.00 WHARRAM 1,544.19 500.00 HUTTON 20,000.00 900.00 PERKINS 34,295.00 800.00 KEENAN 1,200.00 HOAGLUND 3.000. 00 1.000. 00 JOHNSON 500.00 ROHNIG 5,000.00 CARLSON 2,075.00 WILBUR 3,500.00 SCHMID 3,500.00 RONNINGEN 1,600.00 HOFFMAN 4,500.00 ANDERSON 2,600.00 JENSEN 500.00 JOHNSON 2,000.00 GEHRMAN 3,300.00 ROHNIG 4,960.00 BURNHAM 1.275.00 1.100.00 4,295.00 DUOOS 2,054.00 COSTLEY 1,615.00 SAWYER 3,400.00 HOWARD 5,767.00 SCHMIDT 1,000.00 CARLSON 22,135.00 RONNINGEN 14,270.00 3,950.00 65,000.00 2,000.00 SENN 4,500.00 BONKIEWICZ 7,000.00 K 7,500.00 KICKHAFER 400.00 BASHORE 400.00 HANSWER 3,000.00 BUNHAM 550.00 KLEIN 400.00 HOLMLUND 3,850.00 ROVICK 28,000.00 HOWARD 400.00 HULSE 889.00 MON,*NOV -4, .999, 4:39 PM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM PAGE 3 VALUATION 17C 17C SI 19 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 99/10/13OR-011994 00000000 KRAHENBUHL .00 1C 1C SW 01 465 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 99/10/06OR-01195827813737GENE'S WATER 6c SEWER HAMM .00 01 4070 DAHL RD 99/10/12OR-01198224720805ALS MASTER PLUMBING DAHLQUIST .00 01 160 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 99/10/15OR-01200800000000 ROKKE .00 01 4340 6TH AVE N 99/10/18OR-01201154791762HAYES EXCAVATING WILLIAMS .00 01 1980 6TH AVE N 99/10/18OR-01201254791762HAYES EXCAVATING BERGERON .00 01 2515 KELLY AVE 99/10/19OR-01202024461495WIDMER INC HARDTEN .00 01 80 SMITH AVE 99/10/20OR-01202200000000 MCMILLAN .00 01 80 SMITH AVE 99/10/20OR-012023 24461495WIDMER INC MCMILLAN .00 01 2104 SUGARWOOD DR 99/10/20OR-012032 24722316COPPIN PLBG .00 01 2879 FARVIEW LA 99/10/21OR-012033 07237155CLOVER HILL CO INC HUBERER .00 01 2120 CARRIAGE LA 99/10/26OR-01205654791762HAYES EXCAVATING BOHL .00 01 2755 DEER RUN TR E 99/10/28OR-01206554612100DASEN CONTRACTING CO INC POST .00 20 795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 99/10/22OR-012030 23232900 JULIAN JOHNSON CONSTRUCT .00 24 2675 SILVER VIEW DR 99/10/25OR-01204752952511FYLE*S EXCAVATING ISAACS .00 14C 14C UD 01 1310 SPRUCE PL 99/10/04OR-01194284721919PROFESSIONAL SPRINKLER WALKER .00 01 3516 IVY PL 99/10/11OR-01197800000000 WHITE .00 01 1820 FOX ST 99/10/21OR-01202819289262AULIK 6c LULOFF MACMILLAN .00 23 998 WILDHURST TR 99/10/22OR-01204114558238SOUTHVIEW DESIGN & CONSTRU ZEBECK .00 99 290 WOODHILL RD 99/10/14OR-01200114769667BUILD-RITE CONSTRUCTION O'MALLEY 30,000.00 5C 5C 122C 2,662,696.19* MON. NOV 1, ^000, 4:39 PM PAGE 1 NUMERICAL LISTING OCTOBER 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM OR-011911 OR-011912 OR-011915 OR-011933 OR-011934 OR-011935 OR-011936 OR-011937 OR-011938 OR-011939 OR-011941 OR-011942 OR-011943 OR-011944 OR-011946 OR-011940 OR-011950 OR-OI1951 OR-011952 OR-O119r> OR-011955 OR-011957 OR-011950 OR-OH959 OR-011960 OR-011961 OR-011962 OR-011963 OR-0119C4 OR-011965 OR-011966 OR-011967 OR-011968 OR-011969 OR-011970 OR-011971 OR-011972 OR-011973 OR-011974 OR-011975 OR-011976 OR-011978 OR-011979 OR-011900 OR-011981 OR-011982 OR-011985 OR-011987 OR-011988 OR-011989 OR-011990 OR-011991 OR-011993 OR-011994 99/10/06 N 99/10/08 N 99/10/05 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/01 N 99/10/04 N 99/10/04 N 99/10/04 N 99/10/06 N 99/10/04 N 99/10/05 N 99/10/05 N 99/10/05 N 99/10/12 N S9/10/0 ; N 99/i*:/07 N 99/10/06 N 99/10/06 N 99/10/06 N 99/10/06 N 99/10/07 N 99/10/07 N 99/10/07 N 99/10/07 N 99/10/00 N 99/10/08 N 99/10/12 N 99/10/08 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/00 N 99/10/08 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/11 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/12 N 99/10/12 N 99/10/12 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/08 N 99/10/12 N 99/10/13 N 99/10/13 N 99/10/13 N 99/10/13 N 3070 NORTH SHORE DR 02 2000 SHADYWOOD RD 29 395 FERNDALE RD N 09 3247 CASCO CIR 01 3030 CASCO POINT RD 02 2104 SUGARWOOD DR 01 3290 NAVARRE LA 01 1325 SHORELINE DR 24 2138 SHADYWOOD RD 11 4690 TONKAVIEW LA 11 2245 WATERTOWN RD 24 1310 SPRUCE PL 01 1040 TOWNLINE RD 24 1580 BOHNS PT RD 29 2305 BAYVIEW PL 11 1685 FOX ST 02 2560 OLD BEACH RD 11 1516 LONG LAKE BLVD 11 2056 SHORELINE DR 29 1040 SHADYWOOD RD 24 2520 CASCO POINT RD 29 1145 LOMA LINDA AVE 01 465 ORONO ORCHARD RD •> I 1050 FOX RIDGE RD 01 3030 CASCO POINT RD 02 880 WINDJAMMER LA 03 2565 WOODHAVEN DR 24 400 DEBORAH DR 02 1370 FRENCH CPEEK DR 02 185 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD N 11 2227 SHADYWOOD RD 10 2050 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 3480 NORTH SHORE DR 01 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD 04 3435 LIVINGSTON AVE 11 4465 BAYSIDR RD 11 3085 JAMESTOWN RD 11 3535 IVY PL 09 1461 BAY RIDGE RD 11 2745 ETHEL AVE 02 3231 CASCO CIR 10 3516 IVY PL 01 650 BROWN RD N 06 4215 FOREST LAKE DR 11 4330 NORTH SHORE DR 11 4070 DAHL RD 01 2705 WALTERS PORT LA 29 1145 WILLOW DR S 15 2670 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 29 3290 NAVARRE LA 02 1185 FERNDALE RD W 24 855 FOREST ARMS LA 01 4300 6TH AVE N 02 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 19 14791890 15120110 15429000 34282826 34485828 13281421 37544000 37575040 00000000 00000000 00000000 04721919 20274033 14753330 00000000 19340106 14042984 00000000 15409404 14252227 14252227 31282826 C/ 17 30332561 24725306 39414211 28274033 34212419 35453797 00000000 17216620 34817939 37862341 17394235 00000000 00000000 14208628 15429000 14743130 34019604 00000000 00000000 14539406 15935325 15935325 24720805 14724092 00000000 17314647 OOOwOOOO 39296767 34761600 34792000 00000000 STRUCTURES UNLIMITED INC ROELOFS REMODELING & RENOV DALPHIN POOL 6 SPA PRACTICAL SYSTEMS AIR REFRIGERATION RVC HOMES RICCAR HEAVJ.vC fc AIR DEPENDABL.'. HTG & AC PROFESSIONAL SPRINKLER NORBLOM PLUMBING CO LAUER HOMES, INC. BOLDENOW JERRY METRO HANDYMAN FLAG BUILDERS INC WINDOW LITE WINDOW LITE PRACTICAL SYSTEMS ci:ne';: wa’I'KR a. ;;kwku FIRESIDE CORNER SUPERIOR PLUMBING KLEVE HTG f< AC NORBLOM PLUMBING CO KALMES MECHANICAL INC FIREPLACE CENTER PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA AMERICAN TANK SERVICES INC CONDOR FIREPLACE AND STONE DAVID M. NORD BERRY DAVE CONSTRUCTION DALPHIN POOL & SPA SEAMANS CONSTRUCTION ANDERSON COOLING & HEATING RENSLOW'S DECKS & GAZEBOS ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC ALS IiASlER PLUMBING HOME IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIS J R CONSTRUCTION INC VOGT FRED & CO COUNTRYSIDE HTG LAKE-AIR HTG A/C OWNER LAST NM VALUATION HUSSAIN KIRCHNER 26,000.00 TOPOUSIS 20.000.00 CARLSON 700.00 RONNINGEN 1,600.00 375,000.00 JOHNSON 7,800.00 DUOOS 2,054.00 LAGUE 10,000.00 BULL 1,200.00 RYAN 6,000.00 WALKER .00 KICKHAFER 400.00 ROVICK 200,000.00 BLOCK 2,500.00 CASHMAN 100,000.00 KREY 3,500.00 FREDRICKSON 1,500.00 TERRY 33,000.00 BOSTON 12,800.00 ROCCA 3,519.00 JOHNSON 1,200.00 HAMM .00 1,100.00 RONNINGEN 2,000.00 BURNHAM 4,295.00 BASHORE 400.00 HOFFMAN 4,500.00 ANDERSON 2,600.00 STUBBS 830.00 SPAULDING 22,713.00 CARPENTER 7.800.00 1.200.00 JUNDT 40,000.00 BRUCE 3,000.00 JOHNSON 3,000.00 LARSON 8,000.00 LINDGREN 20,000.00 JOHNSON 7,000.00 JENSEN 500.00 COOPER 1,500.00 WHITE .00 GARRETT 10,000.00 LOUGLLIN 4,775.00 LOPEZ 7,500.00 DAHLQUIST .00 BONKIEWICZ 25,500.00 PERL 750.00 DEVERE 25,000.00 JOHNSON 2,000.00 C03TLEY 1,615.00 CARLSON 4,550.00 GEHRMAN 3,300.00 KRAHENBUHL .00 MON, NOV 1, 1999, 4:39 PM PAGE 2 NUMERICAL LISTING PERMIT NBR ISSUED OCTOBER 1999 CANCEL ADDR NBR STREKT WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION HAUS 1,000.00 HASSELQUIST 2,500.00 WINTON 1,750.00 1,544.19 WHARRAM 500.00 DILLMAN 600.00 O'MALLEY 30,000.00 KYLE 350,000.00 20,000.00 OLSON 10,000.00 HUTTON 900.00 PALM 25,600.00 ROKKE .00 WHITELEY 18,000.00 34.295.00 WILLIAMS .00 BERGERON .00 CARLSON 22,135.00 PERKINS 800.00 14,270.00 HANSWER 3,000.00 3,950.00 65,000.00 BUNHAM 550.00 HARDTEN .00 MCMILLAN .00 MCMILLAN .00 KLEIN 400.00 KEENAN 1,200.00 3,000.00 HOAGLUND 1,000.00 MACMILLAN .00 520,000.00 HOLMLUND 3,850.00 SAWYER 3,400.00 .00 HUBERER .00 JOHNSON 500.00 ROVICK 28,000.00 CARLSON 7,500.00 KLING 6,300.00 .00 SWANSON 12,500.00 SANDBERG 3,500.00 ZEBECK .00 HOWARD 5,767.00 ROHNIG 5,000.00 RCHNIG 4,960.00 ISAACS .00 PETTIS 1,250.00 CARLSON 2.875.00 1.275.00 SENN 4,500.00 WILBUR 3,500.00 OR-011995 OR-011996 OR-011997 OR-011998 OR-011999 OR-012000 OR-012001 OR-012002 OR-012003 OR-012004 OR-012005 OR-012007 OR-012008 OR-012009 OR-012010 OR-012011 OR-012012 OR-012013 OR-012014 OR-012015 OR-012016 OR-012017 OR-01201B OR-012019 OR-012020 OR-012022 OR-012023 OR-012024 OR.012025 OR-012026 OR-012027 OR-012028 OR-012029 OR-012030 OR-012031 OR-C12032 OR-012033 OR-012034 OR-U12035 OR-012036 OR-012037 CR-012038 OR-012039 OR-012040 OR-012041 OR-012042 OR-012045 OR-012046 OR-012047 OR-012048 OR-012050 OR-012051 OR-012052 OR-012053 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/14 N 99/10/15 N 99/10/15 N 99/10/15 N 99/10/15 N 99/10/15 N 99/10/J5 N 99/10/28 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 H 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/18 N 99/10/19 N 99/10/19 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/20 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/21 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/22 N 99/10/25 N 99/10/25 N 99/10/25 N 99/10/25 N 99/10/25 N 99/10/25 N •' '10/25 N 4485 1370 1780 277S 1369 225 290 1140 2102 3580 1835 1605 180 60 850 4340 1980 850 55 2102 1685 2000 883 880 2515 80 80 4199 3315 850 3095 1820 i 20 1972 3405 2104 2879 580 1580 2496 2780 795 2730 1380 998 2820 3030 3030 2675 744 850 100 4440 1410 BAYSIDE RD 10 FRENCH CREEK DR 01 SHORELINE DR 01 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 N''RTH ARM DR 01 WILLOW DR N il WOODHILL RD 99 TONKAWA RD 02 SUGARWOOD DR 01 BAYSIDE RD 02 SHADYWOOD RD 01 CONCORDIA ST 03 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 01 ORONO ORCHARD RD 04 WILLOW DR N 01 6TH AVE N 01 6TH AVE N 01 WILLOW DR N 01 LANDMARK DR 01 SUGARWOOD DR 01 FOX ST 24 SHADYWOOD RD 01 FERNDALE RD W 01 WINDJAMMER L/i 24 KELLY AVE 01 SMITH AVE 01 SMITH AVE 01 NORTH SHORE DR 24 CRYSTAL BAY RD 01 WILLOW DR N 01 CASCO POINT RD 01 FOX ST 01 CARRIAGE LA 01 SHADYWOOD RD 24 6TH AVE N 24 SUGARWOOD DR 01 FARVILW LA 01 NORTH ARM DR 01 BOHNS PT RD 24 OLD BEACH RD 11 WHITE OAK CIrt 11 or.n CRYSTAL DAY RD N 20 SILVER VIEW PR 11 NORTH ARM DR 05 WILDHURGT TR 21 FARVIEW LA 24 CASCO POINT RD 01 CASCO POINT RD 02 SILVER VIEW DR 24 DICKEY LAKE DR 15 WILLOW DR N 01 FERNDALE GREEN 02 NORTH SHORE DR 02 CHERRY PL 01 00000000 34282826 35350194 33157500 00000000 00000000 14769667 00000000 38940005 00000000 34282826 13614949 00000000 00000000 36899181 54791762 54791762 27735740 34282826 25334357 25509666 29337717 29296767 25510555 24461495 00000000 24461495 28274033 35453797 35453797 35453797 19289262 14754902 24725920 34791600 24722316 07237155 34791600 29337717 14719065 14284559 23232900 15410304 00000000 14558238 37575040 34465828 34485028 52952511 OOPOOOOO 37 109056 39414211 24738403 33’ 506 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DEAN'S TANK OIL AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BUILD-RITE CONSTRUCTION BURNSVILLE HEATING CO PRACTICAL SYSTEMS KNIGHT CONST/DESINGNS INC CONWAY MECHANICAL HAYES EXCAVATING HAYES EXCAVATING DINIUS PLUMBING PRACTICAL SYSTEMS PLYMOUTH PLUMBING AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA THOMPSON PLBG NEU PLUMBING MR ROOTER WIDMER INC WIDMER INC NORBLOM PLUMBING CO FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER AULIK & LULOFF PILLAR HOMES OLSON LARRY COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C COPPIN PLBG CLOVER HILL CO INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C THOMPSON PLBG INCLINE ENTERRISES TOP GUN ROOFING JULIAN JOHNSON CONSTRUCT WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY SOUTHVIEW DESIGN & CONSTRU DEPENDABLE HTG & AC AIR REFRIGERATION AIR REFRIGERATION FYLE’S EXCAVA'. ING NELSON MASONRY KLEVE HTG & AC D,\Y EARL W t. SONS '•lOODLAND STOVESJ.fiREPLACES MON, NOV 1, .999, 4:39 PM NUMERICAL LISTING OCTOBER 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 3 WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION HOWARD 400.00 BOHL .00 MCKEE 2,600.00 SCHMIDT 1,000.00 CARPENTER 1,100.00 BONKIEWICZ 7,000.00 295,000.00 K 7,500.00 POST .00 HULSE 889.00 CALLAHAN 3.875.00 1.100.00 SCHMID 3,500.00 LUNIESKI 22,860.00 OR-012054 OR-012056 OR-012057 OR-012058 OR-012059 OR-012060 OR-012062 OR-012064 OR-012065 OR-012066 OR-012067 OR-012068 OR-012069 OR-012070 122C 99/10/25 N 99/10/26 N 99/10/26 N 99/10/27 N 99/10/27 N 99/10/27 N 99/10/28 •• 99/10/27 N 99/10/28 N 99/10/28 N 99/10/28 N 99/10/28 N 99/10/29 N 99/10/29 N 2820 2120 3025 3090 4380 2705 100 2056 2755 95 2545 480 160 1020 FARVIEW LA CARRIAGE LA 6TH AVE N FARVIEW LA 6TH AVE N WALTERS PORT LA CRYSTAL CREEK RD SHORELINE DR DEER RUN TR E FERNDALE GREEN NORTH SHORE DR DEBORAH DR GOLDEN VIEW DR TOWNLINE RD 24 28274033 01 54791762 10 00000000 29 34282826 11 00000000 02 27839080 01 17313153 02 25291172 01 54612100 29 24738403 11 14726539 02 36332561 01 35331445 10 17216628 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO HAYES EXCAVATING PRACTICAL SYSTEMS INCPLUMBING SERVICES CHARLES CUDD CO BARNES PLUMBING DASEN CONTRACTING CO INC DAY EARL V/ & SONS SMITH WF ROOFING FIRESIDE CORNER GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 99 9999 WORK TYPE CODE Residence Addition Garage/Attached Garage/Detached Porch Deck Fence Gazebo Pool Re-side Re-roof Tennis Court Sign Dock Shed Demo-Principal Structure Demo-Accessory Structure Move Commercial Institutj-?>'.al Storm Damage Repair 1-100 Cubic Yards 101 Cubic Yards or More Undefined LOCAL OSB CODES Undefined 24 Replacing Existing 25 Lifting Principal Residence 26 Well Abandonment 27 Foundation Only 28 Temporary Trailer 29 Renovate/Remodel 30 Accessory Structure 31 Stairway to Lake 32 Retaining Wall 33 Entrance Monuments 34 Tree Removal OCTOBER 1999 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 ***** permit issued report CITY OF ORONO ***** -- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/99 - 10/31/99 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/01/99 ***** permit FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/99 TO 10/31/99 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 2,950.00 2,950.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 2,S50.00 2,950.00 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- PREVIOUS RANGE 10/01/98 - 10/31/bd PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY base FEE User Defined _ .. SUBDIVISION 3 800.00 0.00 0.00 2 600.00 VARIANCE 5 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 4 900.00 CUP 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 550.00 SKETCH PLAN 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 VARIANCE/CUP 1 500.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 Sub-total 11*2,950.00*0.00*0.00*8*2,300.00* Grand-total 11**2,950.00**0.00**0.00**8**2,300.00** VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0.00* 0.00** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00** PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE r COIIWCIL MEETING DEC 1 3 1999 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, DECEMB^|^jJg^Jj^^P.M#. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, OROl (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE BY IRENE SILBER x/l. 2000 Lev>' Adoption anng - Adoption of 2000 Budget and Tax Levy A. Adopt Final 1 y99 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000 - Resolution B. Adopt 2000 General Fund Budget - Resolution C. Adopt the 2000 Special Revenue Funds Budgets - Resolution APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦ 3. Regular Council Meeting of November 22, 1999 * 4. Truth in Taxation Meeting of December 6,1999 /PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning commission comments - Liz Hawn, Representative ^ PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT #2418 Release of Conditional Use Permit from Crystal Bay Preser\^e - Resolution #2522 Bancor Group, Inc., Southwest Comer of County Road 6 and North Willow Drive, Class III Subdivision, Preliminary Plat of Willow View y/^1. #2540 Bradley Hoyt, 2523 Kelly Avenue - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit #2544 Alfred and Marilyn Richie, 905 Tonkawa Road - Final Plat of Richie Addition - Resolution A). #2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South - Class III Subdivision MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT EF^INEER REPORT ‘''io. Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects V11. East Long Lake Sewer Project ' A. Order Feasibility Study - Resolution B. Receive Feasibility Study and Schedule Public Hearing - Resolution CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Highway 12 Preliminary Layout - Resolution «/l3. Public Works Site Expansion - Eminent Domain Option - Resolution J I' ' AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 13,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA •44Park Commission Reappointments *^5. Council Liaison to Park Commission and Planning Commission Meetings in 2000 Declaration of Local Jurisdiction Re: ISTS - Resolution ■J417. Formal Opening of North Arm Lane as Public Road - Resolution 4300 Watertown Road - Right-of-Way Buildability Credit - Resolution •y 19. Appointment of Full-Time Police Officers ^ 20. Appointment of Full-Time Community Service Officer ✓21. Schedule Work Sessions *^12. Request to Establish insurance Fund - Resolution sAh.Letter of Intent to Purchase Squad Cars Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 1999 ^ 25. 1999 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments •^26. Authorization to Disburse City Funds for Claims Received *y27. Changes in Utility Billing Late Fee Policy t/28. 2000 Meeting Schedule i^9. 1999 Marina Licenses - Resolutions \ T CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT ♦ 30. LICENSES 2000 3.2 Beer Renewals Kennel * 31. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1999 12/13 - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Last regular meeting in 1999) 12/16 - Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study Committee Meeting, 4:00 p.m. 12/23 - HOLIDAY, CHRISTMAS 12/24 - HOLIDAY, CHRISTMAS 12.'31 - HOLIDAY, NEW YEAR'S 2000 01/03 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 01/10 - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. 01/17 - HOLIDAY, h'jartin Luther King Jr. Day 01/19 - Planning Commission Meeting, Wednesday. 6:30 p.m. 01/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.